You're not real.
What?
You are?
Is any of it real? I mean, look
at this.
Look at it.
A world built
on fences. Synthetic emotions in the form of
pills. Psychological warfare in the form of advertising.
Mind altering chemicals in the form of food.
Brainwashing
seminars in the form of media.
Isolated bubbles in the form of social networks.
Real?
You wanna talk about reality?
We haven't lived in anything remotely close to
it since the turn of the century. We
turned it off, forgot the batteries stacked on
a bag of GMOs while we Toss the
remnants in the ever expanding dumpster
of the human killer. Branded houses, trademarked by
corporations
built on bipolar
numbers, jumping up and down on digital displays,
hypnotizing us. One of the biggest slumber mankind
has ever seen. You dig pretty deep, kiddo,
before you can find anything where you live
in a kingdom of
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Help your own voice. Help your own voice.
Stay in joy.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thursday, 03/26/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now the conversation we've been having around the
negotiation that Trump has claimed to have had
has taken a lot of very interesting turns
moment to moment.
But my point the entire time has been
that I feel we've been being deceived, and
I think that's very clear.
I think it's I mean, I I it
let's let's be
let's not dance around what we can obviously
see and and acknowledge that there's been, like,
blatant lies that he's told. Now that could
mean that he's playing the, you
know, the the the tactics that he likes
to praise in his books and so on,
which is just dishonesty at the end of
the day, but results oriented as he is.
Ultimately, the argument could be that he's trying
to maneuver through this to get Iran where
he wants them to get the deal. And
but, you know,
if that if you agree with that, so
be it. But acknowledge that if while that's
happening, he's lying to you. He's lying to
everybody.
And many most people that support that accept
that as it's you know, that's the game
he's playing with all the rest of them.
But when you dive through more of it
as it's into today, especially,
it starts to appear as if it's almost
just entirely whole cloth. Just just creating a
narrative out of nowhere
to try to get people to feel like,
oh, maybe he is talking to somebody. Maybe
we should make a deal if he's talking
and I I find it to be desperate.
As I've been saying the entire time. But
I'll we'll go through some new points today
on this on that that topic and
and maybe open another door to what it
could possibly be
with the discussion of oil tankers being the
present that he told you he was given
with the interesting part of the
GPS elements showing that that didn't happen.
Okay? So
is that him lying?
Is that him being lied to? Right? Is
is somebody else manipulating him, Israel, even Iran?
But then how would he think that happened?
That must be his inner circle that's lying
to him. And I find that to be
really interesting. And that speaks to the point
that's sort of how we've always wondered if
if he is being cowed, manipulated,
handled.
Is he aware of
that, any president? And, you know, and if
and or is that something that is, you
know, playing on his hubris,
which I think is very obvious with this
person, to be able to manipulate him into
thinking that he's the smartest one in the
room, that he he's his decision will be
the most important when you can easily create
a situation where whatever choice he makes in
a limited view gives them what they want.
I think that's always been a way that
this country has been manipulated. But today, it's
especially clear with this person.
But there's a lot to get to today.
It's quite a bit we're gonna talk about.
But that obvious point of the ongoing,
you know, I think just this dangerous drift
this country is in with, you know, whatever's
driving Trump's decision making process,
It's obviously getting more and more concerning for
everybody.
Republicans,
Democrats, those aware of it all being a
joke. And, clearly, it's it's something that is,
I mean, becoming so obvious to people that
are like, at the point that I'm trying
to continue to highlight through all these things
is
see the bigger picture. Not that the right
is lying in this moment, but that the
government is playing us all through something like
this. And I think everyone a lot of
people, more than usual, are starting to see
that, like I've been highlighting. And right now,
it's becoming, okay. Well, these are the same
people that we thought we were fighting.
Same war, the same technocratic
governance, the same you know, all the same
agendas are playing out in the same way.
Now, again, note that a lot of us
warned about that. Then we'd know for sure,
but one of the I mean, if not
exactly what's happening right now, for very close,
we were discussing before this was happening that
this was likely where this administration would go.
Likely no different than Kamala, to be quite
honest, and that's why we're discussing how there
could have been a different path or we
can hopefully continue to discuss why other options
can be taken than just falling into the
same broken lesser of evils dynamic that they
falsely created for us. But I'm glad to
see that that is happening.
And noticing that no matter what we say
and no matter what we think, that the
thing that it just continues. And then on
top of that, that weirdly enough, and it's
not weird if you're paying attention, it's very
obvious and has been the same way for
a long time. CNN and Fox News seem
to have basically
the same argument. Now the difference
is CNN or or Democrat media or liberal
media saying Trump is lying, and he is,
by the way, plenty of ways, and say,
wait. That's that's their big point that we
could tell he's deceiving us. But guess what's
the common thread That the war should continue
and that Iran's a bad guy, that we
have to do it the right way, which
I would even agree with if you're just
gonna talk about the legal dynamic. But this
should not be happening at all. And there
is no legal dynamic with how they did
this or how they could have done this
without
just
manufacturing it like we've played many times, the
illegal dynamics or rather the, what's the frame
they use? We're in the the game of
using covert means against the Iranians, and that's
the idea. Both sides. But so to realize
that this has been something that has been
drifting and both sides of the paradigm have
always been aligned with it. Both sides of
the media have always been driving it and
supporting it. And then when it happens,
the group that's supposed to be adversarial is
suddenly basically cheering it on. I just think
it really exposes
the long term play.
I think most people are seeing that. Now
other than that topic, and we're gonna have
a lot of the points we can get
into around the Strait Of Hormuz and how
that point connects to it, and,
just the bigger point of what this connects
to, I'm gonna get to some other things
to start today, which I thought were really
interesting. One of which we've discussed back in
February, which was the Israeli owned biolab
that was
shut down, which connected back to the original
biolab. You have California. You got Las Vegas.
There's a couple different points that connect to
this. And how interesting it is that that
story basically disappeared after it turned out it
was owned by an Israeli. Didn't disappear, but
it just didn't there was no momentum from
the government perspective. And a lot of the
people who were really keeping that in view,
mostly the MAGA discussion, they just stopped talking
about it, which I think that speaks for
itself.
Now the point was about a Chinese person
who was who was, I think, renting the
was in control of the the area,
and but the owner was Israeli. Now how
that plays out, we'll get into to begin
with, is in very important and how it
DropSite News recently covering it. There's a new
article that came out, and I think it's
important to highlight the aftermath of that. And
I think you already know where it goes,
but it's important to see. And there's more
information that came out with the new article
about what they found in his house.
Oh,
it's I think it's,
it's right here.
Ori Solomon was his name. And we talked
about this last time, if you remember. I'll
show you the article we discussed it in.
And what they found there and what didn't
happen and what is probably never going to
happen. We're gonna quickly point out something in
the beginning of, what Derek was just doing
in least now at CPAC and interviewing some
people. He got an interview with,
what was his name again?
Bovino.
Interesting responses we'll point to.
Some good I'm gonna I'm gonna try to
cover some a bunch of stuff today that
that are, you know, just kinda passing things
that I don't usually get into, smaller points,
partisan stuff, just stuff that I'm gonna pull
in because as this is technically sort of
the end
of my you know, where I'm getting to
at the end of my week, essentially, which
I'm laughing myself. For those that have been
seeing what I'm trying to do and keeping
the consistent work and the consistent days of
the show and trying to take more time,
like, maybe one, two days in a row
to, like, handle my life, my point is
when I do it this many days in
a row, I I watch something happen over
the weekend that I'm gonna definitely cover and
then it will spin that plan out. But
my goal is to try to keep that
consistent work going, which means I'll probably be
taking the next couple days off or at
least one, and trying to pull myself out
of it, which I strongly recommend we all
do. As much as it's difficult, and in
fact, it's important to keep attuned to this
stuff, It's also really important to be able
to break away and not be have your
phone on your hip the whole time you're
supposed to not be which is what I
had been doing for a long time, but
need to fully break away. Put the phone
in the pouch, break away, go outside, spend
at least a day completely disconnected.
Now I'm saying all that because my point
at the end right now is probably gonna
longer show. I wanted to include a lot
of the stuff that I had, you know,
maybe put aside to focus on the bigger
topics that have been happening. Some of which
revolve around some things that I was gonna
talk about yesterday, which we'll get to around
the,
what was it called again, the adviser the,
the council on on advisors on science technology.
Basically, it's a technocratic startup. You know? And
it's it's interesting to see who's involved, and
it's everyone that we all thought we were
fighting. And I mean everybody, including the Republicans,
who are suddenly on the team, just like
when they were in his inauguration. And, you
know, it's just saying, it's it's how many
times can we not recognize
what it shows us when the same things
keep happening or the same lies keep being
told or the same promises keep being broken?
Now a bunch of points I wanna make
about what I think the partisan game is
doing right now.
Like, what I've been generally highlighting, you know,
the the, you know, oh my god. Look
at the Obama story again and again and
again, which I agree with. Put him in
jail. He's a criminal. I agree. Maybe for
different reasons than you may think, but I
definitely think he's a criminal. And I'm just
probably saying that
because all these people have committed war crimes.
All these people have lied to us over
our lives. The point, though, is that I
never believed it was gonna happen because I
don't think they actually are, you know, adversarial
in the legal sense. I'm sure they hate
each other to some degree. But, you know,
what about Biden? Or what about all the
big claims and Social Security fraud and what
Minnesota? I mean, all the different things we've
been told and hyped and talked about, whether
real or not.
Or Epstein files for crying out loud. Funny
how that story just doesn't exist anymore.
For the for us, it does, and we'll
just keep talking about it. It's not gonna
go away, but the spotlight has been removed
and the mainstream alternative mainstream just pretend like
it doesn't exist.
You have to start noting that and recognize
those people and make a note of it.
Look at their work. Look at everybody's work.
But recognize who's out there for wrong reasons
and who's deceiving.
And be Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Ellison and
Marc Andreessen and Sergey Brin. Yeah. That's that's
a that's the good guy team that's backing
Trump on his technocratic venture, isn't it?
We'll also talk about a lot of the
different distractions that are coming out to push
away from this, talk about some points on
technocracy
that are building around us, as well as
a 1,250,000,000
aid that was sent to
Donald Trump's new board of peace.
You know? Because he's just board of peace
today, apparently. And my but as much as
much as it's all about, you know,
just the ongoing warfare, the point is that
this is ultimately
stealing from you. And we'll talk about that.
I don't know why that's America first when
it's a global dynamic or why that's not
obviously globalism, Alex Jones. You know, the obvious
reality of how clearly everything
it's just it's embarrassing how clear it is.
And now he's taking over $1,000,000,000
from taxpayer money to be put into something
that goes outside of this country. He claims
it'll be for Gaza, but it's basically a
slush fund because this is not something that's
accountable at all. And we'll talk about
that. We'll talk about the over
COVID nineteen connection that I think connects with
the distraction conversation, which I think is just
interesting, the coming out right now after all
this time, and some much other larger other
points we'll get to Iran. And if I
have time today, I wanna end with just
a section that just continues to highlight what
what one, what is continuing to happen in
Gaza and what Israel continues to do and
what it continues to be, their government and
what they continue to demonstrate. The statements like
there is nobody innocent in Gaza. There are
no innocent children killed. There every child is
a terrorist when they're born. These are coming
from the mouths of people in leading positions
of Israel's government, but we don't talk about
that. You know where you don't hear those
things? From Ron's government. That's not to say
they don't think that. They very well could
be just as just as vicious. I think
every government is capable of that. The difference
is you over here, you have them proudly
saying this with all of their audiences and
their teams and their peers cheering. Over here,
you don't.
Doesn't mean they don't think that, but recognize
how interesting that is with the conversation, and
one side gets called out all the time.
Now let's start with
Derek's point.
I'm I wanted to make sure you guys
see this because he's gonna be out there
over the next couple of days interviewing people,
discussing it. Now if we have time and
it connects, it's usually about the difference of
timing of our you know, when I'm setting
the show up and when he's ready, but
we're gonna try to do something where he
can be, you know, kind of jump in
live and just kinda give you some updates,
but half the time, our our our hours
are are not overlapping. But I'm gonna play
this for you really quickly. This is what
Derek just posted.
CPAC
exclusive, retiring border patrol hardliner Bovino has no
regrets on Freddy's shooting.
Denies US citizens detained, which is just insane
to me. You know, I'll play it for
I'll let it speak for itself. We'll talk
about it quickly.
But just think about the whether this is
dishonesty
or that he just doesn't know.
In the in the last couple days, newly
confirmed DHS secretary, Mullen, has said he regrets
statements he made after the shooting death of
Alex Creddie. Do you regret any statements or
actions you took around those shootings in Minnesota?
Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Every single statement was
the truth?
No. It wasn't. And you could prove that.
In fact, literally everybody, including Trump's administration, many
of them admitted that those things were a
little bit hyperbolic.
Not this guy. That's why he got pushed
away because these guys are extremely radical.
No difference in most people in government positions,
quite honestly. But realize
that what they said about that was proven
to be false. Terrorist and monster, everything they
did, Noam and him were some of the
most egregious. And notice how those two are
not been shoved to the side. And that's
not because I think they care about the
fact that they hold those opinions. It's because
they're bad at relaying it to you. Regret
no statements.
And, we move forward here. We don't capitulate
the folks that hate America.
Do you he made after the shooting death
of Alex Creddy? Do you regret any statements
or actions you took around those shootings in
Minnesota? Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Every single statement
was the truth. I regret no statements.
And, we move forward here. We don't capitulate
the folks that hate America. We don't capitulate
the folks who hate America.
What does that even mean?
So what are we talking about? Are we
now suggesting that the only thing the only
world in which that could be possible is
that somebody who hates America lied about that?
You know, again, despite the fact that we
can quite literally prove that he was wrong
in every possible way.
You you see, this is the kind of
rhetoric I'm talking about. My opinion is he
knows he is standing in line.
Truth for people like this, I would argue
borderline sociopath, if not over the top, doesn't
even factor in, guys. It's about narrative control.
It's about what they want you to think
they're supposed to be. It's insane to me.
It's insane that we can stand that we
don't capitulate to people who hate America
by asking, do you regret lying about what
happened to Preti?
I'm not gonna do that. Do you think
you got enough support from the Trump administration
following those days? President Trump is the best
president I've ever worked for. He's small creatures
in that administration that, probably need to go,
but president Trump man has That's quite okay.
So, yeah, love Trump. He's the best. Right.
Because clearly, you don't if you don't say
that, you you get dumped or, you know,
negative things happen to you because terms are
very petty, it seems. But some other people
in the midst have to go.
Isn't that interesting? Wouldn't it continue to show
you that that's the you know, at the
same time, though, when you when you talk
to the team sport players that are all
screaming about how winning we are right now,
it's that everyone's the greatest of all time
greats of greatest greats of all time. That's
what they're all screaming every you know, ridiculous,
hyperbolic, and then no one gets fired. And
then he gets put aside. And then they're
still great forever.
Yeah. If if you don't I mean, this
is my point about where we are with
this country.
There's nobody that looks at that and goes,
yeah. Clearly, that's completely honest.
We know they're playing their team, their their
game. We all know that. Both sides do
it. Everybody really does it in some ways
in their life. But what's funny is when
it comes to a head
in political seriousness and the and the conversation,
everyone acts like you're crazy for, like, it's
a broken dynamic.
You have these these ridiculous talk shows or
high level CNN, Fox, whatever. High level in
the sense of how they view it. And
you'll be talking about things that we that
we could proven years ago that they act
like are undefined or we don't know, not
even in the conversation.
These people are either some of the most
uninformed
high level journalists I've ever seen in their
minds again, or they just don't, you know,
I guess, or they're lying or they don't
even care to look for those things about
narrative control. But I just want us to
think about that. You know, the bigger point
of what, you know, all of them are
doing, holding the line is the right way
to frame it. Administration that, probably need to
go, but president Trump, fantastic.
He gave us,
gives us gives us,
a lot of support.
Good great job for president Trump. Isn't that
isn't that just interesting? You know? He gave
us give gives us gives us a lot
of support.
You know? Like a
strange. Right? Like like, oh, I can't I
might might offend him if I don't suggest
that he's still giving us support even though
that does not appear to be happening. What
happened to him was pretty embarrassing, guys. He
he got stood up like he was in
charge of everything, literally made himself a, like,
a Nazi SS coat for his job, which
didn't exist, and then
just got shoved to the side because he
was clearly a lunatic.
And and that was embarrassing. But, see, the
whole game is to act like it was
somehow the plan. You know? Maybe it was,
but that's that's gnome too. Right?
That's that's how you fail up in this
administration. Or Patriot,
you're swamp creatures. They're the medium Final question.
What do you say to Americans who worry
about ICE and Border Patrol
pro profiling or mistakenly or otherwise stopping Americans
and, you know, detaining them whether temporarily or
otherwise. Show me an instance where where that's
happening. There's plenty on Do you want to
love that? Now this is a very common
tactic. Now here, the question was, this main
point.
Because we know that's happened. Let's I mean,
look. This this is the the simple thing
that I posted just underneath Derek's post,
which is the story it's one of the
most prominent stories.
Reets, I forget. I mean, it's r e
t e s, e e s. Reets, I
think it was. He's The US veteran
who was working at a farm and got
arrested. He told him he was the US
citizen. They, I guess, didn't like that he
tried to say that. Well, arrested him, even
though they knew that, held him for three
days, refused to give him water. It's all
covered. He's been having multiple interviews. They've been
forced to acknowledge that.
They just acted like he like, the story
was that he was not following orders and
resisting. It's it's just not true, guys. Just
like they lied about Reddy and lied about
Prady and lied about good and lied about
every other story he could find, lied about
all of them, lied about shooting people, lied
about hitting cars, lied about stealing
things. Insane. And guess what? That ridiculous
story, ICE and what they're doing, is only
growing. We're just not watching it right now.
Or rather just, you know, the focus has
shifted. And that's this Gestapo force is extremely
powerful and growing in this country with the
surveillance apparatus of technocracy bolstering it around everything
with Israel involved there. That's all exploding.
Right? This guy can't even be honest about
the fact that this is actually happening. This
is one of many obvious and well documented
examples of Americans being illegally detained and abused
by ICE. I've also covered this explicitly,
this one topic. DHS lies about detaining and
deporting US citizens.
This was called out in the middle of
congress. They were known, embarrassingly tried to deny
that, and you could show video after video,
document after document, court case after court case
where it keeps happening. Now do you really
think that he doesn't know that? If he
doesn't, that's insane. It means they live in
their own little broken bubble and pretend that
they're not actually doing what they're doing, which
is a whole another story when you think
about it. I genuinely think that this person
is just
that's what you're supposed to say. And so
you go, oh, yeah? Which one? And then
what happens? Right? What if I was there
and I said, okay. Reeds.
What is he gonna say?
Who from what stores? Where from? I don't
believe it. You really think he's gonna go,
oh, okay. You're right. So the point is
to hope you don't have an answer. So
he does what he does right here, which
I'll I'll play now. And he goes, you
know, oh, so you don't you don't know
what that's right. Because there are none. You
know? But there are. We know that.
So the question is, is he just trying
to play that tactic? Like, again, if you
had just responded by going, here are 17
names of people that it happened to. Here's
a document from the US government saying it
happened. He would not accept that. We all
know that.
Americans
and, you know, detaining them whether temporarily or
otherwise. Show me an instance where where that's
happened. There's plenty on social media. I'm not
saying what who who? There's plenty of individuals
on social media. I don't have names in
front of me. Exactly. There's current court Exactly,
he says. What does that mean?
Because he doesn't have a list of the
people who you've illegally detained sitting on his
hip. It exactly.
It's a it's a tactic.
Cases going on right now. In every single
court case. There's no Supreme Court everywhere.
Okay. Well, I guess he was trying to
mumble on the way out that those cases
are gonna be failed. No. They're not. You're
lost. You've lost them already. There's many cases
that have already been you they these people
just don't care, guys. Now the this this
person's no longer in the position of of
the in charge of the entire thing, but
he's still in a position of power.
That's concerning, guys. So support Derek and what
he's doing. He'll be there over the next
couple days doing some interviews. We might we
might be connecting on the show. Either way,
I just support his work.
So let's
continue. The the opening point here I wanted
to get into was this Israeli
biolab.
Now, this is an important story to briefly
go over again. Actually, the LA Times story
we're gonna reference, Los Angeles Times, does a
good job kind of overviewing the original parts
too. And it I'll include anything that I
think you need to know. Now, this is
what caught my eye is DropSight News reporting
this,
and then cites the article here. And it
says, an Israeli citizen was arrested in Las
Vegas,
Las Vegas after police found a cache of
weapons,
lab equipment, and more than a thousand samples
of unknown liquids at a home tied to
the widening biosecurity investigation
Los Angeles Times reports. Now this is all
what we already report reporting, including the fact
that the Chinese national was the one that
was involved. Now I'll give you my thoughts
on what this played out as and what
happened last time and what's happening right now.
So let's read the article.
So this this is coming from yesterday.
Now code enforcement officer Jesslyn Harper discovered a
clandestine biolab in Reedy, California. This is what
we reported on. Here's the actual article from
February 7, Israeli citizen charged with charged in
the Vegas the Las Vegas BioLab case as
Fort Detrick investigates sabotage, same time frame. Now
what's interesting is at this time,
I was trying to I was I was
interesting to find out whether there was connection
to the other conversations. And and I think
either after the show or in this show,
we realized that that was the case. And
it's connected to the same pre the story
we covered back in the about the the,
you know, the like, the stucco wall with,
like, the hose sticking out of the side
of the building. And the whole conversation was,
well, how does that possibly make sense? Because,
well, they had freezers, right, and coolers. Right?
So clearly, they had electricity. So somebody in
the city knew they were using electricity, but
we're supposed to be told it was a
a building nobody knew was being used with
a a hose sticking out of the side
of the building. I just it didn't there's
no way it was viable. It didn't believable.
It just didn't line up for me. Somebody
somewhere knew that that building was doing what
it was doing or doing something off,
you know, off the,
not off the grid, but out outside the
law, if you will.
And that's not what happened. It just kinda
got dropped, and the China Chinese guy? Okay.
And then we have the others this other
story that came up, and it turns out
they're interconnected. And it turns out the connection,
guys, is that Ori Solomon owns the buildings.
So So at this point, you have to
stand back and go, okay. Is it possible
these Chinese individuals were using his buildings and
they just use two separate building different as
possible? Yeah.
But it's also just as possible that this
is an organ whatever this all is, is
being facilitated by this Israeli man. Now does
that mean it's tied to the Israeli government?
No. Not necessarily. And we went over last
time the, like, the the, you know, the
potential connections and so on. The the point
for me is just the interesting way this
story was covered
and why and how this is incredibly important,
and yet it just seems to have gotten
dropped when the deeper story became noticed.
Now it says the facility was allegedly operated
by a Chinese national involved in smuggling counterfeit
COVID tests. Also interesting time and connection. Right?
That this was during that time frame where
fake COVID tests and and some of them
were fake pregnancy tests were being sold to
Americans.
So and you the the time frame was
very much just the, you know, the the
China, the Wuhan. You know, Trump basically directed
everyone to aim everything at China, despite the
evidence, by the way.
And the reality of the evidence clearly suggests
if it was
what he was saying, then they're clearly both
involved. But there's more to the story. I'm
not gonna go down in that discussion today.
We covered it all extensively. In fact, we
were some of the earliest people talking about
that potential despite the fact that I think
the evidence went a very different direction. And
that's funny why you have the government and
a lot of the mainstream alternatives swinging back
around, going, BioLab, and that's the way they
created the lab. And Wuhan,
way after the fact when that was where
we're doing the day that started.
Worth going back through all that, by the
way, the whole story. But to this point,
the Chinese national who was involved with the
actual building, not the ownership, but the actual
operation, so we're told,
was involved with the COVID overlap.
So this could be China doing something. It
could be random Chinese people doing this for
their own interests. It could be this Israeli
running it all. And it also could be,
just like the same point you can consider
of China, it could be Israeli government operating
this and manipulating through this same channel. So
let's go through this and you can consider
that for yourself.
The case of a lifetime started with a
putrid smell and a green garden hose sticking
out of the side of a supposedly vacant
warehouse in California farm country.
Labels such as malaria, COVID nineteen, and HIV,
labels that read blood and Ebola. Now remember
this original story,
last I checked, no one has ever gotten
definitive information about what they actually had. There
was s there was, you know, statements about
what they said and then going to the
lab. And last time I checked into it,
there was nothing on it. Not that I
can find right now.
The idea being, why would we not find
out what that was?
Seems pretty weird, doesn't it?
Then went on, the her discovery blew open
an elaborate criminal case with ties to California,
Las Vegas,
and China.
In the sense of the people, the investigation
in Reedley found that the lab was part
of an elaborate scheme to import COVID tests
from China and pass them off as American
made.
But there are some who fear the operation
was much more complex than that. A congressional
committee uncovered payments topping $1,000,000
made to an operator of a Reedley business
from banks in the People's Republic Of China.
Now understand, what we're talking about is banks
that exist in that country, not not necessarily
the government. The the way that people in
this country, especially partisans, love to frame things
like that in Russia and China is that
there's no world in which anything that exists
there cannot be controlled by the government. And
that's not an unfair consideration,
especially when the same kind of points should
be made about where we live, but that's
not usually how that goes. But just like
where we live, that's not the case ubiquitously,
and so it's the same thing there. But
so consider that all we're really talking about
is money from a bank that came from
China. So if you were hypothetically wanting to
create an operation and make it not look
like it was you, which is what every
intelligence anywhere would do, whether CIA or, you
know, MI six or Assad, then you would
and and China is an easy little hanging
fruit when it comes to COVID nineteen conversation.
But it could be China too. That's just
as much a consideration in this conversation, especially
since the two we know, the nationalities were
Chinese and Israeli, and we're getting to that
next. The defendant in the case, Jaya, I
think it's you're Bai Zhu,
a Chinese national, has not been charged with
running an illicit pile lab.
How is that possible?
How can you have this go so you
it's not like there wasn't a lab. That's
under everybody can see that. They took the
materials. Now even if you wanna claim they
just had a bunch of random things labeled
like that,
You've told us that the building was not
allowed to be used or supposed to be
unoccupied. So how was this guy not charged
with a crime? The vials discovered in the
Ridley were never tested.
Now, again, this is what I just that's
what she's claiming. I found the same. I
find that hard to believe.
I just I don't know how I mean,
my point, that's why I said it earlier,
I think they very much did test these
things and were just not being told.
Seems kinda strange. Like, just the sense that
you would argue with an if they were
never tested, how would in what world does
that make sense? So you're telling me you
guys scooped up a bunch of potential Ebola
and COVID and whatever else you claim is
there, and you just didn't do anything? You
didn't test it? You just did what? Put
it in a bag? Put it in a
count? Put it in a in a cabinet?
Threw it in the garbage? None of that
makes any sense whatsoever if for the potential
that it could be a very dangerous thing
if you believe that's possible.
But, yeah, they never tested
it. Think that either they told us that
or they didn't because there was actually nothing
to it was a you know, something like
that. Very strange.
But for some officials, the questions left unanswered
from the lab in Reedley, then Nevada,
two separate locations, underscores America's vulnerability
to unregulated
biohazards that could be used by bad actors
for criminal behavior and even terrorism.
Now this because this one, this was the
one from Las Vegas.
Remember this and this connect to the same
person we're about to get to.
Now it says and again, before we move
past that, you know, think about this, where
we're being screened at by our own government
left and right about all of this, about
domestic terrorism, about bioterrorism,
and and then yet we have this example,
and then just nothing happens. No hype about
it. No concern. No testing.
I don't buy it.
Quote, at worst, this investigation revealed significant gaps
in our nation's defenses
and pathogen related regulations that present a grave
national security risk that could be exploited in
the future. Now there is an op opening
for consideration
that the entire thing was just a setup
narrative to point back to when some kind
of thing gets rolled out.
You know? And and whether you that's not
to say we're con saying that as an
absolute. And, again, if you're out there considering
or thinking that it's crazy conspiracy theory to
consider that a government might conduct some kind
of an operation to manipulate, then you're then
you just do not simply know how the
world works and are not paying attention over
the last thirty seconds, it seems, let alone
last year. But understand that it's possible
that this could be a scenario that's used,
even if it was a real situation, to
later, you know, argue that there was some
kind of stemming point for something different.
The center of disease or the CDC
determined that at least 20 potential infectious bacterial
and viral agents,
including
dengue, hepatitis b, c, herpes, simplex
virus,
herpes simplex virus, rubella virus, and SARS coronavirus
were present in the warehouse
according to a Fresno County Department of Public
Health application
for an abatement warrant filed in the in
civil court. Okay. Wait a minute. We're being
told that no testing was done, and yet
the CDC
claims they determined what these things were. Okay.
Well, there's an obvious gap in the story.
And it says, and that's where the story
of what was found in Reedley Warehouse could
have ended, except
the longer Zhu sat in jail
but not but never charged with a legal
bio lab, the bigger the case became. Now
this is what I find interesting, and this
is why I always point out things about,
like, the local investigation that seemed to
be problematic for the larger kind of engineered
things.
All that's all with, for example, Derek's investigation
around the Utah sexual,
the Utah investigation around sexual abuse of children
with the ritualistic sexual abuse. That was a
major case before by the Utah sheriff's department
with un
undeniable evidence.
And and and the point was that's something
that they the the federal side, which is
ultimately what they did it didn't really go
anywhere,
always steps on. And it happened because the
local sheriff's department saw the evidence. Or, for
example, the case in Oregon about the Saudi
Arabia conversation, which we've shared many
times. The local Oregon sheriff's department was like,
look. Saudi Arabian people are coming in the
state,
raping women, stealing, and leaving and being flown
back to Saudi Arabia under diplomatic cover. I've
covered this many times. Happens to Israel all
the time. We just talked about Tom, what
was his name?
