WEBVTT

00:00:15.603 --> 00:00:16.663
<v Riley Bowman>And welcome to the Concealed Carry

00:00:16.663 --> 00:00:20.823
<v Riley Bowman>Podcast, part of the ConcealedCarry.com network, brought to you by HK.

00:00:22.043 --> 00:00:27.423
<v Riley Bowman>Today is Friday, May 29th, 2026, as of the recording of this live episode,

00:00:27.423 --> 00:00:32.463
<v Riley Bowman>and I am your host, Riley Bowman, joined today by co-host and president of Concealed

00:00:32.463 --> 00:00:34.383
<v Riley Bowman>Carry, Inc., Jacob Paulson.

00:00:35.263 --> 00:00:36.043
<v Jacob Paulsen>Howdy, howdy.

00:00:37.063 --> 00:00:39.523
<v Riley Bowman>With a classic Wyoming howdy.

00:00:41.843 --> 00:00:48.683
<v Riley Bowman>Glad to be with you all. We've got a packed episode for you today going over

00:00:48.683 --> 00:00:53.883
<v Riley Bowman>a number of legislative updates from the federal level and also from around

00:00:53.883 --> 00:00:57.383
<v Riley Bowman>the country and a number of states that have things to report on.

00:00:57.603 --> 00:01:03.223
<v Riley Bowman>The truth is there's lots of things we could report on and cannot get to at

00:01:03.223 --> 00:01:05.823
<v Riley Bowman>all because of how much there typically is.

00:01:05.823 --> 00:01:10.823
<v Riley Bowman>So we try to hit the big things, the biggest bang for your buck,

00:01:10.963 --> 00:01:15.103
<v Riley Bowman>so to speak, or sometimes the biggest damage for your literal buck,

00:01:15.263 --> 00:01:20.783
<v Riley Bowman>your tax dollars going to work, passing all manner of legislation.

00:01:22.417 --> 00:01:25.197
<v Riley Bowman>Well, in some cases, it's good, but we don't have as much good news,

00:01:25.277 --> 00:01:27.617
<v Riley Bowman>unfortunately, today as probably some bad news.

00:01:27.797 --> 00:01:32.777
<v Riley Bowman>The big news is that apparently it is time for the Glock Wars, Jacob.

00:01:34.997 --> 00:01:41.017
<v Riley Bowman>So the new tactic seems to be that states are specifically going after Glocks.

00:01:41.897 --> 00:01:46.197
<v Riley Bowman>Probably no surprise there, but it is kind of an interesting tactic and an interesting

00:01:46.197 --> 00:01:50.937
<v Riley Bowman>approach, including some of the verbiage that is used to identify said firearm.

00:01:51.797 --> 00:01:58.097
<v Riley Bowman>So we'll break that down for you here in a bit. We also got some great stories for you all.

00:01:58.457 --> 00:02:04.877
<v Riley Bowman>We'll be talking about some news right here in Colorado, which is impacting

00:02:04.877 --> 00:02:10.617
<v Riley Bowman>us here, Jacob and myself, and our business location here in Colorado.

00:02:11.257 --> 00:02:15.357
<v Riley Bowman>There's some interesting developments there. and some things on the federal

00:02:15.357 --> 00:02:22.437
<v Riley Bowman>level, as I mentioned before as well, including another lawsuit about carrying

00:02:22.437 --> 00:02:25.617
<v Riley Bowman>a firearm on post office grounds.

00:02:26.697 --> 00:02:30.457
<v Riley Bowman>So it'll be interesting to see how that all develops. We'll get into it all

00:02:30.457 --> 00:02:36.077
<v Riley Bowman>here shortly, but first our episode is sponsored today specifically by the EDC

00:02:36.077 --> 00:02:37.857
<v Riley Bowman>Belt Company Foundation Belt.

00:02:39.257 --> 00:02:43.217
<v Riley Bowman>You want to have the best quality gear to carry your gun,

00:02:43.317 --> 00:02:48.717
<v Riley Bowman>your equipment your holster we trust and rely upon the edc belt company foundation

00:02:48.717 --> 00:02:52.977
<v Riley Bowman>belt which we sell at concealed carry.com but you can also go straight over

00:02:52.977 --> 00:02:56.757
<v Riley Bowman>to edc belt co edc belt co.com,

00:02:57.557 --> 00:03:04.217
<v Riley Bowman>and pick up a edc belt company belt today uh yeah i actually just needed to

00:03:04.217 --> 00:03:10.777
<v Riley Bowman>pick up a a new one just yesterday, in fact, because the other one is too big.

00:03:11.137 --> 00:03:16.417
<v Riley Bowman>I can make it work, but I'm glad to move down a size. So anyway.

00:03:17.692 --> 00:03:21.132
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah jacob that's probably what you got on your waistband right now i take it.

00:03:21.132 --> 00:03:27.952
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah in fact i have a beta color on my of the of the belt so maybe or maybe

00:03:27.952 --> 00:03:33.132
<v Jacob Paulsen>not we'll be seeing new colors of edc foundation belts in the future

00:03:33.132 --> 00:03:38.692
<v Riley Bowman>That's very exciting yeah is this a new development i mean i know you and i

00:03:38.692 --> 00:03:42.832
<v Riley Bowman>talked about different colors but like i I have not seen this,

00:03:43.052 --> 00:03:44.572
<v Riley Bowman>so did you just get it or what?

00:03:44.892 --> 00:03:50.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>I've had an album for actually over a year. Oh. So I really like it. The color's awesome.

00:03:51.012 --> 00:03:53.512
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just a question of capital to make a bunch of them.

00:03:53.852 --> 00:04:01.112
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm neither confirming nor saying it's not happening, just that we're looking at that.

00:04:01.732 --> 00:04:05.152
<v Riley Bowman>I feel really dumb now because I truly don't remember you having a different

00:04:05.152 --> 00:04:07.612
<v Riley Bowman>color on your waistband. I feel like you've always had black.

00:04:07.932 --> 00:04:10.632
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, I'm glad that you're not pulling up my shirt and looking at my belt.

00:04:12.272 --> 00:04:14.132
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, but the next time I see you, I'm pulling your shirt up.

00:04:18.872 --> 00:04:23.012
<v Riley Bowman>Okay, EDCbeltco.com, guys. Go pick up yourself a foundation belt.

00:04:23.132 --> 00:04:28.492
<v Riley Bowman>It is called the foundation for a reason because you need a solid foundation to carry your gun with.

00:04:28.652 --> 00:04:31.312
<v Riley Bowman>That is what the EDC Belt Company Foundation Belt does.

00:04:31.532 --> 00:04:36.552
<v Riley Bowman>And it does so more comfortably and more concealably than any other option out

00:04:36.552 --> 00:04:40.432
<v Riley Bowman>there. I have tested and I've tested a bunch, including another very popular

00:04:40.432 --> 00:04:45.772
<v Riley Bowman>one that works very well in some regards, but not so well in all of those areas I just mentioned.

00:04:46.492 --> 00:04:50.392
<v Riley Bowman>Concealability and comfort. And the foundation belt wins, I think,

00:04:50.432 --> 00:04:52.052
<v Riley Bowman>in both those categories.

00:04:53.272 --> 00:04:58.952
<v Riley Bowman>Let's get into our first story, Jacob. Actually, you authored this one on concealedcarry.com website.

00:05:00.300 --> 00:05:05.540
<v Riley Bowman>And this is an update on the Colorado State or Senate Bill 3,

00:05:05.540 --> 00:05:08.680
<v Riley Bowman>which is quite interesting.

00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:11.460
<v Riley Bowman>It's actually passed last year, right?

00:05:12.080 --> 00:05:12.360
<v Jacob Paulsen>Correct.

00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:21.160
<v Riley Bowman>It's taken all this time until just like a couple weeks ago to get somewhere with it, it seems.

00:05:21.660 --> 00:05:27.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, I mean, in their defense, the law doesn't go into effect until August 1st, 22nd, 26th.

00:05:27.500 --> 00:05:31.960
<v Jacob Paulsen>So there's only so much rush to figure out what the law means and how it's going

00:05:31.960 --> 00:05:38.820
<v Jacob Paulsen>to be applied when it's signed into law basically like a year and four months

00:05:38.820 --> 00:05:40.220
<v Jacob Paulsen>before it has to go into effect.

00:05:40.480 --> 00:05:44.980
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. It's one of those things, though, where for a long time we've been

00:05:44.980 --> 00:05:49.320
<v Riley Bowman>sitting here wondering, okay, what firearms is it going to affect? Right.

00:05:49.440 --> 00:05:53.900
<v Riley Bowman>So in case you're not familiar, what we're talking about here is the bill,

00:05:54.140 --> 00:06:02.060
<v Riley Bowman>like I said, passed last year, that is it creates a a semi-automatic firearm

00:06:02.060 --> 00:06:05.540
<v Riley Bowman>category that is going to require

00:06:05.540 --> 00:06:11.760
<v Riley Bowman>Colorado residents to then go through training to obtain a license,

00:06:12.140 --> 00:06:14.720
<v Riley Bowman>I guess, or permit or whatever.

00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:19.860
<v Riley Bowman>I don't remember the verbiage that's used to then be able to go and purchase a,

00:06:20.816 --> 00:06:23.756
<v Riley Bowman>those semi-automatic firearms that are on this list or

00:06:23.756 --> 00:06:26.456
<v Riley Bowman>in this category and for the longest time we

00:06:26.456 --> 00:06:32.436
<v Riley Bowman>didn't even know officially what would be in that category i guess we still

00:06:32.436 --> 00:06:35.616
<v Riley Bowman>don't even know officially because what was just released a couple weeks ago

00:06:35.616 --> 00:06:41.056
<v Riley Bowman>is the draft list but it becomes quite apparent once you see it i mean we suspected

00:06:41.056 --> 00:06:44.996
<v Riley Bowman>this but there was still this like okay are.

00:06:46.316 --> 00:06:49.556
<v Riley Bowman>Pistols for instance or certain pistols and i'm not just talking about like

00:06:49.556 --> 00:06:53.696
<v Riley Bowman>ar pistols but like handguns included in this, because the way the law was written

00:06:53.696 --> 00:06:56.656
<v Riley Bowman>and passed left some ambiguity.

00:06:57.376 --> 00:07:06.176
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, it does seem to be more geared towards AR-15 variant firearms, AK-47 and the like.

00:07:06.676 --> 00:07:10.656
<v Riley Bowman>So again, you authored the article, the update on our website,

00:07:10.756 --> 00:07:12.256
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob. What's the skinny on this?

00:07:13.291 --> 00:07:16.751
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, for those who are not in Colorado, I think the high-level understanding

00:07:16.751 --> 00:07:21.871
<v Jacob Paulsen>that you need to understand and take away from this is that the term that those

00:07:21.871 --> 00:07:26.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>of us in the community are using to describe this type of legislation is permit to purchase.

00:07:27.051 --> 00:07:32.291
<v Jacob Paulsen>So instead of an outright ban on a certain type of gun or category of gun or

00:07:32.291 --> 00:07:37.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>firearms, what this is is an attempt to say, hey, no, we're not banning anything.

00:07:37.931 --> 00:07:41.371
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can still buy this stuff, and you can still own it if you already got it.

00:07:41.371 --> 00:07:46.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>But in order to buy these particular guns, whatever falls into the list,

00:07:47.131 --> 00:07:49.251
<v Jacob Paulsen>you have to get a permit to do that.

00:07:49.311 --> 00:07:52.991
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that permit's going to have some hoops to jump through, including background

00:07:52.991 --> 00:07:56.571
<v Jacob Paulsen>checks and taking a training class and all that kind of stuff.

00:07:56.731 --> 00:08:01.071
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the high level, like what this really is. And Colorado is not the

00:08:01.071 --> 00:08:04.391
<v Jacob Paulsen>first state to do a permit to purchase type program.

00:08:04.611 --> 00:08:08.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think it's probably the most robust we've seen so far. But,

00:08:08.671 --> 00:08:14.071
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, Illinois has a FOID card, which is similar in theory,

00:08:14.331 --> 00:08:16.251
<v Jacob Paulsen>though demonstrably different as well.

00:08:16.411 --> 00:08:20.391
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think that we'll see more states do this. I think that this is going to

00:08:20.391 --> 00:08:26.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>be a common anti-gun template for the country because

00:08:27.551 --> 00:08:32.391
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's much harder to challenge its constitutionality because it's not banning.

00:08:33.366 --> 00:08:37.206
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's really easy to challenge, and I think that in the next probably nine months

00:08:37.206 --> 00:08:38.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>or so, we're going to see the U.S.

00:08:38.786 --> 00:08:42.106
<v Jacob Paulsen>Supreme Court rule on AR-15s and that

00:08:42.106 --> 00:08:45.246
<v Jacob Paulsen>they can't be banned, that they're constitutionally protected firearms.

00:08:45.386 --> 00:08:47.666
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that's inevitable at this point.

00:08:47.866 --> 00:08:52.306
<v Jacob Paulsen>But coming back to this, this is not a ban. So if you're going to challenge

00:08:52.306 --> 00:08:57.206
<v Jacob Paulsen>the constitutionality of this, you're basically saying that the burden is too

00:08:57.206 --> 00:08:59.946
<v Jacob Paulsen>high, that it's too difficult for,

00:09:00.286 --> 00:09:05.506
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, it's unreasonably difficult to go through the process to be able to

00:09:05.506 --> 00:09:09.706
<v Jacob Paulsen>obtain the gun, the constitutionally protected firearm.

00:09:09.946 --> 00:09:13.446
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that argument is something we made here in Colorado. What we've learned

00:09:13.446 --> 00:09:15.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>is that this is what this is going to look like.

00:09:15.626 --> 00:09:18.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>First, you'll have to go to a website and set up a user account.

00:09:18.606 --> 00:09:22.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>And when you set up that user account, it will attempt to identify if you've

00:09:22.126 --> 00:09:24.306
<v Jacob Paulsen>ever taken a hunter safety course before.

00:09:24.686 --> 00:09:27.446
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you've taken a hunter safety course in Colorado, in theory,

00:09:27.546 --> 00:09:28.746
<v Jacob Paulsen>then it would be able to identify that.

00:09:28.926 --> 00:09:32.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you've taken a hunter safety class in a different state, it may not know that.

00:09:32.606 --> 00:09:38.466
<v Jacob Paulsen>You might have to then walk down to Colorado Parks and Wildlife offices and

00:09:38.466 --> 00:09:41.466
<v Jacob Paulsen>say, hey, see here, I took hunter safety when I lived in Alabama.

00:09:41.706 --> 00:09:45.266
<v Jacob Paulsen>Please add that to the system. Then they would add that to the system in theory.

00:09:45.266 --> 00:09:48.786
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then you'd go back to your computer at home, log in to the user account

00:09:48.786 --> 00:09:52.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>again, verify that that's there or not.

00:09:52.486 --> 00:09:55.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>Regardless, if you do or don't have Hunter Safety, you would then print off

00:09:55.166 --> 00:09:57.806
<v Jacob Paulsen>a thing that you would take to the sheriff's office and you'd say,

00:09:57.866 --> 00:10:00.886
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, I set up the user account in the place. See, see?

