My father told me when I was a
child,
people in authority lie.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 10/05/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Well, a
very important story to report on today that
is something that has been developing,
you know, that we've been covering from a
very
broad two party illusion perspective.
Now I I I contemplated starting the show
today in a sort of a,
you know, I guess, a skit or a
a play
as if because of the story we're gonna
discuss, we now know that it proves the
other side.
But I felt like it was more important
just to be straightforward as always. But the
point would have been to sort of, you
know, lay out how clearly it may feel
like it makes sense,
but recognize the principle, the you know, the
the reality of why saying that these two
girls were gonna discuss today that were ran
over by a person who's on video saying
that at least in some degree, the pea
the reason that they were talking s h
I t, saying bad things about Charlie Kirk
was why he ultimately ran them over with
his car. It's a developing story. So as
always, there's things that could change up in
the air, but
what's interesting is, I mean, I've already seen
people come out and do the from from
the left, I guess, if you you know,
I from what you can glean, from what
you see them say online, which is not
necessarily verifiable. Right? That's my point in a
lot of this is that people have I
mean, I'm a good example of that, which
is why I was kinda kinda thinking about
starting that way is that people seem to
place me. But as you watch this show
long enough, you'll recognize that I my principle
is what I what guides me, and it's
depending on the topic, it's kind of all
over the place. That's how I think it
should be for everybody.
But what I see is people now pointing
at this story and saying, we knew it.
It's really the right. They're the real terrorists,
and they're the which is, in my opinion,
the exact same problem.
Just as problematic, just as alarming, ex despite
the I guess, except for the fact that
there's momentum right now around the right with
Trump and the Republicans in in power. You
know, of course, unless you recognize that it's
really one government. My point is from the
individuals who buy into that, there's momentum there.
Either way, it's the same problem. Creating the
idea that there that well, first of all,
that parts of this country just who have
political ideas that are different are terrorists or
the problem or need to be removed or
censored or change their minds in some way,
all the things that would be called out
if the other side was doing the same
thing. And then, you know, as well as
the fact that it builds to allow the
government to create the air of that and
then apply it to anyone they want, to
censor, to do any number of things.
So it's a it is a very important
and quite alarming story today. And it's important
to stress from the beginning that we'll go
through this in regard to what you may
think his political standing is, and I don't
think as always you can prove it unless
there's some obvious connection. There's clear, you know,
suggestive points, which, you know, are especially with
this
political conversation tend to be pretty, you know,
somewhat accurate. But you can't claim you'd know
for a fact that someone is a republican
or is a democrat or even let alone
part of some network organized version of those
things, which is not the same as most
people that they're calling some terrorist network across
the country.
You can't know this for sure. Whether or
not they like Trump or had a Trump
flag, it's still this is subjective today, and
it's guiding a lot of people who think
they're the highest level of this conversation, and
it's it's alarming.
But this this person we'll talk about, it's
pretty clear that he you know,
the way that this the online
community works around this, it's easy to see
that people fall into certain idea, which by
the way, the reality is freedom of speech,
your freedom of ideology, freedom to look at
what you want. But we know that the
way that these things operate, I argue because
of the way this is kind of set
up, because of the driving people into dark
corners of this on purpose, because of censorship,
that people end up falling into things that
I think are sort of engineered that way.
Not even to say that that's what this
kid was, but we'll get into the alarming
point of this story and why it is
the continuation
of the same problem.
That, you know, if, indeed, this person did
do this because they were saying bad things
about Charlie Kirk, it doesn't then make the
other side justified. It doesn't make the fur
all it shows you is that this is
the reason we can't allow the peep the
the government to
I mean, to what's the best way to
say it? The government
to put us in positions where we essentially
see each other as the problem as opposed
to the government that's censoring in the general
sense whatever side we're pointing to. And just
to care that well, you know, we'll we'll
get into it all as we go through
it, but then it's just we we're losing
a bit of our humanity through all of
this. Just the empathy that we should all
have. That's not some woke lefty thing. Like,
it's just crazy the way that our politics
break our logic and just who we are
as a species,
but that we should just care, whether it's
immigration or anybody else. You can decide in
what way or if at all that circumvents
or is more important than the law. That's
an individual point for you to decide. But
we can't lose our empathy and care about
you know, whether whether it's a
war criminal president that has committed atrocities around
the world, I still say I make that
joke all the time. You know, somebody like
that passes and you go, well, it makes
or more better way to say it is
something like Biden who makes this clumsy mistake
and it's like, you feel bad because he's
an old guy, but then you go, yeah,
but he's a war criminal. So kinda, you
know but I still care at the end
of the day, and that's what really matters
that I'm hoping we can all recognize is
that we all and I, you know, and
as I always argue, I think most of
us are in that in that camp, and
that they're so desperate to drive us into
positions where we lose that because it's easier
to manipulate us. But we're gonna talk about
that as a kind of a large part
of the story today of what this story
is and how it connects to what's going
on in this country. And then make a
very, very clear connected point to what I
think is the largest driving force of that
within this country and to some degree, why.
But we're gonna go over some points around
Israel and the Freedom Flotilla that I want
you to see, as well as the updates
on the illusion of the ceasefire, which has
never really stopped, the infiltration point, some points
around two party illusion. And the real big
connected point, I think, is the digital ID
surveillance.
Just it's it's expanding in such a way
that is
there's so much happening right now at one
time that it's very easy to miss how
much of this continues to change every single
day. From around the world, digital IDs, UK,
EU in general, just on a rapid scale
when it comes to that, surveillance,
digital money.
But how that all I mean, it's impossible
to decouple that global conversation
from the group committing the most obvious, brazen
genocide I've ever seen in my life as
well as the fact that they seem to
be proud of it. I'm talking about the
Zionist Israeli government and companies that they run
through their intelligence that are now being used
to arm
and, you know, basically facilitate what ICE is
doing in this country.
All sorts of Israeli spyware now being used
on Americans that are directly tied back to
their unit 8,200 companies, and you can prove
throughout history that they've used those to siphon
off information that don't care about your rights,
don't care about the government. And this is
happening everywhere. And then we'll, of course, talk
about a very important point around
the the I mean, continuation of that throughout
ICE's deployment and then some points around what
is ultimately happening, possibly Portland, Illinois, and that
conversation. As well as in the next show,
we'll get into some more immigration that I
pulled off for today that I think is
important. You're pretty well versed on where the
Garcia point and everything else. Just in case
you didn't see the update, we'll get into
the next show.
Another court ruling came out and called the
smuggling charge.
Vindictive was the word they used. Remember, the
DHS came out with their tweet saying after
they ruled they could be deported.
Has everything else they claim from MS 13
to smuggling, human trafficking, rapists, they've made all
of this up. And the court I mean,
there's elements like, for example, the wife calling,
but the reality of the evidence they're pointing
to is completely absent, and it's come out
every single time they've gone in front of
court. And then they win in regard to
or it's not it's they get a positive
step toward removing him, and then they post
that he's all of these things, rapist, MS
13. That's the Department of Homeland Security.
I mean, these people are children the way
that they're responding. I mean, there's anyway, we'll
get to that more in the few in
in the next show, but realize that this
is the these are people we're dealing with.
If you think that's unique to one side
or the other, you're missing the plot here.
The reality is our government has been diminishing
in a really obvious way in this recent
so many years, but for quite a long
time. So let's get into why. Now before
we get into everything today, I wanna start
off with shouting some a couple points out
again. I forgot to mention
I mean, we were talking about the free
speech episode yesterday, and I really just wanna
make sure you guys don't miss some of
the newer shirts that we have on here.
This one's in particular, the free speech absolutist
shirt, which is one of my favorites. I
wear it all over the place. I support
the last American bag on the back. Really,
just the idea of showing people, you know,
that this is a a line for you.
It's a principled line. It's not you don't
I mean, you shouldn't even need to say
absolutist. Free speech is what that means. But
weirdly enough, people have these weird dividing lines
about where free speech ends, and so, apparently,
they don't understand what free speech means. Right?
Plenty of other things on here, different colors
as well, but
Big Frog, the platform, shout out to them.
Lots of shirts you can get here. And
by the way, including on the website, some
of the all the other shirts as well.
Now I just went yesterday. Had a great
a great,
I guess, it was called Farm and Fellowship.
Crossing Creek Farms in Shelbyview, Tennessee. Now I've
been there many times, and I've overlapped. Catherine
Austin Fitz is a big advocate for the
location. And so when she comes in town,
I I tend to see her there, and
we meet and, you know, support this farm.
And I've never really brought it up I've
in I I think I've mentioned it more
in the past, but it's it's it's in
Tennessee. And such since we have a global
audience, I tend to you know, my point
is I really wanna make sure we're shouting
them out for those that are in Tennessee.
This has gotta be one of the most
this forum is doing all the right things
for all the right reasons and paying the
price for it like many are today. We
were just there yesterday. They were talking about,
they had a person from, West and a
Price talking about whole milk and the legalities
around it and what's going on around the
country.
And just had a really great overall conversation.
Catherine was interviewed about the digital ID. We
she referenced my totalitarian tiptoe.
The this I'll just show you really quickly.
Oh, I have it up already. This what
what I did for her platform,
which was really just a a shortened version
of my totalitarian
technocrat, excuse me, tiptoe, play on David Icke's
totalitarian tiptoe episode about all that information.
The point is that we were there. We
talked about all of that stuff. All all
that's to say is that this forum
is going out of its way to do
everything it can to help people all across
the country
for all for whether for when it comes
to anything around the health conversation. I mean,
everyone you name. You know, my point is
just make sure people like this, groups like
this,
you're supporting.
Whether you're in Tennessee or not, find something,
you know, groups that are connected, groups that
are doing the same thing in your area,
or Steve talks about with, Slim in regard
to the in regard to Meet. And it's
about doing these things the right way.
And, of course, we're being penalized for it.
Like with my platform, what we do, we
get penalized for doing things the right way
for the right reasons because that's what they're
afraid of, power structures. Overall,
go out of your way.
Drive a little bit extra if it means
helping them buying food from their location, spending
a little bit more. Because at the end
of the day, it as Catherine was saying
in this recent conversation, you know,
a lot of people
speak out loud and generally gen genuinely
want to push back against the control grid
and what's coming,
but yet then invest in things that help
that. Right? Then continue to use the groups
that fund things that we don't like and,
you know, and then act like we're all
against it. You gotta we have to start
self reflecting on the choices we make day
in and day out, the money we use,
vote with your dollar, and whether whether it
goes to the right people for the right
reasons and people that are actively fighting for
the vision of the world that we want
in every facet of our lives. And I
know it's not that simple. There's many different
things in our lives that may make that
complicated. All I'm saying is do your best
to try in this kind of direction.
One last thing on that note I just
thought it was point to point out are
two things, actually. Thomas Massey said the best
thing about government shutdowns,
no chemtrails.
Now whether that's entirely accurate or not, I
I noticed the same thing,
Zero. Even though it's almost every single day
where we are, weird how that said, look
at, well, what does that show you? Yeah.
We're we're being lied to as we I
think literally everybody with a brain knows. I
mean, it's been admitted for the most part,
but the idea that they pretend like that's,
oh, contrails or whatever, no, no, they're they're,
you know.
Anyway,
stopping, I guess, but the bottom line is
it will continue because they don't care about
the legislation. And I think it is, to
some degree, still happening in places where this
is, you know, black budget, whatever else. But
it's a port an important point to think
about. There are a lot of things that
we don't like that happen every single day
that are outside. They're illegal, quite frankly, and
we don't vote for, but
it's clear to see the mechanism through which
those things can stop.
Think about that for a second. Now that
may seem crazy to some people, but I
think there's a world in which we can
envision in the future where we might not
need to deal with some overarching,
all encompassing government shadowy figure that tells us
how to live our lives for your benefit,
of course. Of Of course, even talking about
that despite being in the constitution that we
can alter or abolish it should it be
against our interests,
those things are labeled as terrorist stuff today.
Also think about that. And whether that shows
you or people believing too much in the
constitution being labeled domestic terrorists. Those are all
real things. What does that show you about
the group that are making those decisions? To
me, that they're not in your interest and
clearly don't even believe in the things that
we think are foundational to this country.
Thomas Massie also points out the government is
shut down, but the house refuses to go
back into session. Mike Johnson.
Why are we in recess? Because the day
we go back into session, I have 218
votes for the discharge petition to force a
vote on releasing the Epstein files. Right now,
in my opinion, they are doing every single
thing they can to make that 217,
so it won't happen.
Watch.
Watch as one of those Republicans get pressured
or threatened.
My my opinion. And suddenly, by the time
this comes back, he won't have the votes.
I hope so. I support this entirely, but
I think you know what I'm getting at.
Now let's talk about this opening story that
I think is very important. First, a couple
of things that I wanted you guys to
see.
Now this is something we I posted today.
I was gonna share this the other day
with regard to free speech,
but but this is something Charlie Kirk put
out back in March 4 before he passed.
President Trump lays down the new rules on
campus protests.
No more federal funding for schools that allow
illegal protest to continue.
Well, none of those were illegal. They're illegal
because they claim Palestinian support is terrorism, and
now they've made that somewhat legal even though
it's unconstitutional.
Foreign students sent home. He says American students
expelled. Pretty simple. 100%
not free speech. That is a unconstitutional
suppression of speech. As the Supreme Court can
as ruled many times,
like we recently saw with the FCC point,
if they go do something or else and
then they make a decision, that's still suppression
from the government. That's been roundly upheld in
many different conversations. And it says, and no
masks to hide identities of criminals. Oh, except
lots of ice, I guess. And that's okay
today.
This, as I said,
as much as it may upset some, is
not what being a free speech absolutist looks
like. I still, nonetheless, feel that Charlie was
shifting his opinions around Israel, and as,
Candace would argue, around his faith.
And believe and change shifting around his opinions
and beliefs before he died, and it is
very much my opinion that that the most
likely reality is that he was killed because
of it. That's my opinion. But I think
it's important to note that though. Right? Is
that he is he'll like I said, he
stands up and says absolute free speech, and
then Bondi comes out and says
censorship because it's not free speech. And that's
an insanely contradictory point using his name for
something he was very adamant about not supporting.
But my point is, here's an example where
he was not absolute, where he made a
line because of politics, I argue. But if
you ask him in any other conversation and
you find those conversations out there, he draws
no lines. Except this is my point is
that when it comes to politics, people get
swayed. They get manipulated. They get leaned on.
Being be independent in all things. Doesn't mean
you can't believe and support, but to pretend
you know, to
put your lot in with some kind of
larger group and then feel like you're bound
to what they largely think is only going
to drive you away from what you, you
know, from your principles, from what you believe
in.
So, Stephen Miller,
I can show you, as you well know,
hundreds of these posts for people in the
government, mind you.
He says the issue before
is now the the issue before us now,
he he went to write, is very simple
and clear. There is a large and growing
movement of left wing terrorists terrorism in the
country.
Now even just that statement,
I could very clearly prove to you that
there's all sorts of weird intelligence and just
radical groups, I guess, that exist in this
country on both sides of the paradigm. It's
not very secret. What I call that terrorism,
not even close. What I call that a
network, not even close. Unless we're talking about
the intelligence apparatus, which is always there. And
if you're pay attention, Antifa, Patriot Front, there's
connections to all of these things. I've proven
this on the show. I never argue with
every single one of them because many of
them just believe these things, and they get
used by the government, by the ADL. It's
very public, guys.
