It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thursday, 01/08/2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Quite a unfortunate series of events over the
last so many days. I mean, really,
how many times these things can pound and
how many times
Noam or Bondi or Trump or anybody else
can make the statements, even if you might
decide to think they're good intentioned, that will
essentially broadcast to the people doing these things,
go ahead and keep doing it. Right? We
stand behind you. Like, it's a weird way
to respond to something like this. To come
out and for example, for those that I'm
already getting in, for those that don't know
we're talking about, the shooting in regard to
today or yesterday into today discussing ICE and
the many different times this has happened.
But see seeing them cheer on the street
after something like this. You know, it it
it's a it's a certain sort of mindset
that's being instilled in people today. And the
reason I'm even saying this to start is
because, you know, we've talked a lot on
this show about
a transition taking place. And it's not just
in front of us politically,
societal,
governmental. It is, in my opinion, but it's
also mental. And what what's happening is there's
an effort to try to convince us in
like it's like we've covered on the show
our entire career
or, you know, our entire existence during my
career, of trying to get us to call
for what would otherwise meet the agenda.
That's not new. Today, it's on full display
and it's everywhere, you know, like we've gone
over many times. Promising you what we've always
called for with the plan to switch it
out for something else.
But
very important to get us to sort of
call for the very thing that would otherwise
be a major, major,
you know, just deviation from what we would
expect.
And I think it's really important to carry
that thought with with you always right now
to be able to see how that might
be the case or if you can prove
it playing out. But today in particular, as
we go through, to think about that major
point. Because even the shooting, even the ICE
conversation,
the discussion of constitutional rights, how that connected
to foreign policy. Remember how this started?
Khalil, Israel,
Ozturk.
Of course, then it became El Salvador, which
is definitely connected to the
so make sure there's no issues here.
Yeah. Let me let me know if you
guys are seeing this. I hope so. I
don't see any issue on my side.
But, you know, how this is all connected
to the larger agenda, discussing the the origin
point of, like I said, Bukele and sell
El Salvador connected to the network state conversation,
but also Venezuela, Biden, immigration,
the Insurrection Act. Like, it's,
you know, you could have just I mean,
right now, any narrative that's coming out is
all rationalized or rather,
the solution would be all of the same
things.
Good. Thank you, guys. And so we're gonna
talk about today and I I wanna I
decided I was kind of juggling or rather
just waffling over whether I should start with
the ice point today.
It's obviously a major incident, and it's very
important, and it needs to be discussed.
I mean, almost in primarily aside rather, primarily
because a US citizen was shot, because a
human being was killed.
But secondarily, just, you know, in a very
high level of importance,
we're talking about the dishonesty
on the face of the conversation. And what's
interesting is even as that is why it's
so important, it's also why I don't think
it's necessary for us there's, I think, a
lot of things I wanna set on the
table first because
I believe anybody who's honest can already see
what's going on with that. I I I
mean, unless I I just don't put enough
weight on the psychological manipulations going on out
there, but you can look at the video
for yourself. And even if you wanna argue
that you somehow think it's justified for this
person to shoot that car or the woman
in the car
because he thought he might have been hit.
And look, we can get into the reality
of why a cop has to respond the
split second time. I get that argument. But
we're gonna go we'll go into this when
we get into it all, about the real
I've got cops in my family. I understand
the dynamic. I understand, also, that it's a
a job for somebody who puts their life
at risk.
It's like it's like a fireman going, well,
I don't wanna go in there. I'm like,
it burned. You know? That's a ridiculous statement.
I'm not saying they should just be frivolous
or that we should allow them to be
heard all the time, but there is a
a level of risk. But then to always
use the hypothetically,
maybe there's a risk or that might have
gone the way it was gonna go, or
that might have turned out to be that
way, and then use that to just execute
people in the streets, well, we see where
this goes. And it is unjustified.
I mean, we we'll go through it. I
don't I always wanna jump all into, you
know, the the obvious points.
But I'm gonna start with the point that
Robert, an article he wrote today. Well, I
mean, to to some degree start, we're gonna
have a couple of the points first.
But it's really important. I'm just really he
does such an excellent job with this article,
and it it is something that I've been
talking about a lot. And in case you
guys don't know this,
the these are I mean, I'm not behind
the scenes cultivating their content and telling them
what I want to see in their articles.
That's not the way that I edit. I
tell all the people to write for this
platform. I want them to write about what
they find important and and the way that
they want to frame it. What you'll get
from my end is just making sure it's
grammatically correct, making sure that they're which I
I also miss plenty of times.
But, you know and then, of course, things
that I think need to be factually correct
and then occasionally something that we I wanna
include. But overall, it's not it's my point
in saying all this is that Robert took
a really interesting direction with the article he
wrote today about
what I see is a very clear globalist
overlap to what everything what our government's doing.
And it's not just our government, but how
that plays into foreign policy and how it's
right now being framed, as I kinda titled
today, as this government or this administration more
specifically fighting all of that. And I've it
just continues to be the most obvious representation
of what we all thought we were fighting
during COVID nineteen, the World Economic Forum, and
it's just all still coming out. And so
I'm gonna go over that article to set
the table for that kind of perspective, and
it relates to Israel,
Iran, and Venezuela.
And that very much then does relate to
ICE and what's happening on in this country.
So we'll get into all that today and
and a few other points that I think
are very relevant that we'll go over. But
I wanna start with something just to I
just use this to remind myself. This is
just the give and go we've had since
we've been under attack for my entire career,
but the it's a give send go. It
doesn't get much traffic, but if you wanna
support us, you can do so. Here's the
link. I'll include it in the show notes.
The reason I'm showing you this, I wanted
to remind myself to point out that Derek
and I decided, yesterday, we're gonna be doing
a fundraiser.
And we don't, you know, we we don't
do these very often. I I don't wanna
exhaust the, you know, the conversation. I mean,
I don't even like doing these in general.
I don't like marketing and selling ourselves. You
know me. I hate that.
But it's important because we're both in a
situation. In fact, it seems everybody
we know is in a very similar situation.
Everybody, not even that we work with, people
that we just in the field that we
recognize who you wouldn't expect are struggling right
now. And it's not just because
I mean, it's because of suppression. I mean,
that's my opinion, but this is there's a
lot of excellent people out there, wildly talented,
very well thought thought out and put together
platforms,
excellent editing, and and yet
borderline going out of business. But, again, most
people don't even know these things because this
is behind the scene conversation.
And I'm not I'm not gonna, you know,
air anybody's dirty laundry, but or it wouldn't
be that. But, you know, secrets or rather
just behind the scenes information. But you know
I'm very transparent with this. And we've been
attacked relentlessly. And we are still very much
I mean I mean, I I don't wanna
I'm gonna keep doing this. I always say
that because it's not like I'm trying to,
like, say, this will go away if you
don't support us because as much as that
might help donations, that's not the truth. I'm
gonna keep doing this, whether it's on me
and my cell phone, as I've jokingly said,
on my underwear, my room, sitting, you know,
whatever, just talking about whatever. I'm gonna keep
doing this. But this will continue to diminish
if we don't get support and so will
all the rest of the platforms out there
that need it. So we're gonna do a
fundraiser
to kinda talk about that, but also to
raise support or resources for both of our
platforms. So it's gonna be a conscious resistance
and and, the last American Vagabond
joint fundraiser.
And so we're gonna be aiming for the
sixteenth. I'm gonna be putting more about that
in the next couple of days. I'm gonna
be setting a link for it. I believe
I can do that ahead of time and
sit and get that out for you guys.
And it's gonna be sort of, it's not
really set time wise. I've it it's gonna
be up in the air how long we
go, but it's gonna be sort of a
day event where we do kinda what we
did last time and have people invited in.
You know, I I I always reference this.
In in, Hawaii, when I lived there for
a few,
over two years, there's a thing called the
Kuku Festival that Jack Johnson always put on.
And it was I always loved the idea
of it because it really just was called
Jack Johnson and Friends. And you really didn't
know who else was gonna go. There was
usuals you could expect, but he the as
the story goes, he just put out the
invite to everybody he knew. It was kind
of just a known idea and that any
people would just randomly show up and you'd
be like, Oh, my God. That person showed
up this time. And so the idea today
or for this discussion will be that we're
gonna invite anybody that we wanna have come,
just throw out the link to everybody, and
so it'll be kind of an unexpected event
for the day. And we have things we'll
plan. We have things we might give away
based on certain donations, plans for upcoming content.
But just so you guys know, that'll be
coming out soon. And it'll be a way
to raise awareness and also support the platform.
So that to start. And then one other
note I wanted to make about something going
on. I didn't know see this. Decentive News
sent me this.
Zionism Observer.
Now I don't know them personally, but I
I support their work. They fall we follow
each other, and I think they do great
work. They're calling out very important contentious things,
and, they're under attack. And this is an
interesting time reason. This is you know, there's
a lot of censorship going on, but this
is about their domain. And this is what
I've been worried about. This has happened. I
mean, I've been with True Stream Media. They
had the Daily Sheeple a long time ago.
I think they may still have it, but
that that was that they got their domain
taken a long time ago. But it hasn't
it hasn't happened like we might expect, like
this continual, you know, the new censorship. But
here we are. Namecheap has released their domain
recently, but they're now facing possible demonetization by
Buy Me A Coffee, which I've almost I've
had an issue with that in the past
and other platforms, and basically just shouting out
what they're dealing with. So I just wanna
point that out and think about the idea
of the future in which they can just
pull, you know, from the root,
domain names, you know, entire platforms, hosting. You
know? That's where this goes. And I'll include
their link, their kind of archive link to
all the work they're doing with tons and
tons and tons of verifiable content that you
can check out for yourself.
So let's start with some partisan stuff that
I do think is important
about Epstein, which is very clearly still important.
And almost almost the point when you recognize
when this all started in Venezuela was the
day that or at least one of the
days they were supposed to be releasing things
and did not. I don't think that was
the whole reason, but you could have argued
that's one more reason why they said, perfect.
Let's do it that day.
But overall too, just the I mean, we've
been saying this for a while. Right? Not
just the two party illusion, but in particular
post 2025 forward or after 2025,
that I I've been saying for a while
that I think conservatives are very much
just not buying it anymore. And it's the
same thing I said before with, you know,
the COVID nineteen overlap, and I think we
were proven correct.
It's not because it's once it it's because
people are just not buying it. People are
starting to see through classically held manipulations or
beliefs, I was gonna say, but just, you
know, a lot of things that we haven't
you know, just vaccines as a whole, the
conversation, or things like we've like any number
of examples through the current administration where you
never would have expected people who are diehard
supporters to just go, Yeah, I'm not supporting
him anymore. This just doesn't feel right. It's
interesting, it's important, and it shows you
what I guess I'm trying to stress is
let's not take this as a partisan thing.
This is about average people who are and
are not, depending on whether are in one
part of it or not, partisanship or not,
support Trump, maybe not, are just generally starting
to see through it and call this stuff
out. And I think that's the reactive nature
of what we're seeing in the government.
Because if you don't have this game, the
censorship manipulation, like think ADL Greenblatt saying it's
it's not a left right problem. It's an
age problem. Right? That how do you deal
with that if your entire system is built
on divide and conquer, on censorship? Right? But
now we have a point where people are
by. I think it's worth thinking about. So
here's Simon Godek
pointing out that that's just this we're gonna
get to a couple points about that. But
this is a point about Dan Bongino. And
he says, be conservative commentator. He's kind of,
like, listing his time frame. Build huge audiences
talking about Epstein. Epstein didn't kill himself. Hinted
blackmail.
You know, all the different things.
Protection and so on. Audiences eat it up.
Become FBI director. Now it's case closed. Suddenly,
Epstein didn't kill himself, which he said. Claims
there are no Epstein files, which he said.
Documents eventually get released. Massive redactions everywhere. Nothing
new learned. No accountability, no names, leave government,
go back to podcasting, restart outrage cycle, act
like the middle part never happened.
That's I mean, that's what's happening. He's out
there acting like the Epstein. I mean,
it's just kinda sad that we're in a
position where people like this can
say one thing, do another, and then just
go right back to the routine. But because
we live in this false kind of theater
driven world right now, it doesn't even matter,
at least to a lot of people. But
I don't believe that's the majority, like I
was saying a second
ago. I think that the majority of people
are now going, these people are lying to
us. But as always, the mainstream alternative media
circle is highlighting the people who are not
really the majority as the full picture. By
the way, like the corporate media has been
doing us doing to us our entire lives.
Now on top of that,
the sixth Epstein files might not be released
in full until Trump leaves office, which basically
means never, guys. That's how this goes. This
drip release kind of never ending, maybe next
year, give us a month, one more redaction
until we just stop paying attention, until it
just stops getting talked about.
Many people are refocusing elsewhere now because this
is becoming old news. But, I mean, this
is insane. Like, this is a huge, huge
this was the central part of what they
said they were gonna accomplish. And really not
they didn't say Epstein files, but it was
about pedophilia and revealing the deeper secrets of
the democrat. And here we are where they're
now completely
I mean, they've broken the law. Let's be
real about that. Very obviously. And here's Massey
to point that out or next to
judge, Judd Legum simply says the d a
the DOJ is not releasing
has not released 99%
of the Epstein files in direct violation of
the law, which it is. It doesn't matter.
I mean, you could make an argument for
why that shouldn't apply, but let's acknowledge it
is a violation of the law as it
currently stands, they claim the delay is necessary
to review the files. However, the DOJ previously
claimed the review was complete in July, which
they did. This is my point, guys. This
is just everyone anywhere who cares to look
can already see this. I mean, that is
gonna be a redundant point, but we have
to realize
if you stand back and go, like with
COVID, that look, everyone kinda sees this right
now. That has to change the way we
engage with everything. Because if we engage with
it as if, you know, though the Democrats
just don't see it or the Republicans are
always it's not the truth. It's just not.
And we're falling into the traps they're creating
using the partisanship.
So here's Massie. Quote, the biggest problem isn't
that they're missing deadlines. It's what they're redacting,
which we already know. They've been they've redacted
names of child predators. That was very clearly
broken down. They've redacted Trump's name, at least
16 or 600 times.
They're trying to pretend the privacy act overrides
a law that explicitly says you can't withhold
records to prevent embarrassment.
Wild. Now next is, something he recently said.
This is Massey on the Epstein files. If
this were a private law firm with 5%
of the resources of the DOJ, this would
have been done by the deadline, which is
actually an easy point to make. They just
missed another deadline to report all of the
poo all of the politicians in their files,
and they're supposed to justify all of their
redactions. The biggest problem isn't that they're missing
deadlines, it's that they're redacting. Here's what he
said.
The fact that these Epstein files still there
are millions of more documents that they're still
reviewing at this point. You know, if this
were a private
law firm with 5% of the resources to
the DOJ, This would have been done by
the deadline.
And they just missed another deadline, which is
to report to congress, which is supposed to
list all the politicians that are in their
files. And, also,
they're supposed to justify all the redactions fifteen
days after the first thirty day window. But
the Just that's important. Don't miss that. That
means that they've already passed the time frame
when they were supposed to justify the previous
redactions. They haven't done that either. That's a
small thing that will I mean, it's not
small, but in the context of everything, that's
gonna get forgotten. It's gonna get dropped. Then
we're never I mean, we should always be
able to go back and be like, you
never did this, but they're they need to
go, this is why we did x, y,
and z, at least to them. I doubt
that'll ever happen. Meaning, they just covered up
for very big criminals, and we're never gonna
find out why. The the biggest problem isn't
that they're meet missing the deadlines.
It's what they're redacting.
So they're citing the privacy act, and they're
trying to pretend like that overrides a law
that we just passed that says you can't
withhold records to prevent embarrassment.
They're also citing FOIA standards,
which don't apply to our law
when they're trying to say that they don't
have to release internal decisions. But our bill
specifically says release internal decisions.
So what are you gonna do about it?
We're looking at that.
It's pretty clear. Right? I mean, so you
could prove this is the way if it
says that they're supposed to release their dialogue,
right, in their inner decision making and they
don't, well, that's not a secret. And it's
obvious why they're doing that because they don't
want you to know. And if I mean,
if it was just simply, well, you know,
victims, like they continue to pretend while accidentally
releasing victims' names, then that would be simple,
wouldn't it? I mean, this is just self
explanatory, guys. And this is important.
As much as the the the desperate few
who you could always point out are really
trying to make you think this is irrelevant,
a democrat lie, you're not a republican if
you talk about this, and you know who
we're talking about. And they are like a
sore thumb sticking out right now.
Laura Loomer comes out, and this is the
this is a perfect example of that.
It says, Massey is basically a Democrat.
I mean, it's just the stupid like, look.
If you understand the reality of Democrat, Republican,
and and the core issues, they're not that
different at the end of the day despite
narrative.
But when you look at what they would
argue a Republican should do and I've brought
this image up before. Look at the Republican
party line,
and then look at how much I mean,
Massey adheres to that more than almost anybody.
Well, more than all the America First politicians.
So how in the world are you gonna
call a democrat? Look at what the democrats
do. He's not even near that.
So she's just a desperate hair on fire.
He's you know, don't look at him, Massey,
because he makes us all look like clowns.
And I'm not even saying that's because you
should trust him. I I question and doubt
everybody, but I will point out that his
continued principled stances and follow through will make
me day by day support him more.
This is just somebody who clearly has an
agenda to go, you're not
he what he does right now makes the
people like her who scream America first look
like absolute hypocrites,
and they know that.
Says, loomer unleashed. Jasmine Crockett, one of the
leaders of the house Democrats, has reposted Massey's
post that calls to question the legality of
Trump's decision. Right. So because a Democrat shares
what he says, which is accurate and correct
and verifiable, therefore, he democrat. Therefore, you're an
idiot. This is exactly what this person says.
You're basically an idiot. It's just sad, guys,
and these people are huge.
2,000,000 followers.
Now, again, in no way does that mean
respect, does that mean I mean, anything other
than influence on this platform. But it does
very much carry over as we see the
corporate media, seemingly, despite years of telling you
this is all social media people in their
basements, now suddenly using this to dictate who
is important
because it's always been a part of the
game, guys.
Top of that, don't forget don't miss this
story. This is also gonna fall behind. Now
where are all the conservatives?
All the you know, there are honest plenty
of them out there. And, again, if you
understand behind the scenes, I think it's most
of them. But the people in the inner
circle up there, the Joneses of the world,
where are you guys? Didn't we care about
January 6? Wasn't the whole point that we
were supposed to arrest people because they yeah.
What about that? Guess what? Well, they want
they got someone arrested, but it's not the
guy, and they don't care about that. So
clearly, they don't care about actual accountability. Or
Nancy Pelosi, it seems. They just wanted a
figure,
an illusion.
Right? We got the guy. Move on. Stop
paying attention. We got Robinson. Stop looking. Right?
This is what they seem to do right
now.
Joe points out defense demands
pipe bomber suspect Brian Cole Junior be immediately
released due to no preliminary hearing and no
valid indictment.
This seem look. This appears to me, now
this is early, to be something that's going
to almost be designed to not go anywhere,
just like everything else Kash Patel has done.
And, really, just The US the
current administration of the US government that seems
to pull his strings. Because, really, if you
look at James Comey and Leticia James and
even Bolton appears or any number of the
cases we've talked about, the shooting in the
Dallas office or the supposed Halloween plot or
the New Year's Eve plot for crying out
loud, These things are completely
a joke.
It doesn't mean they will they won't force
through some kind of a, a charge, but
I doubt it will be anything they're screaming
at the podium, like we're gonna get into
the shooting of of the ice,
the ice,
officer shooting the US citizen, and now Noam
calls her a domestic terrorist. And even if
everything they're saying is true, the to jump
to that level is a joke.
It should be laughed at.
But his continued attention is illegal, says the
defense attorney, of course. But here, Massey says
the judge should release autistic.
Of course he's autistic. January 6 pipe bomber
suspect, Brian Cole. No credible motive.
Present present,
presents danger to no one, flimsy evidence, no
priors, willing to wear a tracker under house
arrest, family will vouch, and BOJ botched the
legal work, irreparable harm to him otherwise.
Let's not forget that as Massey points out,
all the information we have, the gate move,
everything relates to a potential,
Capitol police officer. Here we are though. Pick
the ant the autistic guy who can't put
up a defense. This is typically what we've
seen in the past.
Here's Owen Schroer just pointing out what I'm
this is a couple quick points to show
you that there's may people out there that
are just not buying anymore.
He says, how do we go from this
to that?
Marjorie Taylor Marjorie Taylor Greene, who still stands
by most of the things that Trump said
he was gonna do, now she's the bad
guy because she calls him out for it,
And then next to Mark Levin.
Biggest downgrade ever, he says.
Here is the QAnon Shaman.
Remember this guy? Huge Trump supporter. Massive. Like,
major he was at the at January 6,
the whole thing. Right?
CNN.
You stole Trump's supporter?
He says, no. I thought you knew that.
Why not? Refusing to release the Epstein client
list was enough for me and a lot
of other people. Like, okay. This is BS.
There you go. Now that doesn't mean he's
right. He could be wrong. Maybe he's missing
something. Maybe it'll all come out. But what
I'm trying to show you is that average
people, whether you think that's who he is
or not, but just a lot of con
conservatives are just like, this is too much.
I don't believe in this anymore. And that's
a really good thing if you understand where
we actually are.
Now here's a couple other points before we
get into,
or, Robert's article and then Iran and Venezuela
really quickly.
This is interesting to me. Orwell shared this
with me. Nome announces the 2,600,000
illegals. Now let's start by saying, by the
way, that they say a lot of stuff
that just flatly isn't true, and you can
usually prove that. Just keep in your mind
that maybe these numbers aren't correct. I know
that would be shocking. But announces that 2,600,000
illegals have left our country since Trump took
office, including,
and she cites this, so this is the
the other number, you know, probably fudged for
a lot of reasons, but she just excites
explicitly
or specifically, excuse me, 650,000
who were arrested, detained, and deported.
And 2,000,000 who self deported. Oh, actually, you
know what? I grabbed the wrong number. That's
hilarious. Hold on. Let me do it again
since they got the calculator. I actually did
650.
The point is 2,000,000 who self deported. Right?
And she points out here,
they were paying $3,000
for people who self deported by December 31.
Now again, this is there's often there's factors
up in the air. Right? People who self
deported without being paid or just, you know,
whatever. But just recognize the amount of money
this could potentially represent. I think it looks
it's set to so up in the air
for a lot of reasons. Let's just take
650,000
even though it's actually almost, you know, what,
three, four times that if you wanna really
be honest about it. 2,000,000, she says.
That comes to almost $2,000,000,000.
And that's just that's and that's clearly I
mean, that's probably a good representation seeing as
how she's saying 2,000,000 and we're only doing
about 650,000.
But that's a lot of money to pay
people to do something which would otherwise would
have been done for free, or rather, technically,
the process would would cost us taxpayer dollars.
But there's a ton of process around all
this anyway, and then they're spending, what, $2.04,
$6,000,000,000
to pay them to leave, if that's what
happened? Just make it a point, really. That's
wild. And on top of everything else, Doge
and all the lies, no, not cutting costs,
government getting bigger, your costs increasing,
at some point we gotta go, which I
think everyone's doing, we're being lied to.
And then this point's interesting.
US, this is why I was pointing to
that, US is considering paying, considering, so it's
not a 100% yet, Paying Greenlanders
10,000 to a $100,000
each to support secession from Denmark.
What is happening? Like, how in the world
are we at a point where the US
government, or at least Trump and his team,
think that it makes sense to be like,
hey, guys. We'll bribe you to revolt.
To literally I mean, wouldn't Trump call this
treason
if an American citizen was like, yeah. Pay
me $1,000.
I'll I'll secede. I'll I'll, I'll support leaving
the US government. They would call that terrorism
right now. They would they call if they
stub their toe hard, they call it terrorism
today. So here we are, where they're literally
talking about paying people in Denmark to agree
to do something which would be illegal in
every possible sense. To just seize Denmark and,
well, they are we're paying them to be
okay with it, so that makes it legal.
I mean, this and so that's the point
is just the illegitimacy of everything they're doing,
the illegality of everything they're doing. But on
top of that,
what taking Greenland? And then on top of
that,
money? All the money we're saving is gonna
keep spending? How much would that amount to?
Another billion dollars? So just think about how
all of this amounts to the larger picture.
Is this America first? Is this amount to
anything other than a globalist intent to control
more territory and and exert exert your will
over it? Which is the only real definition?
Pretty clearly. Now here, it's just the overlaps
I'll include. And this isn't the only point,
but I think it's important that this is
from, February.
Startup link to Peter Thiel wants to build
the next great city in Greenland. Now this
one goes back a ways where he brought
this up wanting Greenland for this reason, but
you could argue that was the driving force
as I've said before. Here Orwell shared this
with me. Trump ally who inspired Greenland purchase
idea quietly invest in Greenland Greenlandic companies.
Even if it's just money, these people are
vultures. These are it's it's incredibly obvious. And
if you think that's different than Biden's administration,
you're not paying attention. These guys are just
on the face about it. But I do
think this is a driving factor. The network
state agenda, it's all part of this bigger
picture of changing the way society operates for
the benefit of them. And, of course, you
could argue that means the benefit of everybody.
