It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 10/28/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Bit of a gap in in the last
so many couple weeks or maybe week and
a half of of content
in on, you know, largely the last American
bag of or excuse me, the the the
daily wrap up. And it's something that I've
been kind of toiling with. I I had
a a deep, you know, I don't know,
twenty minute conversation about this with,
Steve and slow news or excuse me. And
I wake up this morning. And, you know,
I don't really wanna get into it too
in-depth today because I feel like I just
wanna get right into some important get you
know, kinda get caught back up on some
stuff that we wanna talk about. But part
of it is something that I know you
all experience
that we've talked about here and there, and
I do have a part that I'll make
I'll make a point of it to start
today. But something that I really find that
I'm grappling with, the the the the the
it's really the cut to the chase of
it, the balance
between
what I still argue is important to highlight
some of the really deceptive factors out there
and, you know, just basic reporting of factual
coverage of what's happening.
You know, and there's plenty of other factors
to include, but, you know, the balance between
those things. Because I see one very much
affects the other. And if and and the
and the the the difficult part for me
is how much importance it even needs to
be given.
There I see people in my immediate circle,
close people close to me that I know
are good people, that at least
in my perspective are are misguided or lost
or are of the mind that they need
need to do the wrong thing for for
the right you know, you know, in this
moment
for the right reasons because, you know, a
narrative like, destroying the constitution to save the
constitution.
And in any other case, had it been
any other president, maybe even anybody other than
Trump, I know what they would have said
before. So it makes me feel like that
there are good people out there who are
just lost in this. That that's why that
coverage would be important for me to reach
the people that need it more than anybody,
to see just a factual presentation of things
to go, oh, okay. I you know? That
that's what I grapple with. My point is
that I've been really struggling with
feeling like I'm getting pulled into the things
that I feel like are meant to be
distractionary.
But sometimes my job is to wade into
those things knowing that's the case to try
to break it down for people that, you
know, don't have the time or maybe want
my perspective on it.
And it's just long story short, it's it's
it's difficult, and I think it's by design.
I think there are parts of this whole
thing right now that are meant to to
pull you away from what's most important. We'll
talk about Venezuela today, something we mentioned on
the show today. I mean, it's not that
far fetched with what with how obvious it
is. The most obvious issue this country is
dealing with right now, and I guarantee you
all right now have a very particular thing
in mind that is taking place in this
country that I think is it is monumental.
It's it's paramount.
And it's not too farfetched to argue that
if we're dealing with a foreign power that
has completely taken control of this country, this
government rather, it wouldn't be too crazy to
say go and commit blatant war crimes in
the most obvious degree when you could do
it in a way that wouldn't be that
obvious in order to deflect from what we're
all doing right now? This is just a
thought that shouldn't even be that crazy to
consider.
My point, though, is to think about how
some of this stuff is meant to pull
you away from what should be focused on,
how some of it is meant to
flood the zone as we make a point
about the start. But, anyway, just to kinda
throw it out there and into you know,
we're all we're all going through this. Right?
We this everybody out there, ourselves included, people
doing these shows, we're all grappling with whatever
the hell is happening right now. So, it
becomes a difficult thing to try to you
know, I guess, where where I come from
is is the responsibility
I feel that I have in order to
make sure I do this in a way
that is not just getting up and just
kind of dumping out what I see,
but really measured thought about what it is
that I'm relaying to you, what I think
we're staring at, how I think it matters.
Because if I'm just reflexively going into it
all, if I'm not thinking these things through,
I feel like in many ways that could
add to the problem. At least that's what
weighs on me. So think about all that.
And and one one last thing to to
add on to it was that I'm try
I I might be considering different ways
to evolve what we're doing. This, for me,
I don't think is ever going to stop.
I mean, I'll say right now, it will
never stop, but futures can change things. My
point is that this daily wrap up, the
what I do, the covering this stuff, whether
it's ever never
gets no reach, whether nobody cares to see
it, I'm gonna do it because it's important,
I think, for me even to just cover
these things. But whether that might be more
interviews, whether that might be, you know, other
things that I do have coming very shortly
that we'll be discussing soon enough that might
take more time, more IMA panels, more any
number of other things we could be doing.
So let me know what you think about
that and and what you may want more
of, you know, and it will help me
decide.
But let's let's get
into today.
Now we've talked about a lot of Venezuela,
obviously, Israel, Gaza. One major part today that
I wanna make sure people see, which we'll
be getting into more over the week, is
that the West Bank has become a a
I mean, it's not
outside the reality to call it a genocide.
Because if you understand what it really is
and what this is aimed at, the Palestinian
people, and understand what the West Bank actually
is,
occupied Palestine. And especially when you could just
look and see that the same thing that's
been done in Gaza is slowly, I mean,
slowly in the sense of the ongoing year
and a half genocide,
expanding into the West Bank and has been
doing so for a long time before that.
And, even well back before with Trump's first
administration, even before that, the weird quasi it's
not inconsistent with international law to literally break
the law in the West Bank. And then
Biden's administration comes in and goes, well, it's
not legal, but we're totally not gonna care
when they do it. And then Trump comes
back in this administration and lays out the
reality as if he didn't say in the
first place through Pompeo that it wasn't inconsistent,
that we won't let it happen,
even though it was already happening,
even though he knew that because he allowed
them to do so, and that was one
of the agreements with Marianne Adelson, one of
the agreements with Netanyahu in regard to violating
the second phase of the last ceasefire.
Yet he comes out and goes, we won't
allow it. Does it again recently. Jordan said,
we this line is crossed with the West
Bank. No. Nope. Not a peep. Has been
going on the entire time. Now today, we're
gonna get into the rapid escalation of that
and how they are still acting like we're
not going to allow this. That overlaps with
the flood the zone nonsense side of it.
But we're gonna talk about what's happening in
Gaza as well and the continuation of that,
the reiteration of bombing, which is really not
the right way to frame it. Israel has
been bombing the entire time through every ceasefire
I could point to. This one in particular
has been kidnapping Palestinians, has been restricting aid,
has been violating everything with the yellow line.
I mean, just nonstop violations. Hundreds of them
if you if you look to independent media
or rather even just international,
institutions like the UN or human rights groups
that are telling you exactly that. So they've
been violating it the entire time. Today, we're
seeing the the
public reiteration or rather reinitiation
of bombing in Gaza, even though it was
already happening under the claim that Hamas violated
the ceasefire, which I actually can't even find.
I in regard to whether it's happening, of
course, it's possible. Hamas could violate it like
anybody else could and has in the past.
The point is that right now, I don't
think it's actually happening. I think the claim
goes back in which they'll argue, look at
them pretending to not find the bodies that
we buried under rubble is the craziest argument.
And they're literally pretending like Gaza is now
extending it out by not finding the bodies,
and it's expanding
it's pushing their their rationale that they're the
ones that broke something, so we're gonna go
right back to doing what we claimed was
only aimed at Hamas, but we're carpet bombing
the area. It's it's it's frustrating.
As well as Venezuela, which we'll talk about,
which is its own thing, but very much
is a continuation of long sought plans.
And Israel is playing a part in this
even if it's just the reality of what
is, you know, the part of the the
globalist agenda that they're all involved in or
even just
resources.
But what it is is illegal, and it's
shocking to see how brazen it is right
in your face and how long it's been
happening. And it's not a partisan conversation, and
it has nothing to do with drugs. It's
just infuriating for those that have been covering
this for a very long time to see
the nonsensical
arguments that flood this conversation with million. And
we talked about this this morning as well,
and, hey, wake up in in in regard
to TLAD
Tuesday. In regard to the weirdness that we
saw this rapid growth through this false kind
of algorithmically controlled platform to create these million
follower, just talking ahead people that are some
of the dumbest people in the room. At
the very least, the most willing to just
repeat whatever the team says. It's wild, but
yet that is in in it deafens everybody.
The conversation when they push out their thing
and all their million person follower accounts screen
the same thing, and then they all trickle
out. They're all their followings, and it just
waters down everything by design, quite obviously.
And so that is a very difficult thing
to overcome, but the point is that that
is major.
It's been going on a very long time,
and what we're dealing with today is kind
of like the rational extension to where we
always predicted this would go. Right? People are
getting more extreme. People are getting more partisan,
more irrational, more and I don't mean the
majority, by the way, but just what they're
shoving in front of you.
So we I had some good interviews, some
good articles we're gonna cover today, but I
wanna start with the two party illusion part
of all this and, really, the whole flood
the zone point I was making and give
you the examples of what I'm talking about,
but to and explain kind of why I'm
seeing
why this is difficult moment for what this
is and the kind of the propaganda around
it all and how it's hard to make
that balance.
First of shout out to Derek's recent article.
He part three will be coming out very
soon.
And this the the general series, which I
made a page for, for those of you,
looking at the the
on the
watching the video. First of all, I can't
seem to talk today. Not the podcast. You
guys, you can see the head the menu
bar here under TLav team, under Derrick Bros,
you'll now find right at the top the
technocratic Trump administration.
And some of these are pages made for
the series, like with Whitney Webb. Some of
them are just individual pages on, like, the
tag, but there'll be a new page a
new article under this page coming up, I
think, in the next couple of days. Derek's
working on it now. The technocratic Trump administration,
this one entitled pressuring and consolidating the media.
Very important read. And I think what this
is is not left or right. It's about
the reality of where this government has always
been going, and it's not trying to defend
the left media as so many people try
to respond to this. It's about the reality
that even corporate media, left or right, is
not every single thing they say always lying
to you. As I think Caitlin Johnstone in
the past had said, you know, when they
tell you it's gonna rain, might wanna grab
an umbrella, right? Even then, you don't know.
But the point is not everything everywhere is
always wrong or dishonest or a lie. Most
some of the most important deceptions, if not,
I would argue historically always, the most important
lie is buried in 99% truth. That's
always, in my opinion, how the real deceptions
work. Sometimes there's just clumsy things that get
yelled out that are lies that are and
maybe that's part of flooding the zone to
get you distracted by calling out the thing
we all know is a lie, which I
do myself as well. But the real picture
is that this is, you know, beyond partisanship.
And I'll make some points as we go
through it today.
But watch out for number three because this
is, I think, a culmination of an important
series. Now as I made the point just
to start.
You might have heard this topic, this this,
the, you know, Reagan and and tariffs and
AI and, you know, which, again, I'm not
gonna under
being dishonest, especially from the president perspective or
the level of a president or just people
in positions of power, that's not insignificant.
Like, I make the point about, Candace Owens
really going after the French president's wife or
husband or whatever you wanna think about it.
Like, I'm not gonna deny the weirdness around
all that or or Michelle Obama for that
matter. There's very, very real reasons to ask
these questions. Now maybe you think it's proven,
maybe it is. For me, I don't even
see why it's as important as people make
it out to be. It's a lie that
I would agree with. My point is that
that's relevant to go look. They're being dishonest
with you. But it's it's more than that
for the partisan game. It's somehow like a
secret insight into their weird woke left kind
of push to secretly make you support gay
men. It doesn't even really line up for
me when you understand that the woke left
or right dynamic is just a policy means
to an end. If you think for one
second that they actually cared whether or not
you used woke pronouns and that's what they
were really fighting for, you're missing the entire
picture. It's just like Trump right now doesn't
actually care about 90% of the things he's
screaming about. It's about trying to achieve the
end. And by the way, why with USAID?
They're still spreading,
circumcision pushes in Africa and HIV present you
know, that's all still happening. Even climate change
pushes. I show I've shown this six different
times from The USA spending website.
The point is not that they care about
those agendas, but that just happens to be
a workable narrative in the places they need
to do those things. And so in this
case, the point is that you can clearly
see that there's,
well, what was I saying? I lost the,
thread on the Reagan part.
Anyway, the larger point was simply that they,
you know, use misinformation
constantly to flood the zone, and I was
making a point that connected to something there.
I just lost it. But Penny Johnson put
it out. They said they cheated on a
commercial.
Ronald Reagan loved tariffs. Trump's saying this. And
they said they didn't. And I guess it
was AI or something, which, again, the point
is whether or not it was the case
well, I guess the larger point I was
making to start was just that being dishonest
does matter. Oh, that's right. It was the
the the woman I went off on a
tangent. The point, though, is that the the
lie matters, whether it's about the the woman
being a man or whatever else.
But it's not but but that they lie
is not a profound point, is it? Whether
it's about what they said yesterday, what their
agenda is, or about who they're with or
whatever else. It comes down to being dishonest,
which matters. But does it matter in the
sense of what we're dealing with today? So
if Trump comes out and goes, that thing's
red when it's actually blue, it's important to
go, well, he's trying to deceive you. But
in the context of the genocide in Venezuela
and the infiltration of our country and the
division of the civil war, the point is
that that is almost meant to make you
go, Trump's lying, and miss the thousand other
criminal activities that are taking place, whether it's
Trump or Biden or anybody else. So in
this case, the point is, I guess, that
the Reagan overlap of whether or not the
at the tariff point was meant to make
you jump at this. It was meant to
make you go, he's lying about Reagan because
that's you're gonna people are gonna want to
defend something that they think he's wrong about.
But at the end of the day, was
that even the real point? Or is it
just to get you to react to that
to miss the bigger picture? Also, to throw
in the AI thing, which he keeps doing.
In some cases, it is. In some cases,
it's not. But it makes you go, well,
they have to tell us.
Nothing means everything. Everything means nothing unless the
power structure tells you. Sort of like the
World Economic Forum idea. Right? We'll let you
know when it's supposed to it's not new.
I said the game appears to be incessantly
to flood the zone. This is something that
Bannon talked about in a recent podcast saying,
you know, the not somewhat recent, that the
idea was to flood the zone with so
much BS that they won't know what to
do. They'll be reacting at every story and
we'll be getting our agendas done without them
noticing. Paraphrasing the last part.
And he says that, I wrote that the
game appears to be incessantly to flood the
zone of political discourse with deliberately false claims,
reports, and agendas in order to obfuscate,
distract from the real agenda. In my view,
that's the Zionist technocratic globalist shift. That's my
opinion. Whatever you think it is, whether or
not Trump lied about Reagan or whether or
not they lied about this, and it's not
just unique to Trump or even this current
administration, but it's been incessant.
So think about that as we go through.
Now what I'm grappling with is where that
line is. Right? Is this an important lie
that's necessary for me to break it down,
or is it just me wanting to go,
he's being dishonest
for the hundred thousandth time? And you see,
that's, to me,
very little importance to what's really going on
unless it ties to something much larger.
So flooding the zone, I think, are things
like this. Now what's interesting about it is
that even the Greenland thing, which doesn't seem
to be happening anymore, but it probably
happened again in a year from now, is
that it started out as a meme, a
joke. And everyone's like, you're so stupid for
falling, for them trolling you for that. And
then it kinda became real for a minute.
Like, within the the policy, the dealing with
the countries, even Canada, there was there was
some momentum there. So was that a lie
that became real? Was it real and then
stopped because nobody wanted it? It's really hard
to tell. Or it very well could have
just been flooding the zone, so we stopped
paying attention to the thousand things they did
within the first hundred days that had nothing
to do with what you thought was actually
gonna happen.
In fact, it was the opposite. Stargate and
CRISPR pig meat, whatever else we've talked about.
But the idea that he may run again
in 2028,
which he's, for the most part, watered back
recently, but Bannon the rest, they keep flooding
the idea that this is coming and he's
secretly gonna do it. You won't even know
even though they're being pointed to. But it
causes a lot of this kind of conversation,
much more than me just pointing to this
because it's everywhere. And he says because f
you on the hat. Like, they're trying to
make this be a response to people because
they know he'll do it. Now is it
of course, it's possible.
Especially if he thought he could and might
actually get away with it. That's I think
that's unique to not unique to Trump over
anybody, but it does take up the conversation
as opposed to the genocide, as opposed to
literally the globalist agenda playing out all over
the world while people who used to call
that out are pointing anywhere else.
Things like this, I just find humorous.
Flood the zone possibly. Maybe just they got
caught, and this is the line. Right? This
is exactly what I was talking about. So
he Pete Eggseth comes out in his PR
fake front kind of administration situation I think
they're running with right now. And he literally
pretends I mean, I don't I can't I
don't think he actually stated that I'm flying
this jet, but he very much clearly put
it out there for people to think that.
And then it it just waterfalled through
every one of these major accounts. All the
big I think and he count with MAGA
something, MAGA Patriot, MAGA speech. All of them
were sharing incessantly. They're probably all bots for
all we know with 100,000
follower accounts because they all just pair it
and share and retweet. But the point is
that he wasn't flying.
And that became a weird point. And this
person says, Pete Hegset, nice propaganda video for
himself that shows him riding as a passenger
in a jet. MAGA, it's so cool that
he can fly. Flyer jets. It's okay. Now
is that important?
Well, it might be to some. It might
be to make the point that he literally
has to fake what he's doing in order
to make people think he matters.
Or it could be designed to take you
down this path to go, look, look, he's
lying, which we know that they do every
day,
and we missed whatever they passed whatever more
important story took place that day.
See, like, things like this, MAGA voice. Oh,
my God. He just flew a jet. Now,
the reality is he didn't, as far as
I can tell.
Here Gronk will tell you, no. He didn't
actually fly. He was a passenger. He doesn't
even have the ability to. He doesn't have
his license. Okay.
But you see how unimportant that really comes
down to being in the larger picture?
But you can individually decide, you know, but
see this the case comes down to whether
you think it's important to catch them in
every little lie, even if it's petty and
small and has no real bearing on the
policy, unless it's just that convincing people you
should listen to him because he's so cool.
Right? It's it's it's a difficult now that's
not that hard of a choice for me.
That's a smaller point. But you see where
that line can become quite fuzzy. Now, in
regard to holding people accountable,
now the the this is even more of
a line because should I care that they
continually keep pushing in front of people that
Obama and Comey and James are all gonna
go to prison and it just keeps not
happening? At what point do I stop pointing
that out? At what point do I need
to go, well, everyone must know it by
now. Right?
That's hard, isn't it? Because I don't think
they all do. And then there's that line
again. Is that am I only screaming at
a bunch of people who already know that's
not true and will pay will share it
anyway? Or the people around my inner circle
that I know are kind of falling for
that but are good people? Where is that
line? It's difficult.
So this person says, Stephen Miller goes nuclear
on James Comey. It's truly one of the
most heinous things that's ever happened in the
history of our country. Can you believe he
said that yet again? Comey lying. I mean,
yes. It's not a small thing. Comey deserves
to be in jail. I've said that every
time. But the most heinous thing that's ever
happened in our country, that's he's making fun
of you, in my opinion. That's what Stephen
Miller does. This guy does not of everybody
in this government, of all of them, this
is the person that raises my concern more
than anybody.
Now I said more talk, more bluster. I
hope he goes to jail, Comey. But at
the moment, the case seems designed to fail.
Look into it, guys. Take a second to
look into what even their side are saying
about it. And it says, but Miller will
make the rounds getting you hyped and ready
to blame anyone but them when this falls
apart just the way they set it up.
That's how I view it anyway.
Dave Smith makes a bright point on the
twenty fourth. I know we live in crazy
times and there's a lot going on, but
remember four months ago when the director of
national intelligence said that Obama committed treason
and she hoped the proof had the proof
and was sending it all to the justice
department? Anything come of that? Seems like a
big deal. He's obviously making a point. K?
The reality is he she didn't say we're
investigating it for treason. She said he is
a he's committed treason. He's a traitor
and said we have the proof, not evidence,
proof.
And then nothing happened. Now you have to
understand, that's not some deliberate taking your time,
making sure your tees are cropped. If you're
telling us he's a tree he created committed
treason and you have the proof, that should
be he's in jail already.
Didn't not gonna I argue it will not
happen. Not that he shouldn't be. Obama is
a criminal. But that it won't happen because
they're all on the same side. That's how
I view it, at least when it matters.
But you get this.
This person,
1,300,000
followers, never even heard of it before, says,
president Trump on the stolen twenty twenty election.
We now know everything.
Okay. Well, this was the twenty sixth.
Okay. So if
Gabbard came out four months ago and gave
you everything, why is it suddenly only now
being reported that we know everything now? Because
it's about dripping this forward, in my opinion,
to make you think moment by moment, everything's
building up, which is what you get from
all the people that repeat.
MAGA voice says, oh my god. Holy s
h I t. Trump just casually posted an
iconic photo of himself. Jim, it's just just
okay. That's important. Right? Look. Trump posted things.
Oh my god. Everything's the greatest. Jim Ferguson
says, Tulsi Gabbard drops a political nuclear bomb.
This is this is from October 28. This
is today.
Director of national intelligence, Gabbard, just confirmed the
deep state never wanted you to know, which
was that Obama and Hillary knew everything meant
meant oh, rather this one. Obama knew Hillary
Clinton was mentally unfit for office. Obama withheld
national secret. Okay. Great. Just one thing after
the other. Put him in jail. I'm just
it's begin it's becoming
exhausting to have to keep going, oh my
god. And just one day, it goes into
the next and goes into the next. Next
thing you know, it's two years later. Oh,
don't worry. The Democrats are making it difficult.
At what point do you just go, maybe
they're lying to you.
That's what a lot of honest Republicans are
starting to do. But this just keeps coming
up. This is on Real America Voice. They
jump from show to show and they keep
I hope he goes to jail. If he
does, I will celebrate it because he's a
criminal, just like anybody should. If right now
somebody put Trump in jail for a crime,
I would go good because he committed crimes
and not go it should be them first.
It should be criminals that go to jail.
The problem is that we play the game
that they have they're the one that started
it like we're in kindergarten, and it doesn't
actually have any accountability, which is exactly the
way they designed this.
Even Mike Flynn.
This guy comes out in '26 and says,
oh my god. It's finally happening because Trump
said, again, out loud, that Obama will face
justice. 20 of the elect.
How many times do you say this out
loud? Michael Flynn, general Mike Flynn comes out
and says, he committed treason he needs to
go to jail. It's accountability hour. Well, was
that four months ago, or is that today?
Is it this hour? How long can we
keep kicking this can down the road? I
just said, oh my god. He said the
Obama thing for the fifteenth time. It's happening.
Tell me when Obama's in jail, where he
belonged, just like Trump. Until then, this is
getting pathetic.
We have Eric Dauberding,
one of these parent accounts that had I'm
not even making it up. Flashy light breaking
after literally anything Trump will sneeze hard, and
that's what you get. And, oh, the thing
happened, and he says US House Oversight Committee
deems all presidents Biden exec president Biden's orders,
executive actions null and void.
Well, realistically, that's not how this the legal
standing, like, is such a funny overlap. So
all that would mean is that that means
the second that Trump leaves, they could just
go, you know, same idea. Use their political
momentum to say everything Trump ever did is
no longer valid. What it means is nothing
means anything. You have a dictator, no matter
left or right, and they can do what
they want. Next person comes in and goes,
we're doing whatever we want because they started
it.
We we are being led by the children
in the room. It's not even a hype.
It's not like an insult. It's the reality
of people who are so blinded by their
team momentum that they don't which is not
even what they have right now. They're not
on the team, but that they don't are
unwilling to acknowledge where this is actually going.
But I'm not gonna argue that Biden is
legitimate. I think all of these people are
violating your rights. The point is that they're
now going back to the auto pen, the
same game.
He says the committee demands an immediate investigation.
Oh, great. More conversation,
more investigation,
more congressional hearings. Now I'm not gonna say
that's unimportant if this was actually trying to
be done.
I don't believe it
is. History shows that that's the reality with
where we are, that it's a bunch of
bunch of bluster and talk and investigations. Let's
reinvest the January 6 committee, and let's go
back there. And how much do you wanna
bet? Nobody ends up in jail. Historically, that
is the reality. That's not incorrect to point
out that obvious,
consistent reality. I hope they go to jail
tomorrow. It says, we are calling on the
US Department of Justice to conduct a thorough
review. Oh, okay. So they're just calling on
that.
Right? Not that it's actually happening. It's just
and this is how these trainings go. Everything
just changed because she stood in front of
you and said something.
The DC Board of Medicine just, must also
review the actions taken by Biden's physician to
hide his true condition. Great. So you just
have this sprawling effort to say literally everything
was said about him, including how fast he
walked. We are gonna prove it all. How
much you wanna bet none of this actually
happens?
Bonnie confirms the investigation has been opened after
this. Yes. And she says, my team has
already initiated a review of the Biden administration's
reported use of auto pens for pardons. That's
it. So all the big talk about everything
coming down and every single action he took,
maybe wouldn't surprise me. I don't see how
that would legally be uphold upheld, but it's
the auto pin again.
