Elites were
Trump, right? I'm a never Trump guy. I
never liked him. And I've I've I've but
I've noticed,
this willingness from people who think a lot
like I do that, look, we told you
so. To all these white working class voters,
we told you so. We told you that
Trump was going to be a terrible candidate.
We told you that you were an idiot
if you voted for him. The problem is,
if you take that attitude of sort of
gloating over Trump's defeat, then you're playing into
the very
thing that gave rise to Trump in the
first place, which is a feeling that the
elites think that they're smarter than you and
just think you're a bunch of idiots.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 03/06/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
That clip is quite interesting, isn't it? We
played that before.
Well, I think actually a different version or
a different example or location since he's made
that statement or variation of those statements many
times. But it's an interesting clip to listen
to now
after everything.
And if you didn't kinda catch the point
in there,
if you listen to what he said, it's
kind of he's
the framing of the way he said that
suggests that he's one of those,
that he's one of the elitists. Right? Because
well, we can't do that because then it
gives them the reason to say that we're
that way. It's like, that's interesting and fits
into exactly one of the things we're gonna
talk about today that that is the reality
of the situation. That all these people have
been trying to warn you away from these,
rightly so, these larger global entities
and ultimately are now cheering on whether they
know it or not, that exact thing, either
taking control of or a part of the
influence through Donald Trump's administration. And if you
haven't been paying attention to this show, it
is not unique to Donald Trump's administration,
and it's not unique to left or right.
But it's important to see that. How do
you ignore something like that? And maybe one
of them okay. Maybe he just came to
and realized Trump was great. Well, Rubio
and Gabbard and Musk and everybody else. You'll
find those videos are the same thing for
all of them. It's very interesting. And I'm
hoping it's not about trying to, like, dunk
on anybody, which which is kind of the
thing that's going on in the partisanship every
day. It's about trying to reach the people
who need to see that, to say, come
along to the side that is aware of
the re you know, absurdity of all of
the two party illusion.
Recognize that they're lying to you. That's the
point. Not to not laugh at anybody, but
try to bring people into the reality of
the situation.
So today, in general, what we're gonna get
into, as the image and title suggest,
is an interesting development from HEGSETH about the
greater North America statement. As a as a
the picture I used, I think was you
know, it I think it speaks for itself.
It I mean, I maybe save for some
small deviations. What they're pointing to is essentially
just
a Technate.
Now, sure, sure, that could just be a
coincidence. Maybe it's just a similar overlap to
an agenda that they have that relate to
the same kind of landmass.
Either way, you can't miss how many times
this continues to come into play. Greenland and
Panama and, I mean, every single aspect of
this and what that larger point connects to.
Now whether you agree with what that means,
if you understand where I'm going with that
in regard to technocracy and what we've been
discussing,
it's still important to understand the what it
shows about the lack of,
I guess, respect
for law, international, domestic, or otherwise,
and and realizing that all of the moves
that are involved with this point are about
showing you that, changing that understanding, our relationship
with all of those things.
And
it's becoming very, very clear.
Now on top of that, what we're gonna
get into is the Iran updates as usual,
because it's an ongoing point. And if you
don't remember how we've done this in the
past or you're new to the show, when
there's a major event like this, you know,
it it it always because it's the nonstop
twenty four news cycle, it tends to consume
the conversation. And so I like with COVID
or anything else, I I imagine this is
gonna continue. It will be a central part
of the show as long as that goes
on until I decide maybe it's you know,
even today, for example. I just felt the
need to make sure we included some a
lot of other things to discuss, which is
why the show is gonna be quite a
big one, I imagine. It's like I can
try to make it go fast,
but then ultimately, I wanted to include some
of these other points that are getting missed
every day because of what's going on. And
and it's not like that's unimportant. This is
monumentally important for the world. And it relates
to one or the other, and if not
the, most important topic in the world, which
is the ongoing genocide.
It all ties in together.
But my point in saying that is that
we will continue to discuss Iran. You can
come to this show, if not, you know,
the five days a week that we're aiming
to do the show right now, and and
be updated on what's going on as much
as I can see. And I try to
include
everything, as much as I can grab that
I find is important. There's no real limitations
to what I look into. It's just whatever
I think is relevant to the conversation. And
that's a big thing to take a bite
of. And I maybe didn't realize that when
I first started the show, but it's it's
been important to do it that way because
there's so many things that connect to everything.
And as well, you guys all see. We're
also gonna talk about the start, actually, as
I frame just wet worst MAGA day yet.
And I'm telling you guys, I've been following
this pretty closely, and I've been keeping you
apprised of the situation. And I'm sure everyone
I mean, it's a mainstream topic today. As
much as they're trying to throw out these
ridiculous claims of 98%
of support, whatever Trump said, it's just it's
just it's embarrassing because that's
it's objectively false.
Because you can see the major turn, but
you don't have to make that point every
day. The reality is a lot of honest
people in this conversation in the partisanship, conservatives,
are very upset.
Lines have been crossed. And so what I
wanna point out to it's just this one
day where we've been hover covering so many
different things that are changing. They're obvious, but
this over I mean, it's really I I
wanna just say a twenty four hour period,
but kind of over yesterday and today.
It has been unreal how many things all
at once have happened, and you might not
even seen them all. Some of them are
somewhat small points in a larger conversation, but
major deviations from what was promised.
Major immigration stuff.
I mean, we'll we'll get to it right
out of the gate. It it it's it's
incredible, guys. And I just and I'm the
reason I think it's so important, not only
that they're obvious and they're lying and you
can see it, but as I keep showing
you, that's why I started like that. The
people that are around me, or I keep
telling you anyway, that I see trapped in
that are moment to moment pulling further away
from it. Seeing these things now and going,
yep. Yep. I get it. That's, you know,
that's clearly not. Not as opposed to the
moments ago where it was like, well, I'm
sure he has a reason.
You see the difference there? You could someone
will always make a justification, but there's something
that has changed. Right? And that's happening everywhere,
and it is a pretty incredible point. But,
obviously, a lot more to get into to
connect on top of that. We're gonna follow-up
on the,
the, Minab School that was bombed as as
I mean, again, it was clear. The evidence
was clear that first day. I mean, based
on everything I could see. I wouldn't call
it proven that first day, but it was
very clear how they were trying to lie
about it. But every day since, it's gotten
more clear to the point now where US
intelligence, US sources are saying pretty much was
the US government, as well as Israel basically
throwing them under the bus already, by the
way.
Greatest ally. But we're also gonna talk about
the ship that was bombed from a US
submarine in a naval exercise and why that
was a crime.
It's it's it all way these things are
always so contentious because you get the overwhelming
partisan pushback about anything, which, by the way,
I don't know why we'd even get consider
what they're saying. But we know that every
time something like this happens, whether or not
they know the truth, they'll bull rush over
the top to yell about what they want
you to hear. And then almost every time,
it turns out to be somewhat different. So
just recognize that that when you get these
people that are forcefully yelling how dumb you
are because you don't recognize, when's it ever
been a crime to bomb a ship in
wartime? Well, there's a whole lot more nuance
to that. You know? Maybe like they didn't
declare war, neither side, in fact, and what
they didn't begin with is illegal to this
point going forward. It's undeniable.
I mean, you know, and and that changes
the whole conversation or the points of the
Geneva Conventions and a lot we'll get into.
But if you think it's clear based on
what everyone's saying I mean, I I I
would argue it's reasonably clear to understand what
happened, but the way that they're muddying the
waters around it, it's important to understand because
not everybody knows the nuance about, you know,
the War Powers Act and what they did
around this, the constitutionality
of declaring war currently. I mean, there's major
people making,
like, just strong arguments completely
disconnected from the constitution
that, well, you know, things have changed. That
just presidents don't do that anymore. That's just
how it's been so long.
Yeah. We all see that, but did we
vote on that? Is there any legislation that's
been passed? Have we decided we no longer
care about the constitution? Well, kind of, kind
of unspoken in certain groups, but most Americans
still want to care about that or still
do. And so we're at a point now
where they're just kinda going, well, it's changed.
We don't have to declare war. We can
just do what we want because we you
guys have passively let that happen is kind
of the point. So we're gonna get into
that again today, but I'm gonna point to
or in fact, I think it might be
pinned still. So I might have forgot to
pin the show today, but, Jace, Jason Bassett
put out a great clip compilation of the
show just discussing why this is illegal. The
actions against Iran, how it started, just very
clear.
Now that might that's different than you agreeing
with why it might need to happen.
Yeah. You can those things can exist. You
can argue that this should be happening, but
at the same time, it started out in
a legal
way. And and, hey, so too did many
of the past administrations. I'll agree with that.
But don't we wanna kinda just go, well,
let's just stop breaking the law, stop blaming
the other side to keep it going forever
when you stand back and realize that both
sides take advantage of that and then it
never goes away? You know you know how
it goes. But plenty more to get into.
So let's start with,
as always, the clip here
for you guys to see.
Donald j Trump, Trump e Trumpstein or Trump.
Yeah. Just Trumpstein, like Trump Epstein with the
picture of him mashed with him and Trump,
Epstein and Trump together. Shared that clip.
And here is another graphic that went along
with it just, you know, in case you
missed the clip and you wanted just the
idea of this. It's just so crazy to
me. And these are all you most of
you just said in that clip. Things JD
Vance has said about Trump. I'm never I'm
a never Trump guy.
Never liked him. Terrible candidate. Idi if you
voted for him. Americans America's Hitler.
Isn't that funny? Because now he's telling you
that's somehow, like, a you know, call to
violence and they're attacking him for it. It's
just the absurdity of where we are in
this country the government, rather. Cynical a hole,
obnoxious, reprehensible, cultural heroine. So, yeah. Maybe he
changed his mind, but you have to acknowledge
that those things are there and that's a
pretty hard turn.
So the reality is clearly, if we're gonna
be honest, that he just decided this was
in his interest. Those things don't matter, guys.
That's politics.
Enemies work together all the time in politics.
That's how this works.
Then he if you listen to him, he
told you what he thought a long time
ago. Now I wanna start actually with this
clip. I wasn't planning on it, but somebody
had sent this to me, and we started
with this clip the last show, which was
jarring, shocking.
The the
veteran who had his arm broken
in a hearing or in a congressional,
briefing. And he basically or not briefing, but,
you know, I guess it would be hearing.
He was in there protesting or he's a
marine. He was in there. He stood up
and he said, we won't die for Israel.
And they dragged him out of there. And
as I understand it, even if one of
the congressmen got involved,
and and they broke his arm because he
got caught in an ar in a doorway.
I wanted you to hear what the what
Anthony Aguilar has to say. Somebody recently asked
me if I'd be willing to interview him.
I'd love to. So connect that. You know,
let him let him know I'm down. We
DM me. I'm I'm I've been promoting his
works at the moment I saw him. And
And important to understand
here that this is it's just showing one
of those moments of hypocrisy,
of people that are acting like we care
about the you know, marines and or rather
just, you know, military and stand by the
troops. And in the moment that it's not
something one of them does something you disagree
with, In case you haven't realized, guys, there's
people in the military on all sides of
discussions, including those that disagree with what the
government's doing. I know that's hard for you
to understand.
And the reality being that they have a
right to say it. That's also free speech.
Don't we all agree? Except the people that
are liars. You know, the ones like Loomer
that come out and scream, do we care
about it? And then go, oh, but he's
a Muslim or he married a Muslim woman,
so then we don't care. Right. Because she's
a disgusting person and are showing you what
they actually are.
You know, sort of like pretending that we're
actually we're we're fighting Hamas, not all Palestinians,
and then going on to make every point
clear that all of them are disgusting. They're
liars, guys, and they're actively doing this for
something else other than US interests. So I
want you to hear what Anthony has to
say, another veteran who she also called out
because he dared to tell the truth about
what her favorite country is doing in the
world.
And he was there. He told you. Remember,
he was the one that told you they
were killing children at the food lines working
with ISIS gangs. And they don't nobody cared,
at least in the people that may be
able to do something about it. So he
put this video out. I'm not gonna listen
to all of it. It's about five minutes,
but I want you to hear what he
said. And it's crazy that this guy, apparently,
after being taken, nobody can talk to him.
Not the family. Nobody. There's some this is
the government that we've always had, but whatever
Trump and his administration are doing is simply
showing you that.
I mean, this they're not even trying to
justify this.
If he's arrested, then why is he being
held away from everybody? Why is he not
being able to talk to his family? What's
going on? Because we're living in this moment
of
authoritarian crackdown, guys. What look at what they're
doing with ICE. Look at what did they
give you any
barely acceptable justification? Or either one you claim
is and it's not, like most of what
they're saying with ICE, and they just act
they just bull rush over everybody.
So listen to what he has to say,
guys, and this is chilling for where we
are in this country. And this is a
marine.
Guess we'll start we'll start with that today.
Damn certain I had that. Let me grab
that video for you real quick.
And, again, while I'm grabbing this to remember
that in case you didn't hear what I
said before in regard to the
the fake food, you know, the the what
was the name of the group actually in
in where they set up the fell the
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,
which was just an ISIS link gang basically
running a
a a psyop to kill people in Gaza,
and that he
aggressively called that out.
Guess it didn't matter. First hand witness and
a veteran. You know what I mean? Like,
it's doesn't mean he can't lie, but clearly
it matters. So here's what he had to
say about this.
Hello, everyone.
I'm Anthony Aguilar. I'm a retired US army
officer.
Today is Friday, March 6. It's about 02:30
in the afternoon.
On Wednesday, March 4, many of you witnessed
either in person or saw across social media
the arrest
of marine corps combat veteran and firefighter
Brian McGinnis.
Brian McGinnis is not only a marine corps
veteran who served in combat, who is also
a firefighter who has dedicated his entire life
to serving the community and our nation. He
is a father.
He is a husband.
He was detained on Wednesday at approximately 03:00
in the afternoon
from the Hart Senate Building.
Since then,
no one has been able to speak to
him.
His lawyer
has been unable to speak to him
both. I
mean, just think about that.
In what world is that ever the reality,
guys?
Right? I mean, where where where you at,
Lumer? Are you gonna say it's okay that
they just don't give allow his lawyer to
speak to him? Would you if if that
was in Russia
or Iran, would you be screaming about why
that's unprecedented and has to be taken? I
mean, come on, guys. There's just no excuse
for this. What they're doing is showing you
who they actually are. They every single action
in this country right now is screaming in
the direction of everything we've always said we
are fighting.
Everything.
His court appointed lawyer and his hired attorney.
His wife has not been able to speak
to him. No one in his campaign camp
has been able to speak to him.
The Capitol Police will not allow anyone to
speak to him. We don't even know what
hospital he's been admitted to, and he is
admitted under an alias.
He has sustained a serious
injury. Why would that be?
Regardless on your stance on his protest,
regardless of your stance on the war with
Iran,
this is a veteran.
This is a man who has served his
country and his community for his entire adult
life.
And and whether or not he has,
you know, opinions where he that he that
he protests for that you disagree with.
Don't we always pretend that that's what this
country is great for? That you're allowed to
unless it's that opinion, unless you wear that
scarf, but then you're just not allowed. Yeah.
You guys are disgusting hypocrites, and the world
knows it. The country knows it. I'm just
I'm actually very happy to feel that I
think that's very obvious today. Obviously, I don't
I can't I don't know that for sure.
That's why I said it that way.
But come on, guys. The right the world
is seeing what they are. I'm seeing major
Republican people call out Loomer for being disgusting.
I'm glad to see it, guys. It just
shows you that we've all we've been gaslit
by those kind of people, and it's at
least there's an opening at least for that
to change.
The injuries he sustained are quite serious.
The doctor that's gonna be performing the surgery
did contact his wife to give her an
update on the surgery,
but would not allow her to speak to
him, and no one's been able to see
him or speak to him.
The injuries that he sustained are a fracture
to the radius
and the ulna.
The loud crack you heard in the video
when Brian's arm was snapped in between the
two doors
broke his forearm.
This injury will take time to recover, and
the surgery
will be immense.
I'm not asking for donations.
I'm not asking for,
social media posts. What I'm asking for is
everyone
to please take action and demand
that the Capitol Police and the US Senate
allow for Brian's family
to communicate with him,
especially as he goes into surgery and comes
out of surgery.
We don't know what the official charges are.
He does have a
alleged charge sheet,
but he has not yet been arraigned nor
gone before a judge.
All charges would be speculation.
We do know what his injuries are.
Other than that, we do not know his
status,
his mental status, his emotional status. He's not
been able to speak to anybody.
I'm calling on senator Tom Tillis of North
Carolina.
I'm calling on senator Ted Budd of North
Carolina.
I'm calling on congresswoman
representative Deborah Ross of North Carolina District 2.
I'm calling on all veterans,
marine corps and services,
and firefighters
to please take action,
notify these congressmen and senators,
take action
in bringing awareness to this.
Brian serves his country in uniform
as a marine in combat.
And since as a active duty firefighter, he
has put his life on the line for
his community in this country every day of
his profession.
So it's just disheartening to see the kind
of way people respond. And it's important to
understand, guys. I know this is what's being
said online, but it's not accurate. It is
not illegal to protest in your uniform. It
is prohibited by the military, but it's not
illegal. It's not a crime. It's not it's
constitutional for you to do that. And that's
that's an openly stated reality. That's not just
my nuanced opinion. The insult for very important
to understand, guys, that constitutional
is what matters. The government could make laws
all day long that say national security supersede.
It does not, though. And they'll sure as
hell enforce that at the barrel of a
gun. Doesn't mean that it's illegal or constitutional.
Always very important to understand that. I mean,
feel free to look it up for yourselves,
guys. And so with the either the the
end of the day, that being the core
point, as you you can go out there
as an American citizen and protest for whatever
you want whenever you want because that is
your constitutional right.
Now you you could even take this further
and argue, oh, you but you can't do
it in this restricted area. Well, fine. You
can say that and maybe you'll enforce that.
I don't agree that that's constitutional, wherever it
is. But you see, this is where we've
gotten so, you know, fire in the theater
and waiting just one after one, and it's
logical. Right? Oh, you can't do that. You're
disrupting this. And people go, okay. You know?
And it makes sense.
But you get what I'm saying? Like, we've
long been kicked down this road. It's time
for us to start pulling back and start
digging in, you know, going back to the
basics, right, to the core point here.
Now this just makes me sick, guys.
And Laura Loomer seems to be like this
like, she basically is the one that's pretending
like she discovered that this person's married to
a Muslim, like it was some bombshell, and
she's been screaming about it. Like, it me
it wasn't secret. He posts about it. It's
his life. He's not even hiding that. And
and he does activism. He's out there speaking
about these things, standing up for for Palestine.
I mean, it's kinda crazy to me that
anybody can be framed as the the the
wrong headed one in any conversation where you're
taking the side against the genocide. But, I
guess, that's Laura Loomer for you. But the
point is that they're making her out to
be bad because she's Muslim and that he's
married to her, therefore, he bad. You know?
Bad guy Muslim, bad guy Iran. Just simple
kindergarten level stupidity.
But, you know, it it doesn't even need
to go any further than that. And here
and this person, this is the guy who
got his arm snapped today. His wife's in
a hijab. Water watermelon slice on her on
her or whatever. Okay. So what?
Even if you think that means the worst
thing in the world, does that then invalidate
his rights? These people are showing you who
they really are. They don't care about and
most of them are people whether bots or
not. You should consider that. They don't care
about anything.
Anything. It's about projecting what you what they
want people to it's like it's like Trump
or Vance. Same thing. Vance didn't he hated
Trump or at least maybe that was the
lie. The point is they'll do what they
need to do to get where they need
to go.
Average people, most of them are argue care
about principles, have integrity of some things, lines
they care about.
These people are willing to go, I don't
care. Constitution doesn't matter because that guy says
things I don't agree with. So you're just
like the Democrats you so loathe.
And Blakely says, so the MAGA line seems
to be it's okay to assault a US
Marine Corps veteran who's assaulted who was assaulted
by an Israel first traitor because his wife
is Muslim? And that's the case. I forget
his name off the top of my head
in the chat. Pop it in there so
I can say it. Forgot his name. The
senator that was basically a part of that
in in rushing I mean, the whole thing
just makes me sick.
Oh, let's get into the worst day for
Mag because this is super important, I think.
You already saw this. I talked about it.
Sinister Trump plot to steal GOP rebel staff
revealed. You have the example of Cash Patel
threatening them as well before this, saying you
better play ball.
If you read the article we went over
in the last show,
they're threatening or rather trying to poach his
team because they don't want the Epstein files
to come out. They've been
clearly,
one of the 17 times they tried to
drag their feet on this, didn't happen.
Also, don't miss this. I'm sure we'll go
deeper on this as it develops. So we've
talked about this since this first came out.
We've talked about this before the Epstein Transparency
Act, the reality
of the Zorro Ranch, the reality of what
went down, the reality post the
well, in fact, if I remember correctly,
that document was out, but it was, you
know, disputed. This comes out with the Epstein
Transparency Act where it's got the list of
the different videos that were sent to, I
forget his name, but the republican commentator
and said, look. This is all evidence. I
worked there. I've been there. They buried these
women in the in the ground.
And then the
representative from New Mexico,
this is all off the top of my
head because I'm including just a couple quick
things, but, well, last year, I went over
it. I forget her name off the top
of my head. She was saying I investigated
or I called this out in 2019. Nobody
has investigated.
All this time goes by, she comes out
again 2026 and says, I'm still calling this
out. No one's ever investigated all that evidence.
All the files they included saying child molestation,
child, you know, whatever, manipulating what was it?
Like, you know,
just basically videos of of manipulating children, of
rape, of torture, all the things they list
off. Those are the words anyway with files
attached, but we don't get to see those
and hopefully we don't nobody should want to.
But nobody's investigated that. And here we are
being told it's all nothing burger. There's nothing
to go on. And she's vouching to this.
I was investigating. Nothing has been done. So
Zora Ranch and Jeffrey Epstein investigation posted by
the New Mexico Department of Justice. The new
mar the New Mexico Department of Justice has
an active criminal investigation into the New Mexico
related matters involving Jeffrey Epstein. As far as
I could tell, this is being no. I
shouldn't even say that since the next point
we're gonna get to. The US government is
trying to stop this, including activities connected to
Zora Ranch. We are seeking credible information from
members of public who may have knowledge. So
here it is. If you have any information
you wanna get to them, reach out to
them.
New Mexico Department of Justice also posted this
on February 19. We are taking a broad
and comprehensive look at Zora Ranch related matters.
And working alongside the truth commission and law
enforcement partners, we will follow the facts and
keep the public informed. I hope that's honest.
Then, of course, we have on March 1,
the US government steps in and says, please
stop that.
Plea please stop investigating the Zora Ranch that
we've never looked into
because, you know, most transparent in in history.
I mean, what are we missing here, guys?
Feds asked New Mexico to halt the Epstein
Pro. It's not secret that they're trying to
drag their feet like everything they've done before,
but realize this is a big story that
no one's really gotten to, that was there,
we can all see it, there's someone in
the government calling it out, and yet still
nothing. I doubt it will happen. Even though
New Mexico is trying to do it and
even though it's in their territory, how much
you wanna bet, my opinion, that somebody in
the administration is gonna do their best to
stop it?
Oh, by the way, on a complete side
note that no one seems to care about,
US house, you know, the control the republican
controlled US house with plenty of Democrats as
well, votes three fifty seven to 65
to block the release of congressional sexual misconduct
reports. What is that? Like, the thirteenth time
they blocked that? I mean, I've seen it
at least once before.
Think about how crazy that is, and I've
seen it before. They literally vote to block
the release of their sexual misconduct reports, probably
because they argue they're all falsely accused. Feels
very reminiscent of the Epstein conversation, doesn't it?
This is the Epstein conversation, ladies and gentlemen.
Three fifty seven to 65.
Republicans and Democrats, guys.
Now this one
is pretty wild. Now each one of these
are sort of independent points, and it's just
not examples of the worst MAGA day yet
in my opinion. Now that doesn't mean, like,
the biggest ones, like Stargate, was insane.
Right? I mean, any number of these things
were huge,
deciding to make glyphosate,
a national imperative.
These are just consecutive major shifts all at
once.
Same day. This is Patriot Takes is the
first one I saw post this. Trump comes
out in support of transitioning children as long
as parents give written approval.
This was real. I'll go through it right
now. I've got the archive. I've even got
the original page still up that hasn't been
changed. What happened was Trump then went and
changed it. Now Now, as far as I
can tell let me know if I'm wrong.
I'm not very active on Truth Social. I
don't think there's an edit button.
That means Trump went into his platform and
then did something that's technically not allowed, which
is alter the post and not and then
leave it there with all the same engagement,
which would make it seem as if we
lied about it. Isn't that interesting?
Now what's crazy about this well, first, to
understand,
this was it says the Save America Act,
which is interesting how this all overlaps with
the Save Act conversation.
All voters must show their ID. All voters
must show proof of citizenship. All vote mail
in ballot. Okay. So far,
nobody should even disagree with all this.
Outside I mean, there's I mean, I shouldn't
say it like that. People have their own
opinions and nuance. If you think there's a
reason, it boxes out certain people, then vote
your opinion. But the reality is from the
legal standpoint,
there's no reason we shouldn't be asking for
people to make, rather make it clear verifying
whether US citizens since that's required to vote.
That seems very basic to me. The point
is that you do not need the Save
Act real ID compliance, which is the whole
point,
to make that happen.
Oh, wait.
Oh, it's waiting on here. I'll get to
it in a while. I have we'll we'll
wanna come back to that in about probably
ten minutes, twenty minutes. But here's the show
about it, and it's literally about the digital
ID part of it. And as we were
telling you back then, the mobile's driver mobile
driver's license part coming to play is what
brings this into fruition. How many times did
I say that? Here we are. March 6.
Here it comes. Relaunching the mobile driver's license.
We'll come back to that. The point
is that the fifth one,
no transgender mutilation surgery for children,
comma,
without the expressed written approval of parents. Woah.
Woah. What?
Okay. Now people may agree with that, and
we all have different opinions out there. But
the point is that the MAGA rather than
the Republican side of the conversation, myself included,
not that I'm Republican is the point, but
I agreed with the stance,
was that this is something that is
parents were a huge part of this.
Basically, and we've saw this where people were
for for what unknown reasons, basically forcing their
children to do it. And that was a
huge issue. That was, like, half the problem.
Other parts of it were sort of like
a contagion issue amongst young kids and then
secretly doing it without their parents' consent. Both
of those I mean, that was, like, fifty
fifty, guys. And one of the major problems
was, like, this political drive from people and,
yeah, very clearly, much more predominant on the
right left side of the conversation,
were basically
just like, you know, like, I guess, coaxing
their children into it.
So the fact that he says without so
that means what he's okay with is the
same horrifying practice with all the same background
and all the same manipulations and all the
same terrible,
long term, almost deadly,
debilitating side effects as long as the parents
are okay with that.
You see my point? That's child abuse. Period.
Because of the whole conversation. If you don't
remember, please go back and look at the
conversation. Feel free to disagree. My point is
not about whether you agree. My point is
about what he said, what his entire
space believes, and for him to say this.
Now the real point for me before I
get into the reality and proving this to
you is that the this is about
saying what you want to hear.
And, apparently, him just either trying to aim
it a little bit down the middle to
kind of appease more people or because he
just forgot what you guys wanted or he's
not paying. I don't know. But realize how
much of this, all that we're seeing, Trump,
all of them, you know, who used to
be a democrat or whatever he said that
day, will say whatever they need to to
get you to support them. That's more obvious
this administration than I've ever seen in my
life. So keeping that in mind.
And here, I'll I'll actually include this real
quick.
The one just one of the many different
shows we did on this. Because this my
opinion is always, guys,
If you're an adult and you wanna do
this to your body, that's completely your choice.
The government should have no say in that.
But when it comes to a child, especially
since these things are done at a point
where your body's still developing, there's just no
way that's acceptable for anybody.
That child goes up, wants to do it
to themselves. That's their choice.
That's just there's no I and I'm I
have I have numerous people in this audience
still to this very day who write me
regularly, who are transgender, who support what I'm
talking about because they understand they made a
choice, and they understand that this can be
manipulated. Whatever it is, parents or anybody else
can be wrong. You know, it is important
to understand that. The weaponization of the transgender
movement and the focus on your kids. There's
plenty more in this conversation, and it's not
conspiratorial.
Literally citing from scientific studies, citing from the
leading group that's discussing doing these, telling you
that they're focusing on children.
There we are. I'll just include the,
tag as well.
So keeping this in mind,
here
is where this went. Oh, well, I think
hold on. Make
sure I didn't miss something.
Oh, okay. No. This this is just me
saying, you know basically, I just I I
saw it and was like, that can't be
real. Like, that's crazy to me. And I
looked and I found it on his true
social, and at the moment, because I saw
it right after it started, sure enough, it
was real. And then I posted the real
link.
But as I said,
oh my gosh. Well, look at that. It's
actually been removed now. See, guys, this is
even more this is even better. You know
why this is better? Because now what happened
is it's been deleted entirely
because
I think this is you know, clearly they're
trying to just cover it up even more.
You change it, that gets caught, it's even
worse, so you delete it entirely. How does
that not show you what we're dealing with
here? I'm gonna prove it to you right
now. This is very real. I'm I'm almost
wondering you know what, actually?
I wonder if that affects the archive because
I did have an issue with this one.
