Remember the swine flu scare of 1976?
That was the year the US government told
us all that swine flu could turn out
to be a killer that could spread across
the nation. And Washington decided that every man,
woman, and child in the nation should get
a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a
pandemic.
Doctor David Sensor, then head of the CDC,
the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, is
now in private industry.
He devised this wine flu program, and he
pushed it.
You began to give flu shots to the
American people in October '76. October 1. By
that time, how many cases of swine flu
around the world had been reported? There had
been,
several reported, but none confirmed.
Where did this so called deadly variety of
flu, where did it first hit back in
1976?
It began right here at Fort Dix in
New Jersey in January
when a number of recruits
began to complain of respiratory ailments, something like
the common cold.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Saturday, 02/07/2026.
Thank you for joining me today. Gonna be
a shorter show today. I'm focusing on on
one main topic. I'm gonna give you some
updates on a couple of Epstein things on
the latter half of the show, but I
wanna start with something that I've I've Orwell's
been sharing some stuff with me around the,
a couple of different stories that I've been
keeping off to the side around the BioLab
conversation,
one that she sent me around Fort Detrick
that I wanna discuss today. But just the
the interesting connection to this story
to the last story
that I know is in the reporting, but
I find that hard I don't see that
being represented. So the in Las Vegas, if
you haven't seen the story, there was another
one of these bio labs
as and I I put it in quotes
for a reason. We'll get into that. In
California, I believe it was Reedley, California, there
was an example
of that happening, was a year and a
half ago or so in regard to the
the the biolab
owned by a Chinese national that was supposed
to be some kind of a, you know,
COVID nineteen origin point kind of a discussion.
And we should very much be considering that,
except for the fact that it was I
mean, there was a lot. I don't wanna
go all the way through that last story.
We'll go into it. We're gonna cover the
connection to this one. But remember, we're talking
about a building that was using utilities.
There was a hose coming out of the
side of the stucco wall. Like, it's very
clear that somebody was aware of what was
going on if there was you know, especially
since there was resources being used, water, refrigeration.
And yet we still, to this very day,
don't really have much information.
And still, to this very day, don't even
know what they supposedly found out those things
were if they ever tested them to begin
with. And you can check that for yourself.
The the whole thing was the worry in
the hazmat was for the concern because the
label said Ebola, COVID, and whatever else it
said. And they said, we're gonna be testing.
We sent hundreds to the lab. And to
this very day, if you look into the
research and ask anything you want, it'll tell
you that ultimately, right now, we've never gotten
any more information about what those were.
As to how do we know they were
even tested? How do we know you know?
So we should be questioning that story. My
point was, at that point of the story,
we covered this as we should be considering
this could be some China something. It could
be somebody using Chinese nationals to cover what
they were doing. It could be something our
government's doing. All of these are very possible.
But as usual, the partisan media tried to
make it what they wanted for what suited
their interests now
then, I mean. And now today, we have
another story around Las Vegas.
So again, these are important stories that we
shouldn't dismiss, especially,
you know, if partisans covering it, it shouldn't
be something we reflexively dismiss. We should go
into these. We should research them. And as
I'm going through this, one part that wasn't
really included in most of the coverage, even
though it is represented in many mainstream articles,
is that this person we're gonna get into
had a French passport and an Israeli passport
and a Israeli citizen. And yet the discussion's
about a Chinese national who owns this. There
is a Chinese connection to this. But so
I wanna discuss this with an objective view
and think about what this could be.
And and we're gonna get into the where
and where this went down in this location
and the fact that this one is connected
to the one in California.
And and a simultaneous
story that may or may not be connected,
but I find it relevant with the topic
where Fort Detrick is dealing with they're investigating,
so we're being told, essentially, sabotage,
holes being cut in their suits. And this
is BSO four. This is Ebola, COVID, some
of the work you know, whatever they aside
from the concern you know, the questioning about
what that is, if it's even there, and
I'm right there with you, the point is
what they're framing it as the worst of
the worst. Right? And they say they're working
on these terrible things.
And remember, going back before that, Fort Detrick
is is the is the
the lab that is notorious
for leaks.
Or, again, you know, whether that's a cover
story or a manufacturer, the point is the
the story is that these are things that
they told you, that Fort Detrick is notorious
for having mistakes for leak. This the one
I reference all the time, and this is
reporting from the government. I believe it was
one I see. I'm gonna misquote it. It's
been a while since I've looked it up.
But the point was they had
frequently recurring mistakes. And I mean mistakes like
and this is one example. Having a sample
go out on the bottom of your shoe
or having dangerous things put in the garbage
can. And we're talking about high level, pandemic
level stuff. And it and this is it's
just crazy that's even a circumstance we allow.
That went on forever. And, again, it was
something like three things every seven,
every year for seven years. Like, this non
it just was continual.
And so the problem is that that opens
a door for, you know, oopsie mistakes where
things can get out or
the usable circumstance to rationalize whatever an agenda
is or whatever you wanna look at it
as.
And that was the place that had a
leak and a mistake and an issue right
before whatever we call COVID nineteen.
You know, however you wanna look at that.
Because I consider that that itself was sort
of, you know, a place that it was
an excuse, a manufactured
narrative to justify what we're talking about. But
you could just as easily look at that
and say they're just clumsy, and they made
a mistake. And this got out, and they're
trying to cover it up. You know, Occam's
razor, that's more likely. Right?
But so for today's conversation around this other
one, I find it interesting the partisan media
is making about a Chinese national. And then
once the Israeli part came out, so I
said the story doesn't exist anymore. Reminds me
of the guy who was crossing the border
around the Gaza immigration overlap, and they said,
oh my god. It's a Palestinian trying to
break through the border. And he said, you'll
know my name when you find out. Remember
that guy? Turned out that guy was work
he's somebody who was working for Mossad. He
was a Jordanian national. I covered this. We
proved that on the show, and weird how
that just no longer mattered anymore. This is
what we get from partisan media. But the
point of this today is that it's important
to see how it could connect to a
lot of things. I mean, even if you
wanna stand back and consider that there's a
interconnection between all three of these nations. You
know? So let's go into this information, and
I think it's important for us
to think about how it ties into the
larger conversation of what's going on in the
world. Two ways to look at it or
possible, you
know, considerations.
You know, you have an estate right now
as an Israeli citizen who's involved
that's floundering, that is falling apart, people are
seeing through it, and just simply creating chaotic
situations enough would make sense to me. But
then you have the overlap of the joint
agenda, the global direction that Trump is very
much involved with, if not building, and what
these kind of events
help
create. It's worth thinking about all this stuff.
So I wanna start actually I think I
was actually gonna open with,
the I I ended up going with the
Fort Detrick clip, but just since I have
this in here, I think it's kinda funny.
I'll start with this. Just a quick shout
out to Truthstream Media because I'm a big
fan of their work, always have been.
And they're technically part of the IMA. Here
is a post that came out from Twitter,
say from the creator's account.
You thought the fun was over this weekend?
Video take, video takes the center stage in
your timeline. We're giving away millions and hundreds
of thousands if you create a video
basically using rock and AI and so on.
Like, really just trying to drive people into
this. Right? And you could think it's benign
or not. I just did the the joke
meme of this is fine. And then, TrueStreetMedia
posted this underneath this just, you know, to
con you know, I guess, to she'll put
it in front of me. And I this
is what she posted. Here's our last minute
entry for the Grok Imagine commercial contest. I
just love this. Like, I I I tweeted
this out elsewhere and said, look, if you're
not following true street media, you should be
following true street media. It just kills me.
And so I wanna play this really quickly
because this is supposed to be like a
promotion of grok. And this is what you
get from the nonpartisan objective independent media.
Breaking news. An incident is unfolding. This is
a mistake. A number of leading CEOs were
arrested at a party after the newest file
released. The sixteenth amendment has finally been repealed.
This is closed forever.
Experiments to dim the sun were ruled a
crime against humanity.
After a century,
the country can finally return to sound money.
What?
We have rights.
I just love that. You know, obviously, not
what they're looking for. Right? Shout out to
TrueStreet Media. Now let's get right into the
main point here, and I wanna start with
something that I think is,
you know,
I I feel it's building a narrative. I'm
hesitating hesitating only because I don't wanna frame
I don't know this person's intention. I don't
know what their mind is behind this. This
could be something that they genuinely believe is
in our interest, and who knows? Maybe people
believe it is. Maybe it actually can be
even with the concerns.
That's not where my mind's at. But we're
talking about mRNA and the use of mRNA
now, like, not in the context of before
even though that was the way they were
framing it then, but being brought back up
as sort of like, hey. We need to
get back into mRNA even though we never
stopped with that. I'm gonna make that point
for the thousandth time. It seems like nobody
knows that. They did not stop with mRNA,
guys. They're still making shots, COVID included.
But the the argument is because they defunded
mRNA even though that didn't happen, like USAID.
These are just crazy topics we deal with
that because of that, that now we can't
defend ourselves.
Now this is a pretty highly respected,
like, national security, you know, multiple factor, type
of blog called War on the Rocks.
Now, you know, question it like anything. I'm
not very familiar with it, but just looking
into it, it seems like it's got a
pretty high reputation around these kind of conversations.
And so I did think this was pretty
interesting. And it is making a pretty you
know, a a case that you might find,
valid or or or logical
if the argument is that, one,
people around the world are rapidly building these
things for the sake of using them against
everybody else, which is not that crazy. In
fact, I think we know our governments are
doing that. And on top of that and
then two, the question of whether or not
this is you know, can effectively be used
to fight against whatever they claim that is.
And I guess three would be whether or
not this is ever something we should you
know, the the door being opened into this
realm. This is game of function, guys. This
is what's so frustrating about it, and this
is something that never stopped.
So this is gonna be discuss that argument
about why we should be leaning back in,
then we're gonna get into the current situations
and how interesting I think the connection is.
Whether or not there this is some planned
overlap,
the idea that this is being made and
now we have these incidents popping up that
are pointed to as this is why we
need to. Look. China is trying to do
things to us. We need mRNA to defend
ourselves. That's not a lone argument from this
platform, but this is the argument being made.
Defending against the next bioweapon, the mRNA imperative.
Jeff Koehler is the person's name. Again, the
look the person up in the platform. You'll
find this pretty widely regarded.
And,
01/28/2026.
That's why the highlight is gone, so let's
go to this.
So it says it should be said upfront
that as cofounder of Tivard Biosciences, a company
developing
tRNA,
helper molecule that carries the the right building
blocks to the cell's protein making machinery. There's
all sorts of different elements to this. We've
talked about tRNA. We've talked about siRNA. We've
talked about,
SARNA. I mean, these are all different variations
in the same technological direction, each with their
very different use and and, I guess, outcome,
but all within the same concerning direction of
where this goes. Right? I mean, understand RNA
is something different than mRNA. These are things
that naturally occur versus, you know, I mean,
even further, which is interesting. And so with
mRNA is the same point, but the mod
RNA. And so this you know, one quick
side point.
This is why it's so frustrating
when we get into the we talk about
this often in other shows. The meaning of
words. If we get to a point, like,
right now where we can't even agree on,
like, the basic meaning of words, how is
we can't have a conversation. So when we
refer to mRNA, what we're really talking about
right now is mod RNA. That's what it
is in everything they're using. It is, what
is it, n one n one methylsutouridine
modified RNA, if I remember off the top
of my head. At least that's what was
in the COVID shots. I might have mispronounced
one of those incorrectly. The point is that
this is modified. It's not organic. This is
genetically engineered.
This is GMO food stuff. I mean, it's
the same kind of direction, the same kind
of people. This is what they're doing in
a very broad sense. And so it worries
me that this is even continuing and happening.
But back to the article, I just wanna
make that point about how we can't even
agree on what we're dealing with. But he's
simply saying you should be upfront that he's
associated with this. Right? So he's got interest
in this direction, which is fair to say,
but I clearly think that matters. Right?
It says, there,
tRNA based therapeutics for genetic diseases.
I have a commercial stake in the broader
RNA medicines field. And remember that Cymbdi can
be working on these to help people with
genetic diseases with the best of intentions, and
maybe they actually can. It's sort of like
the Neuralink discussion. Yes. Very well very likely,
this if it works the way they claim,
this could help a lot of people, but
that's not the only consideration in the conversation.
Hypothetically, if it was something that would make
everyone's arms work again but then kill off
the population, it's like,
maybe that's not a good trade off. I'm
being obviously facetious, but realize that these things
with what we just dealt with,
it's obvious that there's a risk there. Not
that it's everything under the sun in this,
but clearly, we just saw what this is
capable of. So we should not be allowing
them to go, look, it'll help in this
point. So ignore all the risks, which is
how governments tend to operate here.
Continuing, it says,
I also cofounded the Alliance for MRA Medicines,
a nonprofit organization advancing MRA technology. So clearly,
he's interested in this direction, and it it
promotes it. My perspective, however, is based on
three decades of research in RNA biology, including
work in my laboratory,
that contributed to the design of Spikevax,
Moderna's COVID nineteen vaccine. Right? And that's also
the that's the Bob Langer. He was the
scientific cofounder from Moderna. And this overlaps with
all the same stuff we're always talking about
back to from optogenetics and not not necessarily
in the shot, but the work they're working
on and how all this kind of comes
together in a lot of different ways that
we've painted over the years. But just recognizing
that the COVID nineteen Moderna shot is one
of the central problems in this entire conversation
when he was involved with designing that and
is still promoting it. That just that speaks
volumes to me. But it says, and direct
experience with the public private coordination that made
Operation Warp Speed possible
To maintain this advantage
so right there. Advantage.
Are you of the mind that Operation Warp
Speed and COVID nineteen shots were an advantage
to the American people? I disagree. I think
you do too. To maintain this advantage, Congress
should restore recently cut mRNA research funding,
and the Pentagon should establish mRNA biodefense manufacturing
as a priority before America's adversaries close the
gap. It's the same AI conversation. We gotta
do it before they do. Who cares about
the risks because they're gonna get there first?
That's an insane mindset that drive people drives
the world on the precipice of destruction. Right?
So here,
we have a point where he's saying we
need
to re, re, renew the cut funding.
All they're referring to, guys, is the $500,000,000
contract. That's what everybody points to. You can
right now show that there's more than that
invested in mRNA all over the map. I'll
get into the examples I often show, the
many different provable things we can show you
that are major million dollar projects that are
continuing. And it's not just about shots. You
have to remember this. They they they mentioned
that too. MRNA and other fields are gonna
continue. Food, whatever else. And these are real
things that are happening.
