It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Help your own people. Help your own people.
Stay and join.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 11/09/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Some pretty
interesting discussions. Some interesting
individual stories we're gonna be covering today. I
definitely
most of which we've covered over the years.
January 6, for example, come becoming a admit
it's never stopped being an interesting story. Never
I mean, obviously, the reality of the story
for those outside of the partisanship
is pretty clear, I would argue. Usually, the
partisanship's sort of blocking one part of the
story. You never really get in the full
picture in the partisan team game. But definitely
an important follow-up around the pipe bomb conversation,
at least as according to Blaise's
report
and Thomas Massie kind of really making it
you know, getting attention within the discussion.
You guys know this story. We've talked about
it more than once, but it's interesting to
see, really,
the way that I see this fitting into
the conversation today is how the Donald Trump
administration is handling it. And I would argue
the most important point for me, because, you
know, my opinion, and I think it's pretty
clear, I think the US government is an
entity. Not that your, you know, Trump administration
versus the Biden administration is really just an
entity that is using the paradigm to keep
you in place. You can disagree with me.
I hope you will if you do so,
I hope you will take the time to
look into my arguments, but it's an opinion.
We all can look at what we're seeing.
But I think the why that's important is
that with this
Trump administration aspect and Kash Patel and the
FBI and whether or not they're doing anything
about it.
In this moment, because I think it's important
to reach the conservatives that need to see,
in my opinion, that they're not actually doing
what they claim. But, hopefully, in the bigger
picture, both left and right, people can recognize
that we've been doing this for multiple administrations,
and it never seems to be different. They're
lying to you and they're trying to get
what you know, one everything they can get
get away with and keep you looking at
the partisan issues as as as often as
they can. So it's with the way that
they're handling this shows you, I think, that
there's, like I've been showing with the rest
and we'll briefly talk about, that there's really
no indication that anybody
is gonna go to jail. And I hope
they do,
yeah, on both sides, but we'll just gotta
start somewhere, and I certainly hope that they
do. I just don't think that's what's going
to happen.
So we will talk about that. I'm gonna
start with some points about
Pfizer COVID nineteen shots in kind of the
com in in the
Ozempic part of the conversation, and I'm really
gonna point to that. It's been, you know,
discussed. It's a very relevant point, but it's
very, very, very in the conversation. And I
wanna give you some points on where I
see that fitting in, but also just the
absurdity of that being Maha.
You know, the idea that we're even even
I mean, as far as I can tell,
nobody inside the Real Make America Healthy Again
movement is is even pretending
that a pharmaceutical shot is the healthy direction
in any context. Whether or not that might
alleviate other problems, that is the mantra of
big pharma.
I don't know why they would be backing
that up, but we'll go through why that's
not really that different when you understand. But
we're gonna talk about some health parts around
food that I think are very relevant.
Steve has had on Slim a bunch of
times on a wake up. I need to
reach out to him to get I wanna
get more into this from his perspective on
the local,
not just the regulation part of it, but
as he talked about the
infrastructure, the control they have on that, and
the ability rather the lack of ability from
a a regular farmer
to make any money, let alone succeed
when stifled
for the interest of larger companies. And that's
what this current administration is doing the same.
I wanna go through why that's very important.
We'll touch on the SNAP benefits we haven't
talked about
as I see it related to this larger
point, again, at people being deceived while it's
really happening.
And we'll get into January 6, as I
said, and how that overlaps with what the
FBI is currently seemingly focused on, which some
more updates on the Michigan FBI, what I
see as a very clearly manufactured plot.
We'll go through what continues to be a
very flimsy case from my perspective. I could
definitely be wrong. We have they're holding back
information about this.
I mean, they always do.
But it's really clear to me, my opinion,
of what's happening with the FBI and cash.
He knows that even his own team
is combing through everything he's doing, and we
should be. We should do that all the
time. And he's worried, I think, that people
are gonna see through. And that's just my
opinion, and I think what we're watching right
now is an effort to basically put out
as little information as possible in hopes that
you will not expose what's happening. That's the
way I'm reading this. But we'll go through
the details yet again. Seems to be built
on one element of it like we talked
about and not really the two people they're
aiming at. We'll go through it together.
And
finally, a major part that I think is
important today,
the two party illusion. How long have we
talked about this on this show?
And I'm gonna continue to because I can
as I've said, I don't know, my entire
career, the two party illusion,
the is is the linchpin. It it is
the it is the like, there's plenty of
other things that keep people manipulated. But with
that one thing, if we could remove that
from the conversation,
I think we would see a dramatic change
very quickly.
Now that's not to say that there's not
conservatives and and liberals and whatever else you
think you are. People have their ideas, and
people who are either of their own mind
can think those things or because they're taken
by the party. People can believe what they
want. The point is, from the government's perspective,
those don't really exist. And I mean from
the the the
higher level controlling factions. There are people within
congress I don't even think are truly in
the know, my opinion. My point is they
can believe those things too. But even they,
at the end of the day, will ignore
the division when it's in their interest to
work together at the expense of you. Our
own history shows you this. It's obvious as
anything in the conversation. The point is today,
I, in my entire career doing this, have
never seen the two party illusion as vulnerable
as it is right now. We'll go over
the the statements Candace Owen just said about
Trump and a lot of conservatives
beginning to make this clear. Now this is
not just happening today. I have been pointing
this out for a year, and I mean,
like, for a lot longer than that. But
I mean the the obvious. COVID nineteen, I
thought it was clear then. Post Trump's next
this current administration,
you guys watch this show. I've been trying
to call attention to the reality of the
imploding two party. They're losing control over the
average American opinion.
I don't know why that's not I mean,
I I do think it's clear just because
sort of like the
every other conversation is real immigration. I also
have the mind that most people see it.
They're just most people are just not represented
in the game that's being played today. The
people online, it doesn't represent people anymore. The
left right paradigm does not represent most Americans.
That's what I believe. And I think today,
with Candace beginning to make these statements and
where it's going, this is just starting to
become mass adoption or rather mass awareness of
what has always been happening. Now you could
argue that's an effort to stifle or sort
of, you know, like always, somebody can come
out, jump ahead, and call the thing out
in order to stifle it and stop it
from happening. I don't trust any of these
people. But at the end of the day,
I point to what she's saying because I'm
glad it's being said. And and I hope
that people can recognize this and not just
fall for whatever trap comes next if that's
what's happening.
Recognize what the two party illusion does. Recognize
what Trump is doing is really no different
than what Biden was doing. It's a lot
of narrative and a lot of continuation of
the same agenda. And until we stop falling
for that,
we will never even be able to change
anything else. That's the way I've been I
mean, I haven't been doing this,
I don't know, two decades, really. At the
end of the day, there are people out
there well, I guess, maybe not in earnest.
Like, I've been doing this my life, but
this will say a decade in this show.
There are people out there who've been doing
this for thirty years, their entire lives.
Been similarly saying things the same way. The
question is why now? What's different and what's
changing?
I could go off for a long time
about that, but I'm asking you to think
about what that may be. Reflect in your
life and look around yourself and think what
has changed. What's different in the world right
now? I think you will be able to
identify it pretty quickly.
Let's start with a shout out to the
recent show we just had that I really
hope you'll take take the time to watch.
You know, I really start I'm really up
been enjoying these IMA panels the the entire
time. Really, you know, proud to be part
of it, and I'm glad we started it.
But this one, I really just enjoyed. I
thought it was a really flowing, kind of
just random you know, and we're just very
casual with each other. Like, we you'll have
a good laugh at the way we start.
Good conversation. And this was about digital ID
in general and, as I said, the linchpin
of the technocratic control grid. Same point, but
in regard to the technocratic change, the digital
ID is the without that one point, I
don't believe they're it's they're capable of doing
what they want to accomplish.
That's not to say they won't find a
workaround in the future. The point is right
now, without everyone adopting and accepting or allow
allowing them to force you into digital ID,
I don't believe they're capable of doing what
they wanna accomplish right now. So stand up.
Recognize what this means. Recognize where this is
going. Even if they have the best of
intentions, this creates a world, by the way,
that we're all fighting. You know? Like, we'll
owe nothing and be happy. And, by the
way, which is why I said that, let's
not let's overlap this with what Trump is
talking about today, which we'll get to in
the earlier segments here.
Fifty year mortgages and all, you know,
universal basic income. Okay. These are the same
things.
The exact same things. As Catherine Austin Fitts
points out in a recent interview, Donald Trump
is the most anti capitalist president in history
in her opinion,
putting out a lot of communist socialist efforts.
I mean, the point is they're all building
in this direction. But this show is entertaining
and also very informative, and I think it's
a good the real the one of the
main things that come through for me,
we need to start defining individually, myself, all
of us, where our lines are for this.
Right? What's the line? Not waiting until it's
you know, you're being given a choice between
your livelihood and your thing that day. Like,
consider right now what that line may be.
What will I what am I willing to
give up? Will I give my biometrics? Will
I sign over my face print to join
Twitter? You know, what will you give up?
And try to define those now. It's a
personal thing. It's not meant for everyone else
to criticize and just it's about you and
our individual choices. I try to show you
guys what I'm going through, whether Grok or
anything else with this battle. You know? But
the point is we should individually try to
find that line so we're ready for when
that choice comes because it's coming.
Now on some
health overlapping points,
well, this was just the first point that
I wanna include that has we're gonna get
into some different
false information that we've been breaking down our
entire career. The this one is just a
point that overlaps for everything. Didn't want you
to miss it. We'll talk more about this
in the next show.
From The Guardian. Surgeon antisemitism investigations at US
universities after October 7 attack, data shows, of
course, meaning that it's, you know, all of
a sudden, it just exploded in in
not that it was there as this article
shows, but that the investigation, the discussion,
the reports went wild. And just to cut
to the chase, please read the article. Zachary
Foster points out only one,
one
of a 102 anti semitism investigations
at The US universities over the past two
years
were unrelated to criticism of Israel.
Meaning that if you really wanna break it
down, only one of those cases could be
considered actual, I hate those people because they're
Jewish. Maybe there's an overlap on the other
102. The point is that every other one
of them were about Israel's doing bad things.
Israel's breaking the law. Israel's committing a genocide.
Israel's government x, y, and z. Read it
for yourself.
It's it this is we are in a
very dangerous moment. We're powerful entities, whether Zionist
lobby, big pharma, whatever you wanna discuss,
or or and it I mean, I literally
mean that in a broad sense. We are
being sold out to the highest bidder in
this country. This country is falling apart. The
government is selling us out. It's been going
on for a long time, but this feels
like a fire sale right now to me.
And this is just simply showing you that
we are, as the people of this country,
are being manipulated by whatever force decides to
spend the most money or the most influence,
and our media and our government seem to
just let it happen.
We were lied to, in case you missed
the point, lied to about all the different
Columbia protests and all the different stuff they
were manufacturing, which we proved on this show
many, many times. Just one more follow-up. We'll
get into some same kind of points on
COVID nineteen right now. Now in case you
missed this, doctor Mercola,
peer reviewed study finds COVID nineteen vaccines, in
quotes, because they're not vaccines, linked to 63
serious brain and spinal cord adverse events. This
happens constantly. This is not sixty three to,
you know, now making sixty four. We're talking
about a mountain of these. This is sixty
three new on top of everything else. Serious
brain and spinal cord adverse events that they're
linking to these shots, the same COVID shot
that Donald Trump is still still giving you
despite all the claims, the lies, the narratives.
Nope. There's your there's your twenty twenty five,
twenty twenty six COVID nineteen vaccine formulation from
Pfizer and BioNTech Comirnaty. You know, the Pfizer
that Trump's making multiple deals with. You know,
winning. You know, hashtag winning.
MRNA, comorbidity, whole thing.
So this is just to add to that,
and this is about specifically the mRNA lipid
nanoparticle spike protein. No. The spike injections.
Exactly what they're doing with Stargate, exactly what
they're doing with the self amplifying shots, exactly
what they're doing in general.
That's the point. I just it blows me
away that that's not the the end all
be all. It's over, they lie, which is
kind of happening today, but just weirdly not
in this conversation. I'm glad the Israel point
seems to be in the breaking point.
But this is horrendous,
and they're still doing this. And this is
you can read this for yourself. Here's the
actual study. And it simply says,
and the title is COVID nineteen mRNA vaccinations,
implications for the central nervous system. Now I
wanna point out quickly the reason there's so
many different connected points, and this is not
just random correlative or rather, you know, correlation.
These are they're links to these overlaps like
we've seen with myocarditis. They also by the
way, we got kicked off YouTube for making
that point. Funny how that's one of the
most proven points in the conversation, and we're
the one account they still won't let back
on. How funny is that? This is it's
because we're talking about a genetically modified, like,
a gene therapy dynamic, and so this is
causing your body to freak out. So if
you already have weird genetic issues or other
things, this kind of thing could cause these
things to go haywire or cause immunosuppressive or
immunosuppressive, all sorts of crazy things. This is
just continuing to show you this. And it
says, all safety signals reported are concerning and
support an immediate
global ban on COVID nineteen vaccine program.
Not just the one or the other, the
whole damn thing. And guess who's doing that
or rather not doing that? Donald Trump,
which Biden was doing it too. But in
case you somehow think he's uniquely different than
all this, it's just a bunch of narrative.
Now we're comparing the results to the influenza
vaccine, which in of itself has problems. And
by the way,
we hold you remember we've got not to
get pulled into this conversation. There's so many
ways to go in this. But the point,
just to make it clear really quickly, is
that the overlapping information
was her was, you know trying to grab
it. This wouldn't let me highlight earlier.
Categorized a safety signal when compared to events
after COVID nineteen vaccinations to all vaccines
combined.
Just take a second and think about that.
39 events categorized.
So compared to all other vaccines combined, this
is just a dangerous thing. I don't need
to convince you guys of this. This the
COVID nineteen shots that are still being used
are deadly.
Here's another example of something we got lied
to during COVID nineteen, which, by the way,
the Trump administration are still actively using in
all sorts of context. The PCR test, a
calibration of nucleic acid,
by antibody test, PCR, in Germany, the course
of SARS CoV-two infections estimated. Now you know
where this goes. We've talked about this ad
nauseam. We you know all of this because
we covered it endlessly. You have every reason
to question everything you're told about vaccines, var
vac variants, vaccines, masks, and PCR tests 2023.
I'll give you a tag, just a general,
for all the many different PCR related content
that we put out. I'll make sure to
include the very important thing that should have
changed the conversation from day one that New
York Times wrote in 2007 called quick faith
and quick test leads to epidemic that wasn't.
Literally showing you that PCR test used exactly
like they ended up doing it would lead
to a fake epidemic. What do you know?
I honestly think this was like, oh, okay.
That's how we're gonna use that.
Look. It's not even that's wild to think
that's how simple this can be. Here's a
and here's actually a show we did on
it too.
Now
that says that in Germany, a consortium of
author authority accredited laboratories
covered approximately
ninety percent of all
the what they call SARS CoV-two PCR test,
COVID nineteen
test during COVID nineteen, specifically between 2020 and
2023.
And they likewise conducted serological mass tests for
antibodies
regarding, specifically,
COVID nineteen.
Now it says specifically we show that scaling
and shifting the cumulative
sum of previous PCR positive fractions
effectively reproduces the time course of the IgG
positive fraction. The value of point one four
found for the fitted,
what I messed up my place, for the
fitted scaling parameter means that only fourteen percent
of those who were tested PCR positively actually
became infected with whatever they called SARS CoV-two.
This parameter fit further implies that a quarter,
one fourth of the entire German population had
already carried antibodies to what they say they
needed because of these shots or from these
shots, which rarely made the case anyway, from
natural infections in their blood at the turn
of the year from twenty twenty to twenty
twenty one. We showed you this from the
beginning. The data showed that in the beginning
of whatever they called COVID nineteen, that 2019
to 2020, most countries already had a huge
portion of natural immunity because of other things,
because it wasn't even what we were dealing
with. This just continues to show you that
at best, I think it was ten percent.
I'll read the the conclusion as well.
Ten to fourteen percent were actually people that
were maybe even like, not that they ended
up getting sick, but they were the ones
that could be proven to have actually had
something,
not the or are able to get people
infected. Fourteen percent, ten to fourteen. Second, it
says well, the first part says, again, the
principal finding from our analysis, only fourteen percent
and possibly even fewer, down to ten percent,
of individuals identified to have had SARS CoV-two
via PCR were actually infected, meaning they didn't
even have it. Meaning,
the vast majority, over seventy five percent of
people, didn't have anything and they were told
they did, Or rather, at the very least,
didn't have what they said was cause SARS
CoV-two.
And it says, as evidenced by detectable
antibodies.
Second and, guys, we knew this in the
middle of 2021, by the way, and we
got shouted down by all the people. And
but during Trump's administration, during the second administration
now, they're doing the same things. And Biden,
it's not a left right paradigm thing.
Second, the proportion of the German population with
the detectable immune response
was already substantial
by the 2020.
That was the same point. You know? They
already had these things, preexisting from before. Maybe
it was MERS, COH, or maybe it wasn't
even there. Maybe it's all a lie. The
point is, at the end of the day,
they didn't need what they said they did.
And even if you wanna call this arguing
from within their narrative, right, the point being
is maybe you believe none of this is
real. The point is still, nonetheless, the science
they're telling you to trust is now telling
you they didn't need it to begin with.
You work it however you like. And this
is approximately one quarter of the population carry
those antibodies at that point,
following a trajectory determined almost exclusively by natural
infections.
At the 2021,
part practically, the whole German population could be
considered positive.
Demeaning, they didn't they almost everybody at that
point, which, by the way, was the highest
push for shots in 2021,
and they all had what they claimed they
needed to begin with. Again, maybe that's not
even what they needed. That's not the point,
though. The point is what they said you
needed, they already had. On top of that,
over about ninety percent, give or take, of
the people
weren't even infected when they said they were
anyway.
And I think of all the grandmothers and
families that suffered and got isolated, died, suffered
because of any number of treatments, they weren't
even sick. And that's and let's also overlap
that with the reality that the vast majority,
ninety percent gosh. I remember what that was
now. I could probably grab it. I don't
wanna take the time.
It was,
that won't come up.
Oh, look at that. Oh, that's the wrong
one.
Nope. Oh, well. I can't I I'm not
gonna look for it now. But the point
was, you guys remember, the ionitis group and
their research that came out, and it's still
the standing body of evidence that nobody's challenged,
which is that this was less than the
flu from day one. Over ninety percent of
the population
was at less risk than the flu from
the very beginning, and it only got less
concerning as they told you. We we relied
to from day one, and this is this
is
plainly evident. You can prove this with the
very science they tell you to trust, and
yet we can't, as a society, like, as
a central mainstream, including the mainstream alternative media,
actually acknowledge that. What you get from a
lot of people in the mainstream alternative is
a bunch of kinda weird half narratives because
now Trump seems to support the shot. They
don't wanna really dive into it too deep.
This evidence based and representative serological signal was
disregarded,
the study finds, peer reviewed, in favor of
relying on the weekly
absolute number of positive PCR tests. And what
did we say? What did Carrie Mueller say?
That's not how that's nobody
cared. Oh, you're a conspiracy. No. Are you
a doctor? Are you a scientist? No. Turns
out we were right, though. Not because we
guessed, but because we were looking at the
very facts that you were supposed to be
looking at to begin with. It says unequivocally,
the definition of incident yields a scientifically
meaningless figure in the context of infection dynamics
as it depends entirely on the arbitrary
or imposed
number of PCR tests performed. Meaning right there,
they could increase the amount of tests given
and then use that very stat to say,
look at how bad everything is, which is
exactly what they did.
Is it therefore it it it is therefore
not an objective indicator of
epidemic I can't even speak for some reason.
Just read that right now. Epidemiological
reality,
but an administratively imposed figure,
more reflective of political will
than scientific rigor. My god. Where were these
writers for scientific studies in the midst of
all of this who are watering down all
their findings to not get censored? Oh, that's
why they did it. This is from Germany,
which had a lot of pushback in this.
The point is simple, guys. They lied to
you. They lied to all of us, but
we knew that already. You knew it on
the show. The question is, will this get
in front of the people that need to
see it today?
Probably largely Democrats.
By the end of the day, people need
to see this. Help people see it. Don't
call anybody out. Don't make call names that,
you know, people that might want to acknowledge
the truth. Get it in front of them.
Let them look at it. The point
is that this was a manufactured illusion just
like the epidemic that wasn't. Right? So exactly
the way that this played out, it ultimately
was used that way. I genuinely think that
was a plan.
Political will,
giving more tests to manipulate everybody.
Now consider what's happening today.
Right? Oh, and I'll include Arna Burkhart interview,
Taylor Hudak, revealing the great danger of mRNA
vaccines.
You know, had this had this interview been
on, like, any other partisan platform, this would
be, you know, central viewing for literally everybody
forever for COVID nineteen, and it still hopefully
will be. The point is if Tucker or
Candace or anybody, even a fraction of their
inside partisan side, had even pointed to this
platform. This is this is easily the most
important interview in the entire conversation. I would
say that no matter where it came from.
Because of Arna Burkhart, because of Taylor Hudak.
She put all the work into this. We
simply funded it. The point is that she
deserves all the credit for this, and it
is outstanding
and will change your mind. He's you you
you should check it out if you haven't
seen it. Now let's not forget, again, with
all that, that Donald Trump's administration is now
still giving COVID nineteen shots. And this is
the new 2025
updated COVID nineteen shot. I just don't know
how that makes sense with what everyone says
is happening right now. It doesn't because they're
lying. They're going off what the team says,
not what the facts are, right, as always.
And self amplifying shots is what they're working
on. Now, before we go past that, let's
talk about this weird little in this overlap.
This is what MJ Truth Ultra saying taxpayers
will fund Medicare, Medicaid coverage of
GLP one drugs like Ozempic.
Great. Because, you know, it's healthy to take
injections to lower your weight. Right? I mean,
guys, this is insulting to anybody who has
any understanding. RFK Junior knows well that this
is the last thing. Maybe that's why he
rushed out of the room when something happened.
We'll we'll get to that. But it says,
Maha movement was vehemently against injecting big pharma
weight loss into Americans. What happened? Well, you
see, what are you talking about? What happened?
They are not the Maha movement. You guys
are in the world. These people are politicians.
These are suits. They don't care about you.
They say it's amazing that either these partisan
mainstream alternative players don't care to think about
that or they only see it on the
left side of it. I don't understand. Or
they just don't care, and they're just acting
like they're the baffled one in the middle
of it all when their team's burning it
out in front of them. I said, what
happened is they lied to you, as they
all do. The real question is whether conservatives
will stand by them despite repeated lies and
sellouts. I guess we'll find out, MJ Truth
Ultra, as soon as they go to the
next store and go, rah rah, winning. Drink
team you know, this is insulting. Here's what
he said about this, and this weirdly is
a clip that got cut out
rather like, you know, the point is this
isn't included in the part where the person
passes out. I find that interesting. Not exactly
the same moment, but I find it interesting
on the list that that's not included in
that part of the conversation. Here's what he
said. Significantly
Medicare and Medicaid will finally cover the cost
of these weight loss drugs for millions
of patients suffering from obesity.
Really quickly, think about how dumb it is
to argue that you're even though it seems
the most of the snap,
not a huge majority, but seems that most
of them seem to be overlap with the
republican states, the point is that
you're talking about that being unnecessary. We'll get
to why you're now stopping that yet again,
but then arguing that this can be paid
for. Right? We'll fund from the government through
Medicaid, Medicare fat drugs, you know, injections to
lower your weight, which are just insanely dangerous
on top of everything else we're talking about,
but that's okay. Why? Because that seems to
be something they all just it's a team
thing. You know? It's it's even though you're
challenging your own side without no. The point
is the narrative is somehow that only Democrats
are the ones using government resources. It's just
not even true. We'll get to that point
in a second. But Ozempic. Right? Like, that
makes any sense to anybody who's actually carrying
away people's health. Health. Co pays for Medicare
patients will be as low as
$50.
This is
tremendous savings. I mean, now you're talking about
from $1,350
to $50.
