US can't articulate
what their political objectives. And if the political
objective is regime change, and that seems to
be the underlying commonality
between statements from Israel and The US, if
we triangulate it, we say it's probably
regime change. And what matters is the political
objectives,
not the military objectives. The military objectives are,
as Klaus Schwabisch would say, the war is
an extension of politics by other means. There
has to be a political idea or not
an object that they're pursuing. Otherwise, it's just
kill your way to to victory. And that
has proven to be a failing
war strategy throughout history. And, specifically, we could
look at Israel and Gaza. Well, they might
think it's fine in terms of the ethnic
cleansing and and the genocide of the native
Palestinian population. That's it might be acceptable from
an Israeli point of view, but they haven't
defeated Hamas, and they've lost their standing in
the global community. So many would view that
as a loss. So The United States is
trying to adopt Israeli type total warfare,
siege warfare, maximum pressure, maximum suffering, as Pete
Exat said, death and destruction all day long.
It's hard to say where we're at with
this. If this is just gonna continue, they're
gonna continue to incur costs in terms of
their relationships
with all of their allies in the region.
And that's really what matters because The US
can't project power without the cooperation
of all of the Gulf States, Saudi Arabia,
Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, UAE,
Jordan, Bahrain, and Iraq as well.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Monday, 03/23/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
One important article that I think is gonna
change a lot of people's perspective on this
today.
And it's not because of the article itself
or the location it came from, New York
Times, but because of how obvious this has
been the entire time and because of follow-up
information we're gonna add to it and things
that we've discussed right up until now. But
I thought this was an important piece in
the way it came out and the timing
of it and what it really articulates.
And it's it's You know, we should always,
whether it's left or right, up or down,
New York Times, Fox, New, doesn't matter, we
should question all of it. And always consider
that they could be lying, could be wrong,
as always. The reason I'm saying that is
because I don't want anyone to think that
be, you know, as usual,
partisans tend to perceive it as trusting one
source or the other. And then we all
have to get away from that if that's
the way we view it. But the point
is that this is coming from internal sources,
from the White House, from people in the
diplomatic situation,
and really just adding contextually what we already
knew what was going on that this entire
time. And the reason it's so important is
not just, you know, the
dynamic during the so called negotiations
and who was pulling what and who was,
you know, driving what force. Ultimately, Iran being
told they were going towards peace. It turns
out that wasn't the case.
But really, the the,
I get like I said, the, like, the
few weeks, even months leading up to that
as well as what happened right afterward. And
you'll come to find that it's very, very
clear. We pointed out the things like the
Kurds and the funding that went on there,
not a new story for the US government.
We talked about The US is the Israeli
government admitting publicly in interviews elsewhere that this
was decided. The date they bombed Iran was
decided weeks at least before they got there.
That means they were,
under the guise of negotiations for peace, killed
the group that met in Iran, just like
in Lebanon, just like Soleimani.
It's not secret. In fact, it's exactly what
they did during the last so called twelve
day war. This is what they do. Very
important to understand this, and this only continues
to flesh out not only that that happened,
but who was pulling those strings.
What what element, as I'm sure you could
decipher, was really telling certain groups, Trump included,
what was going to happen, how it would
play out. And if we just push this
the right way, if we just yell this
thing at the right time, who cares if
it's all lies? We'll get this the way
we want it. And on top of that,
the real core point is the idea that
Iranian people wanted any of it. And this
is not new. If you followed this the
entire like,
I I say that the last American vagabond
as a platform since we've been doing this.
We've covered the false Iranian revolutions many times.
And I don't mean the fact that there's
not potential revolution or protest within the government,
in the country. Those are always real. And
any country, you can find that. It's how
they're manipulated and abused and turned into the
opposite of what the people on the ground
wanted. Happened over and over and over. And
many times, they're caught doing it. And a
little bit of time goes by, a new
president's in place, and suddenly, it's like we
can't well, we all seem to remember. But
I think what average people and most of
the media independent are starting to see is
that the mainstream is always lying. They don't
even have any surprised they can tie their
shoes in the morning, and then they're being
fed what to say. And then you got
this new mainstream apparatus alternative side that is
doing the same thing. But we're all going,
okay. Yeah. This is just the same old
cycle. We'll end with a good video from
Decensored News showing you how this is identical
to the Iraq war rhetoric.
A good long clip showing you identical framing.
But that article alone is just one more
perspective, more evidence, more source material showing you
what we already know, that this is being
driven by a foreign power. And it and
you could look at it one of two
ways. In my opinion, with the facts that
we have, either that Trump is being played,
which just because he's being played does not
mean he's the guy you all hoped he
was. We can consider that. I think there's
plenty of other evidence that shows that he's
been a a willing participant in a lot
of this. And, ultimately, even within
allies manipulating people, they play themselves, or rather
each other, I mean. And we always see
that. There are because when you're a sociopath,
as I would see it, or just a
shameless profiteer opportunist, you're gonna take your opportunities.
You're gonna profiteer for yourself because that's what
they're all trying to accomplish, I think. And
then for the larger agenda we're always discussing,
even within the groups, you see variations that
they disagree on. So consider that even if
this was,
you know, Trump wholesale played about how this
would go down, consider that he already has
plenty of other things he's shown you that
that demonstrate his interest to ignore what he's
promised you. But if it makes people out
there feel better to consider that he's completely
snowed or that he somehow worked his way
into this terrible situation to save you from
within, as Glenn Beck and Alex Jones Jones
seemed to be from whole cloth making up
because it sounds better and makes you feel
good,
consider it. I did. I don't think there's
any evidence to back it up. And if
we can prove that, I'd love to find
that out, to find out that he is
actually maybe the person you want him to
be. Why would I not want that? The
problem is the facts don't back that up.
And it's getting more and more clear every
single day that we go forward on this.
So what we're gonna get into is obviously
the awareness around all of that and what
has happened since and a lot of lies
that are being spun. And, of course, one
main point, which is the secondary large point
we're gonna talk about today, pretty much the
latter half of the show, is the idea
of the so called discussions that were just
had. We're gonna go through the really embarrassing
timeline of just the last week where Trump
says, they're no deal except total surrender. Oh,
they were gonna obliterate them entirely, or you
have two days to do x, y, and
z until finally going, oh, none of that
meant anything. I either lied or I was
inaccurate, And now we have talks ongoing. That's
up and you know, was preceded by multiple
days of Iran saying not even happening. No
possible not possible. They've lied to us every
time. Deals aren't happening. Now that doesn't mean
it's not. Obviously, maybe they found someone within
the government they could speak to. That's possible.
Look at Venezuela.
We're gonna get into the evidence about that
and whether or not there was a conversation
and whether or not Trump was all bluster
and just made up a story to make
it look like he didn't well, like, that
they didn't call his bluff or whether there's
somebody inside they're actually dealing with, and this
may fall tomorrow. But there's a lot going
on within this story that's,
as usual,
interesting and hard to read. But I think
it's important to go through it all to
understand where they may really be and whether
the United States government is in a much
weaker position than it wants people to think.
We're also gonna start with a couple points.
Shout out to Patrick Henningsen from that opening
clip. We don't often we don't reference twenty
first Century Wire and Patrick enough. They do
excellent work. Make sure you're following them. Just
a really great clip to kinda break down
the thought of what's the real goal here.
The the just murder to the endpoint as
our how we frame that is exactly what
we're seeing right now. And even if that's
the goal and you think that the endpoint
will still be good, how in the world
have we allowed that framing?
That's that doesn't align with what anyone in
the world pretends they are, let alone the
US government.
But here we are. Murder and and destruction
and power is all we care about. Just
take Greenland because they're not strong enough to
keep it, the leading adviser of the White
House seems to tell people.
You know, and and I think it's ultimately
about more than that, but I think it's
important to see that this is this is
being driven by something other. And I think
that's what's rung true for me in that
other than US interests, and I think most
people are starting to see that. Now, again,
shout out to his work. I'll include that
so you guys can check that out as
well. But we're gonna start with a couple
of important things today. One is something going
on with Twitter.
Or rather, yeah, I mean, pretty much just
Twitter itself, but specifically something I think goes
beyond the platform. And then we're gonna talk
about the Save Act and some lies around
that, and, we've been focusing on that for
a while or rather just discussing it. There's
some points I want you to see. You
already know the basic reality of what I
think that core point is. There's a lot
to get into with now the Save America
Act. And we've talked about almost every part
of that in one sense or another over
the years or just even just this administration,
to be honest, with the DHS and so
on. But the Save Act part with the
Real ID discussion, we'll briefly point to again,
is one of the most important parts in
my mind, at least in what I think
they're trying to accomplish with that, which is
why they started it as the Save Act
alone with really that focal point, And then
just kinda folded it into a larger bill.
Because so the the the it now the
point is that's how these tend to work,
where they get folded in behind something else.
We'll get to the shutdown TSA argument. It's
the same conversation in the sense of how
it's being used. Before we get to that
and then get into the main point today,
this is something I want you to see
because I'm actually really frustrated. I'm actually mad
at myself for not having brought this to
to to discuss
last week when I first picked up on
this. And it's it's a combination of that
it's at that time, it didn't seem like
a super important story, and I wasn't sure
exactly what it was. Even still, not really.
But also that there's a ton going on.
And every day, I'm balancing what I think
will be important. And some days, things turn
out to be randomly important that you wouldn't
have expected before. So right now, and I
hope you guys are listening to this because
this applies to everybody using this platform,
be very careful what you are engaging with.
And frankly, this is a lesson for life,
whether it's on your cell phone,
anything, email, you should not be engaging with
things that you don't recognize. Today, I think
it's called NoClick
spyware. Israel's being the leading in the world
on that. Surprise, surprise. You don't even have
to engage with these things half the time.
Just look just having it on your phone,
it's already too bit too late. That's not
I shouldn't even say that. That shouldn't that
shouldn't be the reason why you just engage
with everything anyway. That's the wrong mindset. But
on Twitter,
weirdly, and I shouldn't even say it like
that, perfectly timed with the update on the
message app side of this. And you know
what I think about this, and I shouldn't
even say think. Authentix,
CHQ, these are Israeli intelligence connected things that
are basically running the back side of this
platform in regard to your identification,
now your messages, the the bot element that
they told you they were fighting, which the,
was I think it was Censored Man, basically
proved, and I've I've went through it extensively.
I think it's very clear, was this was
the solution to the bots, which ultimately just
flooded the market with Israeli bots or their
propaganda.
All that aside,
what we're seeing, that was all my opinion
about the timing and so on, was that
suddenly people were getting these notifications. I got
them. I got, I think, like, six or
seven over the last over the first couple
of days. And people said, hey. I just
I wanted to share this with you. I'm
running for a podcast cohost position, and I
wanted you to vote for me on this
Google link. And they give you a link,
the ones right above it. I want to
show you that they followed up with another
one saying with the same message twice and
then followed up the next day saying, please
support me. So clearly, there was an effort
to get certain people or rather just people,
but I think it was a tailored thing
to get people to click because if you
had clicked on it, you lost your account.
Now here's what the additional part of this,
and I'll go through more about more evidence
of this.
People like Zoe, who this is from, lost
their account. And now they're being told by
Twitter that they can't recognize who they are,
so they can't have access back. And they're
still locked out as of this moment. Unless,
like, less that changed in the last so
many hours. I haven't spoke to Zoe since
this morning.
So think about this because what's happening is
people are being tricked by their back, but
somebody who hasn't messaged them that doesn't have
to be Twitter right yet, by the way,
connected. I just think the timing's interesting, and
I'll get into some other points. But people
are being sent the link they're clicking on,
and next thing you know, they're out. And
people are posting, then that then they go
on to post those on everybody else's messages.
That's what happened. This Zoe was it was
being sent from Zoe's account saying, Ryan, vote
for me on this new podcast thing. And
she met she text messaged me saying, hey.
Don't click that. And but I had I
had already basically caught on because I'd seen
that in the background and seen weird people
do it and just ignored it. But at
that point, I was mad because I could've
warned her or could've warned anybody. Guys didn't
know what it was. Right? So here
is another example. Blakely was actually the first
person I saw. She's I she sent me
a message going, you know, hey. You know,
do you wanna click this? And I and
I I was gonna I like her work,
and I think she does calls out good
things, and I was just weirded about it.
I said, hey. Is that from you? Is
that and then she responded going, oh my
god. You're I'm glad you caught on to
that because she's now been locked out of
her account. Now I haven't checked if she's
back yet.
Last I checked, she was posting only on
her backup.
Let's see.
No. That looks like an hour ago. But
see, this is hard to tell because I
don't know.
I'll let you guys decide. I don't wanna
do the do try and prove it on
here. But because, you know, this she posted
this saying, please only follow her backup account
right now.
Yeah. She got she says I got hacked
while having two FA. You see my point,
guys? Telling you, this is not some ad.
There's something going on here.
Anyway, but, you you can decide if she's
back up or not, but she posted this
on a regular account saying, please follow me
on this because I'm dealing with this crap.
So, overall, before I get into this next
post, which is a different point, is that
I've seen this with a lot of people,
and you've probably seen this going around. Now,
on top of that, it doesn't seem to
be connected with the
podcast voting link. Whitney Webb just had her
account hacked.
And I thought she should've been right there,
actually. Here it is.
She reached out to let me know that
and but I asked her and she said,
no. I there wasn't any kind of
a link that I clicked or anything like
that, which is pretty weird. Right? So that
means that some some other random thing, somebody
was able to hack Whitney's account. And so
she's now locked out and the same thing
is happening. As Mark wrote, hey, support. You
blocked Whitney's ability to log in to Twitter
due to suspicious login detected asking for help
to bump this to the support. Now she's
reached out, and they're saying the same thing.
We can't verify you. So this is going
on. Right? This is not I honestly, genuinely
think this is not a bug. It's a
feature. K? But you can decide for yourself
what you think this is. I just saw
this weird kind of series of these things
happening, and it all seemed to time right
around when they changed and updated their background
message thing. So be aware of that.
On top of that, before we get into
some more things
I mean, really, the same point was just,
you know, what's going on? And I don't
wanna make it because that that point alone,
just to be clear, is just about the
hack and what might have happened. My thought
is that it connects to Twitter. I think
with Whitney's thing, it's more more relevant. Whether
or not that's the case, I wanna be
very clear that's my opinion, because I do
think that there's a lot of,
not weaponization, that too, but that they're, you
know, use profiteering from your information, your data,
your engagement, training their AI models with their
CAPTCHOs and whatever else we've always been doing.
So here
is another point that on Twitter,
we already and and this is Alan McLeod
from Menpress News, reporting that Twitter users were
finding their real names being Googled in Israel
after their verification software, Autentix, had verified them
for Twitter. Surprise, surprise. Right? What a coincidence.
It's literally Israeli intelligence connected. It's run by
Israeli intelligence elements.
I think the owner was a former 8,200.
The point is that I think that there's
something to this and where this all goes.
Now think about this and the weaponization of
it.
We I mean, I can't even count, so
many of us. Now not because we felt
we could verify this, maybe some of us,
but just the idea of what we saw
in Pokemon Go when that came out. Remember
what we all talked about? Well, that's pretty
weird. I mean, you're basically you know, you
you were using this this, what's it called?
I forget the the term
where it's not fake, but it's not real.
You're using a lens and you're looking through
your lens and it's like the world around
you through the lens, but it it puts
things on the screen. So Pokemon. So you're
looking at your living room when you see
Pokemon in the living room, for example. The
point was what a lot of us tried
to show you was both because of the
connections to the app itself and who built
it. We said, Look, guys. The US government
is basically using this to to get real
time three d mapping of everything around you.
Oh, and everyone thought we were so crazy.
You guys are so conspiracy there. Turns out
that was the case. And I don't even
think we that's not even that surprising with
everything we're dealing with with our, you know,
Tesla, basically. I mean, the the idea of
that car system and how many times we've
had wild accidents and crashes, and, you know,
it just still seems to be the the
thing that
it's part of the growth of the whole
system, guys. That's the point.
143,000,000
people thought they were catching Pokemon. They were
actually building one of the largest real world
visual datasets in AI history. And this is
a you could please look into this, guys.
The point is to understand that this has
been going on a long time.
Now Now this is just one point to
get into some tech points to start today.
But I really want us to think about
the bigger picture, whether it's warfare or not.
These things, in many cases, can be planned
out in it's not the one plan, but
multifaceted directions based on how we respond. And
today, even using AI algorithms and modeling to
get there. Twins, digital twins, the whole thing.
Just be aware of how this stuff is
applied. And then back to the point of
how this is being used on these platforms,
that you get the whole Twitter experience,
I feel is exactly that. My opinion, however
you think that relates, that we are being,
you know, harvested in a sense. And I
don't mean that in the weirdest way, but
just like what we're engaging with, just get
training these models and so on.
On top of that, Jordan points out, just
in case you didn't see where the world's
actually going where we're all being distracted, and
I don't mean that it's not real, but
just that this is an overfocus like anything
major going on can be. Data centers under
construction in The United States. The number of
data centers currently under construction by states state
shows how quickly AI infrastructure is expanding. For
the podcast,
I mean, I I I'm almost willing to
bet you there's more than this. Texas, a
135,
one of them being the Elon Musk discussion.
Virginia, a 134. Georgia, 51. Ohio, 45. Arizona,
35. These are billion dollar data centers that
are absorbing
unprecedented amounts of water and resources.
A 135
in Texas, 134
in Virginia. And it goes down the list.
21 Mississippi. Illinois, 19. Iowa, 16.
That's insane.
Why do we need all of this? Because
they're turning your life into what they need
for their preeminence.
If you think otherwise, I don't know what
world you're living in. These people think do
you think these people care about our lives?
Every day, every second, we get examples from
their own mouths that they don't care about
human life, let alone our interests.
I'll include the welcome to the Palantir World
Order point. You just include this to the
segue to the next point, but realize all
of this is interconnected.
DHS, foreign policy, it's all coming in the
same from the same place. Kim.com on the
fourteenth posted about, to the White House, don't
listen to Palantir, Al or Palantir, Kallis, Karp,
Peter Thiel, you are losing. This cannot be
turned around. Kim.com was trying to get their
attention from the whole and this includes everything.
I wanted to point this out again. At
some point, we were gonna do a, probably,
a deeper conversation about this. This is a
guy, his name is dirtyindy on Twitter, who's
claiming he's an ex Palantir executive. And it
is factually correct, he writes, that Palantir intended
to take over the US government while heavily
funding the effort. Many of his ex colleagues
are now installed inside the the United States
government apparatus. He says there's a reason that
the c suite of Palantir has him blocked.
Now consider it for yourself.
You know, the the the reality of the
point, the situation is accurate. But whether he
is
his claims are accurate.
Whether he is the maybe he's the crazy
one that feels spurned and wants to lie
about him. Who knows? But consider what he
is saying since he literally worked for them
and they're all blocked him now, and he
seems to align with an opinion that most
of us see coming.
On top of that, Giannis points out from
Gaza's killing fields to the NHS, now to
Britain's financial conduct authority.
Palantir's ghastly tentacles have penetrated every pore of
the British state. The UK's demos
is now well
and truly expelled from The UK's democracy in
name only. But don't don't worry. Alex Jones
told you it's a small little democrat thing
that we're overreacting about. So just shut up
about it. Right? Listen
knows he knows what he's talking about, apparently,
that it's totally not taking over everything around
us all over the world. Now, by the
way, on that note, and I don't wanna
say too much because it very well may
not end up happening, but I've got an
interesting interview planned. And I'm hoping we'll be
coming out in the next couple of weeks
with somebody who has some pretty, pretty alarming
and insightful things to say about Palantir and
how it connects to the global conversation.
Mister nobody points out, Citadel CEO Ken Griffiths
Ken Griffin says the world needs a savior,
and the hope is that AI will be
the savior. Now, he did go on to
say in production,
so
it's selectively edited. Even that, it does make
a big difference on what he said, doesn't
it? But, nonetheless,
that we need a savior and AI will
be that in production or anything else is
still alarming to me. This is the way
they're viewing the world sitting there with Larry
Fink at the World Economic Forum. You know,
Trump's right hand man when it comes to
the financial world. I mean, if you think
that's a joke, by the way, I'm still
blown away how so many people don't even
know what's going on in the administration of
the people that they support.
Blair BlackRock's Larry Fink abruptly becomes part of
Trump's inner circle.
And this is not just one article, guys.
You could care to look if you want
to. He was super a part of Trump's
first administration. But apparently, BlackRock is only bad
when it's next to Democrats' names.
Hashtag two party illusion. Even Orin Schroyer Oyen
Owen Schroyer
points to
the AI framework.
Hope you can read read that. It's really
everything we it's it's just an extension of
the same as Catherine said, it is the
framework for the control grid. It is what
they're building around you, and even,
Owen points out, they're building the AI surveillance
state government. Hey. Guess what, guys? Too late.
That's been built. So I disagree with this
framing. This is bigger than that. The AI
surveillance state government guys, we were there long
before Palantir.
Here is the Palantir is the and the
rest of it is the is the building
stage, but what we're talking about or what
he's pointing to, rather Trump and his AI
framework, is the global dynamic.
And it's not just about surveillance, if you
understand where this really goes. But at least
he's pointing to it with concern. You know,
it says straight out dystopia, and some of
you are celebrating it. We've lost our minds.
