WEBVTT

00:00:15.539 --> 00:00:16.557
<v Riley Bowman>And welcome to the Concealed Carry

00:00:16.557 --> 00:00:20.630
<v Riley Bowman>Podcast, part of the ConcealedCarry.com network, brought to you by HK.

00:00:21.460 --> 00:00:27.695
<v Riley Bowman>Today is Thursday, June 25th, 2026, as of this live recording.

00:00:28.223 --> 00:00:32.472
<v Riley Bowman>I am your host, Riley Bowman, joined by co-host Jacob Paulson.

00:00:32.739 --> 00:00:33.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>Howdy, howdy, howdy.

00:00:33.935 --> 00:00:38.447
<v Riley Bowman>Howdy, howdy. We are glad to be with you. Kind of missed you last week.

00:00:39.757 --> 00:00:43.310
<v Riley Bowman>A bunch of things going on and travel and, yeah.

00:00:43.589 --> 00:00:44.157
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was a busy week.

00:00:44.157 --> 00:00:49.987
<v Riley Bowman>It was a busy week. Uh, but, uh, uh, if you missed it, there's a episode that

00:00:49.987 --> 00:00:55.588
<v Riley Bowman>is, should be published today or tomorrow, uh, to make up for our missing of last week's episode.

00:00:55.918 --> 00:00:58.857
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, so look, look to catch that one. That'll be a good one.

00:00:58.857 --> 00:01:05.267
<v Riley Bowman>It's actually a replay of a past, uh, 10, 10 years ago, actually episode 10

00:01:05.267 --> 00:01:11.161
<v Riley Bowman>years ago, probably this week, actually, or close to it. Wowzers. Isn't that weird?

00:01:11.741 --> 00:01:16.517
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, 10 years ago we did a special episode where we talked about the history

00:01:16.517 --> 00:01:23.117
<v Riley Bowman>leading up to the war for independence, particularly the gun control that was

00:01:23.117 --> 00:01:25.637
<v Riley Bowman>one of the, you know, wasn't the only thing that kicked off the war.

00:01:25.637 --> 00:01:29.057
<v Riley Bowman>It was a major spark. Yeah, definitely a spark. That's a good word for it, actually.

00:01:29.057 --> 00:01:32.347
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, certainly it's what caused the initial shots to be fired.

00:01:32.347 --> 00:01:34.980
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, Lexington and Concord, of course, what we're referring to.

00:01:35.183 --> 00:01:37.279
<v Riley Bowman>Things going on around Boston area.

00:01:37.534 --> 00:01:42.217
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, kind of a big deal in our nation's history. And we kind of did a whole

00:01:42.217 --> 00:01:47.127
<v Riley Bowman>deep dive into the history surrounding that, particularly from a gun control

00:01:47.127 --> 00:01:50.741
<v Riley Bowman>perspective. And I thought, you know, I thought that was a pretty good episode.

00:01:51.309 --> 00:01:56.767
<v Riley Bowman>And with now being kind of the 10-year anniversary of that episode and it not

00:01:56.767 --> 00:02:01.497
<v Riley Bowman>being available in the podcast feed anymore.

00:02:01.497 --> 00:02:07.697
<v Riley Bowman>And being that this is the 250th birthday of our nation, it's time to maybe bring that back.

00:02:07.697 --> 00:02:11.244
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I have identified five

00:02:12.348 --> 00:02:17.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>books that I am rereading between now and the end of July of this year in celebration

00:02:17.622 --> 00:02:20.121
<v Jacob Paulsen>of the 250th anniversary. I've finished one of them already.

00:02:20.277 --> 00:02:21.456
<v Jacob Paulsen>I started this about a week ago.

00:02:22.176 --> 00:02:22.532
<v Riley Bowman>Wow. Good for you.

00:02:22.692 --> 00:02:27.012
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I'm in the second one now. So I just finished 1776 by David McCullough.

00:02:27.172 --> 00:02:28.491
<v Riley Bowman>Dude, that takes a while to get through.

00:02:28.642 --> 00:02:31.032
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. I've read that book like three or four times. I used to read it every

00:02:31.032 --> 00:02:34.144
<v Jacob Paulsen>July 4th. Well, I shouldn't say used to. I did that for like three or four years in a row. Yeah.

00:02:34.609 --> 00:02:39.676
<v Jacob Paulsen>And now it's been many years since I read it. So I just finished that book maybe two days ago.

00:02:40.205 --> 00:02:44.892
<v Jacob Paulsen>So now I'm now I'm in the middle of Washington secret six, which is a really

00:02:44.892 --> 00:02:47.815
<v Jacob Paulsen>fun read, though It's the least like

00:02:49.056 --> 00:02:52.596
<v Jacob Paulsen>The authors are just, they're terrible at writing history. Like it's,

00:02:52.996 --> 00:02:54.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>there's too much creative license.

00:02:55.065 --> 00:02:57.356
<v Jacob Paulsen>But that said, the facts are all true.

00:02:58.056 --> 00:03:02.536
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just, they put in some narratives and things that are fictional to add

00:03:02.536 --> 00:03:05.216
<v Jacob Paulsen>some drama to it. But anyway, fantastic read.

00:03:06.096 --> 00:03:09.596
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm probably getting close. Yeah, I'm probably two thirds through that book.

00:03:09.596 --> 00:03:10.629
<v Jacob Paulsen>I started like three days ago.

00:03:11.244 --> 00:03:15.026
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway, I'm also going to read American Creation, Revolutionary Summer,

00:03:15.026 --> 00:03:17.287
<v Jacob Paulsen>and Washington's Crossing.

00:03:17.972 --> 00:03:19.696
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm getting through all those.

00:03:20.410 --> 00:03:23.536
<v Riley Bowman>I may need to take a peek at some of those myself. Yeah. Although,

00:03:23.536 --> 00:03:29.976
<v Riley Bowman>boy, you telling me that you re-listened to 1776, I really enjoyed that book

00:03:29.976 --> 00:03:35.266
<v Riley Bowman>immensely when I did the audiobook thing. Of course, that's pretty much how.

00:03:35.266 --> 00:03:36.536
<v Jacob Paulsen>Me too. I'm listening to all this.

00:03:37.276 --> 00:03:39.496
<v Riley Bowman>And I still think, I still call that reading books.

00:03:39.836 --> 00:03:41.516
<v Jacob Paulsen>Me too. I don't distinguish.

00:03:41.516 --> 00:03:46.224
<v Riley Bowman>But I did that a year or two ago and really enjoyed 1776.

00:03:47.476 --> 00:03:53.381
<v Riley Bowman>I'm currently trying to finish the David McCullough biography on John Adams.

00:03:53.909 --> 00:03:54.600
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's a thick book.

00:03:54.763 --> 00:03:55.416
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, it is.

00:03:55.416 --> 00:03:58.196
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, 1776 is a small read in comparison.

00:03:59.216 --> 00:04:03.076
<v Riley Bowman>I've been working on this one for a while, and I kind of fell by the wayside for a bit.

00:04:04.707 --> 00:04:08.642
<v Jacob Paulsen>I've only read that once. That's been many years ago now. But I really enjoyed

00:04:09.084 --> 00:04:14.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>the HBO series based on that book, which is weird to say that a series is based

00:04:14.116 --> 00:04:15.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>on a book that is, in fact, a biography.

00:04:16.102 --> 00:04:21.526
<v Jacob Paulsen>The series is just based on John Adams' life but I have that on DVD as well

00:04:21.526 --> 00:04:24.873
<v Jacob Paulsen>and I've watched that more recently but it's fabulous I mean it's really good

00:04:26.096 --> 00:04:30.516
<v Jacob Paulsen>big fan and a book that's similar that I really like in fact I prefer it for

00:04:30.516 --> 00:04:34.156
<v Jacob Paulsen>people who want a shorter book is a book called First Family and it's about

00:04:34.156 --> 00:04:36.396
<v Jacob Paulsen>John and Abigail and their family and so

00:04:37.416 --> 00:04:42.536
<v Jacob Paulsen>you get a little bit more a little bit more dynamic beyond John himself but

00:04:42.536 --> 00:04:44.853
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's a shorter read it's not nearly as

00:04:46.223 --> 00:04:48.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>detailed as John Adams by David McCaw.

00:04:49.143 --> 00:04:50.796
<v Riley Bowman>I've really enjoyed learning more about him.

00:04:53.158 --> 00:04:57.158
<v Riley Bowman>And I know this would probably upset him a little bit, kind of the person he

00:04:57.158 --> 00:04:58.569
<v Riley Bowman>was and his aspirations.

00:04:59.074 --> 00:05:03.688
<v Riley Bowman>But he kind of seemed like he probably felt like, even if it was true or not

00:05:03.688 --> 00:05:06.522
<v Riley Bowman>true, it was true at times and probably not as true at other times.

00:05:06.824 --> 00:05:10.508
<v Riley Bowman>It felt like he was playing second fiddle a lot of times to other people,

00:05:10.508 --> 00:05:12.028
<v Riley Bowman>including George Washington himself.

00:05:12.028 --> 00:05:13.930
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's his own personal baggage. Yeah.

00:05:15.758 --> 00:05:19.668
<v Riley Bowman>And so that is true, though. That's kind of, you know, we think about George

00:05:19.668 --> 00:05:22.298
<v Riley Bowman>Washington. and we're like yeah and then there's that John Adams guy and yes

00:05:22.298 --> 00:05:24.112
<v Riley Bowman>he was the first vice president and like,

00:05:24.663 --> 00:05:27.187
<v Riley Bowman>You know, and the second president, and he's just sort of...

00:05:27.447 --> 00:05:32.517
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, but he had a complex about this, right? Like, his dying words were exclaiming

00:05:32.517 --> 00:05:33.797
<v Jacob Paulsen>that Jefferson still lives.

00:05:33.797 --> 00:05:34.707
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, right.

00:05:34.707 --> 00:05:39.707
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, he was upset that he didn't outlive Thomas Jefferson. Yeah.

00:05:39.707 --> 00:05:44.487
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know, they were the last two signers of the Declaration alive when they

00:05:44.487 --> 00:05:46.792
<v Jacob Paulsen>passed. And they passed on the same day within hours of each other.

00:05:46.955 --> 00:05:50.577
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. But that's, yeah, that's how heavy that baggage, that personal complex

00:05:50.577 --> 00:05:53.927
<v Jacob Paulsen>was. Like, I'm dying and that guy is still alive.

00:05:54.287 --> 00:05:59.487
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah exactly you know so that's what i mean is like we tend to not know as much

00:05:59.487 --> 00:06:01.032
<v Riley Bowman>about him as we probably should

00:06:01.426 --> 00:06:05.217
<v Riley Bowman>and so i have enjoyed getting to know him a bit better very principled fellow

00:06:05.478 --> 00:06:11.241
<v Riley Bowman>he is very principled i agree he may not have been the most likable fellow uh for a lot of people

00:06:11.648 --> 00:06:15.637
<v Riley Bowman>but uh he was there's definitely one thing you could say about him and is he

00:06:15.637 --> 00:06:19.267
<v Riley Bowman>he knew his principles and he stood by them absolutely very.

00:06:19.267 --> 00:06:25.098
<v Jacob Paulsen>Weird father too as far as like parenting goes It was like he turned out one incredible human.

00:06:25.266 --> 00:06:25.591
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:06:25.806 --> 00:06:28.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the rest of it's a bit of a domestic disaster.

00:06:28.291 --> 00:06:28.567
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:06:29.627 --> 00:06:33.187
<v Jacob Paulsen>But John Quincy Adams was arguably one of the best presidents we've ever had.

00:06:33.187 --> 00:06:34.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, just an amazing human.

