From the President's Office in the White House
in Washington DC, we present an address by
the president of The United States, Dwight D
Eisenhower.
In holding scientific
research and discovery in respect,
as we should,
we must also be alert to the equal
and opposite danger
that public policy
could itself
become the captive of a scientific
technological
elite.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Saturday, 01/31/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Obviously, a lot to discuss around the Epstein
files that we're gonna be going into today.
But some things I wanna start with that
I think are relevant to kinda set the
table. We're gonna discuss, obviously,
the the important revelations that I think the
few that we're gonna get into. There's so
much to talk about. And there as we
said yesterday, there will be more coming out.
There there are people out there that not
not all of us can focus all time
on the one thing that are gonna be
diving through this over the next so many
days. More will be coming out. If you
have something out there, reach out to us.
But there's a lot that's coming out that
really doesn't change the story all that much
if you've been paying attention.
But one thing I wanna connect is, well,
obviously, just the cover ups that are ongoing.
This has not changed, but what's coming out
like, around Elon Musk, for example, as much
as I don't think it shocks many people
who are truly paying attention, examples like him
you know? And this is ultimately a benign
point in the larger scheme of what the
Epstein files are showing. But that Epstein or
rather Musk claiming that he refused or rather
the the the kind of giving him the,
tour of his his facility and you know?
And the point is these things are coming
out showing a lie. Now you could argue
it's simply just him lying because he knew
it would look bad. That's certainly possible, but
it's also still a lie. And I think
you're seeing a lot of this stuff continue
to be shown where either small examples or
very large ones like we discussed yesterday, which
we'll go over again,
to be
like, there's no part in this conversation where
you can ignore that this was an effort
to hide this from you. But as we
said yesterday, that doesn't necessarily mean that there's
crimes they committed, more possibly just that they
thought you would see it that way. Either
way, there are coverups going on. And on
top of that, we do have evidence these
people are involved in a lot of different
things. And the partisanship is what gets in
the way of all this. One thing that
I found going through this is which, again,
is not new in the context of Palantir
or Peter Thiel. His connections to this had
been clear for a long time.
But an interesting connection to the new the
new, files that have come out, at least
new to me, again, some of this stuff
has been released and not everyone's seen it
and then it goes for all of us.
There's so much out there. But ultimately, a
connection to what I'm paying attention to, something
that I am looking for, And that is
the overarching,
larger agenda of the network state, kind of
great reset
reimagining of the way our society operates.
The seasteading movement is something p Jeffrey Epstein
personally comments on more than once in conversations
about Peter Thiel and investing and where that
may go. The Somalians come up in that
conversation. A lot of different interesting overlaps. Now
these are just points that I think are
relevant to the thing that I already think
I've highlighted more than enough is concerning and
that we should be calling out and that
we should be
further investigating.
This to me just adds another connection to
what we've all been paying attention to as
this larger kind of, you know, I whether
you wanna call it an intelligence apparatus, it
that is part of this or, you know,
however you frame this. It's clearly a driving
force behind a lot of very large agendas,
foreign policy,
domestic policy, larger sort of overtaking regime change
type policy.
So I wanna highlight why I think that's
important. And we'll go over, some starting points
today from foreign policy that I didn't want
you to miss, updates on Iran,
Israel, and a few others. The bulk of
today will be discussing the Epstein files and
what we're seeing in this. And I wanna
make two points to start. One, that it's
interesting. You know, this is coming out during
Trump's administration.
So to some degree, there is a it's
important that we acknowledge that's because of Trump's
administration.
But what's interesting to me around that is
that this
does not feel like a
here, we're revealing this to you. Hard to
call it transparent when you've been caught lying
so many times and pretend that it was
there, that it's not, it's a hoax, and
all of this stuff. But all of it
aside, it still did come out under Trump,
and that is worth pointing out. But I
think it's more of a desperate move with
how much is being seen, and you know
my opinion about all of the government in
the larger agenda. But I do think the
credit where it's due, this all of this
has come out under Trump. But you know
my opinion on why. I also wanna point
out the Jeffrey Epstein point before we start
that, as Whitney's covered, her and I have
had multiple discussions over the years. Her work
before even talking to me on this has
been very clear, but her and I have
had discussions through T Lab multiple times about
Jeffrey Epstein, connections to different types of academic
areas, Stanford, Harvard, but more so specifically around
the genetic,
you know, the eugenics,
genetic engineering, and these kind of weird scientific
technocratic
directions, transhumanist
directions, and what it was connected to and
how alarming some of this stuff was. Charles
Lieber, for example, the connections to the larger
COVID nineteen discussion even through Trump. But what
I want you to think about as we
go through today is the is the very
clear connection to all of these kind of
larger
technocratic agendas that Epstein,
you could argue, was either interested in,
invested in, which those are very clear. But
more so, you could also consider that it
more might have been something he was in
a large way in in some way or
another,
orchestrating or at least
driving.
Not to say the only part in all
of that. The only reason I'm bringing this
up is because it's interesting to think about
whether it's just the network state part or
any other element of all this. You can
stand back and see this nebulous kind of
background, globalist,
technocratic, whatever you wanna call it, and, you
you know, structure
that seems to be having its fingers in
damn near everything we can point to, whether
it's regime change, whether it's internal policy, whether
it's Trump's election.
And I think most people, Americans right now,
are starting to become,
uncomfortably aware of what that is. You can
call it a deep state. You can call
it whatever you want. People disagree on all
these things. But it's clearly an unelected power
structure that has this kind of influence. So
when we get into the part, it'll be
the latter part of the show today, around
the network state connection to it, just recognize
that there's very clear element evidence, excuse me,
of Epstein
investing in this very direction,
and he's just one part of what that
is, which very much ties back to Israel,
also ties back to the CIA, ties back
to a lot of things. So keep that
in mind as we go through all this
today. Thank you, Victis, for the donation out
of the gate. So let's start
with a quick shout out to, Derek Bros
continuing his,
People's Reset. It is ongoing still today. Make
sure you check it out. Make sure you
support it. There's just really amazing stuff happening
there that I want you guys to check
out, workshops and discussions. And, you know, this
is where people get together and discuss new
ideas and challenge each other's ideas the way
it should be operating. So check it out.
I'll be continuing to promote this. Make sure
you guys support what he's doing, both the
T Lab and the Conscious Resistance.
I wanna start with some foreign policy points.
Now this is interesting to me because we've
been talking about Venezuela and and and Delsey
Rodriguez and and the what the concern, rather,
the the questioning about whether or not how
that really went down. Was she involved? Was
this her
doing what she thought was best for the
people of Venezuela? You know, working with them
when they know if you don't, you're gonna
you know, it's who knows? It's hard to
tell right now.
But I the only two ways I see
this now with what's been happening. We showed
you the discussions,
I don't know, a week ago or less,
or she was already, you know, becoming very
amenable to the oil companies and working with
the US government. And so, okay. Right there,
I that's what I was waiting for.
And you can either argue that that was
the plan, that she was the reason this
all happened and sold Maduro out or however
you look at that. Because remember, there were
talks that have been on the record now
after the fact that Maduro was working, discussing
with the US government about maybe going into
exile and allowing this to happen. That was
before what what happened to Maduro, then we
saw what happened to him. Now and and
who knows where he's at now? He could
be in some Caribbean island for all we
know. I mean, who knows? Because there's more
behind this clearly.
Xi takes power
even though they were leaning in with Gonzales
and Machado, and that doesn't make much sense
from the narrative other than they don't really
care who's in power, as always. They want
what they want. And so it shows you
that she was willing to work with them.
But it doesn't have to mean that she
was behind or
sold out the people of Venezuela.
But as we stand now, it's clear to
me that this is how it's gonna go
forward, and that makes me upset.
Now this is a,
I I think it's a news related account
in a translation from, Spanish discussion. Delcio Rodriguez
announces a general amnesty law for hundreds of
prisoners in Venezuela. Now this is something you
can look at it's being broadly discussed. What
I think is interesting about this, two things.
Well, finishing what she says. During an event
at the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, Rodriguez requested
that the text be discussed in the National
Assembly to promote coexistence in Venezuela.
And it goes on to say, I ask
that everyone,
that no one impose violence or revenge so
that we can all live with respect and
decision that would never have taken place without
pressure from The United States. That's what she
said. So, you know, it it's interesting. That's
a double edged sword in a way. Right?
You could argue it's like, well, good. We're
gonna release these people that in many cases,
people are arguing our political prisoners, and that's
because they pressured it. But at the same
time,
didn't we just get done hearing from Trump
about them dumping their prisons and people and
migrants and so on? I get a weird
sense that this is gonna develop into like,
last time with the migrant crisis and then
the the migrant whatever they this call I
forget the the term they used, but coming
from Venezuela.
It's amazing how many people just ignored the
fact that right before that, Trump's policy, Rubio's
policy created
a lot of that, most of that, in
fact. And then they pointed to it and
blamed everything else. And this is how this
tends to go. Sort of like a lot
of people are starting to see right now,
left and right, play you guys against each
other, rather all of us against each other.
That's how this works. And so in this
kind of moment moment, you could recognize at
least see the potential for another building element
like that. But who knows? Maybe it's only
gonna be 10 people. It would make a
difference. But
I think it's important to recognize that at
the first point that I think that this
is not a good signal for
independent Venezuelan, you know, autonomy because if The
US is straight up dictating policy, which is
what they basically said, then they've lost control
of that place. But it says, the measure
proposes to grant amnesty and to erase the
files and charges of those released, in in
other words, to grant full freedom, much broader
pardon than the releases that have occurred since
January 8 in which the liberated individuals remain
subject to precautionary measures such as the prohibition
on leaving country and making statements to the
media.
This other person responded saying, but she doesn't
take orders. Yesterday, Rubio said this.
They were releasing political prisoners, but not at
the pace he would like, and then this
comes out. So what they're pointing to from
the their Venezuelan perspective is that ultimately this
is
Venezuela just doing what they're told by the
US government. Now that's perspective.
Look at it from what you know, investigate
it for yourself, come to your conclusions. But
I just think it's interesting how this is
going in the regard to the migration discussion,
the prison's point that he was just making.
Just feels strange to me. Now I wanted
to include that to start, but more, I'm
sure, will come about with Venezuela. But let's
realize that's on the back that's the that's
in their minds, they've succeeded. That's over in
a lot of ways, other than how they're
gonna now profiteer in the location. So I
doubt we're gonna get a lot of focus
on it from the media. Now onto Iran,
which is clearly and, again,
we're gonna briefly talk about foreign policy here,
but don't don't miss how all of these
country conversations right now, all of these are
interconnected,
at the very least because they tell you
that. Because Iran's working with Venezuela and Hezbollah's
over there, and almost all of this is
about the framing. And the reality is to
see a larger global militarized agenda, which has
been going on for quite a long time.
But it's not some isolated thing. This is
a globalist agenda. And I mean that from
the actual definition of that word, not some,
you know, what do you mean by that
abstract, ne partisan narrative? The actual definition is
what I mean. US military tells key mil
Middle East ally to prepare for attack on
Iran.
So here we are again.
Rather, here we never left because this has
never stopped going despite who was in the
presidency.
And it's always been for Israel. That's become
so common. I mean, that's basically a normal
talking point now in the corporate media.
Because it is, guys. Let's be real about
this. And so what's crazy is that now
this is happening. Right? This is what's going
on now with all that's been coming out.
I mean, very look. I'm I'm never the
one to think it's always just about deflection
or distraction. But that's never a point you
should ignore.
And what I think is important is that
what does Bibi Netanyahu, what does he do?
I mean and there's thousands of articles written
about this from Israeli media, from people in
Israel. What does he do almost every time
he finds himself in a position where he
might lose power? He starts a war. He
bombs things. He creates conflict, and it works
for him. Even they'll admit that, even though
they hate him. And so in the same
point, let's start to question whether that might
be basically what we're seeing.
No other option? Start bombing things, and people
distract. Right? So and that's all that's not
to say that this is a wag the
dog situation or it's not real or that
it's a this is very real. You're just
basically hitting killing two birds with one stone.
Bomb Iran for Israel. It also helps distract
from my problems in the country right now.
But, also, they have a very real agenda
to overthrow Iran aside from all of that.
All this is before not even to get
too deep in it. It's just to just
highlight that this is now being stated yet
again. It says in addition to military targets,
Trump is considering strikes on senior Iranian leaders
with the aim of spurring the overthrow of
the Iranian government.
So so, so coming from US military people,
personnel.
But this is not new. This has been
the same kind constant over you know, from
Bolton to you know, really from Bush to
Obama to every president I've seen in my
lifetime.
Basically putting forward the similar narrative, but, you
know, ebbing and flowing. Some parts, it gets
quiet. Some parts, it's all ramped up and
fire and brimstone and protesters being killed. And
it kinds of goes in the same old
cycle. Just recognize that it is going forward
now. Here's what he recently said.
We have a,
large armada
flotilla.
Go whatever you want heading. That was meant
to be a slight, just so we're clear
on that. Flotilla like the people going to
call out Israel's starvation.
You could even see the waist mouth about
it. Not that that's important for this point,
but it's just disgusting.
Flotilla,
go out whatever you want. Heading
toward Iran right now,
even larger than what we had in Venezuela.
It's still in front of Venezuela. The Venezuelan
So just to hear that he's telling you,
we we have a floatail or or, excuse
me, a an errata
heading towards
Iran.
Oh, that's weird.
Here it
is. And just in case you haven't heard
of it, please check out the Freedom Flotilla
and and and what it is and what
they're doing.
And they've been trying well before October 7
to call out what the, you know, the
ongoing human rights violations and starvation that's been
happening to Gaza for a very long time.
That's why he made that point. But
in, in Israel, and this has been the
same thing, and I've I mean, my entire
career I've been calling this out, but recently
a lot more than usual,
where they're telling you the quiet part out
loud. In Israel saying, we have agents in
Iran on the ground and they're working with
Assad. I mean, it's pretty blatant.
So on top of that, Monitor X shares
this Israel channel twelve interview, an Iranian Mossad
mercenary named Arash who it's both it's it's
mostly subtitles, but there's some English in it
too. So it's you could check it out
if you wanna listen to it. Most of
it's in subtitles and and Hebrew, so it's
worth just relaying for yourself. And you can
look it up from twelve channel twelve news.
It says,
who was in Tehran during the twelve day
war, which is what they call the last
the last back and forth between Iran, Israel,
and United States, and his team was responsible
to hit defense system launchers and military equipment.
Now let's be clear. Regardless of whether you
take this face value, which you should always
question it,
They have openly admitted this in many different
examples from the Israeli side of this. Now,
of course, you could argue it's them gloating
and trying to frame it the way they
want you to see it, but it's starting
to feel and I think I this is
what I originally felt made the most sense.
And then talking to people like Robert Inlakash
and Vanessa Bailey, and it's this it's the
same sentiment that ultimately they had long planned
with different assets inside of Iran
waiting for this moment. And they were ready
to destroy these things. I mean, this you
in a
let's just say you're in the midst of
a declared legal war.
Having this kind of thing happen would be
would be within the bounds of war if
you're not killing civilians, if you're not, you
know, and all the same old stuff. But
they're not declared war. They're not at this
location. And, yes, there's always intelligence and we
can act like somehow the CIA secretly doing
things that are black book and off you
know, illegal, mind you, are somehow okay because
we're the good guy. I don't know how
that Hollywood is how that happened.
The truth is, the breaking the law matters.
And doing this was breaking the law. Whether
or not you think Iran bad guy. Whether
or not you think that they were the
ones who started it. You know, it's the
same thing we're dealing with this country right
now. You can make all the arguments you
want about why they're wrong and they're the
bad guy and blah blah blah. Okay. Maybe
you're right.
But then you the last part shouldn't be,
and this is why we ignore that they
broke the law too. Right? That just shows
a lack of principle. Right? The point is
you could argue so and so and they
deserved it or they brought you know, they
brought whatever the argument would be, but at
the end of the day, you have to
acknowledge that they're doing the same thing in
reverse. The only difference would be that you
choose to be on their side. It's just
so frustrating how this works today, but I,
above the mind, it's a diminishing smaller and
smaller and smaller minority today that is falling
for that. He continues. He mentioned that there
were several such small teams across the country
who destroyed radars, defense systems,
and ATGM launchers, and FPV drones at the
same time minutes before the start of the
war while dressing in disguise as civilians. See,
and this gets even more of a criminal.
This is like them dressing up like Palestinians
going in hospitals and shooting people. Because remember,
a lot of civilians died with these these
actions after they bombed these locations. He mentions
that there was also women in other teams
as well as some leaders who were a
woman. Such teams were also reportedly present during
the recent violent riots in Iran according to
their media. So I'm telling you right now
that they're already stoking these while the western
media is pretending like it's all protesters fighting
for freedom.
Always how this goes, guys, and they're brazenly
bragging about this in the media under Israel.
This is always how this goes. Now interestingly,
completely taking it at at you know, with
a massive grain of salt.
I rarely go into things like this because
it's completely unverifiable.
And I tend to only want to engage
with things that are at somewhat you know,
have some kind of a base to it.
This was interesting only because it's and you
guys have all seen the 4chan stuff. And
many, many times over the years, these things
have turned out to be correct. But the
problem is you never know until after the
fact. And that's why I tend to not
even get into it. The reason I wanna
talk about this is because this is interesting
from a specific level that I think, one,
I personally have been worried about the escalation
of this because for a very long time,
Israel's been driving this to a very alarming
degree. But today, I've never seen Israel more
vulnerable. I've never seen the Israeli government more
at a precipice of their own possible destruction,
and we know the Samson option. If you
don't, this is their documented plan. I think
it was Seymour Hersh who actually broke this
down in a book. Their documented plan,
if they're at threat to be destroyed, that
they will launch nuclear weapons at everybody.
One of the main reasons why they try
to keep the idea that they have them
off the record even though everybody knows that,
in my opinion, anyway. So my point here
is that at this point in time, when
they are that vulnerable,
I tend to think this makes sense. My
point I was thinking something like this whether
I even saw this or not, that this
might be a moment in which Israel desperately
tries to drive this agenda, even just like
I said to start with where we're at,
because they need you to look anywhere else.
And even if you knew that they orchestrated
something, which I'm about to read for you
as a as a thought,
if it kicked off this large, I'm willing
to bet you even those that were skeptical
of how it started would be pulled into
the covering of the chaos. And that's something
that's what you would call a desperate last
effort, that last, you know, last ditch effort,
whatever you wanna frame it as. So let
me read this for you first. Remember, this
is completely anonymous, posted on 4chan, and it
can just as easily be nonsense as it
can be insightful from some intelligence person that
goes on there and posts it. Right? Of
course, with an image of the CIA, which
makes it, you know, who knows? But all
that aside, it's just an idea. Think about
what this person puts forward. Iran is going
to get nuked, they write. This is on
today this was on, yesterday I posted this.
