Back to is it war?
World War one. War. Correct. World War two.
War. Correct. The Vietnam War. War. Oh, I'm
sorry, Carl. That was a congressionally authorized counter
offensive. Don't worry. We get right back on
track with the Korean War. War.
No. That was police action. No. They had
tanks and stuff. Well, the police have tanks
now, don't they, Carl? Okay. The first and
second Iraq war. War. They identify
as military action. It's a bit like pronouns
except we kill people. Alright. How about Libya?
War.
I'm sorry. That was kinetic action, not a
war. Venezuela.
Well, it was a it was a or
that's a war, I think. No. I'm sorry.
That was a law enforcement operation, not a
war. Iran.
It's a war. We're doing war things. No.
Not war things. Preemptive retaliatory de escalation action.
No. That's that's that's not a thing. Alright.
Judges?
Okay. How about the war on terrorism?
War.
No. It was a coalition led conditional operation.
How about Afghanistan?
Afghanistan was the war on terror. No. I'm
sorry. That was a pre authorized defense stabilization
initiative. Okay. Can somebody tell me the rules
here?
War on poverty, Carl. Poverty? That's not even
a I'm sorry. I hate to do this
to you. It's a trick question. We don't
have poverty in The United States. The Dow
went up to 50,000. Can I even get
that high? Amazing. Don't even worry about the
Epstein files. War on Christmas.
The coffee cup thing? No. That's not a
war. It was a war for the soul
of the nation and whether or not I
can wish my children Merry Christmas. Okay. You
know what? I quit. I don't wanna do
this anymore. Today's magical phrase, Carl, you just
became a United States congressman.
Congratulations,
representative Carl. Merry Christmas. It's March. Well, okay.
Happy Hanukkah.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Reality. Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Help your own people. Help your own people.
Analyst and joy.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 03/08/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
You know, I I I often it's what
we discuss on the show is very serious.
Yeah. I mean, 99%
of what we get into is is important,
serious. You know, it affects people's lives. And
so I try to have a level of
decorum with the show. You know, that's why
I feel like it's important to to, you
know, just act the part. Right? And not
necessarily in a, you know, other than you
should be kind of way or not who
you usually are, but just that it that
things like this necessitate a certain level of
seriousness. All that's be said that I felt
today, after everything we've been I just we're
at a weird place in this country. And
and it's not necessarily different than what we've
seen before, but it's at a level that
I haven't seen before. And it's
the last few days, but today in particular,
I'm just like
like, those kind of like you laugh or
cry kinda moments. Right? I mean, we're we're
I I I still argue very strongly, and
I hope you guys consider this every time
I bring it up, that I feel like
we are at a point where there's a
lot of very at least opportunity for real
change, and that's why it's very uncomfortable.
But that doesn't change the fact that it's
uncomfortable and that there's a lot of very
kind of, you know, cognitive dissonance moments for
Americans in this country to
grappling with things that they don't necessarily want
to be the case but are being forced
to acknowledge are real.
And so sometimes you just gotta laugh at
how crazy it is. You know? And I
felt like that was needed to
it's important. You know? And so it as
much as that still did make a very
real point, that's
in on top of the fact that it's
just that ridiculous and that obvious what's being
done and always has been, just again, to
a lever higher degree than I've seen, but
no different from left and right. But the
world sees that. And let's also point out
their governments are largely similar, if not exactly
the same, but the but still the moment
of people laughing at the way this country
is operating. And in many cases, looking at
it as representative of Americans. I don't think
that's the case. Not really.
But it is where we are. That's how
ridiculous this is, and it might as well
just be a Saturday Night Live skit because
it feels ridiculous. We're watching them tell you
things that we know aren't true, and then
just playing this game that contradicts things they've
said before or what they say is gonna
happen later.
Now I also wanna start out by pointing
out that,
I completely forgot about the time change today.
And I started late
later than I usually do and I figured,
oh, it's okay. No. We're much later than
usual today. And so for that point, two
things,
I'm likely gonna I mean, we'll see. I
may end up just going through it all,
but probably cut it short to some degree.
Whatever I don't cover in today's show, I'll
I'll probably point to at the end that
I will get to tomorrow.
But it just be that being said, it
is very late for me anyway, so it
might just be cut quite short. But there's
a lot to get to today that I
wanted to include.
And even on top of that, a lot
that we I'm not even gonna get to
today.
But generally speaking, what we're gonna talk about
and I the way I've organized today, I
have a few things I wanted to get
out of the
get into the conversation right away. And that's
some updates on these stories we've been covering.
For example, the the the naval exercise discussion
and follow-up reports about that ship being unarmed.
And I think that's very important. But still,
you could still argue with you know, I'll
question everything as always. That's how we should
always look at it. But it's important to
see
well, I'll get into we get there, but
that's reports we're talking about and another update
on the Manabh school bombing, showing that it
does appear to be a US missile that
hit it, which we already know, but these
are important to see. And, some follow-up points
around the school, but I wanna get into
a really important part part, point early in
the conversation
that is that is reports.
It's not necessarily provable. It's really and but
it's it's very important for a lot of
different reasons that I think we discussed this
early around the conversation of not just deployment,
which I'm I mean, I've said this for
a very long time. Whether we're talking about
Iraq or any other situation, I'm very much
of the mind that they already have assets
on the ground. I think that's I mean,
I for a lot of reasons, I think
all governments are doing similar things. But whether
it's intelligence or just, you know,
under the guise of diplomacy
or USAID, NED kind of things. But on
top of that, I think it's quite clear
that there has been operations. Even if we're
talking about the Kurds, and we'll get to
that in the show if we get to
it today, the whole thing of Trump going,
I don't want them to be involved. Well,
that's ridiculous seeing as how you've already paid
them, armed them, and sent them in to
Iran. So, clearly, that's him pretending like he's
not involved in that or acting like he
doesn't want it to be because I think
maybe there's too much attention on it. That's
because you guys did it that way.
But, anyway,
I wanna get to this because of the
idea of people being on the ground or
rather being sent there and the reports coming
out of personnel,
servicemen, women, you know, just military
being a rather,
conscientious objector saying that I'm not gonna go
to war, many of which I'm seeing saying
outrightly, I'm outright, I'm not gonna go to
war for Israel.
This is a really important thing to see.
As always, I've said throughout my entire time
doing this, in history that I what I've
noticed and very well documented in many books
people discussed over the years,
in every revolution,
the the
the most common factor is when the rather,
I guess, more the,
the straw that broke the camel. What the
what's the
the analogy I'm looking for?
You know? The whatever caused it, like, to
finally happen. Right? The straw that broke the
camel's back. There's a better analogy for that.
But the point is that usually is when
the the enforcement arm
changes. So changes sides, shifts direction. And so,
you know, and you can look back and
find this. And a lot of times, it
happens with coups where they're manipulated or,
you know, paid. But in this case, what
I'm want people to think about is whether
or not we're actually starting to see the
enforcement arm, military, police,
whatever it is, starting to go, you know,
this just isn't right. I don't feel like
this is okay. And many of them already
exist but go along to get along. And
I think what we're seeing is a lot
of service been people just saying, this is
not okay with me. Now, Preisner had an
interesting report that we're gonna get into, claiming
that he's talked to a lot of these
people, and this is what he does, you
know, his activism and and and works with
a lot of military servicemen,
and
finding out that they're being reportedly deployed.
And then on top of that, finding out
that they're being told that they're in fact
going to training, which the argument being because
so many people don't want to do this,
that ultimately they're being, you know I mean,
let's be real. They signed up for this,
and the reality is the military seems to
be able to do whatever they want to
them, which I find insane, but that they're
being told training and then sent to something,
Iran being the implication. And I think that's
just incredible. Now it is a report, but
I wanna get into the supplementary information all
the way around it that makes this seem
far more relevant and important than just the
report itself.
Now Lindsey Graham said something that I think
is just
exactly what's going on, and I'm not sure
exactly why he would say it other than
that this is something that somebody out there,
an entity that I think is dictating a
lot of what's happening, very want much wants
to be seen, but only through Trump. Sort
of like, we want Trump to battle Iran,
so we're not the ones doing it, but
we can make sure we guide it. You
know, this it's all of this. And we've
talked about the great reset
and how this is still continuing to this
very moment. And the reality of him telling
you that Trump is re
resetting the world,
I the language means something. Reimagining. And we'll
go through all of this and how this
is just a continuation and that what's happening
around the world, I think, is very much
a part of that, but I'll give you
my thoughts on it. We'll talk about eugenics
that came up again. I think it's very
important. A lot of propaganda and get into
some updates about
Iran and the bombings taking place, conversations about
the oil prices and the, you know,
oil from a global perspective, but gas prices
when it comes to United States, censorship around
all of this, which seems to be exploding,
and a lot of other points that I
I have a thing about Anthropic. I still
have not gotten into that in-depth in or
rather covered it in-depth. I've been looking into
it for a while now in the background,
and I might not get to it today,
but I was gonna do a part of
it today. But I want you guys to
make sure you're paying attention to what that
how that's playing a factor. I really do
think that just the the AI element in
and of itself,
but Anthropic in particular for whatever part they're
playing in all this with this
DHS kind of, you know, Department of War,
you know, the what we're gonna get into.
Them being told they're a supply chain risk
if they don't do what they're you know,
allow them to be able to use the
AI to kill people autonomously.
But that this to me is the kind
of interconnected point to the larger conversation.
Right? The war
is obviously horrible and going and and the
genocide continuing,
but it's those have been going on a
long time. We've seen wars that it always
wasn't always about, at least at this on
its face, some larger agenda. I do think
that's kind of always the case. But today,
I think we're seeing this kind of AI
like Lavender, Habsora,
Israel, and the way they're using Palantir's AI
to just murder people, and and provably
without human involvement,
despite what they were saying. Because I've seen
this. I've seen it discussed, but I've also
seen them using it with essentially mindless adherence
to just what the AI tells you. And
I think this is the world that's being
built out. And I think it's very important
to think about. So I wanna start well,
I I was I always forget to do
this, and I wanna make sure we shout
this out because,
this was the original place it came from
despite some people out there, Tim Tim Pool
adjacent entity out there, framing it as if
it was their content, but, you know, posting
beneath it that this is somebody else's. It's
just so weird how this platform often works.
But here's the original clip that I think
you guys should see. It's it's it's funny.
It's from Reason, I I guess, and this
is the,
you know, commentary about how ridiculous all of
this is. And, you know, you could always
take it as partisan. Everybody seems to within
the partisan field. They will look for the
parts that stand out. To me, it doesn't
matter what side they think they're fighting for
when they think when when what you're calling
out is obvious. Right? But the the game
they're playing with war, same thing Biden's administration
did with plenty of different words to weasel
around it and act like they're really not
there. I mean, it's an exact example is
Kirby
and Ukraine and the idea of troops marching
in side by side in unison. That's the
only thing that we define as as what
they call it, like, I forget the term,
whether it was just invasion or whatever the
term they were using. And and eventually, that
did happen, and they still pretended that wasn't
it. It's just the way our government operates,
guys.
So on that opening part I talked about,
I wanna give, give some updates on some
of these points that we have been discussing.
The New Republic covered this, and here's the
actual,
original,
arc, excuse me, platform website that actually posted
this. I'll I'll show you just where it
says that. The report simply being the most
chilling detail in The US attack on an
Iranian naval ship. And if you forgot this
story, the simple quick reality is that they
were part of a naval exercise, And I
that that it has fleshed out to appear
exactly like I thought the case was, which
is that they showed up with the submarine.
And, ultimately, the report was they were supposed
to be there with the ship. They, last
second, pulled it out, the US government.
Well, I think it was 17, if I
remember correctly, different countries involved. I could be
wrong in the number. And Iran was there.
They came with their ship. Now the reports
are continuing to show that they showed up,
were part of this. And as I've showed
you before, Milan, I think, is the, acronym
that they historically are mostly unarmed, or rather
either unarmed or brings the amount needed to
expel what they're going to do if it's
an armed exercise.
And that's very common, actually. Now it's not
all the time. That's what I discussed last
time. But the reality of this was that
they this was under the guise of diplomacy.
This was a, you know, an exercise where
they're joining together, and this happens all the
time. And the US government shows up in
a submarine, basically, is parked but not really,
waits. And at the end of it, the
Iranian ship pulls out, and then on the
coast of Sri Lanka, they secretly go up
to them and shoot them and and take
the ship. Now as more reports come out
that it was unarmed, it makes it even
more alarming. Now there's main points to understand
that one, they've never declared war so far,
neither has Iran.
Neither have they allowance under the War Powers
Act because Trump himself said very clearly, I
attack first. There's no imminent threat. So there's
no approval from Congress. There's no authorization for
use of military force, and there's no War
Powers' allowance. So there is no legal reality
here no matter what their justification is. Right?
Even if it was an imminent response,
or I let's just say if it was
an imminent attack,
right now, technically, he would have those sixty
day period to continue to do what he's
doing and eventually have to verify that congress.
But he himself said it was not. He
said it was him attacking first, and the
claim of imminent has completely fallen down. And
they know that. That's why they're trying to
water it down with different things now. So
that being said, that means no matter what,
they were in this situation and there is
no legal reality where they could have bombed
them in international waters or not, armed or
not.