00:10:01.306 --> 00:10:05.006
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the sheriff's office would then take the…

00:10:05.612 --> 00:10:10.272
<v Jacob Paulsen>The next step. Now, the next step, though, is a little bit complicated because

00:10:10.272 --> 00:10:14.232
<v Jacob Paulsen>what we're learning is that when you get to that sheriff's office,

00:10:14.332 --> 00:10:16.992
<v Jacob Paulsen>in addition to having the piece of paper that says you set up the user account

00:10:16.992 --> 00:10:19.492
<v Jacob Paulsen>on this new website that currently doesn't exist today,

00:10:20.352 --> 00:10:22.832
<v Jacob Paulsen>You'll also have to present a background check.

00:10:22.952 --> 00:10:25.912
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's really unclear where you're going to get this background check.

00:10:26.072 --> 00:10:29.052
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, you're walking into a building that traditionally does background checks.

00:10:29.212 --> 00:10:31.592
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you would think that the sheriff's office could perform that.

00:10:31.692 --> 00:10:34.852
<v Jacob Paulsen>And maybe they end up In the end, they will end up doing that starting on August

00:10:34.852 --> 00:10:36.192
<v Jacob Paulsen>1st. But today it's unclear.

00:10:36.612 --> 00:10:39.032
<v Jacob Paulsen>Today what we know is that you're supposed to show up at the sheriff's office

00:10:39.432 --> 00:10:42.512
<v Jacob Paulsen>with the paper that says you set up the user account on the website and with

00:10:42.512 --> 00:10:44.752
<v Jacob Paulsen>a background check that's been performed by somebody somewhere.

00:10:44.812 --> 00:10:46.112
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't know what that would look like.

00:10:47.252 --> 00:10:50.152
<v Jacob Paulsen>Probably not the kind of thing that you would pull on an employee to see if

00:10:50.152 --> 00:10:51.452
<v Jacob Paulsen>they've been convicted of a felony, though.

00:10:51.972 --> 00:10:55.232
<v Jacob Paulsen>It'd have to be a criminal background check. So anyway, that's confusing.

00:10:55.372 --> 00:10:58.372
<v Jacob Paulsen>But somehow you get to the sheriff's office, the background check is performed

00:10:58.372 --> 00:11:01.312
<v Jacob Paulsen>by somebody, and you've set up this user account on this website.

00:11:01.312 --> 00:11:06.532
<v Jacob Paulsen>The sheriff then reviews that, verifies that, yeah, all this checks out,

00:11:06.672 --> 00:11:11.212
<v Jacob Paulsen>like we're good here, like nobody's screwed up, nobody's done anything wrong.

00:11:12.612 --> 00:11:16.172
<v Jacob Paulsen>They either are conducting the background check or they're verifying the background

00:11:16.172 --> 00:11:18.572
<v Jacob Paulsen>check that you're producing, I guess, one of those two things.

00:11:18.572 --> 00:11:28.812
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then they provide you with a class eligibility thing, card thing.

00:11:28.812 --> 00:11:32.592
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't know if it's physical or if it just goes into the same website database thingy.

00:11:33.012 --> 00:11:34.832
<v Jacob Paulsen>Colorado Parks and Wildlife is very excited about the database.

00:11:35.292 --> 00:11:40.312
<v Jacob Paulsen>So they verify that you did all the things, you passed the background check,

00:11:40.432 --> 00:11:44.392
<v Jacob Paulsen>and they say, yeah, you are now officially hereby eligible to go take a class.

00:11:44.392 --> 00:11:48.312
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if you do have, in fact, some sort of...

00:11:50.945 --> 00:11:56.145
<v Jacob Paulsen>Hunter safety on your record, then that's good news for you.

00:11:56.385 --> 00:12:00.625
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can just take the basic course, which is going to be at least four hours.

00:12:01.105 --> 00:12:04.885
<v Jacob Paulsen>However, if you've never taken hunter safety before, then you have to take the

00:12:04.885 --> 00:12:08.925
<v Jacob Paulsen>extended course, which is 12 hours long.

00:12:09.345 --> 00:12:13.685
<v Jacob Paulsen>Once you've taken that course, then your instructor who taught you the course,

00:12:13.805 --> 00:12:17.025
<v Jacob Paulsen>which is some private person like me or Riley, then they enter

00:12:17.025 --> 00:12:20.625
<v Jacob Paulsen>that into the database yep this person passed the course they

00:12:20.625 --> 00:12:23.265
<v Jacob Paulsen>have to do that within some number of days i think they have

00:12:23.265 --> 00:12:27.405
<v Jacob Paulsen>like seven days to do that but until they do that you can't go buy a gun once

00:12:27.405 --> 00:12:31.265
<v Jacob Paulsen>the instructor enters this stuff manually into this database confirming that

00:12:31.265 --> 00:12:35.745
<v Jacob Paulsen>the student completed the class then you can go to a gun store and the local

00:12:35.745 --> 00:12:39.705
<v Jacob Paulsen>gun store the ffl they have to have access to that database they have to log

00:12:39.705 --> 00:12:42.145
<v Jacob Paulsen>in and say oh yes jacob paulson this guy.

00:12:42.265 --> 00:12:45.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, he passed the class. We can sell him one of these guns.

00:12:45.865 --> 00:12:48.665
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the kind of burden we're talking about.

00:12:48.965 --> 00:12:52.405
<v Jacob Paulsen>And for me, it's absolutely unconstitutional.

00:12:52.625 --> 00:12:55.685
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's utterly ridiculous and stupid. Of course, I think background checks are

00:12:55.685 --> 00:13:00.725
<v Jacob Paulsen>already arguably unconstitutional, but this is 10 steps past that.

00:13:01.565 --> 00:13:06.705
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the kind of thing that's going on here. And that's what it looks like.

00:13:06.845 --> 00:13:09.945
<v Riley Bowman>Why is this relevant? Why are we talking about it to a national audience?

00:13:10.225 --> 00:13:16.325
<v Riley Bowman>Well, because I think it's important for you to hear what states like Colorado,

00:13:16.665 --> 00:13:19.845
<v Riley Bowman>California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Virginia,

00:13:20.405 --> 00:13:24.765
<v Riley Bowman>Connecticut, and so on and so forth, what they're up to, because this is the

00:13:24.765 --> 00:13:26.805
<v Riley Bowman>stuff that's coming down the pike.

00:13:27.605 --> 00:13:30.885
<v Riley Bowman>One day you may very well find this in your backyard.

00:13:31.085 --> 00:13:35.125
<v Riley Bowman>I know you may be in, you know, name your red state and think,

00:13:35.225 --> 00:13:37.825
<v Riley Bowman>well, we're red state. this will never happen here. Guess what?

00:13:38.065 --> 00:13:43.725
<v Riley Bowman>I wouldn't have guessed when I moved to Colorado in 2009 that this sort of thing would happen here.

00:13:45.231 --> 00:13:49.471
<v Riley Bowman>So things change quickly. Politics, unfortunately, can change quickly.

00:13:49.891 --> 00:13:55.451
<v Riley Bowman>You get the wrong people in power, the wrong organizations,

00:13:55.951 --> 00:14:00.791
<v Riley Bowman>the wrong political organizations making big mistakes like what's happened here

00:14:00.791 --> 00:14:05.131
<v Riley Bowman>in Colorado historically in the last decade and a half or so.

00:14:05.331 --> 00:14:13.591
<v Riley Bowman>And before you know it, I'm not trying to pick sides here as far as political parties go.

00:14:14.211 --> 00:14:18.611
<v Riley Bowman>But before you know it, the party that's friendly to the Second Amendment is

00:14:18.611 --> 00:14:21.151
<v Riley Bowman>no longer anywhere close to being in power.

00:14:21.331 --> 00:14:28.731
<v Riley Bowman>And you end up with stuff like this. The complicated mess that this system is, is the punishment.

00:14:29.251 --> 00:14:34.731
<v Riley Bowman>And that's what is unfortunately problematic for us, you know,

00:14:34.731 --> 00:14:36.051
<v Riley Bowman>that are going to have to deal with this.

00:14:36.051 --> 00:14:41.251
<v Riley Bowman>And to your point, Jacob, you're like, oh, you know, you don't have high hopes

00:14:41.251 --> 00:14:47.711
<v Riley Bowman>for the Supreme Court making some landmark ruling in the relatively near future,

00:14:47.931 --> 00:14:55.711
<v Riley Bowman>meaning the next couple of years, that clarifies and overturns permit purchase schemes like this.

00:14:58.031 --> 00:15:06.651
<v Riley Bowman>And that's unfortunate because we have rights, and I know that the argument

00:15:06.651 --> 00:15:10.111
<v Riley Bowman>can be made by the other side, well, you have a means to obtain,

00:15:11.140 --> 00:15:18.600
<v Riley Bowman>And practice said right, but it's so onerous and complicated and messy that

00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:23.260
<v Riley Bowman>it strips effectively away the right from people that aren't going to go through

00:15:23.260 --> 00:15:27.260
<v Riley Bowman>the process or do not have the money to go through that process.

00:15:27.480 --> 00:15:31.300
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, we should probably move on.

00:15:31.760 --> 00:15:35.000
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, you know, I'll just quickly add that we see similar things relative to

00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:36.600
<v Jacob Paulsen>getting a concealed handgun permit, right?

00:15:36.600 --> 00:15:40.960
<v Jacob Paulsen>Post Bruins, you have several states who are like, oh, I guess we have to create

00:15:40.960 --> 00:15:44.360
<v Jacob Paulsen>illegal means via which someone can obtain a concealed carry permit,

00:15:44.460 --> 00:15:47.600
<v Jacob Paulsen>but they can still make that means highly complex.

00:15:47.800 --> 00:15:49.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we've seen lawsuits on that.

00:15:49.980 --> 00:15:55.140
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've seen successful lawsuits against states who have made it too onerous to

00:15:55.140 --> 00:15:56.340
<v Jacob Paulsen>obtain a concealed carry permit.

00:15:56.600 --> 00:16:02.300
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I do think long term, that's viable for these kinds of permit to purchase schemes.

00:16:03.180 --> 00:16:06.580
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I think in the short term we're not going to see that victory

00:16:07.629 --> 00:16:11.229
<v Riley Bowman>We have a story later in today's episode out of Maryland, actually,

00:16:11.389 --> 00:16:16.929
<v Riley Bowman>of a lawsuit against, because the next step for a lot of these states is,

00:16:17.009 --> 00:16:18.349
<v Riley Bowman>okay, we'll have a process in place.

00:16:18.349 --> 00:16:21.909
<v Riley Bowman>We'll make that process difficult. And we'll also then create sensitive places,

00:16:22.669 --> 00:16:26.629
<v Riley Bowman>quote unquote, sensitive places, to make it as difficult as possible for a person

00:16:26.629 --> 00:16:28.969
<v Riley Bowman>to actually exercise that right to carry.

00:16:29.509 --> 00:16:32.609
<v Riley Bowman>And so we'll get to that one. That's out of Maryland here in a bit.

00:16:33.029 --> 00:16:36.889
<v Riley Bowman>Let's move to New York. We talked about, kind of teased in the opener,

00:16:37.229 --> 00:16:40.769
<v Riley Bowman>that it is all about the Glock Wars, it seems, all of a sudden.

00:16:40.929 --> 00:16:47.609
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, this kind of came out of, I don't know if I'd say out of nowhere exactly, but it is interesting.

00:16:48.269 --> 00:16:53.289
<v Riley Bowman>It just, this legislative session, multiple states are like,

00:16:53.449 --> 00:16:55.789
<v Riley Bowman>ooh, you know, let's get on this train.

00:16:56.309 --> 00:16:59.409
<v Riley Bowman>New York seemed to be kind of leading the way with this. Uh,

00:16:59.709 --> 00:17:05.209
<v Riley Bowman>they, so governor, uh, Hochul, uh, Kathy Hochul out of, uh.

00:17:06.289 --> 00:17:08.389
<v Riley Bowman>New York, she, uh, signed the

00:17:08.389 --> 00:17:13.769
<v Riley Bowman>bill on May 27th, uh, which actually was done as part of a budget bill.

00:17:13.769 --> 00:17:19.529
<v Riley Bowman>But within that is this ban on what they call convertible pistols.

00:17:20.529 --> 00:17:26.769
<v Riley Bowman>And specifically how they are defining this are any pistols that contain or

00:17:26.769 --> 00:17:31.029
<v Riley Bowman>use a quote unquote cruciform trigger bar.

00:17:31.809 --> 00:17:37.729
<v Riley Bowman>And that's key lingo because like Jacob or myself or if any of you have been

00:17:37.729 --> 00:17:42.769
<v Riley Bowman>through Glock Armors courses or you're just familiar with Glocks and how they work.

00:17:42.769 --> 00:17:46.329
<v Riley Bowman>You've bought parts for your Glocks, whatever, you know that the,

00:17:46.329 --> 00:17:50.369
<v Riley Bowman>the trigger bar, the trigger bar of the Glock has this piece,

00:17:50.549 --> 00:17:56.149
<v Riley Bowman>this, this portion that's referred to as a, as the cruciform. And, uh.

00:17:57.439 --> 00:18:04.559
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, okay, Jacob, uh, I, you may have gotten the wrong link, but,

00:18:04.559 --> 00:18:07.699
<v Riley Bowman>uh, so there's, it's two things here, Jacob, two things.

00:18:07.979 --> 00:18:13.499
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, so he's saying he didn't get the right story here, but, uh, two things here.

00:18:13.679 --> 00:18:21.699
<v Riley Bowman>We got, um, Glocks that, uh, New York is going after and also 3D printers,

00:18:22.179 --> 00:18:23.419
<v Riley Bowman>3D printer restrictions.

00:18:23.419 --> 00:18:26.919
<v Riley Bowman>And so let me let me i'll cover

00:18:26.919 --> 00:18:30.619
<v Riley Bowman>this glock piece and then you can talk about the 3d printer part but

00:18:30.619 --> 00:18:33.719
<v Riley Bowman>so on may 27th this

00:18:33.719 --> 00:18:43.379
<v Riley Bowman>bill 9005c was signed which makes basically the idea is to make it illegal to

00:18:43.379 --> 00:18:50.419
<v Riley Bowman>purchase a firearm that uses a cruciform trigger bar which without saying And

00:18:50.419 --> 00:18:53.379
<v Riley Bowman>Glock is saying Glock and Glock style handguns.

00:18:53.479 --> 00:18:55.679
<v Riley Bowman>So guns that use Glock type components.

00:18:55.919 --> 00:18:59.339
<v Riley Bowman>So you're talking like the new Ruger RX-M and things like that would probably

00:18:59.339 --> 00:19:00.899
<v Riley Bowman>fall into this category as well.

