It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 03/29/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, technically, this is the end of my
week. That's so my plan was gonna be
something a little bit different.
And I failed to get it ready today,
but I wanted to run it by you
guys because I think the way I'm gonna
you know, feel like I've been kind of
working my way into this new kind of
schedule,
planning to do more consecutive work, possibly take
more days off in a row, but, you
know, five a week, two days off kind
of a plan. I'll I'll just keep you
guys informed. I'm gonna do what works for
me anyway. But at the end of the
day, I wanted to do something today, which
I thought would be interesting. To to be
clear, I'm I'm not gonna do. But I
wanted you guys to hear for for, next
week and and kinda get some feedback if
you think this would be good.
My problem is gonna be whether I'm gonna
choose to do this these days. But to
maybe do, like, an end of the week
wrap up of the week
and sort of outline all the different things
that I thought, like, the big story bullet
points in case you don't have time to
watch the longer shows or even just five
shows in a week, which there's a lot
of lot of people out there that don't
have the same time opening. And so maybe
there'll be a point where at the end
of the week, maybe I post it on
the Substack as well. So there's sort of,
like, a week wrap up, but just bullet
points with the links to the shows. And
I thought maybe the Sunday or whatever day
it ends up being on will be sort
of a few extra points with an overview
of those things to make it a shorter
day. I I just thought it would be
an interesting thing to get it sort of,
you know, the the the weekly work wrapped
up. But, again, I'm not gonna do that
today because as I sat down to do
that, there's some this this one story, which
I know you guys have all seen, I
obviously wanted to touch on.
And as I was going through this, it
was sort of it ended up largely being
something I want I want to go into
this about the White House app, which we're
gonna talk about today, which
it's spyware.
That's not a hyperbole. That's not it's my
opinion. It's like the definition of spyware is
spyware. And it's insane to me that that's
even happening. And I'm wondering whether that's an
accident or or, like, you know, they didn't
know it was the case and that means
somebody else's you know, all the thoughts. Right?
But then as I went through it, I
I'm you know, there's a lot that we
would wanna,
I guess, juxtapose with that, that we've already
talked about and a lot of some other
new things I wanted to include. And I
thought it would be good just to make
that a focus today, which probably won't even
be short. We'll see where we end up.
But I thought I and I'm I'm gonna
include some some, coverage about two things in
addition to that. I wanna make sure at
the end we we keep up today on
what what some points I wanted you to
see about Iran. Tomorrow, we'll get more in-depth
on some of the deeper conversation of that
developing illegal war. But I'm gonna start as
well with a point that I just thought
was interesting for
for a lot of reasons that you'll see.
They connect to a lot of what we
discussed today, but just in general that I
think is important for the sort of partisan,
you know, the aggressive manipulation that's taking place
in the partisan field today that is well
beyond anything I've ever seen before, at least
as I've been doing this. And that what
the point within that is to discuss the
no king's day point, which part of me
felt like it was largely because of the
it's more just a a propagandized story around
a lot of this, but it's important to
discuss for many reasons, including money and politics
and how important that is. And so that
point to start today, the bulk of which
will be Israeli spyware as its own story,
not even and not even to imply that
this is Israeli spyware in the White House
app because I'll I'll make the case when
we get there just about the obvious over
connect the, you know, connection between all of
this and what that may mean for where
we are. And then just a general point
about where Israeli spyware is in the world
and how Trump's administration has basically given it
a quiet comeback, and we're gonna go around
all that. And those are two separate stories.
But I'm sure you can connect the dots
on where these things may overlap.
Now let me know, as I said, what
you think about the wrap up point of
the weekly thing. I do curious what you
guys think and whether you'd rather just have
another in-depth show. But I'd like to hear
from both the the die hard long show
watchers as well as everybody just casual watchers
as well. But, you know, really,
this developing story
is bigger than just one app, one technological
manipulation.
There's a change, like and I I'm not
even talking about the technocratic conversation that we're
a lot having a lot. That's clearly a
part of this. But there's something about the
way this is all transitioning that it speaks
to something much much more alarming to me
and much more invasive, more insidious
as we're looking at something else, and this
is sort of happening behind the scenes. And
so I just want people to think about
that
long term play in all of this, including
with the foreign policy taking place today.
Now I wanna start out with one quick
point just to kind of
nod to,
you know, what the the off work point.
And I really wanted just to stress this
idea that this is one of the reasons
why I'm trying to reorganize the schedule so
this just doesn't utterly consume every second of
my life, which, by the way, I'm all
up for that. Like, that's my choice. I'm
choosing to you know, this matters to me.
You matter to me. And that's why it's
important for me to get involved in all
this to, you know, really
put my head down no matter what the
consequences are. That's how I look at it.
But at the same time, to do my
best to kind of organize it so I
have some semblance of a life on top
of this work. And so part of that
has to do with gardening and different things
I wanna do in the off time. So
I just put this out on on yesterday,
and I, you know, just want just wanna
show you guys that we are starting our
garden again this year. And that what you're
seeing here are just the small,
middle of the yard things we added on
in addition to the garden that we have
to to grow lettuce and other things. And
it's really nice to see it. My it's
it's really important, I think, that we do
this. And not only for the outlet,
to find reasons to get outside and, as
I said, touch grass. Right? Remember what we're
fighting for. But on top of that, just
to, you know,
find a reason, you know, the the outlet
to to to lose yourself in it. Like,
so part of it is to just get
involved in, oh, I mean, I guess the
the I I guess the two parts would
be to do that and then to do
it to prepare.
Not for some, you know, thirty seconds away,
we're all gonna die kind of event, all
that too, but just to be smart, to
be prepared, to be self sustainable. These aren't
necessarily we're all gonna die tomorrow kind of
thing. They're just intelligent, fat you know, being
prepared and making sure you can be sustainable
should something happen. You know, something that has
always ever happened in every historic you know,
I guess, confusing way to say that. There
will always be an event.
Every history, every currency,
there's never been a fiat currency that has
continued forever. Right? There will always be a
point at which something ends and collapses, and
it's just being prepared for that. It's been
a long time.
Let me give me some feedback here real
quickly. Let me know you guys can hear
me.
Let me double check, make sure this is
playing. I've some weird reason I'm just seeing
yeah. Doesn't look it's playing. Good. Good.
There some of the other platforms seem to
be acting funny. We just it's showing zero.
So let's get into this then. But on
that note, just again, you know, find that
time, guys. Whatever job you what you're doing,
whether it's this or something else, find the
time to do your best to break away
because we all need it, and it really
is important.
Now
this is something we're gonna get to after
the opening point. But just wanna throw it
out there for those that have already you
know, maybe you just caught the beginning and
you just wanted to I just want this
in somebody's mind out there. Derek
wrote this article twenty twenty four, November thirtieth.
Meet the spyware companies prepared to unleash their
tech during Trump's second term. Now this is
important for Mitt whether the app came out
or not. And I just wanted to, one,
demonstrate our value yet again that if had
we been focused on these things, and I'll
even make the point that had we been
focused on the people who were covering this
long before TLAB was ever talking about it,
long before I was ever doing this. Same
point applies
that we had an opportunity to maybe stop
some of these things that are happening. And
this is not necessarily the at point, but
just the idea that this kind of stuff,
spyware, Pegasus spyware,
Paragon Solutions, NSO Group, all kind of the
same point, it is exploding
and and literally has blended in to the
background of a
Virginia based, US based company.
I'll show you. It's called Red Lattice, and
it literally has blended between like, so, basically,
this is something that was being kicked aside
because everyone in the world was calling it
what it was, a a fraudulent criminal. I
mean, like, this was this was the one
that's important right here. Oops. The wrong one.
We'll come back to all these. But just
for people to remember, they were literally caught,
an Israeli spyware firm caught by other governments
for hacking, for spying on journalists.
This is quite literally the same stuff that
is immersed with US institute industry
and government,
literally.
So that point being there, I think, is
relevant for when we get into the app
and whatever's behind it, which appears to be
other companies we'll talk
about. Just realizing that this is something for
the point of stopping the stuff that we
had an opportunity to stop, to push back
on. But so many screening partisans out there
stop people from caring about what really mattered.
Always.
So let's start with that point. The idea
of partisanship and how insane this all
is. Now, this is an important thing that
we talked. We we know we touched on
this before. I mean, only important in my
mind insofar as that we discussed the reality
of of protesting and and constitutional rights and
the manipulation within all of that and how
governments will always try to manipulate, gaslight, astroturf
every single chance they get. And if we
can just accept that basic reality, verifiable throughout
my entire time doing this ever since I've
started,
then we can acknowledge that it's not one
side or one group or one thing. Now,
yes, clearly, whatever topic you pick, there's gonna
be a slant. Maybe or, you know, a
a 1% difference or a 100%. And at
some point, it's gonna either be you know,
it's always a mixed bag, in my opinion,
and it's gonna lean one way or the
other. Doesn't always mean that it's one thing
or the other only.
And within that, in every topic we deal
with, you get political partisans who are aggressively
trying to misrepresent
everything for their benefit, for you know, and
and their personal benefit and their political team
benefit. So this topic is interesting because last
time, what what did we hear? Incessantly.
Not like, for weeks,
they're gonna you know, like, basically, fever pitch,
the country is gonna collapse.
Burning things down, murder, you know, violence,
dangerous, and even the even the suggestion that
it was somehow also overlap with foreign entities.
The same old you know, just you pick.
The same story. Now any of those things
you shouldn't deny either or rather
disregard, you should consider while looking for evidence.
The point is you can clearly see as
any other major event, whether
organized from that point starting point or not,
was eventually
influenced, funded by plenty of big political
organizations,
PACs, whatever.
But the point was, which that we'll get
into some why that matters in a second,
because we should and we should care. We
should take note of what group seems to
be influencing whatever we're dealing with because organic
anything today seems to be part of the
story, if any. Right? The point being is
even an organic thing will start and things
will get manipulated. People can show up on
their own accord and join it and always.
So we shouldn't assume one way or the
other. But last time, what happened? Nothing. There
was zero violence, which that could have been
the plan from the coordinated event, which ultimately
at that point, what difference does it make?
You know, we we we'll get into this.
The idea being that there was nothing that
they hyped
even to where the it ended up being
some kind of, oh, well, that's, you know,
I'm not to get into all the dumb
stuff. The point is that it ended up
being not violent.
The only real main events that happened were
because of MAGA protesters
doing things to the people that were there.
And that's not to say that that's the
violent side. As it goes both ways, guys,
if you're not ridiculous and you pay attention
just barely beyond one administration,
you'll see that it goes both ways. Like,
anybody I've ever talked to who does this
nonpartisan perspective
work will agree because it does. And I
make this point when we get into this
right now about what we saw from the
Republican side of this. What's important to me
is that we understand what this seems to
be doing.
Even if every claim they're making is correct,
when a crime is committed and there's something
that people then then go for it. Go
after it. Otherwise, if there's not a crime
and you've got major political institutions which are
which are funding and gaslighting and astroturfing, then
call it out.
The the point is that every single side
does this today, and the reality is if
we start to say they can't do this
or the point of just anybody because that's
what it comes down to. You think you're
gonna stop Elon Musk from pro dumping money
into things, the Koch brothers, or George Soros
is in? No, you're not. Because that's gonna
continue to happen. I I will agree with
anybody that that is a problem in this
situation. The answer is not to say stop
that from happening because what happens then is
we
cannot coordinate.
So, hypothetically, if I'd gone out to this
no kings protest myself personally in Nashville and
walked out there, would I suddenly be a
Democrat operative? I don't mean the people who
wanna pretend that's the case. I mean, as
an independent,
nonpartisan person, I had half a mind to
go out and just see what was going
on, whether I support it or not. Would
I then become a Democrat operative?
Because that's the kind of game that's being
played. They're all shills, and it's all paid
for, and it's all x, y, and z.
And that's just dumb.
So let's go through this with an open
mind and recognize that there's 100
political manipulation taking place. And my mind, especially
for those that are, you know, in addition
to what I was gonna say and and
see it as the full
two party illusion reality,
that there's a game being played to get
you to attack the other side. So, my
point on top of all of it is
that even if everything you're saying is true,
the game is only to get you to
drive and take action against your neighbor,
not the government who's playing both sides against
each other. That's always the point. And I
frankly think that most people see that today.
That's why it's becoming harder and harder for
these things to gain any momentum because immediately
people like us are like, well, skeptical.
Question it. You know? Not not don't don't
blindly take any of it at face value.
And so everyone's coming into it with a
level of skepticism, and we're watching for things.
So let's start with this clip.
I mean, even to my point is I
I try to, like, kinda get a quick
encapsulation to start. Is that even that, you
know, there's somebody that's gonna be hearing that
and think that I left out a certain
part that causes x, y, and z, you
know, and I probably from an honest place.
I just wanna really stress that whether I
included everything or not, which we'll go through
here,
you know, you don't have to believe me,
question me, but this is coming from a
place that is not taking a side.
This is not about one group versus the
other. This is not about left versus right.
It's not about no kings. It's about any
group, left or right, Republican or liberal or
Democrat, whatever,
who want to stand up whether or not
they know a thing is manipulated or whether
it is or not, and simply
express themselves.
Go out there with a sign they made
or one they bought or somebody gave them
when they walked up and say, I don't
think this is right. If we can't allow
that, if we get to a point to
where anybody even doing that, whether of their
own volition or not, is somehow now suspect
because of the partisan game, we have lost.
It's over, at least in regard to whatever
this experiment it is. And that's really important
to think about because the ability for us
to go out and speak our minds freely
is so important in this situation. And I
just think I mean, think about what happened
at January 6 and think about how clearly
anybody who's this is important for those that
wanna think this is about me secretly being
on one side or the other. You know
how vocally we stood up for the people
of January 6, how continually to this very
moment, even with recent people who I think
were pretending to be more objective and more
open minded to things, too partisan government, whatever,
who got immediately angry when the argument became,
well, I don't think that represents most conservatives.
Oh, the magma morons and all the it
was like, well, reality for me was that
there was a core group of people that
were very manipulative. That's very clear, Very aggressive,
and there was a lot within there that
connected back to all sorts of government things.