Sorry. I should just get into it since
I'm I'm just I'm fascinated by this. Yeah.
It's still coming up, but it's okay. Going
forward.
Even Massey caught it and says jokingly and
well well well well phrased, he's post transitioned.
So it went from the one that said
with parents' approval to just no transgender mutilation
for children.
Right? So just quickly change to what they
want. Not that I necessarily think that or
care. It's obvious. And so I went and
made sure I included the archive for people
to see. And here's the and this, by
the way, is the
original page. Still up. I just never reloaded
it. It's still
there. Right there. No transgender
mutilation
for children without the express written approval of
the parents. And I'll here. I'll refresh it
right
now. And now it's gone.
Here's the archive. That's why I'm okay to
do that. So you can include this if
you want. Now this is I mean, realistically,
it's a small point, guys. But it is
an important point to understand that these people
are feeding you what you wanna hear, and
that that's a big, big, big deviation.
And on top of that, here's Cassandra McDonald
calling it out. What's important to understand because
what what we're getting well, I know before
I even get into the clip, what we're
hearing from a lot of the people who
are blind followers are just that's fake. It's
not true.
Look. Because it's I looked at the page
and it doesn't say that. Right? So you
got in this argument, and then I posted
I show no. Here's the archive. And they
go, no. That was what somebody manipulated that.
Or, no. That was the second for weirdly
enough, somehow not the the the I don't
even know. The arguments got ridiculous.
But people push back on it, trying to
argue that it just wasn't there. You're lying.
It's not true. Or that that was something
he you know, that that's new or he's
I was a staffer. I got all those
arguments, which is hilarious to me since that
we just got this forceful push about how
it's he pushed everything on true socials directly
from Trump. You can treat it like his
policy. And then, of course, the Obama video
comes out, and Trump's like, oh, it's a
staffer.
Perfect example of what we're talking about. And
then Kelly and Leave it went right back
to it going, oh, Trump is Trump thing.
Okay. So now that people go, it's a
staffer. They're the ones that well know that
they were just telling us that Trump doesn't
do that. It's just hilarious to me. So,
overall,
staffer, new opinion, whatever. It's not. Here's an
old clip of Donald Trump saying this years
ago, and that's really important to understand because
it is always been his opinion, or at
least that's always what he said out loud.
COVID came, and we had a which, you
know, we I because I tell you what,
I did a very good job in COVID.
Nobody knew what the hell it was. I
call it the China virus because I like
being a little more accurate. One of the
main
Yeah. You see, I feel a little more
accurate.
Perfect.
Problems they, put in place is both mandatorily
locking down things,
as well as trying to mandate the health
behavior of people. The FDA just completely was
a shit show, to be frank. This is
a party, the Republican Party of Common Sense.
Forget about conservative, liberal.
We're
let's say conservative, but we're really I just
gotta love this guy. Forget about liberal conservative.
So let's say we're, you know, conservative.
Just do better, man. Do better.
We're
let's say conservative, but we're really a party
of we need borders.
We need fair elections.
Which everybody claims that we need. I mean,
most even Democrats, by the way, despite the
framing. Much of them have different slight opinions
on it, but most everybody in this government
is very adamant of borders.
Ask them. Despite the way they're framed is
the reality. It's usually more of a deeper
secret behind it all, but that's the whole
government, guys. All of them, as you can
see, Trump doing right now. It's about something
beyond the national conversation despite what he's been
telling you. We don't want men playing in
women's sports.
We don't want transgender
operations without parental consent, without parental consent,
without parental consent.
I do think the one area where I
do create a caveat is for surgery. I
think surgery should be left to adults because
it's permanently changing the physical construct of your
body.
Exactly.
How important is that? You know? It's gonna
be brushed off by the ones who don't
want you to look at it, the Nick
Sorters and Hagerty's and Al Jones and Danny
Johnson. All other you trust me.
But what's interesting to me, and which honestly
was is is a small small measure of
respect or maybe just a kinda
deflection because he's been getting a lot of
negative attention for being a hypocrite about around
the Iran war, you even got a post
from Matt.
Matt Walsh. He came out and said, no
trans surgery for children without parental consent is
meaningless.
He says, these kids who are mutilated all
almost always have parental consent. I wouldn't I
mean, I argue more it's somewhere in the
middle, but it's a lot of it. I
mean, honestly, I'd even say he probably knows
more than me on the topic because I
he did a lot of really extensive work
on it, and I I appreciated his work
at the time. And he says the consent
of the parents is not the issue. The
issue is that the procedure is barbaric and
insane. I agree. If no matter if parents
agree to it or not. Now same thing.
If you're an individual, an adult, and you
wanna do it, that's your choice. You may
even feel that it's your best interest. You
think it's something that, you know, is your
true self. God, maybe I'm wrong. That's up
to you to decide. The point, though, in
my opinion, is I do agree with them,
and I think it is dangerous. I think
it is damaging. It is, you know, debilitating.
And we went over this extensively.
The long term the the the makes that
it makes you sterile. That came directly from
the the,
the main group that I discussed at the
time. They had their own little briefing, and
they said, yeah. That's that's likely, but it's
their choice, and that's important for them. That's
not what we were told. Or the major
issues, the back issue, all sorts of things
that it did to them. And not even
get into the most disgusting realities of how
sort of Frankenstein this whole process is. But
Matt called it out.
That's I just think that's important because this
is something that he's been talking about. And
now suddenly, you got people from all sides
of the conversation who are just going, man,
what's going on here? Right?
So continuing.
Mel.
Oh, so just that alone is the point.
Remember, I said they're kinda just a bunch
of scattered points. But just that alone is
insane, and I don't understand why that's not
gotten more attention just because, like I mean,
I do, actually, because the people on the
side that are outraged about that,
many of them are, you know, like I've
said, any partisan side are reluctant to come
out and challenge the team and counter signal
the leader. Right? But a lot of them
see it, and the ones that are get
shouted down by the more team sports screamers.
Now on another point about the Ukraine war,
you know, the one that he apparently ended
or like the rest of whom he claims
he did. The Pentagon are in talks to
buy Ukraine
made interceptors
to fend off attacks by Iranian drones.
And see, Kim says, wait. Wait. Wait a
minute. What? This is just ridiculous for many
reasons because, apparently, this is gonna be ended
on day one. But on top of that,
these are these are
US government sent weapons and and and money
to Ukraine.
And now we're gonna be buying their second
hand she I mean, I mean, who's to
say whether they're better or worse? I'd argue
it's probably worse. But wouldn't that why just
give them to us then if that's the
reality. But realize it also shows you that
they're struggling. They don't have the munitions they
need, and that's been clear even though they
lied about that.
Mel says, why would we have to buy
interceptors from Ukraine when we literally gave them
everything we have? Verne rightly says, vernacular,
says so Trump can fund the Ukraine War
that he isn't technically funding. Well, I actually
disagree with that. I mean, his point is
accurate, but I do believe they funded them.
And I've made points about that many times
mostly through Israel. Right? And it's been I've
proven that. But his point is clear that
you what is that if not funding Ukraine?
You'll probably give them way more than they're
actually worth, and that's effectively giving this is
always how it goes.
And this is just the
if you're unwilling to call out this
hypocrisy, this,
double cross, whatever you think it is, then
you're allowing it to continue.
Here's another one.
Just in, Trump DOJ abandons the investigation into
Biden's auto pen after failing to find an
applicable criminal statute. Gee, I I wish somebody
would've told you that. Oh, that's right. I
did every single time we talked about this.
Every single time. Just like I told you
about Cash's investigations.
Every single time. Not because I'm psychic or
because I've, you know, have some secret school
source because I just looked at the information,
and I reported it accurately.
Crazy how unique that is today.
The reality is you knew this from day
one. You knew that he was lying about
the investigations on the Halloween plot or anything
else we're talking about.
In this case, the reality is clear.
All of them have used auto pens. Well,
it's just a stamp. Right? And the reality
is the Supreme Court has ruled many times
that it is valid
because the point being is that they just
sign a bunch of stuff and so they
can use a stamp where they're using it.
Right? The the issue had become when they
claim, insinuated without evidence, that Biden was letting
somebody else use it. And the argument goes
as follows. Well, he's seen an ounce, so
somebody must have. I don't disagree with that
logic. However, you need to prove it to
make the case. And they never did. And
I said at the time, every time it
comes up, they say these things. They never
give you any evidence.
And my point was then that they that
was by design. I don't think they want
Biden. I don't think any of them wanna
put anybody in jail. They're all on the
same side when it matters. So what it
comes down to is putting forward a case
that lets you think things are happening, but
with a design to make sure it never
goes anywhere. Like James Comey. When was the
last time we heard of that, guys? Didn't
Alex swear they were all gonna go down?
What about Leticia James? No. They dropped all
of those. James Bolton seems to be still
ongoing, but mark my words. That will not
go anywhere. That's my opinion.
So here, they're dropping it. Why? Because there
was never a case there, because they never
had evidence that somebody else did even though
I agree. That's probably the reality.
And Trump says using it is a problem.
Well, he's used it many times on the
record. It's just we're in a ridiculous place.
It's just need to be honest about how
they're lying to you desperately.
Here's the article. DOJ quietly shelves Biden AutoPay
investigation that Trump demanded.
That may have you could read more into
it just for time. There's plenty more to
go on.
And here's five times August. Somebody with integrity
who has decided to a while ago, continue
to call out Trump's administration because they didn't
do what he had hoped. And he was
somewhat supportive. Right? He was he's like a
lot of people were. Let's give them a
chance to show us what they're gonna and
but he has integrity to say, well, they
didn't do it.
So now I'm gonna call it out, like
a lot of them did. Whatever you think
about them, Dave Smith, Tucker Carlson, they're starting
to call them out. He says, Gitmo, we
have everything. All will be revealed. We caught
them.
FAFO, 40 chess, five chess, trust the plan.
He puts the long game, patience.
The point is nothing is happening. They just
they bluster. They bluster. They push. What about
Pelosi? What about Obama? Or Gaetzons. Oh, they're
all coming down. It's all every third Wednesday,
it seems Miller comes out and goes, Obama
or Pelosi's coming down. And then Hagar or
whatever that guy's name is. Eric goes, oh,
holy crap. It's all coming down
over and over and over.
Now this is somebody who just kinda comp
did a little breakdown. Shadowban says they're l's
in the last twenty four hours. Rubio gets
bodied by a reporter.
DOJ drops the auto pen lawsuit. Pentagon asked
Zelensky for help. Kristi Noem gets fired, which
we'll touch on. Trump comes out in favor
of parents approved transgender surgeries.
And then there's a couple more. This one
will probably blow some minds, actually.
Even though if you really were paying attention,
this has been clear the whole time. More
than once, he's come out, like, with the
farmers of certain people. Well, they're okay because
they've been they promised me they're the good
ones. Well, they were here illegally. That was
the point. And now he just says it
exactly.
Illegal aliens are okay if they're doing things
we like.
This is not debatable. This is exactly what
he said. How do you make sense of
this with what we were being told?
Many countries opened up their prisons and dropped
them into The United States. Oh, by the
way, it's also many many of them now,
apparently.
That went from Venezuela did it to many
of them. I'm still not seeing the evidence
that Venezuela did that. Wouldn't surprise
me. Yeah. The the idea that it was
done I mean, the whole point is funny
to me how the he's got his own
mission creep and the way he just lies
about things.
So that people are getting out.
And we have a lot of heart. Now
he said you gotta lighten up on this.
He's talking to you, Macca. That's what he's
saying. You've gotta lighten up on this. Now
here's what he says. We have a lot
of heart for people. They came in illegally,
but they're good people, and they're working now
on farms. They're working in luncheonettes and hotels.
Oh, I get it. Okay. So the ones
the the randomly chosen illegals that work at
the places you like.
But they're illegal, though, Trump. Doesn't that mean
they broke the law? Yes. It does. Didn't
you just tell us that illegal, no matter
what, is the problem? Yes. He did. Well,
funny then. This is some either a body
double, a lie. I don't know. What am
I in a new dimension? I don't understand.
And, we're not
looking we're looking to get the criminals out
right now. Wow. Right. Okay. So then back
to the way it was before, which it
always should have been, which is the people
are criminals, which by the way, that's peep
you're illegal. That's a criminal. Didn't he say
that? You literally just said people who are
here illegally, but they're working at farms. Good
people. We're going after the criminals, though. Well,
that's a criminal based on your assessment, based
on the reality of the law.
Right? Well, I I would also argue it's
much less important than a rapist,
but
it doesn't change the reality of the way
you guys have constructed this. How are there
not more MAGA people marching through the streets
right now? This is and I look. This
is not even to say you know my
opinion, in fact. I've talked about it a
lot. I don't agree with the way they're
doing this. But I agree that the law
is there and the reality of it could
be enforced, but that's not what they're doing.
They're abusing it. They've gone after Americans. They've
gone after innocent people. They've gone after people
going with green cards and visas and peep
people who criticize Israel.
I mean, more clear than anything I've ever
seen this conversation, and people still lie about
it. And here he is going, some of
them are okay.
Criminals.
And I'm not again, be clear. I'm not
even saying that's not illegal aliens in many
cases are people who have come here because
of what our government's doing to their countries.
It's not in in,
you know,
in always the reality that somebody who's illegal
is a criminal. It's just not the case.
In fact, as Melnick always points out, the
lawyer we've caught often reference
from the, immigration counsel
is that the I mean, and you could
look at the stats yourself. I I I
will admit stats can be easily manipulated, especially
from the government. But I've seen it consistently
pointed out over many left and right administrations
that immigrants, by and large,
the the the reality of the stats, commit
far less crimes than average Americans.
Maybe that's because there's less. Maybe it's a
game on numbers. You could decide, but that
is a point. So I just think it's
crazy that what we're talking about is him
just deviating from that entirely.
I mean, somebody right now very needs to
make, and it's probably already out there, a
Trump versus Trump right now with what he's
saying versus what he just said about immigrants,
like, a week ago.
And,
I think it's very important. I mean, I
every once in a while, you see a
story, we take somebody. He should be out
because they came in illegally. So in theory,
they should be, but we're focused on the
murderers.
Okay. Okay. Well, so, yeah, you just said
it should be, but we're gonna ignore that.
We're gonna so the point is, guys, the
lesson of the day is the law is
whatever we want it to be. I'll choose
to selectively enforce it based on how I
feel or what I'm talking to or whether
the illegal aliens happen to be at a
place that I like or somebody who's funding
my campaign.
Right? Doesn't that make sense? Totally normal. In
fact, it really is. We understand our government,
but that's not the point.
The drug dealers,
the mentally insane. We have But even that's
not even the point since they're going after
people who are not any of those things.
A lot of mentally insane killers. I mean,
you can't even talk to them.
Be nice if you could have a little
reason, but you can't even reason. These are
seriously peep ill people. You have
a couple of countries where
they were loaded up. They're meant to You
that he he's gonna ramble. The point, guys,
is obvious. Right?
I mean, how is this something you can
agree with if you were on this the
path of all of these most extremist people
and all I mean, what Miller was saying,
what any of them have been saying?
Well, my opinion, clearly, is that this is
because, as as has been commonly cited, there's
a lot of really high level business interest
that are Republicans who supported him who are
saying you're ruining my business,
whether they utilize illegal aliens or not. The
point is, like, well, it's not about the
crime or the law or the interest of
the people. It's about money. It's about interest.
It's about my supporters, as in money supporters.
And so he chooses to go away from
what he's been saying the entire time. Something
that he used to literally create one of
the most alarming situations I've ever seen in
this country,
Create a situation where he's turned everything on
its head, where he's making deals with despots
and criminals around the world, and then letting
criminals go and sending people to I mean,
think about the whole El Salvador situation. And
this being said,
I I'm I'm not gonna dwell on this
any longer, but it it's worth dwelling on.
Because how does this not wake everybody up
who ever supported him? And, again, it's not
even about whether you agree with him the
stance on either side. It's about saying one
thing and doing another.
And
he just said Trump to the 57%
of Americans because this is one of their
supporters who want illegal immigrants out. Too bad,
they're chief workers.
That's just insane.
Oh, here. Oh, that that's perfect, actually. Look
at what Carly Kalief had posted this on
the fifth.
57% of Americans want all illegal immigrants sent
home. This is just so funny how they
seem to they don't even, like, seem to
talk to each other. Or at the very
least, it's just Trump's reaction, and they're all
up to scramble along with whatever he decided
to think that day.
So here this is the next the same
day even. How embarrassing is that?
Okay.
Added to that, as, Natalie Morris points out,
the Trump administration launches the Patriot Act two
point o. Quote, we will unveil and embarrass
online espionage,
destructive propaganda,
and influence operations, and cultural subversion.
Oh, so a a few different words framed
differently for the same exact thing that's always
been happening from your government. We're gonna decide
what we don't like online, and we're gonna
censor it. We're gonna call it terrorism or
use a different leaning or flavor based on
what the Democrats were saying, but it'll amount
to the same thing. When the government starts
defining threats by propaganda,
influence, and cultural subversion, it's not just targeting
hackers. It's targeting narratives.
President Trump's cyber strategy
for America.
Now, actually, I'm gonna play a clip real
quickly that I'm gonna come back to you
and play in a second because it's relevant
here as well. Here are some Israeli politicians
telling you how this should go.
The next thing
I will do,
we will do,
is to put restriction
on the social media
in a way
that not allow to make brutal propaganda in
the social media.
Because this is a worldwide
problem,
And it should be initiate
by The United States Of America.
Of course. The play Right? Because Israel snaps
its fingers, and is and the US government
does what it what it means. That's pretty
clear right now. It's where all the big
firms
is settled.
Facebook
and
x
and all the rest.
This is a major problem for democracy all
over the globe,
and we need to treat it seriously.
But we can do it. But Democracy. But
remove anything we don't like. You know, this
is all that's the point, guys. It's just
all tokens and buzzwords. They don't care about
any of this stuff. They know what the
what get okay. Think of it like this.
You know, I've talked about how, like, u
USAID oh, I'm gonna put something on the
screen, actually. Hold on.
You like USAID?
And and how the my point was,
USAID, that ultimately were, like, woke for an
out
it it it's it was the government using
whatever it needed to get its foot in
the door. And those were workable points for
the way the world was working at that
moment, the way it was being You know,
and that's largely from the US government, yes,
because it goes It's a teeter totter game
left and right. It's the same thing. And
so in this case, you could argue
Where was I? Hold on. I'm just losing
my point there.
I just lost it. Shoot.
Well, the point was about, you know, basically,
USAID.
Basically, it was it was just using those
terms to get to to
accomplish the point. Oh, that's what it is.
So, basically, that you have Israeli politicians or
US government going, you know, democracy and freedom
or whatever. That's because they just know that's
what's gonna get momentum or at least it
was. And that those evolve just like Trump
and the immigrants or whatever else. They're just
feeding you what needs to be done or,
you know, feeding you what needs to be
fed in order to get you in a
certain place.
I mean, that's guys, how can we even
deny that right now? It's over and over
and over. Right? So here's the US government
creating the same, you know, just
an
extension of what it's always been doing, and
it's aimed at the same stuff. I mean,
how do we gonna how do we not
know what that means already with what they've
already been doing? Ozturk and Khalil and everything
else,
all of which have blown up in their
face, by the way. Doesn't matter.
Now a couple of the points that for
Iran that we'll come back to when we
get to that section, but I wanted to
make sure you saw in the beginning here
or somewhat in the beginning. As Mel writes,
the Pentagon, which already has a $1,000,000,000,000
yearly budget, thanks to Donald Trump's administration,
needs another a $184,000,000,000
to do a special military operation against a
country with a yearly defense budget of about
9,000,000,000.
For reference, expenditures for the first year of
the Iraq war
were including an invasion were $54,400,000,000.
Adjusted for inflation would be around 72,000,000,000.
He's asking for a $184,000,000,000
to go to war with Iran. But don't
worry. It'll be over in a couple weeks,
we're told.
As Israel continues to tell you, this is
not going away.
I mean, how how long until we realize
what they say is what ultimately happens to
the US government?
On top of that, Lockheed Martin points out,
we have agreed to quadruple
critical munition production
as they just had a meeting about these
manufacturing company the the merchants of death And,
basically, as was being discussed about whether they
were gonna chop some off or, you know,
basically work with the people that would do
what they needed or, you
know, continue
the war footing for this country. And, also,
the kind of weird woke overlap. Like, we'll
get to the AI point briefly. But it
says, as a result of president Donald Trump's
leadership, we began this work months ago with
secretary Hetacek. Oh oh, months ago.
Oh, weird how so you mean you ramped
up your production of of munitions
aggressively
a month ago before the war started, before
you'd even announced that back when Trump was
telling you peace was gonna happen? Funny how
that works out. These people are stupid. And
I mean the administration that allows this to
happen, how dumb and obvious that is. Or
maybe they just actually know that it's not
gonna make any difference. I hope the second
one's not the reality.
The truth is that you can prove that.
You can prove that the Israeli government said
we planned this a week ago when that
happened. You can prove that they were already
arming the Kurds months ago before we got
here. And that's not even unique in the
larger conversation, but for the purpose of Iran.
It's always been there. Now, the point on
top of all that, what do you think
this means? More money.
Quadruple
the munitions needed? Good god. You know how
much these things cost? Welcome to more taxes,
guys. And guess where that's gonna come from?
You.
That's the reality, guys. And they're just and
what happened to lower,
less government, less spending? Oh, I guess that
got thrown out the window when Israel wanted
to invade Iran,
or from day one when you really look
at it. Now Trump tells CNN he's not
worried about whether Iran becomes a democratic state.
Man, it's funny how these narratives shift. It
used to take weeks, months. Now it's thirty
seconds later. What do you mean democracy?
That doesn't matter. I just wanna control the
country. Isn't that what we always do? Oops.
I'm not supposed to say that out loud.
I'm just is this incompetence?
Is it is it that we they want
us to see it? You can decide.
But how do you start this by telling
us you're going to save them from the
the authoritarian,
you know, what whatever they're calling it, and
say, we're gonna want democracy, then here's the
crown prince.
And by the way, there's a lot going
around right now about how somehow the crown
prince has
accepted the role. And as far as I
could tell when I checked, that wasn't accurate.
Now maybe it is, and it hasn't been
announced yet, and that's somehow coming out. The
reality, though, as far as I could tell,
that that wasn't actually verifiable when I started
the show, but maybe it is. It wouldn't
surprise me.
I don't I think Rajavi or the Shah
are one of the two groupings they're gonna
try to put in power, but there's a
lot of media out there trying to always
lie and maybe drive that into reality.
And this is just hilarious to me. Right?
So what's the point of what you're doing?
Oh, because evil bad guys, and they're gonna
do, well, I've never seen anything. What what's
the example? We're just supposed to believe you
that they were about to do something? You
group, the Israel US government that have lied
to us about everything,
everything,
every day, nonstop, left or right, but we're
gonna trust you this time? Even Charlie Kirk
told us not to trust you guys this
time before he died.
Was killed.
On top of that, this is an interesting
quick overlap to the the
BS that comes out of this administration. He's
trying to feed you whatever he needs to
to keep you calm.
Cutter comes out and says Iran war, which
everyone knows this is the reality because this
is where it's going,
could bring down the world economies of the
world, and Warren's oil prices may see a
$150
within, you know, a barrel within days. I've
heard a while I'm sure this has changed
since then, but a while ago, the argument
was if it goes over a 100, that
could spin things out, you know, blah blah
blah. Which that it's actually there's valid arguments
to be made.
Point though,
everyone can see where this is going. Every
mission fired, every potential oil placed bomb. I
mean, this and just the actions and the
straight up removes, this is increasing rather, causing
this kind of problem to rise.
But, simultaneously,
here's what Trump says to Americans.
Don't worry. I see gas prices going down
very quickly.
Sure. Maybe. Maybe. And what the MAGA team
does is, oh, secret. What he's wink wink
telling us is he's got a plan to
steal this or take that or bomb this.
It'll make we'll get all this oil. Maybe.
Or maybe you just assume whatever you want
to to believe he's doing the right thing
or, I guess, whatever you can cheer for.
At the end of the day, that's not
likely with where we are.
But maybe. And maybe that does try to
be the case, but assumption is what partisans
do. Also, I wanted to point this out.
I thought this was hilarious.
Just on the point of of partisanship,
where where I live, there there's a, or
I guess, sort of in general relation to
where I live, there's there was a place,
a a house that was on this corner
location. Very, very lots of traffic,
and it had this big part right in
the street. And this person for, 2020 forward,
there was just Trump regalia.
Huge Trump flag, all this stuff. It was
there for I mean, up until very recently.
There forever. Even even during the time he
wasn't president, they kept it up saying you
know, like, basically saying he was actually the
president. Right?
Up until recently.
And I've seen this never stopping, always there,
new signs, stuff every day. And then all
of a sudden, we drive by yesterday, everything's
gone, and he's got local politics in his
straight in his in his grass
for Tennessee.
Now maybe that maybe that just means nothing.
Maybe he's just you know, even though I've
been here the entire time for all this
time and I've never seen a change, maybe
it just maybe they decided to focus on
local. What I think it means is exactly
what you probably already think, that I'm watching
people everywhere start to recognize what's happening and
even more so take the advice that we're
giving. Focus on local politics if you believe
you can make if you wanna make a
difference.
I think that's really important to think about.
And, guys, it is everywhere.
And they're scrambling. That's why you get these
jackals out there going, look, I think every
98%
says they support everything Trump is doing. How
can anybody believe that with even a glimpse
at what's happening right now?
So back to the point of, I guess
this is an extension sort of of the
bad day, but it goes into a new
topic. And this is about technocracy, and we'll
get into the greater North American conversation. This
I just thought was really interesting and alarming
and exactly what we've always been telling you.
Jeffrey Hall points out the Japanese prime minister
met with Palantir president, of course, because they're
just
totally a small little democrat company if you
look at Alex Jones. This TV news report
states that he is called America's shadow president.
Details of their meeting were not released to
the public.
So you have you have a Japanese report
about Palantir, Peter Thiel,
calling him America's shadow president.
Do you realize how blind we have to
be to not recognize what's going on when
everyone else in the world is pretty aware
of what's happening. Laura Myers says, you you,
oh, actually, I forgot about this. I didn't
include this. You've seen this clip. Just worth
hearing this again with where the world is
going when this guy is being called our
shadow president.
Maybe we should remember what he said about
whether humans should exist.
Prefer the human race to endure. Right?
You're hesitant. Well, I yes? I don't know.
I I would
I would,
this is a long hesitation. It's so long
hesitation. There's so many questions in question.
Now, I actually believe that that was almost
felt faster. But either way, it's the same
point. It goes on longer than that. I
mean, it's like, you're I
don't know. It's like, how can you possibly
deliver? I don't think you can even pretend
that means anything other than what it obviously
does.
And that's think about that, the influence and
what they're doing. Yeah. This is technocracy, guys.
This is transhumanism. This is that's what it's
not even a secret. They're very adamant about
it. They believe in the
what's it called? The
oh, it's not regenerative. What is the
damn. Forget the term. I'm freaking a lot
of it today. The the the they can't
really bring this up, in fact, in case
I can
oh, see. I can't remember the word. There
there we did the show on the, oh,
I remember to get it. Hold on.
Here we go. Longevity. That's what it is.
Meet Jim O'Neil, the longevity
enthusiast who is now RK Junior's right hand
man. Now longevity is sort of a
kind word for what we're talking about. Technocracy,
transhumanism, they're they're trying to extend life using
technology, and that that makes it even sound
very benign when you read exactly what they're
talking about. And Peter Thiel and the rest
were were ecstatic when this happened.
They're telling us, it's not a secret. What
this is, where they they're trying to drive
the world in that direction.
Then you may not even think that's bad.
That's up to you to decide. But I
think it's important to see where
the rest of the world can see.
Now Ricardo points something out about that extent
the the,
technocracy sort of, I guess, more so Silicon
Valley AI part of the conversation.
And I do agree with this, and I
think I want to talk about this more
as it goes forward.
He says the biggest power grab since Standard
Oil is happening today, and almost nobody is
paying attention.
Tech companies
are apparently building their own power grid,
according to Donald Trump.
And to me, I think this is exactly
what we've been talking about. Right? I mean,
you could argue I mean, honestly, I agree.
Even in its own right, there's logic to
it. Right? It kinda makes sense because, yeah,
they are using tons of of energy, and
that seems like a problem reaction solution. Oh
my god. How are we ever gonna do
this? They're sucking up all the water. Oh,
well, and water, by the way, is not
the same conversation. But, you know, energy and
all these people are having problems. Well, don't
worry. We'll just let them build their own
power. Now that may make sense. You may
not even think that's a problem. But I
think when you think about the bigger picture
of where this goes,
you're creating a new new infrastructure.
At the same time, while they're creating a
new global structure, new
large you you know, new WHO proposals, new
I mean, everything.
I just find it to be a little
bit disconcerting. Maybe you disagree. Here's what Trump
was actually saying about it, and I'll read
the rest of it.
Announced on Tuesday under our new
rate payer protection pledge, we're also telling the
big tech companies
that energy usage
AI data centers cannot drive up price in
community
electric prices in communities.
They have an obligation to pay that.
