There is no doubt that the so called
rebel forces
attacking the government in Syria
are creatures of The United States and of
Israel.
There's been congressional
testimony
in The United States openly
that The United States had spent
more than half a billion dollars
on the
civilian rebel forces.
That was some years ago, it had gone
up since then.
Israel has provided medical and other support facilities
to them perfectly openly.
The United States
yesterday
was attacking
from the air
forces coming from Iraq to try to help
the government of Syria,
while Israel
was attacking the links between Syria and Lebanon,
again with bombing
from the air.
And for forces facing the rebels, the Syrian
Arab army, the National Army of Syria
has been bombed relentlessly
by Israel
for more than a year.
So there's no doubt whatsoever that the rebels
are backed by
the CIA
and backed by
Israel.
And that's what's happening here. It's an attempt
by the Americans
and the Israelis
aided by the Turks
to overthrow
the regime in Damascus
in order to block
assistance
flowing through Syria
to Lebanon?
We created ISIS.
I mean, ISIS is no less than
the people up in Islamberg, no less than
Gulen, is a CIA creation.
John McCain, for heaven's sake, was over there
with the with the ISIS officials.
We created them. They came from the Al
Narsai group, the Syrian Liberation Front.
These two organizations combined and they they they
morphed into ISIS. It's our creation. We create
them. We still direct them. When
ISIS warriors
are injured in in battle, where are they
transported?
They're transported, for heaven's sake, to Israel.
They're treated by the Israelis and Israeli hospitals
and brought back to battle. Oh, plenty plenty
of the rebels have admitted acknowledged that they've
been supported by Israel, and they've they've thanked
Israel for helping them throughout. In fact, arms
are oftentimes caught Israeli arms are caught on,
you know, en route to the rebel groups.
Others.
You tell the story about how you tried
to find out what the
what they call the Mossad when they deal
with, publicly? I thought was a reasonable question,
but the trouble is, you can't pick up
the phone book. There's no, Langley in, in
Israel that you can look up, you know,
CIA, or in our case, the Mossad. We
thought we should ask, what shall we call
it in English? You You can translate the
Hebrew words, as I said, Mosadda's Institute. But
when they write a letter to their friends
in the CIA or the British intelligence, what
do they call themselves? It took a while.
It was a matter of asking the prime
minister's spokesman, the best you could do because
officially,
the Mosadda's under the prime minister's office.
And, I think he sort of wondered why
he wanna know and all that, so we
explained.
And he came up with, the Israeli
Secret Intelligence
Service. And if it were to have initials,
it would be ISIS.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thursday, 11/06/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Definitely thought
it was an important point to reiterate.
The obvious
long outlined
reality that The US and Israel have been
arming funding in a large way created what
is
al Qaeda, ISIS, and the
many different variations of terrorist organizations that they
have used over the years to achieve their
goals. And it doesn't mean every single element
of every single part of these things are
always completely under control or if ever that
was the case. The point is, though, you
can't really deny that connection.
And I'll go through this today as we
get into the point, but I think that
opening clip is important for many reasons of
the many different clips, and we can go
on forever from there. Many different examples.
But, of course, with the ISIS linked thing,
attack that we're gonna discuss again today that
the FBI is investigating, five people apparently have
been arrested.
And we'll go over why I think this
still appears to be something that's being obviously
manipulated. And there's at this point in time,
still, as of right now, no indictments. There's
been
criminal complaints
that everyone seems to be framing as indictments,
but it's not the same thing. And I'll
go over why I think that's important.
But just understanding what this is and how
it's being used in regard to the Muslim
issue that they're pointing to. Because remember, this
is Dearborn, Michigan. We're talking about Muslims that
they picked up. And every other part of
the story around the FBI
investigation that I believe was a false flag
effort based on all the evidence, But, again,
it's being flushed out right now. When I
think we can prove something, you'll hear that
from me.
But
with all that's happening,
you know, I mean, the idea that if
you if you frame you know, again, considering
the the kind of fervor around this conversation,
if you look at all the facts on
the story,
outside of them claiming what they say they
know that you haven't seen, every single point
of the story could be I mean, you
could make exact every single point you they
allege that says they're terrorists, you could appoint
at me and say the same thing. Whether
I own certain things or I say certain
things online or I go to certain ranges,
those things are meaningless or rather your rights
in this country. But if you put it
all together and say they have, you know,
tactical vests and and different magazines, And then
because ISIS linked, it all seems like it's
big bad stuff except every one of those
things are legal.
You're allowed to do those in this country.
You're allowed to own a rifle. You're allowed
to go to shooting range.
It's interesting to think about how if it
is if it does end up to be
the case that's that a power structure like
this could literally
manufacture events like this for so long, how
many times if you wanna watch the last
show we did, I recommend we go through
the reality of that, all the different time,
many times, they've faked events to stop them,
and that's not a secret.
But
how they could do this? Frame an entire
you know, take somebody who, in in this
point, hypothetically, would be an innocent person and
just use them to be able to achieve
that goal. It just is such a it
speaks to
the nefarious nature of what I think government
is at the end of the day. At
that point, we're gonna get to the latter
segment today. I'm gonna talk about, to start,
a couple of interesting points. One thing about
censorship that I think is very important, overlapping
with Israel and what's happening right now and
that overlapping with the mom Mondani point.
You might not expect where I'm gonna take
this today, but I think it's I mean,
I those that watch this show, I'm sure
you already know, seeing as how I incessantly
point out that we don't support any government
and don't support any politician and, you know,
it's just but you get the people that
perceive it being left and right because you
call out the current thing. You know, it's
interesting.
But it's it's not hard to recognize where
this seems to go. I mean, realistically, just
to open the point on this before we
come back to it is, you know, this
is a person who wants to build the
government, who wants to increase the size of
the government and government involvement in your life.
Why would anybody think I support that or
anybody in a position calling out or, like,
coming from a limited government perspective? And that
even seem to be most conservatives right now.
He calls himself a Republican. But I'm of
the mind that all of these people are
government, are in the interest of trying to
control your life.
And I make that case today, but I
wanna go over what this exposed to us
around the left right paradigm,
the weird kind of meltdown from the right,
and then the different part of that from
Trump simultaneously
sort of saying it was stolen, but yet
this is what happens because Democrats hate us.
You know, it's it's just a weird kind
of clumsy experience that I'll take you through
on this. But why I think it's very
important, of course, you can't deny that this
overlaps with Israel and a larger agenda and
some foreign policy points to reiterate Venezuela, but
then end with the FBI point. Now to
start, in general, I wanted to make sure
you guys heard
today actually, I don't wanna take it back.
It's gonna be tomorrow. I'm gonna be putting
out a panel that we're having today. In
a couple hours or few hours, we're gonna
be doing a panel on digital IDs, a
follow-up, because we've done a couple of them
so far on the with the IMA.
And it's gonna be a pretty big one.
Like, corporate's gonna be there. I think it's
about six or seven of us, I think,
so far, but it's up in the air.
So it'll be a really important conversation about
where it currently is and how
what we were doing
discussing about it before, the importance of that
one,
agenda, but, you know, that that when that
comes to pass. That the moment that digital
ID, in essence, comes becomes
everywhere and insurmountable, like, right now, it's coming
up. It's happening everywhere, but it's not officially
everything. You cannot do it right now. When
it becomes that, and hopefully not, it is
the one of the most important points, if
not the most important important point for where
this all comes together.
And so we've talked about that a lot,
but we're gonna talk about it in the
in the kind of the through the lens
of where it is right now and how
close it is to becoming that and some
more kind of overarching kind of individual investigations
from, different parts of the IMA that I
think are gonna be presented, but, you know,
it hasn't happened yet. So we'll be playing
that tomorrow most likely, so keep an eye
out for that. But the digital ID part
of this, it's interesting to see that both
left and right and just those aware of
the whole lie,
everyone seems to be aware of how concerning
that is. Isn't that an interesting thing to
think about?
Left, right, anywhere you look right now, you
ask anybody, everyone seems to be on guard
about that. And there's parts of the right
and parts of the left that don't care
for varying reasons, but but it's pretty easy
to see the majority of people are a
little bit uncomfortable about it. And that that's
the thing I keep showing everybody. That is
the actual majority of people that are actually
uncomfortable with quite I mean, I think it's
most everything that's happening right now, but you
could decide for yourself. Just take note of
those moments when you can see through the
crack. Right? When you notice that the left
right paradigm just does not represent the majority
of people anymore if it ever did.
But let's start today. And my point in
shouting that out is to make sure you
guys check it out for tomorrow. I don't
know if we'll get a show done tomorrow.
Going to be I mean, I basically, so
you guys know, try to get a show
done every day,
organizing the tabs and so on and things
that happen overall. But, ultimately, that'll be the
plan. But tomorrow, that'll be most likely coming
out. I hope you guys can check it.
And
I guess I'll include one last thing on
that, that there has been an update from
Odysee. I just I don't wanna continue to
put out the updates because it's been so
long and I you know, we waiting
outside of something in your hands, I think
people are just not even you know, they're
waiting to see something, and I agree with
that. And so, Odysee, last point, told us
that the kind of portal system they're building
for the IMA is closed. They've had a
few different issues. They've had to update. They
just gave us some images. I'll show you,
actually, next time we decide what you know,
once I feel like it's actually really close.
But it does look really cool, and And
it's going to be something where you guys
can engage with individual parts of the IMA,
but also the IMA
portal as, like, the IMA, you know, everyone
together kind of production. But it's gonna be
really neat because it's sort of a decentralized
Internet overlap, and it'll be somewhere where you
guys can support the individuals.
Because as I've said, as always, there's no
monetary financial part of the IMA. We're all
individuals. We're just collected because we believe in
what we're doing. You know? But on that
note, more coming for IMA in general. So
let's start with some censorship that I really
wanted you to see. This one's really, really
weird to me. Now I've we've all been
noticing the weirdness of Twitter. Some people don't
care. They support it because it get you
know, their things get more prominent. But overall,
I think it's all the algorithm, even the
even the Grok and Elon and right side,
it's like, change that. It's too woke today.
It's very weird how much everything's being kinda
pushed back and forth on Twitter. This one,
I'm not even sure how to explain this,
whether this is a glitch, but it feels
very easy. It makes sense not being so.
You can see well, you'll see what I
mean when you watch it, how clearly this
could make sense where having somebody else's tweet
being very contentious, sort of like accidentally come
through another person's account.
You could see how that mistake would move
mountains in some cases. But this is Sam
Parker pointing this out. Here's the clip, and
I'll show you what,
Laura Loomer had to say about it since
she's the point in this clip.
Check this shit out. So
there's some kinda glitch going on where it's
gonna have this pro Israel bullshit
on people's post.
And then when you click the post and
you're like, oh, this guy doesn't normally support
Israel.
Except for the podcast, it's it's Evan Kilgore,
the,
I'm not exactly sure what tell me in
the chat what his exact position. I know
he's he's associated with Turning Point USA in
some way or he was. The point is
that he's supposed to be on that side
of the conversation,
and his tweet is you know, it says,
what people need to understand is that Tucker
Carlson and his people like him are running
an anti Trump op.
Then you click on the post and you
see what he really says.
So you click on the post and it
goes to nowhere in the Bible does it
tell Christians to support the modern secular nation
of Israel.
That's interesting. And if you read the rest
of the other post, it seems to be
the opposite sentiment to to a degree.
But it's showing up
as as as this bullshit
on a lot of people's posts, and they're
not saying this. It got to be some
kind of hack.
X is definitely being compromised.
Okay.
So the first part, I think, was from
the person I'll show you that you've included
the link, which I appreciate, to who actually
made that video. I don't know if this
was also part of it or this was
something,
Parker added. I'm not sure. But this is
what makes it clear is that this is
the Bloomberg tweet, which is actually where it
shows that, where what people need to understand.
Now you could argue maybe they just copied
it and posted it. Right? But I went
and looked for myself, and I wasn't able
to find
his version of that. Well, there it is.
It's Laura Loomer's tweet.
That's what got substituted
for
Evan Kilgore's tweet.
Now I do find that very weird.
Again, that I mean, of all things, you
could argue that kinda does make sense in
a in the world of glitches. Right? Like,
who knows if that's even possible functionally functionally
in the background.
But even if it is a glitch, it's
something that could be used later as an
accident. You know, it's just an interesting thing
to think about. So even now, you could
be looking at someone's content, and that could
be somebody else's information that's accidentally coming through
this person's platform.
And then and then it's like a deep
fake version for, you know, everything means nothing,
nothing needs everything kind of a world. Right?
That's the same as question everything. Right? Because
question everything is you should always be going,
could that be wrong? Could that be false?
Yes. It always could. Do I have evidence
of that? No. Okay. Continue. Right? This is
about creating a world where there is no
there's like, in a deep fake scenario, you
could be trying to verify it and and
ultimately not even realize that it's a deep
fake, and it's that's it's a different level
of it. We should always be questioning things
while considering all possibilities.
This is about driving you to a place
where you don't even try anymore because it's
so impossible. That's I think that's kind of
the the engineered helplessness they're trying to always
push. Here's what Laura said, which is funny.
This is so fake. Dark mode, light mode.
You followers also your your followers must all
be dumb AF. That is her.
And he he says, well, that's your tweet.
I mean, here and he links to the
tweet. So I don't know. Maybe she meant
something else by that, but that's her tweet
right there. Either way, that was just humorous,
but the overarching point is the weirdness of
that. Right? That happening.
Very odd. And I you know my opinion.
These kind of things are, you know, the
best kind of manipulations are not things that
appear to be an over manipulation.
Right? They don't want you to know what's
happening. Right? On top of that, on the
censorship points, Robert and Lokesh,
YouTube,
not new that YouTube's deleting stuff, but it's
actually interesting that they suddenly started pushing really
hard right aligned with this interesting shift in
all of the people controlling media around the
world and all being pro Israel con you
know, like a Larry Ellison and Barry Weiss
kind of an overlap.
But on YouTube and other platforms, this all
kind of happened at the same time. Now
they'd always been censoring around certain conversations, but
this was an instant sort of, like, mass
deleting of
not propaganda.
I mean, you could always call something you
want propaganda, but we're talking about people like
Robert and Lukasz who do very measured and
and sourced work, or people in Palestine or
people who are doing journalist work or just
people that are going, look at what Israel's
doing today, and and just completely deleting entire
channels. They deleted all of his coverage, but
specifically of Israel soldiers shooting civilians. Think about
that.
He's got tons of content, but they specifically
went through and including children targeted on a
livestream along with his entire account. No community
guideline violated and three separate excuses given, then
Google deleted his email and won't even repeal
respond to appeals. Zachary Foster says, how it
started, don't be evil. How it's going? The
Intercept, YouTube quietly erased more than 700 videos
documenting Israeli human rights violations.
Literally going after specifically the videos that prove
that they are hurting people because they're choosing
to. I mean, this is the wild nature
of where we are. We're not gonna get
so much into the Israel part today. That
will be the next thing I get into
extensively.
But, you know, the evidence we have of
what they're doing, the evidence of genocide, of
starvation, the all the genocide experts saying so,
all the starvation experts, you know, very, very
clear, and yet, everyone, you're a lying racist.
And then on top of that, they go
and do their best to censor the content
you can prove proves the thing they say
isn't happening, and we still go, no. You're
a racist or they. Whatever the whatever the
percentage, point o 1% of maniac lying people
out there that are pretending this is the
most obvious thing in the world. I mean,
that's what I would feel, but who knows
what percentage that might be? But the crazy
reality is you either can choose to look
and see what's happening, or you can pretend
it's not there. That's where I think the
world is right now.