Great. So you could pay $50 to take
a shot that they claim will lower your
rate and cause 75 other problems. Now, like,
I'm being hyperbolic. I don't I'm not an
expert in the medical field. But what I
know is any of these things will always
come with their side effects and that's how
big pharma works. And so then you get
more drugs to take the side effects on,
which then cause more side effects. It's an
old story.
But that's why this works for the team
because you give them something, and we claim
we're helping you. And all you're doing is
becoming lifelong patients to big pharma.
This is tremendous news for the American seniors,
and you all remember when I had one
eighth of 1% for the year. I got
one eighth of and I was so thrilled.
But now we're cutting it a thousand percent
to a 100%.
Me.
I did this and I'm great. I'm so
great. I mean, just nonstop.
That's not a I hate Trump thing. I
think they're all ridiculous. Biden, Trump, they're the
same thing to me. But the fact that
this guy just can't ever like, you it's
just funny. Like, he seems like it's always
about how he did something for you as
opposed to just going, look at what we
did. It's a team. Because I'm a leader.
We all took a part.
He's a bad leader. The point though is,
guys, this is and he says for for
elderly.
This is for the American seniors and American
seniors? What are they talking about? Just because
it's a drug, therefore it's for seniors?
Ozempic for seniors?
They're tapping into talking points, guys. I mean,
you should be embarrassed
that this is something that people think represents
you.
Now I thought this was hilarious. X 23
report, what I haven't seen in a while,
who's still apparently a blind Trump supporter,
says, here's a video of the Ozempic executive
fainting in front of Trump.
Do you see why they're called fake news?
Now here's the picture we use today because
it's a very weird picture, and it is
not edited. He's literally posing for the shots
while the guys over there collapse. Now here's
what's funny to me. The way they edits
this is to it's an effort to try
to make it seem like he didn't do
exactly that. He did, and I'll make it
very clear if you go through, pausing and
holding a whole clip. He looks at the
guy, which is just as weird, by the
way, whether he's facing the camera or looking
at the ground. It's a weird response, but,
you know, I I'm also gonna add to
the side of that that he's the president
of The United States. Wasn't he gonna jump
down there and start giving somebody CPR? It's
not his place. He's probably not even over.
So it's a middle point. But I find
it funny that people are so desperate to,
you know, slight to, you know, give you
the lens to see it the way they
want you to see it, that they'll just
do something like this. Now the point in
all of this is on top of that
funny overlap is that this guy,
the Ozempic
executive,
passes out in the middle of this whole
presentation,
and RFK weirdly slinks from the room. Now
I don't know if that was connected. It's
hard to know for sure, but it's weird.
The timing is very weird because RFK and
the health and all Ozempic. I mean, RFK
is not gonna tell you this stuff is
best for you before Charles Trump's administration. He
would have told you why this should never
be taken, and here we are. It's weird.
Right? But on top of that, just the
overlap of what about the COVID nineteen shots?
Are we just pretending like that's not an
also possible thing? All these mainstream people could
be collapsing from shots still, couldn't they? It's
just funny how the timing just changes the
way we view things. Just worth considering. Here's
the clip.
Science and creating high value jobs.
But today, we
oh, are you okay?
Gordon, you okay?
Now remember, guys, that's not normal. Before COVID
nineteen, that didn't happen.
Like, it happened. Right? There were occasions where
people but not like the amount of people
on news broadcast and playing sports in the
middle of the White House press briefings or,
you know, just you know as well as
I. Now that we have, you know, defibrillators
every 30 feet in every school, like, it's
clearly not normal. Something changed, and we all
know that. It's just interesting to think about
that in this context and now maybe adding
new things. My opinion has always been that
it was never just one thing. It was
never just the COVID shot. That was a
catalyst, yes, and it did, I would argue,
largely responsible for what that thing was. But
we have been overwhelmed with things that have
caused this and I think
synergistically hurt us in a very obvious way
at one moment, you know, peak moment. This
is just possibly overlap. But, oh, who knows?
Maybe he's taken Ozempic and that's why he
passed out. You can't know for sure. Everyone
wants to assume. I just don't find it
interesting overlap.
So he's okay. Trump's standing there looking at
him. Right? You can see with his his
face,
which, you know, I don't know. It's it's
I I don't know. I feel like maybe
something went a little more emotion, but, yeah,
I'm not gonna judge. Who knows whether he's,
oh, they got it. They're doing their thing.
Press. Press. Press. Press. Press. Press. Press.
But he's out. I don't know why they
lift his feet up, though. Am I am
I am I out of date on the
medical procedures? Why is this why are his
feet in the air? Tell me I'm honestly
asking. I don't know because even CPR has
changed. Once before, it used to be breathing
and pumping, and now, apparently, it's just pumping.
I mean, it's weird. So tell me actually
on the side note why is they lifted
his feet up. Cameras.
We're done rolling the cameras.
Okay. So that was they start taking pictures.
He cuts right there for obvious reasons because
Trump turns and gives them a photo shoot.
I mean, that's the part that I find
very weird. You're in the middle of this
guy literally possibly dying and you turn and
give a front facing photo shoot for the
people in your desk. It's not it's an
odd thing to do. And you can see
why he cut it right there. Because he
starts to turn and they all start snapping.
Oop. Cut.
Now it's back to the other part before
he did that.
Now he stands up. That's not that didn't
just happen again. That's cutting it back to
the beginning. Three he cuts it again right
there to make it look like it's longer.
These people are very deliberate. Yeah. Right there.
Watch. Cut. Right there.
That's,
that's
Okay.
Cameras. That's the part you just saw. It's
about it's about a three four second thing.
So he turns
I'm a first guy. And he start taking
pictures.
Okay. So let me ask you something. Reflecting
on this post,
how is that even fake news? What are
we talking about? Oh, here's the guy he's
pointing to. Now, again, I think they are.
All the corporate media, mainstream alternative, a lot
of the people doing the same thing you're
doing are very much manipulative and fake all
the time. But this person says, who I'm
not who is Harry Sisson again? I forget.
But he says, someone passed out in front
of Donald Trump in the Oval Office, and
this is how he reacted. A photo that
perfectly encapsulated who he is via Andrew Hernick
Getty. No. Am I what am I missing?
You mean so if he had taken the
picture with him facing the other direction, that
would have been honest and this was not?
You know, see what I mean? Like, this
is just desperate team sport politics. Both sides
doing it. Right? It's just pathetic, but this
is way I just found that was interesting.
That wouldn't have been brought up if we
weren't talking about Ozempic and the overlap of
all of it, but I just thought that
was very telling. But the Ozempic part of
all of it, guys, is clearly
almost a spit almost a slap in your
face. It is insulting to anybody who actually
believes in what they were selling to begin
with.
Thomas Massie says, just a reminder, both the
Republican,
continuing resolution and the Democrat alternative will continue
funding
transgenic
edible plant vaccines.
See, when you just cut through all of
the nonsense and get beyond all of the
talking points and the main all of the
back forth lying theater,
you can cut through it like this. That
should matter above a lot of things.
Both sides
are literally continuing to fund putting vaccinations
inside of your food. That's not a secret.
It's not a joke. It's not a conspiracy
theory. In 2023, he says, I unanimously passed
an amendment defunding them. But you and a
party, Mike Johnson,
discarded
the underlying appropriation bill for the omnibus bill.
Here we are.
One team, guys, and they're all fighting against
you. If you could just take a breath
and recognize that these people are not fighting
for what you want, unless what you want
is Trump to win.
That or, like, just claim he's winning or
whatever the side game it is you're playing.
This is alarming to me. And as I
said, so apparently Ozempic, Bill Gates fake food,
transgenic edible vaccines, and even now COVID shots,
the new one he's putting out, are are
Maha apparently. Or
is that just what the blind followers are
screaming with millions of followers on Twitter?
Right? Speak up, conservatives.
Genuine, real, honest conservatives out there. Speak up.
Show the nation that you are not what
the two party illusion pretends you are. I
think that's a very important point for today.
Left or right,
I don't I don't think they're represented properly.
I think more people are seeing this than
anything else.
Aaron Day says Trump, Maha, are implementing now
in my mind, that means the the administration,
not the people, are implementing complete top down
technocratic medicine.
Get out now while you can. Operation Stargate,
Palantir Health, complete AI surveillance, including genetic information,
health scores,
rationing based on AI. I mean, these are
very public points they're making, guys. It's not
a joke, he says. We've been completely rubbed.
I completely agree. And that is sort of
what's coming out today.
He says dump all health insurance, put your
assets in medical trust, use medical tourism. That's
all his points, his opinions. Take that for
what you will.
Here's what Trump said. I'm recommending to the
senate Republicans that the hundreds of billions of
dollars currently being sent
to money sucking insurance companies
in order to save, excuse me,
the bad health care provided by Obamacare.
Right? It's always, Democrats bad, so just whatever
I say next is what you should all
agree with. He says, be be and I'm
I think they're all bad. It says, be
sent directly to the people so that they
can purchase their own much better health care.
Now, I don't disagree with the idea of
of a free you know, a dynamic where
people can choose what they want. Obviously, that's
liberty.
But what the problem is is that you
they love to say things like that and
then present you with something that is worse
than before and argue, you know, here's two
choices you can frick from and you're just
trapped in the same problem. Now, that's just
a broad analogy. It doesn't even fit everything
that's happening. My point is that I don't
believe they're actually going to give you a
free choice for the free market. That never
happens, especially when they're trying to force their
things on you, which they are. You can
see it plain as day.
He says, in other words, take from the
big bad insurance companies and give it to
the people and terminate per dollar spent the
worst health care anywhere in the world, Obamacare.
Unrelated. We must still terminate the filibuster.
That that thing too. It's not about Obamacare
or one or the other. It's about the
the corporations that have influenced and controlled the
outcome of policy in this country, whether through
lobbying or anything else for their benefit. I
mean, if you can't understand that Big Pharma
and Pfizer and BlackRock and everything else that's,
like, literally holding hands with Trump right now
is exactly what he's pointing to, saying that
we're gonna stop. They're on the they're on
the same team for what they're transitioning into.
This is not gonna be in your interest.
I agree with Aaron, guys. This is going
in the wrong direction,
and we're being played.
That and on that note, to make this
even more clear with transgenic vaccines, we just
talked about this. Trump's admin, when saying they
were ending them, is actually leaning into self
amplifying shots.
Amplitude
Therapeutics, Arcturus,
making self amplifying COVID nineteen flu, bird flu,
all sorts of things currently being worked on.
They're already got the community shot out from
Pfizer. On top of that, under the guise
of ending mRNA, and they also push the
idea of RNA in food. If you read,
from the show,
RFK Jr's post, it was very clear. We
or only we claimed we're stopping the COVID
shot thing. We weren't even doing that, but
they made clear that RNA, mRNA, and every
other category was continuing. Food and transgenic vaccines
is not in that category, meaning they are
going forward. That's just one of many that
they're continuing. I don't it's there's lies everywhere.
Every which way you turn, the team the
team the the Republican
Trump supporting side is being played
everywhere
out of the mind that most of them
see it right now, especially with someone like
Candace and Tucker starting to call these things
out. Just sure wish we would have been
able to see this before Trump got put
in that place. Not to suggest that Kamala
was the alternative, but recognize that both of
them would have led us here and maybe
finally this country can have some some actual
change.
Now in regard to the overlap of SNAP
and some funding and some health discussion from
food, meat, kind of the overlap, all of
this is about freedom. Freedom of choice, freedom
of food, freedom of,
you know, being able to choose your path,
whether you want raw milk or whether you
wanna buy from your local butcher. Right now,
that's not the way the world where the
country works
for a lot of reasons.
Chad Prather says, NBC twists words saying Donald
Trump and Walmart Thanksgiving meals cost less but
come with less, and Trump shuts it down
and drops the ultimate mic. I have to
laugh at this, the same thing that Brian,
what's the name, Hagerty and Nick Sore, all
the same. They do this every time where
they ask somebody asked a question, and I
look. I laugh at corporate media left and
right. They're all children. They're all ridiculous. Doesn't
mean everything they say is always false.
She asked a question about something that I
can prove to you is actually the case,
and Trump goes, oh, you're fake news. Fake
news. And then I'll go, yeah. He showed
them. I'm like,
why are you guys are the it's it's
the it's the most childish thing in the
room. So that's your answer to yell them
down? Is it true? Oh, yeah. It is
true. But he said fake news, so, yeah,
we're winning. Like, these are children, guys. This
is a Chad Prather, I don't even know
who he is, 583,000
followers,
and his reaction
is, you're fake you're fake news or we're
cheering that Trump might drop them? Well, here's
what he said. And you can and you
and this is something that is not a
small it's a very small point. Frankly, I
think it's sort of flooding the zone point
to get you distracted and trying to go
lie, lie, lie all over the place. In
some cases, it's important.
Here's the the clip of the exchange, and
then we'll go into what is actually happening,
which is that he's he's wrong. The the
lie of Walmart was a small thing, but
it was. They're smaller, different year. We'll go
over it. Product, the Walmart Thanksgiving meal. Yeah.
Any of these cheaper,
but it also Oh, and then to start
I should've concluded, which we just went over,
even asking Grok, looking up the consensus.
Term keeps trying to claim that grocery prices
are down. Like, not for some in certain
circumstances, like, for everyone across the country. They're
just not. They're more and they're higher. Almost
everything is higher for everybody right now.
Very few
very few not like, most people in most
categories. That's the easiest thing to prove right
now. So that's to say that he's now
just continuing to lie to sell people who
are his team about how they're all winning,
even though they should know, by their anybody,
that they're spending more. So that just shows
you that there's so many people out there
that are willing to ignore their actual circumstances
to be able to yell for a certain
team. I don't believe that can possibly be
the majority. I just don't. In fact, I
think we can prove that. But consider that
it's not. Thanksgiving
meal. Yeah. And it is cheaper. You brought
up the Walmart Thanksgiving meal. Yeah. And it
is cheaper, but it also contains
less. As a Well, I haven't heard that
you're telling me. Who
you with who you have that 18 answer.
Oh, sorry. I just said he has I
haven't heard that, he says. Meaning, you don't
even say you know for sure. You might
be wrong. She might be right. But your
reaction is?
Who you have NBC News, sir. Fake news.
NBC.
You fake news. What a what a problem
for me? NBC's gone down the tubes along
with most of the rest of them. Now
look.
You could argue he's trolling just to make
people laugh. But this point is the same.
He's doing that, trolling. He's doing whatever you
think he's doing, whether sincere, a joke, whatever,
to ignore the point, which is that he's
wrong.
Simple as that.
And that you're being misled about the reality
of your financial circumstance. Right? That should matter.
But everyone loves to go, yeah. Don't go
into Democrats. You shouldn't say everyone. The team
sport names from alternative media
at the expense of literally everything they claim
you're fighting for, which is pretty damn embarrassing
if you ask me.
But this is just a graphic. You can
look this up for yourself. Ask Grok. Do
whatever you want. It's very basic. The fact
is, like she said, it's cheaper, but yes,
much smaller. So you're playing people. But But
it's a tiny point. It shouldn't even matter.
The bottom line is,
the the large outcomes in regard to what
they claim. Why aren't vaccines
enough for people to call out what this
is? Let alone everything else. Or how about
this conversation?
Jump judge orders Trump administration to fully fund
snap. Now this is just a quick overlap.
Remember, the way that this starts, and it's
still basically happening. I think Trump put on
true social that the democrats are, like, almost
I forgot what's the word he used?
Something like terroristic something some very extreme word
about how their democrats are, you know,
shutting keeping it shut down because they want
what they you know, whatever. As always, guys,
let's not be children. It takes both sides
to keep a shutdown going. Either one of
them could bow if they argue that they
want the people to have what they want.
Okay. So when they go, the democrats won't
bend. Well, that means you won't either. Like,
we it's so funny how childish adults can
get when it comes to, I don't know,
waiting in line at the at the at
the,
blank on the word all of a sudden,
at the you know, going to, like, a
amusement park. Right? Waiting in line at the
airport
or
talking about politics. There's two things that come
to my mind. If you wanna see adults
act like the smallest, most immature children, go
watch them get cut in line at an
airport. It's insane even though you all have
a seat that you're assigned. People are ridiculous.
Kinda make it a joke there. The point
is, though, in politics, it's the same way.
I watch grown men, grown women who are
intelligent suddenly act like the dumbest person in
the room because they have a political side.
The point is that realistically, it's obvious that
both sides play a part in keeping the
government shut down. I shouldn't even have to
say that. But then it got to the
point to where they were arguing, oh, they
wanna fund illegal immigrants. That wasn't true. There's
elements of true to the larger point, but
what they were saying was false. And at
the end of the day, they got to
the point where they were standing this down.
I'm good. Keep it shut forever. Makes me
happy. Despite the fact that people will suffer
in that, I understand that. I'm not saying
I don't care about people who don't who
aren't getting what they may need. I just
have the mind that in the long term,
it's in everyone's best interest to not be
reliant on the government. But I get it.
I'm not gonna say it's oh, you know,
there are people that are really suffering, people
that have come to rely on that, and
that's because the governments need they want that
situation. Right? So it behooves you to try
to work away from that. But
here we are. And so now they're arguing
that the rather, the Supreme Court had ruled
that they had to,
so he started to. Or there was a
ruling, and then Supreme Court ruled that he
didn't have to. So here's the overarching point.
It ends up where it comes down to
his choice. Okay. So he's over here saying
that you're not getting all this because the
Democrats. Then there's an opening to do it.
Then he gets the opportunity to not, and
he steps in and doesn't.
Simple as that, guys. So judge orders Trump
to fully do so. Okay? Then they get
a ruling.
Trump administration tells states to undo full SNAP
benefits because of the Supreme Court. Trump administration
is telling states now not, as of today,
to not pay full food November food stamp
benefits,
revising its previous guidance after winning a temporary
victory in supreme court on Friday.
Quote, to the extent states sent full SNAP
payments files for November
after he just said this would happen,
this was unauthorized, he says.
Accordingly, states must immediately
undo
any steps taken to issue full SNAP benefits
for November.
That's what the memo states.
I mean, that's just the bottom line is
you first created the situation, both sides of
it, then you try to use it to
go look at what they're causing because they
wanna do x, y, and z. Then it
becomes a very clear reality that a huge
portion of that are Republicans in Republican states,
and so they try to walk it back
and act like they're gonna do it, then
they get the opportunity to do it. And
then once they get the allowance to not,
they shut it right back down. They don't
care about you. I don't know why people
can't see that by now. And this is
when they can, they try to make it
out to be a bunch of Democrats sucking
off the system. But as far as I
can tell, that's not even the the full
picture. But these things are always very hard
to define. Because, again, to say Democrat versus
Republican does not even represent the most of
the country, but they push you into those
categories because you're in that state and vice
versa. The bottom line, guys, is they don't
care about you in regard to people that
are currently struggling, and they want to use
your strife to make you mad at the
other side.
That's a perfect little microcosm of the where
we are in this country.
Now here is a,
memo from the US Department of Agriculture. That's
this is what it says. The memorandum is
a follow-up to the guidance shared on October
10. The bottom line, Supreme Court grants the
US Department of Agriculture an administrative stay of
the orders issued by the District Court of
Rhode Island. So that was the the lower
court that won and the supreme court gave
them at least a momentary stay. And it
says pending in the explicit direction from the
con to the contrary. From the FNS,
states must not
transmit full benefits insurance files to e to
EBT processors. I mean, why wouldn't you just
if your whole point is this is what's
stopping people, why wouldn't you allow that when
the court ruling was there? Why seek an
an avenue to not help American people? That's
because you understand, this doesn't then stop the
shutdown. They can still have their little political
game of maintaining the shutdown.
They just didn't care because I think at
the end of the day, this would alleviate
the pressure. So as it says very clearly
right here, I think this is where they
pointed out. Oh, did I did I lose
that?
Anyway, I just to cut to the chase,
I forget I think I've I think it's
right here. I just didn't highlight it.
The simple point to make is that they
allowed this to continue
because
they need the snap middle the dynamic to
be able to try
to muscle
it what they want from the left right
paradigm. Right? We're within the teams, the the
the, like
within the shutdown conversation, Democrats versus Republicans. Not
necessarily that they, at the end of the
day, are not all fighting for the same
thing. They are working for their unique independent
interest, and at this point,
at least and let me put it this
way. On top of all of that, maybe
they're just saying this to get make you
think. The point is that they can use
the SNAP benefits as a coercive tool to
pressure the Democrats to get what they want,
but while making sure you suffer. Alright? It's
more important than them to use the SNAP
benefits to manipulate the situation than to allow
you to get what you need. As always,
guys, they don't care about you.
Now on top of all of that,
we have and this is what Trump is
saying about SNAP benefits. He says our country
has to remain very liquid because problems,
catastrophes,
wars. It could be anything. We have to
remain liquid. We can't give everything away.
Well, as what's this guy, senator George
or say, Ruben Gallego, who I'm not familiar
with, but the point is left to right,
it doesn't matter. It's the sentiment that says
this would be a stronger argument if you
hadn't just bailed out Argentina for $40,000,000,000.
Right? You can't act like now you need
to make sure we're there when you're $40,000,000,000
That could mean do you know how much
that could that could solve the problem right
now in regard to this one point? No.
But that went to a failing country because
it's a Zionist country that's selling out to
their highest bidder like everywhere else you could
see right now. So it's not about being
liquid. It's about getting what you want from
it. In this case, you're willing to sell
out the country to benefit a Zionist interest
in Argentina.
But
general, attorney general, Pam Bondi,
after Donald Trump points this out, says, our
investigation is underway. My antitrust
division has taken the lead in the partnership
of our friends with USD USDA and, what's
this, secretary, Brooke Rollins.
He says, I've asked the DOJ to immediately
begin an investigation into the meat packing companies
who are driving up the price of our
beef through illicit collusion, price fixing, and price
manipulation. As far as I can tell, that's
not even what the meat industry thinks.
Remember what happened when we talked about this?
The meat industry spoke up, especially around the
money with about the buying foreign beef. And
they said and on top of the fact
that they can't sell, their prices are too
and Trump chastised them and said, your prices
are good because of me. Basically, shut them
down.
So now,
almost now admitting there is a problem, even
though you just said it wasn't a problem,
now you're saying it's not because of what
we did. It's because of the meat packing
companies, which there's not see, this is how
they play this. It's not necessarily inaccurate. The
point, though, is that it's a larger manipulation,
a larger paradigm of corruption
that they are part of. But it says
we will always protect our American ranchers, and
they are being blamed for what is being
done to the majority foreign owned meatpackers who
artificially inflate prices and jeopardize security of our
nation. You know how you could easily get
around this?
Stop controlling the food supply.
You could easily allow American farmers to sell
to their American communities, but they don't wanna
do that. They want you to work through
their avenue while acting like they're doing this
for you. And it says action must be
taken immediately to protect consumers. Action. More control.
Shut it all down. Here's Bill Gates' fake
meat and fake butter. You know, that's what
they're building behind it all.
And it says,
combat illegal monopolies, which is literally what the
government is, and ensure these corporations are not
criminally profiting at the expense of American people,
like literally they're doing. I'm asking for the
DOJ to access fiduciary. So you're now conducting
like, it's funny how Trump at the executive
branch through Truth Social seems to be conducting
investigations to the DOJ. Not the way that's
supposed to work, by the way. And this
guy simply says, no. You're not.
Massey points out recently, Brazilian owned meatpacker, JBS,
through its
US subsidiary Pilgrim's Pride,
donated $5,000,000
to the Trump fans' inaugural committee, which was
the largest single contribution to the fund. As
long as we don't have country of origin
labels on our beef, this is all just
BS.
They're gonna pick and choose who they go
after and allow the point is they can
decide.
These people don't care about you. You get
the you get the common thread so far?
Now Red Pill USA says this Zionist, grifter,
piece of s h I d, scored $40,000,000,000
for Argentina
while you're stuck with a fifty year mortgage,
which we'll get to toward the end of
the show. They're mocking you, laughing right in
your face. Here
is
Argentina's president doing the Trump dance at Mar
A Lago after getting a $40,000,000
bailout.