I simply disagree.
Now this is a really great article. I
just wanna stress that again. Robert did a
great job on this. And and it's the
bigger picture that we'll get into in the
latter part of the of the article that
I think really brings this together. But first,
let's just get into the regime change tactics
and how clear this is right now. From
Caracas to Tehran, how Trump's Venezuela
invasion serves Israel's geopolitical
agenda.
Now it says The US attack on Venezuela
on January 3, remember the same day that
one of those deadlines were for the Epstein
files, killed at least 40 Venezuelans.
They don't talk about this, by the way,
as if those lives are just meaningless.
That's on top of the 32 or more
Cuban nationals who were also killed.
No war, though. You know, just a casual
event. You know, it's clearly, that's a massive
war crime on top of the fact that
it is an act of war for every
possible reason. The killing, the invasion, the
extra the extradition of their leader. It's just
wild to even pretend it's not.
There can be no doubt, he writes, that
what occurred was a violation of the United
Nations Charter, specifically article two section four. That
said, having established that the primary goal of
the operation, at least as the state, as
they'll state, was the control of Venezuelan oil,
the largest proven reserves on Earth, the implication
of this act extends well beyond the nation
itself. Because in their stated intention, they do
say secure the oil. But I'll I'll clearly
point out that there's many more factors at
play here, and maybe saying the oil was
a way to keep us from looking at
those other factors.
Clearly, the oil plays a good factor in
this. Maybe the primary one as Robert makes
an excellent,
argument
for why that may be the case. Things
that I hadn't even considered.
Now he he goes on to say,
where were we?
There is a reason why Israeli prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu has been such a vocal proponent
of regime change in Caracas,
Venezuela, as has as have Israel lobby linked
think tanks like the Foundation for Defense Defense
of Democracy.
This is the same Zionist crowd, by the
way, that pushed for wars in Iraq, Syria,
Libya, and beyond. Yeah. You can play the
list of seven countries five years in Netanyahu's
book. Like, it's all the same conversation. All
of these things relate to Israel's larger agenda,
Greater Israel and others.
That doesn't mean it's the only reason, if
not the reason. But it is a factor
from Israel's perspective for why they might drive
this, lobby this. It's important to think about
it. But I very much do think that's
the driving factor, my personal opinion. The reason
is clear. He writes, all these operations benefit
Israel. Donald Trump's declarations regarding Venezuelan oil are
important for the Israelis. Not only was Iran
an ally of of Nicolas Maduro, but the
robbery of the nation's oil
will help The United States and Israel circumvent
a possible oil crisis in the event of
a major war against the Islamic Republic. We
just talked about that. We've mentioned it many
times over the years. Thank you again for
whoever just, asked me to do that in
the live show the other day because it
was important.
Then we've talked about the Ba'al Ahmed upgrade.
We've talked about Oman. We've talked about Yemen.
We've talked about, you know, The UAE. We've
talked about Somalia, Somaliland.
All of these, at least in part, are
in because of that of that
desire to control these waterways.
In this case, what they're pointing out on
top of that, rather in case cases of
that unclear,
the the desire to control these areas are
because of those straits and the and the
the shipping lanes through there. And the need
to control it because Iran could potentially shut
down the Strait Of Hormuz in the event
of an attack, which, by the way, they
haven't the last few times that they've been
attacked, even though they said they would. But
who knows? They can pull that card whenever
they'd like. And that would then
drastically affect
the world, but in particular,
The US, Saudi Arabia, Israel.
So
taking this oil, which they're doing and have
can already begun,
is interesting to think about that it very
well could be just a safeguard, a safety
net for if that should happen. And now
they can attack Iran.
That's just the simple first point, and that's
a very good point to consider. Now it
goes and then that's just the oil, by
the way. We know the rare earth minerals
plays into the AI direction, plays into any
number of electronic, you know, globalist, elitist, technocratic
agendas.
But on top of that, you've got gold,
wealth,
geostrategic
control. There's tons of things. Now one of
the biggest cards that Tehran holds in the
event of war, as he writes, is that
they will close off the Strait Of Hormuz,
meaning that the Arab Gulf nations would no
longer be able to export oil from the
Persian Gulf area. Now that's not I mean,
it would be more difficult.
But I would argue that his point is
simply that that would be in conjunction with
other things, but at the end of the
day, it's a huge factor. An, another up
option
Iran has is to simply target the oil
facilities at their source.
Now it says by seizing control of Venezuela's
oil resources, The US can not only provide
a solution to such a crisis, but even
in the absence of war so say there's
not an issue with Iran, they can still
leverage The US, the oil supplies
of the Latin American nation, and use them
for future agendas. For example, this would give
the Trump administration
greater sway over Saudi Arabia, right, for negotiations,
for coercion rather. The the major concession that
Washington seeks from Riyadh and Saudi Arabia is
for it to sign the so called Abraham
Accords and normalize ties with Tel Aviv, something
that Saudis
have so far refrained from doing, insisting that
a Palestinian state be established first. Frankly, that
I don't think that's genuine for what they've
done everywhere else, but still what they stayed.
So
where was that? The
I was one thing I was gonna say
there. So seizing control of the resources The
US can not only provide a solution to
such a crisis, but in the event of,
oh, well, the point was simply that not
only are they seizing the oil,
in many ways, tankers, they just seized them
another tank. Tankers, by the way, that don't
even apply to what they claim they're doing.
But on top of that,
the actual industry, as they've made very clear,
right, bringing in oil companies, working with the
VP and others, we'll get into that in
a second, and ultimately creating that industry through
them and forcing Venezuela to do what they
want, which is what they're currently doing, as
we'll get into as well. You have to
buy only US goods. You can only do
I mean, yeah. But hashtag democracy. They're laughing
at everybody, guys, and they know what they're
showing the world. We can do what we
want. Shut up.
Yeah. Try try us. Right? We'll scrape democracy
right down your throat. That's that's what they're
gonna do.
And it says, it is important to keep
in mind that greater control of the United
States government
translates to immediate gains for the Israelis, who
remain who remains its closest ally and largest
recipient of foreign aid. Washington and Tel Aviv
are clearly pursuing a joint agenda. Now that's,
again, these points are often pushed back because
of, like, some perceived conspiracy theory. Whether you
think that's what drives the thought or not,
that's a self evident thought. It's proven. You
can really you can I mean, they're stating
their joint agenda and objectives here? So it's
important to make sure we're clear about that
and not shy away from certain topics because
people will assume the worst. The fall of
a, of a sovereign Venezuela also fits into
a new Israeli project, the Isaac Accords.
And, essentially, we're talking about the, as it
says, was, initially launched,
between one of the foreign ministers of Israel
and, Javier Millet, of course.
And it's basically another extension of the Abraham
Accords, target Muslim majority Arab nations. You know,
it's really just the same kind of dynamic.
And it says,
where was I?
Right there. The region is also key to
Israel, which has faced some of its fiercest
diplomatic opposition since October 7.
Now that's important to think about is that
pretty much the entirety of the global South
is pushing back against what Israel is doing.
And in many legal ways as well, which,
clearly, this is in their interest to stop
these governments from doing that. Because they're I
mean, they've lost. The world sees this. The
the warrants are out. But, of course, if
they can just topple topple government after government
to get them to start saying something else,
well, there's no enforcement arm anymore.
And it says, for example, the for the
first the first 15 nations to file interventions
in favor of South Africa's genocide suit against
Israel,
seven of them were in the Latin American
countries. All the ones they're focusing on, by
the way. Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua, Colombia, Bolivia, Chile.
It's like it's the whole list.
And it says, if we take a a
brief look at the region now, Bolivia has
since lost its leftist government through the electoral
process, of course, as of recently, as well
as, of course, documented election interference by the
US government that led to Eva Morales being
forced or, I guess, forced to flee and
then put in a military junta, which they
called democracy, and they backed away. And, of
course, through that, it gets less attention. They
have continued to manipulate situation. As Elon Musk
famously said about Bolivia, we'll coup whoever we
want. Get to lithium.
I mean, it's it's very transparent what they're
doing.
And it says, it it continues as as
has Chile, by the way, also lost its
government, with both on the way to being
taken over by right wing pro US leaderships.
The recent fall of Venezuela directly threatens the
heavily sanctioned economy of Cuba. Colombia, Nicaragua, and
Cuba remain under the direct threat of US
led regime change efforts. As of right now,
even Mexico,
as you've seen, has been publicly threatened. Although
it does not appear as if a coup
or invasion is imminent, they've repeatedly pointed that
out that they're next, that they're on the
list. We could better watch out. You
know,
Claudia,
I think it's Scheidbaum. You know, you're just
basically calling her out for certain things they
didn't agree to or, you know, at the
end of the day, it's transparent that it
comes down to doing what the US government
wants. They just pretend that's always the same
thing as what's correct. As what they want
is always the same thing as what's legal
or morally acceptable. It's not. In fact, it's
usually the opposite from what we can see.
But so in this case, if they
militarily invade or force the government to do
what they think, then they just go, well,
that's what the world wants. Right? That's democracy.
It's just not. Even if you agree, even
if the outcome will eventually be that, doing
it that way is illegal.
You know, it's it's just it it it
doesn't ever go that way. Look at our
own history, guys. That's the argument is they
people argue that that has to happen because
of where we are. Okay. Well, then point
out an example of where that's ever ended
up, even from Trump's administration,
benefiting anybody other than the elitist in his
circle.
You won't find one.
It it says US secretary of state Marco
Rubio, who plays a key role in guiding
the Trump administration's foreign policy, is a Cuban
American who has a personal agenda in seeking
the overthrow of governments in at the government
in in Cuba. Rubio is also the recipient,
of course, of over $1,000,000 in Israel lobby
funds, but no big deal. Doesn't play a
factor there.
Israel's involvement with US backed right wing dictators
in Latin America is nothing new. For example,
Israel was a primary supplier of weapons to
the regime of the infamous Chilean dictator dictator
August, Augusto Pinochet.
And by the way, it's it's insane if
you look through the background and you just
pick out the worst people that have existed
in our history and find how shockingly obvious
it is that Israel and United States just
so happened to be working with them. It's
so happened to arm them. It's so happened
to drive their agenda.
Rwanda, Bosnia. I mean, it's just incredibly obvious.
But you're racist if you point out the
obvious. And so here is another example. Pinochet
was a monster who they put in place
and they supported.
Of course, he came to power as a
result of a US backed coup against the
country's popular socialist leader,
sa, Salvador
Allende. Now remember,
socialism bad, therefore we're gonna put in a
guy that just is a despotic monster, but
as long as it's better than socialism. Well,
guess what? That sounds familiar.
They're so the lesser of evils, pick him
because she's just so bad. Well, probably they're
both just as bad. Doesn't change the fact
that you're still getting evil, guys, and they
will play this forever. Are we to pretend
that those are the only two people possible
of being elected? What do people in the
country actually want? Well, they don't matter because
they're borderline terrorists until we have the person
we want in place. Just ask Palestinians.
You know? It's it's dishonest at the core.
Even after The US eventually imposed an arms
embargo on Pinochet's regime in 1976,
following the mass slaughter of tens of thousands
of his own people and various other rights
abuses, there's whole lot to get into to
decide, you know, whether or not that was
them, you know, they're just covering their actions
or him not going along with the plan,
which is always what happens in history.
Every time they work with one of these
monsters, eventually these people wear out their usefulness
or stop wanting to be controlled. They get
rid of them and use somebody else. Ask
Saddam Hussein. Ask Osama Bin Laden. Ask any
number of people that they've done exactly that
with. And the biggest boogie man in the
world was thirty seconds ago a US ally
or agent.
Where was I? Because I keep losing my
place.
And, you know, and so be after the
mass slaughter of tens of thousands of his
own people and rights abuses, the guy they
put in place
illegally, Israel continued to not only supply weapons
for him way after that atrocity,
but became its top supplier.
Sort of like with Rwanda and every other
situation where you can find that they're the
ones that were arming and stoking the problem.
Not alone, mind you, but in many of
these cases, predominantly.
And it says even providing intelligence and training
for the regime's forces, Pinochet.
The newly elected president of Chile, Jose Antonio
Cast, is a an open admirer
of Pinochet. He's the president-elect today. Open admirer
of Pinochet, as well as just so happens
to be the son of a former Nazi
party member, but no big deal. They're okay
as long as they're in support of Israel.
Doesn't that make sense? A former Nazi party
family member, someone who supports one of the
worst dictators we know of, but he supports
The US agenda in Israel, so we just
ignore that. Right? Here's Saudi Arabia. It opened
a a authoritarian dictatorship, but they're okay because,
you know, they support us.
That's really how this goes, and that is
it's it's self explanatory.
Israel has trained, advised, and supplied weapons to
right wing groups and regimes across Latin America.
I link right there to the Azov movement,
which is one of those conversations that you've
seen in case you just don't know that.
This this this goes back to the articles
2,018. You guys have seen it more than
once in the show, where it talks
about rights groups in Israel are demanding Israel
stop arming neo Nazis. Now that may seem
ridiculously and confounding or ridiculous and confounding if
you don't know the history, but it's not.
It's actually pretty common for Israel to fund
the very people they claim they're fighting, just
like The United States, which is where the
agenda comes from, in my opinion.
Nazi ideology cite evidence that the right wing
Azov militia, who they're funding.
This goes back a long way, guys.
As well as regimes all across Latin America.
Israel's continued to fund, so is The United
States, including in and there's an our link
to the actual breakdown of these information, so
as always, you can verify it for yourself.
Argentina,
Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, The Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama,
Paraguay, Peru, and Venezuela.
You know? Just a few.
And these things are all verifiable, but we're
questioning today whether they're doing the same thing
yet again. Bolton literally wrote a book about
how many times they tried to do this,
but we all question it. Meanwhile, which we
should question everything, right? It's not what I'm
saying. The point is that when you have
proof of something,
it becomes unnecessary
to stand back and go and I mean
proof, not evidence. Evidence can be falsified, but
proof, which means it's definitive, which is where
we are with almost every one of these
things. Meanwhile, popular left wing movements across the
region have typically allied themselves with the Palestinian
cause. Now that does not mean good,
correct,
you know, legal,
but it means that they're the ones that
have allied with the Palestinian cause and the
resistance force to it and
are largely framed as bad because of that
alone.
Now in regime change in Iran,
this entirely organic series of protests was hijacked.
Now this he he cites his article in
this, which he just recently put up for
TLAB. Israel launches its latest Iran revolution as
Trump threatens war. And So read this if
you wanna get into the deeper understanding of
how very clearly this was something that started
organic, which is usually how this goes. And
he the unions backed them. He'll describe this
here. And then
just like we see in The United States,
which is something I really want you to
think about in this article for where we
are in this country. They're doing this to
you right now. You have a protest and
you got black clad people that run up
and it's not just left or right, guys.
Clearly, it's happening in the entire conversation. Any
American pushing back against the government. They come
up and they start causing violence and they
cause you terrorists and then you they use
to justify what they want. In this
case, Iranians were protesting.
The collapse of the rial, obviously, because we
can clearly see US sanctions doing that, they
can acknowledge that, but they also, as we
as Robert points out, have criticism with the
way Iran handled that situation. And so they're
upset for many reasons because their money's they
don't they it's collapsing.
So they're protesting
organically.
And then publicly talking about it with the
people that interview, we don't want anybody coming
in outside. We don't want we wanna deal
with our we wanna express our protest, which
Robert points out in the last article,
almost I mean, very consistently in the past
has led to people being fired, has led
to,
changes in policy. When's the last time you
saw it happen in The United States?
Again, that's not good, bad, or right, wrong.
It's just an example showing you that at
least they lie about these governments. And in
many cases, they do things that we wouldn't
even see here.
But plenty of bad things too. We can
very clearly call out. But this started organic.
Protests were immediately hijacked or very quickly. Iranian
opposition media and Israeli propagandists
began disseminating old, out of context footage,
or old and or out of context footage,
and, AI generated videos. Now the last show,
it was just I mean, I could have
gone on for hours. Alex Jones, Benny Johnson,
Nick Sorter,
what's that new guy? You know? They're just
all doing it.
All of them getting caught. Can like, repeatedly.
Wall Street Apes, memes, therefore I am. All
these major accounts constantly sharing and resharing and
repeating
very I mean, I don't remember. I can't
actually see a single example. I'm sure it's
out there. I guarantee you there's a protest
out there. People who support it, they could
they could even pay people to do that.
But, weirdly enough, the only ones that we
were getting, and everyone's pointing this out, were
people like that. The Joneses of the
world, repeatedly sharing provenly false information. AI generated
videos that even Twitter called out. And so,
they lied about it.
All and since almost out of nowhere, rioters
and armed militias began popping up across the
country.
The rioters have been caught online and even
filmed themselves doing so, opening fire on security
forces because they wanted that to be seen.
That's the point.
Why you have to think about why they
would film that. It's about trying to create
the narrative that Iranians are firing on the
government because they're just so ready to for
regime change or whatever the narrative is. They
have also attempted, but so far failed, to
seize armories, police stations, government buildings. Think about
why. This is very clearly as he'll I'll
let him explain. Homes, cars, stores, mosques, and
even copies of the Quran have been frequently
burnt by the rioters, which again is the
point about if the if MAGA was protesting
the government and they started burning American flags,
you'd be like, that just doesn't make any
sense. They don't support the government, but they
very clearly believe in the American flag. And
so in this case, you've got people just
like that. You've got Iranians who you see,
what they're trying to do is make it
go back to the Shah and the weird
interim thing they did at post Operation Ajax
before they were back overthrown.
That's a fraction of the history, and they
pretend like that's the whole representation of the
country.
That's not the reality, guys. They support, and
you can ask them. You can do your
own due diligence.
When they start burning the Quran and other
things and those I'll also point out one
more thing. Not everybody in this country is
Muslim. Not every country believe this matters,
or every person,
but it very clearly is the majority. And
so when you see that by the very
people who are being called out by the
rest of them, it says something. And it's
about trying to signal to the world
that the loomers of the world are correct.
Right? The Muslims are bad, and everybody hates
them. It's just it's just nonsense. And in
fact, it's getting no popular mo movement.
Interesting.
And it says, well, some o operatives plastered
over local street signs, making this even more
clear, replacing them with Trump banners.
Of course, because that makes sense. Right? The
the guy who's bombed your country, the guy
who's assassinated one of your most cherished leaders.
Yeah. Let's let's support him.
As covered in his previous article, The Last
American Vagabond, these riots are far from organic.
Anti Iran social media accounts have even produced
collages
of civilians
alongside the names of individuals claiming they were
murdered by the Iranian security forces. Now wouldn't
you imagine that would be easy to prove
if any of what you're saying is true?
Well, it turns out those many of these
individuals later
went online and made it clear that those
were fake and that they're still alive and
that didn't happen. We already showed you an
example of them trying to claim they were
torturing people and that turned out to be
a movie from an image from a movie
on Netflix. I mean, this is Israeli propaganda.
We saw the same thing during the ongoing
genocide, by the way. Sharing video, you know,
what was that? A a a thing from
Amazon, the term name was claiming were chemical
weapons instructions? Like, they got caught repeatedly. It's
the same lazy propaganda.
And this is in addition to all of
this, videos have emerged of a truckload.
With and I want you to think about
this. Think of the stones and the Capitol
and all the different things we talked about.
A truck
videos have emerged of a truck loaded with
stones
suddenly appearing to drop off its cargo to
riot for rioters to use.
One such case was reported in Shiraz, after
which the unidentified
truck suddenly took off. This, along with random
attacks involving guns, knives, and improvised explosives, all
demonstrate a pattern of well prepared campaign. But,
you know, the the the truck overlap with
the stones, it feels very reminiscent to what's
happening to us in this country.
And you you can make it about, like,
the left somehow doing that. It's it's it
is illogical when you break down all the
information.
We're all being played, and it's happening on
left and right. It's happening anytime we're calling
out the larger agenda, wherever side you think
you're on.
Anyone pretending this is somehow organic, he writes,
now that the union's backing the shopkeepers,
their demonstrations and the original peaceful protest movements
have been completely subsided,
they they've come out publicly and said, look.
This is not the same thing. These people
are not the protesters. We don't support it
anymore. It's very clear, which shows you that
a core part of Iranian society does not
buy it right now Because they've been doing
this so lazily, same with Venezuela, for a
really long time. So they're already on guard
for it or to it.
And it says that there if you're doing
this still and claiming it's organic, then you're
pushing cheap propaganda.
There are certainly legitimate grievances against the Iranian
authorities, but this wave of unrest is not
about that. It is a foreign backed and
calculated plot to weaken the government.
As noted by Iranian analysts, most of the
riots have occurred in locations throughout Iran that
are in close proximity
to known missile launch sites that just so
happen to have also been directly attacked during
the twelve day war with Israel last year.
No coincidence there, right, that there just happened
to be occurring around all these locations that
were strategically important to what Israel bombed before.
He also says it's also possible that the
unrest
around these locations is designed to distract Iranian
security forces
in those particular areas, allowing professional Israeli employed
operatives to prepare for a new round of
aggression against the country, which we'll get to
in a second. It seems to be what
they're pushing right now. An important observation, he
writes, about these rioters is that many of
them have appeared wearing chains and other expensive
clothing items.
Indicative
of criminal, groups, he writes, unlike local residents,
by the way, who are typically unable to
afford such apparel.
These this suggests that gangs with ties to
Israel or or their foreign intelligence agencies may
be instigating the bulk of the violence.
But re ask yourself why they most many
of them you know, most of the average
people aren't able to afford that stuff. It's
Not because of Iran, guys. It's because of
US sanctions and attacks on their finances
to to a large degree.
But thinking about that, it's an interesting point
to make. Well, this, you know, our partisan
dynamic is always so quick to call out
the smallest thing, and rightly so, about things
like this, but then fail to consider these
kind of dynamics.
He's under broader implications. Now this is the
big picture thing that I think he just
did a really good job breaking down. He
says, if the Israeli US alliance succeeds in
in what they're doing with every one of
these countries, not just Iran and Venezuela, but
this is what he's particularly focusing on,
in its goal of collapsing the Iranian state,
this would result in total domination of the
West of West Asia and prove pivotal to
the ambitions of, throughout their in their ambitions
throughout Africa.
Meaning, obviously, he Venezuela is a part of
the agenda against Iran and plenty of other
things. But if they were if they're able
to accept successfully take that state down,
it would change a lot.
That's why it's always been a focal point
for them for thirty years.
Russia and China have for some time been
portrayed as representing a resurgence of a Soviet
Union style bloc opposed to The United States,
or in other words, the emergence of a
multipolar world.
Following The US operation against Venezuela and the
fall of the Syrian president Bashar al Assad,
it's become clear, and this is not gonna
make some people happy, that no such multipolar
order exists at present.
Now there's many ways to think about that.
It could be that they're not able to
because of what's I've tend to argue that
I don't think any of them truly have
the intentions of making themselves
somehow bound by other people's interests or somehow
less powerful by I just don't I personally
find it hard to believe.
The opening possibility of some better dynamic, we
should always be open to. But, of course,
what's interesting is you have an argument about
a multipolar dynamic, when, again, I don't believe
that's really what they're fighting for. I think
COVID nineteen gave us insights to the larger,
deeper coordination to a lot of these groups.
But think about that being the argument.
And the people in this country, like Alex
Jones and all the rest, who have always
been calling out globalism and now pretend like
they don't know what the word means, or
rather they misrepresent what it does mean, are
calling them globalists.
Well, they're the ones going, no. No. Let's
make this multipolar. But over here, you've got
the exact exactly
what that would look like being called something
else
rolled out by our governments, being spearheaded by
the most
alarming,
elitist technocrats in the world who are also
Zionists.
Right? I mean, think about how weird that
is. What I'm trying to highlight so often
at this point is that this is happening.
Now, look, the word globalism, for example, is
such a buzzword.
I've pointed to things like this my entire
career. Or the term New World Order, for
example, we use the title.
Different than saying the New World Order versus
a New World Order, which is a common
use of the term. But think about it.
These are things that have been discussed. We've
talked about it many times. But it wasn't
a major focus because there were, you know,
there right now, I think for the first
time,
it's
for most people, it's very obvious that you
can see what we would call the globalist
agenda.
It's always been there, but it's become very
clear. But my point is that people then,
today would argue that the term, we talk
about it, put it in the title, it's
like, oh, they're just getting down they're caught
in that that narrative, that rabbit hole. But
it's if you know our work, it's just
not like we're just trying to tap into
some term. We've We've always been talking about
this. The reason I'm focusing on it today
is because it is actually finally developing up
in front of you to a degree that
we can all see. And as always, pointing
out the people who feigned
fighting that are now the ones pulling punches
everywhere.
That's, I argue, by design. This is about
trying to guide you into the ground when
it matters the most. That's what I personally
believe. But I'm saying all that because what's
interesting is that we shouldn't shy away, like
I said before, whether Zionism or whatever it
is, from the obvious.
If you have a state, a government, an
individual who is claiming that they want to
force their agenda, their worldview, their anything,
all over everybody else, there's no better example
of that than The US agenda anywhere in
the world. Anywhere.
Think about that for a second and recognize
what the globalist actually is or what globalism
the order they're building. And it is alarming
and it is being framed under fighting the
very thing they claim they're trying to stop.