00:06:35.687 --> 00:06:39.107
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, you're right about that as far as – I mean, it's fascinating to get

00:06:39.107 --> 00:06:44.577
<v Riley Bowman>to know him as well too through this as a youngster and being – accompanying

00:06:44.577 --> 00:06:47.887
<v Riley Bowman>his dad overseas to France, to the Netherlands,

00:06:49.127 --> 00:06:51.027
<v Riley Bowman>to England, all over the place.

00:06:51.027 --> 00:06:54.667
<v Jacob Paulsen>I read a biography about him specifically. I'm going to look it up while you're talking.

00:06:54.667 --> 00:06:59.684
<v Riley Bowman>He got a heck of an education for a young man at an early age.

00:07:00.688 --> 00:07:02.967
<v Riley Bowman>And we should probably move on from this, get on to the episode.

00:07:02.967 --> 00:07:05.337
<v Riley Bowman>But it's been fun to kind of just talk about it for a minute.

00:07:05.337 --> 00:07:11.257
<v Riley Bowman>And, of course, you know, in light of our approaching 250th nation's birthday,

00:07:11.257 --> 00:07:12.523
<v Riley Bowman>I think this is all appropriate.

00:07:12.790 --> 00:07:17.847
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, here it is. It was just called John Quincy Adams by Harlow Giles Unger.

00:07:18.567 --> 00:07:20.107
<v Jacob Paulsen>Junger? I don't know. Fantastic.

00:07:20.837 --> 00:07:23.489
<v Jacob Paulsen>Fantastic. Yeah. I mean, this is a guy who...

00:07:26.113 --> 00:07:30.833
<v Jacob Paulsen>Watched The the the cannon go up on Dorchester Heights. Yeah from his from his

00:07:30.833 --> 00:07:32.923
<v Jacob Paulsen>hometown. Yeah, so yeah, like he

00:07:32.923 --> 00:07:39.843
<v Riley Bowman>Was there what he watched He really watched the creation of this nation.

00:07:39.843 --> 00:07:43.733
<v Riley Bowman>Yes through the eyes of a youngster up through a team Yeah, he was a goal to

00:07:43.733 --> 00:07:50.713
<v Riley Bowman>ultimately being the president right yeah being involved in Diplo diplomacy

00:07:50.713 --> 00:07:52.413
<v Riley Bowman>with the French and overseas.

00:07:52.413 --> 00:07:56.833
<v Jacob Paulsen>And he like his political failings were tied to the fact that he just wanted

00:07:56.833 --> 00:07:59.875
<v Jacob Paulsen>to do what was right and not align with the political party.

00:08:01.263 --> 00:08:06.034
<v Jacob Paulsen>He was really our last president who didn't just say, screw it.

00:08:06.983 --> 00:08:08.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>Just tell me what the party line is. Right.

00:08:09.080 --> 00:08:15.413
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. Well, it's been... Anyway, thanks for bringing up some of the books

00:08:15.413 --> 00:08:16.623
<v Riley Bowman>you read and that's what I'm up to.

00:08:16.983 --> 00:08:21.923
<v Riley Bowman>I hope to finish that maybe in the next week or so which would be just in time

00:08:21.923 --> 00:08:26.126
<v Riley Bowman>for Independence Day. And yeah, it's been good.

00:08:28.007 --> 00:08:32.503
<v Riley Bowman>Well, we got a little off track there, but hopefully through that,

00:08:32.503 --> 00:08:34.583
<v Riley Bowman>some of you can kind of see where our mind is at.

00:08:35.043 --> 00:08:38.863
<v Riley Bowman>And maybe there's some recommendations that you can take from that as well to,

00:08:38.863 --> 00:08:41.335
<v Riley Bowman>hey, go check out some of those books. They're great books.

00:08:42.003 --> 00:08:48.568
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think my message would be, what are you doing this year to up your Independence Day game?

00:08:48.882 --> 00:08:54.042
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah like whatever your normal July 4th like you know plan is for your family

00:08:54.367 --> 00:08:57.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>take it up a notch yeah that's what's going on in the Paulson households right

00:08:57.723 --> 00:09:01.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>now is like how do we take this up a level yeah

00:09:03.104 --> 00:09:06.651
<v Riley Bowman>And not just in terms of the amount of money we spend on fireworks.

00:09:07.115 --> 00:09:09.587
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, I don't spend any money on fireworks. Yeah, I know.

00:09:09.587 --> 00:09:10.817
<v Riley Bowman>I'm talking about some families.

00:09:10.817 --> 00:09:14.247
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sure, sure, sure. I mean, if that's what you got to do, if that's how you do

00:09:14.247 --> 00:09:17.347
<v Jacob Paulsen>it, that's fine. Yeah, no, true. But that's the point. Like,

00:09:17.347 --> 00:09:19.347
<v Jacob Paulsen>don't make it another July 4th. Yeah.

00:09:20.988 --> 00:09:25.967
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was not yet born on the 200th anniversary, and I will probably be dead on the 300th.

00:09:25.967 --> 00:09:26.346
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:09:26.723 --> 00:09:28.437
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is the big one in my lifetime.

00:09:28.437 --> 00:09:33.037
<v Riley Bowman>I hope to live to make that one, but we'll see. It's true. We probably will be dead.

00:09:33.037 --> 00:09:33.857
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is the big one.

00:09:33.857 --> 00:09:41.677
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Speaking of America, the World Cup, have you seen some of the news and

00:09:41.677 --> 00:09:45.557
<v Riley Bowman>stuff about foreigners coming here for World Cup games?

00:09:45.557 --> 00:09:47.017
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, all sorts of craziness.

00:09:47.017 --> 00:09:49.990
<v Riley Bowman>And how they're just like, wow, America's awesome.

00:09:51.522 --> 00:09:56.247
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, there's been several. So there's the whole ranch dressing drama.

00:09:56.509 --> 00:09:58.836
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, yeah, yeah. Some people lose their minds about ranch dressing.

00:09:59.504 --> 00:10:03.463
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then there's this tweet that's gone viral, like crazy viral.

00:10:04.327 --> 00:10:08.101
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's something like the most looked at tweet in like three years or something.

00:10:08.409 --> 00:10:14.687
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's basically a guy exclaiming how the local Chili's restaurant gave him free chips and salsa.

00:10:16.507 --> 00:10:18.507
<v Jacob Paulsen>Without any evidence he could pay the bill yet.

00:10:23.467 --> 00:10:26.797
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. Like the honor. Free chips and salsa. The honor. I think he was from Japan,

00:10:26.797 --> 00:10:30.697
<v Jacob Paulsen>so you would relate to this. but you know like that the america would just assume

00:10:30.697 --> 00:10:32.847
<v Jacob Paulsen>such the such honor people yeah

00:10:32.847 --> 00:10:37.227
<v Riley Bowman>You know yeah yeah free free drink refills i mean people have been you know

00:10:37.227 --> 00:10:42.506
<v Riley Bowman>of course people have been discovering bucky's and walmart and i mean yeah.

00:10:42.790 --> 00:10:44.417
<v Jacob Paulsen>So welcome welcome it's

00:10:44.417 --> 00:10:45.345
<v Riley Bowman>Been fun to see,

00:10:46.291 --> 00:10:51.260
<v Riley Bowman>Anyway, let's get into the episode, but we do have a quick little sponsorship message.

00:10:51.759 --> 00:10:56.618
<v Riley Bowman>We have upcoming our big annual Independence Day sale.

00:10:57.013 --> 00:11:01.895
<v Riley Bowman>Happy Birthday America sale. This will be our happy 250th birthday sale. It'll be a big one.

00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:06.365
<v Riley Bowman>We've done this annual sale for quite a few years now.

00:11:07.177 --> 00:11:12.440
<v Riley Bowman>And looking forward to kicking this off. Well, it'll be next week at some point.

00:11:12.440 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Riley Bowman>Do you know what day we're kicking that off on?

00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:19.940
<v Jacob Paulsen>July 4th. It's a Saturday. I think the sale will start on Thursday for Guardian

00:11:19.940 --> 00:11:22.120
<v Jacob Paulsen>Nation members, Friday for everyone else.

00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:27.261
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, so July 2nd for Guardian Nation members, July 3rd for everybody else.

00:11:27.459 --> 00:11:30.050
<v Riley Bowman>And there's another distinction there too is that Guardian Nation members are

00:11:30.050 --> 00:11:32.074
<v Riley Bowman>always going to save more than anybody else.

00:11:32.497 --> 00:11:38.093
<v Riley Bowman>At the very least, you always get 10% off of everything we sell, right?

00:11:38.215 --> 00:11:38.413
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right.

00:11:38.651 --> 00:11:42.267
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's true all the time. That's true during the sale.

00:11:42.563 --> 00:11:46.940
<v Riley Bowman>So next week, July 2nd, actually, when this episode gets published,

00:11:46.940 --> 00:11:52.391
<v Riley Bowman>it'll be a day or two after that maybe. But watch for details on concealedcarry.com

00:11:52.612 --> 00:11:55.247
<v Riley Bowman>with regards to our Happy Birthday America sale.

00:11:55.636 --> 00:12:00.240
<v Riley Bowman>They'll be taking place starting Thursday, Friday, running through the weekend

00:12:00.580 --> 00:12:05.505
<v Riley Bowman>of July 4th for celebration of our nation's 250th birthday.

00:12:06.520 --> 00:12:09.740
<v Riley Bowman>More details to come. You'll see it on the site or if you're on our email list,

00:12:09.740 --> 00:12:11.960
<v Riley Bowman>you'll get emailed certainly about it as well.

00:12:12.337 --> 00:12:15.465
<v Riley Bowman>Make sure you're a Guardian Nation member, too. If you want to save the most,

00:12:15.731 --> 00:12:19.870
<v Riley Bowman>you can join easily by going to GuardianNation.com and then get set up.

00:12:19.870 --> 00:12:23.869
<v Riley Bowman>And then you can take full advantage of the biggest sale of the year that we do.

00:12:24.421 --> 00:12:29.070
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, there's going to be a special bonus thing that you're not going to want

00:12:29.070 --> 00:12:35.080
<v Jacob Paulsen>to miss out on, as well as other incentives to be a member of Guardian Nation. So get on it. Yeah, yeah.

00:12:35.428 --> 00:12:38.145
<v Riley Bowman>The incentive is really, really cool. So you guys will want to check that out.

00:12:39.498 --> 00:12:46.575
<v Riley Bowman>There you go. Let's get into today's episode. It's a legislative updates episode this time, Jacob.

00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:50.924
<v Riley Bowman>And we've got a number of pretty interesting stories, including some breaking

00:12:50.924 --> 00:12:54.847
<v Riley Bowman>news, which I'm not going to spill all the beans just yet on that. But stay tuned.

00:12:55.265 --> 00:12:59.974
<v Riley Bowman>As of when I was doing preparation for this episode, some news has changed,

00:12:59.974 --> 00:13:01.054
<v Riley Bowman>meaning that the Supreme Court

00:13:01.054 --> 00:13:06.253
<v Riley Bowman>has just announced as of a couple of hours ago, another major ruling.

00:13:06.573 --> 00:13:09.377
<v Riley Bowman>So we'll cover that as well today. So stay tuned for that.

00:13:09.882 --> 00:13:15.679
<v Riley Bowman>But first, we're going to lead off with a story about how the Supreme Court ruled on the U.S.

00:13:15.679 --> 00:13:20.734
<v Riley Bowman>Versus Himani case, which is a very interesting case. And I'll tell you,

00:13:20.734 --> 00:13:25.472
<v Riley Bowman>there were some people who were like, why this case? Because it's a case littered with all kinds of,

00:13:26.621 --> 00:13:32.191
<v Riley Bowman>dirt. It's a dirty case. It's not the ideal. It's not a Bruin, for instance.

