This starts, and it's it's really fascinating to
go back. It starts, in 1996
with Netanyahu,
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite
straightforward
and,
and and,
very dangerous.
He says, you know, there are there's Hamas,
there's Hezbollah. They oppose Israel. It's not good
for us to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple the
governments
that that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout The Middle East. And
he actually gave a long list of seven
countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan, and Lebanon.
And systematically,
The United States has done Netanyahu's bidding for
almost thirty years now, going to war with
every one of them except for the big
one, that Netanyahu
so much longs for, which is the war
directly
between The United States and Iran.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective
reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 02/17/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Definitely a few things I want to touch
on before we get into the main thing
that we're discussing today, and it's really kind
of
few different things we've discussed with some new
information today. But based the the thought, the
kind of the reason that this all came
together for today's show was a really well
put together writing from a friend of the
show, Kevorka Omasi, and of Syriana Analysis.
And
something
that we've discussed kind of like the larger
view,
really to cut to the quick of the
point he's making, is the idea that people
are starting to ask questions about the real
nature of the way things work,
the real structure of of of how our
gov you know, of how our societies operate,
what's actually in charge. Are governments guiding this
directions of individual nation states, or is there
something more powerful? Is there more of a
network? You know, and these are conversations that
have been had for a very long time.
But because, as he's arguing in the in
the post we'll get to in the middle
in you know, after the first opening parts
here,
because of the Epstein files.
And not only that, but because of what
that's done and what that's opening, and I
think by necessity or rather by desperation because
of what we're all doing, it has started
to open this this conversation. And I've been
talking about this a lot. People are asking
questions they haven't in in in a very
long time.
And I think it's really important to stand
back and think about as he highlights the
empire
above Epstein or or as he what is
that what he yeah. Above. Make sure you
use the right word he used in the
title. The empire above Epstein.
Now his point in the article
it's it's an article, but the the written
and and verbal conversation he has on YouTube
as well is really about not saying we
know for sure it's one thing or the
other, but just just, again, opening this door
and starting to challenge these classically held beliefs
that are simply not true, that we are
beginning to recognize. Maybe at one point, and
maybe that's, again, what we could strive for,
but what we exist in now is not
what we pretend we live in. The in
in the dynamic of, you know, international law
and the nation states and the government, you
know, it's just not the reality of it,
at least not what's guiding the real outcome.
And I think we're seeing that with what
Epstein is the the network and what it's
showing you, the the your the interconnection
of all of what we're dealing with.
Before we get into all of that and
how that connects with a couple of other
important points we're gonna discuss today, something we've
touched on, Stardust Solutions,
a new point from Apple and QAI,
it really brings this big picture together that
I'm trying to highlight. I wanna point out
one that the that Kamor El Masian is
the one who that the title comes from
his point when we'll get to, The Empire
Above Epstein. And just to really shout out
his amazing work. We don't mention him enough.
He does focused work in on geopolitics, and
he's just outstanding, so make sure you follow
his work. You know, on that note, I
I will make sure I include
a link to his work and his channel,
in the show notes below. And I I
believe I have it as we get into
the show, but I should have had it
pulled up to start. The other thing I
wanna point out was we are right now,
I'm using the the pirate. For those that
that know of our censorship around YouTube, what
we've been doing since then, which is what
we call pirate channels where people send them
in, you know, it's the censorship has has
quieted, at least around our work, for a
while now. And I I've still shifted it
around here and there. I was recently given
a community note a community note, like, I
don't know, so many weeks ago, but hasn't
been happening a lot. And I think for
that purpose, I'm just basically gonna continue using
the one right now that's Pirate Vagabond on
YouTube. If you guys wanna just focus on
that, if you if you're still on YouTube,
which, you know, you know my thoughts, but
recognize that it will be changing. I guarantee
as we get into some new contentious conversation,
they'll start censoring yes, what yet yet again.
But those who just happen to only be
on YouTube, just recognize that we'll always still
be putting content there and everywhere else, but
this channel will be somewhat consistent, I guess,
until that starts happening again just to save
me time. There's so much effort that I
have to go through to or, you know,
to get new things set up and the
channels and so on. And I was really
doing it primarily because I didn't want them
to be able to censor the content so
quickly, but that hasn't been happening as much.
And so we're gonna continue doing that on
any platform that censors us, but just wanted
you guys to know that. So if you
wanted to,
follow that more so than the others, but
keep that in mind. So let's get into
today. It's it's it's really, as as you've
seen and I've discussed a lot over the
years with my shows, it is a large
single point today, and with all the interconnected
points you'll see within the show. But keep
this in mind as we go through today
that this is a, you know, at that's
simply the the title he's discussing, but in
a focus point around the technological developments and
the different points you'll see, and you could
probably do 75 different shows with at just
as many other angles
about that network above Epstein and what you
may think it is and the evidence of
that
today are just the points we're gonna get
into relevant to the current events.
But think about the app the network above
Epstein or or above what we deal with
every day.
The network above Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
The network above the, you know, whatever the
the reality in front of us and how
it's being presented to us is her voting
and the law, you know, the just everything,
guys. And it's not to say that everything
is necessarily incorrect, but it's in our interest
today to start reflecting on these things. And
then turn around and reflect on other things
that you maybe thought have you know, you've
never even considered should be reevaluated and say,
is that the best way we could be
doing that? Are we being taken advantage of
by power structures who have gotten used to
us just complying all the time? Yes. The
answer is yes.
So I'm gonna start today with a a
follow-up on the Zorro Ranch point, which has
gotten more and more attention since we've covered
that and since it's been that that's not
we weren't the one that broke that story.
My point is since we were talking about
that, that story has gotten more and more
and more attention, and I'm glad to see
it because
it's a very big story. It's based on,
I would I mean, I would argue subjective
allegations
in the sense that we haven't yet verified
or seen those videos come back up, and
I'll show you what I mean by that.
But I think this is probably one of
the most important parts of this outside of
that signed affidavit,
percentage,
you know, to a court under the threat
of perjury that's that has multiple witnesses and
all signed that Donald Trump and others raped
them. Now they could they could be lying
still. That doesn't prove but it's still far
more valid evidence, and it's also been shown
that they never even followed up on that,
and this one as well. And that's actually
one of the most important parts to me,
is that this, as far as I can
tell, and based on the people involved, including
from New Mexico, including people in the in
in congress or, no,
former. But so people in the political sphere
are literally saying out loud, this is something
we called in. We let them know what
was going on. We got the email. We've
got the info the actual evidence of the
points I'll show you, and no one's ever
investigated. So the point of Kash Patel and
Bondi and everyone else in the Epstein conversation
saying there's nothing actionable.
How could you possibly know that if you've
never investigated this allegation? You know? And, again,
maybe tomorrow, there's some other data point that
makes that all make sense as I've always
said. But as it is now with what
we have in front of us, it appears
as if they never even looked into this
crazy allegation,
and it's wild. Now this is the one
we were talking about. Allegations of bodies buried
at Epstein's New Mexico ranch prompt investigation calls.
So this is the new story. This one
is from February 11. Understand,
this is as always, you know how we
do it on the show. This is the
actual link to the Epstein files. You can
look at it for yourself. Both versions of
it, actually. Just pointing out how funny it
is, macabrely. But here the here they are.
This is the email.
It's all, you know, blanked
out. But here is the same one, same
date with the name shown, you know, or
at least another version of it sent, but
still shows you the guy's name. Now this
is a pretty prominent Republican commentator as I
understand it, and this is sent to him
from somebody, And then that's forwarded
to the and this is this is the
email that was sent to Edward, who is
the host. And it's simply saying, I have
this information. And it's sensitive. And it's about
women who were abused, raped, and killed, and
buried at Zorro Ranch. And then it included,
as I've shown you before, links
to all of these videos that they they
claim. Now, this is all we've ever gotten,
is this this
screenshot version of this without the actual links
included. But so what we're told based on
the person involved, and I'm gonna show you
the I'm gonna play you the video right
now, and this goes back to this story,
is that this is something that was something
at least had something that was there that
they were seeing that was enough to go,
oh my god. We're sending this to the
police or to the FBI. And then nothing
happened. Now I'm gonna quickly see if I
can grab it here. It was
yeah, so this is the person right here,
the radio host Eddie a Aragon
claimed to be somebody was claiming to be
a staffer from Zora Ranch and said that
they demanded 1 Bitcoin,
to to reveal all the information, implicated Jeffrey
and Madame g. I imagine that's meant, just
Lane Maxwell, but that has been confirmed.
Said they were they were emails, including videos
that had,
sexual content with children, minors, and so on.
And, ultimately,
it says, as a as a result, Garcia
Richard sent a letter to the attorney general
and US attorney's office asking them to thoroughly
investigate
this issue.
Now it says fast forward six years, so
now we're talking about 2,000 this is,
as of, you know, currently. The point, though,
is that this is something that was done
before. Attorney general Raul Torres' offices responded to
Garcia with a letter stating, as we understand
it, the allegations appear unsubstantiated.
To my knowledge, no investigation has taken place
thus far.
So what they're doing is they're going off
of the carried down FBI hand off like
Cash Patel telling the next guy, oh, it
was unsubstantiated.
But then you find out they never investigated.
How could we possibly know that? Now the
point, though, is that this person is calling
this out. I'm gonna play the clip for
you right now. New Mexico leaders call for
an investigation into the allegation that two girls
were buried near Epstein's ranch. So it's, again,
a good point to note is that if
you're following independent media, you likely knew about
this before it became the, oh my god.
Now we have to address this because it's
everywhere kind of a mainstream alternative media point.
And this is important and has been going
on for years. And it absolutely implicates everybody
from Trump to Biden and in between
in regard to covering up and not releasing
information, mind you.
Found that there was a very disturbing allegation
that came out
that could be linked potentially to state land.
Because I am the manager of that land,
I'm I'm the elected steward of that land,
what occurs there and what the land is
used for is of utmost interest and importance
to us at the state land office. To
our knowledge, there has not been any investigation
of the state land, or the Zorro Ranch.
Do you have any way of knowing what
this land was used for?
From our reading of the the historic documents,
what it seems like is, like, the state
land was used almost as a buffer, a
shield,
to,
hide what activity was occurring on the ranch.
To insulate the land the ranch. Absolutely. Insulate
visibility to what was occurring there. Are you
concerned
that this public land might actually be a
potential crime scene here? I mean, is that
what we're talking about? Absolutely. If state land
was used for criminal activity, that is definitely
something New Mexicans need to know. That is
something that is those are answers that victims
and survivors
need to have. What does your authority look
like over these lands?
So I have the authority obviously to cancel
the leases and make sure that any
party associated with Jeffrey Epstein was removed from
the property.
Unfortunately, we do not have law enforcement capability
here at the state land office. So we
are looking to partner
with other,
agencies that do have that capacity to be
able to investigate the land. Do you think
there are interested partners out there for you
in law enforcement?
Yeah. So we have already started to receive
some phone calls from folks,
who are willing to partner with us. Is
there capability in New Mexico to get
the technology that helps you look for these
unmarked graves?
Absolutely. Absolutely. There's ground penetrating radar.
You get the gist of where this is
going. Right? I mean, this has become a
very real conversation. Now this this this is
New Mexico's public lands commissioner, Stephanie Garcia, who
I was referencing in regard to the person
continuing to continuing to reach out about this,
who has been following up, apparently, since way
back when when it first came out in
regard to this, what I was reading before.
Now, right now, what's happening is this is
becoming a focal point again, saying, okay. Well,
this is something that can't be denied. Now
the let's get into some of the articles
written about this because it's very interesting to
me that this is being the way it's
being handled is very odd. Now, quickly, to
to readdress the email that we've read on
this, the show more than once. It says
this is sensitive. Again, this is directed to
that conservative radio host.
So it will be the first time and
last email depending on your discretion. You can
choose to take it or trash it, but
this comes from a person that has been
there and seen it all as a former
staff at the Zorro.
The material below was taken from Epstein's home
and my insurance in case of future litigation
against Epstein. Sorry. No questions. What is damning
about Epstein is yet to be written. Did
you know that somewhere in the hills outside
Zorro, two foreign girls were buried on orders
of Epstein and Maxwell? Or rather, Madame G.
Both died by strangulation during rough fetish sex.
And all of these seven videos, as you
can see, sex with minor, threesome, underage girl,
you know, and this I mean, think about
a world in which this wouldn't be investigated.
You know? There's only really one way to
view that in my mind. Now, by the
way, on a quick side note, you know,
it's crazy to think that it's the way
that the world has been built be like,
just
there's so much nonsense and propaganda in this
post truth world they've very clearly created
that it makes you it makes it hard
to know what to I mean, I I've
gotten emails in not, like, to this degree.
But if things like that where people make
allegations that you can't substantiate, you go, man,
I wonder if that was real or not,
but how would I ever find out? Because,
you know, it's it you know, outside of
just talking to them, and and that's where
it ends. And you go, well, there's nothing
more to go on. It's interesting how much
the way
that kind of the media sphere has changed
the way we engage with information, just on
a side note. Now this is important. This
will be included.
Now here is a reporter for the Center
Square, and I'll read you the article they
wrote right here. Here's what she said about
this on top of it. Actually, let's read
the article first, and I'll show you what
she adds to it. So this is the
the,
the, centersquare.com,
New Mexico, Epstein Ranch, now owned by Texas
comptroller candidate, which really speaks. After this quick
part about this
and it really does connect, we're gonna get
into the larger point about the Epstein network
and the overlap to technology, to Israel, to
all of it. But think about just this
just the idea that this is now look.
It could it could it's possible that this
ended up just randomly in somebody else's hands
and has nothing to do with the original
point. But this is mired in in in
very odd things as you'll see from the
reporter in regard to, like,
you know, nondisclosure,
agreements, like, to this day or
any number of weird overlapping points to, like,
the the
keeping certain parts secret. Now why, if you're
just a random person who bought this location,
would you be involved in any of that?
I don't know. I'm not gonna say that
proves anything, but it's interesting.
And now that this is coming out more,
there may be a reason that somebody was
given stewardship
over this potentially damning location. Right? So it
says, Epstein Ranch now owned by Texas comptroller
candidate.
Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch in
Mexico, where multiple alleged child sex crimes were
committed, is now at the center of a
state comptroller race in Texas. Now remember, as
far as I understand, Zorro was never really
raided or investigated in in any real sense,
even though we know this is connected.
Doesn't that seem weird in its own right?
Former Republican state senator business owner and goober
national candidate,
Don Hu, Hufeins,
is running for comptroller to manage the state's
finances. Oh, isn't that perfect? Nah. I shouldn't
say that. I'm not gonna pretend I you
know, this is just an opinion. But if
there was if this is connected, that would
be interesting, the financial connection. The 8,000 acre
property is in Stanley, New Mexico in in
Southern Santa Fe County was sold in 2023
to San Rafael Ranch LLC
for an undisclosed amount.
The own with the owners' names kept confidential.
Now why? Like, if this was just some
random thing, which is what the argument becomes,
that it was just some up up at
auction
and maybe because it's a content a contentious
place, maybe, but that does open up the
question. Right? This would be the way it
went down. Why what underscores money,
the the names kept confidential.
It wasn't until a street name change
and property taxes were contested that public records
request revealed. The owner of San Rafael Ranch
was Huffines.
His wife,
Mary Catherine is listed as a trustee.
His son, Colin Hafines, is listed as an
LLC manager. A records request made public by
the Santa Fe New Mexican shows the estate
was valued at $221,100,000.0
in 2023,
but after he finds protests,
the count, the county tax assessor dropped the
value to 13.4.