Going forward, it says this this became shockingly
clear, the idea of their
you know, that well, again, back to the
point that there is also, on top of
my point, not a multipolar world order
in being built alongside of it or in
in,
you know,
to contest it,
which I argue is probably because there really
isn't it's it's more of another feigned effort
to you know, I hope I'm wrong, quite
frankly, not because I believe in the world
they're trying to build, but just because I
don't believe that it should be a centralized
power in any context.
But we should question that too. But he's
arguing that that's not what's happening. They say
this, but then they don't actually back it
up, which should be very concerning. So even
if you believe in everything they claim in
the multipolar dynamic, recognize they're not even doing
that in earnest. As he says, this became
shockingly clear when the passage of the United
Nations Security Council Resolution two eight zero three
in November,
which authorized the Trump administration's plan to conquer
the Gaza Strip and achieve regime change there.
Of course, a technocratic agenda,
which is literally what they call it, which
we'll get into the idea
of Del C Rodriguez being called the technocratic
leader or the technocratic world. I mean, they're
talking about this right now with Venezuela.
I mean, it's crazy that it could be
so transparent. They're even using the terms, but
then we talk about it, and so much
of the conversation reflects it or,
deflects it or either just ignores it like
some kind of a conspiratorial conversation. It's like
this bitter I think they're already trying to
normalize the term itself. It's just very, very
clear. But he says the passing of the,
security council rather resolution two eight zero three
marked the day when the old international order
effectively died. I'm sure others have their, you
know, feelings on where that might be, but
it's a very good point to think about
the way that they handle it. It's making
it clear that no meaningful opposition to The
US led world order actually exists on the
global stage. That is globalism. That is The
US world order that's being built out with
the support of the groups we're talking about.
That doesn't mean they're the only one trying
to do that, but this is an example
of that. She he writes, this does not
mean that Beijing and Moscow are weak, but
rather that they are clearly unready,
seems like a gen gen a generous word,
I would argue, to assume that major role
many analysts have previously suggested.
Meanwhile, he writes, The US is transforming itself
in order to carve out a new world
order.
This is being achieved by transferring power to
major corporations,
billionaires,
tech companies,
while the government itself focuses on security matters
and coordinates a campaign of global control and
coercion.
The US military is therefore being transformed into
the armed wing of major corporations
as the concept of national sovereignty and international
law collapses.
Think about that. I mean, again, that's what
they're telling you they're doing. They just don't
say it that way in regard to the
outcome.
But what we're seeing is this public private
partnership, which is what we are fighting with
the World Economic Forum, become just like the
marching order of this administration.
We're seeing them selling these things. We're seeing
him with, you know, socialistic, fascistic overlaps, basically
blending corporations with the government. I mean, everything
you guys were saying you were fighting is
playing out in front of you right now.
That's why many conservatives are just not buying
it anymore. That's important. A campaign of global
control and coercion.
Right? Transferring power over to corporations or billionaires
or tech elites or companies themselves.
Consequently, the US government will not be not
be the entity investing heavily in foreign projects.
Instead,
Washington leverages its military might
and intelligence agencies to able enable corporations to
invest in different projects and direct policy on
the ground. And that's why that way, they're
not accountable at all. You got corporate think
think Prospera and these different groups on top
of that. So So it's a different you
have multiple ways it's happening.
One is just seemingly seizing land. But overall,
that's not for the government to be involved
in. Right? That's the idea. While military might
is what drives it in, like the regime
change in Honduras that drove that into reality
back in 2009.
Another one with the electoral,
election manipulation just recently.
I mean, that's exactly what's happening.
It is well understood, he writes, that the
government itself is buried in debt and, therefore,
multinational corporations are now leading the way.
This was a concept first born in of
the World Economic Forum
and the leader, Klaus Schwab, and has since
been altered to suit changing global dynamics.
But realize, Republicans, if you support what they're
doing, you support the World Economic Forum, you
support Davos, you support the Great Reset.
You need to reconcile that because that's where
this comes down to. Ultimately, he writes, even
if the US government is to weaken, the
corporations will keep their wealth
and will be able to control policy. Now
this is interesting because what you what I
think this is,
outlining
is that we're at a point now where
they recognize even the idea of government, hopefully,
fingers crossed, is beginning to be undermined. The
people understand why it shouldn't be what we
want. Or but if you wanna take it
to something that's not just my mindset, that
the people just aren't buying that there's
don't trust the government. Don't trust the the
two party illusion. Right? We're seeing these things
break down. So, hypothetically, if they think that
might amount to them losing power in some
way, well, this is an effort to sort
of shrug that power off onto corporations that
aren't aren't bound by your vote, even if
you believe that's what actually happens, or bound
by your influence, to make it more accurate.
That way, Trump can go, someone else can
come in, the government can completely collapse, but
they maintain their power. They just shift into
the corporate dynamic.
Now it's not as simple as that, but
I believe that's part of what this is
right now, and he made a really good
point with that. All that all that this
new strategy is doing is transitioning from corporations
working through middlemen,
as it has been forever, to control the
direction of US policy, to the corporations
directly leading on their own and receiving the
support from Washington they need to do so.
Now you could make the same point with,
lobbying groups. Right? But the point is that
they've basically sold out to the people who
wanna pay the highest. And in this case,
we also have a very clear overlapping technocratic
agenda. They have the AI agenda. So at
the end of the day, we've gone from
having the Peter Teals behind the scenes quietly
dictating policy to them standing out front, or
rather Musk or the rest.
It's what it's what this is.
In other words, the exact opposite system is
merging in The United States and across the
West, for that matter, as these are multinational
corporations in many cases,
from the from the one that rules from
Beijing.
Well, in other words, the exact opposite system
is emerging in The United States is opposite
from the one in Beijing. He says that
China in China and this is interesting because
people so often try to claim it's one
thing, but if you look at the reality
of it, it is a capitalist system. And
he says, in China, a capitalist system is
controlled by a strong central government that cannot
be lobbied or removed.
In The United States, the capitalists have consolidated
power and created structures that control
of control that will not change, while the
government beneath them is managed by them and
allowed to undergo adjustments that they permit.
He says, while China's a country,
The US's leadership is now composed of multinational,
corporations whose power transcends borders and who will
never be held to account for their actions.
Is that not globalism?
Is that not a technocratic global elite? And
he says the Chinese people can easily identify
easily identify their leaders. Most people in the
West cannot. Now that's not to say, I'm
sure and we've talked he and I have
even talked about this, that that China is
not taking a similar path. But at the
very least, what he's, I think, trying to
highlight the most is that we're at a
place, whether it feels different or is expressed
or defined differently, that we're way further down
that path than even China.
Whereas China in the technocratic sense in regard
to technocratic surveillance is way further ahead, at
least as it would appear. We're catching up
quite quickly. But either way,
the point comes down to the fact that
they're creating a new style of governance, a
transition to some kind of corporate public private
partnership, CEO run country, network states, freedom city,
smart city dynamic.
And I think it's never been more clear
than right now.
So I think this all very much relates
as he does. I'll include this article as
well.
As well as this one that is kind
of the larger point, the network state coup.
And think about that point. Right? How that
very clearly overlaps with what he was just
discussing. It's just one element of how they're
trying to transition into that very phase of
existence.
Now, on top of that, we have the
Iran overlap before we get into some other
points about
military spending.
And this is going around right now. And
this is what's crazy. I mean, just start
with this in general. Well, I mean, right
now, as he are as he highlighted in
that article,
they don't have popular support for this. It's
absolutely embarrassing how little support they're getting for
this more than ever. Same thing in Venezuela.
That's why they have to lie about all
this. But here he is. This is yesterday
yeah. Yesterday.
Reza Pahlavi, the son of the former dictator,
Shah, but, as they joke but, apparently, he's
the crown prince of democracy.
I mean, they actually say it's gonna he's
gonna bring back democracy, but he's a prince
and he's supposed to be the leader because
his father was the ruler. But that's democracy.
Right? Just shut up and follow along.
I've trained all my life, he says, to
serve my nation. I am more than ready
to step into Iran. I will be there
for my compatriots to lead the ultimate battle
on Fox News, given the time, just lay
this out. Nobody supports this, but they'll still
try to force it in, and they may
even still win, which is terrifying.
That's where we are. Now, right now, six
minutes ago from when I started anyway, Iran
experiencing nationwide Internet blackout.
It's every single time, and then they just
say, oh, they can't manage their infrastructure, like
that somehow just perfectly coordinates. No. They're attacking
them. We already talked about this. They've already
discussed it. They've already gloated about how they
do this. They even promoted these things in
the past about their cyber attacks. They're attacking
it for many reasons, my opinion. One, because
they don't want people expressing that they're not
buying this, but they also don't want anybody.
They don't they want this narrative to take
hold. They don't want there to be outside
influence. It kinda goes both ways. At the
end of the day, this is an attack.
Just more acts of war. On top of
that, Trump says The US will strike very
hard again if Iran kills protesters.
You know, the fact that they do that,
they do it more than once over a
couple of days, like, that's a very clear
narrative,
or rather a message.
Go ahead. We'll blame Iran.
It's what it feels like. It's what they
do every time. On top of that, it's
what they've lied about almost every single time.
And right now, and also the point that
everyone seems to be making, and here we
are, ICE shooting people in the streets, but
that's okay. But we can, you know I
mean, it's so obvious that this is a
contradictory
stance. And on top of that, that if
they'll have any excuse, they will use it
to go after them. And that's the worry
right now. Iran protests enter ninth day as
Trump renews intervention threat. Well, that doesn't appear
to be the real picture of the protest.
Here's at least and you'll find many of
these, and, of course, they could be lying.
Right? You could check it. It does appear
to be accurate update, like, race and information
in regard to the imagery.
He says these are the most current pictures
from today from Iran. This is from today.
Pahlavi riot called failed tonight in Tehran.
Do not believe the BS of the Pahlavi
last dog. That that's the Shah's son. They're
claiming their riots and were overtaking a remember
the last one they just did that fell
flat? There wasn't real bit a lot of
momentum?
They claimed they were invading Tehran. All the
Israeli pro bots online were screaming how they
were taking over Iran. The capital's fallen. So,
a, a,
Kamini has fled the capital. All of those
were lies. Lies in hopes of tipping the
scales in their favor. Didn't work.
Here's of course of course, Patrick Bet propaganda
comes on to let the Shah spill all
of his nonsense. That's what that's what they
do. And Ryan Raspiani comes on and says,
I wanna remind Iranians of what Reza Pahlavi
said about returning to Iran in 2023.
Quote, my life is here in America. My
children and everybody I know are here. If
I went back to Iran, what would I
go back to?
Iranians don't want a work from home leader.
The reality, guys, is that he's not an
Iranian leader. He is a US puppet who
happens to be Iranian. If you even wanna
call it that with the regard with the
reality of what his whole background is. But
the the truth is that this person is
not supporting Iran, and you can prove it
to yourself. Now, on top of all that,
the war agenda, you know, of the peace
president has completely continued to increase in every
possible way that should insult you if you
bought his original narrative. Here's the White House
post from yesterday, and he's just quoting his
own statement. I have determined that for the
good of the country, especially in these very
troubled time dangerous times. Of course, that's maybe
why they've just created more chaos to justify
what they thought you would not want because
he promised the opposite. Well, our military budget
for 2027
should not be 1,000,000,000,000. It should be 1,500,000,000,000.0.
My god.
Just a casual fa half trillion
dollars because, you know, some protests.
That was always gonna happen. That money is
going to Israel and all the rest of
the agendas. That's, by the way, not even
secret. Trump has been muscling to get more
money to Israel. Even in the memorandum of
understanding that was already at $40,000,000,000
over ten years, they're pushing it. And that,
by the way, every time it's gone up
has been because of Trump for the most
part. Look it up.
Now we're increasing the money. Right? More money
for the military, but we were gonna lower
cost, we were gonna stop military ventures, and
we were national first, America first. No. Those
were all complete lies. And if you somehow
just pretend that this then this is what
leads to that, then you're a child. Or
you're just out there trying to convince other
people,
gaslighting people to to go along with the
narrative. Because that's not the reality. This does
not lead to that. It never has.
Here's Arnabotran.
I typically oh, you know what?
Okay. Yeah. I'll be right
there. He says, I typically don't like to
be alarmist, but any student of history will
tell you. All the lights are blink are
blinking scarlet red. Hold on. Wait. Let me
make sure I didn't.
One second
just to make sure I didn't miss something
here
right right right okay
So, Arnaud,
in regard to this post,
said this I've I always appreciate his for
as, you know, geostrategic
analysis. He says, I I typically don't like
to be alarmist, but any student of history
will tell you. All the lights are blinking
scarlet red. He says, I mean, massive military
expansion? Check.
Annexation threats? All over the place? Check. And
and not even in, like, some context of
of security or like, it's just, like, we
know they say that, but we're just gonna
seize Greenland. Or, you know, all these claims.
It just or or what they just did
with Venezuela or Mexico, it's illegitimate.
Demonstrated willingness to use military force unilaterally, check.
New imperial doctrine proclaimed, check. With withdraw from
international organizations and international treaties, check. At this
stage, he says, we're not even watching warning
signs anymore. We're watching the thing itself in
motion. That's a great way that's important to
think about. These aren't precursors, guys. They're doing
it.
The only way the world stops this train
is to put differences aside and and and
form a balancing coalition. Now, that doesn't have
to mean global order or some kind of
even multiple it just means that as a
as a collective of people out there with
an interest of recognizing what they're doing, or
anybody else doing it for that matter, The
UK does similar things, Israel,
of simply addressing this and calling it out
publicly. If and then go from there. Otherwise,
he says the dominoes will keep falling one
after another. Hope of self restraint of a
rogue great power isn't historically a very successful
strategy. Self restraint requires either instruction institutions now
being ex exited or norms now being shredded.
Those are in parentheses. The only thing that
can bring it back is fear of consequences.
I happen to agree. Now look, I'm not,
you know, naive enough to think that simply
by calling it out. You know, look, we're
doing that right now. But it is the
idea that we don't do anything because that
won't change it, that's that's black pill. That's
actually giving up. We should stand up and
call this out.
Good morning of Liberty simply says in regard
to a statement about after a long negotiation,
you know, more money for the military. He
simply says, trust me, bro. There's a little
bit money more money for the world's most
expensive military, bro. Take $900,000,000,000
you spend and raise it by 600,000,000,000.
Then I'll shrink the government, bro. We'll start
paying down the debt and end the income
tax and these tariffs after we lose safe,
bro. I promise.
Yeah. Just just what you know, it's a
joke, obviously.
Just keep going along. Keep doing the opposite
of what we claim. One more step, one
more step, and it'll all end up happening.
Hey. And you know what? Even certainly possible,
but highly unlikely, and I think we all
know it's not true. On top of that,
Murray says, well, everybody is arguing about a
few billion dollars of day care fraud, and
I agree with him, which is a problem
that should be fixed and need needs to
be engaged with honestly.
The Trump administration wants to increase our military
spending by almost $600,000,000,000
a year for the same department that's never
passed an audit.
Think about that. The Pentagon, who has never
has continually failed and just shucked off the
responsibility.
And so that billions matters. And by the
way, the 9,000,000,000 is not even accurate to
what they framed it as, but we're okay
with 600,000,000,000
for on a for unaccountable actions. You know,
it's it's it's excellent point, and it shows
you the problem.
Glenn Greenwald says and here's Pete Higgs' death
saying, 1,500,000,000,000,
peace through strength. Just it's just the most
lazy response.
No. It's not peace through strength. It's simply
military funding for the military or merchants of
death and all the people like, you can't
say peace through strength while you're funding a
genocide, you moron. But he says, President Trump
is rebuilding our military larger, stronger, and more
lethal than ever because peace. Right?
And he says, no denying that Alex Karp
Palantir,
Mary Matlison, Bill Ackman, Paul Singer, and tech
tycoons are getting all they wanted for financing
Trump's campaign.
Trump confronting, in quotes, the military industrial complex
in deep state
by doubling the already bloated Pentagon budget.
Silly. It's worthy of ridicule.
Anyone out there acting like that's what they're
doing,
rebels fighting the deep state
needs to be made fun of.
Dave DeCamp just simply points out on top
of that, you know, the ongoing Somalia war
that no one you know, after the claims
and Israel and Swaliland,
well, the US war in Somalia goes on
with no media coverage except from andywar.com.
They've launched another helicopter raid.
It's it's
just endless.
Endless, endless, endless, and there's no justification other
than foreign policy, adventurism for seizing of assets,
for control for Israel.
The lie and, I mean, if you wanna
go off and talk about the Al Shabaab
overlap, recognize the connections to the larger
terror, you know, terrorist industrial complex that they
have created and how this all connects. I'm
just tired of pretending like we have to
debate how obviously they fund terrorism everywhere. It's
not even a debatable conversation. It's one of
the most provable things out there. But people
still push back. And the larger influential people
just keep keep pretend it's not there.
So as to get into Venezuela more deeply,
Orwell points out Trump's hypocrisy. In regard to
this statement here about more money, more spending
for the military, she says, Hong Kong, clown
world. Right? Don, your words have never meant
anything. Now, not now, or ever. I agree.
Where were we here?
Maybe I didn't grab that. Hold on.
And, you know, it's it's actually pretty incredible
how many of these you could find.
On almost every topic, that's the wild part.
You could find them directly contradicting what they
claim is the most important thing ever or
what they've always believed, and it just doesn't
seem to affect the conversation.
This is why, myself included, a lot of
us are going through sort of a confounding,
you know,
not that it should ever be suggested that
what we're doing is unimportant. I always think
this is valuable whether or not it's having
a larger effect on the ultimate outcome in
the sense of, like, the it's just not
really allow they'll they'll still do it anyway.
The point though is that we have to
really con reflect on
other pathways.
Right? Or ways that, like so if
we're just out here spinning our wheels, and
they've recognized a situation or cultivated a situation
where that's okay. Right? Many of us, you
know, you get your moments of awareness and
they shove you into the corner and then
just gets you know, new things get built
and it just they just are okay, letting
you stagnate the background. Right?
If that's the case,
how do we circumvent that? Right? And this
is a conversation we need to have. There's
plenty of ideas.
Here's the clip
of Trump contradicting himself.
Where was that? Damn it. There we go.
Going to run the country until such time
as we can do a safe, proper, and
judicious
transition.
Our current strategy of nation building and regime
change is a proven
absolute
failure. We will break
the cycle of regime change. We must
abandon the failed policy
of nation building
and regime
change
that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, in Libya,
in Egypt,
and in Syria.
Regime chain But the question should be asked,
did he mean it when he said that?
Right? Was that his real policy and then
and then he just decided to change that
for some reason, or was he lying to
you then? Because there's only really one of
two choices here.
Takes chaos.
You've seen how that works
over the last twenty years. That hasn't been
too good. Not a reckless interventionist
globalism.
Well, look at that.
Literally just called it globalism, which now he's
doing. You're listening, Alex Jones? Make some notes.
We're getting out of the nation building business.
We're
going to stay until such time as the
pop proper transition
can take place.
Pretty clear.
So I've I'll include the the last two
shows we discussed this Trump admin illegally attacks
Venezuela, arrest Maduro, while further pushing regime change
in Iran,
as well as the recent one, Venezuela fire
sale. Was there a deal made with Maduro
and is Delce Rodriguez playing Trump? And I
this is something I'm still very much considering,
that there's more multiple layers to what this
is.
So starting with this, exclusive in post Madur
in post Maduro Venezuela,
USI security chief as potential target. I mean,
it just shows you so obviously that this
is not about anything other than absolute control
as long as it as long forever, basically.
And then ultimately now, that's why they're we'll
get into them for selling or only using
the money that we like, basically, through your
system that we use through the old only
US goods and, you know, forcing them to
only do certain things or support certain actions.
But, yeah, but democracy. But Venezuelan people, you
know, it's it's it's on its face transparent.
And so here, we talked about the two
people in the military, both the more the
civilian side of the security forces and then
the military side. And those two people, arguably
still being completely in control of what's going
on in Venezuela.
That that was it. And this or the
argument being that Delsey,
Rodriguez
was tapped because a CIA memo told them
that she would be the one that would
maintain
control. And that anybody else, including the people
they support, including the one they told you
was the actually elected leader,
that wouldn't work because they don't have support.
So think on the beginning of the point
how ridiculous that is. They're the ones talking
about democracy
and the legitimacy of elections, and we have
to make sure that it's, you know, the
real people, what they you know, democracy. Okay.
And then they go, this guy really won,
and we can prove it. Okay. They're lying,
but okay. We'll go with that. Then they
take Maduro out of the way. And then
they go, well, we'll stick with her because,
you know, the other guy won't okay. Well,
so right there. Wouldn't it be we just
did something illegal, we militarily acted?
And the with a point where we'd have
pushed the person in place that you space
supposed to be in place and to change
the way and I'm not justifying or calling
for that. But how much absurdly opposite it
is to go in there and then allow
people that you claim are part of a
terrorist organization to keep running it because that's
best for your interest corporate wise? That's what
they're doing.
The industry of oil and everything else, that's
the rationalization, at least on the surface, that
we wanna maintain some semblance of of of,
what's the word I'm looking for? There's not
chaos.
And so,
logically, that even makes sense. But it really
shows you that it has nothing to do
with anything they claim they're calling for. They
don't it's not about democracy. It's not about
the people's will. They just wanna state those
things and go in and do what makes
them money, what allows them control. And that's
why it's very much worth asking whether Delsey
might have made an agreement or even more
so whether she might have done what she
had to to not be removed. And now
she's playing Trump with these two people at
her on at the wings. So that's why
now, on top of what I just said,
now they're coming out and going, you better
be careful, you guy. We might come take
you too.
It's insane, guys. And this is a person
who is arguably elected, who is part of
the previous administration, and on top of that,
who is allowed to be there now post
what just happened. Right? So they they take
Maduro and they go, okay. Now let's get
this moving. She's in charge. Okay. And then
come back and go, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.
We don't like what you just said. Hold
on. You that's not the right policy. Right.
But democracy,
it's worthy of ridicule, guys, and it just
shows you what they really are. And this
is only about profiteering and control.
And just to be clear, I'm in no
way suggesting that this person is a good
guy or I you know, who knows? At
the end of the day, these people in
government are always pretty shady in my opinion.
The Trump administration has put Venezuela hard line
interior minister on notice that he could be
at the top of a list of targets
unless he helps interim president Rodriguez meet US
demands.
Right. In other words, that means Venezuelan interest
of the people, what US demands. And keep
order following on the top, following the toppling
of Maduro according to people familiar with the
matter.
His name is,
Diosdara Cabello, who controls security forces accused of
widespread human rights abuses. So even right there,
who knows if it's accurate? But the point
is, they've accused him of human rights abuses.
But let him stay though because that just
works for everybody's dynamic. So they don't really
care about human rights abuse. They don't really
care about terrorism as they found and work
with those people. You know, common thread here,
guys, is one of a handful of Maduro's
loyalists on top of that. That's okay because
he's Maduro's a terrorist, but that guy, we're
gonna keep because he works for our interests.
That Donald Trump has decided to rely on
on temporary as temporary rulers to maintain stability
during transition periods,
said one sort of, briefed on their thinking.
US officials are especially concerned that Cabello, given
his record of oppression and a history of
rivalry with Rodriguez, could play the spoiler and
are seeking to force his cooperation even as
they look for ways to eventually push him
out of power into exile.
Think about wild that is, said the source,
speaking on if condition of anonymity, so who
knows? But the idea doesn't seem to it
seems to line up with what they do.
So they might just decide to push him
out later. How long does that go on?
A year?
Ten
years? Forever is the point, guys, because they
do it everywhere whenever they want. So we
don't like what he's doing today, so we'll
kick him out of the way. But right
now, they're continuing to act like it's an
extension of the operation. Realize this is what
they do everywhere, all the time to anybody
they don't like. They just do it at
least they used to do it quietly.
In the meantime, it says they have communicated
to Cabello via intermediaries that if he is
defiant,
defiant to US interests, obviously,
he could face a similar fate to Maduro,
which we don't we don't even know what
that ultimately is just yet. The authoritarian leader
captured a US raid on Saturday and wished
to wait in New York to face prosecution,
because that's not ridiculous at all, or could
see his life in danger,
said the source. Right. So we're threatening death
as well. But talking to Cabello could be
risky, possibly motivating pro government motorcycle groups known
as collectivos
to take to the streets, unleashing the chaos
Washington wants to avoid.
Their reaction may depend on whether they feel
protected by the officials. Okay. So let's just
say they maintain secure, semblance of normalcy
so they can export oil and make lots
of money.
Doesn't that then very clearly mean that the
collectivos and the terrorist administration, as they claim
it, is still completely in charge or at
least in power?
Yes. As always, they don't care if terrorists
are in charge. And again, that's not what
I'm calling them, just their perspective.
They'll work with the ISIS and Al Qaeda
groups. They'll work they'll fund the people that
they claim they're fighting everywhere it's way, Hamas
or anybody else, because that's what they do.
It's actually their model, guys.
Oh,
wait. It says,
alright. Okay. Continuing. Rodriguez later announced the appointment
of Calixto,
Calixto
Ortega, former president of a central bank, as
vice president of economy.