But my point here is that for him
to say this
and make the case that have you proven
this, Stephen Miller?
Does some some adviser to Homeland Security is
now running the country, it seems, superseding Marco
Rubio? Because that's totally normal.
The reality here is that this is something
he's stating to create motion around something that
no one has verified. The idea that there's
some I mean, and on top of that,
most of them try to play it a
little bit smart and make it seem like
we only mean these ones. He comes out
and says left terrorist. Left wing, all terrorists,
radical lunatics because he has an interest, I
think, in absolutely
destroying this country.
He's always the one that takes it a
little bit too far, a very Zionist of
him because that's what he is publicly, admittedly.
That shouldn't be something we're proud about today.
And if, of course, if you're new to
the show and you somehow still think that
means
the homeland for the Jews, you've been buying
the narrative that a lot of Jewish people
today are beginning to scream have been lied
about. Like I pointed out the other day,
Seth Rogen, for example, comes out and goes,
we've been lied our entire lives. A major
mainstream person or plenty of commentators. I don't
trust any of them. The point is, it's
obvious to see that momentum.
People in politics, people in media suddenly going,
okay.
Genocide. We can can't deny it now. Yeah.
Very brave after a year and a half.
The point, though, is that the whole world
sees it. The reality is he's trying to
drive this to destroy the country. And he
goes, it is well organized and funded. Okay.
Can you no. That is even more important.
That means evidence, doesn't it? What do you
mean by that? Well organized, funded, prove it.
You wanna point to George Soros? I'm not
gonna deny that, but make your case, Stephen
Miller. None of them have. It's a narrative
game that they use to then roll out
and do things wherever they want, apparently. Maybe
Illinois today, Portland, whatever, ICE, maybe, National Guard,
we'll figure it out. No real structure except
narrative and action, which ends up being the
same old, same old if you've been paying
attention longer than thirty seconds.
And it says, and it is shielded by
far left Democrat judges. Okay. Now you're accusing
the judiciary of something. Can you prove that?
If I were them, I would be going,
that's liable. But he doesn't make it their
names. That's probably why. But it says they
only remedy is is to use legitimate state
power
to dismantle terrorism in networks. So this is
the war on terror come home like we've
been telling you for decades.
That was always the plan if you pay
attention, and now he's simply telling you, look
at that big bad thing we can't define.
Use state power to rush through and deal
with it, and we'll tell you how it
settles. What do you think is gonna happen
when that goes on, even if they're actually
going after Democrats if you think that's the
problem?
Yeah. The country will look quite a bit
different when we're done. It's happening right in
front of us right now. The point is
that Stephen Miller is absolutely going left wing
terrorism.
Now when they go, he said fascist. He's
driving in violence. Now I'm never going to
argue that him saying this means I'm that
he's responsible for other people doing fill in
the blank. It does not matter. As much
as this guy, this lazy eyed sociopath who's
absolutely trying to cause violence, in my opinion,
I would still argue he's not legally responsible
for what other people do. In what world
did we ever make that case? Somebody else
does something over there, and now I'm somehow
legally accountable? I don't care if I was
going, go do that.
You could make a case personally where you
can go, I'm suing you because clearly you
did this, or the local air the person
who runs the business can say, I watched
that happen. I'm suing you, and the judge
can decide. But government stepping in to argue
you're guilty for somebody else's actions, we never
should have made that case.
Fire in a theater. I don't care. I
mean, I I'll even include this again since
this is where we really get into that
nuance.
The recent converse oh, that's the
one. Oops. Here's the odyssey.
Because the conversation I mean, I think and
this is not something I think this needs
to be a conversation we have as individuals,
as countries, as as community
because the the reality is that this is
the that's the free speech reality. That's it.
Period.
Now maybe people disagree. That's why I keep
talking about it. Maybe this is why it
can't be some hate you because you have
a different opinion conversation.
My point at the end of the day
is always is that Stephen Miller, whether he's
trying to or not, is not responsible for
that. But I'm trying to highlight the fact
that everything they're saying is being done aggressively
on the right right now.
So young, Mike Young simply says, Stephen cries
left wing terror while ignoring the FBI's own
stats. Yes. Threats exist, but swinging state power
like a sledgehammer at neighbors is paranoia, not
patriotism.
Real strength is protecting democracy for all. Now
whatever you think about that,
the reality is that
the stats, I also argue, are wildly manipulated.
But he's not wrong. You could look. And
it's what's what's so embarrassing. They if they
if they were so absolute about this, they
wouldn't be deleting studies from the DOJ that
showed you right wing was more of where
the terror came from or whatever they call
that. Again, let's be clear. That is a
lot of red hats. That is a lot
of people holding certain signs. That's people being
part of trucker convoys. We already talked about
this back then. It's a the the the
attention span of a housefly this country has.
We miss it because we're looking immediately to
where they want us to look.
Back then, the ADL made this huge sprawling
case about how right wing people were vanilla
ISIS terrorists because they had certain ideas. It
built up the numbers, and they made all
these studies for it. And and there's examples
you can prove and you can't deny. Same
with the left. Now the same thing's being
done. Give it a couple years. I'm sure
the ADL will have a whole bunch of
new studies claiming left wing is the problem.
The reality is it's based on lies. Like,
Palestinian support, we can prove this. So it's
really hard to tell for sure, but the
point's the same. It's funny how they'll ignore
their own information and scream the one thing
without proving it to you. That seems pretty
clear. Whatever side you think it's on, recognize
dishonesty
when it's staring you in the face. Recognize
people using things they're creating to create an
outcome.
So here is what Mario shared, and trust
me. We're gonna go through this in-depth with
articles,
follow-up information,
an interesting post from Reddit
per actual provable information downloaded directly from their
YouTube before they deleted it, and a whole
bunch of other stuff showing you and all
of his social medias, by the way,
and some other interesting things.
This is from, Inside Edition, it looks like.
Let's play the clip first.
And this is the base basically breaking down
the story for you. And this person framed
it, Charlie Kirk's little cult just hit a
new level of deranged. See, this is a
person very much coming from the one side
of the paradigm.
But I don't I don't disagree. This kid
seems a little bit, you know, you'll you'll
see. Let's play the clip first.
Miles per hour. That's how fast cops say
a 17 year old was driving when he
mowed down two teen girls riding on an
ebike.
Now video has surfaced of the suspect shortly
after the crash laughing on a gaming site.
It's the creepy laugh of an accused killer.
We're learning new information about 17 year old
Vincent Batteloro,
accused of intentionally
slamming his Jeep into two best friends as
they rode an ebike.
According to just released court papers, police say
he was driving 70 miles an hour when
he plowed into 17 year olds, Maria Niodis
and Isabella Salas.
We found this video of Batteloro on a
gaming site talking about pranking Maria by sending
a pizza to her house. She reportedly had
spurned his advances and had filed for a
restraining order against him. Hi. Can I place
an order for delivery, please?
Can I get two large pepperoni pizzas?
It'll be cash at the door. He then
lets out
that demonic laugh. He tells viewers it's all
because allegedly Maria had made fun of Charlie
Kirk. Whenever
Maria
sees the pizza guy come, better think of
Charlie Kirk for making fun of his death.
Stupid clown. A fellow gamer asks if he'll
drive to Maria's house to watch For the
podcast, that's a video of him saying that.
So there's really no denying that that was
said. The question is whether or not you
feel that this was the intention, which that's
for course to decide. Pizza be delivered. Oh,
I did that the last time,
but the mother saw me pull up in
the car. And I got tracked, and the
police, you know, did what they did. Batalauro
made the video nine days ago. On Monday,
when the two girls were killed, police say
Batalauro
fled the scene before they found and detained
him and issued him an astonishing
15 tickets, but he was not arrested because
he claimed it was an accident.
The next day, Batteloro went online to express
his condolences.
In a neighboring town,
unfortunately,
two girls were killed in a
hit and run crash. I wish my sincerest
condolences.
On Wednesday, after police discovered his connections to
Maria Neotis, he was arrested and charged with
first degree murder.
Last night, Maria's mother spoke out. She wasn't
just my daughter.
She was my best friend,
my sunshine.
The families of both victims released a joint
statement calling the suspect a coward of a
man who had been plotting the attack for
months.
Interesting.
Well, what's first thoughts, and this is interesting
to me that, you know, apparently, as I
read the article next, he was
can
related to somebody higher up in the police
department, but not immediately related, sort of like
a cousin or something like that. But I
do find it strange the way this went
down where he was ultimately let go despite
the evidence that was clearly linked to him.
Like he said, accident, but, I mean, really?
Somebody people are in the hospital about to
die, if not already dead, and you're getting
relief? That that's hard to wrap my mind
around. Now we'll get into this a little
bit more. Oh, he also just points out
that he's you can you know, who knows
if this is him making it up or
not? But I do so I get similar
things. I think anybody doing this and I
think are largely people who are being seen
as a threat to all sides or, you
know, probably more likely, but people get it
from the other you know? It it shows
you the the engineered hatred coming from within
the the two party division as well as
just people that are wanting to drive that
because this very well could be an Israeli
bot for all we know, but it says,
you're a dead man walking to the guy
posting this.
So this is from today.
What we know about the 17 year old
Cranford, New Jersey hit and run suspect.
Says a 17 year old boy is facing
first degree murder charges in New Jersey after
he allegedly struck and killed two teenage girls
in a hit hit and
run. Vincent Battilorio
Battilorio.
Isn't that what they just said? I thought
that's what they said. Battiloro.
Did they say Loro? Maybe I'm misremembering. Battiloro
is accused of intentionally driving an SUV into
17
into 17 year old friends, Maria Notis and
Isabella Salas
before allegedly ditching the car and fleeing the
scene.
That Delauro was allegedly driving at least 70
miles per hour
hour in a 25 mile per hour zone
when the fatal crash occurred Monday evening on
Burnside Avenue in Cranford according to the court
records. Police said Battalouro
abandoned the black 2021
Jeep Compass after striking Neo Neotis
and Salas and fled the scene. He was
detained for questioning
that evening and, apparently, bunch of tickets they
claim in that report, given tickets,
and released pending further investigation,
then arrested the next morning, police said. The
victim's relatives and friends claimed Battilora was stalking
one of the girls,
and and a restraining order had been filed
against him before the crash. The Union County,
county prosecutor's office, which is crash, did not
immediately respond to CBS News,
New York's request for verifying their claims.
Now you can see how easy it would
be to say this guy's a Republican. This
guy's going after people because they said things
about Charlie. Well, the the Charlie point is
you can't dispute that. But do you know
his motivation? Do you know if that was
it because he was a Republican? But it's
easy. This is the same thing we saw
far too many very influential Republicans do in
the moments after many things that turned out
even to be the opposite, like a Robinson,
like a shoot the Dallas shooting, like many
examples where they screech that we know it's
left wing terrorism before they even had a
person in in custody.
So the point is don't be like that.
The same thing the left is doing now
in this situation or plenty of others.
Don't fall in the trap.
It's easy to want to make people like
those idiots saying those things on both sides
look stupid because they deserve to. But don't
fall into the trap. Don't go for the
low hanging fruit. Be objective.
Break it down for what it means. And
so in this case, I think what's important
to recognize
is this person took this action, and so,
obviously, you should be held accountable. And if
if we're going to argue that this was
something more than that, then that needs to
be proven. And I think it matters that
we can point out that if it was
Charlie Kirk and that argument that was what
drove this, you could make a clear argument
that he was
worked up by people online saying go after
like Laura Loomer, go go after these people
for saying things about Charlie. Now would I
say it's Laura's fault or rather legal responsibility
that that person was killed? No.
Never.
That's not how this works.
Because how do how do you know that
that's what Laura meant if she says go
after them? Maybe she meant videotape them. The
point is it's irrelevant.
But you should recognize that that does have
an effect just like you can say from
the other side of people going, you know,
if somebody's going out and saying, take them
out because they're fascist, well, yeah, that might
drive someone to take irrational action. That would
be their responsibility, though, on top of the
fact or aside from the fact that both
sides are very obviously asking, acting
in fascist ways.
But continuing,
the victim's relatives and friends claimed Bataalora was
stalking one of the girls. Later in a
video streamed to his YouTube channel sometime after
the crash, a young man speaks about the
case and claims he was bullied. Quote, I've
been bullied, ridiculed, and and stuff over false
allegations. Okay? I think this was him trying
to before he was arrested, making it sound
like I think he was trying to build
the idea that he wasn't guilty because he
think he might thought he might have gotten
away with it over the whole thing about
things that have happened in the past. There's
more of the story. It'll come
out in the future. False allegations being the
point, kinda floating that. Or as we'll find
out in a second, he went on and
gave his condolences about what happened, this terrible
thing, and not claiming
that he did it before that all happened.
I think that's clearly him thinking he's gonna
get away with it and trying to create
the narrative that
he was, you know, just an accident, and
I'm sorry it happened, and so on. So
new details in the suspect hit and run.
Family of Maria,
Neotis says they've been stalking him for months.
It says the family said that he'd been
stalking him for months, that they had reported
on his behavior to local police with no
response.
I found that interesting
because they remember the family connection. And it
says in a statement to Fox five, the
family said that this was the murder in
the first degree and that he'd been planning,
plotting the attack for months.
Carried out this horrific attack,
taking not only her life but also her
friends. Quote, I wanna be clear. This is
the police,
what was he? The police just a police
officer, I guess. He says, I wanna be
clear. As loud and as firm as possible
that in no way do my wife, children,
or I condone, defend, or excuse the actions
that caused this terrible, and tragic loss of
life. I just I don't know why it
bothers me so much that we anybody even
has to say that. Like, I understand, like,
he's trying to make it clear, like, I'm
not involved. I'm not trying to help this
guy. You know? Let justice take its course.
But I just hate this weird political game.
I condone the thing that's bad.
First of all,
if somebody doesn't care or maybe they celebrate
the bad thing, do do you think they
can't come out and be like, I condone
it and secretly celebrate it? We know that
happens. So my point is why do we
feel compelled to come out and be like,
I wanna make it clear. I do not
condone who the hell would publicly condone something
like this? Who in most cases does
other than terrible people. But they exist. We
know that. My point is that it's just
so frustrating that we have to you should
broadly assume that somebody doesn't agree with murder.
I'd like to believe that's most people in
the world. Overall, I just think it's frustrating
because it just feels fake now because it's
always this thing. And if you don't stand
up and go, I condemn the thing, they
secretly go, oh, he must love it.
It's politics, guys. It's just such a childish
game. Anyway, his largest point in that I
think is to come out and be like,
look, we're not taking, you know, pulling strings
for the guy. And it says, I do
unequivocally condemn the actions of the accused. And
like you, I demand that he face consequences.
It's such unnecessary statements.
But it says,
the main point was continuing to say, Full
faith in the justice system. This will work
out.
Meanwhile, Vincent Battilaro himself took to social media
the day after the crash when after they
let him go. In a twenty minute livestream
before his arrest, he talked about the crash
without acknowledging his role in it. He claimed
there had been a lot of misinformation,
sharing about him being bullied.
Now here's where it got interesting.
This is
a random,
r Destiny,
Reddit subreddit,
and it says and the title is the
Tate and Kirk fan, which you can prove,
I'll try in a second, stalked and killed
two teen girls. Why isn't the mainstream media
or Democrats talking about this? I find that
really fascinating as always, just like the other
points you made. If we're to be told,
like, from a Jones, for example, that it's
the Democrat deep state, and they'll do everything
they can at any moment to go after
people like Trump and the right, the Republicans.
