Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch, issued a report last year,
about
Israel. Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar report,
which the same conclusion,
Israel is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
That's right. The Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority,
they would still have no right to serve
the termination.
So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 10/03/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
I was going through everything I was organizing
today, and
two things that I talk about often that
I'm sure won't shock you, at least from
this platform, kept smacking me in the face
that I just felt were important to
not as if, like, today is the breaking
point, but just, you know, sorta like we
discussed the reality of the funding around, you
know, the terrorist organizations,
I Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the reality of
where that tracks back to that are
shockingly easy to prove.
There's two things today that I think are
relevant that we need to just make sure
we're just not
mincing words about. No mental gymnastics. Just very
obvious. This is no longer
something that we can intelligently deny.
And that is obviously that I think that
the make America great argument that was put
forward, at least where we are now, is
not the first thing.
It's not the forefront of their direction.
You could argue that by helping Israel and
and carrying out more war and more spending
and whatever else you think, all the opposite
of what was promised that maybe that somehow
adds up to making this country great. Maybe.
Certainly certainly possible. It's not what was promised
and certainly not in the immediate interest of
The United States.
And I think it's really important I I
mean, you look around. Look at the partisan
conversation.
One by one, massive prominent MAGA Republican,
you know, reporters, influencers, journalists are coming out
and saying, this is not what I've asked
for. This is not what was supposed to
happen. I I this is not this is
putting Israel before The United States. Who is
making these decisions? What about Pfizer? What about
this self amplifying shot? Every single direction.
So just gotta be honest about this and
stop playing these games and falling into these
traps of the broken logic and the mental
gymnastics of people that have an interest in
selling you on the status quo. And that
is the mainstream alternative media today, as well
as the reality that Zionism
is 100%
on the table right in front of us
influencing policy in this country. That's not something
to be debated anymore. To the degree to
which it's happening is something we can discuss
because the reason I'm saying it like this
is this is not a nuanced point. It's
on the surface. The argument now, as much
as they try to make the battlefield that
that it's a lie, that you can bring
it up, it's antisemitism,
The the argument is that it's not necessarily
wrong.
They're not a foreign agent even though, yes,
it's very obvious. All of the conversation around
Zionism,
APAC, ADL, all these different points, yes, very
much, acting for the interest of a foreign
government on the surface, by the way.
But the the argument is that, well, it's
just an American ally, and we're doing for
the we're working for the interest of this
this American interest from an Israeli perspective. And
but there's it's not really much of a
nuance because you can look and outline outside
of the narratives
that you have political figures, in some case
in many cases, intelligence entities from Israeli intelligence,
government entities from the Israeli government, extensions of
that on the record, like, paid from the
government in a thousand different ways who stand
interconnected
between the US government or literally in the
US government or in corporations or in government
situations that dictate
policy for social media platforms
or media platforms or corporations
or surveillance companies
or cyber technology company. I mean, it's insane.
And they'll publicly state that these things are
being done for the interest of of Israel
with the argument that that's somehow in the
interest of America. And if you dare criticize
that, you must be racist. It's not even
really working anymore. It never really made sense
if you just have a brain to look
into it and work cowed along by people
screaming things at you. And now it's largely
the right doing that. The same thing, they
call that from the left. Why? Because it's
all a one it's a left right two
party illusion game to hide that.
The most obvious thing in front of us
in the entire conversation, probably many other things
too, but let's realize the the linchpin that
this represents
and that the two party illusion in itself
at the same same time, seems to be
losing a lot of steam. Why? Because they're
the same conversation.
That is what keeps you from looking at
that or other things they want to keep
you from seeing. And who do you think
is doing that? All the same people we
talk about and have been lately more than
ever in the in my career because it's
important, I think, to highlight it, that they
have more influence than anybody else even over
corporate media, and they're doing their job, keeping
you trapped in the binary left, right, I
hate the other side. Only they're the problem.
As soon as we can get rid of
them, we're gonna win. As soon as we
get rid of them, we're gonna win. And
it just cycles and tumbles down every single
time.
Now, those two things we have to be
honest about. Today, there's a lot of other
points we'll get into, but you'll see the
central thread. It's insanely obvious from top to
bottom. And, again, I'll point out the ones
that are starting to point this out to
you from left and right. And I'm not
even saying I agree with everybody in you
know, there's
to put it simply, each one of them
in different ways, I could point out things
that I disagree with. My point is that
I think everybody, whatever their interest is, as
long as they're not lost in this two
party paradigm, almost like pro government for the
government agenda
mindset,
we're calling it out. It's very interesting to
see. Even people within the government, like Marjorie
Taylor Greene and others, even though when you'll
notice, they start saying, well, the left is
the terrorist party because that's the real point,
are out there calling out things around Israel.
A weird ADL point that suddenly we're against
the ADL. We'll go into the lie that
that really was. But why are those things
happening?
Because of what we just talked about and
the need to convince you that that's not
really what's going on. That's how I see
it all.
Most of it's proven. But, please, I hope
you will go through the information we present
and look for yourself. Challenge me. Prove that
I'm wrong. Come to your conclusions about it,
but just look at what's being presented today.
Now let's let's start with, one couple quick
points that I want you to see. Now,
largely, what we're gonna get into, I have
a few opening points I want you to
just see, some two party
illusion things that relate to the larger discussion.
But we're gonna get into,
let me see. What was it again? There
was a couple other things that I added.
Oh, that's right. I wanted to reiterate the
Pfizer deal
very reasonably quickly, and I just that's the
whole MAGA overlap. Or a couple interesting partisan
points that I wanna jump into now that
you'll see right in the beginning that I
think are very interesting, Foreign policy points about
Venezuela,
one point about Ukraine and just what that
I think all of these are very much
in the interest of Israel's agenda, and I'll
make my case. As well as the fact
that we'll talk about and I might decide
to skip past briefly or rather just go
over quickly the immigration parts for time. I'm
limited on time today.
But, ultimately,
the main the main part is an update
on the Charlie Kirk conversation, Larry Ellison, Oracle,
social media censorship, and how all of this
seems to be the same conversation.
Now let's start.
Oh, and then if, again, if we have
time, updates on Gaza and the, the deal
around that that we were recently just going
over very in very deep fashion, but I
wanna make sure you saw the kind of
next few steps after what we just discussed.
So I wanna start with
this point to shout out the,
independent media token project that is still ongoing.
It has been increasing, and I think it's
important to see what this this is just
a conversation that I was, unfortunately, unable to
join, but I will be on the next
one where, where Corey, Steve, and and Charlie
were talking about the where it's at, the
development.
And it's just you know, again, for those
who don't remember, it is a great project
that ultimately is I mean, if what I
on what I was thinking about the other
day, what I find interesting is even if
it doesn't succeed,
shortly enough, you're going to see the effort
to make us so, which will be giving
grants for nothing to people who need it
in the independent media. And that's to even
say hypothetically, this thing fails. The point is
those things are still going to happen because
the the game plan is to give away
free money to independent media who would don't
otherwise get it for nonpartisan objective type of
work. And then if there's an if people
hopefully see the obvious virtue in something like
that, can go out and spend a dollar
for, you know, what? It's point zero zero
zero zero one at this point, get yourself
a 100,000 of them, and maybe, you know,
that's your donation to the idea. And hopefully,
if this builds, we'll all benefit.
Most importantly,
average unknown independent media people out there trying
to make it work and doing it the
right way. Sort of like the same way
independent media token is doing it in a
world full of manipulation.
Now whatever you're
and rightly so, I agree, skepticism about all
cryptocurrency,
I don't I find it hard. I'm interested
to hear what you might say, how you
could see something that gives free money away
to independent media as a bad thing. But
I get it. Skepticism is right is is
important today. But I'm glad to see this
improving. I'm I'm looking forward to the way
it continues to go forward, and I hope
to hopefully join the next conversation on this.
And I would love to see some money
go to people. You know, I can only
imagine how that would help me if I
when I was just starting doing this, And
I, you know, I'd use now for quite
frankly, but if the point is not not
gonna be us. That's not gonna happen because
that would be give me that if I
was outside and I saw that, I would
think that was weird. It's gonna be, obviously,
if ever us, probably not, be focusing on
people on the lower end of this who
are out there doing great work that we
decide as the board but ultimately are getting
suppressed and censored, ignored largely because probably nonpartisan
and going after the right things and hopefully
dump some money in their lap and say,
build your project better, make your documentary.
How amazing would that have been for us
in the very beginning? You know? That's that's
the idea. So just wanna point that out
again, and we'll circle back to it as
we go forward. Now the image I took
from today, which I just have to say
is one of the most
in like, it you know, the whole the
saying an image, what is it? The
What's the blank on that?
Something is a thousand words. What what is
the saying? Why am I blanking on all
of a sudden?
Image is a you know, whatever. You know
what I'm getting at. The point is that
an image, you know, that there's so it
it just it really does
give you
there's so much you know, you could read
into it. It's subjective. Let's make that clear.
It's my opinion.
But, man, does that speak volumes.
The idea that he's sitting in in in
in the, what is it, the Oval Office,
right, with other people in there with him,
holding the phone for Netanyahu,
hold my beer kind of thing, or I
guess that doesn't really apply. But the point
is that he's holding the phone and and,
like,
visibly looks uncomfortable and happy. I just thought
that was
very, very
I don't know. It stands out to me,
and it really does speak volumes. A picture
is worth it's worth a thousand words. Thank
you, Katie. I don't know why I couldn't
get worth was the word I was missing.
But I don't know. You tell me. I
just look. I mean, just look at that
face. You don't fake that. I don't know.
I found that very, very telling. You know?
And what I mean, to me, what somebody
who's such a narcissistic person, why would he
do that in a room full of other
people? And my personal gut, because he's not
the one making the decisions here. White House
has released a photo of Donald Trump holding
the phone in his lap as Netanyahu read
the apology letter to Cutter. Right. The Cutter,
you know, the place that they murdered a
bunch of innocent people and bombed the gov
I mean, while they were negotiating, by the
way. Oops. Sorry, Netanyahu says, because we made
a mistake. No. No. That was very coordinated,
and his fake apology is supposed to make
it all better. Any case,
we had a great panel about free speech
that I hope you won't miss. Free speech
or limited speech, there are no other choices.
Really great conversation, I think, and it's important
to you know, my point, you guys watch
this show, that I think it's important to
air very aggressively on the side of the
principle today. And how can it be wrong
to air on the side of the principle
of the constitution? Of course, you'll call freight
call it terrorist by left or right depending
on what season it is, I guess.
Great conversation.
The what the version had gone out, Jason,
I believe, put it out in two parts.
So, ultimately, if you get confused by that,
just check, well, the the full version right
here for the Independent Media Alliance. And I
think it's important to get into this and
and ask yourself these questions and really debate
the merit of where this is. I mean,
because look. I want to have a conversation
with somebody who truly believes
that maybe these things should be limited. I
don't believe that. I think it's that's unconstitutional.
But maybe your argument is that's where we
need to go for x, y, and z.
And if you have a like, an educated,
passionate argument, lay out your case. I'd love
to hear it and have an amicable conversation
about it. We just don't have that anymore.
Because I'm arguing that it's the opposite. We
should be going hard the other direction, that
there is no place in which words can
be deemed violence or a crime in any
context.
Because realistically, that is the reality of free
speech. I don't know how we ever got
away from that. We have a conversation about
fire in a theater, and, you know, we
get into some good points in this. But
I argue people just me just saying that
will be framed by the power structures today
as me being a terrorist. That's how crazy
this has gotten. Or you can go back
if you have so many years and recognize
they were calling people who were believing too,
direct quote, by the way, from the gov
the state department, believing too much in the
constitution,
put you on a list as a possible
terrorist.
That's not a joke, by the way, believing
too much in the foundational documents of this
country. So what that means is understanding the
reality of, for example, that we could, I
don't know, alter or abolish the government should
we realize that they're not acting in our
interest. To them, that makes you a terrorist.
That makes them no longer in line with
the constitution. So, let's figure out what that
really means. Think about that. And in no
way am I ever calling for violence. And
you guys know that. I've said it my
entire career because I'm not. I don't believe
that's the answer, but that's what they would
want that to to imply
that I'm somehow anti government. So and then
here's the game today. Right? So if I
just said that today and somebody went out
and shot up a government building, does that
make that my fault? No. It does not.
Not one, I never said that. No. Two,
I would never advocate for that. And three,
I didn't do that. But you see, that's
the game they're playing today. Much more nuanced
points are coming around where it's very much
it's, you know, more difficult to make that
decision. But it's pretty simple if you just
on the principle, which is what it should
always have been. Now watch this. I go
I think it's a really good conversation. Now
two points on free speech
That's just or actually three that I thought
were very interesting.
So we get in this game right now
where both sides like to pretend to advocate
for the actual free speech, but point out
the other side's things as the one that
doesn't apply.
All they're doing is creating escape, a loophole,
a scapegoat. They're creating a situation where they
get you to rationalize why you should ignore
inalienable rights, but only when that happens when
they do it. No. That does that's just
that's their decision. It's it's if it's if
you're choosing to ignore it, then you don't
believe in it. Or you open the door
for it to be applied, whatever some power
structure decides, and that's not how these things
are supposed. That's not the reality of an
inalienable god given right. Now
this person writes a ridiculous article.
Abolishing whiteness has never been more urgent. And
that would be equally as ridiculous as kinda
what Elon's getting at, but I think using
it against you, as for any other version
of that. Abolishing blackness, abolishing Jewish, abolishing Christian,
abolish race or religion or anything, that would
be ridiculous.
Just to make the because it's it's broad
stroke. It's ridiculous. It is the definition of
racism to say everybody this color is the
same. Everybody with this religion is the same
thing. It's bigoted. It is ridiculous. It's not
woke to point that out. It's the definition
of the word. But it's different. I I
you could do and say whatever you want
because that's your right. I have every right
to say I think you're disgusting. Anything beyond
that, government involved in any way, firing anything
else outside of an individual making a choice
about their private enterprise
is a problem.
I I mean, it's very simple, guys. You
it even, like, fire a theater kind of
point. The point as I said in the
show.
An individual can sue you for that. The
owner of the building can sue you for
what you did, and a judge can make
a decision as they want. It's actually pretty
simple. They can look at the case and
go, yep. That was your responsibility. I'm gonna
charge you. Somebody can appeal that later. The
reality is anytime the government gets involved is
when it becomes a violation of your rights
or censorship or rather free speech issue.
