It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Wednesday, 02/18/2026.
Thank you for joining me today. As I
told you yesterday, we're gonna be focusing on
or, you know, in part on the universal
flu shot that is going forward that I
will show you is connected back to this
administration and the US government at large
in in clear ways, but also through sort
of what I argue are, you know, sort
of a shell game kind of dynamic, which
I think is a lot of what happens
today in regards to the funding. Because
trust me, the government knows we're paying attention,
at least more than we have before.
But I'm gonna overlap that with a point
today in regard to bill HR seven zero
zero six,
which I'll point out the substack that I've
I've I've that I saw it first on.
Not familiar with them, but I wanna give
them a shout out because I thought they
did really good work on this.
And and just it's a quick substack breaking
down
very concerning developments from the Trump administration and
has to do with exactly what the title
says today. To put it as simply as
possible, the bill, which has not it's it's
it's this, so far, has only been approved
in the House, which, again, it it shows
you the Republican support for something that will
probably shock you if you haven't read the
title. And it's far more than just Gavi,
the idea of a bill that is bypassing
HHS
and, I guess, arguably, RFK Jr.
I say that because he's part of this
administration, but if there is a division on
this point, which is I think a lot
of people still believe. I don't know where
I stand on my opinion of RFK Jr's
real opinion and who was driving his actions.
But if there is a division amongst them
between pro vaccine, pro m mRNA,
what it seems to suggest is that Trump's
administration is using this to circumvent HHS using
the state department to fund Gavi.
And many other things around this conversation in
particular, but also things that probably are also
would frustrate Republicans,
like immigration assistance
and and and and refugee assistance
or funding
AIDS research in Africa
or AIDS contraception in Africa. All the things
that we just talked about, and rightly so,
people going, why are Democrats so ridiculous in
funding these things? Well, guess what? As I
was telling you then, it was not just
Democrats. Many of those things, including climate change
discussion points, are still being funded right now
through this administration.
Like, I've shown that probably six different times
in the show. Never breaks through because we're
not allowed to break through. But, nonetheless, the
point is important to see that this
shell game I mean, this this part of
it wouldn't even be called that because it
seems to be public, but a way to
kind of create to allow the same things
to continue that the
driving force
actually wants. Left right paradigm used to distract
people as usual. But also on top of
that, a great article coming out from Unlimited
Hangout about Robert Kadlek,
who has now been welcomed back in to
the Trump administration for the Department of War,
who is a central player in the biosecurity,
biomanipulation
of our apparatus, and was doing so during
Trump's first administration as a part of COVID
nineteen.
I don't know how any of these moves
individually could be supported by Republicans who claim
to support the things they say they're supporting,
let alone all of them alongside each other.
It's
over the top to me. All of this
is tends to be today, but it's still
important that we cover it objectively as possible.
But over though oh, more than those, and
even in that bill in particular, there's funding,
I mean, I think 36 mentions of Israel,
by the way, in this bill.
I don't even need to explain why that's
important and why it should bother you. But
on top of that, all sorts of other
funding discussions that we'll get into. But I
think what's important to start with again is
some updates that carry over from yesterday's show
that I think that I want you to
see, in particular to an article that, Kevorka
Mason put out, which I published today because
he did get back to me, and he
said that was something he wants to support.
And, you know, we're I've known him for
a while. I really do support his work.
I think he does a great job. And
that overlaps with Israel, as we were saying
in regard to this
hidden network discussion, at least in part that
we can see,
and a couple other points about Epstein that
I didn't wanna miss before we bring into
what we started with there. So let's get
into the the opening points here that I
think are relevant
yesterday's show.
The Empire Above Epstein and the Tightening Grip
of its Enforcement Arm. Now that title first
part of the title comes from the
article that I read from, Kavorko Masian of
Syriana analysis. And so here's the show we
went into. I'll I'll point to his work
in one second just to give you, to
show you where we posted it. But before
that, just to carry over from this show.
On this kind of general point, the empire
from above and the tightening group of its
enforcement, there's a part that I saw right
after the show that I know you guys
would be interested in. This whole first segment
kind of relates to that this this idea,
but True Stream Media put this out. I
just saw this right after yesterday's show. This
should have been at the end of the
show. Would have perfectly tied it all together,
and that's this point.
The tenth amendment center put this post out
saying, the DHS itself,
the DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, is
unconstitutional.
I agree. And shouldn't exist. I agree. Any
constitutional functions in this department could easily go
back to where they were before the surveillance
monster was created in 2002
during,
you know, and forward, during the emergency powers
hysteria that was nine eleven. Now this is
coming from raw alert saying the Department of
Homeland Security has sent legal requests to Google,
Reddit, Meta, Discord for names and email addresses
and telephone numbers of people who don't who
criticize ICE online as we reported yesterday.
So first of all,
you know, this is like it's like the
fire in a theater point for free speech.
It's something that people have somehow absorbed as
just, like, what we all agree on. But
do we?
And is that actually logical or it's not?
It contradicts the the these the your your
right to free speech in its every possible
way because that does include you lying, by
the way. It doesn't, but it also includes
the possibility for you to say that and
be wrong and not being held you know,
it's a it's a way the government was
always using this to say, okay. Well, you
know, yes. You have the right to say
what you want except in this little circumstance,
And that little circumstance has blossomed into almost
all the conversation. It's how that works. So
the point in in in, you know, an
abstract way is about
that manipulation. And so in this sense, about,
like, things that we know are inherent that
we are convinced aren't or shouldn't be. The
DHS or the Department
of Bureau of Land Management, for example,
is unconstitutional if you understand the re the
core and not some overlap of national security
or because of x, y, and z, which
you can always do.
Give
a core point to the constitution. And so
the bottom line is that something like the
Department of Homeland Security
that you most Americans would that that would
sound they would look at you like you
were a lunatic if you even bring this
up.
Because it's not expect or it's not something
that we,
allow most people or the government, the structure
allows people to think about. It's like saying,
should government exist? People go, what are you
even talking about? Even though it's something we
should genuinely be asking ourselves today. So government,
yes, but that's way further down the line.
Just realize that this kind of all encompassing
government surveillance apparatus for your safety has never
been about that. So we need to start
questioning these. Go even further, not just should
they have this power, but should this exist?
And let's go even further beyond that. I
just think that's really important to think about.
But on that point from yesterday, about the
hidden network and the real power of everything,
as they said, this shouldn't exist. True story
media adds the national emergency powers
declared in response to nine eleven are still
active. You guys know most most of you
probably know this and have been renewed every
single year, every year ever since. Left or
right, Trump or Biden, we have been living
under national emergency for twenty five years straight.
We don't talk about that because we pretend
now where this is just the new normal.
Right?
It's really important to think about. Now if
you watch yesterday's show, you'll know how much
that this perfectly would have brought together everything
at the end. Keeping all this in mind
though,
this was the poll the post, the quirk
originally posted on a Substack. Really hope you'll
read it again. I'm not gonna read it
again because it's quite it's longer. It's just
so worth your time. It really just discusses
the reality that people that you would have
never expected. The average person who barely pays
attention to politics are suddenly going,
you know, is this how things should work?
Is there something other than that president and
that government actually making these decisions? And you'd
be surprised how far this is actually reaching.
Epstein files the whole thing,
and it is at least opening that door
to people's mind you know, to to opening
your mind, rather, to that possibility that we
could choose another path and that there are,
in fact, other things guiding how the world
functions today, and it's not your vote.
Or at least people are asking these questions,
and my god, that is important to happen
today. So on that note, though, think here
this that that same mindset, just keeping this
I thought this was a funny post. If
you remember this from the Truman Show, think
about this in in this kind of analogy.
Right? So it says, they have figured out
their world is an illusion.
Their perception
is engineered.
Their leaders are puppets.
Their entertainment is a distraction.
Their labor is meaningless.
But will they do anything about it?
And that's that's the picture of when, you
know, at the if you've seen The Truman
Show, where he's like, oh, okay. He's starting
to figure things out.
Well, let's just well, let's just kinda wait.
You know, let's do our best to see
if we can keep him in line. Let's
see if we can add a couple more
things and throw a couple more things in
his way. Maybe he'll get distracted enough to
just play it out.
Really think about that, which is where we
are right now, where people are going, Woah,
hold on a minute. That's not right. I
can see the strings. Look at there's the
curtain right there. Look at the man behind
the curtain. And they're going, God, I hope
they just stop pointing.
Don't stop pointing.
Now on the point of, you know, the
the network behind everything, you know, I I
really hope I there's
plenty of different perspectives out there. And I
I I try to include
alternatives to mine,
you know, as often as I mean, I
I mean, I think you guy you guys
tell me. I think I do it quite
often. But the point is that I very
clearly see this, whether Zionism or Israel or
just what all of The US and Israel
and UK and what they're doing in the
world represent, as kind of the central issue
to what to all of this.
Doesn't mean it's the only thing. That doesn't
mean I couldn't be wrong. I'm saying all
that because I think it's important to recognize
that this is what I think, but, please,
just consider the larger point about something else
other than what we're being shown and given
is actually what's happening. But, you know, don't
take just my word for it. But the
the evidence here stands out pretty striking to
me in regard to the Israel influence on
our government. Now all that said, you know
how very clearly I think this is obvious.
I'm saying that to be objective, and it's,
you know, it's hard when you know, it's
like you can have something oh, hypothetically, if
we literally got caught Netanyahu,
like, what's a good analogy? Like, just something
you couldn't ignore. Like, literally going, Trump was
doing what he was told from Netanyahu, and
it was absolutely red handed caught. And then
they go, well, you know, in order to
make up a narrative, you go, but wait
a minute. It's right. You can see it.
Are we not looking at the same thing?
This is where all this is today. Israel
is absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt
influencing,
I'll keep it there just for make it
easy, our policy in this country. And if
you can't even acknowledge that, then you have
lost your way. Israel is publicly,
admittedly doing that. My point is it's going
well beyond just influencing and going to the
point of absolute control.
But we can prove the first part of
that. So it's important to think about how
clear this is and where we are. Now,
there's a quick little segment here overlapping with
Huckabee and Tucker that just stood out to
me, that I wanted to include based on
that hidden hand sort of network guiding what
we're dealing with.
As as Jeff writes, we have a government,
but it's not ours. Chris Menahan posted this
clip. Now I'm just gonna read it because
it's, it's not that long. It's almost five
minutes, but I'd rather just read it quickly
to give you the sentiment. It says in
a wild scene at a a town hall
event in Israel, by the way, because Huckabee's
there again,
Just like Lindsey Graham was there again, like,
the seventh time, because that's totally normal. It's
not at all, by the way.
And in Israel, again, an angry Israeli and
by the way, that's a different point since
he's the ambassador, but nonetheless, it blacked our
entire government.
An angry Israeli scolds Huckabee
because it's he says, quote, his friend, Tucker
Carlson, wants to strip US citizenship from dual
citizen Israeli Americans who fought in the IDF,
which would include his own son. By the
way, that's a genocidal action that the entirety
of the international community has deemed such. So
if you're in the IDF and you fought
during the genocide, then now you have things
to answer for. That's that's just a statement
of fact. That's not opinion. That's that's where
the world is. So it's funny that people
are still having a hard time, you know,
wrapping their mind around what it means to
participate in a military force that's openly, publicly,
proudly committing genocide. But it says these dual
citizens fought in the Israeli army to defend
America and Israel, which is not even remotely
what was actually happening.
In in most cases, not even to defend
Israel, if you understand what we're talking about.
But it says but now The Hague is
looking for them. They are not traitors to
America as they've been called publicly on television,
but politicians and your friend Tucker who say
they should be stripped of their American citizenship
immediately. This guy is just angry if you
listen to it. Huckabee takes it lying down.
He the the post writes and assures him
that The US is doing everything it can
to neuter the ICC, that's a direct quote,
and the ICJ to make it impossible,
as he said, for them to prosecute those
wanted for war crimes because they know similar
charges could be brought against Trump and Rubio,
that's what he's writing, but I agree, and
US officials in the future, which, by the
way, there's interesting overlaps to this very point
in the bill
about saying we no funding. We'll be allowed
to go here if we support the ICC
against Israel.
But America first, though. Right, guys?
He says the Trump admin is discussing serious
sanctions being placed on anyone or any country
who participate in what the entirety of the
world is already acknowledging is happening.
How do you even misunderstand that? Every day,
you get these individual points. That doesn't mean
you can prove the ins and outs of
how it all functions. But if you have
an example where the whole I mean, the
entirety of the international community, and I'm talking
about, at this point, even even The UK
has been in sync has been pointing and
making suggestions, like, people within their government, let's
say, have called it genocide. People in
it's become the outside of Israel and people
that they outright control,
hint hint, saying
that's not true. There is no genocide. And
then you got Netanyahu and get Ben Gavir
and the rest end up and proudly say
how they're going to, you know, Amalek, no
stone on a stone, kill everybody, every even
the goat. But, no, not a genocide. Now
starve them to death. Now bomb them while
they're intense. You know, it's it's an absurdity
we're living through. But if we know that
that's what's being seen by the all of
the leading factors, even their own human rights
groups, and then Trump still goes, that's not
happening.
I don't know how else you can even
understand that point.
What a perfect encapsulation for our special relationship,
it says. Now here
oops.
So keep keeping this in mind on Tucker
Carlson. Right? So that was the real point.
Just wanted you to get the the conversation.
This guy's out there angry. How dare you
be a part of The United States while
Tucker Carlson says something he thinks? That's really
what he's saying, by the way.
And so this happened. This was
this was posted this morning.
It took place either the day before
or the day before that,
and, ultimately, was about Tucker Carlson.
So
Tucker Carlson,
which is being reported today, said he and
his staff were detained in Israel
following an interview with Mike Huckabee. Well, how
interesting is that? Israeli officials confiscated his passport
and took his executive producer into an interrogation
room. The officials demanded to know why they
spoke what they spoke to Mike Huckabee about.
It was bizarre. We're now out of the
country, Tucker said. Okay. I must just be
a coincidence. Right? Well, Dominic Michael Trippie points
out new. Trump has now told Tucker Carlson
to, quote, turn down the temperature
on GOP rift over Israel.
Carlson now currently visiting Israel per the Jerusalem
Post. Now, technically, that should have been the
one before because he's now back, but think
about this. Think of the timing of all
this, where Trump's going, woah. Woah. Woah. Stop.
You know? Hey. Tone down all that free
speech, doctor Carlson, because it's in it's uncomfortable
for our special relationship.
I mean, we have to be people who
can support this don't have principles. Unless you
just believe this is what things should be
like. I hear that's not what you guys
say out loud, so I find it hard
to believe.
So realize, here's Jerusalem Post,
Trump behind Carlson's Israel visit to reduce heat
in conservative antisemitism debate.
Trump sends a journalist to Israel to get
taught why he should think things differently and
then ultimately gets detained by Israel because Mike
Huckabee
I mean, I I mean, I can't I
can't prove that that inter interaction with Huckabee
about Tucker Carlson was why that happened. But
come on. There's something swirling around this. And
whatever the driving force is, is this what
America first looks like? Are you gonna stand
by your American journalist who's detained illegally by
a foreign government because he said things about
them? Or are you gonna side with your
special relationship and call that America first? Or
any any part of this. It's just not
what if you're a Republican, you need I
mean, I don't even need to say it
anymore quite frankly because I think most Republicans
are very, very, very uncomfortable with everything that's
happening. I'm seeing it every single day, everyone
I talk to.
And d g DD, excuse me, geopolitics
reports The USA is
it reports that Eric Trump's investing in low
cost per kill drone company
that's created by Israel,
or rather an Israeli company, which if you
understand the way they work, it's the same
thing. And I don't mean that as a
hyperbolic point. Quite literally, they create companies
as x in in military to promote the
Israeli military and intelligence agendas. They publicly made
this clear in, like, 15 different interviews, but
it's racist when you point it out, though.
And and, I mean, I could play that
clip yet again on sixty Minutes where they
say we create fake companies to affect the
supply chain, but I'm still racist when I
say it, though, because that's how perfectly accurate
all this is today. Realize, as gee they
write, The US is depraved,
and the president's son is taking an Israeli
company public that advertises
low cost per kill. Now so many things
you could bring into this. My direction, outside
of the absurdity of that in every way
with the world is with what we're living
through, that you're talking about an Israeli company,
a company
a a country, a government, an intelligence apparatus
that has been continually, right up until moments
ago, caught spying on Americans,
caught spying on the White House.
And you're the son of the president is
gonna work with an Israeli company tied to
intelligence? Because it is, though. Not an opinion.
Directly tied to Israeli intelligence. Unit eighty two.
I mean, it's a joke, isn't it?
Back backed by Trump's son, in case you
were thinking we only go off a tweet,
which we never ever ever ever ever ever
do, but we always show what we see
first and it happens to be a lot
of the flow through this platform. Backed by
Trump's son who's barely founded AI drone startup
plans to go public
on Nasdaq.
So the white the Trump the Trump family,
while he's in the presidency, is rolling out
an Israeli intelligence drone company,
and they're I mean, we're rolling it out
as that they're the ones producing I mean,
it's just this is just I don't I
I have to laugh at this point, guys.
Genuinely.
Now don't forget, this is from, we we
pointed this back, I believe it was right
after this, sometime in September. This is from
2025.
The gray zone. Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding
offer. We we covered all that extensively. You
remember this. This is a good one to
brush up on if you forgot how clear
it was that Charlie Kirk was very be
becoming alarmingly aware of the Zionism problem in
this country and the push to bomb Iran.
And that's why all of a sudden everybody
turned on him and Trump got mad at
him and all of a sudden the Zionist
funders started pushing him away. And if you
understand the way this went, clearly,
they were extremely unhappy and extremely worried about
what he was doing. You know, and then
completely unconnected. He later died right after
that. You can decide how that worked out.