Well, only people in the partisanship have. See,
these I'm glad he stepped away from Infowars,
but what I had to notice is people,
whether honest or not, will step away from
that and then just pull go fall right
back into the partisan divide.
We need to start going back, you know,
not go, we've lost our minds, but partisans
have lost their mind. That's the right perspective.
Because as far as I can tell, anybody
I'm talking to that recognizes the two party
illusion also seems to see the bigger picture.
And we may disagree on what it ultimately
ends up being, but it seems that without
fail,
every one of you that goes, yeah, two
party illusion seems to recognize
everything else too. What a coincidence.
I'm dead serious, by the way. I don't
think I've even met somebody who agrees with
the idea that it's an illusion of the
political divide who doesn't seem to see almost
everything else.
Think about that for a second to recognize
why certain people tend to malinger
within the tar the partisan game. I'm not
even necessarily talking about Owen. I'm just saying
there's plenty out there that he he's kind
of freshly broken from Infowars, so I'm giving
him time to see where that goes.
Wall Street apes, in regard to the partisanship,
comes out yet again and wants to let
you know it's all coming down. Donald Trump
was right.
This is posted on the March 22. Gee,
what else was going on in the March
22? It's like, who knows? Nothing else, apparently,
because this is all that matters. Director of
the FBI, Cash Patel, confirmed with facts. By
the way, I'm pretty sure this video is
from, like, from, like, a year ago, but
whatever. And it says, Nancy and if it's
not, it's even better for the point. Nancy
Pelosi involved in setting up January 6. Correct.
She made sure there was no natural guard.
Correct. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy
filming. Correct. 250 agents were okay. Correct. Good.
Correct. Hooray. Guess what? Nothing's gonna happen.
Watch. Now watch as nothing happens. I mean,
look. I hope I'm wrong. I say it
every time. I mean, but I I don't
even I can't even make take this seriously
anymore. How many times can people like this
hype the same point and not even with
new information and to and nothing ever happening.
Not even the direction. Not even a subpoena.
Not even not there's I don't see a
single piece of legal,
momentum,
documentation.
Even, like, prepping for some kind of a
lawsuit. Nothing. Or,
indictment or anything.
I don't believe Pelosi or any of the
rest or Obama or any of them are
actually gonna be held accountable because they don't
want to, because the team is not just
one side,
if you really understand it. I genuinely hope
I'm wrong. But as I said with Comey,
as I said with James, both of which
you should be in prison, both of them
have been dismissed because they set it up
to fail, like I said in the beginning.
But, hey, Wall Street names, oh, it's all
coming down, and and everybody down there, yay,
except the ones like us who are going,
do something then. And a lot of them
are big Republicans who are starting to catch
on to the game.
Now in regard to the Sayback and other
partisan manipulation,
this is an interesting clip. You could take
it two ways. I'll play it first, and
I'll let you hear what he says. As
Ford News writes, it appears speaker Johnson was
caught on a hot mic discussing the Sayback.
Well, we thought it would be 12, but
it's the fact that it might be 18%.
That'd be a huge
turnout. You can see on the on and
it is correct for the for the, subtitles.
Turnout. So voter turnout. Because remember, one I
mean, I'm actually less concerned. I mean, I
shouldn't say
I I guess correct. Less concerned about the
voter turnout part of it because of the
reality of how I feel our votes are
not actually translated to the outcome because that's
been stolen from us a long time ago.
Not that it doesn't matter.
So I'm less concerned with that than I
am with the digital ID part of the
specific save act part that's been added to
the larger save America point.
But it's important, though, because there are very
valid points to show how this will diminish
the percentage of people who are able to
vote. I I'm of the mind that's just
a simple directional I mean, look at where
that leads to. It's gonna lead to the
point where people will get digital elements to
be able to get back inside the game.
That's exactly what they want. The point, though,
is that you could read this as either
cheering on
the reduction of the of the percentage, which
is what all the Democrats are saying. See,
we told you. They wanna phase out the
people who can't vote me, I guess. But,
again, just like the the right and immigrants,
why does that you like,
you
why would that only mean Democrats? Are we
of the mind that only Democrats are the
ones who aren't able to no. I would
argue many of them, if not more, are
Republicans in rural areas.
But even then, that's not the same as
it was before back in the day. It's
not only rural Republicans, guys. We are lied
to and missed like, about so many fundamental
things of how these all like, the point
about the immigrants is that you can look
at the stats. The game of where immigrants
only work for Democrats is just not true.
It's not. In fact, it's changed a lot.
Even Trump made that point during his last
administration.
So the real question
is if if this is
diminishing, is it in their interest anyway? But
the second point, or I guess more of
the real question is, is that is it
is it him praising the idea that they're
reducing that and then would that even help
them?
Or is that them pointing out that this
is an increase
in voting and that would be good for
them. And in that then point is in
that point, then is he only talking about
Republican percentages?
I think either way, it makes a very
important point. I'll play it one more time.
Well, we thought it would be 12, but
it'll affect maybe 18%.
That'd be a huge threat.
Right. Okay. So there's only a couple ways.
Right? So first, let's take it as what
the some of the Republicans are arguing they're
talking about. Well, he's just talking about the
fact that it will increase the percentage Republicans
that engage. Well, guess what? What does that
show you? It shows you that nobody in
this country,
at least let's just take Republicans, but combine
that and you have under 40%, which is
always what Steve and I are talking about.
Every election, you have basically 40% of barely
40% of people that even engage. And then
within that, the vast majority of them identify
as independent.
So we've we've been it's it's so clear
how we've been played for so long. We
just get the same old screaming people at
the top that keep you wrapped up just
like the same ones screaming on the war
like with the Iraq war. It's the same
grouping. I don't know why as average people,
we can't recognize that. Who knows? Maybe we
can, and we're just not allowed to be
in the conversation.
Part of me thinks that's where we are,
same as the majority of everything else. You
get the screaming idiots. You get framed like
they're well, everyone thinks that we're all going,
we don't think that. I don't know. But
my point is, if it's only 18% and
that's a positive number, then nobody believes in
these people. Then nobody votes for these people,
and they're hiding that. But if it is
because he's talking about the total turnout, well,
then it's the same point that anyway. Now
I wanna be clear that this will reduce
percentage in voting turnout. And I don't know
why that wouldn't matter for people if the
argument is to make sure every American votes.
Seems kinda counterintuitive.
But all that aside, I think what's most
important is that, one, they're lying about a
lot of this stuff. And really, again, this
is more than just about voter turnout, especially
when you realize what I think the reality
is about the voting.
But as he writes,
it's appear it appears Mike Johnson got caught
caught in Hot Mike. The Sabacc result in
12 to 18% voter turnout. You could take
it that way, saying that would be huge
for the Republican Party. Save act as voter
suppression bill. It's what he says.
Elon Musk, of course, says failing to save
the Pass the Save act is an act
of high treason against the American people. I'm
just so tired of the hyperbolic, nonsensical politics
for the these people are just try like,
I don't mean this in, like, a dismissive
way. They're they act like children. Look at
the way Trump is acting. Look at the
way Elon acts. They act like children with
billions of dollars is what they act like.
They're what what kind of statement is this?
It's legislation, which means it could fail or
pass. Like any other bill ever, no matter
how important you think it is, you could
be incorrect. Majority of the country could disagree
with you. Or it's all a big fraud
and everyone does and the government lied to
us anyway. It happens every day. I'm not
agreeing. My point is to say it's an
act of treason for the one thing you
want to happen not happening is just manipulation.
It's just and and, again, it's no more
important than any other thing we've dealt with
before. It's just another piece of legislation that
continues this the funding of all the things
that I personally want to go away on
top of the fact that it will enshrine
digital ID going forward. Why do you think
he wants it, ladies and gentlemen? You can
decide for yourself. As I said right here,
real ID compliant ID, which is what it
requires with this bill.
On top of the extra pieces that are
currently added, like we talked about, the
birth certificate, the passport.
Right? But as I told you and as
you can read right in the documentation of,
of course, when you add on to the
mobile driver's license part that's also continuing again,
eventually, all of those will be digitized. It's
very clear. So all it is is giving
you those options now until you can eventually
end up using old and digital versions of
them. This is where it's going. It's a
slow path to slowly break off different options
with the one thing being continued, the Real
ID comply, the Real ID act.
You don't need that. You don't need that
part of it to do what they claim
they want, which is to protect voting. Right?
So if it all it is to protect
voting and that's just just the original save
act part of it,
then you don't need the digital part. So
why are they doing that? Right? If if
that seems to be a hit a a
a point of contention, and it is for
a lot of people, then why wouldn't they
just move it out of the way if
what they really wanted was to protect voting?
You know the answer. And it says you're
using the the desire to enforce the law,
which is immigration in this case, to trick
Republicans into supporting backdoor digital ID. Remove the
real ID aspect, and you know what, guys?
You get the exact same outcome.
If you understand that and, you can prove
it because I'm giving you the materials to
do so, then call it out. But they
don't care about this. In fact, it seems
that
I mean, you and I got some support,
but
here is the article of the show we
did back on 2024,
July.
And I'll just include the act again. This
is the update one consistent with the requirements
of the Real ID Act of 2005,
which, I think I actually closed it on
there, but I included in the last show
we discussed, and it's in the original show.
And the point is you can just look
it up and read it for yourself. And
it's very clear. It's all about the digital
transition.
And same thing with the ID twenty twenty
element, which was they're one the same. They're
two parts of the same large agenda. It's
about digital transition.
Now, again, I wanna in case you didn't
hear me say it, there are a lot
more pieces to this, and this is where
we get into the TSA overlap.
Guess guess where this all comes back to?
And this is just honestly, this is such
an unimportant point. It's just really just about
dishonesty, which if you're out there believing these
people are not dishonest, then I don't know
what kind of cartoon you're watching because these
people, left and right, all across the board,
are some of the most dishonest people I've
ever had the dishonor of watching.
White House. The crazed Democrats are not allowing
TSA agents to get paid.
Well, gee, does that think you think that's
the truth? It wouldn't surprise me because both
sides are petty children that are willing to
hold up what Americans may want in order
to get what they want. But the point
here is that's not actually the reality, and
it's the same thing he did before. And
by the way, this does actually have a
piece of it's relevant to the larger Iran
conversation before we get into the lie about
what I think is the lie about the
potential talks because this guy, more than anyone
I've seen in this position, seems to be
willing to just
like whole cloth lie,
knowing that you can look up the opposite
like, look up other information. It's as if
he believes he's the only source of info
out there, or that he's so full of
hubris, he believes you won't listen to anybody
else. I don't know,
but let's go through this. The crazed Democrats
are not allowing TSA to get paid. Would
it shock you if I just told you
that every single Republican just voted down funding
the TSA?
Would that seem strange for what he just
said? It should because it doesn't make sense,
does it? And if you're an honest Republican
and you know that, wouldn't you go, is
he either being lied to or is he
lying to me?
And either one should be alarming to you
if you're an honest person.
This person back this is even back on
the sixteenth.
And then I was this is what I
was gonna show back when this was happening
on the sixteenth. I never got to it.
It only came it only came back around.
In twenty four hours, Senate Republicans blocked five
separate bills to fund TSA and so on.
Now, you you could pretend that's not true.
It is, but that's not the point for
today because it happened again. We'll get to
that right now. The point is, that did
happen. And they are claiming Democrats don't want
it. But the reality of the whole thing,
guys, is that Trump, on the eighth and
before that, said very clearly that he refuses.
And this is my point. He knows he
said this. He knows it's out there. He
knows we're aware that it was stated. Right?
Just like with the Iran conversation we'll get
to. Only cease obliteration. No ceasefires possible.
Donald Trump refuses to sign other bills
until Sayback is passed. Okay. So here's the
thing. You can argue that you agree with
them. You can say, you know what? Sayback
is so, so important that we won't allow
anything to happen until they give us that.
But what you can't do is pretend that
that's their fault.
Right? Because, I mean, it's both of their
fault as always, like the shutdown as always,
because both sides are failing to put, you
know, compromise.
In this case, though, this is Trump saying
we want this, and you won't get anything
until we get what we want.
Now I guarantee you they're playing their same
games, but you can't pretend like this is
anybody else's point other than him putting his
feet down for this. And maybe that's what
he thinks you want. That's what I'm saying.
You could even agree with that, but it's
his choice.
So vast majority responsibility goes to the person
who set the table with that divide.
Trump warns Republicans,
this was
yesterday, no compromise on DHS deal, which is
what the he wants ICE to be funded
until
country destroying Dems push through save America act.
And on top of that, actually, it was
Dems I mean, the government wants DHS, quite
obviously, because that's their left, right. They all
wanna control your lives.
So the point is that Trump is continuing
to this day, yesterday, saying you can't get
that unless
you push through this ABAC.
That's just childish politics, guys. That's not how
that's gonna work. I mean, it might work
at the end of the day, but it
won't it'll create the situation that he's creating
foreign policy, where it it's just nothing but
chaos and screaming and power struggles. That's all
he wants.
Here's what he said. This is today.
And this is at the in in Memphis,
by the way. Wish I could've had some
people to go check out that, you know,
film it and be there. You know, I
by the way, by the way, it's the
middle of the show. I just randomly jumped
them out. I forgot about this, but I'm
I'm looking to set something up locally here.
And, I mean, for the largely for people
who are in the field,
you know, but don't reach out if you're
interested. I'm not probably gonna get back to
everybody. But the point is I reached out
to Brad Miller,
seven seas. They're local. They're in Tennessee. I
haven't heard back from seven yet, but Brad
got back to me. And I'm basically just
saying, let's start, like, some kind of a
local media group
of our own, but also for community. So
it's not just work. It's also just being
local and having people we know here and
having that community of like minded people, but
also so we can, you know, reach out
and be like, hey. You know, what's going
on this that Memphis thing? Let's get somebody
down there to film it. We can work
with you. Like, I I think that's important.
So if you're out there and you live
in Tennessee, even whether I know you or
not, and you are in this field or
in somewhat adjacent, reach out,
you know, email, whatever else. I've seemed up
to get half of the things people send
to me. So
do your best. Or put it to somebody
in the chat. Let them reach out to
me. That's probably the best, to be honest.
Call the phone line in the office or
give it to somebody in the chat. Let
them relay it to me. That's where the
best relay.
But back to that, the point was this
is in Memphis where he gave the speech,
and here's what he said. There's a few
points we'll bring, grab from this. Just blaming
the Democrats.
After
the appalling lines and massive disruptions at major
airports nationwide last weekend,
I am again demanding that Democrats in Congress
immediately end their disgraceful
shutdown
of the Department of Homeland Security and to
restore the full funding for airport security and
the TSA.
They are holding it up
because they wanna take care
of illegal immigrants coming into our country.
Oh, is that why?
Or or and and maybe they do, though.
But you seem to be leaving out a
very important part of that story, don't you?
They wanna take care of criminals that
are in sanctuary cities.
They wanna take care of transgender
for everybody. Literally, the Okay. So do you
get what he's doing here?
Okay. These aren't necessarily incorrect points in the
broad sense, but what does that have to
do with this? What he's doing is simply
going all the things you hate about Democrats,
which we all know, which are involved in
many different overlapping bills. By the way, that
half the time Republicans are involved in, they
just don't talk about it, or the overseas
funding with NED or USAID that fund the
same things they all criticized right now.
We're just all we're just all a bunch
of dishonest partisans in this country, apparently. I
don't mean that, but that's the the framing
we're showing why nothing ever seems to change
because they're all lying to each other and
laughing about it, but we all call it
out. The point
is that this is quite obviously not the
reality.
Right? You're creating this false back and forth
to make it look like
they're the ones shutting you down when you
set the table to stop this from ever
happening. Now the bigger question is, is that
by design? Is there something else happening? Is
this just petty division politics, or is there
something intentionally happening here? Maybe just creating this
discussion to stop this from paying attention to
how
catastrophically
they're failing and everything else.
Mutilization
of our children.
Men in By the way, the mutilization,
in case you missed that.
Men in literally the beautilization
of our children,
men in women's sports,
but what they don't wanna do is give
us anything to do with,
citizenship for voting
or voter ID.
Yep. Digital ID, ladies and gentlemen, is what
he's really talking about whether he even knows
it or not.
You don't need that to make that work
because I just showed you. But isn't that
just dumb? Like,
if you're out there going that's their fault,
then you're a partisan
juvenile person. Like, you there's no this is
not about left or right. It's about observable
facts. And it should people he'll just say
the thing like that, and people just follow
along.
And it's the same on the left. Now
this, I find insane.
So take a look at this for yourself
and all the wrong have the wrong one.
It's either way, it's same point.
Take a look. Okay. This is the voting.
And point,
specifically
TSA funding.
Every Republican.
Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay. Nay.
Okay. So if you wanna make it about
the TSA and why the TSA won't be
shut, that's why we have to deploy ICE
to these hot airports. Yeah. That's totally not
by design, is it?
And that that means that they're playing their
role as the Democrats. Either way, if you
think that or not, the point is you
can't say the Democrats won't fund the TSA
when every single Republican voted no and Democrats
all voted yes. I mean, to a tee.
That's insane. This is inversion of reality.
Or or just that, you know, you're making
it out to be some kind of a
nuanced thing out to be definitive. It's not.
You can't claim it. It at the very
least, it's both responsible for making sure that
they don't get what either side wants.
Just sad. And here's an here's the I
was showing you. This is United States Senate
Committee on Appropriations.
Senator Murray responds as 49 senate Republicans vote
down bill to pay TSA.
That's two days ago. And you now he's
up there saying that they won't fund the
TSA? That's just stupid, guys. I don't know
why we don't call it what it is.
Now here's an even crazier point I saw
before I went live. This is from today.
Republican, Kenneth senator Kennedy
blames Trump for why it's still shut down.
So this is getting even more ridiculous. Now
who knows what's driving his decision here? I
tend to see him as a very team
player Republican, but who knows? Suddenly, he's coming
out and going, Trump's the reason. They gave
him a deal, and he said no. You
know why? Because he said no dealing with
Democrats.
And then has the gall to stand up
and say they're refusing a deal with us.
This is stumped, guys. And, again, I my
larger point, I feel like this country is
being broken down.
Senator Cruz and I came up with a
plan. We said, look. It's a two step
process.
The the the Democrats have offered to open
up everything but ice.
Ted and I said, okay. Let's accept their
offer.
And then,
at the same time, we would offer
a, a bill for reconciliation
where we don't need any
democratic votes to, do whatever we wanted to
do with ICE.
And that way, we're out of the shutdown,
and DHS is back open.
Make sure you heard that.
That the deal would have worked out to
where they ultimately would have had the votes
to do whatever they want to do with
ICE.
And and that was Trump that said no.
Well, he's gonna say that next. Not because
of the ICE part, but because I think
he just wants so desperately what he thinks.
I mean, I I'm not gonna speak to
his intentions. I the the save act part,
I think is digital ID, but who knows
if that's what's driving his decisions?
Either way, what he's saying is that if
they would have done the deal that Trump's
the one that said no to, they would
have ultimately given them the free pass. I
mean, who knows if that's the way it'll
work out? But what he's claiming is that
to do whatever they wanted with ICE, which
is exactly what he's claiming they all want
and what Republicans want. And that right now,
what they're doing is stopping somehow.
So in a sense, he turned down the
very thing he claims the Democrats are stopping.
We submitted that. Senator Klaffoon submitted that to
president Trump,
as is his right. He said no.
No deals with the Democrats.
It would've worked.
We could've had TSA
paid by the end of the week,
but, the president said no deal.
Seems pretty simple to me. But, yeah, those
Democrats just won't let TSA get paid. It's
it's like the common narrative right now. And
you know what? You can look at every
single one of the red light holy crap
guys. Whatever you wanna call them. Benny Johnson
or whatever you all or or
guess what? Every one of them have made
that point. The Democrats, the TSA, they won't
let me why? Because that yeah. They're I'm
not even sure if it's that they have
some kind of, like, a website they check
or somebody's texting them what to say or
they just look at each other and share
the same thing. I honestly don't know. It's
equally embarrassing however you wanna look at it.
To me, it's just about whether you're honest.
You can see this.
Now into the Iran point, and it's the
same thing. It's important to hear. We have
a few more of other, like, dishonest points
to get to, but from the Iran perspective.
But it's important to think about that. Like,
if they're willing to be so shockingly dishonest,
just knowing that you can look and see
that they're lying with something so small in
the context of what's going on in the
world,
this I mean, you need to consider what
they're willing to lie about in a context
of what we're dealing with in this conversation,
the Iran
regime change effort.
Now Max Blumenthal
call pointed this out.
New York Times essentially confirmed that Israel played
a role in stimulating the violent regime change
riots that left 3,000 dead in Iran. Now
it's reports that's what seems to be proven
or rather the evidence can back up, but
it's only limited evidence. It's not proof. Like,
Iran could be lying about this. But the
claims of what I mean, get depending on
who you listen to, thirty, forty, 80, a
100,000, millions, depending on what Trump said that
day,
that really needs to show you how, obviously,
they and every one of those claims come
directly from Israeli intelligence. That was clearly reported.