00:19:01.519 --> 00:19:04.839
<v Riley Bowman>So that's that piece. But also

00:19:04.839 --> 00:19:08.079
<v Riley Bowman>the bill is going to restrict or place restrictions upon 3D

00:19:08.079 --> 00:19:17.159
<v Riley Bowman>printers requiring firearm blueprint detection algorithms so that you can only

00:19:17.159 --> 00:19:23.919
<v Riley Bowman>buy or possess a 3D printer that has these algorithms built in so you can't

00:19:23.919 --> 00:19:27.059
<v Riley Bowman>go and print various firearm components.

00:19:27.539 --> 00:19:31.239
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's another piece of this bill. So Jacob, I'm sorry you didn't get

00:19:31.239 --> 00:19:39.559
<v Riley Bowman>the correct link on the Glock piece of this, but what did you find there about the 3D printer stuff?

00:19:41.037 --> 00:19:45.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I missed this. So apparently it's all one bill that addressed both of these things.

00:19:45.297 --> 00:19:49.437
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I just did a little more digging there while you were talking. I missed part of it.

00:19:50.777 --> 00:19:54.097
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we're going to see this as a pattern across several states in today's episode.

00:19:54.417 --> 00:19:58.337
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this appears to be one of those, you know, someone at the national level

00:19:58.337 --> 00:20:02.297
<v Jacob Paulsen>wrote it up and passed it down to the states who had the power to get it through.

00:20:02.297 --> 00:20:05.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we see it creeping. We see it in California. We'll see it in Illinois.

00:20:07.497 --> 00:20:10.417
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yeah, Glocks, apparently convertible pistols.

00:20:10.417 --> 00:20:13.637
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the other half of this is the 3d printer thing and this

00:20:13.637 --> 00:20:16.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>is wild so the idea

00:20:16.917 --> 00:20:19.757
<v Jacob Paulsen>here is that we want to force companies that

00:20:19.757 --> 00:20:23.337
<v Jacob Paulsen>make 3d printers to have

00:20:23.337 --> 00:20:28.737
<v Jacob Paulsen>built-in software that would detect if someone's trying to print a gun thing

00:20:28.737 --> 00:20:41.877
<v Jacob Paulsen>or a gun and block that and then we want to punish anyone who attempts to loophole that,

00:20:42.037 --> 00:20:46.737
<v Jacob Paulsen>anyone attempts to bypass, you know, these algorithms that would otherwise normally block you.

00:20:46.877 --> 00:20:51.657
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you like modify your firmware or hardware or something so as to get past

00:20:51.657 --> 00:20:55.217
<v Jacob Paulsen>this blockage that's been put into place by the manufacturer,

00:20:55.317 --> 00:20:57.877
<v Jacob Paulsen>then you also are committing a criminal act.

00:20:59.258 --> 00:21:01.958
<v Jacob Paulsen>Uh man i'm glad i'm not in the company i'm not in

00:21:01.958 --> 00:21:04.778
<v Jacob Paulsen>the industry of making 3d printers i guess that's what i'm thinking like

00:21:04.778 --> 00:21:08.418
<v Jacob Paulsen>how in the world is a 3d printing company like would

00:21:08.418 --> 00:21:11.378
<v Jacob Paulsen>you like i can't even imagine beginning to like

00:21:11.378 --> 00:21:14.338
<v Jacob Paulsen>craft software that's supposed to detect when

00:21:14.338 --> 00:21:17.678
<v Jacob Paulsen>something is in a shape that might be a gun part like that's

00:21:17.678 --> 00:21:20.378
<v Jacob Paulsen>nuts like like there's a lot of things going on there

00:21:20.378 --> 00:21:23.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>so anyway that uh that's the

00:21:23.198 --> 00:21:26.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>gist that that's the other half of this in new york is let's

00:21:26.938 --> 00:21:29.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>let's uh make illegal any convertible gun

00:21:29.938 --> 00:21:33.238
<v Jacob Paulsen>which is pretty broad and vague dangerous language

00:21:33.238 --> 00:21:36.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>but ultimately at least for now intended

00:21:36.118 --> 00:21:41.818
<v Jacob Paulsen>to target glock type guns anything that could put a glock switch on it and let's

00:21:41.818 --> 00:21:47.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>force 3d printers that you know in order to be sold in our state that they have

00:21:47.118 --> 00:21:53.278
<v Jacob Paulsen>to meet these requirements of detecting potential gun printing stuff yeah yeah

00:21:53.278 --> 00:21:57.578
<v Riley Bowman>So really what we have here is kind of a First Amendment and a Second Amendment

00:21:57.578 --> 00:22:02.138
<v Riley Bowman>issue going on in the state of New York, which is kind of interesting.

00:22:02.278 --> 00:22:07.498
<v Riley Bowman>It's not the first time that we've seen that kind of thing, but this is one

00:22:07.498 --> 00:22:15.378
<v Riley Bowman>of the first times I've seen a bill that is specifically trying to force companies

00:22:15.378 --> 00:22:21.458
<v Riley Bowman>to implement software that keeps you from being able to print certain parts.

00:22:22.198 --> 00:22:26.178
<v Riley Bowman>So in the past, I think the typical legal things,

00:22:26.438 --> 00:22:31.398
<v Riley Bowman>laws, and challenges we've seen have been more geared at the end user,

00:22:31.558 --> 00:22:38.738
<v Riley Bowman>where it's like, hey, if you possess certain 3D files to print things on your 3D printer,

00:22:38.998 --> 00:22:42.178
<v Riley Bowman>you know, firearm parts, then we'll come after you.

00:22:42.278 --> 00:22:47.098
<v Riley Bowman>But now it's like, let's attack it from this other angle, which is the producer

00:22:47.098 --> 00:22:51.238
<v Riley Bowman>of the machines, you know, so not the end user, but now the manufacturer.

00:22:51.458 --> 00:22:53.138
<v Riley Bowman>Of that technology.

00:22:53.398 --> 00:22:57.978
<v Riley Bowman>And so kind of an interesting approach, not a, not a, not a good one,

00:22:58.098 --> 00:22:59.438
<v Riley Bowman>but an interesting approach.

00:22:59.658 --> 00:23:02.178
<v Riley Bowman>It certainly tells the story that these.

00:23:04.506 --> 00:23:13.646
<v Riley Bowman>These not gun-friendly states and legislatures and governors and so forth will stop at nothing.

00:23:13.966 --> 00:23:18.826
<v Riley Bowman>They're throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what they can get to stick,

00:23:18.966 --> 00:23:22.886
<v Riley Bowman>seeing what they can push through, seeing what avenues they can attack.

00:23:22.886 --> 00:23:26.426
<v Riley Bowman>And they know, by the way, they know because of Heller, McDonald,

00:23:27.066 --> 00:23:32.606
<v Riley Bowman>Bruin, and so forth, that it's getting harder for them to craft legislation

00:23:32.606 --> 00:23:35.906
<v Riley Bowman>to come after guns specifically.

00:23:36.506 --> 00:23:40.146
<v Riley Bowman>And so they're getting a lot more creative with how they're going about that.

00:23:41.806 --> 00:23:47.806
<v Riley Bowman>I suspect there will be a major challenge on this cruciform trigger bar legislation,

00:23:47.806 --> 00:23:52.106
<v Riley Bowman>specifically targeting Glock and Glock design firearms.

00:23:52.886 --> 00:23:54.206
<v Riley Bowman>That'll be an interesting one

00:23:54.206 --> 00:23:57.826
<v Riley Bowman>to see play out. But I've never seen that language used before in a bill.

00:24:02.026 --> 00:24:02.926
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I...

00:24:04.722 --> 00:24:13.602
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that mostly what we are observing is that state legislative bodies do

00:24:13.602 --> 00:24:21.982
<v Jacob Paulsen>not care or take into consideration if something is constitutional before they propose,

00:24:22.142 --> 00:24:23.782
<v Jacob Paulsen>pass, vote, and pass it.

00:24:24.062 --> 00:24:24.542
<v Riley Bowman>Sure.

00:24:24.862 --> 00:24:29.002
<v Jacob Paulsen>And ultimately sign it into law by a governor. So, you know,

00:24:29.042 --> 00:24:32.902
<v Jacob Paulsen>I just don't think that that's – I don't think it's any more a relevant question

00:24:32.902 --> 00:24:36.442
<v Jacob Paulsen>to ask. Like, will this pass constitutional muster? It's like, so what?

00:24:36.982 --> 00:24:39.782
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Like what matters is we can get it done now.

00:24:40.622 --> 00:24:44.642
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if it doesn't pass constitutional muster, we're still buying years of having

00:24:44.642 --> 00:24:50.462
<v Jacob Paulsen>this in place of our constituents feeling like we did our part of getting reelected,

00:24:50.502 --> 00:24:54.102
<v Jacob Paulsen>of the powers that be, you know, in our party,

00:24:54.342 --> 00:24:56.962
<v Jacob Paulsen>recognizing that we did what we were asked to do.

00:24:57.562 --> 00:25:00.122
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway, for whatever it's worth, you know, you mentioned that.

00:25:00.222 --> 00:25:02.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I'm like, I don't think they care. Yeah.

00:25:04.102 --> 00:25:10.202
<v Riley Bowman>Yes, I agree. And I also think that things are more difficult for them.

00:25:10.382 --> 00:25:14.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I think to your point, though, what is highly relevant in this case is that

00:25:14.662 --> 00:25:23.502
<v Jacob Paulsen>when we pass a law designed to change consumer behavior and then we think consumers

00:25:23.502 --> 00:25:28.422
<v Jacob Paulsen>are basically not complying and then we realize we have no way to enforce it at all.

00:25:28.422 --> 00:25:32.442
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like there's zero possibility we can enforce this law we just passed.

00:25:32.902 --> 00:25:37.942
<v Jacob Paulsen>Then we had to pass more laws to help us enforce the thing that otherwise we

00:25:37.942 --> 00:25:40.122
<v Jacob Paulsen>can't enforce and no one is complying with.

00:25:40.582 --> 00:25:44.582
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's what's happening here. We pass a law that says you can't print this or

00:25:44.582 --> 00:25:47.002
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can't have files that would allow you to print this.

00:25:47.182 --> 00:25:50.602
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then we realize we have no way of enforcing. We have no way of regulating.

00:25:50.782 --> 00:25:52.082
<v Jacob Paulsen>We have no way of finding people.

00:25:52.302 --> 00:25:54.462
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like no one gives a crap. No one's complying.

00:25:54.702 --> 00:25:57.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's like, crap. Well, I guess that was a waste of time. What do we do next?

00:25:57.862 --> 00:26:04.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Oh, well, we make the people who make these machines, you know, we make them do stuff.

00:26:06.766 --> 00:26:12.086
<v Riley Bowman>There you have it. Out of California, four anti-gun bills advancing simultaneously

00:26:12.086 --> 00:26:15.586
<v Riley Bowman>reported on the nraila.org's website.

00:26:16.906 --> 00:26:23.826
<v Riley Bowman>There's four bills here, Senate Bill 948, which is a permit to purchase scheme.

00:26:24.086 --> 00:26:31.126
<v Riley Bowman>And this is a four-hour live fire course required to buy any firearm in California.

00:26:31.126 --> 00:26:35.846
<v Riley Bowman>So really going a step further than what we've seen here past recently in Colorado,

00:26:36.186 --> 00:26:39.066
<v Riley Bowman>which is more geared towards semi-automatic rifles.

00:26:39.306 --> 00:26:44.386
<v Riley Bowman>But in California, this bill would be to require you to go through this course

00:26:44.386 --> 00:26:46.586
<v Riley Bowman>to buy any fire in California.

00:26:46.726 --> 00:26:49.846
<v Riley Bowman>Now, the one thing that's interesting there is, as it's written right now,

00:26:50.586 --> 00:26:53.466
<v Riley Bowman>concealed permit holders would be exempted.

00:26:53.466 --> 00:26:57.506
<v Riley Bowman>They would basically be considered to have the training necessary already,

00:26:57.546 --> 00:27:01.986
<v Riley Bowman>which, I mean, you would think makes sense, especially since I think in California,

00:27:02.086 --> 00:27:04.626
<v Riley Bowman>don't you have to have like 16 hours, I think, of training?

00:27:05.346 --> 00:27:08.706
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, eight. I'm probably thinking it's New Mexico that requires 16, huh?

00:27:08.826 --> 00:27:11.766
<v Jacob Paulsen>New Mexico, 15. Illinois, 16.

00:27:11.946 --> 00:27:13.006
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Those are your big ones.

00:27:15.046 --> 00:27:17.506
<v Riley Bowman>You know, so you think, yeah, okay, that makes sense. I mean,

00:27:17.606 --> 00:27:21.326
<v Riley Bowman>if you think that sort of thing makes sense. But it's kind of, I mean, anyway, yeah.

00:27:21.426 --> 00:27:23.926
<v Riley Bowman>And here in Colorado, as you just already elaborated, Jacob,

00:27:24.206 --> 00:27:27.046
<v Riley Bowman>if you have a permit, sorry, it doesn't count, you know, for that.

00:27:27.226 --> 00:27:30.326
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, there's no crossover at all. Though I think that that's something we will

00:27:30.326 --> 00:27:34.906
<v Jacob Paulsen>see proposed and potentially changed here in Colorado. But yeah.

00:27:35.126 --> 00:27:35.366
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:27:36.168 --> 00:27:43.148
<v Riley Bowman>Also, Assembly Bill 2047 is the exact same approach that New York we just talked about there.

00:27:43.308 --> 00:27:47.008
<v Riley Bowman>It's a 3D printer blocking technology bill.

00:27:48.148 --> 00:27:52.468
<v Riley Bowman>So interesting to see that. I mean, it is, but it's not terribly surprising

00:27:52.468 --> 00:27:56.628
<v Riley Bowman>because, I mean, you know, these people are talking behind closed doors,

00:27:56.768 --> 00:27:58.308
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob. They have friends everywhere.

00:27:58.528 --> 00:28:01.928
<v Riley Bowman>They're like, oh, what's my buddy in New York doing? Oh, they're passing this.

00:28:02.048 --> 00:28:03.768
<v Riley Bowman>Well, that sounds good. Let's do that.

00:28:03.768 --> 00:28:07.448
<v Jacob Paulsen>Here in California. I think it's worse than that. I think it's more like,

00:28:07.708 --> 00:28:13.148
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, I'm a party leader at the national level and I'm calling up all of my state

00:28:13.148 --> 00:28:16.428
<v Jacob Paulsen>people and saying, you need to propose a bill like this one. Here you go.

00:28:17.398 --> 00:28:23.938
<v Riley Bowman>I know. No, I hate the fact that it's, yes, no, it's a national coordinated strategy.

00:28:24.038 --> 00:28:28.378
<v Riley Bowman>And that's why it's important for us to learn what's going on in these states.

00:28:28.498 --> 00:28:31.398
<v Riley Bowman>That's why I talked about what's going on in Colorado a little bit ago and saying,

00:28:31.538 --> 00:28:34.418
<v Riley Bowman>you know, this is the sort of thing that's coming to your doorstep,

00:28:34.418 --> 00:28:38.498
<v Riley Bowman>maybe not next year, maybe not even in five years, but this is something that

00:28:38.498 --> 00:28:41.118
<v Riley Bowman>could come to your doorstep down the road.