A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie
Kirk tells the Gray Zone how the assassinated
conservative leaders' turning point on Israeli influence
provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu's allies that
left him angry and afraid. Now there's so
much in this article that's worth your time.
The point I wanna reiterate
oh, don't forget. Remember, this is also Tucker,
at Turning Point where he talked about all
this and it made everyone freaked out. And,
you know, half the time, you I feel
like this stuff is coordinated. I mean, you
should consider that. But it said according to
Kirk's longtime friend, Kirk's resentment of Netanyahu and
the Israel lobby, that's Zionism, so we understand
it, was spreading within Trump's inner circle. So
on top of everything else, it wasn't just
the awareness within the Turning Point community, which
is that's that cat's out of the bag
about what Israel's doing to this country and
Zionism.
It's also about the fact that within Trump's
inner circle, this mindset was beginning to blossom.
I mean, if you understand the actual network
we're discussing that's in that's above the nation
state conversation, read Whitney's books, you'll understand
that this represented a blossoming
awareness to, like, the the kryptonite of what
this was. So if you wanted to try
to wrap your mind around why, hypothetically, this
might have been done to silence Charlie Kirk,
there's your answer. It says, in fact, they
said, the president himself was terrified of Netanyahu's
wrath, which he has essentially admitted not stating
it like that, but more than once, that's
come out. I mean, there was a recent
post we were just talking about. But in
any case, the point is, Anne feared the
consequences of defying him.
That's Trump and Netanyahu, mind you. During the
past year, the Trump insider was told by
contacts in the White House that the Secret
Service had caught Israeli government personnel placing electric
devices on its emergency response vehicles on two,
mind you, two separate occasions.
Now that's a report from somebody that we
can't verify, but let's realize we already know
this has been going on.
This is oh, let for I I guess
I had this out of order. Israel accused
of planting mysterious spy devices in the White
House. Guys, that was 2020 or 2019.
Under funny how during Trump's administration, but let's
be clear, it's completely just it's not partisan.
It was, I guarantee, happening in every other
administration. My point is for whatever reason, it
it seems to be to a degree that's
almost impossible to miss during Trump's administration, but
I think that kinda makes sense.
I do I think so anyway. But so
you both times. So on top of all
that,
of of his son working with a company
that's gonna be doing the same things to
them or all the Palantir's, all the surveillance
and everything right now, Israel just literally is,
like, you might as well like, every I
don't even know how to make this sound
the right way. With all the surveillance and
Israel's investment and what they're doing, I mean,
it might as well just be some kind
of I don't know. So so the point
is Israel has access to all of our
information. I was trying to make it say
sound in a funny way, but the bottom
line is they have access to AI,
the partnership, all of our biometrics, all of
our personal data. I mean, the data that
goes beyond what we're saying online. The like,
the hard cold reactionary data of what we
do and what we spend money on and
what our medical decisions are. All of it.
Again, I've said that so many times, and
I feel like it still doesn't sink in
for people. Like, it's not hyperbolic. That's the
truth. With what they're doing in the world
and how they're coming after Americans for opinions,
that's gotta be insanely alarming.
I mean, it is.
But the point where was I on this?
The oh, yeah. So, you know, the idea
being that they are putting spy devices all
over the place. On top of that, let's
not forget the interesting point that overlaps with
that, which is that Trump was given a
special pager gift from Netanyahu.
Trump received morbid gift from Israel's prime minister.
You know, that was the pager attack where
they killed mostly women and children, and yet
the entirety of the western apparatus was like,
you know, what a what a savvy act.
How how look how smart they were to
kill all those women and children who had
nothing to do with what's going you know,
or let pagers circulate a civilian population for
five years and act like that wasn't complete
terrorism.
Again, it shows you beyond a question
that the media was willing to lie about
that as they then clutch their pearls at
a hypothetical allegation about Russia. You know, it's
just you can't miss this stuff. That's what
it is. Remember, this is in Trump's office,
by the way. You don't think that's listening
to Trump every single day? I bet you
I bet you that's something they probably even
know of. That's just all my opinion.
Now as even Ron Paul says,
why is a US senator from South Carolina
going to Israel every two weeks?
That's Lindsey Graham. Lindsey Graham said in a
speech from Israel that if Iran ends up
hitting US troops in the region, it's worth
the risk of attempting regime change. They're clearly
working for another power. Ron Paul and plenty
of others are calling this out and have
been for a while, in fact.
Top of that, drop site news, the Israeli
government installed and maintained security system at Epstein
Apartment.
We go through this more in-depth in a
future show, but the point was just to
connect this to Epstein. Security equipment and alarms
were installed by the Israeli government and a
notorious Manhattan residence, you know, in The United
States, frequented by Ehud Barak, a former prime
minister now. And
the I mean, there's so it it it
has to show you, and I I I
always wanna go through, like, all the same
clips because maybe you are new and haven't
seen them. But, you know, from Wilkerson, Pentagon,
and all the same stuff, it's so many
examples that this is not just some kind
of side small thing. This is being allowed.
And I'm talking about the government overlap, the
connection to Trump or to the inner circle
of Palantir or the, you know, the Silicon
Valley or Techno, every part of what we're
dealing with. Every single part of this administration,
but also others. But it's important because we're
here now, From Lutnick to Gates to everybody
tied to this administration are directly implicated in
all of this, and now they're trying to
tell you to move on.
So Derek put out an excellent article that's
relevant for today, Les Wexner's Very Bad Week,
Billionaire Face to Testify about Epstein and OSU
Sexual Abuse Scandal. So I wanna read you
some parts of this, then we're gonna get
into this an Epstein Epstein connection and finish
with the two main parts we discussed. Now
this,
I mean, think about trying to tell us
all that there's nothing here, that we need
to move on. It's all conspiracy.
There's nothing actionable,
and yet there's people already being arrested in
other countries. There's people who have been like,
major
resignations, which is not enough for me, but
at least it's something. And And on top
of that, you now have Wexner being deposed
and Jim Jordan apparently being subpoenaed as well.
Doesn't get as much attention, but interesting, the
point is that that's how are you gonna
pretend that means there's nothing there?
I mean, I I wanna show you some
points as we go through this Even like,
I like, for example, even on Infowars, you
have Harrison Smith making points that I think
are some you know, okay. That's a good
point. And at the same time, though, pulling
punches where it matters about Trump.
Because you if anyone out there right now
is pretending like there's nothing to see about
Trump as he tells you I've completely exonerated,
they're lying to you or they're stupid. Because
it's very clear that and we've proven at
least two of them have not been investigated.
The one I'm talking about in regards to
the court affidavit signed under threat of per
threat of purges excuse me. Threat of perjury
by multiple people
that talks about Trump raping, Trump, you know,
and and multiple others. And I've never claimed
that was absolute proof. It's simply an allegation,
but it's signed in court, meaning they could
have gone to jail for it. And as
far as I can tell, it was never
investigated. We have the Zorro Ranch point
that no and, well, technically, that one's more
about Epstein, but there's many of these in
regard to things you can prove they have
not investigated,
which opens up the question to everything. If
they never followed up on these major claims,
why would we think they followed up on
the ones about Trump raping a 13 year
old or whatever else? The question is or
the point is we need these thing things
to be proven. And if we can already
catch them in lies, then it's pretty clear
they're covering something up. We'll come back to
that, though. The point here is that there's
clearly something going on
well beyond just a bunch of old tips
that they researched and found out were nothing,
and now everyone's act jumping at shadows. That's
not what's happening. I think that's the way
they set this up to be to look.
As we talked about, they've been what they've
been doing all this time was carefully creating
this kind of subjective illusion, but they clearly
also screwed up because they're morons, apparently, and
didn't redact that or forgot this or included
that on accident. And it is blowing up
in their face. But I'm convinced this was
about trying to create this to let people
like, you know, they have a low opinion
of us, all of us. They think we're
all what they've created as this illusion,
the dumb conspiracy theorists in our mother's basements
or whatever. Right? So even though they made
that up knowing they were trying to suppress
people like us, as I keep showing, it's,
like, become the way they see,
like, the lower rung people, I think. And
so my point is they then engage with
us like that's what we are. So they
throw this low hanging fruit and expect all
of us to go, oh. Well, only the
only the the people that you typically do
that in the mainstream alternative did that, so
you tricked your own people. I mean, the
reality clearly is that there is something going
on here, and they want you to think
there wasn't. And I think that's gone.
The question is what Trump does next.
I mean, we're gonna get to that in
his special meetings about he's trying desperately to
act like this is all beyond him. It's
not. So back to Wexner.
American billionaire Les Wexner testifies today, which I
do is I believe is either already done
or somewhere in the middle,
and on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and
faces deposition in Ohio State University sexual abuse
lawsuit, which goes back before this. And this
guy I mean, it's it's like a lot
of these people. Like like Luke Brudell before,
you know, in in the past when he
was still around in the conversation. The point
is that there was a lot flying around
from I mean, all sorts of or even
better yet, David Hamblin from term Derek's discussion.
There's so the evidence is un I've never
even seen a case that's so from family
members, from, you know, people that have followed
it up and backed it up and other
police investigations, and yet still,
it just gets pushed away like it's completely
subjective. It's what they're doing with all this
today.
So this and the Ohio State conversation and
all the other parts of it have been
there, and people have chosen to ignore it.
Now Wexner is the founder of retail giant,
L Brands Incorporated,
now known as and think think about this.
With what these are people are being implicated
with or all the things Epstein's tied to
or Trump and his beauty pageants. Like, it's
weird to me.
Wexner, no is,
l brands, also known as Bath and Body
Works, former owner of Victoria's Secret, Abercrombie and
Fitch, Lane Bryant, the unlimited.
Like, like, trying to draw in, like, these
these teen,
pubescent, like, just weird. Right? Like, I mean,
that's what most of those are sort of
known for, at least some of them anyway.
It's just kinda creepy to think about these
people getting involved in this kind of level
of business and the people that the models
they worked with. It's, you know, unnerving.
Wexner was originally slated to testify on Wednesday
at 10AM before the House Committee on over
and oversight on oversight and government reform
at the Rayburn House built House office building
on the Capitol Hill in Washington. However,
in recent days, because he's apparently an elitist
or what they call an elite,
it was reported that members of congress would
now travel to New Albany, Ohio, apparently, to
depose Wexner about his connections to Epstein.
The change was first reported by the dispatch.
A congressional spokesperson declined to answer questions from
the dispatch regarding
why not travel to DC.
While Wexner's relationship with with Epstein has been
extensively documented, Wexner, his wife Abigail, and the
Wexner Foundation had previously claimed Epstein had no
contact with the foundation staff
after September 2007. However, in December, the last
American Vagabond reported that Epstein's leaked Yahoo emails
show he was regularly consulted for approval and
advice on financial transactions even after he was
exposed. Why doesn't that change anything?
Litnick,
I never did that. Oops. Yes. I did.
I was lying. No big deal. Let's all
move forward.
Elon Musk, I never gave him a tour
of the facility. Oh, yep. I did. I
was lying. Or every other part of this.
Now you can still argue that doesn't prove
they raped children or committed a crime, but
it shows you they've been desperately lying to
you. Same thing with Trump and all of
this. You guys, you can act all day.
It's embarrassing for you, but you can act
all day long. Like, he's so transparent, and
he did
But to do that, you have to ignore
the last six months of just desperate effort
to try not to let this happen.
See, an honest person is not gonna go,
oh, you see how he tried not to
let him out, but then eventually got forced
to let him out, and now he did,
and so we can go, he did it.
No. No. No. We did it, or Massey
did it, or whatever else. They did everything
they could to not let it happen, or
at least that's what it appears to be.
So in this case, Wexner is one of
them. Lied, got caught, nothing happens. On a
on 02/11/2026,
representative Massey
questioned US attorney general Pam Bondi on why
the DOJ had redacted Wexner's name in at
least one of the files. Now remember, the
important point here, and it's so same thing.
They set this up so they would have
their talking point.
Where she goes, well, we were it's only
one out of 250.
Come on, man. You're just making a big
nothing out of it. Well, no. It was
the only one that mentioned him as a
coconspirator
in the ones that they said. That's the
point.
So the rest, it's like Wexner in an
email. I'm talking about where we're gonna meet
up. Here's one where they go, this is
a coconspirator
in the case of these sexual traffic crimes,
and his name is there.
So for her to act like that's the
same it's equivalent, it either again shows you
how stupid she is or how dishonest she
is. You can decide.
So
they covered it up. Got caught in real
time, and it didn't even blip. Nothing even
didn't even shift.
And it says, Massey also asked why Wexner
was not prosecuted despite some documents labeling him
as a co conspirator.
At what point did the FBI and DOJ
decide that Les Wexner is not a coconspirator?
He asks. Because our Epstein Files Transparency Act
requires you to release the internal decision about
whether to prosecute him or not, and it's
not in the files.
It's not in the files for any of
these other men. On top of that, by
the way, which, again, we're now, what, weeks
past it, nothing has happened, which continues to
make me feel like all this is a
big show, is the fact that they've been
caught withholding their conversations,
Bondi and Kash Patel and others.
That was absolutely part of the act the
act. It's it's right in there as he's
citing for this case. Because in this case,
it cites they are required to include their
deliberations about these decisions.
But in the same way, it's listed that
they're required to include, which is kinda the
same point, their conversations. There's not a single
one in there.
That's a provable reality, guys, because they had
to have done but they're not, and they're
lying. They got caught.
No one even cared. I don't even see
if I was somebody should be up there
going, This is right now a provable reality
of a crime.
They did this. We can prove it. Somebody
do something. Who knows? Maybe it'll happen down
the line. Maybe it's too much going on.
But I'm just so exhausted by how often
we see things left and right, no one's
ever held accountable. Who's been arrested for Epstein
in January 6 and Social Security numbers and
whatever you wanna go back as far as
you wanna go back for, or Trump, for
example, or anybody. You get a lot of
action, a lot of movement and claims and
court processes
that nothing ultimately happens.
You could make that of what you will.
It is a fact.
And it continues at the bottom. Epstein continued,
you and I and this is Epstein writing
to Wexner.
You and I had, quote, gang stuff, whatever
that means. I mean, it's pretty clear what
it means, but what does his what does
he mean it as? Right? For over fifteen
years, they had gang stuff. And this is
a great deal of it
that was that she was aware of. I
had no intention of divulging any intention
of divulging any confidence of ours no matter
what accusations she made, and she made quite
a few. Yeah. Sure. Sounds like they didn't
really know each other. Right?
Gang stuff for fifteen years, a great deal
of it. That's from somebody telling you that
they didn't have converse I mean, these people
are covering them covering up their crimes.
And, by the way, to jump to the
end, he he came out today going, I
was conned by Epstein. I was tricked.
And that's probably gonna fly because people who
are around him holding him accountable are probably
also in those files.
Wessner is a prominent donor to an Israeli
to Israeli causes, by the way, and has
numerous connections to powerful Israelis and Jewish financiers.
In these it it is these connections that
some researchers believe may be another source of
Jeffrey Epstein's potential relationships with intelligence
networks.
Oh, that's right. And I'm just gonna I
wanna read the the bottom line part or
the bottom part of this is Wexner's Israeli
and potential mafia connections. Now Whitney's written a
lot about the mega group and the bigger
connections, the mafia connections, the Israeli government connections,
Jewish,
elitist connections.
And it's important to understand that, which if
you want more on that in particular, there's
links right here, but Whitney's work is powerful.
The the the links to most of them
right here, you can check them out. But
go to the limited hangout. There's lots of
it on it. Now continuing, Wexner is considered
to be one of the most prominent Jewish
philanthropists.
One of these efforts included organizing what was
sometimes known as the study group, but more
commonly known as the mega group. The Wall
Street Journal reported in 1998
that the mega group was a group of
this is a quote, a group of elite
Jewish philanthropists
that was, quote, formed in 1991
and developed as an effort to conduct a
high minded philanthropic
discussion
about the pressing issues of the Jewish people.
The mega group has been accused of being
a front for Israeli intelligence. Surprise, surprise.
The relationship between Epstein and Wexner has been
explored extensively,
both in Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail
and the mainstream press. In 1986,
Epstein was introduced to Wexner by a Robert
Meister,
an insurance executive who provided insurance for Wexner's
clothing company, the Limited.
It was Meister's wife, Wendy, who introduced Wes
Wexner
to his future wife, Abigail Koppler. Koppler was
a young Israeli American attorney with her own
connections to the state of Israel. Her father,
Yehuda Kapel, was a former commander and a
special operations unit of the Hag Haganah.
Now I'm not gonna go into depth, but
that is alarming when you understand what they're
what they're responsible for, what that connects to.
I mean and then, as he writes, the
main Zionist paramount paramilitary organization,
comprised of various militias that united behind the
ostensible
cause of Zionism, establishing a Jewish homeland. Ostensible
meaning that's not what it actually is, but
that's what they claim. And there's a video
in there you can watch. It's one of
the good ones I think are important.
I'll actually include it for you. It's a
longer one though. It's,
seven minutes.
I just it's just this is the title
of the video was This is Zionism, and
it's a rabbi telling you exactly what Zionism
is, and it's not what they're saying. I
mean, Who else? Maybe we can play it
at the end if we got time. Let's
see.
So the Haganah I mean, here's a good
example. In the beginning of octo the post
October 7 conversation, remember that that elderly actually,
Actually, I think I might be able to
get it right here. Hold on.
Yeah. Right here. Perfect. I'm so surprised it
still pops up. This guy right here.
This elderly guy.
See that guy? He's you know, where he
basically to to do it really quickly, he
basically said kill them all.