The Israelis have over 200 nuclear weapons.
And about and, again, there's disputes,
but I'm willing to bet you it's much
more than that. And about four will do
the job, they write.
One for the mullahs and one for Kharg
Island, one for Tehran, although that might be
a demonstration,
a demonstration blast in the desert near Tehran,
and one for the missile complex as housing
Iranian missile forces. It says, you see after
the massacres in Iran, Israel has finally come
to the conclusion that either the mullahs go
in the oven or Israel goes in the
oven. You know, the idea that after you
see the massacres in is in Iran, you
know, it gives you an insight into the
frame the way the person sees the meteor
porting. Now we've gone over this. I'm not
gonna go into all again the idea of
the the the very, very, very clear lies
that are being spun about what they claim
is happening.
Wouldn't surprise me if Iran was shooting people
unjustly. That's happened in the past. All governments
I know of have done this in the
past. My point is that I don't believe
I think you can prove that the groups
they're dealing with are masked foreign elements that
are even being called out by the people
protesting who are allegedly the ones being shot
by the Iranian government. You can't you can
prove this stuff for yourself.
So thinking about that framing, it doesn't mean
they're dishonest. It just means that in some
way, in my opinion, they're leaning into the
framing of the corporate media. Now it says
Israel has finally come to a conclusion that
either oh, and last point was the numbers
they're putting forward. Guys, this stems back from
very clear Israel Israeli
floated numbers that go through Israeli manipulated media
like Ellison. See, that the conversation of Barry
Weiss, and that's where this actually came from
in the beginning.
And ever since then, it's just been this
repeated narrative coming from unvetted sources that claim
they know from inside. It's Israel. And most
of these tend to be the Israeli Zionist
influencers on Twitter right now. Anyway, question it
is the point. Israel has finally come to
the conclusion that,
that that one or the other have to
go. And they have decided it will be
the mullahs. It is the leadership of Iran.
It is more of the religious leadership. It
says it is the only choice and it
is wise because Israel knows eventually Iran will
get the upper hand and wipe out Israel,
so they're going first. And which makes sense.
Right now, Israel has lost the information war.
They lost this a month into post October
7 lies.
But right now, it's becoming more and more
obvious. And at what point does Iran choose
to take advantage of that? It's a good
point. It says, in my previous post, I
discussed the logic of this and why it
is the only way.
Expect a false flag attack on Israel followed
by a massive strike. The mullahs have been
given thirty six hours
to go into exile.
This was posted yesterday. So it's an interesting
timeline. One of the other reasons why I
thought it's worth just looking so if this
comes to pass, right, if we go thirty
six hours and something happens, suddenly this becomes,
you know, who was this person? What do
they know? Why it's interesting. But it says,
and I suspect they will not go. It
will happen when
it cools in the next few days. My
bet is Sunday. The American military will play
a small role, and it will be used
primarily to protect the Gulf Arab states. When
the Molas are nuked, the night sky in
Iran will burn like a medieval hellhole.
Cheers, he says, saying it very clear opinion.
Just remember the mullahs had always planned
to to use tactical nukes on Israel, you
know, aside from them not having nuclear weapons
according to literally everybody. But, you know, that
could be a lie. But I care about
evidence. And from my perspective, all you have
is a bunch of never ending lies from
people who constantly get proven to be lying
about this topic,
and then a lot of evidence showing they
don't, and people in the US government telling
you they don't. So what point do you
realize all we have is a lot enough
a very clear evidence of people lying to
you about it and no evidence to point
to that it being there other than those
people telling you that? That doesn't mean they're
not there. It just means that you need
to start being objective about the body of
evidence that's in front of you and saying
that is they have nukes right now is
a baseless statement in every possible meaning of
that word. And it says, and recently, Israel
intelligence got their hands on specifics and what
they plan to do.
So this very well could be somebody who
is on the side of Israel, or it
could be a Mossad agent for all we
know, trying to set a narrative for us
to frame it a certain way before it
happens.
It's hard to say. You could guess a
lot of different directions. Oh, we'll have to
wait and see what happens at thirty six
hours. But the idea of creating an event
is what I've been worried about for a
while that use is used to justify
the larger response.
And then as it all bull rushes forward,
by the time you get to the end
of it, it's so muddied in all the
things that happened since that, you know, it's
it's like any number of these situations. It's
like Lahaina. It's like East Palestine. It's like
what's going on in Gaza, except that's more
hard difficult for them because the entire world
is paying attention. But realize that these things
get pushed down the line and slow. And
then by the way, you look back, it's
like, oh, what was that we were talking
about in the beginning? Oh, it's too late
now. It's bit spread into 75 different conversations.
It's by design, guys. So the idea that
an event might drive that, I don't think
is that far fetched. So keep this in
mind. Now drop site news reports,
the Trump administration has moved to push through
more than $6,000,000,000
in new arm sales. Yes. That's on top
of the one we just discussed last time.
You wanna want you wanna ask truly why
people on the Republican side are fleeing from
this administration right now? It's because they do
I mean, it's not only that they don't
care what you think. It seems like they
don't even care to pretend they care what
you think right now.
But other other than standing up and going,
you're winning, and everything's great. Stop looking. And
if you don't agree with us, then you're
not on our side. I don't know why
they ever thought that would work. It seems
to be desperation to me, and I've been
saying that for a while now. It says,
a statement from a house Democrats on foreign
affairs committee ranking member, or rather just Gregory
Meeks, it says states that the administration is
repeatedly ignoring congressional constitutional role, like they would
to or have when they're in power, refusing
to brief lawmakers on Gaza policy and failing
to justify bypassing the congressional review process,
which, by the way, is exactly what Biden
was doing, but that doesn't make it okay
because one didn't and the other one didn't
get held accountable for it. The reality is
that the entirety of our government has been
allowing Israel to conduct this genocide with your
tax dollars without even blinking. They just have
different ways of hiding that.
But here we are with another $6,000,000,000,
billion with a b. Imagine that. That's more
than they've gotten an entire year with past
agreements that Trump signed up to. That's 3,800,000,000.0
a year they were getting. That's 6,000,000,000 on
top of that 3.8, on top of the
last four they gave on top of that,
that's continuing to be given to Israel while
they're committing a genocide.
My god. I can't even believe how crazy
that is. But here we are. Trump officials
bypassed Congress to push billions to Israel. New
York Times. That's I think this was written
yesterday.
Now here's what they're doing. In case you
missed this, literally bombing
I mean, you realize where we are right
now. There's not even a way
otherwise, that wouldn't pause. Twitter's been acting so
weird for me. I don't know about you
guys, but it's probably just me.
That we're at a point where they claim
there's still a ceasefire.
Right? That's what they're actually arguing despite how
repeatedly Israel keeps bombing. But at what point
think about how dumb this even is in
first place. What's your argument? That they did
something and you responded bombing them? Well, then
that means the ceasefire's over. But it doesn't
it's not what happens. They bomb and they
kill and they assassinate and they break the
rules and they just go, okay, and the
ceasefire continues. It's stressed, but it keeps going.
What are we talking about? I I mean,
this is the this is like the post
truth world they told you he'd be in
where it doesn't even matter what's going on.
They could literally nuke the entire area and
just be like, no. No. No. You're you're
asleep. Don't pay attention. It's it doesn't even
matter. The narrative followers will follow, the rest
are questioning in any way. In this case,
these are a bunch of tents sitting out
in an area they were told to go
to. Explain to me how in what world
bombing in the middle of this makes any
sense in any part of the conversation. They're
not even trying to discuss this. They're hoping
you're distracted elsewhere.
The Gaza Strip currently witnessing heavy and intermittent
Israeli strikes across multiple areas.
Just a bunch of people suffering.
And a bunch of you know, but while
they got kicked off of their land, is
and there's just no way around this. They're
bombing people in tents for no reason other
than sheer cruelty and power, she says, and
I agree.
As Scott Horton points out, in case you
wanted to see a close-up image of what
they're doing to save everybody from the terrorism
in the world, here is a horrific picture
of toys and backpacks and schoolchildren scattered in
the street killed in their sleep at dawn
today, and this was posted yesterday.
Or rather, no. This would have been,
yeah. This would've been early this morning.
After an Israeli airstrike struck their home in
Gaza. And as Scott Horton says, bear witness.
You paid for it.
This I mean, think about how you what
how you could possibly frame yourself as in
any way a man of god or believing
in some kind of religious tenant and then
being okay supporting this.
Now Sarah Abdallah writes Israel's raining bombs on
Gaza right now. 31 Palestinian civilians killed since
dawn. She posted this today.
Today, 31 Palestinians killed, but the ceasefire continues.
Right? Families burned alive in tents, homes turned
into graves, civilians targeted in the streets. The
ceasefire is a lie.
Don't need to tell you that.
In other news, since nobody cares about that
right now, I should even say that. I
know you all do. It is frustrating, though,
to see how little attention this gets.
Now in regard to the overlap of the
people that the IDF are training, ICE, and
your streets, I wanted to give a shout
out to Craig Pasta, our doula here who
did it on the on the ground interviews
with a lot of the people there. Now,
as always, you could, you know, take this
with you know, realize that this is him
asking him questions, and they could obviously lie,
and he could always no. The point, though,
is it's just more information. And Craig is
a good person with good intention, and that's
my opinion, take it for what you will,
who's out there just trying to find out
what people think. And he talks to a
lot of people. And almost every one of
them will tell, well, I'm not being paid.
I'm here because I care about this. And,
of course, they could be lying. But I
think it's pretty clear at this point how
much is being misrepresented.
And it's at least worth considering
that all of these people are there because
they actually care that this country is going
in a wrong direction.
And I'm like I said yesterday, I made
a whole point about this. That's not to
say that there's not org coordinated
efforts, like, literally top down, like, high level
funding of coordinated militarized protests. Like, I 100%
know that happens. I've covered it for a
long time on both sides of the paradigm.
What I'm trying to say is that irrelevant
or aside from that,
there are people out there who are just
standing up because they see what ICE is
doing is wrong. Both of those things do
exist in the same conversation. And so when
you broad when you say all of them
are one thing, all it does is give
the government the opening to use it however
they see fit, just like the left did
to you.
I know I know the majority out there
understands that point, and that's why so many
people are starting to be honest about this.
This is a great breakdown. He talks to
a lot of different people, and you can
read read through it for yourself. And and,
you know, the same general point. These people
care about what's going on in this country.
Now I'm gonna give you a a clip.
Oh, well, first, actually, I think that's next.
Oh, right here.
Where was that?
Oh, right there. Okay. So let me show
you this next. But, first, this is just
Kim's opinion.
So be clear on that. This is what
kim.com just said, so it's no more weight
than that. But I do agree. And he
says, warning, there are over a mil and,
by the way, kim.com is somebody, as I
said before, who's very pro Trump, very pro
you know, and has started to call it
out.
There are over a million pro Trump CIA
Israel bots on Twitter right now to deal
with the aftermath of the Epstein files. Any
Trump support is not organic. Now he says
any. You know, you could have said much.
I don't know. But it's his opinion. I
think that's clear. But I think what we're
dealing with is always it's very it's almost
hard to miss.
You instantly get these, like, same old bot
response. Many I'm getting all these responses lately
that, like, the other day, for example, and
this wasn't one of mine, but somebody was
like, Man, this ice is crazy out here
today. The snow the weather is nuts. Right?
Everyone's talking about the ice and freezing and
all that. And the people were getting responses
like, oh, you're a Democrat. You just hate
them. And ICE is trying to help save
us from immigrants. And, of course, you could
argue that person was just, like, searching for
the word ICE and responding, but I think
we know it's both. And it's a lot
of bots out there just responding because that's
the way they're being told to. And bots
don't necessarily mean a computer program. It could
be people, which I I think it's much
more like that today. I I honestly think
the days of these computer sets
little computer areas and, you know, all these
people in a room on computers lying to
you, it we're past that. I think we're
way beyond I think that's not even feasible
in the sense of, like, money and so
on, but it still exists to a degree,
especially individuals who go out there with their
own little stock accounts just to drive people
crazy. All that being said, I agree with
the fact that this is what we're seeing
today. And so I wanted to think overlap
that in your mind. You know, speaking of
coordinated manipulation, right, we're hearing all of this
big push about coordinated protests and people out
there, which, by the way, I'm not hearing
the point where you tell me where a
crime is being committed. That's not the same
as saying I don't care about us being
manipulated.
But if you're gonna allow them to give
you a rationale about why this should stop
when they're not get when all it is
is we don't like what's driving that, no
crime is being committed, well, that's the government's
wet dream. They're going, perfect. We can slip
in there, and we can say whatever we
want is illegal. We could just point to
the abstract
while they're doing it on both sides to
you, and they're laughing about how you only
care about one side. But the real point
comes down to the principle of it. And
if we open that door, they will take
advantage, and it will end up swinging back
against Republicans like it always has. But if
we're talking about coordinated manipulation,
what is this if we're not what what
what is this we're talking about on this
platform? Or or or in or in the
real world sense when the same thing happens.
There's so much coordinated manipulation to control your
opinion. It's not just protests. So it's worth
expanding the way that looks, and it's clearly
a two party illusion.
Here is a veteran. I believe his name
was
Ian Austin,
and
he's out protesting ICE. Now take it for
what you will. Okay? People have political opinions.
Their political opinions are not invalidated
simply because they don't agree with you.
You can have Republicans who clearly see this
as a problem. You can have Democrats who
think that ICE is doing the right job.
They are few and far between, But I've
seen them. And the point is, here is
a veteran
who, in every other possible way, would arguably
be on the side of what the MAGA
team is doing and is simply going really
what he's doing is he's calling out their
lack of principle. That he agrees with the
larger points, but at the end of the
day, how they're doing this is wrong. And
I get this is where I come back
to every time. It's not about left and
right or politics at this point. It's about
understanding that the way that they're conducting this,
even if everything they're doing is what you
want, is going to hurt you in this
country and is actively hurting you as this
happens.
They say, why would you be out here?
How the fuck could I not be out
here? You know?
Like, my nation is under attack. It's an
army ranger, first ranger battalion, did six combat
deployments to Afghanistan. Pretty bad PTSD. I spent,
like, almost two years in inpatient, a whole
lot of time in outpatient, you know, working
on that.
One thing I wanna say before we play
the rest of it as well is, you
know, that saying our country is under attack.
Right?
Well, this is interesting to think about in
the context of what is being said around
the other side. And you could argue both
have some level of truth to them. Then
clearly, from the right, I would argue the
honest people who may be buying the narrative,
and maybe I'm wrong and they're right. My
point is that that's what they believe, but
they're, from an honest perspective, you get what
I'm saying, believe that the left is coordinating
this and it's not organic and it's a
infiltration, insurgency. Yeah. Maybe they're right. But as
I said, that doesn't mean that everybody else
protesting there organically should be caught up in
all that. But you hear this and they
go, oh, well, we're the ones fighting. We're
the ones under attack.
Well, you recognize that people can see this
from both angles. And if you actually and
what I'm trying to help people see that
are blinded by this is that if you
really stand back and consider his opinion,
doesn't it start to make the picture that
Americans,
all of us, are under attack?
I mean, that's the point that a lot
of us are really trying to bring home
right now is that it's not one side
or the other. It's obviously the government from
every possible angle, but some people just box
out what they wanna look at
are coming after you, are attacking you, have
their boots on your neck, are suppressing your
rights. It's it's everywhere. So what you what
ICE is doing to people in the streets
is 100%
an attack on Americans.
Just gonna start standing back and seeing the
bigger picture right now.
Oh,
I hope that's not Firefox doing what we're
worried about, guys, because that just crashed on
me. Let me get this back up for
you.
So for those that are, you know, new
I've been dealing with a lot of these
weird tech issues. I've I've figured out a
kind of a workaround right now,
but I'm worried this is what this is
going into. If if we lose Firefox, then
ultimately, I'm not sure how we're gonna keep
this going.
Let me get this back up for you.
Let me play I'll play this clip actually
through and then
give me time to set this back up
because as usual, I have to bring everything
back in, put all the videos back up,
you know. No big deal. Here's, here he
is.
When they say, why would you be out
here? How the fuck could I not be
out here? You know?
Like, my nation is under attack. It's an
army ranger, first ranger battalion, did six combat
deployments to Afghanistan. Pretty bad PTSD. I spent,
like, almost two years in inpatient, a whole
lot of time in outpatient, you know, working
on that. I was assaulted and then arrested
by ICE the other day out here. And
then they couldn't press the charges, of course,
because there's video on CNN of them coming
at me as I'm backing away from them.
Okay. So a US citizen, a veteran, who
was not doing anything wrong, who was protesting,
and on video was not the one starting
it.
We have to consider, and we know it
if we're being honest, that this is happening
all over the place. You may disagree with
the majority, but it's more than enough to
recognize that Renee Good, Nelis Priding, and the
rest. It's considering
that maybe that's what happened too. I'm not
even talking about the whether, you know, your
opinion of the video. The idea that this
is something that was instigated by people who
were
convinced that they're fighting some kind of terrorist
insurgency and in many cases are simply just
going after American citizens. But in this case,
here's an American, a veteran,
who they tried to arrest, but ultimately weren't
able to because they had no justification for
it.
Them coming at me as I'm backing away
from them. So we're at Whipple, and they
take you in there. It's Homeland Security
asking about, like, you're from
Philadelphia. Why? We we can't comprehend why you
would be here. And I'm like, well, because
the nation that I was willing to die
for
is being systematically
oppressed with men in military uniforms, a private
army told by the president they have no
other laws to follow than his.
Well, how about the fact that I know
for I know I could verify for you
that we have Republicans that went all over
the country to protest mandates, and they should.
Good. Because it mattered. Because they, rightly so,
were saying, Well, this is gigantic. Right? This
is a very big deal, what's happening right
now. We have to go out there and
protest because this is not just about one
state. This is about the larger Yes. See?
Logic.
And the same thing applies today. And, yes,
during the Republican side of it, we could
prove that there are people that were, you
know, infiltrating and bringing a Nazi flag so
that made you look like you were Nazis.
Remember that?
You know, it's just so infuriating how many
people will choose not to recognize the overlaps.
Right? But it's important to think about that.
Right? Did the people cross state I mean,
I I I personally have gone to things
because people invited me. Does that mean I'm
an operative? You should consider that, but facts
matter. And when you find out there's no
evidence to back that up, maybe you should
ask whether you're just being lied to. But
it's so constant today.
And they're systematically
attacking
and even killing our neighbors in The United
States Of America. I can't understand how my
all my veteran buddies are, like, still along
with this. It's like, we took an oath
to the constitution,
and and and that's just being shredded right
now. How could so many people swear an
oath to something and then fucking Humpty Dumpty
orange man is out here, and they're like,
no. We're gonna follow him instead of Right.