So
plenty of things we've already discussed on top
of things like that and what they do
going forward, the amenable actions. She's already very
she's already showing very clear,
I guess, willingness to allow them to come
in and exploit the country. But I'm still
hope waiting to see how this plays out,
but right now, I'm not feeling hopeful about
it. And you can even argue that's just
because she just doesn't wanna be murdered, which
is certainly something to consider. But I'm questioning,
and I want your thoughts, whether you feel
that she is double crossing all you know,
maybe
screwed over Maduro. Or maybe the original agreement
that they
Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal reported
on that Maduro was in fact behind the
scenes discussing some sort of transition out of
into exile,
that maybe that he was double crossed and
that's why he's still in prison. Or maybe
they made the whole thing up. You know?
This is where we have to really be,
guys, because this is what happens every time.
Cultivating these narratives, we have to wait for
the evidence.
It says, also on the list of potentials,
of course, is the defense minister. So, basically,
as I said, and we called this out
in the beginning, the two people who seem
to be actually in charge of
everything are the one they now focus on.
That is another point to maybe makes the
suggestion that she's pulling away from them. And
they recognize it's because those two people are
actually in control. But it says it's under
US drug trafficking indictments and has multimillion dollar
bounty on his head. But we'll let him
rule for now because democracy.
This remains a law enforcement operation, and we
are not done yet, said the United States
Department of Justice.
Okay? So where's the conclusion? What's the end
goal?
They'll never get into it because it's in
this is what they are everywhere all the
time. It's an ongoing operation
to every country, every leadership, every point. It's
not whenever they go afoul of what we
want, legal stuff, democracy.
A senior Trump administration official declined to answer
Reuters specific questions but said a in a
statement, quote, the president is speaking about exerting
maximum leverage with the remaining elements in Venezuela
and ensuring they cooperate with The United States
by halting illegal migration,
stopping drug flows, revitalizing oil infrastructure, and doing
what's right for Venezuelan people.
So the the immigration part is not even
being the the idea that we pretend that
anything other than their sanctions and their attacks
have driven people in The United States, which
you can quite literally prove on top of
the manipulation of that by other powers we've
discussed.
If the argument that that somehow is a
decision that, like, but like they said, that
Biden was allowed it's just a joke, guys.
Everything they're doing is so transparent right now.
So by saying halting immigration,
well, that, that stops the moment you stop
sanctioning and destroying the country, which is what
they're already starting to do to some degree.
So there you go. Self fulfilling prophecy, stopping
drug flows. It barely exists in the first
place if you wanna look at international dynamic.
It's easy to prove. Revitalizing oil infrastructure, that's
really the point of this net right now
is letting us come in and exploit and
steal and and ex you know, destroy the
country even further. And what's right for the
Venezuelan people, any of the things they're doing
are the opposite. So, really, they're just saying,
let us come in and take what we
want, and I'm waiting to see what she
does. The administration has decided Venezuela's opposition led
by Maria,
Machado,
would be unable to keep the peace at
a time when Trump wants enough calm on
the ground to jump start access for oil
companies. See? Pretty clear what's happening. And so
it doesn't matter that we claim they were
elected and that the people wanted them. But
we're gonna say not those people because we
want something.
How much more clear can this get? It's
it's sort of like when we get into
the point in a second about claiming Maduro
worked for the cartel of the what was
it? The of the Suns or whatever. And
he's a trafficker. And then, oh, no. We
quietly just we admit that never really happened.
But we're past it now. Move on.
They know, guys. And they know we know.
That at this point, it's a it's a
mirage, and it's whether we choose to push
back.
He says,
continuing
to access to the vast oil reserves and,
to avoid having to put US forces on
the ground. Too late. It's already happening. Trump
instead has embraced a classified CIA assessment that
concluded Maduro's top aids would be best suited
to run the country, on inter base, of
course. Which that means they can come in
and change whenever they want. So if they
let them be in power for the next
twenty years, they can always argue, well, we
only said it was an inter basis. But
the inter administration wants to eventually see a
move towards new elections,
though the time frame remains unclear.
Yeah. That's that's setting lightly seeing as how
they basically insinuated it could go on forever.
Trump has offered no clear explanation of how
Washington would oversee Venezuela after the biggest US
intervention in Latin America since nineteen eighty nine
invasion of Panama. Critics have condemned it as
a neo as neocolonial
colonialism and violation of international law. I mean,
this is what I always say it's fine
so funny.
From a platform like ro Reuters,
well, you guys have minds.
You have people who can read books.
Is it or is it not a violation
of international law?
Critics condemn it as new. Well, it is
that. It's quite literally by the definition of
the words that but, you know,
I've just how I would see it. The
US wants to see progress towards meeting US
objectives in a matter of weeks,
sources said. Do what we want right now
because freedom and democracy. Beyond threats of further
military action, The US could use Rodriguez' finances
as leverage
because that's legitimate.
That she's they're talking about using her financial
situation and claiming that she's basically saying that
she's illegally doing something through Qatar. Qatar denies
that. But let's not let's realize what that
overlaps with. Israel. That's not even sacred. And
so interestingly enough, that could be more than
it seems, but I'm waiting to see how
that plays out. US authorities and their intermediaries
are also seeking a co opt to co
opt other Venezuelan officials.
And he and he and, those at levels
below them to open the way for government
that will acquiesce to Washington interests. It's very
transparent.
Quiet part out loud. But what that tells
me, if that's accurate, if they're right now
trying to coop other people, they're not in
control. And I do think that's the case
whether or not Delsea has sold somebody out
or working with them. It's pretty clear based
on everything we've seen if, you know, with
not knowing that some of it could be
inaccurate, that those two people were clearly still
in charge. And maybe they felt Delsey was
on their side. Maybe they didn't care. It's
hard to say at this point. But with
the fact that they're trying to get more,
that shows me that they're trying to vie
for more position.
Trump's advisers, see Rodriguez as a linchpin, a
technocrat.
That's what they wrote. A technocrat who
they believe is amenable to working with The
US on a transition and oil related issues
according to people briefed by The US about
US strategy. So US officials, people behind them
are talking about this, calling her a technocrat.
That's not even the only example, guys.
Now look. The word is used. The word
has a definition.
It doesn't only mean the worrisome thing that
we see it as. I I mean, technically,
it does, but the point I'm not misrepresenting
the term. But you could argue it just
means a a technical, you know, a scientific
technological
expert in their field. You know, it can
be used in that kind of broad sense.
Or rather, I guess, more specific sense, the
broad sense being sort of what we're discussing.
But
I find it fascinating. The world is very
aware of this conversation.
Trump has talked about this point. So when
they make that term used for that or
use it to talk about the new Gaza
freedom city,
it's just I think it's on purpose.
So on top of that, Orwell shared this
with me. This is a video.
Maduro Maduro was gone. Now what in Venezuela?
This is from the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, which we've talked about many times
over the years, the CSIS.
This is
doctor Ryan Berg, director of the America's program
and head of the future of Venezuela initiative
at the CSIS.
Just a quick point. Here's what he says
about where was it again?
Here we go. A more technocratic beep about,
Rodriguez.
So that is, February.
Let's check this out.
Continuation
of
A fact of vice president
becoming president is someone
with whom we can work and someone who
is, more pragmatic,
less ideological,
more technocratic,
someone we can work with.
So interesting. Right? I mean,
what do you think they're even trying to
use that term for?
Well, I mean, in this context, like, it
sounds like they're just trying to create the,
you know, in a general, whether it's intentional
here or not, into just like a technical
expert. But there is a part of that
that means that, but it's it doesn't even
seem to apply here. Why would she be
more technocratic
other than willing to align herself with that
agenda, willing to allow a technocratic transition? I
mean, because if you look at the reality
of her background and look at what she's
doing, I don't see an example of what
that word means other than the larger point.
I I mean, I get the sense that's
being used to make this case.
Like, to normalize the idea, to make it
about a good here's the good technocratic
groups now taking control for democracy. I don't
know. I just think it's very relevant that
these terms are now being used to define
the person they want to be in power
in yet another regime change while techno technocracy
seems to be overtaking everything.
Personally, I find that very relevant. Listen one
more time.
It is, the
de facto, not the de jure president that
we recognize as legitimate, but the de facto
vice president
becoming president is someone
with whom we can work and someone who
is, more pragmatic,
less ideological,
more technocratic.
And again, that's the point he just made.
That's the logic there. That, yeah, yeah, we
know that we've been screaming about that person
being the legitimate president. I know we told
you that they robbed them and that we
they stole it from them and that should
be in power. But, you know, this one
makes better sense for us right now. This
one works better for our agenda. And it
is
I mean, that's that we used to be
why don't people laugh about that?
I'd be like, well, then you're ridiculous. Then
you're a hypocrite. Right? Didn't you just get
done telling us that now it doesn't matter
because your interests?
Yes, guys. Yes. It's never been more clear.
It's always in front of you.
So thank you, Orwell, for sharing that.
Continuing,
Evan loves Wharf's.
Wharf points out the
weird change of this conversation.
Reuters posts,
US may subsidize oil companies to rebuild Venezuela's
energy infrastructure. And don't forget, they've already made
it clear that that possibly could come out
of your tax dollars.
This is how ridiculous it is. It's a
bit like, so it starts. It's about gangs.
Right? Oh, wait. Wait. It's about fentanyl, actually.
No. No. It's cocaine. Sorry. We meant cocaine.
Actually, they stole our oil.
No. You're gonna pay for the oil.
Wow. Quite a swing in that conversation.
It's embarrassing. Well, on top of that, the
drug overlap, we saw Alex Witkoff. Right? We
made that point where he very clumsily tried
to make the argument that somehow because somebody
he was I I figured it was. He's
he's somebody he related to died of an
OxyContin overdose that therefore Maduro,
Venezuela.
Yeah. He missed the boat on that one,
guys. That it's just a lazy and if
I think even the oh, he they blocked
him, so he probably can't post it now.
What we showed on the show last I
think it was the last show. Oh, it's
right here. Here we go. They actually they
even Twitter fact checked him saying, no. No.
That's he died from an oxy to OxyContin
overdose. OxyContin was developed by Purdue Pharma. By
the way, the Sackler family who was basically
given a financial slap on the wrist well,
that's the wrong way to say that. They
were charged a lot of money, but it
was a slap on the wrist because they
made 10 times that in that year alone.
They know that, by the way.
But a lot he came out and made
this big case about how, oh, thank God,
Trump saved us from and then everybody called
him out, and he went on a blocking
spree. Because he's got community noted, and he
was embarrassed. But that's what happens today, guys,
because the whole world's waking up.
Ron Paul. You know, one of the people
they wanted you to think they were gonna
work with. One of the people they wanted
to pretend like, you know, like Massey and
everybody else. No. No. They lied to you
because they know what we actually want. That's
actually a not a good point. It shows
you that most people, conservatives or anybody,
actually want the good thing. Ron Paul says
the case against Nicolas Maduro hinged on the
Trump administration's designation
of Cartel de la Souls
as a terrorist drug organization with Maduro in
charge. Remember? They couldn't stop talking about it.
Bondi and Mo Nome, and they were all
saying the same thing.
Well, if you haven't caught wind of it
already, they've now officially admitted that wasn't real.
And I mean, that's that's exactly the reality.
Not only just because the indictment didn't mention
any of it, but they've actually been forced
to acknowledge that it didn't exist.
How ridiculous is that? The opera and to
me, if you wanna stand back even further,
that's incompetence.
You can't manufacture a lie that doesn't just
fall apart at your feet. That's embarrassing.
The operation looks much like much he says
the operation looks like not much more than
a big payoff to Trump's donors, including vulture
capitalist Paul Singer, who stands to make billions.
So here's what's interesting.
Somebody comes out, myself included, and says, Zionist
Paul Singer stands to wildly benefit from the
they go, oh, you hate Israel. Yo. You're
so racist.
Okay. You can lie about that all you
want. Here is Ron Paul and plenty of
others who simply make the argument. Here's a
guy who stands to benefit wildly. Is he
still racist too?
It matters. The guy's a Zionist. He's actually
publicly discussing that. What's funny is
it's so easy people to dismiss certain things.
As I keep pointing out, it is central
to the argument. And I don't I mean,
Dane McAdams, he'll make these points. It's just
important to see that framing because that is
the reality.
They lied to you. Benjamin Norton simply points
out this data, the route the UN and
and Afghanistan.
The UN office on drugs and crime shows
how under The US military occupation,
under Trump's administration, by the way as well,
and others, Afghanistan became the world's top producer
of opium
used to make heroin.
After The US withdrew from Afghanistan, opium production
suddenly collapsed.
Now there's much more to this story. Oh,
and this is just Seth saying the biggest
cart drug cartel that ever existed was The
US client state in Afghanistan.
Backed by the special forces in the CIA
that produced about 15 metric tons of pure
heroin of twenty two thousand one to 2021.
Note how that spans through Trump and Biden's
administration.
Couldn't be more clear. And we've never heard
one word about where the money went because
Trump cares. Right?
It's just obvious. Now this we I'll include
the article here that I put up back
in 2016,
Operation During Freedom, The United States Opium Trade.
It's very clear, guys. And the truth of
it is obvious.
Like, not just because of images of them
guarding poppy fields, but the reality of what
happened. The Taliban basically near
removing the the the field, which was very,
actually, easy to prove.
Not the the operations. Right? The opium trade.
And then the moment The US occupied, that
trade exploded by 90%.
And so too did the almost exactly with
it, the world trade. Almost identical to it,
the increase of opioid in this country.
It's not a secret, guys. You don't need
to ask me. It's very clear how that
connects.
And then as he points out, the moment
they left, and they didn't really technically leave,
but they stopped their influence over all this.
Well, it completely went down. Look at that.
Guys, I mean, you don't we are being
gaslit by everybody.
It's time to wake up. What do do
you like being a fool? I'd rather play
it as a fool. I certainly do not.
I guarantee the honest people in this country,
left and right, do not like being made
a fool. Stand up and start being honest
about what's happening and stop playing the partisan
game, or we'll never gonna come back from
this.
Camilla points this out in regard to Venezuela.
Now there's a ton that happened, by the
way. The bombing of different locations,
the apparently, a a mausoleum from Chavez. Like,
these are deliberate. This is exactly what Israel
is doing in Gaza while they claim targeted
operations. It's basically the same policy right now.
Confirm. The United States completely destroyed a vital
scientific and academic center in Venezuela.
See how the sale similar this is? How
long till they start bombing hospitals? On Saturday,
January 3 now I'm kinda being facetious because
I don't I hope it's not an ongoing
bombing campaign. I feel like they've got what
they want at the moment. But the reality
being, the way that they frame these things,
the way that they conduct their policy, it
seems like one group, guys.
On Saturday, January 3, facilities at the mathematics
center of the Venezuelan Institute of Scientific Research
were destroyed in The US bombing attack on
Venezuela. Remember when they told you there was
targeted actions to get Maduro out of the
way? They lied to you. And you could
prove that with your eyes. Because You could
look at how they bombed, and it proved
that in and of itself.
These locations were destroyed in The US bombing
attack. The center is part of the National
University of Sciences,
doctor Humberto Fernandez Moron.
The attack has been described as total. These
areas housed servers and essential equipment for computer
networks that were completely devastated.
This was clearly not just what they claimed.
Two missiles directly hit the area, leaving fragments
that show imperial,
imperial hatred against Venezuela's sovereign technological development. In
addition to the completely destroyed mathematics center,
four more research centers of the institute were
affected.
Physics center, chemistry center, eco ecology center, and
the nuclear technology unit. These spaces have been
fundamental in training the professionals who support health
engineering and oil
sovereignty. And the video will break this down.
Brian Grim, in regard to the media coverage.
And just showing you yet again how the
current Trump administration, but in case you missed
the point, so too did everyone before that,
hate you as Americans if you dare call
them out. Because here, we're talking about journalists
or anybody for that matter. You're a journalist
if you decide to be despite the claims
of what they do with corporate media.
Supreme Court has roundly upheld the reality of
that.
You don't need some credential. You don't need
some you just need to choose to cover
things. Okay?
So when you put some information out,
even if it was given to you, leaked
or otherwise,
if that proves a crime like this very
clearly was a crime, then that's not illegal
to put out. You're protected by the whistleblower's
act. And by the way, it shouldn't be
anyway, seeing as how it's information Americans have
right to know.
Rep representative,
Anna Paulina Luna, you know, despite her momentary
pretending to fight against you know, to promote
the Epstein files coming out even though she's
an absolute team player.
My subpoena
to call Seth Harp to testify before congress
for his actions
in doxxing
a Delta Force commander and leaking in in
classified information regarding a Venezuela mission, Operation Absolute
Resolve has passed unanimously with support from both
Democrats and Republicans out of committee. Yep. Because
they all hate you and then none of
them want you to call out their military
adventurism.
Putting a service member on their and their
family in danger, which I don't believe is
what happened here, in dishonorable and feckless.
What's dishonorable and feckless is murdering people for
your imperial agenda. That's what's feckless. Leaking classified
information demands explanation and criminal criminal investigation. Seth
Hart will be held accountable for his actions.
So
trying to hold somebody accountable for breaking information
about your illegal operations
is authoritarian.
Ryan Grim says reporters don't leak classified information.
We publish it. Right? I mean, think about
that. That's a good point. The leak comes
from the people giving it to you. They
publish information
per the rights given to all Americans under
the first amendment.
Why do you hate America? You just have
to realize how very crap like, deliberately they're
trying to reorganize
everything that we are.
It's not just about the larger network state.
It's everything, guys. They are transitioning everything.
Now to make that even more clear, just
a very clumsy effort by Rick's, was it
Rick Scott? Right? Is that his name? Probably
not. What is his name again?
I'm I'm forgetting his name all of a
sudden.
You remember you remember me in the chat
what his name is. All these people are
the same to me, quite frankly. But here
he is from, was it Texas? I forget
now. But he says US senator says Cuba,
Nicaragua, and Colombia will be next. Democracy is
coming back to the hemisphere.
What a clown. Let me play it first.
Proud of what the president did, and Marco
Rubio and Pete Hejseff and everybody,
our military,
Maria Carina Machado, and what they did in
Venezuela is gonna change Latin America. This is
the start of a change in Venezuela.
It is Rick Scott. Right. But okay. The
only confounding point here is that that's not
the person that you guys have put in
charge though. So So keep pretending like that
makes sense. And I don't support any of
them, by the way. I support the people
that Venezuela wants in that place. And we're
gonna fix Cuba. Nicaragua will get fixed. Next
year, we'll get a new president in Colombia.
We're gonna start What about that? The democracy
is coming back to this hemisphere. So the
president I mean, they're they're unabashedly
telling you that we are going to alter
people's
dynamic in countries that we don't like.
They're not even hiding that right now. Rubio,
Miller, I mean, they're coming out hot about
this. That's what superpowers do. No longer are
we gonna chakau away from other people from
the law? He calls it international niceties. That's
what Miller called international law.
These people are monsters, guys. Now look at
what I said. This is what's important to
think about how funny and obvious this is.
Right. Because democracy, which is what they're calling
this, as he just said, democracy's coming back.
Because democracy is obviously it obviously means using
military power to force in the regime most
willing to sell out their own country and
exploit their own people for the benefit of
a small group of billionaires.
Democracy. Right? And then, of course,
America.
We're a joke right now. Rather, they are
making us a joke. Our government who pretends
to represent us.
It's quite alarming with how cavalierly they can
just state what we would otherwise call terrorism
or criminal activity if any other government was
doing it.
Angelo points this out. US demands Venezuela cut
ties with Russia, China, Iran, Cuba. Cuba.
How does this make sense? It's the same
point.
Why would they get to decide what Venezuela
can do? So let's just say they claim
democracy. Okay? Let's just even say it's the
interim group. You telling them what they can
and can't do and who they can work
with and what they can sell to is
simply, as Rubio tries to claim, We're not
controlling the country, we're just convicting policy. Yeah,
but that's controlling the country, which you know.
You're hoping people are too dumb to recognize
that.
I mean, I know you guys have cultivated
some pretty stupid people around you, but most
Americans,
conservatives included, and them liberals included,
see what you're doing.
You demanding they cut ties with foreign countries
is illegitimate. It is illegal occupation. It is
colonialism. It is everything we've talked about because
that is not your choice.
Even with the puppet government you put in
place, if that's what's happening. Now I I
just for a general time, I think I
wanna
I I you can you can read more
of it. The point is simply that they're
demanding that they do what they say. Here,
DDG politics says this is psychotic. Trump is
openly announcing that after the kidnapping of Maduro,
Venezuela will now be forced to spend its
oil revenue exclusively on American products. So you're
taking control of their industry, exploiting that for
your benefit with your companies, and then saying,
whatever we kick down to you, you then
have to turn around and give back to
us through some kind of a sale.
That is grifting or whatever you wanna call
it. I mean, that's completely illegitimate.
That's I don't mean I don't even think
I need to explain it. All you've done
is create a basic, like, a feedback loop,
like an illusion of some kind of functioning
government where you're dictating every outcome and you
benefit from every movement.
Venezuela sell its oil, the money's recycled back
to United States, The US controls the grid,
medicine, agriculture, and energy infrastructure,
Compliance is enforced through sanctions, blockades, and implicit
threats of force,
but otherwise known as democracy. Right?
And here's what Trump says. This is the
White House account. Venezuela is going to be
purchasing only American made products with the money
they receive from their new oil deal.
Isn't that embarrassing? Right. So, yeah, you've got
China who was attempting to make deals.
Whether they're using their power to get a
better position or not, I'm sure they did.
Then Trump comes in and basically kidnaps the
leader, forces people in power they want, and
then says, do you have to do it
this way? And then calls it a deal.
I mean, guys,
that's pathetic.
This guy would make fun of this in
other context. If this was, you know, let's
what is the show? Whatever. If he was
on one of his shows, he would fire
the person framing it that way because that's
bad. His books will tell you, you don't
just call it something. There's he is doing
the criminal thing and just claiming it something
else.
That's not crafty.
I'll I'll even give Trump credit where it's
due. He's way more crafty than that. I've
seen in the past pretty pretty,
deceptively
frame things in a way that actually sound
like it makes sense. So I ask, who's
driving this? Why would he be so blatantly
hypocritical? You I mean, you know what I
think. I just want you to ask those
questions because it does not seem to line
up with what they've done before.
Other than the actions being belligerent,
My point is that even he is more
crafty than that.
James
Suroweke points out one final time, this is
not something the Trump administration is allowed to
do. Lisa,
how do you pronounce that last name, breaking
Trump administration plans to put money that they're
raising from the seizure of that Venezuelan oil
into bank accounts apparently outside
the US Treasury.
Gee, I wonder if that involves a foreign
country. They told lawmakers today, per multiple sources
familiar. Sources said they understood that these are
as similar or decidedly offshore accounts.
Think about how crazy that is. That is
straight up criminal activity being framed as okay
because it's the government, which is pretty much
what they do every day right now. Now,
this is preliminary. Obviously, when it comes out
like this, they don't want it to. They'll
come out and call it a lie, even
though half the time it later happens,
or they might shift direction. But realize this
is what they we've come to expect from
them. And as James says, this is not
something they're even allowed to do, but that
doesn't stop them anywhere else. There is no
provision in the constitution or US law that
permits the president to put any government money
into bank accounts outside the treasury
or to spend money congress has not appropriated.
Think about how crazy see what there how
much you wanna bet this ends up in
the hands of their allies, Israel's bank account,
and Trump's friends and his family.
I'm kinda not even joking about that. This
is so wildly criminal.
And the mafia don't, as Aaron Mate frames
it, the mafia don doctrine. I'm just gonna
read it for you because I can't stand
to listen to Tom Cotton whine right now.
Quiet part out loud. Cotton confirms blockade goal
to harm Venezuelan civilians. He says the lights
are literally going off, are going to go
off, which they just did in Iran, by
the way. Don't miss that. They're not going
to be able to pay policemen or firefighters
or teachers unless they begin to cooperate with
us.
They they they're unabashedly criminals right now. We're
gonna force in, but because we're inherently good
and right and moral, even though that's not
true, whatever we do, even through violence and
criminal activity and straight up murder is still
good because we're a good guy. It's sort
of like when they framed nuclear power and
oil as being green under the Biden administration
because, well, we do it for freedom.
You don't get that that's exactly the same
mindset? That's how they see it, or rather
they lie to you about it.
James Lee.
Just recently, Matt Walsh was against US intervention
in Haiti. Right? Which is clearly in the
Western Hemisphere.
However,
here he is all of a sudden invoking
the Monroe Doctrine to justify intervention because as
James Lee writes, and I prob I agree,
but I don't think we can prove that,
his boss Shapiro told him so.
I mean, this Matt Walsh, I mean, people
like this are just they always act like
they're so I mean, look, that's all personal
opinion. At the end of the day,
he's being a hypocrite. You either have a
principle or you don't. You either stand against
regime change, Tim Pool, or you don't. And
all of you guys right now are showing
yourselves to be feckless, complete hypocrites.
But that's nothing new to me.
Yeah. We've been calling people out for a
long time. On top of that, here's from
today, The US could run Venezuela for years,
says Trump. Of course, because that's what we
expected. I mean, it's not surprising at all.