You know, go into the capital. But the
vast majority that I could see were just
conservatives
who genuinely, whether right or not, whether correct
or not, believed that they were stolen from,
believed that there was something they were doing,
something they were standing up for that mattered.
Anybody that committed violence, there's a crime. You
could call them out, arrest them, including the
government who shot somebody or the person who
broke in. The point is so clear, guys.
It's easy to see how this will go
in the direction
which is anti American, which is against
the ability to do any of this. Now
what she what this is gonna be
is a clip from somebody. It's a part
of a clip. It's, like, seven minute segment.
I watch most of it, but it doesn't
really add that much more except for the
point that they're just, it's very petty, the
politics you get from left and right today,
CNN, Fox News. It's always very derisive in
making fun of them. There's no real effort
to be objective and make it sort of
which, hey, all fairness, I do that half
the time too because we're talking about people
that I think are ridiculous. So, maybe that's
what they think. Maybe I should stop doing
that. The point is that when you're watching
this, I think it's very clear to see
that instead of coming at this like, these
people could be out there doing their own
thing or this could be paid, it comes
out, well, they make fun of the the
age.
Are they taking metamu
metamucil? And, like, you know, they're meant to
completely laugh at what they're doing instead of
recognize that what they're doing is a foundational
part of this country, that journalism is supposed
to be a part. You get the point.
So what he is saying, or what she's
saying, rather, he's reporting on is that this
is something that is paid for billions and
billions of dollars. And and she she doesn't
make it. I'll let it speak for itself.
It's not some very manipulative thing other than
the implication
that this then undermines the overall point. Let's
watch it first. These 500 groups
with, get this, a $3,000,000,000
budget
collectively.
And where does their, you know, political influence,
their political contributions,
and their,
you know, individual employee
donations go, but mostly to the Democratic party?
And that's why we see the silence. And
and, unfortunately, they pull their punches on the
issues that matter to you, for example, that
you just cited because
that would mean turning against the democratic
politicians that they're trying to keep in power.
So great to have you with us today,
Kevin.
So
Sibley, you know, the things that you decide
to care about, well, okay, let's take a
step back and realize that people have different
things they care about. Right? So how dare
they not stand up and scream about the
things that you guys think they should scream
about, which is essentially what they talked about.
And, of course, you could argue because everybody
would care about this thing. Well, that's your
opinion, right, that they must have done it.
If they don't, that means they're hiding for
the Democrats. It's very subjective. They may be
the right. I just think it's really stupid
of us to listen to corporate media who
wants to give you subjective ideas when you're
supposed to be presenting this as a fact
based report. Now what you can discuss, which
we'll go over, including what what Grock's perspective
is on it, only from a partisan view
to understand that it's even what they're framing
for you from people like Eric Daugherty,
is about to try it's about trying to
make this sound invalid.
That's what this really comes down to.
Holy smokes, different than holy crap, but I
guess there's a varying level of importance.
It was just confirmed that no king's protests
are fun to oh, confirmed. Now this is
what I love. Now first of all, she
works for Fox News. The clip that he
was playing is a woman that works for
Fox News Digital. She comes on and makes
this statement, and then it ripples through. Now
I'm gonna take it at face value just
to make the point today. And I do
think there's but it's it's subjective for a
few reasons we'll get into. But realize that
these people do not verify this stuff. I've
proven this a 100 times over. It's now
confirmed because Fox said it out loud. You
mean the Fox News platform that gets just
as much wrong as CNN? They don't care,
guys. It's about the narrative control. It's about
team sport politics.
For Fox investigated and found,
Fox did, found it it's George Soros and
Neville,
Singham link groups and nonprofits. Well, actually, that's
not that's not as accurate. It's Soros was
a part of that.
And then, of course, Marxist groups were involved.
Communism, they were there for a revolution. Well,
okay. Well, what they're talking about, by the
way, are groups that showed up and protested
alongside them.
You know what I mean? And this is
what's so frustrating about this is, yeah, well,
it certainly could be something that they organized
because they believed in that, and that still
would be their right to protest that. Are
we gonna pretend like we didn't hear democrat
Republican screaming about revolution, about overthrowing the government?
Yeah. Because they both did it. It's just
silly that we act oh, my talk to
my pearls about when they say the things
that we were just screaming.
Because they're the bad ones, because we can
all tell. Right?
The point though, on top of that, is
that these groups are like anywhere else can
show up. So people have a massive protest,
a nationwide protest. Do you think that literally
everybody that walked into this protest were just
all apart? People walked from the streets and
stood up there. Maybe they have their own
personal things to call for. So people there
that are protesting for anything, you the assumption
that everything said anywhere in this group is
indicative of what the organization wants you to
think is gotta be the dumbest argument in
the conversation today. It could, and I wouldn't
deny that, but it also could be a
group that showed up and brought their signs
and said, Here's what I think on top
of that, that they just mashed together because
it's all politics. It's even frustrating that we
have to go through these very basic understandings
of, you know, just objectivity,
but that's what we have to do today.
So
the money is interesting.
Here is
what Grok had to say about this first
in regard to the,
oh, what I asked this was I forgot
about this one. So, basically, the first point
was, you know, the difference between Republican
election protests or whatever else and what they're
doing. Not the money necessarily. We're gonna get
into that second because what's one point that's,
like, almost intentionally ignored is dark money,
which seems to be very, very prevalent on
the Republican side of this conversation. It's everywhere,
really. But when it comes to, like, for
example, what just happened with No Kings, it's
all pretty public, which I think speaks for
itself. I don't mean that it's that means
it's not,
riddled with corruption.
But it just means that it's very different
when you have a group who's, like, it's
all out there, but you're gonna tell me
it's some shadowy, manipulative thing when it's all
posted publicly and you can look at it.
Then over here, you have, for example, specifically,
in regard to the stop the steal stuff.
Well, like, the majority of that was dark
money. You can't really see what and how
much.
That matters. It could very well be 30
times that or not or half of it.
You don't know. That's the point. But this
and this was in regard to the comparison,
Claiming an ecosystem of roughly 500 organizations with
a combined 3,000,000,000 annual revenue was what she
was arguing.
Now this is from their investigation, so it
should be taken with a grain of salt
like anything should. In this case, though, we're
talking about 500 different organizations
that they claim as a combined
$3,000,000,000
in annual revenue.
That's quite a bit different than they put
$3,000,000,000
into this, which is what everyone's basically now
saying. Isn't that different? It is different. On
top of the fact that it's 500
organizations.
So to me I mean, okay. Let's just
for for,
mental,
an exercise.
Hypothetically,
let's say I stood up right now and
said, hey. I have a problem with what
our government is doing. Not left or right,
but the whole damn thing, and I wanna
I wanna coordinate a massive protest to stand
up and say, look. Because you know what
I think? I think we all see it.
I think I genuinely mean this right now.
Most of us, I think, are seeing even
through the two party paradigm to some degree.
So I wanna start something. I rather, like,
you know, next week or a year, a
month from now, I wanna have a massive
nationwide stand up where we all stay. We
see this, and we're protesting. Okay. And then
it just kinda spirals. It gets crazy, and
people start funding and different groups step in.
I can't control everything that happens around that
And all but the the sentiment was what
started it. And then suddenly, or even just
groups that I create or maybe I'm part,
500 different organizations step in and go, we
agree with that. We wanna stand by these
principles or whatever. Like, you could even say
that now it starts to get muddled with
people manipulating it. Oh, they wanna do this,
but they wanna bring in their partisanship. I
can't control somebody who's doing this in an
organic way can't control all that. Hypothetically, the
point is, let's say 500 groups got involved.
And that amounts to a bunch of money.
And we stand up and have a massive
protest that we're calling out that we don't
want the government to be doing these illegal
things. No violence happens, and it's all over.
Now but I mean and let's just say
that's exactly what happened, that it was me
that started the whole damn thing. Now you
could easily pretend to frame that however you
wanted. But let's just say we know for
a fact that it was me. Now would
you call that some kind of gas lit
astroturf situation? And how would that be any
different? Now it may be unlikely that it
would get as large, especially with censorship and
suppression, but isn't that possible? Like, wouldn't we
like to believe that in a world where
people are genuinely starting to see it? Like,
let's tack on one thing.
Let's say we're at a point where with
not my opinion. Let's say we are at
a point where we know for a fact,
which, shit, I think we're there,
most Americans start are seeing all of this,
are seeing the problem. And let's just say
we can prove that.
80%, 90% of Americans are like, these are
dictators. We're done.
Then we go and we all march out
in the streets.
How do so what's so shouldn't we hope
that we get to that point? Shouldn't we
be going, well, that means that we're all
agreeing that we see the problem? Okay. So
now take a step back and compare that
to what this is. I'm not saying that's
what this was. But you see, now we
step into a world where how in the
hell do we know anymore? When everything that's
organized because they've got signs, it must be
what Trump said, nothing means anything. It's all
protest gaslit. It's either Soros or it's Elon.
It's either the Koch brothers or the whatever.
I'll go through the names in a second.
And then all of a sudden, it all
means nothing. Then we no longer have any
real effort to show the world that we
don't see. And, you know, I'm the one
that's often pointed to the
diminished influence of protesting,
but I've never said it was not important.
I've never said it was not that it
would it has a purpose, guys. Now, maybe
I'm belaboring the point, but I'll tell you,
this seems important to me. The general idea
of what they're driving at and what they're
trying to hide or, you know, it's it's
like jury nullification or any number of things
that people don't even know about anymore because
they've driven us to a direction where we
don't even talk about it. How long until
we just suddenly stop? You know, well, any
protest means politics, they spend money and they're
cheating.
Telling you guys, I see where this is
going. Like a lot of other things we've
saw years before it actually started to happen,
and we tried to call attention to it
and had a moment to stop it and
people didn't listen. It didn't happen. Not making
it all about us. There's plenty of us
that are doing that. Independent media, IMA.
But back to
this point. So 500 different organizations combined with,
combined
annual revenue of $3,000,000,000
was involved in sponsoring and supporting them.
And it's very sporadic.
It's tied to left leaning funders like like
George Soros, that was one of many,
Neville Roy Singham.
Right? So you have these specific groups
that took part,
that then you got people like Eric and
the rest who are broadly brushing the entire
thing as one group.
Stop the steal rallies featured groups like Turning
Point USA, a very, very, very influential and
very wealthy organization, which pretty sure we can
all see right now, maybe it was different
before, is, you know, problematic.
$300,000
described as the lion's share in some reports.
Smaller amount, absolutely. But there's we'll get to
a point about why this is different
in all in all sides of it. Even
including right now, it could be way more
than 3,000,000,000.
Billionaires on both sides.
So if it's really if it's not about
necessarily the money but the influence, which is
what we're talking about, the money is just
an example. Right? The money
is an identifier. Here is a here is
a mechanism they're using to influence the outcome.
Money is one of them. There's plenty of
others we've talked about. But so, the more
money, the more it goes, Wow. Okay. They
really put something into that. Right? So but
what we're talking about is the influence. That's
the issue. Right? So when you've got billionaire
influencers and financiers,
fake,
philanthropists,
then it's the same conversation.
Koch brothers,
Teal, Adelson's,
how whatever this one is, Oolinese
or
Ulhealdens? How wait. Am I am I reading
that wrong?
E Helens? That's weird last name. But then,
Soros, Singham, others, Tide Foundation. Yeah, man. It's
both sides if we're not lying to ourselves.
What's also interesting is how little pushback you
get from people on the other side while
this get why? Because I think that's part
of the game. Right now, we're supposed to
be focusing this way. Just like before, we
were supposed to focus the other way.
Coordination happens. This is interesting. Rallies don't materialize
in a vacuum, Grok writes. Social media, existing
activist list, buses, permit shared. Like, they're simply
saying, this is what has always happened. We've
just decided to sort of over fixate on
the parts that are clearly being abused by
wealthy people to act like it was never
you know, it's just it's weird to me
how much this has been going on. And
it says, in short, it's not fundamentally different
in the mechanisms of funding, left or right,
coordination, billionaire, nonprofit involvement. American politics runs on
this mix of genuine passion,
professional organizing, and big money from allied donors.
I don't that's not how I would want
it to be, but that's where we are.
The hypocrisy is real. Outrage over astroturf
usually depends on whose ox is gored. And
the point is that they're just saying
it's both sides do it, and even Grock
will tell you that. Now let's get into
the point of why it looks or can
look different. I'll just include this. It explains
very detailed what dark money is. Just understand
it means money that is not able to
be seen or traced back to the person.
Right? That's what a lot of these packs
were originally kind of designed to do or
rather, did, like,
disconnect it from direct donations to the politician.
Now it's got to the point to where
it's you can find ways to do it
where you can't even be seen doing it.
All this is is a continual,
you know, bloating of the problem.
So here's what Fox News reported. 500 groups
with 3,000,000,000 in revenues.
See? Yet you're still hearing that they put
$3,000,000,000 in. This is not what that says.
Or behind the no kings protest. See? It's
different. But the money is still being used,
some of the money. The point is 500
groups, which have 3,000,000,000 in revenue annually,
were supporting this.
I'm I'm not getting I'm not able to
find specifics on this because everything's so mired
in nonsense today, but I doubt it's $3,000,000,000
in total based on the statement being their
500 group that were supporting this collectively make
3,000,000,000 in annual revenue. So I kinda find
it unlikely, but, you know, certainly possible.
And, of course, it says pro protests and
communists call for revolution. You mean, like like,
every day of their lives? Yeah. So the
difference is that they showed up and said
it here. Okay. Big deal. I mean, let's
be real about this. The game is so
ridiculous right now. Are we not talking about
I mean, are you you mean oh, you
mean while you're literally supporting your own government,
just knocking governments around the world and over
time, you know, murdering and killing? But, yes,
you know, they're bad for wanting to stop.
You know, it's I don't agree with their
politics. I don't want communism. I don't want
any government, frankly. But it's funny for me
that people can gripe and clutch their pearls
about these people with their views calling for
revolution while you're literally cheering on a genocide,
you utter hypocrite.