And I think that's obvious to see that's
not the majority.
Where where,
warfare, excuse me, analysis says it's not only
YouTube removing documented crimes, it is a lot
other than just even these two platforms. It
happened kind of in a mass sweep excuse
me, sweep, which we know happens. Right? We
remember the first purge, and it always kinda
happens as a coordinated effort.
But he said ex Twitter is doing it
too. This this is actually really wild. You'll
see some of this happening right now.
I'll just jump to this first. This is
what he's seeing in other parts of the
world where it says, due to local laws,
we're temporarily restricting it. Yeah. That's that's Elon
Musk bowing to censorship. Now you could argue
that that's just how business works. Maybe you're
right. My point is then fine. At least
acknowledge that's not absolute free speech. That's not
what it looks like. Absolute does not mean
except when this happens. Right? That's just stupid.
But
this tweet or this thread, which you'll see
across the there's a lot of this happening
on the platform right now. You'll find things
like this.
Look. All these empty see all these tweets
that aren't there? Now check this out. It's
not before you'd think before, like I talked
about, like, it being kind of suppressed or
it maybe just did deleted it. Right? But
you click the
link.
Oh, that's so that was doing something different
from earlier. That's interesting. Hold on. Let me
do this.
Okay. Yeah. So see, what it's weird. You
click it now, and it makes it shows
you oh, and there there. It did it
right there. See? It the c o two
just did two different things? How interesting is
that? So instead of going to a place
where it says
deleted, like you just saw for a second
there, weirdly enough, it takes you back to
the page where it's not there.
Don't you find that? Oh, see there. Now
it went there. But it says this doesn't
exist.
God, that was so weird. I don't know
why it's doing that. Sometimes and sometimes not.
The point was,
as you just saw, lit for a second
there, rewind the page. You saw it. You
click it, and it takes you to that.
Anyway, the point is it's gone. That's the
that's the first point. The content of all
the all these videos are videos of things
that you can prove or because that's the
thread. Sorry. I should've read it at the
beginning. Proof of the 40 beheaded babies. Since
the western media failed to provide evidence of
the four 40 beheaded babies, all the evidence
you need in this thread
are babies from the Israeli bombing. Right? So
the point is
they're trying to make the get your attention
so people jump in going, oh, I've gotta
prove that Israel's right. And it's a long
thread proving rather just showing all the children
that Israel's bombings have beheaded, but the videos
are all gone. Now like you just saw,
I guess sometimes it goes to the gone,
but in my experience, most times I've clicked
these, it goes to the tweet again. So
it makes it feel like it's either a
glitch or something like that. Just long story
short, they're deleting tons of content across this
platform right now. Tons of content.
Is that free speech absolutism?
I don't think so. I don't think we
even need to pretend otherwise. It's so weird
how things
that in my experience in this platform, that's
the norm. That dick one day I click
something, it does one thing, the next time
it's something else. At least that's my experience.
How weird is that? You guys saw that.
Rewind it. It happened right when we were
left. Now
past the censorship. But just think about how
that's happening with all that we're about to
get into and all of the other things
we talk about. I mean, this is how
it works today. This is a controlled element
of conversation. They want you to be corralled.
Even when you think you're expressing freely, you're
being corralled and manipulated and advertised and try
and far more than that, and we understand
how far this has been going. But on
Israel and the overlap to that, because Israel
plays an obvious relate
it's related to Mamdani
no matter what. I mean, that's just because
it's obvious and because that's been a stated
part of the conversation, and almost every point
of contention around him
relates to something that Israel in particular has
centered in their agenda.
So
Kenneth Roth points out in a larger point
that connects back to the the protests on
the campuses, and it does relate to exactly
what we're seeing right now with this artificial
astroturfing and gaslighting all over this platform.
Kenneth Roth citing The Guardian, surge in antisemitism
investigate investigations at US, universities.
Read the old line.
We've already actually read more than one article
like this, by the way. This is just
this is as of November 5. Surge in
antisemitism investigations
at US universities after October 7 attacks, data
shows. And the point is
20 at least 24%
of antisemitism
complaints against US universities originated with groups or
individuals
unaffiliated with the university.
Pro Israel organizations were behind 78%.
So 24%
or at least 24% of them
originated from people who weren't even affiliated, and
78% came from groups that aren't necessarily part
of the college. Just pros or groups are
getting involved. And on top of that, everything
else we've shown you about the countless examples
of lies, like being stabbed in the eye
with a flag, Stefanik screaming how they were
saying, kill all the Jews, and the cops
themselves said that didn't even happen in that
school. You know, on and on. There's countless
examples. And the reality of the evidence that
came back that showed that they were being
instigate, they They were throwing things into the
crowds in the moment something happened, then they
fought back and, you know, it it's how
this happens everywhere.
Right? Just like we're seeing with the protests
right now with the left, the right,
it's it's no different what side you're on.
The government or the police in that sense
will create the conflict to justify shutting down
your protest. Same idea here. Right? And this
is we have to remember how our police,
in a lot of ways, and our military,
they're training in many ways alongside the IDF,
ICE as well. That's not every one of
them. It's gonna be the same, but you
are watching those tactics play out in our
country. So when you watch them, the police
alongside the Zionist protesters basically create the justification
to claim that they're racist. It's not hard
to see how this plays out. All I
said on this was pro Israel organizations being
78% of the complaints. Anyone engaging honestly with
the facts already knew this because you can
see it. You could look and see for
yourself this was being
manufactured.
And that's not to say that there's not
racism. The point is that they actually manufactured
enough lies around it to hide whatever might
have been there in the first place, which
is, again, if you actually understand it, the
kind of the real agenda around these people.
The same type of blind adherence to false
narratives is what we already currently see in
The US mainstream partisan discussion.
I feel it's the same influence. Right? So
right now, within the left right divide, you're
seeing the same kind of, like, blind adherence
to what the narrative is versus what the
facts show. And I genuinely think that's at
least in part because of what Israel's doing
here, but it's been going on a long
time.
Here is Mark Levin. Now you might have
seen this on your wake up with us.
I think I might have played it before,
but this is, this is one the clip
we played before from him as well in
this insane this,
set, setting at the co at the coalition.
What is it? The Republican Jewish Coalition.
He said,
you think you're gonna change the world with
your little podcast and your radio show? Not
as long as I'm here. You have to
come through us. Right? So, basically, just enshrining
the what we know that the elitist like
this want the status quo, which is what
they never pretend we all want. They always
pretend like we're gonna change the world, except
they're coming out of the shadows. They are
they are skirt what threat slinking or rather
slithering out of the shadows and basically showing
you, we're not gonna let you do anything
because we like the way this is. We
like the genocide. We like the endless war
state. We like that everyone suffers except the
1%. We like that.
That's what they're telling you. This one is
showing you that it is the woke right,
like, what the real meaning of it, not
the way everyone misrepresents it. The same exact
thing was happening on the left. Cancel culture,
woke identity or rather identity politics.
Same thing. Depending on what category, what what
wedge issue, it's the same concept. The left
being more broad, the right being seemingly focused
on antisemitism,
and some overlapping, you know, with there's plenty
of points you could fold into it, but
the point comes down to censorship.
Canceling people, deplatforming people. Right? Well, here's an
example of Mark Levin for Fox News using
both of those terms exactly.
Would you would you imagine before I even
play this that that the republicans would be
like, cancel people, deplatform them? Well, you should
know that is what's happening. They just don't
like to say it. Well, here's Mark Levin
showing you that they are exactly the same
thing.
Hitler admires,
Stalin admires,
Jew haters,
American haters, Churchill haters.
Right there. I mean, so Amer so just
understand as always, you're allowed to hate whenever
you want. The idea that they claim that
you're not and this is not just from
him because they understand he's an average person
or rather random citizen. Not even that, really,
but he's just not in the government. But
the point is that the government, Trump administration,
as well as the other side when they're
in power, tell you you can't think that.
You can't say those mean words, Biden. Right?
Biden says Trump says you can't hate America.
Well, yeah, you can, guys. I guess you
forgot how to you know, over here, you're
screaming a free speech and ideological freedom, and
then you go, but you can't hate America.
Well, guess what? You're an idiot because you
just said the opposite. You're allowed to think
and hate and feel what you want. When
you break the law, well, that's where things
change.
And that's the same conversation for literally everything
we're dealing with today. When we get into
mom mom Donny, as much as I think
like all the rest of them, he's not
on your side, The reality is that they're
trying to create an idea where he can't
think those things. He can't believe in that
thing. That means he's a bad guy. Well,
then you're saying we don't have freedom in
this country. You gotta pick one. You can't
keep pretending
like it's one or the other. This is
where we are. So So what he's doing
is saying, you can't hate America. Right? Or
or Churchill
haters?
What? You can't so a a guy from
history that's not even so a a
a leader of of The UK, of Britain,
who, by the way, was a horrible person,
very racist, very manipulative.
Yes. But he and he's framed like every
leader of a country as somehow
a, you know, change the world for freedom
and liberty, whatever.
No. You can look it up just like
Hertzel's diary. He's rife. His racism was wild.
I mean, maybe you don't care about that.
Right? That's the point. You can decide what
you want. But Churchill is a person,
and you're telling us Americans we can't hate
Churchill or we're gonna you're gonna deplatform us
and cancel us, which is what he's about
to say, or even Hitler.
Look. You can like and feel what you
want, but the idea you I can say,
look. You're disgusting for thinking that person is
nice, but you can think what you want.
But not not according to the mister freedom,
mister
no censorship, mister constitutional rights and free speech,
except when he doesn't like those things, except
when Israel doesn't like those things.
Errors, Stalin admires, Jew haters,
American haters, Churchill haters. You're damn right we're
gonna cancel them and deplatform them.
It's called the market system.
Damn. Right. Right. The market system. Right. So
when they manipulate things to get what they
want, that's just how the market works. Right?
We were just talking about this on the
wake up about I think it was,
oh, Candace Owens saying, you know, that the
market's always right. Or, really, somebody told her
once the market's always right kind of thing.
Well, no. When you have corruption, is it
they can so when they cheat things into
reality, they guess that's just the way it
works. That's that's that's ridiculous to me. But
what he's saying here is obvious.
Right? And let's not forget that the Zionist
organization
aligned itself with Nazi Germany, aligned itself with
Stalin, tried to anyway, before and during the
final solution. So what he's doing is right
there saying, you
you can't hate the thing. You can't or
supporters with Stalin, but that's the you know,
you there are examples on both sides of
this. You have Zionists who say things that
that
almost glowingly about Nazism and almost glowingly about
what Hitler said. You have examples of not
of of Zionists literally saying that Hitler should
have taken you out to other people who
are orthodox Jews. I play these clips for
you. But see, that makes no sense to
people who can't imagine that world because they
only look through the lens of what the
media tells them is real. You can watch
these things for yourself.
American haters, Churchill haters, you're damn right we're
gonna cancel them and deplatform
them.
It's called the market system.
They don't have a lifetime
job like a bureaucrat
who we're gonna protect.
And if they're your friend
To protect?
Oh, okay. So, yeah, in case you forgot,
this so called journalist believes it's his job
to protect
the bureaucrats.
See, he's an insider elitist oligarch. The he
that's the real the the the media thing
is just the way he presents himself. He
is on the inside. That's at least that's
how he sees himself at this position. Because
if you're gonna be protecting them and going
after us, that's not a journalist. You're not
speaking truth to power. You're literally protecting power
and pushing back people calling it out. You're
a fraud, man. You're an absolute fraud, but
he knows that. At the core, he obviously
knows that. He just want it's it's like
all the rest of them. They need to
present it to the people, the lowest common
denominator.
Probably most of the people well, I'm not
sure how you would frame it to where
there are people in these groups. You know?
Either way,
fraud.
There's something wrong with you.
No Hitler admirer.
Holocaust
denier platformer
should be anybody's friend.
Yes. So now he now he most of
this was barely con concealed at going after
Tucker. But, you know, so now you're not
on the platform anybody. You see how this
was working? This is the same thing that
these people were screeching about and rightly so
at the time when the left was calling.
You can't talk to that person. That makes
you a Nazi. And they were like, oh,
you're such a snowflake.
How am I supposed to have an interview?
Well, yes, rightly so. What about a person
you don't like? Aren't we supposed to flush
out ideas and let so you can expose
to others watching why his ideas are bad?
No. You're supposed to ignore them and never
let them see the light of day because
we like freedom and democracy or whatever. Democracy's
the wrong term. I'm just trying to make
it you know, they're lying about the things
they claim to care about is what I'm
trying to get out here. But the the
obvious reality is that this is,
at its core, about controlling what you can
say and do
every which way from a little different angle
and this being, I guess, the right. But
if you really pull it all back, the
right and the left are identical today outside
of the things they claim they believe in.
Now you maybe they really do in some
cases, but I see I see it like
that for a reason. Because if you look
at the action, you look at the outcome.
I've said this for so long. They're the
same thing. Matter of fact.
You don't get to wrap your psychotic,
mental,
unhinged
Nazi,
Klan,
jihadist,
bullshit
around American patriotism.
Right. Great. Because, you know, Nazi Jihadist, same
thing. Right? Guys, I'm telling you, their their
clumsy vanilla ISIS thing seems to have not
gone away. I'm telling you, I'm gonna get
to something at the end here around that
they're overlapping with Iran. I there's I'm I'm
look. I'm it's my feeling entirely, my prediction,
based on just what I sense and what
I can see, but I my track record's
pretty good in that regard. That I and
I've said this for a while about the
kind of mashing of these things together.
That if they have an effort, if they
have an opportunity
to link Iran
in particular or anything even related to, what,
like, Hezbollah or Hamas to something they claim
is happening through the left in this country,
they will do it. I feel like that's
already starting to be to be done. And,
I mean, it is already done to a
degree. Right? They already have the argument that
the lefts and and Palestine and Hamas supporters,
they're all terrorists. They're literally saying that right
now. But I mean in earnest where it
becomes, like, an actionable thing where they're going,
we have to we're arresting politicians because they're
terrorists or this is how wild this gets.
People like this are not only driving that
into reality, they're literally telling you, you know,
you're so you're somehow it's it's like telling
you that somehow that Hamas is working with
ISIS even, for example, is they're ideologically not
the same and one has fought the other,
but they just try to mash together to
make a point. They hope that you're too
stupid to see through it. I know you're
not.
You don't get to claim
your MAGA
and America first
when you're lining up with the Marxist and
the Islamist and Hamas and the terrorists.
They're terrorists and the terrorists. Well, guess what,
man? You can believe in any ideology. Let's
just take the first one then avoid the,
you know, the part of terrorist because then
that means anyone they disagree with. But listen.
When you're lining up with the Marxist and
the Islamist
Okay. So a Muslim or a Marxist. Okay.
So you can't be America first, which just
means believing in this country's success. Well, what
if they believe that Marxism will butter this
country? I mean, look. If we're not children
about this, we all know, guys. Everyone who's
honest can know that there are people who
believe that, who believe, I don't, who believe
that that ideology will better will better the
lives of Americans. People think socialism, communism, different
variations of it will better American lives. They
genuinely believe that. Some of them think it
will just gain them power. Some of them
just think it's something they can use to
troll the right. The point is there's a
varying positions.
The idea that every one of them is
this secret jihadist
infiltrator,
which I'm sure that's possible too. I know
it's possible. I'm sure there's some cases of
that from Israel, from foreign countries. Yes. But
the idea that you could just broad stroke
and say anybody who believes in this this
idea is a terrorist, monster, jihadist.