Only somebody who is naive to and and,
you know, ignorant of their previous actions would
think that that wasn't going to be the
case.
Here we are.
Money exchanged while allowing people that you they've
told you were bad guys to run the
country. That's that's the same as everywhere else.
Now this is embarrassing for her, isn't it?
More so, Tulsi Gabbard, because of this.
US spy chief Gabbard's been excluded from Maduro
plans over the past years.
So not only is she being boxed out
from her team
because she has previous stances that they don't
like,
but she's also sold out recently to maybe
gain back I I she's sold out entirely
over being this benched side somebody who is
a token on their team.
I hope she is upset with herself. I
hope she comes out and calls out herself.
I might even gain back some support for
me if she came out and was like,
you know, straight up was like, I made
a mistake. I should've done this. I thought
I could do good by the end of
it and by, you know, blah blah blah.
I I probably would never support her in
the long run like anybody, any of them.
But at the end of the day, I
would call out why I thought that was,
brave. I mean, I highly doubt that will
ever happen.
But just realize,
the White House has cut director of national
intelligence.
That's where think about why that's crazy. The
director of national intelligence, one of the highest
positions,
cut out
of months of Venezuelan planning due to her
previous
beliefs. Aides are now joking. DNI stood for
do not invite.
Think about that. Think about how upset she
must be right now. And I I think
deservedly so. I hope she's really, really
disappointed in herself.
Here's what she said back in 2019. The
United States needs to stay out of Venezuela.
Let the Venezuelan people determine their future. We
don't want other countries to choose our leaders,
so why?
So we have to stop trying to choose
theirs.
And now she recently came out and was
like, yay, Trump, for what he did. Basically.
I went over it in the last show.
It's just pathetic, guys. I'm I mean, I
have less
I have a lower opinion of someone like
this than I do of somebody who is
bombastically bad about what, you know, openly doing
the wrong thing because at least they own
their actions.
Makes me sad.
Now, one overlapping point to this, we're not
gonna get into this in-depth today, but just
to keep keep this in mind as we
go into the ICE discussion. As Jenny Culverously
pointed out, over the whole network state connection
to Venezuela,
she says, look who's circling Venezuela. This is
back from '20, December 2025.
During his interview with Maria Carina Machado,
Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale tells her, quote, we
have a lot of friends here who've had
to flee Venezuela and who are huge fans
of yours.
And we're very excited to come back and
invest
and build.
And with you with you, and
with you when you get to be a
free country.
Palantir cofounder Lonsdale posted his interview.
This is where I got the clip she
posts. And the the other points we've gone
to. The larger point simply, I think I
included a thread right here of Mark Lutter
and the conversation of funding Venice
a a charter city in Venezuela,
should they get the transition they want, which
I think that's what we're dealing with right
now. It's like every one of these conversations.
Now very well may not be the main
point. Maybe that's a side of byproduct of
the larger geo plus geostrategic agenda,
but this is part of it. And so
what's interesting is that he is involved with
the overlap.
Here's a, you know, kind of overlap of
all of it. What do Venezuela, Greenland, Honduras,
Nigeria, Freedom Cities have in common? The network
state cabal, Andreessen, Lonsdale, Peter Thiel.
Here's a thread.
But here's drop site news. Palantir cofounder Joe
Lonsdale, and this is from
the January
6,
has publicly endorsed a post calling for the
extermination
of commies,
responding exactly
and asking, what do you think founding Palantir
was supposed to be about on Twitter?
Apparently, killing killing leftists.
The comment was posted in response to a
tweet that stated leftist, quote, should be blown
up along with their grave sites.
Language explicitly advocating mass violence for political beliefs.
Lonsdale's remark reinforces long standing criticism of Palantir
as a firm aligned with militarism,
counterinsurgency,
and political repression.
Palantir's software is widely used by The US
and the Israeli military, various intelligence agencies, and
police departments,
Gotham, for example, in The United States, as
well as other foreign security forces. Now
I've always pointed this out. I I'm out
of the mind of these people in, like,
they endorse libertarianism, for example. I don't believe
they're libertarians. So in this case, when he's
going, go after the leftist and they're, you
know, like, they were doing this in the
previous administrations because I think they were trying
to align with the current Trump momentum.
Right? So my point is I think they
would align with pretty much whatever would get
them in the position they're in. But, of
course, that's for you to decide. I could
be wrong. This is simply saying that, you
know,
whatever it is,
he's saying this publicly, driving the idea, and
here we are today with what's happening in
this country as Palantir is being used to
facilitate what effectively is carrying kind of this
kind of action out. Now it's not just
leftists. There's clear that's the narrative in many
ways. But clearly, there's Republicans. There's US veterans
on Republican side. There's all kinds of people
who are being attacked,
arrested,
deported,
many of which are US citizens in those
conversations. And these people are behind that or
driving that through the technology, through the Trump
administration.
I just found that very relevant that he's
expressing a mindset to basically
blow up along with their gravesites, leftists in
general, or exterminate commies who have different ideas.
That's what he's expressing.
So keep that in mind as we go
through and the great Palantir reset or the
Palantir world order conversation about how they used
immigration and their surveillance or other immigration to
justify their surveillance state that they built on
top of everything else. So
what we know, one day after the killing
of Renee Goode. Oh, and I want to
point out early that there I don't think
I grabbed
it. There is a circulation of a white
a white woman with a child going around
that's not her.
Typical partisan nonsense of both sides, by the
way.
So January 8 is today.
Now we're gonna go over some of these
points, then we're gonna go over some, I
think, very important breakdowns of the dishonesty of
the evidence at hand.
Now Noem said the shooting occurred after protesters
in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, by the way. I mean, do we
just not find that incredibly coincidental that they've
been screaming about these very points, these very
locations? And
is it not also very obvious that every
time that happens,
whatever it is, Elon Musk screaming about Haiti.
Right? Them is talking about Minnesota, whatever it
is. Somalia all of a sudden. When they
do that, all of a sudden, the new
the next agenda just happens to align with
that location? The next event that takes place
organically just happens to be in line with
what they were pointing to?
Must just be a continual nonstop coincidence. Right?
Now I'm not even suggesting anything more than
just what that there's you know, I don't
know. That's an opinion.
But I find it near impossible that every
time it could just be to make it
simple that they choose to focus these locations
on organic events while ignoring others because they're
talking about it. But I think we know
it's typically more than that. Noem said the
shooting occurred at the protest in Minneapolis, harnessed
or excuse me, harassed and impeded ICE agents
on Wednesday, and that the officer acted to
protect himself and fellow officers. We'll get into
the illegitimacy of the lies around all of
this. She alleged that Goode's actions amounted to
an act of terrorism.
Now we'll show you the video.
Realize this is a person who is an
American, who is monitoring what they're doing because
what they're doing is constantly being shown to
be illegal. I'm gonna go over the
many times they've already been caught lying about
being run over and opening fire on people.
Four that I can prove to you, by
the way, of literally being caught lying about
what just happened to justify shooting, in some
cases, almost killing somebody.
Think about how crazy that is. Or the
example, you could ask Grock if it makes
you feel better. McLaughlin or Gnome being caught
very, like, literally lying
about what they say is happening. About who
shot where, who was involved, or what they
were carrying, or whether they tried to run,
or what side of the border they were
on. Over and over and over, they keep
getting caught lying in court, and we just
don't take I mean, we'll get into it.
It's just it's just confounding to me. It's
wild how clear it is. Or the lack
of training, the people they're hiring, and then
wondering why you have monsters out there opening
fire because no one says, do what you
want. We'll support you. Put masks on. Don't
serve warrants. Don't identify yourselves. I mean, guys,
this is everything we're fighting.
But an act of terrorism. So the point
was that you have them breaking the law
everywhere, so they're being monitored. In many cases,
maybe they're going too far and deserve to
be charged with a crime. Just an obvious
point. But in this case and in fact,
I haven't seen examples of that, to be
quite honest. I'm sure they exist.
But here, you have a person who's doing
that, and all of a sudden
let's just even say everything they said is
true. All of a sudden, she rams the
guy with a car. Okay. Fine. That's a
crime. If it they if that's what happened,
it's not. That would be a crime.
Why would that, in any world,
taking everything they've laid out, even the lies
amount to domestic terrorism?
You know why? Because it's assumed or rather
they want you to assume that it's a
lefty thing, that that means Antifa, that that
means terror like, this assumption on assumption on
assumption that amounts to domestic terrorism as they
then work with terrorists everywhere in the world.
It's just kind of sad. Right? Because by
the meaning of those words, that's not terrorism
by any stretch of the imagination. Unless you
somehow can prove, I mean, even the idea
of Antifa, we already showed you that was
a they can't even materialize an argument for
what it is, where it's from, who's in
charge. It's pathetic.
But even say that, at least prove that,
but they won't because that's not there. This
is just
desperation. I mean, think about this. I mean
it. This ultimately, we have a person that
shot somebody and a US citizen, which appears
to be the first obvious example.
What are they gonna do? You're not gonna
come out and be like, oopsie. You're gonna
lie because Trump has told you to never
admit it. Never admit, deny, deny, deny. It's
what they've always done. Minnesota attorney general Keith
Ellison, in NPR's morning edition,
said that he disagrees with Noam's characterization of
good as a domestic terrorist.
Now, it might I mean, look. It it
I think it matters for some people
whether one person or not is Democrat or
Republican. It shouldn't. It should matter what the
facts show. So the person is this is
this is a person in Minnesota who was
simply saying from the government that he doesn't
agree with it. And he says, quote, she
was a compassionate neighbor trying to be a
legal observer on behalf of her immigrant neighbors.
That's what she was doing at the moment
of her death. And she was a poet.
She was a mom. She was a daughter.
And I'm deeply saddened by what happened to
her and her family.
Now the Minneapolis
mayor Jacob Frey said, quote, having seen the
video myself, which I'll show you, I want
to tell everybody that this is BS.
So let's watch.
Oh, and I I just wanted to point
this out. Interesting. That was what I was
saying a second ago. This is from December
31. Right? Parsing the rhetoric around the Minnesota
childcare fraud. Isn't it just a little bit
ridiculous that this just happened and over focusing
for plenty of obvious reasons, and then this
happens?
You know what I mean? Like, I don't
know. I I'm not suggesting that this was
planned and organized. I just think it's weird
that that always seems to happen. Maybe just
because they choose to pluck out events from
where they want you to look.
It's still not organic. Right?
Somali fraud pivot. We discussed this on January
1. You can check out our show.
Now here is Fox News. Photos released of
Renee Nicole Goode, who was the person who
was killed.
The US citizen killed by ICE in Minnesota.
Just to here's her picture here. You know?
A white, not a born in United States
American. Not that that should mean anything more
to anybody being killed. That's a human being,
whether they are immigrants, whether they're born somewhere
else, whether they have a different religion. But
the problem is that it seems to matter
more to certain people.
Right? So right now, it's the idea that
a US citizen
was killed
should be huge.
But it's almost unnerving
how much they're just trying to brush it
away as if it's just justified because they
drove at me.
It's, it's just wild to me. Like, more
than most things I've seen. This is, I
think, because of what they've allowed to happen,
not because they wanted this to happen. Not
or not in re not really. Because at
the end of the day, this is hard
this is problematic for them. But but the
point
that the images that were going around were
of somebody else. I actually think this is
meant to muddy the waters here. This is
not something I think was meant to happen.
I think this is a a very problematic
story for them that's already blowing up in
their face. And so I think what we're
seeing is a bunch of nonsense like I've
talked about in the past.
False images, so that people question whether what
they're getting is real. I've got an entire
point I've seen of partisans out there from
the right
claiming this was a false flag. Which we
should ask that every single time. But where's
the evidence of that? Claiming that ultimately this
was faked and it was a lie. Okay.
Maybe.
But what does that lead to if that's
not true? It leads to the igno
ignoring
the murder of a US citizen
as the story. Like I talked about in
the past, missing the forest for the trees,
where you get a large story. Lahaina, for
example, where there's tons of actually really relevant,
very interesting
side stories that with some of which don't
have a lot of evidence, but are, you
know, seem to be very important.
And we should focus on those things to
a degree. But what happened a lot of
the times, like in that example, was people
started focusing on the larger, abstract things and
stopped holding the government accountable for basic crimes
they were committing.
Never got held accountable, as far as I
can tell. All tons of crimes were committed.
But because it was about larger, you know,
points that we couldn't verify, and you got
morons like Stu Peters out there talking about
blue roofs, well, we missed the point, guys.
And they got away with murder. Literally.
So that's the thing we should consider right
now is the effort is to deflect from
the obvious right in front of you. Don't
fall for that. Now here is the video.
This is the four minute one, the full
video that's going around that I can find.
And then we'll play what well, actually, let's
play what Kristi Noem said first because it's
just it's kind of incredible to me.
You asked about a shooting that we just
had in Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
It was an act of domestic terrorism.
What happened, it was our ICE officers were
out in enforcement action.
They got stuck in the snow because of
the adverse weather that is in Minneapolis. They
were attempting to push out their vehicle, and
a woman attacked them and those surrounding them
and attempted to run them over and ram
them with her vehicle.
An officer of ours acted quickly
and defensively shot,
to protect himself and the people around him.
And my understanding is is that she was
hit and is deceased. We're continuing to gather
more information, but this goes to Minnesota.
It was an act of domestic terrorism.
What happened was our ICE officers were out
in an enforcement action.
They got stuck in the snow because of
the adverse weather that is in Minneapolis. They
were attempting to push out their vehicle and
a woman attacked
them and those surrounding them and attempted to
run them over and ram them with her
vehicle.
So remember that. Okay? Remember as you see
the video.
I mean, this is my point about this
is there there's nuance in some ways. You
could argue that maybe he had a justification
to do something.
But the idea that what you're claiming is
that ultimately this person that they they
rushed them
and had to react.
I mean, you you I mean, this is
my point about incompetence.
She must have seen something, or maybe she
doesn't know this video. I don't know. But
this is wholesale lying. Surrounding them and attempted
to run them over to push out their
vehicle, and a woman attacked them, and those
surrounding them and attempted to run them over
and ram them. Oh, yeah. The argument of
running them over only happened after she was
trying to turn away and she was open
fire on. So how this is like them
saying stop resisting and that justifies the arrest.
You can't argue that the action in response
to your stop is the reason you were
arrested. You can't even make that make sense
because you did it before it started. You
know? It's it's just it's crazy to me.
This is what they do. They know they've
got blind support. That's why. With her vehicle,
an officer of ours acted quickly
and defensively
shot, to protect himself and the people around
him.
And my understanding is Okay. Why would that
protect anybody else? Even if you thought she
was trying to hit you on the way
out. Because that's where it was aiming in
the other direction. Why would that protect anybody?
Right? Why would the assumption be she's gonna
swing back around and come running at you
with the car when you're all armed? That
doesn't seem like a very logical assumption. This
does not seem even and I'll get into
it more in a second. The the idea
of protecting yourself
well, wait to watch the video, and then
we'll make it more clear. Is is that
she was hit and is deceased. We're continuing
to gather more information, but this goes to
show,
the assaults that our ICE officers and our
law enforcement are under every single day. Yeah.
It sure does. The lie about it. For
sure. These vehicle ramming's are domestic acts of
terrorism.
We're working with the Department of Justice to
prosecute them as such. Of course. We will
continue to protect our our ICE officers. You
know, sort of like when they tried to
argue the people sitting in the streets for
terrorism,
you know, because that was ridiculous even though
it might bother you or anything on the
other side or not taking a shot or
talking about things. The left called you all
terrorists. Right? I mean, it's how do we
not how do we keep allowing ourselves to
fall into these ridiculous games?
As I say that, I don't think it's
actually happening in a majority anymore, and that's
what's so confounding about it. But think about
how wild that is. You know, you how
often you're you're a terrorist or a Nazi
because you got a red hat on. You're
doing the same thing right now. For those
of you that are actually somehow falling for
the trap, you're doing the same thing to
them the same way.
You're talking about a a
you're talking about people who are not justified
in being murdered and murdering them in the
streets because you claim doing this action that
they didn't even really do amounts to terrorism,
even though by definition it absolutely does not.
Noam is out of her depth as most
of these people are. As I said, ICE
and we're gonna go through these. ICE has
been already caught in court
lying about being run over to justify the
shooting of American citizens.
Let that sink in.
This is not even close to the first
time since the 2025
that ICE has lied about circumstances to get
away with murder. Now, technically, I should have
said,
attempted murder. I was just this is what
I put out earlier. The point was there's
one shooting that that amounted to murder, but
there as I said here, there's numerous times
they've already been used the run over lie
to justify their shooting, which easily could have
amounted to murder to children, to women, to
babies in the cars they were opening fire
on. But let's first watch this. But bear
in mind, they've already been caught lying about
exactly things like this, and here's a video
showing you they're lying now.
Remember how she started that? They they they
came up to them and they had to
defend themselves. Right? But watch very clearly as
they walk up to her car.
There's the third obvious deception.
Okay.
So their argument is that there's stuff that
was happening before this. There probably was. These
people are observers. They're watching them. Just like,
for example, the Free Thought Project, who I'll
shout out here in general, seeing as how
for the longest time, they've been doing,
what do they call it? Cop watching to
ensure that they don't break the law, and
in doing so, almost always catch them breaking
the law. Of course, because they don't wanna
be watched. That's why they're wearing masks and
identifying themselves.
But the point is, she's not breaking the
law.
All of the she they run up on
her
and say, get out of the effing car.
Okay. Who are you? Do you have a
warrant? What's going on? Like, these things matter
despite despite the screaming people out there claiming
to be America first and talking about liberty
who don't seem to want that to matter.
If you if you if you're of the
mind that this person was doing something wrong,
then why don't we verify that? Why don't
why why is the assumption that the power
that you claim you're fighting
is somehow always right?
It's lazy thinking. It's actually a lack of
logic, guys. So what they just did was
run up on the car, yell, Get out
of the car! Okay? And like we're gonna
go over in a moment,
many people have been in the position and
have driven away. Now look, I'm of the
mind very clearly that she knows who they
are. Not, like, personally, but that these are
officers. So, like other situations I'll show you,
the argument is that there's no justification, or
rather no,
there's no
reason to assume that they know that these
are not grifters.
As I've shown you many times in this
very conversation, guys,
I've seen there's already been examples of people
dressing up like ICE and robbing buildings, people
dressing up like authorities and peep raping women.
I've shown you these stories.
Because nobody's identifying themselves. They're not being required
to give warrants anymore. Why that is not
the biggest story in the world, I don't
know, to Republicans in particular.
So
my point is that in the past, people
have driven away because I'm not gonna risk
this. People don't even realize that the law
today, even though they'll never they'll probably arrest
you for even doing this, is that if
you're driving on the street, for example, and
you don't feel comfortable where you are, the
law states that you can continue to drive
until you feel comfortable pulling over.
Even if their lights are behind you for
twenty minutes. I just didn't like the area.
I want to pull somewhere safe. Of course,
there's a lot there's a, you know, a
a line to that.
But so I'm trying to get to the
idea that if you are in a situation
where you're in a threat and you don't
trust what's happening, maybe, you know, whatever it
is, you have a right to do that.
Driving away is not justification to kill people.
And I will show you the examples where
they did so knowing that they were not
being driven at, but were angry that they
weren't being listened to, and then lied about
being run over. So watch this. They run
up and say, get out of the car.
No. Backs up. No.
No. K. Do you see the guy right
there in the front?
He starts to draw his weapon.
Right?
What could he have easily done right there?
Moved out of the way.
Okay. So you may go, no. He's trying
to arrest her. Okay.
Well, what so what you're saying is then
the the obligation is to put yourself in
the way of the danger so you can
rationalize murdering the person? I I mean, you
have to understand that this none of this
is the way like, do you does anybody
even talk to cops anymore? This is not
standard operating procedure. What they're doing is op
and on top of the fact that your
life being at risk is a common reality
and that that's the job. And so using
that very risk, even though it's not there
to justify you this is like them shooting
chihuahuas because they claim their life's at risk.
I've seen that many times. A a a
chihuahua, not a joke, by the way. Shooting
the dog because it runs up to them
because they can get away with that.
That's I mean, that may be a stretch
for some people, but watch the guy. He's
in front of the car. He has time
to move out of the way as she's
starting to move the car. Wouldn't you do
that too? You have the license plates. Why
don't you just shoot her in the car?
Oh, shit.
Okay.
You can very clearly see, and I'll to
show a better picture, the guy shot as
she was driving by,
and he jumped out of the way. The
argument that he was injured is completely false.
On top of the fact that I'll show
you him walking away and getting into his
car. As Trump is claiming, he's in the
hospital. We don't even know he's alive.
That's how ridiculous these people are. Now I'll
play it all the way through.
No.
No. No. Shit.
Shoot. And see, here's the crazy part on
top of it. He fired two more shots
as she was going by. Why is that
happening? Wouldn't it be a reactionary shock? I
mean, like, it's just
everything about this is wrong. And if you
actually wanna look and and and listen to
honest cops or anybody else online, they'll tell
you that. There's plenty of people who are
in these positions going, these people are ridiculous.
But you don't get that from the mainstream
alternate media or even left or well, technically,
I'm I am seeing a lot of left
media covering this, but, overall,
the majority of the conversation, as usual, is
somehow rationalizing why this is the okay thing
to do.
No.
Shit.
Now. Oh my fucking god.
What the fuck? She's trapped in down there.
What the fuck?
You just fucking what the fuck did you
do? Sorry. There's cussing.
I mean, I You are fucking That's the
gist of the,
Fuck. Sorry. I was trying to get away
from old customers. What the
So basically, then it just, you know, they
they manage it from there.
I mean, this is the in the past,
this is where they'd be throwing down, you
know, guns with no serial numbers and dropping
cocaine in your front seat. Right? We've very,
very much happened a lot in the past.
Now, body cameras, but there's different ways this
goes, especially with ICE that doesn't identify themselves.
Why do you think they do that? Because
now, as we're gonna get into, nobody knows
who did what. Right?
In some cases, as we're gonna find, the
shooter. But in a general sense, when they
talk about who, and he's involved in past
incidents, who? What's his name? How do we
verify that?
It's literally unaccountable. And that's the whole point,
guys.
So let's get into some of this. Well,
first, let me go over some of these
examples. Then we're gonna get into how many
times this has happened before, and how clear
it is that they're lying.
Aaron Fisher says freeze frames for the specific
moments when the ICE agent draws and fires
pistol three times, killing the woman driving the
vehicle.
That is pretty clear.
I mean, you can look for yourself. You
can see. Look at the look at what
I mean, there's to pretend that this guy
was in danger or that ultimately he was
hit is a lie or went to the
hospital.
Here's Megyn Kelly
doing the dishonest thing that she does. Now
you could also point out that like a
lot of these people, Tim Poole included, who
I believe is right here,
you know, get sent something by people they
think they can trust, and they're always being
played by those people, sort of like Alex
does with the big big big sources he
gets. I mean, reality is, this is a
ridiculous
clip. And look, this is this is from
February yesterday.
You know? Aleika look at where the time
is on these. So there's access to better
content out there, but but here's what she
decides to
show. Oh, weird. All you get is the
video the the the sound of the the
the shot,
and then the car driving past
and hitting another car. And, of course, what
she tries to she wants to show, that's
so she's dead already, sadly enough, crashing into
that car. So what she wants you to
focus on is look at how it he
turn she turns towards the guy.
No. Not really, actually. If you care to
look at the actual video, Megyn Kelly, you
know, big big time journalist over here because
that's not true.
That's what she says.
Watch this. She accelerates into him. You just
watched the video the same as I did.
These people are jokes, guys. They are lying
to you or just always have been this
bad at their job. Remember, Megyn Kelly is
the one that not too long ago said
that Palestinians would rather let their children starve
to death than save a Jewish person. You
know, aside from the fact of how many
Palestinians are literally working with Jews, she's disgusting.
Or just very dishonest. Or both. Tim Pool.
It's terrifying that we have come to the
point where middle aged white women are willing
to kill federal agents for their ideology.
I mean, could who couldn't you couldn't write
a more
manipulative,
inaccurate characterization of what that was.
But this is what Tim Pool does. Now,
of course, you could argue he's trolling. The
same difference, though. The same thing they all
do. This is about deceiving people.
Almost a million views.
So
willing to kill federal agents. Walk me through
how that's what happened to him. Or for
their ideology?
So now this has become an ideologically
driven murder?
These people are a joke.
Like, I'm just there's just no way to
describe it. They're cartoons. This is absurd.
And it's clearly about an agenda. They killed
Charlie. You know? That's where they are. And
it's embarrassing because it's just simply it is
a at best, a wildly broad exaggeration
or assumption.
And, of course, the Trump comes out and
says, yeah. I can sell defense.
I've just seen the video
in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It's a horrible thing to
watch. The woman screaming was obviously a professional
agitator.
Are you kidding me? You see how they
don't they if you is that just your
wild assumption?
She's screaming because you murdered somebody, Donald Trump,
on top of the fact that she's been
there monitoring them and watching them break all
these laws. A professional agitator?
That's what he says with the signs and,
you know, you know what a professional it
doesn't matter. It frustrates me how dishonest they
can be. But the question is who's actually
buying it? I hope it's not a lot.