Now the main point
is if you can prove somebody else used
it, which seems to not even be on
the table for their conversation, then, yeah, that
would be a big deal. Trump has used
the auto pin many times. It's when they
use it to just expedite the stamping of
of the signing, and it's been ruled by
the Supreme Court more than once, which I,
frankly, disagree with, to be valid.
So when they come out and say, we're
gonna review this, what they mean is we're
gonna keep the narrative spinning. Well, we should
have already reviewed this. If there was anything
there, we would already know. Because if you
keep claiming it, you keep screaming how he's
doing this and doing that, and yet now
you're gonna start a review? Why wouldn't you
already be reviewing that? Why wouldn't you already
have him in jail if you argue he
was lying about this? It's not going anywhere.
It says his leadership, Comer's leadership, and his
will continue working with the oversight committee to
find accountability.
Again, if you think I'm down I they
should be in jail for a lot of
things. Using an auto pen, by the way,
which is not even a crime, proving that
he did actually let somebody else use it
or rather that he lied about his cognitive
abilities, which we know he did, is honestly
a big deal if you can prove that
they did so and allowed somebody else to
operate the government. They've never even they yell
that because they go, we know he was
incompetent, so therefore, we know somebody else must
have. That's not a fair that's not a
valid court argument that will ever end up
with somebody in jail. It's an argument then
to get you as partisans outraged and keep
the narrative flowing while none of them ever
see the inside of a jail cell.
But the TikTok, of course, comes out and
says bombshell.
House oversight committee just released a damning 100
page report deeming all Biden's auto pan actions
null and void.
Again, stating that on paper that you argue
what he did was illegal and null and
void does not therefore make his actions legally
null and void. Secondarily,
a 100 different things I could point to
that Trump is currently using still are some
of the things that Biden put into place.
So now you're telling me that things that
Trump are using are gonna become null and
void? Or, oh, oh, you mean only the
ones that you don't like that Biden did?
This just becomes insane. What they're doing with
this video is just trying to show you
that the signature is the same.
Okay.
Autopens aren't illegal. So is the argument that
therefore because the autopen was used that we
know without evidence that it was used by
somebody else, it's not an argument. If it
proves that, I'll support it too.
This becomes the problem with the way that
they're trying to sidestep all of this. James
Wood comes out and says, I would ask
those who insult and disrespect Pam Bondy to
consider that well planned and fully reasoned decisions
to prosecute are cases that win. I don't
disagree. He says the fact that she is
being deliberate and careful should be long loud
and rather than betray
berated. Excuse me.
Oh, because you know what she's doing?
James?
Deliver is she being deliberate and careful, or
is she just playing you like the fool
you are to extend this out and you
are giving her cover? You're telling him trust
the plan, team. Trust the plan. Give her
support because she's on our team.
These are the children in the room, guys.
What she's doing is not reasoned and deliberate.
It's very obvious that they've already been caught
lying to you about damn near everything they're
dealing with. This is the guy who would
support what she did no matter what it
seems.
Look at this. I didn't even see this.
Robert Barnes says, sorry, James, but that ain't
what she's doing. Blanche is actually in control,
is running out the clock. See how that
works? See, they even disagree on the way
this all work. The bottom line is James
Woods is running cover for the team, the
government.
Right? So if you wanna call something a
deep state, then it's gonna be the people
that are propping up this illegitimate situation, whether
left or right. Now, really, it's an unlikely
power structure despite the inability to make that
clear today. But
trust the plan, he says. Give her time.
Even though you said he was a traitor,
he's committed treason, we have all the proof,
we already sent it over.
But let's just wait and see what happens,
guys, because that's what measured population does. Right?
We just hope the government does what's right.
Who are these people?
Now Elon Musk comes out,
points to Ted Cruz yet again, and this
is the kind of spinning nonsense they put
out there. Now first of all, whether or
not Elon Musk intended to do a Nazi
salute to be objective,
who knows? The reality is he did what
was objectively a Nazi salute. Not that he
meant to, but that's what textbook ones looked
like from the shoulder to his extreme movement,
all about it. But I'm objective, and I
can say, who knows if that's what he
meant? Maybe he was doing it to troll
everybody and it went a little too far.
Maybe he just genuinely stupidly thought that aggressively
biting his lip and doing that motion meant
to the sky or the sky or whatever
he said it meant. My point is I
actually don't I'm not gonna say I know.
But objectively, you know, making a reasoned look
at it, it seems like a Nazi salute
with everything going on, more likely just to
troll people. But I don't know because that's
honest. The point is that ever since then,
anybody with their hand in the air is
then going, we know it's a Nazi salute,
because they're just being inherently dishonest. But it's
a tiny conversation.
So and we'll get into the Mamdani thing
more. I have a quick point about the
overlap to that. I plan on doing quite
a bit more in this because of how
alarming this is. I don't support Mamdani. I
just support politicians. I think all of them,
in many ways, he has shown to be
very problematic when it comes to very particular
left versus right politic political stance. When it
comes to Israel, he's saying a lot of
things I believe are right. Doesn't mean I
support a politician who will continue to allow
authoritarian control over your life. But what's funny
is they need you to be split down
that middle so they can keep you blending
one side or the other, and the system
marches forward.
But that's the game right now. Oh, look.
Him and the Muslims are bad. Oh, look.
Them and the the either the Jews, depending
on who you're talking to, or the Zionist
are bad. And the reality is quite obviously
what they're trying to point to are very
much people that are tapped into the same
system.
That's what's so frustrating about this. For all
we know, Mamdani is literally just part of
the same game and is being worked into
here to make it seem like it's something
else. The fact that they act like they
know. Why? Because he has ideas we disagree
with, but we're pretending we live in a
country where that's supposed to be allowed is
insulting to your intelligence.
The underlying point is he's a secret.
Jihadist is gonna overthrow the government. Great. Prove
that. Give me some evidence that I can
actually look at other than, look. He's a
Muslim. Look. He supports Muslim things. You guys
are children.
Ted Ted Cruz goes, are those Nazi salutes?
Like, you're so all you're doing, one, is
obviously, no one thinks that. He's trying to
downplay that that Elon Musk's was much more
similar, but we ultimately don't know. That's all
they're trying to do. Elon Musk goes, it
sure looks like it. All that does is
spin this out in a conversation distracting from
what is actually important.
You know, like Ron Paul continuing to reiterate
that what Trump is doing is failing the
country.
Empire first, America last was the the the
title from his last post.
Farmers edition. You know, all the farmers that
are being sold out by the government that
was screaming about how Biden was selling out
farmers? Funny how that works.
But you can watch it. It's just it's
a three minute clip. But Ron Paul,
one of the most principled people in the
conversation, pretty much always has been in my
opinion, and he is telling you that what
they're doing from the Liberty Report is not
for you, America. It's for the empire.
And I think we can all see what
that represents today.
Thomas Massie points out the federal government, on
October 26, spent $7,000,000,000,000,
$7,010,000,000,000,
which matters. It's a ton of money, point
o one,
In fiscal year 2025.
2025.
Now let's not forget that Doge just disappeared.
Right? No. No. She's all back on the
digital IDs and, you know, what it was
really about. Whatever Elon Musk did was pretty
clearly about scooping up data for AI. I
don't know how we deny that at this
point, but it's funny how they didn't even
try.
They didn't even try to keep Doge going.
They just
just vanished.
Now I'm sure you'll get some some lip
service about how things are moving in the
background.
They just there's I mean, that they don't
even they got caught lying so many times.
I think they just decided to put it
to bed. But recognize how crazy that is.
The cutting government in half and reducing cost.
No. No. We're spending more. Everything costs more.
It's worse than ever. Guess what? It's been
doing that for years. From left to right
to left to right. It's not something new.
And it it it oscillates, but it goes
up historically.
The federal government spent $7,000,000,000,000
in 2025.
That is a 3.9%
increase
from 6,700,000,000,000.0
spent in 2024.
So Trump has dramatically increased spending, but I
argue that would have happened regardless who was
there. We should be spending less, not more.
And he's the one that's not America First
according to the America First administration.
This is a fact post
simply talking to a farmer,
and it says, I was so I was
selling soybeans for which I don't I don't
want anyone. So soybeans for 16 point $16.80
a bushel. Trump announced those tariffs to China,
and the price plummeted all the way down
to $7 a bushel. Think about that.
You know, if you're making $16.80
on a bushel,
you know, the the return has to be
a certain percentage for that make that even
profitable to you. And if your price, your
revenue gets cut, I mean, in in half
instantaneously, then you're losing money for the rest
of that process the rest of what you
sell for that. Because, I mean, I would
argue in most cases unless you're doing a
hell of a good job making profit. But
it says the tariffs aren't working. Trump said
farmers are gonna get some money.
I haven't seen a dime. In October, Trump
has caused complete chaos in the agricultural sector.
Now it's one farmer's opinion. Okay? So it
doesn't represent every farmer out there. But in
my experience so far, whether farmers or any
number of overlaps, people are coming out and
going, look. I don't know what you're talking
about. My costs are up. Everything I'm buying
has more I mean, everything from from what
they're spending, from their rent, everything is going
up. And on top of that, the farmers
are struggling right now. And on top of
that, the 20,000,000,000 from the government, 20 more
billion from the, I guess, the globalist insiders
that Trump works with right now and dumps
$40,000,000,000
into Argentina, and it still seems to be
collapsing. Forces them into Argentine beef. And the
point is that there these farmers are struggling
already.
And what did he say? Your prices are
high because of me.
Do say lower your price. I forget exactly
what he said, but he basically chastised them
for making that point.
David Icke says one of Trump's roles for
the cult is to destroy independent farming so
colt billionaires like Gates can buy their land
and completely control food production. Remember that argument
that we've all forgot to point out now
that Trump's in power that's still absolutely happening?
We're reset, World Economic Forum that Trump is
very much still a part of today, and
we just pretend like it's not there, rather
the people that are screaming at the top.
He says it's happening around the world because
they destroy the farm the destroy the farmers
agenda is global. Thomas Massie also points out
another financial statistic. In The United States, debt
per person is a $113,000.
In Israel,
debt per person is $37,000.
Israel publicly funds abortions, whatever you think about
that. His point is to clearly aim at
their per the conservative side of the conversation.
His point is either way, why do we
send them our money? Now from a conservative,
like a Christian perspective, shouldn't that bother you?
I mean, there's so many inconsistencies
here, especially when it comes to the Christian
right supporting Israel. There's like it's in they
just they just pretend they're what you think
they are, and then
so many team sport players pretend that's what
the case. They pretend that's the case, even
though you can quite literally prove that most
of what they do is, like, inherently counter
to what their right seems to support.
But the point is about your tax dollars
because that's what that's coming down to. Whether
it's the Israel bonds, actually, I'll grab that
again for you.
A great a great,
article.
Oh, come on.
Of course, it doesn't pop up for me
even though hers does. Thank you. I'll just
share her link here. And this is the
article she wrote
for TLF, which I hope she's gonna get
some more coming soon. And it was simply
entitled how American tax dollars prop up Israel's
zombie economy.
It's exactly what we're talking about right now.
And this is on what we're talk showing
is only one part of that,
which is whether it's bonds, whether it's, you
know,
any number of overlaps.
Funding their genocide.
I mean, you could go on forever in
weird kind
of overlap. Like, even the military overlap in
in how there's legislation, I believe, 2024,
where they are the the legislation art says
that IDF members are basically synonymous with the
US military,
which absolutely makes sense when you understand what's
really going on. The point is that all
of this is you're basically subsidizing what they're
doing, your tax dollars. How is that America
first in any way other than trying to
pretend that what they do somehow keeps us
all safe, which I don't think even Zionists
buy at this point?
But
James Lee points out that if APAC can
unseat someone as popular as Thomas Massie,
by flooding the zone, interesting choice of words,
with millions of dollars, we might as well
call ourselves Israel.
The race is about more than just a
house house seat. It's to decide the soul
of America. I don't necessarily
disagree.
This is APAC tracker. These were lobby and
their billionaire donors have selected a candidate to
to to primary, Thomas Massie, and they're already
spending big.
Almost $2,000,000 just for this one this guy
in regard to what they're giving him in
in particular. But there's tons more flying out
to get this guy worked in. Trump supports
him. And guess what he blindly supports? Israel's
agenda.
Very clear about that.
So Vince Langman also points out. Right? So
we have the effort to unseat one of
the only America First politicians, it seems, in
this country.
Then you've got this weird overlap of now
Republicans
just showing you the true face and going
support Democrats if they support Israel,
and then happen to be fighting a Republican
that does not. How in the world does
that make sense to anybody who's not a
blind follower?
John Fetterman has voted with party to open
up the government 12 times in the last
few weeks.
Rand Paul has voted with the Democrats to
harm president Trump and keep the government closed
12 times during the same time frame. Let
that sink in. Now he's not saying explicitly,
but you can find the conversation all over
the Internet with him, with Cuomo,
that support him over him. Right? The Democrat
over the Republican. And one of the most
less than Massey in my opinion, but one
of the most Republican
or,
principled
actual America First politicians in the government.
So the argument is that
Fetterman,
a Democrat,
who had who the only thing they seem
to rely on in support of Israel is
more on our side than Massey, who aligns
with almost everything MAGA believes in but doesn't
support Israel, or at least in this case,
doesn't want to just doesn't wanna align with
Trump on the shutdown vote. That's it. That's
all it comes down to. You support us
blindly or we will turn you into the
enemy.
Guys, wake up. It just can't be more
obvious. Oh, I forget. It can. Here's James
Lee. Is Cuomo running for mayor of New
York City or for Tel Aviv?
Guys, look at that.
His poster says, stand with Israel, an Israeli
flag.
I don't even see an American flag on
that political poster in The United States. You
wanna explain that to me? Rally to support
the Jewish staff
state of Israel, it says.
Now he's been very adamant about this, that
he everyone else doesn't support, I believe, what,
Mamdani?
They don't support Israel. I do. And he's
like, that's his, like, main push right now.
This should be uncomfortable for everybody. If that
was Cuomo running with a Chinese symbol
with no American flag, would that be okay
with anybody? It shouldn't be either way.
And James Lee also points this out. I
mean, this is the weird stuff that I
mean, these don't prove anything.
But for those of us that are paying
attention and are cataloging
all of the evidence that shows very clearly
that Israel is aggressively controlling this country at
this point, this kind of stuff is just
a slap on your face.
Emily Austin puts this tweet out, gets 1,300,000
views. Let me see how much she has.
121,000
followers. It gets 1,300,000
views, sort of the opposite of the suppression
we deal with where we've got 77,000,
but we get, like, a thousand views, which
is just either one of those don't make
any sense. You could argue the if there
was the possibility of organic reach today, then
that might make sense here. But the other
way around, it just literally doesn't. People would
accidentally scroll past your post more than a
thousand times. They're knowingly suppressing. They don't even
hide it.
This case,
Emily says, being pro Israel isn't being pro
America.
That's the quote. So that's what a lot
of conservatives are saying. You know why? Because
it's true. And not just because one you
know, you could argue they align, but even
they don't. The interests of Israel are counter
to interests of Americans.
But then it goes, meanwhile, people in Israel,
and they post this video.
Oh, look. It's a bunch of Israelis who
just kind of randomly break out in weird
coordinated dance with American flags and stuff and
pictures of Trump, and they're like, yay. We
love America.
Yeah. That's not weird or completely organic.
What?
It's like, what is this? What is this
supposed to even be? They just wander in
and go, look. Weird. We caught a party
of America.
That's what they're doing, guys. That's I mean,
this is what how dumb they think you
are. James Lee rightly goes, that looks a
100% organic.
I mean, what in the world? Like, this
is how desperate this is to go you
know, right now, you have a very obvious
logically obvious, but very a major push largely
from conservatives that are going, you can't support
what they're doing and what they're doing to
this country and then pretend that supporting Israel
is supporting America.
You just can't. Right now, they're counterintuitive, and
this is what you get. Look. They're dancing
to Trump's face. So what that really shows
you is to them, supporting America is supporting
Donald Trump.
Isn't that exactly the quiet part out loud?
Yes. Supporting this is supposed to be America,
not what Trump wants. And look, Trump's face,
therefore, they support America. No. Trump right now,
in my opinion, supporting Trump is counter to
America. Supporting Biden is counter to America, but
that might be a step too far for
those that we might have been reaching right
there. It is the reality, though. The reality
that either one of them are part of
a presidential authoritarian post that we do not
want if we care or believe in the
constitution or or more so a world without
government, which we should be fighting for.
There's something beneath this I post. Oh, yeah.
Just this is just funny. This has been
going around. Right? This we deserve better psy
ops.
I mean, it's meant to be a joke,
obviously, because I don't think we want psy
ops. So the point is, like, you know,
they can't even they're not even trying, it
seems, or it's an indication of how,
you know,
ineffectual they've become.
Mel points out, thanks to America to the
American taxpayer,
Israel is now paying their reserve as soldiers
a minimum
of over $8,000
a month.
8,000 something when translated from the from the
shekel. It says meanwhile, the average American soldier
makes about 2,300
per month. Of course, if they can get
money from the government, seeing as how they're
not paying anybody.
Think about that. Who do you think that
comes from? Well, we already talked about this.
Your money is going to fund Israeli reservists.
Not a secret.
They're literally selling you out to a foreign
power acting like that's what you want.
Here's Eric Doherty.
Look at that. How weird.
Red light breaking. Almost like literally every single
thing he ever posted is red light breaking
news even though it's totally not, and you
can prove that. But, you know, objective care
and whatever. Just
it's worth making fun of how stupid that
is, but the point is,
as everyone's reporting, and he wasn't the first,
in an incredible development,
Ron DeSantis announces the partnership with Turning Point
USA to enable every high school statewide
to start a club American chapter. Great. So
a government
initiated
media pushback? Like, how do you make sense?
So if we're to believe that Turning Point
is, like, the media, independent media,
speaking truth to power, and then the government
rolls out chapters of that in schools through
government institutions and goes learn that. Does that
sound like that sounds like what the government
wants you to hear because it is.
I mean, there's no misunderstanding this, guys. Like,
this is if the government is rolling this
out, then the government wants you to hear
the information. So that's clearly not pushing back
against the power structure or the government at
large or any unless you just pretend that
only the right side of the you know
where this goes. Overall,
everything about this is counter to everything the
Republicans claim they're fighting for, whether it's independence
from government force you know, they're gonna try
to claim as, oh, we're just starting little
groups. Anybody can join. It's up to them.
Yes. But, overall, this is the government getting
immediately involved with Turning Point USA, on top
of that, with the actual institution of this
through schools.
This should be a line that should never
be crossed, and they're cheering it on because
they like, if this was Biden and Biden
had chose a group that he likes and
he was rolling out groups for their group,
what do you think they would call it?
We don't always have to make that point.
I mean, it should be self evident. If
you would be angry about Biden doing this
with a group that he chose,
then you should have a problem with this.
The point is they'll go, no, but Turning
Point is good. And my side of the
government is the good guy, and those people
have been lost for a very long time.
There will be no impediments to that and
certainly no discrimination. We're not going to allow
that. Okay. So the government is now allowing
what you can and can't do inside your
school groups. Fantastic. But I said, yeah. Nothing
alarmingly strange about this at all. The flood
of Zionist funding
that the Turning Point USA recently got after
Charlie Kirk's death,
right, that which Charlie had turned down
just before his death,
will no doubt remote an America first agenda.
Right? So the funding that Charlie was like,
no. No. No. Zionist funding, no right now,
that they then got
is now being used to roll this out.
So, obviously, it'll be America first, guys. I
mean, come on. And for the podcast, I
I put Israel crossed out onto
the how do you explain that? Like, you
know, Israel first agenda to cross it up
with America. It's obviously not in the interest.
I mean, this doesn't even align with what
Charlie seems to have wanted,
but that's not what they care about, is
it?
Donald Trump junior says the best way to
honor our friend Charlie Kirk is to keep
loudly and aggressively
fighting for the pro America values that we
all care about,
not backing down to the radical left.
Ian Carroll says, seems like we should start
by figuring out who killed him. Notice you
tripped all the way over your own tongue
when Megyn Kelly asked you about that. Oh,
I think I was gonna grab that. Here,
let me play it real quick.
How long is it? That's three minutes. I
don't care. The point is that clearly this
you know, he's
avoiding the obvious. But the real point for
me
is that does not seem to be what
he was doing at the end. Even Megyn
Kelly more than anybody seems to know that.
And all they're doing is making it about
Charlie, pro Israel, pro America,
bad guy lefties, which in a large way
was what he was doing. But overall,
it seems like an effort to try to
use Charlie, which is what we've been seeing.
Lastly, here's DC Drano
coming out on October 25. Now remember, Tyler
Robinson has not been found guilty.
That hasn't even started yet as far as
I can tell. He still has yet to
even claim that he he he hasn't said
I did it. Everyone else around him says
that.
He DC Drano comes out the twenty fifth
and says, before Charlie was killed,
he started to speak loudly about the import
importation of radical Islamic values into America.
You see, already, you could tell why this
is dishonest because he was speaking about that
long before recently before he was killed.
So it's a misrepresentation of even that. But
he was, yes, talking about that quite a
lot. He saw what was coming from Zohran.
Oh, now you're gonna make it about the
guy they're all pointing to. Maybe he did.
If we're going to continue Charlie's mission, we
have to fight like hell against this one
guy, Zoran, mom
mom Donnie.
Because he has beliefs that you disagree with,
what crimes is he committing?
Right? The idea that you're actually arguing you
should not let him speak because he has
bad ideas is the opposite of what Charlie
said he believed in. I can point to
examples where he didn't actually follow through with
that, like in this kind of example, I
would argue.
Or the idea that, you know, you're saying
he is the one you have to fight.
The idea is because he's a Muslim and
because you don't agree with his political stance,
which I don't either. I think government is
bad whether it's socialist or democratic. The point
is that you guys pick one to go
that's the bad one even though while simultaneously
pretending we have freedom of thought in this
country, freedom of religion, freedom of ideology.
You're all hypocrites. I think the world is
beginning to see that. But here's what I
changed it to.
Before Charlie was killed, he started speaking loudly
about the importation of radical Zionist values into
America.
He saw what was coming. If we're going
to continue Charlie's mission, we have to fight
like hell against this Zionist agenda. There. Fixed
it for you. Because because here's the crazy
part is if you're gonna try to argue
anything was shifting before he died, no one
can pretend it's not obviously
realizing the Zionist problem.
Now you could argue it's about Jews alone.
You can argue it's about Israel at large.
I think it's quite obvious it was about
the Zionist overlap because he was still struggling
and supporting Israel,
but not Netanyahu. I think it becomes very
clear what this was, my opinion. But the
reality is you can prove this. Here are
three things that show you alone. And in
the last couple of weeks, that's what he
was actually coming around to. The idea of
his as awareness of the of what he
argued was the concern of just Muslims in
this country in general had been going on
quite a long time before that.
These people are desperate to get you thinking
anything but what is actually happening. That's what
I see. Now look, there is an obvious
issue to be discussed. Whether you wanna make
the very clear point that Israel very much
does use
Arabs of lots of different kinds to infiltrate
countries as if they're working for jihadists when
really it's the Mossad, not a secret. They
literally have a name for these things.
But or arguing that Muslim countries are using
their immigration to manipulate this country. Those are
all possible real things. My point is the
former you can prove, like, right now in
real time that they've done in the past,
whether Israel, Muslim countries are doing that. I
think to some degree, you could probably make
a case for that, that it's happened and
very clearly is a problem. But crimes are
what I care about. So if you have
somebody legally in the country, then show that,
prove that,
go through the process. The overall the real
issue here is that them trying to create
this over this alarming shift to say,
Muslims are the real problem, and they're trying
to make it about Israel to ignore that.
You could make that case, but it's objectively
clear that the evidence is slanted aggressively to
one side. And then even then, the cases
you wanna point to to make the argument
of Muslims being a problem are largely built
up by the Zionist agenda, like the MEMRI
channel or the RAIR
channel or the you know, it's the very,
very clearly clumsily put together Zionist editions of
what they want you to think Muslims are
all doing.
That's a provable reality. Does that mean in
some cases they're not that they're doing that?
Yes. It can. There are examples of these
things. But for them to make this the
case, it's about trying to derail the obvious
of what's happening in the country,
to try to argue that what's coming is
much worse.
Now let's just even say both are true.