00:28:41.118 --> 00:28:44.898
<v Riley Bowman>And it's good to know what the strategies are and to be ready for them and try

00:28:44.898 --> 00:28:46.258
<v Riley Bowman>to fight back against them.

00:28:46.818 --> 00:28:51.558
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think it's worth understanding too that a viable possible byproduct of this

00:28:51.558 --> 00:28:54.098
<v Jacob Paulsen>kind of thing if you live in one of those states is you're not gonna be able

00:28:54.098 --> 00:28:59.878
<v Jacob Paulsen>to buy a 3d printer anymore right like an optional choice for the 3d printer

00:28:59.878 --> 00:29:04.038
<v Jacob Paulsen>manufacturers is to just no longer sell to those states right like oh you live

00:29:04.038 --> 00:29:06.618
<v Jacob Paulsen>in california you can't buy our product right

00:29:06.618 --> 00:29:12.218
<v Riley Bowman>Right yeah and of course i mean talk about enforcement jacob uh i mean who's

00:29:12.218 --> 00:29:16.478
<v Riley Bowman>this who's to say i don't just go across you know state lines and buy a 3D printer

00:29:16.478 --> 00:29:20.518
<v Riley Bowman>at Best Buy in Nevada or Arizona or whatever, right?

00:29:21.278 --> 00:29:27.478
<v Riley Bowman>Go for it. But anyway, also Assembly Bill 1743 is a database expansion.

00:29:30.018 --> 00:29:33.958
<v Riley Bowman>So this is a big issue, Jacob, because as we know, as you know,

00:29:34.158 --> 00:29:39.918
<v Riley Bowman>a few years ago, there was a major issue where the entire database of concealed

00:29:39.918 --> 00:29:45.298
<v Riley Bowman>carry permit holders in California was basically dumped publicly.

00:29:45.518 --> 00:29:51.458
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I think we have to go back a step before that to build a foundation to

00:29:51.458 --> 00:29:53.598
<v Jacob Paulsen>understand this because –

00:29:54.794 --> 00:30:00.734
<v Jacob Paulsen>The federal law since 1986 prohibits the creation of a database of gun owners

00:30:00.734 --> 00:30:09.554
<v Jacob Paulsen>by any governing body, anyone, whether a state, city, any political subdivision thereof.

00:30:09.794 --> 00:30:14.234
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's already – you can't do that. Now, the problem is that when this law

00:30:14.234 --> 00:30:17.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>was passed, it was part of the FOPA, the Fire and Motor Protection Act.

00:30:17.974 --> 00:30:22.574
<v Jacob Paulsen>When that law was passed, you had a handful of jurisdictions who were already

00:30:22.574 --> 00:30:25.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>doing it, and they were effectively grandfathered in.

00:30:26.314 --> 00:30:31.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, California is one of those. So despite it being against the law at a federal

00:30:31.114 --> 00:30:36.194
<v Jacob Paulsen>level for California to have a database of humans and their guns,

00:30:36.794 --> 00:30:38.214
<v Jacob Paulsen>California has one anyway.

00:30:38.694 --> 00:30:43.274
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so that's the first kind of prerequisite to this is understanding that California

00:30:43.274 --> 00:30:44.774
<v Jacob Paulsen>already does have a database.

00:30:46.094 --> 00:30:49.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>Whereas most of you listening to this are like, does my state do that?

00:30:49.794 --> 00:30:52.814
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, no, your state doesn't do that and can't start doing it.

00:30:52.954 --> 00:30:56.334
<v Jacob Paulsen>It would be against federal law. But California has done it,

00:30:56.554 --> 00:31:00.054
<v Jacob Paulsen>does do it, and still does it. And now they want to expand on it.

00:31:00.174 --> 00:31:04.574
<v Jacob Paulsen>And to your point, Riley, I think it's absolutely relevant to mention that they

00:31:04.574 --> 00:31:06.994
<v Jacob Paulsen>don't have a track record of protecting the data.

00:31:08.810 --> 00:31:12.470
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, they had a major data breach back, I think it was 2022,

00:31:12.470 --> 00:31:19.490
<v Riley Bowman>which, I mean, basically you're talking about the whole state.

00:31:20.610 --> 00:31:25.490
<v Riley Bowman>I think at that time, was that firearm owners or I thought it was permittees?

00:31:26.070 --> 00:31:26.870
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think it was both.

00:31:27.070 --> 00:31:27.930
<v Riley Bowman>Maybe it was both.

00:31:28.190 --> 00:31:29.770
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was California Department of Justice.

00:31:30.190 --> 00:31:33.610
<v Riley Bowman>Right, right. Right. I mean, we're talking names, addresses,

00:31:34.410 --> 00:31:37.290
<v Riley Bowman>you know, some other personally identifying information.

00:31:37.990 --> 00:31:43.210
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah, they want to expand with this bill that they're proposing this session.

00:31:43.450 --> 00:31:49.990
<v Riley Bowman>They want to expand who has access to that database, who that is shared with

00:31:49.990 --> 00:31:55.610
<v Riley Bowman>within, you know, government and other entities within the state.

00:31:55.610 --> 00:31:59.610
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah, that just, you know, increases the risk that we'll have another

00:31:59.610 --> 00:32:05.350
<v Riley Bowman>major failure of, you know, a data breach again. So that's super cool.

00:32:06.190 --> 00:32:12.170
<v Riley Bowman>And then Assembly Bill 1753 would clarify California's gun violence restraining order.

00:32:12.610 --> 00:32:18.110
<v Riley Bowman>So they basically want to add ammunition as a part of that.

00:32:18.310 --> 00:32:20.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is phenomenal. This cracks me up.

00:32:20.930 --> 00:32:21.090
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:32:21.870 --> 00:32:24.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>Go ahead. The irony of this is amazing, right? Yeah.

00:32:25.610 --> 00:32:31.870
<v Jacob Paulsen>If the existing law was working, then we wouldn't need to take your ammo,

00:32:31.890 --> 00:32:33.250
<v Riley Bowman>Right?

00:32:33.390 --> 00:32:42.510
<v Jacob Paulsen>If someone files a red flag order on Joe Smith in California,

00:32:42.770 --> 00:32:46.850
<v Jacob Paulsen>and the cops show up and take all his guns and leave,

00:32:48.366 --> 00:32:52.626
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if that was functional, if they thought their own law was working,

00:32:52.626 --> 00:32:56.986
<v Jacob Paulsen>then we would have no need to tack ammo onto that. None.

00:32:57.466 --> 00:33:01.646
<v Jacob Paulsen>It would be unnecessary. So the fact that they're saying, hey, no, we need to be taken.

00:33:01.866 --> 00:33:05.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's not enough that we're just taking these people's guns for some potentially,

00:33:05.906 --> 00:33:08.506
<v Jacob Paulsen>for at least a temporary but potentially a permanent period of time.

00:33:08.666 --> 00:33:12.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we also think we need to take their ammo. It's like, why?

00:33:12.766 --> 00:33:16.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, why exactly would you need to take their ammo if you already took their guns?

00:33:16.606 --> 00:33:22.366
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like it is ironic because it is exposing the absolute failure of the existing

00:33:22.366 --> 00:33:30.346
<v Jacob Paulsen>legislation and adding ammo to it can't possibly help whatever failures already exist in the concept.

00:33:32.595 --> 00:33:35.835
<v Riley Bowman>Well said. Yeah, I couldn't agree more with that.

00:33:36.055 --> 00:33:41.355
<v Riley Bowman>So these four bills continue to advance in the California state legislature.

00:33:41.855 --> 00:33:47.155
<v Riley Bowman>I would strongly encourage if you're a Californian to be working all the channels

00:33:47.155 --> 00:33:53.795
<v Riley Bowman>that you can, contacting everybody you can, all of your legislators, your senators,

00:33:54.375 --> 00:33:58.355
<v Riley Bowman>your, you know, the governor even, you know, but also talking to your friends

00:33:58.355 --> 00:34:00.795
<v Riley Bowman>and family and those that you know that care about this stuff.

00:34:00.795 --> 00:34:04.615
<v Riley Bowman>Like this should be a topic of discussion so that people are made aware,

00:34:04.655 --> 00:34:12.075
<v Riley Bowman>because unfortunately, what I see so, so often is a serious lack of,

00:34:12.315 --> 00:34:16.955
<v Riley Bowman>well, really not lack of, but serious apathy towards, you know,

00:34:17.315 --> 00:34:20.175
<v Riley Bowman>well, there's not a lot we can do about it. They're just going to do it anyway.

00:34:20.735 --> 00:34:27.195
<v Riley Bowman>Well, you know, if we just roll over and take it, well, you know,

00:34:27.375 --> 00:34:30.735
<v Riley Bowman>there's no other option, really. you know what's going to happen.

00:34:31.035 --> 00:34:35.395
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, major issues there out of California. Let's go to Illinois.

00:34:36.375 --> 00:34:41.615
<v Riley Bowman>So we're talking about Glock Wars. Okay. So the story out of Illinois is Illinois

00:34:41.615 --> 00:34:44.175
<v Riley Bowman>is also going after Glocks.

00:34:44.835 --> 00:34:49.975
<v Riley Bowman>And the way they're describing this is machine gun convertible pistols,

00:34:50.955 --> 00:34:57.835
<v Riley Bowman>with a definition that's broad enough to include in that Glocks and probably

00:34:57.835 --> 00:35:01.035
<v Riley Bowman>a number of other similar striker-fired handguns.

00:35:01.495 --> 00:35:05.035
<v Riley Bowman>Basically, if the handgun could be easily, you know,

00:35:05.535 --> 00:35:10.935
<v Riley Bowman>supposedly easily modified to turn it into a full automatic pistol,

00:35:11.255 --> 00:35:16.515
<v Riley Bowman>then that's the intent here, is for them to try to, you know,

00:35:16.775 --> 00:35:18.855
<v Riley Bowman>restrict your ability to purchase or.

00:35:20.595 --> 00:35:26.715
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, yeah, or own these. And so, and it's not just, uh, Illinois,

00:35:26.915 --> 00:35:29.115
<v Riley Bowman>New York, we've talked about now, but Maryland as well.

00:35:29.355 --> 00:35:32.435
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. Uh, we're not going to cover Maryland specifically, but just know that

00:35:32.435 --> 00:35:39.035
<v Riley Bowman>same sort of legislation legislation is trying to advance in the state of Maryland as well.

00:35:39.935 --> 00:35:43.575
<v Riley Bowman>So, uh, you know, they've, they've, they've tried to go after the specific,

00:35:43.795 --> 00:35:45.055
<v Riley Bowman>you know, Glock switches.

00:35:45.255 --> 00:35:48.255
<v Jacob Paulsen>Jacob, um, which are already illegal.

00:35:48.735 --> 00:35:52.075
<v Riley Bowman>Correct. Right. Unless you have, the proper licensing through

00:35:52.075 --> 00:35:55.515
<v Riley Bowman>the atf uh you got to have an sot yeah

00:35:55.515 --> 00:35:58.895
<v Riley Bowman>to basically possess and or manufacture such

00:35:58.895 --> 00:36:06.535
<v Riley Bowman>things uh but uh anyway whatever they're doing is not working they feel and

00:36:06.535 --> 00:36:12.175
<v Riley Bowman>so next step let's just go after the specific type of firearm that those switches

00:36:12.175 --> 00:36:17.215
<v Riley Bowman>can be used on so there you go that's what's going on in illinois there's.

00:36:17.215 --> 00:36:21.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>Some great irony here because maybe irony is the wrong word,

00:36:21.335 --> 00:36:27.095
<v Jacob Paulsen>but isn't there some issue, concern, thought to the fact that most of these

00:36:27.095 --> 00:36:30.215
<v Jacob Paulsen>states have law enforcement agencies using that gun?

00:36:31.555 --> 00:36:35.495
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you go read the statutes, law enforcement are generally exempted.

00:36:35.755 --> 00:36:39.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it doesn't, in a practical way, impact law enforcement.

00:36:40.015 --> 00:36:40.195
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:36:40.415 --> 00:36:44.035
<v Jacob Paulsen>But there's got to be something like, wait a minute, you're saying civilians

00:36:44.035 --> 00:36:51.735
<v Jacob Paulsen>can't own the thing that all the cops are carrying because it has a safety defect,

00:36:51.735 --> 00:36:53.675
<v Jacob Paulsen>basically, is what you're claiming.

00:36:53.935 --> 00:36:56.295
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the cops have it, then we have no problem with that.

00:36:57.015 --> 00:36:58.895
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's something off with that, man.

00:36:59.415 --> 00:37:02.175
<v Riley Bowman>Well, yeah, 100%. I mean, it's all off.

00:37:03.255 --> 00:37:10.875
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'll also just quickly add that several of your Pro 2A support groups have filed

00:37:10.875 --> 00:37:13.255
<v Jacob Paulsen>a joint lawsuit against the state of Maryland.

00:37:13.635 --> 00:37:17.275
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we haven't seen lawsuits against all these states. And some of them are still

00:37:17.275 --> 00:37:19.415
<v Jacob Paulsen>moving, like California's things, for example.

00:37:19.655 --> 00:37:24.835
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we have seen very quickly after Maryland passed their anti-Glock.

00:37:25.235 --> 00:37:28.815
<v Jacob Paulsen>I like your Glock war thing. I want to run with that. After Maryland passed

00:37:28.815 --> 00:37:33.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>their Glock war law, we saw immediately lawsuits filed.

00:37:33.595 --> 00:37:36.435
<v Jacob Paulsen>I know FPC was involved. I know Anna Ray is on that lawsuit.

00:37:36.655 --> 00:37:38.735
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's probably others too I've already forgotten about.

00:37:39.135 --> 00:37:44.675
<v Jacob Paulsen>But anyway, so there is some action being taken, at least to Maryland for sure,

00:37:44.855 --> 00:37:47.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>by these pro-gun right groups.

00:37:47.195 --> 00:37:56.495
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. It's super concerning that, I mean, obviously any attack on our rights

00:37:56.495 --> 00:37:59.455
<v Riley Bowman>is a concern. It's a big issue.

00:38:00.035 --> 00:38:04.495
<v Riley Bowman>It's especially concerning that with this approach that they are going after

00:38:04.495 --> 00:38:09.935
<v Riley Bowman>a specific company. I mean, and I know that probably the way they're trying

00:38:09.935 --> 00:38:15.015
<v Riley Bowman>to word these things is to try to avoid calling out specifically Glock Inc.

00:38:16.855 --> 00:38:20.275
<v Riley Bowman>But in essence, what they're doing is going after a specific company.

00:38:21.915 --> 00:38:28.075
<v Riley Bowman>And that's, I mean, isn't there something constitutionally that makes that?

00:38:30.731 --> 00:38:39.391
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, I mean, we do have a law that basically says you can't hold, like you can't sue.