So understand that they want you to restore
that as if that's the only thing that
matters. So I question the intention here because
of that, because he must know that there's
more than that going on. He's he's researching
it. He's working on it. You think he
doesn't know about the other mRNA projects? So
you could argue that he believed that this
one piece of funding was just that important,
and that could be the case. But I
question whether or not it's about framing it
as it's not happening even though it is,
which is why we need to bring it
back even though it never stopped. He goes
on to say, and the Pentagon should establish
mRNA biodefense manufacturing as a priority. And this
is just, again, because they're gonna do it
over there. I don't disagree with
other bad entities like Israel and others working
on exactly that problem,
but it matters to me that that is
that proof? I mean, are are do you
know of that, or is that just a
I don't know. It could be happening. I
find that to be very relevant.
Just the possibility
of maybe something happening is not enough for
me to do something to agree to something
I believe is bad and dangerous.
But hypothetically, if we could go, but look,
they're literally building a weapon right there.
Okay. Would the answer be
do the same thing?
Now let's be clear again. We're talking about
mRNA defense. If you already understand that if
it's if the mRNA like this can be
used for defense or offense, what is that
called, ladies and gentlemen? That's called dual use
technology, and that is the gain of function
conversation.
But what we're talking about here is that
well, back to what I was saying, actually,
is that the point is
if they're building a weapon,
you might wanna be like, okay. Well, that's
a lot. I don't like it, but it
could help us defend against that. So first,
again, is it do you wanna lean into
that just because of that and create or
or, secondarily, is that even the right response?
Why would you wanna make something you know,
why wouldn't you go after them and stop
them from building the bomb? I'm not advocating
that. I'm just showing that there are other
more logical directions than let's also work on
the same alarmingly dangerous thing to stop them
from their alarmingly dangerous thing. You just you
know, it's like the idea of nuclear weapons.
Think of it like that. Okay. Yeah. You
can have one. They fire one. You have
one too. Okay. Then we all die. You
know? It doesn't make sense with the way
that you really break it down. It's but
it's really about getting us to agree to
it. That's what I believe.
Now it goes on to say, what once
required advanced national laboratories,
designing dangerous pathogens or engineering novel biological agents
can now be done with modest time and
resources.
Adversaries can design and deploy engineering threats in
weeks, while traditional countermeasures can still take years
to develop. Well, gee, where did that technology
come from? Why why does the guy over
there in the cave in the middle of
nowhere have that techno? Oh, that's right. Because
you guys created it. You see how this
works? Now if you believe that what he's
saying is these random nobodies over there were
able to make this in that small that's
not true.
What they're doing is standing on the shoulders
of people like this that make it. I
mean, you could look at it like they're
stealing it or they're they're giving into it
secretly. My mind is that people like this,
often with the best of intentions, make these
things,
and then don't understand
that people they're working with are very dangerous
and evil people. Or maybe you could argue
it's all the same conversation, but if you
understand groups like the governments we're working with
or the higher level technocrats we're dealing with,
you think they're not gonna work with these
other they are working with the people committing
genocide. They are doing this in the world.
So it just it's
worrisome
that we can't see how obvious that is.
And it says,
the widening gap between the speed of potential
attackers and the sluggishness of America's defenses is
one of the most urgent national security challenges
of our generation. I mean, really, that is
the need to make this mRNA defense as
you frame it because of what they're building
that I don't think we can truly demonstrate
is actually happening even though I don't doubt
it is the most challenging security? Really? What
about any number of, like, borderline
World War three circum I mean, you see
what I see? It's this is, in their
minds, the end all be all, and I
don't you could argue from their perspective they
might see it that way. What I'm trying
to get at is that I feel like
this is building this for clear, you know,
to get us in a certain mindset for
what's coming. And it goes on. That gap
continues to widen with each new technological advance.
Researchers recently created the first AI designed viruses.
Yeah. Well, we all talked about this. This
this is I mean, I I even had
an interview with George Webb about that way
back when in regard to the idea of
where the COVID nineteen situation was gonna be
going into AI designed vaccines and virus and
everything else. And, again, do you think that
they built AI and that no. This is
from people like Musk and the rest who
are building these things, and then it gets
used. And they can go, oh, now we
have to do more because they can use
it too.
Maybe we should've just not let this happen
in the first place. No. No. It's it's
kind of a naive statement seeing as how
you can prove other governments are doing it
even though we might not, but it's still
the right mindset to look at it. You
know, doing the wrong thing because they are,
I always point that out, is not the
correct path. These experiments were carried out under
strict safeguards for the benefit for beneficial purposes.
Well, that's a very generous way to frame
what's going on. The underlying methods training generative
models on viral genomics are becoming increasingly sophisticated
and not limited to safe applications. Well, who
are we talking about?
That's you guys doing that. Like, I don't
mean I shouldn't the mainstream.
That is The US, Israel, UK. That these
are the groups who are working on these
next generation applications.
So it's interesting that, yes, we're all concerned
about that. But as you highlight the concern
that you guys are building, you're using that
to argue that that's why we need to
make defense because that's possible. Well, it's possible
because you're building it. What now requires a
sophisticated team of researchers will become accessible to
smaller actors. Same argument.
If the threat landscape is accelerating, our biodefense
strategy should accelerate even faster. Why is that
logic to anybody?
So we need to go as fast as
possible in a certain in a dangerous situation
because you claim the threat is accelerating, even
if it is.
The argument and this is like with the
COVID argument. We need to go as fast
as we possibly can. Well, gee, I can
point out a 100,000, quote, mistakes that took
place during that rush period
because you guys
told us you had to hurry.
But we all, I hope, know by now
that that wasn't an accident. Clearly,
many of it much of that was by
design. But I just wanna argue even if
it wasn't, this is the same argument, that
we need to hurry up and accelerate even
faster into a direction that is unprecedented
and chaotic and full of possible side effects
and issues. But hurry, hurry, hurry because they're
doing it first. Doesn't that seem like what
our government does with everything right now? During
COVID nineteen, researchers quickly obtained the viral genomic
genetic sequence, which, again, I mean, for crying
out loud, I bet you I even have
that video still on here.
Let me look real quick. I mean, the
the this is the the the same things
we talked about over and over. And what's
interesting is right now, what I keep highlighting
is this weird situation.
It's not it's not abnormal. It's been around
forever, but more than I've seen where
there'll be just the you know, this is
an obvious thing, and then everyone just names
it something else and just lies right to
your face. So in this case, we have
even China claiming
that they did not,
sequence the virus.
Right here.
Isolate.
Now you could argue they're lying, of course.
But remember, this is backed up by numerous
this comes down to when you get into
it, the point of,
Koch's postulates and the reality of whether they
even met that, and you could prove they
never have. I mean, you could people disagree,
but I've gone if you go right down
the line, it just comes to a will.
We're talking about semantics. Okay. Fine. But you
still didn't do explicitly what that last step
requires.
Hold on to the conversation. We're not gonna
bear get into it now. We've had it
many times. But here is what China said.
And why has the data not been shared?
No. They didn't isolate as a virus.
That's the issue.
He's saying they didn't isolate it, and that's
the issue. That's from the beginning. Now if
you understand and I can go back through
all of this. I have it all saved
from the Moderna timeline that they posted, then
deleted, but I still have saved an archive
that shows you what their timeline was and
how quickly it went from China saying, here's
the thing, to them having something put putting
in people's arms.
Very I mean, if I remember correctly, we're
talking months here before they had the sequence
they claimed was ready, and that's the same
sequence they used all the way till they
started shifting into the shots.
So the point is, if China's going, well,
we never isolated the virus and you're using
the sequence they pointed to, you can prove
that wasn't the case even if they later
did it. It's not hard to understand, but
this has become such you know, people run
from these conversations because
you're it's there's so many large,
confident names out there yelling you down who
rightly or,
obviously have more scientific research and knowledge and
education.
Well, then I then then you listen to
what they have to say, but understand how
easy it is to prove the timeline and
the reality of when they claim it even
happened was after the fact that they made
the Moderna sequence. I mean, it's just basic
understanding here, guys, but this is what, you
know, gets buried under screaming people out there.
But so during COVID nineteen, they quickly obtained
the viral genetic sequence, providing everything needed to
begin developing an mRNA vaccine.
Apparently, it took a couple days. Right? The
vaccine was also designed quickly, even though it
would still take clinical trials involving tens of
thousands of patients to prove its safety and
efficacy, which didn't happen. Then we could talk
about Brooke Jackson. We could talk about any
number of things in regard to the so
called trials, what a couple of rats and
all these different examples we could point out,
but here he is saying that. Now it's
possible too that he just still, still, still
doesn't know that or doesn't care or doesn't
believe it. That's crazy to me. But we
you know, these are this isn't even the
point, really. It's just interesting the framing of
the h perspective of before. Close coordination between
the government and private sector under president Trump's
leadership made the unthinkable possible.
Okay. So he's pro Trump, apparently. But the
point here is that it's about we need
Trump to do this again. So maybe he's
not, and he just wants to stroke his
ego and go, please bring back the mRNA
that never actually stopped. But at least now
start claiming out loud that we're gonna lean
into it. The same technology that enabled a
rapid response during the pandemic can be decisive
against engineered threats.
Can it?
Are are we of the mind that they
prove the efficacy and and,
blanking on the word that, you know, the
the I mean, efficacy works. But, you know,
are you are we of the mind that
they prove that these things actually function the
way they claim they did?
Really?
I mean, in my mind, not just the
mRNA technology, the platform itself, like, the whole
damn thing was shown to be rife with
mistakes, if that was mistakes,
or if they were, or just completely, like,
the the the I mean, god, I don't
wanna get pulled into the re going over
the entire COVID conversation again just because I
wanna make make this not as long as
it needs to be. But realize that this
is I mean, these are basic things that
people broke down, myself included, during this entire
conversation.
This didn't work.
What they did hurt people, and it's not
that it hurt people in addition to doing
what it was supposed to. If you understand
the the the the information, the the statistics
that they released, it was
the benefits did not outweigh the risk. It
did not, in many cases, even function the
way that they claimed it did. In fact,
it just killed people.
But here we are, that we can use
it to fight back. You know? Even if
it ends up fighting back against something, there
are going to be problems with all this.
Now it goes forward saying, unlike your original
vaccines dedicated to specific pathogens,
mRNA manufacturing,
it's,
sorry. The word is not being it's fuzzy
for some reason. Here, let me just do
this.
It's only one word, but unlike traditional vaccines
dedicated to specific pathogens, mRNA manufacturers
it didn't say pivots. I thought it looked
different. It says,
mRNA manufacturing,
unlike traditional vaccines dedicated to specific pathogens, mRNA
manufacturing pivots rapidly between new countermeasures by changing
only the RNA sequence. Well, we saw how
that worked, guys.
We kinda went Omicron and all the different
games that were played and all the, oh,
don't worry. All we gotta do is pump
in the new thing. And then guess what?
It killed people. And guess what? People got
immune systems collapsing and and all sorts of
cancers. And, yeah. But it works, though.
I guess the thing that was likely a
flu that wasn't gonna hurt people, but, you
know, you guys know all of this. But
up like updating software while keeping its hardware
constant. Right back to the plug and play
dynamic that they really didn't want you to
see after it became too weird for everybody.
Advances in miniaturization are moving toward deployable systems,
able to operate in forward paces or even
battlefield conditions. Funny how they use the word
miniaturization.
It's I'm trying to think of a funny
example. That's like that's like saying, you know,
talking about, you know, I can't even think
of a good one, but we're talking about
nanotechnology here, guys. We're talking about microscopic it's
just like calling it a bunch of midgets.
So if everyone calls We're talking about in
microscopic things, and he calls it miniaturization.
I personally find that
an effort to try to hide from what
that is.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm reading into it
what I want. But my god, advances in
miniaturization makes me think of,
what's that movie called? I'm just I my
mind the word takes me to it it's
the inner space, you know, the shrinking of
the thing and going in the body. The
we're talking about obvious technology that's been around
for a long time. And, you know, the
lipid nanoparticles are part of that as well.
Moving toward deployable systems?
Really? Moving toward
decades ago? I mean, anyway, this is weird
the way this is being framed. But it
says, yet just as the mRNA capability becomes
essential to its expansion critical, The United States
is retreating from it.
Hardly.
I'll prove that to you in a second
that that's not true. In August, the US
Department of Health and Human Services discontinued approximately
500,000,000.
That's it. That's not I shouldn't say it's
a small amount, but realize that was a
contract that'd been there. There's plenty more contracts.
They and on top of that, what I
proved to you was the 500,000,000,
half I mean, I don't wanna say half,
a good chunk of it were contracts that
were already coming to an end. So they
just said, we're ending them right away, and
it was already coming to an end, many
of which were from the Biden administration forward
and overlapping from even before from Trump's administration.
The point is many of them didn't even
end. I went over this recently. So they
say this, they point to a bunch of
it, and a lot of these things didn't
even actually end. On top of that, they
started and continued plenty of others.
It's just a dis it's a straight dishonesty.
The decision said they'd show through the biotechnology
sector. That's why they want you to free
this. Right? Like, everyone's so up in arms
because Trump did what he promised.
Did he? Seems like a pretty self serving
narrative that's framed as fighting the other side.
Right?
But it goes it says, defense funding alone
cannot fill this gap. Biodefense programs funded through
the US Department of Defense are mission specific
and threat focused.
Restoring this capability requires two complementary actions. First,
Congress should restore the 500,000,000
in lost mRNA research funding.
This would not only help rebuild the civilian
research base, but send a strong message from
Capitol Hill that policymakers understand the strategic value
of mRNA technology.
Second, the Department of Defense should establish a
dedicated biodefense manufacturing initiative. See? So not only
we're go to to not just start it
again, but literally turn the machine into an
mRNA factory. No US military machine, which is
kinda what it already was, you know, aiming
at.
The Department of Defense should establish a dedicated
biodefense manufacturing initiative. The Department of Defense's BioMaid
program
supports bio industrial manufacturing,
fuels, textiles, chemicals, but mRNA countermeasures require fundamentally
different infrastructure. So what he's saying, we need
a mRNA
focused entity. No current Department of Defense program
provides this capability.
Neither action alone is sufficient, but both are
necessary to maintain American leadership
in mRNA innovation. Oh, wait. I thought it
was about protecting ourselves
and keeping safe from evil boogeymen.
Oh, but I guess it was really about
maintaining
preeminence of the American state. Right? American leadership
and mRNA innovation, which is very different than
defending yourself against bad guys in the world.
And,
he writes, the integrated capability to the public
and private sectors, you know, public private like
World Economic Forum, it's not a secret, demonstrated
under president Trump's past leadership. Right. The public
private partnership that the Republicans
were all fighting when it was Biden, but
now it's great because Trump's winning. It's the
same damn thing. I mean, what's so crazy,
it's not even the same globalist thing it
is, but it's not even just that. It's
not even just the same Davos overlap. It's
not even I mean, it's all of it.
It's the same COVID nineteen discussion. It's the
same vaccine conversation. The only difference is you
just name it something else. You call it
something else. Just like, well, it's not gain
function. It's EPBB. It's the same thing.