But a network of about 500 groups with
an estimated 3,000,000,000 in combined annual revenues. Oh,
estimated. Funny how more abstract it keeps getting
the more you dig into the story. It's
behind the coordinated nationwide no kings protest Saturday.
A network.
So let's be clear about the what they're
actually saying is a group of people who
individually in some ways part so were influencing
funding some elements of this thing that we
call a network because which let me be
clear. I do think it's a network. I
think we're talking about people who tend to
come together when they want to organize these
things in many ways for their benefit. It
does not mean the individuals on the street
don't care about what they're fighting for, But
but it is views just like it is
the other side. But you could argue that
it maybe not be, that it's just an
a grouping of people that they then call
a network. So I'm just being objective, but
I I would agree. I do think that
they're interconnected behind it. And it says, calling
for revolution
according to what she said. I already addressed
the communism port.
According to a copy of the permit for
the flagship march, of course, big surprise. Out
of all the different nationwide protests, she went
to Minnesota.
I wonder why. In and the group is
called Indivisible.
A a national, well heeled, democratic,
political advocacy organization funded by George Soros is,
as the Fox News reports,
the lead coordinator for the protest.
So it's it seems the Indivisible group is
the one they're making the focal point. That's
the group. The one that they so if
it's a network, the argument is that's the
group that is executing this from the head
of the network.
So I find that interesting. Right?
So
Indivisible, did it fund every protest that we
happened yesterday according to Grock? No. It did
not fund every protest.
Indivisible, a progressive grassroots network, played a major
court dating and organizing role in many events,
Not even the majority. They hosted or promoted
numerous local rallies on their site, provided tools
for finding protests.
So,
well, just a website. Helped with permits, sound
equipment safety in some cities, like San Francisco,
and co led the broader coalition effort.
Not the same thing as making this about
some, you know, very different, I would argue.
And this is the protest formed a decentralized
coalition involving Indivisible,
publicly, by the way,
the five zero five zero one movement, the
50 states to be protest, one movement, labor
unions across the country, other groups like ACLU,
Democratic Social of America, Third Act, move on,
hundreds more. Hundreds more.
Hundreds more. Now whether you agree with their
politics
or not,
whether you think that what they think they're
fighting like, the idea that it it's like,
for example, the Democrat socials of America. I
could go through forever and point out people
within that that I think are dishonest or
people that are but why is the inherent
opinion that because they have that belief that
they're evil and want bad things?
Can you not factor in as an adult
that maybe they believe that's a good thing,
That they think this is the right thing
for this country? And maybe they're even wrong.
I would agree that. I would say they're
wrong.
But it's funny how we get into this
childish game where it is, they're the evil
socialist and they wanna bring the country down
to its knees. It's like, okay. Why would
they cheer for what so they wanna destroy
their own life? That certainly doesn't make sense.
The problem is is they train this as
all or nothing all the time.
Hundreds of different groups were involved.
That has to matter.
You could still argue it's a completely organized
government propaganda psyop. I I would absolutely consider
that. It has to matter, though, that the
way they always do it is make it
some one focal ridiculous cartoonish hyperbolic point. Organizers
claimed over 8,000,000 participants
across 3,300
different events in all 50 states.
Now like I said before,
this could very well be because this is
something that they made happen, or it could
be and we should actually this isn't the
same as me saying, for example, even though
I think I know what Trump is, that
I I hope I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
I genuinely hope that he does everything you
want because most of what you're saying, I
want to happen.
Maha, stuff like that. Of course, anybody
genuinely wanting the better for this country should
want most of those things.
I'll hope for that. You see the difference?
But so in this case, we should be
hoping
that this is a genuine event
of
people who genuinely wanna make this country you
know, genuinely wanna stop what is obviously an
authoritarian,
complete dictatorial
direction from this government.
I it's not that's not a partisan opinion.
It's it's textbook
literal definitions. But the end of the point
being is that if this was possible, then
we should be hoping that that is actually
happening
instead of just assuming that it's all one
thing because this Fox News person said out
loud, making it one of the largest single
day protest mobilizations in US history. Now you
wanna look around the world,
look at what's going on in our country,
and not and and tell me that you
don't see an inflection point right now, a
point in our history that's different than just
about any other time or at least at
the level of other major events throughout history?
What we're dealing with, guys, if you haven't
heard, is a massive transition of our society.
A a genuine manipulation, the great reset, build
back better, all left and right. It's the
same damn thing, and you can't it's it's,
like, it's, like, identical with slightly different narratives
with Trump and, I guess, even in his
own way, trying to enshrine himself with that
new future. Well, literally, people acting like that's
not the most obvious globalist agenda we've ever
seen.
I just think that would be a time
to see a massive
record breaking protest of people who and and
here's the last thing to add to this
before I stop because I I I think
that it's important to hear this, but
I'm of the mind based on what I've
seen personally and just talk to other people
about that this this these protests, whether you
wanna call it no kings or other things
are on ice, are not only Democrats. In
fact, far as I can tell, it seems
mostly people who are seeing through all of
it.
You could probably argue, I would agree, that
it slants to the left. Just like during
COVID, it slanted to the right because of
obvious reasons, just because of who's in power.
But I'm telling you guys right now, I
believe that this is mostly people who are
it's not about left and right. It's about
people that are going, okay. This is a
problem,
and finding a reason to stand up for
it against it. Many events were driven by
other partners, community groups, ad hoc local organizers.
Not every protest listed in by listed Indivisible
as the primary sponsor.
That certainly matters to me, doesn't it?
Broader broader, funding details. Broader funding reports describe
the network of roughly 500 groups with combined
annual revenues. 3,000,000,000. I just wanna make sure
you hear that because that is not the
same thing that people are reporting.
Grants,
union dues, individual small donations, other progressive donors.
Now look, I'm not taking all of this
at face value.
What I remember, my point in doing this
is this is what Grok is telling you.
This is what Elon is literally
manipulating to the point to where it freaks
out every other day. And it still says
this. So take that into account. Other progressive
donors, including some type of Neville Roy, the
one they were referencing, or certain left line
organizations,
critics, Fox News investigations, and so on,
highlight this as evidence of astroturfing,
which it could be of top down funding,
while organizers framed it as broad based bottom
up resistance. It's probably somewhere in the middle.
Guys, probably a little bit of both. But
if you're an honest person, you would demand
evidence
for a claim like that. Not just, well,
because they're there and that's a thing we
disagree with, they've obviously.
That's the level of journalism you're getting from
corporate media and mainstream alternative.
No public evidence shows a single pot of
money from an Indivisible covering every local event,
which I'm not even no one's actually technically
well, I shouldn't say that. There's plenty of
the ridiculous mainstream alternative media saying that. But
from the main reporting, that's but that's the
that's the insinuation,
which is how this tends to go.
And it says, yeah, covering every local cost
or, you know, what are the signs, transportation?
Many were low budget volunteer driven gatherings in
small towns or parks.
In short, Indivisible was a key national player
coordinator, which is clear, for the the branded
elements,
but the day revolved wide coalition as as
we read already. They did not literally find
or control every part of the country's aspect.
Here's the Tennessean. No Kings protest draws huge
crowds in Nashville. Another no Kings protest against
president Trump and his administration drew huge crowds
in Nashville on Saturday. The protest was one
of thousands happening across the nation with 40
alone in Tennessee.
40 in different locations just in Tennessee.
I mean, it's I mean, look. I'm not
gonna pretend like this couldn't easily be manipulated,
but think about what you're saying. So now
you're telling me that, apparently, it's like, 7,000,000
plus, 8,000,000 as it said. They're they're all
paid? Is that really what you're trying to
argue right now? That seems a little bit
insane.
Certainly some. I think it happens every time.
But stop falling for these hyperbolic partisans, guys.
And I look. My opinion at this point
is I think partisan is a dirty word.
I mean, I've genuinely and I don't mean
people that just have a a leaning, but
people who are playing the team sport game,
we're, it's we're that line's been drawn. We
need to move past that and just it's
it's these are these are not serious people,
in my opinion.
Signs decrying the war in Iran,
the Epstein files, the administration's heavy immigration enforcement,
and cuts to education funding dominated the demonstration.
So think about this. You're gonna tell me
you think these people are being paid by
Democrats and they're out there going, release the
Epstein files? Aren't you the ones telling us
they're the ones hiding it?
See, there's easy ways to see through this.
The point is it's a mixed bag. Quote,
We're here to oppose the authoritarian posturing of
this administration,
which has very clearly, at several instances, signaled
that they believe they have a right to
do whatever they like to do.
True. He said and he said, and, quote,
we're here to protest their series of constitutional
abuses. Guys, if you can't acknowledge
that they have violated the constitution, then you're
just a child in this conversation because even
the leading people in the MAGA team sports
side of this, I shouldn't call it MAGA
anymore,
are the ones that are telling you. It's
we need to ignore that part of the
constitution because we have to get past this
problem. Because that was their actual argument. So
if you're coming into this going, it's not
a problem, then you're just not you just
step sit down. You're not a part of
the conversation. And it says like ice in
our streets, abducting people with no identification,
no just cause, which I can show you
15 examples for off the top of my
mind. I just I show I just showed
Reitz, who was a US veteran after Bon
Bovino lied to Derrick Rose on his interview.
It says, and they're actively breaking the law
at every moment that they do not release
the Epstein files
related to elites elitists in the pedophile ring.
So there's your Democrats, ladies and gentlemen. George
Soros funded, apparently, as we're hearing from Fox.
We're telling you they are holding back their
lipstine files, and they're breaking the law by
not putting it out. You know who's leading
that charge? Thomas Massie. Because they are breaking
the law by not putting it out.
Matters to me, guys. Now it says, it's
not the first time I know King's protest
has taken place in Nashville.
Thousands,
excuse me, gathered for protests at the Bicentennial
Mall in June 2025.
Right? The same day as Trump's birthday in
a massive bill tape parade in Washington, DC.
There was also no King's protest that drew
a large crowd at the Tennessee Capitol in
October. Guess what? None of them have been
violent.
Sort of matters, doesn't it, with all the
hype that we've been getting? That's not to
say that it can't be or wouldn't be
or, you know, they're not capable of it.
It just means that there wasn't. That's the
only thing it meant. And that matters.
Now here, the, Svetlana Lokova and a lot
of other people, this is what she's putting
out. As I explained earlier last year, as
proven by this other text that I wrote,
because that makes sense, Snow No Kings is
not organic, but it's part of a Soros
element of CIA Jake Sullivan color revolution against
president Trump. Certainly possible.
Anyone that would deny that that's not possible
is not serious either because absolutely,
we have psychological
operations, you know,
color evolution dynamics. We're all like what we're
literally seeing them try to do in Iran,
guys. That's the point.
So you should consider this.
Now if there's no evidence to back that
up and it's more of a patched together
elements of, well, we know this wouldn't happen
if this wasn't like, the you know, well,
we know since Biden was seen now, that
means they have to. That's not intelligence, guys.
That's blind self serving assumption.
So in this case, whether or not it's
not organic, it should we should care about
that. Soros is an element here, but so
were the other 500 plus groups that funded
all over the country. And the idea of
CIA Jake Sullivan there's there's no evidence here.
This is just her opinion based on this
idea that they all high five about, which
does it's like everything else. It's like Nick
Shirley. It's the same same thing.
This is just someone saying you're you're lying
every day. Here
is a muse, account that gets things wrong
constantly, by the way. Relationships about sharing whatever
the current thing is, and they're wrong all
the time, like anybody in a partisan field
that blindly repeats what the team says. No
kings. Bought and paid for by China, apparently.
Now it's China. Well and, you know, you
you find interesting overlaps to China in regard
to funding. But guess what, guys? You probably
could find funding overlaps everywhere.
If you put on set something like this
happens. Right? If you have a massive nationwide
element,
there are a lot of people that try
to get involved for a thousand reasons because
it's very large, because there's advertising, because there's
people that wanna be because it's being discussed.
So it could very well be the whole
thing was put on by China. That I
I would never dismiss something like that. But
simply seeing this graph that they put out
from Fox News that shows new people's war,
how money flows from Shanghai, cash from Shanghai
based Neva Roy, Singh, moves to step by
step. Oh, okay. So this guy who wants
to see communism, who showed up and protested
saying we want revolution, got funding from China.
Therefore, it's all China, guys.
Because don't you just see how obvious that
is? Don't just don't don't, you know, don't
worry about skipping those 17 steps in between
that that would necessitate
verification,
documents. You know what I mean? Facts. Who
cares? Just jump right to whatever makes sense
for the team.
Now to be clear with my facetious comments,
I'm not suggesting, like I said, that I
think it's not possible. I'm simply saying that
this is the kind of nonsense you get
from partisans who are playing a team game.
As if now it's brought to you, paid
for by China? These are not serious people,
guys.
Libs of TikTok
to demonstrate that point.
Oh my god,
this journalist says. OMG.
Man claims he was paid $50 to hold
a sign of no kings protest. Follow the
money that this unidentifiable,
anonymized
screenshot
that who knows if they even like, for
all we know, somebody sent them this, which
I'm almost willing to bet you that's what
happened. Do you really think Libs would black
out their name? Somebody sent them an image
in my opinion, and they just posted it
because, hey, it works for what I like.
Like, they get I mean, I can't even
count the times, but I've physically laughed out
loud on this show about things that lives
of TikTok got fantastically wrong.
But whatever. I mean, as we should probably
like Matt Agaras down here says, oh, that
doesn't matter. That was a different one, actually.
I'm gonna get you a point where he
comments underneath the,
what the app point we're getting to next.
But it says, how much are they paying
for holding signs asking for a friend? This
guy says, homeless guys were given $50,
facts, because I'm one of them.
Oh, so we can't consider whether that might
be literally Luke's TikTok. Right? Or a Republican
who wants to say it or, you know,
any number of things or a homeless guy
that got paid to hold the sign. And
if it was the case, why would that
then mean that every other person would because
these are not real people or serious people,
I mean. They're not people you should take
seriously if they're willing to jump over a
thousand unknown possibilities
to what they want to think.
These are people you should make fun of.