00:38:39.551 --> 00:38:44.731
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can't hold civilly liable a company who makes themselves a product that

00:38:44.731 --> 00:38:47.271
<v Jacob Paulsen>is lawful because it was used in an unlawful way.

00:38:47.951 --> 00:38:53.291
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that exists, though we have our own battle over that one certainly all the time.

00:38:54.351 --> 00:38:57.611
<v Jacob Paulsen>But yeah, can they just ban a certain product?

00:38:57.751 --> 00:39:03.611
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, I think they can. I think that it's constitutionally viable in theory.

00:39:04.031 --> 00:39:10.711
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think it's constitutionally viable in theory to say, hey, we don't want Toyotas

00:39:10.711 --> 00:39:16.831
<v Jacob Paulsen>to be sold in our state because we think that Toyotas have this issue,

00:39:17.031 --> 00:39:21.051
<v Jacob Paulsen>that they have this safety concern, that they put the public at safety.

00:39:21.211 --> 00:39:27.831
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that's constitutionally would pass muster. But this is not that per se, right?

00:39:27.831 --> 00:39:32.731
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is something else entirely because this is something that is a commonly

00:39:32.731 --> 00:39:39.911
<v Jacob Paulsen>used, probably the most commonly used style of semi-automatic or of any handguns.

00:39:39.991 --> 00:39:46.131
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is the most commonly purchased and owned style of handgun in the country.

00:39:46.791 --> 00:39:51.191
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that makes it constitutionally protected when it's in common use,

00:39:51.471 --> 00:39:55.491
<v Jacob Paulsen>specifically as a gun. Because that's what the Supreme Court said is that guns

00:39:55.491 --> 00:39:58.531
<v Jacob Paulsen>in common use like this are protected.

00:39:59.291 --> 00:40:06.211
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I think that you would have to really demonstrably show that it is a risk

00:40:06.211 --> 00:40:11.011
<v Jacob Paulsen>to public health in order to have this pass muster. And I don't think they can

00:40:11.011 --> 00:40:12.531
<v Jacob Paulsen>do that. I don't think they can come anywhere close to that.

00:40:12.671 --> 00:40:15.851
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that – in fact, I would love to see, and I've not seen this anywhere.

00:40:16.031 --> 00:40:19.791
<v Jacob Paulsen>Maybe someone can go pull some data and try and dig this up.

00:40:19.791 --> 00:40:25.431
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I would love to see the number of firearm deaths that they can attribute to converted glocks.

00:40:26.807 --> 00:40:31.087
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm guessing it's a pretty small percentage of firearm-related deaths.

00:40:31.167 --> 00:40:34.787
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact, I bet you it's not a tenth of 1%.

00:40:34.787 --> 00:40:38.027
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. I don't think you're wrong at all with that.

00:40:38.607 --> 00:40:51.187
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, so an awful lot of political just work that's happening to supposedly affect a very,

00:40:51.287 --> 00:40:55.267
<v Riley Bowman>very small amount of public benefit.

00:40:57.107 --> 00:41:01.687
<v Riley Bowman>What I think I was thinking of, Jacob, is the Bill of Attainer Clause in Article 1 of the U.S.

00:41:01.767 --> 00:41:05.187
<v Riley Bowman>Constitution, which prevents governments from passing a specific legislation

00:41:05.187 --> 00:41:06.827
<v Riley Bowman>that targets one company.

00:41:07.147 --> 00:41:12.887
<v Riley Bowman>And I know in this case, like, now you have multiple companies making Glock variants, right?

00:41:13.007 --> 00:41:15.807
<v Riley Bowman>And so in that way, maybe that's, you know, but still, like,

00:41:15.867 --> 00:41:18.847
<v Riley Bowman>this very much is geared at Glock.

00:41:19.487 --> 00:41:23.027
<v Riley Bowman>But, yeah, I mean, you got Glock. You got Ruger now with the RXM.

00:41:23.027 --> 00:41:27.307
<v Riley Bowman>You've got, of course, Shadow Systems has been out for a while now with their

00:41:27.307 --> 00:41:29.607
<v Riley Bowman>own variant, right? And there's several others, right?

00:41:30.007 --> 00:41:33.727
<v Riley Bowman>I'm just mentioning, you know, probably the three most currently popular models.

00:41:34.687 --> 00:41:39.247
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah, very interesting to see this legislation moving forward.

00:41:39.587 --> 00:41:44.027
<v Riley Bowman>But like we said, this is the new tactic, just finding another workaround.

00:41:44.887 --> 00:41:49.947
<v Riley Bowman>Now let's go to New Jersey, where the, this one's, talk about,

00:41:49.987 --> 00:41:53.007
<v Riley Bowman>you know, firearm owner records.

00:41:54.287 --> 00:41:59.287
<v Riley Bowman>You've got. And this is, again, a Glock-related thing. So this is just crazy, Jacob.

00:41:59.527 --> 00:42:06.127
<v Riley Bowman>So the New Jersey Attorney General has subpoenaed statewide firearm dealers,

00:42:06.767 --> 00:42:10.667
<v Riley Bowman>for the last 10 years of their records.

00:42:11.027 --> 00:42:18.407
<v Riley Bowman>So presumably, we're talking, you know, like standard, like the form you go

00:42:18.407 --> 00:42:21.587
<v Riley Bowman>and fill out, 4473, okay, okay.

00:42:22.765 --> 00:42:27.785
<v Riley Bowman>FFLs in New Jersey, we want your records for the last 10 years,

00:42:27.925 --> 00:42:34.085
<v Riley Bowman>your 4473s for anything Glock related, buyer names, addresses,

00:42:34.745 --> 00:42:37.465
<v Riley Bowman>serial numbers, and so forth.

00:42:38.285 --> 00:42:43.025
<v Riley Bowman>This stems from a public nuisance lawsuit against Glock Inc.

00:42:43.325 --> 00:42:47.825
<v Riley Bowman>Speaking of Glock, Davenport versus Glock is the case.

00:42:48.885 --> 00:42:52.285
<v Riley Bowman>And so there's this case going on.

00:42:52.765 --> 00:42:58.725
<v Riley Bowman>The Attorney General's office has requested this data as related to that case.

00:42:58.865 --> 00:43:05.725
<v Riley Bowman>The problem with that is that a subpoena like this would make those records public record.

00:43:07.305 --> 00:43:08.925
<v Riley Bowman>And so, yeah.

00:43:11.285 --> 00:43:16.505
<v Riley Bowman>New Jerseyans, especially if you bought a Glock in the last 10 years,

00:43:16.805 --> 00:43:21.885
<v Riley Bowman>your information could become publicly known to that fact.

00:43:22.825 --> 00:43:28.045
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, this is going to be a big will not comply scenario. I just think the average

00:43:28.045 --> 00:43:30.245
<v Jacob Paulsen>gun store is going to be like, F you.

00:43:31.265 --> 00:43:34.345
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's no world. I give you these records.

00:43:35.945 --> 00:43:39.285
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I mean, on one hand, you kind of see where the attorney general is coming

00:43:39.285 --> 00:43:40.765
<v Jacob Paulsen>from. Hey, we're in a lawsuit.

00:43:41.285 --> 00:43:46.665
<v Jacob Paulsen>In order to justify the claim that we're making in this lawsuit,

00:43:46.845 --> 00:43:48.525
<v Jacob Paulsen>we need data. We need figures.

00:43:48.745 --> 00:43:51.965
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's what the court wants to see. The court wants to see how many of these

00:43:51.965 --> 00:43:52.865
<v Jacob Paulsen>guns are we talking about?

00:43:53.065 --> 00:43:56.165
<v Jacob Paulsen>And by the way, they're not just soliciting the transactional data,

00:43:56.305 --> 00:43:59.465
<v Jacob Paulsen>who bought it, address, date, sale, firearm deed to make models,

00:43:59.525 --> 00:44:00.125
<v Jacob Paulsen>certain number, caliber.

00:44:00.785 --> 00:44:05.145
<v Jacob Paulsen>They're also subpoenaing information on how dealers obtained a Glock inventory,

00:44:05.625 --> 00:44:10.225
<v Jacob Paulsen>contracts or agreements with Glock, communications with Glock concerning sales,

00:44:10.705 --> 00:44:15.505
<v Jacob Paulsen>marketing switches or automatic fire capability, all records related to advertising and marketing.

00:44:16.779 --> 00:44:21.199
<v Jacob Paulsen>So they're trying to find any evidence they can find to support their lawsuit,

00:44:21.379 --> 00:44:27.299
<v Jacob Paulsen>which is that Glock knowingly made and sold a product that they knew could be

00:44:27.299 --> 00:44:30.639
<v Jacob Paulsen>easily or readily converted into an illegal product.

00:44:30.819 --> 00:44:30.979
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:44:31.259 --> 00:44:34.739
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. And if they can show that because like, oh, look, the sales material

00:44:34.739 --> 00:44:39.579
<v Jacob Paulsen>that they distributed to their dealers showed that it was compatible with,

00:44:39.679 --> 00:44:41.899
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, it could be converted, which is ridiculous.

00:44:42.099 --> 00:44:45.339
<v Jacob Paulsen>It definitely did not show that. Glock would never do that.

00:44:46.079 --> 00:44:48.719
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, that's what they're trying to dig up, right? They're trying to come

00:44:48.719 --> 00:44:53.039
<v Jacob Paulsen>up with data and evidence to back the claim in the lawsuit.

00:44:53.279 --> 00:44:57.579
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if this had nothing to do with guns, if it was about something else entirely,

00:44:57.579 --> 00:45:02.099
<v Jacob Paulsen>it might be a viable ask or subpoena in this case.

00:45:02.239 --> 00:45:06.839
<v Jacob Paulsen>But because it's about guns specifically, it's a massive problem.

00:45:08.239 --> 00:45:13.659
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's criminal, probably. At very least, it's highly concerning relative to your privacy.

00:45:15.339 --> 00:45:21.079
<v Riley Bowman>I had to look this up, Jacob, because I was curious, like, who invented the Glock switch? Okay.

00:45:21.579 --> 00:45:25.579
<v Riley Bowman>Because, I mean, to your point, like, as you're explaining, part of the case

00:45:25.579 --> 00:45:29.999
<v Riley Bowman>here is, well, did Glock knowingly manufacture,

00:45:30.579 --> 00:45:36.139
<v Riley Bowman>sell, market their product that it could be easily and readily converted into

00:45:36.139 --> 00:45:37.939
<v Riley Bowman>essentially a machine pistol, right?

00:45:38.379 --> 00:45:43.179
<v Riley Bowman>And it's like, well, Glock already made a Glock 18 going back decades now.

00:45:43.839 --> 00:45:49.499
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, it is the second available model by, you know, if you know anything

00:45:49.499 --> 00:45:51.619
<v Riley Bowman>about Glocks, you know that they started with the 17,

00:45:51.959 --> 00:45:56.359
<v Riley Bowman>the 18 was the second thing that they made, which was a fully automatic Glock

00:45:56.359 --> 00:46:01.999
<v Riley Bowman>17 that was only intended to be marketed for military and governmental use. Okay.

00:46:02.599 --> 00:46:07.779
<v Riley Bowman>And so it's like, they didn't make it knowing that a Mr.

00:46:09.119 --> 00:46:12.539
<v Riley Bowman>Jorge A. Leon, a Venezuelan gunsmith, Yes.

00:46:13.304 --> 00:46:17.124
<v Riley Bowman>Would invent the glock switch okay so

00:46:17.124 --> 00:46:20.584
<v Riley Bowman>the glock switch was invented by jorge a

00:46:20.584 --> 00:46:27.384
<v Riley Bowman>leon in 1987 a venezuelan gunsmith he was age 22 at the time intending it to

00:46:27.384 --> 00:46:32.684
<v Riley Bowman>be authorized for military swat and police counterterrorism units he secured

00:46:32.684 --> 00:46:37.364
<v Riley Bowman>a u.s patent for it in 1998 which expired in 2016,

00:46:38.044 --> 00:46:41.524
<v Riley Bowman>there's a little bit of history on the glock switch so.

00:46:41.524 --> 00:46:44.224
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well is there like isn't there

00:46:44.224 --> 00:46:47.204
<v Jacob Paulsen>some reality too where these these legislatures and people

00:46:47.204 --> 00:46:50.904
<v Jacob Paulsen>like they need to understand how impractical impractical

00:46:50.904 --> 00:46:54.204
<v Jacob Paulsen>of a gun this this creates yeah right right like

00:46:54.204 --> 00:46:58.224
<v Jacob Paulsen>like no one who cares about being effective

00:46:58.224 --> 00:47:01.204
<v Jacob Paulsen>with a gun would would convert their

00:47:01.204 --> 00:47:04.084
<v Jacob Paulsen>glock into fully i mean people do it for entertainment it is

00:47:04.084 --> 00:47:07.804
<v Jacob Paulsen>an entertainment product maybe there's some gang

00:47:07.804 --> 00:47:11.124
<v Jacob Paulsen>hoodlum intimidation coolness factor

00:47:11.124 --> 00:47:16.504
<v Jacob Paulsen>that i i'm not privy to but in any practical sense like converting your glock

00:47:16.504 --> 00:47:23.164
<v Jacob Paulsen>into a fully automatic effectively fully automatic gun uh is silly yeah it's

00:47:23.164 --> 00:47:29.464
<v Jacob Paulsen>impractic it's not effective it's not efficient as a as a tool of anything i

00:47:29.464 --> 00:47:33.604
<v Riley Bowman>Think i think there is i mean i i think what they are seeing on the streets

00:47:33.604 --> 00:47:37.004
<v Riley Bowman>is gang member usage primarily.

00:47:37.384 --> 00:47:41.444
<v Riley Bowman>And then it's mostly a tool of intimidation. I think that's really what it is.

00:47:41.484 --> 00:47:44.304
<v Jacob Paulsen>Spraying bullets. Well, it's not good. I'm not suggesting the spraying bullets

00:47:44.304 --> 00:47:48.424
<v Jacob Paulsen>on American public streets is not a public safety hazard.

00:47:48.544 --> 00:47:49.164
<v Riley Bowman>Right, right, right.

00:47:49.264 --> 00:47:55.804
<v Jacob Paulsen>It is. But to suggest that this is being widely adopted as a way to make these

00:47:55.804 --> 00:47:57.604
<v Jacob Paulsen>guns more lethal feels a little silly.

00:47:57.844 --> 00:47:58.244
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, yeah.

00:47:59.423 --> 00:48:04.843
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, I agree. I agree with that. Well, hopefully.

00:48:05.083 --> 00:48:07.883
<v Jacob Paulsen>And certainly our Venezuelan friend, if he thought that SWAT teams and police

00:48:07.883 --> 00:48:10.763
<v Jacob Paulsen>departments everywhere were going to be like, sweet, this is a great idea.

00:48:10.763 --> 00:48:12.243
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm sure he was sorely disappointed.

00:48:13.663 --> 00:48:20.683
<v Riley Bowman>It does say, and this is an article back on abcnews.com,

00:48:21.783 --> 00:48:26.483
<v Riley Bowman>a number of years ago, where he expressed regret for having invented the device

00:48:26.483 --> 00:48:30.983
<v Riley Bowman>because of how it's now being used. Okay. Anyway.