Except in this case, it's not the different
name for the thing. It's going it's just
we're not doing that.
You can't see it anymore. And then it
keep going. That's how stupid it feels to
me. It's very obvious this isn't stopping.
So on that, and really quickly since I
was pointing to and we'll come back to
it,
I'll get I mean, there's tons of these,
and I I should grab this one too.
This is the one that always makes me
laugh is that you can quite literally look
up the 2026
Comernity shot,
The literal Comernity COVID nineteen shot, and it's
being given right now. They this this was
put out 08/27/2025.
Trump's administration.
After they said they were ending mRNA. 2025,
2026, COVID nineteen shot. SARS CoV-two.
It's like it's it's like we're speaking to
a wall. How is it possible that in
a conversation of full of people claiming they're
in the media, that people don't know that
they're still building mRNA shots?
There it is. Pfizer. Oh, don't forget. Trump's
partnered with Pfizer now. And that's totally great,
I guess.
Doesn't matter.
But on top of that, we have the
Arcturus shot. Self amplifying. That's the real direction
I think they're pivoting into, self amplifying. That
is still continuing. They didn't stop it. And
and he, by name, said that Arcturus was
not gonna stop.
Self amplifying mRNA COVID shots too. Great. That's
not stopping. We also have I think it
was Amplitude Therapeutics and plenty of others that
are currently being worked on that are COVID,
that are mRNA.
You all know that because you watch this
show. But frustratingly, it doesn't seem to break
through to anybody that needs to see it,
and that's how the suppression and algorithmic suppression
works. So here's Lib's TikTok.
The feds just discovered an illegal biolab in
Las Vegas. The owner of the property is
Chinese National who previously arrested in connection to
the California biolab. Okay.
Well, yeah, that seems to be what's going
on except the fact that it's not the
full story.
And this is being reported because I honestly
think this person who seems to not even
know the name Epstein anymore is going, look
at this thing. Oh my god. And what
Muslims in The UK? And Elon Musk is
right about censorship over there. Just anything else,
anything.
On top of that, this is something that,
you know what what are the you you
know, election stealing, COVID nineteen,
Bio Labs, China, Muslims. You just you just
yell a story like that, you're gonna get
all the team sport idiots out there jumping
on it because that's what they're into.
Doesn't mean they're not doesn't mean they're not
important,
but this is what these kind of people
do is grab onto it. Elon will scream
something. You know, this is how it tends
to work on both sides, by the way.
But so what I think is interesting is
that after this came out, it developed a
little bit. Right? More information comes out, and
and turns out that it's an Israeli.
Well, weird how they never followed up on
a story. Not that they have to.
But something under Biola, you know, you'd think
that they would go, oh, well, developing story
as a journalist, that this is the next
part of the story. No. No. No. That's
not what they do. You might might wanna
reevaluate the word journalist there. But here's the
real point, guys.
And there's a couple different articles I'll show
you. This one is just from a local
NBC. And here here's the name of the
guy. A picture's, picture of the guy, Orie
Sullivan, or slight different there's an also another
variation of the name. Here's what's interesting to
me. First, before we even get into it,
and just you can see the investigation centers
on Ori Solomon, an Israeli citizen and property
manager of this location.
What's interesting to me, right, is that you
stand back objectively, like, okay. This could very
well still be China alone, who just happens
to work with Israeli. I mean, are we
are we of the mind that only Israel
and The US know how to pretend they're
someone else? No. Of course not. This could
just as easily be China doing this for
their own purposes.
I mean, even if it's con even not
even connected to anything else, and I genuinely
believe that. This could very much just be
their interest. But when you've taken the full
picture and all the evidence, it doesn't seem
to be the most likely to me.
But you could consider, right, it could also
just be the US government by itself
using a Chinese
a person involved with the
the the the media location, the manager being
an Israeli,
and then and just making you know, to
to muddy the waters.
So, honestly, that one's higher up on the
list for me because of what we know
they're doing and what they're drowning in. But
the other possibility is that this is an
Israeli operation. And this is about many different
things, including get you know, distraction, creating the
chaos in this country that I believe is
a part of it, but also the idea
of creating the, you know,
the the the larger global dynamic around where
this goes. And all of us, largely Republicans,
back before we got into the current chaos
that we're in, we're all kind of on
the edge of our seats going, what's the
next pandemic discussion? Are they gonna frame another
lie? Is it gonna be something that actually
happens? So, you know, like, we all talked
about this. So that's something we should consider.
And that Israel was a leader, along with
The US and UK, in this pandemic lockstep
conversation.
So keeping this in mind, don't take this
as just because he's Israeli, therefore we know
it's Israel. That's not the case. But it
matters with what we know Israel's involved in
and how, more than any group, what we
can see is this use of, you know,
dressing up like Palestinians and shooting people, you
know, or
creating sort of like a Muslim,
facade in order to carry out different terror
attacks.
So this could very well be something like
that. So consider this as we go forward.
This is channel,
thirteen ABC, property manager facing additional gun charges.
Now the weird overlap with the gun charges
I find interesting because that was a secondary
thing. They show up and they see guns.
They don't even take them because
warrant. Look at that. Amazing that people would
actually have warrants and follow the law. You
know? So like a like a mirage today.
It says, we previously told you about Ori
Solomon, who was booked into the Clark County
Jail for a fed felony charge of improperly
disposing of hazardous waste. So realize that already
he's been charged and and and, as far
as I could tell, already been let go,
which I find insane with what we're talking
about, we'll get to that, but that it
was disposing of hazardous waste. Okay. So we're
we're talking about labels and things he had
in these with, like, Ebola and names on
them.
And your only chart your charge is disposing
of hazardous waste. Well, if it's hazardous, then
which one was hazardous? And, see, this is
still going, so I'm not gonna they they
may still be researching. Right? They sent it
to the lab. My point is the last
one from California, we never found out what
they said those were. I don't think they
were anything.
That's my gut. I I think we're talking
about something that was made to look like
the way they're framing it.
That's how it felt because it didn't seem
like and and they just never followed up,
or, alternatively, that it turned out to be
very real, and they didn't wanna highlight who
it came back you know, tied back to.
My point is we don't know. Right? But
these are all considerations.
But so he was arrested and charged with
a felony for
disposing of hazardous waste. According to a federal
criminal complaint, during a search of of Solomon's
residence on 01/31/2026,
officers found a room that appeared to be
his office. Inside, they found a wallet and
his name, a French passport bearing the name
Ari Solomon, slightly different, and an Israeli passport
with the name Ari Solomon, one spelled with
an a in the beginning, one with an
o.
Now it doesn't I mean, in what there
are people that have multiple passports, yes. Usually
not spelled differently, though, unless
certain circumstances based on language differences. But realize,
per people that have Israeli and French passports
and this kind of they don't especially when
they're maybe operating an illegal biolab, and and
the rest you're gonna read here in a
second, doesn't that scream some kind of operation
or intelligence? It does to me. Doesn't prove
it. Could just have two passports, but I
think that's what seems to suggest to me.
And it continues, also inside the office, authorities
saw two nine millimeter bullets on the computer
stand and located a black Glock semiautomatic pistol
on the side cabinet.
O however, because the search warrant didn't include
a seizure of firearms, the gun was left
in the
residence. Now here's what's interesting. We'll show you
next. Solomon was on a work visa. Hey.
Look. It's an immigration thing. But I guess
they don't care about it because it's an
Israeli immigrant, so he's okay. He can do
whatever he want. He could run a nuclear
biolab and shoot people, and that doesn't matter
because he's Israeli. I'm obviously being facetious, but
isn't it interesting? There's more than just brown
people with the immigration conversation, guys. And there's
anyway, the point here
is that they knew this,
and they see guns.
You know? See what I'm saying? It's an
interesting you okay. If you're there and you
know who he is, then what wouldn't that
immediately be a violent it's interesting. Right? But
it says the next day, Solomon reportedly made
a call while in Clark County Jail, I
find this interesting, to a phone number listed
for his adult daughter. During the call, records
say Solomon asked, quote, Is there any guns
left?
That is a very weird question to ask.
Not like, is my gun still there? But
is there any guns left? Is there any
guns left in the house, or did they
confiscate it?
Now maybe the language barrier, and that's just
but, you know, seem that's what that statement
seems to suggest, like, do we still have
the guns? Can we still operate?
Just my opinion. Just the way then it
maybe that's me reading in how I think
it's going, but I find that standout. And
it says investigation into Solomon's immigration status prevents
him from owning guns. That's my point. They
would have known this going there. Right? So
they wouldn't have need to come back for
the I find that a weird circumstance. He
is currently in The US under an e
two nonimmigrant
visa.
On Monday, February 2, a search warrant was
granted for Solomon's home to include the seizure
of guns. Now in e two I'm not
familiar with e two nonimmigrant
visa.
If you know about that in the chat,
what do you think about that? What is
that I mean, is that what any immigrant
gets? What what's a nonimmigrant visa? I mean,
is he is that because he's Israeli?
That's not that's not some slight. The reality
is Israel's immigration is very different with this
country.
Well, I they basically, it doesn't exist if
you wanna be honest about that. They also
give them US passports to go and, I
mean, like, an intelligence side of it, to
to access
Iraq and other places. This has been proven
many times over. It's all illegal, by the
way. But when it says an e two
nonimmigrant visa, I just think that's interesting. Why
did he get that? Shouldn't we trace that
back? Is he doing something illegal? Was he
allowed to be here? Like, who gave him
that, guys? I find that relevant. If the
Chinese national, are we suggesting the US government
is giving
immigrant nonimmigrant visas to Chinese nationals who are
doing you know, it's it's a it's a
weird overlap. Something about this stands out to
me. Let me know what you think.
On Monday, February 2, a search warrant was
granted for Solomon's home to include the seizure
of guns, ammo, related items. During the search,
authorities seized six guns, ammunition, and firearm accessories.
That included four handguns and two rifles. Here's
what I find this interesting because we just
talked about
we just talked about, you know, the the
Halloween plot, which
I I off I challenge everybody to go
look. Tell me what happened. It's funny how
that just never talks about it again. It
was I I told you it was gonna
be hype, and I told but either way,
the point
is all the guns they had. They were
terrorists because they went to shooting ranges, and
they shoot you know, like any
terrorist American out there shooting their guns at
a shooting range. They had lots of weapons
and ammo like most gun owners, guys. But
what's crazy to me is that in this
case, you're talking about a you know, this
guy is not even he's on an immigrant
visa or non immigrant visa, and he got
six guns and ammunition. I'm not seeing people
calling him a terrorist. I'm not seeing the
it's weird the way I thought I think
it's quite obvious, the way the media left
and right, mainstream alternative and mainstream, decide to
just selectively frame it the way they want
to when they want, which really has very
little to do with what's actually happening.
Now it says Las Vegas, Metropolitan Police Department
sheriff, Kevin McMc,
McMahan or excuse me. Oh, it's an h.
McMahill
said investigators recovered, quote, evidence of possible
biological material including refrigerators with vials containing unknown
liquids. So the only reason it's possible is
because they had labels on them.
So
we need to demand to know what it
is.
Just in my opinion, because this this is
a weird continuing thing. And I'll show you
again what they're reporting, but we still don't
know what happened from the last one, which
tells me that I mean, if we if
they found something bad in those things and
didn't tell us, that's that tells me they're
covering up for somebody. You know what I
think? If they found them and there was
nothing bad in them, they didn't tell you,
that means they don't wanna be embarrassed by
or I I mean, I'm I'm I was
obviously giving my opinion. But if they didn't
find anything bad in there,
wouldn't they want you to know that? If
they're honest, yeah. I mean, this seems to
be like maybe they just overgrew the story.
At the end of the day, we need
to demand the follow-up, don't we? And this
is possible. That's where we are. Now it
says that channel thirteen reported a the home
is owned by an LLC registered to a
Chinese citizen
who was linked to similar investigations in Greeley,
California. So this gets interesting. Right? This guy's
the property manager of the bio lab. His
home is owned
by the person
who's linked to the California bio lab. So
to me, this starts to paint a very
interesting picture. You can't put this away anymore.
This is either China
literally involved you know, using Israeli citizens to
carry this out or The US doing the
same thing, or this is an Israeli operation
using Chinese entities because they know how that
will be framed.
All of those are possible. But I at
this point, we can't hide. There's no that's
not a coincidence, guys. The in the person's
name
oh, they didn't have in this article. It's
right here.
The person's name we're talking about, I'm gonna
come to this in a second,
is Xiaobei Zhu,
the Chinese citizen who was arrested in October
2023 with in con in in connection with
the other one. But here's what what it
says right here. They were only ever charged
or arrested in connection with manufacturing and distributing
misbranded medical devices.
And fa false statements.
What about all the biolab material they illegally
held? So that means to me that there
wasn't anything dangerous or they didn't want you
to know what they found. Like I just
said.
This is it's weird, isn't it? Wouldn't you
expect a follow-up to something that crazy?
And also find it very telling that the
Libs of TikToks of the world never follow-up.
Look at this thing crazy. Now the next
flashy story. Next the next thing I support.
I support the current thing. Never go back
and go, oh, look at that. It turned
out to be nothing because it's not in
their interest to show you that they hyped
a false story or whatever it means.
As general theater 13 reported, the home is
owned by,
a an LLC registered to a Chinese citizen.
And that very well right there,
the citizen we're talking about, could be a
entire front. That it's not it's registered to
this person, not necessarily that they're there or
living in there. And what's interesting as well
is there's multiple people living in the home
that nobody's telling us about.
It says, as of Sunday night, sources with
knowledge of the investigation told ABC News that
investigators were still working to determine what materials
they recovered.
Vials removed from the home are being taken
to the county's secure testing facility. We're testing
to determine whether they are harmful.
Watch watch as we never find out what
they were. I hope we do. But based
on last time, doesn't seem like they care.
Now this is from new NewsNation. Nevada judge
releases property manager.
This is the seventh today. So you're telling
me this guy gets arrested. What was it?
The second or the third?
For a possible illegal biolab kept like, you
with Ebola and COVID nineteen,
illegal guns
that violates his visa.
Like, all sorts of wildly concerning things, especially
imagine what the Trump administration, ICE, and Cash,
and Bongino, and and whatever, and Bondi would
do to
a random guy, immigrant from El Salvador, who
had one gun or whatever. They would treat
him like a terrorist. They would lock him
up. In this case, go ahead. You can
go free. We'll deal with you later, Israeli
citizen. Do you think that plays a factor?
I certainly do.
So he's free now. With all the things
we're and it's up in the air. As
of right now, it's still up in the
air. How do you let someone go under
the
allegation of, what,
bioterrorism?
And then just let him go?
