'21 to 2021.
And it asked what were the consequences of
those sanctions, and we murdered 38,000,000
people.
38,000,000
people.
The amount of havoc we have brought on
The Middle East in recent years
is just stunning.
If you think about the consequences of the
Iraq war,
what we do in places like Venezuela, Cuba,
Iran, you understand we're using this tremendous
economic leverage we have to basically starve people,
to make them suffer, to inflict
great punishment on them so that they'll rise
up against their government. You understand that this
is what we're doing in Venezuela. This is
what we're doing
in Iran.
We're inflicting
massive punishment on these people.
Given all that,
I find it very difficult to talk about
The United States as a noble country.
I just don't.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thanks. Thank you for joining me today.
Definitely important follow-up from yesterday, and I'm glad
we got a show today because there's so
much that I didn't get to include yesterday
because of a full
time discussion issue.
Why we still have time daylight savings time,
I don't know. Understand. We talk about this
plenty of times in the past, but it
screwed me up a bit yesterday. And so
there was a lot that I didn't get
to that I wanna make sure we include.
And essentially, just picking up from where I
left off. But there's some port the I
think three or four things that I wanna
include to start that actually added to the
things we discussed in the beginning part of
the show yesterday.
And, in addition to that, there's some really
interesting developments that we're gonna tie into what
I was already gonna discuss, which in a
way, it might have made it better to
discuss yesterday or not. You know, it's hard
as hell when, you know, if it's better
to have kind of a follow-up conversation
or to have it all in one place.
So sometimes I feel like we get too
far ahead of a story and then it
kind of loses people as it ends up
being, you know, grabbed onto by some of
the more surface level conversation. But the point
is today that we were just discussing
we were going to get into yesterday discussion
of reports
about,
you know, homeland security risks that Trump's administration
was sort of, like, trying to bury, which
felt very weird to me. And I'll get
into it. I don't wanna get into it
now. We'll get into it when we get
there, but some weirdness around, like, oh, why
I think that doesn't really make sense or,
you know, whichever way it goes. But now
with reports
coming about threats because of the Iran war,
some kind of source signal that the US
government got about inside threats, which these are
all real things. Like, it would it's just
because we know what our government is and
how often they lie and fake these things,
it it doesn't mean that Iran's not capable
of that. But the point is that now
suddenly and, well, I shouldn't say suddenly. There's
it's kind of a there's been an event,
oh, from yesterday to today
revolving around Maqdani in New York and IEDs
and and calling it a ISIS inspired attack.
The the people's names are Ibrahim and Amir,
you know, typical Islamic names. And they're they're
out there
carrying out, yeah, like, protests and ultimately
counter protests and then responses with bombs from
the groups that are protesting against the people
calling them terrorists in front of a person
who is supporting their agenda, at least on
the surface. All of it seems very fishy
to me, but we're gonna go through it
with objective eyes and consider that that very
well could be what happened because of what
our government's doing in the world today and
people irrationally acting out, not supporting actions like
that. But people act crazy when governments do
crazy things. That's how history has it's riddled
with realities like that. Now the point, though,
is that they tend to create those things
to use them for their later agendas. And
so what we're gonna talk about today is
a lot of that sort of manufacturing consent,
problem reaction solution,
the false flag potential. I mean, this is
every single war I've ever seen, our government's
responsible for things like this. And so too,
I argue, are all the rest. I think
this is just common practice today as much
as that may seem crazy to some that
don't understand the history.
But as I said, we're gonna and and
the the,
John, Marshheimer there talking about the obvious reality
of the war of terror on terror.
We talked about this yesterday, and I'm just
glad I saw this clip because it's, it's
just so nice to see somebody who's just
he's so the way he discusses this, if
you didn't haven't heard it before, you'd be
like, he's he's talking about this like it's
just common knowledge. Well, guess what? It is,
guys.
It's very easy to see this stuff, and
it's historically accurate. There's tons of scientific studies,
but the mainstream alternative and mainstream media just
don't they pretend like that's not real. It's
sort of like Trump and the rest of
them still screaming that that was an Iran
bomb that that hit that school despite all
the evidence, US and otherwise.
Everything we could see, and they just yell
the opposite, and some people just go along
with that. The reality is, as he he
said I said tens of millions yesterday. He
said 38,000,000 people
from 71 to twenty one two thousand.
And, you know, I the war on terror
is a major bulk of that, but the
reality is it's been going on for quite
a long time. And as he said very
clearly, the use of these tactics
to manipulate people how long have I been
telling you this? To turn against their own
governments. That's what sanctions are. That it's I
mean, it can be rather, and now they
usually are applied by this admin this government.
Clearly using them as coercive tools to put
people in positions of insecurity so they react
against their own governments. And, usually, even knowing
that that's being done to them by the
United States or outside powers, they get to
a point where they're so desperate. Their children
are starving. They don't know what to do.
People are dying in front of them to
where they go, you know what? Just make
it stop. We we we wanna get back
to some semblance of life. We don't care
if you rule over us with some kind
of, you know, authoritarian dictatorship. We just want
our my children to not die. And this
is the kind of things that have been
written down, discussed
openly by people like Kissinger.
I mean, you could go through our entire
history. It's just very important to understand why
that is something that the rest of the
world seems to know and our government tries
to hide from, and what they're doing right
now is an extension of that very point.
But we're gonna get into a Epstein point
to start just very quickly that I didn't
want you to miss because of how much
is going on, and I think it was
the effort was to make it something they
didn't get seen. I wanna add to something
we discussed yesterday about sort of the, you
know, resetting the world, but just really on
a foreign policy point and all the different
countries they're involved in and stealing from right
now.
And an article for The Washington Post
that is discussing what we were already highlighting
before, and this was this is not news
because of the Washington Post. I'm surprised the
Washington Post is even pointing to it. It's
it's it's really interestingly news because Rubio, I
guess, either accidentally or for whatever reason by
design, said it out loud first, which is
that Israel
basically coerced them into bombing Iran. Now I'm
not not of the mind that they're even
that difficult to coerce, but it was about
trying to map this out so they didn't
lose their support.
And so what happened is it seems, as
Rubio said, that we they were gonna bomb,
and so we had to bomb because we
knew they were gonna bomb next. And then
everyone else sort of tried to walk away
from that, and Trump lied about it and
said, no. It was our decision. And now
it's coming out through Israel
media and Israeli contacts and and the Washington
Post covering what they already said, that this
seems to be the larger reality, which I
think we already know. That, ultimately,
this is something that is it there this
is one of the points we're gonna discuss
showing that Israel is
controlling this war, which I don't think is
even that hard to sell for people today.
It's quite obvious, in fact. And another example
of Trump now admitting that and I we
just showed you the recent one where Israel
came and said, like and this was through,
Barack Reid, I believe. Said, why are you
talking to Iran without us? And Trump said,
we won't do it again. I mean, I'm
kind of making it sound worse, but that's
really what happened. Ultimately, he said, okay. Fine.
We will not engage without you. And now
it's coming out even more today that Israel
is ultimately the one deciding these decision or
the deciding the factors that go into these
or the the deciding what action to take
and the outcomes.
And so I think what's important to see
is that this has always been the reality,
and I really hope people can see that.
I I shouldn't say it so hyperbolically. I
mean, in the sense of the conversation we're
having and how long we've been discussing it,
it's been there. It's been in front of
us.
Now we're also gonna get into the points
we told you yesterday, and I wanna make
an important point about the two party illusion
propaganda
and people who are now trying to grapple
with this discussion that is that obvious. Now
I'm gonna leave the rest of it up.
We are I mean, basically, what we discussed
yesterday, what we didn't get to. Anthropic, the
conversation of the
bombing, using anthropic, and how this is important
for the bigger picture, Palantir,
lavender,
habsura, what's going on in Gaza, how it's
now being applied in, I mean, the world,
the global conversation.
And the just summing it up, the many
different parts of the Iran conversation that we're
gonna get into. The bombings that I've seen,
the civilian targets, the the the new appointed
leader in Iran, the conversations from the US
government and Israel, and how all of it
really does paint a very clear picture of
who is dictating this war.
So this is the post here. Thank you
to Sarah for sharing that.
I think it's very important that we understand
the history and what the world does know
about what our government has done. And interestingly,
don't miss the point that I believe
and and I I'm shouldn't even say I
believe there's many examples of them stating this
out loud, but who knows if it's the
majority? I tend to think so that peoples
of these countries and their governments even make
it clear. We're not talking about you Americans.
We're talking about the government.
I think it's important to hear. I think
that is easy to see.
Now one thing to include that I just
saw before I went live that's really doesn't
connect to anything, but I just didn't want
you to miss this because it has to
do with the Israeli propagandists online, those rather
Zionist propagandists.
This guy, Max, whatever, I've just I guess
his name is just Max. This is one
of the a prolific manipulator on this platform
and is complete is almost routinely backed up
by the, what's his name here? The this,
you know, the Elon sphere on this platform.
And he came out today
and says this about Simon Godek. Now I
don't agree with everything Simon says, but I
I've covered him plenty of times over the
years, and I feel like he has a
pretty
pos his standing is clear. He showed integrity.
He has very I mean, what the only
things we disagree on are things that I
have a different framing of. Not even that
I think he's necessarily wrong or doing something
manipulative. I I think he does good work.
But I just wanna state there are things
that we've disagreed on in the past. The
point, though, is that you could look at
his work for yourself. You know, going through
COVID and even I think one of the
most important points to look at right now
for people in this field is their transition
between the COVID conversation and what we're dealing
with now.
So many people tried to grab on to
the end of that story and make it
look like they knew the whole time when
they didn't,
only to carry over into, you know, some
support and then very quickly try to pull
you into some other dishonest things. He is
one of the many that I pointed out
that very clearly stood his line and had
integrity and did not just bow to the
new thing that was going on, and I
think that's important.
Because he because there was a lot of
support right then from all of these Trump
side people or rather just conservatives because of
the COVID overlap,
And they were expecting them to just roll
into the next thing. And the people like
this, I think, stood their ground. Even though
it would've been easy to sort of go
like, well, Trump's great or whatever and get
all that support. Well, this guy comes out
and says this account is constantly posting fake
videos and attempting to incite people to commit
mass murder.
Now
fake videos, I should that's, like, you know,
every third post on this ridiculous platform. Not
to say that that's something that we should
be okay with, but you have a right
to share and say what you want. That's
called free speech. At least on the platform,
they claim to care about free speech. But
overall,
I'm not aware of the things he's discussing.
I don't see content that is fake. Is
he posting something that's wrong? Possibly. Even if
he does it intentionally, the point is, which
I don't think so, the point is so
does this guy every single day. More than
these people are constantly misleading us about every
single field of war that Israel's involved in.
But inciting people to commit mass murder? I
mean, this is coming from a Zionist who's
cheering on the killing of children in Gaza
and
and supporting, I guess, because it's worth it,
as we'll get to, according to these people,
to kill the children, the the women the
girls in the girls' school because, you know,
bad Iran.
And he says, if terms of service mean
anything, you should be suspended.
This was today.
Sadly, you know what I predict? That they
will suspend him despite the fact that that's
not true because that's how this platform is
operating, at a level I've never worse than
I've ever seen on this platform.
And so he comes out and says, that's
a blatant lie. I agree. I have never
posted fake videos, and I I agree with
that. My point is to be objective, though.
I could have missed something, but look at
his content for yourself, and you'll see what
I mean. And he goes, I have never
incited anyone to commit mass murder. I agree
with that. False accusations like this are defamatory.
What's especially grotesque is that the same, Jew
making these claims still openly celebrates mass killing
when Israel detonated the pagers. True. And just
in case you think that's some kind of
this person is Jewish. It's not a derogatory
use. The point is, clearly, these people are
out there supporting openly mass killings. Pager attacks,
Gaza, every go through this person's account. It'll
blow your mind. If the rules mean anything,
this kind of smear campaign should not be
tolerated. And look. It's easy to see this
from a part a,
you know, religion
or or biased or or a bigoted perspective
from any kind but the end of the
day
and I've seen him make this point as
well, Simon, that you can point on this
platform that people are out there like, the
the point that was happening during Black Lives
Matter, for example. You can make a point
about black people, it's censored. About white people,
it's not. Now whatever your stance on any
of it, whatever your opinion, that's just objectively
not correct. It has to be eve even
reality or not. And we see it happening
today with Zionism and Jewish people on this
conversation. I personally think it's because Zionism wants
the world to think it's only about Jewish
people, and it's very clearly not. I'm not
gonna go into it all right now because
that wasn't the focus today. But, overall,
think about how crazy this is that you
have these people supported by Elon Musk who
are out there now just cooking up blatant
misrepresentation
to try to get people who are getting
traction about the things they're trying to lie
about removed from this platform. We just saw
the co the Coalition for Conscious,
I forget the something. Con it was Mike
Preisner's,
platform on here about showing people that they
have the right to refuse war or conscientious
objector. And Twitter centered it for almost twenty
four hours until they got so much pushback,
they had to bring it back. It's it's
just so frustrating that we have to deal
with these
screaming morons out there that try to act
like we this is all with saving free
speech, and it's all you know, it's just
you can fight for these people if you
believe in what they're doing, but at least
be honest about what they're doing. That's the
conversation I say about the constitution, right, where
I say, look. If you wanna argue that
you think that, for example, Trump should be
able to ignore the constitution when it comes
to certain situations, like with immigration, fine. Make
your argument. Lay out why you think that
makes sense. But don't come out and say,
shall not be infringed, absolute, constitution, liberty, and
then say, but because Biden,
that's ridiculous. You're a child. That doesn't make
any sense. You know? And if you wanna
make an argument about why that might be
the reality, I'll listen. I like to hear
con you know, arguments that take your mind
outside of what you already think. Give me
your fact based argument for why that might
be the reality. But none of them do
that because most of these people are not
in honest positions.
And this is what they do because they
do not have an argument that wins, guys.
Very important to think about. Now, on that
point,
pretty much every person that I can see
up there that's right now trying to pretend
this is not important, Epstein files,
is like the exact same category.
I mean, I'm I'm you look for yourself.
I don't wanna be hyperbolic.
But I I see a very clear line
between people who are like, yeah. But this
matters. You know? But whether else whether they're
talking about other things, whether they still think
Trump is innocent, but the Epstein files is
important.
Always has been. That's why they ran on
trying to make this clear.
And yet, you'll find an an an unbelievably
clear line of people who are trying to
pretend that suddenly it no longer matters or
that everything's already done or whatever the narrative
around it is and the people who are
supporting for war on Iran, supporting war on
Gaza, and supporting Israel blindly. It's not hard
to
see. Now this is Daily Mail from the
sixth. I actually want almost missed this. I've
this is I mean, today, it's the eighth
or ninth. Excuse me. I haven't seen very
much coverage of this at all. And it's
it's really not a huge addition. It's everything
else we already have is pretty this is
just an,
additional point to add to it. And this
is the only the one that they talked
about and the one that I saw. There's
probably tons more in there. And, in fact,
I forgot about this, by the way. Give
me in the chat. Do you remember what
the number was when you searched for Donald
Trump's name in the Epstein files? What was
the number? Wasn't it, like, 4,000 something? I
can't remember now. I don't wanna misquote it
because last time I checked today, it was
about one thousand eight hundred. And I think
that's I can't remember what it was, so
I didn't wanna make the point. But if
you can remember I tried to look for
my pictures, couldn't find it. So if you
remember what the number was, let me know,
and I'll at least reference that. Because the
point is, I think that they're actively,
actively still hiding things, removing things. And as
far as I can tell, they're still standing
with, we're not releasing anything else, despite that
being a violation of the law, which is
the Epstein Transparency Act. Now, Bondi releases missing
Epstein file.
Missing. Whoops. I guess it just slipped under
her desk or something. Right? Stunning Trump allegation.
The just the justice department has published an
FBI interviews with a woman who alleged Donald
Trump sexually assaulted her. Now right there, as
always, be objective. Be be you know, don't
be like the people you're trying to, you
know, call out.
The point is that could be a lie.
Right? That could be something that got
political, you know, motivation, any number of those
things. It also could be true.
If we can't acknowledge all those possibilities right
out of the gate, then you're you're part
of the problem today.
That he sexually assaulted her. And, of course,
add to that this like, oh, I guess
I kinda said that. You could argue this
was being put forward to go after him
because of, you know, pull I got I
did say partisan, you know, political
motivation.
But so, ultimately, that she's saying saying that
Donald Trump assaulted her when she was a
teenager and after he was introduced to or
she was introduced to Epstein. The woman told
agents Trump to hit her after she bit
his penis when he attempted to force her
to perform oral sex. Pardon for the crude
discussion.
So this is out there. Here's the document
itself.
It's just one more addition, but how many
things like this can we actually ignore at
a point when this wasn't somebody you know,
I mean, like, I guess I guess you
could argue this was overlapping with him be
in being, you know, influential in the political
conversation. So somebody could decide to lie about
him. That really does happen quite often, actually.
But overall,
this is only one example. There's so many
that go back well before
the overlap with politics.
Right? Like the one I keep pointing to
in regard to the affidavit or the
multiple witnesses that said on the record under
threat of perjury that that she they were
raped by Trump or the many different examples
that there's provably haven't investigated like the Zorro
Ranch conversation.
Now I've got over all this. It's just
important not to let this drift away, guys.
They are on the record unequivocally
breaking the law around this and are now,
at the very least, being proven
to not investigate things and so too did
the rest. It's not about just Trump, but
here we are with his ability to do
something and they're not.
At least last time I checked. And that's
huge.
That should be enough over everything else, guys.
The FBI spoke to her four times. Okay.
So right there, that says a lot to
me.
Because the at the end of the day,
guys, you you you I mean, well, always
consider, I don't trust the FBI.
I trust the less than most most anybody.
But, nonetheless, they, for whatever reason, had four
different meetings with this person about whether or
not or, you know, flushing out this investigation.
Seems like it's a lot of wasted time
and effort, resources, you know, but it can't
be still could be politically motivated.
Now as I understand it, though, this is
2019 that is being discussed
and saying
2019.
So so it's basically
I've if I remember correctly, at least the
old the one point to make before I
I don't want to skim down and find
it again, is the older ones I was
discussing
are taking place and reported long before he
was Trump presidential running candidate. And I think
that's really important. Because they that that you
I think it's more I'd never think it's
I've always think it's important to include that
people out there, whether they wanna be famous
or whether they wanna, you know, hurt the
other side, I've personally seen things like we've
all seen them. People that come out and
lie about people who are in power for
their own attention. So my point is when
you find them before all that, they just
seem like they're they it's a little bit
more possible, I guess, if if that makes
sense. And so I think at this point,
including all this, I don't know how in
the world anybody could pretend like we know
he's not guilty.
I'm still gonna argue that we don't this
this is all subjective. And the ones we
have
are very clear evidence, but I've they could
still possibly be lying. I don't see any
evidence of the investigation,
so we have to be
honest about that and say that that's not
fleshed out. But to say that he's not
guilty, now that's just a flat out lie.
You could in in the sense that you
don't you don't know that for sure. Because
clearly, there's a lot of evidence pointing in
this direction. If you were an investigator or
detective, this would be, okay, we got something
here. Clearly. Just like with Derek Burrows' investigations
around the Mormon church point. If you go
through those investigations again, it kills me how
obvious that stuff is and nothing's ever happening.
Same kind of point when you understand the
very clear connections with Mormonism and the higher
conversations we're having here, whether about Zionism or
the US government, goes back a long way.
I mean, they're and they're not they're on
the record. Zionism literally calls Mormonism like an
extension of itself. It's just probably more to
that than we think. The FBI spoke to
her four times between August
2019
after Epstein's arrest, but only a summary of
one of those interviews had been included. Well,
that's interesting. So that means with their, whoops,
we missed one, and now they're still whoopsie
missing the other three. I wonder why.
You think those are buried in the other
pages they're never gonna release? Or you know
what I mean? Like, this is a choice,
guys. Anyway, I can leave it there. This
I don't I think this is important. And
it goes on just to give you more
details about the obvious nature of all this.
They're hiding from this.
And another opening point from yesterday,
Fox News apologizes for using old video of
Trump. If you didn't see it yesterday, Trump
went out in a baseball hat or whatever
you wanna call it, a hat, you know,
his USA white hat. And when they were
doing when they were the in front of
the procession of bringing out a a killed
soldier.
And, you know, you if you care about
that, I mean, I I that's a small
point for me. Honestly, I don't even think
I don't see it as that disrespectful with
the different times today, but, you know, take
it for what you will. And my point
is people got upset about that. They thought
it was disrespectful.
And Trump
tried to tell basically pressured Fox News not
to play it. And instead, they basically lied
to people and put out the old an
older version
showing Trump without a hat and different clothes
and just and just played it as if
that was the one. And everybody caught him,
and everyone said that's dishonest. And the point
was Fox News is basically
working for Trump. And it's no different than
CNN, Democrat, or just our government and media.
See, that's the way you gotta look at
it. It's not about left or right. I
mean, they do have differences,
but it is about the control of flow
of information,
and that's the power they have. And now
they apologize. Oh, okay. Apologize because you got
caught?
Clearly, you didn't care. Otherwise, you you got
you apologize because you got caught. So all
that's all this means, and they'll probably do
it again tomorrow.
Fox News apologizes for using old video. Oh,
and this was the, oh, sorry. That was
just the the breaking news part of it.
This it was actually from the New Republic.
Plenty of people covered it as well.
Now we went over yesterday reports of US
service been deployed under guise of training.
Now please keep an eye on that and
send me anything you find because I really
do think this is important, and I think
it's only gonna get more obvious. As I
said yesterday, I believe very clear I think
there are people on the ground. And I
mean that in the sense of, like, actual
military in in whether we're talking about on
the border or actually in locations in Iran.
That's my complete opinion based on the evidence
we've seen, based on the reality of reports
coming from servicemen that they were boots on
the ground tomorrow, and I think that was
the sixth, and that there's plenty of reports
of people,
like, overwhelmingly
reaching out to the hotline
trying to find out ways to be a
conscientious objector. Now why would that be happening?
Why would there be hundreds of those reports
if we weren't deploying?
I mean, you could argue it's because they're
reacting to the idea. That's certainly possible. But
I think it's important that we think about
this on top of the fact that Mike
pointed out that there are reports from these
servicemen speaking to him that are saying that
they were being told it was training, excuse
me,
training and then being winding up being deployed.
Now, like, the people were arguing, well, it
doesn't matter. They're in the military. They can
do what they want. Okay. I kinda disagree
with that. But either way, end of the
day is it's still manipulative, and that's the
real point. They're lying to the people they
respect so dearly to get them to do
something they claim they all wanna do. That
doesn't line up, does it? Also, Graham publicly
said Trump is resetting the world
And talked about Cuba, Mexico, and we all
of it. Right? And so let's get into
that as well.
Here's what he said. This quick clip about
the new forever war in the Western Hemisphere,
anyway.
Since we formed a coalition to
eradicate ISIS to The Middle East, we must
now do the same thing to eradicate the
cartels at home.
Yeah. Right. The cartels. The same cartels that
they are working with on a regular basis.
I mean, and I I I didn't include
it this time, but in yesterday's show, since
we went over it more depth, I included
that. The the clip that Jason made. I
actually let me see if I can get
the pop up anyway.
Nope. Well, here's the show. Here's the show
that that we discussed this. So here's at
least the show. The he did a good
clip on that. It's about twelve minutes that
really broke down all of the different points
that we discussed. The US government's long documented
cartel connections. And, again, as the one I
just showed
the one that I showed yesterday as well
that I show every time, that's just crazy
that they can't even pretend like this is
not like, of course, you could argue this
is one corrupt entity, you know, but but
the it's sprawling
how clear it is. The look it up
how many times Israel's been caught. I think
at least two major ones that I've found
funding,
arming the cartel members.
19 or the war the wiretap. The DEA
laundered $19,000,000
of cartel drug money into cash and crypto,
but we're fighting them. You know? It's it's
obvious there's more to this story.
So the point
is that we're fighting a new war against
the cartels
or drug trafficking or terrorists or, you know,
whatever we wanna call, whatever we end up
bumping up against and decide we wanna take
over. That's what this becomes. And all the
people screaming about no more forever wars, no
more regime change, and now it's all democrat.
Yay. Forever war. It's insane how ridiculous it
is. That's what we're talking about. The Shields
of America with apparently Kristi Noem at the
helm because that makes you feel great after
she just got exposed for massive corruption,
millions of dollars going to companies that no
one knows about, that don't exist, that have
never worked before. You know? Oh, and then
here here is McLaughlin. I know we just
moved you out of the administration, but here's
millions of dollars for a campaign. You know,
it's it's profiteering. It's corruption. It's the whole
damn administration. We'll get to the fact of
the Trump sons and their drone investment and
the war overlap. And it's just one more
example of the whole damn thing. But overall,
that we're talking about a a effort
to,
you know, one, claim that you like, the
Monroe doctrine brings all everything's coming back around,
that they have somehow the right to control
this entire area. They do not.
On top of that, that now this is
a justification, which they've already started doing, to
continue, by the way, what they've already been
doing, which is unilaterally execute people in the
middle of the ocean regardless of whether you
think those are crimes being committed under US
law, by the way, which still makes no
sense if you understand anything about how the
world works. At the end of the day,
they've always started that. They've already been doing
it, and now they're just gonna initiate this
in a larger sense, and they just did
it again. We I guess we just take
their word for it that they bombed people
that were doing something wrong. And, again, in
their mind, doing something wrong would be to
say the wrong thing about Israel or to,
you know, have the wrong opinion or to
wear the wrong thing. That's both sides of
our government right now.
Antisemitism
or whatever they wanna call it. Now on
top of that,
we have Venezuela, we have Cuba, we have
Nicaragua, we have I mean, it just it
just never stops. Somalia, Sudan,
Nigeria. I mean, this is the peace president,
we're told. No new wars except those three.
Right? Not not the three. I there's three
we'll get to or many more than that
if you understand the reality. And he this
is them just gloating first about Venezuela.
Right? The the the one right now that
Trump, as we just showed you, Delso Rodriguez,
that Trump threatened with indictments that they didn't
play ball. They didn't do what Trump wanted.
But let's pretend this is still democracy. I
mean, are we are we even they're not
even trying to carry that over. They just
yell democracy. How long have I jokingly made
that point? As long as they just yell
democracy and freedom, and here we are. Where
they just Trump picks her. We want you.
And if you don't do what I want,
then we're gonna remove you. But, know, it's
democracy. For for Venezuelans get what they want
that we tell them they want.
And he's gonna tell you, we stole all
their gold, and we're taking your oil. Yeah.
In what way does this benefit the Venezuelan
people as he tries to say in the
end? But we know Cuba,
Mexico, because that's the major point with this
overlap to the cartels. They're now aiming at
Mexico. They told you they were gonna go
this direction. Don't forget the Technate map. All
of it. That's why they talked about Canada.
They talked about,
what was the, you know, Greenland and Panama
and, you know, and Mexico. It's it's all
part of this agenda, and it's not even
secret. So here he is telling you, brazenly,
that we just robbed them of what their,
I mean, their resources.
Tell me how this lines up at all
with what they were promising at the very
least.
We signed the first, licenses for critical minerals
to start flowing and precious metals. On Friday,
there was $100,000,000
of gold that
So he briefly says precious metals. Don't forget.
This was the entire point that we said
in the first place. Lithium, rare earth minerals.
Oh, you're such a conspiracy theorist. Even the
conservatives.
It's about freedom for the Venezuela people. But
no more regime change more simultaneously, though, because
I'm a smart person. Guys, it's obvious this
is part one of the major points this
was about. And instantaneously,
we see this happening.
But, look, it's as as we've always said
over the years, it's not like it's only
one or the other. It's just about resources,
control, and wealth, and influence. So money, gold,
oil, all of it. But, yes, it was
always about that.
As Elon said, we'll coup whoever we want.
Came from Venezuela to The United States. That's
for both industrial purposes as well as
licenses for critical minerals to start flowing and
precious minerals. On Friday, there was $100,000,000
of gold that came from Venezuela to The
United States. That's for both industrial purposes as
well as other commercial uses.
Venezuela's
got $500,000,000,000
of resources of gold, but they've also got
other critical minerals bauxite for aluminum, which we
need for defense and for consumer goods.
They've got coal resources that can be used
to help generate power,
to begin to help us win the game.
Right? Great. We got all this stuff we
can exploit. You got Lindsey Graham over there
just yesterday. He said, we're gonna make so
much money from Iran. Same point here. Cuba.
Oh my god. It's all coming down. Lindsey
Graham is so excited. He can't even stand
it.
This is the guy that right before this,
all the conservatives told you was a rhino,
and he was the worst person. But now
it's like, rah rah. War because they said.
I don't believe most conservatives see believe in
me. I I think that most conservatives right
now are angry about this.
I really do. And I've said that from
the very beginning, and it's only it's wild
how it's only gotten more clear, and still
people push back on it. I think you
know why. I could certainly still be wrong,
but I think it's quite obvious that a
massive portion of this side are people that
actually cared about the things that he promised.
Weird. Right? I mean, I've always said this,
guys. Why would they promise why would they
project
doing the right thing if they thought we
wanted something else?
If we if you take this, you know,
the ridiculous Michael Tracy type opinion that they're
all just the worst people who are all
well, he knew it. They all support it
because all Republicans are stupid.
There's so many of the people, like these
pseudo intellectuals, that have these mindsets that are
shown to be false by the most basic
investigation.
Clearly, most people don't want this. If you
look at the polls, if you look at
everything, not the manipulated stuff, but the long
term reality.
Now I will be the first to point
out in the midst of a of an
agenda, like a at a rack point, you
can get a huge surge in support based
on propaganda manipulation.
But we know today, we should have always
known, that those things are almost use almost
always
manipulated.
I mean, every single time. I mean, I
we're gonna get into a point about that
today, just manipulating the the information in front
of you to give you a certain impression,
whether it's polls or anything else.