No. Some of them just think that. Some
of them think that that think that will
succeed. Some of them maybe misguidedly think it
won't. The bottom line is that he's trying
to broad stroke it in order to make
you think anybody who disagrees with what they
think is the other, the bad guy, the
villain.
And and you're you're not so my point
is that is not the accurate picture. You
must know their honesty. So what he's saying
here is you can't be America first if
you don't agree with us. So does that
make it America first, or does it make
it Mark Levin first, MAGA first, or rather
Trump first? Right? Idea the the team sport
politics first.
This is it just has to be taken,
obviously, that people can believe that they want
this country to be good and differ on
how it should get there. Mind blowing. Right?
How crazy is that? We've completely lost the
nuance in this ridiculous partisan conversation.
People like this, these screaming mindless ideologues will
get you to do whatever they need for
their interests. In this case, you know he's
fighting for Zionism, guys. He's not even quiet
about that.
And we'll get into it right now coming
up here that Zionism is being exposed
by left and right. It's falling apart.
Before we get to that clip, which you
might have seen going around, which is important,
from Turning Point USA of all places, and
the answer is even more crazy,
and Iran connected too. Remember that for the
end. Here is Mark Levin,
who says politicians
who won't condemn Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes,
quote,
need to be afraid.
He says they need to be afraid of
us, he tells a Jewish group gathering a
Republican Jewish Coalition summit in Las Vegas. So
now you can't even believe something different, so
somebody maybe you don't like Tucker. Maybe somebody
else does. And you're saying you can't be
that people who want to believe in Tucker
need to be afraid
of you? I mean, guys, this is insane
rhetoric. These people are insane. This is a
level well beyond we've ever seen. That's not
because Mark suddenly became that. I think people
like this have always been there. They're feeling
either
the opening to or they're desperate and don't
know what else to do next. I think
it's probably both, to be honest, but, realistically,
you need to call this out. Anybody under
as I said, tell us again about free
speech and freedom of ideology, Mark, you utter
hypocrite.
You can't be like, you're not allowed to
we're gonna attack you for that. No. Look.
You can argue that an individual can say,
you know, like, if it's not a government
censorship point, he can, as an individual, say
I'm gonna I wanna make you afraid, but
it's just hypocritical to argue that we're fighting
for freedom of ideology and then attack people
who don't believe your exact ideology. It's just
kind of stupid. Now here,
general Flynn
against Mark Levin. So think of this. Flynn,
who's very, very die hard Republican support, there's
been a little schism, I guess, between the
Trump sport because of what happened between them,
but I guess they've weirdly kinda fallen back
in line for the most part. But in
Mark Levin, in regard to general general Flynn
says this is called foreign interference in The
United States. And he points to a clip
of Tucker Carlson discussing nearly a 100% of
our politicians have an APAC guy. You saw
this. That was Massey. I I might even
have that really quickly.
Yeah. Right here. Republicans who come to me
and say,
that's wrong what APAC is doing to you.
Let me talk to my APAC person.
By the way, everybody but me has an
APAC person. What does that mean, an APAC
person? It's like your babysitter, your APAC babysitter,
who,
is always talking to you for APAC. They're
probably a constituent
in your district,
but they are, you know,
firmly embedded in APAC. And
Every member has something like this?
Every I don't know how it works on
the Democrat side,
but that's how it works on the Republican
side. And when they and when they come
to DC, you go have lunch. Yep. That's
only Israel.
Only Israel. There's literally no other lobbying group
that has that, and APAC is Israel. It's
not hard to understand. I've done entire shows
on the reality of the Zionist,
committee. I forget the original name. The AZP.
I forget. The point was that they ultimately
had an the the original name, and it
was directly tie it was an Israeli entity.
JFK
wanted them to register under Farah as well
as the Dimona Nuclear Institute. And I was
actually really just recently sharing another point about
the Palestinian statehood,
And
Israel pushed back on all of it, and
then JFK died, and then none of it
happened.
You can decide what that means for yourself.
I think it's pretty clear. But overall,
you know, it's just it's always it's always
in front of it's always I I mean,
everything we talk about is it's something kind
of like that, where it's just very, very
it's not that everything's proven,
but very clear, where a detective would look
first, for example. And when you get the
sense that everyone's trying to desperately push you
in a different direction, well, that usually says
something.
But here, the APAC guy,
general Flynn says this is called foreign or
interference. I mean, it is, guys. Again, the
point is that it was originally an Israeli
entity that then never had to register as
far as because of what happened with JFK.
So it and you could put look it
up on Wikipedia. You can easily prove that
they changed the name, and it even says
because they wanted it to appear more American.
It's very, very clear. So Mark Levin says,
wow. Who knew?
At a time like this, they're coming out
of the closet, even some some you'd never
expect. So it's what he means is you're
a racist.
So you mean it's racist to point out
that a foreign government
influencing policy? You know where this goes, guys.
Anyone criticizing
Israel's government gets called a racist because Mark
Levin says you secretly hate Jews. Well, maybe
he secretly does. That has nothing to do
with whether their government is influencing policy. These
people are working for a foreign power, guys.
And and general Flynn says, no, Mark. I
believe this is a legitimate question. Do you
do our elected representatives get financial assistance from
an Israeli lobby? Because the answer is yes.
Period.
Nobody disagrees with that. Not even they disagree
with it. It's about hiding from that reality,
and it says they do get assistance from
big pharma. They get assistance from Cutter. Do
they get assistance from x y z company
or group? We need to know who our
elected representatives are influenced by when we are
making decisions about whether or not we should
vote for them. I believe these are legitimate
questions. Of course, they are. The fact that
he even has to, like, calmly walk this
through is because these people are lunatics, in
my opinion, and he knows what he's gonna
do. You don't need to it's like saying
the sky is blue and everyone push back
about the reality of it. You're going, well,
let me, you know, calmly explain why it
explain why it actually makes sense to consider
that it's blue. We all know it. It's
right there. You can see it, guys. It's
obvious. Now you may disagree with that. That's
what I think it is, obvious. But Mark
Levin
and the response to this whole thing is
just so interesting. They're calling out the obvious
is causing them to now call hardcore supporters
racist.
That's desperation. Now this is why it's so
obvious or or are there one of the
examples of it being that obvious. Chris Menahan
points out, a student at a Turning Point
USA event in Auburn,
asked a very important question.
Then I'll I'll I'll address what I said
afterward. Now this is important. This is, by
the way, what you keep seeing at these
events.
Almost more than any other place,
the acknowledgment of the concern about Israel and
then his response from Trump's family is
I mean, I'm I'm kinda floored, honestly. He
could've you could've acted you could've clumsily put
out a better response. His response shows you
that I think that they I I argue
they were, my opinion, ready for that kind
of question. And that's why this answer seems
to be, like, immediately in one direction.
Well, miss Trump,
I'd like to ask about your father's relationship
with Israel.
He's taken over $230,000,000
from pro Israel groups
During the summer against Iran,
even though he advised against it, Israel
still attacked Iran, and The US still bombed
on behalf of Israel.
Your father's frustrations with Netanyahu
have been made
clear when he cursed on national TV over
the situation.
Israel has not been a great ally to
The US all the way since 1960
when they bombed the USS Liberty.
Israel is a Good round of applause right
there. You know? They you you're not putting
this away. Where Christians are constantly under attack
in both Gaza and the West Bank. Right.
We talk about America first and defending Christians,
but how can we do this if we
align ourselves with a nation that does not
do that itself?
Look at that.
There's just no air in that. That's obvious.
Right? They're persecuting Christians. They're I mean, this
is and and US says Liberty, they're not
an ally. They're not an ally. Right? They're
an enemy is what he's really obviously getting
at to Christianity,
to American interests.
Here's how Trump's son answers.
There's no question my my father said frustration.
In fact, I think he says frustration throughout
the whole conflict with with both sides. At
the same time,
make no Oh, is it is it talk
about both sides in the issue.
Right? He's he didn't ask about that. He
was really yeah. It was both sides. Hamas
too. Because he knows, in my opinion, that
Israel will not be happy with them going,
yes. He had issues with Israel. So you
gotta be like, no. It was with the
whole general thing. Anyway a mistake.
You have a nation that is chanting death
to America every single day on The States,
streets of Tehran.
You have a nation that will develop a
nuclear weapon, and you have a nation that
will use that nuclear weapon against the western
way of life. There's no question about it.
You Notice something. Look real quickly. The guy
wants to get the microphone back. This is
not answering his question, and, clearly, this is
just the talking points, but not even really
addressing the point. Because we're see, what he
said was about bombing Iran. That was the
only connection to it. The had nothing to
do with whether Israel in the in the
his response has nothing to do with whether
Israel's influencing The United States.
What he's saying is that Iran bad guy.
Iran wants to kill America. Iran nuclear bomb.
By the way, all of which so far
have been either complete misrepresentations
or outright lies. There are the as always,
the idea that you can easily prove, even
acknowledged by the US government, is that the
majority of Iranians
love America and The United States. They don't
love our government. You see? Because they're not
there. This is what is happening in the
world today. People are very obviously aware that
it's the government that's the problem. And you
can the government even the government says that.
When they say very clearly, when they address
the translation, they're saying death to America. The
translation, what they're saying is death to the
American imperialist
government control. They'll say that. You ask them.
I've had I've had many interviews with people
who travel through Iran
completely people that are pro either side and
and very clearly come back showing you the
opposite of what they frame and opposite about
some restrictive,
you know, complete Muslim controlled territory. It's not
the case, not even with the hijab. Yes,
they've got laws. It's not really enforced everywhere.
Lies everywhere you go, guys. Highly technologically advanced
in Iran. They're not what we or in
any of these places, by the way. Same
with Palestine.
They are trying to create an image of
the other.
What he's doing right now is going Iran,
bad guy, Iran, bad guy. Now look. I
was gonna show you is look at the
guy just quickly reaching for the microphone. I
thought this is telling The weapon against the
western way of life. There's no question about
it. You have a nation that will use
proxies around the world, whether it's Yemen, whether
it whether it's a lot of other ones.
Nope. Nope. Not proxies. You can prove this,
by the way. In fact, you can far
more prove the groups they're pointing to. All
of them are being funded and trained and
worked with by The US and Israel. That's
the reality of this. That's one of the
main points of today as we go to
FBI point. That ISIS, Al Qaeda, the group
they're literally saying are proxies of the bad
guys they're pointing to,
are their groups that they've worked with and
funded. It's so insane where we are. To
inflict serious, serious harm on the station, and
they don't hide it. They don't hide it.
In fact, you know, it's really interesting. About
a year ago, maybe a little over a
year ago,
they put out the Ayatollah in Iran. Okay.
Just so you're clear, we're we're now way
into Iran. Iran and Badmuran, things Iran
bad. Okay. Does that answer the question? No.
Not even close. And put out an emoji,
a little short video clip
of a drone hovering over my father's
head as he played golf. This was literally
posted on the Ayatollah's
Yeah. You know, Twitter page. Yeah. Yeah. Which
is which is I I argue crazy. Right?
But how is that any different than every
single thing you see from the ridiculous PR
marketing team that is Trump's administration right now?
Every day, they do stuff like that. Every
day, they post videos. And I mean, like,
way worse than that. Videos I mean, even
about Americans dumping
extra bit on people protesting from a jet
or showing images of Palestine being completely occupied
and destroyed. Like, these are or images of
them doing terrible things to people. Guys, this
has been shared and publicized.
It's just as always, especially with this broken
team sport politics child game they play, that
it's always okay when they do it bad
when the other side does it. And they
all do the same thing. They all wanna
send to the other side and gripe when
the other side does it. It's just pathetic,
and they know that, though. So what he's
doing right now is going Iran did a
thing that we that, had a video with
a drone above Trump. Well, yes. We all
know what that's supposed to insinuate.
Is it a crime? No. But see, what
he's doing is look at what they did,
the same thing we do. Therefore, they're the
worst country in the world we have to
destroy. Following my father around a golf course
with with a with a crosshair right on
top of him as if they wanted to
assassinate him and as if they wanted to
hurt him. You know, like how they literally
assassinated Soleimani with no justification
in a under the guise of a peace
deal on a foreign,
territory they occupy
on an in an airport that's international.
That's the reality. Soleimani or any number of
other examples that we could point to that
Trump has literally assassinated people, or Israel has
assassinated endlessly
entire groups of people in politics, entire people
in Qatar, entire groups in Lebanon, people that
are in the midst of a negotiation for
peace.
That doesn't matter, though. Guys, Iran wanted to
destroy our way of life. They wanted to
hurt us. Oh, did they? I'd love an
example other than what The US screams that
we never see any evidence for or all
the examples you keep yelling about our armist,
to hasten our freedom. And yet everything we
see is The US and Israel and and
The UK destroying places in the world under
the guise of that being possible.
I mean, think about this for a second
and look back and you show me the
example where Iran is doing anything that affects
American life. Anything.
Not narratives, not put proxy,
the actual reality. Hey. They're just lying to
you. And I I am of the mind
most Americans know this today. They wanted to
inflict
real pain. What I can tell you about
my father is in terms of of By
the way, I'm sorry. Think about him saying
they wanted to inflict pain. This is the
kind of childish thing we do. You you
know what they think and feel. This guy
people like that need to be laughed at
in the moment.
You know what they feel they wanted to
inflict pain? That's stupid. That's worthy of ridicule.
I I mean, you could always argue enemies
want to have you suffer, but you never
know that. You don't know what they're thinking.
Just this is where we always have to
laugh about this stuff and go, man, that's
too but that's left right paradigm all day
long. Everything they say is hyperbolic, emotional, and
completely broad and undefined.
It used to at least be attempted to
be somehow rooted, not today.
Of Israel.
He wants a peaceful Middle East. He wants
peace around the world. He wants As he's
covering all these countries and destroying everything and
siding with the genocide. Of course, he does.
The killing. He did that with India and
Pakistan. He did No. He didn't. Like, they
love this eight wars in eight week months.
It's not true. Didn't happen. Right? There's still
obvious issues between Azerbaijan.
This there were agreements that were made, and
the thing is still exactly where it was.
Just like with Israel and Gaza, just like
with Ukraine and Russia,
they just lied. That obviously, you saw what
he did with Cambodia
and Thailand. Jeez. He's tried to stop every
con Oh, meanwhile, remember the question?
Like, basically sick and tired
of the death and destruction. So there have
been times that he got mad at Netanyahu.
There's plenty of times where he's gotten mad
at Putin. There's times where he's been mad
at Zelensky. And he uses all of that
as a tool
to stop pain and destruction
and death of of Oh, you see. So
what he's saying is, whenever something happens that
you think looks bad or doesn't feel like
it's going the right way, don't worry, wink
wink. It's a secret Trump plan to make
it all work out. And whatever ends up
happening, we'll tell you that was always the
plan.
People that are our age, you know, your
age in most cases, who have become political
pawns and who have been marched into literally
trenches
and killed
by the millions.
And that's what my father wants to see
end Yeah. In Ukraine apparently. Now we're on
Ukraine somehow. Right this second and that's why
he's worked so hard for peace around the
world. In fact, Donald Trump is the only
president in United States history
that's never
brought America to war, and I hope he
keeps following in that country. I mean, how
can you even say this is the game
of playing like we never declare so if
you never allow Congress to declare war while
claiming that you have the power to go
to war, then you can always ever say
we never actually went to war because Congress
never declared it. But you say you have
the right to do it. So if you're
arguing that you have a right to do
it and you didn't have to get Congress
to do it, then that by logic, de
facto means that you did start a war.
But who cares about the facts or basic
logic?