Even if it turns out to be the
case, because she didn't know that. Remember, this
is one of those people that were holding
the most transparent in history, redacted binders. And
now she suddenly doesn't care about the Epstein
files that she told you were the most
important thing in the world because Trump said.
Hashtag journalism. Right?
So Kerry Wedler says, I'd feel a lot
more solidarity with the No Kings protesters if
they weren't salivating to pick a new master
for me and everyone else during the coming
election season. Exactly.
After which, they they will retreat back into
ignorance and apathy while their team rules with
impunity and author authoritarianism,
and it all starts over again.
Right? We're just like they're right now,
the Republicans are hiding from the team sport,
like, always clear.
I make sure I am because I'm talking
about every Republican. I don't think that today.
I don't think it's the majority. But the
team sport Republicans
are hiding behind mommy skirts right now. We
don't want to we don't admit, you know,
Glenn Beck and Alex Jones, we're, Oh, he's
just trying to secretly work within. Trust the
plan to fight to the end because Israel's
bad. You know, you know, the very thing
you said wasn't gonna happen. They're all just
so ridiculous right now. They're drowning in their
BS.
The point is, just like this in reverse,
you'll vent you'd get the same team players
on the other side that would do the
same thing and then hide from it when
it came to pass because that's what keeps
happening. And I don't think it's the majority,
but she's right. Because many of the people
out there who are protesting are not saying
we want no bad we want this person
instead.
And I don't agree with
that. Consistency and logic and principles, guys. And
we will be here the next time it
comes around too. Hopefully, you'll be doing this
and seeing this long enough to recognize that
Carrie and myself and Derek and Whitney have
been consistent in this exact feeling since we
started.
Doesn't matter what side you're on or what
presence of power. We criticize the power structure
based on what we feel is right, based
on constitutional rights, based on, you know,
free movement, human,
rather, you know, human principles. Like the idea
of not government state this perspective, but the
idea that we have the right to freely
move, to freely exchange with one another, and
act beyond all of this. But the point,
it's not about a side.
We really need to make sure we see
that today.
Now on that partisan point here,
I just that it just baffles me how
this can keep happening. And, I mean, not
necessarily anymore that I think people still fall
for it, because like I keep saying, I
think this is becoming more and more obvious.
I'm baffled that they keep trying this.
Now look. Maybe this is the time it
actually happens.
I I hope so because I think Obama's
a criminal.
But yet again,
we just made a joke about this. This
is real Robert saying, here it is, a
decade in the making. The United States press
secretary Levitt says, quote, now nearly ten years
later, thanks to declassification
of documents and Tulsi Gabbard,
Barack Obama is a criminal and will go
after Bob Blubick. That's what's happening.
He committed treason.
That's what they're telling you. That Obama
is a criminal,
and he tried to overthrow the government.
Okay. Great.
Put him in jail.
Same old story. Right? I also think he's
a criminal, just like all the rest of
them, maybe for different reasons than he's saying
or she's saying. I think they're criminals and
should be arrested.
Now watch as nothing happens.
I don't understand how many times this can
happen where they can get up and go,
oh, the thing. And, oh, Bob, is it
Pelosi? He's going down over and over and
over and over before and nothing happens before
people like this, real Robert and the rest,
start
calling
that out. How many times? I guess at
least one more.
Now, like like I said, maybe this will
change. In fact, pardon me, I didn't even
look because it's I bet you this is
an old clip. I'm willing to bet you
this is like the other one I just
showed you, which is from 2025. But even
if it's not, it's almost worse because she
stood up and she made the case yet
again, probably because they're drowning in their lies.
If Obama had been found this is evidence
that Paul C. Gabbard put forward last year.
Are you gonna tell me they wouldn't have
arrested him if it's the same information you're
putting forward again? Why would they have waited?
What's the point? I mean, if they wanted
a distraction, good god, arrest Obama? That would
change the entire conversation.
Watch
as nothing happens.
And I hope it does. So if it
does, don't be coming. I told you. I'm
I'm I hope it does. I'll high five
you as well. I just don't believe it.
And this is just somebody, Healthish Haven, basically,
just in case you wanna read it, said,
here's a breakdown of the of why they're
lying.
Yeah. It's just their opinion about what what
she said and why it's wrong. You can
watch for yourself.
Former congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene says Thomas Massie
is right. He completely ratioed the White House,
which is just them, I guess, thinking they're
funny and making fun of I I don't
even know what they're trying to do here.
Curious how American farmers are benefiting right now.
They don't. They're not. Or exactly how much
each state saved
Oldie
Farms, delivering for farmer. Like, they're making fun
of OnlyFans or rather making fun of farmers
and comparing it to a porn site.
I mean, like, what happens if you click
on that? I don't know. I'm not there
have been some weird stuff coming from them.
Right now, my advice to you would be
not to engage
or click on anything they're doing. They're weird
little glitchy videos with sound in the background.
They're who god only knows what they're trying
to do.
But Massey says, can you arrest Epstein's co
conspirators and co co conspirators instead of riffing
on a porn site?
Yeah. Exactly. And look,
this is the White House, guys. The White
House. This is just 4,000,000 followers. Donald Trump's
influence.
And he gets wildly ratioed.
Now, I mean, what's interesting, look at the
views. That's 1.7.
This is four
or 11,000,000
views. Look at that.
So with with a fraction of the views,
he gets a tremendous
more engagement
with ship with, you know and knowing it's
altered and manipulated on this platform, if you're
taking a face value, it simply means that
even their supporters agree with Massey more than
him. But, you know, you can't really discern
that today because of how broken this platform
is,
but interesting. And she says, Thomas Massie is
right, which is why his comment ratioed the
White House gross post comparing farmers to porn
stars. This administration was elected by conservatives who
are opposed to porn, rapists, pedophiles, yet protect
Epstein class, pedos and rapists.
You know, I find it hard to believe
that you could just broadly say that everyone
in Republicans are against porn, rapists, and pedophiles.
Clearly not, by the way. But, you know,
I agree with the general sentiment.
Here's another quick point on partisanship that I
just think is just it just speaks to
the dishonesty of all this. You tell me
what you think. Here's what here's what RFK
Jr. Just said.
He he has
a encyclopedic.
He's talking about Trump.
He he has,
encyclopedic
molecular
knowledge on these these wide range of very,
very eclectic
interest,
Music, Broadway
shows, pro wrestling,
football, every sport,
golf,
and and and, you know, and business and
Wall Street. He knows how everybody made their
money and what deals they made,
and he tells stories all the time about
it. It's just one after the other.
And one time I was
during the campaign, I was on the airplane
with him, and we were sitting across the
table from each other eating McDonald's,
drinking Diet Coke.
And,
Yeah.
Always.
He we started talking about Syria,
and he got a,
a placemat,
and he turned it on its back. And
then he took a sharpie, and he drew
a perfect map of the Mideast. And then
he put the troop strength of every
country on every border
on that map. And it just, it
challenged a lot of the assumptions
that I had been told about him. He
has,
you know, he has this extraordinary depth of
knowledge about what's happening in each one of
the agencies,
my agency and the others. And,
you know, and then he has an instinct
for making good choices.
Yes. Well, I
Okay.
Well,
you can clearly I mean, you know, the
instinct for making good choices, well, that speaks
for itself. I guess that depends on what
you think he's driving his choices. You know,
it's funny how a man can sit there
who is now supporting
many things that he aggressively fought against and
tell me he's making good choices kinda feels
hard to swallow.
But simple point. And this is a small
thing. Like, this is not this is just
about, you know, about the kind of things
they're willing to lie about.
I simply said, you can call this Trump
brain syndrome despite my criticism of both sides
of this broken government.
I simply do not believe this based on
countless examples of ignorance and countless examples of
dishonesty.
First of all, I just do not believe,
period, that he could just flip over a
map and draw the Middle East. I mean,
guys, I I I know people that do
this every day who can't do that. Trump
has demonstrated countless times. He I just it's
my opinion entirely. It's not even worth it's
more for me getting into the idea of
whether or not, in a general sense, that
you think they would float something like that,
hypothetically speaking, if it wasn't true and why
you think they would do that. It's kind
of a thought experiment. You know, the idea
being we're, you know, we're clearly at this
interesting point where I think they're more exposed
than ever. I think they're that people they're
losing support more than ever. And so I
think we're in this, like,
cartoonish propaganda phase where it's just the idea
is just to kind of just put out
everything they can. I mean, look at what
Tulsi Gabbard has said. Look what he has
said.
Things that you know, at least if at
least their entire career before Trump, they aggressively
disagreed with and suddenly now they support it.
I just we must know by now that
these people are being dishonest in plenty of
ways whether this is one of them or
not. I personally, I I just don't believe
that. I think there's
evidence that this person is not even remotely
there. Now, Trump is savvy in plenty of
ways. Okay. Maybe maybe you could argue he
know the troop locations are, like, maybe, like,
numbers or maybe. I can see that. But
him being able to draw out that map,
I I just don't believe it. He can
barely recall these names half the time. I
just think that's crazy. And it speaks to
what they're willing to lie about.
Now one little quick thing on on the
interesting point of this at the end, I
happen to see this. I won't even get
into why. It was kinda funny that this
got shot. You know? Anyway, it doesn't matter
because it was basically something I was asking
Grokken and randomly asked. It was one of
those chats I was showing you. And I
asked you something without I forgot to put
the link in,
and it responded with this.
And it was I was just like, show
me the contradiction. And, you know, with something,
and it responded with this saying, well, here,
TLav is not as super biased. I was
like, okay.
That's interesting. Well, why would that be where
you know, it it's just weird. There's so
this this platform is being aggressively
gamed, guys.
I just thought that means that this that
was literally thinking about how biased I it
thinks I am while it was I didn't
even ask. I just think it was hilarious.
But here's what I thought was interesting. For
for an inside joke for us with especially
with what we were just covering. Right?
I remember what looking at the same ridiculous
media bias fact check platform where it had
me somewhere, like, right here a long time
ago. Not that I care. But what's funny
is you know what we've done. You know
how long, you know, the the effort that
we take to source things to make it
factually provable and then opinions.
And yet it show literally, in regard to
the the bias being stream.
Right? And guess what side that says?
For the right. You gotta love that. Right?
So right now, apparently, I'm extremely
biased toward the right.
You wanna you wanna you wanna jive that
with the real world for me? And it
said, guess what? The reasoning for this discussion,
because apparently, I only talk about propaganda,
conspiracy,
pseudoscience,
like, directly from the peer reviewed science, apparently.
Poor sourcing.
You gotta love that one. Lack of transparency.
I mean, guys, this is not even connected
to what I'm doing. This is just a,
you know I mean, jet I'm sure there
are people out there who don't who, you
know, hate me for one reason or another
who would try to disagree with that. But
you can't be honest and tell me that
I poor sourcing? You mean as aside from
sourcing literally everything that I point to? Look,
you could argue that it's too much maybe.
Like, that's not what poor sourcing means. Lack
of transparency.
Guys, I've got as transparent as you can
get on this platform, but you all know
this though. That's what's funny to me. And
failed fact checks because what they say that
I you know, I just think it's hilarious.
The main point for me though is that
that I'm apparently this should speak enough.
Right now, I'm being called a lefty by
the right, just like I was called a
righty during COVID by the left. You know?
But yet you're consistent calling out both sides.
Just right. I just thought that was hilarious.
But anyway,
moving on to the main point of today.
First, from a technocratic perspective, I just wanna
point this out. This person, I I I
poke smot on on the, on, YouTube channel,
said that the video they were trying to
access and and mine, I guess, in general,
is being geo blocked, which is seemingly becoming
more and more prevalent today. They had to
set up their VPN, and suddenly it worked.
And this is on YouTube with a random
video. Why wouldn't they just censor me? You
know? I think we're getting into a different
phase of this. That's what I've been talking
about for a while. This has changed. But
very interesting because it's it is definitely happening.
And whether this is the case or not
here, it is happening in a general sense,
and I think we all see that. Now,
I wanted to put this in your mind
again.
Just I mean, whether the this is somewhat
connected, but just I saw this and went,
oh my god. Think about this with where
we currently are. This was in January 06/19/2025.
This this was when the US government initiated
detachment two zero one. Actually, let me see
if I can get that to come up.
I believe I can.
I'll just search for it. I'm sure it'll
come up. Here we go. Army launches detachment
two zero one, executive innovation core to drive
tech transformation.
Now remember what,
Pegset just did.
He just removed
the regalia from,
I think it was
chaplains. Right? From from in which I thought
was, interesting at the time. I don't see
a lot of that make sense. They're they're
military like anybody else is. Right? What's weird
to me, and this just brought this to
mind. Remember what this was. This and this
is an actual picture, guys. This is these
are this is Palantir,
Meta, and I believe it was OpenAI, if
I remember correctly.
And they got sworn to the military. Now
what Brad Miller told me,
these people were given,
with colonel status, I believe. And these these
are people who were one step below the
highest level. They didn't go through any training.
They didn't go through any military. These these
were these were the CTOs of of Meta
and Palantir
who were given that level of authority in
the military.
Yeah. And what he said is, realize you've
got people in the military that are medical,
for example, or other other elements that are
not, you know, they're military, but they don't
actually wear the garb. They don't actually get
the regalia. They're it's in a separate it's
a civilian role in the military. So ask
yourself, why did they not give these people
civilian roles? Why did they give Palantir and
Meta and other AI companies? Why did they
give them high level,
super influential military positions? And as Brad told
me, these words they they that means they
can quite literally command anybody underneath them, whether
or not whether or not they're in their
tech side of this or, you know, they're
actual leaders in the military now. I don't
know. This this should have been a wildly
influential story. It got little coverage. As I
called it, technocracy
in uniform. That's literally what this was. Now,
think about at the time, you you know,
people kinda brushed it off.
Look at where we are. You know, as
Jones will tell you, this little Democrat thing,
they they hate Democrats hate Palantir. It's a
small thing. Yeah. That's a lie. It was
a lie then. It's even more obviously of
a lie now.
It's gigantic. It's it's over UK elements, military.
They just adopted volunteers AI for the core
military use in this country.