00:48:33.663 --> 00:48:37.063
<v Riley Bowman>Hopefully your dealers in New Jersey will not comply with these subpoenas.

00:48:37.883 --> 00:48:39.663
<v Riley Bowman>Because again, this is deeply concerning.

00:48:40.523 --> 00:48:46.903
<v Riley Bowman>This is, yeah, those 4473s are, dealers are supposed to hold on to them for at least 10 years.

00:48:47.763 --> 00:48:52.023
<v Riley Bowman>That's a record keeping purpose. I mean, that's debatable right there too.

00:48:52.183 --> 00:48:54.983
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, like that's people, there's plenty of people that do not like the fact

00:48:54.983 --> 00:48:58.443
<v Riley Bowman>that those are not like almost immediately threaded.

00:48:58.443 --> 00:49:05.083
<v Riley Bowman>And discarded, but as of right now, that they're intended for the dealer to

00:49:05.083 --> 00:49:10.463
<v Riley Bowman>have, for the dealer to have personally, not personally, but you know what I

00:49:10.463 --> 00:49:13.243
<v Riley Bowman>mean, to hold within their books.

00:49:14.241 --> 00:49:18.941
<v Riley Bowman>And that they can be then be audited upon by the ATF. That's it.

00:49:19.121 --> 00:49:20.301
<v Riley Bowman>That's really all it's supposed to be.

00:49:21.181 --> 00:49:28.681
<v Riley Bowman>To have them put out there in the public eye or view would not be good or consistent

00:49:28.681 --> 00:49:31.921
<v Riley Bowman>with how those forms were intended to be used.

00:49:32.641 --> 00:49:35.341
<v Riley Bowman>Hey, real quick, before we give you the last couple stories here,

00:49:35.801 --> 00:49:44.141
<v Riley Bowman>we recently announced a major update, Jacob, to the Concealed Carry Gun Tools app. This is our app.

00:49:45.001 --> 00:49:47.521
<v Riley Bowman>We came out with the app in 2016?

00:49:49.241 --> 00:49:51.501
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, either 2015 or 2016.

00:49:51.881 --> 00:49:56.801
<v Riley Bowman>Well, we'll just call it. It's the 10-year anniversary of the Concealed Carry

00:49:56.801 --> 00:49:58.401
<v Riley Bowman>Gun Tools app. How about it?

00:49:58.681 --> 00:49:59.681
<v Jacob Paulsen>Absolutely. Why not?

00:50:00.801 --> 00:50:03.201
<v Riley Bowman>This has been through a number of iterations over the years.

00:50:03.341 --> 00:50:05.501
<v Riley Bowman>There's been some challenges over the years.

00:50:05.681 --> 00:50:12.701
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, we know this has been a passion project of ours at concealedcarry.com for a long time.

00:50:12.821 --> 00:50:17.201
<v Riley Bowman>It's been important for us to have this tool available for you,

00:50:17.461 --> 00:50:23.721
<v Riley Bowman>the American gun owner, concealed carriers, to have this tool in the palm of your hands.

00:50:25.201 --> 00:50:28.261
<v Riley Bowman>And recently announced a major update to that.

00:50:28.361 --> 00:50:33.921
<v Riley Bowman>And so we want to point it out and remind you to go to concealedcarry.com forward slash app.

00:50:34.521 --> 00:50:38.621
<v Riley Bowman>Go download the app if you haven't already or if you had it and you're like,

00:50:38.681 --> 00:50:42.741
<v Riley Bowman>you know, delete it. Well, get it back on your phone because there's some valid

00:50:42.741 --> 00:50:44.741
<v Riley Bowman>reasons to have it on and I'll let Jacob tell you why.

00:50:46.226 --> 00:50:49.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, there's some things that have always been true in this app.

00:50:49.206 --> 00:50:52.886
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's other features that have kind of come and gone over time as we've attempted

00:50:52.886 --> 00:50:56.526
<v Jacob Paulsen>to make it something we are capable of maintaining as a business.

00:50:56.746 --> 00:50:59.746
<v Jacob Paulsen>But some things that have always been there and the things that I think are

00:50:59.746 --> 00:51:04.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>probably most used in that app are the Reciprocity Map Builder,

00:51:04.166 --> 00:51:08.386
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Legal Reference Library, so you can pick any state and it'll give you a

00:51:08.386 --> 00:51:11.446
<v Jacob Paulsen>list of all the gun laws in that state that we track as a company.

00:51:11.766 --> 00:51:14.466
<v Jacob Paulsen>We do that for all 50 states plus D.C.,

00:51:15.294 --> 00:51:18.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can also listen to the podcast episodes. You can read every article and

00:51:18.714 --> 00:51:20.334
<v Jacob Paulsen>news posts that we put out.

00:51:20.774 --> 00:51:25.794
<v Jacob Paulsen>And one specific feature that we recently restored in this latest update,

00:51:25.954 --> 00:51:30.154
<v Jacob Paulsen>in addition to some other bug fixes and things like that, is that we put back

00:51:30.154 --> 00:51:32.534
<v Jacob Paulsen>in our store, our online store.

00:51:32.774 --> 00:51:37.974
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, you can't make purchases in the app because we don't want to share your information.

00:51:38.314 --> 00:51:44.754
<v Jacob Paulsen>We don't want Google and Apple to have access to who buys what gun stuff, among other things.

00:51:45.434 --> 00:51:50.914
<v Jacob Paulsen>But you can browse our entire store inside our mobile app, and then you tap

00:51:50.914 --> 00:51:55.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>a button and open up a product in your browser and make a purchase that way if you feel so inclined.

00:51:55.394 --> 00:51:58.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we're trying to make it easier for you to find the gear that you need.

00:51:58.174 --> 00:52:02.334
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's one feature that was in the app once but that had been removed,

00:52:02.334 --> 00:52:07.494
<v Jacob Paulsen>and your guys' request has been put back in in a much more viable way.

00:52:07.734 --> 00:52:10.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's cleaner. It's faster. It's easier to filter by category,

00:52:11.194 --> 00:52:14.934
<v Jacob Paulsen>sort based on things. and the search is also specifically very new.

00:52:15.074 --> 00:52:16.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've never had the search before.

00:52:16.354 --> 00:52:20.734
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so I think the search is really good and important. So you can just open

00:52:20.734 --> 00:52:24.534
<v Jacob Paulsen>the app, tap on shop, type something in the search bar and hit go and you can

00:52:24.534 --> 00:52:26.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>get good results for what you're looking for.

00:52:26.334 --> 00:52:30.594
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yes, just like the entire search tool on our main website,

00:52:30.734 --> 00:52:34.854
<v Riley Bowman>concealedcarry.com has been completely revamped and majorly improved.

00:52:35.254 --> 00:52:42.034
<v Riley Bowman>That search feature in the app with the store is fantastic. If there's something

00:52:42.034 --> 00:52:44.634
<v Riley Bowman>you're looking for, something you need, just type it in.

00:52:44.854 --> 00:52:48.814
<v Riley Bowman>And if we got it, it'll come up in the results and you'll be able to get that,

00:52:48.994 --> 00:52:50.754
<v Riley Bowman>well, on your doorstep very soon.

00:52:51.074 --> 00:52:55.874
<v Riley Bowman>We are doing better than we ever have as far as shipping and fulfilling orders.

00:52:56.694 --> 00:53:01.894
<v Riley Bowman>Very, very timely. And I hope that you'll take advantage of shopping right there

00:53:01.894 --> 00:53:04.874
<v Riley Bowman>in the Concealed Carry Gun Tools app.

00:53:05.614 --> 00:53:10.494
<v Riley Bowman>So download it at concealedcarry.com forward slash app. That'll give you all the information,

00:53:11.397 --> 00:53:15.217
<v Riley Bowman>You can see everything about the app there and then click on your respective

00:53:15.217 --> 00:53:19.517
<v Riley Bowman>link for Google Play or Apple App Store and download the app.

00:53:20.897 --> 00:53:25.157
<v Riley Bowman>All righty, a couple more stories here. Department of Justice sues Colorado.

00:53:25.557 --> 00:53:29.597
<v Riley Bowman>In fact, there's actually two simultaneously taking place lawsuits.

00:53:30.257 --> 00:53:35.777
<v Riley Bowman>One against the state of Colorado on the magazine capacity limit that we have.

00:53:35.777 --> 00:53:40.597
<v Riley Bowman>And the other one is against specifically the city of Denver with respect to

00:53:40.597 --> 00:53:44.997
<v Riley Bowman>their assault weapons ban that they've had for quite a long time,

00:53:45.117 --> 00:53:47.957
<v Riley Bowman>actually a couple, several decades in Denver. They've had that.

00:53:48.297 --> 00:53:51.997
<v Riley Bowman>So Department of Justice, and

00:53:51.997 --> 00:53:58.597
<v Riley Bowman>most of this is being led by Civil Rights Division chief, Harmeet Dillon.

00:53:59.157 --> 00:54:02.077
<v Riley Bowman>She's been doing some excellent work there at the DOJ.

00:54:02.817 --> 00:54:08.617
<v Riley Bowman>I've seen a couple of things put out by her in the last six, seven, eight months.

00:54:09.037 --> 00:54:14.837
<v Riley Bowman>And I'll tell you, she's a little firecracker when it comes to this kind of stuff.

00:54:15.917 --> 00:54:18.977
<v Riley Bowman>And I'm cheering her on and cheering on these lawsuits.

00:54:21.875 --> 00:54:26.315
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, so for some context, and then I think some other relevant information

00:54:26.315 --> 00:54:30.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>here, the Department of Justice signaled that they were going to start looking

00:54:30.615 --> 00:54:33.975
<v Jacob Paulsen>into local laws that are unconstitutional.

00:54:34.875 --> 00:54:40.535
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this Civil Rights Division, I don't know if they've always had a Civil Rights Division.

00:54:40.675 --> 00:54:44.635
<v Jacob Paulsen>If so, I never knew about it until recently because this Dylan,

00:54:44.835 --> 00:54:48.295
<v Jacob Paulsen>she came out and she's like, hey, we're specifically looking at Second Amendment stuff.

00:54:48.435 --> 00:54:51.015
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like we're on this kind of thing. and it's sort of

00:54:51.015 --> 00:54:53.655
<v Jacob Paulsen>like yeah is that all talk is it not and then all of a

00:54:53.655 --> 00:54:56.335
<v Jacob Paulsen>sudden letters get sent to the city of denver and the

00:54:56.335 --> 00:54:59.535
<v Jacob Paulsen>state of colorado saying um these laws are not constitutional and

00:54:59.535 --> 00:55:04.055
<v Jacob Paulsen>we are going to sue you if you don't get them off your books yep and the mayor

00:55:04.055 --> 00:55:09.935
<v Jacob Paulsen>of the city of denver uh he has i think to quote him specifically he said hell

00:55:09.935 --> 00:55:16.515
<v Jacob Paulsen>no so boom lawsuits get filed and we're going to go see how this this rolls

00:55:16.515 --> 00:55:19.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>out some of you might be thinking man i wish they'd do that in my state.

00:55:19.535 --> 00:55:23.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>I wish the DOJ would come to my state and file lawsuits and come after my state

00:55:23.075 --> 00:55:25.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>government from our unconstitutional gun laws.

00:55:25.395 --> 00:55:28.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>And to that, I have a couple of thoughts. One would be, they might be coming.

00:55:29.495 --> 00:55:32.155
<v Jacob Paulsen>So be patient. They have limited capacity.

00:55:32.695 --> 00:55:37.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>And second, I guess my other thought would be that they're going to be strategic

00:55:37.075 --> 00:55:39.495
<v Jacob Paulsen>in terms of where they go fight a fight.

00:55:40.375 --> 00:55:44.675
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's about where we can win. It's about what judges, what courts.

00:55:44.835 --> 00:55:48.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's also going to be about like, is anybody else currently fighting this potentially?

00:55:48.595 --> 00:55:50.415
<v Jacob Paulsen>That might be, I don't know. I don't know what they're thinking.

00:55:50.535 --> 00:55:53.415
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is my arbitrary belief in things that they might be considering,

00:55:53.415 --> 00:55:58.335
<v Jacob Paulsen>but they might be thinking, oh, well, you know, these organizations are already suing Maryland.

00:55:58.855 --> 00:56:03.055
<v Jacob Paulsen>But these books on the, you know, these laws on the books in Colorado have been

00:56:03.055 --> 00:56:04.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>sitting there over a decade unchallenged.

00:56:05.215 --> 00:56:07.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>The state of Colorado law went into effect on 2013.

00:56:08.215 --> 00:56:10.935
<v Jacob Paulsen>So no one's challenged that. Like, let's go after that one.

00:56:11.075 --> 00:56:14.235
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's in a district we think that we got the right judges, and we might be

00:56:14.235 --> 00:56:16.855
<v Jacob Paulsen>able to set a precedent that can be impactful.

00:56:17.495 --> 00:56:20.135
<v Jacob Paulsen>Again, I don't know that they're thinking that, but there's just some considerations

00:56:20.135 --> 00:56:21.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>that I think are relevant.

00:56:22.866 --> 00:56:30.786
<v Riley Bowman>Well, to be fair, the magazine capacity ban or magazine capacity limit law was

00:56:30.786 --> 00:56:34.506
<v Riley Bowman>challenged, but got to the state Supreme Court,

00:56:34.646 --> 00:56:41.426
<v Riley Bowman>and state Supreme Court, which is not 2A friendly at all, was like, nope, sorry.

00:56:42.426 --> 00:56:45.506
<v Riley Bowman>I do think there's been some other challenges filed over the years,

00:56:45.586 --> 00:56:47.346
<v Riley Bowman>but nothing has really materialized from that.

00:56:47.346 --> 00:56:53.986
<v Riley Bowman>But to have the federal government's Department of Justice specifically coming

00:56:53.986 --> 00:57:00.766
<v Riley Bowman>at that is pretty cool to see and signals a strong play from Trump's administration

00:57:00.766 --> 00:57:03.506
<v Riley Bowman>of where they stand on such things.

00:57:03.506 --> 00:57:09.986
<v Riley Bowman>So, yeah, even if, again, to your point, Jacob, if you're not seeing something

00:57:09.986 --> 00:57:13.686
<v Riley Bowman>similar in your respective jurisdiction or state or wherever you are,

00:57:14.686 --> 00:57:18.146
<v Riley Bowman>hey, just know that this sort of thing is a good sign of things to come.

00:57:18.146 --> 00:57:26.286
<v Riley Bowman>And may just be, hey, if this goes the whole way, who knows?

00:57:26.286 --> 00:57:31.826
<v Riley Bowman>Maybe something makes it to the Supreme Court to overturn things on more of

00:57:31.826 --> 00:57:38.766
<v Riley Bowman>a national level that has play for California and New York and Maryland and Virginia now.

00:57:38.946 --> 00:57:46.046
<v Riley Bowman>They're passing their own magazine capacity law and all that, right? Yeah.