There's so many examples where you can prove
that's a flimsy false statement. In some cases,
sure. And in most cases, there's never accountability.
Well, I should get to a section on
that today despite the narrative. Get Nancy Pelosi.
Yay. He's talking about her. Where's the
action? Forever. Who cares? He said her name,
and we hate her. The point is that,
clearly, there's examples where Democrats
have a slam dunk. Usually, I could point
out foreign policy, for example. Look. He's a
war criminal. He did this legal thing, and
nobody says a word because they all either
support it or know they're each guilty of
the same thing.
But in this case, why wouldn't you see
this overwhelming push to be like, oh my
god. Look. A republican killed that person. It
may happen. Maybe they just haven't caught wind
of it. But it makes me wonder
if the larger agenda is to make this
one way. And that all of them ultimately
know that, it's worth thinking about. But it
says recently, you you may have seen this
clip making the rounds
where a 17 year old kid expresses his
sincerest condolences and that we have the the
audio at the very least,
To the family of the two girls, and
it says, those who were unaware, as per
the New York Post reporting,
two 17 year old girls, Maria Neotis, Isabella
Salas, in New Jersey were biking when they
were rammed by a 2021
black Jeep by the aforementioned 17 year old.
Both of them died in the hospital. Were
but back to Laurel fled the scene and
is now arrested and charged with two degrees
of first degree murder.
And it says,
his TikTok, which I have up here, is
now unfortunately private, but his profile picture supports
a 2021 black jeep with jersey plates. And
it says his Twitter has been inactive since
2023, but contains multiple retweets of Andrew Tate.
Now here this is the private now. Now
I guarantee this always happens by the platforms.
This, Twitter, they delete it as fast as
they can. Why does that happen these days?
I think I you can come to your
conclusions. I have a very clear suspicion why.
But here is his Twitter account, which is
still up, at least right at least it
was when I started.
And then here's an older one that they
also had, but just an extra one, which
is also his account that goes back even
further. Not really much engagement, but you can
prove more than one example of him, you
know, supporting get the Tates out of jail
and supporting Tate Kirk, same kinda thing. So
as always, I could be just like the
right is in subjective like, he's got a
mask on. He must be the left by
saying it's most like I would say, he's
a right republican because of those things. Well,
is it likely? I find it hard to
believe a lefty would be supported, but who
knows, guys? We shouldn't be childish like two
party illusionists. We should be questioning the objective.
It's likely with those things, but we don't
know for sure. And it says
on his Instagram, he follows JD Vance, Melania
Trump, Donald
Donald j Trump, team Trump. So you're saying
same thing. It's pretty far more likely. I
think it's an obvious good guess that he's
probably a Republican. But if we're gonna be
objective, we should not say we know that
for a fact. But you can simply go
look. All the evidence shows he's likely a
Republican. I wouldn't disagree with that statement. That's
not what they do. They come out and
go, we know he's Republican right wing terror.
It's not what you should do. And even
then, is it terrorism, or is this guy
just a an impressionable kid who got manipulated
by, who knows, intelligence, propaganda? Maybe he's crazy?
Antidepressants?
Wartime propaganda? I mean, who knows today, guys?
It's so many things to converge to make
people do that. I think people snap, and
I think that's part of the game that
our government genuinely drives, or we can get
into neuroweapons and neuroscience. We were just talking
about that with Catherine. It's not a joke,
guys. All that aside, my point is we
don't know. You can't prove it, so let's
be adults about this and stop jumping into
the partisan sides. It says the Kirk connection
is ever more sinister. Going through his livestreams,
there's particularly disgusting string of events taking place.
Now they deleted all of it already, which
is, again, always so frustrating to
me. It's evidence.
It's not like you could watch it and
it says some horrible thing that there's not
personal identifiable information.
It's just things that lead to more conclusions.
Why would they delete that? Why would they
ever delete that? Because, you know, because it's
controlling the flow of information around something. That's
what I think. But I have the audio
of them. I'll show you. But it says,
hey. Whenever so basically, what you heard, they
were delivering pizzas to the person's house. That's
the girls that died.
And and he says, hey. Whenever Maria sees
the pizza guy come, better think of Charlie
Kirk for making fun of his effing death,
stupid a s s clown. Just remember that.
And it says she made a fun of
Charlie's death on TikTok, on a repost. Maybe
her mother should monitor social media activity. And
many things like this. So can you prove
that that's why? Who who can prove what
their personal intent was? It matters to know
that these were the thoughts he had before
this took place. Again,
a fraction of this, people like Stephen Miller
would call they're probably already calling this guy
a left wing terrorist or ignoring it entirely.
If this was anything, if he followed one
left wing politician, Miller would be calling it
left wing terrorism as we absolutely know for
a fact.
That's my point, guys, and that's insane.
They're all driving things like this in my
opinion.
Now it says he held a consistent contempt
for his female peers and justified harassing and
said peers repeatedly because of a response he
deemed unacceptable to Charlie's death. I don't think
you can deny this. There's a whole bunch
more in here. You wanna read through it?
Those are the points that stood out to
me.
This one was just simply,
oh, this is the one. This is the
audio
of,
and and it does oh, technically, it's not
just audio. It is he's so, basically, the
law he did streaming around baseball,
baseball reports as well as him playing this
game. You can see his face on the
top as he's
basically playing the game and says these things
on the Charlie Kirk. One second.
I gotta lay down. And there's cussing.
Earmuffs for the children out there that are
paying attention.
I gotta get drop pea pod tonight.
Hey. Whenever
Maria
sees the pizza guy come, better think of
Charlie Kirk for making fun of his fucking
death.
Stupid ass clown. Just remember that.
What are you doing to?
Now the restaurant's calling the number, not answering
it.
Uh-huh. That's where it's a walk. Yeah. I'm
not answering that thought.
Where is him that she
what about Charlie Kirk?
No. She made fun of Charlie Kirk's death
on TikTok on a repost.
Oh, she did. Maybe her mother should,
monitor her social media activities. That's gonna be
a double play.
Maybe there's a deal. I'm just gonna you
know what? I'm putting my phone on doing
that, mister.
Good luck trying to call my phone. My
Remember, guys, these this is the girl he
later killed. My burner phone.
My phone or phone.
Or or to be objective is what we're
the reports are showing. But based on what
we can see, based on the already engaged,
it it does appear to be the most
likely reality.
Like, you know but, again, it's not wrong
to question everything, especially since we've been lied
to damn near consistently from every third we
ever gotten from our you know, especially more
recently. But unless there's other reasons to look
in a different direction, that does right now
appear to be the most obvious case.
Not my normal phone, my burner phone.
Good luck.
So this this is
from,
looks like
just somebody's random post on this mirror site,
and that was what was put linked to
on the,
Reddit post, and all these videos had now
been removed by YouTube.
And this was the other one, if you
wanna listen to it, where he just it's
basically him just going, you know, giving,
condolences
after he killed them
and laughing about things like they played on
that. It it's it's it's a little bit
it's pretty weird.
Oh, and here's the video on way back
on the, archive, unfortunately. I've I've had luck
in the past being able to, like, download
in some way from the archive,
but usually doesn't work. But this is the
one. It's it's saved on there. You can
see the YouTube account right there.
And, again, the TikTok that's been censored or
rather just privatized, and now you and you
can skim through these if you want. You'll
find the there's not many
statements. It seems to be not much engagement,
but you can you can find retweets and
posts and stuff about both Tate and Kirk.
Now I didn't go too deep on the
older one, but maybe go through there and
you can find for yourself if there's anything
that makes anything more relevant.
Oh, wait. Again, here's a post he had
about helping Andrew Tate.
Now before we go into anything else,
it's just it's a it's a it's a
a very sad story. I mean, this this
kid is troubled, obviously.
And, you know, first and foremost, like, if
we were actually not if we weren't drowning
in partisan chaos,
like, deliberate partisan, like, dementia mania, it seems,
then we would be able to, every time,
be objective and be like, okay. This happened.
You know, first and foremost, maybe the guy
was just troubled. Maybe whether or not he's
a left or right, maybe he just has
trouble. Maybe it's you know, let's think of
it like this. And I got it's not
clear that it's
let's be specific. Less than half of the
country involves itself in left right politics. Really
remember that, guys. Every time it's what? 44
something percent. The the the majority of this
country
that does participate register excuse me, registers as
independent.
And then the largest block are people that
don't even participate. So don't forget how clearly
that shows you that it's they're not controlling
what they think. But
for the conversation of the politics,
they're they're claiming it's a fifty fifty shot,
guys, that somebody will be left or right.
So the idea that you can just take
every bad thing that happens and go, oh,
he's a lefty. That's why it all adds
up. It's just lazy, manipulative propaganda. It is
social engineering.
By of course, it could be something that's
relevant, but to just pretend we know that
is I mean, every one of them from
Matt Walsh. I mean, people across the board
with the largest influence are out there screaming,
lefty terrorist, lefty terrorist.
And, of course,
we've gone over I mean, long before this
has even been the topic. Go back ten
years. We're talking about very real things that
connect to that very point, but never claiming
it's because of their ideology or because the
problem is that people who are just simply
left and right, who have different political standings
are regular people.
And and and and you can see the
same kind of, you know, even as, what's
his name?
Now I'm gonna blank on his name.
Forget his name.
Prominent person during COVID nineteen time, you know,
suspect. I forgot his name. But came out
early in the in the last election and
said the same thing. He said, look, I
can see both sides,
like, flaming
their most radical parts,
very clearly leaning into and stoking and working
the most extreme parts of their base, but
then outwardly making it act like they're not
them. But it was and we all see
that. And so those are the two sides
that they're literally built. I I think we're
being we're watching some kind of engineered
division civil war level thing, and I'm not
claiming that's where it wound up. My point
is that you can see that. And you
know my opinion. I think Israel is playing
a large role in that, largely because they
literally say that, by the way, but I'm
crazy.
The reality though is regardless of why it
is happening. And so, when we come back
to an individual like this, the first thing
is maybe he's just have, you know, a
struggling kid,
too many medications, maybe he's got a mental
problem. And of course, if we can prove
some kind of intent, then then we can
take into that conversation. Now, saying something about
Charlie Kirk or if he ends up admitting
that was why, that really should matter.
And it should matter in any context, but
let's be objective and not fall into this
trap. But realize that these kind of things,
the both sides, left and right religious, your
government, are fanning these two things to watch
this thing bang against each other. Why? So
we don't pay attention to what they're doing
to all of us simultaneously.
That's what I think.
I mean, it's quite obvious what's happening. Every
single tool, we'll get into in a second,
that they roll out is being applied to
equally
Americans.
Anybody who is an issue for the power
structure. And they're rolling it out around us
in a rapid way that's in one of
the most unconstitutional
I mean, it is a
it's not light it's not,
harsh to say Over it's not over hyperbolic
rather to say a constitutional crisis. We are
living through an absolute
collapse of constitutional reality in this country, and
it's terrifying because of how much that seems
to be, like, the only last pendulum
thread keeping the illusion of some kind of
accountability on the government that I don't even
think is even there right now, but they
care because we do.
So think about that.
Here's another part to this I thought was
interesting. Different part, different story, nonetheless interesting.
It says these two were pretending to be
Antifa
and were trying to boldbait protesters by videotaping
them and sneaking around so they were called
out and guess who they were?
MAGA's finest, Joey Gibson, and Patriot Prayer Group
and his girlfriend. And you if you don't
know who they are, you can look it
up, and it shows their faces. I'll play
the clip. That's this guy, I guess. I
wasn't familiar with him until I saw this.
Joseph Owen Gibson, they claim the the Wikipedia
calls him right wing activist
and founder of a, what, Patriot Prayer, which
is active in Portland, Oregon and other cities.
Now
who knows what their intent is unless they,
you know, get into it in a longer
video?
The reality for me is that you could
argue they were there to try to prove
that they really are the lefty. However you
think the at the end of the day,
what you're seeing is them dressing up and
pretending to be Antifa
for whatever end. So is it is it
not the logical thing to ask whether or
not maybe some of these things were set
up by things like this?
In no way should that be to say
that Antifa hasn't done plenty of obvious violence,
guys. It's not even questionable. Or and on
top of that, that there's plenty of
just people existing in these conversations. They just
get labeled Antifa despite there ever being a
provable connection to some organized group. Regardless, I
think it's pretty obvious to see that there's
some kind of thing that happens like that
just like with Patriot Front. It's and many
others.
But just like we always point out. Or
how about this?
In in the same kind of thing in
reverse
that we've we've pointed out many times. On
January 6, you have example of people there
who were I mean, you could see I
mean, again, it became Antifa, but at the
time, there's no provable point. It's just a
guy in fact, I even I don't even
think it was the Antifa group. It was
some left wing group. But to make it
simple, we will call it Antifa. This guy
at the top, I forget his name now.
It's in the source material,
was dressed with a Trump hat, dressed like
the rest of them, but ended up being
proven to be a left wing activist who
was on video going, we did it. We
tricked them. We got them to go in
the capital. And that never even gets brought
up, not even by Republicans, it seems. Isn't
that crazy? Or, again, let's not forget the
Azov movement guy, Sergei Beninin, who was there
screaming, let's go, in Russian as they were
trying to make it seem like Russia was
involved. They really tried to lay that down.
This wasn't psychological
operation, guys. It's not even secret.
Bottom line, though, is that that's what we're
talking about. And so you need to ask,
and don't be blinded by your personal side,
whether or not these people were out there
to create violence to blame on Antifa.
Even if you think that's them doing what
they believe is right to get them because
Antifa is doing it ways they don't get
caught for. So we're gonna do a small
version so they have a reason to go
after them because we know they're terrorists. You
see, that's the kind of broken logic partisanship
creates. Here's the video.
Okay. Great. Thank you. You made it real
easy.
Hey.
You can see both their faces.
Now, who knows what the intent is?
Right? I mean, apparently, there was a whole
thing that I'm still you know, this was
it's hard. When these things are happening, it's
very difficult to get the truth from, like,
Andy Noe, for example.
People have very clear partisan perspectives on this
stuff. But whether or not this was something
that was planned or it was an organized
thing or there was more chaos they were
responsible for, the at the end of the
day,
this is important
because you have to consider this possibility. Don't
then always assume that's the case, like somebody
might want to to make their other side.
Just be objective. It's not that difficult. Consider
that this may be something you know, this
is why when events happen, when you get
all the politicians to rush out and go
left wing violence without even knowing what's happened
yet,
don't be a child. Don't follow along. You're
gonna get the Bennie Johnson's, Nicks orders, and
all of them are gonna scream whatever they
say. I mean, it's does anybody question that?
They're all it's obvious. You know, with the
inclusion of a red siren and a breaking
sign, even though it came out thirty minutes
ago, it will always happen. But the everybody
else who are out there and you see
this and you see something happen,
wait for evidence to make any kind of
allegation.
Look and see whether or not maybe it
is somebody pretending to be other side or
maybe they're not part of anything and they
just wore black because they don't wanna be
or maybe it's the FBI. You know? It's
just it's constant.
So let me include this for you real
quick. We're gonna end up going to some
Israel overlap.
Now last on this,
Elon
Musk, rather Eric Dougherty, one of the, you
know, same kind of you know, these are
the people that are just kind of, like,
mass sharing whatever the team is saying. He
says, we need first of all, Bukele,
the authoritarian leader in El Salvador, says if
you don't impeach the corrupt judges, you cannot
fix the country.
