WEBVTT

00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:19.000
that maybe some of you have heard.

00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:21.000
If you grew up in church, maybe you've heard this statement,

00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:23.000
the Bible says it.

00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:25.000
I believe it.

00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:26.000
That settles it.

00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:28.000
Anybody heard this?

00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:30.000
The Bible says it.

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:32.000
I believe it. That settles it.

00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:36.000
In fact, that phrase kind of defined a whole era of faith

00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:38.000
for a lot of us.

00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:39.000
It sounds confident.

00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:41.000
It sounds faithful.

00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:46.000
But it doesn't actually invite curiosity or conversation.

00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:50.000
It shuts those both down completely.

00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:53.000
And that's what happens when we read scripture through

00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:57.000
what Zach calls in this book, the literalism lens.

00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:01.000
Before we unpack what the literalism lens is,

00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:03.000
let's have some fun.

00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:10.000
So I get some of the wild literal readings of the Bible

00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:12.000
that we could get into.

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:17.000
So years ago, so long ago it seems now,

00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:20.000
I was a youth pastor.

00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:25.000
Yeah, some of you remember that.

00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:30.000
Students in our youth group thought that they were funny

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:33.000
as students too.

00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:38.000
And when they would see me without a hat,

00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:40.000
it's been this way for years.

00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:42.000
I'll give you a caveat real quick.

00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:43.000
This is kind of funny.

00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:45.000
You guys see the top of my head, right?

00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:50.000
Like, I just got it shaved or trimmed, but you see.

00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.000
I was at a party, a birthday party recently,

00:01:54.000 --> 00:01:58.000
and I was sitting in this room and just talking to this guy,

00:01:58.000 --> 00:02:02.000
and he brought it up probably because I'd taken my hat off.

00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:05.000
And he was telling me about how he'd flown to Turkey.

00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:08.000
And when he went to Turkey, he got hair implants.

00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:10.000
They're doing this whole thing where they take care

00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:12.000
from the back of your head and they put it in the front.

00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:17.000
And he started showing me pictures, and it was gross.

00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:22.000
But he had gotten his hairline fixed and created different parts.

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:24.000
He was like, "I just couldn't."

00:02:24.000 --> 00:02:26.000
He's like, "Have you ever thought about getting hair implants?"

00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:30.000
And I said, "I'm 43 years old and I've been bald for like 20 years."

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:35.000
If I came back in with hair, it would be like LeBron James.

00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:40.000
His hairline moved and everybody was like, "Wait a minute.

00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:43.000
It's been too long, guys."

00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:46.000
Anyway, so it's been this way for a while.

00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:48.000
So when I was a youth pastor, students thought it was funny,

00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:51.000
and they would send me this picture really most of the time

00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:54.000
and the video clip, but this picture from SpongeBob.

00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:56.000
(Laughter)

00:02:56.000 --> 00:02:58.000
I don't know if you guys, if you've watched SpongeBob,

00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:01.000
you might know exactly what clip this is.

00:03:01.000 --> 00:03:05.000
But this king had a paper sack on his head

00:03:05.000 --> 00:03:10.000
and SpongeBob's asking why, and he takes his paper sack off his head

00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:13.000
and this is the moment that SpongeBob is staring at it

00:03:13.000 --> 00:03:16.000
and just goes, "Bald, bald, bald."

00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:20.000
And then it clips to all these other little weird-looking things,

00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:23.000
all yelling, "Bald, bald."

00:03:23.000 --> 00:03:27.000
So my youth thought it was really funny to send me this.

00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:30.000
Let me put this back on so I don't blind you.

00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:32.000
So naturally, when I would get this,

00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:36.000
I would read a certain story out of Scripture.

00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:40.000
I would go to 2 Kings, 2 Kings 2 or 23,

00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:42.000
and I would start with this story.

00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:46.000
From there, Elisha went up to Bethel as he was walking along the road.

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:48.000
Some boys came out of the town and jeered at him.

00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:50.000
"Get out of here, baldy," they said.

00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:52.000
"Get out of here, baldy."