That would be considered an act of war,
and that would be illegal under the guise
under the con
under international law. So the war the on
top of it,
they didn't rescue the people after they attacked
them. They they they may sound crazy to
the uninformed about the international
legalities.
Whether or not you respect them or believe
they should be there, it is the current
reality if the US government does sign on
to it every year or ever just, you
know, being a part of the international community
and the UN and what they pretend they're
doing. And that means that they're required in
the Geneva Conventions to rescue people that after
engagement and if there's no risk, which there
was not, they did not. Many most of
them died. They left. Remember? Because what he
told hegseth told you, maximum lethality, hit punch
them while they're down. We don't want a
fair fight, Graham recently said. Right. So that
means you basically trick somebody, wait for them
to be unarmed, sneak up on them, and
fire them, then leave them all to die.
Because that's what honorable people do. Right? That's
what the the America first, you know, it's
it's insane.
In what world has that ever been what
we at least pretend we are? And so
whether they were armed was the least important
part.
Now it's coming out even more so that
they seem to have not been armed. Now
as it says here,
the Iranian ambassador, India, Mohammed Fatali, condemned the
attack and said the ship was unarmed. So
this is from the Iranian side. Now what
we have now is and, of course, we
question all of them. Just because Iranian does
not therefore mean dishonest, frankly, if you're gonna
look at it that way, it's far more
likely that our people are lying since that's
the most obvious track record, but neither side
should be assumed to be lying. It should
be considered.
Look at it, consider it, question it, look
at all the facts. Now what we have
is the
former Indian,
foreign minister, I believe, and he was on
the record. I think they have him tagged
right in here. He came out right away
and said this was unarmed and that these
people were it was a war crime or
just
a crime. Now that was the still, as
far as I could tell,
the Indian government, Modi, in particular, have yet
to really clarify, which would be the final
point. Now so that that was there. Now
there was a lot of dispute,
and fairly so.
Now we have the Iranian ambassador who's come
out and said, yes. It was unarmed. Of
course, they could be lying. But so now
what we have is two people who have
information and insight into the situation telling you
that it was unarmed.
And we have examples of these situations being
exactly that in the past. We have nobody
on the other side giving you anything other
than not that's not true. And here's what
you know? So it could be that they're
both lying, but it's the evidence suggests that
it was unarmed. And it says, we will
respond to this assassination very strongly. The ship
was unarmed. And remember, even if it was
armed, that was still a crime under international
law because of everything we just discussed. And
in a regular maneuver at sea, I think
The United States and the Zionist regime want
to disturb and destroy all the international law
and international norms. I agree with that. In
fact, I think that's exactly part of what
they're trying to accomplish.
Why? Because look at what Israel's done for
two years.
Literally, in spitting in the face of everything
they ever claimed they were fighting for. And
that's not to say that every other country
cared at all, but at least they pretended.
And maybe that's worse. I don't know. But
the point is Israel has continued to laugh
at it, to violate it, to sneer, to
do everything they're not supposed to do. You
know, murdering children, starvation, the whole damn thing.
So now if this becomes some casual dragging
the world into this different situation and Trump
displays all of this acting like it's normal,
And quite literally I mean, line to line
right now, guys. Human. She I mean, every
point you saw Israel do in Gaza's genocide
that's still going, you used to now see
Higgs, Seth, Trump, and the rest parroting those
same points. It's kinda like a mash between
the Iraq war narratives and Israel's Gaza Genocide
narratives. Well, so that then gives cover to
what they did. Right? They're gonna look, well,
well, okay. Well, if you're gonna go after
me, then go after Trump. Well, you know
what? I agree. But it's going to spread
this out.
So the fact that he said that should
matter and the fact that it was a
crime, when there every possible reality should matter.
And look. If you wanna go butter on
bad guy, you know what? You're probably right.
Prove it. Make your case. I wouldn't disagree
if you've got evidence. It still does not
change the legal reality of the situation.
That's what's so frustrating about this, is it's
kind of it's it's sort of it's like
the what aboutism, I guess, in a way
that they've always made fun of about the
left, but they're just doing the same thing,
but pivoting to something that doesn't even
they make the point invalid.
Right? I mean, it's it's just so frustrating
that it's it's like saying, well, they're bad
or they did bad things. Or, you know,
it's like saying that person bopped a grandma
on the head and they shouldn't be here.
Okay. Fine. That doesn't then invalidate their rights.
They're they're a disgusting human being. They have
to go to trial and they have to
prove the evidence. Right? No. Bad guy. Get
him
out of here. It's amazing.
The sinking of Dina seems to be part
of Higgs's new policy of ignoring, as he
said, stupid rules of engagement. I honestly can't
believe he said that. I mean, if there's
any any justice in this world, those exact
statements will be used as an absolute nail
final nail in the coffin to be like,
he just literally told you there was no
rules of engagement, that they were not going
to do the right thing, that they were
gonna punch them while they're down. I mean,
all of these things mean the opposite of
what these things are supposed to uphold.
And he says, and it raises questions of
what the Trump administration would say. Of course,
obviously, always the right question to ask what
they would say if a country
like Iran attacked an American ship exactly the
same way. Now Now they say if it
was unarmed, but either way, you take the
exact circumstances and you flip this around. What
do you think they would say? I mean,
look. This could be an ident like exactly
a a fair fight, a fair take. They
would still make it out to be terrorism
because they do every time, and you know
it. You're not dumb. Whether you're honest about
it or not, that's a different question. Every
one of you know what they do. We
all see it. Now the statesman, just to
make it so you can see it from
here, unarmed. They said commenting on the incident,
strategic affairs expert doctor Brahma,
Chanley raised questions about the nature of the
strike, arguing that if the ship was lightly
armed or unarmed,
and, quote, the strike looks less like combat
than premeditated
execution.
Like, it's pretty sad, guys, that this is
what they have to manufacture
to give themselves an illusion of some kind
of tact or rather
tactful, you know, some kind of strategic prowess.
Like, really?
Like, you're that much better than because you
snuck up and used the guise of diplomacy
on a possibly unarmed ship and sunk the
ship without even caring about
rescuing people that were there under the guise
of diplomacy?
You know what I mean? What are these
people there's videos all over. These people, you
know, yucking it up with the fellow people,
talking about what they had, their families, their
children, you know, and then they just murdered
everybody. You know? And look, it's it's anyway,
it's it's almost not even
the it's clearly not the right path to
try to speak humanity to some of these
people. I mean that seriously on all sides
of partisanship because the dehumanization has set in
so severely.
But they are people. They are human beings
with families and dreams and lives. But apparently,
if you listen to Hegseth and the rest,
well, they deserve to die. But simultaneously,
somehow, we're fighting for Iranians because that's not
embarrassingly stupid. Iran's ambassador to India, doctor Mohammed,
Fatali, also condemned the attack, claiming the vessel
was unarmed,
three people now, when it was torpedoed by
The US submarine.
Quote, we will well, actually, make sure that
was I thought that was the other guy.
No. I'm sorry. That's the same guy. So
continuing. We will re we will respond to
the assassination very strongly this ship. Oh, well,
well, that was the wrong.
Oh, you know what? I'm I'm sorry. I
just read the other article. I just I
forgot. This was just the second v.
Just to show you where it was written
in here. We will respond with the assassination
very strongly. The ship was unarmed in a
regular maneuver at sea.
So, you know, I mean, these things obviously
matter, guys. You You know what I mean?
Especially with what like, right now, you're finding
people in the Trump side screaming about them
using cluster munitions. So so wait a minute.
Are there rules or not? Oh, it only
applies to you except here's an example of
the US government buying cluster munitions from Israel,
like, thirty seconds ago. You know, it's it's
infuriating
that we have to be this dishonest.
Now on the school bombing, same exact conversation.
Here's what Trump just literally said. And by
the way, the fact that they asked Hegseth
behind him, you can clearly tell bothered him.
And they're just lying to you. Even Hegseth
pretended like it wasn't for like, Trump's like,
it was Iran. Right? Randy Fine, it was
Iran. Israel, it was Iran. Even Hegseth's like,
well, we're looking into it. I
think about that. Here's what he says.
United States bomb a girl's elementary school in
Southern Iran on the first day of the
war and kill a 175
people.
Based on what I've seen, that was done
by
Iran.
Is that true, mister Haksa? It was Iran
who did that. We're certainly investigating.
Still investigating. But the only the only side
that targets
civilians
is Iran.
We're not. Or literally provably by everybody. I
mean, I mean, it's just so funny we
even have to talk about that. Does anybody
anywhere actually think that makes sense? Anybody other
than people lying for the team no matter
what said?
Are we are we unaware of all the
hundreds of I mean, literally, if you do
the math of the war on terror, we're
talking about tens of millions of innocent people
that have been killed.
Look. There have been reports about that my
entire life. Look at it, guys. It's not
a secret. Like, from high level international entities
that have done mass research about all the
different locations of their war on terror bombings
every time in Iraq, every time in Syria,
every time in Somalia. I'm right now, I
could bring up 16 reports showing you of
Sudan, Somalia, 10 civilians killed with The US
bombing that they said were and here we
are.
I mean, really? It's just so crazy. And
the same thing Graham just said and the
rest of them, but we don't do that.
You do, though. So I mean, like,
every government is capable of doing that. That
should be the real way to frame this.
And it's embarrassing that anybody would claim that
you're morally superior above. We just wouldn't do
that.
It's just embarrassing.
We think it was done we think it
was done by Iran. I think it was
done by Iran. Because they're very inaccurate as
you know with their munitions.
That's why. Because they're inaccurate with the unit.
Okay. Well, seeing as hell that's the case,
or rather despite him saying that, like, it's
What is that?
What is that on my screen right there?
That's weird. But, you know, the the obvious
reality here, guys, is the evidence has already
been very clear. Near I mean, whether it's
the reportings from the New York Times, The
Wall Street Journal that just back up from
US intelligence in his administration literally telling you
that, or all of the evidence, by the
way, that also literally shows you that. And
so here,
on top of that,
Iran has released a video, which you should
question,
of the strike on the girl's school. A
US Tomahawk missile is clearly visible.
Debunking The US blatant lie, They're also struck
the same school forty minutes later to murder
those involved in the rescue effort. Doesn't that
sound familiar?
Guess that was just a double accident. Right?
And you I you I check this. Like,
I do everything I talk about. The the
the AI thing says that it doesn't it's
not AI, which doesn't appear to be. The
image does show that it's been roundly shared,
and it does tie back. I mean, it's
just
pretty clear. And that even if this wasn't
there, on top of everything else, we already
have the evidence.
I mean, Hegseth literally posted the the bombing
map,
and a journalist in the in the press
gaggle pointed like, pinpointed on the map. And
I checked. It is correct. And it's right
in the red spot of HEGSETH's own bombing
map. You know? And then and you got
an Israeli guy that comes out and goes,
no. It's it was The US. Don't even
blame us. Literally shoving the blame onto them
even though it was probably Israel in the
first place, if you really want I mean,
you know, I don't I have no
no.
I mean, I would never claim that the
US government would not target or that I
would I would argue that they would do
it deliberately if it wasn't their address. 100%.
But Israel
seems to do it by design. Like like
that and, like The US, if it was
somehow gonna gain them something, even though I
don't think they care. Like, it's more benign.
It's more like sociopathic, where Israel is more
psychopathic. It's more about making, punishing, hurting, Amalek,
destroy them all. And so I my mindset
is this most likely this was something that
was designed by what they've done. Look at
what they did in Gaza. Look at what
they're doing everywhere.
But you can decide for yourself.
And so they're just telling you, looks like
it was Iran.
Here's my show if you wanna listen to
what we discussed on the twenty eighth, which
I thought it was definitive at that point.
We have William Darr Maple posting this about
CPAC, and the head of CPAC says Iranian
school goals are school girls are better dead
than in a burqa. And that's exactly how
he said it. The point ultimately is when
asked about it, right, saying that, you know,
well, those girls are dead. Like, basically saying
that women in Iran are, you know, burqas,
which remember, guys, that's not the real picture
the way they frame that. I've talked to
many people who have traveled through Iran.
Robert, for example, has very very good context
and insight. I've interviewed Brian, I forget his
last name, who literally backpacked through there, and
he's just a random guy. Is I mean,
it and the evidence, the same every single
time. I mean, right now, you can look
up contacts and or rather, accounts in Iran,
which you should question. I agree. But they
will I mean, wandering around Iran in normal
western looking clothes and without a hijab. And
yet in some places,
they do have them and are more strict.
But guess what? That exists in Israel too.
As I've shown you a thousand times, Orthodox
Jewish women in many of the more Orthodox
locations,
like Zionists more so than anything, are forced
to wear head coverings.
Why is that not why it's okay one,
not the other? I guess only when they're
brown.
I mean, it's just embarrassing. So the point
about all that is to lie about it
relentlessly, like the nukes, like everything else they
lie about. And I'm not even saying that
there's not there's points that I would criticize
around the way it's forced, but not everywhere.