Of course, he's at war bombing Somalia more
than any country in history in the last
year. Or not history. Excuse me. In a
US,
administration
in a year, more than ever. It's insane.
He broke a record. Or in regard to
occupation that continues everywhere else or the bombing
of,
what was the other one? Just gonna say.
Just slipped my mind. But, you know, the
the reality of Israel and Palestine, right, the
ongoing support, that is an ongoing US war.
There's no denying that.
The idea that you can ever claim
that he hasn't started is the same lie
they put forward the first time.
Now and watch
as we see more,
unfortunately,
in the next so many years. Same.
Very well. President in The United States history
that's
never brought America to war, and I hope
he keeps following in that crusade.
I mean, you realize he went to Syria.
Right? I mean, like, you can always but
he starts at, like, continuing to redeploy.
The guy you know, what about the war
on ISIS? The war on drugs? The war
this is stupid. But realize that none of
that addressed the question at all. Not even
close.
Now I don't I I think
in response to the nukes from Iran, Israel
has nuclear weapons and is not a part
of the IEA unlike Iran.
Look at that. And
Now in case you don't know that, he's
talking about the International Atomic Energy Agency, and
the point is that Iran very much has
it works with them and, verifiably, even according
to the US state department right now, does
not have nuclear weapons.
Israel
does, and everyone knows it, and they refuse
to work with them.
It's just sad to see because
I've never seen
the American president
get treated the way he does by the
Israeli government. Mhmm.
Here's what I'll add.
Do we or do we not have phase
one of a peace agreement in the What
are you talking about? What I mean, it
this is so insane for them to just
go, look at the thing we just claimed
we have. What he's try she's trying to
say that we made a peace deal with
Israel. Okay. Let's just even say that's the
truth. What does that have to do with
the question?
You guys already know this. Just accentuating the
point for those that might not,
you know, be a regular viewer or might
not understand what we're getting at. The point
is clear.
They're trying to deflect from the obvious because
they don't know let's put it this way.
They don't have anything to say. There's nothing
you can say because that's what's happening, and
their job is to push into any but
look at the great thing Trump did over
here and then lie about that too because
he didn't do that thing. Middle East right
now.
Here's what I'll add.
Do we or do we not have phase
one of a peace agreement in The Middle
East
right
now?
Wait. Did she say it? Peace agreement in
The Middle East right now. So phase one.
I mean, it and don't forget Israel violated
it, I want, hundreds of times just in
the first couple of weeks. Right? It continues
to do so now, has executed people, put
the yellow line, won't let them go home,
stop food. I mean, it's just over and
over and over, which we'll go into the
next show. The bodies that were returned were
decomposed beyond recognition, means they didn't keep them
in refrigerated areas, meaning they stole and on
top of that, they stole all the organs
that came back yet again. You know, but
but peace, though, as they're still being bombed
and still suffering and still being tortured, but
peace, though.
Nothing is ever gonna be perfect,
but I'll tell you what. This president works
with what he has. He believes in peace
through strength. And whether we're talking about in
The Middle East, whether we're talking Still the
same response, by the way, to the obvious
question. About a forty year war like Armenia
and Azerbaijan
as Which is not over. The idea that
you argue these things are over is the
stupidest comment in the room.
Eric just pointed out a five day war
in Thailand and Cambodia.
This is a president of peace,
and sometimes you have to be slightly unconventional
with how you get there. You you Yeah.
The constitution. Pasha. Who cares about those little
things? Just brush it all aside. Just pretend
everything's great. Right? Who cares about the foundational
elements of what we believe allow this country
to exist the way it is? Just put
it aside. I mean, that's what they're doing.
It's not gonna be perfect. You know? Maybe
we'll make a couple mistakes like Elon said
in the beginning. Major manipulations that we're laying.
Maybe we'll make a mistake.
They're hoping you give them the benefit of
the doubt that you should never,
not even once, ever give a politician the
benefit of the doubt. I want you to
really think about that for a second. Never.
You should always assume the worst and always,
though, wait to verify things and expect proof.
If they don't, I would assume the worst.
They're probably lying to you because in history,
they have. Don't assume that's the case. But
my point is I mean, I I guess
that's contradictory. My point is assume the worst
in the sense of likely. Not that you
know for sure. Right? But saying that in
the common saying of it seems contradictory when
you say it in the second part. But
the point is always, if you always look
at a politician and say he's most likely
deceiving me, he's most likely himself being deceived
and doesn't know it. One, historically, you're most
likely gonna be correct. And two, you're not
going to giving the benefit of the doubt
to somebody who is in a position of
power that benefits from the outcome is going
to eventually abuse that. I mean, historic is
history is rife with examples.
But giving if you assume they're right all
the time, you can obviously see the way
that will work against you.
Right? If you're assuming they're wrong, well, you'll
be happily surprised when they're right. If you're
assuming they're right, they're going to trick you.
I mean, let's just say they don't intend
to. Somebody will trick them, and you'll never
even know. I mean, it's quite obvious to
see where this goes. These people, by the
way, didn't even try to address the question
of whether Israel is influencing this government.
You know what they're doing. It's very clear
what's happening. And it is one of the
most obvious parts of this conversation that they
are influencing,
I think, everything in this country. There is
no propagandizing
away this growing Israel awareness, guys. It's not
going away. The world now
finally understands the dark truth about Israel and
Zionism. And the US government, all of it,
is very worried about that, about what that
is revealing about their long history of selling
out to it.
Now
in regard to mom Donnie or, yeah, mom
Donnie,
couple points here I wanna go over, and
then I wanna get into the actual claims
and so on. This is just funny to
me. This is
but I just wrote that the dumbest people
in the room are the most influential on
the mainstream conversation today. I really mean that.
I mean, it's pretty obvious to see the
people that are with the with the most
shallow,
partisan,
compliant takes are the ones that get the
most reach on this platform.
And I said, talk about two party illusion,
talk about clown world. Here's cat turd. Trump's
on fire this morning, and it says any
Jewish person that votes for Zoran Mondani,
a proven self professed Jew hater, is a
stupid person.
That's the same thing he said about people
calling out that
the burning the flag being prosecuted is,
unconstitutional,
pointing out doing things that suppress people online
or unconstitutional, and he called them both stupid
and well, it was stupid and something else,
stupid people. Meaning that, you know, you're right,
and he calls you stupid because you see
that he's wrong. In this case,
he's calling Mandani a proven Jew hater. And
this appears to be obviously not true based
on who knows what he thinks and feels
internally. But what he's doing is saying because
he supports
Palestine, calls on Israel, that that's the reality.
Could be, but this is always the game
they play. Now I'm gonna get into the
reality of why I don't think anybody should
trust any politician, and especially this person in
regard to where this seems to be going.
But I wanna point this out first. Now
as always from COVID, what what we try
to do is argue from within the narrative.
Right? And what I mean by that is
showing, okay. Here's something they're saying that I
believe is a lie.
Then a week later, here's a new thing
they say that I believe is a lie,
but this new lie
contradicts that lie they told a moment ago
or a week ago. So I think there's
an importance in showing you that. Right? So
this new lie, even though they're both lies,
is proving they were lying before because it
can't both be possible. So, like, with COVID,
that's what we're kinda arguing from within their
claims then showing their new claim prove that
person was wrong anyway. Right? That's important.
So what I'm saying in this is to
think about it from, like, okay. Let's say
he is the person they're claiming he is,
or let's say he does secretly infiltrate for
for Muslims. Like, thinking thinking through these then
making points about how even that is being
shown to be false because of what they're
saying. But first,
the Jewish person hating Jews. The the common
I mean, you realize, first of all, why
they're doing that? Because he's not committing crimes.
He's not out there doing anything that is
illegal. Now you are aside from the argument
that there may have been election manipulation, which
I'll never push back on. I think it
happens
election manipulation, which I'll never push back on,
I think it happens every time, that's not
the point I'm making here. We'll address that
in a second. It's simply that what they're
arguing about him being infiltrating and he's gonna
turn, Sharia law and over the I there's
very little to back up almost everything they're
saying about him. Not to say that it's
not possible. What I can see is somebody
who very much calls out Israel, and that
seems to be an obvious, what we just
showed you, central problem for the US government,
which is being controlled by a Zionist government,
in my opinion. And so now you have
somebody who's saying bad Israel. And so I'm
not saying that the insiders, because I think
there's more coordination here than you realize, but
the people online, the large influencers that maybe
don't understand the bigger game are going, he's
a Jew hater. Laura Loomer. He hate Jews.
He's a Muslim because that's the game.
But either way,
just because he supports Palestine, that becomes the
allegation. Now here
oh, and then as I said, dumbest people
in the room, right, to make that point,
lives with TikTok. Trump is dropping truth bombs.
Lives with TikTok. Why? Because he says if
you vote for him, you're that you're stupid.
Truth bomb?
The new media. Very intelligent people. But here's
the point.
You show I saw actually, I don't think
I played this on the show, but I
I talked about it. I pointed to it.
Ian Carroll says, this is insane. I mean,
it really is. If you remember this, this
was when they were running
and what they all had to say about
Israel, and it was so forced and so,
like,
abrasive.
I don't know how you can misunderstand this.
Well, so watch this.
And in regard to the Israel point and
keep in mind that I'm not in no
way am I saying this is the guy
we should support. I think all of them
are not on your side.
First foreign visit by a mayor of New
York is always considered significant. Where would you
go first?
Left. Right? Miss Adams.
First visit. I would visit the homeland. Going.
Mister Cuomo? Holy Given the hostility and the
antisemitism
that has been,
shown in New York, I would go to
Israel.
The mayor of New York.
Why in the world you would go anywhere?
You think about that for a second. Why
why would you fly to a foreign country?
You're you're not in the federal government. How
does that make sense at all? Mister Tilson,
where would you go? Yeah. I'd make my
fourth trip to Israel followed by my fifth
trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies,
fighting on the front lines of the the
global war on terror. Mister Mamdani?
I would stay in New York City. My
plans are to address New Yorkers across the
five boroughs and focus on that. Mister Mamdani,
can I just jump in? Would you visit
Israel
as mayor? I will be doing as the
mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish New
Yorkers, and I'll be meeting them wherever they
are across the five boroughs, whether that's in
their synagogues and temples
or at their homes or at the subway
platform. Because, ultimately,
we need to focus on delivering on their
concerns. And just Yes, sir. Really quickly. So
just for to the the he hates Jews
point, I mean, you're not gonna find as
far as, like, as far as I've seen,
you're not gonna find anything out there that's
even close to evidence of that outside of
he supports Palestine, therefore, he hates Jews. This
is the best you're gonna get from that
as far as I can tell. So right
there, he's simply going, oh, I just work
with the Jewish community and, you know, so
it doesn't seem to be the case. Of
course, you could be lying. But this is
so wild to me. So ask directly, would
you go to Israel? No. I'm gonna I'm
gonna focus on New York.
Obviously, a valid point. Right? Here's how she
forces this in. There's more going on here.
I mean, we all know where this comes
from.
Their synagogues and temples or at their homes
or at the subway platform because, ultimately,
we need to focus on delivering on their
concerns as we see. Or no. Do you
believe in a Jewish state of Israel?
What is that where would that even come
from? Why would that be a point of
any kind? Why would a question about a
foreign state being able to exist, whatever the
context, have any bearing on whether you're the
mayor of New York?
Think about that. Obviously, you know why, guys,
because this is
Israel having its say, its influence
over even local I mean, there the point
is APAC and the rest, I mean, they've
lost a lot of ability because of how
they're overextended and everything's happening today. But before
October 7, I mean, they were extending as
far as they could, even into local everything,
sheriffs. I mean, you can see how this
has gone as far as it can. And
so the fact that they're pushing that, it
just shows you the game in my opinion.
Yes or no. Do you believe in a
Jewish state of Israel? I believe Israel has
the right to exist. It gets worse. Not
a As a Jewish state notice. As a
state with equal rights. Wow. He won't he
won't say it has a right to exist
as a Jewish state be very And his
answer All of the rest of them jump
on him for that because they're trying to
win. And they know if they gush over
Israel more than anybody, they'll so he says
a state with equal rights. I mean, this
is like black lives matter. No. All lives
matter. Do you believe black lives matter? I
just said all lives matter. Again, it's like
this is the stupidest thing. And this, ladies
and gentlemen, is exactly what the right's doing
now, whereas it was what the left did
before. They're the same thing. In principle, in
action, this is the same ideals.
Alright? They're trying to turn like, remember, the
left, if you forgot, was trying to say
that you're not allowed to say all lives
matter because that somehow means you don't think
black lives matter. It's just the stupidest,
stupidest part of the conversation. Now you see
the same thing happening in reverse. Or I
get not in reverse, but just, you know,
the same kind of idea.
Wouldn't a state with all right free rights
for everybody, wouldn't that be what you're talking
about? No. That's not what they even want.
You understand? They're supporting a state for only
Jews. I'll show you that again from Netanyahu
stating explicitly, no. It's the state for the
Jews alone. And then on top of that,
if you're an Ethiopian Jew or even slightly
not the norm, you're you're cast aside like
you are not part of it or an
Orthodox Jew who doesn't believe in Zionism. You're
beat up every day. So So it's about
Zionism, if you care to understand. But no,
he won't visit Israel. I I said that
for That's what he was trying to say.
No. No. No. Unlike you, I answer unlike
you, I answer the question first directly. Alrighty.
My my goal would be to take my
first trip to Israel. My wife's life work
in this area means a lot to our
family, and it could coincide with my young
son, Miles, in bar mitzvah, if you'd like
to have the bar mitzvah. Okay. But
There's just no misunderstanding
any of that, guys. Now, yeah, you can
make that about Jewish people alone if you
want to. It's not the reality.
The truth is very clear. This government has
overwhelming
influence to the point to where it can
have you have moderators forcing the acknowledgment of
a Jewish state despite that having no bearing
on the point that you're running for or
the question itself. He just said yes. It's
state for everybody. That's not enough. You have
to make it specifically about Jews alone even
though that wasn't even the question. But you
will you have to because we know what
you're really doing, wink wink. It's like, this
is just it's so alarming to see how
far this goes.
So here
is the clip from Trump to remember. Right?
So the whole thing from Mark Levin,
Jew haters no. Okay. Well, as I've said
every time,
the way when they're saying that, in most
cases, they're talking about people they think, wink
wink, mean that when they say free Palestine.
That's not the reality. Not even they're sure
there's an overlap, but first of all, they
could never know that for sure. Secondarily,
in my experience, most everybody saying that is
fighting for equal rights, for two state solution.
Not for one side, obviously, two state solution,
for both sides. That's the reality. Israel is
the one that doesn't want that. That's been
clear the entire time if you're paying attention.
But so my point is that that's usually
how they're framing that. But even if you
are somebody who just irrationally hates Jewish people,
I think that's gross and you have a
right to think what you want. You can
say and think what you want, guys. That's
what we pretend is this case. So when
he's saying that, you could argue he's pointing
at Palestine supporters, but either way, he's saying
we are going to remove people from this
country who have ideas we disagree with.
I do this every time, and there's no
misunderstanding
this, guys. You have to understand this is
a app an absolute
core value contradiction
of first principles. Just like
even attempt even discussing,
deporting American citizens
or ICE and the martial law rollout. No.
I mean, every day we see more violations
of our rights.
We will remove
the jihadist
sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our
So here is a long thread of all
this is before he was selected
of his campaign trail with all his real
flags next to American flags every time because
that's normal, and the money he got from
Miriam Adelson and all different times he told
you he would work for their interest, Israeli
interest over American interest. And now we're watching
that take place, and people still ignore it.