So clearly, he hates Trump. Right? Well, I
know a lot of people left and right
that feel that way. Shouldn't make you invalidate
his opinions. Right? You also consider that this
is all theater. Right? All of these things
are valid.
That's what question everything means while considering all
possibilities.
This oath that we took a that we
that we all swore to uphold and defend,
like, against against enemies foreign and domestic. Right.
This has all of the signs from every
fascist movement in history that we're gonna lose
the opportunity
to resist. And so why I'm here. That's
a very important point. Right? Historically, this is
something that's always been that point's always made.
That, you know, that this and it's almost
used by the government when they want you
to think this way. Like, back with Hitler,
right, there was a time when they should
have stood up, but they didn't. And then
it became too late, and that's not an
invalid point. Right? Okay. Well, why don't we
think about that? The same point was made
during COVID. Right? We have to stand up.
Well, it's just because they they play the
left versus the right card. Now, even if
every single thing he just said was, you
know, coordinated and that was a paid thing
and he's it was all theater,
does it make what he said wrong?
That also matters too, doesn't it? Is it
true?
I just think that's it's it's the the
drive
how easy it seems to be in some
cases to drive people to ignore what is
in their interest because of a side is
it's confounding,
but it's everywhere.
So that simply is to show you that
there are people who are on all sides
of the spectrum who are calling this out.
Now interestingly, this overlap, Pedro points this out.
After slandering Alex Peretti, Vance tried to generate
sympathy for ICE with a story about an
incident in a restaurant in Minneapolis.
Now Minneapolis police
and the manager of that restaurant have come
forward to dispute Vance's story. Every and basically
says everything they're doing is a lie or
exaggeration.
Now you could also consider that the
Democrat and the owner of the restaurant
lied because they wanted him to look like
he was wrong. That's certainly possible too. But
at some point, when you look at the
information, how often Bances continue to lie, and
if we don't have anything to suggest that
they're lying over here, I think it slants
a certain direction. But consider both. In this
case, he's talking about how and I what's
interesting about this is how they were in
a restaurant and they claimed people and protesters
came in and boxed them in and they
were scared and and ultimately had to have
their people come get them out. Doesn't sound
like it's that unlikely. It seems like that's
what's, you know, what we could probably expect
with what's going on today. And if there
was crimes being committed there, if they rushed
in and did something that we you know,
at this point, what are we talking about?
You're going in a restaurant and you're asked
to leave. So at best, that's trespassing, but
try target them with a crime then. But
that's the argument.
And so what we're hearing from both the
the local politicians and the restaurant owners, that
simply didn't happen. I don't know. It's not
that hard to recognize that they've lied about
the entirety of these stories to garner support.
Worth considering.
Now I'll include my the general tag of
the different conversations we've had about Alex Petty,
about recent conversations, and and, you know, the
different like, Charlie Robinson and myself. I think
that they're worth listening to. I'll include those
for you. And lastly, I just thought this
was interesting, and it kinda speaks to the
larger point of people willing I kinda was
actually just saying, by the way. That's probably
why it was in my mind. So I
posted this.
Not not necessarily important. It's just funny to
me how often this continues to happen and
how even Grok will tell you that they're
wrong. Maga Voice, which seems to be one
of the most grifty, like, there's, like, 17
versions of this account out there and they
all seem to have a million followers. Who
knows? It says, President Trump stuns the world
by saying drugs reentering from sea are down
ninety seven percent. Mainstream media never report on
this. Millions of people falling for that. Okay.
Well, it's not true. And it's not because
Grock says so. It's not because it's because
you can look into the information and find
out that ultimately this stems from him basically
trying to frame certain things as the and
even him continually getting the number different when
he reports on this. But my point is
just simply that Grock even says, no. That's
not true. It's for me. It's an exaggerated,
unsubstantiated
claim, just like with Holman and 1000%,
just like not deporting US citizens, like every
other thing we can prove they're lying about.
But that's small point. Right? I just think
it's funny how little you know, most people
just reshare these things because it's about TeamSport
politics.
This person captions what I said, and I
just wrote incorrect,
and says, I'll choose to believe Trump. And
then think Newt Gingrich with the CNN interview,
where he says, I'm gonna listen to the
people before I look at the facts.
Exactly. He says, I'm gonna believe what Trump
over some fool leftist, shearing the destruction of
our country, which is clearly what I am
and am doing. Right? Trump repeatedly has shown
to be the truth teller, hardly, neither is
Biden, by the way, on issue after issue,
who while leftist have shown themselves to be
liars and propagandists.
I mean, I'm just so embarrassed for these
people trapped in the left right paradigm right
now. It's just you it's, you know, it's
there's I I gotta think of more descriptive
words because it is embarrassing. But what we're
dealing with are people who are so utterly
trapped in this that it's like this it's
it is a sport. There is truth is
so wildly secondary to fighting against the other
side because they're just so evil.
But, obviously, that's not true. Right? I'm not
a leftist. I think both sides are actively
ridiculous, and I called them all out. But
I'm also not actively
so the ultimate point becomes that she has
decided to interpret me simply saying incorrect
and showing what even Grok has to say
about it as
choosing to side with some fool leftist cheering
on Oh, is that am I wrong?
He's incorrect. Did you even care to look
at it? This is a huge part of
the conversation. But I also do not think
it's the majority. But you see why that's
relevant? There's tons of people out there, and
I argue sadly, I argue even good intentioned
people who fall into this binary trap and
then dismiss information because they don't know what
else to do.
So we just talked about because we're getting
into the Epstein part of this today. We
just talked about a a huge story that
seems to be getting very little attention, maybe
because it's kinda blending into the Epstein point.
But right before this, Jislaine Maxwell
publicly claimed that the DOJ was covering up,
I think it was 25,
well, 29 total men's names, five of which
were coconspirators.
The other ones are people just involved in
the process.
And I know that's getting so little attention.
It's crazy to me right now. Ghislaine claims
coconspirators
are being protected, her word, by the DOJ,
which goes over multiple administrations
clearly including Trump's. And, of course, using ICE
to divide and conquer. So So you wanna
check this show out, we go into that
pretty in-depth, but I'm surprised how little attention
that's getting. But keeping this in mind, think
about the coconspirators
the DOJ is covering up and how much
that fits in to everything else we're gonna
point at today. So let's start with the
mainstream
framing of this, which is just I found
this so interesting because this imagine this being
in the mainstream article a decade ago.
It's just it's it's like it's like at
a point when, I don't know,
a couple years ago.
Let's just even say, like, you know, 2020.
Imagine
thinking that the world would be calling out
Zionism in Israel the way it is today.
I never ever would have believed that. I
would say there's no way. There's just it's
so controlled. Here we are. And so what
I think is interesting is to read this
and consider where we were moments ago, and
that you made this happen. As the independent
media, you drove this into the conversation,
and it's also happening everywhere else right now.
But this is even what the corporate media
is framing it as, and we'll go into
some of the larger points I think are
deeper than that. January 31, Epstein files, Trump,
Howard Lutnick, Steve Tisch, among prominent names that
appear in the latest justice department
release.
Says the justice department on Friday released many
more records from its investigative files on Jeffrey
Epstein resuming disclosures under a law intended to
reveal what the government knew about the millionaire
financier sexual abuse of young girls and his
interactions with the rich and powerful.
The gen turn deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche,
said the department was releasing more than 3,000,000
pages of documents in the latest Epstein disclosure.
Can anyone else also acknowledge that how Bondi
has clearly pulled her safe away from the
front part of the stage? Because they're embarrassed,
because they know that everyone associates her with
failure right now. So they pulled her out
of the, you know, exit stage left, at
least right now. As well remember, she used
to be the one out front giving you
this information, but now the deputy, AG, goes
out there instead. And it says, as well
as more than 2,000 videos and a 180,000
images. Now Blanche has been involved from the
very beginning. I just think it's interesting to
see how the presentation goes. The files posted
to the department's website include some of the
several million pages of records that officials were
said were withheld from the initial release. Now,
as of right now, they're still breaking the
law. They're still
just over 50 they're claiming that has been
released,
so they're still breaking the law. There was
a there was a deadline. There was a
law passed. They they're breaking that. Whatever their
excuse is, seems irrelevant. Massey's been calling this
out pretty pretty strongly. Now one
example here they point to,
Steve Tisch,
the co owner of the of, New York
Giants,
basically
emailing him back and forth, talking about women,
references, and so on. Now there's a lot
of points that are very you know, there's
a lot that can be revealed by all
this. I find it telling they start with
him, though.
Prosecutors came close to indicting Epstein in 2007,
many points they're highlighting. Remember, this is the
mainstream framing. It says, ultimately, the US attorney
in Miami at the time, Alexander Acosta, signed
off on a deal, which you all know,
that let Epstein avoid federal prosecution.
He pleaded guilty instead,
Epstein, to a state charge of soliciting prostitution
from someone 18
and got an eighteen month jail sent sentence.
Now this was designed to eclipse the larger
stuff they knew was there, in my opinion.
I mean, frankly, I don't even think that's
an opinion.
One of the documents released Friday, though, was
a draft indictment from that period that would
have brought federal charges against not just Epstein,
but three other people who worked for him
as personal assistants.
The names of those people
were blacked
out. Anyone will explain why that makes sense?
Right?
So are they intelligence assets? Would be wouldn't
that be relevant? Or are they just disgusting
criminals that you're covering up for, which both
of which has already happened? And the fact
that they've covered both those things up already
on the record.
I just find that insane. You're and on
top of that, it says a draft indictment
says those people were part of a conspiracy
to recruit underage girls to perform lewd acts
with Epstein,
summon them to his house by phone, and
then pay them for their services. And this
is what the DOJ just covered up?
Like, on the record, covered it up. Blocked
their names out.
I'd love to know why. I doubt we'll
really ever find out. Continuing, it says, among
the records was a spreadsheet created just last
August
summarizing calls that had been made to the
FBI's National Threat Operations Center
or to a hotline set by prosecutors from
people claiming to have knowledge of wrongdoing by
Trump.
Now that document included a range of uncorroborated
stories involving many different celebrities and somewhat fantastical
scenarios occasionally with notations
indicating what follow-up, if any, was done by
agents. Now I'm actually I'm actually that's that's
the right way to frame that. And I'm
surprised they did, to be honest.
But I think if you really go to
the bigger picture, I think that all of
these are about really covering up the larger,
you know, they're all on the same side
kinda point as usual. But
what I find interesting is a lot of
people out there. And this is what I
said in the yesterday's show. That, we'll get
in actually, I'm just I'm just going straight
from the main page today, but yesterday, we
had the direct page to the the,
it's in yesterday's show, which is
right here.
Where was that?
We'll go over that in a second.
Oh, maybe I already closed it. Well, we
I it's in the show notes. We are
we just went over the yesterday's show, and
in there, we go over the the ones
that are subjective. Right? And it's important to
to point these out, though, because it's these
are people's testimony or at least at least
interviewed by the FBI. That would be testimony
discussing what they
believe Trump was guilty of. But we also
know that people can lie about stuff like
that. They gave me wrong. It's the point
is it wasn't something that was verified
or ultimately even something that was official. It's
just somebody claiming they had information. Right? So,
yeah, I thought it was in your interest
to know that it was there, but there's
a lot of reporting that's making this out
to be absolute.
And I think that's disingenuous. In fact, I
think that's made to cover the real problem
because at some point, the argument's going to
be, this is look at how they have
to point to all these false things about
Trump, and it's not even verified. And, you
know, I think that will bury the reality.
But I also think it's worth looking at
what they're claiming because I do think there's
some level of truth to this about Trump,
Biden, and all the rest.
But I'm glad they framed it that way
because that is the reality of it. And
it says, among the documents released Friday was
a 58 page manual that dictated
staff etiquette, which is so weird, by the
way, and duties in his Florida mansion, ranging
from how to interact with Epstein and Maxwell
to what stock in their to what to
stock in their bathrooms.
He says, Remember that you see nothing, hear
nothing, say nothing, expect to answer a question
directed at you, respect their privacy,
which speaks a lot to, you know, whoever
these people say nothing, see nothing, remember nothing.
That says a lot.
Now, former staff describe possible underage girls, which,
you know, then my point is a lot
of this stuff is, like, if you've paid
attention at all, this is just more about
what we already knew. What most people wanted
from this was information, and a lot of
it did come out here. Information to
other culprits, people involved, people that he sold
to. That's what everyone's waiting for, the actual
list. Whether it's in one page or not,
the compilation that they could put together of
people who were actually guilty of these crimes.
If you because if they don't have that,
then there's no reason that Maxwell or Epstein
would be accused of these things because trafficking
is that process.
And we know that they're guilty of that,
so what they've been doing is effectively covering
up the people that were involved.
All of these big names that we're slowly
finding out.
And really, that most people knew if you've
done your due diligence already. Pages redacted withheld
based on privileges.
DOJ. In a letter to congress, deputy attorney
general Todd Blanch noted that tens of thousands
of files had been redacted or withheld due
to legal privileges,
such as protecting attorney client work communications.
Now, obviously, there's a point you made about
the legality there, or rather just their obligation
as an attorney.
But you're telling me that if this person,
hypothetically, was, you know, guilty of
buying a set child sex slave that we
go, oh, well, there's a attorney client privilege,
you know, from a DOJ perspective and you're
going after criminals? I've seen them violate bigger
rules than that because of what they wanted.
So that doesn't ring true for me. And
it says, the letter obtained by the Associated
Press said that the justice department within fifteen
days of Friday's release
will submit to con to congress a, quote,
formal report with a summary of redactions made
and a list of all government officials and
politically exposed persons named or referenced in the
released materials.
How much you wanna bet that doesn't even
happen?
Just my feeling.
On some because they you know, nothing the
time frame doesn't seem to matter to these
people. But re and and if they go
past fifteen days, I I doubt they ever
come back to this because, well, the information's
out there.
But
if they have to give you a summary
of redactions made and list all the government
officials employed, you know, that that might give
you more insight to what they they didn't
want you to look at. So I know
we'll see what happens. I get the sense
that probably won't even come to pass. Blanche
said the department, quote, remains committed to protecting
the privacy of victims and welcome continued engagement
from victims and their counsel, despite most of
the victims calling them criminals right now. And
already being caught at either accidentally or on
purpose
releasing the name of a victim while actually
covering up the names of child predators that
Massey called out himself. That was the last
one. It's not really going well for them
right now. Epstein accusers criticized release as a
betrayal.
The group of survivors and their relatives and
the massive cache of files released Friday protects
the names of their abusers
at their expense.
That's what this is what the this is
what the people out there who are abused
are saying.
Quote, this latest release now this is an
older quote, but from one of the last
releases, but it's important for because it's who
it's from. This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein
files is being sold as transparency,
but what it actually does is expose
survivors,
which is actually what
happened. Reads the statement provided by the publicist
of the late Virginia Guthrie, one of the
most vocal Epstein accusers. Oh, excuse me. I'm
I'm thinking of a different quote. Well, there's
she has spoken on the record about this
in the past. This is being framed as
her publicist because she's no longer she, arguably,
the the the people are suspicious about the
way that she was killed or took her
own life or what the story goes. The
point is the timing of all this seems
pretty damn weird. I would agree with that.
But here,
it's saying again,
the latest release is being sold as transparency,
but it actually is exposing the survivors. And
it says,
as survivors, we should never be the ones
named, scrutinized, and retraumatized
while Epstein's enablers continue to benefit from secrecy.
How do you go about framing yourself as
fighting for these people while they're the ones
calling you criminals?
It's a crazy time. The group dismissed by
dismissed the notion that Friday's release represented all
the documents that should be legally made public.
I mean, isn't it funny how they've said
this every time?
Every time. That's it. That's all we're allowed
to do. Everything else is child porn. And
then, oops, except these thousands of pages. And
then, oh, it's a hoax. That's it. Oh,
wait. I've got this truckload on my desk.
I mean, it's just this is very, very
embarrassing what they the way they've done this.
Anybody on us has already called this out.
It says,
excuse me, this is not over.
We will not stop until the truth is
finally revealed, and every perpetrator is finally held
accountable, the statement reads.
Howard Lutnick appears to have visited Epstein's island,
and this has been discussed by many people.
Then we'll go I think we'll go into
some more of these deeper examples about this
in a minute. Lutnick has tried to distance
himself from accusations,
excuse me, from associations with Epstein, saying in
a 2025 interview that he cut ties with
the sex offender decades ago, calling him gross.
Two men's lives you know, the two men's
lives
continue to intersect, per the Epstein files,
as recently as 2018.
Oops.
Now how do you explain that, Lutnick?
Probably you don't. You probably hide from it.
This is happening with Musk. It's happening with
a lot of them. Now some of these
might just be that they didn't want it
to be seen because they, like so, you
know, what it really shows you even if
they didn't go to the island or commit
sex crimes is that they really didn't care
because you knew who he was. You knew
what he was doing at this point. And
it was more important to them to have
a good business deal or to get what
they can from or to, you know, whatever
they're involved with or to do all the
bad things we can consider.
But this shows you that at the very
least, they lied about this. That matters.
And there's more you know, there's bigger points
to be made about this overlap. I mean,
we we we're gonna get into in a
second.
The Bill Gates point that, of course, all
that's only thing Alex Jones wants to talk
about are plenty of the people that wanna
go that one, that one, that one, and
ignore all the other information, which by the
way is important.
But it's one point about something that's already
very clearly outlined, and, of course, it's something
that's I'll get in I'll show you the
email they're referencing.
Because that's what today, I'm gonna give you
the actual direct links to all of the
information they're pointing to, not just screenshots.
But what's interesting to me is it's actually
far lighter than some of these other points.
But you all know probably better than I
do today why he's not talking about Trump
and the rest.
And it goes on to say, steady stream
of text between Epstein and Steve Bannon.
I mean, this is just painting such a
terrible picture for the team that claims to
be fighting all of this.
It says, on June 2839, Epstein messaged
Bannon.
Now you can understand why Trump wakes up
in the middle of the night
sweating when he hears you and I are
friends.
The context is not discernible from the exchange.
Bannon responds,
dangerous.
That is very weird. Aside from just the
obviously disgusting relationship at a time when everybody
knew he was a sexual predator, which that
speaks volumes about who Bannon is, it also
is interesting that you're basically saying that Trump
was afraid of your connect why? What did
you know about Trump? Why would he be
afraid of that? I mean, it very clearly
speaks to something that is not in Trump's
interest, guys. And it says on 07/06/2019,
Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.
He was found dead, as we're told, in
his cell over a month later.
Now right there
I mean, whether it's, you know, the way
that this corporate media platform is trying to
frame this, you know, it's there are plenty
of things you could highlight that aren't just
about the Trump administration.
But I think this is quite relevant. And
And I think at the end of the
day, even if it is selectively aimed at
Trump, all of this stuff is things are
all things you can verify for yourself.