For and we're gonna get into the overlap
of the spyware from the from the ICE
elements and everything else. But just think about
how alarming that is, that these people are
at the highest levels. I mean, this is
a coup in sorts. And I don't know
why we can't acknowledge that, guys. I mean,
I think I know why it's not being
allowed to be acknowledged.
It's taking place right now. But keep this
in mind, it'll only become more relevant as
more and more of these kind of things
become positions of influential power.
I'll start.
Oh, yeah. This is well.
Realize that Palantir has a strategic partnership with
Israel, which is just important to include. You'll
see
why.
Now
the the phone elements of this, I thought,
were very interesting. Remember remember what we were
getting these kind of floated out? And this
is, I think, very relevant to where this
is.
Blackwater,
Eric Prince, and here's a new freedom phone
or what did he call it? Unplugged phone.
The article here says Blackwater's founder would like
you to sell you a privacy phone made
in The US. The updated UpPhone,
which was unplugged phone, will eventually be made
in The US, but it isn't
yet. Oh, that's interesting. I wonder why phones
are currently made in Indonesia?
Okay. So we get, like, I lied to.
Right? That that was the earliest part of
this, and it was very clearly shown to
have some alarming
surveillance elements. And this was the lie was
this is sort of like the the phone
marketed to MAGA. Right?
And myself and plenty of others were like,
okay. Well, there's very, very
unnerving connections to multiple things.
Erik Prince wants to sell you a secure
smartphone that's too good to be true.
Well, they tried to tell you it was
Indonesia. Right? Well, here was the reality when
you dig beyond the surface level. Corporate framing
Unplugged's day to day technology operations are run
by Eran Kaprin Karpin, a former employee of
Communitech,
the Israeli startup that gave rise to the
now infamous hacker group, the NSO Group.
Weird.
He's also a veteran of Israel's unit eighty
two hundred, an agency that conducts cyber espionage
and is the country's equivalent of the NSA.
So, yeah, maybe you ran Indonesia, but it's
an Israeli company that was literally
gave rise to the infamous NSO Group.
Pegasus software, par Paragon. So that's what we're
talking about. And so this is an important
thing to think about, that it goes back
to even the first phone that Erik Prince
was trying to huck at people, and this
was coming from Israel's in connect connection. That's
important.
Then
when that very clearly got pushed to the
side because that wasn't what people wanted to
hear,
MAGA phone. Right? We got Trump's new special
phone. But what happened to that? Oh, that's
right. It also fell down because they also
lied to you. Weird how we can't learn
our lessons here. MAGA's world freedom phone,
actually budget Chinese phone.
And I could get into it like I
did before. There's clear connections that you could
tie back to plenty of things, including Israel.
But the point for me is not necessarily
one or the other, but just that they're
lying to you. They're selling you something that
will sell you.
They will sell your data. They will spy
on you. It's been the same point every
single time I called it out then.
So keeping that in mind that they were
already trying to kind of huck these things
at you, and both of them had connections
to their alarming spyware elements
that went right back to the NSO group?
Well,
welcome to the White House app.
Launch the White House app. Live streams, real
time updates straight from the source, no filter,
except absolutely lots of filters.
Even Twitter called this out.
The promoted White House app tracks users' precise
location every four point five minutes
via third party one signal, syncing coordinates to
external servers despite
no filter claims.
They're lying, guys.
Or I guess the question is either they're
lying to you or the question is, did
somebody right. Did somebody lie to them? And
if somebody lied to them, that means that
somebody a lot of people, as one of
these articles point out, didn't do their due
diligence or didn't care. It's certainly possible that
Trump has no idea that this has been
manipulated and somebody else is spying on American
citizens.
Or it could just be that our trinational
security state is spying on us, and it's
Israel, The United States, The UK, everybody else,
or whatever you wanna look at it as.
The point is, this is spyware.
There's really no way around it. And if
we can't turn around and acknowledge this,
we're I mean, I I'm thinking about it.
If this goes forward and nothing if this
doesn't become a general conversation
on the highest levels of the media, then
we are completely overtaken.
Whatever you think that means, you can take
China if you want. I my point is
just that at some level, we have to
acknowledge that something like this not getting discussed
at the highest levels of left right media
outside of the independent,
there's there's no denying what that shows you
because this is incredibly
important.
So even the Libertarian Party of Tennessee called
this out, and they simply said, the new
White House app is literally spyware. So this
is not being missed on anybody, guys. This
has been broadly acknowledged. It's important to make
sure that we discuss.
This is just what you could look up
for yourself on, you know, on the app
permissions,
and it just goes over the stuff we're
gonna talk about in a second. Precise location,
modify, delete the contents of your shared storage.
Like, absorb that for a second.
Nobody does this, guys. This is this they're
they're giving themselves access to remove content from
your storage.
I'm sure you can piece together why that
would be needed or wanted. And I'm not
even making this about one group. Your government
has every needed reason to remove content they
don't want you seeing.
Run foreground service. This app can appear on
top of other apps. Run it startup. Goo
like, so it starts up when your phone
starts up. Right? Google App Play. Re I
mean, we'll go through this in more in-depth.
Biometric hardware.
This
person just made this, you know, your White
House app. All your photos, livestreams, events, share
with Israel. Now that's the joke, really, that
people are kinda because it's funny how obvious
that connection is, and so people are now
making a joke about it. But it's not
much of a joke because, really, there is
a connection. But it's not as it's not
as simple as saying this is Israel's connection.
Right? But here's my thing and or rather
Israel's app,
which I'm not saying. I don't I I
mean, I'm I'm gonna show you where I
think all of this overlaps. So hypothetically speaking,
whoever made this app, that the governments have
access to what it shows there, so Israel
does too.
I'm I'm gonna show you what this means.
But you could very well argue that the
actual entire thing is run by kind of
the cult the coordination of all of them.
But realize how alarming this truly is and
what this means that they're willing to put
this out
and not care like, and lie to you
about it and then just not care that
you see it. Now the I'm gonna include
a couple of really good, articles here that
I think are tech some of them are
little little tech focused.
Which is,
you know, like, it it gets super tech
heavy and it's some of it's gonna be
more you know, a lot of it's even
above my head, but this is or just
not even. I I'm not that I'm not
not that word spelled worst well versed on
it. Security analysts
analysis, excuse me, of the official White House
iOS app. This was from March 27.
Now this is you read through this. It's
just good because it gives you a lot
of the technical information. Like, if you're if
you're more on that side of things, this
will give you more of the out like,
the written out code and and dynamics of
how this is actually working. I'll include all
these so you can go through it. I'm
gonna go to just the main two, the
one this one listed off, and this one
will go through it in a much more
easily digestible point.
But
same kind of thing. This one is set
a lot more, in-depth. And this is I
decompiled the White House's new app.
Here's just some of the overview points they
make.
One, injects JavaScript into every website you open.
Though it's in app browser or through it's
in app browser to hide cookie consent
dialogues.
Like, that's a just such a decision, guys.
J JDPR
banners, login walls,
sign up walls, upsell prompts, and paywalls
has a full GPS tracking pipeline. Why would
they even need that?
Compiled in
that
polls every four point five minutes in the
foreground and nine point five minutes in the
background,
syncing latitude, longitude, accuracy, timestamp
to one signal servers. And that there's a
reason that's super alarming as well, seeing as
how those servers can ultimately open a
it it opens you to vulnerability.
Loads JavaScript from the random person's GitHub page
sites.
For YouTube embeds, if that account is compromised,
arbitrary code runs in the app's web view.
Load third party JavaScript from Elfsight
for social media widgets with no sandboxing.
Sends email addresses to Mailchimp. Images are served
from
upload care, and a true social embed
is hardcored with static CDN URLs. None of
this is governed government infrastructure.
So that's that alone. And some of this
even right here might be above someone's head.
We'll get into the easy understanding part next.
The idea
that it's not running government infrastructure, guys, this
is exactly what I'm talking about. This is
getting way outside. Like, if you could talk
about this in the overlap of, like, the
the network state direction, you could talk about
this in some sort of a coup foreign
power thing, or you could just realize that
we're talking about some kind of public private
partnership blending where this becomes something that, one,
put makes you less secure, but two, also
allows you where you have no access to
any of you. You can see what they
have. This is
this is bad. Everyone
there's plenty of experts that are in the
field of this very, you know, of of
this exact field and are saying I mean,
I'll be jumping ahead a bit or read
or telling you this is like no one
does this. People do parts of this in
certain you know, and and then and get
called out for it. For them to come
out and basically just dump this whole thing,
this is like you this is a spyware
app. It's what it is, and they just
didn't think you'd see it or didn't
care. Has no certificate pinning, standard Android trust
management, ships with dev artifacts in production, a
local host URL,
the expo dev client, and an ex exported
compost preview activity, profile users extensively through OneSignal.
So here is
breakdown of this. The White House app is
spyware with a gov badge.
So it says every cybersecurity class I've ever
sat through hammered the same thing into our
heads. Ethics.
Now whether that's what the industry demonstrates, I
do agree this is something that we, you
know, they love to even in the industry,
right? They they all, like, government comes out.
We'll never take your data, and they always
do, like clockwork. We won't sell it, and
then they get to sell it, like with
COVID information. They all did it, guys.
But they speak they claim ethics, right? Difference
with this administration, they just don't care anymore.
No ethics pledges. Don't forget that. That matters.
There was a point at which it was
monumentally important as no one seemed to care.
Now, that had to do with the Israel
influence.
I might as well grab it since we're
bringing it up.
All this matters. I mean, I was actually
blown away why this didn't become a bigger
topic.
Trump admin's missing ethics pledges. As somebody involved
with it literally said, that means foreign element
foreign governments could literally influence this and we
wouldn't know. I said, well, that's exactly the
point, isn't it? And weird how nobody seemed
to care
outside of you guys.
Responsible disclosure.
Ethics.
Don't touch what you don't have permission to
touch.
Don't intercept traffic. Don't inject code into systems
you don't own. Don't collect data without consent.
Now what's the difference with Trump and that
they they believe, as they clearly tell me,
they could do whatever they want. Right? You
can just you know, you know, the hubris
is clear, but the idea
like, what was the example? Oh, like, Ecuador,
for example. Or, you know, you know, they
just went and used their location anyway even
though they said no. And they Trump just
clearly thinks he can do whatever he wants.
It's very clear he's made a statement.
Through this case,
collecting data or dumping code to the system,
they did it, and they are doing it.
I guarantee there's gonna be platforms out there
that have a real problem with this and
probably blacklist the app. But I doubt that
stops it from being on the App Store.
And then the White House ships an app
that does all of that.
Right? So he's saying, like, every every class
I ever took stressed that these things can
never happen. And then the White House releases
an app that does every one of them.
The Trump White House launched an official mobile
app on March 28. They called it unparalleled
access to the Trump administration.
A security researcher who goes by Ther,
Theralo
pulled the APK,
threw it into j, JADX,
and decompiled the entire thing. Both those first
two were showing you most of that.
What they found would get any cybersecurity student
expelled,
any,
pen tester fired, and any company sued.
But it's stamped with .gov badge, so, apparently,
it's fine.
This is not a political article. This is
a technical audit of a government application that
violates every principle the cybersecurity industry teaches,
every standard the federal government is supposed to
uphold,
every ethical boundary we are told never to
cross. I'm calling out everyone responsible.
You'll see. You can I hope you can
see why this has parallels to at well
beyond this one talking point,
that they would just do
this? Right? The idea that they they could
not just one, but, like, literally just choose
to break every possible. And it's not even
rules. It's about the idea that you're invasively
manipulating these people. Half these people that jumped
right into that didn't even check because they
think they can trust you, and you're now
spying on them. You're absorbing their information, and
so too are every other group they're working
with, whether the companies or foreign governments involved
with them too.
Who built this?
And it goes on to point out the
well, first of all, it says the app
was built by an entity called forty four
Press or forty five Press according to Expo
configuration.
Now what's interesting to me on top of
that is apparently this is a group that
didn't exist before this. Rings very similar to
Noam's company that they just funded for something
that, you know, where there's no building, there's
no place. Same kind of idea we'll get
to in a second,
which I think speaks volumes.
Finding one GPS tracking pipeline. Your location every
four point five minutes.
Speaks for itself, guys. Why in the world
they would need that to give updates about
what's going on in the White House? You
did they don't, guys. This is surveillance tracking,
data mining. Right? Trump learned that from,
Cambridge Analytica and the reality of what he
gained from
using that on social media to manipulate the
audiences. That's what our government does. Every four
point five minutes, they're watching you. And the
point is it goes on. And, you know,
of course, uses Google's location API because Google's
the good guy. Right, Republicans? Isn't Google totally
not the globalist deep state point that we
were making before Trump was in power? Maybe
I'm getting confused. Maybe I mix those up.
You know, Google and BlackRock and and Gates.
Right? They're the good guys now, or am
I am I missing the boat here?
And, you know, plenty of other you they're
they're spying on you guys, and they're tracking
your location. Can you imagine if that was
a Biden app?
A White House app when Biden was in
power. It would be a biggest deal in
the century to certain one-sided players.
It does matter, and it is a big
deal no matter who does
it. Number two, JavaScript injection into every website
you visit.
Now I'm not even sure if I grasped
what the the bigger point of what that
may mean. Every time you open a link
inside of an app,
every time it opens in a built in
web viewer browser
before you you know, look. You have to
understand, guys. This is everything.
So you download this app,
every time you in a in a you
every time you open a link inside this
app inside the White House app, it opens
in a built in WebView browser. Now what
I'm gonna get into, I've jumped slightly ahead
there, is that what this this is about
your phone as well and what's going on
in your phone. This part specifically is within
that. My point, though, is it still. So
you're in this app. You hit a link.
It then opens a built in WebView browser
outside of the app. Okay? Or in it,
but in it's in it's in now the
extension beyond it. You're now cert you're online.
Right? Before you see anything, the app injects
a JavaScript
payload
into the page. Now, again, that's what I
was saying earlier. We're talking about a page
that's not owned by this app. This is
you're you're injecting code into whatever you then
view through that browser.