We have told them,
you gotta build your own power plant. You
can't take it. You gotta build it. And,
actually, we're doing them a favor because they
never thought they'd have it so good. Because
our grid, which is very old and broken,
tired I have it so good. It doesn't
have great capacity. Cannot sustain the kind of
numbers that you're Oh, right. Right. So what
you're telling us your stuff sucks, so we're
gonna build our own. But you guys can
keep using the one that doesn't work very
well.
Why wouldn't you then invest that money and
everything else you're doing into helping us, Trump?
Isn't that what you promised?
No. We're gonna make sure they get what
they want.
Draining out of it. So I gave them
the right, and now it's mandatory. I made
it mandatory Wow. Where they have to build
their own electric power plant so that See,
what you're getting is these MAGA people going,
yeah. Tell them what to do, Trump. You're
winning.
It's so easy to play these people that
will fall into that
by making it seem like somehow it's, here's
what we didn't want, then I made them
do the thing. Then you take a step
back and you realize the thing was what
they've always wanted to do. It's basic. It's
always how this works. And the reality is,
guys, this is building out their you're creating
essentially new states, new, like, little entities of
their own. That is the network state conversation.
Like, think about what we're talking about. You're
building out this entirely new like, think about
how you have these AI data centers basically
taking over little cities. Beep like like, small
towns where people are leaving because everything's being
used. I've talked about,
I'm forgetting the name. God. I'm forgetting everything
today. The
the the quartz crystal location. Spruce Spruce Pines.
And and you listen to the people. That's
not every single group, but there's a lot
of people complaining, saying that their stores are
closing. Nothing's happening. They're just absorbing everything. And
so now you're gonna build their own energy.
How does that not then become, like, the
precursor to the network state conversation?
Here, before I read that,
include that for you in case you don't
know the conversation.
And I will actually touch on this again.
Oh, you know what? I think I have
most of some of them right here.
But
ultimately amounts to this.
Fake globalist resistance ushering in the globalist plan.
That's how I see this playing out. And
so right now, that's the beginning of this,
which is essentially the CEO run nation. And
remember the free Freedom City push? That was
the same thing. Same funding, same people, same
conversation. That's Prospera, that's Bouquet Land. It's it's
the same kind of multiple things. Seasteading, it
is the same direction.
The network state coup and the engineered transition
to tech Zionism. Oh, oh, don't forget. That's
what they call it, tech Zionism, because that's
not alarming as hell with what's going on
in the world. So he says tech companies
are building their own power grid. They're about
to produce more electricity than their entire countries.
Right now at the White I mean, watch
how quickly you can see this turning into,
oh, well, now we have to go to
those companies for our power.
Put them in a place of control, doesn't
it?
And it says, right now at the White
House, CEOs from Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI,
Oracle, and xAI,
of course, are signing a pledge that most
people will scroll past. And we're gonna get
to XAI and Authentix and how that is
playing a factor right now.
Their own power plants, their own transition lines,
their own energy infrastructure, these are these are
software companies agreeing to become power utilities.
Amazon is buying nuclear reactors.
Microsoft restarted 3 Mile Island.
Meta signed twenty year nuclear deals. Chevron is
building 2.5 gigawatt natural gas plants in West
Texas specifically to power data centers. These companies
aren't supplementing the grid. They're replacing it for
themselves. Now from a simple point of power,
you know, from, functionality, you could argue, well,
good. It's good in the immediate sense of
them not taking the power or the energy
you know, the resources that we might need.
But But doesn't that feel like an obvious
setup? Because when you look at the numbers,
the moment it started, it was objectively clear.
There's a choke point. This is obviously going
to be a problem. They knew that. And
you could argue they just didn't care. I
would agree. But it might have just been
simply creating the the issue that we then
cry about so they can go, well, well,
here you go. We'll give them something that
if they started with, we'd have been like,
what? That's crazy. But now we're going, oh,
good. And that's how that works. Seven companies
now control more computing power than most governments.
And today, they're signing paperwork to control their
own energy supplies too. Computing, data, energy, infrastructure.
That's not a tech company anymore. See what
see what he's saying? It's a very good
point. That's I you it's a country. It's
a it's whatever you wanna call it. The
the pledge has zero legal teeth. It says
the Harvard Energy Law professor already started a
pledge,
meaningless because utilities in in this conversation are
spending tens of billions on power projects for
data centers, and those costs still being spread
across the rate payers anyway. So the pledge
has zero teeth, legal teeth, no enforcement mechanism,
no compliance monitoring, no penalty for breaking it.
It's a political move designed to get tech
companies through the midterms
without becoming the villain of every campaign ad
and about electricity bills.
But the underlying shift is is real and
irreversible. Tech companies are becoming energy companies. Energy
companies are becoming AI infrastructure.
And then, I mean, think about that. Then
that's that's what is that? That's like the
technic like, the way that AI is being
set up, as we can all see, through
surveillance, through every part of what we're already
living through, then you have them at this
power hub behind it. I mean, that is
a control center, guys.
That is the control grid control center.
With seven companies control when seven countries control
both the world's intelligence, which is what's going
on, and the power that runs it,
who is governing who?
Whom? The point here, guys, clearly, is that
the intelligence side of this is part you
know, what we I it's Palantir is is
an intelligence entity, clearly, at least in part.
And you give them all of that information,
which is basically everything we have in this
country, and then you give them the power,
the energy, the control over it. I mean,
that's more power. I mean, you know, it's
it's all very clear. That's control that is
alarming, especially with the group that's involved with
a genocide. That's Palantir, Lavender, Absorra. They're literally
using their AI to murder people. Alice Karp
was proud about that.
So here
wait.
How do I end up with this over
here?
Hold on. Let me keep this over here
just in case I need that for something.
It's an article. I forget if what I
ended up using or not. Anyway, I come
back to it. So, the point
to continue on this direction is through Twitter,
which we talked about a lot.
Authentics
is an Israeli intelligence connected entity that is
clearly a problem.
That's been called out a lot. I've called
out a lot. This is the first discussion.
Israeli unit eighty two hundred type company. The
founder is is former unit eighty two hundred.
And we've gone over this a thousand times
about how clearly even the government will state
that we literally create these companies for this
purpose. And I'll I'll play that clip again
in a second.
Runs Twitter verification.
And it was right on there which said
that we'll hold your biometric data.
I followed up with this one because Elon
Musk promised to stop using it and then
didn't.
See, every every one of these individual points
should be enough to make people wake up
to them, but they don't. Twitter's still using
Authentix.
And, of course, at the same time, Israeli
soldiers arrested for gang rape protected by leadership.
Remember that story?
Funny how it drifts in the background.
So still using it.
MintPress news, Alan McLeod. I actually reached out
to him to try to get him on
for interview. So let me know if you
wanna see that because I think it would
be a good discussion.
Ex users
on Twitter find their real names
are being Googled in Israel
after using Twitter verification software, Authentix.
Think about that.
And what we're we're being told this is
not some, Israel there's work being told this
is, you know, an entity here, as always.
Run by Israeli entities, but here. So clearly,
what what you're seeing, and I agree with
this. If you wanna get into this in-depth,
it's quite obvious that a couple points are
highlighted that this is an Israeli intelligence connected
thing. This has been clearly identified.
That's why he put Elon said I'll get
rid of it. Didn't.
I even know somebody personal to me that
was upset about this.
A significant number of Authentic's employees are also
ex Israeli spooks. Until 2016,
Elrond Levy was a unit eighty two hundred
agent.
The 2022 in 2022, the company hired him
as a developer. Others, however, go straight from
the intelligence services right into Authentix.
Lior Immune Emuna, for instance, left her job
at an intelligence analyst at unit eighty two
hundred to join Authentix.
She's now an
analytics manager. And in 2019,
Sarah Benita left her position as a mobile
communication system operator at unit eighty two hundred
to become an engineer for the company. Director
of product manager of management, Shay Retcher, meanwhile,
was a senior Israeli Defense Forces IDF commander
before joining the organization. That's aside from the
creator who was also unit a two hundred.
There's one other point. Maybe not. No. Okay.
Oh, yeah.
I was right. Thought I had one more
thing on there. But, you know, I Alan
does great work. Check this out. And I
think this is just an example of how
you're being sold out, guys, by the very
people acting like they're on your side. This
has been there from day one. And now
you have it you it Israeli intelligence essentially
surveilling you through this platform.
Here's an article, Naked Capitalism. Ex premium users
face stark choice. This is back in 2024.
Hand over biometric identifiers to spooky Israeli firm
or get demonetized.
Right? It didn't seem as as important much
then. Right? But what was happening? He was
literally holding your in your revenue in this
platform
over your head to force you to give
up your biometrics to this Israeli company.
Oh, here. Let me play this real quick
since I do always think this is relevant.
I always forget what the term was on
there. It was,
pager, I think. Yeah. There it is.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they did For those who don't
remember, we're talking about the pagers that Israel
the pager that everyone claimed was a great
it was it was a terrorist attack. They
they made pagers into bombs or however they
functionally did it, and they put it in
Lebanon and let it circulate for years.
By their admission by their claim, ten years.
And acting like we don't obviously know that
means it could end up in the hands
of anybody anywhere. Literally, that means it could
be everywhere in the world and probably was.
I bet you have a pager somewhere else
that happened to blow up that nobody even
connected with it or something happened. I mean,
just think about how crazy that is. Ten
years.
That could have been anywhere.
And they admit that they did this and
they planned it, and the point was it
it mutilated and killed mostly women and children.
So the conversation about how how would you
make that happen? And he goes on to
make it very clear, an interview that was
set up by the Israeli government, that was
promoted by the Israeli government where they state
very clearly that we make fake companies and
we'll use it to supply the the to
manipulate the supply chain. So here we are
talking about this while we're pointing to a
company they claim is totally not intelligence, but
this is what they're talking about. We make
companies that are intelligence that are fake companies.
Not that they don't offer products. They function
like a real company, but they're technically intelligence.
It's all over the conversation. Whitney's written about
it for TLAB. It's everywhere.
And know that they were buying it from
Israel? Who did they buy it from? Or
I think they were buying it from. We
have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
shell companies over shell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
This is Mossad's old office.
Its motto from Proverbs twenty four six says
in so many words,
wage war through deception and trickery.
Yeah. That's not obvious, is it? So point
is for they literally Neil Elon Musk coerced
you through money to force you to give
it up to those kind of companies.
Here's AF Post. In order to be monetized
2024,
Twitter began July 1. Users had to give
their is give Israeli intelligence company, Authentix, access
to their government issued DID and biometric data.
And you you saw it at the time.
I documented this very clearly. It was it
was very clearly Authentix. This is probably even
my image I put out there. I'm I
I was
screaming about this.
The founder of Authentix, Ron, Oz Osman,
is a,
Azam. How do you say that? Osman. Is
a retired member of the IDF's clandestine unit
eighty two hundred, which provides Israel with 90%
of its intelligence material.
Now Authentic's 03/06/2026
is growing
with other companies doing the same thing, but
the whole point is about this direction, multiple
companies, the digital identity sector. The digital identity
sector
is undergoing notable leadership reshuffles
with several major players appointing new executives as
history braces for tighter regulation,
raising fraud threats and accelerating enterprise demand.
TENTIX and everyone else here have each strengthened
their senior ranks to scale operations.
Oh, yes. In case you missed the point,
Authentix is digital ID, which is exactly what
we're talking about, but let's just keep ignoring
how clear everything is and how it all
interconnects, and Israel being a major part of
that. So all of them are discussing this,
Authentic's identity verification and fraud prevention company, Authentic,
has announced a series of milestones as enters
what it describes as its next phase of
global growth.
This includes a new board appointments, extended leadership
teams, and increased adoption by major enterprises. The
company said the integration
contributed to a 90% reduction of in fake
account openings,
or otherwise known as censoring people they don't
agree with,
demonstrating the impact of reusable verification credentials combined
with automated fraud detection.
The company has also expanded its fraud intelligence
hub, which uses dedication
dedicated red and blue teams to simulate real
world attacks and strengthen defenses as fraud, tactics
evolve. So Israel is deciding who gets censored
and who you are in the world in
this dynamic along with other companies.
But realize where this goes with Twitter, guys,
and what we're talking about. So here's this
clip again.
Here is what Israel is telling you about
what needs to happen through things like autentics.
That was right. I pulled it down.
The next
thing I will do,
we will do,
is to put restriction
on the social media
in a way
that not allowed to make brutal propaganda
in the social media.
Because this is a worldwide
problem,
and it should be initiate
by
The United States Of America,
the place where all the big
firms
is settled.
Facebook
and x
and all the rest.
This is a major problem for democracy
all over the globe,
and we need to treat it seriously.
They're all about censoring your opinions while screaming
free speech. It's just how this works, guys.
So this person, will just points out the
Israelis'
politicians names, Yari Golan and,
oh, if they didn't like, the other game
name I don't have. The point is that
they're discussing
censorship.
And, like, this is just a point to
remember. You know? Are we pretending that there's
not an endless procession of US and Israeli
entities left or right telling you why they
have to control your speech, but yelling free
speech?
It's pathetic.
Now the Sabacc point, going back to Trump's
original discussion about it, is all part of
this, guys. And what do you think is
involved with the real ID compliant identification?
Groups like Authentic. It's the same point. It
is obvious.
I made this point a thousand times, and
they're right back to pushing it again. They
tried to use the moment the election time
frame to coerce you into thinking it was
needed for the election, and Massey came out
and said it wouldn't be done by the
time this happened. They're lying to you. And
they're try they're building the push again for
for midterms.
It's just it's one lie after another from
all of them, guys. And the reality here
is that this doesn't need to include
I digital ID. It just doesn't. It doesn't
need to include real ID compliance. I mean,
you could literally pass the bill without any
of that, and that would it would imply
every other piece you could use using whatever
ID, digital ID, whatever.
The point is verifying who you are, and
you don't need that point of it. You
don't need the real ID part. You don't
need the ID twenty twenty part, which are
the same conversation, which are explicitly
about digital ID.
So my point I've been making about this
since this came out was this is a
double
most US government manipulations with the false two
party paradigm is using both sides to, you
know, waddle it in. So you got them
coming out with the the Save Act. Right?
And that is requiring
Real ID compliance as one of the options.
But, of course, it includes birth certificate. It
includes the other which are rapidly diminishing in
the world because of where it's going. And
they know that. Right? And so the point
was there. You got all those. Right? It's
not just digital. Okay. Fair enough. My point
my point at the time was, well, why
do you even need it in there? You
don't. It's not necessary. In fact, it actually
complicates the bill, but that's the point. So
then you got things from the Biden administration.
2024.
White House poised to throw federal support behind
mobile driver's licenses. And you know why this
is important? Because when you get into it
and really cut to the chase to all
of them, it's explicit in their direction where
they say that these things will be phased
out. It's right in the documentation.
So they will phase out the physical versions.
So once they get a mobile driver's license,
well, now it's not, you know, it's not
the driver's license, the birth certificate. It's the
digital version of it. And then real ID
compliance, which ultimately folds all in together. It's
not a secret. And my point was, watch
as this comes out from the left, brings
out the mobile driver's license, and the right
brings Well, now it's just kinda blending together,
it seems, as we're now seeing Florida come
out, and we're relaunching the mobile driver's license
program.
It's you it's not a secret. You don't
even need Florida saying this to know it's
already happening because it's in there. These things
will phase out. That's part of it. Now
Now even in the mobile driver's license, it
says that you can use both, but, eventually,
it will only be the digital version.
It's no secret.
Don't demand that. Demand they take that part
out, and I'd support it.
And here's a clip from Tim Hinkliffe
from, the Euro Parliament. But this is the,
I forget her name, but the grouping of
people that were really adamantly speaking out about
COVID nineteen. So this is them being critical
of this direction. But it is clear
Digital ID is coming. They're all pushing it,
and I what they said here is even
more alarming. Digital ID will become
a digital twin of you.
God. It's frustrating being right about these things.
Presentation on the legal aspects. I will give
three tips. The first one is the digital
ID and its create our system.
So,
the digital ID will become a digital
twin of you.
The European Union does not have the legal
power
to impose this ID system Yes, it is.
Because
the EU is not a state
or a country.
The EU can't sit on the chair of
the member states.
Therefore,
member states can refuse to implement the digital
ID.
And I hope really that this happens.
And for EU citizens,
my advice
is to
not keep a digital ID if you have
one, just dump it.
The second point, the digital ID is not
issued by the EU or your governments,
but by a cartel of banks and big
tech companies.
This means that when you download your digital
ID, you do this at your own risk.
The digital ID
exceeds skulls above
the legal system and the political system.
Each
MEP and church
Right. Think authentic.
And it's not just that. Right? It's not
even just Israel, but think that in that
conversation. That's what she's talking about. Their your
governments are selling you out to the highest
bidder, to whatever company is gonna be doing
this. And they've they've already made statements that
it's, like, not their responsibility. Of course, it
is because you're forcing us into this.
It's also subject
to the ID.
So Maike, do you have the clicker for
your presentation? Wonderful. Yep. Yep.
So and the third one is the digital
ID is implemented
using censorship and propaganda using the corporate media.
We should never accept the censorship and also
not the one-sided propaganda.
We if we can stop the censorship and
propaganda machine, it will be very hard for
the cartel to implement the digital ID.
Yep. Exactly.
And that that's that's kind of the point
for all this stuff. Right? If we can
effectively
expose the propaganda,
it'll be much more difficult. I'll include this
too. It's just it's one example, but it's
one of the very large ones in the
real sense of the the two digital twin
conversation. Now, really, just to be clear, what
she's talking about is a is a broad
sense of that point, that it effectively is
a digital twin of you online.
But my point is that it goes well
beyond just the representation of your information, and
you guys know this. And this is where
it goes. And this is not even where
it goes. This is where it is in
a lot of ways. But I believe this
is where this becomes
a universal reality for how this world operates
if we don't stop it. And this
is a pro a project called or rather
just the the,
it's the Weizmann Institute of Science. Meet your
digital twin.
The this AI model can predict your future
health
and help you change it. Now, not health,
but the the the logic point is because
they're focused on health. Right? Well, digital twins,
it's predictive models. They can use these things
to predict what you'll do later, what'll happen
in your health, what you'll be doing. You
know, this I've said this so many times.
It's like think like a SimCity scenario.
Like a mat like, it's a like a
program. This is very real for those that
wanna dismiss this. It's easily look. You can
look this stuff up. And it's just logical.
You can understand how your data's being used.
It's that you have people out there, governments,
intelligence, who are taking every data point that's
come like a Palantir, by the way, that's
coming through what you're doing. What I'm literally
saying as I'm doing this show, what you
posted twenty seconds ago, it's being absorbed in
this algorithm, you know, the AI machine that
is then adding it to a database of
what you are. And let's just make it
simple. It's a database of your little town.
Right? And everybody in the town is represented.
And it's like a SimCity. They're moving around.
They're going through the day, but like as
a as like a digital program.
And what you're adding to the information then
affects what that program acts out as you
in that system.
And the point is
that doing that enough with how much data
we put into this, they could they're arguing
from the stuff I've read that you can
get, like, an in the ninetieth percentile, like,
exit of, like, guess or
estimating
where you'll you know, what you'll do Tuesday
next month at two 2PM,
and and and be very accurate about it.
Now people who are more
routine based, that's pretty obvious. But think about
how AlarmNet is for where this goes with
what they're already doing to us. I think
this has to be discussed more because it
is already happening, and I think we're talking
about like, think about things like,
things like dystopian movies like Eagle Eye or
one of these movies. They're talking about how
that's,
you know,
projected, where the AI essentially can map out
everything to an agree to where it can
predict
almost anything.
It's not a secret. It's been talked about
forever, and this is already happening. Now on
top of the fact that it also happens
to be in Israel. Now that could be
nothing. I just think it's important this I
didn't when I first looked up to this
this project, I didn't even know it was
in Israel. And it's just a it's just
a big project, the human phenotype project. But
recognize where it's going. And the groups involved
with this, the ones like the central elements
are do committed genocide are are telling you
that they're okay with the terrible things we're
talking about in the world. That has to
matter. It has to matter.
Now, quick deviation because I think this is
really important. I may end up cutting it
short for time, but we're not going that
long actually so far. I wanna talk about
Kristi Noem. Now I might go through this
in-depth
in another show when the next one is,
probably tomorrow.
Or, technically, yeah, definitely tomorrow. The point though
is I I always wanted to start with
this, but I just wanted to get that
stuff in in people's minds.
This is super important before we get in
I'm really for everything, but get into the
larger conversation of Iran.
Because of
the way that this Republican senator breaks down
about Noam, what I've always been saying and
what anybody could see if they were just
being honest with themselves,
that she's incompetent.
And by the way, remember, if you haven't
caught on if you haven't seen the report,
she's been fired already. Or technically, she's been
she's been what did they what did the
guy jokingly call it?
Promoted or demoted up or whatever they called
it. Like, you know, she basically is wildly
incompetent, and finally, everyone's calling it out. And
then she gets, like, what appear what they
make look like a promotion. It's not, though.
They're trying to frame it that way. Like,
we need you over here. I knew that's
how it would go.
So she didn't even get fired, understand. She
just got moved.
This is how disgusting this is. Even though
the reality is he was so embarrassed that
everyone called her out that, like, the the
reality of the evidence is damning, and instead
of getting rid of her, you move her?
There's just there's no and the whole point
of why they're criticizing her in this is
that they aren't holding their own people accountable,
but are holding ICE accountable. And this is
a Republican saying this.
And so I want you to hear that
on top of the fact that he says
that Stephen Miller seems to be running these
things, that Stephen Miller seems to be dictating
these things. This is really important. This is
coming from the government,
or rather just the Republican side of the
government and people who are in this, who
I argue are making this case because
the momentum was leading Noam away. And so
they wanna be seen for sort of like
the side calling it out. I I I
question all of this, the theater of it
all, but it is still important, I think,
because it is a moment where Republicans who
might be trusting these people need to recognize
that the the one they told you was
the best person ever. She's so smart, and
they always know. Now they're not. And they
never were, but they'll lie to you about
whatever they need to lie to you about
to get you where they need you to
be. This is crazy to watch. There's another
one, by the way, about
a, the contract she gave that company. I
mean, my opinion about more than just her
and more than just this one contract, this
is profiteering, guys.
They're using you, and they're just having a
heyday.
Selling things to whoever Trump's selling watches and
crypto is insane.
Never it's been like this before.
And I think this is an insight into
one example, and she was too clumsy about
it, so they moved her away. The rest
of her are doing the same thing.
So are Democrats, by the way. Let's not
be able to be clear about that. But
this is just bad. They're that's what I've
said from day one. These people are bad.
They're not they're dishonest. Sure.
But they're out of their depth in this
position. That's, in a way, almost a well,
I shouldn't call it a compliment, but some
of these more devious people are better at
lying about it. You know? But watch this
clip, and I think it speaks for itself.
Thank you, mister chairman. Secretary Noem, thank you
for Now I'll play just a quick part
of the opening, and then I'm gonna jump
to about five minutes. But, you know, he
basically starts with this back and forth. Thanks
for being here.
I'm really glad that a lot of my
Republican colleagues talked about the disaster that Biden
and Mayorkas, your predecessor,
created.
It was absurd. You heard the things from
senator Brett, people that came over here who
themselves were traumatized by the very people who
then come to this country and traumatize American
citizens.
You heard senator Oh, and one thing to
point out, which will be clear when you
watch this, he's very adamant about the immigration
direction, right, about you know, which which in
a way, I'll I'll point it out then.
He's simply just saying that we have to
get rid of illegal aliens, which, again, that's
the law. So there's it's it's it's not
as if he's well, I'll let it speak
for itself. It seems as if he's supportive
of the more aggressive direction. But even though
that's the case, he's screaming, like, in a
sense of, you know, calling her out. Like,
just just
nail her to the wall.
Schmidt,
saying the same thing. A lot of us
are very frustrated with the disaster
that that, president Biden left behind and a
failed DHS.
It's why I'm angry and it's why I've
been critical of you, secretary Noem, because we're
missing an opportunity. Ladies and gentlemen, one of
the reasons president Trump
won,
a year and a half ago
is because people were sick and tired of
a Democratic administration's
open border policy and allowing millions of people
to come to this country. 1,700,000
called gotaways. We don't even know where they
are, but we know when you pay a
premium to a cartel
to get them into this country, they're bad
people.
Yeah. They're probably at Mar A Lago. They're
probably at Trump's friends' farms or whatever we're
talking about or Democrats too, but realize that's
what he's screaming about because Trump agree. Trump
just got up and said, no. No. They're
okay. You gotta stop this. Illegals are okay
as long as we like them, and we
think they're
pathetic, guys.
Now why have I been critical of of,
secretary Noem? Because I don't think we're focusing
on we have limited resources.
Ice can't be everywhere at once.
There's very few people in this in Capitol
Hill that support law enforcement more than me,
including the sworn ice officers.
In fact, I've just been told, fortunately, in
about a week and a half, we're gonna
get a plaque on the wall over the
Capitol thanking the Capitol Police officers and all
the agencies that responded on January 6. All
those thugs have actually been pardoned, and yet
we haven't thanked
the Capitol Police officers for their work here.
So when I say I'm unapologetically
pro law enforcement, you can count in every
single sworn officer in Homeland Security. So why
am I disappointed with secretary Noem?
Because we're not going after enough people who
did this damage
at the expense of running numbers that Stephen
Miller wants out of the White House.
We just want numbers.
We want a thousand a day, 6,000 a
day, 9,000 a day because numbers matter. Right?
You see,
it's obvious
because that's what's happening.
Everyone knows it,
but you get the lying people online, the
Joneses and the Ben and John that lie
to you. They just scream the lie because
that's their job.
But everybody knows it because we're not stupid,
and we're if anybody's honest, it would seem
to be the majority of people but aren't
represented in the fake conversation, see it.
Because how many times can we see the
American part of it or the innocent more
people showing up for their legal meetings who
get thrown into a van and never reappear
over and over before it's just obvious.
Or the beginning part, like, El Salvador and
the plane they set, which most of them
were not criminals. Most of them were here
legally. That's the reality, guys, from day one.
Khalil Ozturk. Come on. Even Garcia, how that
look at where that ended up. We just
peep that's why they don't talk about it,
guys, because he's free here.
Think about how embarrassing that is for what
they're doing. They lied about him. Even Trump
thought he was right about the MS thirteen
of the knuckles. No. He was wrong. He
thought that was a real picture because, clearly,
I think Stephen Miller played him. That's what
I think now.
And he's telling you, Stephen Miller just wants
to know, and she went with it because
they're all just go along to get along
people, guys. They don't know what they're doing.
Right? No. They don't matter. Quality matters. Not
quantity, quality.
And what we've seen is a disaster.
Under your leadership, miss Noam, a disaster.
What we've seen
is innocent people getting detained that turn out
our American citizens. I could talk about the
culture that's been created here with with Stephen
Miller aiding and abetting. Mhmm. I heard first
reports that he was the one that said
it was a domestic terrorist situation where two
people lost their lives in Minneapolis.
See how that works out? So it all
turns out from the inside information that Miller
was the one that drove that narrative. Funny
how that works out. Let's not forget this
guy is quite literally fighting for Israel's agenda
at the expense of American interest. Every single
thing he's doing is bringing this country to
the lowest common denominator.
The worst of human traits in every way,
he's doing it right now with the current
conversation. That's who he is. He's trying to
convince you that, you know, not pull like,
just killing whoever you can or there's no
there's nothing out. We're not gonna fight woke
wars. What does that even mean? He's talking
about killing whoever they can whenever they can
because they're all evil bad people. Children, it
doesn't matter. Like Hamas and Gaza and and
Israel, they're all evil people. That's what he's
doing.
And you have plenty of MAGA people out
there going, who cares about international law? We
we have to do what we have to
do.
And that's not even the same as saying
you have to care about international law or
that there's you maybe you have a different
opinion on how it could function, but it
is the current reality, and they use it
against their adversaries every single day.
And here they are going, who cares? Because
Iran has the thing we can prove they
don't.
And he knows that.
I've heard that report. Maybe you can refute
it. I don't know that we'll have time
for you to respond because I've given you
a performance evaluation here. I'm not looking for
a response.
And I'm saying, miss Noam,
that time after time after time, I've been
disappointed. But before I get back
to looking at the vicious people that did
this damage to these families,
I wanna talk a minute about FEMA.
By the way, sitting in the in the
in the seats, are people with pictures of
their of their
siblings and family that are were deported, abused.
I mean,
good and and pretty were killed. It's not
a secret.
You have a policy right now that anything
over a 100,000
has to go through your desk for approval.
I asked my staff This is why. A
management consultant. I don't try to do cheap
shots in here, but the the facts do
not lie.
This is your administration
for FEMA response.
This is president Trump's first administration.
So check this out, guys, for the podcast.
This is absolutely insane.
And this to me is scream this is
corruption. This is this is what I think
is what with everything we're dealing with right
now are people in this administration who don't
understand
that they're not this is they they they
thought they'd get away with it. Per Trump
probably swore they would always he'd always have
their back until he just doesn't want to
anymore. That's how that works. They need to
pay attention better.
Or they're just so desperate for power, they're
willing to take their chances. But the point
is you can see them, all of them.
Hegseth and Noam and Bondi. They're so, so
far out of their depth. Kash Patel, Bongino.
What a sad display.