But
it's all sort of up in the air
because you don't even know what they're talking
about. Right? So just be objective about this,
but recognize this is not good for them
right now. Elon Musk emailed Epstein about visiting
his the island. The billionaire Tesla founder reached
out to Epstein on at least two separate
occasions to plan visits to the Caribbean island
where many of the allegations of sexual abuse
purportedly
occurred according to email chains, including in Friday's
document leaked release. In late November twenty twelve
exchange, Epstein inquired
how many people Musk would like flown by
helicopter
to the island he owned.
Little Saint James in The US Virgin Islands.
And I've got that. I'll show you in
a minute.
It says, quote, probably just Tallulah and me,
Musk responded. We're referencing his partner at the
time.
And it says, what day night would be
the wildest party on our island or your
island? There's these weird
character changes that I'm not sure if that
was by the but something they did or
not. But you that mean that's yours, the
word with that weird character change.
Probably so it's hard to search. I don't
know. But
the wildest night. Yeah. That doesn't that doesn't
prove that he went there for the worst
things, but it is continually interesting as he
frames the opposite.
And says, I will come and get you,
Epstein wrote in a follow-up email. It is
not immediately clear if the island visits took
place.
Epstein tried to get me to go to
his island, and I refused, he writes.
Well, that's at least not represented via email.
So he could be lying. And you'll find
that he did get caught lying about the
tour of his
SpaceX
facilities,
which he lied about. And that was something
that happened. So it could just be kinda
cover up the connection, but it speaks to
dishonesty.
Jail officials used ruse
to remove Epstein's body.
Now I find this especially relevant. I'm actually
kinda surprised this being reported by corporate media.
It says the latest batch of documents includes
emails between investigators
about Epstein's death, including an investigator's observation
that his final communication
doesn't look like a suicide note.
Do we really even need to I mean,
guys, it's so it it's
it's about as obvious as almost I mean,
I'm trying to think of what the worst
other example you could talk about Anthony Bourdain
or the weird examples that happened right around
there, but there's so many examples of these,
like,
what's the other one that really stands out?
I'm just blanking on it. But just these
clumsy, obvious does I mean, did anybody actually
think that what we got there was the
truth? I mean, you can compare it to
things like the nine eleven report or or
or any number of very clumsy, obvious,
everyone
recognizes as lies,
this story, even if he did kill himself,
which I don't believe,
was obviously lied to. They lied about the
cameras. They lied about who was there. They
and even the video that they put out
to make that go away
actually proved they were lying to you. I
just think that's insane how clear this is
today. And so the point is that now
it sure it turns out that they had
to try to create a ruse
around his body, which only to me suggests
that there's even more reason to doubt this
now. But let me read through this, and
you'll see what the way they're framing it
is more about, like, the media circus and
getting his body out of the way. But
it says, they the and the the note
itself didn't look like a suicide note. And
it says, to draw attention away from the
large news media presence outside the jail after
Epstein's death became known officials concocted a plan,
they claim. According to the 08/16/2019
memo, a jail supervisor told FBI agents that
several employees had, quote, used boxes and sheets
to create what appeared to be a human
body?
What?
That was loaded into a white band labeled
as belonging to the office of the chair
medic chief medical examiner. The media, all members
followed when it left the jail.
Okay. Well, that's pretty wild. Now what we're
talking about is the the argument is, well,
they just did this to trick you and
he went over there, or maybe not. I
mean, we do have we have video or
you know, of them rolled out on that
thing. Right?
But if they're claiming that they literally hid
his body and pretended that's what happened, you
could argue that this entire thing I mean,
this is one of the questions that was
asked at the time. Maybe he's not even
dead. I mean, it seems crazy at this
point, but realize that I mean, there's nothing
with what we're finding out. They're willing to
lie about damn near anything, especially when it
ties back to something like this that is
so obviously connected to
the entire playing board, it would seem.
That was loaded into a white van. Yeah.
And it says, and they left it, and
they followed him without the jail. But Epstein's
actual body, they claim, according to the interview's
notes, was loaded into a black vehicle, which
departed unnoticed.
Interesting.
As with many of the documents released Friday,
names were blacked out. So the identities of
the jail employees were not visible. Anybody wanna
explain that one for me?
How in the world would their names not
be in there? Are they intelligence assets?
What are we talking about? Why would their
names be redacted for any possible reason? Now
that we find out they actually lied and
covered up how that went down, even if
it was a small point for media,
we deserve to know their names.
But the guess The world they're building right
now is where you don't get anything.
Masked up, police, enforcement, kick your teeth in,
shut up, go back to sleep. That's what
your world is becoming. And it's all freedom
and winning, according to some people. Justice Department
didn't fully redact all documents.
At least one of the files appears to
show personal information that was meant to be
kept from the public. Now you could argue
it's because they wanted that out for some
reason and just didn't care. Or what makes
a lot more sense is these are wildly
incompetent people. In an email exchange that appears
to be marked for redactions
but leaves names and telephone numbers visible. I
have one example of that, by the way,
where Bill Gates' name was redacted in one
version but left on in another. I find
that interesting.
The and it says,
email exchange marked for reactions leaves names and
telephone numbers visible. The December 2019 emails captured
officials discussing missing surveillance videos from the New
York jail, where Epstein survived an apparent suicide
attempt earlier that year.
So you're redacting basically, leaving this out. To
me, that with what we see there and
what it's covering, it feels like just incompetence.
They just rush through this while trying to
cover up their own people. Epstein advised Democrats
to stop demonizing Trump. Just very interesting.
It says, quote, you might want to tell
your dem friends, Democrat friends, that the
terrain or that treating Trump that that that
weird thing. I don't know. That we that
treating Trump like a mafia don
ignores the fact that he has great dangerous
power, Epstein wrote.
Epstein wrote in the typo filled email, tightening
the noose too slowly
risks a very bad situation.
Gambino was never the commander in chief.
That's crazy.
That seemed to suggest that he thinks that
you know? I mean, you could read that
however you want, that there's an that Trump's
a dangerous person.
Epstein said that.
House committee now, also, by the way, which
I I think I said this at the
beginning, but you should also consider that
whether it's all of this, some of it,
a part of it, could be lied, made
up,
manufactured.
But if we have evidence if we don't
have evidence to point in one of those
directions, then we shouldn't, you know, consider it,
but don't allow that to be what you
pretend is the reality until we can prove
that.
House committee wants more from Bondy. The house
oversight committee has also issued a separate subpoena
to attorney general Pam Bondi for the files
without redactions,
but that has not been fulfilled.
Represent representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on
the oversight panel, called the limited release of
documents outrageous and incredibly concerning. Well, of course,
because they're they're using this as political leverage.
I doubt they would do it in the
reverse situation. But either way, that they are
they'd be required to do that, and they're
not I think that says something. I don't
think they want to reveal the things that
they covered up. Democrats criticize DOJ release as
incomplete. Well, it is. What I got whatever
side you're on, they've been legally required long
time ago to release all of it, and
they've at at but according to their numbers,
only about 50%.
Prosecutor says even more documents will be released.
Well, according to Trump and his own people,
that might take place when Trump is out
of office.
Now that was just a statement, but it
was from Trump's people.
I think right now and that was said
before. Then all of a sudden, all this
comes out. I think it's because this is
a fly by the seat of your pants
reactionary
effort based on how quickly they're losing support.
That's what I really think. So whether it
does or not, depends on whether it's in
their interest.
Okay. So let's go over outside of the
mainstream framing,
some other things I think are very important.
Now first, I just wanna highlight the fact
that we just talked about, Kevin Warsh,
and we went over Whitney's article, which I
highly recommend you check out. Probably just grab
that real quick.
There it is. She wrote this for Mint
Press News, Meg Group, Maxwell's, Mossad, the spy
story at the heart of the Jeffrey Epstein
scandal. Now this is important because it goes
over a lot, really, far more than just
the Brella points for today, but it also
it goes over the conversation of the mega
group, how it all ties in with intelligence,
but also the a couple different interesting points
about, specifically
Robert Louder, who is the son father-in-law
of Kevin Warsh,
giving,
or basically arguing that it's most likely that
he provided a fake passport while he was
serving as the Austria ambassador to Jeffrey Epstein
to be able to circumvent
a lot of things. But this all ties
back to the re the fact that Kevin
Warsh is now being argued he's being,
put forward by Trump as the next Fed
chair.
And so on top one thing I didn't
get into was that he's actually in the
Epstein files.
Now this is Robert Barnes saying Trump's new
Fed pick, a Bilderberg guy, which is what
I was pointing to yesterday, married into the
Lauder family, Estee Lauder,
fortune, is named in the Epstein files.
Ezra says Shroud of Ezra says, new Epstein
files revealed that president Trump's newly nominated Federal
Reserve chairman, Kevin Warsh,
is mentioned in a heavily redacted email sent
to Jeffrey Epstein by an unknown individual.
Warsh's name appears as a possible attendee at
a party where children could have been harmed.
Now that's kind of an assumption,
but
it's not that crazy of an assumption with
what we know the body of evidence is
related to. Right? But it says the email
lists Saint Bart's as a possible location for
the gathering. And I'll show you this stuff.
So first,
which we're gonna get into right here and
show you the documents. In case you haven't
seen this going around, this is the main
document or rather
website where they claim this is all gonna
be coming out. Now this is very simple,
but just in case you guys haven't seen
it, it's just basically a search bar where
you can type in damn near anything.
Or literally anything. And if it shows up,
just like any other search bar, it'll show
up. There's all Elon Musk or whatever else.
Now who's to say that it it's not
set up in a way where certain things
are not shown to you? I've it's always
something I think about with the way the
world works today. But But it seems to
be going to everything I can find and
it seems relevant. So if you wanna go
deeper, this link will be in there, and
you can type in and look for whatever
you want. You find something important, let me
know.
So here are one of the documents they're
referring to. I I found two of them
actually that revert to Kevin Kevin Warsh.
Now this is simply now this says from
you can't see. And it says to,
geevacation.gmail,
and I believe this is one of the
Epstein related kind of, you know, accounts.
Well, some of them are directly from Jeffrey
Epstein. We'll go into some of those. But
it says, here's the list I sent I've
sent. I just sent Harvey. How many people
are with you tomorrow? Do you know Steve
Cohen next door? Blah blah blah. Says, please
look us over. I think Roman's boat is
bigger than Ron Perlman's.
Here is a list of everyone I know
that's coming down, so please advise. And in
this, it it
it lists off
Warsh.
Kevin Warsh.
And this one you can see is actually
to Jeffrey Epstein.
And And that's the that's oh, so there
you go. There's the email right there that
shows. Doesn't always show that. That's the Jeffrey
Epstein email, so same as the other one
from Leslie Groff.
This is why I printed this for you
as well on similar same similar point. Just
list of people Peggy invited to William Astor's
dinner. And then it lists off. And so
here's what's funny.
Over here,
because there's a lot of redundancies. That's weird.
There's a lot of redundancies
in this in these PDFs.
But you notice how all this is
redacted? Right? Okay. In the same file database,
there it is.
These are the same this is the same
groupings, the same people.
Or it's a larger list, actually. What you'll
find is the same point of here. Let
me just do this. Make it simple to
see.
This is the same list of people. It's
organized differently. It's coming from I think it
might be relayed through somebody else. But what
you'll what you'll find is this is the
full list of people that were invited to
this very same dinner. It's the same conversation.
And
because you'll see even here. Hold on.
Spelling it wrong.
Any case, the point is you'll find that
you'll you'll find redundancies in here where the
very things they redacted are now suddenly
not in the secondary versions of them. Now
the point was really just before I get
too far away from it that this is
Warsh being invited to Epstein by Epstein to
a special dinner.
But see, my point before, I I can't
prove that that was something that might be
something you know, it's just the connection that's
valid.
Now, what you're gonna find here is
certain people out there going out of their
way to make this about anybody they can
to deflect from the the team that, you
know, that the larger reflection on the Republican
Party and Trump in particular. And as as
usual, you can expect Alex Jones to do
that every single time. DOJ releases 3,000,000 Epstein
docs. Now I don't even think that's what
happened. I think they're going like, what they
said was over 3,000,000, but I'm not sure
if that's actually how many they released. Last
time, they did the same thing. But, of
course, if, you know, they say it, it
must be true according to the team. Email
reveals Bill Gates begged Epstein for antibiotics to
surreptitiously give his wife his then wife Melania
after contracting STD. Now here's what's funny to
me.
It
what we're all talking about when you reveal
these things are emails that are being sent
by Jeffrey Epstein. In some cases, others being
sent to him or in the conversation of
his larger database.
Well, why is it the assumption that it's
true?
Right? Even with stuff pointing out with Trump,
what am I saying the whole time? Well,
take you know, you there very well could
be a lie. Right? It could be somebody
with the interest to misframe that. Epstein could
have lied about it for his own purposes.
I mean but I'm not saying I know
that, but it's funny to me that it's
it's the same old partisan thing. Right? So
Epstein and I'll show you the emails themselves.
To Epstein, from Epstein. Okay. So that makes
it a little interesting, by the way. The
email and this is what they're referring to.
And that because it's the, the article that
they reference in this is the Daily Mail,
which the link is right in there. Jeffrey
Epstein says Bill Gates caught sexually transmitted disease
from Russian girls. It does write that.
The Daily Mail is, you know, the trustworthy
source as usual. Right? But here it is.
To Jeffrey Epstein from Jeffrey Epstein. Subject, Bill.
And since I have decided to resign from
my position, this is this is the first
one. This is the one after it.
Effective immediately with,
basically, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It says right there, Gates Foundation. I have
not come to this decision quickly or without
a great deal of thought. During the past
few weeks, I have caught up and set
what's really it basically it basically sum it
sums up a embarrassing situation where he got
pulled into personal
fights between Melinda and and Gaye and Bill.
Just kind of embarrassing. But, you know, basically,
all that, and I make the transition to
position, and I'm gonna be leaving because I
don't appreciate this. And it says,
though it was kindly suggested that I make
a transition to a new position after my
six years of service,
and that Bill would, in his in his
words, give me a generous package. I feel
it would be dishonest to myself and my
future. Now they were the connection between Gates
and and and
Epstein is not secret. And so this is
that's in that sense, that's not new. And
it says from helping Bill to get drugs
in order to deal oh, this is the
right one. The next one's the one that
adds to it. From helping Bill get drugs
in order to deal with consequences of sex
with Russian girls, which, by the way, does
not necess say STDs.
But that is clearly what it seems to
suggest, but now we're getting even more abstract.
Right? But you gotta love how that's how
it gets framed as absolute by the corp
you know, by Daily Mail, which then becomes
Alex Jones Show.
Just shows you the willingness of which they
will run with anything that suits their interest.
And it says to facilitate his illicit trust,
merit with wearied women, to be asked to
provide Adderall for,
bridge tournaments.
I feel I owe it to my friends
and future colleagues to admit a moral failure.
So this is Epstein
saying that there's a
that Bill is too morally at,
inconsistent for him.
Epstein.
Don't doesn't seem to ring true for me.
But here is,
an another one, same day, later in the
day, about an hour and a half later.
I'm not gonna read it all, but it
says, dear Bill and, again, it's written to
Jeffrey Epstein from Jeffrey Epstein.
And it says, dear Bill, I cannot believe
that you have chosen to both disregard and
discard our friendship developed over six years. I'm
aware that accidents happen and how each of
us has chosen to deal with it. You
know? And so this it's it's ongoing back
and forth. Larry has asked me to recommit
to a confidentiality agreement and category okay. So
all of this is to be said all
all this is said or all this is
all it's it is on database. And these
two are there, and there's plenty more you
could find with Bill Gates' name in it.
But I find it interesting this out of
everything in there is what they make an
entire the all the the focus about. And
I think we know why. I don't think
it's a secret that Bill Gates has clearly
tapped into all of this and should be
I mean, like we just showed you the
other day, we were doing this quite a
while ago.
When Derek's the one that spearheaded this, we
started the expose Bill Gates day. Bill Gates
web of dark money and influence. There's a
three part series, and this turned into basically
what became a global,
exposed Bill Gates day. It was all around
the world.
Of course, that's not what you hear from
larger platforms.
But what's important
is that this is stuff that we've called
out for quite a long time. And here's
what David Icke said in regard to Alex
Jones. So you're going to mention Trump in
the latest files, Alex Jones, which he doesn't
seem to do? You have been promoting a
monster that anyone with a working brain cell
could have seen all along. You think that
Gates and Trump are not in the same
network? I mean, Gates is literally in Trump's
inner circle today.
Because that doesn't matter, though.
And then we have a follow-up where he
says, exclusive Epstein, DOJ, mega document dump analysis.
Bill Gates was the using Jeffrey Epstein to
blackmail top scientists. So just this overfocus because
they know Bill Gates is an easy scapegoat.
I'm not saying that we should ignore Bill
Gates. Obviously, that's my point of showing you
this. But it becomes
the building on abstract like, look through this
for yourself and realize that this becomes the
opinion they're framing based on things like we
just showed you. Jeffrey Epstein sending himself an
email with conversation about Bill Gates. Who knows
if that's accurate? I'm in no way suggesting
Bill Gates is not a criminal, but this
is not the same thing. And it says,
in Trump
and, basically, him go he's asking, you know,
Alex Jones and Trump. What about him? It's
not about defending Trump, he says in the
video. It's about the facts. No. It's about
defending Trump no matter what. So now so
now another attack on Iran to take attention
away? Yeah. He sees the same thing. I
agree with that. But just think about how
embarrassing this is to make such a blow
just clumsy effort to shift anything away from
all of this coming out.
Now, objective and honest people can go, yes.
We should consider those as more implicating Bill
Gates and things we already know he's involved
in and matters. So we should be and
also also that Bill Gates is tied alarmingly
into Trump today, and they should all be
because but, no. That's not how this goes.
It's a selective
sliver of one part of the story framed
as everything you need to know. That's what
these people do.
Now here, he's saying the same thing and
somebody beneath him says, hey, Alex. If you
don't say Israel controls Trump, then the world
will finally know who you work for. And
he posts one of the most important documents
that came out through all of this, and
it's incredible to me that this is and
they and that they choose to focus on
a Daily Mail article about something that I
can't seem to find, like,
verify that it was actually ever honestly what
he was saying or that it was sent
to anybody other than himself.
I find that matter. I find that that
matters. But here's the actual post.
Oh, actually, I'm sorry. This is the post.
We'll come back to that. Not with this
one.
Or the the actual document, which is right
here. We'll go through all this. You can
read it. It has points about Alan Dershowitz
being a Mossad agent. It also has points
about Trump being compromised by Israel. Now all
of this should be taken with a grain
of salt. Doesn't mean false because it's not
something this is the reporting or the, like,
you know, so if you have an FBI
agent taking a report from somebody or if
you have information being relayed from other sources,
like, that's what we're talking about here. But
I think everybody who's been paying attention can
see that this is just one more data
point in the obvious direction of where this
has been going.