00:13:32.191 --> 00:13:33.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, it's not setting some big precedent.

00:13:33.891 --> 00:13:36.511
<v Riley Bowman>It's not McDonald's. It's not Heller.

00:13:36.971 --> 00:13:42.321
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, it sort of stirs the drink a little bit, but it doesn't clear up a lot.

00:13:42.321 --> 00:13:45.541
<v Riley Bowman>And that's really what I want to talk about today is what the Himani case really,

00:13:45.541 --> 00:13:47.374
<v Riley Bowman>what this ruling really is about.

00:13:48.791 --> 00:13:52.181
<v Riley Bowman>It's kind of a big deal, but also kind of not a big deal. So Jacob,

00:13:52.181 --> 00:13:55.361
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, you wrote an article on the site about this. You guys can see it on

00:13:55.361 --> 00:14:00.644
<v Riley Bowman>concealedcarry.com about marijuana and gun rights so what's the deal with him on a case.

00:14:01.039 --> 00:14:05.691
<v Jacob Paulsen>So the background is this guy basically um is under suspicion of stuff and he

00:14:05.691 --> 00:14:09.881
<v Jacob Paulsen>submits to a search so he you know allows for a search to take place at his

00:14:09.881 --> 00:14:15.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>residence and that search turns up some marijuana as well as a gun among other things

00:14:15.660 --> 00:14:20.583
<v Jacob Paulsen>and so you know charges are filed because hey you can't be in possession of

00:14:21.047 --> 00:14:25.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>this drug uh you know that's at a federal level you know a drug this the fbi

00:14:25.721 --> 00:14:29.091
<v Jacob Paulsen>conducting right the search right as well as a gun like that's though you know

00:14:29.091 --> 00:14:33.238
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's a no go so we're going to charge you with possession you know blah blah blah

00:14:33.650 --> 00:14:38.892
<v Riley Bowman>I think he even specifically like told agents when asked that he used marijuana every other day.

00:14:39.147 --> 00:14:39.884
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah yeah

00:14:40.053 --> 00:14:43.501
<v Riley Bowman>I mean there's there's a lesson right there and far as you know like.

00:14:44.211 --> 00:14:48.991
<v Jacob Paulsen>Don't submit to searches don't admit anything kind of thing talk

00:14:48.991 --> 00:14:49.621
<v Riley Bowman>To an attorney.

00:14:49.621 --> 00:14:52.151
<v Jacob Paulsen>Kind of thing he's got an attorney now i can tell you that Yeah,

00:14:52.151 --> 00:14:54.316
<v Jacob Paulsen>yeah, yeah, his attorneys are all over this.

00:14:55.070 --> 00:14:58.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I always find it, okay, sorry, that's, that's a side note.

00:14:58.721 --> 00:15:01.771
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, so anyway, long story short,

00:15:02.431 --> 00:15:06.059
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, he appeals this, this, this, these charges, this conviction,

00:15:06.640 --> 00:15:12.121
<v Jacob Paulsen>it goes up through a number of courts to basically all uphold it until it gets

00:15:12.121 --> 00:15:15.299
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court says, no.

00:15:16.338 --> 00:15:20.141
<v Jacob Paulsen>And their ruling is relatively narrow.

00:15:20.581 --> 00:15:25.997
<v Jacob Paulsen>Their ruling is not, you can smoke weed, it's fine. And the ruling is not,

00:15:26.467 --> 00:15:28.209
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can have marijuana and a gun, that's fine.

00:15:29.641 --> 00:15:33.021
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's not the ruling. The decision, as it's written, is basically

00:15:35.101 --> 00:15:37.451
<v Jacob Paulsen>that the state, the prosecutor, whatever you want to call it,

00:15:37.451 --> 00:15:43.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>they failed to demonstrably show that the use of marijuana made this man a danger.

00:15:43.935 --> 00:15:48.892
<v Jacob Paulsen>And therefore that stands up to the Bruin standard to take away his rights.

00:15:49.561 --> 00:15:50.512
<v Jacob Paulsen>Let me word this in a different way.

00:15:53.217 --> 00:15:56.885
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's funny because sometimes I think the Supreme Court, they only care about

00:15:56.885 --> 00:16:00.223
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Bruin decision when it's convenient, and other times they seem to ignore it.

00:16:00.409 --> 00:16:07.335
<v Jacob Paulsen>But in short, basically what the decision says is the standard that allows you

00:16:07.335 --> 00:16:10.857
<v Jacob Paulsen>to take away someone's Second Amendment rights is pretty high.

00:16:11.339 --> 00:16:15.216
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's a couple of ways to take away someone's rights. None of them are easy,

00:16:15.559 --> 00:16:18.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>and that's the point of Bruin. One of them is sort of this historical thing

00:16:18.075 --> 00:16:21.213
<v Jacob Paulsen>like, hey, you have to show that there's some historical analog for this.

00:16:21.840 --> 00:16:25.590
<v Jacob Paulsen>But another way you can have your rights taken away, your Second Amendment rights,

00:16:25.892 --> 00:16:27.987
<v Jacob Paulsen>is if you're demonstrably dangerous.

00:16:29.315 --> 00:16:35.354
<v Jacob Paulsen>You having a gun is a dangerous thing. And the courts in this case,

00:16:35.895 --> 00:16:40.068
<v Jacob Paulsen>the prosecutors, for lack of a better word, they were going with both of those.

00:16:40.416 --> 00:16:43.575
<v Jacob Paulsen>They were saying, well, historically, drunkards were a problem.

00:16:44.595 --> 00:16:49.054
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's some historical tradition of not allowing drunkards to have a gun. How is that different?

00:16:49.611 --> 00:16:56.275
<v Jacob Paulsen>And they were also taking the angle of possession of a class whatever drug is

00:16:56.275 --> 00:16:58.835
<v Jacob Paulsen>inherently makes you a danger to yourself or others.

00:16:59.485 --> 00:17:01.445
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the Supreme Court basically looked at both of those and said,

00:17:01.445 --> 00:17:04.628
<v Jacob Paulsen>first off, this historical analogy about drunkards is silly on its surface.

00:17:06.115 --> 00:17:11.435
<v Jacob Paulsen>Don't waste our time. And then secondly, the occasional or regular use of marijuana

00:17:11.685 --> 00:17:15.755
<v Jacob Paulsen>does not demonstrably show that someone is a danger to themselves or others,

00:17:15.755 --> 00:17:18.935
<v Jacob Paulsen>and therefore that is insufficient to take away their second member rights.

00:17:19.835 --> 00:17:25.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this does not remove the drug or marijuana question from the 4473.

00:17:26.134 --> 00:17:28.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>This does not change federal law.

00:17:28.398 --> 00:17:34.535
<v Jacob Paulsen>This simply says that in this case, this dude's use of marijuana did not in

00:17:34.535 --> 00:17:38.685
<v Jacob Paulsen>any way demonstrably show he was dangerous to himself or others.

00:17:38.685 --> 00:17:42.817
<v Jacob Paulsen>And therefore, that doesn't meet the standard to remove his Second Amendment rights.

00:17:42.980 --> 00:17:47.885
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Right. And so it is important to understand that, you know,

00:17:47.885 --> 00:17:49.895
<v Riley Bowman>that distinction there of, you,

00:17:50.805 --> 00:17:57.601
<v Riley Bowman>the laws still stand you know 18 us code 922 g3 which is what the statute that

00:17:57.601 --> 00:18:01.753
<v Riley Bowman>this falls under is that still it like that has been unaffected,

00:18:02.252 --> 00:18:07.461
<v Riley Bowman>um the form 4473 is still a thing the question will likely still remain although

00:18:07.461 --> 00:18:12.851
<v Riley Bowman>i mean the atf at any time the trump administration could change that um but the the question as,

00:18:13.311 --> 00:18:18.743
<v Riley Bowman>as right now still remains and the question is basically you know Are you an unlawful user,

00:18:19.231 --> 00:18:21.988
<v Riley Bowman>of marijuana or other illicit drugs?

00:18:22.811 --> 00:18:29.523
<v Riley Bowman>And so you still need to, when filling out that form, fill it out truthfully if you're not going.

00:18:29.865 --> 00:18:30.641
<v Jacob Paulsen>To lie on the form as a

00:18:30.641 --> 00:18:36.451
<v Riley Bowman>Felony. Right, right. Which, by the way, is one of the charges that Hunter Biden

00:18:36.451 --> 00:18:42.811
<v Riley Bowman>was convicted under was lying on the 4473 when he purchased his gun back in 2018.

00:18:43.298 --> 00:18:48.991
<v Riley Bowman>He was also convicted of being a habitual, or I can't remember the exact word

00:18:48.991 --> 00:18:53.011
<v Riley Bowman>that was used, but he was also convicted for the use of drugs and having a drug

00:18:53.011 --> 00:18:55.500
<v Riley Bowman>problem while also owning and possessing a gun.

00:18:55.936 --> 00:18:59.883
<v Riley Bowman>But he was, I think the bigger thing was that he lied specifically on that form.

00:19:00.086 --> 00:19:01.450
<v Riley Bowman>So that's still a thing is my point.

00:19:01.884 --> 00:19:07.475
<v Riley Bowman>And so you're going to want to, as far as how this affects you or any of us,

00:19:07.910 --> 00:19:14.391
<v Riley Bowman>is probably talk to an attorney that understands the laws for your particular

00:19:14.391 --> 00:19:16.838
<v Riley Bowman>jurisdiction, the state or whatever that you live in,

00:19:18.071 --> 00:19:23.740
<v Riley Bowman>as far as how it is appropriate to answer questions like what's found on the 4473.

00:19:25.290 --> 00:19:29.071
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you live in a state where you can buy guns privately without a 4473,

00:19:29.071 --> 00:19:30.201
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's probably a better plan.

00:19:31.102 --> 00:19:35.436
<v Jacob Paulsen>Assuming you're, I mean, for all of us, let alone someone who's medicinally

00:19:35.436 --> 00:19:36.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>or recreationally using marijuana.

00:19:37.070 --> 00:19:41.106
<v Riley Bowman>But it would seem to also suggest, though, that, and nothing's a for sure thing

00:19:41.106 --> 00:19:47.706
<v Riley Bowman>here is kind of a point, but that if you are an occasional user of things like

00:19:47.706 --> 00:19:49.475
<v Riley Bowman>marijuana and also a gun owner,

00:19:50.723 --> 00:19:54.827
<v Riley Bowman>I think this makes it a lot more difficult for you to get charged. Yes.

00:19:54.984 --> 00:19:58.873
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, and one of the things that came up in the decision as it was written,

00:19:59.274 --> 00:20:04.456
<v Jacob Paulsen>and this is an anonymous ruling by the Supreme Court, though not all of them

00:20:04.787 --> 00:20:06.389
<v Jacob Paulsen>agreed for the same reasons.

00:20:06.952 --> 00:20:08.616
<v Riley Bowman>Unanimous. I think you said anonymous.

00:20:08.616 --> 00:20:10.366
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, I said anonymous? Unanimous.

00:20:10.786 --> 00:20:11.566
<v Riley Bowman>Which was pretty notable.

00:20:11.566 --> 00:20:13.576
<v Jacob Paulsen>Unfortunately, not anonymous. We know who they are.

00:20:13.576 --> 00:20:13.884
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:20:14.232 --> 00:20:17.026
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it was unanimous. Thank you. But not for the same reasons.

00:20:17.706 --> 00:20:22.666
<v Jacob Paulsen>Is X number of judges agreed with this decision, and then the other three still

00:20:22.666 --> 00:20:24.600
<v Jacob Paulsen>agreed with the decision, but for these other reasons.