And the reality is that they're all I
think they're all trying to profiteer. And, like,
Cash just seems to wanna hang out with
his people that are cool. Like, that's how
see, that's what he seems like, doesn't he?
He just wants to feel like he's on
the top of the pyramid for a minute.
That's just pathetic. But everybody else, like, no
one, the rest, they seem like they're profiteering.
They seem like they're trying to gain and
absorb. And I think why? Because they see
Trump doing it. And they're not smart enough
to recognize that's not just the normal thing.
As we're gonna get to, it's like the
Trump administration sort of owning what they're doing
with the Kurds. Is that because Trump doesn't
realize that you're not supposed to say that
part out loud? Because that they well, then
they do it in Syria? Well, yeah. But
they didn't tell us until we figured it
out. I genuinely wonder that. And is that
Israel doing that to everybody? I don't know.
But what I do know is that that
to me
is is corruption. She's stealing. And that's the
next point video we're gonna play. For the
podcast, the bottom line, basically, really low straight
line on the graph is Trump's first administration
for FEMA.
The second one demonstrating
Noam's
part of this is
way halfway up the graph and jumping up
and down all over the place. It just
the comparison is insane.
And when we're gonna get to the point
about the next company, the millions and millions
of dollars that went to a company that
doesn't exist,
they all they did was move her to
a new position.
Boy where's the money? What happened?
Corruption.
And let's not forget, on top of all
of that, we have examples of of Tom
Homan, the bag of money. We have examples
of Gabbard holding back an investigation about Jared
Kushner. Guys, this is wild where we are.
Naked corruption.
Which one would you like to have? If
you're a state that has a $60,000,000,000
disaster,
your biggest disaster in South Dakota that I
can tell that when you were an elected
official was about a half $1,000,000,000.
So one one hundredth of this single storm
where thousands of people are hurting in North
Carolina
and you're just barely catching up.
This is what competent FEMA leadership looks like.
This is what incompetent FEMA leadership looks like,
and people are hurting in Western North Carolina
from the most significant storm they've ever experienced.
This is what we need more of. I'm
convinced you can't do it. If you're requesting
a review of a $100,000
and up, then it begs the question why.
Why would you be involved in that? Why
would that be a policy? And in a
minute, I'll ask about some people that are
involved, some special government employees. Why are they
involved in it?
Thank you.
Senator
No. That 100 You can finish. That $100,000
only had to do And I do I
will hold the clock until I finish. Okay.
The bottom line is You you wanna see
a difference?
Notice how she doesn't scream over the top
of the Republican.
Right?
But you can have justice valid points coming
from a democrat, and she will feel the
screen. And you'll see it sort of in
the other one too. But she's much more
reserved in this one because you know what?
She knows she's screwed. You I mean, you
could tell by the way she's her demeanor
has changed. The first time, Bondi and her,
it was like watching some guy some high
school girl scream at people. It's embarrassing for
everybody.
But here okay. Okay. She stands back.
Being told to talk. It's just very different,
isn't it?
I've done the analysis,
and you could say whatever you want to.
I've worked with the Democrat governor. I've worked
with the Republican governor. I've worked with fiscal
research. We have people contacting my office now
to get the information to to better understand
the failure of this department.
You failed at FEMA. And in fact, if
I get to it actually, why don't I
cover this right now? The Homeland Security Act
of 2002
expressly prohibits the Secretary of Homeland Security
from restricting or diverting FEMA resources from the
agency's mission.
Based on your disaster response, the chart that
I just showed you, I have reason to
believe that you're violating the law, either knowingly
or unknowingly.
So I'll be asking and getting us Violating
the law, which you should already know by
now. It's pretty obvious.
But that's a this isn't a congressional here.
You he just accused her of breaking the
law. And it's and both and I mean,
this is two I'm gonna show you of,
like, a whole string of this kind of
stuff going on the entire time.
And what's happening? You see my point as
always, guys? Is there an investigation going on?
Is this man gonna maybe. I hope so.
But watch as nothing happens. I hope I'm
wrong. As all this comes out like it
does every time, and they move her to
some weird position, which we're not gonna touch
on today, tomorrow, and get into it, the
Shields of America. And what a joke. What
an embarrassment
to just move her away
and no investigation even as the I mean,
why would the Democrats go screaming after her?
They might.
But my point isn't hip whether that happens
or not, it almost never amounts to anybody
being held accountable because that's the operate. That's
the mafiosos
enforcing on themselves. It only happens when they
have to make an example. The rest of
it, no one gets no. You break the
law just the right way, everything works out.
I mean, tell me. I it's the same
point with Trump. You could argue all day
how many times somebody had just going after
all they went after and they weaponized the
law. Yeah. They do. That's our government. They
weaponized the law everywhere. What do you think
Trump's doing right now to all of his
adversaries? We can't do this for, like, naive
about it. The point though is that what
happened?
Or did he go to jail?
Money exchanged hands. They always does. But did
somebody go to jail? I don't money doesn't
mean anything to me when these are billionaires.
Did they get held accountable? They go to
jail. They charged with a crime. No. I
mean, even Trump with regard with regard to
the rape case. They literally found him guilty.
But what happened?
I'm not even gonna say that I know
that's the truth because it seems like there's
a lot of things flying around back and
forth. They're just wise, but nobody ever goes
to jail.
Not Pelosi, not Obama, not Biden. I mean,
not any of these people. Didn't I mean,
how many of them have to tell you,
oh, it's all coming down. Just get just
keep Trump alive, Jones told you, and they're
all going to jail
over and over and over. I'm sorry. I
digress. I just
you know, I get these I get these
moments, these shows where it's just like, oh,
god. It's crazy. You know? We're in we're
in some kind of twilight zone, how people
can't see how clear this is. And look,
I know that happens a lot for people.
Like, you know, that you get these you
know, where people feel like things are clear
and the other side doesn't see it. COVID
was obvious. But even with COVID nineteen, I
think we're at a moment now that's
in my experience, this is unprecedented
to the to the degree that we're seeing
it. It's not like a nuance. It's just
blatantly lying, and the team holds the line.
But it's not holding is my point. Most
Republicans, I think, are starting to see this.
Submit submission to the rec record, sub submitting
a question for the record, what the total
amount of FEMA reimbursements are currently being held
by DHS
awaiting for final approval?
Held by
DHS awaiting for final approval for an agency
that you should not be obstructing,
the disbursement on. I'm gonna give you time
to answer to it under penalty of perjury
so that we can get it right.
Now
going back to Minneapolis,
why can't we just say we made a
mistake?
I will ask you one question if you
could just give me a quick response. Who
does Tom Homan work for?
You or the president? The president. Okay.
Why is that? Because I believe the president
recognized that you weren't getting it done in
Minneapolis, and you're putting us further away from
pointing to this. We're beginning to get the
American people to think that deporting people is
wrong. It's the exact opposite. Now think about
that point for a second.
I know there are plenty of people that
that argue that it shouldn't happen or disagree,
but, you know, that it might be getting
into what the opinion should be. My opinion
there, the reality of the law as it
currently stands. That's the way this point needs
to be taken for the moment because it's
not about disagreeing about the point. It's about
how they're playing in it. Right? And so
the reality is the law currently as it
is because, you know, I I don't believe
in statism. This is a whole different conversation.
But in this point, people who are here
illegally can be deported. I mean, that's always
been the reality.
And so what what he's talking about is
that by through their actions of deporting people
who are here legally,
you're creating this error that all of it
is is wrong. Now in some places, people
actually believe that. They agree with that. But
from the sense of people who saw the
who were in the middle, who just realized
the law can be applied, but there's problems
you know, or ways it could be abused,
are going to the point to where any
of it's wrong. And so, in a way,
you I you should ask whether somehow that's
by design. We're you know, whenever when we're
guided away like that, you wonder. But either
way, he's frustrated
because he believes in these things, at least
as it seems. And so he wants it
to happen. And so somebody like her who's
screaming about, we need this to happen, is,
in fact, hurting that agenda from a Republican
perspective.
I mean, you just can't get past how
broken this all is. And I think, again,
it's not about sides. It's about the fact
that Noem and and all the rest, and
just the same as Biden did everybody else
before, but just in a more extreme agree,
they're just
trying to get what they can. Like, in
it's almost as if they see a sinking
ship, and they're just trying to load themselves
up to take what they can before they
jump off.
That's what it feels like.
The way you're going about deporting them is
wrong. The fact that you can't admit to
a mistake, which looks like under investigation, it's
gonna prove that miss Good and mister Priddy
probably should not have been shot in the
face and in the back. Probably. Enforcement needs
to learn from that. You don't protect them
by not looking after the facts. Not only
should the FBI be investigating it, but every
single law enforcement agency in that jurisdiction should
be invited to it. Isn't it frustrating how,
you know, you get all these screaming people?
You know, the James Woods types out there
that act like they're so hot. They come
out and just
aggressively try to convince you that that's ridiculous.
You know what I mean? At the end,
why would anybody argue against making sure we
have all the facts? Because they're not honest
people.
Simple. So our law enforcement officers do not
have this podcast upon them. One of the
reasons why ICE officers are having threats and
and damn the people that threaten ICE officers
because so many of them are doing a
good job is because you've cast a pall
on them by acting like we should investigate
things differently.
And realize that they'd already did. And look,
they don't need Noam. Oh, I mean, you
could argue that it's her presence and what
they've done, maybe Trump, that's guided this this,
you know,
culture in the in ice right now, which
is insane.
It is it is anti American.
It's authoritarian.
But the point is that you could argue
that that's, what was it again? Hold on.
Oh, shoot.
Not only should the FBI be investigating, law
enforcement officers do not have this podcast
upon them. Oh, right. Right. That that ultimately,
well, before that I mean, look. We've covered
it for years about the abuse of law
enforcement, but that it's the what we've seen
in this administration, it could be just because
of her, but they don't need her dishonesty
on top of it to make you see
what you know, to put them whatever you
know, to put them in a bad light.
It's obvious what they're doing. Again, if we're
just being not objective, nonpartisan people.
One of the reasons why ICE officers are
having threats and and damn the people that
threaten ICE officers because so many of them
are doing a good job it's because you've
cast a poll on them by acting like
we should investigate
things differently. Officer involved shootings have a formula
that we should go through every time, and
we're not going through that formula. As a
matter of fact, in miss Goode's case, I
think that they were even saying that maybe
there wasn't even a need to do it
in the DOJ. I hope that that's changed.
But I'm telling you, it was a civil
rights review. I saw your frown. You could
you can correct me if I'm wrong. But
originally, Blanche said there wouldn't be an investigation.
Folks, law enforcement, we've gotta have their back.
We've gotta make it clear when they make
a mistake, then they get corrected for it.
But you don't walk away from it, and
you've done it too many times. Think about
saying there wouldn't be an investigation.
Like, even as standard operating procedure, whether or
not you think it's clear, there always has
been.
Every moment, this is just shameless examples of
corruption
covering up. Doesn't matter because, you know, even
if you think it's their mind and maybe
they're being played, that they think that, well,
if we put this, if we do it,
the democrats will manipulate it, probably. The point
is at the end of the day, they're
all doing that. The evidence, the information still
need the process is still there. You know,
this is where you ends up where you
get in this position where we acknowledge everything
so completely corrupt and broken. And you can
clearly make a lot of examples for why
that's happening. But it doesn't mean you stop
doing the thing that needs you know, this
is the same as arguing that, well, no
president's declared war, so let's just stop doing
it. No. That's how is that the right
answer to go further in the wrong direction,
but yell constitution, freedom, liberty? You just you
guys are pathetic. Anybody making these illogical, contradicting
arguments are just either they don't understand why
that's wrong, which is mind blowing, or they're
not honest about this.
Now,
secretary,
I read your book last week.
And, honestly, some of the parts of it
impressed me, but some of it distresses me.
And I'll give you a good example of
one that does.
The passage where you talk about killing a
dog
that was 14
old. I train dogs. Alright?
And you are a farmer. You should know
better. You should know that if you're going
out to a hunting lodge and you're putting
pheasants out and you're putting dogs out, you
don't take a puppy out there. A 14
old dog is basically a teenager in dog
years. You decided to kill that dog because
you had not invested the appropriate time in
training, and then you have the audacity to
go into a book and say it's a
leadership lesson
about tough choices.
It's in your book. We could play it
if we had time. At that same lunch
hour, you killed a goat,
and you killed the goat because you said
it was behaving badly. You are a farmer.
You don't castrate a goat, they behave badly.
You should have probably done that before, but
my point is
those are bad
decisions
made in the heat of the moment, not
unlike what happened up in Minneapolis.
I expect we're an exceptional nation.
And one of the reasons we're exceptional is
we expect exceptional leadership.
And you've demonstrated anything but that in the
time that I've seen you responding to the
emergency in North Carolina and across the Southeast
and acknowledging
when mistakes are made and speaking too soon
for the expedient of social media or whatever
it is.
I'll leave you with this with this administration,
all of them, as came out about Cash
and Bongino
after that major event that all they were
talking about is how they were gonna map
out their Twitter conversation.
They people called them out their own people.
Expose that.
Because their own people are people that actually,
in some degree, know what they're doing, and
they're being led by a bunch of morons
that have never been in those positions. It's
embarrassing. Think about how you how that it's
like getting a new boss that you know
doesn't know how to do your job.
That's gotta be pretty that's I I've been
there. That's frustrating.
But just, you know, think about how the,
Seeing you responding to the The the Twitter
like, the way that they've continued
to care more about I mean, Trump, that's
what I think again. It all stems from
what they see Trump doing. They're just it's
all about social media and dictating the narrative
about
aside from actual action.
You know? And, like, in general, guys, like,
I this I'm I'm of the mind that
this is probably happening because it was decided
before this even started that she was gonna
be fired, that they just knew that she
was problematic and dumb and whatever else, and
this was, you know, a perform a performance.
But either way, it's think about it's important
to see the the contradiction from a Republican
about who is that Trump was telling you
twenty seconds ago that she was the best
person for the job.
So was he lying then? Probably.
Either way, it doesn't matter. It's about giving
you what you need to hear in the
moment.
See in North Carolina and across the Southeast
and acknowledging
when mistakes are made and speaking too soon
for the expedient of social media or whatever
it is.
I'll leave you with this, miss Noam.
I'm expecting answers to Charlotte's Web.
I requested it a month ago.
That was one of the investigations in Charlotte,
twenty minutes from where I live.
All I asked for, if it had to
be anonymized,
was information so that I could determine if
your hit rate is right. I wanna find
more of those people, and I wanna detain
fewer of the others.
And mister pres or mister chair, in my
remaining time, I have a lot to go.
But I wanna submit this letter from the
office of inspector general that cites 10 different
instances under miss Noem's leadership
where they've been misled and not allowed to
pursue investigations that they think are critically important.
See, stuff like this. Right? Even though, like,
I Gary, I was probably all performative.
And because she still hasn't been removed. She's
in a different position now, probably with somehow,
however knows why, more influence.
But what he just said is important, that
they've been with they've been holding back investigations
like the Gabbard point with it's not the
same that's not involved in this, but the
Gabbard point with Jared Kushner. Like, that that's
happening all over the place. Or who knows?
Maybe that's one of the ones he's referencing,
and she was involved with that too. The
reality is that they're they're hiding things. They're
covering things up. They're withholding investigation like Good
and Pretty and whatever else.
The fact that this is being done by
the performative or not, it still shows you
that they're willing to I mean, it's all
as always, guys, they're trying to throw her
under the bus to keep the game going,
if that's what you think is happening. But
either way,
look, where are all the people, all of
this ridiculous partisan influences out there that were
yelling down your throat about how she was
the best ever are now the ones going,
yeah. I get somebody back. You know, it's
it's it's it's just about
moving along to the next point. That's why
it's so I'll get to some of those
examples of the types I'm always pointing to,
where they're over here going, never war with
Iran. I'll never allow that. If they do
it, I'm gonna leave the MAGA movement. And
then here they are going, yay. War for
Iran. It's just like he's always promised.
And they leave both up.
Like, you they know that. Right? It's just
it's about the masses. They're not even trying
to look honest.
Does anybody have any idea
how bad it has to be for the
OIG in this agency to come out and
do this publicly?
That is stonewalling. That's a failure of leadership,
and that is why I've called for your
resignation. Terminality. And if I don't get an
answer to these questions,
I don't want an applause. Please don't do
that for me. If I don't get an
answer to these questions, if I don't get
an answer that you've had a month to
respond to and the remaining ones,
as of today, I'll be informing leadership that
I'm putting a hold on any en bloc
nominations
until I get a response. And in two
weeks, if I don't get a response, I'm
gonna deny quorum and markup in as many
committees as I can until I get a
response.
Thank you, mister chair. Okay. Now watch as
that happens. The time passes and nothing goes
on.
I hope not.
But he was real strong. He was real
passionate. Oh, you get two weeks and you
better. Okay. Well, let's wait and see. How
long until Trump talks to him and goes,
hey. Back up. Okay. I mean, seriously, like,
this is the same thing every time. No.
There's that's my point in saying during it.
There's importance to showing it. In some cases,
I rarely do it anymore because it just
takes so much time. But I felt this
one had there was importance to
it. Not because he's honest or whatever else,
but because that they're revealing these things to
you because they're desperate. Because she is so
incompetent, they had to go this route. At
the end of the day, guys, it just
breaks down all of what's happening, and they're
all right before this, they were all holding
the line. It's just it's very clear. And
so is it about
you know, anyway, there's just so many ways
you could make this. I'm just hoping that
this is, you know, really breaking through for
people, and that it when he doesn't follow-up
and she's not held accountable,
it makes the point. Hope I'm
wrong. Oh, and on top of that, there
there's an example of in one of these
videos where they're they bring up a big
sign about her advertisement, and she's on this
horse, and she makes all these allegations about
how it was totally up and and then
basically Trump comes out and says, he didn't
sign off on it at all. So it
just shows you that this is this was
yesterday, that he's already going, no. No. No.
Screw that. She's gone. I'm not even gonna
I and I guarantee you, he was always
like, I got your back. I got your
back. And the moment that it mattered,
done, in my opinion. Like they do, like
they all do, by the way. Now, here's
this one, which I think is important as
well. Again, same points apply. It's about exposing
the criminality. But realize, this one, guys, this
has to go beyond just her. It has
to in my mind. But even if it
doesn't, it's no different than I think anybody
else in these government positions
in a majority sense. Like, who knows individually,
but as a as a government body, this
is common practice. We see this with the
stock manipulations. I mean, this is but this
goes away a level beyond. This feels as
if she literally set up a fake company
in order to create a situation where she
could profit.
There's also an example I don't think is
in this one where McLaughlin, the the former,
whatever she was, assistant,
ultimately, she ended up giving millions
to her and her husband
with, like, a no bid contract for some
new thing they were doing when
there's plenty of other valid companies. I mean,
it was just it's clearly corruption, guys. And
you're benefiting her because she got pushed off
the team, and now you I mean, just
gross. Gross corruption.
Back in, it was a consent request from
the gentleman from Texas. Yeah. Mister chairman, I
asked your name's consent to insert the record
article from the, Hill Country Community Journal, Kerrville's
hometown paper,
outlining in his title, Christy Noem
Let me make sure I didn't get the
wrong speech. Under federal law, you're
count steering Texas
and his title, Christy Noem joins governor in
support of Kerr community towards areas of destruction,
from last summer. I was personally there. Objection.
Secondly, I'd like to insert into the record
an article titled Trump recounts daring Texas flood
rescue reunites camper with coast guard swimmer at
State of the Union,
for the record, and I thank the secretary.
Objection. The gentleman from Colorado is recognized. Thank
you, mister chairman. Good afternoon, madam secretary.
I thank you for being here. I wanna
discuss in greater detail
the expansion of advertising
in your department under your tenure. And I
believe you testified regarding some of these matters
yesterday in front of the United States Senate.
In particular, I wanna discuss
the department's $200,000,000
$220,000,000
ad campaign.
This is the ad campaign that, featured you
at Mount Rushmore. You're familiar with this ad
campaign. Correct? I am familiar with it. It
was an ad campaign that was I'm gonna
ask you some questions about it, madam secretary.
So Okay.
As I understand it, this is a $220,000,000
ad campaign.
It's split between two contractors.
One of those contractors got a $143,000,000.
That contractor is called SafeAmerica
Media. Correct?
Correct. Okay.
That company is affiliated
with a
former political director
of the National Republican Congressional
Committee.
Now yesterday, you testified I think I'm quoting
you right. You said, quote, or in reference
to this contract,
that, quote, it went out to a competitive
bid.
Do you stand by that statement?
It was a no bid contract where two
vendors were It was a no bid contract.
Would have been a if it would have
been
a no bid contract, if I'm using that
correctly, it would it goes out to two
different vendors. Correct. So it was not a
competitive
let me let me try to explain Let
me see. What the discrepancy.
Because
a competitive bid is very different than a
no no no competitive bid, and I'll just
explain why. We know
that your testimony yesterday I really hope that
she's playing dumb because that's even more alarming,
by the way, that she's, like, not even
aware of the what that means, but she
could be playing dumb.
When you said,
again, I'll quote,
it went out to a competitive bid is
untrue.
The reason we know it's untrue
is because under federal law, your agency is
required
whenever the agency decides to skip competitive bidding
to file a notice with the public explaining
why. And in this case And that's to
avoid possible corruption. Right? Because, you know, why
would why wouldn't you be you know, why
would you give it to the one person
without any due diligence? Right? That's obvious.
Your agency filed a notice. Right. You're aware
of that. Right.
Right? Justification and approval for other than full
and open competition.
So the point is first that she lied
about that publicly.
Your agency
made a decision
not to proceed
with competitive bidding,
and one of the contractors
that got the award was this Safe America
Media company
that received a $143,000,000.
Now as this goes forward, you're gonna see,
as I was discussing, that this seems to
not even exist. So the real question is,
what is it and where did it go?
Which I'm hoping will flesh out with people
investigating this. The reality though, how is this
I mean, there's very similar feelings to this
with
the Biden Ukraine overlaps. There are plenty of
other examples.
This is the way our government actually operates.
And until we come to terms with that,
this won't change because both sides do it.
Many vendors got the chance to look at
that contract and to participate in it. Well
So that is why the two of them
were That's correct. Madam madam secretary, I'll read
from the notice from your agency. Given the
immediate action to significantly reduce illegal immigration and
border crossings, DHS invited excuse me, identified
four companies. Mhmm.
Four. Of the hundreds of thousands of companies
in The United States, you identified
four. One of those is this SafeAmerica Media
company. Where is SafeAmerica Media headquartered?
I don't know. I don't know either, madam
secretary. We can't find it. We can't find
a website.
We did find an address
that's registered for this company. Do you know
where that address is?
Is there a problem with this contract? I'll
tell you about it. According to the law.
By federal official. Registered to a political dollars
that was Madam secretary, the the company, and
I'll give you an option to respond. The
company is registered to a political
operative
in Virginia.
Do you know, just by way of example,
whether this company that received a $143,000,000
in taxpayer
dollars, has it ever done work for the
government before? Now watch Virginia,
you know, CIA potentially, point.
Watch as that ends up being something connected
to Israel
in some way through intelligence.
It wouldn't surprise me.
I don't know. I can't The answer is
it has not. And do you know why
we know that? Because it was in Virginia.
Do you know,
just by way of example, whether this company
that received a $143,000,000
in taxpayer dollars, has it ever done work
for the government before? I don't know. I
can't The answer is it has not. And
do you know why we know that? Because
it was incorporated eight days
eight days before
this contract went out.
You want the American people to believe Eight
days. That this is all above board Yes,
sir. That a $143,000,000
of taxpayer money just happened to go to
this one company that doesn't have a headquarters,
doesn't have a website, has never done work
for the federal government before, and is registered
apparently or attached to a residence
from a political operative. And, of course, one
of the subcontractors
of that contract, as you know, is a
political firm that's tied to to you
back when you were governor of South Dakota.
Guys,
I mean, think about how insane that is.
And the idea that I think this is
her
expecting this would never happen.
Right? I mean, how do you think that's
not if if there's any honesty now, here's
the point. Most of these people are probably
doing similar things. I don't think she ever
expected it. One, because Trump probably said she'd
back her, but also because
I I think that other people like, the
I think the old the point becomes that
she didn't expect others to call her out
for things she probably knows others are doing.
But the reality is she did it in
a way that was so clumsy and obvious.
That's the mafioso point. They can't allow somebody
to go out and just execute somebody in
broad daylight because that exposes the game. So
should they get taken out by the other
mafia? That's the whole point. You go back
to the idea that they enforce amongst themselves
as our government.
The reason why I ask these questions
is that this is taxpayer
money.
And
I presume,
I don't know this for a fact, that
senator Tillis noted yesterday
the way in which your agency is blocking
the inspector general from I just have to
point out as somebody rightly points out in
the chat because super important. Right? So, you
know, hey. Hey. Hey. Hey. Heads up. The
guy didn't clearly hasn't heard the Dow was
above fifty fifty k. Right? Who's stopped paying
attention? Thanks, Bonnie.
And by the way, after she said that,
it went down a bunch, but went back
up, which is funny.
11 different investigate
I don't know this for a fact, but
senator Tillis noted yesterday the way in which
your agency is blocking the inspector general from
11 different investigations that it is trying to
conduct. I don't know if this happens to
be one of them. I certainly hope it
is because eventually, the facts
will become public in this regard. So what
I'm saying is that it pipe it's it's
possible, likely, I would argue, that one of
those 11 is her the case that knowing
she's breaking the law. So she's in this
position withholding the investigation into her fraudulent actions.
But watch as the as Mullen, who's clearly
gonna be the next guy, who I was
gonna talk about a lot today but I
put it off till tomorrow because my god,
that guy is stupid. I can't believe that
we're talking about her to him like that's
some kind of a benefit.
It's just bad. I'm gonna enjoy going through
some of these clips of him just making
an absolute fool of himself as I'm sure
everyone has seen. The guy who literally stood
up and tried to fight somebody in congress
because that's where this country is going.
There are serious laws
implicated, conflict of interest laws, federal procurement laws
that I believe merit.
All done correctly. All done all done correctly.
14,000,000,000
impressions from that marketing campaign.
Sure. It was money spent in this country
and in eight different countries that illegal migration
was coming from overwhelmingly
effective. We all understand the argument that you've
made, the argument that you've made that somehow
this ad campaign
on Fox News of you at Mount Rushmore
has led to millions of people self deporting.
You're using
millions of dollars to tax people. Had they
not known it? In this way, it is
fraud, and ultimately, I think there's gonna be
accountability. And I yield back them. Can I
speak to the IG? Yes. You can. Go
The IG has been told repeatedly, in writing,
verbally, on the phone, that he can have
access to anything at the Department of Homeland
Security. He can. He doesn't need my permission
to come and brief members of Congress on
the Hill. He just needs to provide a
scoping memo, which is what every single IG
gets from every single,
department and agency. All intelligence agencies require scoping
memo. He just hasn't done that. He wants
unfettered access to every single thing in the
department, and that's not the process, and that's
not any other IG has demanded that.
So isn't it funny how it starts by
all you gotta do is send me that
memo, but then we we told them no.
Well done, Noam. You're really, really setting yourself
up for success. The reality is obvious. It
is and that's why she's no longer in
the position because they know it's obvious, and
that's dangerous for them. So here we are.
It's it's wild. I mean, seriously, I could
there's so many more examples we could get
into. Now it's really worth, like, in your
mind, like, relitigating every situation she was involved
in. Look at all the times she was
lying. Look at all the times she was
being corrupt, who's dishon so to all of
them if you really wanna break it down.
But think about that. Think about all the
times they covered for her, all the times
they lied, and apply that to Bondi. It's
the same point. Hegseth,
Cash, Pongino,
the whole damn thing, guys. It's quite clear
where we are. Now a point to include
in the kind of in the partisan side
of this, I didn't get a chance to
go over this in-depth just because I put
it off, but I I include,
oh, it's right here. I include the the
point of
the invest the indictment discussion about Del C.
Rodriguez in in Venezuela. And I'm still not
even sure on where I place her in
this.
But interesting that on the fourth, here's what
Trump puts out. Del C. Rodriguez. And remember,
this is the person currently in charge of
Venezuela because, I guess,
they they kidnapped Maduro in the middle of
the night and then decided she was okay
to be president, but they call that democracy.
And it says, who is the president of
Venezuela is doing a great job. And working
with US representatives very well, the oil is
being getting to flow.
And the professionalism and dedication between both countries
is a very nice thing to see. Great.
So the the the the thing that's working
is that we're we're taking oil. But we're
doing it for Venezuela even though we're exploiting
the country.
Well, it's every single country they're involved with.
But here's what's funny to me.
This is posted on the this or this
one's the fifth, the next day.
Rapid response. United States and Venezuela interim authorities
have agreed to reestablish diplomatic and consular relations.
Well, what's funny is in between the conversation,
now that they're saying, now we're okay. Now
we're good to go back into the, you
know, standing diplomatic week. Because before, that hadn't
technically happened. Well, is that here's the article
you can read for yourself that breaks down
what was going on in between that, which
is ultimately, this is the third,
US turns up heat on Venezuela with threat
to indict her.
So this is just sober this is exactly
like every situation I've seen from this government,
left or right, which, as I write, Trump
secretly threatened corruption legal charges
to get here.
It's strong arming.
It makes one of the two possibilities very
clear.