But keeping this in mind, let's talk about
the actual overlap to mom, Donnie, mom, Donnie,
and the election. Now you know my opinion
about this. I don't believe
that's not absolute in every possible facet, but
it's I'm of the mind, and it could
be, I'm of the mind that our our
votes do not translate to the outcome. There's
a reason that I say it that way.
You could argue that there's different parts of
it. It's not complete or even you know,
who knows? But at the end of the
day, whether it's all or some or whatever
it is, that the outcome, it does not
translate to what you all did is what
happens. And I think we can prove that.
And that's what happens every time is the
other side goes, they cheated or this happened
or voting machine. I agree with all of
it. Not that you can assume it happens
every time everywhere, but that we know it
happens almost every time to some degree. And
I've covered this my entire career doing this.
So, what's important to think about is that
kind of overlap. Again, this is what I'm
talking about arguing from within the narrative. So
that being the case from my my perspective,
that it happens every single time and at
the end of the day, I don't even
think that this is what's really going on,
that there's somehow some secret element to steal
one versus the other. I think that there's
I think long ago, this whole process was
taken from us, if it ever was there
to begin with. That's just my opinion, but
it's rooted in what I think I can
prove. But no one, I think, could argue
that entirely for sure, so it comes down
to what you believe.
My point in showing you this is because
here's two examples of Elon Musk and other
large accounts getting
just like with Venezuela in the last time,
putting things out that are false, incorrect, misrepresentations,
which then see the idea that the elections
were stolen even though even Trump's saying the
opposite, at least in one case.
So Elon says the New York City ballot
is a form is a scam. No ID
required. No main mayoral candidates appear twice other
mayoral candidates appear twice. Cuomo's name is last
in his bottom right.
Then that girl simply says, here's why. Why
do you lie so much? You have issues
with with how New York does their election,
then say that. But why do you cause
panic by lying? So her point is, yes,
there are issues that we can should be
addressed, but you're framing it as if this
is deliberate election manipulation, which, again, I do
believe happens almost every time, but this does
not appear to be won. This guy says
IDs aren't required, but address confirmation and signatures
are. That is true.
Zoran is on twice because he's the nominee
for both Democrat and working family parties, which
is true. Didn't drop in time. Cuomo lost
the primary. A non major parties are not
labeled first. All these are true. So
this guy says signature checks are moronic and
don't hold up. I agree with that. Not
required ID is a major issue. Also agree
with that. And she says, I'm all for
it. Voter ID. Now I don't know if
I agree. I feel like the voter ID
level overlaps alarmingly with digital ID and where
this is going. My point is from a
from a principle point, rather, what seems to
be the most,
less open for manipulation, I would agree with
the point. And and she says, I live
in a state that requires it. My point
is, and this is where I agree with
her, if he has issues with the voting
process, right, then say it. Like, the functional
issues that may be more ripe for manipulation.
But he's insinuating a rigged election because his
perverted candidate is about to lose. Elon endorsed
Cuomo.
I agree with that. So he's using things
that are not this is simply issues that
should be corrected versus things that were deliberately
done, which is not just this one. You
understand? He's playing on the ignorance of individual
people. This one
got fact checked even by Twitter.
So this guy puts a post out. It
says, arrived in New York City two days
ago. I'm not a US citizen or even
a resident, and I was able to get
in and vote early. So here's what's this
is why this is so crazy to me.
He
followed up right away and said, that's a
joke, by the way. This is where I
took the picture from. Anyone doubting the legitimacy
of the election is a moron. Now you
I I doubt we should obviously doubt it.
Whether it's happening or not, questioning it is
what you should do. It's in our interest
to question whether it's being because they politicians
cheat all the time. But what's funny to
me is that he took this and then
used this to sort of troll people. And
then even this comes out and says, that
post is a joke as explained by Zolt.
Okay.
So,
here is,
a lot of people, by the way,
Alexander Donegan. He's a Republican candidate for US
Senate, and he says, this is exactly how
elections are stolen. This man is openly bragging
about how we arrived. So you take it
at face value
without any due diligence? Yes. Because that's how
partisanship
works. And he goes,
and is not a resident or a citizen.
He yet he was able to still go
and cast a vote for Jihad Mondani. Jihad
Mondani.
It's just these are children, guys. It's just
so sad to see the hyperbolic. Like, you
if you think that's the case, then make
your case. Prove that. Argue that there's and
what you mean by jihad, that he's a
Muslim.
Right? I mean, it's it's lazy, bigoted race
rhetoric, and and it's in the interest of
everything other than American interest. But
they're wrong. Right? So this guy sharing this
from a very prominent position who is a
candidate for senate
because he just blind my point is simple,
guys. I don't think I might have said
it. Yeah. I said team sport partisans will
share whatever appears to back up their opinion.
Simple.
Doesn't matter, though, because everyone does it on
the partisan side. I don't think that's the
majority, though. But so does this mean there's
no manipulation? No. No. I'm not even getting
into that today because I don't even think
it's worth verifying
from my moment perspective in the show. It
is in plenty of other context because I
know I do believe it happens. I do
believe we all know that. Left, right, as
far back as you wanna look, you can
prove what's been going on. That my look.
My opinion is the machines themselves have been
rip like, not just they've been designed to
be cheated for a long time. We keep
talking about how they call it out and
then no one does anything. They use the
same ones every time. Trump says they stole
it, then the same things happen again. I
mean, it just makes sense if you have
two brain cells to erupt together. On top
of that, as you know, I don't think
they translate to the outcome. So I'm not
in the interest of trying to break down
the nuance of how something was stolen from
something I don't even think exists. I hope
that makes sense. Not to say that it
might not be important. Do do the work
yourself. Break it down.
But I think where we are
is that they will lie about anything, so
it's impossible to know what you can take
at face value. You should question everything always.
Do your due diligence.
But is there actually change that took place?
Are we watching a no. One of these
gaslighting, astroturfing kind of meme situations take place
like with Venezuela. Or look at the rigged
things. Nope. That was where mailboxes from two
years ago. You got caught lying. They do
it every single time.
You know, it or like this, for example,
the White House,
which I take as Trump, but, you know,
who knows who's running it. It's still the
Trump White House. And it says, the map
that left me the the the map that
made the left cry,
never forget. Okay. Well, we've gone over this
already.
It's a map that looks like, man, look,
everything's red in this country. They're all cheating
because that's the simplest thing I can take
from it. Right? That's the they play the
dumbest people in the room. Well, I'm not
gonna say that there's not cheating because I
think that there is. But as we said
last time, he says, it's sad to see
the official White House account sharing this stupidity.
Land doesn't vote.
People
do. Here is an animated version of your
map, which is true. I've I've already made
this point before.
The transitions between county
and actual population,
meaning that the largely, the blue areas are
where the vast majority of people live. That's
usually the cities and everything else. The point
is that you could make color in every
blank space, which there's gonna be some scattered
people that live there as all red, but
the truth is the population
is minimal compared to these larger that's just
the way it is.
So I argue that this is broken for
a lot of reasons that we should the
this is what the game is played every
time. Whether it's for things like gerrymandering or
they it's it's set up for them to
manipulate for their benefit, and they're all cheating
as best they can. Overall, it just shows
you they're being misrepresented.
Divide and conquer, guys. I think that's how
this works.
Now here is Caroline Caroline Levitt. And I
just think it's the way he frames it,
it's which is pretty close, except he quotes
it. I think it's you know, you know
how I feel about that. The president posted
on True Social that voting underway in California
is rigged. What evidence does he have of
that? And She said there's fraud in California.
It's just a fact. What evidence is that
of that? Is there? She goes, just a
fact. If you want if you want evidence,
I'll provide it for you. And doesn't. Now
it's kinda what happens, to be honest, but
I don't like that it's quoted, but watch
the clip for yourself.
The argument is you're asking for the evidence,
and you're supposed to be doing that in
this is your job right now. You're supposed
to be presenting evidence to show them or
at least giving them the things that you
can go to, and she doesn't.
President posted on true social as the voting
underway in California is, quote, rigged.
What evidence does he have of that, and
what does it mean that mail in ballots
in that state are under legal and criminal
review?
By whom and why? And, also, in this
vein, does the White House still plan to
issue an executive order banning
mail in voting, and what legal authority do
you have to do that? So first, she
answers the point is just to hear I
don't have this tweet, but just remember this
because I have other examples.
Trump did state on True Social that it
was rigged. Okay? So you have to understand.
If he's out here saying this is why
we lost and making arguments for why there's
an issue with other things that happened or
in the middle of his meeting talking about
how the shutdown hurt them, but then otherwise
going it's rigged, he's playing everybody, guys, because
he wants that momentum from the mindless followers
who are gonna do whatever they can to
help him because they think it's rigged, but
then also addressing the people that are more
rational in the room when you can say,
who knows what's true? But the point is
you can't claim both arguments.
Right? On top of that, when they said
that they were going to be investigating the
ballots, well, here we go. Get ready for
another three years of nonstop investigation that amount
to absolutely nothing, whether evidence or not, by
the way, just like last time.
White House is working on an executive order
to strengthen our elections in this country and
to ensure that there cannot be blatant fraud
at Blatant. Make sure there's no blatant fraud.
Okay? As we've seen in California with their
universal mail in voting system, it's absolutely true
that there are fraud in there's fraud in
California's elections.
It's just Yeah. It's true. Self is true
to every other state and federally.
Right? So let's remember that. That's easy to
understand. It's a fact.
It it is just a fact. They have
a universal mail in voting system, which we
know is ripe for fraud. And if you
want to Okay. But being ripe for fraud
or ripe for that's not the same as
saying you could prove fraud. Right? But see,
I don't think she even understands that. Well,
the point is that I would agree that
there's fraud. It's very con it's it's consistent.
But I would argue that you have to
prove this if you're gonna do anything about
it. Right? But they never do. So she's
saying, yes. We've right. We just know it.
We just know it. Well, I would agree
that it does happen. But that's when you're
in this position and you're trying to investigate,
well, then you were required to verify what
you're saying. I'm not of the mind that
they ever want this to go away. Like,
this is if you understand the two party
illusion, you understand that by keeping everybody focused
on this one thing and everyone fighting each
other, they can do whatever they want. I
thought I'm happy to provide you all of
the evidence for it. I'd be glad to
send that to you after this briefing. Oh,
what? After the brief? Well, I just asked
you now, and you said we know for
a fact. Then discuss it. Break it down.
So that's I agree with the way they
frame that. How stupid is that? Yes. It's
a fact. We I'll you want evidence? I'm
happy to provide it. Well, that was my
question. How about right now? Rigged.
I'm happy to provide you all of the
evidence for it. I'd be glad to send
that to you after this briefing. Rigged.
Fraudulent ballots that are being mailed in, in
the names of other people, in the names
of illegal aliens who shouldn't be voting in
American elections. There's Yeah. I mean, guys, we
know this happens. Like, in a, again, in
a general sense, the mail in manipulation is
why it shouldn't be the case, but why
they but understand,
this has addressed his first administration. Now he's
here again. How much you wanna bet it
doesn't even change this entire next so many
years? It certainly could. I don't think again,
you know my opinion. I don't think it
actually translates to the outcome anyway. But the
point is to are you having this kind
of, question mark always
works for the power structure, in my opinion?
Countless examples, and we'd be happy to provide
them. As for executive action the White House
is taking, yes, we are looking into that.
And like any executive order, of course, any
executive order the president signs is within his
full executive authority and within the context of
the I don't you love how stupid she
is. So he can sign an executive authority
saying he can do whatever he wants anywhere
in the world, and apparently that's within his
authority because he can do that because he
signed it. I mean, think about this again.
Look at what she just said. Executive action
the White House is taking. Yes. We are
looking into that. And like any executive order,
of course Like any executive order any executive
order the president signs is within his full
Like any executive order, any executive order he
signs is within his authority.
I mean, this is the kind of thing
where he says, like, under article two, I
can do whatever I want. This is what
they're doing, and this is what they seem
to actually think. But if if we lived
in a world where people actually cared, like,
from the paradigm, not all on one side
pretending to fight each other, then this would
be insane. You could come out and get
all of these things. He could be impeached
for stuff like this, not her saying it,
but him saying so and acting like he's
got upward you know, constitution or doesn't bind
what I can do. These guys are authoritarian.
They're dictators, and it's no different than last
time. Look at COVID.
But overall,
this is obvious.
You asked for the evidence. You didn't give
the evidence. You say, I'm happy to provide
the evidence, but there is none. How much
you wanna bet nothing ever comes of that?
Now watch. If she doesn't ever give you
something that proves that's the case, but just
keeps saying we know we've proven it like
they do every time, then there's probably not
proof. Don't assume that either, though, but demand
evidence or proof.
This is just funny. It's actually right there
too. How funny is that? I can't believe
I never noticed that.
Look on this picture of the podcast,
whitewashing.
It's so perfect for all of them, for
KJP, for anybody standing there. I just it's
so the sign behind her is the white
White House in Washington. And just right this
picture shows whitewashing behind her. I just think
that's perfect.
Okay. Five times August. Now here's what Trump
said on a different true social post. The
Democrats are far more likely to win the
midterms in the next presidential election if we
don't do the termination of the filibuster because
it will be impossible for republicans to get
common sense policies and okay. Three more years,
nothing will be passed, and republicans will be
blamed, elections. I mean you can read all
if you want. He's simply saying, well, this
is why we lost to a degree. We
have to stop this now because we'll lose
again.
Well, you just said it was stolen in
a different post. But you see, this is
trying to tap into everybody.
They will lose big for a very long
time. Importantly, it's just, you know, the same
kind of stuff you get. You can read
through if you want. Tri Times August says,
why is he talking like this? Right? Like
like, they're gonna take over. Right?
What's he worried about? I thought there was
a big masterful five d secret game of
chess being played, and he was going to
put them all behind bars. Right? He's clearly
calling it out. He says, what happened to
Gitmo? And and we have everything, and patriots
control in control, and we will it will
all be revealed, and trust the plan, and
keep your enemies close. Are we doing that
anymore?
Why worry about midterm so much? Oh, that's
right. Because it's all BS.
What a perfect thing to frame. He goes,
now we're being buttered up for the second
coming of the the leftist hell, but no
no patience.
What do I mean, we're it's just such
a there's no no denying that if everything
that they were being told was the case,
this wouldn't be where you were.
Mike Johnson
comes out and says Democrats in New York
City have chosen
chosen to a true extremist and Marxist. So
here's the thing. You have part of their
narrative saying they stole it. It's rigged. Go
after that. Other parts of the same team
are saying this is because Democrats like terrorists.
Okay? You see, you can't have both. You
can't argue that there's they stole it using
their secret manipulation.
Right? That would mean the team Democrats.
But then the people, the average Democrats in
the country,
wouldn't then be supported, they wouldn't you couldn't
say that they're supporting terrorism because that mean
they would steal it. The the opposite would
be true. Right? But now they want you
to think that they voted for him, that
means they support terrorism.
They they have their cake and eat it
too. They love to take both sides. This
is just Israel type propaganda.
So they've chosen a true extremist and Marxist,
which, by the way, again, ideology.
There's no crime he's outlining here. So what
he's saying is we don't like those mean
bad ideas, even if maybe they are mean
bad ideas. We don't like them, and so
bad guy. That's not what we pretend this
country is.
And he says, and the consequences will be
felt all across our entire nation.
Because he's in New York,
Mamdani election cements the Democrat party's transformation,
see, to a radical big government socialist party.
So like I keep trying to show you,
they're not going these ones are bad and
this group and the radical Antifa. They're just
like Miller and all of them. They're saying
the whole thing. Every voter, every democrat, they're
all socialist,
radical, terrorist Antifa Marxists. That's what they're doing.