But so here's what we get when this
is all this is happening. We barely even
scratch the surface. Here's what you get as
they're hiding most of the mow the real
important culprits in the Epstein files.
People like this, Ted Day oh, yesterday, come
out and say, BRAGGANG! It's incredible! The victory
that Trump just had. He's located over 2,700
victims of child exploitation and terminated 3,800,000
dark web pedophile accounts. Well,
have fun looking that up. And even Grok
will tell you. And I said, sure. We'd
love to see some evidence to back up
that interestingly timed claim. Quick. Look over there.
I mean, come on, guys. Really?
This is now this is and and this
the response from the people, they're like, it's
just it's just kind of pathetic, isn't it?
Now
if you wanna look into the claim you're
making there and you don't find evidence to
back up 3.8, it just can become something
that will Trump said, then we buy it,
then you're lost. Okay? Because if you're not
recognizing the lie around the Epstein files or
what that relates to, and they're willing to
take a a fact free argument about doing
the same thing that you can I mean,
this just seems like the laziest thing in
the room?
Now this is the point I was making
yesterday
about these clip, which are important. Here's a
going underground frame that says Trump has been
compromised by Israel. That's what this document shows
in the statement.
There's also tons of really alarming stuff, like
Trump being involved with the sexual abuse of
a 14 year old girl. But it comes
from one report of somebody claiming that that's
what they knew. And this is at a
time when they were basically asking people to
say things about Trump. So it's hard to
take it at face value, but it should
not be dismissed.
That's what I was saying is that there's
so much of this in there that you
could spend all day reading through people's statements
about what they you know, and it's hard
not to think that some of them might
not be politically motivated. Right?
But never dismiss anything. Consider it all, but
factor in those points. But he writes everything
every piece of propaganda this is, Afshin Rafsani.
Everything every piece of propaganda the US State
Department has put out against, quote, official enemy
nations such as Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran,
is nothing compared to the revelations in these
files. Assuming all of them in these particular
parts are actually true. But I would even
argue you take away even the ones you
can't verify, and I would still agree with
this statement.
So, also, let's not forget, and I think
you're already seeing it, let's not forget how
many, really, so many people in independent media
have been drawing attention to this for I
mean, obviously, Whitney Webb at the top of
the list for a long time.
Despite the censorship and suppression and attacks,
this post
is hard to ignore for obvious reasons as
we'll get into next.
So now watch as all the usual suspects
suddenly start telling you that they've always seen
it. They've even called it out before,
which won't be true.
Not for all of them. This definitely needs
attention.
So here's the document. Federal Bureau of Investigation,
CHS reporting document.
Case agent name, not there, of course, which,
you know, I mean, I see, even that,
I don't understand. Why would we not get
the name of the person involved with this
investigation? These aren't CIA agents.
These are supposed to be public facing people
that work for the FBI. Why wouldn't we
get to know who's the one that conduct
the interview? I just it's it's about trying
to stop you from being able to connect
dots. That's what I'm seeing across most of
this.
List all the present, including yourself,
and, of course, gone as well.
Encrypted messaging app. So right there, you know,
depending on what limited information we have, it
could be somebody that they could even truly
verify.
Now source reporting.
This is this is what gives you what
at least they're claiming this was, which ultimately
is a confidential human source. So somebody out
there,
caption confidential human source, was asked by the
handling agent about information. Remember, how often these
people all you know,
manipulate what they want to get from people
like that. Doesn't mean ignore. Never does.
I was asked by the handling agent about
information that he or she may be aware
of related to improper domestic or foreign influence
over election process in The US.
CHS already provided some of this information. That's
the CHS is the confidential human source.
Doc documented in previous reports. But he or
she expanded on several matters as described below.
And so it looks like this yeah. We're
talking 2020 here, guys. December or excuse me.
10/19/2020.
Timing matters.
Now it says Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz,
something first and then his name. And it
says c h so the human source learned
that Dershowitz
influenced many students from wealthy families. For example,
somebody like
Josh Kushner and Jared Kushner.
And that they were both his students.
Seems wildly relevant right now. Dershowitz told The
Human Source that if he were young again,
he would be holding a stun gun as
an Israeli intelligence Mossad agent. The Human Source
believed Dershowitz was co opted by Mossad and
subscribed
to their mission.
See? So even if this is exactly what
they do believe and actually said, it's still
their opinion, which being objective, I think that
matters. But I also agree with the framing.
I think this is what most likely makes
sense. CHS still continues to communicate occasionally with
Dershowitz.
Jeff, next one, Jeffrey Epstein was represented by
Dershowitz, which also continues to add to how
that clearly, that makes sense. The human source
remembered Dershowitz tell Alex Acosta, who we just
referenced, US attorney of Southern District Of Florida
at the time, that Epstein belonged to both
US and Allied Intelligence Services. How many times
we need this to be proven to ourselves?
I mean, again, this is just their statement
referring to what we already know, but this
has been so clearly, thoroughly highlighted.
I mean, John,
Kierkegaard just said the same thing in a
recent interview that he that that he believes
that, that he was Mossad, but I think
it's both. CH the the human source shared
phone calls between Dershowitz and Epstein during which
he or she took notes. After these calls,
Mossad would then tell Dershowitz to debrief.
Epstein was close to the former prime minister
of Israel, Ehud Barak, and trained as a
spy under him.
So Epstein was Mossad, which we already know,
I argue.
This is probably really uncomfortable for Dershowitz right
now. I hope it is. Barak believed Netanyahu
was a criminal.
See, what's interesting about that is that makes
sense with what you can see. But Barack
was also part of this larger you know,
he he was a prime minister of Israel,
and he's very, very different than the way
that government's operating today, but they were still
doing very similar things. And you can show
very, basically, smaller versions of genocide against Gaza.
And and the point
is really about the driving Zionist force driving
that government, in my opinion.
But my point on top of all of
it is that even they didn't like each
other. He thought he was a criminal. But
so this is the idea about even what's
going on in this country. You can clearly
argue that there is a battle going on
between who controls everything, but both of them
seem to not care about you. Both of
them seem to be able to do anything
that you're willing to do anything to control
your life.
But they're willing to frame themselves as the
good guy to get you to support
them. We're the good oligarchs fighting the bad
oligarchs. No. You're both just powerful sociopaths trying
to control our lives. My opinion, anyway. But
it says Saudi Arabia, Israel, and The United
Arab Arab Emirates are allied against Qatar, Turkey,
and Iran, and Syria, the riots. One of
the sources who presumably worked with blank,
asked the, the human source a lot of
questions about Epstein. He became convinced that Epstein
was a co opted Mossad agent. Interesting.
Continues.
Skip this part, baby.
Russian,
it says
I'm talking about technology. Instead, looked at the
source. You knew Epstein, didn't you? She said
Epstein was a wonderful man and that it
was a crying shame what had been done
to him. The source concluded, and this is
the Russian person they're talking to,
concluded, and that person's name was Masha Dro
Drocovia.
Included day one ventures was Silicon Valley to
Steel Technology.
So day one venture, like, seems a lot
of this is I'm not this is the
larger point that we could do an entire
show on about the different ventures that were
you know,
this weird scientific eugenics sort of, like, minute
like, that were involved with entities that were
essentially trying to
rather what's the right word for it? Orchestrate,
drive a larger transition, larger agenda.
But here this is
it right here. This human source advises
Chabad is doing everything they can
to co opt the Trump presidency.
Very important. Chabad is basically state sanctioned Judaism.
That's what this person wrote.
It is used by Putin to keep tabs
on all the Russia Jewish oligarchs.
One on on the day Trump was elected
president, Ivanka Trump and Jared were at the
gravesite of Rabbi
Schneersom,
who was the most powerful rabbi in the
Jabad network. Jared didn't disclose his stake in
Kadre because it is because of its ties
to the Russian state. This is where people
get so confused because you see this through
the right left lens that the US government
media frame for you. Now it says the
CHS Israel's had a very clear influence on
on Russia for a very long time. CHS
believe this was and is a real Russian
collusion story. See how this works?
Kushner has moved a lot of Russian investment
money around. The FBI should investigate Kushner's family
charities to find evidence of corruption and money
laundering. Chabad routinely uses charities to launder money.
See, you make they make it about Russia,
and then all the the game becomes to
make that, like, basically, that it ultimately ties
back to Israel.
And so you bury this in this idea
that is rooted in something that that is
completely false.
Look. They used Facebook memes and, you know,
like, it just it's embarrassing. But what it
ultimately did was trick enough people to blindly
accept that as the truth, even though they
and and those that really wanted to call
them out for his crimes were missing the
boat. Like, you see how this goes. It's
just it's always left first or rather,
divide and conquer. The government versus all of
us.
Now you get to where this is going.
There's a lot there's a lot in here.
The one point I wanted to make sure
you saw,
I think I think that might have been
the what we already shown right there.
I thought there was two versions of
it. Yeah. Let's see.
Oh, it is right there. Okay. Here. So
I'm glad glad I didn't miss it. So
we we read the first one. They're basically
saying that they believe that he was co
opted by Mossad or at the Chabad.
It goes on to say, Harry here, Tano
s o I didn't even pronounce that.
So we did that's a crazy last
name. Harry has been involved,
has developed Trump's hotels, and is a billionaire.
Here, this is this is funny. Look at
this. They literally
redact his name right there,
but his name is right there. Like, you
you you can't explain
that other than competence. That's ridiculous.
To know
Sodenbijo,
that's a crazy last name. But think about
that. I mean, isn't that embarrassing?
It's right there, right right in front of
you. But it goes on to say this,
Harry, we don't know because it's redacted,
introduced
him or her to the Indonesian CIA.
Harry, which we don't know his last name
because they blanked it out even though it's
right there, speaks Indonesian.
Harry
bought his Beverly Hills home from Trump at
an inflated price. Now it says he was
on Harry's house when Harry something, we don't
know his last name, that Trump told him
that he was going to f Amazon over
their military contracts.
CHS, the human source, advised that this was
a real collusion story. Trump has been
compromised
by Israel.
And Kushner is the real brains behind his
organization and his presidency. Now back to the
original point. This is a source giving you
their opinion. In no way should we be
presenting this as absolute proof of any of
this. It's just one more data point coming
from a source who claims this. And when
taken in conjunction with all that we know,
I agree, it's quite obvious.
But it's important to frame it the right
way.
So here's George Galloway. Simply, I what I
what I always think these points are relevant
for is I, you know, I I don't
disagree. I don't agree with everything George Galloway
says. In fact, there's a lot of stuff
he did during COVID that I vehemently disagree
with. But I hold him in high regard.
I think he's an honest person, and I
think he cares about the truth. My opinion,
you can decide for yourself. And so in
this case, when somebody like George Galloway, who
has the reach he does, makes these kind
of points, it shows me that at this
level, it's something that is self evident and
people choose to ignore it or not. Now
I think that regardless whether he posted it,
it just adds to that understanding and the
the way that right now, there's an effort
to make this appear as if it's some
fringe crazy thing when it's not, guys. It's
the whole world is seeing this.
Hats off says FBI informant, that's the one
we just read from, reports, alleges Trump was
effectively co opted by Israel and Kushner exerts
outsized control. I mean, we can see that
happening in Gaza in plenty of other conversations.
Kushner is not elected.
Now George says, when will you wise up?
Israel has performed state capture on Western political
and media class.
I agree.
It shouldn't be that crazy. Now for those
that wanna make it only about Judaism, I
wanna make sure we understand when even Galloway's
giving you a picture of them all with
their yarmulkes.
I I'm not gonna speak for George's opinion,
but I think the reality of the point
is simply that that is Judaism as seen
through the lens of the Zionist control structure,
which does overlap. That's clear.
But in no way does that mean every
Jewish person or that it's all that Judaism
is all inherently bad. And so here's the
voice of Rabbi account
who actually who posted this.
And I wonder there's a lot from this
one as well as, Torah Judaism.
Large Orthodox Jewish accounts and and groups that
protest in Israel, in The United States, and
get beat up by the IDF in Israel
all the time because they are Orthodox Jews
but disagree with Zionism, which I think makes
the entire point. But it says, we always
raised our voices against the state of Israel,
they wrote. As early as 1958,
long before social media, long before today's debates,
religious Jews warned the world.
The state of Israel was waging a systematic
war on religion.
Let that sink in for a second and
recognize how clear this is becoming. That warning
documented. Because realize, Herzl was an atheist, guys.
The founder of Zionism.
I mean, I've literally shown you the documents
on this show.
You can look it up. It's actually pretty
widely documented in his own journal. He was
openly atheist, and he wrote terrible things about
Jews.
It's always been a manipulation, guys. The state
of Israel was waging a systematic war on
religion according to this Orthodox Jewish organization.
That warning documented
forced secularization of religious children,
coercion of parents through loss of work and
medical care, restrictions on contact with Jews abroad,
compulsory conscription of women against, rabbinic law, desecration
of ancient Jewish graves, violations of Jerusalem
sanctity,
violent suppression of peaceful protests, imprisonment of rabbis
without due process if they speak out about
Zionism, and false claims to speak in the
name of the world of Jewry.
And there wrote an entire article about this
back from 1958.
People have been calling this out forever. We're
at this political moment where it's finally starting
to be seen for what it is again.
And just important to recognize, guys.
Now
in regard to the push the the informant,
Ken Silva here follows up with some pretty
important information, saying I that he's claiming I
can identify the FBI informant who made this
allegation,
Charles Johnson,
which I'm not super familiar with. Here's the
account. Interestingly,
I'm a tech investor, he says. Entrepreneur, writer,
currently on work in a novel. Okay?
He He says, I know this, he writes,
because I have an unrede un,
I think it means I think it's meant
to be redacted.
Johnson's CHS report, that's the human source, with
the same source ID,
Which, that's I mean, I can't prove that
he has that at the moment.
But him stating that, if that's the case,
would be pretty pretty solid.
And, look. Like we keep showing you guys,
there's if you search through this database enough,
you'll find examples of things they otherwise I
just showed you one. So maybe that's what
he's talking about, where they redacted it over
here and missed it over there. Now it
says Johnson
is the one
who outed Peter Thiel
as an informant.
He just got out of jail today.
But then update, he went back into jail.
Very interesting with all the timing. Who knows?
But it simply says moments after release, the
court held him a hearing to determine whether
Chuck and both of his parents were in
contempt of court by communicating about the whereabouts
of his laptop and other devices.
The order to release Chuck has been vacated,
and Chuck is to remain in jail until
Monday.
That's interesting. Chuck's parents were also ordered to
remain in text in in Texas.
I I mean, it could just be that's
way way down because they are not doing
what they're supposed to. But the timing is
weird, isn't it? And that's, of course, assuming
this is, in fact, the person they claim
it is. But I get the sense of
this.
And it show it shows right here the
dot the name and and the overlap. So
it's it's interesting that this would be somebody
who previously outed Peter Thiel,
which you could you could read that either
way. You could read that he's got a,
like, an ideological motive, or you could argue
he's got enough inform insight into the reality
that he's calling these things out. Maybe it's
both. Either way, regardless of his statements, I
think there's enough evidence to back this up
before he even made these statements.
Max Blumenthal highlights what it was saying in
there and simply said, you know, what Chabad
is doing everything they can to co opt
Trump's presidency. Chabad is basically state sanctioned Judaism.
He says Jared Kushner, Ivanka, Howard Lutnick, and
Javier Malay are Chabad cultists.
See, it's not hard. And this is stuff
that you will find them discussing
or their connections to these larger groups. And
it says Trump's special antisemitism envoy, Rabbi Yehuda
Kaplan, is a Chabad bigwig.
So it's not hard to see how this
connects. The point is people just tend to
pretend you're not they just go, you can't
point these things out because if you say
that, you must be racist.
It has nothing to do with being racist
or not. It has to do with whether
whether a religion or a political group or
a individual that these people are manipulating our
government.
It has to matter, and it does, I
think, to most people right now.
Greg Glenn Greenwald says one of the most
well known parts of the Epstein saga is
that then US attorney Alex Acosta said he
gave Epstein such a shockingly lenient plea plea
deal because he was told Epstein belong to
intelligence. He said that publicly,
and that's even proven in the fact that
he said that in response to Trump
or rather Trump's,
administration for the first
when he his first administration,
when they asked him about it and what
his statement was. Well, they told me to
back away, and they thought that was acceptable.
You know why? Because they want somebody who's
willing to lie for the team. I think
that's pretty self evident today.
And it goes on to say,
that was long based on one anonymous source
in the Daily Beast tabloid, and Acosta explicitly
denied saying this.
But now there's more evidence and more details.
This FBI report, as we just showed you,
describes a confidential source reporting the same thing
to them about Acosta and claims it was
Epstein's attorney, Alan Dershowitz, who said Acosta had
to give Epstein a lenient deal because Acosta
was told of his ties to intel,
meaning both US intelligence and Mossad.
But, see, I appreciate the way he frames
this because the framing is that this source
claims this. That's the reality of it. But
I agree. I think there's enough evidence to
already make that simply supplementary to what we
already know. Here's Acosta saying this as thank
you, Rich People Weekly, pointing this out. As
a reminder, Alex Acosta himself said it was
a conspiracy and made the as asinine claim
that they only needed to go after the
top player. Oh, excuse me. This is the
the follow-up. Basically making the point that now
after this being the point before, that ultimately
it's about going after just the one guy.
And I agree with this framing here.
That's not how justice works. That's how criminal
syndicates work to protect their own by sacrificing
a single member.
The second part of that is in
the purpose in this case
was to bring Epstein
to
jail, to put him behind bars.
And so there were other individuals that may
have been involved
that,
in any type of conspiracy, there are individuals
around someone.
The focus really is on the top player,
and that's where our focus appropriately was.
Let me, let me also say something because
Continuing.
Here's what Mario Nofal was saying.
In after this all coming out. Right? So
this this comes out
today, this morning. After this information comes out,
I just think it's so funny the way
that this like, you could argue one or
two things, in my opinion anyway, but this
person is rushing this out to deflect
from the obvious that he's part of the
team of
or of of which the team he's or
he's on that team. But then, ultimately or
the other way you could look at it
would be that this is something being fed
to him, which seems more likely. I think
this guy just pumps out whatever people hand
to him. That seems to be the case,
whether corporate or anything else.
He's, you know, equal opportunist,
sell out,
however you wanna look at it. So in
this case,
he says Epstein files.
Emails with you, Barack, where Epstein denies working
for Assad.
Same point as before. It's not shouldn't ignore
it. Right? But when you read this at
the time it's coming out, in an email
exchange with former Israeli prime minister, Barack, Epstein
asked him to make it clear that he
doesn't work for Assad.
Okay. Well, it's pretty obvious, but the the
body of evidence shows how clear that is.
So why would you then go, oh, look.
These two lying people say that's not the
case. We knew it. Because that's what you
want on your side of the argument. That's
not necessarily what he's doing, but that's what's
being done in the conversation. So
what seemed more likely is that this is
somebody going,
hey. Say I'm not Mossad.