A federal judge order and realize, no. We're
not talking about, like,
in that like, these are things he was
caught with. He's breaking the law because of
multiple things. So it's not like you're letting
him go because we're still investigating him. He
was caught and found and and with the
guns and everything are immediate violation.
He shouldn't be let go. A federal judge
ordered the release Friday of the property manager
connected to the suspected biolab
who prosecutors charge with unlawfully possessing guns.
That's it.
Okay.
So it's obvious that there's something going on
here to me. But like the whole black
hole analogy, it's you I don't think we
can tell for sure what that is, but
it's pretty obvious that there's things being affected
by whatever this is. And it's not just
one person, one entity. You know, this is
a this is something, guys, and that's my
opinion. US magistrate judge, Ilana,
Yochach, released Ori Solomon,
55,
on a personal,
recognizance bond, ordering him to surrender his passport
and stay within the Continental US. Should Solomon
leave,
he must inform the court.
How much you wanna bet he goes to
Israel?
You know my opinion. That's all clearly my
opinion.
Do you think I mean, this person has
a French and Israeli passport.
Do you think he's going to stay?
And look, if
he gives up his passport
and still gets out of the country, that
should tell you something. Well, I guess we'll
wait and see. Now this will be one
that you guys remind me of. I wanna
follow-up on this, and I wanna find out
what happens. You know, a week from now,
a month from now, I wanna follow-up, and
I wanna know I I think it will
matter. So keep it in my keep it
in my ear. Solomon, who is originally from
Israel, is the country is is in the
country on a nonimmigrant visa and is barred
from owning guns, as we said earlier. During
searches, teams were, covered guns from Solomon's home.
The Las Vegas BioLab is connected to a
similar incident in California where officials found infectious
agents. But here's what's interesting. This is NewsNation.
You know, it's major partisan. That's not the
case, though. And this is what I'll show
you. They they found things they believed to
be and then sent to the lab. There
has been no verification as far as I
can tell that they actually found those things
there. Now it says, where officials found infectious
agents, HIV, malaria, NewsNation affiliate,
first reported Sunday. An LLC tied to the
Combs
country rec county records matches the name of
a company that is part of an ongoing
federal case in California.
Same point. Just find that crazy. In that
case, a Chinese citizen, David He, faces federal
charges for allegedly manufacturing and distributing miss misbranded
medical devices. Now, technically, what we're talk I
don't I actually think this might be a
mistake by them. He is the other person
involved, but I'm pretty sure it was you
who we'll go we'll go to the next
article. Either way, those two people were involved.
I believe it was the other one who
was being charged, but I could be mistaken.
It goes on to say an attorney for
he did not return a request for comment.
And he the he the the the person's
name is h e, does not face charges
connected to Las Vegas.
He communicated with Solomon in the month before
the raid.
Okay. There's no way we must there's a
connection here, clearly. According to Metro Police, samples
from the Sunrise Manor home were undergoing testing.
Okay.
So they were in communication. The person who
was being charged in connection with the California
BioLab,
with an Israeli citizen, that must matter. What
I find telling is how that's nowhere in
the conversation
other than people like us who are trying
to put it in the conversation.
But if you get into the May you
know, the the mainstream alternative, mainstream media, they
they they're this is something that even though
in these articles seems to be willfully left
off,
which has kind of always been the way
this works.
New York Times, FBI investigates links to biological
labs in Las Vegas and California.
This is federal and local law enforcement officials
in Vegas are investigating a possible illegal laboratory,
this was on the 6th,
in the residential subdivision that they say may
be linked to another similar investigation. Yeah. And
it I I appreciate the objectivity. But at
this point, if you can prove that the
guy is the same guy who owns it,
if you can prove that they were communicating,
that that is a connection.
Period. That's not need that doesn't need to
be proven. There's a connection. But it what
that means, well, that's that's what we need
to find out. So I just you know,
it's to me, there's not a
maybe a link that there is a link
without question.
But maybe they're just friends. Maybe that's the
link. You see my point? But it's that's
a weird way to frame it. In Las
Vegas, Ori Solomon fifty five was charged this
week with one count of illegal possession of
firearms
and disposing and discharging of hazardous waste.
What kind of waste? Does Does that matter?
What I mean, what you just get charged
with an arbitrary waste disposal? What was he
disposing of? Are they are they Ebola? That
certainly matters, doesn't it? Mister Solomon was believed
to be the property manager at the Las
Vegas home. A lawyer for mister Solomon did
not immediately respond. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police
Department first became aware of the possible lab
after employees
of Solomon reported becoming gravely ill after going
into his garage,
which contained vials with reddish liquid according to
a police report obtained by Las Vegas Review
Journal. It's funny how these these points aren't
coming up anywhere else. And so what's crazy
to me, and you could read the Las
Vegas Review,
is that you're saying that his people, who
apparently, it seems, were also living there, but
nobody's being told who they are or where
they're from,
were the ones that ended up pointing to
this.
They work there.
I find that a weird overlap. Now, I
mean, you realize we're talking about a small
it's not like do they just? So you're
in a room. This is what I find
crazy about this reporting.
You can see the pictures
of a,
like, a bio laboratory stuff. Right? With the
state we've seen all these pictures going around.
I think they've got one. Oh, it's in
the archive. You can find them. Like, here.
Like, this is what they look like, but
realize inside, you know, you can see the
the,
ice chest in the garage, the different things
they're showing. It has the look of something
that's not just, oh, those are some beers
in there. Right? Same with the last one.
So my point is,
you work there. Are you telling me you
weren't able to discern that there was something
weird going on there? That you only until
I started feeling weird that I'm gonna go,
Hey, there's something weird going on other than
the biolaboratory you're working in?
Seems like a weird thing to go, so
I question what those people are doing there,
who they're, you know, whether they're, you know
I question what the what the involvement is
of the three people we're gonna point to
here. Last month, the Las Vegas police received
information that laboratory equipment and potentially hazardous materials
were being likely being kept in that home,
according to police statement.
Last month?
That's interesting.
So I guess that could be, like, January
30. Right? But we're I just they hope
that way, you know, if you could hey.
We might have an illegal bio lab. Oh,
we'll get to it.
But it says, the police said mister Solomon
was a may a a a main, quote,
agent and conspirator
with someone connected to the investigation into another
illegal biological laboratory.
That's what the police said. I find this
so telling that the police there, the local
police who are investigating this. This is what
always tends to happen with the Utah investigation.
You get the local police who are like,
okay, this is child abuse. And then it
comes to the higher level in the corporate
media and the government, and they step on
it, which hey. Epstein files. I think we
know why today.
In this case,
you're talking about, the the he was by
the local police called an agent and a
conspirator
and said it was directly connected to the
account, which it is. But yet the reporting
has subtly
changed. Right? And I find it interesting if
the police knew that. I mean, let's let's
be clear. They knew that he was an
Israeli right in the beginning, and that didn't
really I mean, it's it's this feels controlled.
All my opinion.
Investigators link the property owner to a 2023
biological laboratory we discussed, Reedley, California, where investigators
found materials, quote, possibly associated with infectious diseases
like hepatitis, COVID, HIV. Right. Same thing in
a warehouse.
Now, Xia Baiju, a Chinese citizen, was arrested
in October 2023 in connection with manufacturing and
distributing those misbranded medical devices and making false
statements.
According to court documents, mister Zhu and others
made, imported, sold, and distributed hundreds of thousands
of COVID nineteen test kits, as well as
tests for HIV.
What an interesting overlap. Now at the time,
in California Point, it was like, okay. Well,
they China, China, China. Right? Because they're testing
and China and COVID and the whole thing,
which is what we should question.
But now with the understanding that Zhu was
connected to, you know, Zhu, z h u,
was connected to
the house where the Israeli
citizen lived and seemed to manage this,
and he was over here making COVID tests,
like, you should at least be able to
consider that maybe that was an Israeli run
manipulation
using these tests, which I am convinced was
a huge part of what COVID was.
Just consideration.
A SWAT team found
three people.
Now I can't tell whether that's the employees
or they live
from the reporting I can see, they have
three people they found they say renting rooms
inside the home.
Okay. But then if you have employees working
in this location, how does that work? And,
you know, it's it's fleshing out. But three
people living there who are may or may
not be the same people who called it
in or may or may not be the
people that work there, The police say they
were not involved and were removed safely.
And that's it.
Which, I mean, if they were just random
people, there's no reason we should demand. But,
I mean, I find that strange. You lived
in this home with all the stuff we
can see in those pictures and you didn't
find that strange?
Tells me that you either didn't care those
weird things were going on or that maybe
you were involved with that. And if we're
talking about an Israeli operation, I think it's
easy to understand, like with Abramov or, no,
was Abramovitch? Tom? The Israeli
pedophile or child predator who they just let
go back to Israel after he came here
to rape children. Not a joke. Literally caught
setting up a sting operation trying to get
child children to come and have sex with
him. And the US government let him go
back to Israel. Just happened. I'm sure you
guys saw that. So in this kind of
situation, we should be going, okay. Is there
something else happening here? Whether that's China,
Israel, or anything else. Because Saudi Arabia, for
example, I keep pointing that out as well.
Same thing as Israel. Saudi Arabians,
in many cases,
Oregon had a huge case about it that
the local police, yet again, saying these people
are raping women and just flying back to
Saudi Arabia, and the government doesn't care.
So ask yourself whether we're talking about you
know, I think it's important to find out
who these three people were.
Investigators focused on the garage and found refrigerators,
a freezer, laboratory type equipment, and numerous containers
holding unknown substance. That didn't stand out to
anybody.
You know what I mean? Like, laboratory equipment
and cases full of things. To me, the
three people, the employees, it that's that's clear
to me.
The items were and look at the pictures.
You'll see the same thing. The items were
consistent with what was found in the California
investigation,
sheriff Kevin,
McMahill
of the Las Vegas, police said at the
conference.
He said more than a thousand samples were
taken at the scene. The materials were sent
to the FBI lab for further testing. Great.
Kash Patel will get right on that. The
police said the location was safe and that
there was no danger to neighbors.
He said that a mode the the said
a motive remained unclear.
So there's no risk.
That means they've either removed everything or they
realized it wasn't dangerous. Likely that they sent
it away to, you know, in it's a
test it. But to me,
this whole thing seems pretty damn strange.
Right? Right? With all the different overlaps, the
people that were there, the way that this
went down, that these people are now just
vanished into the wind, they were living there
while he's working on whatever they claim this
is.
This stands out to me.
Now
asking Grock regarding the BioLab incident in California,
have they ever told us what was proven
to be in those files? And you can
find this report in plenty of the locations.
No authorities have not definitively proven or confirmed
through testing what was actually inside most of
those files. And what's interesting is the CDC
visit they on the site basically compiled a
list of the 20 potential
infectious agents based on visible labels, and that's
what everyone reports.
And that's where we are. Don't you find
that strange?
When they were like, good news, everybody. It
turned out that wasn't a problem. Well, even
if it wasn't, they kinda want you to
think that's always looming, in my opinion. So
however you look at this, I think it
definitely matters they never told us what was
in that. Now a a an overlapping story
to this,
simultaneously, December
into January, but pretty much simultaneously happening, especially
when you take the California point into the
Las Vegas point. In between those times, we
have this in December 19.
Now this very well may well may this
might just be
connect you know, connected because it's the same
biolab conversation and no other way.
But because of what we're talking about and
the concern of what may be happening,
and this and this is being such a
clear example of what they are basically calling
sabotage, it makes you wonder what somebody in
this conversation,
another state, somebody within this country, whatever it
is, trying to create either
fear or an actual pandemic.
Investigation of Fort Detrick lab finds hole in
airtight suit was intentional.
Breakdown in safety culture. Now part of me
wonders whether that is sort of the people
making it about Trump,
which is not an unfair statement. The culture
of what they've created, not just Trump, is
insane. I'm not talking about left versus right.
I'm talking about just lawlessness.
You know, lying.
I mean, the way that they're conducting themselves
is just petty, childish, and and ridiculous to
me. And it's not about left and right.
It really is just about power.
But in this case,
my point being is there is a difference
there, but I think I'm just wondering whether
this is on top of just the obvious
sabotage,
the idea they also just go, oh, and
it's because of what he's brought in. You
know, consider that.
But if they're they're if the people in
this lab are continuing
are are demonstrating a change in culture and
safety, and I mean, like, literally, not just
ideas, but that these people are no longer
being safe, which is what they're saying, and
that started sort of with this change of
the guard, it makes you wonder whether that
might just be the case. Or, like I'm
kind of insinuating or highlighting, it might be
deliberate.
Consider all of it. Now, this is from
the, December
19.
An investigation into a hole in a hazmat
suit used by researchers who work with some
of the world's most deadly pathogens at Fort
Detrick,
spurring a work stoppage,
just like before COVID, by the way.
2019.
Research into deadly viruses and biological weapons at
US Lowry Lab shut down over fears they
could escape. Now, just for the record right
now, I don't have to put fear unnecessarily.
They've already well, I guess it's just as
concerning that it's working. They've it's back up
and running. So don't don't worry. Fort Detrick
is pumping that bad stuff out again. Well,
it's interesting, you know, that it shut down.
And well, actually, if I remember correctly
remember correct me if I'm wrong. In this
situation, during the COVID nineteen time frame, I
believe it shut down, and I believe it
was back up and running again before the
main thing started. Am I let me know
if you think I'm correct about that. There's
so many different data points. I'm forgetting whether
the timeline overlapped or whether it was down
and it was just kinda continually shut down
well into when the COVID narrative started. But
either way, it's not it it really doesn't
change the concern. Like, if this shutdown, the
implication is that there might be a safety
risk. Right? And if there might be a
safety risk, then that means something might have
gotten out. Like, that that's the logic. And
so that's one of the concerns.
And it says,
continuing,
though they found that the the act they
found the action intentional. I find that very
important. The investigation also found a larger breakdown
of trust in the leadership,
taking safety concerns seriously
at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases.
So right there, you know, I'm you could
argue that there's an ideological division. That probably
plays a factor in everything today.
But do we not also see that generally
happening, like this kind of fly by the
seat of your pants, kind of, you know,
move fast and break things kind of mindset?
And so you you're wondering whether that might
literally they got rid of all the people
that they didn't want, you know, and now
people that are there are
basically he you know, just whatever Trump needs,
who cares about the costs? That's what that's
what everything else seems to be like. But
it says,
they they oh, just basically at at Fort
Detrick as we're discussing. Investigators concluded that a
hole in a maximum containment lab,
in the user's airtight protective suit was made
intentionally according to the incident report dated April
4 that was provided by the National Institute
of Health. The the,
the Frederick news post obtained a report on
Thursday
through a public,
records request.
The investigation could not determine the cause of
the hole or who created it. That's pretty
unnerving.