Yeah. Onder I forget now. Something Onderovic or
something. He was an Israeli,
tagged the government, flew in,
with the intention to
abuse a child sexually. That was the meeting
he set up, and then he got caught
on a sting, and they let him fly
home. He's never been charged.
Anyway, the point was the Saudi Arabia thing
was very it was being very widely discussed.
And it was it's not like it was
necessarily being, like, allowed and organized, but because
they're Saudi Arabian and because they're an ally
of the United States government and clearly care
more about that than your life or your
livelihood, They just let them fly home, and
it still happens.
So considering that,
back to the point, it says that's where
the story of what was found in Reedley
Warehouse could have ended,
except it got bigger when I argue the
local investigation element started to uncover what Ari
Solomon had in his
home. Now it was dark on January 31
when law enforcement descended on a five bedroom
tract home in in Northeast Las Vegas
that Zhu had listed as collateral for bail
and called some 400 times in the past
year. Now that's interesting to me. That's one
of the points that stands out is is
showing that there's more collaboration than maybe Zhu
being used. Because one of my thoughts is
simply that this is as we'll get into,
he's a criminal, this guy. Apparently, he's a
millionaire, but he's a criminal. Was in Canada,
Zhu, the Chinese
national, and then moved to Reedley and was
there ever since. And I'm wondering if this
is sort of an operation where this person
was compromised and then brought in to be
just play this role. Right? It's worth thinking
about.
But if that's not the case, then it
might it's more likely that we see them
working together. And then the fact that he
was calling it about some 400 times seems
like there's something weird going on there. And
then the fact that we're talking about the
listed as collateral point means that there's more
it's not just something he's renting. Right? Now
it says by the end oh, wait. No.
Go on. It
says they rolled into
the 900 Block Of Sugar Springs Drive in
armored vehicles operating drones and a robot dog.
Yeah. Welcome to the technocratic world. By the
end, police had arrested a man named Ori
Solomun.
So they went into the location based on
the the Chinese national and the information they
had, and they ultimately arrested Ori Solomahn, a
55 year old Israeli citizen who author or
authorities say managed the home,
and another that was also searched.
While nothing was found in the second home,
the search on Sugar Springs Drive proved fruitful,
police said at the news conference. Now investigators
found, as we reported last time, a cache
of weapons and arrested him on federal weapons
charges, saying he was barred from having them
due to he was on a immigration a
non immigration visa, which I find interestingly relevant
to the conversation today.
And they and they also accused him of
improperly disposing of hazardous waste.
Okay. But wait a minute here. So now
we're talking about the fact that in this
home, not the lab, the home, this man
had not just waste as we'll get to,
but other dangerous things that were in the
lab. So there's I don't think there's any
logical way you can disconnect him from what
was going on there. I think that clearly
shows that. An attorney representing Solomon did not
respond for comment. Video for, from news outlets
at the scene also showed investigators
spending a great deal of time in the
home's garage
where they donned respirators,
protected clothing, and removed lab equipment.
K. You see, it's very clear. And more
than a thousand samples of unknown liquid.
So this is the same thing. K? This
is this is the this is important, I
think, to understand that both this person is
the central tie.
The substances were sent to an FBI lab
in Maryland for testing, but as far as
I can tell again,
we never get to find out. The materials
according to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department sheriff
Kevin Mc Mc,
McMahill
said were consistent with what was found at
Reedley.
So what does that mean? Consistent? But you're
telling we never get to find out what
that was? What's consistent about it? That they're
liquid or that they're dangerous Ebola?
I guess we'll have to guess.
Steve's attorney said that they weren't involved in
any kind of BioLab, which, you know, I'd
have said those things tend to be well,
that's what he would say, of course, if
he was.
But it says, what went on in that
residence we are unaware of?
Weird.
But Capozzi did not return an email and
phone call seeking additional comment from the times,
Capozzi being the Jew's attorney. Now it says
nearly a month I don't know. So what
he was that's that's he the Jew's attorney
saying, we are not aware of whatever was
going on inside of that residence. Now that's
important because this this overlap becomes interesting where
what we're hearing is that, essentially, it's he,
you know, put it for collateral, called it.
But whether or not he was aware of
the larger point of what was actually happening,
it it matters, I think. Nearly a month
after the search, it is still not clear
what was inside
the Las Vegas home and what the plan
was for the materials.
I mean, we've seen these things. They just
look at these pictures. This is the same
stuff that you had all the screen that
that rightly concerned, but high hyper ball is
sort of framing from a lot of the,
you know, Libs of TikTok and all the
mainstream
alternative
magas of you know, fake MAGA patriots
who were all up in arms, rightly so,
because it was a crazy story. But then
funny enough, how they stopped talking about it
when they got to this point. Sort of
like the man from Azerbaijan who was actually
you know, they claimed was a Palestinian who's
gonna say, you're gonna know my name when
I come through the border. And then it
turned out he was actually somebody that was
tied to Mossad, and then that was easily
proven, and then he just stopped talking about
it. I've talked about that many times. I
mean, guys, there's no misunderstanding
what that is. Now it says, we recognize
that the public is seeking clarity.
What were they testing for?
What possibilities are being considered? Christopher Del Zotto,
special agent in charge of the FBI Las
Vegas, said during a February news conference.
In cases like this, our process relies on
being slow and methodical.
And
okay. I mean, think about this. So how
many months did it possibly take to end
up revealing what this was?
Capozzi, zoo's attorney, told reporters outside of federal
courtroom in 2023 at the it's 2023. The
allegation in the congressional report that his client
isn't an agent of the Chinese government is
inaccurate, but, again, probably what they would say
if that was the case. That's the furthest
thing from the truth. He wrote, he's applied
for asylum here in The United States because
of the Chinese government, which is true, but,
you know, it could easily just be a
cover. But it's
another point in the other direction that ultimately
is trying to apply for asylum to get
away from the bad Chinese government is how
it's being framed.
Sue then moved to Canada and started doing
business there,
focusing on the cattle industry.
In 2016,
one of his businesses was ordered by a
Canadian court to pay $330,000,000
for allegedly stealing paddle related technology from a
US based company.
That's the Sue guy. It is not clear
whether the business ever paid the judgment.
Okay. That seems a bit odd, isn't it?
When you be able to find documents to
maybe,
most likely.
But there's, you know, situations in which it
could be sealed, but it just that seems
very strange to me. So not only is
he a multimillionaire
who lived in Canada,
who got caught stealing cattle related US technology
for rather from a US based company,
and then didn't seem to have ever flushed
out what actually happened there, he was ordered
to serve six months in jail after being
found in contempt of court, a conviction that
he appealed. But court records didn't make clear
whether he served any time. Now the House
Select Committee reports say that Jew fled Canada
and landed in California.
Went. Right? Went to Reedley.
That's where the story continued.
So the question becomes with this background, which
and let me read this last part, actually.
It says by 2020,
federal prosecutors said Zhu and his partner, Wang,
were operating two companies,
Universal Meditech Inc and Prestige Biotech Inc, which
we've heard those names, best Prestige,
that sold COVID nineteen, pregnancy, and other types
of test kits. Remember all the money that
Trump's administration was just dumping and Biden, but
he started that? We're just dumping the money
into the hands of people for COVID test
and for respirators and small company.
I mean,
I think I I think the report actually
showed that the vast majority of that through
the CARES Act, wildly
broken. Everybody was abusing them. Honestly, I think
it was a way to dump money in
the hands of their friends. But a lot
of people went through and did it the
same and enriched themselves faking things like this
because they weren't checking anything.
Now it says Zhu and Wang imported hundreds
of thousands of COVID nineteen test kits from
a Chinese company that they controlled
and falsely represented to customers that the test
kits were made in The United States
according to their indictment.
They illegally imported the COVID test kits disguised
as pregnancy tests, which they had been approved
to import.
Approved to import. Okay. So realize we're talking
about a a a Chinese nationals
who are
I mean, who the one of them was
a multimillionaire
who got caught stealing US technology from a
US company,
somehow still has
enough money to start two new companies,
gets sent to, goes to, really California,
and then starts all of this.
And, again, this the common thread over all
of these two points was the Horry Solomon
Israeli who owned the building.
So what I just think is interesting is
that there's so many elements of this. Like
I said, even the the energy from the
building. Like, there's so many obvious elements that
shows you whether it's the US government, Israeli
government, or whatever else, that something was aware
of this. Some element of authority was allowing
and essentially covering this up. That's what I
believe because nothing's happened.
And it ties back to COVID, ties back
to the same kind of fraud that we
were dealing with, and that overall,
that nobody's done anything about these people despite
them being caught with fraud, starting fake companies.
And the way it started seems to suggest
they could have been sort of compromised,
or zoo, at the very least. And the
full scope of what is inside the Reedley
lab will probably never be known, they write.
How why? Why does that make sense? Harper,
the code enforcement officer, said the CDC
simply declined
to test any of the material
in the warehouse
because the vials were, quote, not directly labeled
as select agent.
Okay. So you have a possible anthrax, Ebola
just kinda resting on the shelf that nobody
can identify because no one's labeled it and
we don't know? Does Does that make sense
to anybody? Does it sound like I mean,
I gotta admit, maybe it sounds like the
kind of incompetence we're dealing with today, but
the reality is we're not supposed to believe
that they would just take an unknown substance
and just keep it somewhere for no reason
and never find out what it was. Either
they're lying about testing it, don't want us
to know what it is, or there's another
or that none of this is even happening
the way they're claiming.
Am I crazy? I just this is insane
to me that this is even something that
they would claim. Just decline to test it
because no one that nobody labeled it?
So, yeah, just throw that possibly bowl in
the trash because we're not sure.
Or I guess you could say they incinerated
it, but there's still a level of concern.
If you don't know what it is, I
mean, are are you just suggesting that you
just went, like, full BSL four and everything
just to burn a cup of substances you're
not sure about? I guess maybe that would
be the only one that would make somewhat
sense, but the fact that why wouldn't they
just tell you that? You know, there's something
off about this. In 2024,
a civil lawsuit filed against the city of
Reedley, Xu played down the situation,
saying that the warehouse was only being used
for storage while his company waited for a
new facility in Fresno.
So, again, this company, right, so he's built
somehow still very rich and influential or at
least making companies even though we've got had
to pay out 3 to $30,000,000,
if that even happened, by the way.
And what he's saying here is he said
I was just using that for storage. Now
consider that being possible. What if this person
is ultimately being used and wasn't even aware
of what they were using the location for,
and he was using it for storage for
these companies he was doing, but he was
also involved with corrupt illegal companies
and, you know, criminal activity. So maybe, you
know, it all it seems like that either
one of those could make sense, where this
is a guy who was simply being used
for the obvious point of his nationality in
the cover in the sense if it were
to be caught, it's obvious where they would
aim this,
or he was involved. And this is him
lying about that.
It isn't known how many biolabs are operating
in The United States because there's no monitoring
system in place,
said Sam Howwell,
an associate fellow with the technology and national
security program at the Center for a New
American Security.
So you wanna wanna walk that through?
I mean, let's make sense of that, that
there's no system in place to monitor for
biolabs
after everything we've been through, after the fact
that despite what we know, they're still doing
gain of function. Let's not forget. In fact,
they should've grabbed that.
That's actually really important for this conversation.
Oh, that's the wrong one.
I'm not probably I don't even know what
it's called now. Remember off the top of
my head.
Because the point is
Donald Trump
and his administration
have become the leaders in the world, they
claim, of the safe or the, you know,
the good versions of can to function. That's
the truth.
For those that probably don't wanna believe that,
you're probably denied if I don't grab the
article, but let me just see if I
can find it real quick. We we we
went and the point was just like with
the lie of the COVID shots and the
lie of I mean, everything they seem to
do. We're stopping the COVID and accept you're
not. We'll get to that in a second
where you're quite literally still recommending them right
now, where you're quite literally still making them
for 2026 right now from Trump's administration.
It's insane, guys.
The point, though,
let's see. No. That's an old one. Is
that Donald Trump's administration claimed they were stopping
gain of function, but when he read the
documentation, it said very clearly that we were
going we're gonna stop all the dangerous ones,
but be the world's leader in the ones
that aren't dangerous. But that that's that's a
game.
Gain of function is the problem, not the
certain picked ones they like.
That's frustrating. In the chat, if you guys
remember what or what show that was. I
can't seem to remember. I don't think it
was in 2025. I think it was maybe
it was.
Anyway, I'll try if you guys remember what
it was, put it in the chat, and
I'll include it in the show notes.
That's frustrating. What was that show called? Anyway,
back to the article.
So
we don't have any way to monitor. Well,
obviously, what we're talking about here would be,
like, unknown secret violence. But my point is
that there's plenty of these things that operate,
and no one's even trying to monitor them.
How does that make sense?
I don't know. A day after the Las
Vegas raid in January, a case the case
once again returned to Central California,
where the FBI executed a search warrant on
the warehouse, Reedley City manager Nicole Zayiba said
during the news conference in February.
Zayiba
assured the public that all biological materials were
removed from the site years ago,
and only pallets of COVID nineteen tests, pregnancy
tests, and boxes of paperwork remain. Ultimately, Zieba
said officials in Reedley were, quote, not surprised
there was a Vegas connection.
Really?
For two years, Harper had warned federal agents
that there could be additional materials in the
home.
In Las Vegas, based on details
she learned during the investigation in Reedley,
I couldn't get them to move on it,
she said.
The attitude really has been, well, we caught
the guy. We did our part.
So do you sense the same thing I
do with this entire thing?
Come to your conclusions about it. But with
everything we just saw and even what she
just said right there, we couldn't She's literally
going, guys, there's still dangerous things in there.
And they go, we got them.
It's it's a it feels very October 7
of the Israeli government going, stop telling us
about the drills, or we're gonna put you
in jail. Don't point at that anymore. Right?
I I just think that's wild.
So we'll we'll keep an eye on this
if anything continues to develop.
Oh, here. Maybe she, grabbed the right article.
Let's see.
Oops. Hold on. I wasn't.
Let's see.
Oh, this is the one because I want
you guys to check this
out. Oh, no.
That's just the one. Oh, you're just posting
it on the chat for them. I see
it. Thank you for that. Yeah. So if
if if you if you happen to find
the one in the chat, guys, about the
one I'm talking about, the,
Donald Trump's administration essentially becoming the world the
leaders in gaining function, and when they kind
of lied about that, I'd like to talk
about that too.
Make sure we weren't make sure we're done
right. Yeah. Okay. So and I'll just to
refresh as well, I'll include this, which is
what was posted from Las, Vegas locally. The
federal judge in Nevada has ordered the release
of Ari Solomon, the property manager connected to
the suspected Las Vegas Biolab, which is not
suspected, right, especially now.
But as far as I can tell, these
people have never actually gotten charged.
I just find that to be quite insane,
especially with where we are in the world
right now. With all the concern of people
growing awareness of what Israel is doing around
the world. But it shouldn't just be Israel.
I'm just as concerned about this stuff if
it's a foreign anything doing, like, something like
this in the country concerns me. But it
obviously should matter more when we can see
what the Israeli government is telling you they're
capable of. Committing genocide,
commit you know, literally bombing schools and nurseries
and hospitals and conducting dangerous operations, bombing, booby
trapping electronics. It's not a secret. These aren't
even opinions. It's provable.
So that necessarily matters when you're talking about
whether one might be more dangerous
in the gut regard of, like, the government
involved. I'll also include the article from February
6. Federal judge ordered the release of and,
yeah, and this far as they left out,
I think that's where it is, of Horry
Solomon.
Solomon, who was originally from Israel, is in
the country on a non immigration visa.
Now let's talk about some partisan stuff that
I definitely think is worth acknowledging.
Just one is first, actually, before we get
into, like, the deflection points.
Oh, actually, I take that back. There's a
couple of points I'll include here, but I
wanna highlight the technocratic stuff, and then we're
gonna get into sort of the deflection points
here. But
first is this. Just, again, like I said,
there's some of these things I just wanna
include so you guys can see the updates
we've touched on.
I just think this is kinda wild that
we're talking about this this lie speaking of
the lies, for example, and the and the
ability for them to just wholesale lie to
you even though we can easily prove it.
The same reference I always I feel like
that was one of the earliest examples from
this admin. And, again, interestingly, starting with Stephen
Miller, where he just decided to go, we've
won that case seven to zero.
A major and highly documented Supreme Court case
where they very clearly lost zero to seven.
Now you may not agree with that. You
may not remember. The point is, as absolute
fact, that was the case. You could print
out the document. You could watch the judge
talk people going, what are they talking about?
Here's the actual ruling. Okay. The point is
he lied about that, and he knew he
lied about that. It was an exercise to
see if they and sure enough,
all of the ones you might expect, Nick
Sorder and Galloway came out and they said,
we won. Literally, I remember Nick's doing that.
Holy crap. Red red fly. Oh my god.
We won seven to zero.
And I doubt Nick even cared whether it
was true. Didn't know. But they lied. They
knowingly misled people and then they're just carried
to the conversation. And to this very day,
I could bring that up or at least
when it when it was still sort of
in the conversation
weeks later and people would still argue. No.
No. We won that. It's just it speaks
to where we actually are right now. Now
in this case, same kind of thing.
Right? And this is actually pretty it's interesting
how they're pushing this right now. I honestly
think it's more about drawing attention to the
fact that they're lying to go ignore everything
else maybe. But end of the day, let's
not forget,
Donald Trump and I I might even have
that article.
He he he stated this out loud. This
is why I think it's so interesting that
he does this.
Let's see if it pops up. How does
that keep happening?
Let's see. Well, here's just the same
discussion. The point was that Donald Trump said
very, very publicly,
had to do the Save Act, that unless
they pass this
or until they do, he will not sign
any bills.
And that's not popping up.
So and it's easy to check for yourself.
That's the reality. And so he said that
we won't we're not gonna sign anything until
you pass this.
And and as by the way, it even
says right here, you'll find out.
Then
when it came around to where they were
holding things up
and vote and and, like, for the TSA
example, for they they just made this big
case about Democrats don't fund it. I showed
you the voting roll for that vote about
funding TSA, and it was voted no by
almost I mean, I think by every Republican.
And they turn around and say, the Democrats
won't pay them. Now it's I'm not even
joking. If you have looked into this, what
they're doing is the same thing they do
every time. It's not unique to Republicans. Democrats
do it when it's their turn. They simply
they they put their foot down and say,
this is what we demand. And you have
to do that or we're not gonna do
this. And then they choose not to, which
is their prerogative. And then because they're the
one, Trump's administration, holding it up, waiting for
them to do what they want, they claim
it's their fault. It's like, you know, you're
stop hitting yourself with your brother kind of
a thing. You know, it's like you're the
one doing it to yourself. They're the ones
doing it to the other side, blaming them
for not letting it happen. Now this is
Fox News
asking
why isn't Trump why isn't Trump involved in
trying to get the government the end the
government shutdown. Here's how,
Johnson replies. Peter,
it seems as though Republicans and Democrats are
talking past one another right now. Mhmm. Is
the only person who could solve this the
president of The United States, and why isn't
he involved? Well, I think he is involved.
I mean, I know he had a group
of down the plan yesterday.
Well, that that's what's been reported. Okay. He
said he voted down the plan. He did.
That's what's been reported? Listen what he says.
He he brought some He said that in
the Oval Office that he was not pleased.
He said it in the Oval Office because
he did.
So you have to understand, like, this is
how crazy this is. Johnson is well aware
that we're not stupid. We can look at
it. They know. But the point is just
a lie. So then
screaming idiots online will carry the lie for
you and mix up the conversation or maybe
convince somebody that's the case.
What's that plan? Well, act actually, I have
his exact quote somewhere. I think he said
that,
to paraphrase him, I think he said he's
a little, skeptical or cynical that that, a
deal is gonna come together. What what we're
hearing, okay, on our chamber is that there's
discussions going on that Democrats are demanding to
break off parts of homeland and fund it,
separately. I I I'm
I found these articles to show you here.
It's important just so we can have it
on the record for those that, you know,
tend to not wanna hear it, and so
they'll ignore it until you show them. But
so this is what's important. Right? Because it's
funny to watch them sit there and deny
that. Right?
And
here,
Donald Trump refuses to sign other bills until
save act is passed. Now to be clear,
that's not just them mischaracterizing
his statements. That's what he said. This was
back on March 8. Right? So that's why
they just think we can't remember after after,
you know, two, three weeks. And here's another
one. Trump warns Republicans
no compromise on the DHS deal until
country destroying dams push through Save Act. So
you have to understand, it's very clear. He's
just saying, you do this or we're not
gonna let anything else happen. And then when
they don't do what they're told,
he turns around and goes, they're not letting
all these things happen. It's just it's just
ridiculously
juvenile.
And to be clear again, like I said,
it's not just him, but it's what they
he is doing right now. Now if so
if you're over the if you're one of
the people trying to pretend that this is
different, he's not like them, or he's not
like the guy he's the rebel flying the
deep state, then ask yourself why he's acting
the exact same way.
So inside a paper, president Trump, I am
going to sign an order instructing the secretary
of homeland security, Mark Wayne Mullen, to immediately
pay our TSA agents in order to address
this emergency situation
and to quickly stop the Democrat chaos at
the airport. Democrat chaos. Right? Because they're the
ones no. No. They they just have a
you know, look. I I don't think highly
of any of these people. I don't think
they have principles. But the the reality of
what they're claiming is
that that they don't agree with it, and
they did clearly don't. So you what you
want is for them to do something they
don't agree with. And and if they don't
do what they don't agree with, you're gonna
make sure everything else doesn't happen?
In what world is that anybody's fault but
Trump's?
It just is such a silly thing we
deal with, and these people are all such
childish people.
The Democrat chaos the airports. It's not an
easy thing to do, but I'm gonna do
it. Oh, because you're such a great person,
Trump. How how great of you to praise
yourself and how great you are? I think
about how weird that is.
And he says, it's by bipolar disorder right
here, he says. Doom. But so, you know,
he yeah. Basically, you know, this is so
funny. Radical left Democrats and their leader crying
Chuck Schumer have made
I don't know. I I just it's just
I'm just so tired of pretending like this
person is worthy of respect or any of
them for that matter. But the idea that
you're you know, why do you have to
speak like this? Like, it's not respectable or
cool or somehow, you know, bucking the system
to just be an idiot, to just be
ridiculously juvenile
and crying Chuck Schumer, you know, leak the
radical left Democrats. You're being hyperbolic. You're being
inaccurate. You're being you know, it's just not
respectable. People should make fun of anybody doing
that.
Now if you think that, that's fine. But,
clearly, he'll say things tomorrow that mean the
opposite. It's just this person is just screaming
what I think he thinks you want to
hear.
Judge in a mask says Trump demands unconstitutional
warrantless surveillance of all Americans. This is a
different post. Speaker Douse Johnson and senate majority
leader John Thune have been working to pass
a clean extension of FISA. Oh, he said
clean, Ryan. So you don't understand it's gonna
be a good MAGA version of the thing
we've all been fighting and hating this entire
time. Sure.
You're actually hearing that from some people. The
point is he wants to one standard for
himself, no spying, and another for everybody else,
spy like crazy. Just like just like the
fact that we'll get to in a second
where he just literally admitted that he did
mail in voting because he's president. He can,
so shut up. Yes. Literally just happened. The
so called reforms made to 07/2002
in the past are a joke. That's why
he wants a clean expansion.
They're just doing what they claimed was I
mean, I could bring it up again. I
just showed you how many times they were
saying, no. Seven zero two is bad for
everybody no matter what. Just like they said
about
mail and voting.
But then they do it.
You just you you either acknowledge how ridiculous
that is or you're just not an honest
person.
Interestingly, in regard to the idea of spying
and invasiveness,
this is what Reddit is doing along with
everybody else because this government, along with the
rest of them in the world, it seems,
are driving a world where we don't have
anonymity.
And just recognize this is happening under Trump's
administration or, you know, not necessarily indicative of
him personally or his government,
but I do believe that's what's driving this.
My point is this happens now under his
authority and same under Biden as anybody else
because this is what our government wants to
be the reality despite him stating different things.
Reddit CEO announced he is forcing a human
verification on the platform. He will force users
to verify through biometrics on a device, a
third party, or a government ID. How much
you wanna bet is gonna be something like
Authentix.
Now Ricardo points out Trump just gave 13
tech billionaires
the keys to American AI policy. But here's
a huge conflict of interest here.
I'm shocked. I'm shocked. The White House just
announced the president's Council of Advisors on Science
and Technology.
Sort of sounds very technocratic ishy, doesn't it?
We're talking about a a council of technological
science advisers to the president who are, you
know, some of the most influential and wealthy
people on the planet. It's almost like he
started to organize a very technocratic led government
with all the you know? I mean, I'm
obviously sort of laying it on thick, guys.
That's insanely obvious. Now you can argue it's
not what's happening.
But if you, like, if you just aside
from, like, the narrative or the conspiracy theory
you think it is, what's technocracy?
Right? It's it's a it's a it's a
structure of leaders or rather just a, like,
a governing structure led by the technical experts.
At least how it originally was framed, it's
actually become more of a eugenic sort of
supremacy mindset. But either way,
is that not what this is? Do we
not have these people? I mean, right now,
you've got people influential on Trump that are
not even in official positions, who are seemingly
influencing more than anybody else.
As he builds a new global order around
the board of peace and for Rose's a
new WHO. I mean, everything he's doing can't
be denied except unless you're somebody who has
pretended to call it out for all this
time and now pretend it's not there. But
here are the people he's talking about.
He goes, White House just announced this. Sounds
boring. Right? But wait till you understand what
it's about. Here's who it is. This is
insane to me. Think about what we were
all calling out before this. What Jones and
all the rest were all calling out, and
all the people he told you were gonna
go to jail, well, guess what? Some of
them are on this list. Who he now
will find a way to support in some
backward way, I would imagine. So the CEO
of Nvidia.
CEO of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg.
Mark Zuckerberg. Right.
As Matt points out, the day after a
jury convicts Meta of illegally endangering children, which
happened, I haven't reported on it, Trump puts
Mark Zuckerberg on a panel overseeing AI regulation.
I mean, even aside from that,
how does Mark Zuckerberg represent what the demic
rather the Republicans were telling you is, you
know, America first or or fighting for the
how is that not the representation of what
you all told us was the deep state?
It is. In case you're missing the point,
that's exactly I mean, almost everybody on this
list would have been somebody they would have
framed as the insider deep state. Yep. And
and many of, by the way, were very
much Democrat leader. Now it doesn't matter because
Trump's team,
well, executive chairman of Oracle,
because that's Larry Ellison.
I mean, guys,
how can any Republican with a straight face
support all this with what you guys have
been saying your entire time? I mean, that's
why I'm arguing, in case you've missed the
other shows, that the vast majority of conservatives
are very much uncomfortable with what's happening right
now. I've been saying that for months well
before people were I mean, I've gotten so
much pushback for that.
I think it's self evident right now. You
guys can decide. Marc Andreessen.
You know, the guy who literally proposed the
idea of the CEO run country and the
idea of how we need good oligarchs to
save us from the bad oligarchs and wrote
a manifesto called the techno optimist manifesto.
Totally no big deal. Right? Hashtag winning.
Sergey Brin, Google cofounder. I mean, my god.
I can go off an entire show. Whitney's
talked about him in so many I mean,
the idea of these people
being in these positions
and not being called out for exactly what
it is shows you how dangerous
the broken system of our, you know, media
apparatus around the system is. Not the honest
independent media, but the people who are corralling
you in to the problem.
Safra Katz, the Oracle CEO.
Free, Fred
was it Ursam, cofounder of Coinbase.
Don't forget that the previous,
CTO of Coinbase is the person who's aggressively
driving the whole network state agenda and which
is the same conversation.
The reimagining of our society, and that's what
they're talking about when you hear freedom cities,
when you hear smart cities, when you hear
fifteen minute cities. It's all the same conversation.
CEO of Orca Oclo, the nuclear startup that
Sam Altman chaired until last year. No big
deal. CEO of Commonwealth Fusion Systems backed by
NVIDIA and Google. All the good guys. David
freed Freidberg, venture capitalist part of the Sachs
network.
The Sachs network. Cool.
Google former quantum computing lead, John Martinis.
I mean, are we gonna pretend that this
is the the group that you guys would
have picked for yourselves?
No.
Now here's what Trump wrote in this. President
the president's council of advisors on science and
technology,
the PCAST,
established by executive order because that's how things
work today. Right? Yeah. That's that's democracy, we're
told. Brings together the national foremost luminaries in
science and technology. Now to be clear, I
wouldn't argue that this would be something that
would go through you know, this is Donald
Trump picking his so different. That's probably not
the best point to make. But I still
argue the executive order and the way these
things operate. That's just how they govern today.
And I've been saying that for so long.
Obama, even before, this is governance by by
edict, by dictate. That's what they're doing.
But as I showed you, you know, in
the rest you can read, I'm very worried
about what that's developing into.
And and, you know, as we'll make a
point in a second, I think might even
be right here,
about Doge. I'll get to in a second.
You know, the point is simply just like
before. It's like, remember those of us that
were trying to call these things out before
it came to pass, when we might have
been able to stop it. Right? Because a
lot of people and and people who maybe
just didn't see it, who are honest. Right?
That's that happens too, who are just calling
it out while it's happening. That's good. Right?
But recognize
that there's so many opportunities for us to
sub at least try to stop some of
these things. Like, what I've like, I've been
screaming about when it comes to what I
think is happening. I what I think.