Let's make this clear. Let's make her people
know that I'm not Moss because you are.
Or because you now you could also make
the argument that he's not a Mossad agent,
but simply was working for Mossad or for
the CIA in the same extension, you know,
that they're an asset. Same point as far
as what we're talking about. Right?
But it says no explanation given for why
the denial was necessary.
Other Epstein file emails also link him to,
Barack's family through unexplained logistical exchanges.
And the one before it, disturbing document describes
victim feeling like human incubator for Epstein's superior
gene pool obsession. Yeah. This is the larger
eugenics discussion,
which I do think is relevant to where
the larger agendas he was involved with.
But I just think it's interesting that this
is about them trying to point to
a doc
an email exchange claiming
that you weren't Mossad even though you got
tons of other examples of you showing that.
That speaks for itself in my opinion. But,
you know, consider all of it. Because I'm
not saying we know in many cases for
sure, but all we can do is look
at the full body of evidence. And right
now, you taking one example over the entire
body of evidence seems like a choice.
Amber Woods highlights this. Epstein pilot warned him
that his jet tail number was tied to
CIA rendition flights.
Planes used to move detainees to black sites
and torture. Survivors have always said Epstein operate
with impunity and intelligence level protections.
Orwell
adds this.
DynCorp,
Now how do you think he got access
to that aircraft? DynCorp is a private military
contractor. Epstein conveniently shared the tail number of
his Bell Long Ranger helicopter
with US State Department. According to the Federal
Aviation Administration
Registration Database, Epstein's Bell helicopter and the Bronco
are owned by the US State Department and
contracted
to a private military company, DynCorp,
for counterinsurgency
and counternarcotics
operations. And okay. Interesting.
So this and you you know and I'm
sure you probably remember. I know my audience
remembers
what DynCorp connects to. You know, the same
business Epstein was in. I guess that's totally
not a coincidence. Right? Well, let's play a
clip really quickly. I'll include this one, which
by the way is now gone. I think
it seems like he removed his own video,
so he probably should I think I even
took this down already.
Yeah. Because he the video's gone, so there's
no point in sharing it. It was an
art a long back when Kadowski was really
doing journalism, but it was a discussion with,
Cynthia McKinney, which you might be able to
find. I wasn't able to grab it really
quickly, but it is out there. Here's one
shady US funded contractor, DynCorp, and Blackwater Operating
Ukraine. We talk about the old story then.
This is back in 2022, but it goes
back a long way.
And this is one of the clips. We
also had an interview with her. There was
an audio recording, basically, a long time ago,
but that's no longer able to be found.
They deleted all the content. Former congresswoman. If
Trump goes after high level pedophiles, it will
take down dems and republicans.
This is this is Matt Agaras back in
2017.
That's Cynthia McKinney.
Here
is an important clip that I think we
should remember. Because what this ultimately comes down
to is the larger picture of the left
and the right being involved in exactly what
this all points to. Mister secretary,
I watched president Bush
deliver a moving speech at the United Nations
in September 2003
in which he mentioned he mentioned the crisis
of the sex trade.
The president called for the punishment of those
involved in this horrible business.
But at the very moment of that speech,
DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in
the buying and selling
of young women and children.
While all of this was going on, DynCorp
kept the Pentagon contract to administer the pot
smallpox and anthrax vaccines
and is now working on a plague vaccine
vaccine
vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine program. Program.
Seems relevant, doesn't it? Secretary is a policy
of policy government who has government companies that
traffic in women and little girls.
Now, obviously,
that's an uncomfortable question, especially when it connects
to the larger point of the the entirety
of our government.
But DynCorp.
Right? The the number the plane the the
rather the connection that with it,
Orwell's pointing out,
the at the pilot warned that the plane
they were using was tied to CIA. And
the information that's in this conversation down here
relates back to a DynCorp private military contractor
or rather, plane used through that. And so
what's interesting to see and I mean, this
is not even necessary, you understand. We can
prove that Epstein was trafficking. Right? This has
been a and this is what they were
trying to kind of hide from, the connections
to it. This is simply to show a
clear line. Again, we don't even need that.
There's tons of CIA connections. But a clear
line back to a government element
that at some level
was working with Epstein is what this would
show. And knowing that that DynCorp was being
accused in a lot of different ways for
being involved in human trafficking, it's sort of
ties itself together. Right? So I think that's
very relevant to the bigger picture. But this,
again, goes back to the kind of larger
discussion about the over, like, even back to
the Jeffrey Epstein and the Eugenics points and
what they were involved in. She's talking about
vaccines.
Right? Where they're they're working on this larger
discussion. But I I don't think it's unique
to one company.
I think what you're seeing here is a
larger sort of agenda that ties into some
eugenics plan, some larger transhuman and technocratic idea.
That's what I see.
Just acknowledge the facts in front of you,
but consider what I'm saying about the larger
way this might tie together.
Now let's talk about some other examples that
were in this.
Grissi points this out. Brett Ratner, the director
of many of of many films, including the
new Melania
Trump documentary,
appears in newly released images with Epstein and
redacted victims.
Think about how crazy this is. Like, it
from every angle, it's it's what it's showing
is, like, this network of people that whether
or not they all committed crimes are tied
in to what this is
in weird and uncomfortable ways. Here's the actual
post. You can go through all these and
look at the per you could see his
face in many of them. Now you may
just argue that he's there with Epstein having
a great time sleeping casually on the couch.
You know? Who knows? Maybe. But it seems
to suggest that you're working you're working alongside
somebody that you probably knew was not, you
know, what this is what keeps coming out
today. Like that one famous clip. I forget
who it was now where she goes, yeah,
we all knew what he was doing. Oops.
Which means you didn't do anything about it.
Right? And that's the case. You you Gates
and all of them, they they were close
to him at a time when you knew
what he was. That speaks a lot.
Ed Krasenstein points out, break in again. Somebody
like this, I think, has a clear motive
to go after Trump whether or not the
the information is there, but that doesn't mean
the information is false. In the latest release
of the Epstein files, call logs show that
Donald Trump called Epstein assistant Sarah Kellen,
who has been accused,
not proven, but accused of facilitating encounters between
underage women and rich and powerful men. He
called her on 02/06/2005
at 555
Why else would he be calling her? Well,
you could probably
consider a lot of different reasons. The point
is it's still important. It does tie to
a larger conversation with one more data point
that I think's concerning.
Noxie has a couple examples here to add.
Here's a victim,
here a victim is asking, and this happens
to relate to Kash Patel.
A victim is asking what happened to a
witness in her case,
proving she existed because her name was still
in the court documents. Her photos and emails
have been have repeatedly been deleted remotely from
her devices. Now that's a claim we can't
verify. But in regard to the documents, they
are here. And it says she begs Kash
Patel to make sure Sergey Brin or Sergei
Brin doesn't delete evidence,
which is right there on the document. We
can show you. And asks again if Kira
is responsible for deleting her evidence. So it's
certainly possible that aside from this document being
real and the in engagement that she's wrong
about it being deleted from her devices.
But with what we know this the level
this goes to, I don't know why we
would we'd consider it. I don't know why
we would ignore it or doubt it, you
know, question it. Yes. But we know this
goes to the level of intelligence, and we
know that that's capable, especially if she did
have kind of evidence about them. That's exactly
what might happen.
But you can see in the document right
here. All these are included. As always, all
the show notes will be included. You can
read the documents for yourself. You can go
back and search more of them other than
screenshots.
But it's the same one they were just
showing.
And the main point
was right here. Oh, that was where it
said,
was the main I'm trying to remember the
main verbiage I searched for. I should read
there real quick.
Yeah. So she's saying, not only have you
deleted and here's the main subject and date
and the names, but it says, not only
have you deleted evidence, David. Sigrid, why is
the rest of my email, etcetera, all encrypted
with this weird code stuff? You know, it's
it's hard. You these people here's what's interesting
about this. People tend to be framed as
sort of paranoid and crazy when they get
to this point where that's the kind of
accusations being thrown around. But at the same
time, we can quite literally prove that this
is exactly what intelligence would do to somebody
if they were in that position.
So it's funny how we always do this.
And, you know, it it's because the mainstream
circles the wagons and make people feel stupid
for calling out things that we can prove
are capable or possible. Be that's always how
this goes. But in any case, the point
is simply to recognize, you could read all
through all this for yourself, that this is
something that is
continually there. And and Kash Patel has been
called out for this more than once. That
he has been asked directly from these people
to do certain things, and they then called
him out for not following through. That's happened
three times as far as I can see.
One of which is that he's lied about
what they've been doing, and they called him
part the when he stood up and said
that there's no evidence of trafficking, for example.
I'll show you in a minute.
Here is another example. Explosive email to Kash
Patel
accusing Rupert Murdoch and Son of obstructing justice
in Epstein Jean Luc Brunel trafficking ring. She
claims firsthand knowledge, Eastern European girls sold by
Brunel into UK sex trade, personally met with
victim Ella in North London, alleges own abuse
trafficking by Epstein Network. Now if this was
something, for example, that they researched and found
no evidence for, you know, easy that would
be for Kash Patel and the FBI to
stand up and say, look. We looked into
this. Here's the evidence. Here's the information we
got. We found nothing to back it up.
End over. Story's done.
But they don't do that. Even if that's
the reality of it, they don't come out
and give so then we have every reason
to go, well, why aren't they looking into
this? Do they even care? Are they covering
it up?
Every reason to ask these questions today. And
it says accuses Murdoch of backroom deals to
suppress names, protect perps via media influence. I
mean, it's it's all accusation,
says Rupert death after truth comes out.
But all of these things you can verify
with the FBI document link, and they're all
there. But they're all it's all subjective at
this point. There's people accusing, but it does
add to the bigger picture. And my point
is this, is that why wouldn't Cash Patel
do something about these accusations
or show you that he's done that? Which
is in his interest clearly as everybody's accusing
him of what it appears to be that
he's doing.
Now true add on highlights some examples of
this is about Elon in particular, but there's
a few examples of
Trump, Elon, the rest doing what they tend
to do. Now this one's important, I think,
just about dishonesty.
Here's Elon Musk under deleted posts
saying to the best of our knowledge, he
never toured SpaceX. It's out by Epstein.
Don't know where that comes from.
Okay.
Well, here it is.
The tweet by Elon Musk addressing allegations that
Jeffrey Epstein toured SpaceX appears to be a
lie. Thanks for the tour. You would have
had fun at Christmas.
Right? And all these I mean, let's let's
even
oh, actually, this is the that's right. This
is the network state part. I forgot about
it. We're gonna get into that to finish
here. But what's crazy to me is that
Elon Musk seems to be trying to run
from this.
And it true on it says it appears
Elon Musk personally invited Jeffrey Epstein to visit
him at SpaceX.
Unbelievable Jeffrey Epstein appears to bring three girls
to visit Elon Musk at SpaceX in 2013.
This is all in the documents. You can
easily search for yourself. Marybeth was Elon Musk's
personal assistant at at the time. Looks like
they have gone to Musk's house in Bel
Air afterwards.
So at some point, you have to acknowledge
that Elon Musk is lying about this
to the best of our knowledge.
So that doesn't mean he broke the law.
It could.
But what it means is he lied to
you about this because at the very least,
he thought you wouldn't understand.
How is that not relevant?
And then here's another example where Elon Musk
is underneath this post about Epstein or rather,
you know, not Epstein, but Bill Gates. Epstein
says Bill Gates caught STD. That's the the
one they're all looking to, which if you
look at I showed you the evidence. It's
it's quite a stretch to make that entire
article built on those emails that are written
to Jeffrey from Jeffrey,
but it says,
wow.
Wow. That's my point. That's what he does.
2,600,000
views for wow.
And then, Kim Comet Misty says, wow. How
many people will you be for the heli
to for the helicopter to the island? That's
Jeffrey Epstein
asking him, and when they I just wanna
read you earlier. What day and night will
be the wildest party on your island?
But of course, that gets far less engagement
than what it
should. And as,
Majid Nawaz points out, Musk actually trying to
tweet through this right now. Still talking about
sex crimes in The UK by Muslim immigrants.
As if nothing happened to his reputation.
Now that's not to say that there's not
cases to be made about this, but what
I keep showing you is they're,
in many cases, sharing false information about what's
going on, even around real stories. And on
top of that, acting like you care about
this while you're right now at why aren't
you calling out this massive sex trafficking ring
being covered up right now in The United
States? Isn't that the same conversation?
You all know why. And he says, your
game is up, Elon Musk. It doesn't matter
if you stay or go. Everyone sees you.
And all those you've been funding in The
UK to focus only on one demographic of
sex criminals while distracting attention from the sex
criminals in power who actually run these operations
are now exposed.
This is,
Rupert Lowe and these people in The UK,
and this one's Tommy Robinson. You have been
fighting underage grooming gangs using funds from a
man who was sycophantic to the world's most
powerful underage groomer, Jeffrey Epstein, who was not
a Muslim nor a migrant unlike Elon Musk,
by the way. Every single one of you
will be exposed.
I agree with them.
Whether I mean, not whether who knows? I
hope they've exposed, but that is happening, I
think, is obvious.
Ian Miles Chong.
They're desperate to make Elon Musk look bad.
This guy is just such a sycophantic follower.
He just, you know, whatever. And look, guys,
you don't need to make him look bad.
He does it well enough on his own,
and I'm not talking about opinions or political
stances. He's been caught lying in so many
bombastic ways. It's it's hard to even wrap
our mind around, guys. And yet still, it
gets grows an influence because this is not
a real situation we're in. But on top
of that, we're not desperate to make him
look bad. You're what he just showed those
in for the things we just showed you
are not debatable, and he lied about it.
That's himself making himself look bad. This is
an eff desperate effort to be like, oh,
if you see something that makes him look
bad, just cover your ears, stomp your feet,
it's a Democrat lie. Don't even think any
further. Just put your head in the sand.
That's what they're doing. It says, but he
has been consistently calling for the prosecutions of
every wrongdoer. Yes. It's very easy to be
like, do something.
Arrest them. Action. Words.
But then, when you I shouldn't say action,
but words,
not really following through. But people like Ian
are all words and bluster. That's what they
do, and they love to point at each
other. Says, where are the investigations? Yeah. Exactly,
man. That's what we've all been saying. Because
Elon Musk steps up yesterday and says that
does not suddenly make him on your side.
It's just like the people that yelled the
COVID lie at the very end of it
when it was comfortable and acted like they
were the ones that broke the story and
they used that momentum to trick you on
the next lie. These people are lazy.
It says it seems strange that Ghislaine Maxwell
was in prison and yet her clients are
not. Really?
What a hot take, Eels my Ian Myles
Strong. Wow. You're so far out of the
story. That's insane. That's what everyone's been saying
that you guys were laughing at a long
time ago.
But here we are.
Remember, Elon Musk and the rest of them
are trying to tell you this was I
mean, after he, by the way, told you
Trump was in the files. Oh, and then
he went back and they're now they're cuddly
again. And now we pretend like it's all
a hoax because they're on the same team.
As Shannon Joy writes, they're all predators.
Shadow of Ezra. The new Epstein files show
that Elon Musk was in communication
through email with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 as
we showed you after Epstein was convicted pedophile.
Think about that, guys. I shouldn't need to
make that as clear as it is, but
realize he was on the record going, hey.
When can I come to your crazy party?
When's the worst craziest day? Knowing he was
a convicted pedophile
or sexual predator. Elon Musk, is there a
good time to visit? This is what we're
just showing you. I will send a heli
for you.
Where was it? Oh, they left out the
most important part in my opinion. When is
the craziest time on the island? Well, you
already know all of this.
Okay. We have Howard Lutnick. I mean, at
at what point do you start to recognize
how all these people are packed into this
administration?
Howard Lutnick, the billionaire who serves as president
Trump's commerce secretary, planned a visit to FC's
island in 2012.
Now look, like, if in case you're missing
it, even though I'm saying it every twenty
seconds, realize that it's just as represented on
the other side of this conversation, or rather
just all represented in your government.
But you need to see this in the
current current circumstance.
Lutnick previously claimed that he was so revolted
by Epstein that he had cut ties with
him years earlier. It's a good thread that
goes down the larger conversation.
And they're all being exposed for this right
now, guys. They lied. The the the emails
we can now see. Now the question going
back to the beginning, why would they let
this out? Right? Because this is pretty damning
for them. Well, I think it's because the
alternative is even worse, or at least one
of them,
losing power. Right now, they're so desperate to
maintain what they're trying to do. I think,
again, because the end point they're aiming at
drives you to a place where none of
this matters anymore, and they remain in power.
So I think this is about getting there
at all costs. And right now, releasing this
is, again, a lot of which is subjective,
which I guarantee they will argue
is just an effort to release that steam,
but a pretty
dangerous effort. Right? They're risking a lot by
doing it. But, you know, this is the
way I would read this. I don't think
for one second
that they would release damning information about themselves
for because they're transparent.
I don't even know why that would make
sense to anybody right now with everything they've
done up until now.
Lastly,
the connection here that I think is very
relevant. But I, you know, wanna make sure
this was not the the the large the
main part of the show today because this
is my opinion.
And it's also something that I definitely can
see is that it's you know, not everyone
agrees with the way I see this going.
But, I mean, I I think that the
the evidence of this agenda is
on the surface.
It's about whether or not you think this
is them
orchestrating, manipulating,
co opting government entities or all of it
to orchestrate this or,
carry it out. But I'll include this as
usual, the network state coup and the engineered
transition to what they call tech Zionism,
largely,
Sfini,
I always mess up his name. Sfini Vassan,
the former CTO of Coinbase who wrote the
book, The Network State, and others that discussed
it. It's tech Zionism, they call it. But
understanding this is, in my opinion, not to
get into it all,
it's the great reset. It is it's another
extension of the same larger game. If you
look at the tenants, the points, the core
elements of the great reset, save for
the democrat flavored narratives on top of it,
it's the same outcome, the same digital control
structure, the same digital money, the same tokenized
everything.
It's it's the Freedom City, fifty minute city.
It's a different flavoring, guys, and it is
the same thing, at least as I see
it. And and and to be clear, the
connected points are there, the funding mechanism, the
people involved.
So my opinion is the same thing, but
all the evidence on the table points to
that. Now what I found relevant today
was that there's information in these files that
connect these two things.
So here's just one of them to go
through really quickly.
It starts with something about stamps. Are there
enough stamp collectors in the world? It says,
maybe there's a reference I'm missing there. Now
this was from Jeffrey Epstein
And referencing sci fi cities.
Now says yes, stamp collectors will pay a
fortune apiece to ensure that they have enough,
each and every country.
As it turns out first great revenue is
selling stamps to collectors that require all nations.
Okay. Getting to the this is all just
random stuff. Now it says, actually, it turns
out this is what I found interesting, the
overlap to the conversation. Maybe it's not relevant.