It hides
anywhere you then go from that, guys. It
hides cookie consent banners,
GDPR
consent dialogues, OneTrust pop ups,
privacy banners,
login walls, sign up walls, upsell prompts, paywall
elements,
consent management platforms.
Then it deploys
a a mutation
observer,
a persistent
DOM watcher that continuously
monitors the page
and rehides
any consent elements that get dynamically added after
initial load.
The injector doesn't just fire once. It fights
back against the sites that try to redisplay
their consent dialogues.
So now, hypothetically, if this browser wants to
bump you into some other thing, you know,
or promotes another website that, I don't know,
is completely designed to steal everything from your
phone, well, you wouldn't even notice that it
was saying consent here. It would jump right
past that. That seems very organized to me.
And I'm sure you could think of other
ways that could be abused or ways that
are probably just alarming whether or not it's
abused.
This runs on every single page load in
the web view,
every link you tap.
Now I wanted to bet you that people
will probably start and do this is almost
designed to get you to start using this
in general.
Let me be explicit about what this means,
the person writes. A United States government application
is injecting code into third party websites
to, one, strip your right to consent to
tracking.
Very clear.
That's very manipulative. And you're talking about people
who are, you know, the Bitcoin community who
are very they it matters to them, and
it should, about anonymity,
about consent to tracking what you're doing, and
they're literally tricking you into hiding that, into
consenting without knowing it.
Two, to bypass authentication barriers,
login walls,
which I'm I mean, the way I'm reading
this is this can work in other ways,
I would argue, through you. And it says
circumvent paid content gates, paywall bypass potential CFAA
and DMCA
implications,
enable silent third party tracking.
Every tracker on every site fires without restriction
because the consent gate was removed.
See the point? So things that would otherwise
say consent here to track on your phone
wouldn't show, and it would just instantly start
happening. Because I mean, that's that's just vil
that's that's vicious.
That's in that's
deliberately
manipulative
for their benefit at your expense.
If you can't come to terms with this,
you don't care what's going on. These people
are using you,
or somebody's using you through them.
I mean, ask yourself why they would need
to silently turn off your own consent. Think
about that in any other context.
You know, wear a mask. You don't get
to time in. You do it anyway. Take
this thing. No consent allowed. We we you
know, it's obviously a different circumstance, but it's
the point about consent. It's your choice to
consent or not. They don't get to bypass
that because you signed on to something they
did without telling you. It's the same point.
This is not a library default, he writes.
This is not a leftover.
Someone
hand wrote
a 12 pattern CSS injector with a mutation
observer. Meaning, in case you missed that, this
was very deliberately
hands
written into the code to ensure the things
they just listed off. That's why it's very
I mean, whether it was deliberate, it's spyware.
But the point is that they literally made
sure they wrote in the spyware elements so
they could spy on
you. The irony, the app that profiles one
through,
profiles you through one signal
is also stripping consent dialogues that would let
you opt out of tracking on other sites.
That's why I wanted to focus on this.
This is insane.
Loading code from random person's GitHub pages.
That's a personal GitHub page site. I'm curious
whose, by the way, belonging to an individual
developer.
If that GitHub account gets compromised,
which is certainly possible,
whoever controls it can serve arbitrary
HTML and JavaScript
to every single user of the White House
app, which I'm sure is already millions,
crazily enough,
executing inside,
yes, you guessed it, the WebView context.
So they could all if the just it
just creates a very ridiculous security potential,
you know, like a vulnerability.
But it says, but a goa.gov
application should have caught this in the security
review. The fact that they didn't catch it
tells you there wasn't one, or they don't
care, I would add.
Number four, more third party code execution.
The app also loads JavaScript from Elfsight. Now,
I also wanna go back. I mean, who
knows if it ends up happening because, you
know, new things happen every day. But I
did make a note. I wanna go back
and go through these individual companies and their
own different things. I did briefly look at
each one. But, you know, sometimes you can
look at these things for hours and and
only, you know, eventually stumble across something because
of how manipulative things are today.
A commercial
SAS widget company, Elfsight,
and it says this code runs inside the
web view with no sandboxing.
Whatever tracking Elfsight does, it does inside this
government app.
Their code can change at any time
without the app being updated.
I mean, that alone should be enough for
you to stop using this. That means they
could literally do whatever they want. They could
add anything tomorrow, and you wouldn't even know
and you've already at least consented. I mean,
who knows if there's even a consent when
you open this thing, or at least no
longer going forward. But what it means is
whether you consent it or not, once you
begin to use this tomorrow, they could suddenly
say, we're gonna steal your banking information. We
could it's you may think that's not possible,
but they could do well, let me go
ahead and say that whether that might not
be possible technologically because I'm not gonna say
I'm the expert on this. But, nonetheless,
they could change their code at any time
without you being noticed of that or you
noticing that. So you could whatever the experts
would tell you, change your code to do
this malicious thing, and you wouldn't know. I
would argue that could effectively be something that
could siphon information from your phone. Why couldn't
I be making information? But I'm not the
expert. At the end of the day,
how is that something anybody would be okay
with, guys? Would you be okay if that
was Biden
or anybody other than it's just wild.
Your data goes
everywhere, it says,
except the government.
This is finding number five.
Here's where your data actually goes
when you use this official
US government app.
One signal,
Mailchimp,
up upload care, elf site, truth social,
Facebook, lonely not not none of these are
government controlled infrastructure.
Not one.
So now you're vulnerable because of these. But
the many the most of these companies are,
you know, big companies.
But it's just this this is wild to
me
how this is sort of being pushed off.
And I bear I'm willing to bet you
it overlaps with these in their own way
too. I mean,
Facebook.
Does that not matter? I mean, Meta is
part of this whole thing, and he Meta
was one of the people that censored you
for talking about COVID shots.
Does it not matter that Facebook is now
part of this? It should.
You guys are the ones telling us, and
I agree, that that he should be somebody
going to jail. Now he's Trump's right hand
man when it comes to techno technology, apparently.
He's in the he's in the new science
advisory group, guys.
Number six, OneSignal user profiling
way beyond push notifications.
OneSignal isn't just sending push notifications.
The full profiling toolkit is con is compiled
in
everything, really. I mean, it's just
the ones that'll stand out. Notification life cycle
tracking. Every notification received, opened, or dismissed is
logged.
Every single one.
Track user actions and conversations.
Cross device user identification.
Associate
phone numbers with user profiles.
Permission changes, subscription changes, user state changes, all
of this.
You know? I just
honestly, I run over this earlier. I'm just
like, I can't believe this is so clear.
No certificate pending. Now this one's wild to
me coming from somebody running the website running
a website, understanding how important this is. The
app uses standard Android trust manager for SSL
with no custom certificate.
If you're an oh, if you're on a
corporate network, public Wi Fi, or any network
with a compromised CA,
all traffic between the app and its back
ends can be intercepted and read.
For a government app that handles citizen data,
no pinning.
Meaning, it's just it I honestly think this
is set up in order to be
taken.
Like, you ope you keep an opening for
that to be the reality.
It's important.
Now I I, very well,
I'm sure this person isn't referring to me,
but it's worth pointing out, like, somebody mentions
the word paranoid in the chat.
You certainly I mean, you could argue this
is unnecessarily concerned, but realize
most everything that worries me are things that
are not hypothetical, are things that are literally
doing, things that you can quite literally see,
that in and of themselves
are enough. I mean, are frankly criminal, guys.
If it was done by anybody under the
government, it would be criminal. It should be
anyway.
Now I I yeah. I'll put I think
they're probably talking to someone else in the
chat, but it's worth considering that somebody rightly
would look at all this and go, oh,
you guys are conspiracy theorists. Oh, you're crazy.
Remember, this is not even like a political
this is a technical overview of what they're
doing.
Number eight, development artifacts in production.
Number nine,
entire external storage exposed.
It says the file provider configuration exposes the
entire external storage route.
The WebView,
the same WebView running the con the consent
bypass injector and loading unvetted third party JavaScript
from random GitHub accounts has access to your
entire
external storage through this file provider. Now, this
is so much more to me, guys.
If they have access to your storage, your
external storage, meaning not in the app,
they have access to everything as far as
I'm concerned.
Everything on your phone, which then I argue
sec sort of,
sec, retroactively
means that the earlier things we discussed would
be able to somewhat access anything and siphon
anything.
But it says, who failed here? I
mean, just before we get past that
and we we briefly read this on another
one as well. But the idea of being
able to remove, delete, add like, okay. Now
what if we're talking about being able to
have things added to your external storage on
your phone, your computer? Then suddenly, you're raided
and you have child pornography. You know, things
whatever. We talk about this often, about people
being set up in this way. This is
why it's important to be as
secure as you can, but realize that this
is the world we're we're wading into, guys.
And if we know what Israel's been capable
of or what the US government or the
UK have been how they have done before,
we should worry if this is being set
up. That's where you should run screening. Don't
even get close to this app.
Who failed here?
He says, let me name names.
Forty five
Press,
the developer entity that built the app. You
shipped a government application
with GPS tracking, code injection,
no certificate pinning, dev artifacts in production, and
third party code loaded from a personal GitHub.
This is amateur hour, they wrote.
The a first year computer science student would
know better.
CISA, cybersecurity
infrastructure security agency, CISA, of all groups, You
are the federal agency responsible for cybersecurity.
You manage the .gov domain.
The DMARC
records on aliens.gov route to dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov.
You're actively managing federal domain security, but you
let this slip
or you let this app ship. Excuse me.
It says, where was the security review? Where
was the code audit? Where was the FedRAMP
authorization?
An An official government app is injecting JavaScript
into third party websites, loading code from random
GitHub accounts, and routing citizen data through five
private companies.
And CISA had nothing to say about it?
I don't buy it, guys. I don't buy
it. CISA,
what you know, we've talked about this in
the manipulative elements of the whole way it's
used, but the point is it would if
this was genuine, it was about protecting our
our cybersecurity.
This is like the, like, the, I guess,
the gold standard of the bad things you
should do. Like, if there was something that
CSO would ever stop, it would be exactly
what we just talked about. If they cared
about this and if it was about something,
you know, not if it was a let's
put it this way, not a government plan
or a government agenda.
That's how I see this. I don't understand.
I mean, I mean, I don't even know
why I should even need to qualify that.
They they put the app out. How else
would you read this?
The White House digital team. You commissioned this
app and called it unparalleled access to Trump
administration. What you delivered is unparalleled access to
your user's location, browsers behave browsing behavior, notification
interactions, the device identifiers, all flowing to private
companies, meaning the other companies have access to
this stuff too.
You knew about the location issue. You wrote
a plug in called no location. Didn't work.
Did anyone check?
One signal. Your SDK ships with a full
location tracking module that survives expo plug ins
designed to strip it. When government apps include
your SDK for push notifications, they get GPS
tracking as a bonus.
Your documentation should make this crystal clear, but
they either didn't know it was there or
they lied to you. Probably a little bit
of both. The combined picture, an app that
tracks your GPS every 4.5,
that strips your ability to consent to tracking
on other websites,
that loads and executes code from embedded third
party sources, that routes all of your data
through private companies, that exposes your entire storage
on your phone and other external devices depending
on what you're on
to WebView.
Your entire storage
that has no certificate pinning as as SSL,
that ships with dev artifacts still in the
binary.
That's not a news app. That's a spyware
wearing a dot gov badge.
Whether this is intentional surveillance or catastrophic negligence,
the outcome for users is the same. The
code is in the binary.
The pipeline's built. The data flows to private
servers.
You see what that is, guys? The White
House has not publicly responded to these technical
findings. This came out two days ago. Are
you serious?
I mean, just that last part of this,
with everything you just said, that ultimately, this
is a pipeline. The the and the data
is flowing to a five serve private servers
we can't verify.
On top of all of that, just to
put the, like, the absurdity
on top of everything,
Huawei tracking infrastructure. Now I have to say,
my gut, which could just be, you know,
my opinion,
is that this was almost done in order
to, like, a red like a red herring.
Like, in order to get you to look
away from what all of this points to.
It says independent analysis by Sam Bent dot
com confirmed the app
ships with three embedded trackers,
including
Huawei Mobile Services Core?
And it says, yes. The same Chinese company
that the US government sanctioned and banned from
federal networks
is shipping tracking infrastructure
inside the sitting president's official app.
You can't make this up.
I just that's insane.
And so what's even weirder, unless I've missed
it, is why haven't their Democrats called this
out?
Telling you guys.
I mean, maybe they will.
Because honestly, I think that's the plan. I
think that's meant to sort of be the
red herring to the bigger picture here. But
what are we doing? How in the world
can this not be the biggest story right
now?
At least in this country, right, with what's
happening.
And, of course, here's Lib's TikTok.
Apple is hiding the new apps White House
App Store. Look how long you have to
scroll to find it when searching for it.
Look at this. Audience is four, which new
apps at the Apple Store could take up
to seventy two hours to correctly appear. Well,
guess what? Right when they posted this, I
looked and it was literally number one.
Literally the number one app. I you know,
my opinion, because I think we all know
what these ridiculous partisan platforms do. They're trying
to go, oh, yeah, I'm gonna look, and
then probably they they they're driving you to
go look at the app because that's what
these absurd platforms do.
Because she just scrolls way down and shows
down. I I don't believe it. But either
way, it says up there that it's, you
know, take should take a second, but they
want people to go look at it. Now
don't you think these platforms
would be the first to scream or these
accounts
if this was in any way Democrat associated?
They wouldn't even need evidence, guys. They would
need Trump insinuating, and they would all scream
it as fact for the next year. That's
who these people are. Just the same on
the other side of the paradigm.
So in before we get into some other
points about this connection, like, in and what
I wanna make sure is clear, even though
I know I'm gonna make a connection, that
these are two separate stories. Okay? That's that
that concludes the first part of that conversation,
the obvious and undeniable
concern of what we just highlighted.
Now, let's talk about the bigger picture of
spyware
and and Israel's overlap with that as it
pertains to the US government and specifically Trump.
Now going back to 2017, I wanna show
you the long term discussion we've been having
specifically about,
in this case, NSO Group, but largely just
Israeli spyware.