Interesting. Why would you want it to be
valued less? Epstein was reported dead in excuse
me. There's more in this you can read,
but continuing on what I highlighted, more than
4,200
records have been released by the Department of
Justice about Zorro Ranch.
One details a Native American woman who was
interviewed by the FBI and claimed her mother
trafficked her and other children to the ranch
and nearby properties. Wouldn't that alone be enough
to have even just a cursory investigation by
the FBI
because of what we know this is connected
to? You know what I mean? Like, it
this it that is subjective,
but it's it doesn't make sense. And an
honest person
would say, I want more answers. I want
more information on that. What do you talk
how you better have something to show us
about why you decided not to look into
such a serious claim at a place that's
already shown to be connected to this.
And it says and this is and and
nearby properties where Epstein held them in property
property bedrooms
and forced them to perform sexual acts to
high prominent clients, according to the the witness.
Multiple documents describe gruesome sexual abuse of children.
Multiple documents. Including allegedly at the mansion that
Hoffines purchased, referred to by victims
as the house on the hill. Isn't that
just disgusting? Who knows if maybe that was
well, I don't know even what the timing
is on that. Was that the name used
for a reason? We shouldn't be dismissing those
kinda weird things today seeing as how wildly
interconnected and kind of all consuming this kinda
stuff seems to be. You know, there's some
reason for this in some kind of larger
mindset. The property is also connected to a
murder for hire scheme and other crimes committed
by a Florida nonprofit later sentenced to more
than thirty four years in prison. So you
literally already have a person who's been put
in prison connected to this location for a
murder for hire scheme.
And they still have yet to look into
these allegations in this location, as far as
I can tell. He was convict convicted, the
murder for hire scheme, of $2,700,000
check kiting and money laundering scheme,
paycheck protection fraud, and filing $300,000,000
worth of fraudulent warranty deeds for properties nationwide,
including Zora Ranch. Prior to the Hufeines purchase,
New Mexico State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia, who
we were referencing a second ago, or Stephanie
Garcia Richard, canceled state cattle grazing licenses with
the Epstein property in 2019.
She also called for a state investigation
into state land being used for criminal acts,
including the burying of abused deceased children.
Neither the state nor
state land nor Zora Ranch had been searched
as part of a criminal investigation, she said.
This is 2019,
guys. That's the one that's what I was
trying to highlight before. I did it quickly,
but we went over this in-depth in a
previous show. This is what we're talking about
is that we're being and and, again, this
is what it's referencing.
Oh, then I closed it already. The email
I just showed you with with all of
those links included.
And she's going, why aren't we investigating this?
And now now she's coming back around in
2026
going, I tried to say it then. Why
is nobody investigating it? That's really pronounced, guys.
That's why this is really difficult to put
away. And I think that's why it's coming
back into the conversation,
which I'm now gonna feel now I feel
like they're gonna have to try to find
a way to put this to bed. Some
kind of phone investigation. So who knows? I
get the sense they're gonna have to respond
to this in some way. But, I mean,
maybe not, seeing as how maybe they're just
that desperate, and they they hope that if
we just don't talk about it, it'll go
away.
It says after the Epstein files were released,
she again is calling for the state and
federal investigators wanting to use radar and cadaver
dogs to search the remains. Somebody's actively trying
to stop this from happening. That has to
be the only way I understand this. Huffines
has characterized his controller campaign as bringing accountability
to managing state resources and championing conservative Christian
values. When asked how purchasing the property used
by convicted sex traffickers
reflected these values, his political consultant, Alan Blakemore,
said in a statement four years after mister
Epstein's death, the Vines family purchased property in
New Mexico listed as a public auction whose
proceeds benefited his victims. Prior to the auction
listing, they had never visited the property. Okay.
Yeah. I mean, I think it's actually important
that we don't just assume this person's somehow
criminally connected as much as, you know, you
know my opinion about pretty much anybody in
government, but that's my opinion.
The point, though, is that it's important that
we make sure we're not just accusing this
person because that's what, you know, the public
court of public opinion is usually
skewed at the very least. But
that doesn't really assuage my concern. I mean,
the reality at the end of the day
is that there was a lot more involved
with this with you know, as actually, to
that point, here's what,
Bethany Blakely said about this
in regard to this exact article. I asked
his attorney several questions. When asked if the
fines were concerned about the sex traffic victims
of the property, if they if and if
they had done any forensic investigations on the
property or donated directly to a victim's fund,
his attorney did not respond.
When I asked about the why the ranch
attendees of his son's engagement party
would reportedly need to sign net nondisclosure
agreements,
he didn't respond.
Huffine's attorney claims the Zura Ranch sale proceeds
went to a victim's fund. But when I
asked about his claim appearing to conflict with
an Epstein estate attorney 2023
claim,
he did not respond.
This I mean,
to me, just a gut,
that
screams that there's something else behind the story.
Now that doesn't have to mean that you
are covering up for the Epstein crimes, but
you know what I mean? Like, you know,
look. Just to hypothetically throw out, which I
enjoy doing just to make a point for
people that have you know? Let's just say
we're let's just grasp and straws. What could
possibly
be a reason and that would just would
would make sense of this, but would not
be him guilty with Epstein crimes. Okay. Hypothetically,
they buy this home. They move in. They're
there for a period of time, and then
all of a sudden, they come across something
that is damaging or is a problem. Now
they, for whatever reason, decide that's not in
their interest to default to to show, but
now they're stuck with a property with all
sorts of buried bodies. That still makes them
somewhat you know, they're hiding it, but it
doesn't mean that they're guilty for the crime.
I'm just simply trying to think, you know,
let's be always be objective. You know? But
I I'll tell you. Right there, national the
the,
nondisclosure agreements, you could argue, might be rich
people.
Put all of it together.
And then with the argument that he gave
this money to victims and it turns out
that the actual Epstein attorney is just I
feel like something's being covered up. That's my
opinion.
But who knows what that is?
So what the real big time media people
out there are doing is blatantly lying to
you. Instead of going after the important information
that ties directly back to Trump and Biden
and all the rest of them, you get
complete clowns like this that come out and
go kaboom.
AG Pam Bondi just unleashed the full Epstein
files under the transparency.
No. She didn't. Didn't happen. February 14. And
you, you gotta love out incorrect information when
as Steve jokingly pointed out. And by the
way, there was another one. It's no longer
there now. I I think I took it
the picture of it up here. That that
one looks like it's now been removed. Oh,
no. There it is. It just says, this
is a lie.
It's just so funny to me. That's wild.
DOJ simply released a statement with list of
names associated. You can go into it all
you want. The point is, there's only in
this course, it all stems back to Gunther
Eagleman or whoever whoever he gleaned it from
and dumped it out without any due diligence.
I just, again, guys, my point, as always,
and I highlighted that so you could see
it, they're just straight lying to everyone. How
does anyone support these clowns? Now, realize, you
the other alternative would be that they didn't
even care. They didn't even look.
It I like what that sounds like. I'm
gonna turn the camera and yell it out
to you guys because
it works for me in the moment. I
mean, go oh, and then, of course, then
he follows up later and goes, oh, oops.
It didn't release them all. My mistake. Yeah,
man. We already knew that. If you check,
the second that was released. The second Gunther
Eganmann's tweet was out. You already you could
prove it was because they don't care. But
I don't need to stress this point for
all of you guys, but just realize either
they are lying to you deliberately or they're
just that bad at their job and it
happens over and over and over and over.
My opinion is there's an effort to keep
you looking somewhere else. Think about how embarrassing
it must be for them to keep doing
this, and yet they keep falling for it.
Or
their job is to do this. And it's
just so easy to see right now that
it's really uncomfortable for them. Speaking of people
like that, Dan Bongino back in the podcast
world trying to convince you the world is
well, he's getting called out everywhere, which I
think is important.
Shadow of Ezra. I'm surprised that account is
doing that. It says, Bongino
justifies the redactions, which shield the clients of
Jeffrey Epstein.
Pacino says he agrees the FBI no longer
has the evidence they once thought they had.
Wow. God. Think about how embarrassing it must
be to be doing this right now for
him. He says there are no tapes of
powerful men raping children, and there's no Jeffrey
Epstein client list. That's how it goes.
Wow. Now as far as I understand it,
and I don't care to check, his numbers
have been just completely tanking. But at the
same time, you wonder, well, is why wouldn't
they just fake those? Maybe he's not in
the circle to make that happen. I don't
know. Or that doesn't happen at all. Who
knows? You can decide for yourself. End of
the day, you should laugh at how stupid
that is. And here's James Lee going, Dan
Pacino is lying. According to the FBI, they
hold approximately 14.6
terabytes of archive data related to Epstein. Now,
let's remember,
that could be a lie. I don't believe
it. I think they're hiding a ton of
information, but just realize that FBI lies to
us like they're breathing like anybody else in
government. So it could be that that was
the lie, just to be objective, but I
think we've already been proven well before this
that these
I mean, even the amount they first claimed.
I doubt that
why would they ever
reveal everything? I mean, the question always, why
would they reveal what they have so far?
I don't know.
To date, the DOJ has only released 300
gigabytes worth of files, roughly 2% of the
total. Isn't going away, Dan?
I agree. Now let's read Kevork's point here.
And with that in
mind, even just those single points we were
highlighting, I mean,
it's very evident that there's some kind of
a deeper connection here. And this is just
from that's from a US perspective. You can
stand back
from the Saudi Arabian connection to I mean,
you think this this this spans the world,
guys.
And that's becoming very difficult for people to
ignore.
So think about this. Now, again, I wanna
make sure and here's his account. Make sure
you guys follow him. He does really good
work.
Very, very,
you know,
objective perspective. He it's the title again was
the Empire Above Epstein.
He says, when I read the latest batch
of Epstein files, I had the strange feeling
that the story was getting bigger in the
serious sense that it starts pushing you toward
questions that are normally considered too heavy for
polite conversation. That's kinda what I'm always talking
about. Right now, that seems to be the
thing, even though that's not what I don't
think the powers want.
Right now, we are having conversations that are
not usually allowed in the, you know, the
or break the over to the window has
been broken, it seems. And it says, who
and the question being what, you know, the
too heavy for polite
conversation is who really rules. Right? Who owns
the money? Who sets the limits of what
is possible?
And why the world often feels like it's
being managed from above while the rest of
us are simply reacting from below?
He says, I I and I want I
want to start this op ed with a
disclaimer because in today's environment, people either want
you to speak with religious certainty
or they want you to shut up. And,
again, we all deal with this in independent
media. I don't believe that's the majority, but
it's presented as such, and it's very frustrating.
Right? And they that's the whole quote I
always point out. Right? The whole problem with
the world, fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves while wiser men so full
of doubts. And I believe that's Arnab Bittrain,
at least referenced to him. And it's so
obvious. And it's just that they're out there
like the Guntherman Alex point we just made,
screaming at the top of their lungs the
absolute point, and they're wrong two seconds later.
People like Kvork didn't report it at all
because we're still waiting to find out for
the facts. But guess what? They got tons
and tons of views and money and read
that that's how that works. And or they
or they just convince enough people to look
the wrong way just wouldn't matter.
He says,
I reject both of those demands. Right? Being
objective is the path. I'm going to be
careful with my words. I'm going to raise
con controversial ideas, and I'm going to tell
you openly that some of what I'm about
to say is speculation.
Not because I wanna hide behind a hedge,
but because anyone who speaks about these networks
honestly
has to admit
where the evidence ends and where interpretation begins.
For years, you've heard, quote, conspiracy theorists say,
quote, we're ruled by satanic cults. And I've
always been skeptical of that framing, not because
I think the world is morally pure, but
because I don't accept extreme claims, not evidence,
which is why I love this guy. However,
he says, what I have always said long
before the document these documents is that the
people who dictate foreign policy, who start wars,
who impose starvation sanctions, who can look at
the suffering of millions and call it strategy,
must have a certain psychological
profile.
Because normal human beings do not casually destroy
entire societies and then sleep well at night.
And if you think that's an exaggeration, just
look at how sanctions operate as a weapon.
In The United States, most people have food
on the table. And, yes, there is poverty
and injustice in America, but there are families
outside America who cannot afford bread for their
children or milk for a newborn baby. The
western public is trained to believe this is
always the result of local corruption or mismanagement.
But we both know, if you've been following
his work, he writes, on Syria,
The U that that US led unilateral coercive
measures, illegal economic sanctions
are employed as a tool of war
designed to break societies until they submit. He
and I agree entirely on that. Now quite
frankly, to be honest or to be, you
know, accurate, it is a provable fact.
You can point to their own documentation
back to Kissinger, and before talking about how
this is how they apply. Just realize that.
It's like most of the things we talk
about. You can quite literally prove right now
that ISIS and Al Qaeda were machinations and
creations of the people we're pointing to today,
but then that becomes conspiracy theory even though
you can effing prove it. But I digress.
The point is, in this case,
these sanctions are designed to collapse societies for
the interest of the powerful, not to, you
know, coerce action for the good of the
people. Like, it's just it's insane how obvious
that is. So what he's saying is simply,
we both know that if you've been following
his work,
that the reality of of our society has
already become quite, you know, obvious to most
people that we are being, you know, manipulated
on a grand scale. And instead of fighting
for freedom,
they're fighting for control at the expense of
the very people they say and they're trying
to save. We're very much in the same
mind on this. Now he says Syria is
the clearest example because the record is not
even disputed. After Donald Trump's sanctions,
especially the Caesar Act, Syrians were pushed under
the poverty line at on a mass scale.
And we are talking about millions of people
living inside the country who watched their currency
collapse, like Iran right now. And before that
with Iran. You know, it's been more than
once. Their purchasing power evaporates and their society
suffocate economically
even after the major battles quieted down. That's
important because the Caesar Act was the were
the largest reason why they were being basically
handicapped in rebuilding. The US government would not
allow rebuilding for the people of Syria until
they got what they wanted, but they claimed
the entire time we're fighting for the people
of Syria. Like, that's deliberate.
Not just
sanctions to make them starve, but to hold
them in the midst of that suffering. Think
about how devious that is.
And it says, now, here is where the
Epstein emails began to change the way you
perceive the world.
Because for years, we assumed that the people
making these decisions were the invisible institutions.
White House, Congress, the Senate, Department of Defense,
Department of Justice, the intelligence agencies. We assumed
those were the rooms where policy is made.
And maybe they are, partly.
But what these leaks invite you to consider
is that even those institutions
may not be at the top of the
pyramid. That beyond presidents, beyond politicians, beyond the
faces you see on television, there might be
stronger forces that finance, incentivize,
and guide the decisions.
And that the visible leaders are sometimes executors
rather than planners.
Because once you start reading about the relationships
around Epstein, who we met, who we advised,
who we had access to, who was bragging
about representing, who he was bragging about representing.
Rothschilds is who he's talking about. You begin
to see something like a web,
a connected network of money, ideology,
bureaucracy,
where the same names
show up across finance, tech, academia,
and politics.
And you begin to suspect that what we
call democracy might be more like a stage.
A circus of competing politicians who look like
leaders,
but function in reality as employees of a
system they do not control.
I say this not to sound melodramatic,
but because the implication is deeply unsettling.
If power is operating through networks we cannot
see directly,
then what is the meaning of elections?
Parliaments,
campaign promises,
televised debates, moral posturing.
Are we truly choosing our future, or are
we being offered a menu
where the real chef remains hidden and our
only role is to select the dish will
be served?
He says, this season, how about
every
day? Right?