That's,
talk about incitement. This big push they did
about trying and they have a right to
say it all they want, guys. That's free
speech. But if they wanna pretend that saying
Nazi or social is is you're a or
fascist was what it was, that you're a
you know, you're inciting to kill people. I
mean, look at what they're doing. It's this
is just cartoonish.
He says house democrats endorsed Mamdani's dangerous policies,
including
defunding the police, seizing private property, and mass
tax increases. Well, I disagree with
mass seizing private property and mass tax increases,
but is not that that that's your dangerous
radical policies. Defunding the police was a very
big push for half the country. Frankly, I
think we should defund the government. So not
that hard to see it for it's not
it's not a left policy to think that
the government's bad. Do you understand? See this?
They're trying to frame it this way. But
everything else is very, very normal when it
comes to mainstream politics. They're just desperate, guys.
And it says, now every house Democrat incumbent
candidate will co own Muam Dami's disastrous record
in twenty twenty six twenty twenty six midterms.
Right.
So you're telling us that Democrat bad guys
are voting in people they don't like. Isn't
that what you tell us democracy is?
Meanwhile, Republicans are fighting alongside president Trump to
lower costs, which they're not doing, though. Make
streets safer, which they're literally they're I mean,
you could argue that they're less crime, but
they have military marching down the streets, and
that doesn't mean there's no crime. It just
means they're not doing crime while the military
is in the streets. But it says, and
deliver peace through strength. But I weigh on
top of that, it's not even really the
reality if you look at the general statistics.
What you're seeing is certain things changing in
certain cases where they're still there after I
mean, just look for yourself. And I do
this on the show. Look to my past
shows discussing it.
And deliver peace through strength, which is not
happening. Genocide is still happening. Ukraine is still
happening. He's got some fake things he claimed
he put pauses on, which I promise you
won't go away. He's just deceiving you. And
it says and just just like the Biden
and anybody else before, in case I I
always gotta say that for the new people,
he says,
with exactly one year to go until twenty
twenty six elections, the contrast between our parties
has never been more clear.
Divide and conquer. Not for the left the
right, not the the right to conquer everybody,
but for the government and who's controlling it
to conquer the American people. Keep you fighting
yourselves.
Mayor elect Bandani's
extreme agenda is the future of the Democrat
party, but he we will never allow it
to be the future of America.
Right?
Because you're inciting people to go after them
in ways beyond politics is what it certainly
feels like. But that's the same thing the
left does, same thing the right does. They're
pushing us this way. And don't forget, Mike
Johnson's got over a million dollars from the
Israel lobby.
Now,
Madani
does not, as far as I can tell,
from certain things, but there's a lot of
different overlaps. And here's the point to make
before we even get to the end point.
Whether it's Israel lobby or anything else, Soros,
for example,
the way this goes is different today. Right?
You could before it was just you know,
even after first, it was direct. Then it
became the packs and the different kind of
you know, they kinda go together, but then
that became easy to kinda find where it's
coming. The point is today, they go through
side groups. Right? They go through different organizations
like PACS, but now it's been more scattered
to ultimately be able to fund along a
bunch of different groups and then have them
fund to the one person. And so, ultimately,
you can still have one a a foreign
power directly funding a politician. It's not hard
to see. Or Soros, for example, doing the
same thing. But this, the point to recognize
is you can't argue
that Democrats voted them in and that's why
they're all terrorists, at the same time argue
that it was stolen from you,
which both are happening. Here's Clint Russell, somebody
who was very you know, called us black
pill and and purity test before the selection,
now appears to see it. Sure wish they
listened back then. Looks like a clean sweep
for Democrats tonight. He said the
delivering on campaign promises and stop prioritizing foreign
countries, which is pretty much what most Republicans
think right now. I think that's very important
to recognize
because it's the truth. And whether that's why
this happened or not or voting, whatever you
think, it's true that they're prioritizing a foreign
power. Now, this is hilarious to me, showing
you the Israel influence on this, this fake
American Yaacob Yaacobey guy,
who's very much a Zionist Israel blind. His
point is acting against American interests.
He says Hamas is literally
congratulating Mamdani.
Oh, what he means is a Palestinian journalist
who has very clearly been identified. Like, this
is a guy you could easily we've been
highlighting his work for a long time. They
just simply
go, they're all Hamas, and act like they're
stop not trying to accidentally cleanse the entire
area. No. This Israeli journalist who's been doing
this prolifically for a long time now says
congratulations for the free people winning the mayoral
election. I have much more to say, but
congratulations is enough for now. Okay. I don't
see anything about Hamas. I don't see anything
about any of that. RIP New York City?
I mean, these guys are these are lunatics.
The what they're doing right now is insane
to me. Now I don't support any side
of the government, but what they're doing is
trying to convince one part of it that
this is something like, here's what's wild about
it. When we can see Israel doing what
they're doing in this country and most every
American can see it too, they're trying to
flip it on its head and convince you
that this is somehow
Muslims, Qatar, you know, just or I guess
Muslims at large, whatever that means to them,
in
invading and taking over everything.
Even though it's not even remotely what's happening
and you can you know, a a
a an objective look makes that undeniable.
But I'll I'll get to the point about
this in a second.
Ted Cruz.
I showed you this before. This seems like
an easy one. This is before the election.
Just think about this.
He says,
a Democrat. And it says, just a Democrat.
But then this one says, an actual communist
Jihadist.
A literal Karl Marx quoting American hating jihadists.
You know, American hating as he
presents ideas that he argues will better the
country. You could argue he's lying about it,
but see, this is just them trying to
argue that we don't agree with his ideas
and then saying he secretly wants to destroy
everything because so bad ideas. As always, they're
not really what they claim to be. These
people wanna censor you based on concepts, on
free speech, or either on hate speech.
But I said this really does reveal the
game. If in the very midst of their
all Democrats or terrorist push that they're willing
to tell you to vote for a career
Democrat. I mean, he is a hardcore Democrat
operative, guys. One of the most obvious.
But if they tell you to do that
simply because he is calling out Israel,
then it tells you this is really about
Israel.
Now that's just about the surface of a
point, give it all. Right?
Two party illusion.
Terrence Williams
says, impeach and deport.
Oh, deport him now. Okay. He is a
threat to our country, and see this is
what is happening. These are the now whether
Terrence believes this or just gets sees the
writing on the wall and thinks that I
have to scream these contentious things because that's
what the team wants. I don't mean the
team is in all the people. I mean,
the team is in the power structure he's
pandering to every day like a complete clown.
He's a threat to our country, and he
lies on his citizenship paperwork. Okay. Prove it.
I'm not may make a case. Present your
evidence. If that's the case, then do something
about it. The fact that nothing happened shows
you these people are just screaming about a
person they disagree with just like the left,
Terrence. You're just like the left, bud. You
are the left. Rather, the left in the
sense that you call them. The point is
you are a mindless following team sport partisan
that will go after people because of their
ideas. Call for censorship because of ideas. You
know? You're a bro flick. You're the woke
right, guys. That's what this is. Republicans get
to work. Right. Impeach him. Okay. Go for
it. First, maybe impeach any president ever for
all the crimes they continue to commit, whether
it's Biden or Trump. But, realistically,
if you wanna impeach him, go for it.
Make present your case. Show the evidence of
your claims.
The reality is if they had evidence that
he was doing any of these things, this
would have come out a long time ago,
a threat to our country and deport. So
now you're talking about an elected politician
who has citizenship in this country,
who is going to be you're calling for
a deporting him. You see, this is where
we get to the US point, where they're
gonna make an argument for why a US
citizen is not really a US citizen the
moment that they're actually
having wrong ideas.
It's just it's just sad. The people that
are, you know, with American flags and patriots
and all this stuff, and they're the the
least America first people I can see.
Wall Street, ma'am.
After this, he goes, I'm convinced more than
ever that we need Trump to accelerate mass
deportations
no matter what.
Right. No matter what.
He says, I don't care what ICE has
to do to achieve it.
Oh, so you're a complete hypocrite. Right? You're
a complete hypocrite. You're saying you're you're willing
to allow violation of our rights? Yes. I
don't care what is I don't care what
it takes to achieve it. It's worth it.
Okay. So what if Trump has to murder
Americans in the streets? Well, I don't care
what they need to achieve it. Okay. What
if they have to bomb Florida? I don't
care. You know, you could argue that's too
extreme. Right? That's literally what he says. I
don't care what ICE does to achieve it.
These people don't have principles. They're literally showing
you that they don't have principles. They're willing
to do whatever it takes to get their
idea done because because they've been convinced somehow
that it's the best thing for or, I
mean, whatever the narrative is. Some of them
don't care. Some of them believe the nonsense.
At the end of the day, if you're
arguing that we could do whatever we want
to get there, then you're a child in
the room. You're a hypocrite.
And he says, we need as many illegal
aliens to port as we possibly can to
achieve in the next three years. Okay. If
they're illegal aliens, you could deport them anyway.
So the game is do everything around that.
And on top of that, he's pointing to
one person who was already elected
and two new people who were elected who
are Muslims. So you get two new Muslim
politicians,
and the whole thing melts down on the
right in regard to the team sport politics.
Meanwhile, you've got Israel funding at 96%
of the country, or rather whatever. It was
last what was the last quote from,
APAC? 90 something
of every side of all politicians in the
country. 250 of them fly to Israel for
50 states one Israel. I mean and this
is what you worry about, guys? These people
are not on your side, or they're too
lost in their partisan ideas to take a
step back and realize what's happening.
And, of course, when you align with Laura
Loomer, you're not in a good place. She
says, we have a major Islam problem in
America. Just so you're clear, guys, that means
Muslim. She's saying you're not allowed to believe
in Muslim ideology or Muslim religion. You're not.
That's what she means. They just they're they're
trying to make it into something that seems
terroristic.
And that's that's what Islam is, guys. Islam.
The religion of the Muslims. K? So when
she says that, she's just saying Muslims are
bad, which she's not even trying to hide.
In a country that we argue is allowing
a freedom of religion.
I mean, why is nobody even addressing that
in the mainstream conversation? And she says the
GOP, so all of the
mainstream
republican side, refuses to address it because
the entire
party is influenced by Cutter.
I mean, how do you not see that
as desperation?
I think about how stupid this is. Like,
so you could argue Cutter is influencing plenty.
But
first of all, recognize Cutter as an extension
of the Israeli agenda. On top of that,
recognize that you can, if you wanna make
the case, compare it to the Israel lobby,
not just one thing, but all of it,
not just the ones that you argue. Like,
APAC, for example, is not a US entity.
That's part of their
foreign lobbying influence, but there's plenty of them
that aren't even acknowledged.
On top of that, there's plenty of stuff
Israel does that's just straight up overtly illegal
that we don't talk about.
But she's saying that to argue because to
deflect from the obvious, I think. The Islamic
takeover of America is in full swing.
I mean, think of it. Just compare it
for yourself. You ask yourself that question.
New York City, Virginia, Minnesota. Right. Okay. Boom.
So one that was already there. Two new
people got elected, and we're screeching about how
that's a problem for all Muslims over the
entire country.
I don't think Americans understand how dangerous and
violent our country is going to become. Why?
Because two Muslims got elected? Like, this person
is the grossest person on this platform.
I've said that. I'm not being hyperbolic, guys.
She is insanely disgusting and one of the
worst people I've ever had to look at
online. She is telling you that they are
just so gross because they believe
Muslim religion,
that they're gonna cause violence and hurt everybody
and crash planes and just stupid, stupid, lowbrow.
Like, this is not what journalism is.
Top of that, talking about stupid, lowbrow, non
journalism, here's Tim Pool.
This person, Eric Doherty, on the same conversation
goes, it's official. New Yorkers forgot.
What?
Forgot? What? Are you now claiming that Muslims
attacked us on 09/11? Are you that stupid,
Eric? Not even your own party believes that,
man. See, these people are the mainstream
media. That's what they are. That's exactly what
every other mainstream media does. Fox, CNN,
Eric, Nick Sorter, Benny Johnson, Alex Jones, these
are mainstream media. Muslims attack us 09:11. Eric,
I'd love for you to flush that out.
And, of course, he says they forgot because
they elected Mam Madani. Was he on 09/11?
So now any Muslim in the world is
now responsible because you claim they were there?
I mean, worthy of ridicule.
And Tim Pool because he just jumps in
because that's what he does these days. Whether
he believes or not, he waits for those
openings and he does this guy is an
opportunist.
And he goes, no. They were conquered. Oh,
you're so edgy, Tim. You took it a
little further.
Just it's embarrassing. And is Tim arguing Muslim
attacks in 09/11, and now Muslims conquered our
country? I'd love for you to flush it
out in a show, Tim. Why don't you
have Tim Horton on? Talk about it. That'll
not work out well.
Well, here's the thing I think is most
important in all of it.
Until we recognize and acknowledge the two party
illusion, nothing will truly change.
That's my opinion.
Look, over all of we talked about so
far, here's Alex Soros.
So proud to be a New Yorker. American
dream continues. Congratulations, so mom Donnie. Okay. That
doesn't prove
that there's anything going on. But here's the
thing. As you can look into it, I
could start saying the first part about Israel,
which I know is part of it, which
I I'm arguing that I that Israel is
probably finding ways to influence him financially just
like everything else. But if you look into
it, Soros directly does not appear to have
any direct donations to his campaign. But you
can easily show that the the Soros foundations
and different things have very clearly, like I
said, scattered around their funding through multiple administration
or multiple
organizations.
So, yes, he does. But that that's arguably
no different than any other group funding here
and there. I argue, though, that anything like
this does have an effect.
Not that I would say that you just
because of the picture, because of the funding,
that that proves this is happening, but my
opinion is they're all compromised, guys. All these
politicians are working for the mainstream agenda.
He is too.
Now whether he means what he's saying about
Israel or not, that's we'll have to find
out. There's plenty of Jewish people in our
country that very much support him who are
blindly adherent to supporting Israel. So that the
Jewish part is not the main issue. It's
about the fact that they are ardent Zionist
Jews who support Israel and are supporting him.
That doesn't make much sense to me. But
he has been calling it out. He has
been very much calling out Israel, and I
think that's an issue for the mainstream
team sport politics people. But I think at
the end of the day,
this works for the larger ADL Israel Zionism
agenda
because of what people like Loomer are doing.
And maybe that's the whole
point. But like I said,
this guy with his stated policies
wants to grow the government in how it
exists in your life, wants more government involvement,
wants more program. I don't want that. I
want less government in every possible sense in
all of our lives.
So I want you to think about that
when people try to argue that we're somehow
supporting one side of the I I don't
support any of them. I but I also
think that this person
is somebody who is challenging to some degree
what average people see as the as the
partisan game, but what he does
is what matters.
Right? As we see this go forward, let's
wait and see what he does and discuss
it. Don't the idea that we would scream
about his peace thoughts and his feelings and
everything, like Loomer and the rest, they're hyperbolic,
clutching their pearls and screaming about how it's
all gonna come down. Yeah. Maybe.
No different than what Israel's doing right now.
No different than what our current administration is
doing to collapse the country.
Pay attention. Watch what he does. Hold his
feet to the fire, especially if you support
him. But I think that he's tapping into
the same two party game. He is a
Republican or he claims to be. He is
very much tapped into the growing of the
government more. Even when it comes to war,
how much you wanna bet that when it
comes down to it, he will end up
supporting one thing or the other.
Just my opinion. I know I'm jaded. I
know that I am skeptical. I think we
have every right to be.