Most people don't really understand free speech or
censorship in that context. They think somebody deletes
a comment on a platform, oh, censorship. If
the government did it, yes. And the, you
know, the fine line we get into is
if the government's involved
with a platform, we talk about that. It
makes that line very fuzzy, and that's why
they did that. Anyway,
so he says abolishing whiteness has never been
more urgent, the article anyway. Elon Musk says,
it's not okay to say this about any
group. Now I'm not saying Elon's suggesting censorship.
I get the sense that that's where he
kinda wants this to go just because he's
manipulative in my opinion. But what he says
is, right, you know, not okay,
not illegal,
but not okay to say. Yeah. We can
all agree. That's a gross thing to say
about anybody, but, you know, that it's okay
for them to say another they're doing this
about Muslims right now. So it's the whole
ridiculous game. But
what would you think if he said that
has to be taken down? You can't say
that just like they can't say okay. I
disagree. It's the same kind of point. Right?
Just like them saying, you know, anybody doing
that is allowed to say it, but it's
equally ridiculous when they do and we have
the right to point it out. But I
get the sense that they're trying to play
that game again where they're the ones that
need to be taken down for x, y,
and z. And this is happening all over
the place. Here's another example.
Captain Dreamer highlights this article, I guess, that
says, Turning Point USA, a case study of
a hard right twenty twenty four. How dare
they have an opinion?
They're literally making this a big deal.
You can disagree with thinking it's far right.
They have an opinion to think of whatever
they want. Outline a case even if their
case is you're disgusting and racist and terrible
person and don't deserve to live. Oh, no.
Does that mean they call for debt? Guys,
this is the government pushing you into being
the the pearl clutching just like you're calling
out about the left if you think you're
on the right.
I would agree. That's very tasteless. No decor.
You but the point is they have a
right to say what they want, and that's
not even as far as this goes. They're
simply just calling it a hard right. And
they say, we cannot let the SPLC get
away
with pushing the same rhetoric about Charlie Kirkister.
Get away with saying things? Oh my god.
You're just like the left, or rather the
team sports side. Again, to be clear as
always for those news of the show,
I think most people, liberal or or conservative
right now, aren't ridiculous and are aware that
their free speech is important, but have issues
in certain areas where they've been convinced that
shouldn't go that far. Now that's my point.
We can disagree on that. You can argue
there's a line, but then admit that you
want limited speech, and we can agree and
have a conversation. The point is most of
these people don't do that. I'm a free
speech absolutist and then go, but that's just
violence.
That's a lot too far. No. In fact,
it's not. That's not even close to even
something you would overlap with violence. They just
have an opinion that you find offensive, and
you're doing exactly what you thought was the
most ridiculous snowflake thing when the right the
left did it about woke ideas and hate
speech, which is the same thing you're doing
about decenitism, by the way. It says, in
May, they called the Turning Point USA a
hard right group under report.
So that's why they killed him. Right? Their
fault dismantled censorship. No. You guys are all
falling for the most easy trap I've ever
seen. Elon Musk says incitement to violence by
evil propaganda. See? This is getting people killed.
So now you're telling me that nobody's allowed
to say anybody else is what they think
they are for the worry that that person
might do something? And, I mean, are we
actually not this should be laughed at.
Elon Musk doesn't believe in free speech, even
remotely. If he's gonna tell us that somebody
calling a group hard right is enough to
get somebody killed, therefore, you're not allowed to
say it, or that it's not even or
worse than that, guys, that it's incitement to
violence, therefore, you can be arrested for that.
I just have to really stress how wildly
over the top this is.
I mean, are you not are you guys
literally calling the entire left a terrorist organization
and then clutching your pearls at the words
hard right?
We this is why I'm trying to stress
that most people I mean,
if most people are in this category, we're
doomed.
Like, period.
I don't think that's where we are because
that's pretty clear that they wouldn't be trying
to aggressively propagandize everybody if everybody was already
there.
Think about that.
So this is the minority, and most Americans
have been tricked that we're a good place
fighting for good things, rather the government, I
mean, and are still of the mind that
we believe in the constitution even if they
have a line. This is pushing us too
far. And it's the left or the right
literally becoming what they called out about the
left. It's very, very transparent.
Marjorie Taylor Greene says paid social media influencers
should have a
signifying badge
or better or different color check mark informing
the public about their account is paid for
okay. Paid content. Now that might I mean,
that that might I had to think about
this one for a minute because there's a
logic to the idea of people who are
paid influencers. Right? But here's the thing. This
will, one, absolutely be manipulated by these structures
and the government, and two,
is censor is free speech an issue at
the end of the day because of that?
But the reality here is first.
If they did this, you I mean, guys,
they do this already. You're supposed to do
this if you're being paid to do it.
People just lie about that. So all this
will do is be a badge if those
are willing to admit it. All the Zionist
influencers, all the China influencers, all the same
thing. They wouldn't admit it because they want
to. So that's ridiculous. So at the end
of the day, this is just a way
to send to put it on people that
they want to for their own propaganda reasons.
Think about that for a second. I find
that really interesting because this is masquerading as
logic,
but it won't work that way because none
of them really want it to. That's my
opinion anyway.
So let's talk about two party illusion stuff
before we get into Pfizer,
foreign policy,
Charlie Kirk,
Gaza Israel.
You might have seen this video.
I mean and this it's got some very
interesting responses from people. And it's got some
pretty good reach in general. I think it
resonates with people.
So this video,
Donald Trump put on his true social.
And as as a patriot voice wrote, Trump
just posted this on true social, and I
all I can say is w t f.
Let me I'll play it first. Just do
a little bit of it, and then I'll
they have more context for what I have
to say. It's
embarrassing.
You know, dems your babies. I mean, this
is like kindergarten stuff, guys, and it's like
I honestly think that's kind of the point.
I I don't think that that's I think
it's a choice
to make it this ridiculous. Not that it's
just our I mean, look. It's kind of
I could be wrong. I mean, that's what's
crazy. It could just be that that's what
they think is funny and cool, and it's
it's, I mean, it's wildly ridiculous.
Not only there's a lack of decorum,
talking about we're trying to make things you're
it's divisive. You're trying to cause division.
Not these ones, but them all of the
you know what else? I'm not gonna say
he made that, but he posted it. So
it's the same difference. And it's just this
ongoing thing where you're you're I mean, is
that not incitement to biology? You're talking about
killing the reaper? You know? You put a
bull's eye, oh my god. They mean to
kill him. What do you think the reaper
means? But see, I'm not a child. I'm
not gonna say that that new we know
that it meant the kill because it's an
assumption.
But see, they both
team sport politics game sides will do that.
But this is just sad because it's about
trying to cause hatred. It's trying to cause
people to get angry and outraged and, you
know, just lose themselves in stupid things like
this.
And, of course, that gets into the whole
thing about the shutdown. It's, you know, the
the stupid game about this, the way it
always goes. If you're nonpartisan, it's just noise.
But now, oh, they did this, and they
shut it down. We're gonna do the Trump's
taking advantage of it like they do every
single time. And at the end of the
day, this is somebody connected to project twenty
twenty five, and, oh my god, it's just
this whole noise, which there's meaning to it.
There's there's something there's worth looking into for
sure.
Actions are what I care about.
So I said, whether you want to admit
it to yourself or not, and it's not
about left and right, this government is the
laughing stock of the world right now. And
for more reason than you may want to
realize, we are being played and laughed at.
Speak out about it.
It's not meant to be so, again, not
left or right. It's not about the current
event. It is the reality. I mean, it's
not hard to see either. Now to be
clear, somebody commented before, I'm not saying we
should necessarily care what others think about
per I mean, I don't we just people
shouldn't care what others think about them inherently
unless it's somehow something worth, you know, you're
interested to find out. Right? That's that's a
a self confidence issue. I don't who cares
they think? I'm gonna be confident about the
same thing. You it's not necessarily important to
care what the rest of the world thinks
about our but that's not my point is.
My point is that I care about this
country. And so whether or not they think
that, I look at it, and I'm going,
what the hell is going on? How did
we get here? This is embarrassing. I think
most Americans, if you just look outside of
the controlled spheres, see it. They're calling it
out, left and right too, even within the
game. This is crazy. The world is laughing
at us. Now it's not because my point
was I'm not caring because they think that.
I think it's interesting to see people who
are not lost within our political game who
can look around and say all of that
is crazy.
Just like we can look at countries and
go, wow. That's kinda crazy right now. That's
what's happening. The world sees this and we
look ridiculous. Now, why would that be the
case? Is that in the interest of American
politics? No. Not even remotely. But, see, the
question is always is who benefits from something
like that? You could think about that. I'm
not even saying I know for a fact.
Think about it, though. What is happening right
now that makes sense? Why would they be
doing and on the the dumb video aside,
all of the other actions that clearly are
in the the interest of something other than
Americans, other than even American government.
It's time to ask these questions, guys.
Now this is just the one quick overlap
to the shutdown point.
This is just so ridiculous to me. Donald
Trump administration reportedly
hacked hijacked, excuse me, not hacked, hijacked employees'
accounts
while they were on shutdown, whatever that. Hey.
Hashtag keep it shut down. Right? And in
the event the less government, the better.
But they they hijacked their accounts to send
emails to people
blaming Democrats for the shutdown.
Even though it's obviously a two party game
here, guys, and, of course, the lie they
keep spinning about giving illegals, you know, health
care. Now look. There's some level of truth
to this overarching conversation, but what they keep
screaming is just simply not true. And it's
embarrassing, and you could look for yourself. But
they do it because that's the game. Again,
both sides are playing this game. It's always
the same thing. Overall,
this is just small, petty stuff. Those are
the people who are running this country.
Small, petty,
small people.
Now Matt Gates points something out I think
is interesting on the overlap. They're showing you
the weirdness of the two party game right
now. It's all over the place.
Alex Jones puts out high level DOJ sources
have confirmed. Yeah. Just like they confirmed to
him months ago that the Ukraine war was
over, like they confirmed to him months ago
that Netanyahu and Trump were breaking up, like
they confirmed during World War three, on and
on and on, you know, with that Alex
Jones was wrong jar is overflowing, but we
keep hearing the opposite. The bottom line is
he says this.
So did you confirm that, or are you
just repeating reflexively whatever the CIA informants tell
you? He keeps getting things wrong based on
these high level sources, so why would we
keep or how about the other one? How
about the,
how about this one?
Not that I get too distracted here.
Oh, come on.
That popped up a second ago when I
was doing it. I guess not now.
Oh, well.
Here real quick.
The point was
a claim
that all of these people
were gonna go to jail.
And I think it's important to recognize where
we currently are.
Oh, that was me. Sorry.
In
case you guys forget how to do this.
I think there's a faster way to do
this today. Somebody was saying it the other
day, but this is just what I'm used
to.
I'm sure it's gonna be right here. There
we go.
Okay. So same thing. August 23, big, big
actions coming from the DOJ. What was that
that Obama, Comey?
What about Comey? What's going on? Yeah. It's
in the process. Right? I know. We'll see
how it ends up. The evidence already clearly
is panning out to be a nothing burger,
but let's keep hoping and hoping and hoping.
Copium. Hopium.
But I said again, followed up on the
twenty ninth, hey. Any update? These big, big,
big actions coming. Well, let's see how long
this continues to not be there. I hope
it does. I genuinely hope they go to
jail, but I hope you both paradigms, the
whole of the government is held accountable.
But I just want you to recognize how
often that happens. But, okay, today, big d
DNA sources confirm investigative journalist Emerald Johnson Robertson,
excuse me, that deputy AG Todd Blanche is
sabotaging
Trump's war against the deep state, whatever that
means to you. Seeing as how everyone's got
a different definition, to, Jones, it stupidly means
just the left apparently, even though it makes
no sense for a deep state power structure
to only go after one side of a
party structure. It's all it's all stupid. But,
yeah, whatever that means to you, the sabotaging
the thing they're doing,
maybe. I'm not even getting into that. Maybe.
Who knows? Maybe it's true. I think I
thought it was interesting. Matt Gaetz says this
is absolutely false. Todd Blanch is a patriot
and has been standing with president Trump for
years now in the courtroom and now with
the DOJ. I'm in contact with folks at
the justice department, and Todd is the reason
this is what's interesting.
He's the reason so many great things like
the Antifa terror designation have happened. By the
way, he hired January 6, sir.
So how do you make sense of that?
Is somebody misleading Jones to make that the
case? Is this too is that Israel informing
him? In that case, it's coming from the
who knows? But this is so interesting as
they're both supposed to be on the right.
They're both supposed to be fighting for the
You tell me. Like, maybe he's just misinformed.
That's also that's probably the most likely when
dealing with Alex Jones. But overall, the reality
is interesting to me that he's behind the
Antifa point. That, you know, it's just it's,
it's very interesting. I'm not even saying I
have the answer. It's just conflicting, and I
think that's interesting within this field. And Maga,
Granny says, once again, Alex Jones is a
lying POS.
Why does any sane person watch him? He's
a psycho who makes money off of other
psychos. Take off the foil hats. Blanche is
one of us. I don't know if you
heard that. I think Blanche is part of
the system. What's funny is these are people
within the Maga side who are calling us
out. I just want you guys to sense
that outside of the game that everybody like,
the the highlight as the full thing, it's
all over the place when you really get
into the weeds.
Now this was a funny point. This was
on October 1.
This is Jason Cohen, formal liberal Democrat,
Alan Dershowitz,
a former former Democrat, goes scorched earth on
the Democratic party. Don't you love so this
just it's so funny how I'm like, yep.
What does that show you? To the blind
children of the partisan team sport politics game,
we're winning.
Except, wait. Isn't he a deep state pedophile
democrat? But he's on our side now. Yay.
Okay.
That seems to make no sense whatsoever, but
it's just like everybody else that was at
Trump's inauguration and everybody else that was the
deep state globalist technocrat Zionist. But, no, it's
okay. They're on our team now. So doesn't
that make you the bad guys?