But as these things come to pass, I
see going, damn it. We had an opening
right there, and the same screening people online
stopped the honest people from actually
taking advantage of that opening.
So as the patriarch blonde pointed out, so
Trump just announced that he's pointing Mark Zuckerberg,
the same guy who censored, banned, and shut
down our Facebook accounts, the same guy that
more Republicans I've heard in my life, I
mean, have called this guy out than Democrats
than I've ever seen.
Dare to speak out on the jab election
fraud when they censored you.
Science and Technology Advisory Board. Right? This is
the man who decided that you weren't allowed
to talk about COVID nineteen, and Trump's the
man who started that program. But let's all
pretend like we're winning. What could possibly go
wrong? And as Five Times August rightly points
out, next up for the government promotion, Bill
Gates.
Probably. I mean, I well, I don't even
think he would need it. He's already very
influential, so is Larry Fink and all the
rest of the people who we're told would
be in jail right now, should he be
elected.
Now as we just talked about in the
last show, Pentagon's adopting Palantir as its
AI core US system. The US military's core
system is now going to be Palantir
AI. I've more I mean, remember when we
told you the same point back then?
Jones said it's a small thing Democrats hate.
You guys are freaking out. You're wrong.
And every single day, it becomes more obvious.
Hey. We we might have been able to
make a point and stop this from grapple,
and we still might. Right now, stand up.
Do something about it. My point is, if
we keep listening to people who are trying
to tell you the opposite of what's quite
literally happening in front of you, then we
will miss the boat.
Here's Mark Goodwin rightly pointing out,
on top of Palantir and everything else, by
the way, at o immigration OS, with the
ICE dynamic, with Gotham,
with ClearView. I mean, every single thing we're
talking about, the overlap with Paragon Solutions, which
is a spyware company from Israel that is,
like, one of the most criminal groups. I
mean, we've called out by everybody
for spying on journalists illegally. I mean, and
and this is all meshed together.
The dynamic of what they're doing in Israel
and that AI overlap. I mean, it's just
wild. On top of that, Anduril
and Palantir
did develop software to run Trump's Golden Dome
anti missile shield. Fantastic.
And as he writes here, and on and
it's from their on one of their articles,
an underreported revelation within the recent batch of
Epstein emails released by the Department of Justice
is that Epstein likely coinvested in Anduril
alongside Founders Fund via Peter Thiel. No big
deal. Yeah. These are the guys that are
literally in the tightest closest position to the
you know, to power.
But, yeah, but the Epstein files oh, what
is that again? We all forget about that?
Now, by the way, on a quick side
note,
we I mentioned this in our last, when
when Whitney just recently cohosted the daily wrap
up. But we Derek and I just had
a good meeting about the show we're gonna
be doing, which she announced on that show.
It'll be for it'll be under the banner
of Unlimited Hangout. And, essentially, what we're gonna
be doing at because, essentially, what we I
I, a lot of times, do on the
show already is that Derek and I will
be,
doing sort of a review of the in-depth
investigatory things they put out on Unlimited Hangout.
You know, I think twice a month is
the plan so far is that we'll basically
take one of these, you know, because the
you these articles are wildly in-depth, lots of
source material, and, you know, very long. And
so the point is to kind of do
a show where we can review the information,
break it down, have a conversation about it
between Derek and I. I think it'll be
fantastic, and I think it'll be good to,
you know, draw more attention to the writing
content that needs to be heard.
But on that again, back to the point
that and and the reason I said it
here is because Mark Goodwin is, part of
the Hangout, and he is, writing with Whitney
right now. But
how is this not alarming for people?
The all there's so many connections to almost
every single thing Republicans were calling out before
we got here. It should be. And and
again, my point is that it is. It's
just not being shown.
People are very unhappy with this.
As as evidenced by some of the most
large Republican influencers in the conversation suddenly calling
Trump out. But, yeah, I'm totally missing the
boat. Right? Andruil Palantir developing Golden Dome missile
shield software, sources.
Andro and Palantir Technologies are working together to
develop software for US president Donald Trump's Golden
Dome anti missile shield initiative. Now I my
opinion of the Iron Dome, I think, has
been flushed out and proven many times over.
It does have an effect. It does have
to but I think it's largely
it's it's like it's like Elon Musk hyping
one thing he thing he patched together before
it's even ready.
And then as if he never finished it.
It's where often I see that thing just
not functional based on what's happening. And, also,
I think it's used as a false flag
dynamic, and I've seen that. I've like, for
example, the one reported
on in, the Druze
location where Israel said it was, what was
it, Syria?
And, ultimately, the point was that you could
prove it. It was on video. Their own
Iron Dome shot a missile up and landed
on the field full of soccer players,
and they lied about it. Surprise, surprise. But
my point is in in Gaza, Israel, they've
done that plenty of times where they just
they claim something was fired, and they use
it to justify something. That's not to say
that there's not rockers being fired in some
cases. My point, though, is I feel like
a lot of that has been money laundering,
where this is money just dumped in there
where ultimately
thing well, not even just this, but a
lot of ways. The US government dumps money
in the hands of Israel who then builds
things and oftentimes sells them back to United
States. I mean, we're being scammed.
They know what's happening, but American people don't
often know it. In this case, I wonder
whether the Golden Dome is gonna be some
other kind of scam.
But even if it's not, what we're talking
about here is not just about defense, guys.
That is a surveillance dynamic. That is literally
the control grade that we're talking
about. It says the $1,885,000,000,000
Golden Dome missile defense project
aims to build a space based shield capable
of intercepting ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles, with
hundreds of companies vying for a role in
developing the shield.
$185,000,000,000.
Yeah. That whole idea of less spending and
smaller government, are we even pretending like that
was the case? He never even tried. We'll
talk about the DOGE thing in a second.
Andrew El and Palantir
have been interested in be being a part
of Golden Dome since the inception.
In in reality, I argue that that wasn't
interested in. I think that was the plan,
and they were involved from day one. Reuters
reported last year that the firms were working
with Elon Musk, SpaceX on various parts of
the project.
Anduril was also among companies that were awarded
half a dozen small Golden Dawn contracts in
November to build competing missile defense prototypes.
I Elyria Technologies, startups,
and startup Scale AI and software firm,
Swoop Technologies
are also working on the project. Now I
briefly looked into them. I haven't done deep
dives, but look into it. Let me know
if you find something interesting.
The price tag for the project has increased
by $10,000,000,000
to now 185,000,000,000
in a bid to accelerate the key's base
base capabilities.
More money.
I just don't understand why this is what
we support. Now Derek
rightly called this out in his article back
in 2025,
in April, Welcome to the Palantir World Order,
just to yet again demonstrate the value of
how these things are important to see before
they're already being done or before it's already
built around you. In this case, there's plenty
of good stuff in this article that he
called out before it's even I mean, some
of these things are still coming to pass.
Point in this one, SpaceX, Palantir, Golden Dome
over America.
Last week, Reuters reported that Elon Musk, SpaceX,
Palantir, and Anduril Industries were in the front
runners to win the contract to build Golden
Dawn. I argue that was always the case.
Trump has called for America to oh, one
quick point. Remember that we you got an
insight into this during the
incredible
incompetence of, like, Bondi and Nome. And Noam
came out where, you know, they the the
whole no bid contract dynamic, which was really
embarrassing for her. I think that's often what
this is anyway. They pretend they they give
you some kind of illusion of structure of,
like, the the meritocracy
that's clearly not being represented in this conversation,
never really has in our government.
But in this case, this was always gonna
go to them is my point. And there
was no, you know, trying to find the
best person for the position. It's about the
people who are inside connected to the right
things.
My opinion.
Trump has called for America to have a
dome defense system similar to that of the
Israeli's Iron Dome. Anduril was founded by Trump,
donor, Palmer Luckey, with funding from Palantir CEO,
Peter Thiel. Funny how that just it's just
a little incestuous circle that never seems to
go away. Sources speaking to Reuters claimed that
the three companies met with officials in Trump's
administration
and the Department of Defense in recent weeks,
in 2025 in April, to outline their plan
to build and launch between 400 and a
thousand satellites
to direct to detect missiles and track their
movements.
This would be combined with 200 attack satellites
with missiles and lasers to bring down enemy
missiles.
Now
certainly could be the only thing it's doing.
But on that note,
I think it's worth considering
what he just said there and the idea
of the satellites.
Right? So one,
to track their movements. So what we're gonna
pretend like that's only going to apply to
one it's gonna be to anything they want
it to apply to. So as I said,
this is going to be the control grid.
It's just like Israel's applied the same way.
I mean, it is a surveillance dynamic on
top of everything else. It will be combined
with 200 attack satellites.
So it's also, you know, not this ultimately
lasers to bring down missiles is that can
be applied to anything.
So I'm gonna play this clip really quickly
after I read the rest of this to
show you the the alarming
view of what this actually looks like in
case you haven't seen it. Despite these sources
telling Reuters that the SpaceX group is not
expected to be involved in the weaponization of
the satellites, These plans for a Golden Dome
would line up with SpaceX's Starship program, which
T Lab previously reported, poses a potential danger
to privacy for people around the world. And
here's the article for that.
In late twenty twenty four, Palantir, annual SpaceX,
and OpenAI, it's just these are just you
know, like I said in the beginning, it's
like they're playing it as if they're different
things, but the agenda and, honestly, probably even
just the it's just like, I when I
pointed out, like, OpenAI and Stargate, and I
wondered why it wasn't xAI and and Elon,
I think it's just the same. I think
they're involved in a larger agenda. Like, Rubio
and Trump, for example, clearly hate each other.
They pretend they don't, and they're working together
now. Same point.
Now it says the move was the latest
effort by the to replace an o the
old guard of the military industrial complex. Companies
like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing.
Here's the article.
You can't hide. Remember this one? Elon Musk
and SpaceX are helping the intelligence build the
world's largest spy satellite network. Now are we
gonna pretend that they're gonna put billions of
dollars into building what they literally called and
this this came from the, what was it?
That's that clip I was gonna play.
The the National Reconnaissance Office, which is above
most and very shadowy, even amongst the shadowy
groups that we know about. And they said,
what we are trying to what we're gonna
be doing.
He said,
they are part of a proliferating architecture to
go off and get us reasonably high resolution
imagery of the Earth at a high speed.
He goes, now you can't hide because you're
constantly being looked at.
That's that's what the quote was. Now building
like this with Elon, and then suddenly just
not anymore, and now we're gonna use a
different company. Like, that's not what's happening.
They're either all involved in this, and it's
both him and and I think the point
is in a lot of ways to keep
Elon Musk's name out of this because of
how bad that went when they started.
But this this is what we know is
already happening. So explain to me how this
can be there, but we're gonna be doing
something else.
This is for
2020.
And what you're seeing by those dots, if
you see the video, that that is satellite.
Those are Starlink satellites.
It's a it's a it's a representation of
it, but this is the reality right now.
2021,
2022,
2023.
Remember, leave it stopped before 2024.
Look at that.
Right? I mean, so this is 2024.
I mean, doesn't that just give you the
chill? That that makes me feel claustrophobic.
Everyone and we're talking I mean, it's surveillance,
the whole thing, guys. This is what they've
already done. And I think this is just
about to build out the the what Catherine's
telling you, that what they're talking about is
the control grid.
Include that for you. It's a good article
read.
So on top of that, in regard to
technocracy and kind of the control grid conversation,
Jason Bassler points out something else that Peter
Thiel is involved in. And I just I
have a hard time not connecting this with
two things in my mind with, like, a
almost like a Pokemon Go kind of an
overlap, but really more so the COVID nineteen
conversation. Where what did we tell you?
Lockdowns, we talked about well, this came from,
like, prisons or or, like, you know, for,
like, intelligent like, you know, dealing with terrorism,
stuff like that. And then we also talked
about the contact tracing, right, and the and
the different wearable technology. And every one of
these things tied back to something like cattle,
you
know, herding, controlling pop prison populations,
every single one of them, or CIA black
hood kind of dynamics at, like, Gong Pono.
That's what we're dealing with. That's not an
opinion. That was literally the where these tactics
originated from and how they were applied before
that.
This is something totally separate.
Peter Thiel just backed an AI system that
can herd 600,000
cows with one tap. It's called,
halter.
The system uses GPS collars
and behavioral science to train cows to obey
algorithmic sound cues while tracking their vitals, location,
stress, and compliance makes you wonder about the
push for smart wearables
or tech farming, or beta testing pot management.
Now, I'm not gonna I wasn't gonna get
into any of it today because I just
don't I almost feel like that's exactly what
they would want. But I'm sure you all
saw that weirdly cryptic nonsense that the White
House account was putting out yesterday.
All these weird things that almost made me
worried. I'm, like, being, you know, like, weird,
like,
shaky images and graphic things and, like, weird
high pitched sounds and stuff for, like, three
second videos.
I I mean, I kinda think they want
you to go, what are they doing? I
guess cue people are freaking about it.
Of course, they are because they'll read into
anything they want, whatever they want.
My thought, though, was something like that when
you're thinking about, like, the sound behavioral stuff.
Because this is real stuff.
And you wonder whether or not that like
like Catherine talked about or like James g
O'Donnell talks about in regard to neuroscience.
These things are real despite how, like, unaware
most people are or how visible they are
to most people, like, in our lives.
Just worth thinking about that we're dealing with
some kind of an overlap in this. But
even way, aside from that, just this technology
and having them invest in it, I just
feel like that's a little bit on the
nose.
Robert Barnes points out what David here said.
The Trump Pentagon official who ousted Anthropic
has a multimillion dollar stake in one of
its direct AI competitors,
according to disclosure's review. The corruption is off
the chain with these people, and I think
it's because of their incompetence. I don't think
they realize how obvious it is. They think,
well, that's what everybody else did. Look at
how corrupt Biden was. Yeah. I agree.
But they did it in ways that were
at least deniable in some cases.
I mean, badly. Right? And it's only the
further you go back, they seem to be
more and more well, I guess there's a
little bit of a little bit of a
schism with how ridiculous little Bush was. My
point though, as you go back further and
it was they they seemed like they at
least presented themselves as more respectable because that's
what they wanted to pretend to be in
my mind. In this case,
you see them just doing it. Like, Trump
just literally here, sell my buy my new
watch. Here's my Trump shoes. You know, he's,
like, just insane. It is wildly corrupt. The
conflict of interest is off the chain. So
this just I mean, what this is probably
just one additional point to all this. I
think it actually has more to do with
using it for their technology. But now you
have an example where they're they benefit from
that. Now I just read before I started,
I haven't gone into it, that ultimately, I
think they just won in their case where
they're the judge is ruling that the the
Trump administration is not allowed
to penalize Anthropic.
But who knows where that's gonna go? And,
again, that was only just a headline in
passing, so I haven't got into it. But
it says he also has stakes in other
AI and robotic companies with businesses
before the business before the Pentagon.
Just incredible.
And then, yeah, even Robert Barnes, who's, you
know I I'm not sure if he's still
a Trump supporter. He's been very critical of
a lot of what they're doing, but he
was before. I'm glad to see people starting
to call this stuff out. But he said
the level of corruption is utterly nuts.
It is. It's being allowed too, even by
the Democrats. Because guess what? No one's being
arrested.
This is creepy.
You probably saw this.
High Impact Flick shared this. This is this
awkward moment just happened at the White House.
And as David Icke says, what the f?
The world is utterly insane. Selling AI dystopia
very badly. So this is
actually, I'll just I'll just play this first
or read this first. It's funny framing.
Travis says, so the Trump administration went from
immigrants are taking our jobs to an immigrant
introducing a robot who is taking our jobs.
Got it.
It's just crazy. You know? And so what's
interesting too, don't forget that Trump recently came
out despite how little attention it got for
obvious reasons because seemingly every partisan on the
team sport player side is a shockingly dishonest
person. He He came out and literally said,
you know, we gotta ease up on that.
Some of these illegal immigrants are good, you
know, working good for here and there.
My point is I don't know whether what
I think at all. The idea that he
clearly said and drew drove this shockingly aggressive
anti immigrant rhetoric, which is still there, about
how every illegal immigrant has to be well,
technically, that is the case. They're legally here.
Right? So if we're even gonna apply the
law, what he just said challenges everything he
put forward, but so too does his glyphosate
thing, so too does his COVID shot thing,
so too does everything he's doing if you're
not lying to yourself.
But it's just crazy that you can even
say that and have them still support it.
But back to the point.
Watch this. Only a part of it, actually.
Ladies and gentlemen, the first lady of the
Melania
Trump.
Isn't that weird that we cut off the
English and
just
It's over
long overdue.
Keep in mind that these things exist.
That may be that weird for somebody somebody
here, but the point is that there's been
cases in the past,
like, Eli, for example, or Aponte, where they
where they kind of fake it till they
make it, where they put out, like, Sofia,
for example. That turned out to be a
complete lie. Even the original Tesla ones they
put out, it was revealed later that that
earlier one you saw, well, they were remote
controlling.
So it was more of a game they
were play they were you know? And they
but it's not like they're, you know, they're
kinda trying to, like, get buzz going, but
they lied about it. They made it seem
as if it was working.
And so in this case, consider that this
is not an autonomous AI dynamic and really
just them manipulating it. That's why I said
I do believe though that they do have
these things that can function, but just consider
that, you know, we're still being played some
way. But what's this about?
Right? I mean, isn't this the opposite of
everything that the Trump team was talking about?
You know, every dynamic of this. Like, it
every time we talk with them, which in
fact, it was not going to happen everywhere.
Like I've said, even the climate change stuff
from USAID, even the funding of, like, HIV
stuff in Africa, that stuff's still happening.
I don't know how many times I can
show people that, but that's just not an
honest conversation.
Thank you, first lady Melania Trump, for inviting
me to the White House.
It is an honor to be at fostering
the future together's global coalition inaugural meeting. On
figure three, a humanoid built in the United
States
inaugural meeting. Future Together's Global Coalition inaugural meeting.
The Global Coalition inaugural meeting. You know? I
mean, that's just be like,
not everything that involves other countries is, you
know, necessarily even nefarious. But I just think
it's important to highlight that every single thing
they're leaning into is being looked at right
now from a global dynamic. Everything.
I mean, even from an immigration perspective, for
crying out loud, but the whole thing is
everything is like that. That has to be
acknowledged as not what you're being told they're
actually doing.
Figure three, a humanoid built in The United
States Of America.
I am grateful to be part of this
historic movement to empower children with technology and
education. Yeah. That's what it's about. Right? To
empower children clearly.
That's I mean, it's just there's so many
disgusting things about the way they're applying this.
And, you know, these are the people that
are literally in real time covering up the
Epstein files. So let's pretend like that's what
they really wanna do. But you can watch
the rest of this. It's just creepy. And
this is
not what I think his space even remotely
supports.
But as,
this next post points out,
so, Catherine Austin Fitts don't forget, by the
way, she had there's a fake account out
there that's pretending to be her.
She says, Melania pitching robots for teachers. Bridget
pitching shredding the constitution to protect children. Nothing
about the prosecuting the Epstein pedophiles, though. And
here's what she says and trans translates it
for her, but she's talking about same the
same game they always play.
We believe in free speech, but certain things
are not allowed to be said, so you,
in other words, don't support free speech. Got
it. I do know that I am The
United States, a country that I love very
much.
And here, it we are the country of
free speech, but I think that liberty does
have some rules. We have to be free
but adapt to certain codes. So I believe
in these codes. Too many young people are
suffering
and Always use oh, but the children,
they don't care.
I mean, you what you're saying is that,
you know, yeah, we have to censor people's
words because bad things happen to children. It
it's illogical.
That's up for parents to handle. You know
what I mean? Like, it just this is
obviously
about what you think it is. Whether she
thinks it is or not, like, this will
be led because they you could argue she
has good intentions.
The government will abuse this like it always
does. They do not tell us. They but
they send signals, very strong signals,
from young people and teenagers.
So it's up to us to answer them.
Let's answer them altogether.
Oh, yes. Clearly. Because what they're she's saying,
we're picking up all the signals that are
the young kids are telling us. Please censor
everybody.
Just it's just sad. I mean, the thing
is they I don't I think they're very
aware that most people are seeing through this.
Aaron Day points out, if you thought NGOs
were corrupt, wait until you learn about the
Board of Peace, private army that is used
to bomb countries and pave the way for
technocracy that the Trump family and Witkoff families
personally profit from. And as I said, US
State Department transfers $1,250,000,000
of foreign aid of your money
for international disasters and peacekeeping,
but transfers it instead to Trump's board of
peace.
Now what's funny is somebody's gonna go, well,
we don't want international to well, guess what?
That's happening anyway. So if you pretend that
whether it's your ongoing supporting of the globalist
wars that are going on or any other
number of things that are still going through
USAID or NAD, and the same stuff is
happening like I've shown a thousand times. This
is just I've argued the, you know, the
note that you think he's changing from what
what the democrats did when ultimately that's not
even in a material sense happening. Like saying,
we're ending the COVID shots, and you guys
went, yay, and then they didn't do that
at all. But they said it out loud.
That's nice.
So
here is this post. Oh, this one was,
oh, yeah. That's right. I just I mixed
up on that. So here here is the
article. This is from Semaphore.
State Department sends $1,250,000,000
in foreign aid to the board of peace.
I thought that was funny. I thought about
it earlier, like, just the timing of this,
the in the board of peace.
You know what I mean? Like, while he's
literally conducting wars as the supposed peace president,
just kind of a funny but, you know,
like, Kaffiros and Fitz has pointed out in
the past about the names they're used. You
know, maybe nothing, which coincidence that he's board
of peace and he's continuing warfare.
The state department has drawn on funds for
international disasters and peacekeeping to transfer $1,250,000,000
of American taxpayer funds
to foreign a to Donald Trump's board of
peace. I mean, that might as well be
going in his pocket because he is the
forever chairman,
which means he could do whatever he wants
with this. They're they're in charge, guys. There's
not this is not a government. This is
not being voted for. He's just stealing money
as far as I can tell no matter
what he does with it. And it says
a and this is coming from a person
familiar with the fund. The US had previously
pledged to contribute $1,250,000,000
to the president's new international organization.
Why?
International organization, by the way, which Trump says
will rebuild Gaza.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The genocide that they're conducting
right now and the ethnic cleansing taking place
and the illegal actions conducted around all of
this while you're illegally bombing Iran and Lebanon
and everything else and, you know, ethnically cleansing
Syria at the same time, but you wanna
just take our money to be able to
build Gaza?
What does that even mean? Another smart city
that you guys have outlined for which is
exactly the opposite of what anybody supporting you
wants?
Sure sounds like winning.
Of the state department money, officials pulled 1,000,000,000
from international disaster resistance, $200,000,000
from peacekeeping operations, and 500 or $50,000,000
from international organizations and programs, the person familiar
with the fund said. Trump said he will
give 10,000,000,000
to the board in total.
Oh, good. Meaning 10 if you I think
if if you take that as his money,
then you're I don't think you're paying attention.
He sees this as his piggy bank, clearly.
Either if whether you agree with it or
not, 1,250,000,000.00
from your doubt from your pocket is enough,
more than enough, or too much. But 10,000,000,000?
Guys, it's gotta come from your it's it's
gonna be government funds. I believe that. Now
I'll include this as always. Just Gaza's board
of peace seeks to reimagine the international order
or how he went to the UN and
Davos and produced and per and and announced
those totally not globalist programs.
And the WHO is proposing for $2,000,000,000 of
your money,
which is, by the way, more than we
currently spend on the one he says is
paying too much, and the fake globalist resistance
that's ushering in the globalist plan and the
network state conversation, which I think all of
these things come together if you wanna take
time to go through those shows. It's worth
your time. Because all of this does amount
to what I think is happening. Under the
guise of freedom, technocrats are slow taking control
and other dynamics other dynamics as well. Now
in regard to the partisan side of this,
I mean, look. Everything we're talking about and
happened since this administration started is, you know,
a lot of it is just this shock
of how clear this is the opposite.
Again, like the same joke, like,
running on the idea of stopping the Democrats'
COVID nineteen actions and then on day one
starting a Stargate program.
You know what I mean? Like, that's it's
I was blown away by that. I was
like, oh my god. This is over. These
people are gonna riot, and then it just
didn't happen. Again, I argue even then, that
was when a moment where a lot of
them were, like, honest ones.
That's just a lie too far, especially for
the Maha side of it. But
some of them still stuck around. And I
think damn moment by moment and lie by
lie, that has continued to change.
So what we're I'm gonna point out here
is with the
floundering Iran war, what I believe they're losing.
At the very least, just in the long
haul, they're going to lose with the way
that their Iran is conducting the war. And
I think that they either didn't plan for
it the way that they thought it would
go or that Trump was essentially manipulated by
outside forces that wanted to use The US
like it always does to batter against the
elements they wanna fight for their benefit.
Or you could talk about everything I just
listed off, about the health side of it,
about the lies of funding, about more spending
and lower higher government,
AI surveillance,
lack of constitutional rights, killing Americans in the
streets, you know, a really unprecedented level where
we're at. And instead of focusing on any
of those things or even just continuing to
highlight the illegal war that we're in, you
get a lot of these screaming partisan accounts
who are just doing
anything to get you to look anywhere else.
Here's just a smattering of examples that I
think are important to see. Now this one
I thought was I mean, a lot of
these are the same kind of thing where
this count says, I'm still trying to process
what just happened.
The highest ranking US Intelligence Official just released
a smoking gun docs, proving that Obama has
underlings committed treasonous addition.
Meaning Trump is right about everything.
The news is fake and the deep state
is real.
Meaning that all of us is the conspiracy
theorists were right about the just like this
one stop shop, just every they all we're
all right. We're all winning and everything. It's
all coming down. It's just funny. Now some
of them, the the the fake they are
lying. There is fake news. They are lying
to us. Right? There is an unlikely power
structure. It's not what I'm saying. But it
says meaning the shadow war is real and
all the efforts over the ten years were
part of a larp. Yeah. It's a little
quick lump. Ten years of the just because
of this one statement, all of it was
there. You know, it's just it's it's about
trying to make you think.
Don't listen to all the stuff. Don't forget
about Stargate. Forget about the glyphosate. Forget about
the wars. Forget about bigger spending. All the
lies. It's all it's all gonna work out
because this.
That's what it's supposed to make you feel
like. Right?
And if you don't know actually, let's let
me play the clip really quickly before I
even read what I was gonna say. Here's
the the start of it. Alert the director
of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell
report today that shows a conspiracy
by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his
intel agencies
to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump. Bramer's the
electorate
and undermine the legitimacy of an election.
There is irrefutable evidence that detail Irrefutable. How
president Obama and his national security team directed
the creation
of an intelligence community assessment
that they knew was false. That's correct. They
knew it would promote this contrived narrative that
Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election
to help president Trump win, selling it to
the American people as though it were true.
Yeah. It's a lie. The Russiagate scam was
a massive crime.
20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns
out that the Obama administration
doctored the intelligence
to make it look like Putin and Trump
stole the election.
A month after Trump beat him Okay. Here
it goes. You know? Boom. Boom. Boom. Just
stuff that, you know, some of which I
think is provable.
Yeah. Obama's a criminal, guys. More criminal. And
he also very, very lied about this. Okay.
Yeah. Do we know this? Now what's funny
about this, you might not you might have
already realized
was that's not a bombshell report. That's not
a breaking news. I'm still reeling from what
I just experienced kind of a post.
That's a post from 2025.
And I said, you're still trying to process
the video that's from 2025?
Interesting. Or are you just posting this old
video as an as as new to
desperately distract Waffling Maga from the reality that
Trump lied to them since this bombshell led
to zero action.
I think that's quite clear.
And it's funny. Some of these people down
here are like, you're funny. MAGA is stronger
than ever. Just like
evidence clearly by this selling of an old
failure as a new one. Clearly.
So my point in these accounts, guys, is
these are these are you know, some of
them are large. I think this one was
a smaller one.
But my point is this is the kind
of ongoing stuff. Some of these I'll show
you, like, million follower accounts like Wall Street
Apes. But the effort here, whether it's about
just this person trying to get in get
in on the game, right, to become the
next next sure, you know, whatever Eric Daugherty
or whatever, just to become the next person
who could just put a red light in
holy crap next to whatever Trump says and
earn a million dollars on this platform. Right?
But or
they're just trying to sell you away from
the reality. But either way, my point is,
you're this these these are people, in my
opinion, who are aware of what's going on.
Right? They're watching because they are Trump supporters.
And so you're gonna tell me that these
people aren't aware? Like, just to make it
clear, I've seen people like Wall Street Apes
and many of them literally seen,
Nick Sorder share this exact video
months after it came out going, a bombshell.
It's all coming down. Okay. Look. Again, he
should be in jail. These people are criminals.
Obama.
But how long until when nothing is happening
until we go, yeah. So
they didn't they're they're either they don't care
or they lied to us. I mean, what
else conclude what can you what other conclusion
can you come to?
And then you get them reposting it. Like
like I keep seeing them share that Kash
Patel video saying Pelosi did this, and it's
all coming down, which is from, like, the
beginning of the administration.
And they keep going, oh, I can't believe
it. It's coming down. And nothing keeps happening.
And I agree Pelosi should also go to
jail. I'm not joking about that. I genuinely
think these people are criminals. My point is
that they're not doing anything, and that should
awaken honest conservatives
and recognize the account that are constantly trying
to gaslight you into thinking that these same
old videos are now happening. It's all coming
down to get you to stop looking at
the failures.
This person, Real Roberts, says, here it is.
Secretary of War Pete,
Hegseth confirms the world's number one sponsor of
terror is Obama. And that was a little
bit different. This is more relevant to the
Iran conversation, but same kind of idea. Is
that you know what? Okay. So now Hegseth
confirms that he's a terrorist? Okay. Why wouldn't
he be in jail if that's the case?