What what what chosen outrage story for the
day? Left or right, mind you? I support
the current thing. That's a daily dynamic. But
in general, we have the you know, it's
we're now in the election season. We're now
in the
exactly the reality. He says, this is where
the names that appear around Epstein start becoming
more than gossip.
The point is not to worship or demonize
a single family or a single dynasty. And
I wanna be clear here because the Internet
loves
turning analysis into tribal targeting. He great point.
Just the simple idea that trying to be
objective or trying to make a fine like,
a focal point within it make they argue
you're oh, you're fighting for the Democrats or
you're hiding for the it's you know, as
always. And even if it's the truth, it's
used to ignore the point rather than to,
you know, flesh it out.
The point is not to worship or demonize
a single family or dynasty. I wanna be
clear here because the Internet loves turning analysis
into tribal targeting. The point is to understand
that banking dynasties, military industrial interests, and elitist
elitist tech projects are not separate universes. They
are often intertwined. And when you see Epstein
telling people that he represents major banking interest
and when you see the proximity
between Silicon Valley billionaires and networks like his,
you start thinking that many of the so
called visionary
projects sold to the public,
transhumanism,
brain chips,
AI governance,
digital currency systems.
Might not be grassroots innovations after all, but
top down projects in search of total control
over the human environment.
Think remember that point.
And when you think about it this way,
you begin to question the entire hierarchy of
power, which we need to be doing. Maybe
parliaments are not the first level of decision
making, but the fourth or even the fifth.
Maybe prime ministers and presidents are not sovereign
leaders, but third level managers tasked with selling
policy to the public.
Maybe the Musk and teal class,
those who run platforms, build AI systems, push
neural technologies
are not the top either.
But executive directors implementing projects designed elsewhere
for interest larger than their own.
Then you arrive at the most dangerous question
of all, the question nobody wants citizens to
ask out too loudly.
If the real power lies above the democratic
stage in darkness,
in networks that can feed money, push ideas,
and mobilize bureaucracy to implement them,
then do we then do we really live
in democracies?
Or do we live inside managed democracies where
freedom is mostly a feeling
and choice is mostly a performance?
This is where the modern agenda begins to
look like a trap.
Digital IDs,
central bank digital currencies, a future of permanent
verification.
Remember that too. A future where every transaction,
moment, and social interaction can be registered, controlled,
possibly punished. Guys, I think we're there right
now.
Even public health itself, some taught something that
should belong to medicine and care becomes a
dominion of discipline and enforcement,
enforcement, where you're told that you must comply
not because the science is settled, but because
the system has decided that dissident is intolerable.
And people will ask,
do we have a choice?
Are we truly able to say no
if these systems are being built regardless of
what voters think?
You know what I think on that, guys.
Because if these projects can be imposed even
against public skepticism,
like right now, then democracy becomes a branding
exercise
rather than a governing reality. And that point,
you can apply to damn near everything we're
dealing with.
What has changed, he writes, for me since
this recent Epstein drop is not that I
suddenly discovered evil exists or that powerful people
lie.
What changed is that the veil
feels thinner. That's what I'm talking about.
And the hierarchy feels clearer.
And the idea that politicians are leaders feels
harder to swallow. And it could be that
that's by design to shove us into the
next thing. But either way, guys, we need
to take advantage of the clarity. We see
it right now. That's what I agree with
him. He goes on to say, when someone
like Tony Blair, who played an instrumental role
invading Iraq,
universally hated as far as I can tell.
When he comes back years later, which he
just did, and tries to sell the public
the need for digital IDs,
he writes, I see him as an employee,
a middle manager, implementing the projects of superiors
whose names are rarely seen on the screen,
which by the way, I agree with that,
which means it would apply like even the
Peter Thiel's of the world. Neil Musk, as
he writes, are just a a level above
that, but definitely not I don't think the
people who are actually
truly, if that's the way it works, guiding
the actions are even in our brain.
You know, this is a point they make
about, like, a Bilderberg meeting or what really
where the real conversations are being had today
since we see that.
Anyway, it says, and perhaps this is the
real geopolitical significance of the Epstein emails. Beyond
the depravity, beyond the scandal, beyond the sensationalism,
they force you to confront the possibility
that the world is governed by networks.
And that these networks are more durable than
governments, more influential than elections, and more insulated
than any official institution will ever admit.
And this is the whole point about, like,
internal enforcement. They hate each other half the
time, but they're all willing to stand together
to keep you from seeing the way the
world works, in my opinion.
He goes on to say, I'm not asking
you to accept a single grand theory. I'm
asking you to notice the pattern.
Exactly. And to ask yourself whether the pattern
explains why the world feels increasingly unfree,
increasingly managed, increasingly
engineered, even as we are told with straight
faces that we live in the most democratic
era of human history.
If this is where we are headed, toward
a future of digital control layered on top
of economic exhaustion and manufactured crises,
then the only serious question left is not
who will win the next election,
but whether ordinary people can recover enough clarity,
unity, and courage to reclaim a political life
that is not scripted from above.
Because if we are reduced to permanent at
reaction,
always reacting to the next war, the next
crisis, the next manufactured panic,
then we will remain subjects.
And maybe that is the most mind boggling
part of all, that the Epstein story, which
began as a sort of scandal, ends by
forcing us to ask whether the civilization
we live in is still what it claims
to be.
So well done.
Here's his link to his support if you
wanna support him financially.
Kumar Kalmasian as is a Syrian
geopolitical analyst and the founder of Sirion Analysis.
I've interviewed him, I think, more than once.
Good guy.
Well done. Now I I mean, I actually
just reached out to him. He might have
responded already. I've I've asked I'd I'd love
to post this on TLaf. I you I
mean, typically, these things are you know, anyway,
I'd like I wanna make sure he's okay
with that first. Either way, just
outstanding. Right? And I think it's sadly,
that something like this,
for people that just don't want to hear
it, it's just it's just written word. You
know? So it's something that you you put
a tent on it. Yo, he fights for
this side or he's got this political view.
I mean, what he just wrote there is
so shocked, so perfectly apolitical. It's just exactly
bay I mean, it is not not about
left or right. It's just about the idea
that power
manipulates.
Right.
Let's get into this even more.
Oh, I'll include, by the way, let me
make sure I save that.
I I I included his, video as well.
Now I don't know if he just reads
it off or not. It's fourteen minutes, so
I doubt it. But it's the same discussion.
The Empire Above Jeffrey Epstein,
and so you can watch that too and
support his support his platform. Now
on that note, I said, remember that point.
Right?
This is just a rant I just saw
this right before I was going live, and
I said, jeez. It just adds to the
bigger picture. Jeffrey Epstein inquired about toxic plant
that produces drug that blocks free will.
Now look, that whether it's just scientific inquiry
or whatever,
when you look at the big picture, this
is what they were working on. Like, him
or any other kind of power in control,
suppressing independent thought and free will. I mean,
you could talk about fluoride, and these things
aren't jokes. Look it up if you care
about the science. There is a reality, at
least when they first research this in that
vein about how it might, you know, quiet
down free thought. This is where we are.
And so I want you to think about
this being the mindset of the people that
are around them and think about the network
that he was just discussing.
That this is an influence control network and
this person, I in no way was at
the top, but was a part of it
that's now seen. And that's making this difficult
to put away. And this is the kind
of stuff they were working on. Okay? So
let's start with a quick point about the
an email that was involved that connects back
to Peter Thiel and Palantir as we were
highlighting recently, and then falls follow this trail
in in how this seems to connect. Now
this, not familiar. I've followed him because of
this. Papa Power mapping highlighted this, which is
the the email, which, of course, we grabbed
for you. It's right here. We'll go through
it.
He highlights this first,
post back from 2024
where he says beyond IDF general Ehud Barak,
that's the same the prime minister as well,
Epstein has ties to military,
Israeli military, which you now which you know
and have for a long time, more so
now, and intel figures like Ilitchai.
Leshin, black cube, and we'll talk about her
next in a second, Pinchas, Tim as well,
Perkhas, unit a two hundred.
So this is just he's highlighting this conversation
showing how clear it is then. So he
comes back around to this twenty twenty six
and says, oh my gosh. Look at this.
Now, this is one, I think we might
have pointed this already, but I wanna use
this to build this point. Either way, there's
a bunch of this coming out, and it's
an email
to Jeffrey Epstein,
cc e Barack
from we don't get to know, apparently. Oh,
funny enough, it does say this was so
funny to me. I guess just the email
they're blocking. Trey Stevens right here from Trey
Stevens. And let's go to the bottom real
quick.
And it's simply saying and this is about
Carbine, which was originally Carbine nine 11, which
was a originally, an emergency,
call center kind of AI dynamic.
Well, recently, it was meshed together with a
massive surveillance database,
which shouldn't be surprising. But it's important to
bring this together because we've been talking about
Carbine and Israel and the intelligence connection for
a long time.
So,
as it says,
dear Amir, I hope all is well and
you got back to Israel safely last week.
As we discussed, Nicole
and, which is,
Junkins, I believe, or Junker. We'll get to
right here in a second. Junkerman. Excuse me.
Nicole Junkerman. And I thought that Trey Stevens,
at at Founders Fund, which is Peter Thiel,
would be a good person for you to
discuss carbine progress to date with and the
challenges that you are that you face in
building a business that is primarily focused on
governments and the wider public
sector. And it says, given the Trey's background
at Palantir, we figured there'd be a fair
amount of, serendipity.
Okay. So they're just connecting these people about
this invasive Israeli program to monitor everything happening
in The United States under the guise of
nine one one call centers. And, hey, let's
get to Peter Thiel and Palantir. Like, I
think they can help you get the foot
in the door, and they sure did. Now
it says, dear Trey, nice to meet you.
So this is them connecting. Right? You can
see founder and CEO of Carbine.
Up here is the last one. Yeah. So
it says, dear both, and this again is
is, from him to Jeffrey Epstein and Brock.
We made the connection to Founders Forum or
Forum, excuse me, and Peter Thiel. If you
wanna put a word with Peter, if if
you want to put in a word with
Peter, baby. So clearly, the point is to
connect these
the the the point in the couple things
we're gonna highlight is not just that this
is some like, the simple point of the
connection of the network point of Epstein
that connects to Peter Thiel, to Palantir,
to Carbine nine one one, and now Carbine,
and then back around the ice and Palantir
and and this surveillance connection. Just to make
sure we see that network. And it's really
just a highlight that you have an Epstein
and whatever he truly represents in your mind
connected
immersed and connected deep to exactly what's building
out in this country right now. And this
is just one example of this and a
larger point we've made many times over the
shows.
But so here is a connection to the
back to again to this article Whitney wrote
for Last American Vagabond in 2023, The Prince
and the Spy,
and there's Latel Leshem. Now this remember that
the report was about this Conframe company, at
least one example, and the idea that an
Israeli company is using somebody like Erik Prince
to basically pretend that they're a US company.
And that's all it really requires. And this
is ultimately represents an Israeli program to create
companies that are part of their intelligence
and then use them to influence things on
the ground or the guys that they're not
an intelligence connected company. Funny enough, I haven't
actually played that clip in a minute. That's
what's something I was playing constantly, so I
think still think it's incredibly important.
Here is that clip on that exact point
from sixty minutes.
Right? We've talked about this more than once.
Oh, wait. Am I gonna find that again?
Hold on. It was,
there it is.
Called pager.
Here we go.
And you guys, I'm sure, have seen this
if you watch the show. But, the point
is not just that,
how do we get that back? There we
go. Not just that it was
connected to the pager attack. Right? That point.
But with what we're discussing today and the
reality of how they do this. And I
could read that article as well again, citing
from Israeli intelligence, but just that they've say
this was set up by Mossad.
Farm
Israel set this up with sixty minutes, and
they openly endorsed this interview. How did you
convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
shell companies over shell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
This
it really is insane to me that they
can come out so even if they're lying,
if you think they're lying, they come out
and so blatantly say this. We are manipulating
supply chains with fake companies that are operating
for Israeli intelligence. And then I can come
out and go, that's a thing, and they're
like, oh, you're racist, Or dismissed by the
mainstream, anyway. It shows you a willful discussion,
guys, or real or effort, rather,
where it can be openly discussed, and yet
the mainstream, mainstream alternative still pretend like it's
all fake. We were talking about this this
morning about, like, geoengineering or these weird moments
where we know as a matter of fact,
it's happening, and yet you still it's not
that it's like we don't see the information.
It's just it continues to be regarded as
not real because
the truth is not guiding that conversation. It's
the same point right here.
So as we're talking about that, that general
point of the video,
let's say Leshum, who is Israeli intelligence, is
part of the company that used Eric Prince
here, just to highlight that as in this
conversation. But Carbine was originally founded as a
reportee in 2014 by Leshem from Israeli intelligence.
Leshem and Ilichai, who we just mentioned as
well back in 2024 on the post I
showed you, are unit eighty two hundred veterans.
Before it was revealed that Jeffrey Epstein also
remember that Whitney wrote this in 2023.
Something right now, this bombshell,
literally written right here is exactly the reality
because we already proved it back then. It
says, Epstein,
before it was revealed that Jeffrey Epstein had
poured at least $1,000,000
into the company at the behest of his
close associate, Ehud Barak, Israel's prime minister at
the time. Carbine's board of directors,
which Barak chaired, included the former commander of
a unit eighty two hundred or of unit
eighty two hundred, Pinchas, Pinchas Birches,
as well as Epstein associate turned venture capitalist,
Nicole Jerkerman.
So this is carbine nine one one at
the time, which was a 911 call center
surveillance platform that basically scooped up everything from
your phone should you call 911. And Israel
had connection to that through intelligence.
Very public. It's all there, and so did
Jeffrey Epstein.
So on this side of it, you got
the Epstein connection. Over here, you got the
Epstein connection to our 911 call centers. Like
and then through that, the network we're discussing.
But as it continues,
Axon. Now this is how you bring this
forward to today, just on this one point.
You've got this is twenty twenty five, November.
Axon acquires
Carbine
for $625,000,000
consolidating Israeli nine eleven surveillance tech with US
police body camera giant. So, maybe you were
going, Well, Ryan, it was just nine eleven
call centers before. What are they really gonna
take? Okay. Well, guess what? That was the
infrastructure. That was beginning that step. Now, they've
mashed it together with body cams, with surveillance,
with Palantir. So you've got this ubiquitous, which
you all probably know already through this show
and others, but this is a ubiquitous, Israeli
run surveillance network over The United States. It's
not even secret.
The dominant US provider of police body cameras
and tasers,
serving over 18,000
law enforcement agencies, entered a definitive agreement to
acquire
Carbine for $625,000,000
in an all cash transaction,
of course, expected to close in quarter one
twenty twenty six.
The acquisition consolidates Carbine's Israeli
Unit eight thousand two hundred developed nine eleven
surveillance technology.
Surveillance? Wait a minute. I thought it was
about call center 911 connections. Oops. Serving hundreds
of agencies protecting over 250,000,000
people worldwide with comprehensive GPS location tracking.
Video, live video streaming, and AI powered data
extraction from smartphone emergency calls. Because that's what
we want, right, guys?
Scooping up our information that has nothing to
do with what we're calling about? With Axon's
extensive law enforcement technology
ecosystem, including body cameras, digital evidence management, and
AI analytics platforms.
Funny how that started one way and turned
out as something else. Funny how that often
happens. By combining Carbine's cloud native 911 call
routing and data collection capabilities
with Axon's prepared by Axon AI driven situational
awareness platform, acquired separately,
the transaction creates an integrated surveillance
infrastructure
linking the initial 911 emergency call through field
response and evidence collection to prosecution.