At CPAC.
Because that's all that matters. Right? He does
the Trump thing.
We're all Trump supporters.
This is all it takes, apparently. Same as
the left, same as the right. Partisans.
Apparently, it's all about buzzwords and talking points.
Here is an example of you be the
country being sold out. And And by the
way, they're not
we we need we need to do a
focus on Argentina at some point. It's just
wild to me how clearly this is corruption.
So
here's what this comes to.
Homesteading for sovereignty put this out, and it's
I think it's a clip from they clipped
out of a documentary, which I will try
to find myself, and I think they'd this
is the guy's account, so you can follow
him. I'll actually include that.
I followed him after I saw this. Joel
Salatin,
owner of Polyface Farms,
does a really good
it makes an important point right here.
So my first point the first thing is
he's homesteading for sovereignty says, it shouldn't be
illegal
for me to sell my neighbor a pork
chop or a a ground a pound of
ground beef from an animal an animal born,
raised, and processed on my farm or their
farm. I will not comply.
He says food is fundamental to life and
government shouldn't be involved in a food transaction
between neighbors,
but they are. Trump administration, Biden administration, everyone
before it, guys, and it's only getting worse.
More increase. Remember all the, you know, World
Economic Forum overlaps? Well, they're not pointing to
that anymore, but they're doing the exact same
things,
controlling the food supply, shutting down local farms.
I mean, it's exactly what we're talking about.
You're just not hearing it from all the
mainstream alternative media that we're highlighting it during
the left control structure part of it when
now it's Trump doing it. They just don't
point to it. The Democrats aren't even pointing
to it as much in the first place,
so they just stop pointing to it. Here
is a he's basically calling to Trump
in hopes that he will listen and do
something positive. I hope so.
My current,
truly, current,
policy rant
and it's getting some traction. I'm
I'm not
reluctant
to let it go very public that I
am seeking
a thirty minute,
pitch platform with Trump.
There it is. Everybody knows. And there are
some people in very high places that are
that are agitating for that.
For what?
Very specific.
A food emancipation proclamation.
What does that mean?
What that means is if you and I,
as consenting adults, wanna exercise freedom of choice
to give our microbiome
provenance agency,
These are all phrases. Right? We should be
able to engage in a food transaction without
asking the government's permission.
Period. Across the board. I don't care whether
it's raw milk, homemade charcuterie,
cheese, butter,
you know, tomato soup, bone broth, whatever it
may be.
Neighbor to neighbor food transactional commerce
should be able to happen without a bureaucrat
involved.
It's amazing that's even contentious.
Well, what happens if I get sick? Well,
then you deal with your problem. Right? You
you're a self responsible person. Right? How do
you know that's where it came from? The
point is that you can choose to go
buy whatever you want. You can choose to
drink water out of the gutter. It's up
to you. You get sick, that's your joy.
That's your responsibility.
The world in which we live where we
suddenly argue that the government's gotta step in
every time I stub my toe is exactly
the problem.
And people develop this, like, need to always
blame somebody when everything goes wrong in front
of them. Right? You trip and fall over
something. Why isn't there a rail right here?
You're the one that tripped and fell. It's
just very frustrating that we have to live
in this sort of nanny state, maternalism,
because
of people who are overreliant on the system.
And so at the end of the day,
what he's talking about here is there is
freedom. It's liberty, guys. It's fruit food freedom.
Now I'm of the mind that it shouldn't
be just neighbor to neighbor. I should be
able to go buy from anyone I want
wherever I want if I'm willing to exchange.
It's free exchange between free human beings, peer
to peer exchange. We don't need taxes between
us. We don't need to include the government
when I'm buying meat from your farm. That
is what they want. That's what they need.
Not just for money, guys, because they need
to control
I mean, look, if we really wanna get
into where this is going, whether we're talking
about
the, you know, pharmaceutical
overlap, the surveillance overlap, the sort of technocratic
technological
developments,
it gets so much darker. The truth is
you can prove all of this, but just
make it as simple as control over your
life and what you consume and what gets
to grow and what gets to succeed.
Governments are involved in all of it.
So I simply said on this case,
if you think for one second that the
US government, any side of it, Trump's administration,
Biden, anybody else, will allow that, what he
just said, then you simply do not understand
the goal their goal to control your life.
Only a few in congress will even discuss
this topic in earnest,
and none of them are in the current
administration.
Or the last
one. Surprise, surprise.
Very, very clear. Now here is,
Bacon and Bits pointing out what beef beef
initiative said. This is, this is slim, you
know, that that we've talked about before on,
a and wake up before. He simply says,
hey, Zohan Ramdani. Since you hate Trump so
much, why don't you reestablish the meat packing
district as a hub for local beef? That'll
show him.
You see? I don't think that'll happen. You
see? Because these people, when it comes down
to government control,
don't want
your, like, true freedom in this kind of
dynamic. They don't want like, this is whether
it's about controlling the food supply, whether it's
about controlling commerce in that regard, or any
number of overlapping points about health, this is
government wants to be involved in these things.
But see, what he's saying is, look. You
don't like what Trump is doing? Then give
people freedom in this regard. But you see,
he doesn't want that in my opinion. Because
like I said before, Ma'am Dani, despite what
I see right now as being a correct
stance on Israel, which I I'm skeptical for
a lot of reasons whether that's just hype,
but I'll support what he says if I
think it's right in the in the regards
to Israel. But my point is, he wants
more government
like they all do. They want despite Trump
and Elon telling lies to you, the government's
acts much, much bigger than it was before.
They all do that. He is very adamant
about more government, more programs, more in your
life. I want the opposite. You can decide
what you want. We can disagree on that.
That's okay. I don't want that. My point
is that you could argue that if you
wanna see him as a as an outsider
pushing back against the thing, just recognize that
they
whatever.
Within this discussion, they're all insiders,
even Mamdani.
So we have to really think about what
that means. Now if he makes choices like
this, like I'm seeing Massey start to do,
well, I'll say, look at that. That's a
positive choice and I have one more step
in the direction of maybe in the future
thinking he might be on your side. Probably
never though. That's true with where we are
in the world. But it's it's an incremental
thing. It's about consistency of choice and outcome
and precedent. How many times have they continued
to follow through with their principles? Hopefully,
always. And then you can argue somebody actually
means what they say. Now overlapping on the
financial side of it, Janice Gurl shared this
again recently. Jimmy Dore pointed to some of
her research again. We recently put this article
out with her. How American Tax Dollars Prop
Up Israel's Zombie Economy, written by Janice Gurl.
It's wild. And the simple point is that
they're forcing Americans to invest in failing Israeli
financial bonds and and failing. I mean, losing
money despite the fact that these companies have
a fudiciary
responsibility to make money, and they're losing money
and they know they are and they're forcing
you to reinvest in it to support Israel.
Just violating blatant laws in front of you
in order to control to make sure Israel
doesn't fail. That's the way that is like
a perfect overview of where we are in
the world right now. They know they're breaking
the law. They're willing to do it in
plain daylight because Israel needs to succeed. And
then when you call it out, well, somehow
this rationalization
about fighting evil or whatever it is when
they're the ones literally committing genocide. Anyway,
point is to make sure you understand this,
the the the infiltration of even the financial
side of it, that Americans are suffering not
just because Trump and the government are selling
you out or to Biden, but because they're
being sold out to a foreign power who
is act actively fighting against American interests.
Now on the $2,000 point
oh, wait.
Oh, that's interesting. I think I mixed these
up.
Oh, I'm gonna come back to this, actually.
I forgot that I I put this. So
I will come back to it in a
second. I wanted to conclude include the $2,000
mortgage
fifty year mortgage kind of overlap to all
this. Let me make sure I mixed hear
me real quick. I guess I forgot to
move those around.
Next, we're gonna get into the January 6
and the Blaze report and what this means.
Let me just organize this really quickly.
There we go.
Okay.
Now just for in case you saw that,
the point is simply that, you you know,
Trump with it's kinda I really could just
continue that point right there of,
you know, being sold out, being claimed, we're
doing things. You know, here's a fifty year
mortgage. You'll owe nothing and be happy. Exactly.
Here's $2,000.
Here's some some crumbs with everything we've taken
from you. You know? Are you are you
okay? It's like it's just clearly
it's an insult.
To intelligent people, it's an insult. But we'll
come back to that. Because I'm gonna end
with a very important point about the, you
know, Candace Owens and plenty of others that
are just going Trump has sold us out.
Candace just made a very, very public statement
in a video about that. You know, Piers
Morgan talking about it. That's making some big
people very unhappy.
But before we get to that, you might
have seen this reporting, and I wanna I
wanna juxtapose this with Cash Patel, Michigan, FBI.
It's pretty weird what's going on right now.
Now you know this story. We've talked about
this a lot. Now Blaze Media did a
report on this in regard to basically one
new element.
I shouldn't say only one new element. There's
part that had come up new from, like,
when we last covered this. But one part
that's, like, the the reason this is coming
out, which is that they claim they have
a 94 to 98%
match on the gait, the walk of the
person they claim is the bomber,
which, like, I don't like, I think we
should stand back and consider the entire thing
might be one large look. I I think
you know that from my perspective.
I'm not of the mind. This is a
the Democrats trapping the Republicans. I mean, in
some element that exists because not everyone's in
the know.
But I think all of this is in
the interest of the government controlling your life.
And that's why Pelosi is not in jail.
That's why I don't think any of them
are gonna go to jail. That has to
matter right now. They would be in jail
with the what they already claimed they know
if there was real
effort to put these people behind bars. But
that aside from whether or not this and
I'll point it to it again that I
think this is one larger thing. But just
taking it from within the conversation, right, that
this was a potential manipulation to trap the
Republicans, which from an individual perspective, I do
believe that.
MAGA wearing hat Republicans were they were your
side, by the way, and the, you know,
the government was trying to trap you in
that whole scenario. That's what I believe. And
then you can quite frankly prove that. But
this
overlaps with an interesting point where it turns
out that this person
who was there that day, who was in
Capitol Police, who now works for the CIA,
who
was from Ukraine,
interesting overlaps and all, but it could just
be coincidence. We'll we'll go through it.
Was the person that they say matches the
gate of the bomber.
All this does is explode open the real
point that we've if this was a Capitol
police who literally went out and placed these
bombs in order to create the idea that
this was a larger event,
you could one or two ways you look
at that. That's Democrats trying to frame Republicans,
which is the easiest low hanging fruit, but
very much cush could be the case,
or it's just a larger government agenda to
create the air that that's happening to use
the two party division to achieve what they're
still trying to achieve now, which is, support
you know, censorship, control of our rights, second
amendment, free speech, everything.
You can consider for yourself. Here's what the
report says.
A forensic analysis of a female former US
Capitol Police officer, and that her gate is
a 94 to 98% match to the unique
stride of a long sought January 6 pipe
bomb suspect according to a in Blaze news
investigation confirmed by several intelligence sources, which as
far as I'm concerned from Blaze or any
other mainstream platform
confirmed by several sources doesn't mean anything unless
you could verify for yourself. A source close
to a congressional investigation of January 6 additionally
told Blaze news evidence
has news wait. Oh, told Blaze news evidence
has emerged recently that pointed toward law enforcement
possibly being involved in the planting of the
pipe bombs.
So, you can read through this for yourself.
I recommend you do. Some of it's interesting.
This is an agent of that.
If you know my skepticism, I think all
of us should have about the FBI, whether
it's Biden or Trump or Cash or whoever
else, Wray.
Is this the FBI is literally I think
its core job is to set these things
up. And so here we are where we
have another agent who's saying,
Kirchhoff, who was a Capitol Police officer for
four and a half years. I'm sorry. Not
wasn't the agent part. So this is another
officer who was involved with this. They get
into the FBI and how and the Capitol,
and the Secret Service, by the way, who
all of which feel that this was sort
of a setup. It says,
who was a Capitol Police officer, he just
left the department in mid twenty twenty one
for security detail at the CIA. Oh, I'm
sorry. That I just I already just had
that. I just didn't jump down far enough.
The point was that this person sorry. I'm
being confusing.
The woman you're looking at for the podcast,
the woman they claim is the the potential
pipe bomb,
pipe bomber.
Her name was Kirchhoff
and left this Capitol Police
after this to go work for the CIA.
I find that just almost too much.
But then it goes on to say the
out the the residents
appeared to be under the watch of law
enforcement officers on Friday night.
Blaze News editor in chief Christopher Bedford was
pulled over by police officer after stopping to
observe the home. He was then allowed to
leave. So something's going on around this right
now in the watching of the house. Says
the FBI, which failed to solve the case
in nearly five years of investigation, but in
indicated that it was closing in after Blaze
News brought its investigation to intelligence sources. So,
basically, Blaze News is the one finding out
and informing the FBI. It seems like a
weird thing to happen. And it says, was
feet
they were feet from the Falls Church address
of the pipe bomb suspect days after January
6. There's just this weird overlap. I can't
I don't know how we take is face
value.
Whether it's a Capitol Police member or a
former or an FBI or a Secret Service,
they're all people that are literally tapped into
the structure who are now telling you retroactively
parts of the story. Now consider them. Always
question everything. Consider all possibilities.
But I'm very skeptical
about the point of, you know, with it's
always about trying to use the current momentum.
But it seems the it says the former
FBI special agent Kyle Sarafin realized Friday that
he was doing surveillance next door to the
woman now suspected of being a January 6
pipe bomber. What a coincidence. So you're doing
a totally separate thing. This blaze news comes
out, and they go, oh my god. She's
right there next door.
Seems weird. And it says the FBI put
us one door away from the pipe bomber
within days of January 6, and we were
deliberately pulled out of no law pulled for
no logical or
logically investigation reason
investigative reason. And everything about this tell that
tells me that they were involved in a
cover up. So, again, you see that kind
of a statement. Well, I mean, that could
indicate that surely,
But that wouldn't mean you then automatically assume
it's a grand cover up. I mean, I
do think there's a lot of that happening.
Feels, you know, like you're driving what you
want to tell people. The forensic study arranged
by Blaze revealed that Kirchhoff is up to
98% match of the gate of the pipe
armor. Now it's interesting to find out what
that overlap would be. Is it possible other
people could have similar gates? It is a
pretty specific thing if you look into it.
But since the findings were confirmed by several
current intelligence sources who viewed the study results,
I guess. You know, when Jones goes my
big, big, big sources, who knows? Maybe they're
not even there. I don't I just don't
trust any of these people when they point
to something you can't verify.
This and also because they're very partisan and
very subjective when it comes to that kind
of a game. Anyway, you can read through
all this. The point is it comes down
to them saying that they, you know, were
investigating this. They were shut down.
They she was one of the ones that
were shooting,
you know, the the pepper balls and more
somewhat overlapping lethal things at people that were
there. There's the overlap of the person, and
here's here's the image of the pipe bomb.
They claim was rent was reduced in quality,
so it was harder to see. I mean,
guys, things that happen every time. I've seen
three examples of just didn't the Trump administration
this
second one, multiple times where they've released information
like Kash Patel and been caught for it.
Yeah. So I mean, the the only last
point I think was
it says thirteen months before taking office as
FBI director,
Kash Patel seemed to raise the possibility that
the pipe bombs were fakes.
If the and I mean and by the
way, you take a look at these things,
that was one of the leading idea. These
things look ridiculous to me. Now these could
very well be real, but a kitchen timer
people made fun of this when this was
the when this looks like duct tape wires
and a timer. So certainly could be real.
Now now seems to be what they're arguing,
but
I it's kind of a weird change from
what was there before. Now, he said they
were fake before. Like, he said that the
Epstein files were gonna come out. But he
says, if the allegations about the bomber aren't
true, Patel says on the Bennet Johnson show,
where all the big important news comes out,
he says, or there was some government it
rues or some FBI rogue source or whatever.
I don't know because I don't have the
case files.
Then there's another corruption scandal on and around
election time narrative. Okay. So now you've had
the case files since January
or, you know, that a little bit after
that. Nothing's happened.
So this, arguably, was already a way they
were already aware of most of this other
than, I guess, the gait analysis, but they've
now given it to them. How long do
they know this? How long has this been
up in the air? Apparently, this has been
going on for a month.
So
other than in please read through this for
more of the nuanced subjective points. For me,
the forensic match is the gait of the
way they're walking,
which I argue is somewhat subjective at the
end of the day, but it is you
know, there is a science behind it. But
isn't it possible this is something that's also
being kind of organized in that direction?
So to be clear, you haven't seen this
already. Like, I'm very adamant about my opinion
on this, and I think it's easily proven.
January 6 was a very clear government operation.
Doesn't mean every part of it. Doesn't mean
every single thing was, you know, included, but
you can literally prove how this went down
overlapping with government sources. Now we know the
FBI agents. We have the naval aspects of
it. We have all sorts of things we've
proven over the years. And,
Sergei Benin, who is a Ukrainian
Azov movement element, who's right there next to
Jake Chansley, who was screaming things in Russian,
or the people that were part of a
left wing group that were on video going,
we tricked them. We got it. I have
to bring this up every time.
So the point is, don't think for a
second that I'm arguing this is not necessarily
a larger thing. My point is to wonder
why now and in this very overlap,
when if this does turn out to be
something more, the interesting connection, as as Emily's
pointing out, to the very people we're talking
about.
Right? So this person says her family's from
Ukraine, that she works for the CIA, or
at least she did, tells you everything you
need to know.
That's the alleged January 6 pipe bomber firing
at the beginning of the Capitol Police response
to the Peace Memorial Gate Breach.
And Ukraine has an interest in seeing Biden
take the White House, this person writes, which,
you know, that's a partisan perspective for sure.
But I think it's interesting to recognize
all the people that were involved.
And on top of that, that to this
very day, these things don't get discussed by
left or right.
Truly.
Now Thomas Massie
seems to feel there's something to this. He
says, this is the biggest scandal of my
lifetime.
Steve Baker did not did what an $11,000,000,000
did what an $11,000,000,000 agency the FBI could
not
do or worse yet covered up. He identified
the January 6 pipe bomber, and she wasn't
working alone. Now
I'm not gonna say we know that for
a fact. I I haven't personally gone through
and vetted the gate analysis that they've conducted
And now asking the government who lies to
you, like like they're breathing. You know, it's
it's it's I'm gonna need a hell of
a lot more to make this case. But
it seems to point in the right direction
to me. And overall,
it's the idea that I think comes out
of this that why hasn't the FBI done
this?
Whether before or Kash Patel. I mean, really
take a second to think about if this
because the bigger picture we're gonna get into
is whether it's Pelosi or go Bill Gates
or Klaus Schwab or any of it.
No one has gone to jail.
No one.
So
why would this be any different.
And since we're Steve Baker from the blaze
who breaks us down you can read it
for yourself.
Thomas Massey then says again later in the
day or the next day America's waking up
today to learn that Capitol Police turned CIA
orchestrated
that Capitol Police, I guess, turned CIA orchestrated
the pipe bombs on January 6, and the
FBI is covered up for four years.
That's into Cash Patel, mind you. He says,
I questioned FBI doctor director Wray, ATF director,
Dilb Diddlebatch, and FBI assistant director
over under oath, and they all played dumb.
Oh, and let's not forget this. It's just
that he tagged Cash Patel in this.
Right? And since Kash Patel needs to make
a statement tomorrow when this breaks. He did
not.
This is on the seventh. It's the ninth.
And he didn't even he hasn't even addressed
this yet as far as I can tell.
Not that he has to respond, but it's
a big deal. And it seems to be
something his his own team very much wants
to know more about, and it seems he's
doing nothing about it.
This says their own article admits the FBI
was complicit from day one. So why on
earth would they not release everything now instead
of giving the FBI time to bury the
truth? Right. I'll review all the evidence with
an open mind, but this stinks of corruption
from the start.
Now
the question is to is whether or not
like, what's happening right now with the current
Trump administration FBI?
Yeah. Because what the investigation seems to show
is that they have had this the entire
time.
Not the gate overlap, but all the information.
By the way, again, we already know that
there was more to this story. And it
says, Steve Baker is an honest man, Thomas
Massie writes.
Though, through and through I'm not gonna say
I agree with that. I'm not even saying
I'm saying I'm not gonna state that I
think someone is absolutely honest. I don't know
that. I'm not sure I'm that familiar with
Steve Baker from The Blaze. He says the
question is, why didn't Kash Patel uncover this
and why did he try to prevent its
release? I agree with that. I guess we'll
find
out. This is just humorous to me. This
is
a a Republican side supporting platform, 311,000
followers, and it says, if the FBI can't,
quote, find the January 6 pipe bomber because
it was busy covering it up, does that
mean the FBI can't find Charlie Kirk's real
killer either?
They they've lost their support, guys.
He says, I don't care who hears it,
but I trust Caspertell no more than I
trusted Christopher Wray. Zero trust. See, this is
what an this is what an an honest
person I'm not gonna say I can prove
Red Pill USA is honest, but my point
is in a general sense, an honest person
will be able to say, I trump hort
Trump, but I don't support his choice right
there. I support Trump, but I don't support
Cash Patel. But see, you get the cat
turds and the Benny Johnson that are Nick
Saunders that will scream down your throat about
how you're not MAGA because you don't choose
the side.
That says the entire FBI needs to be
splintered into a thousand pieces and scattered into
the winds. I agree.
Thomas Massey says, unbelievable.
Former FBI in charge of January 6 investigation
tells me phone data that could have been
used to identify the person who placed the
bomb on January 5 was, quote, corrupted.
Thank you,
Darren Beadle or Beatty, excuse me,
whose groundbreaking reporting
and help was used to formulate my questions.
Now this is a clip from 2023
of Thomas Mass. He's talking about this on
Fox News. Funny thing to think about as
well what Fox News,
you know, the kind of questions they're asking.
Now and, like, you know, my point, if
this was another the other way around, you
think Ingram would be asking questions that probe
into what the Trump administration was doing? I
just think it's always funny to consider that.
You know, it could
Oh, that's right. I gotta come back to
that. I gotta turn now to January 6
because we still have no idea
who placed that that pipe bomb the pipe
bombs near the DNC in RNC Headquarters the
night before. And today, you sent a letter
to the FBI director,
Ray.
What's in that letter, and what do you
expect to hear from him at this point?
Well, Jim Jordan and I had a chance
to to interview the guy who was in
charge of the DC field office, who was
in charge of finding out who this pipe
bomber was. And it turns out we're 900
later, they don't have a suspect. And I
think one of the the biggest things that
I learned in this interview with him was
that the phone data was corrupted. I So
first and foremost, guys, right, is that right
there, you understand that this information there was
more to this. So you have to acknowledge
if this is if you're looking at the
full picture that the Biden administration
chose to not pursue this lead. Now why
would that be? Now it doesn't it could
mean that's because this was a Capitol Police
member they're working with and and later joined
the CIA,
or it could be something else. We shouldn't
assume just because that connects that that's the
answer. But it's very interesting how that lines
up. Right? And so now there's more coming
out. And here's even Thomas Massie saying back
then that they had this information, 2023.
So it's not just Trump. It's not just
Biden, guys. It's the US government and their
willingness to lie to you for their own
interests.
Ask him. I said, so did you know,
we saw on the video the suspect the
night before who you think planted the bomb.
We saw them use a phone a few
times.
How did you use the phone data? And
he said, basically, well, you're not gonna believe
this. He even used the word conspiracy theory.
He didn't want to tell us because he
thought it would fuel more conspiracy theories
that they went to the phone providers
and the data was corrupted.
It's like Epstein's camera was not working right
in the cell. Right? Office or something. Now
now we have the ability, as we saw
in January 6, when they were looking over
people's bank records,
geofencing them, tracking them with their cell phone,
cell phone tracking technology,
and no suspects. So it's all because Don't
miss the ingram point.
Right? Well, we used it all then. Let's
use it now. Right? Like, so you're you
you you criticize that against Republicans.
Right? Didn't the Democrats use all their sir
in serve in invasive surveillance tactics to track
it down, you know, just like they're using
right now against every American claiming they're looking
for immigrants?