The numbers, I think, was three to 4,000
was what Iran admitted to, and it seems
to back up with what we were dealing
with. But question it. Question it. And remember,
those are people we're talking about that even
the unions called out as being masked, armed,
foreign elements, and then they admitted to arming
them. So So I don't know what we're
even debating. The point though is that the
New York Times has covered more information showing
that they actually
Israel, as with before,
is behind the
protest movements.
So he didn't include the link, so I
include the archive for you right there. Let's
get into it.
Israel thought it could spur rebellion
inside Iran. Now what you'll find, by the
way, and it says that hasn't happened. So
one of the most obvious points is that
that means, guys, even with them trying to
create it, that people of Iran don't want
what they're offering.
Every time we've seen this and every time
we come back to the same point because
Israel drives this government into place, and most
of the American people seem to not want
that and they do it anyway, over and
over and over. But now the difference is
it seems most Americans are becoming to see
are becoming aware of that.
But think about this in the sense of,
you know, so thought it could spur a
rebellion inside of Iran. Now the New York
Times has a total flavor to this, one
where Iran bad guy all the time. They're
killing everybody, and they're murdering, and they're raping.
It's just, like, the same kind of sentiment
you get from these platforms. Consider that. And
then look for evidence, and you'll see the
same path that we're on. The point, though,
is that despite the framing of Iran bad
guy from this article, it's still undeniably showing
that Israel
has been trying to create this. And remember,
look, you you take I know people tend
this country especially tend to frame this as
just Iran as a terrorist, Arab, or whatever.
You if you come from a lens where
you it's all one or the other, good
guy, bad guy, you're not, I mean, you're
not objective in the conversation. And, ultimately, you
will be misled, and it's rarely that one-sided
in any conversation.
So the point is they keep coming at
it from this perspective and thinking about what
Iran is dealing with.
Think of it if it was just a
think of it,
a random country. You know? Pick a it's
Greece. Okay? And, ultimately, you have a situation
like this where
Israel decides they don't like the Greek leadership
and just decides to go in there and
and spur
unrest
and and and arm and fund and and
put their own assets inside and and drive
these things and then literally start creating paid
revolution.
Now right there,
do you think that's legal?
Do you think that's justified?
Whether or not you like or dislike the
Greek government, whether or not you think Greeks
fund terrorism,
that's not legal.
Just in case that wasn't cleared everybody. Okay?
It doesn't just because we have these cloak
and dagger movies about what the CIA does,
they're most of those movies are showing
full flatly illegal things. But we're good guys,
so we do it. It's okay.
That's that's the that's the idea they want
you to think. It breaks international law. I
mean, most clandestine operations do if you really
break it down. It's weird that that works
that way. Right? But it's always framed as,
like, we're getting, you know, sabotage, cloak and
dagger, assassination. Well, these are all crimes.
Literally. There's no situation where you can just
unilaterally Osama bin Laden. That was a crime.
Literally. Because that he if we're supposed to
tell ourselves that we we present the evidence
and we charge them with crimes, but we
all just let it go because he's that
guy. You know? Any of them like that.
Now you may even argue that that should've
worked that way because he was just so
bad. And you may be right. Then ask
why the US government worked with him for
all those years and why the Washington, I
always do this. What's the examiner? Washington Post
called him a a warrior on the path
to peace. That's Osama bin Laden until suddenly
he was the bad guy because or Saddam
Hussein was their ally until suddenly he was
the bad guy. And that's not even to
say they're not bad guys. The point is
they work with those people is the point.
But realize that they doing what they're doing
inside this country is illegal.
Period. And so that should matter when you're
talking about doing things for democracy and changement,
even though they still scream that word, but
when's the last time they ever actually followed
through with that? Because they don't want that.
But so think about that as we go
through this, that from its core, its origin
point, what they're doing is wrong and illegal,
and they're destabilizing the very country and the
very people, the very communities that they claim
they're fighting for, in Syria, in every other
place they've ever done this in, in my
experience.
It really is that simple. President Trump's hopes
that an Israeli plan to ignite an internal
uprising against Iran's theocratic government could bring the
war to a swift end have so far
been dashed.
Now remember, when they're talking about a theocratic
government,
which simply means relating to or denoting a
system of government in which priests rule in
the name of God or a god,
you realize they also have a president. They
also have a the same so the same
situation exists in
Israel,
despite how you wanna think about it. In
fact, there's I think tomorrow oh, Dan was
gonna start with that, by the way. But
tomorrow, I'm gonna get to some stuff about
maybe, depending on what else happens, about the
the,
you know, the racial aspect of this that's
being manipulated by plenty of people. Like, I've
shown you the extreme Orthodox Jews in Israel
that wear full covering, blackface covers, the whole
like, Dallas Jones just shared some clip that
turns out it's from Afghanistan of a couple
of kids that almost look like it's a
joke, like a costume thing, but even a
stop. You got a couple of kids wearing
full, you know, black garb, cultural differences, agree
with it or not. The game of what
he's playing is called slave, Muslim, Islam, terrorism.
It's insane
what these people are trying to do. And
the point is, if you have if you're
concerned about that, then you should be concerned
no matter where it takes place, including in
Israel, which you'll never hear them called out,
including Tommy Robinson, tried to use the picture
of the one happening in Israel and says,
look how bad Islam is. He didn't even
realize it was actually in Israel. And I've
broken it down. I even showed you from
the forward.com,
a Jewish platform, saying, Yes, those are Orthodox
Jews.
So, why don't we care about that? Why
don't we care about the head coverings for
many Orthodox Jewish women are forced to care?
It's the same thing and it's always one-sided
because they're framed as the bad guy. Now,
I digress.
The point, though, is to realize that we're
deciding what's good and what's bad based on
what Israel seems to want.
Within days of the war beginning,
said David Barnia, the Mossad chief, his service
would likely be able to galvanize the Iranian
opposition,
meaning Mossad.
So just to be clear, right out of
the gate, Mossad has been doing this our
entire life,
Constantly, nonstop, nonstop trying to manipulate what's happening
in Iran. So if you ever stood back
and wondered why they might do things you
might, you know, sub selectively
stops you know, censor this, stop these platforms,
don't let their media come through.
Yeah. I I'm not I my point is
I don't think censorship should happen from a
government's perspective in general when it comes to
its people. The people should be able to
access what they what they want, access whatever
they want, whether it's foreign government nonsense or
not.
So that's just my always my stance. The
point is you can understand why the government
might go, well, they're
constantly, every day, trying to spin lies about
what we're doing to our own people, and
you're kinda trying to stop that.
Weird exactly like these governments do here. When
they stop press TV and whatever else, they're
bad guys.
The one-sided perspectives in this country seem to
blow my mind sometimes, but I don't think
it's the majority.
Not for a long time now.
But so they've been in there doing it
for a really long time, igniting riots
and other acts of rebellion that could even
lead to the collapse of the Iranian government.
Totally not legal, by the way, in case
you were curious. Doctor Barnia also presented the
proposal to senior Trump administration officials during a
visit to Washington in mid January.
Well, that's interesting.
So that means Assad went to Trump in
mid January
well before this while they were in peace
talks and said, we're gonna bomb the Iranian
government. We're gonna go after we're gonna create
a divide and conquer situation. We're gonna regime
change Iranian's government. That's our plan in January.
And And then he went on to pretend
to be having talks all the way through.
Even when they bombed him in the room,
they were supposed to be discussing their proposal.
Happens every time. This is genuinely what they
do. And I mean, like, design. They plan
this.
It's just the this it's the most
there's no honor. These people have no honor.
They have no respect for anything. And, of
course, some people now think that's okay because
bad guy. You've fallen for that trap. Bad
guy or not, it's about you. It's about
who you are. If you become the bad
thing because they're bad, then you are the
same thing, and some people just don't care
about that.
Doctor net doctor mister Netanyahu adopted the plan
despite doubts about its viability
among senior American officials, which we all told
you. They said it's not likely to do
anything. Some officials and other Israeli intelligence agencies,
both he and president Trump seem to embrace
an optimistic outlook. So in case you missed
that,
American intelligence and even Israeli intelligence says, it's
probably not gonna work. And they both said,
let's do it anyway.
Now do you think that's Trump just being
optimistic, or do you think he's being misled
by whoever's in his ear?
You can decide, but I think it's quite
obvious. Well, us, Jan Dan Bongino, you think
someone's walking his dog? He know he's the
only one walking his dog. Well, guess what?
There's plenty of other people in the room,
and people in there were going, that's not
true. That's not gonna happen. US intelligence,
Tulsi Gabbard.
And he listened to somebody.
So Dan Bongino's lying. Big surprise. Killing Iran's
leaders at the outset of the conflict followed
by a series of intelligence operations
intended to encourage regime change, they thought,
could lead to a mass uprising that might
bring about a swift end of the war.
Now, again,
nobody believed that was what was gonna happen.
Both intelligence, it seems, at least parts of
Israeli intelligence, but specifically American intelligence was telling
him, if you take out the leaders, remember
the quote, you're likely gonna put more of
a hard line person in there. Now whether
that's their perspective through their broken understanding of
what Iran's government is or that's the truth.
Either way, it was the opposite of what
Netanyahu was telling Trump.
I don't think it's hard to miss. You
listen to Netanyahu, guys. Against
American interests, against American intelligence, against what other
parts of his American government had to say,
even against what some of the Israeli government
had to say,
killing Iran's leaders at the outset of the
conflict. So, again, this was their plan.
So, understand that all the time leading up
from then in between, where they were pretending
to have negotiations,
they were already planning to assassinate these people.
They were already planning these in intelligence operations,
which are currently ongoing. So, ask whether the
lies about everything. I mean, really, the best
way to look at it everything could be
an operation, could be a deception. That's how
they see this today.
And they thought it would lead to a
mass uprising.
And again, it did not
according to them.
So you look. There's no room in which
you should be thinking that Iranian people wanted
what they were selling,
just like every other time before it. Three
weeks into the war, an Iranian uprising has
not yet materialized.
The belief that and, again, right now, you're
hearing the opposite.
Here's a good point, actually. Take a second
and step back, and now think of all
the people who, at the last three weeks,
have been telling you, everyone's falling, Iran's coming
down, everyone's now, Ian, it could actually be
the reality. I don't see any of that
evidence to back that up. But as an
objective person, clearly, it could be falling down
behind us and we don't see it. They're
lying about it. But the point is all
the people who were saying,
everyone in Iran is protesting and they all
agree. Well, that's not true. Even if they
ultimately lose,
that wasn't true. So all these major Iranian
activists who are literally lying to you with
fake pictures of massive they were either misrepresenting
what was happening or lying.
It happens every time. So just remember which
ones are doing it if you're somewhere in
the middle. And you look at these, you
know, Monjabis, or I forget whatever their name
was, or, you know, whatever it is, or
Pallavi himself. They just whole cloth lied to
you because that's what their job is.
Continuing, it says, the belief that Israel and
The United States could help instigate widespread
revolt
was a foundational
flaw in the preparations for the war that
spread across the Middle East.
Just casually speaking about a,
you know, multi nation war that spread across
all why? Because they unilaterally illegally attacked Iran
based on the
incorrect assumption that by doing so, that they
could cause a revolution.
So they caused all the death and suffering,
all the killing of the Americans and all
the killing of the Iranians and all the
killing of the Iranians and all the killing
of Israelis because they thought they could just
make this happen by
strength,
or I guess what they think is strength.
It says instead of imploding from within, Iran's
government has dug in and escalated the conflict.
By the way, it's a nice way it's
a harsh way of saying they legally responded,
and it's all they've done. Striking blows and
counterblows against military bases, cities, and ships around
the Persian Gulf and against vulnerable oil and
gas installations. Right. Only and, again, I don't
need I'm actually wondering whether any of them,
by the way, have been attacked by Iran
because I have not seen them claim many
of these ones they claim, they say, but
most of these have been Israel and even
United States.
That's not that's a fact.
Even US Trump Trump spoke up and said,
he's angry that Israel's bombing this delay and
then went on to bomb two tankers.
So So I should mean I don't think
I don't I wonder whether that's even Trump
making those decisions quite frankly because all of
this has hurt him in the sense of
the oil prices, and they're lying about it
right now to get the prices to go
back down.
So this
shows you
that they tried to create this at the
expense of literally everybody.
Since mister Trump's first speech, American officials have
largely abandoned speaking publicly about the prospects for
revolt inside Iran because it was never real,
and it's not happening. Some remain hopeful that
one could materialize.
Through his rhetoric has become more though his
rhetoric has become tempered.
Mister Netanyahu still says the American and Israeli
air campaign will be aided by forces on
the ground.
Well, watch as that ultimately happens, and guess
what, guys? It already has happened. As I've
said from the beginning, whether you wanna talk
about the curves that they've armed or their
operations, we already know are taking place. This
is and that doesn't mean official deployment of
the blank ranking file, but it is happening.
And Netanyahu is very clear about that. But
it's not because he said it. But realize,
if it continue I mean, if we get
to a point where we're just marching in,
then Netanyahu told you it would, and that's
likely why it happened.
Behind the scenes, however, it continues, mister Netanyahu
has expressed frustration
that Assad's promises to foment revolute revolt in
Iran have not materialized.
Now, I I mean, that very well could
be the case and that both Netanyahu and
Trump were sort of misled. I get the
sense that this was Iran or Israel, like
every time in the past, creating the construct
where Trump thought he would get his war
that would save the world and he'd be
remembered forever for the hero. That's what he
always wants. That's all he seems to want,
his legacy.
So just like every the time before, Netanyahu
fed him exactly what he needed to hear
to think that would be the case, probably
knowing it wasn't.
Just getting one more they're just another battering
ram, another US presidency to throw it around
and get what they just at least they're
weaker now. We'll get we'll wait till the
next president do it again.
You have to understand that this is how
Israel's operated, and this is the reality when
you understand the wars The US has gotten
into at the behest of Israel my entire
life. It's not even a secret anymore. It's
publicly discussed. He's written books about it. We
this is where we are. Iran was the
endpoint.
And now Lebanon's spinning off around the side
of it because he sees, I think, his
last opportunity. But realize that's not the same
I mean, right now, they need to frame
that as all Iran, right, because that's how
they justify it. But watch as we get
into the continuation of Lebanon still being bombed
right now, even with the guys of pausing
the war. Weird how that works out. So
we're being told that shows us then, I
guess, that Lebanon is another
war of aggression for no justification? Yes. Yes.
Welcome to the conversation.
It says in one security meeting, days after
the war began, the prime minister vented that
mister Trump
might decide
to end the war
any day, and that Massad's operations had yet
to bear fruit. Okay. You can't miss this.
Okay. What this just said is that Trump
is being played by Netanyahu. And that what
he said is, look, if we don't get
this done now, Trump could end this any
day. So think about that with where we
are. We're right now, Netanyahu is gonna do
everything he can to manipulate the situation and
to continuing to be what he wants and
at the expense, clearly, of more US soldiers.
And it's right there in front of you
that he quick. We gotta do this or
Trump's gonna stop. How do we not see
where we're at?
In the run up to the war, current
and former American and Israeli officials said, mister
Netanyahu invoked Mossad's optimism
about a possibility
of an Iranian uprising to help convince
mister Trump
that bringing about the collapse of the Iranian
government was a realistic goal. Again, despite his
own intelligence and despite everyone around him other
than the Israel,
you know, influent, like the Stephen Miller types,
telling him that this was unlikely to be
the reality.
But Netanyahu
convinced him otherwise
and that it was possible.
So we're gonna engage with one of the
most unpopular wars in US history,
knowing it was gonna be a catastrophe because
of of everything we've always been taught. I
mean, everyone's been theorizing and gaming this out
forever because it's always been Israel's plan. It's
not even secret.
And a possibility of this outcome is enough
to make this happen.
That has to be alarming.
Many senior American officials, as well as intelligence
analysts at the IDF
and and their military intelligence agency, EMAN, viewed
the Israeli plan for a mass uprising during
the conflict with skepticism.
Think about that. Even their own team can
agree with that was possible. US military leaders
told mister Trump that Iranians would not come
out to protest while The United States and
Israel were dropping bombs. Gee, who could have
pieced that together? Maybe because you were bombing.
And it says because, again, guys, the point
was ultimately that this was all fed to
Trump, and he doesn't even realize how
you know, one side of it is he
wouldn't realize that it was clearly not gonna
come to pass. And you should ask why
that speaks to a lack of intelligence,
or I think he's completely involved in line
with the re agenda.
The the actual outcome, what Netanyahu wants is
exactly what Trump wants. I don't know how
to see it any other way. I don't
I'm not trained in any way to give
trouble paths, but that's how it seems to
make the most sense right now that he
is being completely manipulated. And like I said
in the beginning, that does not mean he's
the good guy.
His own actions have bull hide that. But
but e or he is a die hard
Zionist, a part of the plan. I don't
know. I just I just what seems to
make the most sense with where we're at
right now?
US military leaders told Trump that they would
not come out. Intelligence officials had assessed that
the possibility of a mass uprising
threatening the theocratic government was low.
Please let this sink in, especially for those
who support what he's doing. They knew that
this was the likely outcome, a not an
an an ending an a never ending reality
of war that was going to spiral into
another forever war.
And they doubted that The US Israeli attack
would ignite any kind of civil war, and
they did it anyway.
So either he decided to gamble on your
lives or he was lied to.
Now it's on on
regarding the Kurds, it says while many of
the, the specifics
of Mossad's plans remain secret,
one element included supporting an invasion by Iranian
Kurd militia groups based in Northern Iraq, which
by the way is already happening. Now whether
or not they've been
directed and, you know, they're there, and they
have been armed and they have been funded
as Israel told you months before we got
here.
Just because Trump says we don't want that
now after they've already initiated it, that could
be that he genuinely didn't want it to
happen because he realized something
realized he was being played, or he just
did it to make it seem like he
wasn't involved with that. I don't know.
But it's yet another example of an illegal
insurgency. They're funding and arming a proxy group,
a literal proxy group. They used them in
Syria. They've used them a lot of places.
And literally, of them were used, they dropped
them the moment they don't need them, and
they never give them what they're promised.
Yet, here they are again.
Says both the CIA and Assad have given
arms and support to the Kurdish forces. That
goes back in multiple places around the years,
the CIA had existing authorities to support Iranian
Kurdish fighters
and had provided arms in advance advice well
before the current war.
You have to understand that means with the
intentions of doing this in Iran.
Now the uprising has yet to come, it
says. American officials briefed on intelligence assessments before
the war
said the CIA evaluated a variety of possible
developments
inside Iran once the conflict began.
Intelligence agencies considered a full collapse of the
Iranian government to be a relatively unlikely outcome.
But yet that's what we were all told.
Oh, it's so weak. It's gonna go down.
We get ready to come immediately. It's all
gonna come down because they just tell you
whatever they need to say in the moment
to make you think like it's all going
to plan.
It's amazing we don't know this yet or,
again, that we'd all do, and yet we
all seem to still know and yet look
to a bunch of liars on TV.
The most likely outcome, however, was that hard
line elements of the existing government would maintain
control over the levers of power, the report
said. Yep. And even when Trump was point
blank asked about that, he lied.
So here we are,
where he was either played or absolutely knew
this wouldn't work and was decided to risk
your lives and your families anyway.
Mister Barnia's predecessor at Mossad, he's the current
head of Mossad, this
the predecessor was Yossi Cohen, the one that
was funding Hamas through Qatar,
decided that tie trying to foment rebellion inside
of Iran was a waste of time.
This is before we got here, and he
said, and ordered that the resources devoted to
that matter be reduced to a minimum.
During mister Cohen's tenure, which ended in 2021,
Mossad calculated how many of the country's citizens
would need to participate
in protest for them to truly threaten the
Iranian government.
Comparing the estimates to the size of actual
protests in '79. Okay. One more point here
on the same thing.
So what have we been told about Iran
in our entire lives? Everybody hates them, and
it's a it's a dangerous
terrorist government that's only hold it's basically holding
them by gunpoint, and nobody wants to be
there. Everyone hates the government.
And yet all this time, they've been trying
and trying
and try I mean, like, it look. This
goes back to well, before. This is this
is just referencing 2021, but it goes so
all this time, they've been in there trying
to incite rebellion, and yet still they have
failed.
And now we're come to a point to
where they truly just give it its final
shove, and Trump and Netanyahu go full blow,
and they fail yet again,
at least so far.
How can anybody honest look at that and
go, clearly, the Iranian people want to revolt?
No. It's I think it's possible. One of
the arguments the article tries to make is,
well, they all they would they would if
they if they, you know, wouldn't. Basically, if
they go out, they're all gonna get shot
by Iran. Well, certainly possible.
Wouldn't that have been factored in if that
was the case before you got here? That
wouldn't be some accidental awareness once you're doing
it clearly.
It's also just not the truth, guys. I'm
not saying Iran's government's not capable of all
the things we've seen, but it's just not
the reality. You can prove it a 100
different ways over, including people we often talk
to, people that have been in the country,
people who are currently in the country.
But who cares? Right? Because Trump said.
But the reality, though, is how long they've
been trying. It just shows you that they're
not really
that country, the people are just not what
they're saying.
It says, quote, we wondered if we could
bridge the gap, mister Cohen said in 2018,
and we came to the conclusion that we
could not.
It's very simple,
that we were trying to create
unrest and revolution.
We were trying to create that, and we
just couldn't make it happen.