A
single unified platform
connecting, quote, every moment from call to response
under one corporate entity with comprehensive data access
across the entire public safety workflow. In case
you missed that, though.
911
call through field response and evidence collection
to prosecution.
Gotta love that part. Right? So now it's
turned into a we're here just to collect
to relay your call information to now apparently
carbine nine one one involved with Israel to
put people in prison.
If that's I mean, I this is very
preliminary, mind you. It's still this is happening,
but this is
q q one twenty twenty six, like, right
now, essentially, is when this is gonna be
starting.
Carbine's technology developed by veterans of Israel's signals
intelligence unit and funded by, look at what
it says right here, Il Garak, Jeffrey Epstein,
and Peter Thiel's founder fund before attracting AT
and T venture investment
will now flow seamlessly
into Axon's ecosystems,
serving the vast majority
of US law enforcement agencies.
You see, if this was an honest conversation,
that would be insane
to be like, wait. Wait. Wait. You're telling
me that the former prime is Prime Minister
of Israel who was very close with Jeffrey
Epstein, who, by the way, is a government
that, well before October 7, has been committing
massive war crimes openly,
worked with Jeffrey Epstein to fund this, with
Peter Thiel's founder fund, to create this thing
that is now ubiquitously
surveilling Americans against the Constitution. Okay. Good times.
Well, realize the Epstein is the real point
of today. The the the connection that Kevork
is talking about.
From technology,
Silicon Valley, to police aid. You you now
have a connection from Israel's government through Jeffrey
Epstein to every single police office camera on
on the ground.
I mean, that's just absolutely ridiculous, guys.
But
that's I'm I'm crazy conspiracy theorists citing directly
from what they're telling you.
Public safety giant Axon acquires Carbine for $625,000,000
in cash. Just to, you know, go off
the,
calculus
app article.
That one was posted, on the eleventh as
well.
So as we talked about Palantir and the
connection around that, obviously, Peter Thiel, Palantir, and
the the ubiquitous surveillance that's happening from a
different angle. Right? The idea of immigration, which
really you could understand that it's all mashed
together, but it's about narrative control. Right? Over
here, they were doing, oh, we're scanning, you
know, individual viruses for immigration. Over here, we've
got Israel's I mean, it's all the same
system.
But either way, what we're talking about is
some justification for one more step. Palantir
is a very problematic entity that represents something
much larger than just a company, guys.
I'll include both of these. This is our
IMA panel on it, the Palantir Panopticon.
Here's a good clip from Al Jazeera.
Palantir founder Peter Thiel's named over 2,200
times in the Epstein files.
You'd think that would matter. Palantir is the
AI firm used by Israel and ICE for
surveillance.
Its founder, Peter Thiel, appears over 2,200
times in his Epstein files.
Here's what we found.
Through their often cryptic communications,
Thiel and Jeffrey Epstein revealed that they viewed
crises as opportunities,
flippantly referring to wars abroad. In June 2014,
Thiel said that creating a mess in the
rest of the world could limit US intervention.
Epstein also talked to Thiel about foreign currencies
evaluation with enthusiasm.
It's worth noting, by the way, that you
also have the casual
sort of similar suggestion from Bannon and Jeffrey
Epstein.
Right?
Do a foreign intervention. That'll bring people together.
See how cavalierly they discuss
destabilizing countries which lead to millions, you know,
lot a lot of people dying,
but just for some small benefit?
That's the network we're discussing. That's who we're
dealing with, psychopaths.
Teal was invited to Epstein's island, and they
expressed loyalty to one another. Like in this
2015 email, where Teal reassured the convicted sex
offender that he was not at all intimidated
by bad press.
Epstein frequently connected people to Thiel, notably
Israeli politician Ehud Barak. In recently leaked audio
from 2013,
Epstein encouraged Barak, at the time Israel's defense
minister, to look into Palantir.
Today, Israel is one of Palantir's most lucrative
clients.
Palantir provides
predictive policing technology and artificial intelligence for automated
decision making, according to a 2025 UN report.
When asked in 2024
what he thought of the Israeli army using
AI to bomb Gaza, here's what Thiel said.
Broadly, the IDF gets to decide, what it
wants to do and that they're broadly in
the right. Palantir's biggest profits are from the
US Department of Defense, which has committed to
spending $2,000,000,000.
The Department of Homeland Security
has allocated over $300,000,000
to Palantir.
By January
2026,
ICE had adopted Palantir's tracking tool called Elite,
which extracts addresses from health care data to
locate immigrants,
as reported by four zero four media, based
on internal ICE documents.
Despite the evidence, Palantir claims on its website
that it is not a surveillance company.
We're obliged to point out that being mentioned
in the Epstein files is not evidence of
wrongdoing.
But from what has been made public, it's
clear the convicted sex trafficker had a close
relationship with Thiel and took an interest in
his business,
a business
that's still thriving with its contracts with the
world's richest and most powerful entities, which critics
say pose real dangers to vulnerable people.
Think about this for a second. Right? You
know, the the connections.
Now, you know my opinion. I think this
is a government problem, left or right.
You know, there's probably different variants, you know,
amounts on one side of the I it's
an all of government issue. But if you
stand back right now and look, it's so
ridiculous how every single person close to Trump
is now being shown to be not just
like, oh, I was in the files, but,
like, we were close, we were friends, we
worked with them, we had deals together. Now
I'm willing to bet you the same thing
could probably be found out about most people
in high positions of power, but do you
see that same thing represented on Epstein or
rather, on Biden's administration? Do not take that
as a point of one versus the other.
I don't see it that way. But I
just, nonetheless, find it insane that we can
stand here right now and look, and they
can still be acting like it's only the
Democrats.
It takes a special kind of stupid willful
ignorance. Like, look at what's going on. It's
clearly either all of it or nothing, guys.
They're all involved in this, and it's just
hilarious to me. But the effort to say
Lutnick and I mean, even the people that
would be considered like a Democrat side who
are right now very close to Trump, Bill
Gates.
I mean, the Silicon Valley, but, obviously, Peter
Thiel and pretty much everybody in that circle.
It's just pretty crazy. But the truth is
that this speaks to something much larger, much
bigger connection, a network as Kevork is saying.
Now think of it like this, right? Let's
say
let's say that this is the network Kevork
is discussing, right? And it's a it's a
universal thing. It's just the way all of
it works, and we've always been lied about
that. And, like, let's even take it to
an extreme degree, which I I don't believe.
I think it's always some level of nuance.
But say that it's just
everything. That that's every single powerful leader knows
this, and that's how it works. Okay? Just
to make the point clear. So hypothetically, if
that's the case, and then this happens. Right?
Whether it's because, you know, whether it's the
information's always been there and for whatever reason,
they just can't hide it anymore. Whatever it
is, this have they this now comes out.
So if Epstein represents
the quittin' or the crack between the door
where you can see the way it really
works,
the re at the end of the day,
there's never anything they can do about that
because every angle, every direction they go in
simply adds more awareness
to the way that things actually work. So
it would just explain why it's going the
way that it is because they can't what
are we gonna do? Can't arrest somebody because
that's only gonna open it more. You know?
It sort of speaks to the possibility of
that real functioning dynamic where it's based on
coercion and blackmail and whatever else. And I
just think that's interesting to think about because
otherwise, there would be some level of accountability
in some way. Like, I'm surprised we haven't
seen even, like, a tiny like, why wouldn't
they just, like, frame somebody?
And I'm not saying that I hope that
happens, but you'd expect some kind of action
at this point. I just don't know. I
think, again, that's always the point is we
don't really know, but it does that black
hole analogy, it speaks to something. There's something
happening right there that this is,
you know, that this is all revealing to
us.
So kim.com had an interesting point in this.
He said that Palantir was hacked. Now, like,
that's basically
him citing this.
He says Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI
agent was used to to gain super user
access, and here's what the hackers allegedly found.
Now, just on a first point, do you
know how often this seems to happen?
You know, NSO Group or something like that,
or one of these groups that are some
kind of, you know, hired in many ways
to, like, protect you. Israel has tons of
those from the hackers. And then weirdly enough,
that's the company that was hacked three year
you know, three weeks later.
Or, you know, usually longer than that. But
the point, nonetheless, is like, well, you just
hired the group that's supposed to stop that
from happening, and then weirdly enough, you're the
one that gets hacked. And, of course, the
argument becomes that it was about focusing on
Israel or whatever. But if you look at
the consistency of that, you'll find frequently that
these things are connected to groups that are,
you know, the Israel overlap to those kind
of conversations. So in this case, with Palantir
and what we're showing you, it makes you
wonder, was it really hacked or was this
just simply the use of this? But it
says, Peter Thiel and Alice Karp, commit mass
surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry
on massive scale. They have thousands of hours
of transcribed and searchable conversations of Trump and
Elon Musk and Vance. Now, yes.
But don't take that point as we're focusing
on Trump and Elon Musk, and that may
be how he wants to say it. If
we understand what the surveillance is and how
the ubiquitous nature, they have that on everybody,
which think of the power that comes along
with that, which I think is his point.
It's to say that think about what that
means. They they have all of these things
on these people who are currently in power.
Well, there's your FC network right
there. They could use that to influence that
policy, and that to me would represent very
clearly Israel interests. They have backdoored the devices,
cars, and jets of world leaders and accumulated
the biggest archive of blackmail material. He's talking
about Palantir, guys. But
for sake of conversation,
at the very least, you have to see
that that's an extension or rather just through
all of that, that includes Israel, or you
could argue it is.
But my point is to just say even
if it's a part of it, you have
to recognize,
where was that?
Oh, dang it. It was,
there it is. Just to just to give
you a point to go off of and
you can research this more. It's bicycle. That's
not a bicycle.
I hate these CAPTCHA checks.
Oops. They never work properly.
Is the restricted strategic partnership
in the middle of the peak of their
genocide with Palantir.
So they could use it to murder people.
Habsora,
Lavender. This is not a joke. So, I
mean, you have to see how immerse those
and then you can go back even further
to things like the connection to Epstein and
Palantir and why they're as prominent as they
are today.
It's worth asking, and one and and, hopefully,
you can recognize that there's something more than
just being a profitable company here. But so
his point is think about what they're doing
and how much influence they have and blackmail.
So there you go. Maybe that is the
extension of this. Palantir is creating nuclear bioweapons
capabilities for Ukraine and is working closely with
the CIA to defeat Russia. I mean, who
knows, guys? I don't know why we take
Kim's word on all this.
Part of it I mean, he is partisan.
No matter how many times he says things,
you know, it's clear to me. But he
says they believe they are one year away.
They plan to achieve this by you know,
it's just all his opinion. Now that's my
opinion about his stance, by the way. Maybe
he doesn't see himself as that, but I've
seen him take stances that very clearly, in
my opinion, help build the two party illusion.
Palantir's responsible for the majority of deaths in
Gaza. I agree with that. Palantir's an arm
of the CIA. I mean, yes. It's I
think it's more nuanced than that, but I
would agree. Palantir's become more dangerous comp the
most dangerous company in the world. Palantir
data the hackers who allegedly gathered will be
given to Russia or China. So that's my
point. I don't know why that would make
sense.
I don't see it as that. I think
they're already working with these groups in many
ways, but this is a different conversation. So
to this point,
did I get that for you? Yeah. Okay.
This is what RT had to write about
this. AI overmurds of the world hacked. Follow-up
from the massive Palantir breach.
Now it says and there's there's more you
could get into this, but, again, it's simply
it's coming simply from, game.com. That's where this
comes from. So, you know, question it like
you would have been just anybody, one source,
saying something without anything to go on. And
it simply points out something I thought was
interesting. Essentially, it creates what you know, Palantir.
What they're saying is, here's Palantir. If you
ever heard of it. It comes from Lord
of the Rings, like the name they're using.
And it says it says, where was that?
Upload all of their data, and Palantir
then utilizes
AI to transform this chaotic information into a
coherent picture.
That's what this is, specifically
Gotham. So remember he mentioned,
Elite, I think, but they have Gotham, they
have Elite. They have, like, three or four
different programs they're using, and that's not even
including the Israel side of this. I mean,
it is in the sense that they're through
that, but there's an entirely different argument coming
from the unit a 200 company built discussion.
For all we know, they're all interconnected. But
it goes on to say, essentially, it creates
a digital twin
of reality. How interesting is that? Revealing connections
that an analyst could have never recognized on
their own. For example, that a terrorist had
called the cousin of someone who recently transferred
money to a suspicious account or so they
patched together with their arguments. Palantir serves as
a massive surveillance mechanism for monitoring Americans' adversaries.
Clearly, not just adversaries. Frankly, I think it's
more so about you, more than anything else
in the world. It is an operating system
for war intelligence,
providing agencies with a supercomputer that can see
everything, his quote. But it's the agencies themselves
that feed this computer with data.
Now, digital twin point, just since it got
mentioned, I think is very interesting. We've talked
about that a lot. Right? Think about all
the data they're scooping up and the importance
of what this brings to the table that
nobody's getting into. Here's just one of the
articles I've referenced in the past. Meet your
digital twin. The AI model can predict your
health future or your future is the point,
guys. It's just a health focused perspective. It's
really about being able to predict to a
very high degree what you'll do.
You know, next Tuesday at 03:45PM.
That's what we're talking about based on your
data. That's not a joke, by the way.
They can use these predictive models. Think about
like a SimCity dynamic. We've talked about this
a lot with an example of you living
your life through this through this
database
as just like an AI or other, you
know, a a, you know, like a SimCity
entity that is inputting your data, everything you
say, what you do, what you posted that
day, where you went for lunch. That it's
all getting inputted into this in real time
and then it changes to a small degree
what that thing will do forever. It acts
out your life. It gives them insight into,
you know,
everyone's potential actions. And the further it gets
fleshed out, the more accurate it becomes. Think
of the power behind that. Now, just to
be clear, that's not my opinion. That's what
is happening. It's been discussed more times than
I can count. Here,
this is something I found interesting. It was
called the Phenotype Project, the Human Phenotype Project.
Now, this is one of many. I thought
it was interesting because it started
pretty much the same time that this version
started in The United States, and it also
started in Israel. Maybe that's just coincidence. I
don't know. But the timing of all this
and when Palantir rolled out its massive thing,
I just find that an interesting overlap. You
can decide for yourself. Now, here's another connection.
This is in regard to the Apple Israel
overlap, and this is the same kind of
conversation of
technology,
pre crime
surveillance.
February 15, gray zone. Apple buys Israeli pre
speech tech firm implicated in Gaza genocide.
Amazing how many of these connections we can
continue to see, and it just never seems
to break for certain people.
Tech giant Apple has quietly paid nearly $2,000,000,000,
$2,000,000,000
for a, quote, prespeech
tech company
whose employees helped Israel commit genocide in Gaza.
In the second biggest deal in its history,
Apple paid this money
for a company that doesn't even have a
product,
doesn't have any revenues, and whose website is
a single page
containing 15 words.
This is all it
is. Magic realized. Click down,
and it shows you this. In a world
full of noise, we craft a new kind
of quiet. That's it.
That's it.
Think about this. So what is it they're
actually buying?
Israel, guys. That's what this is. That's not
even my opinion. This is an Israeli company
tied right back to their intelligence community, and
they're buying Israel.
In the sense of just whatever they have
to bring. So why would that make sense
to a company? Don't they have a fudu
a fudiciary
responsibility
to their,
you know, board?