But I think it is in the sense
of these larger you know, whether we're talking
about them manipulating regime change all the way
up to, like, larger
migrant
discussions.
Actually, it says, as it turns out,
the Somalis
have pioneered, and this is 2011,
have pioneered really quite vigorously in recent years
in forming highly active communities
at sea.
Now this is not the connect you'll get
well, he literally talks about seasteading and Peter
Thiel. But this is interesting, isn't it? And
that he's talking about a group that in
every other case context, they criticize for being
pirates,
but saying that they've cultivated a pioneer in
a really vigorously in recent years, the forming
of a highly active community at sea.
One that support extensive entrepreneurial
activities.
Great distances from the nearest shore, maneuver over
prolonged time intervals. Now Now who knows exactly
what he's aiming at, but I find that
really interesting and suggestive of that maybe there's
more involvement with creating the very thing that's
become a focal point. Not even to say
that they were necessarily connected, but that they
just happened to in the long run of
the narrative. But it says they've even made
such communities pay, sometimes remarkably handsomely, so that
they've naturally proliferated both quickly and widely. With
another hat on, it says I've been peripherally
involved in detecting the existence and location of
and then interacting with such communities. Which as
which, as
utterly remarkable impacts on marine insurance rates in
the Indian Ocean.
Now it says, PS, indeed, these dirt poor
people have innovated remarkably swiftly. This is the
low person responding, and this has been the
the the, you'll see oh, I think I
closed it. I'll come back to it. There's
what they have in these files are these
outlined pieces that reference, like, these
parts of it that are otherwise redacted with
typos and so on. That this is directly
from files. Just make sure that's clear. But
it's the way they typed it back
out. Responding, it says, indeed, these dirt poor
people have innovated remarkably swiftly
and why why they've even attracted significant quantities
of international venture capital. That's quite interesting, isn't
it? Of a not non too savory flavor
to be sure.
What does that mean?
Is that suggestive of the fact that the
entire Somali thing is some kind of venture
capital manipulation?
Wouldn't surprise me. I'm not even suggesting. I'm
just saying it's interesting in the connection of
what we're about to get to. But it
says, in the abstract and from a great
remove,
I do admire aspects of their daring do.
But then I was able to find a
number of features of the Soviet system of
doing things to likewise admire out loud to
the continuing fury and despair of the far
too many USG security officers assigned to my
case.
So this is somebody working in the US
government, it seems. PPS. If you were really,
really, truly entrepreneurial, it says you'll put together
a consortium that go out and leave
lease a dozen war surplus deep sea drilling
platforms
and deploy them in a line,
transecting
a marine a major marine shipping lane in
the deep ocean at a 24 mile pitch,
I e, just a shade less than twice
the internationally
recognized
exclusive control of offshore seas margins of sovereign
nations.
Very weird how much this is weirdly like,
you'll see where this goes. And it says
after declaring themselves
the constitute
to constitute the sovereign arc archipelago
of Francis Drake or perhaps Jeffrey Epstein, literally
citing his own name, or rather this was
the continuation, I believe, of her. But anyways,
as they could commence
to charge tolls
on all of the ocean traffic passing through
their mostly offshore territories,
which fees would likely accumulate quickly to a
tidy sum. One supporting the oh so swiftly
build out of evermore islands
of the archipelago,
their proliferation across other major sea lanes. This
is where it gets interesting. I think right
here or maybe one further down, it says,
these tolls would naturally be priced at just
a shade less than the total cost.
Where was it? Recommending encamped, in emplacement of
the initial archipelago
across
either the east or west entry, entryway of
the Straits Of Malacca.
Yeah. And then it says, Straits that making
the transition between the Persian Gulf and East
Asia, which which has always been a very
politically contentious discussion. Of course, the income derived
from licensing, fishing, etcetera, and the exclusive economic
zones,
that is what we're talking about. That is
I'm I get the sense this is sort
of the beginning of this larger conversation.
And right at this moment, we'll show you.
You got Peter Thiel, Palantir, and the rest
as he mentions
discussing
seasteading and the beginning of this network state
transition conversation.
But he's talking about right there, this were
this tooling of an idea of exclusive economic
zones, which was right out of sustainable development
goals, but it's also literally what they're pointing
to in things like Prospera.
But it says of a 200 mile radius
around each such island would be additional.
But these could be employed to offset the
substantial lawyer's bills, Washington representation fees, etcetera, etcetera,
that would be re involved in operating such
an instant sovereign.
So it basically starts with this idea of,
like, these platforms that could be used as
tolls, but sort of, like, in this conversation,
become their own little sovereign locations.
And it says, and to be sure, the
essence of the sovereignty lies in its enforcement.
But the famous international arm bazaars can instantly
outfit and staff the navy of any newbie
among nations that has the reasonable line of
credit. Great. So we'll we'll sell off in
whatever we need to to foreign militaries,
if I took that correctly.
Then it says, I'm not certain this would
be we can jump past this quickly. Let's
see. Where's the part where it gets interesting?
I think it's right here. Okay. Here we
go. So they've continued to talk about this.
And it says,
some libertarians,
which are not what they really are, tried
to create these new these new communities.
Okay. So what I think is really interesting
is right here
in 2011,
August 28, 04:47PM,
you have Boris Nikolic
writing to what appears to be blacked out,
but Jeffrey Epstein Epstein is involved in this
conversation as you can see at the very
top, which I always find this is my
point from before,
in regarding sci fi cities. And what it's
saying
is sub libertarians are are trying to create
these communities.
So they're discussing an idea that what he's
referencing
is that here's Peter Thiel right now over
there doing this, and they'll still forget Peter
Thiel is connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Now that
alone to me makes this all very alarming.
When it continues, it gets worse. It says
with autonomous structure, no taxation, even more and
and their own currency.
That's identical to what they're doing right now.
So and since islands can, under international law,
only be claimed if they are at least
30 centimeters above the high point tide. So
the whole thing starts with the idea of
how we can circumvent that by these little
seasteading platforms.
Some have even attempted to build sovereign islands
like the real estate millionaire Michael Oliver's attempt
to building a libertarian city state called the
Republic Of Minerva
on the Southern Pacific Ocean. Not sure how
anyone could get
significant autonomy.
Perhaps it would be better that Peter
Thiel
gives more to HIV, which I'm not sure
exactly what that references. I don't believe that
means what it sounds like. We are still
waiting for his reply from the October dinner
in New York City. Okay. So right here
is Boris referencing our as Peter Thiel and
Jeffrey Epstein in their conversation,
Peter Thiel's connection
to this agenda, which we already know. It's
public. At least, now it is. And what
he's saying is that this might be something
we wanna get involved in here. We're still
waiting to hear back from Peter from our
discussion. Now that very well may be about
this topic, but we don't know.
So continuing
from blank, but if Jeffrey Epstein's involved, I
think it's kinda clear where this is coming
from. And we know that Boris is now
what's back to, so they're responding. And it
says Peter Thiel's response to urban development.
Neat to think about. Cool pictures anyway. So
now Peter Thiel has sent them what he's
proposing for what this is.
1.25.
And this right now, Peter Thiel, same guy
that is convincing Trump to do this in
this country. In Greenland, Freedom Cities, Prospera, El
Salvador,
Africa, Greenland. I mean, all of these things
are happening, and this is what we're talking
about. I mean, just because Epstein was involved,
even at this small discussion overlap,
does not make it necessarily inherently evil. But
what I've discovered about it, what I've highlighted
for you, sure as hell is a libertarian,
and it's built on authoritarian state violence. And
I don't think that's what we should be
supporting. But either way,
the fact that he's connected in any way
should be alarming to us with what we
know about what he's invested in, what he's
been doing or has done and possibly still
does. And it goes on to say $1,250,000
investment into this sketchy organization, that's even what
they call it, on his part is probably
too small to even build one of these,
but at least he's trying. Peter Thiel.
What I think would be cool would be
to try this in Africa.
Well, look at that.
Right? Well, understand that Africa did become a
location for one of these attempts, which is
somewhat still in the process, but ultimately didn't
succeed.
And you could argue that was project
discussed and offered by the Epstein conversation right
here. Even cancer cells stop multiplying when you
can find their space. It says, mission, to
further the establishment and growth of permanent, autonomous
ocean communities.
Enabling innovation with new political and social systems.
So as we remember all of the very
alarming eugenics gene manipulated all the stuff that
they were involved in, the alarming research they
were involved in.
And Epstein's like, yes. Let's get this going
so we can do this kind of this
is how do we not see where this
goes? We already know that things like MiniCircle,
a gene editing company, is experimenting with god
knows what in Prospera.
And it's been called out by people that
are there. That the alarming reality of what
they're doing.
Floating cities. PayPal bidding their plans to build
a whole new libertarian colony. That was one
of the public discussions that went out about
it. Now it continues. PayPal founder Peter Thiel
was so inspired by Atlas Shrugged, and Rand's
novel about free market capitalism that he's trying
to make it a title, a its title
a reality. Silicon Valley billionaire has funneled $1,250,000
into Seasteading Institute, an organization that aspires to
launch a floating colony into international waters. Mister
Teal recently told Details Magazine this is what
they're what they posted within their conversation. And
it's highlighting what we've discussed.
The United States Constitution had things you could
do at the beginning that you couldn't do
later. So the question is, can you go
back to the beginning of things? Right. Let's
just reimagine the way the whole thing works.
Life on and bottom line is, it says
here, as a design for one of the
folding cities, Peter Thiel wants to start constructing
off the coast of San Francisco.
But let's not forget that it actually started
before that as actually doing it in San
Francisco.
Tech the tech plucrats dreaming of a right
wing San Francisco, a rogue's gallery of big
tech edgelords and their reactionary hangers on, have
a plan to remake the city by the
bay in their own weirdo image. That's how
they frame it anyway. That was 2024,
but it ultimately evolved into being something off,
you know, in the in the bay that
became the Seasteading Institute. And overall, it has
it's oscillated. Right? It's about trying to change
the way that we view the world, in
my opinion.
I think that was the last one on
this one.
Yeah. So here's, what it's the same like
I said, there's redundancy on this, but this
one is a little bit slightly different as
it says.
Of course, the income
derived from leasing, fishing, etcetera,
in exclusive economic zones of 200 mile radius
around each such island would be additional. But
these could be employed to offset the substantial
lawyer's bills. So somewhat similar, but the different
framing
and say operating in such instant sovereign.
Let's see. Make sure there's nothing else missing
here.
I think that's oh, I know. And this
is interesting.
Again, somebody they were blanking out before. So
now you've got blank, which I'm I argue
is is
Jeffrey Epstein. They asked why that's being removed.
Now it's going to Bill Gates. Funny how
Bill Gates is tied into this larger conversation,
and it's also CCing Boris Nickelick as well
and Lowell Wood. So they're extending out who's
in the conversation. But here's what you wanna
notice. Lowell Wood was the one that we're
talking to in the beginning. Then Boris was
getting involved. Now it's Bill Gates being sent
to, but from who? If what we're talking
about I mean, I'm just making this very
clear. It's obvious to me that this is
it's in these files. We know that Epstein's
involved in this conversation and he's very clearly
connected to Peter Thiel. My point is that
if these two are now being cc'd, then
we know who's respond who's the one sending
this out. But now it's to Bill Gates.
Peter Thiel's response to urban development, need to
think about. We were reading this before. What
I'm showing you is they didn't just forgot
to blank that one out, I guess, versus
the other one.
To further the establishment and growth of permanent
autonomous ocean communities.
So I just wanna make sure we're clear
about and then,
oh, yeah. This we read that already. So
that's that's the redundancy. But so the point
here is that
they've discussed this.
I personally find that very relevant to just
knowing that Peter Thiel was working on this
and he had Epstein supporting him.
That worries the hell out of me for
what really what they're doing today and how
close he's tied into this administration.
Now Ahmad Hassan points something out that I
also found wildly interesting
about something I feel is connected, but you
can decide for yourself.
Another post.
And here's the post as always with all
of the rest that we've shown you. The
two more radical ideas. That's exactly what he's
posting. I just wanna show you so you
can actually read these for yourself and download
them.
He says, after searching through the Jeffrey Epstein
files released today, which this was I posted
this on the thirtieth, I found one of
the most dangerous documents
concerning The Middle East. The document and see,
there's so much to get into. The document
is is correspondence with a person named Aziz
Al Ahmadi,
and it outlines their plan to introduce a
special currency
for Muslims
called Sharia,
specifically for The Middle East. Now here's what's
so interesting about this. And so digital currency.
Why would you call it Sharia?
You understand? That's what see, what's crazy about
this is not every not even every Muslim
agrees with the way that they're the the
western framing of what they claim they're trying
to do. It's certainly not happening in this
country despite all of their fear mongering and
pork clutching.
Wouldn't even be constitutional despite them breaking in
everywhere. There is not any sense I can
see an actual, like, even momentum behind creating
Sharia law at any place in this country.
My point though
is that you're creating a Sharia
coin for them to use, but from
an Epstein perspective.
So why would you call it Sharia? Because
you want people to think they created their
Sharia coin. That's then the the Republicans will
go, we told you. It's Sharia law. It's
their currency version. It's only Democrats. It's only,
you know, whatever they become, even though it's
all being string pulled back here by Epstein
circles.
This is how this always goes. So continuing,
it says, furthermore, it became clear that Jeffrey
Epstein knew the identities of the founders of
Bitcoin.
Now that's you could just bait I mean,
that's worthy of debate and whether or not
that's even what this show is. But it's
interesting to think about with the very clear
Bitcoin connection to what they're trying to do,
that they arguably
could have created this entire thing in order
to drive to this position,
and it would perfectly line
up. Now is that or or co opted
it, and the same conversation applies.
Anne mentioned discussing with them the creation of
Sharia compliant digital currencies.
So why would why would this inner circle,
who feigns to call out the Muslim Sharia
law thing, create a Sharia compliant digital currency?
Because you're being gaslit. You're being played, guys.
I'm hoping conservatives, more than anybody, can wake
up to see how clear that is. They
were planning to further penetrate the Middle Eastern
economy, both digitally and physically.
We're talking about Western elitists, guys.
That's obvious, I think. The two most radical
ideas involve creating two new currencies. Now to
be clear, by the way, I'm not saying
it's only Western elitist involved in all of
this. Not even close. I think it's a
global thing. But what I'm saying is from
Jeffrey Epstein's perspective and what this was being
framed as, that's what I think this shows.
But it goes on to say, two most
radical ideas involve creating two new currencies.
One would be called the Sharia currency similar
to the dollar, but each dollar would be
printed with we trust in God. The Middle
East could have its own Sharia law for
internal use among Muslims. Additionally, a digital currency
like Bitcoin could be used to create a
new Sharia compliant digital currency. This is very
exciting, he writes. I spoke with some of
the Bitcoin founders, and they're all very enthusiastic.
So he seems to be all about this.
I'm more concerned.
Here and and again, here's the document. You
can read through it to what we just
said. We'll be formed two new currencies, one
called Sharia. That's it.
Here's somebody following up on that, and he
says 2016.
Also, here's the document.
He says Epstein receives an email from from
Qatari,
Jabbar Yabbar Y, regarding Sharia guys
and ecurrency.
So clearly, this was more than just a
thought. Right? This was an ongoing agenda. And
it says a year and a half after
Epstein had provided the funding for the Bitcoin
Core development team, according to these documents, at
the MIT Digital Currency Initiative.
And it goes on from I think what's
interesting about this is here's the actual document.
It says, wish you a safe trip from
it's to Jeffrey Epstein from this guy Yabur
Wai. Congratulations on your new president.
Interesting.
That might be more than you think. You
are made to handle all uncertainties and meet
new challenges. Wish you the best and assure
you and and assure you that all my
possible support. I am in contact with the
Sharia guys and hope to come back to
you next week regarding the e currency.
So think about what Trump was saying about
Muslims right then and the connection between them
all and the idea that you're over here
making. I mean, it's just it's so obvious
whether Trump or the rest are even aware
of that. This is some this is a
puppet show that they're creating for us, so
we attack ourselves.
AF Post highlights this. Emails and this just
this is even further step stepping back. I
think this speaks to the larger what the
reason I was showing you the ecurrency overlap
and the rest, look what they're doing in
Gaza right now. Right? Look at what they're
doing in regard to the Gaza plan
for technocracy,
which is digital currency, tokenized
everything, fifteen minute checkpoints. I mean, it's it's
exactly what they're talking about, and and they
even themselves call it a technocratic government.
I think that's relevant. So when you're thinking
about the larger agenda, which this is, this
is the network state agenda. Then ask yourself
what that if the larger ecurrency discussion about
what they're trying to do might be that's
what I'm trying to highlight is these different
interconnected points to what this becomes other than
just clearly him supporting the sea setting discussion.
This one is about larger foreign policy points,
but I think it all relates to a
globalist kind of idea. Emails from July 2011
show that Jeffrey Epstein and an associate named
Greg Brown discuss plans to extort Libyan officials
and seize state assets under the pretext of
helping rebuild the country.
Typical.
That could just be them exploiting it, which
is what they do. With involvement from former
MI six and Mossad, as usual, UK, Israel,
same old thing, the correspondence took place during
Libya's Civil War, which is not really what
we're talking about, weeks before Gaddafi was removed
from power, indicating the plans were devised while
the regime was still in control.
So you should also ask whether they had
a a role in all of this through
Clinton, through anybody else. But it just shows
you an effort to be at least profit
from, let alone possibly be involved with the
collapse of this country, which is relevant whether
it's about Africa and freedom cities or or
network states or just the idea of control
over this very important location. You know, there's
it's a lot of moving factors. But to
me, he ties back into all of this.
Oh, and then there's just two of them
in in regard to this, you know, with
great Greg Brown from Epstein. Remember, there are
already $80,000,000,000
in frozen fund assets internationally, of which 32,400,000,000.0
are in The United States. And it's estimated
that the real number is somewhere between three
to four times the number in sovereign stolen
and misappropriated assets. So if we can identify,
recover five to 10%
and receive 10 to 25 as compensation, we
are talking about billions of dollars. So they
are just the vultures waiting to take advantage
and pick the corpse of what they did
to that country,
if not more.
And on top of that, Emily here,
Jasinski points out Epstein tells Bannon
he's with the entire Macron government,
which, by the way, shouldn't be that shocking.
One that Bannon is buddy buddy with Epstein,
but also that he's over there basically puppeteering
this government, which is what I think this
has always been.
As the as this says, now at the
pyramid with the entire government, what are your
plans? Macron government? He says that's Bannon. Yep.
The ministers of the elite, he writes.
Not that's not to say that that proves
that they're controlling them, but you realize what
this show is about, the timing of this
and the fact that he frames them as
that. You know, he's all there's always been
globalist entities. Macron, very clearly.
