WEBVTT

00:00:15.459 --> 00:00:16.719
<v Riley Bowman>And welcome to the Concealed Carry

00:00:16.719 --> 00:00:21.319
<v Riley Bowman>Podcast, part of the ConcealedCarry.com network, brought to you by HK.

00:00:22.299 --> 00:00:27.859
<v Riley Bowman>Today is Friday, April 10th, 2026, as of the recording of this episode.

00:00:29.017 --> 00:00:33.637
<v Riley Bowman>I am your host, Riley Bowman, and I'm joined today by this gentleman right here to my right.

00:00:34.097 --> 00:00:35.717
<v Jacob Paulsen>Co-host, Jacob Paulson.

00:00:36.017 --> 00:00:41.077
<v Riley Bowman>That dude. Yeah. That guy. Hey, by the way, folks, those of you joining us live,

00:00:41.277 --> 00:00:45.657
<v Riley Bowman>I appreciate you being here with us because today, and those of you who are

00:00:45.657 --> 00:00:49.417
<v Riley Bowman>not joining live, you'll probably recall this, but today,

00:00:49.737 --> 00:00:54.757
<v Riley Bowman>the Artemis II mission, the Orion capsule,

00:00:55.517 --> 00:01:00.257
<v Riley Bowman>lands in the ocean in like, I don't know, know an hour or two so that's kind of cool.

00:01:00.257 --> 00:01:03.477
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah that sounds cool jake

00:01:03.477 --> 00:01:04.497
<v Riley Bowman>Is like i had no idea.

00:01:04.497 --> 00:01:10.597
<v Jacob Paulsen>Didn't know didn't care i'm just being transparent here i can only have bandwidth

00:01:10.597 --> 00:01:14.757
<v Jacob Paulsen>for limited things and that we we sent some people up to replicate what was

00:01:14.757 --> 00:01:22.097
<v Jacob Paulsen>done 50 years ago i just did it's not capturing my imagination i'm sorry i

00:01:22.097 --> 00:01:27.777
<v Riley Bowman>Well i mean i i think it's interesting i think it's of note I think it's a bit

00:01:27.777 --> 00:01:30.377
<v Riley Bowman>of interesting good news of sorts.

00:01:30.577 --> 00:01:34.077
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, some people could debate how beneficial or whatever it is.

00:01:34.177 --> 00:01:41.397
<v Riley Bowman>But I think it's good news in a day when there's a lot of not so good news. So I think it's cool.

00:01:41.577 --> 00:01:44.617
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's good that these gentlemen are still alive. Yeah. It's good.

00:01:44.897 --> 00:01:48.897
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think I'd rather actually see my tax dollars spent on colonizing the moon

00:01:48.897 --> 00:01:53.197
<v Jacob Paulsen>than most other things my tax dollars are spent on. So there's that.

00:01:55.797 --> 00:01:58.057
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah so sorry sorry.

00:01:58.057 --> 00:01:59.737
<v Jacob Paulsen>For any negativity that was not my

00:01:59.737 --> 00:02:04.517
<v Riley Bowman>Intent no i mean it's just like whatever i i think it's cool so hey we sent

00:02:04.517 --> 00:02:10.157
<v Riley Bowman>dudes and one dudette around the uh the moon uh for the first time like you said you know what.

00:02:10.157 --> 00:02:14.017
<v Jacob Paulsen>When nasa starts buying ksg holsters and barrel blocks i'll care a lot

00:02:14.017 --> 00:02:19.437
<v Riley Bowman>Well we might need to make something to fit a space blaster.

00:02:20.537 --> 00:02:22.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's no Space Blasters yet, right?

00:02:22.177 --> 00:02:23.717
<v Riley Bowman>We don't know that for sure.

00:02:24.477 --> 00:02:27.157
<v Jacob Paulsen>Jeez. How do you dry fire a Space Blaster?

00:02:27.397 --> 00:02:30.257
<v Riley Bowman>There's a dry fire mode. Just switch, man. Just like, you know.

00:02:30.997 --> 00:02:35.117
<v Riley Bowman>Anyway. Okay. Well, anyway, thanks for being with us because I know probably

00:02:35.117 --> 00:02:39.677
<v Riley Bowman>a number of people might be distracted by other, you know, video feeds and TV

00:02:39.677 --> 00:02:43.897
<v Riley Bowman>episodes or whatever going on that's covering that. So thanks for being with us.

00:02:44.517 --> 00:02:46.717
<v Riley Bowman>Today, we're getting into Stand Your Ground.

00:02:48.137 --> 00:02:51.037
<v Riley Bowman>Several, several, several hundred episodes ago.

00:02:51.297 --> 00:02:56.977
<v Riley Bowman>One of the earlier episodes we ever did was about this specific topic.

00:02:57.177 --> 00:03:00.277
<v Riley Bowman>It was just called, I think, Stand Your Ground or something to that effect.

00:03:01.297 --> 00:03:05.097
<v Riley Bowman>And we're revisiting that today. Now, we talk about Stand Your Ground issues

00:03:05.097 --> 00:03:11.317
<v Riley Bowman>all the time, you know, in passing, if you will, or as part of an analysis of

00:03:11.317 --> 00:03:14.237
<v Riley Bowman>Justified Save stories, right?

00:03:14.237 --> 00:03:17.057
<v Riley Bowman>Sure, I suppose. Like that comes up regularly on the podcast.

00:03:17.317 --> 00:03:21.337
<v Riley Bowman>And so for three years, I mean, that's kind of our regular opportunity to,

00:03:21.597 --> 00:03:25.457
<v Riley Bowman>hey, you know, in this story out of Kentucky, this gentleman,

00:03:25.497 --> 00:03:28.657
<v Riley Bowman>you know, didn't abide by, you know.

00:03:28.897 --> 00:03:32.497
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I mean, it comes up less than other self-defense legal doctrines.

00:03:32.677 --> 00:03:38.357
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sure. In my opinion. Like, despite being kind of one of the more spoken to or

00:03:38.357 --> 00:03:45.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>about, has the most cool, like, sayings and cliche terms, but it's less applicable.

00:03:46.383 --> 00:03:48.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>Generally speaking, than other self-defense.

00:03:48.803 --> 00:03:52.703
<v Riley Bowman>Right, because it doesn't come into play as often as what you might think.

00:03:53.663 --> 00:03:59.003
<v Riley Bowman>But yet, here's the converse of that, kind of sort of an interesting contrast to what you just said,

00:03:59.003 --> 00:04:05.063
<v Riley Bowman>is that one of the most common comments I see on our social media posts about

00:04:05.063 --> 00:04:09.603
<v Riley Bowman>some defensive shooting somewhere or whatever is,

00:04:09.783 --> 00:04:10.963
<v Riley Bowman>Stand your ground!

00:04:11.263 --> 00:04:14.943
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, no, it's a misunderstood thing, right? That's why this topic is important,

00:04:14.983 --> 00:04:16.983
<v Jacob Paulsen>even if it's not applied as often as we think.

00:04:17.303 --> 00:04:21.683
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because people don't understand. I think in general, American gun owners and

00:04:21.683 --> 00:04:22.783
<v Jacob Paulsen>concealed carriers don't understand it.

00:04:23.463 --> 00:04:30.943
<v Jacob Paulsen>They misapply it. We've seen some countless number of news stories misuse the

00:04:30.943 --> 00:04:33.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>Stand Your Ground legal doctrine or concept.

00:04:33.763 --> 00:04:40.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've seen judges misuse it in trials and then have those decisions be overturned because of it.

00:04:41.383 --> 00:04:45.083
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yeah, it is definitely a screwed up thing.

00:04:45.283 --> 00:04:45.703
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:04:46.383 --> 00:04:47.383
<v Jacob Paulsen>Commonly messed up.

00:04:47.383 --> 00:04:51.563
<v Riley Bowman>Well, that's the point of today's episode is to help our listeners and viewers

00:04:51.563 --> 00:04:55.683
<v Riley Bowman>understand what Stand Your Ground actually is a bit better.

00:04:55.883 --> 00:05:00.463
<v Riley Bowman>So we're taking this opportunity to go back since the original Stand Your Ground

00:05:00.463 --> 00:05:05.983
<v Riley Bowman>episode that we did has fallen off the current podcast feed quite some time ago.

00:05:06.883 --> 00:05:11.323
<v Riley Bowman>We're taking this opportunity to revisit that in depth, talk about what it is,

00:05:11.403 --> 00:05:16.703
<v Riley Bowman>what it means, and give you some also examples of what it is, what it isn't.

00:05:16.703 --> 00:05:22.443
<v Riley Bowman>And when it has worked or when people have abided by the principles of Stand

00:05:22.443 --> 00:05:25.963
<v Riley Bowman>Your Ground versus not and the trouble that can lead to.

00:05:26.103 --> 00:05:31.123
<v Riley Bowman>And there's one particular case that is not that old of a case either that I

00:05:31.123 --> 00:05:34.103
<v Riley Bowman>think is probably worth getting into today.

00:05:34.103 --> 00:05:38.523
<v Riley Bowman>I think it's one of the better examples of this because it was plastered all

00:05:38.523 --> 00:05:42.543
<v Riley Bowman>around social media and the mainstream news cycle about Stand Your Ground,

00:05:42.623 --> 00:05:43.743
<v Riley Bowman>Stand Your Ground, Stand Your Ground.

00:05:43.923 --> 00:05:47.303
<v Riley Bowman>And, well, we'll get into that. So that's going to be your little tease.

00:05:47.563 --> 00:05:50.223
<v Riley Bowman>You got to stick around and see what it is exactly, what story we're going to

00:05:50.223 --> 00:05:51.763
<v Riley Bowman>talk about to cover that.

00:05:52.183 --> 00:05:55.583
<v Riley Bowman>Today's episode, though, is sponsored, brought to you by Guardian Nation.

00:05:56.573 --> 00:05:59.713
<v Riley Bowman>So guardian nation is uh well one of

00:05:59.713 --> 00:06:05.093
<v Riley Bowman>the best communities out there period for like-minded folks such as yourselves

00:06:05.093 --> 00:06:10.753
<v Riley Bowman>that want to know and understand and train and learn about self-defense and

00:06:10.753 --> 00:06:17.933
<v Riley Bowman>shooting and the law and all these kinds of things because well besides of our our annual,

00:06:18.653 --> 00:06:22.313
<v Riley Bowman>guardian conference that we put on in september we also

00:06:22.313 --> 00:06:25.313
<v Riley Bowman>have a lot of video content in the

00:06:25.313 --> 00:06:28.753
<v Riley Bowman>guardian University Library that Guardian

00:06:28.753 --> 00:06:33.633
<v Riley Bowman>Nation members get full and complete access to that this is where you're going

00:06:33.633 --> 00:06:37.633
<v Riley Bowman>to get a lot of that content in addition to the podcast and stuff but like one

00:06:37.633 --> 00:06:42.353
<v Riley Bowman>really great and this is it's the first thing we ever filmed as a video course

00:06:42.353 --> 00:06:45.553
<v Riley Bowman>and it's you know a decade old now at this point.

00:06:46.221 --> 00:06:52.201
<v Riley Bowman>But it's still good content. And I think we do a great job with the attorney,

00:06:52.441 --> 00:06:55.141
<v Riley Bowman>Doug Richards, in there talking about Stand Your Ground.

00:06:55.381 --> 00:06:58.921
<v Riley Bowman>And that is the American Gun Law video course.

00:06:59.501 --> 00:07:03.421
<v Riley Bowman>So that's in the Guardian University Library.

00:07:03.801 --> 00:07:04.001
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes.

00:07:04.501 --> 00:07:07.921
<v Riley Bowman>So that's one thing that you could go and review if you haven't done that before.

00:07:08.421 --> 00:07:11.601
<v Riley Bowman>Of course, you can buy all of our video courses a la carte. But the best thing

00:07:11.601 --> 00:07:13.101
<v Riley Bowman>is to just join Guardian Nation.

00:07:13.621 --> 00:07:17.921
<v Riley Bowman>So you get full access to all the training content, our live events like Guardian

00:07:17.921 --> 00:07:23.801
<v Riley Bowman>Conference and access to our community of serious, like-minded self-defenders

00:07:24.201 --> 00:07:27.681
<v Riley Bowman>all throughout, you could say the world, but mostly obviously in the U.S.

00:07:27.761 --> 00:07:30.801
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, yeah. I don't even know if you can join if you're not in the U.S.

00:07:30.821 --> 00:07:31.441
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, it doesn't matter.

00:07:32.221 --> 00:07:36.701
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was just going to add that recently I've added a lot of new videos to the members of the area.

00:07:36.881 --> 00:07:38.781
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you're listening to this and you are a Guardian issue member,

00:07:39.001 --> 00:07:42.701
<v Jacob Paulsen>you might want to go log in and you click on Guardian University or in the main

00:07:42.701 --> 00:07:45.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>menu, You can just click on, it says like read, watch, listen.

00:07:45.821 --> 00:07:47.701
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can click on watch and then all videos.

00:07:47.921 --> 00:07:51.901
<v Jacob Paulsen>And there's a kind of a carousel there of just member-only videos.

00:07:52.241 --> 00:07:55.521
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's probably the fastest way to get to that content. But some really,

00:07:55.581 --> 00:08:02.141
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, 8 to 15-minute length training videos from recent events and conferences from last year.

00:08:02.321 --> 00:08:04.641
<v Jacob Paulsen>And there's one in there I uploaded recently from Daryl Bulkey,

00:08:04.801 --> 00:08:07.581
<v Jacob Paulsen>another one from Brian Eastridge, or excuse me, Wayne Dobbs I'm thinking of

00:08:07.581 --> 00:08:10.921
<v Jacob Paulsen>more recently. There's one from Daryl Bulkey. That's some time ago.

00:08:11.441 --> 00:08:15.321
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then Brian Eastridge this week as well. I'm getting ready to add one from Justin Dial.

00:08:16.081 --> 00:08:20.241
<v Jacob Paulsen>So the point is we're always adding kind of these one-off videos as well,

00:08:20.341 --> 00:08:22.521
<v Jacob Paulsen>above and beyond the full-length video courses.

00:08:23.778 --> 00:08:27.158
<v Riley Bowman>Hey, you know, there's one other thing, too, I think we ought to talk about right now.

00:08:27.338 --> 00:08:30.278
<v Riley Bowman>And I'm going to use this opportunity before we get to our other sponsor message

00:08:30.278 --> 00:08:35.498
<v Riley Bowman>to go into our new segment that has no name.

00:08:37.538 --> 00:08:38.058
<v Riley Bowman>What's that?

00:08:38.298 --> 00:08:39.338
<v Jacob Paulsen>The no name segment.

00:08:39.438 --> 00:08:44.638
<v Riley Bowman>The no name segment now. Yeah. Of, you know, what's new? What's going on?

00:08:45.178 --> 00:08:47.918
<v Riley Bowman>What's the latest from us here at concealedcarry.com?

00:08:48.578 --> 00:08:52.898
<v Riley Bowman>And so let's jump into that real quick. And what it was is I thought it'd be

00:08:52.898 --> 00:08:56.818
<v Riley Bowman>good for us to, since we're talking about Guardian Nation, and you get access

00:08:56.818 --> 00:08:59.938
<v Riley Bowman>to a dashboard with, you know, all these resources available to you,

00:09:00.098 --> 00:09:02.878
<v Riley Bowman>including product discounts from industry partners of ours.

00:09:03.118 --> 00:09:07.498
<v Riley Bowman>And, of course, you know, being able to get to the video content for the entire training library.

00:09:07.798 --> 00:09:11.858
<v Riley Bowman>But, Jacob, we just, I say we, but really you, just did a bunch of work this

00:09:11.858 --> 00:09:16.878
<v Riley Bowman>week to make that member's dashboard a lot better, a lot cleaner, and easier to use.

00:09:16.878 --> 00:09:21.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and I'm not done. But yeah, when you go to consolecare.com,

00:09:21.218 --> 00:09:25.978
<v Jacob Paulsen>up at the top corner it says user dashboard slash login. You click on that. It logs you in.

00:09:26.198 --> 00:09:28.818
<v Jacob Paulsen>The URL is consolecare.com forward slash my dash account.

00:09:29.458 --> 00:09:33.658
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that dashboard, that first page you see when you land there is way better.

00:09:33.818 --> 00:09:35.058
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just a massive improvement.

00:09:35.238 --> 00:09:38.358
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's so much easier for you to see at a glance if you have any store credit,

00:09:38.498 --> 00:09:41.998
<v Jacob Paulsen>Guardian Gold, courses that you have in progress that you haven't finished.

00:09:42.218 --> 00:09:44.058
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can see recent orders and their status.

00:09:44.798 --> 00:09:48.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've also done a little bit of upgrading to a tool that I don't know if we've

00:09:48.198 --> 00:09:50.918
<v Jacob Paulsen>ever mentioned on this podcast ever, but we've had it since like 2015.

00:09:51.618 --> 00:09:55.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that is that on our site, you can track your concealed carry permits and

00:09:55.198 --> 00:09:56.178
<v Jacob Paulsen>their expiration dates.

00:09:56.808 --> 00:09:59.468
<v Jacob Paulsen>I have multiple permits. Most of you listed this probably only have one.

00:09:59.668 --> 00:10:02.928
<v Jacob Paulsen>But on that user dashboard, you can click on my permits, and you can put in

00:10:02.928 --> 00:10:05.528
<v Jacob Paulsen>what's your resident state and the expiration date on your permit.