But this is just great. So they're gonna
take everything they possibly can. But he's gonna
end by telling you that it's all about
the Venezuelan people. Was raised with China. So
they're rich, rich, rich in minerals. And just
like they passed an amazing hydrocarbon law back
in January, in three weeks, their legislature did
that, in response to the Funny how that
works out. Right? So we passed a law
that allows The US Western industries to come
in and just take everything they can at
a very, very, very low price. Right. Because
it's benefiting Venezuela.
It's the same look. This is the exact
same scenario that happened before they pushed them
out. Right? Back when those oil companies were
there just reaping everything and these Venezuelan people
were left with peanuts. And it's the same
scenario, guys. It's the same thing they do
everywhere. Do we not see what happened in
Iraq? Remember how much they promised? Oh my
god. They're gonna be so much they're gonna
gain from it. How you doing, Iraq? Oh,
they're still being bombed right now and attacked
by US and Israel. That's how that worked
out. How is Libya doing, by the way?
But listen to this guy. I promise it's
all gonna work out.
The US,
that's creating opportunities for investment, for human capital,
and financial capital in their country I haven't
seen. And now, on Monday, in in tomorrow,
they're introducing
a similar kind of change in regime the
laws Oh, what was that? For Oops. Freudian
slip.
That,
in response to The US,
that's creating opportunities for investment, for human capital,
and financial capital in their country I haven't
seen. And Oh, their country hasn't seen. You
know why? Because the US government's been doing
everything it possibly can to stop anybody anywhere
from doing any deals with them because they're,
I guess,
childish or whatever you wanna call it, authoritarian.
That's the reality. It's funny how you wanna
make it seem like we're giving them all
these opportunities. Well, they were all pretty much
there from most people in the world, except
you weren't letting that stuff happen. Because they
have, like you said, lots of wealth, lots
of gold, lots of resources. So let's pretend
like nobody anywhere ever wanted any of that
until you stumbled in and destroyed everything.
I mean, this is why people are tired
of this. Because these old, ridiculous people who
have been giving you the same tired lines
your entire life just go about the same
motions.
The world has changed, bud. You guys are
losing your influence or it's gone. That's the
reality. And now he slips up and literally
says regime change because this is how ridiculous
it is today. Now,
on Monday in in tomorrow, they're introducing
a similar kind of change in regime the
laws,
for all of the critical minerals in mining.
And so when we were down there this
week with both oil and gas executives
from The US and the top mining executives,
these folk Oh, okay. Get that? So, yeah,
they went in there with their top mining
the The US entities, western gov western companies,
and they're in there surveying what they're gonna
take and do. Right? I mean, do you
really believe that these people with this much
influence and no reason of
of any reason to give them anything
are going to make sure that the Venezuelan
people get anything from this?
Or or by the way, a government that's
literally being threatened with indictment if they don't
do what Trump wants is gonna somehow be
able to negotiate benefits for the Venezuelan people.
I mean, if it's just this comes down
to the reality
of what these people are and their history
that is slapping you in the face of
your entire life of what they've always done.
And now somehow it's, well, they're gonna do
the right thing by these people, despite the
fact that every single time they've ever been
in this position and I've ever covered, that's
not what's happened. You look it up. You
tell me I'm wrong. You tell me that
that's the case. Show me what country has
benefited from any one of these actions from
the US government, and I will quit doing
this work.
That's where we are yet again. And here
he is telling you it's all gonna work
out.
Are excited about getting back to Venezuela. They
were often there before in the past. They
see great opportunity.
And I tell you, the people of Venezuela,
they are gonna be putting up a statue
to president Trump as a great liberator.
Guys, these are exactly
I mean, like, the textbook playbook responses
from the Iraq war.
Literally what they're saying.
I mean, e even CNN has a compilation
of what was said then versus what's said
now. It is identical, and it's not unique
to Trump or the Republicans.
This is what they do. They just recycle
these things because these people are just actors
in most cases. They're just playing their roles
to get what they can from the from
the broken game they're playing.
And I don't mean all that necessarily literally.
I'm just trying to make a point in
the sense of what they're really accomplishing. You
think he's there to
fight for the Venezuelan people?
I mean, are we really that naive?
Because he has opened up their economy again
after more than two decades. Yeah. Because they
had because they had it closed. Funny how
that works out. That's important to include, isn't
it? Enthusiasm is high on the ground level
in Venezuela for what their future can be.
And, again, fun to be bringing home the
gold,
for America on Friday from, from Venezuela.
The partnership very strong there with Delce Rodriguez.
Yeah. The one that he just threatened with
indictments.
Literally, if if I I didn't get go
into it in-depth because so much has happened,
but I still have it all. I had
an entire article with, like,
60% of it highlighted about about the reality
of what they it was a Reuters article
about what Trump put out there, what was
being said. And, I mean, this was it
it wasn't again, it wasn't just because the
Reuters article said. This was actually broadly discussed,
and, ultimately, the reality is that Donald Trump
threatened them
with,
multiple indictments if they didn't ultimately give Trump
what they wanted from the administration. And then,
like, at the same moment throughout, they're going,
we've never been stronger. Delsey and I are
doing great. And so it's just
everything they do is a lie. That's just
politics, guys. That's why we it might as
well be synonymous with the word dishonesty. That's
what it is.
In the leadership in Venezuela.
You sound like an Olympic athlete, bringing home
the gold, now that the part part of
it. President Trump has promised a golden eight
You just look at these yucking idiots up
here, like, just literally joking about you know,
like, it just makes me sick to watch
these kind of people downplay the seriousness of
what they just casually discussed.
Just the the casual corruption. Right? The the
the piracy of what we're dealing with.
It's sad.
So stealing gold in one location, you know,
everywhere else as well. Same with Iraq. But
drop site news, Trump is now eyeing surprise
economic deal with Cuba.
See how this works?
This is
not anything anybody should ever praise because what
you're doing is dishonest. It's manipulative. But guess
what? That's the rampant lawlessness
is becoming practice.
That's heg, Seth. That's that's Graham. Punch them
while they're down. I don't want a fair
fight. You know, these are the sentiments that
used to be looked at as
I mean, it's gotta be a better word.
Like, you know, it's just it's it's dishonest.
It is the it is the person in
in the
match or the game or the experience that
is out there trying to cheat, trying to
get one over on you, not be not
with no honor. Right? No respect for I
mean, it's it's you go back here historically.
Even with with enemies, the reality of being
able to meet and have discussions, there's some
kind of a level that is needed in
any kind of like a global dynamic
that they have destroyed utterly,
bombing people when they meet for discussions, which
we'll get to.
And so the point is, guys, that he
comes to Cuba with this threat.
The last week,
Cuba's gonna be going down very soon. You
mark my words. You think I mean, he
knows they see that. That's the point. And
so even if you wanna argue he's some
kind of savvy maneuver, he's doing it when
without any intention to do it, and you
gotta be really dumb to think that's the
reality with every other one that has come
to fruition. But, fine, let's just say he's
threatening because he wants to manipulate or rather,
you know, use the art of the deal
and then goes, oh, well, guess what? Here,
let's make a deal instead.
Because that that's this that that is you
strong arming. That's what that's called. You are
using the threat of violence to push them
to make a deal in in and then
act like you somehow made some kind of
that's not even respected in the in a,
like, a deal making sense.
That's not savvy. That's, like, that's the equivalent
of you tricking that ship and bombing them
and acting like you had some great submarine
maneuver, yet you just tricked them. I mean,
it's in I don't even mean in the
sense of, like, some, you know, cunning
maneuver. You you just you set it up
where they they were you know, anyway, we'll
get into that in a second, a little
update on that. But, so, in this case,
at the end of the day, we're talking
about them threatening, threatening, threatening, and then acting
like you wanna come make a deal. Do
you think anybody in this government would act
like you wanna make a deal with somebody
who, thirty seconds ago, was saying they were
gonna remove your country from the map?
The Trump administration is quietly exploring a potential
economic deal with Cuba that would that ease
some sanctions. Now it it may even happen
because of all this time of the never
ending manipulation of this country.
Talks reportedly include possible agreements on ports, energy,
blah blah blah, which they'll double cross the
second it's in their interest, and the whole
world knows that.
So Cuba on the table. Right? That's well,
if in a deal, maybe, which I guarantee
will still never end up with just a
complete normal, you know,
allied situation because that's this is how it
started, so there's never any real agreement on
top of that.
It's probably gonna go into some regime change
effort, especially if Israel has a say in
it because they don't want anything other than
bombing and destroying and taking.
But not just Cuba. Guess what? Ecuador.
Yep. No new wars. Trump Ecuador voted no
to US military bases in November.
Oh, three months later, the US special forces
are in Ecuador anyway, you know, because that's
how they operate. Right? We're gonna like, even
if it's a small point, we're making they're
making these ridiculously
childish videos about war using video clips.
And one of them was from Tropic Thunder.
And said Ben Stiller was like, you guys
didn't act you didn't
pay for this. You have no right to
use this clip. There was all kinds of
clips in there. But point is, they don't
care. I guarantee you. No matter what happens,
no matter I the the major movie industry
steps up and goes, that's ours, and you
know what? They he probably still won't care
because there's so much hubris and so much
righteous, like, they believe they have the right
to do all of this. They don't.
It's just they they believe they could do
whatever they want. They can't. They still will.
We'll try. So in this case, there's they're
they are, like, every everywhere else they've done,
they're just doing what they want anyway. On
March 6, The US directly bombed targets on
the Colombian border in operation total extermination. Right?
So they see an interest in being there
for their other operation. They don't care what
this government says. You know why? Because they
believe they can do what they want because
none of these governments are able to like,
they don't let's put it this way. They
don't see themselves on an even table with
these other governments.
Whether you're not the more powerful or whatever
else, they are underlings to the way they
see the world. This is the same Trump
that says, we don't wanna be the policeman
of the world, then literally went on to
do exactly that. He feeds you BS like
the rest of them do.
One more location on the never ending not
wars that are not happening.
Now this is just what Grock had to
say about the conflict. One,
the points that you already know, but I
find it interesting that they respond like this,
and I just simply ask, how many conflicts
does he involve in the moment? And or
even according to Grok, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Somalia,
Iraq, and Nigeria. Now that is not all
of them, by the way. And I said,
well, is he not routinely bombing Somalia?
Oh, oh, I'm sorry. Actually, this was the
wrong one. The,
oh, that's interesting. I thought, you know, you
know, either way, the point was
of all the the additional
not just,
bombing or rather not just conflict engagement, but
bombings and military action, which I think is
important to see. Like, so right now, stand
back and look at the full picture. As
where you have
Netanyahu, multiple fronts, Lebanon, Syria, Leban or or,
even Iraq, by the way, Gaza. It's a
multi front war, and the and the point
is people
don't see it that way when we're only
talking about one point of the conflict. So
in this case, everyone they're involved in from
bombing engagement, Iran, Venezuela, Somalia, Syria, Iraq, Nigeria,
Yemen. And there are more than that. When
you understand, like, The Sudan, for example, there
are engagements that are some degree happening or,
as we just saw, Ecuador, which is not
listed there. But, overall,
think about how this in any way represents
the idea of a peace president, of no
more wars. I don't remember this happening. Venezuela
was not an active war before this. Well,
right now, it technically, it gets in the
sense of what they did. That's an active
war. But just now that there's no current
conflict, doesn't mean it wasn't an act of
war when it happened. Or the idea of
Nigeria or Yemen or Syria or Samoa, all
these places that are supposed to be not
happening.
Now you could argue it wasn't Trump's fault.
I wouldn't even disagree that some of these
things happened long before he was there. But,
nonetheless,
all of them are far based on I
mean, you pick which one you wanna look
into are based on falsy
false information, faulty allegations, manipulation.
I mean, Yemen, for crying out loud, has
been starved my entire like, I mean, almost
the entire time I've been doing this work,
and that barely even gets a conversation today.
And still the reality, they're still suffering because
of what they're doing. They're still occupied. They're
still being, manipulated
with ISIS elements that are allowed to work
in their Saudi controlled areas within Yemen. I
mean, it it just never stops. And as
I've said before, the Houthis were the only
ones that stood up against what they were
doing in the water and never sunk a
ship, never stole anything, never killed anybody,
Even though they were taking kinetic action to
stop them. Think about the restraint that takes,
the skill that takes. And yet, they're the
terrorists.
Now, on top of that, unusual whales post,
national debt on track to rise 120%
of GDP
in twenty in twenty thirty six off of
Trump policies,
meaning
a continual increase based on what's happening.
Surprise, surprise. Not with estimation, of course, but
I don't think we're that shocked to see
that.
Now this is the title currently.
Now whether this is relevant or not, I
just thought it was I hate the fact
that these platforms constantly change these titles. For
Israel's Netanyahu,
Trump grants wishes, but his support carries risks.
That's apparently what it currently says. Here's what
it was before,
which I almost feel like this one was,
like, I I almost feel like the new
one is actually more,
I guess, critical.
But it's just strange. Like, why is it
even acceptable for them to do that? To
just alter their title with no update? I
find that's just not what journalism is. But
anyway, for Israel's Netanyahu, Trump grants prayers with
some unwelcome caveats. That's what that's what it
said before.
This is important,
not because Wall Street or, Washington Post says,
but because of what we already had from
before. Net Rubio
literally saying exactly this
and then being challenged
even by Trump.
And this is coming out even more from
people that are inside the conversation
that Netanyahu, as I think it's not gonna
come as a surprise to anybody paying attention,
seems to be the one in control of
this entire thing.
Prime for prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and the Israeli right, president Donald Trump has
been something close to a prophetic fulfillment.
Yeah. That's a little close to the home,
isn't it? Right? That's a little on the
nose because that's exactly that's not even just
some kind of a useful term.
They, in many cases,
call him a prophet.
And yet, at the same time or in
addition, you have our government being told or
our military being told by Hegseth, a religious
Zionist, by the way, that this is God's
war for Armageddon.
Hundreds of people have complained. I'll point that
out again today. Complained.
From, like, 30 plus different units or I'll
I'll get to the numbers in a second.
Off the top of my head, it was
it was a lot.
About the fact that they're being told this
is a religious war. I mean, this is
for Israel. That's their agenda.
And and to call like, just think about
the overlap of the of the, you know,
discussion we've heard about, all of the mosque,
the the red the red heifer and the
sacrificing of it. This is all the same
conversation. Or Besant
talking to Tucker Carlson about giving them all
the land because the bible says, these people
are the very extremists that we're always talking
about. Whatever religion you think is guiding them,
that's the point.
Any of them can be extremist. So it's
just anybody even without it can be extremist.
It's about people who take it to the
extreme and are become radical because of it.
Though through five years in the White House,
Trump answered some of their biggest prayers. He
moved the American embassy to Jerusalem,
recognized Israeli sovereignty of the Golan Heights, both
of which were crimes.
He has no right to do either of
those things, and that's not my opinion. That's
international law. It's been the same ever since.
They just don't care. It's the same it's
like changing the Gulf Of America to Gulf
you know, it's it's just dumb, and it
doesn't actually mean anything. He just writes it
down and just pretends that's the reality.
In this case, both of those things were
major crimes. The Golan Heights was not his
to give away, and it wasn't Israeli territory
despite what they say. And ever since he
gave them that territory, they've been using it
to bomb down on this area, and they've
used it to continue to ethnically cleanse the
area and ripped up the Iran nuclear deal.
Yep. The deal, the JCPOA that they were
always in line with. Even Grok will tell
you that if you care to look or
look at the facts like I've always shown
you. And Trump is the one who personally
destroyed it because that's what Israel wanted. And
they've used that all the way to today.
Fund and it says UN,
UN funding for Palestinian refugees was gutted.
Jewish settlers in the West
Bank, once condemned by Washington,
are now getting their own US passport office.
What was that again, Trump? You condemned the
West Bank annexation? Yeah. Keep keep telling us
that. It's impair this is the thing. Like
the Kurds right now,
he put in resource so did every government
every administration before him, by the way, that
goes back to Syria, Iraq, even before.
But in this reality,
Donald Trump has give them the the the
resources, the funding, the arms
weeks before
they bomb them
in Iran
while pretending they were in the midst of
negotiations, knowing they were always gonna do this.
That all came out.
They've and and
and Israel supports it. Trump came out and
said we want them involved. Now reports from
Israel that they're already conducting ground invasions on
the ground. That's my point. If that's happening,
I'm convinced there are US soldiers and well,
probably not Israeli, to be honest, because they're
not capable, it seems. But either way and,
of course, they want The US to fight
their wars for them. But the point being
that that is something that is
obvious. We all talked about it. And then
Trump comes out two days ago or yesterday
and says, I don't want the Kurds involved.
The only reason he does that is so
the Bennie Johnson morons out there will come
out and go, that's not involved. The Kurds
aren't in. Trump told you he doesn't want
it. Even though they already did it, it's
already done. It's already happening.
He's just trying to distance himself from what
is an obvious crime if it ever comes
to that. Funding separatists, invasion. Like, this is
the very thing they told you they were
never doing everywhere else. This is the moderate
rebels. It's the same point.
And, again, don't miss the reality of
their own US passport office for illegal West
Bank settlers who are some of the most
radical people in the conversation,
who are the ones burning down homes with
children inside, who are the ones beating up
grandmother. You know Trump talks about bopping grandmothers
over the head? That's literally what I just
showed you of these settlers beating up a
grandmother till she bleeds out on the ground.
There's another video that just went around of
you IDF members with them shooting and killing
Israelis,
Palestinians
because and and this was an IDF member
with these settlers that they claim is illegal.
They don't care.
And your government supports that.
Now and the morning of February 28
brought the biggest yet the biggest thing he
gave Israel is the argument. A full scale
attack on Iran by the largest buildup, and
this is the twelve day war point,
of US forces since Iraq war was something
Netanyahu had beseeched American presidents,
Republican and Democrat, to carry out for decades.
Isn't it funny how we can make these
comp on you know, in this weird
echo chamber Twitter discussion that ultimately we can
have these conversations and people protect I mean,
if if we can all publicly acknowledge that
this has been that Netanyahu has personally
weird how long he's been in power. We
don't talk about that. Right? It's okay when
they do it. That ultimately, he's been trying
to manipulate this government into a war with
Iran my entire life. And they say it
plainly right there. Not because they say it
makes it true. It is true because it's
obvious.
Netanyahu has been trying to get US government
to go to war with Iran for decades.
Everyone knows that, but we aren't allowed to
say it sometimes.
For Netanyahu, the risk is that Trump's involvement
won't be enough
to reverse his anemic electoral hopes. And see,
again, a point that we often make that's
supposed to be fake news or antisemitic
until it's obvious when you can see it
for yourself, which is that Israeli media and
apparently even US media are completely okay pointing
out that Netanyahu goes to war to help
himself politically.
Think about casually making that point as if
that's not insane.
War criminal. Somebody who was willing to kill
his own people and others just to maybe
give himself a little bit more power to
remove himself, you know, to make himself not
have to go to jail.
You don't think Trump and the I mean,
look. Trump's administration is quite literally emulating everything
Israel does, right down to the saint sentiments
they're using to describe people in Iran that
they're bombing.
The prime minister who will face traumatized Israeli
voters, they write, this year. Because if you
don't understand it by now and even they'll
cite it in this article,
his own people are furious with him, not
because he didn't do what they said about
Hamas, because they know that they killed their
own people, because they know that they failed
them on October 7. That's a public conversation
in Israel. We still can't even grapple with
that in the mainstream conversation here because they're
all controlled by that same entity
as far as I can tell. I mean,
that that's my opinion, but some of them
you can quite literally prove, funding and otherwise.
And it says, who will face traumatized Israelis
this year trying to escape accountability for the
catastrophic security failures of October 7. And it
says, it is betting the war will prove
to be the latest lifeline
in a
political career defined by magic trick comebacks.
And that's not the only part in there.
I mean, if you don't like, we've discussed
it many times over the years, and there's
more parts in this article too. But Israeli
media will blatantly say it, that Netanyahu starts
war to avoid political outcome. Like, very clearly,
Netanyahu
behind in the polls
is expected to which is wildly unpopular in
Israel,
is expected by some analysts to call an
early election in hopes of
benefiting a surge of popular sport for decapitating
Iran's leadership,
which I mean, you could
I guess that's technically accurate since he killed
the leader, but that implies they destroyed the
lead the the actual it does not happen.
In fact, all of the evidence suggests otherwise.
That one person out of the way, the
sun is now in place, which we'll talk
about, and there's no indication that they had
any any, like, missing a beat at all.
It says this is the biggest thing BB
has ever gotten from Trump,
says a political scientist at Hebrew University in
Jerusalem.
Just the the state the sentiment itself. Biggest
thing BB's ever gotten from Trump, implying that
he's been trying to get things for concessions
yet. That's what the reality is. And how
much have we gotten for that? You wanna
demonstrate one positive outcome, one benefit of any
kind in my entire life that Israel was
ever gaining for the American people.
I won't hold my breath.
Everything else can be forgotten
because this is the big one. See? Even
he's telling you, going to war with Iran
for Israel has always been the big one
they've wanted. You can't hide how clear this
is. For Trump, with con
congressional midterms on the horizon, the war strains
a political base built on hostility on foreign
entanglements or two foreign entanglements,
and to and it comes with the gas
prices already climbing.
I mean, as we continue to get more
and more foreign entanglements, that's ridiculous to pretend
like that's I mean, it's quite it's the
opposite of what's happening.
And it says, many in his camp fault
the president
for letting Netanyahu drag him into what Tucker
Carlson, the pro MAGA podcast host, well, sort
of, I guess, called Israel's war.
Literally is.
Trump, Netanyahu,
at the heart of their hot and cold
partnership, which is not even remotely what this
really is, that's the front that's the the
theater they put on,
but they say is a frequently asked question
of who is really driving whom.
Funny how this used to be called antisemitic.
Right? Here we are.
Well, Washington post at the heart of the
partnership is frequently asked, you know, who's in
control of who who's influencing
whom here.
Yeah.
Way to catch up. About twenty years late,
Washington Post. Carlson isn't the only one who
sees a US president skillfully worked by a
master manipulator
who has spent thirty years yearning how to
get Washington to do what Jerusalem wants.
One of these points we're gonna talk about
more today,
especially next when we get into the Alex
Jones overlap, is how clear this is, how
long we've been telling you this has been
evolving, that the the world sees this now.
And that's it's it was happening before, but
clearly because they shot themselves in both feet
with their belligerent genocide actions after October 7.
And the failures that they the the creation
of that and their failures and the lie
the Lihop discussion of the whole thing.
But overall,
that we're seeing them now
basically, start to tell you that reality, but
a fraction of what you might have known
ten years ago. Right? They're they're barely bringing
you into it. It's so much more obvious
today. The reason, as I've been telling you,
because we, you, us, the independent media, the
honest people of the world, have forced this,
which means you're winning.
Which means after despite the censorship and the
propaganda and AI and algorithms and everything, you're
still getting this through.
And we are still effectively changing the focus.
Think about how I mean, how is that
not a win? But so the point is
that because that's happening, because it's undeniable, because
99% of Alex Jones' own audience are like,
what the f are you doing? Why are
you talking about this? They're forced to go,
okay. I have to protect. So that's the
same thing here with him as well. They
they they're now forcing. They have to go,
now I see it. Oh my god. Look
at the what is he saying here? Pointing
to a clip from 2025. We'll get to
that next. Same thing here with Wall the
Washington Post, all the rest of them. Have
you I mean, when's the last time when
have you ever expect them to say it
like this?
It's because it is obvious and has been
for years, and they were hoping that would
pull back. It has not.
Carlson isn't the only one who sees US
presidents skillfully worked by a master manipulator, that's
Netanyahu,
who has spent thirty years learning how to
get Washington to do what Jerusalem
wants.
My god.
I mean, I could literally say that right
now on Twitter. I'd probably get censored. You
know what I mean? Like, that's how how
broken this all is right now.
Trump has also put the brakes on Israeli
desires to formally annex parts of the West
Bank once more than once. Think of how
dumb it is for them to say that?
Because here's the thing. Trump said that out
loud.
It did not happen
nowhere. There's no actual action happening from Trump
or anyone in his administration
that's even that's even
asking them to stop. He just said out
loud that I'm against the West Bank annexation,
like, recently.
I mean, you realize the article just started
with the fact that he he gave these
West Bank settlers doing the annexation or rather
the occupying and with the government's help with
the annexation, a
US post office, but or, you know, the
passport box we just talked about. So the
point clearly is that's them just giving them
the book. Why would you say that? Is
it happening? No. Has he in action always
supported it? Yes. Did Mariam pay him $200,000,000
to allow them to do it? Yes. Was
it part of the agreement that the last
ceasefire with Gaza that Trump said they could?
Yes. And here he is. You know know
what I mean? Like, it's this is this
is my point. These people, even though they're
saying these things now, are still not on
your side.
This is them trying to gain some level
of support, in my opinion, because now the
world sees this, and there's no going back.
Trump initially stayed out of what he called
a unilateral attack, and that's the twelve day
war. But as Israel efficiently hammered the facilities,
he ordered American bombers and bunker buster munitions
into the fray. By the end, Trump was
claiming credit for a triumph because that's how
embarrassing that is. What a child you must
be to
for us to see the way that goes
than to limp in following their action and
be like, we did it. That's your, I
guess, your one of your many mission accomplished
moments like George Bush,
declaring
inaccurately that Iran's nuclear program had been obliterated.
You could take it either way you want.
You could argue that it was obliterated, and
then somehow magically now they have it back,
which makes no sense. Or you could rightly
argue that what they did was lied about
it then, but the point is still that
they never had it to begin with. Because
all of the evidence shows you that. From
Tulsi Gabbard to the IAEA to everybody, every
single part of it other than Trump and
Netanyahu and their lackeys are telling you that
that's the case. As I've always said, certainly
could have some secret bomb somewhere that I
don't know about, but there's no evidence to
back it up. So what I report to
you is what I can prove. And the
evidence we have is pretty obvious. It's very
one-sided,
and yet they lie about it.
Though the fall through the fall and winter,
excuse me, Trump is insisted publicly that he
preferred a negotiated settlement with Iran. Now remember,
as they were saying this, they were already
funding the Kurds and getting the stuff ready.
Netanyahu increasingly alarmed that Trump might succeed,
you understand, in a negotiation to peace.
Worried about that. That Netanyahu might he's worried
that Trump might actually get peace. I don't
think that was ever in the cards, personally.
I mean, I mean, I could see a
world in which Trump is still trying to
grapple with losing support in this country and
maybe just tries to do that on the
side of it. You know, I I could
see that. But then that's when we got
Netanyahu calling and saying, why are you talking
to them without me? And they said we
wouldn't do it anymore.
That this is literally that time frame, guys.
That's what that was.
And
continuing, Netanyahu increasingly alarmed that Trump might succeed,
flew to Mar A Lago and to the
White House. Everyone let him in that side
door, which Bannon tried to pretend like it
was an insult. No. That was his, like,
literally walking in the back door of the
White House. His seventh visit,
seventh visit in Trump's second term, more than
any other world leader to push for military
action. And it's also seven visits within the
first year.
That's just the guy the conservatives see this.
I I don't know why people can't acknowledge
that.
And he pushed him to war.
A key component of Netanyahu's drive for war.
There's many parts throughout the entire show today,
which I'm gonna try to get to all
of it, that that come back to this,
like Carl Tucker Carlson
claiming he went to try to convince him
otherwise. We'll get to all of it. A
key component of Netanyahu's drive for war came
during visits to the White House in December
and February,
according to two US and Middle East officials
and an adviser to Trump.
All of them said the same thing, who
spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss
high sensitive diplomacy. So because it's anonymity, they
consider that it could be false, like always.
Netanyahu made clear his desire to attack Iran's
ballistic missile program
in coming weeks. Now look. Right there, the
first sentence, it how could anybody,
anybody act like that doesn't exactly line up?
Like, that's that's that's like saying it's Tuesday.
Netanyahu wanted to attack their ballistic missile probe.
Yes. Like, every other day ever.
And realize that's a crime. There's no declaration
of war. There's no legal reason to do
it. Well, that's that that program is not
illegal.
Because realize, they're not even talking about nukes
right there. They're talking about their ballistic missiles
just and they wanted to bomb it. Right?
So this is where the Rubio part comes
into play. The prime minister said Israel would
be willing
to strike Iran
with or without The US involvement, though
he wanted Trump to green light the operation.
Now this is what I think, guys. You
could I could easily see a world in
which this was Trump just as much involved
with this, but I've seen many examples over
the years where I can see that I
feel like Trump is being played Even though
I do think he's amenable to the agenda.
He cares about his his his legacy. He
cares about what he's being seen as. Right?
That's why I often point out how insane
it is that he makes himself look stupid,
and I think that shows control.
But
this is an obvious example
that
Netanyahu, for example, could manipulate Trump
into doing what he wants or any president
we've seen before in this government where he
basically says that we're gonna do this. Right?
So we are gonna do this no matter
what. But it it'd probably be more strategic
or better or make you look like a
better it'd make you look like a leader,
Trump, if you did it. Now whatever you
think the narrative was, every time I've ever
seen this, this is where we are. Where
is and look, there's even been points of
them admitting this, leaked videos and otherwise, where
it will be best if The US starts
this. So we are not the ones on
the table.
And here we are, where you have the
United States government doing something for Israel that
is damaging for everybody.
Apparently, I shouldn't even say other than Israel
since they're being bombed too. But the ultimate
point was this is there's no in any
way positive outcome or benefit for the US
government or the American people in any way
that I can see.
Spending,
you know, of of weaponry, of of resources,
of of money, everything.
To what benefit here, guys? This is Israel
driving the US government to do it. Now
the point became about the nuclear discussion,
where essentially that they were worried that Israel
might use nukes. And I think the only
reason that Rubio threw that in
there well, I guess it could be one
of either. Maybe that was the reality, which
is insane, and it was threatened because they
knew Trump would feel like he didn't want
that to happen and felt like he that
so you could argue he got pressured, which
is ultimately what they ended up going with
in that little two day period where that
was stated. And then they came back around
and said, fake. Trump said, I started it.
It wasn't you know, we fired first, which
then destroyed the reality or the claim
of an imminent attack. That's why the day
later, they went forty seven years of an
imminent attack. Like, they're so reactionary. It's embarrassing.
