It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 11/14/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Well, you know, it's one of those days,
one of those weeks, months, years where,
you know, the you you're I I'm I
want to come out and and address the
things that we were correct about. You know?
And I and and that we're going to
point at things as we always do about
stuff that we've been you know, our track
record of being consistently correct about pretty large
I mean, you know, not to pull my
shoulder, pat myself on the back, but, you
know, you go back to our track record
as I pointed out many times. Myself, Whitney,
Derek, you know, the daily wrap up by
itself, the TLAB team.
I mean, it's I'm very, very, very proud
of the consistent work we've done. You go
I mean, as far back as you wanna
look, going back to the canna cannabis topic
and how consistently correct I've been even back
when that was very contentious or the conversation
around and, I mean, not just this our
platform and everybody that writes here and, you
know, and and the
COVID nineteen conversation
or the war on terror, foreign policy in
most cases in a general sense about what
where we were going, not knowing every single
detail. But, you know, how about
East Palestine,
Lahaina? You know, any of these conversations. I
think it's important to recognize
the
measured objective nonpartisan coverage, waiting for facts, and
giving you our best outlook on what we
think is coming and how consistently that turns
out to be the correct
where it ends up. Now so today with
you know, as we've already kind of been
touching on, the the Epstein topic, the two
party illusion, support for Donald Trump, I've never
in my life seen this more vulnerable. And
I just said that, like, a few weeks
ago. And today, even more than I've ever
seen in my entire career doing this, I've
never seen more people with whether they even,
I mean, as I see it, whether they
even realize that what they're looking at or
what they're
uncomfortable about is the two party illusion kind
of all breaking down. Like, I I think
some people
are calling some of these things out, but
don't really
haven't contextualized
what exactly it is that they're seeing. As
opposed to just we're being lied to by
the team, this is a much larger topic.
The way that the left is responding to
some of these cover ups, these lies, almost
in and of itself show you that there's
more to the story than just one side
fighting the other. Right? That's that's the largest
part of this Epstein point is that right
now you can clearly see
both sides I mean, as I see it,
both sides are playing this game. I don't
think either of them want it really to
come out, save for maybe a few of
them, and ultimately are able to play their
selective releases and use it against each other
in hopes that both of them sort of,
I don't know, come to an agreement to
not allow any of it to come out
under some different guise of change. I don't
know.
But the point is that we are watching
this completely breakdown. And the Epstein conversation, as
I said, is very much exposing not just
the two party illusion,
but in particular,
the the people who have kind of tried
to coop that awareness before we got here.
What's the fake patriots, the fake MAGA movement?
And that's not necessarily
only Republicans versus the other side. It's just
the
manipulators
who are using the current momentum to try
to change your opinion. If it was the
Democrats in power, it'd have been something else,
but I argue with the same kind of
outcome in mind. But we're gonna talk about
where that is today with the Epstein files.
It's very, very revealing. It's interesting, and Donald
Trump's administration is kinda spinning out right now.
And we're gonna go through the different you
know, the the
emergency meetings and the the kind of pressure
against congress congressmen
men and women in congress, the messy element
of it, what Johnson's currently doing, and kinda
where it stands right now. But I think
it's pretty clear that this is not working
in Trump's favor As now, yet again, it's
a hoax and more information. I mean, as
Derek writes, and I'll show you in a
minute, it's just there's just no pretending as
he wrote the that there's no there there,
which I I hate that, but it's a,
you know, a nod to political points from
the past.
But it's obvious there's something there. It's objectively
clear. Even with his responses to things, it
shows you that there's more to the story,
but the facts themselves are pretty undeniable. And
this is coming out with new emails, whether
selectively shown or not, from Epstein pointing out
that Trump knew about the girls or that
he you know, we'll get into all of
this, and it's very, very revealing.
But I guess more so to people that
really didn't wanna see that it was there.
And how that overlaps with Israel, I think,
is in a very important point as well
as usual, but we'll talk about the updates
on the FBI investigation around the Halloween terror
attack and just kind of a general point
about that.
A seemingly
anything, rather nothing going anywhere,
any of these stories, whether it's the Dallas
shooting. I mean, what we keep seeing is
a lot of hype and momentum and movement
and documents being thrown around, and then there's
just nothing happens.
And I'm gonna get back into this point
yet again about what seems to be the
one person.
There's we'll get into the one individual in
all this that has not been named, that
was not held, who was released, no charges.
Yeah. And and this seems to be the
one person who was involved with the largest
action, yet the other people are being charged.
I feel like just like with Dallas and
other situations, just like the FBI always has,
we're watching them sort of manufacture events with
people they're either involved with or somebody else,
maybe another foreign intelligence apparatus, is also involved
with.
But we'll talk about how that overlaps today
with Maha and a point about
the the coming control grid.
And all of this in general today is
as as you'll see kind of overlapping with
the illusion of the two party part paradigm,
the awareness around the many different lies. One
of the main things we're gonna get into
right out of the gate is something I
found really important
that is, again, sort of with that point
I just made,
calling out the contradictions
where peep like, we'll point to somebody saying,
we gotta stop BlackRock and all these people
from stealing all the land inside this country.
Sure. I agree. Except for the fact that
BlackRock and Larry Fink are literally, you know,
holding hands with Trump's administration. But But at
the same time, as we'll talk about early,
there's a major Israeli company pretending to be
an American company that is scooping up real
estate all over the country, but they don't
care about that.
Interesting to see where that goes. All coming
together to show you this sort of technocratic
future that they're driving you into. But
but I guess being double crossed is the
best way to frame it. From Donald Trump,
from what he's currently doing to people he
supports, and the finally, the awareness reaching people
who are large enough to make it clear
that nobody buys it anymore. His lies have
been adding up to an extreme degree. And
what we're really starting to see with all
of that is the line where you have
people, a huge apparatus of very influential people
who are willing to lie about anything,
even if it's in your face, even if
it's obvious, Epstein who?
And then literally everybody else. And there's, you
know, varying degrees of awareness within that. But,
I mean,
you just don't look at this like a
stargate or anything else from day one and
don't and pretend that we all just don't
see it.
But let's start with
a point about Cash Patel, the FBI, and
Venezuela that I just wanted to include that
I think is very interesting. Now this is,
again, from one of these many characters, Eric
Dougherty, who will just come out and support
and share and yell out, but whatever they
point to. Now this is kind of a
this clip itself is Cash
clearly out of his depth, and that's just
you can see the way he's he's reading
every other word. He's he's uncomfortable. I think
this guy is in a very dangerous spot.
Knowing that he will be one of the
earliest to be thrown under the bus should
things go awry, I think we sense that.
Him or Bondi seem to do the obvious
ones. You know, it's funny statements like that.
I always get the eye rolls from the
adult you know, the insider big you know,
people that look at us like we're smaller
in the room, but ultimately those things end
up happening and they later point to it.
You know, the point is that things like
this happen every single day within politics.
Yet when you discuss it before we get
there, sort of somebody being surreptitiously
manipulated,
you know, the CNN, Fox News types will
look at that like that's just so
conspiracy theory, which is people who've been following
this show or any others have come to
realize that those things are more often than
not the way these things go. Not that
we should assume that. But my point in
this is that Cash Patel's
I I get the sense he's aware that
he's on the chopping blocks. Put it that
way. And what he's doing here is trying
to back up Trump's initiative,
except two things contradicting
the the Venezuela overlap with fentanyl, but also
just insanely arguing that after apparently bombing a
few boats in the ocean, which don't have
any real connection to to fentanyl in the
in the real sense, and then some discussions
with China, that he has shut down the
pipeline of fentanyl in the world, or at
least to The United
States. Again, these are statements like Tom Homan
saying a thousand percent increase in attacks. It's
not true. Flat period. End of conversation. Look
it up for yourself. I've already done a
shell on it. It's not true. The only
thing that comes from is what they say.
And even then, what they're pointing to are
a bunch of random events of them engaging
with protesters,
and they're lying to you about winning a
seven to zero Supreme Court ruling that Stephen
Miller pointed out. Or, Bondy is under heat
right now for literally po
backdating content to make it look like she
was ahead of something, and it's she they're
lying to you. And every which way, these
people are trying to deceive you. Nothing new,
by the way. But this is about them
trying to state that we've somehow altered the
entire war on drugs dynamic because of the
things they said, which I don't even think
are true, but we'll play this first. We'll
talk about it. At a level never seen
before,
while at Ministry of Public Security headquarters,
I met with my counterpart at MPS
where the Chinese government agreed
on a plan to stop fentanyl precursor. Yeah.
I just have to comment. Like, you know
how I make fun of the media, you
know, where they have that sort of, like,
you know, where you know, the the kind
of like the mantra Steve and I make
fun of
where it's like the
you know, like, they always have that, like,
training way they're supposed to deliver the words
and, you know, has some kind of impact.
I get the sense that that's what he's,
like he's you know, the way he's trying
to deliver this is to make instead of
just reading it out and giving the details,
it's like you're trying to make it. I
that's somebody who's insecure in his position. Completely
my opinion. But also that he's reading back
and forth every other word. It just seems
like it's a small point. But I very
much sense that. And, you know, my senses
have tend to be correct in the future.
I guess we'll find out. The Chinese government
agreed
on a plan to stop
fentanyl precursors.
What does that mean? The People's Republic Of
China has fully designated and listed all 13
precursors
utilized to make fentanyl.
Furthermore, they have agreed to control seven chemical
subsidiaries
that are also utilized to produce this lethal
drug.
The lethal drug that we are stopping. Yeah.
Okay. So China said things.
Is that worthy of this massive
declaration that you've ended the the fentanyl distribution
in the world even though you just told
us it was Venezuela?
What so we're trusting China's word on what
they're gonna do now? It's just a weird
statement. You can come out and say that
China agreed to these things. We'll have to
hope that this comes to pass, not we
did it. It's over. The war on drugs
is finished. The week, you know, we the
what is it? Mission accomplished banner behind him
just like George Bush. Like, it just feels
pretty they're desperate for a win is the
point I'm getting to, quite obviously. Effective immediately,
essentially,
president Trump Effective immediately, essentially. Has shut off
the pipeline that creates fentanyl that kills tens
of thousands of Americans.
The pipeline that kills tens of I mean,
I'm I'm I'm I'm overdoing it, but am
I crazy? It's just weird. Right? Just just
tell us what's going on. He's trying to
make it so important. But the Donald Trump
spoke to them and they said some things.
You know, this is not really I mean,
do we really believe that China's gonna stop
doing whatever it wants to do? I mean,
or or alternatively, are we gonna ignore that
you guys keep telling us China's the biggest
evil villain in the world when you want
that to be the case? It just seems
odd. He's And and, obviously, if you get
my point, I don't think that it's actually
what's going on. Instances are now banned, and
they will no longer be utilized by the
Mexican drug trafficking organizations or any other DTOs
around the world to make this drug. Right.
Because the criminals are gonna abide by your
rulings.
Right.
No more will they be allowed to use
this thing. That's like thinking that gun laws
will somehow stop criminals from using guns. This
historic achievement has saved tens of thousands of
lives.
Oh, the achievement that just happened that hasn't
even come into effect yet. This achievement that
we're announcing that isn't actually has now saved
all these lives because of some you get
I mean, I this is ridiculous to me.
Anybody who's even remotely discerning is gonna go,
okay. Well, you're obviously just blowing this out
of proportion to make it seem like something's
going on. And maybe maybe maybe over the
next month, year, couple of year, maybe we'll
see something change. But the way they're announcing
this is pretty insulting. This historic achievement would
not have been possible without the tremendous team
of president
Trump, the attorney general, the The team of
president Trump.
Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
and ambassador Purdue in China.
Okay. Okay. Well,
that's leading to another point, of course. The
the first and obvious one being that I
think that's insanely embarrassing the way that they're
presenting this as if anything has actually happened
other than just having a conversation with China
and not like they haven't you know, there's
been plenty of conversations that have been had
with China that don't really end up being
what they tell you or that Trump says,
blah blah blah. But as Read Media points
out, but I thought it was coming from
Venezuela. As Eric writes, breaking an enormous victory,
as always. Right? You know, it's embarrassing that
you're gonna have a government entity come out
and say, this just happened. And without even
anything more than Kash Patel, who's been caught
lying 55 times in the last twenty minutes,
is gonna come out and say, the thing,
we won. We won because Kash said.
Always people like this, you can't really take
seriously. If they're not gonna be discerning and
question what's being delivered to them by the
government, then why would you ever take them
on what they're saying at face value? Consider
it like anybody else, but just recognize these
people will be blindly taking whatever the government
tells them when they feel that's on their
side. And it just goes on to say
effective immediately. Look. Just wow. This is massive.
It can't be talked about enough. It's perfect.
Perfect.
Now here's the funny part about this. President
Trump has ordered action, and the Department of
War is delivering.
Today, I'm announcing operation Southern Spear. Here, you
know, another war for the peace president. Nothing
new there. Led by task force Southern Spear
in SOUTHCOM.
This mission defends our homeland, removes narcoterrorists from
the hemisphere, and secures our homeland from drugs
that are killing our people. The Western Hemisphere
is America's neighborhood, and we will protect it.