00:20:24.936 --> 00:20:28.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you read the majority decision as it's written, the other thing that they

00:20:28.126 --> 00:20:33.146
<v Jacob Paulsen>mention is that if this drug, if marijuana is the kind of thing that makes people

00:20:33.146 --> 00:20:37.730
<v Jacob Paulsen>so dangerous, then why did the federal government recently change its classification

00:20:39.066 --> 00:20:40.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>from whatever type?

00:20:40.486 --> 00:20:43.926
<v Jacob Paulsen>Schedule 1 to Schedule 3. So that also came up in the decision,

00:20:43.926 --> 00:20:45.857
<v Jacob Paulsen>and I think that's relevant.

00:20:47.547 --> 00:20:52.093
<v Riley Bowman>Very much so. Yeah, we have a comment there from somebody asking something about Biden.

00:20:53.133 --> 00:20:55.433
<v Riley Bowman>I think you're trying to say was acquitted of these charges,

00:20:55.433 --> 00:20:58.643
<v Riley Bowman>but I think what you may mean is he was convicted of those charges,

00:20:58.643 --> 00:21:02.058
<v Riley Bowman>but then later pardoned by conveniently his father. But anyway.

00:21:02.273 --> 00:21:04.333
<v Jacob Paulsen>Works out really well when your dad can pardon you. Yeah.

00:21:06.429 --> 00:21:11.403
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, there you go. That's the Himani ruling. So if you have questions

00:21:11.403 --> 00:21:14.063
<v Riley Bowman>about that, talk to our attorney because we can't be your attorneys for you.

00:21:15.090 --> 00:21:20.523
<v Riley Bowman>So let's go now to the next one here, Jacob. This was actually a story from

00:21:20.523 --> 00:21:22.213
<v Riley Bowman>The Reload, which is a great blog.

00:21:22.713 --> 00:21:26.166
<v Riley Bowman>I've referenced that. We've referenced it on the podcast a few times over the years as well.

00:21:26.903 --> 00:21:33.653
<v Riley Bowman>Basically kind of a summary over a number of cases that are going before the

00:21:33.653 --> 00:21:37.509
<v Riley Bowman>Supreme Court and being denied or whatever.

00:21:37.875 --> 00:21:42.663
<v Riley Bowman>Because what recently happened was the Supreme Court declined to take on two

00:21:42.663 --> 00:21:47.732
<v Riley Bowman>New York cases. Now, to be clear, both of these cases were in the preliminary injunction phase.

00:21:48.306 --> 00:21:51.043
<v Riley Bowman>So it was one of those things where, like one of them, by the way,

00:21:51.043 --> 00:21:55.946
<v Riley Bowman>is dealing with the New York gun carry training requirements.

00:21:56.338 --> 00:22:01.243
<v Riley Bowman>The other one had to do with gun industry liability, which are both things that

00:22:01.243 --> 00:22:02.666
<v Riley Bowman>New York has tried to make stricter.

00:22:02.962 --> 00:22:05.951
<v Riley Bowman>Or in the case of gun industry liability, they've tried to make it,

00:22:06.816 --> 00:22:12.987
<v Riley Bowman>they passed a law, basically provides a route for people to sue gun makers for,

00:22:13.897 --> 00:22:19.262
<v Riley Bowman>And, of course, that shouldn't be the case under federal law. Right.

00:22:19.262 --> 00:22:22.343
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, just like marijuana shouldn't be legal under federal law. Right.

00:22:22.518 --> 00:22:26.459
<v Riley Bowman>And so both of those cases is the sort of thing where,

00:22:28.282 --> 00:22:32.942
<v Riley Bowman>the folks arguing those cases, the plaintiffs were trying to get preliminary

00:22:32.942 --> 00:22:35.637
<v Riley Bowman>injunctions and trying to get the Supreme Court to,

00:22:36.467 --> 00:22:40.368
<v Riley Bowman>put a stop on the enforcement or implementation of those laws before,

00:22:40.763 --> 00:22:43.805
<v Riley Bowman>you know, so that while they work their way through the court.

00:22:44.722 --> 00:22:47.872
<v Riley Bowman>Through the court system. And instead, the Supreme Court, which by the way,

00:22:47.872 --> 00:22:50.712
<v Riley Bowman>this is nothing particularly surprising for the Supreme Court.

00:22:50.712 --> 00:22:56.522
<v Riley Bowman>They're usually pretty careful about enforcing or putting in place preliminary

00:22:56.522 --> 00:22:58.345
<v Riley Bowman>injunctions or allowing them to stand,

00:22:59.042 --> 00:23:03.132
<v Riley Bowman>and getting themselves inserted into cases before they actually make their way

00:23:03.132 --> 00:23:06.147
<v Riley Bowman>through the system through all the different procedures, if you will.

00:23:06.681 --> 00:23:10.466
<v Riley Bowman>And so in this case, neither of those cases were accepted by the Supreme Court

00:23:10.738 --> 00:23:13.507
<v Riley Bowman>to hear them on the merits of those preliminary injunctions.

00:23:13.740 --> 00:23:16.874
<v Riley Bowman>They just send them back down to those lower courts to do their thing.

00:23:18.082 --> 00:23:22.672
<v Riley Bowman>But then it also in this article talks about how there's a number of other cases

00:23:22.672 --> 00:23:25.582
<v Riley Bowman>that are basically sitting on the docket, so to speak.

00:23:26.402 --> 00:23:30.772
<v Riley Bowman>There's 25 other, well, let's see. Simultaneously, it says the Supreme Court

00:23:30.772 --> 00:23:34.332
<v Riley Bowman>accepted four new Second Amendment challenges and relisted 25 others.

00:23:34.332 --> 00:23:40.199
<v Riley Bowman>In other words, there's 29 Second Amendment cases now pending in the Supreme Court in their books.

00:23:40.646 --> 00:23:43.989
<v Riley Bowman>That's pretty interesting. It's a pretty big deal. We know that, go ahead.

00:23:44.762 --> 00:23:50.224
<v Jacob Paulsen>In context, I don't know how many cases total are pending with the Supreme Court,

00:23:50.578 --> 00:23:52.870
<v Jacob Paulsen>but the Supreme Court has got a massive docket.

00:23:53.102 --> 00:23:55.639
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. And I think that's part of the context that you have to take,

00:23:56.068 --> 00:23:58.623
<v Jacob Paulsen>and that's exactly kind of what you're building up to, is this idea that,

00:23:59.662 --> 00:24:00.759
<v Jacob Paulsen>yeah, they can't take them all.

00:24:00.927 --> 00:24:01.142
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:24:01.403 --> 00:24:05.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>So for them to deny this or deny that one is not the end of the world.

00:24:05.205 --> 00:24:09.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>I also think that there's a hierarchy here in the pro-gun world.

00:24:10.704 --> 00:24:14.158
<v Jacob Paulsen>Rights battle versus the anti-gun rights battle.

00:24:14.372 --> 00:24:21.129
<v Jacob Paulsen>And what I mean by a hierarchy is like we generally want to focus on the biggest fish to fry.

00:24:21.867 --> 00:24:25.884
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm less concerned, and I think that the gun rights community generally is

00:24:26.226 --> 00:24:30.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>less concerned that some states require some amount of training in order to

00:24:30.917 --> 00:24:34.557
<v Jacob Paulsen>obtain a concealed carry permit or potentially a gun permit.

00:24:34.557 --> 00:24:35.659
<v Jacob Paulsen>We can come back to that one in a minute.

00:24:36.547 --> 00:24:41.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>Than I am that states are making my AR-15 outright illegal.

00:24:42.033 --> 00:24:44.738
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's sort of like, okay, where are we going to focus our time?

00:24:45.667 --> 00:24:47.577
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm more concerned that 18-, 19-,

00:24:47.577 --> 00:24:51.256
<v Jacob Paulsen>and 20-year-olds don't have full Second Amendment rights in some states.

00:24:52.127 --> 00:24:56.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I think that you see that too from the Supreme Court side is they have to

00:24:56.117 --> 00:24:58.396
<v Jacob Paulsen>look at all the things coming before them and sort of say,

00:24:58.948 --> 00:25:02.237
<v Jacob Paulsen>what are the battles that we're – what are the most important things for us

00:25:02.237 --> 00:25:05.967
<v Jacob Paulsen>to settle, to sort through, to deal with, And one of the things that are sort

00:25:05.967 --> 00:25:09.967
<v Jacob Paulsen>of like, eh, maybe down the road we can come back to that, but right now it

00:25:09.967 --> 00:25:12.415
<v Jacob Paulsen>just is not, like that's a small fish.

00:25:12.903 --> 00:25:17.187
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Yeah, and to give, you know, to kind of build off further what you were

00:25:17.187 --> 00:25:20.206
<v Riley Bowman>just explaining, some of the bigger fish that we're talking about here.

00:25:21.252 --> 00:25:25.722
<v Riley Bowman>You know, included in these 29 cases that are currently sitting within the Supreme

00:25:25.722 --> 00:25:31.102
<v Riley Bowman>Court's docket, so to speak, is our cases that are dealing with semi-automatic

00:25:31.102 --> 00:25:34.468
<v Riley Bowman>firearms and rifles, particularly like AR-15 style rifles,

00:25:35.728 --> 00:25:37.690
<v Riley Bowman>magazine capacity limitations.

00:25:38.692 --> 00:25:40.232
<v Riley Bowman>Those are probably the two really big ones.

00:25:40.292 --> 00:25:41.362
<v Jacob Paulsen>Several of both of those.

00:25:41.362 --> 00:25:46.912
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, several, several. And so, and those are, I would also say, bigger fish.

00:25:47.372 --> 00:25:56.132
<v Riley Bowman>These are really, really landmark type cases if they make their way through

00:25:56.132 --> 00:26:00.212
<v Riley Bowman>the full Supreme Court process, having a hearing, arguments,

00:26:00.212 --> 00:26:02.255
<v Riley Bowman>all of that, and eventually a ruling.

00:26:02.528 --> 00:26:07.439
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, Justice Kavanaugh, we know a year or so ago, indicated,

00:26:08.252 --> 00:26:12.472
<v Riley Bowman>that, hey, we anticipate, or he anticipates at least, that the Supreme Court

00:26:12.472 --> 00:26:19.062
<v Riley Bowman>would be addressing the AR-15 matter soon, like in the next term or two, which is a big deal.

00:26:19.062 --> 00:26:23.792
<v Riley Bowman>So I think that's what we're talking about here is the Supreme Court has to

00:26:23.792 --> 00:26:28.592
<v Riley Bowman>be a little picky and choosy about what they go after, what they accept,

00:26:28.592 --> 00:26:31.198
<v Riley Bowman>what they're going to actually take on.

00:26:31.992 --> 00:26:35.935
<v Riley Bowman>And there's some really big things that they have already agreed to hear.

00:26:36.752 --> 00:26:39.942
<v Jacob Paulsen>And them saying no to take on a case does not in any way mean that another case

00:26:39.942 --> 00:26:43.000
<v Jacob Paulsen>with similar fact pattern or question couldn't come later. Right.

00:26:43.832 --> 00:26:48.442
<v Riley Bowman>Or is that these cases they denied to take a look at right now won't eventually end up there anyway.

00:26:48.442 --> 00:26:51.612
<v Riley Bowman>Because again these were just preliminary injunctions they were asked to review,

00:26:52.952 --> 00:26:57.302
<v Riley Bowman>right uh not not the actual you know not even hearing the the the whole case

00:26:57.302 --> 00:27:03.107
<v Riley Bowman>the merits of the case you know just like yeah so uh these cases very likely could still end up there,

00:27:03.810 --> 00:27:07.202
<v Riley Bowman>agreed so anyway there you go just a little bit of an update on kind of the

00:27:07.202 --> 00:27:10.872
<v Riley Bowman>supreme court watch if you want to call it that and uh they've got a lot going

00:27:10.872 --> 00:27:14.201
<v Riley Bowman>on there and hopefully you know we see some more things,

00:27:14.914 --> 00:27:20.230
<v Riley Bowman>Big news. We teased this a little bit ago. Also referenced in this article is

00:27:20.230 --> 00:27:22.800
<v Riley Bowman>the Wolford versus Lopez case.