Or it's all the same thing. That's just
really the point. Overall,
I said, so when all the terrible people
that the Republican teams for politics players were
telling us were absolutely gonna go to jail
under Donald Trump,
under Trump's
oh, sorry. I'm just read reading it quick
too quickly. When all the terrible people that
the TeamSport politics players were telling us were
absolutely going to jail under Trump start joining
the team,
And not only do they not call this
out, they cheer. What does that show you?
I mean,
to for me, Alan Dershowitz is a like
all the rest of them, he's trying to
run to the team that he thinks that
he's they just they don't care about left
and right. They care about using the power
structure to benefit and hide their
disgusting criminal activities.
So he's going, yeah. I'm a I'm a
Republican now. Does that make me safe?
Either way, if you're if you're on this
team that's now welcoming Alan Alan Dershowitz, you
might wanna think twice about what that shows
you. And then realize that both sides are
doing it. Now one quick thing that I
thought was just very telling from the partisan
side of this,
this whole weird Trump coin thing. Again, it's
for all I know, it could very well
just be a head fake to get people
doing this.
We're not gonna waste too much time on
it, but I find it interesting
for one main reason.
This says no. This is from the government,
by the way. This is US treasurer,
Brandon Beach, and he says, no fake news
here.
These first drafts,
drafts honoring America's 200
America's 200 and fiftieth birthday and POTUS are
real. They're literally gonna make a coin with
Donald Trump. That's what they're telling you, and
these are the people that would do it.
Except this person rightly goes, but, what about
the law there, guys?
And that's she did very right, in fact.
I didn't I hadn't did not I mean,
I I historically, I can look back and
and see that that's never happened before, but
I didn't know that that was actually against
the law, but it makes sense now. The
sec well, the the point she cites was
was b right here, and I'll read it
to you.
The sec this is the general overlay overlap
of this exact practice of the making coins.
The secretary of the secretary of treasury may
mint and issue only the following coins, and
it goes on to make us, you know,
sizes and differences. Right? Then it says the
half dollar, quarter dollar oh, is that the
right one?
No. It's further.
Right.
Hold on.
I can't type. Oh shoot. Damn it. Sorry
guys.
My computer's been acting so I don't even
think I hit that.
Okay.
Here we go.
The United States
coins shall have the inscription in god we
trust. And I was curious if that yeah.
It does say that. And then it says
the the
obverse side of each coin shall have the
inscription liberty. The reverse side of each coin
shall have the inscription United States Of America
and the e pluribus unum and a description
of the value of the coin. The design
on the reverse side of the dollar, half
dollar, quarter dollar, is an eagle subject to
the other provisions of the subject. The averse,
where was it again? Right here. The
from 2005 shall bear the likeness of Thomas
Jefferson, the reverse.
Make sure wait. I'm always getting the wrong
spot. Here's right here.
Only the portrait. Did I miss that right
there?
I could just tell you this, but it's
always important for me to make sure you
guys see it
right from what it reads.
Hold on. How am I missing this?
Here here's this is directly from the the
grok point, by the way. I should've just
highlighted this earlier. It's right basically, when asked
about this in general oh, and I wanna
make a point about, the I'll I'll say
it after this.
It's I've been simply asked, is it is
this against the law? That I wasn't aware.
The proposal about the Trump coin, and it
simply says, is it illegal? And it says,
yes. The proposal appears to violate federal law
as it currently stands, and it specifically cites
the same point
that ultimately, it has to appear the the
name of the individual shall be of the
only the departure of a deceased individual may
appear
on the currency.
How weird. Did that like, I'm I'm starting
to think that this might have gotten altered
since we went live. It's right here. No
issue. No coin issue under this this may
bear the image of a living former current
president. Okay. This is really interesting.
I'm gonna do this really quickly, and I
swear to you, if we caught another live
altar
how interesting.
Because look. What's the reason I'm saying that
is because look. I just read it to
you right from the page. I don't waste
too much time on this. It still says
it right there, very very specifically
that no
coin issued in in this may bear it
has to have a
where was it?
No coin issued under this subsection may bear
the image of a living former or current
president
or of any deceased former president for two
years period following the date of the death.
So it's supposed to be, like, two years
at least.
And what I'm wondering is this under b.
Sorry. Bear with me. I'm interested in this.
I can't type today.
Okay. So this is the one we're looking
for under c.
That's a long way to do that.
There wait. There we go.
How interesting. I just I don't wanna just
have to scroll through this whole long thing
and find it. But so what I'm pointing
out to you guys, if you're just not
following, is that this image
says very specifically there that what it only
seems to say on this one
under e,
which is really interesting. So what I'm wondering,
which is the same point, by the way.
It's the same it's the same reality of
the coin, is that I'm wondering if while
we were doing this, something went somebody jumped
in there and tried to edit it thinking
that was a problem and didn't delete the
other versions of it. Completely what's just in
my head right
now. Tell me what you guys think. Because
this is the reality. I looked into this
before we started.
I was seeing if it said, like, updated
or anything. Anyway, no worries. I'm realizing I'm
short on time today, so let me get
back to the point, Ryan.
Let me do one more thing. Buy America,
act.
What?
This is strange.
Because this is the same
the same page.
Commonly referred.
Weird.
Okay. You tell me. I'm gonna go back
afterward. I don't have I don't want you
to sit here while I go through this
very long page. To me, this looks like
something changed.
Because that was the same thing from before.
Any case.
So reiterating the point,
it is and what's even funnier is this
is what it says here too.
Somebody responded by going, hey, Rock. Is that
against the law? Rock says yes. US law
prohibits portraits of living persons on currency. Just
funny to me that they're like, they people
love to try to do that, and then
when they don't get this wrong, they are.
I'm sure they just ignore it. But don't
trust Grock. The point I was gonna make
is that apparently,
Ian Carroll came out with a whole video
saying,
I may make something, and I don't you
know, basically, ditch Google, use AI. And I
you know, look. We had a whole conversation
about this on an IMA panel. And I
I I was very honest about it. You
know, it's it's something that is clearly you
know, there is a value to it. You
see me here and there use it. I
try my best to get away from it.
There are some times where it seems like
there's value to it, mostly for me to
kind of use it as a counterbalance from,
like, a partisan view.
But it's it's it's something that we need
to be very, very, very skeptical about. And
what's interesting is the last
thing we should do is ditch this and
go all in. We should use the tools
in front of us and be very skeptical.
Like, you get a Google search, you blindly
take it to face value. You should AI
is wrong all the time. So it's weird
that this big push, very highly produced video
for me and Carol going use Grok and
AI when all that's happening. It seems very
strange to me. Question everything, guys. That's always
how it has to be. But the point
is that this is apparently illegal. So
the fact that they're doing it anyway either
means they don't care about the reality of
the law or they're doing it just to
get a response. I find that really interesting.
Either one makes sense with where we are
today. Doesn't it? These people just don't seem
to care at all about the reality of
the law when it comes to what they
want to accomplish, and it appears to be
illegal.
Interesting. Now on the Pfizer point of this
and health in general, I and all of
this this in particular very much connects with
Israel because of all the different overlaps with
Pfizer, specifically, Pfizer's lab in Israel and all
the different things with the injections,
the parts of that that were made in
Israel, all the different examples of how this
interconnects.
And the Stargate point we'll get to, but
this first, I just really think it's insane
to me that this is happening yet again.
Strike Pfizer strikes a 70,000,000,000
deal dollar deal with The US to expand
its mRNA empire.
And this is where the whole Trump Rx
comes into play, by the way. And I
think good point. Sasha Latipova
made this great point. Trump is a registered
trademark in The United States and internationally owned
mainly by the Trump Organization and its affiliates.
Meaning, to cut to the chase, if they're
using Trump r x,
they're getting money for that. Now it's possible
he waived it, but that doesn't seem to
be the case. And I think that's really
interesting. Overall, everything about this, whether it's a
socialism point, whether it's a fascism point, whether
it's a prop profiteering point, or the fact
that he's literally fast tracking you Pfizer drugs.
Why is that anything MAGA or MAHA to
anybody other unless those things both do you
mean blindly support Trump?
Here is
what,
Brooke Jackson's lawyer had to say about this.
And I found this interesting, and well as
well as some follow ups that I want
you to see that continue to show you
that and by the way, let's not forget.
We had this interview with Brooke Jackson on
the 2025
of May 2025. Title, meet the new boss,
same as the old boss. She was very
adamant the fact that Trump has sided with
Pfizer. Here's the tweet right here.
Trump sides with Pfizer,
04/28/2025.
And if you don't remember, we've had four
interviews with her now. They'll be at the
bottom of this article.
First one, second one, third one, and this
is the fourth one we're on right now.
All of them are absolutely,
completely unequivocal. You can watch the data. You
can or rather look at the data, watch
the interview.
They're caught. And their argument at the end
of the day is, well, we paid for
the lie that we were that we sold,
or they paid us for the lie we
sold, essentially, paraphrasing.
It's just they're they're lying to you guys.
Trump knows that. They are absolutely spitting in
your face with every step like this.
That's why more and more people are calling
it out.
Now the sense receptor points out, Pfizer's whistleblower,
Brooke Jackson's lawyer,
Just rehashing what it says. I'll just play
it for you. Basically, breaks down the reality
and the nuance of where it currently is,
and I think it's an informal an informational
point. Case has become so complicated. I I
really don't even know how to explain it
anymore. So the floor is yours. Tell us
what's going on.
Well, it's I I'm gonna uncomplicate it for
you a bit.
So, you know, a lot of people talk
about the EUA and some other issues, but,
fundamentally,
Pfizer contracted
for a safe and effective vaccine for COVID
nineteen.
That is far from what they delivered.
On top of that, they were supposed to
we can talk about this in a minute.
They were supposed to deliver this drug
following current good manufacturing
practices. It's right in the contracts,
and they didn't do that either, and we
can go into that issue.
But what happened in the process of litigating
this case is the federal government decided
that this case somehow was contrary to the
public health policy of The United States,
and it came in and asserted that under
the Biden administration.
Right. Because knowing the truth of how they
tried to kill you is counter to their
interests. I think that's pretty clear. But they
frame they conflate that with your interests. See,
when they say American interest, they mean their
interests.
Not the same thing. The government is not
this country. And the judge dismissed it, so
now it's on appeal.
They had no good cause to dismiss Brooke
Jackson's case.
None whatsoever. They couldn't there there is a
sort of a standard at,
DOJ in terms of when you would step
in to dismiss one of these cases.
They didn't meet any of those standards. They
couldn't prove any good cause, but the judge
went ahead and and allowed the federal government
to step in and dismiss the case and
stop our litigation and stop our discovery against
Pfizer
just based on the federal government's say so.
We we are still,
and we were hopeful,
when the administration
changed in January
that we would have a change in position,
within this administration.
And, certainly, Bobby Kennedy knows all about the
Pfizer fraud,
and he is the client of the DOJ
in this case.
So we are you know, we continue to
appeal to Bobby and the administration
to change a position on this case, and
let us do the work. We're willing to
do the work for the American people to
get the discovery and find out everything that
that Pfizer did.
Yeah. And and what, though Is that simple?
Frustrating.
Yeah. It is. But what you know, are
we missing the elephant in the room that
he didn't I mean, you know, we're appealing
to him. In other words, they're doing the
same thing. I hate the soft footing when
it comes to RFK Jr. Be honest about
it. I I it makes me mad too,
and I see all of his past amazing
work that I still support too. He is
or his administration he's a part of is
doing the same thing Biden's administration did. They're
not like, to continue to try to appeal
to him means they've already stopped it as
Brooke points out. But you see how they
frame the one side is they put an
absolute stop to it and they ignored it.
And then the the second part was we're
continuing to appeal, RK junior, as in somehow
that's going to change? Why would it change?
Yeah. I just I mean, I hope so.
Kills me, though. Right? I mean, Mary Talibotan
is calling this stuff out all the time,
by the way.
So here, it continues.
RFK Junior knows this is sense receptor pointing
this out, that the COVID jabs constitute mass
murder, literally. He does. And yet this is
still what's happening.
I'm gonna let you go, Sasha. But before
I do,
I'm an attorney.
I try to figure out ways to sue
people like this.
And, you know, the one of the frustrating
things during this pandemic is that the PREP
Act, the the CARE Act, and the 1986
VICA vaccine act
have all bestowed broad,
immunity
from liability under all of these actors. So
Remember, this is why he was not in
power. They're getting away literally with murder, with
Mhmm. AM, with mass murder. They're getting away
with it
because
they have been given this bubble of the
shield of immunity from liability.
You have an expertise
Which still exists.
In,
in corporate liability
as a corporate liability officer.
Do you see
any obvious place where somebody like me can
file a lawsuit and get redressed for some
of these,
illegal acts?
Yeah. So,
first of all,
neither me nor my colleagues,
discourage anyone from doing just that, to just
going after Pfizer because of all the fraud
that they have committed.
I think what the the problem is we're
all having,
we don't know,
exactly what's going to crack that that wall,
but we have to attempt
different ways.
Now the yes. We can try going after
Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the
lay of the land. This is the the
defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked
it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we
did not defraud the government.
We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.
And that's a even Which gay? Oh, and
Brooke That was the point I was referencing.
That's the exact way it was said. How
incredible is that? Jackson. In Brooke Jackson's in
April, they filed motion to dismiss.
So and while, you know, the case may
be dismissed,
he hasn't been dismissed.
But in let's say in the future, it
gets dismissed because because of this. That admission
alone
is priceless, and we need to elicit these
admissions in court. They need to tell us
ultimately ultimately
so whatever
method we're going to to go after, ultimately,
they they need to tell us it's an
explicit
US government policy to commit mass murder and
genocide.
Or,
these were rogue actors.
These people, Robert Kodlak,
Peter Marks
Hired by Donald Trump.
You know,
Fauci, whoever.
You know, these specific individuals,
they were rogue actors and acting outside of
their authority.
Right. So at that now now remember, now
this is then. Okay? Today, we've now had
multiple deals with Pfizer. We've had the continuation
of the COVID nineteen mRNA shot from Pfizer.
We've had the continual direction of the self
amplifying shots, the tri amplifying shots, all of
that.
How do you make sense of that?
Now point rightly so, some of the chat
points out, like, why we only seem to
to focus on Pfizer or some people do.
Now that's not necessarily the case. This one
point does hyperfocus on Pfizer for obvious reasons.
It's Ventavia, which was their, trial.