What would be the more immediate threat? The
reality of what Israel is literally doing in
our country now or what they claim might
be coming? Look what's happening in Europe.
Even if both were true, the first is
obviously the more pressing. But reality is there's
much more to this story,
which I'm gonna do more on in general.
I would love for somebody if there's somebody
out there, like, for example, that lives in
Dearborn Dearborn, Michigan, I would love someone to
reach out to me. I would love to
do I'm trying to find somebody who can
actually go there,
speak to people. Right? Actually, objectively, to satisfy
my own curiosity about what they're literally saying
on the ground, not what Matt Walsh says
or other people that have shown themselves to
be manipulative when it comes to politics. Just
say it lightly.
But I'll include these. Was Israel involved with
Charlie Kirk's death? Let's take let's look at
the facts. That was on twelfth.
As well as,
Kerry Weather's recent article for t Lab, the
Charlie Kirk hysteria is a blueprint for future
political chaos. That is objectively clear. It's what
they're doing as we speak.
Now overlapping these points,
social media censorship and a couple more points
about Israel to get into the the next
the the ceasefire lie.
Doze designer on the twenty seventh, that's yesterday,
came out and said, x x will be
will soon be excuse me. Will soon show
which country is,
God,
x will soon show which country a user
is based in. And maybe it's like because
of the way my mind would write that
sentence, it like tries to change it. This
is funny, that's not an editor's perspective. But
it says the users can choose to display
either their country or region. Now we also
saw the point of the dual citizenship.
I might make a point about that depending
on where it goes. The absurdity of having
Massey,
rightly so, roll out a legislative push about
why that should be identified and, you know,
either removed or changed
in regard to, you know, being an American
citizen to be in politics and nothing else?
And what did Randy Fine say? He called
him a bigot. He called him racist. He
called him disgusting. And then he rolls out
his own version of it. So what does
that show you? Right? It shows me, and
it connects to this point for the same
reason, that they're trying to build a version
of it that works for their agenda. Randy
Finesse, a blind, blind
he's one of the worst people I've ever
seen in my life, and I mean that
legitimately.
Lexile Laura Loomer, and he's, like, bigoted, disgusting.
Like, the kind of person that is cheering
on genocide while acting like they're the hero
in the room is the worst thing in
my mind. So he bomb you know, bombs
away when shown dead images of children more
than once,
laughing about children losing eyes in the pager
attack because they're all terrorists. Like, literally saying
things like this. Now pushing more than anybody
that Muslims shouldn't even exist in this country.
It's insane.
But the point is that if you have
a dual citizenship push that they roll out,
one of two things is gonna happen. Well,
one of three, really. I argue that, obviously,
that they'll just create a loophole for very
particular overlaps. They won't be like Israel's not
there, but it'll be something that will allow
an, you know, an o an opening for
certain situations. Like, if they you know, you
know where this goes.
There was another one I was thinking of,
but the main point for me guys, let's
realize.
Right now, we're not necessarily dealing with Israeli
citizens quite literally packing our government. There is
an overlap for sure.
But it's about politicians
who have been blackmailed, bribed,
you know, or blindly working because of other
reasons for a foreign power that you can
literally prove or just lobbying funding. So you
don't necessarily need that reality because as far
as I can tell, there's only a few
that are not you know, the overlap of
whether they're Jewish and in this government versus
an Israeli citizen is an important distinction.
Jew being Jewish does not therefore make you
a Zionist, in my opinion, does not therefore
make you part of the problem. So the
reality is that there's clearly
the problem is that they have influenced our
government, which is clear. That's not that's obvious.
So whether or not they pass this thing
and act like that proves Israel's not involved
or whatever is designed to kind of bury
the reality. I don't think it'll work, but
that's what a lot of this is. So
in this case,
a lot of people are going, look. Your
your platform is ridiculous. It is completely overrun
with Zionist bots. And every day, oh, we're
fixing Grok because it gave you the answer
that we don't want you to see.
So this says we'll soon be adding the
country of the user. Well, how easy would
it be for them? I'll just read what
I said. There will be a way for
them to simply present the ones that they
already work with as what they want you
to see. I mean, Twitter's Elon Musk in
particular has been caught lying about very basic
things that are just small petty things, like,
you know, h one b visas or wipes
the South African genocide, like, being very embarrassingly
caught for trying to deceive you. And then
getting very little coverage from the left media
that supposedly hates his guts. Funny how that
works out. But overall,
the point is that they could easily just
go, well, that's not the case. He's in
India.
Or rather, you know, Israel, but he's actually
in India or vice versa. The point is
they could just easily just pretend like they
vetted it and didn't because they have an
interest in working with the Zionist effort. But
then it says, and even if this is
an honest effort and they really do want
to just make this the case. Right? I'm
sure that certain actors have numerous ways around
this. Right? Exactly the way Israel already presents
its companies as American.
We've got over this many times. Like, right
now, like like, this one.
The article Whitney wrote. I think it's the
last one she wrote for T Lab, by
the way. There will you know, by the
way, on that note, there will be eventually
some more TLAB writing work, but Whitney has
been very much focused on limited hangout more
than anything and is dealing with a lot
of personal stuff in the background. So whether
the one thing I keep hinting at is
something that her and I are gonna be
doing coming soon. But this whether she writes
more will eventually come to pass, which is
not it's not my biggest point to put
more pressure on her. But we'll just there'll
be more coming. But the point was this
seems to have been, I think, her last
one she wrote, The Prince and the Spy.
And this is very important because many different
overlaps and it actually relates to what we're
talking about in a second is the Israel
infiltration. And that you can literally point to
the fact that they tell you that they
create companies through
the intelligence apparatus that are meant to serve
the government,
but present as countries in their country in
other countries that they're built in. And on
top of that, Eric Prince was used as
sort of like this cutout American. So you
have an Israeli company run by Israelis who's
then has him at the front and they
go, American company.
That's that's how that works. So my point
is to show you how easy it is
to go, oh, they're an American or they're
working in America, so therefore they are American.
Or just like a vault seven point, just
be using a computer that pretends to be
in America. It's not difficult for them to
manipulate the situation. So So just think about
how easy it I think these are efforts
to try to make you go, oh, look.
Ryan's been lying about Zionism by trying to
convince you of things like this.
Overlapping with censorship, I just thought it's worth
pointing out how dishonest this is.
I am I acquired Twitter in order to
preserve freedom of speech in America. The first
amendment, Elon Musk recently said, yet again. And
I said, the only issue is you instantly
censored people for Israel and your own personal
meltdowns.
Anybody arguing otherwise is just lying to you.
It was on record. It was public.
So not free speech at all. In fact,
straight up hypocrisy.
No. So nothing new, by the way, for
Elon, Jack, or anybody else. Anyone framing this
otherwise is dishonest or blinded by partisan politics,
possibly both. Think about him still saying this
to this point, after he's been caught in
very bombastic ways, quite literally censoring people, not
even around Israel, about things that he was
embarrassed by. But, yeah, we save free speech
because I said it out loud 65 times.
Embarrassing.
Well, to that point,
I found this really interesting and it really
speaks to the manipulation of all of it.
Well, I wanna make sure I didn't forget
something. One second.
Yeah. I'm gonna put this here in one
second. I'll come back to that. This one
too.
Yeah. I don't know how I mix those
up.
You that one you've seen. We'll play in
a second. But this this is the interesting
point.
Wait. Here we go.
That on Twitter,
you saw I I think, propaganda and co
did something recently as well where they said
I mean, whichever ones it was. You know,
deport all blacks, deport all Christians, deport all
everything
from race to to to religion, and then
said deport all Jews, and that instantly got
flagged. You I mean, you can't ignore how
ridiculously obvious that is. Now Glenn says unbelievable
or not really. Laura Loomer and other Israel
loyalists has spent weeks screeching that Muslims shouldn't
be allowed to vote,
to be in The United States or hold
public office, which is just an incredible argument,
guys. I mean, that's just disgusting.
What you're arguing there is Muslims
inherently are wrong, bad, other.
I don't know why that's even an argument
that's even a con are considered. I mean,
that's what he's kinda saying here. He says,
to satirize that, Turning Point USA's Evan
a Kilgore
said the same about Jews
right over Loomer's tweet verbatim.
But Israel loyalists chopped off the context to
make it seem like his statement came out
of nowhere.
All so they could do what they most
love,
scream racism and self victimize.
Never.
Cleanse a Jewish person himself.
So what he said is Jews shouldn't be
allowed to hold office in America. Who agrees?
Literally, what what Loomer wrote. This case seems
to be hap I just did a second
ago with with Charlie Kirk. Right? Just flipping
the reverse on it. But what's funny is
he she said, you know, Muslims shouldn't be
allowed to hold office in America. Who agrees?
Nothing.
He writes, Jews shouldn't be allowed to hold
office in America. Who agrees? And it instantly
gets suppressed.
This guy grabs just the clip of it
and says, this is another turning point guy.
The president of the Heritage Foundation came out
strongly this weekend to defend Trump's point speak
so making it seem like, look. Look. There's
even a problem still.
The screenshot deliberately omits context. It's replying to
and mimicking Laura Loomer's post replacing the word
Muslims.
So this is just I mean, you have
to see how desperate this is. You wouldn't
need to selectively alter and dishonestly
frame
what they say is everywhere,
if it was everywhere.
That they continually get caught for trying to
misrepresent things or have a guy go in
with secret camera and try to manipulate
a situation to make it seem like they're
being,
you
know,
treated with rape. And what's the word looking
for?
That's so weird. You know, treated in a
racist manner and
getting caught trying to deceive the situation, even
with mainstream platforms.
So before I get to that, this is
what I wanted to show
this first. This is what I was saying
from before.
Is it so here we, you know, we
have the idea of creating front companies. Right?
Which is what they do. You also have
the idea
post the pager. I this is the show
we did about Israel's infiltration of the tech
field in light of the pager attack, which
that's why this is over here. Sorry. I'm
I just had this a little bit mixed
up. And I'll play this again real quick
for us to remember this. First, I'll show
you this.
An Israeli military company
called Contra Precision Technologies Limited
has opened its first branch in The UAE
under the name
Contraps Emirates
Limited,
fully owned by the parent company and operating
from Abu Dhabi's free trade zone.
The company specializes in electro optical systems for
intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeting,
marking targeting
marking a significant expansion of Israel military tech
in The Gulf. But my point,
if it's cold,
con Contraps Emirates Limited
had this not been highlighted like this, and
it went on for years. This was a
UAE company. It's in The UAE. It's making
UAE products. How long does that become? How
long until it or maybe it already was
set up that way to be presented as
a UAE company that is literally run by
Israel?
You this is not a secret. This is
just a very public overlap that I wanna
use to make the point.
Right in this moment, we have the whole
this The United States more than anyone I
can see, at least from in what I
can look at, is it like, I the
joke the point I make is it's like
chickenpox. If you look at a map of
where these company this country is overrun as
Whitney's called out forever
with
startup companies that Israel's government created as a
front for their intelligence operation that is controlling
things like nine one call centers,
electronic over the the infrastructure or or dam
infrastructure, any number of things that this government
has shown they're willing
to collapse
should it be in their interest,
to recognize where that puts us and recognize
that they'll even willing to admit it. Hezbollah
to buy this.
Well, obviously,
they didn't know that they were buying it
from Israel. Who did they buy it from
or think they were buying it from? We
have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
shell companies over shell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global
production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
It's really not hard to understand that.
The and this is this is a sixty
minutes post that came directly from their interview.
Israel set the interview up. Israel promoted the
interview. So, yes, they could be lying about
it. But at the very least, that means
they want you to think they're doing that,
which how would that make possible sense when
you can prove that it's actually happening? To
me, this is about gloating. It's about floating
the idea, flaunting the idea, and basically demonstrating
that you could do whatever you want. And
then having American media not only go, that's
what's happening, then go, that's they're, you know,
praising them for what they're doing around the
world. Controlling supply chains. Isn't that a crime?
Yeah. Very much so. But only not when
Israel does it, apparently.
So here is that interview or that that
all include that article for you to read.
Now here's Eric Doherty, and I will make
a point about this in in a you
know, I have a lot of, like, a
whole,
window that I've got lined up with a
bunch of this stuff. But here he is,
again,
flashing red light.
But look look. He mixed it up just
in.
Interesting.
He says two major American cities are about
to elect Muslim communist as mayor.
Okay. So are you arguing there's a crime
being committed? Are you saying that there's somebody
manipulating that process? Are you just going, oh
my god. They're voting for people we don't
like.
You know the answer.
It's unreal.
Minneapolis, New York City. Okay. He says the
consequences of being, quote,
legally
invaded.
You see, that is the quiet that's exactly
what I'm trying to highlight for you guys.
That's it's building. We just don't know how
to stop it. It's what they were doing
to you when the Republicans were the not
leading party. Like, this is him trying to
argue that right now because of the laws,
they're able to do this secretly.
I've been trying to articulate this for a
long time now. It's the point they made
this morning about Loomer and the rest. If
you're not willing to sign with the principle,
even if you know that they're using that,
then you don't have a principle.
The point is that these people, if you
argue they're breaking the law, then make your
case. If your argument is they have ideas
we don't like, even if you can prove
those ideas are dangerous and everyone wants those
ideas or people are choosing in these areas
to put those people in positions of power,
if your argument is, then that's you're literally
either arguing against the system that you claim
we should have
or and now even more so supporting what
you claim they were doing to Donald Trump.
Like, these people have no principle. There's no
guideline. It is our ideas are good. Everybody
else is bad. And anything they do to
challenge our ideas is bad even if they
use the same logic that we use, even
if they have the principle that we use,
even if they claim free speech, well, they
don't get it because their ideas are bad.
It's childish in nature.
These cities are dooming themselves, it says. I'm
not in any way supporting their policies or
any of them individually. I don't I think
government shouldn't exist. That's why this is so
confounding, people like this, to try to challenge
what we're saying because they have to pretend
that you're on the other side of the
paradigm for them to try to make your
argument. When When you come in from, like,
this argument, they either try to argue you're
blackpilled or that you're fence sitting. No. It's
it's they have no argument because the reality
is
if these people are being elected
and I'll even go further and argue that
I don't believe our votes even translate this
process. So it would show me these people
are probably being put in position by the
larger apparatus to be used against us. I
I would question that. They're unwilling to do
so. They're of the mind of the other
side. People like Cuomo, you know, a lifelong
Democrat operative that's very much part of the
the whatever you wanna call the the real
operating structure for buying everything. No. He's the
good guy because we don't like this guy
who talks bad about Israel.
Anyway, the larger point again, legally invaded. So,
what's the argument they're making is that right
now, what they're doing is not breaking the
law. That's exactly what he's making the case
for right there, but we need to change
that because they're using the things that are
inherent, God given, in order to hurt us
somehow, that we can't really prove right now,
articulate other than some mass overtaking of ideological
culture.
God, it's just I mean, and even to
that, I'm not gonna disagree that there are
points to be made. I just it's just
the only way to have this conversation without
flailing in in an hyperbolic kind of opinion
everywhere is to stand with your principle, is
to ask what the real point is. What
is the issue here? Are you worried that
people are trying to, you know, invade the
country and change out? Okay. Then what what
the argument then is that we shouldn't have
the system of governance. We should the society
we have because then people can come in
naturally and slowly start changing ideas and get
people to be on their side. Or are
you arguing that they're manipulating that, that Muslims
are secretly coming in and invading and altering?
If that's the case, then prove that. I
back you up. You know that's not what
they're doing.
See, this is gonna be framed as me
defending one way or the other. It's just
principle, guys. It's objectivity.
You know, if you we it comes down
to what you can actually prove. And these
people seem to be kind of rational right
now about anybody who is brown. And it's
funny how that becomes the very point they
argue was ridiculous woke left telling them they're
all racist, which wasn't true. And now they
come out and go, Muslims bad. It's just
and I don't mean everybody. I mean the
team sport politics of it all.
Now Riley Gaines comes out and says we're
being destroyed from within and simply just shows
Montani on stage.
So again,
if this was any other guy, apparently, we
wouldn't be destroyed from within, at least in
this context, because the problem is that he's
Muslim.
Or that you argue like, I mean, I'd
love to hear Raleigh Gaines. What are you
saying? Are you saying that he is secretly
doing something against the law? Or are you
simply saying that within the law and people
want him to be there, you don't like
that, and they're all misguided, and the Democrats
are taking over the country? Like, you guys
have lost the plot in what you think
you're fighting. Because if you don't if you
if you think you're fighting the Democrats who
are secretly doing bad things to you, then
you're missing the half the picture, which is
that your government is doing that to you.
All of it. All sides are manipulating all
of us to achieve the larger agenda that
you're all missing by pointing at half the
problem. And, again, this is why they won't
even respond to these arguments because they don't
know what to say back.
Now pager infiltration,
the pager attack, one of the most obvious
terror attacks I've ever seen in my life.
Ten years, they claim. They let these pagers
circulate. 75%
women and children that suffered because of what
they did. And then it got praised by
the West who claims to fight terrorism.
Now with Caitlin Johnstone oh, lord. Where's the
this first.
Now on the point of the pager attack,
I just wanted this to be seen before
we get into everything else. DDGEO politics points
this out.
Trump admits
he was in on the pager attack and
overthrow
Bashar al Assad. Now you my gut
is this is just Trump trying to take
what he thinks is something to be credited
for.
You're like, somehow, I was I was the
secret mind behind the thing that everybody is
now pointing to even though I argue that's
only within the mainstream conversation and most average
people are disgusted by whatever the hell they
claim that was or the idea that the
overthrow of Assad. Are you not are you
actually of the mind that you think that
people praise that?
Insider politicians do. Insider blind mainstream alternative media
people do, but everyone else in the world
can see that you just gave the very
person you said was a terrorist control of
the country. And Israel is murdering and raping
and ethnically cleansing, and we're like, yay. Freedom.
And Trump comes out and goes yeah. Insinuates
that he was the one really to me,
that's just him not even being aware of
what's going on half the time. But it
says in the Time Magazine interview, Trump admits
direct involvement in the Israeli pager attack that
killed Hezbollah leaders and paved the way for
the overthrow of Assad and hurt 75% women
and children. It says here,
Trump said, and, you know, all those attacks
were done in auspices with, actually, with me
directly. See, that has all the hallmarks of
Trump just trying to extend what he thinks
is his his, you know,
legacy,
but by still supporting Pfizer shots and so
on, which so he point so that alone
shows you that he's either not concerned with
what you think or he doesn't know what
you think. Who knows what's possible this day's
days? But overall, he's taking credit for this
probably because he thinks that will benefit him,
not because it actually happened. But even if
it did, then good. And they're more more
so a war criminal than before.
Israel's responsible for largely what we're talking about
here. But it says, you know, with Israel
doing the attacks, with the pagers and all
of that stuff, literally said that. He said
they had a look. They've been Israel's been
very respectful of this country. What a clown.
Oh, you mean the Israel who got caught
putting spy devices on the White House back
in your first administration? The Israel that you
said used to control Congress? The Israel that
has continued to carry out terrorist attacks all
over the world, who's literally occupying and genociding
multiple countries. But, yeah, they're super respectful of
what we do.
That's somebody who's not in control and says,
and they let me know everything. They clearly
do not. Even Trump has admitted that before,
but he's saying this now because that's what
he does.
I'm the best and I'm the one. I'm
in control. Everyone knows that. No. They don't.
Only people that blindly repeat what you're saying.
And sometimes I'd say, no. They'd be respectful
of that or not.
Fantasyland. But Obama treated Israel so badly.
God. It's just so just nonsense all the
time. And I said, or at least he
seeks to take some credit for it. Either
way, supporting terrorism. So nothing new from The
US Government.
They also add, people thought the gold plated
pager was a simple gift. Remember they gave
Trump this?
Press with both hands?
No. It was a it was to commemorate
their achievement together. If he's telling the truth,
which it's hard to know, this could amount
to a violation of the Logan Act, The
US law that forbids private citizens from conducting
diplomacy or coordinating with foreign governments on military
or political matters. The act was created to
prevent individuals from undermining US official foreign policy
or acting as shadow governments.
So Caitlin says something important.
I really do think this is important to
think about.
Now in, like, a, you know,
an objective nonpartisan way, which is it's funny
to say that because I feel like so
many people have that's just it's impossible for
something to get beyond it. But this is
such an objective, just kind of basic logic
point. She says, you think Hamas
killed Israel because they're a bunch of monsters
who hate Jews?
Of course, you do. You're 12.
You think Trump is trying to get rid
of Maduro because Maduro is an evil dictator
who wants to poison America with fentanyl, you
know, despite all the facts? She says, hell
yeah, homie. You're 12.
You think Putin invaded Ukraine because he hates
freedom and democracy and wants to conquer the
world? Bless your heart, my 12 year old
buddy. You think The US and Israel have
been attacking and eliminating rivals in Iran, Lebanon,
Syria, Yemen, and Palestine in order to fight
terrorism,
stop tyranny, and protect the world from nuclear
weapons? Yeah. That checks out. You're 12. The
ultimate example of everyone is 12 now thinking
is in the mainstream worldview
promoted by western pundits and politicians which holds
that the world is full of evil monsters
doing evil things simply because they're evil while
being opposed by the virtuous good guys of
The US led world order.
It's just laughable. And it says it's like
a children's cartoon with the bad guys doing
bad things simply because they're bad and the
good guys striving heroically to stop them. It
sounds like a a stupid PG 13 summer
blockbuster starring The Rock.
But it's the consensus worldview of serious professional
pundits and analysts who share this view on
mainstream platforms with serious expressions on their faces.
And anyone who calls any part of it
into question is dismissed as an extremist or
deranged crackpot because everyone is 12 now. Now
Now, see, I differ on the main take.
I get her points well taken.
But I don't believe that represents the majority
of people and the ones that are on
these platforms. I don't even think all of
them believe it. I think that they know
where their marching orders come from. They know
what feeds them. They know this is what
they need to say to be on the
talk show circuit. Right? That's what it's it's
manufacturing consent.
Either way, this is exactly where we are.
The people that are supposed to be at
the highest level of the conversation are talking
about Iran, never even been to Iran. Like,
we've lost ourselves in all of this, but
that's where we are today. It's insane to
think this makes any sense. But especially coming
from a a group, either Israel or The
United States, who has such a long provable
track record of major crimes and lying about
those crimes that we will just go, oh,
they must be doing the right thing for
the right reasons.
It's quite sad.
This, I think, is an important one to
start with on the Israel point.
Now this is a video that you've probably
seen,
sixty minutes again, with Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
And Witkoff either is I mean, it's hard
to say because I like I've said many
times over the years. I think I even
have an example of this in a later
part of the show. I'm not I forget
if I added it or not. But Israel,
Netanyahu in particular,
Netanyahu has more than once
like, like I was just saying, been in
front of Trump and The US media,
and let these things fly. You know, Trump
is in control, this and that, and then
gone back to his side and just been
like, not true. I control everything. They don't
know what they're doing. I can do whatever
I want. You know, it just it's and
then that they don't push back. People like
us will talk about it in Western media,
and it just becomes so or acknowledging how
easy it is to manipulate the left and
the right paradigm, how the government does whatever
he wants it to do, I mean, more
than once. So and my point is that
people like Witkoff,
who very much same with Kushner, by the
way, but very much are like people working
for Zionism,
comes out and says something that
exposes the real plot. And even Kushner seems
to kinda be like, so my point is
whether he meant to do it or not,
it's hard to say. I can see a
world in which that was done in order
to be like Israel is the real one
in charge. Right? And then and watch as
the Israel the US government and Trump and
everyone else just don't even talk about this.
That would mean something. But also maybe he
just
the junior
team. It's hard to say. The point, a
master plan
that Jared's been working on for two years.
Right.
Two years.
Okay. So, basically, before October 7. And look,
you guys know this already. We've talked about
the Gaza plan, the reality of the they
had the island plan. All these have been
floated long before October 7. That's why everybody
honest was like, yeah, that's not new. That's
not because of this new thing to help
Palestinians. Look, we can prove that now, by
the way, as they execute all of them.
The reality is this was always the plan.
October 7 appears to have been a part
of that if you're really honest about the
facts.
Of the plan is the reconstruction,
the building, rebuilding of Gaza. Mhmm. And,
you're builders,
you've been in real estate.
As you said, it's extremely complex.
Tell us more about the plan and how
much it's gonna cost, where's the money gonna
come from,
and who's gonna award the contracts?
Three questions.