00:27:22.800 --> 00:27:26.780
<v Riley Bowman>This is the one out of Hawaii that is sometimes referred to as the vampire rule,

00:27:27.380 --> 00:27:30.890
<v Riley Bowman>which for those that don't understand, essentially the vampire rule is it like

00:27:30.890 --> 00:27:36.253
<v Riley Bowman>reverses the default of what we think of as concealed carry.

00:27:36.526 --> 00:27:42.063
<v Riley Bowman>So for pretty much most of us, we think that, okay, I'm going to assume,

00:27:42.429 --> 00:27:45.780
<v Riley Bowman>you know, we don't want to be careful with assumptions, but I am going to assume

00:27:45.780 --> 00:27:50.346
<v Riley Bowman>I can carry my gun pretty much anywhere unless it's explicitly,

00:27:50.950 --> 00:27:52.767
<v Riley Bowman>you know, prohibited, okay?

00:27:52.976 --> 00:27:56.880
<v Riley Bowman>So by state to state to state or sometimes smaller jurisdictions than that,

00:27:56.880 --> 00:28:00.632
<v Riley Bowman>but government office buildings or this or that, whatever, right?

00:28:01.300 --> 00:28:05.387
<v Riley Bowman>So I'm going to assume I can carry it anywhere other than those prohibited places.

00:28:06.660 --> 00:28:13.740
<v Riley Bowman>And places like businesses, for instance, private businesses that post or say,

00:28:13.740 --> 00:28:14.920
<v Riley Bowman>hey, I don't want guns here kind of thing.

00:28:14.920 --> 00:28:20.120
<v Riley Bowman>Like, I will assume I can carry into a place of business unless they tell me

00:28:20.120 --> 00:28:23.336
<v Riley Bowman>otherwise, right? That's like the normal default.

00:28:23.777 --> 00:28:27.533
<v Riley Bowman>And in Hawaii, they flipped that completely around where the default became

00:28:27.864 --> 00:28:31.567
<v Riley Bowman>with their new law that, oh, you cannot carry,

00:28:32.620 --> 00:28:40.500
<v Riley Bowman>on any private property, in any business location, anything, unless they explicitly,

00:28:41.660 --> 00:28:43.659
<v Riley Bowman>give you the permission to do so.

00:28:43.797 --> 00:28:44.058
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right.

00:28:44.470 --> 00:28:44.700
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:28:44.700 --> 00:28:46.860
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right and super awkward

00:28:47.866 --> 00:28:49.567
<v Riley Bowman>It basically makes it impossible.

00:28:49.962 --> 00:28:54.220
<v Jacob Paulsen>To carry it's it's terrible anywhere it's terrible i i it's terrible for us

00:28:54.220 --> 00:28:59.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>from our perspective right as gun owners and gun right people because um i i

00:28:59.610 --> 00:29:02.890
<v Jacob Paulsen>think of it true like in terms of like business and corporate decisions like if you're

00:29:03.917 --> 00:29:10.372
<v Jacob Paulsen>walmart yep you know you're kroger foods you're i don't care it's sunglasses hut

00:29:11.620 --> 00:29:14.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>and you have retail locations all over the place

00:29:16.817 --> 00:29:21.339
<v Jacob Paulsen>excluding this hawaii drama then you basically had the choice to just be neutral

00:29:21.693 --> 00:29:25.507
<v Jacob Paulsen>right like we're just going to be neutral yep like we're not like just leave

00:29:25.507 --> 00:29:29.537
<v Jacob Paulsen>us out of this like and that was good business sense for me like to me

00:29:30.037 --> 00:29:34.587
<v Jacob Paulsen>my perspective is like that's the right move like you have you have nothing

00:29:34.587 --> 00:29:38.007
<v Jacob Paulsen>to do with this gun debate you're a company that sells a product so stay out

00:29:38.007 --> 00:29:42.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>of it yep but hawaii is now going is basically flipped us around but the burden like

00:29:42.728 --> 00:29:45.921
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can't be neutral We've removed your neutrality.

00:29:46.170 --> 00:29:49.987
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've made you anti. If you want to be pro-gun, come out and say it.

00:29:49.987 --> 00:29:54.815
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, you have to take a stance. Yeah. You've got to post it or whatever, right? Yeah.

00:29:55.557 --> 00:30:00.567
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, that's what Hawaii did. Okay, so as of the preparation that we did earlier

00:30:00.567 --> 00:30:06.277
<v Riley Bowman>for the podcast today, we knew that that Olford versus Lopez case was pending

00:30:06.597 --> 00:30:09.733
<v Riley Bowman>and was expecting to be ruled upon at any time.

00:30:10.145 --> 00:30:12.799
<v Riley Bowman>And that came through as of just a few hours ago.

00:30:12.920 --> 00:30:13.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah.

00:30:13.436 --> 00:30:19.627
<v Riley Bowman>And in a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court has rejected that law.

00:30:19.627 --> 00:30:21.564
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, they said that's unconstitutional. I can't do that.

00:30:22.650 --> 00:30:26.394
<v Jacob Paulsen>Which makes absolute sense. That's the right call. I mean, the fact that there's

00:30:26.394 --> 00:30:28.654
<v Jacob Paulsen>three dissenters, I would love to see their dissenting opinion.

00:30:28.654 --> 00:30:33.076
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's like, how do you justify thinking that this could be constitutional? Like,

00:30:35.334 --> 00:30:40.274
<v Jacob Paulsen>what possible perspective could you think that someone's Second Amendment right,

00:30:40.274 --> 00:30:46.514
<v Jacob Paulsen>right, straight from the Bill of Rights, is default off unless somebody says

00:30:46.514 --> 00:30:48.939
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can have it? Like, that's crazy.

00:30:49.339 --> 00:30:53.159
<v Jacob Paulsen>So yeah this is this was i think this was one of those rulings that sort of felt like

00:30:53.588 --> 00:30:57.504
<v Jacob Paulsen>obvious like yeah like this one should go this way like i mean what the ar-15

00:30:57.504 --> 00:31:02.454
<v Jacob Paulsen>thing i we all have some bias because of our level of knowledge or education

00:31:02.454 --> 00:31:04.717
<v Jacob Paulsen>and obviously our pro-gun leanings

00:31:05.053 --> 00:31:10.191
<v Jacob Paulsen>but this vampire rule is like crazy stuff it's like what how do you get away with this

00:31:10.835 --> 00:31:12.974
<v Jacob Paulsen>so they're not getting away with it anymore

00:31:12.974 --> 00:31:17.854
<v Riley Bowman>It's done yep there you go there you have it so that's exciting breaking news

00:31:17.854 --> 00:31:21.551
<v Riley Bowman>as of just a couple hours ago so very very,

00:31:22.346 --> 00:31:25.374
<v Riley Bowman>cool to see that ruling from the supreme court because again that just effectively

00:31:25.374 --> 00:31:31.244
<v Riley Bowman>removes your ability to really carry anywhere except for like on a public an actual public.

00:31:31.244 --> 00:31:36.984
<v Jacob Paulsen>Street sure sure yeah but otherwise forget it yep there's no world walmart's

00:31:36.984 --> 00:31:40.172
<v Jacob Paulsen>gonna go put up a bunch of guns welcome here yeah yeah exactly

00:31:42.272 --> 00:31:48.442
<v Riley Bowman>Another interesting story, another interesting restriction out of California

00:31:48.442 --> 00:31:50.452
<v Riley Bowman>this time, Contra Costa County.

00:31:50.649 --> 00:31:53.662
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, geez. Jacob, give us a lowdown on this one. This was, again,

00:31:53.662 --> 00:31:56.808
<v Riley Bowman>another article that you published to the site recently.

00:31:58.004 --> 00:32:00.012
<v Riley Bowman>When I saw this, I'm like, what?

00:32:00.512 --> 00:32:05.992
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is the epitome of ignorance. And this is one of those things that I didn't even know was going on.

00:32:06.445 --> 00:32:09.184
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sometimes I think of myself as being highly informed.

00:32:09.772 --> 00:32:12.652
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm like, this is concealed carry stuff. Like this is my job.

00:32:12.652 --> 00:32:15.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is what I do for a living. I know what all the different states are doing.

00:32:16.692 --> 00:32:18.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>I know all the things, man.

00:32:18.966 --> 00:32:22.786
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then you see something like this and you're like, how long has this been going on?

00:32:23.058 --> 00:32:27.348
<v Jacob Paulsen>How did I not know about this? Like what the crap? So here's the deal.

00:32:27.992 --> 00:32:33.492
<v Jacob Paulsen>This one county in California, Contra Costa. I don't even know how to pronounce it.

00:32:34.212 --> 00:32:36.821
<v Jacob Paulsen>Contra Costa County. I don't even know where it is.

00:32:37.059 --> 00:32:38.942
<v Riley Bowman>Contra Costa, Contra Costa.

00:32:38.942 --> 00:32:41.132
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, there's some county in California with this name.

00:32:41.132 --> 00:32:42.522
<v Riley Bowman>I had never heard of it until this.

00:32:42.522 --> 00:32:46.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I Googled it when I wrote this article. I'm like, where is this county?

00:32:47.177 --> 00:32:55.302
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, in that county, they have imposed some rules regulating concealed carry

00:32:55.302 --> 00:33:00.633
<v Jacob Paulsen>permits that anyone listening to this podcast, this is going to blow your mind.

00:33:01.504 --> 00:33:04.998
<v Jacob Paulsen>They, one, do not allow pistol-mounted optics.

00:33:06.409 --> 00:33:10.492
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm not kidding. like you you go to get a concealed carry permit in that county

00:33:10.492 --> 00:33:14.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>and they will tell you like piss no no carry optics yeah like not like if you

00:33:14.822 --> 00:33:17.700
<v Jacob Paulsen>if we you if we find out you put an optic on your pistol

00:33:18.808 --> 00:33:25.867
<v Jacob Paulsen>it invalidates your permit like crazy stuff like hardcore ignorance but i'm not done

00:33:28.416 --> 00:33:32.235
<v Jacob Paulsen>this is crazy um second weapon mounted lights or lasers

00:33:34.314 --> 00:33:37.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, you can't put a, like, we don't want you to see what you're shooting at.

00:33:38.104 --> 00:33:43.491
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, I don't know. How do you justify that? Like, I cannot wrap my mind around

00:33:43.491 --> 00:33:48.483
<v Jacob Paulsen>what even the most ignorant person would be thinking to say you can't put a light on your gun.

00:33:49.447 --> 00:33:55.131
<v Jacob Paulsen>I got nothing. And maybe they think that, like, I don't know. I can't even.

00:33:57.202 --> 00:33:59.536
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, but that's not it. There's a third one.

00:34:02.113 --> 00:34:06.798
<v Jacob Paulsen>No single action only trigger guns yeah so

00:34:07.631 --> 00:34:13.143
<v Jacob Paulsen>that would make most of us just basically say no 1911s or 2011 uh type guns

00:34:13.770 --> 00:34:15.343
<v Jacob Paulsen>nothing nothing single action only

00:34:16.010 --> 00:34:21.411
<v Jacob Paulsen>so like that gun that you know conquered the world for like 50 years from you

00:34:21.411 --> 00:34:23.191
<v Jacob Paulsen>know put your hand on your heart and say john moses browning

00:34:25.178 --> 00:34:28.630
<v Jacob Paulsen>That would not be allowed to carry with your permit in that county.