It's not a ubiquitous enforcement. It's more specific
to certain areas. But
that's for the Iranians to decide. And as
Robert points out relentlessly,
and I mean, in a good way,
that they have shown over the years that
Iranians are literally
with their protest, not when The US gets
involved,
you see change. You see them literally have
changed through their government. It changes the way
that things happen in their lives. Amazing how
that works. Now I wouldn't even argue that
means that they're on their side. I think
governments are playing games with everybody. But look
at what we deal with. When's the last
time you had any real material change outside
of narratives and wedge issues and screaming back
and forth and then removing things back and
forth?
We're so obviously manipulating this country. So the
point was, well, they have burkas, they're forced
to wear them, and then the point was,
well, they're dead, man. Those chill those girls
are dead. And, essentially, well, if they were
alive, they'd be in burkas.
That's what he said.
So really? Like, so it's more important? Like,
so basically, he didn't say it, but that's
what the insinuation was.
He this is a radical, guys. That's what
a extremist looks like. The kind of person
who would rationalize the death the death of
children because they might be in a position
that I think is wrong, like, a religious
or political,
dynamic that I disagree
with. Like, what if they disagree with you?
Does that matter?
Not to these people.
Now here is Bolton
trying to tell you, I don't even know
why this guy's even involved in the conversation
anymore. He should be in prison,
telling you that
it's their fault for bombing the school because
the school is too close. And then I'll
make the same point I made, and even
Twitter called it out.
Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't show the
oh, that's weird. That shouldn't have gone down,
actually.
I don't think I showed you anything. Hold
on me.
I don't think I I think this was
all I missed. Right? Or all you missed.
Let me know if there was another tab
or something I showed. No. I think that
was it. So there's the post anyway. So
here here is what I'll show you next.
And this is Bolton, like I said.
But also reports that military investigators believe it
is likely US forces
were responsible for an apparent strike on an
Iranian
girl's school that killed scores of children
on Saturday.
If that was The United States, can that
be justified?
I don't think The United States,
in any conceivable
circumstance, would directly target,
a civilian
structure like that. You know, aside from the
100,000 times I can prove it happened, though.
But aside from those?
If in fact it was an American weapon
that did it, it was because the weapon
malfunctioned, I'm sure we will try and make
recompense.
And my advice,
to the Iranian Wasn't that a convenient or,
you know, well, could it malfunctioned?
Right? Well, they seem to malfunction half the
time. That that's pretty interesting.
Is in the future and anybody else is
don't build girls' schools right next to to
naval bases.
Okay. Well, let's address that.
You know, it's what's really important to understand
is that Bolton knows what he just did
right there. Right? He knows very clearly because
this is basic, basic stuff.
And I showed you reports. I showed you
math. I could show you plenty of things
to prove the same point on the last
two shows, I think. Here's what Matty said.
There are over a 160 public schools situated
on a military basis across The United States.
Same I didn't know it was under 60,
but at the same point I made. Does
John Bolton, the warmongering war criminal, think these
are legitimate military targets now? Well, based on
his logic, apparently so. Or at least that
it'd be like, well, they shouldn't have been
there. Kind of their fault.
That foreign enemies are justified in killing US
kids in a school on a US military
base. I mean, there there's very important points
to be discussed around that most people don't
seem to know. The reality that not every
even like, this is what we were just
discussing today, which I think is gonna be
lost on most people that are all rah
rah war right now, which is that even
in some cases, targets that are appear military
would not be based on circumstances.
Or like with the ships, for example, we
discussed or
politicians versus military personnel. They don't even distinguish
right now. They're assassinating everybody. They're telling you
to bomb the next person that gets put
in place under Khomeini. That's what Israel just
said. Even though Trump's been telling you they're
gonna support the guy, if he ends up
not being bad, Israel's like, no. Whoever it
is, we're bombing him right now. They just
said that.
That's a that that's not a military person.
That's enough. That this is how they play
this game. Now
has
well, the reality being, you could point out
very clearly that The United States and Israel
have been doing that as far as I've
ever been around ever. They just go terrorist,
bad guy. But same point, I wouldn't be
surprised if Iran does something that's similar. I
just that's not an example that I could
point to, but I wouldn't be surprised. And
so the reality ends up being that if
this is where we are today, it's quite
obvious that the US government, and that's what
I was saying earlier about dragging the world
into this situation,
has
driven it to this point, where you now
have them rationalizing
in many cases, like we discussed about that
hotel bombing a a location that they know
there are personnel in, but there's also civilians.
So based on Israel's logic, that makes it
a military target, but not when Iran does
it. That's what the point was, but I
would still call that a crime because they
knew there were civilians there. See how easy
that is? And so the reality ends up
being that they pushed them into this position
because I've never seen them doing this before
after The US driving it, but it could
have happened that I haven't seen. It's the
same point every single time. And so even
Twitter
says the DOD confirms they operate 161
schools in nine districts across foreign countries,
US states, territories.
And there's John Bolton telling you that's bad
news because they're liars, guys. These are bad
people.
And I don't even know
I'm sorry that I have to tell you
this because this is just a graphic thing
to put in your mind, but it is
the reality.
Quote, more than half the victims could not
be identified through DNA testing due to the
scale of the tragedy.
Iran's UN invoice,
Arvani,
calls the deadly school strike a war crime
as polls show 56% of Americans oppose military
action.
Donald Trump so badly obliterated the bodies of
the little girls he bombed in Iran that
more than half of them couldn't be identified.
Now the other story that I think is
important, like I said, is the idea of
the conscientious objector and what's happening with this
country.
Now the cradle reported on
the seventh.
US troops reportedly seeking ways to avoid taking
part in US Israel War on Iran.
Now the prominent act, antiwar activist says a
growing number of US soldiers and their families
are contacting his organization.
Now this is the Center on Conscience
and War, which was briefly censored by Twitter.
And you know why. I don't even need
to get into it because there was no
discernible reason, and they were forced to bring
them back because everybody
screamed about it. But they censored them in
the midst of this conversation because they're going,
you don't need to go to war. Here's
the paperwork. And Elon jumped in and shut
that down.
Literally, what happened? Aside from it being maybe
Elon or somebody else, the Twitter platform shut
it down.
Hashtag free speech.
And it says and then Mike Preisner, executive
director of the Center on on Conscience and
War,
said in a post on Twitter that his
office had been overwhelmed with requests for guidance
from service members seeking to dodge deployment.
Quote, phone has been ringing off the hook,
he wrote, adding that many troops had been
not told had been told the mission involved
combat until the hadn't been told and had
involved combat to the last moment and were
initial initially informed they were heading to training.
Preisner said he spoke with the mother of
a soldier who was allowed to find,
one final call home before he turned his
phone in ahead of deployment. What was that?
What are we talking about?
According to an activist, the soldier told his
mother his unit would be going boots on
the ground that night. That was in the
sixth. And claimed his commander said the operation
was meant to bring about the second coming
of Christ. All of this, we verified,
aside from what location he might be going
to, the reality of
the religious war. There was apparently a 110
different reports, at least last I checked, from,
what, 30 different units? If if I might
be misremembering that number, I think that's even
more.
All saying that they're being told this is
to bring on Armageddon.
I don't know why this is not I
mean, how is the world? Is this not
in the mainstream media? You know why, guys.
You know why. This is a huge story,
and it would be unbelievably
the whole world would be screaming about this
if it came out through the corporate media
that Israel or rather whatever the driving force
is that the US government is telling their
personnel that they're fighting for Armageddon.
And yet nobody talks about that outside independent
media? You know why? You know, I don't
even need to say it out loud. I'm
not talking about Jewish people. We're talking about
the reality of control over the conversation that
comes from a foreign government.
And old and and look. Just to cut
to the chase because this is similar to
what I'm gonna show you next is directly
from the source.
This is what Mike Preisser put out.
Now he said, this is directly from his
post. I just spoke with the with the
and remember, he's the executive director of Center
on Conscious War. He's been at he works
with Abby Martin. I believe, at least at
one point, I don't know if it's still
the reality, but he was the partner of
Abby Martin and filmmaker of Empire Files and
has been an activist and he was a
veteran, has been activist for a long time.
I just spoke with the mother of a
service member in this unit. They were given
one last call home
before turning their phones in, which I'm not
even sure. Is that how that works? You
don't get your phone? I don't remember that
ever being the case as far as I've
seen. So it seems like they're controlling the
flow of information, which is crazy to me.
He told his mom they were going boots
on the ground tonight. Now he said he
also told his that his commander said that
they were doing this to bring about the
second coming of Christ. Now of all this,
that's the most obviously verified.
Hundreds of reports about that going to people
complaining, saying, This is
crazy. Like complaining, like filing literal on the
record complaints, many most of them anonymous saying
that they're being told this and it's alarming
to them.
He says, I can also confirm that he
did not tell them that this was a
combat deployment
until it was too late.
Everyone was told they were going to training.
Think about this with the conversation of what
we're being told about fighting for the per
for America first and fighting for the troops,
and you're tricking them.
Now it's not like they they could just
tell them, and you're forced and you have
to go anyway, but you realize, why would
they do that? Why would the phones be
taken?
In my opinion, if this is all accurate,
because they know people don't want this, and
this is what we need to understand. All
the screaming going, everyone's 90% of Republicans support
that. This is a drowningly desperate effort that
everyone sees, and most Americans I mean, look.
You can go back as far as you
wanna look. Every war I've ever seen, most
of Americans don't want war. And yet we're
to believe now, suddenly, the one thing that
they all didn't want, now they all support.
Guys, we are being gaslit to a degree
I've never seen, and we all know where
it's coming from.
Even Republicans know where it's coming from right
now more than ever.
So tricking people. He says, not saying this
is this confirms The US is invading, which
is different than just having boots. Right? Because
they have all sorts like I said, every
which way you can look at it, guys.
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria. Even when Trump said they
were gone, I proved to you that they
still had people in Afghanistan.
Just that at least one soldier told their
parent that this was
about this before losing all communication. He says,
I was part of the buildup in of
two evasion in Iraq. What I've heard today
from troops and families is so reminiscent
of February, 03/00/2003.
Doesn't prove The US is invading, but that
they are definitely preparing to. And we all
I mean, is it really even that hard
to wrap your mind around? Trump says it
won't happen? He said a lot of things
and most of them ended up being the
opposite of what he said. Pretty common from
my perspective, left or right. But let's acknowledge
that. And here we are where he says
no boots on the ground. Guess what? They
already said they might be boots on the
ground. Trump said that might have to happen.
No more forever wars, but, you know, we
have to fight forever sometimes. Okay.
It's just might have to be a it's
a limited targeted strike. Oh, guess what? It
might go it's just too embarrassing how many
times they do that seconds later, and we
keep getting the narrative. Probably weighing many factors,
and our resistance is one of them.
So here's what I wrote just in and
we're either just I just brought it up
that people see in my audience saying that
this is what's happening. Right? That people should
see this, that they don't wanna fight
Iran for Israel.
And then a follow-up from Mike,
his account or his platform or rather his,
he's the executive director of Center on Conscious
and War
suspended from Twitter.
They just suspended
this for informing service members of their legal
rights.
Now it came back
the next day, I believe, or but this
was
the seventh, and I believe no. I think
it was later that day. I saw that
it kinda it was actually Orwell that shared
it right here. They're back up. So we
have no. No. This was today.
So twenty four hours later, after everybody screamed
and obviously called it out, they brought it
back. Why? Well, apparently, we don't know because
they're cowards.
The truth is, I think we can all
see that somebody out there, I'm sure you
could guess who might be driving that reality,
that's probably two likely culprits,
don't want people to know that they can
say no.
Sort of like they don't want you to
know about jury nullification or any number of
things that actually give people power over the
government. Wonder why. And so they censored this.
Hashtag free speech, Elon. Right? Saving free speech
unless it challenges Israel's agenda.
So I think this is monumentally important because
it demonstrates
where we're at, that most people don't and
we're gonna get far more into this, that
most people in this country are very unhappy
with this what's happening, and I think we
can prove that. And I think the government
is drowning in that because
we are coming to a point where we
can see clearly the line between what they
want us to think and what they're actually
doing. And then when we stand back and
look at that, it's very easy to see
who is driving that agenda.
And it's not America first, guys. I'll tell
you that right now.
Now as Mark Ames points out, it's cliche
by now to point out what a complete
fraud Elon was with his k, with his,
discussion about free speech, lapped up by so
many fawning hacks.
Instead, we're getting a cent censorship on a
scale we've never imagined as the Israel backed
Trump regime war degenerates.
Now I agree with that entirely. We've just
had such a long gap between whatever we
thought was happening under Jack, whatever that really
was,
to now.
Now if we actually had some way to,
like, tap back into that, yeah, there was
clearly censorship. But, guys, it has never been
like what I'm seeing now.
I've I've said that for a long time.
Like, it for and from my perspective, the
suppression and it's not all just blatant sent
blatant,
blanket censorship.
It's algorithmic manipulation and censorship and control to
a degree I've never seen. Add Israeli bots,
set,
autentics, which we'll get into in a second.
It's obvious.
Oh, that was just redundant. I think I
actually
grabbed that twice.
So here is another veteran. Same conversation speaking
about this exact point and trying to make
sure people know that now is the time
to stand up if you care about your
integrity principles. Right? What you your honor, what
you actually thought you were fighting for.