That is as clear as it gets. The
people were not on board.
Instead, Mas'ad's strategy during that period was to
try to weaken the government until it essentially
surrendered to Israel and American demands. Oh, okay.
So who cares about the people? Who cares
about saving them? We're gonna what we always
wanted was just to control. So we the
the the effort to make them revolt against
their own government, a higher action is not
gonna work, so let's just go right at
them.
Yep. That's it. And it's not about freedom.
It's not about new government. It's about control
as always
to weaken the government until it essentially surrendered.
And guess what happens in that long term
sanctions or people starved to death? Families die.
Babies die. That yep. That's the reality, but
they it's worth it to them. Just ask
Madeline McCain. It's worth
it. Using a combination of crippling economic sanctions
and operations to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists, by
the way, which is a shockingly obvious war
crime, and military leaders and sabotage nuclear facilities,
which could end up being huge explosions. But,
you know, who cares? Israel good guy, apparently.
Doesn't matter. They could do all the terrible
things, white phosphorus, cluster munitions, gas attacks, but
it's okay when they do it because they're
fighting evil, guys. Just Don't forget that. Over
the past year, as the prospect of Israeli
military action against Iran became more likely,
Israel,
just like Rubio told us, they were gonna
attack one way or another, so we felt
that was probably the last way they pushed
Trump into it.
And that's not to say he was not
willing because he said it beforehand that he
was. But it says,
over the past year,
as the prospect of Israel's attack unilaterally and
illegal became more likely, mister Barnia reversed Assad's
approach,
devoting the agency's resources to plans that could
lead to toppling the government to Tehran. So,
all he all he said was that over
the last year, when it seemed clear that
Trump was gonna be
a malleable partner to shove into this war,
well, they started funding regime change again. And
I think they always had. It's about where
they focused on the effort. In recent months,
according to officials, the Mossad element came to
believe that Mossad could potentially begin igniting riots
around Iran.
Right. The protests. They want the riot the
the people with the mask
burning things down, beating up cops.
Those are the riots. Exactly.
After several days of intense Israeli American air
strikes and assassination of the leaders. And that's
that's the the recipe to save Iranians. Right?
To bomb their leaders without any concern of
what happens next, to just create riots and
burn things down, and release a bunch of
extremist crazy people who are ethnically cleansing and
raping. And, like, every other place they put
them in, Syria, Iraq, same thing.
Right? Hashtag winning.
After the strikes and assassinations of the war's
earliest days, the uprising did not come.
But Israeli officials say they have yet to
give up hope.
What a lovely ending.
We're not done with all of our terrorism.
We've yet to give up hope. We still
believe we can torture these people right into
submission. We're winning. Quote, I think that we
need boots on the ground, it ends with,
but they've got to be Iranian boots.
Or American, where is is the real point.
Watch.
That's what they're talking about. I mean, there's
even conversations of Israelis and Israeli media who
are saying we need to make sure that
US boots are the ones on the ground.
Watch. Take time to look at the Israeli
media. It'll make you sick.
It's everything they don't want you to hear,
proudly discussed.
Now,
interestingly,
Trump has in the midst of this, this
is today. This is on twenty third. Trump,
is in Memphis, remember?
Blames Pete Hegseth for the failed Iran war,
and a few other things that I think
are relevant. This just speaks to weakness as
far as I'm concerned. It shows you that
it's the same thing he did with Rubio
in the beginning, and, oh, that Rubio is
the one that did that, and then Rubio
came out and said, no, Trump started it.
They're just all trying to shove back and
forth. They ultimately hate each other as you've
seen in the past. It's just about trying
to work alongside for power, but they're trying
to shove responsibility back and forth. That's, you
know, that's not what leaders do.
And, unfortunately,
I came. I called Pete. I called general
Cain. I called a lot of our great
people. We have great people. And I said,
let's talk. We got a problem in The
Middle East. We have a country
known as
Iran that for '47
Oh, is that what happened? Funny how we
just learned the opposite.
Funny how we just got told that Israel
basically pandered Trump into getting into this, but
he wants to wax with hail about how
I just woke up one day and I
said, you know, Iran's bad guy. So you
know what? I'm gonna call. What do you
think, guys? Should we just go and illegally
destroy Iran for freedom?
I mean, this guy is an infant. I
mean, I don't know why we can't be
honest about that. He's got his savvy parts
in some discussion, but the way maybe it's
just that he's getting old. I don't know.
The eye the way that he does this
is so infantile. And it's so it's just
embarrassing.
Again, because you can literally look at what
he did before this, and it wasn't what
he's saying. He just tried to recorrect the
narrative because he knows that the blind followers
will repeat and it becomes I mean, you
might even it's worth thinking about.
Let's just say 90% of Americans are aware
that's not true, but he says it. So,
you get the million follower, 10,000,000 follower, Elon
Musk types on Twitter who yell the thing.
That gets more influence because they have more
influence on the platform than their AI's grade
that as somehow being more realistic. And, I
mean, you go forward ten years, look back,
and I bet you it tells you that
he was right. Think about that for a
second, how they can manipulate that kind of
idea. Right? Maybe it's not even by design.
But the reality is how far we go
until one day, it's just the history is
written by the winning hand, guys.
And here just embarrassingly
dishonest.
Fortunately, I came I called Pete. I called
general Cain. I called a lot of our
great people. We have great people, and I
said, let's talk. We got a problem in
The Middle East. We have a country
known as
Iran that for forty seven years has been
a just a purveyor of terror. Incorrect.
In, like, literally every possible way. I mean,
it's just it's we've gone over it a
thousand times. And I'll show you my interview
with Robert we just did, which goes through,
you know, pretty much everything they've claimed about
Iraq, about Houthis, about Hezbollah, about Hamas, and
just how embarrassingly dishonest it all is, and
how quite literally with ideologically you could prove
that they're lying. It doesn't even matter. On
top of the fact that they provably fund
I mean, I can't it's amazing to me.
Like, I say this every time. You take
what they claim about Iran, even though most
of it's false, and just pretend it's all
real and compare even those false claims to
everything we can prove, not even the full
picture, but just so we can prove The
US is capable of or have done or
Israel or combined. It is in it doesn't
even come close,
unparalleled. Like, it's incredible how much they've provably
done in the world. They just call freedom,
and they can just lie and lie and
lie about what and
we still can't see through that.
And they're very close to having a nuclear
weapon. Also incorrect, but do we didn't be
do we really need to do this again?
Like, this is my point. Every day, people
I mean, there are so many elements out
there from the IEA to Gabbard, to their
own administration, the previous administration, to other experts,
to scientists, other governments, everybody. But he can
just keep saying it, and people keep repeating
as Rubio said and dissent said.
It's not true, guys. The evidence doesn't back
it up is actually the more accurate way
to say that. There's no evidence whatsoever that
shows that's the case. It could be somewhere
we don't see. The facts do not show
that, and they just lie to you. We
can keep going and get that 50,000
up to 55 and 60. There's no end.
Oh, yeah. You know, the Dow, I guess,
because nobody cares about that. Or we can
take a stop and make a little journey
into the Middle East. Alright. Just a casual
little deja vu. We're just gonna swing in
there and destroy everything. You know? What he's
trying to say is don't worry, though. The
prices are gonna go up even though I
promised you they wouldn't, but take it on
the chin for Ukraine. Oh, I mean, excuse
me for for Israel. Oh, I mean, excuse
me for Iran. So gain the the
And eliminate a big problem.
And,
Pete, I think you were the first one
to speak up. Oh, yeah. I'll leave you,
Pete. You did it? Because you can't let
them have a nuclear weapon. Yeah. Well, they
don't have we all know we don't have.
You have in the show they don't have.
But, yeah, you We are now really good
discussions. They started,
last
night Oh. A little bit. We thought about
that for a second. Wait a minute. Can
I lie further? Can I stretch it further?
Well, it's not. I'm already lying. The night
before that. Oh, oops. Yeah. See? Now, you're
a little you got you can't you just
can't resist, you know? So he just argued
that 48 hours ago, they were negotiating with
Iran. Let's get into that. That's fun. Let's
see what he's talking about.
Okay. So let's get into the the main
point here. Oh, actually, really quickly before we're
gonna this is we're gonna get into the
argument of
oh, you know what? I did include a
few other things. This all this all part
of the same conversation, but you'll see why
it all relates. We're gonna get into the
main point of his allegations.
Here's what his article. Trump says Iran wants
to make a deal, but Iran claims that
never happened.
So first, this is just in the lies.
I mean, Trump just blatantly lied about what
happened like they do every single day.
For just a carryover point, understand how
willing they are to just blatantly lie to
you, Trump and Biden will still by Trump
literally just referenced beheaded babies,
like, a week ago.
In regard to October 7, it is one
of the most easily proof easily
demonstrated
I hate the word debunked this way to
use today. It is dishonest. It's wrong. It's
false. It's easily proven. Israeli media has proven
that. The people involved with the claim have
walked it back, and yet here they are
still making these allegations. My point
is, this is from Simon Majin saying the
defense editor
at The Economist,
which was one of the ones pushing that
at the time, like a lot of them
were, has now admitted that Beheaded Baby story
that he promoted and which was widely used
to justify Israel Israel's atrocities against Palestine was
fraudulent.
And you guys, it's it's we don't need
him to say that. We knew long before
he figured this out yesterday. I mean, this
is my point is, do you really think
that he just had found stumbled into this
yesterday? That's when he posted it. Suddenly, I
just realized that was wrong. No. There's something
shifting here. These people are either trying to
gain more clout by admitting they were wrong.
I don't know. But I guess it's possible
he just stumbled into it, but it's not
like there was a new story. The evidence
has been out there for,
what?
I don't know. Almost almost two years.
But just the point to take is that
even he is now going, yeah. Yeah. That
was false. Even though Trump just said it,
and as this guy rightly points out, it's
called atrocity propaganda. It's used by colonizers in
every conflict they provoke to portray themselves as
victims and justify their subsequent aggression. It's true.
I mean, this this is dehumanization one zero
one. It's what they do.
But realize,
they lie to you as a matter of
policy. So here's Joe Kent.
And and this is, I believe, on the
Megyn Kelly show of all places, but he's
simply saying, option Razzani is the one sharing
it, and I'll play this clip as well.
As we know, as we just heard from
the New York Times in in a in
a way, but we already know all of
this.
All 18, the intelligence community was clear that
there was
no imminent threat, and Trump
listened to Netanyahu.
How is that America first?
Intelligence agencies to agree on anything, it's very
challenging. It it is a a very,
laborious and and it's sometimes a very intense
process of coordination
and having people argue their cases. When you
have the 18 intelligence agencies saying without a
doubt that Iran is not working towards a
nuclear
weapon and the defense intelligence agency doing battle
damage assessment, which is what the DIA really
specializes in is having these military based assessments.
That's what I'm gonna go with. Being influenced
by the IAEA
or by another government, Israel in this case,
saying like, oh, no. Even though you conducted
Midnight Hammer and your 18 intelligence agencies say
that their their nuclear capability
is gone,
they're still somehow digging digging out from the
rubble, and they're gonna be able to assemble
10 bombs in two weeks. Again, sorry. I'm
going with the the with with what the
director of national intelligence said, and she's saying
that based on the research and the analysis
and the and the rigorous debate of 18
intelligence agencies.
But we don't even need that.
Because as we know, as we watch the
show or care to look at the evidence
that we're all referencing,
they destroyed their enrichment facility. They did not
obliterate their nuclear capabilities.
The if you wanna use that point to
argue, they might have it recognized their enrichment.
The the facility
was demolished.
That's that's publicly acknowledged. The point is that
means even if they had them, they wouldn't
be able to enrich it. That's on top
of the fact that they aren't even going
in that direction as Witkoff lied about and
the International Atomic Energy Agency's director general said
at the end of last year that 60
of 265
465
kilograms was within their safeguard.
And that's what he lied about. He says
they're bragging about 60% to put they can
make 10 bombs. That's where that all comes
from. Witkoff's
brazen lie based on nothing
but whole cloth lies. What what do you
think is driving that? You think Witkoff just
unilaterally decides to make this happen for his
own devious?
No, guys. That's Israel. That's what that's what
drove it from the beginning. Trump was influenced
by it. Clearly, Jared Whitkoff and Jared Kushner
and Whitkoff, who were both called Israeli assets
by other diplomats involved,
And even, the
the foreign minister of Oman came out the
day before they started and said they were
willing to give up their entire enrichment, everything
they had, all the enrichment they had. That
that 465, they were gonna give it up.
And Israel bombed that night.
You just can't miss this. It's so obvious.
Now he also shows this link in or
this, in here, showing you that it their
strategy,
of Iran. Iranians have only, been very methodical
and actually judicious in their escalation. They have
actually
only escalated, like, basically, they've been responding to
their attacks. And you can look for yourself.
It's not hard to see. I think they're
doing this the right way. They're showing the
world they're not what they've always claimed they
were. I think that's always been obvious if
you care to look.
You have said and you
warned us all,
since the twelve day war, actually, that, this
war was coming.
Just,
how would you characterize
Iran's escalation
right now, the escalation strategy,
because I suppose that's what everyone's thinking about
right now. Yeah.
Well, I would actually and and, again, as
no supporter of the regime in Iran, I
would tell you that the Iranians have been
very methodical and actually judicious,
in the the escalation. They have not actually
escalated on their own. They have always counterpunched.
So the Americans and Israelis, as you noted,
we initiated this fight on February 28 against
the best judgment of the They did.
We don't speak like we're the government because
we're not.
Now we always do I I do it
in passing sometimes by accident, but important to
think about. We are not that they did
that. They do not and in fact, let's
be real. They don't represent us. They're supposed
to. They do not.
US military joint chiefs of staff.
The president wanted to do this because he
was convinced this would be seventy two hours
to ninety six hours, one and done. Yeah.
And where do you think that came from?
His own intelligence told him the opposite. It's
not hard to see. Like, I really want
this to be clear to people, guys. There's
not even debate here. His intelligence community said
there one, there's no nuclear bomb. Two, there's
no imminent threat. Three, that if you do
this, you'll it it will not topple the
regime.
Some but clearly, something other than US interest
and US intelligence told him that. I'm sure
you could piece that together.
And then the people of Iran would overthrow,
the the benighted regime. That did not happen,
and now here we are three weeks in
with no end in sight. The Iranians have
escalated
only after we or the Israelis have. You
notice they didn't start attacking things like the
oil refineries
until after they really started getting hit when
in those, target areas in Iran. And so
what you're seeing is a very,
graduated
escalation program by the Iranian military.
Clearly, they have gamed this out for a
long time. This has clearly been the game
plan from the very beginning because the Iranian
studied the American and Israeli ways of war,
and they knew decapitation strikes would be coming
in. So they decentralized
their regime. Right. They decentralized command and control
capabilities.
They went underground like Mao did during the
Chinese civil war or the North Vietnamese did
during the Vietnam war. Okay. And then they
course it around and say, terror tunnels and
whatever else. Right? Even as they've driven them
into these responses, and it's objectively not what
we're actually talking about as Hegseth just tried
to argue that they're dumping all the money
into their terror tunnels and their weapons, and
it's just not even close to reality, especially
since the very oil money references to do
that, is the same oil they've been sanctioning
aggressively.
It's just so
honestly, I don't even think Hankside even knows
what he's talking about in that regard, but
either way.
They very
adeptly
created an insurgency, a high end insurgency profile
for fighting the Americans and the Israelis, and
now they're tethering it to economic,
attacks, which is brilliant because they know that
the Americans and Israelis are far more and
the Arab states are far more, exposed to
economic disruptions in the aggregate than are the
Iranians who have been sanctioned and, you know,
contained
for so long. It doesn't affect them the
same way. Exactly. This is really interesting. Right?
Because, essentially,
you you could argue it's planned,
that they plan this. But, essentially, the situation
that the US government Israel put them in
is now why they're essentially insulated from the
issue that that's being created by The US
and Israel. It's interesting. And, again, doesn't that
just show a staggering lack of planning
of The US and Israel interest? Or, as
I think is more likely, that Israel didn't
even care that they're using they're throwing the
US government in Iran and just they're gonna
get whatever they can from it. That that's
how I'm starting to feel this is going.
But on the lies, before we keep going
forward, just to see some of this stuff,
Pete Egg says bombastic claims of record breaking
strikes in Iran exposed as bogus by military
data. But it's a small point, though. But
we all know they do it. But just
think about this, that you have to stand
up and be like, this is the like,
this is very Trump style.
You bomb, then it's the most aggressive, most
you know, we did more bombing than any
bombing thing that's ever bombed in a history
of bombs. It's always how we argue talks.
It's always how we frame things. I don't
know why it shows weakness to me. You
you don't need to pound your especially when
you're clearly more military militarily
powerful than most, but they're just making things
up right now. On top of that, this
one just makes me sick. Think about doing
this knowing that that family is going to
see this. Remember in the beginning where they
pointed to the people that were killed, I
guess, the few they admitted to, as they
hide the fact that Americans have died? Father
of service member who was killed in Iran,
war, excuse me, and killed in Iran war,
said he never told Pete Hegseth
to finish the job.
I mean, think about what a sick person
that is. Now, again, you could argue that
he was lied to. Maybe his own staff
gave him that from somebody else and was
convinced that was real. I don't know. I
can see that happening because these people are
just being played everywhere.
But either way, guys, I mean, or or,
yes, more specifically, if he just lied about
that to make it look like the people
supported him, they came out and said, no.
We did not.
And they used them. That means they used
the soldier. They're using the family.
This makes me sick.
Oh, and then just speaking on, you know,
I guess, you know, looks to me like
one of the more Israeli assets in the
US government is a little bit frustrated it's
not going the way he wanted it to.
Here's Stephen Miller at the recent discussion with
Trump.
Its missile capabilities
were also growing so fast that it would
soon have become
He is not happy with Trump. I mean,
of course, it could be something else. But
look at that face, guys. I'm telling you.
This guy right here,
this guy gives me more villain vibes, and
it's just a personal feeling. Right? That's when
maybe he's the best guy in the world
for all I know. I doubt it. But
he gives me more of a villain vibe
than even somebody like Klaus Schwab.
There's just something off about this person. Completely
my opinion. And I just I I have
I feel like I have a good sense
of these things in my life. But that's
for nobody other than me. You should never
just take my personal feeling about anybody, but
it's interesting, though. But here he is listening
to Trump talk about the Iran war. Transmissile
I I see. I don't know how else
you can see that as literally no one's
talking to him. He's sitting around. He's listening
to Trump talk, and that's what he does.
Trans missile capabilities
were also
And, of course, as they frame it, which
is kinda funny to me.
And this is the Tennessee holler, says, Memphis
ABC catches deep sigh from Stephen Miller as
Trump pedals his ever changing justification about Iran.
Now I doubt I doubt that's what he
you know, who knows? But I do think
it's important to recognize that this person has
been viciously trying to drive some of the
worst agendas this country's ever seen. And I
don't even mean what you may think he's
doing. I mean, what he's actually doing around
what you may actually want. And this man
is just not on your side, guys. I
don't know why people can't see that.
Now, getting into the larger point, the pretty
much the rest of the show is the
main point here.
This is just oh, and this what I
want to include right here was just understand
what this what Israel is still doing and
what they're capable of. And that right now,
the US government is being
shoved into this or tricked into it by
something
that is doing this.
As Glenn points out now we're gonna I'm
not gonna get into it explicitly,
in-depth today, but Lebanon is exploding.
Like, it's always been going on. It's been
going on well before the Iran party started,
but they're just bombing just bombing homes and
literally telling you they're gonna be bombing homes.
And it doesn't even blip on the western
media.
Here's Glenn Greenwald citing Sarah Wilkinson saying CNN
says the Israelis are dropping huge bombs on
residential areas in East Iran, leaving entire private
blocks
blown up.
No. I don't take CNN's word at face
value. That's not what we're referencing, in fact.
I'm gonna show you the articles written by
Israeli media that are telling you they're gonna
do that directly from the mouth of the
US government, the Israeli government. So for those
that were already dismissing this because CNN, well,
you're the problem in the room. The point,
though, is that this is what they've done
every single war I've ever seen them involved
in. And if you don't know that, then
you weren't paying attention. Look at what they've
been doing publicly, whatever you think the narrative
is. Hundreds thousands of hospitals and schools and
human shields. Everything they claimed the other side
would do that they
did not.
As Glenn writes, oh, wow. I can't believe
this. Targeting civilians with bombs and death is
so out of character for the Israelis.
He's being facetious, in case you didn't catch
that. Sean King cites Reuters.
Exclusive. Patriot missile involved in Iran blast.
You know, one of the comp many of
the conversations being just bull like, just assume
that it's Iran bombing all of the allies.
Well, guess what? It's not how this is
working. And I'm this well, this will I
actually, I'll bring this to the end. This
will tie in with some of the later
parts
of whether I think the Israeli government is
trying to trick or
or continue to manipulate
the US government to taking further action. They
we already saw them of of the the
drones that Israel and the US government were
able to use that mimicked Iran drones and
the reality of that that means these bombings
could be anybody. Doesn't mean we should assume
Iran's not capable. We know that they're doing
some of these things, but you should consider
whether some of the more extreme actions might
be something they would think is not strategically
smart.