And it's just like Israel.
But you can see the way this moves.
And here,
as it says,
that, prime minister said Israel would be willing
to strike Iran with or without
you guys, though he wanted Trump to green
light it.
Netanyahu's
determination to initiate hostilities
led Trump, according to the reports, to believe
an Israeli attack was inevitable.
Okay. So right there, even if it was,
that's them
coercing you. That's them saying, I'm a do
it no matter what, so you can decide
for yourself. And then they felt like they
had to. So, from a US perspective and
America First perspective, that's Israel dragging Trump into
it, which is what a lot of people
said, if that's the reality. And he goes,
so Netanyahu's determination to initiate hostilities led Trump
to believe it was inevitable that they would
attack and that the best course of action
was to involve US military power to ensure
its success. And, of course, maybe thinking he'd
come out looking great. You know?
I think what's clear here, what makes the
most sense rather,
is that you could see this the way
I've always seen Trump, even from his the
people around him that use him all the
time. He gets presented. I'm gonna make a
point in a minute about, you know, the
the Loomer influence and the 90% support this,
where people are making the arguments, even Tucker
Carlson, that he is surrounded by people who
are misinforming him about the reality, which is
the same as last time, by the way.
And, again, I don't see him as some
honest player being played the entire time. I
think he's part of this to a large
degree, but I also see that. I see
him being played. And so what we're discussing
is coming to him like this and going,
here's the only two options, mister Trump. And
this one clearly is the you know, but
you choose, you know, because and both of
them ultimately work out for the benefit of
what Netanyahu wanted. They've been doing that's what
they're discussing. This is what they've been doing
for decades.
And on top of all of that, once
it's done, Trump doesn't wanna look like he
got played, so he will die on that
lie, acting like he's the one in in
fact, going so far as to make himself
look like the war criminal just to not
look like you got played by Netanyahu.
Then he continues,
quote, it was a false premise because The
United States could have could have told Israel
no,
said the adviser to the president. But it
was a clever tactic, and it shifted the
momentum in favor of military action. That's what
they believe anyway. The per the adviser of
the president speaking on anonymity.
Or you could argue that's Trump putting him
out there to say that, which might change
the way you read this and might make
a desperate effort to make them look like
they weren't responsible.
You know, who's the who's to say? But
no matter how you look at this,
and not even based on just this report,
but what we already knew, it's so it's
just it's obvious on its face, guys, that
this is being done by Israel. Whatever presidency
you wanna look at. Now Trump is trying
to maneuver this as you I mean, look.
If you wanna make the argument that he
has no other choice and and he's trying
to do his best to avoid nuclear catastrophe,
fine. I disagree,
but at least then acknowledge what's really happening.
Because my argument here, my goal is not
to say Trump bad guy. If you think
that, you're not paying attention to anything I've
ever said. It's about trying to show you
what the US government is doing and always
has done and what Israel's doing through it.
So, fine, if you wanna remove him from
the conversation, that that's up to you. But
still acknowledge the real picture of what that
means and how it's happening.
Netanyahu in late February called Trump with a
specific piece of intelligence. Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei and his inner circle
would be gathering
at a single known location in Tehran on
a Saturday morning.
Israel was ready. Trump decided to go for
it. So let me read this again because
you know what happened. And this is now
why they're trying to make it out to
be that he was in some kind of
deep bunker. That's been shown to be false.
Another fake three d map they put out,
it's clear he was in his same old
up
above ground building
with with plenty of nonmilitary targets involved, including
civilians. The point
is that this is Netanyahu.
According to their people, according to US entities
speaking to Washington Post, Netanyahu
came to Trump late February
and told him
with a specific piece of intelligence saying the
community was in his and his inner circle
would be gathering in a specific location
so they could kill them.
The part that they're seemingly casually leaving out
was that they were meeting because of the
deal that they proposed.
Right? So you have the meeting yet again
gathering all the appropriate people to discuss whether
this might be something they want, and they
murdered them all. Now, whether or not that
was the reality, they murdered them because these
are not these were not military personnel. They
were not involved with the military action. That
is the international reality, guys. That's the law.
You can argue it just shouldn't be the
way. Then make the case. But it is
currently the reality. So that was a crime.
So too is bombing Soleimani
under the guise of diplomacy because it had
to be Iraq, so they tricked him into
coming because of the authorization for 2002 or
any number of other points. That's who these
people are, Lebanon, murdering the entire group because
they wanted to. And now look. Lebanon's kicking
off right at the same time. Like, they
don't even care that we see how obvious
that is.
Clearly, guys, this was an assassination based on
lies that Trump seems to have gotten tricked
into or was fully a part of. You
can decide.
Trump has bigger support in Israel, says the
Washington Post, or rather says an Israeli,
than any place in the world now, including
the Bible Belt in The United States. You
could take that whichever way you want, declining
support here or the reality that he
is more popular in Israel than anywhere else
in the world.
You could I mean, that speaks for itself.
It and this is what he said. Tel
Sheer said, Israelis
see him as basically their president.
Americans, you gotta start listening up. K? You
you just can't miss what's happening.
Here's the intercept.
The Military Religious Freedom Foundation
says it has been inundated
with more than 200
calls. This is the update from last time.
Last time when I when I reported it
last, it was a 110.
200 calls around dozens of military installations,
including a 110
complaints. Oh, that's what I was reporting. So,
apparently, it's 200 calls,
including a 110 complaints filed. So what that
means is 200 people have called about this,
but only a 110 were willing to put
their name down or at least on the
record anonymously
as a complaint. But the but this is
just between Saturday and Monday.
This is insane.
Military leaders see Iran war
as god's divine plan.
You know, it's for how long we've been
talking about this and how many times we've
pointed to these people as the what they
are,
public religious Zionists who believe in the end
times prophecy and the reality that that which,
by the way, necessarily
includes the fall of the West?
How can you even remotely call that America
first if this is what he believes?
And this is and and then on top
of that, they're talking to the military personnel
that are putting their lives in the line
to eventually, what, have the West collapse?
Calling it divine plan. God's divine plan.
As they could the title continues, a chilling
turn for Trump's fascism. Now I don't call
it a turn. I call it people finally
seeing what's always been there because I've been
telling you this has been there. And, look,
you can go back to people long I
mean,
Adam Green, for example, has been making these
arguments about this stuff for a very long
time. And as always, we don't agree on
everything, but I still will always point out
how consistent he has been calling this out
from a very long time ago in regard
to this very clear kind of religious push,
or rather,
more so ideologically, but religious is also accurate.
Here is Trump today.
Not literally today. This is on the fifth,
but, you know, as of current situation.
And I love the way DCF News frames
this. Twenty twenty five, November. What did Trump
say? Pardon
Netanyahu. He is now leading Israel into a
time of peace.
Direct quote. Okay.
See?
What's he saying today? Well,
pardon Netanyahu.
He needs to focus on the war.
I just I I I feel like I
need to this is like the tagline today.
Like, I chase
it. I just because it's so ridiculous how
obvious this is.
That's ridiculous. That that's insane. You're literally just
telling the point is pardon him no matter
what's going on. So what it means, he's
willing to use whatever the circumstances to rationalize
why this per war criminal should be pardoned.
It's like him leaning in with Lindsey Graham
or anything else, guys. He's just showing you
what he really is or at the very
least that he has no control over his
own choices.
Now we just talked about
Twitter
and the many different overlaps with Authentix and
all the different stuff, and it and this
was a recent post of x safety saying,
suddenly, on March 6, no coincidence there, that
they were gonna start massively suppressing certain content
very quickly. And as Daniel writes out, well,
this is why you can't find any accurate
post about what's actually happening in Israel and
Iran. Twitter is functioning as a sensor for
US government and in the name of safety,
just like it did during COVID. Same as
h I t. Different different frame two party
illusion, you know, different same stuff. You know,
it just never stops. So this is where
I wanted to get into this point.
I think this is actually pretty interesting. I
also find it revealing and interesting entertaining in
a way to watch these people spit out
around the conversation they've been lying about. But
overall,
it is actually really revealing about the way
this is all going down.
So first of all, Infowars post this on
the sixth. And I I just wanna make
quickly a point because it has to do
with Authentics and why that's important for the
next part.
But it really bothers me because they've done
this to me before. In fact, they've used
my content on band.tv and use my and
then and then once it got called out
for why you never posted TLav or cropped
my name out, instead of adding the information,
they deleted the content.
I literally, if you don't remember, the last
American vagabond, as far as I could tell,
was the only person ever banned from banned.tv.
Not a joke, by the way. I proved
it. I still I mean, I could probably
still bring up the account. It literally was
on there, and they just removed me. Quite
quite the censorship free platform. How insane is
that?
So my point, though, is that they that's
happened more than once, and we've talked to
people in the past that overlap, and Cooper
or or,
you know, Dave Knight,
Aaron Schroeier, Schroyer, any number of the ones
that have left, guys. All of them tell
you the same thing. They don't check their
sources. They rush out to one there it's
partisan manipulation.
I don't know how many times we need
to hear that before we understand what they're
actually doing. So what what kills me about
this is we just talked about this excellent
article from Alan McLeod from MintPress News. Right?
It's it's entitled X users find their real
names are being Googled in Israel after using
X verification software,
Authentix.
Authentix being something that you that we have
been screaming about since 2023.
Israeli unit, eighty two hundred Tide Company, that's
Authentix, runs Twitter verification.
Followed up in 2024 after Elon lied and
said he was gonna remove it, Twitter still
using Authentix.
Okay? And at the same time, the discussion
was Israeli soldiers arrested for gang rape, protected
by the leadership, but forget about all that
apparently.
So this is what bothers me.
You can watch this for yourself. He doesn't
mention Alan's name. I don't even hear him
say Mint Press News. Now maybe it happens
outside this
twelve minute clip where he's entirely discussing the
story. But look at look at what it's
cropped out entirely.
Yeah. It does say support MPN. I'm not
I mean, look. I'm not gonna say it's
entirely devoid of it. But don't you feel
that strange that you make this whole discussion
about it and you don't actually cite the
person or put their name on or MintPress
News logo? And from the very beginning, I
love how they do this on this platform.
They print these things out like that somehow
makes it look more
why are you printing these things out? It's
just to make it look like you're doing
source material investigation. It's just printouts from usually
their website, and it says it very tiny
right there. Mintpressnews.com.
That's it.
I find that really insulting, but maybe you
disagree. Maybe you think it's a small point.
I just wanna point that out because it
happens all the time. These people are scooping
up, you know, whatever. The point is that
they,
I think, went out of their way not
to do that. One, because I don't think
the source material is something they want you
to see. And two, because it's then there's
their work. Right? Infowars, the largest honeypot operation
on the planet
is the way that they frame this.
I don't I I don't know if I
would agree the largest, probably. But this is
Twitter we're talking about. Right? Authentics. Israel. Twitter.
Okay. Do you do you know Alex's relationship
with all those things? Well, it says Twitter
users find their real names being Googled. Yep.
I we covered it. It's an important story.
Okay.
Well, here's here's Alex on the seventh.
Do you take note of what is his
name?
Alex Jones, literally, citing Twitter in his broadcast.
Apparently, totally okay with the largest honeypot operation
in the world. No big deal, though. Right?
And mean and literally in a podcast where
he's discussing
why Trump is, you know, he's confused about
why Trump is talking about, you know, the
Israel lobby.
I can't even believe this is where we
are right now. It's insane to me. President
Trump acknowledges that the most powerful lobby is
Israel's lobby.
March 7. You mean you mean back in
2024,
2025?
This is deflection, guys. This is I mean,
think about this. With all that we've been
discussing,
to now, to pivot to this with what's
happening is, I think, a desperate effort to
try to gain back some, some influence to
people that clearly see you ignoring this conversation.
But just, basically, also, maybe just to stop
you from paying attention to the catastrophic thing
that he told you would never happen if
Trump was in power, which is the I
mean, has he talked about this being World
War three? Isn't it funny how he says
that about every flinching move Russia makes, but
here we are and maybe he has. I'm
not watching all his content, but I find
it humorous though that this has always been
the case. And if he's not, that would
be very revealing. But here's what this video
I'm not gonna play it all, but I
wanna play the beginning of this.
So here's Trump
saying the most powerful lobby is the Israel
lobby.
This is Jewish than Israel lobby, a foreign
power.
He basically says, watch out, Congress,
because more and more you were going against
what Israel wants, and that's anti Semitic.
The most You see his even his eyes?
Like, that's a new story. You mean, like,
every other Tuesday?
Left and right?
Now he plays this clip. You've seen this
clip probably 1,500 times from me going back
to 2024, 2025.
Now what I also point out is is
I will go to the thread that I've
shared is how many times that's well beyond
this one clip over and over and over
and over.
Powerful
lobby
that there is in this country
is the Jewish lobby.
It's the Israeli lobby.
It's not that way anymore. You have a
lot of people in your way. You have
a lot of people that,
don't wanna
help Israel.
You have a lot of people in Congress
that don't like
Israel. You have a lot of people in
congress that, in a way, I think, Mike,
we could say it. Right? I talked about
all of this while he was running. So
did a lot of people because it was
important then. See, far less important now to
reactionary
looking backward go,
what's happening back then in 2025?
Clearly seems a little bit manipulative, doesn't it?
Maybe it was more important to point this
out when he was running for president, Alex
Jones, when you were gaslighting us all into
supporting him and calling us blackpilled and purity
test. And here we are.
There. You're doing an amazing job, Michael.
You do they hate they hate Israel?
Here.
Since October 7,
Israel's enemies have learned
a hard truth.
Those who attack us
pay a heavy price,
but those who partner with us advance progress
and security
for their peoples.
President Trump just said it. It's also in
the Bible. It says those who will bless
you will be blessed, and those who will
curse you will be cursed.
I love to pretend that means this modern
illegitimate Zionist state of Israel that was given
to them by Britain. Somehow that all winds
up.
And that's actually what is happening.
We want the blessings.
I think we've done a lot in the
past two years to end the curse.
Right. Right. So we want your we want
the blessings. We demand that you bless us
because what you know, that's what the bible
says.
Yeah. Way to catch up, bud. Way to
catch up. We're not finished,
but we've done a lot. And we've done
a lot together to end the curse.
Now
let's go to clip 17. Trump says Congress
is becoming anti Semitic and isn't serving the
Jewish lobby well enough.
I mean, again, folks, this is making everything
front and center.
Our entire foreign policy, our domestic policy, our
economy,
everything hinging on this. And then people like
Mace and and and Massey Looks like the
Bethlehem Blue is not working too well anymore.
And then Tucker Carlson in the media
criticized this stuff mildly, and then they're called
anti Semitic.
Trump is literally turning on his base and
and then making it all about
the base versus Jews
as if this is all one monolithic group
of Jews. It's just
it's just mind blowing, ladies and gentlemen. Yeah.
You know, it was mind blowing when it
was happening back in 2025, Alex.
It's not mind blowing to point back to
old videos acting like we're this is not
a new conversation.
Why is he doing it now in the
midst of this ongoing World War three he's
trying to point to? Or, you know, I'm
not like, look. Like I've said to make
that clear, I've said it over the years
plenty of times. We've met the metrics for
what we called World War two many times
since then, in my opinion. But I'm not
gonna jump in every shadow and claim that
every action that's being taken is suddenly World
War three, even though we could argue we've
technically been in some form of that, like
a Syria overlap. That's the point to make.
My point is how often he tends to
go, World War three, because Russia says we
could use nukes in a possible or rather,
we don't count that out of our choices.
And they go, oh, he threatened nukes.
All the time that happens from this guy.
But so now
doesn't this seem weird to you? Doesn't this
seem a little bit out? Like, this is
very embarrassing, quite frankly. If you look at
the comments, his own audience is calling this
out.
And so it's getting worse and worse and
worse. No. No. Not were we're there. It's
done. It's happened.
Getting worse was back a couple years ago.
Now we're there. Now not we're getting worse.
We're actually in it. We're doing the war
for Israel. That's what's happening.
Here's, president Trump.
As president of The United States, I will
always support Jewish Americans, and I was always
Pretty sure he literally got this compilation videos,
everyone he's playing, directly from my thread.
Always be
a friend and a champion to the Jewish
people.
Israel. I'm just getting past it because you
guys have seen these clips. By federation Yeah.
Thing and loving standpoint. He could never understand
And what I was pointing out to minute
you get censored, you get attacked.
That there is in this country There's nothing
is the Jewish law
Back this up ten seconds, please.
Now, again,
if you, twenty years ago, even said that
there was a Jewish lobby, you would be
called anti Semitic. You'd get censored. You'd get
attacked. Yeah. This sounds like my show from
2024.
And we've argued about who the most powerful
lobbies are. You got the big BlackRock, and
you got the defense groups. You got Oh,
yeah. Yeah. BlackRock. Larry Fink who's, like, literally
Trump's right hand man. You know? Like, I
should say literally. But as I've shown you,
he is in inner circle of Trump. Right?
Or the other lobby like, what he's trying
to do is pretend like it's not clear
that the Israel lobby is overwhelmingly the most
large. It's very clear. Sorta like he told
you, Palantir was a small little democrat thing
they hated. Or, you know, the democrats hated
small little thing. They're over blowing it. No,
guys. This guy is trying to lie to
you or he's just that bad at his
job.
At the teachers union and all that stuff.
But when it comes to foreign policy,
we've known it's Israel for a long time.
But the ADL You even make sense of
that with what he's been doing and the
work he's done and the supporting of this.
I mean, everything you could point to shows
you a gaslighting scenario, sort of like when
he said in the past where Trump may
be the antichrist, I don't know, and then
went on to support him in every possible
discernible way. That's the kind of game that's
being played here. Saying they're giving throwing you
the token point and then continuing the same
thing is manipulation.
We talked about it until recently. We'd literally
call for your arrest. Then they called for
my arrest. And I'm not foaming at the
mouth anti Israel just to get to Israel.
I'm like, I don't want Israel and their
spies and their operatives
trying to run our government, running our government,
and leading us around by the nose and
trying to make us pay for and fight
and die for the greater Israel project.
I mean, could you And and and then
they try to Leave it there because it's
just like it's like he's trying to insert
all of the main thing. Like, these are
the things that we've talked about forever. Now
look. I'll point out that these sentiments like
the great he's mentioned these things before. It's
not about the token point. It's about the
action, the outcome. What have you what have
you ended up supporting? What have you focused
on? And every single time, it's partisanship. It's
team. It's it's not about the reality of
what Israel's doing. Like, if you wanna make
a case about what they're doing, then make
the effing case. Prove what I can prove
that they are doing it, that Trump is
literally working for this government, that we can
see the influence on this government.
But you won't get that. Mark my words
as this person says all of this and
then goes right back when it matters to
driving you to support the team. Watch. It'll
be some kind of a difficult situation and
we're grown ups and, you know, it's Trump
didn't have any choice and I know it's
hard and I don't support it, but at
the end of the day, we gotta stand
with the God. Watch.
Watch. I hope not. I really do because
I'd like to believe that we can all
evolve and change, but
watch.
Now you can watch all these if you
want. Again, it's quite literally
every all of these. It's a long thread
of all the different times Trump was saying
all these things. Now here are some ones
to make sure we understand are
long time ago. Right? I mean, this goes
well before when I started covering this in
2024.
Right? August 2024.
Here's just a couple that I think are
always important to play.
And that it's the, the one you the
radio show he went on and discussed exactly
that, which if he cared, that was widely
shared at the time and should have been
talked about 2024,
you know, as he was running for president
for Israel.
And then the other point of,
basically getting rid of the Jew haters in
the world and that or in the country,
which I'll make the point when you come
to that about why that's you know, whether
that's what they're actually doing or not. It's
about a sentiment, free speech, whole point.
You know, the biggest change I've seen in
congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
Here.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our It's the same it's
the same one every time.
At what point did you suddenly did you
suddenly start to be a removable point to
have a hatred towards anything
or to say something or to feel a
certain way?
So, first of all, most of the people
they're pointing out when they say that are
people that have different opinions about Israel. Not
Jews, but Israel. And that's why they conflated
these things, conflated anti Zionism with anti anti
Jewish. Same point. But either way, even if
you think that's all of it,
what when did you not have the right
to say that? Can you say, I hate
white people? Can you say, I hate these
you could say anything. But, certainly, you can't
say, You hate Jewish people. Which, again, is
not even what I think they're actually pointing
at. Because I will say the same thing.
If you out there hate irrationally a group
of people based on their religion, their creed,
whatever, I think you're disgusting. I think that's
an irrationally childish and incorrect thing to do
because it's
a broad brush. It does not it's it's
dishonest.
But regardless, you have a right to say
and think what you want. You see, that's
actually having integrity. That's principles. You can say
what you want. You can think what you
want. And if you wanna go out there
and rationally hate Jewish people, that's your right.
But apparently, not in Trump's world that he
screams free speech about liberty and constitution and
all that. This was important then. It's important
now, but a little less so as we're
literally being pulled into the war that we
might have been able to at least hold
off longer, maybe stop, should we have been
clear about that before.
Now and and that's not some kind of
argument for Kamala Harris. If you actually think
that's where we are, my god. You're still
lost in this conversation. End of the day,
I just think this has to be exposed
for what it really is.
Oh, yeah. And, of course, you know, the
reality of Donald Trump here with his $230,000,000
coming. And it's more than that when you
understand it because the 200,000,000 alone is just
for Miriam Adelson. There's plenty more that we're
talking about here.
Oh, and then just, you know, I just
wanted to point this out in case you
just don't take it from me alone as
he's kind of being shocked. I'm shocked about
this video. All of a sudden, that even
Grok will tell you is from 2025.
How does that even make sense? How are
you gonna suddenly be shocked about a video,
multiple videos that are from a from 2025
while we can all see what's going on?
That's that's that's theater. That's performative theater.
Now Julian points this out, and this is
what I I I wanna make this case
to show you
everyone
sees this.
Here's the ADL.
On March 5, any suggestion that APAC, an
American organization, which it's really not. It was
clearly, as you can even prove on Wikipedia,
started in Israel as a different group. I
forget the exact name on top of my
head.
Following the assassination assassination of JFK, who, by
the way, was in the midst of trying
to get the a APAC to register as
a foreign entity,
ultimately changed its name, repositioned its entire you
know, basically created the impression
that it was an American group. I mean,
you could prove this. I've I've done it
on the show, but that's why everyone calls
this out. And it says, is anything but
a pro American flat out it's flat out
wrong and offensive. It's American group. It's fine
to disagree on policy, but dual loyalty trope,
you know, the same trope that they'll literally
tell you is important for every Israeli. That's
how this is my point about all of
this. They'll make they'll have entire shows about
why it's important, and then when you say
it, that becomes a problem. It's an and
to let's be clear. Dual loyalty is not
about only Israelis. That's as we've been as
even Massey has made clear. It matters whether
you have dual nationality while you're in a
position of power. Of course, it matters. But,
apparently, you're not allowed to say that only
when it comes to Israelis.
That's why someone like Brian Mast wearing the
Israeli uniform in congress is somehow not a
problem. Can you imagine that being a Chinese
uniform, even a British uniform? People would lose
their minds, and rightly so, over either of
them. But so
Julian says you're embarrassing yourselves. Nobody believes it's
propaganda anymore, and even Twitter
calls him out. I mean, it's just insane
how clearly people are seeing this, and that's
why you get the Alex Jones suddenly going,
what's happening?
I can't believe what I just saw, and
then tries to pull you back in at
some point.
And here, just to make the point even
further about what this person continues to do,
let's take a step back.
05/09/2025.
Alex Jones' prediction
that president Trump will completely cut ties with
Benjamin Netanyahu
comes true.
Oh, how'd that work out?
He was raw. He couldn't wait to jump
on and be like, I knew it. Because
why? Because reports came out that they were
separating. And either he was that willing to
just blindly take at face value the media
he constantly criticizes,
or he knew it was wrong and wanted
to push it for other reasons.
They didn't separate. They didn't have a disconnect.
It's so obvious even at the time,
And he lied about it, or he was
wrong.
In this important report, Jones exclusively reveals the
backstory of what turned Trump against Netanyahu and
why this is so important. And he goes
on in this, oh, I knew. I told
you. I called it. I told you it
was gonna come. Didn't happen, guys. Didn't happen.
Here's another one.
DC insiders confirm indictments of deep state Obama
coup plotters will happen.
Maybe it still will, Maybe. Meanwhile, Democrats go
all in on the hoax that Trump is
establishing martial law. Oh, that one aged well,
didn't it? Seeing as how we're quite literally
under so, like, not even just the ice
over discussion or the,
violations of policy committatus, the deploying of literal
military on the in the streets,
but just,
like, on the surface of this, the Defense
Production Act, and for like, beyond COVID nineteen
being used right now. These are martial law
tactics. But a care but but Obama can
blink hard, that's a martial law, to this
guy.
See? That's just bad. Right? That's just that's
dishonesty.
Plus, Canadian man, fine, whatever else it says.
But so that's where we are. That was
2025.
Here, August 2025. And this is the one
I told you we we would revisit.
Huge DOJ actions incoming. I just had a
long talk with the top,
which was that Obama and the rest are
going down.
Well, I guess that's still coming.
Alright.
I have been talking to a lot of
high level DOJ sources. I'll leave it at
that. I had a long conversation with one
today.
And I was actually authorized
to tell you Big time.
Basically everything they told me except a few
things. But you know what?
I with the notes I wrote, I'm gonna
think about this Yeah.
Before I start putting it out. Yeah. Probably
smart. Because this is big, big,
big information.
And folks know about me and Infowars. I
don't tell you I got something big unless
I got something
very, very big. Yeah. Clearly. You know? Clearly,
that's worked out well.
Well, you know well,
feel free to watch it if you wanna
struggle through whatever he's mumbling there. At the
end of the day, guys,
this was about Obama and Bolton and that's
what that so either, as usual,
he lied for the team or
he was fed lies from the people he
either blindly listens to, even though we know
that's how this work. I can play the
clip for you right now of the CIA
guy back in the seventies telling you, yeah.
That's what we do. We feed him a
couple through true things that we dump him
the false information. It's like so either he
doesn't care or he just falls for it.
I don't know. Because there clearly were indictments,
but what does the the moment they came
out? What was the first thing I told
you? Why? Because I looked at it. Because
I read it.
Because it was pretty clear
they were going nowhere. I looked at the
very first one. I said, well, this is
clearly designed to fail. And that was my
opinion. I'm not an expert on every legal
but what happened? Well, Comey case fell apart
because guess what? There was nothing there. That
and that's not the same as saying he's
not a criminal. Comey should be in jail.
So should James. So should Bolton.
Where are we? Why is Obama in jail
or Bill Gates or Klaus Schwab or all
the Social Security theft or Pelosi or every
other thing we've screamed about?
Do we even need to pretend anymore? Can
we not just be honest about how dumb
this is? Any updates, Alex? I even followed
up to that later and tagged him and
said, what's going on? I thought this everything
was gonna come down.
I said, I anyway, I do think this
is important. It's not just because I enjoy
highlighting how dishonest these people are. It's because
it's obvious that we're being manipulated at the
highest levels of the conversation.
And look.
You think that apply you need to say
you need to apply this exact same level
of skepticism
to me, to anybody, especially the people that
you trust.
Really, you shouldn't blindly trust anybody. You should
be critical. You should consider. You should evaluate.
You should question everything. But the truth is,
guys, I could be wrong. I could be
misled by somebody. For all you know, I've
been lying to you my entire life. It's
not what's happening. But you should question that
because that's the only way to stay,
you know, accurate as best you can, to
be honest. Because at the end of the
day, most of this field is people out
there trying to manipulate you for one reason
or another. I think that's become pretty damn
clear.
So moving forward,
on regard to the the, the naval vessel
conversation,
I wanted you to see this as it
went around yesterday. And I'm I'm not actually
sure which way that you could read this.
You could decide I don't think it's, defined
just yet. But, ultimately, this came out where
there was a video, and this is the
whole deep fake world I'm telling you we're
already in,
which I'm sure most everybody knows that really,
but we just don't see that many examples
where this comes out as apparently a general
from the Indian millet navy admitting,
rather officially confesses
to backstabbing Iran and sharing the location of
the ship with Israel.
Okay. Well, it turns out that at least
by, Twitter and and and other people's investigation
that this is AI, a deep fake. And
even,
Decensored News
did their own breakdown and literally argue they
they argue they proved this based on the
the comp they basically found the original report
and then showed you the original alongside the
fake one. And so, ultimately, what they did
was alter the, and I'll just read you.
He says a doctored video of the Indian
army general
was posted on Twitter yesterday and quickly went
viral. It uses a real interview clip. This
is why you gotta be careful with stuff,
guys. You can't just share things that align
with your views. Even if it looks you
know, even videos. I question these things today.
I I have the AI, or not platform
that I that I pay for because I
wanna be able to check these things and
get something other than Grok, right, or anything
else. And then I go into my own
investigation. We just have to.
And it says it uses a real interview
clip,
but subbed in fake audio to make it
look like he's what he said was that
he gave an exact location. And, also, they
even manipulated the video on the mouth to
make it look like it was correct. That's
the level to this is going to, guys.
So was that
government? Maybe not. I mean, everyone has this
ability mostly today. The governments are probably doing
it in ways we don't even find or
see. That's probably how good it is. But
it's hard to say. You know? Because you
I'm I'll get into what I think how
this might be used. Right? But it says
it was eventually community noted and then later
deleted. Even though despite it was deleted community
noted, tons of people apparently grabbed this, shared
it, and still circulating right now. That's how
this game is played. And it's very and
it's it's so many people are willing to
share anything they like.
So here's the community note. The creator took
real interview and then manipulated it. So, you
know, there's a lot of ways you could
look at this. Right?
One side of it is the location first.
Is I think there's a very real case
to be made there. And not because this
video, but because of the evidence we already
saw. And one of the very real points
that was brought up early was, you know,
was the US government in was were they
speaking with India? Not necessarily Israel, but the
US government, did they give them insight onto
where the ship was in order to help
them track it? That was the most people
argued that's likely the reality. But so now
it comes out to kind of involving Israel.