Today, one of our members received a message
offering a $30,000
bonus to come back in.
Yeah. And that's obvious too. Right? That's not
what you do when you're spending billions on
war when you have enough people to fight.
So we here, we need to get the
message out to all those who are not
yet deployed.
Now is the time to resist.
If you joined up for values of honor,
courage, and commitment,
if you joined up to defend your communities,
now is the time to defend your communities
by refusing
this illegal and immoral war.
I mean,
there's narrative.
Sure. Plenty of,
you know, coined token responses they're supposed to
say when people tell you it's illegal,
but it's obvious. I mean, if you can
pretend you can, you know, play the Nuance
game and act like this, you know, but
they haven't done it in however many years.
It's still
obvious. I mean, you can literally ask Grok
point blank and they'll say, Yep. That's illegal.
Not like that proves it and shouldn't because
Grok gets manipulated and lies all the time
and gets things wrong. But it's a platform
that is manipulated by somebody who's trying to
lie for your side and it still tells
you that this is illegal objectively.
You know, that's the weird thing about all
this. It's just there's this weird pocket of
just narrative screaming lies that seem to have
a lot of influence because they're all, like,
10,000,000,000
influencer counts, but it's it's like a fraction
of the people of the conversation. It's incredible.
And I think that's how this has been
set up, to get this loud vocal screaming
thing that they pretend is the entire conversation
when it's very clearly not, and then just
kind of algorithmically box things out. I think
this is obvious right now.
I think it's clear that people are in
droves
starting to change sides about this, sides from
just, you know,
like,
supporting what all of our government's doing or
not.
Now here is the same account, center on
conscious and war,
saying you can preemptively
register as a conscientious objector if you are
worried about being drafted.
To do so, you register for the service
select service and write I am a CO
when you do so. But when you do
so, for extra protection, you can also do
the CEO application
and send it to us to keep on
file for you because I'm pretty sure that
this government wouldn't care. Now here's what's funny
to me. Unfortunately, I don't know if he
knew who he was sharing or not, but
this is the ridiculous clown Stu Peters who
quoted them of saying Trump might institute a
draft when they literally didn't say that. But
she said the usual statement, which is we
don't count anything out, and it's possible.
Very different. Is it not? Now I agree.
It's obviously might, but that's not what they
said. And using quotes, it gives a very
clear impression. Typical Stu Peters nonsense. To try
to trick people into thinking that that's something
that's a bombshell, when you listen to it,
they simply go, well, we might. We have
but it's possible. We won't cut anything out.
And when they do that, that's fifty fifty
as far as I'm concerned. Might, might not,
depends on the reality.
But I want you to hear not from
Stu Peters lying about it, but the reality
that that she's saying that a draft is
on the table. It's possible. It might happen,
which it always has been. It's never gone
away. But that they're even talking about it
says something.
Candace Owens
adds an interesting,
angle to this or rather just a, you
know, point to bring into it as what
she said got a weird response
or rather the obviously just or rather expected
response from the people we're talking about.
So she wrote, do not join or remain
in The United States Military.
Trump has betrayed America and expects you to
die for Israel. Remember remember keep keep telling
us out there that not everyone sees this
and all these from Maeve Smith and Tucker
and Candace and every the entirety of the
real Charlie Kirk audience. Like, you guys we
we see you.
So there is no honor in being led
by dishonorable men to your death. Well said.
Now, this person says, yes. It is effing
illegal.
Illegal. What about free speech again, guys? What
about what's going on? Candace Owens just publicly
broadcasted this cancer across x.
This cancer, her her opinion about not joining
a illegitimate situation. Now you could be she
could be wrong. Right? But when did it
start happening where your opinion, if disagreeing with
one side, was suddenly well, I think right
around 2016 forward. Not even remotely implying Trump
alone. But that was an interesting spin where
all of a sudden, we just got in
this crazy the other side was no longer
the difference of opinion. It was the terrorist
enemy that we have to fight. Because they
always had designed to turn this back in.
In fact, it was always pointed at us
when you understand it. But now it's just
on its face. We the domestic terrorism focus,
the whole thing. They're telling you it's illegal
to say,
don't join the military because bad.
No, it's not. I mean, just because they
wanna go, you can't say this out loud,
that's the kind of authoritarian thing we're all
fighting. Right? They could just deem you can't
wear this color shirt because I don't like
it that day. Well, that's where we're going.
The military is a problem, and it's because
what they're doing is illegal. And if you
can't handle that being pointed out, then I
understand where I know where you're coming from
in a sense of where it's driving you.
And Bill Ackman repost this.
And she says, since Bill Ackman is retweeting
that it is against the law for me
to tell Americans not to sign up for
the military, I would like to publicly invite
him onto my podcast, which he won't do,
to offer a convincing argument as to why
Americans should send their children to die for
Israel. We can't pick up we can pick
up where Charlie Kirk left off.
Now I I I honestly, I didn't even
look into whether or not it's on the
book somewhere illegal for you to say that
because I don't care whether it is or
not because that's insane to me. The idea
that the a in a in a a
violence,
you know, a violent focused force is gonna
say that you're not allowed to criticize our
violence, otherwise, we'll we'll put you in a
cell.
It's, like, it's insane, guys. Free speech, like
everything else we talk about, before we ever
got to this point, shall not be infringed.
There is no point at which they can
go, except if you say the thing about
us that we don't like. That's not how
that works, whether government, military, or anything.
We just gotta get back to basics, guys.
Fire in a theater, the whole thing. Throw
it all back. It's back to the core
point. You can say whatever you want, whenever
you want, no matter what. That's called free
speech.
I mean, look. I'm open to a conversation
about people that wanna disagree. I even understand,
like I said, about the logic of fire
in a theater and the whole thing. But
I see how it's been abused ever since.
My point is that should be the fault
of the people that decide to irrationally act
based on some random person screaming something. End
of the day, this is them trying to
stop you from being able to talk about
what's going on as an American in a
place, on a platform, all of which they
tell you is free speech. Oh, free speech,
Biden for freedom, but shut up because you're
gonna go to jail.
You gotta love how crazy this is right
now in an entertaining sense even though it's
so terrifying.
So she says, Zionists are having a meltdown
about what I said yesterday. So let me
reiterate.
Do not sign up for or for or
continue to fight for the US military. Now
here's an interesting additional point, and I would
still I stand a 100% by what I
said. No matter what she says. Seriously.
Because that's the point, free speech. And we
have a right to criticize.
Actions are different. Actions are where if she
was out there physically trying to do something,
it broke the law. Well, you could argue
that's a crime.
My point is, from their perspective, you could
start to break a nuance to say, well,
now she's saying,
if you're
already committed,
no longer fight.
I still stand by what I said, but
I argue they're gonna make a bigger case
about her trying to convince standing military personnel
to with to ignore their commitments and their
oaths.
You see my point? That's interesting. But she
could but I still it doesn't matter. Still
free speech. This war is on behalf of
satanic pedophiles. She writes, find the legal means
to exit the military. Do not fight for
child rapists. Now it sees things like that
whether you agree with that or not. It's
a crazy statement, which I'm not saying doesn't
exist. What I'm saying is that's a very
broad statement about the war is on behalf
of I mean,
to me, that's the kind of thing that's
an Alice Jones level thing. Whether true or
not, in some sense, it's used in order
to make it look crazy or made made
broad in order to make it ignorable by
people who would otherwise be interested.
Not you you may think I'm crazy and
disagree.
I'm just saying, I think that's interesting that
that's a statement you would make. Sure. That
exists.
Clearly. If you don't if you I mean,
are there pedophiles? Yes. Are there people that
believe in Satanism? Yes. 100%. Are there people
that practice both? Clearly.
Are they under government in some cases? I
would argue I can see that. The point
is, is it the vast majority?
You could decide. I don't think so.
I think there's a level of this that
has a play you know, but you have
to understand that this is something that is
used to get the average person. You might
be beginning to understand, like, the basics of
this. You know, the illegalities of the
war and the fact that the war was
done illegally, and you jump to satanic pedophiles,
they're gonna go, woah. Okay. I'm I'm you're
I'm gonna ignore from on from now on
all the important things she might say.
Think about that for a second. Daniel says,
here's where you go, so good for him.
Stand by this, guys. They have a right
to point this out, and military have a
right to know their rights.
Now in Israel, same point.
Heretz, I protested the Iran war.
Israeli police beat, arrested, and strip searched me,
says this Jewish person in Israel. Because it's
all about Zionism, guys, and you're not allowed
to stand up against the Zionism wars.
You can read it for yourself. It's no
different. This is not new either, but people
just pretend they don't know what's going on
in these countries.
Now here's a clip I'll play just a
couple quick parts of in the beginning, really,
from John,
Mersheimer telling you, there's no question a nuclear
armed Iran would bring stability to the region.
Interesting point. Even though I I obviously, there's
logic to it. The way he frames it,
I find interesting because it's this is an
older clip because it's I'll just tell you
right now what he says is that nuclear
weapons are actually a peace tool
from because of deterrence. And it's like, okay.
Well,
maybe that's changing today or is because of
their clear direction of tactical nukes and Trump's
effort to make them usable, which blows my
mind. I've been saying that
tactical nukes and Trump's effort to make them
usable, which blows my mind. I've been saying
that for since his first administration. He's the
one that drove that forward, guys.
But overall, maybe even before that, you could
argue there is some logic there. Right? That
that was the way they were designed, at
least how after the fact. Is it well,
it's about deterrents, and we have them. Nobody
wants to use them. So if we have
them okay. That's a that's a there's a
point there.
I just don't agree with their I mean,
with people like the extremist Zionist religious cult
that we can see driving this,
I I think that that changes the conversation
about that. Right? But nonetheless, hear what he
had to say.
I think there's no question that, a nuclear
armed Iran would bring stability to the region
because nuclear weapons
are weapons of peace.
They're web
Okay. Right. That was what it was. Weapons
of peace. That's a little bit far from
me. Right? Like, the idea weapons of peace,
but they're destructive.
But I get what he's saying, though. I
just think that's important to think about. Like,
maybe use a different word. You know? But
at the end of the day, it could
ultimately if there was no irrational lunatics out
there, and that's pretty much the groups that
were claimed to be fighting for freedom out
there,
that this might make sense.
Defensive deterrents. They have hardly any offensive capability
at all. And if Iran had Sorry. One
more stop. Is that's that's the I think
that was the main point, is that the
logic is, well, there is no offensive purpose
because once you use it, then not only
is that gonna set off a a response
that causes more chaos, like nuclear style, but
that it's so widely devastating
and just there's no real, like, tactical use.
It's just like a massive destruction point that
then, like, that that ends up being that
there is real no offensive use. It's really
just holding them as a deterrent for other
use.
So there like I said, there's logic there,
but same point.
A nuclear deterrent,
there's no way that The United States
or Israel for that matter would be threatening
to attack Iran now. In the same way
that if Saddam had had nuclear weapons in
2003,
The United States would not have invaded
Iraq. And if Libya had nuclear weapons in
2011,
The United States would not have gone to
war against Libya.
So I think that if you had a
Middle East where
other states besides Israel, and this, of course,
includes Iran, had a nuclear deterrent, it would
be a more peaceful region.
Well, it's possible there'll be some proliferation.
I wouldn't bet against the fact that maybe
Turkey or Saudi Arabia would acquire nuclear weapons,
but people have been predicting
widespread proliferation
for decades now, and it's never happened. But
I think there are two reasons that it
wouldn't happen.
One is that the Iranians would not be
able to blackmail anybody in the neighborhood with
their nuclear weapons. We've created this myth in
this country over the past few years in
talking about Iran that any country that acquires
nuclear weapons can blackmail other countries or use
those nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
We have a lot of theory and a
huge amount of empirical evidence,
sixty seven years now, which show that no
country with nuclear weapons can blackmail
another country as long as somebody is protecting
that country or it has its own nuclear
weapons. Right. I mean, that's a fair point.
You know, this is the thing we make
talk about. Like like, I think it was,
was it Tucker? Tucker made the point on
Pierce about the Shiite attacks. Zero. Right?
We'll get whatever you wanna claim, and then
you could be still be right. They they're
just they're evil, and we just because of
this and that, that hasn't been allowed to
happen. Okay. Possible. It's also just as likely
or possible that you're wrong and that the
reality he said was right. So the point
is that we have this body of evidence,
say, 67
where, well, that hasn't happened. Nobody had. And
and there are some lunatics out there. Or
even the idea of that lone crazy man
who might build one somewhere and use it
or some terrorist in the tunnel might build
one somewhere. Okay. Possible. Right? Okay. Adding to
the point as always, I know people out
there want me to say this, and I
don't disagree that it's possible, that there's an
argument that nuclear weapons don't exist or that
the power is not what they claim it
is. It's always worth considering that.
I I don't agree with that. I think
the evidence leans the other way, but it's
worth considering.
The point being
that where nothing's happened. There hasn't been any
any you know, not not in the sense
that he's discussing.
So doesn't that mean more than screaming rhetoric
from people that we've seen lie, like, like,
the press conference right before that in every
everything they've ever said in my entire life?