00:57:47.676 --> 00:57:53.836
<v Riley Bowman>There you go. A couple more here. NRA files lawsuit challenging the federal post office carry ban.

00:57:54.156 --> 00:57:58.976
<v Riley Bowman>A while back, Jacob, we reported on the ruling out of the Fifth Circuit.

00:57:58.976 --> 00:58:04.096
<v Riley Bowman>It was actually, I think, the North Texas District or something.

00:58:05.776 --> 00:58:09.936
<v Riley Bowman>And, of course, out of that basically came that, hey, no post office.

00:58:10.156 --> 00:58:15.336
<v Riley Bowman>And that was specifically, I think, a challenge by the firearms policy coalition. abolition.

00:58:16.516 --> 00:58:20.616
<v Riley Bowman>And so kind of a thing there is, you know, you got to live in Texas and,

00:58:20.636 --> 00:58:23.396
<v Riley Bowman>and, you know, be a member of FPC or whatever.

00:58:23.536 --> 00:58:25.716
<v Riley Bowman>And I think Second Amendment Foundation may have been a part of that as well

00:58:25.716 --> 00:58:32.116
<v Riley Bowman>to then, you know, be considered or included within that injunction or whatever it was.

00:58:32.236 --> 00:58:40.296
<v Riley Bowman>But now we've got, we got the NRA filing lawsuit challenging this on the federal

00:58:40.296 --> 00:58:42.156
<v Riley Bowman>level. And it's not just NRA.

00:58:42.356 --> 00:58:45.516
<v Riley Bowman>Gun Owners of America also involved. Gun Owners Foundation also involved.

00:58:45.756 --> 00:58:50.196
<v Riley Bowman>And then specifically, you've got three NRA members filing this.

00:58:50.336 --> 00:58:53.836
<v Riley Bowman>And this was filed in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

00:58:55.076 --> 00:59:01.796
<v Riley Bowman>So basically the argument here is that the Bruin ruling is kind of the basis

00:59:01.796 --> 00:59:07.696
<v Riley Bowman>here that post offices in America have existed since 1639.

00:59:08.216 --> 00:59:11.456
<v Riley Bowman>And the carry ban wasn't enacted until 1972.

00:59:12.096 --> 00:59:18.036
<v Riley Bowman>So the idea being that, yeah, there's not a historical precedent for this.

00:59:18.216 --> 00:59:19.636
<v Riley Bowman>So challenging under Bruin.

00:59:20.723 --> 00:59:28.643
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yep. Yeah. It's funny because I just think there's some irony that we

00:59:28.643 --> 00:59:35.683
<v Jacob Paulsen>have the DOJ filing lawsuits against states, you know, who have anti-gun laws.

00:59:35.863 --> 00:59:42.643
<v Jacob Paulsen>But then in order to challenge a federal law that we think is unconstitutional, we have to sue the DOJ.

00:59:44.063 --> 00:59:46.083
<v Riley Bowman>Yes. Touche. Touche.

00:59:47.323 --> 00:59:50.503
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway we'll see how that would that would unfolds this

00:59:50.503 --> 00:59:54.563
<v Jacob Paulsen>is the kind of thing where because it's you know the doj cannot just say yeah

00:59:54.563 --> 00:59:59.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>no you're right we're cool we accept we we lose you you win because we're we're

00:59:59.423 --> 01:00:05.263
<v Jacob Paulsen>we're attacking uh legislation yeah uh u.s code so there's more to it than than

01:00:05.263 --> 01:00:07.983
<v Jacob Paulsen>the doj just saying it's cool you can have this one

01:00:07.983 --> 01:00:10.963
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah apparently there's a challenge also in

01:00:10.963 --> 01:00:14.063
<v Riley Bowman>florida and uh the doj dropped the florida

01:00:14.063 --> 01:00:17.543
<v Riley Bowman>appeal in that case uh now there

01:00:17.543 --> 01:00:22.343
<v Riley Bowman>i've heard the the theory put out there and there's a i forget what the name

01:00:22.343 --> 01:00:27.783
<v Riley Bowman>is that uh mark smith gave this um a four boxes diner but he was explaining

01:00:27.783 --> 01:00:32.663
<v Riley Bowman>he's like you know sometimes people get upset with the doj when they fight against

01:00:32.663 --> 01:00:37.223
<v Riley Bowman>some of these lawsuits uh because you know to your point jacob this kind Kind of this irony of,

01:00:37.343 --> 01:00:40.983
<v Riley Bowman>well, they're suing Denver and Colorado on these Second Amendment issues,

01:00:41.083 --> 01:00:44.903
<v Riley Bowman>but meanwhile are being sued in these other Second Amendment issues and are fighting those cases.

01:00:46.623 --> 01:00:47.543
<v Riley Bowman>And the...

01:00:49.432 --> 01:00:52.032
<v Riley Bowman>Mark Smith talked about this in a video I thought was really well done.

01:00:52.172 --> 01:00:55.792
<v Riley Bowman>That's why I'm referencing him specifically, where he explained the strategy.

01:00:56.032 --> 01:00:59.952
<v Riley Bowman>It goes back actually to the Obama administration where they took a similar

01:00:59.952 --> 01:01:02.712
<v Riley Bowman>approach with a lawsuit.

01:01:03.012 --> 01:01:08.012
<v Riley Bowman>The Obama administration actually agreed with, but if they just kind of like,

01:01:08.292 --> 01:01:13.972
<v Riley Bowman>eh, we're not going to get in your way of this, then it doesn't actually go

01:01:13.972 --> 01:01:21.672
<v Riley Bowman>the whole way of making it to those higher courts to then actually get a really definitive ruling.

01:01:22.012 --> 01:01:27.112
<v Riley Bowman>And so that could be part of the strategy with some of these other cases is

01:01:27.112 --> 01:01:32.112
<v Riley Bowman>that the DOJ has got to push back some so that things fight their way up through

01:01:32.112 --> 01:01:35.112
<v Riley Bowman>the various district courts, federal courts, appeals courts,

01:01:35.312 --> 01:01:39.132
<v Riley Bowman>and all the way up to hopefully the Supreme Court to get something completely

01:01:39.132 --> 01:01:42.092
<v Riley Bowman>on a nationwide level overturned.

01:01:43.032 --> 01:01:47.292
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, otherwise the next administration can walk in and basically do whatever

01:01:47.292 --> 01:01:48.392
<v Jacob Paulsen>they want. Right, exactly.

01:01:48.692 --> 01:01:51.892
<v Jacob Paulsen>If it ended there, then it can change like that.

01:01:52.412 --> 01:01:57.272
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. So I don't know. We'll see how this case out of Pennsylvania goes with

01:01:57.272 --> 01:02:00.992
<v Riley Bowman>respect to overturning the federal post office carry ban.

01:02:02.548 --> 01:02:07.108
<v Riley Bowman>Now, more news out of Maryland. I referenced this towards the beginning of the

01:02:07.108 --> 01:02:09.508
<v Riley Bowman>episode, referencing sensitive places.

01:02:09.808 --> 01:02:15.508
<v Riley Bowman>But a cert petition was filed in Kipke versus Moore asking the Supreme Court

01:02:15.508 --> 01:02:20.288
<v Riley Bowman>of the United States to review Maryland's post-Bruin sensitive places law.

01:02:21.448 --> 01:02:24.048
<v Riley Bowman>So Maryland, they've restricted carry in places like state parks,

01:02:24.208 --> 01:02:28.948
<v Riley Bowman>government buildings, museums, transit, public transit, health care facilities,

01:02:29.168 --> 01:02:34.348
<v Riley Bowman>schools, stadiums, casinos, alcohol serving locations. and within 1,000 feet

01:02:34.348 --> 01:02:35.728
<v Riley Bowman>of any public demonstration.

01:02:36.588 --> 01:02:41.288
<v Riley Bowman>And so the petition argues that lower courts are systematically using sensitive

01:02:41.288 --> 01:02:48.028
<v Riley Bowman>places, those carve-outs, to gut Bruin's core holding.

01:02:49.248 --> 01:02:55.768
<v Riley Bowman>So essentially arguing that, okay, well, we have Bruin, but if you strip away

01:02:55.768 --> 01:02:58.828
<v Riley Bowman>all of these publicly accessible venues and...

01:03:00.136 --> 01:03:03.136
<v Riley Bowman>And keep people from being able to carry in those, then what's the point, right?

01:03:03.776 --> 01:03:09.416
<v Riley Bowman>So challenging these laws, these sensitive places laws in the wake of Bruin

01:03:09.416 --> 01:03:13.256
<v Riley Bowman>and seeing if, you know, we can get some of this, get a little bit more.

01:03:13.256 --> 01:03:18.096
<v Riley Bowman>Or because I don't know, Jacob, if I ever see a world where we,

01:03:18.316 --> 01:03:20.956
<v Riley Bowman>you know, like where there's no restrictions,

01:03:21.276 --> 01:03:23.596
<v Riley Bowman>like I think there's always going to be some amount of, like,

01:03:23.776 --> 01:03:27.376
<v Riley Bowman>I think we're always going to probably have government buildings,

01:03:27.516 --> 01:03:33.156
<v Riley Bowman>for instance, that exist that are off limits to carrying a gun. Okay.

01:03:33.816 --> 01:03:36.636
<v Riley Bowman>Unless you're, you know, law enforcement or whatever. Right.

01:03:36.736 --> 01:03:39.776
<v Riley Bowman>Like airports are probably always going to be off limits. Well,

01:03:39.836 --> 01:03:41.456
<v Riley Bowman>maybe not necessarily the airports themselves, but you know,

01:03:41.496 --> 01:03:45.596
<v Riley Bowman>I mean like secure areas within the airport and planes and so forth are probably

01:03:45.596 --> 01:03:50.296
<v Riley Bowman>always going to be off limits to having a carrying a gun with you onto that plane. Right.

01:03:50.956 --> 01:03:54.796
<v Riley Bowman>And so, but I think this is more about, okay, where are the limits?

01:03:54.936 --> 01:03:57.816
<v Riley Bowman>Where do we draw the line? And can we establish some reasonable ones?

01:03:57.976 --> 01:04:01.956
<v Riley Bowman>Because currently Maryland and New York and California and Hawaii and these

01:04:01.956 --> 01:04:04.736
<v Riley Bowman>places are trying to create these sensitive places. And we're seeing that a

01:04:04.736 --> 01:04:08.196
<v Riley Bowman>little bit, even to some extent here in Colorado, we've definitely seen more

01:04:08.196 --> 01:04:10.636
<v Riley Bowman>restrictions in recent years than what we had in the past.

01:04:11.276 --> 01:04:13.176
<v Riley Bowman>And so, you know, where do we draw the lines?

01:04:14.485 --> 01:04:17.585
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that's really well said. I don't know that I'd add much to that, right?

01:04:17.885 --> 01:04:21.965
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, this Maryland lawsuit is a second lawsuit. The first lawsuit already

01:04:21.965 --> 01:04:26.525
<v Jacob Paulsen>established that some of the sensitive places that were lined up in that legislation

01:04:26.525 --> 01:04:27.745
<v Jacob Paulsen>were not constitutional.

01:04:28.085 --> 01:04:31.205
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so those were, you know, killed.

01:04:31.585 --> 01:04:36.525
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the petitioners are basically saying, we're not satisfied with that ruling.

01:04:36.725 --> 01:04:41.385
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, we think more of these sensitive places are unconstitutional than what

01:04:41.385 --> 01:04:42.625
<v Jacob Paulsen>the previous court decided.

01:04:43.105 --> 01:04:46.485
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, you know, continuing to escalate that is a good thing.

01:04:46.805 --> 01:04:50.025
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. We've seen some similar things in New York where it was,

01:04:50.185 --> 01:04:53.925
<v Riley Bowman>you know, like they want to put everything on this list of all these different

01:04:53.925 --> 01:04:56.325
<v Riley Bowman>places. And I think you've seen something similar in Hawaii.

01:04:56.645 --> 01:05:00.685
<v Riley Bowman>And so then those governments, those state-level governments especially,

01:05:00.725 --> 01:05:02.765
<v Riley Bowman>are kind of like, okay, we'll pull back a little bit.

01:05:02.845 --> 01:05:08.945
<v Riley Bowman>But they're going to be constantly pushing that threshold, so to speak, you know, where that is.

01:05:09.965 --> 01:05:13.205
<v Riley Bowman>So, I don't know. We'll see where this challenge goes. yeah,

01:05:14.105 --> 01:05:18.105
<v Riley Bowman>finally well okay we do have a bit of good news here at the end I'm going to

01:05:18.105 --> 01:05:21.605
<v Riley Bowman>cover this real quick Jacob out of Minnesota all right because this is super

01:05:21.605 --> 01:05:28.605
<v Riley Bowman>fast the legislature adjourned and every single gun control bill was defeated and that is big news.

01:05:30.563 --> 01:05:32.543
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and there were a lot of nasties.

01:05:32.723 --> 01:05:34.123
<v Riley Bowman>There were a lot of nasties in Minnesota.

01:05:34.283 --> 01:05:38.003
<v Jacob Paulsen>We kind of had Virginia and Minnesota as opposite outcomes this year.

01:05:38.323 --> 01:05:44.563
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah, very, very good point. Virginia is like, go on.

01:05:45.023 --> 01:05:45.763
<v Jacob Paulsen>Pass them all.

01:05:46.003 --> 01:05:50.883
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, going hard in the paint on anti-2A legislation.

01:05:51.163 --> 01:05:54.923
<v Riley Bowman>Minnesota was trying, but ultimately, and by the way, there were some people

01:05:54.923 --> 01:05:56.643
<v Riley Bowman>doing some good work on the ground there.

01:05:57.203 --> 01:06:01.143
<v Riley Bowman>Minnesota, what is it? Minnesota gun owners or Minnesota? yeah, I think it's Minnesota.

01:06:01.363 --> 01:06:05.983
<v Riley Bowman>Anyway, some, some pro two way organizations in Minnesota really working it hard there.

01:06:06.143 --> 01:06:10.863
<v Riley Bowman>I know I saw some stuff from like John and Sarah Hauptman from Philster involved

01:06:10.863 --> 01:06:14.663
<v Riley Bowman>in some of those efforts and some other friends also that really,

01:06:14.803 --> 01:06:16.683
<v Riley Bowman>you know, we're, we're getting fired up about that.

01:06:17.083 --> 01:06:20.443
<v Riley Bowman>Ultimately all those bills were defeated.

01:06:20.843 --> 01:06:25.723
<v Riley Bowman>And so that was really good news, but I wanted to share that. Oh, go ahead, Jacob.

01:06:25.723 --> 01:06:29.383
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was going to say, Minnesota is a very interesting state, politically speaking.

01:06:30.343 --> 01:06:35.123
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's a very just bizarre kind of place in some respects.

01:06:35.323 --> 01:06:39.183
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it was definitely just – I didn't have a sense for how it was going to

01:06:39.183 --> 01:06:41.463
<v Jacob Paulsen>go. And so I'm very thrilled.