I almost think this is an effort to
try to muddy the waters about the reality
that we already know happened, which I'll I'll
point out yet again.
E whether or not they were unarmed, which
more reports have come out that are claiming
that it was completely unarmed based on the
practice. But overall, even if it was armed,
it was still a crime. There's no declaration
of war. There's no authorization authorization from congress.
There's no authorization for use military force, and
they did not meet the requirements for the
War Powers Act because Trump himself told you
they attacked first. It was not imminent. That's
the reality, guys. Am I missing something? So
no matter what you wanna point to, what
they're doing is illegal.
Simple. So
this comes out and muddies the waters. Now,
it could be the other side of it.
It could be somebody out there trying to
lie for what they believe is happening, which
happens on all sides, which is one of
this one of these weird sort of, like,
next layer parts of how these propagandized things
have manipulated people. Because look, you have people
that are actually, I argue anyway,
like, honest. I shouldn't say honest, but, you
know, believe they're doing things for the right
reasons
who then lie about this stuff
because they've convinced themselves without fully knowing that
this is what happened. So, therefore, I'll make
this up to make it seem like I
find that less likely because of how much
we see today, but I know that happens
on both sides of the paradigm. So it
just muddies the waters even more. But then
you got people, thirdly, who just do this
to manipulate,
Do it just to see people freak out,
like watching the world burn. Right? All this
exists. But for me,
I think regardless of any of this, the
evidence was already clear. So it's worth knowing
this. And good good to everybody for catching
this. Gotta be careful. That's the real point
here is there
a lot of false stuff going around.
Apparently, there was another video of another building
being burned and bombed, you know, and it
turns out to be fake. There's tons of
this going around right now. So on top
of that, let's remember,
the bigger the the the well, before I
get to the school,
of the of, you know, the the reality
of what happened there I mean, I already
pretty much just made the case about the
the illegality of it. Nothing else is really
disputed. They were there. They they they follow
them, you know, pat off the coast of
Sri Lanka. They bomb them in secret, and
it's a cowardly move. That's not there's nothing
respectable about that. There's nothing honorable about that.
There's nothing even praiseworthy about that, whether it's
strength or otherwise. That's just weak.
Even if there's a declaration of war, at
the very least, you could call it some
kind of a savvy move because you would
expect Iran to be able to be on
guard because that might be the reality. But
based on the current circumstances, there was no
legal reality which that should have happened.
So so the only bad guy in that
scenario was the one that broke the law.
On top of that, it's flushed out even
more about the school. If you can believe
this, you even have Bellingcat,
a very clear asset within this intelligence dynamic,
saying that, yes, it was a Tomok missile
that bombed the Iminab school, which in its
own right should make you question if that's
what happened. I'll just mean that to be,
you know, to realize the dishonesty around this,
but I don't even ultimately, what I mean
is question why they would be saying it,
not necessarily if it's false. Because the evidence
proves this is what happened, and that is
clear today. Because of the missile, because of
the location, because of the fact I mean,
at what level do we just acknowledge that
we know this? That Hegseth himself released the
map which showed you the bombing over the
school, or we have the even Israel saying
that they're the ones that bombed, that it
wasn't us. Guys, we know this. Okay? On
top of the fact that we now have
the imagery that shows that it was Tomahawk,
and now you have Bellingcat. Now I think
the point is is why are they coming
out and saying
it knowing that it's true? Because usually, they're
more the ones trying to lie about, like,
the Assad gassing conversation. Right? Because,
Aaron Mate just ripped them apart showing you
how they were lying.
But I think it's because either this is
important to make a case to kind of
gain some kind of credibility for the larger
lie
or because this is something that Israel through
them wants you to see. Probably that one,
to be honest. But either way, they're now
telling you on top of it that the
American Tomac missiles hit the Iranian girls' primary
school in Minnaab, killing a 175
people, mostly children. And yet you still have
Trump lying about that. Even Hagseth refused to
to say that we knew that, which irritated
Trump.
Here we are, guys. These are these are
monsters. This is something they either did by
accident and lied about it and to to
so far as to blame it on the
other side or that we did did it
on purpose.
My gut tells me this was Israel's decision.
That's not because of some irrational hatred of
Israel. It's because of what they've done their
entire
war history.
You know? And if you don't wanna acknowledge
that, then you're just not being an honest
player on this conversation. Same thing with the
US government, but I think I see it
much more as a as a policy for
Israel than a kind of blind disregard that
I might see from the United States government.
Now here's another example, and I apologize for
the image you can kinda see. I don't
wanna share it, but it's great graphic. One
image contains graphic content of a girl killed
in America's strike on the men of school.
Trump, his war secretary, and their entire administration
are a bunch of pathological liars. Iran doesn't
own Tomahawk missiles.
Here here she is, the again, the one
I showed you. Trump lying about this, saying
it's Iran. Now you could argue he knows
it and lies or because he's being fed
lies but by the ins people around him
who are lying, and we can see it.
But this is what I wanna share. But
you already saw the Tomahawk image shared yesterday.
The the the reality that guys, there's infrared
cameras. They would have evidence if that was
theirs. We know it was. So we know
that they know it was, and they're lying
based on all the evidence.
That's how dumb this gets.
Now in regard to,
the protests in The United States
or elsewhere about
supporting what they're doing in Iran, this has
to do specifically with the school. Grey Zone
had an interesting interview with some people on
the ground. Of course, the simple point is
that they think it was worth it. So,
like, Madeline McCain going 500,000 children were killed.
Do you think it's worth it? Yeah. We
think it's worth it. Now you'll never hear
them make that statement again because that was
it's a historic
you know, that has never left them and
it shows you who they really are.
But now you got them saying the same
thing, that's worth it. 150 girls killed, worth
it. That's what they're actually saying. But for
me, the bigger point is to think about
how all this conversation about paid protesters and
influence manipulation.
And you and we can't and I'm not
I'm not gonna say I would I'm not
gonna be like them and pretend I know
because I don't. These could very well just
be Iranians who I believe are misguided. Maybe
they think maybe they know something I don't,
and I'm wrong. At the end of the
day, though, that we can't consider that this
itself is being,
astroturfed.
That this itself is not honest. That what
we're talking about is a bunch of people
out there fund you know, being driven to
to protest for something
simply because it's a propaganda mission. I mean,
watch for yourself and you tell me this
doesn't ring as a clear possibility.
But you see what you get is people
that assume.
It's they're protesting something I don't I agree
with, so therefore, they must be George Soros
shills. Certainly possible. But if you don't know
that and you're claiming it otherwise, then you're
just as dishonest as everybody else.
So the 150
school girls that were killed, I mean, ultimately,
you see this as worth it. Like, you
Yeah. 100%. 100% is worth it. Yeah. There
was that school in Iran that was bombed
a 150 dead, but you see this all
as worth it. I mean, you think we
should go to the end. Yes. Yes. It's
worth it, and that's why we are here.
We are gonna protest. Even if
it was,
not an, Islamic regime missile,
it was worth it.
Very, very worth it. And sorry. You're you
you you are accusing the IRGC of genocide.
Yeah. They killed around 32,500
people.
It has been, like, two months that we
lost, like, over 50,000 people got killed. In
January, in two days, they massacred
people, 90,000
people. 90,000.
90,000
people, and some people are still in the
prison.
You start to get a little bit of
a, like,
like, feels a little bit unorganic to me.
But, you know, and I'm not gonna say
that's the case. These could just as well
be regular people that just decided to care
about this. Genuinely mean that.
But it's funny how you get these allegations
about people that in most cases you can
see have a very valid reason for, you
know, protesting the murder of US citizens.
It's it's just it's crazy to me. But,
also,
the fact that everyone screams a different lie,
none of that's actually accurate. The reality of
the numbers is far lower even according to
you know, Iran itself has admitted to something
like 3,000. I argue it's probably more than
that. But you can prove, and I mean
prove, that a huge portion of this are
people who are being put. Like, we just
told
you they armed the Kurds and threw them
in there. They admitted they armed protesters.
To pretend like that's not relevant is embarrassing.
But on top of that, I wouldn't be
I'm not ever going to say that it's
outside their own possibility that Iran would then
irrationally shoot protesters because of that fact. And
I wouldn't agree with that. But either way,
it's to understand where we actually are. And
to say that the the numbers, fifty, ninety
thousand is just blatant Israeli propaganda, which is
where it actually came from. I showed you
this on the show.
And some people, they,
take out their eyes, and it's in two
days. You would support, Donald Trump's, for example,
sending troops or sending more air strikes to
Iran. Yeah. Whatever
Trump is
doing, it is helping us. Of course. 100%.
There was also a report today that he
was considering sending troops to Iran, and you
would support that? Yes. I would support that.
Yes. Because I believe he's doing the right
thing. Donald Trump has been looking at more
options,
airstrikes, but also sending troops to Iran, would
you guys be supporting that?
Yes. We will. He's considering,
sending troops in as well. Is that something
you'd support? The actually, that's that's what we
want. Yeah. And I I also see a
lot of Israeli flags here. I mean, this
is also to protect Israel from Iran as
well. Yes. Exactly. Exactly.
Thank you to president Trump and Netanyahu
for standing with people. If you had Donald
Trump's ear right now, you were in the
Oval Office private room, what would you tell
him to do? Please please finish the job.
Just finish it. Whatever it takes.
You you could continue, guys. If you watch
it it's just the same point they make
every time, and this is the point they're
getting at. Does it truly make sense to
you
that Iranian people
would be okay
with the killing of Iranian people
for some next step? Like I said before,
this is like the people protesting the Biden
administration and then being okay that they, in
their own actions, like, killed,
you know, young MAGA children
in order to stop Biden. Does that make
sense to anybody? They'd be like, yeah. Yeah.
It's okay. Kill our people as long as
we get Biden out of the way. That
doesn't make sense.
Now, on top of the fact, there's all
obvious weirdness to the whole thing and the
misinformation flying around and the fact as he's
reporting what you might have already seen,
they're openly discussing
troops, guys. And so this whole pushback about
what Preisner was saying is always how this
goes until later it's we're deploying troops, and
six months later, it turns out they did
it, you know, a month before we even
started talking about Iran. Like, that's how this
tends to go.
And they are discussing this. The people that
were telling you it's all limited strikes. You
know how far we are from that? Days
later,
far, far from that. And so this is
already a global discussion, starting with just a
couple of quick things to push them into
the negotiating table. Like, it's just amazing what
we will absorb today.
As Max says, it was totally worth it.
100%.
Sarah points out to what the Tehran Times
posted
on the front page of the Toronto Times.
Just look at them in the eye, Trump,
and list every single girl that they killed
at
school. Amazing.
You know? The what what people are capable
of ignoring.
Anthony Aguilar,
call to action. I'll include this for you
if you wanna, you know, take,
example from him and and and email them
and call them out. He says, call to
action. Don't let them hide this. CENTCOMS BGM
one zero nine Tomahawk land attack missile strike
on the girls school in Minab,
Iran, and this has also been this has
been reported by people around at the what
was it? It was actually, I believe,
god. Where did that come from? I remember
in the chat yesterday. We just talked about
this yesterday. The the fact that it was
not just a strike on the area, but
a double strike, a double tap, which is
historically what they've done in Yemen, in in
Iraq, plenty of places. And this is coming
from Anthony Aguilar, who is now an activist,
who is a veteran himself. Striking twice with
a $2,500,000
advanced missile
or 2.5
oh, so $5,000,000 total is not an accident.
It's it's careless, negligent, criminal, and war crime.
And he lists off all of their emails,
call them out, email them, do what you
think will make a difference.
Now Israel was accused of using AI
to pick Iran targets
without any human oversight. Sound familiar? Just like
Gaza. This is antiwar.com,
Brett Wilkins.
Israel built AI target systems in Gaza, approved
kills in twenty seconds, 10% error rate. It
was way more than that, by the way,
on top of the fact that I think
some of it was deliberate, obviously.
None of those none now those same systems
are running over Iran.
And there's an arms industry IPOing
off the back of it.
This makes me sick. The profiteering off of
the thing that we all know is illegal.
And I mean, like, inter like, these are
like, it's like the profiting off of the
genocide in Gaza. It's the same point.
They are
wildly profiting as the world sees that they're
committing genocide.
Doesn't that, if anything, show you that we
just don't exist in the dynamic we think
we do? Clearly, no one's doing anything to
stop it.
This
is so important because it is building to
a global problem, if not already there. If
you don't remember,
this is Palantir
working with Israel,
a mass assassination factory inside Israel's calculated bombing
of Gaza. This one was called Habsorah.
The gospel. That's what it means. Then, at
nine seven two magazine as well, Lavender, the
AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza,
one for human targets, one for building, like
larger building targets, both of which, if you
read, will make you sick to your stomach.
How obvious it is. And this is an
Israeli platform speaking with Israeli IDF members who
are literally telling you that they're being driven
to kill as fast as possible, to disregard
the inferno like, to just hit the button,
go with it, go with the AI telling
you, and being pressured to do so, being
graded on how quickly they go.
And knowing that this is being tested, it's
not even fully fleshed out.
And on top of that, the the per
the parameters
being
framed in a way that makes sure you're
killing innocent people.
It's sick. And in in
both of these articles, you have people saying
things like, we're bombing buildings just to bomb
buildings.
These are direct citations from the people on
the ground doing this.
This is the Gaza genocide.
Now it's expanded to ever I mean, look.
Right now, you have to understand one thing
more than anything that it's expanded to Iran,
is that this is already everywhere.
This is Palantir, guys. This is his this
is what we're look at what's happening in
this country right now. You may not think
that's possible.
Look at the way the world has gone.
What we're talking about is Palantir through ICE
and everything else, through Gotham, through,
the three other programs they're using.
They are surveilling everybody in this country. They
are stealing biometrics. Israel has access to all
of it as you can quite literally prove.
This is Peter Thiel's Palantir strategic partnership that
they designed in 2024 in the height of
the genocide that the world was calling out.
They worked with them to allow this to
happen, and now they're working with it for
Iran.
And Peter Thiel might as you know what?
We just showed you that according to Japan
Japanese media, Peter Thiel was called America's shadow
president.
Apparently, Americans can't wrap their minds around that.
Well, I shouldn't say it like that. As
you know, I believe most of us see
it, at least some of these points. But
I think it's interesting that the main conversation
can't grapple with that. Why? Because that conversation
is being controlled by somebody who has an
interest in that not being discussed, in my
opinion.
Trump taps Palantir to compile data on Americans.
Funny how close to home this real conversation
is.
This, I had to add, and we're gonna
get into anthropic to con in in conjunction
with this point. Think about how terrifying this
is, guys. Now this is we've talked about
all the different versions. We have OpenAI.
Right? That's what this one is. Altman. You
got Croc, XAI. You
have, you know, Google element. You got you
got all these different versions of this. And
I think as well I've said many times,
there's a I think there's largely collaboration if
you don't unless
I think business interests are clear. But I
think at the agenda level, these things are
really guiding in the same direction if not
working together. I even showed you OpenAI and
x x
AI, having very clear collaborative points behind the
scenes while acting like they were adversarial.
And maybe they hate each other, but there's
still clearly an agenda there. But Caitlin,
Kalinowski,
who was the,
was she the robotics
lead, I believe? Basic oh, right here.
Building the future fields physical future of
AI. She says, I resigned from OpenAI. This
is on the seventh.
I care deeply about the robotics team and
the work and and work we we built
together.
This wasn't an easy call.
AI has an important role in national security,
she writes.
But surveillance of Americans
without judicial oversight
and lethal autonomy,
without human authorization,
are lines that deserved
more deliberation
than they got.
K. So if you don't understand the way
that sentence reads, it's very clear.
She's resigning
because they deliberated over these apparently far shorter
than she thought they deserved before those decisions
were made,
which is
American surveillance without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy
without human authorization.
That's what we just showed you. That's what
they're doing in Gaza. That's what they're doing
in in Iran. That's what it appears they're
building around you in this country. That's the
control grid we have been screaming about. It's
not even a secret. That's why it's so
frustrating for people to act like it's somehow
undefined.
You you can you can dispute the bigger
way it all ties together as I see
it. But for someone to pretend like this
stuff's not being built, it's just willfully ignorant.
It's partisan driven lies. It's in your face.
This was the she continues. This was about
principle, not people.
Finally, let's get some more principles in the
conversation, guys. I have been I have deep
respect for Sam, she writes, and the team,
and I'm proud of what we built together.
Okay. So the simple point is clear.
They
she feels that that the idea of those
two things didn't get enough deliberation.
Then they got, meaning they went through the
process and that happened, and it's over.
So I'm terrified about what this means even
though I've been seeing it coming. The head
of robotics at OpenAI just resigned stating the
company is building lethal AI weapons with no
authorization required.
Human authorization. This is the control grid we've
been discussing.
How can anybody pretend that they don't see
what's coming, guys? This is the great reset.
It's the same point with a different line,
different angle.
So thinking about this, that it's OpenAI and
they're being forced and driven well, the real
point is, guys, that apparently everybody other than
Anthropic were willing to go absolutely. Elon Musk,
oh, x AI, oh, you want, you know,
surveilling Americans if it's a that's a crime
even though we know it's a crime? Yeah.
Go right ahead. You wanna have murder capabilities
without human authorization?
No problem. Just give us money.
Open, Anthropic, however, was not okay with that,
at least on the surface. He
Hegseth
threatens to force AI firm to share its
tech, escalating the standoff,
basically saying either we're gonna make you a
supply chain risk or
literally through government action force you to reveal
your company's information. I mean, either one of
those things should have been like, oh my
god. This shows exactly what this comp what
this government is.
Either way, from groups talking about
democracy and and, you know, free market. I
mean, it's just insane
how clearly I mean, actually, this is worth
bringing up again.
The cat the Catherine Austin Fitts
argues
that Donald Trump is the most anti capitalist
president in history.
Now the image tends to rub people the
wrong way. I just I thought it was
very perfect for the point.
Reverse Robinhood. Why Trump has become anti capitalist,
or why has he? Or
yeah. So the point though is discuss, you
know, things like the TikTok or or or
Nvidia or or any number of examples where
there's a clear merging of corporation with government.
That's fascism. You can even oh, you can
talk about socialism and communism. The point is
clear, though. It's a the ignoring it when
it comes to your team.
And this is nothing but, guys. This is
over the top. So the way this developed
is I'm sure you've already seen, because this
is from February 24.
Include this for you real quick.
And this is what crystal ball to say
about the Pentagon threatening to either cut ties
or and declare them a supply chain risk
or invoke the Defense Production Act.
See what I'm telling you? To force them.
So that's what that's martial law. Right? That's
the production martial law. It's what they use
during COVID. It's what they're already border law.
Actually, in fact, it's what they're using now
for certain things already. He simply said because
it's active, apparently, because it these things never
go away. They never give back power. I'm
gonna use it to invo to basically force
you to reveal your company's inside information, which
apparently would lose them lots of money, but
that's okay because we don't care. Because we're
powerful, we can do what we want. Anthropic's
red lines are no mass surveillance and no
autonomous killer robots.
It should be terrifying to everybody that the
Pentagon finds these safeguards to be outrageous.
I don't know how we don't see that
as clear as day. I mean, everybody.
Now Corey, Corinne points out The US just
accidentally admitted two things. And I think this
is already self evident, but in case you
haven't put it together.
One, that AI is monitoring Americans. And two,
that AI is for building autonomous weapons.
Right? I mean, otherwise, why would they be
so adamant about needing this and threatening action
if they didn't allow that?
Pretty damn clear. Anthropic said, we won't help
with that. Washington reacted like someone exposed their
entire playbook.
I think that's pretty perfect. The way, like,
the way they frame that is obvious.
Here's here's what HEGSAT said. This weekend, Tropic
delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal,
as well as a textbook case of how
not to do business with the United States
government. Well, I I I thought it was
their choice to do business. Right? Right? Free
market? Heck, that's right. Capitalism.
Right? Right? No. No. No. Sorry. Sorry. Capital
no. We're forcing them to do business with
the government because that's capitalism.
I mean, come on, guys. It's just bad.
There's so many
student electionables out there who know better, who
lie because they're not honest people, because they're
part of the team, and somehow argue that
maybe this feels like the thing I've always
fought against, but it's because I know they
don't mean it, and will later go back,
you're a child, or you're dishonest.
Our position has never wavered, never will. The
Department of War must have full unrestricted access
to Anthropic. Why do you feel like that's
your right?
What if they just don't wanna work with
you? Isn't that their right? I mean, this
is just wild to me. And, again, simply
point, it comes down to the fact that
they required
killing with no no no human authorization and
surveillance without law.
That's I mean, it's that point alone shows
you what this government is, not this administration,
this government.
Now on the March 1, Trump banned Anthropic.
You're banned. Supply chain risk. And then, oopsie,
hour later, used them to strike Iran,
which I think even further
perfectly makes the point of what these people
are.
Not just that they have no scruples or
integrity. Right? Not that they're they're willing to
force you to do what they want.
Law doesn't matter. But literally, that they don't
even care about the things they claim they're
trying to stop. Like, that's just sad.
They have nothing that guides them.
Every day, they show you who they are.
Now, and this is as of the ninth
today, Anthropic sues Trump administration seeking to undo
supply chain risk designation.
I mean, it's amazing to me that they
haven't, at least not that I've seen, called
out the fact that they're using it right
now to murder children. That was point of
the point. People argue that this was part
of what happened with the bombing of the
child's school.
I just think this is wild, guys.
Now, on top of that, as Daniel Horowitz
pointed out, red states, oh, did they really
delete this? I can't believe it. God, it's
this platform. People on this are so dishonest.
Nope. Look at that. See? Now it's the
platform that's honest. You see how that always
works? Now I always point this out. Had
he not literally posted the link,
as opposed to just, like, share you you
share it, and it brings the the window
in, and you then you post. Right? You
wouldn't be able to see that. Twitter would
be effectively hiding this from you. Is because
it looks like it's not there. Right? Except
the link is there, which is often why
I'll include the link in the middle of
my text to make sure it doesn't get
moo, like, hidden.
Because there it is. You know why I
think they're trying to hide this that's almost
at a million views? Because people are being
arrested,
Republicans, for speaking out against AI data centers.
That's what this is.
And as he says,
re I'll actually include this, make sure they
don't hide it from the people who wanna
look at the links.
Oops.
Oh,
okay. Now it shows up. How perfect is
that? Anyway, people are being arrested for speaking
out. Red states arresting their own people for
speaking up against the agenda twenty thirty land
grab for chat bar chat bot. I mean,
every single time.
It's obvious what they're doing, and the team
sport players who are, in fact, the ones
being screwed over,
I guess, are too happy winning to call
out the fact that they're losing.
Lowkey also points out, Elon Musk's company SpaceX
launched satellites for Israeli intelligence companies
ImageSat International.
ImageSat International uses those satellites for targeting acquisition
and Israeli Air Force for bombings on Iran.
It never stops
every time.
In case you missed it, guys, SpaceX, Starlink,
these are just more more tools of war.
That's what they are under the guise of
humanitarianism.
It's what it is.
So if you wonder why it's happening in
every field of war, that's why. It's always
been. He's a defense contractor. He's worked with
the the deep state pedophiles under Biden, and
he's worked with the war Nazi fascist whatever,
you know, whatever the extreme version of each
side are. He's worked with all of them.
And, apparently, each side he's on the team.
I just it's stupid. The truth is, guys,
this has always been building around you, and
now they're deploying it as they're killing children
in Iran, and it's okay.
According to them, anyway.
Now getting into the,
what the what this section was
oh, I get some sentiments about the partisanship,
but I just, you know, I added a
bunch of things today, and some of this
might be slightly out of, like, location.
But
antiwar.com reported on the eighth. State department bypasses
Congress to send more than 20,000 bombs. Now
we already told you this yesterday. $151,000,000
on top of everything else that Rubio
pretended was an emergency. I'm not really sure
why because they're the ones that started this.
You know, it's just so dishonest in order
to bypass congress.
But, you know, hashtag freedom or whatever. State
department, 20,000 bombs to Israel while there could
be a genocide to continue to bomb in
Iran during an illegal war. It all works
out. Right?
Everyone's calling this out. Your government doesn't care
that you see it, guys, because I don't
think they're in charge.
I thought, oh, there's the post. Rubio
bypassing congress.
Now I wanna include this under money being
spent. In case you missed this, I thought
was insane. So much I'd love to talk
about that relates to the ICE conversation, but
there's just so much here to talk about.
We'll go back to it. It's still happening.
They're still doing the what they're doing across
the country. In fact, in most of these
other conversations, it's getting worse because they know
we're not looking.
It cost a combined
$53,000,000.
$53,000,000
to detain
708
migrants at Guantanamo
in 2025.
That's 74,000,
almost $75,000
per person
for an average of fourteen days.
As Melanie points out, the Trump administration
spent $53,000,000
to detain less than 750
people for no reason other than Trump thought
it sounded tough to send random migrants to
Gitmo. Because if you look at the details,
these are not some especially dangerous people. So
the he just wanted to make a a
performative theater point to say we're sending the
bad guys to Guantanamo and made you spend
$53,000,000
for no discernible reason. They could have gone
to any other holding cell.
It's time that we start being real about
what's actually happening in this country, guys, because
it's getting worse every day.
Now as Thomas Malay Malinin points out,
I think there's more of this happening everywhere
I see. Like, I mean, every day gets
more and more and more, guys. People close
to me as I keep pointing out. He
says, I wanna apologize to the world.
While I did vote for Donald Trump, naturally
oh, so oh, he says, well, I did
not vote for Donald Trump. Naturally, I did
champion him fiercely, also here.
I now consider this to have been my
worst mistake of my life. I simply thought
he that he would be much bigger man
than he actually is. There were some grounds
for my mistake, though.
The in house analysis,
one of our partners at the whatever his
platform is, GNS and Economics, conducted after the
first election victory of Donald Trump, found him
to be a radical
but peace loving and rough businessman whose main
aim was to secure the well-being of The
United States, his family, and this world. Well,
that's what you get for listening to economic
analysis, which seems to be wrong all the
time. Upon considering Donald Trump's second term, I
mistakenly assumed that, a, he would remain this
prime mental clarity, which he I don't think
that was the case before anyway, b, that
he would be willing to disclose his past
actions, and, c, he would genuinely pursue his
promises of peace and withdrawal of American withdrawal
of American influence. I wrongfully assumed that he
would want to become a president to save
both The US and the world. I was
wrong.
So he gets into what happened and clearly
it's about Israel and and what and we
all see it, guys. But I want you
to understand how many people are out there
screaming about this. A 100,000 followers.
People I mean, it's not just the big
ones, like,
Tucker or Smith or other. They people are
fleeing from this.
But some of them, of course, and this
is what I want you to focus on
because it's quite obvious that there's things that,
like, I mean, what they were prom look.
We're they're literally at war with Ron right
now. They literally have a Stargate program. They
pulled back from the food dyes. They make
glyphosate a national I mean, guys, they lied
to you. Okay? It's so painfully clear right
now. Anybody honest is pointing that out. At
the very least, that they don't have a
choice or however you wanna rationalize it. This
is not what was promised. And that's every
administration I've ever seen, by the way. But
when you get to this point and you
get the people like this that suddenly start
telling you they're gaslighting you, this is what
was always coming. We should support this because
s, y, and z. Even though they right
before, we're telling you that this would never
be okay. These are the people you just
need to make note of because they're not
honest, or at the very least, they don't
have principles.
They're guided by personal interest or whatever else
it is. Pino Americano says, I'm telling you
right now, when gas prices spike again, like
right now, and the Democrats start with, oh,
well, you know, there's a war going on
in Iran,
cut them off mid sentence and state very
clearly, quit making war.
Dip s h I t's.
Oh, that's interesting.
2025
2026. Excuse me. March 7. He says, I
will have no issue
excuse me.
Caught me off guard. I will have no
issue paying $1 more per gallon of gas
to end forty seven years of Iranian regime.
See how we're talking point.
Forty seven years? God, these people are stupid
if they actually believe that. But, again, I
don't think these people believe anything. It's about
team support.
Don't count or signal the leader. That's a
small contribution for freedom for freedom. How's that
working out? Freedom for Iraq, from Syria, for
Libya. How's that working out for the freedom
we're spreading around the world? These people don't
even care.
Even Twitter called them out.
Previously said this wouldn't happen. You know? Whatever.
It's just constant.
This this is you does good job of
calling these people out.
Lauren, Witsky says this was Graham Allen's position
on war with Iran just a few months
ago. MAGA influencers are so bizarre to me.
She says, they will betray themselves and their
own convictions at the drop of a hat.
And for what? Now, again, I don't believe
that's just every MAGA influencer. I believe that's
the people pretending
to believe in MAGA. I believe the real
MAGA influencers are the people out there who
believe they wanna make the country great again,
not just whatever Trump says that is or
says MAGA's me. That should be immediately the
real people go, woah. Okay. Then I then
I met I misinterpreted what you were doing.
The truth is there's tons of those people.
I believe that's the majority. Same with people
who believe they wanna make America healthy again.
What they're doing in that administrative part of
that is lying about it. That doesn't make
everybody who wanted those things earnestly
dishonest.
But I agree with what she's pointing out,
these high level Bennie Johnson types. They'll betray
themselves and their own convictions on a drop
of a hat. I don't think that that
she says, I don't even think that
this Zogbot is getting paid. Graham Allen. Israel
can handle its own business, and good on
them for doing so. It has nothing to
do with The USA. No war with Iran.
All capitals. They ran on this like a
central part of this. In fact, as
weird as,
Vance has just vanished into the bushes like
Homer Smith, he's, you know, clearly because he
was running on, don't want war with Iran?
Vote for Trump. And here we are. Right?
We have foreign invaders on our own soil
that must be dealt with. That's the immigration
conversation. America first, he says. Okay. Well, here
he is in the fourth. Dems attempt to
stop president Trump's Operation Epic Fury has failed.
F around and find out in full force.
They're just they're just children. It's juvenile.
Here,
parody Jeff points out, polls in The US
now magically show 90% of Americans backing presidents'
war.
Is this a joke?
That's what they're doing. 90%?