Okay. So, you know, the the globalism mindset,
which is what this would be regardless of
the game of pretending like they're doing it
to make it only about America. You are
whether even if your argument is this is
about protecting only America, if your mindset is
we have to do around the world to
do so, then you're a globalist. Okay? And
the game we're like what Trump just said
or the rest of them. I have to
look at it from a global perspective as
the president. Be well, yes. I don't agree
with that. That's exactly the opposite of what
this country was founded upon, but the point
is that's globalism in one part. The mindset
that this is we need to have one
global
view of how the world should work or
one global enforcement, a global rule
infrastructure,
global government. This is quite literally what is
continuing to grow, and as always, the people
that were the most vocal about this over
the years are now the ones doing anything
but call this out. But, overall, that's not
the point here, just to highlight the fact
that this is them building another war on
drugs, war on terror mashed together. It's nothing
new, guys. It's the same old thing. And
and here's,
he said the news saying, Perdeky is the
globalist in Washington have led our country into
one disastrous foreign war after another. See, some
people have the integrity and the principles enough
to be able to call this what
it is. But southern spear. So one, that's
more war. But, of course, you can pretend
that because congress doesn't authorize it, therefore, it's
not a war, even though that makes it
illegal in the first place,
it's still war, and it's still not a
peace president. But here's the craziest part of
all of it. This was from two days
ago. Quote, few people are able to achieve
this kind of privilege. Drug smuggler granted clemency
by Trump headed back to prison for allegedly
attacking nurse with IV pole, assaulting live live
in nanny. Okay. Here's this. We're attacking war
on drugs. We're pretending we're going after this.
We're making deals with China, but then here's
a drug smuggler. You can go free.
It's just silly. The point, of course, if
you get it, is that it's not ever
really about the things they say it is.
If you think they care about drugs, I
don't think you're paying attention. It's about the
things they can use. It's like pretending they
cared about woke pronouns and blah blah blah
as opposed to just using those terms and
those ideas and the ideology to get its
foot in the door around the world to
places that were at that point. It's pretty
obvious if you understand it.
Now, overall,
I think we all recognize this is happening.
I just did a show recently,
the USA Today article, a prominent conservative saying
I feel swindled.
I might even have that,
just probably gone now, but I've I've got
the few I had the few clips from
Candace Owens.
Again, that's not to say that I'm saying
because Candace says it, therefore, you know, we
trust Candace. It's I don't you shouldn't be
trusting me, guys. You should be taking everything
with a grain of salt and checking it
for yourself. That way you don't have to
trust Candace or Ryan. You can look to
the source material and confirm the claims for
yourself. I do have this right here. This
is just to point out that e Candace
Owens with one of the most, if not
the most, influential podcast in the world is
saying this, in case you didn't see this.
Done with Donald Trump, or could you see
a way that you would end up perhaps
voting for him? Oh, you can't run again,
obviously, but would you support him publicly again?
So I wanna be clear. I don't regret
voting for Donald Trump above Kamala. I think
he was the better candidate. How about Certainly
a better candidate above, Joe Biden. But what
I will say is that he's been a
chronic disappointment, and, I feel embarrassed that I
told people to go vote for him because
this wasn't going to happen and it is
happening.
Yeah. So he lied or he promised the
world and couldn't deliver, however you wanna read
it. And I still find that such a
cop out to then argue that you still
would have voted for you know, so the
unknown
or just what you believe you know about
Kamala is somehow now
worse than him complete I mean, this is
what's so funny about that. So so we're
we're to believe that Trump went back on
his word. Right? So the opposite of what
was promised. And so the opposite of what
was promised is still better than what Kamala
was doing, which would have been what?
A third direction that's not as bad, worse?
It just doesn't make sense logically. The point
is they they have to go, I still
don't want Kamala. I still wanna stay with
Trump, but he's a liar, and he's working
with Bill Gates and black okay. So then
they're all the same thing. Let's just get
past this childish need to kind of, you
know well, you could put add one more
thing. It's possible that she is doing that
in order to keep momentum with the people
that support her, even though in her mind,
she doesn't believe that. Who knows? Does at
the end of the day, saying you'd still
vote for him even though you just outlined
that he's lying about everything is the peak
of stupidity to me. And it shows the
two party illusion as always. The peep the
the idea that you get trapped in this
binary way of thinking that there are only
two choices and that if it's one, it's
the other. That's just even even now with
what we're seeing blows my mind.
But here's five times August. It is quite
fascinating watching Trump throw his entire base under
the bus over and over again like like
this.
MAGA is more divided than ever now.
Again, I've been pointing these things out because
I believe this was happening and gotten a
lot of flack for it. And I think
today, at this point, it is becoming very
obvious that it's always been this way. So
I'm not doing this to go, I was
right. That's certainly part of it, to acknowledge
that we were correct, if you think that.
But the main thing is for people to
stand back and look.
This whole time, when you've when I at
least I have felt that the conservative base
was not on the same page, we weren't
being lied to. And the Benny Johnsons, the
Nick Soders, and Eric Daughtry, they're out there
screaming in unison that we're all winning and
it's all the same. The by the way,
almost exactly what was happening during COVID nineteen
from the Democrats. So stand back and look
at that picture and think now and learn
for the next lie
That when this comes around, don't follow the
screening popular people on Twitter, or look at
what they say, consider it, but don't blindly
take at face value what the team is
saying. And recognize that there's a massive amount
of momentum
that keeps people trapped in what I argue
doesn't even represent the even close to the
majority of people today. That's the false two
party paradigm, and that's what we're seeing, you
know, balancing on a knife's edge right now.
On Trump's side of it, yes, but the
same thing from before.
I just really think people need to, like,
absorb that. And as he's saying here,
more divided than ever. And I believe it's
been clearly that way since, I mean, Stargate
forward for the most part. And I honestly,
my largest, my bigger opinion is that the
two party illusion, people in general have been
pulling away from this for
multiple administrations. This is just now finally breaking
through. Now it says, though the infighting seems
intentional by design, I would agree with that
in a lot of ways, Admittedly, the MAGA
base was something that kept me naively optimistic
for so long. See? Because he has principles.
Even to the point to where he's go
willing to say, which never happens on this
platform, that I was mistaken.
This I was incorrect in this. I've been
mistaken plenty of times.
Does he and he goes on to say,
the base was something that kept me optimistic.
And he says, I thought that he had
to deliver on his promises or his base
would eat him up. You'd think so, wouldn't
you? Now I argue the base
is and does do that, but the people
that they only allow you to see screaming
above it all with all their million followers
will lie to you about it and pretend
that's what the base thinks. It says, turns
out he knew his base would eat itself
up, so he just does whatever he wants.
But this has been going on for a
while now. Just as the COVID backs injured,
he left them completely high and dry. Amazing
how we don't talk about that. Suffering and
still to this day brags about how great
the thing was. Complete middle finger straight to
the face.
100%.
This is funny to me. So five times
August has been saying this like I have
for a while, but he's saying prediction, the
next US election will be the lowest voter
turnout in modern history due to widespread recognition
and acceptance
unity party, which is both the idea that
there's only really one government lie
excuse me,
lying to us using the parties, but also
that we're a blind adherence to what Israel
wants through them. And there's two things there,
but it's one conversation for me. And and
I 100%. I agree with this. And I've
as you guys well know, I've been saying
this, maybe not explicitly that the next turnout
will be that low, but that that's why
people are
flocking away from the two party illusion. That's
why only 40% even participate. And within that
40%,
60% of them are independent. I mean, it's
such an obvious life for such a long
time. But I'm glad five times August with
his reach can get this more notice. And
what's funny is Orange Orange Shroyer goes, great
observation and prediction.
Yeah? Oh, thank you, Owen. We've been saying
it for a long time. Of course, elections
are rigged and stacked with mail ballots and
who who knows what else? Yes. But I
agree. My point is to highlight regardless that
the sentiment has begun to go mainstream.
So that's all because of you guys, whether
or not they they swing around and go.
TLAB's been doing that for fifteen years. It's
good that people get it in the mindset
because this and get ready for the next
minefield, the next QN on Russiagate, the next
thing they use to try to force you
to logically
decide
to to
trust part of the power structure. Right? That's
what QAnon, Russia Gate, that's what it was.
Right? Part of their insider team was actually
the white hats fighting from you for you
from within. Right? And so both of those
things were trying to do that.
This I'm telling you, whether it's Elon's America
party, there's gonna be something that's used to
try to make you go, okay. That's the
good people or those are the good people.
They're the ones fighting from within. That's what
this administration was supposed to be. That's what
Elon Musk was supposed to represent. Those things
fell on their face.
Matt Morse,
who has 36,000
followers, he says, I am one of the
largest pro Trump commentators in the nation. Now
I don't know if I agree. You know?
Look. Who knows? Maybe that's the case. I
wasn't familiar with him before this, but it
he it's what he says. And he says,
I get tens of millions of views every
single month talking about Trump's America First agenda.
And right now, I'm absolutely effing beyond pissed
off that tonight,
for as a justification for h one b
visas, and I think it was a couple
different kinds, but that one was included, Trump
said that Americans don't have talent.
He did, guys. I'll play it for you
right now. And I just think this is
pretty unreal, as he says, because it is
showing you I mean, I like I wrote,
I don't feel I don't see how you
don't take that in some way as disdain
for the American people. Now here's the interesting
thing before we get into the next part.
Right? Think about this.
Right now, Donald Trump is, I think, pretty
frustrated. I think he's seeing that even the
majority of his base is not blindly going
along with what he says. And he's I
think he's used to that, at least feeling
that way. And he I think whether either
he
is always been lied to that everyone's been
on his side, and now he's suddenly seeing
that and doesn't know why it's not the
way it was before, or he's always known
and he's been lying, but now the lie's
getting out. Like, however you look at it,
my opinion is that he's really frustrated
that he's not being able to walk out
and what what was the thing he said
on on 1st Avenue and shoot somebody and
they still support me? You know, the whole
thing he did or the snake poem? You
know? Now people are finally starting to go,
maybe you are the snake. Maybe I do
see it. And I think that really bothers
him. And so I get the sense that
he
is right beneath the surface pretty unhappy, even
even disdainful about his own people. Because aren't
they supposed to be the ones that back
me no matter what? And now they're out
there calling me Epstein, this and that. I
think there's a level of hatred right there,
frustration, just irritation.
And so when you see this kind of
thing, I think it's interesting.
You know, the idea that, where was that?
It was the wrong one.
Oh, sorry. This one here about the h
one b overlap.
That when he says something like this, that
I think that it speaks to that there
is a little bit of a frustration there.
Like, no. You know, there's not that talent
here. I don't know. You could take it
for yourself. I get the sense that there
is a little bit of disdain for just
general American people, and I think most elitists
feel that way. But here's five times August.
Oh, I'll I'll read what he said next.
This is what Trump said in this interview.
This was very recent. Ever gonna be a
country like what we have right now. And
does that mean The Republicans have to talk
about it a lot. And does that mean
the h one b visa thing will not
be a big priority for your administration? Because
if you wanna raise wages for American workers,
you can't flood the country with with tens
of thousands or hundreds of thousands of foreign
workers. Right. And which was the big thing
from Elon and him and everybody else, despite
them having a little bit of a nuanced
argument. We can be honest about that. It
wasn't just no or all. Right? And I
I talked about it then. But this was
more so a sentiment from his supporting supporters,
who largely were just like none of it.
Right? But then it came out, as I'll
show you in a second, that Trump and
Elon used it basically more than anybody.
And so it's a little bit of a
mixed bag or, like, a lie. I would
call it a misrepresentation
about what they were focusing on. And so
now that it's kind of be we're moving
to the next thing and it's something he
needs to use, now it becomes,
we need that. Well, isn't that exactly what
was being argued in other circumstances, maybe even
outside of h one b? It just becomes
whatever they wanna politically drive in that moment.
Now because this is something I argue he
wants to do or now that it's being
pointed to and he's gonna do it anyway,
the response
is we need it.
And not just that. Even just that, I
would argue, would be enough to say, well,
if you need that, then what you're saying
is we don't have that here. He comes
out and straight up says that.
B visa thing will not be a big
priority for your administration. Because if you wanna
raise wages for American workers, you can't flood
the country with with tens of thousands or
hundreds of thousands of foreign workers. Also do
have to bring in talent when you're done
with it. Talented people here. No. You don't.
We don't have talented people here. You don't
have you don't Wow. Okay. So, you know,
I was when I first saw that, I'm
like, okay. Is it edited? Like, no. That's
just
undeniable,
which I'm already seeing people try to, you
know, in real time reimagine what was that's
not what he meant, and you're taken out
of context. You tell me how that's taken
out of context. She reiterates you there's not
no talent not enough talent here? No. No.
Play it again.
Tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of
foreign workers. Also do have to bring in
talent
when Well, we have plenty of talented people
here. No. You don't. We don't have talented
people here. You don't have you don't have
certain talents, and you have to people have
to learn. Okay.
Well, she said we have plenty of talent
here. No. No. No. You don't. We we
don't? No. No. That was exactly how that
went. Then he says, we have,
or was it? Talented people here. No. You're
not. No. You're not. We don't have talented
people here. You don't have you don't have
certain talents and You don't have certain talents.
Okay. You could try to argue. Okay. Well,
he just meant that that's we don't have
you know, there's specific things that we need
to find. Okay. Even that. So your argument
is that we have there's certain talents that
we need for where this country is going
that we do not have in this country.
Or at the very least, you wanna find
one better, though or that it's better somewhere
else. I mean, there's maybe that's just the
truth, by the way. You can decide for
yourself. But what's interesting is how much that's
frustrating people who have been told the exact
opposite by him and all of his team.
And the argument being, it should be America
first over anything else.