I'm being hyperbolic on purpose, but, clearly, they
lie a lot. You know? Like, that has
to matter. Like, that seems to be empirical
evidence, like he said. We gotta get away
from listening to politicians in any sense.
And this leads to the second reason. The
United States is gonna extend its nuclear umbrella
over Saudi Arabia and over Turkey the way
it extended it over Germany and Japan during
the Cold War, and we will make it
perfectly clear to the Iranians that they cannot
blackmail anybody. And by the way, to clarify
what I said there, obviously, what I mean
is, like, you know, listen, consider what they're
saying. Like, consider everything from anybody, question it
all. Right? But what I mean is people
who are taking what politicians say as gospel.
Right? Like, Trump says it, therefore, that's the
reality. I don't know why anybody has ever
gotten there even if you believe everything he's
saying is true. He could be wrong. He
could be misled. It's always the same
point. So there'll be no great incentive for
Turkey or,
for, Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons. And
as you know, when you're involved in contact
sports,
it can be very dangerous. And, so they
live in a dangerous world.
And on top of that, nuclear weapons are
the ultimate deterrent.
Right? It doesn't get any better than nuclear
weapons.
And, of course, this is why states pursue
nuclear weapons.
I believe that if Iran
had nuclear weapons, The United States and Israel
would not be threatening to attack Iran.
You don't you don't attack a This is
the point that we're making the entire time.
In fact, not just that that that itself
makes the point, but look at the rest
of their actions. Like, in every way, it
shows that they wouldn't do this. If they
had them,
they would be acting differently. Right? The fact
is and and that's why all the evidence
needs to be there almost there, and they're
building that. Because if they did, they wouldn't
even be attacking.
Right? So in in and of itself, when
you break it down and I I made
this in much better, you know,
fleshed out database arguments. I'm just backing up
what he said. And I think the show
before last, I think, was the one just
about the reality of that. And I had,
like, three different points we made about how
look at what they just did, Brett. Look
at what they said. And it clearly shows
that ultimately they're aware that that's not they
but they need the argument that it's there
to justify the attack, but the attack's only
happening because they actually know that they're not.
And that's backed up by Gabbard. It's backed
up by the previous defense. It's backed up
by intelligence general. It's backed up by the
IEA. It's backed up by the International Atomic
Energy Agency, by all of them.
Apparently apparently, Witkoff saying things out loud is
enough to get people to ignore all the
evidence because just like I said, that's how
a lot of partisanship works.
Country
that has nuclear weapons
and put its survival at risk.
So I think if Iran were to get
nuclear weapons,
The United States and and Israel would back
off and stop threatening them.
Then there's always the case of, Libya. You
remember colonel Gaddafi?
We told colonel Gaddafi that if he gave
up his nuclear weapons program, his weapons of
mass destruction programs, that we would leave him
alone. Mhmm.
You know what happened to colonel Gaddafi. He's
now six feet under, and we helped put
him six feet under. In case you don't
remember, the point is that they he complied.
Right?
And then they killed him.
It's quite simple. And then that's why we
point it in the past when they go
when they I I don't even know I
I don't know if they thought this was
smart or that it was just clumsy politics,
but they said, we'll talk about give them
the Libya model.
Now it could be taken as a threat.
I think that probably was what the point
was, but that didn't make sense with the
idea that they wanted this to happen. Maybe
they never did. At the end of the
day, the Libyan model is trick them into
getting rid of them and then kill them.
That's a lesson for everybody in the world,
whether bad guy or not. You you do
what they say? Well, the real point is
whether about nuclear weapons or not. Like, US
government has roundly shown throughout its own history
that it does not hold anything sacred, like
in a broad sense, administration to administration. They
will sabotage, will backstab, they will ignore UN
resolutions, agreements, treaties, everything as long as it's
in their interest. They'll just go, wow. Bad
thing. Terrorists. We don't agree. They broke it.
Whatever. And just move forward. They've done it
my entire life. So is Israel. Right now,
they're violating, like, many different UN resolutions while
they often point to them to just to
to claim Iran this or that or they
should have followed this one. It's just hypocritical
across the board. I mean, there's more to
play, but I'll leave it there.
So into the conversation of the great reset,
Lindsey Graham, Trump, republican style.
The point of those is just to, you
know I mean,
the reality of where we are, I just
think is we're I'm actually gonna hope it
will if we might not get to it
today depending on time, but the end part
I had today was a bunch of just
stuff that you can't like, just the the
compilations of the contradictions.
I've just it's very, very hard to ignore
right now.
This is Lindsey Graham seemingly coming out and
saying that, you know, I don't know. You
wanna call the quiet part out loud. Just
in regard to what the Trump administration, rather
specifically Trump, has been promising his own people
from 2024,
everything he's talking about here contradicts all of
that, or rather all of every point here
contradicts things he said in that conversation.
And yet people go, yay. You know? Shield
of America. Let's make a new forever war
against South America, which is already starting. We'll
tell you show you in a second. And
all the people that said no forever wars,
no war regime change, no war with Iran,
are like, yay. War with Iran. Regime change.
Go after South America forever.
I mean, it's
and look for
yourself. It's pretty crazy, and that's why I
really want you to think right there. It's
like, okay. Well, that's that can't exist in
an organic scenario. So that means this weird
fake conversation,
which all of them know we're seeing them
do that, because look at the comments. It's
like every other comment. It's like, you're ridiculous.
This is you now. The you know, that
whole that this you account where it shows
this what you said then, this is what
you're saying now. It's all over the place,
and they just keep doing it. So that
means this is about an illusion of what's
happening. I don't even think those people care
truly about anything they're saying. Here's Lindsey Graham
telling you that all of this, everything we're
discussing,
is about resetting the world or at least
that that's what Trump's doing. And you know
I believe that's what's happening to a very
real degree. And the great reset is one
element of all of this. The network state
agenda, the freedom cities conversations, CEO run countries,
like, all of this, even the international law
point, the Palantir surveillance, everything they're doing, changing
the dynamics of international law, changing our our
relationship with the constitution,
All of this is dragging us into this
new scenario. Donald Trump's new WHO proposal, his
new board of peace, a global dynamic is,
as the UN called it, a security council
adjacent entity.
These are globalist talks, guys. That's what those
are. He introduced it at the UN. He
introduced it at the Davos meeting. Those are
both globalist discussions.
Think about how stupid this is for people
like Jones to act like this is not
exactly what is happening.
My name's Lindsey Graham. Straight up telling you
that. Not looking for a fair fight. If
we get in a fight, I wanna win
it. I wanna win it quick. Okay. Just
to start out with that ridiculous point because
it seems that too is what they're trying
to change. Right? Apparently, it's somehow not weak
to care about honor and integrity
because bad guy Iran?
It doesn't matter what the other side is.
It's about you that matters. Right? It doesn't
matter whether they're the worst terrorist in the
world. What you do matters about who you
are. So to claim they're bad, we do
it too, means you're just as bad as
them. I've said that a thousand times of
doing this.
Just like Hegseth. We don't wanna fair or
rather,
punch them while they're down. These are all
very clear sentiments. It means you're a coward.
It means you are a manipulator. It means
you don't hold anything sacred. It means you
don't have any respect for anybody.
To say you don't want a fair fight,
I mean, that's that in another way of
saying that means we'll break the law. Right?
I mean, it's crazy that you have people
out there going, yeah. Yeah. Get them. Tell
them. You know, f around and find out.
Like, these are children in the conversation, and
and they seem to be the ones getting
all, you know, like, literally being lifted up
into this so the world one thinks we're
all that stupid and that these people get
the illusion of somehow support.
I just flatly do not think this country
is as dumb as they believe it is
or they want you to think it is.
Not looking for a fair fight. If we
get in a fight, I wanna win it.
I wanna win it quick. I'm in my
I'm sorry. One more thing on that too.
That means that you so you're weak. Right?
So if somebody is strong, who has the
best military in the world, has no sense,
you know, worry about Iran, that would let's
stand up. Step in the ring. Let's do
it. Right? No. No. When you don't want
a fair fight, you wanna win, that means
you're a coward. That means you wanna secretly
manipulate because you can't win otherwise. That's what
we think is happening.
You see this hat?
Free Cuba. Stay tuned. The liberation of Cuba
is upon us. Oh, look at that. Okay.
Hashtag winning. Right? Another war coming on, guys.
No more wars. Peace president. It's just a
matter of time now. You see this hat?
Make Iran great. President Trump said, the only
way to make Iran great is for the
people to take over. Oh, okay. Okay. Interesting.
Well, make Iran great.
Yeah. You know what? It's it's a it's
a point you should ask. Maybe you want
that. Right?
Maybe you want
Iran to be great again.
Maybe you also want America to be great
again. Alright? That's okay. You could want both
those things. Clearly, you can want both those
things. But you can't
have both of them first.
See?
That matters, doesn't it? So is it Iran
first or is it America first?
Right? Okay. Well, if you're making America great
again
and Iran great again, I guess you could
do them simultaneously.
But is that what you want as Republicans?
Do you want do you want half America
first, half Republican? Or do you want you
want America first? Right? Well, you get the
point. That's not even remotely what's happening. I
think the reality for most conservatives that's setting
in really alarmingly right now. But,
let's just move that point aside.
No more wars? Okay. Well, Cuba. Oh, so
Cuba bad. Okay. Well, wait. We're gonna get
to the cartels in Mexico, which apparently is
already kicking off
with no at the helm apparently, which is
insanely alarming. Even, like, what the word I
was looking for yesterday was was failing up
is what they keep doing.
Noam gets destroyed, gets proven to be a
literal, like, profiteer, criminal. Whatever you also wanna
call she's doing gets exposed for being the
most embarrassingly stupid person in the conversation. Nobody
believes she has any actual ability, and yet
she gets put into a position where she's
somehow controlling, at least as it appears. I
I kinda doubt that's a reality. Rubio, whatever
else.
A new international,
like, global control dynamic.
It's insane, guys. It's absolutely insane. But Cuba
and the rest and Iraq, I mean, all
of this is more wars. All of this
is not a peace president. Do I but
do I even need to say it? Probably
not.
We're marching through the world. We're cleaning out
the bad guys. We're Yeah. Marching through the
world, cleaning out the bad guys.
America first.
Right?
You're gonna get the ridiculous children out there.
They're gonna try to contort that into, well,
we have to do that first before we
get this because, it's always the thing he's
doing. That's the thing for that'll lead to
the the we do that first and then
we'll get the thing. Okay. Cool. You tell
me when that happens. You ring your bell
and I'll come running. You know? It's just
not I don't see it happening.
I mean, understand that marching around the world
and getting rid of the bad guy, who
decides who's bad? Who decides which ones get
removed? Oh, I guess apparently Israel.
And we'll get to the eugenics part by
by the way, because that's very similar to
what we're hearing about getting rid of this
bad 1% of people because that's just how
you make societies great. Apparently, it's the crime
gene.
I'm not kidding. That's Stephen Miller. Have relationships
with new people that will make us prosperous
and safe. I've never seen any anybody like
it. This is Ronald Reagan plus.
Donald Trump is resetting the world in a
way nobody could have dreamed of a year
ago. Plus,
Donald Trump is resetting the world. Trump is
resetting the world. Trump is resetting the world
in a way nobody could have dreamed of
a year ago. Nobody could have dreamed of
a year ago, you know, other than Klaus
Schwab.
He is the greatest commander in chief of
all time. Our military is the best of
all time. Iran is going down, and Cuba
is next.
God. What a clown.
Right? I mean, on top of the fact
that it's just like, you know, it just
screams weakness when clearly you're not sitting good
right now. There's a lot of problems. We'll
get into munitions if we have time today.
And the reality of all this, if not
tomorrow, I'm I'm I'm planning to do a
show tomorrow. We'll get into all the rest
of this stuff, hopefully, as soon as as
early as I can. But, you know, it's
you're not doing I mean, I'm not gonna
say you're losing because I don't know. I'm
not gonna be like the rest of these
partisans that dab, but there were we're winning
entirely and The US has never been stronger.
Or the other side going, Iran's killing everybody
and The US has never been weaker. Well,
probably somewhere in the middle. Right? I mean,
genuinely, like, that's always tends to be the
case. Now I'll I'll give you some thoughts
when we get there about which way I
stay this leaning, and I don't think The
US is doing as well as it's claiming.
But I have no real way to know
the reality on the ground of Iran, so
it's hard to know. That's what I mean.
It's like somewhere in the middle. But so
what I mean in that sense is that
I can see how The US is having
some failures they're trying to hide. But that
doesn't always mean that they're losing in response
to what the is Iran may have just
as many problems in what they're dealing with.
It's it's important to question this stuff. But
my point though is that what we can
see with the discussion of the like, the
the discussion of bringing them all together to
trip quadruple manufacturing and what that clearly shows
you or the fact that they're already getting
locations completely decimated they claimed weren't or the
cutter
billion dollars,
surveillance system that even Doug Douglas MacGregor told
you the Achilles said they took out their
eyes. On top of that, I mean, you
could go on forever. The point is it's
pretty clear that they're they're struggling in a
lot of ways and trying to make it
look like they're not. And so to come
out and do this, we're stronger than ever.
This is the best thing ever. We're so
strong. We're beating everybody. It just screams weakness.