00:10:05.728 --> 00:10:10.268
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's not our intent to invade your privacy. This is optional. You don't have to do it.

00:10:10.408 --> 00:10:14.188
<v Jacob Paulsen>But if you do, then you'll receive an e-mail from us at 120 days prior to the

00:10:14.188 --> 00:10:17.648
<v Jacob Paulsen>expiration date and at 60 days prior to that expiration date to just give you

00:10:17.648 --> 00:10:19.168
<v Jacob Paulsen>a reminder to renew your permit.

00:10:19.528 --> 00:10:22.728
<v Jacob Paulsen>And some of you live in states where the government might actually remind you.

00:10:22.868 --> 00:10:25.968
<v Jacob Paulsen>Me and Riley live in a state where you get no reminder at all.

00:10:25.968 --> 00:10:29.928
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's completely on your own and so getting an email from us might be useful

00:10:29.928 --> 00:10:36.948
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah so really cool uh new update to that dashboard yep yeah so and it really

00:10:36.948 --> 00:10:39.888
<v Riley Bowman>that dashboard's improved not just for guardian nation members but you know

00:10:39.888 --> 00:10:41.708
<v Riley Bowman>right everybody has access to that dashboard yeah yeah.

00:10:42.108 --> 00:10:44.368
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we're gonna make some other improvements along those lines here yeah

00:10:44.368 --> 00:10:49.768
<v Riley Bowman>Super cool so that's probably the latest greatest uh news from us here until

00:10:49.768 --> 00:10:54.228
<v Riley Bowman>carry.com uh those that are guardian nation members uh happy to report that

00:10:54.228 --> 00:11:01.488
<v Riley Bowman>your most recent guardian nation box of gear is uh in the process of being boxed

00:11:01.488 --> 00:11:03.128
<v Riley Bowman>up right now as we speak we.

00:11:03.128 --> 00:11:05.508
<v Jacob Paulsen>Have a couple hundred of them i think exactly 200 done today

00:11:05.508 --> 00:11:06.548
<v Riley Bowman>And uh yeah.

00:11:06.548 --> 00:11:08.268
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's it's a whole project but it's

00:11:08.268 --> 00:11:11.048
<v Riley Bowman>Coming yeah so a couple more days and we'll get the rest of those all

00:11:11.048 --> 00:11:14.648
<v Riley Bowman>boxed up and and shipped out to you members so

00:11:14.648 --> 00:11:17.788
<v Riley Bowman>uh be looking for those in your mailboxes right quick

00:11:17.788 --> 00:11:21.328
<v Riley Bowman>very very very soon yep so very excited about that let's get

00:11:21.328 --> 00:11:24.868
<v Riley Bowman>back to sponsor messages so by the way if i didn't mention the link but in case

00:11:24.868 --> 00:11:27.768
<v Riley Bowman>you don't know of course you can always go to concealed carry.com and find this

00:11:27.768 --> 00:11:32.488
<v Riley Bowman>information but you can also go directly to guardian nation.com to learn more

00:11:32.488 --> 00:11:36.548
<v Riley Bowman>about what guardian nation is why you might want to join and also be able to

00:11:36.548 --> 00:11:38.468
<v Riley Bowman>join right there from that page,

00:11:39.632 --> 00:11:43.912
<v Riley Bowman>Our other episode sponsor is CCW Safe. So we're going to be talking about a

00:11:43.912 --> 00:11:46.832
<v Riley Bowman>major legal doctrine today, Stand Your Ground.

00:11:47.192 --> 00:11:50.732
<v Riley Bowman>And, I mean, we're talking about legal things. People get in trouble.

00:11:51.492 --> 00:11:54.812
<v Riley Bowman>And sometimes not necessarily in trouble because they did something wrong.

00:11:54.932 --> 00:11:59.252
<v Riley Bowman>That's the way it goes frequently with self-defense shootings.

00:12:00.412 --> 00:12:03.792
<v Riley Bowman>And I would say particularly those that take place outside of the home,

00:12:03.952 --> 00:12:10.272
<v Riley Bowman>which is really where Stand Your Ground most often gets applied when it does get applied. right.

00:12:10.752 --> 00:12:11.992
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's always the only place it gets

00:12:11.992 --> 00:12:16.892
<v Riley Bowman>Played well yeah I mean yeah I guess there's a case that you could you could make about,

00:12:17.909 --> 00:12:21.669
<v Riley Bowman>inside the home also being, well, when we get into talking about Stand Your

00:12:21.669 --> 00:12:23.089
<v Riley Bowman>Ground, this all makes sense.

00:12:23.369 --> 00:12:28.289
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, CCW Safe, you're going to want good, solid legal defense coverage.

00:12:28.629 --> 00:12:30.729
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, what are you going to do about all those legal costs?

00:12:30.809 --> 00:12:31.969
<v Riley Bowman>How are you going to hire an attorney?

00:12:32.789 --> 00:12:36.569
<v Riley Bowman>You know, where's that going to come from? I don't know if you got just a reserve

00:12:36.569 --> 00:12:40.709
<v Riley Bowman>cash fund sitting there ready for that kind of thing. I hope you do.

00:12:40.909 --> 00:12:45.849
<v Riley Bowman>But even then, there are some of these cases, including some that we might even

00:12:45.849 --> 00:12:49.929
<v Riley Bowman>talk about today, where you would exhaust, unless you're very,

00:12:50.049 --> 00:12:52.369
<v Riley Bowman>very wealthy, you would exhaust your savings.

00:12:52.649 --> 00:12:57.449
<v Riley Bowman>You would exhaust your investment accounts. You would just blow through money

00:12:57.449 --> 00:12:58.649
<v Riley Bowman>trying to defend yourself.

00:12:58.989 --> 00:13:04.569
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's why you want a good legal team. And I mean a team, not just an attorney.

00:13:04.769 --> 00:13:08.549
<v Riley Bowman>And yes, attorneys put together teams. But really the best thing I think about

00:13:08.549 --> 00:13:18.969
<v Riley Bowman>CCW Safe, Jacob, is that they really, they pride themselves on creating their own legal team.

00:13:19.189 --> 00:13:25.129
<v Riley Bowman>They are really there as a resource to whichever attorney or attorney's office

00:13:25.129 --> 00:13:27.149
<v Riley Bowman>gets hired to take on your case.

00:13:27.269 --> 00:13:28.429
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes, that's what I'll just say.

00:13:28.549 --> 00:13:31.769
<v Riley Bowman>And they are right there with multiple experts,

00:13:31.769 --> 00:13:34.529
<v Riley Bowman>including people who have been through shootings themselves,

00:13:34.529 --> 00:13:40.229
<v Riley Bowman>People have defended cases directly, including some very high profile ones that

00:13:40.229 --> 00:13:45.849
<v Riley Bowman>are essentially consultants and expert, well,

00:13:45.949 --> 00:13:46.909
<v Riley Bowman>yeah, not witnesses,

00:13:47.109 --> 00:13:49.209
<v Riley Bowman>but what's the term?

00:13:49.929 --> 00:13:53.309
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, they have two consultants, but they also do have expert witnesses for various topics.

00:13:53.329 --> 00:13:55.969
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, sure. Expert witnesses. I was just thinking like just experts.

00:13:56.169 --> 00:14:02.129
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, that are able to be a resource to your legal team. So they become a

00:14:02.129 --> 00:14:04.189
<v Riley Bowman>part of that team that's going to work with good defense.

00:14:04.189 --> 00:14:06.649
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, so they call it the critical response team. Exactly. Yeah,

00:14:06.709 --> 00:14:11.149
<v Jacob Paulsen>on that team, there are former prosecutors, former homicide investigators, detectives. Yeah.

00:14:11.469 --> 00:14:15.669
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, all types. And it's full court press for them.

00:14:16.559 --> 00:14:22.039
<v Riley Bowman>So it is a huge benefit, I think, of membership is that this team stands behind

00:14:22.039 --> 00:14:24.919
<v Riley Bowman>you when you are a CCWSAFE member. So consider joining today.

00:14:25.139 --> 00:14:28.899
<v Riley Bowman>I hope that this episode today will encourage you to do so if you haven't already.

00:14:29.059 --> 00:14:33.739
<v Riley Bowman>So go to CCWSAFE.com to learn more about their coverage plans.

00:14:34.179 --> 00:14:38.199
<v Riley Bowman>And just a little note that Guardian Nation members get a discount.

00:14:38.759 --> 00:14:39.479
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes, sir.

00:14:39.679 --> 00:14:43.219
<v Riley Bowman>So that's one of those discounts that we mentioned earlier. Let's jump into

00:14:43.219 --> 00:14:46.459
<v Riley Bowman>it. All right, Jacob, stand your ground.

00:14:47.319 --> 00:14:52.719
<v Riley Bowman>And again, we kind of in the intro talked about how it is, stand your ground

00:14:52.719 --> 00:14:59.459
<v Riley Bowman>becomes, is a legal doctrine that's used far less than people probably expect.

00:15:00.319 --> 00:15:03.919
<v Riley Bowman>It exists. It's an important thing. I think it's good that we have,

00:15:04.099 --> 00:15:07.379
<v Riley Bowman>not every state, by the way, is a stand your ground state.

00:15:07.519 --> 00:15:09.599
<v Riley Bowman>That should be clear. And that's something we can, we could start,

00:15:09.759 --> 00:15:11.859
<v Riley Bowman>you know, here pretty early on in explaining.

00:15:13.559 --> 00:15:18.839
<v Riley Bowman>But it exists, and I think it exists for a good purpose. But it doesn't come

00:15:18.839 --> 00:15:21.439
<v Riley Bowman>into play as often as people think, and there's reasons for that.

00:15:21.619 --> 00:15:23.979
<v Riley Bowman>So where should we start? Defining it?

00:15:24.419 --> 00:15:27.859
<v Riley Bowman>Talking about states that are or are not stand-your-ground states?

00:15:27.919 --> 00:15:28.599
<v Riley Bowman>Or where do you want to go?

00:15:28.739 --> 00:15:33.419
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I think we need to address it or kind of put it in a reference and context,

00:15:33.619 --> 00:15:34.559
<v Jacob Paulsen>and then we can define it.

00:15:34.879 --> 00:15:39.379
<v Jacob Paulsen>But stand-your-ground is a reference to the opposite. it.

00:15:39.459 --> 00:15:43.499
<v Jacob Paulsen>It is the antonym to duty to retreat.

00:15:44.039 --> 00:15:47.439
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I think that's where we have to start is understanding duty to retreat versus stand your ground.

00:15:48.019 --> 00:15:52.679
<v Jacob Paulsen>And these terms have become popularized because this happens to be a self-defense

00:15:52.679 --> 00:15:57.879
<v Jacob Paulsen>requirement, here's the context, that is not universally true across the entire country.

00:15:58.119 --> 00:16:01.739
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so because of that, we've come up with these terms that we use to describe

00:16:01.739 --> 00:16:04.819
<v Jacob Paulsen>states that are or are not this way or that way.

00:16:05.319 --> 00:16:08.719
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm going to take it up a level now then I'll come back down.

00:16:09.817 --> 00:16:16.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>In order for you to claim self-defense, it is a method to justify an otherwise illegal act, right?

00:16:16.377 --> 00:16:20.597
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if you use force against somebody, you punch someone, you put them in a chokehold,

00:16:20.677 --> 00:16:23.337
<v Jacob Paulsen>you shoot them, stab them, tie them to a chair.

00:16:23.557 --> 00:16:27.177
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like if you use some sort of use of force against another human,

00:16:27.397 --> 00:16:31.237
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's a criminal act. Like we don't like that, we decided in our society.

00:16:31.737 --> 00:16:36.397
<v Jacob Paulsen>But there are some circumstances that we deem to be exceptions where it's justified.

00:16:36.817 --> 00:16:40.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's a justified use of force, which is how many statutes in a lot of states

00:16:40.277 --> 00:16:41.977
<v Jacob Paulsen>label this, a justified force.

00:16:42.337 --> 00:16:47.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>So one of those exceptions, one of the situations where we deem use of force

00:16:47.917 --> 00:16:50.877
<v Jacob Paulsen>against another person to be justified is self-defense.

00:16:51.077 --> 00:16:53.737
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, you had to do it to defend yourself or another innocent party.

00:16:54.177 --> 00:16:56.677
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we can't just take you at your word. You can't just say,

00:16:56.757 --> 00:16:59.957
<v Jacob Paulsen>well, it was self-defense. There's got to be some objective criteria we use

00:16:59.957 --> 00:17:01.417
<v Jacob Paulsen>to decide if something was self-defense.

00:17:01.697 --> 00:17:05.617
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so there's these requirements or elements, whatever term you prefer.

00:17:05.617 --> 00:17:14.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this particular one, this idea of duty to retreat, is one of those requirements in some states.

00:17:14.317 --> 00:17:19.997
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I think that's the high-level context that allows us to get to it and then

00:17:19.997 --> 00:17:21.337
<v Jacob Paulsen>define it or flush it out.

00:17:22.222 --> 00:17:29.182
<v Riley Bowman>That's good context. So just to kind of recap that there are certain states

00:17:29.182 --> 00:17:37.062
<v Riley Bowman>where before you may use justifiable defense, particularly deadly force,

00:17:37.842 --> 00:17:44.362
<v Riley Bowman>you know, defensive force, you need to meet the standard of retreating.

00:17:44.462 --> 00:17:44.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes.

00:17:45.042 --> 00:17:46.402
<v Riley Bowman>Or at least making the effort to retreat.

00:17:46.682 --> 00:17:50.702
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. When safely able is the way I like to phrase this. So I would think of

00:17:50.702 --> 00:17:54.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>it this way. Like our self-defense laws in this country are based on English common law.

00:17:54.902 --> 00:17:55.062
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:17:55.342 --> 00:17:56.062
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? So if you go way.

00:17:56.062 --> 00:17:58.362
<v Riley Bowman>We're talking about stuff that goes way back to like Magna Carta.

00:17:58.462 --> 00:18:02.042
<v Jacob Paulsen>Think like castles and moats and stuff, right?

00:18:02.382 --> 00:18:06.442
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. So I think the origin, like if you really went back and looked at English

00:18:06.442 --> 00:18:09.722
<v Jacob Paulsen>common law, the origin of this idea was, hey, you should, you know,

00:18:09.742 --> 00:18:13.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>before we start to think it's justified to use force against people,

00:18:13.902 --> 00:18:15.182
<v Jacob Paulsen>you should just run away.

00:18:15.722 --> 00:18:18.762
<v Jacob Paulsen>And only when you hit the wall, the outer wall, When you can't get away because

00:18:18.762 --> 00:18:24.962
<v Jacob Paulsen>you're up against the wall of the castle kind of thing, of the whatever thing

00:18:24.962 --> 00:18:28.522
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's called, the block, the veil, the thing,

00:18:28.802 --> 00:18:32.982
<v Jacob Paulsen>then you – now you can use force. And so that's the origin.

00:18:33.442 --> 00:18:36.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's the real classic way of thinking of it.

00:18:36.662 --> 00:18:40.182
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, bring it down here a little bit more central to us, and you've got to think,

00:18:40.702 --> 00:18:47.562
<v Jacob Paulsen>okay, so the concept here as a doctrine is that you should not be using force

00:18:47.562 --> 00:18:50.742
<v Jacob Paulsen>against somebody if you could just safely retreat.

00:18:51.402 --> 00:18:56.922
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you have the means and the ability to just retreat from the threat safely,

00:18:57.922 --> 00:19:01.682
<v Jacob Paulsen>then you shouldn't be using force to defend yourself. You should just be leaving.

00:19:02.302 --> 00:19:04.362
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, there's some nuance there because –

00:19:06.149 --> 00:19:09.029
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm careful about some of the ways I've tried to word these things.

00:19:09.129 --> 00:19:14.489
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I like to say retreat when safely able so I don't have to put myself in jeopardy

00:19:14.489 --> 00:19:16.669
<v Jacob Paulsen>in order to retreat from the threat, right?

00:19:16.789 --> 00:19:22.369
<v Jacob Paulsen>I also think it's important to note that you don't have to abandon other innocent people,

00:19:22.849 --> 00:19:23.009
<v Riley Bowman>Right?

00:19:23.149 --> 00:19:27.369
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's not like, oh, I got my elderly parents here or my children here,

00:19:27.389 --> 00:19:30.449
<v Jacob Paulsen>and I can safely retreat because I'm capable of running fast enough,

00:19:30.489 --> 00:19:33.569
<v Jacob Paulsen>but they can't, so I just have to leave them at the mercy of the attacker.

00:19:33.949 --> 00:19:39.149
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's not a thing either. The doctrine of duty to retreat or stand your ground,

00:19:39.309 --> 00:19:40.729
<v Jacob Paulsen>whichever side of this we're looking at,

00:19:40.969 --> 00:19:46.689
<v Jacob Paulsen>is this idea that if me and the other innocent parties collectively can safely

00:19:46.689 --> 00:19:51.569
<v Jacob Paulsen>retreat from the attacker, then that's the course of action that is warranted.

00:19:51.669 --> 00:19:56.689
<v Jacob Paulsen>That we only have a right to use force in our defense if we're unable to safely

00:19:56.689 --> 00:19:58.789
<v Jacob Paulsen>retreat as a group, as innocent parties.

00:19:59.149 --> 00:20:02.609
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And you could see this be applied.