00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:55.000
He turned around, looked at them,

00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:58.000
called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord,

00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:01.000
and two bears came out of the woods and mauled 42 of the boys.

00:04:01.000 --> 00:04:07.000
(Laughter)

00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:08.000
Yeah.

00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:10.000
And then I would start counting.

00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:15.000
One, two, three, four, five, six.

00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:20.000
That's in Scripture.

00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:23.000
(Laughter)

00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.000
Like, are we supposed to believe that...

00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:27.000
Thanks.

00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:28.000
Appreciate it.

00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:33.000
We're supposed to believe that God is waiting to unleash bears

00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:35.000
on teenagers with bad attitudes.

00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:38.000
Some parents are like, "Hmm."

00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:40.000
But if we're taking that story literally,

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:43.000
like this is what we're thinking, right?

00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:47.000
Or if you go to, like, even the New Testament, Jesus in Mark 9,

00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:52.000
he says, "If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off."

00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:53.000
Right?

00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:54.000
Just get rid of that thing.

00:04:54.000 --> 00:04:56.000
If it's causing you to sin, get rid of it.

00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:58.000
If that's literal, then at least half of us in here wouldn't make it

00:04:58.000 --> 00:05:03.000
through this week with one piece of us still intact, right?

00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:07.000
And then there's the verse in Mark 16 that says,

00:05:07.000 --> 00:05:11.000
"Believers will pick up snakes and drink poison."

00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:13.000
And there were churches in the Appalachian Mountain area

00:05:13.000 --> 00:05:14.000
that began to do this.

00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:16.000
They would grab snakes and they would...

00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:18.000
They said that they were fine.

00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:21.000
The Scripture said that if they got bit by the snake,

00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:22.000
it didn't matter.

00:05:22.000 --> 00:05:23.000
The Holy Spirit would protect them.

00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:25.000
And then you had a bunch of people ending up in the ER.

00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:28.000
(Laughter)

00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:31.000
In fact, when we moved into this building,

00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:34.000
we moved a bunch of our equipment and boxes and stuff,

00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:37.000
and there used to be a box back here.

00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:41.000
This red rolling box, a tour box.

00:05:41.000 --> 00:05:45.000
And on the top of it, it said snakes.

00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:47.000
And I remember walking back there one time,

00:05:47.000 --> 00:05:48.000
I forget who was with me, but they were like,

00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:49.000
"What is this?"

00:05:49.000 --> 00:05:50.000
I said, "Oh, that's where we keep the snakes

00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:51.000
for Sunday morning worship."

00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:52.000
(Laughter)

00:05:52.000 --> 00:05:54.000
And they were like, "What?"

00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:58.000
But it's like sound snakes.

00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:00.000
Anyway.

00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:02.000
I mean, I grew up Pentecostal.

00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:06.000
We never played with snakes, but...

00:06:06.000 --> 00:06:11.000
But if we read the Bible flatly,

00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:14.000
we'd have prophets summoning bears,

00:06:14.000 --> 00:06:16.000
people cutting off limbs,

00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:19.000
pastors handing out venom at communion.

00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:22.000
So maybe the problem isn't the Bible itself.

00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:26.000
Maybe it's how we've been taught to read it.

00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:28.000
And that's what we're talking about and the whole reason

00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:32.000
that we're in this series that we call better ways to read the Bible

00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:35.000
through this book that Zach is helping us point things out.

00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:40.000
Last week we talked about how all of us come to Scripture

00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:46.000
wearing lenses, our experiences, our culture, our upbringing.

00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:49.000
They all color how we see the text.

00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:52.000
The problem isn't that we have those lenses.

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:56.000
The problem is pretending that we don't.

00:06:56.000 --> 00:07:00.000
Zach compares it to being at the eye doctor, the one.

00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:02.000
Is one better or two?

00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:04.000
One or two?

00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:06.000
I don't know.

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.000
Neither of them.

00:07:08.000 --> 00:07:10.000
I actually, I don't know where I put them.

00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:12.000
I had my glasses.

00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:13.000
They don't even work.

00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:15.000
Everything's blurry.

00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:19.000
I think I messed up on the one and twos.