But I believe where this goes is just
more of the same. Now what David I
pointed out
or Adam says should be much more obvious
now Trump killed MAGA. Now you can argue
it was stolen. Again, elect cheating is obvious.
But like plenty include in the team, especially
in even Trump himself, the argument is that
they lost this for certain reasons.
So if you think of that, then that
would be him essentially killing MAGA with his
aggressive policies for Israel, growing the government, spending
more, basically the opposite of everything they promised,
except all the team players on Twitter are
going, promises made, promises kept. Just think about
how embarrassing that is right now for all
the people that are conservatives
that aren't dumb, that aren't dishonest. They're going,
that's just not true. No, Trump. Grocery prices
are not way down. He just said it
again.
David Icke, it is good that voters rejected
Trump's chaotic tyranny.
But before anyone gets too excited, this is
just another change of the one party state
from right to left, right, left, right, left.
On and on it goes when both parties
are ultimately controlled by the same forces.
It's theater to keep you in the voting
booth, believing it makes any fundamental difference. See,
this is where we really have to get
to.
Even, I mean, even people that see this
get pulled in. That's what I'm talking about
in the t like, the libertarian side of
the people. They were calling certain things out,
and they kinda sucked in the left right
paradigm. People like Luke, for example, the other
day, who acts like they see through it,
but then still goes, we have to do
this in the midterms.
They're either deliberately pretending they're outside of it
to trick you or they think they are,
but are still tapping the left right paradigm.
David like sees it. Right? Plenty of people
out there see. Well, this is where we
need to get to. Even if you disagree
with you know, if you think some of
them are fighting for us, getting yourself to
this mindset is still in your interest.
Because then you are expecting the reality, and
then you're surprised in a positive way by
somebody doing something real.
It says, theater to keep you in the
voting booth.
Hope, hopium is a potent drug and reveals
the ongoing power of the hope over experience.
When people cease to be divided and ruled
and cease to think that their cult tyranny
is better than the other cult tyranny. We
might have a chance of realizing that a
few cannot control billions unless the billions
give their power away to the few.
Politics is the way that they do so.
100%.
You know? So I'm sure, you know, I'm
sure plenty of people might have expected to
jump in and be like, a win for
you know, that's a win against Israel. I
just don't feel that way. I don't feel
like supporting any of these people is gonna
be in your long term interest. But I
will support what I think is their positive
policy. Like, when Gabbard was saying positive things,
I'm good. I like that. But then she
obviously shout went the other direction. Plenty of
them do this. So
I hope for the best, expect the worst
as we all should. But just to wrap
up that one point on this, guys, you
know, I think where this goes,
mom mom Donnie, we'll have to wait and
see what his actions are. But the way
that the team players act around it, like,
what it reveals about the The US dynamic
is it's all everything happening is based on
hyperbolic,
like, cartoonist framing
to kind of, like,
overwhelm the other side or scare people away.
And what's interesting is, again, if you look
at the people who vote, the people that
engage with what I think is an obviously
broken system,
even half of them see it in certain
parts of the time. The point is that
those who are, what, 40 less than 40%
of the country are the people who are
lost within the partisan life. So it's the
people who are the least informed in the
room, it seems, are the ones that are
engaging with this process every time. That's just
that's just how it seems to me. And
so
we are watching this play where they're kind
of my point, I guess, is they're using
the Mamdani types
to get you reinvested, to keep people kind
of distracted from, like, again, hating the other
side. Because you realize his thing is coming
in saying the same kind of thing about
the reverse, about how the right side of
it is basically the other, right, the ones
that are destroying what we're fighting for. And
so it comes down to this ideological divide,
which will be exploited so they can continue
their foreign escapades, so they can continue stealing
your rights away and driving in martial law
and the technocratic future. Now, I hope I'm
wrong, as always.
But what he does will make all the
difference. Right? In the sense of, you know,
we'll be able to see one way or
the other.
Now on this point,
we have Venezuela,
and you might have noticed it's been happening
almost every day.
Daily occurrence now. Casual terrorism from the US
government. Nothing new, which is true.
But as, I think it was Jason Napbassador
rightly points out, the plus side is they're
documenting all their war crimes.
But, again, every day. Now I wanted just
to quickly show you this before we finish
with the FBI point.
This is this is kinda wild to me.
So this is a recent clip that was
put out on the third.
This is, of course, it's so funny.
I it's I people that use this non
ironically cracks me up. It says more winning.
It's just so embarrassing. Apparently, that's them. You
know, it's, like, funny how they're we're winning
because we're doing the good things. Hey. Do
you buy that? It says US military captures
another drug speedboat,
captures,
and seizes over 5,000 pounds of drugs and
apprehends nearly 60 narcoterrorists.
Okay. Well, again, we don't have any evidence.
But here's what's interesting to me. Today, at
the direction of president Trump was it says
a lethal strike was carried out in a
vessel. This was the fourth.
The next day. Right? So this is the
third or, days before.
So so far, we've gotten, what, eight?
And they've all been bombed.
And they say drugs, we have drugs, and
and terrorists, and drugs, and no, we don't
need it's all at the same bottom of
the ocean. Sorry. Okay. And then for whatever
reason,
they actually seize this one and arrest them
all. And what do you know? There's drugs.
You have to think about this for a
second.
Why wouldn't they have bombed it like all
the others?
If you're telling us they've got 5,000
pounds of drugs, why wouldn't they have bombed
it?
I mean, if yeah. If the point is
clear, it's what they've done every other time,
Why did they not do it this time?
Well, my opinion is that they knew they
were drugs, and they wanted to be able
to go see there's drugs,
which would suggest that the others they're bombing
have nothing to do with that. Now, that's
just my opinion. I'd like I would argue,
like I said before, it's most likely that
some of these are doing that. I mean,
it's there is a drug trade that goes
on and they're a part of it, to
be honest, the US government.
But isn't this a strange deviation and the
next day they go right back to bombing
a boat? Well, okay. Then the next day,
why didn't they seize that boat instead of
killing everybody on the boat with and not
leaving any evidence? Now I'm gonna wait to
see if this even fleshes out. They call
it Operation Pacific Viper with any evidence. This
seems to me to be something completely different
than what they're doing with the boats that
they've been bombing.
I think this is a way to try
to pretend that every other one has any
drugs. And even if they the point is
they should be required, which they are, to
prove it every time anyway.
Isn't that just a weird deviation? Now here
is Chad Parather saying the US military snagged
another narco speedboat.
In what? You mean other than bombing all
the other ones? It's like they're trying to
convince you that they've been doing this in
every one of them. Like, there's a game
of trying to
this is the the adherence to the narrative
versus all the facts. It's what people are
doing in politics today.
Whether he even knows that, I don't know.
Not just law enforcement that's giving the bad
guys a one way ticket back to reality.
You mean this one example versus the others
where they bombed everybody? It doesn't make any
sense.
Well, here's what Trump said. As David DeCamp
says, he thinks you're stupid. Every time we
hit a narco trafficking vessel, we they we
save 20,000 lives.
That's what he just said.
Just it's just it's wild what we're doing
right now, guys. What's happening there is illegal.
Everybody, Ron Paul, anybody with any principle is
telling you it's unprecedented. Same with Rand Paul,
by the way. Same with Massey. Same with
all the real people that have America First
principles.
Now speaking of lack of principles, here's Kash
Patel.
War focused peace president, Gaza AI drones, good
stuff to watch in this last show, but
also,
cash Kash's FBI false flag. There's the show
we just did. Now to and this is
just gonna be some updates on where we
are with this story.
First, I wanted to reiterate the things that
came out early, which appears to still be
where we are.
And this well, think about how weird that
is now that it's what? What when this
this was on the thirty first, it's now
the sixth.
A group of people who allegedly chatted online
about an ICE inspired attack went to a
shooting range with AK 40 sevens, no crime
there, practiced high speed reloads, no crime, and
made a reference to pumpkin day.
And that's when they jumped. Okay. That's that's
the framing star. What you'll see is that
everything we're talking about outside of the allegations
of ISIS connections and and planning an attack,
which has yet to flush out, everything in
this is are legal actions
that only seem weird when you look at
it through the lens of ISIS terrorism attack.
An FBI undercover person was introduced into the
chat room in early stages.
Every single time FBI get involved,
organize, engineer, even fund and drive and provide
the materials for an event,
and then try to stop them. In some
cases, they don't do it, and they charge
them with planning the attack that they literally
orchestrated.
This is not I brought this up in
the last show.
In fact, it's right here. No. It's the
old ones. Here. I had it earlier, I
think, but I'll grab it just in case.
Because the point is I want you to
watch this show and understand how prevalent that
is. And I'll even just grab this one.
This will probably pop up. Yeah. Right here.
Intercept article. Why does the FBI have to
manufacture its own plots if terrorism and ISIS
are such grave threats?
Glenn Greenwald. I'll include that one. The last
show though, we did quite a few we
went over I mean, I had, like, seven
different examples from our site, from other sites.
Oops. That's the wrong one. Here's the last
show. Oh, I'm I'm stupid. I literally just
closed it. It's it's in the show notes.
That's the show right there.
So when they have someone in the chat,
you have to understand this is what they
do. They've been doing this. I mean, the
New York the New York Times has wrote
about this a while ago. The participant discussed
whether to carry out an ICE inspired plot.
Now what that looks like will change everything.
Right? So, hypothetically, if it's going, let's go
to some let's go to that parade on
pumpkin day and and have a great time,
and they're like, wink, wink. We know what
that language means. You know, whatever that comes
out, that's what they tend to do.
If it's let's go do something like that
ISIS video we saw, well, that would change
the conversation, wouldn't it? I doubt that's the
case. The point is they've yet to release
anything like that. Like, remember with Tyler Robinson
and the rest when they released the information?
We we tear through it, and we go,
look. Look at the even the chat doesn't
line up with what they're saying. On top
of that, you can't even verify these chats
came from where they claimed they did. So
what do they do now? They just go
narrative. Shut up.
That's what Trump does. That's what seems like
cash is doing so far anyway.
Okay.
Oh, and then this last part,
the participants discussed where they carried a plot
and it says, quote, through,
though, what that plot was,
when that plot would be, what the target
would be was unclear
as they discussed various options.
So, you didn't know what the plot was.
Right? You didn't know when it would be.
You didn't even know what the target would
be. But somehow, you think there's a plot?
How does that even make sense? Well, if
something comes out that at lines it all
up, then we'll point it out. Right now,
it seems to be yet another manufactured event
with very little evidence. Now, don't forget, their
lawyer came out, which they might, but they
commonly do and said, look, there's no evidence
this is crazy.
I tend to agree, but we'll have to
wait and see.
This went around before we get into the
final, you know, cover, covering of where it
is now. And, funny enough, I was just
talking about this.
I I didn't share I did what I
was talking about and retweeted it instead of
using the link,
and now it's gone. It says but it
says post unavailable.
It does appear it was deleted, but I
just wanna make that point. Reminder, myself included,
try not to do the retweet, try to
grab the link and use it because overall,
if they this thing kinda thing happens, you
can't you there's the link's gone.
There's no evidence, like even I couldn't even
grab the link and then try to use
the Wayback Machine because they won't give you
it. It deletes it. Right? But I said,
b below
is is how stupid they think we are.
Here's what it was. Thank you to Orwell
for saving this.
Sarah says, ISIS is threatened in New York
City today. If you still think appeasing terrorists
will make them stop, you clearly haven't gotten
the memo. This is all pushed to get
you to go against Ma'am Dani, or at
least from the Twitter side of it. Right?
To go, he's terror. Here's bad guy. So
Operation Manhattan Project. Yeah. Because, you know, the
ISIS public you know, PR group put out
their public relations post. It's just so stupid.
Remember, we're we're gonna get into this right
now. Right? The reality of where ISIS comes
from. But guess what? It was fake. Surprise,
surprise. And it got deleted. It got fact
checked and deleted because that's what they do.
That was what got deleted. But here is
all the usual suspects screaming about it because
they don't check anything. Because they go, oh,
that aligns with what I wanna say. Blast
it out. We just talked about that. That's
what they do. She says, the Muslims can't
think of a better way for the Muslims
to celebrate the victory of a Muslim mayoral
candidate today than by committing an ISIS attack.
This is what we pretend. This is what
the team sport, the mainstream alternative media. The
new media, pretends a journalist is today. Right?
Somebody who
the Muslims can't think of a better Muslim
way than Muslim. You know, it's just she's
crazy. On top of that, it's all false.
So she takes a fake thing that isn't
actually happening and screams her hatred for Muslims
without any due diligence. You know what that
means? She hates people for no reason. That's
what that means.
Here is Sean Ryan show, the the CIA
show. Right? And he goes, FYI,
the link that's gone. And now he actually
shared it, so you can see that that's
I can't include that actually. Here's the deleted
link in case that matters for you.
But that was the one I showed you
earlier.
And see, I was like, fake news. They
don't care. They they they share it because
it aligns with their ideals. That's what they
do.
And look. Good on Kimberly for calling this
out.
Oh, yeah. Let me see if that'll come
back to it.
But here is some of the stuff I
want you to remember, guys. So what are
they saying? An ISIS linked plot. Right? Okay.
Well, the first part should be to recognize
that ISIS is a group that Israel and
United States have literally created and ran and
and armed and moved around. I could give
you a six hour show of all the
evidence. In fact, I'll just reference like I
usually do, James Corbett's amazing work, False Flags,
The Secret History of Al Qaeda.
It's very good. I'll include our watch through
of all three parts with Corbett, myself, and
Brock West. But, I mean, the reality is
this is if you watch this and literally
watch and pay attention and look at the
source material, which is provided for every single
claim,
there's no denying this, guys. This is an
undeniable reality. Ben Swan did a documentary about
the about the ISIS part of it, which
Al Qaeda just morphed into ISIS like I
played the clip.
But this is Israel US manufacturing.
So
when you have the overtaking of Syria and
you see ISIS members working on behalf of
The US and Israel in Syria, like you
can see the picture of, which you can
verify with the reverse,
reverse image, like TinEye, for example. That was
in Syria. They were the ones working for
Israel and United States. The other one is
an is ISIS member executing Alawites, I believe.
And you can prove this. Now you can
see Israel working with Jalani, same with The
United States. Here's an example of ISIS linked
groups.
Here, I'll grab this too. That one's a
good one to bring to include.
Where Israel says, hey. What's wrong with that?
We can we can work with ISIS because
that's working with our agenda. Yeah. That's what
they do. This is Haraz.
What's wrong with that? How Israel trains an
armed and anti and ISIS linked Gaza
militia.
It's not a secret, guys. They just nobody
talks about it within the controlled US
conversation. So the point is they're working with
ISIS groups in or even ISIS linked groups
just like they're saying ISIS linked plot in
Gaza, and they know they're doing that.
Think about how stupid this is with them
now saying this is I'm not saying that
they like, because they work with them, it
shouldn't matter. There's someone else doing a bad
thing. My point is to show you that
this is something they are doing.
Whether or not this is even the case
with the people from Dearborn, Michigan.
And here's Ron Paul calling out Trump for,
like, the third time on this conversation.
The insanity, he says, of US foreign policy
in a nutshell that self styled Syrian president
al Shara or Jilani
is it is to be welcomed by the
White House. Here's Trump shaking his hand. That
is the leader of an Al Qaeda group.
Just before or his US aid rise to
power in Syria last year, he was the
head of the local Al Qaeda branch.
This is Ron Paul, the one they pretended
they were gonna work with because they tried
to trick all of you to support Trump.
Before that, Al Sheerah worked with Al Qaeda
in Iraq and is responsible for the death
of numerous
US service members, America first.