Here's what he said.
Many of the Iranian military factories
and bases that we're systematically destroying were paid
for
by the pallets of American cash. Don't you
love about Trump's just like, this is what
he does. Or he has these new sessions
where he's basically like, okay. Now you say
something good about me. Now you say something
good about me. Stop about stop talking about
that. What about the statue? Which he, you
know, he was kinda joking. But the point
is, these kind of sessions now are sort
of like, Trump is so great and he's
winning and everything's so great. It's just like
it's it's North Korea style. It was very
embarrassing.
So
what he's doing is watching him read this,
and and let's not forget the timing of
this.
Trump Trump just literally said this in a
recent you know, he said it before too,
but he came out and just just vomited
the idea of Obama and the money and
Iran, and they started this because they're floundering.
And they need and let's not forget the
money was stolen from Iran, and they gave
it back to him. It's very easy to
prove. I've done it many times.
And so the story is just, well, Obama
made this all happen. And by the way,
made what happen? All the things that we
can prove aren't real, like nuclear weapons, at
least in the case of Iran right now,
as your evidence shows. But it's just just
cycling through the claims.
Obama bad guy. So you hate Democrats? We're
the right ones to blindly support. Understand?
But then what happens when you don't arrest
him? Shut up, Ryan. We support MAGA. You
know, that's that's the kind of thing we're
seeing right now.
That Barack Obama flew into Tehran
under the Iran deal and not Yeah. The
deal that actually made sure they didn't have
nuclear weapons maintained a, like, 3% enrichment until
Trump illegally pulled out of the deal or,
you know, unilaterally
outside of the deal pulled out of it
and and legally allowed them to increase it,
which they then turned around and called terrorism
because they're either dishonest or
unaware or, you know, stupid, I guess.
But so the money that was part of
that deal was them giving back money they
seized from Iran. Very simple.
And guess what they did with that money?
Not what they're claiming.
You might call it an inconvenient truth.
Iran took our money and turned it into
weapons and bunkers and ammo. Oh, okay. Well,
first of all, you mean like every other
government in the world, like you guys do
every day? Got it.
And now we're destroying those weapons, and we're
righting your righting, mister president, that grievous wrong.
Just look at the way he's this is
weird.
Like, these people are just, like, groveling at
the feet of this person. And, like, just
watch the way Trump's responding while he's reading
it, and he was pointing to president that
grievous those weapons and we're took our money
and turned it into weapons and bunkers and
ammo. And now we're destroying those weapons and
we're writing your writing, mister president, that grievous
wrong. Okay.
And make no mistake, we had to act.
And our objectives are clear. No nukes, no
navy, and Right. Oh, no navy?
That's a that's interesting. Now they did actually
say that toward the end of these conversations,
but right. In what world can no navy
this this is like a Gaza discussion. So,
essentially, we want you to be a a
group that sits in the middle of that
thing and and and can't do anything but
just acknowledge what we tell you to do.
Like, in what world does that even end
up being a state? That's the whole point,
guys. They want something that is a controllable
entity.
Why would anybody agree with that?
That's that's not sovereignty.
So that's I mean, this is we should
laugh at how stupid that is, whether terrorists
or not. It's like so even if you
think they're all terrorists, then acknowledge the deal
was never meant to be made because nobody's
going to agree to that. So it's war,
obviously. Right? I mean, that's the whole point.
And it's also there's a line about Iran
in case you missed that. Complete dismantling of
their missile program and defense. Incorrect. He improved
that today since they're literally still bombing.
Okay. Hold on a second.
Industrial base. And as
Marco pointed out that mission and the VP
as well has not changed since day one.
Trump seems really bored by this.
No. You know, the same kind of point.
Okay. So Obama is a he sent the
money or at least, you know, written they're
they're
claiming he funded terrorism, you know, or everything
else you said.
Trump has literally said he's a a traitor.
He committed treason. He said those words. Those
are very real serious words.
Nothing has happened. And guess what? Interestingly, Obama's
not sued him for libel or or slander
either
because that's not obvious. Right?
Okay. Eric Doherty.
Guess what? Holy crap. Red light.
It's not even a joke. It's like it's
like clockwork.
I oh, for Aubrey that second. So he
says,
TNI, Tulsi Gabbard, has learned The US intelligence
intercepted Ukraine government plans to route hundreds of
millions of American tax dollars to boost Biden's
2024
campaign against Trump. I just they just it's
a hamster wheel for these people. The same
old stories recycled over and over. Now even
if it's real, my point is nothing will
happen. But it's it's Biden and, you know,
Democrats and Obama and and 2020, and it's
like the same recycling elements just over and
over, and then nothing happens.
Gabbard is now asking The US agency the
the,
USAID
to determine if the plot was carried out.
Oh, you mean the agency that you guys
told us was shut down? Funny how that
works out. I just think it's ridiculous how
every day it gets more and more stupid.
I mean, we know it wasn't because we're
not dumb, and we showed you that it
was literally absorbed by the state department. Even
Marco Rubio made it clear that it would
carry on in certain ways, and yet people
like Eric and the rest and Nick were
like, yay. No more USAID. It's been shut
down forever.
Either they were dumb or they were lying.
And here we are. Now they're asking the
group that doesn't exist anymore whether or not
that's what happened. The US tax dollars were
earmarked for Ukraine to use for clean energy.
Gabbard's team even found that the communications intercepted
under Biden were not even thoroughly investigated.
Imagine that. Investigate and expose it all.
Okay.
Well, guess what? Now watch as absolutely nothing
happens at all, and Eric will nonetheless carry
on cheerleading for the people, allowing criminals like
Biden to not only be held to not
be held accountable.
My prediction.
But, you know, you can look into the
story for yourself. What I find interesting is
the story itself
is
a so just the news of the platform,
and they're the only one anywhere reporting the
story or at least having the source material
that they claim they got access to an
unredacted report
proving that. But they don't cite the report.
They don't link to the report. Nobody else
has access to the report, and only other
reporting is coming from a they're pointing to
this report and saying that's what they're claiming.
This just seemed a little bit odd to
me. So what's happening here? Is the Trump
administration just dumping this unredacted
unclassified,
excuse me, or declassified report? Because it was,
and they declassified it, they're claiming, and just
gave it to them, and then why wouldn't
they show anybody? Why wouldn't you prove that?
It's not classified.
You I'm calling their bluff. I think this
seems a little bit shifty to me, but
I'm I don't know. I'm I'm I've I've
seen stuff from Justin News that I thought
was good. So overall,
you should question it, like anybody should, me
or anybody, for giving you something without source
material. I just think that's fascinating to me.
Now it also could be that the Trump
administration or somebody else debt dumped one thing
to their hands that they calculated or manipulated
and said, don't show anybody else. Otherwise, we
won't give you something in the future, and
that's called
access journalism.
But
I don't think I I think at the
end of the day, the real point is
even if it is real, which wouldn't surprise
me because Biden's a criminal,
nothing will happen. And I don't know why
we can't see that by now with Biden
having a thousand things they could charge him
with, and they're not.
Here's what the SCIF said. This is a,
200 and, like, 300,000 follower count. Obviously, you
can see, you know, MAGA supporter. It says
they were never sending aid
every other day to Ukraine.
They were laundering your tax dollars right back
to their own pockets and campaigns to rig
elections, most likely.
And Trump posted it. Look at that.
US intercepted Ukraine government messages.
Okay. So as the president, I'm sure he
must know about that. So that means he's
probably involved with giving them that. I don't
know how else you can see that. Also,
he's posting it, which means he's aware of
it. So I guess, we should imagine Biden
will be arrested by the end of the
day. Right?
Probably not.
Wall Street apes.
Uncovered audio.
Shows Anthony Fauci, by the way. It's audio
from a
congressional hearing, so pretty sure it's public. But,
you know, whatever. And it says, Anthony Fauci
talked about having every major corporation require vaccinations
and making it as hard as possible on
citizens so they're forced to be vaccinated. Yeah,
man. That's disgusting. He should be in jail.
Right? Oh, guess what won't happen? And senator
Rand Paul says, I referred him to DOJ
for prosecution three times, by the way, and
guess what didn't happen?
Going to jail. He didn't get charged. Nothing
happened.
I mean, it's the same story, guys. I
don't know why this is not registering for
well, again, I shouldn't keep saying it like
that with where we are. I know why
it's not registering for people like this because
they're clearly not in this for the truth.
At the end of the day, you either
recognize that they've never even tried to go
after these people, which has to tell you
what's going on, or you just keep hyping
people. How long can you hype
nonaction?
How long can you hype these stories with
nothing going on?
Yeah. I can't
this is one I always have to bring
up.
Same kind of point.
Where Jones said in 2025 that we have
big, big, big,
big things coming down.
All the things coming. Oh, by the way,
on a note, there's now new action against,
I believe, Letitia James and maybe Comey,
but I have the same stance.
Just like I was showing that they it
turned out to be nothing because they had
no evidence and they made up and that
doesn't mean they're not criminals. I believe they're
very clearly criminals.
But it they dismissed them because there was
nothing there like the original lawyer told them.
And so now they're coming back at it
and, hey, I hope they go to jail.
If they do, I'll be happy to say
I was incorrect. I do not believe it'll
happen. And so this was what he was
saying
about those, saying these people insiders told me
they've got things coming down and, you know,
it it went nowhere. And, again, down here,
Decentive News shows how in 2024, he was
saying if we can just keep
president Trump alive, then we'll get Klaus Schwab,
Bill Gates, and Fauci, and Hillary going to
jail, except now Bill Gates is basically part
of the administration, so is Larry Fink. And
all the rest of them haven't gone to
jail.
Yeah. But, you know, maybe tomorrow. We'll see.
But if you're objective about this, you would
recognize by now that it's unlikely based on
previous action.
Here's another one.
The QI says, boom.
Here are the Pfizer documents with side effects
they wanted sealed for seventy five years.
And I said, boom. Here are four year
old documents.
I guess what's that's what's going on. I
don't understand. And this is this is dump
after dump after dump of people trying to
shove things in your face that are not
new and have been seen roundly, but it's
about trying to create the idea that's somehow
new to,
I think, distract people from what's happening.
Here's Eric Daugherty
saying, Justin,
house Doge chairman. Apparently, it's now Doge again
even though they didn't use that term when
they announced it. You know, the same Doge
that failed or Elon Musk, you know, they
spent more, government government grew, they lied about
what they did, they basically sold you out
to an AI data system and Israel got
access to it. Yeah. All that. Remember that?
It's not a joke. It's very easy to
prove, and I covered it from the very
beginning. Like I said before, had we been
paying attention and listened to the independent media
and the IMA, for example, and said and
and recognized what it was going, we could've
stopped it. We probably could've done something to
push back and maybe even slowed it down.
But not now. They have it's o that's
over. That SIP has sailed. Like glyphosate, guys,
that ship has sailed, and they have access
to everything. They've unsightled the information, and this
is happening.
And now now is when we can step
up and call it the new problems and
maybe stop that from happening. But unless the
Joneses and Johnsons of the world shout you
all the way from seeing it
or the darnerties. But he says, Tim Burton
is launching his first Doge hearing to immediately
begin destroying billions of dollars. Oh, is that
what's gonna happen? Immediately destroying billions of waste
and fraud. Well, that's what you claimed happened
last time, Eric. And you guys all go,
oh, Elon Musk is doing everything, and he's
breaking it all down. And you were wrong,
and you lied, and the same thing, and
Doge got caught lying about all of it.
Virgin as a national treasury says probably over
1,000,000,000,000 in duplication. Okay. Great. I don't agree.
I don't disagree.
I think we are all defrauding us all
the time, including Musk and probably you and
say the bottom line is, I would agree
that there's fraud. Do you agree that something
will change?
I don't believe it will. I hope it
does.
But on that note, as Clarence Thomas, the
tank engine, writes
well, and on in case you didn't notice
this, the national debt has now hit $40,000,000,000,000
over it,
and it's it goes up every second.
And he wrote, Doge didn't fail. It was
never meant to reduce debt. It was meant
to siphon your personal data to Elon Musk
and his friends, private businesses, and gut agencies
that don't like or that try to hold
them accountable. It was a stunning success, actually.
Now, I might slightly frame it differently in
some of those points, but largely, I agree.
And that's why I yes, I agree it
was a success, exactly what they were trying
to do. And there's the point from before.
100% agree with that. But it's also important
to remember
those of us, not just me, plenty of
us out there who were trying to warn
you all about this,
about the deception as it was actually happening,
you know, and when we actually could have
stopped it. That's important.
Same thing now.
Here's just one example from 2025.
The DOGE deep state or the DeepDoge state,
excuse me. I'm just talking about this exact
problem. And well before that, right when it
started, we were critical of the lies that
were already happening.
Wall Street apes.
The money flown out of Minneapolis Airport and
by fraudsters has been tracked and used to
purchase
stuff in Kenya, apartments, luxury homes, car yes.
Yes. It's yes. This
is interesting to me. Seeing as how this
is the same conversation.
That's what this is. This is the same
conversation. This pertains to the largely between 2020
and 2022, for the most part.
That's the reality.
Now I don't see very many people getting
held accountable for that. Now right now is
my point. Now during Biden's administration, and this
is not a pro Biden point, I think
they're just as corrupt. But for whatever reason,
during Biden's administration,
people were indicted and even arrested and charged
for this.
Funny how that's not being talked about as
they frame it as if nothing oh my
god. Look at all the stuff the Democrats
did. We'll get realistically, you could argue that's
connection, but Biden's administration put them in some
of them in jail. Probably not the people
in charge because I think they're all that's,
you know, scapegoats probably. My point, though, is
pointing at this now is only to continue
to keep this this height like, basically incorrect
framing of what you claim is happening in
Minneapolis and Minnesota based on some Nick Shirley
spin off into some idea that we and
it's what has Trump done about it? If
that's the real point of making with all
these things. Who has been arrested, Wall Street
Apes? If you're claiming this is all so
provable and they're presenting the evidence, which I
agree the real story is, and it it
goes to left and right of the conversation,
and it includes immigrants and people in this
country, why has nobody been arrested for that?
You'd think that would be the primary point,
wouldn't it? Unless the game is to manipulate
people.
There's another one. I thought somebody down here.
It might be the next one. Oh, it's
this one here. So here, same conversation.
And this this new clip is going around.
Minnesota rep Christy, Knudson says that they just
found the state, quote, turned off tracking for
money being sent overseas. Now this is not
even a new story.
But the hyperbolic element is what she adds
to it. And it says they turned they
they turned it on for two weeks, saw
all the money leaving, and Democrats quickly shut
off the tracking to allow it to keep
happening. It's a very partisan,
misleading framing about that. Our government was absolutely
involved with this. And it says, I can
just play it. But as the point again,
same conversation. This is not even necessarily new.
And as Forrest Molyne rightly points out, and
nothing will change. See, anybody who's actually paying
attention will be already aware of the fact
that, yes, we we probably all, especially nonpartisan,
Not about left and right. I want the
criminals to be held accountable.
These people clearly don't.
I believe I've got the oh, no. I
didn't I didn't actually grab the clip you
can watch. I I when you play it
off, it pretty much reads what it says
right here. And it says, today in the
fraud committee, the Department of Human Services testified
that they haven't been tracking the IP addresses
of money that's being literally flown out of
our state and where it's going.
They did turn it on,
that reporting for two weeks, and they found
out, yes, a lot of those IP addresses
were tied to overseas computers. And then they
quickly shut it off.
Now the story is essentially what she just
wrote there. The rest of the framing about
some kind of, like, demand like, I look.
You know my opinion. I think these people
in government are willfully corrupt.
But that's not that's not the same as
saying I will assume every single chance I
get that that's exactly what's happening. That that's
not being care that's not caring about the
truth. So what I think is happening here
is a framing of this to throw it
at one side of the paradigm, which really
does involve the government, and about something, by
the way, that has already largely been addressed
and is still happening.
Doesn't that seem to show you? I mean,
didn't Massey already show you guys that Trump's
bill, or rather the Republican led bill,
allowed funding to continue
to the very thing that they all said
Nick Shirley exposed, the very thing that you
guys were criticizing.
And then right after that hype, they they
allowed the funding. Massey voted against it.
And yet these people still act like the
Democrats are well, the than the Republicans do
then, right, since they allowed the funding? It's
just it's just it's logic. It's it's honesty.
Oh, and this is funny. This is the
oh, I I forgot about this.
This is really interesting to me. So this
is Grock asking about if it's accurate. And
I always like to see whether the because
and for actually reasons just like this. And,
of course, never are we just blindly taking
Rock's view. In fact, it's always the opposite.
It's always about finding something other than Rock
and just like all source material, comparing them
for our own opinion. But the point here
is I asked it, is this accurate about
what she said? Just simple. Is it accurate?
And I said, no. The claim in that
post is not accurate. It misrepresents how tariffs
work
and what the economic data shows so far
under Trump's administration. What?
I said, okay. Maybe maybe I'm missing some.
Maybe I didn't watch the video all the
way through. And it goes, oh, what what
gets wrong? The idea that tariffs are deflationary.
Oh, okay. So what you're seeing here is
a ridiculous answer that has nothing to do
with the actual post. Now, of course, that
could be a glitch. Right? It could be
some kind of it just it had a
little problem and it glitched out. Or it
could be what I think it is and
what I'm about to show you it is.
Like we saw like I often point out
during the South African genocide conversation,
which was Elon got caught because Grok exposed
him
for deliberately
manipulating it to answer a certain way.
That's been shown more times I mean, many
times in just the last too many years,
like, since this administration.
And what happened is I've said before, and
it was look it up. It was widely
covered. Many platforms covered it, like, mainstream, is
somebody was saying, you know, what's the weather
today? And it was like, there's a genocide
in South Africa.
So and that that's when people are like,
what? That's ridiculous.
And so now same point. And I've seen
this more many times over the last couple
of days.
So I just okay. I was curious to
see what happened. So I just started a
new page, asked again.
And I asked, is it accurate? And it
says, no. It's not accurate.
It says, this is interesting. It kind of
conflates the two.
It says it appears to be a mismatch
or repo repost
error. The content in that Twitter post and
this is what I find most interesting. So
remember, they all at most all these posts
have, like, a specific identifier number in in
the URL.
That ID from Wall Street Apes is actually
about Minnesota state fraud
being sent overseas.
It says the poster
oh, but about about overseas, not about Trump
tariffs.
Okay. Which I didn't even ask. The poster
or someone likely intended a different poster graphic
claiming something like Trump just announced 25% tariffs
on Canada Mexico. What?
That specific claim is broadly accurate. Okay. So
clearly, in my opinion, which I'm gonna get
to in more in a second, this someone
on the platform is trying to direct the
AI to make a certain answer with certain
topics, and it causes it to freak out.
That's what I think is happening.
And it goes on to make always going
about tariffs. And I simply come out and
I say, why are you even talking about
tariffs?
And it goes, I apologize
for the mix up and my previous response.
And I I I what I want people
to understand, I made a point about this
the other day. This this
program
has been allowed
to assume, to infer,
which is counterintuitive
to what it's actually claiming to do. Now
look. I understand that a conversational app, which
is what they want it to be, it's
not the same as a data like, a
fact based report.
They they, you know, want it to be
able to engage. Not everybody's in this for
just data. Right? They want some AI to
talk to whatever. So to do that, it
has to be something that can have some
conversational elements, which it allow needs to it
claims to some degree have that, which I
do understand.
The difference, though, is what you're gonna see
here and what I've just recently seen the
other day is you ask it a question,
and and you clearly can see that it
assumes what you meant to say.
And I go, well, that you know, that's
not what I why would you assume that?
And he goes, well, because this is what
everyone's talking about. It literally says that. I
said, why are you even assuming or inferring?
And it says because that's necessary for conversation.
And I'm like, okay. Even if it was
innocent, if you will,
that is clearly showing you that it is
about you know, it could be slanted based
on talking points, based on who's back there
pulling the strings. And this is an example
of that, I think.
Continuing, it says you shared this specific ex
post, which I did, and I incorrectly
assumed
or conflated it with a different viral graphic
claim.
See?
Now how is that even possible with something
Elon says is all about truth? It's about
getting the right answers. Well, why then would
you let it assume based on something other
one that's manipulative and you damn well know
it.
This is what the post actually says and
goes on. Okay. What the core claim is
is the core claim accurate?
And it says Minnesota has faced repeated high
profile fraud scandals. Yeah. Exactly. That's what it's
talking about. The same scandals we've talked about.
And it says The Post adds interpretive spin,
which we know. I already said that. And
that's the reality since she's basically turning it
into her her framing of what she thinks
it is as opposed to just the government
being caught in some level of fraud or
somebody using the system for that. When I
asked if I and then this is what's
interesting.
When it responded,
it says,
in regard to the accurate clip, I said,
you know, is it is it accurate? And
it says, the video clip is quoted testimony
appears genuine. Now that may not mean much
to you if you're not messing with this
thing. The end of the point, though, is
that what it tends to it if you
the genuine term can simply mean, well, yes.
The video exists.
So it is genuine.
Not necessarily that it's an accurate claim or
that the video is real. It could be
AI. But it's genuine. It exists. Right? And
so that's what I said. I said, I
asked if it was accurate, not genuine. And
again, it says, you're right. I answered whether
the video clip was genuine.
And it says, but your original question was
whether it was overall claim is accurate. And
it goes on to make all these different
points. I mean, I think it's really important
to understand what it's doing. Now many of
you maybe don't maybe don't even engage with
it, and maybe you, like, probably shouldn't.
Even, you know, even I question whether sometimes
this is even worth the engagement or whether
I'm doing it, you know, it's but it's
like, I always say every time. It's about
a it's about making these individual choices on
what we think is gonna be. You know,
it's like using a cell phone or driving
or using going to Starbucks if you'd rationalize
these things. Now this is way worse, I
argue, in the sense of using it every
day. In fact, we're gonna have an IMA
thing coming up soon, I think. We're we're
gonna be talking about the the lines that
are being drawn with all this. So I
think it's very important because there's some of
us in the, you know, like,
I forget which one was talking about that.
That that made the argument the last show
about whether this could be used
for research.
And my opinion is that it's dangerous because
it very clearly can then, one, stop you
from doing the effort yourself and also end
up sort of guiding you in channels that
aren't even accurate. So my avenue tends to
be sort of calling out the partisan view.
And I'm I'm trying to make that that's
where I think I'm gonna leave it, ultimately,
because I think it's dangerous to fall in
the trap. But my point in saying all
this is that for people that are engaging
with this, like, for writing stuff, which, god
save us, that's actually exploding right now, It's
important to understand that it's being given the
ability to sort of be subjective,
and that's not how it's being framed. And
I think that's super dangerous.
Now bottom line is this, however, the post
casual claim, shut it off or to allow
the fraud to continue, goes beyond what established
in the testimony. So she's just, you know,
playing it fast and loose with the truth
because that's what partisans do.
Now back to this, here's what Jesse Waters
posted on March 24. I honestly can't believe
this is still happening. Because you remember, I
mean, in case you didn't follow it, the
the whole Nick Shirley story was basically glommed
on to the actual story of fraud in
Minnesota that was people were actually arrested for
in 2022 and before.
And he went door to door to some
random you know, which very well may have
been involved in fraud, but I don't I
never saw anything definitive other than who going
to random doors and them just shoving them
out the door and acting like that proved
they were criminals.
It was kinda disgusting at the end of
the day how he was harassing random children.
And guess what? He goes to California now.
Here's Jesse Waters. Here, look. Apparently, Shirley's in
California going door to door at daycares with
quotes.
Okay. Based on what?
Because they're they're it's a Democrat state?
I I don't understand why anybody gives these
people the kind of I mean, the credence.
Is this not ridiculous?
Of course, it could be fraud. Anything could
be fraud. But what logic are we going
on? You're walking up to door to door
to daycares in California, and it says 14
kids enrolled, seven enrolled, but not a single
toddler found.
I mean, I don't know. I I just
I I I can't I'd like to believe
that the majority of people,
probably outside of Twitter, are just not this
stupid, are not this willfully dishonest, or willing
to just allow people like this to act
like there's credence to what they're doing,
legitimacy to what they're doing.
Doors are being slammed because they're screaming f
you again. Yeah. Because you're a random guy
with a camera walking up asking about children
at a daycare.
That's disgusting. This is a creep.
This gets worse. 89 hospices in one building,
four violations.
Okay. Maybe they're criminals. I mean, what the
game of this making it about somehow day
care related in only California is because Nick
Shirley's recognized a shtick. He's realized when he
yells about this, people go crazy, and people
like Jesse Waters put him right on Fox
News. And guess what? He gets a lot
of money.
And guess what the point is if you're
following along.
So you're telling me there's all this fraud,
and no one's been arrested.
Walk me through that, Jesse Watters. Walk me
through how this is an important bombshell and
yet nobody ever goes to jail.
See, that's the only real point I'm making.
I'm never trying to suggest that there's not
fraud because I don't know. My point is
neither does Nick Shirley. But overall, I'm not
convinced left, right, up, down. It's people of
government especially, partisans especially
are riddled with fraud.
But who was arrested last time Nick Shirley
exposed all that fraud? He didn't. But when's
the last time? As I told you, there
were a bunch of people arrested in Biden's
administration, but last I checked, Trump hasn't arrested
a single person for all of that hype
about what happened in Minnesota.
And we can't be honest about how stupid
all this is. Okay. Well, let's talk about
the same kind of interesting
distraction,
if you will. I mean, I'm sure people
can disagree.
And even I have a worry that there's
something more like, you know, like I've always
talked about that because of how many people
caught on to the last illusion that COVID
nineteen was, maybe something else will happen. I'm
not even trying to fearmonger. It's just a
logical possibility.
But, you know, like like, deliberately do something
to cause the kind of panic.
And maybe somebody else who might do that.
But this is Fox News. March 25.
New COVID variant spreads across The US as
the CDC
raises concerns. Yeah. That's that's the Trump administration's
CDC.
Same people.
BA three two has been detected in 25
states and has shown, guess what, guys? You're
gonna be shocked. Immune escape characteristics. Guess what?
The vaccine is just not doing it, if
that's even what's really going on. A new
variant of COVID nineteen is spreading across The
US, health officials say.
The variant has shown immune escape characteristics, the
CDC stated, which means it has mutations that
may may help it per part partially evade
existing immunity from vaccines and prior infection. It's
just ridiculous.
Sable thing. Sure. You're out there counting your
blessings that you got those 75 vaccines that
don't work for you right now, but it
goes on. Oh, I guess oh, that was
it. The main main point for me is
the idea that, one, it's happening now.
When, really, 25 states, well, that means they've
been talking they've been seeing this for, not
just today, right, or yesterday. Funny how it's
just now being shoved from Fox News into
our conversation. I would wonder why. Now even
if it's a real thing, same point,
to point to to this is something they
know will catch attention. That's my opinion. It
could be maybe it's just reporting because they
think it's important.
But I think it's important to highlight for
the people who wanna see this as one-sided
conversation
that the Donald Trump CDC,
the RFK CDC under the HHS
is currently still
recommending COVID nineteen shots.
Now they may that may not matter to
some people. Maybe you think that's a good
thing. I think that's insane, and I think
it's dangerous based especially, it's just it's dishonest
or hypocritical rather based on what this administration
was is in some places still saying.
Twenty twenty five, twenty twenty six COVID nineteen
vaccine, which by the way, if you have
been following the show,
is new and out there as I showed
you right after. In fact, I showed you
this while they were claiming they were stopping
COVID nineteen shots.
And let me see.
I think it was this show.
Yeah.
And there's a there I think the show
before and after this was in the same
vein of conversation. Trump admin leans into self
amplifying mRNA shots under the guise of mRNA
or of of ending mRNA. And here's that
one in case you wanna see it. And
well, there's many of them, but this is
the one that's the that was, right there,
Arcturus.
And this is still being made. It's still
going forward. And this is the self amplifying
m r a m r mRNA COVID nineteen
shot. And and and he made a point,
RFK Jr, to explicitly state that our tourists
would continue.
In the very document that people screened shows
you he was stopping COVID nineteen shots. How
stupid this is.
Now that shot, as I showed you then,
was still going on, and that's the twenty
twenty five, twenty twenty six COVID nineteen shot.
That is the Comirnaty. That is the mRNA.
That is the same shot that we were
all fighting.
The Donald Trump's administration
is currently recommending
for people over six months.
Seems like a pretty ridiculous thing. Right? Just
simply from the reality of what they were
claiming before and what RFK said he was
gonna do.
ACIP. This is from health and human services.
This is from dot RFK Junior's
position.
What am I from his,
an institution? What if we're, you know
so funny how sometimes you just can't think
of it. But, you know, so you have
just to understand,
this HHS is, you know, the head of
the health dynamic in this country. CDC would
be under that.
And so it's important to understand that from
RFK being responsible for overseeing all of that.
And so even the HHS website put this
out. ACIP recommends COVID nineteen immunization based on
individual decision making. Oh, how nice of them
to say based on your own decisions, but
they still recommend it is the point. With
all he told us, which is right, dangerous,
deadly, never should be put in your body,
absolutely one of the most dangerous things I've
ever seen in my life, and it's still
causing this global population to spin out of
control. And I don't mean like I mean,
cancers and dangerous thing, which by the way
are now just blended in the background. We
don't even talk about it. But if you
ever taken a step back and looked at
the increase in in,
mortality, you just step back and look at
the increase in cancers, in heart attacks,
It's it's still going up. Like, people just
don't talk about anymore because the mainstream alternative
media is trying to get you looking somewhere
else, and that pretends to be the full
conversation.
Crazy.