And only group in this three way dynamic
right now that seems to take strategy
or or, I I mean, human human humanitarian
rights or whatever you wanna talk about as
much as you may not think that if
you're blinded by US politics, the only one
that seems to care about those things right
now. But
Patriot missile involved in the Iran blast, likely
US operated
analysis fines. Sean King writes, now we know
the deadliest missile to hit the country of
Iran
definitely came from The United States. It killed
dozens of citizens in their sleep. The US
is slaughtering people and making enemies all over
the region. I wouldn't say definitely, but I
think that's what the evidence shows.
So
these are not I mean, all around this
conversation, you're seeing things like this happen. Whether
it's oil locations or,
you know, things that I think I want
us to wonder,
ask, whether or not this is about trying
to drive
action.
We'll come back to that.
Gaza model.
Netanyahu,
Katz,
both Israeli government entities, instruct
IDF to strike bridges, homes,
Southern Lebanon.
This is what we're being told. This is
what they're publicly announcing. You're not gonna hear
this anywhere in the Western media.
They literally call it the Gaza model, guys.
Exactly what they pretend they did not do
in Gaza. They're bombing civilian locations. This is
what they call mowing the lawn.
It's amazing. We can't they write these things
down, and we still can't be honest about
it. We all know. It's about choosing to
say it out loud despite what the screaming
idiots in the room say, despite what the
media everywhere lies about. It's obvious. Stop playing
the games. They're bombing civilians because that's what
they do. Here's Horetz,
a leading Israeli newspaper. Quote,
like we did in Gaza,
Israeli defense minister says
IDF ordered to flatten homes in Lebanese border
villages.
But let's keep debating. Like, let's keep, you
know, sit it's just it kills me that
we have to pretend like this is not
obvious.
This is what they've always done my entire
life.
Kudz News Network points to something you might
have seen already. This and I saw this
myself before it was deleted. It wasn't Hebrew.
That's usually how they slide by in these
conversations because they most people don't see it.
And I'm not it's not just about Hebrew,
but the specific conversation of the Israelis writing
in Hebrew, that happens often is my point.
An Israeli academic, Orit Perloff, posted a tweet
in Hebrew, later deleted it, in which she
argued that confronting Iran requires a harsh religious
approach.
Literally targeting Iranian children shouldn't surprise you. Citing
biblical references to killing of newborns, you know,
Amalek, the whole thing. She claims similar tactics
were previously applied in Gaza. We know that's
the truth. Where over 14,000 children were killed
according to UN statistics. It's much more than
that. And suggested applying the same model in
Iran and Lebanon.
She also stated that instead of targeting power
stations,
if top Iranian officials cannot be reached, their
children should be killed.
And this got a lot of reach. No
one's removed her from her job. Not that
I even think they should. Regardless of how
disgusting her statement is, I don't believe people
should be, you know, free speech. I I
believe in it. Regardless of how disgusting she
is for saying it.
The point is that in this country, if
somebody had said this same thing about an
Israeli,
which we would rightly also say you're a
horrifyingly disgusting person, they would
be stoned it's hard and feathered. They'd be
fired from their job. You damn well know
it. Even people that simply say Israel's committing
crimes, getting fired from the job in this
country.
But this kind of casual
genocidal mania is totally okay when it happens
in Israel. Worth thinking about. And that's because
of the government.
Now Amir also points out, according to haaretz.com,
IDF strikes over a 100 medical facilities in
Lebanon, kills forty medical workers. Just another casual
Monday or whatever day it was.
This is the reality, guys.
One bombed hospital might be a horrible mistake,
Amir writes. Two bombed hospitals are undeniably crimes
against humanity. More than a 100 bombed hospitals
in the wor it is the work of
the most effective and barbaric terrorist organization the
world has ever seen.
That is where we
are. If you wanna pretend Iran's a terrorist
organization, go for it. They're a government. Probably
not that far off. But if you cannot
see the difference between what they're alleging Iran
is doing and what Israel is publicly doing
to everyone it can, I don't know what
you're looking at?
Marwa Osmond points out, and this kills me
because they're just using a very expensive munition
just to kill one person because hate, I
would argue.
Israeli army used an icebreaker missile, which, by
the way, the US government in rest funds
in almost every possible way, everything they're doing,
were dumping billions and billions in their hands
so they can waste a $2,000,000 missile to
kill one person walking by themselves completely unarmed.
The video source? The Israeli army. No problem
as long as American taxpayers are footing the
bill.
Just a just a random person in Lebanon.
Again, if you don't understand how common this
is, I don't know what you're watching. There's
no justification for this.
Zachary Foster, pro Israel has killed a Palestinian
child
every hour for two years straight.
And this is, again, with the UN this
is the estimation based on what the there's
still rubble everywhere because they can't even move
it because they removed the ability to do
so. 20,000 children killed in twenty three months
of war, more than one child every hour.
Netanyahu comes out and says, anyone needs any
explanation of why Iran is the enemy of
civilization.
As the enemy and the danger to the
entire world, you got it in the last
forty eight hours. Oh, yeah. Yeah. That was
when they responded to bombings. Right? Or bombed
locations that were literally military targets. Like, for
example, in Tel Aviv, as even John Keir
I
was gonna say Keirakow, not not the former
CIA American guy, but the former military IDF
member, John something. I forget his last name.
It was on Piers Morgan and publicly admitted
it. Even though we know it, Tel Aviv
as literally a human shield dynamic. They built
their base underneath the most central civilian location
in their country.
Now I would still argue that if I
that Iran
if I was any of these groups, I
would not that's not something that I would
fall to.
You know, you could argue, maybe I don't
understand the way war works. Maybe you're right.
At the end of the day, they did
anyway. And you and I disagree with that.
But you can understand why, especially since it's
quite literally by law a military target according
to what they are doing and what the
word the law reality is. Except, I would
argue, if they hadn't done what they've been
doing everywhere, Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, that they Iran
likely would not have done that. Why? Because
they'd be civilians there, and they haven't done
that anywhere else until they were pushed in
these locations.
And then I'm talking about specific military targets
that happen to have civilians or military personnel
and so on.
The reality is, guys, let's just even say
like I said before. Say that they did
exactly what he just said. How are we
gonna pretend like that is the villain with
what the Israeli US governments are doing every
single day around the world? And the point
would be they would both be that. But
that's not where we are, is it?
TRT World. Israeli soldiers torture a one year
old child in Gaza, including burning his leg
with a cigarette and inserting a nail into
his leg, according to report, to pressure his
father to make confessions. Now this comes from
one is, Palestinian
journalist in Gaza, so take it for what
you will. That's to me, that's just as
valid as any other journalist. The fact is
for some people, that means fake because I'm
blind to anything other than Israeli media. But
the point is that more has come out.
More evidence has been developed. At the end
of the day, if you don't think they're
capable of this, you have not been paying
attention.
Now knowing that this is what we're actually
dealing with, and that's a
point o 1% of what I could have
shown you just from today,
here's what Trump came out and said on
the twenty first.
If Iran doesn't fully open without threat,
the Strait Of Hormuz. Now that's why he
said fully, by the way, because they've been
lying about that the entire time, as I've
been telling you, which you all know. It's
you have eyes you could have told. But
note how all of the corporate media and
all of the usual idiot suspects and the
mainstream alternative have been telling you it's been
closed because they parrot what they're told, guys.
It's been opened the entire time. It's been
restricted, as Iran quite literally pointed out, to
Zionists only.
I really answered the US government and their
allies and what they're doing.
Now they as far as I could tell,
as I continue to show everybody, continue to
go through. Now here here's
warships,
which I find interesting, by the way, before
I continue.
All the way over here, you have a
USS
ship,
and then oh, they moved down here.
Ah, they moved. Let me refresh it.
Oh, it did. Okay. It's quick. There were
some down here. I thought that was interesting
seeing as how they were essentially blocking the
bottom end up straight. But you got two
US ships here,
and new SS Michael on the inside up
there.
Now let's get to
all ships
just to show you, because you haven't seen
it, that it's as of right now, clearly
open.
Lots of traffic,
but is being restricted to bay mainly US
and Israel, which is causing them tremendous problems.
And they want the world to think that
it's their problems, but it's not. Iran played
this very well. And so that's why they
tried to make you think that it was
closed because they wanted the rest of the
world to think they had to act because
that being closed for the world would be
a huge problem.
But it's only a huge problem for The
US and Israel largely right now. And that's
why this tact has worked very well for
them.
But so it says, if you don't open
fully without threat, the spirit of Hormuz, within
forty eight hours,
from this exact point in time, which I
laugh because he's done this, like, six times.
And he he's all bluster. And, by the
way, that does not mean he's not capable.
You damn well know he's capable of saying
that and embalming within one hour. It's the
same thing Israel does. The point, though, is
he often blusters with no follow through. I've
seen it countless times doing exactly this with
Venezuela. We have plenty of examples. But look,
I mean, same thing. Look at how it
ended up, right? So, you could argue. The
point is just to realize that there's a
lot of things like this that are just
kind of weakness of displays of weakness.
And don't always mean, like I said, just
strength or military power, but more of a
weakness of, you know,
you know what I mean? Plenty of other
types of weakness. Somebody has to scream they're
powerful or constantly threaten everybody to get what
they want is not really that strong. United
States Of America will hit and obliterate their
various power plants, which, by the way, are
crimes.
This is my same point. That's a crime.
If Iran doesn't, it's a crime. These are
not military targets. You don't just get to
go put they use it for military things.
There there is civilian infrastructure, and then there
is military targets.
It's not like they care any of them,
by the way. That's the whole point. But
recognize that him doing that by setting the
standard is he basically saying, I'm threatening a
war crime if you don't capitulate.
And doing something that that is not a
crime, by the way.
Starting with the biggest one first. Right? So
what that means is hurting civilians. We will
attack your civilian population with your energy,
like they always do.
Glenn says liberating the Iranian people by bombing
their oil refineries, poisoning their air, destroying their
freshwater supplies, exploding their elementary schools, and now
obliterating their power plants. Who wouldn't be grateful
for this?
This is how stupid this is. Is anybody
even still pretending like that's what it was
about? No. No. They've gotten rid of this
whole where they've moved away from saving Iran
because nobody in that country wants their saving.
Right? So they've just moved into power because
bad guy terrorism, nukes, or whatever. Whatever whichever
one you wanna take.
It's not working.
Because remember, guys, Iranian or Americans didn't want
this in the first place. Not Republicans, not
Democrats,
at least out of the government. All of
the government wants this. This is a point
that you need to hear.
I wasn't even aware of this until I
looked this up, and this is correct.
TMT,
I'm not familiar with. Give him a follow-up
for this. The Iranian foreign minister addressing the
world.
Now, honestly, I'm not even sure if he
said this. The point for me is just
that this is real. This is an accurate
point that I was blown away to understand
how much this frames the the way everything
works in a different way. The Iranian foreign
minister addressing the world
says, let me get this one thing straight,
or at least just this is the sentiment.
Egypt charges
hundreds of thousand dollars per transit through the
Suez Canal.
Large container ships of tankers, they claim, has
exceeds a million dollars. I did look into
it. It is very expensive.
Panama charges hundreds of thousand dollars per transit.
Turkey charges for the, what is it, Bosporus
Strait? Canada charges for the Saint Louis Seaway.
Can you see where this is going? The
United States charges
for ships to pass through the Saint Louis
Seaway.
Iran, however, has refused to collect fees for
the Strait Of Hormuz for decades.
They made it free.
Despite the defamation, the sanctions, the isolation, and
yet you want me to believe he writes
that Iran is the bad guy here?
They very well could be. The point though
is think about how different that is. How
are we gonna pretend that they're the monster
terrorist pirate that's been holding the world hostage
with the Strait Of Hormuz when they're not
even charging anybody
when everybody else is? I mean, it just
seems so stupid to me. And now for
the first time in a long time, they're
stepping in to try to stop some flow
because of the way that they're being manipulated.
And that makes them the one in the
wrong?
Don't you find that crazy? Like, these are
things like, how do we not all know
that? Maybe you guys do. I hadn't heard
that before. And it's all because these little
select facts, they it's important. And it shows
you the real picture, I would argue.
And that again does not mean good guy,
bad guy. Guys,
now
shadow of Ezra points out what Mark Levin
and Maria Bartolomo Sarah Bart Bartiromo. How do
you say that? Bartiromo.
I thought it was Bartiromo with an L.
Anyway,
talk basically getting all excited about taking the
oil, which is always how this goes.
I mean, look, even if this was everything
they said, let's say they're all terrorists and
they're getting the bad guys out of the
way.
Why is it every time and I mean,
I don't you know the answer to this,
that they feel it's somehow the like, you
can almost see the excitement. We're gonna get
the we get influence over the oil. Why?
Why would that even remotely be the case?
Why did why did you just all of
a sudden just steal from Venezuela the moment
you drink? Because you do every single time.
Is that what Venezuelans want? No. Does that
benefit Venezuelan Venezuelans? No. It does not.
What it does benefits the corporations that are
around Trump and the people that profit from
his regime, Jay. It does not help the
people they claim they're trying to save.
Oh, and let's just even say let's move
that point aside entirely. Let's even say it
does. Is it legal?
Is it against the law, or is it
within the law for the US government to
regime change a country and alleged to put
somebody now in power who allegedly runs the
country and then just take what they want
afterward?
No. It is not. Don't think that should
be hard to wrap your mind around. But
this is what they do every single time
because they go, we're the good guys, and
we're trying to save the world by raping
and stealing and torturing and collapsing countries and
assassinating people and, you know, shoving star yeah.
It used to go off forever. It's just
insane.
The the lies we tell ourselves within the
mainstream community.
I'll play this first, then I'll read what
Daniel says here.
Tenemies defeated,
and there's some level of change in the
government. Oh, in case you didn't catch on,
it's they're they won already. It's over. They're
defeated. And said they're done. We win. You
know? Now, frankly, I think that there's more
to the statement, but you've seen that already.
Trump has already claimed they won, but there's
more to do. Israel came out and said,
we won already, but we're not done with
everything yet.
You wouldn't say that unless you thought you
needed to. I mean, really. Like, we if
you just to me, that's one of the
largest reasons why I sense weakness in this,
which would not suggest that they're about to
win this tomorrow, which we'll get into with
this the next argument.
Amen.
Pray to god.
We would have a lot of say about
that oil, wouldn't we? Just like we have
a lot of say about the oil in
Venezuela. No? Why? Yeah. We Why?
What legal reality is there that says the
US government can say anything about what Venezuelan's
government does with their oil? Now you can
argue
that you could simply suggest things and their
benefit, and they could take their own actions.
But let's not be silly, guys. We know
that's not what's happening. It didn't happen in
Iraq. It didn't happen in Syria. It didn't
happen anywhere. I can still show you the
the clips of them driving the oil out
of Syria in those US tankers.
I showed it then, and they got the
same
flying people that said that's not real. You're
a liar.
It is, and it was just like every
other one of them. We'll have a lot
of say
about that oil for sure, but let's not
forget the fact that The United States is
an independent
oil and gas exporter.
And that's also really important to remember because
that's part of this president's agenda. Oh, okay.
In case you didn't catch on, we just
shifted into an advertisement.
Guess what? Trump's the greatest, and this is
what we're gonna do forever.
Okay. Cool. I think we're what does that
have to do with the point? It's just
funny. It's we're doing so great, and guess
what? When we steal Iran's oil To tap
into the capacity of America. And when you're
talking about all that oil coming onto the
market and all that gas coming into the
market Illegally. Simple supply and demand. Oh, yeah.
Oil prices and gas prices will go down.
Okay. So
and justify the means.
We'll rob, steal, and torture, but your gas
price will go down. Trump promises kept, says
Donald Trump.
Who cares if we weasel through 13 different
agendas and everything else fell apart? But with
the end, oh, it went down about half
a cent. It went up thousands of dollars.
It came back down. I'm just kind of
being facetious, but realize, why does that make
sense to anybody? So you get some cheaper
gas? So it's okay to ignore that we're
just ruining places around the world and stealing
and I just it's wrong, guys.
And and maybe that doesn't matter to you.
That's fine. We can you can I don't
care? I'm like Stephen Miller. Take what I
want because we're strong. Well, then you're a
terrible person.
That's the reality. We can disagree, but let's
own what we are. If we wanna if
you wanna go out and do that, then
then per don't pretend you care about the
constitution. Don't pretend you care about the law
or your rights or anything else you talk
about. Just be honest that we want we
want no matter what. Shut up. Then I'll
okay. Hey. Fair enough. That's your argument. It's
not what we're doing, though.
So he says, do you realize what Maria
is saying here in Mark Levin? They seem
to be revealing in an imperial America's revealing
reval reveling, excuse me, in an imperial America
seizing the oil from Venezuela by force. That's
exactly the point. And they imagine they're going
to steal it from Iran and as well,
and then use it to leverage against China.
Now realize this is what they're genuinely trying
to change, not just one side or the
other, but all of them. They're driving us
to a point to where we're just more
comfortable
with imperialism, with authoritarianism, with CEO run countries
that do what's right for us no matter
what our rights, you know, that's that's what
they want.
Because that leads to a place where eventually
they just go, what what was that again?
Constitution?
Sit down. That that's that's what they're already
doing.
But when they're driving us to a place
to where they just go, this is what's
best for us. Is it?
Has it worked out? They told us Iraq
was best for us too.
But, of course, Lauren Witsy points out Witsky,
excuse me, points out, you know, the the
two weeks to flatten the curve, the same
game or or take it on the chin
for Ukraine.
They all they all made fun of and
rightly so. Well, here's the republican version of
that.
Is the oil prices people just need to
stop panicking? It's worth it to prevent Iran
from having a nuclear weapon? Those are the
same prices they swore would never go up
because Trump's he'll promise his caps, and he's
winning. And then it does, well, shut up.
It's because we need to. That's typical left
and right. So if I have to pay
a little bit more for gas, I'll do
Pay the price. I mean, in order to
have long term stability The disruptions in the
global markets are real and may be painful,
but the long term benefits, again, are incalculable.
There may be some sacrifices to be made
at the pump on a temporary basis. I'm
willing to pay 30%
or 30¢ more at the pump to make
sure that Iran does not have a nuclear
weapon. To win You know, the same claim
despite them each having a different claim for
the most part. That's not true. We can
all prove that.
And in life, you gotta suffer short term
pain for the long term gain or short
term pain for long term gain. Freedom is
not free. Americans He literally just said freedom
is not free. America are gonna have to
make some sacrifices. This is short term, and
I'm asking you to just trust the man.
Okay? Trust the system. Let him Yeah. Did
you did you miss that one, guys? Hashtag
trust the plan. It's coming back.
So what he just said? He literally just
said that. Just trust the man plan man
man plan with the plan.
Here we
are. I can't believe we actually freedom isn't
free. I mean, are we just going back
to, like, square one, like, the oldest, we're
most ridiculous, most blame apparently, they don't know
what else to do. So Trump says the
Strait Of Hormuz will be under joint control.
Maybe. Maybe him, maybe the new Ayatollah. But
yeah. See, same thing. Apparently, we're just seizing
control things. We're not even thinking about the
reality of legality because that's who they are.
Thank you. And what about the Strait Of
Hormuz? Who's gonna be in control of that?
Be open very soon if this works. How
soon?
Well, it's open now just in case you
were confused. And who is in control of
it? Will a god still be able to
control the flow of oil?
Be, jointly controlled.
By who?
Maybe me. Maybe me. About The United States.
We have a god. And the Ayatollah, whoever
the Ayatollah is. Yeah. Trump for life, apparently.
Emperor for life, Board of Peace. Maybe me
forever.
Like, this is not a secret that he's
trying to create systems like this that end
up keeping power in his hands well beyond
the presidency.
That's not even a secret, guys. I mean,
these are very clear. He is emperor for
life or whatever you wanna call it, chairman
for life of the board of peace. That's
his statement. That's what you can look up
for yourself. Jared Kushner, Whitcough,
Tony Blair for crying out loud. Now this
may not relate.
We're thinking about, though.
Maybe me. Maybe me. You want The United
States to be Me and the Ayatollah, whoever
the Ayatollah is, whoever the next Ayatollah Yeah.
You know, the guy Israel from the also
be a form of a a very serious
form of a regime
change. Now in all fairness,
everybody's been killed from regime change. Didn't we
don't want regime change. How dare you guys
keep talking about regime change? It's a form
of regime change. This is why people laugh
at this because yesterday's argument of why you're
wrong becomes the today's statement of fact.
And yet you can go back and go,
but he just said yesterday that's not the
case. And the people that don't wanna hear
it don't wanna hear it. Doesn't matter. I
argue most are aware.
The regime. They're really starting off. There's automatically
a regime change. But we're dealing with some
people
that I find to be very reasonable.
Okay. Okay. Here we get into the point.
Oh, he's dealing with people. Okay. Well, that's
being denied. We'll go through all of this.
So the real question to start is whether
he's actually talking to somebody.
Is it an Iranian?
Is it is it Israeli on the phone
pretending to be Iranian? Is it an Iranian
who is not actually working for the Iranian
government? Or is it an Iranian government element
that's fucking the Iranian government stance?
I all those are possible.
It's solid.
The people within know who they are. They're
very respected,
and maybe one of them will be exactly
what we're looking for. Look at Venezuela.