But it's right to point out that Moderna
is a very huge part of this conversation
that I do argue gets less attention than
Pfizer. Moderna,
I think, is the more important element of
the background
research to this point.
Right? But except to the point that Moderna,
this was, like, their first viable product. But
I think that the background up until now,
just from what I see seems to be
more prevalent, but overall, probably a lot more
going on that I can see you that
I maybe haven't I missed. But I think
my point is that Bob Langer here, the
article, the
scientific cofounder of Moderna, was also,
the the to overlap it with Charles Lieber's
work, both of which are a very important
part of the technology, I think, is around
the base of this that's going beyond the
COVID shots. My point is that that's a
huge part of all this. Pfizer was arguably
the focal point when it came to the
shots. Largely is real and overlap, I think,
in the way that Pfizer became the focal
point of the shots that they were given,
but it was all the technology. Right? It's
important to think about, but I'll include this
here.
And then, obviously, you know, the last part.
Just
Trump side with Pfizer after this conversation, by
the way.
Now
on Twitter, apparently, they're censoring conversations around this
as points
out. They posted this,
and they got an age restriction and adult
content.
Seriously.
They posted it he they write, Twitter quickly
suppressed the post about doctor Oz promoting the
mRNA shots in 2020 and 2021
and his role in the $70,000,000,000
Pfizer deal, marking it as, quote, age restricted
adult content that, quote, might not be appropriate
for people 18. Seriously?
That's credit that's crazy.
So this is three minutes, but
you can this is the the post in
general.
Yesterday's press conference announcing Trump's $70,000,000,000
deal
as you were the mastermind of everything. And
without the brilliant way that you designed the
whole thing, we wouldn't be able to make
it happen. Yeah. Great. Thanks, Trump, for the
deadly shots. But the point is, as always,
suppressing content around this conversation
still to this day. The Pfizer COVID nineteen
vaccine conversation. Most Most people pretend like that's
not happening on this platform still.
Brooke Jackson's interview, we just had on the
on May. Same old, same old.
Now Rob Schneider came out as well. Here's
mister Sausage posting this out on September 30
after that discussion. These are the released Pfizer
documents with the thousands,
thousands of side effects that they desperately tried
to have sealed from you for seventy five
years. I mean, this is like your the
point about the stuff we discussed in the
beginning. Can you even imagine that we're still
pretending some people that them deliberately trying publicly
to suppress
for seventy five years
thousands of side effects, what like, we don't
then now know exactly what that means?
Are we still like they're not they're not
pretending like there was some different reason for
it? No. Seventy five years. In what world
does it ever make sense? Let alone all
of the things they pretend weren't actually happening.
Everyone sees this other than the control structure,
just like Zionism,
just like the two party illusion. Guys, people
see this stuff. We're, like, cascading through these
constant lies because they force you back into
it with everything that happens.
It's a long list.
Rob Schneider sees it. It's my point, guys.
Think about how many people are calling this
out right now. President Trump, he said, fumbled
bigly giving $70,000,000,000
to the criminal enterprise known as Pfizer.
Now for policy,
this is just interesting to me.
Rob Lee says The US will provide this
is the Wall Street Journal's right here. US
to provide Ukraine with intelligence for missile strikes
deep inside of Russia. Right? Because
that's the end of the war. That's you
facilitating the end of this. By By the
way, that's always what's been going on. Hasn't
stopped. Narratives were shifting. That's the same thing
that's been going on from Biden to Trump.
The same thing. As Russia will tell you,
but who cares about the narrative? Let's all
pretend like he's saving the world, hashtag winning.
This
is the continuation of the agenda like we
told you would happen. I didn't know for
sure. I'm not psychic. I just said based
on the reality of the lie of the
two party illusion, the fact that both sides
have this interest, I bet you that doesn't
stop. Same with Israel. Despite all the screaming
of all the partisans that told you we
were blackbilled, and here we are.
Is this World War three, Alex Jones? Probably
like it is every other day he has
a story like this, but the problem is
that this isn't new. So as Russia stands
up and goes, we might have a response,
everybody clutches their pearls and goes, oh, war
three is coming. Certainly could. That would be
The US is driving this, but that's not
what that typically means. As Russia's always saying,
we have a right to respond and usually
does so in a way that's not belligerent.
And that's not to say that they're not.
Maybe that's just the way they're acting to
make sure you think that the point is
it is the way they're acting, regardless of
how you want that intent to shine over.
So when they go to the United Nations
or whatever else or demonstrate, the point is
that they continue to drive this and it
gets called World War three for the interest
of the power structures, probably Russia too.
And it simply highlights the fact that The
US will provide Ukraine with intelligence for long
range missile strikes on Russia, energy infrastructure, American
officials said. As the Trump administration weighs sending
Kyiv powerful weapons that could put in range
more targets in Russia, president Trump recently signed
off on allowing this to happen. Right. And
I said, is this what looks like to
end the war on day one? Alex Jones
asked me to ask for you guys.
Obviously, I'm kidding. Funny how someone down here
genuinely thought that I Alex asked me to
ask this. My point was clearly, he's the
one that said it was over, what, three
months ago and ever and more than one
since then?
Clearly not.
Worth reflecting on things like that.
Now Venezuela.
This is from,
I believe this was today, or at the
very least reporting about it happening yesterday.
US strikes another boat off Venezuelan coast.
We've got we've there's been zero evidence presented
at this point.
At this moment, why in the world? I
mean, how do we not have some kind
of U international entity here? This is against
the law in international sense. Nobody has the
they don't have the legal reality to execute
people in the middle of the international in
the in international law, in the middle of
the ocean, maritime law. They don't have the
legal reality to make those decisions in the
middle of the ocean. They do and they
always have. But to do it so publicly,
repeatedly, and make the case that we can
just execute you?
If okay. If this was, let's say, in
in in The US waters,
I would of course, we would argue regardless
of whether they're an American or not, if
you actually understand the constitution, that everybody has
due process.
The reality, though, is the international waters. I
mean, you could argue they can get away
with it easier in that regard. Right? They
were coming at the o the shore, and
they were gonna do something bad. People would
exhort it'd be easier to take because they
have the legal reality to make those decisions
even though I would still argue it would
be against the
law. To do so in the middle of
the ocean,
in what world does that make sense to
anybody? If China was popping off American ships
because they claimed they were doing something without
proving it, what do you think the United
States government would do? If it was anybody
other than Israel doing it, seeing as they
do that all the time in Palestine,
they would make a huge deal about it.
So what does that show you? They're trying
to create that same kind of allowance that
we can do whatever we want, whenever we
want, wherever we want because
we are the good guys.
Even though it couldn't be farther from the
truth in regard to what they do. Not
that they're the counterbalance to some other bad.
I believe there are probably other people doing
better than them, but the reality is regardless
of the other,
what they're doing is bad. They're breaking the
law. They're murdering people for no justification. They're
acting in things that are against the American
interest, but, you know, so what do you
call that? This is a crime. And all
they're making clear is they're gonna keep doing
it, and they claim it's a war. That's
what this is now, a war.
US military carried out another strike on a
boat operating in The Caribbean of in the
Caribbean officials deemed to be a narco trafficking
vessel,
and this is this was on Friday, so
this was today.
Secretary of defense Pete Hegseth announced this on
a social media post because apparently that's the
way everything happens now. The so the strike
killed all four people who were on board.
And no witnesses. Now we don't know for
sure. Right? The attack marks at least the
fourth known
US Military Strike in The Caribbean since the
September.
I mean, in any other context, out them
outside of them building this narrative, which I'll
make clear in a second,
wouldn't you normally do something different? Go to
the, you know, the country and and say,
hey. This is a problem. Would you would
you join? But they'll know Venezuela is the
bad guy. Therefore, we have no they're creating
the construct. Even if you think that's the
case,
and they're just executing people with no justification,
with no verification.
The attack marks the fourth
that they've,
beginning in September that they've attacked
targeting the boats of, the
administration claims they're affiliated with drug cartels that
The US has designated terrorist organizations. See how
see how abstract so we decide that's a
terrorist organization when it's not by every verifiable
point. It's a gang. Sure. And the prove
whether they're provably
controlling the Venezuelan government is so childishly
anything's possible.
Is there any evidence to back that up?
And if you could you know, the evidence
that we're required to prove that they're running
the Venezuelan government and the idea that they
should very much prove that? Some at some
point, this is going to kick into international
reaction, some legal action in this country. And
just like every other case, what are they
gonna say? National security.
They'll never have to prove any of this
despite the fact that they're legally required to.
And so that they're going terrorist organization. Right?
So we we did that. They're terrorists now.
Now when anybody else does anything in this
area, we'll claim that's the group that's doing
it. Therefore, now we can do whatever we
want, and nobody can ask us to prove
anything even though they're required to.
It's like the broken logic they have about
the I mean, don't you recognize how all
these things intersect? They're just using the excuse
they have. Oh, invasion invasion from the southern
border. It's all turned to Iraq because, you
know and and and Venezuela as a state
actor, and Biden allowed that, so he's working
with them even though it was a long
term slow immigration point.
But that seems so clumsy. It didn't make
any sense. And now they're going, oh, now
we got it. Now we're gonna claim that
they're running the Venezuelan government, therefore it all
ties together. It only took them four months
to work that out. It's just like it's
just like Israel. They lie and they lie
and eventually they go, what about if we
connect these two and we lie about that?
We shine the light on it. Now now
do you buy it? Like, we didn't watch
you do that for four months. Anyway, it
says, Hengseth posted on Twitter on Friday that
the president Trump president Trump ordered
that act that he ordered this. That's important.
He directed the lethal kinetic strike on a
narco trafficking vessel affiliated with designated terrorist organizations.
They didn't say Kennedy or Robert, mind you.
That's what they're pointing to in the laws
of justification. But when they actually state what
they did, they only say designated terrorist organization
because that's the legal, you know, DTO. Like,
they use that in a lot of this
conversation. The attack took place in international waters
just off Venezuela's coast, which means they don't
have jurisdiction. The mo the move that could
further inflame tensions between The US and Venezuela
and the point is that now this is
becoming something they're going to act upon like
any country would.
Maduro said on on Tuesday that he's preparing
to declare a state of emergency
to protect his country in the event of
an attack by the US military.
I hate to say it's emergency in any
context, but the point is you understand why
that logic like, if they're not trafficking drugs
and it's not them running the Venezuelan government,
then you understand why any government, any country
would be like, okay. You just killed four
people full of boats and we have to
or boats full of people, and we have
to do something about that.
So they're acting. But, again, consider that maybe
what they're saying is true. But you should
absolutely
demand that they present evidence to make their
case, which they, I bet you my life,
they never will.
Hegset did not say which terrorist organization the
boat was allegedly affiliated with, but added that
our intelligence,
without a doubt, confirmed that this vessel was
trafficking narcotics. The people on board were narcoterrorists,
and they were operating as a no narcotrafficking
transit route.
So they were in the ocean, and we
don't like Venezuela, so we bombed them. Everything
else fits together.
The the the real clear thing here, guys,
our intelligence,
without a doubt, you mean except for the
other 75 times in the last six months
that your intelligence turned out to be false?
Or go back to Bolton and Olympic minds.
Go back to the claims about Iran that
we just watched. I mean, do you realize
how often they keep saying our intel they're
wrong. Or or it's not they're wrong. Let's
be clear. They're deliberately miss they're they're lying
to you just like this.
Because the point is, let's just say that
even this was accidents.
I don't think it's. I think it's very
deliberate, but let's just say it was. Well,
they're gonna go, well, they were terrorists. They
need you to sell that narrative because that's
what stops it for being a crime. Right?
So our intelligence says, national security.
I mean, they know how this works, guys.
They've been doing it for decades now. And
says the administration
oh, it says, Hegseth did not say which
group, but it goes on to say he
alleged the boat was transporting substantial amounts of
narcotics
headed to The to America to poison our
people. Now this may not,
you know,
connect for some people, but those that have
been doing this long enough and recognize how
completely immersed our government is with drug trafficking,
and I mean more than one intelligence organization,
or even just the government itself, like like
the White House executive branch or whatever, that
they wouldn't recognize an opportunity to take that,
it's valuable. You understand? They would take it.
In every other case you could find, they
don't dispose of these things. They take it.
They use it. You may not think so.
Why? It's not my point. People, that's not
true.
Do your due diligence. And the idea that
they would not try to successfully seize those
things, I find hard to believe, which suggests
to me that that's not what's happening on
top of 50 other points.
Headed to the and this is why they
said this, by the way, headed to America
to poison our people. That's what they're using
to argue defense at first until now they
just went the other direction. Even though they
don't stop and think that that challenges their
original narrative, they're not that smart, apparently. The
administration has previously argued that other boats, if
struck, were also headed to The United States,
necessitating urgent military action.
You see, no one's ever tried to argue
that the delivery of drugs was the immediate
wartime act. That's why they said people are
dying drugs all over the place. Therefore, it's
an imminent
emergency. I mean, it's just embarrassing. It's insulting
to your intelligence that they have to execute
these overlapping patches and emergencies
to force in something that doesn't connect without
those points.
Do you feel it's an emergency military threat?
People that are allegedly, without proving it, delivering
drugs, maybe to The United States? We need
to realize how insane that is. Even if
it was, that doesn't give them the right
to bomb these people. But overall, I think
they're making this up.
We're you know, it's it's the national defense
or rather even more likely the Bethlehem doctrine.
Like, we're the self the preemptive self defense.
It's the Israel, UK, US broken logic.
Legal experts and lawmakers
oh, excuse me. It says the administration has
previously argued that other boats that it struck
were also ahead of The United States. It
says, however, at least one boat struck by
The US, the first one we talked about,
was already turning around. You see? So this
already blew up in their face.
They were already turning around. So, legally, there's
no way that it was an imminent threat.
They were going back the other direction, and
you killed them before they can get away.
But they still argued it. They still said
defense. Right? Legal experts and lawmakers on both
sides of the aisle have questioned the legality
of the strikes. The Pentagon said Trump had
determined that The US is in an armed
conflict
with the drug cartels.
So there this is what's interesting. You're now
arguing that the cartels, not even Trond de
Aragua, not even Venezuela, but the cartels, a
broader claim. The war on terror, war on
drugs mashed together. Right? Kind of always was.
Over
here, you're now arguing
that you're at war.
Right? So congress doesn't decl never declared anything.