I think it's going to cost a lot
of money. What's a lot of money?
You know, the estimates are in the $50,000,000,000
range. It might be a little bit less.
It might be a little bit more. I
happen to think that that's not a lot
of money in that region. You have governments
that are gonna jump on in. And So
the,
Middle East
countries are gonna
provide the money? Yep. What
just like with the post war Iraq,
it it's gonna be a boon for for
people that wanna tear down and take what
they can. Right? George Galloway, one of the
lone voices calling out the oil for food
program or oil for what was it? You
know, they they they stole everything they could
that wasn't tied down.
These people, this is a free for all
of the Gaza,
what do they call it now?
I forget the term they use. You know,
call just talking about, like, some real estate
deal in a boon.
Not even mentioning the Palestinians. They're just brushing
to the side like they don't matter. This
is a terrifying time for us to exalt
like, to acknowledge the kind the depth of
evil that we're actually dealing with, and that's
just government, guys. It's not even I mean,
I call it evil because it is. But
realize this is not some, like, new version.
This is what government does. They argue they
are doing this to for your benefit while
all they wanna do is control your life,
and they argue that the absolute control of
your life is what will probably benefit you,
maybe not though. Do you see European participation
and so forth?
I think
the beginning of this plan is how to
get it going,
and that's that's what me and what me
and Jared work on all the time. The
money raising, we think, is the easy part.
We think that happens
relatively quickly.
But it's the master plan, and we're working
with a group of people who have,
been working on master plans for the last
two years.
So there are plans already. We have plans
already. We have a master plan already. And
by the way and Jared's been pushing this,
and we're working together on it.
And I think if the world saw the
progress so far, they'd be pretty impressed. Even
she's like, wait. What? So you have a
plan that was there before you knew you
would need the situation? Like, you have to
understand, guys, if the master plan was being
put together before October 7 or let's just
say right afterward, how in the world would
you know that the sir the current circumstance
of complete like, not a stone on top
of a stone in Amalek style
would be the reality?
Because that was their plan. I just this
needs to be taken. The reality that they
had intended from day one or seventy five
years ago to ethnically cleanse every single Palestinian
as vast or, you know, in every way
they possibly could.
We're watching these people now benefit from that.
They're trying to use this to rapidly
like, let let's, like, let's just say that
they get everyone out of the way, they
turn into some Gaza paradise that only certain
people allowed to go to. These kind of
people will go on forever saying he saved
the Middle East when what he did was
literally ethnically cleanse the people they don't want
out of the side. Exit stage left was
dump the knot over there, Overthrow countries that
say anything else,
left or right.
How long this has been going on?
A master plan. Even the term itself,
disgusting.
So
what we saw, and this is an important
one to recognize, and I have a point
briefly about this in regard to Robert being
censored.
But on the twenty fifth
so the false cease fire has been ongoing.
They'd already started kind of reinitiating the ongoing
war, but this was before, like, the announcement
news wire.
Israel army says con it says it conducts
strikes targeting
Islamic jihad
in Gaza.
Okay. So here's what's interesting to me. There's
no it's not like we're only the bombing
was supposed to stop. Even though we know
that they were bombing the entire time, but
they were. It's easy to prove. It was
covered everywhere. I'll play a video for you
in a minute from the UN that makes
it undeniably clear. The point was that on
top of that,
they decided to bomb
Islamabad.
Now, would you they wouldn't argue that was
a violation like they've done before because it's
not Hamas. But it's not Hamas, it's about
Gaza and Palestine and the Palestinians.
But on top of all of that, just
wanna show you that they can just they're
gonna keep doing it, which is kinda the
main point I'm making.
I said, how long have we been seeing
this? Suddenly, Hamas is just one part
of the issue and the genocide continues. Now,
whether that's what they choose to use this
for or not, you realize that all of
these may super inside talking heads and Fox
and CNN and America one News and Next
News Network and all the none of them
have even mentioned this as far as I
can tell.
The other group, which far as far as
I can tell, has almost double the numbers
of Hamas. How do you think that makes
sense? How can you argue we're fighting back
when they've called PIJ out for a long
time, Israel?
They always knew that this shoe could drop.
They knew that if they had to, they
can go, well, we have now that group
is doing things.
And now they're bombing them. Now we didn't
get a lot of coverage, but the point
is that this was very clearly something that
was always going to happen. So once, let's
just say they get rid of Hamas. Let's
say they make the deal and Hamas lays
the weapons down and marches away.
They're not gone?
You know, these are the kind of things
that frustrate me that we can make these
points, you know, years ago.
And because we don't get the traction we
deserve and people just got suppressed, the kind
of points that should trickle through the media,
Everyone should go, wait a minute. What about
that? It doesn't actually happen.
You knew this is a valid point, and
we said it a year ago. The reality
that this was always gonna be something that
happened. Now watch as it happens, and we'll
break out in the major channels. Good. Talk
about it. But just recognize how you knew
this a long time ago. And on top
of that, that this was something that didn't
even seem to happen.
That their claim, this militant was breaking of
doing this and doing that. From Robert's perspective,
it seemed to be a manufactured case in
the in in by and large. Now Robert
shared this tweet of mine,
and it got immediately censored. He got pulled
the whole thing got pulled down, and they
forced him to delete it.
Isn't that interesting? Now here's what I find
so fascinating about that. Why not just delete
my tweet? Because we're they're we're happily in
this suppression little corner right now where it's
getting four retweets on something that should be
a hell of a lot more, 3,000 views
on something that should get 75,000.
My point though is that Robert shares it,
who's been getting some pretty good reach lately,
and it instantly gets shut down, and now
he's talking about how his tweets are getting
any attention. It's it's just that we are
in this broken situation. So all that's to
be saying back to censorship is always there.
And at Roberts, by the way, on that
note, he had his YouTube channel taken down
yet again. It's just it never stops. But
Palestinian Islamic Jihad is a major part of
this that no one wants to get into
because I don't think they wanna chew to
drop just yet.
But in regard to the violated ceasefire,
Trey, who's not despite how having some cases
where he says things that I agree with,
is mainstream, and it shows it with things
like this. Hamas violated the ceasefire today
by attacking IDF soldiers in Rafa. No. That
was he's repeating the old story, and unless
he's lying about a new one that I
can't verify, he says I'm told by an
Israeli military official.
Right. More updates to incident to follow.
Zachary says, the IDF said it's most moral
army in the world. More updates on this
breaking development. I thought you were a journalist,
Ray. They're lying is the point, guys. They're
like they always have.
Look look. On top of everything,
Israel has violated the ceasefire, if you ever
would even call it that, every single day
since they pretended this started. So if they
did attack Rafan sold soldiers in Rafa, then
there wouldn't be a violation of anything seeing
as how they've been bombing the entire time.
So it's just insulting or kidnapping Palestinians like
we covered or attacking people in the West
Bank like we covered or restricting food like
we covered or not allowing them back to
their homes in any part outside that little
controlled area like we covered, despite that being
a violation of their agreement. We're funding ISIS
groups to steal everything and hurt people while
they're there in the toilet. It never stops.
But on top of that
oh, come on. Stupid.
Hold on.
I just can't read the title because I've
had to shrink the window. Israel's,
Israelis bristle as Trump makes clear who calls
the shots.
So what's interesting about this
yeah. She who calls the shots in the
Gaza truce?
So this is the Washington Post.
What I find really fascinating about this fascinating
is that so Trump comes out and, like,
blusters in front of American audiences. I'm in
control, and I make all the shots, and
then no. Then Israel literally ignores what they
say, but that never really comes to a
head because people that support Trump don't wanna
acknowledge that he just may got made look
like a fool. Trump will never point to
it because he doesn't want you to see
it. Happens every time, like this, for example.
So first, Israel's bristle when Israelis bristle when
Trump says that. They we're talking about random
Israelis online.
So here's what Trump said today.
So prime minister of Israel
today,
following security consultations,
prime minister Netanyahu has directed the military to
immediately carry out forceful strikes and Gaza Strip.
Yeah. Because they clearly care about the cease
fire. Now they've been doing that from day
one, guys. Didn't stop.
But here's what Trump has to say, and
I'll read you what Glenn writes about it.
Netanyahu, the prime minister has not gone so
far as to say the war is over.
In your view, is the war between Israel
and Hamas over? War is over.
The war is over. Do you understand that?
Yes. Thank you, Trump. Because that forceful effort
to scream. Isn't it funny? Like, he's this
is an effort to just be like, I'm
in control.
And it's to me, it stresses the opposite,
especially as as he's saying that they're killing
people in Gaza.
He must know that. Right? How embarrassing.
Are you confident that the ceasefire is going
to hold? I think so. I think it's
gonna hold.
A lot of reasons why it's gonna hold.
But Then The point for me was that,
you know, it's over. Like, ISIS is defeated.
Right? Just keep yelling the thing over and
over. Somebody in the chat saying they just
hit Al Sheaf again. I can't verify that,
but the point is they are bombing in
Gaza. That's very clear. So Trump comes out
and goes, it's over. We know, and we
said. Therefore, that means that you know? Okay.
Very forcefully yelling the thing he wants you
to think, and then Israel bombs Gaza. So
this is my point, guys. Is that done
like that on purpose?
Hard to say. But overall, the reality is
that Israel is bombing Gaza today. They made
that very clear.
Trump is out there acting like the war
is over because they both said so. Trump,
Glenn writes, like any US president, can say
whatever he wants about what Israel will or
should do. But Netanyahu knows that.
It's irrelevant.
And Israel will do whatever
Netanyahu wants, and The US will do nothing
about it. See, this is a person who's
paying attention,
who can see how long this has been
going on and how Trump will bluster and
act tough, and then Netanyahu will make him
look like a fool and nothing happens. They
do nothing about it because they don't want
you to even see it.
Kind of embarrassing, isn't it? And it says
despite the fact that The US pays for
all of it.
Okay.
Now Robert also reported today a massive wave
of Israeli air strikes have happened through Gaza.
He's confirming that. Israel has announced its intention
to reinvade
to areas it withdrew from in Gaza. Great.
So So now they effectively created stone pillars
that outline that yellow line area, which is
58% of Gaza, they claim. And now they're
gonna go right back to it and keep
pushing. Who didn't see that coming? So what
they've effectively done is created a new demarcation
line of where that yellow line is. They've
seized 60% of Gaza, which they already controlled
all all of it. Now they've actually got
boots in the ground. They forced them out.
They're getting shot if they go back. All
of this was a violation from day one.
They claim this is a response despite having
committed over a 100 ceasefire violations and blocking
aid from reaching civilians, as Robert writes.
Exactly.
Now,
also in the West Bank. So this is
what I really want you to recognize is
that in in the midst of all of
this, they're using this to expand out to
what was all if you listen to anybody
who's been telling you this from the beginning,
who's been watching this long before October 7,
this was always going to happen in the
West Bank because that is part of Palestine.
To those that might not recognize they're part
of the same thing, you're completely outside the
reality of this conversation. You've probably been trapped
in a post October 7 narrative, which how
in the world that's still the case today
is beyond me.
This is part of Palestine.
So any agreement they make with Palestinian, with
Hamas, or anybody is about all of it.
But it's even say you disagree with that.
The reason it was always gonna happen is
because the West Bank is a part of
Palestine and that Israel covets. Now I'm not
I'm not talking about Gaza style because it's
part of Israel proper, they argue, but they
don't want the Palestinian. They don't want the
West Bank idea. They want all of it
out of the way.
So here we are. Israel now conducts, as
they write first airstrike in the West Bank
in in months,
even though they've been doing it before that.
That's the point. In months. So it was
to always happen. But and kills three people
in the West Bank. Literally, airstrikes
in their own controlled territory. We're talking about
inside of Israel, guys. That's what the West
Bank is. Not Gaza controlled or rather, you
know, open air prison controlled style, but in
parts of the West Bank that are only
or in, you know, controlled Israel that are
only for Palestinians.
And they're bombing them.
I mean, this is this is effectively as
if Trump declared parts of New York terrorists,
you know, just started bombing parts of New
York. It's insane.
A militant group allied with Hamas confirmed the
deaths, which were part of an increase in
fighting in the Palestinian territory. All that really
means
is people in there not aligned with Israel.
For all we know, that could mean random
Palestinians. It could be Palestinian Islam Jihad for
all we know. Ultimately, all this means is
continuing the war against all of Palestine.
They said they've killed three
near Jenin. The attacks include an airstrike of
local security officials and was the first in
Palestinian territory in months.
Right. Local security officials inside of an area
they control. Like, they're these people are being
set up to fail. They're absolutely murdering Palestinian
people day by day in this location, and
it's not even a secret, guys. AG Plus,
Israel forces round up hundreds and hundreds of
Palestinians during mass arrests in the occupied West
Bank. This took place on September 11.
I
mean, come on, guys. I mean, this is
exactly what we saw in Gaza. They're they're
just literally duplicating this agenda, and it's going
after everybody who is Palestinian.
Multiple videos of the same kind of things
marching down these blindfolded grown men in in
lines down the street because they're Palestine.
Daniela from the eighth of this month points
out several Palestinians were rounded up last night
in detention campaign by the Israeli army. You
know why? Because as they were
going through the fake ceasefire operations, they're rounding
up more people like they've done every single
time before it.
And all you can just watch for yourself
is they just kidnap children and men and
women from their beds in the middle of
the night in West Bank.
Here,
security footage shows the moment Israeli occupation soldiers
encountered a group of Palestinian youths in West
Bank, with one soldier seen throwing a stun
grenade as they simply passed by. No war,
no threat, just Israeli terrorists attacking Palestinian youth
because they can.
Or at the very least, apartheid.
Right? They're just standing there.
They just drive by and just literally toss
a grenade at them.
K? Just because of who they are.
That's it. Move it along.
And that you know what that is, guys?
That's allowed. Like, that's why we see these
ridiculous IDF members dressing up in in
lingerie and stealing things because they literal in
fact, they even have a policy for it.
I forget what it's called, but arguably, if
if they don't do it there, they're gonna
come back and do it here. Like, that's
insane thinking. And so they allow them to
just be completely undisciplined.
They they are full of hatred and bigotry
and and
being driven by people full of the same.
And that's not every single person. Clearly, we
can see there are some anomalies. But overall,
we can close, see the Zionist led government
is the problem.
In the West Bank, Israel takes Palestinians from
their homes every single day.
No posts, no headline, no outrage. Every day
it happens.
Now this oh, that's this is the video
I was talking about. A leaked video in
2001 shows Netanyahu talking about how Israel intentionally
strikes Palestinians.
We must strike we must hit the Palestinians
hard. Take them to a state of panic
and fear, and the world will not say
anything.
How we deceive The US to break the
Oslo course. Now this is very public information
if you care to look. But more than
that, this clip goes on to make the
point about how we can manipulate the left
and the right of this government, and it's
all on record.
This account says Netanyahu
purposely
annexes the West Bank right now as we
speak and further proof that Netanyahu isn't seeking
peace at all. This is part of the
Greater Israel Project that he tags Donald Trump.
Nobody cares. He's allowing it, guys. Let's not
forget.
More than one example, but this is just
with what Miriam agreed or what he agreed
for Miriam in order to take the money,
Miriam Allison,
to be elected the first place.
Trump is desperate for her cash. Her condition,
West Bank annexation.
Not a
secret. Now
let's get into
Robert's very excellent breakdown
of what he argues as the master plan.
The real master plan
that they're pointing to was always the plan
inside Trump administration's
master plan for the Gaza regime change.
And I do I think this is
it's just so dark how obvious this is.
It truly is. And I wanna go through
this in general.
He says on October 10, the latest Gaza
ceasefire was officially declared.
Now, the reason I I hesitate when I
wrote that when I when I was editing
it till I put quotes on that, because
it clearly was never really a ceasefire. But
the point is that there was an agreement
on paper that was a ceasefire. So it
is fair to say that there was a
ceasefire, like an agreement made.
Israel never uphold upheld their part of the
bargain.
That's it. So, yes, they did have their
latest ceasefire officially declared,
but Israel didn't care about that. Now it
says according to the plan, phase one of
the ceasefire, which I always point out this
is how they do this in order to
make it easier to manipulate, that you could
just end it with one agreement. They really
could.
And how Hamas has more than one pushed
that forward and Israel has more than once
turned it down as even times of Israel
has covered more than once.
Now it says, on phase one of the
ceasefire was supposed to include a full secession
of hostilities.
The mutual exchange of captives on both sides,
the pledges for at least 400
humanitarian aid trucks to enter the besieged coastal
territory for five days and an unlimited number
afterwards,
which 400 itself
is below the 500 marker from before this
started post October 7. So even that, which
was with they deliberately started there knowing they
were never gonna allow more, which may guarantee
they would never even have a blip over
the 500 mark, so guaranteed they would continue
to starve. That's the reality of this. The
data has been clear from before October 7.
The 500 a day plus fuel was already
at a level that people were dangerously food
insecure.
Ending below that, it's gonna make that worse.
It's pretty obvious.
Of course, acknowledging the first couple of weeks
post October 7, they went bent down to
basically zero. That's why people are in famine
level and have been for a long time
according to, you know, the experts on famine
as opposed to the Zionist screaming online because
they know better. You know? From day one,
Israel not only violated the ceasefire agreement
through shooting dead a number of Palestinian civilians,
but also unleashed a range of Palestinian collaborator
militias
to begin targeting Gaza's local security forces.
Hamas, as the governing force inside the Gaza
Strip, decided to redeploy
some 7,000 police and security officers to the
streets of the war ravaged territory attempting to
restore order after its forces were prevented from
operating during Israel's relentless bombardments.
Although Israel's own forces have directly murdered over
a 100 Palestinian civilians
since the start of the ceasefire,
it had declared decided, excuse me, to switch
its strategy on October 10 to using proxy
forces to do its bidding instead of its
own soldiers.
The insidious plot or its master plan has
been
that has been in the works over the
past two years, as US Envoy Stephen Witkoff
admitted during a recent interview in sixty Minutes,
was also also involves carving up Gaza into,
cantons ruled by separate forces. Now this I
found very interesting. We discussed this with this
interview, by the way,
with Dave DeCamp, we'll get to in a
minute,
where he made this point. So what my
argument early, which we'll get to in these
as well,
not early, but, you know, before we first
started getting into this part of the conversation,
was that I get the sense that Netanyahu
or whoever the power structures are trying to
swap out
the the excuse of Hamas for something new.
Now whether that's letting them rule for something
different, calling them Hamas, or pretending that is
Hamas in the sense of them attacking civilians,
or or, you know, however you play this
out. The ISIS linked gangs,
I very much got the sense was what
they were using to transition away from using
Hamas.
And remember, they were the ones that were
stealing aid. Look. You'll get into in the
article. But his point is that as Dave
as Dave also acknowledged that they were allowing
these groups to essentially roll rule parts of
the Gaza in the yellow zone.
Weirdly,
just like in Yemen, where you have the
Al Qaeda controlled zones within the Saudi Arabia
controlled area, or weirdly in Syria, where you
have ISIS controlled territories within The US controlled
area. Guys, this is not a mirage. It's
not a secret. It's obvious. They work with
these groups. It shouldn't even be hard to
acknowledge today. The point on this overlap
is where was I? The
oh, the so right now, in the new
budding version of the same old thing they
do everywhere, you now have them taking over
this area. Or even even better, in Syria,
they literally handed over control to that group.
It's just how it's incredible how obvious that
is. And so now, you have a situation
where you're giving ISIS linked groups control of
parts of Gaza, which how does that not
come back to like, either Israel will later
use them as excuse to further annihilate things
in the area, or they'll be used to
argue that they are Hamas and they're letting
them take control when really they're getting rid
of every Palestinian they can, or maybe they
just use them to say that's who should
rule so they can momentarily act like they're
working with Palestine. I I don't know. But
none of that
is what Palestinians want, which matters. Secondarily, is
it what in the interest of any Palestinian?
Anywhere you look. So it's important to think
about that. They're already giving ISIS groups part
of or linked groups control of parts of
Gaza.
It says this plot is a strategy for
a multilayered scheme that will seek to effect
regime change and in its worst iteration means
the taxpayer will foot the bill, you, for
another multinational war of aggression.
The goal being the completion
of the objectives Israel failed to achieve through
its own military operations.
In order to fully understand the scheme, all
of the relevant factors must be explored. Now
under ceasefire violations,
as mentioned above, the Israelis had agreed upon
letting
a set number of humanitarian aid trucks enter
the, enter Gaza on day one of the
supposed ceasefire. Originally, that number they said was
400 for the first five days, and then
it was supposed to go up. And it
says they they even agreed to allow 600
trucks
to enter on that first part of the
phase, which so that'd be a 100 over
the 500 limit, which is a positive step,
but a very small one if it's especially
only for one day out to see what
happened, which is the amount required to begin
ensuring a population can access the bare minimum
required under international law. Now the reason he
says that is because the 500 was the
status quo that they created, which was creating
food insecurity.
At the moment,
the international argument is, like, at a minimum,
600 has to be coming through to, like,
work back the situation. And even then, people
will die for a period of time before
they can even, you know, like, we've talked
about many times over the year, over the
years with
situations of mass starvation.
People, even if given food, may not survive
because of how severe it has become. So
that's what they demand.
And it says, instead, though, after agreeing to
that, Israel's allowed an average of 99,
aid trucks to enter Gaza each day since
it began. So 400 was the agreement for
the first days and it was supposed to
increase after that. Then they go, Yeah, we'll
give you 600 for the first five days
anyway. And then just didn't do that.
So, you see how this works? And then
Witkoff and Jared and Trump and everybody else
comes out and goes, The deal that is
real. But that's not even what's happening. Let
alone even actually initiated since they're bombing, but
they don't even agree to the use the
the part they have to verify. That then
you get the UN that comes out and
goes, they're only 90 trucks. And Israel goes,
they're stopping at Hamas. And it just it
never ends.
So
they're lying to you. They only did 90
instead. And it says, while at least 6,000
trucks remain in limbo waiting at these crossing
points for the Israeli approval to transport their
desperately needed medical and food aid along with
other essential items.
This has been going on for over a
year and a half. As part of the
initial phase of the Gaza ceasefire agreement, the
Israelis were supposed to withdraw to what is
known as the yellow line inside of the
territory,
And it's the image for those not on
the podcast.
In an approach that was intended to result
in an eventual with full withdraw
of their forces from the besieged enclave. The
area in which Israel was supposedly set to
remain was actually 53%
of Gaza. Yet on the ground ended up
being about 58%, a statistic that hasn't really
been independently verified. Now it could be more
than that.
My point, which I can't seem to get
very like, this is why this is done
this way, why you can have, like, an
eight point plan on Trump's side and a
five point plan on Netanyahu's side. And they
go, well, just agree, and we'll work out
the detail. No. That they're designed to fail.
The reality is that they're not agreeing to
the same things. They're not even executing the
same things. And so, in this case,
my point was they were supposed to, and
you could read it the deal, allowed Palestinians
to go back to their homes in the
North, in the South,
anywhere where they had been pushed away from.
Now, the yellow line was what Israel simply
was arguing they put in place to ensure
that they could help build back in the
controlled area behind them, not that they were
gonna restrict access to people's homes.
And then what they do, they shot anybody
coming near them, and they said, they're trying
to rush us at the line.
They knew what they were doing. They're creating
there's the narrative that will make it sound
like Palestinians are doing the wrong thing when
what they did inherently violated the agreement. That
was a core part of it.
So that's what that became.
Meanwhile, we're suppressing aid, kidnapping people, still bombing,
you know, the whole thing. According to the
deep, to BBC verify, which we should never
blindly trust, any of these places,
Israeli forces were, in fact, confirmed
through geo geolocation tools to be operating hundreds
of meters deeper into Gaza territory than even
the yellow line that they permitted, which was
60%.
Right? So they take more than they should.
They don't allow them to cross that. And
then they still venture into the areas they
claim are, you know, not the safe areas
and kill people because that's what they do
the entire time. And even BBC, who's historically
been on their side, is going, yeah, we
confirmed that they were, in fact, crossing that
line. Any number of these things are violations
of the ceasefire.
Israel has, of course, continued murdering Palestinian civilians
on a daily basis, sometimes through drone gunfire,
oftentimes through bombardment,
and in different instances due to direct sniper
fire from Israeli soldiers themselves.
The worst day of killing and this is
as of he wrote this, by the way,
which was
came out on the twenty fifth.
You know, I believe there have been much
more than that since then.