And the point was, why can't we use
that with the implication being it's a Democrat
thing we're going after now?
So as always, guys, people trapped in the
partisanship are willing to do the bad thing
to the other side when it suits their
interests. And back and forth, you put them
together, and guess what? Now every side supports
the problem.
As long as it's being done against the
bad guys, which is the other side and
it's always the other side. I mean, it's
just such a simple basic reality that always
comes to pass, whether it's, you know, I
mean, with COVID nineteen or anything else, right?
They come together and achieve the end while
pointing at each other. That technology
was was not working properly, and we have
cameras in every inch of Capitol Hill, every
single inch.
That is what he claims. The geofence data
was corrupt. Oh, how convenient. Okay. The other
question that I asked him was, could these
bombs have gone off? I asked him to
explain to me how a one hour kitchen
timer could Okay. To my point before, would
Laura Ingram now say how convenient? Right now,
if it was Trump's administration and Cash Patel
sitting there, would she now go, oh, how
convenient? Why don't you find it now? How
much you wanna bet she would not do
that? How much you wanna bet she would
be giving you another narrative that makes it
seem like they're not responsible?
You know how this works, guys. That's Fox,
CNN, mainstream multimedia is what they do. But
still about a point now. It should be
just the same point should apply today. Properly.
And we have cameras in every inch. Okay.
The other question that I asked him was,
could these bombs have gone off? I asked
him to explain to me how a one
hour kitchen timer can set a bomb off
seventeen hours later. Think about how dumb that
is. So I agree, just like I did
last time, that the logical reality of this
is that this was a psychological operation.
And he admitted for the first time, and
this kinda contradicts what he said in the
media before, that it couldn't. And then the
other thing that I So it wouldn't have.
Right? So the person planting that bomb in
that white jacket was likely aware that that
thing was not real or wasn't gonna blow
up. Right? So that would make it less
much less of a severe crime. Right? It's
more of a do this for the American
do this for your your, you know, do
this patriot for your government to to go
to get the bad not MAGA Nazis who
are trying to overthrow the government. You know,
whatever the the momentum is. Or do this
and you could join the CIA. Right? That's
not that far fetched, guys. Asked him was
the given all these coincidences,
wouldn't the people who discovered the bombs be
suspects
since the bombs were basically inert and then
they were found within twenty minutes of the
first breach of the capital, both bombs. He
said, that's investment Yeah. Think about how weird
that is. Right? What what timing to seek
out and find those things unrelated to where
you were currently were? Suddenly, it relates to
the January.
01/2001. Yes. Both of those people would be
suspects. I said, who found the second bomb?
He said, I don't know. I said, do
you have any video? He doesn't know. I've
we've got video at the Capitol that I've
reviewed. I think we've we've got video of
who found the second bomb, and we're gonna
be back to the FBI and say, why
didn't you follow-up with this person? Oh, and
that's We can hit the home plate at
Yankee Stadium from outer space, but we can't
find the one guy. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Okay,
Ingram. Now make that today when cash is
on your show. How much you wanna bet
that doesn't happen? The point is Massey very
clearly
very clearly, is laying out the reality. In
2023,
we so right then, that's Biden administration.
Wray
failing or covering it up 100%.
Then or at least in the context of,
you know, I can't speak to their intentions,
but the point is that Massey brought it
in. Nothing happened. Okay.
Now cash comes in. That's still there. Just
like the Epstein point. Nothing changed. He was
speaking oh, you know, what he say about
them? We're gonna get to the bottom of
this when I get into power.
Nothing.
Is Pelosi in jail? No. No. Nothing. Nobody.
Not one person.
You know that speaks volumes.
Now you look like like people would love
to say, maybe tomorrow. Maybe, don't rush him,
Ryan. He's going through all the sure. Sure.
Fantastic.
When it happens,
then you can give him credit for it.
Up until then, when nothing is happening, it's
obviously in your interest to go, why isn't
anything happening? As opposed to going, yay, team.
Well, here is an example of people who
are calling this out from all different angles,
but this is, the by the way, funny
showing a a little clip of,
Lindsey Graham walking by and fist bumping Kamala
Harris. She's perfect. But the point is, you
want your blood to boil? He writes, Lindsey
Graham told Capitol Police, you've got guns. Use
them. Michael Byrd then shot and killed Ashley
Babbitt. Hours later, Graham stood before congress and
said, enough is enough. Count me out. And
when the election was certified, he fist bumped
Kamala Harris on the senate floor. Let that
sink in. He was in on it. Their
opinion. But, yes, it's very much a two
party illusion. And if you still can't see
that, I don't know what else to show
you.
Now watch these shows if you wanna get
into this in deep in the original overlap.
There's plenty of stuff that's come up since
then. And just search January 6 tab on
on TLAB for more of what we've covered,
but there's plenty out there that have covered
this extensively.
January 6 was always a very clear government
operation. Before that, we covered it on 2022.
January 6, the failed false flag meant to
blame Russia and you using the CIA growing
Aza battalion. It was a very specific
focal point of the whole thing.
And, of course, Whitney and I talked about
this on '20 in 2022. Whitney Webb interviewed
January 6, Azov battalion, and the war on
domestic terrorism, or rather on you.
Now, where that goes, and I'll follow-up in
regard to, you know, what what comes of
that report. And, hopefully, you send me things
if you guys see it too. But do
you think anything's gonna happen?
I mean, do you really think that they're
gonna follow-up and go after this person who
connects back to the FBI or the CIA?
I mean, I'd like to believe so. Nobody's
above the law. Right, Kash Patel? But I
doubt it will happen.
Now, we're gonna what's actually happening? Right? So
as that's going on, where are the Epstein
files? Right? Where are all the Democrat operatives
that you said were gonna get arrested? What
about the Social Security theft? What about Doge
and all the illegal funding? What about on
and on and on and on? Yeah. But
nobody's been arrested. Okay. Maybe it's all coming
down. This was on 2020 or excuse me,
'11,
the November 3.
The war focused peace president.
Gaza AI drones now surveilling US cities, which
is happening. And, of course, Kash Patel's FBI
false flag, which is what I very much
think is going on here. We're also gonna
make a point toward the end or, I
think somewhere in here about the
oh, I think that's actually right now. I
moved it up here because it relates to
the
insanely
insulting thing of supporting the ISIS connected linked
or, you know, the Al Qaeda leader in
Syria,
who is the same thing we're talking about
while acting like you're fighting the same thing.
Even though what seems to be is you
framing a couple of Muslims to go after
the whole thing. My opinion. Because, again, they've
yet to lead I mean, I really wanna
see this actual the the conversation.
I wanna see the chats that they claim
add up to them going wink, wink. We're
gonna like, basically going pumpkin and good deeds
and, you know, training with god. I mean,
that means terrorism.
You know, it's wild to see what they
claim means something. We'll go through it right
now. To me,
without seeing more of this, it's very suspicious
where they're at. But as I said, maybe
they when they produce a whole lot more
evidence, I'll be the first to say, yeah.
It looks like that adds up. At the
moment, with their rack track record and what
they're currently doing, it does not feel right.
So here is one of the follow ups.
Or this was on the sixth. I just
thought this image was funny. It's crazy. People
left and right are kinda calling this guy
out. But he says, update on the alleged
foiled terrorist attack. There's now been six people
that have been arrested. Now to break it
down kind of quickly over the last shows,
originally, it was two people. I think it
was two or three. Two originally were the
main focus in Dearborn, Michigan.
Now they've arrested Moore after that in different
place, some in New Jersey. They're trying to
make this their that we're are gonna get
into it now. They're claiming it's a ISIS
network through all these places based on based
on,
I mean, almost entirely subjective information.
Again, at least what they're showing so far.
But in the beginning, the two people in
Dearborn, I think, were the focal point.
And the and everything comes back to the
fact that they are you know, just because
they have guns and they had something they
were going to do on Halloween, referencing pumpkin
day, But therefore, that means they were planning
an ISIS attack because they claimed there are
links to ISIS groups that they've yet to
prove. And on top of that, they claimed
that because of all these things we know
are happening, that's why these words are all
dangerous. That's why having the gun is terrorism
because he's linked to this thing we can't
prove right now.
And so, overall, what it seems like to
me, like with Dallas, if you remember,
you had two guy which, by the way,
I forgot to look into that. Damn, I
was gonna overlap it today. I don't wanna
break off now. But let me know in
the chat
what's going on with the Dallas shooting, with
the FBI.
Right? The reality or rather, was it it
was the ICE location. What what important is
that the two people they claim were the
ones that get they're charging it with, like,
support the same way they're doing now,
arguably had nothing to do with this that
they can prove. There was one guy who
very well could be a CIA agent for
all we know, a Mossad agent or anything
else, who simply was the one that shot
and took off, and they claimed that these
two helped him. Now, right now, they're going,
we didn't have anything to do with that.
And the evidence doesn't even suggest they're connected.
They this could be any overall, it's up
in the ear like this one is, and
I've yet to see it flesh out. Let
me know if there's any update in the
chat, if you guys see anything.
But so that very well could be that
they all plan it together. Right? They could
all three plan this and they just got
caught. Very much a possibility. But with everything
else we keep
seeing, or every like, somebody's largest
assassination stories of the past, it turns out
to be somebody who carries it out and
somebody who gets blamed for it.
And it's very easy to see how this
works. They've done the the FBI has a
track record of literally manufacturing events. The New
York Times has covered it. So my point
is coming to now, we got six different
people. There seems to be one main guy
that seems to be the focal point of
the one connected to ISIS. Now if you
can't prove that guy is actually connected to
these first two guys in Michigan, just that
he was in a chatroom when they were
talking about things, this seems to be manufactured.
And their lawyer is the one saying there's
literally nothing to go on with this, but
a lawyer would say that if he's defending
his people. But he says now on the
sixth that they have
update on the alleged Foyle terrorist attack. They've
got six people connected to the case. He
says, this time, out of Washington state.
Washington.
So New Jersey, Washington,
and,
Michigan.
This was another individual
allegedly providing material support inspired by ISIS. I
mean, the idea that you have ISIS inspired,
I mean, what it just feels flimsy on
its face. What are we talking about? A
group that literally, by the way,
is
a created,
operated, owned, manipulated,
funded, armed by all the L loans we're
talking about. That's not every single faction and
ever who knows whether they even lost control
today? But the reality of it, from Corbett's
work, from Ben Swan, from the documentaries, from
the source material,
they are the ones arming, moving, and working
with these groups. Israel more than anybody, it
seems. So the idea that you're saying so
inspired by a US intelligence,
Israel intelligence operative asset, well, that's interesting to
think about. But on top of that, that
we're saying that they were what? Looking at
that propaganda and going, I wanna just randomly
go kill people? Like, it just feels
empty.
I mean, look. Yeah. Maybe they were watching
propaganda. Maybe they were hopped up on antidepressants
and didn't know any better. I mean, that
doesn't then make it okay.
But it's not as simple as just they
were they were radicalized
by evil ideas. What does that amount to?
Well, you need to control ideas.
Always.
Partners continue to do an outstanding job.
That's what he says.
So he retweeted this. This is from the
third. And it's just kind of it's out
there. Right now, his whole account is all
about pointing back to this story.
So the FBI, with how much the director
has to do, this is the one thing,
the only thing, find find that very ridiculous.
The criminal complaint unsealed this morning, and it
is still, as of right now, a criminal
complaint.
Yeah. It's the weirdest thing in the world
to go back and forth with Grock,
because Grok just seems to intent on trying
to convince you that there's indictments, that if
there have not been indictments, there's been a
criminal complaint
for it complaints
for all for everybody involved.
There is no indictment. There's no no pleas.
This has not gone to court yet because
there's no indictments yet, which means it might
not go anywhere. Now criminal complaints are just
allegations. Same with indictments, by the way, but
indictments have a different level.
Both basically, that that begins the charges into
a court process. They have to say the
plea. In this case, they're just criminal complaints,
which means it could go nowhere. It's an
investigation.
But my point is you ask Grok and
they'll go, yes. Indictments. Even BBC and a
few others were forced to retract that because
they also said indictments. It just show you
how prolific these nonsensical lies go. Right out
of the gate, I said, that's not true.
But it says they revealed detailed investigation that
had been taking place for months with evidence
showing subjects allegedly
discussing details, plans for committing a terrorist attack.
Now it's insane that this is how you're
framing this. If you actually even read, like
we will, what they say, it's all you
get is quotes around specific buzzwords.
No actual quotes of what they were saying.
No actual exchange. Like, give me an image
of the actual back and forth. I wanna
see what they said, what the context was,
and what they meant. I bet you that
never even comes out. Because if all you
wanna say is these people had guns and
here they reference pumpkin, that's how we know
it was a terrorist attack, which is basically
what you're getting, that doesn't mean anything to
me. That means you guys are claiming you
knew that based on the word pumpkin. Now
I don't think it's as simple as that.
But discussing detailed plans for an attack has
yet to actually materialize.
Not to say it's not there. They've yet
to prove that. And it says sharing pro
ISIS material on social media. Again, a baseless
claim from people like Kash Patel who have
been caught lying. Encouraging violent attacks. Not as
far as I can tell. These are statements
made bay based on subjective,
tangential information that might in some cases, I'll
show you aren't even connected to the people
they're talking about. Purchasing a shotgun.
Right. Okay. So owning tactical gear shotgun, which
half of this country owns, is apparently now
makes you a terrorist if you talk about
pumpkins and own a gun. It says, and
more, all of which matches exactly what Kash
Patel and the FBI said.
That's all just, you know, just kind of
rehashing. Well, this is the story. Everyone loves
to pair it what the team says.
Well, here he comes out on the seventh
after look look at his account. He's already
shared this. He's already posted this. So he
this is the PR marketing Trump administration. You
just point to another article and go, the
thing.
Right? The thing right there, and then the
thing that they said. Just showing what the
here's what Fox said about me. We already
reported this story, man. What else are you
doing? What about the Epstein files? What about
is that the only investigation you have ongoing?
And, look, Twitter, they don't have to post
everything they do. But Cash seems very intent
on trying to convince you that he's doing
things. And, again, this is the only thing
he's talking about. Maybe because he doesn't want
to let you know that he's not investigating
January 6 or Pelosi or any of them.
The Michigan terror
case, now I guess it's no longer alleged
now, shows exactly why vigilance matters, he says,
praising himself. That's what Trump has taught them.
These suspects weren't acting alone. They were radicalized,
seeking guidance from extremists tied to ICE's ideology.
See, somebody told them to shift the tone.
At first, he was going, the alleged thing
that we can't because that's the reality. No
one's been charged. No one's been indicted or
rather found guilty of a crime, not indicted.
They've only been criminal complaints. The investigation's ongoing.
Nobody's actually been found guilty. But now suddenly,
it's a terror case, and we know that
they were acting alone. They were connected to
terrorism by society.
The tweet he put out first about there
being
international connections and weapons training, he deleted that
because it was ridiculous when compared to the
facts. He was very clearly painting what he
wanted you to see as some larger network.
Clearly, my point is over the fifth to
the seventh, somebody said, shift your tone.
Wait. Just like Bondi and Noam and all
the rest do, state it as a fact
because that's what they do. He says this
FBI and our fantastic
partner stopped another potential massacre.
So we're told.
Michigan look. Michigan terrorist sucks best got advice
from ISIS supporting preacher's dad.
Remember, we talked about this already. I told
you this is where it's going.
Here's the
article. New York Post.
So
Michigan terror suspects, funny how, you know, you
just absolutely made it sound on the seventh
like they were guilty and you knew, got
advice from ISIS supporting preacher's dad. I mean,
do you not just on his face? Think
of think of how stupid this is.
Everyone in the world knows that you guys
are surveilling these chat rooms, and everyone knows
this, guys. Now no one is smart enough
to know that, like, to consciously be aware
of that, but it's pretty public knowledge. On
top of that, we know that there was
two FBI agents involved in this, one early
on and one even before that based on
the later reporting.
So for all we know, they literally manufactured
this, which is what it seems like because
nothing actually happened. No event was carried out.
So if nothing happened and you're asking for
something you started to plan, what are we
talking about? The FBI is what we're talking
about. That's what they do. But in this
case,
somebody jumps in a chat room and you're
discussing a terror plot, and it's okay. A
random stranger jumps in and goes, hey. Let
me join your terror plot. It just doesn't
seem like it makes any sense at all,
but certainly possible. And then you're telling us
that they reach out on the record on
a public
exchange to an ISIS supporting per they claim
as an ISIS terrorist and go, hey. Give
us some advice on this terror plot. I
mean, doesn't this just seem ridiculous?
Well, it seems like kind of the stuff
you get from people that are out of
their depth.
But it says and I mean, you clearly
get my opinion. But I wanna stress again,
it's my opinion.
A suspect accused of plotting the Michigan Halloween
terror attack allegedly, quote, allegedly. So an alleged
plot that we don't know when, how, or
what was gonna happen. That was their own
statement. We don't know where it'll happen. We
don't know what they're planning. We don't know
when it will happen.
When, where, how. But you know it was
gonna happen. I mean, again, that's what a
direct quote from the FBI.
And then so an event that you didn't
know when, where, or how it was gonna
take place, they got, allegedly, a guidance from
somebody about that thing you didn't know was
gonna happen. So what in this is actually
verified?
What if this entire conversation is something that
you actually monitored and verified? It's all alleged
and hypothetical, maybe.
And this is a theropot that you've stopped?
And this is on
sought guidance on when to carry out the
violence from the father of a local extremist
Islamic preacher who has previously called on American
Muslims to wage jihad.
This is the clumsiest effort in my opinion.
Now, not to say that there weren't efforts
to do this. When this goes to pass
and we can prove this, we'll come back
to it. But this seems flimsy as hell.
The idea, first of all,
carry out the violence, which, by the way,
nothing happened. It's all hypothetical based on what
they claim were code words. So how exactly
do you truly know that was what was
gonna come to pass? Secondarily, a local extremist
preacher,
which, as we'll show
you, is a person who's very prominent. You
support him or not? It's up to you.
Reality is he's got a very large following.
They London
tried to claim he was the, it says
London attacker followed an ISIS recruiter and radical
US preacher, Ahmed Musa Jibril. Is him I
guess the father and the younger person are
all part of you know? Bottom line is
if you look into this, like I always
do, what you get are subjective
overlaps. The idea he's an ISIS recruiter is
a completely intelligence related government opinion. Here's just
Grok, for example.
Does this person on YouTube call for violence?
General generally asking Grok. And the simple point
is, no. He does not explicitly call for
violence. But here's and if you read it
off for yourself, and it says explicitly for
a reason, in no way is he going
do this, do that. The end the end
point comes down to the fact that he's
a Muslim, and then he talks about the
word jihad. And this is what we always
discuss. As he says, promotion of jihad is
a concept. He frequently glorifies jihad as a
religious duty. Because if you understand the word,
if you understand
now look. Could he mean violence? Of course,
he could. But it's like saying the word
revolution or struggle
automatically means terrorism.
That's how dumb this is because jihad is
a word that means struggle, and it can
mean something. A jihad can be a personal
struggle with your religious beliefs. A jihad could
mean protesting against people who are suppressing Muslim
beliefs. A jihad could mean carry on a
violent attack.
Right? So could a struggle or revolution. Like
I've said a thousand times, you could call
it the
the American jihad, the American
what's the other word I always use?
Anyway, the point is that that has the
same overlapping meaning. For them to say that
this guy calling for a jihad means violence
does not track.
Some people can say that and they could
mean that. Other people can say it like
a person who, if you look at the
content, seems to be preaching about Muslim values.
Now look. The idea that you think a
Muslim is the problem, that's the crux of
this issue.
Now if this turns out to be a
terror attack and this guy was absolutely part
of it, then good. Prove it, and we'll
break it down. But what I see is
a bunch of connective tissue between a bunch
of arguments that we have a person who
is a Muslim who they've later claimed is
a violent person because he says words that
connect with Muslim ideology and says the word
jihad and everything Muslim is now a problem
because we you know, think it's just it's
people are losing the plot here. Look into
this for yourself. Don't take my word for
it. I'm not completely, oh, you know, I'm
not a follower of this person's content. I
simply did research on him before I did
this show. But here are some examples.
Raise children with love of jihad. Right? So
you could pretend that means go out and
murder people, or you could pretend what it
means is raise children with the love of
struggling for their beliefs.
That's what that actually means, which, again, saying
it just like that, struggling for your beliefs,
you could argue means carrying out a violent
attack if somebody thought that way. But it
says jihad against the senile,
pharaoh Biden. Again, struggle
politically,
or you can argue he means terrorism. But
to prove this is what matters. Where if
this guy was literally screech on YouTube going
go carry out various attacks, pretty sure YouTube
wouldn't let him be on the platform. But
I wouldn't assume that either.
Emotive support for armed opposition. Right. Okay. Same
point as always.
Armed and,
just like with Israel and Hamas and Gaza,
people who are illegally occupied, which is what
this is about, have the legal right to
arm resistance.
Or the idea that because somebody is a
Muslim, therefore, armed resistance is always terrorism.
Right? So the idea that people were resisting
in the revolution against Britain, does that make
them terrorists? Because, you know, it's it's just
it's such a subjective thing.
But you can read through this for yourself.
You can recognize that it comes down to
ideas that they don't like, that they claim
also mean that. It's like saying Palestine should
be free means you hate Jewish people. That's
the dumbest thing in the conversation, and this
is exactly what we're talking about. So
when you're accusing the extremist preacher, that's what
that comes back to.
Now these people are Muslims.
This person is a prominent preacher in the
area. So if they were to call and
ask about something, well, the what they say
matters, doesn't it? So it says Muhammad Ali
20 and an unnamed juvenile was had a
conversation last week about reaching out to the
father of so called Islamic ideologue to ask
for advice on a timing for a, quote,
good deed. Okay.
So maybe they're trying to be secretive with
their language because they're planning a terror attack,
or maybe they're reaching out to a preacher
about carrying out a if you understand the
Muslim religion, if you talk to Robert about
the reality of this, this is a constant
thing in their lives. And asking the preacher
for guidance on what that should be.
I'm not saying I know that, but you
understand if all you have are pumpkin and
good deed and then other things that Americans
have a right to do, and just because
they slant it with the idea that all
of this means terrorism
you know, if this holds up in a
court of law and this is all there
is, then we're lost.
Because this is ever this is subjective connecting
of dots that don't seem to exist as
it stands now. It's the fifth time I'm
gonna stress that because I don't want it
to be taken as
I know for a fact because I don't.
We have to be objective about this all
the time.
Now it says the feds didn't specifically
identify the Islamic ideologue,
which is interesting to me. Why wouldn't they?
But it says, but described a research paper
on radicalization that clearly named the radical preacher
as ISIS supporter. As so this is the
thing. They call him that.
As far as I could tell, that's not
the reality, but they say that. So that
becomes the reality. And it says according to
the court filing.
Okay. Jibril's father,
who was also, isn't named in the complaint,
founded a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan.
Right. Because we know Muslims and mosques are
evil and bad. Right? So therefore, that makes
the case, doesn't it? Now it says and
for those who don't know the show, please
understand that was being sarcastic.
The juvenile was said to have called the
preacher's father on October 29 to tell him
he intended to do a good deed, but
was unsure of what what day to do
it. Yeah. I mean, you could try to
always make this sound
sneaky and wrong, but without all the context
and the actual chat, you don't know, do
you? You get things quoted out of context
and you or rather in the context they
want you to see it as.
The preacher dad then allegedly told the juvenile
that he shouldn't wait and to carry out
the deed. So if he was talking about
going out and, you know, serving soup at
a soup kitchen, well, that's not very dangerous,
isn't it? But if what he's saying is
hurry up and go kill those people, well,
that becomes bad, doesn't it? This is what
things this is why things need to be
proven. This what they're doing right now is
trying to convince you in the court of
public opinion.