01:06:41.963 --> 01:06:46.703
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. Likewise. And it's good to have a bit of good news amongst all of

01:06:46.703 --> 01:06:48.383
<v Riley Bowman>the not-so-good news we just covered.

01:06:49.823 --> 01:06:54.983
<v Riley Bowman>To close this up and bid everyone adieu, I wanted to end here.

01:06:54.983 --> 01:06:57.323
<v Riley Bowman>It basically points you all to an article.

01:06:57.503 --> 01:07:01.043
<v Riley Bowman>It should be in the show notes. That includes even on Facebook and YouTube.

01:07:01.323 --> 01:07:03.763
<v Riley Bowman>It should be linked in the description of these videos.

01:07:05.183 --> 01:07:10.823
<v Riley Bowman>But this was a really interesting article published on StephenHalbrook.com.

01:07:11.003 --> 01:07:16.483
<v Riley Bowman>The title of it is, How a Fake Citation Misled Courts to Uphold Sensitive Place Gun Bans.

01:07:17.592 --> 01:07:23.772
<v Riley Bowman>And basically, at the core of this article, he's talking about how sloppy. Okay, so let me back up.

01:07:24.212 --> 01:07:26.992
<v Riley Bowman>Everyone knows now we're in a world of AI, right?

01:07:27.792 --> 01:07:32.192
<v Riley Bowman>Heck, Jacob and I are even users, consumers of AI technology.

01:07:32.192 --> 01:07:36.212
<v Riley Bowman>And it's been beneficial to us personally and also in our business.

01:07:37.052 --> 01:07:41.252
<v Riley Bowman>And I won't go into specifics on that. But just know, like, and I think that

01:07:41.252 --> 01:07:45.692
<v Riley Bowman>there is a place in our world where responsible use of AI is a good thing.

01:07:45.692 --> 01:07:47.992
<v Riley Bowman>Like can make our world a better place.

01:07:48.452 --> 01:07:51.312
<v Riley Bowman>I think that's true of just about any technological advance.

01:07:51.532 --> 01:07:57.512
<v Riley Bowman>Like there's new technology all the time and that technology can be used as

01:07:57.512 --> 01:08:01.672
<v Riley Bowman>a benefit to humanity and it can also be taken too far or used in the wrong

01:08:01.672 --> 01:08:03.932
<v Riley Bowman>way and can be a detriment as well, right?

01:08:04.272 --> 01:08:11.312
<v Riley Bowman>And so, but basically what's going on here, Stephen Halbrook's point is what

01:08:11.312 --> 01:08:15.232
<v Riley Bowman>we're actually seeing is you have courts.

01:08:15.232 --> 01:08:18.172
<v Riley Bowman>And we're talking about at every level,

01:08:18.192 --> 01:08:23.932
<v Riley Bowman>but especially at the federal level where courts and attorneys and judges and

01:08:23.932 --> 01:08:26.532
<v Riley Bowman>law clerks that are doing all

01:08:26.532 --> 01:08:31.292
<v Riley Bowman>the work behind the scenes to research stuff are using AI to help in that.

01:08:31.412 --> 01:08:34.632
<v Riley Bowman>And AI can be hugely beneficial to take a ton of information,

01:08:34.892 --> 01:08:38.372
<v Riley Bowman>condense it, analyze it, summarize it, help make sense of it.

01:08:38.432 --> 01:08:40.092
<v Riley Bowman>And that could be a good thing, right?

01:08:40.572 --> 01:08:45.432
<v Riley Bowman>But the problem is, is you always have to vet the quality of the work that the

01:08:45.432 --> 01:08:47.292
<v Riley Bowman>artificial intelligence does.

01:08:48.012 --> 01:08:52.252
<v Riley Bowman>You need to vet the sources that it uses or the claims that it uses and so on and so forth.

01:08:52.352 --> 01:08:56.272
<v Riley Bowman>Like you basically have to double check its work. And so,

01:08:56.452 --> 01:09:01.212
<v Riley Bowman>but what's happening is we're seeing in actual courts,

01:09:01.232 --> 01:09:11.452
<v Riley Bowman>in cases where AI is being used and is getting things wrong and is then being used in rulings.

01:09:13.757 --> 01:09:19.477
<v Riley Bowman>That is not maybe going in our favor on certain, particularly Second Amendment

01:09:19.477 --> 01:09:23.497
<v Riley Bowman>issues. And he specifically calls out instances where, you know,

01:09:23.637 --> 01:09:26.657
<v Riley Bowman>you have the Bruin case, right?

01:09:26.957 --> 01:09:32.737
<v Riley Bowman>This Bruin, this historical standard that was created through Bruin,

01:09:32.817 --> 01:09:37.537
<v Riley Bowman>which means that for so many of these cases, these attorneys,

01:09:37.797 --> 01:09:41.957
<v Riley Bowman>these clerks, these judges have to go and do historical research to see,

01:09:41.957 --> 01:09:46.557
<v Riley Bowman>is there a precedent for this historically or not? Where did this start?

01:09:46.757 --> 01:09:49.357
<v Riley Bowman>Historically, whatever issue it is, they're researching.

01:09:49.977 --> 01:09:55.117
<v Riley Bowman>And AI can help with that. But if AI gets it wrong, then you can see where the

01:09:55.117 --> 01:09:58.257
<v Riley Bowman>negative implications could come in, right? Right.

01:09:58.597 --> 01:10:07.437
<v Riley Bowman>And so specifically, there's this Antoniuk, I guess is how you say it, case.

01:10:08.057 --> 01:10:16.697
<v Riley Bowman>And it referenced founding era North Carolina and Virginia laws where there were carry bans.

01:10:17.817 --> 01:10:22.817
<v Riley Bowman>And Halbrook's like, well, that's kind of true, but also there's more context

01:10:22.817 --> 01:10:27.837
<v Riley Bowman>and nuance to those laws that were passed way back.

01:10:28.317 --> 01:10:32.017
<v Riley Bowman>And he says the way those laws were written were to target armed,

01:10:32.237 --> 01:10:38.077
<v Riley Bowman>they were supposed to target those that were armed to the, quote, terror of the people.

01:10:38.317 --> 01:10:48.837
<v Riley Bowman>And he's saying that's a much narrower standard than how it's being used in some of these cases.

01:10:49.357 --> 01:10:54.277
<v Riley Bowman>And so, anyway, I don't want to, you know, we're actually over time with respect

01:10:54.277 --> 01:10:56.957
<v Riley Bowman>to the length of the episode here today. But I wanted to kind of give you a

01:10:56.957 --> 01:11:00.277
<v Riley Bowman>little bit of a taste and point you to that article and say,

01:11:00.357 --> 01:11:01.497
<v Riley Bowman>go read that. It's interesting.

01:11:01.717 --> 01:11:05.597
<v Riley Bowman>And it's also deeply concerning and something we probably ought to be raising

01:11:05.597 --> 01:11:08.237
<v Riley Bowman>attention to a little bit more. But Jacob, any thoughts on that?

01:11:10.543 --> 01:11:15.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't work in the legal profession. You know, I'm not a clerk of a court.

01:11:15.523 --> 01:11:16.903
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm not a judge. I'm not an attorney.

01:11:17.083 --> 01:11:19.483
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm not, you know, part of some bar association.

01:11:20.883 --> 01:11:25.383
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yeah, I guess the best I could do is just say that regardless of what profession you're in,

01:11:26.003 --> 01:11:28.043
<v Jacob Paulsen>whether you run a website to sell

01:11:28.043 --> 01:11:34.863
<v Jacob Paulsen>some gun stuff or you're a judge or an attorney or whatever it is you do,

01:11:34.863 --> 01:11:37.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>like you need to be cautious with

01:11:37.723 --> 01:11:41.103
<v Jacob Paulsen>the use of ai and you need to vet sources you

01:11:41.103 --> 01:11:44.863
<v Jacob Paulsen>know you need to really do your research and understand um what

01:11:44.863 --> 01:11:47.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>what's being output uh because if not

01:11:47.723 --> 01:11:51.463
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know it's going to smack you in the face and i think that that's what we're

01:11:51.463 --> 01:11:56.043
<v Jacob Paulsen>seeing here like if you're a judge in a court like it's your job to determine

01:11:56.043 --> 01:12:00.343
<v Jacob Paulsen>the truth of things and so you have to vet this stuff you got to do your research

01:12:00.343 --> 01:12:04.943
<v Jacob Paulsen>and looking at some law that was written in north carolina in the 1500s,

01:12:05.363 --> 01:12:11.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>hundreds of years before the Second Amendment became, you know, an amendment to the U.S.

01:12:12.043 --> 01:12:16.383
<v Jacob Paulsen>Constitution, and not understanding the context in which that was written and

01:12:16.383 --> 01:12:21.623
<v Jacob Paulsen>whether or not it continued past the Second Amendment is just outright malfeasance

01:12:21.623 --> 01:12:23.703
<v Jacob Paulsen>in terms of jurisprudence.

01:12:24.123 --> 01:12:25.703
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yeah, get it right.

01:12:26.403 --> 01:12:26.783
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah.

01:12:28.395 --> 01:12:31.435
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, these are the kind of issues we're dealing with in today's world.

01:12:31.435 --> 01:12:33.995
<v Riley Bowman>And we've covered a lot of other very important issues in today's episode.

01:12:34.115 --> 01:12:37.275
<v Riley Bowman>I hope if you enjoyed this episode, if you're not already,

01:12:37.575 --> 01:12:43.235
<v Riley Bowman>like and subscribe to the podcast, to our YouTube channel, to our other social

01:12:43.235 --> 01:12:48.935
<v Riley Bowman>media channels, and that you would share the podcast with those in your life

01:12:48.935 --> 01:12:51.395
<v Riley Bowman>that you think should also hear and be aware of these issues.

01:12:51.575 --> 01:12:56.735
<v Riley Bowman>We try to cover legislative and other industry news once a month on the podcast.

01:12:56.735 --> 01:12:57.955
<v Riley Bowman>It doesn't always happen.

01:12:58.455 --> 01:13:01.295
<v Riley Bowman>But we're glad to be able to be here with you today doing this.

01:13:02.175 --> 01:13:05.235
<v Riley Bowman>I think the next episode we do will be a Justified Saves episode.

01:13:05.375 --> 01:13:08.975
<v Riley Bowman>It'll be time for that. And we know that people really appreciate those stories

01:13:08.975 --> 01:13:09.975
<v Riley Bowman>and those lessons learned.

01:13:10.375 --> 01:13:15.075
<v Riley Bowman>And we'll continue to try to bring other very important and relevant information

01:13:15.075 --> 01:13:21.255
<v Riley Bowman>and education and best practices to you guys in the world of concealed carry and personal defense.

01:13:21.775 --> 01:13:24.175
<v Riley Bowman>But thank you for being here with us today.

01:13:24.875 --> 01:13:31.555
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder of today's episode sponsors, EDC Belt Company, Foundation Belt. Go to edcbeltco.com.

01:13:31.795 --> 01:13:37.055
<v Riley Bowman>Hope that you'll order one today. And also the Concealed Carry Gun Tools app

01:13:37.055 --> 01:13:41.995
<v Riley Bowman>that we talked about a little bit ago, which you can check out at concealedcarry.com forward slash app.

01:13:42.815 --> 01:13:48.935
<v Riley Bowman>And thank you to your support of our sponsors that make doing everything we

01:13:48.935 --> 01:13:50.495
<v Riley Bowman>do here honestly possible.

01:13:50.715 --> 01:13:53.375
<v Riley Bowman>It wouldn't be possible without your support, without your business.

01:13:54.855 --> 01:13:59.615
<v Riley Bowman>Without liking, sharing, subscribing, buying, and all those things that help

01:13:59.615 --> 01:14:01.035
<v Riley Bowman>us stay in business, stay afloat.

01:14:01.415 --> 01:14:05.815
<v Riley Bowman>So thank you, everyone. Jacob, thank you for your time today and for another episode.

01:14:06.455 --> 01:14:07.215
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep, game on.

01:14:08.824 --> 01:14:12.824
<v Riley Bowman>So we'll wrap this one up and bid you adieu. Have a great weekend.

01:14:13.724 --> 01:14:17.824
<v Riley Bowman>And yeah, about to enter the month of June, which is kind of an exciting thing,

01:14:17.924 --> 01:14:22.144
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob, because so what happens at the end of June? July.

01:14:22.824 --> 01:14:26.084
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, it's true. Good job, Riley.

01:14:26.164 --> 01:14:32.304
<v Riley Bowman>At the beginning of July, we get to celebrate essentially the 250th birthday of our nation.

01:14:32.564 --> 01:14:36.824
<v Jacob Paulsen>That was a stretch of why we should celebrate June, but you're not wrong.

01:14:37.564 --> 01:14:40.764
<v Riley Bowman>I'm excited. I'm excited that that's fast approaching.

01:14:41.104 --> 01:14:42.284
<v Riley Bowman>So I think we should probably do something

01:14:42.284 --> 01:14:47.524
<v Riley Bowman>special for the podcast for the celebration of our nation's birth.

01:14:47.964 --> 01:14:48.684
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, we should.

01:14:49.004 --> 01:14:51.804
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, guys, until next time, a reminder to train right,

01:14:51.944 --> 01:14:55.224
<v Riley Bowman>train often, and train safe so you can. Your turn.

01:14:55.924 --> 01:14:58.184
<v Jacob Paulsen>Fight hard, fight fast, and fight true.

01:14:58.664 --> 01:14:59.844
<v Riley Bowman>Take care. See you, everybody.

01:15:13.488 --> 01:15:15.748
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder that laws vary from place to place, and we encourage listeners to

01:15:15.748 --> 01:15:17.688
<v Riley Bowman>seek local legal advice to understand applicable laws.

01:15:18.028 --> 01:15:20.148
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, Inc., its brands and properties, and the Concealed Carry podcast

01:15:20.148 --> 01:15:21.888
<v Riley Bowman>is not a legal service, nor are we attorneys at law.

01:15:22.068 --> 01:15:24.388
<v Riley Bowman>We make our best faith effort to share Concealed Carry-related insights and

01:15:24.388 --> 01:15:26.508
<v Riley Bowman>information about firearm-related incidents and the laws pertaining,

01:15:26.708 --> 01:15:28.008
<v Riley Bowman>based on our own understanding and experience.

01:15:28.208 --> 01:15:30.528
<v Riley Bowman>But things can be different where you live, or laws may have changed by the

01:15:30.528 --> 01:15:33.008
<v Riley Bowman>time you listen to this. We cannot be held liable for your actions based on

01:15:33.008 --> 01:15:34.068
<v Riley Bowman>the information shared in this podcast.

01:15:34.408 --> 01:15:36.408
<v Riley Bowman>Please exercise care with all things pertaining to firearm use,

01:15:36.588 --> 01:15:39.008
<v Riley Bowman>concealed carry, and always practice following basic firearm safety rules.

01:15:39.288 --> 01:15:42.388
<v Riley Bowman>More information about safety can be found at concealedcarry.com forward slash safety.