00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:24.000
But the goal isn't to find no lenses at all

00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:25.000
for us to read Scripture through.

00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:29.000
It's to find the ones that help us see Jesus most clearly.

00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:33.000
He points out in this book that the way Zach has broken it down

00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:39.000
is there's four lenses that he points out that inflict harm.

00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:42.000
And then there's others that actually promote healing as we come to Scripture.

00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:45.000
The four harmful lenses we're going to explore are the literalism lens.

00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:46.000
That's today's focus.

00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:47.000
We'll look at that.

00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:50.000
The apocalypse lens.

00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:53.000
The moralism lens and the hierarchy lens.

00:07:53.000 --> 00:07:56.000
So we'll go through those over the next few weeks.

00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:59.000
And then later we'll come into the healing ones.

00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:07.000
The Jesus lens, the context lens, the flourishing lens, and the fruitfulness lens.

00:08:07.000 --> 00:08:10.000
And these are going to be ways that we can come to Scripture

00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:14.000
and read it in a way that's a little more healing and has a healing impact on us.

00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:19.000
But each one shows or shapes just how we read the Bible.

00:08:19.000 --> 00:08:24.000
And it shows us how we see God, how we see people,

00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:30.000
how we see ourselves, and how eventually we react to relationships and other people.

00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:34.000
How loving we are or unloving we are.

00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:36.000
David Simmons says it like this.

00:08:36.000 --> 00:08:41.000
"Biblical literalism has never been about being faithful to the Bible,

00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:47.000
but about weaponizing selective parts of it to give a personally preferred interpretation

00:08:47.000 --> 00:08:52.000
the weight of God's full authority."

00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:57.000
literalism tries to make the Bible something it was never meant to be.

00:08:57.000 --> 00:09:05.000
It flattens poetry, metaphor, and story into one dimensional commands.

00:09:05.000 --> 00:09:10.000
It's like trying to read a love poem as a legal document.

00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:16.000
You might know every word, but you'll miss the heart behind it.

00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:21.000
It says if it didn't happen exactly this way then it can't be true.

00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:27.000
But the Bible is full of truths that are told through story.

00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:30.000
Parables, metaphors, symbols, imagery.

00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:36.000
When we get into the Jesus lens we're going to see that this is how Jesus taught.

00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:39.000
literalism doesn't make us more faithful.

00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:44.000
It often makes us less loving.

00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:48.000
When we read the Bible flatly we forget it's a library.

00:09:48.000 --> 00:09:55.000
It's a collection written by dozens of authors across thousands of years in different languages,

00:09:55.000 --> 00:09:58.000
cultures, and world views.

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:01.000
We start asking the Bible to be something that it's not.

00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:07.000
We start asking questions, trying to get answers, and it doesn't have them.

00:10:07.000 --> 00:10:11.000
How old is the earth?

00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:23.000
Where was Eden, when I was in Baghdad, on the south side of Baghdad in Iraq, everybody thought

00:10:23.000 --> 00:10:28.000
that the Garden of Eden was like 25 miles south of our base.

00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:30.000
That's where it actually was.

00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:31.000
It was in Iraq.

00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:33.000
It was 25 miles south of our base.

00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:34.000
I never got to go there.

00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:35.000
I was like it's 25 minutes.

00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:36.000
Let's go.

00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:37.000
But we never got to go.

00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:38.000
I don't know.

00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:39.000
Maybe it is.

00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:42.000
The belief that that's where the Garden of Eden was.

00:10:42.000 --> 00:10:48.000
If you think that the Garden of Eden is a very specific place on this place we call earth.

00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:54.000
Or did Jonah really live in a whale for three days?

00:10:54.000 --> 00:11:03.000
These are modern questions that ancient texts didn't give us the answers to even though we tried to get them.

00:11:03.000 --> 00:11:07.000
Genesis isn't trying to tell us how the world was made.

00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:11.000
It's telling us who made it and why.

00:11:11.000 --> 00:11:22.000
A scholar, Pete N. says, the question Genesis is prepared to answer is whether Yahweh, the God of Israel, is worthy of worship.

00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:26.000
That's the question it's trying to answer not.