And then the woman driving the car was
very it was very disorderly,
obstructing and resisting, and then violently, willfully, viciously
ran over the officer. That's what he just
said.
Clearly, somebody told him this or he's just
lying on his own who seems to have
shot her in self defense.
Willfully, viciously ran her over ran over an
ice officer
who's based on the attached clip, it is
hard to believe he's alive.
That's what he just said.
You saw the clip, guys. There's not a
different version of that, but is now recovering
in the hospital. No. Did not. They've been
it seems they've even added on the whole
he briefly went there, but then was released.
That seems to be a lie.
This is how they operate. The situation is
being studied in its entirety. But the reason
these incidents are happening is because the radical
left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our law
enforcement officers. There's no evidence of that, guys.
Other than people who are individually taking action,
like in Dallas, that were arrested and killed
himself, and ultimately, then they tried to make
it about the left that actually petered out
because there's no evidence. What we can see
are people monitoring what they're doing while they're
doing things illegal.
And some of them taking liberties, some of
them take acting violently happens on left and
the right, and they should be charged for
those crimes. To argue,
this is some this is the Tom Homan
1000%
increase, which was a lie that we proved
to you at the time, and even Grok
will tell you is manufactured out of whole
cloth. They are just trying to do the
job of making America safe. No, they're not.
We need to stand by and protect our
law enforcement officers from this radical left movement
of violence and hate.
Right. Meanwhile, we're funding a genocide that kills
only Palestinians. Meanwhile, we're literally overthrowing countries for
our own personal agenda. Meanwhile, we're selling out
every possible American left and right to a
foreign agenda. Oh, yeah. Get the bad guys
on the left.
Oh, here. This is,
oh, just Shannon Joy responding, saying false in
what Trump said. This is the most comprehensive
and best video I've seen. It's the same
video.
On the assassination, these masked ICE criminals executed
American citizen in broad daylight who posed absolutely
no threat to him. She clearly turned the
wheel and evaded the end agent to to
flee. God bless the young woman who captured
this video. I don't care about her politics.
She's incredibly courageous and has done critical service
to the nation. Yeah. Some people have principles.
Erin Melnick
says there is no evidence that the officer
who shot the woman was injured at all
despite Trump's claim here that he's recovering in
the hospital. Immediately after the shooting, you can
see him walking completely normally and he stayed
on the scene for a while before driving
off, which I'll show you. I mean, here's
here's his kill shots. I'll show you the
video.
Shame. Now right there, you have his face.
So we damn well better figure out who
this person is, in my opinion. Oh, it's
right here. Steve Grove.
I knew I I figured I knew that
would happen. But so my point is they're
doing their best to keep this from being
discussed.
Now that's that's important. I wish I had
had it before because what's coming is a
point about them claiming he was dragged behind
a vehicle before.
JD Vance says, I want every ICE officer
to know that their president, vice president, and
the entire administration stands behind them. That's what
you do. That's what you do
when you murder somebody.
To the radical assault radicals assaulting them, doxxing
them, threatening them. Congratulations. We're going to work
even harder to enforce the law.
That's I mean, you can call whatever you
want. That is them doubling down because there's
nothing else you can do.
He also says, this is preposterous.
Oh, this this this guy,
he's a
a lawyer, I believe.
Says I'm oh, he says right here. I'm
a former defense attorney and currently civil liberties
attorney with no political dog in this fight.
I watched the video at least 10 times
from different angles and at different speeds and
waited to offer an opinion, which I still
reserve the right to change if additional information
changes. Every time. That should be the unspoken
reality.
It is very clear that the officers instigated
the confrontation.
The woman initially tried to waive them past
her, which you can see. ICE officers have
no authority to search a US citizen or
arrest her unless there's probable cause to believe
she's harboring undocumented individuals, not a contention here.
Doesn't that matter to people screaming about the
constitution?
The idea that you have any justification to
even initiate the stop because you don't like
that she's watching you
because they're committing crimes, guys. That's easy to
prove.
Like we just watched out. Right? So his
point is important. They have no authority to
do what they started doing. So when they
then use her actions in response to their
legal action,
that's not gonna work.
Even if they did she did what they
claim and she did not. A woman surrounded
by masked armed men who have no law
enforcement authority over
her as has every right to escape.
Think about that. Video shows her steering wheel
is turned to the right, clearly an attempt
to leave without hitting anyone and steer clear
of the officer standing towards the front of
the car. It's cell phone. That officer had
time to step aside, which is what I
pointed out, which is where he was when
he shot her.
Even a real police officer, which they are
not, that's important,
would not have the right to shoot at
her for trying to flee, which is what
they keep doing.
This is well established in the case law.
Deadly force may not be used simply to
prevent someone from getting away. That's why they
go with I feared for my life.
Given that the ICE officers had no law
enforcement authority to begin with, and the video
footage shows she was trying to escape a
perceived threat, not to kill anyone, the crime
is all the more excusable.
I'm praying for the victim's family, especially her
children. I'm also praying for all the conservatives
who are so unprincipled and lost, they're excusing
this terrible crime. And gloating over a death
that will leave three children motherless because of
the victim's politics.
I mean, is that the case? Is she
even a Democrat?
Right? I mean, again, I know the assumption
is because this, that, it's lazy, guys. Is
she a Democrat or not? Frankly, it doesn't
matter. He's right. The point is about the
the murder. But the reality is, like with
any of these things, being an observer of
a criminal activity because they're cry they're they're
constantly lying about these things, I know Republicans
who are doing that. On top of the
fact, like with Tommy Tone,
Tyler Robinson.
They make the same contention. Oh, he wore
a mask. He must be a democrat. Plenty
of republicans wore masks. Oh, you know, on
and on and on. It's the same thing,
and we still don't really have that verified.
They just go with what they want you
to believe. Same thing here.
It is very despicable what they're doing. And
I like I said, I don't really think
this is the majority of conservatives. I really
don't. I think it's the same old manipulative
liars out there doing the same thing. And
here and speaking of a manipulative liar, here's
Shady Vance. This is preposterous.
First of all, she was not waving the
officers through. Has no right to do so
even if she were.
What do you mean? You can't go get
out of my way?
That's not a valid argument. She's not she
waved she is waving another car through before
the officers approached her. Oh, and and you
know this because you're psychic?
You see how wild this is? This is
how he starts his argument. Second, the officers
are not randomly searching her. They're approaching her
vehicle because she's violating the law. Okay. Namely,
she's obstructing a law enforcement operation. Don't you
love that excuse? They use that against anybody
that's just bothering them.
It's not what's happening. You're not illegally
she's a US citizen driving her car. The
idea that they make the case like this
is dishonest, but that's what they do to
anybody who is like, this is how, like,
creating violence in a protest to shut the
whole protest down. That's the same thing they
do here. Right? That you are obstructing
operations.
Or usually they say that after you're stopped,
you know, resisting or they they use their
own actions to justify the next step. You're
not allowed to walk up to or drive
up to people who are enforcing the law.
Is he ridiculous?
I mean, I shouldn't even, yes, he is.
Guys watch this
right now. Watch as they walk up to
her car. I mean, you just, they're just
going with the narrative that he or the
rest of them are stating. Now the question
always becomes, is he aware of that?
Right? Is or is they buying the narrative
just like anybody else because they're either just
that stupid or that they're not even the
one setting the narrative? I I honestly don't
know. Because I would like to believe they
could make a better life than this. But
here he is, saying that's what happened was,
you're not allowed to walk up to them
or drive up to them. Well, that didn't
happen, bud. So you're wrong. Third, this defense
attorney is drawing a meaningless distinction between ICE
officer and police officer. He's really not. Especially
when we get into the reality of how
flimsy these people were trained in the first
place. Right? The idea that they cut it
down to simply forty seven days to make
sure he got more people out there. Or
that they're right now going, we need more
people. More people. No training.
That's the idea. On top but even if
they had normal training, they're they're not the
same thing. It's just not. He said and
they don't have the same authority in regard
to police enforcement. They do not. Again, she
he writes, you're not allowed to interrupt law
enforcement. Didn't happen. Which is exactly what this
woman was doing. No. She wasn't. Fourth. The
officer didn't discharge his weapon to prevent her
from fleeing. When he discharged his weapon, she
had pointed the vehicle at him. Did you
not re you can look at the video.
Again, guys. You can not only see that
she the wheels were turned. You can see
that she was turning in the first place
from and there's other videos in general. The
fact on top of it is that you
can watch that he was not even in
the way. It's not updating.
Anyway, you we just watched it three times
four times in a row.
You can see that he's not in the
way. And the fact that he fires after
she's by. You know, these are very important
points that anybody honest is going to engage
with.
I mean, what do you expect JD Vance
to do? Oh, yep. You got us. He's
a murderer. You know, we're we we did
this, and we're responsible. We've been covering up
for it the entire time. Of course not.
And, of course, Trump's orders are to never
admit fault ever. Have you once seen them
do that? And it's not unique.
When's the last time you saw a government
person ever say, I'm sorry. I made a
mistake?
Think about that for a second.
And and press the gas. I mean, come
on. You can literally see her break and
then go, gosh. This guy's a clown. He
discharged his weapon in self defense and other
angles of the video show the woman clearly
hit the officer.
Really? The the the that's the best view
you could possibly see where you can see
the gap between him and the car. What
you're doing is talking about Megyn Kelly's view
that shows him look like he got hit
because he backed away. That's dishonest. This gaslighting
is off the charts. I agree with that
part, and I'm having none of it. This
guy was doing his job. He's tried she
she tried to, to stop him from doing
his job. Again, no, he didn't. No, she
didn't. When he approached her car, she tried
to hit him. Simply did not.
A tragedy? Absolutely. But a tragedy that falls
on this woman, it's all her fault. All
the radicals who teach the people that immigration.
She's despicable, isn't it? Even if you argue
you disagree with what she was trying to
do, that this is somehow justifiable because they
made her I mean, it's bad, guys. This
is bad. The what these people are doing
is despicable at a level that I've never
seen before.
Because of the consistency of which would of
how they're doing this. Now, Matt Walsh doing
the same thing, says she was trying to
stage an illegal blockade of the road to
interfere with the ICE agents. Okay. Let's see
if we'll say it's true.
Why would that be what they make it
out? Like, the idea that you're in the
street trying to people from getting away with
what you would argue is illegal action because
they're not identifying themselves. They're not producing warrants,
and that would be real, by the way.
But okay. Let's just even say it's not
true.
The idea that you would then go to
the point of trying to shoot her to
stop her from getting out of the way
as she's turning to drive away is the
entire
point. And then rammed her car into one
of them. They're all doing the same thing,
guys. It's despicable. And as David Eichrally points
out, this is the face of the extreme
MAGA media today.
And I wanna be clear, I do not
think that represents the majority of MAGA or
conservatives or Republicans.
He says everything that the mainstream media has
long been, and that's important. He and I
share this point that these people are the
mainstream media today or at least the extension
of it.
A mother blatantly murdered by Trump's ICE,
a US citizen, is explained and lied away
with a lack of empathy and decency that
beggars belief.
Extreme MAGA is a is a psych is
is is psycho, psychopathic,
Just like extreme progressives.
See?
Some people can see it.
We need to take our world back from
psychopaths and authority and psychopaths that do their
bidding.
Well said.
Here is Pedro pointing out a Republican that
was on the scene that challenges what JD
Vance just screamed about.
First, he says, every congressional Democrat and every
Democrat who's,
running for president should be asked a simple
question.
Do you think this officer was right in
defending his life again? So they're trying to
make this a pivotal wedge dynamic because they
need people to justify
murder by the government because narrative
that gives them power over everything.
So you're now making a pivotal, but guess
what? Check out what's going on online. You're
gonna find a lot of Republicans who are
like, man, that's just crazy. I agree with
most of what you're doing, but that's a
step too far. There's a line for everybody
as I keep pointing out. So now he's
trying to make it something that you have
to side with. That's the cat turd dynamic.
You're on our side. You're on their side.
What do you like more? What do you
care about more? Do you wanna be part
of the Republican team? Or do you wanna
be correct and moral? Well, too many people
are gonna go, damn it. I wanna be
part of the team. Even people that might
be good in other ways.
I'm serious.
This is what they're doing. They're trying to
convince
low intelligent people decide with what they want
versus what they know is right.
He's a monster like the rest of them
are left and right. Do you think he
was justified? Well, he's not, period. It's obvious,
but he'll continue to force it. These people
are going to try to arrest our law
enforcement for doing their jobs. Okay. Are they
identifying themselves? No. Are they presenting warrants? No.
Are they been caught lying over and over?
Yes. I've been what are we talking about?
The least the lee, the least the media
could do is ask them about it. But
what? The least they could do is create
your division divisive binary tactic that's meant to
make people choose between what's right and what
they want?
Sad.
And Pedro says Vance is such a cynical
goon that he saw a widowed mom get
shot in the head, and his first thought
was, how can we spin this to improve
our electoral odds?
But here's a self described right leaning witness
who said that's not how we're supposed to
do things in America. You'd be surprised, prep
maybe not. Probably not if you watch the
show, by how many people are of that
mindset.
08:30 this morning, I was just getting up
and I heard,
bunch of commotion and whistling outside,
and then I heard bang, bang, bang, three
shots.
I went to go look out the window,
and it looked like, there's a Honda over
there that crashed. And,
I found out it was an observer that
got shot and killed,
and I saw them carry it. I got
a bunch of video of them carrying the
body to
ambulance and stuff. So, there's an observer that
got shot at an ice raid at the
house next door.
I'm I'm sure that was a scary thing
to have witnessed. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I'm
pretty
right leaning, but seeing this,
it's not what you need to do. It's
not how to do
it. It's not how we're supposed to do
things around here in America.
So What was the how many, like, agents
and other people were here when when When
it first started, there was maybe 20, but
now there's hundreds.
I mean, they got everybody out. So Right.
That that's called the Cash Patel effect. They
all rush over. They wanna be a part
of the scene, put their jackets on, women's
size, of course. And they go, you know,
I'm in charge. I'm here, and I'm present.
And I put my name on the list.
I'm kind of joking. What the idea is,
why would there be hundreds of agents?
Like, think about it for a second. That's
not like some developing story, like, or situation.
It's over. It's one one example, and it's
a big deal, though. Hundreds of agents?
I think it speaks for itself. I think
it's the culture they're creating, and it's pretty
damn embarrassing for most Americans if you're paying
attention.
It's kinda crazy right now. What's it been
like seeing all of this? Kinda scary. I
live so I live during the riots in
2020. So it's kinda paralleling that right now.
It's kinda
same
feeling.
Hoping it doesn't. Hoping it doesn't, but it's
it's getting a little rowdy.
And, of course, right, you could argue he's
lying about being being right leaning, which I've
already seen people making the point like, oh,
he called an observer. It's like, you know,
not everybody is as blindly adherent to the
extreme side of right and left. Most people
exist in the middle, which is what I'm
trying to show everybody. And so maybe he
made it up to make a point, maybe
not. I mean, the point is there's plenty
of people out there that very much,
you know, exist within the reality of morality
and and, you know, have some kind of,
boundaries, I guess. But that's important, I think.
And you'll find it's more common than you
realize if you take the time to look.
7 Seas makes an excellent point. Here's Nicholas
Fluntas, of course, like all the rest seeming.
Everyone who obstructs ice should be arrested immediately
enough is enough.
See?
They always show themselves, guys. I mean, look,
maybe he just believes that. You know? Like
like, there's plenty of points to make about
just like I always say, just because somebody
says something that I find to be almost
hard to believe doesn't mean they're immediately you
shouldn't be like, they're a shield then, or
they're fighting for the agenda. It's but I
think it's important. Right? Like I say with
Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's out there calling big
things out. But then, for
even right now, radical left terrorism,
which, again, there does extreme there exist extremism
on all sides to make that it can't
but one, it it's the agenda, guys. So
this, enough is enough? I mean, he's not
stupid, guys. You know he understands the reality
of the constitution, the idea that they're not
presenting warrants. You can prove all this stuff.
That they've killed people. They've arrested American citizens.
He's probably even criticized it, but now you're
going absolute all the way down. If they
do it, they should be shot or they
should be, arrested on-site?
No. If they're breaking the law, then they
have no justification to arrest anybody. And it
says the feds have the authority to deport
illegal immigrants. Yeah. Sure they do. That's that's
irrelevant to what we're talking about. It doesn't
matter whether it's that what they're doing or
they're enforcing anything else.
It's about the law and our constitutional rights.
It's what he pretends to care about in
some cases. Trump has a political mandate for
mass deportations. I hate that argument. It doesn't
mean anything at the way our broken system
works, especially when you realize the voting system
is not what we tell ourselves it is,
as even they'll argue when it suits their
interests.
A political mandate means that a small majority
of a minority of people who are involved
in our little general elections decided
that he should be elected for many reasons.
One of them being that
for some of them. But, yeah, they all
agree.
Lazy thinking and simply manipulation. But
this is an insurrection, he says. It should
be put down with the force of the
federal government. That's Nick Fuentes.
I mean, it speaks for itself, as Derek
says. Shut up, bootlicker.
I mean, you're calling for you're calling an
insurrection because this woman was killed. And the
fact that you fought the full force of
the government?
Guys, this is the problem. That is what
he's doing right there. That is the large
agenda, and he's a part of it. Whatever
else is happening,
doubt these people, please.
K? Associated Press, an ICE agent fatally shot
a woman accused of trying to run over
officers.
Oh, that that's what this was, this person
simply points out, when you think about this
in the context of Israel, the overlap,
an ICE agent fatally shot a woman accused
of trying to run over officers and her
crackdown on immigration. As he points out, it's
the exact same way they write about killing
people in the West Bank.
Really think about that for a second and
how we see them talk about this.
You know? Some kid was throwing a stone.
They make up this random story. Or, you
know, it's it's about the the rationalization of
the execution of somebody, which happens all the
time in the West Bank. Now it seems
to start in this country.
Same point here. Jasper says, indistinguishable from IDF
language. Here's Homeland Security. Today, ICE officers in
Minneapolis were conducting the targeted operations when rioters
began blocking ICE officers. One of those rioters
weaponized her vehicle, attempted to run over the
law enforcement. You saw the video.
This is IDF textbook stuff, guys. It's what
they do every day.
Oh, wait.
Oh, I I missed one. Hold on. I've
suddenly remembered just now that there was the
7 Seas Point. I'm gonna make sure I
went back to that because that was that
was that started this point. Hold on.
Oh, yes. It was right here.
Glad I remembered that. So Nick we went
over Nicholas Flunt as saying what he just
said.
Insurrection. Government has to crack down on everybody.
Well, as seven seas rightly points out, ICE
is infiltrated, trained,
and equipped by the IDF. Well, so too
is most of our police forces. This is
easily verifiable
from the top at the very least. But
even individual people on the lowest of the
rungs are are being trained in some cases.
They've openly sup have discussed this. On top
of the fact that their tools they're using
are all largely Israel influenced or created. But
and that's again,
it's dismissed by people who wanna make it
that we're upset. Look into this stuff.
It's on the surface. It's not some tangential
point. The Palantir, for example, they're completely immersed.
They joined strategically with Israel in regard to
their operations. They're spying on you. The US
government has a strategic partnership with the with
AI, which gives them access to all of
what they're using to train their AI, which
is everything they have on you. These are
these are verifiable points. On top of the
fact I mean, I can go on forever.
The idea is that there's an, an overlap
that goes well beyond just an overlap. Their
national counterterrorism
seminars take place in Israel, ICE.
Many of these trips are organized and funded
by non governmental organizations such as the Anti
Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, and the
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. They use
Israeli spyware. They do. They use Israeli methods.
They do. They support these really caucuses.
Now I was I I knew I was
gonna bring this up.
And this is really just a guy talking
about it, but it still makes the point,
and it's it's valid. And it goes way
beyond just
what
he
mentions.
The most chilling thing I've seen responding to
these immigration rates. I'm an immigrant rights attorney,
and usually, I'm a pretty optimistic guy. I
don't get scared easily. I love watching horror
movies. Over the past six months, I've seen
some really disturbing stuff. At one location, people
hid when I showed up, and I still
found them using a thermal drone that detects
body heat. Where was this technology first tested?
By Israel in occupying Palestine.
When people get taken by ICE, they often
refuse to say their names. So ICE identifies
them using a facial recognition technology.
Where was this tech first used? By Israel
in occupied Palestine. When people refuse to let
ICE search their phones, ICE will plug their
phones into this box, and it unlocks their
phone. Where was this tech first used? By
Israel in occupied Palestine.
The amount of dystopian tech that the US
government has taken from Israel to use in
its own country is terrifying, and this is
what
So I agree.
I think it's very important to understand that
overlap.
And it doesn't have to make it all
about Israel, just that's an important point. Like,
I think it's obviously relevant while this government
is publicly not only committing genocide, but praising
it, normalizing it, acting like this is justified.
It matters from their mindset. Absolutely.
And then then Zion Zionism observer who we
mentioned at the beginning of the show, I
think just relevant overlap
while they're being trained by these people. Well,
here's Israeli soldiers on the sixth who carry
out a school shooting.
That's not some kind of euphemism, guys. Three
students were shot. Israeli occupation soldiers chased students
with gunfire, tear gas, during their incursion into
the, Bersite University campus in Ramallah. I mean,
I I'm just blown away by the brazenness
of what they're doing lately. It's beyond what
we've seen before. Three students injured by Israeli
forces.
Israeli occupation forces raided Birzea University firing tear
gas, live ammunition, which led to several students
suffering from suffocation. 8,000 students trapped inside the
university.
People were shot.
That's a school shooting, guys, for whatever the
justification or rationalization. And think about what that
does to the people, to their lives. This
is what they're being trained by.
And as Henry and many others pointed out,
as their the the juxtaposition of the two
of them, I'll play it for you. The
party told you to reject the evidence of
your eyes and ears. It was their final,
most essential command.
Now, I I don't see don't think I
have it downloaded, but, you know, here she
is telling you, terrorist act, and they they
she tried to random or she rushed up
to them, and you could watch for yourself
that they're lying to you.
But as you can see and also, that's
really important to make the note of, even
though we've already kinda said it. We all
should be taking note right now of anybody
who is out there trying to tell you
otherwise.
You can look for yourself.
Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh and all of
the rest of the usual suspects are out
there trying to convince you that that's not
true. Trying to convince you that it's some
kind of a coordinated domestic terrorism radical
exactly like you were being called a terrorist
back when it was not what was happening.
Think about
it. So
Ashraf Ghassani also points out, in a video
an unverified video from Minneapolis,
of a doctor,
or at least claiming to be a doctor,
at the scene, claiming to want to help
her before or at least possibly before she
was dead.
And they didn't care.
I can I go check a poll? No.
Back up. Now. I'm a physician. I don't
care. I understand. We got EMS coming. I
get it. Just give us a second.
We have medics on scene.
We have our own medics. Where are they?
Where are they?
How can I relax? You just killed my
fucking neighbor. You caught butter in the fucking
face. You killed my fucking neighbor. How do
you show up to work every day? How
the fuck do you do this every day?
You're killing my neighbors. You're stealing my neighbors.
What the fuck, man?
Yeah.
Clearly paid agitators. Right, Trump?
Right? Who cares that you can prove that
they live right there and and that they're
doing this because you're abducting people from their
neighborhood without justification?
By the way, I'm not even talking about
illegal immigrants, guys. Even that though, without knowing
what's going on, which we can prove to
you 10 times over, they're just scooping people
up without proving that. That's why they keep
accidentally getting US veterans and accidentally getting US
citizens, many of which they then
abuse.
Like,
Rita's, the US veteran who they held for
days and didn't let shower. He was a
veteran and a US citizen. They he just
didn't they didn't like the way he made
them feel stupid for arresting him. He's done
a whole interview about this. I mean, it
just pains me. So the main point though,
relax.
Be we got someone coming. She died there.
She died right where they were standing, and
here they are
pushing away people that wanna help her. Doesn't
that also feel very much like what Israel
does every day? You don't have to make
that point, because it's despicable regardless.
But I still think it's relevant to who
trains the mindset, guys. But either way, I
just it makes me sick that anybody's out
here, like we just pointed to, acting like
that's somehow justifiable.
Any part of it. And then lying, gaslighting
about what they are, what they're doing.
Like I said, there's far too many people
out there who are standing up and screaming
down everyone's throats about the opposite, the lie.
We need to be real about who they
are and call that out.
Brianna j, Joy Gray, to get into some
examples, points out something we've all talked about
in the past.
Remember this? The Las Vegas overlap? Daniel Shaver?
A a random American citizen who just happened
to come out of his room, and they
told him to get down on the floor.
He's sobbing as he gets on the floor.
And the guy was literally trying to pull
his shirt back down. And after he was
squ crying and saying, I'm I'm in, you
know and they shot him dead in that
hallway. I'm sure y'all remember it. Not worth
playing again.
It's set it's terrifyingly sad.
The point is, guys, as she writes, moreover,
she was following orders, the one we just
saw. Eyewitnesses have also added on that she
was being given mixed directions, which, by the
way, is one of the most common things
we hear about the way these all go
down because they've got different
authorities, different,
you know, police and ICE. And then half
the time, these ICE body,
bounty hunters, excuse me,
don't even they're they don't even know what
they're supposed to be doing, and they're just
completely ill they, you know, contradicting each other.