This is, written by, it was,
Zero Edge back in 2017.
Meet the Israeli cyber weapons dealer paid millions
by governments to hack our phones. Just to
show you how this goes well before 2017,
by the way. The NSO Group, owned by
US based Francisco Partners.
That's what was being reported, of course, by
Zero Edge. Back in the time when this
is something you know, I I was posting
this before
this was just before we started doing mostly
our original content.
And so what's funny to me is back
then, it was we got them. So it's
a it's a US based company. No. It's
not. I mean, this is Israeli spyware. This
is the reality of it. It goes back
to the same kind of point. But either
way, the point is it's re the reality
is we've always known what this was. We've
always known that this is
vicious.
It's weaponized.
Now here
is one for 2018 for Whitney Webb.
Snowden is Israeli spyware used by governments to
pursue journalists targeted for assassination.
2018.
Same conversation.
This is this is NSO Group.
Pegasus
software. Go and read through these. The my
point today is not to go through each
of these articles, but just simply to show
you the 2018, the conversation of the enemy
very, very publicly acknowledging
what NSO Group in particular
represented.
Criminals.
Israeli government connected criminals.
They're spying
and and and killing innocent journalists,
activists.
Twenty twenty one, Robert Ilukesh for the last
American vagabond. Israel is aiding Saudi Arabia and
others to spy on human rights activists.
And it's all group.
This this is all leading somewhere.
2025, as I showed you, Israeli spyware firm
NSO Group found liable for hacks. So they
literally got found guilty or at least liable
for what they were doing through WhatsApp and
plenty of other apps, guys. Plenty of them.
We also let's not forget let's let's also
not forget in 2025,
Mike Walls, who is now an ambassador still
in the government,
was caught using
a tele it's called TeleMessage.
It is an app that is used by
Israeli intelligence to archive signal. He was literally
using the Israeli intelligence app on his phone
in the inner circle of the Trump White
House.
Of course, the media, because I'm telling you
there's more going on than just left first
right,
only called it a signal gate. They didn't
talk about the most why would that be
important?
It's important because
what was important was TeleMessage was an archive
app used by Israeli intelligence, and this was
clearly relaying information outside of the inner circle.
And that's and right after this, he got
pushed to the side.
It's called TeleMessage. It's connected to the same
conversation. It is an earlier these are the
same points. This is what you now have
in your phone, in my opinion, some level
of this invasive technology
that's all interconnected.
Next, we have this one from twenty twenty
five December. This is a larger conversation about
smartphones that were worldwide silently infected with Israeli
spyware.
Intel Intelexa.
All of this is interconnected to the same
elements, guys.
Anyway, so the point in all of this
is to show you that right up until
the end of, you know, 2026,
this is a conversation we've been covering for
years that connects back to Israel
and in regard to spyware, which they were
sort of a leader of. Okay? So here's
where this gets even more important.
Derek, as I said, wrote this in 2024.
Already telling you about NSO, but above a
lot of them. Some some you've heard. Sellbrite,
Clearview AI saying,
meet the tech spyware companies they're preparing to
unleash in their in Trump's second term, which
that's not what anybody should want, guys. That's
because he opened this door. K?
2024,
Biden,
I signed $2,000,000
contract with spyware maker, Paragon Solutions.
So that that's that's the same overlapping point.
Twenty twenty four, October.
October,
ICE's $2,000,000 contract with spyware vendor is under
White House review.
Now I'm of the mind that I don't
think this is really Biden concerned about this.
They've been allowing this invasiveness for a long
time.
But I just think that the way that
before the Trump time frame, these people at
least tried to make it look like they
weren't doing but I think they were just
as much involved with this. But whatever you
think about it, Biden
publicly acted like he was gonna pull this
under review. Okay?
Then before we get to the point where
Trump steps him, 12/20/2024.
So at this point, it's in limbo, right,
where Biden is essentially
I'm I'm gonna review this because these spyware
things are problematic.
Israeli spyware maker
bought in US private equity in rare move,
12/20/2024.
The US private equity firm, AE Industrial Partners,
or just cons or just sometimes called AEI,
has acquired one of Israel's leading spyware companies
in a move that's injected enthusiasm
into the Middle Eastern countries' scandal plagued surveillance
technology industry. They are not a Middle Eastern
country, for crying out loud. Well, I mean,
technically, they are, but in the sense of
what we're talking about in the world. But,
I mean, what's funny is it's like one
point that when they want to, they wanna
claim they're part of Europe. Right? And if
they're not, they're they're technically very much part
of Middle East. My point is that who
what they are and what they demonstrate. It's
you know, the Palestinians were part of the
Middle East. Anyway, the point is
The U, US private equity firm, AE Industrial
Partners, acquired
the Israeli spyware company. As it says,
the scandal plagued surveillance technology industry. Scandal plagued
by largely Israel. A, AE,
AE Industrial Partners plans to merge
Paragon
with Red Lattice,
a US cybersecurity
firm that it owns,
said the person.
But Paragon will continue to operate
out of Israel
and has plans to expand its footprint, the
person added.
Paragon spyware is designed to hack into phones
and covertly gather messages
that are sent using encrypted messages.
Oh, so basically to be able to see
what you're sending on encrypted apps like Signal.
Got it.
And WhatsApp.
Okay. So in case you missed the point,
the Israeli spyware maker
was bought
by a US private equity firm called AE
Industrial pair partners
who
merged that Israeli spyware company with Red Lattice,
which is a Virginia based
US company.
Okay.
I'm sure you can see where this is
going. So that went forward as a US
based company. Even though Israel operates,
Paragon
operates out of Israel.
See how that works? It has con this
this shell game cover,
in my opinion. Now this is you you
could argue it's still not connected to the
White House app. Certainly.
What I'm trying to show you is a
deeper connection of Israeli spyware that is basically
melded just mashed together with The US industry
here.
Then
in September of the next year, twenty twenty
twenty five,
Trump gives green light
for a $2,000,000
ICE deal with notorious Israeli
spyware company.
So now the one that Biden had on
hold was now green lit.
Right? But after they have basically made it
look as if it's more of a a
US leaning entity. Probably their only way to
get beyond
the, you know, framing of the legal situation.
The Times of Israel, Trump administration reinstates contract
with Israeli founded spyware maker, Paragon.
Graphite,
Month this is later in the month. The
Israeli spyware acquired by ICE.
Right? So you can see how this keeps
going. Right? And so at this point, though,
it still takes really spyware,
but they've
blended with red lattice
and are now a Virginia based element, even
though it still works out of Israel.
Here, GovTribe, red lattice incorporated. Now just take
a step back. Now that we just made
it clear that the Israeli spyware company blended
with red lattice,
which is funny how you wouldn't then go,
they both become Israeli companies. You still go,
they both become US companies, even though they
work out of Israel. It seems like a
choice. But in this case, let's look at
what other things red lattice is tied to.
So what I'm trying to highlight here is
that RedLattice that is blended with Paragon, which
is an invasively dangerous Israeli spyware company,
also happens to have tons of overlap with
the US government.
RedLattice Incorporated,
doing business as RedLattice Inc, is a leading
provider of advanced cyber capabilities
for government and Fortune 500 markets worldwide, by
the way, but US predominantly. The company specializes
in cybersecurity services and solutions for complex operational
challenges,
offering expertise in vulnerability assessment. Fantastic.
Malware analysis,
reverse engineering, software development, and operating system security.
As a federal contractor, Red Lattice provides a
range of information technology and cybersecurity products and
services to US government agencies,
particularly
the Department of Air Force and Air Education
and Training Command. The company's
offerings are designed to address evolving cyber defense
needs across the federal government.
Interesting.
The company's subcontracting
work includes providing qualified personnel for cyber missions
force cyber mission force capability development,
as well as supplying various cyber related products
and software solutions,
including
the Vale infrastructure well, to be clear,
that's end is ended for the podcast and
software solutions, period. New paragraph halfway down. Including
the Vale infrastructure platform, Tahoe testing framework, vulnerability
assessments via Phantom, and engineering services for securing
IT systems.
My concern
there's more little like this. One of these
is a $92,000,000
project. There's a bunch of different contracts. We're
talking about a massive company that is embedded
with tons of different cyber and military elements.
And in case you missed the point, that
is Israeli spyware. That is literally Paragon solutions.
I don't know why that shouldn't matter to
people. So back to the point,
if what we're talking about
is
the White House app
that is built by our government or at
least with connect you know, coordinated through the
White House, and we can quite literally see
that few years ago, whatever what was the,
in 2024, couple of years of two two
years ago, three years ago,
blended with a US company, and that company
is now involved with tons of government stuff,
you could easily argue that a lot of
these things are interconnected as well. I might
even try to make that case. You can
you can, you know, decide. I'm not trying
to be subjective and just say that makes
everything Israeli connected. I'm not. But it's undeniable
that that's the reality and that these companies
are embedded,
immersed
with US Government
infrastructure,
military, everything.
And that they're rolling out an app now
that is shamelessly spyware? I'm sure you can
consider the overlapping concerns.
And we'll continue with this.
Oh, I'm glad I remember that by the
way.
Also,
on this back to this, article about the
Red Lattice Incorporated
in government interconnectivity,
take a look at when it all started.
And I'm sure you'll be able to find
the year correlation. Right? So the explosion of
this pretty much started once they started to
work their way in.
This,
to me,
you've seen both.
I just shared it again just to put
it in one place.
But as always, listen to these in light
of what we just talked about. And this
is about not just technology. This is about
companies. It's about invasive
action. Israel
is has proudly
bragged
about doing this, and here they are.
In fact, let me do this. I haven't
both uploaded, but I the one I'll I
cut together one just to do it as
one clip. Who did they buy it from?
Or I think they were buying it from.
We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
shell companies over shell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our state. Did you see
any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah. Like, I
mean, intelligent surprises. They just walk you talk.
Do you know how many equip equipment I
mean, treated equipment do we have in these
countries?
You can't you don't. I do.
You mean type of equipment? You mean you
mean booby trapped equipment?
Not only booby trapped and spying Manipulated equipment.
Alright. In which countries are you looking at?
All the countries that you can imagine.
I you know?
Amazing what people could choose to ignore.
It's right there in front of you. It's
right there.
You know, and you could argue it's all
lies, but we just went through provable information
that shows you an undeniable connection and overlap,
a merging
of these two things.
I just really hope people could put this
together and see the reality of where we
actually are.
Now here's a couple of other points that
add to that invasiveness that I just came
across that I think are alarming.
This is from s two underground. It says,
this is also we'll start with this one,
actually. Start from SOAR Atlas.
It says, many people have asked why satellite
imagery showing damage in Israel this is becoming
kind of a big talking point for people,
and I'm glad it is. Why asking why
damage in Israel isn't available on our platform?
This is a like a,
GPS sort of,
satellite imagery. And it says this is primarily
due to limitations in the available satellite data
along with current restrictions in place during this
conflict. So two different things.
The current restrictions is the important part.
The,
restrictions placed on during this conflict is the
same problem, but more specifically pointed
targeted.
I'll I'll make that clear in a second.
Large scale damage in Iran is often visible
in freely available satellite imagery due to its
scale, for example, impacts on air bases, industrial
facilities, extensive smoke plumes. In contrast, impacts in
Israel have been reported to be typically smaller,
more localized, often affecting individual buildings and streets,
which usually fell fall fall below the resolution
of free satellites. And it's you know, that's
the excuse really, but as you see I'm
not I shouldn't even say that. They're just
kinda saying that's possible, which is true. But
it says open source satellites imagery collected by
the likes of the European Space Agency and
NASA have a coarser resolution compared to them.
This means the damage can be difficult to
detect unless it occurs large scale.
Now it says, in saying this, that's this
is the point. We highly encourage anyone to
explore and investigate areas of interest using the
free tools available on SOAR Atlas. We're also
always open to communicate community suggestions.
Oh, wait. Hold on.
Yeah. It says,
this means that damage can be difficult to
detect. Detecting this level requires high resolution imagery.
Oh, no. I'm sorry. So I I'm just
mixing them together. So he adds the the
law that explains
why this is happening. So just starting to
the bottom line,
go back to this, is what they're saying
here is simply that, you know, that we
have there's issues with this, and there's certain,
locations where this is hard to see. And
in saying this, we are encouraging anyone to
explore and investigate this. We do not take
sides. And so what what this person is
pointing out, it's also pertinent to remind people
of basically why this is happening.
That in some locations it's blurred out, which
people are starting to see and some not.
Remind that The United States has a special
law
that only applies to Israel,
which restricts the resolution of imagery that can
be offered by American companies.
The Kyle Bingman, Bingaman Amendments in 1997,
NDAA, which is always where it seems to
slip in, prohibits high resolution imagery,
specifically of Israel. This law stipulates that American
companies have to reduce their resolution to deliberately
censor their imagery
to be in line with the lowest common
denominator resolution scale.
Of note, this restriction does not apply to
the homeland United States. Companies like Maxar, Planet,
and Ventor,
Ventor
can offer extremely high resolution satellite imagery.
Israel
is the only place on Earth that is
censored by law by the US government.
Right? You can look at you you ask
you can look all over The United States,
but this America First administration was not just
them, but the government here are blocking viewing
of Israel.
The only reason we have any imagery of
Israel at all is due to European companies
and so on. Okay. So you get the
point, guys.
So for anyone who's curious as to why
it's always a challenge to find out what
locations have been struck in Israel, this is
a contributing factor.
They're censoring your view of that.
Now somebody even asked Grok down here, Grok,
please explain asymmetric
accommodation.
And it says asymmetric accommodation describes The United
States' unique one way policy favoring Israel. And
it spoke points out the amendment where it
show basically licensed firms from
stop firms from selling imagery of Israel sharper
than non US commercial sources. Applied,
nowhere else.
I mean, how do you miss that?
How would I mean, why wouldn't you wouldn't
do for The UK? Right? Only
Israel. I just don't know how you miss
that. Now if you wanna just suddenly make
it only about one religion, that's you doing
that. Nobody else is doing this. It's about
Israel and what and the reality of what
our government allows for their government actions, for
their ongoing genocide, for their set for the
what they do to Jewish people in Israel,
by the way. The Orthodox Jews, they get
beat up by IDF every single day in
that country because they speak out against Zionism.