00:20:02.609 --> 00:20:09.729
<v Riley Bowman>Like there's some nuance to how it may be written in laws in various states

00:20:09.729 --> 00:20:18.309
<v Riley Bowman>to where it could be applied at sort of different levels of,

00:20:20.753 --> 00:20:24.953
<v Riley Bowman>not detail or aggressiveness, but just sort of like,

00:20:26.313 --> 00:20:35.333
<v Riley Bowman>how much effort do you need to go through to retreat and to avoid the use of

00:20:35.333 --> 00:20:37.713
<v Riley Bowman>force before you're able to do so?

00:20:38.873 --> 00:20:42.313
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, it's the nature of our legal system is that we have objective criteria

00:20:42.313 --> 00:20:45.133
<v Jacob Paulsen>that is determined subjectively.

00:20:45.293 --> 00:20:45.513
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:20:46.093 --> 00:20:51.053
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? So we have humans who decide whether or not you know, you could have run away.

00:20:51.253 --> 00:20:55.513
<v Jacob Paulsen>We have humans who decide whether or not that alternative exit that you didn't

00:20:55.513 --> 00:20:59.093
<v Jacob Paulsen>take was really put yourself in more jeopardy or not.

00:20:59.333 --> 00:21:06.553
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is the nature of our legal system, that a judge and or a jury has to make

00:21:06.553 --> 00:21:11.113
<v Jacob Paulsen>a subjective decision based on an objective definition.

00:21:13.616 --> 00:21:17.716
<v Riley Bowman>And I think that over time, what you've seen is that people,

00:21:17.816 --> 00:21:20.536
<v Riley Bowman>and I'm just speaking pretty broadly and generally here,

00:21:21.136 --> 00:21:26.396
<v Riley Bowman>have, I think this is a very reasonable take that people kind of as they reasoned

00:21:26.396 --> 00:21:30.676
<v Riley Bowman>about these sorts of things kind of start, you know, thinking like,

00:21:31.076 --> 00:21:38.056
<v Riley Bowman>well, hey, if I'm lawfully and legally able to be present in a certain place

00:21:38.056 --> 00:21:41.996
<v Riley Bowman>at a certain time, I'm just minding my own business.

00:21:41.996 --> 00:21:47.476
<v Riley Bowman>I am not a party to anything in particular. I'm not an aggressor.

00:21:47.676 --> 00:21:49.196
<v Riley Bowman>I'm not trying to instigate anything.

00:21:49.656 --> 00:21:56.496
<v Riley Bowman>I'm just me doing my thing completely legally, like any other lawful citizen

00:21:56.496 --> 00:21:59.236
<v Riley Bowman>would be doing in this place at this given time.

00:21:59.756 --> 00:22:04.456
<v Riley Bowman>That it's sort of like, well, that seems kind of unreasonable that someone that

00:22:04.456 --> 00:22:09.496
<v Riley Bowman>fits that context should have to do anything if they're presented with a threat.

00:22:09.496 --> 00:22:14.976
<v Riley Bowman>And so you've seen this kind of pushback over the last couple hundred years,

00:22:15.276 --> 00:22:19.136
<v Riley Bowman>at least of the history of our country, kind of suggesting, well,

00:22:19.236 --> 00:22:20.716
<v Riley Bowman>hold on here. And so actually...

00:22:21.286 --> 00:22:25.786
<v Riley Bowman>Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in a Supreme Court opinion, wrote something to

00:22:25.786 --> 00:22:31.806
<v Riley Bowman>the effect of that a person is not obliged to retreat if they are without fault

00:22:31.806 --> 00:22:33.666
<v Riley Bowman>in a particular situation.

00:22:33.866 --> 00:22:37.266
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's where you start to see some of this a little bit more codified,

00:22:37.326 --> 00:22:44.026
<v Riley Bowman>if you will, in the law or at least in rulings and in cases that at least the

00:22:44.026 --> 00:22:45.886
<v Riley Bowman>Supreme Court has been involved in.

00:22:45.886 --> 00:22:49.906
<v Riley Bowman>And then now, you know, in the last hundred years, particularly in the last

00:22:49.906 --> 00:22:55.486
<v Riley Bowman>probably 50, 60, 70 years, you start to see states get on board with this idea of,

00:22:55.946 --> 00:23:01.266
<v Riley Bowman>okay, we think it's unfair and unreasonable that a lawful person should have

00:23:01.266 --> 00:23:03.666
<v Riley Bowman>to retreat before defending themselves.

00:23:04.306 --> 00:23:06.686
<v Riley Bowman>And I think there's some good reasons for that. Let me present,

00:23:06.686 --> 00:23:10.906
<v Riley Bowman>you know, probably the most popular thought I think on this would be that,

00:23:11.226 --> 00:23:15.766
<v Riley Bowman>well, hey, and I would put this in the, you know, to kind of draw some comparison

00:23:15.766 --> 00:23:20.546
<v Riley Bowman>here that the last few years we, in country, in our country goes through cycles like this.

00:23:20.666 --> 00:23:25.146
<v Riley Bowman>But we've seen in the last couple of years as law enforcement had,

00:23:25.326 --> 00:23:29.986
<v Riley Bowman>there's been, you know, some high profile incidents involving cops where,

00:23:29.986 --> 00:23:31.706
<v Riley Bowman>you know, shootings have happened, whatever.

00:23:32.506 --> 00:23:35.366
<v Riley Bowman>And um you know just as

00:23:35.366 --> 00:23:38.706
<v Riley Bowman>one very popular example i mean like the uh

00:23:38.706 --> 00:23:41.546
<v Riley Bowman>uh uh brown what was his first

00:23:41.546 --> 00:23:46.906
<v Riley Bowman>name um out of like i think it was st louis or kansas yeah i'm sorry anyway

00:23:46.906 --> 00:23:54.166
<v Riley Bowman>um yeah brown right um you know very it was a very very very heated cop shooting

00:23:54.166 --> 00:23:59.946
<v Riley Bowman>involving uh anyway just having a moment, a moment, a senior moment here.

00:24:00.086 --> 00:24:03.346
<v Riley Bowman>I'm going to claim that I'm not a senior yet, but, you know,

00:24:03.426 --> 00:24:08.246
<v Riley Bowman>I'm getting closer all the time, but anyway, so, you know, you have cops that

00:24:08.246 --> 00:24:11.366
<v Riley Bowman>were the, the, the popular Michael Brown, Michael Brown. Thank you.

00:24:12.826 --> 00:24:14.066
<v Riley Bowman>That's funny because I was,

00:24:16.317 --> 00:24:21.157
<v Riley Bowman>uh radio show host named michael brown i'm like that's not right is it no it is that's yeah and.

00:24:21.157 --> 00:24:24.217
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you said if you'd said ferguson missouri i think i might have caught on

00:24:24.217 --> 00:24:27.037
<v Riley Bowman>Faster ferguson's like a suburb of st louis yeah yeah yeah

00:24:27.037 --> 00:24:29.917
<v Riley Bowman>that's why i was like anyway st louis anyway we both struggled yeah

00:24:29.917 --> 00:24:32.957
<v Riley Bowman>michael brown right okay so i'm just using as one very

00:24:32.957 --> 00:24:36.057
<v Riley Bowman>very popular example where an office you know that officer

00:24:36.057 --> 00:24:39.137
<v Riley Bowman>used uh the force that he did and that caught

00:24:39.137 --> 00:24:42.077
<v Riley Bowman>a lot of heat a lot of attention and start seeing public opinion

00:24:42.077 --> 00:24:47.037
<v Riley Bowman>sway and then you see more and more you know uh whether it's actual statutes

00:24:47.037 --> 00:24:52.577
<v Riley Bowman>that are passed by states or just police departments in general start changing

00:24:52.577 --> 00:25:00.237
<v Riley Bowman>policy and basically start kind of handcuffing in a way officers ability to respond to threat.

00:25:00.477 --> 00:25:04.257
<v Riley Bowman>You start seeing like just last week, Jacob, I've seen a couple of officer involved

00:25:04.257 --> 00:25:10.637
<v Riley Bowman>shooting body cam footages where I'm like, why is that officer showing so much

00:25:10.637 --> 00:25:12.757
<v Riley Bowman>restraint? I mean, I'll give you one example.

00:25:12.997 --> 00:25:14.997
<v Riley Bowman>Man's very, very clearly got a knife.

00:25:15.997 --> 00:25:20.417
<v Riley Bowman>He's advancing on a fellow officer. And this cop that we're,

00:25:20.497 --> 00:25:23.097
<v Riley Bowman>you know, from his viewpoint that we're watching, I mean, he's not the immediate,

00:25:23.097 --> 00:25:25.177
<v Riley Bowman>like, a target of this threat.

00:25:25.557 --> 00:25:29.437
<v Riley Bowman>But he's got a very good vantage point. He's got his gun out. He's aimed.

00:25:30.057 --> 00:25:33.497
<v Riley Bowman>And that guy starts advancing on this other officer.

00:25:34.097 --> 00:25:38.357
<v Riley Bowman>And, I mean, there's just an immense amount of restraint.

00:25:38.877 --> 00:25:42.497
<v Riley Bowman>That and I understand like we have the ability as

00:25:42.497 --> 00:25:47.597
<v Riley Bowman>humans frankly to just be like you know what what I feel okay with in this moment

00:25:47.597 --> 00:25:52.357
<v Riley Bowman>is I don't want to have to take this man's life I would really like to resolve

00:25:52.357 --> 00:25:55.937
<v Riley Bowman>this without the use of deadly force I'm gonna do everything I can to avoid

00:25:55.937 --> 00:25:58.377
<v Riley Bowman>that and I understand that and that's kind of what we're talking about here

00:25:58.377 --> 00:26:01.617
<v Riley Bowman>with duty retreat is like trying to avoid conflict.

00:26:02.490 --> 00:26:09.110
<v Riley Bowman>But you see things kind of sway politically and even legally to where it becomes,

00:26:09.310 --> 00:26:14.770
<v Riley Bowman>for various reasons, because other officers have been prosecuted for bad shoots,

00:26:14.770 --> 00:26:20.370
<v Riley Bowman>and now you see cops start to be a lot more hesitant to use deadly force.

00:26:20.370 --> 00:26:25.510
<v Riley Bowman>Now, I know I just went down this rabbit hole, but I'm trying to make this comparison, if you will,

00:26:25.590 --> 00:26:29.650
<v Riley Bowman>to when you have a duty to retreat in place for citizens,

00:26:29.650 --> 00:26:37.610
<v Riley Bowman>you're giving them this additional requirement to an already complicated and

00:26:37.610 --> 00:26:42.750
<v Riley Bowman>complex situation in many cases where it's like, you know,

00:26:43.050 --> 00:26:48.270
<v Riley Bowman>does somebody then hesitate to act that could be harmful to them?

00:26:48.890 --> 00:26:51.810
<v Riley Bowman>Because they're like, oh, crap, I got to retreat. I got to retreat.

00:26:52.490 --> 00:26:54.650
<v Riley Bowman>And so what do you think about that?

00:26:54.930 --> 00:26:58.630
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that a lot of the court cases and laws we've seen, and we're going to

00:26:58.630 --> 00:27:02.350
<v Jacob Paulsen>get into that a little bit more specifically, I think that a lot of them are

00:27:02.350 --> 00:27:07.630
<v Jacob Paulsen>designed to reduce the fallacy of arbitrary subjective opinions.

00:27:09.030 --> 00:27:11.790
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we were talking about that a second ago when I said, you're talking about

00:27:11.790 --> 00:27:16.650
<v Jacob Paulsen>a judge or a jury or before that, a cop, a prosecutor, right?

00:27:17.515 --> 00:27:21.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>Them on their own deciding whether or not you did or didn't have a safe means

00:27:21.775 --> 00:27:25.375
<v Jacob Paulsen>of retreat or was or wasn't prudent to do so.

00:27:25.595 --> 00:27:28.375
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think that, yeah, at some point someone's like, wait a minute, like why?

00:27:28.695 --> 00:27:31.315
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is crazy. Yeah. Right? Like why?

00:27:31.715 --> 00:27:37.515
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, let's accept. I will accept for me personally on face value that it

00:27:37.515 --> 00:27:43.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>is good tactics to retreat when safely able with all the other innocent parties.

00:27:43.255 --> 00:27:46.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like I'm all for that as a best practice.

00:27:47.115 --> 00:27:52.115
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I absolutely don't want to have the legal requirement to do it because I

00:27:52.115 --> 00:27:56.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>want to be able to exercise my own judgment and what qualifies as safe retreat.

00:27:57.135 --> 00:28:01.595
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know? And so that's, that's really, I think the, the gist of this,

00:28:01.615 --> 00:28:05.655
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'll, I'll give one other thought here. And that is, um,

00:28:07.397 --> 00:28:11.857
<v Jacob Paulsen>innocent parties starts to get complicated too uh so so you know if there's

00:28:11.857 --> 00:28:15.317
<v Jacob Paulsen>an active shooting in the mall like maybe i can retreat for me but i i don't

00:28:15.317 --> 00:28:18.257
<v Jacob Paulsen>have to you know do i have to abandon all these other innocent people in the

00:28:18.257 --> 00:28:22.817
<v Jacob Paulsen>mall or can i go hunting right so i think that those are other things we have

00:28:22.817 --> 00:28:24.437
<v Jacob Paulsen>to think about right when we talk about

00:28:24.437 --> 00:28:28.337
<v Riley Bowman>Like you make the decision in that kind of situation this is like a mass shooting

00:28:28.337 --> 00:28:33.257
<v Riley Bowman>of some kind to instead of just being focused on even defending yourself you're

00:28:33.257 --> 00:28:37.357
<v Riley Bowman>like there is somebody out there actively killing people and for whatever reason

00:28:37.357 --> 00:28:39.697
<v Riley Bowman>I've made the decision that I'm going to try to put an end to.

00:28:39.697 --> 00:28:41.517
<v Jacob Paulsen>It. I think I should have the right to make that decision.

00:28:41.717 --> 00:28:44.337
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And duty to treat would put that into question for sure.

00:28:44.497 --> 00:28:48.457
<v Jacob Paulsen>Potential question. I think potential question. And I think that's the point

00:28:48.457 --> 00:28:55.397
<v Jacob Paulsen>is it's like we can't write laws in a way that remove the potential for ambiguity

00:28:55.397 --> 00:28:57.697
<v Jacob Paulsen>when human opinions are judging

00:28:58.457 --> 00:29:01.957
<v Jacob Paulsen>until the point where we just remove that as a requirement at all.

00:29:02.097 --> 00:29:04.417
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's what most states have done.

00:29:04.817 --> 00:29:10.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if we look at it at a number line, of the 51 states, including DC,

00:29:10.917 --> 00:29:14.237
<v Jacob Paulsen>39 of them are Stand Your Ground.

00:29:14.357 --> 00:29:19.457
<v Jacob Paulsen>And by Stand Your Ground, I simply mean that there is the absence of a requirement to retreat.

00:29:20.117 --> 00:29:26.757
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we have 39 states that said no duty retreat, and we tend to use the term

00:29:26.757 --> 00:29:28.997
<v Jacob Paulsen>Stand Your Ground to refer to that.

00:29:29.577 --> 00:29:34.377
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then we have the other, whatever it would be, 12 states that say,

00:29:34.457 --> 00:29:36.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>no, you do have a duty retreat some of the time.

00:29:36.337 --> 00:29:39.137
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we'll get into more specificity on that, certainly.

00:29:39.517 --> 00:29:43.317
<v Jacob Paulsen>But that's kind of the split here. And I think it's worth understanding a little

00:29:43.317 --> 00:29:46.437
<v Jacob Paulsen>bit what that can look like because of those 39 states...

00:29:48.294 --> 00:29:50.914
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know, we should clarify, this would be a good time for me to add a disclaimer.

00:29:51.054 --> 00:29:52.854
<v Jacob Paulsen>We should add at the beginning, which is in case you didn't know,

00:29:52.934 --> 00:29:53.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>Riley and I are not attorneys.

00:29:56.054 --> 00:29:57.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>Have you been to law school?

00:29:57.474 --> 00:29:57.794
<v Riley Bowman>Nope.

00:29:58.134 --> 00:29:58.754
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, me neither.

00:29:58.954 --> 00:30:03.694
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, just, you know, the law school of YouTube. That's right.

00:30:04.074 --> 00:30:07.394
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, so I, we should have said this at the beginning, but you know,

00:30:07.434 --> 00:30:12.454
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that we're relatively well studied people, but we're not just should

00:30:12.454 --> 00:30:15.074
<v Jacob Paulsen>clarify, this is not legal advice and all that kind of stuff.

00:30:15.414 --> 00:30:15.574
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:30:15.974 --> 00:30:17.694
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you should go, you know, research your own state.

00:30:17.694 --> 00:30:22.734
<v Riley Bowman>We have our standard disclaimer still at the end of every episode that says something like that.

00:30:22.814 --> 00:30:25.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you don't listen to the end, then here's that disclaimer now.

00:30:25.094 --> 00:30:28.534
<v Riley Bowman>Just know that this is something that, I mean, we live in this space.

00:30:28.534 --> 00:30:32.214
<v Riley Bowman>This is something that we are interested in, that we've studied for a long time

00:30:32.214 --> 00:30:34.374
<v Riley Bowman>because we're talking about concealed carry issues.

00:30:34.374 --> 00:30:39.594
<v Jacob Paulsen>I definitely did not always understand this well. So I'm sympathetic to people who do not.

00:30:40.194 --> 00:30:42.734
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay, so back to what I was going to say. So I think there are 39 states that

00:30:42.734 --> 00:30:45.334
<v Jacob Paulsen>stand to ground states or states that do not have a duty to retreat,

00:30:45.494 --> 00:30:47.894
<v Jacob Paulsen>however you want to refer to that. But there's different versions of that.