Hell of a December 2018 exchange here between
Bannon and Epstein. Epstein says he's getting John
Bolton on board with the idea that Cutter
is the linchpin in The Middle East. Basically,
lying to deflect from Israel is what I'm
arguing. And Bannon says that while he's got
Bolton his NSA job, he will not cross
Sheldon Adelson.
How much more clear can this get? And
in case you didn't notice, the links to
both of these are all right down here,
guys. You could look this up for yourself.
And what's crazy is, one, that they're trying
to basically create the shift to make and
Cutter has been used through his Israel. We
can see that with Hamas more than anything.
But realize that this is a sidestep. And
on top of that,
that Bolton is on board, and that he's
afraid to cross Sheldon Adelson. I mean, this
has never stopped going on. Right now, it's
become more clear than ever to Americans, but
the tight the noose is tightening as we're
paying attention.
Now last point.
I think last yeah. Last couple points, really.
Just the last larger disconnects to the same
conversation, and we'll finish with some contradictory stuff.
The great Palantir reset. Now the the Palantir
connection to this is also very clear. But
pal Peter Thiel himself is enough to make
that connection. But I'll include this about what
what the reason this is important to think
about is not just the the the what
they're doing, but that this is the the
the newest extension of what this transition
whole of government transition of our lives has
been and is planned for.
And Derek's great article about the Palantir world
order makes that even more clear.
Clearing the Fog writes, DHS is using Israeli
phone hacking software in The US. We just
reported this yesterday just to set the point
again. They also use mobile Fortify,
ClearView AI facial recognition. They're using MediGlasses. They're
I mean, this this is massive surveillance like
we've never seen. They feed in the info
into a Palantir product that claims to provide
the location of suspects, even if that's against
even if you have rights to privacy and
you're not doing anything wrong. And it says,
and it looks like they're using this against
people who simply filmed them, as they've recently
just made public.
Says how ICE already knows who Minneapolis protesters
are. Guess what? You're now a domestic terrorist.
Well, here's The Guardian article. I obtained access
to Israeli made spyware that can hack phones
and encrypted apps. We just went over how
these very groups are caught criminal activity or
paragon solutions, which Trump made a deal with,
graphite,
Elite, Gotham. All of these are directly tied
in with Israel Intelligence and actively spying on
Americans in criminal ways.
Hashtag winning.
The point, though, is to connect this well,
actually, this clip first and then to the
Epstein files and Palantir, which is not new,
by the way, but just worth pointing out.
And we'll finish with the hypocrisy.
Democracy Now talking to a this is ACOU
is raising alarm over the facial recognition app
that's on their phones and is being used
against Americans.
Explain what this technology, what this app is.
This is a facial recognition app, that's loaded
onto the smartphones that DHS agents, ICE and
CBP agents, are carrying with them.
It links into a giant database of photos
of people, as you said, more than 200,000,000
photos,
and into voluminous federal databases that include immigration
related records, border crossing records, purported criminal records.
Some of these databases are notoriously
error filled,
and it's being used on the street in
ways that are dangerous, that are totally unprecedented
in this country,
and that are frankly, blatantly
illegal.
It's being used on US citizens, lawful permanent
residents. It's used being being used indiscriminately
by massed federal agents, without people's consent, without
a way to say no in ways that
are really harming people every day.
You know, I'm thinking about,
the recent
arrest
of,
the attorney and,
minister,
Levy Armstrong,
who when she was arrested and they admitted
that they
changed her face, made her cry as she
was being taken away, though she wasn't,
her lawyer said there was one,
ICE agent just filming her face.
Yeah. You know, we we see a few
different things happening in parallel here, and they're
all related.
We see during the the so called immigration
stops and detentions,
ICE and CBP agents using this face recognition
app, even to the exclusion of people showing
trying to show documentary evidence of citizenship. We
also see these federal agents
citizenship.
We also see these federal agents
filming and harassing protesters,
filming and harassing people who are just trying
to record what's going on in their neighborhoods.
We don't know the degree to which they're
using face recognition technology
there, but they are certainly going way beyond
the bounds of what people's protected rights are.
This is Ken Klippenstein,
the journalist, sharing a video on social media
last week of an exchange between a legal
observer in Maine and an immigration agent she's
recording. The video begins with the agent
photographing the observer's license plate. Here's the exchange.
It's not illegal to record.
No. Exactly. Yeah. That's what we're doing. Yeah.
Why are you checking my information down? Because
we have a nice little database. Oh, good.
And now you're considered the domestic terrorist. So
We're videotaping you? Yeah. Over here. Are you
crazy? What you got to do over here?
Your response, Nate Fareed Wetzler? I wanna be
very clear here because the law is completely
clear. The first amendment to our constitution protects
your right to record law enforcement and government
agents doing their jobs in public.
That's a core protection for accountability
so that we can know what the government
is doing and when it is violating the
law. Retribution against people for doing that violates
the constitution. It's illegal, and we at the
ACLU and as a nation won't stand for
it.
Now I know you guys know this. It's
you know, this is very clear, I think,
the obvious reality of the law. But what's
what's crazy to me is that so, like,
the the
excuse me.
The
where were we? Hold on. I'm trying to
remember the,
clip.
One second.
Alright.
Here.
There we go.
Explain what the
It was let's see. I just don't remember
what what to record.
Oh, right. Right. Okay. So, you know, the
the woman who's out there.
You know, the the clearly, from an objective
standpoint, you could look at that and be
like, okay. That's great. I mean, maybe she's
part of some coordinated thing, but what are
you what are you talking about? That now
just by virtue of being present, you're just
gonna be subjectively
in some database. And maybe he's kidding, but
we know that's not the case. We and
some some of these are happening.
My point is that the the typical people,
the Joneses and Benny Johnsons out there that
will laugh and go, they deserve all Democrats
are one thing. I I mean, I'm I'm
continually baffled why people don't just laugh outright
about that.
Yeah. We that's my my point is objective
honest people, you can say, well, yeah. Some
of them, some part, some element of this
is being used against us. But doesn't that
then
inherently
undermine attack at its root, the core of
what we're all fighting for?
The constitution, your rights. And these people out
there yucking it up about how bad look
dumb Democrats got what they deserve. Like, these
are children.
I mean, and it's just it's again, my
larger opinion, what I can stand back from
it all, is that I don't I think
majority are doing that to a varying degree.
But I still confront this when you're in
the moment when you're looking at stuff going,
god, how can people think like, oh, but
they're bought. You know, you go through this
this cycle of it, but it's just
you tell me what you think.
Because, like, as I've always said, there are
people that I see that I know are
genuine that still seem to fall for this,
so I I can't pretend like it's literally
all or nothing.
But let's watch this clip as well. We
just played this one from the other day
just to bring this into the surveillance part
about Palantir because this is also what's happening.
So as they're highlighting there, what they're doing
is criminal. Even if you think what they're
doing, what they're aiming to accomplish is 100%
justified. And if you're okay with that, then
you're a hypocrite. End of story. And in
this case,
this is where it's all leading to while
they pit us against each other.
Liberals hate ICE because they think it's about
border policy. It's not why I hate ICE.
I hate ICE because while we were all
arguing about politics, they were importing the software
from Gaza's genocide.
Talking about a company called Paragon Solutions. They
make a spyware called Graphite
that was used to track and target Palestinians
in real time. They took that exact same
technology,
rebranded it as immigration OS, and then sold
it to ICE to use on us. This
is no longer about stopping illegal immigrants.
This is about creating a digital prison for
every American citizen.
They're using the same digital twin technology
that mapped every single person, car, and building
in Gaza to create a live real time
map of your neighborhood,
your phone, your car, you. The goal has
never been about security. The goal is total
control, and this is the foundational system for
the new world order. It's the b system
everyone talks about, but it's not a prophecy.
It's a product. It's already here.
They tested it on Gaza.
They saw how perfectly the AI could automate
targeting, how it could remove human conscience from
the equation, and just follow the code.
They saw that it worked. Now they're rolling
it out on us. So don't talk to
me about left or right. It's bullshit.
It's about a system of technological control that's
so vast,
so complete that it makes all of our
political opinions completely irrelevant.
So while we're fighting over bullshit in politics,
they've brought the AI that they built for
war back to us.
Exactly.
And, again, like I said the other day,
let's not forget that everything he just broke
down right there has been repeated 70,000
times on this show, or from Derek or
from Whitney and plenty of others. It doesn't
make any less relevant. And follow him for
it because it's important and correct. But just
recognize that information is out there on the
surface. It's been there for a very long
time. It's just about whether you not whether
or not you, as an individual, choose to
do your due diligence. And I'm not talking
about digging through some old encyclopedias or, you
know, looking through some archives.
It's right there.
It's right on the surface of the conversation.
But, of course, algorithmically,
things like the last American vagabond just don't
even show up. So you have to find
it. But that's the difficult part for some
people. Now, you know, if you don't like
this platform, there's plenty of others out there
who are doing the same work.
But so here's a couple of examples
from the Epstein files of how Palantir is
mentioned, discussed, tied into it. And let's be
clear.
Peter Thiel, in more than one example, is
compromised in the overlap of Epstein.
But this says this is from Richard Khan
to Jeffrey Epstein. Not sure your thoughts on
Palantir, but if remote remotely positive,
then David then David, access to shares seems
like a 50% discount to market. Please advise.
Thank you.
Just at this point, just discussing whether or
not they wanna invest in 2016,
which we're realizing they already had an overlap
with them back in 2011 with the discussion
of the sea steading point.
This one's 2018.
To Jeffrey Epstein from Marsha Drokova.
Happy Thanksgiving. Thank you for all the advice.
Time and time and your ideas and presence
in my life. A close friend of mine,
Neil
Sirbreena
Sir Bryony
is visiting New York next week. Advice
week advice, elk. He's 20 years old genius,
and he's a Thiel Fellow. That's Peter Thiel.
Last year, he simultaneously built 2 7 figure
revenues, and I think that was the only
reference right there. Over here was, basically within
where was it? Few months ago, he started
doing a security for AI company, super important
topic, with a number of significant advisers from
Washington, raised money from Palantir founders and a
few hedge funds. He's extremely technical and smart,
walking encyclopedia. Now this doesn't this is just
this person being brought up to Epstein.
But it is
worth considering, one, whether you could find something
larger to connect to it, but also just
that this is, you know, the
precursors to, I think, a lot of things
that ultimately end up happening.
Here
is one that blanked out from end to
2020.
And what was this one again?
This was
mobile version, searchable archives, today's list of content.
What was this one again? I went through
all these earlier.
Critics worry about Palantir's use of personal information
was one of the thing one of the
bullet points in there.
Oh, that's right. Oh, that's right. This was
just more of a they so this is
being sent between this is it's it doesn't
show who and from, but it's in the
Epstein files. And what there it's a lot
of different,
Trump related
articles and blurbs, and it's simply saying in
New York time, basically, the point was simply
people are concerned about Palantir's
absorbing of our personal information. It's exactly where
we are. This one oh, that was that
was the one just looking for this part.
I already got it for myself. Palantir Technologies,
two primary software programs, Gotham and Foundry.
Alright. So at this point in time, they're
already highlighting these things in the article anyway.
But so this is something that has become
far, far more relevant in our lives. Peter
Thiel, two, Jeffrey Epstein.
Both longer discussions.
This is 2014.
I would hold off on doing anything in
Spotify at $5,000,000,000.
There is some upside, especially in the m
and a scenario, but I'm not convinced it's
a great risk reward. Risk include
risks include Apple launching new products here, record
record labels being tougher on contract to go
renegotiations,
somewhat more bullish on Palantir,
but I think there's no need to rush.
We can discuss later in person. So realize,
this is Peter Thiel writing to Epstein.
Why would he be discussing somewhat bullshit on
Palantir? I think he's trying to elicit support
from Jeffrey Epstein.
I'm being offered a 100,000,000 to Spotify, 5,000,000,000,
which part of the way, there's already a
connection there.
I just find that interesting. Now, again, like
I said, these are just simple supplemental points
to what we were discussing today, but I
still found it relevant to what how how
clearly there's a connection between the two, but
how clearly Palantir has immersed itself into this
administration and the larger agenda rolling out.
Now remember
what they said before we got here. And
I really do think this is so incredibly
relevant.
Here's Trump, one of the 75 times they
told you this was all a hoax.
No. No. She's,
she's given us
just a very quick briefing. And in terms
of the credibility of the different things that
they've seen
and I would say that, you know, these
files were made up by Comey.
They were made up by Obama. They were
made up by the Biden info you know?
Come on. I mean, this has to start
breaking through to some people that have been
really resistant here. There's just I mean, you
can pretend he meant this and well, if
he meant that, he would have said that.
He said they're a hoax made up by
these people.
Yeah. I mean, there's only so many times
you can give a pass in language when
he says this over and over and over.
He's lying to you guys. We and we
went through years of that with the Russia
Russia Russia hoax, with all of the different
things that we had to go through. We've
got Jagan was a very clear manipulation. But
as we just highlighted in one other in
many ways, you could find the reality being
as a lot of us were saying at
the time, it was actually Israelgate.
And that's now even more represented in these
very files. Through years of it, but she's
handled it very well, and it's gonna be
up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible,
she should release. Yeah. Yeah. And then and
then he says how bad she is the
next thirty seconds when everyone else criticizes what
happens. So it's typical how he does, you're
the best and then I hate you because
I need to deflect onto you. That's what
he does.
Here, Ben Shapiro.
Classic. Right?
Doctor Simon Goedek. Half a year ago, Ben
Shapiro insisted there was no Epstein list. No
Epstein files. No human trafficking. He even mocked
Tucker Carlson and claimed Assad had nothing to
do with it. Now the files are out,
he's suddenly quite silent.
Thousands of hours of tape.
There are, by the way, but they are
child pornography. The reason the FBI is not
releasing them is because those tapes do not
include
underage people with third parties on Epstein Island.
That is not what the tapes are. Okay.
So they said anyway. Now I'm not even
saying I know any different, but my point
is I love how with absolute certainty tells
you that we know this is the case
because the administration told me.
This is like Tim Pool doing the same
thing, guys. It's embarrassing. Now I'd argue Ben
Shapiro is a little bit different, but at
the same time,
you become certain because it's in your interest
to become certain.
The bet the the honest way to report
this is this is what they're claiming, and
I think that's logical. But you see, he's
wrong right here. He's lying right here, but
he's so damn certain. You know the old
saying, fools and fanatics.
Yeah. I also have sources in the federal
government who are covering this stuff and have
seen the documents. Oh, yes. And let's trust
the government because they're always right. K. Those
tapes are just child porn. That's all. That's
what they are. That's why the FBI is
not releasing them. So the only way you
could know that is if you looked.
K. As far as the Epstein list, what
I have been told by my sources
is that the, there is no Epstein list.
That basically, there's a black book of Jeffrey
Epstein contacts. And the vast majority of those
contacts are already out there publicly. That's why
you know names like Oh, that's an easy
point then. Release the rest of them then.
Which is pretty Prince Andrew. What we've all
been saying. They love to make this bomb
out with, what, there's some single list somewhere?
Who ever even said that? It's about the
list that you can easily compile with the
information that you told us you have. And
what we want, Ben, is the rest of
those names. Why in the world would you
be defending not releasing the rest of the
names of the predators?
I mean, this is him doing his best
to dance his dance for the team,
And it's bad right now. If these people,
more than anyone else, are coming out of
this looking I mean, I don't know how
they recover. And this is my point about
some of the ones that, even though they're
in this position, still seem to magically grow
an influence because this is not about people
support. It's about the machine convincing you that
you're wrong because look at how many numbers
and views he's got. It's not what's going
on. Or Alan Dershowitz or some of the
names that have been mentioned here. Those contacts,
there is no evidence according to the DOJ
and the FBI. And guess what? They lied
because we just saw it today.
Think about how embarrassing that is. But this
is what they do, guys. And we'll end
with the with the most, I think, the
most bombastic one, the clumsiest one at the
very least.
And you know who that is.
Cash Patel.
I said, this is Jeff Carlson. Pam Bondi,
the obscene files are on my desk. Number
two, there are no obscene files. Number three,
there are too many files to review in
time for legal deadline.
I mean, there's so many ways that you
could juxtapose
their ridiculous for framing of all this. And
nobody honest can walk away thinking they were
just doing their best. That's insane to me.
So here's Kash Patel with one of the
most incredible lies that you could prove he
was lying about right then, and Massey called
him out for it. No credible information.
None. If there were, I would bring the
case yesterday
that he trafficked to other individuals. And the
in information we have again is limited. So
the answer is no one?
For the information that we have.
In the files? In the case file. Okay.
I just
traffic to no one is what we're being
told. You know what I mean? And and
that that gets gobbled up by the the
usual suspects because it's not about truth. It's
about team sport politics.
That can't be the way this goes forward,
guys. No. I think this is pretty damn
obvious. And more will come out. More people
will be diving through this. We'll report what
what, you know, we find to be relevant.
As always, you know, this is what I
do. I aggregate information for you. Sometimes that
represents conversations. Sometimes it represents a story I
investigate that I find to be more relevant.
Sometimes it breaks things out before anyone else
talks about them. But what I do is
simply try to collect what I think is
relevant for you. Take it or leave it.
It's up to you guys what you do
with that. And I think what's important for
us more than ever with this kind of,
you know,
socially engineered broken scenario we're in is information.
And sometimes,
that's false. Sometimes we'll lie to you. But
if you question everything,
sources,
information,
and consider it all,
it's really up to you whether you're deceived.
Because if you I mean, you could be
tricked in a sense where some you could
have everything lined up and it's and it
turns out to be a, like, literally fake
document or something like that. That happens that
can happen to anybody. But the point is
that you then still had things that you
thought proved it and you were just mistaken
as opposed to letting input complete information
guide you to a conclusion that you want
to be the case, which is just about
the entire conversation in the partisan media today.
So thank you for continued support, honest investigation.
So right now, hopefully, you guys can jump
over and go check out the rest of
the People's Reset and what Derek is doing
over there. You know, speaking of integrity and
honesty and principles,
few out there better than Derek Bro. So
thank you for tuning in today, supporting the
last American Vagabond. As we said, more coming
your way. Derek's gonna hey. We right after
the people's reset, we've got a few things
that we're looking into, some different projects that
we had discussed briefly, more IMA stuff coming
your way that we're planning. Tons of stuff
coming your way soon, guys. And there's two
things, one of which I've already referenced before,
but it's it's just about a timing issue,
but there's gonna be a new project coming
your way. But on top of that, there
was one other thing I was gonna mention.
I just slipped my mind that there was
another example of something I was gonna leave
you with. But anyway, there's lots coming your
way. Like I mentioned, there's some more articles
coming from some new people that will possibly
be coming out soon depending on how long
it takes them to write. And just, you
know, more more projects that are kind of
in the wings right now that might be
coming your way sooner than later. We're gonna
be following up with the UN whistleblower. You
have plenty of stuff coming your way, guys.
So thank you for tuning in. I love
you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.