There is no suggestion that the preacher's dad
was aware of the alleged plot,
not even by them, by the way. Still,
it says the so you're you're using him
to make an ISIS connection, but then claiming
he didn't even know what was happening. Still,
the FBI alleged the pair went on to
use the guidance, despite them claiming he wasn't
even involved,
to forge ahead with the plans for the
attack according to the complaint. Right. The good
deed to be carried on a pumpkin day.
It's all super nefarious. Now it says the
younger Jibril was has a history of spewing
hate filled sermons
according to them.
Now you could
argue that what our left right paradigm does
every day. Look at what they're saying about
each other in the current literal left right
paradigm of this country. It's full of vitriolic
hatred and speed just venom
venom. Excuse me.
So the idea that you could argue hate
filled sermons, you know, who knows? Probably. It's
just people are out there all hyped up
on all sorts of things, religion, politics, but
that doesn't mean they're terrorists.
And it says, the preacher also previously called
on Muslims in The US to wage jihad
against the infidel West and for followers to
turn away from what he described as a
watered down American Zionist Islam
that ignores the idea of jihad.
Again, I caution you, peep avid readers of
New York Post probably don't care about the
nuance of the word. The truth is it
does not mean what they keep claiming it
does. It could as one of the many
meanings. The reality is in most Muslims' lives,
it simply means a struggle for what they
believe in. And it gets abused every single
day. In fact, if you understand where the
whole Muslim
suicide vest jihad bomber comes from, it comes
from Zionism.
And that's what this always comes back to.
In fact, I'll play that really quickly
because it's important to understand
the truth.
That doesn't mean there aren't people that carry
out attacks of their own accord. Right? But
it's important to understand
all of this stems from an org an
effort to keep to convince you of exactly
what they're trying to accomplish today. The designers
have used it and brought it, in fact,
to the area. Terrorism as we know it
today, the planting of bombs in marketplaces and
so on and so forth, was, in fact,
introduced into The Middle East by the Zionists
in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
first third of the twentieth century has brought
forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly,
the
horrific and unacceptable
status in The Middle East today of the
state of Israel, which is in fact an
armed garrison state, which now exports more arms
and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
Just just trying to be honest about all
this stuff. Right? Now so the point
is he's saying jihad against the West. Now
you could argue again as always. I'll make
this point 75 times. That means violence, or
you could argue it means a struggle against
what the West is doing to the Muslim
religion, which we can all see right now.
You can literally see what Elon Musk and
these lead the governments are doing with their,
like, rabid,
just disgusting hatred
of certain kinds of people. Look at Laura
Loomer. Look at the rest of these people
and what what they're trying to like, people
that are saying that Muslims shouldn't be allowed
in congress.
There's no misunderstanding what that means. They mean
every Muslim is bad. And just think about
how disgusting that is. That's just the same
as saying every Christian is bad, every Jew
is bad, every anything is bad. If only
one of those things is offensive, then you're
the problem in the conversation.
Now the point oh, I shouldn't say it
like that. If only like, all of those
things are the same sentiment. So either you
look at them as the same thing or
you recognize that you have a blind spot.
Let's put it that way. But then and
then he says, the watered down American Zionist
Islam. I mean, this is such an important
point to be brushed over. What he's trying
to highlight there is that Zionism has taken
a part of Islam and turned it into
a manipulation,
just like they have with Judaism. They're literally
creating the thing that keeps them in their
position.
And it's taken advantage of Muslims and Jews.
Now it says Ali and two other Michigan
suspects
are charged with conspiracy, we talked about this
in the last show, to provide material support
and resources. So they're not even charging them
with being the ones carrying things out. They're
simple and this is my point. These are
the main two from Dearborn, Michigan. And what
they're saying is or was this the ones,
I believe so. The first two is what
I'm referencing in my my point right now
is that
you are you could argue that they were
taken advantage of. They were there
or in the conversation, had no real intention
of doing anything, and they just get somebody
who jumps in, an FBI agent that goes,
oh, Muslims talking about guns, they must be
bad, and ultimately creates a circumstance.
Right? And then you have a guy who
comes in, who creates
more rhetoric, starts talking about weird, you know,
things, and maybe they're going, who the hell
is this guy? And ultimately then go, we
have to stop it now before it happens.
Jump in, arrest everybody, you know, and make
this the case. Now they can deny, deny,
deny, but they're gonna go, but here's the
third guy they're with, and look at how
guilty he is. Then all of a sudden,
they're all guilty because they say that guy's
connected. They've done this over and over and
over. I'm not saying I know exactly what's
happening, but they've done this before.
This and here's what I find even more
revealing.
It says and it so does it they
basically they're charged with conspiracy,
so can sit to discussing planning to provide
the material support and resources to a designated
terrorist organization
and receiving and transferring guns and ammunition for
terrorism. So without the claim of terrorism, they
own guns, they took them to the shooting
range,
and they say they provided material support
to a terrorist organization. So what are we
talking about? In what possible way?
ISIS is what they're talking about. So what
you're saying is they bought guns and planned
something. So show me where they provided material
support for anything other than what you claimed
they were doing, let alone ISIS who doesn't
even seem to be involved in the conversation.
This is a stretch, guys. Unless there's more,
this is a very obvious stretch.
Now the suspects, they say, are accused of
sharing ISIS propaganda
in group chats, which could mean damn near
anything today. The ISIS to them, ISIS propaganda
could mean a Palestinian flag for all I
know. But they're not showing you, so we
don't get to find out. Let's not forget
that right after this, you saw what's her
name? That Sarah something push out that very
bombastic lie about ISIS threatening New York, and
all the major accounts shared it, and it
got deleted because it was false.
But they didn't even check it. They don't
care. I'll show you some more of those
toward the end. Like, there's a there's a
gaslighting happening here. But my point is that
they shared propaganda. Okay. And then it says,
and scouting
LGBTQ friendly locations for a possible attack.
Now here's what's crazy about this. So right
there
make sense of that. So these are supposed
to be lefty terrorists,
but they're aiming for LGBTQ
places?
Right? I mean, that's what they're saying about
this. Right? You can't ultimately, this comes down
to a mashing together of agendas
because it hits all the boxes. Now you'll
even find in the next report, they also
add on Jewish locations. Funny how they just
keep kinda tacking on to the story even
though I don't see anything to back up
most of the stuff.
So here that's the first report.
London attacker oh, that's that's the one we
just talked about before.
So here's the next report. On the ninth,
he shares this today. The leadership of Haba
in the ISIS linked Halloween plot case shows
what real partnership between they just love to
pat each other on the back when, as
far as I could tell, almost nothing has
happened.
It says our team has dismantled,
excuse me,
Dismantled a multi state
ISIS network
before they could strike.
See see see what's unusual about this is
for someone to be praising something before it's
even fleshed out.
You mean I mean, they haven't even indicted
anybody.
And he's going, we broke down a multi
now. You guys you that's not what you
do until you've proven that. And you haven't
proven that until people are charged and found
guilty of a crime.
But see, this guy is so desperate to
flood the thing with anything other than the
fact that he's failing you that I think
they've literally manufactured a plot. That's what they
do. It's probably in some book on the
FBI shelf. It says, our team's dismantling multistate
ISIS network. You know, the same ISIS Trump
says he's defeated 17 times. That's how you
protect America.
Oh, thanks, buddy. But and he does that
by literally highlighting what Fox News says about
what he's doing.
Very, very professional.
HAVA, DOJ moved swiftly and decisively to stop
the lay. So it's ISIS link plot. So
we still get to see it flush out,
but now they're pointing back to what they
did.
It says, federal prosecutors say the FBI has
broken up. Yeah. I love that.
The government claims shouldn't be paying right after
that, you should go, maybe they're lying. Has
broken up an ISIS link network stretching from
Michigan to New Jersey, charging several young men
in a coordinated investigation that allegedly involved plans
for a Halloween mass shooting. Let me ask
you something.
Let's say one of these people is an
agent.
Mossad, CIA, or just a a lackey, a
scapegoat.
One of them
in
what did they say?
Michigan, New Jersey, whatever. Not let's just say
New Jersey. So not the two for Michigan.
Right? The Dearborn plays, they clearly seem to
wanna make a case for. Let's just say
they have one guy in New Jersey they
can literally make a case for, and they
say they're all connected. Now what happens if
they say because he's the group ISIS guy
and I can prove he's in this chatroom
that we create that suddenly they're all ISIS
and every gun and everything they did is
all criminal terrorist activity.
I mean, we've seen them make case like
that before.
So I just, again, stress that we need
to demand more evidence around this. The justice
department announced the new charges Wednesday, calling the
probe a sprawling federal investigation into extremists who
used encrypted messaging to communicate, which is, like,
90% of the well, I don't know. I
shouldn't say it like that.
A huge portion of people in the know
of what's going on in the world are
using I mean, I maybe I take it
back. I think everyone's using WhatsApp and Signal
and everything today, whether those are even truly
secure,
to argue that encrypted chats or owning a
gun or going to a shooting range or
talking about pumpkin day are indicative of anything
other than most Americans is insulting.
US attorney, Habah, said New Jersey defendants,
quote, had pledged themselves to ISIS and were
frequent communication with Michigan's cell. Okay. I'd love
to see the proof of that. I'd love
to see where they pledged themselves. What is
this, a fraternity? Is this some kind of
ISIS joining group online?
I mean, I maybe. I'm just saying, I
think it's weird to argue that they're pledging
themselves to ISIS right now. On top of
that, that they were communication with the Michigan
cell, which right now has never even been
proven. That's a couple of people you arrested
in Michigan. That's all it really comes down
to.
This is crazy to me. What do you
think this looks like to you?
Take a look at this picture.
He's literally holding a samurai sword, which I
can tell you right now does not appear
to be a real one.
So Milo
Seardrat allegedly sent these images to a friend
over social media. He must be a terrorist
or maybe a Halloween costume since what we're
literally talking about is pumpkin day and Halloween.
All this to me does is add less.
Like so what they're trying to do is
make this look like these are all guys
dressing up in their terrorist uniforms to get
ready to carry on a terrorist attack on
pumpkin day.
When he's dressing up, they're talking about going
out and doing a good deed at some
point. They talk about going out on Halloween.
They generally shoot guns and go to the
Jeune Range, which is actually pretty provable. And
then he sends a picture of his Halloween
costume. Now, all hypothetical.
Maybe I'm wrong. But doesn't seem far, far
more likely that all of this points in
that direction than what they're trying to patch
together, especially since they've lied to your entire
life?
Tell me what tell me what you think.
I mean, it's it's just this in particular.
Like, it just it just feel I mean,
that that's why I think it's grayed out
too. Because if there was more defined definition,
I bet you could literally prove what Halloween
costume that was. Agents say they trained at
Detroit area ranges. Right. They went and shot
ranges like any American that owns a gun.
Shared ISIS propaganda and discussed targeting LGBTQ bars
in Ferndale and a Jewish center.
That's weirdly tacked on all of a sudden.
That's been nowhere in the conversation until recently.
Now all of a sudden, because some ADL
members had put the Jewish out of there
too because that's you know? I'm half kidding.
How does it make sense? Right? How does
this make any sense? Other like, so why
would that be the target when they're trying
to kind of overlap this with this leftist
terrorism influence, talking about a connection to Iran
in the last one, now a connection to
an ISIS preacher.
Now here's the interesting part. It says or
one of them. In Newark,
this guy here, who you can't see, funny
how you could see everyone else's stasis, but
not theirs. It says charges of conspiring to
prove provide material support to a foreign terrorist
organization.
Jimenez Jimenez or right because, what is that?
How do you pronounce that again? I think
it's Jimenez.
Hi. No. That's Jimenez.
Also faces an attempt tempt an attempt count
after agents arrested him on Tuesday trying to
fly to Turk to Syria or to Turkey
on his way to Syria.
Okay?
Well, my gut's telling me that this guy
with the actual ISIS flag which actually I
can't tell. That looks more like a Shehada
flag. In any case, which would say everything
by the way, somebody who doesn't even understand
the difference would not actually be pledging to
ISIS.
That's I'm pretty sure that's Shehada, by the
way. How embarrassing. See, this actually adds so
much to me. So this, to me, is
the person they're trying to frame as the
one who's actually the ISIS linked one. The
rest of them seem to be connected by
just being in the chat room. So how
much you wanna bet this turns out to
be somebody who you don't actually see go
to jail? Somebody who ends up flying away
in another country. Right? Whether or not. Like,
that would speak to me, and this is
all, again, it's all hypothetical, to be somebody
who was in this to create the idea
and blame the people they originally wanted to
aim at.
These are the guys
one of the guys anyway. They're from Michigan
who they're claiming was
planning a terrorist attack
with nothing but basic information. And it says
a criminal complaint is merely an allegation. All
defendants are innocent until proven guilty. Okay. Well,
he just shared this from the eighth, but
he's now calling them the people that did
this.
Even though this article that he shared literally
says, we don't know yet. They're not guilty.
Haven't proven. So here's where we are right
now. Everything we just showed you.
Dude, what do you think about this story?
Right? What do you think with this information
so far? Do you feel like that sounds
like a slam dunk?
I mean,
I'll say again.
If we get the full chat, which I'm
almost willing to bet you that doesn't happen.
If if that and and, again, the idea
that they with before, with even Tyler Robinson,
you can't prove that they didn't alter that
or manipulate it. But I wanna see some
at least some kind of conversation
to be able to flush out what the
in what context they were saying pumpkin day,
in what context. And if it really just
comes down to a super benign conversation that
they claim means what they think it wink
wink means, then we need to call this
out
like we're doing now.
Now here is what John Rich came out
and said, and this is just adding to
the larger thing, which they have a very
obvious interest to push this, the team sport
politics players like John Rich. Don't forget what
they were screeching about in the beginning of
Trump's administration. Alex Jones and Rich and all
the rest of them. Iranian drones sniffing for
nuclear bombs, and that was Sean Ryan and
all that big hype that went literally nowhere.
And now Sean Ryan's putting out some bump
overlapping they live
advertisement using Franklin,
downtown Franklin in Tennessee, acting like he's calling
out the totalitarian thing, or he's literally supporting
the growth of it by doing all the
same you know, CIA Sean Ryan. Here's John
Rich. According to my friends at Fort Campbell,
so we could totally trust him, there are
sleeper cells
or there are sleepers oh, that's funny. There
are sleeper cells is virtually every ZIP code
in America.
No. Sleeper cells. That's exactly the narrative they
said before. Now I wouldn't doubt that, but
you wanna know what I believe that means?
Israel.
You can literally prove that. Now, you can
play that clip again because I think it's
important to understand how clearly it is what
they're saying, as well as the Mossad agent
that just literally told you the same thing.
That they have people in every city, that
they can control the flow,
supply chain,
alter it to their favor. Part of the
plan is the reconstruction,
the building, rebuilding of Oh, wait. Wait. Wait.
That's not the right one.
I always I keep doing that.
What was it?
There it is.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way being traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
And remember, the the
ex Mossad just came out in an interview
saying they have infiltrated electronics in every country
in the world.
It just it's just so obvious right now.
And so when he's talking about sleeper cells,
I mean, you could argue it could be
any country. Right? Just like The US probably
does all over the world.
But to argue that this therefore means the
one boogeyman they're trying to point to is
just you're you're deceiving yourself.
He says, this ain't a big city problem,
folks. It's in our backyards. Watch out. Stay
vigilant. Right? Basically,
tell on your neighbor, like, these people are
turning into exactly what they were criticizing about
the left. In fact, if you understand the
way this works, they already were. It's the
same damn thing, guys.
Alan Musrahi points out they're trying to destabilize
Mexico and derail Scheinbaum's
fantastic presidency, whatever you think about that is
his opinion, over Mexico's support for Palestine. Again,
maybe there's different reasons, but I agree there's
an issue there. I also agree that the
US government trying to force the sale of
GMO everything on Mexico is a huge sticking
point for Trump. And so there's many different
factors for why this is happening, but he
writes Israel is poison for literally the whole
world. I agree. Now this is Israeli's ambassador,
Israel's ambassador to Mexico, makes up assassination plot
to blame Iran.
It's not secret, guys. They're trying to do
this everywhere. Even the Trump administration, in the
beginning, at least told you that Iran was
not is not seeking nuclear weapons and does
not have them. Israel is trying to force
the hand. They are literally trying to drive
us. So to to to create what they
want for their
long sought agenda to go after Iran or
whoever they wanna go after. Add it to
the list of countries they're currently bombing and
genociding. So the point is to see that
there's an interest and effort to create that
line. And the US government has never been
more pliable to the Israeli interest. The US
government, not the American people, but the government.
That's sure as hell clear. Here's an interesting
overlap. Valentina Gomez. You see in this maniac
going around, this very obvious Zionist, I mean,
self pronounced,
self declared.
She says, if something happens to me,
which, but let's be clear first of all,
every politician has there's a risk. Right? Somebody
could be crazy, so they could be radicalized
people left and right. Totally not unrealistic to
think you're some risk.
Or podcasters, myself included, anybody. I get death
threats. I get disgusting emails. I just don't
share them all the time because I don't
think it's worth it. I don't wanna give
them any promotion. But I think all of
us get something like that because we're talking
about contentious ideas and people get you know,
there's crazy people out there. That's just to
say that there's a risk in any of
them, especially for a potential politician. She's not
even there yet. So right now, I would
argue that's pretty minimal. But on top of
that, if you're out there screaming about how
there's no genocide, no one's starving, and Israel's
the best in the world, where are you
gonna cause a lot more of that? Not
to say it's justified, but when you're supporting
a genocide, you're probably gonna irritate some people.
Overall,
it's not to say she's not at risk,
but the way that she's using the idea
of that risk and again, no much more
or less than anybody else in politics. And
she says, if something happens to me, it's
the Muslims.
That's not a joke.
Not a fake account.
The Muslims.
Okay. And she goes, I'm requesting Kash Patel
to personally oversee this investigation and provide me
with an FBI security detail. So the very
idea of the detail is what then therefore
proved that you were always threatened by people
that hate Jews or whatever she's trying to
claim right there.
And she goes, Dan Bongino, Charlie Kirk, and
I have the same opinions regarding Islam. See,
they're trying to
rope in Charlie Kirk, the one who was
calling out Israel before they killed him. Now
they want me dead, she says.
So she's trying to use Charlie Kirk and
the lie they're telling about him and all
this person is, in my opinion, the most
obvious example of a Zionist clumsy propagandist trying
to work their way into a position of
power. She goes, Trump was shot. Charlie was
murdered. Conservatives are next.
God. And she my point is she's using
the talking points, but in very clumsy fashion.
That's very Zionist. It's exactly what they do.
And then points to a bunch of people
online saying mean things to her or threatening
her with crimes. Yeah. That happens.
Call them out. If you think it's a
crime to say something out loud or type
something out,
do it. Go after it. Expose the reality
of your lack of free speech beliefs. I
say if something happens to me, it's the
Muslims, she says.
Right. So if anything happens, it was all
the Muslims. They all did it.
I said, how do we anybody take people
like this seriously? I genuinely don't think Americans
are this stupid or this disgusting, but we
all know who is. The
mask is off, guys. Hashtag Judaism
is not Judaism.
The reality is clear on this. There's only
one real, aggressively driving force to just go
all Muslims bad and it's no nobody's confused
about that.
So when she's coming out and saying like,
she could say simply the radical Muslims or
the people on the left or but she
says the Muslims did it. I mean, it's
just so far over the top for exactly
what the agenda is. Loomer and the rest.
It's disgusting.
And people like this, the Randy Fiennes of
the world, they're not fighting for American interest,
guys. They're just not.
So on that same note,
Kovar Alkomacian.
Americans were lied to about the war on
terror since 09/11.
They were in the same bed all along.
Sierra, Syria's Alshira,
Alshara, Jelani arrives in US for official visit.
I bless I guess they're meeting tomorrow or
whatever the day they're meeting.
And even Grok, this guy asked, hey, how
did he come to power?
What was his origin story? So here they
are right now trying to downplay this, the
team sport politics. Both sides, by the way,
since they all seem to support the terrorists
that they've been fighting their entire lives or
claiming they were now that Israel has them
in power in Syria. And here's what even
Grach has to say. Al Sheerah
Jelani, the one that they is the leader
of Al Qaeda,
was born Al Shura in Damascus in 1982,
was also known as Abu Mohammed Al Jelani,
joined insurgents against US forces
in Iraq. Okay. So if you support what
they're doing, point out that Donald Trump is
currently supporting, so is Biden, the guy who
fought and killed Americans. Not the lies they
sell about Soleimani, but the reality of who
was actually doing this. And at the same
time, then you can prove The US was
part of that, but we'll stay we'll still
keep it current.
Serving time in Camp Bucca. He served time
in a military prison, released around 2011.
Al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi
dispatched him personally.
Baghdadi.
The Trump said he killed so many times.
Baghdadi
put him in Syria
to build Jabhat Al Musra. Vanessa Billie and
I have talked about it many times
as an Al Qaeda affiliate
amid what they claim was a civil war.
See, that's even that's such BS. It's an
obvious regime change, infiltration proxy war. It says
he later split from ISIS
ISIS, the group that Kash Mittel says they're
fighting right now, briefly pledged to Al Qaeda
Central, then rebranded to Hayat Tir al Sham.
That's Al Qaeda.
Consolidating
consolidating, excuse me, rebel control in Idlib
through military
gains and pragmatic governance, culminating in Assad's ouster
and his rise to power that they all
currently support, Israel
and everybody in the US government.
That's Grok, by the way, guys. Not that
you should blindly trust Grok, but recognize that
even this random Grok element they're trying to
completely use as propaganda is telling you there's
they're currently working with Al Qaeda.
Here's a clip
of Brett McGurk
telling you what Idlib, which is what they're
referencing. The main location for ISIS is where
he came from
or in Syria anyway,
but it was and why that was a
problem. But now it's okay. But it's okay.
We'll work with him in Syria. Idlib Province.
Look. Idlib Province is the largest Al Qaeda
safe haven since nine eleven tied directly to
Ayman al Suhiri. This is a huge problem.
It's been a problem for some time.
We have shown the spotlight, the international spotlight
on ISIS.
We've been very focused on Al Qaeda in
Idlib Province. Leaders of Al Qaeda that make
their way to Idlib Province often do not
make their way out of there, But we
have to ask a question,
why
and how is Aymban al Suhiri's deputy finding
his way to Idlib Province?
US government. What is happening? Turkey. How are
they getting there? They're not paratroopers.
So and the approach, I obviously will not
talk about anything the US government has done
in certain parts of Syria on this problem.
But the approach by some of our partners
to send in tens of thousands of tens
of thousands of tons of of weapons and
looking the other way as these foreign fighters
come into Syria may not have been the
best approach.
Yeah. Duh. Right? One of the moments of
candid of of being candid. Right? It's just
obvious.
So, again, the reality is that very location
he's discussing in Idlib, we talked about ad
nauseam back when it was happening, but most
people now at the current political field have
no idea about that nuanced conversation because it
sort of woke up with Trump's first administration
and people started paying attention to politics. Not
an insult to anybody. I get why people
don't want to. But recognize that that moment
forward is when there was kind of a
surge of average people diving into all this,
and there's a ton of information about what
they've been doing for years.
Consolidating rebel control in Idlib. That's that is
Al Jelani. That's who they're currently working with
right now, who Trump is welcoming to the
White House. I mean, if you're a Republican,
a Christian, any of you support what you
claim was a war on terror, how in
the world are you okay with any of
this?
It's a knock on Biden and Trump and
the entire US government.
And,
Marwa Osman points out an important overlap to
this,
that Donald Trump lifted the sanctions because Israel
wanted that.
As always, you have a reality that Israel,
whether Trump or Biden or Bush or Obama,
have an or rather the US government is
acting for a foreign power's interest at your
expense.
Hold on.
Oh, I think I've got that. Hold on.
It's right here. Here we go.
Yeah. Go ahead, please. Fox. Will you discuss
the Abraham Accords when you meet with the
president of Syria?
That that's Yolani.
The leader an Al Qaeda leader. That's what
he's talking about. Well, we're gonna meet, and
I think he's doing a very good job.
It's a tough neighborhood,
and he's a tough guy.
And you realize the Trump administration last time
was fighting this guy or so they claimed.