It just these things are completely contradictory to
anybody who's honest about the basic principle of
the point. You have to people have to
learn. You can't take people off an unemploy
like, an unemployment line and say, I'm gonna
put you into a factory who will make
missiles or I'm gonna Which is exactly what
happened in World War two, by the way.
Did we ever do it before? Well, let
me When you and I were gone. An
example. In Georgia,
they raided because they wanted illegal immigrants out.
They had people from from South Korea that
made batteries all their lives. You know, making
batteries are very complicated. It's not an easy
thing and very dangerous. A lot of explosions,
a lot of problems.
They had, like, five or 600 people,
early stages to make batteries and to teach
people how to do it. Well, they wanted
them to get out of the country. You're
gonna need that, Laura. I mean, I know
you Okay. Okay. Yeah. So when you
when you see an interest in these immigrants
being here because of a need for your
industries or your business, then it's okay. Right?
Who cares if they're breaking the law? Who
cares if they're one of those evil, rapist,
murdering, villainous immigrants that you old bastardized without
ever knowing who you're pointing at? All the
ones we abstractly point to are all like
that, but all the ones that he doesn't
you know, it's insulting to your intelligence.
Are you vetting everyone? It's like the farm
point he made from before. If it's a
farm that needs these people, well, we'll make
a deal with the farmer. So you somehow
just know every illegal if they're illegal immigrants,
then how can you possibly know their background?
It's insane, and it's contradictory.
The truth is he's simply saying that we
will keep these people when we need them.
Well, that's just as likely to be rapist
m MS 13, or whatever possible broad overlap
since you're not vetting any of these things.
And 90% of the people that you're pointing
to, arresting, sending to El Salvador are not
even close to the things you're claiming.
So if we can't recognize by now that
he played everyone,
now in that we shouldn't say it like
that. Plenty of us saw it, including conservatives,
but that he was attempting to play everyone.
The idea simply being that we have to
go after all these evil villains and then
didn't do that. And in fact, made deals
with the worst of them, the MS thirteen
leaders, to make them to go back to
work with El Salvador. I mean, it's all
right there on the surface.
So they don't they didn't really care about
going after the bad guys. They cared about
using that to institute
their control measures, to scoop up all of
your data, to act to train their models
on the AI, to Israel, to Palantir, all
of it.
We have to be honest about that by
now. You and I disagree on this. You
can't just say,
a country's coming in, gonna invest $10,000,000,000
to build a plant, and get to take
people off an unemployment line who haven't worked
in five years. Alright. Of course. Obviously, because
literally everybody who might work there, all of
them come right off the unemployment line. No.
There's going to be people in this country
who do have expertise.
And and there's this sub business now, look,
just in a general sense, my mindset is
I I think that this should be the
prerogative of the companies. If there's somebody from
another country that has the legal reality to
come here through a Visa and wants to
work, I don't understand why that's an issue
for everybody. It should be if we're genuinely
talking about meritocracy, then how is that different?
Now it it there I'm sure there's always
other factors to include, but this the point
is that this neither of those things are
what they really care about. And they're gonna
start making their missiles. It doesn't work that
way.
Yeah. It really does. And the truth is
as even as
Five Times August points out, that's exactly what
happened before.
He says, well, we had zero experienced housewives
making aircrafts and tanks in World War two,
and POTUS acts like we can't train Americans
to make batteries, or that there's not Americans
that currently know how to do that in
this country.
I simply said, am I missing something, or
does this feel like Trump expressing disdain for
the American people? Sure does to me. Trump
says United States doesn't have people with certain
talents to fill the jobs domestically. That's exactly
what he said. I mean, that's even taking
the more benign version of what he said,
that they just don't have certain talents.
And even and then
people are
acting like this is taken out of context.
By the way, it's funny. Just since I
just looked at there I don't know if
you whoever lives in Tennessee, we are being
absolutely invaded by these Japanese beetles that look
they're, like, identical to ladybugs.
It's just for those in Tennessee, you'll know
exactly what I'm talking about. It's insane. Like,
they just work their way in. I just
saw one flying across the room. It's just
wild. Anyway, then I need to tell you
that, but I just think it's crazy how,
like, they're, like, invasive, but and it's all
across the state. We were just driving around
town, and, like, these just covered everywhere. Anyway,
back to the point.
Forbes,
as Trump defends foreign workers, his company sought
record numbers in 2025.
This this is not new. I mean, I
think this article was from,
November 12, but we talked about this back
around the h one b visa point, him
and Elon Musk. You know? It's their if
I mean, if you don't if you're insulted
by the the push, what they did first,
then finding things out like this, then then,
again, my opinion would be that you were
gonna side with them regardless.
This is dishonesty, guys. That's period. And ruining
people's lives based on claiming that that's what
it was and really not even being about
that, largely about Israel and foreign policy, I
mean, you just have to recognize how deceitful
that is.
And on top of that, here is Noam
coming back around and arguing this was always
a plan, saying saying basically under Trump's administration,
we've sped up our process
and added integrity to the visa programs, the
green cards, all of that. And, also, more
people are becoming naturalized. Oh, so you've sped
up visas and green cards? I mean, how
does that I mean, is anybody gonna act
like that makes sense? The exact opposite when
you guys go on Fox and talk about
how immigration's been a standstill, not a single
person's come through and then except we otherwise,
it has sped up our processes.
I don't know which is true at this
point. I mean, it's just insane the level
of lies that will come out of people's
mouths.
And meanwhile,
this is another important lie that overlaps with
Israel that I think is I mean, you
know my opinion about what's going on in
this administration.
I mean, I've all even just grabbed just
one of these
articles. I've I've done many or shows rather.
I've done many of these, but this is
just the one that I think the title
encapsulates exactly what I think is happening, the
new Trump administration and the technocratic Zionist coup
of the United States. But it's not just
about Trump or Republicans. If you haven't been
watching this show, it's about the one government
who is using that to keep us divided
while selling out to the highest bidder,
which again is really not even that unique
of a point today. Everyone seems to be
able to call it out, yet it's still
weirdly considered completely ridiculous in certain circles of,
like, the highest conversation. Even in mainstream alternative
media, highest not meaning most respectful or respectable
or or even most intelligent or honest. Just,
you know, the most reach.
But here's DC Drano.
He goes, here's an idea. How about instead
of fifty year mortgages, we start which is,
you know, Trump's thing, which is ridiculous, by
the way, As people pointed out, what's the
difference between renting your entire life and a
fifty year mortgage? Well, tons and tons and
tons more money paid in interest. But the
point is how about instead of fifty year
mortgages, we start banning Blackstone,
BlackRock,
China, and illegal aliens for buying single family
homes?
Okay.
Pretty I mean, the idea of illegal aliens
buying single family homes, I'm sure there's instances
of that, but the idea that that's even
you know, these people are lost in some
illusory idea of what's going on in the
world or really just whatever the narrative talking
points are that day. Point point in fact,
we're talking about BlackRock. Right? And I simply
go, so you're finally calling out Trump, which
I, you know, of course, know there will
never be engagement on these things as he
gets suppressed into Bolivian. But the point is,
BlackRock's Larry Fink abruptly becomes a part of
Trump's inner circle.
Right? Or BlackRock working with Elon Musk, Linux
AI, BlackRock working with I mean, Israel I
mean, it's it's only a problem apparently when
it's anybody but Trump's team. But he's on
the inner circle of Trump. So if you're
gonna start criticizing BlackRock, then you're calling out
Donald Trump, but he won't make that connection.
But this is the point today. The point
is if we're gonna start screening about right
and we should, by the way, BlackRock and
what they're doing in the real estate field,
I wonder if VC Drano was willing to
call out another supposedly American company even called
American Landmark.
Let's talk about that.
Susan
Abuhalla points out an article from The Nation.
An investigative
report by The Nation reveals an Israeli real
estate company is one of the top companies
buying up apartment buildings in The United States
and mass evicting American tenants to hike up
the rent. Now I'm not trying to decouple
this from BlackRock. I'm willing to bet you
that BlackRock is very much a part of
this because Israel is very much a part
of this, and Trump's administration is very much
a part well, this is the point. It's
one thing, and the left, right, it's all
coming together right now for control over your
life. Whatever possible, she writes, or wherever possible,
they are making ICE do their dirty work.
See how this works? Pretending to be doing
something else when it's really about what the
real agenda has always been. The company,
Elko,
operates through a housing company called Electra. This
company also operates in Jerusalem and the West
Bank where they use the Israeli military and
settler groups to forcibly remove Palestinians from their
homes, which are then handed over to imported
Jews from New York and other places around
the world. When we tell you they will
eventually do what they do to us, we're
not being hyperbolic.
Think about this. Now here's the article.
One of Israel's biggest companies is taking over
huge swaths of US real estate, and tenants
are paying the price if that's if they're
allowed to stay.
So
installed,
Kelly says, this is the it was, the
person, Darien Kelly,
says that the the
they installed a slew of gadgets, which I
I wasn't able to find out exactly what
that was, but probably smart meters and stuff
like that, that he says they didn't need
before raising the rent nearly $400 a month.
He could have told her about the eviction
notices the company kept filing against him, the
ones that came. He says with an onslaught
of fees, the vet virtually guaranteed he'd never
fully get back on his feet. Now who's
to say? Maybe this person is delinquent. Maybe
they you know, the point is raising rent
is not necessarily nefarious. People do it all
the time. What I find interesting is that
this seems to be a pattern. And you
can, as always, please read the entire article
to get the bigger picture. I'm just gonna
give you what I think is important here,
which is
an Israeli company that seems to be parading
around as an American company or rather a
company that was American that was taken over
by an Israeli platform
is essentially buying up real estate all over
the country, instantaneously
rising prices and boxing out most of the
people that are there. And I think this
is about maybe not most in some cases.
This to me feels like another larger element
of what Israel seems to be doing to
this country. Take it for whatever you want.
That's my opinion on it. You just understand
that this company,
which is acting against American interest while most
Americans are struggling to own homes and rent
and so on, are are are hurting I
mean,
are putting Americans in positions
of destitute.
But then recognizing that when people call this
stuff out,
they're not talking about that. Talking about BlackRock
and so on and only making it about
certain things that they then somehow only make
about Democrats.
Same thing everywhere we look.
Now it says before they came, rent was
manageable. I was never late. When they took
over, it became out of reach. Same kinda
point, but, you know, the sentiment you get
from the article is this seems to be
sort of a a like a as I'll
even read one of the statements, that is
the plan. That's what they plan to do.
But you could argue that's with the betterment
of the platform or the the building. Right?
You could always argue that's what the intention
is. So my point is not so much
about the rising of the red, but who's
doing this and what the outcome is. It
says the they that Kelly referred to is
American Landmark. That's the name. A major corporate
landlord with roughly 34,000
units concentrated in a 111
mega mega complexes
like Conrad across eight Southern states, particularly North
Carolina,
Florida, and Texas.
Pandemic began. Right? See, there's overlaps here, and
we all saw this. We all called that
massive transfer out when they were scooping up
homes. People made it about BlackRock, which I
guarantee is overlapped here. It says, and the
company with a private equity
structure that allows investors from all over the
world to bet on the growth of its
real estate portfolio is now America's thirty fourth
largest landlord.
Based on a review by The Nation and
type investigations
of thousands of eviction records from dozens of
American
dozens of American Landmarks properties as well as
the interview with its CEO, Joseph Lubbock,
it's clear that the company's management model inevitably
leads to the frequent displacements of tenants like
Kelly. At Conrad,
the company is filing eviction notices at a
rate nine times
the average the the national average. That stands
out.
Nine times the national average. There are other
buildings raising rent.
Something's amiss here as I'm sure you noticed.
I wouldn't be talking about it otherwise.
Housing experts told the nation the time the
type and type investigation. So there's the nation
and type investigations of the groups that were
looking into this, that they they housing experts
told them that they can worsen
a cycle of debt and have a disastrous
effect on people's ability to rent a home
in the future.
Now let's say Joseph Lubbock, who's the CEO,
confirmed that rent increases and displacement were actually
part of that strategy. When we take over
a property, he says we we do analysis
and how much rent was going to go
up. We typically raise the rent between a
100 to $400,
and the people are displaced. Now that doesn't
seem to be necessarily based on anything other
than just what their plan is once they
take over the companies
or the buildings. And it says whether they
stay or get priced out, these tenants are
also linked to a multinational
conglomerate that profits from the displacement of people
on the other side of the world. So
when you recognize that this this company is
investing and profiting from the displacement of Palestinians
in the West Bank, then you start to
see an overlap. You start to see an
overlap to this company profiting from the displacement
of Americans
inside the country.
Really uncomfortable to recognize that very same thing,
isn't it? And maybe that the same intention
behind both. It says
that that's because American Landmark is almost entirely
owned by what an a company called Elko,
one of Israel's largest corporations.
Of course and, of course, it's called them
you know, either it was I I think
it was originally that, but, of course, they
buy something called American Landmark and then turn
it into something doing Israel's bidding. It's pretty
perfect for how we've seen this operate.
It says for years, Elkovia, its Electra Superbrand,
has done extensive business in Israeli settlements,
illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank
in East Jerusalem. Israeli settlements drive many thousands
of Palestinians from their homes and are considered
illegal
under international law. I I even that. What
do you mean considered?
They're illegal under international law. That's the reality.
And, you know, it's just funny how that
statement still is watered down even on this
article. ELCO has also maintained deep ties to
the Israeli military, including during the genocide in
Gaza. So a company that literally is working
to this in this this very moment with
a government that's on the chopping block in
the international community for committing a genocide
and working with them to displace Palestinians from
homes that they legally own.