I mean, the point being is that you
could argue that this might make it probably
will just because the system will make that
the case. But how would you rationalize
$2,000,000,000
for something that doesn't exist, essentially, other than
it will become some kind of surveillance entity?
It's either because that's what it's all about,
surveillance, or because it's something that shows you
the bigger network that is continually building out
this around you, the control grid.
It says,
the company is QAI.
And it is and we've actually briefly pointed
to this a while ago when I first
heard of this, but this is the first
this is, like, really beginning to flesh out.
It's developing sensors which map the imperceptible movements
of a human face
to determine the words someone is thinking
before they're spoken.
They call it silent speech
or pre speech. Of course, it just happens
to come from an Israeli intelligence company. What
a coincidence. Like everything else that's doing this.
Nothing weird to see there. And it appears
to be exactly as sinister as it sounds,
they write. QAI was founded by Avid,
Mizelles,
Avi Barala,
and and Jotan Wexler,
all of whom hone their skills by testing
technologies on apartheid of apartheid in Palestine.
Mazel is a former commander of unit eighty
one, which is the IDF division which builds
Israel's offensive cyber weapons. Bayala, according to his
LinkedIn, was an intelligence officer in the Israeli
Air Force, while Wexler is a former unit
eighty two hundred agent. I mean, come on,
guys. You You really just think it's just
that kind these this is you then then
let's forget. Like, don't forget what we just
showed you. Don't forget the point of the
the,
Whitney's article and and the report coming from
intelligence or literally from one of their entities
saying, we do this. We build these companies
to progress the intelligence. It's all on the
record. Or, like I said, the clip from
sixty Minutes. Like, this is what we do.
Right? And so this is not just some
parallel. These are Israeli intelligence
groups
that are using these companies to progress their
agenda. And this is your government allowing them,
not this is Apple, but it's the same
point in a larger sense, but going back
to Palantir or anything else, your government not
just using them, but allowing them to immerse
themselves with The US
intelligence, with US information, with the idea of
your personal data from the AI overlap.
All of that is easy to prove if
you really care to look. And we've proven
it in the shows where we cover those
things specifically. My point in saying any of
that is because people seem to just dismiss
these things. Probably just out of self preservation
because it's terrifying. I get it. But it's
real.
Now it says, in regard to the genocide,
an executive at Google Ventures revealed that 30%
of QAI's more than a 100 staff were
called up to participate in the genocide of
Gaza.
That means they went over there and were
deployed to something that has been
universally deemed the genocide.
The admission means dozens of people implicated in
genocidal acts who served under the political command
of Yovet Gallant.
The ICC indicted war criminal
are now Apple employees.
It should be a huge scandal. The biggest
company in The United States, one of the
world's most recognizable names, has folded into its
staff dozens of people who serve in the
military during the period it committed genocide,
according to all of the world's most acclaimed
rights experts.
But every single mainstream article which covered the
news of the deal from Reuters to the
Financial Times
ignored that.
Again, like we were saying earlier, that's a
conscious choice. There's not a confusing point here,
guys. They know the entirety of the world
is q where they're supposed US government is
supposed to arrest them the moment they see
them.
And that's not gonna be included about that
government involved with something like this? I mean,
how else do you take that? That means
somebody at the highest levels of that company,
whether it's financial time, whatever it is, Reuters,
has made sure that does not get pointed
to. I'm willing to bet you there are
people that work there that are like, are
you kidding me right now? The Alison Morrow
types that are going this is their wake
up moment probably going, what? How could you
not include that? Right? But they just find
somebody else willing to step into the role
because they know what they're marching on. This
is the manufacturing consent point.
Right? You have those moments where people suddenly
realize that there's some a 100,000 people waiting
in the wings right now going, I just
wanna be popular. I just want influence. I
want reach. I wanna be I wanna make
money.
And they and they and they go, I
got it. I won't even bring that up.
Right? That and then that eventually turns back
into, we don't even know we're doing it
anymore. It's it's it's the process, guys.
It says,
Apple has paid $2,000,000,000
for something that barely appears to exist.
QAI's website consists of 15 words. To find
out exactly what the company does, you have
to look beyond the press releases to the
parent the patents of QAI and its founders
have filed,
which are right here,
which is as they write dystopian. I agree.
It says, yeah, all the patents read like
plots from these kind of dystopian films. It
says, one filing details technology capable of, quote,
determining an emotional state of an individual
based on facial skin micro movements. Now, of
course, the first point for most people that
wanna pretend like it's never a big deal
will say, oh, it's just about, you know,
some kind of,
I don't know, like some kind like somebody
who
has some kind of deficiency or they're blind
or they can't hear you. Whatever it is,
ultimately comes into some way where you can,
like, use that information to help the you
know, whatever. That's actually a bad example. I'm
trying to think of off the top of
my head, like, you know, like the whole
neuroling point. Like, there'd be some kind of
a benign reason why this would make sense,
or that it'll help people in in, you
know, loud environments or, like, whatever it comes
down to. Right? My point though is that
across all of that, even if there's a
valid reason for why this might make sense,
you know if you're
even remotely paying attention that this will be
or already probably is being utilized for surveillance
on you. Or in places where it's not
supposed to be the reality, where your governments
are using it to find out if you
hate ICE, for example, which is happening right
now. Just subpoenas from the DHS, you know,
the ones that made fun of Biden for
doing the same thing.
Censored to to find out who said the
things about ICE. Not a crime. Just we
don't like ICE. Oh, now you're being tracked
by the government. Exactly the same point. And
they've also censored, by the way, so they're
all the same thing.
But in this
case,
details technology capable determining an emotional state of
an individual based on the way your face
moves. So it will be used as surveillance
probably already is. And then, of course, you
get into the conversation of, well, what happens
when they misread that? What happens when the
AI makes a mistake? What happens when they
lie about what it says? Well, that's the
same conversation we're already living through with every
other form of tech they're using to control
you. It says the same filing says the
technology could be used, quote, to identify
a user based on heart rate and breathing
rate.
Another filing says QAI software synthesizes speech in
response to words articulated silently by the test
subject. Now I'm struggling to find an example
to to show, you know, why somebody might
say this will work in this circumstance. You
know why? Because it's hard to make sense
of why this would be used for anything
other than government surveillance of people they don't
want, you know, of you, of their own
populations, of a mass, you know,
1984
reality where this is being used to suss
out your real opinions because we know, wink,
wink, what you really think.
Show me a world where this is gonna
help. You know, that's what this is about,
guys. And it's be that's why Apple is
investing because this is the future of their
control structure.
QIA that's my opinion, obviously. QAI's technology centers
around, quote, silent speech, what they call it.
In the world of suppression and censorship and
and, you know, criminalizing speech, isn't that chilling?
This is the idea that before we vocalize
words and move our mouths to emit sounds,
our brain has already set sent signals to
muscles in our throat and face determining what
we're going to say. I find it hard
to believe that would be somehow consistent, but
who knows if it's just being used to
spread to claim we're thinking certain things. QAI
claims to have invented infrared sensors that can
pick up on these prespeech micromovements.
It would be a guess at best, in
my opinion. But it says tech bloggers have
suggested Apple has bought the company to enable
nonverbal control of an iPhone and other devices,
there's one example, via its AirPod earphones. Come
on. Really? Why would that even be necessary?
And it says, an annotated diagram included with
the patent shows a person wearing glasses and
an earpiece integrated with the technology. It's already
being used in this way, in the in
the patent anyway.
So, the idea of a phone, you know
what I mean? Like, so so what you
can you know, what I mean, really, what
it comes down to, what is the idea
of being able to map everything about us
in that very maybe this is just the
step to get us to to start giving
us information to be able to get there.
Thank you till you make it kinda point.
But overall,
all of the stuff that's being absorbed through
this will still just be data that's used
even if this is a lie.
It'll still be absorbing your biometric data. I
mean, everything.
Now, it says, nonetheless, $2,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
for a non existent technology and a three
year old company.
Sort of sounds like Moderna and COVID nineteen,
doesn't it? We live in an illusion. It's
unprecedented.
What isn't unprecedented, however, is a US tech
giant overpaying for an for an Israeli company.
It says, and Israel is critical to Apple
in a general sense. It is.
The company has a large r and d
campus in the country. It's actually second biggest
outside The United States into which large numbers
of unit 8,200,
unit 81 graduates are funneled.
Apple CEO Tim Cook is a devoted Zionist,
has visited Israel on numerous occasions, and in
2018 received an award from Zionist lobby group
ADL for his efforts to censor anti Israel
speech.
Apple has made good on that promise over
the last two years, sacking staff or expressing
pro Palestine, anti genocide views. Cook has never
spoken about Gaza.
A few days after the QAI deal, the
head of neurotechnology
at Israel's directorate of defense research and development,
the country's equivalent to The US's DARPA program,
gave her first ever interview to Israeli media.
Funny about that. Two days after the QAI
deal. How funny? In the interview, she referenced
QAI. Oh, it's totally obvious there's a connection
there then. And said the Israeli military is
working on similar technology.
So yeah. But this is your technology.
That's not even a secret. This is it's
not like QAI is a random company. This
is unit this is Israeli intelligence people who
are still connected to their intelligence program. So
this is a play, guys.
Oh, no. We're doing our own thing over
here. That's your thing.
Come on. And then my point is that's
not even my opinion. This is what they've
done in the past, where they keep this
fake barrier between, you know, like APAC, for
example.
You know, it's you can easily look up
the starting point of APAC and realize it
was an Israeli entity that was then just
completely converted into something they claim is US.
And we could talk about JFK and the
connection to the con you know, the the
FARA Act. The point is that this is
how we operate, and you can prove it,
and then we still lie about it, which
shows you that the people in power know
that and don't care or are completely controlled
or, you know, both. But the point is
like, there's probably other options there. My point,
though, is that, clearly, there's a collection of
people deciding to pretend like
it's
not
obvious.
She says the interview she referenced QAI and
said the Israeli military is working on similar
technology. The US has a DARPA project known
as Silent Talk, which is also working
on working to develop pre speech sensing and
nonverbal control technologies. Now realize,
I'm blending some things here in the sense
that we're talking about Apple as a company
buying Israeli
tech created by
Israeli intelligence people.
What Israel's saying is as our as our
government, we're working on similar technology, which my
point is that's the same thing, but that
over there, The US is working on their
own thing. So those are if government's talking
about their projects, then you have got a
company working with people connected to that working
over
here. My opinion is it's all the same
thing. This is just the way that they
keep these things kind of compartmentalized
and framed so that it can become a
com frame and the same kind of oh,
it's a US new company or start a
solution. We'll talk about in a second. It's
a Delaware US company. No. It's not. That's
just the argument on paper when every other
part of it is based out of Israel.
It's a game, and they don't even hide
it because the system, as I just said,
will just pretend it's not obvious, and some
people buy that.
Once the technology is developed, the prespeech established
as a legitimate biological human function, how far
will precrime be? I mean, precrime's already happening
now, as Whitney's been discussing back to Bill
Barr before. It's been going on.
Medical precrime to a same similar degree. This
simply adds to this where, as he says,
established as legitimate. Even if it's fake, it
becomes, oh, well, here's the look at the
video. Can't you tell, you know,
good or pretty, you could tell that based
on facial that they were really waiting to
kill them? And And that becomes we know
that based on the technology.
Well, what if it's fake? What are they
lying about it? The same way they lie
about nine you know, everything when they need
to. It can be abused.
That's maybe the whole point.
One can imagine it now. Based on our
silent speech
detector, we have determined you were going to
say something hateful and anti Semitic or un
American, and therefore under arrest, or you're a
terrorist. Exactly.
It should be chilling, and this is not
some kind of joke. This is not some
hyperbolic Alex Jones point. This is literally what's
happening and the
the logical possible outcome based on their previous
actions.
It may go a different direction. I certainly
hope so. But it's not some kind of
hype, guys. This is legitimately where we are.
Wait. Make sure I didn't miss that. What
was that one?
Okay. Yeah. Same one. Now, here's the patent
and everything else as well. I'll include that
if you wanna go deeper on it. Now,
we've talked about this for a while, and
these are some of the quick ones I
grabbed. This is from 2025.
Remember, this is this is actually really relevant.
We just went through this with Gideon,
which, by the way, is also actually out
there. The US' new Israeli made AI precrime
system. Remember this conversation? We talked about it
when, oh my gosh, what do you know?
It was actually Minnesota.
Weird how everything swirls around the same control
points. That doesn't make any sense, does it?
Well, when somebody got killed in Minnesota, remember,
and Melania Trump came out and said, We
need to be able to identify them before
they do that. Remember that? And that's when
Whitney tweeted this and said, well, I warned
about precrime to stop mass shootings before this
happened for years. Her and I have had
interviews and conversations about that 15 times. It
stems to largely her work because she's been
breaking this down for a long time. Talking
about having it right here. I wrote about
Epstein, Peter Thiel, Carbine, as well as Trump's
previous precrime push. It's been around for a
long time. But so this
was what we were discussing at the time.
And remember there was the shooting, and then
all of a sudden, you got this guy,
Aaron
Cohen, totally and
legitimately and publicly connected to Israeli intelligence,
who comes out and says, on the back
of that crazy thing, we need an AI
system that flags threats before they happen.
Remember that, guys? Remember that when we told
you maybe it's just an extension of the
same discussion. Different names. It's all driving you
in the same direction.
This is where you got the overlap with
Sean Ryan and the fake e It's just
nonstop
that we're being gaslit.
But recognize that this is part of it.
And it's all happening. It's all stemming through
Israel, and all of it stems back, at
least in one way or another, to Epstein.
That's not the same as saying that it
all is central to Epstein. But the point
is the Epstein element, whatever it is, is
an insight into this larger game that's being
played. And, yeah, it does. Everything seems to
run through this to one degree or another.
I'll include this, Whitney's interview with with myself
in 2023,
Whitney Webb interview, CIA, Mossad linked surveillance systems
quietly installed throughout The United States. We've been
calling this out for far too long as
it continues to happen. We'll go back to
Whitney's article in 2020.
The truth about The United States continuity of
government plans and the coronavirus perfect storm. And
it talks ex at least in part about
exactly what we're discussing,
overlapping with the,
main core
continent of government conversation where they were mapping
out dissonance, in one case, and on the
other side of that, the idea of the
ubiquitous mass surveillance of those dissidents and, really,
just Americans. But in this case, discussing this
in light of the COVID nineteen direction of
precrime and all the rest of it. It's
just it's been building for quite a while.
And on that note, let's play this clip
that you might have seen before. We this
is in the article
of when they discussed the continuity of government
plans and how they say, well, that's top
secret. We can't talk about that. When the
whole point was about justifying
the suspension of the constitution
because of an emergency.
I mean, this is where we are, guys.
This is it's all happening in front of
us like we've been telling you for quite
a long time. And this is not some
hyperbolic, subjective point.
Why it's happening and how it connects, you
can decide. I'm simply pointing to verifiable realities
right in front of you that we've been
telling you were going to happen for years,
like a lot of people have. It's not
just us. Just realize that it's not something
to ignore. North, in your work at the,
NSC,
were you not assigned at one time to
work on plans for the continuity of government
in the event of a major disaster?
Mister chairman.
I believe that question touches upon a highly
sensitive and classified
area.
So may I request that
you not touch upon that, sir?
I was particularly concerned, mister chairman,
because
I read in Miami papers and several others
that there had been a plan,
developed
by that same agency,
a contingency
plan in the event of emergency that would
suspend the American
in which he had worked.