So right here, he says, every Jew with
a weapon should go and kill them all.
If you're an Arab neighbor, don't wait. Go
to his home and shoot him. That was
promoted by the Israeli military guys, And he
they he was driven out there to speak
to the IDF.
He is a representation of the Haganah Lehi,
like, origin points of these groups, guys. That's
why they brought him out.
Disgusting.
And as Dan writes,
Ezra Yatchen was a member of the Lehi,
the Zionist the Zionist terrorist group that twice
attempted to ally with Nazi Germany, very easy
to look up, and sought to found a
copycat fascist state. In January
1941,
vice admiral
Ralph von der Marwitz, the German naval attache
in Turkey, filed a report conveying an offer
to Lehi to, quote, actively take part in
the war on Germany's side in return for
German support. I mean, this is you could
look this up on Wikipedia for crying out
loud, and he has it right here from
Haaretz.
It's amazing how much people don't know. Zionist
militias' effort to recruit Nazis and fight against
British are revealed. That's Haaretz, the leading Israeli
newspaper. The point in saying all of this
is that the group that he's connected to
through her is
the most alarming aspect or one of them.
Look. Feel feel feel free to look into
the Haganah and what they're responsible for. Now
it says the Haganah would ultimately be dissolved
in 1948 and become the official army of
the State Of Israel.
That's exactly the point. Yehuda Kapal was a
key player in the founding of Israel's military
intelligence network. Drop site news reports that in
his diary,
David,
David Ben Gurion Gurion, Israel's founding father, who,
as I understand it, was also a nonsecular
borderline atheist,
notes that Koppel serves in, S. H. A.
I. Or Shai Haganah's intelligence arm and the
processor to Israel's central military intelligence director, Amman.
In In another example of the extensive relationship
between Epstein and Les Wexner, it was Epstein
who drafted the prenuptial
agreement for Les and Abigail ahead of their
marriage in 1993,
but we didn't know each other. Rumors of
mafia connections have also hung over Wexner's head
for two decades.
The rumors stem from the 1985 murder of
attorney Arthur Shapiro. The murder was described as
a mob style slaying
and immediately set off an investigation by the
Columbus Police Department. The day after Shapiro's body
was found,
the Columbus Dispatch reported that he had been
under investigation by the IRS.
The Dispatch quoted unnamed sources as saying Shapiro
had not filed an income tax in seven
years and that federal prosecutors were preparing to
take the case to the grand jury.
The murder remains unsolved to this very day.
The main suspect was a man named Barry
Kessler. He was found guilty in at least
one other murder for hire plot and sentenced
to death, but never admitted to the killing
of Arthur Shapiro.
By 1991, the Columbus Police Department's organized crime
bureau had researched and written a report on
the Shapiro murder. The report, titled Shapiro's homicide
investigation analysis and hypothesis,
was not initially made public, but later became
known after it was revealed that Columbus police
chief James g Jackson had ordered its destruction.
Jackson was temporarily suspended for his actions. Despite
the efforts to destroy the so called Shapiro
file, the independent media outlet, The Columbus Free
Press, released it in full, link right there,
in late nineteen nineties. Though the report was
described as having unsubstantiated
allegations, it specifically
names Les Wexner and his businesses as having
relationships with individuals believed to be associated with
organized crime families.
The report notes that Arthur Shapiro had been
a partner
in the law firm of Schwartz, Shapiro, Kellman,
Warren, which represented Wexner's company, The Limited. And
that prior to his death, Arthur Shapiro managed
his account this account for the law firm.
Wexner also had several other connections with individuals
linked to organized crime families. The report concludes,
thus, it can be determined that Les Wexner,
through the limited, is associated with at least
two organized crime figures who are associated with
the Pittsburgh crime family.
They also state from the pre, the predicate
facts presented, it appears that Les Wexner had
established
contact with associates reputed to be organized crime
figures. One, it was a major investment partner
and one and and another was using the
limited headquarters as a mailing address. It's not
known whether there are other such figures among
Wexner's associates, but it can be hypothesized that
the, Genovese LaRocca crime families might consider Wexner
a friend. The report argues Shapiro may have
had incriminating information on a number of powerful
individuals and might have been forced to answer
questions in his impending grand jury hearing.
Les Wexner has repeatedly denied any knowledge of
the spirit of murder. Now if you understand,
like, for example, what Whitney highlights in her
books, there's a there's an undeniable
overlap with the mob scene at this time
with with a Jewish mob element, which then
overlaps directly with the Israel connection and all
the rest we're talking about. So, they should
support and understand that that is a relevant
part to this connection, which does tie back
to this larger conversation, especially knowing that his
wife, set up by Epstein, was essentially
connected right back to the Israeli government.
Now the update, Wexner's official statement to the
House Committee on Oversight, it links there for
the full statement,
never saw or heard about Epstein being in
the company of a minor girl. To the
contrary, he led me to believe he was
in a serious long term relationship with two
women and, you know, just and basically, I
was conned was the central point going around
today.
So to me,
you know, I visited this island only once.
You know, I don't know how much it
can be taken from somebody who's been accused
of this much, you can see is involved
with a lot to come out now of
all times after lying about even knowing him
and connecting to him, or for the most
part, now coming out and going, okay. Fine.
Fine. Fine. I was tricked. It's like, well,
okay. A little late for that, but here's
the post if you wanna see it for
yourself.
So Wexner
is tied into all of this, which ties
directly to I mean, through all of the
same network we're discussing. Clearly, Epstein was a
central part of this, but it's not Epstein
that was the one controlling this. That's the
important part. He was a piece in this
game.
I'll include this for you.
So on the Epstein points that connect to
all of this in general, here is, what
was it? Representative
Dave Minn
coming out of the Lex Wexner hearing
and announcing something that actually surprised me too.
Very frustrating the fact that there are no
Republicans here today.
I wish there were Republicans because
sex trafficking should not be a d versus
r issue. It should be a bipartisan issue.
Everybody should be invested in finding the truth
right now. And the fact that we've had
so little cooperation
from the Republicans on the house oversight committee
that the DOJ has actively tried to obstruct
this investigation.
That is shameful, and it will go down
as a permanent mark on the records of
people like Pam Bondi and Donald Trump.
Yep. I mean, I'm not gonna pretend for
one second that I believe that he's genuine.
I mean, it could be
just as likely as anything else. I mean,
maybe he's not a part, but the point
is that people like this from the left
right paradigm will come out when it's in
their interest and go, they did the bad
thing and just as likely are involved. My
point is just consider that. Don't blindly assume
it. Don't deny it, but consider it because
it's certainly possible with how deep this goes.
None nonetheless, that all aside, I'm actually kinda
surprised. I mean, I don't know if it's
why it would be required or even expected
that they would all flock to this this
deposition, but that did kind of become the
expectation, and
Massey and the rest aren't there. Now you
could take that for what what you what
what take it for, you know, what you
wanna take it for. But it's interesting.
But as it plays out,
it's what follows that makes the most
impact to me. Right? Being there and saying
this out loud,
if followed by nothing,
means pretty much nothing. Right? But if you
see action continue, then it will mean more.
But, for example, if Massey and the rest
come around and go after Wexner or whatever
else, then it, you know, it becomes sort
of irrelevant whether they were there at the
hearing. But it's worth noting to see what
comes next. Right?
Because, you know, it could imply that they
don't really care the way they say they
claim they do. Right? And there's a lot
of us worried about this from an all
of government perspective, which we should.
It I mean, it's what we've seen
in pretty much every example in our history,
like, of The United States. Like, this continually
shown to us. And, I mean, like, these
big examples throughout our existence where you have
these moments and you look back and you
find that there was far more involvement or
that they weren't really you know, that we're
being played. They were there there's a political
manipulation or a psychological operation or a false
flag. You know, whatever we deal with, guys,
it's very, very rampant in our history.
Now Gunther Eaglin, of course, post Jim Jordan
just confirmed that DOJ is zeroing in on
more
Minnesota fraud.
Funny timing for that, Well, wait a minute.
I thought you guys were telling us before
that it was all absolute and it was
there. Like, what's so what's been happening over
the last couple months?
Now you're zeroing in? What's the evidence? What
are we talking about? Did Nick Shirley find
out? No. He just asked things in front
of a camera on in in front of
a door, and everyone, oh my god. It's
everywhere. Even though, again, there was crime. There
was fraud. And I'll make that point after
this clip. I I just think it's interesting
of all this for these people who are
now acting like Epstein who? What do you
mean? Gunther doesn't even know who he is
anymore. Right? It's now going, look over there.
Look over there. Now remember, Jim Jordan was
subpoenaed in this in this conversation with Les
Westerner. So I just kinda put that out
there and say maybe this is why he's
trying to draw attention to this. Either way,
here's what he said.
What describing would be a crime,
but we're not hearing about people, you know,
getting arrested in all of this. So you're
building the case. Next steps. Right. Right. Just
to start out, except that's what's supposedly already
been going on this whole time. So now
starting today, we're next building the case. Okay.
What's been going on this whole time? Let's
remember, guys. This case goes back to Biden
administration before.
And, well, here here's what he says next,
and I'll make this point.
Yeah. I think so. And and understand there
have already been, like, 60 some people indicted.
Some have already been charged and convicted are
in in jail waiting for their sentence. So
I know there's, like, a few folks with
that feeding our future program and some others
who are in that in that situation. Mhmm.
So it is happening,
but we need more focus and I think
Oh, it is happening. Oh, you mean happened
in the past sense? You mean Jim Jordan?
You mean under Biden's administration?
Yes. Because it's easy to prove, and I
already talked about this.
Now what he just did right there was
not by accident. That was clearly it's
believed that we're arresting people right now.
That's that was a very dishonest way to
frame that because these all the 74, if
I remember correctly,
were were during Biden's administration. Now I'm not
saying that's a Biden good, them bad. It's
just a fact. The point is that if
you're gonna try to make a case about
who's doing something and who's not, you have
to be acknowledging the facts, which are 74
people, if I remember correctly, it's off the
top of my head, indicted, many of them
arrested and actually charged with those crimes
during Biden's administration,
specifically around fraud in this exact conversation.
And so how in the world can they
make it about them covering this up when
what happens is now we have Nick Shirley
having a weird video in front of a
daycare going, misproves everything, and it never did.
No one's ever really proven what they were
talking about. Again, not to say there's not
fraud in that exact way. It just means
that whatever they did with that weird little
Nick Shirley thing was trying
to rehash this story that was already ongoing,
that had already been engaged with as if
it was new.
And it worked for a lot of very
simple minded people. And they all rushed out
there and made this big case. And at
the end of the day, who have they
arrested? Ask Croc if you want. The last
time I checked, there hasn't been anybody in
this new part of it. They reference the
old ones and act like we're ongoing.
It's a game. And this is I mean,
I want crime crime to be I mean,
if somebody is, in fact, defrauding Americans, which
it is happening in plenty of ways on
all sides of our paradigm, then they should
be held accountable for it. But if all
they're doing is pointing to something to keep
you focusing on something that never comes to
pass, at some point, you gotta be able
to stand back and go, okay. But how
about something happens?
They they do this and they go, oh,
we're gonna go after Pelosi.
Obama's going down. And then you you look
over there and you miss the thing happening
right now. My point is, another week goes
by, another month, another year. And instead of
being distracted by the new claim, go what
about that claim? Obama, please, Pelosi, anybody.
So you guys know this, though. Again, I'm
saying this just to make the point. I
think most of you are well past that.
It's it's frustrating. Is it not?
Situation. So it is happening,
but we need more focus. And I think
as the speaker mentioned, it needs to be
a focus nationwide.
Where is this also happening? Not, you know,
not just in Minneapolis, but where else is
this? Yeah. Right? Isn't it a a bit
weird that you guys over focus in this
one specific politically advantageous location? Yes. And and
then do nothing about it? Yes.
It's not about what they're claiming, guys. It's
just not. And and the truth is there's
fraud all over the place, and most of
it being conducted by the you guys right
there. What's going on? Well and if any
of that money went to ISIS, Al Shabaab,
and we know that the choke hold that
they had on some of the young people
who had you know, whose families had migrated
here years ago from Somalia, we remember those
cases,
of those young men who had tried to
join ISIS and were radicalized. So that money,
it's a big job. Right. Right. Let's just
throw in a completely hypothetical basis. You know,
if maybe it did this and that, it
would be crazy. Great journalism, guys. Let's just
I mean, think about what they're saying right
there. If it could have possibly been connected
because we claim Somalis fund al Shabaab, which
we claim is ISIS, even though the US
government created and funded and works with ISIS
and Al Qaeda and al Shabaab was created
by the US government's intervention in Somalia, who
cares about the facts, guys? Let's just talk
nonsense and hypotheticals because that's mainstream alternative media
today. Or excuse me, mainstream.
They're the same thing.
I mean, it it really is infuriating, isn't
it? How stupid and dumbed down all of
this has be has gotten?
Jim Jordan is trying to make it sound
as if they've done something there. Now the
real point for me is that this is
about them going more over there when nothing
else nothing has happened. What do you mean
more?
What has happened thus far? What he pointed
to was in Biden's administration. So, guys, if
you can't see by now that they're just
kinda shuffling things around to get you distracted,
I don't know what you're looking at. But,
again, I'm of the mind that most of
you are well beyond that. Now here is
Art Vandeley. I love the name, but this
is a ridiculous comment he makes here. Now
first of all, Nancy Mace,
I believe,
is playing the kind of counterbalance right now.
I think Nancy Mace is clearly a Trump
loyalist kind of position based on what she's
already been doing. And now she's sort of
pay playing this like Epstein files counterbalance.
It's, again, about follow through. What do they
do over the next six months? Not just
what they yell in the moment. It's easy
to yell the thing that makes you look
like you care. It's hard to care and
hard to follow through with that. At the
end of the day, right now, I think
she's trying to play that because they know
that people are unhappy with the Republican party,
and this is sort of a you know,
maybe this can carry that through. She says,
today, I wrote to the CIA to release
all Jeffrey Epstein files of Congress. Oh, great.
Good job. Good job. Where were you
every other year before this, which is the
same point we made about all of them,
left or right? Why didn't you care during
Trump's last administration? Why didn't you care during
Biden's administration? Now it's all about political momentum.
But either way, what do you mean you
broke to the CIA to release all the
files? Isn't that what's already going on? Why
why is Nancy Mace going, please do this,
gonna do anything?
We're asking for all the documents, all the
images. She just knows this is what people
wanna hear. That's what I think. But I
may let's hope it go I mean, stay
good. Let's see it. But understand that, just
like Marguerite Teller Green, I don't think there's
a true, genuine motive here or intention.
I believe in in Epstein was
intel.
Pedophile, sex traffickers, he's just trying to lean
into what people are saying, whether true or
not. Now Art Vanderlay says Nancy follows me,
so maybe she'll see this.
I'm asking politely for our elected officials to
stop this madness.
It's over.
MAGA influencers
lied to their audience for years about this
crap. You realize he's saying this with what
we can see. Now, I wanna say one
thing before I read further. You guys know
me. You watch this show. I more than
anything, the last thing I would ever ask
is for you to trust me, believe me,
question me, check the source material, challenge my
mindset on these things. Hopefully,
we collectively come to something new.
But my point is that you know me
enough to know that I'm not partisan, I'm
not leaning into one side or the other,
I loathe the left right paradigm. I think
it it it bothers me how much influence
it still has even as everyone seems to
see through it. I'm saying all of that
for you to recognize
that
well, oh, I that's really frustrating.
My mind it's it's just to be honest,
I was looking at the
that's George Costanza from Seinfeld, and it's just
making me laugh, and it totally distracted me.
Anyway, the point I was making,
I'm it says, I'm asking politely for our
elected officials to stop this madness. It's over.
MAGA influencers lied to their audience for years
about this crap. Oh, okay. That was just
the general point. I'm glad I didn't lose
that. That, you know, so you guys know
me enough to know not partisan and so
on. That we're I'm talking about these files
in this one point. Epstein files, whatever we're
discussing.
What I'm trying to relay to you is
to to to is when I'm pointing at
these things and I say this is something
that matters, I'm I mean, I shouldn't even
need to say that. You guys know that
I believe these things are relevant,
not just because, oh my god, it might
mean something. Or, oh, I hate Trump. Look,
and he found his name in there. Let's
hype this. Or like I said in the
beginning, a lot of this stuff was subjective
and is absolutely
might mean nothing.
But what I'm trying to show you is
that I think it's important that we see
that there is, regardless of statements like this,
actionable information that's already there, without question.
And that they've chosen to ignore it, like
the sore ranch point. Now there's plenty more
than that, showing you that people are lying,
showing you connections that are in, in and
of themselves something that should be done, you
know, in connections between foreign intelligence, can to
our government, any number of things. So when
they people come out and say that there's
nothing we were lied to, they either are,
I guess, being manipulated by that sentiment from
the media that they think they're supposed to
listen to, or they're trying to lie to
you for for pretty nefarious reasons.
But, I mean, what do you think? I
mean, do you do you think that what
we're looking at with all this information and
all that we've already known added to this
is just some hypothetical
guess?
I mean, there's a big difference, by the
way, between having things that we think based
on evidence and then things that we actually
see demand action.
And I believe that is what we have
in this right now.
That's why they keep lying. That's why they
keep trying to shuffle things around. That's why
people in other places of the world are,
in fact, going to jail.
I just think that's important to stress, guys,
because these people are starting to win certain
people over. This is my point in the
past about people who listen to people who
they think are smart. You know? People who
might actually be book smart, who convince themselves
that I do what smart people do. Right?
They get played by the system. Well, this
guy this guy is an engineer or whatever.