The worst day of the killing by far
occurred last Sunday when Israel carried out a
100 airstrikes, killing at least 44
civilians,
while Benjamin Netanyahu later bragged about dropping a
153
tons of bombs on Gaza.
This bombing occurred
after
two Israeli soldiers were killed and three Israeli
settlers sustained injuries when they ran over an
unexploded
ordinance.
And this is what Robert found out himself.
And this was backed up by,
Brent Grim, Dropsite News, and a few others.
Instead of initially admit admitting this, the Israeli
military concocted a fabricated story about Hamas fighters
firing an RPG warhead at their soldiers.
Not only did this lead to a breakdown
in the ceasefire, which was already being violated,
to such a degree that even Israeli media
reported the agreement had collapsed.
It also represented a major cover up of
yet another ceasefire violation by Israel.
It says despite claiming to have halted all
military operations, the Israeli army continues to carry
out demolition work against the remaining Palestinian civilian
infrastructure in the areas behind its yellow line.
I mean, think about this, guys. They're claiming
they're rebuilding,
but but in doing so, what they're doing
is destroying everything that's left to rebuild. That's
not what they want. If you're claiming to
do this for Palestinians, which let's not forget,
are not even included in the agreement, there's
not a place for them in any of
this. And they're all acting like this is
a a peace deal for Palestine.
It's just so gross. It makes me so
angry that there are people out there that
are are you know, it's more so to
the ones that know they're misrepresenting it, like
the ones we point out. What it says
even more controversial is that it continues to
employ many Israeli civilian contractors
from the private sector who are paid daily
rates by the Israeli Defense Ministry of up
to 900 US dollars. An entire blood money
demolition industry has developed in Israel that has
continued since the ceasefire,
one that costs an average of $30,000,000
per month that you are paying for America,
and the reality is they're just destroying the
rest of Palestinian
homes. Who cares if they've got possessions inside
those homes? Who cares if they tried to
make it better? Who cares if there's places
where people are still in there because they
can't flee, because they have no legs, or
because they're in a
I just it's over the top.
As over 60,000 Israeli businesses businesses have closed
since October 7. And while the economy is
in general has taken enormous hits, basically collapsing
at this point in very, very real ways,
propped up by the obvious,
this
new demolition industry provides jobs
and fund injections into Israeli businesses. Israel is
now demarcating its yellow line with cement blocks
and security equipment behind which it carries out
its demolition operations. Remember, they're now bombing again
today in the areas to which they push
them into.
And it says, if you look and again,
to be just so you didn't miss that,
they've been bombing all time. But this is
them now publicly saying we're gonna begin, which
means it's gonna be far worse.
It says, if you look at Israel's refusal
to allow a sufficient aid into Gaza, its
violation of the yellow line with Dromed agreement,
along with its continuation of military operations
and its inability to actually cease fire,
it is it's clear that it does not
take US Donald Trump president Donald Trump's 20
plan seriously.
That's the point. Right? They'll never say that.
But if you look at the facts,
they don't care what Trump says. They do
whatever they want, and Trump doesn't call it
out. Who has the upper hand in that
situation? And it says to say the least.
Or at at as we will later establish,
they are using the so called peace deal
as a carefully calibrated plot
aimed at achieving a specific set of war
goals under the cover of a ceasefire,
possibly both. So far, the only ones to
have actually ceased fire, and you can easily
verify this, are the Palestinian armed factions.
See, this is what it frustrates people that
wanna like, the reality of everything we've shown
you, even now admitted by Donald Trump, was
that they were the ISIS linked gangs that
were either shooting Palestinians
or that Hamas were firing on and did
kill them. Trump admitted that. And then in
the Knesset, again,
you can have them publicly
admitting that who they're arming and working with
are actually ISIS linked gangs. That is in
the major Hazrat's newspaper.
The point is,
whose personnel are affiliated with ISIS,
the gangs they're working with in Gaza. Netanyahu
said, what's wrong with that?
Not a secret. I'm included as always. It's
just crazy how many people ignore the facts
in front of them.
And
it says
Oh, where were we? Yeah.
So far, they've had to actually the Palestinian
armed forces are the ones that have actually
stopped firing on Israel. ISIS linked proxy strategy.
Now since the Israeli invasion of the Rafah
crossing between Egypt and Gaza, 05/06/2024,
bombing it since October 7,
or had bombed it on that day forward,
Israel has adopted
a strategy of weaponizing aid looting gangsters,
bringing them under their direct control and repurposing
them for direct military and political agendas. We've
been trying to call attention to this for
a while now.
Not only was Israel manufacturing
famine
at its top human rights group, but as
its top human rights group, B'Tselem, has accused
it of. And I mean, I have the
image right here, actually. I mean, this
is B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights platform saying,
look, this is famine they're committing. Same too
with the IPC and literally every famine expert
in the world, but let's keep listening to
Zionist online. But it says, and using these
criminal groups to block the entrance of aid
in order to blame it on Hamas. Also
but it also began working on building a
military force that it would later employ to
work against Hamas
and other Palestinian groups resisting Israel. So you
see, it's like they're setting this up to
create the new dynamic that will keep the
set the status quo that they need continuing,
at least as far as they want it
to. It says there are now three primary
groups of militant collaborators
organizations. Remember these. They are located in the
Gaza Strip. Each wing of this anti Hamas
coalition of these Israeli backed death squads is
responsible for managing a different turf.
Operating out of the Eastern Rafah is the
armed gang calling itself the Popular Forces. They
can't even seem to make new names for
half these things. It's all, like, the same
kind of English overlap to what they want.
Freedom something. You know? But it says led
by convicted drug trafficker. The main one I
would argue is ISIS affiliate, Yasser Abu Shehbab.
Following the Israeli seizure of the Rafah crossing
on the '20 in 05/06/2024,
this force began receiving overt backing from Israel
to carry out coordinated armed robberies of humanitarian
aid trucks heading into Gaza,
making it the main and original
collaborator organization following October 7. And this is
the group that we're using to claim that
Hamas was stealing all this aid. That's why
they kept getting caught, like, in regard to
what the the narrative they videos they would
show and they or the flower massacre. Like,
these this was coordinated.
Says the so called popular forces, a newer
name for the group that had previously operated
in the shadows and solely focused on stealing
humanitarian aid. Under Israeli supervision,
inside territory considered an active kill zone for
anyone other than the Israelis and coordinated aid
truck entities, the militants would demand $4,000 bribes
from humanitarian organizations or they would seize the
aid. Now in case you missed the main
point, they're doing this in a location that
only Israel controls.
That's what I was saying. How long did
I say that right in the beginning? You're
talking about a middle ground that Israel secures,
and you're claiming that they can't it's not
it's not like it's growing into Gaza and
getting seized upon. They're the ones grabbing this
before it can even reach them and selling
at higher prices. It was always there, guys.
While civilians in Gaza were suffering severe malnutrition
and lacked the ability to get their hands
on medical supplies, clean water, shelter, food,
Abu Shebaab's men were hoarding the aid and
living under twenty four hour Israeli military protection
in Eastern Rafah. They stockpiled the stolen aid
and then drip fed it to the black
market where civilians were forced to pay exorbitant
prices for the bare necessities.
Later in 2024, however, Yasser Abu Shebaab was
directed to change his ISIS linked gang's image,
sort of like Jelani. Right? A project that
western mainstream media aided him in. Now realize
there was an overlap to this. They felt
like it was working to some degree, even
though I don't think it really was, in
Syria. So they said, hey. Let's just
turn this guy into the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
He can be feeding people instead of raping
and torturing them.
Suddenly, in the Israeli end, corporate media began
presenting Abu Shebaab and his gang of criminals
as a grassroots anti Hamas opposition force, like
in Syria. Guys, this is what they do.
The western media's face slipped. Now, really, before
I move forward, that's what Israel does. And
then you should understand that's why that's what
US did in Israel's wars all around the
world. The Western media's face lift
to a band of drug dealers, sal Salafist
militants, and murderers had begun. Then during the
Gaza ceasefire that began in January
2025,
Tel Aviv supplied Abu Shehbab's men with Israeli
tactical vests, helmets, badges, weapons, and vehicles. After
Israel decided to collapse the ceasefire in March,
the so called Popular Forces were officially born.
This is not hard to recognize, guys. I
mean, you you think Israel's gonna be giving
them their work? I mean, the the point
is that now you can prove all of
this. That's why this has come before. They
were Robert was reporting this long before we
got here. Now that they've pushed them into
the spotlight, you can now prove all of
this. It says on July 24, the Wall
Street Journal even published an article entitled Gazans
are Finished with Hamas,
which they claim was written by Yasser Abu
Shehbab. We pointed this out. However, this promotional
piece for the ISIS linked aid looting death
squad could not have been written by Abu
Shabaab,
not only because he doesn't speak English, but
because he's reportedly illiterate in Arabic too. So
either they literally, like, invited him in and
wrote and, like, so not as a stenographer,
like, let him read out what they would
write and then publish what this ISIS linked
gangster was saying, which is insane in and
of itself. More so, it seems that they
can Israel concocted a propaganda tool, like they
did with Syria or anywhere else you could
make these cases. Or, you know,
I always forget the girl's name. That little
girl they were using in Syria or the
Oman kid they use in the back of
the back of the ambulance that they dressed
up with makeup, and they literally prove that.
Just it's just so wild how long this
could be so clear. And yet, you know,
again, it's because the people in the status
quo are invested in maintaining it.
The so called Popular Forces were even collaborating
with the American private military contractor led Gaza
Humanitarian
Foundation. Remember, this is the American,
Green Beret. Tony,
was it Aguilar?
This is him talking about this on many
different podcasts where he said they were we
were literally retell to kill children. Like, they
were I mean, they claimed he was making
it all up, but, guys, there's just so
much you can ignore. Only so much you
could ignore. Only so many IDF whistleblowers and
so many military personnel. And and I mean,
every position you could possibly look at from
US to Israeli to international media. I mean,
everyone at some point has broken off. People
of the state department resign in protest because
we can't allow this to continue.
Only so much you could ignore.
But it says, which was labeled by Goshen's
as a death trap because it was. They
were executing people coming for food. And that's
what he told you. Where around a 1,500
civilians were murdered after being lured towards food,
after being deprived of any aid for three
months.
There was even a plot for Abu Shebaab's
men to be used to rule over a
concentration camp in Southern Gaza, one constructed by
Israel and into which it had planned to
herd the population, but that didn't span didn't
pan out. Remember, they were really pushing for
that little controlled area. That's what they were
doing. So you can literally prove this stuff
today, who they're working with, what they're connected
to, and how desperate they are to make
this the case.
Later in August, another group propped up by
Khan Yunus in Khan Yunus, excuse me, called
itself the counterterrorism
strike force. And it's it's led by Hussam
al Aztal, a former member of the Palestinian
Authority's preventative security forces. You see right there,
they'd go see Palestine.
It's not the case, guys. The PA is
not working for Palestine.
It says its intelligence branch
its intelligence branch,
that's the the name the the PSF is
their intelligence branch, who has long been linked
with the Israeli Shin Bet.
Alright? So the the the the,
like, the m, e, m, or i's type
stuff. Right? They'll frame them. Go look at
the Palestinian groups. But you it takes half
a second to find out that the not
every Palestinian is working on behalf of the
Palestinians. Just like you can't just in, like,
any situation.
It says the CSF have been accused of
raiding hospitals, killing civilians, stealing aid, and looting
homes. The Palestinian group we're talking about. But
their primary role has been to launch raids
against Palestinian resistance fighters. So, what you really
have is a group probably not consisting of
only Palestinians, of a group that they tell
you as Palestinians who ultimately are conducting things
for Israel.
That's not unique.
Earlier this year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
was forced to admit that his backing of
these ISIS linked gangs after Israeli Knesset member,
Avigdor Lieberman, criticized the public strategy, called it
out in front of the Knesset, which that's
where he said, what's wrong with that? And
accused him of violating national security by pointing
it out.
On October, September 17, Haretz covered this, confirmed
that it was Israeli support extended well beyond
just arming the militants and that they were
given orders directly from the Israeli chain of
command.
Fact.
The Israeli media outlet even interviewed officers who
expressed their disapproval of the use of these
militants. Like, so it's like open conversation in
everywhere but The US media apparatus because they're
clearly not controlling what they do. And we're
out of control. It says,
Israeli
leaders,
officers
expressed the disapproval of these militants as they
were out of control and potentially posed a
threat even to Israeli military objectives.
See, this is important to rep this is
a a kind of a collapsing
situation.
Now it says both the popular forces and
CSF are directly connected with one another. Both
are granted cash, weapons, and control of territory
under Israeli supervision
in exchange for attacking Hamas on their behalf.
Then came a new Israeli backed militia
with the beginning of Israel's Operation
Gideon's Chariot two, otherwise known as the failed
attempt to occupy Gaza City. This militia is
led by Ashraf
Mansi,
calling itself the People's Army Northern Forces.
The territory in which the Northern Gaza death
squads operated was Jebeliah,
Bet Lahaya, and and areas inside Gaza City.
During the Israeli military's reinvasion of Northern Gaza,
these militants, along with members of certain clans,
had carried out numerous operations against Palestinian resistance
factions and collaborated with Israel to seize control
of territory under Israel's protection.
Now any moment, like, these any one of
these moments could have been used to say,
see, that's what the Palestinians are doing. Like,
they tried to blame the the
gangs for what they claim Hamas was doing
during the ceasefire. But, see, as these groups
were taking these areas, they could argue that
wasn't them. That's how this
works. Now for whatever reason, they've just done
this very bluntly. But at the end of
the day, that this is not this hasn't
played out all the way yet. These groups
are taking control of certain areas right now
in Gaza.
It says, The United Nations reported back in
August that all of the aid trucks entering
Gaza that 88%,
88%
were being looted by these gangs.
Yet upon the initial implementation of the so
called last ceasefire,
when these three militant groups withdrew,
this is very important,
behind
Israel's yellow line, which
speaks for itself, guys, the Israel controlled area
that the ISIS linked gangs retreated behind once
this supposedly took place. Right? Once the ISIS
linked gangs
were treated
and were hiding under their protection of Israel,
the looting
suddenly disappeared.
Everyone testified to that and the return of
Hamas aligned government security forces to the streets.
According to UN affiliated agencies and humanitarian aid
organizations.
Unfortunately, looting then proceeded to take place again
when Israel began to implement its true ceasefire
agenda properly.
Right? Organizing its collaborators to carry out a
key part of the duty to help starve
Gaza and civilian civilian population through aid theft.
So the moment that you can clearly prove
when these ISIS linked gangs pulled away, you
had a moment where aid was actually coming
in. They didn't want that, so suddenly they
come back in. That's where you have the
argument of these gangs claiming Hamas. I mean,
it's just all so obvious to verify.
Now as always, I'm not saying you can't
prove that or rather,
I would say to say it more accurately.
I'm not saying that there is no possible
example where Hamas could have violated ceasefire or
that Hamas as an individual part of the
group might have gone out and done something
that you could I mean, that's obvious to
me. It's not in my interest to make
that case right now. Like, if we could
prove it, what I'm saying is to argue
anything's possible is not why I mean, that
it it pulls from the point. If I
had evidence that showed a Moss was violating
the ceasefire, I would report it to you
like I have in the past. Right now,
this is what we have. And all you
have is the Israeli government yelling a narrative
that we can prove is false, like we
have seen a 100 times so far.
So understand that. It's very important to think
about. And so what we can see is
them using these groups to make that case.
So like the same point from before, if
it was just as obvious they want you
to think it is, they wouldn't need to
manufacture
obvious
deviations, poise. Now since from day one of
the ceasefire, Israel unleashed its ISIS linked militias
and collaborative groups against Gaza security forces.
Carrying out raids, assassinations, armed robberies against civilians,
and gunning down innocent people. Now even then,
they would point to the engagement with the
gangs as saying, here's Hamas enforcing against the
Palestinians.
They did it back then. We tried to
call it out then as well. In reaction
to this,
Hamas mobilized two security units created especially to
deal with the ISIS linked gangs. Called them,
in English, arrow unit and the resistance security
force,
which is in again, in that'd be the
English. So arrow unit and the resistance security
force. I think that's the English version of
their terms, along with other elements of its
domestic security forces. So roll these guys out
to push back against the ISIS linked gangs
at what they're claiming anyway. Now it says
the results were the arrest of countless collaborators,
clashes resulting in high casualties among the Israeli
backed groups, and in public execution of collaborators
carried out on film. So
even Robert's reporting that the execution that they
played said it was innocent Palestinians
were people that were part of the ISIS
linked gangs that were working for Israel. Now
you can look into the information. I think
we've already given you enough to make that
case very clear, but question it. Do your
own due diligence. Pro Israel propagandists use this
chaos along with the videos of these executions
as proof of tyrannical crackdown,
claiming Hamas was killing its own people and
that the civil war was aloof or excuse
me, afoot.
The videos of the public execution against captured
collaborators along with a number of videos circulating
of captured Israeli backed fighters being beaten with
metal rods were addressed by Hamas officials to
have been carried out by its elements who
had taken matters into their own hands. So
but the point is even these are examples
of, I guess, what these referring to as
the Israeli backed fighters being I mean, what's
interesting to me is you have
a war going on,
and even then, you shouldn't need to explain
while you're fighting the other side. But even
then, Hamas comes out and says, well, that
wouldn't have happened if they didn't do it,
which you could take. They could be lying.
But I just find it an interesting like,
it seems one of two things. Throughout this
whole process, post October 7, Hamas has either
decided that it's obviously in their interest to
constantly project that they're not what they are
or what they say they are,
or they're not what they say they are.
I mean, it's not hard to break this
down. But either way, they have continued to
the the hostages come back and say they
treat us kindly, took us out for playdates
at the ocean, took us shopping. Both of
those are very real.
Guarded their own bodies with their bodies. You
know, you can't make this stuff up. So,
anyway, to reiterate the point, the videos of
all of that, the executions and so on,
of Israel backed fighters being beaten with metal
rods as well, were addressed by the Hamas
officials
to have been carried out by the elements
who had taken matters into their own hands.
Do you think Israel's
team,
their military Netanyahu, will explain
why they beat up a bunch of Hamas
members?
It's just an odd thing. Isn't it interesting
to point out? But it says whether this
is true or not, that's fair to point
out. These actions helped lead to multiple families
whose members had begun to fight against the
authorities to hand over their weapons and condemn
condemn those amongst them that collaborated with Israel.
My point is just that at the end
of the day,
Israel has shown you what they do with
people that they even guess might be working
with decide they don't like, and then put
them in prison for twenty years and torture
and rape them. That's what we're actually talking
about. What we are seeing in Gaza is
at this moment is what we are seeing
in Gaza is at this moment damn it.
I gotta remember to hold on.
That's on me. That's me missing something right
there.
What we are seeing in Gaza
is, at this moment, not a battle between
the security forces and a number of Gazan
clans, but instead is limited to a fight
between Israeli proxy groups and the Palestinian resistance
factions.
That's what we're dealing with, guys. Like, so
there are very clearly Palestinian,
you know, Palestinian support groups and then what
Israel's doing, and they're battling while trying to
claim like it's something else. That's what Robert's
telling you. Now the master plan, it says,
while The US Israeli agenda in Gaza began
rearing its head from the outset, the agenda
is now clearly manifesting itself on the ground
and has been openly confessed to piece by
piece in the public domain. Don't forget that
they just told you they've been planning this
well before.
Now it says part of the plan, the
Trump plan. Oh, you know what? I'll grab
this really quickly too. I hope this pops
up.
There it is. Look at that. So I
did this interview with Robert
long time ago before we were he was
working with TLF.
This is 07/05/2020.
And this was kind of right before actually.
I think we we overlapped over the next
year or so. But what this was about,
I I made that picture, by the way.
I thought that's just a weird lens.
The steel of the century, as he called
it, and normalizing an openly violent ethno state.
Robert did a documentary called the steel of
the century,
literally outlining how Trump's deal of the century,
which is exactly what they're trying to do
now, was just deploy. It was just the
same old thing called something else, and we
broke it down. It's a really important one
you should watch. It's a great interview. Robert
has some really powerful work, always has. But
it's interesting to think about how long this
has been going on. It's not new post
2023.
But
part of the Trump plan, my point is
the same one from before, which I probably
should put that in there, has been the
idea of introducing a multinational
coalition force under the Gaza Strip under Israeli
supervision
in order to support implementing
the overarching agenda. I would argue that means
greater Israel.
The US Secretary of State, Mike Ru
Marco Rubio,
excuse me,
says that he's pushing to receive UN approval
for the initiative and that it would be
happening as soon as possible,
Like that's going to happen and like they
care.
They'll do it regardless. Like they have every
single time before it. They don't need UN.
I mean, here's you know what's funny about
this? It seems like they're this is such
a feign move to make you think things.
Like, you think they're gonna get UN approval
before they even try to get congressional approval?
This is The US Government, and they've not
even tried to get approval from Congress, which
makes all of their military actions a crime,
but they're gonna, we're going after UN approval.
They don't care about any of these things.
But wait, isn't isn't UN Hamas?
Did you tell us that? I'll come back
to that in a second. It says US
vice president JD Vance admitted earlier in the
week
that the so called international security force, the
the the their true mission will be to
disarm Hamas.
Remember, Trump is the one that allowed them
to arm. My bill will bring that up
real quickly.
What was it?
There it is. Surprised. I remember that.
I think this is super important because this
is not getting much attention. It's on the
thirteenth. Doesn't Trump doesn't imply. He says it
out outright, and I'll show you the the
point. Trump implies Hamas given approval to act
as police force for a period of time.
This is important because this is being used
primarily as this division. Trump says, well, Hamas
is standing because they want because they do
want to stop the problems, and they've been
open about it. And we gave them approval
for a period of time.
That's not hard to recognize, guys. So, that's
Trump telling you before they made this fake
ceasefire that they allowed them to be the
security force. That's why what you saw was
them pull them back, Hamas came out and
rolled out their 7,000 security forces. Right? This
was all planned, in my opinion. And then
they were like, they won't disarm. Hamas is
in control. And that was the entire point
from the beginning, despite the fact that twice
Hamas was offered to remove themselves entirely and
twice The US and Israel reinserted them back
in the deal. That was we have all
covered that months ago because they need Hamas
as the scapegoat in this conversation. But you
need to understand that he gave them this
approval. So as they now fret over the
idea that they're still being armed and this
there wasn't even like a time that they
outlined or it's like the body's point. They
know the way they're playing this to make
it look like they're violating when they are
the ones that set this up to begin
with. So here.
Where were we here? It says that the
forces will their main mission will be to
disarm Hamas.
So if that's the case, then why wouldn't
you just have included that in the first
place? Like the and that's what it what
Hamas had even offered before.
So they're making this as if they're the
ones refusing to do what's part of the
deal. This is although Vance maintains that US
forces will only act as supervisors.
Does anybody ever buy these lies anymore in
any field of war or any context? Oh,
we're just standing there observing.
That's just insulting to your intelligence. They don't
do that anywhere. On top of that, most
of these cases where they're observing are their
active participants. They just lie to make that
somehow, like, they're yeah. Like, really to make
it seem like they're not taking apart.
But that's what you know, Trump's is really
especially today, he acts like he's some kind
of third party,
not completely immersed in the actual agenda, like
the genocide here or that any number of
fields of war. Syria, for example. I'm just
trying to help them resolve it. No. You're
literally the as one of the central players,
like Biden
was or whoever was tying issues for him.
It says, although Vance maintains that they'll be
supervising forces,
they there he says, as will act as
supervisors to to to the force, and he
says there won't be direct boots on the
ground. That's already a lie. It was a
lie before he said that. This is by
no means promise.
Regardless, The US taxpayer
will now foot the bill for The US
Israel led international invasion force that is being
proposed to fight against Hamas.
They say, organize this to go this way,
and now you taxpayers in The United States
are gonna pay for yet another totally America
first agenda.
In other words, he writes, this international force
will be a multinational
regime change army that is used to achieve
what Israel couldn't during its two year long
genocide in the Gaza Strip. Foreign soldiers will
be sent to fight and die in other
in order to continue the genocide.
Now you think this just like the National
Guard for it, you think it's gonna dissipate?
No. No. This will become a security force.
It'll become a presence that needs to be
there. Look at, like, the North Korea lines.
Like, this will be a forever reality that's
exploited by people like the US government in
Israel. And what that will mean most likely
is you now, of course, they'll be deployed
to go after other countries Israel doesn't like.
Probably Lebanon after that. How much you wanna
bet?