It says
that year,
this is 2016, they sold it all again,
rebranding. This is get just quickly jumping through.
The point is in 2008,
the Elko purchased 90% of Landmark Residential.
By 2011,
Landmark had bought 564,000,000
worth of real estate in The United States.
Let's see how long back this goes. In
the following years, the company repeatedly acquired massive
portfolios
only to sell them off at a tidy
profit and start again. Now there is something
there.
Now whether this is trading off with something
like BlackRock or whether or not it's another
Israeli company under the umbrella so it doesn't
look like it's just Israel conducting you know,
there's something here, guys. That doesn't even logically
make sense for the company just to sell
everything and start a new and and continue
to somehow stay profitable and control the market.
In fact, 2016, Lubbock and Elko had built
the new $2,000,000,000
portfolio.
Right. So between so five years later, after
dumping everything, they somehow built it all back
up against the $2,000,000,000.
Something is amiss, obviously. I think this is
bigger than just buying a property.
But so the point was that year, they
sold it all again, apparently, and rebranded as
American Landmark. Right? So Israel buys
Landmark Residential and turns it into American Landmark.
You can you can you factor it? Can
you deduce why that might be? Well, why
they would turn a company into something that
outwardly facing sounds like a apple pie American
company?
You guys aren't stupid. You know exactly what's
going on here. It's about trying to present
that forward.
Now it says, I mean and I'm gonna
play that clip again in a second. That's
just always important for people that haven't seen
that.
And it says that year, they sold it,
rebranding as American Landmark and snapping up thousands
and thousands of units.
Lubbock's higher ups at Electra have have touted
the way their partnership with Lubbock has become
an international money making machine.
Right? So in an essence, you're watching them
use this situation to extract wealth outside of
the American industry
American economy. In 2016,
with the creation of American Landmark, what we
did was essentially transform Electra Real Estate, Lubbock
says, from a traditional real estate company into
a private equity firm.
Right. So that makes it more overlap with
BlackRock and the whole thing that we're talking
about, the shadow bank that it is. Today,
Lubbock serves as the CEO of American Landmark
and the chairman of electric Electric America.
Electric America, an Israeli company that he's the
CEO of, under the ever growing umbrella of
Electra real estate
Haitian Israel.
Meanwhile, Electra has landed contract after contract in
the West Bank and expanded its ties to
the Israeli military in the midst of an
ongoing genocide that the whole world has documented.
Electra has extensive links to the West Bank
settlements. So right as we're doing this, as
they're displacing Americans from their homes, even if
it's just by increasing the rent, they're doing
the exact same thing to people in Palestine,
West Bank, as well as Gaza. Furthermore, Electra
is deeply intertwined with the Israeli military. Surprise,
surprise. So you could also call this an
intelligence operation. It owns Electra Power, which has
been, quote, the exclusive
gas supplier of the Israeli Defense Forces. So
literally allowing the the the fuel that's being
provided to continue the genocide
and the country's police and prison system services
for many years. You know, the prison systems
that are raping and torturing people. It says
and supplies gas to illegal settlements according to
American Friends Service Committee. Who who profits has
found that Elektra also helped to construct and
maintain
multiple Israeli military and police training facilities,
which are, in many cases, training ICE and
US police
to come back and enforce the the goodness
of the IDF on you. The 2020 in
2024, well into the Gaza genocide, ElectraPower's
CEO said on an Alco earnings call that,
quote, the IDF is a major client. As
we said, we should we stand shoulder to
shoulder with them in facing challenges and fulfilling
missions.
We are likely the only supplier that can
say we've expanded expanded
our areas of deployment.
Deployment.
This is a great source of pride for
us. Think about how unnerving that is. You're
talking about the CEO
of the central company that is largely
owns 90% or more of the American Landmark
Company.
And what they're saying is,
we expanded our areas of deployment
while speaking of these companies and what they're
doing in The United States. Deployment.
It just never ceases to amaze me how
seemingly
blatant this is.
American landmark.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are then funneled
into the machine of Elko owned Israeli corporations
that are helping to wreak havoc on Palestinians.
So as they extort more wealth from The
US, they then use that to go hurt
people in other parts of the world.
Fantastic.
You know, this really does bother me in
a lot of ways. Right? That that right
now, we have this effort by the Republicans,
team sport Republicans, not all conservatives,
to make you focus on problems, but in
a selective way, sort of like the two
lesser of two evils in the left right
paradigm. It's how these peep it's how these
governments operate.
So instead of focusing on the real problem
or during the COVID nineteen point when it
was still this company and it was about
Biden and the whole and it was selling
out to China. Well, turns out that really
wasn't the big picture.
Surprise. Surprise.
So
on on overlap point to Israel,
another lie in the same vein has people
in the team sport politics side of this
sell you on something else.
Same exact kind of idea, right, where they
sell you on an idea that is the
opposite of what's actually happening.
So you buy the claim of what's happening
and ignore what's actually going on. Right? So
in this case, what do we keep seeing
from all these partisan media apparatus people? Well,
they come out and say Netanyahu is going
to decouple from the from the,
US aid,
which anybody with a brain is I I
I didn't even look into this. I said,
I highly doubt that's going to happen.
Near near impossible for how much they depend
on that. Right?
And but here here's the quote. I'm actually
gonna play it. It's just he says, we
don't need US soldiers. We're fine. We fight
on our own battle. Not true. Flatly, completely
false.
But it's so basically, they're coming out, not
to further press necessarily, but this is the
black MAGA preacher
saying, I'm a 100% behind it. No more
handouts. Israel's beast is on its own. Now
hey. Okay.
Even most of MAGA,
interestingly,
weirdly, does see the Israeli problem, not not
Jewish, but Zionist Israel problem. And it's that
is disputed by some of the very same
people. The point, though, is that
it, at the same time, support Trump in
blindly supporting them. It doesn't make any sense.
But what the point is is this is
him saying, we're gonna phase out the aid.
Now you've gotten all these TeamSport players out
there going, see, Trump's gonna save this, and
we're getting rid of Israel. Save them for
last. Except that's not at all what's actually
happening. Yesterday, Israel seeks a twenty year military
aid deal with The United States.
Every single time, guys. But if you don't
look to antiwar.com
with their source and excellent journalism and you
listen to Nick's order, then you're gonna be
misled. That's how that works. The point here
is that this is the extension of what
we've always been talking about, the memorandum of
understanding, right, which is 3,800,000,000
a year for it ended up being about
about $3,040,000,000,000
dollars.
So they're going to reinitiate this. I will
bet my life that Donald Trump will either
give them the same thing or make it
more.
Watch.
That's what I predict. Definitely could be wrong
as always. That's just my opinion, but watch
as that happens because they are not going
to stop funding this, and Trump has done
doubling down everything pro Israel. But here's the
team out there lying to you about the
opposite going on. We're gonna decouple from everyone.
Alex Jones came out and said, Netanyahu and
Trump are splitting ways. I told you. My
sources are always right, and that didn't happen,
and then no one called that out
Every single time. So as Candace writes, as
we get into the Epstein point, they are
blackmailing president Trump in broad daylight.
The slow release of the emails is intentional.
Now that's her opinion. Interesting thought, though, isn't
it? Now he will give them whatever they
want.
For those who struggle with con context clues,
they equals Israel, who Jeffrey Epstein worked for.
This is how our nation is run.
Interesting. Right? Now you may disagree with your
point. But what I find really interesting, first
of all, it's obviously possible.
But
blackmailing Donald Trump in broad daylight. Now that
would mean
that Israel is driving him to go in
their direction. Sort of like,
excuse me, hiccups all of a sudden,
Charlie Kirk. Right? That was what he, arguably,
as Candace points out,
would was recognizing.
Yeah.
It was recognizing,
in my opinion, that Zionism was the real
issue. Because you could see even up to
that point, he was still supporting Israel. But
in you could see the issue with seeing
Netanyahu trick Trump to bomb Iran, for example,
and that he was unhappy about that. And
the Zionist influence to force him to lie
on pot and he called that out. Not
about Israel, though, but about the Zionist, about
the people who were trying to convince to,
you know, to to lie about what's going
on. And and the funding he refused and
all of this stuff. Right? So the argument
would be that Zionist infrastructure
would be doing the same thing to Trump.
And whether he knows it or not or
is able to stop it, that's the highlight
is that maybe he's going another way. And
they had to drip these emails out to
force him back into line, which would make
a lot of sense. But the only way
this makes sense, guys, is if you recognize
that Israel is influencing, if not controlling, every
element. The democrat, the left, the right, all
of it, the government. Because if you're seeing
him drip by her what she's insinuating is
that the the drip emails that the the
democrats were letting out, well, through the whole
thing with Massie and the whole thing, but
the point is he's calling it a democrat
hoax,
is what they're letting out to force him
back into position.
Now I it's hard to say because I
tend to see Trump as being very like,
a willing participant most of the time. But
it does it's interesting. But you the point
the takeaway from it is the two party
illusion, guys. It's obvious to see that they
will dictate and and influence and bribe and
sexually blackmail anybody in any position to get
what they want. So it's not about left
and right. It's about outside influence and the
and our government's selling us out right now.
But she's simply pointing out that he's being
blackmailed, so consider that as we go through
this. Now don't forget, just two points on
Maxwell.
We just talked about the insane point from
November 10 that Maxwell is getting a puppy
to play with in jail according to the
daily May the Holy Beast.
As as a on top of apparently getting
cushy treatment,
allowed to take you know, just basically treated
like she runs the place. The warden essentially
helping her put together documents for her case.
It's just it's unprecedented to me.
And a puppy. But on top of that,
here is a prison consultant revealing new details
on Maxwell's stay, saying she's treated with a
tremendous amount of deference.
Also, as it seems to be coming to,
we're but I I this is just another
you know, somebody claiming it's coming. I believe
it is, though. Maxwell being plan planning to
file a habeas petition soon, challenge her incarceration.
Now I get the sense it's not gonna
be a pardon because that would be too
uncomfortable for Trump right now, but it will
be something to that effect where he can
act like it was something that was supposed
to happen or the evidence cleared her or
whatever it is. We'll have to see. But
this is what most of us are predicting
outside the partisanship that this is where it
was going. The idea that any Republican or
conservative would would be okay with pardoning Maxwell
is beyond the pale right now. But here's
the clip from, the prison consultant and what
he's seeing.
From inside
Epstein accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell's prison camp. Federal prison
consultant Sam Mangle, you know him. He's been
on the show several times. He has clients
serving time alongside Maxwell, so he hears firsthand
what's happening there. He tells us that inmates
are frustrated
at the special treatment that they see her
receiving,
customized meals, they say, access to exercise areas
after hours,
and a puppy to play with. Whistleblowers have
been saying this. Now inmates, according to Mangle,
have gone directly to the warden,
and they're getting the sense that Maxwell won't
be there long.
Sam Mangle is out front now.
So, I mean, Sam, obviously, the significance of
that statement, I mean, could be everything. Right?
Because,
with what she is convicted of, you know,
she wouldn't be in this facility to begin
with. Right? She got moved there suddenly after
a meeting with the deputy attorney general. So
to be moved out of there might imply
a commutation, which we know she wants from
the president.
Why do the inmates believe she won't be
at the prison long?
Prison's a lousy place to be for anyone.
You lose all of your freedom, your rights,
everything. You really become a number. But the
general sense that Isn't that a weird point,
though? I gotta come back to that. Why
would you lose your rights?
You know what I mean? Like, in a
real sense, a constitutional sense, because you break
the law does not therefore mean that you
don't have rights anymore. I mean, they're still
afforded a trial. They're still afforded you know,
it's interesting.
You know? I I go back I have
to come back to that. It's sort of
like a fire in a theater thing. Like,
the reality would be that, sure, people should
be held you know, you should have consequences
for your you know, whatever. There's a nuance
to everything, but they break the law, there's
consequences. Right?
But the statement being that you don't have
rights, I don't know. That's interesting to think
about. I always just note those things that
where the government seems to carve out, like,
an opening to to you know, because most
people are gonna go, well, they're criminals. Right?
So you're not gonna wanna defend a criminal,
especially a really bad one. That's why Trump
was going, you know, the people bopping grandmas
on the head, you know, and then
deporting a person with a traffic ticket. You
know, it's it's that's how they do that.
Anyway, sorry to distract. Back to the point.
I'm getting from my clients and their families
that are there is that,
typically,
they're treated with, antipathy.
That's how staff treats an inmate.
But miss Maxwell is being treated with a
tremendous amount of deference,
and that is extremely
unusual,
if unheard of within the Bureau of Prisons
between inmate and staff.
And one comment that was passed to me
by the sister
of my client
was
the someone in the staff,
made a passing comment of, don't worry. You
won't have to put up with this very
long.
I don't know in what context it So
staff. You know? And so that's secondhand, though.
This person could be lying about that. But
I think it's already pretty clear with the
puppy and the allowance of being in the
first place.
You can't deny that this is over the
top. Like, this shouldn't even be happening in
the first She's already gotten a proper agreement.
She's already been given a given a
what's the right word? Not pardon, but that
that effectively works. You know, from whatever she
said in that discussion that she's pardoned from,
she can't be held accountable for rather.
Right? There's no way in which this makes
sense to anybody. Now, again, to the point
of them saying it, just because CNN points
it out does not therefore make it false.