I mean, guys, this is like like I
said. Well, they also told us Clinton was
a lock to win. Remember that? When we
reali when will we realize that these are
just tools
used to manipulate opinion? That's what they're for.
Now they have a purpose, as I've always
said. In some cases, they can even give
you a level of insight,
but they can clearly be manipulated and always
seem to be. Since this is objectively the
opposite of what we can see,
I think it's obvious. So let's talk about
this for a second in regard to the
influence around this lie and why Trump seems
to buy it. Here, Janice Girl points out,
Trump, I agree with this, is insulated by
people who show him an alternative reality, such
as polling that's 90%.
Now it's obviously embarrassing to think that he
just takes that at face value, but isn't
that what everyone else is doing? Maybe that's
more accurate than we realized that he's like
everybody else and he's also being played. I've
thought that since the beginning is a very
real possibility.
Like I said, though, there's plenty of examples
of his own actions
that are that demonstrate who he really is.
But
Loomer, of course, how in the world anybody
make sense of this monster ever be like,
it's not just that she's a monster. She's
also really stupid and is very, very childish
and and in, like, takes that are based
on subjective
assumption every day. Why would he listen to
her?
Israel is why she's supported, I think.
I also told him who that everyone loves
him in America and changed terrorism and Tucker's
bad. That's what she did. And remember, after
she met with him, he called out Tucker
and Megan Gallus is crazy. So So here's
what Tucker had to say. On March 6,
it was posted. I'm not sure exactly when
the recording was from, but it's clearly in
regard to this Iran conversation. And here's what
he had to say, that he went and
tried to stop him from doing this three
times.
They said,
I flipped to DC three times in the
last month to try to convince Trump not
to do this. It didn't work. It happens.
I'm looking at this.
You know?
Say short.
This is not gonna get better. So then
I think
I'll better. So then I think
I'll fly up again and ask him. I
mean, I I don't know if anyone else
is doing it, so I'm gonna try,
to just declare victory and go home. Like,
you killed an 86 year old cleric. Let's
just call that a win and and then
pull back.
And so then, meantime, he he got convinced
to denounce me.
K.
I I don't care. I'm a fly up
anyway and see him. Right? Even though he's,
like, denouncing me. So I call over there
to see you know, call someone who knows
him to see I said, I'm just gonna
fly up anyway and and tell him this
because I think it's so important. And the
person says, don't bother
because
he's being shown polling
that this war is like a ninety ten
win for him.
And I said, I don't know where that
polling is coming from. It's like, I you
know, I guess you can make any kind
of poll, and it's he's watching Fox News,
which is telling him the same thing, and
he's getting
fake polling. I guess they're only polling Sean
Hannity's viewers or something.
And so I do not sure that there's
a sense as if this was yesterday because
I was getting so agitated and worried.
Very quickly.
I really think it's, like let's think about
this as we go forward in the in
the big conversation we're always having. Right? As
always, we should hope for whatever reason, no
matter how dishonest he might have been in
the past, that some suddenly, he's actually trying
to do the right thing. Why wouldn't we
hope for that? While we if we're always
doing the the mindset that we question him
regardless, which we should, then it's not about
trusting or not. Right? So we can consider
then hope and whatever else, like Massey or
anybody else. My point in saying that is
that it's interesting to see this this deviation.
Right? The, the the shift where, you know,
denouncing him and and, you know, we should
genuinely consider whether this is sort of the
COVID point, whether this is him distancing from
the problem to gain clout for the next
lie or whatever. There's very real reasons to
consider that this is something others, CIA, whatever
else. People make allegations.
But all of that aside,
much of what you can't necessarily prove,
what he's saying
right now more than I ever, I agree
with.
And, well, and I I as usual, you'll
see me add things and point out where
I feel like he's pulling a punch. Right?
And that's that's important, but that doesn't always
amount to doing it for a larger reason.
Either way, question all sides of it. The
reason I'm saying it is because what he's
saying right here is a like, I don't
see how this fits into the larger lie
because you could do it you could pull
away and deny and, like, push back on
the team in much
lighter ways that wouldn't be so damning for
the agenda. Right? So I don't know. I'm
just I I genuinely hope that. And, like,
like, over the politician, I probably will never
ever be like, I probably I don't think
I will forever anybody ever other than maybe
family. Will I pretend that I just know
this person's always on my side or always
telling the truth? That's just naive. We should
never do that. But don't you see what
I'm saying, though? Like, it's an interesting turn,
and I'm just hoping that things are changing
enough that some of these random people out
there that have always been, you know, playing
the partisan game suddenly start to realize the
bigger picture like a Charlie Kirk point. Whether
that was the case or not, I wonder
that today. I wonder whether or not he
finally started to see the Zionism problem through
the Israel conversation and saw the difference.
So still supported Israel, but recognized what Zionism
was doing. That's an important thing to think
about because I think that's what describes everything
that happened.
Thing, and he's getting
fake polling. I guess they're only polling Sean
Hannity's viewers or something. Yeah. And so I
am not sure that there's a sense as
if this was yesterday because I was getting
so agitated and worried.
I don't think that there's a sense that
this is unpopular.
Like, I think Oh, yeah. There's an information
vacuum here.
There's a massive information vacuum. And, you know,
for the president and the administration
who declared victory based on Internet and vibes
and podcasts,
Let's take a survey, shall we, of every
podcast that he appeared on, and how do
they feel about the Iran conflict? You can
you can look very clearly for yourself. You
can look at a lot of the polling
of that same demographic, which they were very
excited about. Young men in particular, how are
they feeling about this conflict? And, you know,
if you were saying 9010, it's not even
true in the Republican sense. I mean, the
latest one that I saw was, like, 72%
Republicans, which by the way, mister president and
everybody in the administration, Bush had 93 for
Iraq. And how did that turn out for
him? So let's not put, you know, put
all of our eggs in the I still
argue that also wasn't true.
Now, like I said, though, I I I
think that more than I've ever seen in
my life, there was a clear momentum right
there, even if it was a illusory.
Like, in the sense of, like, maybe having,
like, a strong 30% and then just making
it look like it was 70 or 90%.
But I there was momentum. Like, we all
felt it. There was crazy. People that were
rationally hating every Muslim that was like, just
go over there and take it all over.
Destroy it all. Nuke it all. It was
crazy. You know? That itself, though, I think
is part of what we're dealing with today.
It's just more seen today. It was a
propaganda push. But the question is whether, you
know, well, I think support today has never
been lower.
I just I just saying I doubt that
93 even then.
Basket of just because Republican voters are here,
that this is all going to be like
sunshine and roses. And I also would not
make the spurious claim that it's all about
Iran. It's about compounding effects. The gas price
effect of the Iran conflict is going to
be dramatically more important to the White House's
political chances in the midterms than anything that's
actually happening on the ground. I don't think
it should be that way, but that's reality.
And I do think also, you know, your
your your,
your inclination to get him to try and
declare victory, That's the correct move from a
strategic perspective, an economic perspective, from every and
I also would not make the spurious claim
that it's all about Iran. It's about compounding
effects. The gas price effect of the Iran
conflict is going to be dramatically more important
to the White House's political chances in the
midterms
than anything that's actually happening on the ground.
I don't think it should be that way,
but that's reality. And I do think also,
you know, your your your,
your inclination to get him to try and
declare victory, that's the correct move from a
strategic perspective and economic perspective, from every political
perspective.
You don't want the entire country's national discourse
focused on Iran. I'll give you a good
example. Just yesterday, the white house did a,
summit where they were trying to address rising
electricity prices on data centers. In another world,
no Iran, that's a main topic of conversation
on my show, a major topic, maybe one
of yours interests as well. But in the
middle of rumor and peace and death and
everything that's happening, the amount of coverage that
got is zero. The president just gave his
state of the union. He had a lot
of things in that state of the union,
Iran. What it didn't come until the seventieth
minute. I think. What was the rest of
it about? The economy, about gas prices,
about jobs, mister president and others? Like, that's
what people really vote on.
I and I think the point the same
is that think about all the things that
are being deliberately buried
and and being done by Israel, especially, but
by the US government because of that.
Now Janice Gurl also points out,
01/24/2025,
and I've I've I've given you some other
examples of this already. Fanatic Christian Zionist. He's
a religious Zionist. Pete Hegseth and said Zionism
and Americanism are the front lines of Western
civilization. I've actually played that for you in
the past.
02/28/2026.
He, according to their reporting, convinced Trump to
start a war with Iran and had US
comrades across commander, excuse me, across 30 military
bases,
tell troops Iran's war is part of God's
plan. Now the the part that I can't
verify is whether or not he convinced Trump
to do it.
But but but everything else is something that
I can verify. The reality of what was
said, it's I just showed you the reporting
coming directly from the military. Like, there hundreds
of people are,
I mean, alarmed about them stating that this
is a religious war. I can't believe like
you just said, I can't believe that in
and of itself is not a, like,
all Capitol Washington Post headline or whatever. And
I know why they're not gonna do it,
because they're not really wanting to do that.
Those people are on the team at the
end of the day when it comes to
the real agenda as far as I can
tell, in a broad sense, like the the
people who run the paper. But at the
end of the day because I always point
out there are people that, you know, write,
that, you know, don't realize they're they're working
through like, like, an Alison Morrow point. Right?
Or manufacturing consent that they wouldn't be there
if they didn't already hold certain beliefs. Most
of them don't even realize, like, the corp
current major roles are to me, I think.
But the point, guys, and she has a
good clip down here breaking down the eighth
front war,
is that this is somebody who's been on
the record telling you that this is about
religious Zion. This is about the end times.
And now he's telling your military that that's
what's happening, and we're just not talking about
it.
Max Blumenthal points out according to the Israel,
Times of Israel.
Matt, this actually,
you know, I forgot to grab that. This
I was just reading this earlier today.
I'll get I'll I'll try to remember to
put it in the show notes so you
guys can read it. It was more of
a passing point since we've already discussed it.
I always find it interesting how Israel jumps
ahead and tries to point out what makes
them look, I think, what's happening, that they're
controlling what's going on, but how it makes
Trump look bad or Biden, whoever else, and
they never do anything about it. I think
that makes the point for itself. Trump tells
Israeli media that he will not end the
war on Iran without Israeli consent.
He bow he also boasts that we've destroyed
a country that wanted to destroy Israel.
So the US presidency proudly admits he's authorized
destroying a country of 90,000,000 for Israel. Now
the point in this is that Israel framed
this as essentially
that Israel decide decides the point, but Trump
and his team frame this as it's a
mutual war for freedom.
See how funny the difference is? Whereas Israel's
framing is sort of like, well, it's up
to us. And Trump has to you know,
we have we decide and he promised to
follow our lead.
And that, yeah, he probably sees that. And
you know how much Trump thinks about things
like that, and yet we don't ever hear
that get called out.
Now in regard to the continuation of of
the,
the leadership in the leader, rulership, whatever you
wanna call any government in Iran,
It's interesting the direction it's taken, and I
think it speaks to quite a few things
of way they've dealt with all of this.
Now this is from antiwar.com.
Iran chooses Ayatollah Khomeini's son as a new
leader.
The younger Khomeini is 56 years old, and
he is said to have close ties with
the IRGC.
He is taking power following the killing of
not only his father,
his wife,
his mother,
and his sister,
and an Israeli airstrike on one of the
opening attacks on the US Israeli war, you
know, on on the office building where they
were civilians, like I told you, above ground.
I think it's really worth thinking about this.
Now you could he could be a monster
for all we know.
But it's worth noting that you're talking about
somebody who was taking power
in in a not a small country, not
a weak country, in a country that's pretty
well positioned, I argue, to stand against what's
happening. And and he is now driven by
the fact that these people killed his family,
His wife, and his mother, and his sister.
You know? I mean, so if this does
get to a place where it gets extremely,
like, what they always claim what do you
what do you think drove this into reality,
guys? Do you not call that terrorism? Is
it suddenly okay because you claimed that guy
was bad?
Why would their family be the target you
know and this is always the case and
it's it's everywhere you've ever seen Israel the
US government involved in war. At least in
in living memory from what I've been covering
this.
The choosing of Khamenei is seen as a
defiant move in the faces of US pressure
as president Trump has said, because democracy, right,
that he would not accept anybody,
accept this person for a replacement for his
father. Trump has said he must have to
say in who Iran's next leader is, You
know, because voting and democracy, obviously, guys, and
has demanded the Islamic Republic
unconditionally surrender.
And that's a sign that the war will
totally not end anytime soon.
I mean, how do you declare
unconditional surrender and then pretend it's gonna be
over in a few weeks? Because you're trying
to project strength and that actually shows weakness
when you understand the reality of what's actually
happening.
Iranian officials have also maintained that they do
not seek a ceasefire
and are ready to continue fighting The United
States. The killing of a senate of a
the senior Khomeini hasn't stopped the Iranian military
response, and there's been no sign that the
government is close to collapsing or that any
kind of uprising will start inside the country.
Now, you don't have to take anti war
anti wars,
opinion on that. Check it for yourself. Either
I respect them immensely, and I think they're
absolutely correct and they think the facts prove
that.
Just because they claim otherwise and share, you
know, they share fake images on Twitter that
get shown in fact checks, you know, we
just pretend like we know. It's, oh, they
love them over there. It's not what's happening,
guys. It's just not. And I've said that
as long as I've ever been doing this.
There there are plenty of factions that are
very unhappy with their government to run, just
like in this country.
But if you actually listen to the group
they claim they're doing this for, they don't
want people from the outside involved. That's why
the unions who supported it in the beginning
pulled back when they saw the foreign actors
very publicly and said, this is foreign actors.
As I understand it, one of the most
influential clerics in the world
recently just stood up and called all of
this a I think it was a faqboi,
basically just said that this is something that
everyone in the Islamic community in the world
needs to stand against. And that's not necessarily
a violent way. That's this is a, like,
a religious leader in the sense of saying,
like, a, you know, from a, like, this
is a term they use, and I'm just
blanking on it. But that that suits the
purposes.
Saying that it's something we need to stand
against from a religious perspective.
It's also because it's just wrong and illegal
and and criminal. You know, the it's not
like, it's I I watch as already you're
gonna see MAGA people saying because he said
that, therefore, we know it's gonna be terrorism
because in their minds, Muslim equals terrorism. And
it shows you how stupid this conversation is.
But overall,
what we're talking about being driven into this,
Netanyahu and and the forced effort of, you
know, the coercion of getting him to react
into this, it's the same point here.
Where was it that,
oh, you know what? I think it was
something I'm thinking. I just lost my point.
But, you know, the the general point in
all of this is that they have influence
over who gets picked. It's like it's like
with Hamas and Gaza or the crown prince
of Iran. You know, it's the same kind
of idea that none of that represents is
Iranian's interest, what they want, or that they're
even involved in the process, but yet they
always scream about democracy.
It's just insulting, isn't it? They know what
they're doing.
Now US intelligence report says large scale war
unlikely
to achieve regime change. They know
that. This is all about getting The US
to do the to do the work. The
US government, US personnel, like every other war
that we've been involved in in the war
on terror. It's been for Israel,
as anybody honest is pointing out today. And
he wrote a book about it. Here we
are, yet again,
and I guess it's about using us as
a battering ram. I maybe to it to
speed up the collapse of the West. I
don't know. That's what religious Zionism thinks. End
of the day,
their own US intelligence, like The US intelligence
that also said they're not seeking a nuclear
bomb, that I guess they ignore because Israel
said, is telling Trump,
doing what you're doing is not going to
lead to regime change, and they don't care.
Maybe because he's being insulated by only Israeli
Loomer information. I don't know. But the truth
is their own
intelligence says this is the wrong move.
Also, in antiwar.com,
Trump has expressed serious interest in sending troops
into Iran. Also widely reported. He said it
himself.
It's just funny to go, you know, didn't
Luna, like, ten seconds ago tell you that's
not even impossible? That's never going to happen?
It was always again, I argue this was
happening before it was even discussed.
My opinion. But now we've got the Preisner
edition where they said people are saying themselves
they're being deployed. We now have them flirting
with the idea of being deployed. They're already
funding and arming protesters. They're already funding and
arming the Kurds. What are we really talking
about? It's a it's a small deviation from
what they're already doing. This is already happening.
I believe there are already US boots on
the ground. I'm not sure if I'm correct
on that. It's my opinion, but I guess
we'll find out. But he's talking about it
either way, guys. So let's get past this
lie of some limited operation. They knew what
was going on. They knew this with Iraq.
They knew it now. They knew it with
Vietnam. They knew with every other situation we've
ever been involved in. I gotta stop being
so hyperbolic. But the truth is, it's pretty
ubiquitous.
Comrade Misty points out oh, this this was
just I should've had this next to the
other one. Same point. Trump tells Israeli media
that he will not end the war without
his real consent.
And and Misty says, but but I was
told he wanted to liberate the Iranian people.
I was told that he really cares about
Iranian women.
Seriously, if you ever bought any of that,
ball your finger into your fist and punch
yourself in the face.
I mean, really, though. It's like what you
you are the most gullible person in the
world if you continue to follow-up for the
same lie from the same dishonest person
or or group, government.
Now Melanie de Arrigio points out what the
Wall Street Journal wrote. Trump's sons back new
drone company test targeting Pentagon sales. Now this
is one one sliver of a gigantic pie
of investments and and overlapping agreements that give
the Trump family
tons
of money because of what they're involved in.
And war is a huge part of that.
But the AI direction?
Crypto?
I mean, you're not blind. You all see
it. And for crying out loud, he's hawking
watches
while he's president
in his own advertisement. I mean, this is
just ridiculous, guys. So the the main point
is that this is going to profit them
or they'll profit from it. Excuse me. Reminder,
as Trump starts war,
sells weapons and bombs everyone, the Trump family
has a military drone company with military contracts
currently vying to meet Pentagon demand for the
Trump administration
that recently banned new Chinese drones.
Where do you think they're gonna get the
orders from? The most corrupt family ever is
profiting from all the death and destruction Trump
is responsible for.
Now
the kind of ongoing reality of Iran, I
think it's important to think about the bombings
and and, you know, what's actually happening on
the ground. One thing I want you to
consider,
it's an extension of the same kind of
just lie about how this was really gonna
go.
As of the seventh, Trump says the map
of Iran will probably look not will probably
not look the same afterward.
This is the same people who just told
you that they don't wanna be involved. We
don't wanna rebuild Iran. We're just trying to
save the Iranian people. Well, that was obviously
a lie, and everyone knew that. But here
we are with a now, you know, mission
creep twenty seconds later. Well, we have to
redesign the map, obviously. The balkanization of everything,
that's the same thing they're doing everywhere else.
This is designed you you can't do that
without occupation, guys. So if you're gonna change
the way the map looks, that means you're
dictating new discussions of where borders are. Yeah.
We're back to square one. This is the
same thing. Oh, guess what, though? Well, actually,
that's a perfect way to say it. Square
1. This is the beginning point. This is
actually, this is the end point of where
the war on terror was supposed to go.
Now, they're just swinging back around and trying
to accomplish it. This was always the plan.
So when Trump tells you that it's a
limited operation, he's lying. When Lindsey Graham tells
you don't wanna be involved in the endpoint,
they're lying. It's always been this.
Just like with Gaza. Same point.
US and Israel are discussing sending special forces
into Iran
to seize its stockpile of a rear. So
here we are where they're trying to create
the justification
for what they told you would never happen.
And this is how it works with the
partisans.
Well, what do you expect them to do?
They found your rich uranium. They have to
go in. I know. I don't want war
either, but just freedom. You know? It happens,
guys, and people fall for it and or
they're just dishonest. The reality is,
first of all, they're not seeking nuclear weapons
according to our own intelligence, according to the
people that tell you they're invest, the International
Atomic Energy Agency, and everybody else was standing
other than Israel United States and their blockies.
But on top of that,
they have in uranium 60%,
460 kilograms that Witkoff tried to pretend was
a problem even though the IAEA
quite literally said in the 2025
that that exact amount was well within their
safeguards. I just showed you yesterday.
So he's lying to you, and that's why
the rest of the diplomats called out Whitcough
as being the one lying about the process.
But the reality is that that was within
their safeguards, and Whitcough just brazenly lied about
how they're bragging about it. She's lying, guys.
It's provable.
So they have this. So what they're gonna
say is we need to go in and
take it. It's a justification to get you
to call for the very thing they promised
would never happen, an invasion of Iran, which,
by the way, will be led
probably alone. I I shouldn't say led, but
probably be done alone by US soldiers
or anybody else with some kind of, you
know, coalition, but it probably won't involve Israeli
soldiers.
Details include Iran currently holds 450
kilograms of 60 enriched. You see my point?
I mean, I'm it's just infuriating, guys,
that we have to pretend like these people
have any kind of honesty or standing in
the conversation.
So this is being roundly reported. Why? Because
Witkoff screamed that lie on Fox News. So
here we are yet again
showing you what the IAEA,
in fact, the director general.
In case you understand this, this is the
group that they would tell you to look.
This is the group they would use to
go verify what they're saying.
Right? To be sure they're not doing what
they claim. That's Israel and The United States.
So
for the third time,
as stated in my most recent report,
based on inspections conducted at the relevant facilities
since then,
Iran's uranium stockpiles
remain under safeguards
in accordance
with their comprehensive safeguard agreement. You can't get
more clear than that.
They're not breaking the rules.
You may recall, it says that more than
400, that's four sixty five they're talking about,
of this stockpile is enriched to 60%.
That's this is simple,
meaning it's within the safeguards. So when Witkoff
and everybody else scream this lie, they're playing
you,
or they're being played, which is probably just
as likely. I don't think Witkoff or Trump
or any of them actually know what they're
talking about.
Not really. Not when it comes to these
kind of things. Or, I mean, it could
be both.
I just see that often where I think
they're being played. My point is that I
mean, I I would argue or take it
back. I'd probably argue I mean, if they're
not ridiculous. They have some kind of insight
to what they're negotiating, but who knows how
crazy incompetent they are today. So that means
they're lying then because there's no air in
this conversation.
That right there, what they're claiming they need
to invade to grab
is currently within the safeguards according to their
agreement.
That's insane to me.
In fact,
let me write this down real quick.
Maybe we can get this clipped out right
here. There's this little break, this one. And
have everybody out there watching, break that down
right there. Those two things. Get that one
point out there. Put it on Twitter. I'll
tag it. Or you tag me, I'll share
it. I'm gonna get Jason do it too.
23655.
Because
it needs to be forced into the conversation
that these people are so brazenly lying to
you.
So is it possible that even that they're
lying? Yes. Of course. But it's not about
the unknown possibility. It's about what the evidence
shows. And right now, the evidence across the
board shows that they're lying to you and
that this is the reality, that Gabbard told
you, that the previous administration told you, that
everybody involved has already told you it's not
the reality.
So I'll include this yet again and it'll
probably still get missed.
So considering that the the pushing justification to
invade Iran did you see that just happened
right there? So stupid. Oh my god.
Okay. Hold on a second. I can find
this.
I didn't grab the screenshot of it because
it was pretty much the entire article, but
I forgot that Daily Mail does this.
If you don't know what it does, look,
it doesn't even give you an option to
scroll back and forth. Daily Mail just reverts
to this weird homepage and and just no
matter what. If you leave it up for
longer than, like, an hour, it just diverts
back to the homepage, which is so gross.
But hold on. So I already saved my
blinks. Thank god. And I'm gonna grab it
because I wanna go over this.
It's just so gross how everything works today.
Because I happen to have it saved on
my
bookmarks.
Oh, here. Let me do this actually. This
will be faster.
And what we're gonna discuss
is the allegation of a report of some
kind of, you know, Iranian attack from the
inside and, like, the world in which they'd
somehow not show you that. And now with
what we're seeing today, on top of what
we just discussed, like the justification to somehow
invade Iran because of all of this.
So, here we are. Let's see.
Let's see. So, that would be Daily Mail.
Oops.
Oh, shoot.
Well, sorry to do this live. I guess
I screwed up big time today.
Damn it.
Damn it. That's so frustrating. I knew I
should've taken the screenshot. So the problem, guys,
is that I guess I didn't save these
these tabs, which I I can't believe I
did that today.
Oh, well. Now
we talk about this off on the show.
I very rarely do that, but I guess
I just I guess I didn't save the
tabs. That's frustrating seeing as how now I
can't close all of this. But, anyway, let's
see if we can figure this out somehow.
God, it's frustrating. See, that's why they do
this. I'm telling you. So I don't even
know if that would end up being,
Let me do this.
Let's see. Daily Mail.
Here, let me play something really quickly. I
really wanna find this, and then
we'll get back to it.
We have to condemn the atrocities that happen
every day to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault. Actually, the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in Muscovyya in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible. We put them
to Israel to, the government of Israel. And
you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual atrocity, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification
where people are not seen.
And we got it.
Just in time.
Frustrating, though, isn't it? You see the kind
of stuff we have to go through, how
ridiculous all this is? Well, anyway and now
and and now who knows what changed, by
the way? I think that's part of what
happens in that. But
here is the article.
Here's what it went back to. You see
my point? Like, it is that's nowhere to
be found. And here's even crazier. Let's just
do this for fun real quick since we're
not in a rush today. Let's see if
this pops up. I do this all the
time and I can't find these things, but
I'm sure it'll pop now. Where is the
search bar here?
If there even is one. Okay. Here it
is.
Let's see if it pops up.
Oh, I guess it did. In the past,
I've done that and I just couldn't find
it. But see, if I don't have the
the title, I wouldn't be able to find
it anyway. Okay. Let's get into it. So
I'm gonna I wanna keep keeping getting getting
us back on our mindset here, talking about
the invasion based on the idea that they're,
you know, enriching uranium, which, by the way,
is within their safeguard. So they're using what
is legally allowed within the agreements they're made
to justify an invasion to stop the thing
that's totally not what they claim it is.
Ridiculous all the time, guys, and they know
what they're doing. That's what's crazy. They know
they're lying about this unless at Trump's level,
they're being insulated by this, which I don't
know how's impossible with how with with Tucker
and others, whatever you're talking about. So in
this case, keeping in mind that we're we're
the argument goes back to before this. This
is March 6, saying that they got a
report
warning about
war arising threats because of the Iran war.
Now let me read it first, then we're
gonna, you know, take this in conjunction with
other reports of this coming, you know, like
an act active sleeper cell, and then what
just happened out front of Mamdani's mansion.
I do feel that there's a weird connection
to all of this. Now this is White
House blocks intelligence report. Blocks.
Warning of rising US homeland terror threat linked
to Iran war.
Just on the title, guys. I mean, doesn't
that immediately go why and that's what you
they would be waving in front of your
face to justify everything they're doing. Right?
Every time left or right my entire career.
This is the kind of thing they manufacture
to justify what they're doing
or that Israel manufacturers to justify or hide
their false flags they do against you. End
of the day,
it you could look at it two ways.
This is either, you know,
an effort like, this is what I thought
about it. I was like, this is either
a way to
make it more seen, like the Streisand effect,
for them to, like, Daily Mail report there.
Don't want you to see this. Right? And
everyone looks at it, which is kinda makes
sense to where they are. It's like barely
a new agenda.
Or
this is them trying to stop this because
maybe there is some truth to it, and
then it makes them look like they're weaker
than they want you to see.
Or or, you know, maybe this is them
being aware that Israel's doing this, and they're
really trying to hide this. Maybe they don't
want this to come to pass. Like, there's
all these weird elements to it. Because if
you understand the kind of people that are
around Trump
who clearly are about bringing on the end
times for Israel more than anything that this
government is doing,
maybe there's something going on. Maybe they now
are aware of some kind of inside double
crossing going on. You know, there's all these
different thoughts to be had. Put all that
aside, which is all just hypothetical consideration,
here's what the actual article says.
Donald Trump's White House is blocking
top US intelligence agencies,
which would be, you know, gathered at the
top. Right? And then whatever else they're filtering
through her, from warning law enforcement
across the country about rising threats to homeland
tied to his war with Iran. So what's
crazy to me is just on the surface,
that would mean quite literally that you're putting
police at risk
by withholding what the intelligence reports claim puts
them in danger.
You see what I mean? Like, how can
you even that's right off the bat. Whether
a liar or not, that makes you look
really bad. So that's what made me go,
well, maybe there's some level of truth to
this, which was why I then thought through
why that would make sense. You see what
I'm saying? Like, it's not just trying to
find what makes you know, what I like.
It's about trying to logically piece together why
these things would line up with that while
always considering that these are just assumptions and
then going back to what you can prove.
It's a practice, guys. It has to be
the same way every time. So in this
case,
for this to come out is gonna make
him look bad
because he's now I mean, what about the
local sheriff that's gonna like, what if something
like, what if one of these events just
happened turns out that it's tied to what
they were gonna tell them and some police
died? Wouldn't your wouldn't your local police be
outraged with the government for hiding that from
you? Wouldn't that mean that you're more concerned
with your personal agenda than the actual safety
of the American people?
Interesting. At least the framing of it. Right?
So it says the FBI, Homeland Security, and
the National Counterterrorism
Center were preparing
to put out a joint intelligence assessment or
statement. Now that would be I mean, I
argue that has to be Gabbard essentially coordinating
that as the director of national intelligence.
Now it says,
and
a joint statement on Friday to state and
to state and local authorities alerting them of
a heightened threat due to the ongoing war
with Iran. So specifically because of Iran.
So even that, again, the idea of, like,
false flags being real in this world, they
wouldn't surprise me if you have people both
from two conversations,
Iranian people who are not these ridiculous Shah
fake people that we see on the in
my opinion, that we see,
that are just regular Iranian people that happen
to be in United States for whatever reason
and, you know, maybe have their gripes with
their government but don't want what they're seeing.
Who then see or maybe their family just
got killed in Iran. Right? Who then act
out in violence. I'm not saying it was
justified.
I don't I personally, I would not condone
that, but they may feel it's justified. You
things like this drive people to take a
rational action. We've talked about this every time,
and then that will be their responsibility. They're
they're with the one they took the illegal
action that drove people to feel like they
need to take action back.
Right? That's different than condoning the response. They're
both violent that I don't support. Right? So
in this case,
where were we?