Meanwhile, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff have made
it clear that the reconstruction in Gaza will
only take place in the areas currently under
the control of Israel. And, of course, it's
ISIS linked extremist militias. So they're gonna rebuild
all these arrows back here, not allow them
to go back to their homes, and then
what, swap with them? Like, in what world
does this ever make sense when the people
they claim they're doing it all for aren't
even allowed to go back there or are
being pushed out entirely or that they still
tell you are all terrorists.
The goal, it says according to anonymous sources
speaking with Axios, is to give Palestinian civilians
an alternative.
Either live under extremist collaborators, like the people
they're propping up, like your ISIS linked groups
that work for Israel.
So, extremist Calabrio's or Israel occupying forces. So
either live under that
or remain inside the areas where Hamas still
maintains control,
likely arguing from that point forward that this
then demonstrate their support for terrorism.
Right? So, you're it's like the COVID choice.
You're giving somebody a false choice. You're saying
move over here and live under different occupation,
which represents just the same thing that's happening
before, but now with ISIS elements on top
of that, or stay in the areas that
we've said Hamas is in, and then we'll
de facto call everyone their terrorist and then
continue to kill everybody. It's not hard to
see how this works.
As this plan develops, the population of Gaza
who live under the rule of Hamas are
being deliberately starved, and scores of them are
routinely killed. Over a hundred and seventy thousand
people are currently injured that we can prove,
re,
rendering many of them in need of medical
intervention and care that's simply not even possible
right now in Gaza,
which could be weaponized against them. It already
has been. Small things like cuts and infections
are killing people, guys.
As for the so called phase two of
the ceasefire deal that keeps being discussed in
the corporate media, which at this point today
seems to be not even on the table
anymore.
There are no actual signs of progress in
that regard. I don't think they ever intended
to. Hamas did not agree to disarm,
nor has any other of this of some
dozen Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza. That's my
point from before about Palestine
Islamic Jihad. Well, Hamas can disarm, but then
you've always more than one other group. You
really think that's gonna not be the scapegoat
problem next? Obviously.
And it says, asserting that they will also
do so if there's a Palestinian state established.
That's for all of them.
Establish a Palestinian state, and that's where the
transition will begin. And then they argue that
we need to do all of this before
we can do that. And they continue to
make it seem like they're refusing their own
state. It's just not what's happening. It says
during which their men will be integrated into
the national security military forces as their weapons
are handed over to the state. They'll never
agree to that because they'll always say it's
the group that we don't want to be
in charge, but democracy
at the end of the day, this was
always a set up to fail. The group
that you wanna say you don't wanna work
with has to be removed, but you need
to make a deal with that group to
achieve that end.
It's comically stupid. It has been from the
very beginning. Now, it says,
Israel, for its part, is adamant that it
will not agree to a Palestinian state. And
always has been despite the lies over the
years or even discussions regarding a process toward
it. It making it clear that they seek
the total destruction of all Palestinian
armed groups or just all of Palestine.
Now it says the
the positions of Israel and Hamas are in
reconcile irreconcilable
by design. Now that's really from one side
of this because Hamas has been, you know,
from the beginning, you can see as even
Israel's reported the different variations going from on
the ninth and the tenth, the offer for
a full exchange and disarm it.
That they just said no.
Israel wants the complete removal of all of
them and the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and
they don't. That's why they're in they're they
will not reconcile those differences. Hamas agrees to
disarm and relinquish control over Gaza only in
the event that a Palestinian state is achieved,
while Israel stands staunchly against the state in
any way.
Knowing this full well, Israel realized that his
strategy over the past two years has failed
to inflict a decisive defeat on Hamas.
Really, I argue, Palestinians
and had failed to ethnically cleanse the entire
population. Therefore, Israel now works with Trump and
the administration to implement its master plan that
will be an entirely new phase of the
overall war against the people of Gaza. Sadly,
I agree.
If Israel intended to allow reconstruction
ever,
it would not continue to destroy Palestinian homes
as it is doing right now in the
West Bank and in Gaza behind the yellow
line or bombing elsewhere.
If it actually sought for the violence to
end,
it would not be continuing to kill civilians
or be using its ISIS linked proxy forces
to do its bidding while appealing to an
international invasion force to take over its mission
of of disarming Hamas. If the Israelis wanted
to withdraw from Gaza, they wouldn't be violating
their own yellow line, which you could prove
they are. If, indeed, they wanted to end
the humanitarian crisis that they have created,
they would not be restricting aid and developing
an ultimatum plot whereby Palestinians will be forced
to choose between death
and fleeing their own territory.
Furthermore, the Israelis are not only violating the
the ceasefire and using it as a convenient
cloak for implementing an even more insidious agenda,
they're also desperately trying to get Saudi Arabia
to normalize ties with them. In order to
secure Riyadh's normalization deal,
they need to present the lie that the
Gaza war is over and that West Bank
will not be annexed, not happening,
which will be used as an excuse by
Saudi Arabia as to how they help the
Palestinian people.
Similarly, The United Arab Emirates claimed it that
it stopped the West Bank annexation when it
normalized ties, which it is an obvious lie
even more so today
as they're bombing yet again in the West
Bank. These normalizing Arab regimes have aided Israel
in committing its genocide against the people of
Gaza.
And and and I'll tell you what, the
Gaza people know that. And he continues, and
have spread propaganda
against Palestinians and all of their regional allies,
all while while posing as if they're taking
the moral high ground. That's the evil I'm
talking about. The governments of The US and
Israel are now working to implement this new
master plan. If they fail in doing so,
the Israelis will simply return to their more
overt genocidal tactics.
And instead of killing dozens of Palestinians here
and there, they will continue slaughtering over a
100 people a day as they were prior
to October 10.
Very well done.
Realistically, guys, how do we not all see
this? How in the world is this not
the most obvious part of the conversation?
I believe it is. It's hard to know
for sure.
As Elon Levy put out, this guy still
somehow is out there doing things. It's hilarious
to me. Clearly getting very little engagement, though.
This is what's funny. Look at how much
views
and look at how much engagement. Like, these
people have lost control. Like, it's just so
funny to me. Look at that. 245
followers for 245,000
followers. And look at that. 245,000
views. It's almost like they're all bots.
And on top of that, not even engaging.
But see, that's how there should be some
connection to that. Anyway, this complete clown comes
out and says Gaza is now divided into
Hamas Gaza
and free Gaza.
Not a penny of reconstruction must go to
the Hamas area. So all they did was
reconnect recon like, they just set up the
same circumstances, but the yellow line forward.
Nobody honest should be able to I mean,
it should be the easiest thing in the
world to see.
And as Ryan Grim points out, calling the
part of Gaza occupied by Israel the free
Gaza. He's incredible.
There's enough honest people out there, guys, to
be able to call this out.
Ryan Grim also points out that the Washington
Post posted an an an the article we
talked about,
The White House shared this. So the White
House, on top of it all, shared a
post that they claim was written by an
ISIS linked guy.
That's how ridiculous this is today, but the
Washington Post shared an op ed written by
Abu Shebaab, the gang member, from multiple accounts.
Now remember, Robert points out that he's not
literate in English, let alone Arabic. So the
argument that he wrote this is highly doubtful.
But even so, it says Post then replied
with a gift link.
The op ed was pitched by a pro
Israel PR firm. Israel backed these gangs. The
rot is so deep.
My god is ready for peace. Hamas is
trying to destroy it.
Wow.
And this is this is crazy. We're literally
watching ISIS gangs write articles for the Washington
Post.
ISIS groups control Syria, and they're literally I
mean, it's just like this this is so
how did we get here
where we can see so clearly what's happening?
I mean, it comes back to the same
point that I'm always talking about.
They know we see it. They know the
majority sees it, and they don't care because
they don't need you to do what they're
doing. And that's never been more clear. And
if we continue to stand by and let
it grow, we won't be able to stop
it.
Now I'll include the articles I did about
this. Israel was always going to violate the
ceasefire as which we can clearly see as
ISIS linked gangs continue their Gaza killing, as
well as the one I mentioned earlier, Israel
continues bombing Gaza during ceasefire, and Netanyahu aims
to swap ISIS linked gangs for Hamas.
Now this is important. A little bit of
a long clip, but I think it's important
for you to see.
This is in the UN. Now I'm not
saying blindly trust the UN. But just I
mean, I'll even grab this as well just
to make the point.
The idea that we can have so and
this is a fraction
a fraction
of the doctors
world around the world from every other country.
Like, some people that are in Gaza, but
we're not even mentioning those even though we
should. Like, in this context, the point is
just international doctors not from Gaza that are
telling you exactly what the doctors in Gaza
are telling you are happening. They're raping and
murdering and executing and targeting children in the
genitals, guys. I mean, it's one after another
for a very long threat.
All of them telling you what they know
Israel's doing, that there's no Hamas in the
hospitals, that they're literally just kidnapping doctors and
torturing people and burying bodies and stealing organs.
It's outrageous how clear this is.
So
here's a clip of the UN,
it is the UN undersecretary general for humanitarian
affairs, who's telling you what's going on on
the ground. Now whether or not he says
this, you can prove this is what's happening.
It's just crazy to think about. And and
as usual, as he's writing, saying this, you
got the Israeli ambassador scrolling on his phone.
Like, to make a point, we just don't
even care what you have to say. And
then recognize where we currently are with what
Netanyahu is doing. This guys,
we are in a very day I mean,
a time of true evil.
And now give the floor to mister Tom
Fletcher.
Oh,
and I will make the point before we
get into it. Like I said before, that's
why I said I'll come back to it.
Tell me again why he's even there.
Right? Why is that a real Israeli ambassador
sitting right there under Israel? Why is he
even there?
Aren't you guys the one that tells us
that UN is Hamas? Are you guys the
one that tell you that they're completely anti
Israel? Okay. So why would you even take
part in a process that you keep telling
us is completely broken? It doesn't matter.
Because it doesn't, and it does.
Right?
I agree that UN is a very problematic
thing in general. And I very much over
the years have pointed out how it is
completely controlled largely by The US and Israel,
but can be that from any point. But
I've always also pointed out the importance, I
think, of having this the the the lens
to have a situation where you can have
all these different people sit there in that
circle, all of which probably have their own
agendas, probably not for their own people, but
have that converse. It's sort of like a
check and balance part for, like, The US
dynamic. When I saw Ivan Morales stand up
and scream about the you know, to lay
out the agenda, And at that point, they
said, look. Get ready. Look at Pompeo staring
at him. There's a regime change coming, and
lo lo lo and behold, that's what happened.
The point though is that that's not the
UN structure. That's just individual governments and people
speaking up, and, yes, question all of them.
But there is an importance to that. And
I think we're seeing that, by the way,
this is playing out around Israel. My point
though is for him to sit there and
tell you, like, it's meaningless and then, you
know, that they're all Hamas and then sit
there and take part just shows you how
desperate, how vulnerable they truly are.
Mister president,
members of the council,
briefing you again on this subject is a
grim undertaking.
Before starting, I ask you to reflect for
a moment
on what action we will tell future generations
we each took
to stop the twenty first century atrocity
to which we bear daily witness in Gaza.
It is a question we will hear sometimes
incredulous,
sometimes furious,
but always there
for the rest of our lives.
One more thing to add to is that,
you know, you can you can completely remove
the word genocide.
It is
one. That's one of the most obvious parts
of the conversation, but but call whatever you
want. I mean, the argument this is where
it gets so so unnerving.
To then for the people that wanna argue
it's not a genocide, but then go all
the way to the side and say it's
not even, you know, there's not starvation.
There's no war crimes. That's not even what's
happening. It's just evil Hamas and killing people
on October 7. It's so completely disconnected from
what literally everyone can see. It's just desperate.
But my point is they they you can
remove he doesn't say genocide.
Nobody can deny the amount of war crimes
that have carried out by The US and
Israel in such a short the amount of
bombs they've dropped, the amount of people they've
killed, the open admissions from people on their
dancing TikTok videos, the vote to rape people.
I mean, my god. This whole thing has
completely broken down in front of them. So
just recognize you can dispute the genocide all
you want, the term, the word. There's no
denying what this is. The world sees it.
We will surely all claim
to have been against it.
Maybe we will say we issued a statement
or that we trusted that private pressure
might work
despite so much evidence to the contrary,
Or pretend that we thought a more brutal
military offensive
had more chance of bringing the hostages home
than the negotiations
which brought so many hostages home.
Maybe some will recall that in a transactional
world, we had other priorities.
Or maybe we will use those empty words,
we did all we could.
Mister president, let me start with what we
see and are mandated by this council to
report.
Israel is deliberately and unashamedly
imposing inhumane conditions
on civilians
in the occupied Palestinian territory.
For more than ten weeks, nothing has entered
Gaza.
No food, medicine,
water, or tents.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians
have again been forcibly displaced
and confined into ever shrinking spaces
as 70%
of Gaza's territory
is either within
Israeli militarized
zones
or under displacement
orders.
70%.
As my colleague from the FAO will explain,
every single one of the 2,100,000
Palestinians
in the Gaza Strip
face the risk of famine.
One in five face starvation,
despite the fact that you have funded
the food that could save them.
The few hospitals that have somehow survived
bombardment are overwhelmed.
The medics who have somehow survived drone and
sniper attacks
cannot keep up with the trauma and the
spread of disease.
Even today, the European Gaza Hospital in Khan
Yunus was bombed
again
with even more civilian casualties reported.
I can tell you from having visited what's
left of Gaza's medical system
that death on this scale has a sound
and a smell
that does not leave you.
As one hospital worker described it, children scream
as we peel burnt fabric from their skin.
It's just so horrible.
Every single part of it. Now I'm gonna
I'm gonna leave it there for the moment
because I'm realizing we're longer than I wanted
today, and I wanna get I wanna cover
the last part, which we're gonna go more
into the next show, but Venezuela and a
lot of things.
It's just it's just so overwhelmingly obvious and
how his point about, you know,
that he knows that within that room that
they all see it, and that some of
them were secret you know, quiet pressure was
gonna work. Like, so even then, this is
just it's compromised, guys. It's compromised.
And so this is Benjamin
Netanyahu, October 27. It says less than 1.5
to one ratio. No genocide. No famine. Lots
of lies.
Closing the book on the genocide, deliberate starvation.
They're literally
still they're coming out and going, not only
is it not it doesn't exist.
There is no genocide. There is no famine.
That's Benjamin Netanyahu's account, guys. And I said,
look at that. 8,300.
Like, you realize how little growth they're getting
right now? Nobody is on their side right
now. And even the false bot system is
still making it look like they're getting engagement.
I could be wrong about that.
But I just said, now listen to the
speech. He's you know, it's just it's just
disgusting where we are.
These people are the villains of our time.
Now let's not forget, by the way, I
do wanna shout out these politicians.
This conversation,
your daily reminder that a third generation American
citizen who is now being illegally held in
Israeli prison has been there for seven months
or more.
No one
in the supposed America First administration, not one
of them has said a word. Not Donald
Trump, not Marco Rubio, not Pam Bondi, not
Cash Patel, not Pongino. Seems like I'm losing
my voice all of a sudden.
I just can't get past that.
It is so so
so conspicuous.
So the point I wanna highlight here, this
is from the article I recently saw for
the twenty second. US lawmakers urged Donald Trump
to secure the release of an American teen
in Israel.
Group of 27 congress members called for the
release
of Mohammed Ibrahim, 16 years old, born in
Florida, third generation,
held in Israel attention centers. Here's the here's
the crazy thing. The people like Eric Doherty
and Laura Loomer and the rest will probably
tell you he's a Muslim, so he shouldn't
be here. Even though his family was even
though he was born here, third generation family
was born
here. Look at his name. He must hate
you and your freedom.
What the hell, guys? I can't even believe
we're talking about this stuff. The point to
show you on this
is that this is
US
lawmakers
standing up finally and saying,
why haven't we cared for seven months? Even
they should have said something before seven months
went by.
Can you guess who stood up and said
something? Let's take a look at the 27
lawmakers.
Take a look at that.
Now in no way am I suggesting that
this means they're on the right side. That's
never what that means.
One of them with independent, but caucuses of
democrats.
Every single one of them are democrats.
Every one of them.
How does that possibly make sense to you?
Now you need you I think it behooves
everyone to start to look at this through
the lens of that there is not really
two parties when it comes to your government.
So
what we have now, just like we just
like the democrats going like, expose the Epstein
list. I don't think any of them want
that.
But they know that they can push right
now because they're not the one on the
hook to do it. And they probably know
that Trump's never gonna allow it to happen,
so they can make it look like they're
the ones. Same exact thing here.
So they vote very
easy to go do something,
Trump, to say go do something about the
the kid. They could just as easily stand
up and scream, make a big deal, and
go to Israel. They're doing that because I
don't think they care. I don't think they
care about the American citizen. I don't think
they care that Israel does what it wants
to American citizens.
I think they wanna look like they do.
What I'm trying to point out more than
anything to reach the people that need to
hear it the most is that out of
all of these grandstanding people that will pretend
they care, not even one of them is
a Republican. Not even willing to pretend.
Why? Because they're currently in the position to
do something about it, and they don't wanna
buck Israel. They eve they don't care about
American citizens where Israel's concerned, let alone ever,
if you really understand our government.
I think if you're a Republican
and you're an America first, which you should
be,
and you can recognize that your team, let's
just say the Republicans, if you think it's
like that, aren't even speaking up, let alone
choosing to vote for some kind of action
when an American citizen is held illegally in
a foreign prison for seven months.
Imagine if that was your your your son.
Imagine if that was your brother.
Do you think Trump would care then?
Clearly not. Doesn't matter. I mean, I just
it's so in your face.
Bring it up.
Yeah. Of course. You're looking very clearly. September
29, 4,000 views. I will treat that every
day for the next six years, and I'll
probably get a thousand more views.
So
I'll include some of these. We're just gonna
briefly go through it, and then let's finish
with Venezuela.
Liam Cunningham
has been
constantly calling
Zionism out for a while
now. He post this one.
Israel forces bulldoze a Palestinian
school while students are still inside the building.
This scene this isn't a scene from history.
It's happening right now. This is
what they're doing to Palestine. Tall Palestinians.
And as Liam says, this is Zionism.
They seize it. They realize this is what
they're doing everywhere, guys.
I mean, these children are screening in the
building. They're there there's no legal reality here.
They just covet the territories, so they have
to move because they're not part they're lesser
than.
Even Ethiopian Jews that live in a supposed
state for the Jews are considered lesser than
because we're dealing with Zionists.
But if you wanna look at the longer
thread, he's posted stuff like this many times.
Here's one you probably saw recently.
This guy's
broken, crying because they stole his harvest, took
everything he had, all of the olive trees.
They in many cases, they burn them down.
They uproot them. They do anything to stop
them. A Palestinian grandfather cries after Zionist settlers
destroyed his olive groves and stole his olives
in West Bank.
Sometimes these things have been in their family
for generations, and they completely destroy everything they
own, everything.
And then later, they come back, and they
burn their house down.
This is just so wild what we're dealing
with, and people in the team sport arena,
but both sides don't seem to care.
Here's the, what's this? I'm forgetting his name
all of a sudden. Oh, there. Doctor Mark
Perlmutter.
He says, the testimony of a Jewish American
doctor exposes unimaginable unimaginable
cruelty. Israeli soldiers tied up two Palestinian children,
buried them alive. Their innocent cries were hurt,
were silenced beneath the dirt.
This is an American
doctor who's screaming about this. I've shown you
clips from him more times than I can
count.
Overwhelming.
Next one.
You've seen this one too, I think. BM
posted this in the twenty fourth. Each this
is in it's a rally a rally a
rabbi in Israel.
Each of us, whether you're a civilian, a
soldier, a police officer, a shin bet, or
a Mossad agent, he says, if you see
them and you have even the smallest legal
excuse,
empty two magazines on them, not just one.
That's not a man of god.
That's that's a disgusting evil person.
Prominent genocidal rabbi,
Samuel Eli, Eli you how did you say
that? I don't know. Eli Yuah,
father of minister of heritage,
calls Israel
Israelis to murder any recently released Palestinian captive
they see on the street
with a smile on his face.
Yes, Liam. I agree. This is Zionism.
But I mean, you can easily prove that
not every Jewish person believes that, but you
can clearly start to recognize the the the
synergy, the consistency of the Zionist mindset.
Plenty of these.
Two little girls, no feet, no family, just
tears where laughter should be.
Each of them missing a limb.
Right? That that's that's what's going on in
Palestine.
Gaza girl cries seeing journalists who resembles her
father. The Palestinian girl in Gaza teared up
after meeting this journalist who appeared who reminded
her of her father was killed by Israeli
bombs.
Occupying settlers steal the home and and the
the bed and and just literally empty out
the person's house
after they were expelled from Abu Ado Hassan
in the city of Hebron Palestine.
Right. So they they kick him out, then
they steal everything they have. And nobody does
anything about it because the IDF is on
the side of the settlers.
A heartbreaking scene captured by an Israeli drone,
September 10, shows thousands of starving Palestinians deprived
by Israel desperately scrambling for aid trucks to
feed their families.
Oh, and there was one the one that
there was one down here at the bottom.
Worth pointing this out, going back to the
censorship point of it all. Check this out.
It's look at that one.
The post is unavailable. Well, technically, the post
is not unavailable, but I show you this
often, which is why you should post the
link and not just retweet.
The post is there. What's interesting is clearly
it's so suppressed, they don't even want you
looking at the tweet where they've removed the
other tweet. Think about how wild that is.
You know why? Because Twitter has deleted the
footage. They still give you a link to
the the Twitter the Telegram side of it.
So I'll include that for you. Make sure
you see what they clearly don't want you
to see. It's gonna be horrifying horror
disgusting footage of what they're doing, blowing apart
dead bot people are killing Palestinians. The point
though
is they they don't delete the tweet. They
just remove the content, guys, because they're trying
to suppress the flow of information.
They don't want you seeing what Liam writes
is Zionism. Look. Hey. Suddenly, it's there now.
Watch this.
Oh, now it's gone. What a coincidence.
Now,
I will just time in general, I will
I'm gonna be talking about this more. I
highly recommend you check out we didn't even
plan to to to focus on on the
Venezuela point, but I I just started off
as I kinda have been lately with interviews.
Like, you know, Dave, what's on your mind?
You know, what right now, what's the the
first thing that you're thinking about? And he
went into Venezuela. So I I kind of
went I we were that's we kinda focused
on for most of the discussion.
The title was the impending US regime change
in Venezuela and the rising global agenda.
It's really a great conversation. We get into
a lot of different things, including, like I
said, the parts of Gaza and Israel and
the ISIS linked gangs. But what's going on
with this Venezuela thing is just wild. And
I I will I think I might just
do a solo focus on this for other
things going forward
because it just needs to be discussed, like,
involving the full picture. So much of what
happens today is so, like, reactionary to the
current moment. Instead of, like, bringing in, like,
with Iran, going back to Operation Ajax and
the different attempts to regime change, or in
Venezuela, the same point. Go back to Hugo
Chavez and look at the many different
intelligence operations and efforts to kill him and
well, and, really, what they were trying to
accomplish had nothing to do with freedom. It's
not new, guys.
Check out this interview. I think it's very
well done in regard to what Dave brings
to the table, and that's pat myself on
the back. But I think that the conversation
was really, really interesting.
I also make this point in the in
discussion, but I don't think we we can't
miss this. And this goes on. This is
for every real problematic element. The immigration part
of it, but this is for the Venezuela
part, Stephen Miller. This is on September 29,
mind you.
Now look at where we are. Stephen Miller
takes leading role in strikes on alleged Venezuelan
drug bows. Right? So this Zionist is clearly
driving this country to collapse. It feels like
that to me.
But today,
yet again, in case you missed it,
HEGSAT comes out again and says they just
bombed four more vessels.
No evidence. They just go eight terrorists were
killed.
That's it. They don't give you any information.
There's no legal reality for why they should
even be able to bomb ships in the
middle of the international waters without any evidence.
This is unprecedented in every possible way. And
now they're I mean, one of these would
have been crazy. But they've what? There's been
40 people,
15 shit. I mean, they're just going rapid
fire. Like, they're trying to make a point
here, guys.
This is wild.
This is illegal. That's the point to take
away from this. There's no world in which
what they're doing right here is legal.
In any context, not internationally, not from The
US perspective, they're just pushing the envelope. So,
look, they can do what they want because
we can
challenge me.