Either they are corrupt, Delcee Rodriguez and the
people around her, and as long as they
play ball and do what Trump wants, meh,
no charges. Right? Or
they're not corrupt,
and he's willing to lie about them to
coerce them into a position. You there's probably
one or the other. Right? And both those
are ridiculous. It's like Somalia or yeah. It
was Somalia. And the point was I've said
many times over the years
or was it
Sudan? I'm sorry. It was the Sudan. And
what they said is and I now I
feel like it could be one either way,
it's the same point. I believe it was
The Sudan. The the government of Israel was
trying to normalize with all these groups, which
really means they just control the government, it
seems. And Trump was trying to force them.
And so what they say? Well, hey. We'll
remove you off the states the the the
state terrorism list if you normalize with Israel.
And so what did I say? Okay. Well,
that only means one or two things because
they're in a material sense, they were exactly
the same as what they were when they
called them terrorists. So
the the point is either they were never
terrorists and they were using that to coerce
them to join to normalize with Israel, or
they were terrorists and they were okay with
that as long as they normalized with Israel.
You really can't misunderstand these things. So, basically,
Donald Trump over here going, we're doing great,
is behind the scenes going, you're we're gonna
throw you in jail if you don't let
me do whatever I want with Venezuela, and
also calling that democracy for the Venezuelan people.
And here we are. And so, because she
wants to stay in power, hey. Now we're
back to diplomatic relations, and Trump can go,
look. We're doing great without you reading the
information that he you know, it's all right
there. It's just it's pathetic, guys.
Angry over White House's war Iran war video
cut together with Call of Duty clip. So
Donald Trump's administration puts out this video,
which is insane, really. It's a video
of the what they're doing and, you know,
whatever what they're putting out about Iran. And
within that video, I believe is it right
here?
No. This is the second one. So anyway,
the point was they put this clip out.
And in this clip,
there was
Call of Duty footage.
Now it doesn't seem I can't tell whether
or not this was I mean, I who
knows how dumb they are? It's obvious, I
think, that this is footage from something, but
maybe they thought you wouldn't know. I don't
think that's the reality, but it's worth noting
that. I've seen them do that before. Israel's
got caught doing that during October 7 forward,
war positions where they ultimately put out a
video that they claim was them, but it
turned out to be some, you know, fighter
jet from something else. In this case, the
point is they kinda got made fun of.
Well, first, mostly just going like I said,
war is not a game. Like, you guys
are ridiculous. You're juvenile.
You're teenagers,
what it seems,
using Call of Duty. I think it's really
more about trying to reach the lowest common
denominator. They want the younger generation to think
they're cool or to think this is what
war really is, and, like, they're that that's
what they're trying to change their reality into.
We're gonna get to what Miller and the
rest are saying. Hey, Seth. Rules of engagement
don't matter. You know, like, just literally driving
us new place where might makes right. I've
been telling you this.
So then, they put this out. And I
think this is what they do. They just
double down when they make when they've somebody
goes, that's stupid. They do it again.
Because they're they're childish. It's just what they
are. As they put this out, Operation Epic
Fury. Destroy Iran's missile arsenal. Destroy their navy.
Ensure they never get a nuclear bomb even
though everything they're doing is illegal because no
one's declared war and they've not met the
war powers resolution requirements. But who cares? Right?
And they just start with an image from,
a Grand Theft
Auto.
That's what they literally put this video on.
And then they show a a blowing up
a,
what looks like a,
excuse me, a, oil tanker or whatever it
is. And then showing busted or wasted from
from from rock from Rockstar Games.
I I just don't understand why anybody think
this is bad. It's just lame. It's it's
actually kind of cringey, if you want my
honest opinion. It's all trying to make it
silly. You're making nothing and really trying to
manipulate
low, you know, intelligence people, I think.
Yeah. I said, oh, this is what I
thought. They got caught using Call of Duty
footage at first until I think I saw
the the, other parts of it, but But
this is their clumsy way of making it
seem as if it was always on purpose.
That's just first thought I had.
Then do it again. This one's from the
sixth. Justice is justice the American way, they
write. Don't don't you dare stand up and
pretend that what you're doing represents America. How
embarrassing this is. What they're doing is childish
and juvenile and manipulative. But, yeah, it represents
American government. Sure. But this is hilarious because
they use all these clips. That's
Tropic Thunder,
Minority Report,
Braveheart.
And then here's Ben Stiller. Hey, White House.
Please remove the Tropic Thunder clip. We never
never gave you permission and have no interest
in being a part of your propaganda machine.
Moore is not a movie.
Now sure, all their MAGA people who are
blind followers are gonna go, You're a Democrat.
You're dumb. And whatever their stupid argument's gonna
be to ignore the point he's making. The
reality though, is that they've been asked to
her permission.
Why why is that? It's just hilarious to
me how that's something that they it's the
hubris.
They believe they can do whatever they want
because clearly no one's stopping them. So they'll
just they who cares? Right? I how much
you wanna bet even if they they won't
take it down no matter what? Even though
here's Trump making all these allegations about everybody
else, you know, not doing what they're supposed
to legally or how they're going after him.
And he does the same thing and just
stand because he's a hypocrite
like all the rest of them.
And there's plenty I can criticize about Ben
Stiller. He's a he's a partisan like the
rest. It's not the point. Ben Stiller is
not the point. It's what they're doing. And,
guys, quite frankly,
I think they're mocking you. I think this
is probably Israel mocking you, honestly, but you
guys can decide for yourself.
Here's some other partisan points.
Captive dreamer. God, this is everywhere. Here's here's
where he come out came out and said
back in '20 where was this one?
I forget. Oh, it doesn't show the date
that this is them calling him out. And
then you could find these for yourself. If
there's a single US drop boot dropped on
Iran during Trump's presidency,
I'll make a video denouncing the entire MAGA
movement.
Here it is today.
It doesn't even matter at this point. Of
course, there are no boots on the ground
in Iran. But even if there were, I
don't care anymore. I've been wary of foreign
invent intervention my whole life.
But at this point, as long as he
controls immigration, I don't care what happens. Oops.
Now he's okay with illegal immigrants. He'll still
probably side with them. There's no principle here,
guys. You don't have anything guiding you. It's
just whatever the team is that day. That's
sad.
That's not everybody.
And they said, imagine being a spineless, pathetic,
spineless, pathetic like this. They have no legitimate
beliefs of their own. They have no capacity
for independent thought. I'm not familiar with the
account,
but the point would be just like Democrats.
So it'd be humorous to me if this
person was the same way during COVID. Right?
This is how this tends to work. I
don't know. But I'm glad they're calling it
out because it is the case.
Here is Anomaly, who, by the way, I
could point out tons of examples, is hypocritical
in his own way in plenty of examples.
But he also has done good work in
plenty of examples.
But one of them was basically siding with
Trump and calling us black pillars and and
priority tests because and here we are. And
now they've and look. I'm not maybe he
now he sees it. Calls it out. Good.
But it's worth acknowledging, and he probably should
too, that that was part he was part
of the the push, the support to side
with him against Kamala and Biden when there
was all the same, and now they're doing
the worst thing ever. Come on. But aside
from that, he calls out Eric Dougherty.
He says, Serious question. Eric, how will you
live how how do you live with yourself?
You are a soulless propagandist. You mean you
nothing, you say. How do you not wake
up every morning and feel like an evil
sack of government mouth p I s h
I t?
Because he goes, War?
We'd be at war with Iran directly if
Kamala won in November. This is 2025.
Just think about what we avoided. We would
have already signed off on several strikes and
probably would have sent troops. It would have
been a nightmare
today. Breaking Trump.
House democrats, basically, Trump wins. House democrats' effort
to block what he's doing failed. This effort's
now lost both in the house and the
senate.
Bolden with strikes and devastation.
These people are ridic and my point is
this guy was a later latecomer in the
com but you see what they're doing. All
of them doing the same thing. Even and
this even makes it more clear.
The same exact formula. This is this is
them going around with that, marine who got
his arm broken, as we started with. Eric
says, holy crap.
Senator takes him out. Playing no games. You're
literally promoting this. You absolute.
I mean, just a hypocrite, clearly, but something
deserves a little more strong there. I mean,
you're just you have nothing sacred. But here's
another oh, this was actually this I think
that just got caught in the picture. Here
here's the other two. Nick Sorter,
because the other one wasn't the same statement.
These are exactly the same. Holy crap. US
Senator. Blah blah blah. It's the same thing.
Here's another one. Nick Sorter. Holy crap. US
Senator. Navy Seal.
Right? I mean, guys, they're the might as
well be the same person. Maybe they are.
It's this is dissident media. Holy crap. Wonder
what the odds are of this.
Exactly.
You can't see by now these are dishonest
people. They're gonna go along to get along
with everything. They wait, not even be real
as far as I'm concerned. But I've seen
Nick Sorter crying on TV when he got
caught in Lahaina when that guy called him
out for taking donations then using a five
star hotel. Remember that? I do.
But I agree. These people have nothing no
principles.
And then this guy goes, one of my
favorites. Here's Eric.
This person says, if Republicans take over the
House, who should be the speaker? And he
says, Massey.
And now he's out there telling you Massey's
the worst person alive because Trump doesn't like
that he's actually being consistent.
Massey.
But here's the kind of things we're getting,
and this is what they support. They're out
there right now going, look. I told you.
It's all because of Iran. Listen to this
for yourself. And this guy's is pathetic.
Not only because he's already made the case,
he's already said numbers about this, but now
it's just be but because he's just saying
things he knows aren't true.
Nobody believes this. It's all about trying to
push the line to manipulate the people listening
to you.
You know, when you see somebody walking down
the street
without their legs, without the arms Wait. Wait.
Wait.
Walking down the street without their legs. Okay.
Good way to start.
You know, when you see somebody walking down
the street
without their legs, without the arms, whose face
is
so badly
affected
and hurt.
They were in Syrian the Syrian war, bombed
by this government. They were in Israel, bombed
by Israel. They were in Afghanistan, bombed bombed
by this government. They were they were part
of the pager attack that Israel carried out.
White phosphorus in many places you've used them.
Which one, Trump?
It mostly came from
95%
Soleimani
and Iran. Are you And and we is
just painful.
Solemn most of them came from Soleimani, someone
who's been dead for years, who, by the
way, was involved with what you say thousands
of Americans were killed in. That's the reality.
What I think it was two, three thousand
what the actual number they claim is. Recently,
Trump was like, maybe millions. I don't know.
Insane.
What they're talking about, as I've said every
time, and this is actually provable based on
what they'll tell you, they claim they're terrorists
because when they illegally invaded Iraq, Soleimani, who
was supporting them, stood with them and fought.
And they've and they killed Americans while they
were illegally invading
based on WMD lies.
There's no way around that. And so it's
always carried forward. It's always been thousands. It's
the same point. They say he was responsible.
But then just Iran, apparently, now too. But
every time they talk about Iran, they just
say thousands because they're talking about the same
point.
So, you're gonna tell me that 95%
of anyone in this country who's got a
face mutilation, arms, legs missing, that it's ninety
five percent Soleimani
personally
and Iran?
You mean aside from all the Iraq veterans
who are the amputees or I mean, come
on, guys. It's just dumb. Yes. He I
I don't I'm even willing to bet that
he probably regretted saying that because it's even
dumb for him.
I just can't get past how crazy this
stuff is.
Yeah. You know, when you see somebody walking
down the street
without their legs, without the arms, his face
is so badly
affected and
hurt,
it Oh, and by the way, watch the
crowd behind him. Mostly came from
95%
Soleimani
and Iran,
and we
other presidents
lived with it. I didn't live with it.
And so What does that even mean?
You mean so how is that how did
you not live with it if you just
told us that's ubiquitous?
You see my point, guys? He's drowning in
this point. I feel like he just doesn't
even he's probably lost his place and starts
ad libbing and then through that's what happened.
How are you gonna say you didn't live
through it when you just said that's the
current reality?
Or are you suggesting that it was when
it happened, but that you see doesn't make
any sense?
Our people are doing a great job. Again,
the greatest military anyone's seen.
Thank you.
I see one guy clapping behind him, by
the way. I just think that's huge.
You know, it's these points like this that
I'm like this I think I wanna just
talk about this for two hours over and
over. This is effing
insane to me.
You might as well say that every single
injury we ever had in this country is
ninety five percent Iran. It's just as stupid,
and nobody should take it seriously. But watch
look for yourself. They'll all share it. They'll
put a flashy red light. Holy crap. Trump
just bombshell. Oh, mic drop every single time.
And maybe it's not even worth wasting time
on anymore. Maybe nobody believes it. Maybe this
but it's just this fake version of what
we all look at. I do believe that's
part of it because that's the thing. Holy
crap. Oh my god. We're the same person
doing the same thing, saying the same thing
about the same person. It's just painful.
Here's Ben Shapiro on the note of stupidity,
saying America is the worst terrorist organization in
the world
means you hate America, he says. Yeah. Very
very unique thought, Ben. You just take that
out of the government handbook.
And I said, no, bud. It means you
hate the government that has lied the nation
into these positions our entire lives.
And if you're claiming they are the same
thing, then you're both ignorant and manipulative
because the government is not the American people.
You represent the American people. In fact, they
don't, but that's the reality of the way
we claim it's supposed to work. And saying
that the American government or I mean, what
are you saying, Ben? Are we saying America
is is all the terrorist organization? That every
individual, the one born yesterday? That's about as
dumb as saying every Jew is a certain
thing. The obvious point is the the military
acting it out, which includes Americans through that.
But who's dictating that? The government. You see,
he's not stupid. In fact, I know Ben's
a reasonably intelligent person. He's just extremely manipulative
and very one-sided when it comes to a
one very particular conversation.
At the end of the day, the government
has done this, and we all know that.
I mean and and almost everybody I've ever
seen standing up and saying the American America
is the worst terrorist organization. Like, by the
way, he's referring to Dave Smith who just
said this.
You know exactly what he's talking about. Do
you think Ben David's calling me a terrorist?
No. He's calling the government that. This is
just dishonest.
That's what they do.
And Dave DeCamp points out before we get
into the Iran Israel overlap here, just a
larger part of the conversation,
more perfect union.
The Pentagon is about to ask Congress for
an estimated $50,000,000,000
in extra funds
for the war on Iran, per Reuters, on
top of everything we discussed. It just keeps
getting worse. And that money is going to
go to Israel, guys. It's not even a
secret.
And Dave says the same thing. What are
the chances that's gonna go to Israel? Well,
we already know where this goes. Because that's
the whole thing. They're the ones guiding this
as we're gonna get to in a minute.
Like, literally, Israel
chastising the US government for doing things without
their permission.
Glenn Glenn Glenn pointed Greenwald pointed it out.
I mean, and and they literally responded going,
okay. Okay. We we we'll wait for you.
I mean, think about how I mean, think
think of who Trump is. Right? His narcissism
is is the the the hubris,
and yet he's willing to let that be
seen that way.
How does that not show you everything?
Now on the
Greater Israel
oh, excuse me. Sorry. The the Technate oh,
no. Excuse me. The Greater North America Project
that that, Hegseth just announced. Let's make sure,
and of course, I'm being facetious when I
just did that, let's make sure we understand
that this is a long term plan.
This is not new. This is just their
effort. I mean, here's what I keep seeing
with these. There's people like us that are
screaming about this stuff happening. Greater Israel, the
technate technocracy, the greater the great reset, all
of it right now, in fact.
And even though they know we're all waving
our hands and going network or rather just
you know, I'm I'm really also focusing on
the network state discussion, but there's a lot
of conversation just about the Palantir connection. It's
the same point, by the way.
My point is that people are screaming about
this everywhere, the whole country,
and they still come out now
and announce the thing that basically proves that's
or rather, I would say proves, but very
much so continues to connect to that conversation.
So my question is, why would they be
so clumsy?
I don't think they're even making these choices.
I don't think they're the ones deciding whether
or not this happens.
Now, that's just my opinion, and I could
certainly be wrong. There's plenty of other options
you could pick, but I just continue to
see, like, I just don't it doesn't make
sense to me why they would continue to
do the thing that not only makes their
own people mad at them, but only not
only makes them look like they're hypocrites, but
also is in the interest of everything, but
is or rather is
not in the interest of the Americans. I
was gonna say it differently, but just and
why would they keep doing it?
I that's one of the clear possibilities, I
think. So here is what,
Chris put out.
Pete Eggseth, Trump has drawn the new strategic
map
from Greenland to the Gulf Of America.
We call this map the Greater North America
map. Well, weird.
Haven't we seen this before? In fact, I
should have grabbed that. I have it on
the the image today. Oh, it's right here.
Haven't we seen that map before? Oh, that's
right. It's the map of Greater North America.
Oh, no. Excuse me. They just crossed out
Technate and used it. That's what I did.
But the point is clearly, you're just taking
the map that has always been the home
base of the Technate that Elon's grandfather was
involved with, that you guys are quite literally
building out, and then you you use it,
just call it something else?
I I mean, I seriously hope that we're
wrong about this because this is quite terrifying,
but it's amazing how it just keeps happening
in succession. So here's what he had to
say. Here's the actual clip.
Is why president Trump has drawn a new
strategic map
from Greenland to the Gulf Of America to
the Panama Canal and its surrounding countries.
At the Department of War, we call this
strategic map the Greater North America.
Why?
Because every sovereign nation and territory North Of
The Equator, from Greenland to Ecuador and from
Alaska to Guyana, is not part of the
global South.
It's
a
security perimeter in this great neighborhood that we
all live in.
Each one of these countries border either the
North Atlantic or the North Pacific.
Each one of these countries sits north of
the two basic geographic barriers that exist in
this region.
The Amazon.
And Andes Mountains.
This is basic
geography.
That we don't teach in schools as much
as we should. And it restores our North
South relations, and we must get it right.
In the North, The United States must enhance
posture and presence in cooperation with you and
our sovereign partners to defend our shared immediate
security perimeter. In the South, meaning South Of
The Equator,
the other side of this great neighborhood,
we will strengthen partnerships through increased burden sharing.
Yeah. I mean yeah. You mean all the
countries that you're currently I mean, look at
what they're doing to the South America in
general. Like, this is the monroe doctrine. You're
basically creating you're just forcing them into your
sphere of influence when they don't want that
because you because you claim it's your backyard.
It's just hubris. It's the same point, guys.
You just think about the idea that you
just
claim the control over this because you're powerful.
Yes. That's the whole point. Your power, even
though it's wildly over
framed, is not necessary. It doesn't give you
the right to just do whatever you want.
That's
the world that Miller and the rest tell
you it it should be. Right? We're strong
enough. We should take Denmark.
Openly making that argument. You may even agree.
Maybe even you think that's the natural state
of the world. You might be right. Doesn't
change the fact that they're up here yelling
different things, telling you that we believe in
law, constitution, liberty, free speech.
But how many times can we see them
contradict what they're saying before we all start
seeing it and calling it out? Frankly, I
think we're damn near there.
Here there's a whole bunch, by the way,
of other examples. I'll include the main ones
I think are most important.
At the the proposal from Donald Trump to
create a new WHO and spend $2,000,000,000 on
it, far more than we spend right now
with would in with the WHO,
which which is a global organization that is
a globalist point, and he wants to do
it himself, be in charge. Right? We also
have the,
board of peace that he creates
that he that he announced at Davos. Right?
They announced at the UN as and the
UN calls a
a tangential
security council.
That is globalist, guys. Just because Alex Jones
is too much of a coward, to be
honest about it, doesn't mean it's not. It's
obvious.
The even the logo is ex it's basically
the Technate version of the UN map.
Involves multiple countries. Trump makes himself basically emperor
king for life. It's not a joke. Even
when he's not president, he's apparently leader of
this group. How do we not see what's
happening?
Tap of that, just the general point about
what I think where this all goes. Fake
globalist resistance, acting like we're fighting globalism while
you literally announce a globalist plan at the
globalist meeting of Davos.
Pretty wild that that's not obvious to everybody.
Now, here's David Miller pointing out the Greater
Israel projects. Funny how we can't even use
different terminology. He says, yes. As we have
been saying, this goes well beyond Greater Israel.
They truly want it to be the final
war. It's masonic.
Right? Messianic. It's it's eliminationist.
It's a race to establish Pax judicia.
Now the we just talked about this in
the last show. This I mean, I'll point
out in a second as Lindsey Graham just
told you it was a religious war. Iran's
not saying that. Iran's not invading or bombing
or any number of those things.
Israel's saying that. The US is saying that.
The US and Israel are bombing. And, and
and we can't literally carrying out religious war,
like end times practices.
And there and and Iran is the religious
extremist. Look, you just have to be obvious
about what's happening or be be honest rather.
And,
Skykes, pick it 2026. Time to redraw the
Middle East map.
Funny how that's working out. So what you
could almost see here, guys, is that from
one side, you've got the US government,
whatever you really think is controlling this,
creating this side of the globalist map. We
control the Technate side. Then you've got Israel
saying, well, we're gonna redesign the Middle East
map over here.
And put together, even though they're on the
same team, well, what does that look like?
Well, we control the globe.
Funny how that's, you know, right in front
of you. And they've always had the greater
reset point, right, or greater is perfect. Exactly
the same thing in my mind, the great
Israel map
openly discussed, openly, you know, on their patches
on their arms of their soldiers, on the
podiums they're speaking from, and yet then you
get people like mainstream media who pretend like
it's not real.
Just give you the map in case you
haven't seen it.
There's plenty of them. This is, I think,
the then there's slight variations to them, you
know, but this is the most I think
the the most common that I've seen. And
it just shows you look look at where
that's at, guys. And look at how much
it aligns with every part of what we're
talking about.
I mean, what does Saudi Arabia think about
that? What does Egypt think about that? What
does I mean, any number of countries that
it clearly overlaps with that go well beyond
what it's currently doing? Turkey. Didn't they just
tell you Turkey's next?
They did.
Now here is Lindsey Graham.
Just telling you. It's a religious war.
As they write, in four days, Iran went
from a limited operation,
an imminent threat, to the Holy Crusade two
point o.
In the middle of the holy month of
Ramadan, 2,000,000,000 Muslims are told that The US
and Israel are waging a religious war against
them.
This is a religious war.
Who wins it at the end of the
day? Do the radical Islamic terrorist who wanna
kill all the Jews because god told them
to?
I mean, please show me where anyone other
than US
government is even saying that.
Not not the any MRI channel that's run
by Israel that points out the most radical
people they can use, many of them are
Mossad agents, quite literally, by the way.
Show me where we're seeing I I see
Israel doing these things. I see the US
government doing these things. I see a Zionist
extremist religious Zionist cabinet in is is The
United States. I see them genetically
engineering red caps to tell you the end
times are here. And you're telling me Iran?
I mean, come on, guys. I'm not gonna
argue in any sense that their government is
not problematic or not dangerous or not potentially
ends up in the same point.
But evidence has to matter here, guys. It
has to matter. And on top of everything,
they've lied to you about every single thing
we've ever dealt with in our lives right
now in quick succession.
I shouldn't even say it like that. Just
the point is, you know it's been in
tremendous amount.
When they when they told you, you know,
what the weather was that day, you probably
didn't lie. Maybe not. But at the end
of the day, they've lied to us so
spectacularly about everything we've dealt with in the
last, you know, the Israel government, and we're
gonna believe them now? Didn't Lindsey Graham just
get caught lying? I mean, it just it
doesn't change.
Call it out.
To the radical Islamic terrorist,
this is a religious war.
Who wins it at the end of the
day? To the radical Islamic terrorist who wanna
kill all the Jews because god told them
to? Who wanna kill me because I'm And
and what about the idea that Israel killed
all the Palestinians because god told them to?
Isn't that exactly what they're telling you, Amalek
and the whole thing?
An infidel. And look at this guy, man.
I'm just gonna be honest. This guy there's
some this this these are dangerous people to
the point to where you can see it
on their face.
I'm telling you, in my opinion, clearly, this
is subjective.
But for crying out loud, these people are
in not acting in American interests. The MAGA
movement now sees that.
Who wanna purify Islam,
to reject
moderation and make everybody
or jihadists? I mean, what is he even
talking about? This guy is such a clown.
This is Israel's line. That's what this is.
This is a big deal.
I'll deal with section two thirty.
So what we're facing right now is a
moment of decision that will set the course
of the future of the Mideast for a
thousand years.
Thousand years.
You know, that's these aren't accident points, guys.
He's literally telling you that Israel's great in
the end times, and we support that, which
by the way, necessitates the fall of the
West, and they all know that.
But America first,
same point.
Mark Ames points out the Washington Post saying
the strike to strike a thousand targets in
twenty four hours in Iran, which is just
mind blowing,
the US
military leveraged the most advanced AI it's ever
used in warfare,
Anthropic.
Claude partnered with the military, Maven Smart Systems,
suggesting using certain locations. Wasn't that funny
that they're still using?
Anthropic?
You mean, even though they deemed them a
supply chain risk? Oh, you so they don't
care about their own statements? They don't care
about what they claim is important? They just
do what they wanna do in the moment
no matter what? Yes, guys. Yes. Every single
time. They're hypocrites. They're embarrassing.
We're you we they're the worst thing in
the world because they won't do what we
want. We they won't let us use their
AI to kill children and use autonomous weapons,
which is pretty much their only demands. And
so they they said, you're a supply chain
risk, then went on to use it in
Iran, and still to this day. As far
as I can tell. In fact, it turns
out they used it to kill those children
at school.
This is why they push back.
So let's talk about that.
US Israel illegally bombed Iran, killing over a
100 school children February 28. It's only gotten
more clear since then. We showed you this
one where Hegseth accidentally or by stupidity or
because somebody else gave him the intelligence
literally gave you the the evidence to show
that they target that school targeted the school,
excuse me.
He post this map in this briefing. One
of the other people that were there took
the map and point the which is accurate,
the dot where the school is. And look,
it's even in the red of where they
bombed.
How do you deny this? Now, on top
of all of that, their own assessments are
now showing that they did do this or
most likely rather. Let's not forget that Elon
Levy comes out and says the US government
did it. Don't you dare pin this on
us.
Then I'll school and basically tries to give
the example, which has now become the talking
point after they all told you it was
in Afghanistan, of course,
that it seems like faulty intelligence. Well, gee,
Elon Levy, where's that intelligence come from?
Israel.
Supplying them with this evidence. That's the truth,
guys, and they'll tell you that. So funny
how it turns out that Israel set them
up to bomb a Sheldon school if or
maybe they all agreed to it. This is
their who knows? Or this is them throwing
him under the bus. Wouldn't surprise me.
That's what I said about this. Hey, Israel
supporters. One of Israel's assets just publicly admitted
the school was indeed bombed and then claimed
the US government was responsible for the bombing
alone and not to blame Israel. Greatest ally
indeed.
There's the school, by the way. Right there.
Remember all the narratives you heard because they
were repeating what somebody said online because they
just went with whatever they were told because
they needed to defend the team? Well, it's
not on the same compound. And that's what
I said in the beginning because I looked
and I care about facts.
It's not even close in the sense of,
like, what they were trying to make it
out to be. Like, adjacent it's adjacent in
a general sense, but this is a high
level this is a a high up map
that's quite far in the regard of a
bombing location. And and regardless,
no matter what they say, it did not
amount to a legal target. And they bombed
it anyway.
But, as I told you, and I'm glad
people are continuing to make this case, I
did it on my show as well, This
person goes, hey. Check it out. This, ladies
and gentlemen, is an elementary school at Fort
Bragg.
Funny how we apply this logic, if you
wanna call it that, to anybody else to
make sense of our crimes, or the government's
crimes, but then don't care. So if Iran
bombed this right now and killed all these
children, would that be illegal because it's in
Fort Bragg? No. It would not.
And this person was that's why they posted
this. The only intent was to hit the
military base. The Iranians were responsible for placing
school next to the military base and having
children in it.
They just these are just stupid people. They
don't understand them. That they're just being fed
whatever that makes sense for the narrative. And
they don't even know what they're talking about
because it's not true.
Here's a deeper example of this, guys. I
mean, it's so clear. I made this point
case about about Israel too. The DOD operates
as they write a 161
schools on military bases. It's not an uncommon
practice. Some directly adjacent to airfields.
But here we are. The old they they
you know, same thing. Because they had it
so close. Well, the narrative at first was
it was in the base because you guys
repeat what you hear. I shouldn't say I
don't know this person. But overall, the general
point is that that's what you got from
the partisans.
And here's even Randy Fine
telling you that Iran did it because this
guy is not an American I mean, the
truth is not that. The facts don't show
that. And as he says this, he knows
that, and still he lies for Israel. In
fact,
well, I'll let it play for itself.
Doing the right thing to make sure that
Iran never gets a nuclear weapon. Has he
conducted the war well so far, though? Absolutely.
I think Nearly a 175 civilians in an
Iranian girls school were killed. Yeah. Average age
between seven and 12. That's the right thing.
I I believe the evidence shows it was
Iran that did that. What's the evidence, sir?
Yeah. What's the evidence? What's the evidence they
didn't?
The answer was, what's the evidence they didn't?
You see how dishonest this is? This is
a guy who claims to represent the United
States government,
or rather, excuse me, claims to represent The
US the American people.
And it's it's just
all I mean, the point is obvious. He
will default to them without evidence because they
bad guy. This guy is working for somebody
else. I mean, it from go from every
possible thing he does. He is a a
fat man version of Laura Loomer.