By the way, it would mean the US
government gets to handpick who they claim is
the democratic leader of Iran.
Worth laughing about how dumb that statement is,
but that's what they put out. The Shah
is the prince the crown prince of democracy.
They don't even try anymore. Oh, well, that's
working
out. We are doing so well in Venezuela
with oil and with the relationship
between the president-elect
and us. Yes. Yes. That's it. That's all
that matters. Right? Delsey, who we handpicked and
put there, despite her being a part of
it, who seems to be the one who
allowed this all to come down,
was, you know, speaking out about standing up
and then just cowed. And here, access to
our oil. Yeah. Exactly.
Like I said, how it ended up would
show us a lot. Now, I can't speak
to whether Delsey Rodriguez was knowingly part of
this. It could say like I said before,
it could be that she thought, you know,
that if she didn't, they would just do
what they always do, destroy everything and hurt
all their people. And she maybe even her
Maduro was like, look, just they're gonna get
this. We've already realized they're gonna come take
me. So, just capitulate.
Otherwise, they'll destroy everything. I mean, look, you
have to be able to see, despite the
stupid narrative from our government, like with every
other location, Bolivia, Venezuela, everywhere, Iran.
They do not treat their people the way
they claim. They exploit them like any government
does, I would argue, and plenty of examples.
But look at what you can see on
the ground, like with Maduro and his people
or, as I just showed you, Iranian's president
walking through his people or Assad wandering through.
These people were wildly mischaracterized. That doesn't mean
good guy. But, clearly, they are not hated
the way they claim.
That's very important to think about because the
reality is they've turned this over to groups
that are outselling their country out to the
highest bidder. And Venezuela will now genuinely fall
into like, look at what we see in
Iraq or Syria or anywhere else, guys. Does
that is that freedom or liberation? Ask Libya
how that worked out. So even though even
though they were starving due to US sanctions,
it was not their policy,
now you're turned into a situation where you're
forever in that position. It's forever destabilized and
suffering and slums as the elitist live at
the top, like the Shah before they took
their country back in Iran.
And
maybe we find somebody like that in Iran.
Are you
Yeah. Somebody who we can manipulate is the
point.
It's what they want, guys. I don't know
why anybody thinks otherwise. It's their it's like
their written down policy for crying out loud.
So before we get into the statements that
continue from there, I thought it's important to
go back a couple of days and hear
the narratives that built up. K? So this
is from the March 1. Important to understand
this. This is just one sentence, one statement
that I want you to hear because it's
important.
Iran and this is just a sentiment from
their government, but I believe this was the,
a professor in the university
of Tehran. And, basically, this is a sentiment
that's been expressed by their leadership.
Iran learned a hard lesson from the June,
the so called twelve day war.
Restraint,
which Iran has shown its in my entire
life. Like, whether you think it's for some
evil tactic or whatever you think it is,
they've shown restraint
more times than I can count, where The
US and Israel would have bombed relentlessly and
killed as many people as they could. And
they show restraint in Syria, in in plenty
of locations when when that was the overlap.
Right? And, like, bombing in Iraq's,
p Iraq's US base, for example, instead of
bombing The US when or in this circumstance,
when The US is literally bombing in the
the Iranian government in Tehran, in Iran,
the US government, not just through an then
they would have the legal right to bomb
the US gov The US? I hope to
God that doesn't happen. The point is they
chose not to because they know how that
would be turned around. But they had the
legal right. So if they were these belligerent
terrorists, you're telling me you gave them the
legal opening to do everything you claim they've
always wanted to do and they just didn't
because
they chose not to?
So so it sounds like the Strait Of
Hormuz point. Right? So maybe they're not what
they're claiming, but the point is Iran learned
a hard lesson. Restraint is interpreted
as weakness,
you know, by bullies, by belligerents who we're
talking about. The new calculus in Tehran is
likely to be a scorched earth policy. That's
his opinion.
I don't believe that's even what they're demonstrating,
but it's showing you that they're not going
to just try to find some way to
roll it back because they will never let
that happen. Israel's shown that in their entire
life. I'm surprised it took this long.
The decision has been made. If attacked, Iran
will burn everything, he said. But even then,
they're proving that's not true because they're still
showing the restraint when it comes to the
legal line,
International law. But that was March 1. Then
we've got also March 1. Don't forget, a
US official
via mediator made it public. Now this was
okay. So March 1, we saw this it
was, like, over, I think, the last twenty
four hours, we saw this kickoff.
A mediator proposed an immediate ceasefire. Now right
there, you have to ask this why. It's
also possible this was lied about, but I
I think this has been route this has
been,
backed up by numerous sources,
which is the idea that immediately Donald Trump
tried at least somebody with administration, at the
very least, tried to offer a ceasefire that
Iran outright rejected. This is according to Israeli
media.
According to one source, an an American official
conveyed an even more immediate proposal
through a mediator, apparently Italy.
He suggested reaching a ceasefire agreement today or
tomorrow.
Iran rejected the idea outright,
showing you anything but weakness, or at the
very least determined not to knowing that if
they did, that they would just get bombed
again. Every time they've shown that.
So understand, what it shows right there is
either Trump being aware he was being played
or at least at least coming to terms
with maybe he was not led in the
right direction and offers a ceasefire, or somebody
else around him did it, showing you that
they knew this was going in the wrong
direction and we didn't hear about that.
Ceasefire. Okay? So they turned it down, which
he got mad about. He responded later going,
no ceasefire ever, which is what he does.
Trump says no deal with Iran
in Iran without unconditional
surrender until today. Right? Like, that's that's how
this tends to go. Never ever ever until
I decide to, and now we're gonna do
it.
IDF says it destroyed community's bunker. Okay.
This is March 7.
So no deal.
That's right now, we're claiming Trump's claiming they're
in a five d five day ceasefire.
Trump says no deal with that unconditional surrender.
March 7.
So clearly, that's not true. So here's on
March 22, the day before, to to yesterday.
This is what the Iranian foreign minister had
to say. Now remember, this is coming off
the point where they said, look. We're we're
done dealing with you guys, and here's why.
You you bombed us. Last time we came
to a deal and a we're in the
room. Kamini, everybody, you bombed the room we
were dealing in. We all should know that
by now. That's what actually happened. Here he
is telling you. I think,
the,
the question of,
talking with Americans or negotiation with Americans once
again,
would be on on the table because,
you know, we have a very,
you know, bitter experience of of talking with
Americans.
We negotiated with them last year in in
last June, and they attacked us in the
middle of negotiations. And again this year,
they tried to convince That's the foreign minister
of Oman right there. Us that this time
is different. They promised us that they don't
have any intention to attack us. So and
they wanted to resolve the Iran's nuclear question
peacefully,
and to find a negotiated solution. And we
we finally accept it. But again See. And
right there, now you could argue it's all
lies. But hypothetically, for sake of conversation, what
does that show you?
Right? That these people who they want you
to believe are villain, terrorist, monster, whatever, extremist,
continue to see a possibility
even from the groups that we know better,
that we know what they're really doing all
over the world. And even they are like,
let's find let's just give them an opportunity
to maybe maybe Witkoff and Jared Kushner are
different. Nope.
That's and realize the the level of dishonesty
that these people are just gushing, oh, we're
gonna find a solution, and they know what
they're already planning to do.
But just think about that. Is that the
representation of what they want you to think
they are? A group that's
constantly trying to find middle ground, constantly trying
to come to the table? And as always,
that doesn't mean good guy. It just means
it's not what they're claiming they are at
the very least.
After three rounds of negotiation
and to resolve the Iran's nuclear question
peacefully,
and to find a negotiated solution, and we
we finally accept it. But again, after three
rounds of negotiation, and after the the American
team in the negotiation,
you know,
said itself that we made a big progress.
Still, they decided to attack us. Mhmm. So
I don't think, you know, talking with Americans
anymore,
would be,
you know, on on our agenda anymore.
K. I I don't I does anybody not
understand that?
You could argue whether you could argue that's
not the the truth, but
logic wise,
they kept trying to deal with them, and
every time, they just bombed them anyway. I
said this with the with the Houthis in
the past, with Saudi Arabia. Why would anybody
keep dealing with somebody who every time is
a deal, like with Gaza? It's the same
thing. Gaza's a little different because they didn't
have any other choice. They're they're in a
literally in an open air prison. They have
only one group to deal with at that
point. And so they kept at least trying
and they played them multiple times by accepting
things they knew they weren't ready to give.
And then once they accepted, they bomb them
back anyway. How many times do we see
Blinken come out and go, it's up to
them even though we just saw them accept?
Or the same thing afterward with,
you know, with the US government. It's the
same point either way.
So this is obvious.
As, Kyle here says, told you, Trump's signature
move, and I agree with this regardless of
whether Kyle's partisan, which he is, Trump's signature
move is fake negotiations
leading to murder. He did it with Soleimani?
Correct. I've said every time. That was the
authorization of use of military force. They argued
they had legal right to maneuver in Iraq
if there was destabilizing factors.
So they literally, and this is the way
I interpret this, but this was the current
reality of the legalities,
invite him under the guise of diplomacy in
Iraq. He lands in Iraq and they bomb
him the minute he lands in Iraq
because I argue they thought that would give
them legal cover. But either way, they murdered
him under the guise of diplomacy.
And Soleimani, guys, is probably the least terroristic
of all the ones we're discussing. He was
a very highly respected person in the conversation,
as always. That is not good guy. I'm
not gonna speak to the moral reality of
somebody, especially not somebody who's no longer here,
but it is not what they claimed. And
the guy was very highly respected
and, in fact, was the one fighting ISIS
when the US government was arming him, so
you could work that out for yourself. He
did it during the twelve day war as
well, Trump and Netanyahu. Why would anybody negotiate
with them and take their words? He says,
Us. Gotta stop framing it that way, guys.
They are not us. Or even do a
treaty with them. Trump just ripped them up.
I've said that and not just Trump, Biden,
all the rest. He probably thinks differently of
Biden, which shows you the hole there. The
point is our government is the same.
Why would anybody deal with them?
Now here's what he said on the twentieth.
We are getting very close to meeting our
objectives as we consider winding down our great
military efforts in The Middle East with respect
to the terrorist regime of Iran.
Okay?
We are getting very close to our I
mean, guys, that was said in the very
beginning. They've already missed their marks. Like, this
is just an embarrassing extension. They have not
accomplished anything they claim they're trying to accomplish.
And I just said, this is just sad.
This is just you just pandering. We're doing
everything. We're winning. It's like always.
So on the twentieth, right, here's also on
the twentieth.
Now, again, you could argue that this might
even be the reality if what it meant
was we're speaking with somebody in Iran and
that we might almost be ready to make
a deal, and he'll turn on their government,
and we'll take control.
We'll be finding out quite soon, I argue.
But
I've sensed the opposite in all of this,
especially since when you get these kind of
these kind of statements, it just doesn't feel
like it rings true, especially with what I
just showed you of them saying, you know,
no deal whatsoever, but now we are or,
you know, these different contradicting statements.
Here's what percent had to say.
This is nonsense,
Maria. You know, for for the regime, you
know, we're back back to the stuff of
Baghdad Bob here. All that really means is
a guy in the military who was reporting,
you know, we're winning and we're never gonna
be veiled and we're never when they didn't,
right, ultimately lost. So at the end of
the day, the argument becomes
false reporting about what's going on in the
war, which by the way, that's every piece
from every side all the time. I don't
mean all, like, entirely whole cloth,
but we must know that by now. And
what do I say every time? A bombing
takes place. They go, We killed a thousand.
One of them goes, None was killed. It's
probably 500.
Every time we see this. So in this
case, the idea that what you're hearing, in
many cases, are things I can prove to
you are true. He just wants you to
dismiss it offhand because we're the greatest ever
and we're winning. But he goes on. So
I just wanna explain what Bob or bag
Baghdad Bob meant, Just military misinformation.
Yeah. The the the regime is in collapse,
and the people Maybe. Right? But does that
what is there any indication other than what
they want you to think? Are they collapsing?
I mean, okay. Here's the thing. If the
regime is in collapse, then why are they
working with somebody in the regime to let
them maintain power when they just rush in
and take control? I mean, because this that
does not make sense. So at the very
least, they're trying to give you a more
of an impression of, like, utter almost collapse,
maybe with the intention of getting somebody over
there to turn. See, that's how this works,
but they're lying to you to do that
in hopes that somebody in the government might
think that's the truth and then decide to
join Trump and turn on his own people.
They tried to do that in Venezuela the
last time and failed.
I'm not even sure the reality of how
it worked down with Venezuela this last time.
I honestly think they just threatened and did,
you know, dirty tactics.
Are starting to turn against them. We're starting
to see defections.
At at treasury,
we now know where the Iranian leadership bank
accounts
are. The Do you really believe that? Do
you really believe that with what they know,
as we just heard,
the endless
decades of sanctions and manipulation that they would
just allow it to be that accessible? Just
a bank account they can get access to?
I don't believe that, but who knows?
And, those are being frozen.
And, we we will we will hold them
and see,
who comes forward
in terms of defections, but we're What What
that means is we'll give you the money
that we stole if you come forward and
take that's that's a that's a bribe.
Well, we're gonna earn money. We're not gonna
lose it on our side. Starting to see
defections,
the, throughout the regime, and that that's how
this ends. So, you know, the idea of
some tolling arrangement
is ridiculous what president Trump is talking about.
What they're trying to say is they might
come to some middle ground about the straight
and stuff like that. Like, they just need
they're just projecting. We're gonna win at all
cost no matter what.
I get the sense that that's the opposite.
And to be clear, he has focused on
Kharg Island since 1988
before the Shaw fell that that that The
US,
they should,
be focused on that. He is What that
means is we should steal
the island because they've got most of their
oil there. I mean, they're not even hiding
us anymore. We are just these are criminal
gangsters. These are pirates, the real pirates.
Not even hiding it.
But because they yell freedom, I guess it's
okay. Laser focus on it. As I said,
there was a bombing campaign last week. The
military
assets on Cargill and were destroyed. And, you
know, the other thing I can tell you,
if you're in And allegedly, they put boots
on the ground, but nobody they're not gonna
admit that. Oil worker, you don't wanna work
there. So all the oil workers are being
coerced
to stay there. And, you know, we we
we will see Yes. I mean, why would
that even be the reality? So you're, like,
chaining people to work in their facilities?
You know, it's this is just I mean,
certainly possible. But with knowing they've lied about
everything our entire lives, maybe we should wonder
whether this is also not true.
Just a just a thought.
I mean, genuinely, it certainly could be. But
this is the thing is we have to
start flavoring this with some salt, guys. These
people will lie to you. But, of course,
you get the partisan report,
WAR, hashtag, colon, the war is going so
well for Iran, its remaining leaders are fleeing
the country, says Amuz.
Right. Just the count that, I guess, blindly
repeats what percent said because he's often correct.
No, he's not. I mean, come on, guys.
Like, this if you're gonna be the new
media, then you can say Besent claims they're
about to collapse. And here's why I think
that's an evidence bastard. No. They said it.
We're winning.
I mean, this this is gonna be 700,000
followers.
And when's the last time you heard a
government official rattle something off on Fox News
and it turned out to be entirely correct?
Entirely correct. They say things that are slightly
correct, but they're lying every time they open
their mouths. Now
Trump on the twentieth said, I don't want
to do a ceasefire
in the Iran war. And then, I guess,
three days later said, ceasefire sounds good. But
he says, quote, we have we could have
dialogue on the twentieth, but I don't wanna
do a ceasefire, Trump said from the White
House before departing from Florida. Of course, he
can change his mind. Right? But he says,
you know you don't do a ceasefire when
you're literally obliterating the other side. That's the
point.
Okay. So, hypothetically,
if he's correct and he's literally obliterating the
other side,
somebody tell me why he's claiming he just
went to a five day ceasefire.
Right? I mean, if if you are up
there, then you could argue both at work.
Maybe he lied here to push that, and
then he got is what he wanted over
there. That's possible. But recognize that it seems
pretty clear that there's something in the middle
there, that they're not obliterating everything. Like, he
didn't obliterate their nuclear facilities. Right?
And if that's the truth, then maybe wonder
whether the entire thing is a lie and
that they're all lying to to hide weakness.
Quote, they don't have any navy. They don't
have any air force. They don't have any
equipment. Trump continued. Okay.
No ceasefire.
Okay. Next part of the story.
Oh, again. So the one day yesterday, Trump
threatens to obliterate their power unless they fully
open the straight back to the starting, and
then
Trump warns total decimation is coming.
Yesterday after straight over moves threat. They're getting
their comeuppance.
So you realize that, like, hours before we
got to this point, he was literally threatening.
They're gonna get what's coming to them. I
just don't I feel like this is kind
of hard to take seriously.
And, again, still the twenty second, mind you.
Twenty third is where we get into the
argument of this happening.
Neera Krauss, a Zionist journalist in Israel, says
I had a phone call with Trump about
Iran. Here's what he said. Quote, it's from
the same article. You'll find out what's gonna
happen.
When they cave into the ultimatum,
you're gonna find out soon.
It's going to be very good.
Total decimation of Iran.
K. That, again, that means every decimation, but,
you know, he's just Trump's hyperbolic and bombastic,
so he may just mean we're gonna kill
the military
things.
But if he if he's not being bomb
decimation of Iran would mean everything. I mean,
the houses and the people and the dog
you know, the amulet, you know, whole
thing, which is what Israel wants. But let's
just pretend, as for he's just
being, I guess,
dishonest is the right word. It's gonna work
out very good.
Gotta love that. Total decimation of Iran. It's
gonna be great.
About NATO countries, they're not doing anything. It's
too bad. They've been very bad for forty
seven years.
I guess NATO or Iran? Well, I guess
we can guess. Now, they're getting a comeuppance.
Hey, man, Iran.
Okay. So you're telling me that yesterday,
according to her, question that, he says
it's gonna be big. You're gonna find out,
and they're gonna be destroyed.
So kinda think that doesn't mean a five
day ceasefire.
Right?
You can decide, or maybe that was a
lie to get us here. Now,
early, this is what he came out and
said in front of,
these military personnel behind him.
Their leaders are all gone.
The next set of They're not though, by
the way. Leaders are all gone. Incorrect.
And the next set of leaders are mostly
gone. Incorrect.
I mean, you've literally had one change. You
got the one guy who's the I mean,
there's rumors, which I haven't gotten into because
nobody can verify anything, that he's not responding
to anybody and he's not even in charge,
or this one says he's dead, or this
one says he fled to some other country.
It's the same thing they do every time.
They said the same things every time.
But, again,
you didn't need to right there. He could've
just said, we killed the leader, and now
they're in trouble. Nobody he he made three
he had to say we killed them all,
and then we killed them all again, and
then we killed them all again.
Why would you just flatly lie about that?
You realize that not even they have reported
that. This is what he's saying off the
cuff in front of these people.
Their leaders are all gone.
The next set of leaders are all gone,
and the next set of leaders are mostly
gone. But that's, again, that's that's diplomacy.
Right? And not totally war crimes, illegal action
with no declaration of war.
And now nobody wants to be a leader
over there anymore. Except the guy who's currently
in charge. We're having a hard time. We
wanna
talk to them, and there's nobody to talk
to.
Okay. Well, that's interesting. Seeing as how they
have told you they're not going to because
you always lie and bomb them in the
middle of negotiations.
We have nobody to talk to. Nobody to
talk to. You know what? We like it
that way.
Okay.
Well, suddenly,
hours later,
we're talking to somebody, and we just made
a deal.
Now as he writes, that I I could
see a world in which that is a
ploy. It's also being dishonest to everybody, but
that's war, I guess, they say. There has
probably never been, he says, a more blatant
example of market manipulation in sight. Three days
ago, Trump said there was nobody to in
or talk to in Iran. Now just before
the markets opened, he says talks are happening,
which we're gonna get into. That's the point
today. But they are striking and still, which
we'll get into in a second, by the
way,
despite the claim
that we are pleased to report
that they have
had good talks over the last two days
where he told you they couldn't talk to
anybody just then,
that they are still bombing.
I'm gonna end with that, but make sure
you hear me on that. We're pleased to
announce, he writes, pleased to report that The
United States Of America and the country of
Iran have had, over the last two days,
yeah, we just went over that time frame,
very good and productive conversations regarding a complete
and total resolution of our hostilities in The
Middle East. Does
that sound like it makes sense with what
we're talking about? But it could be. Based
on the tenor and tone
of these in-depth,
detailed, and constructive conversations,
laying it out a little thick, I think.
Which
which
Okay. Well, it's not worth fixating on the
fact that he wrote w I t c
h, but, you know, whatever.
Will continue throughout the week. God, we're so
doomed. I have instructed
Department of War to postpone any and all
military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy
infrastructure, all of which would have been crimes,
no matter what you spun it as,
for five days.
Meeting and discussion. Thank you. That's a cease
that's a five day ceasefire. That's what that
means.
Somebody's got has anybody made fun of him
using the wrong word? I think sure somebody
has. Now
the point here
before I hold on oh, yeah. Yeah. But
before we continue is to make sure you
understand. So he says this today.
I'll show you at the end, and you
should it's easy to look.
Israel has carried on bombing to this moment
as far as I can tell, which
makes its own point, which we'll finish with,
that Israel is not gonna let this end
regardless of what Trump says. But two,
guess who else has continued bombing?