00:30:47.994 --> 00:30:52.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you have some states that have, that they've passed a statute that says,

00:30:52.114 --> 00:30:55.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, you do not have to retreat, even if you safely could kind of thing.

00:30:55.814 --> 00:31:00.334
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's not far from the wording of some of these. You have other states where

00:31:00.334 --> 00:31:02.674
<v Jacob Paulsen>there's, we call them standard ground states, but there's no statute.

00:31:02.834 --> 00:31:04.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>What you have is a court decision.

00:31:04.594 --> 00:31:07.294
<v Jacob Paulsen>So maybe the state Supreme Court or an appellate court or somebody,

00:31:07.494 --> 00:31:10.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>there was a specific case and they ruled on that case and said,

00:31:10.914 --> 00:31:14.654
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, no, even though this person could have retreated, that's just not necessary.

00:31:14.654 --> 00:31:20.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's not required. So it's not a statutory, you know, stand your ground kind of law.

00:31:20.354 --> 00:31:24.814
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just a court decision that holds as a precedent until such time that somebody,

00:31:25.014 --> 00:31:28.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, a higher court changes the precedent or a statute is written.

00:31:28.814 --> 00:31:32.914
<v Jacob Paulsen>So there's that. And there's a third version. And this is one that we absolutely

00:31:32.914 --> 00:31:36.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>see with plenty of regularity. Those are states that have just nothing.

00:31:37.221 --> 00:31:40.921
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's no law that says you have to retreat, and so therefore you don't have to.

00:31:41.321 --> 00:31:44.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's no law that says you don't have to retreat. There's no court case that

00:31:44.661 --> 00:31:48.481
<v Jacob Paulsen>says you didn't have to retreat. It's just the absence of a requirement makes it not exist.

00:31:48.721 --> 00:31:48.981
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:31:49.621 --> 00:31:52.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just we're quiet on the subject, therefore it's not a requirement. Right.

00:31:54.481 --> 00:31:58.061
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we could debate over whether there's pros or cons there.

00:31:58.321 --> 00:32:02.841
<v Jacob Paulsen>I would rather be in a state that has a statutory clarity of you do not have to retreat.

00:32:03.061 --> 00:32:06.441
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. And if I don't have that, then my second choice would be a state that

00:32:06.441 --> 00:32:10.161
<v Jacob Paulsen>we have a court precedent that says there's no requirement to retreat.

00:32:10.241 --> 00:32:15.141
<v Riley Bowman>Where case law essentially establishes that as opposed to a state that says

00:32:15.141 --> 00:32:16.221
<v Riley Bowman>nothing about the matter.

00:32:16.301 --> 00:32:20.281
<v Riley Bowman>Right. Because that could create some ambiguity potentially in a case.

00:32:20.361 --> 00:32:22.301
<v Jacob Paulsen>You might be the one setting the court precedent in your state.

00:32:22.381 --> 00:32:26.841
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Right. Right. Yeah, no, that's well explained. And I appreciate you explaining

00:32:26.841 --> 00:32:32.001
<v Riley Bowman>kind of those different categories of states that have those kind of different

00:32:32.001 --> 00:32:34.621
<v Riley Bowman>nuanced levels of this, if you will.

00:32:36.081 --> 00:32:40.241
<v Riley Bowman>Now, if I've got my information correct here, states that do have a duty to

00:32:40.241 --> 00:32:41.901
<v Riley Bowman>retreat include Connecticut.

00:32:42.241 --> 00:32:45.261
<v Jacob Paulsen>Hold on. Let me let me I'm going to reconcile your list with my list.

00:32:45.401 --> 00:32:46.441
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. Yep. All right. Go ahead.

00:32:46.961 --> 00:32:52.621
<v Riley Bowman>Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts.

00:32:54.261 --> 00:32:59.101
<v Riley Bowman>Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island.

00:33:00.201 --> 00:33:00.841
<v Jacob Paulsen>So

00:33:03.041 --> 00:33:08.321
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that's true. One that's a little bit, it's actually the most confusing one is Virginia.

00:33:08.941 --> 00:33:13.381
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we have to go read Virginia's statute because Virginia basically says you

00:33:13.381 --> 00:33:16.501
<v Jacob Paulsen>have no duty to retreat unless you made a contribution to the affray.

00:33:17.061 --> 00:33:21.101
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's their language, contribution to the affray. So

00:33:21.792 --> 00:33:25.752
<v Jacob Paulsen>So assuming you're truly an innocent party, you didn't contribute to the environment,

00:33:25.892 --> 00:33:27.172
<v Jacob Paulsen>then yes, I would say you're a standard.

00:33:27.332 --> 00:33:32.832
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we could make the argument that Virginia is a duty to retreat state if you

00:33:32.832 --> 00:33:36.952
<v Jacob Paulsen>contributed to the fray in some way. Now you need to retreat.

00:33:37.212 --> 00:33:40.752
<v Jacob Paulsen>You basically need to remove yourself and end that particular confrontation.

00:33:40.972 --> 00:33:46.072
<v Riley Bowman>Right, right. So that's that piece where – and this is also pretty much the

00:33:46.072 --> 00:33:48.872
<v Riley Bowman>case in even stand-your-ground states where – Potentially.

00:33:48.872 --> 00:33:54.292
<v Riley Bowman>If you're the initial aggressor, for instance, if you essentially started the

00:33:54.292 --> 00:34:01.492
<v Riley Bowman>fight or the altercation or whatever, that you may be forfeiting your stand-your-ground

00:34:01.492 --> 00:34:03.232
<v Riley Bowman>privileges, if you will.

00:34:03.312 --> 00:34:05.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>I wouldn't word it that way because you're suggesting one has something to do

00:34:05.872 --> 00:34:08.632
<v Jacob Paulsen>with the other. I'd say you're more forfeiting your self-defense privileges

00:34:08.632 --> 00:34:10.132
<v Jacob Paulsen>than your stand-your-ground privileges.

00:34:10.512 --> 00:34:15.692
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's its own independent, unique requirement for self-defense is how I think of it.

00:34:16.792 --> 00:34:20.392
<v Jacob Paulsen>But Virginia doesn't say initial aggressor in this particular law we're talking about.

00:34:20.412 --> 00:34:21.672
<v Riley Bowman>You contributed to the affray.

00:34:22.072 --> 00:34:25.532
<v Jacob Paulsen>Contribution to the affray is different than initial aggressor.

00:34:25.832 --> 00:34:31.892
<v Riley Bowman>Sure. Well, that's a, okay, so this is actually the first I'm hearing that specific Virginia example.

00:34:32.472 --> 00:34:35.312
<v Jacob Paulsen>I know these things only because I typed them in. You can find all this on our

00:34:35.312 --> 00:34:38.332
<v Jacob Paulsen>website under concealedcarry.com forward slash laws.

00:34:38.512 --> 00:34:41.852
<v Riley Bowman>Laws, yeah. Yeah, concealedcarry.com forward slash laws. You can see,

00:34:42.132 --> 00:34:49.672
<v Riley Bowman>you can look up any number of things about stand your ground, castle doctrine.

00:34:50.052 --> 00:34:52.852
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, vehicle possession, hotel possession, campus carry.

00:34:53.792 --> 00:34:54.292
<v Riley Bowman>Declare.

00:34:54.392 --> 00:34:56.192
<v Jacob Paulsen>Duty to notify law enforcement.

00:34:56.472 --> 00:34:56.712
<v Riley Bowman>Duty to notify law enforcement.

00:34:57.132 --> 00:34:59.112
<v Jacob Paulsen>Permit training requirements, all sorts of things.

00:34:59.112 --> 00:35:02.652
<v Riley Bowman>If you want to know all those different little things, which actually you should know.

00:35:02.752 --> 00:35:06.252
<v Riley Bowman>You should know them, especially for your own state. and you should know them

00:35:06.252 --> 00:35:10.652
<v Riley Bowman>for states that you visit or spend time in because really you got to abide by

00:35:10.652 --> 00:35:12.712
<v Riley Bowman>the laws of the states that you find yourself in.

00:35:13.432 --> 00:35:17.872
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's a, besides our app, the Concealed Carry Gun Tools app that has

00:35:17.872 --> 00:35:19.152
<v Riley Bowman>a lot of great information.

00:35:19.332 --> 00:35:20.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>Including this one we're talking about. Yeah.

00:35:21.052 --> 00:35:26.252
<v Riley Bowman>But also right there on concealedcarry.com forward slash laws. You can access all of the,

00:35:26.725 --> 00:35:30.625
<v Riley Bowman>so much information about this. So anyway, um, right.

00:35:30.805 --> 00:35:34.305
<v Riley Bowman>So back to, uh, duty to retreat or stand your ground.

00:35:34.485 --> 00:35:40.025
<v Riley Bowman>So the, you know, stand your ground as a, as a legal doctrine,

00:35:40.465 --> 00:35:44.785
<v Riley Bowman>especially where it exists as a statute is specifically stripping away.

00:35:45.405 --> 00:35:50.085
<v Riley Bowman>It's, it's the antithesis. It's the opposite. It's the complete polar,

00:35:50.085 --> 00:35:52.845
<v Riley Bowman>you know, opposite of duty to retreat.

00:35:53.145 --> 00:35:55.165
<v Riley Bowman>Correct. So just understand that's what it is.

00:35:55.305 --> 00:36:00.065
<v Jacob Paulsen>The law is one or the other. Like you are either a duty to retreat state or

00:36:00.065 --> 00:36:01.445
<v Jacob Paulsen>a stand your ground state. Yeah.

00:36:02.085 --> 00:36:05.825
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you're a duty to retreat state, that's by statute or by law.

00:36:05.985 --> 00:36:07.145
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've said you got to run away.

00:36:07.525 --> 00:36:10.465
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's some nuance to that we'll come back to. And if you're a stand your ground

00:36:10.465 --> 00:36:14.945
<v Jacob Paulsen>state, then we're saying you don't got to run away either by statute,

00:36:15.145 --> 00:36:18.605
<v Jacob Paulsen>by court precedent, or just by the absence of a duty to retreat.

00:36:19.442 --> 00:36:23.362
<v Riley Bowman>So where do people get it wrong? Like, cause again, so often like people sort

00:36:23.362 --> 00:36:27.342
<v Riley Bowman>of like hang their, their, their hats on the stand your ground,

00:36:27.482 --> 00:36:29.002
<v Riley Bowman>like, ah, stand your ground.

00:36:29.162 --> 00:36:34.362
<v Riley Bowman>You know, it's thrown out there as this common, I mean, we, we see it not just

00:36:34.362 --> 00:36:40.542
<v Riley Bowman>in our social media comments on our posts, but we see a news media frequently,

00:36:40.942 --> 00:36:42.682
<v Riley Bowman>frequently, uh, use it incorrectly.

00:36:42.822 --> 00:36:48.202
<v Riley Bowman>We even see law enforcement, uh, you know, sheriffs and police chiefs all the

00:36:48.202 --> 00:36:52.002
<v Riley Bowman>time, you You know, like, well, this is a stand your ground case when it is clearly not.

00:36:53.282 --> 00:36:56.342
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think before we answer that, and that's going to be like probably the most

00:36:56.342 --> 00:36:59.122
<v Jacob Paulsen>valuable part of this episode, but we do have to clarify castle doctrine.

00:36:59.602 --> 00:37:00.742
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. Okay. Yeah, fair enough.

00:37:00.762 --> 00:37:03.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is part of the definition of understanding, like the broad understanding

00:37:03.622 --> 00:37:04.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>of stand your ground. Yep.

00:37:05.502 --> 00:37:09.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>So castle doctrine is another, you know, good gold cliche term we throw around a lot.

00:37:09.782 --> 00:37:13.762
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact, speaking of it getting overused, this is another one of those that

00:37:13.762 --> 00:37:17.942
<v Jacob Paulsen>people are like, you just insert here if something to do with house is involved.

00:37:18.202 --> 00:37:18.382
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:37:18.622 --> 00:37:23.042
<v Jacob Paulsen>But Castle Doctrine is basically the absence of a duty to retreat inside your

00:37:23.042 --> 00:37:26.842
<v Jacob Paulsen>home or habitation or dwelling or however any given state might define that,

00:37:26.982 --> 00:37:31.282
<v Jacob Paulsen>which definition could go so far as to include your vehicle. So –

00:37:32.496 --> 00:37:38.696
<v Jacob Paulsen>A castle doctrine-type law is unnecessary in a stand-your-ground state.

00:37:38.856 --> 00:37:40.876
<v Jacob Paulsen>You and I are in a stand-your-ground state. Here in Colorado,

00:37:41.016 --> 00:37:42.296
<v Jacob Paulsen>this is a stand-your-ground state.

00:37:42.436 --> 00:37:48.256
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so we don't need a castle doctrine law because we already don't have a duty to retreat.

00:37:48.656 --> 00:37:55.156
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it would be superfluous to pass some castle doctrine-like statute in a state

00:37:55.156 --> 00:38:00.756
<v Jacob Paulsen>that already has a stand-your-ground law or policy or whatever you want to call it.

00:38:01.376 --> 00:38:05.776
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we have to isolate this down to the 12 jurisdictions, the 12 states, right?

00:38:06.756 --> 00:38:09.956
<v Jacob Paulsen>Not the 39 that are standard ground states, but the other 12,

00:38:10.276 --> 00:38:13.916
<v Jacob Paulsen>including DC. DC is not one of the 12, but DC making us 51, not 50.

00:38:14.216 --> 00:38:18.456
<v Jacob Paulsen>The other 12 states that are duty to treat states, those are states where a

00:38:18.456 --> 00:38:22.036
<v Jacob Paulsen>castle doctrine law would be relevant or applicable or helpful.

00:38:22.176 --> 00:38:25.336
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because if you're in a state that does have duty to treat, one of the ones that

00:38:25.336 --> 00:38:29.876
<v Jacob Paulsen>rightly read, now having a castle doctrine means, okay, in this state,

00:38:29.976 --> 00:38:32.836
<v Jacob Paulsen>you do have a duty to have to retreat, if safely able, with the other innocent parties.

00:38:33.676 --> 00:38:37.376
<v Jacob Paulsen>But if you're in your home, you don't have to retreat.

00:38:37.716 --> 00:38:42.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>So outside the home you do, inside the home you don't. And that's what castle

00:38:42.116 --> 00:38:46.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>doctrine does, is it removes the otherwise existing duty to retreat when you're

00:38:46.116 --> 00:38:49.616
<v Jacob Paulsen>inside your dwelling or habitation or whatever term that particular law might use.

00:38:49.796 --> 00:38:54.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we have only 12 states where we care whether or not they have a castle doctrine.

00:38:54.816 --> 00:38:57.156
<v Jacob Paulsen>And as it were, all 12 do.

00:38:58.616 --> 00:39:00.096
<v Jacob Paulsen>So putting it differently.

00:39:00.696 --> 00:39:05.316
<v Riley Bowman>Isn't it that virtually every state has so-called, quote-unquote,

00:39:05.476 --> 00:39:06.976
<v Riley Bowman>castle doctrine to some degree?

00:39:07.316 --> 00:39:10.736
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, in Colorado, we don't. We don't have a law that says you don't have to retreat in your home.

00:39:12.178 --> 00:39:17.318
<v Riley Bowman>Well, it doesn't say anything about that. But what I mean is effectively,

00:39:17.318 --> 00:39:23.618
<v Riley Bowman>like virtually every state, I mean, is there any one state that requires you to retreat?

00:39:23.678 --> 00:39:25.418
<v Jacob Paulsen>That would be the best way to summarize this.

00:39:25.418 --> 00:39:26.178
<v Riley Bowman>There you go. Yes.

00:39:26.378 --> 00:39:30.438
<v Jacob Paulsen>So no. The answer is no. Nowhere in this country do you have a duty to retreat

00:39:30.438 --> 00:39:32.778
<v Jacob Paulsen>inside your home dwelling habitation.

00:39:33.158 --> 00:39:36.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>It just doesn't exist. In 39 states, it doesn't exist because you have no such

00:39:36.838 --> 00:39:37.698
<v Jacob Paulsen>duty to retreat anywhere.

00:39:37.918 --> 00:39:40.698
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. So the home is just part of anywhere, so it doesn't matter.

00:39:40.698 --> 00:39:43.618
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then in the other 12 states where you do have a duty to retreat,

00:39:43.878 --> 00:39:49.318
<v Jacob Paulsen>we remove or eliminate that duty when in the home with the castle doctrine type law.

00:39:49.518 --> 00:39:52.938
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, that's what I was getting at. Yeah. And that's important to,

00:39:53.098 --> 00:39:56.738
<v Riley Bowman>I think, call out. But now here's the thing, and this is where I'm going to start.

00:39:56.918 --> 00:40:00.878
<v Riley Bowman>And I appreciate you making sure we define castle doctrine as part of this discussion

00:40:00.878 --> 00:40:06.978
<v Riley Bowman>because really these are two doctrines that both deal with duty to retreat.

00:40:06.978 --> 00:40:10.958
<v Riley Bowman>And you just clarified it very well in that in all the states that effectively

00:40:10.958 --> 00:40:15.098
<v Riley Bowman>have Stand Your Ground, they also have Castle Doctrine.

00:40:15.218 --> 00:40:17.618
<v Riley Bowman>But in states that do not have Stand Your Ground...

00:40:18.732 --> 00:40:22.172
<v Riley Bowman>They may have a castle doctrine statute. No, you said that backwards.