So being moving on well, actually, two more
points on distractions. Let me put these in
the show notes for you.
On that point, I just kinda did this
to be funny, but I I definitely think
that
it is relevant for now.
We should definitely be questioning this claim in
general.
The claim that the COVID nineteen variant is
spreading, especially now, and especially when being made
by this administration.
But I just put this in just to
make the point. Right? That right now, it's
easy to see the consideration could be that
this story itself would be sort of a
break in case of emergency. Oh, new COVID
variant will definitely distract, but maybe not.
Now here's Betty Johnson.
President Trump turns 80 on the fourteenth.
He still got it.
Yeah. Real journalism.
It's just
like like shameless cheerleading.
But that's what that's what that's his whole
thing. Right? And then Health Ranger comes in
and says, when did you become a cheerleader
for a genocide of war criminal?
I'm like, really? Like, you know, I'm glad
he's calling him out, but I'm like, I'm
glad to see more people calling out these
obvious TeamSport politics manipulators.
But let's not pretend like Benny or the
rest of the group were ever, ever doing
anything other than what you're calling out right
now. He's been cheerleading since jump straight, man.
That's exactly what he's been doing the second
this administration started.
So is it that HealthRanger just never saw
it? Or I I mean, I don't know.
Like, I'm I'm glad to see people are
changing their opinions on this, but there shouldn't
be some kind of revisionist view about everything
just because, you know, these people were exactly
the same thing they are now that they
were when they started.
And the mail in ballots thing is just
additional point to this that I think is
insane. Like,
of all these points, I you know, funny.
Like, I keep talking about people that are
close to me who, like and I've been
I've been I've been talking about that over
the this administration many times. Right? How there's
people, you know, close to me who
are just regular people who are not pull
up they're not in a part of an
agenda. They're not part of a group. They're
not online, you know, media,
but are still falling for these things. And
I think that's important because I tend to
wonder whether or not just genuine, honest people
get tricked by this stuff and or, like,
an agenda. And and so they do in
some cases, which has changed the way I
report in a way because I know that
I have to tailor it towards not just
everybody saying this is lying. You know? It's
like which I would never do anyway. It
can't be the hyperbolic.
But the point is that even these people,
as of right now, we're like,
he's ruining his presidency.
You know, like, they're like, either he must
be blackmailed by somebody. Like, I don't believe
he would do this or whatever he's he's
driving it, this is ruining his presidency. And
then your people that are have been, like
in in previous conversations, we're still choosing to
support him even with how obvious and bad
it was.
And maybe just because they wanted to support
him and hope it went the right way.
And now even those people have found the
line that is too far. And so this
is one of those things that I just
think is embarrassing. It's a smaller point in
the larger conversation, but it just shows you
a an utter lack of conviction, guys.
Mail in ballots.
Here's how it started.
On social media
about
doing away with mail in ballots and potentially
electronic voters. Can you explain on that? Now?
Well, I will. That's a very off topic
just really quickly. Mail in ballots are corrupt.
Mail in ballots you can never have
a real democracy with mail in ballots.
And we, as a Republican party, are gonna
do everything possible. I agree with that, by
the way. I think I I don't think
mail in ballots should be part of it.
I think it's very manipulative. Like, he, he
pretends to believe. All that we get rid
of mail in ballots. We're gonna start with
an executive order that's being written right now
by the best lawyers in the country
to end mail in ballots
because they're corrupt.
And,
So, no, he's not saying
in some circumstances are bad and should be
kept for certain anomalies or certain situations, but
our corrupt badge shouldn't exist.
Let's not pretend that's not what he's saying.
It's exactly what he's saying.
You know that we're the only country in
the world, I believe, I may be wrong,
but just about the only country in the
world that uses it
because of what's happened. Massive fraud all over
the place. The other thing we So it's
we're the only country that uses them because
of fraud?
I just it speaks off the cuff. It
doesn't make any sense. But so it's also
about the electronic voting machines, which, mark my
words,
will be used
midterms will be used in this next election
or the next election, whether or not it's
involved.
I've I'm just watch, guys. They were you
like, he made the same case, and I
agree with, by the way, that I made
the case with going back ten years ago,
whether Clint Curtis and the testimony about the
fraud or anything else about how these Diebold
machines and all the rest are literally used
to manipulate us. That's part of how this
game is played. We're not even actually involved
in this process as far as I'm concerned
anymore.
And then guess what? He used them again.
Or rather, in this let in this last
election process, he used it again. And now
my point is now while he's president, watch
as they use them again in the midterms.
You have to understand what that shows you.
Now that was then. Here's now.
Tell me about mail in ballots, Colin. I
I yeah. You may not use the mail
in ballot. You probably said, yeah. I did.
Why did you You know what? Because I'm
president of The United States.
And because of the fact that I'm president
of The United States, I did a mail
in ballot for elections that took place in
Florida
because I felt I should be here instead
of being, in the beautiful sunshine taking
Oh, okay. So, you know, the same logic
that plenty of Americans also apply.
You know? And, yes, and then also some
places, there's fraud. Right? But so yeah. So
the idea that it's just okay for you
because you have a lot because I'm here
and I am busy and I I don't
want to well, yeah, Trump. So too do
a lot of other people feel that way.
And I wanna be clear again. I don't
agree with them being used at all like
he pretended he did. But he just did
one because
he can.
Beach served the last few weekends. That's right.
And I yeah. And I I decided that
I was going to vote by mail in
ballot because I couldn't be there because I
had a lot of different things. But, you
know, we Oh, we had a lot of
different things.
Great. We have exceptions for bell and bell.
You do know that. Right? So if you're
away, we have an exception. Okay. If you're
in the military, we have an exception.
If you're on a business trip, we have
an exception. Wow. I have a lot of
exceptions. I mean, business trips, you know, on
vacation, in
the military. You're just saying Now does he
agree with that when it's not justifying his
use of it? No. He does not. And
he's made that case. Able to we have
an exception. And if you're ill,
if you're not feeling good, then so I
Wow. Okay. Is that what Republicans agree with?
Then now you can just have a bunch
of evil Democrats who just pretend to be
sick to use it is how they probably
frame that? You know what I mean? Like,
it just it's just wildly hypocritical. And the
only reason he's defending it aggressively is because
he just got caught for doing it, or
at least it got found out and he
has to defend it.
If this hadn't happened, you know what his
argue you heard his argument. Bad, no matter
what, shouldn't be allowed. Because I'm all big
and tough when I'm not the one being
exposed for hypocrisy.
Is a way
mostly in Washington, DC, so I used a
mail in bell. But I appreciate the question
because I know I know it was so
well meaning. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. See, because, you know, you know
you got exposed and so he's well meaning.
Like, it's an honest question because you're being
a hypocrite and everyone else in the room
seems to be just petting, you know, you
know, you're doing so great, mister Trump. You've
nice shoes. What time where'd you buy the
shirt? You know, that kind of dumb stuff
they're talking about in the media today.
Wild.
Okay.
Let's get into Iran.
Now this, obviously, we've talked a lot about
over the last so many shows, and I
definitely think this is important
for many reasons. Now we're gonna start with
an important point of the reality
that a lot of us have already been
calling out of what the US government is
hiding. Now even speaking to things like that,
like the dishonesty of just, you know look,
I could you could admit a level of
tactic, tact you know, tactician or tactics in
the in the in the situation of not
wanting to expose that you've been hit or
that people have been killed.
Right. I mean, just, you know but everything,
you know, sort of, like,
unemotional,
you could acknowledge why that would make sense.
Because you it gives them an up or
makes them see that they're getting you know,
hurting you. But understand that there's a different
dynamic than just that. It's that Americans are
involved and that we are promised,
you know, plenty of things by governments that
never care about those things, but some of
them still seem people seem to believe that
they're gonna follow through. But the promises are
there nonetheless. And
about, for example, no new wars or peace
or whatever. But then, additionally, once it happens,
well, you know, no boots on the ground.
Well, it's already happening. And so my point
is you get lie after lie after lie.
And so one of them is that people
aren't being killed, and we know that's not
true, guys.
The fact that he's lying to you about
Americans being killed in a war that he
told you wouldn't start is not just dishonest.
It's disgusting.
And it's also disrespectful
to the people who are sacrificing their lives
and, in some cases, for things they actually
think are helping people. And they're wrong, by
the way. But my point is, as I've
always said, some of them just don't seem
to know that. Those that do, I don't
think it's respectful at all, or I don't
think it's honorable at all. But there are
some who seem to still think we're fighting
for freedom. And if that's really what they
think, then what they're doing is honorable. My
point, though, is that you're being lied to
about when they go out there and die.
You're being lied to about bases that are
being destroyed. You're being lied to about what
Iran is actually doing when it actually affects
US interests.
That is not okay.
And it is not just about him tactfully
you know, using tactics to manipulate Iran. It's
because he's trying to hide their
that he's being hurt, that he is being
affected, that their agenda might be failing. Now,
this is the New York Times. Iran's attack
forces attacks force, excuse me, US troops to
work remotely.
Now it says, this is from yesterday, Iran
has bombed US bases across the Middle East
in retaliation
for the US Israel war.
Simple, right? That's exactly what happened. It was
a a unilateral illegal attack with no justification,
and they
responded, forcing many Americans
American troops to relocate to hotels and office
spaces throughout the region according to military personnel
and American officials, to which they'll still deny
Trump and those are weird little click. They'll
they'll lie. Right? But this is very I
mean, to be clear, guys, we had their
satellite imagery.
Where was it? Well, this is the one,
but there's been satellite imagery that's come out
that shows you this big blown up basis.
And, actually, I think on the I think
it's the archive that's that's blocking them.
The it's it's behind behind a paywall. But
the point is sometimes the archive doesn't actually
pop up all the images, but there are
there are satellite imagery showing you the bases
that they destroyed.
And so
they're hiding that from you.
And what I think it shows in here,
two things,
is that the
there's a military and personnel that are admitting
that, and if they're still lying about it,
but on top of that, that they're moving
to civilian locations.
Just casually saying that now there's two things
to to discuss there. One, which is that
that means in the minds of Israel
and The US and what they've told you
since October 7, at the very least, but
more than that, that makes that a military
target.
It doesn't. As far as I'm concerned, it
doesn't.
The military using it makes that the military
you know, they're the ones breaking the law.
Now the right response, if you're gonna care
about international law, is to accuse them of
that and then have the international community make
aware that they're using civilian locations with civilians
in the buildings to conduct military personnel or
military operations. That's a big deal. That's a
crime.
So my point, though, is that because Israel
and The US are right now bombing schools
and hospitals, I mean, everybody, everywhere can see
it despite the partisan media lying about it.
Because, again, this is not in Gaza. This
is not in an open air prison you
control. This is the world that can see
what you're doing.
And the point is
that they might feel justified to respond.
Now they haven't and so far, not in
the way that's just, you you know, indiscriminately
bombing these locations despite the lies again because
you can see it. But in this case,
as Iran has even pointed to, and then
we just saw the discussion about them claiming
to target tourist locations, which is not what
he actually said. What he actually said is
now what I think relates to this, which
is really that we know where you're where
you are, and then ultimately, we know that
they're using these these locations, whether they're in
recreational or wherever else. Not the same as
saying we're going to bomb them or that
you're targeting tourists, which the New York Post
very dishonestly framed.
But I think it's important to think about
because if they were to bomb them,
that would be in the the the same
thing the US government is doing or really
claiming they're doing.
And right now you are getting some of
these allegations. Now it says Iran's Islam, is
their IRGC has urged people to report these
new locations
as it hunts for the dispersed troops.
See, that's that's Seattle's connect now. But yesterday,
we talked about them misframing what the general
had said. I think that's what they were
talking about. And then that exposes a crime
the US government is committing. And it says
you and even if their bases were destroyed,
it still doesn't make it legal for them
to go and use a little public per
civilian hotel.
US military officials say that threat is not
stopping the Pentagon from carrying out the war
with Iran, which is in its fourth week.
It says he then repeated repeated what has
become a common refrain from his new briefings.
This is from Hegseth.
Every day, every at the end of every
one, apparently, today will be the largest strike
package package yet.
Now pretty sure we can prove that's not
true. But what it shows you, like, the
idea that they've just continued to to exponent
or I guess it wouldn't be exponential, but
no. Because exponential, I think. But anyway, the
point is that, you know, if every day
it's larger I mean, every day it's growing
larger. That means it continues to get larger
and larger and not just, you know, like,
let's say you have 10, then it's 15,
then it's 20. And that's on top of
what you did. And the point is
that's that's
insurmountable or,
I don't believe that's even possible. I think
at this point, they would be already we've
already heard that they're running low on these
things, and that has been shown to be
the case. And yet he wants you to
believe that every day is another larger strike
package. That's just the example of them. Like,
it shows you how insecure they are. You
don't need to constantly be framing it as
the biggest, best thing ever. That's what Trump
wants.
Isn't that just very transparent? But either way,
the site let's just even take it at
face value. The idea that is every day
you're bombing more and more and more. These
aren't military targets, guys.
And he says,
but the or it goes on. But the
relocation of troops to makeshift,
one official called them alternative or sites raise
questions about Trump's administration's preparations for the war.
Of course, they won't address the point of
the illegality because that's not what people who
are supporting the war do. But it says
there were close to 40,000 US troops in
the region when the war started, which we
don't talk about, and Central Command has dispersed
thousands of them. It's also important to realize
that, guys, like we've always shown you, the
map of all The US bases surrounding Iran
and the troops surrounding Iran, and we're gonna
pretend like Iran was the aggressor.
And it says, some of them as far
away as Europe, American military officials said, but
many have remained in the Middle East, although
not on their original basis.
The result, according to the current and former
military officials, is a war that is much
harder to prosecute.
Ah, so the indications from people involved in
knowing what's going on are saying that it's
making it difficult for The US to conduct
this war. Quite a bit different than we've
won already and it's over. Right? Quote, yes.
We have the ability to set up ex
expedient operation centers,
but they're absolutely going to lose capacity
or capability,
said
master sergeant Wesley j Bryant, a a retired
special operations targeted specialist in the US Air
Force. He says, quote, you can't just put
all that equipment on top of a hotel,
for example. Some of it's unwieldy.
The US official said troops are not working
from the roofs as fully in hotels. Nice
nice follow-up. The point, though, is it that
they've lost capability. Like, you don't books I
mean, that's that's obvious. You don't explode these
bases and force them to move in hotels
and act like they're gonna conduct the same
war.
And at least with the places that were
destroyed. There's more than 13 bases, guys. But
the point is that's a big deal that
they're not admitting and is having an effect
on what they're doing. Many of the 13
military bases in the region used by American
troops are all but uninhabitable.
With the ones in Kuwait, which is next
to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage, six
US service members were killed in a strike
on Port, Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai
Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai
Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuaihuiba Shuai
Shuai
Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai Shuai
was the,
early warning system. That's the next paragraph. But
they did get that, and it's a big
deal because at $1,100,000,000,
if I remember remember correctly, it's a lot
of money, and it's also important for their
operations.
Iranian drones and missiles also targeted Ali Al
Shalem Airbase, damaging aircraft structures and injuring personnel,
and Camp Buring, damaging maintenance and fuel facilities.
In Qatar,
Iran struck Al Aloud Airbase, a the regional
air headquarters of the US Central Command, damaging
an early warning radar system, which, again, he
said they took out the eyes like it
was a big deal. And it says in
Bahrain,
a one way Iranian tac drone struck communications
equipment at the headquarters of the US fifth
fleet. Wait. I mean, they don't report most
any of this. At Prince Sultan Air Base
in Saudi Arabia, Iranian missiles and drones damaged
communications equipment and several refueling tankers. An Iranian
backed militia in Iraq launched a drone swarm
attack on an, on an upscale hotel in
April early in the war. Iranian officials have
even accused The US of using civilians as
human shields by putting American troops in hotels,
which they are. I mean, we just heard
that, and that's what US people are more
reporting. So what's funny is Iranian officials were
accusing of this and being called liars, and
now The US elements are admitting that. And
it says, quote, we are forced to identify
and target the Americans,
the intelligence arm of the IRGC said in
a message to people in the region.
Therefore, it's better not to shelter them in
hotels and stay away from their locations.
It says despite a a punishing air campaign,
the Iranians, quote, still retain some capability.
That's from
the the Dan Cain, general Dan Cain, chairman
of the joint chiefs of staff.
So think about this, guys. This is for
the Pentagon conference. Trump is out there in
Pegstaff. We won on day one.
How embarrassing that is. And yet the general
of the chairman's joint chairman, the chairman of
the joint chiefs of staff is saying that
we're we're bombing them, but they still remain
keep they're they have capability.
Now he says punishing and they still remain
to retain some. I think that's I I
don't think it's about some. I mean, clearly,
they have taken out plenty of ships. They've
taken out plenty of, they they control the
airspace. But as I keep saying, if you
care to look back before this started, that
was expected
even by Iran
to a certain degree. And so the point
was they plan for the long game as
they're, I think, proving right now. And I
don't mean because it's the long game, but
I mean that they're showing that they're not
diminishing, that they continue to be able to
strike through. And Trump keeps claiming they won
or we made a deal and then, you
better make a deal, but you just said
they made a deal. You know, it's it's
we'll get to that in a second.
It says part of the problem for the
Pentagon is that two decades of war in
Iraq and Afghanistan,
war zones where The United States quickly established
air superiority, left the military with facilities and
headquarters close to the current front lines. Yeah.
Right? Because they're surrounding Iran. And it says,
and now the war in Iran has made
all of these bases vulnerable to the point
where service members can't really live or work
there for extended periods, military officials said. The
lack of better planning, some military officials said,
also reflects
administration about how Iran respond. Now part of
this is trying to frame this as sort
of like the locations have made this hard
to live at. But you have to understand,
there were satellite
imagery showing bases that have been bombed. And
it says,
the Trump administration did not reduce staffing at
American embassies and other facilities in the region
before the war started or order departures for
nonessential government employees and family members, nor did
the state department warn Americans to steer clear
of the region until after the war began.
Think about that for a second. Now, lack
of planning, maybe.
I mean, they they in a way, they
kind of admitted that in the beginning.
But I think maybe that was sort of
a way to hide behind that and not
address the accountability.
But this is something I just wanna remind
myself to hold on. Let me look at
this real quick. On that point, I think
it's interesting to think about.
So what it said, the lack of the
the lack of better planning.
So,
what I I just wrote this for me
real quick. Lack of better planning reflects a
miscalculation on the party administration
about how Iran would respond. The Trump administration
did not reduce staff oh, that's just what
it wrote. So the point is they reduced
the staffing.
The embassies and other facilities in the region
were, they didn't, like, remove people or give
them warnings to move, nor did the state
department warn Americans steer clear. Now based on
that knowledge,
my thought, three things that seem the most
logical is either they just didn't plan, like
they're saying, which possible
seems unlikely, but it's possible.
Four,
the more dark possibility is that they wanted
Americans to get killed. And this may not
seem possible to some people, but if you
understand this government and our history, it's very
it's not as possible. It's it's one of
their options.
And so the point here is to consider,
like we said, with the the ships that
were brought out. Right? That early on, people
thought, well, they're just sitting ducks with what's
going on. I think the idea was that
they did this to hope that Iran respond
irrationally. They never do, it seems. But in
this case,
you put these things in position. You didn't
tell people in the locale that they had
to move until after it started. You didn't
warn the state department. All these things left
people involved with vulnerable positions.
So I think the hope was that maybe
this would immediately cause that reaction, which would
then guarantee support for the war. Iran's not
stupid.
Or
were they were of the mind that Iran
simply would not attack The US,
which undermines the whole point of how this
all started. Right? Well, we knew Iran would
attack us. Right? So you left them in
the places where you said you knew they
would attack?
You know, I I any of those make
sense to me, may or a combination of
them. It just speaks to incompetence or
criminality and a lack of concern for American
interests.
Now back to the article.
It says military officials say that American that
American refueling tankers were rushed to the war
with little time to orient or practice in
the region before getting thrown into the round
clock operations.
I mean, to me, that seems like an
obvious example of lack of training or that
they didn't expect this to go the way
that it went, and that might speak to
Israel like most people recognize right now. Even
Rubio kinda let the cat out of the
bag.
Israel Netanyahu seems to have, in my opinion,
convinced Trump that this was gonna be a
one and done. It's gonna be a few
days. Like, I think he said, they're gonna
block the straight. They're probably gonna kill Americans.
We'll have the whole world on our side,
and it'll be over like that. Your legacy
enshrined forever. And that's not what happened. And
quite frankly, I think that that's what Netanyahu
made sure wouldn't happen by bombing oil infrastructure
and making sure this became a whole swagmire,
which is what they've always done to The
US. And I guess Trump just didn't know
that or he's not able to make that
choice. I don't know.
Those are my opinions, obviously.
Now as Ryan Raspbiani points out,
the IDF chief
of staff has warned
about the possible collapse of the Israeli
Or what what it said let me actually,
let me make sure I didn't misread that.
Yeah. Okay. That that's funny. IDF chief of
staff Warren's army could okay. I'm sorry. I
just misread the the statement here.
IDF chief of staff Warren's army could collapse
into itself. So let's talk about the IDF.
And just cut to the chase since I
read that funny. The point is, Harrettes is
reporting
that. And a lot of people just, you
know yeah. I you shouldn't take his word
for it because he doesn't post anything. But
I wanna highlight that he is correct. That's
where it's coming from. But what he's discussing
is based on that article as well, that
Iran is simply saying, like, look. You guys
are being attacked. These bases are inhabitable. And
and simply saying almost as if they have
a position of strength. Right? And then today,
he's reporting that they're saying that they're essentially
failing. Now it's interesting to me seeing as
how Haraz is reporting that. Israel losing sway
over Trump on Iran war. And it says,
the IDF chief
warned
the army
is nearing its limits as forces divert to
other escalated fronts. And it says literally, as
Haaretz frames correctly, Jewish terrorism in the West
Bank, because that's what it is.
It's not a secret, and it's not only
because, you know, the point is simply that
this is exactly what we're talking about. Jewish
extremists who are burning homes down in the
West Bank and occupying territory.
It's a reality. Now it's important also to
recognize, and this is from a Israeli platform,
the Israeli human rights group that highlights in
2021,
a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid.
Now the point is always to mention is
that Zionism is not just about Judaism. Zionism
is a manipulation of Judaism, but it does
very much create that mindset just like you
can see Christian Zionist supremacists like Pete Hegseth
very clearly. Point, though, is to recognize
that what even Horetz is highlighting is one
that the IDF chief is admitting that they're
nearing their limits, which
I think they don't I think they've met
they've neared those limits after on October 8.
My point, though, on top of it, is
that I think it might be about them
trying to act like, just say, basically create
the situation where The US, as I predicted
in the beginning and as anybody probably saw
coming who's been paying attention, is gonna be
the sole one to be fighting this war,
and Israel stands by and watches. But then
also rightly points out what's actually being focused
on, which is their extremism in the West
Bank and
what everybody knows is a crime.
So as Scott Horton rightly points out,
trust me, Benjamin Netanyahu.
And it's what this person highlights. Nobody in
the Trump administration planned,
which is one way to look at it.
Nobody in the administration planned for Iran to
shut the Strait Of Hormuz. Now I I
argue the exact opposite. See, this comes from
a position, I argue, where you think that
they don't want these things to happen because
they care about people and the interest. Like,
that's not true. If you've known anything about
our history, you know the one thing is
the government does not care about people.
The point is that they would want it
to shut down, so use that as justification
for what they would do, in my opinion.
And in fact, there's evidence to suggest that's
what they planned.
But he says nobody planned for that because
of the way they acted. Right? But
if the plan was to make sure they
did it, you would react that way to
play the idiot. Right? They would always rather
be look incompetent than criminal. Right? He says
nobody planned for the sustained missile strikes on
American bases across The Gulf. Again, you could
argue that was the plan to make sure
people got killed and you could use the
justifications.
Nobody and on top of that, the Gulf
part of it excuse me, not the American
bases, but the Gulf part of it. I
mean, the idea there is about
whether Iran would choose to bomb the the
elements of the Middle East. And, mean, I
do think there was miscalculations here, to be
very clear,
or that Israel misled him. And it says
nobody planned for an energy crisis. But, again,
guys, seriously, if you didn't think that they
were aware that this would lead to exactly
that, which everyone's talked about forever, I don't
even know it's possible. And And this is
nobody planned for Europe to look at Washington,
shrug, and walk the other way. But this
is nobody, it turns out, planned for very
much at all.
Read the account of how this war was
decided, and and you are left with one
deeply uncomfortable realization. The people who launched it
appear to have been genuinely surprised by almost
everything that followed. Now maybe maybe if that's
because Trump listened to Netanyahu when he was
lied to, and it says the Iranians shot
back, the allies didn't show up, the oil
prices went vertical, all of it apparently was
news to them. At least they said that
or, you know, that's what it appeared to
be. He said the opposite when you asked
him down the line and said, no. We
planned for everything. But it says, which leaves
two questions so obvious, they're almost embarrassing to
ask. What exactly did they think was going
to happen?
And did anyone in the room at any
point think further ahead than the applause?
That's a really good way to frame that,
I think, especially with this administration. Now the
one I wanted to what I want to
highlight here is even the way this guy
is framing this is this little graphic says
Iran threatens
second
choke point
and points in the Baaba Mandev Strait.
I mean, really? Okay. So here's what's interesting.
Iran didn't threaten any of this before they
started this illegal war. And so what their
art what they were talking about was that
if you keep conducting this illegal war against
us, that one of the options we could
take would be to shut your access down
to the other side of this. But that's
if they continue to be like, right now,
if the US stopped what they were doing
and Israel stopped bombing Iran, they the what
they would what they told you they would
continue was their ability to restrict their access
to the Strait Of Hormuz.
And, what was the other discussion they had
about
how but the simple point was they would
not continue the bombing campaign. The war would
stop. But you see, from Israel and The
US's perspective, they can't allow it because they're
in a weakness position right now. They can't
allow them to have that control over just
their access to a very important waterway.
So this has now become a war of,
you know, start as a war of aggression,
but it's become now a war of necessity
for The US and Israel, and so they're
kind of trapped.
I think that's interesting. But to highlight it
like this just seems dishonest for me to
seem like it's sort of like the evil
Iranian government, you know, seeking to plan to
control. I just don't believe that's the way
that I I'm that's the way I might
view the graphic. His statement up here is
not saying that.
Now same kind of point here. And just
for time, actually, where are we? That's not
that long.
Daniel Davis points out, this magazine cover tells
you all you need to know about the
US Iran war. And, of course, it shows
a hand with an Iranian ring
grabbing a world map and holding it in
his hand. Right? And this is this is
more so the point. The other one was
more of my thought it was leaning towards.
This one's very clear, which I think this
is important to consider about how this is
played right now. Or maybe even just that
these are honest people that I would argue
are missing a larger point,
which is that okay. Like the corporate media,
CNN rather is like, okay. Trump's lying to
you, and he is.
But making the story so that he's doing
this from the wrong direction, not necessarily that
he shouldn't be doing it. Right? And that's
always how the corporate media plays this.
Adversarial
against parts of it, but we support the
war. Right? It's always. And so the same
kind of thing is that in this, it
makes it clear, as it says, president Trump
routinely says, we have won the war and
obliterated
all of their capabilities.
You
know, and, of course, it says, still, of
course, it's closed. It is not closed. And
Tehran retains a death grip on on the
flow of 20% of the world's oil. So
basically saying that Trump screwed us by doing
this,
starting a war of aggression. But then, of
course, the perspective remains, it seems, that Iran
is an evil terrorist organization that will take
over the world.
I just don't know. I mean, at some
point, we have to recognize that it's not
just their justifications.
Like, why would they need to fake law
create lies to go after you know, if
they were the terrorists, then they wouldn't need
to create all these manufactured stories. Right? It's
like we have to start realizing that there's
more than just the other side of the
paradigm that we hate so much, but rather
the entirety of the government has lied to
us our entire lives about pretty much everything
we deal with in some ways. And it
says, because of that past malpractice and diplomacy,
using talks as a cover to prep for
military operations, which is what they always do,
the Iranians will not listen to any proposals
to end the war right now that they
do not do not advantage them. Of course.
Because that that's, like, that's you know, outside
of the bad guy, good guy framing from
anybody else, that's what anybody would do in
that position. And this is because of our
war of choice, which is what it is,
we're they're either see, not we, but as
weather recently pointed out, but they, the government,
not we, because our
but same point. But because of their war
of choice, Iran now has leverage,
not only over The United States, but over
the global economy
in a way that would never otherwise have
been in their hands. Now that that's true.
But it says this is the bitter fruit
of foolish and arrogant policies from our country.
The grave problem now, however, is that we
are at a moment to where to we
are at a moment to where rational and
sober reflection would lead us to finding a
hat in hand solution to get the war
over at any cost as soon as possible.
But evidence is growing that we're going to
do the opposite and expand our foolishness and
expand the war on the ground.
If the if there's a fire burning already
in The Middle East, this could turn it
into a flaming I mean, I don't know.
Maybe I just read that with a certain
frame of my mind. I get the sense
that it's kind of trying to frame it
as, you know, it's dangerous to allow Iran
to have this control.
A month of bombing, Iran has achieved nothing.
Will Donald Trump escalate? I mean, it's more
it's the image, I think, is what really
does that. You know? Like, it's some kind
of control structure. But either way, I think
it's fair to point out
the over the idea of why they, you
know,
have created a situation that has put them,
kinda like I was saying, in a very
dangerous position that has now almost trapped them
in a logic they might not have won
in the first place.