It's obviously in their interest to point at
this and make Trump look bad for a
partisan left right idea,
but it's all it just because it's being
said by them does not mean it's not
true as always. In fact, it it's obviously
clear this is happening. You can't somebody in
this, prison is not supposed to be there
if they have a sexual,
predator background. They just ignored that. We know
we met she met with Blanche, gave her
all sorts of materials, asked her for specific
information, gave her the proper agreement, gave her
a puppy, let her leave. And by the
way, even that weird moment where they talked
about the work release, that was real. They
just everyone pushed back. The reality of it
as we found out when we talked about
in the show. She was given that work
release. She just was they turned her down
on a job she wanted. Last I checked,
I don't see any other one in its
place, but the fact that you could have
a sex trafficker
be allowed to leave from a place you
shouldn't even be in the first place for
a job.
This is so disgusting to me.
Imagine if this was Biden and that answers
all your questions.
Was said. But, obviously, what the you know,
is being discussed,
in the media
lends itself to a certain assumption.
Yeah. Well, it certainly does. And, obviously, we
know, you know, the reporting that she has
been
putting together a formal request,
for,
commutation.
Now just to again, to point out, Maxwell
was moved to this lower security prison without
any explanation right after meeting with Trump's DOJ.
Right? So she gets moved
and,
you know, the the treatment that she has
received is so interesting you say that usually
inmates are are treated with antipathy
and that in her case, the word to
be used is deference.
What more can you share about this deferential
special treatment?
It could be something as small as when
she first got there while she's dressed the
same way, gets the same food.
However, it's being brought to her from the
kitchen to,
where she's she's living.
And typically,
inmates can't take food out of the kitchen.
It's See, like, that alone,
again, it's him saying that, and he's getting
it from people in there, so question it.
But it does add up with what we're
seeing that she's being get brought her meals
personally.
It's pretty obvious that they they've been given
instructions to treat her differently. There's only one
place that comes from, guys, and that's the
current Trump administration.
Being brought to her. She got a new
mattress when she came in. And and trust
me, as someone who went through that, a
new mattress is a prized possession,
you know, in the
She's given
a lot of latitude
for, her outdoor rec time and her personal
time. I know that she's not working at
this point. She's not part of any social
groups.
The women tend to stay away from her.
Now, no, didn't say he doesn't have the
ability to. Just said at the moment. Right?
As I said, she she that's crazy to
me that she could potentially work off site,
which is just over the top, like everything
else. For a myriad of reasons.
Also, from what's being reported,
for her to have access to a computer
or Yeah. The warden,
again, is unheard of. It makes sense. And
even attorneys during legal visits don't have access
to the Internet. They can bring computers in,
but they're strictly to review files on a
hard drive. But she did. I mean, you
get the point, guys. There's really no denying
this. So whether or not she gets, as
somebody wrote in the good word, clemency in
the chat or or pardon in general or,
you know, whether that's where this goes, we'll
have to see. It seems pretty obvious though
that it would just be one more step
in the direction of completely contradicting all the
promises or what you claim you were gonna
do or as right now, the the immigration
focus has continued to take people away from
investigating sex crimes and pedophilia and sex traffic
rings, which is obviously the reality we talked
about right in the beginning. That's exactly what
happened. They shifted people from all sorts of
things largely where the very investigations that MAGA
thought they were focusing on. Just it's and
it's don't don't take that as left versus
right. They're all the same thing in my
mind. Now here's another article. This one from
Okay. It's entitled
Jeffrey Epstein's plot to let Donald Trump hang
himself ahead of February
exposed in shocking email. Now these were all
these were all coming out, and I'll get
to from where. This was just this one
simply says, Wolf, who described his relationship with
Epstein as strictly professional, reportedly recorded more than
a hundred hours of conversations with the late
pedophile between approximately 02/20/1439.
This this is funny. This right now, Megyn
Kelly is getting all this heat for saying
that
well, something about,
that what whether Epstein was a pedophile or
just a sex predator. You know? And look.
It's you hate on her all you want.
She's dishonest and disgusting in many ways and
and a partisan for sure. But the point
is still valid to point out that a
a pedophile is a very specific age bracket.
He's a disgusting sex predator, and I wouldn't
be surprised if he's a pedophile on top
of all of it. But the argument was,
you know, I this is what I said
in the beginning, which I thought was interesting,
that even the mainstream media shifted into calling
you a pedophile when before they were desperately
trying to hide all of that. And it
turns out that what the evidence shows that
he was just a sexual predator towards, like,
15, 16, 14 year olds. And that's disgusting.
It's absolutely abhorrent.
So what people are doing is making them
out to act like Meghan is somehow acting
like it's okay. I highly doubt that's what
she's doing even though I thought you're disgusting.
It's just interesting kind of overlap. Right? Words
do have definitions. So I I I thought
it was also interesting that they kinda just
waterfall, went with that term even though that's
you know, it's because this is what the
guidance was. It shows you that there's something
guiding the hands of how this media apparatus
works.
But over on the top of it, you
have the island and all the overlaps that
you could argue clearly that that's what he
was providing services for for all sorts of
pedophiles or whatever else he was doing and
then getting people on record, getting film, getting
recordings.
We can't hide from this anymore or those
that are trying to. We've always been talking
about it. This is a sexual blackmail network
that's run by intelligence. It's not a secret
anymore.
The point, though, all of it, is that
he arguably has information
about Trump. And it says in a 12/15/2020,
15 email sent on the day of the
CNN televised Republican primary debate, the author wrote
to Epstein, quote, I hear CNN planning to
ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you,
either on air or in scrum afterwards.
Said, heads up. And he says, I think
you should let him hang himself.
He if he says he hasn't been on
the plane or to the house, then that
gives you a valuable PR and political currency,
Wolfe's 2015 email said. You can hang him
in a way that potentially generates a positive
benefit for you, or if it really looks
like he could win, you could save him
generating a debt. So you could argue that
doesn't necessarily prove that he did something wrong,
more so that the insinuation
could be used against him. That's been all
that's always been one of the possibilities. Nonetheless,
this is clearly damaging for Trump right now,
showing you that there's much, much more going
on here. Now Epstein alleges Trump knew about
the girls in one of these new emails
released by house Democrats.
Well, and it's not it's further to tell.
It's not just house Democrats. This is where
we overlap with what's going on with Nasty
and everything, but more emails.
Yes. Do they have an interest in making
this about Trump? Of course, they do. Doesn't
mean it's false, though. To to to and
and quite clearly, guys, historically, well, before we
got here, this was clear that Trump overlapped
with him in a lot of different ways.
Knew about the girls, doesn't necessarily mean that
he broke the law, right, other than not
telling anybody that he was raping women. Right?
This is obviously bad for Trump, and his
only response has been that it's not real.
Trump administration holds situation room meeting over house
effort to force release of all the files.
And as many people pointed out, this was
the day before yesterday, that, you know, you
don't have a situation room meeting about something
that's not a big deal. And brought in
Boebert and all the rest and ultimately tried
to pressure people. Boebert, it seems in particular,
even though she says otherwise now, the story
seems to be pretty clear that there was
an effort to try to get that to
go a different direction. As you've probably seen
as yesterday, this did get voted on, and
the information is coming out.
Trump sought to get Boebert to drop her
name from the Epstein Discharge petition. Now the
reason, as you know, since you watched this
show and plenty of others, is because of
the democrat who was about to be sworn
in that Johnson wasn't allowing sworn in.
She was allowed to be sworn in. So
now there's a moment where this could happen.
So it seems they did their best to
try to get as I was telling you.
Right? They were trying to find one republican
to take their name off the list. I
said that a month ago. And so, clearly,
that's what they were trying to do. This
seemed like a last ditch effort. She didn't
appear to do it. I think this is
this is the whole opportunism playing. It's, you
know, coming to to pass here. Here's a
clip from yesterday.
Epstein files
vote forced.
37. Developing this morning, movement in the fight
over whether to release the Epstein files. Yesterday,
house speaker Mike Johnson swore in newly elected
democratic representative
Adelita Grijalva of Arizona. Now she was the
final signature needed on a bipartisan discharge petition,
which allowed lawmakers to bypass Johnson
and force a vote to release files tied
to the late sex offender.
Now Grijalva signed the petition shortly after being
sworn in, and 217
other lawmakers signed that petition,
including Colorado congresswoman Lauren Boebert. A source tells
MSNBC that Boebert was not persuaded to remove
her name despite several efforts made by the
administration,
including a phone call from the president himself
earlier this week.
Now White House press secretary Carolyn Levitt acknowledged
the meeting, but said that she will not
detail any conversations that took place in the
situation room.
Speaker Johnson says that he intends to put
the Epstein resolution on the house floor for
a vote next week, but it's unlikely to
be signed in a law due to an
uphill battle in the senate. This all comes
after the house oversight committee released 20,000 documents
from Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The emails put new
scrutiny on president Trump's past relationship
with the convicted sex offender. Now see, all
of this is coming from the same momentum.
Right? So you have Massey trying to get
more momentum through congress, but you have the
oversight committee releasing you know, Of course, you
could argue that them releasing something could be
cherry picked. Of course, you could. Just like
you could have said that what Trump did
with his ridiculous phase one release was absolutely
cherry picked and edited and covered up. This
is what they're doing. And this is why
I think it's very obvious that it's a
game being played when both sides have something
to lose. And so it's a game of
chicken, essentially. Right? And you know the easiest
way to solve that problem? Release it all,
and they're not gonna do that.
In a 2011 email, Epstein told his co
conspirator,
Ghislaine Maxwell, that president Trump had never been
mentioned by accusers. But another email from 2019
claims that Trump knew about Epstein's activities.
The emails also contained the name of one
of Epstein's most outspoken victims.
That's Virginia Giuffre, who Now think about this,
guys. This this is pretty obvious to deduce.
Okay?
You one, you're not you're not stupid, and
you can see with your own eyes the
50 you know, I have I think there's,
like, 14 picture or no. Maybe
a bunch of pictures with Trump and Epstein.
A lot of different places over many spans
of, you know, a span of time. You
have him in regard to, you know, the
Mar A Lago even though he famously kicked
him out. You have all these overlaps over
the years. Epstein on record saying he was
closest friend for ten years. You know, it's
all there. It's really silly to pretend like
you don't know that there's a relationship. Right?
But then you have the email that says
he wasn't involved with anything. Okay.
That's the one anomaly. Now you've got more
emails that say that he did. So at
the the day, you've got the one thing
that seems to be an effort to hide
that he's involved and everything else showing you
that he's involved. Now that doesn't mean breaking
a law.
Let's just be objective about it. I argue
it's probably the case. But the reality is,
at the very least, we know he was
aware, involved, or I mean, I would argue
it's aware, but as as I think again,
the emails now say he was aware of
the girls or whatever. But let's just say
he was present. Right? He was there. I
think it's really easy to see that everyone
could have noticed what was going on. But
whether he broke the law or not, you
can still decide you can still dispute that.
Clearly, it's in his interest to cover it
all up anyway because it will be used
against him regardless.
But that's a lie no matter how you
spin it.
Who died by suicide earlier this year. Her
brother and sister-in-law,
they live in Colorado Springs, and they've been
pushing congressman Jeff Krank to support the release
of all the Epstein documents.
Back in September, Sky Roberts and his wife,
Amanda, they stood outside Krank's office advocating for
the bill.
Congressman Krank, I ask you, do you believe
that sexually abusing minors and young women is
above the law? You could do this today.
Sign the Epstein Files Transparency Act and vote
yes on the survivor supported
bill.
Our Brett Forrest spoke with representative Crank last
month and asked him about the Epstein files
and petition. Crank tells us that he never
signs discharge petitions because they, quote, hand control
of congress over to the minority party.
Now Brett wanted to ask him this. Do
you want the Epstein files released? Not only
do I want them released, I wanted them
released when Joe Biden had control of them.
They all say this. Johnson says this. Trump
they all pretend that.
But you you you but but then go,
oh, but we can't hand over part power
to the minority party. Oh, okay. So politics
are more important than sex trafficking victims. Thank
you. I mean, obviously, that's what they're telling
you. My political dynamic is more important than
doing the right thing.
Which I I strangely
noticed that many of these groups that are
out there calling for the release of the
Epstein files were very, very quiet when Joe
Biden had control of the Epstein files. It
was only when Donald Trump got there. Back
and forth and back and forth, and it's
the same thing. They none of them want
this released if you start to pay attention.
Right? Or at the very least, over periods
of time, they all have a point at
which they try to stop it, which I
think speaks to the same thing.
Here is an article. Trump reacts to newly
surfaced Epstein
emails mentioning him. And what do you think
he called it? A hoax.
Only a stupid Republican would fall into that
trap. I mean, that's lazy arguments right there.
What he's trying to do is go, if
you fall for this, you're not really a
Republican.
The only thing that works on are desperately
blind followers who will lurch at any chance
to be like, I'm on your side. People
who have integrity and principles are gonna laugh
at that.
But that's that's the best you're gonna get.
Even though you can prove that most that
I mean, what we're this is all true
information.
It's a hoax. His argument's probably that they're
using these to claim he broke the law,
and that's the hoax, or maybe he's not
even getting into that. It's all a hoax,
apparently. But you promised everything. Right? We're all
gonna phase one files, but it's a hoax.
Well, White House slams Democrats'
bad faith Epstein doc release as demand for
files intensifies.
Republicans call document release cherry picked. Okay. Probably.
Does that mean they're false? You can't this
is how they're playing this game. You keep
making the k the state the statement that
they're manipulating it. Well, that with the truth
is probably the point here.