It's like 2,008 the day before going, we've
never been stronger. I've never seen a financial
economy stronger than ever, and then everything collapses.
That's what their job is. That's what these
people do. And they may not even know,
like that idiot on The Economic Show that
had maybe no idea and then claps. You
know? It's but I tend to think they
know more than they think or more than
they let on. But I don't think people
like this are truly in the know of
what the larger conversation is. Some of them.
I don't know which. You know, Graham might
be up there, but most Congress is my
point. I don't think most of these people
are truly in the know of what's going
on.
But as you know, just the the bullet
points. Resetting the world.
Looking not looking for a fair fight. Marching
through the world and cleaning out the bad
guys. Cuba is next. Hashtag winning. Great reset.
Peace president.
How crazy. Right? How embarrassing. Oh, and don't
forget, by the way, Donald Trump has endorsed
him. Right? So all these arguments about all
the things and all the bad stuff. Well,
Trump's already endorsed Lindsey Graham for 2026, and
he's absolutely do everything he can, including apparently
flying to Kentucky to fight against Tom Massey,
which is just it speaks for itself, guys.
Republicans before this were told when you told
you Graham was the bad guy. Mike Mike,
Johnson's the bad guy. They're rhinos. Right? We
want Massey and all them, and now we're
here and, oh, Massey bad guy to the
dishonest ones.
Trump is siding with the people who have
no interest in anything he promised you before.
In fact, the exact opposite. Same point every
time.
Now here's what he said about Lindsey Graham
in 2019.
Never fails.
Lindsey Graham just said of your remarks that
you made in the Oval Office that if
you keep talking like that, quote, this will
be a disaster
worse than Obama's decision
to leave Iraq. Now Lindsey Graham would like
to stay in The Middle East for the
next thousand years with thousands of soldiers and
fighting other people's wars.
I wanna get out of the Middle East.
Oops.
Well, see, you could look at this two
ways.
He or he actually thought like that until
Israel compromised him or whatever you wanna talk
about. Think whatever you think happened.
Or this is just him lashing out because
Lindsey Graham said something he didn't like, which
both of those perfectly line up with exactly
who this man this petty person is. I've
seen him scream things that challenge what he
was saying yesterday because somebody poked him in
the eye, and he just lashes out. Right?
Or each of them hating each other before
they're now in the the unity team, and
everyone's stronger than ever. Now, Nom, you're fired.
You know? And apparently, Bondi might be next.
You know? It didn't surprise me. Rumblings.
Like I said, Cash, Bondi, Gnome, those seem
to be the most obvious standout stupidity in
the conversation, so it wouldn't surprise me.
So here
is just in case you wanted to see
it on, you know, Trump already said this.
You guys know this, but it's just to
keep it in the conversation. Trump claims Cuba
is at the end of the line. That
was seventh.
I think it was the sixth, but it's
reported on the seventh. Now here he is
at his new press briefing for the shield
of America, which quite literally looks like Avengers.
I'm not even kidding. When somebody said that,
they probably got that off an Avengers movie.
I it was funny. But now that he
look at this logo. I mean, god, these
people are ridiculous.
Trump's warns of imminent action against Cuba at
his shield of America's summit.
Are we still pretending to peace president and
no new wars? Are we are we are
we just moving on from that? Now we're
at the narrative of, well, we had to
because x and y and z. Okay. Fine.
Still that but those are new wars, though.
Right? We're on that same page? No. It's
not a war. It's an operation.
Okay.
Good
times. Well, here's mister Nick Ridiculous. He says,
president Trump tells Latin America leaders that we
will start treating cartel terrorists as ISIS. You
know, the ISIS that they arm and fund
and work with, and Israel does as well.
Just as we formed a coalition to eradicate
ISIS in The Middle East, we now form
the coalition
to eradicate cartels. You know, the ISIS that
they just had bombed something, like, two days
ago, but eradicated.
Sorta like he obliterated something that they otherwise
have to bomb again tomorrow. I guess he
doesn't know his words very well. But, overall,
a coalition to eradicate ISIS, what was that
called again, guys? Wasn't that oh, that's right.
The war on terror that apparently is even
though they claim it, it was still going
because they're still using the things they claimed
out of that. That's what's called a forever
war. That's literally, guys, what created the terms
for for for for for forever war.
Okay. Just so that's clear.
So this guy who literally screamed all year
about why forever wars were gonna stop is
now telling you this new forever war is
the best thing since sliced bread. That's what
I said down here. A new forever war.
This is what you voted for. Right, Nick?
Apparently.
Oh, so here here I'll I'll play that
clip real quick, and you can hear what
he said, and then I'll I'll give you
some thoughts on the cartel.
We formed a coalition
to eradicate ISIS to the Middle East. We
must now do the same thing to eradicate
the cartels at home. Yeah. For who I
guess Netanyahu wrote that for him. I'm I'm
laughing about how these days, how
he's almost all it seems like he's reading
off of something all the time. He never
used to really do that as much. Oh,
he's always big about off the cuff, you
know? But
I don't know. That's it's weird. Who's writing
these things? It seems it's just funny.
Good question, I think. Even though Dusan is
probably somebody in his team, it's well,
it's interesting. I think that what he's discussing
here is a very flagrant challenge to what
he ever told you he was gonna do,
and that's why I question those things.
So,
obviously, that's a forever war. I mean, that's
what that is. That's literally
a a a gain a a global entity
that is aimed at stopping something that they
define however they want to, that'll go on
for as long as they want to, which
will lead to occupations of countries
in at least in a financial sense or
in some kind of a or literal on
the ground or quite literally dealing with the,
like, with the Delce Rodriguez point, the oil
they're already taking.
This is nothing new, guys. This is just
the recontinuation.
Rather, Trump putting a fine point and a
label on exactly what they've already been doing.
And, I mean and, okay, we're fighting the
cartels. Are we really gonna play this game
again? I'll just include this clip that that
Jason made for our show
where we discuss this. I don't think it's
entitled.
The episode was entitled Trump's new $2,000,000,000
WHO.
FDA walks back food dye ban. Let's not
forget about that. Under the burrito of all
this conversation, they literally lied about everything they're
doing. And US government's long documented cartel connections.
Yeah. It wasn't there.
And it's a good clip. It's about twenty,
twelve minutes. And I mean, guys, these are
you can go through this for yourself, and
I hope you will, but it's more than
this. There's so many examples.
So many examples of the US government getting
caught. I mean, here, watch the clip. And
Israel getting caught training cartel members.
It's incredible how much we have on this
stuff. But just the one that I just
the most recent that I show every time.
It's just this was from 2025.
The wiretap. The DEA laundered $19,000,000
of cartel drug money into cash and crypto.
As far as I don't I don't think
anybody in of of substance actually got in
trouble.
Yeah. We're fighting those cartels. So whatever that
means. That that means, you know, whatever they
don't like in that area. You know, whatever
they wanna claim cartels are while working with
them in every discernible way or working. We're
fighting MS thirteen, but here they go. We'll
send them back to you, bouquet lay. Have
a good time.
Trump's golden dome. On top of all of
that, could cost $1,000,000,000,000
to shield America from missiles.
Golden dome.
$1,000,000,000,000.
All of this is the same kind of
thing, guys. Now the Shields of America is
a coalition to stop the, you know, I
guess, the whatever they claim they're fighting out
of the guys that fighting cartels in regard
to, like, the, you know, the their hemisphere.
Right?
This is the overlap in regard to whatever
we're talking about from, like, a
electronic sense. But this is just The United
States, arguably, I guess, maybe
can't you know, whatever they include. But, you
know, I'm thinking the idea about the Technate
idea.
And so overall, $1,000,000,000,000
on top of everything else.
This is just a nonstop we talked about
this already. Just to include this in your
mind about all these things. Every one of
these are challenges to what were promised.
Now here is them clapping about signing this
alongside
all of these different countries that at one
point they would have called Banana Republics. But,
you know, it's all good because they like
what I had to say that day. Now
they're the democracies. Right?
By stroke of a pen, Eric Daugherty says,
and flanked by many Latin American heads of
state president Trump forms the Shield America's
Coalition, an initiative that will decimate the cartels
and narcoterrorists in our hemisphere, except the ones
you work with, though. Trump only Trump could
pull this off.
Same
thing.
You know? These are people that were screaming
about now more forever wars, and this is
the beginning of just a new hemisphere focused
war on terror, whatever they wanna call Let's
not forget they're mashing together cartel terrorism, drug
lord, whatever, narco terrorism. It's the same that's
right there. So war on terror, narco style,
whatever you wanna call it. Or whatever they
wanna broaden that out to.
So guess what? It's already started.
Let's let's make sense of that. Okay. So
they literally just signed this paper, boom, and
we're already bombing things. So in case you're
not that smart, that means they already started
before they signed that thing. And all it
really comes down to is that they're ultimately
doing this regardless of whether they gave you
that real play signing dynamic. This is them
continuing the bombings they were already doing
of fishermen that they claim were doing something
wrong or people who were moving drugs and
boats in international waters that they have no
legal right to bomb or that they didn't
actually care to look and found out they
were people who were I mean, we caught
we talked about this when it was happening
extensively, and it never really stopped.
But the first many examples were undeniable, guys.
So here's HEKESETH. Alright. Never mind's account is
a commentary account. But here's the, South Command.
On March 8, the direction of South Com,
Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on
a vessel operating in designated terrorist organizations.
So what's the what what are you the
signing of all this and creating all this
dynamic that this is about some kind of
legal cover in I in my mind.
These are terrorism. Terrorist acts.
Now on top of all of it, here's
Graham's gonna tell you, you know, what's really
all about. But she's I'm kind of joking,
but, you know, here's the point. This regime
goes down, we're gonna have a new Mideast.
We're gonna make a ton of money. Nobody
will, threaten the straits of hormones
again. But
Yeah. Just casually include you know, we'll make
a lot of money.
I'm sure that's not what it's all about
to some of them.
Profiting off of the destruction of a country,
you know, that's typical. That's that's you good
old classic US foreign policy.
Now in a larger sense about reimagine
or rather,
resetting the world, I mean, how else do
you see this?
How else do you see with the multiple
folks, some multiple this is a world dynamic
right now. This is not a regional thing.
This goes around the world, guys. And what
he's doing with Israel guiding his hand, or
rather the other way around, is quite literally
war of aggression for control for a global
entity.
I don't know why we can't acknowledge this
out loud. I mean, you can't build a
global international order called the Board of Peace,
which is supposed to be about peace while
you conduct war everywhere and not call yourself
a globalist
with a logo that's quite literally the technate
of the global map. You also have plenty
of examples of how their agenda has been
clear from day one.
Elon Musk. I mean, all of this. These
people are I mean, Larry Fink. You can't
pretend like this is not exactly what we
were criticizing
right before.
Introducing these things at Davos and the UN,
I think, makes all the difference.
WHO proposals,
the entire network state discussion.
Now the BlackRock discussion, I think, is a
good point to add to this because of
response here as well. But Shaybo says two
of the world's largest funds are limiting the
amount you can withdraw.
BlackRock froze requests for withdrawals of $1,200,000,000
from its private credit fund. Investors in BlackRock
Fund with assets of 26,000,000,000 requested the withdrawal
of 9.3 funds 9.3%
funds. BlackRock refused, limiting withdrawals to 5%. The
BlackRock funds, with fund with assets of 82,000,000,000
oops. Went back.
Recorded a record number of requests for withdrawals
in the same week. Blackstone Blackstone had to
invest 400,000,000 of its own funds to cover
these cost of withdrawals. Similar problems exist with
BlueLOBDC
to fund where withdrawals have been suspended.
What do they see coming?
BlackRock limits redemptions of private credit funds. Well,
this is interesting.
This person says, BlackRock, part of the globalist
movement. Yeah. I agree.
Defeated.
Why? Because this meme said so. Look at
that cool meme with Trump and a flying
eagle and a flag and totally just knocking
down the dominoes of the World Economic Forum
even though we spoke there as a part
of it, produced his new plan there. They
signed on to it, and he's gonna go
next year. You know? But, yeah, he shut
it all down because he said pronouns are
bad. And and Lutnick said, globalism is bad,
then he introduces this new globalist plan.
That's, this is embarrassing that we even pretend
like this makes sense, guys. Okay. BlackRock. Right?
Part of the globalist movement, but it's been
defeated, she says. Well, then let me know
why Larry Fink is part of Trump's inner
circle. We can't be this dumb, guys. We
can't fall for people out there, which are
probably bots, trying to convince everybody that everything's
going the way you want it to. Just
go back to sleep. Stop looking. Don't man
the mind behind the curtain. Don't mind the
man behind the curtain.
It's always the same. And it's everywhere.
As always, though, I'm pretty convinced that most
people see it.
Now the ideology driving a lot of this,
I don't think has ever really gone away,
guys. And this is a crazy thing to
me.
This stems from Stephen Miller.
Stephen Miller. Surprise, surprise.
This guy is a supremacist
extremist
in every possible way. He makes that very
clear.
Stephen Miller is right, this person says.
The high culture that made the West so
superior to everywhere else
on earth,
clearly a subjective opinion, only came because Western
Europe executed
1%
of each generation for centuries.