We know that's not true.
This is how dumb they think we are,
that you can literally be pretending to bomb
this guy, to pretending to fight them in
Syria, and then literally work with them now
that Israel gets what they want.
But I got along with them very well,
and a lot of progress has been made
with Syria. That's a that's a tough one.
So, I mean, this is just blatant. I
mean, whether he even knows or not, Trump
just says what he wants you to think.
It's like every politician. Syria is an absolute
complete meltdown. People are being ethnically cleansed. Nobody's
even talking about it.
Israel's building bases. They're overthrowing places. They're building
Hebrew name settlements. They're literally taking over like
everywhere else, and they're ethnically cleansing. They are
murdering people, Christians, all the whites, all across
the country.
But that but, yeah, but they're doing great.
But a lot of progress has been made.
You know, we took the sanctions off at
the request of Turkey, at the request of,
actually, Israel,
at the request of a few different Yeah.
Because Israel's literally occupying the country now. Israel,
and as Jelani even said publicly,
is allowed.
So they're working on behalf of a foreign
power. Not not surprising. Countries,
and we took the sanctions off to give
them a chance.
Yeah. To give Israel a chance. Not they
could've given the Syrian country a chance before
they destroyed it. But now that Israel has
power, will we wanna give Syria a chance?
It's just they're just such disgusting, dishonest people
at its core.
Yeah. I mean, my point is I'm a
very much of the mind that Donald Trump
knows exactly what he's doing right there. He
knows exactly what he's lying about.
As she writes, Trump just said it out
loud. We lifted the sanctions based on Israel's
request. And with that one line, the entire
illusion
for those who ever painted Nusra as a
pillar of justice for Palestine collapsed.
Syria,
once the beating heart of Arab dignity, has
been handed over on a silver platter to
Zionism and Western imperialism.
The so called Syrian revolutionaries who cheered for
freedom while waving NATO's flag can now watch
their poster boy, Abu Mohammed al Jelani, the
washed up terrorist once hunted by The US
for a $10,000,000 bounty. They only took the
bounty off when he took over Syria. How
insane is that? On a dime.
Being rebranded as tough, pragmatic leader because Tel
Aviv said so. This is what your revolution
led to.
Terrorists turned Western assets, Wahhabi,
Saudi Arabia
or, you know, Wahhabist
ideology.
And then they they turned media darlings, a
nation gutted, looted, and occupied by foreign powers
that once swore to liberate it. How utterly
shameful.
And the social justice warriors, which, by the
way, are all the right right now. I
want you to really think about that. The
reality of who currently are the social justice
warriors, that's the right. Not every one of
them, but all the same woke right people
who are out there screaming about what's right.
It's the same idea, guys, from a different
angle.
And, you know, it's important to call them
out. The John Riches and the people like
that, they are the snowflakes. They are the
broflakes and the and the social justice warriors
of the current situation.
And it says that the Twitter nationalist, the
fake revolution mouthpieces, they'll still preach about, justice
and human rights while these their idols kneel
before the very empire they once claimed to
resist as they chopped off the heads of
Alawites, Christians, Druze, and Shias in Syria.
Gehlani is the perfect emblem of this moral
decay, a man who traded his past and
ongoing terrorism for PR interviews and Western approval.
And for and this is the such a
perfect point to realize that these are the
people that have always been doing this. Some
of them buy into it. Usually, the people
that are abused, but the leaders like Saudi
like like Mohammed bin Salman admitted
that they that they are the ones that
created these networks, but in some cases lost
control of them. The truth is, though, at
the and what they said was the leaders
didn't even believe the ideology
because this is where it comes from.
It's just sad how clear this all can
be, and yet we and, you know, people
like us will scream it, but the Joneses
and all the rest will continue to push
you down the two party paradigm.
It says, for Syria's sake, for what's left
of Arab world's sake, it's time we call
this what it is, a complete, humiliating surrender
to Zionist imperialism
wrapped in a language rev of revolution
and no. What damn revolution? This is sad.
Now Jack Maxey points out, this mother ever
murdered Americans himself.
But because Israel needs a proxy, Trump will
invite this POS to the White House.
I grow to viscerally hate Trump more, he
says, with every traitorous act who I believe
is a Republican or at least a overlapping
support. War room.
The point though,
he killed Americans, guys. Are you America first?
Right? Do we care that there's an American
in Israel's prisons right now that was born
in Florida for some year? No. Who cares?
America first.
Well, that doesn't mean what you think it
means, apparently, if you understand where this current
administration is going.
So who are they going after? Right?
I mean, I briefly point this out again.
I'm gonna do this continually until somebody's arrested.
Anybody. Whether it's Comey, James, anybody. Anybody, Bolton.
But I don't think that's gonna happen.
The reality to me seems to be that
they're going after you. Now this guy, when
he's speaking, I swear, my opinion, but I
feel like he's almost borderline laughing like a
duper's delight about how dumb they think we
are. This Zionist
is actively working. I mean, remember, he's the
one that seems to be above Marco Rubio.
He's an adviser that seems to be leading
the charge, whether immigration, whether any number of
very alarming like Venezuela, for example.
Why do you think that makes sense? You
understand this guy is a tried and true,
a diehard Zionist who puts Israel's interest above
yours every day of the week,
And then uses things like this to make
you think that you're being that you're
winning. How many times can you say this?
How many times can you say, Comey and
Clapper and Brennan? Oh, we got some big,
big, big information coming down. They're all gonna
go to jail two months ago.
Well, if you have if you call Obama
a traitor one more time, and let's see.
Like, I agree, and I think they all
should go to jail.
I don't believe it's gonna happen because these
people are playing you.
Well, and then Clapper Yeah. Go ahead. Brennan,
Obama,
Monaco,
all conspired
together, all work together
to try to sabotage,
undermine, unravel
the democratic institutions
and structures of this country.
The Russian gate Yeah. But but Trump's got
plenary authority though. Right?
Our processes and democracy and freedom, but Trump
could do whatever he wants whenever because he's
he's a complete hypocrite. And he and he
that's why he laughs at you. You can
listen to him speak, and he doesn't believe
all of the words he gives you when
he tries to criticize the Democrats.
It's insulting.
Be smarter than this.
Hoax. The Russia gate conspiracy.
Yep. And all of the assaults against our
liberties that went with it. The predawn raids,
the handcuff Yeah. You mean like they're all
doing right now? Right now against Democrats, against
Americans, but it's okay because they're doing it
to fight the bad thing. So we can
do the wrong thing to go after the
wrong thing. Perfect. It makes sense. Thing of
innocent Americans,
the the espionage against president Trump's campaign and
staff.
You get it. Guys, I can't even list
I can't even stomach listening to this guy
saying it. This is so insulting.
Okay. Good. Let's just say we agree with
everything. When are they gonna be arrested, Matt
Miller? Or sorry. I mean, just as dumb
as Matt Miller, but Stephen Miller? Well, as
I simply he he writes, I cannot find
words harsh enough to condemn the conduct.
Do something about it. Our enemies are domestic.
You see how much they're pushing this? This
is John Strand.
He says I I simply said, cool story.
Arrest someone or shut up.
And even he said a 100%.
The point is that everybody wants this, but
it's it seems my thing is, well, how
are you gonna be a 100% if you
seem to constantly still support the statement? How
many times can you float this idea before
you recognize nothing's gonna happen? Here's a Trump
supporter, and he says, Pam Bondi I think
so. Pam Bondi and her DOJ prosecutors
were handed
enough evidence
on a silver platter to put people away
for life, beginning with Tulsi Gabbard's DNI classified
classified
presser. And there's not been one single arrest.
I mean, I agree. I think you can
prove that what they did in Russiagate was
completely illegal, same with a ton of other
things.
Nobody's been arrested.
78,000,000
of us who voted for Trump were asking
why the hell not. See? Yeah. So I
I was forgetting why I thought that, but
so he says it right there.
And I simply said because you were lied
to. And if you think Bondi is responsible,
you'll continue to be played.
Here?
You've seen this before. Another one of these,
you know, Charlie's voice rising. It's got, what,
182,000
followers that have, like, thirty seconds of being
there because they just say Charlie's name and
then just say Trump MAGA, Trump Patriot, and
everyone goes, hey, retweet, retweet. Just it's just
kinda sad. I'm really I argue a lot
of it's algorithmic and just what the platform
is promoting, but he's this is about the
same thing. You already saw the clip. They're
just reposting this again yesterday. This clip's been
around for this is not new. They just
this is what happens. They go breaking, bam.
And this is a clip from a week
ago, wherever it is. And it is her
saying, I'm more than ready to show the
evidence. Governor Gavin Newsom is being investigated for
criminal schemes. Yeah. He's a criminal. Okay. Now
arrest him
or investigate and show us the results. But
nothing continues to happen.
You get the point, guys. I could go
over all of them. I already showed you
how Comey's investigation appears to be set up
to fail. Then they're gonna blame Democrat
radical judges when reality, the case was completely
flimsy to start, which is why the Trump
guy said no, and they fired him for
it. He wasn't a Democrat. He's somebody who
was, I'm not gonna look like an idiot
for you, and he got fired.
Now five times August says, how many times
can a guy talk of corruption and hoaxes
and scams and never hold anyone accountable
or any of it before you realize it's
all just an act? See, he was supportive
in the beginning and he just has principles.
He recognized he's being played. I'd like to
believe that's most people. They just don't all
have a large account to show
it. He says it's branding and marketing. It's
breadcrumbs.
Exactly.
It's just enough to keep you hanging in
there a little bit longer.
A little bit longer. A little bit longer.
Every single time. Stop falling for it and
free yourselves.
Look at this guy.
I mean, it's just insane. Especially to him
too. Of all people, somebody who was very
much pushing back, this guy says, you sound
vaccinated.
That's all they can do. People that are
blind supporters of the team just need to
use partisan arguments because you must be a
Democrat.
He says, I'm not. Trump is though.
How perfect is that? That's what he says.
Look at that.
See? See, this is the kind of people
we're dealing with. So he goes, Trump is
though, because Trump says and has said repeatedly
that he took a shot. Right? He goes,
you're stupid if you actually believe that. So
now you're willing to take your so Trump's
lying to you about that. You know for
a fact. Right? It's just the the what
you think you know, which is not proven,
is the absolute fact. And what you can
prove is not true because Trump said no.
People are children in the partisan game, guys.
As James Corbett, which I'm glad to see
on Jimmy Dore yet again,
he says,
this is just Jimmy Dore posting this. James
Corbett tells Jimmy the coming civil war
will not be red versus blue or democrat
versus republican.
And and I know James would have to
argue he's not saying we know for a
fact that's coming, but the idea of the
possibility building, I agree with him. It's not
about left and right. He says it's not
about left versus right. It's up, down. It's
the masses against the oligarchs, the billionaire class
that actually runs everything, and that's going to
be the civil war if and when. He
in fact, he says the oligarchs have already
launched this war even though most people have
not yet caught on. Now that I agree
with. They're waging I mean, they always have.
As James and I have talked about many
times over the years, they're waging their war
against you. It's always been that way. Now
whether we decide to wage a war back,
well, that's what that would create. The point,
though, is that at this moment in time,
they are waging their war on you like
they always have. It's just become I think
it feels like a final step.
And he says fifth generation warfare is essentially
the governments of nations warring against their own
citizens economically with biohazards and biosecurity threats and
with information warfare.
100%.
Now funny overlap to that.
See if I can get that to come
up. There it is.
Oops. As we just talked about this, and
even the image will bring back exact moments.
This whole burning
cyber truck in front of the Trump Tower.
Alright? The title was fifth generation warfare. Drones,
fog, false flags, and political destabilization. Remember all
the hype of the drones and the fog
and all that stuff? Jones and the rest
were pitching this and the Iran seeking bombs.
All that was all at the same time.
And just it was just a bunch of
hype, guys. I mean, over and over this
happens. Fifth generation warfare is what we're experiencing.
And it's not just the governments. It's the
people that we keep pointing to. It is
the team sport players. James has been on
this longer than anybody.
Now,
I believe, as I think most people can
see if they care to look, that most
conservatives,
most Americans
are finally starting to see through it. The
two party illusion. It is falling apart.
Now here's an article from USA Today
simply quoting an r something written by a
conservative.
November 8,
I voted for Trump. I feel completely swindled.
Now, of course, you could argue
that he's a secret Democrat or he never
supported Trump or he's got Trump's danger syndrome.
You can always assume whatever you want. For
all those people, you're not you know, you
can assume over there. We wanna have an
honest adult conversation about what we can prove.
The reality is you could always say that.
You could do that, but the facts show
you something different.
Right? Most people, even Candace Owens will show
you again with large influences starting to say
that he is well, it's not again, that's
why I hate I always get mad at
myself for even doing this. It's not It's
objectively clear that he has not followed through.
So we could put the objective and say,
well, you know, we disagree on what he
did and Trump's promises kept. The truth is
you can prove he has not. It's insulting
to say otherwise.
That's why people like candidates are starting to
tip that over, and I'm glad to see.
I'm skeptical where that goes.
My point in all of this is that
this seems whether or not this is a
propaganda tool, you know as well as I,
there are conservatives that are feeling this way
right now. So let's not play the game
where we try to go, oh, it's USA
Today. They're probably we all know that happens.
We know they're fake news. We know the
mainstream. But consider the point regardless because we
know this is happening.
This is what the person wrote. A year
after the president election, I feel completely swindled.
I am a libertarian who voted for Donald
Trump in 2024.
The first time I ever voted for a
Republican for president because he made efforts to
listen to address our concerns. I mean, feigned,
anyway.
He came into he came to our nation
national convention, promised to stay out of wars
and slash government spending. Right. So he came
and said what you wanted to hear.
I mean, this is what we need to
get to, guys. I'm glad they're seeing it.
I'm trying to make fun. The point is
that he's going, I see it now. I
was swindled. Now
see that in a big sense. Don't then
jump to the next Republican you like. Don't
then jump to the next Democrat
you like. Recognize
politicians
lie,
and they always will. Their job is to
I mean, even if that isn't always the
case, it's in your interest to assume that.
It's in your interest to go, he might
be lying, so let me check. Let me
look to the source material. Let me verify
their claims. Let me hold their feet to
the fire because they could be lied to.
I say this all the time. An honest
person would demand that of you. Like I
do. Right? Demand I check what I'm saying.
Don't blindly listen to me. Look at the
source material. Come to your conclusion about it.
So in this case, he came and said,
this is what you wanna hear.
So don't fall for that again. Even if
he means it, maybe he can't maybe he
won't be able to follow through. Basic logic.
And he says,
but none of what he promised happened. Exactly.
The only thing Trump did do was pardon
Silk Road founder Ross Olbright, which I agree.
Was I I absolutely
agree with that. Funny how when that first
happened, what did Derek and I say when
it first happened? That's probably gonna be the
only thing. That was a that was a
a,
what's the word I'm looking for? A throw
you a bone. Right? They wanted that to
start with that point.
Nothing else seems to have happened.
And it says he says, which I'm grateful
for, but he has fallen completely flat on
his face on all his other promises.
Entirely agree.
Now he is going after libertarians like Thomas
Massie, whatever you think is, you know, whether
libertarian or not, or Rand Paul, both representing
Kentucky, a complete betrayal.
Who both, by the way, very clearly demonstrate
far more America first principles than anybody in
his administration,
which most Republicans are starting to say, by
the way. Now it says, what Doge found
in terms of cuts was great. Now see,
that's flatly I completely disagree with that. What
Doge has if you look at what they
provably found, not what he claimed, not what
he incorrectly
wrote down on that website that doesn't exist
anymore,
They lied to you guys. They didn't cut
costs, they lied. There were things they cut,
half of that was re spent somewhere else.
They removed funding that was already going away,
for example. Or, you know, it's
very easy to prove.
On top of that, it just kinda went
away and stopped, and they never even really
tried. Now the spending's higher, government's bigger. You
got played. It never even went in the
direction they claimed it did. He says what
Doge found in terms of cuts was great.
But right after that came the one big
beautiful bill and continuing resolution that undid all
of that progress. Now again, there really wasn't
even that much progress. They very much just
moved things around, including USAID and the State
Department. But overall, even if you think they
did good things, they ruined it all with
that, which is what Massey and Rand and
plenty of others were saying. And it says
what doge,
oh, and he goes on to say the
one the big the the bill is one
of the largest spending packages in recent US
history, which was tons of money for the
web manufacturers of merchants of death and all
the problems that we claim we're trying to
stop.
Who, the candidate who ran on cutting wasteful
spending and is also going after Massey and
Paul because they recognized it for what it
was.
Simple.
What Doge tried to do was great and
a and I am supportive, he says, of
the spending cuts, and I would be if
that's what they were actually doing.
That did come of it, which really was
nothing. But the fallout from the bill put
a damper on all the great progress made.
Musk rightfully called it an abomination.
Yeah. He did, even though he wasn't really
changing much and he still supports Trump. Feels
like a game to me, quite honest. Feels
like it was about AI and getting access
to all your personal data, which he gave
to Israel. Very easy to prove. If the
president elections were held today, he says with
the same candidates, I like this. He goes,
I would sit out.
You see? I'm telling you guys, this is
where we are. It's not, oh, now democrat.
It's people are going, I see it.
If this was if we were back there,
I wouldn't remember when we were doing that?
Going, everybody,
vote no one. Protest.
Abstain on the record. And what did we
get from anomaly and all the rest? You're
black pill. Purity test. And guess what many
of them are saying now? Oh, look at
Trump betraying us. Yeah. Too bad you weren't
you know, imagine if we had got the
vast majority of Americans going, come all in,
Trump, or the same thing, and you're and
we don't we're not gonna participate in your
stolen, manipulated election.
The government is not even participating. They're giving
us an illusion, a theater show. We don't
believe it. Now I don't know what that
would lead to. I do know that change
would come, though. Maybe bird, maybe good, maybe
bad. The point is we all want this
to go we want this to shift. I'm
gonna see I'm just being honest about that.
Even positive actions could lead to negative things.
The end of the day is that we
need to stop the usual, the status quo.
And I would argue that people in the
world would
support that, that this would cause radical change.
We probably just see them start changing amongst
themselves because they don't wanna lose power. You
will see presidents get impeached. You will see
congress start suddenly remembering they have powers war.
You would see that change.
That's what I believe anyway. And I just
we right now, with him now saying I
would sit out. I wouldn't try to even
vote for Greenberg. I would just it's and
that's where not sit out. I would argue
if it was legally the reality that should
be, you could go, I abstain. I'm gonna
check abstention, and I want you to tally
and register abstentions on the screen next to
everything else. And if you have 99%
abstains
abstentions from what happened, the world would see
that we are all aware of the lie,
that we have been stolen from, that we
are being run by Israel, whatever it is.
Telling you guys, I really want people to
try to recognize that I'm this is my
opinion, but I think the facts back up
the reality that not only is a two
party illusion breaking down, most people see it,
and people are not only going looking for
another candidate, they're starting to go, who is
that guy talking about vote no one? I'm
telling you something's shifting.
Quote, it says, our rather continues. I am,
however, extremely like to vote on the upcoming
twenty twenty six midterms
and the twenty twenty eight general elections. So
feels that way about last election, but still
interested in voting. It's a positive step, but
not completely there yet, in my opinion. He
says, I feel that I need to do
what I can to ensure liberty advances, which
includes voting for Libertarian Party candidates or candidates
who have Libertarian values. Yeah.
If you hey. Look. I've always if you
feel voting makes a difference, then you go
for it. I mean, you do whatever you
think makes a difference. Don't just don't do
it because I'm of the mind that has
been stolen from us. But at least consider
that's the case and find
recognize that voting is probably the least, impactful
thing you can do politically.
Now, I know people disagree with that. The
reality is in a actual state of society
that is act or rather, you know, when
we're forced to live in a state of
society, which I don't wanna be in. I
wanna be in a world with no government.
But since we are forced to live within
it, and we do have a situation where
you have a constitutional reality, which in some
way tries to check and balance that system.
Right? The reality is you can see the
the the power in that if it actually
functions. Where we are is is a situation
where the the power structures have recognized
how that dampered their own growth and power,
and so they long since have taken that
away.
We can see it, whether it's voting machines.
I mean, I'd go off on this forever.
But here is Candace Owens saying basically the
same thing, that she was that we were
tricked by Trump.
I I agree with her. Now question whether
or not this is her using, you know,
recognizing the writing on the wall, opportunism, ask
the same thing for me. Ask whether or
not I'm doing that, but question everybody, right?
Nonetheless, I only say that because I do
have skepticism, but I do agree with what
she's saying. And I'm glad that somebody with
this much reach is starting to put a
question mark over the two party illusion and
the party in general.
Infiltrate and convince us that this is the
same party while we get gaslit
about everything that's happening. Like I said, you
lost the party. Maga got fractured, not when
Tucker Carlson
interviewed Nick Fuentes,
but when Donald Trump looked at us in
our faces and said, Epstein who? That's when
it was game over.
Because Israel first is a cancer cell. It
is a cancer cell, left or right, to
everything and everyone
that wants to play around with it. It
is a radical
psychosis that has manifested itself within both parties,
and it is so radical.
And in case you missed it, yesterday,
they started attacking
Brett Cooper. Brett Cooper, 23 year old, bubbly
Brett Cooper.
She makes the majority of her videos dedicated
to pop culture.
Yes. She she covers
things that are, I would say, mainstream
politics.
Nothing too daring.
Never talks speaks about Israel.
And she did her part, by the way.
Zionists wanted her to do her part and
encourage New Yorkers to get out and vote
against mom Donnie. But it's not enough.
Donnie.
But it's not enough, of course, because this
is a radical ideology. You give them 100%.
You even say one critique, and they don't
wanna break bread with you. They wanna destroy
you, and that's what they wanna do to
Brett Cooper.
Done with Donald Trump, or could you see
a way that you would end up perhaps
voting for him? Oh, you can't run again,
obviously. But would you support him publicly again?
So I wanna be clear. I don't regret
voting for Donald Trump above Kamala. I think
he was the better candidate.
Certainly, a bet And that's why I still
question.
I just think that's insane. Think about where
we are and what she's saying about him.
And now you're gonna say, like, I agree.
I think she's the exact same problem.
No. I just think that's a weird thing.
We are still driving people into the two
party paradigm. Now Now maybe she believes that.
Maybe that's what she thinks is the best
choice.
But I think we know what that really
represents at the end of the day whether
she believes is true or right or not.
So consider that. Two party illusion is the
problem. They're candidate above, Joe Biden.
But what I will say is that he's
been a chronic disappointment
and, I feel embarrassed that I told people
to go vote for him because this wasn't
going to happen and it is happening. Okay.
Wait a minute though. So how would you
feel embarrassed to have go vote for him
if you say you'd still vote for him
over Kamala?
So what does that mean?
In what world does that make sense? Those
things don't equal each other. See? It's just
skepticism there. Again, I still argue I'm happy
to see them pointing this out because it
is what people need to understand.
Right? That these none of these people are
on your side.
But I I I just think that the
picture of politics in America is going to
look very differently because of his actions. So,
I don't know where we go from here.
I really don't. But I this is not
the candidate that I voted for. Okay. Now
I agree. And I or rather I in
the sense that what she's really kinda highlighting
is that what the what the presentation
was is not what you're getting.
We all can acknowledge that. This is what
I'm trying to show people when you get
this Eric Doherty's and Nick Sorters out there
seal clapping about whatever Trump just said. And
everything's the best, and we're winning, and everything's
gonna be John Rich, all the rest of
them, they're all doing the same kind of
thing. This, at the very least, is an
honest going, yes. They're all BS. We all
know we're not getting what was promised. We
all know that. And it's the same thing
for the last administration, guys. We just have
to start being honest and consistent and holding
all of them to the feet their feet
to the fire.
Now, this is what,
Godfrey random account put out. I followed him
because of this.
Leading report says breaking 62% of US adults
say the two major political parties are doing
such a poor job, the third party is
needed. Ah, and here is where I've been
I mean, we all have kind of been
waiting for the, you know, Elon Musk America
party kind of a shoe to drop. Right?