00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:31.000
Was the earth actually created in 24 literal days?

00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:37.000
Because in science says, no, this place is so much older than that.

00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:39.000
There's a lot that has happened.

00:11:39.000 --> 00:11:44.000
And then we have to decide, do we believe just exactly literally what the Bible says?

00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:45.000
Or where's science?

00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:49.000
Where do we go with this?

00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:54.000
As Pete says, Genesis is not a science book.

00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:57.000
It is not trying to give us scientific answers.

00:11:57.000 --> 00:12:03.000
It's trying to ask the question and preparing us for the answer of is Yahweh, the God of Israel worthy of worship.

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:08.000
And literalism misses that completely.

00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:15.000
Part of how this idea, this literal reading of scripture, every single word is literal.

00:12:15.000 --> 00:12:17.000
It must be followed exactly.

00:12:17.000 --> 00:12:20.000
It's a modern Christian idea.

00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:25.000
The way that it came into modern Christianity was through this doctrine of inerrancy.

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:32.000
Inerrancy is this belief that the Bible is completely without error.

00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:41.000
In everything that it teaches, not only in spiritual or moral matters, but in history and science and every factual detail.

00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:44.000
It cannot have an error.

00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:54.000
And so in 1978, this group of shocking, primarily white theologians drafted what's called the Chicago statement on biblical inerrancy.

00:12:54.000 --> 00:13:03.000
So 1978 is when this became like a solid thing that we began to wrap Christianity around in our country.

00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:11.000
It was designed to protect the truth of scripture, but it also built a fence around how people were allowed to read it.

00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:21.000
If you don't affirm their exact version of inerrancy, you were labeled unfaithful or even heretical.

00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:34.000
And the message was clear, true Christians read the Bible literally, word for word, error-free, unquestioned.

00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:45.000
And I think Zach actually tells us in here how many, it was like 313 signatures I think were on this Chicago statement on biblical inerrancy.

00:13:45.000 --> 00:13:50.000
And 11 of them were non-white men.

00:13:50.000 --> 00:14:04.000
And it just, we talked about this last week that in seminary, most of the books, 97% of the books that are typically given out and read and learned from are written by white European men.

00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:14.000
And so there's a single lens that is thought to be the lens that you read scripture with when there's so many other things and cultures and ways to come to the scriptures.

00:14:14.000 --> 00:14:19.000
And a lot of us in this room, a lot of you, are not white men.

00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:33.000
And I can't say us, because sometimes I try not to be, but, but I am, alas, I am.

00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:39.000
Inerrancy wasn't an idea that Jesus taught, or that the early church held.

00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:47.000
They were modern attempts to make faith safe, certain, and controllable.

00:14:47.000 --> 00:14:51.000
You either believe this, or you're not a real Christian.

00:14:51.000 --> 00:15:01.000
A few years ago, I met with a non-profit organization here in town that helps feed kids.

00:15:01.000 --> 00:15:02.000
They help feed food to kids.

00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:07.000
They give kids and families that have food insecurities.

00:15:07.000 --> 00:15:16.000
They allow churches to come in and pack these boxes and then take them to families and give them to families so that kids have things to eat.

00:15:16.000 --> 00:15:19.000
It seemed like a perfect fit for us to partner with.

00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:21.000
It was something we could do.

00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:22.000
We could go in.

00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:24.000
We could spend a day in there packing these boxes.

00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:35.000
And then we'd have the opportunity in our neighborhood and in our community to go to families with food insecurities and hand them boxes of food.

00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:40.000
So I went in, had a meeting in the office with the VP here in town.

00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:47.000
And I was ready to work with him, say yes, and as I sat down at the table in his office, he slid across the table with this piece of paper.

00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:49.000
It wasn't a background check.

00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:53.000
It wasn't like, "Hey, here's the volunteer release form."

00:15:53.000 --> 00:15:56.000
It was a theological statement.

00:15:56.000 --> 00:16:05.000
And he said, "In order to be one of the churches that works with us as a partner, I need you to look at a theological statement, go through it, and you have to agree to it.

00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:08.000
If you don't agree to it, we can't work together."

00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:11.000
I was like, "Okay."