Actually, I just thought of one thing I
wanna add really quickly. Hold on one second.
Oh, you know what? I don't think I
have it anymore.
That's too bad. Oh, maybe I have it
in here. There was an old clip that
I've played about the,
Fort Detrick.
Let's see.
Yo. It is right there. Okay. Good. I
wanna play this one next. It's a short
clip just like it's just the opening clip
I have for it, but it's it's another
example of where where where we get done
with this part about Fort Detrick? I'll play
this for you just to show you, it's
a clip from a documentary about literally about
Fort Detrick and how people all around it
are getting cancers. You know? It's and it's
probably no different than most of these biolabs,
especially the ones they have in Georgia, the
country, that people have been sick around forever
because it's not in The United States. No
one seems to care.
It goes on to say,
excuse me,
parts of the perimeter of the whole,
like, around whatever was cut or or, you
know, what how however it was done, looked
cleanly cut while others appeared forcefully separated
or ripped apart, the report states. Part of
the suit's face shield was cut away and
was never located. Based on the opinion of
the numerous subject experts, the investigators concluded the
hole was intentionally graded.
So, like, you know, like, imagine a thing
that would allow you know, whatever you think
about the the the validity of how that
works, the argument being that that would allow
them to potentially get sick.
IRF,
Frederick's work includes
research this is Fort Detrick, includes research on
viruses that cause high consequence diseases, Ebola, COVID
nineteen, according to n I AID's web page
on the facility.
Between the time the individual departed the room
and with the suit in, quote, excellent condition,
to the time they entered and found the
hole in the suit, records show there were
68 entries
to and 60 departures from the evolved changing
room. So, essentially, 60 people, maybe even six
well, how would that work if they came
in and all 60 came out?
Well, at least 60 people who are potentially
responsible.
No one interviewed, they say, had witnessed the
creation of the hole. And they no one
who had witnessed it admitted to being involved
or had any direct knowledge of how the
hole was made.
Interesting. Especially if they believe it's intentional, that
means that somebody in this lab, literally one
of the most alarming places in this country,
is trying to sabotage it. And we still
don't know who it is. In an email
to the Frederick News Post in May, NIH
said the decision to stop all work at
the facility followed, quote, identification and documentation of
personal issues, personnel issues involving
contract staff that compromise the safeties,
the facility's safety culture.
Now there's a lot of overlaps, whether it's
Israel or anybody else. There are points in
which there's other people that come through this
location.
But if I can't find for the life
of me what they would contract staff could
very well just mean scientists in US. Right?
But they're the ones that compromise the safety
culture.
That's a very specific statement.
So
you're trying to figure out who in the
staff that who compromised. Okay. So the lab's
back up and running right now.
To the best of my knowledge, I can't
find a report about how you found somebody,
how you caught the guy.
So what's happening right now? You have somebody
in this lab that wants to sabotage what's
happening, and you either didn't tell us who
that was or you never found out and
you started working again anyway.
That seems concerning.
Two weeks after the stand down began,
the NIH director Jay Bhattacharya wrote on Twitter
for, that, quote, a contractor
at the lab had deliberately cut a hole
in the biocontaminate
suit over a personnel a personal dispute with
a coworker.
To me, that sounds like they know exactly
who it was and exactly why it happened.
And yet, we don't get to know?
Isn't that a major I mean, that's that's
that's a board that's a national security issue.
If you're talking about people who are so
if it literally is a petty dispute to
the point to where you want to sabotage
somebody with a
a pandemic, you know, whatever you wanna call
it, an Ebola risk or whatever it is,
then whatever you think about that. The idea
being
that that seems
like I mean, it either speaks to the
the culture they were pointing to. That somebody
in this position with how serious this is
would take that action for, you know, either
that or something much different, much larger that
we're hiding behind the story.
Right? Or or, you know, or or that,
what was the other part I was gonna
say?
Anyway, just at the end of the day,
this is something that seems they know.
I find it crazy that we don't know
who that is if the argument is you
potentially did something like that.
And it says, what what where when they
what they wear when they're dealing with dangerous
pathogens. And it says, an ongoing investigation revealed
a pattern,
even worse, going back to the Biden administration.
This is what this is him this is
his quote from Trump's administration.
An ongoing investigation revealed a pattern, going back
to the Biden administration, of safety not taken
as seriously as it ought.
Okay?
So, yeah, Biden bad.
And us too though, because we're doing it
right now. Okay. Or is it that it
carried over for Biden?
Aren't we just tired of this lazy argument?
Guess what, though? It still happened in Trump's
last administration. Guess what, Bonicharo? It happened under
Obama's administration. Guess what? Can we keep going?
Goes back I just played the opening clip.
I mean, this is ridiculous. The argument that
the safety issues that have been going on
for decades suddenly happened to Biden and that's
why it's still there, that's lazy, Jay. You
can do better than that. Or that's what
he's being told to say, which is what
all the rest of the yes men in
this administration seem to be doing. It makes
me sad that somebody like this, who in
other situations was staying you know,
why would you put like, Gabbard, for example.
Why do you put yourself in that position
to be made the fool
for Trump
or who for the globalist agenda this government
is right now. But to me,
that's frustrating. And he goes on to say,
so with RFK Jr's blessing, I immediately ordered
all work to halt and all dangerous pathways
secured. And now it's up and running again,
though.
Bhattacharya further stated he would not reopen the
lab until he was satisfied that work can
be done there
with zero risk to public safety. Well, that's
been a risk from this lab as far
as I've been alive. Well, here's a good
place to play this clip because this risk
is still there right now. We have over
thirteen hundred documented
cancer victims right now just in a one
mile radius.
I'll be quite honest with you. It's changed
my life so radically. Sometimes I don't even
know who I am.
1,300 people in a one mile radius.
What's causing so much sickness?
It turns out all these victims have one
thing in common. They live next to a
military base called Fort Detrick.
That's so hard to ignore.
Now I I I just, off the top
of my head, grabbed that. I'm gonna I'll
try to find it and include the documentary
so you guys can have that. And I
might wanna go through the longer clip of
that in another show because, you know, it
gets into the the the children, you know,
the people that go to high school there.
Like and there's the the common knowledge.
They all know. We just you don't just
don't drink the water here. That's insane. That's
an American city that's like, no. You you'll
get sick drinking the water. On top of
that, that they people around there get sick.
They all know that. There's all kind of
weird things that I mean, it's a collective
understanding
there. It just blows my mind.
So back to the point, him saying, don't
worry. We're gonna make sure there's no risk.
Too late. It's already there. Simply because you're
working on gain of function, first of all.
Secondarily, because this lab has been rife with
these problems till this very moment as far
as I've been here. So that's just again,
in case you missed the third time I
said it, it's back open right now.
And the this is what he said here
is interesting to me.
He further stated he would not reopen the
lab until he'd be satisfied, that there's zero
risk to the public, alluding to the possibility
of, quote, lab generated pandemics.
Well, so you literally just
suggested, which we know that this is place
that could do that.
And you're still working on it, and you're
still still open. Okay. Just make sure we're
clear on that. Let's reopen that and keep
the threat of lab generated pandemics continuing.
Kennedy said HHS
brought in the FBI.
I mean, every time I hear that these
days, I'm, like, I mean, I've always had
a, I think, accurate opinion, accurately low opinion
of the FBI and what they really are.
It's the very anti American institution. I've been
to that very clear argument in the past
about what they've always seemed to have done,
and it is not in the interest with
the cons it's it's not in line with
the constitution in my mind. And that does
not mean, by the way, that everybody working
there is in line of that mind or
that they all do bad things, just like
people in the military.
Whether or not I believe I understand the
reality of what the government's doing doesn't mean
that people that go there with the wrong
the what they believe is the right intention
but they're misled doesn't make them bad people.
They they thought they were going to fight
for you. That makes them a good person.
At the end of the day, they were
lied to. It's the same kind of thing
to consider. But my point is with Kash
Patel leading this institution,
when they get involved, I'm like, great. What's
gonna happen now? Kennedy said that they brought
in the FBI to investigate the alleged issue.
Well, I'm sure as soon as they found
out it was something connected to anything that
makes Trump look bad, they just shut it
all down. That's how this works. It appear
and look, we just went over this yesterday
in regard to what Cash Patel and Bonnie
are doing with the Epstein files or tons
of examples where they in the moment they
find out it's uncomfortable for Trump, they will
close it down. Even if it's of the
utmost importance to you and the American people.
It appears, quote, that it was a deliberate
criminal act. That's even more that's a much
more strong statement than than voluntary or the,
deliberate. A criminal act
that is equivalent to attempted murder because the
kind of microbes and pathogens they were handling
had a very high case fatality rate up
to that's Kennedy said that.
Okay. Well, then why is it up and
running again? If you're telling me this guy
with tem attempted murder,
is he why is he being arrested and
charged for a crime?
And you told me it was a a
a work dispute. I just think this is
so strange.
The investigation also found other safety protocols were
violated the facility. Yeah. No big deal. Back
up and running. I mean, it's like everything
else we're dealing with. It's like I get
it feels like as long as they can
they look a thing happen, and it's bad.
And we all go, oh, bad. They just
go right back to doing it. Look at
all the Epstein stuff. Bad. And now, well,
now no one's arrested. Let's go right back
to it.
Nah. We're all pointing this out right now.
It's pacification,
not accountability.
So in this case, other safety protocols seems
to be the status quo for this plat
this location. The report states that in other
incidents, an individual had knowingly entered
this is crazy to me. Knowingly entered inaccurate
information on a suit test log. So, not
just I'm gonna cut a hole in your
suit and try to kill you. But you're
surreptitiously behind the scenes entering in inaccurate information.
To me, that does not speak to a
petty coworker dispute. That is a planned, coordinated
disaster.
My opinion.
Entered inaccurate information in a suit log. And
there's more than this. And an individual failed
to follow procedures for reporting and repairing a
hole in their suit that led to an
infiltration of liquid on multiple occasions. That's a
separate incident. So here you have them cutting
a hole in somebody's suit. In this case,
you have them not reporting or repairing one
that they put back away that led to
other potential catastrophes.
Do you not see what I'm seeing here,
guys? This is somebody, I think, trying to
create a problem.
In investigators recommended an individual who had violated
both of the safety protocols, quote, be removed
from duties at Fort Detrick. Who's that?
Why isn't is he being charged with a
crime?
After concluding that they cannot be trusted to
follow safety protocols.
That's insane.
Is
where is he from? I mean, doesn't it
matter? Like, what what's what is the how
is this continuing to happen with all these
different overlapping conversations where these people just kinda
vanish into the background? The news post could
not confirm on Friday if the individual was
removed.
Let me read that again. They come out
and they tell you, well, this guy, who
you we will not name,
needs to be removed because he violated these
safety protocols.
They're telling you that they cannot, as of
Friday, confirm that if he was ever removed
at all.
Investigators
also found that in a separate incident,
inactivated
tissue samples
were transferred out
of maximum containment before
a principal investigator
authorized the transfer.
I mean,
this is the same story it's always been.
To me, this is not clumsy.
This is not accidents. These are not accidents.
If we can show a consistent track record
of this location
doing this,
it's either you have to realize that they
just don't care that they're not incompetent, which
I find hard to believe, or that there's
something else going on here.
And so here, we can have this situation
where they're
literally
bringing out samples
without authorization. That's in that is that's like
the the the lar at the top of
the list.
So now you got sabotage of suits,
sabotage, you know, of of multiple suits. I
mean, all on top of bringing
potentially
pandemic causing things outside of the lab.
And we don't even know who this guy
is. Or guys, by the way, because it
seems there's multiple people involved. The incident report
also cites occasions when changing rooms were left
in disarray with stuff on the floor, which
might not be a big deal when when
a general sense. But when you understand what
they're dealing with in this high level science,
like like,
you know, what's the word?
You know, just a highly sealed,
sterile environment.
And you they're just leaving things on the
floor. Like, that that does speak to just
lazy, no one keeping you know, that may
be just a cultural thing, in the sense
of, like, a business culture. Investigators did not
believe, quote, reexamining these events in detail
would assist determining the person responsible for creating
the hole in the suit that prompted the
investigation.
Yeah. Who cares? We don't believe that looking
into the very relevant overlapping parts of the
story is gonna help us investigate this story.
Right? Why don't we look into the other
suits they sabotage to find out what the
you know, I mean, it's it's just again,
I'm being critical because I feel like we
should be, but there very well may be
a part of the story that this platform
is not including, just to be objective. But
if this is everything in front of us,
which I believe it is when you break
this down and look at the other reporting,
doesn't that just seem like a what's the
use of investigating the rest of it?
Especially when you don't have anybody who's been
charged no more than ever. To me to
me, this seems like a let's put it
to bed kind of conversation.
Quote, reporting of safety concerns
or general concerns within the histo
histology group has not been met with appropriate
actions or reactions,
which has led to a significant breakdown in
the trust within the group of its leadership's
ability
to take safety concerns or other concerns seriously
or to address issues within group within group
without retaliation
to the party bringing up the issue.
So it's very well might just be some
ridiculous,
like, partisanship has destroyed this country.
So that very well may just be the
point that these people just hate each other.
I mean, that that is one of the
possibilities. But with all the rest we're seeing,
I do feel it could be that that's
the case and it's being exploited by somebody
else. But
how it's happening in the first place should
blow your mind.
Quote, it is imperative that this culture change
be addressed to prevent any further breakdown in
safety culture within the group as a whole.
Pretty crazy.
Now, again, remember, Fort Detrick, the shutdown right
before this. Now, if you remember the way
this went, guys, Fort Detrick shutdown.
Right? And then we had
the nursing home situation.
These are sort of simultaneous for this purpose
of the point. They're they're dip slightly different.
But so you had the Fort Detrick location,
and all around there, you had all these
weird outbreaks of this, you know, pneumonia.
All the ground the ground glass opacity. Remember
that? And they just went in that and
that perp that was exactly what the first
thing was said about whatever they called COVID,
and they just stopped talking about that. The
point was around the nursing home, which you
could see as an extension of this if
that's if that's what you think happened, had
the same problem, had the same weird novel
pneumonia, and they all started having the same
ground glass opacity. Same thing.
And then the timing perfectly leads right overlapping
with the military world China World Game the
the China, the military world games.
And how remember
that the US government military
always excels there. You know, pretty much historically,
they do really well. And that year, they
did
unprecedentedly bad.
Could just be coincidence, but then there's reports
of military US people being sick. It's all
easy to look up.
So the question becomes, was that literally what
this you know, or was it by design?
Now I I also understand the larger questions
that we went over in this conversation about
the the questioning of what was there, the
questioning of whether any of it's there. These
are important conversations.
My point is always was that whether or
not this was a the the
hype around what wasn't there to cause this
or it was something that they they're real
examples of things they're doing to people, of
things they're working on. And I want and
I I worry that that is, in fact,
in the same vein. I'm the point is
we should worry about this regardless.