The point is very clear.
We just have to start being honest about
it, guys.
Now in regard to the larger picture,
somebody, this guy came out and pointed this
out. I think the map is I mean,
I think there are different versions of it,
but it's the same general point. He says
Turkish journalists came out and made this point,
and he said, this is Israel's alleged game
plan.
Prolong the war so that all countries in
the region become exhausted,
Drag Gulf countries into the conflict and fuel
sectarian tensions between Sunnis and Shias. Yep. Long
term. Turn a a Saudi Iran war into
a wider conflict by involving Pakistan and stirring
unrest among Shias in Pakistan,
push Kurds into Iran, and provide conflict between
Iranian Turks and Kurds, yep, in Iraq, which
we keep telling you, pit Kurdish groups against
the popular mobilization forces exactly like we talked
about to ignite Arab Kurd tensions, draw Syria
into conflict with Shia groups in Iraq, same
point, occupy half Lebanese parts of Syria,
all of the West Bank, half of Lebanon,
parts of Syria West Bank, annex Gaza, displaced
Palestinians, weaken Turkey through waves of migration,
drive entire region into chaos, ultimately establish greater
Israel. Now there's floated points about Turkey now
maybe joining Iran's side. I'm a little bit
skeptical of all of that, but I believe
that is floating around right now.
But as I said, long have many of
us warned
this was driving US foreign policy.
Right? Hard to deny that now if you're
not being completely
blind,
but some are sure trying.
But think about this, and here's the this
is the one that's at least like, this
is almost identical to the patch they use.
This is the one that I think is
the most
accurate to what they're really doing. But, look,
my opinion is they would take as much
as they could. That's who these people are.
But I'll play this clip too since it's
important to hear that plan and where that
leads.
And I think what you know, the the
important part here
is just that this has always guided the
policy of the US government. Whether they even
know it or not, this has been the
plan. This starts and it's it's really fascinating
to go back. It starts, in 1996
with Netanyahu
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite,
straightforward and,
and and,
very dangerous.
He says, you know, there are there's Hamas,
there's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel. It's not good
for us to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple
the governments
that that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout The Middle East. And
he actually gave a long list of seven
countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan,
and Lebanon.
And systematically,
The United States has done
Netanyahu's bidding for almost thirty years now,
going to war with every one of them
except for the big one, that Netanyahu
so much longs for, which is the war
directly
between The United States and Iran.
And now it's happening.
Right? Like like, legitimately happening. Not not just
the kind of back and forth, which is
always leading there. You know? And when that
that statement was made or many I've made
in the past hadn't happened yet, And here
we are. It's kinda hard to ignore. Right?
I mean, it's just like it's just like
clockwork, guys. And here is Netanyahu
for whatever reason, because this is a new
clip
telling you the point.
Netanyahu goes, as they write, fully psychotic and
tells the world that he will single handedly
change the entire face of the Middle East.
Yep. And that Israel will attack any country
at any time. Exactly.
He says we will surprise them instead of
them surprising us. We are the attacking side.
We are the initiating side. We take the
initiative. Yeah. Kind of you, Netanyahu, to make
that very clear. We always knew that if
we weren't blindly partisan.
You guys started this. We know that.
This is just them telling you where this
really goes. I almost think it's because he
needs to gain support with his people to
say, look. I'm try I've been promising you.
I told you I could get them to
do this. Here we are. Now we're in
charge. Just, you know, back me, and I
think he's gaining support because of it.
And and I think and what is he
doing? He's letting Trump take the ball,
and it seems like that's okay for him.
I don't understand that. Now I'm actually gonna
pretty much wrap right there, but I'm gonna
quickly go over the things I wanna show
you. Just keep it in your mind. We'll
we'll talk about more of this next show.
But on on top of that, in in
the same conversation, Mohammed Safa from the UN
has resigned in protest. And he says after
much reflection and after it became clear to
me that some UN seniors
are serving a powerful lobby, I'm sure you
know what he's talking about and not the
UN, I had decided to suspend all my
duties as the PBA main representative at the
UN and form all UN committees
and from all UN committees groups of which
I am a member. I cannot in good
conscious be part of or witness to what
is happening at a time when the UN
is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use.
That's a that's something that they're not that's
he's saying. So consider he's not you you
know, consider he's wrong. Consider he's lying.
But he has been consistently calling this out
from the beginning to his to his detriment
about Gaza.
And the point is he's telling you the
UN is considering possible nuclear weapon use in
the sense that they,
planning for it being done in the world.
Why do you think that's coming from? It's
very obvious, especially since the UN has many
times made clear that they don't believe UN
has a nuclear weapon. So it's pretty clear
we all know what Israel might do, and
that's and even US and even Rubio made
that statement.
And so it's been an honor cooperating with
the UN for nearly twelve years under different
secretary generals,
human rights council presidents.
May god bless this world.
He also adds,
punishing me by closing my wife's bank account.
So can you just you you feel the
familiar tactics, guys?
What does she have to do with all
this? She's an EU ordinary citizen, but they
closed her bank account because he quit the
UN?
I'm sure you know where this is coming
from. I'm not even making it out one
group. It's this is a court. This is
what we deal with. COVID nineteen, trucker convoy,
you do the wrong thing, the power structure
step on your neck. And these and this
is what what is he doing?
He's he quit. It it's it's because he's
making it his life's mission
to call all this out. Sort of this.
And he says, as far as I know,
people are are betting on my head on
Twitter right now on the other platforms. He
says, I'm making it publicly known I'm not
suicidal. But he points out all these different
threats he's getting from, you know, random accounts
that are saying your time will come soon.
He's just saying, look, they're they're threatening me,
and he quit. And they're still doing it.
Here,
on top of that, Saeed Mohammed Mehrendi, you
might have seen this. For over four days,
he posted this back on twenty fourth. Twitter
and Elon Musk have allowed a Zionist Ukrainian
group to use Twitter to literally raise millions
of dollars to try to kidnap him. And
I'm not even joking. They're literally crowdfunding to
find him and keep him alive. That's what
they're and this is not a joke, by
the way.
Crowdfunding this. And it and not only that,
it's allowed to be paid partnership
on
Twitter. Oh, but don't worry. They added some
context.
I mean and he's been screaming about this.
And he goes, it, of course, clearly implies
torture and murder, yet not a single western
official, journalist, or media led will condemn it,
let alone investigate.
Can you wonder why? Can you factor that
in? Of course, Patrick Hannan said a great
interview with him. You can watch it, talking
about this. $1,000,000
bounty.
The day and it's just it's just it's
it's beyond the pale, guys.
Lastly, we just briefly quit, you know, to
wrap up. We talked about the lies of
his of Trump negotiation with Iran. I'm pretty
sure we can all just establish that that
was a big lie since we're here and
Iran's turned down his point plan and maybe
something changes in a couple days by the
sixth. I doubt it. But that's the reality.
He pretended to have some defector he was
talking with. That didn't happen. He put forward
a 15 plan to Iran's leadership that moments
ago, he says we're irrelevant and probably hiding
in caves, and then they turned it down.
It's just absurd where we are. So as
of right now, they turned down his offer
to cease fire for the second time as
Israel continued to bomb, which is the point.
So not only did Israel bomb,
The US alongside them in cases did, and
they literally bombed a nuclear power plant, which,
by the way,
explicitly was included with Trump's idea of infrastructure.
So Trump puts on a pause for ten
days and says, we won't bomb, and then
they bomb anyway. And not only do they
bomb, they bomb the very infrastructure that he
claimed they wouldn't target. We'll go over this
tomorrow.
Iran says Israeli strikes violated Trump's deadline. Of
course, they did.
But you and also because you can show
that Israel is coordinating in some cases with
US elements, which shows you that either way,
though. Are we they told us this is
a joint war. They're both claiming they're fighting
Iran, but yet somehow Trump can make a
thing and Israel can just keep going and
no one calls that out. How does nobody
see how clear that is? Not even the
corporate media, many cases, outside of things like
this where Iran says the thing. Oh, Oh,
you mean aside from us having eyes, the
hill, can you not acknowledge that happened? Of
course, it did. Israel told you. They've publicly
claimed that they bombed that nuclear facility.
It's a it's a it's a civilian nuclear
power plant. It's what it is. And even
if it's not, it does not, then suddenly
it then suddenly doesn't become
he said he would not bomb anything within
that area. That's what he said.
So whether or not you think it's weapons,
despite all the evidence showing you it's not,
still counts.
My point is they just do it anyway.
Yemen is now saying they're gonna join the
war.
And what they said is interesting, saying they're
still adhering to a cease fire they did
with with the US government from 2025
Cause they seemingly have principles and honor. And
the point is, they said, we're gonna go
at this in Israel. But if you if
you bomb us, Trump, you're now you violate
ceasefire. How much you wanna bet he does
anyway?
We have Russia
having drone strike second largest refineries.
Who's to say? If it's Ukraine or Israel
or that you could realize both the same
thing at this point. The point to me
or maybe Russia did it himself. That's possible.
The reality is it is
increasing the dramatic problem with the oil infrastructure,
which you can see that from a global
coordinated manipulation if you want, or you can
recognize Israel's trying to do it to put
people in certain positions or think about the
different possibilities.
Either way, it is continuing. And someone's pulling
on these strings, guys.
And reality of what they've been doing in
Iran, in case you haven't paying attention, is
disgusting.
As the foreign minister reports, take it with
a grain of salt, but you can easily
verify most of these things, demolish 22 schools
a day.
40 kids per day in Iran. Here's even
the BBC. Iranian schools, hospitals, landmarks among civilian
sites hit. They can't hide from this, guys.
It's being very well documented regardless of what
they say. Here is p jet like, just
as in Gaza, Trida points out, The US
is lifting the constraints on how Israel can
use American bombs. 2,000 pound bombs
in the core of Tehran.
And by the way, you know when you
start a Twitter a Twitter post? You refresh
it and and and the video starts playing?
Guess what? Not one of this kind of
content.
Bart, check for yourself.
I did this with every other post I've
had. Every other one starts playing, but not
this one. Gee, I wonder why. Well, because
it's showing you Iranian children suffering because they're
bombing in Tehran. That's why. That's my opinion.
I guess it's just a glitch. You know?
Funny how that works on this Elon Brooking
platform. Well, Patrick Hannesen points out
is this is Iran, you know, an Iran
university that they're bombing.
And Patrick says this is what they do.
Israel in The US now targeting their universities.
It's really what they do every single time.
The Iranian government says more than 93,233
civilians have have civilian facilities and 600 schools
have been damaged since the start of the
war. That's what they were giving those numbers
for.
Channel twelve, of course, says that
in case of a US ground invasion in
Iran, I hope you're listening America First, MAGA
people, Israeli soldiers will not participate on the
ground. Gee, it's almost like we literally called
that. I'm sure other people did too, but
I explicitly
made this case.
They will not be on the ground.
Now that's channel twelve. Channel twelve could be
wrong. Channel twelve could just be saying what
they think.
I believe this is what will happen. God
forbid this ridiculous government drives Americans into this
country for no justifiable reason and commits another
war crime. Israel will stand by and let
it happen.
And maybe, maybe, that'll reach a few more
people to recognize what's really going on. God
forbid that has to happen to get it
there. Let's hope we can stop it.
I'll end today
with the great Carrie Wedler.
Leave it there for the day. We will
see you tomorrow. Thank you for tuning in.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. There are a lot of huge
lies about the war in Iran. That the
Iranian government post an imminent threat to The
United States, the chronic omission of the fact
that the CIA played a direct role in
the rise of the Iranian regime, that Trump
isn't Israel's bitch, or that The US ruling
establishment cares at all about innocent Iranians. But
the biggest lie of all is that we
are at war with Iran. We, as in
hundreds of millions of American people, are not
attacking Iran. We are not bombing Iran, killing
civilians, or doing Israel's bidding. The soldiers in
the US military and the ruling class master's
barking commands at them are. You are quite
literally not the military, and you are not
the authoritarians who hallucinate that they have a
right to commit violence in your name. You've
simply been indoctrinated to believe that We, the
people, are the government. We are the government.
We are the government. We are the government.
We are the government. According to this delusional
logic, we have lied repeatedly to
slaughtered children during the occupation of The Philippines.
We poisoned Vietnamese people with chemical weapons. We
bombed civilians in World War two. We imported
Nazi scientists to work for the US government.
We experimented with mind control. We infiltrated the
media with propaganda, and we probably still do
those things. Things. And today, apparently, we have
racked up $38,000,000,000,000
of debt with reckless spending on war and
big government. We spy on ourselves. We cook
up terroblasts to boil. We promote and defend
the use of toxic pesticides. We protect predators,
and we prop up human rights abusing regimes.
Except we didn't and don't do any of
those things. People claiming to possess the right
to wield violent authority didn't do. Believing otherwise
is conditioned collected as fiction. In reality, there
are people in positions of power who claim
extra special rights to compel their order followers,
many of whom have good intentions but are
also indoctrinated, to commit acts of violence on
one hand. And on the other hand, there
are the rest of us, most of whom
would never assert that we as individuals have
such a right. And yet through special rituals,
incantations,
uniforms, sacred scrolls, and a barrage of propaganda
from our youngest years, we outsource our identity
and agency to these people, believing they're extensions
of ourselves who represent, serve, and protect us.
Even though we don't have a right to
commit violence, government agents who allegedly derive their
authority and right to rule from we the
people somehow do. In addition to the conflation
of people with the governments that rule over
them, nations are often conflated with governments. America
did this, Iran did that, Israel did other
things. False. Ruling authoritarians
exploiting national identities and soldiers. If you ever
wanna see solutions to the many problems governments
create, a necessary start is to stop believing
we are the government. Disabusing yourself from the
belief that these sociopaths have any legitimate right
to rule over you, let alone argue. This
delusion enables all the other lies they tell
and atrocities they commit. But if you still
believe you are the government, why don't you
go fight?