I believe that it will be well. I
most I most respectfully request that that matter
not be touched upon at this stage.
If we wish to get into this, uncertain
arrangements can be made for an executive session.
Yeah. Right? We we don't need the American
people to know what's going on here, do
we? We don't we don't want them to
know. We'll go behind closed doors, and we'll
discuss the reality of how, you know, this
is this this
is in effect
or rather just, I should say, the the
one of the my opinion, the most logical
argument of when the deep state, whatever you
believe that when that was something that truly
became, you know, into effect.
A parallel government,
arguably, that never actually went away, that was
ultimately created for this purpose, that became the
unelected ever the never you know, the unelected,
always present,
power structure. And that that's the the honest
representation of whatever we call the deep state,
which is what the per term applies to.
Right? The deep state. Not the one we're
talking about. That's what Kevork is pointing to.
And you call it something else. Deep state,
the term has become so mired in so
many BS things. It just means the unelected
power structure, the reality of the way things
operate.
That's what we're talking about here, at least
in part. Now here
is a point about
surveillance.
It's the same kinda larger point, but I
thought it was important to include this in
regard to Trump's administration,
the contradiction of calling out Biden for doing
things similar in regard to censorship and surveillance.
So this is a new story that's been
going around last couple of days. Big tech
confirms Department of Homeland Security subpoenas.
Meta, Google,
Discord, all Instagram, I think as well. They
targeted people who were simply posting about ICE.
Not breaking the law, not even the idea
that maybe they're wink, wink, meaning violence, just
anybody going, ICE sucks. ICE shouldn't exist.
And demanding in a way that seems borderline
unprecedented
your information, your home address, your phone number,
everything.
And realize, in case you have already missed
that, which means Israel has that too, which
may not even be meaningful to somebody about
this point, unless you think they're gonna be
marching down the streets and coming after you.
But let's realize, isn't that what ICE and
the US government is if we understand the
way this is working today? Well, it's worth
considering.
Google, Meta, and Reddit
now acknowledge they have complied
with Department of Homeland Security subpoenas seeking to
identify users who have denounced
ICE.
That's it.
Hundreds, hundreds of administrative
subpoenas.
Right? How interesting is this? All everything seems
to be changing. We talk about administrative warrants
and how those are being relied on as
opposed to judicial warrants. The same kind of
point we're gonna make here. We'll get to
that in a second. Hundreds of administrative
subpoenas issued by DHS,
not judges,
reportedly
have been served to major tech companies as
DHS attempts to crack down on critics of
ICE deployments in cities nationwide. The subpoenas, once
reserved for dealing with time sensitive crises like
child abductions, you know, now that's less important
to them now than just focusing on Americans
saying things protected under free speech. Right?
Appear to be aimed at unmasking account holders
who have criticized ICE or pointed out locations
where ICE agents are stationed. All of which
is completely legal because, one, it's a public
serving position that you're allowed to be aware
of. And, yes, police tracking has been roundly
upheld by the Supreme Court and underling court
forever.
The truth is they're required to identify themselves,
they're acting in the public interest, and you're
obviously allowed to be there to be to
film in any sense because that's your right,
or to just be present.
And if you wanted to you wanna track
where they're going and build them accountable, that's
up to you. You're allowed to do that.
When it borderline become when something about their
address, when it comes to something you can't
just keep acting like the intentions of the
left are dangerous, therefore, things that would otherwise
be normal are suddenly now bad and dangerous.
The masking, you know, they gotta cover themselves
because there's no evidence of anything other than
the normal circumstances happening. People have always been
crazy or acted out or that police could
be attacked or anybody could be attacked.
That's not to say that you ignore the
law because of that. The point is you're
required to show your face. Show you have
to show your face. If somebody's gonna go
out and act against them, then arrest that
person. Show everybody what happens to somebody who
does that. The argument is not because of
that, therefore, we'll break the law in response.
It's just insane how that continues to be
something people think makes sense. So in this
case,
people who are simply going, that's where they're
operating. And by the way, as they're breaking
law, makes it even more relevant, they're now
being tracked and the same thing happening in
reverse.
They want all your information. Now back to
the point about the administrative
subpoena. Why do you think that is, guys?
Because they can give it to themselves,
which is exactly why that should never be
the reality. Now there are specific circumstances where
you might rationalize why that'd be needed, same
with the administrative warrant. I frankly disagree. I
think it's just an extension and way to
maneuver around the Constitution, even to the smallest
degree, even when it's an immigrant. But in
this case, you're talking about getting the instead
of a judge going yes, you can give
that subpoena to the social media company and
demand personal information from that person, which would
otherwise be protected. I'm willing to bet you
a judge would not be okay with that.
Because right now, we've been built and there
there's been a lot of precedents created based
on Trump's criticizing of Biden's administration,
doing the same thing.
In many ways, censoring, suppressing, cataloguing information about
people saying things about Israel.
Also, what they're doing now.
But, so, this is them
creating a way that they can step around
that and just sign their own administrative warrants
or subpoenas in this case, which, as it
says, is not the way this usually works.
At least one of the corporations
cooperating with the DHS crackdown says it has
notified relevant users, which they all should, if
they're honest people, then you going, hey. Thiscom
this government's trying to get your information, and
giving them two weeks to fight the subpoena
in court before the company realizes they're anti
ice missives post. I guarantee you, my opinion,
that the companies that gave people the insight
are going to be attacked in some way,
whether it's discernible to us or not by
the Trump administration. That person will lose their
job. The company will you know, something. That's
how this administration has been showing they will
act, petty and small and and vindictive.
The idea that they are supposed to they're
they're this company has no allegiance to the
government. It's their job is to protect the
rights of their people and to do what
they say their company is supposed to do.
So when the government comes out and does
this for no other reason they want it,
the company should be like, f off. There's
no way I'm gonna give you that information.
There's no logical reason. There's no legal reason.
So
they are I would argue required to stand
up and to protect that personal information.
But so when they come out and say,
oh, they gave it to them. My point
will be that somebody's gonna be attacked for
that because this is what they show. Then
it chills that action. Then future companies are
gonna go screw that. I'm not taking on
the Trump administration whether right or wrong. And
that's how it happened. Then you get these
morally ambiguous people. They become more you know,
it's just it's a it's a constant cycle
creating more and more of that problem.
Amazon is among the companies most prominently suspected
of leading support to ICE's mass deportation efforts.
Last fall, Jeff Bezos owned conglomerates, Ring Division,
as we told you at the time and
still I just recently touched on again, announced
it would begin sharing content from users' doorbell
cameras with Flock, an AI powered network that
feeds information to local and federal law enforcement
agencies. Did you sign up for that? Did
you know that? I mean, did you ask
for that? It's your device that you bought,
and now it's being sent to everybody. It's
just,
how do we not see where this is
sprinting right now? Critics claim the deal provides
ICE with easy access to all of it
claims.
They've already shown you that. It's been proven.
Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Netflix, OpenAI, Paramount
plus Uber,
Twitter,
all of them are working with giving your
Twitter acting like you're the free speech savior
pushing back against the deep state government. No.
They're happily handing over your information, like we
found out with GARM, like we found out
with examples before that. What is it? 93%
of the time, they were complying with government
demands? That was Biden's administration. Here we are.
Same thing, guys. They're just they're just hypocrites.
They're just fronting. They want you to believe
that they are whatever they need to be
to make you think they are what they
want you to think. It's simple, guys.
This is the New York Times edition to
this. Same conversation.
Now it adds, the Department of Homeland Security
is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who
oppose ICE by sending tech companies legal requests
for the names,
email addresses, telephone numbers, and other identifying data.
Like what?
Right? Like, what else? I mean, they clearly
made a point to say, other identifying data?
What?
Other than that, it would either be less
specific or more. I find it hard to
believe they would wanna know what shirt you
were wearing. Right? So think about that for
a second. Your address is insane to me.
Your personal I mean, it also says your
email address, but, you know, simply the idea
that it's personal identifying information.
And it says data behind social media accounts
that track or criticize the agency. Now, it
says, quote, the government is taking more liberties
than they used to,
says,
ace,
ACLU.
It's a whole other level of frequency and
lack of accountability.
So think about this. Their government's taking more
liberties than they used to. So understand that
the, the allegations of Biden and what they
were doing matter. And it was say it
was illegal.
At least according to the ACLU in this
case, what current government's doing is more than
usual.
And it says, it's, where was it? The
oh, that's just last part, you're saying who
they are representing. It says the over the
last six months, mister Lomi has represented people
whose social media accounts information was sought by
the Department of Homeland Security.
Because he they they're getting representation. I would
too. ICE agents told protesters
in Minneapolis in Chicago that they were being
recorded and identified with facial recognition. Right? Lyons
just flatly denied that in front of Congress.
We can prove it's happening. Last month, Tom
Homan, the White House border czar,
also said on Fox News that he was
pushing to, quote, create a database.
Maybe they should all collect and maybe get
their stories straight, you know, of people who
were arrested or interference, impeding, insult. So that
impeding means standing there filming. They've already made
that clear. And even in court, they were
requ or rather, in front of Congress, all
of them had to say on the record
that that's not true, but they're doing it
anyway.
Social media is not true that, like, you
filming and being there and even yelling, cursing,
all obviously within your rights. We all know
that. But they were fighting they were calling
it threatening and and violence, Rubio, Bondi, Noam,
all of them.
Some social media companies previously fought government requests
for user information. They used to. Not really
anymore, because that's my point. They've been chill.
They know that if they push back, there
will be consequences, even though doing the right
thing,
and doing what they're supposed to do shouldn't
be something the government punishes them for. In
2017,
Twitter
sued the federal government to stop an administrative
subpoena, like they're using right now, that asked
it to unmask an account critical of the
Trump administration.
Then the subpoena was later withdrawn.
So, Elon Musk, you explain for me why
well, I mean, this I what was I
don't think no. That wasn't him at the
point. But either way, there's still the same
point that in 2017,
Twitter
stood up, at least in this case, whether
it was more of a, you know,
a a way to I mean, the point
is who I'm not suggesting Twitter's on your
side. Maybe this was in their interest to
make this case, whatever. But in 2017, Twitter
stood up and stopped,
sued the federal government
for doing exactly what they're doing right now.
Administrative subpoena, asking to amass an account,
and Twitter said, no. I'm gonna sue you.
Today,
apparently, the free speech warrior that is Elon
Musk was like, here. Take it. No port.
No worries, which is what happened.
Twitter has already complied. They've already given over
the information. That's been already widely reported.
So explain for me why he's the free
speech warrior when he's just complying with government
mandates where even when Jack was pushing back.
And again, I'm not saying any of them
are on your side, but think about that
contrast.
Obviously, Elon Musk is not a free speech
warrior. That's pretty
I mean, quite frankly,
like, you're worthy of ridicule if you still
actually think that, let alone say it out
loud. Unlike arrest warrants, which require a judge's
approval, administrative subpoenas are issued by the Department
of Homeland Security.
But last year, the department ramped up its
use of subpoenas to unmask anonymous accounts. So
that means in Trump's administration,
they ramped up the effort
to de anonymize people online because they didn't
like your opinions.
Can you imagine the outcry if that was
Biden? We've heard it to a degree. They're
censoring too, guys. Let's just stop being children
about this. They're just as bad. In September,
for example, it sent meta administrative subpoenas to
identify the people behind Instagram accounts that posted
about ICE raids in California.
According to the ACLU,
the subpoenas were challenged in court. The Department
of Homeland Security
withdrew the requests. Funny how that continues to
work out.
Why? Because they don't have any standing. There's
no legal justification for what they're doing. But
they wanna stand there and posture and claim
that everyone should be scared. Well, yeah. They're
probably trying to, you know anyway, I'm not
gonna assume. But the bottom line is that
they're doing it anyway.
Even as they keep losing, even as the
judge you know, it doesn't matter. And And
they're still doing it. They don't care about
your rights to the constitution. That should be
clear by now. The government doesn't. I mean,
in a hearing on January 14 in the
US district court for the Northern District Of
California, the ACLU argued that the government was
using administrative subpoenas
to target people whose speech it did not
agree with.
I mean, I'm no I mean, I there's
it's, the ACLU, for example, I've seen them
do things I thought were ridiculous. I've seen
them stand up for things like this, for
example, but I think are good. It's just
it's not about siding with something or the
other. It's about acknowledging the argument. Right? So
in this case, they're standing up and saying
they're going after you because of your ideas
that they didn't agree with. Period.
Why in the world that would be something
anybody agrees with? I mean, what's your argument
if you disagree with that? Are you somehow
saying that you're not allowed to have an
opinion about ICE, or are you just okay
with ignoring their rights when it's somebody you
dislike? I'd like to believe the majority of
Americans are in the middle of that, which
is that we understand it's wrong whatever side
you think you're on. I'd like to believe
that. I hope so.
Sarah Bal, Bal Kasun, the Department of Justice
lawyer representing the government, said the Department of
Homeland Security's position was that it was, quote,
within their power to investigate threats
to its own officers or impediments to their
officers. That's how the game is played. Simply
again, that's just them going, we have the
right to investigate threats. The point is, all
they're really showing you is that you're a
threat if you say I sucks. You're a
threat to them if you simply say, that's
not what they should be doing. You're a
threat to them if you say ICE is
breaking the law.
And that you're now impeding
by simply being present. You're impeding by
tracking their movements. All of which you're legally
allowed to do. So, again, you're a threat
to them if you act within your rights.
Two days later, subpoena was withdrawn.
Again.
They just keep doing this, guys. It's this
is repetitive.
This is them trying to change the reality
of how things operate.
And to some degree, it's working.
Now lastly, just a quick point, and we'll
end with some other,
kind of Israel related points to what's going
on to really make that point more clear
about what entity we're talking about here. We
talked about recently start Stardust Solutions, keeping this
in the mind of the conversation today, right,
with just a few points we're making about
how it interconnects with some kind of a
larger apparatus that is building.
The star the Stardust Solutions geoengineering part of
this or just the general idea of this
and stemming back to the larger, you know,
Israel in this case, but there's more just
the globalist community.
This conversation is is I what's the right
word for it?
Excuse me. I'm actually surprised
that they wrote this the way they did.
Center for International Environmental Law,
calling it out. I mean, exactly. And this
has been public since the moment they started
this, but it's being seen for what I
was calling out, which is that this is
going to be a as, I mean, as
I titled it, being held hostage by geoengineering.
This is an Israeli company creating a platform,
which they once they start, they will not
be able to stop to their own admission.
Otherwise, the world will spin enough control
in the sense of, like, weather gets crazy.
That's what their statements say.
So now we're rushing forward to start this
now. That's happening right now.
This is from 10/28/2025,
telling you that in April 2026, they are
gonna start this.
I'm I'm convinced that this is going to
cause a situation where then they have absolute
control because if they stop what they're doing,
it will cause chaos.
At least that's the set of the narrative.
I'll read this to you directly.
Now,
this show, we go over a couple things.
One was that discussion, but the other, we
go over the DARPA's new generative optogenetics program,
which is a whole other conversation, but it
does add to this if you wanna get
into it. It's it's alarming, and it is
influence control. Like, when Epstein's point about researching
things that remove free will, optogenetics is discussed
as a way to influence control actions, thought
processes. It's very clear.
Now
US Israeli,
which is a play about it's it's not.
It's it's an Israeli company,
completely packed and run with Israelis largely from
the Israeli nuclear program.
Excuse me. Hold on one sec.
So it reads 10/28/2025.
US Israeli startup announces reckless solar geoengineering experiments.