They will form a cartel, a judicial dictatorship,
and block all reforms protecting this the system
systemic corruption that put them in their seats,
says the open dictator
who literally illegally took power.
Eric says, we need du bouquile, our court
system. Watch how quickly this country is fixed.
Elon Musk says, essential.
I'm just blown away by how stupid these
people are or who I mean, I think
largely, they don't even care. It's a team
sport politics thing. It doesn't even matter. And
these I honestly think someone like Eric is
too I mean, I don't I shouldn't say.
I don't know him personally. I've never even
seen him speak publicly, which I think gives
me some kind of insight into somebody's intelligence.
Either way, the fact he's doing this kind
of work makes me think poorly of him.
But in general sense, my argument would be
these people, it's not even it's the like
a nix order. You I don't think these
people are smart enough to recognize what they're
actually a part of. I think they're quite
literally destroying this country, creating circumstances to allow
the most
authoritarian dictator dictatorial control over our country we've
ever seen.
But high five them because hashtag winning because
we think it's just insane.
But some of them do. That's even more
alarming. But this guy, Tommy, who I'm not
familiar with, says, Bukele forced out independent judges,
100%
proven,
packed the courts with loyalists, 100
every one of these things is verifiable to
a t. I've shown you this on my
show.
The argument is the same. Well, they were
the other t. They were the bad guys.
They were the deep state.
Who cares that see, this is the thing.
If they're deep state, then why would we
care why would we be legal to go
after them? Just remove them. Who cares about
the law? They're the deep state. Are they?
Can you prove that?
That should matter, shouldn't it? And it says,
then declared a state of emergency that allowed
him to arrest and infident indefinitely
detain people without any due process. He has
suspended civil liberties
and never brought her back.
That's what you want?
It says, when when we say these guys
are advocating for fascist ideas, it's because they
literally are. See, I agree with that. But,
see, if you think this only applies to
the right, then I think you're doing the
same blindness when it comes to the people
on the left. You You just have to
look at it from a different way. The
end it's the outcome, the end result.
Or, you know, maybe a communist a socialist
communist kinda bent versus a fascist bent, which
ultimately is the same general conversation. And you
see both things happening in this country right
now just like you saw both things happening
under Biden.
This is not some manipulative
fence sitting. This is the obvious verifiable reality.
It's clear. Of course, there is no such
fence when you realize it's just the government
doing it to you. My point, though, is
that we can obviously see
that this is fascistic, what they're pointing to.
And maybe maybe Eric or the rest don't
even know that. But the real the the
point or the reality of the bigger picture
is that all of this is happening on
both sides. And so calling one or the
other fascist is not inaccurate. And even if
it was, it's still not incitement to violence.
It's just I don't
sometimes I say things in the show and
I'm going like, I can't believe we're here,
where I even have to explain. It's like
it's like doing a demonstration on how to
tie your shoes. That's how it feels sometimes.
You go, why do I need to go
through this? But it's because we're being dumbed
down and increased. And in no way am
I saying I mean, look, I my genuine
my honest opinion, we have a very intelligent
community in this, and I think that's just
because we hold a higher standard for ourselves.
But my point is, in a general sense,
because of the dumbing down of this country,
that we fall into the partisan pettiness. Even
I do sometimes, guys. It's just how this
is it's it's being driven.
But think about that, guys. Think about where
we are and how both sides are do
like like battering ram against each other. How
does either side see that as a positive
outcome for themselves? They really think about that
from a, you know, Lindsey Graham to a
Nancy Pelosi. I mean, do they really look
at this going, that'll help us. That'll save
the country even if they are actually the
deep state. What do you think what you're
doing will it's gonna cause the the absolute
destruction of the constitution. It'll cause the the
collapse of this country in many ways.
They I mean, even if you don't think
that's the case, point out why you think
this is benefiting anybody.
Anyway, I just hope we're smarter to think
beyond this.
Now
some points about Israel I didn't want you
to miss, and let's get to the
technocratic side of the same conversation.
But first, Ben Gavir,
as Ryan Raspbiani pointing out, wants to hold
the global
sumud flotilla,
the crew in prison for months. Now whether
it happens or not, we'll have to see.
The fact that they're still there, it blows
my mind. Apparently, there's 12 Americans that are
there. Some of them are vets.
But Trump doesn't I mean, have they even
brought it up? Do they even care? No.
Not not Trump, not Marco Rubio, not not
Bondi,
not Hegseth,
not Cash, not Dan,
not any of them. All these America First
patriots, and they don't even care that 12
Americans are in a foreign prison
for not breaking the law.
In fact, for trying to bring food to
starving people that you claim you wanna feed.
I mean, they're they're lying to you guys.
You all see that by now.
And here's Ben Kabir, you know, the guy
who was making fun of them,
pointing out and going terrorist, terrorist to all
of them. He wants to hold them for
months.
I mean, it's it's just it's it's mind
blowing how obvious this is.
Michael Gallant points out, my dear friend, David
Adler,
was kidnapped and imprisoned by Israel for daring
to bring aid to Gaza.
The Flotilla prisoners report horrific abuse. The US
has failed its own citizens, which happens every
time this happens, literally every time this happens.
Going back yeah. I've showed you Joe Meador
how many times. In fact, I show it
so often, I bet you I can get
it to pop up right now.
Just look at that first one. I I
I typed j and it came up. The
point is clearly, this has been that you
go back left right administration, your government completely
ignores you if Israel takes you prisoner. How
How do you possibly not see what that
shows you? Joe Meaders is a veteran
from the USS Liberty,
and you listen to him. He'll tell you,
not on this video. He'll happily tell you
that he knows because it obviously happened and
you can prove it that the US government
allowed or rather covered up that Israel attacked
US ships.
But so he got arrested on a flotilla
and was held in prison in Israel for
months, and nobody cared. No one said a
word outside of people like us. Again, nobody
meaning people in power with the ability to
do something about it. So he,
David Adler, is now in prison.
David won't wouldn't want us to make this
about him. But as he acted for Gaza,
we must act to bring him home.
Think of the courage it takes, guys. They
knew this was gonna happen. You have to
understand that. They knew that this was gonna
happen. They and they got bombed. They got
skunk water and tear like, chemical weapons sprayed
on them. And that's what we're talking about.
It's like a chemical biological overlap. You look
into what this just quickly look up skunk
water in regard to Israel, it'll terrify you.
The people have died. People go into comas.
I mean, the stuff they do or the
gas they use, same thing.
It's not regular gas. Either way, people knew
this was gonna happen, and they put their
lives at risk anyway for people who are
starving to death.
As Al Quds reports,
Israel has committed flagrant violations of international law
against the detainees of the Freedom Flotilla, including
deprivation of necessary medical treatment, life saving medications,
as well as potable water and and food,
and held some trial sessions without legal representation
and without listening to the detainees' testimonies or
documenting the violations,
and imposed severe restrictions on their right to
access their lawyers. They were subjected to handcuffing
for long hours, and the jailers forced them
to sit or kneel on the ground and
under the sun, for some of them were
subjected to kicking, beating, and verbal insults. Now
we've heard quite a bit more, actually, but
I can't verify it from from reports of
forcing them to kiss the Israeli flag.
I mean,
is anybody even balking? I can't prove it,
but would that even surprise you? I mean,
also, let's remember, he called you, said, you're
all terrorists. Okay. What did Ben Gavir say
should be done with terrorists? So we're gonna
quibble about the fact that they would treat
them this way? I mean, it's verifiable
this is what they do,
and it's happened in the past with these
exact situations.
I'll include this,
the the the actual page for the website
for Freedom Flotilla Coalition.
Here are the reports as of October 1
about what happened, but it's up in the
air. As I understand it, Greta has been
taken home. Now you could let that mean
what you want with the mean. I don't
think that necessarily proves there's some kind of
weirder thing there, but some I'm sure people
will question that, and you should. But I
think what's obvious is that they've let the
higher l
the higher profile people go because these at
the core, Zionists are cowards. And you can
see that this is ultimately about abusing who
they can without any pushback because they know
they can get away with it, abusing a
bunch of people who are unarmed because they
know they won't get hurt, and they're doing
it to make a point. And all it
makes them look like is weak cowards. And
at the end of the day, they let
go of the people who are on the
higher profile because they knew that that would
give them more pushback because Greta can probably
wield a lot of resources.
That's what I'm that's I think that's absolutely
what's going on.
How in the world can these Americans or
anybody else again, I'm speaking from the American
perspective to my government, but anywhere else. Where
are their governments?
Why aren't they doing something about this?
Now speaking of Israel, let's make sure we
give you the update on what's happening with
this supposed ceasefire.
Now where we left off last time is
it was proposed, and Trump was screaming, everything
will come crashing down if you don't do
what you're told. Oh, that was on the
third. Hamas says it agrees to release Israeli
hostages but seeks changes.
So this is interesting to me. Also, sort
of showing that the the bluster,
the false bluster I guess that kinda means
false in its own right. Hamas has agreed
to release all the remaining Israeli hostages, but
says it wants further negotiations on a number
of key points outlined in The US peace
plan.
The announcement came after hours after Trump gave
Hamas a sun a Sunday deadline, that's today,
to accept the peace plan or face all
hell.
You know, the idea that you can literally
make a deal claiming that the
the the
that Hamas not existing is the reason is
the only thing we want out of this,
and then claiming that you have to accept
a deal that says you need to be
killed before we can end this.
That's essentially what's happening, but not working with
them, though. Working with the PA, working with
Israel and The United States, and then coming
to a conclusion and going, we've reached your
deal. Hamas, do what you're say yes or
no. That's what they're doing.
And
even then, they still engage in the process.
But first of all, he said, accept what
we just did or all hell. Right? After
Hamas submitted his response, Trump posted on True
Social, I believe they're ready for lasting peace.
Oh. Oh, so you're bluffing then. I get
it. He says he called on Israel to
immediately stop bombing in Gaza, which they immediately
didn't do and keep bombing right now right
up until the moment we started.
So all this shows you is that Trump
is willing to look ineffectual, to look completely
inept when it comes to Israel.
Like sitting there and slouching in a chair
holding the phone for Netanyahu.
In what other circumstance does Trump ever allow
that kind of reality? His hubris takes over
everything, his narcissism, but I guess not when
it comes to Israel.
So in this case, he says, you better
take this deal or all hell. And they
go, no. We have some changes.
And he goes, good. Peace. Okay. Well, then
that was the same old bluster he does
every time. You know how many times he
said that statement? I said that last time.
You better do this or everything. And then,
oh, nothing. And then nothing happens.
So, why does anybody take him seriously? And
I'm not even saying that means he wouldn't
act. We know they would. But I just
think it shows you that it's nonstop
bluster in politics.
Like it always is, but it's bad. It's
clumsy right now. I think it has been
for a while.
And next, it says, he called again on
the immediate stopping of bombing in Gaza, which
right I mean, from the moment he said
that until right now, they've not only stopped,
it seems they've increased.
Does he say anything? No. He'll probably just
pretend like they listened to him. Because what
admitting that they didn't even falter,
ignored what you said, shows you, one, that
you're not in control of the situation, that
you're not the one leading the conversation, and
that they don't care what you say. He'll
never
admit that publicly.
He says, we're already in discussion on details
to be worked out.
No. No. That's actually not true because right
now, it seems Israel's flying to Egypt to
to make discussions about this new you know,
I just I I can promise you my
opinion, but I know where this is gonna
go. It's the same way it's going every
other time. We have every single precedent before
this that makes it clear that Israel will
blow this up before they get what they
want.
However, it says that Trump and Israeli prime
minister Netanyahu announced the plan together on Monday.
Last Monday, Netanyahu reinstated his longstanding
opposition to a Palestinian state,
okay, saying in a video statement shortly after
the announcement. So Trump goes, we made a
deal. It's for a Palestinian state. It's for
the continue okay. And he goes on to
say, it's not written in the agreement. Netanyahu
says, we said we would strongly oppose a
Palestinian state.
Okay. Let me get this straight. So you
are making a deal for the future of
Gaza,
and it doesn't include the Palestinians.
That's correct.
Pretty simple. He's literally saying, this is we
will not allow Palestinian state. And they're also
saying, we need to get rid of all
the Palestine we need to move them all
out of here. And then Trump stands up
and goes, we have a future peace plan
for the Palestinians.
And we want and that deal, by the
way, is necessa is is hinging on Hamas
being destroyed. Now, Hamas, you must accept this.
I mean, this is a cartoon we're watching
right now, guys. And a anybody who's not
ridiculously involved can see it and is calling
it out. That's most of the world right
now.
Earlier on Friday, Trump posted on his true
social platform, if this last chance
agreement is not reached, all hell like no
one has ever seen before will break out
against Hamas.
You mean despite the carpet bombing destruction of
every single thing in there? Yeah. I guess
more than that he means. There will be
peace in The Middle East, one way or
the other. Isn't that insane?
You know what that reminds me of? The
show Peacemaker on HBO, where he says stagline
is,
what is it?
He's, I fight for peace no matter how
many men, women, and children have to kill
to get it. Something like that. That's that's
a joke. It's on HBO. Is that not
exactly what this is?
There'll be peace one way or another.
Okay. So murder your way to peace? Yeah.
That that's basically what they're doing. In a
briefing on the White House on Friday afternoon,
press secretary Carrie Caroline Liebitt said that the
consequences of turning down the deal would be
very grave. Okay. And then they go, no.
I've got changes. And they went, yay.
Okay. So then there were no consequences. You're
making that up and really aren't in control
of the situation. I need I need people
to recognize how obvious that is. In the
twenty four hour hours before midday on Friday,
sixty three people were killed.
So Trump says on what what day was
it again? Monday or Tuesday?
Oh, he posted on Friday. They they came
out then on the end of the week,
he said, you better accept it. All hell.
Okay.
And then or actually, even before that, actually.
The the the him saying,
he called Israel to so it said let
me try and get the date here. The
day.
On Sunday. Okay. So last week. Sunday last
week.
And then Trump said, I believe they're ready
for peace. Then he called on Israel to
stop bombing immediately, to work out the deal.
Okay.
They continue to bomb every single day since
then. Here's Friday,
Sunday today,
saying where was it? I just right there.
63 people on Friday. 63 were killed Israeli
military operations according to people on the ground.
This keeps happening every day. Today, so far,
55, as far as you can tell. Hundreds
of thousands of Gaza City residents have been
forced to flee after Israeli military ordered evacuations
to a designated humanitarian area, which doesn't exist.
But hundreds of thousands more are believed to
be remained.
So even BBC is putting it in quotes,
guys. They're it's everyone's calling this out. And
the truth is that's didn't Trump just tell
him to not do that? Yeah. He didn't
care.
Israel defense minister has warned that those who
stay during the offensive would be terrorists.
Hey. Too bad. Okay. What if they're in
a wheelchair and they can't get there in
time? Too bad. You're a terrorist. What happens
if they're in the bed and nobody can
move them? You're a terrorist now. That's just
how it works. See, the reality is they're
all terrorists in the minds of these Israeli
sociopaths.
And all they're doing is ping ponging them
back and forth between areas and bombing them
on the way. Every day we see those
reports, or come get some food. We'll snipe
you along the way and tell you it's
all freedom.
Israel has said the offensive aims to secure
the release of remaining hostages.
Again, call their bluff because they've turned that
down every single time.
October
2023,
they had two full offers to begin. They
turned it down and said, no. No. We're
going after Hamas. Hostages are secondary.
James Elder from the UN
said, quote, on Friday,
the idea of a safe zone was farcical.