Where, in my opinion, it's not a new
good thing. It's the last ditch effort to
pretend that we are doing something new when
it's just an extension of the two party
illusion. You know, whatever. Same kind of thing
The UK deals with. It's not it's the
same, you know, you can call it a
false binary, but it's more than two choices.
Right? It's a false it's a false choice.
You got all of the things that lead
in the same direction at the end of
the day or just some variation therein that
there's one in in this case, in their
their case, the EU, which is really the
power structure. But what we're seeing here, just
the report, take it for what you will.
I agree with this in a general sense,
whether that can be backed up statistically, is
that most Americans are aware that we're being
screwed every which way from everybody. They're all
at the left and right. They all look
going in the same direction. We're still aiming
at the left regardless of what Trump is
saying.
And what go for Godfrey points out is
the whole system is crashing
down. Everybody realizes both parties work for Israel.
Now this is a very common sentiment right
now. I even on this platform that is
kind of hell bent on keeping you trapped
in the paradigm.
Think about what that shows you.
And I simply said, exactly. Essentially, my show
for the last year. But, of course, the
system won't let both see that. Now when
I argue, what you're gonna see probably, if
this ever eventually gets to where it needs
to get, is that you're gonna get a
large like like a canvas starting to or
a tucker who starts to come out and
say, this is the thing. And, you know,
rec that that's when you get that momentum
because it can be controlled into the next
manipulation.
That's how I see it anyway.
But that's why you're here because we talk
about these things a year before it ever
comes to pass.
Five times August
says well, Alec Zack says the CDC the
CDC is still corrupt to the core. It
is. The NIH is still corrupt. It is.
The FDA is still corrupt. It is. The
same goes for the FBI, CIA, etcetera.
Same goes for the entire government. That's why
I like Alec. I've seen no significant changes,
he says, towards the direction of health, peace,
freedom since Trump took office ten months ago.
In fact, it's far the opposite.
I've only seen the same technocratic, tyrannical, centralizing
agenda continue to march along. See, he has
principles. I honestly, to this day, I feel
like I respect Alex Ek more than most
people on this platform because of our differing
opinions in some cases, but because he is
so absolutely adherent to his principles. You have
to respect that. Trump and the Republican party
fooled all of you, he says, and it's
time for you to admit it. Now realize,
to make this clear, it's not just because
we agree. If he had said this is
what he thought was happening, then it was
the reverse,
and then he stood by that sentiment to
this day because of something, you know, like,
my point would be regardless of whether we
had agreed or not, his consistent
stance on his principles is what I'm pointing
to. Whether or not we agree, it just
happens that we do in this case. And
my point is you go back to There's
plenty of things he argued in the past
that I wasn't in the same mindset of,
but I value his adherence to his principles.
It means a lot.
And here is what five times August said,
but no tax on tips, man. We're winning.
Right? I mean, that's what you
get. Yeah. And there's a even even though
no tax on tips is not even really
what happened, it's the point is it's a
it's a Ross Albright when everything else is
going the wrong direction. Right? It's it's a
it's a steam it's a
pacification.
As Jason Baster points out, Trump MAGA two
point o recap one year later.
MAGA equals MAGA.
Make Israel great again. $2,900,000,000,000
debt in September.
Backroom deals with Pfizer, more than one. Extra
extrajudicial
murders at sea, Epstein files release cover up,
CBDC stablecoin bait and switch, peace president department
of war, green lit Palantir surveillance empire.
Pretty much, guys. And there's more you could
add too. Now Jason is back to doing
some clips for TLav, so you'll be seeing
some of those coming out.
An anomaly says if Kamala won the election,
Republicans would still have the illusion that Trump
would save us, and he just made a
mistake during COVID. This is what I think
is interesting here.
This is a general sentiment within the two
party illusion. Right? The other style they can
or rather just in the safe case, I
guess, kind of his side. Republicans just don't
wanna see it. Well, yes, in a general
sense, it's always the case. I don't think
that's I think that a lot of things
have changed over the years. But right now,
when you actually I'm of the mind that
most conservatives are truly starting to see it.
And now you're getting large accounts like even
Candace start to call it out. And at
that point, he jumps in and goes, they're
not gonna see it. I almost feel like
he's trying, maybe inadvertently, I don't know, to
keep people within the two party illusion.
He goes, that was necessary. The real MAGA
starts when patriots realize Trump is a puppet
and overrated.
Well, yeah. It's very easy to yell that
out when it's easy to see now. I
said, so then it's exactly what we were
trying to get people to see before the
election when you were calling us black pill.
Remember that? Maybe we can stop playing partisan
games and truly fight for liberty now. I
guess we'll see the next partisan game.
Right? So when the next thing comes along,
we'll see where his stance is. We'll see
when the next election is. Right? We'll see
if people like that can actually recognize the
party illusion and stop playing within it. That
statement is not a good indication.
The patriotic blonde, who was very, very much
a Trump supporter who is now calling it
out, says, so instead of making housing more
affordable,
let's just enslave consumers for life. Welcome to
your fifty year mortgage. This is the weirdest
thing I've seen in all this. The act
they they I mean, it's all it's like
I mean, it's literally selling you something that
is the opposite, like it's a bad thing
framed as positive.
Why that makes sense to anybody? I don't
know.
And I'll just read what people's the statements.
Everyone's comments on this are pretty much what
I'm thinking right now. So she just calls
it out. Wanna plan? Like, this is ridiculous.
Of course, Eric Daugherty is like, the best
thing ever. Trump's the best. As usual,
here's I mean, to me, it seems absurd.
The idea that you're gonna tell us that
giving changing from a thirty to fifty year
mortgage somehow is is winning or in your
interest. Why do I wanna be more in
debt? Why do I wanna give the bank
longer control over my life and my cabin?
It's not in your interest. It's in the
interest of the oligarchy.
Thomas Massey says, how is here, enjoy this
fifty year mortgage different from you'll owe nothing
and be happy,
or you'll take it or like it, whatever
he says there. It's not, guys. I've how
long have I been saying that? How long
have a lot of us been saying that?
It's the same agenda with a different flavor.
Here we go. But you won't hear that
from the team sport politics players.
Chris Raziani says government owns every home as
it is, which I constantly point that out.
Property tax is the rent paid to governments.
I agree. You don't own anything if you
start to pay the government. If you don't
pay that, they take it back. That's not
own. I we don't really own things in
this country anymore. It's just be sure to
pay your rent if you want to keep
your home. A fifty year mortgage will mean
the bank will own your home for fifty
years. I argue again with I agree with
them even beyond that. Pat property tax and
everything else. It's not the reality.
But he goes bank and state. You will
own nothing and be happy. That's just Trump
posting this. Great American presidents. Thirty year mortgage,
Trump four fifty here. Right. Because I think
somebody said, right? Because it's the the years
of the mortgage that
identified the great presidents. Right? This doesn't make
sense, really.
But as Patriotic Lawan also points out, Israel,
that was Andrew Torba from from GAB,
Israel gets $50,000,000,000.
They on top of everything else they've gotten,
and you get a fifty year mortgage. She
says, what a plan.
It's crazy.
Now, Mel points out, Americans, we'd really like
some affordable housing. Right? That's what everyone's calling
for. And then Trump says, well, best I
can do is an extra twenty years of
usury. It's just perfect.
I don't know. I just it's almost kind
of humorous why they thought this would go
over well. I think this was a very
large misstep. As far as I could tell,
most people on even on this platform are
not having this.
Here is somebody saying, pro Trump president Trump's
fifty year mortgage explained. This is a good
quick little graphic. Twenty twenty one, five hundred
thousand dollar house, 3% interest rate.
Payment, $2,108
a month. Mortgage, thirty year mortgage, total interest
payments, 2,000 oops.
Oh, dang it.
Sorry. I hit something on accident there.
Mortgage, thirty year mortgage, total interest payments, total
comes out to $257,887.
$260.
So I was 260
yeah. That grand.
$20.25.
$500,000
house. Same price for the house. 7% interest
rate.
$3,008
a month.
Fifty year mortgage comes out to just over
a million dollars. Right? With with all of
the interest. Right? So be that's think of
the for extra twenty years, that's more interest
that you pay over time. Now you have
the option to pay more. Right? You could
pay over the top what you owe. Most
people don't. So this isn't in this is
crease this is
squeezing out more
wealth from people that are already below the
poverty line, or people just that aren't in
the upper class. Like the there is no
middle class. There is the point o 1%
and damn near everybody else in a very
small group in the middle. Simon Dixon says
this is absolutely insane. This is a trillion
dollar bailout
for banksters.
Trump is a is a gift to the
financial industry complex. He has done everything
BlackRock wants him to do.
I'm going to have to create a video
on this one, he says. And he goes
over the numbers too. Same thing.
It's over a million dollars lifetime interest. Like,
they're they're they're near they're I mean, he
actually puts this one at more, about 500.
So even his opinion, it's a double the
amount.
But overall,
BlackRock.
I mean, this goes back to the we
talked about this during COVID nineteen and Biden,
or rather this was Trump, but also Biden
through. Same thing. But Trump originally in the
last administration,
the BlackRock takeover of American interests.
Actually, no. I take that back. Was this
I mean, either way, the point is that
continued through. And even to this day, what
you can clearly prove is that BlackRock and
Larry Fink
are part of Trump's inner circle,
which should matter to everybody who jump at
everything BlackRock owns until suddenly Trump's high fiving
with them and we just act like it
doesn't matter anymore. How do we not see
stuff like that? So this is the reality,
that BlackRock and the rest and Larry Fink
and every other moneyed interest were being sold
out to the highest bidder.
Tom Rentz, a Trump supporter, says, is Trump
actually just taking orders directly from the WEF?
So instead of blocking BlackRock and WEF from
buying all the housing, which is exactly what
they were saying during Biden's administration,
He jacks up the prices. He wants us
to never own our homes. Fifty years to
own your home.
You'll own nothing and be thankful for it.
I'm sorry, but the digital ID, having Bill
Gates, Borrowell in the White House, Genius Act,
continuing MRA support are now another gift for
the globalist banking cabal. Everybody
sees
it. Trump needs to fire everyone and get
back to MAGA. Oh, except you then go,
but Trump's saving us, and he's tricked. Come
on, Tom. You can't Trump needs to fire
everybody. Trump's the one doing it all, man.
Why can we not get there? You can
call it all of that. And then yet
at the end, still go, but Trump's the
guy. What the f?
They're all lying to you. From Kamala to
Biden to Trump to Bush to Obama, they're
all doing the same thing. And how do
we not see that by now?
Time backflakes.
Fifty year mortgages where you'll pay the bulk
of the interest on the front end and
stay shackled to the bank for the rest
of your life isn't freedom.
It's another form of debt slavery. Now, on
top of all that, Trump has the nerve
to come out and say it'll give you
$2,000
for one just a one time $2,000 payment
while offering 5,000 the first time.
He says the $2,000 socialist gesture, which is
exactly what they call it under
Biden, is throwing peanut shells on the cage
floor for stupid monkeys.
He's right. Now not only the money that
you're talking about, the fifty year mortgage, we're
talking about all the stuff that's already happened
with the tariffs, with increased costs. And now,
he's gonna throw crumbs on the ground one
time and say, That's just you winning?
He's a dividend of at least 2,000 a
person, not including high income people. On top
of that, it's not even sure it's gonna
happen.
But this is a floated idea that he's
already been dangling out there for a long
time when it was more before.
This is just insulting at the end of
the day. As Patriot Blonde again says, only
Trump could promise you $5,000
then only deliver 2,000 after raising the cost
of everything to give you that $2,000
dollars tax you on 40 percent of that
$2,000
and tell you that it's because he's making
America great again. Hashtag the art of the
deal.
And this is John Pold saying, no. Trump
can't issue $2,000 checks without congress.
But, you know, tons of things you can't
do without Congress that every administration
always seems to do. Just recognize it's illegal.
Alright? Sort of like going to war without
congressional approval. They all do it. No one
stops them. But he made the point as
the same, though. Arguably, wouldn't be able to.
Plus, it says the Supreme Court is going
to strike down Trump's tariffs, which it seems
like that's going in that direction.
So he says this is a bold faced
lie to poison the well
and influence the Supreme Court's ruling.
Very well could be the whole point. Right?
Using you and getting you to think you're
gonna gain just to get something to turn.
I mean, it's what they do. This is
the part that put me over the edge.
Here's what percent just said in this conversation.
I'll just let it play for itself. It's
it's insane.
You know, it could the the 2,000
dividend could come in lots of forms and
lots of ways, George.
You know, it could be just the the
tax decreases that we are seeing on the
president's agenda. You know, no tax on tips,
no tax on overtime, no tax on Social
Security, deductibility
of auto loans. So, you know, those are
substantial deductions
that, you know, are being financed in the
tax bill.
So
who is this guy, by the way? I
mean, I know who he is, but who
is this
this muppet, Jimmy? What's the guy's name?
Jimmy. What is that guy's name? Jim Carrey
always did a good a good,
you know, from,
I don't know. I'm forgetting the name of
the movie. Anyway, that that failed. There's there's
there's a you know, the way he talks,
it just kinda makes me laugh. It's like
this,
like, kind of like a southern aristocrat kind
of like but I forget the guy's name.
Anyway, he just he's a very odd character
to me. Just on a completely subjective level.
It's that he's a funny, kind of like
interesting character that is in this position. But
the overall point to get to,
it could take the form of any other,
like, so it may very well be the
money you've already made because of what Trump
said you gained. You're welcome.
Are you serious?
The I mean, listen to the first part
again. Somebody in the chat give me the
name of that movie with, you know, every
time a bell rings, an angel gets its
wings.
In lots of forms and lots of ways,
George.
You know, it could be just the the
tax decreases that we are seeing on the
president's agenda.
Oh, okay. So you're telling me that this
$2,000 that you're saying you're gonna send to
every American might very well just be the
money you save because of what he just
did today.
That's the most insanely dishonest thing I've ever
heard. Are you kidding me?
The idea you're gonna pretend that things like
this is an effort to try to water
down the fact that you, I think, either
are doing this to manipulate the court or
that you already realize you can't do it,
and you're just trying to walk it back
in a weird day. Well, you already got
it apparently because of what he did today.
It's a wonderful life. Thank you. What's the
guy's name? Jimmy something. I'm forgetting his name.
But you get my point. It's the way
he used to he when that guy got
older, that's the way he talked. Anyway, pass
it down. This guy's just an interesting character.
But my it's just such insulting reality. Like,
if you honestly cared about this, you wouldn't
then go, oh, okay. Well, you know, you
would call it out and say, well, then
they lied about this. It doesn't take the
form of whatever they want to make it
into. That's not the same thing. You You're
gonna say, Well, we Your costs are lower
even though they're not. Therefore, you made 2,000
this month. They just didn't.
Jimmy Stewart, thank you. Thank you, Katie.
So here,
he says the 2,000 dividend could come in
lots of forms. It could be just the
tax decreases.
No tax on tips. You know? It could
be overtime. It could be that we gave
you extra tips because you didn't have to
tax them.
You get it. That's yeah. As they say,
you're not gonna get those checks. These people
are so dishonest. It's just the government, guys.
So this person says, Trump's claiming you'll get
a thousand dollar tariff refund. The average American
has paid more than that in tariffs already.
Because, as you know, if you're not a
complete clown, their tariffs are taxes on you
and your costs, and that increases $2,000. He
says, well, between three and five. This doesn't
lower prices. It adds $400,000,000,000
to the national debt to rebate two thirds
of Americans 2,000 checks if that happens. Supreme
court is currently talking about striking down the
tariffs and forcing them to refund Americans anyway.
See? That's what they're trying to manipulate right
now, making it sound like they're the ones
that created this. And it says, but Trump
is trying to frame this as his idea
for the people. Think about how dishonest that
is. Trump constantly makes people live lives worse
in their opinion. I agree. The government does
that. Then cuts them a check with his
name on it because he thinks they're too
stupid to realize that they've lost more than
that check.
No different than the last time. What do
you think they look at what they did
with the Biden administration during COVID. I mean,
they they destroyed everyone's lives then gave you
a small check. It's the same thing, guys.
And this is just a quick thread you
can look at for yourself. It says stimulus
checks are back. President Trump announced the tariff
dividend. What they say, we expect 85%
plus of US adults to receive this, resulting
in $400,000,000,000
plus handed out as and and how much
you wanna bet certain of of us don't
get that if it does go out.
All as US debt nears $40,000,000,000,000
Cut to the chase. It's a good thread.
Read in-depth information. It simply says ultimately stimulus
payments almost always end up being massive involuntary
taxes.
They know what they're doing, guys. They know
what they're doing.
And of course,
Alex Jones
comes in and says, if America falls, the
West falls, then the whole world.
Now is the time to get behind Donald
Trump and his economic recovery.
Well, as David Icke says, mister clueless, that's
Alex Jones, even after all that's happened since
January and everyone,
plenty of people that are borderline as large
as him are starting to find the gumption
to call this out.
Not him though.
He says, with all that's happened since January,
everybody must get behind Trump and back him
get behind him. He says, if this is
the alternative media, we are truly effed. Fortunately,
it's only the most ludicrous part of it.
Just so people can start to call that
out, man, because he has lost the plot.
Now to wrap this up last two parts,
mister Sausage simply adds, Trump is getting bad
advice. Trump is playing to his donors. Trump's
hands are tied. Excuse excuse for why you
might explain what he's doing to you. He
means, well, he says, folks,
Trump is complicit in the whole thing. He's
been playing for the Israel led new world
order all along. You know, what what Jones
is ignoring and trying to act like it's
not globalism techno technocracy and everything else he's
always been pretending to call out. He is
pacifying the people for the great reset. I
100% agree with that.
Now president Trump expects November 7, billionaire donor,
Miriam Adelson, Paul Singer, and John Paulson, all
a bunch of Zionist Israel, you know, influencers,
rather, oligarchs
to contribute an additional $20,000,000
to his campaign
to unseat Thomas Massie. Nothing wrong with that.
Bunch of Israeli oligarchs buying an election because
that's what we call democracy in this broken
country, don't we? So far and by the
way, that kind of is democracy. Mob rule
is basically the reality. My point is this
is not a republic. It's not what we
pretend that it's not what this country was
founded as.
So far, the trio have spent $2,000,000
to attack Massey.
Axonomic enemy of the state says they're not
spending tens of millions trying to unseat a
Democrat
or win the senate.
They're spending tens of millions of dollars to
unseat
a single Republican congressman from Kentucky
who happens to be the one trying to
get the Epstein discharge petition passed.
Suspicious AF.
This is why people are starting to see
it.
And here, John Cleese, very much a Democrat,
comes out and says, are foreign nationals able
to buy American elections? Look at that, guys.
You realize John Cleese is probably one of
the most well known names. I may be
maybe less so today, but 5,200,000
followers.
Monty Python.
The guy is coming out and saying, are
foreign nationals able to buy American elections?
Guys, the Overton window is broken.
How do we not recognize that we have
been there? We're winning. We won. It's there.
We just have to actually capitalize. And I
mean that in the sense of this conversation.
Like I said, redefine what winning looks like
in this. We are winning simply because independent
media are basically setting the conversation.
Look at
that. Look at that and recognize what that
means. Megatron, another gigantic Republican Trump supporter says
Israeli political donor, Rear Adelson, will lead a
$20,000,000
campaign to unseat Massey. I mean, I think
it was Megatron. Right? I mean, these days,
some of these things blend together. Either way,
the point is, I believe he was Trump
supporter. Who's calling now?
I just think that's insane. And I said,
you can't put this genie back in the
lamp, guys. You can't.
Even Anne Vandersteel, somebody who has been, in
many cases, many times spread misinformation about Trump
to support the team, whether she knew it
or not. We don't live in Israel, she
says. Take your money, honey, and send it
over there. I'm done bleeding for your country
or the or bleeding our country for theirs.
America first.
See? America first is not what Trump says.
MAGA is not what the team Trump says,
cat turd. It's about people who actually care
about America first before anything else. And what
we're finding out is that Trump's administration is
not that.
Well, we knew that. We called it out
before. But what a lot of people are,
for the first time, finally seeing. Thomas Massie
exposes AIPAC. New clip that just simply continues
to show you what is really the problem
here.
What he promised us was we would put
America first. And I and I think there
are still voices in this administration.
You still got JD Vance. You still got
Tulsi Gabbard.
You still
RFK Junior. You still got calmer heads that
could prevent They were not makes me very
unhappy to hear that.
Just wanna point that
out. Maybe he just hasn't, maybe he's just
trying to be hopeful, but but, you know,
it worries me that this is set up
for the next one.
JD Vance. I mean, are we really gonna
pretend that he's a cooler head? He says
exactly the same things Trump does. Gabbard has
pulled all of the punches that she put
that she was willing to go with before.
Now Venezuela is good. Now Israel is the
best. Like, complete one eighty.
So for him to say that, I mean,
RK Jr has showed himself to be completely
sold out on everything before this and Meg
Maha and Israel.
So, I mean, who maybe just saying that
to like, we everyone does for Trump and
the rest. Maybe he's just doing it to
get around. I'm saying it just to be
objective. That doesn't matter to me. It's about
the principles, what the statement, and what you're
doing right there, Massey, is either I flatly
disagree with and you're maybe you just don't
see it, which I find hard to believe,
or you're siding with people in the partisan
game. Makes me unhappy to hear that. And
I just mean simply because, I mean, you
can choose and stand with whoever you want.
And maybe Massey wants to side with them
because he think maybe they're better than they
claim. At the end of the day, they
are doing the same things Trump is. So
why would he break them like that? Why
would he say that their cooler heads may
prevail? I just don't believe that. Maybe RFK
Jr and Gabbard, you could say, if left
to their own devices, would be different.
At the end of the day, they're supporting
the whole thing. Just wanna make that clear.
Let me go back a little bit and
play it all the way through. You still
got JD Vance. You still got Tulsi Gabbard.
You still
RFK Jr. You still got calmer
heads that could prevent They were not persuasive
in this case, clearly.
Well, somebody was persuasive. AIPAC is very persuasive.
For instance, the Israeli lobby in Congress,
if you if you look at my colleagues'
feeds now, there's they all look the same.
They're all tweeting the same message that And
that goes for JD Vance and Gabbard and
Gaurav Kaye. Right? It does. You can look
for yourself. We've gotta support Israel, and we've
gotta do this. Mike That's important to think
about. Right? That their timelines, American politicians all
suddenly look the same. And he literally just
told you APAC. I mean, you can't miss
what that's being Massey is demonstrating that very
clearly, which I find hard to see as
anything other than calling out the truth, but
we'll have to see how this plays out.
If he suddenly leans in with JD Vance
next time, I will find it hard to
believe he's being honest.
Daniel McAdams
points out what the Jerusalem Post and Sprinter
Press shared, which is
the slogan this is from Jerusalem Post. The
slogan America First
also
means supporting The US's biggest ally in the
region full of enemies because collaboration with Israel
ensures The United States remains a forefront of
global innovation.
So, Sprinkle Press writes, Israel first. Right. And
so, Daniel McAdams says, so you're telling me
that America first actually means Israel first? Gotcha.
Guys, it's just very much on the surface
of the conversation right now.
Last couple points before we finish on a
couple points of an overlap to Venezuela.
NSO Group, Pegasus. We've talked about this many
times. It's now coming out more and more.
And I just think it's good, like, well,
at this point, I don't even care. I
never really have who, you know, whether someone
gets credited for breaking down this. I I'm
not the first one to talk about any
of this stuff for that matter. I've talked
about I mean, I'm showing what James Corbett
has covered. The point is, it doesn't matter.
I don't care if Tucker gets credited for
breaking the whole thing down. We are I'm
glad people are starting to see the bigger
picture.
And whether that's the it's not left. It's
not right. It's the US government. It's the
infiltration from a foreign power. In this case,
Biden before and even Trump I mean, Trump
way more in this last administration has allowed
Israel to basically take
access to anything they want, whether it's all
the AI, you know, literally everything the government
has on you to, quote, train their AI
models or surveilling you through Palantir or anything
else we're talking about. In this case,
Pegasus,
which I forgot to grab. I'll just grab
one of them real quickly.