And that is the legal reality here. But
see, they're trying to act like we're as
an imminent threat. But so now you're defending
yourself? Well, no. You can't argue that with
what's happening anymore. So they had to shift
it into an actual war. So we're we're
being attacked in general. We have to go
after them now.
With a cartel or the cartels? See, this
is what's interesting. From a legal perspective, I
don't think you can even declare war on
a non state actor.
You know, in a broad, like, war on
drugs, for example, but that's not like a,
you know, reality of the league, like, an
actual kinetic warfare point. I we're gonna talk
about this more on Monday. But it says
describing The US military strikes as part of
an armed conflict suggests
that the attacks are part of a longer
term campaign and not just a one off
and strikes upset in self defense.
See, they're just they're they're they're they're showing
their hand. They're proving their false logic from
before and just shoving it into the next
argument.
Too late. We're past it now. You can't
get me for that one. We're on this
one. You know? It's it's like we're in
kindergarten.
In this post on Twitter, he just said,
these strikes will continue until the attacks on
the American people are over. The attacks?
He's an armed conflict with drug cartels as
they have designated
as terrorist organizations.
See, the anybody they wanna use that just
like the see, what they're doing is they're
taking the same agenda that anybody there, like,
any ISIS they pretender there. Now they're going
after them because ISIS or war on terror,
and they're just being clumsy with it. Because
these aren't the junior team, I think. All
of them. Overall, you're just jamming it into
the next conversation. Right? Now we are at
war with terrorists and drug cartels and smugglers,
unlawful combatants is what they're calling it.
So the peace president. Right?
Well, as we showed you before, the US
Navy has now killed what? Now it's twenty,
twenty one in deadly strikes. Venezuela is giving
guns to civilians.
And what is The US gonna do? See,
they're arming them. They're all terrorists because that's
smart thing to say after you were killing
innocent people in boats or at the very
least, anybody, killing drug traffickers in boats that
were not your legal reality on the coast
of Venezuela. What do you think The US
would do even if they were actually, you
know, a mayor what if, you know, any
context you wanna add there to make a
drug overlap? They would be freaking out about
Venezuela being present in the first place.
This will be used to claim their terrorism
even though the terrorists are the ones killing
people in boats.
Now interestingly,
surprise surprise, I know you're shocked to find
out this lazy eyed sociopath, Stephen Miller, is
taking a leading role in the strikes on
Venezuela. Why? Because this is another Israeli agenda,
in my opinion.
Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of
staff, has played a leading role in directing
US strikes against suspected Venezuelan drug boats. Suspected.
According to three people familiar with the situation,
at times, his role has superseded
that of Marco Rubio,
the secretary of state and national security adviser,
because that makes sense. Right? This random appointee,
Stephen Miller,
he is the one who's superseding the the
secretary of state?
Even a blindly ad like, ardent supporter of
Israel
that that Rubio is,
I think you need to start asking yourself
what's really happening here, guys. I mean, there
this this guy is a of all of
them, he is a die hard Israel first
Zionist.
To strike some Venezuelan boats allegedly carrying narcotics,
which the administration has claimed were necessary because
interdiction
did not work. Is that how that normally
works though? Right? You know, that like, what
if this country, they just say, well, we
can't we tried to intervene with children on
drugs. Just get rid of them. Sephora them.
Kill them all because interdiction doesn't work.
Right? I mean, obviously, the term is a
little bit different in this context
as we're saying where was it?
So this would the action of prohibiting, forbidding.
Right? Well, I mean, you could also take
in the meaning being, like, intervention. You know?
But the point is that so trying to
stop it from happening is not working, so
kill them.
Yeah. That's very Trump logic, a very US
government logic rather.
But he says, have they been orchestrated through
the Homeland Security Council, the HSC,
which Miller leads as a Homeland Security adviser?
Right. So the adviser to this council is
now superseding the secretary of state.
Yeah. No big deal there.
Miller empowered the HSC earlier this year to
become its own entity in Trump's second term.
Yeah. Nothing weird about this Israel Israel led
kind of group overtaking the secretary of state,
a notable departure from previous administrations where it
was considered part of the National Security Council
and ultimately reported to the National Security Advisor,
otherwise known as Marco Rubio.
Right? So in that and now so what
just if this is confusing,
a situation or a sit a a,
position
that it otherwise reported directly to Marco Rubio
was now seemingly telling Marco Rubio what to
do, at least according to this situation. And
I argue,
if you stand back and look at the
things he's involved with, he seems to be
making a lot more decisions than
a person in his position should. Miller's role
also opens a window into the dubious legal
justification that has been advanced for the strikes,
which has been a matter of deep controversy
amid allegations, it amounted to extrajudicial murder. I
mean, guys, this is not allocation. That's exactly
what this was. Regardless of what you claimed,
there was no process. There was no investigation.
They just executed all of them. So let's
just say they were carrying drugs. What if
they were what if they had his son
with him? What if it wasn't drugs? What
if it was medicine that was looking like
you you could argue a thousand different possibilities.
You know what I think? I don't think
they care. If you want my art, my
gut opinion, they're killing innocent people just to
make a narrative. That's the kind of people
we're dealing with. If you don't think that's
possible, I don't think you're paying attention today.
Since the start of the Venezuelan campaign, White
House officials have sought to justify the strikes
internally
and externally by claiming Trump was exercising the
article two powers, which allows the president to
use no incorrect, by the way. Before you
can finish the sentence, incorrect,
in self defense, in limited engagements.
The point is that if you're talking about
in the con in the country, if you're
talking not some foreign base, this is a
bastardization
of what these things mean. If there was
an invasion in this country,
then that would be the reality.
That everything else represents empire, not the reality
of the republic it originally was supposed to
be.
But, he says, which allows the president to
use military force in self defense.
The self defense argument, of course, revolves around
Trump's designation that they were terrorist organization, Trende
Aragua,
a claim advanced by Miller, of course, in
order to to defend the deportation of dozens
of Venezuelans earlier this year under a totally
different thing, the Alien Enemies Act.
Right? So now they're just kinda patching these
things together.
The reality of that was still against the
law because they still were afforded due process
regardless of where they were from.
The administration claimed that Trende Aragua had infiltrated
the regime of Venezuela president Nicolas
Maduro, And so the presence of the cartel's
members in The US amounted to a predatory
incursion by a foreign nation allowing for the
deportation of Venezuelan nationals. Right? Of course, the
problem was that none of that made any
sense and you couldn't prove that. On top
of the fact that Maduro was already willing
to work with you guys and you pretend
that he wasn't, and that was that came
out proven.
But it says it's a drug cartel that
is running Venezuela, Miller told reporters. You know,
decide aside from all the very ridiculous, like,
cartoonish level lies he puts out, like, we
won a seven to zero Supreme Court ruling
that was literally zero to seven.
It's just embarrassing, guys. And people they it's
only the the blind followers that go along
with people like this. But he knows that,
and he's laughing at you when he does
it. You're the one being used by him
as much as you pretend you're on the
same team.
White house earlier this month said as he
characterized Maduro as the head of the cartel.
It's not a government. It's a drug cartel.
Narco trafficking organization is running Venezuela. Sure. It's
nice and fun to just lay out these
kind of claims. You can prove any of
that. No. They never do.
As as well as the point I make
every time. How about you take a quick
glance over at Columbia, which traffics the majority
of cocaine in the world, but you don't
care about that because they're an ally? Or
use the country next to them to facilitate
that, and they're also one of The US
ally. But over here, even if there is
drug trafficking, it's a fraction of a fraction
of what happens over here. But see, it's
not about the drugs, guys. It's either about
the long term agenda of Venezuela for any
number of reasons politically,
hatred probably, but also lithium and gold and
all the other things they want, oil.
But it says the administration has yet to
provide concrete evidence. Shocker. A divided three judge
panel at the US Court of Appeals for
the fifth circuit on September 2 ruled that
deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, the same
one that used the
Trende Nicaragua claim, were unlawful.
Unlawful.
Because the administration had not met the high
burden of,
wait for it, showing Trende Nicaragua was in
fact an arm of the Maduro regime. So
they've lost in court more than once for
that claim, and now they're just using it
again. See, this is the whole ignore the
courts, double down, lie, lie, lie. This is
the Marc Andreessen,
Carteel,
Curtis Yarvin sort of, like, oligarchs winning against
the bad oligarchs,
Machiavellian mindset that they're pushing on everybody.
And it is clearly absorbed into this cabinet
without question. The reality, guys, they know that
it's already been challenged and already been put
down. They're using it right in front of
you. They're claiming it's a Venezuela is just
a turn to a rogue actor, and that's
invading our country,
and the drugs they're trafficking
will be a threat if they're going to
our country, which we can't I mean, it
just becomes ridiculous.
Overall,
they lied about this. We can prove that,
and they're just lying about it again now.
As well and this is just the the
report. US is engaging in a formal armed
conflict
with terrorist drug cartels.
Just skip that for time. That's the same
point.
Now, a quick overlap, which I do wanna
do quickly in regard to immigration.
Just kinda showing you that I mean, keep
that point in mind of the trend to
Iraq overlap and the lie therein. First of
all, just in case we forgot this, another
Supreme Court ruling, by the way, or just
a federal court ruled, which we shouldn't need
to rule again and again and again because
it is reality of the constitution.
They ruled that noncitizens
lawfully present in The United States and by
the way, even unlawfully,
just in case we don't understand that by
now,
actually have the same free speech rights as
the rest of the citizens. Meaning, you can't
deport people because based
on First Amendment protected speech,
such as criticizing Israel.
But let's be clear again, guys.
Regardless of what this ruling even said, except
that people down below are, like, picking in
this response or picking apart, like, look what
the judge wrote. It doesn't it's irrelevant. It's
not based on this ruling. The reality of
it, you can go back to every Supreme
Court ruling before it. You can go back
to reading the constitution for yourself and understanding
the idea of what an inherent god given
right is and the idea of a republic
that's created to instill those values in the
world. But we can only enforce this idea
in these boundaries, which is that people have
inherent god given rights.
Whether or not they're here illegally, it's just
so frustrating that we have to keep talking
about this. I always will, though, because it's
important. So my my point is even additionally,
it's not just here legally. It's anybody.
Now, again, within the illegal part, I've I've
said every time, there are a few exceptions
to certain things, but due process is not
one of them. So the reality is as
as anyone cared to look and the facts
they already knew, we've been telling you guys
from day one. Take note of the free
fake free speech warriors out there trying to
convince you that people even people here legally
somehow don't have constitutional rights because they're not
born here. It's so gross that those kind
of people who act like they're the most
American out there are the least informed about
their own country and their own rights.
Funny enough, somebody commented right beneath this going,
you're so dumb. That's not true. And I
said, my god. Your lack of constitutional literacy
is astounding. And he probably went and looked
it up for himself and deleted his post.
Instead of going, hey, man. I'm sorry. You
were right, and that's crazy. I should've looked
at of course not. Not how the partisan
game works today.
Trump from Vanity Fair,
August, but important to highlight. This is from
a while ago, though, 02/2019.
Report, Trump happily employing undocumented workers while ICE
rounds them up.
Nothing new. Same thing today as he already
let out as we got to this part
two of his second administration. Just thinking about
this, guys. Think about how insulting this is.
And terrifying moment when ICE agents hold family
at gunpoint and smash their car window with
a baby inside. Now this is a frustrating
point, the whole thing about it. The reality
of it, to do it quick, is that
the guy was here illegally. Now he was
going through the process
and just showed up for one of these
court hearings in regard to leaving the country.
And by all accounts, in court, even the
court, he was participating.
For whatever reason, they bum rushed his car
outside of the court after he just went
in and left
and demanded he get out of the car
without a warrant, without information, and then bust
the window in, put the baby at risk
in the car. All of it was unnecessary.
Now that's not to say he wasn't here
legally. The point was even the court will
attest to the fact that he was participating
in the process of removing him. They didn't
need like, they could have come and and
knocked on his door and been like, hey.
We're here to expedite that. Different situation instead
of bum rushing him. And by the way,
without a warrant, without identifying yourselves, all of
those are against the law, period.
It's amazing we even debate these things today.
And the reality is that they put these
people at risk.
Hurt people in the process, American citizens. They
do it every single time.
Apple, of course, removed their ICE tracking app
after Trump administration said they threatened officers. And
this is what's so frustrating. Do you realize?
Like and look. Let's just even say fine.
Remove the app of somehow tracking them in
their current location even though I don't know
they don't they identify themselves with uniforms
and sirens and yeah. But how dare we
know where they are? Like, it just doesn't
make any sense to me. But fine. Let's
just even say you think that that's dangerous
for them, even though a job is dangerous
and that's the point.
The idea that we are that they're legally
required to identify themselves,
their name, their badge number, and always providing
the justification for why they're doing what they're
doing, warrants and so on, None of them
are doing this right now. And crazy enough,
people like Noem and Bondi and Trump and
Heggs, all of them are acting like that
doesn't matter because Democrats.
They're either that small minded and stupid or
and uninformed of their own country, or they're
using that to lie to people that are.
It's insane. And the reality is they're breaking
the law every day they're doing this. And
they're giving people justification legally to be able
to be like, I'm not complying until I
know what's going on. Maybe you're a rapist
in a police vest, which has already happened
by the way. And the fact that you're
not proving this to me, I'm going to
drive away. And they opened fire. It's happened
twice now.
This is so far outside the realm of
what anybody would expect in this country. You
go back if you went back before Trump
Trump's last administration,
you realize what they would have said about
this? Like, if the if it was happening
under Biden's administration, can you imagine what the
Democrat Republicans
would say about what they're doing to their
families? Anyway, the the bottom line is they
removed the app
under the guise that they're being threatened. The
point is that their narrative for that is
that Democrats are attacking them all over, even
though you can prove, if you care to
look, that it's basically been a low point
for that conversation.
It's not even true. The number, the thousand
percent increase, all of it stems back to
Tom Homan's claim on that par program. I've
shown you this twice now.
Right?
His his mumbling answer apparently is the only
thing we get.
Freedom.
Oh, okay. On top of that, a journalist
who was trying to film them, of course,
you can't do that. Your party is at
risk, gets hurt, tackled, and has severe injuries.
Hospitalized after simply trying to photograph while they
were doing this. What, technically, it was in
an elevator they was trying to join, they
literally threw him down.