But I do understand the point. And I
I often and I I will actually include
Denny Renkor,
his interview I had with him, more than
one, in fact.
But or Denny Renkoo, excuse me, that that
he made multiple points about this. And I
think this is the important one to consider.
That his argument, as always, I make this
every time, data proves COVID nineteen's actually an
illusion. Now that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
It could.
What it means is that with the he
did he did his research on this to
make the point that should somebody have wanted
to
create an illusion of what COVID-nineteen was,
all the tools were already there. From the
combining of flu and pneumonia, which is what
they did, from using false positive PCR tests,
from the the cycle threshold, I mean, all
these different points. He proved with his data
that you could have literally created exactly what
they pointed to without anything.
Now, let alone something that might have been
involved that wasn't that severe. Right? Or however
you look at it. So that doesn't mean,
yes, it absolutely, but it means that they
that the data shows those things were and
and my point I shouldn't the reality is
he does believe that. I do too. But
what this argument is is and framed the
right way to people that need to hear
it is that the facts, the data, the
math
shows that everything they did created that illusion.
But But I I always wanna include, though,
that it could have very well been something
that was like like some of those the
ionitis group said that it was less than
the flu. So if that was something that
was there, if it was there at all,
it was less than the flu, and that's
why they had to manufacture all this. There's
so much to get into. But I'll include
this for you to check out. His work
is very important in my opinion.
So, anyway, the point was in regard to
the trend, you know, that ended up over
the World Military Games, and then that segued
right into the beginning of all this. And
that there very much was something that was
going on there
in the sense of, like, the conversation. I
will include this show we did, which I
think is an important one. 2023, we basically
went back and made this overlapping, connection. The
revisiting Fort Detrick and the vaping overlap. That's
also remember the whole point about the the
I think it was, wasn't Acosta. It was
the other guy's name.
I'm blanking on his name. But, basically, he
was trying to get Trump to talk about
this, and he said, oh, Trump only wanted
to talk about vaping. And there was the
same vaping thing. Oh, the vaping illness. Vaping
illness. Ground glass opacity.
So my thought was maybe that's all it
was, being called something else. But COVID origins
as eco health restarts COVID coronavirus work. It's
a good show to get into all of
this.
Now to finish with this point, and we'll
get just give you a couple quick things
to wrap up here about Epstein that I
want you to see and, some over some
ending points around Iran because that does seem
to be continuing
before the next show we get into. I
wanna make sure we reiterate this again because
I I I wanted to point them out
earlier so you saw them as we're going
through. But I just this is just so
frustrating that we deal with stuff like this.
You know? So this was the show in
twenty twenty five August. Trump admin leans into
self amplifying mRNA,
SAM RNA or SARNA, same point, under the
guise of ending mRNA, and we discuss RNA
in food,
which Massey and plenty of others talked about,
but they're doing. Make they're all they're making
all transgenic
vaccine it's all going on, guys. And Massey
even tried to get it in our legislation,
and they didn't want it. Surprise, surprise.
But
this conversation is really just about the the
overlap where they came and said, we are
stopping mRNA. And I showed you the statement
they put out where it listed right in
that statement
that we are not stopping all of mRNA.
We're stopping the $500,000,000
discussion, but we're keeping our tours, we're keeping
Amplitude, and we're continuing our our mRNA in
every other category.
So right then, with his press release, why
was everybody claiming that they ended mRNA? Because
we live in this broken media world right
now. And whether it's all the mainstream mainstream
alternative screamers or that it's all some very
because remember, the corporate media did the same
thing. When if their argument is they're all
wanting to fight Trump because they're the deep
state and he's the good guy, why wouldn't
they have been like he's lying about that?
Because they're all in it when it comes
to these larger agendas. We must see that
by now. So this is a good show
to watch if you wanna understand that. It's
very clear. I'll include these specific links.
Arcturus,
therapeutic receives US FDA fast track. Now this
one was during his administration, 2025.
That's obvious.
This one was specifically about the in the
the swine flu or the bird flu was
it the influenza,
which one was it? Anyway, the h five
n one.
Self amplifying.
Now remember, this goes beyond the one we
talked about. In fact, my argument is that
was the first one. They just changed because
the original Pfizer documentation showed the h one
b one n two or whatever the original
number was as self amplifying. I've I've showed
you that before.
But then it became was called the the
different versions. Then they point into self amplifying,
self spreading as the future. And both those
are very real research.
My point is that the argument of self
amplifying was that it continues to produce the
antigen. Well, that's what this does. We know
that. So why haven't we admitted that yet?
It continues to produce in your body as
we've proven a 100,000 times over.
So that is the thing. And I think
it was all this is largely, I think,
by design.
You also have this one, which is actually
a COVID nineteen shot. Now this one was
started in 2024, but the point is Trump
and his administration
are provably
continuing this.
And this is going. It is an mRNA
self amplifying COVID nineteen shot on top of
Comernity, which is also an mRNA shot, which
I argue is self self amplifying based on
the reality of what it does. Either way,
it is out there. And they're all I
mean, not only are Trump just told you
it was the best thing since sliced bread
again.
Again. In front of Davos, in front of
everybody, and we're we're pretending they're stopping?
Now, here is Arcturus, but you can get
into all the rest of it. This is
five months ago. Arcturus Therapeutics advances mRNA therapeutics
pipeline. Look at that, guys. We're right back
in the same place.
Moderna, the pug plug and play pipeline platform.
It's the same thing. All they did was
just
move the window dressing, guys.
With strong financial performance and strategic focus,
Yes. It's all still continuing with direct support
from the US government on the record.
This one's from 01/12/2026.
Arcturus Therapeutics maps near term milestones for CF
mRNA therapy. Arcturus eight one zero at JPMorgan
conference. So all the all these different mRNA
and shots and vaccine, yes, that's the future,
guys.
Now whether or not you think that these
things are dangerous or not is is when
it matters, I think. But to the point,
is them lying about it.
That matters. Why would they go, we're not
doing that anymore, and then keep doing it?
Because they don't want people knowing that quite
obviously.
Now
I mean, shouldn't have to include it, but,
obviously,
day one, Stargate.
Here's our
COVID nineteen Larry Ellison,
OpenAI,
SoftBank, Israel connection. We're we're making COVID nineteen
shots with AI. Day one. And that didn't
change everybody's minds. How is that possible?
Clearly, this is not going away, guys. So
we need to keep talking about it. And
the biolab overlap and all the rest of
it, we should be asking ourselves whether there's
something going on to sort of drive us
into a certain place. Right? To get our
minds in a certain location and to get
us pointing at the wrong person. Or or
just pointing at,
you know I mean, because really, no matter
how you frame that, the argument can be
laid in any direction.
And so it's in my mind, it's not
about blaming anybody. It's about I mean, somebody
will do that, but it's about creating the
risk that can be used to rationalize the
action. It's always what they do. So keep
that in mind. Now, to end with a
couple of overlapping things here, I always do
that. I get the word stuck in my
head.
This is very telling to me,
and it's about Epstein and the files.
But right now, how clear it is that
this they're drowning in this, pretty much the
entirety of the government. But right now, the
worst is the people that have been claiming
they wanna expose this and are still pretending
like Trump is doing that.
And Massey has been
tearing them apart because he's standing by this
and calling for it. Now we should, as
always, question whether he's got different intentions and
motivations.
Always question that for everybody.
But in regard to what he's doing, it's
relevant because he's out there going, we need
to see this and you have a right
to see it. Yep. I agree. Even if
he's got different intentions. So here's something that
came out. This person who I'm not familiar
with
came out and said, here's Massey
telling you that he got old files on
a on a drive. And that he's you
know, basically, he has it and he hasn't
released it becomes the point. So here's let's
let's play the clip first. Here's what's going
around.
Oh, another one.
See, I knew I did that earlier. Hold
on a second.
Not that you need to know this as
I'm grabbing it, but there I accidentally
I knew I did it. Didn't I just
delete that? And I
didn't listen to myself. Hold on. Here it
is.
Alright.
It's that simple. Why do you think he
is working so hard not to get them
released for so many months? What do you
think the real reason is? It these files
implicate
billionaires and friends of him and of his
and of political donors,
that he's trying to protect. And Epstein also
had close ties to our own intelligence agencies
and Israel's intelligence agencies. That's why there's so
much,
effort in trying to stop this. And and
I do believe they'll try to stop it
somewhere else,
and that's gonna backfire on them too. So
the
Now here's what's interesting.
Here we go. Oops.
So this is what here's what he frames
about this. Okay? Last night, I received a
flash drive containing the complete files belonging to
Jeffrey Epstein, claiming this is what Massey is
saying. Right?
Here,
this is what I find so fascinating about
this. Now look, first of all, what he
said was very obvious. It's just saying Epstein
files are hiding it. We all this is
obvious. And so it's interesting that it becomes
you know, there's a lot of information, like
with that woman, for example, Minnesota.
It's it's that's AI. Right? They becomes, well,
it's true anyway. Like, well, I disagree with
what you know, that's not actually the reality
of what's happening. But either way, it could
be. But doesn't it matter that somebody had
to make that? And somebody pointed out in
the comments. Like, well, you can't even consider
that they might have done that in order
to make you think that they tried to
hide it. Well, I do say that. I
say it every time. The op the possibility
could be that that video was made to
make you think
that there's nothing going that basically, that they
have to fake that, like my argument is,
and therefore, it's probably not happening. But I
can also consider that somebody would make it
for me to think that. And the opposite's
the case. I make this point every time.
Always consider every possible motivation, but I'll always
give you my opinion. Right? But so in
this case,
what he said, obviously. But it it matters
in the long run. I think that's a
larger point overall. But this is what I
asked this little Grock has to say. Check
this out. There's multiple points in this.
I said, where is this from?
It says the video from Twitter shows Steve
Bannon,
Not Massey, which I didn't even suggest that
it did. Speaking to reporters in a crowd.
And it says the original clip dates to
August 2017, shortly after Bannon was removed.
The current post incorrectly captions the video, talking
about receiving an Epstein flash drive. That's fabricated
AI generated hoax. Okay.
Hold on.
Let me check again. I asked a diff
I just wanted to see what it said.
I asked I just refreshed, did a new
one. The post you linked was posted 02/07/2026.
It says the video in that post shows
a bearded man in a suit surrounded by
journalists.
It says the caption attributes the clip to
Keir Starmer. No. It doesn't.
This is, however, it appears to be a
misattribution a a a misattribution.
Keir Starmer is not known to have a
full beard. The clip likely okay. This is
just insane to me. I'm of the mind
that this platform, the Grok, has been like,
it is haywired right now because they're trying
to cover so much stuff up. It's like
we saw with the South African point where
people were asking for the weather and was
telling them South African genocide.
I mean, you could ask the same question
twice, and it's given me three different or
two different answers, and both of them are
wrong. No. It's not Keir Starmer. No. It's
not Steve Bannon. I just find that insane.
And this is always is why we should
not be taking at face value any of
this stuff,
largely, mostly because it can be manipulated by
the person who's in control of it, but
also because it could just be wrong all
the time.
I find that really interesting.
Now, here's what Massey had to say. Fake
news. I don't have a flash drive. Why
make up stuff when the reality itself is
so shocking and disgusting? Right?
Why why do people have to manufacture these
things? I actually think, like and that's the
voice and I brought up the AI point
with the woman in Minnesota. I actually think
it's because it's, you know, it's like a
meta you're trying to create the illusion,
right, that this
is something people will take at face value.
Oh my god. He got a file. But
then if it turns out to be fake,
then you start to doubt all the rest
of what's coming out. Or that you can
make you make you doubt what Massey is
doing. Why isn't he releasing the the file
the drive he has? I'm seeing that all
over Twitter today.
But none of that's true.
I just want you to think about the
the different layers of manipulation and how people
are trying to muddy the waters.
And at that same point, we should be
skeptical of Massey and whether he's got different
intentions.
My my gut is I don't think that's
the case right now. I guess we'll find
out.
But he goes, this is why, too,
and shows that video that we have we've
shown already of him talking about Israel.
So it's funny that it well, it doesn't
matter that you misrepresented him. Oh, there. I
finally got a so I got a fact
check.
There is no such flash drive. Well, what's
funny is that, oh, because you pointed to
something else that shows him talking about Israel,
therefore, it shouldn't matter that I made that
up. That's what you get. You can't just
be like, oops, my mistake, or what that
shows me is deliberate this,
manipulation.
And almost trying to, like, change the way
people logically think about things. It shouldn't matter
about the facts if we end up getting
what we want. It's kind of the ultimate
point there. Here's what Massey said. This is
posted on the seventh in regard to the
Epstein scandal.
Way, I think,
historically, when we look back at the Epstein
scandal, it's gonna be bigger than Watergate,
and it's gonna be who by the way,
the president didn't go to jail. The attorney
general did.
It's gonna be bigger than Iran Contra,
and here's why. It spans
four administrations.
It's deeper
than any,
political
thing on the surface.
And, of course, unfortunately, he's talking to Glenn
Beck when he has this conversation. Somebody who's
actively trying to not have this real conversation,
somebody who's actively trying to drive the country
to war with Iran, then, well, he's the
person who's actively trying you know, it's just
unfortunately, but that's what happens because these people
have big platforms. But at least he's putting
him on. I will say that.
And so I think in terms of the
the number of people who are affected I
mean, how many people were affected by Iran
Contra, okay,
or Watergate? I mean, specifically
in that instance.
Obviously, everybody's affected when there's a lack of
transparency and and bad or fraudulent things happening.
But, I mean, directly affected or implicated,
that that was a finite group of people
in both of those. Here we have
what seems to be almost an infinite number
of people involved with Jeffrey Epstein.
At least we don't even know yet how
many there were in in the criminal
enterprise or the CD part of it.
And,
there's a it's like
that Spider Man meme where there's six Spider
Men, they all look the same and they're
pointing at each other.
You've got all these billionaires pointing at each
other. You're in the f c no. You're
in the f c no. You are in
the f c. It's you who is in
the FC files. And you're the one who
went to the island. I didn't go to
the island. Anyways, there's sort of this circular
finger pointing
Yeah. That's going on.
But I think it's a scandal
that,
is is longer in time,
involve multiple administrations.
Yeah. It's a good point. I mean, clearly,
the effect this could have, it was monumental
because it is long term, and it's not
partisan. You know, if that's but they're so
desperately trying to make it like that. Because
they you they if you think of it
from the position of whoever's, you know, the
the higher level people who want this, it's
not about left and right. You know,
this implicates the entirety of the system. But
if you can manage to pigeonhole make it,
oh, it's only that side. But what that
effectively does is I'm always pointing out is
stop it allows it to not actually be
stopped because it's not the full picture. So
and and so the government doesn't go down.