I mean, that's real. You could look it
up. It's wildly common right now. And that's
one of the issues from before. She was
told to leave, told to go, told to
back up, And then when she did, they
got they ended up opening fire in one
of these cases because she did what the
other one said.
Eyewitnesses said she was being given mixed directions,
which is a classic trick that police use
to provide cover for murdering people. That's another
way to frame it. Or it could just
be incompetence and they just use it anyway.
But I want you to remember this. You
know? That what were what these people are
capable of and how it's completely unjustified and
how nobody was really held accountable for it.
Tim says, I'm not easily shook these days,
but the number of people who think the
appropriate punishment for not following a mass federal
agent's order is assassination
is rather shocking.
Branko Marcetic points out, according to another eyewitness
on the scene, ICE, which we should question,
there's a lot of political motivation flying around,
but not no we should question but also
shouldn't dismiss without investigation.
Saying that ICE gave the woman they killed
contrary to instructions, then aggressively surrounded her vehicle.
One told her to leave, then the other
complied. Another tried to open the car door
and and told her to get out while
the while the killer got in front of
her. Now, we kinda can see that when
you can break down with the guy coming
to the door handle.
But this is, the this both matches up
with the other eyewitness accounts and what we
can all see with our own eyes in
the video of the murder.
I agree.
Here is when they celebrate.
Now I really want I that just we
don't have to dwell too long on this,
guys, but think about this. Even if everything
that they told you was true, and we
know it's not,
why in the world would you celebrate and
high five after murdering a US citizen?
And the only thing I can think of,
and this is why I'm showing you Joe
Lonsdale discussing killing commies and executing leftists,
is whether or not there is an ideological
drive here or just the political motivation to
think that these people are all evil, disgusting,
anti left, you know, left radical monsters because
that's what they're being fed.
Or
they're just disgusting people who high five about
military adventurism in America.
But she says they murdered her and then
celebrated on camera while her blood was still
drying on the earbag.
Now if I played the audio, you just
hear of a screaming over the top, but
look at them.
That's them. High like, basically, congratulating each other,
and you can sort of hear overall the
screaming.
I just don't understand how anybody can make
unless you are a just a size
a borderline psychopath, how we cannot be outraged
about this.
And this is Eric Daugherty, he was the
one I was trying to remember before, doing
the same thing he always does. Red flashing
light. What they just did was great. Whatever
it is. Fill in the blank.
And here he is going, holy crap. JD
Vance is livid. Well, you know, a usual
response to being shown to be a liar
is to act outraged.
Typical. And as usual, Elon Musk goes, true.
That's his algorithmic game. Where you just go,
that thing is up, you know, and you
raise up whatever you want. So as we
continue to see,
as I think I think I have a
post in here like this from him, is
that he's out there literally
algorithmically upping every single post he can find
that makes the false argument about what happened
here. It's what he did with Venezuela in
the past. It's what he did with South
Africa. It's what he does with Haiti and
every other conversation that we've proven they've been
lying about.
You think this is not by accident?
Oh, wait. I think it's right here.
When I was actually walking out here,
somebody sent me a photo of a CNN
headline about what happened in Minneapolis.
Or you could point out a number of
other articles that aren't perceived as being as
partisan. But there's a reason it's about CNN
to trick people who are not smart enough
to think it's a Democrat lie without caring
to look like the Epstein files.
This is the headline. I'm just gonna read
it.
Outrage after ICE officer kills US citizen in
Minneapolis. Well Yep. Yep. Exactly what happened. Right?
Well,
that's one way to put it. Yeah. And
that is the way that many people in
the corporate media have put this attack over
the last twenty four hours. And I Otherwise
known as exactly what happened.
What am I missing? Like, that's not even
spun.
Outrage after ICE kills US what how that's
crazy to me. Like, so, Joe, if if
let's just say there was a crime being
committed, would that not change? You know, I
I I'd overthink it, but
or over you know, I just it's there's
points like this that aren't necessarily worthy of
spending so much time on, but it just
it's just so obvious.
He's just trying to manipulate people who aren't
smart enough to stand by their own opinion.
I say attack
very, very intentionally because this was an attack
on federal law enforcement. This was an attack
on law and order. This was an attack
on the American people. Of course. Right.
What didn't happen is an attack on all
of you. Be outraged and join with whatever
I say next. The way that the media,
by and large, has reported this story has
been an absolute
disgrace and puts our law enforcement officers at
risk. See, people who aren't you know, maybe
don't even know enough about it are swayed
by forceful talking
just by this speech will end up walking
away going, yeah, dumb Democrats. Well, I know
what's going on. I trust these guys.
He's lying to you, and it's very easy
to prove. Every single day. What that headline
leaves out is the fact that that very
off ICE officer nearly had his life ended,
dragged by a car.
Dragged.
Apparently, he was dragged by a car. I
guess we missed that in the video. Six
months ago, thirty three stitches in his legs.
So you think maybe he's a little bit
We're gonna get into that next, actually. Now,
by the way, I the reason I jumped
at that is because there has been even
Trump in other context have stated that he
was dragged by the car, not probably misunderstanding
that that's something they claim happened before. But
they've done this. They do it all the
time. It's like Trump's NS 13 thing. They
just kinda blend and mash it all together.
But my point is we don't we don't
get the information
about who's involved in previous ones even though
we got his name now from his face
as Internet's saying anyway.
Previously,
they've kept these things, their names out. This
is why they do that. So there's no
accountability. I'm gonna go over all the examples
I have of
alleged being dragged by the car and ice,
and there isn't they've all been proven to
be lies. I'll go over them. So he
this who knows? What he's stating right there
could very well be something we don't know
about. Guess that's possible.
Sensitive about somebody ramming him with an automobile.
Rammed. Ramming him. What that headline leaves out
is that that woman was there to interfere
with a legitimate law enforcement operation Otherwise known
as observing them as they break the law.
That look. Whether you like it or not
or agree with what's currently happening, as I
that's why I mentioned the Free Thought Project,
people like Matt Agaras, like Jason Basler, and
the rest of the team there, they've been
doing cop watching for a long time because
it's important, because they need to know that
we're paying attention, because
more often than not, they get caught breaking
the law in some way or showing that
they don't even understand the law. That's important.
That's what they're doing here too. It's the
same thing. Now you can disagree with that,
even though, in every sense, the Republicans will
be the ones siding with what Matt and
them are doing. Now, because it's being framed
as a Democrat thing, people just blindly resist.
It's the same thing.
Now, in doing that, which is not a
crime, yes, you can do things that then
break the law.
Is that what she did? Doesn't appear to
me. But, again, as as the other guy
said, I say every time, there may be
more information that comes out that then changes
the situation. Maybe she's caught on video earlier
doing something, but it still would not change
the illegality or rather just the unjust nature
of what happened.
But as it stands right now, and even
if there was something before, you can see
you're turning. You can see he wasn't hit.
They're lying about it. All this matters. But
I'm of the mind that there wasn't even
some illegal act taking place other than they
don't like that they're being monitored. Or they
claim by being there, you're somehow obstructing your
operation and they and they use that to
push you out of the way. I've watched
them on video and shown you people being
pushed to the point of, like, knocking their
head on the ground and having a concussion
because they were simply watching them.
Old
women, young kids, I've shown you these on
the show.
In The United States of
fear with a legitimate law enforcement operation in
The United States Of America. What that headline
leaves out is that that woman
has is part of a broader left wing
network.
Oh, okay. See, there's here's how we try
to make it abstractly into some terrorism overlap.
What network are we talking about? Is it
just because she is identifying as a lefty?
That becomes the lefty network. Yeah. That's how
they frame this. It could be. Or is
it because she's observing them? Is she part
of an organization that likes to watch their
maybe. Is that a network? Is that no
different than saying you're part of the Republican
team who's trying to push back on them?
Are you part of that network too?
You could use those terms, but he's trying
to make it sound like some kind of
organized, manipulative,
professional agitator.
That's what he's doing.
To attack, to docks, to assault
Exactly. Victim blaming. Thank you, miss Pennywise from
the chat. That's exactly what he's doing.
Network to attack,
to dox, to assault, and to make it
impossible for our ICE officers to do their
job. I mean, again,
doxing, I'd love for you to point these
things out. Pointing out who they are, what
their names are, which is legally required, is
not doxing. They keep pushing that lie.
If there's addresses being put out, then, yes,
that should be that's called out. I haven't
seen that personally. Or the idea that they're
trying to stop what they're doing, they're breaking
the law.
I'm I'm gonna continue to stress that. That
matters to me. It should matter to everybody.
You can't just keep pretending, like, getting in
their way or documenting what they're doing is
a problem. On top of the fact that
if you can prove they're breaking the law,
it's our obligation as American citizens to be
there, to call it out. It's in fact
his obligation. He just doesn't care.
If the media wants to tell the truth,
they ought to tell the truth that a
group of left wing radicals
have been working tirelessly, sometimes using domestic Tirelessly.
Terror techniques to try to make it impossible
for the president of The United States to
do what the American people elected him to
do. Yeah. The one of the things. Right?
See, that's my point. Apparently, the only thing
he ran on was just deporting people illegally,
and they were like, yay. No, guys. There's
a huge discussion about immigration,
but that's one factor for a ton of
people and many of the you know, but
that's just what they do. But terrorism tactics.
Wing radicals have been working tirelessly, sometimes using
domestic terror techniques. What's that?
Sometimes using domestic terror techniques? I mean, what
are we talking about? I'd love for you
to flush that out because what you're basically
saying is they're terrorists because we're insinuating
the techniques they use overlap with what we
claim other people do. But But apparently, that's
three hops away, so according to them, you
go to jail. That's the way the world
the way that they run this today. To
try to make it impossible for the president
of The United States to do what the
American people elected him to do, which is
enforce our immigration laws. The president stands with
ice. You don't need to murder American citizens
on the street to enforce immigration laws. In
fact, what we'll get to in the ending
here is the reality of what they're actually
doing, which is pretty much focusing on you,
Americans.
You may not wanna believe that, but it's
pretty clear where this is going, especially with
the numbers they're putting up, especially with all
the other agendas, and especially with seems who
seems to be driving this and what they're
aiming at. But overall,
I think it's very important to see the
larger kind of overlap in the immigration dynamic
and what it amounts to. And on top
of the fact that the majority of people,
and I mean the majority, you can quite
easily prove are clearly not the worst of
the worst. The rapists and all the stuff
they were, that's just not what's happening. You
can prove in almost every sense they're working
along the people like that, like the MS-thirteen
overlaps in El Salvador that you can prove
they're literally working with with Bukele. But we
don't talk about that. Or the fact that
they dropped the charges and sent it back
to Bukele, who he works with, where they're
not being held accountable.
But that's okay, though.
I stand with ICE. We stand with all
of our law enforcement officers. And part of
that is recognizing that you people in the
media, not everybody in this room, but many
people in this room have been lying about
this attack.
She was trying to ram this guy with
his with her car. He shot back. He
defended himself. He's already been seriously wounded in
law enforcement operations before, and everybody who's been
repeating the lie that this is some innocent
woman who was out for a drive in
Minneapolis.
I I mean, nobody's saying that. Everybody I've
talked to, everyone I reported on is talking
about observing them, doing what they're doing. He
can't even lie about that because you understand,
I think they're very aware that there's a
difference there. They want you to think the
lie is just some, you know, out gallivanting
in the street. You know? It's just it's
not what's happening. They can't even be honest
about that.
When a law enforcement officer shot at her,
you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Every single one of you. Questions? Yeah. Good.
Just just gaslight. Gaslight.
Well, nobody believes you, man. So it doesn't
really matter,
including a lot of Republicans. I hope that's
clear.
So let's get into some examples. Now I
find this to be one of the most
important parts, but like I
said, it's at the end today because ultimately
this is
I mean, very easy to prove. It's literally
looking at it versus what they're saying. And
I don't know why we'd have to overfocus
unless I mean, if we have to overfocus
on things like that, then that means there's
no chance of us winning in this. And
I don't believe that. That's why I'm pointing
out the people in conservative movements or alternatively
during COVID and even right now on the
left as well, that people aren't buying it.
Because I think that does show you the
bigger picture of how clearly people are waking
up. And it it
how does that not make them desperate? They
need that control to be able to execute
this, to control your life, and it's not
working. So here is a guy saying, the
agent shouldn't have shot her. And it says
officers are trained to treat a vehicle being
driven at them as a deadly force. They
have seconds to respond. They don't know the
driver's intent. And this is all very true.
They're in real time, not hindsight. That's why
they respond with force. Otherwise, this happens. And
it's just a video of a guy getting
hit with a car. Yeah. Certainly possible. Clearly,
that's not even close to what we just
saw, but let's engage with the point, though,
before we get to Musk.
Right? So the idea I mean, it's worth
pointing this out because it's a fair point.
Is that at the end of the day,
a police officer is put in a position
to make real time decisions of life and
death in some of those circumstances,
not every time life and death, where, you
know, they're afforded that the the
ability to make that choice in real time.
So the argument often goes that how do
we have a right to criticize
when they're in that you know, when they're
put in the well, because there's peep because
not everyone is just morally sound. Okay? Not
every person that holds that position is just
by default a good person. That's how they
love to frame it. That's how Vance and
them would love to pretend like we're all
the virtuous people fighting for freedom, and they're
all the evil democrat. The point is that
whatever side you're looking at, in any group
of human beings, there's gonna be despicable people.
There's gonna be people who wanna cheat and
lie and steal and rape and murder, guys.
It's not I'm not there's different percentages, obviously.
It's not everywhere everywhere, but it's the truth,
and you know it. Whether left, whether right,
whether Christian, whether Jewish, it doesn't matter, guys.
It's always a part of the world.
And so the dishonesty is to try to
make it about one side or rather your
adversary, even when it's not always the case.
So in this case,
you have people that could take advantage of
that. We saw this in the past. Shooting
people they want to, dropping drugs on people
they wanna hold accountable, or rather,
unjustly put in jail. You know? It's it's
been happening our entire lives. So in this
case, when he asks, you know, or talks
about the the the choice,
well, there's a line there. Obviously, there should
be a level of,
I couldn't think of it a second ago.
You know, we should afford them that to
some degree. I really do agree with that
because there are honest people too. I also
we shouldn't also just pretend every cop is
a dishonest monster. We should
consider that, question all of them, like I
say about politicians or anybody in power, but
while being open to the information.
Don't assume. But question them because I'd argue
honest ones would demand that of us. I'd
like to believe. So you give them a
little bit of that leeway. Right? Where you
wait for a situation to pull you know,
ultimately, they have the right to decide. And
if it's a a very fine line that
we can't define that we can't, you know,
like, if it was really close, if you
watch that video and it was a really
fine line,
you could argue that maybe he did feel
for his life, and that would be a
very thing a very hard thing to disprove
or say he didn't. But since we can
see that wasn't the case, then it's obvious,
ultimately, they're trying to fudge that line. But
I'm just a little trying to make clear
that there is a very fair argument about
honest police officers getting put in positions where
maybe they respond incorrectly.
And maybe that ends up being something harming
or even lethal. I feel like that should
be taken into consideration because not everybody's dishonest.
But, again,
we have to be honest about that line.
And if we're in a position where you
can see that they're lying about that, then
that line goes it's thrown out the window.
So they should be held accountable. And so
that is an important discussion. But when we
have this kind of evidence, it ultimately doesn't
matter. And they're just trying to use that
allowance to then ultimately say no matter what
they do, it's always right. Well, doesn't that
sound familiar?
The president do it. It's not illegal.
Right? Trump saying, well, he's the president of
Israel. Let him go. It's it's what they're
doing right now. They don't want to ever
be held accountable.
So Elon Musk says, the same ice agent
was almost killed several months ago by a
guy that at hit him with a car
and dragged him under
Well, I I can't verify
that, seeing as how we don't really know
who was involved with what because they're never
identifying themselves. Well, let's go through this.
Noam says ice officer who killed woman had
been dragged in vehicle ramming months before.
And this this one part on this I'll
say I'll show you. It says this appears
to be an attempt to kill or to
cause bodily harm to agents at the act
of domestic terrorism. That's what we just showed
you. Think about the way she's framing that
with what we just saw. Noem said the
officer who fired the shots was briefly treated
at the hospital and was now with his
family. Again, I think that's completely false. I
mean, oh, wait. Maybe I,
I wouldn't close that. I showed you the
still shots. Maybe I had a video.
You'll find it. It's everywhere.
Oh, there's that that's what I was looking
for earlier.
There's a there there's the video of him.
There was a still shots of it just
walking to his car. It's widely documented. And
and if he walked to his car, got
away, if he stuck stayed around and was
engaging with the scene, certainly possible that something
happened, but it wasn't from that car that
didn't hit him. So what are we talking
about?
We've seen over a 100 of these vehicle
rammings happen in just the recent weeks, Noam
lies about.
Oh, yeah? A 100 of them? I'm sure
you only managed to tell us about a
few of them because you're just so busy.
Right? Do we really believe that a 100
people ran with cars and they just didn't
tell us that? My point is, you can't
find a 100 examples.
Why would they be so frivolous, so completely
transparent with their lies? I just don't even
get it. Make it 20. That's crazy. Right?
It's also a
lie, though. ICE alone, she goes on to
continue to lie, facing 13 ton 1,300
increase in assaults. Now it's 1,300.
That's also a lie. Again, ask look it
up, ask rock, do whatever you want. The
truth is that that was pulled out of
nowhere. Tom Homan just mumbled that and everyone
went along with it because the lie is
about making you the victim.
Now there's clearly, I'm sure, people acting legally
happens to police officers all the time. Doesn't
mean that it's some increase. It means they're
using what they want you to think is
happening to justify a crackdown on your life,
starting with who you think you're aiming at,
but, of course, it comes back to you.
It always will. In fact, she writes, or
it continues, the very same officer who was
at Hack Today had previously been dragged by
an anti ice rider rioter who rammed him
with the car and dragged him back in
June. So June,
I can't find an example in June. Could
doesn't mean it didn't happen. Here's January,
or this is the article from recently discussing
from CBS News a few examples. And we've
talked about every one of these. The fatal
shooting of a woman in The U of
of, in ICE enforcement in in Minneapolis on
Wednesday recalls shootings by federal immigrants,
immigration agents, excuse me, in Chicago during the
height of the operation Midway Blitz in the
fall.
09/12/2025.
An ICE agent shot and killed an undocumented
immigrant from Mexico in Franklin Park, Illinois.
DHS claimed at the time that a 38
year old Silvero,
Villegas Gonzalez,
a father of two, had tried to use
his car to drive him to the agents
when they tried to detain him. You'll find
the exact same story over and over. DHS
officials
also claimed the ICE agent who opened fire
had been dragged by the car and suffered
severe injuries. I'm thinking this is the one
they're claiming, by the way, guys. Because I'm
I'm telling you, I there is not an
example that I can find that makes this
make sense, and September is close.
But surveillance video from two local businesses showed
Gonzales backing up, driving away while an agent
was on either side of the car. We
showed you this.
The agent on the passenger side continues standing
there, but the agent at the driver's seat
can't be seen.
In and in body cam video released two
weeks later, the agent is heard describing his
own injuries as nothing major after the shooting.
It's and and this has come out very
clearly. Now, they did the same thing where
the guy got was by the car and
tried to act like he got hit because
they opened fire and killed somebody.
This is covering your own butt here. It
says DHS, and it says I got dragged
a little bit.
Not really though. Again, we've shown you all
these. It basically just got bumped.
DHS claimed that Gonzales was being targeted by
ICE agents because of a criminal history that
included reckless driving.
They did that because they needed to make
it sound like it's he has a history
of reckless driving.
However,
CBS News investigators found that he had only
had a record of traffic violations, including
speeding,
expired driver's license, not having insurance, and having
a child restraint seat that was missing.
Of course, they lie about reckless driving because
they need to make up a story. Guys,
this is wholesale lying. So if we know
they're doing this, and this is only the
first example, why would we ever trust what
they're doing everywhere else? Noem and Bondi and
Trello, everybody else backed up the lie. They
do every time.
10/05/2025,
federal agents shot a woman in this in
the city's Brighton Park neighborhood after DHS officials
said that they they have been boxed in.
Remember this one? That was a lie. Five
protesters opposing immigration enforcement. Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
This was a lie.
DHS claimed US Customs and Border and, Border
Patrol agents see, it's always an overlap too.
That's why they get conflicting information. Because I
would argue Border Patrol agents in many cases
are much more well trained. And I guess
they can be. Today, it's getting the same
way.
As well as there's often local police. So
you get bounty hunters out there doing whatever
they want. People trying to do the right
thing or whatever. But
and that one driver had a gun. Remember
that story? Which they claim was a semiautomatic
weapon, also a lie. As a result, DHS
said agents opened fire striking the driver. The
agents fired five shots while the driver was
still inside the car.
The driver was later identified as 31 year
old, Marmar Martinez.
Now here's the crazy part, guys. They lied
about the gun, they lied about being boxed
in, they opened fire on this woman, then
they bragged about it, just like we just
saw. So what's crazy
is that she had a license for a
gun.
And but the unfortunately for their story, the
gun was at home. And you could prove
all this for yourself. This is just a
brief overview. And what's crazy about that is
the only way that makes sense to me
is that they did this. They opened fire
on a US citizen or I I forget
it.
Anyway, it to be honest, at this point,
it's irrelevant. It's a a person in this
country. I believe she was a US citizen.
And the point being that they fired on
her and said she had a gun because
I think they looked up her information and
saw a license and just went with the
story and then said semiautomatic
weapon
Because they then remember remember what the MAGA
media did? They went off about the terrorist
left, so their weapons are they made it
all up.
Less than a week later,
a federal grand jury indicted Martinez and her
passenger, 21 year old, Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz,
for assault and attempted murder of a federal
employee in the incident. They claimed she had
rammed the agent's SUV before opening fire. While
DHS claimed Martinez had a semiautomatic weapon, she
did not face any gun charges first. That
was the first hole, which is what we
saw with them claiming, but Maduro is a
drug trafficking. Oh, we just take that story
away now. We don't need it anymore.
I mean, it could just be that they
don't care, but I find that to be
incompetent.
But it's also just that they're just bull
rushing forward knowing they've got people that support
them no matter what.
Now Martinez plead not guilty. And it came
out in court
after all of that, after indicting her, going
this far, that the border patrol agent who
shot Martinez had been allowed to drive the
SUV back to Maine, more than a thousand
miles away,
despite being central evidence in the trial. Because
they need that was the claim that they
hit the car. So they drove the car
away because it didn't have any evidence of
being hit. Martinez's attorney sought a hearing to
determine whether federal authorities improperly destroyed evidence because
the car disappeared.
Sounds really honest, doesn't it? In in the,
the case against her by allowing the SUV
to be taken back to Maine. Then near
the November,
federal prosecutors
dropped all the charges against Martinez and Ruiz.
Why? You know why. The car the charges
were dismissed with prejudice, meaning prosecutors cannot refile
them in the future. Quote, these agents were
lying about what happened. Mister miss Martinez never
rammed anybody. And by the way, there's video
as we showed you at the time. These
agents hit miss Martinez, which we showed you.
They they ran into her, jumped out of
the car, bro tried to get her out
of the car, and then shot her. These
agents jumped out and shot miss Martinez, a
US citizen, that's what I thought, whose only
crime was warning her fellow community members that
ICE was in the neighborhood. She was an
observer. She didn't break any laws, but they
hated her for doing what they were doing
or she was doing. Now here's where it
gets even crazier before we continue. I think,
oh, that's the only one. There's only two
in this. I've got more.
This is the discussion about this. We just
saw them basically controlling each other and bait
kind of like elbow high fiving about shooting
and killing a US citizen just now.
This is what that guy said back on
May 6 after they shot the woman, lied
about her having a gun, lied about ramming
her, and then eventually dropped all the charges.
Five shots,
seven
holes. Border patrol supervisor appeared to brag about
shooting a woman, defense attorneys say. No. It's
cool. You could see the text messages. It's
not saying that. I fired five rounds and
she had seven holes. Put that in your
book, boys.
So he said,
These are the kind of people that are
driving the bus, guys.
They're bragging about this, even though they know
they lied about what happened.
That's despicable.
Here's another one. Case dropped against TikTok streamer
who was shot by US immigration
offic agents.
A federal judge has dismissed an indictment against
a Los Angeles TikTok streamer who was shot
by an officer during an immigration enforcement operation
and accused of assault against a federal agent,
citing constitutional violations.
Carlitos Ricardo Perez, a TikTok creator who streams
low, streams local breaking news, was accused in
October, guess what, guys? Ramming a car into
immigration agents' vehicles.
It's like you they could think of a
better lie. You'd think. Right? But I they
seem they probably know this works. One why
break what's working?
It after they surrounded him during an operation.
So they they they accuse the aim of
ramming into their cars if they surround him.
Right? But again, if they're not identifying themselves,
there's no warrants.
You don't know what's going on for you
could be being kidnapped for all you know.
And I'm not I mean, obviously, there's a
level of, like, okay. It's I I probably
can guess if it but why would you
assume that? Especially when it's not when it's
within your legal justification
to not comply without knowing what's going on.
That is the law.