00:34:28.863 --> 00:34:30.018
<v Jacob Paulsen>And here's the real irony.

00:34:30.418 --> 00:34:34.335
<v Jacob Paulsen>Remember that in California, like many states, including our state,

00:34:34.869 --> 00:34:38.062
<v Jacob Paulsen>the permits are issued at the county level, but they're statewide permits.

00:34:38.759 --> 00:34:43.958
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you got your permit from Placer County, see how I did that?

00:34:43.958 --> 00:34:45.498
<v Jacob Paulsen>I just came up with a county in California.

00:34:45.498 --> 00:34:47.188
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, and it's one, I know.

00:34:47.188 --> 00:34:51.288
<v Jacob Paulsen>From Yuma County. There's another one. If you got your permit from that county

00:34:51.288 --> 00:34:57.828
<v Jacob Paulsen>and you drove into Contra Costa County with your pistol-optic weapon-mounted

00:34:57.828 --> 00:35:01.078
<v Jacob Paulsen>light 1911, that'd be perfectly fine. They can't stop you.

00:35:01.698 --> 00:35:07.388
<v Jacob Paulsen>But if you live in this county, then you're not allowed to carry that gun or

00:35:07.388 --> 00:35:10.929
<v Jacob Paulsen>these accessories on your gun because that's the county's policy.

00:35:11.290 --> 00:35:14.227
<v Jacob Paulsen>So someone decided it's time to sue these boys over this one.

00:35:15.399 --> 00:35:21.958
<v Riley Bowman>Contra Costa County, by the way, is basically the northeast suburbs of San Francisco.

00:35:22.718 --> 00:35:24.668
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay, this is a Bay Area county.

00:35:24.668 --> 00:35:28.658
<v Riley Bowman>You're like, okay, it still doesn't make sense, but you're like, okay.

00:35:28.898 --> 00:35:32.428
<v Jacob Paulsen>I cannot matter this. This is truly one of those things. There's some things,

00:35:32.428 --> 00:35:36.244
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'll give you an example. There's a state that basically prohibits body armor.

00:35:36.859 --> 00:35:39.245
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's one of those things where it's like, clearly you're just ignorant.

00:35:39.715 --> 00:35:42.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>Not allowing suppressors. It's like, you're just ignorant.

00:35:42.738 --> 00:35:45.848
<v Jacob Paulsen>You clearly don't actually understand. You must think that someone can put on

00:35:45.848 --> 00:35:49.108
<v Jacob Paulsen>body armor and just run around and get shot and it won't even faze them.

00:35:49.108 --> 00:35:52.027
<v Jacob Paulsen>They'll just keep committing acts of violence. You know nothing.

00:35:52.225 --> 00:35:55.478
<v Jacob Paulsen>And same thing with the suppressor. You must think that bad guys are going to

00:35:55.478 --> 00:35:58.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>put suppressors on guns and run around and silently murder everybody.

00:36:00.618 --> 00:36:04.718
<v Jacob Paulsen>You're just ignorant. But how do you justify saying no pistol mounted optics

00:36:05.278 --> 00:36:08.090
<v Jacob Paulsen>or weapon mounted lights? I got nothing.

00:36:09.398 --> 00:36:11.238
<v Jacob Paulsen>I cannot even imagine what you're thinking.

00:36:11.238 --> 00:36:13.648
<v Riley Bowman>I would like to hear more on that for sure. I mean, like you're talking about

00:36:13.648 --> 00:36:15.381
<v Riley Bowman>in the case of optics on a gun,

00:36:16.443 --> 00:36:23.492
<v Riley Bowman>Literally something that helps you aim better with true target focus,

00:36:23.492 --> 00:36:28.132
<v Riley Bowman>which means we're talking about fewer mistake-of-fact shootings.

00:36:29.352 --> 00:36:34.159
<v Riley Bowman>If you don't know what I mean, you're able to focus on your threat,

00:36:34.623 --> 00:36:39.092
<v Riley Bowman>see exactly who they are, what they're doing, what they have in their hands

00:36:39.092 --> 00:36:40.538
<v Riley Bowman>or in their pockets or whatever.

00:36:41.514 --> 00:36:45.672
<v Riley Bowman>Like a device that allows you to aim your gun where you can maintain that level

00:36:45.672 --> 00:36:51.022
<v Riley Bowman>of visual focus and acuity on your target is is an optic on a pistol okay the

00:36:51.022 --> 00:36:52.740
<v Riley Bowman>second thing the lights on a gun,

00:36:53.983 --> 00:36:59.282
<v Riley Bowman>i mean it could be debated how efficacious a weapon mounted light on a civilian

00:36:59.282 --> 00:37:01.419
<v Riley Bowman>pistol is like how because,

00:37:02.452 --> 00:37:06.302
<v Riley Bowman>you might be thinking okay well it allows me to identify my target well i probably

00:37:06.302 --> 00:37:09.392
<v Riley Bowman>should have I already identified before I pointed a gun at them.

00:37:09.392 --> 00:37:11.729
<v Riley Bowman>So I got a handheld light probably involved too.

00:37:12.077 --> 00:37:13.862
<v Riley Bowman>But regardless, it's still a

00:37:13.862 --> 00:37:19.352
<v Riley Bowman>viable tool that has a purpose and in no way makes the gun more dangerous.

00:37:19.352 --> 00:37:20.494
<v Jacob Paulsen>It only makes it safer.

00:37:20.622 --> 00:37:20.871
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:37:21.632 --> 00:37:24.592
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's only conceivable application makes the gun safer.

00:37:24.592 --> 00:37:28.980
<v Riley Bowman>Now the 1911 or single action, you know, trigger thing,

00:37:29.891 --> 00:37:34.312
<v Riley Bowman>this one, I think it actually, here's what i want and i don't know this for

00:37:34.312 --> 00:37:37.672
<v Riley Bowman>a fact but i can see this a little bit where this sheriff for whatever reason

00:37:37.672 --> 00:37:41.032
<v Riley Bowman>because this is coming from the sheriff or the sheriff's office and so most

00:37:41.032 --> 00:37:44.079
<v Riley Bowman>likely has the sheriff's support and it's probably his idea in the first place,

00:37:46.051 --> 00:37:49.211
<v Riley Bowman>I could see a person making the argument that, well, these are single action

00:37:49.211 --> 00:37:52.701
<v Riley Bowman>triggers that are real short, real light, and I'm just concerned that people

00:37:52.701 --> 00:37:54.869
<v Riley Bowman>are going to accidentally pull a trigger where they don't mean to.

00:37:55.153 --> 00:37:59.371
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes, I agree. This is one where it's like, okay, I can get behind your – I can

00:37:59.371 --> 00:38:03.756
<v Jacob Paulsen>understand your ignorance. I can't get behind the decision, but I can understand your ignorance.

00:38:04.511 --> 00:38:09.221
<v Jacob Paulsen>I can't get there with the optics of the lights. I don't understand what ignorance

00:38:09.221 --> 00:38:11.106
<v Jacob Paulsen>leads you to believe this makes sense.

00:38:11.442 --> 00:38:14.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>But yes, the single action triggers, I can understand your ignorance.

00:38:15.175 --> 00:38:21.771
<v Riley Bowman>It's still dumb, but... Anyway, so the news story here, in case I don't know

00:38:21.771 --> 00:38:25.020
<v Riley Bowman>if we actually mentioned it specifically, the Second Amendment Foundation,

00:38:25.771 --> 00:38:28.891
<v Riley Bowman>along with a plaintiff, actually two plaintiffs that they're representing,

00:38:28.891 --> 00:38:35.051
<v Riley Bowman>two Contra Costa County residents with permits, they have filed a lawsuit in the U.S.

00:38:35.051 --> 00:38:39.471
<v Riley Bowman>District Court for the Northern District of California, suing the county for,

00:38:40.500 --> 00:38:41.655
<v Riley Bowman>these terrible policies.

00:38:42.591 --> 00:38:45.219
<v Riley Bowman>That's probably not going to be a very friendly court. them.

00:38:45.643 --> 00:38:48.726
<v Riley Bowman>But that's the way these things start. We've got to file a lawsuit.

00:38:49.852 --> 00:38:54.671
<v Riley Bowman>If that comes back and is not overturned, then they'll take it to the next level, I presume.

00:38:55.054 --> 00:38:57.520
<v Riley Bowman>But that's essentially what's going on. The Second Amendment Foundation,

00:38:57.794 --> 00:39:00.721
<v Riley Bowman>thankfully, has gotten involved and has filed this lawsuit because these are

00:39:00.721 --> 00:39:02.954
<v Riley Bowman>really stupid laws or policies.

00:39:03.656 --> 00:39:05.973
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I just can't. I'm at a loss.

00:39:06.111 --> 00:39:09.799
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, same. Like I said, when I first came across this, I was like, what?

00:39:10.871 --> 00:39:18.459
<v Riley Bowman>I never imagined I'd see that. You know, so wild, wild sauce, man.

00:39:19.743 --> 00:39:21.090
<v Riley Bowman>Let's go to Michigan now.

00:39:21.340 --> 00:39:22.067
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, yeah, Michigan.

00:39:22.067 --> 00:39:26.627
<v Riley Bowman>Another lawsuit being filed. This time, actually, the primary plaintiff is,

00:39:27.727 --> 00:39:30.475
<v Riley Bowman>there are several organizations involved. The NRA is leading the charge here.

00:39:30.702 --> 00:39:31.717
<v Jacob Paulsen>They're the national player.

00:39:31.717 --> 00:39:36.953
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, yeah. You got several Michigan state-level gun rights organizations that are also involved.

00:39:37.394 --> 00:39:41.993
<v Riley Bowman>This is going after Michigan's license to purchase program, if you will.

00:39:42.947 --> 00:39:48.488
<v Riley Bowman>So, this requires anybody without a Michigan concealed permit license to obtain,

00:39:48.946 --> 00:39:51.977
<v Riley Bowman>a permit before buying, possessing, carrying, or transporting any pistol.

00:39:51.977 --> 00:39:55.779
<v Riley Bowman>Now, apparently, this was a law put in place in 1927.

00:39:56.080 --> 00:39:59.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>Another one. This is another one I honestly had no idea about. I was like, what?

00:39:59.767 --> 00:40:02.697
<v Jacob Paulsen>Michigan? Like, you know, I think there's something we're really familiar with.

00:40:02.697 --> 00:40:04.724
<v Jacob Paulsen>We're really familiar with, like, Illinois' FOID card.

00:40:04.981 --> 00:40:07.367
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's just, I don't know, for whatever reason, just seems to come up often

00:40:07.367 --> 00:40:09.142
<v Jacob Paulsen>enough that I have great familiarity.

00:40:09.467 --> 00:40:11.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>And there's some other states that have some permits to purchase things.

00:40:12.108 --> 00:40:16.987
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we've seen new ones come on board recently. And even our own state on August

00:40:16.987 --> 00:40:21.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>1st is imposing a permit to purchase thing for certain firearms,

00:40:21.117 --> 00:40:22.261
<v Jacob Paulsen>not all guns, but some guns.

00:40:23.223 --> 00:40:28.251
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yes, I was unfamiliar with this 1927-era Michigan thing,

00:40:28.251 --> 00:40:29.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>but it is what it sounds like.

00:40:30.591 --> 00:40:36.169
<v Jacob Paulsen>If want by gun, must first get this permit that allows you to be able to go buy the gun.

00:40:37.751 --> 00:40:42.653
<v Jacob Paulsen>The lawsuit basically just says this is – I guess it's challenging two things.

00:40:43.088 --> 00:40:46.792
<v Jacob Paulsen>The first thing is that it's sort of like it's just redundant.