Heightened threat due to the ongoing war with
Iran, a DHS official said. Oh, it was
the that's where I was going with it.
The point is that then you could the
idea that you have Iranians in this country
doing that, and then you could also argue
that these are people that are, you know,
planted here to do that for some other
agenda. You know, at the end of the
day, though,
it's it's you could see a world in
which this might be exactly what they're claiming
it it is, and that's, again, why I
would think they might try to hide that
from you because it's sort of like the
Iran nuke point.
They always wanna threaten you with these false
flag actions to get you in place, but
I argue, at least from US perspective, they
don't always want to actually do things like
that.
Israel's quite different, though, but that's the so
in this case, you wonder whether that might
be what's happening. The bulletin, which was reviewed
by the Daily Mail, details elevated threats by
the government of Iran
to US military and government personnel and facilities.
Then he goes on to say Jewish and
Israeli institutions
and their perceived supporters and Iranian dissidents and
other anti regime activists. To me, that starts
to get a little bit more, like, I
when have you ever seen that?
Doesn't mean it's not capable or possible. Right?
But have you ever seen when is the
last time, as as Tucker pointed out, that
you've seen a Shiite or Iran government attack
anywhere in this country?
You don't. Hasn't. So by that by that
logic, it's probably unlikely
unless they drove them to extreme action, which
he might rationalize. Right? But the point comes
down to why would they do that? Why
would Iran, one, unless it's driven to this
extreme level? At like, the if I I
said this in the very beginning,
legally, Iran has every right to attack and
respond to The United States
because of what they did.
They did not, though, and I'm glad for
that because they're they know what that would
cause. They know that would spin this out
to a degree that they probably that whether
it's in their interest or not, that Trump
would drive because just that's who he is.
So they didn't, though. They they hit US
targets, but not in the homeland.
Right? So I think that's a big thing
to think about is that overall,
that you have the the focus here they're
claiming is to be on US military government
personnel, Jewish and Israeli facility. Like, why Jewish?
That Iran is not out there fighting Jewish
people despite the ridiculous claims they make. That's
not true. Exist we've gone over them extensively.
It's just I hate that we have to
even constantly push back on those things for
the one people that, you know, that might
think that's the case. The reality is quite
clear like it was with Hamas or anything
else. They're fighting the Zionist entity. That has
overlapped with the Judaism point because of what
Israel's been doing, but they make that clear.
In fact, what they're fighting here mostly is
The United States according to the Iranian government.
Not us, but the government.
And then it goes on to say, perceived
supporters?
Like, just what reason do we have to
think Iran would just lash out at people
out there supporting what they're doing? It doesn't
make any sense. That's what Israel and US
does. And Iranian dissidents and other regime activists,
it just seems like a sprawling claim. You're
all in danger.
That makes me feel a little bit the
other way. Radicalized
individuals with a variety of ideological backgrounds.
Okay? It's just a that's a catchall. Right?
Everybody
may also may see this conflict or other
geographical
events and then, you know,
act violently. They do this every single time.
It opens the door for anything, anywhere.
Maybe by maybe false flag, maybe just genuine.
The point though is that poor. Yeah. You
do things crazy. People may act crazy. It
doesn't mean that we have to shut things
down and and act differently because of your
act. You're creating this in the world.
But what they mean, usually in my opinion,
is this opens the door for,
you know, problem reaction solution scenarios.
Five page bulletin blocked by the White House.
Remember, they're blocking this. Provide specific details on
how the Iranian proxies may carry out attacks
across the country, which I don't believe. I
don't think there's any logic to that other
than the possibility that this might be something
they have to go to in extreme reaction
to what they continue to do. One section
explains how law enforcement official enforcement can respond
to this type of violence.
The official title is a public safety awareness
report elevated threat in The United States during
US Iran conflict.
An illegal war they started.
Homeland Security broke protocol and gave the White
House
a heads up.
And this just shows you who they're working
for. It's all it's this is the Bria.
This is the Bonnie point. It's the Nome
point. They're literally working directly at the behest
of the US government even though, same with
cash, they're supposed to be some kind of
a separate entity. And in some cases, might
even have to investigate the president, but not
when they're there because they're
employees of this presidency.
And Homeland Security broke protocol,
right, and gave the White House a heads
up about it, which they claim is why
they shut it down. Trump officials
ordered it to be placed on hold. The
White House did not deny blocking the terrible
thing in the statement to the Daily Mail.
So that that to me opens a little
bit. So you're telling me now the White
House admitted to you to be holding
I there's this doesn't smell right.
Everything about this feels wrong because now you're
admitting that you did something that might put
people in risk? Police?
Alright. This isn't there's just there's clearly something
wrong here.
The White House is coordinating closely with all
government agencies to ensure information being disseminated is
accurate.
Oh, now they care about accuracy, do they?
Up to date and has been properly vetted
even if it means taking additional time to
review and ensure nothing is done in a
vacuum.
Great. So every other discernible conversation, they don't
even care about hiding, lying, misinformation,
but now they gotta be absolutely sure about
something that very well could leave people in
danger if that's the reality.
The senior DHS official, however, disputed what the
White House said. Quote, the three agencies were
going to release a joint intelligence statement that
would elevate the threat
and start addressing the Iranian threat on American
soil. The White House stopped it and verbalized
down to DHS that any unclassified
for official use only information going forward concerning
Iran has to be reviewed by the White
House before any dissemination.
So right here, you could consider the possibility
that what you're dealing with is Trump's growing
awareness of how he's being played. Now I
think he knows he's being influenced. I think
he knows he's, you know, playing this game
with, you know, letting Israel do what it
wants, but I don't think he wants to
see himself as being fooled by it. And
so you might start to realize that this
is something Israel was trying to conduct because
they you can clearly see that they feel
like they can do whatever they want in
this country as it as the current government.
And so you could consider it as something
they're trying to create, maybe even going through
the DHS from Israel to put this out,
which is what even Wilkerson told you, that
they run the Pentagon. That's what he said
explicitly that he was told. And so you
then see this being a threat that he
may not want to be seen. And so,
hey. Hey. Let's hold on. This isn't accurate.
I don't know. That's just a thought that,
you know, there there is these this is
getting to a place where this is getting
you're
Everything's going so slow today.
It's unquestionable that the Epstein business was
heavily influenced, let me put it that way,
by Muslin.
And so that's
somehow emblematic on these huge geopolitical issues?
Yes. I I watched Mossad
take over the Pentagon
in 2002.
The Pentagon was infiltrated
by Mossad.
They did not need any identification
to get through the river entrance to the
building. They went upstairs to Douglas Fife, the
undersecretary of defenses for Well, doesn't that sound
exactly like Netanyahu in the White House?
Funny. Funny why Bannon tried to make that
out to be embarrassing him. Right? It almost
like he's got other intentions.
Policy,
the third most powerful man in the defense
department.
Occasionally, they went to the second most powerful
man, Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense,
and they had run of the Pentagon. Donald
Rumsfeld, the secretary of defense, said to my
boss one time, hell, I don't run my
building.
Mossad does.
It's amazing what we can ignore in this
country.
The White House stopped it. DHS's decision to
inform the White House was done against the
wishes of the FBI leadership.
So, you know, who knows? Kash Patel, maybe
it's probably doesn't even mean him when they're
mentioning that.
White House is now in he he was
busy partying with the with the the football
win or whoever the new thing he is
he thinks he's part of.
White House is now inserting themselves.
This can have a chilling effect on keeping
state and local law enforcement informed about ongoing
terrorist threats
to the homeland posed by Iran,
said the official.
Again, I don't think there is a threat
posed by Iran to this country right now
other than what they they might be driven
to do because of what they're continuing to
do to
them. That's important to think about. I'm not
saying they're not capable of doing that. What
I'm saying is I don't see why they
would see that as in their interest,
which it's clearly not because of what it
would cause unless they're point to the point
to where that's their last possible option. That's
where they seem to be driving
to. Like, almost by design. Right? They're almost
like they want Iran to take elite irrational
action against The United States so Israel could
push it even further.
Typically, these intel bulletins would be issued to
law enforcement without input from the White House
to avoid politicizing intelligence communications. You see that's
they don't care about the way things normally
go. They're on a lockdown control right now
because you know why.
Intelligence products for the law enforcement are supposed
to be neutral, fact based.
So here is the report from today.
Iran may be activating sleeper cells outside the
country, alert says.
Interesting. Right? The connection to this and timing
of it. So suddenly, now you have an
actionable report, it seems, about the thing that
that Trump was just trying to cover up.
There's already people making these arguments,
which may be the case. Right? I mean,
as we covered, that certainly is one of
the possibilities, but it feels wrong to me.
Right? It feels like either he's being set
up by Israel or somebody else or that
this is not the way it actually went
down because it doesn't make sense to me
that they wouldn't be waving this in front
of your face like they have every time
I've ever seen those reports,
most of which end up being something that
are rooted in fake intelligence from Israel or
something like that.
Now it says The US has intercepted
in encrypted
communications.
So there so we're told by by the
government, believed to have originated in Iran. So
we're already at secondary
maybe things, right, that may serve, that's the
third one, as a operational trigger for sleeper
assets outside the country.
So we don't know is the question. That's
the headline. Things we're not sure about. Breaking
story. According to federal government alerts sent to
law enforcement agencies,
The alert reviewed by ABC News cites preliminary
signal analysis.
Woah, woah,
woah. Preliminary analysis
about something that they believed might be in
Iran that may be this thing over here.
That's some sound reporting.
And why are they even reporting this if
it's like that? Right? It says of alert
reviewed by ABC of a preliminary signal analysis
of a transmission likely of Iran origin that
was relayed across multiple countries shortly after the
death of Khamenei.
Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran, was killed
by US Israeli attack on February 28. It
was illegal. Not an it was a assassination.
The intercepted transmission was encoded and appeared to
be destined for clandestine receipts recipients.
Appeared to be. Why why are we still
I mean, this is embarrassing at this point.
Not not you could even you could say
ABC News because they're all the same to
me, but what they're trying to push. And
this very well it may be the case,
but it is already, like, three times removed
from what we don't know. Maybe it was
out of Iran, maybe not. Maybe it was
doing this, maybe it wasn't. May, you know,
may maybe clandestine, maybe not.
That seems silly to me. It really does.
Who possesses the encryption key? The kind of
message intended to impart instructions
to covert operatives.
Maybe not, though. That's what they're saying. This
is the kind of message that may be
like that.
Without the use of Internet or cellular networks.
I mean, I'm not diminishing the possibility. Clearly,
this is something that might be going on
today.
But with all we've seen, for how often
they're lying about this, it just doesn't line
up at all. It's possible the transmission, possible,
could, quote, be intended to activate or provide
instructions to pre position sleeper assets operating outside
the country. So off of the fact that
we still don't even know where it came
from or who it's directed to or what
it might accomplish, What we think maybe is
that it might be intended to activate things
that might exist somewhere outside the country, but
we're not sure.
That's some I mean,
it's it's that's worthy of laughing about. While
this exact contents of these transmissions cannot currently
be determined, that's what it literally says,
with a sudden appearance of a new station
with international
rebroadcast characteristics, Warren's heightened situational awareness
sound. While the alert is careful to say
that there is no operational threat tied to
this location.
Wait. What?
Wait. Okay. So now now the last thing
you include is that there's also no discernible
threat
of something we can't verify from place we
don't know from doing something we can't really
understand that may be happening outside the country.
And we're not even sure if it's a
threat to you. But just in case. But
so you're so over here, you have like,
here's actually a funny overlap.
Maybe this is what they pulled back on.
I don't know. Maybe that's what they said.
Well, that's ridiculous, but I don't believe that.
I believe that government, like all of them,
would use the lies to sell you on
anything. But you see how flimsy this is?
Well, the alert said careful there's no threat,
specific location. It does instruct law enforcement agencies
to increase their monitoring of suspicious
activity. Yes. That's always the case. Oh, they
always want you to increase their activity of
spying on you. If the contents of the
alert prove true, it would confirm the fears
expressed by law enforcement officials
after The US and Israel struck Iran at
the sleeper cells. But yeah. You remember remember
when you had the the,
what is his name? CIA
Ryan, Shaw,
Sean Ryan.
But that that weird moment when Jones was
all pulling his hair out about how the
sleeper, the drones sniffing for bombs, and they're
coming over Ron, and all and that was
a nothing that was based on
nonsense. Not that's not possible, not that they
don't have them, not that it wouldn't be
something that could happen, but what they were
doing was based on nothing. Just like the
Bolton Limpet Mines, and that spun out. They
had that fake interview with Sean Ryan where
they got proved to be writing that email
they lied about. I mean, what? I said,
what the hell is happening?
And so
they created this idea of this possible threat.
And now they're putting out what I believe
is probably intel Israeli intelligence fed lies about
unknown things that might happen tomorrow about the
it's just insane
what we get led by. Now the only
difference is why it's not being shoved in
your face now, and I wanna continue to
reiterate that.
I just think that's really interesting.
Again, how about we do this again? We'd
like to talk well, how about we should
hope, like we all should always hope, that
maybe,
maybe for whatever reason, he's always been fooled.
And for whatever reason, he just saw it
and is now gonna call it all out.
I mean, despite the ridiculous cue, which is
not, you know, with the save it was
real for last, and we say it's the
lie after lie after lie, even if that
ends up happening, it would not verify that
that thing was always right. The point though
is that it very well may end up
being something that happens. It wouldn't suddenly mean
everything they ever said was true. That's actually
false. But
we could hope for that, shouldn't we? I
doubt it will ever be the reality, but
for some reason that they suddenly realized it
and there'd been a big announcement that said,
I see what Israel is doing to us.
Well, that'd be great. I would be more
skeptical than ever because that feels very off,
but we should hope for that. You see,
it's kind of a hard thing for people
to wrap their minds around because you get
in these positions where you're so, like, I
agree. I think these people are monsters. I
think what they're doing is objectively obvious, and
I think what they're doing is against us.
Now if he suddenly came out and called
it all out, it would be very difficult
for me to
accept that that's happening because I just don't
think that's who they are, but I would
be open to it.
I think that's really important to consider.
Now this is CBS News, Mark, from ninth.
Suspects charged in alleged ISIS spire inspired attack
in New in near, the basically
Mamdani's
mayoral mayoral mansion.
I find this very strange. Now the the
the quick breakdown is that, like, there was
protests.
Now you have to remember, Donald Trump basically
endorsed this guy after the fact. He went
in the Oval Office after everybody, but screening
about how mom Donnie was gonna be the
Muslim invasion and now we're gonna ever I
mean, even Loomer who he apparently listens to.
And they were going crazy about this guy,
who I I there's actually multiple reasons why
I don't trust him at all.
Despite his statements about Israel, there's things he
did that we've talked about that even early
on actions about things he did with the
synagogue and this weird stuff he did. But
the point,
Trump said this guy is gonna be great
for New York. He basically called him MAGA.
I mean, I don't mean that in some
kind of my that he that's what he
said.
So, here we are. We're still you got
the the team out there acting like mom
Donnie's, like, the worst anti so how do
you make sense of him being the the
the anti, like, Democrat, pedophile, monster, whatever you're
framing him as, and then not acknowledging Trump
basically saying he's great.
So my point in saying all that is
you have this protest that went on where
you got people out there who are MAGA
movement people screaming about how he's taking over
the country with Muslims and Sharia law, which
is just ridiculous.
Now that it's not possible, but the reality
of what he's saying is not actually what's
happening. The facts don't align with that. There's
not a single example of any of those
things happening in regard to Sharia law. That's
why Randy Fine and the rest are clearly
not in your interest. They're acting against American
interest.
But so you're out there protesting,
which is their right. Whether paid or not,
you could protest against that where you think
it's happening. Then you had a counter protest.
People came out and countered the protest against
them saying, you know, know, whatever. Like, the
people it's basically, like, you know, the pro
Palestine, anti Palestine, same kind of thing. They
were out there protesting in free I think
it reads a little bit in here. There
there was more to it elsewhere. I just
wanna give you the quick details. Then what
happened was apparently, this is how the story
goes,
two of the counter protesters.
So if you're understanding it, the people who
are protesting against the anti Muslim sentiment,
protesting
for the support of Mamdani,
decided, they claim,
to throw a bomb at them.
But I guess toward mom Donnie's home because
that makes sense.
And
ISIS and bad guy stuff. Right? And that's
them protesting
against what they're claiming, which by the way
is that you guys are terrorists.
That make sense? Certainly lines up, doesn't it?
These guy but and look. It is possible.
Like I said, people can be irrational when
crazy things are happening. But doesn't that feel
a little bit weird that it seems like
or like we've already proven to you more
times than I can count that this exact
thing happens,
and then it turns out to be the
opposite, or somebody faked it, or you didn't
get stabbed in the eye with a flag,
you actually made it all up, and you
lied to the media about it. That happens
all the time, guys. And then you can
clearly show Israel paying, influencing, and lying across
the board. Doesn't mean we should pretend that's
always what's happening. Be objective. But we know
they're doing it. It's been openly discussed. So,
in this case, we should wonder whether or
not this perfectly timed off the back of
two stories
about bad evil Iran, ISIS, which aren't the
same thing, but that's how Israel frames it,
happening inside The United States, and then boom,
we see this.
Near a police commissioner
talked about homemade bombs,
ISIS inspired attack.
Officials said two devices found on mayor Zoran
Mamdani's residence were improvised explosive devices, which by
the way,
IEDs?
Is that exactly what Trump was just telling
you? They're the kings of the roadside bomb.
That's what that is. When's the last time
you heard about an IED anywhere?
Funny how suddenly after they bring back something
from the Iraq war, which is when that
dates back to.
That's when that goes to, guys. There has
not been an example of that from Iran's
connection. Even then, I argue that's likely not
even what's actually happening, not in the in
the larger sense, not that they weren't using
missiles and bombs or whatever else, but that
this was a framing that they used a
certain way.
But now Trump tells you that the king
of the bile is because Israel makes that
point because that's all they could point to
because there is no example of Iran doing
anything like they claim.
And now suddenly, you got an ID being
used in front of mom Donnie's home from
people allegedly protesting for Muslims?
I mean, seriously, guys. Like, of course. Yes.
That's possible. But are we really gonna pretend
like that's not outrageously
ridiculous?
Like, this is, like, a cartoon version, or
rather this is what Israel would paint it
as. It's despite the reality.
Officials said two devices
found at his home, IEDs, that could have
seriously injured or killed somebody, but apparently did
not.
A third device is being investigated.
This was a planned attack motivated by extremist
ideology and inspired by violent foreign terrorist organizations.
You know why they say that? Because apparently,
these guys literally said that.
This is because of ISIS, and I am
an ISIS guy, and I believe in terrorism.
That's, like, what we're talking about.
This is silly to
me. While certainly possible,
seems almost cartoonish.
And this is what I expect from these
people. And remember,
this is FBI launches an investigation. Remember who
we're talking about here, guys? The FBI launches
a terrorism investigation into the incident.
And on Monday, federal prosecutors of Southern District
Of New York unveiled charges, of course, against
18 year old, Amir Balat, and 19 year
old, Ibrahim
Kayumni or Kayumy.
I personally feel like those are names that
don't usually align with, you know, like like,
I I find it humorous, but you could
decide I think that's irrelevant. It's just kind
of a a observing
point. Who were taken into custody following the
chaos on Manhattan's Upper East Side.
I still I I do I I genuinely
find it, like, almost absurd that we still
pretend that these drawings or cartoons
just take their picture. What are we talking
about? Why do we pretend like some guy
randomly sketching what seems to be bad drawings
of people is somehow like, why does that
make sense to anybody?
Like, at the very least, get somebody who
can draw them that looks like them, not
these weird sketches you guys do. They're like
abstract art drawings. Why does that make sense
to anybody? I've never actually pointed it out
on the show, but I laugh about that
every single time.
Then if you don't want photos, then then
pick one court the ordained photo taker. It
just seems so stupid. Anyway,
1819.
Tish said Kyumi waived his Miranda rights, which
makes no sense, and told police that he
watched ISIS propaganda on his phone.
Geist.
Yeah. Certainly possible. But doesn't that seem like
it's like you hand it's like this is
the narrative they're telling you. Oh my god.
We've got these people talking about pro you
know, in in fact, I'm I'm gonna overlap
with something that I was planning on doing
in a later show. Let me see if
I grab it real quick.
That I think is actually very relevant to
this right now.
This comes down to yeah. Perfect. Here it
is.
And I will I'll get into this in
the next show more in-depth when we get
into this point. Yeah. I plan on getting
more into this in a larger sense as
you'll see in a second. But this to
include this is perfectly aligned to what we're
just discussing.
Because what we're talking about, guys, is like
this almost like this cartoon narrative about, you
know, we all they got propagandized by reading
things on their phone and and, you you
know, whatever, which I get is is possible.
In fact, it's what they're doing to everybody
they can online.
But this is what we're hearing in The
UK. And and I had to make sure
that this wasn't
fake because of almost how,
like, in past, it used to be more,
like, I guess, nuanced.
Not just, like, the on the face clumsy
thing. The this this real ad in The
UK, to me, looks like a Saturday Night
Live skit about what it we're we're dealing
with, but this is real. It is The
UK, but, guys, this is the same sentiment
we're getting everywhere. The same, like, anti free
speech sentiment they claim is somehow about protecting
free speech or or, you know, whatever else.
It's like the Charlie Kirk using of him
is my point. But check this out.
I just got all my advice taken away
by the police.
My mom couldn't believe it.
I might get a criminal record and not
be able to go to college.
I only shared a link.
I just thought it was funny.
But it was terrorist content.
And that is not a game. It's real
life.
Wow.
I mean, that might take the cake even
over the the war the the your brain
on drugs ridiculousness.
Right? Like, really, the they made it about
cannabis for the most part, and they and
it's absurd.
Or that that gave the the dog anyway,
all those absurd things we saw in the
past.
I I mean, that's I I shared a
link.
Are you kidding me? So now simply, like,
it like, I just I got it so
over the top. And it still claimed, like,
freedom and free speech and freedom of ideology,
but not that. Not that word. Not this
sentiment. Not when you say it like that.
It's all there. And Elon Musk and the
rest are all up in arms about things
in certain categories and only in The UK,
but then failed to acknowledge that he's doing
that to you here or everyone else in
the US government.
So back to the point,
the guy weighs his Miranda rights and then
goes, I watched ISIS on my phone, and
that's why it all happened.
Get get ready. It's already happening. We need
to crack down on this. We can't let
them say these things. We can't have them
look at propaganda like this every single time.
Left or right, it's always the same. Bilat
also waived his rights, of course, and wrote
a statement declaring his allegiance to the Islamic
State.
There's just
I mean, guys, come on. Like, what I'm
waiting for because this just happened, I'm waiting
for the other experts out there. Right? Where
are the people out there to break this
down? Like, is does that look valid to
you? Does that look like a soda can
wrapped in duct tape? Or does that look
like something more? Because none of them apparently
did anything. Like, are we being gaslit in
a very clumsy narrative? I don't know. But
overall, the whole thing
feels wrong.
The timing of it, and I feel my
opinion, is that we are being gaslit into
supporting something that they know nobody supports.
Here's Trump from 2019. It's all these have
gone around, but it's important to remember this.
The United States has spent $8,000,000,000,000
fighting and policing The Middle East.
Thousands of our great soldiers have died or
been badly wounded. Millions of people have died
on the other side. Going into the Middle
East is the worst decision ever made. Now,
of course, you're gonna and then you're massing
everybody else 100%. That was recently.
Is that you're gonna get the argument. Well,
he didn't start it. Well, he did, though.
That's so you're dumb. But you'll just pretend
that's not the case. Oh, he didn't he
didn't do this. It's their fault. They're the
ones. And or Obama and Biden or whatever.
He has to end it. Okay. Fine. It's
the the what you're doing is still objectively
getting involved in the Middle East in exactly
the same way that you told us was
a mistake.
He just says what you want to hear
in the moment,
just like he's doing now.
His actions, on the other hand, have always
revealed him, if you're being honest with yourself.
But this is what they all do.
They feed you what you want to hear
in the moment. Sometimes it aligns what they
think, sort of.
But the reality, guys, as I just showed
you today, we're gonna get into some of
the stuff that I showed you yesterday.
One weekend of the Iran war, the fallout
is global.
What began last Saturday as coordinated attacks on
Iran by The US and Israel has spiraled,
sprawled into a wider conflict with for repercussions
around the world. It's already gone. This framing
of some kind of focus limited, it's gone.
Gone.
Unless they just decide to stop, which they
could. But I highly doubt that's gonna happen.
So this means what we're seeing is the
ongoing thing, the quagmire that we all knew
was gonna happen, that Israel wanted to happen.
Now what I wanna show you really quickly
is this is funny to me that this
came out, the title. Right? And that's not
that's not what The US or Israel wants
to be framed as. Right? That's not the
the narrative they want you to see.
So here this is this this, stems to
NPR, which is a clear, connected propaganda platform
in my opinion. So check this out. I
searched the title because I was trying to
find the article.
Tons of people shared it. Like, top like,
five pages of different, like, local radio and,
you know, because it's NPR. Right? So it
goes very far.
Check this out, though. Every one of them
says, one week into the Iran war, the
dangers for The US and Israel are the
fallout is global. Right? That was a slight
deviation, but this one, they're all, one week
in, the fallout's global. One week in, the
fallout's global. Now you go through and click
any one of these.
Any one of
them. They now say the new title. Trump
warns Iran. Oh, dang it. Trump warns Iran
will be hit very hard as the enters
second week. Well, woah. That's quite a bit
different than global war, isn't it? I just
wanna point out, guys, that it's how this
stuff this is him condensing Fox News to
not air the thing because it embarrassed him.
This is them reaching out and going chain
for damn title. I mean, how else do
you explain that?
And my point is I have one. I
only found one that actually maintained the original
title.
I'm not sure why. But
you look. It's all right there.
This is just how this stuff works, guys.
Now
where we get into the actual bombings and
and what I think demonstrates the weakness of
their position
is the fact that they have to lie
about this stuff. Now I say this all
the time. They they would not need to
lie about this if they were the one
like, if they were
effectively completely destroying them, they wouldn't need to
lie about certain parts of what happened. Right?
And so in this case,
March 7,
Trump says Iran, which is being beat to
hell, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle
East neighbors. Let's check, make sure he didn't
delete this one and remove it already because
now it keeps doing that.
Apologized and surrendered. That's what he said.
The the loser's Middle East. He's such a
child. Okay.
So Trump comes out and says that. I
said, it's just embarrassing
and desperate
because
it's so obviously not what actually happened. It's
not. We'll get into the details. They act
in fact, are
what you know, well, I'll read it exactly
from what's happening is the ultimate point is
that they're trying to give the other asset
the other, regional
entities an opportunity to pull away from this
After they've been bombing them, by the way,
and not been bombed back in most cases.
Right? Other than US and Israel.
For him to lie about this,
knowing most of the world would see it
for what it is because it's I think
that it's broadly reported.
That's nothing if not desperate.
I always want you to think about that.
Like, knowing that right you can see
the actions of the bombings.
Right? That Iran bombed a lot of these
other places.
You know, UAE. We talked about all of
this the other day.
Most of them haven't returned it as far
as, I think, of all or more than
US and Israel,
and then stops those bombings, successful attacks on
them and says, look. We don't want you
to be a part of this. We want
to stop the bombings on you unless you
continue bombing us. We're gonna continue bombing US
and Israel. He stands up and goes, they
surrendered.
I mean, guys, that's the weakest thing I've
ever seen. You know nobody see everyone sees
that. This is not some secret report. Everyone
sees what just happened, and you wanna frame
it as surrender. It just makes you look
weaker than I've ever seen you.
Why would they lie about that? I genuinely
don't understand that unless they're in a bad
position.
I but I maybe though I'm missing something
as always. Here's what, beat bet, bet beat
media had to say. Aron's apology is a
trap, and the West fell right into it.
I tend to see it similarly in the
way that they do these where they, you
know, they know the the hubris.
Sort of like the, the last time Trump
tried to overthrow Venezuela in his last administration.
They that's what happened is he I guess
they thought they had
just they see themselves as insurmountable. Right? And
so they tried to make the deals. They
got all the general the military personnel, then
they convinced them that they were going to
take over. And then when they actually initiated
it, they all turned and sided with Maduro,
and they set him up, and they made
them look really stupid.
And I think that's genuinely because they just
thought that they were able nobody can stop
us, and they they didn't win. So it's
I think we see it a lot, in
fact. So Western headlines this morning tell a
simple story. Iran is buckling. President Masoud is
they they report has apologized to Iranian strikes
in the Gulf neighbors and promised to halt
further attacks. Donald Trump was quick to claim
credit, asserting the apology was only made because
of relentless US and Israeli attack. The implication
across Western meet
western mainstream western coverage is clear. The bombing
campaign is working and Iran is starting to
crumble.
But the full picture tells a very different
story, one that most of the outlets are
either unable or unwilling to assemble.
He categorically rejected Trump's demand for unconditional surrender.
Not everybody reported that, but we did. We
told you.
Right in the beginning, I saw it discussed
in Pierce. Dave Smith pointed it out. There
and this was Israeli reporting through his Italy
contacts. He offered a ceasefire
very early,
and they flatly denied it.
And I think that made him very angry.
And I think that might have been why
maybe Israel tried to drive this beyond Trump's
decisions because they thought maybe he was trying
to pull back. I mean, these things do
exist in the conversation whenever you think of
Trump
as a possibility.
Declaring that's a dream that they should have
they should take to their grave, Iran said.
That is not the language of a man
capitulating.
I agree.
He also framed the apology conditionally. Iran would
halt the strikes on neighboring countries, he said,
unless we're attacked from those countries.
It's a warning wrapped in an olive branch.
I agree completely. In fact, that's not even
debatable, guys. You could argue behind it. There's
weakness that we don't see, but the way
he's stating that is pretty damn clear. That's
not surrender.
So the fact that we even have to
break that down is example of how broken
things are, but that's what I'm talking about,
guys. They're lying to you.