I mean, what what democrat. Right? Or whatever
your nonsensical argument is, this is a crime
in and of itself. On top of that,
these are agents working for you and using
your tax dollars, and this is what they're
doing to journalists.
Very Gaza esque at this point. I should,
you know, I shouldn't even say that because
what they're dealing with is a nightmare on
top of a nightmare. This is a, you
know, a benign situation. Or I just my
point is that you can get the normalization
of that kind of violence or just any
kind of violence against
anybody for that matter. That's where this is
going. In no way to belittle the reality
of what they're dealing with. On top of
that, another ruling that you might have seen,
Trump targeting a pro Palestinian campus activist
for deportation,
unlawful, another judge finds. Now just before we
get into the game, these have been Republican
and Democrat judges despite Miller screeching about a
judicial coup and radical left activists. These are
Republican and Democrat judges on all
the multiple cases going back from the beginning,
and they just ignore the Republican ones, including
the Supreme Court, by the way. What this
is saying, I'll include it, read it for
yourself, is that they have now deemed what
we were saying accurate. And we already knew
this. They were using unlawful actions to remove
people who were legally in this country. And
it's the same thing. It's the whole overlap
with the trend in Arago point, not the
same story. My point is the whole conversation
is built on lies.
And guess what? They're still doing it.
Now this one blew me away, actually, but
I I shouldn't say that because I expected.
It's funny how they're screaming about political politically
driven judges, then you get an action like
this. Judge upholds final deportation order for
Garcia. Of course, Breitbart even. Well, I you
know, I will give them credit. At least
they say alleged because you can quite literally
prove these aren't true. MS 13 gangbanger.
They have proven in court this isn't true.
You know how you know that even more?
Because if you read what they actually did
in court, they don't even argue that anymore.
All they're trying to argue now is that
he's not in danger to go back to
El Salvador. And I don't I can't even
tell if that means the torture prison or
just sending him there. Don't forget, it was
Trump's administration in 02/2019, I believe, that allowed
him to stay under the threat that or
the the claim he was in danger. That
was Trump's administration.
And then they allowed and they gave him
the withholding of removal, and that's why he
was still here and Trump go, oh my
god, Tara. They make up the whole fake
story about it. The reality though
is that to quickly go over this this
whole section and get take a long time
to go over. I'll I'm gonna revisit this
in another show, all of it, is that
what we're talking about here
is that they're ultimately deeming him not a
threat to be sent back to El Salvador,
therefore saying, okay. Now we can send him
back. And that's the only thing being discussed.
And understand my point is that in these
proceedings,
what, three times, if not four, the judges
have laughed, thrown out, said claims that I've
I've never even heard judges speak like,
saying that these things were lies. The human
trafficking that they almost they manufactured a thing
that's literally impossible, or the fact that all
the claims about gang members, all of it's
based on hyper hyperbole,
provenly false claims, people that were fired for
for corruption. I mean and the bottom line
is regardless of any of that, there's no
evidence. It's all hearsay.
And yet here's the Homeland Security post. After
all they get is the ruling that he's
allowed to go back to El Salvador, which,
by the way, was never even really disputed
that he was eventually going to be deported.
It was the withholding of removal that Trump's
administration gave him because he was at risk
of being hurt in El Salvador. Right? That
was the only point. And so all they're
saying is, well, it's not in he's not
in danger anymore, regardless what you think about
that, and saying, okay. Send him back then.
And the the they're disputing, you know, that's
the wrong place or maybe just to keep
him here because he's got family here now.
But either way,
now they're just sending it. They're claiming that
that's going to happen now. And they say,
with today's ruling,
Kimora Brager Garcia's final order of removal stands.
Okay.
That we can agree on. That's it. They
say, this MF thirteen gang member, human trafficking,
domestic abuser, child predator will never be loose
on America again. Child predator?
You know what they're saying? They're literally using
a false height a claim of his son
that was going with them in the car
while they were driving people to work.
It's just they're just so shockingly dishonest. Or
the human trafficker claim
because they he was working with other people
in the car that were being brought to
the place he worked at. You could prove
this.
But they claim because they brought people across
the state line, that's human trafficking. They're deliberately
misinforming you knowing what those things mean. Or
MS 13, which has been laughed out of
court.
Trump saying he's got tattoos that he literally
does not.
I mean, it's it's just outrageous where we
are, but these people still push this stuff.
I was watching what's that guy, the misfit
patriot, one of the dumbest people on the
Internet out there pushing back on claims like
this in, what's this, the Timcast discussion.
It's just it's insane to look at the
false the false certainty that people have about
things that you can quite literally prove using
their very court documents presented by Trump's administration
that they don't know what they're talking about.
But even this, even this, no matter how
much we've done, people will still go, oh,
you're just a Democrat, whatever.
Blind, blind ignorance.
But if you wanna go back to the
very first show we did on April 22,
I include
every one of these court documents that prove
that these alone, there's more that's come out
since then. These alone will prove to you
if you watch the show and go through
and read them for yourself that they're lying
to you. It's elementary, guys. But here we
are.
It's just incredible.
So, Glenn, on top of some of this,
he adds or the the this Friar, count
reports, breaking today, a federal district court in
Massachusetts issued a ruling rebuking
ruling rebuking of Trump administration's attempts to deport
lawfully present noncitizens for protected pro Palestinian speech.
As the court explained, we are not and
we must not become a nation that imprisons
and deports people because we are afraid of
what they might have to tell us.
Good. I'm so I mean, it's just, like,
amazing we even have to say this out
loud.
And Glenn says, I've read countless first amendment
judicial rulings in my life, but I've never
read one as scathing as this decision by
Reagan appoint a Reagan appointed federal judge, judge
William Young, on Trump and Rubio's, quote, full
throated assault on free speech
by punishing
Israel critics with immigration law. See, this is
when we get to the Israel part, guys.
That's why this is so relevant. That's what's
driving this.
Is that America first? The court's finding that
Trump, Rubio, and Kristi Noem have been aggressively
assaulting core free speech.
Core free speech rights for Israel isn't confined
to things like deporting students for op eds
about Israel. The court says they use antisemitism
as an excuse to suppress speech in general.
There you go. Now it's not because the
judge says it. It's because it's patently obvious.
It's objective.
They're just finally, people are starting to call
this out.
Here,
Glenn points another ruling. This one says 300
students are being barred from registering for courses
at Northwestern University because they refuse to take
antisemitism courses. That's America first, apparently. One of
the fur and by the way, regardless of
whether it's been antisemitism, it's being pushed by
Israel for the way that they use that
conversation.
And in any case, the point is the
idea that you're saying the what you know,
even if it's racism, you're allowed to think
what you want. In what world are we
arguing that that's what the right would make
fun about the left? Right? They're right now
saying racism isn't even a real thing because
that's how that's how inverted it's all gotten.
It does exist. The point, though, is that
you have this happening, and they're literally using
that to manipulate speech while claiming that the
left it's just it's so completely broken. I
think both sides have a complete inability at
the team sport level to self reflect.
This is one of the worst free speech
attacks in Trump admin's imposition of expanded campus
hate speech codes
is the excuse me. One of the worst
speech
free speech attacks is Trump's imposition
of expanded campus hate speech code that punish
American students and faculty for Israel views.
He uses the whole funding element, which by
the way, in and of itself is a
problem, federal funding in general. But that's it
hasn't changed the reality. Just like the FCC
point with Carr, you pressured it. It happened.
It's it's the Supreme Court's ruled in this
many times. You're responsible. It's a free speech
issue. Northwestern students are barred from registering if
they refuse. ADL's created pro Israel propaganda course.
Remember that before we get to the ADL
point. You know, the the very bombastic lie
that the FBI in any way broke apart
with the ADL?
One last point.
ICE arrested a US citizen twice during Alabama
construction site raids. Now he's suing them. Right?
Twice. See, what this needs to prove to
you is that he's there with brown skin,
and they grabbed him. They did it twice
because they're not there's not warrants. They're not
doing anything other than profiling and scooping people
up, many of which get caught in the
mix like we saw in the beginning. The
vast majority of people sent to Venezuela El
Salvador were people that were not criminals, most
of which were here legally.
Most I I there most of them are
still in El Salvador, guys. Think how crazy
that is.
So this is an American citizen, not not
this is an American citizen with his ID
right in front of you, and he has
been arrested twice for the same thing because
they're not doing their job. They're just grabbing
people that are brown.
And so I guess for some people, that
doesn't seem to matter. I think that speaks
for itself. But for those of us that
care about constitutional rights,
that actually America first, this should matter.
Now two quick points on Epstein.
In case you'd missed the whole overlap of
the shutdown,
Mike Johnson shuts down the White House or
the excuse me. Shuts down the house until
September
to block voting on the Epstein files. Now
he did basically say that, but But the
over up you could argue it's for plenty
of other things. They're blaming the Democrats. I
think that's why they wanna frame it that
way. So it's not so it it feels
like it's they don't want Republicans going,
did the Republicans just shut down the government
to hide the Epstein files? You know? But
it would be both of them if you
understand the real picture
here. Just one more point. Epstein survivor Juliet
Rose Bryan says, I've decided to join whistleblower,
Maria Farmer, in The US courts to hold
The US accountable for ignoring her 1996,
2,006 reports of Epstein crimes to the FBI.
Hear that, Kash Patel? Things that they're hiding
from. All Epstein survivors come and join me,
she says.
Now I don't know. You know, I'm not
in the
business of validating people's claim you know, in
that in that context. Like, if this came
to something that was being used to, like,
put people in prison, you know, and, like,
outside of a a dead Epstein, like, it's
worth us to, you know, make sure. At
this point, my point in simply saying this
is that she's making a case for how
she was abused. It's something we should consider
as all with all the rest of it.
The bottom line is it's okay to be
skeptical. Right? Don't but as like any other
conversation, I think decorum's important. I'm only saying
any of that because I think it's important
that we, in any like like like Israel
in the beginning of the rape allegations.
I get I've said this many times. The
amount of pushback we got for just going,
well, I'm gonna verify these things was so
incredible. And I get it. People get emotional,
but that's what we always have to do.
But I do agree this is important, that
people should be coming up, joining her, Maria,
talking about what they because these are things
that are being broadly ignored under the guys
that they're fighting for them.
Right? They're saying, I'm protecting people like her.
Why not? They're going, we'll release it. I
I'm I know. I mean, I want this
released, and they don't care. They're blocking FOIA
requests for these people.
This is just so shockingly corrupt. I and,
again, this is if you think about for
a second, if you're a nonpartisan or at
least not blindly team sport partisan, you look
at stuff like this and you go, yeah.
That's crazy. So that means somebody, probably all
of them in this current administration, just like
all of them in the other administration, are
doing this. What does that show you? There's
a problem here. Right? And so high and
but so people just blame themselves to this
issue and
high five about their team.
Now overlapping this with Israel, what you think
is very important.
Max Blumenthal had an important update. The New
York Times has corroborated his report, and I'll
show you both of them, that the ultra
Zionist billionaire, Robert Shillman,
canceled a major donation
to Turning Point USA just days before Charlie
Kirk's killing. So remember, the the overarching o
overarching
point of all this, and and it says
as in the past, the times did not
credit him with the work is is typical.
Oh, wait.
Hold on.
Oh, that's weird. I guess I've lost this
from from over there. This is about is
about the
that's about the about Venezuela. I don't know
how I did that. I guess I didn't
lose the highlight. Anyway,
the point here
is that he got, you know, funding clearly
from Zionists, from Israel.
And
he started having
a change of mind. As Candace, as Tucker,
as plenty of people have now very, very
clearly verified, despite all the screeching lies of
Zionists
as usual, he he was changing his opinion.
Now, who's to say to what degree and
how, but he was. It's very clear. He
was saying things about Israel he never really
pointed out before. And Candace Owens was saying
he was considering changing his faith. There's all
sorts of different points out there. And then
he got kind of a, you know, as
I've said, a come to Jesus meeting. You
know, probably the wrong term there, but that's
what I would use. Like, in not even
religious in context, meaning, like, you know,
you gotta come talk to us about this.
Right? We have to discuss where going forward,
like, what this is gonna be. Meaning that
they're upset with what he was doing. We
have to change that. Right? That's kinda what
the con that term can mean. And so
this was the first one. Charlie Kirk refused
Netanyahu funding offer and was frightened by pro
Israel forces before his death. Now they were
trying to say, you're doing the wrong things.
You're saying the wrong things. They invited him
to this weird meeting with bat Bill Ackman
where he felt like he was being pressured
and lied to. He was being threatened.
Right? And so the point was they then
offered him this huge amount of money he
turned down,
and they died. Now so the the the
point has always been that he has this
is verifiable.
He had the most influential position for the
most influential part of the demographic in The
United States around the battleground that is Israel
influence,
and they're losing.
And he started to change sides.
So whether you wanna do the math on
whether that makes sense, it does, but you
can decide whether or not you think it
happened. The government like that that's assassinated Americans
and others many, many, many times, whether they
would do that in order to shut down
the conversation and be able to claim forever
that he was your martyr.
It's worth considering at the very least. That's
the point. Question everything.
So this is simply reporting that they have
now New York Times has corroborated that, yes,
there was a major pull of funding,
right, because of what Carl Charlie Kirk was
doing. And let's not forget. Now, after he's
moved he moved so they they dropped the
funding after he didn't accept the new thing,
right? Then he dies. Ben Shapiro and his
team sort of step into running the campus
push and all that. His wife takes over
and boom, they get a massive amount of
new funding from Zymus.
That's exactly what happened. I mean, I don't
know how a a detective
would be that would be the focal point
of his investigation.
My lawyer points out something I thought was
interesting.
Now, I wasn't even gonna show you this
because I thought this was the the what
Max was sharing right there because I didn't
wanna get into the personal art. But I
found this actually interesting for a reason. Is
that ultimately, Max shares this. Candace knows this
is the man that funds Laura Loomer, by
the way. Keep in mind that Laura was
attacking Charlie just before he died, and she
now demands that we stop investigating Charlie's murder,
who was directing her to do that. And
she responded with this very long, weird post.
It's not even worth I mean, you could
read it, but I simply said,
the the lady doth protest too much of
me, thanks, which basically means that she's, you
know, giving way too many details, but it
suggests that she's hiding something or lying.