00:40:48.171 --> 00:40:51.941
<v Jacob Paulsen>When I buy a gun, they run a background check anyway. So why do I need to have

00:40:51.941 --> 00:40:55.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>a background check in order to go get a background check? It's just redundant.

00:40:55.726 --> 00:41:01.011
<v Jacob Paulsen>But more relevant, I think, and if you read into kind of what's happened to

00:41:01.331 --> 00:41:04.584
<v Jacob Paulsen>the – I think there's three or four plaintiffs, humans, not organizations,

00:41:04.996 --> 00:41:10.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>but humans that are on this lawsuit, is what I'll call county-level discretion problems.

00:41:11.353 --> 00:41:15.950
<v Jacob Paulsen>So these are the examples I read from these plaintiffs are situations where

00:41:16.252 --> 00:41:19.520
<v Jacob Paulsen>they went in to get the permit to be able to then go and shop and buy a gun,

00:41:19.799 --> 00:41:24.320
<v Jacob Paulsen>and they were denied the permit for various, I would call them discretionary reasons.

00:41:25.531 --> 00:41:28.911
<v Jacob Paulsen>One where it's sort of like they didn't tell me why, they just said no.

00:41:29.358 --> 00:41:34.769
<v Jacob Paulsen>Another one where it's like they think that I'm somebody who's been denied it in other counties.

00:41:35.250 --> 00:41:37.799
<v Jacob Paulsen>They don't have any reason for themselves why I shouldn't get this permit,

00:41:38.176 --> 00:41:41.081
<v Jacob Paulsen>but they are under the impression that other counties have denied me the permit.

00:41:41.081 --> 00:41:42.309
<v Jacob Paulsen>Therefore, they won't give me one.

00:41:43.831 --> 00:41:46.930
<v Jacob Paulsen>Things like that were just like, what's going on here?

00:41:47.691 --> 00:41:52.097
<v Jacob Paulsen>So seemingly ridiculous reasons people are being denied their Second Amendment rights.

00:41:52.445 --> 00:41:57.733
<v Riley Bowman>A couple of the specific examples, some of the plaintiffs named in this lawsuit.

00:41:59.111 --> 00:42:04.815
<v Riley Bowman>One was denied by his county despite passing an FBI Knicks background check.

00:42:05.924 --> 00:42:11.085
<v Riley Bowman>One was turned away before he, apparently he could even apply. That's ridiculous.

00:42:11.590 --> 00:42:15.961
<v Riley Bowman>And another, a third person was denied on, it's just as probable cause.

00:42:16.373 --> 00:42:19.519
<v Riley Bowman>So for whatever reason, the county just decided, you know, they don't,

00:42:19.519 --> 00:42:21.561
<v Riley Bowman>they don't like him. This is how I read that.

00:42:22.897 --> 00:42:28.046
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah, the, the, the, the, the challenge here is that this,

00:42:29.449 --> 00:42:33.357
<v Riley Bowman>and really, and it also talks about how there's no real problem.

00:42:34.402 --> 00:42:37.633
<v Riley Bowman>Means of, you know, pursuing a recourse.

00:42:37.633 --> 00:42:38.563
<v Jacob Paulsen>And there's no way to appeal.

00:42:38.563 --> 00:42:41.603
<v Riley Bowman>Of having an appeal, right? So the county's just like, nope,

00:42:41.603 --> 00:42:46.343
<v Riley Bowman>sorry, we're not going to give you that permit so you can go buy a gun. And you're like, well.

00:42:46.343 --> 00:42:46.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now what?

00:42:46.958 --> 00:42:47.922
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Right? Yep.

00:42:48.154 --> 00:42:51.813
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so. Yeah, well, there was one that he'd applied in his county and he was

00:42:51.813 --> 00:42:54.683
<v Jacob Paulsen>told no. So then he went to apply in a different county and was rejected because

00:42:54.683 --> 00:42:55.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's not the county he lives in.

00:42:56.304 --> 00:42:59.223
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, it's sort of like, what are my options here? Like, how do I get a gun?

00:42:59.223 --> 00:43:03.746
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, this is my constitutional right and there's no legal pathway for me to exercise it.

00:43:04.420 --> 00:43:05.505
<v Riley Bowman>The FBI says I can have one.

00:43:05.766 --> 00:43:08.344
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. What's the issue there?

00:43:08.472 --> 00:43:14.383
<v Riley Bowman>Right? Yeah, it's pretty wild stuff. And like we both said, this was news to

00:43:14.383 --> 00:43:17.636
<v Riley Bowman>both of us that this kind of thing even existed in Michigan.

00:43:18.159 --> 00:43:21.234
<v Riley Bowman>Apparently, if you have a concealed pistol license in Michigan,

00:43:21.624 --> 00:43:26.333
<v Riley Bowman>that means the requirement, that's automatically your permit.

00:43:26.333 --> 00:43:27.453
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you will. You can now buy a gun.

00:43:27.453 --> 00:43:32.703
<v Riley Bowman>Right? And that probably includes a lot of people, people we would know, for instance.

00:43:32.703 --> 00:43:37.953
<v Riley Bowman>And it's like, I know, in fact, I taught a class in Michigan a few years back.

00:43:37.953 --> 00:43:41.523
<v Riley Bowman>And I would imagine every person in that class had a permit.

00:43:41.523 --> 00:43:45.063
<v Riley Bowman>And so in their world, this probably is something that doesn't really come up.

00:43:45.063 --> 00:43:46.833
<v Jacob Paulsen>Becomes a non-issue once you have a permit.

00:43:46.833 --> 00:43:51.670
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. But for those that don't, if your county just, for whatever reason,

00:43:52.463 --> 00:43:54.663
<v Riley Bowman>just tells you, sorry, tough beans.

00:43:54.663 --> 00:43:56.013
<v Jacob Paulsen>Michigan is going to lose this one.

00:43:56.013 --> 00:43:57.981
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, for sure.

00:43:58.550 --> 00:44:06.670
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, I will eat my shirt. There's no way this stands up to constitutional scrutiny. This is insane.

00:44:06.816 --> 00:44:08.389
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah.

00:44:09.346 --> 00:44:12.240
<v Riley Bowman>So we'll have to keep an eye on that one. This one's obviously going to have

00:44:12.240 --> 00:44:14.009
<v Riley Bowman>to go through the court system.

00:44:15.590 --> 00:44:18.772
<v Jacob Paulsen>Hopefully it sets a nice big precedent for other states that are dealing with

00:44:19.650 --> 00:44:21.443
<v Jacob Paulsen>permit to purchase kind of systems. Yeah.

00:44:22.130 --> 00:44:28.351
<v Jacob Paulsen>And very selfishly, here in Colorado, we're about to have a law go into effect

00:44:28.757 --> 00:44:30.870
<v Jacob Paulsen>to create a permit to purchase an AR-15.

00:44:31.479 --> 00:44:35.430
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it'd be really nice if we get some court cases that say AR-15s can't be

00:44:35.430 --> 00:44:40.670
<v Jacob Paulsen>banned and permit to purchase schemes are unconstitutional. So that would be great for me.

00:44:41.050 --> 00:44:45.010
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Final story comes out of Virginia.

00:44:45.510 --> 00:44:50.375
<v Riley Bowman>This is a big deal, of course. Virginians, I know, are well acquainted with what's going on there.

00:44:51.950 --> 00:44:54.870
<v Riley Bowman>And probably many of you as well, even if you don't live in Virginia,

00:44:54.870 --> 00:44:56.310
<v Riley Bowman>because it's gotten a lot of news.

00:44:56.310 --> 00:45:01.180
<v Riley Bowman>But just so you know, guys, that the law there that bans the sale,

00:45:01.180 --> 00:45:04.420
<v Riley Bowman>manufacture, import, purchase, and transfer of, quote-unquote,

00:45:04.420 --> 00:45:10.251
<v Riley Bowman>assault firearms in magazines over 15-round capacity goes into effect in just a few days.

00:45:10.855 --> 00:45:15.393
<v Riley Bowman>Perhaps right around the time that this actually publishes to the podcast feed, this episode.

00:45:16.330 --> 00:45:20.610
<v Riley Bowman>But, you know, we're recording this on June 25th, so you got less than a week.

00:45:21.670 --> 00:45:27.287
<v Riley Bowman>Like six days from today, as of recording of this, this law goes into effect.

00:45:28.710 --> 00:45:33.075
<v Riley Bowman>And so a lot of challenges are going forward on this already.

00:45:34.816 --> 00:45:39.362
<v Riley Bowman>In fact, a friend of ours, John Crump, is involved in one of those out of Lancaster County.

00:45:40.250 --> 00:45:46.682
<v Riley Bowman>Crump v. Katz. Another Katz is, I think, the Attorney General for Virginia.

00:45:46.897 --> 00:45:52.270
<v Riley Bowman>So all of these are plaintiff versus Katz, Santola versus Katz, Curtis v.

00:45:52.270 --> 00:45:56.005
<v Riley Bowman>Katz, McDonnell v. Katz, Black v. Hook. I'm not sure about that one,

00:45:56.515 --> 00:46:01.978
<v Riley Bowman>but all challenging this on various grounds in a lot of different ways now.

00:46:02.756 --> 00:46:06.170
<v Riley Bowman>And there's apparently a three-judge panel at the Supreme Court,

00:46:06.170 --> 00:46:10.340
<v Riley Bowman>the Virginia Supreme Court, that is weighing consolidation.

00:46:10.340 --> 00:46:13.920
<v Riley Bowman>Because there's so many of these cases hitting all at once. And so what the

00:46:13.920 --> 00:46:18.030
<v Riley Bowman>court's like, well, hey, let's consolidate these if we can, because that is

00:46:18.030 --> 00:46:20.599
<v Riley Bowman>just a better and more efficient way of moving forward.

00:46:21.540 --> 00:46:25.820
<v Riley Bowman>But that is still apparently being, you know, that's in the works.

00:46:26.320 --> 00:46:32.157
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think, yeah, what I take from this is there's sort of like a procedural problem

00:46:32.522 --> 00:46:36.900
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's preventing an injunction from being a possibility before the law goes

00:46:36.900 --> 00:46:38.290
<v Jacob Paulsen>into effect. Is that how I read it?

00:46:38.290 --> 00:46:43.500
<v Riley Bowman>That's essentially what I read as well. It's probably one of those things where

00:46:43.500 --> 00:46:48.903
<v Riley Bowman>it's like everybody and their dog got involved in wanting to challenge the law.

00:46:49.652 --> 00:46:53.483
<v Riley Bowman>And so all these cases hit the courts like that.

00:46:54.076 --> 00:46:58.958
<v Riley Bowman>And like great kudos to you guys that are you know that are fighting this fight,

00:46:59.429 --> 00:47:02.783
<v Riley Bowman>but there's so many cases that the courts are like this

00:47:03.224 --> 00:47:07.410
<v Riley Bowman>is too much we need to look at consolidation and so this three judge panel the

00:47:07.410 --> 00:47:10.830
<v Riley Bowman>supreme court it's like we're going to try to consolidate these but that takes

00:47:10.830 --> 00:47:14.630
<v Riley Bowman>time and so unfortunately now we're out of time to try to get an injunction

00:47:14.630 --> 00:47:17.736
<v Riley Bowman>in place before this goes into effect in less than a week yeah.

00:47:18.440 --> 00:47:22.400
<v Jacob Paulsen>There is some good news the silver lining is that this law even in its full

00:47:22.980 --> 00:47:26.496
<v Jacob Paulsen>grand terribleness, does have a grandfather clause.

00:47:26.912 --> 00:47:32.927
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's not like on July 1st your existing rifles and magazines are criminal to possess.