Ultimately, what they're trying to say is that
they're manipulating it, but then letting you assume
that means it's all false and letting the
Benny Johnsons of the world make that case
without that being the statement. When in reality,
you can easily prove
that Trump very well had an overlapping relationship
with him very much, his best friend for
ten years according to Epstein, and all the
many different things. And they're just trying to
hide this behind bad faith. Democrats bad. If
you buy this, you're not a Republican.
That's how dumb that they think we are.
New York Times, house Democrats released emails, which
we just discussed,
saying that Donald Trump knew of the convicted
sex offender's conduct and spent many hours at
the house. We already know this in regard
to spending at the house.
Ro Khanna says the only reason these emails
are out is that Lawrence O'Donnell had the
survivors law lawyers on who gave me the
tip to subpoena the estate.
Think about this. So, I mean, look, I'm
not arguing that any of them are on
your side.
The interest is clear from a political standpoint,
but we we shouldn't assume that they're all
guilty either. We should be objective and wait,
whether Trump or Biden or anybody. In this
case, though, what he's saying is that so
right now, you have the the Republicans desperately
trying to keep this from coming out. I
think that's pretty obvious. And you could argue
Democrats feigning interest, but maybe not doing much
more. But then you have somebody in the
media
bring on Ro Khanna as well as the
e the lawyers of the survivors, the ones
out there going, we know it's all there.
We don't care about our names. Put it
all out there. And then Trump and them
going, we don't we care about the victims.
Well, they're the ones telling you to put
it out. Right? So it's just a disgusting
game. You're using them to cover up the
crimes that were committed
in that were, you know, that were they
were violated with those crimes.
And
gave him the insight to subpoena this certain
thing. He did so and
got access to all this information, which means
that they've always had this information, which means
the Department of Justice and, you know, FBI,
whatever else that they knew this was all
there, and then FBI, like Cash Patel, lied
to you in front of congress because here
are the files. They got it after getting
the subpoena. It says, why did justice or
the FBI not get or release these? You
just can't hide from this anymore. This has
fallen apart in front of them,
and most conservatives are now calling about too.
New York Times, if you wanna read the
entire thing, Epstein alleged in emails that Trump
knew of his conduct.
I don't I don't trust violating any of
these platforms, but the fact is you can
prove that these things are real.
Here is Newsweek Donald Trump impeachment chances surge
amid Epstein revelations.
Now my general opinion is that we need
somebody to be impeached. I mean that in
a in a functional sense if we you
know, I look. I'd like to be build
toward a world with no government at all.
But if we're forced to live within this
state of society, the only way you can
even maintain the illusion of our check and
balance system is for congress to do anything.
Should have impeached Biden, should have impeached Obama,
Bush, and all the rest of my opinion.
And that's not even an opinion. They're all
war criminals. You can literally prove that they
all did act committed crimes that were worthy
of impeachment.
Gotta start somewhere. My point is that Trump
right now is breaking the law just like
all the rest of them. If you wanna
retroactively
deem them all impeach, good. Go for it.
I don't care to make somehow make it
all equal for your partisan mind. Trump in
this place, in this moment, needs to be
held accountable.
Hopefully, so the next president doesn't feel, as
the Democrat, that they could do whatever they
want to. So this is simply pointing out
that now this is all falling at their
feet. It's starting to get a little momentum.
And I'm I'm glad to see that. I'm
sure people will take that as an anti
Trump thing. It's not. It's a it's a
wanting accountability in our government again thing.
The chances that president Donald Trump will be
impeached have surged according to PolyMarket, which is
that's, in my opinion, more reliable than the
polls they show you, but even still then
is manipulatable,
after the publication of more files from the
Epstein files had come out. On Wednesday, lawmakers
released more than 20,000 pages. Now I haven't
looked through all of it. I'm sure there
are people out there diving through it. I'll
probably be covering some of the important parts
that are coming. Following this release, according to
online gambling website, Polymarket, a platform where users
can place bets on the likelihood of world
events. The chances that Trump will be impeached
by the 2026
increased from 5% on Wednesday to 15%.
So all that really shows you is that
average people betting on this feel 10% more
in the direction that it's gonna happen. That's
a pretty big jump. So polls can easily
be manipulated.
People people tend to bet on what they
think they wanna win. So I think that's
a pretty reliable thing to look at. It's
not absolute. Right? Because it's only people that
choose to bet on it. Maybe maybe people
that bet have a different political side. I
mean, who knows? But at the end of
the day,
I just find that relevant. And then what
we're seeing is is inching towards, like,
a release valve.
I doubt it'll be Trump, but if it
comes down to it and he is very
much exposed, throwing Trump out of the way
with Vance in place seems to fit every
agenda.
Says these emails prove literally nothing. Democrats on
the mainstream media are desperately trying to use
this hoax, you know, otherwise known as provable
information,
a distraction to talk about anything other than
Democrats getting utterly defeated by Trump in the
in the shutdown fight.
You know what's so funny? Is they built
this entire thing around the shutdown when we're
so tired of this fake shutdown thing they
do every single time? And so he's trying
to go, look at how well I beat
them in the shutdown thing. And we're like,
I don't even think most conservatives cared that
much about it other than TeamSport politics.
Like, it was it's it's embarrassing for him
to say this very important thing that everyone
cares about is is fake and and hoax,
and they were distracting from my win against
the shutdown, which ultimately was compromising on both
sides to allow the government not to be
I mean, this is just pretty sad. That's
a very, very lazy argument.
Here's what Trump had to say.
This is from, I believe, today.
Yeah. Today. Now that the Democrats are using
the Epstein hoax involving Democrats, not Republicans,
See, that's that's what I feel like he's
trying to get at. They're like, somehow, because
they're only giving you part of the picture,
that's a hoax. But that's not the definition
of the word hoax, Trump. You're implying that
everything they're showing you is a false and
that is false. That's just not true. But
he goes,
using that, again, involving Democrats, but not Republicans,
to try and deflect from their disastrous shutdown,
like their shutdown again. That's just silly. Both
sides have to play a part in allowing
that to continue. And then they both ultimately
slightly compromise to make it's what happens every
single time. And it says, and all of
their own failures, I will be asking AG
Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice, together
with our great patriots of the FBI, to
investigate Jeffrey Epstein's involvement and relationship with the
government?
With with, you know, who oh, broad nope.
Just with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman,
j JPMorgan Chase, and many other people in
the institutions to determine what's going on with
them and him.
Right. Okay. So he's going to investigate the
Democrats. That's actually what he came out and
said. That's what Evie we are going to
investigate
Democrat connections to to Epstein.
I mean, this is what I'm talking about.
This is the game of back and forth.
Then none of them have the interest of
wanting to show you all of it.
And it says, they determine what's going on
with them. He says, this is another Russia
Russia scam with all arrows pointing to Democrats,
except all of the arrows pointing at you.
Records show that these men and many others
spent large portions of their life with Epstein
and on this island.
Well, first of all, you were a Democrat
before you got to this place, so it's
just a funny, funny thing that they're doing.
But it's you know, this is I mean,
I don't even need to explain these statements
with what's happening or why Republicans are going,
this is I just can't keep pretending anymore.
But here's Caroline Leavitt coming out to lie
to you. If not for the Jeffrey Epstein
story, CNN will be forced to talk about
how Chuck Schumer and the Democrats got shellacked
by president Trump and the government shutdown fight.
I mean, it's just sad. Well, I mean,
what are we talking about? So the fact
that you guys argued
to reopen the government around one issue around
funding, you know, okay, good. So you stopped
them from that thing. Is that really that
that's the biggest story, and that's not even
really what happened. That was a lie to
begin with, and they both played into it.
But he won the shutdown fight. And now
government's back to control your life. We win.
Now it says it's not like that ever
stopped, by the way, but it said it's
clear that this is another Democrat mainstream media
hoax just parroting what she's told, that's their
job, fueled by fake outrage to distract from
the president's wins.
Republicans, don't be fooled. Too late. No. I
shouldn't even say it like that since it's
not being fooled, but, you know, she's trying
to say don't go in that direction. President
Trump will remain focused on making America affordable
again.
Ma.
M a a a, ma, let's make America
affordable again. That's not what's happening. In fact,
it's the exact opposite. Grocery prices are up.
Rent is up. Everything's up. Oh, thanks, American
landmark.
All of it's going in the wrong direction.
Everybody who's honest could point that out. That's
it the game of saying your grocery prices
are down is just not true. You can
ask Rock. You can look it up on
the consensus. They're lying to you. They know
that. They don't care.
There's Bennet Johnson to cement the lie. New.
President Trump says Democrats need to start asking
Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, and Larry Summers about
Epstein.
Cool. Breaking news.
Deflection.
That's what they do. Right? Whatever the thing
was today, I support the current thing. That
should be their tagline.
Derek Pro says, I've been reporting on Epstein
since 2016.
Went to his house in 2018 to film
a scene for my documentary bringing down Jeff
Jeffrey Epstein.
I've never claimed there was solid evidence proving
Trump was involved in anything illegal. Wait. We
same thing I've been saying. You can prove
that there's very clear connections, but I've never
seen the actual, provable evidence that he broke
the law.
It says, however, for MAGA to act as
if there's no there there is just ridiculous.
As we all know, Epstein and Trump were
buds for decades. And, again, I've got the
clip right down below from b Daily, Beast
podcast where he said we were closest friends
for ten years.
And it says, photograph, videotape together. Trump knew
Epstein liked young girls. Epstein had 16 of
Trump's numbers in his black book, and they
continued communicating even after the alleged breakup.
MAGA loves to use my interview with Brad
Edwards as if it exonerates Trump from any
and all wrongdoing.
But as I've said hundreds of times, Edwards
specifically said Trump picked up the phone and
told him info. He didn't testify under oath
or in deposition.
In fact, the in Edwards' book, he explicitly
says that what Trump shared was basically rumors
and that their relationship,
Epstein and Trump, was a lot closer than
he originally thought. It's unfortunate that this issue,
like every other issue in The US, has
become partisan.
Some of us care about exposing everyone involved,
whether their names are Clinton, Trump, or otherwise.
Exactly. Any links down below if you wanna
check it out.
Now Whitney came out today or yesterday, excuse
me, and said, my feeling is is that
now it my feeling is that now it
is safe, in quotes, to release the info
that Epstein was really a sex trafficker on
as a side gig and was mainly an
intelligence asset of Israel and The United States,
a big time financial criminal of on behalf
of transnational
capital. She says, I would argue transnational organized
crime disguised as transnational capital
and an arms trader,
Epstein,
because the people he was helping have stolen
so much of America's wealth
and have taken control over so much of
the government. Exactly.
This is why even admitting the truth,
the the true breadth of the scandal
and operation doesn't even seem to move the
needle. And that goes for damn near every
other topic that's partisan connected right now. Criminals
are in charge, and they run both parties.
They have created the infrastructure for neo feudalism
enforced by technology and are herding us into
the corral.
I'll grab this before I forget. It's exactly
my point on this.
It says opt out of AI digital ID
and the surveillance state that Epstein Associates built
now because we still can. We'll end with
that point in a second. This is my
show I did around this, Pernomos Capital. That's
the the teal overlap with the funding of
the freedom cities in Gaza and prom you
know,
Prosperos.
And it says, so Pernomos Capital and the
rapid transition to a techno feudal state. It's
where this has gone.
But she continues by saying, also, all of
the people who smeared me and
this
smeared me this and last year for pointing
out JD Vance's Peter Thiel connections and why
Thiel is bad and all and, like, Alex
Jones, for example,
also shame me for not trusting in Trump
being should
be also shaming me for not trusting in
Trump should be eating their shirts right now,
but, of course, they're not,
after these recent releases.
You sold the American people, Epstein Associates, as
political saviors, and you should apologize.
They won't.
As Derek says to her comment, Whitney's right.
So many people called her, me, T Lab,
and our and our I am I I
am a colleagues blackpilled around the election for
pointing out the obvious about Trump. Now, by
the way, most of them are now the
ones starting to call this out like they're
the ones breaking the story. That's typically how
this goes. Recognize that many of them are
probably not honestly trying to cover it, just
opportunism. Point it out, like I say, it's
accurate, but recognize that people use the awareness
well past the point, like David Icke calling
out Tucker about geoengineering
and whatever else, to gain your following for
next manipulations.
I'm not gonna say I know for sure.
I I I think Dane being on Tucker's
show is important. I'm glad to see him
there. I think he's got some powerful information,
but it's just interesting to see how these
things come about. On the note of JD
Vance, here at Decentered News did a little
breakdown of this. Here's a short primer on
JD Vance's connections to Epstein, which Whitney Webb
was way ahead of the curve on.
Months ago, former president Donald Trump revealing his
pick for vice president. Senator JD Vance now
his running mate. JD Vance was elected to
the senate in 2022 and went from being
a staunch critic of former president Trump to
one of his strongest allies to now his
vice presidential nominee.
Who is this guy?
I'm actually gonna pause it there just because
I'm realizing I've only got thirty minutes before
I have an interview that's coming up. So
I'm gonna go ahead and wrap up a
couple endpoints here. Well, two points I wanna
conclude before we continue or or, you know,
wrap up in about thirty minutes. Last on
JD Vance. JD Vance's tweet about Jeffrey Epstein's
scandal resurfaces four years later. And, boy, it's
awkward. Right? All these things as usual as
somebody kindly points out in the chat. Right?
All the things that we've been talking about
for quite a long time. Right? The story
for a lot of these things is not
necessarily that we're breaking the story because that's
not the case. These things have been around,
that we were talking about these things years
ago. Now as or in Whitney's case, what
JD Vance was and is well before we
got here.