That's his word. Bombs are dropped from the
sky with chilling predictability,
schools which have been designated as temporary shelters
even within the Israeli conversation. Right? These are
places that have been bombed, removed. There's no
tunnel. There ever really
was. And I'll say there aren't any. My
point is that they keep saying that. Then
they designate this as a UN safe zone,
tell Israel, which they never should really do,
this is not okay. Then they bomb that
place. And then when it gets covered in
the corporate media, they go, oh, terrorist, and
nobody cares.
Designated as temporary shelters, and they're regularly reduced
to rubble.
Okay. Sounds nothing nothing contradictory
there. Well, again, just the even the Guardian.
Trump orders Israel to immediately stop bombing, and
they didn't. K? Here is the fourth. That
was in the third. Trump says Israel agrees
to initial withdraw line. Hamas, confirm confirmation pending.
Okay. So now, first of all, it's the
the next day, Israel agrees to a withdraw
line. So you got wait. Wait. You already
made it you just told us two days
ago that Israel's agreed to the deal. Right?
Then you said Hamas needs to accept.
Now wait now but now Israel agrees to
a a different point. Like, it's just the
point is this is always flux. It's always
in flux.
And that's the way they play this. And
this is Israel's strikes kill
dozens
on Saturday
ahead of talks.
Right. So they're going to have conversations about
this,
and they bomb everybody
because that's what happens when you're trying to
engage with a peace agreement. Right? In no
world will that ever take this is Trump
going do it or else. That's not gonna
work. I think that's obvious, and I think
that's probably why they do it. They don't
want this to work.
Drop site news today. In the past twenty
four hours, Gaza Health Ministry reported an additional
sixty five killed. Hundred and fifty three injured
arriving at hospitals.
At least two aid seekers were killed and
thirty were injured. This brings the recorded death
toll from the Israeli genocide in Gaza to
sixty seven thousand one hundred thirty nine that
we can prove,
and over a 169,000
injuries.
This baby girl, you can see there, only
a few months old, was injured when Israel
bombed their home in Altuf in Altufa neighborhood,
East of Gaza City.
This is just a a site that I
saw in search that kind of is up
to date,
you know, giving you kind of the up
to date
actions taking place,
citing the different locations that, you know, reported
and so on. And really just wanna show
you that you can go back,
I mean, all day today, bombing all day,
go back to
the days before and recognize that they've never
even briefly stopped bombing. They've continued to pretend
to negotiate, and they bombed, and they bombed,
and they bombed the entire time. I mean,
this is all this is included if you
wanna scroll through and look at all the
different reports hour to hour,
When a person dies in Gaza due to
starvation every day,
constantly. Funny. And is that still the is
that still the famine that you all told
us was fake?
Gaza war not over yet. Marco Rubio says,
oh, good. Thanks for letting us know that
you're done not done murdering everybody in Gaza.
Brian Rosbiani points out Trump slams Netanyahu over
the Gaza ceasefire, and the theater begins anew.
If you think for one second that this
is actually some kind of division, guys, they've
been lockstep from the very beginning. They already
had, like, Jones tried to, oh, they split.
Like, I knew it was gonna happen, and
then they were tighter than ever after that.
The reality is they play us with these
kind of things every single time. Now could
I be wrong? Of course. I can always
be wrong. It's always possible. I don't think
that's the case here. I think we should
wait to see how it pans out, and
don't blindly take what they tell you. Watch
for the actions.
If he was splitting with Netanyahu, he wouldn't
still be supporting a genocide. That's probably the
most problematic thing in his entire situation.
It says, according to US officials, Trump fired
back. I don't know why you're always so
effing negative.
This is a win. Take it. Now do
I also think simultaneously
it's it's two different points. Whether Trump will
break
is not the same as saying whether Trump
likes Netanyahu.
I think it's very clear as even the
Charlie Kirk story revealed at through Grayzone and
others
that Trump is,
he feels I think he's, what's the word
they used? He's threatened.
Ultimately, he is worried about what Netanyahu will
do. And that same thing Kirk picked up
on, the same thing Kirk was saying.
So that's interesting. And, overall, that statement would
I think is accurate, that he's angry and
frustrated, but then outwardly, he's like, we're the
best in Israel or ally, just like the
left.
The clash shows Trump's growing impatience with Netanyahu
rights, resistance, and his determination to end the
war on his terms. Well, you could read
it that way if you want. I don't
agree. Most likely motivated by his desire to
win the Nobel Peace Prize. This is your
chance of victory.
So Hamas said it's ready to release all
hostages. Trump saw this as a major opening.
Netanyahu insisted it was a rejection. See?
Trump told BB this was his chance for
victory. Within three hours of their call, Trump
urged Israel to halt air strikes, negotiations, including
Kushner,
to meet this week. And guess what they
didn't do? They did not stop bombing in
Gaza.
So Trump very clearly wants to be done
with this because it's destroying everything.
Not to say that if he wasn't doing
this, he'd be fighting for you. I don't
believe that. Either way,
this is a problematic thing, just like Epstein.
It's all the same conversation. At the end
of the day, I think this is him
behind the scenes going, get it done. Take
this and let's be done with this. And
they he's that was never in the cards.
Probably because Netanyahu's feeding him a line of
BS like everybody else. Because Netanyahu loves to
brag about how easy it is to control
the two party paradigm in this country.
We'll have to wait and see. One last
point on the infiltration. I think this is
interesting to see. Israel exposed point this out.
Watch this congressman.
His name is Jake. How do you say
it? A a Anchin close.
Watch him realize I mean, you it's hard
that you can't prove what he's thinking, but
I get the sense of their point as
you look at his face. Look at his
face when they're voters.
Say to him that he's being influenced by
Israel because of his money from AIPAC.
Found this interesting.
Are you doing about the starving children in
God? And and the the point is to
think about is that this is what I'm
always trying to show you guys. This is
changing.
These are the average people, and
most of them probably don't have large influence
on Twitter or anywhere else. So you don't
hear them or you hear the p the
fake two party illusionist drown out everybody else
and pretend that they're the majority. They need
that because their entire shtick is built on
keeping you thinking that that mainstream alternative media
and the mainstream media, and they're fighting each
other left and right. When I think the
vast majority, like an iceberg, is aren't is
so far away from that now that it's
getting cartoonish.
So this these are average people standing up
and going you know, this guy takes tons
of money as it just showed from Israel,
and yet he's out there supporting or being
you know, he's in a place where most
of his voters seem to want that to
stop, and it doesn't. I think that speaks
for itself. Azad, what are you doing? Taking
what what are you doing? Taking money from
APAC,
with respect. That's something that is infiltrated our
our government.
APAC. APAC money. Watch congressman Jake Auchincloss
discover in real time that his voters know
he's bought and paid for by the Israeli
lobby.
I wondered whether if you
had not accepted APAC money, whether you'd change,
your feeling about speaking about Israel Palestine.
I think we we,
as citizens
and as policymakers,
have to hold in our heads
competing
convictions and ideas. Me personally, I'm concerned
with APEC, and I was just wondering if
you particularly or anyone you know of has
any plans to try to reduce this problem.
What are you doing to prevent the use
of our taxes to starve and kill people
in Gaza?
Yeah. You were elected by us. You were
right back.
I've I've addressed Israel and Gaza now on,
I think, three separate occasions. So we're gonna
keep moving on. So I know you
Listen to that.
Those are his constituents. That was the whole
room.
Look at him.
This is a person acting against the interest
of American people or his constituents
because of the people paying him. Welcome to
American politics.
I think I've always said to begin with.
Conflicting conviction? No. No. No. No. That's hypocrisy.
I understand that there can be conflicting ideas
that you need to flesh out to maybe
find your path. But the argument that just
in general, you've got con that's like saying
I've got conflicting principles. That means you don't
have them.
You are splitting between two different ideas that
seem contradictory because you're a hypocrite being paid
to be so. That's my opinion. You could
decide for yourself.
Don't really wanna take any more questions about
gossip, but I'm gonna ask you to think
about it. Starvation is not
is not what my tax dollars should go
to.
So I hear the the the sense of
emotional urgency behind Gaza. I've addressed that issue.
I'm not gonna continue to address the issue.
I wanna know aside from taking money from
APAC,
with respect, that's something that is infiltrated
our our government.
What are you going to do? What do
you plan to do
to end the killing of Palestinians
in I mean, guys, these are average people.
I mean, like, I really wanna stress again
to think about the under the the iceberg
analogy and recognize that this country has this
this toothpaste out of the bottle.
Do you this is there there's no pulling
this back. People are aware that Israeli government
is influencing policy in this country to the
degree that it may very well be in
charge.
You can decide that last part, but to
debate whether or not Israel
is influencing policy is insane to me.
They if they were at a point where
they're going, yeah, basically, yes, but it's because
they're allies and we're on the same thing.
Like, they're getting to the point to where
they're borderline admitting that's the reality.
That's why everyone has an issue with this.
Your politicians don't seem to represent you anymore.
Now there seem to be a few
that are striking the right path. Support them.
Whether or not they genuinely mean it, hold
them accountable no matter what, continue to question
no matter what, especially since they may just
be saying that to get your attention, but
support it anyway.
Give these politicians
the incentive
to go in the right direction. Show them
they're opportunist politicians that they are. Maybe in
a world, eventually, we don't need them. But
show them now, since it exists, that it
will benefit them more than anything else to
tell the
truth because that's what we want.
Gaza
while they are trying to access food.
I've addressed the Gaza
issue on numerous
times. So you don't don't plan to do
anything to end the killing So Palestinians? Like,
do you believe killing children and civilians in
the name of strategic defense is ever justified?
Yes or no?
A somewhat related question.
I wanna make clear, I'm a lifetime Democrat,
and I will
probably continue to be.
But I also feel that all three
branches are governed, are betraying
the people of The United States right now.
Look at that. So you see now suddenly
why people like Stephen Miller are so hell
bent on making it a division reality just
like they wanted to split down the division
of your media consumption, TikTok, and everything else?
Because people were seeing it, and they still
are, left or right. See, you have more
in common than you want to see if
you're lost in the partisan game. The the
a lifelong Democrat, I see that problem. Lifelong
Republican, I see that problem. And I think
that's the majority of people in, you know,
not the influencer types.
How do you not recognize what that shows
you?
Even if you,
inherently disagree with basic, you know, like, wedge
issues and things that that matter to you,
recognize the core urgency of that point, and
recognize that we're on the same side of
that point. And the only ones not on
that side are the ones that are being
paid not to and who are on the
other side.
That's my opinion.
Now here's what Glenn Greenwald said, and we
showed this before. There were two venues in
The US where Israel critics
Israel criticisms
thrived, US campuses and TikTok.
The campus problem was solved by Trump's new
hate speech codes. Remember I showed you Kirk
cheering that on?
Firing professors, DEI for Jewish students. Right? The
same thing they're fine. ODEI, except this one.
Same thing. I keep making that point. The
isolated version after the broader case. The TikTok
problem was solved by giving it to the
IDF financier,
Larry Ellison.
Janice Gurel says they're solving the rest by
buying influencers and saturation discourse. She's right. We
already talked about this. FAR registration shows that
Israel paid $900,000
for US influencers between July and December 2025.
I mean, you could look through them. There's
and there and the reality is there's a
hell of a lot more than on that's
on this list. This is the these are
the ones that got shown.
You know the ones we're talking about. All
the same ones that we're seeing out there
that pull these punches everywhere they can for
this conversation.
Responsible Statecraft. Israel's paying influencers
$7,000
per post.
You don't think people take that bait? I
mean, people who don't even care about politics
are gonna jump on this to make money
and then and then be propagandizing
one side of the argument.
Here's Matt Wallace, who we've called out forever
as probably one of the most cartoonishly stupid
people in this platform. He has me blocked.
That's why this is on here. Benjamin Netanyahu,
he writes eleven hours ago, is the best
leader in history, and every single human on
Earth loves him.
Yeah. Perfect that Matt Wall Matt Wallis, excuse
me. I I guess I said, Walsh. It's
Matt Wallis I'm talking about.
Of course, he comes out and says because
this guy's a cartoon. He's the one I
mean, that's nothing worth getting into. If you
wanna think of the most child like, the
most hyper like like, imagine Babylon b making
a making fun of what some of the
worst reporters are doing. That's exactly what he
does. It's it's just it's insane. It's just
the most catch clickbait,
pay the link, and then all you know,
just rattling off things that people said with
no evidence. It's crazy, and it's usually tied
back to things that are not even true.
Overall,
for him to do this is just, like,
perfect. Exactly. They're the low hanging fruit, the
people that will say anything for any reason,
like a Laura Loomer and do not care.
No. I even take that back because I
think Laura has her vicious,
you know, ideology that drives hatred and then
she does seem to go you know, that's
but either way,
she got paid a $100 to eat
Purina dog food. And, yes, that's a real
story. I mean, we've we've talked about it.
The guy literally tracked and proved the whole
thing. And the crazy thing is, like, you
really believe she'd take a $100? Well, I
thought that was crazy, but it shows you
the lack of scruples. A $100? Yeah. Do
it. Whatever. I'll buy the
and tricked her into eating Korean and dog
food on air. The point is that people
will do anything for money, even a small
amount. She's probably got lots of money. This
is just showing you the kind of people
out there that are willing to just go
I mean, in the face of everything we're
watching.
And as Shrutov says, seven seven k member,
don't spend it all in one place.
Now here is a funny clip I just
wanted to share. I think it's it's humorous.
I'll only play the beginning of it. But
James Lee says, okay. In case you didn't
see this, Barry Weiss, you know, Assad, toady,
little breakdown of her career, seem to start
right there.
The point was she said that on Joe
Rogan and didn't even know the definition of
the word toady. She was just so used
to being in a room full of people
that go, correct. Barry, you said the right
thing. We all agree with you. No. Well,
if you're in a place where people actually
have different opinions, then you had better know
what you're talking about. And she does not.
And she was just tapped to be the
head of what is it? The the new
head of CBS News. Apparently, doesn't even know
what the Mossad is.
He says also a true master class by
Tim Dillon,
brilliantly exposing just how much of a fraud
she really is.
Owen, welcome to Honestly. Thank you very much
for having me. Well, a lot of people
on the Internet believe that you are my
boss because they believe that I am a
member of the Mossad. Oh, really? This is
actually the first time that I'm meeting you
or, at least as far as I know,
any member of the Mossad, so I'm very
excited to meet you. I'm the first one
that you've ever met, but you know There
might be I might have met people. Others
that are in another world. First, I wanna
set the table for people because the Mossad
is an agency
that is just shrouded in so much conspiracy
and propaganda.
Simple question, Yossi. What is the Mossad?
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Tim Dillon
Show.
Friend of the show, Bari
Weiss, did a
fascinating
interview
with a member of the Mossad,
and she really looked into
the process.
And it was incredibly
interesting.
So what I wanna do now is I
wanted to bring someone in to explore an
area where I am completely clueless.
I mean, completely in the dark, and I
wanted somebody to kinda walk me through,
an area of study
that I know nothing about, just like Barry
did.
So I wanna thank you for coming, Chloe.
You work at Dairy Queen.
That is true. Yes.
What is
Dairy
Queen
in your mind? What is it? Because people
say that they serve ice cream there, and
I'm not even I'm not even super sure
what that is.
What's ice cream?
Yeah. What is ice cream?
Like, what is it?
Oh,
it's like, the frozen
dessert
ice cream. A like a little treat.
You obviously get where he's going with that.