00:16:11.000 --> 00:16:23.000
So Paul opened it up, and the word and erancy of Scripture showed up in that statement more than any other word.

00:16:23.000 --> 00:16:37.000
And I read it and I was like, "So what you're saying is that I'm required to affirm the erancy and infallibility of Scripture and to sign my name on this in a very narrow, rigid definition of Scripture.

00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:42.000
Before we can help hand out food to hungry kids."

00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:45.000
I mean, just that part.

00:16:45.000 --> 00:16:49.000
If you wanted to come in and pack food here, you could do that.

00:16:49.000 --> 00:16:53.000
I was like, "Well, can I?

00:16:53.000 --> 00:16:58.000
What about quite a few people in our church or LGBTQ?

00:16:58.000 --> 00:17:00.000
Could they come in here and pack?"

00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:07.000
Well, yeah, they could come pack.

00:17:07.000 --> 00:17:12.000
It was like, I had just like, shocked, "Wait, what?"

00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:16.000
As long as we don't take pictures, right?

00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:28.000
And I was like, I actually was like, I said, "It doesn't sound like I'm trying to sign something about the gospel here.

00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:34.000
It sounds like you just want me to agree on inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture in order for us to partner together."

00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:38.000
And he goes, "I don't know about all those big words."

00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:43.000
I said, "It's your statement."

00:17:43.000 --> 00:17:48.000
This looks like John MacArthur wrote this statement.

00:17:48.000 --> 00:17:51.000
And I found out he did.

00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:59.000
And I was like, "There's no way. We cannot sign this. We cannot partner with you if this is what I have to agree with."

00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:03.000
And that really stinks because we just want to hand out some food to some kids.

00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:07.000
But it's your ministry and if that doesn't work, I get it.

00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:12.000
But I cannot sign this.

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:16.000
And we walked away from it.

00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:22.000
I think the most frustrating, never mind. Anyway, we won't go there.

00:18:22.000 --> 00:18:26.000
Say the thing.

00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:38.000
Okay, okay. At the time, one of our church members was one of their largest donors.

00:18:38.000 --> 00:18:43.000
And they didn't have to sign a statement in order to write a check, but we had to write a statement in order to hand out food.

00:18:43.000 --> 00:18:59.000
Anyway, so they would take your money not requiring your theology, but to give food to a child you had to align with their statement of belief.

00:18:59.000 --> 00:19:03.000
But that's what literalism lens does.

00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:08.000
It builds gates or Jesus built tables.

00:19:08.000 --> 00:19:15.000
It creates theological fine print that love has to sign before it's allowed in.

00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:26.000
And if that's what an erancy produces in practice, exclusion, gatekeeping, conditional compassion,

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:31.000
then maybe the problem isn't people's lack of belief in the Bible.

00:19:31.000 --> 00:19:37.000
Maybe it's that we've believed the wrong things about the Bible.

00:19:37.000 --> 00:19:40.000
We take off this literalism lens.

00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:45.000
We can finally see things like Genesis 1 through 3 for what it really is.

00:19:45.000 --> 00:19:54.000
It's not a rule book or a science report, but it's a revelation about the character of God.

00:19:54.000 --> 00:20:01.000
In the beginning of Scripture, Adam and Eve disobey, and what does God do?

00:20:01.000 --> 00:20:06.000
He told them, "If you eat of this tree, you will surely die."

00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:11.000
They eat of the tree and disobey, and do they die?

00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:13.000
Did God kill them?

00:20:13.000 --> 00:20:16.000
No, no, he comes in, he says, "Adam, where are you?"

00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:18.000
Adam says, "We are hiding. I'm naked."

00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:20.000
And God goes, "Who told you you're naked?"

00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:28.000
And then God actually creates clothing for them to cover up and help them with their shame.

00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:32.000
He covers their shame, and then he still walks with them.

00:20:32.000 --> 00:20:35.000
They don't die.

00:20:35.000 --> 00:20:41.000
Richard Rohr says it this way that every time God forgives,

00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:50.000
God is saying that relationship is more important than God's own rules.