Oh, that that that's all? That's simple. Just
execute the ones you don't like. That seems
like a quick quick path to the best
possible society.
I mean, do does it whoever take who
takes these people seriously?
Pseudo intellectuals, that's who. And weeding weeding the
crime gene.
That's Stephen Miller. Now this is this is
Will Tanner who's tuskussing it, but that's what
he is discussing. The crime gene.
Out of the population through centuries of capital
punishment
for everything from larceny to murder, Western Europe
made itself a paradise.
Oh, did it? And blossomed into the greatest
high civilization the world has ever seen over
eighteen, nineteen centuries. Well, even that could be
debated.
Like, I'm sure westerners think that.
Right? I mean, you could talk to people
that live in different styles of life that
don't maybe don't want all the things you
thought would made your life happy. It's just
a perspective thing, and I hate the supremacist
mindset of the way we view the world
today.
So he says, quote, the West only achieved
the place that it did in human history
because it spent previous centuries
eradicating the criminal elements within its territories.
Well, who gets to decide that?
What you know, what's a crime to you?
Apparently, saying Israel's bad is a crime to
Miller.
The West that we came to know that
had the great music and architecture and science
and most powerful economy had spent centuries previous
to that establishing order first. And order means
killing 1% of your population that you don't
agree with.
That's a 100% true. High civilization requires order
and what what's high civilization?
Requires the pruning of the tree of civilization
to achieve it.
I don't know if you realize it, but
this is terrifying
logic or rather rhetoric.
Now you could just call it Nazi if
you want, but Nazi means the Nazi party.
This but this is the same kind of
vibe, guys. This is supremacist
eugenics.
That's what this literally is by definition.
Peter Saint O'Neill's PhD,
responding to Will, says you don't get social
peace
unless you're willing to permanently eradicate
or eliminate
the worst 1% of society.
Okay. Well, I disagree, you know, that killing
one percent of billions of people is pretty
insane, personally,
whether or not you decide they're bad. And
how exactly do you get to some kind
of an objective ruling on who those bad
people are?
I guess the elitist decide for you. How
else does that work? Right? Right? Mark Andreessen?
Right? Peter Thiel? Right? Elon Musk? Right? Everybody
else in the lead of circles left or
right? Yes. That's correct. They pick for you
because they know better.
And Elon Musk agrees.
Yep. That's right. That's correct.
That's terrifying to me. Here's what I said.
This is eugenics.
You need to look this up if you
don't remember what we're talking about, guys. We've
talked about this forever. James Korpers don't work
on this for a long time.
The study of how to arrange reproduction within
the human population to increase the occurrence of
heritable characteristics regarded as desirable.
This is Nazi level discussion, guys. This is
about the idea of breeding out certain things
of certain people.
Now these lunatics
have genetics, genetic manipulation. Right? The the science,
the technology
to then do that. One point, they just
thought, let's kill the bad ones. And now
at a time when they're talking they're still
discussing that, weeding out the crime gene.
Right. Because it's not your fault. You just
commit crimes because in your in your DNA.
Right?
Well, that's
half as full half as like, just a
shaving away from, well, black people.
Right? Or or or these kind of people
or this kind of religion or yep. That's
the whole thing, guys. These are supremacists.
You could make it about whatever you want.
It's the same point. To say that certain
kinds of people have no or you're just
don't know any better, that you're born with
a certain thing that you can't get past,
we have to get rid of you. You
can make it white, black, Jewish, Christian, whatever
you want. It's all insane, and none of
it actually makes sense. And frankly, none of
it's even scientific.
Who gets to decide what characteristics qualify
for weeding,
Elon?
Who who decides if you're in those groups
in the first place?
Oh, the same Epstein class. Apparently, Eugenics was
born in The United States. In case you
don't know that, it was adopted by the
Nazis.
It's all coming back around. It seems, in
fact, it never really left.
And that's not some kind of Nazi World
War two point, guys. It's about the ideology
that drives these things, whether Nazis or not.
And that's always been there. It's super important
that we understand that because, guys, these people
are not just influential. They're driving the bus
right now.
Now on the point of media manipulation, which
is what Elon is a huge part of,
I just thought this was hilarious, but also
important to see.
Janice Girl points this out. Israel influencer
sues Israel for nonpayment and just happens to
be our old buddy, Elon Levy.
You know, the guy who got fired for
lying and then continue to propagandize for Israel
and is now demanding payment for the times
that he was fired and wasn't actually being
paid by right. So then it seems that
he was not fired. And the idea was
to create a circumstance where you're like, I'm
just a guy that loves Israel. No. You're
being paid to lie about Israel. That's what
they do, though. Right? That's the reality. You
know, whether it's $7,000
or whatever they were being paid.
Lawsuits equating millions of shekels have been filed
against the Israeli government for stiffing their paid
influencers.
Among those who didn't pay, who didn't get
paid, Elon Levy. You gotta love this. Israel
also flew paid protesters to The Hague to
protest against the pro Palestinian protesters.
This is the kind of world we're living
in, guys. We know this. But you see,
these people will point out
there'll be a protest somewhere.
And certainly, as I've always said, yes, that
could be manipulated, influenced. There could be paid
protests. That's in any circumstance. But in many
cases where there are genuine protests going on,
And you get the right and the left
of the same thing when their time comes.
They go, oh, they're all a bunch of
sorrows, so and so, and they're all paid.
Yeah. Possibly. Prove it, though. I'd like to
see evidence. But either way, protests, they have
a right, whether they're paid or not.
In this case, you have
verifiable realities of whether influencers align, these guys
getting paid to go out and create fake
protests, fake anything, and you don't hear a
a peep.
Why? Because it's the same thing every time.
Just like you didn't hear the left calling
out things about COVID when was their time,
because partisans are dumb. I shouldn't even say
it like that. Manipulative.
I mean, look, I you know my opinion.
I think very clearly. When it comes to
people I don't know. When I say that,
I mean team sport partisans.
Not that you believe you have more, you
know, prince more in line with
conservative or liberal. Those are just opinions. Those
are just policies. My mind is that people
that are team sport partisan players that will
ignore the facts and their integrity and their
principles for the team. That's what I'm talking
about. I do find that stupid.
But at the end of the day, the
right way to frame that, not to be
subjective, is just manipulative. People that don't really
care about what they're doing, they care about
what they're being driven to do or what
they wanna achieve by manipulating you. Elon Levy
is a disgusting human being. And I mean
that objectively based on what he has said
about starving children, about bombing innocent people.
They're disgusting. And now they're not getting paid.
Now they're suing the government that paid them
to lie about the what's I think that's
poetic justice.
Here's the article, by the way, in case
you thought it was just from Dennis Guro.
This is Israeli media.
Claims in the millions. They were recruited to
Ford Outreach at the height of the crisis
to lie to you. Right? And then discovered
they were being shafted. Well, guess what? You
know what that shows me? That shows me
that everyone's struggling.
You don't stiff the people trying to lie
for you unless you just don't have the
funds, I would argue. At the end of
the day, they are stretched thin like we
know where The US is, and I think
that's what this shows.
Now on media, that's super embarrassing. You might
have seen this.
And what I mean, this is just the
same thing. In regard to control over media,
the manipulation, the propaganda, left or right,
here's Fox News.
You probably saw what's going around. Now the
quick story in this, and you can watch
it. It's very, very broadly covered.
Is that he had, what they call it,
it's a
dignified transfer
when a a an American's died because of
their illegal foreign wars, and they, you know,
salute as they march them into the plane
with a coffin and a flag over the
coffin. Right? Just like the just like the
meme we just talked about.
And, of course, reports are are upwards of
hundreds have been killed, and they're only lying
about seven of them or telling you seven.
You can decide for yourself. That's true. I
think it's pretty obvious that they're hiding something
like they have every single time I've been
involved in this. I mean, the sense of,
like, bodies being killed, like, with the Iraq
bombing, all the all the so what did
they say? A 100 concussive, you know, brain
injuries.
They just think we're that stupid.
But the point here is that they had
this, and Trump shows up with a ball
cap on, which frankly, I don't care. I
don't I don't see why that would be
taken as some kind of an insult. But
either way, I mean, there's a decorum point
we made, but that's that's for these people
to do what they want. Trump shows up
in a in a baseball cap or whatever.
MAGA hat.
And this has been very widely covered.
Then, apparently, the story goes that he was
angry or people were criticizing him, so he
called Fox News and says, don't show that.
And what'd they do? Well, they went they
dutifully
did what they were told. And instead,
they lied to everybody and they got an
older clip, which is from December,
and showed him looking like that. Even though
it says
Saturday.
So you can decide
if that's dishonest. I mean, it is. They're
lying to you. And what it ultimately shows
is that that, as many pointed out, is
that they're working for the Trump administration.
At the very least, that they'll as as
CNN recently said, well, Israel says we're not
allowed to show this, and so they don't
show it to you. That's where we are,
guys. They're not even hiding anymore. That Fox
News was like, oh, it'll embarrass him, so
let's just show something else. You might find
that to be a small point.
That's not journalism.
That's that's propaganda.
And speaking of propaganda,
off Guardian rightly points this out. What does
this remind you of? What where's what they
posted? And this this was like a government
posted thing that says, dear the rest of
the world, we're just cooler than you cooler
than you. Sorry. Sincerely, America.
God, that's cringey. It's embarrassing. And frankly, if
you hopefully, if you're out there watching the
show, that is not what I think most
Americans are like. That is what they want
you to think. That is the supremacist, manipulative,
partisan, childish thing that is I don't believe
represents most people in this country. I could
certainly be wrong. I know that they exist
and they're everywhere,
but I laugh at people like this because
that's just ridiculous. It's childish.
But what does this remind you of?
I don't wanna play the music just because
it's obnoxious.
I'll make a point about it in a
second.
Oh, so you got military personnel
doing little dances for the, the video.
It's almost like they have the same playbook
every time no matter what they're doing.
It just goes on forever, and it's all
this weird compilation of you know? And as
you as right rightly so, off Guardian getting
dancing nurses vibes.
It's the same thing. I was just the
same stuff. Left, right, government
is the government. And they're putting these things
out to, oh, you know, dancing military in
the midst of a very serious dynamic. Well,
here's some videos with video game graphics in
it because we take this very seriously.
So the song they're playing is The Sound
of Silence.
Because of course it is. Right? Because these
people are this stupid, I don't think they
even understand that I think, oh, that sounds
cool. And it was the,
what's the group that redid it?
I forget. You know, not the original, but
the group that redid the song.
Do they know what this song is about?
This is about as stupid as was it
Reagan who used Fortunate Son?
Thinking that you're, like, you know or are
born in The USA? Like, okay. Those things
are pretty critical of the US government, but
they don't care because, oh, USA? Woo hoo.
This is cool. Right? Fortunate Son. Yeah. You
know, these songs are critical of your war
policy, but you're dumb, so you don't care.
Like, the song, Sound of Silence, it just
kills me. These people don't or maybe they
are trying to use it anyway. I don't
know. But it's just embarrassing what's going on
right now, and it stands out very, very
clearly to me.
And censorship.
Mike Freisner all added this. I was included
it to make sure it was in this
section. Right? Discuss this account being censored, which
was brought back, but it was censored for
twenty four hours when they were trying to
convince people at the peak of the sharing
of this that they don't need they have
rights to
be a conscientious objector.
Well, Appalachian Liberty points out how
Twitter is all about free speech. Right?
Update on my post. I appealed the decision.
The decision was upheld.
So this exact wording is indeed considered violent
speech. Okay. Here we are. Right? Right? Charlie
Kirk has free speech, hate speech, bondy tell
you. They they they want you to believe
they hear you. Right?
Charlie Kirk said hate speech is free speech.
Right? Then Bondy comes out pointing to Charlie
Kirk and says hate speech is not free
speech
and using his name.
They know what they're doing. They're very dishonest.
So in this case,
it's one step further. Right now, you're you
are the left. If you are fighting for
this, if you agree with what Bonnie and
Trump and the rest of them are doing,
you are the left you so despise if
you're in the partisan game.
Because violent speech
is free speech.
Regardless of what you words are not violence.
That was a huge thing during the left
right party when you guys were fighting the
left. Now you're in power. Now suddenly violent
speech is dangerous because you said the word
fascist.
All of you are ridiculous.
But this is where this gets important.
He tagged Harrison Smith and says Israel would
be easy to destroy.
Just quit paying their bills for them and
defending them when they say stay a new
war.
That is what he just got censored for.
That's what they tagged.
Violent speech.
Israel will be easy to destroy.
You mean, you know how many people right
now are discussing how easy Iran or how
Ron might be destroyed and how what they
wanted to be destroyed, kill everybody in Iran.
It's all over the place.
And then he says, quit paying their bills,
depending on them. I mean, clearly, you know
what this is.
This is because Israel and their a every
Israeli
driven Zionist apparatus is focused on all of
this, all these platforms, and it is coming
down like a hammer.
And if you're not honest about this, everyone's
going to see who you are because this
is not free speech.
He says, just for contrast, these posts are
apparently fine and not restricted in any way.
We need white genocide now.
We need white genocide. I responded to one
cry one Christ king p h a p
g. You it's clearly about white genocide. So
this person is very much a partisan. Right?