The US Israeli startup, Stardust Solutions, plans to
begin outdoor experiments.
So it's it's experiment using your world with
your lives. It's happening in Israel already as
far as I can tell, of a highly
controversial solar geoengineering
technology
for April 2026.
Stardust also announced that it has raised $60,000,000
in financing from broad coalition investors, ranging from
Silicon Valley, venture capitalists,
which so right now,
very quickly, they've been lobbying aggressively Trump's administration.
I pointed this out in many examples. To
the best of my knowledge, I've yet to
see them endorse it or support it, which
would be I mean, honestly, it would be
just as crazy as them creating Stargate.
It would. I'm willing to bet you that
the same Nick Sord or ridiculous people out
there would be like, yay. The good geoengineer
or the good climate change or, you know,
whatever they ridiculously do to support it. I
don't know how you get past Stargate and
mRNA shots, which they're still doing. We'll talk
about that in the next show tomorrow.
There's a shot that they are funding right
now that is mRNA. That's a universal flu
shot. We'll talk about it tomorrow. But the
point
is that
there it's obvious that this is they're trying
to get Trump's investment in this, or rather
just the US government.
And I think it's a hard sell, clearly.
But my point would be from Silicon Valley
venture capitalist. Like, you could argue that it's
easy for them to just go, you know,
you got Peter Thiel or anybody else they
work with to say, well, here's one of
our funds that we can use to sort
of shell this out and still fund that
without it being clear it's coming from us.
So I always think about that today and
and wonder why it's as clear as it
can be sometimes. But aside from that, recognize
that this is supported by people like Bill
Gates and even Peter Thiel, by the way,
at least in the in the direction of
the of the, the, technology. Now it says
that they announced $60,000,000 in financing ranging from
Silicon Valley Venture Capitalist to the largest shareholders
in luxury sports car manufacturer, Ferrari, and Italian
football club,
Juventus,
according to Politico. Now this is in addition
to $15,000,000
already raised from their earlier investors, including controversial
Israeli Canadian venture capital firm, AWZ, which has
been accused of profiting from the ongoing genocide
in Gaza and has a partnership with the
Israeli Ministry of Defense, as I showed you
in the last show. Quite literally a company
that's it's it says Canadian Venture Israel. It's
an Israel company. It's out based in Israel,
and it literally has direct connections to the
Ministry of Defense. That's one part of the
funding. The other parts, as I've gone over
before, all tie back to Israel I mean,
directly. To either their intelligence, to their military
nuclear program, and everyone working within it. I
mean, it's just it's wild to me. Now
that may not mean anything to you. Maybe
you don't care that it's really connected. I
the program is what I worry about, but
knowing what we know about Israel, I think
it was worrisome. I think it's the same
larger conversation, which is why I included it
today. Now it says this is from the,
c the Center for International Environmental Law. It
says, by planning outdoor solar geoengineering experiments as
soon as April 2026,
openly aiming to commercialize tech the technology
and raising the prospect of deployment
this decade,
Stardust Solutions and its investors are accelerating a
reckless race that threatens to put humanity on
a path of no return
to perpetual
dependency
on this extreme technology. I swear it's the
first group I've seen lay it out this
clear. And, also, recognize, I'm willing to bet
you, I haven't done made like, confirmed this
myself, but based on what they are involved
in, I'm willing to bet you anything that
this group very strongly believes in climate change
and believes that this is that we're gonna
destroy the world. Like, my point, I the
whole carbon overlap and the climate change, there's
a lie. Very strongly rooted in all of
that. But it's not the same as saying
we're not destroying the planet. Our governments and
what they're doing are very much so doing
that. But it's not about stopping carbon to
save the planet. I don't think that's the
reality. I think the evidence proves otherwise. But
you can disagree. My point in saying all
of that
is that in this case,
what was
it? Oh, I just lost my train of
thought there. Is it ultimately,
shoot. That was a that was a valid
point there. It was important, I think.
Oh, that's what it was. The point is
that the group we're talking about
is calling to stop this,
saying, don't you know, this is a bad
thing. This is gonna hurt everybody even while
I would argue they're still supportive of, like,
we need to, you know,
work with UN to stop carbon and fight
the climate change. Okay.
So recognize that even if that's what they
believe, and I don't believe that, that they're
still at least objective enough to be able
to recognize that this is not the path,
that this is going to actually cause more
problems. So if you understand what what I
believe is that it's a lie to start
with, and they're building this to justify the
lies built to justify these kind of actions,
even people that believe it are still able
to recognize that this agenda is I mean,
even if you think it has the positive
outcome,
where it's at now,
I mean, is a gamble at best.
And that's why I wonder whether I mean,
that's why I think there's more behind this,
quite frankly. But so that being said, it
says solar geoengineering is inherently unpredictable and risks
further breaking and see, that's right. An already
broken climate system. With uneven global impacts predicted,
employment would create winners and losers. Think of
the political overlap to that.
The political, you know, what that the implications
for how that can be applied for a
political benefit. Now it says, undermining the rights
of billions of people and raising the central
question of who gets to control the global
thermostat.
You know, what what do you think they
would have to do? What, you know, we're
gonna do it for our benefit, and then
we're gonna make sure Iran is always a
150 degrees. You know what I mean? Like,
that's think about what they're involved with and
what that might mean.
Quote, deployment scenarios for the kind of technology
that Stardust is developing
involve
continuous
dumping of particles in the atmosphere
over hundreds of years with any pause or
stop bringing
the risk of rapidly spiraling temperatures as a
result of termination shock. That's what they call
it. Solar geoengineering deployment would be ungovernable
in a fair and democratic way
and would likely be controlled by a handful
of major powers and corporations.
Exact it's just so obvious, man. And I
think that's gonna drive like, already where this
is might already be, by the way, but
is driving to.
That they create a circumstance where they can
then decide like, it's it's it's being held
hostage. I think that's very clear.
An idea I mean, that they're dumping all
this, which they've been doing in in Israel
already. You you know, and you must realize
this is a very public conversation. Bill Gates,
the rest of them, they all know about
this. Donald
Trump, who on the surface is fighting all
the bad Democrat climate change. Well, Israel is
very clearly involved with this. This is based
out of Delaware. You think they don't know
this is happening? Why wouldn't they be standing
up and going, absolutely not. You can't allow
this.
I mean, that doesn't have to mean that
you are aware or support it, but I
think it's worth considering that somebody in our
government is very aware this is happening, and
it's April we're talking about, and they haven't
said a word.
You could even argue that probably implies consent.
My opinion.
Impossible to fully test for unintended
or unintended impacts without extended large scale implementation.
Sort of like with the COVID shot thing.
What did Fauci say? Well, you're never really
gonna know until you start getting it out
there.
Exactly.
The it the and it says the, the
line between testing and deployment is blurred
with small scale experiments geared towards technology development
and normalization.
Stardust and its backers cannot be allowed to
flout international law by developing and normalizing this
extraordinarily dangerous technology.
It's time for a nonuse agreement to put
solar geoengineering
off the table for good
and refocus urgently on tackling the root causes
of the climate crisis. Now whether you agree
with the last point or not, we can
all agree, even people that disagree that strongly
on something like that, that this is not
the direction, that what they're doing
seems to be designed
to create the system that then makes you
reliant on that system forever.
That's I I mean, you can't create a
better control structure for a kind of government
we're dealing with, guys.
I am convinced at some level that this
is being at least being considered
for that exact point.
Now as Janice Gurl points out,
senator Ted Budd introduced a bill called The
US Israel Futures Act, which is a senate
bill that mirrors the house bill called The
US Israel Defense Partnership Act, of course, because
left and right means nothing when it comes
to governments US governments' blame support for the
real controller of this country, it seems.
These bills hand America's tech crown and bleeding
edge advanced technology
to Israel
on your dime.
That's where this goes.
I mean and this is where we get
into the point of the transition from just
dumping money blindly in the hands of Israel,
I don't know why we've ever been okay
with that, to pretending now it's about investment.
It's it's it is a narrative change,
as always, guys. Standard Oil to the breakup.
Oh, guess what? They were actually far more
powerful and financially, you know, the whole James
Corbitt made this point over the years, right?
The Standard Oil was broken up, and it
gave the illusion of the fact that they
were made weak and we had to break
up the monopoly, but it was coordinated to
make the ultimately, the endpoint was they were
more powerful because of it, had more influence
because of it, and the average person couldn't
even see it anymore.
That's a perfect analogy for where we're going
right now. They know we see the problem,
so they're trying to break up Standard Oil
and make us look at it.
We heard you, and now we did it.
But the reality is it's not broken up.
It's decompartmentalized.
They're creating a circumstance where they actually have
more control, but they want you to think
they don't. It's actually a perfect analogy for
where we're going.
Before we go into the next part, which
will end on the kind of some Israel
points,
here's what Ryan Raspbiani shared. Here's what Netanyahu
was telling you. This is the transition.
Is this America first?
So we can afford
to phase out
the
financial component of the military aid that we're
receiving. And I propose a ten year drawdown
to zero.
Now in the three years that remain in
the present memorandum of understanding
and another seven years. Which by the way,
Trump has increased by billions every single time
he's been in power. Drawdown to zero. So
guess twice.
Israel
will support itself and does.
No. It doesn't. That's a lie. I mean,
that's that's we should all laugh. The crowd
should laugh. I mean, you're literally saying you're
getting 4 point $3,800,000,000
on top of the billions and billions they
give for every other million reasons in between
that, and you're somehow already relying on yourself.
No. You're not. That's a pathetically ridiculous lie.
You just told us you make that money
for everybody. You see my point though? This
is just management, guys. That's narrative control. Just
as we fight for ourselves.
At the same time, we want to move
fight for ourselves. Just as we
fought itself and does. Nope. Just as we
fight for ourselves. Nope. I mean, really? Are
you actually pretending that's the case? I mean,
there's been an international involved discussion from day
one, and it has been proven to not
be just Israel.
At the same time, we want to move
with The United States from aid to partnership.
Right. So what it means is nothing changes
other than names.
Right? So we still want the money. Obviously,
we still want the money. We're just gonna
call it partnership
now. Sound good, guys? Because we have phenomenally
gifted
technologists
and developers of all sorts of defense systems.
And we share it with our friend,
the irreplaceable friend of The United States. But
we want to have no You know, while
ignoring them and and lying about them and
stealing from them and and killing Americans and,
you know, all that, and then actually not
doing that at all. But it's fun to
say out loud, though. Pretend it is.
Joint investment.
We put in one part, they put in
equal part, and we share the fruits. But
our goal is to Right. Right. But see
how that actually works is US gives them
$3,800,000,000
and then we have a a month later,
we go, hey. Let's have a joint project.
And they go, okay. I'll put up $3,000,000,000.
And they go, I'll put up $3,000,000,000. Oh,
well, guess what? That was your 3,000,000,000 that
you gave in the first place. So technically,
you're funding the whole thing, American taxpayer. But
let's pretend like that wasn't clear. It happens
all the time.
Build an independent arms industry in Israel.
Oh, good. Oh, that's what we all want,
right? Everyone's clamoring for an independent arms industry
from a government committing genocide as we speak.
I think the entire world understands
what kind of world we enter,
and that's something that we intend to do.
Frankly, I I I don't believe I mean,
what what we got, like, six people clapping?
You know? I mean, at the end of
the day, they've lost their influence, but they
doesn't mean they're gonna stop. Because as I'm
showing you and as we keep talking about,
apparently, that's one of the least important things
in the converse oh, I shouldn't say it
like that, but it's clearly not the most
important thing in the conversation.
It it literally all of us are like,
you're all monsters. We see you. And it
just still goes forward.
And the police still stop you from getting,
you know, everything's still just in play, then
it doesn't matter.
It matters in in regard to how they
can influence this the flux, you know, the
the ebb and flow of society,
but it seems to not have no effect
on their power over us.
And that has to matter, guys. That has
to be very that's where we need to
understand that there needs to be a change.
If what we think and do has no
effect on the outcome and maybe always has,
then maybe we should start clamoring for something
other than the same old system that creates
this dynamic.
He's just acting like we're this is my
whole point about the transition. We are seeing
it. People are waking up to it, so
they go, well, let's it's time for another
fake transition.
Right? Let's just transition into the new thing,
which is just a repackaging of the same
control structure with far more freedom. Or, I
mean, far less freedom is my point. Now,
to finish out,
I think it's important that we see some
of these points as we just highlighted clear.
I mean, it's obviously, if you're paying attention,
it's not just Israel.
In fact, it's Israel is a location.
This is about Zionism. It's about a political
manipulation. It's about a global
dynamic that is changing the way we live
our lives and has been for a really
long time.
That's not even debatable in my opinion.
But so recognize that it's not about making
it about one ethnicity or one group. It's
about the, you know, you can give a
name to anything that's like right now, we're
watching this change. You can call it whatever
you want. People will debate about, like, what
a deep state is or whether that's the
influence. So let's put aside the terminology and
just recognize what we can all see. Right?
That this is happening, that there is some
transition, some flow of power, and recognize that
what we're talking about is a group,
again, outside of the political discussions that are
committing crimes that the whole world can see,
that are committing genocide in front of the
world, who are brag and this is the
point. It's not about debating whether that's what's
happening. You can look at them, brag about
it. You can see them get caught lying
about the biggest claims of what happened on
October 7, and then get exposed 15 times
over from their own people, and yet you
still get your politicians who lie about it.
There's no way to misunderstand that, guys. That
is obvious. And so this is is simply
showing you that these people, in the midst
of that awareness, in the midst of everything
that's happening, are still willing to go, I
side with Israel.
Hashtag America First.
It is time for a change, and you
damn well know it, guys. And it's time
to actually stand up and do that. It's
time to take some level of risk for
what you want the world to be like.
Here's decent news. Do you believe BB bears
any responsibility for the security failures that we
saw on October 7?
Right. You remember the conversation. Here's a good
show that you can watch if you wanna
get in distance from 2024.
It's only gotten more clear since then. The
undeniable reality of October 7, Foreknowledge,
and the Hannibal Directive, which has been
roundly. I mean, from colonels to people in
the military outside of that, to people in
their government who have publicly stated that not
only did they order Hannibal, but that it
continued.
Here we are. So he is up here
going, you know, or rather. He answers the
question,
does he bear responsibility?
Do you believe BB bears any responsibility for
the security failures that we saw on October
7? Well, October 7 was a rough time,
and I guess everybody's responsible with, you know,
look. But it was a terrible attack. It
was a sneak attack.
It was as violent. Do you remember? We
knew this then. I mean, remember, my show
was 2024.
This is I've you know, unfortunately,
I've seen
some of the results at levels that probably
even you, good reporter, but probably you haven't
seen. It was a horrible thing that took
place.
People was surprised. It was a surprise attack.
Nobody saw that coming. He didn't see it
coming. Nobody You mean aside from all the
Israeli IDF members that said we see it
coming? All the men the women in the
towers that said we see them training, we
see it coming. We and they were threatened
with jail time if they kept bringing it
up. You mean aside from that Trump? Would
have seen it coming if they were in
his position. I don't believe. Oh, so nobody
would have in his position
aside from everybody that did.
But, I can tell you he's been a
very good
wartime prime minister. He's been very strong. We've
worked with him very well. We had tremendous
success with Iran and everything else we've done.
Oh, did they? And he really has been.
He's been, you know, extraordinary as far as
a wartime prime minister. Not easy. Hey. Look
at that. Imagine saying that. Now remember, this
is 2025.