He knows it. And they kinda fall in
those traps without realizing that just because you're
an intelligent person does not mean you have
the,
I guess, even just the wherewithal, like, the
the ability to see around the manipulations that
play everybody.
There's a very different thing in there. That's
why people who get step into this conversation,
conspiracy theory, and otherwise, it takes a like,
COVID nineteen, we saw a lot of that.
We saw these doctors who suddenly went, oh
my god. This This entire industry is full
of lies and manipulations, and then it took
them years to fully grasp everything else. And
they're still going through that journey like we
all are. Anyway, I I digress. The point
is just to realize, guys, there's so much
here. This is not an abstraction. This is
not some kind of a a hype story
just because of partisanship.
This is real, and it goes well back
beyond
I mean,
you could argue that this kind of thing
goes back to some basically, the beginning of
this country.
And I don't mean that in the sense
of, like,
day one, but that they're from a very
long time ago, we've been dealing with some
some form of what we're talking about today.
Anyway, so and then it says. So first,
just saying MAGA influencers lie to their audiences.
And then MAGA friendly politicians
like Nancy Mace took the cheese. And just
like they've done with any number of BS
conspiracy theories.
Like, what though? I'd love to hear what
he thinks of the BS conspiracy theories. There
are there are plenty of them out there,
for sure.
He says, you know what happens when you
constantly feed people conspiracies? They end up not
believing in anything. Now, there's there's a valid
point to be made in that. But, you
see, what I would point to is the
people he's probably listening to, the mainstream alternative
media. And I'm not not because I disagree,
but because I can prove to you they're
wrong and lying.
Because if you constantly give people the false
information,
like the the false construct on top of
the Somali story or the I mean, any
number of examples about Venezuela or or I
mean, you could go down the list for
the last year alone and find hundreds of
examples of them pushing lies that we can
prove are lies that he probably agreed with.
But then people come out with this kind
of story because it's counter to what the
team wants, and that's the false story. But
he may even believe that.
So the point is the same, and I
agree with it. They end up believing in
nothing if you constantly push false information. I
just believe he's on the wrong side of
that point. But maybe he's dishonest. It says
where are the arrests? Where are the indictments?
Where are the convictions?
And where is the list?
That's what we should be saying.
He says, There is no list.
There was never a list.
Neither Epstein nor Maxwell were charged with trafficking
anyone
to any person other than Epstein. So we
have to really address how stupid this is.
I I mean, guys, let's be clear, first
of all, that that's not what our government
said, or anybody involved in this until now
it was uncomfortable.
But you have to understand that the charge
the charge of trafficking
is look. Epstein
was involved with this. Not that Maxwell was
bringing people to him and that's all it
was. You can quite literally prove with with
well beyond this this dump of emails that
Epstein was involved with intelligence networks,
involved with much higher level activity.
You can also prove that they were involved
with actual trafficking
and manipulation of children. The argument he's trying
to make is that Maxwell was basically bringing
him children or bringing him young girls because
he was a creep, and that's it.
But why would that then be trafficking? Are
you now saying that she went
out of country and out of the to
bring people to him? I mean, you could
argue that a guess would make sense. You
have to understand the evidence challenges that. So
you have he is either
lying or doesn't even understand what he's talking
about.
There is no evidence, he writes, of an
international pedophile ring. I mean, come on, guys.
Like, this is the stupidest part of this.
You could argue that Epstein's a lie. You
could argue that every part of this is
a deception that our government but to argue
that that statement is true is to be
completely ignorant of the world reality.
I mean, like, a documented
international
what's the name of the group? There are
international
entities
that document
child trafficking, that document child abuse, and they
will tell war zones,
just normal action. Our our our child protective
services in The United States has been called
out for this, not because they're doing it.
I do believe there's an overlap, but because
what they do and the way that they
conduct themselves creates an opening for that to
happen. But all I'm saying is that that's
provable reality. This has been covered by documentaries
about it, and he has the nerve to
come in and say there is no such
thing. So, let me let me get this
straight. We can acknowledge that there are pedophiles,
right, Art Mandalay? Yes. Okay. We can we
can agree that there are higher level people
that manipulate through governments and intelligence for any
number of purposes, right? Yes. We can acknowledge
that there are sex
trafficking discussions across the world. Right? We're not
denying sex trafficking. Right? We're all okay. Okay.
So all those pieces are independent.
They all exist separately around the world, but
we're gonna try to pretend that there's nobody
out there trying to work with somebody else.
No one's trying to say, I don't know,
move them somewhere else for other purposes. You
realize how stupid that is? Like, this is
my point. I I find this to be
intentionally deceptive,
which in effect is covering up the very
thing he thinks he's claiming isn't real.
Think about how dark that is.
Not just this Epstein case, but trafficking in
general. Pedophile rings in general. Doesn't that remind
you of what the government now telling you
this is
what they were saying for the last ten
years? You brought up child trafficking. People were
calling it a conspiracy theory.
No cabal of elites abusing women.
I mean, what a so there's not a
group of elitist people who are abusing women
anywhere in the world? You have to realize
this is this is a desperate effort, in
my opinion.
He goes, let's be real. The release of
the Epstein files has been an unmitigated disaster.
Well, that's true. Victims have had their names
and, yes, that's because they they're either incompetent
or they did that to muddy the waters.
Innocent people have had their names dragged through
the mud. Yeah. Well, too bad, man. You
realize you realize the reason this is happening
is because of the way they've covered this
up? And now look, I understand that there
are people that might
I'll I'll put it this way.
If there are names that came out with
these files that are ultimately a people who
have nothing to do with it,
then people who are making allegations that are
unsubstantiated should be called out for that.
I mean, look. You've realized people yell out
negative things about me or other people in
this field all the time. It doesn't make
it okay, but you just have to understand
that the the idea is that what we
shouldn't go through this process to find the
truth because somebody else might get
yelled the wrong thing at, and realize that
people like you and people, I shouldn't say
that, people in independent media, mainstream and alternative,
will make those allegations on purpose to muddy
the waters.
End this madness. Okay. So end it meaning
move on. We don't care anymore. We're not
gonna deal with this. So here's Harrison Smith.
Here's the weird thing about this. Trump is
not in the Epstein files like they are
insinuating.
Well, let's listen to what they had to
say.
So why,
are Republicans so interested
in Bill Hillary Clinton? It's because they're trying
to distract
from the fact that Donald Trump is in
the Epstein files thousands and thousands of times.
In those files, there's highly disturbing allegations
of Donald Trump raping children,
of Donald Trump threatening to kill children.
So I encourage your press to go look
at these allegations,
and I'm highly disturbed that deputy attorney general
Todd Blanch just got the law wrong.
Yesterday, he said,
essentially, that it is not a crime to
party with Jeffrey Epstein.
Well, that's actually not correct.
If Jeffrey Epstein
was
human trafficking
minors for these sex parties
and you show up and patronize
the establishment
at that party,
yes. You're guilty because Isn't it interesting?
And this is just a good a good
insight to the to the window of the
partisanship.
Could you imagine him saying this when they
were the ones in power?
Just just casually discussing sending children to sex
parties? No. They would have looked at you
like you're crazy conspiracy theorist, while the Republicans
at the time were going, oh, the pedophile
is coming down. Right? Now it's flipped around.
Now you've got the Republicans over there clutching
their pearls going, how dare you? That's that's
not real. And now you've got the Democrats
going, children's sex parties. I mean, it just
got it has to shock us free. This
is so, like, bombastic right now. It shows
you how clearly they play these character roles.
Now it doesn't mean he he very well
may mean this right now because it is
in fact the reality. He said allegations.
He didn't imply that it was real. He
said allegations.
But my point would be that even if
he means this right now, he very well
may pull that punch when it's his time
to be empowered. We know this, guys, because
they're probably in some way implicated.
That's a good guess right now, to be
honest. Patronizing is part of the law, the
federal sex trafficking law. So deputy general Taubland
just got that wrong, which maybe explains why
they aren't investigating
all these folks, including Donald Trump. He needs
to read the law and investigate these people.
He also needs to resign,
not only for not knowing the law, but
a massive,
not only
screw up, but the biggest privacy violation in
history.
They release
Mhmm. A lot of pictures
of minors. I can't believe that's not a
bigger story right now. Why I mean, that
should be like, there should be institutions, the
FBI. I mean, what's going on? They quite
literally put out child pornography.
They put out innocent picture pictures of innocent
children
naked. They put out names of of of
the very victims they claimed they were trying
to help, addresses. I mean, come on.
There's only one way two way it's either
an accident
or they did it to to, I guess,
to just throw a a stick into the
spokes. Either way, that's insane. And if and
just we just move on.
Where where's all I mean, yes. It was
covered by the corporate media, but are you
telling me the media that is hell bent
on destroying Trump, no matter what, wouldn't be
fixated on that forever?
It's just so damn obvious, man. Unredacted.
Just violated
the privacy of these girls.
It is
uncalled for what they did. The one thing
that they could not do
under this law was to invade the privacy,
of these women
now who were girls at the time, who
were,
And realize that that gave them the opening
to basically redact everything. They could just been
like, it's all under that law. It's all
which I mean, that clearly, there's people that
are trying to show. They probably would've got
caught because they're bad at what they do,
but they could've.
Instead, they just clumsily let out the pictures
of people. Again, it very well may have
been on by design, but somebody should be
accountable for that. Somebody. That but guess what?
We don't have their intercommunications
even though it's required by law, and now
we don't know who did what. They probably
never tell you. Victims of
sex trafficking.
Also, he met with Ghislaine Maswell. Maxwell
moved her to the minimum security prison and
then got a puppy for her. So Right.
I mean, let's think about this, guys. Let's
not forget that point. Right? Maxwell, before all
this happened, got a proper agreement that gave
them direction. They moved her in her cushy
prison despite her being charged and found guilty
of human trafficking.
And that's no big deal, though. Add to
the list of things that are
by themselves should be, like, earth shattering that
just end up being ignored
because no big deal.
Well, here's what he says.
Trump is not this is Harrison Smith again.
Trump is not in the obscene files like
they're insinuating.
Well, no, bud. They literally are exactly in
those files, exactly the way they said.
As he writes, they there are a bunch
of ridiculous disproved allegations, but nothing of subs.
Okay. Well, if you you wanna play it
again, he didn't go, this means everything. He
simply said, there's a lot of allegations about
Trump in there. This should be investigated. You
know what I mean? Look. I can point
to other clips of Harrison, well, who make
objective points about exactly this kind of stuff.
But weirdly, when it comes to Donald Trump,
he acts like that's not true, what he
just said, then repeats what he just said.
That's the come on.
There's something pulling this punch. I'm pretty sure
we can guess where that's coming from. However,
people close to Trump like Howard Letnick are
implicated. Well, but Lutnick is just the same
way Trump is in many provable ways. Maybe
you don't know that because you're buying the
narrative swinging around mainstream alternative media. There are
actionable information is actionable information.
There are actionable points within these files. Two
that I just pointed to
that we can show they never investigated, but
there's plenty more than that.
But to claim it's just nothing but allegation,
well, let's put it this way on top
of all that. Let's just say they are
just nothing substa well, we would demand that,
wouldn't we? You wanna tell me, Harrison, how
you know for a fact that every one
of those things were investigated because Cash told
you?
Genuine question. How would you I mean, what
kind of a journalist is gonna say that's
the fact because the guys lying about them
files told me? Unless you somehow have insight
into the fact that everyone was investigated, followed
up, and proven to be false. I'd love
to see that. I would credit you for
that, but I doubt that's the reality.
So if the Dems were at all sincere
about getting to the bottom of this, they
would pressure Trump through his associates, but not
lying about Trump himself. Okay. Again,
you wanna point out anything he said and
there's a lie, I'll give you a $100.
It is a lie because you don't want
to believe what you think the insinuation is,
but guess what? We're not talking about insinuations.
He said there's allegations about Trump raping children.
There are allegations about Trump raping children.
Period.
So why are you lying about that, Harrison?
It's a good question.
Or maybe you just don't see it. I
don't know.
Now here is another example of this. Mike
Davis. What accountability for lawfare against Trump and
his allies or want that? Then stop demanding
every good person at justice department sift through
documents of the absolute files.
That's quite a hard turn.
Nobody more than the Republican Party
is calling this out.
Or excuse me, no nobody nobody but the
Republican Party was calling for this. And here
we are with the Republican Party now turning
around and going,
no. It's not there. Nothing there. Nothing burger.
I mean, think about that. Clay Morrison says
this is actually real. I had to read
it twice. So you're saying Massey calling for
the files is preventing the DOJ from going
after criminals?
Meaning there's no criminals in the Epstein files,
murderers, cannibals, sex traffickers. Now to be clear
again, a lot of the things he's referencing
are subjective,
like reports from the FBI. Doesn't mean false,
though. Far as I can tell, most of
them haven't been investigated, but we don't know
the full picture.
So when he pointed those things, the point
is we wanna investigate it, not that we
can prove that is somebody should be arrested.
But it's still a valid point. The DOJ
is so busy putting PDFs online to focus
on anything else. Gotcha.
Think about that, guys. You now have Turning
Point USA, Mike Davis,
and Mike Davis telling you that we should
stop calling for this information
even though these people were telling you that
you should be doing that before and when
Democrats were in power.
That's pretty sad.
So Todd Blanch, 2025.
I worked closely with Cash Patel and Bongino
on the joint FBI DOJ memo regarding the
Epstein files.
All of us signed off on the contents
of the memo and the conclusion stated in
the memo. The suggestion by anybody that there
was any daylight between the FBI and DOJ
is false.
2025.
And do you remember what happened?
They said, there's nothing more.
They said, that's it. We put out the
first part, there's nothing more. We did what
we could. And and then what we found
out later was there was more because we
got more, and that's what we're pointing to
right now. So Jeff says, remember when the
DOJ and FBI tried to convince us there
was no client list, No persons of interest?
Told us Epstein killed himself and tried to
pronounce the entire Epstein case closed? None of
these people and institutions are worthy of our
trust. I mean, you this is my point
about Trump as the same thing. You can't
keep watching them lie to you and say,
That's it.
And then we go, No, it's not. There's
more. And they go, No, that's it. It's
all porn. And they go, Well, we want
And then eventually they, you know, Oh, that's
a truck on my desk. Girl, nope, now
there's more. And it goes back and forth
and back and forth. But remember, they said,
That's it.
And now we're sifting through things that are
bombshells.
So if you can't stand back and go,
then why they clearly lied to you right
there. They didn't just accidentally fall back into
all of these things that were actually important.
They tried they were hoping desperately that you
stopped.
Like that Truman Show point. Right? The most
transparent administration in history, DC Drago, and they're
holding up all those files that were redacted
that gave us nothing. They were hoping that
was enough.
It's very simple.
Crystal Ball highlights what Reuters had to say.
So, again, they're they're telling you that's it.
Because that's what's happening. Trump is now saying
that's it. No more files coming.
Reuters writes, millions of files related to Jeffrey
Epstein suggest the existence of a global criminal
enterprise
that carried out acts meeting the legal threshold
of crimes against humanity. A panel of independent
experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council
says
that that doesn't mean you could that don't
take question everything. Right? As always. But I'm
simply this is just this is from the
seventeenth
telling you that UN experts are now going
through the information and saying,
yeah. That's a big deal.
They could be wrong. They could be lying.
But realize how crazy it is that this
is where we are. Well, everyone seems to
be acknowledging the importance of this except for
the people who gave it to you. Crystal
Ball says, and we were told there was
nothing to see here. No crimes to prosecute.
No further investigation required. Just imagine what's in
the files they're still hiding.
I thought this was funny.
For the podcast, it's a meme. A guy
on the right, you've seen this classic setup
with mister Bean, but it says conspiracy theorist
ten years ago he's studying, and then it
shows mister Bean to the news, the news,
2026, trying to copy off the conspiracy theories
from ten years ago.
You remember how often they told us this
stuff was nonsense, you know, or whatever else?
Anything we're talking about from from geoengineering
to, you know they used to tell you
black helicopters were were a conspiracy theory. It's
really?
It's just it it's a provable reality, like
any number of these things. You can look
it up right now. It's it's still
humorous and alarming.
So Brian Allen reports that they're telling you.
They're done. No more.
No more's coming out. Remember, that's like the
second time we've heard that. So probably gonna
see some more after this, but probably, you
know, who knows what they'll actually do. At
the end of the day, we should demand
everything because we have a right to know
what's going on. They're doing nothing. Growing backlash
and political backlash by the Republican political backlash
against what one lawmaker is now labeling the
Epstein administration
after attorney general Pam Bondi said the DOJ
is done releasing the Epstein files even though
roughly half of the 6,000,000 documents they have
are still under wraps. Even Republicans are incensed,
including senator John Kennedy who said this weekend,
the justice department needs to, quote, release everything.
South Carolina congresswoman Nancy Mace tweeted, quote, the
days of cover up are over. A sentiment
echoed
No more. That's it.
But we'll see. I I doubt that's when
ultimately gonna end this. There's no way I
get away from this, but here's Trump yet
again.
And Bong saying he's really gonna die on
this hill. This is gonna be his legacy.
A lot of Republicans are saying that right
now. Here's Trump. And, no, he made a
statement about me and Jeffrey Epstein's. I have
nothing to do with that. I have nothing
to do with Jeffrey Epstein. And in fact,
if you look at the DOJ, they announced,
you know, they released 3,000,000
pages. It's like this is all they're supposed
to be doing.
And, frankly, the DOJ, I think, should just
say,
we have other things to do because that
whole thing is turned out. I mean, other
than Bill Clinton and, you know, Bill Gates
and lots of people that have
there are a lot of questions about it,
but nothing on me. But it was even
sort of better than that because they found
that Jeffrey Epstein and his sleazebank writer named
Michael Wolf were conspiring
against Donald Trump to lose the election.