Now talk about the deal conversation,
which really is just something special, guys. This
is the weirdest thing. The way that he's
done this, again, like I said to start,
I'm pretty I'm I feel like
if I like, again, it's all up the
air. If I had a bet on this
right now, I feel like he's making the
entire thing up.
So Donald Trump,
in this recent clip, asks Steve Witkoff for
permission, which as everyone seems to have pointed
out, is very telling.
Asks him, am I allowed to say this?
And he talked but you could argue it's
been always deal and what I might expose.
Maybe because Trump always seems to well, that's
almost the point, isn't it? Trump just seems
to always say things he shouldn't, and now
he asks. It's interesting. But he asked about
what the gift was.
I'll tell let let him tell you for
himself. They they remember the story is that
he was dealing with some secret defector from
Iran that and that we and they offered
a gift and to, like, prove that they
were really who they said they were and
that they were the only ones that could
do it, and then it happened. And and
then it is oil and gas related. Right?
Well, here it is.
Very substantial talks going on with respect to
Iran
with the right people.
You know, I told you about a present.
Right?
Steve, can I reveal the present?
You can do anything with the Thank you.
They said to show you
the fact that we're real
and solid
and we're there,
We're gonna let you have eight boats of
oil. Eight boats. Eight big boats of oil.
This was two days ago.
And they'll sail up tomorrow. That was three
days ago.
And
I didn't think much about it.
And then I watched
the news, and they said
a very good anchor, actually.
Happened to be Fox.
But I watched it, and they said,
something's unusual happening. There are eight boats
that are going right up the middle
of the Hormuz Strait.
Eight big tankers are going loaded up with
oil right through and I said, well, I
guess
I guess they were right, and they were
they were real. And I think they were
Pakistani flagged.
Yes. And,
I said, well, I guess we're dealing with
the right people. And, actually,
they then apologized for something they said, and
they said, we're gonna send two more votes.
And it ended up being 10 votes. Alright.
I hope I haven't screwed up your negotiations,
but I thought it was appropriate to say
because I did taunt you the other day
by saying they're gonna give us a present.
Please don't say it. We're real
and solid,
and we're there.
We're gonna let you have eight boats I
mean, doesn't it just feel like he's making
half of this up as he goes along?
It's very strange. But let's get into the
logic of this claim.
You can direct me to Thank
you. They said to show
you the fact that we're real
and solid oil. Eight boats. Eight big boats
of oil.
This was two days ago. Three days ago.
And they'll sail up tomorrow. That was three
days ago.
And
I didn't think much about it. And then
I watched
the news. Okay. So
he's told something.
Like, this is really important. At least the
story. It could all be an entire lie.
Right? That's that's one of the options.
But he's told something.
Saying, you know, this will happen. Oh, I
didn't think much about it. Okay. Even though
you told us, you know, whatever, what something's
happening.
So you did think something about it, clearly.
At least you wanted us to think that
something might happen.
And then you've told this. So it's important
to understand that Donald Trump is not speaking
to anybody. Donald Trump is being told this
from Witkoff.
That's undeniable at this point. Witcoff is the
one relaying information from somebody they claim they're
talking to.
And he's being told that this might happen,
at least within the story. So is it
not one of the possibilities that this is
a lie coming from somebody who's already been
caught lying to Trump about numerous things that
people in the inner circle of the diplomatic
conversation have said Jared Kushner and Witkoff are
basically Israeli agents? Direct quote.
That's
certainly possible, isn't it? Or that this is
something that they're playing him with. You know,
there are, like, plenty of these different options.
Oh, and then they they said, whoops. We've
said something wrong, and we'll give you two
more. Okay. Okay. Well, another thing to add
to this conversation
is the fact that as I know you've
seen, and I'm glad I started making a
big point about this. I wasn't sure if
it would be as important,
but the Strait Of Hermos has never actually
been closed in the way they keep claiming.
It just has not.
It's right now all you can see all
the traffic. Now in regard to specifically oil
tankers, it was restricted
in plenty of ways.
One, first of all, because
I think the US government in Israel
scared everyone away from thinking it was going
to happen. Iran from the very beginning, as
I highlighted, said that they they they they
lobbed the threats that we all saw in
the beginning. And then they made it clear
as he went on TV and he put
out articles and said, we're this is closed
to Zionists. This is closed to people who
are gauging the war against us and made
a point to say, as I'll show you
right now,
like, recently,
Spain was allowed to just go through the
Hormuz Strait Of Hormuz. Be and be it's
being documented because it's already been happening before
this on top of the fact
that what they're saying is, look, Iran keeps
telling people. This is the at the UN.
Nonhostile ships can go through the strait. And
the reason they have to keep stressing this
is because the only narrative out there is
the strait's closed, and The US and Israel
are scary and threatening. I argue even forcing
people not to go through. My opinion.
Why? To create this idea that this is
so restricted. So back to the point. If
he's telling you,
then we looked and we saw 10 boats
going through. Well, you mean aside from the
other thousand boats that are going through? Are
we talking about the fact that you needed
to argue it was shut down to pretend
that there was some new thing happening? Like,
there's all these different anomalies to it, but
I think it's interesting to even frame it
as closed down when it's totally not. And
Iran keeps telling people that it's not, and
we can see ships going through that are
not. Now the question also becomes,
is he just pointing to ships that were
going through, like Spain, and going, see? Like,
that's us winning because the deal went through.
Like, I was success like, thinking about yesterday.
Then ultimately, it becomes sort of like,
they agreed not to have a nuclear weapon.
So with the deal worked, and I won.
It's over. Even though that was already where
we were because they didn't have a weapon,
and they already agreed that the last time
and the time after that. So in a
way, he knows he's losing, so the argument
becomes, let's pretend the deal is what we
already have. And Iran will deny it, but
I'll pretend they just don't wanna admit it
or whatever. All hypothetical.
As it goes forward, we'll find out which
one goes where. But you know with the
track record,
this platform and a lot of the independent
media has around seeing the writing on the
wall here.
So
it ends up being 10 big boats of
oil. Well, you know, there's only one small
little problem with that.
Ultimately, it turns out,
Bloomberg says those tanker tracking data that they
have shows that didn't happen.
Of the eight, it says, tracking data since
March 23 shows no sign of the eight
boats full of oil that Trump says were
gifted to The United States. Quote, if this
was some great present, you'd think both sides
would want you to know their own reasons.
Don't don't you think? Yeah. You do. Well,
of course, you could play into it and
say, well, maybe this was a defector, but
then wouldn't the Iranian government know that they
just gave them oil somehow? Well, I don't
know, man. It just doesn't really line up,
does it?
Kinda think he's making it all up. But
on top of that, the inser the absurdity
I'm kinda jumping ahead real quickly, but the
absurdity of all this is that as we're
in this conversation and he's telling you, I'm
literally talking to a defector from Iran, and
I don't wanna get him killed. And then
the next day says, I'm in an a
15 plan to Khamenei's government.
Okay. Well, shoot. Maybe he's dealing with both
of them. That's, I guess, possible. But then
it goes, okay. We're making a deal, and
they wanted they're begging me for a deal.
The government. Not not the defector, but the
government. Okay. I that seems strange with what
we're talking about, and you just publicly said
you're working with a defector, which you know
that they would hear. So that doesn't really
line up either. And but then we get
to the point to where he goes, the
sick Iranian leaders need to deal oh, you
mean the ones that you wanna make a
deal with for peace where they can continue
governing? But they're sick and deranged terrorists? That
okay. But you want you want them there
still, and you make a deal? Okay. Got
it. And then the very next statement becomes,
you better make a deal before it's too
late. You better get serious, but you just
said they made a deal. Didn't you just
tell us that you were in the middle
of that, or didn't you say you know,
your point is, guys, from one second to
the next, what he's saying
is is contradicting the thing he said before.
Like I've been telling you all these years.
This one, Trump says The US,
that that Iran that US will be Iran's
worst nightmare if he doesn't agree to peace
plan. You know, the one that he says
they've agreed to already. Or
Trump cast out on the prospect of a
deal. Woah. Woah. Woah. Hold on now. That
got out of control really fast. Now it's
not even now it didn't even happen. But
then you just didn't just give you a
bunch of oil?
What? What's going on right now? And then
Trump says it's up to Iran to convince
The US to end the war. Okay.
Yeah. That's fine. Right? That's that's an exciting
little turn of nonsense. But, ultimately, the problem
is that you have a lot of people
out there who just aren't paying attention, don't
care.
Not the majority of my mind. I keep
saying that, but it's a lot of people
who are framed as everyone in the conversation.
So continuing.
Guess guess who reported?
Holy crap. Red light says Donald Trump just
revealed that the president's or the the Iranian
leaders gifted him eight points of oil.
They apologized for something and sent two more.
You know? Right. Because you just blindly report
that as fact because Trump said. Because Trump's
never lied before. Right?
Literally. I mean, if you guys don't remember
this, somebody just made this because I've said
that off the cuff. So I was kind
of just referring to him as the red
light holy crap, guys. They just and they
just keep keep making that red light holy
crap. It's just weird to me. But that's
that's what it's supposed to be.
But the idea is
it happened. We know because Trump yelled it
out loud. Well, Trump says Iran let 10
oil ships through the Strait Of Hormuz as
present.
Says Iran made the gesture to show The
US, quote, the fact that we're real and
solid and we're here or we're there.
So at this point, though okay. Look. Here's
what's interesting.
And I'm doing my best to be objective
about this. It's kind of ridiculously obvious that
he's lying about a lot of this. That's
why I frame this as the faux negotiation.
That that very well could be with a
Braille person. There very well could be some
kind of deal going on, but it's still
a completely broken like, he's lying to us
all over the place because in the moment
for moment point, they're they're they're
contradicting each other. But as I said in
the beginning, you could argue that's his tactic
to get a good deal. Maybe you agree
with that. But at the end of the
day, he started this by telling us or
the point was the
element he was talking to, he didn't want
to get killed. Not the current government who
he said was irrelevant, who shouldn't be dealt
with because they're all hiding in bunkers and
then dealt with them the next day, which
is what happened. The which, by the way,
I didn't tell you, they denied, in case
you didn't watch yesterday's show. He gave a
15 plan to Comenity's government to which they
immediately denied.
And then he said they're thinking about it.
They said, no. We're not. We're not even
looking at it. It's embarrassing what's happening right
now. But, of course, it could all be
a bunch of lies. The point is that
after that or before that, he said the
defector guy was somebody who was secretly working
with trying to make a deal. They didn't
wanna get him killed,
and then said that he was gonna offer
a present. Right? That's how that story came
around. So the so called present was supposedly
from this not committee government person. Right?
That's not deniable because that's what he said.
So then, today, we're being told that he's
got 10 oil tankers
that apparently come from the defector or whatever
you wanna call it, the person not in
the current government that he's speaking with.
So when we're talking about this today, I
find it strange that it's kind of broadly
being framed as that came from the Iranian
government.
And not in, like, just a broad general
sense, but specifically the current community government. Now
it says Iran and now that may be
the reality, and maybe he just lied about
that secondary part for who knows why. But
it says, Iran made the gesture to show
The US the fact that we're real, we're
solid, we're here.
Iran.
US special envoy Steve Witkoff, of course, a
top negotiator with Iran, said in the cabinet
meeting that The US has had, quote, multiple
reach outs
from the region and others who want to
play a role in ending the conflict. Now,
look, we've already point made this clear.
Pakistan,
Turkey,
they've been playing mediator roles in this for
a while or kind of like secondary roles.
And Iran made it clear weeks ago,
we're done. We are not dealing with you
anymore. Every single time you feign negotiations and
you kill people, it's not we're done. We're
not playing this game anymore. That's what they
said. Who knows if they change their mind?
But the point is that they can it's
been shown numerous times they're passing they're trying
to send information to the mediators through Turkey
and Pakistan,
like the one they did two days in
through Italy that Iran denied, where Trump offered
a ceasefire as Israel reported, and they denied
it flatly.
That's why he got all angry and started
killing people, and then he realized he's losing,
and now he's trying again, it seems. But
the point
is that the people that are reaching out
for all this are the people that have
always been doing that. And Iran is already
knowing they say, we see the messages. Now
this is all just off the top of
my head, but it's stuff that's been reported
yesterday and day before directly from Iranian statements.
And what they're saying is, we see the
messages. We see what they're sending. We're and
we're just we're not responding. We are not
engaging.
And it says, Witkoff also confirmed that The
US had, presented a 15 plan,
but noted it had been delivered via Pakistan.
That's that was my point. They got it.
They said they saw it, but it's and
it it was publicized, and it's ridiculous.
Not only are they going, we're not gonna
engage anyway, but you could read through it,
and I can give you six of those
points that I can guarantee you they're not
gonna agree with.
So and, also,
it was presented to the Khomeini government. Now
it says Iranian state media on Wednesday reported
that Tehran rejected the ceasefire
that was presented to the Khmer government and
submitted its own list of conditions standing in
the war, which is five main conditions to
which they already said they've been want that
that demanding, but it's in addition to what
they've been they said were necessary before.
Now, see, the point is they were willing
to have an actual agreement to have a
discussion like before with the JCPOA, which they
upheld, that Trump removed himself from. And in
this case, they made it clear with plenty
of examples that they were willing to go
forward with this, and they bombed them and
destroyed that. So now why would they give
them concessions?
They're gonna they wanna make that sound like
they're terrorists and won't deal, except that's the
exact opposite of what the reality is. So
here,
where they rejected the ceasefire and submitted their
own demands, what they're simply saying is not
we want you to come to the table
and cock. That's how Trump tried to frame
that because he seems desperate. And they made
it clear, we're not talking.
This is what we want. That's it. Until
you give that up, this is where we
at. That's what they're saying anyway, to be
clear. That could change tomorrow.
Now it says, quote, that was three days
ago, and I didn't think much about it
in regard to the statement of giving him
a present.
But while watching Fox News later on, he
claimed, that's what he just heard him say,
they said something unusual is happening. There's eight
boats that are going up the straight. Guys,
this is insane.
So on Fox News, he happens to see
that's happening in a in a straight, by
the way, that's totally not closed down. And
on top I mean, has anybody I would
love somebody even to show me that Fox
News report. He said he watched Fox News.
Where is that report? Where is the evidence
of that report? It might exist, but realize
Bloomberg is telling you from the data that
that doesn't seem to be the reality.
Seems pretty interesting, doesn't it? So if somebody
could find the alleged Fox News report he
claims he watched of boats going through, I'd
love to see that. To be able to
add to the conversation and see what it
shows us, but I'm get the sense that
he'd made it up. Or that somebody else
told him that who was lying to him.
They said something unusual is happening. There's eight
boats going up the straight right now.
And I said, well, I guess they were
right
and that they're real. I mean, really, that's
all you need?
Somebody that you don't see
through somebody who clearly is in you know,
has an allegiance to something other than US
interest tells you that there's this is going
on and then tells you they see something
happening that justifies that it's real. I mean,
you're not even involved in that process. That's
what I'm trying to show about everything, the
military dynamic. This person seems like he's being
completely manipulated. And, again, that's not the same
as saying he's, you know, like, the point
of whether he was wanting to do this
seemed clear to me. He was
screening about going to war with Iran in
the beginning after the administration was when after
the election.
But there's also points to be made about
whether he might, in addition to that, be
played.
And maybe just because I think Israel always
seems to do that to US presidents.
But just think about it. Just ask it.
Don't assume.
And it says and I said, yeah. Well,
I guess we're right. And my guess is
real. And I think they're then the Pakistani
flagged. Why does that make sense? So the
argument then becomes that because they're the mediator
that Iran, what gave them eight boats full
of oil
for them to send? I mean, it's not
look. We could also point out that it's
possible that Iran doesn't wanna be seen as
weak and capitulating, but gave them the oil
in hopes that he might stop and maybe
stop Iran or excuse me, Israel.
That's a possibility. I can see that making
sense, especially in a world where Trump is
starting to see that Israel is manipulating him.
I mean, right. So, like, like, hypothetically, right
now, this is always where it matters, is
what happens. Right now, if suddenly Trump starts
changing direction and starts slowing this down and
starts, you know, and and I guess calls
out that Israel won't, I doubt that happens,
but that would seem to suggest that there's
might be a different agreement going on between
Iran and Trump. And that's always what we
need to consider is that there are things
that behind the scenes. Like we talked about
in the past example where the reporting suggested
that they essentially said, look, we'll bomb here,
you bomb there, and we'll back up.
And and and that's because both of them,
I think, largely Israel recognized that Iran was
at a more powerful footing. And they did
that though, and they stopped.
Right? And I think they do that more
than we think. Not because they're necessarily, like,
on the same side, but that's possible. But
because it's more about, like, in that moment,
they both necessarily realize they don't they, you
know, they wanna stop. And now it says,
they then apologized for something they said,
and we're going to send two more votes.
I don't even know why that makes sense.
I mean, it's just again, maybe there's more
information that adds to it.
So, again, they say no.
Didn't happen. There's no evidence. I mean, you
have to realize, guys, they they're that that's
what I'm showing you with that boat tracking
app that or the website. These things are
tracked.
He must realize that somebody somewhere is going
to eventually be able to prove whether or
not that happened. And then if you could
prove that there were eight boats that went
through at the moment he said that or
claimed he was watching some show, we should
then be able to prove one or two
things or both. Were they Pakistani flagged? And
if so, well, I guess maybe three, were
they full of oil? And then three, was
it in any way connected to Iran?
We'll be able to prove all those things
to some degree, and I I doubt we'll
get there.
Now this, I find interesting as well. Oh,
it's this here, actually.
And this is just some I just randomly
saw it looking down. This guy post this
clip. Now it just you you guys all
know this probably because you watch this show
and because you're
objective and nonpartisan.
But it it's so obvious to see how
this guy just kinda lies off the cuff.
And, you know, and you may even argue
it's about, like, not not, like, unimportant things
you may this is not unimportant. He's talking
about the amount of ships that they claim
they've sunk. But with all the lies we
see, we should wonder whether or not he's
even taking any ships. I mean, I know
they have. At least I think the evidence
is clear. You could see that anything would
be vague. But the point is that his
number seems to change from day to day.
Now realize,
as it goes on, yeah, that would happen.
But you'll note in the clip that it
go basically, if the first so many of
them are the same statement in the first
three days and the number changes.
You either have to acknowledge that he's just
making that up or, you know, he can't
remember and he he doesn't you know, same
kind of point either way you look at
it. But I think it speaks to exactly
who he is. He's gone
24 ships
in three days. We've knocked out
42
navy ships, some of them very large,
in three days. They have 32 ships. All
32 are at the bottom of the ocean.
So So right there, not three days. Right?
But he says they have 32. That's it.
And they're all gone.
On the bottom of the sea. It's almost
50 ships. Okay. Yeah. That was 50. Right?
So if they only had 34 and they're
all sunk, it's weird how they suddenly now
have 50 that are sunk. He's just notified
it's 51.
The navy is gone. It's all lying at
the bottom of the ocean. 46 ships Oh,
now it's all 36 and they're gone. Can
you believe it? Can you believe it? I
mean, it's just guys, there's it's there's no
even denying that.
It's just and it's yeah. You may think
it's a small point. It kinda is in
the larger sense of things even though we're
talking about people and chips and major, you
know, billions of dollars.
Just pretty obvious, though, I think, with what
we're dealing with. And if you think it's
unique to Trump, you're not paying attention.
So Brian Allen points out,
Trump says,
I'm proposed
or Iran, excuse me, proposed
to make me supreme leader.
Now, you know, there's a line here, guys,
where it's just,
you know, like, it starts to make me
wonder, is he trying to make you see
this? Now I don't wanna get, like, too,
like, qanon with it. Right? Or too ridiculous.
I'm not even you I'm gonna use the
term conspiracy theory because that's not what that
means. But realize that they're like, you start
to wonder, like, this can't be what he
thinks
is what you'll believe. What Iran's saying, we
want you to be the supreme leader, Donald
Trump.
And he no. No. They're insisting. They wanna
gab deal so badly.
Well, that's just not true based on everything
we can see. Now who knows? Maybe tomorrow,
he'll break the bombshell and show you it
all comes down, and I'll happily report that.
But as I always point out up until
this moment right now, the facts scream something
else. And all the mainstream alternative media are
not even looking at the facts. Has to
show you something. Here's what he said.
Anything like we're doing in The Middle East
with Iran.
And they are negotiating, by the way, and
they wanna make a deal so badly, but
they're afraid to say it
because they figured they'll be killed by their
own people.
They're also afraid. So what are we talking
about? They? Random Iranians, or are you talking
about government now?
Just it's just you have to admit that
there's there there are elements of this that
are undeniably
lies.
They'll be killed
by
us. Headly, but they're afraid to say it
because they figured they'll be killed by their
own people.
They're also afraid they'll be killed by us.
There's never been
ahead of a country that wanted that job
less. And what does he mean they'll be
killed by us? I guess, meaning that if
they make a deal with you
I mean, that doesn't make sense. I guess
what he meant was that that we might
kill the leader, but what he seemed to
say right there was that if they work
with us either way. Wanna Wanna make a
deal so badly, but they're afraid to say
it because they figured they'll be killed by
their own people. They make a deal so
bad, but they can't say it because they
make they
might be killed by them or us. They're
all afraid they'll be killed by us.
There's never been
a head of a country that wanted that
job less than being the head of Iran.
That really a clap worthy statement?
Trump's
personal opinion about what he feels on the
other side of the world?
God, we're stupid today.
I don't want it.
We'll listen to some of the things they
say we hear very clearly.
They say, I don't want it. We'd like
to make you the next supreme leader.
No. Thank you. I don't want it.
But I wanna express my gratitude to the
tremendous
It just gets more ridiculous as it goes
on. Trump says Iran begging to make a
deal. That's today.
So explain for me how you can be
saying yesterday
that they're offering a deal,
right, that it's happening or that the the
secret guy is, or now we're dealing with
Iran, but then Iran denies and turns down
your deal. But then today, they're begging to
make a deal?
Now look. You could argue that there's some
level of a deal going on. That's possible.
But for him to go there begging, it
just shows you who he is. That's obviously
not true
based on the facts anyway, the evidence we
can see, which is all we can do.
The Iranian regime is now admitting to itself,
he says, that they have been decisively defeated.
They've got a disaster on their hands. They're
defeated. They can't make a comeback.
It's just cartoonish.
Here's what he said.
We estimate it would take approximately
four to six weeks to achieve our mission
twenty six days in.
We're extremely
really a lot ahead of schedule.
Funny, like, you can note the moment when
he thinks I'm gonna go off the cuff.
He's like he's like, you can see his
finger on the page. He's literally reading the
statement and just kind of, like, nod barely
into it. And then it's like he tries
to go off the cuff, and then it
seems like he realizes, oh, I can't even
think right now. So I'm just gonna go
back to the page. I don't know what
it is. It's funny to notice that.
We're extremely
really a lot ahead of schedule. The Iranian
regime is now admitting to itself that they
have been
decisively defeated. They're they're saying to people. Oh,
are they? Yeah. Here's the ad lib. See?
Oh, yeah. They're saying things to people, and
they're talking and stuff.
Is that was that was that was needed
to add to it? This is a disaster.
They're they're saying to people.
Decisively defeated. They're they're saying to people,
this is a disaster.
You know? That's why they're talking to us,
and they're only they wouldn't talk otherwise. You
know, we this is so they're saying it
to people, are they? Except no one knows
about that, and it's not in any documents.
No one's saying it out loud. There's no
video. There's no reports. But they're saying it
to people. What people are you talking about,
Jeremy? Just it's not true. Even if it's
the actual reality of what they're thinking, they're
not saying that to anybody clearly because it's
not But he just had to say that
because he just needs to add his own
little 2¢,
his own cent and a half. But they're
talking to us because
they've got a disaster in their hands.
They're defeated.
They can't make a comeback.
Oh, really? Yeah. And and meanwhile, they just
bombed a lot today just in case you'd
missed that, which is true.
It's just ridiculous. As as Chris Martin rightly
points
out, Trump says the Iranian negotiators are very
different and strange. He's the ones they just
told you begged for a deal, and we're
already making one. They are begging us to
make a deal, which they should be doing
since they have been militarily obliterated. Wait. So
you start by saying they're different and strange.
And thirty seconds before this, he was saying
that they're they're better hurry up and make
a deal or they're gonna be suffering. Okay?
And then next sentence, they're
begging to make a deal, which they should
be doing because they've been what what you
just said they were, obliterated, which was zero
chance of comeback, and yet they publicly state
that they are looking at our proposal. Wrong.
You're literally contradicting your own sentiment with this.
It's just this guy seems like he's schizophrenic
right now.
Wrong. They better get serious before it's too
late. I mean, you feel it. He starts
by saying they're begging for a deal, then
ends the very paragraph with saying they better
get serious before
it's too late?
As as Chris rightly points out, I mean,
I I'm I we I think we all
have to admit there's something especially stupid happening
right now. Stupid's not even the right word.
Like, it's just this is it's it's an
unprecedented,
the level of whatever we call this right
now. And and Chris says, counterpoint.
The militarily obliterated country of Iran
hit
multiple military bases last night, most of which
are truly obliterated and rained missiles down upon
Israel. True.
But, you know, who cares? Facts. Right?
CBS or CNBC. Trump says Iranian negotiators better
get serious, which is that's the paragraph I
just read for you. Trump lashes out at
the sick Iranian leaders that he otherwise wants
to keep in power with a peace deal
because that totally makes sense.
Trump says US will be Iran's worst nightmare
if it doesn't agree to the peace deal
that it says they're begging for, you know,
because that's just normal. Right? Cast out on
the prospect of the deal that he just
said they were absolutely screaming about.
And, you know, that it's up to them
to convince us to end the war that
I'm telling you I wanna end because they're
making a deal, but they have to convince
me of the things that I'm telling them.
It just doesn't make sense, guys. You can
make a joke about it all day long.
It's very serious because people are dying.
People are literally starving to death. They're being
tortured all over the world in multiple locations
that this is in this war, because it
is the same war, is taking place.
Gaza, Syria, Lebanon,
all of it.
Now as he wrote today toward this is
03:30PM.
After all the different schizophrenic statements, as per
Iranian government request, he writes,
please let this statement serve to represent that
I am pausing the period of energy plant
destruction, you know, the war crimes that those
would be, by ten days to April 6.
Talks are ongoing, and despite erroneous statements by
the con to the contrary by fake news
media, the others are going very well.
Oh, so you you're you're absolute
in you know, what's the word he used?
Just, you know, shall not be moved. Deadline
was just moved for ten more days. Got
it.
These attacks on energy, that would be that
was we crimes. Okay. But this gets even
more ridiculous when you find out
that they're denying that. Now this is different
than some secret other Iranian person. Now, of
course, Iran can be making this agreement and
then lie about it. That is possible. But
what logic does that make? Especially when Iran
is the one saying they want this to
walk back and especially when Trump claims that's
what he wants, and then you argue that
you guys come to an agreement about actually
waiting to and then you they deny it?
Guys, it's not happening.
I don't see a world in which that
even remotely makes sense unless Israel's lying to
Trump through Witcoff or whatever else it might
be. Jeremy Skahill says, I asked a senior
Iranian official about Trump's claim. Iran requested an
extension on this threat. They said, Trump is
not being truthful. We have not submitted any
request regarding potentially of its attacks. Now that's
what Jeremy says he said somebody said to
him.
Then the Wall Street Journal came out and
reported,
citing mediators involved with the deal, which is
important because they're the ones that keep calling
out Witkoff and Jared Kushner as Israeli assets,
says
Iran has not requested a ten day pause
on strikes on its energy plants, contradicting Trump's
claim that the extension was made at Iran's
request and confirming earlier reporting by drop site
news from Jerry Jeremy Scahill. This just gets
ridiculous by the second, guys.
So it's very clear to me what makes
the most sense. Again, it's hard we're reading
limited information, is that Trump is so desperately
trying to frame this as him's his magic
deal making ability is driving this into a
resolution.
And in any other circumstance, I'm willing to
bet you that Iran would have just let
it happen because they seem to not care.
They let Trump pretend he's the big tough
man saving the world when everyone seems to
see through that. And in the past, they've
let that go. Like I said, after the
twelve day war, they they came out the
winner in that situation. Despite all the lies,
they didn't obliterate the thing. They did get
the enrichment facility. But the point is clearly
that they got through a lot to Israel.
And so they let it go. They let
it end. And they even made statements to
some effect. Right? But because of what they
did and because they kept
pretending deals and murdering people, they're done with
this now, at least what they said up
until now. So Trump comes out and goes,
okay. He wants to end it now. He
wants to fake some kind of a deal
that makes him look like he got the
deal, and Iran says that's not happening, which
which is probably really pissing him off. Now
either he's lying about it and he's mad
they're not going with it, or he believes
that this is actually happening because somebody's lying
to him, and now he's confused.
Here's what New York, the New York Magazine
put out.
This was today.
Does anybody take Trump seriously anymore?
Now, you know, they're part people are gonna
yell partisanship because usually that's almost always plays
a factor in this stuff. But, you know,
it's it's a real question we should be
asking.
Not because of partisanship or because of one
thing or but because he just is to
an objective person person who's not being led
by politics, which or that rarely exists today.
You just can see that he's lying, guys.
It's obvious.
He's contradicting his statements. Right? So at some
point, people go, okay. You know, even people
who are in the higher level that pretend
he's not, they still know he's lying. Right?
So at some point, you just start treating
him like he's not even real. He's not
a serious person anymore.
That's just interesting. But this this goes through
just kind of the recap. You can read
it for yourself.
Now here is Alex Jones
coming out yesterday saying, Iran rejects the peace
plan.
The peace plan. You mean the plan that
was literally designed to turn them into some
vassal state with no ability to defend themselves,
where Israel would 100%
take advantage of them and The US, like
with Libya?