00:40:22.172 --> 00:40:24.392
<v Riley Bowman>Hold on, I said it backwards. You did. You did.

00:40:24.632 --> 00:40:31.192
<v Jacob Paulsen>So in states that have a duty to retreat, all of them also have a castle doctrine.

00:40:31.252 --> 00:40:36.332
<v Riley Bowman>And castle doctrines will remove the duty to retreat when in your dwelling or

00:40:36.332 --> 00:40:37.432
<v Riley Bowman>home or whatever. Habitation.

00:40:37.972 --> 00:40:41.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those tend to be the three words we see, dwelling, habitation, and home.

00:40:43.092 --> 00:40:46.972
<v Jacob Paulsen>But with me, a little bit, and there's some nuance there because those 12 states,

00:40:47.172 --> 00:40:50.172
<v Jacob Paulsen>the way they write the castle doctrine, It would get really important if you

00:40:50.172 --> 00:40:53.532
<v Jacob Paulsen>lived in one of those states because whether or not curtilage matters,

00:40:53.772 --> 00:40:56.992
<v Jacob Paulsen>whether or not some extension part of your property or yard matters,

00:40:57.172 --> 00:41:01.572
<v Jacob Paulsen>whether or not your vehicle is an extension of the home in that particular context.

00:41:01.752 --> 00:41:04.752
<v Jacob Paulsen>I really actually hate the phrase extension of your home. But in that particular

00:41:04.752 --> 00:41:11.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>context, some states would extend the castle doctrine privileges into your vehicle.

00:41:12.752 --> 00:41:16.372
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those would be nuanced things that you would want to know if you lived in one of those 12 states.

00:41:16.932 --> 00:41:22.172
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, yeah, okay. Okay. Very good clarification. So now kind of transitioning

00:41:22.172 --> 00:41:25.552
<v Riley Bowman>back to that question that I was asking a moment ago is where do people get it wrong?

00:41:25.572 --> 00:41:32.272
<v Riley Bowman>Because what we see so frequently is that, and I'm going to say this about both

00:41:32.272 --> 00:41:37.632
<v Riley Bowman>castle doctrine and stand your ground, is that they get used as catch-all phrases

00:41:37.632 --> 00:41:39.852
<v Riley Bowman>to just sort of mean self-defense.

00:41:40.812 --> 00:41:45.032
<v Riley Bowman>And it's sort of like, I can do whatever I want. Yes. You know? Yeah.

00:41:45.392 --> 00:41:47.052
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, you're dead on. That's exactly what happens.

00:41:47.052 --> 00:41:48.592
<v Riley Bowman>It's a license to, you know.

00:41:48.792 --> 00:41:51.972
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, because if we're talking about, when you say how do people get Stand Your

00:41:51.972 --> 00:41:54.272
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ground wrong, there's really two ways to take the question.

00:41:54.952 --> 00:41:57.052
<v Jacob Paulsen>Again, this is Amelia Bedelia Jacob over here.

00:41:58.162 --> 00:42:02.462
<v Jacob Paulsen>I would love, actually, comments from people. Do you have any idea who Amelia

00:42:02.462 --> 00:42:05.342
<v Jacob Paulsen>Bedelia is? Is that a reference that is completely lost?

00:42:05.502 --> 00:42:07.122
<v Riley Bowman>I'm sure it's lost on many today.

00:42:07.642 --> 00:42:12.102
<v Jacob Paulsen>My kids would be like, Amelia, what? So I'm a very literal person.

00:42:12.342 --> 00:42:15.642
<v Jacob Paulsen>So just to be clear, when you say, how do people get Stand Your Ground wrong?

00:42:15.662 --> 00:42:16.922
<v Jacob Paulsen>You could be asking two questions.

00:42:17.142 --> 00:42:21.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>One would be sort of like, how do gun owners get in trouble because they fail

00:42:21.322 --> 00:42:26.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>to abide by that? By stand your ground regulate, or in this case,

00:42:26.542 --> 00:42:28.222
<v Jacob Paulsen>really duty to retreat requirements.

00:42:28.502 --> 00:42:33.362
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the other way to look at this, like, how does the public at large just misuse

00:42:33.362 --> 00:42:36.082
<v Jacob Paulsen>the term stand your ground? I think that's where you're going.

00:42:36.302 --> 00:42:40.062
<v Riley Bowman>Well, and the reason I'm going there is because that's where the getting it

00:42:40.062 --> 00:42:46.442
<v Riley Bowman>wrong in the act part, you know, on the action side of the equation starts is

00:42:46.442 --> 00:42:49.122
<v Riley Bowman>just a complete misunderstanding of what any of that means.

00:42:49.222 --> 00:42:52.842
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, 100%. So I think that's where we start is talking about like when people

00:42:52.842 --> 00:42:58.882
<v Riley Bowman>throw out these terms, stand your ground, you know, castle doctrine, make my day.

00:43:00.022 --> 00:43:02.082
<v Riley Bowman>Like, again, they're kind of

00:43:02.082 --> 00:43:07.622
<v Riley Bowman>using it in this very broad sort of like this license to dole out justice.

00:43:07.942 --> 00:43:09.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, Florida screwed this up, in my opinion.

00:43:10.982 --> 00:43:16.922
<v Riley Bowman>And they were one of the early states that enshrined this in statute. Yes. And that, yeah.

00:43:16.922 --> 00:43:19.082
<v Jacob Paulsen>And when they did it, they screwed it up for the rest of us.

00:43:19.282 --> 00:43:23.922
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because what happened is at the time, Florida passed two self-defense related laws.

00:43:24.762 --> 00:43:28.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>And one of them is the stand your ground provision that says you don't have a duty to retreat.

00:43:29.242 --> 00:43:33.482
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the other law that was passed at the same time is a self-defense immunity law.

00:43:34.225 --> 00:43:40.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>That law basically says that before you go to court to hear charges against

00:43:40.645 --> 00:43:43.885
<v Jacob Paulsen>you, you can appear before a judge with no jury present.

00:43:44.145 --> 00:43:48.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in a hearing with the judge, the judge can hear the evidence presented by

00:43:48.645 --> 00:43:49.885
<v Jacob Paulsen>the prosecutor and by the defendant.

00:43:50.105 --> 00:43:53.745
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if the judge determines that this is clearly self-defense,

00:43:54.025 --> 00:43:59.005
<v Jacob Paulsen>then the judge can basically declare you immune from prosecution and civil liability.

00:43:59.625 --> 00:44:05.225
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's sort of a way for a judge to kind of preempt it, nip it in the butt

00:44:05.225 --> 00:44:08.485
<v Jacob Paulsen>in advance and be like, we're not going to deal with all the drama of a trial.

00:44:08.825 --> 00:44:12.805
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact, we're not going to let people even sue this guy because this is clearly self-defense.

00:44:13.005 --> 00:44:19.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this self-defense immunity concept statute was passed at the same time as

00:44:19.645 --> 00:44:21.145
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Stand Your Ground provision in Florida.

00:44:21.385 --> 00:44:25.185
<v Jacob Paulsen>They were passed together in a single session.

00:44:25.425 --> 00:44:27.205
<v Riley Bowman>As a package. As a package, yes.

00:44:27.285 --> 00:44:29.765
<v Jacob Paulsen>Thank you. Well said. That's the word I was looking for. And so what happened

00:44:29.765 --> 00:44:35.925
<v Jacob Paulsen>at the time is the media reported on this package of law as a stand your ground provision.

00:44:36.385 --> 00:44:39.685
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, oh, stand your ground, like Florida's passed stand your ground.

00:44:39.685 --> 00:44:44.905
<v Jacob Paulsen>It means that you can't be tried. You can't be sued for self-defense.

00:44:45.105 --> 00:44:50.025
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the association, the incorrect association of the phrase stand your ground,

00:44:50.205 --> 00:44:53.925
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think, got screwed up first and foremost because of Florida.

00:44:54.285 --> 00:44:57.785
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. There's another kind of aspect to this as well, I think,

00:44:57.905 --> 00:45:03.825
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob, that has sort of morphed the doctrine of stand your ground into this broader,

00:45:04.125 --> 00:45:09.665
<v Riley Bowman>you know, it's sort of like people think that stand your ground means or gave

00:45:09.665 --> 00:45:13.485
<v Riley Bowman>the law passed that created stand your ground,

00:45:13.485 --> 00:45:19.825
<v Riley Bowman>created the ability to use a gun in self-defense outside the home.

00:45:19.905 --> 00:45:26.325
<v Riley Bowman>Sure. And why I think this gets kind of roped up in that a little bit is historically,

00:45:26.605 --> 00:45:30.265
<v Riley Bowman>when we look at kind of the timing of everything, is when Stand Your Ground

00:45:30.265 --> 00:45:31.585
<v Riley Bowman>became the law in Florida.

00:45:32.497 --> 00:45:39.377
<v Riley Bowman>And then in some other select states, it was also during kind of this huge surge

00:45:39.377 --> 00:45:44.857
<v Riley Bowman>in states adopting concealed carry laws as well and issuing permits.

00:45:45.297 --> 00:45:50.817
<v Riley Bowman>And so now you start to see, because before that, it was far less common that

00:45:50.817 --> 00:45:55.317
<v Riley Bowman>you had people carrying guns outside of the home and using them in self-defense

00:45:55.317 --> 00:45:57.417
<v Riley Bowman>outside of the home, right?

00:45:57.417 --> 00:46:01.937
<v Riley Bowman>And so I think in a lot of people's minds, historically, they sort of like,

00:46:02.017 --> 00:46:03.997
<v Riley Bowman>stand your ground. I remember that was a big thing.

00:46:04.157 --> 00:46:09.317
<v Riley Bowman>And around that same time, people actually carrying guns on their person outside

00:46:09.317 --> 00:46:12.957
<v Riley Bowman>the home for personal defense also is becoming a thing.

00:46:13.317 --> 00:46:18.517
<v Riley Bowman>And so sort of like lump that all together, that stand your ground means my

00:46:18.517 --> 00:46:22.097
<v Riley Bowman>right and privilege to use a gun and defend myself outside the home.

00:46:22.377 --> 00:46:25.037
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I think you're not wrong. In fact, I'm going to do an experiment right

00:46:25.037 --> 00:46:28.197
<v Jacob Paulsen>now. I'm going to open chat GPT on my phone.

00:46:28.417 --> 00:46:28.697
<v Riley Bowman>All right.

00:46:29.217 --> 00:46:38.157
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I'm going to type, did stand your ground law play a part of

00:46:39.780 --> 00:46:48.800
<v Jacob Paulsen>In the George Zimmerman, because this is a Florida case, the George Zimmerman incident.

00:46:50.900 --> 00:46:53.680
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, the correct answer to this, I'm not looking at the answer,

00:46:53.900 --> 00:46:56.780
<v Jacob Paulsen>I have my phone turned upside down, but the correct answer to this is no.

00:46:56.860 --> 00:46:57.000
<v Riley Bowman>No.

00:46:57.340 --> 00:47:02.800
<v Jacob Paulsen>It didn't. Like when someone is straddling you on the ground and beating your

00:47:02.800 --> 00:47:07.100
<v Jacob Paulsen>head into the concrete, whether or not you have a duty to retreat is irrelevant.

00:47:07.380 --> 00:47:09.040
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. Because they're on you.

00:47:09.240 --> 00:47:09.620
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:47:09.780 --> 00:47:16.300
<v Jacob Paulsen>Holding you against the ground, right? So it is absolutely, unquestionably not relevant.

00:47:17.040 --> 00:47:23.480
<v Riley Bowman>Forces already, like, very serious force is already being used on you at that

00:47:23.480 --> 00:47:24.740
<v Riley Bowman>point as well. So, yeah, yeah.

00:47:24.940 --> 00:47:26.520
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay, here's Chad GPT's response.

00:47:26.720 --> 00:47:27.140
<v Riley Bowman>All right, let's hear it.

00:47:27.560 --> 00:47:31.220
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes, Florida Stand Your Ground law did play a role in the legal process surrounding

00:47:31.220 --> 00:47:34.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Georgia Zimmerman shooting at Trayvon Martin, but not in the way most people assume.

00:47:36.341 --> 00:47:39.941
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay, go on. It says, what Stand Your Ground actually does? Florida's Stand

00:47:39.941 --> 00:47:42.541
<v Jacob Paulsen>Your Ground law removes the duty to retreat before using deadly force.

00:47:43.321 --> 00:47:45.261
<v Jacob Paulsen>Good job, Chet. Yeah. Not bad.

00:47:45.721 --> 00:47:45.861
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:47:46.261 --> 00:47:48.881
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then it says, if you're in a place you have a legal right to be and you

00:47:48.881 --> 00:47:51.201
<v Jacob Paulsen>reasonably believe deadly force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily

00:47:51.201 --> 00:47:53.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>harm. That's true. That's basically what the Florida statute says. Yep.

00:47:53.961 --> 00:47:57.521
<v Jacob Paulsen>It also provides a pretrial immunity hearing option, meaning a defendant can

00:47:57.521 --> 00:48:01.361
<v Jacob Paulsen>try to avoid trial entirely. It does not. That's a different statute.

00:48:02.261 --> 00:48:05.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's not quite accurate. Did Zimmerman use Stand Your Ground as a defense?

00:48:05.721 --> 00:48:08.881
<v Jacob Paulsen>No at trial, he did not rely on stand your ground. He did not request a stand

00:48:08.881 --> 00:48:09.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>your ground immunity hearing.

00:48:09.961 --> 00:48:13.021
<v Jacob Paulsen>His legal team instead argued traditional self-defense.

00:48:16.821 --> 00:48:21.421
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'd say AI did okay on this. I was actually hoping it would fail bigger than

00:48:21.421 --> 00:48:23.821
<v Jacob Paulsen>that. So that I could make fun of it some more.

00:48:23.961 --> 00:48:27.621
<v Riley Bowman>If I was rating it out of five, I'd get four out of five or 4.5 out of five.

00:48:27.621 --> 00:48:32.801
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, not bad. The jury instructions did include no duty to retreat language.

00:48:33.881 --> 00:48:37.021
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay. The jurors were told Zimmerman did not have to retreat.

00:48:39.501 --> 00:48:45.181
<v Riley Bowman>Chad's answering it from this perspective. It played a role in that it didn't.

00:48:45.181 --> 00:48:45.861
<v Jacob Paulsen>Play a role.

00:48:46.441 --> 00:48:48.061
<v Riley Bowman>It had to come up.

00:48:48.221 --> 00:48:52.441
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, I thought I was setting up AI for failure, and I was going to make fun of it completely.

00:48:52.661 --> 00:48:58.021
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it actually did a pretty good job. So props to whoever programmed Chad on that one.

00:48:58.381 --> 00:48:59.061
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, no.

00:48:59.241 --> 00:49:02.141
<v Jacob Paulsen>But yeah, we see it screw up all the time. Yeah.

00:49:03.600 --> 00:49:09.300
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I know we have some examples, some specific incidents that it should or didn't come up in.

00:49:09.620 --> 00:49:13.520
<v Riley Bowman>So the big takeaway from this, and this is kind of where I was going with this

00:49:13.520 --> 00:49:19.580
<v Riley Bowman>last little discussion, is that stand your ground is not the law that gives

00:49:19.580 --> 00:49:22.140
<v Riley Bowman>you the right to self-defense. No.

00:49:22.800 --> 00:49:26.480
<v Riley Bowman>That always existed. It already existed.

00:49:26.800 --> 00:49:33.380
<v Riley Bowman>Okay? you may not have had depending on your state the ability to carry a gun

00:49:33.380 --> 00:49:38.600
<v Riley Bowman>on your person especially concealed up to a certain point you know two three

00:49:38.600 --> 00:49:44.000
<v Riley Bowman>whatever decades ago but you always had the right to,

00:49:44.640 --> 00:49:50.800
<v Riley Bowman>use self defense right it still had to be reasonable proportional you couldn't

00:49:50.800 --> 00:49:56.920
<v Riley Bowman>be the initial aggressor you still had to meet all these other legal you know,

00:49:57.020 --> 00:49:58.180
<v Riley Bowman>principles and requirements.

00:49:58.560 --> 00:50:01.780
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. All that always and already did exist.

00:50:02.400 --> 00:50:08.920
<v Riley Bowman>Stand Your Ground just came out to clarify and put a provision in statute that says,

00:50:09.540 --> 00:50:15.620
<v Riley Bowman>hey, in some instances or in some cases or in some locations or some states,

00:50:15.860 --> 00:50:21.640
<v Riley Bowman>there was this duty to retreat piece that was like one of those legal requirements. That's gone.

00:50:21.960 --> 00:50:25.740
<v Riley Bowman>That's it. It didn't change anything else about self-defense.

00:50:26.060 --> 00:50:26.160
<v Jacob Paulsen>Nope.

00:50:26.763 --> 00:50:31.323
<v Riley Bowman>And that's what I think is really key for people to understand so that they

00:50:31.323 --> 00:50:35.403
<v Riley Bowman>know, hey, when we talk about Stand Your Ground, what we are actually talking

00:50:35.403 --> 00:50:38.923
<v Riley Bowman>about, when we talk about it, and when intelligent people talk about it,

00:50:39.063 --> 00:50:41.583
<v Riley Bowman>we are talking simply about the removal of duty to retreat.