So Epstein
was conspiring
with a writer
for me to lose the election.
So right there, you know, that I had
nothing to do with this guy. But,
yeah, it's a terrible thing. The the amount
of time that's being wasted. You know, when
Epstein was alive,
like, ten years ago, nobody cared about it.
But they're only doing it. But now it's
it's really hitting back on them because Bill
Clinton is such a big part of it.
The demo So we didn't we didn't care
so much that we were all aggressively covering
the story. Right? It's it's just these are
it's just lies. He stands up there and
goes, I'm exonerated. No. It's not true. No
one believes that.
Crats are pushing it.
And the problem is that it's turning out
to be the Democrats that were with and
conspired with. It's just such a lazy lie.
Yes. I agree. But that's not what it's
turning out to show. In fact, it's quite
the opposite. I think the Democrats have been
more implicated over the years.
You know my opinion. I think it's all
of them. But what's happening right now is
the opposite while he tries to kind of
flounder the other direction. It's very hard to
watch, guys, because you know he doesn't think
that. It's pretty clear he sees what's going
on. That's just pretty sad.
Epstein. So I think you're probably gonna see
a little pullback from them. But but think
of it.
They were working together to try and
help me lose the election,
but
this is the Oval Office, so I guess
that didn't work out too well. Right. Okay.
One more He's the small one fighting the
power
as he's the power.
Just love to frame themselves as still kind
of like the underling fighting. You know? They're
they're the David fighting clients. It's just not
the reality.
Now here is Ducey telling you that they're
planning for how they're gonna frame
the mid, you know, the midterms and and
our our all of our accomplishments,
which I agree with Murray. He says no
amount of propaganda will save the Republicans in
the midterms. Now, you know, whatever happens next
in the midterms, I don't think really you
know my opinion about the way the voting
works in this country.
I don't believe that where it's even fully
I don't believe it translates to the outcome
to make it as clear as possible. Who
knows with influence? But I think I mean,
look. I think there's,
like, foundationally clear of evidence that on all
sides, our government's been manipulating this as far
as back as I've been doing this. You
and we can all seem to see it
on the other side, but just recognize that.
Now only saying that is that we should
question it regardless. But here,
what we have,
where was I on the the,
with the deucey point about the propaganda, is
that ultimately,
him coming out and claiming we're gonna be
talking about all the good things for our
accomplishments, but I think it's about them game
planning, how in the world they're gonna get
Republicans to stop talking about this. I don't
think they're going to. I I I honestly
think it's near impossible for that to happen
right now. But the point about his midterms,
you know, or the point about the midterms,
I mean, who knows what's gonna happen to
voting process?
But if there is some kind of a
translate you know, if it does translate at
all, I would argue they're probably gonna lose
a lot.
But then because I think that's the way
it's kinda supposed to go, but who knows
whether that's organic or not. But here's what
Deucey had to say.
Yes. I just got a text from a
senior White House official who is confirming a
story that just crossed in Axios.
Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff,
James Blair, one of her top lieutenants, and
a bunch of chiefs of staff, as well
as some cabinet level secretaries
are meeting right now on Capitol Hill in
private or I should say,
near Capitol Hill in private to try to
figure out president Trump's messaging strategy, how to
sell
his, accomplishments, and what he plans to do
to help their chances in the midterms. Of
course, next week, the State of the Union
will be the chance to do that in
prime time. Brett. You'll see it right here.
Peter Ducey live in the North Lawn. Peter,
thanks.
Alright. So we're game planning on how we
can, you know, demonstrate all of our accomplishments.
You know, I just think that's a it's
it's just like before. I I think they're
in, like, a a serious moment right now
where they're going, how in the world are
we going to get past this? But just
they're trying to, you know, project something different.
I don't think it's gonna work.
Ian Carroll says, in regard to Nancy Mace's
post, we're calling on the CIA to allow
us to view all records.
Okay. It feels weird about this to me,
especially since what I said before, I believe.
I don't think that she's I think that
she's playing a counterbalance from within the partisanship
to make you think somebody within it cares
about you. I could definitely be wrong. Congress
needs to know what, if any, relationship the
CIA had with Epstein.
I mean, first of all, I mean, you're
talking about the CIA. Okay? I mean, what
do you think they're gonna do? You I
mean, this is
I feel like this is a very dangerous
thing to argue to call for.
Classified or not, we wanna see it. Now
realize, she's not calling about it for you.
She's saying we Nancy Mace wants to see
it. So it's just one more layer of
of we don't get to see what she
sees, and why would we trust what she
has to tell us? At the end of
the day, I don't trust the CIA in
any possible way. Classified or not, we wanna
see it. The American people deserve answers. Yes.
We do. Not Mace telling us those answers.
Ian says, Yes. This is a 100% the
next step and it's non negotiable. Well,
I think there's a lot of other directions
we could go other than, Hey, CIA. Come
drip feed us what you want us to
see about something you were clearly involved in.
Really?
Now he says, time for the CIA under
Gabbard to step up to the plate. Now
look, maybe he means this as, like, you
know, let's call them out. I hope so.
But the do what what Nancy Mace is
saying, we're calling on the CIA
to help us. That's what she's calling for.
And he says, yes. That's nonnegotiable. I just
think that's a very weird response to the
CIA who is completely implicated in this entire
conversation.
On top of that,
I just thought it was important to include
this. And I'm responding to old post from
Alex Jones saying, they're connected to the CIA.
And that's when I said, oh, you mean
the CIA that Trump is down here saying,
we need to get them involved now.
Yes. The same CIA that Trump said, We
need involved. The same CIA that said our
R. F. K. Jr. Said killed his uncle.
Yes. Sure seems weird, doesn't it? Except when
you realize that it's all a bunch of
narrative control and manipulation. But the truth
here's the actual post itself, the CIA must
get involved, is that this
is an interwoven
intelligence problem that goes well beyond one country
as Whitney has covered more than once.
So I'm very concerned with people saying, let's
get the CIA involved with this conversation.
That seems like the wrong step to me,
quite frankly.
Worth considering. Now Chris Martinson also adds in
a very relevant point to the timeline of
all this. He goes, it's just a complete
coincidence that DOJ has completely withheld
all of the Epstein documents immediately before, during,
and after
09:11.
Come on, guys.
For the podcast, it's a very it's a
good graphic because it really makes a point.
So they're playing this game. Woah. That's it.
It's all redacted or it's all the bad
stuff even though they've already tried to play
that game and released more.
And I don't even believe the number we're
getting given, so it's probably more than half.
So we're told we have half. Okay.
Just so happens that in that half is
all of the time frame right in that
most important inflection point for this country that
they were clearly involved with. If you understand
the Israel connection through Epstein through what happened
in this country, that's my opinion. I I
just don't think it's my opinion. I think
it's a fact, but you can decide. But
think about that. That they have chosen to
withhold a very specific time frame. You know
what that means, guys. I mean, I shouldn't
say it like that. I think it's pretty
clear. But, you know what it suggests. Right?
That the because of the involvement of what
happened to nine eleven, which goes well beyond
a bunch of Saudi Arabian people playing,
even but, of course, even from that, you
could clearly draw connections through Saudi Arabia to
all the things we know it connects to,
but that's not even the real story.
I'll recommend again James Corbett's work.
This is our watch along. Easy one to
pop up.
False false flags. A secret history of Al
Qaeda watch along. It goes all the way
through 09:11. James Corbett's always doing great work,
and they're keeping that from your view.
That very well may be the entire reason
why this is happening the way that it
is. In regard to the half not being
seen, the way that they, oopsie, we released
all these bad things, or oopsie, you guys
can't deal with nice things because you're jumping
at shadows of subjective points that we put
out on purpose, so we have to pull
back.
Either way,
I think it's pretty obvious what's going on
right now. And this understand that nine eleven
or any kind of war conversation or Israel,
it's a all of our government problem, guys.
Lastly on this, on Zora Ranch.
Shadow of Ezra points out the new owner
of Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch who we just
talked about, Don Huffins
or Ruffins,
announces that the property is already, quote, under
construction.
If you just watched our show, that you
should laugh out loud right now And it's
being transformed into a Christian retreat. Of course
it is. He says he knew it was
a dark place and wanted to turn into
a place of light. Guys, he just literally
said the opposite in the interview. Not both,
in fact, about construction and about what he
feels about the location. He says, the plan
is all along to make this property a
Christian retreat. Come on. Okay. This guy, my
gut, there's something very wrong right here. The
way that he's now responding because of the
attention, let's I just covered this in two
previous shows, guys.
The the the representative from New Mexico is
calling this out. She called for the investigation
based on the,
you know what? I might even have that
very quickly. I'll play that real quick because
I wanna I want you to see the
email beneath it.
Oh, maybe not. Actually, I think it's gone
from yesterday.
The point was that video for the of
the person speaking about it. So we've shown
actually, I'll I'll bring this up so you
have something to go on. I don't have
the show in front of me that I
I think it's the last the one before
last, one before that. But
this old this I'll just bring this up
as the article. Allegations of bodies buried in
Epstein's New Mexico ranch prompt investigation calls. Now
the point here is that
Garcia Richard
sent the letter.
I forget what her position was. Right? Oh,
it's right here. New Mexico's public lands commissioner
Stephanie Garcia Richard.
She called this out, I believe, in 2019
based on an email that quite literally showed
files of child sex manipulation
and and said that this is the evidence
and the whole thing. We've never got to
see that, and I don't think everybody should
want to see it, but it's given to
the FBI.
She called it out and said, this is
this is crazy. Someone needs to investigate. Somebody
who worked at Zora Ranch sent this to,
I believe, what was his name? Edward, who
was a commentator in in a conservative
radio movement, a radio field.
And so, ultimately, she called it out. Nothing
happened.
That's proven.
Now this comes back around, and she's coming
out in 2026,
seven years later. Alright. No. It's in '20
what is it? '20
oh, the 2019?
I can't remember if that was the date
or not. But okay. Somewhere around there. The
point was that she comes out now and
says, I can't believe this isn't being investigated.
I called it out then. Nobody cared. Here
I am again with the same call, which
needs to show you that they never investigated
this. So that's one point out of all
of these that that alone should stop them
from pretending nothing's there's nothing there.
It's powerful, guys. Now, like, coming to this,
he himself was saying before that it was
some random auction. They weren't even aware. You
know, whatever he was saying, sort of, like,
benign dismissal and saying clearly that
what was it? The fam the family was
all involved and was trying to rehash it
all in my mind.
That there is really nothing to go on.
Right? That there is nothing problematic.
Now because of all this coverage, he's now
saying it's already under construction. Don't you think
that if that had come up, if it
was actually under construction, that that would have
been stated in that last discussion that was,
like, days ago?
Now maybe you just forgot to say it.
I'm not gonna pretend we know for sure.
But the allegation is there are bodies buried
on this ranch, more than just the two
they're referencing in that email.
There's allegations of sex trafficking from people in
these files, a native American woman on this
ranch,
and it's never been investigated.
And now suddenly, when it gets attention, well,
guess what? It's all being it's already we've
dug everything up. It's already being constructed.
That think about that, guys. They're digging things
up right now in a location that very
well maybe is a crime scene. Now you
have plans to,
take something evil and bring it into goodness,
bring it into
light and positivity. Tell us about that plan.
The new mainstream alternative media, guys,
half a step removed from congress,
bringing you the truth
slanted in interest of the government.
Well, of course, that is the main reason
I bought the property.
This was obviously a dark place, and we
wanted to put light in a dark place.
It I'm pretty sure his statement before was
that they didn't even know it was they
they bought it off auction. It wasn't but
now he's suggesting he bought it because he
knew what was going on there.
I don't know how you don't see this
as being weird. It always shines the brightest
when you do that.
My faith is is so strong in Jesus,
and it really is. And I'm It sounds
like Elon Musk today going, I believe in
Jesus. They all seem like they're strict reaching
for some gonna make this the plan all
along is to make this property into a
Christian
retreat. A matter of fact, it's under construction
today. And That's that's our goal. That's why
we named it San Rafael.
We named Saint Saint Raphael as you probably
know, you know,
an archangel and his in his,
what he does and and helps people with
is, healing and and being the healer and
also blessing those that are traveling. And I
think that's really I know for sure that
this guy is is you know, maybe he
has no idea, but I just get a
weird sense from it. And I just don't
like the over the top kind of,
you know, I tend you know, I've dealt
with a lot of charlatans in my life
and especially with the from from a religious
perspective. And there's just something about it when
people are just kind of, like, doth protest
too much. Like, you know, it's not necessary
to just it's like so like I always
say about people in in you know, who
I'm so strong. I'm the strongest person around.
That usually indicates
weakness. Maybe not even necessarily physical weakness, but
weakness. I think that's worth thinking about. In
a sense, like, just felt very over the
top to me. But you guys can decide
for yourself. My point is about the timing,
the construction of a place that's not right
now currently being called for investigation, who's been
call who has been, has been called to
be investigated by people in the government
going back 2019.
And now he's digging up the ground.
I'll include this for you. Oops. That's the
wrong
one. Move that down. There we go. So
let next, let's get into a couple more
points before we get into the bill itself
about Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and some of
the people within this team. Kash Patel and
Dan Bongino in their joint interview.
Avoid the Jeffrey Epstein topic altogether. What a
surprise.
And instead, tell the audience that the decisions
they made while working together were just too
difficult.
They admit that most of the time, the
decisions they made were required permission from the
top.
I can't even believe that they said what
they did here because you realize
the FBI director is not supposed to be
beholden to the president.
Like, you realize if the president commits a
crime, they're they could be investigated by the
FBI. But no. Nope. Cash Patel is going,
what do I do, mister president? That's been
our point the whole time. They do what
they're told.
That's not how it's supposed to work. Bondi,
same thing. She's not a secretary as that
person who absolutely made that point in the
congress. She is supposed to be independent. They're
clearly not. This is just hard to watch,
guys.
Breathing's a level 10 decision,
Cash.
A level 10 meaning there's a a pardon
the language, but a shitty decision and a
shittier one. Because if it was an if
there was a good decision to be made,
someone else made it. And then when when
those decisions that's every day. I know you
know this because I would knock on your
door, and you'd be like, what now? And
I'd be like, here we go again. Like,
something else will come up. But I just
wanna put into perspective for folks out there.
When when that decision can't even be made
by
by by by me, it goes to you.
When it doesn't go to you,
it it goes, like, to the president's desk.
He's dealing with, like, level 11 decisions, and
that's the thing in DC. That's why the
batting average isn't always gonna be a thousand.
There are there's no good call to be
made or someone else would have made it.
There's just really tough decisions. What does that
even mean?
There's no good call or somebody else would
have made it? That's gotta be the stupidest
argument I've ever heard.
That that's like saying, well, if there was
something to be done, it would have already
been done. That's the same point. That's not
true. That's a that's a it a, like,
a lazy, lazy sidestep
because I don't know, you know, at the
top of my head,
arrest people for crimes.
That's a possible action. Right? I mean, they're
only two or as if there's only good
or bad or good or a little bit
worse. Is it false binary, left or right?
They just know this is how people get
manipulated.
And we have to be clear about this,
guys. They were just like with the Trump
administration or what they're all doing. We're out
there going, absolute, everywhere, bring it down, Epstein
files, everybody, all the Democrats. And then the
moment they stepped into power, they're like, Epstein?
I don't know. We have to look into
it. Like, it's just lazy. Now at the
very least, you could have been like, well,
I was wrong.
That would have been a way to go.
I said a lot of stuff on the
podcast, but when I got here, it's a
different picture.
They kinda did that, but they did it
in a cheap, you know, weak way. They
didn't take the ownership of that mistake. They
just said, well, it was more difficult like
they're doing now.
So they lied to you, guys. They lied
to you because they kept carrying that forward.
Bongino ran away
and now acts like it's some I mean,
that's just sad to me. And now you're
back here acting like it's just so difficult.
There was really no other choices but to
cover up what we're watching right now. I
mean, you realize Cash has been caught lying,
like, three or four times in this.
So you can't argue it was just a
couple of bad choices. You guys are lying
to people. And I'm pretty sure most of
the Republican party knows that. Even people that
still support Trump seem to call these guys
out.
Where, you know, there's a shit call and
a shittier call. And listen, that's what we
signed up for. That Oh, by the way,
they're gonna repeat that again, like, six times.
Like, that's the point that just keep repeating
because they're really trying to stress to you.
Don't be don't blame me. It just was
a tough thing. It was tough. It was
hard. Very difficult. That's how it rolls. Look.
Yeah. These are difficult decisions, Dan. That's why
you volunteered to jump back in. It wasn't
just gonna be, hey. We're gonna do this
job. It's gonna be super easy. We're not
gonna have to make any hard decisions. Yeah.
You you following so far, guys? It was
hard.
And we're not gonna have to combat a
press corps that has largely been biased and
full of,
inaccurate reporting. Yeah. You mean, like, literally all
the time forever under every administration forever.
So you got the same circumstances.
But we made those decisions collectively
in the best interest of the nation.
And if we hadn't, then none of this
would be true. None of this Oh, his
little talking points he brought to make sure
he gave you all the good things we've
done. Oh, what is that? Like a like,
six, seven things? You're knocking out of the
park, bud. Would be possible. If president Trump
had made the hard decisions
to,
to allow us and give us the resources
that we need If he had to make
the hard decisions to allow us, I don't
know what I'm gonna say, and give us
the things we need,
what's hard about that?
They just he it's just it's a formula
or formula it's formulaic.