The US military.
So there's only two ways to take that.
Now you could argue, well, I guess three.
One is
he's not in charge.
Two is that he lied to you.
Three is that there was some sort of
overlap, where they had to finish these ones
and they're gonna stop after that, which,
that Israel tried to do something similar, it's
ridiculous. If they wanted to, they could go
stop, and they would stop.
But keep this in mind as we go
forward.
So here's what you get.
Trump says Iran wants to make a deal,
but Iran
denies it.
So it's pretty simple. Right? So this is
you could this could be
political military maneuvering to try to get a
certain outcome.
Of course, Eric Daugherty, the the holy crap
team, says, Trump just said he's postponed all
attacks. And I just have to laugh.
He says, he's really gonna do it.
Woo. With a flag with a just I
just I can't I can't stop laughing.
Like, let me put it this way.
Why do these people who are framing themselves
as, like, the new media who think they're
so poor, why do they have to make
it so juvenile?
You know what I mean? Like, holy crap.
And the lights and the you know, it's
just it's it's like you're dealing do you
have to act like a second grader while
you're making this stuff done? I maybe so.
Maybe that's the drive. I don't know.
Peacemaker in chief is hard work.
You mean the guy who started the illegal
war with Iran? You you're not a peacemaker
when you end a war you start, dummy.
But they don't care. It's not about the
information.
I just think we I we need to
recognize that this game and all of it.
But, of course, he then Tyrone wants deal
badly.
That's it's quickly. It's funny how that escalated
quickly. It starts out, well, we might have
a deal, and we have some time. We're
gonna now it's they want a bad deal
so bad. Well, how many times have I
shown you him doing that that was not
true?
Everyone meant a deal. Please try to make
a deal with me, and it didn't it
wasn't true, guys. I can prove to you
that that wasn't true. But he said it
because he wanted you to think that he
was the dealmaker that was gonna make all
the world leaders, well, look at where we
are. They do not respect
him. Now they they're afraid of his belligerence.
That's for sure. But Iran calls BS as
Trump claims Iran talks are underway.
Now, again, the real point is just that
he said I'm, you know, pleased to report
that
we're in a five days ceasefire and have
been talking for the last two days, so
effectively three day period.
Based on the tenor and tone of the
in-depth and detailed
blah blah blah, we're going to
pause.
So here is the response.
Iran says there's been zero dialogue. Zero dialogue
between Trump and or Tehran and Washington.
Here's where mayor, Maria steps in and says,
I spoke to Trump on the phone. Here's
what he says. And it's just that
I will let it all speak for itself.
Come back. I just spoke with president Trump,
and he told me that Iran wants to
make a deal badly.
He said that the talks have been ongoing.
I said, how much longer will this conflict
go on? He said the talks, I said
five days,
to, halt or postpone
strikes on the electrical
infrastructure.
It could happen sooner, he said, but I
have put down five days. I asked him
what his reaction is to Iranian
state television
saying that there are no talks, and he
said he's not sure what they are referring
to because the most recent talks
happened, in fact, last night with Steve Witkoff
and Jared Kushner and their counterparts. When I
asked about the Iranian TV saying that no
talks have happened, he said it's hard to
get any information
there because of The US's,
blowing up so much of their infrastructure.
So, again, he wasn't sure whether Iran's state
TV was talking about because the most recent
talks, he said, happened last night with Steve
Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Again, the president just
told me moments ago
that the Iranians
want to do a deal badly.
The market, of course, has reversed course this
morning after the president posted,
this morning in the middle of a big
decline in markets. He said that he has
directed the military
to postpone
strikes
on the electrical infrastructure and the power plants
for five days as these talks continue. The
So,
essentially, just Trump said no.
You know, I don't know what they're talking
about. So it's just it was not it
was kind of a non answer. Right? So
he says, I don't know. But it kinda
leaves open that reality.
So she's pointing to all the
few US futures. Like, it's it's I don't
know why they think this makes sense to
people. Look, let's be clear. The people that
are
in the elitist circles, the people who are
actually benefiting from what Trump is doing in
the world,
These are people that care about these things.
The vast majority of people in the in
the American situation
don't have four zero one k's. Look it
up for yourself. Do not care or largely
even understand what the DAO is in the
world. And this is what's so frustrating is
that they report to this like this is
supposed to be what most people care about.
They do not.
Their gas prices are higher despite the numbers
fluctuating because these gas these locations are not
playing this up and down game. They know
what's going on. These prices are staying pretty
high. The reality on top of that is
that you can see food prices going up,
rent prices going up. That's been a consistent
kind of up and down, but largely upscale
situation since he's been in power.
More spending, bigger government. I just don't know
why people aren't honest about that
other than I mean, I do. I shouldn't
say it like that, but I don't know
why some that still hold on to it
don't give up on that, I should say.
Now here's one of the Iranian accounts saying,
contrary to what Trump claims, there are no
ongoing negotiations between Iran and The United States.
Now that could mean that it's an defector.
Indirect messages have reached Iran, which that's interesting,
but they do not include any proposals of
value or worth consideration.
So that could be them lying, but that
seems to suggest that they're acknowledging, yes. They
did send something,
but we don't care,
like they told you. Moreover, the channel for
sending these one-sided messages has been ongoing since
the beginning of the war, meaning nothing new
is happening. Iran will continue to the war
until it achieves its objectives, and there is
a conviction
that the five day deadline in announced by
Trump is nothing but a trick to lower
Iran's level of alertness, which is what they
do every time, with the possibility of any
strike by the adversary occurring during this period.
Every time they have some of lull,
potential ceasefire, that's when they take the opportunity
to bomb. They did the same thing in
Yemen. It's what they do. That's why I'm
that's my point. These are not honorable people.
They're devious.
Iran views a response. And, again, for those
who maybe didn't hear me say it last
time or knew, just tuned in, if you
think that it's okay because they're bad guys,
that makes you just as bad as them.
It's it's about your honor. Right? Your morals
and values and integrity, not whether you go
to their level because they're bad guy. That
makes you the same thing.
Iran views a response to the energy infrastructure
in the region and Israel's
power grid as inevitable, and Trump's timings
hold no value from its perspective. Straight up
he moves her her muse or moo excuse
me, will remain closed, they write. But, again,
remember,
it's not closed I just showed you. It's
closed to them, and that's the point.
Here is the speaker of of Iran's parliament.
Iranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of
the aggressors. All Iranian officials stand firmly behind
their supreme leader and people. Of course, he
could be lying. No negotiations
have been held with The US, and fake
news is used to manipulate the financial and
oil markets and escape the quagmire in which
The US and Israel are trapped.
That makes sense because they are, and I
think you can see this, and nobody's helping
them. At last I checked, Australia, Japan, all
of them there, even The UK.
I think the last thing I said was
looking for other viable options, but they that's
why they're they're not even talking about this
whole
guiding ships through discussion. Doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't it's illogical because of this control
over the area. Everyone knows Iran can ultimately
control that if they want to. It's a
risky situation, and you're coming at it from
a place where you do not have legal
backing. They started this. They are the aggressors.
It's very simple.
So here's what Trump had to say, and
this is the same kind of conversate. Oh,
you know what? I think oh, no. This
is a different clip. Here he is talking
about the unnamed person, and then we'll get
into what people claim as the person and
then the the final points on this.
We would stop speaking with, mister president. He
quit in Iran. A top a top person.
Don't forget.
We've wiped out the leadership phase one, phase
two, and largely phase three.
But we're dealing with the man who I
believe is the most respected and the leader.
You know, it's a little tough. They've wiped
out we've wiped out everybody. Is that the
supreme leader?
No. Not the supreme leader. We don't so
much talk. Well, nobody's ever nobody heard of
the second supreme leader, the sun. Are these
direct Nobody we have not heard from the
sun.
Wait. Did he just say
Supreme leader, the sun. Not much talk. Well,
nobody's ever nobody heard of the Yes. This
is so funny. Wait. This is just his
childish nature.
The guy obviously was heard of. The guy
was not a nobody. He's part of the
family. That was it was one of the
possibilities.
So for him just to pretend like nobody's
ever heard of him, it's just a tiny
slight. It's a juvenile jab that they probably
don't even care about. It's or to make
himself feel big in the conversation. It's just
sad. You don't need to do that.
Yeah. I mean, you could argue that it's
just his tactics. Maybe you're right. Not working.
It's actually really sad, and it makes all
look like children, but whatever.
Second supreme leader, the sun. Are these correct?
Nobody we have not heard from the sun.
Every once in a while, you'll see a
statement made, but we have not. We don't
know if he's living. But Right. Because that's
the response.
I mean, really, living because clearly you're supposed
to sing insinuate that he's dead. Is there
any evidence of that?
Not that I can see. The people that
seem to be running it, and they seem
that based on really fact because things they've
said
Oh, that was a wise that was a
very well thought out statement. Listen to that
one again. Seem to be running it, and
they seem that based on really fact. They
seem that based on really fact Because things
they've said have taken place. Cool. Very well.
Well thought out argument. Because because I said,
might as well say it like that. Mister
president again. Mister president, I don't want him
to
be
killed.
Okay. I don't want him to be Got
it. Yeah. That wasn't planned out at all.
Because I don't want him to be killed.
Did you get that? Killed.
Got the clip? Okay. Good. Right. The point
is clearly that I don't wanna tell you
who the guy is because they, Iran, will
murder him. Probably,
just like you would if there was an
an asset in the US government that was
working with Iran. You guys would treat treason.
Put them at you damn well know it.
Either way, the point is, I doesn't feel
like that's what you would say. Right? If
you're in the midst of a negotiation, you're
gonna let it be publicly known that you're
doing that, that he might be killed. I
can't say his name. So Iran then goes,
oh, which one of you?
To me, that is the most ridiculous part.
But you know what's crazy?
Knowing who Trump is, honestly, it wouldn't surprise
me. If he actually just put their deal
at risk because he wanted to bluster about
how he might get a deal, that is
exactly who he is. But still, I argue
it's more likely that he's making this up.
That's crazy to me.
Heard from The Sun.
Every once in a while, you'll see a
statement made, but we haven't we don't know
if he's living.
But the people that seem to be running
it, and they seem that based on
truly fact because things they've said have taken
place. Mister president again. Or the plausible possibility
is that Iran's playing you.
I
don't want him to be killed.
Okay? I don't want him to be killed.
It's a question you've been avoiding. Nobody wants
to be that nobody wants that job right
now. You know? Nobody's exactly looking forward to
being the head of that particular country. But
Other than the leader who's taking charge.
I'm not saying that in a positive, good,
bad, just it is the reality. He is
now in charge. He has run the and
he stepped up and did it. So that's
an incorrect statement, apparently.
Perhaps we'll be able to solve that problem.
Mister president I mean, think about the insanity
of that. Again, does I do not belabor
the point, but the state you're the argument
is you're on a secret negotiation with the
defector,
and that's why they're saying nothing's happening. And
that you're gonna publicly lay that out where
you know Iran is gonna see that? Does
that make sense to anybody? I'm telling you
that. I mean, the weirdness is that I
can see a world in which Trump would
do something that's stupid, but it's just most
logic, most likely,
just just seems like a lie.
But we will find out. And it wouldn't
I mean, one of those possibilities is that
this is literally,
you know, like they've done in the past,
and it's just just,
what's their term for? Not clocking down. You
know? But just the an intelligence operation where
you worked with somebody over the years and
convince them to turn, and then with that
influence, you're able to get what you want.
And it doesn't mean even remotely that that's
what Iranians want or that it will be
in their benefit.
Now,
this is what's being widely shared. This one's
got, like, a million what is it?
Almost 2,000,000 views. Oh, look at this.
Okay. But this isn't the same point. Now
this is correct. I did these pictures are
old, but even the guy below, he addressed
it well before this came out.
And it says the person in the picture
has denied any oh, okay. That's actually interesting.
I didn't see that. So this guy has
just added a whole lot to this story.
All these screaming people online, but still question
it. Still question it.
Oh, is that okay. That's
see, this is actually interesting. I I didn't
put that's funny. I was reading those other
statements, and I had put together that that
was the same guy. The point here
first is that this guy already did this,
but he did follow-up
hours later when everybody called him out. Is
this it says this
air Iranian air for Air Force flight was
reported on, landed, and carried the delegation of
Islam. Basically, Israel then allowed it to fly
out is the point. Right? So, oh my
god, they allowed it to go out there
make their meetings and discuss this.
And he said that that hours later, he
posted this. Those pictures I posted were archives,
and it's just not that it's those images
weren't the point. It's that it's happening, and
I use the images to make the case.
Okay. That does happen. But it was, you
know, like, four hours later he posted that.
But now even Twitter is saying, because he's
the post, he says
no negotiations with America have taken place. That's
him. So that's the guy that they're claiming
was on the way. To me,
that is pretty damn clear. But let's keep
going.
I'll include this for you, which other one
was already in there, actually, the the other
version.
So same Adam,
Adam Cochran points out that these are the
old images. That is correct.
And then somebody goes, no. And people believe
that they were basically saying, no. It's old,
but it's a real thing. But as we
now see, he said that's not the truth.
But even still, like, hypothetically speaking, it could
be that they got the person wrong and
there is an agreement. You don't question everything.
Right? But you know where I lean. I'm
leaning towards exactly that this is a manufactured
thing to drive Iran to a place of
weakness in order to take advantage because they're
losing. Israel and The United States are losing
this agenda is what the facts seem to
suggest to me. DropSight News comes out today
and says a senior Iranian official tells DropSight
News, tells Jeremy Scahill,
quote, there aren't any negotiations taking place. The
Iranian side has simply communicated its conditions to
The United States.
Take a listen.
And then we'll end with a couple of
important points I think about. Really, the re
the main thing I want that I'm concerned
about is that be in this situation because
what I believe is the reality that they're
ultimately weak is that this will be something
driven
by Israel in order to get Trump to
feel that he has no other choice or
that it's ultimately the right choice.
I'm worried about where that goes. Before we
get there, here's what Jeremy had to say.
Debated how to even deal with this, and
they they literally ghosted Steve Witkoff. They did
not respond to him. When we reported that
last week, the White House went nuts. They
denounced,
drop site news, accusing us of engaging in
They did too. Actually, I have reported on
that, but they did. They literally called them
out by name and called them, like, propaganda
or something.
America last behavior,
said we were abhorrent, and then they went
and they spun a story to Axios saying
that it was actually the Iranians that had
been begging president Trump to speak. And and
so, you know, this this kind of played
out over the the past few days. And
And that's my point in general. This that's
what he if you were in this for
the agenda alone,
you wouldn't respond to that.
You just let it carry. Like, you know,
there's no point. But Trump is seems to
be so small and narcissistic
that he can't let that go. So he
has to force a story out that says
they're begging me for a deal when when
ultimately all it does is hurt the agenda.
By the way, good. The agenda that I
don't think we, anybody, should want, but realize
that it's them like, that's that's what it's
like dealing with somebody like Trump in the
situation, that his narcissism and hubris
often supersedes the actual agenda.
Maybe even he wants to. I don't know.
But that's my opinion. But that's what we
have and we have seen I've seen this
countless times
because it's not true. Right? They weren't begging
it. They made it clear relentlessly.
Doesn't mean they were working with somebody.
But he had to push that out. And
I think that's what shows this starting point.
What Iranian sources were telling me, Daniel, is
that through a series of, intermediary
countries, including Turkey,
Pakistan,
Egypt,
and also some Gulf countries, there have been
a series of messages passed on to the
Iranians by The United States where according to
Iranian officials,
these third party intermediaries have said that The
US wants to wrap up this war.
And that happens while publicly Trump is saying,
we're gonna bomb Iran's electrical and power infrastructure,
which, by the way, would be a war
crime, if they did that in a in
a sweeping manner. Iran then said, hey. Let
us tell you what we can do. We
can hit not only in Israel,
but we can hit in,
all throughout The Gulf. And this this would
cause just, like, catastrophic
shock to the global economy,
we, you know, which we we can talk
about later. But the the most breaking stuff
I have for you
is that Trump today,
posts on truth social that there's been this
breakthrough,
that he's pausing his threat to,
to bomb the Iranian electrical grid and other
energy infrastructure
because there have been these talks going on
between The United States and Iran.
And Trump implies that he has some
secret squirrel that he's talking to, in Iran,
and he doesn't wanna name who it is,
because he doesn't want that person to be
killed. It's unclear. Does he mean by Israel
or by or by the Iranians? You know?
But, what I'm told is that there have
been no negotiations,
direct negotiations with The United States, and that
what the Iranian officials are telling me is
that every time a third country comes to
Iran and they say The United States wants
to talk, Iran says, let us explain to
you our conditions. And and in short, what
the Iranians are saying
is that they will not agree
to the kind of ceasefire that took place
last June after the so called twelve day
war because the Iranians view that as having
been a gimmick to buy The United States
and Israel time to rearm, to reposition,
and then come back in with this full
blown war that they launched on February 28.
So they're saying they won't go for just
a ceasefire
that doesn't have conditions attached to it. They
also want any,
cessation of the war, not only to apply
to Iran, but to apply to two other
fronts of battle as the Iranians see it,
Iraq as well as Lebanon, where the Israelis
are increasingly engaged in ground operations,
very heavy bombing.
Hezbollah, which Israel had said was wiped out,
has been launching dozens upon dozens of rockets
every single day into Israel. So they want
those two, countries also to be party to
this ceasefire deal. They're also saying that they
want,
reparations paid by The United States, and they
want Israel to pay, but they don't want
Israel to pay directly. They want that to
happen, through The United States because they don't
wanna take anything directly from,
Israel. But the the the other thing, and
this is, you know, I think very relevant.
It's and and many people I know you've
made this point before, and I've heard other
smart analysts make it, that because of the
way The United States and Israel have lied
about the negotiations,
have used it as a veneer or a
cover to then wage these wars,
the Iranian position has hardened.
And what Iran is saying now is that
there will be no discussion on its ballistic
missile program. That if there is a ceasefire,
Iran is gonna move rapidly
to continue
its ballistic missile program, recognizing it that it's
its only deterrent,
against The United States and against
Israel. They're also saying, and they wouldn't go
into more detail on this,
that they're going to that they're in the
process of developing a new doctrine on the
nuclear question. They didn't say, oh, we're gonna
go and and we want to enrich uranium
to make nuclear weapons.
But what they're saying to me is that,
that that because of, The US and Israel
targeting their nuclear infrastructure, because they blew up
the negotiations where the Iranians had put,
terms on the table that went beyond the
Obama era deal. They're saying now that they're
having discussions about developing a new nuclear doctrine
potentially in partnership with with Russia and China.
Well
yeah. And and what that guy is gonna
get into, doesn't that do that's not good.
Ron Nukes. Oh my god. Here we go.
Like, that like, that's it's
question it as well, by the way, whether
Jeremy or anybody else question it. He could
be lying, misinformed.
But the point is it's legal for every
other country in the world, including Iran. The
idea that they're not allowed to do that
is just arbitrarily stupid. It doesn't apply to
anybody else. They it applied arbitrarily
to North Korea until they reach that point,
and then they never talked about it again.
And the the lesson from Libya, North Korea
is obvious.
Nonetheless, they've continued to point out that it's
a FAK1 and it's something they won't do,
and the evidence has always backed that up.
And yet, they've lied the entire time. In
fact, all their actions have shown that they
don't have it. They wouldn't be doing this
if they knew they had those nukes. They've
lied. But the point is they've driven them
to a place to where maybe
they're rationalizing why they might need to do
it anyway, which would make sense to everybody
who also would not be a crime regardless
of what Israel says, including Israel having nukes,
by the way. But I still argue the
point is I I would have questioned whether
that is actually what they're gonna do. One,
because it is, in fact, a religious issue
for them. But secondarily, that it ultimately would
give them the very thing they need to
justify, see, we always told you. Despite how
we've been saying it for twenty years, we
told you and here it is. So it
just seems like a bad choice right now.
But it very well may not be the
case. But just understand that regardless.
It's not a crime, guys. And it's only
an issue because Israel decides to make it
an issue for them, despite them being the
ones that seem to use their power unjustly
every single day of our lives,
including being the first ones to actually use
nuclear weapons
on groups that were already retreating, which in
case you don't already know that, look it
up. It's very provable. They were already winning.
The Japan was already retreating. They used those
nukes anyway. Because, one, the argument is they
wanted to see what happened, and, two, they
wanted to make sure Russia saw it.
That is who we've always dealt with since.
Now, this is Grok, in case you wanna
see what Grok has to say. Have The
US or Israeli military carried out any bombings
today? Right. Okay. So let's get into a
second part of this. Like I said earlier,
so Trump says we're five day ceasefire. Right?
That's what he just said. Apparently, three days
we've been talking about this. Frankly, I think
he's making it up.
But he said ceasefire.
So
what happened? Here we are. This is it.
He said that earlier today. Right?
Israel attacks just today. Wide scale strikes on
infrastructure in Tehran.
In the capital, you know, more packed than
New York City because that's okay. Strikes in
other Iranian locations.
This is just Israel, by the way. Continued
operations in Lebanon
targeting homes as Israel told you they were
going to. Additional reports of strikes in Gaza
because that's still happening as well.
Just, you know, despite what Trump said. Okay.