00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:55.000
Now, if relationship is more important than God's own rules to God,

00:20:55.000 --> 00:21:01.000
then maybe that's also how we should operate.

00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:07.000
Every time God forgives, he says that this relationship is what matters the most.

00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:14.000
Literalism can't see that because it's too busy defending its system.

00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:20.000
When literalism becomes our lens, love becomes conditional.

00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:28.000
Faith becomes a checklist, and God becomes small enough to fit inside of our certainties.

00:21:28.000 --> 00:21:36.000
Literalism leads us to fear, while love will lead us to freedom.

00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:43.000
Literalism draws lines, and Jesus consistently crosses them.

00:21:43.000 --> 00:21:46.000
The goal isn't to throw away the Bible.

00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:49.000
It's to read it better.

00:21:49.000 --> 00:21:51.000
It's to be honest with our approach to it.

00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:54.000
It's to be honest with what the Bible was meant to be.

00:21:54.000 --> 00:22:03.000
To let it be what it actually is, its poetry and prophecy and story and song and lament and love.

00:22:03.000 --> 00:22:08.000
It's humans writing God's story.

00:22:08.000 --> 00:22:12.000
The literalism lens says obey first, then you belong.

00:22:12.000 --> 00:22:21.000
Jesus says you belong, you're loved, and that's what's going to transform you.

00:22:21.000 --> 00:22:27.000
We take off this lens that limits love.

00:22:27.000 --> 00:22:30.000
I think we get to choose one that helps us see more clearly.

00:22:30.000 --> 00:22:35.000
This is what we get in this book as Zach is helping us point out.

00:22:35.000 --> 00:22:44.000
Hey, here's the different parts of Scripture that maybe we've taken out of context.

00:22:44.000 --> 00:22:48.000
Or maybe we've said that it's something that it's not.

00:22:48.000 --> 00:22:55.000
Maybe there are not bears waiting in the woods to maul a bunch of children.

00:22:55.000 --> 00:23:00.000
Maybe someone made that story up.

00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:04.000
But what do we do with that?

00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:09.000
If we're not reading it this way, then what do I do?

00:23:09.000 --> 00:23:12.000
Well, that's what we're going to talk about the next few weeks.

00:23:12.000 --> 00:23:18.000
It's the other lenses, the ways that we approach Scripture where Jesus is the way that we read Scripture.

00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:26.000
We see what Jesus does and says we see who God is and what God does.

00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:29.000
We don't have to draw lines.

00:23:29.000 --> 00:23:37.000
If we draw lines and if we exclude people, then we're doing things that Jesus never did.

00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:45.000
If you want to be honest with it, you have to step back and say, which one's right?

00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:49.000
Or was God bipolar?

00:23:49.000 --> 00:23:56.000
Like the Old Testament is just a different God and the New Testament with Jesus is the nice one.

00:23:56.000 --> 00:24:01.000
I mean, you have to.

00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:04.000
You can't have it both ways.

00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:10.000
I mean, you can, but it's just not honest.

00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:14.000
So last week I gave you a practice.

00:24:14.000 --> 00:24:16.000
Who did their homework?

00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:17.000
Yes.

00:24:17.000 --> 00:24:19.000
One of you.

00:24:19.000 --> 00:24:20.000
Two.

00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:21.000
I got two.

00:24:21.000 --> 00:24:22.000
Two.

00:24:22.000 --> 00:24:23.000
Yes.

00:24:23.000 --> 00:24:29.000
I think I actually said it wasn't homework, but it was.

00:24:29.000 --> 00:24:31.000
I'm going to give you more homework.

00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:32.000
Another one.

00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:40.000
Another practice to open up Scripture with a fresh set of eyes.

00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:43.000
I want you to read Genesis 1 through 3.

00:24:43.000 --> 00:24:49.000
You may notice that there's two creation stories, one in Genesis 1, one in Genesis 2, and they don't actually line up.

00:24:49.000 --> 00:24:53.000
And you're going to be like, whoa, we were created twice.

00:24:53.000 --> 00:24:56.000
No, just it was written two different ways.

00:24:56.000 --> 00:25:00.000
And in Genesis 1 through 3 with your fresh eyes, don't ask, how did this happen?