Right? Hopefully so. Right? The the the point
is simply that she you know? I mean,
I I'm pretty you could obviously point out
that she wasn't like, I don't know what
Masada is, but the way that she's doing
it is just clumsy. That was he was
doing a hyperbolic version of that. You know?
And just the way and and, of course,
her show is called Honestly.
I mean, come on.
It's just everything her demeanor is very childish
and, like, not like, I don't know. Just
everything about that person is somebody who's been
propped into this. It's just does not deserve
it. And, overall,
the Larry Ellison overlap is just like, you
know, you your career got saved by this
Israel controlling
media conversation.
Overall, though, it is people that have been
toeing the line their entire career and are
being propped up in more, you know, failing
corporate media. But I guarantee you're gonna see
that kind of fold in and overlap like
air Ellison's already doing with all these new
independent media people and funding the same way.
It's where this goes.
Now speaking of two party illusion and partisan
stupidity, here's Alex Jones. Top Epstein investigator confirms
Trump is totally innocent of sex crimes with
children and how the president's DOJ is using
the Epstein files to blackmail the deep state.
Wow.
That is the I mean, Mike. Okay. You
can look at the GoKeefe media, and you
can watch it for yourself. So a guy's
saying these things.
So it's just as likely, by the way,
that this guy says that because he watched
Alice Jones report that two weeks ago or
more than that. When this came out and
the first thing you saw was that they
were not releasing more, Jones came out with
the stupidest argument that Trump was using the
Epstein files to blackmail the deep state, and
that's why you can't see it. Then it
came out two days later that it was
the exact opposite. I'm not even making that
up. The point is that he's just throwing
nonsense against the wall. The reality that this
even makes sense,
is painful.
The idea that you would so you're gonna
you want us to believe that you went
so you're blackmailing them? You mean for money?
Okay. So not putting them in jail. Okay.
So
how does that work out to saving us
from this? You're working with them or you're
blackmailing it for some outcome?
I mean, my god. And Larkin Rose just
nailed it. He says, the question is, is
Alex really stupid enough to believe this? Or
does his this that does he just think
his listeners
are stupid enough to buy it?
Helping Trump cover up heinous crimes against children.
This is what controlled opposition actually looks like.
Despicable.
Perfectly said. I mean
and first of all, Epstein investigator confirms he's
so now you're telling us that they do
have evidence back there that proved one or
the other, and they're not showing it to
you?
Why would Trump not prove that to you?
This is just so painful. This is like
elementary
stuff. But here he is screaming it out
loud and, of course,
only getting a little views for him. I
think that says something. Even his old audience
is going, come on, Alex.
Stupid. And, of course, Patrick Beck David just
has to be the one to talk about
it with him because that not that he's
responsible for what Alex Jones dumps on the
show or, excuse me, what the reports dump
on. The point is the same. Overall,
it's just ridiculous to make the argument, insert
anything's possible. But the idea that he's innocent,
I don't think anyone's proven that he's guilty.
So why would the argument to come out
and be proven? Why would you prove something
that hasn't been proven yet?
See what I say is that that that's
kinda like the lady doth protest too much
kind of a point. But either way, I
think the sad thing is
blackmailing the deep state. Like, really think about
that for a second and explain to me
why that makes him the good guy.
Arrest them. If you have evidence that shows
they're sex human trafficking child bolsters,
yeah, the good thing is to coerce them
into some other thing and benefit from it
because that's what freedom looks
like. Wow.
Well, here's another example of this kind of
ridiculous game that's being played. Here's Wall Street
apes going treason in all capitals. Director of
the and by the way, this is not
this this is what? The fourth time we've
seen this thing floated?
Cash Patel, drowning in his own lies, has
to throw throw the partisan game at the
wall to make sure people will jump at
it, and I don't think it's working.
Director of the FBI, Cash Patel, Nancy Pelosi
involved with setting up January 6. Yeah. I
can I've proven these things on the show.
The reality of the allowance, the reality of
the phone calls, also with things on the
other side, though, the reality of what this
all was. And I'm not even talking about
like, this was a setup for Republicans.
If you understand the government as a thing
that it is, then you have to understand
that that's both sides of it. But my
point is that this was a trap. There's
always an operation.
But Pelosi being involved is not a secret.
She made sure that there was no National
Guard. We talked about that. Pelosi and her
team were busy filming busy filming. 250
FBI agents.
Okay.
January 6 committee was then to create to
cover it up. This is all what Castro
is saying. Pelosi is a criminal. She committed
treason.
Great. I said, I agree.
And now watch as absolutely nothing of substance
happens.
I hope I'm wrong. Every time I hope
that. How about Jones and the big, big,
big thing coming with all the indictments? Where's
that at, Jones? Where's Comey? I thought Comey
was gonna be in prison right now.
Maybe he will be. But every single thing
around it that you actually care to look
at seems to suggest that's not even close
to what's gonna happen.
Do you think Pelosi's gonna be arrested? And
if she does, do you think she'll be
held accountable? Well, history screams the opposite.
I hope 100%
that happens.
I don't believe it will. So the question
becomes, how many times will you cheer for
the statement of things that should happen without
them happening?
And then ask yourself how many people like
this continue to do that even though it
doesn't happen, and ask yourself what their motivation
is. I'm not saying I know. I've seen
Wall Street apes share lots of good things
too. I'm simply pointing out in a large
sense that you need to start asking these
questions.
Doctor Alex Zak points out,
where's Fauci's arrest? Right? Oh, yeah. Trump gave
him a medal instead.
Where's the accountability for Pfizer? Oh, yeah. That's
right. He made two deals now with them
instead.
Where's the Epstein files? Oh, yeah. It's suddenly
a democratic hoax.
He says, but there's no but but here's
the reality in his opinion.
Those things were never going to happen anyway.
They dangle the carrot so you'd outsource your
power and give attention to charging this changing
the system,
hoping this time it would be different.
They'll fell for it again. Right? And hoping
somehow the agents of the system would hold
the system accountable for doing exactly what the
system is designed to do. Perfect.
Instead of spending time and energy dissolving the
illusion of authority,
Exactly.
And exiting the system as best you can
altogether.
I find this so fascinating to me, by
the way. I really respect Alec. We have
different opinions on certain things. I mean, maybe
lesser now than I realized, but
very much respect him for for many reasons.
But one was that, you know, during the
whole overlap of COVID, you know, he was
really, really adamant and probably rightly so. I'm
still genuinely genuinely still feel that there's more
to be discovered around the conversation, but of
the idea of of, you know, germ or
no germ theory kind of idea. Germ you
know, train germ theory.
And it very much is of the odd
mind that that's germ theory is fake. Right?
That's the hit or at least, again, I
don't wanna speak from case more has changed
since that was the point then. And him
and Derek got into it pretty aggressively, and
then they bided him on. They had a
conversation about it. And I thought it was
really well done, very amicable.
And since then, both of us have over
I mean, more so Derek, but I've talked
to him and overlapped. And the point is
that, you know, he understands that our position
is not dishonest. We may disagree on certain
things, but at the end of the day,
it's coming from a place of genuinely wanting
to prove and find the the reality of
these things. And I can prove to you
that we're being lied to and manipulated about
tons of stuff like that.
Overall, I just wanna point out that this
person has been acting with integrity and principle
the entire time I've seen him work.
That's just worthy of note, guys, all the
time. And, overall, what he's saying here is
is it is superseding two party illusion stuff.
It's about the idea of authority. I mean,
that's that's anarchism, guys. That's that's algorithm. That's
where I think we need to start leaning
towards is recognizing that we don't need people
to tell us how to live our lives.
And the people that pretend they're gonna save
you or
create the world you think you want are
the ones that are lying to you every
single day and being gaslit by the screamers
online who pretend they're on your side.
Dan Bongino, another example, comes out after Kash
Patel says Maduro
isn't just corrupt.
He's an indicted narcoterrorist
dictator with a $50,000,000
DOJ bounty. Oh, because it makes sense that
the US government would put an indictment out
for a foreign leader that they can't arrest
and there's no yeah. That's the flimsy nature
of indictments, isn't it, guys? They're just accusations.
But he loves to say it so you
think he's guilty
without knowing what you're actually talking about. And
maybe he doesn't even know. That wouldn't surprise
me. But it says, under my leadership,
end quote, the FBI is choking off every
dollar, every account, every enabler. So they're right
back to the starving of Venezuela, like they've
been doing for generations or rather decades and
administration is what I meant to say.
So the point is Maduro is a narcoterrorist,
and the bounty you have on his head,
you know, but you like the like the
$100,000,000 bounty they had on Jelani's head before
they made him the leader of Syria.
But Dan Bongino says, we're teaming, tearing apart
the international drug trade, infecting our communities piece
by piece, tendril by tendril. Does anybody actually
think that four boats, one of which is
turning around, none of which they've proven even
remotely involved in the drug trade?
It could be anything. They've lied about everything.
We've entire I mean, our government lies about
everything. But But let's just even say the
four boat they've attacked were drug traders. That
is that the international drug trade? A couple
of skiffs?
I mean, these people are ridiculous. They will
take I think they're drowning in the fact
that nobody believes them right now. So they're
trying to be desperately, desperately, desperately seeking your
affection online.
Jason Basler says, well, did you arrest the
clowns at the DEA then?
Jason Basler, someone you should be following as
well. One of the most principled people online.
And I think this is an important story
that I hadn't seen, so let's talk about
that. So here they are going, you're corrupt
drug trafficking, Maduro, despite zero evidence to back
that up. And I wouldn't dispute that maybe
they are. Our government's involved in it too.
It wouldn't surprise me.
So here they are going, we're gonna break
down the international drug trade. Okay. Well, how
many times I told you?
The vast majority of cocaine trafficking comes through
Colombia and through another US ally.
Venezuela?
It's it's peanuts compared to the larger conversation,
but there is some traffic you can prove.
08/19/2025,
this comes out.
Wiretap. The DEA laundered $19,000,000
of cartel drug money into cash and crypto.
Funny how no one's talking about that.
It says over a decade for over a
decade, the DEA ran a money laundering operation
for a Colombian
narcotics trafficking cartel. Well, surprise, surprise.
In total, the agency has its sources and
it it and its sources took $19,000,000
in drug money funneling like I just told
you guys, they take, they seize, they don't
blow up a boat. Right? And it says,
funneling cash into bank and cryptocurrency accounts controlled
by sources, agents, and the cartel,
working with the cartels that Trump wants you
to believe they're fighting.
And it says at the end of it
all, two heroin traffickers were charged as a
direct result of the operation. Two.
The scapegoats.
Not the people in charge, not the cartel
they're dealing with, but the two scapegoats they
used. That's according to both a source familiar
with the investigation and a recently unsealed seizure
warrant, which shows how the DEA was deeply
embedded in the cartel's attempts to evade law
enforcement,
both in shifting old school fiat currencies and
digital alternatives. The DOJ declined to comment. So
when they all go, cryptocurrency is being used
for yeah. It's them. They're the ones doing
it. On top of that, don't miss the
part where they help them evade law enforcement.
I guarantee you, if they're able, they'll make
the argument that they were just trying to,
you know, infiltrate to break a you know,
go after the larger culprits. No. No. No.
They were helping them get away.
This is the reality. Not for every single
part of every single part, you know, every
institution,
but you guys have to look back and
recognize this is the consistent part.
And based on an idea that drugs
that you can't make decisions about your own
life and what you put in your own
body, It's not even about that. They don't
care about that. They're poisoning you a thousand
different ways.
This is corruption.
The same kind of corruption that you can
see
while you watch these two clowns point at
something that's not there. Alright. Rather, at the
very least, the the the they they they
don't I mean, the point is they don't
care about drug trafficking, or at least the
people telling what to do don't. And they
are ultimately making the point about Venezuela because
of things that have nothing to do with
drug trafficking.
I think it's very obvious. If they cared,
they'd be talking about Colombia, but Colombia is
a US ally and they don't want that
to happen. Now there's shifting allegiances, you understand?
But for a long time, that's been the
reality. And the reality is that that's if
they break that open, even if they suddenly
no longer support him,
the proof will be long in in the
reality of how long they've been allowing that
to happen.
I just think this is insane.
Not only do they take the money, they
work with the cartels. I mean, Trump right
now is telling you, even as in his
recent executive order, that they're at war with
the cartels.
Didn't he just say that? He didn't even
specifically say trendy to Uruguay. He just said
cartels.
And you could prove they're literally taking money
and working with them and letting them go.
Guys, this is the reality of our government.
Mediaite says, just a last point on, you
know, what their what they in regard to
enforcement,
sources leaked that Trump FBI
fired an agent because he did not he
refused to perp walk James Comey.
So the people out there that would go,
yes. That guy, they're the smallest person in
the room. They're the children that just want
to dunk on the guy. The reality is
what you should care about that person going
to prison,
which it doesn't seem like it's gonna happen
because of stupid things like this, because it
seems petty and small. All they wanted was
to make Comey look. What they actually well,
I mean, cut to the chase. I think
it's about displaying
the action so you all believe it's happening.
That's what I think. The perk block's all
you're gonna get. And I didn't and and
the point was the guy didn't wanna do
it because it's not necessary, and he fired
him because of it. What if he's the
best agent on the force? Who cares? He
didn't do what I wanted.
Even if it was sort of a violation.
Like, the idea, it's unnecessary
and unlike either way, we're I think this
guy's a criminal, deserves to be in jail.
So does the person putting him in jail.
But overall, this just shows you the petty
nature of what they're doing, and they're not
fighting for you.
Now in regard to the two last parts
on this
well, the oh, this one oh, this was
the overlap of the censorship part and and
digital IDs, and we're gonna finish with the
part about the
ICE overlap.
First, I just wanna show you this continue
from the last section we just had on
Twitter and censorship, and
this is Elon Musk.
Or, I mean, in regard to enforcement and
then getting into the censorship.
Wall Street Apes says Heritage Foundation exposes Hillary
Clinton was directly behind getting EU to use
their Digital Services Act to pressure Musk and
America back into censorship.
Oh, okay. So Clinton made me do it.
Elon Musk.
Exclamation mark.
Okay. So you you mean you weren't censoring
for Israel and the ADL or because your
childish flip outs about h one visas or
or,
Venezuela
or because Crock said the wrong thing? No.
That's all that is Clinton flew back and
made you do that? No. That's not what
happened. But, see, this is an easy point.
Hillary is the reason. Bad Clinton. We can
all ignore that I'm complete hypocrite. And, you
know, speaking of Elon Musk, the the funny
part here is that this is the kind
of thing you get. Okay. But let's just
okay. Let's just say it's the case. Hillary
Clinton's a monster and she'll go to jail.
Are you gonna put her in jail for
that?
Now I'm not saying Elon Musk. The point
is what you just described is a crime.
Right? Put her in jail.
How much do you wanna bet that doesn't
happen? What they want from you is to
go bad democrat, and then fall into whatever
trap they create.
Elon Musk, now that he's out that kind
of drifted back out of the scene, like,
in the front and center,
is just, you know, he's just social engineering
the entire conversation with these ridiculous things he's
doing.
Now, by the way, Clinton did it. Oh,
is that still what's happening, Musk? Seeing as
how on October 4, uncensored AI was suspended
from your platform because it competes what you're
doing? No. That wasn't Hillary Clinton, guys. That
was not Hillary Clinton. That was Elon Musk
and Israel.