That's the truth. I mean, with everything he
does, he's a vile person who constantly shows
you and pushes the envelope. Bombs away, he
says to pictures of dead children,
literally.
So, he says, evidence that Ron did it.
Here is somebody saying, except Ron has admitted
it was one of their bombs.
This person talking about the children that were
killed. Oh, has a great Graham, we'll see
how the how big it is. 654,000
followers.
Think about that. Iran has admitted it was
one of theirs.
Nope.
Didn't happen. Not even once.
On top of the fact that here's US
intelligence.
US investigation points to likely US responsibility in
the school bombing. This is from yesterday. Here's
the New York Times. Analysis suggest school was
hit amid US strikes on Iranian naval base.
You know, aside from the early immediate evidence
that very clearly showed that, aside from Hegseth
showing you the map where they bombed, aside
from Israel telling you they did it, well,
yeah, let's keep pretending like Iran claimed
this is what we deal with every single
day. You see how frustrating you see why
often people in our position feel like everyone's
a lot everyone's a bot and everyone's gonna
you know, because that's how this is but
we have to be we have to check
ourselves. I fall into it myself all the
time, getting into it online with people Because
I and frankly, a lot of times, I
know these I see the people who are
constantly propagandizing every and I see I know
that they're manipulators.
But the point is that I still shouldn't
get pulled into it. But or that I
shouldn't assume that everyone is somebody, you know,
and I
constantly try to check myself with that. My
point is, though, it does exist, and it
is out there. It's overwhelming.
It's I mean, how it's part of me
is wondering. It's like, do you should we
even be engaging in like, right now on
comments and the line and chat? Because it's
just so shockingly manipulated today. How do you
know what's real and what's not? It's hard
to make sense of it or even make
it valuable or useful anymore. But on top
of that, it's been geolocated as well. Account
I I recommend you follow. Girl this is
the geo geo confirm Iran schools, the girls
schools bombing, and it goes over with it's
all you could check every one of them
for yourself. And this I I actually appreciate
this count quite a bit because it did
the same thing in the last one, and
the evidence is pretty clear.
Here is
going back a step, here's Noah Burak. Remember
her? The regime in Iran has now confessed.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is where that
ridiculous 700,000
influencing account get their information. From a Zionist
manipulator that has nothing but screenshots. In fact,
by the way, of an account that is
not run by anything connected to Iran is
a very publicly known manipulated account for Israel's
agenda, but it doesn't matter though.
To all the legacy media and pro regime
influencers peddle the fake news.
Yeah. This was Twitter files. Here's a screenshot.
Don't we all believe you now? Thanks, Elon
Musk. Well, as the rest of it, as
Jasper Nathaniel points out, hey. You guys planning
on unretweeting this straight up disinformation about the
bombing of a school, or are you cool
with being known as peddlers of murderers' lives?
They're cool with that. That's their job.
They'll leave it up just to trick a
few more people, even though they look that
stupid.
Drop site news on top of that story.
By the way, guys, this is for March
5.
More schools. And, see, here we go. This
is the same cycle.
Lebanon,
Gaza, Syria, it's the same thing. They do
the same thing every single time, and The
US knows that and is okay with that.
The government.
More schools struck
and damaged in US Israeli strikes on Iran.
Two missiles hit two schools in the town
of,
Per
Perond,
Southwest of Tehran, according to state affiliated media.
Of course, you can call them liars. We
just saw them bomb one. We saw the
endless procession in Israel and Gaza, and now
we have evidence showing the same on the
ground.
The Israeli military said Thursday had begun a
large scale wave of strikes against infrastructure in
Tehran. Now we already saw the but they
publicly posted the imagery of bombing Tehran. They
said, look at what we're doing.
Guys, that's a place that has more has
more set packed than New York City.
Tons of civilians. And, yes, there's examples of
some people getting out of the way, but
there's provable evidence that it was packed with
people, and they bombed the entire area.
And now, we're gonna pretend like they're totally
not bombing other like, even if it was
accidental or indiscriminate, it's the same point. They're
bombing schools. They're bombing hospitals, just like they
do. And guys, it's a matter of practice
for them.
Then you get HEGSAT that goes up, we
don't bomb civilian targets. You mean the side
of every war you've ever been in? And
I mean deliberately, and you could prove it.
Yemen,
Iraq, Syria, guys, you could prove these things.
They've been called out by the UN, by
amnesty, by Human Rights Watch, with evidence on
the ground.
The campaign has drawn comparisons to Israel's the
Haya doctrine. Right? Mowing the lawn, they call
it. A strategy associated with the two thousand
six Lebanon War that calls for disproportionate
force. It's literally their policy.
And large scale destruction of infrastructure in areas
linked to hostile groups to pressure civilians to
create deterrence.
We all know this. Everyone knows that who
have who's ever paid attention. The government knows
it.
The next day,
US Israeli missiles have hit an elementary school
in Tehran, the fourth school in six days.
Foreign ministry spokesman shared the video that shows
the elementary school before and after the strike.
A casualty toll was not immediately available.
Here,
Barry Malone,
they're just killing children all over again. CNN,
a newborn ward at this hospital in Iran
was damaged following a US Israeli strike
on Tuesday.
It's just the same thing over and over,
guys. Same as Gaza. Are are we pretending
these are all fake? Is this some kind
of a show? Is this Hollywood, guys? Are
we talking about the fact that these are
all little small terrorists in their baby cribs?
What are we actually saying? Guess what? They're
not really saying anything.
They're just ignoring it until it becomes something
they have to lie about, it seems.
Hengseth brags of death and destruction as US
Israeli air strikes massacre civilians in Iran. According
to US based civil rights groups,
Iranian medical officials, more than a thousand civilians
have been killed in just four days.
As David Smith or Dave DeCamp says,
the fact that Hagseth tries to put a
veneer of Christianity on this makes it all
the more damnable.
If you're a Christian,
how in the world could you ever pretend
this makes sense?
Or I mean, if you're a Jewish person,
if you're a Muslim, how could you ever
pretend this makes sense?
Same point. Despite how everyone loves to frame
these things, at the end of the day,
it's ultimately the same point with with different
perspectives. If you wanna ever claim that one
is worth the idea is that any one
of them have people that I mean, any
one of them can lead to radicalization should
you go that route. The KKKs pretends that
they're Christian, guys. It's just stupid that we
don't acknowledge that.
Now here's a point I want to include
for to to counterbalance.
I saw this going around.
It says the moment when US bombs struck
a school in Iran. Now, there's two reasons
I wanna share this, or more than that,
actually. To show you, to demonstrate for you
that I don't just blindly share whatever I
come across, and I hope you know that
by now. But I'll that we look into
these things, that we check them. But I
often show this where I saw it first.
Doesn't mean that I saw a tweet and
I just looked and shared it. Okay? We
make sure we bet these. And I make
mistakes like anybody.
But the point is that that with this
one, turns out to be
at least appears to possibly be false. I'll
show you why. And I find this fascinating.
The real point is whether or not this
is real, we know they bomb schools, and
that's proven.
The point about this is the interesting discrepancy
between Grok. And I think what's worth pointing
out that these this yeah. Like, I've I
like, I use it on this show, which
plenty don't probably disagree with. It's an it's
a or there's no use for what I
see in counter balancing a partisan opinion,
but not using it as the source sort
the sole source. And I that should never,
ever, ever, for the rest of existence, be
the way that works because I've I've caught
it being wrong, I mean, half the time,
honestly.
So this person posts this saying it's a
war crime. So a lot of people share
it because they are like, yes, we agree
Israel is bad without checking the facts, and
we should. This person just asked, is this
from recent? And it says no.
The video is old CCTV
CCTV footage from May 1.
And it goes on. And they ask again.
And we'll say, wait a minute. It says
2026 in the video.
And they say, no. The screen is wrong.
It's 2024.
Overlay, visible, across frames, and it goes on
for and she asked again, wait a minute.
It says it right there. And they say,
no. That's not. It's 2024. It's weird, though.
It gets a little bit weird where it
says, the original video frames consistently display twenty
twenty four. But that's not true.
They don't. Now, what they're not what they're
not saying is that they're not saying they
have the other version. It's very weird. You
can read it through for yourself. I I
wanna get through it quick. But it basically
goes on to say things that are actually
not true.
The magnified image you shared swa shows the
2026 science time stamp, but frames the original
video
that cons consistently reads this. And she keeps
going back, but look, I took a screenshot.
It's not true.
And this one
says
oh, that's the original for the this one
says, yes. So this one says, is it
real? And it says, yes.
Same point I'm gonna get to. But you
could argue it just means reopen out the
same date. So I'm like, okay. Interesting. Curious
to see what it says. And I've done
this before with these. If I ask it
separately and not on a chat. And look
what it says.
I said, when is this video from? And
it says, from 2026.
Right there. And I'm I'm like, this is
so ridiculous.
And I said, and it says no evidence
suggests it was older or reused. It's almost
certainly
02/11/2026.
And so I followed up and it says,
well, that's all. I said the the,
you hear you claim that it's old which
is it. The video in question which has
been circulating connection with the recent strikes is
recycled footage.
For twenty fourteen twenty four. You see my
point guys and so this is just you
can never rely on these things. The scenes
from Iranian event, it says, likely a drill
or minor incident in an Asian school setting.
What do you mean a likely drill? Like,
if you watch the video,
it's obvious it's not a drill. There's explosions.
So at this point, it's like so I'm
like, okay, is somebody manipulating Grock? Well, we
know that's happening. We know that's happening. No
credible source tie it to 2026.
So I said, so explain why you said
it was in the opposite start and so
on. Right? And it says, the initial state
assessment I gave was incorrect. I apologize for
the inconsistency. It stemmed from an incomplete initial
analysis.
Okay. Well, that alone should mean we shouldn't
ever blindly trust it, which we know. The
video's provenance
when I first examined the post. In my
first response, I relied on the visible timestamp.
So what it's saying is we just relied
on just
that that's if the whole point is we're
supposed to be checking whether these things can
be manipulated, and that's what they asked to
begin, is it real? You just rely on
what you see face value? That seems like
a weird thing to do. But it says
the clip is recycled footage.
I just thought that was fascinating. You know,
we recognize that we can't engage with these
things without a grain of salt. And that's
very important. On especially because we know that
whatever Elon or whatever the other groups are,
of course, they're manipulating these things. Of course,
they're trying to it maybe they don't even
think they're doing something wrong. Maybe they think
that's the right way and that's the wrong
answer. Right? But that's subjective.
That's how this goes. And we need to
be wary of that as this continues to
grow into our lives.
Now,
into the part of Miller and the rest
kind of changing the way we view these
things, we're trying to create the impression that
somehow murdering innocent people because Iran bad, somehow,
it means you're strong or that we're not
woke anymore.
I'm telling you guys, this man is your
worst enemy. If you're a Republican, this man
hates you. This man wants to see you
guys look like the people that everyone claims
you are, and I know you're not, in
a sense of the majority of conservatives or
the majority of this country for that matter.
This guy wants to create the impression the
rest of the world wants to believe about
everyone here because of our government.
As well, I'll play the clip, and I'll
read what Jake says after that.
President has made clear
that he believes America's awesome military might should
be used to protect and defend
America's
interests,
not to surrender
means to bomb Iran for Israel though, which
he believes that's the same thing. To the
world, to our adversaries,
to our enemies, to those who would do
us harm, not to surrender the world's resources,
lanes of commerce. What he means is not
to allow other people to engage with things
that we want, need, and use. Right? So
China can't have access to anything in Africa.
China can't make deals with people we want
things from. We have to that's an insane
worldview.
That's a supremacist worldview, an authoritarian
worldview. That's what he's saying. This is the
point of anybody making if somebody makes an
agreement with China or Russia that we don't
like with, we'll force them to stop that.
That's just insane.
Or capacity
to keep our citizens safe. No. America first
means America will be the greatest, most unquestioned,
unmatched power in the world. That is not
even remotely what America first means, guys. This
is insane. So what he's trying to say
is we're gonna use our power and military
to do all these things in the world,
and that's somehow now America first?
No. That means America first. That means that
money and effort and everything should go into
Americans' lives, not the money and military force
that we use to invade Iran for Israel
or Syria or Afghanistan or Libya or Bosnia,
every single thing we could talk about.
How in the world are you gonna say
a strong military is America first other than
if that military was simply at home protecting
America?
This guy doesn't care about you.
And that means we will defend American lives.
And, yes, we will avenge Other than all
the Americans that are apparently dying right now
because of Israel's war. And apparently, it's hundreds
despite what they're telling you. American blood.
Iran has waged we will avenge American blood.
Iran has waged war against the American people,
this regime, for forty seven years. Same old
lazy talking point. Oh, yeah. Where's that, Miller?
Where's that? Demonstrate the bombings in that war
campaign. Demonstrate the invasions or the troops or
any other things that you always tell us.
I mean, didn't you guys just get done
telling us that this isn't war because it's
not actually war? Because war is boots on
the ground. Oh, blah blah blah blah. But
then over here, they've been at war with
us forty seven years and it's you can't
see it though. It's all because of their
secret funding of groups that we point to
that we avoid that we otherwise fund at
the other time. It just becomes embarrassing.
You know what I mean? That's all it's
the same point every time. Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas.
That's what they're talking about. Aside from the
fact that Israel funded Hamas, aside from the
fact that the Houthis have demonstrated to the
world that they're not anything remotely they're claiming
as they have stopped the shipping to Israel
and have stopped ships with bombings and everything
else that have killed no one, they've stolen
nothing, and they've let them all go. What
terrorists?
Or Hezbollah, for example, who is a popular
group in Lebanon that's fighting against the manipulated
government there and is not in any way
doing anything outside of it's just lazy, guys.
This guy doesn't care. And has waged war
against the American people, this regime, for forty
seven years.
They took
our embassy
hostage. Oh, see. Oh, now going back to
an old discussion. Now why would that happen,
actually? I don't know. Maybe because your invasive
actions and what you were doing to the
world. He's talking about the embassy. I mean,
look, guys. You have to understand what we
the operation Ajax and how they manipulated the
country and how they have constantly been destabilizing
them and killing their people and assassinating their
leaders. And the point is they have a
reason to push back.
Now, did everything that happened there, was that
what I support? No. In most cases, what
you see is violence in response to violence.
And you know I don't agree with that.
It doesn't change the fact that these people
feel they're justified because of their illegal actions.
For example, with Hamas. Right? There's tons of
things I could point out, including examples where
they were they did violate the law when
that happened. It doesn't change the fact that
because they were in a legally occupied territory,
per the Geneva Conventions, they had the legal
right to our rebellion.
These are all facts. So in this case,
what we're talking about is what you've been
doing to them their entire lives, and somehow
they're at war with you forever despite how
many times you've bombed them, how many times
you invaded, how many times you've destabilized, how
many times you've overthrown their government and killed
their scientists. Yeah. Clearly, we can see that,
Stephen Miller.
They bombed our marines in Beirut.
They kidnapped,
tortured, and murdered
the CIA station chief. They Right. Wait. Wait.
So you mean a spy who was spying
on you know, I mean, I'm not gonna
rationalize any of it. In fact, like I
said before, every one of these individual points
are mired in BS coming from the US
government. And there's tons more to go. I'm
not gonna litigate every one of them. We
talked about most of these in the past.
But it's just like talking about Venezuela and
what they were doing in that conversation, acting
like everything was justified when it's very clear
that they're the ones creating the problem, starving
people,
pretending to bomb food trucks and blaming another
people, it turns out full of barbarian wood.
That's the government we're talking about. The government
that overthrew governments in the past
for fruit companies or control over interests.
That's the same point.
So what he's pointing to in these past
examples, whether you agree with the way they
responded or not, is response to their
incredibly
never ending obvious illegal actions in the world.
They have maimed and wounded and attacked thousands
of American troops. Same point. It's always thousands
because they're only ever talking about that one
engagement, and that's it.
Now step back again and look at all
the times they've did what they've done. They've
literally overthrown their country and taken control.
All of that American blood spilled by this
regime,
and president Trump for years has said Apparently,
that's ninety five percent of every person in
this country that has a maimed arm, leg,
or face.
Ninety five percent. Let's laugh let's laugh about
that again real quick.
We will not allow a regime that sheds
the blood of our citizens,
that menaces our people, that spreads terrorism around
the world, that trains proxy armies. We will
not allow that regime to have missiles that
can reach our troops. Okay. So here we
are again. Right? Where okay. Beside from what
we said. Even if you agree with everything,
that doesn't change the legal reality that they
have a right to have missiles or drones
or any of it.
Is there somebody wanna walk me through the
legal mechanism where they can say you're not
allowed to have arms?
I don't care whether you think they're terrorists
or not. Like, if you argue that you
shouldn't have to care about the law, then
make your case. You see, that's what I'm
always pointing out. They're not arguing the law
doesn't matter. They're arguing this is legal. It
is not.
If you wanna argue that we shouldn't have
to care about the law, which is kind
of what they're doing here, then make that
argument, Miller. But they want you to believe
what they're doing is right while they eat
their cake and have it too
or have their cake and have it too.
Excuse me. That that's what they're doing because
what they're doing everywhere is illegal. They can
reach our basis that someday in the future
could reach the American Mainland. Exactly like they
can do it now to them and have,
in fact.
But it's only wrong when they do it
or don't do it, but have the ability
to do it and never actually do it.
Terrorists.
And certainly will not allow that regime to
have nuclear weapons. But They never have and
never would based on the information we have.
I've always argued they could have a secret
grouping somewhere that we don't know about. Of
course, it's possible. The evidence doesn't back it
up. The US government, every single administration, including
Trump's right now, have told you they don't
have them and aren't seeking them. The IAEA
said right now, or at least back in
June 2025 up until this point,
are under their safeguards right now, which by
the way was four hundred and sixty something
kilograms about six some of it being 60%
that Witcoff tried to tell you was them
bragging, which was literally allowed within their safeguards
according to the group that makes those assessments.
So Witcoff lied to them on purpose, the
world, to make it sound like what was
normal and them stating their static reality that
was within the law was them bragging about
breaking the law because that's how grossly dishonest
this is. And the diplomats around him have
all told that everyone that Witkoff was the
one lying about what's going on.
What you're seeing right now, Sean, is a
military under president Trump's leadership that's not fighting
politically correct. What does that mean?
All he's trying to do is tap in
with the the Republicans who think they're fighting
woke something. And so, oh, go. Yeah. Democrats
bad. That's the lowest common denominator.
I I mean, I think it's quite clear
that's not the majority.
Maybe they thought it was. Maybe they underestimated
their own people. It's not, though. It's not
the majority, in my opinion, based on what
I can see. He wants you to believe
they're not from a woke war. But I
guess that translates to what we can see.
Right? Because what else would it be? And
that means killing a school full of children.
Right? That means bombing an entire location, civilian,
you know, town like a New York level
area. What they're doing. Well, I mean, what
else what are we talking about? What would
be the non woke version of that? I
guess not murdering civilians?
I mean, what do you wanna argue that
they're doing it in some kind of a
like, we're we're addressing woke pro woke pronouns
while we don't kill civilians? What are you
talking about?
It's just a lazy, desperate effort to convince
people who might be on the fence that
what they're doing is actually fighting woke stuff.
I don't know why you thought that would
work with everybody, Miller, because we're not that
stupid.
That isn't fighting with its hands tied behind
its back. One of the reasons I fear,
Sean, that some people in this country lost
faith in the military and the capacity to
use that military to defend us is because
we had a woke Pentagon,
because we had a military who at the
very highest level Yeah. Right. So we we
just we weren't killing enough.
Right? We weren't just being strong and powerful.
This is this game they play with it's
kinda like the Jones types. You know? I
eat meat and I drink and I'm a
man. Like, you're embarrassing.
I can do those things too. I don't
have to pretend like I'm one-sided to make
it seem like I'm not weak. People that
do that are weaker than you think.
Most people who are competent, strong, and and
and, you know, not embarrassed about themselves, they
just are who they are. They own who
they are,
whatever that ends up being. You know, you
don't need to take medications and dump things
in to make yourself feel like you're full
of testosterone. It's just it's bad, guys, and
it's not what we should strive for.
And this man is just trying to drive
you down that road. Be you know, just
if you take what you want because we're
powerful and we could do it, and all
they're doing is creating a situation where they
can do that to you.
That's what it comes down to.
It's not the war fighters was forced to
fight a less than full fight. What you're
seeing that mean?
Bound by law. That's what that means. There's
no other way you can interpret that. Because
what I mean, somebody wanna give an example
of what it means to fight a woke
war or what what you're bound by? Please
explain that for me. The only thing that's
different is indiscriminately killing civilians.
I guess that's where we are now. Now,
Sean, is a military that is unleashed in
all of its lethal prowess to go out
and seek, destroy, and kill the enemy, which
is what militaries are for. Yeah. And, apparently,
that means all the civilians in the area,
which they're cheering on.
And as
Jake points out, the point of calling a
bombing campaign not politically correct
is to make empathy itself illegitimate. It's a
very good way to say that.
Once mourning dead children is reframed as softness,
weakness,
there is no floor. That's what's happening online
right now. Anything but can be justified as
long as objecting to it can be painted
as weakness. Now, understand, like I was saying
earlier, they're not fully there yet. Most of
them are trying to still pretend like it
just didn't happen or that if it did,
it was kind of justified because they put
it too close. You see my point? They're
not getting if it was just a school
bomb with nothing else around it, most people
that that would probably still be too hard
for most of them. But he's trying to
push that needle. He's trying to get it
to the point to where, well, they're the
enemy. Right? As we get into the discussion
about the ship and the naval exercise, it's
the same kind of overlap.
Whereas, you know, if you're the enemy, Ryan,
it's like, well, did we declare war? But
and, really, as an American to an American,
are they, though?
We need to actually be thinking about the
reality of how many times we've been lied
in war by our government, by Israel.
But the reality of it is what we're
doing is legal, and that has to be
the first point, whether they deserve it or
not. Whatever that means, they deserve it.
Like, again, we're so juvenile, or rather they
are driving us to be so juvenile today.
Scott Horton says, see, the empire just has
not been quite violent enough.
Think about what he's saying. I love this.
The US government that has waged war in
every country ever it seemed, it was just
millions and millions of people killed throughout the
war on terror.
But, yeah, but we haven't been violent enough.
Now, they're actually killing people.
Forget what you thought that you remembered about
Chex notes your entire lifetime.
Now, they're being violent. I mean, think about
framing that after Afghanistan and Iraq and Syria
and Libya and on and on and on.
And I really mean that. Like, you can
go on to all the countries they're not,
like, literally occupying, that they've been Sudan, Somalia.
I mean, it just gets it's crazy.
And that's and now now we're gonna get
really serious.
Wow. And as the person points out, don't
forget what he was saying before. He's just
like all the rest. And he's probably the
one guiding most of this manipulation.
Trump wants no war back in 2024.
No war in The Middle East. I cannot
say this clearly enough. War is the ultimate
tragedy. Tragedy. Excuse me. Trump wants harmony and
cooperation in the world, not the death and
destruction. Okay. Fine. Unless you I know the
argument they're already wanting to say. But Iran
had to be taken out for that peace.
Okay. Fine. You wanna believe that? Show me
why.
Like, if you're telling you right then you
wanted peace, 2024. Okay. What happened between then
and now that justified the action?
They haven't done anything but respond to that
aggression. See, the point is he said this
now because you wanted to pretend that's what
they wanted to make the rest of them
look bad who were involved in the genocide,
even though they went right to it and
started committing genocide too.
But see, then they continue to go after
Iran because that was always the plan. They
never want a peace in the first place.
But if you wanted to believe that's what
he meant, then demonstrate for me what they
did to shift that mindset that necessitated the
war. Or you can argue they always had
the mindset to take out Iran,
then you have to acknowledge the statement was
utterly false.
Or you could have said we want peace,
but Iran has to go down first. It's
not what he said. And you go, Liz
Cheney, the war hawk, and they want war.
Trump wants peace.
Just lazy, guys.
Here's Hegseth doing the same thing because clearly,
Miller gave him his talking points.
40 forces.
And we have no shortage of authorities.
The Abraham Oh, we know we had Trump
gave the maximum authorities to do whatever they
want on the ground without direction because because
that's always what guides a good military. It's
just do whatever you want. We back you.
You have clear objectives
with maximum authorities on the battlefield.
The dumb politically correct wars of the past
were the opposite of what we're doing here.
Again, I really do want an example of
that. What does a politically correct war look
like?
I even even people that agree with me.
Like, what what do you think they what
does that mean?
Because if if we can't if there can't
even if we can't even make up an
example for what that might look like,
what are we doing? A politically correct war?
Like, unless you're what you're saying is what?
That they allowed transgender in the military? That's
not the same that's wait. That's not the
war that's within the military. And I would
agree with the point we've gone to earlier
about what the transgender conversation should be about.
But what we're talking about here is that
you're claiming a war is woke,
and what we saw before through Biden or
Trump or anyone was just the continued killing
occupation.
Nothing changed. All of you did the same
thing.
They had vague objectives
with restrictive
minimalist
rules of engagement. No Yeah. So meaning the
law bound them. And even then, it didn't,
by the way, because we could prove they
were breaking the law too.
So the Obama Biden styles that were murdering
and bombing and breaking the law while claiming
to follow the law, that's the weak stuff.
We're gonna go out and do all that
even worse and then just tell you we're
doing it. Makes sense.
More.
Our authorities,
his authorities, centcom'scom
authorities through the president and myself are maxed
out. It's a fourth time of attack. Are
overwhelming and gathering
still
as are those of our Israeli partners.
Our munitions
are full up.
That's not true. That's embarrassing. Because at this
moment, we're they're discussing. That's not me that
they're just lying. I mean, that that's that
is the lie on the face because they
don't want that to be discussed within our
like, the individual. They know the media's calling
them out. They know all this went down.
They're just lying. That's why they're having meetings
with all the defense command contractors to increase
supply. Why would they do that if they
were all stocked up? It's just dumb. There
that's a bad lie. You didn't even need
to lie about that.
And our will is ironclad,
which means our timeline
is ours and ours alone to control.
I don't even know what that means. We'll
take as long as we want, I guess.
As long As long as Israel says you
can. As it takes to ensure The United
States Of America achieves these objectives. And as
we Illegal objectives that haven't been legally allowed
yet or no declaration of war, but we're
gonna do it anyway. Flow more forces. And
as we flow more capabilities, and as our
munitions Oh, wait. But this is gonna be
a short, quick in and out limited strike.
Right? Short war. But as we continue to
increase what we're doing
As as we're flying over the top, have
even more devastating effects. We set the tempo.
We set the timeline led by the Hasn't
that always been the case when the government's
in control of war that you guys dictate
what happens? I don't even know what you're
saying anymore.
You're in control. Are are you trying to
suggest that in the past Israel was or
somebody else was? I'm not even sure what
he's implying there. Commander
on the ground. Our ear is to the
ground to listen to admiral Cooper, what he
needs, and what he needs, he will get.
We are built for this fight,
and we are in it to win it.
I mean, get just like meaningless slogans.
Literally all flash and no substance. That's what
these people are. This one's even weirder, by
the way, as somebody jokingly called it like
a spoken word rap. It's very, very weird.
This was Brian Grim said, here's Hagsett describing
the changes he made to the rules of
engagement, which, by the way, led to the
mass murder of nearly an entire school full
of girls who had no idea their country
was even at war.
That's exactly the reality.
This
is
exhibit a.
To app to application to or exhibit a
to the app, application to the ICC to
issue an arrest warrant.
Here's what he says.
We're going to the, excuse me.
We're going to go on offense, not just
defense,
which, by the way, it's like these things
it's like they're trying to suggest and somehow
that the rest of them were told, like
sitting on their hands and going, we're doing
that's what are you talking about? They've they've
left, right, or entire life, they've invaded countries.
It's just this weird I'm almost wondering where
he doesn't even understand history.
Maximum lethality, he says, not tepid
legality.
That's what he said.
Violent effect, not politically correct. We're going to
raise up warriors, not just defenders.
Fight to win,
not not to lose. We're gonna go on
offense, not just on defense. Maximum
lethality,
not tepid legality,
violent effect,
not politically correct.
We're gonna raise up warriors,
not just defenders. So this war department,
mister president, just like America, is back.
It's just so embarrassing. I'm just I have
to laugh sometimes. Just
but yeah, right? So weirdly, like a little
rap poem, I guess. I don't know what
the hell that's about. But at the end
of the day, you just did. I mean,
that's why I agree with this person.
Other than the ICC, I should probably not
gonna do anything about it. But maximum lethality?
Why was that something that you praise? That's
never been the reality of any legal warfare.
And even against your enemies or the idea
of not tepid legality,
there's legal and there's not, guys. That's just
an opening for we'll bend it how we
want. That's what they do. I don't even
know why they'd be honest about that.
Here we are.
Now,
Ryan Grim reported on this ship on the
fifth. And I think this is a very
important conversation because of the way it got
covered and just showing you what our government
is capable of. I mean, it's exactly why
I I just used that part of of
what they're telling you. It's stuff like this.
It's it's,
you know,
surreptitious.
It's shady. It's, you know, bad form. It's
just, like, it's just it's something it is
punching them while they're down. That's exactly what
he said he was gonna do. That's not
a positive thing, guys. That's that is the
lack of, of integrity, respect, of principle.