That's what they're doing. And if you do,
they come after you. If you're a judge,
they try to do everything they can. If
you're a politician, they try to it's it's
it's a
not necessarily
different than before, but to a degree that
is very, very much elevated.
So here
oh, a couple of other points before we
play some clips. This see another one of
these guys. I've never heard of this guy.
1,300,000.
Hey, buddy. He's on Clay and Buck. Oh,
it's with Clay Travis, I guess. Anyway, the
point is, he post this.
Associated Press says US carried out three strikes
on four alleged drug running boats in Eastern
Pacific. He says killed said it killed 14
people. One survivor, which they'll probably repatriate because
they don't want you to hear what he
has to say. This guy says, the FAFO
foreign policy in effect. God, we are dealing
with children.
F around and find out. What are you,
in kindergarten? I mean, this is so embarrassing.
These people are the meme PR generation. Like,
what you're doing, I don't mean, like, in,
like, a generation sense, really. Like of the
where age you were born in. It's like
this weird political category of people that are
like, I you know, it's it's it's like
it's the kind of person that's going out
there and and wanting to make fun of
people suffering, dunking on the other side because
look at how dumb they are, even though
anybody with a brain who's an adult in
the room can recognize that both sides of
the partisanship are identical today.
But the f around and find out. So
what your argument is, the f around is
people doing things in national water that we
can't verify Or, you know, the f around
is what? You blindly trust in the government
like a complete follower? Or, you know, you're
fine in the deep state by blindly trusting
what the government tells you? Good thinking, man.
Very intelligent. 1,300,000
followers.
This is what you deal with in partisan
blinded coverage.
F around and find out. Like, you're just
you're talking about you're talking about war crimes.
You're talking about provable examples of people that
were very known fishermen, people that were let
go without any crimes, that even Colombia let
go because there was no evidence. These people
are killing people and your response is f
around and find out. Again, the children in
the room.
Here is a good point from Mimi who
says, I like to point out that Biden
was laying out the groundwork for this. He
put out $30,000,000
reward for the arrest of Maduro at the
end of his term. Imperialism is a bipartisan
position. See, anybody with a brain and willing
to stand back and look has already seen
this.
The argument now, even from the Trump administration,
is sort of like that Biden allowed this
somehow and he didn't really push hard enough.
Agent, you have to always make it a
counterbalance
because if you recognize that it's the government
doing it, well, suddenly, it changes the whole
game you're
and this person says maybe Trump should have
a little talk with the CIA since they're
the world's largest drug traffickers.
Yes.
Pretty amazing.
But we have the Gulf Of America,
and there are very few boats, very, very
few boats.
By the way, very quickly, I never really
commented on this, but how embarrassing was it
that they literally tried to sue the AP
Associated Press for refusing to force their people
to call it the Gulf Of America?
The again, that's why you see, when I
say this, it's not like I'm just trying
to be, like, you know, insulting.
It's a it's a childish thing we're dealing
with. These people are acting like children.
Like, you're literally the kind of kid that
you'd be like, shh, quiet down. You're you're
a little out of control. You know, I
can't make a classroom. Like, these people are
the ones that are being ridiculous. My point
here is that
what world is that? Like, the effort it's
all about Paul. You know what it is
again? Flooding the zone. So even in the
show, we can get you for I can
forget how you know, the bottom line is
trying to force them to call it that
is so dumb. It makes me they'd be
uncomfortable.
You know, they're like, what are you doing?
You're so embarrassing.
And they lost on top of that. It's
just insane. But I I never really commented
on that. It just shows you what nonsense
we're dealing with today.
Of America,
and there are very few boats, very, very
few boats. Not even fishing boats, to be
honest. I don't wanna do that to the
fishing industry, but
it's See how funny that is? Oops. I
forgot we had to change the narrative. Right?
Because he's been doing that in every one
of the interviews. There's no boats. There's no
one around. He's basically going, look at look
how good I did. Like, almost kind of
flaunting it in faces of people who know
it's a crime. Like, there's not even anybody.
Look at that. And then what oops. That's
right. Last time I said that, it made
it look clear that I was hurting everybody,
not just terrorists, if that's even who's there.
So he adds a little on top.
Oops. That's right. That's a dumb thing to
say. I mean, it's easy to point out.
To be honest, I don't wanna do that
to not even fishing boats, to be honest.
I don't wanna do that to the fishing
industry, but Too late. It's been so effective.
And our,
our sea drugs, as they call them, they
use the term sea drugs, the drugs Who
in the world
says sea drugs?
Am I wrong?
I mean, who knows? Maybe it's a word
that I don't know because it's only in
certain circles, but I laughed out loud when
I heard that. I think my opinion is
probably something Trump just blurted out loud then
been like, that's the thing that we use.
Now it becomes a thing. Watches Eric Goverde
and Posobiec and and Benny Johnson, and now
it's all start calling it sea drugs, sea
drugs, sea drugs, sea drugs, then it becomes
a thing.
Or I'm wrong. I just I just it's
such a meaningless point. I think it's funny
to me. Sea drugs just sounds stupid. It's
redundant. They're drugs
that happen to be on the sea. Stupid.
And our,
our sea drugs, as they call them, they
use the term sea drugs, the drugs coming
in by sea,
are are like 5%
of what they were
a year ago, less than 5%.
He realized they've never even proven that they've
done anything other than kill people in boats
and aren't even caught lying more than once
about it. But yet suddenly you've saved millions
of lives?
Kind of a stretch there, bud. So now
they're coming in by land, and even the
land is concerned because I told them that's
gonna be next. You know, the land is
gonna be next. And we may go to
the senate. We may go to the, you
know, congress and,
tell him about it, but I can't imagine
they'd have any problem with it. I think,
in fact, while we're here, I think it's
a good idea, Pete. You go to congress.
You tell him about it. What are they
gonna do? Say, gee, we don't wanna stop
drugs. God. Sometimes it just makes you wonder
if he really is have any idea what's
going on. Right? Is he just, like, calling
Netanyahu to know what he should do tomorrow?
Like, how insane that
is. You're first of all, I highly doubt
they do that at all. That's that's a
floated statement to make you think they're gonna
do anything.
They'd already bombed these boats. You think they're
gonna go to them to get more approval
for something they've already done and didn't ask
approval for in the first place? It's a
crime. I'll play these clips for you next
from even Rand Paul, who's a Republican, who's
and that's why they hate him because he
calls these things out like Massey does, that
these are crimes, not debatable.
100%
objective violations of both US and international law.
But, you know, let's just go ahead and
ask them. What are they gonna do? Say
no? Yes.
And then you'll let's just even say they
do that. They'll go, see. They're just Democrats
who hate us.
Again, all of that may just be aimed
at the smallest percent of the conversation that
they pretend is everybody. Maybe I'm wasting my
time even talking about it. That's what I'm
grappling with lately. But, overall,
he said the land, guys. It's not secret
that this is going to increase. Regime change
for Venezuela was even basically floated by numerous
people. It is coming,
at least as the narrative seems to build.
They've been going after this for a long
time, but important to include
Jason Basler. Both the US state department and
the DEA confirmed that Venezuela, quote, it plays
no role in the production of trafficking of
fentanyl into The United States. How do we
get lost in these moments? You realize that's
the US Trump administration who's telling you there's
zero connection here, and yet the major line
from re screening people online is
you care, you know, as I mean, Trump
just said in that interview, we saved all
the lives of the drug. It's It's not
happening for Venezuela. And that's the point. They're
claiming this is about Venezuela and Maduro. So
if you if you think right now it's
about drugs, watch as this shifts into Venezuela
and they stop caring about drugs. Watch.
My opinion. I could be wrong. Maybe that's
important for their ongoing agenda. My prediction is
this is going to shift into full blow
Venezuela under the guise of the drug point
and then just drop the point about the
drugs when they focus on regime change because
that's how broken this thing is.
I'm doing this long enough to watch
how quickly these people can lose. I think
it's because they don't think you'll see it.
And because they're lost, I don't know. But
as Daniel Luke Adams writes, Venezuela, fentanyl, Iraq,
WMD.
100%.
And then this point too is just so
embarrassing.
Jack Posobiec comes out and says and then
I forget what is this again? I forget
the name of it. It's meant to be
kind of like the the conscientious objector, the
guy standing up and going, you know, like,
the rational thing is what that this image
is supposed to represent. Jack even changes his
face to represent him,
or someone did it, but it's just a
narcissist. The point,
we should keep killing the drug dealers. Like,
that's the rational thing that no one else
is saying, except that's literally what all of
you morons are screaming and they're all and
the rational conversations.
This is what's so funny about it. I
was just joking about the Confederacy of Dunces
this morning, the book and the reality of
how that's what these people are, and they
love to you know? So in this case,
you're framing yourself as the one lone free
thinker step is saying the thing no one's
allowed to say or able to say.
That is what most of you are saying.
What's being removed and not pointed to are
people like us going, but, hey, maybe that's
a crime. Hey, maybe both sides are involved.
So it's so funny to watch them frame
themselves. Like, this is the equivalent of you
going, I'm the rebel fighting the deep state
while you literally support the deep state and
then suppress rebels.
It's what they do. And I said, meanwhile,
Jack cheers Trump's numerous deals with Pfizer.
Moron.
Keep the drug dealers down, but keep those
shots coming that we all pretend to fight
when it was Biden.
All of them are like this, guys, in
the team sport politics arena. Now this is
not unique to MAGA, even though this were
Mediasan points to it.
This is constantly happening to whatever current, you
know, agenda narrative manager we're dealing with. This
person who has let's see. What was it
again?
29,000
followers who and you look look for this
image.
Every million follower count out there is with
one degree or another is promoting something like
this. And it says, we can agree that
thieves
or excuse me, that there is a fair
debate as to whether we ought to bomb
these guys. But you should be beaten senseless
if you try to convince me that this
is a boat full of innocent fishermen.
Okay?
Too bad that picture is from 2012, and
you can easily look it up.
So
6,300,000
views. This guy's got 29,000
followers. You don't think there's a weird thing
going on in his platform?
It's because this is the thing. You're supposed
to point to the thing. And he said
the thing you're all supposed to share. They
all repeat it. And the point is that
6,000,000 views becomes look at this. This guy
goes to photos from 2,012. The guy who
posted it says, so is your mom. They're
not honest actors, guys, but it doesn't change
the 6,000,000 people. They also say the 6,200,000
who didn't recognize he was lying
and then go on to share it or
go on to hold this point in their
mind when they talk to you later on
a different show and go, yeah, but they're
not really fishermen.
And they're thinking of something that is provably
false.
I just pointed this out with this guy
who literally got caught and then reposted it
after he deleted the first one using the
exact same posting, meaning and then got screen,
fact checked on that too.
Whether these are bots or organized elements or
just people out there who wanna watch the
world burn, this is a huge part of
the conversation.
So this guy, who knows if he knows
he's wrong or not? Either way, he left
it up even though people told him he's
wrong. I mean, weirdly, check this out. 42,000
likes and 6,000,000
views? Which, let's just for sake of conversation,
let's check out the quotes real quick.
Oh, good. It looks like some people are
pointing it out.
Not not with big followings and not with
a lot of shares, of course. Yeah. Some
people are. Look at that. Good for them.
TinEye,
Michael Tracy.
I'm trying to get the ones where right
now, it's a lot of calling out because
it's been circulating for a while, you know,
not since the twenty third. And so everyone's
gotten wind of the fact that it's a
false image, and he still leaves it up
and still calls people out for you know,
that's shows you this guy is not in
it for anything other than reach.
But you scroll down, you'll find a lot
of large people who are sharing it because
they're repeating it just like this guy.
Oh, wait. Before we go fast it. This
is what Mehdi has said. He said MAGA
can't exist without existing in a bubble of
fake stories. Well, guess what, Mehdi? That's the
same exact thing for the left side of
the conversation.
And it says, and fake images
and manufacturing hysteria. What he's talking about is
the partisan game within the government control problem.
They lie so much they can no longer
exist without the lies. Now,
can I admit that there's a like, it's
over the top? Yes. Right now, more than
I've ever seen. Now, go back a step.
During the COVID-nineteen
timeframe
in Biden's administration,
could we not all agree that that moment
was the most intense we've at least in
my experience, I've never seen it. It's incrementally
getting worse.
So, Keith, until we can look back and
recognize that, that ultimately whoever comes next is
gonna gain whatever they're doing now, it's not
gonna be like, you know, if Trump then
fights to be ruler forever, well, then that'll
clearly make the case. And I wouldn't even
disagree. I can sense that too. My point
though is that I don't think it's different
than any other person, any other, you know,
element of this government control structure. And so
what he's pointing to, I think, is objectively
clear about the same partisan left right team
sport game.
But my the point is
that's a lie. It's an old picture being
used with 6,000,000 views to convince people that
we should be murdering fishermen.
This guy, I said before,
tweeted this out under the US Homeland Security
news, got fact checked by it, got millions
and millions of reach on it, and I
screenshot it just to be case just to
be sure, just in case he deleted it.
And I said, I told you they delete
it, which suggests that they basically just parented
it from other people they saw. Right? But
then he went and shared it again and
used a new picture of a completely different
boat with four engines and then just wrote
the exact same thing. Colombian president's a liar.
These aren't fishermen.
And got fact checked again using a 2024
image. I mean, couldn't you even use a
picture from 2025?
It's an it's an industry right now,
and the people we constantly point to use
it. Like, they use the MEMRI
Israeli propaganda channel.
So this is Alex Jones, unsurprisingly, going, yay,
regime change in Venezuela because he's a part
of the team today.
Trump has made his decision to overthrow the
communist government. You know, it's just it's again,
the idea that you act like one form
or another of government is the problem. This
is what David I gets very clearly. It's
government, guys. It's government. The problem is that
they make it about one thing versus the
other. What do the Venezuelan people want? Who
cares what they want because we've decided communism
bad? It's government.
All government can consolidate at the top like
we're literally watching as these guys pulled all
their punches. But David Icke says people are
saying you've sold out to that deep state,
Alex Jones, because you have because you have.
That's what he wrote. Everything you once railed
against is is now good so long as
Trump does it. That's objectively clear. And he
says here, he's okay with the military invasion
of Venezuela.
Keep blowing the boats up, he says, while
Trump and his fantastic,
fascistic regime provide no evidence.
Look. You may agree that that should happen
if you can prove their drug but the
point is even then, it's still a crime.
It's just like talking about every other conversation.
You can't claim that eat collected punishment is
not a crime because you've got a narrative.
Same thing here. The point is that you
have to prove that even then it would
be a crime, but let's just say you
could prove they were drug traffickers. At least
then we could have an argument about whether
that this is not even being proven.
So this is Alex Jones acting like he's
fighting the government deep state whatever, the journalist
breaking through
who's literally blindly parroting what the government said
and then going rah rah, do it more.
That's pretty embarrassing from anybody's perspective.
He goes on to say, keep, he goes,
he's so deluded he actually drones on as
if the reason to regime change is really
drugs. Stomach turning.
It is wild.
Now here are two clips. I'll play this
one already, but I wanna play it for
you, and then we'll wrap up pretty much.
I think there's only a few more tweets
I wanna show. Oh, I a couple more
clips, actually.
But this is David Icke said this is
what Alex Jones should be saying if he
were really against the deep state tyranny. In
no way from either him, I would argue,
but myself,
most importantly,
are are we arguing this person is flying
to the deep state? I don't believe that.
I don't believe that's what he's saying. The
point is simply that even this person is
it's such the surface level argument that this
is so obviously a crime and so obviously
unjust
that even the FOX news person is going
that that's a problem.
And yet the guy fighting the deep state
is the one going, yay, Rah. Go more
regime change. Go more authoritarian
regime change control.
Steal the resources. Kill innocent people. Don't prove
any of it.
Call it out.
Well, I think that there's always a choice,
and you're right about the demand issue, and
I wish that we could do more about
that. And this I mean, this has been
going on forever that we have a a
drug consumption problem here and a Which is
not your decision to make or the government's.
The idea that we ever allow people this
is what's so crazy. That's not in line
with liberty. That's not in line with the
constitution.
They don't care. They've been violating that their
entire career their entire lives, it seems. But
just recognize the core point that they're telling
you, you're not allowed to decide for yourself
what you wanna consume.
And therefore, we have to murder people?
It's just it's completely illogical.
Drug supply problem coming from South And Latin
America. So I I totally And, again, in
case you missed that first part, that's not
really what's happening. There is not the fentanyl
issue with Venezuela, and so it's just a
manufactured element to go after Venezuela is what
it very clearly is developing into. We'll get
to the points again where they're saying regime
change. That's where this is aimed at. At
that. But when you're looking at how this
fight
is being executed at this particular moment,
it doesn't
make a lot of sense. First and foremost,
the fact that no one can confirm that
we've actually been taking out narco traffickers or
huge drug traffickers, however you wanna say it.
And last week when we were talking about
this, Dana had just seen the alert that
the admiral at the that the admiral in
charge of the southern command had resigned.
Again, how much can we ignore?
How many people can go, this is wild.
I can't even do this anymore. People that
were Republican, people that were appointed by Trump,
just like last time.
Again, it it's it's willful ignorance to not
acknowledge that that at the very least is
a red flag. And he was the one
who was in charge of this, and the
reporting is is that he wasn't comfortable with
the mission. Yeah. And I've been pushing back
within the Pentagon. And do you think he
would have resigned if everything was by the
book? So we have No. We should assume
that. We should find out what he you
know, what what does he have to say,
whether he ever wants to speak on it
or not, probably not with where the climate
is. But he he could have resigned for
some other reason. That's being objective. But, again,
since we know that it is a problem,
since we know it's a crime based on
the law,
that this guy then resigns before it saying
it's uncomfortable, I think it's pretty clear what
you can suss out from that. But, again,
we have all the examples of the state
department people, people in the FDA, people in
the CDC,
all across the board from Trump and Biden's
last administration where they're telling you they are
doing the wrong thing and I can't be
a part of it anymore. Both of which
relate around the genocide,
and they all support. Thirty two people that
have been killed so far, seven individual strikes.
We know that the Colombian president is alleging
at least that an innocent fisherman was murdered.
We know that there's a family,
from Trinidad who's saying that a member of
their family
was killed. And then it is really important
that we have repatriated two people, one to
Colombia, one to Ecuador, because that indicates that
we don't have any evidence to prosecute them,
that we didn't know who these guys were.
Because if you did have ev Or that
they didn't want to. Like, maybe they are
drug traffickers, and the point was not about
trying to make this come to any possible
conclusion.
Just like I said with the immigration port
or with El Salvador, like, there's very provable
evidence,
right, that they they like, with Garcia, for
example. Like, do we it's funny how much
little how little attention this still gets even
though there's a new reporting about it. Like,
there is a very clear deal that was
made between Bukele and the Trump administration
in regard to exchanging prisoners that Bukele did
not want to testify in US courts, who
knew that there was a deal made between
Bukele
and MS thirteen.
It's not a secret. It's, like, very public,
in fact. It just doesn't get covered by
the screaming people on top and the mainstream
mainstream alternative media apparatus.
So overall,
same thing here. They get it out of
the way because there is no crime other
than what they're doing, and they don't want
that to be part of the conversation. I
this is what
illegal pundits are pointing out. You know, like
or or take one more example.
The idea of the
leaders MS 13 leaders, more than one, in
fact, it's the same overlapping point to what
they did with the deal with Bukele. But
instead of charging the guy,
there was the was the one of the
earliest ones before that deal really became a
focal point. Right in the beginning, Pam Bondi
was like, we've got MF thirteen leader we're
gonna send back to El Salvador.
I was like, you you've been prosecuted. You
you were, like, just about to make this
case because it was going on before they
got to this point. And they just drop
it to send it to El Salvador?
One was because he was going to testify
about something that Bukele did made a deal
with him, and secondarily
was because
they they don't they they wanna get him
out of the way, or rather my point
that I'm making that last part was that
if you're charging this guy with rape, I
think it was one of the charges, and
drug drug overlaps, you know, criminal gang activity.
The guy was a leader of MS thirteen.
You could put him in jail for the
rest of his life. He's caught in The
United States, and you send him away to
a place where he's literally treated like he's
not a criminal.
Does that sound like what should be happening?
No.
Same thing here. Right? If this guy is
actually doing what you're claiming he's doing, it's
a crime. You could charge him somehow. I
mean, the idea of the international part, I
I mean, I I don't wanna say that
to make the point here. I disagree this
should be internationally illegal in any sense. People
should be able to make their choices about
what they wanna consume. Overall,
though, they're getting rid of them because it's
inconvenient for him to actually be able to
like, so you put him back and he
goes, I'm a fisherman. I'm alive. I can
testify to that, then you can prove it.
They'll still deny it. They'll call him rapist,
terrorist, member of a gang like they do
with El Salvador,
Garcia still to this day despite the every
narrative they have being broken down by the
courts.
They'll do it anyway, but that's why.
Then you would bring them before a court.
And I know
that you're gonna make fun of me, and
I am prepared for it each and every
day. But drug traffickers
also have rights. The law Why would you
make fun of it for making an obviously
correct point? Because you're not supposed to say
those things from this team's side. We're so
broken in this country. Well, anybody with these
partisan divides, it's being abused by powerful people.
All applies. We should have the evidence.
They should be charged with something, and they
should come before a court of law. And
Rand Paul was on the Sunday shows this
weekend, and he said to Kristen Welker, when
you kill someone, if you're not in a
declared war, which we are not, congress with
the war powers, you really need to know
someone's name at least. You And then went
on to
initiate articles of impeachment.
No.
So
lackluster for me. Like, if Rand Paul was
serious because he should be, it is a
crime. It's not like there needs to be
another crime to make that even it's a
crime.
Begin the process. Point out that this and
well, look. It's not unique. Biden was break
doing this. Obama was doing this. But the
point, if we ever want there to be
some accountability with the executive branch ever again,
there needs to be the initiation of some
kind of process. They'll all scream political motivation.
They'll all scream but if Rand does it,
if Massey does it, they'll still scream it,
but it'll be different.
Because we know that these needs to be
held these things, whether it's immigration, ICE,
any number of overlaps. So this this takes
the cake for how easy it is to
see.
This needs to be pushed. They need to
be charged with impeachment articles need to be
initiated to in order to at least
concern them that it might happen to maybe
walk back their actions.
Have to accuse them of something. You have
to present evidence. So all these people have
been blown up without any evidence of a
crime. They're also saying that it's about fentanyl,
and people, you know, who analyze the area
are saying that there is drugs that go
through, but it's mostly cocaine and marijuana that
are are headed actually to Europe and to
Africa.
So the government story is not adding up.
That's so funny. I'm just reading somebody in
the chat says,
she's a Fox News. New Combs. Just read.
She's a Democrat.
You're literally making my point for me. It's
just so funny.
So what does that mean? Is she incorrect?
Or is it that we should ignore her
because she's the token democrat on Fox News?
Like, it's just are we this easy to
play? Seriously? I I just am so blown
away by how childishly ridiculous that this conversation
can become.
What she said is true.
What does it matter in the context of
true or false of data points whether or
not she thinks she's an alien living on
Mars? It just doesn't make any sense to
me.
So here's another one. This is from Rand
Paul,
and this is on, I think this might
have been the one she was referencing right
here. I'll just let it speak for itself.
Somewhere where I think the two of you
agree, and that's on some of what of
the last bit of what Lucas was reporting
on there about those strikes out in the
sea. The president says there's gonna be more
information briefing coming to Capitol Hill. Here's what
he said Thursday.
You know, the land is gonna be next.
And we may go to the senate. We
may go to the, you know, congress and,
tell them about it, but I can't imagine
they'd have any problem with it. I think
they're gonna As as if it's just his
casual choice, you know, we may decide to
uphold the constitution or not. You know, maybe
maybe not. That that should be insulting to
anybody who believes in these things. They're probably
like it except for the radical left lunatics.
Alright. So I'll start with you, senator Paul.
What do you need to hear in a
briefing? What questions do you have?
You know, it's not so much about a
briefing, but we haven't had a briefing. To
be clear, we've got no information.
I've been invite That's the government, Not even
his own side. They're not giving anybody anything.
That's on Fox News as well for the
podcast. To no briefing. But a briefing is
not enough to overcome the constitution. Right. The
constitution says that when you go to war,
Congress has to vote on it. And during
a war then, there's a lower
rules for engagement. And peep I will also
point out that that's one of the ways
they pass they surpass they manipulate this. And
I know he knows this. They they argue
they're not at war.