That's the peace plan Iran rejects? Or was
it the plan they tried to put forward
that they never accepted and they bombed him
in the middle of? This guy's ridiculous, guys.
Keep and they and they vow to keep
the Strait Of Hormuz closed indefinitely?
See, you know these things because you're watching
this show, because we've been continually reporting on
it, because that's not true. Not only did
they not vow to keep it closed, they
didn't close in the first place. What they
said was they will continue to restrict their
access if they continue to conduct this illegal
war and do not give them the basic
concessions they're asking, which is basically no sanctions,
no illegal wars, no more you know, everything
they're doing illegally.
This is what he's putting forward, guys.
And, of course, what he he gives you
the token where he pretends to be mad
about Hegseth saying we negotiate with bombs, but
then still supports everything they do because that's
what honest people do. Right? I simply said,
do you ever get tired of being so
deliberately dishonest?
Probably not.
Chris Mann points out what Sean Hannity had
to say.
He says Trump should not only
but should only make a deal with Iran
If they repay us for all the cost
of the bombs.
I don't even have a word
strong enough.
Or accurate enough for what in the hell
that is. So, you know, I mean, whether
you think we start the war was justified
because of Iran terrorism, that you're going to
literally bomb the hell out of a country
killing civilian people, which is just you cannot
you cannot deny that.
And then argue that you won't stop it
until they pay for the cost of your
bombing. But that then weirdly means that they
will still be there, which he says they
won't allow.
So this is just seems like a you
know, I think it's just kind of the
honestly, people like Hannity, if you wanna cut
to the quick of it, I think is
trying to give Trump the path to whatever
Trump needs. Has nothing to do with the
real agenda. These people are career players, guys.
But I'll let you listen to it yourself.
Oh, a deal with Iran and a permanent
lasting end to this conflict, That would be
a major win, not only for The US,
but for the entire world,
but for a deal to work with Iran,
certain straightforward conditions must be met. One, Iran
must agree to hand over all of that
60% enriched uranium.
Oh, yeah. You know, like they agreed to
already. Right? Like we showed you, which I'll
include again, which you can read for yourself,
which was outlined in the deal that they
blew up when they bombed them on the
twenty eighth. They had a conversation on on
media right there with, was it Face the
Nation?
The foreign minister Oman made it clear. They
agreed to give up all of their rich
material and to literally no longer even have
anymore, which they've never done before. And he
said, this is actually happening. We're actually gonna
have peace. And Israel bombed them that night.
So do you is is handy that stupid?
Do you think you think he's not capable
of doing his due diligence?
I don't know if he would or if
he cares to, but I know he can.
So ask yourself, is this journalist just ignoring
the facts, or is he just lying? Or
is he is he just not aware of
it?
Or the fact that the enriched uranium was
within the safeguards, which he'll continually pretend is
not the case, which, I'll include here with
a little me a little
where was it?
Shoot. Gotta grab real quick. There it is.
I just did this so you guys could
have, like, a one stop spot for it
because I bring it up often. Here's the
link to the a I'll come back to
it. Well, of what, you know, weight costs
lie about 60%, which is all going around
still despite how easy it is to prove
was actually within their safeguard agreements.
Because remember, Witkoff claimed it was they bragged
about it, like it was some kind of
violation. Like, they would even do that when
they're coming to a table about some kind
of an agreement. Like, this guy is so
dis like,
you know, dishonest, but the word coming to
mind would be, you know, deliberately, like, you
know, no like, not just kind of, like,
like, ultimately,
the main thing to realize is is against
US interests. There's a lot of factors to
include in that, but that it is something
obviously hurting Americans and our interests.
And these are the people that are the
meet the like, the between the middleman between
the conversation and Trump.
They must do so immediately.
They must do it, by the way, in
a way it that we cannot allow that
material to get into the hands of the
wrong people. All of it must be turned
over before our military leaves. Oh, to who?
To whom? To the US government? To Israeli
government?
Then totally the not wrong hands. Right? The
only two governments that are actually seemingly willing
to use them on people for no reason.
But, yeah, rush out of the hands of
the people who told you they'll never do
it for no and have never been proven
to do it and for religious reasons say
they never do it and the IAE says
they never have. You know, get out their
hands and rush into the hands of the
people who are killing people right now with
all those weapons
because that's the safeguard.
Number two, Iran must allow anywhere, any place,
anytime,
inspections,
not from any globalist organization like the IAE
that always screws it up. That's wrong. Always
in Iran's favor. Oh, see. Okay. Totally not
at all, by the way. They've been aggressive
against Iran for a very long time. The
only difference is they just never argued that
they were doing the thing that they're not
doing.
And he just hates that, apparently, the facts.
You know? Or Tulsi Gabbard or the previous
administration or everybody anywhere with any insight tells
you they are not doing so. The evidence
doesn't back it up. And how many times
you can show Israel getting caught? Literally, one
example I remember getting caught trying to sneak
material in with the with the IAEA inspection
and being caught in the bathroom and then
going in and testing and finding material on
the bath like, in on the bath,
in, like, the, excuse me, the
jeez. The toilet came talk.
Now that was reported. That came directly from
the IAEA. They said they there was ultimately,
like, radioactive like, somebody flushed it down the
toilet.
I mean, this is crazy. This is the
kind of thing that they do constantly try
to frame Iran. Now that's off the cuff.
Don't take a word for that. But I've
covered this previously, and that was directly from
the, oh, you could even go back to
what is it?
Doctor was it Aman?
Man, it's Frost Aman. I I forget his
name now. The Japanese person that previously was
in the in the position and ultimately
mysteriously died from some turbocancer that came out
of nowhere. I mean and and he was
critical. He was calling out Israel for claiming
they were doing I mean, it's just crazy,
the history. But, anyway, the point is that
you can you can't argue this group is
somehow pro Iran. They've been very aggressive towards
Iran, and they've shown data to back up
what they're saying. These people are belligerent and
just argue that is the case no matter
what the facts show. And if you disagree
with me, then you're on the other side.
That's not journalism.
But the idea that there has been inspections,
even from US entities and The US elements
who've already told you they're not doing that.
What he wants
is the current elements
who are very clearly willing to lie about
everything, and Israel will go right right along
with them. It's not gonna happen.
No. They've gotta be US inspectors.
Iran must also fully agree
to end its nuclear program completely once and
for all. Yeah. So that means they're civilian
level, which everyone's allowed to have included. So
was the other one as well, but that's
not legal. And they've they've always had that.
And by the way, again,
literally already argued they would before Israel bombed
them on the twenty eighth. So this is
just stupid.
They must,
also agree not to build out any ballistic
missiles. Right. So no defense. Well, there's plenty
of other things you can add, but that's
the whole point.
Just no missiles. No ability to defend yourself.
But that's what they've already added to this.
Right? And it's that he doesn't include here.
They've talked about as we just read to
you a second ago. No navy.
Just basically a a a group of people
stuck on land that Israel can manipulate however
they want.
They must also agree to open up the
Strait Of Hormuz Not closed. And they must
agree to repay America
in oil for the entire cost of this
entire military operation. Oh, well, isn't that interesting?
Almost like they spoke about it, and now
they're reporting something that they included that then
Trump claims already happened.
You see what I'm talking about?
Whether it even happened or not. It's almost
like they're making it look like something has
been fulfilled, and so he's gonna go, we
did it.
I weirdly get the sense that might be
where this goes, like, almost out of desperation.
But that's you know, the idea they're gonna
repay you for your illegal war is just
the stupidest thing in the world. But Hannity
has been a career
career
war, you know, whatever, belligerent.
He's a he's a warmonger. He always has
been. These people are always screaming about why
war is necessary against people that we have
no right to be involved with. Like, everything
about this is just disgusting from top to
bottom.
Even if these groups were what they claim,
the point is also still to be made
that why we feel we have the right
to do any of this anyway. But on
top of that, that they're lying about them,
which should matter. Right?
Now here's what he said in another post.
And again, that that I really recommend it.
If you haven't seen it, then you understand
what this is discussing. On the twenty eighth,
then, like, literally, the hours before they bombed
illegally Iran, where you said peace was in
reach, that they said they were gonna give
up all of their rich material.
And they had they they you know, you
could argue they lied about it, but the
ultimate point is they're now demanding it. And
here's the real thing to always remember is
when Trump says they were they were they
they,
they wouldn't say the one thing that mattered,
that they wouldn't refuse to give a bomb.
Well, that's not true. In fact, when he
said that, at that very moment, they were
saying, court, we we're already okay with it.
We're we're agreeing to give it up. So,
again, you could argue that they think they're
lying, but why would then Trump come out
and say they just never they refused to
say it? It's not the same thing. It's
clear. And then now he's coming out and
saying they agreed to not have a nuclear
bomb, but then refused the the ceasefire. I
mean, he's lying about all of this. I
don't see any other option. At least the
idea of some you know,
either either misled or lying would be, I
think, a fair point. So here's what Sean
Hannity also said,
which just blows my mind.
Tonight, Sean, the president has also proved the
I think that's so strange. Up to a
thousand soldiers from the eighty second Air Born
in The Middle East, and it's believed that
if there's a necessity to have ground forces,
say, take Kharg Island, this might be the
first step toward that contingency. Then again, you
could argue that maybe Yeah. But that, you
know, say, you know, I don't know.
Kharg Island, you know, whatever.
Like, this is rare. I don't know who
that one. Clearly, it's either like, there there's
a point people made, by the way, that
it could be that that's something they want
you to think and it's a different island
or you know? But Robert made that case
in the article. Any one of these things
they're gonna go for will ultimately be a
failing action with what our Robert argued with
the what they'll ultimately do in response, and
I agree.
But so Cargillen, though, is one of the
thoughts I had about whether he's talking about
sort of justifying taking that for the oil
conversation.
It's just another way to apply more pressure.
We'll keep an eye on it, but for
now, back to you.
And the most important aspect, Kevin, is obviously
that we The most important aspect is to
always blindly repeat this untruthful statement at the
end of every show. We will not be
handing off to our children and grandchildren
a world where radical
mullahs that chant death to America, the number
one state sponsor You know, unlike saying, you
know, death to Muslims, which is totally okay,
which is all over Israel and apparently the
Republican party today, that's okay, though.
Terror has weapons of mass destroy all is
that chant death to America, the number one
state sponsor of terror. Number one state. And
he goes, like, yeah. Exactly, man. Yes. Yes.
We all repeat those lies. We got it.
Number one state sponsor terrorism even though you
tell us ISIS is the leading terrorism group
and they attack
Iran. You know? But whatever. You know? Or
or that every other terrorist group we can
even point to is Sunni and comes from
the Wahhabis Saudi ruler. But, you know, whatever.
Iran does it because we say so. Because,
you know, you don't don't we claim they're
supporting this group, which you can prove they're
not? Hamas, Hezbollah. It's just it's just like
I I'll say every single time.
You take every allegation they make and pretend
it's all true, even though it's not.
And compare that to what you can literally
prove, even though it's way more than that,
of what The US has done in the
world. It pales in comparison.
But they just do it anyway, guys. Leading
state sponsor of terrorism. It's just lazy. There
is no evidence to back that up. Has
weapons of mass destruction Oh, it's not.
Here we are again. WMDs. We're going in
to get them. Could potentially
create a modern day holocaust. Oh, modern day
holocaust. You mean, like, what they're doing in
Gaza right now? No. No. Not that.
Just I the you know, these are cartoons,
guys. They at some point, hopefully, the world
will get to a place where you can
look back and just be like, wow. Did
this ever happen?
Like, this is the this is what it
looks like at the end of a dying
empire. Like, these people are cartoons.
It's just sad. I mean, look. Like, think
about, like, end of, like, 2008, for example.
Right? What did you see? You got all
of the big time, super important, government supported
economists
saying it's we've never been stronger than ever,
and then everything collapses.
That's the same point. It's exactly what we
do every time or what the, you know,
the power structure does. And half the time,
those people thought they were right because they
bought into the nonsense, guys. It's like the
Iran experts who are experts on all the
lies the state department teaches them, and they
don't even know that they're wrong.
Patrick Henningsen has a good point here about
the lies from the point of the protests,
you know, which we're already well into this,
but let's not forget, they lied about Iran
shooting protesters. They manufactured this by which, by
the way, we've already now proven in three
or four different ways. From, from reporting from
inside Netanyahu's camp, the New York Times article
that covered it, the idea of them arming
the Kurds, the statement of the date they
made before they got there, they planned this
out. They stoked the fake revolution. Now realize
that was that was rooted within a real
protest
that that very quickly they called out, including
the union supporting it as outside forces that
had taken over right in the beginning.
So as usual, they try to coop something
real. It didn't work just like last time,
but they just bull rush in with violence
and just yell the narrative. They do it
every time. And so the reality was very,
very clear. They just
killed people. And and and they said my
point was they admitted. They armed them. They
told you they were arming them. In what
world is that that obviously a crime? And
so Patrick Henningsen has back backing this up
with evidence and research about what he saw
and and the reality of it.
So I met with the police and saw
the evidence of the riots
and the foreign agent provocateurs,
that incendiary element that was injected into the
country by US and Israeli intelligence.
What happened was terrible for the police. Hundreds
of police were killed. Many were burned alive.
We saw the unredacted
evidence of that. The redacted evidence, of course,
was a meant much of it was broadcast
on Iranian national TV, but you didn't see
any of that syndicated in the Western.
Yeah. Wonder why. Is it also funny that
you have people who are always about support
the police who suddenly don't care when it's
just police with a different color skin? Media.
So I can say categorically
that the narrative that Iran massacred
thousands of its own people in these peaceful
democratic protesters is a total fiction. And I
saw plenty of evidence to that effect as
well as reams of burned buses, burned fire
trucks, EMS responder vehicles that were, set on
fire aside from the police that were burned
alive. So there was a real agenda there
to foment
instability and unrest. And then the president, Trump,
then taking to the airwaves saying, this is
your moment. Rise up and take over your
institutions.
It's obvious that was incitement. So for anyone
to say that that wasn't a classic color
revolution, exactly as we saw in Homs in
Syria in 2011 and in 2012,
exactly as we saw in Maidan in February
2014,
and also in Libya, Serbia, Yugoslavia, the list
goes on, Eastern Europe, Belarus. We've seen this
playbook. That's what happened here clearly, but it
was done on a level with resourcing that,
is quite breathtaking in terms of what was
spent on the media propaganda campaigns in the
West, what was spent in terms of Starlink
terminals that were smuggled into the country.
Every time.
I'm telling you guys that. It's it's not
hard to see. It start I mean, Starlink,
he's military contractors, what it is, but they
always give you the feigned, you know, what's
for? We're helping humanitarian.
I mean, there's so many examples where people
suffer in this country, even the you know,
isn't it funny how when when Biden was
in power
and you have the the hurricanes, how they
just couldn't stop talking about how no one's
been and now they just don't care. No
one's being held. There's been disasters where no
one's being helped at all. No Starlinks don't
help. Just such gross hypocrisy,
just feigned humanitarianism, whatever it is. And Starlink
comes into play every time The US is
in in conducting an illegal war, which is
they all are, but war in general. Very
clearly, you can see I don't mean that
by, you know well, you take it however
you want, but the point is that all
their wars are clearly no congressional approval, whatever.
But the point is that you're using these
things as weapons of war under a guise
of humanitarianism. It's what they do.
We also saw evidence of narcotics that were
being distributed.
And I saw that in Syria, by the
way. I was really interested in that point
because how do you get people to act
completely insane and violent? We also saw this
with ICE. I think that's the what? The
Captagon, if I remember correctly, was the name
of the drug. Remind me if I'm tell
me if I'm wrong in the chat. But
that's the the conversation we did talk about
that in regard to Syria where they were
giving people these amphetamines and and different things
to you know, and his point there is
to drive them to be, you know, to
kind of, I guess, maybe immoral.
Like, so, you know, drugged up and not
aware of what they're doing. Certainly possible.
To elements as well. The police there believed
there were amphetamines,
similar types of, drugs, and spice, something called
spice. These types of drugs were all heard
that. That that spy that's that stuff that
made people, like like
like, rip their faces off or whatever. Remember,
like, legitimate. Like, the people, like, lost their
mind and, like, scraped their skin off or
whatever and, like, bath salt kind of stuff.
And same thing. Remind me in the chat
if you have any more information on that.
It's interesting. What does this where was that
spice story from? So distributed and injected into
that. So there's a lot of disaffected youth,
obviously, that got swept up in the mob
violence with very skilled and well trained people
in the back lines shooting police officers from
within the crowd using the crowd as human
shields. And that's when things spun out of
control very quickly, and we saw that sort
of period of about seven days of violence
and instability, which The US and Israel hoped
to capitalize on, but didn't after the Iranian
shut off the Internet,
intercepted a lot of the Starlink transmissions, were
able to track the location of some of
the terminals, and quickly were able to shut
down the organizational,
I think, element. That's that's the impression I
got from the police chiefs that we met
in the main
important? This narrative, the regime or the Mullahs
massacring
the their own people, that's the actual backstop
for manufacturing consent for this war because the
nuclear
conversation has fallen flat on its face. Yep.
Exactly.
Patrick Henningson,
20% rewire.
Just looking that up really quickly. I was
actually conflating that with the with two things.
There it's, rightly pointed out, I think it
was k two. It's like the sent the
synthetic
marijuana, which, if you remember correctly, there was
tons of, like, crazy stuff. People just went,
like, lost their like, there was chemicals sprayed
on it. Excuse me. And it caused people
to, like, lose their minds.
But the ripping of the face thing is
actually a real story, but that came from
two things, flacca, you remember that, and then
the bath salts conversation.
I think all this is kinda part of
the same not to get off on this
tangent, but this part of a similar conversation.
You know? It's like experimentation almost. Like, there's
something you know, you could argue it's just
people trying to trying to make new recreational
things, but something tells me if especially when
you look into the history of where these
things tend to really originate, it comes from,
a lot of times, military stuff. You know,
whether, like, the, like, the,
you know, acid or
what's the other one I was thinking of?
You You know, like MK Ultra kind of
stuff. I mean, that's that's a lot that
that's a history that you should look into.
So the point that Footree just said there
was that they lied, you know, about the
background of that, and he went and saw
it for himself. That's what a journalist does.
Murray says, I won't be lecturing on morality
or lectured on morality by the guy who
had the CIA draw up plans to kidnap
and assassinate Julian Assange Julian Assange and exposing
war American war crimes at four, excuse me,
exposing American war crimes in Iraq. That's Mike
Pompeo
saying the vast majority of Republicans oh, excuse
me. That was confusing for the podcast. I'm
all over the place right now. So Mike
Pompeo said, the vast majority of Republicans understand
that Operation Epic Fury, what they're doing now,
was right is righteous and necessary. Let let's
finish the job.
Murray says, I won't be lectured on morality
by a guy who had the CIA draw
plans to kidnap and assassinate Julian Assange.
And the CBS poll he's highlighting says Republicans
want Trump to end the Iran the Iranian
regime.
Change Iran's leadership leaders to one that are
pro US, 80%.
I it's good. I don't even think that's
true. Most everything I can see is based
on some select grouping of people in the
core. The reality of the conservative conversation or
even just Republican GOP, I think most of
them I mean, they ran on the idea
of this not happening.
I just don't believe that's the reality. But
on top of that, that you're talking about
even if it was, change them to be
pro America, pro US. What how did we
get here? Now, let's be clear. That's always
been what they've been doing.
Always.
Fighting for fruit companies in South America, but
the point is that they've framed it as
humanitarian
or whatever, at least in a for a
long time now. And the idea that we're
just so casually saying, let's just remove them
and put people there that we like.
That's what it's always been, guys, but they're
just doing it on its face now.
And, I mean, that's just destined for failure,
guys. Peep this is going to cause things
to spin out and get I mean, you
could even argue that the illusion well, it
did afford some level of, like, the, you
know,
the like, a set a feeling of of
normalcy or peace. And that's not a good
thing, ultimately, because we're we're being lied to.
My point, though, is that with what they're
doing now, it's just very clearly
you know? Again, I would add, though, that
being seeing it is there's an opening there.
It gives us the opening to go, okay.
Wow. They're doing this. We should do something
as Americans or wherever you're from. We need
to stop that. My point though is that
they're doing it on its face, and my
worry is that it's gonna turn this into,
well, that's just what we do.
Because there's a lot far too many people
who seem to be all kind of pulled
into that mindset today.
We can't this is wrong. And then what
they're doing is I mean, on top of
that, realize that Iran's leaders and what they're
doing and there's just not the truth they're
telling you is not true. So now you're
driving it based on the lies from the
very kind of oligarch globalist that you think
you're fighting.
Assadrad points out that they're now just copying
The Onion.
This is the old an Onion article from
a while ago. Netanyahu calls Iran strikes necessary
to prevent the war he just started. That's
a joke.
Here's the report from March 25. Senator John
Kennedy on Iran. The president didn't start a
war. He's trying to stop a war.
That's just dumb, guys. That's stupid. Obviously, you're
starting you could argue that starting the war
might have stopped a bigger war. That might
see, that's a logical way to say that.
I don't get it.
On arbitrand.
The war to reopen the thing
closed by the war, where they say Pakistani
defense minister is talking about this need the
the war is about trying to reopen the
Strait Of Hormuz,
which, again, is not actually closed if you're
unless you're fighting Iran. It is closed for
you if you're fighting Iran. What was interesting
to me is that how when you how
the world are you gonna as Arnaud's brightly
pointing out,
you you you start the war illegally,
which causes them to close restrict the straight.
And then you now frame the war as
to start open the straight. Like, it just
obviously shows you that they're either clearly fault
failing and now, you know, trailing after this
or that this is just them trying to
mission creep in a way and change the
narrative. But either way, they started it. They
created the very thing they're now fighting. As
always, guys, that's always what it's been. Look
at every other war before us.
And coming to this point again, Spain has
been granted permission through the Strait Of Hermos,
which is not new. Like I've been saying,
they that's just they're making a public case
of saying, yes. Look. You could guess. You're
good. You guys can go through. Why? Specifically
due to their deposition on the war.
Because they've made a statement. They've made it
clear. We're I I don't I forget if
they've said something more severe, but at the
very least, they're saying, we're not involved. Like,
we don't want any part of this. We
don't wanna support what Trump is doing.
But I believe they did make some statements
that were sort of like, you know, this
is not I I I don't wanna misquote
it. But the point was, at least I
know they did make statements saying that we
you know, we're not involved. And so because
of that, Iran's saying, yeah, you're good. Go
through.
Which my point is the more this becomes
aware, real, and seen
and other governments start to recognize that they're
being misled by, you know, if that's really
what's happening, or at the very least, it
just starts being necessity because people need to
get this flowing again, and Trump's plan is
not working, that this is gonna make Israel
and The US
in a terrible position. But in a way,
that creates the justification for them to push
this even further.
But either way you look at it, Iran
is playing this very artfully.
Spain oh, that's the same point. Granted, this
is even as Trump's energy dominance policy is
failing. I Just be clear about that statement.
This is not about some kind of, you
know, praising Iran's government. It's about the reality
that the tactics they've used are clearly working.
It's the same point about with Putin
and the statements about the way he conducts
his politics. He's a he's a very, very
masterful politician.
That's obvious. And he constantly plays these people
in ways that may but that doesn't mean
he's a good guy, not even remotely. But
that's important to see. And it's also important
to highlight that the difference from what we're
staring at with Trump and them is that
they're also just as dishonest, but they're also
just terrible at doing what they're doing.
Now this is another article of Mount Jazira,
Strait Of Hormuz, which country ships has Iran
allowed safe passage to. Now you can go
through this. The simple reality is like I'm
saying. Like, there look. I mean, here's here's
what's crazy. They keep trying to tell you
that it's closed. No one can get through.
But India, Turkey, China, France, Italy, Spain, and
really anybody not adversarial to them right now.
It's pretty simple. They just really need you
to think it's closed. And all of the
dutiful liars out there keep telling you that
it's closed. Iran tells UN nonhostile
ships can go through.
Now you could argue they're lying and trying
to trap people, but, no, there's already evidence
showing
ships going through. Now back to that point
about Trump, is he just trying to pretend
that that's what he was doing?
I'm not sure.
And here's an interesting point. We mentioned this
recently the other day. That this was new
to me as well. I wasn't actually aware
that all these different straits, you know, Suez
Canal and,
what was the other one that was the
one main one?
Like, the Panama Canal, for example, or the
different and different straits.
Almost every one of them in the world
charge fees for ships to go
through. Not that does not happen in the
Strait Of Hormuz. Now you could argue it's
because there's basically two you know, halfway on
the other side, there's another landmass that could
arguably try to control it as well. But
that's not the reality. Iran
very clearly controls secure in a sec in
a security sense, the Strait Of Hormuz. That's
why they've always been trying to change the
dynamic because they knew Iran could do this
the entire for years. They've this is the
point. So it's always been the case. So
understanding that Iran has security control over this
area means that just like every one of
the others that they would have the right
to
claim to have a what does it call?
A a fee, but
maybe, like, what is it called a fee
in here? The,
charge a toll a toll. That's what it
is.
Charge a toll for going through. Now that's
I'm not even saying I agree with it
or not. I'm just saying as a as
a worldwide thing, it's odd. It's sorta like
missiles and everything else. Right? Iran can't because
Iran bad guy. Well, that's not how that
works. Right? And, ultimately, they would have that
right. And so what drops I'd use is
saying, Iran's parliament has moved for toward formalizing
the plan to charge a toll. And that
was actually part of one of the things
in the five points they demanded if to
make the go back to some state of
peace,
or rather just not peace, but, you know,
the
security footing and the restrictions specifically for Zionist
Israel and United States from the Strait Of
Hormuz. They're they would they already made it
clear they'll stop
militarily engaging if they stop. But they've said
for clear they would say we're not stopping
with this because of what you just created
until you forgive us that, if that makes
sense. And so the point
is that one of them was sovereignty over
this control point. And it says the head
of parliament civil commission said Iran is pursuing
legislation to formalize that sovereignty and control and
supervision over the straight.
My point,
watch. It's a prediction.
Now watch as the usual suspects frame this,
and maybe it's already happening, as either unprecedented
somehow, even though it's clearly not, or an
act of terrorism,
even though it seems to be common practice
just about everywhere else. That's just how this
broken partisan game seems to work.
Caroline Levitt comes out and says allies are
lining up behind Trump to open the Strait
Of Hormuz.
You know, the Strait that's not closed at
all or restricted,
but closed is not at all. Closed I
shouldn't say closed not at all, but even
though closed means closed, so technically that is
correct, but it's misleading, It is restricted, as
you all know already.
But allies are lining up.
But are they?
Well, it's from the New York Post, so
I imagine we can take this with a
pound of salt. But if you read through
it, it says over the weekend, The United
Arab Emirates and Australia became the latest to
join the growing list of nations,
now numbering 22, offering their help
to open the strait. Now that's not the
same as saying that Trump tried to start
a coalition of ships to guide ships through,
which everybody denied.
And last I checked, they all said no.
Now what this seems to be trying to
claim is that they're agreeing to it. Now
that's not what I'm seeing right now. But
who knows what happens tomorrow or this on
the twenty fourth, but where it goes. Right?
The point to me is that they're saying
they're offering to help.
Not that they're gonna work alongside Trump to
militarily guide ships through the straight straight, which
is what they kinda want you to think
is happening here. It says six United Kingdom,
France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Japan jointly declared
their readiness
to contribute
to appropriate efforts
to ensure safe passage. That's that's not the
same thing. See, that's the same thing the
UK said.
No. No. That's dangerous. We're not gonna do
that, but we'll we'll we'll seek a viable
alternative.
So they're they want you to they want
clearly Trump not to be mad. They're not
helping, but they don't wanna do the thing
he said. That's what I feel is the
case here. And now this is being framed
sorta like the rest of the lies we're
getting as somehow something that it's not. That's
my sense on it.
It says the Brits have also agreed to
let US forces use their bases to launch
attacks, which by that logic, that now means
they're a belligerent
and probably already were in Iran's mind, but
at this point now, they would be legal
targets in this ongoing
military campaign.
And NATO secretary Mark Rutz says the alliance
is working out a timeline for a joint
response. It says, if Iran would have the
nuclear capability
together with the missile capability, then it would
be a direct threat.
I'm just so tired of this argument. You
mean, like, every other government than and the
ones that are literally committed genocide, and they're
not even seeking nuclear weapons? It's the same
old thing. But this is NATO, which basically
is the US government, if we understand the
reality, an existential threat to Israel, the region,
the Europe, as the stability of the world.
No kidding,
says the totally not objective New York Post.
Iranian leaders following Tehran's launch last week and,
last weekend of two missiles at the joint
US British military base, Diego Garcia, a stunning
2,500 miles away. I don't know why that's
a big deal with these people. This is
a range far longer than Iran's missiles were
supposed to have. Well, they've they're not arguing
they don't have that capability. They're just not
demonstrating what they do have. They've kept it
close to the chest for this reason for
a long time. My argument that they didn't
have that was something The US kinda spun
as, should they cross that line? It's a
big deal, and we terrorism.
It's no different than any other government as
far as I could tell for the most
part. Different levels of reach, but the point
is the same as that they have the
ability or they could. You think Israel has
shown you everything they're capable of right now?
No.
Tehran unilaterally struck out at the Gulf Nations
unilaterally.
That's what this ridiculous platform just said. Tehran
unilaterally
struck out at the Gulf Nations. Oh, you
mean the nations that literally bombed them first
and they responded because they were belligerence?
Inflicting serious damage on their key means of
income, their oil facilities. I mean, you just
can't take people seriously like this.