You know, you're supposed to go, Trump, it's
all responsible because Trump did the things that
let us know blah blah. Trump's the greatest,
and that's what they're doing. That's that's an
employee, guys.
And to back the blue in law enforcement
and just to prioritize working with state and
local authorities,
then we wouldn't be able to do what
we did. But you're right. We had a
lot of hard decisions.
That's comes with the territory of the job.
What you did? I mean, is it over?
You're in the middle of administration. What did
you do? You can't, I mean, you can't
you can't point oh, I arrested some people
over here. Like, if you go back and
compare
to pre I mean, I it it's worth
looking at what people have done in previous
administrations. I think they're all corrupt, but it's
actually pretty insulting for him to act like
or Trump to act like they've changed the
world when all they've done is actually less
than what you'd expect. And far more of
all the worst things they said they weren't
gonna do, like Trump and spending more or
no war or whatever else. It's the same
conversation. Now I don't know what this doesn't
probably mean anything. I found this the way
he reacts here, this facial thing, I found
it maybe telling. Maybe if you read anything
in it. Who backs the blue in law
enforcement just to prioritize working with state and
local authorities,
then we wouldn't be able to do what
we did. But you're right. We had a
lot of hard decisions,
and that's comes with the territory of the
job.
But once you look outside of the cauldron
Some it's like I I get the sense
that, like, somebody was talking his ear right
there.
I that's what I think. This is my
opinion. Watch again. I won't let it play.
Blue in law enforcement is a
Oh. It's just a Damn it. Sorry. I
hit that button on accident. Back to this
one. State and give us the resources that
we need and to back the blue in
law enforcement just to prioritize working with state
and local authorities,
then we wouldn't be able to do what
we did. But you're right. We had a
lot of hard decisions, and that's comes with
the territory of the job.
But once you look outside of the cauldron
of Washington DC, and this is one of
the things that, you know, I'm trying to
remind myself of every day. Outside of here,
there is a different America than the one
that lives in the National Capital Region. And
I try to remind myself every day when
making those difficult decisions that you talked about
that we make on It's like the forty
fifth time they've made that point. Daily basis
that we are making a decision collectively for
the rest of America, not just for the
minority of people that are living part time
in Washington, DC,
pulling the levers on Capitol Hill and so.
Yeah. Except that's not true at all, though.
Now it's fun to say those things out
loud, you know, like LARPing. That's what they
know how to do. Not true, though. It's
just not. What they're doing in every possible
way is in the interest of the power
structure.
You think anything they've done is in the
interest of the people of this country? I
mean, you could argue about arresting people. What
the point is about the lard the the
the I mean, even that, to be honest,
if you wanna dig into what they're really
doing, at the time, I think, like, the
reactionary doing things to make you think something's
changing. But, yes, yes, I'm JV when it
comes to government. I just don't think that's
the reality at all,
especially when it comes to Epstein, which is
the point that most people are caring about
right now. Now, here is another post
where they talk about,
you know, I'm really, you know, so I'm
just I'm tired of these guys. To be
honest, the point is they say, What happened
when we went across towns in America? You
know what happened. People came up and said,
Oh, my God. You're so great. Oh, you
did everything and, you know, you were so
much safer because of you.
I mean, how could you even, like, quantify
that and, like, measure How would you know
that those actions are what caused you? It's
just it's just sad. Even if it didn't
happen, those are people that are like, Oh,
my God. You're Elvis because you're Trump's administration.
The reality is I don't think that's even
true.
But, again, that's my opinion. But this is
what they do. Trump comes and goes, before
when I was gonna be about to be
in the presidency, people came to me and
said, please, Trump, make a deal with me.
Again, you could literally prove that didn't happen.
He made that case. They all they all
reached out to me. No. They did not.
That's what they do. Left, right, government. And
there are some of them like these people
are just really bad at it, and it's
easy to see.
So here's another clip about Antifa just to
make this case about the lies they were
continually putting out there. Of course, this guy
says, Kash Patel with, you know, rude
I'm sorry. It's just so funny to me.
No. Except it's been posted 17 times. Red
flashy light because that's the way you're supposed
to do it. FBI director Kash Patel drops
major intel on Antifa Funding Network on Bungie.
No. He didn't. He literally goes, we have
information. It's coming out. That's the major bombshell.
And guess what, guys? He said that three
months
ago on a show, and it didn't happen.
As I told you it would not, mark
my words again, we'll go for another three
months. And when we don't get anything, you'll
find that. But, see, this is the problem,
is people like this Jay guy, I'm just
assuming because he's postposed, are just like, Yay,
the thing. They're the best no matter what
because that's my team. I actually don't know
this person, but I just it's this is
what we keep seeing. Look at the days
of Antifa are coming to an end.
Okay.
Now, here, let's actually watch the clip, and
then we'll come back to this. Oh, wait.
Did I
maybe I didn't grab it.
No. I did. Hold on. Where was that
one?
It's just a willingness that you and I
and this building's new leadership took to say,
we're gonna look at the facts that exist.
We're not gonna try to make up facts
that don't so we can serve a political
narrative. And wait till you and I know
you know this, but wait till you see
what's coming,
in the next month or two on the
funding streams related to this. You and I
had launched a serious investigation.
We had said these organizations
don't operate
alone, don't operate in silence.
They operate with a heavy, heavy stream of
funding.
So too does literally every operation,
both those that are intelligent or illegitimate or
corrupt and just corporations that operate on funding.
Funny how that works, right? Funding makes things
operate. But, you know, you could make that
into be the funding.
And it could very well mean that there's
something going on there. But see, they have
turned into, you know, you filming me is
a crime. You yelling words at my face
is violence, just like the left was saying
before. Funny how that works. And now, literally,
this same point.
That they're can't you tell the protests are
funded? They're all effing funded. What are you
talking about? Now I'm not saying we shouldn't
be critical. And I'm not saying we can't
prove that there's government or Soros or Musk
type things that are influencing these things. What
I'm saying is, where's the crime?
Show it to me. I'll call it out.
Show me how the I I know that
they are in there. The crime is not
money being given to people who are protesting.
That's how they then illegalize or use that
to shut down any protest. Funny how easy
that is to break down.
But let's be real, guys. There's funding like
that on left and right. It's very easy
to prove. Both sides wanna make the other
one out to be somehow gas or gaslighting.
Part of them probably are.
But when you find the crime in there,
when people are doing something that's more than
that, then that's the only thing we can
act on. Not because I don't want to
do more because when I can I think
I can see people manipulating others, but because
when you open that door, which is what
the government's doing it all for, you give
them that and then they can go further?
And they're doing it right now. They're shutting
down people protesting legally in this country because
of the narratives they've set up by morons
like this.
So the point here
Serious investigation.
Antifa cell members indicted in Pergamon shooting. Oh,
by the way, that's from 11/14/2025.
Yes, guys. That's the same thing they said
when that first happened. Now, again,
like I say every time, because I'm objective,
maybe a month from now, they'll break this
all out, and I'll it'll be like, oh
my god. Look at all the maybe it
breaks open the whole Antifa thing, and they
all go to jail. And I'll be like,
yes. I was incorrect.
Cause I was if if that's what happens,
I would be. But again, I'm saying it's
my opinion anyway. But I would come out
and say, Turns out I was wrong about
that. Funny how that doesn't happen that often.
Point that out. Demonstrating our value. But overall,
this is what they said then, and the
idea is that nothing has happened. And you
and he's coming out and saying the same
thing, that we now have actionable information.
They don't.
I mean, I've just I continue. And Sane
made the same thing about the Halloween discussion.
They keep doing this, indictments are only accusations,
it drifts into the background, and and nothing
goes any further. But they sure as hell
get a bunch of eager gunthamans and cat
turds and Nick Schur out there going, woah.
You're the greatest because you made something
you you scream something online. As this person
says the same, Cash has made several in
announcements
saying they found out who's funding Antifa in
2025.
As of 02/18/2026,
no formal charges or detailed revelations have been
released, and that's the truth.
There's nothing. Then maybe tomorrow will happen.
But how long can we you know, same
point. How about Obama? Cash, didn't you tell
us Obama's going down? He did. Didn't you
tell us Pelosi was going to jail? He
did.
How long until that happens?
Now here is a Republican. This is Buddy
Carter.
Saying something that I think really speaks to
exactly the mic. I think it's it's two
things. It's about trying to
trick you into thinking this makes sense, but
also just kind of slowly change the understanding
or lack thereof.
See if you catch what he says.
But some of the demands that the
democrats have put forth, we're not gonna be
able to obtain that. We can't have a
warrant every time. And ICE is so important,
and I support ICE
to obtain that. We can't have a warrant
every time.
Oh, okay.
This is so casual. We we can't just
follow the law every time. That's crazy. That's
just just too much work. Kinda like what
Trump was saying about the original due process
point. That's just too much to deal with.
Take the guns first, due process later. It's
always been there for you guys if you're
just not blindly following partisanship.
He's simply saying, it's just too difficult.
That's that doesn't matter. You're absolutely legally required
and constitutionally
bound to have a warrant to do what
they're discussing. It's the same conversation as before.
It's just they just don't care.
Needs to stand out to you guys. If
you truly care about these things, you're being
led. Like I said, like Elon Musk, you're
it's a pied piper. They are literally guiding
you into the very direction that you think
you're fighting.
Here's doctor Oz.
This is just funny in and of itself.
One nice thing about this administration
is you might not like us, but you're
gonna get our version of the truth. Oh,
yeah. Yeah. That's sure that's sure clear. And
he goes on to be like, what do
you mean the facts, though? The facts. The
facts. It's like, oops. Too late. You already
said it. It's kinda funny to me. Very
well I don't I he probably did mean
what he believes with the facts, but I
think it's Freudian slip. You know? They don't
you're gonna get our version of the truth.
Well, isn't that exactly what the Democrats were
saying? It's my truth, and all your Republicans
were like, you're so dumb. There's only one
truth. I agree.
Well, here we are with the Republicans going
my truth, and we're our version of the
truth.
There's only one empirical truth, guys. That's for
every single thing we talk about. Now you
may be misunderstood about what that is. You
may believe it and be wrong, but there
is an empirical truth when it comes to
just about anything or anything. That's the reality.
Now here is what Daniel Horowitz is showing
you. Red states
red states arresting their own people for speaking
up against agenda twenty thirty, land grab for
the AI data centers.
In fact, here, I'm gonna grab this really
quickly, actually. I'm gonna get into this in
the next show,
most likely tomorrow.
But I just wanna show you this because
it is wild.
This is from Jessica Rojas.
I'm gonna get tomorrow, most likely, depending on
what happens, I'm gonna get into more of
the AI data center or kinda tech side
of things.
But just on this point, this is just
another report. Data a single AI data center
in in Philadelphia
just secured 400,000
gallons of water per day. As we keep
telling you, one little engagement
spends
more than you would believe or wastes, uses,
utilizes.
That's enough to serve four hundred thousand two
thousand three hundred homes. While we're told to
conserve every drop, big tech is buying up
40% of the town's excess capacity for $14,000,000.
But you are the problem. Remember that.
How insane.
We will get into that more. The point,
again, is that we're talking about this AI
data center being driven or the the agenda
being driven by more than ever Donald Trump's
administration, by Lutnick, by Elon Musk, by the
whole thing. They are rabid about this, stopping
trying to, and in fact, many ways doing
so, stopping states from being able to regulate
their own process, which is unconstitutional.
People are being arrested for speaking out against
AI data centers.
This is this is I mean, we need
to really start recognizing that this is it's
not just one thing or the other. Whether
it's left or right, by the way. Same
point. They don't care about what they want
you to think they care about. It's only
insofar as they you they use it insofar
as to get you to think that you're
that they're on your side.
These people don't care about any whether it's
woke ideology or climate change. It's I mean,
some of them absorb these things, but at
the core point, guys,
they're willing I mean, right now, you realize
they were telling you that they were gonna
be fighting all this stuff. 2030, the great
reset. And now, do you have Republicans speaking
up and they're getting kicked out by Republicans?
Wake up.
Bill Mitchell.
As as we're as we're talking about all
of this,
remember remember,
Rubio was called a rhino. Every the the
MAGA team hated him and said, that's not
even possible. He won't be the guy. And
then he became the guy, and they said,
oh, he's great.
JD Vance, same point. Both of those men
sitting there
said Trump was a moron, said he was
a loser, said he was terrible, said he
was stupid. All of it's out there.
Rubio hates the guy. It's been going on
forever. Vance action like, brief like, right before
this all happened and Peter Thiel handpicked him
for the vice presidency,
he was calling Trump an idiot.
So he says, bookmark this. I'm predicting that
JD Vance will be president for eight years,
and then Marco Rubio president for eight years
after that.
We may never have a Democrat president in
this nation again.
Oh, great.
Those two forever for for I mean,
think about that. For sixteen years, he's predicting
that we're gonna have just extension of the
Trump administration, right, like it is right now,
which would exactly line up with what I
think is happening in the world.
And these are the people
most MAGA people don't like those guys, at
least as it was before we got the
team sport politics overtaking the whole conversation.
So keeping all this in mind,
here's what Trump's administration
is part of. Now let's not forget,
back in 2020, Derek wrote this article called
the vaccine bait and switch.
As millions pulled from WHO,
Trump gives billions to Ga Gates founded Gavi.
Now as we pointed out at the time,
and even, it was briefly covered on children's
health defense before I think basically got called
out even though it was true, and they
pulled it back because they didn't think it
was. I mean, we went over all this
at the time.
It was it's very real. And if the
whole point was that at the end of
the day, it was shown very clearly that
he moved money away
and all of his supporters were like, we
told you he's fighting the the you know,
the the WHO and all the rest of
the global stuff. Okay. And then gave money
to Gavi, which was on the record.
And Gavi was giving far more than that
to WHO. So you could see how this
ultimately just changed hands. And all he did
was put the money into Bill Gates' Gavi
hands, which then went right back to WHO.
And ultimately ended up being more than it
would have been in the first place. That
is a standard oil analogy. Right?
You're breaking it up. No. You're not. You're
just breaking it up but giving them more
power, which is what breaking it up was
meant to do in the first place. Stop
that power.
This is a manipulation. Now this is 2020.
Now since people see this and we saw
this this administration come back around, people were
like, are they gonna do it again?
But my opinion, it had to be a
different style because people were paying attention. So
here we are.
This person is johnfleetwood
dot com on Substack. Congress bypasses Kennedy's withdrawal
from Bill Gates' Gavi vaccine cartel with new
bill. Funding through State Department.
You think that's by accident?
Here's the bill itself, h r seven zero
zero six, financial services and general government and
national security department of state and related programs.
Appropriations Act twenty twenty six. So this came
out
on the fifteenth last month.
So, the House of Representatives
last month, and again,
Republican dominated
or or majority, rather,
last month passed a sweeping federal spending bill
that makes $3,500,000,000
available for pandemic related purposes
under the authority of the State Department,
granting the agency broad discretion to fund pandemic
response and global health security programs
overseas.
I mean, just the idea
that they're funding pandemic response with what they've
been saying, I find interesting. Now not everybody
is of the mind that these things are
all inherently bad, but mostly Republicans, I argue,
were promised very different things. I think that's
very relevant.
So what we're gonna show here
let me type this out real quick, is
ultimately that this is something that is
going to continue not just through Gavi, but
the larger agenda, which I think most of
you already know
because you watch this show and others that
are being honest about this, but
one second.
So continuing,
the bill also makes the funds available to
Bill Gates' vaccine cartel, GAVI, the Global Alliance
for Vaccines and Immunization,
despite HHS's secretary,
Robert, f Kennedy junior
withdrawing American funding from GAVI in June.
Remember, they didn't stop the mRNA direction as
much as they as the narrative became that,
like for the hundredth time, I can prove
to you whether it's showing you Comirnaty shot
from 2025 and 2026 that is right now
being used and is mRNA, or the others
that are also currently being worked on that
are also mRNA, or the reality of his
own statement that said that, said they weren't
going to end at all. It's just weird
how clearly it said that and people just
went like, it's ending, because that was a
narrative control discussion.
But Gavi was only one part of this.
By routing
pandemic eligible funding through the State Department rather
than HHS,
Congress appears to be preserving and potentially restoring
US support for GAVI through a foreign policy
funding channel, effectively bypassing the prior withdrawal ordered
by secretary Kennedy. Maybe that was the whole
design,
Or maybe Kennedy actually wants to stop this,
and he's been fighting through the administration. You
can decide. Either way, it needs to represent
the entirety of the Trump direction.
The new legislation, h h r seven zero
zero six, formally tied to the financial services
and general government and national security department of
state related programs appropriation act twenty twenty six,
was approved by the house on January 14
by 341
to 79 vote and has since been received
in the Senate, clearing a major procedural hurdle
toward becoming law. Now, I get the sense
it's gonna pass the same way in the
Senate. I hope not. The truth, though, is
that this is something that
I mean, I think especially when you see
the full full government agenda, most of what's
in this seems to be in line with
what they all stand with. But what I'm
gonna show you are things that most Republicans
would say no to, but I'll show you
most of them voting yes on it. You
can see which representatives vote yes, I'll show
you that in a second, Buried within the
the bill's state department buried within the bill's
state department for an appro operations section is
a 3,531,975,000
appropriation for global health programs.
$3,500,000,000,
a funding account that the bill explicitly states
shall be made available for pandemics and other
infectious disease outbreaks, along with global health security
initiatives.
While the bill does not earmark a fixed
dollar amount exclusively for pandemics,
this statutory language authorizes the entire $3,500,000,000
pool to be used for pandemic purposes at
the State Department's discretion
without setting up a capital requiring further congressional
approval. So all you did was make this
way, way worse.