That it was a reactionary thing, you know,
that Trump's executive power has given the ability
to because it was an immediate threat to
Americans because of drug traffic. And, like, they
patch these things together just like with Venezuela.
And these cases, they're not even up they're
not going to be upheld in court, but
they don't care about that right now. They
don't seem to care at all, in fact.
So my point is that you can make
that case, but if you're not going to
add that this is why they already think
that doesn't apply, then all you're kinda doing
is, like, it's still good information. But I
just I think you can sense that I
don't feel like he's really pushing this, and
he should be if it's is what it
is, and it is. He's calling it out.
This should not be something we gloss over.
Right? So but, again, that's what Trump is
doing, and all you're doing is expanding the
ability of the president and the executive branch
to act unilaterally in any way they want
and argue that we're in the middle of
emergency and no one else can do anything.
Trump can because article two, I can do
whatever I want, basically, is what he said,
damn near verbatim.
It's not true. This is crazy that we
could be so constitutionally illiterate in this country
when we the people claiming to support it
the most are the ones that don't seem
to understand it right now. We'll do sometimes
get killed without due process
briefing, but we haven't had a briefing. To
be clear, we've got no information.
I've been invited to no briefing, but a
briefing is not enough to overcome the constitution.
The constitution says that when you go to
war, congress has to vote on it. And
during a war then, there's a lower
rules for engagement. People do sometimes get killed
without due process.
But the drug war or the war or
the crime war has typically been something we
do through law enforcement. And so far, they
have alleged that these people are drug dealers.
No one said their name. No one said
what evidence. No one said whether they're armed,
and we've had no evidence presented. So at
this point, I would call them extrajudicial
killings.
And this is akin to what China does,
to Iran does with drug dealers. They summarily
execute people without presenting evidence to the public,
so it's wrong.
Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And that's something that Trump
has praised more than once. Remember how much
he loved, what's his name?
In
I can't do do do do do do
do do do do do do do do
do do do do do do
They, like, very clearly pointed to it. And
was, you know, like, it's just he they
do not believe in the constitution. I just
don't know how much more clear we can
make that or that he can make that.
But Rand Paul said no briefing, no evidence,
no names. Just people blown up in The
Caribbean and called drug dealers. That's not law
enforcement. That's extrajudicial
killing, sorta like Soleimani, by the way. Except
in that case, he was lured in under
the guise of peace, which makes it far
more of a crime or just immoral.
The constitution says only congress can declare war
until then. These strikes are as wrong as
what China or Iran does.
Sixty minutes.
Couple more points to show you that this
is just exactly what's like, they're making the
case already for why, as Trump already said,
the land like, you're building this into an
idea that we need to cut it at
its source even though it's not Venezuela. So
it showed this is desperate. And on top
of that, then what we can see right
now from I mean, every one of these
things, like, they're they're building this into a
rational situation.
Right? Just like with Israel, Gaza, in this
case, they're trying to convince you that this
is what needs to be done to keep
the American people safe. Even though there's it's
just so abstract to make that case, the
evidence is backing up. There is no drug
fentanyl problem or even cocaine necessarily at a
small degree coming from Venezuela in the context
of every other place we're talking about. Dave
DeCamp, who's who we interviewed recently, says sixty
minutes greasing the skids for regime change war.
Is a very
bad actor
sitting on top of the world's
largest known reserves of oil.
Oh, yeah. So it does seem to be
about something other than drugs. Surprise, surprise. Plus
the critical minerals
that will fuel the twenty first century economy.
A rare earth
elements or minerals.
Lithium seems to be the largest thing, but
there's plenty more than that they need. As
we just talked about, the building of new
AI data centers, of OpenAI pushing that.
And he's in bed with our strategic competitors.
Oh, no. How dare he work with people
we don't want to benefit?
So he's a terrorist. Right? Working with our
or not our enemies necessarily, but just even
people that are adversarial to us in regard
to business.
Can't allow that. Yeah. That's pretty much
the confessions of an economic hitman. Not a
secret. Left and right. And how has he
been able to cling to power for as
long as he has?
I mean, let's let's be very clear. This
is a criminal organization masquerading as a government.
Yes. You know, despite all of the evidence
though, right? And I'm not saying good guy.
I think these governments are all problematic and
have absolutely taken action that are to their
interest at the counter, you know, against the
interest of the people, per se, per se,
per se, per se, per se, per se,
per se, per se But Maduro and Venezuela
have done tremendous amount of things for the
people,
far more than you'd ever see the US
government do for anybody, including free you know,
they made the same point about Libya and
plenty of other places. Free education, free school,
free health care. Who cares? Terrorist. Or the
idea that before they were in earnest really
doing what they're doing today, they're the the
Venezuela had this whole oil for loan this
oil loan program where they were allowing other
countries that were be under the thumb of
foreign powers like the US government to take
basically no interest loans on because they had
so much wealth from the
oil. The US stopped all of that. I
mean, it's it's stole all their gold. I
mean, it's just so blatant what's happening. And
there, the the
the criminal organization. I mean, you realize even
Jimmy Carter and plenty of other people almost
every time are there saying completely legitimate. Craig
Pasta will tell you. Legitimate. I mean, it
was I think it was
Jimmy Carter at the time when he was
there said it was one of the most
up and up he's seen. Hundreds of international
observers and the only one saying no was
the US government. These are manipulators,
or he just doesn't know any better and
he thinks he's in the know, which is
a huge problem in this country.
It's just not the reality. The lies about
starvation, you can prove they made. They're literally
manufacturing these things and then blaming them just
like they do in Iran. Any number, Guaido,
never caught in real time, literally faking these
efforts using fake humanitarian aid. Sure sounds familiar
today now, doesn't it? To push in a
truck full of barbed wire and wood and
then bomb it with these the Molotov cocktails
and try to blame Maduro. Only problem was
Guaido's guys got caught on film making them
and throwing them. So, they just moved on.
And the whole Guaido thing just went away?
Now, you're trying to make a new guy
the guy in prison? Or you're trying to
work with Machado, who's literally asked Israel to
regime change
Venezuela and that's supposed to be a legitimate
government?
Because you're going forever like this. And this
guy sits there with a straight face and
just goes, yeah, they're the bad guy. We're
the good guy. Like Caitlin Johnson instead. It's
really that stupid.
It's an individual who is under indictment from
narcotics trafficking. Yep. From their people, from other
parts of the world. Commits human rights violations.
According to them, from other parts of the
world. Someone who has used the apparatus of
the state to throw people in jail to
Oh. Oh, really? You mean, like, literally every
government in the world? You mean, like, you're
doing right now?
Yeah. This is so ridiculous.
I don't ever want it to be taken,
as I've say a 100 times, that I'm
supporting Maduro or his or his government. I
don't support governments. I don't think they need
to exist. But I'm always gonna call it
a lie when I see it,
especially when it comes to governments lying to
manufacture efforts for their own enrichment at the
expense of literally everybody.
Now, here
is another clip from I I I it's
a it's a similar I don't know if
it's the exact same time frame, but it's
a similar conversation, also sixty minutes.
Three ways this can go according to a
lot of the people that we spoke to,
which is he packs his bags.
In the podcast, you talk about Maduro and
Venezuela.
So think about this. Think about the
the pompous like, the bot the idea that
the the I the what's the word I'm
looking for? There's, the entitlement. Like, that you
can sit here and discuss what the what
the outcome should be for a foreign government's
leader that was put in place by its
people despite what your screaming narratives are because
you expect that to be the outcome. Israel,
The US, and western powers are literally manufacturing
this. Leaves
or
no. According to a lot of the people
that we spoke to, which is he packs
his bags
and leaves,
or
he's picked up. There's this big bounty for
his arrest.
Yeah. Sort of like the one they put
on Jelani's head, but now he's the leader
of Syria. So who knows how that's gonna
work out? On top of the fact that
this is a US government bounty on the
head of a foreign leader, I mean, this
is just insane. Like, these are the Banana
Republics. What we're talking the way the US
government is acting is like the it's it's
worse than just about everyone they point to,
guys.
This is a very problematic situation.
So what you're literally saying is you're gonna
take him out, the leader of this country,
and then scream democracy to the world because
you claim he's a criminal.
And in the meantime, murder a bunch of
people on boats because the drug thing that
really only about Venezuela, once we get that,
well, Nick, who cares about drugs anymore? Oh,
gene based. Sorry. I bumped that.
His arrest. So they could he could be
picked up. That's number two.
Or
he can meet his maker. It's not a
question of if, but a question of, when.
You mean killed?
God. People are just brazen.
There's Isn't that just crazy? Like, over the
top?
So here is Afshin Rozzani from going underground.
Maduro is sitting, and this is the same
this is the same clip. He's it's he
says former US ambassador James Story blatantly exposes
the real reason why The US is about
to launch a regime change war in Venezuela.
It isn't about narco trafficking. It certainly is
not about democracy. It's about Monroe doctrine, imperial
domination to steal Venezuela's resources for US corporations.
What is about to come is daylight robbery
of the Venezuelan people. For those who think
this is some problem in a distant country,
eventually, Washington will come for your country. And,
guys, that's what's happening in The United States
right now. We'll get to that to finish.
But here's another clip that you should see.
Dropping you in part one when you're talking
about the,
I suppose,
importance of,
national sovereignty,
and sovereign armies and navies to protect Latin
and Central American countries against the wrath of
any Trump administration
attacks. Nicaragua, I should say, has survived any
of the attacks. But, we were talking about
Venezuela, of course.
Right. Right. Certainly, the long history of American
involvement in in Central And South America,
you know, goes back centuries.
But, you know, certainly, the modern history of
it is quite bloody and quite ugly and
shows the length to which the American governments
will go to maintain
dominance in the Western Hemisphere.
And that won't change,
you know, militarily.
What the the thing I the point I
I was I was reaching for was the
idea that there need to come there need
to be other mechanisms
in the world available,
to to, if not preclude,
then to punish or at least provide some
consequences to the Americans
for actions if regime change occurs in Venezuela
and if it goes the way that history
tells us it will. So it'll look like
the other regime change operations,
throughout the history in in not just, you
know, in in Central America and South America,
which are legion.
We we know how that's gonna go. And
so how do you at least punish the
Americans for it? And I think you see,
a a a point with that where the
American economy is dependent upon other
sources. The American economy
Yes.
The US government runs on the blood of
other nations. How long have I said that?
Now it's an analogy you're talking about not
just blood, but it's the point about the
blood is how you're gaining all these resources.
Literally can't exist without the war state, guys.
That's not what
exist
without the war state, guys. That's not what
Americans want. Every poll shows you otherwise. That's
what the government wants.
Sure as hell shows you the government's acting
unilateral or, I mean, opposite, contradictory to what
American people want.
SureCell seems to be aligned exactly with what
Israel wants. Kinda easy to piece that puzzle
together. It is fragile. It can be exposed.
So, you know, case in point being, in
the last week or so, last two weeks
maybe, when the Chinese,
put forward their controls
on, rare earth minerals, metals, and magnets.
That snapped the Americans' attention right away. That
got the Americans to come to heel. That
you know, there is some bluster, but now,
of course, you know, the The United States
is now negotiating it with China. See how
that always works? Trump comes out and yells
the thing. Yeah. Look what they're doing. Very
stupid. That's not gonna work. Blah blah blah.
Truth social yell and goes off and does
whatever, you know, then capitulates.
And then then we won't hear anymore about
it. Why? Because he doesn't wanna pray. He
doesn't wanna, you know, report publicly the fact
that he had to go to the table.
Right? Because that's what so they gain the
upper hand, which by the way, anybody who's
secure with themselves would not be embarrassed by
acknowledging that they don't always have the upper
hand because nobody always has the upper hand.
But we're dealing with narcissistic small people that
need to feel like they're in control, which
to me suggests that they're not.
Trump says he's gonna meet, Xi.
So, I mean,
there there has to be mechanisms that are
developed, and we're seeing the potential for that
as this multipolar world develops,
as alternatives
to the American,
financial, monetary, and economic order are developed such
as through,
bricks.
But in the meantime, there needs to be
some type of concerted effort,
by nations outside of that top tier of
the American sphere of influence, so essentially the
Europeans,
to do something to oppose any type of
American regime change in Venezuela.
And that has to come through,
in a way that is similar to what
the Chinese did recently
with their control of, again, rare earth minerals
and metals.
Yeah. Point well taken. I just highly doubt
it will happen.
I highly doubt the the any European nation
will decide to stand up at this moment
and push back against what Trump is doing.
I find that wildly unlikely, if not impossible.
And just because of the way they're conducting
it, because they recognize what that will mean,
Trump will penalize them in every possible way
he can just for making him feel, you
know, it's that's what we're seeing.
But I think at the end of the
day,
I
most likely because they're involved.
If you really wanna break down the history
of this, so they all benefit from the
complete dismantlement of a foreign country that they
break down into his pieces and balkanize
and completely sell off. That's what they've done
pretty much everywhere. Now as Dave Smith points
out, it's not looking good. Here's what Segar
reported from DropSite News. He says, as he
and DropSite reported, as regime change ramps up
in Venezuela, there is little to no mass
fentanyl from Venezuela, which we already know.
The Rubio camp is telling Trump the best
way to secure the oil in Venezuela is
if Maduro is ousted. The US is funneling
millions of USAID type money, oh, the thing
that doesn't exist anymore according to Republicans, to
regime change groups in Latin America. Well, you
see, now the USAID machine through the state
department is doing using different things. But maybe
it might be needed to you know, like,
what might need to be used directed towards
Venezuela might suddenly need to be some of
these left narratives because that was where they
might lean a little bit more. So guess
what? We start to see some of those
things roll out through USAID that they don't
want you to focus on. Like I was
telling you about the circumcision in Africa and
whatever else,
it's a means to an end.
But narratives are always fun, right? At the
end of the day, they're literally showing you
we are going to this is the direction.
And it's not new. You go back as
far as you wanna look. Bolton and Trump
in the last time. Well before that and
Obama. They have been trying to achieve this.
So it's like, we why are we going,
oh, drugs now?
It's just a new thing they yell out
to go after the thing they've always been
aiming at, and it's not new. I mean,
imagine if Trump and his administration literally
invaded into Venezuela,
took out Maduro, and then claimed they took
out another
terrorist leader.
The the precedent that creates is just nobody's
off the table. Every government in the world,
the US government, or anybody else with enough
power and and willful
you know, will will to do so can
just invade and just call you a terrorist
and take you out. Guess what? That's exactly
what they're doing to you,
to every American right now.
Now Trump,
this was oh, I'll play this clip really
quickly. Roger Taylor Greene shared this.
I just need to point out that even
Roger Taylor Greene does all the statements of
Israel and supporting and pushing back against them
comes right out just like she did after
the lefty thing too. Lefty, right lefty, you
know,
left wing terrorists, you do the same thing.
So I simply said, you see, it's it's
it's all they're all the same where it
matters. Let's play it first. And then I'm
gonna end with the point of these these
two clips and about bringing it home. I
don't I just want you to miss the
point that I was just making there about,
you know, that this is coming to you,
and it's very clear. But let's play this
clip for, this one first.
If you are declaring war against these cartels
and congress is likely to,
approve of that process, why not just ask
for a declaration of war? Yeah. What a
great question. Surprising that you get a good
question
because they know they won't get it and
or really they don't care. They want their
I think the power The US power structure
is trying to force or stress the idea
that congress is irrelevant. We don't even need
constitution even. These are old old ideas. We're
trying to keep you all safe for the
boogeyman that we create. So who cares about
all the rest of it? That's what I
think both sides of it want to initiate.
The idea that we need to, you know,
narrative emergency, therefore, we can't do that. And
if we go to congress, we won't have
enough time, you know, whatever it is. The
reality is those things shouldn't even be arguments,
shall not be infringed, principles that should not
be ignored.
Well, I don't think we're gonna necessarily ask
for a declaration of war. I think we're
just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs
into our country.
Okay? We're gonna kill them. You know? They're
gonna be, like, dead.
Who is this? I mean, this is how
embarrassing.
Your response see, what he's doing right there
is is trying to bluster. He's trying to
act like he's tough and, you know, he
got I think he he didn't like the
question. Right? Because it makes him it sounds
like the question's obvious. Why don't you do
what you're supposed to do is the real
question. And so what you he pushes back
and acts like he's we're gonna kill them
all. They're gonna be dead, like dead.
Why would you say that? The effort is
to try to stress that I'm not afraid.
I'm the one. I'm strong. I'm doing the
right thing even though what you just did
was ridiculous.
Who cares if they're dead? That wasn't even
the question. The question is why don't you
seek a a declaration of war? And he
knows that it's uncomfortable because he's doing the
wrong thing. So he just screams back, and
we're gonna kill everybody. It's almost like a
threat. I mean, you get the sense that
it's supposed to be
pounding your chest. That's what he was just
doing.
Okay.
So seems to be pretty vulnerable
if you want my honest opinion, which I
always give.
But she says, I think we're just going
to kill people, bringing drugs into our country,
which by the way is not how the
legal reality works. And she goes, I fully
support Trump and our military protecting our Americans
from illegally deadly drug trafficking.
First of all, we should probably wanna prove
that. Right, Green?
But then then we should maybe actually, I
don't know, have a process to the pro
thing and not just execute them in the
water even if you've proven it. But then,
maybe even then we recognize that we don't
have legal authority in the middle of the
ocean. None of that seems to matter to
these patriots.
And I said, you see, they're all the
same when it matters. I always hope I'm
wrong about that, but history and their daily
actions and their statements continue to show me
otherwise. Hashtag
empire first. It's what it's really about.
Scott Star points out, war has become a
sport, and The US seems to have the
best team. This is at least, you know,
in in regard to the pieces and the
money they spend, in regard to outcome, well,
it's yet to be seen, in regard to
a certain few factors, but that's not the
point.
Article from October 24, which shows all the
team players. He goes, I find this to
be sick and psychotic. You can't stop drug
trafficking.
There's always another way to get drugs through.
I agree. I don't it's not even about
that. But just take a look at all
of what they're deploying. This is the dozens
of military assets that are already deployed in
The Caribbean.
Look at
all
that. To amphibious assault ships,
to destroyers, to aircraft carriers, to helicopters
and jets, and, I mean, my god.
And and and you're just popping off some
bombs on a little boat?
Clearly, it's not about the boats and the
drugs, guys.
So
it's coming home. Now the war on drugs,
whatever you actually pretend that always was, that
that's always been there. This is something different.
Dan Bongino on the twenty fourth says the
citizens of Philadelphia deserve safe and secure streets.
The Kensington drug market has plagued the city
for too long. Those days are over. Okay.
You think that's what it's about? Even if
it is what the go they're aiming at,
do you what the precedent sets. They can
do what they want. Wherever they want, they
yell drugs. It's no different than what they've
been doing with terror and ISIS and Al
Qaeda everywhere in the world for a very
long time. When president Trump told us to
go get them, he wasn't kidding, and neither
were we.
Massive, multi location drug raid,
yeah, in people's homes. Remember what happened in
Chicago with that building they claimed they were
breaking down in trying to get a rago
hot spot. It turned out that there was
one person who was even linked to that,
and I questioned that link.
Well, let's just even say they were a
leader of the gang. What you did to
that building,
bomb flash grenade bombs in babies' rooms and
all sorts of crazy things that were broadly
reported,
zip tying down, spending billions of dollars, whatever
the hell you use to get to arrest
one guy who was not even part of
the because they're linked to the gang, which
to them means anything.
It was a scare tactic. It was about
or a show for the team, look at
what we're doing, zip ties and all the
big PR marketing with all the you know,
that's what they're doing. They're trying to go,
look who we are. At the end of
the day, they violated tons of people's rights,
and they got one guy they say is
linked to the thing, and they go, yay,
we won. Now, I'm not talking about I'm
sure there were other people they arrested for
immigration.
The point was what they yelled in regard
to Trende Aragua to make that all make
sense. And that turned out to be a
lie. Same thing with what we're talking about
here, especially when we realize that it's not
their constitutional reality to come in and tell
you what you can and can't consume. You
realize that so many people are arresting people
for cannabis right now? Cannabis.
That's always been going on. The Republican side's
always made an issue about that, and Trump's
team has been rolling that back behind the
scenes.
But guys recognize what this means. Using things
that are not constitutionally valid. They are rushing
into buildings, doing whatever they want. They're just
yelling drugs. Right now, they are literally killing
people in the ocean because they say they're
doing something.
No different than the immigration lies they've been
spinning. What if what happens if there's an
American person on these boats? They don't even
maybe there was maybe he was a stowaway.
Maybe he caught the boat right before he
left.
See, the process is how you could avoid
things like that. But on top of that,
they're get they're creating the idea that they
can start bombing people anywhere, maybe on the
land as Trump just said.
You may think this sounds ridiculous, but if
you've been paying attention at all from the
moment I mean, probably ever, to be honest.
But since Trump has taken power, you need
to recognize by now that he is capable
of something just like that. And then I
think it frankly suits the interest of the
empire,
whoever is in power, for Trump to keep
doing this so they can hand the baton
to the left side team that continues the
same agenda. Because that's the way this counterbalance
seems to work today.
It's just sad. It's so sad that we
have people that actually are tricked by this
and people that seem to pretend they're helping
people while they're out there enriching themselves and
literally destroying everything for the status quo.
So I'll leave you with another great clip.
I that's why I got the image from
today
from going underground. And you've seen this before.
I think I've even played this before. This
is this is the whole
economic hit band overlap.
But in regard to Venezuela, rather South America
and the idea of as, CIA's Operation Condor,
which I argue, you know, we've ongoing
discussion, ongoing agendas that are coming still from
this administration.
And let's not forget how much Israel is
literally puppeteering
the outcome, the actions of this government today.
So I'll leave you with this clip as
he writes, if you want to understand why
The US is about to launch regime change
war on Venezuela,
watch this. It's the same story as every
other regime change war to expand The US
economic empire and have American corporations dominate the
world. Now I will lastly argue
that what this video will show is something
that I very
much, to this moment, think is part of
that. But I think it's bigger than that
too. This is sort of the,
you know, neocon kind of war on terror.
You know, that was and it's still very
much part of what's happening. But I think
we're in a different like, the rare earth
rare earth minerals elements, part of it is
much more prominent right now than it was
before. And and you've got the Israel dynamic
has changed a lot of what's going on.
I just want you to think about, like,
this part is is very clear part of
it, but really take away from it that
the government
will use its own personal interest or interest
of its of its, you know, not its
constituents, but its backers
to drive its actions
almost always at the expense of the American
people or whoever they claim they're fighting for.
No different than what's literally happening right now,
and I think is beginning to happen with
Venezuela.
So thank you for tuning in. I appreciate
all your support. As always, we put this
workout for free because we believe in what
we're doing, and we believe it's more important
that you have access to this and all
the source material for you to look at
whether or not you believe you wanna financially
support this platform. But if you do take
value from this because we do it for
free, we do need your support. So show
me what it's worth to you. Show me
what you think the work is worth and
help us continue to grow.
I love you all. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
To create the world's first truly global empire.
And it's basically a secret empire. We do
it many ways, but but but principally,
we identify a country that has resources our
corporations covet like oil, range a huge loan
to that country from the World Bank or
one of its sisters. The money never actually
goes to the country. It goes to our
own corporations to build the infrastructure projects in
that country that help a few very wealthy
people,
but don't benefit the majority of the people
who are too poor to buy electricity or
have cars to drive on the highways. And
yet they're left holding a huge debt that
they can't repay.
So we go back at some point and
say, you know, you can't pay your debts.
Give us a pound of flesh. Sell your
oil real cheap to our oil companies.
Vote with us on the next critical UN
vote. Allow us to build a military base
in your backyard.
Something along these lines. And when we fail,
the jackals go in and either overthrow or
assassinate
these leaders. And if the jackals fail as
they did in in in Iraq, then they'll
be sent in the military.
I don't think the failure is capitalism. I
think it's a specific kind of capitalism
that we've developed. We've created what I consider
a mutant
viral form of capitalism.
And this mutant form of capitalism, which I
think is really a predatory form of capitalism,
has created an extremely
unstable, unsustainable,
unjust, and and very, very dangerous world.
I've met a lot of terrorists. I've interviewed
them for books. I've never met one who
wanted to be a terrorist. They're desperate people.
If we wanna get rid of terrorism,
we must get rid of the root causes,
that cancer
that is destroying,
our whole system. Because I think it's really
important that we understand today, we cannot have
homeland security
unless we understand that the whole planet
is our homeland.