Derek has written numerous articles on this. An
NSO group has been found guilty for spying
on foreign governments, on Americans, on any number
of things. That is an Israeli spy
prop,
as a spyware program.
So John Scott
rail Railton points out, he says NSO floats
PEGAS' spyware
in the
basically, to use it in a time of
domestic crisis for The United States.
If a US law enforcement or intelligence agency
again wishes to use Pegasus at a time
of domestic crisis,
basically go ahead. Israel's saying use this now.
He says, I believe they won't stop lobbying
until they get Pegasus to The United States.
I think Pegasus has long since been in
The United States. He says to hack Americans.
I agree. He says last month, NSO got
hit with a very consequential injunction barring them
from targeting WhatsApp users. We talked about this
as well, January 7.
Different part of the story, but same story.
Now he says NSO Group is no friend
of America or our values. For a decade,
they've enabled foreign governments to hack Americans and
US officials. That's Israel. Their entire business model
is illegally hacking US companies,
And they've spent years arguing in court that
US law doesn't apply to them. Doesn't that
sound familiar? Like Israel's Zionist government saying that
international law does not apply to them?
Not really a hard overlap right there, guys,
because it's the same.
We're talking about the Israeli government.
So, let's not forget that in April 2025,
Wired reported the spyware maker NSO Group is
paving a path back into Trump's America.
Now, I showed you this in the beginning.
Donald Trump has already overlapped himself with this
group, Israel's intern
many different elements of their internal surveillance network.
But Trump has opened this door.
Here
is even an overlap over that had to
do with Gaza and Israel, as Mohammad Shehada
recently pointed out. Israeli media claimed that Trump,
and this is my point, it goes back
to the beginning of all this, promised to
allow Netanyahu to violate the Gaza ceasefire. We
told you this report at the time. This
is from January
2025, right when he came to power. Right?
The second phase, they promised that. Okay?
Trump's gift bag so, Mary Madison got a
gave him a $100,000,000. He promised to allow
West Bank annexation. Right? Netanyahu
and him made a deal. Let me violate
the deal. And second phase, you can blame
Hamas. You'll give me West Bank annexation.
Also,
lifting all sanctions on Israel's spyware, Pegasus.
Right. Now, one of two things could have
happened, which I don't believe they lifted the
sanctions. The reality is they've let them infiltrate
this country.
We know
that. So just think about what we're talking
about. When you've got this is a known
criminal
spyware group that even wired is telling you
Trump is paving the way. There's there's just
no misunderstanding where we are. It takes a
special kind of stupid to not acknowledge how
alarming this is. And just one last point.
We'll get into more tomorrow or possibly the
next day, but I'm gonna try to do
tomorrow after five points. Sean King. It appears
Donald Trump gives Israel a pass even on
killing Christians as long as it's Israel doing
the killing.
We grab this since that comes up.
Where is it?
I think it's you're right here. Perfect. I
want you guys not to forget.
It's much longer than this now. I think
it's eight and a half months
that an American citizen, third generation, born in
Florida, has been held for over eight months
in Israeli prison. He's lost tons of weight.
He's got illnesses. They don't care. You have
not heard from any America First politicians. No
Republicans as far as I can tell. Not
one.
He's still there. Talk about an America First.
How about how about Randy Fine? Where you
at, bud? Right? Are you are you gonna
care about an American citizen or do you
only care about Israel? Israeli interests?
I was gonna say Israeli citizens, but I
said instead the word wrong. The point is
clearly,
Trump, Marco Rubio, Bondi, Cas Patell, they don't
care about these people. They don't care about
Americans if Israel's doing it. So same point.
Sean King is showing you Christians.
They're bombing churches, killing Christians in Syria, in
Gaza.
Same point.
And if you still pretend like there's no
Christians or or Catholic churches in Gaza, that
you're I can't you're the insanity of not
being so bound by the narrative,
where you can quite literally prove that's been
happening the entire time. Or the fact that
Jews were were removed from Gaza because of
Israel, not because of Hamas. It just never
stops. But if anybody else slaughtered 21 Christians,
it would be wall to wall news
all across the I mean, every platform across
the world. But they killed 21 Christians.
Israel does it, and nobody cares. Now where
are all the America first Christian right? Right?
John Rich and all these people screaming out
Christian. Where are they?
Not saying a word.
Now,
I'm gonna play this clip.
We're gonna end with a quick overlap of
where we're going in regard to foreign policy
over Venezuela and kind of international waters, but
just very clearly see how this all comes
back together. Chris Hedges has this little clip.
This is from his report. I think it's
important to listen to this. And this is
this goes back well before just Venezuela. It's
just the way that the US government operates,
and it's no different between Trump and Biden.
Afghanistan, under US occupation, produced
more heroin than the entire world could absorb.
And the truth around this phenomenon, I think,
is one of the best kept secrets of
the twenty first century. And the lack of
awareness in the general population among Americans
is really astonishing, but it's not a surprise.
Their ignorance has been procured by the mass
media and the government just hiding this sort
of crime of the century.
Really quickly. I just want you to think
about this. I, you know, I almost started
with this for this kind of overarching point,
but it's just we have to understand
what he's talking about is something that is
so easily proven. I mean, even into the
we did an article on this.
It's called Operation Enduring Freedom, The United States
Opium Trade,
2016.
Right? I wrote this article back before I
was doing the show. This is funny how
you can call this stuff out, and we
knew it. You could prove it at the
time. Right? And what he's getting into is
the fact that whether it's Afghanistan or plenty
of other overlaps, that the US government literally
flooded the market with heroin. That became the
opioid crisis
and, I mean, any number of other things
in the world. And so what we're talking
about is how many major stories are like
that? Where you can it's it's been this
long story, and it's not just left right
paradigm. It's the entire media apparatus that controls,
construct, and contracts, and, like, you know,
let some information out, but ultimately controls the
largest point. And they do this with every
story, whether they even realize it or not.
So where we are today, I want you
to consider whether that's everything else in the
same way, whether it's Trump lying about grocery
prices or the ongoing war or the genocide.
We know the reality.
It's always been there. They're just lying to
you. They're deceiving you about the bigger truth.
Now I'm gonna play this back. I want
you to think about the bigger point about
not just the heroin and the opioid crisis,
but the fact that the US government can
conduct such an obvious agenda
in plain daylight and then just lie to
the world about it, and the power structures
all know, but the average people are gaslit
by the media, gaslit by their neighbors, it
just never stops.
2,000,
more heroin than the entire world. US occupation
produced
more heroin than the entire world could absorb.
And the truth around this phenomenon, I think,
is one of the best kept secrets of
the twenty first century. And the lack of
awareness in the general population among Americans is
really astonishing, but it's not a surprise. Their
ignorance has been procured by the mass media
and the government just hiding this sort of
crime of the century. The February and the
twenty tens were a time of global heroin
crisis around the world. In The United States,
it's recent memory. People are well aware that
we had a terrible heroin crisis in this
country. It became nearly the leading cause of
death among adults. And then, of course, morphed
and transformed into the fentanyl epidemic, which is
with us today and has never been worse
than it is right now. Well, the cause
of that heroin crisis was down to the
war in Afghanistan. The war in Afghanistan caused
the heroin crisis globally. In Europe, in Russia,
in Australia, in Asia, and also in Canada,
and in The United States, all these, countries
that that have that are either first world
or have a large market for drug users
were inundated
with high highly potent and very, very cheap
heroin from Afghanistan during this time. And it's
just supply and demand when there's that much
of it, it becomes a lot cheaper. In
The United States, people whose opioid addiction have
been primed by loose prescribing practices around prescription
pills found that they could buy heroin for
a lot cheaper than they could get, let's
say, some Percocet pills that have been diverted
from the illicit drug market. And Now think
about this in a larger scale well as
well. You know, you go back in history
to Britain and the op and the opium
wars with China.
Not too far fetched to think about that
maybe
they saw this as an opportunity to do
that to the whole world to their benefit
as the US government or as the, you
know, Western apparatus, whatever you wanna talk about,
the globalist, whatever, you know, whatever. But something
deciding that by allowing this or doing this,
that they could create that same kind of
vulnerability and benefit from it. Or any number
of other ways you could think of it.
The point is that they did this, they
manufactured it, benefited from it, and hid it
from everybody, and then benefit from the opioid
crisis and benefit from the foreign policy of
blaming China for fentanyl and whatever else they're
doing.
And the dirty secret, you could buy heroin
for a lot cheaper than they could get,
let's say, some Percocet pills that have been
diverted from an illicit drug market. And the
dirty secret that no one in in government
or media bothered to tell us all these
years was that the people in Afghanistan that
were producing that those drugs, they were people
on The US payroll. They were narco warlords
that were directly armed, sponsored, and protected by
the CIA and the special forces. And Which
by the way, part continued through Trump's last
administration. It continues now in many ways as
they pretend to fight drugs when really what
they're getting into, which point we'll point this
out to end,
is, you know, not even remotely what they're
claiming. In many cases, random innocent finish fishermen,
but in some cases, drugs, but not in
the context they're claiming and really just about
creating a context.
That complicity went all the way up to
the top of the corrupt Afghan client state.
Hamed Karzai and his family, they were definitely
implicated in it. And many other named warlords,
I have their names in the book, demonstrate
for a fact that this government, this client
government in Afghanistan was effectively, you know, the
biggest drug cartel in in world history. And
the fact that The United States the whole
of the United States government was complicit in
this is really mind boggling to contemplate.
Yep.
Now really think about that in the larger
context of what Trump says he's doing right
now.
It it's insulting, and it should be.
As always, the ones literally doing the thing,
claiming like they're the ones saving you from
it is like the worst of the worst.
Now, check out this this article discussing this.
It's the same idea. It's about the rat
the use of this. And, you know, what
he's discussing is the long term after this
article.
Now, here's what Jesse Waters had to say.
I know this isn't it's not necessarily connected
to the exact same point, but it's just
a the insult it's I don't even know
what to call this is the right word
for this. The demeaning Jesse
Waters, the way he's framing this, acting like
it's intelligence to discuss this foreign policy in
this way. And I guess we're back to
Greenland, apparently. I almost feel like it's a
distractionary tactic because it's just going right back
to going, we're taking Greenland. You know, the
thing that was a troll and they were
all making fun of you for falling for
it. Now they're going, Greenland, we're gonna take
it because we can. Like, in what world
is this not insulting to everybody? You're just
gonna seize the territory because that's the peace
president?
But he's acting like this is what big
boys do. Like, they're they're they're laughing at
you. I think you I if you I
hope people can understand the way they're doing
this. Jesse Waters using these mindless repeaters to
convince you that somehow adults in the room
would do the thing that they they would
murder other people for doing.
It's mindless.
Being friendly to the world is what got
us in this mess. We're not in high
school. We don't need friends. Yeah. Who cares
about relations with other nuclear powers? You know?
Pshaw. We just get out there and do
what we want because we're tough guys. We
have big you know, it's stupid.
Like, that sentiment, it pains me how dumb
that is.
The idea that we don't need we're not
high school. Where were you talking to? What
kind of dumbed down audience are you projecting
right there? The idea that we don't need
relations with foreign country. Now I'm of the
mind that
absolutely America first, we don't need to worry
about foreign wars, but the idea of not
having relations with foreign powers and like, in
a in a conversational sense or, like, relaying
back and forth, not necessarily involved with foreign
policy agendas.
But the idea that we don't, it just
seems insane to
me. Because what he's really trying to say
is not that we don't wanna work with
them because we're focusing on America, but we
don't work with them because we're gonna take
what we want.
We don't wanna be friends with them. We're
gonna muscle our way into everything we want.
Okay. That's not what you're promising the world.
That's not America first. That's not about America's
interest first. It's not about
no foreign wars or American police. It's the
exact opposite. It's exact everything Biden was doing,
plus some. Just like Biden was everything Trump
was doing plus some. Just like that last
Trump was everything you know, it goes on
that way every time.
The world is what got us in this
mess. We're not in high school. We don't
need friends.
Every country puts their interest first. That's true.
And when our interests align, we can do
business. And when they don't, that's life.
Yeah. That's not that's completely fair, but that's
not what's actually happening. And even the way
you just started that is not and I'm
not saying we have to be hanging out
and high fiving his friends. The point is
that's he's talking about working with foreign countries
and then framing that as not what adults
do. Then goes on to say, but that's
what we do when we have deals. And
it it just doesn't make any sense. What
they're trying to do is say what Democrats
did were weird, childish friendly things. It just
it's just playing at the at your division
tactics.
Hoping that by saying Democrats are bad at
this, whatever Trump's doing now is the right
thing. That's the basic binary way that they
convince people to do whatever they're currently doing.
Same thing happens on the other side.
If we have to burn down a few
bridges with Denmark to take Greenland, we're big
boys. We'd Oh, yeah. Because, you know, crime,
you know, international law, who cares? We'll just
take it because, you know, we're strong because
that is what might makes right is. Peace
through strength is what it means might makes
right. It means we could take what we
want because we think we owe we're owed
that. We deserve it because it's in our
interest. Who cares if we're literally stealing land
from a foreign country?
That's colonialism, guys. We're right back in the
beginning of this, and he's acting like big
boys put on the big boy pants and
steal territory.
Dropped a bombs on Japan, and now they're
our top ally in the Pacific.
Yeah. So let we that by that logic,
we should just bomb everybody and say be
our friend.
I just don't know why people don't ridicule
people like this.
The bot but the a understand as well
that they were retreating. They bothered it because
they wanted to anyway. They're they're the evil
aspect in that conversation.
You literally dropped bombs on entire society to
see what happened and to threaten Russia. And
the reality being that they were already retreating
and you didn't need to do that. But,
yeah, we did that, and then we basically
muscled them into being under our thumb. Isn't
that what freedom looks like?
Jesse, you're either really, really out of the
know in this conversation or you are just
parroting what you're told. Probably both. He looks
like a Don Lemon to me, quite frankly.
He's just in the position, and they say
what they're told. Just like everybody in these
positions, they are not out there uniquely telling
you their opinions.
We may have to burn a bridge to
build a big, beautiful new one to the
next generation.
America's not handcuffed by history.
Trump knows what we need.
I mean, it just I I just it
it gives me a headache. To think that
there are people that act like this guy
is some kind of insider you know, like,
he's giving you some hip inside take.
He's talking about imperialist control. He's talking about
stealing from foreign countries, and he's talking about,
you know, well or or I guess the
first point is sort of like we don't
need friends because we're gonna
be powerful and take what we want.
I just this this should be laughed at.
It really should. But there's far too many
idiots out there that just parrot what the
team says, who secretly don't even know care.
It's at the end of the day, don't
even care, I think, about what's happening.
They have an interest in simply going, what
he said, I agree with because that's what
benefits me. Far too much of that is
happening.
Afshan Rassani points out that we're this this
is Hegseth saying, we're not building for peace
time. He says, quote, we are pivoting the
Pentagon and our industrial base
to a wartime footing. Now, that's not the
same as saying, during peace, prepare for war,
the thing he says before. He's saying we're
shifting to a wartime footing.
You can't this is not peace time, guys.
It's not a peace president. They are beginning
to shift into war like we always told
you they would, like they never stopped doing.
But my point is he's saying it now.
They've never stopped. This government has never stopped
being at war since World War two or
really since you know, you could argue different
nuances.
But even more specifically, never declared war since
World War two and has been a state
like a perpetual
state of forever war
as far back as you can look.
So this is not new. He's just now
calling it that. And now you're gonna continue
to call him a peace president because they
claim he ended things that didn't even stop.
Now here's a little bit of nuance understanding.
Oh, wait. Let me make sure I didn't
miss that.
Oh, there it is.
Of this of the situation that I think
you need to you should hear. And this
is also from his going underground show,
just about where this goes back to. And
it's not unique to one side or the
other. And this is about much more than
or it's not even close to about protecting
anybody or stopping drugs. It's what it's always
been. It's imperialism.
If you add the quantitative easing over the
past week, which they can be leveraged into
that system, does that not necessitate
wars? I mean, The United States has an
economic necessity
for wars, and that's why Trump he didn't
care that the MAGA base didn't like his,
30 41,000,000,000 to Raytheon, 33,000,000,000 to Northrop, 34,000,000,000
to General Dynamics, 33,000,000,000 to Boeing. That was
the big beautiful bill as,
you know, social programs for drug addicts in
the inner cities of America were cut.
Well, some of them continue, by the way,
in Africa that Trump's administration continued that nobody
likes to talk about.
Look it up.
But what they really want, I mean, and
what you're hinting at is, yes, they need
collateral
to, underpin,
all of these liabilities
on their bank on their bank,
not on their bank accounts, their bank sheets.
And
so they've got to get,
they need resources. They need the oil of
Venezuela. They need the Arctic. They need the
Middle East.
Rare earth minerals. Resources.
Hardly,
just to reinforce.
Because when you get to the end of
your leverage,
you can't
give more credit until you get more assets
on your balance sheet. And so they want
the assets of Venezuela and The Middle East
on their balance sheet so they can lend
more
and therefore take more resources
by and lend to countries that have resources
and then use those, if you like, prefer
the expansion.
Everything is about expansion.
America thrives on expansion.
And so all of these things connected by,
you know, that America is getting, first of
all, overwhelmed by its deficits Mhmm. And is
getting anxious and very antsy
about the fact that,
there are seem to be sort of problems
in in in the credit markets,
in the shadow banking area. Yeah. In things,
we've seen it by subprime auto loans now
and other things. Like, that's that's the reference,
I believe, the 2008, but that problem still
exists is the point. It got worse later.
They just have pinned it up differently. Let's
not forget that the most obvious shadow bank
in the conversation, that's BlackRock.
A number of companies
gone bankrupt.
So they don't know what's there. And so
I think that's why they're trying to,
to pull in money as fast as they
can. Yeah. By stealing it from whoever they
can. Right? But according to just Jesse Waters,
we don't need friends. Just take what you
want. Hashtag freedom. Well, let's talk about the
overlap of this while they're bombing ships in
the middle of the ocean claiming to fight
narcoterrorism.
Right? Well, we just talked about Afghanistan and
the reality of build building the largest drug
cartel in the world that they all still
continue to work through. And then don't forget,
guys. They I've said this a thousand times.
Masseria, I think we can clearly see by
now. But in Afghanistan, the same point applies.
They're still involved there. I've said this from
the very beginning. And Trump even let that
out of the bag when he talked about
trying to take the base back. That's not
just some off the cuff doc. He they're
still involved down on the ground. It's constant.
And they lied to you every single time
they deal with this. So the point is,
as Trump says he's sending US special operators
to fight Mexican drug cartels, it's embarrassing to
argue that they care about any of this
while they've provably worked with these drug cartels
in Mexico, as I just showed you even,
I'll grab this one yet again, of the
DEA.
We just talked about this. This is an
this is a new report from August
2025.
The wiretap. The DEA laundered $19,000,000
of drug cartel money into cash and crypto.
Guess how
nothing has happened. No one's gone to jail.
As far as I could tell, nothing actually
happened. They they and this is the DEA.
Right? Isn't this the FBI that should be
investigating this? Where you at, Cash? Is anybody
gonna go to jail? Pretty sure that's not
gonna happen.
So we're gonna fight the drug cartels while
we're protecting
the drug cartels, while we're becoming a drug
cartel or have been in Afghanistan.
It's insulting to your intelligence if you understand
what they've always been doing.
And in regard to the people they're bombing,
so say depressed. Trump has accused boat crews
of being narcoterrorists. The truth, AP found, is
more nuanced.
Now it's worth reading the whole article. But
to end quickly,
it says one was a fisherman struggling to
eke out a living in this one boat
on a $100 a month. Another was a
career criminal. A third was a former military
cadet, And a fourth was a down on
his luck bus driver. Now the argument goes
that some of these boats do have cocaine
on them. But what's interesting is this is
what I kept telling you before, is that
some of these places are going from places
that are not restricting this. Just because The
US argues that's a problem and lies saying
it's going to The United States wasn't fentanyl,
that that means they can just Internet I
mean, look. If this country believes that it's
not illegal to have cocaine and they're shipping
it to a country that doesn't believe it's
illegal to have cocaine, what are we talking
about? We're talking about the US government stepping
in and using this to execute its worldwide
agenda
and killing people in the process, but not
even which are all criminals. So you have
people that are paying, like this guy, a
$100 a month, being paid to work on
this boat. Now all of that's to say,
let's just even say you think it's okay
to execute all these people because of cocaine
on the boat that's not even illegally going
to The United States.
And it's also in international waters, which The
US has no authority to do that. But
what about the fishermen?
Right? He's not breaking the law in the
context of where he's from. He's working on
this boat. He's not a narcoterrorist.
None of them are. They're simply shipping cocaine
that you argue was a crime because you
control people put in their bodies.
It's it's an it's an argument from print
about whether you think these things are inherently
bad or not. But all that aside,
they're not all criminals, or rather they're not
all narcoterrorists.
At the very least, they're not all any
of them are not justifiable to execute without
any kind of process.
But quick quite a far cry from all
MS 13, Tran de Arugua terrorist, monster, rapist,
right?
But no one cares who already anyone who
was pairing that without evidence, they don't care
when there's evidence anyway. Because they were gonna
pair it what they were told anyway. Anybody
who cared about evidence has always been going,
Well, we don't know for sure because they
haven't given us anything. Why do you think
that? Because now the evidence shows they were
lying to you. Either they lied or they
didn't care in the first place. It's disgusting.
Now,
end with this clip.
Just a quick thing about Africa, I think,
but it's the general point. It's a Freudian
slip about what they're really doing. And I
do believe this is actually what this is.
Because at the end of the day, I
think they know what they're doing to these
countries and they try to frame it as
building public private partnerships to to help everybody
grow as they steal and always have and
are doing that as we speak.
Exploit.
I'll leave it with this clip. Thank you
for tuning in today. That's been an old
time.
I hate that. That was the podcast. It
was the rim of that cup was barely
in the shot the whole time.
But thank you for tuning in, guys. You
know, I mean, it's it's an interesting time
because it's it's
I argue there's a lot of things to
be happy, but not happy, but, you know,
positive momentum. We're watching things change. We're watching
narratives break down. Awareness around things like Zionism
and Israel that I've never ever would have
thought would come to pass.
I don't know how you see that as
anything but positive. Of course, they're gonna make
your life as uncomfortable as possible so that
you stop pointing to it.
Now is the time to find your courage.
Right? Now is the time to find that
constitution, stand up, and fight for what you
believe in.
I mean, you know, we always talk about
the history of people who stood up and
fought for what they want, what they believed,
what they, you know, fought for their principles,
fought for a better world.
You know, well, if you listen to Mark
Levin, not on my watch, bub. You're not
gonna change the world with your podcast, he
said. Right?
That's desperation.
That's fear. Fear of you, of your ability
to reach people with the truth.
So show him how powerful that is. Show
everybody.
Take the time.
Find your path. Right? Find the courage to
see that path and to follow it through.
I mean, I think right now, we are
watching something very profound. And I think if
we don't continue to see this through, we
are gonna see it wind back like it
always does. All the left right paradigm will
drive it back into place.
It's up to us to decide to fight
for something different. Never do I mean violence,
but I mean fight for it. So thank
you for tuning in. If you believe in
our work, support what we're doing, putting this
content out for free, let us know what
it's worth to you. We're gonna keep doing
it regardless, but we can't continue to grow
without your support. So thank you for tuning
in. I love you all. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
How can we help foster
the public private partnerships, bringing American capital and
expertise
and standards,
to Africa so that we can keep, exploiting,
so that we can,
exploring,
where we can get these minerals. Anyway, welcome
to the state department. I think we have
some interns in the back. Welcome.
Good to
see you in this
exercise and transparency and democracy.
Is that what it is?
Sorry. I thought it was I didn't mean
to break it down. An exercise
in an exercise in
spin and obfuscation.
Alright. Can you tell this is my last
briefing before vacation?