There's no I mean, not like they cared
about Congress anyway, but now you literally don't
even need to pretend that matters. And there's
no cap, no congressional approval. And we're talking
about the State Department. You're talking about the
Department of War overlap here, guys. This is
about not well, you could not that I
think HHS was
some altruistic int institution,
but it's quite a bit different than the
State Department. These are peep this is we're
talking about clandestine operations here, the weirdness of
that being through them, or rather to be
more accurate, the m the appropriate connection.
That this is what it's always been about.
And they're just it's sort of like the
USAID
closing and just being absorbed in the State
Department. It didn't close. They just showed you
what was always happening. It's an
operation.
So is this.
That's what I read it as anyway. Now
it says h r seven zero zero six
when introduced by on January 12 by representative
Tom Cole, Republican, advanced through the house appropriations
and budget committees, and passed after multiple floor
debates and recorded votes.
Bills now pending senate consideration.
And just to show you right now, this
is something that was literally posted publicly as
being supported by the direct executive branch.
The administration
supports HR seven zero zero six.
K. That this is executive office of the
president, the directly from the gov from The
United States Government of the executive branch, or
rather, the executive branch of the United States
government. So that's really important for where this
goes.
So let's go through this.
Introduced one twelve, the bill provides,
a, fiscal year 2026
appropriations to several federal departments and agencies for
activities and programs related to financial services, general
government, national security,
administration of foreign affairs, and foreign assistance.
I mean, the idea of foreign assistance in
general seems to be pretty I mean, America
first is what we keep being told.
Now, foreign assistance is something that all every
part of our government stresses, even though it
seems to be something that most Republicans don't
even acknowledge is happening.
Whether Israel, The Ukraine, or anything else. Far
more than that. It's going to Africa. It's
going all around the world.
How is that America first?
Now, may maybe you agree maybe you think
it's supposed to be happening. My argument is
not even about should or should not. It's
about whether or not this applies or
fits in with the agenda that's being stated
by this government.
Now here or just to show you again,
just this was you know, we already read
it, but just on the actual actions has
been received in the Senate at the fifteenth,
and it's ongoing right now. Now, actually, now,
I know that I think about it. I
probably I should I could have found the
Senate version and maybe seen if there's any
more movement on that, but we'll follow-up on
that tomorrow if if there is.
So here's the actual bill.
Let's go through some of this. There's there's
quite a bit in here. A lot. In
fact, it might stand out even more like
some of these just ish it's a it's
a huge spending bill.
But what I wanna cut to is specifically
the point he's making,
and then the larger point of a few
things that I just happen to find that
I think stand out.
It's right down here.
So the bilateral economic assistance,
funds appropriated the president under global health programs.
This
show it's the, that basically says provided that
this well, it start you know, how do
you think it's always read? It starts by
saying for necessary expenses to carry out provisions
and list the $3,500,000,000
to remain available until 2027.
Now it says state provided that this amount
shall be made available for training, equipment, and
technical assistance to build the capacity of public
health institutions
and organizations in developing countries.
Right out of the gate, we're talking about
building pandemic public
health institutions
in foreign I mean, why why is that
even something we would even discuss funding right
now? And for such activities as, one, child
survival and maternal health programs,
okay, immunization and oral rehydration programs,
Other health, nutrition, water, and sanitation programs, which
directly address the needs of mothers and children
in related education programs all around the world.
Assistance for children displaced and or orphaned by
causes other than AIDS. Programs for the prevention,
treatment, and control of and research of HIV
and AIDS, tuberculosis, polio, malaria, and other infectious
diseases, including neglected tropical diseases. Oh, good. Let's
go on a limb. Let's go look at
the ones that nobody's talking about. And for
assistance to communities several severely affected by HIV
and AIDS, including children infected or affected by
AIDS.
So right there before we begin an export.
So that's,
again, not about may maybe you believe that's
what we should be doing. That's for you
to decide. It's not my point.
This is not what the Republicans are claiming
that their government are trying to accomplish.
This is not just Republicans. This is a
bigger bill, but this has been predominantly supported
or has been supported by the majority of
Republicans and clearly by the White House. So
if you believe Trump is trying to fight
all these things in regard to what Democrats
were doing, explain to me why these same
things are happening.
Number six, disaster preparedness training for health crises.
Right there.
Number seven, programs to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to an unanticipated
and emerging global health threats,
including zoonotic diseases and family planning reproductive health.
Provided further that funds appropriate under this paragraph
may be made available for The United States
contributions to the GAVI Alliance
and to multilateral vaccine development partnerships to support
epidemic preparedness.
That is everything
Republicans were calling out in a broad sense.
In particular,
the GAVI Alliance.
This is just blatantly stated as making sure
that this money can flow to the GAVI
Alliance at their discretion,
and this is openly supported by the current
Trump administration.
I find it to be insane based on
what we know. In fact, but I shouldn't
say insane. I find it to be it
should be insane for people to believe what
he tells you.
If you pay attention, this is exactly what
I would have expected.
None they don't believe what they always try
to pretend they believe.
In addition, for necessary expenses to carry out
the provisions of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961,
for the prevention, treatment, and control of, and
research of HIV and AIDS,
Another $5,000,000,000.
5.8, in fact, to remain available until 2030,
which shall be appointed directly to the Department
of State. Well, gee. I wonder if that
money might just end up in the hands
of Israel or something like that. Thing is
how there's all these weird things moving around.
Well, I I jump ahead. We'll get to
the point where it lists Israel 38 times
in this bill. United States' contribution to the
global fund to fight AIDS. Tuberculosis,
malaria, global fund. I mean, the global fund,
Why why would a group claiming to fight
globalism and all this different conversation and in
fact, push back against finding any of these
things suddenly put forward
$1,200,000,000
to
to the global fund to fight AIDS?
I mean, it's it's contradictory to what we're
being told. International humanitarian assistance.
Now, to make my point clear, I've said
this before. There's plenty of examples like this
that I might argue, you know, if is
possible and individuals want to do so, would
be net would be important for individuals to
do. I don't I'm not of the mind
that government should be involved with charity at
all. In fact, I think that's what becomes
a business and makes it a problem. But
aside from that,
in regard to these, you know, the HIV
and whatever else, you know, the point is
not, like I said, about whether
that ultimately, if individuals
want to support or help people around the
world, that that's always been the case. But
what this becomes is an industry that's used
to manipulate you, and money flows through this.
And in historic examples like India or other
places, it ends up being the opposite. Whether
it's with GMOs or AIDS treatment or polio
vaccines from Bill Gates.
It hurts them. They're tested on. They're manipulated.
For and this is under humanitarian assistance. For
necessary expenses to enable the secretary of state
to carry out the provisions of section four
ninety one of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961
for international disaster relief,
rehabilitation,
reconstruction assistance.
Did we just talk about this? Now you're
talking about rebuilding other places in the world
if they have disasters, like Israel, for example.
And it says, and the Migration of Refugee
Assistance Act.
Activities to meet refugee and migration needs. Okay.
Here we are talking about Minnesota
and,
you know, the fraud of refugees.
And and Massey making this point before saying,
look. Right here, in this bill, they allowed
it's a previous bill. They allowed money to
flow to the same program where where fraud
is happening in Minnesota.
I mean, how can you not see that?
That was the same people that were screaming
about stopping the fraud. So on top of
that, not again to say that this shouldn't
be happening, you can decide whether you think
it should or not. It says,
activities to meet refugee and migration needs, salaries,
expenses of personal and dependents as authorized by
the Foreign Service Act of 1980,
allowances to as authorized by sections five nine
two one through five nine two five of
five zero five, United States Code, purchase and
hire of passenger motor vehicles and services is
authorized by section three zero nine of five.
$5,000,000,000,
400,000 400,000,000.
$5,400,000,000
to remain available
until expended, of which not less than
6,500,000.0
shall be available to refugees resettling in Israel.
So on top of the general point that
$5,400,000,000
to be given to people resettling in refugee
positions,
we're they're talking about 6,500,000.0
specifically for Israelis resettling
in Israel, or rather specifically
refugees resettling in Israel. Meaning, anybody that they
wanna claim is, you know, somewhat connected to
Jewish religion, they wanna bring in Israel and
displace Palestinians.
United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund.
For necessary expenses to carry out the provisions
of section two c of the Migration Refugee
Assistance Act, a $100,000,000
to remain available
provided that amounts be made available by this
act
that are in excess of limitation contained in
paragraph two. Oh, son of a gun.
Well, I just lost that.
Sorry, guys. They hit back on that thing
on accident, then I lost it. But, oh,
oh, you don't have this here. So that's
I'm glad I did that, actually. The point
was about after this, just searching for the
term. So I believe we had this here.
Yeah. Oh, you know what? I was almost
done anyway. So this is where I was.
Simply simple point saying the amount that made
available,
so it's $100,000,000
for international humanitarian assistance.
For for for specifically migration refugee assistance act.
This is exactly what you guys were all
calling out. So if you believe this shouldn't
be happening, then why is the Trump administration
supporting a a a bill that allows that
to happen?
Democracy Fund.
For necessary expenses to carry out the provisions
of the Foreign Assistance Act 1961,
says, for the promotion of democracy globally.
Sure sounds like exactly what we're fighting under
Democrats, doesn't it? Including to carry out the
purposes of section five zero two.
$205,000,000
to remain available until 2027,
which shall be made available for Human Rights
and Democracy Funds of the Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights and Labor, Department of State. Always
funny how Department of State's included, which means
it could go towards anything other than that
too. That funds appropriated under this heading that
are made available to the National Endowment for
Democracy. You know, basically USAID and other form.
It is another regime change engine.
So on all those things are crazy to
me.
Now on top of that, though,
just back to this one. Check this out.
So this is a bill for 2026
about
US government spending. Right?
So explain for me why Israel is listed
35 times in this bill.
35 times. Now you realize you could it
could be a section for Israel. Right? No.
No. No. This is the entirety of the
bill peppered with things about Israel.
The Israeli Arab scholarship program that that the
US government wants to spend millions of dollars
on. Why? Why is that your responsibility as
an American?
Or 4.5 oh, that's the one we just
read about refugees resettling in Israel.
This one,
anti terrorism demanding related programs.
Damn it. I this was frustrating. I had
all this highlighted.
I just didn't pat caption it because I
could I could search using the word Israel,
but then I refresh the page. So I
don't know what I'm reading for. But the
simple point, I just gonna go through it
quickly, is that Israel is listed in this
for
this one's $870,000,000,
specifically for anti terrorism and and and programs
that relate directly to Israel and programs that
relate to, you know, calling out Palestinians.
None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made
available by this act
will may be used to move The United
States Embassy to the state of Israel oh,
let me read it again since I'm making
it sound confusing.
None of the funds appropriated. So millions of
millions of dollars appear for something.
None of the funds appropriated or otherwise
made available by this
act may be used to move the United
States embassy
to the state of Israel
to a location other than Jerusalem.
So you have the government of the United
States, largely Trump's administration, clearly being driven by
Israel to say, which
to understand
this. You're not allowed to give this money
up here. It has to do with the
diplomatic facilities.
To any to anything
involved with moving
the US embassy
to Israel anywhere other than Jerusalem.
So, basically, this they're they're using this to
say, no matter what, it has to go
to Jerusalem, which is a it's a contentious
point.
It's a it's a small thing, but the
point is that they're folding into this bill
about American US government government
funding
that you have to make sure that stays
in Jerusalem or moves there. Otherwise, you won't
be funded. It's just it's a it's a
manipulative point that might affect Americans because Israel
wants what it wants.
This one?
The chapter five entitled one of the Emergency
Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2023
is amended under the heading loan guarantees to
Israel.
Meaning that the Emergency Work Time Supplemental Progurations
Act included money loan guarantees to Israel. And
this is part of what Janice Gurl discusses
in the article she put out for TLAP,
how American tax dollars prop up Israel's zombie
economy.
You ever read this? It will blow your
mind. There is very clear illegality here, where
you have the the US government
allowing Israel to basically rob Americans. You've got
corporations and industry, and people in government, by
the way, using this situation,
which in fact breaks the law where they're
they're forcing you to buy their bonds even
though they know that they're losing money.
They have a fiduciary responsibility
to make money for the people investing, and
yet they know they're doing this because they
wanna support Israel.
And they're rapidly losing money.
I mean, it's just it's just over the
top, guys, and your government is allowing this.
Your government is allowing you to inadvertently
supplement the Israeli agenda.
Commercial leasing, defense articles notwithstanding, any other provision
of law,
it says of the Arms Export Control Act
may be used to provide financing to Israel
and Egypt and NATO, other countries,
but specifically list Israel,
And that comes back to millions of dollars
up here. These are all different spots.
Palestinian statehood. It says
none of the funds appropriated in this title
may an act may be provided to support
a Palestinian state unless
the state secretary of state determines
that the governing entity of Palestinian state has
demonstrated a firm commitment to peaceful coexistence with
the state of Israel. I mean, think about
writing that into a bill that you're saying
we won't allow this in general
unless unless what? I guess
what? The Palestinians
at large? Hamas? The Palestinian Authority? Like, they
create a situation where you can always argue
that's not what they think. Until they've demonstrated
a commitment to peaceful coexistence? You mean aside
from Israel murdering every day?
It's it's, you know, these point it just
goes through this nonstop. Why is this in
in the US government
bill? Now, some of this does have to
do with foreign spending, but that's the whole
point in general. Why is that happening at
all? But it goes on and on and
on. I mean, there are all these different
things about Israel having what they want. You
can't spend here unless Israel gets what it
needs.
The president exercises the waiver of authority. What
was this one?
And the Palestinian Authority is acting to counter
incitement of violence against Israelis.
Like, so basically saying that until they do
this to protect Israelis, that this money won't
go where it needs to go. And so
the whole thing is riddled with this stuff.
Meeting the obligations of the
peace treaty, which was that one? Sorry. These
were all highlighted before. I'm trying to jump
through quickly.
$3,000,000,000
available for grants only for Israel.
That's what it says.
Of the funds appropriated to the act,
not less than $3,300,000,000
available for Israel. And by the way, that's
on top of everything else we're dealing with,
guys. They have a memorandum of understanding for
$3,800,000,000
a year. This just is more on top
of more on top of more.
Anyway, I'll leave it there since I don't
it's just guys, it should blow your mind.
That's 22.
There's 35. 35 different references to Israel in
this bill.
Oh, here was the the voting.
Of course, I closed that and I lost
the highlight, but the point was here, 188
republicans. People like Laura, what was it? Jim
Jordan voted yes. Nancy Mace. Oh, wait.
Yeah. She voted nay. I'm glad I checked.
I don't wanna miss misreport that. But there
was somebody else too. There oh, it was,
Stefanik, of course, voted yes.
The the these are the the Republicans
are all over this thing.
188 of them voted yes. I just think
that stands out, guys. And, again, the White
House stated very clearly, they support HR seven
zero zero six. That means they support the
funding to Israel. They support the funding for
refugees. They support the funding for immigrants in
this country. They support the funding
for Gavi.
That's what that means. Now on the point
of the overlap to vaccines,
one example that stands out to me that
I think is relevant,
one called Centivax. Because we've talked about the
universal flu vaccine that goes back to Trump's
first administration well before.
Fauci, the whole thing.
So this is just the guy who I
this is, I think Orwell said this to
me. It's mentioned as,
a good thing. You know? Remember all those
variants and how crazy it was? If that's
even what happened. Well, check it out. We
have this new thing that smashes the mutations.
Okay. Well, here's the article. This is from
02/12/2026.
Sentibax is what it's called. Doses first participants
in the universal flu vaccine. Well, first off,
the company reports that more than $26,000,000
in in dilute non dilutive funding from organizations
like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who
is very close to Trump, The Coalition for
Epidemic Prayer Disease, that's CEPI, very close to
Bill Gates, funds him directly. The National Institutes
of Health. Oh, that's the US government. Oh,
the United States Department of Agriculture. Oh, it's
also the US government. The Military Infectious Diseases
Research Program, the US Naval Medical Research Command,
and the Department of Defense.
Oh, great. So the US government directly supports
this shot. Okay. Let's keep going.
Sent to backs, initiative. And just to be
clear, this is 2026. This is already happening.
It's already being tested.
Just to make this is another post. Ads
do it. Same point, really.
26,000,000,
Bill Gates, CEPI, NIH,
US government. Okay.
Here's Bill Gates directly
connected to the Centivax universal fund, the funding
of it anyway. The Gates Foundation, which is
not the same as saying Bill Gates, but
it does the connections there. Same
point. Here, CEPI and Gavi have a direct
connection.
They work together.
Right?
That's been going on for a while.
Centivax
secures $45,000,000
back in 2025,
specifically for this mRNA shot, which is not
really being regarded as such when you get
into the meat of it. But I think
it's interesting that they don't want that to
be discussed, but that's what this is. Sentivax
has discussed or successfully raised 45,000,000
first
on their experimental universal mRNA flu vaccine. So
if you right now find look at the
conversation,
not it seems like they're very willfully not
mentioning mRNA, and I think we know why.
SentiVax vaccine incorporates 22 different mRNA molecules encoding
proteins from diverse flu strains. Great. So you
get 22 different bad reactions. Fantastic.
So here, going back to 2025,
is Donald Trump's administration saying HHS, NIH,
both of which support this, launched next generation
universal vaccine platform
for flu.
Now, they don't make this about mRNA.
Very well could be something totally disconnected. I'm
not saying these are the same program. But
I think the point first is to recognize
that these are the same agenda.
And then if we recognize that they're the
same agenda and we can recognize that Bill
Gates has been in the ear of Trump,
they've met, what, five times since this administration.
Here he is going Bill Gates has dinner
with Trump, left impressed by what Trump had
to say. And the point here is that,
okay, you can prove quite literally that Trump
is very
Bill Gates has been discussing vaccine with Trump
for since last administration.