You know? The the system doesn't go down.
The Epstein network doesn't go down. Whoever's actually
running it doesn't go down. All you do
is frame it on a path to story.
It makes sure it continues.
And that's why people that I'm always pointing
out in the part, the Glenn Beck's and
Alex Jones, they are their job seems to
be to make sure you only blame it
on one side.
Whether they even know that or not, it's
for you to decide. Now here with what
Massey was just saying is exactly what's going
on. I actually
there's a whole thing going on. I I
decided not to bring it in today but,
like, Michael Tracy and plenty of others.
Using what is a valid point, that there
is a lot of subjective
information in these files that cannot be used
other unless there's more to go with it
to make a case in court because they're
subjective.
But there's also very other there's, like I
keep showing you, multiple examples of provable information
that should be investigated.
So when you have Michael Tracey or others
going, you know, there's nothing to go on
here, it makes me question their integrity. It
makes me question what they're really doing there
or whether they can even look into this
properly. But overall,
now you're getting this partisan side of it
for people or people basically going, you know,
why don't you show me where the crimes
are? I don't see any crimes. Like, almost
like, like, blithely,
not shy like, almost like like,
what's the right
word? I get a very juvenile way going
like, why don't you show them where the
crimes are? Well, where are the crimes? You're
talking about the Epstein files. You're talking about
children being abused and women being raped. And
you, the examples I'm thinking of, by the
way, the very two people I'm talking about
were the ones before this administration going, we
have to bring the Epstein files down. Now
they're out there jokingly going, where are the
crimes? Well, because the point is that Trump
doesn't want this to be pointed to. So
now it becomes, well, it's all a bunch
of nothing burger. Don't look at it anymore.
It's just mind blowing, isn't it? And so
here, you have a kind of an extension
of that conversation.
This
print, this is Prince Andrew's former girlfriend, Lady
Victoria, Hervey,
saying
that if you're not in the Epstein files,
you should be embarrassed, essentially. That the cool
people ended up in these files.
Ro Khanna says, this is why I coined
the phrase Epstein class. This is why the
Epstein class needs to go. These people put
but, these people put belonging to a club
of the rich and powerful over speaking out
against pedophiles and the rape of working class
girls.
Well, it wasn't just working class girls, but,
also, just because he's saying this doesn't mean
we shouldn't question and investigate and doubt him
like we do with everybody.
Don't make false accusations. Don't insinuate. But Massey,
Cobra, Kana, we should matter. It should matter
whether or not everybody should be given the
same skepticism is the right way to frame
that. But I'm glad he's making this point,
and I'm glad they're continuing to call it
out. So here's what she says. This might
this is
I honestly can't believe she made this point
this early.
He knew everybody that was very powerful.
So, like, if you were on the scene
and you were powerful, like, to be honest,
like, if you're not in those files,
it would be an insult because it just
means that you were a bit of a
loser.
Right. So the people who aren't in the
files are losers. Yes. Okay.
Are you in the files? Well, of course,
I am because it's it's any journalist that
wrote about it. Well, you see, this is
a very dishonest way to frame that, guys,
because the truth the,
stupid
thing.
It's not you you have well, first of
all, that's not actually true because they redacted
and this is the thing we're gonna get
into in probably one of the next shows,
is they they didn't right now, you have
a a point going around that I just
showed you in the last show about the
the redaction
and about, like, the state department, the sex
the security of state, the the the right
and we need guidance on how to do
this. And I showed you that just yesterday.
It's important. But what if if we're gonna
be accurate, not just try to, you know,
Yes, I hate I don't like the FBI
as well. But if we're gonna be accurate,
what it's saying is we are asking for
guidance on what to do in these situations.
And as far as I can tell, there's
not, like, a response that says, Redact their
names.
So it could be somebody with good intention
in the FBI going, okay. We're not I
I need some direction here. I I why
you know, we need to know who these
are very famous people right now. And what
happened, if you remember correctly, is they were
then told to just redact everyone. There's the
Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, which actually didn't even
happen because they're just either clumsy or that
was by design. But that was the ultimate
outcome. That was a violation of the law,
of the Epstein Act. But it's interesting to
think about because you get then partisans that
come out and goes, this is proof, like
I keep trying to show you. Even though
I do think it's important, that becomes a
a point of contention that makes people ignore
the real stuff.
And the reality is that it matters, and
they were asking for direction, and we can
prove that they did basically redact all these
people's names. But that shouldn't mean that this
is the the point of the email
was walk me through how we cover this
up. Because that's not really what it said.
But it's important.
And so over the the connection here is,
hold on. What was it? The
oh, there's one other point I was gonna
make.
Well, back to her. You know, the interesting
thing here is that she's basically gloating. Right?
Oh, that that's what it was. That, you
know, so you have people's names in there.
Some of them did end up, but the
point was they did redact most everybody's names.
And so not every journalist showed up. Not
everybody's name showed up. So you're almost in
a way trying to turn this and say,
well, you know, it's almost kind of a
nothing thing. Right, everybody? And because that, then
we can act like it's a funny. Then
we can go, oh, well, you you were
cool if you were in the files. You're
getting the most disgusting, sniveling,
groveling, the kind of people that will gravitate
to power at all costs. And they're all
over the mainstream alternative media who wanna just
go, oh, now this is the new thing.
Right? Or
Nick Fuentes.
Epstein's cool.
Like, they've already been doing this. They had
conversations before we even got here about, like,
why Maxwell was a victim. Right? They've they've
been trying to do this, and I just
think it's so obvious. Here she is saying,
if you're not cool if you're in the
files.
I just blown away. I was blown away.
To me, as I keep showing you, I
think that's just desperation. I think somebody's like,
get out there. We need to change the
narrative. We're losing right now. That's what I
think. So Massey points out, oh, important connection,
Howard Lutnick, which we already knew if you've
been paying attention, but this gets even more
important because now the average person is seeing
on full display that somebody who is tied
to the hip of Donald Trump is blatantly
lying about being this involved with Epstein. But
so too is are all the rest of
them, by the way. According to legal documents
and emails, Epstein and Lutnick did business together,
and Lutnick vacationed on his island.
Long after Lutnick claims they parted ways and
long after Epstein was known as a sexual
offender.
Doesn't that matter, guys? Especially to all the
conservatives who can recognize that the Epstein files
are basically beginning to be represented in this
administration?
But I'll I'll start take that as partisan
because you know my opinion if you're watching
the show. It's not partisan. It's all over
the map. It's our government. But right now,
it seems packed with people like this.
I find that pretty crazy.
Here's a clip
of what Howard Lutnick did
when Trump called the Epstein files that we
can see right now that aren't fake when
he called them a hoax. For what? The
third time, I guess?
They they're both very good. Mister president. The
two captains, very good. Mister president, is the
vice president mask hosting a gathering this evening
to talk about how to respond to the
Ukraine situation?
Is he working on what?
Hosting some kind of gathering of top advisers
this evening to talk about how to respond
to the Epstein situation? I don't know. I
could ask you that question.
I don't know of it, but I think,
I I here's the man right here. I
saw it reported today,
and it's completely fake news. We're not meeting
to talk about the Epstein situation,
and I think the reporter, he reported it,
needs to get better sources.
Yeah. Remember, they lied about that.
Wah wah. I mean, it's over and over
and over, guys. Now it's not about the
specific meaning, but the reality was that was
the case, and they did, and they have
been. I mean, this is just what they
do. It's not left and right. They lie,
guys. They lie like they're breathing because they
don't want you to feel like you're on
the inside.
Look. The whole thing is a hoax. It's
put out by the Democrats because we've had
the most successful six months in the history
of our country. That's worthy of laughing at
right there. Not even conservatives think that anymore.
And that's just a way of trying to
divert attention
to something that's total bullshit.
K? When Trump cusses like that,
I think it stands out.
I rarely see him do that, and it
is it I think it show
you could think for yourself. We know where
we are right now. That was not that
long ago.
Are we this ridiculous? Or are we unable?
You know, I I don't think so. I
think most people, conservatives included, are right now
going, wow, man. Like, this is just outrageous.
But Lutnick couldn't stop himself from chuckling the
moment it got brought up. Doesn't that seem
interesting with what we know? I mean, I
think these people are are bent on trying
to create the impression that they couldn't care
less. We're all just a bunch of carefree
people. We're not even involved, and it's just
not true. Everybody can see that. Now, Nick
Dank Memes
says, honestly, if this wasn't the breaking point
for you, I don't really value your opinion
at all.
Trisha Hope, whoever that is, says he this
is they were talking about the,
polls of Trump going down. You know, Again,
polls taken for what you want, but people
I pretty clearly can see people shifting around
this. She says he told his lawyer support
loyal supporters he no longer wanted their support.
We're just giving him what he wants.
And on Nick Dank Meme says if this
tweet, this me or the truth social was
not the the breaking point, I don't value
your opinion. Remember what Trump said. When it
came to the Epstein files,
mentions Russia and fake things. We all know
both sides lie. The media lies. Yes. We
get it. And I agree. Goes on to
say, also, unlike Republicans, they stick together like
glue. Their new scam is what we will
forever call the Epstein Jeffrey Epstein hoax. Oh,
is that what we're gonna forever do? And
my past supporters,
capital past supporters, have brought this into this
b at this bull, s h I t,
hook, line, and sinker, or bought into it.
Excuse me.
So because they so think about the way
he frames that. They bought into this, which
means they're being manipulated.
So they're not choosing to deliberately screw you,
Trump. They're being manipulated by your own statement.
They bought into a manipulation. Right? And then
they're not your supporters anymore because, I mean,
that means you're going, you're not on my
side because you got got manipulated. I mean,
that's just the dumbest. That is because it's
not even what's happening, to be honest. This
is the way he's just trying to scare
and shout people back into place because he
knew he was losing support. It just it
it's it's
it's, what's the word?
I'm trying to think of the term for
blood when it's just gushing out. You know,
it's it's a it's whatever. He's he's clearly
on a rapid pace right now losing people
because it's that obvious.
That's not I don't need to qualify that,
guys. That's very, very clear. In this case,
he continues by calling you past supporters if
you care
that he's lying about that. They haven't learned
their lesson and probably never will, even after
being conned by the lunatic left for eight
long years. So, again, you're saying they're being
played.
So pea but people are tricked. It's not
their that's not a willful decision to go,
you know, it's just
I think it speaks for itself. I have,
he says, had more success in six months
than perhaps any president. No. You haven't, man.
No. You haven't, bud.
All these people want to talk about were
strong prodding by the fake news and the
well, Fox News talked about it too. Right?
Jeffrey Epstein hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward
and do the Democrats' work. Don't even think
about taking all of our incredible unprecedented success
because I don't want their support anymore.
That's what he said. I mean, that's so
childish. It pains me. Like, I'm embarrassed for
him. That's what he's doing out there.
Saying, yeah. You got any more. It's my
ball. I'm going home. That's what it feels
like.
And you're talking about people who acknowledge the
truth of this that you're lying about. And
all it really comes down to is weak
people who will fall for that, who care
more about being in his good graces, his
team, than the truth.
Sad.
And tell me that's not desperate. How is
that not the most desperate thing in the
conversation?
This is pretty funny.
Katherine Austin fits. Just as always, breaking it
down. People tend to hear her arguments that
are about, like, before we had the before
the selection, where she said that she could
argue that Trump might have been the better
pick. Right? And that that we talked about
that. And I even I agreed with her.
But I we both do agree and did
in that interview about the bigger reality of
the two party illusion and how, you know,
And so people tend to hear some of
these arguments and then assume that she's, Trump
supporting right wing. That's what they do. And
so this person invites her on. I haven't
I haven't seen the whole thing.
Catherine Austin Fitz basically tells some podcaster dude
who is apparently still suffering from he he
writes cute hardation.
I think you're just smoking dope if you
think arrests are coming. There's there's a lot
there's I'm gonna let it play through just
so you can listen to it for yourself.
There's a lot of interesting points in here
that I could make, but it's just this
is somebody who clearly still buys the you
know, drinks the Kool Aid. They they believe
there are mass arrests are coming down, like,
from the cue point, like military tribunal, that
the idea is there are all the deep
states going down. I mean, guys, there is
nothing,
nothing to give you that impression. In fact,
there's tons to show the opposite. I know
you all know this. But the fact that
there are still people who would just hold
on to what is genuinely hopium, just blind,
I I really believe it because he said
so.
That's that's Santa Claus territory, guys. That's wild.
Catherine Austin Fitts has none of it. Do
you believe that
the arrests
will happen under Trump? Will we see justice
happen under Trump? Do will we see people
like Bill Clinton,
Obama arrested and brought to justice? And and
in my mind, if we do see that,
is that because
it's just the dark handing the keys off
to the light
optically and that they're gonna give up their
pawns, they're gonna give up they're gonna sacrifice
a few of their deep state players. Do
you think we're gonna see I feel bad
for them. Justice with certain people being arrested?
So let me answer it this way. Trump
was one of Epstein's closest friends.
Howard Letnick was his next door neighbor.
The first lady
was his girlfriend.
So if if you look at the relationships
of the Trump administration to the Epstein files
and if you look at the relationship of
Epstein
to Israel and the Mossad and the and
the president's complete loyalty to Israel,
many would say above and beyond The United
States,
I I think you're just smoking dope
to think that
I I I think hold on. Just hear
me out on this. I think there are
gonna be arrests, but I think it'll be
for the optics. I think it's just so
people can get behind Trump and
and and and cheerlead even more and and
and biz boom rah rah. You know? I
think that they're gonna give up some of
their deep state players.
I think they're gonna be like sacrifices on
the chessboard. Do you get what I'm saying?
So
so chew toy I call them chew toys.
So Fauci's a chew toy. Gates is a
chew toy. They're chew toys. So you give
the dog a chew toy. Right. But,
you know,
Trump has been in power for
a year.
I don't know of one arrest.
I think I think it's possible that they're
coming, and I'm gonna but but I but
like I said something? I gotta tell you.
If you look at the speed that they
can bring up data centers Yep. Yeah.
You know, that was Trump did that day
one.
Yeah. You know, Stargate.
So
It's just nuts, isn't it? I mean, like,
seriously,
some of the chats has apparently got a
huge channel on YouTube. Doesn't surprise me. You
know? It's it's just there's it's look. I'm
you you can have hope, but just be
real. I'm just I'm just blindly hoping into
the wind that this actually happens and I
want it to. Good. That's okay. But
it's it's base you're you're rooting it on
some kind of a logical, you know, like,
what you see in this there's two points
to make. What you see in people doing
this kind of argument where, you know, then
it's it's it's like you're some kind of
political analysis, and it's like, well, the the
chessboard and the deep state, there's no facts
in there. There's nothing logical in there. That's
all just some weird chess analogy to make
the argument that he's gonna secretly do everything
you ever wanted. Other than all the facts
and evidence that do not back that up,
it's frustrating that we even have to engage
with that like that's like that's an honest
argument. I mean, it might it might as
well be this that the aliens will come
and save them from the problem, you know,
which may who knows? Possible. But it's not
there's nothing in any way to go on.