Military actions from the US government. So Trump
says, pause on military action.
And then they continue bombing Iran because that's
what happened today. And you can easily prove
that. Reports of heavy US Israel joint airstrikes.
Okay. Just to make it even more clear,
specifically, were there any of these attacks that
were carried out after Trump announced a hold
on all attacks due to these alleged talks?
Of course, it's real. Still to this very
moment, by the way, bombing relentlessly
Tehran, Lebanon. And even if they stop bombing
in Tehran
and kept bombing in Lebanon, which will probably
happen if they stretch this out, what does
that show you? Aren't we being told that
that's because it's Iran? Well, then that would
apply to the ceasefire, would it not? No,
and it won't because they don't see it
the same. It's not Iran. It's because they
want Lebanon, just like they want Iran, they
want Syria, they want Iraq because of greater
Israel and because of ethnic cleansing. And that's
what they do. But recognize when, if, and
when that happens. But nonetheless, right now, still
bombing in Tehran
after Trump said we were pausing,
which shows you Israel's the one leading the
war.
These occur after Trump's announcement, ad confirmed by
reports of ongoing or new waves on Monday.
Israel'scom
completing strikes in Tehran evening local time, well
after Trump said stopped, well after they should
have known that, which aligns with US evening
and afternoon. The point,
watch as they keep bombing tomorrow.
You think I mean, I'm completely guessing.
Only thing I'm using is what Israel has
always done my entire life. Now watch
as they keep bombing into tomorrow.
I mean, that will only show you they
kept no concern for what Trump is doing
and claiming it's their joint war, yet they're
gonna do whatever they want. And Trump will
probably not do anything about it, which shows
you Israel is completely in control.
Also, continuing into Lebanon, which won't stop regardless.
It should. Now, this is the crazy part
to me.
So they did ultimately stop any
only US strikes. Right? And this shows it
even more clear. Guess what they didn't stop.
Even though Trump, who's commander in chief of
the military, said no more.
Joint
US Israeli strikes
did continue
all across Iran
as part of a broader campaign.
It's you can look it up for yourself.
Look at the timing. So what does that
show you? That means there's some US military
personnel who are working at the at the
orders of something other than Trump. That's how
I would read that. Or at the very
least, he's lied to all of us, and
they were bombing anyway.
That has to that that really has to
register with people, guys.
Your Trump is not in control at all,
and somebody else is making the top the
the calling the shots, or he's lying to
you, or they're somewhere in between because they're
still bombing.
Now as Afarazani points out, Trump is signaling
a total
resolution of hostilities.
Like, that's the same post. Right? But Israel
wants the war to continue.
Clearly, they're still bombing.
Will Israel escalate and bomb Iran's critical infrastructure
to spoil the peace? And worse yet, will
they do so and blame it on Iran
in other locations?
Right? Will they bomb Qatar and say Iran's
still bombing and cause it to spin out
even further? Probably.
If Israel's left to fight Iran alone, which
they won't do, Iran could continue hammering Israel,
and the possibility of Israel using nuclear weapons
remains.
Now this was,
the similar discussion with the guy we pointed
out earlier, but but it simply says, if
The US withdraws from a war in Iran,
Israel may use nuclear weapons. The US government,
especially under Republicans, is so tethered to the
Israeli agenda, we can't pull out even if
we wanted to. That's what they said. Because
let's just say Trump wakes up tomorrow and
he
pulls out.
I'm done. I'm out. Everything he ever wanted.
The problem is that might actually put the
Israelis into the position to use nukes. Now
this is the argument being used by some
of the more extremist Republicans out there to
argue that's why Trump has to stay in
here. Glenn Beck in the red. The Trump
saw this plan, and he knew we had
to stop them at the end. It's just
gross, and it's disgustingly
wrong because of everything you've already seen. But
even if it was the case, it still
means that he's lied to you every other
way to get here.
Like, that's that's literally trust the plan. Lied
every which way, but it's okay because he's
just saving you from Israel.
Even though he's panders to them every single
way he can.
I don't think I think the reality is
that clearly they're under control
or part of the plan.
Now as this is happening,
you have
Israelis on Israeli media basically trying to make
the argument for using those nukes.
And it's the former Israeli intelligence officer openly
calling for nuking Iran in a broadcast.
Not new, by the way.
And James Lee points out a potential false
flag point, and this is in regard to
the Diego Garcia base. Now before we play
this, let's not forget that that's a military
base. It's not an escalation at all. It's
a literal response to their illegal bombings. That
became an open military target when they initiated
this illegal war because that's partly US base.
So when they report every action Iran's taking,
like they're breathlessly clutching their pearls going, no.
They just committed terrorism by bombing a base
or a bombing. It's they started the war
illegally, and Iran is responding. And every single
time they have the opportunity to stop and
they keep doubling down because that's all they
know how to do,
this appears to be something with the midst
in the midst of what's happening, it could
very well be Israel trying to make sure
this doesn't stop.
A few days ago, we were told that
two ICBMs were fired at Diego Garcia, which
is a joint US UK military base in
the Southern Indian Ocean. Now the Israeli military
very quickly claimed that Iran
fired these missiles and that they could soon
hit Europe, including cities like Berlin, Paris, and
Rome. Prime Which I don't know why that
claim continues to scare people. You realize how
many other countries in the world have missiles
that are all adversarial or Muslim or whatever
else you wanna think you should worry about?
Including Iran, by the way. Despite I mean,
argument being that there's a low max. But
I I look. I think most of these
countries have the ability to go farther than
we probably think.
It's it's all that's I mean, why would
it be a worry that they might be
able to, but we don't worry that the
US government could bomb all over the world?
Why is that not an issue? Is it
only bad when brown people do it or
because they tell you they're terrorists even though
your government conducts terrorism every single day of
your life? It's all perspective.
Minister Netanyahu then tweeted out, quote, I asked
the leaders of the free world, what are
you waiting for? Israel is not only fighting
for itself, but fighting for all of you.
Oh, is it now? Or do you mean
US personnel
as Israel continues attacking Lebanon? Let's they were
already attacking Lebanon. I'm pretty sure right now
Netanyahu is trying to make it appear as
if he's doing Lebanon and Trump's doing Iran
and we're both fighting Iran. They were already
occupying and invading Lebanon. They were already bombing
them. They were already making settlements with the
Hebrew names in the beginning of post October
7. So right now, effectively, you have US
personnel and Donald Trump fighting Iran and Netanyahu
letting it take place. So let's not pretend
like he's we're fighting it for you. He's
just trying to get the world to go
against Iran. But there's just one problem. Iran
says they got nothing to do with it.
And if you read The Wall Street Journal
reporting critically, it said that one of the
missiles failed mid flight, so it didn't even
get there. And the other may or may
not have been intercepted.
So we really have no idea what actually
happened. The US's own intelligence indicate that Iran
lacks the capability
of firing any missiles outside of about 1,200
miles. Now Diego Garcia is located in the
Southern Indian Ocean about 2,500 miles away from
the nearest point in Iran, so something is
not adding up here. Okay. The UK has
now publicly come out to say that there
is, quote, no assessment to substantiate Israel's claim
that Iran has long range missiles capable of
hitting London. The NATO We just keep spinning
the lies. Right? Whatever gets people to feel
like there's a problem. The secretary general said
they have no evidence that Iran fired missiles
at Diego Garcia. So if that's Now, again,
though, remember my point, though. It's not it's
certain says it's possible they have that ability,
but it's not about the ability to do
so. It's about whether or not they would.
In this case, yes. I believe they would
because it's a military base. But the point
he's making is the evidence doesn't back that
up. So this is my point in general.
It's not about whether, you know,
it's about the idea of creating the illusion
that one, right now, they're bombing through what
he claims is a five day thing that
maybe they didn't even agree to, but also
just Israel trying to use these these pressure
points to drive or maybe manipulate Trump into
taking another step.
Really the case that Iran didn't fire those
missiles than the elephant in the room, of
course, is
who did. And, of course, he's pointing to
The US' liberty picture in the background. You
know what he means. It's clearly wondering whether
the Israeli government is creating this with yet
another false flag.
Trump's former counter terror chief, Joe Kent,
says president needs to focus on restraining the
Israelis.
Otherwise, the war escalates. Sure
seems like everybody understands what's going on, including
his own intelligence community who told him not
to do this, and he does it anyway.
I don't know how much more clear that
can get.
John King says, now we know the deadliest
missile to hit the country of Iran
definitely came from The United States. Showed you
this earlier. Now I'm just continuing to show
you that maybe maybe this wasn't.
Like, maybe this was Israel carrying this out
to create this overlap. Like, wonder this. Or
maybe The US was bombing it to blame
it on Iran. Like, this is the world
that we are in.
In fact, that sounds very much like that
Patrick Kossen clip. Maybe I'll finish with that
today. We are in the game of covert
means against the Iranians. We could get we
could ask you with that, that's what he
says, and very much exactly what we're dealing
with today. Now, lastly,
let's be real about the the at least
the sentiment that came from his administration
while trying to claim peace is where he's
going. They're very clearly making preparations for an
invasion, which I argue they already have some
level of boots. But this is about the
official deployment, which regardless of the claims were
always in the cards.
That's important to hear.
Now as you saw, probably, over the last
few days, Hegseth saying we're extending the department's
reinstatement
and return service to the people that they
forced out because of COVID shots, which, by
the way, happened just as much in Trump's
administration as Biden's.
Robert Barnes says, oops, we're sorry about the
vaccine mandate. Will you please come back now
and die for Israel instead? You gotta love
how many Republicans who were very much supporting
of Trump being put in power, who, by
the way, a lot of them called us
black pill and didn't, you know, tried to
shout our voices down, and we tried to
warn about exactly what we're dealing with now.
I'd like to believe some of them who,
if they are honest, would point that out
and say, look, those guys right back then,
either way, a lot of them have started
to call this out at a high level.
I mean, you could point to the own
countess Owens and Tuckers and Jake Smith, and
there's plenty of them. And yet still,
the the cartoonish people in the nation of
alternative media,
you know, it's just fun. I I'm starting
to wonder if it's like they wait. Like,
think about in the circle of the major
conservative conversation.
I sort of think they look at those
people and laugh at them. And it's only
about presenting that to people other than their
it's just that we're being gaslit everywhere.
My opinion, anyway. Well, Trump was also
discussing and was already just and that there
was even floated ideas that they might have
already put boots on the ground on this
island, and that it had always been his
plan. And he's talking about taking over the
island, of course, to open the Strait. No.
It's about the oil. It's about everything else
we're talking about. We already talked about him
discussing whether he had to go in to
get the uranium. Even though the uranium was
what they said they would give up, it
had you make taken the deal instead of
bombing them. But now we have to go
in to seize it. It's all manufactured kind
of stuff, but it's all about boots on
the ground.
Then state department, the US state department, under
Trump, warns Americans aft around the world.
Yeah. That escalated quickly, didn't it? A quick
limited strikes to decapitate the leader, and here
we are with them warning the world. Everyone
in the world, Americans, everywhere you go, watch
your back.
Yeah. Hashtag winning. Right? Peace president.
That sound like that works out?
Well, interestingly, let's just say for thick of
conversation that maybe this is gonna end with
a cease fire because Trump made a deal.
Well, guess what? They have they'll ask him
a little question. Like, what about what happens
if we do end the war? Right? What
happens if what about happens to that $200,000,000,000?
So for president ending, do you still need
$200,000,000,000?
We,
it's always nice to have.
It's always nice to have. It's a very
inflamed world, and the Democrats inflame it. You
know, largely, the Democrats inflame it. Let me
just talk about the other Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Right? Democrats suck anyway.
Great. So, basically, it's an inflating world. You
know, war is gonna happen. War is gonna
war, guys. We gotta have that $200,000,000,000
for the other war that won't happen. Hashtag
freedom.
We can't be this stupid.
200 bit it was never even about this
is just this is the control grid. That's
money for the thing they're building around you.
The point, though, is that even though the
war might be out, yeah, but you could
take that as it's not gonna end, which
is kind of the likely reality I think
is coming. But even if it does, yeah,
we need it anyway.
Guys, if you are a special kind of
willfully ignorant if you are not calling this
out, you either never cared about everything he
said he was gonna do, which is a
lot of them and they just wanna be
a part of the team, or you somehow
can't see that none of it's happening. In
fact, the opposite's happening.
Time to wake up and face reality, guys.
He's robbing you blind while telling you he's
selling you everything you need
when I can't see anything but taking happening
right here.
Lastly, Decent of News
has a great clip here. Make sure you
stay tuned. It's nonstop reality of how they're
basically just parroting
the Iraq war lies.
Never stops.
Thank you for tuning in.
Actually, I I briefly said this then didn't
even say the point in the middle of
the show. I'm better at the end anyway.
You might have thought what I was gonna
say if you remember what I'm talking about.
Point was, in the beginning, I actually wanted
to say this, but, we have a jam
packed week. As you for those of you
know that I'm trying to get this on
more of a routine kinda path, my goal
is is the week. Not always to take
two days off. I doubt I'll let do
that all the time. It's more about family
stuff right now. But my plan is, right
now, Monday to Friday. And it won't always
be Monday to Friday. It might float, but
five shows is my plan. And And sometimes
that may be an interview, like, with Robert
or a cohost on daily wrap up, but
my goal is to just keep this going
through the week because it's better it's easier
for us to to maintain a flow of
information.
So that being said, I'll see you tomorrow.
And have a lot of stuff that I
ultimately had touched on, like, for example, the
Pete Hegseth kind of propaganda point. I wanna
get to that at some point. Maybe the
the Muslim discussion that's coming up back in
this country. And, of course, whatever happens in
the next twenty four hours. And other information
we're gonna probably include or maybe touching on
some older stories. For example, Jason Vassler made
a great point the other day, the anniversary
of of the, you know, three years since
East Palestine.
And as he said, no. It didn't go
away. It just fell out of the new
cycle. People are still suffering. They've never really
gotten much. I mean, they're they're black,
Norfolk Southern, as I've constantly shown you, has
benefited from the outcome there. So too does
everybody else involved with these kind of operations.
The point is there's a lot that we
could get into.
There's good reporting going on right now showing
you new studies
that are showing you what we already have
proven, but it's still important to see that
these shots are killing people and giving myocarditis.
But plenty to talk about.
So, I'll see you tomorrow.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question everything. Come to your
own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Fellow citizens,
at this hour,
American and coalition forces are in the early
stages of military operations
to disarm Iraq, to free its people, and
to defend the world from grave danger. A
short time ago,
the United States military began
major combat
operations
in Iran.
It states
Oh, shoot. I'm sorry, guys.
I was saying something and I forgot to
put my video in there. That was me.
It didn't freeze. I apologize.
So all I said, I'm gonna start this
over. So there's that was like a thirty
second gap in there. My apologies.
I just did
and didn't have the video up. Now the
point, Della, I was saying very quickly, I'll
try to do as quick as possible, is
I had a thought about this in regard
to Donald Trump. Remember the the point about
whether that video was AI? Remember that? Now
really quickly, the point was that we have
seen since then that there were videos they
put out that were arguably prerecorded,
that they ultimately had something set and were
waiting to release it. That's what I think
this might have been. There was an overlap
to maybe and maybe something was altered within
it because I think the program I used
did say that there was something off about,
like, was altered in some way, but that
could have just been touching up corners of
the video as I like I talked about.
But I think what we're talking about now
that we learned more of the timeline is
that they plan to do this. And they
were in the midst of negotiations of peace,
and he had already recorded the video just
waiting for the moment of when they executed
the plan. That's my thought on that. I
I'm probably never gonna bring it up again
because I just it's not gonna become relevant
as we go forward unless that story comes
back around. So I I wanted to throw
it in there because I thought that was
interesting. It just really speaks to the four
the the planning, the foreknowledge, the lack of
honor and and, you know,
willing to
feign negotiations
of peace and then murder people while they're
doing it
over and over and over and plan it
out as they did.
Okay. I'll leave it there, guys. Thank you
for tuning in. Sorry for the gap. See
you next time.
In the early stages of military operations
to disarm Iraq, to free its people, and
to defend the world from grave danger. A
short time ago,
the United States military began
major combat
operations
in Iran. The threat comes from Iraq.
It arises directly from the Iraqi regime's own
actions,
its history of aggression,
and its drive
toward an arsenal of terror. Its menacing activities
directly endanger The United States, our troops, our
bases overseas,
and our allies throughout the world. This terrorist
regime can never have a nuclear weapon. Saddam
Hussein
is a homicidal dictator
who is addicted to weapons of mass destruction.
Our objective is to defend the American people
by eliminating
imminent threats from the Iranian
regime,
a vicious
group of very hard,
terrible people. There can be
no peace if our security depends on the
will and whims of a ruthless and aggressive
dictator. And they are indeed sick and sinister.
The Iraqi regime was required to destroy its
weapons of mass destruction,
to cease all development of such weapons,
and to stop all support for terrorist groups.
The Iraqi regime has violated
all of those obligations.
Following our
obliteration of Iran's nuclear program, we warned Iran
not to make any attempt to rebuild at
a different location, but they ignored those warnings
and refused to cease their pursuit of nuclear
weapons. The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting
its nuclear weapons program. We warned them never
to resume their malicious pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities
at sites that have been part of this
nuclear program in the past. We sought
repeatedly
to make a deal.
We tried.
They wanted to do it. They didn't wanna
do it. Again, they wanted to do it.
They didn't wanna do it. They didn't know
what was happening. They just wanted to practice
evil. The entire world has witnessed Iraq's eleven
year history of defiance,
deception,
and bad faith. For decades and decades,
they rejected every opportunity to renounce their nuclear
ambitions,
and we can't take it anymore.
Some believe we can address this danger by
simply resuming the old approach to inspections
and applying diplomatic and economic pressure.
Yet this is precisely what the world has
tried to do since 1991.
For forty seven years, the Iranian regime has
chanted death to America and waged
an unending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder
targeting The United States, our troops, and the
innocent people in many, many countries.
Iraq possesses ballistic missiles
with a likely range of hundreds of miles
far enough to strike Saudi Arabia,
Israel,
Turkey,
and other nations. The regime's conventional ballistic missile
program was growing rapidly and dramatically,
and this posed a very clear, colossal threat
to America and our forces stationed overseas.
In the last year alone, the Iraqi military
has fired upon American and British pilots
more than 750
times. The regime already had missiles capable of
hitting Europe
and our bases both local and overseas and
would soon have had missiles capable of reaching
our beautiful America. Regime change in Iraq is
the only certain means of removing a great
a great danger to our nation. The dictator
of Iraq is a student of Stalin,
using murder as a tool of terror and
control. The regime has armed, trained, and funded
terrorist militias that have
soaked the earth with blood and guts. Saddam
Hussein is harboring terrorists and the instruments of
terror. We're ensuring that the world's number one
sponsor
of terror
can never obtain a nuclear weapon. In addition
to declaring and destroying all of its weapons
of mass destruction,
Iraq must end its support for terrorism. We're
ensuring that the Iranian
regime cannot continue to arm, fund, and direct
terrorist
armies outside of their borders. It has given
shelter and support to terrorism
and practices terror
against its own people. Iran is the world's
number one state sponsor of terror
and just recently killed tens of thousands of
its own citizens on the street as they
protested. We've experienced the horror of September 11.
And it was Iran's proxy, Hamas,
that launched the monstrous October 7 attacks on
Israel. We have seen that those who hate
America are willing to crash airplanes
in the buildings full of innocent people. Sluttering
more than 1,000 innocent people, including 46 Americans,
while taking 12 of our citizens
hostage. It was brutal.
Something like the world has never seen before.
The attacks of September 11 showed our country
that vast oceans no longer protect us from
danger.
Before that tragic date,
we had only hints of Al Qaeda's plans
and designs.
Today in Iraq,
we see a threat whose outlines are far
more clearly defined
and whose consequences
could be far more deadly. An Iranian regime
armed with long range missiles and nuclear weapons
would be an intolerable threat
to the Middle East, but also to
the American people.
The Iraqi dictator
must not be permitted to threaten America and
the world
with horrible poisons
and diseases
and gases
and atomic weapons. I'll say it again. They
can never have a nuclear weapon. If we
know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today,
and we do,
does it make any sense for the world
to wait to confront him as he grows
even stronger
and develops even more dangerous weapons? This was
our last best chance to strike what we're
doing right now and eliminate the intolerable
threats posed by this
sick and sinister regime regime. Now as before,
we will secure our nation,
protect our freedom,
and help others to find freedom of their
own. To the great proud people of Iran,
I say tonight that the hour of your
freedom is at hand. The lives of Iraqi
citizens would improve dramatically if Saddam Hussein were
no longer in power. When we are finished,
take over your government. It will be yours
to take.
This will be probably
your only chance for generations.
America
is a friend
to the people of Iraq. America is backing
you with overwhelming
strength and devastating force. America believes that all
people
are entitled to hope
and human rights.
People everywhere prefer freedom to slavery,
prosperity to squalor,
self government
to the rule of terror and torture. Now
is the time to seize control of your
destiny and to unleash
the prosperous and glorious future
that is close within your reach. Our demands
are directed only at the regime that enslaves
them. When these demands are met,
the first and greatest benefit will come to
Iraqi men,
women, and children.
This is the moment for action. Do not
let it pass.