But this is important simply to point out
that they're willing to tell you whatever they
want you to see. I think that this
is him simply commenting on the the, in
2021
about a an article called the Jeffrey Epstein
case is why people believe in Pizzagate. And
he says, I think about this Matthew Walter
column about once a week once a month,
essentially insinuating that Epstein and Pizzagate, and all
it's all fake news, and everyone's considering conspiracy
theories. Right?
Then he says, remember when we learned that
our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected
to a guy who ran a literal child
sex trafficking ring, and then that guy died
mysteriously in jail, and now we just don't
talk about it? 2021.
Right.
Then he comes out and says, what possible
interest would the US government have in keeping
Epstein's client secret? And we've talked about these
already. The point is just that now it's
actually like, you're getting mainstream momentum to call
out something that they usually don't look. He
said this, and now he's saying this today.
They're lying to you. It's not this is
they all lie to you.
But think about how this is breaking down
in front of the the the people who
never see this kind of stuff.
Massey says in spite of the last ditch
effort by the president to foil the motion
and Johnson's propaganda, the discharge petition that he's
been leading just succeeded. In December, the entire
house of representatives will vote on releasing it.
Now had they not
paused everything for a month, we would have
had this earlier. And still, who knows what's
gonna happen between then and now? But they've
released some through the oversight, but here we
have a you know, the discharge for for
everything I would argue for, you know, what
they're able to that's not going to break.
Well, see, as always,
even if we get this, they'll still probably
find reasons to hide certain information under the
guidance of national security.
This person says community notes from the top
rope.
This person says fire this guy about Massey
and the
Twitter fact check says missing important context. Kurt
previously advocated for the release of the files.
See, I just love that. So people who
were out there going release the files are
now the ones getting called out for not
saying that anymore and now calling for Massey
to be fired even though he wants the
files released like they originally called for.
Just Massey laughs at it. It's just interesting
where we are. Right? People are showing you
who they really are. Just like COVID, don't
forget.
Massey says after months of fighting in the
disparaging Epstein legislation, now that his discharge petition
has succeeded, Johnson says he tried to pass
the law by unanimous consent. He goes, but
if that's so, he should have no problem
voting, yay, next week. Listen to his own
words. I'm I'm gonna skip it for time,
just but the point is, he's out there
saying, of course, I would've done it. Well,
we're gonna find out when he votes yes
or no. We all know where he's actually
at. Ron Robert Barnes and plenty of others,
I would argue, were some of the ones
that were sort of corralling people to support
Trump before the position, and now are the
ones saying they're all lying to you. I'm
glad to see that. People can change their
mind, but I just think it's interesting to
recognize how many people are out there, you
know, kind of whether it's good intention or
not, corralling people into the left right paradigm.
And now when it's
you know, easy to see it, people are
calling out the lie. It's about
being honest about this before it's easy.
Dan Bongino says, congress Massey, congress Massey, when
director Patel and I entered our duty and
our leadership positions in the FBI, we had
our hands full, but we were happy to
be part of the president's team, and we
still are. Despite the multitude of challenges we
faced, one of our first initiatives was to
aggressively pursue a new strategy to investigate January
6, pipe bomb, terror attack. We brought in
new personnel.
The bottom line is he just goes on
to make a big case about how, yes,
our leadership team will be meeting with the
FBI. It's about the case that they seem
to be not commenting on. And what he's
trying to simply say is, like, look, I
called you twice.
This is Massey saying I received troubling letter
from attorney general from from attorney representing the
most recent FBI whistleblower regarding the January 6
pipe bomb investigation.
Just a reminder to Kash Patel.
In case this letter is warranted, federal law
prevents re retaliation against whistleblowers. All of this
is coming out. We talked about this in
a recent show,
which I think is right here.
January 6 pipe bomber.
The point is that they're addressing it. They're
pointing to it, but the reality is nobody
believes them, not even a huge supporter of
Trump. He says, Barnes, they don't realize no
one trusts them anymore. That's what the disastrous
handling of Epstein in nine months of no
result gets you.
Well, it's not just that. It's that they're
liars, and they're constantly caught for lying. Right?
The point is that Dan's just trying to
make it seem like we're doing everything, but
they're not, though. And nope, not even their
supporters believe them, which was the point here.
You can read here what he said. It's
basically just saying that we're we're working on
this and we're getting to that, but this
is the first time they barely even commented
on this.
We'll come back to that point in a
second. Caitlin Johnstone points out, one of the
craziest things happening right now is how there's
been report after report after report showing that
Epstein really was an Israeli intelligence operative. You
know, like anybody in the know of the
conversation was telling you from a long time
ago, whether it was because of Acosta or
Whitney's books and the overlap, it's pretty obvious.
And it says based on publicly available documents
and yet it has no measurable impact on
mainstream media or politics, like everything else, guys.
And she just here's many of the articles
from drop site news,
or there's others DropSite News. I think one
and there there's been many reports that have
come out. She's just highlighting DropSite's work, which
has been excellent.
Jeffrey Epstein helped broker Israeli security agreements with
Mongolia, with in Syria, with it's all over
the place.
And this is Caitlin again. When you realize
what a large scale power broker Epstein was
for Israeli intelligence, you understand why it's entirely
reasonable to suspect that extensive state resources would
be put toward an elaborate plot to murder
him in his prison cell and make it
look like a suicide. This is Democracy Now,
just reporting from Drop Site News about the
work and simply highlighting it as a ten
minute clip. It's worth watching. But just recognize
that the world knows, guys. The world knows
Israel's involved. The world knows that Israel basically
controls Trump's administration and all of the US
government, so it's not confusing to wonder why
it's going the way that it is right
now.
Now to to
go through this pretty quick,
Trump sends a letter to president Herzog of
Israel formally asking him to pardon Netanyahu.
He's doing that right now, calling it a
political unjustified prosecution of a man committing genocide.
Like, they are locked
in, guys. With everything people see, this is
what he's doing. Even Clint Russell comes out
and says, Trump is gonna lose House and
get impeached in 2027, and I'm not gonna
lift a finger to defend him. Still trapped
in that two party paradigm. You did nothing
you promised you did, and, yep, I know.
That's what we were trying to tell you
beforehand. We were trying to get you all
to see that he was lying to you
because you could just like David Icke says,
it wasn't that you now see it. You
could have seen it back then. It was
obvious back then. For whatever reason, many people
chose to blind themselves to what was easily
seen before the selection.
Not to say that we should have voted
for Kamala. The point is they're all lying
to you. But recognize that this is where
it's still going. This is where it's going,
where it is now, where it's going, whether
Democrat or Republican in the next position.
But Trump is
tripling down. Well, you get people like this,
the massive team supports,
sport politics supporters out there. Real MAGA held
the line.
Right? So in your mind, real MAGA are
people that are blindly following Trump regardless of
whether he's a criminal. That's what this is
the line now. People that are blind followers
and people that have integrity or just not
willing to blindly follow people who are being
dishonest.
DC Draino says, as of today, who are
our top three MAGA congressmen?
And then gets an answer that he tries
to ignore, which I find hilarious. But somebody
goes, well, you didn't like the answer? Grock
reiterates it.
And it's some weird skip cut to the
chase. It was acting funny about his ID
or something, who basically said Thomas Massie, Margaret
Taylor Greene, and Tim Burchitt.
Okay, well that's not what he wants anybody
to see because the whole point of masking
this was meant to be the
top three MAGA people are the ones that
are bucking the supposedly mainstream MAGA situation. Because
MAGA means making America great again.
Even Grock could point that out, but all
these team sport politics people are trying to
hide from that reality. And I simply said,
oops. Post it down there.
This person says, you know,
as this plays out and Trump ends up
demolishing the deep state once and for all,
some of you are gonna feel like a
fool for having decided the best course of
action when the fog of war was thick
was to freak out and flip on him.
Deciding that aligning yourself with his enemies was
your best move. I'll leave it up to
you to decide. Is that what we're talking
about? So either you blindly follow him or
you're on the other side? How How about
you're on the side of integrity
and call out both sides of paradigm? See,
people like this cannot think beyond that they're
only left and right. That's the only way
the world works. It's just sad. It's crazy
to me, but there's so many people like
this. They're doubling down to side with Trump
no matter what because the other side's bad.
That's the that is the I hope what
I'm trying to show you or that you're
seeing, that is the minority in the conversation.
It always has been. The the majority of
people are starting to push beyond the team
sport lie.
Gunther Eaglman says, Stephen Miller just confirmed the
White House is listening to Americans who are
barely hanging on from being tortured under Biden
for four years. Oh, is that what's happening?
Not this year of complete struggle, but the
four years before that, that's what they're still
struggling through? This is just desperate, guys. And
And I would argue, yes. It was horrible
under Biden. The point is that you're trying
to just pretend like that's all that matters,
that then, not what's happening now. And he's
simply going, we're listening. We're gonna give you
some cheaper things for Thanksgiving.
The desperation is palpable.
Or pointing back, which we're still doing, to
operatives, hidden globalist operatives inside the Trump administration
are the reason things are going wrong.
Is anyone else getting tired of this fact
free claim being thrown out every time something
goes awry? I certainly am. The Biden crime
family, it's all coming down.
Sure. Arrest them. I'd love to see that.
But Julie Donuts will post this every thirty
seconds for the next six months or however
long.
I'd like to see some action. Most conservatives
are starting to see that they're not doing
anything.
Nobody's getting arrested. And on that note, here
is the follow-up to Kash Patel's false flag
discussion.
October 31.
Briefly,
that's just where we currently are. Same position,
guys.
No. No. No, please, because all we have
so far are are criminal complaints, not actual
indictments.
And on top of that, what we're seeing
are these two people from Dearborn, Michigan, the
argument, I think, being that it's evil Muslims
in Dearborn, Michigan,
who simply were going to shooting ranges and
were on a chat room and spoke about
pumpkin day, as far as I can tell,
again, because they haven't released damn near anything.
Interestingly,
the guy I was pointing to before, the
unnamed 20 year old American citizen, who, by
the way, is currently not being charged with
anything because he's cooperating as a witness and
was detained briefly in the beginning but released
without charges, and seems to be the guy
that was actually the one involved with the
actual ISIS overlap. So suddenly, just like with
Dallas, you've got this one anomaly person who
just in in Dallas, for example, the other
two didn't even know this guy. And now
he's the one that shot somebody and ran
off, and they're like, you're now gonna be
held accountable for being involved with him. Now,
again, that hasn't seemed to flush out either.
These these things seem to be floated with
no real follow through. What I think we're
talking about isn't is a setup like they
do every single time. It says evidence included
gun ranges,
park meetings to avoid detection, ISIS propaganda discussions,
which means they talked about pumpkin day. And
because you have a guy we claim is
ISIS, that's ISIS discussions. Or
so going to a gun range and then
practicing high speed reloads. You mean, like, literally
everybody at a gun range?
So, basically, nothing other than that you claim
those things are bad when they are chatting
with an ISIS guy. And it says reports
of multiple suspects up to five were initial.
Remember that? It turned out six, Kas Patel
said. Except it turns out that only two
of them were actually charged. The rest were
released.
How in the world do you make sense
of that? He made a huge thing about
arresting the network. Remember that?
Bet you I can get that real
quick. Nope.
Oh, there it is. I bet you that's
it.
There it is. An ISIS link Halloween plot
case.
Our teams dismantled multistate ISIS network before they
could strike.
Right.
This was on the November 9. They claimed
they've arrested six people, two in New Jersey,
two in Michigan,
except problem is that they've only actually maintained
two that they beginning with in Michigan. The
rest was all a bunch of hype, it
seems. And they released them. There's no charges.
Gee, I wonder why they're not talking about
that anymore. That massive thing he put out,
and he says, we are doing this for
you. Here's how we protect America. Well, right
so far seems to be a complete false
flag.
But I'll I'll wait to see more information.
January 6 pipe bombing conversation, Thomas Massie still
pushing this out. Based on my questioning of
witnesses reported by Steve Baker and others
and this new 11 page whistleblower disclosure, I
believe management of the FBI has been covering
up or has been grossly incompetent.
This is posted on the eleventh. And all
you get is Bongino saying we're looking at
it.
Cash Patel
focusing on the fact that something mean was
said to somebody or like, this is how
this keeps going if it's even provable in
the first place.
She says, last night, an individual attempted to
confront one of our US attorneys,
destroyed property at our office, then fled the
scene. So knowing what they call like, knowing
that they can literally have somebody brush against
them when they call it a violent attack,
for all we know, that's somebody who literally
protested. And, I mean, something very benign they
turn into some serious crime. You know, like
the sandwich that was a huge deal that
got dismissed from the case because it was
ridiculous. That's That's what that ended up. The
sandwich case was dismissed.
Well, that's what she says. Any violence or
threats against people in federal office will not
be tolerated,
except when you literally do that to people.
I mean, the contradictions are rife.
The point is that this we don't even
know whether this even happened. When they've been
caught lying tremendously. I just told you she's
on the hook right now for, like, back
dating some document to claim that it was
ahead of when it needed to be there,
and she's caught. That's a crime, guys, but
I guarantee nothing will happen.
But this is the attorney Haba says, I
will not be intimidated by radical lunatics.
Well, I sure as hell love to see
something verified. And when it turns out to
be people protesting in front of them and
they make this into a big case where
somebody bumped them or something benign, I'm saying
I'm not saying I know that. I'm saying
that's what their track record has shown. Well,
then you shouldn't be surprised.