And on top of that, what he did
there at the end is something I deal
with all the time
in in close circumstances as well, where
so you're in this situation and it's very,
very clear that it's pro Trump, MAGA, Q,
whatever it is, like, just all the way,
tribunals,
Trump support, the whole thing. And then when
you get confronted with something that is very
challenging, that is just pure logic,
It shifts into, woah. Woah. Hold on. You
know, I think it could be a move
to, you know, kinda sacrifice that in order
to to, you know the idea being that
it is
I'm kind of suggesting Trump is the bad
guy, but not really the bad guy, but
just not the good we want to be.
But he's gonna do this in order to
pacify us for doing more. But you just
the argument suggests
that they're on the side of covering this
up, but you just laid all this out
of the argument that they're the ones that
are gonna put people into jail.
How can you shift from they'll save us
with arrest and tribunals
to the arrest will pacify us, and And
that may you know, it's just it's so
infuriating. But this is where you got the
sort of, like, we're not Republicans anymore. We're
patriots.
And you have Democrats and RINOs, and then
we're the patriots. It's like, well, that's a
two party illusion. You just jammed over the
other people into the Democrat party, and now
you're still the Patriot Republican side. It's the
same game. But I was at least glad
when I started to see people that were
breaking differentiating from the left right, but it
just became an extension of it. And so
it it all this is how this continues
to go. And all I'm showing trying to
show is there there's this kind of naive
childlike wish that ends up overtaking whole cold,
hard facts in front of us. And as
always, Catherine is has no patience for that.
That's why I love her for it. Well,
let's continue. Only a few more points to
show you.
And that's night wait Night Watch Nate, by
the way. He's in the chat. He's the
one that shared that, so check him out.
Jason Bachelor says, just to include these, just
any put a few points before he shows
about stuff about Iran, just last four points
on that. Basler says something important that doesn't
get brought up enough, at least not in
the mainstream conversation. Epstein's most disturbing property wasn't
the island.
It was Zorro Ranch, 7,500
acres in New Mexico on public land. Let's
not forget the weird New Mexico overlapping conversations.
Leased for $200
a year. It has a private airstrip, underground
tunnels and rooms, and a six foot nude
portrait of Maxwell on a gold dagger. Victims
testified abuse happened there.
So there is testimony,
subjective or not, because it's they're they're claiming
that they were abused there, which would mean
that they should investigate that further. The ranch
was never raided.
The investigation stalled.
Quietly sold through shell companies, not a ranch,
a crime scene hiding in plain sight.
These kind of points cannot be denied. Look
into this for yourself. Please do. Don't take
face value with text on Twitter. He's right,
though. And what does that show you? Not
Biden, not Trump, nobody.
And this is not about Epstein at this
point. It is, especially if you wanna
genuinely look into the reality of what you
know, what the the
the unknown
the unanswered questions to what actually happened to
him.
But whether dead or not, the point is
this is much bigger than Jeffrey Epstein.
Right? By the way, on a side note
too, there's a lot going around
about whether he was seen
that's been happening over the years. We shouldn't
ignore it. But the you know, Twitter called
it an AI image, but maybe that's covering
it up. You know? It's it's just there's
so much noise. It's hard to know, but
we should never dismiss. Consider. Question. But on
top of that, though, there's a Fortnite point
that came out. People are saying that,
Jeffrey Epstein's tag,
like, little Saint James Jeff or something like
that, was being used on Fortnite.
And turns out it was. Except,
at least as the story goes, it's and
even for even,
Fortnite and others and, like, check fact checks,
and it came out right away. And we're
like, no. It turns out it was a
user who played a joke and saw it
in the files and changed his name to
meet that. But I bet you someone out
there who has more, you know, in-depth investigation
in regard to this platform
could find out whether it was, in fact,
the old one versus the new one. I
would I'd be interested in that. But as
it stands, it seems the story was quickly
rushed out that it was, oh my god.
We found him. He's using this Fortnite in
conjunction with here's this picture where somebody found,
and now it's been watered down a bit.
Look into it. I probably will even more
just because I haven't I've I've looked into
it today, but I haven't gone too deep
on it. I will just just just try
to flush it out. Just be skeptical, guys.
There's a lot of stuff going on out
there. And as I keep saying, even if
that turns out to be true, we don't
need it. If it's real, we should want
it, but we don't need in the sense
of investigation, but we don't need it. You
have enough evidence right now to put all
these people in jail. It's don't miss the
forest for the trees. It's always what happens.
And I already see it happening right now.
In regard to the Israel overlap, one post
going underground, always doing a good job on
this, talking with former Israeli intelligence officer,
Ari Ben, Menashe.
Here's what he has to say about the
Russian allegation, which you guys already know. But
from an Israeli, former Israeli intelligence, it's interesting
to see what he says about this. Because
if you haven't seen the entirety of the
western media and a lot of the mainstream
alternative are like, Epstein was a Russian spy.
Can't you tell by all the evidence of
connection to Israel? Clearly a Russian spy. But
as I said, there is a Russian overlap.
There's a connection there. But it's one piece
versus a thousand, and you're making it about
that. It seems like a clear
deviation
or rather deflection.
You may have noticed,
maybe even where you are in Canada, they're
trying to pin, Putin to blame for Jeffrey
Epstein, as regards the
information that's come out, these 3,000,000 documents. You
contend that there is a Russian angle as
well as an Israeli angle, but, it's not
exactly Vladimir Putin.
No. Well, the Israelis
did work,
with the Russians
going back actually to Soviet days, going back
to the eighties.
Yes?
And, for that.
But
this,
calling
Epstein an, Russian or a Soviet agent is
nonsense.
I mean, they're trying to cover up.
It's a cover up. Yeah. Poland
to cover up for.
Poland's prime minister, Donald Tusk. He just said
it is,
Russia. That, of course, is Poland that didn't
enforce the ICC warrant on, Netanyahu.
Sure.
Sure. I mean, I don't know which, Maybe
it's
Yeah. Who's doing the cover up?
I'm sure the Israelis are putting it out
that he's a Russian agent. He was a
Russian agent.
Now to be objective and be clear, that
was his opinion. I think that was obvious,
but in case that wasn't clear on podcast
that he was his opinion is that it
was Israel putting it out. But it's just
it's it's embarrassing to make that argument.
Obviously, it's a possibility.
But like I said, you have a few
connections here, and you've got a lifetime of
obvious on the record over I mean, everybody
from his from Maxwell's father to Maxwell himself
to all these different connections
directly to Mossad and on top of the
things you could read in his own emails.
It just seems like an obvious deflection.
And on the note of Netanyahu
well, guess what? He's on his way back
to Washington, guys, because that's the way this
works. The the the the president of The
United States is about to meet with Donald
Trump. Guys, here it comes. And the frustrating
part of this is it happens constantly while
they're committing genocide, and while it is this
man is quite literally a yin international
war criminal. He by law of the international
community, he is supposed to be arrested by
anybody
involved with the international community, like The United
States, with the ICC and ICJ. And
nope. They're gonna let him walk right back
in. What is this actually, I'll I'll end
with a clip from Rand, Ron Paul that
talks about this very point and overlaps with
Ron in regard to how many times he's
met with Netanyahu.
But let's finish quickly with some points about
Ron, as I said, just to keep this
in your mind because I'm not gonna get
into it in-depth here, but it is building.
And I've given you some some stuff to
think on in the last so many shows.
But as John Hoffman writes, and this is
where it's at right now, he says, United
States is steamrolling toward another Middle East crisis
in its of its own making. And he
says, negotiations between Iran, this is on the
fourth, and and The US scheduled for Friday,
that was yesterday,
are now reportedly canceled
because spoilers in Washington and Israel pushed the
same poison pills that led to the twelve
day war. And, by the way, the same
thing they do in every single example that
is easy to prove
Unless you just take the narrative of the
Zionist community genocide and the US government that
lies to you every day. The truth is
you could prove a 100 times over that
they deliberately sabotage these deals. Let's be clear.
Israeli
politicians
have publicly said that Netanyahu has continually
sabotaged the deal. His own people protest against
him for doing that, and yet we can't
have an honest conversation about that in this
country. Seems to me that shows you which
place is more compromised than anywhere else. The
truth is that they've already been trying to
blow this up. And, of course, then what
you get right now is the totally pro
US America first, Patrick Beck David, that says
Iran has zero intention of negotiating. Here's the
playbook.
Stall until
domestic protests fade and the regime stabilizes. Stall
until Trump is out. Quietly continue advancing his
nuclear program. God, this guy just increasingly shows
his ignorance in the conversation or his deliberate
dishonesty because the truth is
your lie the the lie about the entire
thing, it's built like, just quickly.
I I was I was gonna show it
after, but let's not forget. This got exposed
by what is it? It was Italian media.
Fake accounts, likes of the Shah of Iran.
What was it? It's right here. Eight almost
almost a billion tweets
coming from fake accounts. They can prove our
fake accounts that were supposed they were astroturfing
to make you think the Shah was popular.
It's just so very obvious.
The protests themselves were proven, as I've shown
you many times over, to be
brushed full with foreign actors who were provably,
admittedly armed by Israeli Mossad.
The air their media promoted this. They armed
the protesters, which makes them not protesters anymore,
and they weren't Iranian protesters.
A 100 I mean or the fact that
the,
Mossad as well as Netanyahu, excuse
me, Pompeo
openly told you that they were on the
street alongside them. This has always been a
regime change. And if, like, we can't look
at the last seven times they tried it
and make sense, it's just willful ignorance,
guys. But then,
start until Trump is out. Oh, of course,
because the Democrats won't let it all happen.
You mean aside from the exact opposite? You
mean aside from Biden and Trump having the
same policy against Iran? These people are either
so bad at what they do or they're
make misleading you for their partisan game.
Delay isn't diplomacy and strategy. Okay. Well, as
Gerald Solante points out, somebody you should very
much listen to more than Patrick Bet David,
never trust the IRCG, the Iranian military. While
it was the Trump administration that pretended to
be sincere about negotiations
so Israel could carry out a sneak attack
in June.
Keep selling the BS. That's exactly what happened.
I told you that last time. They pretended.
You can look at it one of two
ways. Trump either pretended in order to let
them do that, or Trump was played and
thought they were negotiating in Israel attack anyway,
and then he still didn't tell you that,
which shows you what's really going on. But
you have to understand, we know this happened.
This has been publicly admitted. So right now,
the question is, is he doing it again?
But but Patrick McDavid, Mark Levin, they're like,
go after bomb them attack because that's, you
know, a a major world war is not
a big deal. Right?
For what end? What's America first about this,
Mark? How is this in the interest of
Americans? You mean because of all the lies
you spin about what Iran is doing? I
mean, it just it's incessant, guys. And they're
lying to you on the record in every
possible way about what's actually happening. To put
back the crown prince because
that's democracy?
Was
he voted? Was he elected? Did they want
that? No. None of that. None.
But democracy, because the Shah's son,
by blood, should be in power.
They just don't care anymore, guys. Now I'll
include this show discussing that if you wanna
watch it, massive astroturfing of Iran protests exposed,
and I will leave you with Ron Paul
continuing to this very day to break it
all down for you, to expose the reality
of the of the illusion of our I
mean, of everything. I actually believe right now
that both Daniel McAdams and Ron Paul are,
you know, not just right now, for a
long time. I respect them both immensely, but
are continuing just like we all should day
by day to expand and ungrow in their
understanding of how dark
and broken this really is right now. And
that's not an that's not a suggestion of
that we're screwed, it's all bad. It's the
quite the opposite. It's that it's becoming so
obvious and so outlined because we are beginning
to chip it away.
I'm convinced of that.
But don't take my word for it. Question
it. Research this. Look at the source material
and understand that you can prove it to
yourself if you just want to. Now I
mean prove it. And I rarely use that
term. I never use it frivolously.
Not just evidence and suggestion, but prove that
they're lying to you if you really wanted
to with most of the points you made
today.
American conservative, Ron Paul, questions Netanyahu's sixth meeting
with president Trump. I believe it's more than
that when you include ones that weren't in
upset meeting. But overall,
how does that not show you what's going
on? When somebody like Ron Paul is willing
to stand up and make this case, we
need to understand how bad and obvious it
really is. Time to wake up, guys. Thank
you for tuning in today. Appreciate all your
support.
Possibly, actually, show it tomorrow. My I'm really
I'm really just, you know, going at it
right now. It's important to me that we
not just continue to do the work,
but the continuity. Like, I wanna get to
a place to where we maybe even we
I can, you know, the the for I
don't get into my personal life all that
much, but just what I deal with around
it, family and and, you know, obligations I
have with my family and so on. The
point for me
is that it's
it can be difficult to
do a show and then continually do them
because the research I do pretty much takes
all day and it just becomes like a
week long process.
But it's important to me to do that
regardless of how,
how much commitment it takes. Because if we
continue the day to day, like, it allows
you us to get like, it's almost we're
having a day to day conversation. Right? Our
this is continuing from yesterday. Now it'll continue
to tomorrow, and we'll continue to connect these
dots. And I think that reaches so much
more. So I'm just just being honest about
this for you guys. I know you're all
here because you believe in this, right?
But more coming your way as always.
But if we don't, make sure we're getting
the clips out there, information. You know, like,
if you guys wanna make these clips, I'm
telling everybody, tag me, we'll share them. Right?
Cut off a piece you think is important,
get that some reach. But as always, thank
you for being here. Couldn't do this without
you. You are the last American Vagabond. I
love you all. As always, question everything. Come
to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Nope. I almost did it again. Sorry for
doing that last time.
I see Orwell glaring at me right now.
Here's the video we're gonna end with. Thank
you for being here. Media is reporting that
Israeli prime minister, Benton
Netanyahu,
will make yet another trip to Washington,
his sixth in one year,
where he is expected to again
pressure president Trump to launch a war on
Iran.
Last time,
he was in The US in December. The
regime change protests in Iran were launched.
What does he have up his sleeve
this time?
How can it be
that a foreign leader has more say on
whether we go to war than the US
Congress?
Here's what we do know.
Whether Trump launches a war or not, the
massive military buildup in The Middle East has
already cost us
billions of dollars.
Those are billions that instead of helping
to actually make America great again,
will only make the military industrial
complex greater.
All the American people will see is the
continuing destruction
of the dollar. And with it, more inflation
and a lower standard of living at home.
And, of course,
we will see a war supplemental spending bill
on top of the trillion dollar military budget
for the year.
Thanks for listening.