Ryan Grim points out, Gulf countries learning the
hard way that to be an enemy of
The United States is dangerous, but to be
a friend is fatal.
It's exactly the same point with Israel. The
US ends this whole point of, like, who
needs friend who needs enemies when you got
friends like Israel? The US has earned global
pariah status. Our raw power staves that off,
but for how long? Now this has been
deleted. I'm not sure why. Maybe pressure. Maybe
he doesn't believe it anymore.
This is this was, what was it again?
The oh, shoot. Here.
I wanna get his title.
Founding chairman Al Habitor Group. See what this
says.
Founding chairman, same thing, and,
from Dubai.
So he spoke up
before deleting it and said, dear mister president,
this is on the archive,
direct question,
who gave you the decision
to plunge our region into war with Iran?
The right, you know, the ability. On what
basis did you make this dangerous decision? Because
it was translated.
Did you calculate collateral damage before you pulled
the trigger? Have you ever thought that this
first cut this first that the first countries
in the region will be harmed by this
escalation? Meaning them in the way? Yeah. I'm
sure he did. The people of this region
also have the right to ask. Was this
your decision alone, or it came from a
result of pressure from Netanyahu and its government?
You see, this is why this got pulled
back. My opinion.
I have put countries, Gulf Cooperation Council, the
Arab countries are in the heart of a
danger they did not choose. Thank god we
are strong and able to defend ourselves, and
we have armies and defenses that protect our
countries. But the question remains,
who allowed you to turn our region into
a war zone? It's pretty scathing. Before the
ink dries on initiative, Board of Peace, in
the name of peace and stability, what which
you declared,
how insulting, we find ourselves facing a military
escalation that puts the entire region at risk.
Where did these initiatives go?
What is the fate of the pledges that
were made name of peace? I guess if
you actually believe that, then that's on you
because their world actions up until that moment
demonstrate the dishonesty of that. Most of the
funding offered for these initiatives came from countries
in the region itself, and then he then
he created war for them. So they paid
for Peace Board, and then he shoved them
into war. Fantastic.
And from Gulf countries that contributed billions of
dollars, right, except Israel, only one that didn't
have to pay, of course, because they
refused to and they still let them in.
These countries have the right to ask today,
where did that money go? Probably to Israel.
Are we financing peace initiatives or financing a
war that puts us at risk?
This is important, guys. That's why it was
deleted.
What is more dangerous is that your decision
not only threatens the peoples of the region,
but also reaches the American people to whom
you promised peace and prosperity.
Today, he finds himself at a war financed
by his own money and taxes. According to
the Policy Institute, the cost ranges between 40
and $65,000,000,000
for direct military operations and may reach 210,000,000,000.
Somewhere between there was the estimate that our
own side put out, including economic impacts and
indirect losses
as it lasts four to five weeks. Yeah.
Let alone a couple years, a decade. That's
when we get into the trillions like the
war of terror.
It has even reached the point of sacrificing
the Americans themselves in which
in
in a war in which they have no
stake.
Man,
you broke you even broke your promises not
to get involved in wars and to care
only about America and put it at the
top of your priorities.
As you ordered foreign military interventions during your
second term that included seven countries,
Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, Venezuela,
in addition to naval operations in the Caribbean
and Eastern Pacific or Eastern Pacific Ocean. You
launched more than 658
foreign air strikes in your first year alone,
which is equivalent to the total strikes in
Biden's entire term.
You and you criticized him for involving The
United States in foreign wars.
Mister
president, these numbers have had a profound impact
on your approval ratings among Americans. See, the
world can see it. We lie to ourselves,
which have declined since your second inauguration, a
9% drop in just 400.
These numbers say something clear. Even inside The
United States, there is a growing concern about
being drawn into the new war and about
exposing American lives, economies, futures to unnecessary risks.
True leadership is not measured by war decisions,
but by wisdom,
by respect for others, I'll add by restraint,
and a push toward peace. If these initiatives
were launched in the name of peace, we
have a right to demand today full transparency
and clear
accountability.
That's important.
I was gonna take a screenshot.
Oh, I guess I can't get it all.
I'll do it later. Oh, there we go.
I want people to be able to see
what he actually said.
It's now gone, of course. That's how that
works. Oops. That's not what I wanted.
There we go. See? We'll we'll help it
out helping out. That's how we do it
For everybody else.
So Sagar points out to achieve unconditional surrender
that they're demanding.
In the past,
we had to drop two atomic bombs,
invade Europe,
and support the Soviet Union taking 400,000
casualties
in 1945 alone.
This is a declaration not only of regime
change, but at a prolonged
quagmire if we don't reverse course.
How does anybody not acknowledge that at this
point?
As this person says, feels like we're ripping
up the off ramps as we go. Trump
increasingly must know this messed up. Everyone sees
this, but they continue because I don't think
they have a choice.
Menchel sit points out, Iran
strikes several US bases in seven Arab countries
for seven days,
destroying vital radars. Cutter being one of the
$1,100,000,000,
Douglas McGregor just said that they took out
the eyes.
None of those countries retaliated.
Iran says the punishment for them is over
unless more US attacks come from their land.
Trump, they've surrendered.
Everyone's laughing at them.
Armchair warlord
pointing out some places that were bombed according
to the radar that they claimed were not.
Again, showing weakness to me.
He says, it occurs to me that we're
seeing a pattern here. The Iranians are probably
baiting our air and missile defense radars in
The Middle East into illuminating giving up their
exact positions with ballistic missiles, then killing them
with drones. Weirdly, exactly what we were being
told was happening in reverse.
Maybe both. Maybe, maybe this is wrong. The
cruise drones are, by all indications, quite precise
and effective enough at sliding through fighter sweeps
and very limited,
SHORAD coverage that exists, likely because the Iranians
got a dress rehearsal last year and the
Russians have shared industrial amounts of combat data
from Ukraine with them. It's just so his
opinion. I just felt it was insightful. We've
lost a terrifying proportion of the total number
of THAAD radars in ex existence just in
the last week, not to mention some ultra
heavy fixed radar installations
and an unknown number of Patriot radars.
We've already we're we are already seeing the
results of this. Missile warnings in Israel have
already decreased to a matter of seconds. Missile
warnings in The Gulf States are sporadic and
nonexistent.
Replacement systems, which they're critical about, replacement systems
are being frantically flown into the Middle East
from elsewhere.
And the Iranians are getting essentially the same
number of missiles through and continuing to strike
important targets despite significantly fewer launches, which is
what they tried to claim showed they were
weak. Does not. Not as far as I
can tell. Shows restraint, which were, I would
argue, more likely. And,
rationing is the word I was looking for.
But, you know, consider both.
Suggesting their me that's what he says right
here. Metering their launch campaign by effects to
on target to sustain a long war.
This also,
by the way, suggests that we got head
faked by Iranian strike doctrine.
We've been laser focused on countering the flashy
high end of their strike system, the ballistic
force missile force, while the Iranians didn't use
their drones very effectively in previous rounds. And
by the way, in their own conversations, they
stressed this, that they have plenty of things
they what they haven't even used yet because
they wanted waiting for this moment
or at least where this may go in
some, like, real engaged war, which is essentially
where this goes to be right now with
their invasion on the ground.
So it says during the twelve day war,
the trick the trickle of of,
was it, Sha'ids? The Iranians flew off was
trivially
intercept in in interdicted by fighter sweeps, which
may have lulled The US and Israel war
planners into a false sense of security about
the true effectiveness of their weapons.
This may have been precisely the impression the
Iranians wanted us to have of what we
know. From ex extensive combat used in Ukraine,
it is pretty formidable weapon. The Iranians may
actually have taken a pretty serious lesson from
Ukraine that flashy weapons draw fire and shifted
to considering their drone force easily produced in
gigantic quantities,
quiet to launch, easy to store, frustratingly difficult
to intercept, and lethal and precise enough to
disable key nodes, be their primary striking arm.
What did they just tell you?
Rubio, Miller, they've got drones and missiles that
have too many and we can't do anything
about it. Well, that's not a crime. You're
basically saying that they're better than us right
now. We can't allow that, or they might
be able to get there. We can't allow
them to legally get to a place where
we can't do anything about that. These are
just monsters, guys. What they're showing you is
who they really are. And so the point
overall is that they leaned into that direction,
which seems smart. Now, I also think it's
interesting that we've been talking about drones and
this stuff forever.
But do you know why I think we
haven't truly gone the route like they have?
Because we're tacked into this merchants of death
system, where the Lockheed Martins and all these
groups are are hooked into their usual contracts,
all these massive weapons that in many cases
are becoming unnecessary today.
It's just it's just this old decrepit machine
that we exist in and even they can
see it, but they can't pull themselves out
of it in some cases.
Or or, you know, there's more going on
than we can see. I just thought this
was accurate to a degree based on his
assessment and what I see as well.
Now, as we showed you in the last
show,
this was on the seventh, so there's more
guaranteed over the last two days, but the
point is bombing residential and civilian buildings.
Rami Abdul,
EuroMed human rights group. As of this morning
on the seventh, they bombed they've hit 5,535
residential buildings,
1,041
commercial units. The strikes damage 14 health centers,
65 schools, 13 facilities linked to the Red
Crescent, which is independently reporting that themselves.
Of course, this person says it's called war,
idiot.
You see the kind of things we're dealing
with? Now who knows if that's an Israeli
bot or US bot or whatever else? But
literally, this person,
alarmingly, if it's a real person, believes that
it's just war. So you bomb whatever you
want. Well, that's what Miller's telling you. That's
what Rubio and and Hegseth are trying to
push. You see my point, guys? They're dragging
the world into this reality, which will only
cause more suffering for everybody.
They want you to believe it's okay to
just kill and murder and maim and steal
and rape and torture as long as you
do it, though, because the other side does
it first. Even though we have never seen
that and they actually haven't.
Max Blumenthal, while Iran methodically targets US forward
imperial bases and assets in the region, The
US's real war of terror demolishes civilian aircraft
at civilian airports in Iran. Now from my
perspective, there's been two examples that I can
see of of what we are argue are
civilian locations. One was Tel Aviv. That that
they all tried to that's one of the
points they keep pointing to, where they said,
Netanyahu stood there claiming, oh my god. They
killed all the civilians when already John Kiriakou
on Piers Morgan was forced to admit that,
which we already know,
it is a legal military target because of
the base they put underneath it. Now I
would still argue, like I always have, knowing
that there's civilians there, whether or not it's
by design, should be something you avoid.
That should still be a crime as far
as I'm concerned, even though it's used that
way. But the point
is that that is based on their logic,
exactly what the legal reality is. So un
secondarily, there was that big building they claim
was a residential building, which was already been
proven to be housing personnel.
Not the one, I guess, that's recently being
discussed, but there was one from, like, three
days ago we talked about. Right? Where there
was a building that was that they they
did bomb. Apparently, they were even owned it.
But there were reports before about this being
housing personnel, military, or otherwise. Now I said
the same thing. I I I still feel
like that's a crime, and we should call
it out for a rod or anybody else.
But we have to understand that right now,
that's and I could be missing things as
well. I they can't possibly see everything. But
on the other side of it, guys, just
as a simple glance and I don't mean
by just glancing at what you see passing
online. I mean, but glancing is what you
glance through, but then investigate.
By meaning that, you know, you can't possibly
see everything that's out there, it's impossible to
miss
the bombing of the girls the girls school
right out of the gate or the in
continual
targeting of their airports and schools and hospitals.
I don't even think they're denying that at
this point. That's why you get stuff like
this, by the way,
which I'm just jumping ahead slightly.
You get this guy, Walls. Remember this guy?
The one that got caught using an Israeli
intelligence app in the White House,
which I'll include yet again. I still can't
believe that this conversation
didn't get framed for what it really was.
It got everyone was like, the the the
signal gate. Remember that? Well, the real point
was, as you remember, if you watch this
show, and it's look it up for yourself.
It was actually the it they used the
name. TeleMessage is an intelligence connected Israeli app
that archives through signal, and he was using
that on his phone in these internal meetings.
Like, not this is not even the most
important one. Things like in the Oval Office
or inside security briefings.
State department revealed to be using intelligence
Israeli intelligence link chat app
during involved in Trump of admin hack.
And guess what? They didn't get fired. He
got shoved away to go be you know,
to continue to help Israel is the point.
That's who we're talking about.
So here he is
telling you,
Iranians and their proxies hide caches of weapons
in hospitals and schools. We know they do
that.
Oh, okay. So that means bomb every hospital,
every school, apparently. That's what they're doing, even
though I've never actually seen the evidence of
what they're claiming. Doesn't mean it's not true.
Same point about Hamas. They yelled that forever.
I've still yet to actually see them prove
it. I've seen them get caught lying about
that many times. I've also seen Israel,
like, vividly caught literally doing it and then
owning it.
Naver procedure, mosquito pro procedure. Yeah. They this
is those are human shields. They literally got
caught with a guy on the hood of
their car in the middle of summer that
melted his skin, who later went to the
hospital. He got tied to the shield to
protect him. They brought show I mean, guys,
over and over.
And now we wanna hear this as they're
bombing hospitals. It's the same thing. And as
DD Geopolitics points out, there's literally no difference
between the rhetoric now of The US and
Israel. Here they are. CENTCOM has reached its
final form, now issuing statements that sound exactly
like the IDF. The Iranian regime is using
heavily populated civilian areas to conduct military operations,
including launching one way attacks from these locations.
What does that mean? They're targeting those civilian
locations.
I say they're lying
flatly.
I see no evidence to back that up.
I don't even understand why that would make
sense, but it's certainly possible
because you understand. They know where these arguments
are from. They know what they're doing.
And this has gone like, this is why
Iran has planned these things and openly discussed
this in different forums for a long time.
They know what they do. They know their
tactics, which seem to have never changed, and
they've changed. I don't mean change from doing
this, but I just mean, for example, having
those buried locations which nobody can identify. That's
part of the adaption.
Why would they focus on put the look.
Here's the point, guys. And this is what
we always forget to frame I forget to
say in this conversation.
The reason,
classically, the argument they put things in schools,
hospitals, anybody,
is so, one, they get hidden.
And, two,
because the good guys are afraid to bomb
those places because there's civilians there. Right? Well,
that's clearly not the reality. Seeing as how
The US and Israel are basically going well,
they're doing it, so we have to bomb
them. So then why is it happening?
If we know, as we the whole world
can see, that they're not ashamed, they're not
afraid to bomb a a group full of
450 people for somebody that might be there
or to continue to bomb schools and hospitals
because maybe, even though we know they know
they're not there,
then why would they then continue to do
it over there knowing that they're gonna actually
target those locations?
You see my point? It's there's no logic
to everything they're doing. Now that's when it
just falls back on. Well, they're just crazy,
Ryan. Okay.
Sound argument. Like a sod gassing children in
the moments when they needed to do it
to justify their actions, he does it to
give them the excuse. Oh, he's just a
crazy person. Or they lied about it over
and over and over. I mean, Aaron Mate
and plenty of others broke that down extensively
and you it's obvious.
So here we are again. Here we are
again. As we just showed you, they are
quite literally targeting civilian locations everywhere.
Saeed,
Abbas
Araguchi,
who is the foreign minister of Iran. US
committed a blatant and desperate crime by attacking
a freshwater distillation plant in Kasim Island. That's
been reported around the that's I mean, these
are these are right now because it's not
in Gaza. You understand?
These are being worldwide reported. Now, the best
you can do is dispute that you bonded,
that somebody else did. But you can't dispute
these things are being attacked. It's different than
what we were doing before. And it's everyone's
watching.
Water supply in 30 villages has been impacted.
Attacking Iran's infrastructure is a dangerous move with
grave consequences. The US set this precedent, not
Iran.
Everyone can see it. And it like, you
could argue if there wasn't the Gaza situation
before this that they might not they might
be able to hide behind their lives. Not
right now.
It's just not happening.
As Glenn writes, liberating Iranians, especially the young
girls about whom Israel loyalists are so deeply
and authentically concerned
by incinerating their cities,
bombing their elementary schools, poisoning their air, destroying
their freshwater supply, and subjecting them to terror.
That's known as liberation.
You know, Iraq, Libya, Syria style. That's my
whole point.
This person's highlighting they managed to film the,
the Shah Shah,
Shahran oil depot in Western Tehran that was
targeted by air strikes last night, which we're
gonna get into next. They the oil still
seems to be burning. We saw flames coming
from the from, some of the destroyed oil,
storage tanks. Also destroyed tank tanker trucks outside
the gate.
You see how silly this is as they're
talking? Like, there is I I think it's
pretty clear that Israel's driving this to happen,
and that ultimately, we met The US. The
executive branch might not even be dictating what's
happening on the ground, like, through the US
military.
Iran Health Ministry says that 32 civilians were
injured
in a Sitra incident, we're gonna get to
the oil in a second, including four in
serious condition. Among them, children who who required
surgery.
Now officials describe the casualties as a result
of a hostile Iranian drone attack.
However, video and local reporting indicate the homes
were struck by an interceptor missile,
likely a Patriot missile fired by Bahrain air
defenses, which in fact fell on the residential
area after a failed interceptor attempt. Now that
could be a lie too. Just like we've
seen Israel and US lie about the same
thing in reverse and claim Iran's missile fell
on themselves.
The difference is there is video evidence, but
that could be falsified
as well. Be objective and question it. But
what I find interesting is that every time
they make those lies, like the school that
we now know as a fact was their
bomb, or the ones before that. Right? The
one in the the, the,
Drew's population conversation of those kids playing soccer.
That was quite literally one of their missiles
that lobbed up and fell, and I have
it on video. And yet they lied and
said it was somebody else. So it's worth
considering all those things when you get these
narratives again.
Or how there's like, Trump is still telling
you that the school bombing was Iran, and
we know it's not. So here they are
telling you that's Iran to cover the fact
that it seems that they did it to
themselves.
But question it. My point is if you
have evidence that shows something other than what
these videos show or what local people say
or what reports on the ground are telling
you, well, then I'll consider it. Right now,
it's a pretty one-sided story,
but be objective.
Everywhere you look, though, this is how this
is, you know,
clear evidence showing you what's going on, but,
of course, you get the Dinesh D'Souza types
who, by the way, cite vig visregrad twenty
four who has been caught lying. I mean,
probably one of the worst offenders on this
platform, not just about Israel, but will lie
for anything that's in the agenda. So lie
about Venezuela,
lie about and then Elon shares it every
single time. Every time. And they've been caught
lying about bread in Scaza, lying about voting
machines in Venezuela. And, I mean, over and
over and over. And not only does it
not stop getting influenced or promoted, it grows
Because that's what this platform is for. And
Dinesh D'Souza, either is too stupid or doesn't
care. He says that the death to America
people,
meaning, you know, the government who says that
about our government, never considered that America might
return the favor.
You see how crazy this is?
First of all, we're talking about places like
Tehran.
Massive, massive civilian more people than New York
City. That's what we're talking about. These are
the kind of pictures we're being shown. Tehran
right now. And that's supposed to be praiseworthy?
Isn't Dinesh one of the ones telling you
this is not about killing civilians? He's the
same kind of person before telling you, Fighting
Hamas! And then kill all those Palestinians! Acting
like it makes sense.
You're a monster. You're a disgusting human being
if you're pretending that this is somehow justifiable
because some people said death to America? And
even if that's the case, even if all
of them were chanting kill every American,
so you're telling us you're the exact same?
That you're just as gross? You're just as
radical? That you wanna see every every Iranian
killed because some people maybe everyone said that?
You gotta understand these people are showing you
who they are.
And on top of that, guys,
so we're supposed first, again, the death of
America in case you you haven't heard me
say it before.
Listen to the government. They'll tell you right
now. What they mean when they say that
is the US government.
Now maybe they're lying. Sure. But you have
to understand that you Americans are pretty popular
to Iranians. I don't know why. I bring
this up every time. Look it up for
yourself.
I think it's because they all everyone in
the world can see that the governments are
doing this, and most Americans are right now
calling it out.
This guy
is cheering on
the mass indiscriminate bombing of a place larger
than New York City that's being cheered on
by a pro Israel account.
Even though they just told you it was
gonna be limited strikes, about saving Iranians, democracy,
There doesn't there'd be this remember who they
are, guys.
Remember them.
These are the lines where people get exposed,
like this guy.
This this guy was rationalizing the killing of
children right now. The bombing of innocent girls.
The bombing of hospitals and schools because they,
you know, they have things there. Say say
to Israel.
And even if they did, just like Gaza,
it doesn't make it a legal target.
We went over this then, say international lawyers,
the UN,
they didn't care. So here they are using
the same argument even though we know that
doesn't even make it legal.
It's disgusting.
Here's Mossad commentary. You know how often I
point this out?
Hottie catching them? Oy vey.
They write on 20 this was yesterday.
International law violation.
How ridiculous.
Guess what? Another Iran cluster munition ballistic missile,
which I've yet to truly verify, but wouldn't
surprise me. You know why? Because they all
use them.
But, apparently, this is, like, a perfect point
in what I'm always talking about. So here's
what Hadi pointed out first,
that they
said international law doesn't exist.
You're a fake lawyer.
Because that's where they were pushing back on
the international law part about Gaza. Right? That
doesn't exist.
Okay. Funny how now you wanna go international
law. Get Iran.
And even the fact check points it out.
This account has previously stated they don't believe
in international law.
Israel used cluster munitions in its thirteen month
war against Lebanon. You gotta love that.
So these these people are failing
in spectacular fashion,
lying to you every which way you look
at it. Yes. Israel used them, and in
many cases, they're working with The US to
do it.
These people don't care about the truth. Mossad
commentary, the rest, they're just gonna lie to
you. Gonna use whatever tool they can, and
this is the most anti American thing I've
ever seen.
It because it's being done to trick Americans
to kill themselves for this agenda.
Oops. Let me include that for you since
I didn't
add that one.
Oh, shoot. I'm realizing
oh, well. Okay. I just screwed up again,
by the way. I just realized I wasn't
supposed to be closing the tabs because I
forgot to bookmark everything. Well,
apologies for today, guys, because it looks like
most of this isn't saved in the tabs.
So just remember that. My apologies.
So Zionism Observer adds to this, and we
already talked about the Ben Gurion Airport before
this happened.
Now, we weren't the ones that called it.
I forget who's the one that called it
on Twitter, but somebody called it out and
said, Mark this down. When this comes to
pass, remember this. Right? Here they are.
The US Air Force has turned Tel Aviv's
Ben Gurion Air International Airport into an aerial
refueling tanker base
with at least 14, you know, four different
jets and planes and bombs. US Air Force
deployment to Israel comes. The US prepares or
strike on Iran. The video we showed before
was of them showing during the Gaza discussion
bombs being delivered through the airport. Right? Well,
at the same time, right now, we can
show you there's civilian locate civilian traffic in
this airport.
That's a human shield dynamic no matter how
at least the way they would frame it
about any other government they're fighting. And as
Zionist observer points out, calling this guy out
says, hey,
how come you didn't call it human shields
when Israel does it? Because here is
Hamas is probably probably
operating out of towns utilizing resident human shields,
even though that's a guess. Here's an approvable
example, but we don't call it that.
Mark them down.
Now I showed you this yesterday. Just a
quick point. Mario Notfall doing his usual propaganda
push based on whatever people hand in front
of him. IDF dropped a three d animation
showing where Comenity was hiding. It's not true.
It's been disproven even well, here's what's funny.
I believe this is gone now,
of course, because that's what happened on this
platform. There is no more community note because
somebody got removed. But here it is, before
it got removed,
Khomeini was in his office above ground, and
it wasn't this is the case before the
fact check as usual. You could look up
to this for yourself. There's been plenty of
reports about this. You guys, this is my
point. This is not Hamas. This is not
Gaza.
They invent their people on the ground over
there can look at what happened. They can
take pictures of what happened. So what you
get is Israel, yet again, giving you one
of these fake three d graphics telling you
it was some secret deep down hidden monster
terrorist base.
Nope. Nope. It was a civilian location full
of lots of people, rather just not military,
but full of civilians as well. And like
we just showed you, they killed the new
leader's sister, mother,
family.
That's not a legal target no matter what
you wanna say. So
Said also calls it out nonsense. Just, you
know, this was not the reality. This is
sinister propaganda.
Dan Smotes
goes through kind of like the evolution of
the narrative. Right? Iran killed 60,000 other civilians.
No. Wait. They have nukes.
No. Wait. They're built nukes that we destroyed
already. No. Wait. They're going to bomb The
United States now. No. Wait. Israel forced us
actually. No. Wait. We forced Israel's hand. No.
Wait. They did October 7.
Also, it it is and isn't a war.
And if you don't accept that, then you're
an antisemitic terrorist sympathizer.
Perfect. I mean, it just perfectly sums up
how stupid this is and the way people
just go along to get along. Because we
can we're if you're if you're not a
complete dishonest person, this is really embarrassingly obvious.
Now as Higgs has said, and some of
us have pointed out yesterday,
no mention of basically, he says, the only
ones who need to be worried right now
are the Iranians who think they're going to
live. It's It's exactly what he said. I
played it yesterday
as a carpet bomb to run-in front of
everybody. And then you get this regret and
everybody else going, this is what you promised,
FAFO. It's it's just crazy.
Blatant violations of international law. And I think
it's literally about doing it so brazenly that
it gets covered what Israel just did in
Gaza. Because apparently, it's about sacrificing everything American
government people, everything
to support Israel, no matter what. Because that's
America first if you listen to these people.
Because whatever that is is MAGA, that's Trump.
So whatever Trump does is all that. So
shut up and do what you're told.
Freedom, hashtag winning.
They're killing people in broad daylight, and he's
telling you that this is maximum lethality. Punch
them while they're down. He said all of
these things.
I hope he goes to prison because that's
what he's doing. He's openly telling you he's
committing genocide or whatever you wanna call it,
war crimes, ongoing killing of people. That's what
we're talking about. The point is the intent
is a huge part of that.
So as we talked about in regard to
the,
oil bombings and locations,
we read this, yesterday briefly.
And I think I'm not gonna go through
it too deep, but I wanna at least
point it out.
Through, the through it though it is the
daytime, the sun cannot be seen in Tehran.
This was on this is yesterday.
Because all the smoke
flowing following I can't read right now. Following
The US and Israel bombing Tehran's oil refineries.
People on the ground describe it as an
Armageddon.
Body overlap. History will not forgive Reza Pahlavi,
Alinejad,
all the different people pretending to be leaders
of Iran who tricked Iranians into thinking that
this would free them.
Daily Mail shows some of the more horrifying
imagery of the it says Red Crescent warns
Tehran may be submerged
submerged by toxic rain that can cause chemicals,
burn the skin, damage lungs. I mean, this
is this is I mean, think about just
oil alone, but everything else is burning because
of this is like a dioxin situation or
a PFAS thing. People are getting as you
if you would we went over this yesterday.
Actually, I think oh, I think it's in
here. People are getting rashes and getting sick.
It's exactly what we talked about at these
different locations. Conyers, Georgia,
probably by design. The air is unbreathable.
Tehran shrouded in a cloud of toxic smoke
after Israel strikes fuel depots.
Let me see where we're at on time.
So
the fuel depot point is super important because
of the way that they're dealing with this.
Right? Trump promising. Now as we discussed yesterday,
prices went up to, like, 115.
Now last I checked, they were down, like,
90 again. So to a to a point,
he was right. At least to the idea
that they would,
wherever it was, they would oh, the wrong
one. That they would drop really fast. Here
it is. They'd go way down really quickly.
Right? Well, they didn't go way down. They're
up from where they were before, but they
did go down fast. So it's kind of
a mixed lie or rather just half truth.
But at the end of the day, they
still might be going down. But I wanna
point out, guys, that the the reason the
idea that it can go down like that
so dramatically,
they're manipulating this.
Whether that's through, you know, some kind of
dumping a product or flooding it or whatever
else, at the end of the day, that's
not organic. That's not the reality of where
it's gonna end up. So it's just it's
they're just trying to manipulate the situation. And
on top of that, regardless of what the
number shows in the moment, gas prices per
around the country have gone up pretty strongly.
Diesel was I think it's right here. It's
I'm I'm jumping ahead. The point, though, as
we go through
this, is that they're causing this while screaming
about how it's a problem and then targeting
both The US and Israel,
oil installations, oil tankers, which, by the way,
are not legal targets. They're not word they're
not war targets, but they're bombing them anyway,
just like they were right before this started.
Weird how that's consistent, isn't it? Iran's capital
was engulfed in a cloud of toxic smoke
that unleashed
black rainfall
dozens of miles away on Sunday after overnight
Israeli strikes on several fuel depots caused fires
to burn for hours.
Images from Tehran, a city of nearly 10,000,000
people,
showed thick black smoke from the fires hanging
over it, while residents reported difficulty breathing,
oil tainted rainfall staining everything around them. The
rain is black. I can't believe it. I'm
seeing black rain.
It's even it's even in, Tarish, which is
miles away from the oil tanks.
Think about how what what a large disaster
that means. If it's miles away, they're still
raining black.
Says my white car is almost black.
Iran's Red Crescent Society warned residents of Tehran
and the surrounding region that the rainfall after
the strikes could be highly dangerous and acidic
and could cause chemical burns in the skin
and serious damage to the lungs. I get
the worry that something was done alongside this
too. Knowing that this would be, you know,
who knows what they're doing. These are very
dangerous people.
Leah, the 27 year old teacher in Tehran,
said the air was unbreathable.
So So what happened to saving all these
people, guys? Aren't these all the people you
claim you're trying to save from the bad
regime?
No. You're
this is them. You're targeting them, which anyone
can see that's not a blind follower. It's
as if all the cars and the street
pavement have been coated with black paint. It
says today, I wish it it I I
was in the car for fifteen minutes, breathing
this air. I don't even know what it
is, and now I have a headache. The
skin on my face, especially my lips, is
sore and raw. That's crazy. We talked about
this during the dioxin point. If it's that
fast,
you're in danger big time. Like, legitimate danger.
If you're a headache and you already your
skin is reacting
to minutes in the air, that guys, that's
a very serious problem. That's the kinda thing
you're gonna get cancers and problems, like, within
the next years of your life, if not
right away.