But Cash tags onto it and says, the
FBI will lead the hunt against the two
who threatened our brave servants.
Oh, you're so powerful and brave. You're gonna
investigate mean words that were I mean, come
on, guys. This is what you're focusing on?
Yes.
Five times August
says, in regard to Pam Bond, he's saying
it won't be tolerated. He said it will
be tolerated because you're not going to do
anything about it, except post this tweet. You
hold a perfect record for doing nothing about
anything. It's what you do.
I agree.
You might have seen that Kash Patel and
his FBI subpoenaed and essentially shut down archive.com
for a moment, which seems to be all
about the most transparency
ever. Right? The most transparent administration shutting down
your access to archive documents they don't want
you to see. Typical.
Now I'm gonna come into this more in
the next,
let's see.
Will be
tomorrow
to talk about
I I mean, I can't say depending on
what might change by tomorrow,
this may not be the some of the
larger but I really keep wanting to focus
on this. I actually still wanna try to
find more insight into some of these larger
points. But Robert put an excellent article entitled
Israel's anti Muslim Hasbara propaganda and its agenda
to eliminate free speech. It's an excellent article.
It overlaps,
the the point of how they're using this
to shut down speech,
but also the idea that they're trying to
designate the Muslim Brotherhood of terrorist organization, whatever
you think about it, in order to use
that against randomly associated groups that they claim
are then terrorists because they're in some way
overlap with it. The same thing they've done
with Palestinian groups in the past. And it's
just it's an it's an effort to just
shut down,
you know, really create anti Muslim propaganda and
shut down your ability to speak about a
lot of this stuff. It's an excellent article.
I'll include this. This is just Valentina Gomez.
I showed you this the other day. She
literally posted this saying, if something happens to
me, it's the Muslims.
That's how clumsy Zionists are. Like, you just
you just yell out the narrative without even
giving it some tack. Like, that's insanely stupid
and disgusting and bigoted. But it's the Muslims.
They all did it. You know, that's a
Zionist agenda for certain.
Now let's see. We got about fifteen minutes
left. I wanna I wanna finish with some
health focused stuff. Because the real point for
me is that all of this
leads to a lot of different control
points in our lives. One of the most
obvious that I can't decouple from the technocratic
drive is the is the fake Maha movement.
Not the people that believe in Maha, but
the fake government side of it, like the
fake MAGAs as opposed to the people that
believe make America great again.
In this Trump administration, it's continuing to scream
in the wrong direction. It's just we just
need to call it out. Here is RFK
Junior's previous VP when he was actually running
and saying the truth about things. Here's what
she has to say about mRNA shots being
forced on our cattle right now.
And don't forget, guys, as I keep showing
everybody, this is where it was always going.
Trump leans into self amplifying mRNA and makes
it very clear that RNA and food and
every other category is not stopping. But all
the team sport politics people yelled and lied
to everybody else, here she is telling you
it's still happening even on Bannon's show.
We are now on the precipice of being
forced to inject
our cattle with the mRNA vaccine. So just
like we talk about medical freedom
for humans and the desire to not have
mandates telling us what
we have to put in our bodies,
food freedom is an extension of that. We
want the ability to eat meat that isn't,
that full of these inputs.
We'd also like to be fully informed. I
mean, let's talk about the Nuremberg trials, right?
The idea that humans
have a right to be fully informed about
what they're putting into their bodies.
Food freedom is a really big part of
that.
Yeah. I mean, the simple point is just
to is to just
realize that the direction hasn't even slowed down.
Right? So if we're still talking about mRNA
shots, which are there, the current COVID shot
is out there and deployable. The self amplifying
shots are rapidly being deployed and
and made by multiple companies.
Our name food,
or as,
Thomas Massey points out, just a little reminder
that the continuing resolution that they all just
agreed on literally has things for edible plant
vaccines
like we were all trying to tell you,
like Massey was trying to tell you. Well,
now with the game of trying to distract
you from something else or the the shutdown
battle and the immigration, well, that gets slid
in. That's how that works. The real things
are rarely the focal point of discussion, guys.
And so I said, so, apparently, Ozempic, Bill
Gates, fake food, transgenic, edible vaccines, even COVID
shots are maha,
Or is that just what the blind followers
are saying, representing themselves as all of you?
Speak up, conservatives. Show the nation that you
are not what the team sport two party
illusion pretends that you are.
One other point before we get into the
THC.
Right? I mean, is that this is there's
an endless amount of these examples of lying
to you about the direction of where this
is going. We've talked about the the shots.
We've talked about the fit the food. As
as she was pointing out, the mRNA in
cattle. You know? I mean, aren't these all
supposed to be extreme violations of what was
promised? Shouldn't any one of these things be
an absolute record screech? Okay. Are they relying
to well, yeah, that's kinda what's happening with
most people right now. But right I think
what we're what I'm worried about is that
the momentum of the tea of the the
illusion of the majority will be enough to
keep the agenda going. So the answer to
that, in my opinion, would be to get
out there and scream at the top of
your lungs anywhere you can to get enough
attention to the reality that they don't represent
everybody. Just like the government doesn't represent all
Americans, in my opinion, because they have long
since sold us out. But on a health
side of this, guys, the it's wild to
me that they're talking about and Trump has
just signed a ban on THC
in Texas, in the hemp hemp industry. This
is overlapping with Tennessee. I'll probably talk about
this more in the next show. But this
is just old school government control stuff, guys.
Maha is aware of the the benefits of
the THC rather just specifically
cannabinoids
and the overlap to the health industry.
I'll I'll go into this next show, but
this is the federal overlap, the ban that
is gonna threaten Tennessee's fields as well.
We have the USCA now planning to drop
rabies vaccines across the Southeast or the Tennessee,
all sorts of different places.
This is new. This is as of this
is as of last month.
We're still doing that? I mean, this is
just mind blowing to me. It's exactly the
conversation we've had. They're talking about dropping these
edible rabies vaccines, something that I've talked about
more than once.
Edible transmissible
live rabies drabs, even though they claim that
it can't spread, it definitely can. We talked
about this in the show, and it definitely
does spread amongst the animals. This is how
they're designed.
The point
is that it's gonna be dropped from the
air over these areas
in Tennessee, North Carolina, Alabama, Virginia, West Virginia,
Georgia, and Maine and new New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia,
even Massachusetts
already apparently going.
The oral rabies vaccine known as Rabilol v
r
VRG
are contained within plastic sachets and coated with
fish meal so it attracts animals, including your
domesticated pets. And they can eat 15 of
them, and apparently, that's no big deal even
though it really is, and it's super dangerous.
On top of that, guys, just to again,
we will touch on this again. I'm sure
it'll come to come to pass. How many
people had rabies in this country do you
think over the last twenty the the 2024?
Four.
Four confirmed cases of humans, and yet you're
dumping
oral transmissible vaccines over our countries over our
states rather, which is not I mean, not
we'll get into the other parts of that.
That's just not safe for animals.
Or only three thousand eight hundred thirty four
confirmed cases in animals in all of the
country. You realize how minimal that is with
how many animals there are? This is not
a real issue. So ask yourself, what are
they doing? Well, I'll include this tweet, by
the way. I'll just give it a retweet
so it's out there at the top if
you wanna check it out. Where we talk
about the overlap of the GMO conversation.
Right? The conversation of this is obligatory pesticide
spraying in New York City, GM mosquitoes, and
flying vaccinators. Are they all connected? Well, turns
out that they are.
And what's interesting to me, this tweet really
does sum it up where it's right here.
I just simply said, are you aware that
g m mosquitoes are released in California and
Florida are literally an experiment? Are literally an
experimental use permit that's been continued all the
way to this very day? They're releasing these
mosquitoes. Now here's the interesting part of this.
Tetracycline,
to cut the chase if you haven't seen
this, tetracycline
was shown to be a problem. Oxitec con
confidential information, documents released via FOIA that they
knew
very early that fifteen percent of mosquitoes actually
did not die but got stronger. Now the
GM mosquitoes are supposed to be made to
be able to kill off the offspring so
they don't spread. It's supposed to be for
your benefit. Right? Well, it turns out that
because that the traps they were using had
tetracycline,
it caused them to actually be strong enough
to fight it and then spread the ability
to grow beyond it to other species. And
so now you've got resistant
GMO mosquitoes that are stronger than ever,
and that's continued ever since they did this.
Now the crazy part, I found out tetracycline
was the issue. Right? Well, guess what? The
rabies vaccines include. Guess what? The one they're
dropping all over the country include
tetracycline.
Yes. The edible rabies vaccines that are currently
being used, and here's the list of the
names. They have them right down here. It's
right there. Yes. They currently include tetracycline.
That was my question.
Edible rabies vaccines used by the government through
this program
still contain tetracycline.
So doesn't that begin to feel like an
organized effort to literally put things out there
that then cause the environment? I mean, this
is not a joke, guys. It may sound
abstract to you. If you watch the show,
you'll see that these things completely overlap. And
what you've created is a situation where maybe
by design, you've got geomosquitoes
that are possibly
the,
I was gonna just grab one and see
if I could find it real quick. Well,
I guess the flying vaccinators conversation is in
this. Right? So they've got these Bill Gates
overlaps, flying vaccinators, and even for those that
think that that is, oops,
somehow a fake story.
Can't type right now.
Here's science.com.
Researchers turn mosquitoes
into flying vaccinators.
Alright? So now you've got this overlap where
you've got fly these things are put into
the field that are meant to be somehow
one off, die off. They're being allowed to
overlap with this other problem, which is causing
all sorts of environmental issues, hurting domesticated animals,
killing off other species, and then they spray
on top of all of that. And guess
what the obligatory spraying that they spray out
of the back of trucks in your streets
do? The same exact thing.
So altogether, you've got this weird trifecta of
a problem that nobody connects with each other,
and they really do lead to the growth
of the issue. Now
whether they're putting out more vaccinators, whether it's
about, you know, like Catherine's point, the great
poisoning, you can decide what you think that
leads to, what the objective is. Just recognize
whatever the intention,
this is bad for you. And what they're
doing as they still dump these things across
our our states,
whether the individual dropping it even knows, these
things are hurting your environment. They're hurting your
animals. They're actually doing the opposite of what
they claim they're doing.
So I will end with a couple of
clips here toward how this overlaps with the
technocratic control structure that all of this will
lead to. And we'll be seeing you in
the next show. Thank you all for being
here tonight. And I'm I'll be interviewing with
Ricky on,
the ripple thought, ripple effect. I don't know
if it's on tonight. If it is, I'll
I'll see you there. I love you all.
As always, question everything. Come to your own
conclusions. Oh, wait.
I'm gonna play one clip on the way
out,
and I will show you these two.
Catherine Austin Fitts
talking about the control grid. She also points
out, here is how the administration is promoting
programmable money and the digital control grid. Fans
out there hawking hawking
the
control CBDC grid. David Ike, the cult has
no borders. It's one gigantic interconnected club, and
you ain't in it.
Bachelor
showing Alex Karp. Palantir CEO says that his
surveillance state is in The U in The
US would be better than letting China win
the AI race. Right? That's why he keeps
saying, China can't win AI, so let us
control your lives. It'll all work out.
Well, you're smarter than that. Thank you for
tuning in, guys. I'll see you next time.
I think they put Trump in to get
the control grid.
And we have at Solaire, we have a
collection that we update every week of all
the things the administration is doing to build
a control grid. And I have to tell
you, you know, if I had chosen Trump
to get the control grid and I was
gonna grade him on his performance to date,
he gets an a plus plus plus.
He's done a fabulous job.
And I can't imagine another politician who could
have done this much this fast.
So but if you look at what they've
achieved,
I don't think they need Trump anymore.
Now that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid
of him. But
if they wanna get rid of him with
Epstein, they can. It will work.
Yeah. I just don't surprised that, like, to
me, it's quite obvious that Trump is on
the list because they were besties. But if
he's on the list, and he knows, of
course, he would be on the list, why
was he making Epstein so important during his
campaign? Because, of course, it would backfire at
some point. It it's it's doesn't seem logical
for Trump to
to use,
Epstein as a as a as a trump
card in in the campaign.
So I don't know if he was using
a lot in the campaign. I think Kash
Patel was using it a lot, and I
think Dan Boccino was using it a lot.
Well, this is his team was using it.
Right? So and also all his supporters were
vocal about it, and he didn't he didn't
he he could have stopped it
back then already, and now it's too late
to get the genie back in the bottle.
So here's who pushed it, and I didn't
realize this
until recently,
because I was
very early on in saying QAnon was a
hope horn and ridiculous and not to pay
any attention to it. But what I didn't
understand was QAnon made a very big deal
about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning
it all up.
And, you know, basically, the Democrats were engaged
in pedophilia,
and they were at the heart of Epstein,
and Trump was going to secretly clean it
all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge
deal about Epstein.
And,
you know, that is seriously, in my opinion,
and and I say this because I know
many people trapped in it, you know, it's
a cult. It's just
it's just a completely
adult fairy tale. But they believed it. And
so now that he's coming out and saying,
oh, it was a hoax,
you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies
completely in the face of the cult.
So now now we've got a really big
problem, and I
I don't know why he didn't put it
back in the box. I I don't know
why. And it's too late now. I think
especially since Musk is saying he's on the
list. To me, it all seems like a
a a trick to, in the end, get
rid of Trump and then continue with fans
who was already part of the volunteer, and
and Peter Thiel gang anyway.
If if the if the people who run
the system
want Trump out,
they can use Epstein to do it. It
will work.