I mean, that's very clear.
Trump's super interested in the universal flu vaccine.
What does that mean? That's 2028.
Bill Gates is donating 12,000,000 to help develop
a universal flu vaccine. That's back in 2018
as well. Trump opens the gates to universal
flu vaccine,
2019.
Here's one in 2038 as well. Bill Gates
got president Trump fired up about the universal
flu vaccine. Maybe he got a job offer.
And we know that Trump's administration in 2025
has leaned into the self amplifying shots, which
we've shown here, which are happening, which is
what Gates was basically pushing. So coming back
this before we keep going forward.
If we know that Gates is close on
this and is in his ear about this,
let's make sure we're clear on this. Right?
So this is just a a financial connection.
You could argue that there's nothing there, that
it just the connection's there, but that's just
coincidence. Certainly possible.
My thought
here is that you can see these overlapping
connections to Gavi. So we'll start with the
bill. Right? You got a bill that comes
out, and it is clearly stating that the
money will go to Gavi from the Trump
administration or from the US government. So Gavi
gets that money, but Gavi is not connected
to this shot. Right? Except Gavi has a
partnership with CEPI, and and Bill Gates is
directly working with CEPI in funding them. And
Bill Gates is directly connected to this shot.
And on top of that, the shot itself
is clearly funded and supported by the Department
of Defense and US and the US government.
But the point to be made is that
that funding started before Trump's administration,
but they haven't stopped it.
All of this matters. And so two things
I'm showing you is that the shot does
continue and is supported by the government,
because they could stop this. The same with
the rest of them. They and Arfkey junior
yanked all that back in in mid okay.
You can show that they support the shot.
They support the vaccine direction. They support all
of this. And that you can show that
the GAVI direction where they're funding it directly
continues funding the mRNA CEPI,
Bill Gates direction.
Now what you can even argue that they're
too down to realize that's happening. I find
that hard to believe. It's important to recognize,
I think, that this is not just a,
you know, an overlapping coincidence, but rather a
shell game of funding to make sure that
we don't put these things together. You can
decide for yourself.
Here's Bill Gates speaking about his dinner with
Trump. I met with Donald Trump since the
election.
Yeah. I had a chance to go have
a a long and actually quite
intriguing dinner with him. What did you discuss?
What was intriguing?
Well, we touched on a lot of things.
It was over three hours to my surprise.
It was, you know, just he and I,
his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and the
person who helps manage things for me, Larry
Cohen. So the four of us sat there
and,
was quite wide ranging. You know, global health's
the area that I work in, and
such amazing things have happened and can happen
there.
I spoke a lot about HIV and that
the foundation's literally working on a a cure
for that. We're at an early stage, and
so, you know, he,
in the COVID days,
accelerated the vaccine innovation. So I, you know,
was asking him
if maybe the same kind of thing could
be done here, and we both got, I
think, pretty excited about that. We talked about
polio,
where, you know, we're very close to getting
that done. But
if you if you stop,
it'll spread back.
And so I explained
why it's been tough in Pakistan, Afghanistan.
We've had cases show up in Gaza. We
have cases in Africa, and he was fascinated
to hear
what he could do to
maximize the chance that during the next four
years that incredible milestone will be achieved.
I felt like he was,
you know, energized and,
you know, looking forward to helping to drive
innovation.
You know, I I was I was frankly
impressed with how well he showed a lot
of interest in
the the issues I I brought up.
Now you you could still argue that he
made that up, you know, whatever. It's crushing
everything.
But I think actions speak louder as always,
and here we are. This after that, by
the way,
Trump admin leans into self amplifying shots as
I've shown you many times. One of the
examples that are that he mentions by name,
Art Torres. I I show this one because
it's important that it's
COVID nineteen shot, which should alarm people that
he when they tell you they're stopping this,
and specifically mRNA. And even more than that,
specifically self amplifying.
That's still going on. That's out there now.
So too is the Comerity shot that's also
mRNA. And I argue the same when you
understand the history of this shot as self
amplifying, but that's for you to decide. Either
way, the point is '25, 2026.
COVID nineteen shot right now. That's out there.
That's being given. The Trump administration Trump just
said again that he thinks this is the
most successful thing ever. I don't know how
we can't be honest about this. Now on
top of that, to bring it around even
more, Centivax has two different contracts with the
Department of Health and Human Services.
One for a snake vax venom for $3,000,000
that goes through 2026,
as well as another one around an anti
a a a avian flu vaccine to 2028,
both of which are funded by this current
administration. And I mean, like, as of 2026.
So now some of you might not, you
know, be of the mind that every vaccine
is bad or whatever, but realize his core
is based. We're very adamant about that. RFK
Jr leading a pretty strong campaign
to not get rid of every vaccine, but
to reevaluate, like, the entire core set system
of all of them, and that's and that's
not what they're doing.
They said gold standard, and then they put
out plenty of them. They didn't even use
a placebo. Well, I don't know if he's
just being played or he's lying or what
we're looking at, guys, but we gotta be
honest about all this. Now last point
that I think just even more so demonstrates
the the you know, what this administration or
all of our government really, but right now
for those that need to see it, that
this administration
is playing everybody.
Robert Kadlek,
the man behind Trump's biowarfare policy.
Now there's a few things I'll get into,
but I really this is a very long
article and it is worth your time. And
I'll include the one that's did that Whitney
wrote for TLav back in the COVID nineteen
time frame.
But the the the the subtitle is Robert
Kadlek, whoever was the, assistant secretary for preparedness
and response during Trump's first administration, which gave
him control over the,
nuclear stockpile and all kinds of stuff.
A veteran of biowarfare with long standing connections
to the national security state and corrupt government
contractors, as well as controversial COVID nineteen policies,
has now become the head
of counter proliferation
at the Department of War. Oh, you for
a group that's doing the opposite, that seems
like an easy job.
They're not pro like, the idea of the
of the, nonproliferation
treaty, the the nuclear they're supposed to be
rolling back their nuclear arsenal. They're not doing
that. Trump's the one spearheading the tactical nukes.
So I just think that's an interesting thing
for him to step into when they're not
doing that. But either way, maybe there's more
to that than than, you know, maybe I'm
misunderstanding the counter proliferation point. I believe that's
what it means. But it says, Cadillac most
recently served at the Department of Health and
Human Services
as its assistant secretary for preparedness and response
in the first Trump administration,
where he played a crucial role in deploying
developing early COVID nineteen responses that clearly hurt
a lot of people, guys, and policies as
well as conducting global pandemic simulations
the year before COVID nineteen crises. Yeah. That's
this guy, guys. In 2019.
Right?
Event two zero one. These are the very
people that you guys have always been calling
out. He just got welcomed right back into
the administration.
These policies were sharply criticized by the man
who is now head of HHS,
RFK Junior.
Amid the silence from Kennedy, which is deafening,
and most often most other COVID era critics
regarding Cadillac, the seasoned government operative was finally
confirmed for his Pentagon post by the senate
in December.
His onetime critics aside, hardly any mainstream news
outlets covered Kadlek's nomination or confirmation despite his
new role bearing significant importance. Why would that
be?
These people out here screaming bloody murder over
positions where it's, like, you know, politically contentious,
Kavanaugh, whatever else. Well, more so with that,
you know, that's a judge example. But in
many cases, the confirmations for Trump's administration, they
were fighting tooth and nail.
And this happens and no one even I
don't I don't even see anybody talk about
this.
Doesn't that seem strange? What it shows me
is that this is what they this is
the important stuff. They want you all batting
at nothing over there at the cat toy
and they dangle in front of you. But
this this is what changes things.
Or that's the way you could read it.
This is despite not only his hand in
early COVID policies,
but his role in a simulation that eerily
preceded and seemingly predicted the two thousand one
anthrax attacks, which figures very close to Cadillac
likely orchestrated in an effort to bioterrorize the
American public into supporting military ventures abroad. Now
Kadlek, as the assistant secretary of preparedness and
response, had some level of involvement in event
two zero one, but what she's referencing here
is the anthrax discussion. The the and in
fact, I'll jump really quickly to the larger
series she did for TLav, Engineering Contagion.
One of them specifically,
All Roads oh, I mean, it overlaps the
whole series, but all roads lead to dark
winter is about the anthrax lie and the
manipulation of our government and what that led
to, which overlap with nine eleven, and it
just continues to this very day. These people
are directly involved in all of this.
And then it says, which figures very close
to Cadillac likely orchestrated
in an effort to bioterrorize
the American public into supporting military ventures abroad?
I am only just now realizing somebody's note
they gave me about my microphone. Hopefully, it's,
let me know if the microphone sounds any
better when I just move it like that.
Let me know.
Now at the Pentagon, Cadillac, a crucial figure
in cultivating the national security based public health
system,
Being built out right now, guys, that's part
of the control grid, will hold vast power
over the nation's weapons of mass destruction policy,
ranging from nuclear deterrents developing capabilities to counter
WMD threats and interagency
coordination
and international
engagement
on countering weapons of mass destruction,
policy and strategy as part of the Trump
administration's efforts to reshape the way the DOD
meets and responds
to WMD threats.
If Cadillac's record is any indication of how
he will govern at this new post, then
The US will take a firm step towards
the fulfillment
of the neoconservative
policy doctrine that came to rise during the
Bush eras the Bush years.
This doctrine envisions that the empowerment of the
most
secretive sects of the national security state,
a permanent state of war and emergency, the
final the the financialization
of catastrophe,
and the consolidation of power. Oops. Sorry to
say, guys. It looks like we're already there.
Cadillac often un often,
unnoticeable and out of sight has long played
a crucial role in the implementation of these
goals for decades.
There's tons that you should read in here,
guys. I'll include, on the way out, one
show I did back in 2023,
where Robert Kadlek was one of the people
who spoke up and said vaccine research caused
COVID.
And now
they're continuing vaccine research and specifically mRNA, specifically
self amplifying. So it makes you wonder why
that makes sense. But on top of that,
the specific part of that series, and this
is, part two or part three, part three,
the head of the Hydra.
The rise of Robert Cadillac.
Now depending on what goes on the next
day, tomorrow, you know, we may get into
this more in-depth because this and I've gone
through this in the past. It's very much
worth your time to understand how this connects
to a lot of different things. But the
main point, guys,
is that this is the last thing you
would would expect from a group that's trying
to change things.
Like, you wanna talk about the deep state,
whatever you think that is, look in it
right in the face, guys. This is and
and I don't mean that he is the
deep state. My point is that that's the
behind the scenes kind of never ending power.
These people are not elected. That's what that
really talks about. And they're
you know, going back to the Epstein network
point from Comorico Macian. You know, that we're
right now seeing that there is a different
another way that things actually function.
What they want from you is to just
get tired of the of the uncomfortable reality
of that and just fall back into the
comfortable suffocation of the government narrative.
Don't do it.
You're even being the truth can be uncomfortable
as hell, guys, but it's still the truth.
And I argue that it's far I mean,
my personal worldview is I would rather deal
with that and understand what's going on than
just be
ignorant, you know, blissfully ignorant about what's going
on around me. That's just me, though. Because
personally, I like to change those things for
the better than ignore them and put my
head in the sand.
Thank you for tuning in today.
Yeah, why not? Let's end with this. Since
I said that at the said that
before, we'll end with this clip here for
you.
It's a good clip. Stay tuned if you
if you have a couple minutes.
It's the truth about Zionism. And I think
I actually do think it's actually very relevant
to the larger point being made today because
this, in my opinion, is a central part
of why all this is happening, whether that's
because of the Trump administration in particular or
because of the larger Zionist implications of all
of it.
But I'll leave you there today, guys. Thank
you for tuning in.
Appreciate your support.
Genuinely, as always, we couldn't do this without
you.
There it is. Alright. Thank you for tuning
in, guys. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
We will move the
to the eternal capital of the Jewish people,
Jerusalem.
No.
No. I was with him until he said
the eternal capital of the Jewish people. President
Trump has the right to make whatever foreign
policy he wants. If he feels that Miami
Beach is best to recognize as the capital
of Israel, that's his business. He can do
it. But once he starts talking about the
Jewish people, now he's encroaching upon religion, and
now that's my domain. There is absolutely no
political relationship between the Jewish people and Jerusalem.
It's merely a holy city. The Jewish people
don't have a capital. We never had a
capital. Countries have capitals.
States have capitals.
That's the definition of a capital. Capital, dictionary,
noun, the most important city or town of
a country or region. Now the Jewish people
are not a country or region. The Jewish
people are a religious community. We pray towards
Jerusalem, but we relate to Jerusalem
only as a holy city,
not as a political
capital city of the Jewish people. And all
of those overtures that we make to Jerusalem
and the yearning that Jews have for Jerusalem
is only as a holy city,
not as a capital city. And because it's
a holy city,
it doesn't matter who has sovereignty over it.
Jerusalem is just as holy and just as
much Jerusalem,
whether it's
under the auspices of the Turks
or the Romans or the British or whoever.
It's important to know that the the Zionists
were the ones that
started this business of the capital of the
Jewish people
and it's an idea that conflicts directly with
the teachings of Judaism.
At Mount Sinai in the desert,
the Torah says, the Bible says about us,
that's when we became a people.
The Jewish people aren't a people because of
a land. We're not a people because of
a language. We're not a people because of
a culture. We're a religion and when we
were deputized into the religion, when we accepted
the religion
given to us by God, that's when we
became the Jewish people. We had no land,
no territories, we had no capital city. And
in fact, our commentators say the reason why
God gave the Jews the Torah in the
desert
before they went into the Holy Land was
in order to teach them that land,
country
has nothing to do with your Jewishness. Your
Jewishness is because you accept the religion. Couple
years ago, the Pope went to visit Netanyahu
and Netanyahu's
bragging to the Pope, this is where Jesus
lived in this land and he spoke Hebrew
here.
So the pope corrected him. The pope said
no, Aramaic.
And he he pope was right. Netanyahu was
so Netanyahu says, yeah, yeah, but he understood
Hebrew.
Well, you know, maybe he did, but but
Hebrew was was never the national language of
the Jewish people. It was a holy language,
just like, land of Israel was a holy
land. Oh, by the way, if if you
see the clip and you don't know which
of the two people talking is Netanyahu, which
is the pope,
the pope's the one wearing the yarmulke. Even
if we were to pretend that the Jewish
people have a capital,
that would have nothing to do with whether
Jerusalem should be the capital of Israel, because
Israel's not the Jewish people. Israel has nothing
to do with the old Jewish commonwealth. It's
a country that was created in 1948 when
you hear the Israelis or the Zionists talk
about how,
Jerusalem has a connection with the Jewish people
for two thousand years, three thousand years, four
thousand years. It's all true,
but
that doesn't translate
to, well, therefore, Jerusalem has to be part
of Israel. People think that Israel is some
kind of continuation of a Jewish,
government and but it's not. It it's a
completely different form of government, completely different values,
completely different ideology, and completely different people. These
are not religious Jews that are running the
country. These are atheists.
And yet, the Israeli prime ministers from Ben
Gurion all the way up to Netanyahu
use the bible as an excuse
for ownership of the land. Ben Gurion, he
says the mandate is not our Bible,
but the Bible is our mandate.
This is a man that didn't believe the
Bible was given by God. He didn't believe
God ever spoke to prophets. He didn't believe
it at all.
Neither does Benjamin Netanyahu. It says in the
bible,
watch the Sabbath to keep it holy. Netanyahu
doesn't refrain from work on the Sabbath. It
says not to eat non kosher food in
the bible. Does Netanyahu do that? No. There
is nothing holy in the Bible that Netanyahu
cares about.
The only thing he cares about is his
land. Restorationist,
Protestants,
we call them evangelical Christians today, they existed
hundreds of years before any Jewish Zionist was
ever born. And because
the evangelicals,
the restorationists,
had great influence in Britain, and Britain had
the mandate, the Zionists
very, very much adopted the Christian evangelical interpretation
of the Bible,
and that's what they use today. You'll find
that Benjamin Netanyahu sometimes even espouses Christian evangelical
interpretations of the bible over the Jewish ones.
A number of years ago Netanyahu spoke in
the side of the Auschwitz Concentration Camp and
he mentioned
a prophecy in the book of Yehezkel
about how the prophets
saw dried bones rising from the ground and
growing flesh and becoming alive again. And Netanyahu
said that that prophecy is fulfilled with the
state of Israel because the Jews were dried
bones, and now they grew flesh, and they
are they are real people again. This interpretation
is not found anywhere
in any Jewish source,
because in Judaism,
this is impossible.
But for over a century,
this has been a Christian evangelical interpretation.
The Zionists, when they talk about the Bible,
they're not talking about
the Judaic
version of Judaism and Jewishness.
They're talking really about the Christian evangelical version.
Netanyahu has no right to claim
that
his state is mine.
I was born in America. My father was
born in Poland. My mother's family is from
England. We have nothing to do with Israel.
We're Jews.
We're observant Jews. We're religious Jews.
I wear a yarmulke.
Netanyahu doesn't.
I keep the Shabbos. Netanyahu doesn't. And Israel
is not my nation state in the slightest.
This is a unilateral
claim of the Israelis, of the Zionists,
and it's an assault on my religion. So
too, the claim that Jerusalem is the capital
of the Jewish people because it transforms the
Jewish people from a religious
identity
to a national identity,
to a political identity.
And it's an assault on my religion when
Netanyahu says that because
Jerusalem is so connected to the Jewish people,
therefore, it must be part of the State
Of Israel. Jerusalem's holiness, Jerusalem's value to the
Jewish people has nothing to do with who
owns it, and it certainly
has no reason to be part of the
state of Israel.