And she's but the point was, no, he
doesn't fund me. Okay. Who knows? Oh, Milo
does. And it says, she only absolutely funded
Laura. So I think that's I wasn't gonna
share it until I saw this because what's
relevant about this is not the back and
forth yelling, but that she's provably funded by
the Zionist, which she's been denying forever. And
I think that's very important to recognize.
I think we all know this, by the
way. And he says, I know her. I
know because
her grants were once paid through my organization.
We tried to teach her basic reporting skills.
In 2018,
Doctor. Bob, the guy, asked for a site
rep, sit rep.
He didn't share my staff's optimism about our
potential. He was right. We were wrong.
And gives you the data that shows you
that. There are screenshots. You can decide for
yourself.
Very interesting, though. My this is because the
next point we're gonna get into, by and
large, is the social media infiltration influence,
which is wild
right now. All this shows you is it
goes back a long way, that they have
been funding and manipulating people on this plat
or at any social media platform in this
country, news, media, government,
our entire lives.
Now, this is, you could read this. This
is Candace Owens
alleging federal government is lying about absolutely everything
involving Charlie Kirk.
Or,
I by the way, I added absolutely just
lying about everything involving Charlie Kirk assassin assassin
suspect, Tyler Robinson, and claims he never stepped
foot on Utah campus.
So she's I haven't been following her work
recently, but she has been and I not
really ever to be honest, but I was
consider I was interested in what she was
saying about this and
whether or not you know, I'm curious. I'm
gonna look at this more, like, what to
what degree. She's simply saying that they're making
all this up or lying rather about the
story, which I think I also agree as
last I checked on the story. I think
it's
pretty inconsistent.
My point on this in general though is,
you know, I'm oh, let me go to
this one first.
I'm not gonna get into this too deep.
I wanna include this for you because I
do think it's interesting.
And there's a lot of these, especially from
diligent Denzine doing a lot of this right
now. In fact, going back and forth very
weirdly with the current
owner of of Turning Point USA. There's a
bunch of them down here. But he says,
Charlie Kirk's camera staff, which you can see,
I'll show it in a second,
pivots to position facing where Kirk will be
carried out without even looking after he was
shot.
I I do find this very hard to
explain. He hears the shot and immediately pivots
to where Charlie Kirk is expected to come
out without looking.
Let's not forget, this other guy grabs the
camera, and that's what they're debating about. The
arguing that the police asked him to do
that, I agree. That doesn't make much sense.
But who knows today? Question everything. Police could
be just as competent incompetent as anybody else.
But, usually, I mean, we never saw the
site shut down. There was no tape. There
was no, you know, forensic. I mean, that's
very strange, at least in that very first
long period of time. So, this, what you
can see is this guy here is filming
Right
there.
Shot.
And turns right there. And they all run
over there and they're filming. It's very strange.
Like, he's getting ready to film the carry
away. I mean, there there probably could be
other ways you could explain that. Anyway, I'm
just including this because I do find this
really odd.
So
ask questions about this because it might like,
we already broke down. Actually, I'll grab that.
There's a lot of I I it's it's
very obvious, like with Butler, for example, and
it's not just because we want we wanna
always make that case. There's plenty of these
events that I'm blackout doesn't seem you know,
I don't even focus much on.
There's something about this that's obviously questionable, guys.
Every very prominent Republicans are pointing it out.
Include the show we did was Israel involved
with Charlie Kirk's death. Let's look at the
facts.
But what I think is interesting about this
is just that there's there are a lot
of anomalies. But what I was gonna say
is that, you know, I'm not planning on
diving super deep into the ongoing nuance of
these conversations, like I said before, in general,
because I feel like it's designed to to
make you lose your way. I will report
on the the facts that we can prove
as they develop. But the kind of, like,
nuance of the day to day, like, criticism,
the investigation of what they're finding that we
can't prove,
it's it's a it's a trap in my
opinion. For people like like, right now, I
need to continue to report what's going on,
what we can prove, what you can use
to research.
With that kind of conversation, I think we
did our due diligence to begin with. As
it continues to trickle out, I'll wait for
I'm the I'm like, you're not gonna see
another unless there's a major development, some deep
dive on the nuance of each thing. I
just don't think it's worth my time right
now. They're lying to you. I think we
can very easily see that, and that's usually
where I kind of hang it until we
find more facts. So clearly, we're being misled.
Let's wait for things we can prove going
forward. Just to make that clear. But, you
know, there are plenty of people out there
doing good work on this, and it's worth
your time to look at it. I just
think with how much I have to decide
between, that's where my mind is at.
But overall, you know,
it's ridiculous where these things are today.
Mel, I know that she pointed this.
She's let me get this straight. Yesterday, after
the New York Post published what it claims
is the letter written in May 2025 to
Benjamin Netanyahu from Charlie
Kirk. In the article that post the post
includes no details
of where, how it came into the possession
of the letter, only linking to an anonymous
script scribed account for easy download dissemination.
The story I mean, that's very weird. How
would you improve that? The story is then
immediately picked up by the most
sycophantic Israel supporters and distributed without any question
of both legitimate and a 100% authentic.
As both.
Although The Post does not, at any point,
claim to have verified the letter's authenticity.
Here's what the title is. Charlie Kirk wrote
of his deep love for Israel in a
letter Netanyahu
about how to counter rising opposition to Jewish
state in The United States.
Not that he was becoming aware of the
Zionist influence in our country and that Netanyahu's
influence on Trump was destroying this country, and
we suddenly started to see that and still
supported Israel, it seems. The nuance, the difference
between the Zionist influence and Israel as a
state or people in that country that don't
believe in Zionism. That's what I believe. Overall,
this just seems like a very, very shady
suspect letter dumped in the conversation to keep
the narrative going about what they want you
to think Charlie was. Can question it, but
there's a lot of suspect stuff like this
around it. Now lastly on this, guys, I'm
just so tired of these partisan games.
So here's Eric Daughtry, by the way. Just,
wow. Whatever they said cheerleader. He's Nick Sorder
with, you know, different color hair.
He says Steven Crowder put on a bulletproof
vest and hired an army of security to
go do change my mind. Maybe mind you,
the o the he only has to do
this because of the left. Now what does
that remind you of?
Yeah. Reminds you of exactly what the left
would do or what Zionist would do during
the campus protest. Right? They come out, there'd
be some Jewish Zionist comes out with 17
security detail and he they have to go,
oh, man. Look at all the detail he
has. That that's because of all the people
hating on Jews. Or so the so the
my point is they would use
the security they hired
as the proof that Jews are being attacked.
Remember, that's not what was happening. They've been
exposed a 100 different ways over. Not that
there isn't antisemitism or those things don't happen,
but in those cases, they were lying to
you. It's come out every which way in
the end, on video, in court, even Stefan
screaming about things that were said in in
schools that later the police came in and
said that's not actually true. It didn't even
happen. And they still say it.
The point is that their presence of their
security does not prove that bad things happening.
It proves that they think that or that
they're using that to prove that that's what's
happening. So Steven Crowder putting on a bulletproof
vest does not prove anything other than he
thinks is a threat. It does not prove
that the left is a threat to him.
Now it probably is in some ways. Just
probably like both sides of the crazy partisan
teams where politics might be a threat to
me because people like that are lunatics in
many ways. So
he has nobody should be taking violent acting
in violence against anybody. Just because he would
say things you disagree with does not mean
it's justifiable to do anything wrong. Like, I
don't even need to say that. The point
is that this is the partisan game of
doing the act, the show. You're putting on
the theater show to go look at how
much I'm at risk and I'm doing it
anyway so they can come out and say,
see, that the left causes.
Maybe, or maybe you're just doing it to
make a point because you're a political show.
I mean, it's just the same thing. That's
all I want people to ever point out.
It's the the partisans do this and use
their actions to point at the other side.
It constantly happens.
Look, imagine having to hire an army to
speak in America.
I'm willing to bet you he probably didn't
need to.
I mean, look, I'm not gonna diminish the
reality of what happened to Kirk. That's obviously
something crazy. I don't think this was some
random lone weirdo, but that happens regardless of
this and has been happening our entire existence.
It's them using these things to try to
make it something that it's not. And now
there's all this look. There's 75 posts today
from people making this big deal about him
walking out and putting his life at risk.
Yeah. So does everybody else doing the same
thing.
Now let's talk about
overlapping of Stargate. Now quick jumping back to
the health point. I wanted to put this
first before we finish with Israel,
and you'll see why. But let's talk about
So to connect this part, like so we
were talking about the Israel sort of influence.
Keep that in mind. The infiltration rather.
We also talked about the Pfizer infiltration. It
regard you know, we regard, like, the health
field and that rather just Pfizer manipulation
and what Trump is doing.
So connecting both of those things with Stargate
and then bringing it back into what it
really seems to be largely about, which is
surveillance.
But sub sense receptor again says, Jay Bodichar
reporting that the Cancer Clinical Data Initiative
is a
vast treasure trove of data. Now you know
what he's talking about.
I'll play it from Ellison as well. This
is Stargate.
So it's important to think, and that's why
I'm glad cent central receptor caught that is
framing it that way.
So think about this and recognize this is
the not only like I said, we knew
Stargate was not going away. It is an
mRNA platform. It's not stopping. Now all they're
showing you is that this is going forward
and they're either gonna just say call it
something else or at the end of the
day, it continues this direction. And this goes
for two reasons, both health and surveillance.
Well, it's it's such an important thing that
president Trump has done. There was a it's
an initiative he launched in 2019
called the,
cancer clinical data initiative, and it's we've collected
a a lot of inform Was that started
by Trump?
Not that I even necessarily care that much,
but I think, I I thought that was
under the Biden mister. It's just so funny
how they both they all do that. You
know, they'll try to claim the benefits of
the things the last one did and try
to push off their problems the other one.
It's just funny. I could be wrong, by
the way, but I thought that started in
the Biden. Anyway, the the point's the same.
About
patients with cancers, like kids with cancers.
And, you know, it's it's some of them
are so rare that very few patients have
them, and it's just a vast treasure trove
of data. This new initiative, we're gonna double
our investments in in analyzing these data with
state of the art AI technologies so so
that we can actually learn from them and
then get better results for patients. Like, your
patient comes in. We find the the molecular
signature of their cancer, and we find similar
patients,
you know, I'll anonymize, of course,
see what they got, how they got better,
and then change how we treat the patients
so that we learn that lesson. It's just
a it's just a great thing. It's a
feel good moment. The president, I mean, I
think he's done a really, really good thing.
Doc, I also read that this is gonna
be about sharing information with other health care
providers, being able to communicate quicker, faster, any
kind of new breakthroughs, treatments?
Yeah. So, I mean, this is one of
the problems with that. It takes often, like,
in science. You publish a paper, it takes
months and months and, like, you know, years.
This is this will really speed up the
the way that, that providers that, you know,
people who care for cancer patients, kids with
cancer communicate with each other.
It it'll it'll,
just
turbocharge our efforts on childhood cancer.
I mean, it's it's, you know, it's one
of those things where, like,
you wonder why other Hold on. I need
to make a point here. Something that stood
out to me that are developing my mind.
Let me go back a little bit. This
is actually really interesting to me. And I
don't forget. This is Stargate. Okay?
And the and the overlapping of the data,
it's really very obvious to me the way
they keep trying to frame this, which tells
me they know what they're doing.
Do you think they don't have access to
studies?
You don't think they share information behind them?
I mean, that's ridiculous. What they're talking about
is your data.
That's what I mean, he started with the
idea. There's a treasure trove, your data about
what you've experienced and what's going on with
cancer, not just the research that's being done
that they all can look at, that you
can look at.
Not in every possible case, but what? Let
me let me make this point.
Information with other health care provider with the
patient so that we learn that lesson. It's
just a it's just a great thing. It
was a feel good moment. The president, I
mean, I think he's done a really, really
good thing.
Doc, I also read that this is gonna
be about sharing information with other health care
providers, being able to communicate quicker, faster, any
kind of new breakthroughs, treatments.
Okay. So you could argue that, like, in
the process of, like, in this in, like,
a, you know, live like, like, at a
surgery. Right? It's a massive thing they find
out that they could share. But see, that's
not I mean, that even that doesn't seem
to make sense because these things are commonly
published,
if that happens, in something that is shared
and people can access. So, I mean, what
they're really getting at,
honestly, in any way I can even chart
carve this, is your information.
That's all this comes down to about trying
to act like it's some science sharing thing.
It's about your personal private data. That's what
they already told you, the unsiloed information to
train the I models. And they came out
and made the argument that we're gonna demand
that they show you what they have on
you. No more information blocking. It's like, first
of all, how do we know they're even
being honest about that? Secondly, all they're really
saying is that the providers then have the
right to your data. Because that's really what
that means. It's typical way of the government
to be like, we're giving you this thing,
which is really taking from you or enshrining
a thing that nobody ever wanted in the
first place. At least in my opinion, I
think we're
Sorry. So I bumped that on accident. Here.
Keep going. Master, any kind of new breakthroughs,
treatments?
Yeah. So, I mean, this is one of
the problems with that. It takes often, like,
in science. You publish a paper, it takes
months and months and, like, you know, years.
This is this will Okay. So explain to
me right there. So you okay. Jay Bonacharra
publishes a study.
Or rather, you know, it took years to
get the study done. In what way does
sharing personal cancer information somehow now make that
different?
I mean, really think about that for a
second. So you now have access to whatever
you just did in in the surgery or
your personal experience with cancer or whatever. They
had a breakthrough. If they had a breakthrough,
it was a study that was published. So,
in what way does that published information get
faster exchanged
other than I mean, I don't you I
mean, really think about this. This does not
make any sense. And I think it tends
tends to expose
the way that they try to make these
things make sense to you.
If it's a study that's being done,
if there's some kind of intermediary they can
now just dump it in, does that mean
that it's not peer reviewed? I mean, guys,
you have to be clear about this. If
you really be illogical, they're talking about your
personal information
and trying to make it about scientific studies,
unless I'm missing something, which is always possible.
Really speed up the the way that, that
providers that, you know, people who care for
cancer patients, kids with cancer communicate with each
other. Okay. But so if you now you
said that people care for cancer communicate. How
is that the same as a study being
done and somehow having that information get there
faster? Even the way he was talking makes
me think that he knew what he was
doing right there. Just being honest.