Twitter x was owned by the deep state
before Musk and is sold to him as
a part of the psyop that got deep
state Trump into power, says David Icke,
promoted deep state Musk as a free speech
absolutist and convinced hundreds and millions that we
are winning when they were simply being lassoed
by the by that which they claimed to
be opposing. Good way to say that. A
few of us said this from the start
and took enormous abuse for doing so. Good
job. We don't care.
I agree.
Simon Godek.
First, Grop two point o, then TikTok, and
now this.
By now, everyone should realize who is the
driving force behind the censorship.
There's a lot of overlap with Israel. He's
making both points. I think the reality is
clearly this is about not free speech, but
about controlling the flow of information, in this
case, technology.
As Jason Baster points out, big brother just
got an upgrade.
Starting December, Amazon's Ring cameras will scan and
recognize faces.
Weird how that's the exact same time as
Ice is doing the same thing. Totally no
connection. Right? Don't want to be in their
database? Too bad. Walk past a ring and
your face can be stored, tagged, and analyzed
without consent.
One step closer to total surveillance, and this
is where it gets even crazier because what
they're actually doing is some next generation kind
of stuff. It's we'll get to it in
one second. It's right here.
Oh, wait.
Oops. Make sure I didn't go past it.
There was one other post that I didn't
maybe I got let me see. Make sure
I didn't get rid of
it. No. I don't think so.
Oh, you know what? I think it's over
here. Okay. That's what it is. I moved
it. So I just wanna show you this.
We'll get to this in a second.
But scanning two hundred and sixty five eye
points, that's what ICE is now using. So
I'm of the mind that's what we're talking
about when it comes to this kind of
stuff. This is rolling out all at the
same time, and I believe it's all interconnected
with Israeli
tech. First of all, The UK, as we
already showed you. New digital ID scheme we
rolled out across The UK.
Now just because we're not the the US
government is not screaming it in your face,
it's happening right now, guys. In slow, incremental,
boiling frog type ways. It's happening.
The digital ID, digital social credit, digital money,
it's all and they just know that Americans
are very on guard about it. The UK
seemed I mean, they're on guard about it
too, but they don't seem to care. Digital
IDs, right out on the surface. In the
EU,
they're now mandating
that if you as an American
Oh, I guess apparently, it says that American
Well, I guess, well, I'll let you I'll
let him say it, but I think the
framing was anybody, but he seems to make
it about Americans in particular. Going to 30
countries right now, they will demand that you
have to give your biometric data or you
won't be able to enter.
Is this not exactly what we were all
warning about?
I guess we were all black pill to
purity tests.
That'll age well.
A trip to Europe, you're gonna have to
hand over way more than your passport when
you get there. The as part of a
new entry exit system, visitors to most European
countries will have to provide
four fingerprints
and a facial photo
at a self operated kiosk. The information will
be stored for three years with the photo
being used for ID verification
on later visits.
I promise you it won't be three years.
I promise you it'll be indefinite.
My opinion.
And it's based on literally every precedent before
this where they get caught doing that after
lying to you in the first place, like
right there.
Refuse to provide their biometric data
will be denied entry.
The goal of the program is to enhance
security and speed up border crossings, it is
said. The new system is set to be
rolled out.
Even he didn't seem to buy that, by
the way. But guess what? Immigration.
That seems to be the argument of the
day. During COVID, they all said COVID. Right?
During terrorism, they all said terrorism. Now they
say immigration, except watch it fold right back
into some kind of terrorism, which seems to
be where it's going. The point is the
solution
is always the same for whatever problem they
wanna point to because it wasn't really about
the problem.
Over six security and speed up border crossings,
it is said. The new system is set
to be rolled out over six months starting
in October and applies to 29 countries, including
popular destinations like France, Italy, and Spain.
I just
can't believe there's not more I mean, let
me put it this way because I I
I it's I as I think that most
people are calling this out, I can't believe
there's not more large influencer people, like, manipulatively.
They don't see the benefit in using the
I mean, I jumping ahead. They don't see
the benefit in kind of suddenly coming out
and being, like, you know, like, recognizing that
there's an opportunity and being honest about this.
Every clearly, everybody wants that. And so what
I what I think to to make the
second point
is if you wanna talk about, like, the,
you know, threaten the Charlie Kirk being threatened
and that's why, you know, wearing his vest
when he goes out to do the campus
report, I don't think they're in danger. I
think the people who are in danger are
the ones who are suddenly doing that. The
ones who have been paid by $7,000
a post and then start going, but maybe
Israel's committed genocide. Then I think they're you
know, if you're gonna be real about it,
I think that's what the overlap was. But
overall,
yeah, you know, the idea that I mean,
clearly, there's a lot of contentious things. There's
a lot of very powerful people with a
lot of interest here. It's not hard to
understand why these things might happen.
Jason Basler says 17 countries have rolled out
or passed digital IDs laws in the last
three months.
17.
EU, UK, Laos, China, Taiwan, Mexico, Zambia, Canada,
Ethiopia, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, Costa Rica, Switzerland, Papua,
and New Guinea.
Just totally a coincidence, I'm sure.
It's just all it's right in front of
us.
Now I'll play this again. I think it's
important.
If you have an Amazon Echo we just
talked about
or another form of smart device in your
home, you need to watch this. Beyond the
current dystopian surveillance, very important to understand geofencing,
coming to a freedom city near you.
This is Aman Javi speaking in what's called
the agenda, their vision of the future. Then
we're gonna finish with how all this is
being used in real time,
right now under the guise of immigration,
and how Israel's companies are the ones facilitating
it. So keep that in mind in this
kind of world they're building, that the the
tech that they're employing is being used to
create this kind of a world and that
you have a genocidal government being in like,
whether controlling it or at the very least
having access to all of it, which is
provable.
One man who knows the dangers only too
well is Aman Jabi, who was at the
forefront of digital development in Silicon Valley, California
for twenty five years.
He left when he recognized the dark side
of surveillance technology,
choosing instead the peace and beauty of Montana.
He's an expert in facial recognition.
It's a technique that is used
to uniquely
identify the biometrics
of any face. So in a device like
your smartphone and most modern smartphones in the
last five or seven years, they have a
three d camera module in the front of
the phone, which you cannot see.
Within that module is a near infrared
projector which projects tens of thousands of dots
on your face.
Those dots
are then distorted based on the contours and
the features of your face.
And there's a near infrared camera then takes
a picture of that distortion,
captures it, and then reverse engineers
the exact profile of your face.
In the longer term,
facial recognition will be This was my point
about if they can recreate that biometric in
some kind of digital, even three d model,
then they realistically have access to everything you
have with, you know, face print and anything
else. That's important to think about. And I
think that's a smaller end of the the
issue, but it's just on top of everything
else, they already probably have access to. If
you just happen to have some secret device
with the face you know, if you have
biometric access, they do too.
Be used
to
unlock your digital identity,
which is going to be a tool of
control
for the agendas that are coming down the
pipeline.
Elements of that control are already with us.
Alexa,
good morning.
Good morning.
You are never alone in your home, and
this is why.
All your devices at home and all smart
appliances,
they are all connected on a wireless network.
Many of these devices will have cameras, many
will have microphones,
And so they are monitoring everything all the
time. Your smart appliances are communicating with the
smart meter
and sending it real time usage data.
If there's a ring camera also in your
home, a mesh network is formed, and all
your devices are being tracked within the home,
its location, its usage, and all the data
is going to Amazon servers.
When you leave your home, all modern vehicles
are connected to the Internet, so your automobile
is being tracked
all the time. When you're going under
a string of smart LED poles and smart
LED lights on the highway and in the
streets of your towns and cities,
those form a wireless wireless
network and are tracking your vehicle. They are
tracking all the devices on you from smartphones
to smartwatches when you're walking
on the streets. So
data is being collected twenty four seven continuously
on every human being
whenever you are within these wireless networks.
And it's obviously not
good for health also because of all the
electromagnetic radiation.
In the long term, the plan is to
pretty much lock up humanity in smart cities,
which is kind of a superset of a
fifteen minute city.
They've sold all the state and local governments
and countries
that smart cities are about sustainability and the
good of the city.
But in reality, the language from the UN
and WEF and their white papers is all
inverted.
So
their monitoring is really about limiting mobility and
no car ownership,
right? Surveillance
controlled via LED grid is why the smart
lighting is there.
Water management is about water rationing. Noise pollution
is about speech surveillance. Traffic monitoring is about
limiting mobility.
And then of course, energy
Conservation is all about
rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline.
Another concept
one should be familiar with is called geofencing,
and that's think of it as an invisible
fence around you
where you cannot go beyond a certain point,
and that'll be related to your face recognition,
digital identity, and access control. Your smart contracts,
Softbrick can turn off your digital currency beyond
a certain point from your house.
Our world has been turned into a digital
panopticon.
That means you can be monitored,
analyzed,
managed, and monetized.
Surveillance capitalists are already making billions of dollars
selling our information to big corporations
because this kind of detailed knowledge enables them
to predict and influence our behavior.
Well, you guys have seen that before.
I think, you know, for the you know,
Paul just redundancy, I think it's important to
reach the people that may be new and
understand
what that looks like. I mean, that's that's
not
twenty years from now. That's literally that was
possible a decade ago. I mean, that's real
time, guys,
how that's being used. Overlap that with digital
twins and all the other stuff we've talked
about. You know, these are real conversations that
are being used right now. The rest of
it is what's building for the future. And
now, as always, it's not so we're doomed
conversation. The reality is we can and I
can see it making a difference. If we
choose to look beyond the partisan division,
you can we I mean, our actions are
influencing the conversation now. I've said this before.
With all the resources, with all of the
endless, endless resources, money, influence,
you know, the ability to censor
government, corporations. I mean, the overwhelming influence on
the conversation
and and suppression of our platforms, the lawsuits,
and we are still breaking through.
I guess, always think about how powerful that
is. With everything they throw at us, the
we are still, as independent media, still breaking
through the conversation.
That must be frustrating. And the reality is
it's only gonna get harder, but that shows
you that we are making more and more
headway. I think that's important to see. Now
on this point, ghost of, zebra points out
what Chris me Menahan said in regard to
this geofencing point. He said, you know, he
says talking about geofencing, have you seen this?
So they said, oops.
That was weird. Hold on. This platform sucks.
Here we go.
This geofencing campaign would create a digital perimeter
around key Christian gathering places,
delivering targeted pro Israel content and sympathetic anti
Hamas messaging to engaged audiences.
This is from a conversation about what is
being funded through show we just talked about.
Show faith by works to it's it's a
group that was now this is what's interesting.
This is him also pointing out that according
to FARA filings. I said last time that
I wasn't able to find that, but that's
two people now that reported that it could
be being repeated. Just check it out for
yourself. I wasn't able to locate the actual
foreign agent registration act documents about that. Wouldn't
surprise me though because let's realize, I just
think it's interesting since
Israel's not forced to do that in most
every case.
And but I think right now, this is
kind of what I was saying. It's now
it's being right like, the Israeli foreign ministry
is on the record funding people to to
influence the conversation.
That's that's not even secret. So, in a
way, I I wouldn't be surprised if it
was on the far act because Israel as
an agent has to be. But APAC and
the other tools they use have always classically
not been. I think we've just sort of
jumped that conversation. We're now they're just doing
it. But either way, my point is not
to say that's not true. I just thought
I wasn't able to find it. So the
reality is Israel's paying $4,100,000
to conservative
activist,
Chad,
was it?
Shin
Schintger Schintgerz? That's an interesting name.
But his new firm called Show Faith by
Works to target Christians with explicitly pro Israel
content because they're losing traction, guys. And it
says they expect to receive $3.2.00
over five months paid in equal installments.
The quick point is simply that this and
it's an anti Palestinian section of the plan,
is ultimately they're funding this with this idea
to build out this system.
Israel is paying an American firm to hook
Christians up to VR machines and provide them
with the ten seven experience.
So think about how disgusting that is. They're
propaganda fake
snuff film they put around
and make them through VR.
Think about how convincing it'll be to just
show them gore and nasty things that you
or didn't actually happen and then convince them
that that's what the you know, it's it's
horrifying propaganda.
Israel's taking US tax dollars
and using it to hire Americans as foreign
agents to spread this base propaganda
about the genocide.
And he writes, how is it legal? And
then points out that the campaign they're doing
in these locations will be geofenced to control
the flow of information. This is what we're
talking about.
It just which is one aspect that this
already happening. And I will include again my
technocratic tiptoe. This is the four hour show.
All the source material you could possibly imagine,
breaking it all down chronological order.
I think this is the one you should
watch if you wanna get the bigger picture.
I did an hour version of it for
the Salari report in their legislative briefing,
which got a really good response. Briefing for
the state leaders, the digital the digital digital
control grid, how long before the frog hits
the boiling point,
with Ryan Christian.
Now lastly,
bring it to the reality of today. That's
not, like I said, that's not twenty years
from now. ICE just bought new tool to
monitor hundreds of millions of smartphones. You could
pretend if you wanna be blind that it's
only those brown people. No. No. It's everybody.
The and this is the same thing Palantir's
doing. Everybody.
Experts say it's dangerous. Right. Not that dangerous,
but shockingly unconstitutional, but we don't care about
that anymore, apparently.
This is October 2. It says, Immigrate ICE
at is reportedly seeking to buy access
to a powerful suite of highly controversial surveillance
tools that will allow the agency to monitor
people's locations based on data from hundreds of
millions of mobile phones.
Don Bell, policy counsel at the constitution project
at the, at the project on government oversight,
an advocacy group warned that the surveillance tools
could let ICE get around the privacy protections
of the warrant process and the fourth amendment.
All the fake patriots and cons
and constitutionalists
out there, the fake ones, out there cheering
on because that's a bad thing.
Even if it is a bad thing, which
most people would agree on that there's legal
issues and people breaking the law, it's the
principle that you cannot change.
Or really the reality is whether you want
it to, it's a shall not be infringed.
It's inherent. You guys are failing to respect
the reality of the constitution, but it's still
there, which is that these things matter. But
I don't care whether it's we have, you
know look. The point let's just even say,
you have all these illegal immigrants, and without
this tool, it's impossible to catch them.
The argument would still be, well, it's unconstitutional.
Sorry. That's the reality. And even if you
think like, that's one example. The point is
when you break that line, it ruins everything
else too. And the I would argue that
having that exist, which even still may be
a problem, is more important than violating the
constitution as a whole. And if you can't
wrap your mind around that, then you don't
believe in in fair inherent rights. And I'm
even willing to say again, maybe you do
believe that. So let's have an actual conversation
about the merits of that. Make your case.
But if you're out there claiming constitution, shall
not be infringed in every other conversation, then
you're a hypocrite.
Maybe you don't even see that yet.
It says, usually, if law enforcement warrants to
take the your phone, it is interested in
getting your location data that they would need
a warrant.
Yes.
So it may it may not they may
be a small point for you, but you're
violating the rights. And by the way, in
case you still don't know this and it's
shocking that Americans don't know this, even illegal
aliens have constitutional rights. Anybody has constitutional rights
within this country because that was the original
design. It was inherent, god given,
Rights that we outline for humanity, but we're
only able to enforce them within these boundaries.
It's easy to look back and actually read
documentation about what the founding fathers were saying.
People are ignorant today, deliberately, intentionally.
The problem is that, yes, there are few
limitations on that the pro the first point,
there are few limitations on illegal
immigrants and that point. But due process, 100%.
For you know, for yeah. Fourth amendment, 100%.
All it could that in particular says all
persons.