00:47:33.473 --> 00:47:38.860
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's only about new acquisitions. So while it's looking like there's not going

00:47:38.860 --> 00:47:43.300
<v Jacob Paulsen>to be an injunction before this law can go into effect, hopefully an injunction comes soon.

00:47:43.730 --> 00:47:49.280
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in the meantime, no one's being rendered an immediate criminal.

00:47:49.685 --> 00:47:52.937
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just blocking new acquisition and hopefully that's short lived

00:47:55.269 --> 00:47:59.560
<v Riley Bowman>Virginia, of course, is a part of the Fourth Circuit, the federal courts,

00:47:59.746 --> 00:48:04.722
<v Riley Bowman>which is not a particularly two-way friendly circuit.

00:48:05.969 --> 00:48:11.579
<v Riley Bowman>So, you know, chances are I see this potentially, you know, getting overturned

00:48:11.579 --> 00:48:15.979
<v Riley Bowman>or being a part of future efforts that the Supreme Court's already,

00:48:15.979 --> 00:48:20.515
<v Riley Bowman>you know, undertaking to potentially overturn laws like this one.

00:48:21.609 --> 00:48:26.229
<v Riley Bowman>But it's not going to happen in time for, I think, I mean, before this law goes into effect.

00:48:26.229 --> 00:48:31.799
<v Riley Bowman>And so I'm sorry, Virginians, you are in a tough spot there.

00:48:31.799 --> 00:48:34.839
<v Riley Bowman>We feel your pain. You know, we're dealing with some similar things.

00:48:34.839 --> 00:48:40.682
<v Riley Bowman>And we've had a 15-round magazine capacity limit in Colorado ourselves for over a decade now.

00:48:42.749 --> 00:48:47.543
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah, there you go. That's the latest update on what's going on out of Virginia. Yeah.

00:48:48.931 --> 00:48:55.309
<v Riley Bowman>So, lots of, basically, you know, I think the summary of everything we're basically

00:48:55.309 --> 00:49:00.449
<v Riley Bowman>talking about here today is just how important it is that we have the makeup

00:49:00.449 --> 00:49:02.125
<v Riley Bowman>of the Supreme Court that we currently do.

00:49:02.450 --> 00:49:05.969
<v Riley Bowman>It's probably the most favorable Supreme Court in the history of Supreme Courts

00:49:06.389 --> 00:49:09.055
<v Riley Bowman>that I can think of as far as the Second Amendment is concerned.

00:49:09.311 --> 00:49:09.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>By far.

00:49:09.914 --> 00:49:15.229
<v Riley Bowman>And, and they've got a lot, a lot of work to do and very important work and

00:49:15.229 --> 00:49:21.553
<v Riley Bowman>hopefully comes down on the side of the Second Amendment as we see it for the rights of everybody.

00:49:23.126 --> 00:49:29.965
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, the last decade has been really important to new Supreme Court justices.

00:49:30.632 --> 00:49:36.153
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the influence that they're having now in the last five or so years,

00:49:36.753 --> 00:49:41.296
<v Jacob Paulsen>starting with Bruin and now some of these other things happening, is critical as well.

00:49:41.888 --> 00:49:45.983
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's not all sunshine and puppies and roses. There's been a couple of little

00:49:45.983 --> 00:49:50.067
<v Jacob Paulsen>setbacks from my perspective as a pro-gun rights person.

00:49:50.845 --> 00:49:54.173
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I think all around we're getting the big stuff right at the U.S.

00:49:54.173 --> 00:49:59.113
<v Jacob Paulsen>Supreme Court as it relates to guns and now it's just it's a waiting game and

00:49:59.113 --> 00:50:02.717
<v Jacob Paulsen>you've heard us say this over and over again on this podcast over and over again

00:50:03.581 --> 00:50:08.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>that the the game has moved like the battle is no longer being fought in the

00:50:08.423 --> 00:50:13.033
<v Jacob Paulsen>legislature like remember our legislative updates like you go back 10 years

00:50:13.033 --> 00:50:15.553
<v Jacob Paulsen>ago in our podcast our legislative updates were about all the laws that were

00:50:15.553 --> 00:50:18.319
<v Jacob Paulsen>being proposed and passed and going into effect.

00:50:18.893 --> 00:50:21.553
<v Jacob Paulsen>And now the majority of our legislative updates are about lawsuits that are

00:50:21.553 --> 00:50:23.433
<v Jacob Paulsen>being filed and decided in courts.

00:50:24.327 --> 00:50:29.012
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's where the battle game is now. And so stay tuned.

00:50:29.308 --> 00:50:32.133
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think it's important to support these organizations who,

00:50:32.133 --> 00:50:36.959
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, it takes money for these organizations to file these lawsuits and follow them through.

00:50:37.464 --> 00:50:41.313
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you're looking to support, you know, the Second Amendment Foundation was

00:50:41.313 --> 00:50:43.495
<v Jacob Paulsen>mentioned today. The NRA was mentioned today.

00:50:43.925 --> 00:50:48.139
<v Jacob Paulsen>The Firearms Policy Coalition is doing really good things. Gun Owners of America

00:50:48.575 --> 00:50:49.513
<v Jacob Paulsen>is doing really good things.

00:50:49.953 --> 00:50:55.576
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those are four organizations that are filing lawsuits and following them through in the courts.

00:50:56.075 --> 00:51:01.793
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so anyway, a little endorsement for under your own conscience,

00:51:02.413 --> 00:51:05.743
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, and your own money. Like if you wanted to support an organization,

00:51:05.743 --> 00:51:07.324
<v Jacob Paulsen>those four are good candidates. Yep.

00:51:08.536 --> 00:51:10.533
<v Riley Bowman>I think that's well summarized and well said. So,

00:51:12.541 --> 00:51:14.630
<v Riley Bowman>those are kind of the big things we're keeping an eye on right now.

00:51:14.630 --> 00:51:18.300
<v Riley Bowman>And we'll, of course, continue to keep an eye on things moving forward and keep you updated.

00:51:18.840 --> 00:51:22.530
<v Riley Bowman>We'll try to do a legislative updates episode about once a month,

00:51:22.530 --> 00:51:27.880
<v Riley Bowman>as we have typically done in the past. And keep an eye on concealedcarry.com.

00:51:28.180 --> 00:51:30.970
<v Riley Bowman>I've been publishing regularly. Jacob's been doing a great job with this,

00:51:30.970 --> 00:51:37.062
<v Riley Bowman>publishing regularly some updates in this regard in the form of blog posts on concealedcarry.com.

00:51:37.800 --> 00:51:40.039
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's not a good place to keep an eye on things.

00:51:41.427 --> 00:51:46.651
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. With that though, it's almost our nation's birthday and I'm super excited. I'm excited.

00:51:47.380 --> 00:51:49.710
<v Riley Bowman>This is a big deal. I'm actually kind of sad in a way, you know,

00:51:49.710 --> 00:51:54.597
<v Riley Bowman>my son's out of country right now on a church mission and he's missing it.

00:51:54.597 --> 00:51:59.020
<v Riley Bowman>He's missing this historical 250th, you know, birthday.

00:51:59.020 --> 00:52:01.179
<v Jacob Paulsen>That is sad. That is sad.

00:52:01.347 --> 00:52:02.300
<v Riley Bowman>But he's having a good time, by the way.

00:52:02.300 --> 00:52:04.650
<v Jacob Paulsen>Though he is in Brazil during World Cup.

00:52:05.051 --> 00:52:05.540
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:52:05.910 --> 00:52:07.924
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's pretty epic too. That is pretty epic.

00:52:08.720 --> 00:52:12.480
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. And he's, he's getting the full Brazilian, you know,

00:52:13.561 --> 00:52:15.950
<v Riley Bowman>world cup experience for sure. Too bad.

00:52:15.950 --> 00:52:17.178
<v Jacob Paulsen>They're not doing better.

00:52:17.282 --> 00:52:19.151
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. I think he's already purchased,

00:52:21.077 --> 00:52:25.817
<v Riley Bowman>that i know of at least four different like jerseys yeah yeah tropically more.

00:52:26.757 --> 00:52:29.857
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah they're gonna they'll they'll paint the streets green i mean it's no joke

00:52:29.857 --> 00:52:31.927
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's that's that's more than religion

00:52:31.927 --> 00:52:36.167
<v Riley Bowman>There when brazil assuming they yeah as you mentioned they're not probably doing

00:52:36.167 --> 00:52:41.850
<v Riley Bowman>as well as not their best years as they would like uh things may get a little crazy too down there.

00:52:42.156 --> 00:52:42.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>Better for him to stay

00:52:42.917 --> 00:52:47.700
<v Riley Bowman>Inside i'm actually thankful he's in a smaller uh town right now as opposed to like,

00:52:48.159 --> 00:52:50.457
<v Riley Bowman>you know one of the bigger cities he's definitely you know he's not he's not

00:52:50.457 --> 00:52:55.077
<v Riley Bowman>in rio de janeiro but he's not very far from rio but he won't be any you know

00:52:55.077 --> 00:52:58.697
<v Riley Bowman>he won't be in rio or anything when you know when things kick off

00:52:59.117 --> 00:53:02.667
<v Riley Bowman>yeah yeah i should say win or lose because if they win things go crazy if they

00:53:02.667 --> 00:53:04.387
<v Riley Bowman>lose things will be crazy right yeah.

00:53:04.387 --> 00:53:08.475
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's uh serious yeah serious it's more than religion

00:53:08.771 --> 00:53:14.037
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah but anyway happy birthday america we anticipate doing one more episode

00:53:14.037 --> 00:53:16.979
<v Riley Bowman>before the official birthday of our nation.

00:53:17.917 --> 00:53:23.637
<v Riley Bowman>And I actually hope to record that next week and publish next week on Friday,

00:53:23.977 --> 00:53:28.287
<v Riley Bowman>the 3rd of July. I think it would be good to drop that just in time for the 4th.

00:53:29.402 --> 00:53:33.277
<v Riley Bowman>But still, we'll wish you guys all well and wish America a happy birthday.

00:53:33.597 --> 00:53:37.001
<v Riley Bowman>We'll get another opportunity next week. And until next time,

00:53:37.924 --> 00:53:40.118
<v Riley Bowman>a reminder to train right, train often, and train safe.

00:53:40.890 --> 00:53:44.585
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you can fight hard, fight fast, and fight true. Take care.

00:53:59.010 --> 00:54:01.116
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder that laws vary from place to place, and we encourage listeners to

00:54:01.116 --> 00:54:03.085
<v Riley Bowman>seek local legal advice to understand applicable laws.

00:54:03.346 --> 00:54:05.646
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, Inc., its brands and properties, and the Concealed Carry podcast

00:54:05.646 --> 00:54:07.339
<v Riley Bowman>is not a legal service, nor are we attorneys at law.

00:54:07.525 --> 00:54:09.746
<v Riley Bowman>We make our best faith effort to share Concealed Carry-related insights and

00:54:09.746 --> 00:54:12.046
<v Riley Bowman>information about firearm-related incidents and the laws pertaining,

00:54:12.046 --> 00:54:13.480
<v Riley Bowman>based on our own understanding and experience.

00:54:13.777 --> 00:54:15.886
<v Riley Bowman>But things can be different where you live, or laws may have changed by the

00:54:15.886 --> 00:54:18.376
<v Riley Bowman>time you listen to this. We cannot be held liable for your actions based on

00:54:18.376 --> 00:54:19.570
<v Riley Bowman>the information shared in this podcast.

00:54:19.843 --> 00:54:21.846
<v Riley Bowman>Please exercise care with all things pertaining to firearm use,

00:54:21.846 --> 00:54:24.464
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, and always practice following basic firearm safety rules.

00:54:24.754 --> 00:54:29.056
<v Riley Bowman>More information about safety can be found at concealedcarry.com forward slash safety. Thank you.