We went through this pretty in-depth during the
both Conyers and East Palestine, and the evidence
is overwhelming.
They hide this almost every time when it
happens in The United States.
It says it burns and feels like diluted
tear gas in the air. It irritates my
eyes, and I keep needing to be my
to clear my throat. Now, to be clear,
there are things that can cause that that
wouldn't indicate some kind of serious long term
problem. My point, though, is what we know
was targeted. Oil alone, but all the different
things, the plastics, all things that are everything
is involved with where these are now. It
is going to cause this,
and that means something very serious. Iran state
media reported that the
the Agbesh
oil warehouse in Northeast Tehran,
the Shahran oil depot north of the city,
and an oil refinery in the South,
and an oil depot in Karaj, West Of
Tehran, were all targeted.
You think that's an accident? This is deliberately
trying to cause this problem to then turn
around and blame Tehran is what I would
argue. The Israeli military took responsibility for the
strike saying that on Twitter that it targeted
several fuel storage complexes belonging to the to
the IRGC
in Tehran that it claimed were used to
distribute fuel to multiple military entities in Iran.
Now they're claiming it was you know, we
targeted it because they're saying that because if
it's not what they claimed, that means it's
civilian,
and they know it is. So all they're
saying is they use it to help the
military. You don't think that The US infrastructure
helps the military? So by their logic, they
could bomb every US fuel everything because the
military uses fuel. This is such insane logic.
Now back to the point, despite of the
fact they're claiming the strikes,
watch. And at some point, one of our
ridiculous US politicians tries to argue that your
gas prices are high because of Iran. I'm
willing to bet you that somebody's already said
that somewhere. That's how ridiculous this is. Now
we're gonna get into the fact that they're
not just targeting this, but The US is
too, and that they're acting like that's a
problem.
Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain
death because of Iran's bad behavior are areas
and groups of people that were not considered
for targeting up until this moment in time.
Trump wrote that.
Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain
death.
Because of Iran's bad behavior,
like some school mom,
are areas and groups of people that are
not considered for targeting? I mean, guys, what
is he even talking about? He's talk that's
expanding this beyond military targets because of people
that did certain bad I mean, I don't
even know how you cannot see where we
are right now.
So this is what we're reading earlier.
Destruction is certain death because of Iran's bad
behavior.
Are areas and groups of people that were
not considered for targeting up until this moment
in time. Thank you for your attention.
So what does I mean, that just expands
it to being anything. So you know what
that really does? It opens the it lays
the groundwork, the cover
for being well, anything they just bombed, no
matter how bad it looks, is probably something
he just insinuated.
That's how the MAGA team that's how partisanship
works left to right. That basically well, wink,
wink, he must have. Well, he said there
have seek secret things that we with, you
know, whatever he said because they're bad behavior.
They're groups that weren't real targeted before. So
they're gonna go, well, Trump told you there
are things that wouldn't normally be targeted. They're
now being targeted because, you know, wrong bad
guy. Watch.
Tehran residents reported heavy bombardment
in the city on Saturday.
Tehran.
Tons of residents.
A little over a week into The US
Israeli attack on it killed more than a
thousand civilians according to Time magazine and spiraled
into the regional conflict. A separate theater of
war has been has seen Israel launch a
major attack on Lebanon.
Amazing why that's not a massive issue.
In an attempt to disarm Hezbollah oh, that's
why. Because we're a Hezbollah bad guy. Right?
So we just all ignore the illegality of
everything they're doing. Lebanon's health minister said Sunday
that 394
people have been killed so far in the
conflict, eighty three children among that number.
It's all worth it though, apparently, because bad
guy, Iran's Red Crescent Society also said on
Sunday that about 10,000 civilian structures
across the country have been damaged. It's almost
like they're completely consistent in the way they
conduct war. Bombing everything, targeting everybody, raping, torturing,
killing everybody they possibly can, and then yelling
the word freedom, and apparently it all goes
away. Because Trump said, schools, homes, medical facilities,
every single time I've ever seen Israel involved
in war.
Iran has responded to The US Israeli offensive
by launching a barrage of missiles and drones
toward Israel and Gulf countries that host American
military bases. It has not struck just military
targets, but civilian targets like hotels, airports, and
airport apartment buildings across the region.
Now, even when I was reported on, I
don't under like, most of what they just
highlighted, I don't like, the
civilian targets I I I focused on just
before, those are two clear ones I made
a case about
that we should question and hold them accountable
whether or not there are military targets there.
Right? Because I think targeting civilians regardless is
a crime. And when they say hotels and
airports and apartment buildings, I haven't seen the
evidence of all of those things. And the
reality being that these airports and discussions and
including the one I talked about earlier were
proven to have military personnel. So by your
logic, they're military targets.
But important to include that. Iran's foreign ministry
spokesperson
also said on Twitter that by targeting fuel
depots, the aggressors are releasing hazardous materials and
toxic substances in the air, poisoning civilians, devastating
the environment, and endangering lives on a massive
scale.
On Saturday, as we already reported, they targeted
water, desalination plant. The US set this president
precedent,
not Iran.
Water supply in 30 villages been impacted. Attacking
Iran's infrastructure is a dangerous move with grave
consequences.
Whole world sees this.
Ryan Grim points out US military planners are
reportedly examining options to reopen the Strait Of
Hermos. Any viable solution would likely require heavily
escorted merchant traffic. One model, World War two
style convoy system, commercial ships, ground movement. Oh,
great.
Brian Grooms says, well, how do how about,
I don't know, you know, stopping the bombing?
Maybe? Is that among the any viable solutions
being considered? Clearly not. Then yet again, if
we reload it,
I do I do feel like you can
see a a demonstrated
decrease.
Is that loading?
Oh, it already did?
That was weird. Hold on.
Yeah. Like, so zoom out. Like, it's still
reasonable. There's still shifts, but I based wait.
I've been showing this last, you know, week.
I I think that looks like a very
clear decrease in traffic. So the only reason
I've been saying this over the time is
that we've been getting reports about a massive
decrease in traffic,
and and most people saying they closed the
straight. But by the definition, they did not
close the straight since you can see ships
going back and forth. But they very clearly
did threaten, and that did have a very
clear effect. So the right way to report
this is in effect and has been restricted,
not shut down. So it's frustrating how frivolous
people are at the porting, but
it has clearly I mean, to me, it's
way, way less than I was the last
time I checked. So just did one point
that out because we've been kinda following up
on this. And so what they're saying is
we might have to do something to make
sure we can get through.
And there's a lot more to get into
in that alone. Like, some of these manufacture
rather kind of, like, proper action solution situations
where they're creating something that it opens the
door for them to be able to massively
profit from how they're doing this, but but
we'll get into that in the in the
conversation.
Kuwait, ope OPEC's fifth largest producer said it
has reduced oil and refinery output as an
as unable to export due to the closure
of Cerro Humios.
Now as I said, he came out and
said that the prices will go down very
quickly.
Did that just change?
Oh, it's right there.
They should they basically said in the short
term, they'll go up, but they will go
way down very quickly.
So I wanted to check really quickly on
the
crude oil.
So, yeah, right now at 89.7,
which I I feel what what was it
before this all started? Did somebody possibly remember
that?
I feel like it was lower than that.
I can't remember exactly. But either way, it
went up a bunch and then kind of
resettled. So it's kinda it didn't really go
go day. It just went back, you know,
somewhere around the general point.
But so that was the argument that it's
gonna come back down. We pointed out seeing
Cutter Warren, which did get pretty close. I
mean, right, that pretty $1.15 20 ish. He
claimed $1.50
big deal.
So then Trump then just kind of got
this off. They go up, they go up,
you You know, getting frustrated because here but
here's what I'm getting at with this.
And and as of today,
whether or not we just saw something they
did drop the barrel price that hasn't really
it's right now, gas prices are up. And
as Sager points out, $5.05
dollars a gallon for diesel. He says, we
all learned that, Biden, how diesel prices translate
into massive inflation
for literally any goods that need to be
trucked across the country, and it's up a
lot.
But maybe it goes back down since the
the barrel price did go down, so that
will probably reflect. But it feels
not organic thing either way that just happened.
And so but, you know, who knows? Maybe.
I don't know. Maybe maybe he pulled some
move that makes him an expert on this.
Maybe so. I don't know. At the end
of the day, I wanna get into the
reality of what they're doing and how they're
manipulating this, whether it goes down or not,
which and I'll just say this as I
pointed out yesterday.
Well, another you Trump administration personnel simply telling
you that we're going to seize the oil
from Iran.
Always there,
but that this is going around. I love
the way Michael Crager framed this. Basically, this
is the new two weeks to flatten the
curve or to slow the spread or whatever.
I agree.
That's not the one.
How do I even get that one? Hold
on. Oh, that was I think it was
just from yesterday. That's just an example of
the bombing in Tehran. That is crazy escape.
Tell me that argument, right, if anything.
Like, that's just that's just a pot. That's
the that is what's killing people and hurting
them right now or whatever. I should say
killing, but I would argue that is a
nice telephone.
Poisoning everybody with what they just thought. A
shit.
And more than that, actually, since we saw
that it was miles away from Tehran just
like the other stories we've heard.
Believe it's this one. Disruption
for the long term gain. Short term pain
be for long term gain? We're gonna have
some short term pain,
with long term gain. Short term pay for
a Relentlessly.
Rightly so. The Republicans called out the the
left for doing exactly the same thing relentlessly.
Oh, they're all just the same thing. It's
the same thing.
This is your government. This is how politics
and this fake media works. They get a
talking point, and if you're even remotely paying
attention, you watch it filter through the conversation.
They're just repeating the narrative. That's what they
do. These people are not there because they're
insightful and intelligent, and they're there because they
do what they're told. That's what I believe.
A long term gain. Some short term pain.
Yes. But we've got some long term gain.
Short term spike for a long term gain.
Some short term pain for American consumers. We
may have to deal with that in the
short term. Short term and temporary. Temporary
short term pain. It's gonna suck in the
short term. Some short term pain. Short term
pain. We have to focus on the short
term. Short term. Short term. Short term. Short
term and long term. Short term. That hopefully,
this is a short term pain. Short term
is highly outweighed of the long term benefit.
Some short term
pain for the long term gain. Short term
sacrifice
for a long term gain.
It's just it's so powerful to see that.
That's like that clip of, you know, it's
a threat to our democracy. It's the same
thing.
No difference. Not unique to left or right.
That's the real point. So here they are.
Just telling you to just hunker down. Right?
I know it's just tell like like they
just said, didn't we make fun of the
other side? They're just taking on the chin
for the for the for Ukraine.
It's identical.
Same same thing. Well, I know it's gonna
hurt you a little bit, but just take
it on. It's for but see, the difference
is here, and that's actually better marketing,
is that instead of just taking on the
chin for the team, which is like speaking
to your, like, you know, believing in this
with the team and the country, it's more
about you're gonna benefit from this. Right? Just
it may feel like you're losing now, but
it's gonna get better. Well, didn't we hear
that about tariffs and about less government and
less spending and no more wars and, you
know, just it'll get there.
Just wait it out. Maybe right about 2030,
I think it's all gonna come together. Just
hold on.
Wow.
But it's
people are seeing it. That's what the point.
Iran's nuclear facilities have been obliterated.
Anything else is fake news. Twenty twenty twenty
five. June 25. And, of course, March 8.
Short term, this is where it comes from.
This is what's so perfect. They just repeat.
Short term oil prices, which will drop rapidly
when the destruction of the Iran nuclear threat
is over, is very small price to pay
for US and world safety.
Oh, is that what it is? It's
just this the same old but guess what?
Now it's back to nuclear threat. Funny, I
would just can you pick a lane? Can
you guys just pick an example of what
you're actually trying to accomplish? You I love
when Rubio and the rest of them. We've
made it very clear what we're trying to
do.
Everyone says something different.
That's what they do.
Trump, this is today,
furious at Israel
for destroying Iran oil fields as crude surges.
This is so dumb. This is my point
of, like, Trump going, I don't want the
Kurds involved after they've already done it and
they're armed and they're doing it and it's
happening.
He knows that. Right? This is about him
hoping that that lazy statement, which it works
for some of these blind followers, will be
enough to make people think he didn't do
it. Here, that's my that's my belief. In
this case, what do you mean you're furious
of them doing that? You're involved with this.
You know well what's happening, and this is
always what you guys do. I think this
is about because he knows prices are going
up and people are unhappy, midterms, whatever. And
he has to go, no. Israel, you did
the bad thing.
As if this is this is Alex Jones
going, Trump's bad, but let's support him. It's
the same thing. It's what they do. As
he goes on to continue to support them
and gives them more money and bombs for
them. Yeah. But Israel.
This is so stupid.
Well, guess what? Right after that, they went
on and then the US government bombed, an
oil vessel.
You see how how frustratingly dumb this is?
He Trump goes, oh, you don't do that
because prices. And then the US government bombed
them. Now is that because Trump said that
and then made himself look stupid by ordering
that? Or is he not even in control
of who's dictating the military actions? Because it
offers an important point to think about just
based on that overlap that we're talking about
somebody who's just stood up and said, why
did you borrow those oil installations and and
and tankers and then the US government bombs
a vessel of an oil tanker, which is
a it's a crime. That's not a military
target. And then after that, goes on to
bomb another one.
So here's what's here's the point.
With what we know about them already giving
the commanders the unilateral authority on the ground,
that goes back to his first administration,
or in the the most non,
non the largest nonmilitary bomb, the Moab in
in Afghanistan. It turns out he didn't even
order it. He was eating cake at Mar
A Lago. It was broadly reported Because then
it was clear. He gave them the authority
because I'm not the expert, he said. They
okay. That's crazy. Seeing as how that that
opens the door for a thousand different things
to be manipulated, I'm starting to see why
that actually makes sense because now you might
wonder who's actually dictating these actions. If he's
not delivering that, that means somebody there's a
there's a gap between the executive branch and
the generals, you know, commanding.
Maybe they have influence from somebody else. Maybe
Stephen Miller's in there. Maybe Rubio and all
these other people who are absolutely not fighting
for American interest are dictating what they're doing.
Now just a thought. As always in the
show, I'm not saying that's the reality. Just
considering based on where we are that it
seems to be incongruent.
It's maybe it's just because he's in desperate
and doesn't know what else to do.
They they want you to believe just hours
ago that they were angry with Israel for
destroying oil, and then they bombed an oil
tanker. They constantly lie. I agree.
Oh, and as I said yesterday, oil production
in Iraq has declined by 3,000,000 barrels because
they're engaging in operations there that no one's
talking about.
US, Israeli fighting with PMU, I'm not sure.
It's not really being talked about, but that's
an Iran like an Iranian
ally overlap
that and very important for what I believe
is going to be their ground war against
Iran that's already happening. And 4,300,000
barrels down to 1.3 a day. That's also
having an effect, clearly.
So just to wrap up,
Lebanon
is ongoing. That that was going on long
before this. They violated it thousands of times,
the supposed ceasefire. Craig Murray has called this
out for a very long time. But in
case it matters more to Republican Christians,
the Christians in Lebanon are crying about this,
like crying a foul, like screaming to the
world, help us.
Lebanon Christian villages
along the border are defying Israel's evacuation orders
and refusing to leave.
So they just told everybody in the South
to evacuate, which is not their legal right.
This is not their country.
But they know they're gonna bomb them anyway,
which is a crime. But no one seems
to be able to step in and do
anything about it. Not the US government, not
the UK government, not the United Nations. Nobody
who's, you know, they're all arming and funding
and supporting them, and they're just committing literal
war crimes in broad daylight
using cluster munitions, using I mean, we're gonna
point to that next.
White phosphorus right now, every time.
Christians, and it shouldn't matter more to you
one way or the other based on what
religion they have, if you're a human being
with empathy, but they're in this place, it's
their home, and they're saying we don't wanna
leave. And Israel's beginning to encroach. They're beginning
to bomb. Israel has ordered all residents to
leave. Two hundred and seventeen people have been
killed.
Over 300,000 have been displaced.
The Christian villages they were they're discussing here
are inside this zone. When the order came,
residents of the area,
gathered at their church and rang the bells
in defiance.
I believe there's a terrible cat catastrophe coming
for these people, but it's like everybody else
in Lebanon. I'm hoping that this can somehow
reach the people that need to recognize that
Israel and your government do not care one
way or the other whether they're Christian or
Muslim or Jewish. It it well, I shouldn't
say it like that. There's clear elements that
do. But in the case of what they're
trying to accomplish, whether it's let when it's
Lebanon or anywhere else, look, my point would
be Israel doesn't even care if it's bombing
Jewish people in the places they're trying to
take. We saw that with Gaza. We saw
that with any number of locations, especially not
Christians. But recognize what that truly shows you
that this is about Zionism.
Watch what happens. I hope it doesn't.
But here is, as I showed you before
this even started, March 5. This is
Smotrich
who says we're going to too soon
before this started in Earth the way it
is now. Beirut in Lebanon will look like
con Eunice, and here we go.
So this was so crazy about it. He
can brazenly go on and broadly tell the
world we're about to commit a war crime.
We're about to start bombing a a civilian
location of Lebanon with no declaration of war
or no legal justification and make it look
like a place that we we we also
destroyed and genocided even though we claim that's
not true to the rest of the world,
but I'm gonna proudly tell you we're gonna
do that.
Then days go by, and then they then
US and Israel start doing that. And here
we are.
What are we talking about?
If we can't acknowledge these people are openly
I mean, it just again, shows you the
way the world actually works. They know they
can do it. At least right now, We
can change that.
All you gotta do is care.
Zion Zionism
Zionism Observer
points to honest reporting
who says the Iranian regime is firing cluster
bombs at Israel.
These sub submunitions
break apart mid air.
And maybe so.
And I and I would and I would
argue it's a crime.
That's the reality. No matter who uses these
things, they're considered a crime. And Zionism right
observer rights is more than a million a
lot on his reporting? As Herets reported, IDF
commander, we fired more than a million cluster
bombs in Lebanon.
Yeah. Both should matter, but it's funny how
these groups tend to only focus on one
side of the conversation and often tend to
cite false information coming from Israel about the
people they're finding.
In this case, Craig Murray also points out
Israel has dropped over a million cluster bombs.
He's a journalist. You should listen to what
he has to say. Don't blindly take it
face value, but consider what he has to
say. This is Mario doing the same thing.
Iran firing cluster munitions because Israel says. Israel
says. My god. How embarrassing.
Well, here's a report from 2018.
Banned weapons used in all US war theaters.
In all post nine eleven wars, US has
used banned chemicals, biological, radiological, incendiary, and cluster
munitions. Every single one of them. It's not
hard to prove. Here's the intercept. Just from
2026,
Pentagon makes largest known arms purchase
from Israel
for banned cluster munitions.
How crazy is this?
It's changing, though. I'm telling you. Mohammed Safa
points out while they're screaming about other things,
Israel deliberately bombed the UN peacekeepers in Lebanon.
This violates international humanitarian law, Geneva conventions, Rome
statute, 1994 convention, the UN Charter of Security
Council mandates Israel's impunity must end.
I agree.
Israel drone strikes hit hits hotel in Central
Beirut.
So a lot of this is what I
wanna think about in this. Well, first of
all,
we know they're targeting civilians. It's pretty easy
to prove.
The thing I want you to consider is
that if we're seeing we know they all
have drone strikes. Is that we've already seen
a Sky News report that there was a
bombing from a drone that they blamed on
Iran that looks like it came from Israel.
So I want you to consider whether some
of these other locations you're seeing, especially and
I think that's why they did this more
than anything now that Israel sort of pulled
back, at least it claims, from bombing the
other entities other than US and Israel locations
that anything else happens, it very well could
be them doing it to create that situation.
Netanyahu warns of disastrous consequences if Lebanon's government
does not disarm Hezbollah.
In the midst of a genocide on Gaza
and an ongoing war against Iran that you've
driven The US to fight for you, You're
now just continue you're going, you too, Lebanon.
Just this is a desperate effort, I think,
to get this done in a moment where
they think they've got no I don't think
Netanyahu thinks he's ever gonna have another opportunity.
That's what it feels like to me.
And that's not just my opinion based on
a lot of things, political and otherwise. That
might be the reality for him. Israeli airstrikes
hit the Ain Al Hilway Palestinian
refugee camp in Lebanon.
Think about how gross this is. Let they're
bombing Lebanon, which is also a crime, but
also just decided to target the Palestinians that
managed to flee
and end up in Lebanon who were safe,
but now they bomb them in the safe
camp in Lebanon, killing lots of people.
If you needed one example to understand who
these people are, it's right there. They will
go out of their way, commit a secondary
illegal war to murder Palestinians that happened to
get away.
Israel strikes and killed 394
in Lebanon in one week, including 83 children.
Mohammed Safa, UN diplomat,
Israel bombed Lebanon with banned phosphorus munitions,
Violating Security Council resolution, ceasefire agreements, and international
law. This is another war crime. Nobody cares.
I mean, it's quite obvious, guys. The in
in daylight, which is the only way they
even pretend it's legal is to signal.
In daylight, there's no possible reason for that.
At the end of the day, it's shouldn't
be illegal no matter what. They abuse that
that manipulation all the damn time.
And in case you haven't seen these,
I mean, it's so wildly proven.
Just going back to 2023, Israel white phosphorus
used in Gaza, Lebanon.
Where was that? Let's see.
Also interesting about the new the defense authorization,
you know, for phosphorus,
which is more about fertilizer obviously, but it's
interesting.
I thought I had more of those popping
up. Oops. That's why.
I swear I had, like, five more things
that would pop up my URL. But, anyway,
let's just do this real quick.
I bet you I get, like, six articles.
US admits using white phosphorus in Fallujah. Pentagon's
recommended
giving white phosphorus.
White phosphorus used against the Islamic State.
White phosphorus I mean, guys, it's just so
pathetically still I mean, come on. Really? Now
we're gonna let sit there and let them
scream everybody is real about, oh my god.
White and I look. How how about we
wanna find out what about cluster munitions or
white phosphorus? Same point that not only have
they used it everywhere in every war, but
I question whether you're actually seeing it used
by the other side. Not because they're not
capable or they wouldn't be feel justified because
it's being done to them, but because it's
obvious that my entire time covering this, they
have tried,
and you can see it, to not take
the easy path, not meet them at the
low hanging fruit, not drop to their level,
Show restraint.
But maybe it's maybe they've driven them too
far. That wouldn't surprise me at this point.
But just for crying out loud,
so many examples of them doing this, and
it's not some hypothetical.
Oh, yeah. I guess it's not in there
anyway.
So, lastly,
Trump tells CNN he's not worried about that
Iran with a democratic state. You know, that
was, like, three days ago, guys. We're not
talking about freedom anymore. We're talking about Israel's
money and, you know, us taking over and
balkanizing the Iranian area for freedom though, for
oil, whatever else. What what did we say
yesterday that whatever. Something new.
How quickly you can change the story?
The whole the whole thing was about freedom.
Even the Democrats came on board. Freedom and
democracy because they're always on the same side
when it comes to war in Israel.
And you you go, well, as long as
somebody gets in that I like, which we
already told you.
These people are exactly what they claim they're
not. They're showing you with every single action
they take.
Trump tells CNN freedom for Iranians isn't the
goal. He'd accept any leader, even a religious
one, as long as they're fair to Iranians?
No. No. To The US, it is real.
And you can listen to it. It's a
clip. We already played this partly today.
I mean, so now the entire thing is
whether you give us what we want, well,
exactly
like with Venezuela like we just showed you
because that's what this has always been about.
And, of course,
Adam pointing out, it could last six days,
six weeks, I doubt six months. Donald Rumsfeld,
Iraq war.
Same old thing, guys.
And I'll I'll I'll I'll I won't play
this now. I'm just gonna get to the
end clip, but this is CNN showing a
side by side of the Iraq war versus
today, which I hate CNN too. It doesn't
change the fact that it's provable. It's it's
embarrassing how clear it is.
Thomas Massey points out Mike Johnson saying this
this is not a war. I think it
says,
we have no intentions of being at war.
And he says, excuse me. This is war.
Even those in favor of it will admit
as much, which is the point. Right? Tons
of these people are like, yeah. Go to
war with Iran, and they love it. So
this is just so grossly dishonest.
John Fetterman,
this whatever you wanna call this guy comes
out and goes, why do Democrats now universally
condemn what achieves the top long standing Democrat
party? He always does this because I don't
think he's smart to realize what he's not
what he's doing, which is exactly what I'm
trying to show people. Yes, John. We get
it. You're all the same. All of them
do the same things when it comes to
war in Israel and most other things too,
but thank you for not realizing how you
stepped in that. It's clear that whether you're
left or right, that they support Israel and
the war. But But guess what's even more
funny about this and funnier?
Now that you universally condemn,
where who are you talking about, man? Where
are we pointing? Because as far as I
can see, all of them support this for
the most part. They a lot of them
give lip service to things bad, but then
support it. Vote for it.
Here's mister Democrat, Bill Maher, Maher, saying, if
you expect me to say I hate it,
I don't. I know too many happy Iranians.
Always been this that's mark it down.
He has always been one. Always.
Where it matters pulls the punch, guys. This
is about you know too many happy Iranian
Americans? What a stupidly subjective view. Like like
you happen to know the pro he knows
all the Shah people that have been introduced
to him by the government. You know, it's,
like, it's just embarrassing. It's also simply not
the reality of what most Iranians want, and
the whole world is proving that right now.
Here's Ro Khanna
calling out Democrats trying to have it both
ways on Iran, opposing war publicly while still
voting to fund it. You see, that's my
point. I think this is the the the
part that this weird, like, fake Democrat, pro
Republican, Democrat guy, Vetterman, does is plays this
role. I don't I think people just hand
him things to say. I don't even know.
I can't see a world in which this
guy constructs anything that he says.
But the
point is that at the end of the
day, they do support it everywhere.
And that's an effort to get you to
somehow think that they're divided on it, when
in reality, it's not because they need the
two party paradigm to zombie forward somehow.
But we're gonna wrap it there with a
clip to end, guys.
Not too much longer than usual. Four four
and a half hours. That's just not too
bad. So I I based on the
schedule from the next week, tomorrow's deal of
Tuesday, so I'll be doing that, but I'm
probably gonna leave it there for tomorrow unless
something large happens. So I'll let you know.
But,
you know, I mean, you tell me, guys.
I'd like to think this is about as
clear as it gets
with a lot of the stuff we're talking
about. It's just about kinda trying to put
aside, like, just, like, stop even. The two
party dynamic is just falling apart right now,
and these people looking more obvious than I've
ever seen them.
But whether you agree with me or not,
I just, you know, go back to basics.
Look at the facts, what you can prove.
Everything else is irrelevant at this point. I
shouldn't say relevant, but just, you know, in
the moment of deciding what you think is
happening. If it's not about what you can
prove and, you know, consider different opinions. But
when it comes to this, you have to
brace base it on what you know you
can prove, especially with so much nonsense going
around. Like deliberately watering it down with things
that hide the truth.
I think it's pretty obvious it's about what
Israel wants to accomplish through this. And you
get these people that have been starting to
scream about America First that are coming out
and doing things that are, I mean,
antithetical, like the opposite of anything that was
ever about America first.
And somehow,
the
the team still supports it. I know you
know what that shows you. Help me call
it out.
But thank you for tuning in. I love
you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars
in their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly,
and in their leadership,
they are inveterate
liars. Let me say that again. They are
liars.
United States military began
major combat
operations
in Iran. He's a peace peace monger, not
a warmonger. It's up to the Iraqi people
or I'm sorry. The Iranian people to choose
their next their next leader. There's a lot
of confusion about president Trump's peacekeeping bombing campaign
in The Middle East. Well, I've been watching
Fox News for three hundred and sixteen hours
straight, and I'm ready to Foxsplain America's very
well defined mission in Iraq.
Iraq. Iraq.
We may have casualties that often happens in
war. I don't know if this is technically
a war. Strategic strikes are not war. Nobody
should classify this as war. It is combat
operations. This is not war. It's a dairy
free war like alternative. We are at not
war with not Iraq. How can I make
this clearer? Frankly, it doesn't matter what you
call it because the president has a very
strict deadline for this war. It could end
in two or three days, said the president.
It could last, two or three weeks. This
operation could last four weeks or less. We
could say four weeks, but it could be
six. It could be eight. It could be
three. It could be nine. It could be
six seven. It could be eight six seven
five three zero nine. The point is it's
not gonna be a forever war. No one
is saying that. Trump's saying today, wars can
be fought forever. Yes. Wars can be fought
forever.
I mean, isn't it refreshing to hear a
man make that kind of commitment in 2026?
This is what we voted for, a president
who will transparently tell you that we could
be entering an inescapable quagmire.
President Trump will fight until we win no
matter how long it takes. We've already won.
We've already won. In many ways, we've already
won. Like I said, we already won. Mission
accomplished.
This is progress, people. It took months for
George Bush to prematurely declare victory. President Trump
did it in days. Besides, it's not up
to us. It's up to the Iranian people.
There's no question that Iraq or Iran Iran
clearly fits in that picture. Are you sure
these are different countries? Like, maybe Iraq is
like Aloha and it could be Iraq or
Iran? But whoever we're bombing, we're winning because
when president Trump starts a war, he wins
the war even when he didn't start the
war. We didn't start this war, but under
president Trump, we are finishing it. Iran has
been at war with The United States for
forty seven years. Iranians have been at war
with us since 1979.
This didn't start on Saturday. Donald Trump promised
no new wars, and this one doesn't count
because, as we all know, it started in
1979.
Look, Donald the Peace president Trump wouldn't get
us into not war for no reason. It
was based on very hard conclusive evidence. It
was my opinion that they were gonna attack
first. They were going to attack if we
didn't do it. The president's feeling based on
fact that Iran does pose an imminent indirect
threat. It wasn't just a feeling. It was
based on a fact. It was more than
a feeling.
Here's the truth bomb. Sometimes you have to
start a war to prevent a war that
was already a war that's technically not even
a war.
Come on, people. So everyone relax. This administration
knows exactly what they're doing in Iraq. Not
Iraq, of course. I mean, Iraq. Iraq. Iraq.