That's your reality right there, guys.
Oh, and don't forget, just for humorous overlap,
six times Trump claims he defeated ISIS.
But now we're fighting back an ISIS plot
because it all makes sense. Right? This chapter
shows that despite Trump's claims to the contrary,
he did not entirely defeat ISIS.
The stupidity of the world we're in today
that you have to do an Oxford study
to prove that he's lying about something that
didn't happen.
Man, the world is broken today. But
here is where Pam Bondi is.
Our newly unsealed complaint reveals
unsealed complaint. Okay. We're not dealing with an
indictment despite all the stupidity online. Blind assumption.
It is a criminal complaint, which makes a
huge difference. And I'm not saying that because
she wrote that. I'm saying you can prove
it. The newly unsealed complaint reveals a major
ISIS link terror plot. Well, no. All it
does is literally state what you believe. There's
no evidence. It's quotes from Twitter for crying
out loud. I'll show it to you. And
it says in Michigan, of course, that's clearly
an agenda they're building. According to the complaint,
subjects had multiple rifles, not a crime. Tactical
gear, not a crime. And a detailed plan
to carry an attack on American soil. Well,
I've yet that's yet to be revealed. You
guys have any you haven't even fleshed out
what that is. You said in the first
statement, you don't even know where, when, or
how. So how exactly can they have a
detailed plan?
Thanks to the extraordinary diligence of our US
attorney,
FBI's, local enforcement, this plot was stopped before
it well, we lost lives,
or they didn't do that at all. Our
American heroes prevented a terror attack. Here's what's
weird. Here's the link she shares.
Oops. It's gone. You know, see, there's one
or two things I think about this. Either
they're deliberately putting out links they change, so
then when you, like, ask Rock, for example,
it can't find a link, which happens often,
or they edit it and changed it because
they're ridiculous and constantly lying to everybody. Either
way, her major post that's cited by all
these platforms for the evidence of this claim
links to a dead page.
That's where we are today.
So here is Grok. Has the FBI indicted
anyone for the events of October 31 and
the claimed ISIS linked
plan.
Croc says, yes. The FBI has indicted individuals.
Here's the information.
Okay?
See, this is why it's important to know
what you're talking about, not blindly take Croc
at face value. So read through it. Okay.
Everything they list are things that they're stating
without think nothing's been proven. Nothing. Because they're
only stating things, and I'll I'll make this
case very clear for you. They're going, this
happened, this happened, this happened. And then Crock
and others point to that statement as the
proof that it's happening. Typical. Right?
Well, I said, well, give me a link
to the official press release. I'd like to
see the indictment.
Okay. Link here. And I said, well, that
that's a criminal complaint, not an indictment. It
is. And I'll show you again in a
second. Oh, whoops. Yes. Oh, I'm sorry, Ryan.
You're correct. The criminal complaint is not the
same as an indictment. In federal cases like
this, a complaint is an initial charging document
filed by prosecutors often with an arrest warrant
to initiate proceedings,
not an indictment.
Right? If they haven't even this requires a
jury to look over the evidence. The point
is this is just the beginning. They're charging
them their their their criminal complaint with charges.
There's no pleas because there's not even a
federal as far as I understand it, there's
no plea necessary because it's a federal level
and it's a complaint charge. It's still a
complaint as criminal complaint. It still has to
go further in the investigation for them to
then indict, and then that will happen.
See how interesting this is? But so the
point is, yes, it is a criminal complaint,
and, no, that it's not an indictment. That
changes everything. But even that is what's being
said by Grock. So here, on the third,
multiple suspects charged for having firearms and conspiracy
to provide material support to ISIS. Well, the
even that statement changes the overall point. Oh,
so you're not in a plot to attack.
Your argument is you were
conspiracy
to support
an attack.
Okay. Well, at least the first two suspects.
This is where I think just like the
Dallas point where it ended up being people
that did or they claim they had no
idea what's going on. A third person that
they don't have any connection to was there
and shot somebody, and they claimed that's their
group and their organization. And they're going, I
don't we didn't even be the part of
that. We didn't know what's happening. Seems like
a CIA Mossad element stepping in and executing
somebody and then blaming the group, which seems
to how this tends to work these days.
Just a possibility. In this case,
what if this was something that was executed
by somebody else who was not part of
the group, was in the chat room, and
or rather the plan, and, ultimately, these guys
had no idea about it. And all of
the plot is about one guy saying one
thing. And this is we have yet to
find out. You know? When this actually comes
to pass and they do release evidence, we'll
be able to dive through
it. But it says, last Friday, the FBI
arrested multiple suspects and took them into custody.
They have now been charged for having firearms
that would be used in a conspiracy. So
guess what about firearms? That's it. It's about
the use of firearms and whether those will
be used with some kind of an act.
Not about a terrorist attack, not about a
plot with ISIS. It's about firearms.
They're including the support for ISIS to make
this a bigger case. It says the complaint
sets forth grievous allegations of a radical Islamic
terror plot involving air style rifles, shotguns, handguns,
and other tools for tactical assault.
The complaint.
This newly unsealed complaint so here they are
quoting what they this is what she wrote
on Twitter.
That's what I just read to you. So
now they're in the practice of in their
official
documents from the attorney's office
using the quote from Twitter as I mean,
this is embarrassing.
This is embarrassing. Lack of decorum, lack of
process, these guys don't even know what's supposed
to happen, it feels like. You can't point
to your Twitter statement as the evidence to
make the claim. That's where sir that circle
that's redundant. It doesn't make any sense.
But it goes on to say, I read
it for you already. According to the complaint,
they had multiple air rifles and so on.
Now it says with today's unsealed criminal complaint,
criminal complaint, the American people can see the
result of months of tireless investigative work. No.
We can't. You just go they did bad
things and plot, and we knew it. That
doesn't prove anything. We don't see any investigative
work. There's no process.
And it says, we are thankful for the
exceptional work of the FBI. Okay. That's all
you get, guys. You get a tweet she
put out. You get their statements about it,
and then that's it. The investigation's ongoing. A
criminal complaint, it says right here, is merely
an allegation,
and all defendants are presumed innocent until proving
it. Yeah. Not in the Republican game, though.
Tyler Robinson's been guilty since they caught that
old guy first.
That's how it works. Well, here's the other
one, which is weird because it came from
office of public affairs, which says the exact
same title and does the exact same thing.
A little bit longer, but just wanna point
out,
last Friday, they arrested them. Her tweet post,
with today's unsealed I guess it's the same
length exactly, actually. That's all it is. Same
exact post. There's nothing other than their statements.
That's it. Okay?
Third suspect arrested and charged along with two
current defendants for conspiring
to provide material support. See, not providing support,
but talking about maybe providing support for something
that didn't even happen. If that's actually so
to me, that's going to be subjective. They're
gonna have something they claim is what was
about to happen based on the word they
were using. There's no way around it. And
having firearms that would be used to commit
the act. Yes. You have guns. You're allowed
to because that's not a crime in this
country to own a gun, but it is
when they claim you're a terrorist.
So same point. Today, the FBI arrested a
third person, and then their quotes, and that's
it.
These aren't changing anything. This is them stating
things. Okay. Politico.
Justice department files charges against two men accused
of plotting ISIS linked Halloween attacks. This is
on the third. Department of justice has filed
charges against two people from Michigan for alleged
ISIS linked terror plot that investigators say the
group of men plan to carry out over
Halloween.
And we listed their names before. It was
Ali and Amal with last names face they
face charges of receiving and transferring
and attempting to conspire to transfer firearms and
ammunition
knowing and having reasonable cause to believe the
firearms and ammunition will be used to commit
a federal crime. Oh my god. So what
you're saying is
receiving, which what? Buying guns? Okay. That's not
a crime in this country. I'm sure your
team will love that. Transferring, which didn't happen,
you understand? Because they didn't transfer them. They
were their guns that they were using. They
claimed they were about to. And it says,
and attempting to conspire to transfer. So if
it didn't even happen, you haven't transferred them,
where does that first part come in? And
it says, knowing it then having a reasonable
cause to believe that they might be used
to commit a fire a crime.
And this is the big terror plot they
shut down.
The attorney general
Pam Bondi said is the work of American
heroes.
The complaint states that agents were monitoring at
least one co conspirator as of last summer.
Okay. I think this is where it probably
comes to play. Who is this one lone
co conspirator that they were watching before these
other guys in the chat room? Or otherwise,
you could think of it as cultivating this
guy first.
Okay? So he's the one that they bring
in who ultimately ends up doing it that
they blame these other guys for, and they're
the two that they really go after from
Devereux, Michigan as Muslims.
So what it feels like to me is
that they're cryptic communications. Now I'm running short
on time. I'm simply just gonna point out,
guys, if you read through this, they have
guns. They have tactical backpacks,
ammunition. I mean, look. If you go look
at anybody, like, my my any anybody, guys,
The idea of people, for example, stocking up
on a bunch of ammunition. Like, you can
think that sounds crazy,
but everybody was doing that. During the pandemic,
if you went to go try to buy
rounds at a place, they were everything was
out. Everything was wildly expensive because people were
stocking up.
That's the way it works. It's not a
crime. There's regardless of what they wanna make
it into. Now it could those things could
mean something else,
but it also could just mean people who
have I have a tactical vest. I have
all sorts of stuff, guys. It doesn't mean
you're a criminal,
but that's where they're building this into. Now
the next one is from the fifth
from Detroit Free Press. Latest terror suspect linked
to video game lawsuit
over stolen loot. It says three more men
have been arrested and alleged in this Halloween
terrorism plot. This is sprawling into more people.
I'm not sure how this connects just yet
because they haven't released anything.
It says, and including a Dearborn man who
was being sued by makers of popular video
game, Fortnite.
The main point for me to get to
it
so they're saying they have nothing to do
with any of this. Like, they're not the
people aren't even connected.
So unless there unless there's evidence, that seems
like they're just picking out a different Muslim
guy from Dearborn and saying that they were
doing a hard to know because they're not
releasing any information. It says, miss Nasir mister
Nasir does not have any involvement to the
recent investigation and complaint that came through pertaining
to the alleged terrorism plot. He has no
involvement in the case. No. Lawyer could lie.
It says he was basically held that the
accused have merely video gamers who talk tough
online, had no plan intention to attack, which
makes sense to me. Happens all the time.
These guys are blusters.
People online, especially gamers,
you know, podcasters, guys, people do it all
the time. Meanwhile and that's why words are
words. Crimes are crimes. Right? That's free speech.
Meanwhile, two more men are reportedly arrested in
New Jersey for alleged ties to a Michigan
terror case. Ties to a case that didn't
even happen. Right? So now you have a
case that you claim was a terror case.
Now you're finding connections to that abstract parts
of the case. So here's a guy who
sold them ammunition. Now you're part of the
case. We haven't even verified that this thing
even happened or was even going to happen.
Again, history shows how long the FBI, how
many times they've been caught trying to manufacture
a case.
But here
where was it?
I have one more thought. Oh, I'm gonna
keep going for time.
It says according to NBC News, 19 year
old from New Jersey was arrested.
Oh, it's the next one. I was gonna
make I get I'm trying to hurry, but
I'll make one point.
They're saying that they plan to work with
ISIS and stuff. I mean, again, to find
what how what proves that. Right? Are if
you're gonna say they said that, then show
us where it says that and then prove
that you got it from that chat room.
Other than that, I don't trust the FBI.
New Jersey and the Dearborn man landed an
FBI radar following a year long investigation involving
an undercover FBI informant.
Weird. Because it's not like that ever happens
every single time no matter what. And I'm
not saying it's wrong for people to investigate,
but the point is every time you find
this early involvement where they're the ones that
provided the materials and had the idea and
tried to push them to it. I'm not
even making that up. And they say simply
because they were willing to do it at
the end of all of that that they're
the ones. And half the time, people are
just blustering, like we said, going, yeah, let's
do it. Then they're behind the scenes going,
yeah, that guy's crazy. And they get arrested
for it. But here, three men charged in
connection with Halloween terror plot.
The point for me,
according to available records, with the per the
the one of the people's father they arrested
appears to be Roger Sedrat, an award winning
Iranian American poet. He did not immediately respond
to comment. To me, I feel like that's
relevant. The idea that they found some weird
connection backwardly to Iran. I mean, this is
what somebody like Kash Patel seems that seems
like what he would do.
Alright. Just trying to wrap it up. I
do have to get going. I'll have you
come back to that next one.
Overall, guys, we're at a point now where
there's basically nothing to back this up other
than what they're claiming. It feels to me
to get more flimsy as they arrest more
people. And I was I was in the
mind that they weren't even gonna charge them
because it didn't seem like there was much
to go on, but they did.
But we'll have to wait and see how
it fleshes out like any other story. But
where we're at right now, with everything going
on in the world, with how little they're
giving you, very skeptical. And I mean, in
everything in me is telling me there's something
to go wrong here, but, hey, we've been
wrong before in the past. That's why we
wait for the facts to flesh out before
we come to our conclusion.
But we can look at what the evidence
suggests. And right now, with what they've already
been caught doing, I'm very much of the
mind that this feels wrong. That where it's
going is in the interest of creating the
narrative that
Dearborn or any in the
infiltration problem while we're watching where that problem
really lies, where it really is growing, where
it continues to proliferate.
So thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I'll leave you with a couple of points
here on the way out.
Pam Bondi, during the Arctic Frost investigation, we
found that special counsel seized president Trump's government
issued phone. This means Biden administration
turned over Trump's phone. We can never be
allowed this to let the government weaponize this
again. Basically saying, I submitted these new documents
to expose them. Okay. And I said, so
when is the is someone going to be
arrested for all these social media announced crimes?
So far, the number is zero, Pam Bondi.
Guess what? Probably never, despite the fact that
they should be arrested for the crimes they
committed. I'm simply saying that even though they've
got evidence, they're not going to most likely
because they never have, and that they're on
the same side.
He said to the news, a DC journey
as a a jury has acquitted Sean Dunn,
who threw a subway footlong at the CPB
agents. Right? So they're going after all the
big crimes. No. They're going after sandwich throwers.
And even that gets acquitted because they have
nothing. The point is, actual quotes from the
courtroom. This case, ladies and gentlemen, is about
a sandwich.
A sandwich that landed intact still in a
subway wrapping.
If you could smell the onions and the
mustard,
we are a joke. And they are in
I mean, I don't even think they're intentionally
doing so, but they are making fun of
you. And they are driving us in a
place that makes the world is making fun
of.
Five times August to finish simply says, what
happened to the whole drain the swamp thing?
Right?
I mean, did we just forget about that?
Like, we're I mean,
Bill Gates,
BlackRock.
No. He is the swamp, guys. And if
you've been paying attention, you already knew that.
No more than Biden. Same thing.
Hopefully, people could pay attention to this. Do
something about it because we are being manipulated.
They want you to start. And look, if
you care more about what's going on with
Muslims infiltrating the country, even though I think
that's obviously not what's really going on,
look at everything. Stand back and look at
the big picture. Like my point is, if
you were worried about China influencing policy, why
wouldn't you be equally concerned about Israel? I
care about both. There's far more evidence for
one of them. I simply hope you'll take
the time to look. If you're honest and
you care, it's there for you. Everything's sourced
down below.
Thank you for being here tonight. I appreciate
your support. If you continue to support this
platform and you believe in what we're doing,
show us what it's worth to you because
we can't keep doing this without your support.
Now, again, tomorrow, we're gonna be putting out
the IMA panel. I've got some more coming
out in general, some more articles coming. Derek
has a good article that will probably be
out tomorrow, but stay tuned. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.