00:50:41.583 --> 00:50:46.663
<v Riley Bowman>When you hear it used in the media and by your local sheriff that's doing a

00:50:46.663 --> 00:50:51.543
<v Riley Bowman>press conference that I'm sorry, sheriffs, I mean, not all of them are disclueless,

00:50:51.703 --> 00:50:54.203
<v Riley Bowman>but there I've seen some press conferences that I'm just like,

00:50:54.423 --> 00:50:57.063
<v Riley Bowman>oh my goodness, they don't understand what the actual law means.

00:50:57.323 --> 00:50:57.923
<v Jacob Paulsen>They have no idea what they're saying.

00:50:58.183 --> 00:51:00.643
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, that's what we mean when we talk about stand your ground.

00:51:01.423 --> 00:51:04.463
<v Jacob Paulsen>No duty to retreat. In fact, I often think of castle doctrine.

00:51:04.603 --> 00:51:05.783
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just partial stand your ground.

00:51:06.143 --> 00:51:06.943
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. But that's, you know.

00:51:07.023 --> 00:51:09.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's just like limited to stand your ground. It's limited. It's just limited

00:51:09.283 --> 00:51:11.823
<v Jacob Paulsen>to your Yeah, that's a good

00:51:11.823 --> 00:51:16.083
<v Riley Bowman>Way of defining that as well. So I think at this point, I think we've defined

00:51:16.083 --> 00:51:17.623
<v Riley Bowman>it pretty well. We've talked about the context.

00:51:17.723 --> 00:51:20.543
<v Riley Bowman>I think it's good to probably talk about some specific examples.

00:51:20.963 --> 00:51:23.303
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, okay. How about Draca?

00:51:23.763 --> 00:51:27.683
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, that's one I was referencing towards the beginning of the episode.

00:51:27.823 --> 00:51:30.843
<v Riley Bowman>Hey, stick around because you're going to hear us talk about this.

00:51:30.923 --> 00:51:32.663
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, this was a huge case.

00:51:32.823 --> 00:51:35.643
<v Riley Bowman>It got a lot of media attention. We've talked about it before on the podcast.

00:51:35.643 --> 00:51:37.323
<v Riley Bowman>It's been a while. This has been a couple of years ago.

00:51:37.803 --> 00:51:41.543
<v Riley Bowman>But uh the the michael draka case out of florida which.

00:51:41.543 --> 00:51:43.803
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ironically is a case that had nothing to do with stand your ground

00:51:43.803 --> 00:51:49.863
<v Riley Bowman>And that's why this is a great example because because people kept saying stand

00:51:49.863 --> 00:51:53.483
<v Riley Bowman>your ground stand your ground like that's all i heard in the media for like months oh.

00:51:53.483 --> 00:51:57.963
<v Jacob Paulsen>The prosecutor refused to prosecute stating they couldn't because it was a stand your

00:51:57.963 --> 00:52:03.683
<v Riley Bowman>Ground yeah this is an example of a prosecutor didn't understand yeah so stand your ground meant so.

00:52:03.683 --> 00:52:06.103
<v Jacob Paulsen>Let's talk about what happened in this incident this is one that's come up on

00:52:06.103 --> 00:52:10.383
<v Jacob Paulsen>our podcast several times. It's one that we often use as kind of an example in some of these things.

00:52:10.603 --> 00:52:14.663
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in this particular incident is a really good example of the legal doctrine

00:52:14.663 --> 00:52:19.983
<v Jacob Paulsen>of imminence, but it's also an example of the public or, and not just the public,

00:52:20.143 --> 00:52:22.343
<v Jacob Paulsen>the people who matter, misunderstandings to end your ground.

00:52:23.217 --> 00:52:28.677
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we got some people who have gone to the gas station, and they've parked in

00:52:28.677 --> 00:52:30.157
<v Jacob Paulsen>the handicapped parking spot.

00:52:30.337 --> 00:52:30.457
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:52:30.737 --> 00:52:34.637
<v Jacob Paulsen>But presumably they're not handicapped. They have no placard to indicate as

00:52:34.637 --> 00:52:36.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>much. They're not, you know, et cetera.

00:52:37.277 --> 00:52:43.597
<v Jacob Paulsen>And Michael Draca, the handicapped parking police guy, in his own mind.

00:52:43.757 --> 00:52:43.977
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:52:44.657 --> 00:52:48.917
<v Jacob Paulsen>He goes to the gas station, and he sees this car sitting in the handicapped

00:52:48.917 --> 00:52:53.297
<v Jacob Paulsen>spot, and the passenger seat is occupied by a female adult

00:52:53.857 --> 00:52:55.957
<v Jacob Paulsen>and he decides that he needs to

00:52:55.957 --> 00:53:00.217
<v Jacob Paulsen>do his thing and yell at this person for occupying this handicapped spot.

00:53:00.397 --> 00:53:01.857
<v Riley Bowman>How dare you park there?

00:53:02.137 --> 00:53:07.357
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Which, by the way, that's a dick move. Stop parking in handicapped spots

00:53:07.357 --> 00:53:08.197
<v Jacob Paulsen>if you're not handicapped.

00:53:08.577 --> 00:53:11.897
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's not okay. Drake is not wrong. Don't do that crap.

00:53:12.137 --> 00:53:17.597
<v Riley Bowman>People understand that intent that he had as far as like,

00:53:17.597 --> 00:53:20.237
<v Riley Bowman>you know he he witnessed an injustice and by

00:53:20.237 --> 00:53:22.977
<v Riley Bowman>the way there was a history of this in fact it came

00:53:22.977 --> 00:53:26.057
<v Riley Bowman>up in in trial uh that more than once

00:53:26.057 --> 00:53:29.957
<v Riley Bowman>i think there were at least two other times before this

00:53:29.957 --> 00:53:35.697
<v Riley Bowman>fateful day that he had accosted somebody at that same gas station uh about

00:53:35.697 --> 00:53:41.277
<v Riley Bowman>the same issue now he also i think had uh some limited mobility or some kind

00:53:41.277 --> 00:53:46.317
<v Riley Bowman>of minor handicap issue I don't know if he himself had a handicapped placard or anything.

00:53:46.537 --> 00:53:50.617
<v Riley Bowman>I just know that he had, what I recall is there was some limited mobility on his part.

00:53:50.737 --> 00:53:55.597
<v Riley Bowman>And I think that he just took this issue very personally that that's a handicapped spot.

00:53:56.197 --> 00:53:59.917
<v Riley Bowman>If you are not, if you don't have that placard, that license plate,

00:54:00.077 --> 00:54:01.557
<v Riley Bowman>whatever, you do not park there.

00:54:01.797 --> 00:54:05.397
<v Riley Bowman>And this was a justice that he decided he needed to take action on.

00:54:05.617 --> 00:54:11.657
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's right. So he's yelling at the female adult occupant when said female

00:54:11.657 --> 00:54:16.137
<v Jacob Paulsen>adult occupant of the car's boyfriend, male driver of the car,

00:54:16.337 --> 00:54:17.817
<v Jacob Paulsen>comes out of the gas station.

00:54:18.724 --> 00:54:23.564
<v Jacob Paulsen>And decides he doesn't like that that old dude over there is yelling at his girl.

00:54:24.064 --> 00:54:25.944
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Nobody would, right?

00:54:26.044 --> 00:54:29.844
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. No, that's not cool. So he basically body checks him.

00:54:30.104 --> 00:54:30.324
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:54:30.684 --> 00:54:33.624
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this is all on camera. So we have, I mean, there's no audio.

00:54:33.624 --> 00:54:37.024
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I don't know who's saying what. Yeah, it's an

00:54:37.024 --> 00:54:39.504
<v Riley Bowman>Exterior camera on the convenience store. Right.

00:54:39.504 --> 00:54:43.624
<v Jacob Paulsen>But he body checks. He comes out the door. He sees Draco doing his thing.

00:54:43.744 --> 00:54:46.864
<v Jacob Paulsen>And he runs over and it's like, pop. I really just, he body checks him.

00:54:46.864 --> 00:54:51.124
<v Jacob Paulsen>And drake goes like right to the ground didn't see it coming complete ambush

00:54:51.124 --> 00:54:52.864
<v Jacob Paulsen>got him by surprise yeah drake's

00:54:52.864 --> 00:54:57.484
<v Riley Bowman>Attention is still on the girlfriend he's kind of turned like this and uh and

00:54:57.484 --> 00:55:02.124
<v Riley Bowman>it's his name is marquise uh marquise mclochten is the is the victim in this

00:55:02.124 --> 00:55:06.884
<v Riley Bowman>case yeah he comes out and kind of from drake's left bam hits him so yeah he

00:55:06.884 --> 00:55:08.444
<v Riley Bowman>goes right down body checks him good yep.

00:55:08.444 --> 00:55:11.924
<v Jacob Paulsen>So drake is on the ground now yeah and in

00:55:11.924 --> 00:55:15.844
<v Jacob Paulsen>pretty short order while his presumed

00:55:15.844 --> 00:55:18.664
<v Jacob Paulsen>attacker is kind of standing and staring at him like do

00:55:18.664 --> 00:55:23.564
<v Jacob Paulsen>you want to get up for some more draca draws his gun yeah while he's still on

00:55:23.564 --> 00:55:27.804
<v Jacob Paulsen>the ground his back is on the ground his butt cheeks are touching the asphalt

00:55:27.804 --> 00:55:31.344
<v Jacob Paulsen>and he draws his gun it points it uh what'd you guys say what'd you say the

00:55:31.344 --> 00:55:37.324
<v Jacob Paulsen>guy's name was marquise marquise and so So Marquise decides that body checking

00:55:37.324 --> 00:55:38.644
<v Jacob Paulsen>people is all fine and good,

00:55:38.804 --> 00:55:41.844
<v Jacob Paulsen>but getting shots, not something he has any interest in.

00:55:42.004 --> 00:55:42.124
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:55:42.464 --> 00:55:47.424
<v Jacob Paulsen>So he kind of puts his hands up in the good old surrender move and starts to step backward.

00:55:47.724 --> 00:55:47.864
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:55:48.064 --> 00:55:51.504
<v Jacob Paulsen>And makes it a deliberate intent to disengage.

00:55:51.824 --> 00:55:52.084
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:55:52.324 --> 00:55:57.544
<v Jacob Paulsen>And as he's in the act of this disengagement, hands up, stepping back,

00:55:58.184 --> 00:56:00.304
<v Jacob Paulsen>Draco decides, now, bang.

00:56:00.424 --> 00:56:00.564
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:56:01.953 --> 00:56:07.793
<v Riley Bowman>Well, frankly, I think that he had made the decision to pull the trigger at

00:56:07.793 --> 00:56:10.293
<v Riley Bowman>the moment he started drawing the gun.

00:56:10.433 --> 00:56:14.553
<v Jacob Paulsen>But he hesitated. I mean, there's clear hesitation. Like the gun is out and

00:56:14.553 --> 00:56:19.173
<v Jacob Paulsen>presented to target, and the amount of time elapses before he presses the trigger.

00:56:19.173 --> 00:56:21.093
<v Riley Bowman>I don't know if that's decisional time or.

00:56:21.093 --> 00:56:23.413
<v Jacob Paulsen>If that's… Just how long it takes him to press the trigger.

00:56:23.573 --> 00:56:26.413
<v Riley Bowman>How long? Yeah. I mean, come on. You've worked with me on the range.

00:56:26.673 --> 00:56:31.613
<v Jacob Paulsen>It could be unclear from the camera angle. but to me it looks like hesitation

00:56:31.613 --> 00:56:34.913
<v Jacob Paulsen>and if I was on the jury I would have said that looks like he hesitated

00:56:36.173 --> 00:56:40.333
<v Jacob Paulsen>but certainly the trigger is not pressed until such time that the man has his

00:56:40.333 --> 00:56:43.593
<v Jacob Paulsen>hands up in a surrender position and is retreating yeah

00:56:43.593 --> 00:56:47.213
<v Riley Bowman>He takes one or two steps to the rear it's not like a ton of.

00:56:47.813 --> 00:56:48.773
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it

00:56:48.773 --> 00:56:55.133
<v Riley Bowman>Is apparent he's no longer over top of Draca he's no longer he is not pursuing

00:56:55.133 --> 00:56:57.133
<v Riley Bowman>anything he's doing this,

00:56:57.853 --> 00:57:03.913
<v Riley Bowman>and so So, yeah, so this is, I think, one of the most famous cases that illustrates

00:57:03.913 --> 00:57:09.033
<v Riley Bowman>this, and it illustrates it incorrectly because Stand Your Ground wasn't even...

00:57:09.033 --> 00:57:09.813
<v Jacob Paulsen>Has nothing to do with this.

00:57:09.853 --> 00:57:11.933
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, has nothing to do with this case, but that's why we're using it as an

00:57:11.933 --> 00:57:16.833
<v Riley Bowman>example. One, because, you know, so many people were like, well,

00:57:16.833 --> 00:57:20.093
<v Riley Bowman>it's a Stand Your Ground matter, you know, so we're not going to pursue charges.

00:57:20.933 --> 00:57:23.433
<v Riley Bowman>Draco probably was himself thinking, yeah, Stand Your Ground,

00:57:23.553 --> 00:57:26.473
<v Riley Bowman>you know, like, I was within my rights, you know, kind of thing.

00:57:27.933 --> 00:57:30.793
<v Riley Bowman>But that wasn't the case at all.

00:57:30.793 --> 00:57:33.273
<v Jacob Paulsen>No he's still in prison oh

00:57:33.273 --> 00:57:34.653
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah sentenced to at.

00:57:34.653 --> 00:57:38.113
<v Jacob Paulsen>Least 20 years he could be out on early parole or something but he was sentenced

00:57:38.113 --> 00:57:39.633
<v Jacob Paulsen>to 20 years that was less than 20 years ago

00:57:40.448 --> 00:57:44.648
<v Jacob Paulsen>Uh, so now let's talk about why stand your ground has nothing to do with this.

00:57:44.848 --> 00:57:49.368
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. So when you're, before we do, sorry, one, one, one other thing here I think

00:57:49.368 --> 00:57:55.348
<v Riley Bowman>is, is relevant to point out is that there was, I would say very clearly another

00:57:55.348 --> 00:57:59.308
<v Riley Bowman>crime that was committed in this story, in this situation.

00:57:59.568 --> 00:58:03.828
<v Riley Bowman>And that was the initial contact by Marquise against Draca.

00:58:03.988 --> 00:58:04.568
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, sure. Right.

00:58:04.728 --> 00:58:09.648
<v Riley Bowman>Because what we have is just a, a verbal altercation is taking place.

00:58:09.648 --> 00:58:12.388
<v Riley Bowman>And I know that, you know, like, Hey man, that's my girl.

00:58:12.568 --> 00:58:16.628
<v Riley Bowman>Like I'm going to stand up with my girl, you know? So Marquise does what he thinks is right.

00:58:18.347 --> 00:58:24.227
<v Riley Bowman>But in so doing, he's actually the one that sort of draws first blood, so to speak.

00:58:24.667 --> 00:58:29.407
<v Jacob Paulsen>He's arguably the initial aggressor, even though he didn't start the verbal argument.

00:58:29.587 --> 00:58:31.747
<v Riley Bowman>And that's where this is an interesting case because it's like,

00:58:31.827 --> 00:58:35.767
<v Riley Bowman>you know, so if we were to go back in time, if we were to kind of step back

00:58:35.767 --> 00:58:39.787
<v Riley Bowman>frame by frame, and we're at that moment where Drake is on the ground.

00:58:40.627 --> 00:58:43.447
<v Riley Bowman>He's just been body checked, pushed, whatever, to the ground.

00:58:43.887 --> 00:58:47.787
<v Riley Bowman>And he draws his gun. And it starts coming out of the holster.

00:58:47.787 --> 00:58:49.427
<v Riley Bowman>Maybe it's even pointed at Marquise.

00:58:49.627 --> 00:58:53.787
<v Riley Bowman>Marquise is like, whoa, whoa, whoa. If we were to stop that right then,

00:58:53.907 --> 00:58:59.747
<v Riley Bowman>at that moment, and Marquise goes his way, Draco picks himself up and goes his

00:58:59.747 --> 00:59:03.407
<v Riley Bowman>own way, I mean, would have anything come of this?

00:59:03.567 --> 00:59:07.547
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, no big deal. I mean, is it possible that Marquise could have been charged with an assault?

00:59:07.867 --> 00:59:08.607
<v Riley Bowman>That's possible.

00:59:08.607 --> 00:59:09.207
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's possible.

00:59:09.327 --> 00:59:15.287
<v Riley Bowman>Could he have also tried to get Draco charged because he pulled out a gun?

00:59:15.407 --> 00:59:16.407
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sure, aggravated assault.

00:59:16.407 --> 00:59:22.087
<v Riley Bowman>It could have gone to something like that, but the point is that's a whole different

00:59:22.087 --> 00:59:25.267
<v Riley Bowman>thing, a whole other ball of wax, so to speak.

00:59:25.427 --> 00:59:30.707
<v Riley Bowman>But basically, nothing would have come of this unlike what actually ended up happening.

00:59:30.827 --> 00:59:31.647
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, 20 years in prison.

00:59:31.847 --> 00:59:32.187
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway.

00:59:32.447 --> 00:59:36.707
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and again, the real legal doctrine that gets him in trouble in the end

00:59:36.707 --> 00:59:38.467
<v Jacob Paulsen>is imminence. Did he have an imminent threat?

00:59:38.667 --> 00:59:44.247
<v Jacob Paulsen>Was in the moment he decided to act, did he have an active imminent happening

00:59:44.247 --> 00:59:46.027
<v Jacob Paulsen>now or about to happen threat?