So so they
unilaterally? In what world are you operating in,
guys? These this means this writer was deliberately
mis deceiving you for the team. That's or
they somehow just don't understand what everybody else
has already seen. How embarrassing. But the point
for me is the idea of this
attack on the base. I wanna remind you
of something that, James James Lee put out.
We'll play that really quickly, which I think
is relevant
about this exact conversation.
A few days ago, we were told that
two ICBMs
were fired at Diego Garcia, which is a
joint US UK military base in the Southern
Indian Ocean. Now the Israeli military very quickly
claimed that Iran fired these missiles and that
they could soon hit Europe, including cities like
Berlin, Paris, and Rome. Prime minister Netanyahu then
tweeted out, quote, I asked the leaders of
the free world, what are you waiting for?
Israel is not only fighting for itself, but
fighting for all of you. But there's just
one problem. Iran says they got nothing to
do with it. And if you read The
Wall Street Journal reporting critically, it said that
one of the missiles failed mid flight, so
it didn't even get there, and the other
may or may not have been intercepted.
So we really have no idea what actually
happened. The US's own intelligence indicate that Iran
lacks the capability of firing any missiles outside
of about 1,200 miles. Now Diego Garcia is
located in the Southern Indian Ocean about 2,500
miles away from the nearest point in Iran,
so something is not adding up here. Okay.
The UK has now publicly come out to
say that there is, quote, no assessment to
substantiate Israel's claim that Iran has long range
missiles capable of hitting London. The NATO secretary
general said they have no evidence that Iran
fired missiles at Diego Garcia. So if that's
really the case that Iran didn't fire those
missiles,
then the elephant in the room, of course,
is
who did. So
if
So, obviously, it's it's, you know, hypothetical. Right?
But it's a fair point.
And with everything else we're seeing with all
the weirdness around this, it's worth asking if
there were being misled. Now that's not to
say, this is the important point, that Iran's
not capable of that. I kinda find that
irrelevant with what I just said in the
first place. Not irrelevant, but just not what
they're making it out to be.
The question though is,
you know, are they? That's still fair. I
I I would argue they I think it's
all worth arguing they are. But then, you
know, they're claiming they weren't. So the question
is, if they aren't, was that fake by
them to make that case? Or even if
they are, was it still driven into reality
so the is US and Israel, right after
they stress why that can't happen, suddenly goes,
look. I told you. We proved that means
they're terrorists somehow because we told you that
that thing can't happen now that it's happening.
Terrorism.
Even though it's not.
You see what I'm saying? It's an interesting
thought. Worth considering that. And especially since this
is something they keep dwelling on. This is
what Trump just said. One missile went 2,500
miles. They supposedly didn't have that. Like, it's
a weird you know, they're they're really trying
to push this in even though, as I
said, it seems
largely And I think we've been proven wrong.
You know, they took
one missile with 2,500
miles. They supposedly didn't have a missile like
that. They had no missile with that capability.
They didn't say that. You see, what do
you mean they're supposedly? Did Israel tell you
that? Is that some was those the state
department Iranian experts? Israel, they never claimed we
don't have that. Not that I can tell.
Why would they? This is a weird way
to frame that. Like, it's about, you know,
they weren't supposed to bomb back. They weren't
allowed to is what you it's like that
say that video where you said they were
supposed to do that. It's like, what is
this? Kindergarten? Like, what do you mean there's
a plan?
It's Israel. That's what it was. They thought
they had a plan. But they shot the
now famous Ireland, the the
Ireland. Uh-huh. That
The UK
was
very
afraid to give us. They didn't wanna get
dragged in, but we don't wanna get dragged
into their wars either.
One thing we're very disappointed, I'll say it
publicly, we're very disappointed with NATO.
It's just something about him is
with NATO, it's just weird. Like, it's just
I don't it's something about him. It's just
sort of like it's almost always performative. I
I don't know. It's hard it's hard to,
like, put a word on, but it just
feels weird. It's like, what what are we
like, what's the game being played right now?
You know what I mean? Like, it's definitely
not what's really happening.
But here here is
one more statement. Actually, let me play this
for I just I've randomly just grabbed this
because I I'm let's let's watch together since
my we're, not too long, but late anyway.
But let's play this since I was just
checking out this as
I was playing his other one.
Here is a clip that I haven't seen
yet. Let's see what James Lee has to
say And the point is it looks like
a fake terror cell he's arguing That ultimately
looks like the argument I can just grab
it actually real quick
Here's the post.
So he says he dug in to the
Islamic movement of the people of the right
hand,
the Iranian backed terror cell that has allegedly
been committing attacks against Jews in Europe this
past month, and this is one he was
able to find.
UK intelligence believes Iran may be behind the
arson attack on four Jewish ambulances in North
London. So what do we know about the
group claiming responsibility online?
Report put out by the Israeli National Center
for Combating Antisemitism,
and they say that this militant group
emerged out of nowhere
and had no known operational history before
this month. Now I find that to be
a little bit odd. The Telegraph also reported
that up until three weeks ago, there was
no entry in any
counter terrorism database. There's no Telegram channel, no
social media footprint, and no history.
Once again, very odd for a supposedly very
dangerous and sophisticated
sleeper group. And to date, the only
news organization that this new sleeper cell
that's allegedly out to
target US and Israeli interests worldwide
has officially spoken to is
CBS News, which is the newly minted Israeli
propaganda album that is run by Barry Weiss,
an Israeli Mossad agent, allegedly. And this detail
is a little bit interesting. They say that,
quote, CBS News spoke to the administrator of
Ashab Al Yameen's Telegram channel who's changed a
series of messages
writing in American
English. Hey. Maybe they use chat, GPT. I
don't know. On top of that It that
usually indicates, guys, that, like, you know, remember
the white helmets and that all that whole
that whole scam.
Vanessa and I many times blabbing,
you know, pointed out how ridiculous it was
that every time they with their their vests
were written in English,
that the things they posted in and and
they and why would that be if they're
a Syrian organization? Because the propaganda was aimed
at Americans.
Simple.
That's the same point with a lot of
these things. It's like, why would that be
the case? Well, maybe it's something else or
maybe it's because they just wanted to make
sure that we were the ones scammed by
this because we're the ones being told we
might have sleeper cells in The United States.
Even though that was I mean, that story
came we already covered that reality or at
the, you know, the reality of that story,
which was basically
hype story based on nothing other than Israeli
intelligence says or the idea
that
their original report that came out was somehow
suppressed by the the Trump White House. I
just the whole thing felt very contrived to
me.
Mint Press News noted that the group had
used some language that they called unusual for
a Muslim group, specifically
referring to Palestine
as the land of Israel. But it actually
gets
according to the international Oh, god. It's so
stupid. Terrorism.
They say that the Arabic inscription beneath the
group's logo includes multiple mistakes,
including the misspelling of the word Islamic.
Seriously, they misspelled Islamic in the logo? And
there's a little bit more. Okay? The ICCT
also found that there were a number of
inconsistencies
in their Telegram account.
Foremost, the misspelling of the Arabic channel name
likely resulting, they say, from an incorrect English
translation.
Come on. This is too much, man. Like,
yeah. I don't know for sure whether this
is or isn't a legit
Iranian sleeper cell organization,
but let me ask you. What is more
likely that they would commit a bunch of
these misspellings and typos of a language they're
supposedly proficient in or maybe,
just maybe,
this is all a big psyop.
I mean, it's just wild.
I mean, that's where I I like I
said, that's I hadn't seen that. That's just
the idea. And
because that's the case, make sure you do
your due diligence, guys. But the interesting point,
you know, the I and this is something
that I've heard, you know, the the the
statement of the group and so on, but
I haven't gone too deep. But the point
about this is that you could have the
the mistakes. I mean, what what does that
sound like to you? With what we continue
to see out there, what kind of propaganda
does that feel reminiscent of? Of the kind
of flailing, like,
three different styles of the same argument at
the same time, and you could depict which
one you like. You know, this is just
lazy, guys, and I don't understand why this
is, like, genuinely, don't understand why that would
be the case. Are they not capable of
doing it? Do they want you to see
that at that rate? I I don't know.
That's just I just I guess somebody says
I'm just I'm tired in the chat. I'm
just incredible where we are and how ridiculous
it all is.
Let's not forget the age of fifth generation
warfare. That's what we are in, and that's
something that they've been telling with their dancing
army videos, with their weird ghost mask. I'm
like, they're they're telling you we're in this.
Drones, fog, false flags, and political destabilization.
That was a show we did on January
2025. Remember that Cybertruck blowing up in front
of Trump Tower and all the different I
mean, it's just sigh up or sigh up
or sigh up?
Now Saeed,
Abbas Aragachchi,
the foreign minister of of Iran, says The
US backed Israel Israel The US backed Israel's
Gaza blockade,
cutting aid under security claims, yet condemns Iran
for defending itself in the Strait Of Hormuz.
Double standard. Israel's crimes are okay while Iran's
defense against aggressions is condemned. International law is
not a tool of convenience. Now look, you
can argue he's a terrorist. You can disagree
with everything he has to do, but you
the statement is fact. No matter what you
think,
you you could write that anywhere you want,
and it would be fact. Doesn't matter who
says it. It's real. I mean, the obvious
reality of that, and what they started wasn't
a war of aggression. They they're illegally started.
I mean, everything about it. It's not about
size. That's simply the truth.
Now Pepe Escobar
writes something important here. He says they're going
for Larac in regard to the islands, a
small island from where the IRGC Navy watches
the tankers who paid the straight for most
toll
and arguably where they might be, like, kind
of able to lob out, but there's a
lot of places they could do that. It
says Kharg Island is a diversion.
It's too far away.
So option two would be Abu Musa, the
West to the West of Hormuz,
with the help of The UAE.
The consequence, Iran turns The UAE to dust.
Now what's important is Robert made this, you
know, the the discussion about or the made
the point about
any of the islands and how that might
work out. Oh, she I'll grab that for
you in case you wanna read it.
And then we can wrap up for the
most part here.
Robert put this out. It's a good article.
Here. It's right down here.
Or it should be. What?
Oh, man. I gotta get this line updated.
There's been some weird stuff going on with
the background.
Well, it should be right there. Oh, well,
here it is up top.
They're
like I've been saying, I'm just dragging my
feet because there's a lot going on. We
will be updating this
and revamping some stuff. Not necessarily because I
want to, just because it's long story. Things
that we or we kinda got trapped with
with our old terrible people that work with
for the website stuff and are now we
have to because things will end up starting
having problems.
But strategic failure. Trump's contradictory Iran strategy un
unravels.
And by the way, the reason I said
that, by the way, is just be aware
that we're be aware that there's gonna be
some, you know, visual changes and so on.
But this is an important article. They did
a good job breaking down. Now you can
read here's the one I was talking about.
Her moose is closed only for Zionists. That's
that seems that's our our gotchi.
But
he gets into the point of the islands
where you can read it. It's a it's
a well well thought out argument. And so
his point again back to Pepe Escobar was
simply that, you know, with The UAE might
would be, at least in regard to this
island, Abu Musa, The UAE would have to
help, and the consequence would be them being
turned into dust, bombed. Right? Well, as it
turns out, The UAE as rejects it says
UAE rejects ceasefire with Iran, demands Tehran's full
threat network be dismantled first. Ambassador, you know,
basically just sides with The United States publicly,
also reaffirms a staggering 1,400,000,000,000.0
UAE investment commitment in The United States.
And as
George Galloway says, they're committing national suicide.
Seems to be a common opinion.
But who's to say why? Maybe they're not
in control, which is kind of what I
think about these governments right now. But either
way, just recognize that this is going further.
Despite the Trump claiming we made a deal
already or it's over. It was done on
day one. Right? But, you know, not at
all.
Now here's Vance trying to convince you that
somehow these are all terrorists and that, you
know, we can't have let them have a
nuclear bomb because they might have a nuclear
bomb vest.
I mean, they're grasping at straws right now,
guys. And the all this is what the
bull work wrote. The Vance suggest Ron could
have used nuclear suicide vests. Oh, well, then
he just quotes it. We'll I'll play it
for herself.
Or I thought I had it. I guess
not.
And then I'll play one after this that
I think is important
that you've seen.
Let's see.
Okay.
So the reason he's saying this though and,
like, the it it
I just it's a it's a bad argument.
Because the idea of a nuclear suicide vest
is a little bit
I mean, if it's even possible, which I'm
sure it is today, it's just it's not
it it goes a little bit beyond just
what it what anybody could do anywhere, and
I just think it's an extreme with the
limitations of the enrichment. I mean, everything. It
just all it's doing is trying to convince
you that these are just monster terrorists and,
you know, and that's that's the argument. You
know, you could you could make that argument.
We can't let them have silverware because, you
know, you could just go ridiculous, but they're
terrorists. Therefore, it all makes sense. You know?
So the idea of just the the suicide
vest is just to make it into some
hyperbolic argument. Why would that be the case?
Well, because of terrorists. Why wouldn't they just
bomb you? Right? Because they're terrorists. Like, that
that's there's there's no logic to it. And
in fact, Iran has not had previous history
of doing what you're claiming. Even when you
when you get into, like, the roadside bomb
conversation, they're talking about IDs, and that's largely
because of the I mean, you know, it's
the same story, guys. But either way, here
is
if I can find it again.
Where was that?
There there we
go. Say options. I think it's important the
American people know. Options for what? And it's
options to ensure that Iran never has a
nuclear weapon. You talk about people You know,
that that, you know, he starts with the
options. Like, they're talking about right now, like,
we're deploying troops, and we're doing all we
need options to make sure they don't have
nuclear weapons. The thing the one thing that
we all seem to know the evidence does
not suggest or that you guys know the
IEA said is not there or that Gabbard
told you as state. I mean, just ridiculous.
At what point can we I mean, realize
that what we're saying is all of the
evidence says it's not there, but we just
are gonna tell you it's there anyway. We
just know.
But your intelligence says otherwise. Well, yeah, we
don't care what the intelligence says, even though
that's what you always tell us what what
matters. Right? Well, what what you're listening to
Israel then. Okay. That makes sense.
So you are being played by Israel if
you play if you look at it that
way. You walk into a crowded supermarket and
have a vest on, and they blow up
the vest and a couple of people get
killed, and that's a terrible tragedy. What happens
when what's on the vest is not something
that can kill a couple of people but
can kill many, many tens of thousands of
people. Well, that already exists. It's called a
bomb, guys. I mean, what are you talking
about, man? Well, if you want and again,
you wanna make it into a nuclear conversation,
again, it's it's it's just this is irrational,
the way he's framing this. That is the
most important American national security objective that exists
for any administration at any time is you
don't want the worst people in the world
to have a nuclear weapon. That's Right.
Because you guys are doing this. And because
Israel's clearly able to have nuclear weapons and
because plenty of other countries that are far,
far, far, far less
dem demonstrably dangerous based on their actions in
the world than Iran have nuclear weapons.
North Korea, for crying out loud. But, yeah,
this is what you like, think about that
statement and then ignoring that North Korea has
nuclear weapons.
It's just it's a joke, guys. These are
not serious people. They're manipulators.
And to understand that the very point of
these kind of vests and the idea of
this stems from Zionism. Well, I mean, certainly,
the Zionists have used it and brought it,
in fact, to the area. Terrorism as we
know it today, the planting of bombs in
marketplaces and so on and so forth, was,
in fact, introduced into the Middle East by
the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
first third of the twentieth century
unacceptable status in The Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state, which now exports more
arms and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
Now
we're gonna end with some points that back
that up about what Israel is doing in
the world today. But first, I won't get
include this for you guys to check out
the idea of what they're claiming. Right? The
60%
that Witkoff told you they bragged about. Well,
that on that point, the IAE
IAEA
director general addressed that stating that Iran's uranium
stockpiles remained under safeguards in accordance with their
safeguard agreement. Literally, the 60% that he claimed
right there.
Here's the document. You can read it for
yourself from the director general.
It's like, that's my point, is that you
can keep yelling, they have the bomb. Well,
that's not what anybody anywhere says that is
in a standing position to make that case.
You guys are just lying.
And now what we're gonna this is we're
being reported
that the bombings that took place in Iran
were also elements that were dropped that were
mines,
claiming that they were, what they say, electromagnetic
mines, I guess.
Not familiar, but the point is that this
is being pretty widely reported, so it's something
you should consider. Now it's also possible that
Iran did this to themselves. I just don't
see how that makes sense. But anybody's capable
of, you know, doing something to create a
situation where you can justify that you were
attacked. My point is, though, not that they're
not capable of that, but why would that
make sense right now? They're already being illegally
attacked. They don't need to create other justification.
They're using cluster munitions. They're using white phosphorus.
They already are doing all those things. Right?
So this is on top of that. And
the allegation is they're dropping mines in civilian
locations.
I I don't I it's not hard for
me to believe this is happening with what
they've always done.
Here's another example, and you even have them
there's actually multiple reports from different news agencies
on the ground showing you. But like I
said, you could argue Iran did it. Right?
But I don't believe that. At least just
because of the logic of it, not that
they're not capable of it. Another war crime
by the US military. Explosive packages have been
dropped throughout the city.
You know? And this is my point. This
is not Gaza. There's
people. There's people phones, news news agencies. And
if you're just gonna argue that literally everybody
in Iran is a lying, deceiving person like
you tried to claim about Gaza, well, you're
disgusting. That's not true.
And, also, I thought you were trying to
save them. Right? How's that work out? The
people who run Iran are religious fanatics,
says a religious fanatic. Looking at who at
what they're doing. Oh, what's that? What's that,
Rubio? Attacking embassies, hotels. Imagine what these people
would do if they had a nuclear weapon.
They just can't stop.
You you have to realize these three people
are some of the most radical people in
the world if you really understand what's going
on,
especially the two sitting by
him. Like, radical, like, alarmingly, guys. He is
literally a religious Zionist who is screaming about
Armageddon. He's telling our own military this is
for the end times. I don't know why
that is not the end of the conversation.
But, yeah, keep telling us, Rubio, about how
Iran is bombing civilian locations.
He goes, that's what he's claiming. Unlike them,
we're hitting military targets.
US Israeli attacks have already hit 281
medical centers and 498
Iranian schools.
Widely reported, by the way, and I already
reported on myself, the very first attack, they
came out with a 175
murdered children.
And everyone's admitted that essentially now. The US
reporting has come out. Hegseth put a map
out that showed you that. Even Israel blamed
The United States. But, yeah, well, keep telling
us about how that's I mean, it's just
broken, guys.
Drop site news, however, reports that Iran is
striking
chemical locations where the US government and Israel
are making white phosphorus.
See see see the difference? Now our our
you could argue that there is plenty of
other crimes happening. I just don't believe that
that's the reality of the way it's going
down, not because they're not capable, but because
it's there's no justification
or rather, you know, in their minds for
why that will be in their interest. And
they don't need to do that right now.
But I could be wrong, of course, and
question it.
Trump says Iran's war Iran war to last
four or five weeks, but, you know, could
go far longer.
Sure. Why not?
Brian Grim, again, points out Israeli media reporting
that Netanyahu expects ceasefire announced this Saturday. Translation,
ground invasion comes this weekend. I certainly hope
not, but I agree with his logic. And
he follows up by saying, source tells him
that the naval special warfare teams were also
given deployment orders yesterday, and this was on
the twenty fifth, as well as a bunch
of tier one operators.
That plus the eighty second airborne deployment plus
Netanyahu's obvious faint pretending that they expect a
ceasefire, which he's done many times,
suggests that all the pieces are in place
for yet another ground invasion.
And what's crazy is he's probably right, guys,
because they do the same thing every time.
I guess we'll find out.
Now to the point of where terrorism stands
to stem from in the world, let's make
sure we understand this on the way out.
K? This is just a quick little glimpse
of what they're doing in the last twenty
four hours, and it's all over the world,
and it's just blatant blatant human rights violations,
crimes, torture, terrorism.
Here's Mike Huckabee, though, you know, the America
First, Mike Huckabee, who wants you to believe
that, you know, we just haven't programmed the
youth properly to believe what Israel is.
But where does that come from?
You know, there's a difference between dumb and
ignorant.
Dumb is that a person cannot process information.
They just don't have the capacity. They don't
have an operating system if I put it
in computer language.
Ignorance is that the data isn't there. What
we're dealing with is not an operating system
problem. It's a data problem. Right. We have
not downloaded the proper data, the correct, the
true data into the minds of younger people.
For example, that they're not committing a genocide.
For example, that, you know, is that Judaism
is Zionism. For example, that they have a
right to all of the land everywhere, as
he even told Tucker Carlson. Right? That's that's
the that's the right information that you need
to be programmed with in computer language, of
course. And that's that's what he wants for
America first, Trump's administration,
is for American kids to believe that Israel
has the right to rule over the world
and for Israel. I mean, this is what
they're yelling out loud,
and this guy believes.
I've talked about this for this guy is,
like, a a,
ardent Zionist. Like, Alex, very passionate about it.
And, yeah, if you haven't seen his discussion
with Tucker, I don't even know why they
allowed him to do that. It'll blow your
mind. This is the opposite of America first,
and Tucker Carl called it out himself.
And then we got booted off.
Hold on. Now I gotta set everything back
up again. Get the camera back.
Here we go.
Welcome to the last American bag, Bond. If
you haven't been here, we we get this
happens to us every other show, it seems,
with a direct connection and fiber. Let's let's
keep going. Almost done anyway.
Let's see where we were. Okay.
So back to the point.
Mike Huckabee's explanation for why young Americans hate
Israel. We simply haven't programmed them with the
youth correctly. Now, however, they put that in
quotes and that's not what he said. So,
typical. Oh, I hate that that's happened on
the plot, but everyone seems to do that
these days. Don't do it because you're you're,
you know, making it seem that's what he
said. He didn't say that. But that's what
he meant. And I I agree with that.
But here, as Assadrad points out, are Western
media outlets going to report this, or are
they gonna still pretend it's a ceasefire? Well,
guess what? Israeli army carries out air strikes
on tents, sheltering displaced Palestinians
in Gaza Strip
despite The US back east fire. But remember,
they don't care about that. They're bombing Lebanon.
They're bombing Gaza. They're also bombing Iran during
a supposed point, guy. This is what they
do. But realize they're bombing tents.
There's not even there's no denying that, guys.
This is a they're not even claiming this
is some kind of operation. They're bombing
random tents full of people in a con
in a
what am I trying to what's the word
I'm looking for? A,
jeez,
you know, in a in a place in
a refugee camp. There it is. I mean,
this it's just so crazy to me that
we can't be real about what these people
are. And I'm talking about the Israeli government.
They're literally choosing to just
just randomly murder a bunch of people in
tents.
And no. They're not even they're not, like,
pray they're not talking about it. They're not
going, we just killed terrorists. There's they don't
they they don't they're wanting to make sure
we don't look. They're taking advantage that we're
focused somewhere else and murdering
innocent starved people.
Yeah. And then every other day after that,
by the way, and every other day before
it. Doesn't stop.
Here, Alan McLeod points out what Sky News
is reporting. Palestinian teenager was starved in prison
before death.
Judges rule
in Israel.
Oh, by the way, starved by whom? Right?
Doesn't say. Guess we'll just have to guess.
Palestinian teenager starved in prison before death. Judge
rule.
Great great job, Sky News. It's sort of
like New York Times and all the rest,
how it becomes some kind of, like, ambiguous
reporting when it happens. I mean, Israel is
involved. And, also, let's realize that almost every
time this happens, they the the judge like
this, they could rule that he died in
Britain, then no charges come out. No one
goes to jail.
Same thing here.
Zachary Foster. UN experts demand Israel release prominent
Gaza doctor after reports of severe torture. Yeah.
That's no that's 03/25/2026,
guys. That's right now.
Oh, Oh, you you did you you think
that that was over? Do you think they
were the hostage no. That's not over. As
Zachary Foster rightly points out, no. No. We
stopped hearing about the hostage crisis because all
of the hostages were Palestinian.
Right? The only one that are left are
Palestinian, so they just stop talking about it
because the only thing they ever cared about
was Israelis, apparently. Not even the Americans that
got killed and died and never got rescued
from inside of Gaza, like we report in
the very beginning. That they they apparently never
left.
I show there was a woman from Chicago,
not not some dual citizen, Americans that live
there, not like it should matter more.
And they they never helped.
They they service helped, did everything they could
to help the Israelis. Right? But think about
that. The America First administration let them die
or rather
the either one of them really if you
look at it. But the point is that
clearly, they don't care about these Americans or
in Trump's current,
which one was it? Yeah. No. It was
this. It was the the current this overlap
from Biden to this one, And it was
the American citizen that was being held in
Israeli, and nobody cared
and tortured. Lost, like, 50 pounds. And just
it never stops, guys. And that's not America
first, is it? It's not they don't care
about Americans first, clearly.
Here, Israel's launching a genocide against Lebanese people
during the supposed hold on bombing even though
it's not happening. They literally drop pamphlets saying
they're going to destroy Lebanon like they did
Gaza. It literally says
what we're going to do is gonna be
like Gaza.
And that's that's the whole but they drop
pamphlets, guys, like Lindsey Graham. That's the difference.
They drop pamphlets. And half the time they
drop pamphlets, it says, we're gonna bomb it
in three hours over here. And then in
forty seconds, they bomb right where they are.
Not making that up, by the way. I've
seen many examples of them literally doing that,
and that's been reported by UN, like, people
who are from an international level. I mean,
this has been covered broadly. I've covered this
many, many times, and the points they drop
these things. Like and look in the very,
very beginning. What was one of the first
things we saw and reported on? Even this
was from the UN. They bombed the Egyptian
crossing when they started to cross. It's the
same thing every time. I this we have
to be honest about that. Mass grave at
Al Shefa. This is 02/24/2026,
which we knew was just another one. One
of a 126
mass graves holding hundreds of civilians.
Victims of the genocide according to the EuroMed
human rights group.
This is it's not a secret, guys. They
murdered all these people, and they buried them,
and then tried to cover it up. Now
that they're able to show it, people can
see it.
Sarah points out, it's horrifying. Paramedics in South
Lebanon are forced to choose between saving lives
or staying alive.
Why? Because they're currently doing double taps all
over the place. It's just exactly what we
just reported.
As Glenn Greenwald pointed out, it's been going
on for decades. They literally bomb a location
full of civilians, and then when these medical
people rush in, they bomb even more.
It's a it's a tactic. It's on purpose.
It's a horrible war crime.
Here is the Israeli member of Knesset
saying on the killing of the Palestinian family
in Jenin, which just happened,
quote, there are no innocent civilians in Jenin,
no innocent children. I support IDF soldiers in
every situation, even in the cost of children
or women.
Yeah. Normal stuff. Right? Just the normal everyday
March 25 statements from Israeli politicians. Every child's
a terrorist, kill them all. You know, normal
stuff. Here's Blakely
showing a video we've shown before.
This guy is saying, in the maternity ward,
300 terrorists were born.
Interviewer says, well, they're children, not terrorists. And
he goes, no. No terror. They're yes. They're
terrorists.
This is Amit Halavi
from the Israeli Knesset.
I mean, yeah, I've played all of it
for you guys, and these are very real
and verifiable. I just wanna make sure you
understand who we're actually dealing with in case
you haven't seen it.
Now just a quick wrap up point. Drop
site news reported that New York Times investigation
raises serious questions about a March 6 airstrike.
Remember when Mark when, Hegseth told you he's
now bombing narcoterrorism on land? And I I
talked about this. And it's after they started
the whole weird Christy Nome
sort of Shields of America thing, and they
pretended that started some kind of focus on
the land. Well, they just kept bombing ships
in the water too, and they just tried
to pretend like it was part of some
coordinated plan.
Well, guess what?
The US said it bombed a drug camp?
Turns out it was a dairy farm. I
mean, this is being widely reported, guys. And
were innocent people, families, a dairy farm?
The target, according in New York Times, appears
to have been a 350 acre cattle farm
with dairy farm in San Martin.
Farm workers, including a 32 year old carpenter,
Miguel, who owns a farm. I mean,
what do you think? Do you think they
just are that stupid or that belligerently
incompetent or they just don't care? Or just
well, they get played by somebody else. I
I don't get it.
We we we either gotta start acknowledging this
as people who actually care about what we
pretend we are in this country and what
we can be,
Or I guess we just give up because
I don't know how in the world and
you know that's not what I think. Because
I don't know how we can pretend that
this is not happening in real time all
around the world, and it is literally turning
people against even us, by the way, as
individuals.
When you wonder why people say death to
America,
why they might be feeling that way. And
even then, they still make it clear. Look.
We're talking about the government. And, honestly, if
you wanna step back from that and realize,
like Iranians, I find it strange even because
of that, but they seem to have a
very positive opinion of Americans. And I'd like
to believe it's because of people like us
and because that's the majority from people looking
in, that there's a lot of us going,
woah.
This is not this is crazy. And that's
why I keep calling out that most people
are seeing through the partisanship.
Most people are beginning to question this stuff.
Time to start recognizing that, guys, because we
have an opportunity.
And this is and, clearly, they're trying to
destroy that opportunity and everything else with it
and everybody else around it no matter what.
You know? And it's just sad. It is
so obviously influenced by the very people. I
mean, it's like we what do we need
to convince people of? That they're not, you
know, the the the genocide is not somehow
that it's only over there that they're committing
genocide. It's only in that one location that
they rape people.
You know? Or it's just it's so obvious
what we're dealing with. And, again, I think
the world has come to terms with that.
It's about whether we can do something about
the structure here
that doesn't seem to care.
Never calling for violence. Never.
But doing something is clearly necessary.
So thank you for tuning in today.
My my plan will be to not work
tomorrow, but I guess we'll see what happens
with whatever goes on in the world. But
thank you for tuning in. Appreciate your support.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.