Like and look, you could argue, well, they're
bad guys. Okay.
Why would we change who we are because
they're bad guys? Don't fall for that Stephen
Miller trap, guys. Don't pull yourself into what
they are. That's the bad guy. Why would
you act like that?
I mean, really, the idea has always been
even for the bad guys where whatever you
wanna you know, that we a terrorist that
you arrest them, you charge them with crime,
you present your evidence, they go to The
Hague, but nope. Right? Osama Bin Laden. Yo.
You just killed the thermometer
thrown out the helicopter.
The reality, guys, is they've been slowly changing
it for a long time. That was that
was not that was technically an Internet crime
in the first place, whether or not you
thought he was a terrorist. How do we
know
at the end of the day outside of
what they told us, and they've lied our
entire lives? And you could really go into
the reality of that and go back to
the beginning and the CIA, the connections to
him. But most people just are, you know
it's work check out James Corbett's work. We've
been lied to our entire lives. The point
comes back to the reality, guys, that this
is,
there is a standard that's supposed to be
met that they've always claimed they're upholding. I
mean, right now, they're they're telling you Iran's
breaking international law while they stand here and
care act like it doesn't matter for them.
So the way this went down is important.
One of the the the disputes is whether
it was armed, and I'll get into that.
I frankly find that to be the least
important part of this. To me, it's about
the the decorum. It's about the reality of
how this went down. On top of the
fact that they didn't declare war.
Period. And neither was Iran, apparently. And on
top of that, since that's that's the reality,
they claim that they're engaged because of the
War Powers Act. Well, they've proven that's not
the reality. Trump himself said we attacked first.
So it's not an imminent threat by every
definition of the word. The only way you
can meet the requirements for the War Powers
Act is to have an imminent threat. Otherwise,
you need congressional approval or an authorization use
for you an authorization of use for military
force,
like Iraq.
They don't have those things. So, that then
makes everything that follows illegal. Everything.
Because you understand, like, let's say that, okay,
we're engaged now. So, right now, they should
be going to Congress saying, let's get a
declaration to work. They probably get it, honestly,
because they just voted down the restrictions to
what he's doing. But they still don't. Because
then it becomes a real like, that becomes
an on the record legal reality. And I
think they know that they're already in dangerous
waters. They don't no pun intended.
So, Rheingrim,
an armed unarmed excuse me, and we'll get
to that in a second because it's disputed,
Iranian ship was invited
along with the US government to be a
part of an Indian naval exercise.
And its sailors paraded on land before the
present. There's lots of videos out there of
them talking and, you know, and you wanna
watch them, you can. They're just showing you
they're normal people just like you with families
and lives, talking about what they eat and
enjoying it was, an Indian and a, an
Iranian military a naval person talking about, you
know, interviewing each other and it's bunch of
them out there. Apparently, it happens pretty almost
every time. So the point is The US
was a part of it. Now there's this,
incorrect reporting on that too. It seems that
they were part of it, and they were
supposed to be there with a ship, and
they ultimately pulled that out of the way
and showed up with a submarine.
Or arguably, that both and only one of
them showed up. Either way, the ship didn't.
But the point is they committed to being
a part of this and still came to
it. Okay? So it says to be a
part of the exercise, and its sailors paraded
on land before The US at the last
minute
pulled out of the exercise. And now this
is the point is that they were there
with the the,
rather the point of the submarine. Now that
this is my point. There's disputed or, like,
different reporting.
Because right now, there seems to be, like,
apparently, last I checked, the Indian government hasn't
even spoken about this for, really.
And so you're getting somebody from within the
the
their side of it speaking about it, which
we'll get to. And then the point is
you have other reportings trying to grapple with
the limited information, and so we've gotten a
couple different points. Like, one of them, some
of them say they just never came and
showed up and did it. Right? The the
evidence that I can see seems to be
that they were committed with a ship, and
then either they showed up with this, which
is what I think seems to be the
most sense what I'm hearing for reporting, but
it's still there no Zamora really talking about
this yet,
or that they as he said, they pulled
the ship and then didn't show, but then
snuck in with the,
submarine and shot the ship down. Now as
we go through this, you'll see why it's
more relevant about the way that they did
this.
Breaking with all norms of civilized civilization and
warfare. And, again, remembering that they're not technically
declaring war. And this is even outside the
field they're acting in right now. This is
just a wild stretch,
everything considered. And it says, we then refuse
to rescue the drowning survivors,
which if you don't think that makes sense,
that's law, by the way.
Arguments go, and I guess, you know, same
thing disputed based on certain points, but that
even the Nazis
would would, you know, rescue people from the
water because that's the law. But there's examples
where I think all I think the case
goes that this actually started because of the
Nazi element after, like, in the Nuremberg trials.
But either way, the bottom line is that
that is the law. So these people are
supposed to and any whether adversaries or not,
that after an engagement, if there's no risk,
that's important too, that you're supposed to rescue
people that are
drowning.
They just left. The Sri Lankan navy was
left to pull the dead bodies from the
water because it was off the Sri Lankan
coast. He says, I'm hard pressed to think
of any other nation throughout history that would
do something so cowardly and despicable.
Now that's just an obvious point regardless of
whether you think it's legal or justified or
whatever.
It's just
just such a shocking lack of, like, respect
and decorum because you're there. You're invited there.
You're part of this exercise, and it's meant
to be under a guise of diplomacy. That's
another part of this, by the way. That,
technically, this is under a guise of diplomacy,
but it's after the ship kind of took
away from the exercise that they took it
out.
But it was very, you know, not very
far. We are genuinely in a league of
our own, he says, with the American media,
mostly shrugged off the bombing of a girl's
school and acted as if carpet bombing Tehran
is a normal military tactic. So here,
Conwall Sibal,
citing this person who says, our our our
watch
gets over when the ship oh, this is
just discussing this happened. They bombed them, and
they said our watch gets over when the
ship leaves the waters, saying that ultimately when
they left the territorial waters, it wasn't their
responsibility. But here's the point that the this
is a, former Indian foreign secretary.
He says the Iranian ship will not will
would not be where it was if we
had not invited it to our exercise. Right?
We were the hosts. I am told that
as per protocol,
this is disputed as well, or that was
the same point disputed, this exercise ships cannot
carry any ammunition.
It was defenseless.
Now,
some people are arguing that was the way
this was set up. And I've even gotten
reports that say that. But now you're getting
people on on all sides. Modi seems to
have been quiet still because he's the one
that could settle this, have claimed that, no,
that's not the case. But I'll get to
that more in a second. I don't think
it's as relevant to the rest of it.
But it would make it far more damning,
right, because they basically use this to take
them out when they weren't defenseless.
The Iranian naval personnel had paraded before our
president.
The attack by The US submarine was premeditated
as The US was aware of the Iranian's
pre ship's presence in the exercise to which
the US Navy was invited but withdrew from
per participation at the last minute, presumably with
this operation in mind. Now, again, there's you'll
see if you go into the larger reporting,
there's people that argued nuances to many points
in this. The US has ignored India's sensitivities
as the ship was in these waters because
of the India's in of India's invitation.
Now, there's more points to premeditation as well,
by the way. And we'll get to that
in a second. We are far from politically
or militarily responsible for The US attack.
Our responsibility is at a moral and human
plane.
A word of condolence by the Indian Navy
after political clearance at the loss of lives
of those who were our invitees has saluted
our president would be in order. And apparently,
no one's really and again, maybe it's happened
up, you know, since I've been live, but
unless I checked, I didn't see that.
So he he responded after that because they
added a community note.
It says the community note attached to this
now makes it even worse.
Apparently, because the note's gone, by the way,
now. Apparently, we participated in the joint exercise
with Iran. Right? So this is this is
my point. This is what Elon added to
it and then waited to kill them after
it was all it was all over. I
did not think this could be worse, but
it was wrong. I was wrong. Now that
could be false. He said, like, this is
how broken this is what Twitter does to
the world. But at the end of the
day, what we can see, we can see.
What we can prove, we can prove so
far. Those are the facts on the table.
So that does I'm not getting just aside
from the disputed parts of this, they were
they were originally involved. That's not disputed. Right?
Some points like this. And they ultimately did
shoot the the ship and and sink it.
That is true.
So, what he's saying is whoever added the
community note
comes in and says, well, we were involved
and we did participate, but it because they
were an enemy ship, we sunk them and
it was over essentially, then it got removed.
Now, I tried to find an image of
that and I couldn't find it. It was
there. I saw it.
But weird, right? Now, it's gone all of
a sudden because I think that it made
it worse. I think that's the point. I
think they ultimately accidentally admitted to something that
made it even more clear, and so it
got removed because, you know, most transparent in
history or whatever.
Brian Grim adds to it, Indian media reporting
that The US may have used its cooperative
access to secure Indian communications
to locate the Iranian ship, which was indeed
observing peace protocols, which means it was effectively
defenseless.
This is Indian media reporting on it. And
so it turns out, additionally,
if this is accurate,
that they were working with India, which would
make sense to me, to get
insightful information about the ship to be able
to track it after this.
And knowing that it was operating within a
peace protocol, meaning that it wasn't even of
the mind that it would be attacked, and
they attacked it.
So even if it was armed,
it's you know, that's a that's a a
disgusting
abuse of diplomacy, which, by the way, they
murdered
the Lebanese peace discussions while they were in
their meeting discussing it because they made them
go there. They bombed just the Iranian peace
discussion under a guise of diplomacy because they
claimed they were negotiating.
They killed Soleimani under a guise of diplomacy,
And they had him fly to Iraq. Why?
Because the 2002 authorization for use of military
force demanded it be Iraq.
That's the only way he felt like that
would legally line up is because, well, it
said destabilizing Iraq. So, they had him fly
to Iraq and they bombed him in the
airport.
He think about how insane this is. And
so why would we think for one second
they wouldn't use diplomacy here to go after
a ship to get a small win?
Think about why you would call it a
win when you manipulate them into being unaware
you're there and then sink them.
That's not somehow prowess. That's you guys manipulating
them into getting a win that makes it
look like you're strong.
I mean, it's just weird, isn't it? But
so can let's go into the article.
Here is oh, I mean, the mill there's
a this military.com
article was the best one.
Now this is the foreign minister,
the current foreign minister. He says The US
has per perpetrated an atrocity at sea.
This is Iran. Excuse me. Just in case
I didn't say that. 2,000 miles away from
Iran's shores.
Frigate Dina,
a guest of India's navy carrying almost a
130 sailors was struck in international waters without
warning.
Mark my words. The US will come to
bitterly regret precedent in a set.
Now what's interesting is this guy used to
have a check. Right? Well,
he said well, he says Elon, but looks
like somebody at Twitter suddenly removed his verification
check,
which will only result in the generating more
confusion and misinformation because they won't know whether
it's really him or not. It's what this
on purpose.
And more interesting about that
oh, then I get rid of that.
Well, there there is,
answers underneath that was suggesting there was pressure
coming from, you know, basically something trying to
drive this to be removed. Overall,
I think it's quite obvious how this connects.
Right? And so look, why would you remove
their check? They they the same thing happened
under Biden's administration because you suddenly deemed them
know that they are the Iranian government. It's
just about manipulation. It's about control.
Now strike on Iranian frigate triggers debate over
law, morality, and congressional authority. Now, this is
from military.com,
and this is important.
This came out today. The Iranian frigate, the
IRIS or IRIS Dina had left had just
left the exercise, the Milan exercise.
That's just the name of it. I'm not
sure. It's just a m I l a
n. The a multinational
Indian naval exercise
involving ships from 74 nations
when a US submarine
fired a single Mark 48 torpedo into her
hull South of Sri Lanka on March 4.
The blast killed over 80 of her approximately
a 180 man crew. 32 survivors were pulled
from the water by Sri Lanka's navy. The
rest are still missing. The submarine departed without
attempting a rescue, which, by the way, is
against international law because there wasn't any threat,
or alerting anyone.
Congress never authorized the war.
This is military.com,
guys, and that matters. That we we know
that, but the the reason they're mentioning it
is important. The ship had just participated in
naval exercises
alongside American personnel.
So there again, there's the second example from
what the fact check that Elon or whoever
else put on, but here's also military.com arguing
they actually did participate. So what I believe
is that the the mil that the submarine
was part of what they were doing in
some way or just, I guess, present while
it was there. Because that's the reporting I
saw. They showed up with it.
But either way, the point is that they
ended up abusing the situation.
And it says, and it says,
and the ship, some argue, may have been
unarmed.
And we'll get to that more in a
second. International law scholars from former Pentagon officials
and members of Congress
have since debated whether the strike was legal,
whether The US violated its obligations under the
Geneva Convention by leaving survivors in the water.
I mean, it's not whether they did. It
is. It's clear. That's the reality. They didn't
do it. And they this was off the
coast of Sri Lanka. It wasn't right next
to everybody. There was no threat as far
as I could tell.
Of course, they can just lie about that,
and then that's what happens. They can get
away with it because they just lie. That's
that's what our government does.
International,
goes continues,
says, and whether the president had constitutional authority
to order the strike in the first place.
Now this is the important part.
You understand, guys? Like, if this if they
had gone to congress
and declared war and got a declaration of
war, this arguably would even be legal
because technically any enemy ship and you could
get into small nuances and and, you know,
debate points. But at the end of the
day, it's at war with somebody, then those
ships are considered military targets
even with international law. But
he didn't declare war.
There is no authorization for use in military
force. So, again, that relieves the War Powers
Act, which means the only way that would
be allowed is if he had an imminent
threat that he responded to. He did not.
He admitted that despite how Rubio tried to
give him a bone. He still said, no.
I did it first. I'm the one. Me.
I'm in charge. That's what he does.
Even though it hurt him.
So
what they're saying is that if that's the
case, which it was, he didn't have con
constitutional
authority to attack that ship.
That's the fact. Now look. You could stand
back and go, I don't think any of
that should matter.
That's a different point. And look. We can
have a debate about that. But your debate
is the constitution shouldn't matter when we don't
want it to. Make the
argument. Sure. It doesn't align with everything else
you're claiming you're fighting for, but that's the
argument. Because the truth is it is there.
We are dealing with it. You pretend you
care about it, and that hasn't been met.
Iran's government moved quickly to characterize the ship
as defenseless.
Iran's ambassador to India told reporters that it
was unarmed in a regular maneuver at sea.
Former Indian no. Before I keep going further,
I do have it up here in a
second. But to add right here, remember what
Hegseth came out and said about this?
He didn't give you all these details, did
he? He comes out and goes, we sank
a ship with a submarine. First time is
World War two. We're so great. Our military
is great.
Kinda failed to admit that he tricked them,
and they didn't know he was there, and
that they used the guys of diplomacy and
possibly being unarmed. You're so strong. Hey, Seth.
You're powerful. Like, that's so embarrassing. Like, you
couldn't be honest about that? You had to
lie about it because that and that's because
look. Think about it like as every other
point we've said. If you have to lie
about it, clearly, then it's not the full
picture, is it?
That that they're not doing what they claim
they are, or that they're violating the law,
and they need that point. I just it's
just weird. Former Indian diplomat,
Conwell Sybil, the one we showed you, who
served as Indian's foreign secretary from 2002 to
2003,
amplified the claim on social media, asserting that
it had been participating ships under peace protocol
barring them from carrying live ammunition, which is
a that is I've I've seen, in particular,
these Milan events, there's examples where they were
told not to bring munitions for certain circumstances.
Whether that and it's not always the case.
But whether that that was the case here,
funny how we've yet to find out as
far as I can tell.
India could clear this up right away.
Now watch as it never gets acknowledged. You
know, stuff like that is always how this
goes, and that would always answer it for
me.
The Press Information Bureau,
India's government press office, published a detailed account
of the Milan twenty twenty six's sea phase
confirming that live firings as part of the
surface gun as of surface gun shoots as
well as anti air firings were also undertaken
by participating vessels. If a blanket ammunition ban
governed the exercise, it was not reflected in
the account India itself provided. Now, the reason
that's important is because what I'm discussing is
whether or not they were unarmed when this
happened. And that's different than what he said
there, right? Because the and the possible language
barrier from the other person.
Because the other part of this, this is
what I'm referring to when I look this
up about these previous exercises, is in some
cases, they're And it tends to be in
security circumstances,
like kind of right now, that they would
say don't know ammunition. But that seems to
be the rare example. The one I thought
was more relevant was the idea that they
would bring only what was needed for the
exercise and then expend that at the exercise.
So if that was the case, which is
I'm interested in, that would mean they were
effectively defenseless. But then my thought is why
would they ever put themselves in that position?
And, secondarily, that would mean that The US
showed up with enough to be able to
fire on them afterward, which means they would
have violated that too, unless they weren't even
involved. But you see all these all these,
you know, un you know, this is what
this comes down to and why they created
this way. Like with the shootings. Right? Pretty
good or pretty or any number of the
past examples or the Trump discussion,
Tyler Robinson. Like, because they they it ends
up where nothing is defined. There's all these
gaps and holes because it makes it impossible
to truly see it.
I think that's what we're dealing with in
all of these things. That's kind of a
design in a way. But either way, as
it continues,
the possibility remains that they might have been
unarmed with it, and that's probably being discussed.
My point is most people want Modi to
come out and and then publicly acknowledge one
way or the other. But he could obviously
still be lying, and he's clearly got allegiances,
but it would make a difference.
Whether the Dina specifically had her weapon systems
loaded when she departed on February 25 remains
unconfirmed. Just continue. That's basically to a degree
what I was saying.
And it said it it remains to be
it remains unconfirmed by an official source on
either side, which is interesting.
Under the law of naval warfare,
the question may be beside the point, but
I agree with that. A warship's status as
a lawful military target derives from its flag
and its function in conflict. So you're not
gonna get this from all the Steven Miller
types. It's Iran. Kill them is kind of
the mindset right now. There are guiding practices
here, and that's not about woke. It's not
about Democrats. It's about
guidance and some kind of, you know, limitations.
So it's not just a free for all
mania. And that's the point is we're trying
to always act like we're bringing it to
a point where we're better and more unified
and law, you know, but what they're doing
is the opposite. You're creating a world where
there's nothing sacred, where this new actor who
randomly wants to lash out will come the
same way.
Nothing's off the table, not your family, not
your not politicians versus military. It just becomes
a which, as I pointed out, our governments
have been like that our entire lives. So,
in effect, that's always what they've been doing,
but I've never seen it to this degree.
And at least they pretended, right? I mean,
the point is that there was other countries
and other ways that push back. But here
we are where they're just going all out.
The woke international law is not gonna guide
our actions anymore. Why do you think that's
on top of this happening? Because Israel needs
that. Because their entire genocide has been based
on the idea that what they're doing is
justified. So, if Trump can effectively create that
worldview, well, they can argue that what they
did was,
justified.
I think that's simple.
But it's going on to say so, again,
the flag
derives from its flag, the lawful target, and
its function in conflict. Not just being an
Iranian ship, but what it's doing.
Not the state of her magazines at a
given moment.
Under the same laws, even unarmed merchant vessels
flying an enemy flag can be sunk during
an armed conflict, provided certain conditions are met.
See, people like this just don't want there
to be limitations on what they can do.
Again, maybe you even agree with that, but
let's acknowledge this is what that creates is
chaos,
terrorism,
And that's what
they're doing, including visit and search procedures.
The dino was an Iranian navy war vessel
transit transiting the Indian Ocean while her country
was in open conflict with The United States,
not declared war, which is different. As such,
a warship flying an enemy flag is a
valid military target. But whether The United States
was lawfully at war is a question. The
strike off Sri Lanka was forced to open
debate.
Wes Bryant, air force, a former air force
special operations targeting expert and former chief of
civilian harm assessments at the Pentagon
called the strike illegal.
Quote, was the warship actively posing a threat
or participating in hostilities? Which matters.
You cannot say that that this warship was
an imminent threat to anyone by targeting. And
it doesn't mean that you have to wait
for them to be firing on you. The
point is that they're involved in conflict versus
being a part of a diplomatic
event.
And it says by targeting it, the Trump
administration saying that the imminent threat is all
of Iran's government and military. Well, if so,
that's an incredibly dangerous example mil of military
overreach.
But I guess that's okay because we're powerful.
No. You know, I could even stand back
and argue like that. I'm not even saying
maybe I could make an argument for why
that would limit the ability to defend yourself.
Right? I mean, make the arguments. I I
I would I love debates like that. Challenging
what I already think should be, like, maybe
it opens my mind to something new. But
I'm honest enough to acknowledge that whether or
not we think differently, that's the current reality
of the law.
So you either follow it or you don't.
And if you're not, well, then you can't
hold anybody else accountable for not following the
law you think they should or lying about
them doing as such.
USS,
Pekini, a navy destroyer originally slated to represent
The United States at Milan, diverted to Singapore,
February 15. Now this is my point. They
knew they were gonna do this. This is
before the exercises even began.
So they decided to randomly divert the ship
they claimed was gonna go, and it seems
they showed up a single p p eight
four Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft
flew the exercise
according to off
or most likely reality that what we're talking
about is that the US government had an
opportunity to make themselves look powerful
and get a small political win while maybe
they're losing this war. And so what we
see
is them go, we'll pull back the ship.
We'll show up with the submarine and said,
no one's gonna say anything. We'll we'll take
part. And then when they leave, we'll follow
them, and we'll sink their ship. And we'll
claim like we had a military feat.
Is it is it's what happened as far
as I can tell.
The navy left its perimeter maritime patrol and
anti and anti submarine warfare platform to fly
drills alongside Iranian naval assets,
including the Dina
before the war began.
Whether that was conscious coincidence
or whether the P8A was building a targeting
picture,
which is what they require to shoot their
torpedoes, it would later share with the submarine,
is a question the Pentagon has not answered.
No official source has alleged a direct connection.
Right? So what's saying,
they had something out there
that basically was mapping this out and the
idea and and look, they're being objective. I
appreciate that. But what we can see and
what we know they're part of, the the
action they tend to take, it appears to
me that they clearly set this up, sort
of like they claim they want negotiations when
they were already planning to bomb them in
that room while pretending to want peace. While
Trump says for New Year's Eve, I want,
you know, world peace. And she looks at
him like, you're crazy because she knows they
just told him they were gonna bomb them.
Right? Or whatever that wasn't, whatever day that
was when that was said.
So I think it's clear.
They planned this.
They used this to get a train on
it. They moved the ship away. They waited
till it was over. They these are there's
a cowardly move, guys.
Warfighters.
What a joke. And I don't mean that
if there's not people who are power you
know, strong military entities. We're talking about the
government that is making you guys look like
this, making you look deceitful and weak.
The US submarine departed after firing Sri Lanka's
navy rec after firing
on the ship,
Sri Lanka's navy received the Dina's distress call
at 05:08AM
local time, launched a joint operation with the
air force, and brought survivors and bodies to,
one of these locations at their at, you
know, their port. More than a 100 crew
members remain unaccounted for. Article 18
of the second Geneva Convention
requires parties to a conflict to search for
and collect shipwreck personnel after navy engagements
to be to the extent military circumstances permit.
Critics have argued The US submarine violated that
obligation by departing the scene.
Now remember, they were they were out there
alone. They were off the coast of Sri
Lanka by all reports and even some, you
know,
mapped out, basically, graphics people have made based
on the data they were given. They were
alone.
There's no point at which I see that
there was a threat.
The conditional language of article 18 itself makes
the question genuinely unsettled because the obligation requires
rescue only to the extent military circumstances permit.
And they could just claim they didn't. Right?
What and that that's what that's what comes
down to a lack of honor. You see?
And that's maybe something that the founding fathers
or whatever we talk about, you know, that's
not really what we're talking about. But same
kind of point, like, wherever the the real,
you know, architects of these were. Because the
founding fathers is a good point because a
lot of things they based this on were
based on the fact that men had honor.
That people were, you know, they would not
their integrity mattered to them. Right? Clearly, that's
not where we are anymore. And so in
this case,
they just don't care. There's no respect there.
And it says whether those circle and it's
not respect for the enemy. It's respect for
ourselves, respect for the law, for the world,
for what we claim we're fighting for. Whether
those circumstances were met South Of Sri Lanka
in uncontested waters far from active fighting is
a question legal scholars have begun to raise,
and including an expert from Pentagon, former. The
Pentagon has not addressed it publicly.
Operation epic fury
launched without a declaration of war
or an authorization of use military force, like
I just told you.
That's the Iran engagement right now. The senate
voted 47 to 53 on Wednesday to reject
a war powers resolution sponsored by Democratic senator
Tim Kaine of Virginia and senator Rand Paul.
See?
Frustrated by that.
Oh, wait. Hold on.
Never mind. Take it back. We have to
reverse. Anyway, so that basically, Ron Rand Paul
and Kim Kane Tim Kane are the ones
putting forward the the restrictions,
and then generally, the group voted up to
vote down.
Just do you expect anything different?
Left and right? So apparently, it seems that
Kane and and, Rand Paul, and then Massey
and Connor were the only ones that wanted
to really push back on this. I shouldn't
say only ones. There was a tab, but
in a sense of, like, pushing it forward.
And then Paul was the only Republican across
party lines. Democratic, senator John Fetterman John Fetterman,
of course, only one to vote against it.
He's he's just such a foe. This guy
is clear. Everything he does is pro Trump
and pro Republican. It's just so funny. But
it goes, the house followed Thursday defeating a
comp companion
resolution sponsored by Ro Khanna and Massey.
Two twenty two twelve to two nineteen.
Four Democrats crossed the aisle to vote against
it.
Always the same.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters the
administration
complied fully with the
nineteen thirty seventy three War Powers Resolution,
while asserting the law itself is unconstitutional.
Okay. Wait a minute. So you're claiming that,
you know, it's just doesn't mean anything. So
you're telling me that's not a law, but
you're applied to it anyway? But you didn't
though. That's the point. You didn't. That would
require an imminent threat. So it's broken. He
knows what he's doing. He's trying to convince
you that they met that. But even if
we technically didn't, it's not even real anyway.
That is a liar. That's a manipulative person.
Why would you say that? Because you know
you're not meeting it, so you already set
yourself up. That's a guy that's saying something
that's already you know, it's like when you
start a debate and you set it up
to explain why you might lose.
That means you know you're gonna lose. That
means you know you don't have your argument.
He says, we comply with the law a
100%, and we're going to continue to comply
with it.
Meaningless.
Because you're breaking the law, as you say
that out loud. So I think this is
quite clear, guys. Despite all the screaming partisan
conversation,
what am I missing?
I mean, even if you wanna claim this
was justified, doesn't it just feel wrong? It
shows you that we are acting like the
things we claim were fight or they are
acting like the things they claim to fight.
When in reality, they are those things and
always have been.
Alonzo points out that no war crime or
no. No. The war crime was violating article
18, which we discussed. Just they are required
to save them. Then all these people are
saying, look. Yes. Naval warfare one zero one.
Thou shall not sink an enemy ship. This
is stupidity.
And they they're so smug and act like
they're so you know, they're wrong too. They
don't understand. And whether they know that and
they're just,
you know, manipulative
or they think they're right because Trump said,
I don't know. But it's all there, and
we see it every day.
He's wrong, guys. And even Alan McLeod get,
like, fact checked by some community note saying,
you know, at the end of the day,
this is an illegal war to start, which
means that doesn't matter.
That's the simple reality. He admitted it wasn't
imminent. So you have not met those requirements.
So you have no legal justification to bomb
anything, let alone a ship far away from
the field you're involved in.
Boarzau points out neither The US nor Iran
have declared war. The ship was on a
diplomatic mission. That's the truth. Now the point
is it yeah. I did leave. Right? Left
from the field of the diplomatic naval exercise.
But the fact that you set it up
that way, on top of the fact, we
have no legal justification to bomb it anyway,
means that this was a violation every which
way you look at it.
Brian Berletic points out that Al well, Alan
here says, Al McLeod, just to answer the
community notes I was mentioning, he says The
United States and Israel have launched a criminal
war of aggression against Iran. Aggression is considered
the supreme international crime under international law. The
US and Israel have not declared war on
Iran, and even if they had done, it
would not have been justified under international law
as they are extremely strict guidelines on when
you can do so. Therefore, the action is
a blatant war crime akin to Japan akin
to Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. Because
the the note said,
sinking an enemy is not a war crime.
See that? And that's the kind of dumb
things that remain despite that that it's just
it's just kills me.
This is the reality of where we are
because what he said is unequivocal, guys.
And as Brian backs up, that one is
correct. This US war launched on a wrong
is criminal under international law. Every death, every
destroyed building, our piece of equipment, military or
civilian, and so you can say the same
thing about many wars since or before.
But yet what happens is we you know,
Syria just carries on,
and it just become and that's what they're
doing now. Well, we have a nuclear war
since so so. So so then you're breaking
law too. I agree.
That's where this goes.
Here's Grock. In case you don't, you know,
in case you haven't read the Constitution, in
case you haven't looked at the War Powers
Act. Like, this is my point, guys. Like,
these things have a use when you're trying
to show people who otherwise ignore all of
the evidence. Like showing you the director of
the IAEA
telling you he lied.
Or you could ask Grok if you think
that's somehow more important, but never take this
at face value. But even Grok is the
point.
According to the US Constitution,
can the US military bomb foreign ships without
a declaration of war?
No.