But the problem is that it becomes a
new one it comes blended together and and
you argue I mean, today, it's gone so
far as to people like Loomer saying that
you're not even American if you're born here
but have a different religion or different ideas.
It's just showing you where it's all driving,
and that's coming from Israel lunacy.
But
overall,
green card, Visa,
born here, naturalized, illegal immigrant, all of them
have protection under these rights because they're inherent.
And it says in a redacted acquisition document
obtained by the new tech, the tech news
site four zero four media, the immigration agency
proposes entering into a contract to buy a,
quote, all in one tools from a company
called Penlink
that will allow agents to compile,
process, and validate billions of daily location signals
from hundreds of millions of mobile devices. See
my point? So they're not focusing. They're grabbing
everything and then going we then when they
want to go, they can go that one,
and we'll decide then.
So they're violating the entire country's rights to
make sure they can, if they want to,
go after immigrants or anybody else, by the
way, when that becomes the case.
And the real point is that this company
is Israeli tech. And that means that so
too does Israeli government committing a genocide have
access to current data location of every phone
in this country, or however this applies and
how broadly it is. I think it'll be
the country.
Can you not think about how terrifying that
is with the pager attack, With the fact
that Netanyahu seems to be suggestively floating the
idea that phones in your pockets are connected
to us everywhere in the world
and saying that everyone will pay? These are
terrorists
threatening Americans. Should they I mean, guys, that's
all over this entire conversation, potentially killing Charlie
Kirk.
Documents also mention payments for services involving face
detection, advanced face search, and dark web data
feed.
One of the products,
Tangles, is within the suite of these products,
automatically,
quote, ingest historical data from multiple communication channels,
mobile forensics, Internet based communications, location data, financial
records, web intelligence. Oh, so it's not just
a face scan. I see. It's an all
encompassing mass surveillance tool that's absorbing everything AI
version it can from everywhere on the line,
ever online and then using that to decide
whether you're something. Sure.
Who cares about your constitutional rights?
It goes on to say the company that
originally created Tangles, Cobwebs,
was founded by
wait for it. I'm sure you saw it
coming.
A former member of Israel's elite cyber intelligence
agencies called eighty unit eighty two hundred.
And it was reportedly kicked off of Meta
back in 2021
after allegedly
being found using Facebook and WhatsApp accounts to
snoop on activist and opposition politicians all over
the world. The company later merged with Penlink
in 2023.
Yes. It did.
Cobweb Technologies joins Penlink to expand its digital
investment platform. More specifically,
Penlink, formerly Cobweb Technologies.
Right.
So Cobweb's, which is an Israeli intelligence
entity, becomes Penlink, which is now supplying all
those tools for ice. So Israel has access
to it. There's really no debate here if
you understand the conversation.
And again, okay. But you could be you
know, to be rightly objective, you can argue
that maybe this is the exception.
I'm not saying as a 100% in every
single case, but I'm saying is Israel publicly
says this. Israel publicly does this. Israel publicly
brags about it. And then Israel creates I
mean, should we just play the clip again
for those that might be new? See, this
is why it's important even though I know
that it can be redundant for most people.
You never know who might just be
oh, if I can even find it now,
who might just be new,
who needs to see this to make this
connection. But the point again is creating fake
companies that they can use to manipulate the
world situation. So
why wouldn't they create a fake intelligence company
or real one that they control to be
able to use that data for their purposes?
Like going after Palestinian supporters, like going after
Americans that don't like Israel, or at the
very least targeting them in particular like the
geofencing with the information they need you to
see so you might change your mind.
Is that really that crazy to think about?
Here's what they said publicly about how they
control things like this. How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that has no way been traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor. We create
a pretend world. We are a global production
company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our state.
Yeah. Pretty simple. No.
Rightly so.
Question maybe the maybe 60 men has made
it up. But except when you look into
it, you find out that Israel set it
up. You find out that Israel promotes that
interview, and they brag about it. So it's
not hard to recognize what you can ask
whether Mossad is lying about that. Certainly a
good question. But you can't deny that Israel's
saying that and that they publicly support that
that's what they do all over the world.
And then you could find 75 other examples
of them clumsily bragging about this. But then
when you point to it, you're called an
antisemite by your own government,
who then is allowing this to happen throughout
our country.
Starting to make sense? Hopefully.
So in this case, Tangles, a part of
Cobweb, which is now Penlink, which is an
Israeli created and run company
intelligence rather. And let's be clear. To be
very clear about this,
Penlink,
is is is based in The United States.
Right? But see, what happens is they build
an Israeli tech company that then merges with
that company, and then they have influence through
that company. It's not hard to see. And
you can prove that still is being worked
on by eight unit 8,200
alumni or current members.
And it says and remember, this is after
this is the same company that kicked off
a meta for doing this.
Israeli spyware firm, NSO Group found liable for
hacks of WhatsApp users. That's that's a different
group. It's the same conversation. We'll come back
to that.
It says it the ICE documents also
describe the agency testing out a tool called
Ventel,
whose creators,
the Federal Trade Commission in 2024 accused of
unlawfully tracking and selling sensitive location data, including
information about mobile users, visits to health related
locations,
places of worship.
So you see, the problem is that not
that they didn't know that, but they go,
give me the one that was doing the
the thing that we wanna do, unlawfully tracking
and selling. Give me the data. They know
this is a crime. They know it's unconstitutional.
That's why they wanted them because they're trying
to do this is what I think everywhere
you're looking is happening. I mean, it's not
what I think. You can see it. They're
driving either the precedent setting reality that constitution
is a choice for people in power or
that they just don't care and they're driving
it forward for something a lot more nefarious.
The Trump administration has reportedly restarted a $2,000,000
contract with Paragon Solutions. We reported this in
the beginning. Derek was very clear about this.
Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their
tech during Trump's second term. This is not
a joke.
The NSO group is quite literally not a
an extension of an ex alumni, an actively
Israeli run intelligence entity that is hacking people.
Same thing with all the different group from
WhatsApp users to all sorts of overlapping points.
Proven, guys. You can read the court document.
It's right here.
I mean, it's it's it's crazy how clear
this is. Now with all of that provable
information, why would Donald Trump make a deal
with an Israeli spyware company?
I think I've explained that pretty well. Hopefully,
you're not confused about why that would connect.
It says the company founded in Israel whose
products have been accused of facilitating the surveillance
of journalists and activists. Not accused, found guilty
in court.
But don't I'm not surprised the independent would
pull that punch. It says, Paragon's
zero click graphite program, this is what I
keep talking about. They don't even require you
to click. They send it to your email,
you're compromised.
Graphite program can
quietly invade the mobile phone of its target
and extract its contents even from encrypted apps.
So right now, if that's the reality and
it's infiltrated all of us throughout this entire
country, then there's nothing secret from a genocide
committing government.
And And then, of course, they have the
access to the AI because of a memorandum
of understanding around the AI conversation, and we
know that they're using this unsiloed information to
train all the AI models. It has I
mean, guys, the Israel government knows more about
you today than you do.
I don't think that's even hard. That's not
even a hyperbolic statement.
It says under Trump, ICE has also struck
agreements with fellow government agencies to access highly
sensitive data, including from the IRS and Medicaid.
Fantastic. That sure sounds like a freedom you
know, a a constitution
guided action, doesn't it?
Well, yeah, again, connected
cobweb became that. Here here is the Department
of Homeland Securities,
which what was it? The $2,000,000
contract with an Israeli intelligence company, Paragon Solutions.
And, again, I'll include all the reports that
Derek wrote about this back in 2025,
and it was January, and then this one
was November 2024.
And this is more than just NSO Group
and Paragon. There's a whole bunch in here,
and he lists them off. All of these
different groups, ClearBright, Sellers excuse me. SellBright is
one of the most notorious, and they're working
with Trump. Clearview AI, magnet magnet forensics, Penlink
is right there.
US based company Penlink has also signed a
deal with ICE worth nearly $5,000,000
in exchange for licenses from Penlink, as Forbes
previously reported, has sophisticated wiretapping systems set up
for phone lines across US and is reportedly
working on social media surveillance projects for the
US government.
Israeli tech.
I just don't know why this is not
the most obvious thing in the world. Now
just a quick search for ICE IDF surveillance
tools.
Jason Bachelor has a couple good points. ICE
is rolling out IRIS tech called Morris.
Capable and this is, again, this all all
Israeli tech. Capable of identifying individuals, quote, in
seconds from virtually anywhere. 265
EyePoint. It's more accurate than fingerprints and links
instantly to arrest in immigration databases. Is it
the is this the death of privacy as
we know it?
Leaked emails indicate that ICE is now using
MobileFortify,
a facial recognition tool that lets agents ID
anyone just by pointing a smartphone camera at
their face. It may start with illegal immigrants,
but make no mistake, this technology will be
used against you next.
This is from Jason Paladino. New comically
redacted ice justification to buy more souls
sole source, Cellebrite universal forensic data.
Israeli tech that breaks into your smartphone. Great.
Looks out look at most transparent administration in
history.
Even though it's a lie.
I mean, it just goes on and on,
guys. It's it's wild.
Now I'll play this clip.
It's a short one, but I think it's
important to hear it again.
This is the overlap, and it's this is
and to understand about this clip, this is
just the now reality.
Every other scenario, COVID nineteen, before same thing.
They were using the current thing to justify
the same actions.
So now it's ICE. Now it's immigration. What
it'll do tomorrow? I don't know. But the
solution, I'm willing to bet you will be
the exact same. More of this. Chilling thing
I've seen responding to these immigration rates. I'm
an immigrant rights attorney, and usually I'm a
pretty optimistic guy. I don't get scared easily.
I love watching horror movies. Over the past
six months, I've seen some really disturbing stuff.
At one location, people hid when I showed
up, and I still found them using a
thermal drone that detects body heat. Where was
this On that post, by the way, he's
reading somebody's post about that. That's why it
sounded funny. He's like, he's saying somebody saw
that happen on the ground. Technology first tested
by Israel in occupying
Palestine. When people get taken by ICE, they
often refuse to say their names. So ICE
identifies them using a facial recognition technology.
Where was this tech first used? By Israel
in occupied Palestine. When people refuse to let
ICE search their phones,
ICE will plug their phones into this box,
and it unlocks their phone. Where was this
tech first used? By Israel in occupied Palestine.
I'm willing to bet you that that's either
I mean, it could just be some other
version of hacking, but, again, that may very
well may be your biometrics being used to
unlock that phone. I I actually, somebody in
the chat tell me this. I'm not an
expert, obviously, in this field. Is it possible
to feed the data of the biometric data
that's not like a visual three d thing
into the phone when that somehow unlock biometric?
Like, so a fingerprint, a fingerprint, or a
face scan is on record in the phone,
and they plug it into the box, and
the box has your biometric data, like, on
a digital file in the box. Would that
unlock the phone? Interesting question. Right? Because I'm
not sure how that really works if it
still has to be, like, the visuals, the
camera or something like that. My argument is,
first and foremost, they could just make that
with three d, whatever else. But I'm wondering
if that doesn't need to be done. The
amount of dystopian tech that the US government
has taken from Israel to use in its
own country is terrifying.
I agree. I think it's obvious that this
is happening right in front of us. Now
last few points,
Derrick Rose, a Trump appointed judge on the
fourth is reported on the fourth, rules that,
Trump's deployment
of troops to Portland
is,
he's halting it. Judge
blocks the deployment.
Judge Grant's restraining order halting Trump's deployment of
in of Oregon National Guard.
I I I argue they're gonna find a
way around it either way. And I mean,
they're now deploying National Guard all over the
country. It's it's in it's it's wild to
me of all the people that the right
is I mean,
rather that too many of them seem to
be okay with this because Trump's doing it.
But it's good to see they're pushing back
on this. I think it's we got Trump
or Biden. I think this is a problem.
And then, this is just the Washington Post
reporting on that blocking it. And then, of
course, Trump says he'll send National Guard to
Chicago. It simply says as of today, but
details remain unclear. But as far as I
could tell, it's already happening.
You know, there's already all sorts of action.
Like, I very least ICE, which shows you
this was always kind of mashed together about
all a crime or just immigration or both
going both towards that direction. It's just whatever
they can do to make this happen. There
was a recent shooting that took place in
Chicago, and I'm still unclear on the details,
but they opened fire on a bunch of
people. They claimed the other person had a
gun. It's just it's just we've already seen
examples of them making entire stories up about
people who ran them over the car, but
that didn't even happen, and they opened fire
on a family.
So it's hard to tell. Overall, Kristi Noem
just came out and called it a war
zone. Just like they said with Washington DC,
is Chicago one of the worst yes. It's
a there's a lot of crime.
Shootings all the time. But to call it
a war zone, it's it's
what they're doing it it's the it's what
they said in DC, which was also untrue.
They made this narrative up to argue, and
it wasn't even on the top 30 of
the most criminal ridden cities, but doesn't matter.
They create the narrative about what they want
in the area, and all the screaming idiots
out there will promote whatever they say to
say. With each one amount, a million followers,
it's they just drown out the conversation.
But I don't think every that's not that
that will only sway the people who only
tap into that level of the conversation. Right?
That's why people in the independent media, alliance,
people in independent media are honest, genuinely, like,
that you need to support people like that
out there doing their hard work to try
to find truth and not being swayed by
the partisan game.
As Jason says, the operation Midway Blitz,
a raid
in Chicago apartment complex.
1AM
on the thirtieth, federal agents rappel from helicopters,
kick down doors,
throw flashbang grenades, round up adults screaming naked
children,
some dragged from bed, including US citizens, by
the way, detained, zip tied, including US children
citizens,
placed into U Haul vans, including US citizens,
37 arrested. Not Fallujah, Chicago. A military op
in The United States.
Wait. How long do we need to call
this out?
As we as he writes, we're all the
enemy now. It doesn't matter that you're right
now, that's the focus. If they they've already
rationalized the idea of militarized police, now they're
just conducting military operations in The United States.
Do they I mean, just how in the
world can anybody who cares about any of
the things they pretend to care about not
care that they arrested a bunch of American
citizens? Oh, they just got caught up and
we got the bad guys, so that violated
their rights. Every single one of them. And
on top of that, the idea that you
in any world, it's okay to conduct this
operation on a building full. This is very
Israel Gaza style. Who cares about everybody else
in the way
to go after illegal immigrants?
Like, if your mind is that they're all
rapists, murdering terrorists, then you have fallen for
the entire game. Sure. Some of them just
like some Americans do. The idea that the
point is they're probably just people that have,
like, an expired
visa.
At the end of the day,
either way, it doesn't rationalize the violation of
US citizen rights or their rights as well,
by the way. But, you know, you could
already hear the people that we're talking about
screaming the nonsense over the top of this,
acting like you're somehow un American or somehow
you're a Democrat even though, hopefully, today, we've
at least put to bed some of these
ridiculous double standards.
But we'll leave it there today. Hopefully,
people can continue to ask these questions. I
believe most people are.
Don't be afraid to call it out. Stand
up.
You know, find the courage to believe in
what you mean. You have your opinions. You
have your principles.
Scream about it. Be honest about where you
stand and stop letting the partisan game,
you know,
basically, bull rush over the top of everything.
Because at the end of the day, these
people are gonna continue to do that. They're
gonna continue to push over the top, and
if we let it happen, they'll control the
conversation.
I mean, right now, they're controlling what appears
to be the majority of the conversation, but
we're changing that. All of us are changing
that. Those people standing up in front of
their politician going, we know what you're doing.
They're changing that. You're changing it.
Keep doing
it. I love you all. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.