I would argue anyway.
Not that there's not points to be made
about that exact discussion, but that it seems
to be the over focus. I mean, I
could be wrong. But either way,
you could look up credit, like, people right
now going because that's that's what I would
think. Like, right now, you know, people out
there going Iran should be destroyed.
Or rather that Iran's so weak, it could
be destroyed tomorrow. It's the same point.
Doesn't matter. I mean, I again, I don't
even think these points need to be expressed.
I think this is self evident.
But there's a lot of lying manipulators out
there. That's the problem. And I think that's
becoming more seen than ever.
But Twitter and Elon Musk are censoring people
for saying that Israel is easy to destroy.
Period.
That's censorship. That's not free speech. And I,
apparently, am being censored as well like I
always am on this platform. Just Raprimo Radical
says, just realized I am somehow no longer
a following a bunch of accounts that I
was. Also, seems that I'm not able to
follow TLav at the moment.
Looks like he ended up getting it
for some reason. Are we back to the
pre Elon shadow banning impression throttling and concealed
censorship?
It's never stopped.
Now Daniel McAdams also points out,
any update on how x maintains safety in
x,
maintain safety of Twitter in times of crisis?
This is x safety pointing it out. As
part of Twitter's incident response protocol
Twitter?
I just screwed myself up by hitting that.
Where was that? Protocol
Basically, as part of Twitter's incident response protocol,
there is Twitter initiated proactive manual sweeps
to identify and remove
violet violet
violative like, violating content in less than three
hours
from initial strikes. I find that an interesting
framing
in the time of strikes happening in the
world. This sweeps have been running twenty four
seven. Response was initiated and are supplemented with
weird timing. Don't you think? X is actively
scaling its enforcement by building okay. The bottom
line, guys, is they shut down.
On the sixth,
made a massive push, and everyone noticed what
went away.
All of the content showing Tel Aviv being
bombed.
And Daniel McAdams says, this is why you
cannot find any accurate posts about what's actually
happening in Israel and Iran. Twitter is functioning
as a sensor for the US government. No
big deal or rather no excuse me. No
no nothing new, excuse me, in the name
of safety,
just like they did during COVID. Same s
h I t.
Honest people can see this. It's the same
situation, guys, with a little different flavor.
Now I'm thinking let's see.
Since what we covered in there, I'm thinking
I might just wrap it right now, guys.
I know that probably frustrates some people since
it's not as long as usual, because it's
also pretty late. But I have a good
amount I wanna get into that I feel
like if I get into it now, it's
gonna make this much, much longer. And I
wanna make sure I give this an attentive,
you know, like, I don't wanna get tired
and and wrap it up toward the end.
But I will end up getting
what I wanna point out here about a
couple of things that I'm gonna get to.
And it will be tomorrow for those who
didn't hear me in the beginning. I'll I'll
be doing this tomorrow, and I'll I can't
promise it'll be early in the day, but
that'll be my my my goal anyway. There's
always new things that pop up. You know?
Like, that's that's what you for those who
don't know, that's what tends to be the
thing is that I have stuff that I
pulled off, and then you get into the
day and it's like, oh my goodness. Some
new like, when of course, when the Iran
thing popped off, it was like, oh, man.
I had, like, 15 different topics pulled to
the side. This was well researched, like, multiple
things. And it's like, okay. Well, obviously, with
support, we're gonna talk about it. And those
things are still sitting there, and I may
or may not get to them. You guys
have no idea how many things that I
spend hours researching,
days, weeks researching that end up just kinda
falling to the side that I forget about.
You know? And like, so much because you
just can't get to everything. There's so much
going on. It's just incredible, guys.
But what I wanna get to in general
that I wanna get into is some discussion
about,
the AI overlap and anthropic as I was
telling you, which we did touch on, but
I wanna go into that a bit tomorrow.
If you didn't see it, the US State
Department has approved a $151,000,000,000
oh, excuse me, million dollars on top of
what they already been sending. On top of
what they sent and on top of what
they've sent on top of that, more. And
on top of that, Rubio has determined that
it's an emergency. So no congressional oversight. Oh,
weird.
At the same time, he's probably like, but
we don't even need it, though.
Watch. That's what they're doing.
Because emergency. That's why we don't have to.
But if I didn't need that, we you
know? It's what they're doing with the bombing
of Iran. You know that well, we shouldn't
have to.
War Powers Act is unconstitutional anyway, but we're
gonna try to meet it. It's it's slowly
moving the dial away from needing any of
that stuff, and that's what a lot of
these screaming people are pushing.
Well, yeah, that well, I'll get into a
lot of this tomorrow, but the the the
overall point of where the war is at.
Right? And this is
right. There's interesting discussions about this. One of
the main titles I saw was one week
into the war. The fallout is global, which
is very much the opposite of what want
people to think.
NPR NPR actually updated that title, and it's
funny that every, like, 100 of these posts
immediately changed it, which was to
what was it?
It went from one weekend, it's global,
to
what was it? It's right here.
Trump warns Iran will be hit very hard
as war enters the second week.
Quite a different title, don't you think? Oh,
and I will show you this tomorrow. But
it's just funny to me how and it
was every one of them, and I just
caught one that wasn't it didn't catch the
update. It's just funny how quickly everybody tries
to change the narrative everywhere you look.
And I think I'll leave it there in
general. Yeah. It's just a lot of updates
on a lot of this stuff. Now if
you haven't seen what's happening in Tehran,
I mean, it's it's they're bombing the oil
field. Here, I actually, I will show you
this real quick because I didn't wanna make
this point
about the gas.
Right? And the reality as as Hegseth here
tells you that Iranians who think they're going
to live, right, basically,
they're the only one who needs to be
worried is the Iranians who think who think
they're going to live
as they're indiscriminately bombing, which we can see
all over the place. I mean, the evidence
is insane. It's exactly what we see them
do everywhere else, Israel in particular.
Commercial or commercial civilian buildings, air airliners,
cell selenation plants, water. You know? I mean
and you got people cheering this on.
Obviously,
insane focused on civilian locations.
Oh, and by the way, as we promised,
they're now using the Ben Gurion Airport as
a base, as we told you they would,
as many others did as well. And
no one wants to call that. This you
know, people that have once called things human
shields will fail to call it that. Even
though we've now proven that it's still being
used as civilians because they told us that.
It is that's a civilian shield dynamic.
The lie about Mario Northwell telling you that
they bombed Kamini in some kind of underground
base that even Twitter called out
and said, nope. It was above the ground
and then removed because Elon Musk apparently could
just remove whatever he wants and nobody can
do anything about it? I mean, that's that's
the reality. And you could prove that's true,
by the way. It was there, and then
they removed it because we're in an information
war every single day. But as Syed points
out, no. That's nonsense. He was in his
office that he used for decades. It was
above the ground. But they have to make
it seem like it was some secret deep
underground base, you know, like all these other
three d maps that Israel lied about and
got caught lying about. Why? Because they want
you to think, one, that they're evil villains
hiding everything, but, two, because they bombed a
civilian building full of tons of other people.
They want you to think it wasn't.
It's as simple as that. And they're bombing
all over the place, everywhere you look.
And my point to end with here is
that they look at the sky, guys. This
is what Iran looks Tehran looks like right
now. You know why? Because they bombed tons
of oil facilities, all car it's creating a
toxic circumstance for them right now. Times excuse
me. Time magazine. The air is unbreathable.
Tehran's shrouded in cloud of toxic smoke after
Israel strikes fuel depot strikes fuel depot.
And, you could argue there's more going on
here. I considered that, seeing as how they
did the same things in Gaza. They're literally
poisoning these people. Or you could talk about,
like, a dioxin
East Palestine dynamic or whatever you wanna get
into. These people are suffering right now. All
the people of Tehran.
It's insane.
And what does that lead to?
Gas price problems. As Kuwait's telling you, OPEC's
fifth biggest producer said it had to reduce
oil because of Strait Of Hermos, which appears
to still be somewhat operative even though we're
here. You know, it's but what I'm told
is it's shut down by a huge degree
because of the threat. Right? But I still
see ships there, so consider
that. But I you know, they they're still
claiming there's a, you know, which I do
get. You know, the threat alone would brought
they say 94 plus percent is what I
read.
But so that all leads to the fact
that as Trump just said, don't worry.
Gas is gonna go down very quickly, way
down real quick. He just said that. Right?
Same time, you've got Cutter saying, nope. Probably
not, because it's gonna go up to a
150 barrel, and that might destroy the economy
of the world. Apparently, right now, it's at
a 110.
Last I heard, over a 100 was kind
of catastrophic. And here we are at a
110. But Trump's like, don't worry. It's all
gonna be fine. Oh, and then ten seconds
after that, he goes, don't worry. They if
they go up, they go up.
You gotta love the escalation. Right? That's that's
why I was laughing about that. Woah. Boy.
That escalated quickly. It goes from, they're gonna
go down real fast, to everything's going crazy
and we're bombing oil everywhere. Oh, they go
up. They go up. Oh, big deal. Hashtag
winning.
Well, on top of that,
they're telling you on Fox News that we're
gonna take the oil. That's what they're doing
right now. We're gonna take all the oil.
So I want you to think about what
we're talking about here. The reality that they're
literally bombing
bombing
oil facilities.
Right? Well, we also have the reality of
Iraq too.
Iraq, same conversation. Oil production in Iraq has
now declined by 3,000,000 barrels. Why? Because as
I already showed you, they have operations ongoing
in Iraq, even though we're not talking about
it. And on top of that, the Kurd
situation, which was overlapping with Iraq and Syria,
is part of this. Trump calls on Kurds
to go into Iran, but then stands up
now that it's already going on and goes,
I don't want that.
That's bad politics. We're not stupid, Trump. We
know you paid them. We know you armed
them. That's been going on well before your
administration.
We already have the evidence that you and
your administration have been doing this a week
before you started the attack on Iran under
the guise of diplomacy because you're a villain
like the rest of your government left and
right.
And now now I know Trump says he
doesn't want the Kurds. Well, it's happening already.
That's just his clumsy way of making it
seem like somehow he doesn't want it or
it's not happening even though we know it
is. Maybe like a backward way of hiding
the fact that you just armed separatists to
manipulate the government, which is a crime.
But either way,
Israel backing Kurds. It's already happening. They were
the ones that told you first they were
already on the ground, already invading by the
way, before Trump's even doing that. My point
though is that they're attacking
oil infrastructure.
And your gas is affected by that. You
think that's some you think that's a plan
with those limited strikes? Guys, is this somehow
about the taking out the bad government or
is this about destroying Iran? Is this about
destroying it for a larger global purpose?
You know, you don't really need to think
that hard to understand what this is. Everything
that's happening
is like a half a second mission creep
to the next thing they swore would never
happen right in front of you. The truth
is, guys, all this is affecting you. It's
like it's like when he said the tariffs
weren't gonna cause your grocery prices to go
up, and then, yeah, they did. And as
far as I can tell, they haven't even
really gone back down.
So we can lie to ourselves we want,
or we can be honest about what we're
dealing with and try to do something to
actually change it for the better, regardless of
who you support.
So I will be tuning in. Well, I'll
be I'll be, doing a show tomorrow, so
please tune in because we're gonna get right
back to all of this.
Honestly, I have one point that you're gonna
enjoy probably that I think is worthy of
calling out that, I can wait till tomorrow
about Alex Jones and the claim of suddenly
recognizing Israel and Trump is exposing you know,
basically telling you right now that that Trump
is out there telling you that foreign governments
have influenced this. He's literally playing a clip
of
Trump saying the Israel lobby is the strongest
lobby. You know, that clip that I played
a thousand times acting like he just discovered
it from 2025 going, what is all this?
I'm not even kidding. We'll get into tomorrow.
Like, acting like like he's baffled by what
what is this? Like, he's almost doing it
just like that.
And I've shared that thread, by the way.
I mean, I can show you the thread
right now.
Where was that?
This one, which you guys have seen so
many times.
Right? The other thread of exactly that topic.
Trump openly states that Israel used to control
the US Congress. Right?
Multiple, multiple examples of it. But over here,
he's showing you going, oh my god. Look
at this thing.
Most powerful lobby. What's happening?
Maybe because, you know, the group anyway, I'll
get it to it. Trust me. It's pretty
insane.
Because at the same time, they're talking about
the reality of this or at least giving
you, like, a fraction of part of it.
They're still in in a material sense or
whatever you wanna call it, like, in action,
we're supporting the real thing. Supporting
Israel, whether you believe that or not, supporting
Trump, supporting the team,
even though it's never been more clear my
entire life. And through that,
supporting globalism as much as that's pretty crazy
for people to think about with what he's
always been saying. But the truth is, guys,
most of these people are spinning out because
it's never been more clear to people. And
I'm glad to see that. Not just because
people like that deserve to be seen for
the manipulators they are, but because people out
there are finally starting to see the bigger
questions.
Right? Not which side, but do either of
them need to exist?
Right? Are we being lied to by all
of them? Is this about something much larger
than what we're actually talking about? I mean,
we should be asking these questions every single
day, questioning every single one of them no
matter who you support.
I know you guys agree.
Thank you for tuning in. Plenty more to
talk about.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.