00:59:47.027 --> 00:59:51.507
<v Jacob Paulsen>Or was that confrontation ending and de-escalating as the threat was removing

00:59:51.507 --> 00:59:52.787
<v Jacob Paulsen>himself? And that's what got him in trouble.

00:59:52.807 --> 00:59:56.127
<v Riley Bowman>I think even proportionality could probably come into the conversation as well.

00:59:56.387 --> 00:59:59.987
<v Jacob Paulsen>Debatable. You mentioned he has some limited mobility. He's on the ground,

01:00:00.507 --> 01:00:04.307
<v Jacob Paulsen>a young male standing over him. We could get into that debate.

01:00:04.447 --> 01:00:06.467
<v Riley Bowman>But what's clear is that Marquise is not armed.

01:00:08.794 --> 01:00:12.614
<v Riley Bowman>Yes, he may have pushed him down, but he's not armed, and he backs away.

01:00:13.114 --> 01:00:16.314
<v Riley Bowman>Right? And so now why is this not a stand-your-ground case?

01:00:16.674 --> 01:00:22.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the important thing. It's not a stand-your-ground case because,

01:00:22.394 --> 01:00:26.634
<v Jacob Paulsen>one, nothing hinged on whether or not he had a duty to retreat.

01:00:28.034 --> 01:00:33.774
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if he had had the duty, let's pick up this case and let's move it to Delaware

01:00:33.774 --> 01:00:36.674
<v Jacob Paulsen>where such a duty exists.

01:00:37.254 --> 01:00:41.374
<v Jacob Paulsen>Then we have to ask, but was he safely able to retreat or not?

01:00:41.554 --> 01:00:45.094
<v Jacob Paulsen>And if you were on the ground, on your back, on the asphalt,

01:00:45.334 --> 01:00:52.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>and your attacker is standing over you, younger, tougher, you know,

01:00:52.474 --> 01:00:56.234
<v Jacob Paulsen>whatever, standing over you, do you have a safe means of retreat?

01:00:56.574 --> 01:00:59.934
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think the answer is probably no, you don't.

01:01:00.314 --> 01:01:05.594
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the first reason why Stand Your Ground doesn't come into it is because

01:01:05.594 --> 01:01:09.754
<v Jacob Paulsen>even if this was in a duty-to-retreat state where you had to retreat,

01:01:09.894 --> 01:01:13.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>where you have no stand-your-ground at all, it still wouldn't matter because

01:01:13.314 --> 01:01:15.214
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can't retreat. You can't retreat from that.

01:01:15.414 --> 01:01:18.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>When you're on your back on the asphalt and you have limited mobility issues,

01:01:19.074 --> 01:01:23.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>probably getting up from that position is challenging already and someone is

01:01:23.174 --> 01:01:25.414
<v Jacob Paulsen>standing over you like, get up, I dare you.

01:01:27.174 --> 01:01:29.374
<v Jacob Paulsen>You don't have a safe means of retreat.

01:01:29.654 --> 01:01:31.354
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Yep.

01:01:31.954 --> 01:01:33.694
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's why it's not a stand-your-ground case.

01:01:33.694 --> 01:01:38.114
<v Riley Bowman>So in other words, duty to retreat or not is just not relevant.

01:01:38.274 --> 01:01:38.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>It doesn't apply.

01:01:39.254 --> 01:01:39.814
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Yep.

01:01:40.694 --> 01:01:44.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>In a place where there's a duty to retreat, you only have that duty to retreat

01:01:44.174 --> 01:01:46.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>when you're safely able to do so.

01:01:46.454 --> 01:01:51.054
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. And so it's a hinged requirement.

01:01:53.510 --> 01:02:01.210
<v Riley Bowman>There you go. So, and again, this is another example where I don't know the mind of Michael Draca.

01:02:01.450 --> 01:02:05.050
<v Riley Bowman>I don't know exactly what he was thinking. I don't know what he was thinking in the moment.

01:02:07.070 --> 01:02:10.670
<v Riley Bowman>I do know that, well, what I

01:02:10.670 --> 01:02:15.230
<v Riley Bowman>think, what I think is that he thought he was justified doing what he did.

01:02:16.010 --> 01:02:21.110
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And I think that he had a misunderstanding of what was reasonable,

01:02:21.110 --> 01:02:26.590
<v Riley Bowman>what was imminent, what was proportional in that situation.

01:02:26.950 --> 01:02:27.110
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes.

01:02:27.690 --> 01:02:32.170
<v Riley Bowman>And whether he thought it was a stand your ground or not, I don't know.

01:02:32.330 --> 01:02:37.590
<v Riley Bowman>But what I perceive from people that love to throw that out as a defense,

01:02:37.850 --> 01:02:43.970
<v Riley Bowman>stand your ground, is that they would very likely make a similar decision and it would be wrong.

01:02:44.610 --> 01:02:49.490
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah and we and we do see situations where this this comes into play and it

01:02:49.490 --> 01:02:53.110
<v Jacob Paulsen>gets people in trouble you know an interesting one and it's on our little list

01:02:53.110 --> 01:02:56.230
<v Jacob Paulsen>of potential ones discussed here is is written house written house is maybe

01:02:56.230 --> 01:03:03.790
<v Jacob Paulsen>uh one of the more relevant potential stand your ground ones uh that we could i think

01:03:03.790 --> 01:03:08.530
<v Riley Bowman>It's the most clear uh you know from the examples we have in our little list

01:03:08.530 --> 01:03:11.550
<v Riley Bowman>here i think it's the most clear stand your ground.

01:03:11.550 --> 01:03:13.250
<v Jacob Paulsen>Example yeah uh

01:03:13.250 --> 01:03:21.570
<v Riley Bowman>Because it is one where you know it what there was a possibility of retreat

01:03:21.570 --> 01:03:22.850
<v Riley Bowman>in fact he tried to retreat.

01:03:22.850 --> 01:03:25.390
<v Jacob Paulsen>He was constantly trying to retry trying

01:03:25.390 --> 01:03:26.810
<v Riley Bowman>To get away from the whole the.

01:03:26.810 --> 01:03:31.090
<v Jacob Paulsen>Whole engagement is a duty is a an attempt to retreat yeah

01:03:31.090 --> 01:03:34.650
<v Riley Bowman>Even though there was not a requirement to do.

01:03:34.650 --> 01:03:37.890
<v Jacob Paulsen>So right this in Wisconsin where there's no duty to retreat.

01:03:38.050 --> 01:03:38.850
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's a stand your ground state.

01:03:39.030 --> 01:03:42.470
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. I know where it gets tricky in some people's minds is,

01:03:42.730 --> 01:03:44.150
<v Riley Bowman>well, he showed up at this.

01:03:45.363 --> 01:03:46.803
<v Jacob Paulsen>He chose to be there.

01:03:46.883 --> 01:03:51.603
<v Riley Bowman>He showed up there. He brought a gun with him. Okay. And I know that like that

01:03:51.603 --> 01:03:53.183
<v Riley Bowman>doesn't necessarily look good.

01:03:53.923 --> 01:03:58.343
<v Riley Bowman>But there was, and this is what was interesting. I paid pretty close attention

01:03:58.343 --> 01:03:59.483
<v Riley Bowman>to the Rittenhouse case.

01:03:59.603 --> 01:04:02.903
<v Riley Bowman>And I remember I was driving back from somewhere on a trip.

01:04:03.103 --> 01:04:08.463
<v Riley Bowman>And I just remember I had several hours of just driving and I had the live feed

01:04:08.463 --> 01:04:15.323
<v Riley Bowman>of like the final day of that trial, closing arguments, all that going on.

01:04:16.223 --> 01:04:21.703
<v Riley Bowman>And, you know, I mean, what it came down to is that there wasn't anything that

01:04:21.703 --> 01:04:24.643
<v Riley Bowman>Kyle actually did that was illegal.

01:04:24.903 --> 01:04:26.863
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. Right. He might have made some bad decisions.

01:04:27.953 --> 01:04:31.093
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. That's up for debate. Like teach, teach, teach, teach opinion.

01:04:31.573 --> 01:04:34.333
<v Riley Bowman>I would, I don't know for sure. I haven't talked to him personally,

01:04:34.333 --> 01:04:39.933
<v Riley Bowman>but I mean, if it were me and I went through the heck that he did after the

01:04:39.933 --> 01:04:41.753
<v Riley Bowman>fact, I'd be like, yeah, I kind of wish I didn't go there.

01:04:42.553 --> 01:04:46.213
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. I have, I have talked to him personally, uh, face to face.

01:04:46.353 --> 01:04:47.873
<v Riley Bowman>Oh yeah, that's right. That's right.

01:04:47.953 --> 01:04:51.673
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I, I don't want to misquote the guy cause he didn't say this,

01:04:51.793 --> 01:04:58.193
<v Jacob Paulsen>but my sense is, um, he doesn't think he did anything wrong or anything foolish or bad. Okay.

01:04:58.793 --> 01:05:03.573
<v Jacob Paulsen>But again, he didn't say that to me. That was just the sense I got from the conversation we had.

01:05:03.753 --> 01:05:04.793
<v Riley Bowman>And that's okay, too.

01:05:05.473 --> 01:05:07.413
<v Jacob Paulsen>Teach their own. I'm not trying to judge.

01:05:07.573 --> 01:05:11.393
<v Riley Bowman>He went there doing what I think he felt was the right thing,

01:05:11.773 --> 01:05:16.973
<v Riley Bowman>trying to provide protection to this community. That's right.

01:05:18.913 --> 01:05:23.393
<v Riley Bowman>And that's okay. But I just, you know, I feel like if it were me,

01:05:23.493 --> 01:05:24.533
<v Riley Bowman>I'd be like, man, that was,

01:05:24.653 --> 01:05:28.673
<v Riley Bowman>I'm not so sure that was worth it or not, you know, Because that's a lot of

01:05:28.673 --> 01:05:35.153
<v Riley Bowman>pain and trouble and expense and life-altering change.

01:05:35.253 --> 01:05:39.913
<v Riley Bowman>I'd much rather not be famous for what he's famous for.

01:05:40.933 --> 01:05:45.373
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, I think a reasonable person would probably like to rewind that call.

01:05:45.373 --> 01:05:51.913
<v Riley Bowman>You pretty much can't live a normal life having the name Kyle Rittenhouse, right?

01:05:51.913 --> 01:06:02.273
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, so I do think it is a good example of Stand Your Ground in that he was there lawfully.

01:06:02.573 --> 01:06:06.733
<v Riley Bowman>He was allowed to be there just like any of the other people were allowed to be there.

01:06:06.893 --> 01:06:14.713
<v Riley Bowman>He was carrying a gun actually lawfully under the statutes of Wisconsin.

01:06:16.093 --> 01:06:22.653
<v Riley Bowman>And when it came down to it, he was attacked. He was hit. by a skateboard.

01:06:23.515 --> 01:06:29.055
<v Riley Bowman>Which constitutes a weapon. He was attacked multiple times with multiple individuals

01:06:29.055 --> 01:06:33.055
<v Riley Bowman>and he used force in self-defense.

01:06:33.355 --> 01:06:38.475
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes, and I think what makes it such a good example is because it may be,

01:06:38.575 --> 01:06:42.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's not exactly a good example where a duty to retreat impacted a case because

01:06:42.775 --> 01:06:44.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>it took place in a non-state.

01:06:44.515 --> 01:06:48.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm saying it's an example of how it's potentially applicable because this is

01:06:48.615 --> 01:06:52.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>a situation where he constantly was trying to disengage and get away.

01:06:54.455 --> 01:07:01.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>And often his attempt to do so was thwarted and challenged, and that's what

01:07:01.355 --> 01:07:02.435
<v Jacob Paulsen>led to some of his problems.

01:07:02.735 --> 01:07:14.015
<v Jacob Paulsen>But once the fight began, his seemingly sole objective was to disengage and escape.

01:07:14.235 --> 01:07:14.555
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:07:14.855 --> 01:07:18.035
<v Jacob Paulsen>Up to the point of walking up to the cops and trying to surrender himself.

01:07:18.215 --> 01:07:18.515
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:07:18.515 --> 01:07:23.595
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that is why, had this taken place in a duty to retreat state,

01:07:23.815 --> 01:07:27.915
<v Jacob Paulsen>not a stand your ground state, he would have been a prime example of somebody

01:07:27.915 --> 01:07:31.235
<v Jacob Paulsen>who followed the letter of the law in that respect.

01:07:31.575 --> 01:07:35.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>As it were, it was probably just good tactics. But it would have been like following

01:07:35.995 --> 01:07:40.015
<v Jacob Paulsen>the requirement of duty to retreat had it taken place in a state where it was required.

01:07:40.015 --> 01:07:44.075
<v Riley Bowman>And that's something I think is noteworthy to this discussion as we get close

01:07:44.075 --> 01:07:49.395
<v Riley Bowman>to wrapping this up is that when we're talking about stand your ground,

01:07:49.815 --> 01:07:56.215
<v Riley Bowman>there's the legal side of this as far as retreat or not, right?

01:07:56.215 --> 01:07:59.635
<v Riley Bowman>Whether you're obligated to or not and there

01:07:59.635 --> 01:08:06.435
<v Riley Bowman>is the uh the tactical decision making side of this yes of whether or not the

01:08:06.435 --> 01:08:11.175
<v Riley Bowman>law says i must retreat or whether the law says there is no obligation to do

01:08:11.175 --> 01:08:19.155
<v Riley Bowman>so is it the right thing to try to do um and those are two different things what the law.

01:08:19.887 --> 01:08:23.207
<v Riley Bowman>You know, either permits us to do or obligates us to do.

01:08:23.647 --> 01:08:28.787
<v Riley Bowman>And what we, whether it's on a more moral basis, personally speaking,

01:08:29.007 --> 01:08:36.487
<v Riley Bowman>or tactical, like that's, those are completely different decision-making paths, potentially.

01:08:36.807 --> 01:08:39.967
<v Riley Bowman>They can be one and the same. I mean, they, and they can end up in the same

01:08:39.967 --> 01:08:43.567
<v Riley Bowman>place too, as far as we decide to try to retreat or not or whatever,

01:08:43.727 --> 01:08:47.807
<v Riley Bowman>but that's, those are two different decision-making trees is what I want to point out to this.

01:08:48.067 --> 01:08:52.267
<v Riley Bowman>And what I would say is that even if not obligated to retreat,

01:08:52.627 --> 01:08:55.507
<v Riley Bowman>and this is why I think we're bringing up the Rittenhouse case,

01:08:55.647 --> 01:09:01.447
<v Riley Bowman>just so this is clear, is that it is still in, I would say in almost all cases,

01:09:02.027 --> 01:09:05.987
<v Riley Bowman>unless you're just putting yourself at greater jeopardy, it is almost always

01:09:05.987 --> 01:09:11.787
<v Riley Bowman>wiser, smarter, more tactically sound for you to try to retreat.

01:09:11.927 --> 01:09:13.327
<v Jacob Paulsen>If safely able.

01:09:13.707 --> 01:09:19.287
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. And so, because I mean, that is a win in my book if like if we don't

01:09:19.287 --> 01:09:23.307
<v Riley Bowman>have to get involved in a self-defense shooting at all that's a win,

01:09:24.038 --> 01:09:31.418
<v Riley Bowman>The upside of that is way better than, you know, the opposite end of ending

01:09:31.418 --> 01:09:37.338
<v Riley Bowman>up and spending any amount of time in jail, being a part of an investigation,

01:09:37.838 --> 01:09:43.298
<v Riley Bowman>having to go through a trial, having your entire life just completely transformed

01:09:43.298 --> 01:09:46.738
<v Riley Bowman>in many ways, not probably ideal.

01:09:46.738 --> 01:09:50.038
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, like if your name, if your last name is Rittenhouse,

01:09:50.178 --> 01:09:53.498
<v Riley Bowman>there's a high probability there are just certain jobs you will not be able

01:09:53.498 --> 01:09:56.978
<v Riley Bowman>to get because those people just won't like you.

01:09:57.158 --> 01:09:57.398
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah.

01:09:57.658 --> 01:09:57.838
<v Riley Bowman>Right?

01:09:59.058 --> 01:10:05.018
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway. Yeah. Well, there's one more case on our list that I think is worth quickly mentioning.

01:10:05.078 --> 01:10:08.638
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's one we actually mentioned two weeks ago when we did our legislative

01:10:08.638 --> 01:10:09.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>updates from Akron, Ohio.

01:10:10.098 --> 01:10:13.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think it's also a really interesting tactics and legal one.

01:10:13.118 --> 01:10:17.178
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ohio is actually a standard ground state and it's the most recent standard ground

01:10:17.178 --> 01:10:23.898
<v Jacob Paulsen>state relatively maybe in the last 5-6 years, thank you so 5 years ago

01:10:25.038 --> 01:10:29.478
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ohio passed a statute to statutorily become a standard ground state to remove

01:10:29.478 --> 01:10:31.718
<v Jacob Paulsen>the duty of retreat but what happens is in Akron,

01:10:31.838 --> 01:10:37.378
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ohio this is the DoorDash driver and his girl who are out cruising around doing

01:10:37.378 --> 01:10:41.398
<v Jacob Paulsen>deliveries, in my own personal words eating bag fries

01:10:42.638 --> 01:10:47.558
<v Jacob Paulsen>and they date night is door dash you get paid while having a date night

01:10:48.518 --> 01:10:53.578
<v Jacob Paulsen>so they're out doing their thing and they're being tailgated by a 17 year old

01:10:53.578 --> 01:10:57.958
<v Jacob Paulsen>driver with his 15 year old brother in tow and they decide that they'll want

01:10:57.958 --> 01:11:02.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>to pull over and let these guys pass but instead of passing per se

01:11:02.878 --> 01:11:09.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>they kind of the 15 year old opens fire on the door dash driver's girl and he

01:11:09.198 --> 01:11:14.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>returns fire And then as soon as they disengage and the attackers drive off,

01:11:15.078 --> 01:11:19.218
<v Jacob Paulsen>he and his girl drive off also and head to a gas station, Circle K,

01:11:19.498 --> 01:11:21.698
<v Jacob Paulsen>if I recall correctly, and they call the cops.