Remember,
we knew it then. And even far I
mean, it's it's in a it's a it's
a self evident reality. And I see me
could
they've admitted it. I mean, no, you didn't
even go any further than that. They have
publicly stated that is what happened.
It's a special weird time, isn't it? So
here is Donald Trump
being asked about Beatty. Like, think about and
I'll I'll read what Jeff Carlson said first.
I've never seen a president so totally disconnected
from the people who elected him.
He's been a very good
wartime prime minister. He's been very strong. We've
worked with him very well. We had tremendous
success with Iran and everything else we've done,
And he really has been. He's been, you
know, extraordinary as far as a wartime prime
minister. Not easy.
And, you know, you have a president that
refuses to give him a pardon. I think
that man should be ashamed of himself,
a pardon over this trial that's going on.
The president
of Israel. The primary power he's got is
the power to give pardons. And Yeah. Well,
he's guilty, man. He's guilty. I mean, it's
it's pretty roundly I mean, his own country
thinks that. He is guilty. He's indicted on
multiple things. Oh, and funny, remember indictments? Look,
every everyone in the maggot side is like,
oh my god. They were indicted. It's all
over. Well, guess what? Netanyahu has been indicted,
like, four times. He's running the country. So
it doesn't mean what you think it does.
Guess you, you know, wanna know that. But
realize
it's pretty self the the evidence has been
discussed. It's been come forward. He's had multiple
like, the Israeli media, to put it this
way. I was gonna say in front of
court, for example. These things have come out.
But the Israeli media
will openly state that he continues to find
reasons to push this this off because they
know he's guilty. I just think that's wild
that he can come out and say they
should pardon him for things he's guilty of
while he's committing genocide, mind you. He's not
you know, he he said he's given it
five different times, but he doesn't wanna do
it because I guess he loses his power.
I think the people of Israel should really,
shame him. He's he's he's disgraceful. Who he
is, by the way, but not for the
reasons you're saying. He's the one Herzog is
the one that lied about the, what, the
chemical weapons instructions or, you know, whatever else.
They're all disgusting manipulators. I mean, all of
them. They've proven this. But he just simply
wants you to pardon net, Netanyahu because
I think he feels that's gonna give him
some kind of cover. That's what I think.
But the point, that's not what Republicans think,
guys. It's just not.
It's just wild. And we live in an
interesting time
where the true nature as
is showing you
is being shown to you right now. Even
if it's sort of like an abstract, like,
black hole point where, you know, Trump's saying
that, but you're gonna stand back and go,
what? Like, what in what world would he
say that? You know he knows otherwise. Well,
here, in regard to the Board of Peace,
just to add in this in case you
forgot,
they've added
Israel
and Netanyahu. Israel to the Board of Peace
and Netanyahu on the board.
I mean,
to a group that they're currently genociding.
And as Sarah writes, it's like welcoming Hitler
to preside over the Nuremberg trials.
We have to see what this is showing
us, guys. Al Jazeera Arabic investigation reveals how
Israel's systematic use of intentionally prohibited thermal,
thermal, and thermobaric weapons have been supplied by
The United States, have left no trace
of nearly 3,000
Palestinians it killed during its genocidal war on
Gaza.
Thermildaric.
Thermal weapons.
Battle tested, we're hold we're told as they
sell them to the most despotic countries in
the world. The good guys. Right?
Well, here's what it looks like. This is
not a joke. It got barely any attention.
This is what Israel's doing to people intents.
So
as Sarah writes,
they didn't just kill human beings, they vaporize
them, making sure to leave nothing to bury
and nothing to prove they ever existed.
The Israeli army launched thermobaric and pressure bombs
supplied by The United States on Gaza. These
bombs, which burnt at a temperature of 3,500
degrees Celsius, are capable of killing thousands in
seconds, leaving no trace.
They've used chemical weapons. They've used white phosphorus.
They've used any number of examples, even arguments
of tactical nukes. And frankly, I think it's
likely even the Lebanon could discussion. Right? I
mean, these it's just insane where we are.
It really is. I can't get past that.
I mean, it's so clear, and this is
just ignored by the people in power because
of what we're highlighting today.
They know that this is something this goes
up outside our purview. We're not allowed to
get into this. They're not in control enough.
They're not in power enough to be able
to allow us to see it. They just
have to stand there and look like idiots.
We're, Oh, woah. You're lying. That's not true.
And they're about to go to jail. They
still can't do anything. If that even happens.
I'm kinda making a joke out of it.
But doesn't that feel like where we are?
We're all just kinda just standing there going,
well, let's move forward. Look at UK. Talk
Alex Jones, twenty twenty election, hoping that we
just stop paying attention to what we're actually
seeing right now. But the only thing the
one thing we're sure not getting is any
kind of accountability or action. They're not even
investigating. They're not doing anything.
That speaks for itself.
So here's what Israel is also doing while
while this is all happening. According to local
sources, well, Israeli settlers sprayed chemical pesticides on
crops in several areas of South Of Southern
Hebron, destroying Palestinian owned farmland on top of
everything else that's happening. The attack comes amid
a sharp rise in settler violence. So chemical
attacks as well. I I saw reports of,
like, of what I thought was interesting, I
wasn't able to actually verify it, of dumping
glyphosate,
which I'm thinking, like, for crying out loud,
like, they're doing that as, like, a weapon,
and here we are dumping in our own
food. You know?
We're all we're all being attacked, guys. Mondawise,
former Israeli defense this is from February 4.
Former Israeli defense minister. Israel's ideology of Jewish
supremacy
resembles Nazi race theory.
For those that always push back on the
terminology, I think it's always important to highlight
the fact that the leading Israeli human rights
group,
the leading Israeli human rights group, Beth Sellum,
the Israeli information center for human rights in
the occupied territory. It's Israeli. Not Palestinian. It's
Israeli.
2021.
A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid,
which is always why I point out that
it's not only that the Jewish element does
exist within the Zionist manipulation. There's a Christian
element too. There's an atheist element too. Herzl
himself was an atheist. The point is that
it is about Zionism,
which drives this kind of supremacist mindset, and
there's different variations. But it's not only Jewish
when you can see that there's Jewish groups
that call it all out. I mean, it
couldn't be more clear today. Sounds like it's
why I get frustrated with people that I
believe have good intentions, but somehow just refuse
to acknowledge that point. Like, it's just obvious
that it can't it's not all or nothing.
There's clearly different levels to this.
And truth
is that Israel's playing a central factor in
what we're dealing with, guys. It couldn't be
more clear to me. Now, I'm gonna end
with three clips here.
This one's, I think, just you know, I
I briefly pointed to these, but I'm gonna
play them on the way out here.
This is not a new clip. I believe
this is from 2025 if I remember correctly,
but
the point still comes across very well,
which is
this is while he was committing genocide, and
this is what your government does. And it
I love his point because he compares it
to, like, North Korea that we make fun
of. I think we as Americans, we really
need to have a kind of a not
I don't mean this in a religious sense,
but, you know, the come to Jesus meeting.
We need to sit down and be like,
okay, guys. We see it. We know we
do. Let's stop being children. Okay? We realize
that, you know, we all laugh. Oh, look
at the despotic Banana Republics and all that.
We are there, guys. That's where we are.
We need to stop looking through rose colored
glasses and pretending we live in somewhere we
don't. Our government is broken.
They they are absolutely selling you out to
anybody out there, in my opinion. The highest
bidder that benefits themselves. Maybe at one point
it was different, but people have gravitated for
power and control in this government.
You know I believe in fighting to change
that. That's why I do this. But we
need to be real about where we are
first, guys. And it's the Epstein thing back
to the original point that just it just
kinda cracked open that door. And I think
that's caused a lot of uncomfortable positions right
now. So first this clip,
it speaks for itself.
Mister speaker the
prime minister of the state of Israel.
This is Netanyahu
from Congress.
Right. So
he comes in. They're all clapping,
all shaking his head, and I'm gonna fast
forward to when he gets to the podium.
Which, by the way, is probably, like, two
minutes,
really, for clapping before he gets to the
podium. Okay. So it takes him about two
minutes to get to the podium.
He's reached the podium.
They're clapping.
Sit back and watch.
Relax and watch this.
This is America.
And people make fun of North Korea. You
know those videos of North Koreans and they're
all clapping?
It's time to
hold up a mirror and look at yourself.
We've been with the couple who played this.
Right? And we I think the one we
played a while ago, like, year there was
a timer on the screen. Remember that? And
it's it's wild. It just it goes on
forever. They just keep clapping, and they get
surges of
applause.
It's
not
gonna
end
soon either. It's
gonna stay going.
Even Netanyahu
is
taken back by it. Yeah. Look at him.
And later on, he seems pissed off almost.
The congress members
are basically
ejaculating
at the sight of them.
Gonna have to clean up the place afterwards.
Yes. Members of congress, I now have the
high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to
you his excellency
Benjamin Netanyahu,
prime minister of Israel.
Oh, we log in.
Oh my god. America.
I don't even mean, like, necessarily, like, book
smart. You know what I mean? Like, it's
just it's just
unreal.
That makes me really sad. Like, I hate
watching that video. It's just it's something dark.
It just shows you, well, long ago, you
know? Like, these people are just can't it's
it's like they're watching Elvis. And I don't
know whether that's because they want you to
feel that way or whatever, but this is
while they've already been ruled to be guilty
of genocide.
You know what I mean? And it's like
you would expect some of them to be,
like, the whole damn thing, all of them.
You know what I mean? Like, it's just
these some of these points just really end
up showing you where we are.
Just mind blowing. Now the next one you've
seen, I believe I've shared a part of
it, maybe not. It's a clip from the
Sean Ryan show, surprisingly. But, of course, as
I keep seeing, whether it's Tim Poole, Bet
David, all the rest of the ones that
have been, like, just so hardcore trying to
gaslight you to support Trump, ignore the Epstein
files, are now suddenly like, okay. Well, it's
pretty
bad because, you know, the Wexner and the
redaction, oh, that one thing, that's the one
that's bad. You mean, aside from all the
things well before that that prove the same
points, they're just a bunch of ridiculous people.
They know they can't keep gaslighting you because
it's too far. It's too obvious. It's not
going away. So now they have to kinda
come around and go, well, okay.
You know? And and then they'll take the
first opportunity, in my opinion, to push you
right back in. Sean Ryan, CIA Sean Ryan,
I mean, that's I believe that's where that
these people are not on your side. They
are not here to inform you. I think
he's already proven that many times over. So
that's all to say that these people, if
they wanna maintain some level of influence going
forward, have to start giving you a bone,
have to start letting some steam out, and
that's what this represents. But what you're gonna
get is typically something that's just narrative even
with even like this. I find this to
be important. I think it's well put together,
but it's just narrative. And whoever did the
clip clearly put the things on there, but
that's not what Sean Ryan did as far
as I can tell. And it's about just
trying to get it out there so you
can always point back like Alex and go
see. Remember that that thing six years ago
when I said I think Trump was the
antichrist, which he said, by the way, that
it went back to support him the next
day? That because all I knew it, I
saw, oh, I was right. I'm always right.
That's how that works. But in this case,
this is a person breaking down how Israel
very much in every way
is taking everything from this country while that
we, the Americans, get nothing. And it shows
you who's calling the shots is the argument.
Who do you think we're occupied by? AIPAC.
We send
$18,000,000,000
a year to Israel. Why? What do we
get out of it?
Nothing. We get nothing.
Are we doing humanitarian work? No. They're charged
with genocide.
They're killing off Palestinians.
Are we helping them survive?
Well, they've got a higher standard of living
than we do, a longer lifespan than we
do, free education, free housing,
free health
care or we're sending them money.
Why? Ask
yourself why a US congressman can wear an
Israeli military uniform in congressional chambers.
I would think that would be an act
of treason.
Ask why the Israeli prime minister can bypass
the president,
fly directly in and speak to our Congress
without
any other government interaction.
Our congress gave Netanyahu,
a foreign prime minister,
26 standing ovations.
And don't forget, the one that Bannon was
trying to act like showed that Trump didn't
like
Netanyahu.
Netanyahu was able to, like, come around the
back door and enter some employee level of
the White House.
I mean, good luck trying to convince anybody
who's on a moron that that gives you
anything other than special access in one of
the most secured places in the country. You
know what I mean? This that's that's that
is the clip from from Wilkerson telling you
that they control a Pentagon.
It's all there. It's always been there.
I have
difficulty looking at that any other way than
we're occupied.
Statistically
speaking,
we have shown that whoever spends the more
money on an election wins 94% of the
time. Whoever spent the most wins.
We can also show
that every time somebody
spoke
out against
Israel
or AIPAC,
the next election,
their challenger was highly funded
and wins. The facts are all there.
All you have to do is look at
them. What that alone leads to, even if
it's not nefarious, it leads to a situation
where the only people who are represented in
our government are people that are pro Israel.
That alone should be enough for us to
be concerned. Right? But that alone, even if
I never even mentioned the word Jewish, becomes
a racist point. Even though I'm talking about
a government who's using lobbying money to influence
policy.
You know, it's just this again, I don't
even need to make these points anymore. I'm
of the mind that you guys have all
you guys have been getting these points for
years. It's not about racism. It's about the
government using racism to hide its crimes. Whenever
we try to talk about it, you get
told, well, that's anti Semitic. Mhmm.
No. It's not.
Calling things the way they are is not
anti Semitic.
Now,
here's this one just quickly. It's unquestionable that
the Epstein
business was
heavily influenced, let me put it that way,
by Mossad.
And so that's
somehow emblematic on these huge geopolitical issues?
Yes. I I watched
Mossad take over the Pentagon
in 2002.
The Pentagon was infiltrated
by Mossad.
They did not need any identification to get
through the rumor entrance to the building. Doesn't
that sound familiar?
Doesn't that sound familiar? It's what just happened
with Trump, apparently, but Bannon's like, oh, he
was super embarrassed by it or whatever. I
didn't watch his full segment. I just saw
the clip. But still, you know, the idea
that you ever tried to make that argument,
it shows you something very particular, you know,
from somebody who happens to be very, you
know, in a very
cited on the Epstein files many, many, many
times having discussions with Epstein
you know, let's let's trust Bannon and then
the objective conversation of Epstein. Went upstairs to
Douglas Fife, the undersecretary of defenses
for policy, the third most powerful man in
the defense department. Occasionally, they went to the
second most powerful man, Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy
secretary of defense. And they had run to
the Pentagon. Donald Rumsfeld, the secretary of defense
said to my boss one time, hell, I
don't run my building.
Mossad does.
So,
lastly,
this clip again
for original Vox, ran ran ran Paul
to a befuddled looking Tim Pool for obvious
reasons today, I think. But just the simple
point of Ron Paul telling you, you know,
that this this was a coup. And this
was an older video. This is from years
ago. It's not from right now.
Just recognize, guys, that it's always been that
clear, and it's not about racism.
We're there. We're dealing with this. It's changing.
But there's an a desperate effort from very
powerful and very wealthy people to just put
this to bed. I guess that's up to
you to decide.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question everything. Come to your
own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. You know, there's been a coup
that take a we don't have any resemblance,
to a government that believes in a republic.
We don't have honest money. We don't have
integrity. We don't even have people in Washington
that even pretends,
you know, that you're supposed to tell the
truth. But I do believe there has been
a coup, and it's been taken over. And
if I want to if I can, I
wanna just put the date in my mind,
and you anybody could pick probably any date
in the last hundred year? But I picked,
I have picked November twenty second nineteen sixty
three. What happened on that day? That was
the day Kennedy was murdered by our government
Wow. You know, by the CIA.