And yet, they blame him for this. Now
it says body worn camera footage obtained by
Los Angeles Times shows an agent
fired his gun during the incident, shooting Perez
in the elbow. A ricochet bullet also hit
a deputy US marshal in the hand. Remember
that? We talked about this. This is you
guys, these are out of control. This was
all the way back in in December,
oh, wait.
Oh, I thought this was earlier. This is
12/29/2025.
But going on going forward, when they're discussing
this anyway,
it says, quote, the obstacles and roadblocks that
ICE has put in place at Adel Adelanto
make it difficult, if not impossible,
for the defendant to meet with his attorneys
and have caused defendant to suffer just from
a demonstrable prejudice
or a substantial threat thereof. So now what
they're saying is after all this went down
oh, sorry. I skipped the part.
It says,
Perrias was indicted by a grand jury just
like the last case,
was scheduled to go on trial.
But
few days later, US district judge Fernando old
Oguin ordered the indictment dismissed,
saying the government deprived him of his rights.
Now when you get into the reality of
the story, you'll break down, as we did
then, the how this went down, the the
unjust nature of them opening fire on him
for some reason, and then letting it go.
Now whether the judge decided to do it
for that reason or not, they just they
yet again dismissed the charges. Now it says,
basically, the judge is saying the obstacles that
they put in front of him, not allowing
him to have to see his lawyer. I
mean, to me, that's because you're trying to
stop justice. You don't want there to be
any kind of accountability.
I mean, it's obvious. And this is just
one of many examples, at least the ones
we can see. And it says he also
cited in his order the government's failure to
comply with various deadlines in the discovery process.
Seems like they know that, like, they're common
seems like a common thread.
Including its failure to release body worn camera
footage they captured by the deadline, which I
don't think they ever did. Why do you
think that is? The government has charged Perez
with assault, saying that he used his car
as a weapon to ram law enforcement vehicles,
which does not appear to be the reality.
But in video footage leading up to the
shooting reviewed by LA Times.
You ready? Perez's car did not appear to
be moving.
The footage shows him asking officers why he's
being detained
and an officer threatening to shoot him if
he doesn't get out. And then you know
what happens? They shoot him because he doesn't
get out. You see, this is the kind
of childish, petty, small action we're seeing from
all these people and then being backed up
by no one Trump and everybody else.
There's nothing. There's more. This is not even
the only examples, guys. That's incredible how many
things you can find like this.
This is the one that I've shown you
and talked about quite a lot. This is
back from August 2025. New video shows moments
before federal agent fire shots at man during
San Berni San Bernardino operation.
Now this one, I've talked about it plenty.
And I you can even see the video
right here.
Hey. Good. Good. So, essentially,
it's, it's sorry. It's kind of got Dramatic
scene. The weird camera this week. The weird
kind of fuzzed outside. I'm not sure why.
I think it's because it's a a phone
video, And they do that to make it
look broader. But it's really just that that
vertical. The point is the simple story. Let's
just kind of get to a quick shot.
So right here, so you got the they're
in the car, right? And you help me
remember this.
The sun is right there filming. He the
one he's the one who speaks English. The
other ones does not. Now that this is
the I don't believe
the story, if I remember correctly, was that
he did have some kind of immigration overlap.
That he like, he wasn't an illegal immigrant,
I don't think. But I remember there was
some kind of an issue. You can read
it. I forget if the exact situation. But
my point and the reason that's, not relevant
is the way that they handle this. So
they're there. They come up on them. And
if I remember correctly, I don't think it
was even justifiable to what they were doing.
It was sort of like he was, in
limbo of some kind of a meeting. Like,
most of it, by the way. People were
showing up for meetings
in accordance with what demand of them, and
then they arrest them on the way. It's
constant. But they come up to the car.
Nobody identifies themselves.
They say, get out of the car. I
see they seriously wait, like, ten seconds and
they bash this window in. Now, at that
point in time, like I've said, no one's
identified themselves. There is no warrant. Within the
law, they have the right to move. Now
they and they also didn't hit anybody, which
you can see in the video. They simply
drive forward,
and you can see from multiple angles the
guy didn't get hit. I went over this
extensively at the time. So to brush this
down quickly because we've talked about it many
times,
they open fire on the car.
There's family and a child in the car.
They open fire and fired multiple shots at
a car. Now this is different than the
other one. This is when they were driving
away.
Like they were there. They fired the back
of the car at, and the side as
they were driving away.
K. So then the guy drives home. And
guess what he does? He calls the police.
Because that's what you do when you're running
from a crime. Right? He calls the police.
He reports what happens.
Then they come up later and surround his
house with with all sorts of high level
DOJ. Like, all sorts of, state department. Was
it was the state department?
What was that? Anyway, just people above ice.
There was a lot there was another agency
involved. I'm trying to remember this off the
top of my head. So they surround the
cows,
ultimately
leave and don't arrest him
because they claim it was a sanctuary city.
That's what they said. In no way does
that stop you from arresting somebody in their
house when you claim they actually hit a
cop
because they didn't do that.
And this is the they they opened fire
on the family under that guy's saying they
tried to hit the cop. They lied. Now,
I remember the story. They then came back
later, arrested and charged this guy for something
random about running from police or something, and
they got it to stick. That's just punitive.
You broke the law in every way with
what you were doing. On top of that,
you opened fire on a family because you
were angry about it, then lied about it,
lied about being hit, and then just went
back and charged. I mean, this is the
unaccountable reality of where we are. And this
is happening to US citizens. It's happening to
immigrants here legally. It's happening to every walk
of life right now. Now here are some
other examples just to include them.
Melanie points out without due process, they can
just claim with no proof that you're an
undocumented immigrant, would then detain, incarcerate, and deport
you.
Without due process, you're guilty with no chance
of proving your innocence. This is what came
up in the beginning of this.
Even if you're an illegal immigrant, you get
you still have a process through which, like,
everybody who is in this country has constitutional
rights
to be to have to have the evidence
presented for the claim. Especially like we said,
and anybody honest was pointing out that you
could you could be an American citizen without
any identification who just happens to look like
you're not, and then get deported because they
accuse you of that without proving it. Couldn't
that happen if you're not requiring it? Of
course, it could. In fact, it gets abused
like we already saw.
But this is, ICE brutally tackles volunteer to
the ground, 73 year old US citizen. He
says, folks, we're just waiting for the bus.
Agents didn't even ask for his papers. They
just detained him. And it's a US citizen.
74 years old. They threw him to the
ground, arrested him, took him away, and eventually
let him go because he was a US
citizen. That is exactly the point. Why would
anybody be okay with that?
Most aren't. Just people lie about it. Here,
this one's actually pretty crazy more than most.
These guys were on a cruise ship. I'll
just I'll play the clip for you.
They raid the ship. They raid the little
cabin they're in. The wife is naked. They
try to steal her phone.
The guy's a US citizen. He's a veteran
of the coast guard.
If you can't see by now where this
is already at and let alone where it's
going, I don't think you want to. And
frankly, like I said, I think most people
are honest in this conversation and most people
are outraged about this. Many of which are
probably trying to be quiet about it because
they're unhappy, because they feel like they were
double crossed, because it feel like it makes
them look stupid.
That's I get it. But it's not in
your interest to hide from this. The reality
is it's coming. It's here. It's happening to
Republicans. It's happening to American citizens. It's happening
to veterans. It's happening to liberals. It's happening
to everybody
as always.
Last day of a nine day carnival cruise
with friends and family. We were both dead
asleep. When they say ICE agents
stormed into their room. Then we got this
pounding of the door. Yeah. It burst open.
Three men came in with flashlights in their
faces yelling commands,
ordering me out of bed, and put me
against the wall and handcuffed me. They had
called a female agent because they realized I
wasn't dressed. And so she came in the
room, and she saw me filming, and she
jumped on top of me to try and
get my phone.
And I pushed her off once, and she
jumped again and snatched it from my hand.
Martinez, who's a US citizen and coast guard
veteran, was taken from his wife and put
in a holding cell in an unknown location
off the boat. I mean, thankfully, it was
early, so I don't think a ton of
people saw me, but, you know, it was
just It was still Yeah. Humiliating. I mean,
he's he doesn't have a criminal record. He's
never been arrested. He's never had handcuffs on.
Little Okay. So explain this then. Why in
the world would this happen? Oopsie. We made
a mistake. Okay. Even if that's the truth,
doesn't that make the point?
Oopsie. We didn't realize. Now you're in El
Salvador.
Yeah. Exactly why there's supposed to be a
process. Exactly why you're supposed to identify yourself
and present a warrant and go through they're
not.
Anybody saying otherwise, including Noam and and McLaughlin
who have blatantly lied repeatedly about not deporting
and arresting US citizens, they have repeatedly.
Was shared until finally This was all based
off of just my first and last name.
And they said that they thought this was,
someone who had warrants for drug trafficking.
After almost two hours They took my fingerprints
to help verify my identity,
took my photo. It was realized they had
the wrong guy and brought Martinez
back to the boat. No apology. No. We're
so sorry for the mistaken identity. You see,
that's the biggest one not big. One of
the frustrating issues, they're just petty, angry people.
Like, why wouldn't you be like, I am
sorry, man. Like, we thought we were doing
the right thing. No. They don't even think
they're doing the right thing. They're doing what
they hate. Or rather, attacking what they hate.
It's it's driven by ideology, by hatred, by
by the wrong motivation, at least in my
what I can see playing out. Because why
wouldn't you if he's a US citizen, aren't
you supposed to be fighting for US citizens?
No. I I don't who knows? Maybe there's
hate him because he doesn't look like them.
That seems to be a factor today.
It should it should anger everybody who believes
in what we're fighting for. You know, what
you claim anyway, the constitution, liberty, freedom.
No. You know,
at one point, I remember hearing one of
the agents saying that they didn't
feel good about the way everything happened
and that they I believe that's because there
are people within this that aren't monsters that
the leaders driving it are.
And maybe that and I think this is
why they go to the lowest common denominator
because people who care about what they're actually
doing are the ones that don't tow the
line, and they get kicked aside in politics,
in enforcement, everywhere.
Kinda knew beforehand
that this was gonna be a a a
name mismatch, kind of mistaken identity,
but they still proceeded to Still were through.
Us. Yeah. Now as they reflect I didn't
necessarily think I wouldn't see him again, but
it was just I didn't know what he
was going through. They're overcome with emotion. And
this You should worry about that today. That's
not an illegitimate concern, guys. It's happened to
people, including American citizens. This is happening to
people every day, and it's unfair that it's
happening in this country at all.
So Yeah. This is not The USA of
ten years ago. You know? It's a different
country.
Yeah. Not the country I serve for. And
anger.
Yeah. Well, I mean, you could I to
a degree. Yeah. But if we're gonna be
honest with ourselves, it kinda is, though. It's
just it's just been less bombastic. It's been
more behind the scenes. It's been more subtle.
It's been to a less degree.
But it is happening. I mean, you can
go back to Biden's administration. You go back
to Bush and Obama, and you can very
clearly watch, you know, the droning campaigns or
the, you know, or or exam or the
killing a US citizen.
Right? In Yemen. Right? We talked about this
this. There are examples here. What's happening now,
I argue, is just the culmination of where
it was always going. So I do agree.
It is more crazy right now, and that
is, I think, in some ways, actually because
of Trump's personality. But it's not unique to
Trump, but it's not unique to Republicans, and
I think it's very clearly in all of
US government agenda.
Over why this happened in the first place.
He has TSA pre check. He's had a
FBI background check because he has his concealed
carry. He's a military veteran. They had his
passport. They could have figured all this out
without ever even speaking to us. Yep. They
could have vetted my information
and use that
rather than this,
you know, rating our room the way they
did. Carnival Cruise Line tells us they're aware
that US Customs and Border Protection
took a guest into custody, but wouldn't go
into further detail.
ICE has yet to respond to a request
for comment. You can find more on our
website at 12news.com.
In Phoenix, j Cunningham 12 Wild.
Here's the article where I discussed that
DHS lies about detaining, deporting US citizens.
And, hey. Look at that. Trump reportedly ready
to attack Venezuela. Look at that. 10/31/2025.
Watch pay attention to T Lab and
you're ahead of the curve.
So here is the article if you wanna
check it out. It's just the same conversation,
but just from an article from corporate and
corporate media.
Here's another example of just a larger point.
No. It's funny. You can't see the title.
That's stupid.
Oh, that's why
That's weird
They just pop up all of a sudden
So it says, 2025
was ISIS dead ISIS deadliest year in two
decades
Here are the thirty two people
who died in custody.
Custody.
What while in their care, guys. I mean,
so we're not even we could talk about
the larger conversation. It goes way beyond that.
We're talking about 32 people who you've taken
custody of, who die in your care just
in 2025.
That also sounds like any number of despotic,
horrible places we've that are
I mean, I don't know how you frame
it today. That are you know, it's it's
where we're going, guys. It's where we already
are. It's what those places are largely like
that because of these groups. We need to
start being honest about this. Now just to
wrap up in this in general,
Minnesota state officials said the FBI is now
solely leading the investigation into the deadly eye
shooting after they were denied access to the
case materials.
Great. So now you got local people who
might have an interest in actually hold doing
the right thing, who are being boxed out
by the cash FBI who clearly cares about
doing the right thing, guys. Right? How are
the Epstein files going? I mean, this group
has
this will go down in history because of
him as one of the most ridiculous FBI
administrations I've ever seen in my life. Repeatedly
being caught for I mean, who knows why?
Whether he's, you know I mean, I I'm
not gonna who do theorizing is important in
some cases, but you could argue it's because
of him alone or because the entire institution
is a completely corrupt thing. The idea that
you're boxing out authorities is never the way
this goes. The reason this makes sense to
me is because the FBI, led by Trump's
administration, is trying to control the way this
goes down because it's a huge story that
is already blowing up in their face,
and they're gonna manage it.
Here's the one followed up after that. Minnesota
investigators say they can't access evidence
after fatal ICE shooting, and FBI won't work
jointly on the probe. Actually, I think I
got those mixed up. The second one was
that they're taking complete control of it. So
first, they were going, why can't we access
the information?
Why why aren't you letting us in? And
then the FBI says, we're taking complete control
of it.
Now JD Vance, of course, says the ICE
agent has absolute immunity.
Oh, yeah? Because that's logical. Right? That makes
total sense. He can go out there and
rape women and shoot people in the face,
and, ah, he gives immunity because we're in
charge. This is insane.
There's no world in which anybody should go,
Yeah, that makes sense.
They're the absolute last people who should have
immunity because they're upholding the law. They should
be held to a higher standard. Same reason
politicians should not be immune from responsibility.
Especially when you just murdered somebody in plain
in broad daylight
because they were driving away.
Now Matt McDermott points out, a reminder, it's
recently reported that ICE slashed off the training
from five months to forty seven days, he
says, to flatter Trump's ego with forty seven
president. But, guys, five months is ridiculous. Forty
seven days, that's largely, I think, in part
why you're getting this, probably because they wanted
that.
Recruits showed up without full vetting, with criminal
records, failed drug tests, not meeting basic standards,
but, yeah, go ahead. It's not a joke,
guys. You can look this up for yourself.
On top of the fact that now going
forward,
ICE officials plan to spend a $100,000,000
in one year to recruit gun rights supporters
and military enthusiasts
through online
through online influencers and a geotargeted
advertising campaign according to their own documents.
Great. I'm sure we're gonna get the best
of the best from the mindless partisan followers
that end up wanting to hate Democrats because
you tell them to. Good times.
Now, here is the scary part. On top
of all of it, here's what Vance just
casually laid out for you.
Done is actually getting two and a half
million illegal aliens out without any of the
really big marquee things that we've been working
on. That was just simple willpower.
Oh, great. So you haven't seen anything yet
so far?
And the president of The United States coming
in and saying this is done. I think
we're to see those deportation numbers ramp up
as we get more and more people
online,
working for ICE, going door to door and
making sure that if you're an illegal alien,
you've gotta get out of this country. And
if you wanna come back, apply to the
proper channel. Oh, yeah. But then get deported
again because you're not legal yet, which is
what they've done. People literally going through the
right channels, getting deported on their way to
meetings.
As a hypocrite, or he's too stupid to
know that's happening. But
door to door, he says.
Yep.
Because that lines up with what we always
talk about. Right? ICE or any authority agents
going door to door to check and make
sure you're the right kind of person.
Right in line with American values. Right, guys?
Disturbing remarks. JD casually suggest ICE will go
door to door, openly flirting with trampoline the
fourth amendment.
He he these are not beating those Nazi
allegations.
Here's US Department of Labor on January 6.
We are going to win
America first. And I agree with met Marcus,
Dilsen says, win it what? I don't even
know what you're playing here. Win? Like, what
are you talking about? Like, so this is
what I I think what we're talking about,
quite honestly,
is stuff like this. Think about this overlapping
point. This is from December 31.
It says, the peace of the nation no
longer besieged by the third world.
America after a 100,000,000 deportations.
Oh, this is fun. I didn't see this.
This post uses, Hiroshi's,
Nagi's artwork without permission.
They guys, they've been caught doing this repeatedly.
The White House, Homeland Security, or, like, they
just used the, the mister clean logo. I
doubt they paid for that. They just don't
care. Because they're powerful. Might makes right. Oh,
excuse me. Peace through strength. I said it
wrong. I mean, guys, that's what they're doing.
And that's a small example, but they just
don't care. Whether Trump will sue them, it
just doesn't even matter. But so, he himself
has posted that these illustrations are being used
that as authorization.
Yeah. It's just small example, but they don't
there's nothing that they guide the guys the
law doesn't matter. Nothing applies to them. They're
powerful, so shut up. Now the point, America
after a 100,000,000 deportations. Well, Aaron points out,
this in the this the entire US foreign
born population
is only 45,000,000 people.
So either they're that stupid or they're insinuating
that a hell of a lot of Americans
are gonna be deported. He says, so this
is so this rid ridiculous edgelord post by
taxpayer funded trolls is suggesting deporting 55,000,000
native born citizens. Well, how many times have
we seen Trump tell you that citizens might
be next?
It's not a joke.
This, is about the I mean, this is
interesting for many reasons. The Joneses of the
world have talked about FEMA camps and all
sides towards it for the longest time. Well,
guess what? They're building, and as this person
frames it, a concentration camp industry in The
United States, and are deporting and selling captives
to be tortured in prisons and labor camps.
The US government is industrializing
a global slave trade again.
New ICE facility being planned for Jupiter, Florida,
part of a plan to hold 80,000 immigrants
in warehouses.
And what you'll find is those are popping
up all over the country.
But it's okay though, because they're Trump's FEMA
camps or whatever you wanna call it. I'm
just making a point.
You know, it's like North American Union, but
that's good now because Trump and yay and
totally not globalism. You know, disgustingly hypocritical and
we should call it out. But worthy of
note, and I think what's happening here is
the same agenda, as always.
And
you being in these crosshairs, because they have
to be. Well, as,
Darik Tennis points out,
Elon
Musk spent as he posts this today, but
this goes over the last couple of days.
He spent several hours last night amplifying
every post he could find justifying the murder
of an innocent woman by Trump Gestapo. Now,
whatever you think about the framing,
he does this.
And you can prove they're wrong about what
they're saying. But he's out there going, Yes.
100%. Thumbs up to every single thing, no
matter how illogical, without any evidence that simply
says what he agrees with.
That's I mean, this is why there's difference
between, you know, this is not sent what
you're this is this is like the what's
a good example? I mean, he's the one
behind the scenes dictating and controlling this platform.
So it's quite a bit different when he's
back there illegitimately putting up things that he
says and what he thinks. This is about
controlling the narrative. When he wakes up today
expect him to get back to telling Europeans
to rise up against their oppressive tyrannical governments.
Right.
God is such a cartoon man, it's just
so crazy.
Now, lastly, I just wanted to point this
out. Who knows if we're going anywhere? I'm
not even familiar with Robin Kelly here. But
she says I'll be filing articles of impeachment
against Kristi Noem.
Good.
I think she's illegitimate. So too was a
lot of other people. You can go back
to Biden's administration and Blinken and Plumbing. Same
thing. In this case, though, we're here now.
This is a crime, and they deserve to
be called out for it. So does Trump.
They're what they're doing is wrong. So we'll
see what happens. She's simply making about just
ICE and the rogue force filing the constitution,
which is true.
But it's not just Kristi Noem. I mean,
she's just following orders, guys. But start somewhere.
And lastly,
Trump invoking
Insurrection Act
Speculation
grows after ICE shooting.
Now, it's just speculation.
But let's think this through what's already happened.
Right? With where we were, where we've been,
the idea of Trump already floating,
already floating
the idea
of insurrection for numerous things. Or the act.
Excuse me. I mean, it started with the
idea of Venezuela, and and which, by the
way, was so shockingly flimsy. But he pushed
it. And so now we're at a point
where we have another surge of things like
this, and
him declaring this would fit every single agenda
he's trying to accomplish. But, you know, maybe
he sees that we all see it. It's
hard to say. But I just thinking about
where that goes. And using things like this
to bull rush us into another agenda with
another false reasoning,
it makes sense.
So it's why we need to be on
guard, be questioning, calling these things out.
I think I wanna end with
the clip of Trump.
It's not popping up. Oh, here we go.
Hold on.
There we go.
And Trump is deporting US citizens. Because I
think it's really alarming that we can have
that laid out the way it is. Have
them focusing, I'm attacking. I mean, it just
even just the idea of the deportation numbers.
Whether that's an accident or not, you know,
the idea that they floated this should be
concerning to all of us. And as they're
violating rights of everybody, as they're now as
we just saw a US citizen executed in
broad daylight, maybe we should consider that there
might be something behind this. But the very
least,
question them. I mean, that should be your
immediate go to whether left or right or
aware that it's all a lie. Question them.
Question me. Question the people. But that doesn't
mean ignore. Question quite literally means interrogate, in
in investigate,
consider,
and question
consider all things question everything
absolute all the time guys it just has
to be the way to go so thank
you for tuning in today guys I appreciate
your support we need it plenty plenty going
on right now and we have plenty more
coming your way as we said with the
fundraiser on the sixteenth we're gonna be doing.
I've got, I believe, a couple of articles
coming from Derek that'll come out over the
next couple of days, possibly tomorrow. And more
things on the horizon in general, as well
as me continuing to do my best on
this work with all the stuff going on.
But I couldn't do it without you. When
I say that though, I was just thinking
about this earlier. Like, I legitimately
mean that.
Sure. I could be talking about stuff I
could be doing, but do you think this
platform would exist without all of you? It
wouldn't. It wouldn't be here. This would not
be a platform without all of you continuing
to support me or doing it from the
very beginning.
How else do I I could not do
this without you.
You are the last American vagabond. So thank
you for being here. I love you all.
As always, question everything. Come to your own
conclusions.
Stay vigilant. I'm sure that you're open to
deporting,
individuals that aren't foreign aliens but are criminals
to El Salvador. Does that in does that
include potentially US citizens fully naturalized in Ukraine?
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happened
to be 90 years old, and
if,
if they rape
87 year old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn
yeah. Yeah. That includes and what do you
think there's special category of person? You said
this morning twenty years in jail, and then
maybe they'll go to one of these prisons
in El Salvador. Do you think with the
way that the judges have been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists
to a jail in El Salvador than these
MS thirteen or Trendeira guys. Well, I view
these people as terrorists just like,
others. Could we use it for
violent criminals, our own violent criminals? I call
them homegrown criminals. Yes. I mean, the homegrown
The homegrowns could be. That grew up and
something went wrong and they hit people over
the head with a baseball bat.
We have, and push people into subways
just before the train gets there like you
see happening sometimes.
We are looking into it, and we wanna
do it. I I would love to do
that. Fortunately, I'd like to say, you know,
a little controversial, but I couldn't care less.
We have a lot of bad criminals that
came into the,
into the this country, and they came in
stupidly. It was an unforced error. It was
a incompetent president that allowed it to happen.
It was an auto pen maybe that allowed
it to happen, and it did happen. But
we also have a lot of bad people
that have been here for a long time.
People that whack people over the head with
a baseball bat from behind when they're not
looking and kill them. People that,
knife you when you're walking down the street.
They're not they're not new to our country.
They're old to our country. Many of them
were born in our country. I think we
ought to get them the hell out of
here too. You wanna know the truth. So
maybe that'll be the next job that we'll
work on together. In some respects, it's just
as bad now, the authoritarianism,
that is coming, Gerald. I am really, really
fearful for the president of The United States
Of America to suggest as he did on
Air Force One on Sunday night,
that American citizens could be deported
For his press secretary to say, we're looking
into,
a way to see if this is legal.
We don't know if it's legal or not.
A is terrifying.
B betrays such a profound ignorance of first
principles to which he is sworn. He is
sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution
and to enforce,
federal law. You mentioned that you're open to
deporting,
individuals that aren't foreign aliens, but are criminals
to El Salvador. Does that in does that
include potentially US citizens fully naturalized in Ukraine?
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happened
to be 90 years old, and
if,
if they rape
87 year old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn,
yeah. Yeah. That includes them. What? Do you
think there's special category of person? They're as
bad as anybody that comes in? We have
bad ones too. Profoundly un American, utterly unconstitutional,
and I'm sorry to say
is coming.