01:11:23.102 --> 01:11:28.422
<v Jacob Paulsen>In the moment they're taking fire, they determine they cannot safely retreat, right?

01:11:28.742 --> 01:11:31.622
<v Jacob Paulsen>Getting in the car and driving at this point, like, they're stationary.

01:11:32.042 --> 01:11:35.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>They're not moving. They're parked. I mean, I don't know if the car's in park,

01:11:35.522 --> 01:11:39.182
<v Jacob Paulsen>but they're stationary on the side of the road, and they're taking fire.

01:11:39.722 --> 01:11:43.102
<v Jacob Paulsen>So in this moment, they have to say, hey, like, could we retreat from this?

01:11:43.302 --> 01:11:46.222
<v Jacob Paulsen>The answer is no, not fast enough.

01:11:46.482 --> 01:11:46.862
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

01:11:47.082 --> 01:11:51.002
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? So returning fire is the thing that you do that's the most efficient way to stop the threat.

01:11:51.502 --> 01:11:54.242
<v Jacob Paulsen>And as soon as the threat ceases, like, we're not getting shot at anymore.

01:11:54.722 --> 01:11:56.242
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, it looks like they drove off.

01:11:56.622 --> 01:12:02.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>Cool. Now we remove ourselves. Now we retreat. Now we get to safety. And so I think this is.

01:12:02.882 --> 01:12:05.702
<v Riley Bowman>And they called it in and reported. Yeah. You know what happened.

01:12:05.762 --> 01:12:07.722
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is a fantastic example of good tactics.

01:12:07.922 --> 01:12:08.102
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:12:08.482 --> 01:12:11.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>That would also meet the criteria of a duty to retreat law should you be in

01:12:11.882 --> 01:12:12.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>a state where it's necessary.

01:12:12.782 --> 01:12:15.742
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. No, I like that one as well. And as you mentioned,

01:12:15.822 --> 01:12:20.322
<v Riley Bowman>that's just our most recent Justified Saves episode. We covered that very story.

01:12:21.002 --> 01:12:25.262
<v Riley Bowman>There's one more thing I wanted to share story-wise, Jacob, and the reason why

01:12:25.262 --> 01:12:32.742
<v Riley Bowman>is because the defendant and now convict of this particular case tried to claim

01:12:32.742 --> 01:12:36.142
<v Riley Bowman>stand-your-ground immunity, if you will.

01:12:36.362 --> 01:12:41.542
<v Riley Bowman>This is the Ralph Yarl case. This is a 16-year-old Ralph Yarl.

01:12:41.822 --> 01:12:44.062
<v Riley Bowman>This happened in Kansas City, Missouri area.

01:12:44.782 --> 01:12:49.442
<v Riley Bowman>He was trying to go and, I think, pick up his siblings from somebody from a home.

01:12:49.442 --> 01:12:52.082
<v Riley Bowman>So you know mom was probably like hey go get your

01:12:52.082 --> 01:12:56.342
<v Riley Bowman>go get your brothers or whatever right so ralph goes to what he thinks is the

01:12:56.342 --> 01:13:00.622
<v Riley Bowman>home it turns out he's mistaken but he just has the wrong house wrong address

01:13:00.622 --> 01:13:04.062
<v Riley Bowman>yeah you know hey hey it's that one down there with the red door okay you know

01:13:04.062 --> 01:13:10.782
<v Riley Bowman>like so he shows up the wrong door he rings the doorbell and 84 year old andrew lester,

01:13:12.128 --> 01:13:17.288
<v Riley Bowman>With virtually no, like, by all accounts, there's, like, no warning given.

01:13:17.628 --> 01:13:21.248
<v Riley Bowman>There's no, there's not really anything that happens other than Andrew Lester

01:13:21.248 --> 01:13:24.968
<v Riley Bowman>just starts blasting through the door. I'm being attacked. Yeah.

01:13:25.588 --> 01:13:30.708
<v Riley Bowman>And he strikes Ralph a couple times in the head and in the arm.

01:13:31.248 --> 01:13:34.948
<v Riley Bowman>Fortunately, this 16-year-old boy survives this whole thing.

01:13:36.408 --> 01:13:37.928
<v Riley Bowman>But what was interesting about

01:13:37.928 --> 01:13:41.708
<v Riley Bowman>this is that Lester tried to invoke Missouri's Stand Your Ground law.

01:13:43.789 --> 01:13:48.889
<v Riley Bowman>But, which is interesting because, number one, this took place at a dwelling.

01:13:50.509 --> 01:13:57.029
<v Riley Bowman>And two, like, I mean, he's in his home. He's behind a door. Like, it's secured.

01:13:57.349 --> 01:14:01.049
<v Riley Bowman>Like, anyway, he tries to stand your ground as a defense.

01:14:01.089 --> 01:14:02.089
<v Jacob Paulsen>The attorney tries to make this defense.

01:14:02.349 --> 01:14:06.489
<v Riley Bowman>And it's clear, like, that is not the case. It has nothing to do with this.

01:14:06.489 --> 01:14:07.969
<v Riley Bowman>It has nothing to do with this situation.

01:14:08.609 --> 01:14:11.729
<v Riley Bowman>And, frankly, everything about it is not reasonable because,

01:14:12.629 --> 01:14:13.689
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, like, what is reasonable?

01:14:13.789 --> 01:14:17.809
<v Riley Bowman>About your doorbell ringing and you're like, and maybe you look through your

01:14:17.809 --> 01:14:20.269
<v Riley Bowman>peephole or you're looking at your camera or whatever.

01:14:20.449 --> 01:14:24.089
<v Riley Bowman>And you're like, I don't know this young kid. He looks like a threat.

01:14:24.349 --> 01:14:29.709
<v Riley Bowman>Bang, bang, bang, bang. You know, there's nothing reasonable at all about this whole situation.

01:14:30.029 --> 01:14:33.989
<v Riley Bowman>Um, and I'm just, I just wanted to make sure we use this as an example to show

01:14:33.989 --> 01:14:39.669
<v Riley Bowman>like people have a completely miss the complete wrong misunderstanding of what

01:14:39.669 --> 01:14:45.549
<v Riley Bowman>standard ground is and try to use it as this catch-all defense for any time

01:14:45.549 --> 01:14:47.449
<v Riley Bowman>they draw and fire shots,

01:14:47.609 --> 01:14:51.389
<v Riley Bowman>including in situations where they are just completely not justified at all.

01:14:52.909 --> 01:14:59.009
<v Jacob Paulsen>I guess the way I perceive this is self-defense has requirements,

01:14:59.049 --> 01:15:04.029
<v Jacob Paulsen>and people think that a stand-your-ground law removes all the requirements,

01:15:04.049 --> 01:15:06.409
<v Jacob Paulsen>and you can just defend yourself anytime, time,

01:15:07.029 --> 01:15:08.949
<v Jacob Paulsen>anywhere, in any reason.

01:15:09.529 --> 01:15:13.269
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's what they think stand your ground is. And it's not like self-defense

01:15:13.269 --> 01:15:15.969
<v Jacob Paulsen>has requirements and stand your ground removes one of them.

01:15:16.129 --> 01:15:16.369
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

01:15:16.669 --> 01:15:17.949
<v Jacob Paulsen>But you still got other requirements.

01:15:18.209 --> 01:15:18.489
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

01:15:18.689 --> 01:15:23.909
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's, that's all it does. And it's not a blanket, um, you know,

01:15:24.349 --> 01:15:29.269
<v Jacob Paulsen>just permission to defend yourself in any circumstance, which you think it's a good idea.

01:15:29.609 --> 01:15:30.789
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Exactly.

01:15:32.041 --> 01:15:35.381
<v Riley Bowman>And if I could offer one more thing as kind of closing words to this,

01:15:35.601 --> 01:15:40.941
<v Riley Bowman>be mindful of what you say online and publicly about these kinds of things.

01:15:42.921 --> 01:15:48.461
<v Riley Bowman>Because all those sorts of things, your entire social media history can be subpoenaed

01:15:48.461 --> 01:15:53.521
<v Riley Bowman>and released to prosecutors and to the courts as evidence.

01:15:53.521 --> 01:15:56.381
<v Riley Bowman>Uh one thing that prosecutors try to

01:15:56.381 --> 01:16:00.021
<v Riley Bowman>do is use that as uh you

01:16:00.021 --> 01:16:03.041
<v Riley Bowman>know basically to show how you have a history and a pattern

01:16:03.041 --> 01:16:08.961
<v Riley Bowman>of saying certain things acting certain ways thinking certain things that do

01:16:08.961 --> 01:16:13.841
<v Riley Bowman>not make your case look good not at all uh and of course i mean this we just

01:16:13.841 --> 01:16:18.381
<v Riley Bowman>talked about how you need to make reasonable good prudent wise sane moral decisions

01:16:18.381 --> 01:16:21.241
<v Riley Bowman>that hopefully keep you out of this in the first place,

01:16:21.461 --> 01:16:25.001
<v Riley Bowman>but also just be mindful of what you say publicly and online,

01:16:25.001 --> 01:16:27.881
<v Riley Bowman>because all of that can be admissible into the court of law.

01:16:28.501 --> 01:16:32.921
<v Riley Bowman>And, you know, if you're one of those out there, I mean, we're doing this whole

01:16:32.921 --> 01:16:37.861
<v Riley Bowman>episode so that hopefully we catch some of you out there that are online being

01:16:37.861 --> 01:16:39.161
<v Riley Bowman>all like, stand your ground.

01:16:39.701 --> 01:16:43.461
<v Riley Bowman>And hopefully you start thinking twice about what it actually means.

01:16:43.481 --> 01:16:45.001
<v Riley Bowman>And now you're a little bit better informed.

01:16:45.241 --> 01:16:49.801
<v Riley Bowman>We just gave you all these examples and the logic and the reason and the history

01:16:49.801 --> 01:16:56.221
<v Riley Bowman>and what the laws actually say what stand your ground actually is and i hope

01:16:56.221 --> 01:17:00.521
<v Riley Bowman>that you'll think twice before you say anything that you'll later regret online in.

01:17:00.521 --> 01:17:07.941
<v Jacob Paulsen>The last 28 days we've had 95 000 comments on facebook posts on the conciliacurray.com

01:17:07.941 --> 01:17:12.221
<v Jacob Paulsen>facebook page i just pulled it up to check 95 000 last 28 days that's

01:17:12.221 --> 01:17:12.741
<v Riley Bowman>A lot of comments.

01:17:13.938 --> 01:17:17.998
<v Jacob Paulsen>Our poor social media guy. There's no way he's reading them all. No.

01:17:18.198 --> 01:17:22.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>How would you? Anyway, I bet you half of them would look damning in court.

01:17:23.098 --> 01:17:23.458
<v Riley Bowman>Yes.

01:17:23.798 --> 01:17:29.078
<v Jacob Paulsen>So including outright threats against the governor of Virginia.

01:17:30.698 --> 01:17:34.598
<v Jacob Paulsen>Crazy stuff. I just do not understand what people are thinking.

01:17:35.178 --> 01:17:36.918
<v Jacob Paulsen>We don't get subpoenaed, by the way.

01:17:37.638 --> 01:17:40.858
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you say something dumb on our – they subpoena Facebook.

01:17:41.238 --> 01:17:41.758
<v Riley Bowman>They just send it to Facebook.

01:17:41.878 --> 01:17:43.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, Meta is the one that gets subpoenaed and just turns it over.

01:17:43.938 --> 01:17:49.278
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I don't know how many times comments on our posts have been subpoenaed in the trial.

01:17:50.098 --> 01:17:54.918
<v Jacob Paulsen>Probably dozens of times. We don't even know about it. How would we know?

01:17:55.458 --> 01:17:56.918
<v Jacob Paulsen>Meta's the one getting subpoenaed.

01:17:57.518 --> 01:17:59.278
<v Jacob Paulsen>What are these idiots thinking?

01:18:01.338 --> 01:18:04.418
<v Jacob Paulsen>Most of the time it's that they're outright, like their thinking is immoral.

01:18:05.158 --> 01:18:08.238
<v Jacob Paulsen>But sometimes their thinking is just misinformed.

01:18:09.038 --> 01:18:13.278
<v Jacob Paulsen>You're just wrong. That's not actually true. And either could get you in trouble

01:18:13.278 --> 01:18:15.258
<v Jacob Paulsen>in court. Yeah. So be careful.

01:18:16.477 --> 01:18:20.417
<v Riley Bowman>There you go. Words of wisdom for sure. Thank you for being with us for another

01:18:20.417 --> 01:18:21.957
<v Riley Bowman>episode of the Concealed Carry Podcast.

01:18:22.557 --> 01:18:26.997
<v Riley Bowman>Today's episode was sponsored by Guardian Nation, which you can learn more about

01:18:26.997 --> 01:18:28.297
<v Riley Bowman>at guardiannation.com.

01:18:28.417 --> 01:18:31.637
<v Riley Bowman>We hope you'll join us there, be part of the tribe,

01:18:31.777 --> 01:18:37.697
<v Riley Bowman>the family, the nation, and also CCWsafe, ccwsafe.com

01:18:37.697 --> 01:18:44.197
<v Riley Bowman>for the best legal team in the business out there that will help keep you on

01:18:44.197 --> 01:18:50.097
<v Riley Bowman>the straight and narrow path to navigate these tricky waters if you do ever

01:18:50.097 --> 01:18:55.637
<v Riley Bowman>find yourself in some kind of self-defense situation and the legal aftermath that follows.

01:18:56.117 --> 01:18:58.697
<v Riley Bowman>Just make sure you have that membership and that number. I mean,

01:18:58.777 --> 01:19:03.717
<v Riley Bowman>it's a number you can call 24-7, and we've seen it go into action even.

01:19:03.837 --> 01:19:09.137
<v Riley Bowman>We've been at the dinner table with some of that critical response team when

01:19:09.137 --> 01:19:14.737
<v Riley Bowman>they suddenly all got messages, hey, we got an incident, and they're all like,

01:19:15.017 --> 01:19:16.837
<v Riley Bowman>okay, all right, we'll keep monitoring that.

01:19:16.917 --> 01:19:18.837
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's like Jason Bourne style. It's like prep for transport.

01:19:19.097 --> 01:19:25.537
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, exactly. And that's happened where they get a message and it basically

01:19:25.537 --> 01:19:26.997
<v Riley Bowman>is like, okay, it's go time.

01:19:27.097 --> 01:19:27.677
<v Jacob Paulsen>We might have to leave.

01:19:27.737 --> 01:19:31.497
<v Riley Bowman>We're going to Springfield, Illinois, whatever.

01:19:31.737 --> 01:19:36.937
<v Riley Bowman>I'm just picking a place, random place, because we have a member there that needs us right now.

01:19:36.937 --> 01:19:39.797
<v Riley Bowman>That's the kind of team you have backing you up if you're a member of ccw safe

01:19:39.797 --> 01:19:45.897
<v Riley Bowman>well thanks for uh everybody everything guys uh like share subscribe the podcast

01:19:45.897 --> 01:19:49.757
<v Riley Bowman>if you would please we appreciate it uh hope to to reach more people because

01:19:49.757 --> 01:19:54.317
<v Riley Bowman>they need to hear about the things we were just talking about here today jacob that's.

01:19:54.317 --> 01:19:56.537
<v Jacob Paulsen>It remember to train right train often and train safe

01:19:56.537 --> 01:20:00.157
<v Riley Bowman>So you can fight hard fight fast and fight true take care,

01:20:13.875 --> 01:20:16.135
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder that laws vary from place to place, and we encourage listeners to

01:20:16.135 --> 01:20:18.075
<v Riley Bowman>seek local legal advice to understand applicable laws.

01:20:18.435 --> 01:20:20.535
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, Inc., its brands and properties, and the Concealed Carry podcast

01:20:20.535 --> 01:20:22.275
<v Riley Bowman>is not a legal service, nor are we attorneys at law.

01:20:22.455 --> 01:20:25.035
<v Riley Bowman>We make our best-fade effort to share Concealed Carry-related insights and information

01:20:25.035 --> 01:20:28.375
<v Riley Bowman>about firearm-related incidents and the laws pertaining, based on our own understanding and experience.

01:20:28.695 --> 01:20:30.915
<v Riley Bowman>But things can be different where you live, or laws may have changed by the

01:20:30.915 --> 01:20:33.395
<v Riley Bowman>time you listen to this. We cannot be held liable for your actions based on

01:20:33.395 --> 01:20:34.435
<v Riley Bowman>the information shared in this podcast.

01:20:34.775 --> 01:20:36.775
<v Riley Bowman>Please exercise care with all things pertaining to firearm use,

01:20:36.955 --> 01:20:39.395
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, and always practice following basic firearm safety rules.

01:20:39.615 --> 01:20:44.495
<v Riley Bowman>More information about safety can be found at concealedcarry.com forward slash safety. Thank you.