Bombing foreign
ships would generally constitute an act of war
or initiation of hostilities requiring congressional authorization
via
declaration of war or
AUMF,
just like we said. Unless it's strictly defensive,
e. G, propelling an imminent attack. Weird. It's
exactly what we're talking about. But that's the
point, is it doesn't matter, even when your
own things tells you you're wrong. But here's
what the White House put out on the
fourth about this, what we just talked about.
Right? So they put this out when this
happened, convincing you this was some kind of
some savvy war move.
How pathetic is that? The Iranian ship thought
it was safe in international waters. It wasn't.
The Department of War is fighting to win.
I'm just embarrassed. Like, I'm just every day,
these people make me sick about what they
project to the world, which then people think
we are.
That's just bad, guys. Like, even like, if
you had done this and it was, like,
a move where you secretly tracked them and
came up and they were in the middle
of war, yeah, that's a crafty move. But
what you did was just feckless. It was
cowardly
and also illegal.
John Fetterman
trying to continue to play the game for
the Republican team
on the sixth. Just post another apparently, they
shot on the ship on the fifth. US
forces aren't holding back, and the mission just
attacked the navy. I haven't gone into that
one. And whether that was even well, let's
be real, guys. They didn't declare war, so
that's probably that's illegal. Probably, it is illegal
too.
They have no legal justification to bomb these
ships anywhere.
You can say Obama. Biden too. Yep. I
agree. So too are they breaking the law.
Yeah. Senator Fetterman says, why can't we all
agree that destroying an Iranian drone carrier aimed
at America
and American Israelis and Muslims makes the region
more safe. Okay. Fine.
If you think they were gonna do something
wrong, maybe we should prove that first.
If you think that and you could prove
it, fine. That'd make it more safe, but
it also makes it a crime since you
don't have the legal justification. Right? Right, senator?
Right? Right man fighting for the constitution, we're
told, upholding the law of America. I mean,
come on. These people are ridiculous.
That is meaningless if it's not legal.
And on top of the fact that you've
never in one point ever proven they're doing
any of the things you claim they are.
Brian Grim pointing to Eve Barlow.
These cluster immune missiles are illegal as against
international law.
See,
it's it's just ridiculous.
You know who she is. She's been lying
about it before Israel ever set as far
as I've been seeing her talk about this
post October 7. But watch a single leftist
say anything about one missile suddenly becoming 80.
Watch this.
I didn't even I didn't even I forgot
to do this, actually. See what pops up.
Which is one of my shows, actually.
Or old article, banned weapons used in all
US war theaters and all post island wars.
US used banned chemical, biological, radiological, the cluster
munitions, white phosphorus every single time. Or you're
about to have a white phosphorus, which is
also illegal, regard especially in the daytime, which
is almost when always when they use it.
Here at Israel, white phosphorus used in Gaza,
Lebanon 2023.
But here, let's just do this one more.
Here's Ukraine. Widespread use of cluster munitions. I
mean, I can keep going forever. The US
has been caught using them. They've been given
they gave them to all their allies. They've
used them in Iraq and Syria.
It's it's constant.
But here she is going, crime.
Well, yeah, nobody should be using them. So
if you can prove that's what's happening, then,
yes, charge them with a crime.
Isn't it ridiculous, though? I mean, it wouldn't
surprise me. Like, I mean, I would call
them both crimes. I wouldn't justify it because
you did it first, but I would understand
why they might feel justified to do it
back since you're doing it to everybody. I
would still call it a crime. Whoever does
it. You see how not difficult that is?
If Iran did it, charge him with a
crime. If The US did it, charge him
with a crime.
You'll never hear people like this do anything
like that because it's always one-sided. But here's
what's crazy. Does she care that they're breaking
the law in Israel or in Gaza or
Syria or Iraq or Lebanon or what they're
doing in Iran? No. Or the fact that
they violate international law constantly or Miller just
lets you know that it's basically woke to
do that in the first place. But they're
breaking the law. Right? Or Israel goes, they're
violating the UN resolution as they violate, like,
75 UN resolutions.
Painful.
I'll include these if you wanna read more.
Now I might have to race off here
longer than I thought, but I want really
one more section. Let me see if I
can get to it. Oh, look. I've got
a whole save thing for cluster bombs. I
probably have, like, 30 articles in there, but
I made the point.
So let's see.
Yeah. I'll try to rush through this real
quick to finish. So at the end of
the day here, guys, Trump says no deal
with Iran to end war without con unconditional
surrender, which is pretty embarrassing seeing as how
it already came out through Israeli media that
very early Trump offered a ceasefire, and they
said no. They said flatly no, which is
a pretty important point to think about.
One, it very clearly demonstrates that they were
in over their head
Or otherwise, they had some other reason to
wanna stop what was happening, even though everything
I'm telling you is that it's all for
saving everybody and freedom and stopping the bad
guy, but let's have a ceasefire.
Or Israel wants to destroy them and Trump
was not wanting to be I mean, who
knows? The end of the day, he tried.
They said no, which shows you that they
are no longer playing around. Because I mean,
in in every other situation I've ever seen,
they show restraint like I've never like nobody.
Like, maybe, say for like Russia and Syria
over and over when Israel bombs and they're
beating attack. But even then, look at how
it ended up. The point is that they
have shown restraint in more ways than I've
ever seen The US even consider using. That
doesn't mean good guy. I've always pointed out
it could just mean that they recognize playing
the counterbalance to the belligerence of the US
government was in their interest to make it
look like they weren't bad. That's certainly objective
possible,
but it matters to me that they've never
been or have demonstrated what they're always claiming.
So he's going unconditional surrender to make himself
sound strong and tough and okay.
Well, Drop Site News reports that Iran has
denied that Trump ever asked about talking. Or,
Iran denies asking Trump to talk. So what
Trump is saying is that they they asked,
can we meet with you? And he goes,
no. Unconditional surrender is all I'll accept.
After the reality was, he offered a ceasefire
a couple days after, and they denied it.
You see how small this is? This man
is incapable of, like, you know, he so
he then jumps out. I mean, of course,
it's all it's possible that they're lying. But
remember how many times they've seen him do
this exact kind of thing, that he needs
to be the one that looks like I,
the one that turned you down.
God, how
uncomfortable it must be to live in his
head. So at the end of the day,
they're now claiming they didn't even ask him.
And which makes sense, seeing as how they
already turned down a ceasefire. Right? And it
says officials say no negotiations will be considered,
just like they said first.
So personally, I think that's really sad. I
think that shows weakness, and I think day
by day, it's making themselves even more look
more weak.
Glenn adds this to the other side from
Israel influencing US government and says the big
boss heard from Assad that Trump was talking
to Iran, that's what we just saw, without
permission and behind his back.
The big boss, meaning Netanyahu, called the White
House and they assumed the boss
assured the boss that they weren't.
Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner report in almost
daily to the boss about Iran
from the IDF's Barak Ravid.
On Monday, Netanyahu called the White House officials
and asked if such talks or exchange messages
happened. The White House told Beebe the Trump
administration wasn't talking to the Iranians behind his
back.
Direct quote. US officials said Steve Envoy, Witkoff,
and Trump's adviser, Kushner, talk almost every day
to Netanyahu
and to the director of Mossad and other
Israeli officials.
Okay.
I guess we'll just pretend like that's not
shockingly alarming and the reality that it shows
you that they're being told what to do
and who actually is driving this war.
And back to the original point. As you
spend or they tell you you're gonna project
potentially spending
a 184
what is that? Trillion dollars? Billion dollars? What
is that? Wait. That's thousand million bill billion
dollars? Just quickly looking at it. So $184,000,000,000.
Like, it's just insane.
On top of everything else we're giving them.
Well, again, it's it's an estimate. Right? I
guess you run it right there.
I got read it earlier. I'm just kinda
kidding. With the end of the day, guys,
this is it's beyond the pale.
From everything we were ever promised, there were
no spending or no more war. Here we
go. More spending, more government, more invasion, more
war, more of everything we swore wouldn't happen,
but it's okay because it's for freedom.
There's Trump
lying to you again.
This is a new post. This is him
saying for the I mean, after everything we
just told you, after he told you he
obliterated what they had,
I think this is because he knows he
needs to sell this again. One, because Israel
wants it, and two, because he knows this
is not gonna stop in a couple of
weeks. Because the legal cited from him, I
think he feels this makes it more valid.
He's also lying, though, or he doesn't know
he's wrong. Hit within two weeks, they would
have had a nuclear weapon. If we didn't
do it Two weeks.
Two weeks.
Nobody, not a single expert in the conversation
who's verified what they currently had, including the
people talking to Witkoff, are will tell you
that's even possible.
Enriching to the point needed, maybe. But making
the missiles and bombs, well, as we told
you, they know because he knows they bomb
these locations, they don't have a place to
even enrich that in rain right now, according
to the experts.
And according to them telling you they bombed
those locations.
It's this is what but they're trapping themselves
with their own lies in the first place
or their own admissions to make themselves look
strong.
Now we're gonna believe in two weeks after
you said they were obliterated. So lying then,
lying now, you can decide.
Or is that not possible? On top of
the fact that Gabbard told us that wasn't
even happening? On top of the fact that
the IAEA told us that wasn't even happening?
The b two attack, a number of months
ago, they would have a nuclear weapon and
so just I'll play it again he may
he's talking about both he said first two
weeks and then nuclear weapon if we didn't
do hit within two weeks they would have
had a nuclear weapon if we didn't do
the b two attack
a number of months ago they would have
a nuclear weapon and
when crazy people have nuclear weapons, bad things
happen.
So we're Yeah. We know. You're doing you're
showing us that all the time, Trump. So
is The UK. So is everybody else that's
doing the same thing. We're very good shape
now. I wanna let you know that, and
we will continue forward.
But, Oh, he said we're in good shape.
So clearly that's true. It's a great display
of military strength and
What is? What is? Did you did you
misalign there?
Within two weeks, they would have had a
nuclear weapon. If we didn't do the b
two attack
a number of months ago they would have
a nuclear weapon
and when crazy people have nuclear weapons bad
things happen
so we're in very good shape now I
want to let you know that and we
will continue forward
But,
it's a great display of military strength
and and Right. Again, what? I think he
skipped the line or something because, I mean,
this is what happens lately. I feel like
he is stressing. Like, there's whether he's just
getting old or what, which he is old,
but there shouldn't be a nine. That's obvious.
80, whatever he is, that's that's where people
start having issues. My point
is that he just is we're doing great,
strong, great, and powerful, and wrong, bad.
Very proud to have with some of the
people in the room,
both senators and congressmen, we rebuilt and women.
We
Very woke of you, Trump. Thank you.
Well,
not true. Right? I mean, do we need
to do it again? Put the hundred millionth
time of Gabbard literally telling you that's not
true. Right? Or this is just funny. Here's
Mark Levin. And I'll I'll I'll show you
this yet again because it's important to recognize
the reality of this statement and how important
it is. And they could be lying too.
Right? But it's not about taking anything at
face value. It's about looking at the evidence
at hand
and what doesn't exist. And all we have,
other than Trump claiming and Israel claiming, both
of which have lied to us endlessly in
the last thirty seconds, let alone last year,
compared to the evidence we can see, which
shows you that's not what they're doing. So
here,
Emily Kopp
writes about the interview. I'm kinda making fun
of it. About, Mark Levin, who's just this
guy.
He goes, it's a sad day indeed when
a news breaking interview with Steve Witkoff. He's
basically angry that nobody covered this, and I
think we know why it's not being not
being covered even by his own people in
in regard to, like, conservatives.
He says,
it's a sad day indeed when news breaking
interview with Steve Witkoff where he laid out
in detail for nearly forty minutes the shocking
information, meaning lies about everything that happened, and
events that occurred during the three meetings. Everyone's
called them out for lying, by the way.
I mean, like,
hit the people involved, not even just from
the Iranian side. Diplomats claim Trump's envoy undermining
Iran talks.
Steve Witkoff's description of key conversations
were false.
That's exactly where we're going with this. So
he sits down with him,
Levin, who has the same agenda, and they
lie together, and they sell you on the
narrative that they were bragging. That's what he
gets into. Bragging about their 60%. There are
bombs coming.
Same thing I just proposed, but he's doing
it again on this show. But guess what?
Even his own team didn't wanna hear this.
And it says, it occurred during the three
meetings with the Iranian regime negotiators. Not a
single so called major news outlet reported on
it. In fact, many of our conservative outlets
have ignored it as well.
Oops. Yeah. Because they know what you're doing.
And, I mean, like, understand that most I
mean, I'm I'm surprised even that, like, the
larger conservative platforms didn't. I'm sure some of
them didn't. You know which ones. But my
point is that the conservative base,
they know you what you're doing right now.
That's what I'm trying to be able to
see. They recognize what Israel is doing to
this country. I'm so glad to see it.
And it's not about Judaism. If you're not
paying attention, it's about Zionism. And, yes, there's
a Judaism connection to that, most definitely. But
look into the origins and find out Herzl
was an atheist himself who founded Zionism. The
point is, yet we what he said makes
crystal clear why POTUS decided to take military
action, and why decided and dis what he
decided what and why he decided. Instead, we
hear endless claims that military action was unnecessary.
So what's he doing?
Literally focusing on the single point. They were
gonna build bombs and we know it.
Well, again, no, everyone else said you were
I mean, it's not even just this one
point, guys. They were caught repeatedly
lying about many different I mean, even going
back to Gaza, guys. These people have been
caught repeatedly lying about everything they're involved in.
He continues to say they came in and
bragged about 465
kilograms at 60% and bragged about violating safeguards.
Well, yet again, guys, this is the twenty
twenty five June
director general report from the International Atomic Energy
Agency.
Trump would tell you this is the group
that's supposed to decide whether they're doing the
wrong thing.
And, again,
their location, the Fardoe, is the one that
enriches 60%.
The agency is not aware of any damage.
That should show you that there weren't being
the risks. Right? And it says, as stated
in my most recent report to the agency's
board of governors and based on inspections conducted
at the relevant facilities since then, Iran's
uranium stockpiles
remain under safeguards in accordance with Iran's comprehensive
safeguard agreements.
Remains under safeguards in accordance with their agreements.
And it says that you may recall
more than 400 kilograms, that's the four sixty
five he's lying about,
of that stockpile is enriched to 60%,
which is, as the sentence makes clear before
it, within safeguards
and their agreement.
It is essential that the agency resumes inspections.
Basically, the point is since the twelve day
war discussion, they've been in some kind of,
you know, point attention, now more conflict, so
they haven't been able to go and investigate.
Nobody's arguing that they could have they were
other than Trump and their manipulators that they
were doing anything be since then. Or really,
as Trump told you or the evidence suggests,
they don't have the enrichment facilities needed to
do what they're claiming.
And what if they even wanted to, which
the evidence shows they don't. That's what everyone
will tell you, what the experts will tell
you. They don't ever want to. They're not
trying to. Could they somewhere secretly? Of course.
I care about the facts. And they follow-up
at the end that the IAEA can guarantee
through a watertight inspection system that nuclear weapons
will not be developed and run. But here
they are, Levins crying about how nobody wants
to listen to them because all they wanna
do is lie for Israel and everyone's starting
to find out.
Now, you know, I'm gonna leave it here
just for time because I'm just in general,
I think
I'm rapid here for the most part.
But I'll what I was gonna point out
was just the, you know, the lies of
this person saying, Ron was not being carpet
bombed.
And it was they posted the image themselves,
guys. They posted the image of Tehran in
downtown, and it was very clearly indiscriminate. And
that you get liars online and just go,
that's not true. I believe this guy's got
a pretty big following.
237,000
followers. Right? They're just lying. And I don't
even know if they know that, guys.
This is the reality I want you to
think about or rather the the point rather,
I believe. It the Mohammed Safa from, UN,
what is he? The dip in that. Israel
is con covertly launching suicide drones to attack
Gulf countries
and blaming them on Israel, which I had
a suspicion about this. This is being reported
by Sky News. So my point is I'm
I'm no way suggesting that they weren't bombing
these locations. I think they have a legal
right to because they were belligerents. That's what
Iran said. But on top of that, I
think Israel's sending these things out to bomb
certain locations to try to blame it on
them. That's even what Sky News is reporting.
So, I I mean, at least consider that.
We know they're capable of that. I'm not
gonna suggest for a second that Iran's not
capable of bombing things they shouldn't. But think
about that possibility with what we know is
going on in the world.
Iraq, I think I mentioned this yesterday or
day before yesterday about what's going on, the
blackout. Right? Well, suddenly,
I told you, like, there's there's this was
by there's there's action going on in Iraq.
It's this was something done by them to
put them in a position.
So here we are. There are multiple reports
of US special forces in Iraq clashing with
Iran
groups, or rather they claim Iran well, Iran
backed, I wouldn't dispute, other than the way
they try to frame that as Iran groups,
but the sense that they support them is
very clear.
Heavy clashes continue. So they're fighting what PMU,
most likely. But what's interesting is they're claiming
they're trying to bring some of the Kurds
from Iraq
into
Iran,
which aren't the same thing. But it's interesting
because these things are somewhat overlapping. Right? So
the PMU is the groups that have they've
always bombed claiming they're fighting Iran when really,
they're just Iran
they share ideology.
It goes back to when there was invasions
of Iraq. It is reported that the helicopter
landings were carried out, and they're basically interesting
that you have US troops in the ground
fighting
groups that seem technically be not connected at
all to what's going on. So now we're
active war in in Iraq yet again.
Thanks, Trump. Makes sense, doesn't it?
And you have Ynet News. Israel backing Kurdish
plan to seize border areas in Iran.
Same exact time, you've got Trump calling on
Kurds to aid the effort to overtake Iran.
Totally not illegally manipulating the situation. Like, this
is what they denied in Syria.
That was my point. Is Trump just not
aware he's not supposed to be honest about
this? Does he think that Obama did it
so I can? I don't even know. Or
is Israel just wanting us to see it?
They're literally funding insurgents to manipulate the government.
That's not supposed to be how this works,
guys. And the reality of it is that
this has always been going on. This has
been reported they were funding and arming them,
which goes back a long way. But well
before they they were in the middle of
peace talks when they knew they were gonna
do this
and and the bombing too.
So again,
they're in this location attacking
PMU elements or or you could argue that
Iran is president of Iraq. It wouldn't surprise
me with what's going on. And on top
of that, they're sending Kurds from there into
Iran, which arguably from Israeli media has already
started a ground invasion.
And here's what Iraq's government said. He's referenced
first, he wrote, Iraq has officially confirmed the
presence of a foreign military landing in the
desert, which is what you were just hearing.
The official statement reported one Iraqi soldier killed
and two wounded while investigating the unannounced troops.
So now you got Iraqi soldiers caught up
in this, but not aware they're not even
trying to speak, which makes sense with what
Trump does everywhere.
Doesn't feel like he has to tell anybody.
So it seems the Iraq government has no
idea what's going on. Iraq will formally request
clarification and issue a protest notice to the
global coalition.
Not that Latin like Trump cares or Biden.
He is referring to the presence of thousands
of Syrian Kurdish forces that were hired
by The US and Israel to open a
new front against Iran.
See my point? So it's like it's all
flushing out right now, and it's not honest,
guys. It's just it's it's pretty obvious that
this is not honest
and and and illegal.
Now lastly, IDF chief of staff outlines his
new phase of the war
against Iran and Lebanon, by the way,
casualty including the thing that they claimed wasn't
happening, which has always been happening. And that's
their statements, by the way. Iran it says,
on Iran and Israel will escalate strikes and
aimed at weakening the Iranian state. We will
intensify the blow to the foundations of so
what they're essentially to cut to the chase.
Israel is
broadening to what we always told you they
would. We're fighting Iran, but Iran means everywhere
we're fighting.
So every one of them.
You Houthis, Yemen, Lebanon. Right? So this is
all this is the greater Israel project. Funny
how Israel decides to broaden this out to
multiple countries. Even though The US told you
it was gonna be a limited strike on
Iran, it's gonna be over.
So who's in control? Is anybody even debating
that?
There this is being publicly discussed by the
Israelis.
Here, by the way,
is to Motrich
saying, but,
Beirut in Lebanon suddenly will look just like
con Yoonas.
This is who we're dealing with, and these
two people, them and Ben Gavir, are two
of the most influential people in the Israeli
government, arguably, debatably, some from some people's mind
have more influence based on the fee the
groups they influence over Netanyahu.
And
and Kabir comes out and says, the children
of Gaza are not innocent. They are delayed
a delayed threat that must be completely eliminated.
By the way, he said this more than
once. I've seen him say this. He's I've
seen him
you can go back to the
him dancing with the the Ollie kid that
they they killed, the settlers.
What was it?
There it is.
Robert covered this a while back. Just include
it since we mentioned it. Since you can
literally see the article from Israeli Times, Jewish
extremist taunt, all these on the grill at
slain toddlers relatives. Here's Ben Gavir in this
in this video
dancing with an image of the baby right
there, literally dancing, chanting, all these on the
grill.
These are settlers who burned the family's home
down with the baby inside, and they laughed
about it. Ben Gavir is in there dancing
with them. This is who we're talking about,
guys.
And these are the people that are right
now in driving this through Netanyahu as well.
We're gonna make Beirut look like communist, first
of all, and that we're gonna kill every
single Gazan because we always plan to. Openly
saying that, and we all debate about what's
going on.
Douglas McGregor mentioned, as I told you, the
satellite imagery confirms
the damage to the radar in Qatar that
they kind of lied about.
And like I said, he's when he makes
these statements, you should consider it. And I
don't ever blindly trust it because it's just
text on Twitter. But he has a track
record of, you know and here, this is
the report now coming from foreign policy. He
says, had seen unconfirmed reports that Iran destroyed
a huge expensive radar system
central to Patriot and THAAD and Qatar,
and foreign policy casually confirms it. Says it
will take five to eight years to rebuild.
This is a really big deal. This is
what speaks to more the the idea that
they're losing this, or at the very least,
not as a good footing as they claim.
Because what he says, they took out their
eyes.
It's a big deal. It's also a lot
of money, a $1,100,000,000
system that they just
destroyed.
Or not jest, but and it goes on
to say, Iran appears to have carried out
a precision strike. I'll I'll get into this
more in the next show. What I wanna
point out is that this possibly or this
is being called war crime.
This is a, a civilian building. But what
drop site news is pointing out is that,
the geolocation suggests one of the sites
is luxury apartments. The strikes come days after
Washington Post reported a diplomatic cable, noting that
US personnel staying in the hotels could be
targeted and that you two US Defense Department
employees were injured. Following that incident, the US
Embassy warned Americans to avoid the hotels.
What their point was
right here. Where was it? The senior army
official compiled.
There's one other point I thought I had
near. I think it's this one. Oh, that
one too. That's right. So the point is
that, you know, it's debatable, right,
based on what's going on. I would argue
that a civilian location, especially if these are
people staying in there, US personnel or otherwise,
who are not active in the fight, then
that's a crime.
And that's what we should call it. But
you have to see you see where this
goes? Look at what The US is doing.
This is the conversation from yesterday and and
everything else we're talking about. They're driving the
warfare into
chaos.
Even though it's always been warfare and care,
they they at least there was some semblance,
some at least lie that even somewhat guided
your actions. They had to outwardly look like
you were doing the right thing. So here
we are, where you can argue that they
bombed this location because there's US personnel. Well,
just like they bombed a room full of
politicians, which should have been off their off
limits.
And in this likely killed other people. I
call that a war crime. But you could
understand that Iran would act this way knowing
that The US doesn't see any targets off
limits. You see how quickly that escalates? And
the argument is the US did that, and
they responded, which makes them just as bad,
just like it makes The US just as
bad when they do the same thing.
See how that works? Consistency and logic is
not difficult, guys. But the point is, I
I'm interested to see how this fleshes out.
Because if it does turn out, like we've
seen in the past, where there's a different
circumstance,
like it would be on either side. If
you find out, for example, that the, that,
you know, whatever we're discussing turned out to
be some secret base like Tel Aviv and
the bottom that they finally admitted, that would
make it a legal target. I don't think
that's the case, though. My gut would tell
me this is them if this isn't what
happened because it's still being freshly reported. They
bomb this because they are you are targeting
anywhere they are now because they've set that
precedent.
That's that's disgusting. That's where they're driving this.
This is the moment they they're reporting that
Iranian USV struck a Bohemian flagged oil tanker
in the Northern Persian Gulf.
Now, this one says fake news. And Grok
says, the incident depicted in the video, a
drone blast striking this ship, has not been
independently confirmed. Doesn't mean false like I just
told you because Grok seems to be all
up in the mixed up right now. But
what we're seeing is a lot of this
flying around.
So I'll follow-up on this and see if
we can find out whether this is just
a fake thing or, you know, whatever else.
But right now, be careful. There's a lot
of BS going around. And and on top
of that, like I said, realize where we've
been where everything's been driven to because of
how they're incessantly continuing illegal actions.
And then, of course, we have Starmer going,
I said I wouldn't get involved, but now
things have changed. Yeah. What changed is your
allies conducting legal tax.
So he act him acting like that's now
moral obligation. It's just they're such cowards. And
I said, I am shocked. I tell you
I'm shocked.
Carney flipping two, he says. You know? Of
course. Did anybody think for one second there
they wouldn't get, you know,
just be forced in because they're all feckless?
Well, at the same time, Russia reportedly
is now aiding Iran's war effort by providing
intel on US targets.
Watch as they call that terrorism or something
ridiculous. Watch.
But it shows you how it's escalating, guys.
Apparently, China as well as to condemning this
and getting involved. This is there's just I
don't see any way this doesn't get out
of control, especially with Israel making that happen,
unless if The US doesn't pull back.
This, just to end, just puts the cherry
on top, guys.
So the peace president. Right? So here we
are in the midst of this war. He
wants to tell you it's absolutely necessary, but
it's only because terrorism and bad and whatever
else. And, you know, he's ending the forever
wars by ending the one they started forty
seven years ago. Whatever their stupid narrative is
that's not true.
He was next.
Or and Israel Turkey said Turkey. Israel said
Turkey too. Plenty more coming your way for
the not forever wars that Trump's not gonna
get you involved in. Here's what he said.
Same meeting from earlier, but he he literally
said this.
Your next one is gonna be we wanna
do that special
Cuba, he's waiting, but he says, let's get
this one finished first.
We could do them all at the same
time, but bad things happen. If you watch
countries over the years, you do them all
too fast,
bad things happen. We're not gonna let anything
bad happen to this country.
Right. So the point is Cuba.
Cuba's next.
Right? So he's literally looking at, like, you
know, Rubio, like, basically saying, oh, don't worry.
We're gonna get to Cuba next.
Now look, you might go, well, he's just
kidding. Right? Because he knows Rubio wants. He's
he's joking around.
Okay. Well, he also said to Dana Bosch.
Cuba's going to fall pretty soon. And we
also saw him in that recent interview on
the plane, on the what? Air Force One,
where he said the same thing. Oh, Cuba's
going down. And Lindsey Graham basically wetted himself.
He was so excited.
I don't know why we can't see where
this goes, and I don't know why the
honest people in the conservative movement can't call
this out enough. A lot of you are.
Also, call out the ridiculous people in the
partisan game that are acting like this isn't
obvious.
Either side.
Because it's not just Republicans that want this
war, guys. Clearly,
he's you know, don't worry. We'll get there.
Cuba's next. Don't worry.
How do we call this anything but what
it is, guys?
Well, long show, guys. Thank you for tuning
in today.
Well, I the plan is to get to
a show tomorrow, but I mean, I'll decide
based on this. But see, I don't wanna
do that. The hard thing for me is
when I get these long shows,
I ultimately I kinda wanted to I don't
wanna jump into another one tomorrow because people
haven't caught up, but I just, I think
I, right now, I'm just on this path
where I wanna make these consecutive. And I'm
gonna keep trying to do that. But thank
you for tuning in tonight.
And please, please
find the courage, find the integrity
to say what's right, not to be cowed
by left or right
or anything for that matter.
Trust your heart. You know what's right. You
know what I mean, the the we've we've
lived with this our entire lives.
We can see this as plain as day.
It just takes courage to be able to
call it out, knowing that you're gonna have
some jackal out there yell down on your
throat about why you don't know and you
never paid attention.
Just trust your trust your heart, guys. I
think that's so important. It's such good advice.
It doesn't mean you're always right. That's not
the point. Right? But if you, you know,
you gotta follow your instincts, your gut, what
you believe is right. And and then and,
you know,
checker that or whatever the right phrase would
be with facts, with intelligence, with research, with
due diligence.
But it matters. You know, I do believe
deeply that there is a level of instinct,
like something innate that drives us.
And I know I just know it. I
talk to people every day. I've been doing
this long enough that I see it, guys,
people. This is why you see the people
who are even, you know, dishonest people out
there playing the partisan game that are all
they're suddenly starting to go, well, yeah. You
know, it shouldn't be. And Trump's he didn't
do that because they know it. They see
you, the honest person, out there going, okay.
This is too much.
And they want to continue to get your
support.
Right? People like platforms like this, I don't
want your support based on me telling you
what you wanna hear. I want your support
because you know that I'll tell you the
thing you don't wanna hear. I want your
support because I will tell you what I
believe is the truth, even if it's what
nobody believes, if I believe it.
That matters to me more than anything. And
I know you were I know you agree,
and that's why you're here. So
hopefully, I'll see you tomorrow. That's the plan.
Plenty more to talk about.
I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.