00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:04.000
Ask, what does this reveal about who God is?

00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:10.000
Do you see how the different, the answer, the approach to this is different?

00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:14.000
Number two, notice where belief has become a barrier in your world.

00:25:14.000 --> 00:25:19.000
Ask, would Jesus stop here or keep moving toward love?

00:25:19.000 --> 00:25:29.000
I will tell you, if you start asking that question theologically and in practice, it's going to get you in trouble.

00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:33.000
Because you're just going to keep moving toward love, and keep moving toward love.

00:25:33.000 --> 00:25:36.000
And you're going to keep loving people and being compassionate with people.

00:25:36.000 --> 00:25:46.000
And it's going to be people that scripture or the way that interpretation of scripture maybe tells you they're not supposed to sit at the table.

00:25:46.000 --> 00:25:51.000
And then you look at Jesus and you go, but that's who he sat with.

00:25:51.000 --> 00:25:55.000
How?

00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:58.000
I know Jesus knew scripture.

00:25:58.000 --> 00:26:01.000
He knew the law.

00:26:01.000 --> 00:26:10.000
I was even told that Jesus was sinless, anybody else? But if you break the law, that was called a sin.

00:26:10.000 --> 00:26:13.000
What is Jesus so?

00:26:13.000 --> 00:26:17.000
Or maybe there's a different way to approach this.

00:26:17.000 --> 00:26:20.000
And maybe Jesus was showing us this.

00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:27.000
Maybe he was calling out the hypocrisy of how we were approaching scripture that talked about him.

00:26:27.000 --> 00:26:34.000
Maybe he was saying this story points to me and you've read me all wrong.

00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:40.000
And I'm here to show you who I really am.

00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:48.000
Brian Zahn says that Jesus is what God has to say.

00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:58.000
If we take Jesus and we take the written scripture, one of them is God's word to us as humanity.

00:26:58.000 --> 00:27:02.000
The other is supposed to point to the word.

00:27:02.000 --> 00:27:05.000
And I'll give you a hint.

00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:10.000
The word is a person, not. Words on paper.

00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:15.000
John says that in John 1 that the word was with God and the word was God.

00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:21.000
Jesus is the word of God. Jesus is what God has to say to you.

00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:25.000
We'll get into that in the Jesus lens. I'm jumping ahead.

00:27:25.000 --> 00:27:35.000
So, as you do this practice, and as you go this week, I want you to know that you are free.

00:27:35.000 --> 00:27:38.000
You're free to read scripture differently.

00:27:38.000 --> 00:27:41.000
You're free to bring your questions.

00:27:41.000 --> 00:27:47.000
Free to let go of fear based interpretations that made you feel small.

00:27:47.000 --> 00:27:51.000
You don't have to defend the Bible to love it.

00:27:51.000 --> 00:27:57.000
You don't have to understand every verse to encounter God through it.

00:27:57.000 --> 00:28:04.000
Reading the Bible with curiosity and compassion and imagination, it's not rebellion.

00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:10.000
It's actually faith at its most honest.

00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:18.000
Because what makes your reading sacred is not how literal it is.

00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:23.000
But how much love it produces.

00:28:23.000 --> 00:28:27.000
So, may you see scripture not as a weapon or a test.

00:28:27.000 --> 00:28:32.000
But as a living conversation between God and humanity.

00:28:32.000 --> 00:28:38.000
And an invitation to wonder, to wrestle and to grow.

00:28:38.000 --> 00:28:49.000
And may you find that as you let go of the need to be certain, you become more open to love.

00:28:49.000 --> 00:28:56.000
And then we do what we say every week, arsenal, just go love well.

00:28:56.000 --> 00:28:59.000
That's who we're meant to be.

00:28:59.000 --> 00:29:06.000
So, we do that this week. Walk into freedom that God loves you, that you belong,

00:29:06.000 --> 00:29:15.000
that every time God forgives, He says that that relationship is more important than even His own rules.

00:29:15.000 --> 00:29:19.000
Go allow Him to love you this week and then love well.

00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:22.000
That's who you're made to be. We'll see you next week.