It it'll it'll, just,
turbocharge
our efforts on childhood cancer.
I mean, it's it's, you know, it's one
of those things where, like, I don't even
say that very well may be a positive
benefit,
genuinely.
Right?
The the the the merchant of this mRNA,
which is what it is, by the way,
don't forget. MRNA
AI driven platform,
and very well may, as they steal everything
they can from you and use it for
tons of other nefarious purposes, may have the
positive side effect of helping children with cancer.
Maybe that's worth it. You could decide.
I on the side of personal freedom and
constitutional rights.
You wonder why other presidents didn't do this?
I mean, president Trump did this in 2019.
Now we have new technologies with they're like
AI,
and he's following up with, a an investment
to make sure that we we take advantage
of all the data information we collected and
do Yep. And there it is. Does that
sound the same as sharing scientific studies before
they're published? It does not. Excellent gold standard
science so that the kid those kids with
cancer,
they'll have a better outcome than the kids
that you saw in the Oval Office. And
then, of course, they're they're doing great.
Okay.
You know, it's like it's like Neuralink. You
know? Oh, look. He's moving his arms again.
Like, do you think that's really what it's
gonna be? You think they're gonna somehow be
giving away Neuralinks to children without I doubt
it. I'd I hope so. But even if
that happens, it's not the only thing we're
using it for. Like, you know, oh, the
children with cancer. You know, the one of
the most absurdly
manipulated profiteering businesses out there, cancer,
which it is. It's a business industry of
basically promoting funding for research that is more
funding and advertising.
I mean, look at the breast cancer lie.
I'm not saying we shouldn't care about this,
but 90% of this budget, like, last time
I checked a while ago, a huge portion
of the budget goes towards advertising.
Braze breast cancer awareness. Okay? Or is anybody
unaware that breast cancer exists? That doesn't then
fold into some I guess the argument is
that produces more donations that become more. But
if the vast portion keeps going back into
advertising, it's a business.
Now, yeah, there is probably some positive benefits
to that. How about we just argue that
maybe you shouldn't put the vast majority into
your profiteering business or any number of those
things? This is about kids and cancer
as they present it to you. When you
go beyond that, it go it becomes something
quite different, I argue. And we'll get into
that. Now, this was just another post about,
you know, the turbo cancers and what's being
caused by the reality of the mRNA overlap.
They're gonna now make mRNA shots for cancer
that then turn out to cause cancer, might
be a problem.
In fact, I'll include
the one I tend to go to. It's
a great overlap. They haven't updated it since
2021,
but the Swiss policy research overlaps the very,
very clear peer reviewed science
showing that these things cause the the COVID-nineteen
shots, lymphocytopenia,
and immune dysregulation or suppression, which causes
turbo cancer.
This is peer reviewed science, guys. You could
deny it all you want, you could ignore
it, and sometimes fear of you could be
wrong. But you can't pretend like it's not
there,
which a lot of a lot of people
are doing. So this was the Stargate report
from Derek. Trump partners with Technicraft to promote
mRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism.
SoftBank, Oracle, OpenAI. There's Larry Ellison right in
the middle. So we'll get into some more
stuff about Larry Ellison as it overlaps with
Israel, but just recognize that this is everywhere
you look right now.
It's it's either
I mean, technocrats, scientists,
or globalists are all the same thing. Like,
everywhere you look, you can find these connections
right back to this one organized effort.
Let's not forget as well on the vaccine
side of it, in case you forgot, the
Trump admin has leaned
hard into self amplifying mRNA shots. Despite the
lie of canceling them, it's obvious that they
even the report that we point that he
put out to make that claim makes it
clear that amplitude,
our torus,
and other mRNA, like we just showed you
for any number of other things, are going
to continue. Even the original COVID shot, which
I still find insane to me.
The 2026
version of the mRNA COVID nineteen shot is
still there approved. I mean, it recently got
approved on August 27
after they said they were ending mRNA. I
mean, this is what I'm talking about. How
in the world can we pretend that makes
sense? It's not like they're saying shot's good
now. They lied to you about what they
were doing and did it anyway, and they
just hope that you were too blind to
see it.
And here is Toby Rogers pointing out that
Larry Ellison and I'll I'll play this for
what he said about the Stargate. Now think
about what was reported from Bhattacharya and what
they're doing. He didn't say Stargate, mind you,
but just to make it clear, it's the
exact same thing. So maybe they're trying to
get away from saying that because I think
they know they got a lot of pushback
from it. But here's what he said
way back when when they first announced it.
Cancers,
cancer tumors,
little fragments of those tumors
float around in your blood.
So you can do early cancer detection. If
you can do it using AI, you can
do early cancer detection
with a blood test,
and using AI
to look at the blood test,
you can find the
the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the
person. So we can again,
cancer cancer diagnosis
using AI has the promise of just being
a simple blood test.
Then beyond that,
once we gene sequence once we gene sequence
that cancer tumor,
you can then vaccinate the person,
design a vaccine for every individual person to
vaccinate them against that cancer.
And you can make that vaccine the
Do you know why that's so much more
alarming too? Because what when you when you're
making an individually designed shot, how in the
hell do you test that for safety? How
in the hell do you then verify that
in some larger way? They're gonna use the
platform model. Like we already said, I will
only bet you that they even argue that
they already proved the platform during COVID nineteen.
Therefore, all we need to do is add
the new information and pump it out. That's
what this was designed to do. That's what
they're doing. That I mean but even let's
just say they don't. How do you then
make a shot for one individual and claim
that that's been tested? It'll be tested before
they additionally
do things to make it just for you,
which means it'll be something different.
There's just no way you make sense of
this.
Or the idea that if there's a problem
after that, what happens then? How do you
prove that that was what happened? It's It's
a genetically altering thing. You're gonna say that's
happening out there anyway.
How do you prove it? You're the only
one
because you only had one shot. I mean,
you know, it's just obvious that this is
more of the problem no matter how you
spin this.
That mRNA
vaccine,
you can make
that robotically again using AI in about forty
eight hours. So imagine early cam Forty eight
hours. There's your test process, meaning none. Cancer
detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you and
have have that vaccine available in forty eight
hours. This is the promise of AI and
the promise of the future.
Cool.
That is what
Jay Bhattacharya was just talking about.
So keeping this in mind,
let's talk about
Larry Ellison's overlap with, I guess, the overtaking
of American media and Israel infiltration in the
government.
So this is a drop site news article.
Ryan Grim, Murtaza Hussein.
Larry Ellison vetted micro micro
Larry Ellison vetted Marco Rubio for failed t
to Israel.
Hacked emails reveal.
This says everything is coming together for Larry
Ellison,
the billionaire cofounder of tech giant Oracle. On
and off again, the richest man in the
world
and a staunch supporter of Israel
is set to take a lead role in
reshaping TikTok in The United States.
His son, David Ellison, is moving to take
over large swaths of the media, including CBS
News, CNN, Warner Brothers, and Paramount, reportedly bringing
the free press's Barry Weiss to shape editorial
discretion
or direction. Because, you know, she's completely you
know, I mean, they joke. She they're all
blindly pro Israel to a to a fault.
The quote, the Ellison family is concerning corona
excuse me. I can't read right now. The
Ellison family is cornering the market on attention
and data the same way
the Vanderbilts did, railroads, and the Rockefellers did
oil,
as Wired recently characterized it. How they plan
to operate that monopoly is of on course
to be tested out in what president Donald
Trump is calling New Gaza.
The techno dystopian free trade zone that is
to be administered by the Board of Peace
led by Donald Trump's and Ellison's longtime political
and business vehicle, Tony Blair.
All the good guys. Just ask Jones. He'll
tell you. Right? I mean, think about this.
The techno dystopian guys. I mean, how the
world this is this is everything we were
telling you. I mean, Whitney and I were
just talking about how incredible it is to
go back and listen to a podcast we
did five years ago, if not more. And,
I mean, it's not partially. This is why
I started sort of in a way I
did as well. I mean, it's identical.
I mean and look. I think our track
record speaks for itself. Anybody wants to look
for themselves, it's pretty obvious how much we've
been gotten I mean, consistently being accurate about
because we're just objective and nonpartisan, and I've
been wrong plenty of times. The reality though
is that everything we were highlighting, like, the
larger issues, same with a lot of people,
by the way, same with David Icke. I'm
not trying to make it unique. The point
is that outside of the mainstream alternative media,
what we were talking about is exactly where
we are. And yet those people are still
the ones out there pushing and shoveling their
partisan lies. But it's just crazy. They're they're
the ones sort of paraphrasing and captioning and
printing out our conversations from these baselines and
trying to put articles out. Like, it's just
it's all over the place. Everything is coming
to a head right now. The Gaza is
just the freedom city technocratic overtaking we were
talking about from October 7 forward.
And it
says, Ellison has given or pledged more than
$350,000,000
to the Tony Blair Institute, which Blair has
used to advance Ellison's vision of of a
marriage between government and corporate power, otherwise known
as fascism,
and tech surveillance. And I mean that by
the definition of the word.
Oracle, by providing
database and infrastructure and cloud computing services to
other huge enterprises like FedEx and Nvidia,
has you has quietly become one of the
most powerful companies in the world.
So you got Oracle, Palantir.
What's the central common thread? Israel, it seems,
and surveillance and control over your life. As
the nation's top diplomat,
secretary Marco Rubio, okay, apparently underneath Stephen Miller
today, you know what that means, also has
played a role in TikToks
in TikTok toks that steered the company toward
Ellison.
After playing a lead role as a senator
in demonizing the app, he was also closely
involved in the rollout of Trump's plan for
Gaza's future, which hands the enclave to Tony
Blair.
Hard to miss these overlaps. Right? Now what's
important to recognize is the TikTok point. That
was remember Greenblatt came out and said, we
have a TikTok problem. It's a generational problem.
It's not left and right. You have Netanyahu
now publicly in front of influencers. He's paying,
by the way. Just saying, yeah. We need
to grab TikTok. You just don't even hide.
That's my point. It's right in your face
at this point.
Trump's son-in-law,
Jared Kushner,
tasked the Blair Institute in the spring with
coming up with a post war plan for
Gaza, which was recently completed, the Times of
Israel reported. You know all this. The plan's
clear. We'll get to it again in a
minute. Whatever that was, I think right here.
This is the plan. This is what was
you and you got these fake Patriot Mag
influencers out there telling you this is fake
news. Classic.
Now, the interesting point quickly is the idea
of Jared Kushner.
Then I'll just play this really quickly. And
so the point is that Trump's son-in-law, Jared
Kushner, is the one that's been kind of
facilitating a lot of this behind the scenes.
You won't be surprised to find out.
Maybe it's over here. Hold on.
Yeah. I'll just play this real quickly. I
think this is funny.
So this is when she was asked about
very obvious, like, objectively clear conflicts of interest.
There's no there's no denying any of this.
Right? This person has moneyed interest with groups
that he's facilitating for the US government. That
that's a classic textbook conflict of interest that
usually that used to be a problem. Not
today, though.
Here's what she was asked.
Oh, this one here. Sorry.
Did the White House decide that it is
appropriate for Jared Kushner
to be working on matters that involve Qatar,
The UAE, Saudi Saudi Arabia,
three countries that combined have given him more
than $2,500,000,000
for his investment
firm. I think it's,
frankly,
despicable that you're trying to suggest that it's
inappropriate
for Jared Cook.
Is did he that was a pretty basic
straightforward question.
He's got conflicts of interest. What's your math
on that?
How dare you? How dare you suggest this
what the suggest the provable thing that's obviously
happening? I mean, that's insane.
Appropriate for Jared Kushner to be working on
matters that involve Qatar, The UAE, Saudi Arabia.
Three countries that combined have given him more
than $2,500,000,000
for his investment firm. I think it's,
frankly,
despicable that you're trying to suggest that it's
inappropriate
for Jared Kushner, who is widely respected around
the world That's not what I like. And
has great trust and relationships with these relevant
partners in these countries to strike a 20
comprehensive detail It's irrelevant. So great. The deal's
great. So that's not the question.
She knows that though. She's deflecting.
There's a conflict of interest. How did you
how did you reconcile that?
That's ridiculous. So and you're he did great,
and he's respected, and there's a big deal
that he made. That's insanely stupid. Like, you
couldn't have I could fault but you anybody
could have made it better. I mean, the
bottom line is they don't care.
And guess what? You're just like the left
you love to make fun of.
How dare you say the thing because it's
a ray? I'm insulted.
I'm offended.
I feel I'm offended by that. That's what
she's doing. You're clutching your pearls. You're doing
exactly what you make fun of the left
for doing. Guess what, guys? It's because they're
the same thing.
That's why I said this just to make
a joke out of it. I said, when
feigned outrage is all they can muster for
a very obvious conflict of interest or anything
that's obvious, then you know that they're exposed.
It's pretty simple. But, of course, look at
that.
It's almost like there's almost like it's not
even there on this platform.
That's impossible, isn't it? That was posted at
January.
So
that Rubio finds himself in such a central
position
is in part thanks to Ellison,
who has been a major,
patron of the Cuban American former senator from
Florida. Ellison's first vet first vetted Rubio,
because it's normal for technocrats and Israel influencers
to vet American politicians. Right? You know, that's
just normal way of things.
For his fealty towards Israel back in early
twenty fifteen, according to previously unreported email correspondence
reviewed by a drop site. What all this
is showing you is not new now. The
point is these oligarchs, these Israeli, Zionist, all
you know,
technocrat,
goblets, have been ultimately dictating US policy for
a long time.
As Secretary of State Rubio launched an unprecedented
crackdown on speech,
you know, for Israel, like before. It's not
new. It's not only from today. Right? Left,
right, left, right. Same damn thing. Unprecedented
crackdown on speech, detaining and attempting to deport
critics of Israel precisely for the crime of
their criticism of Israel.
Up in early twenty fifteen, Ellison was emailing
Ron Prosser, who was serving in the the
tail end of his time as Israeli ambassador
to United Nations.
He currently serves as the Israeli ambassador to
Germany.
Israeli government is the point. At the time,
Rubio was seen as a strong challenger in
the GOP presidential field that would ultimately include
underdog Donald Trump.
The the emails show the Israeli diplomat and
Ellison arranging to meet one another, with Prosper
soliciting Ellison's views on Rubio as a potential
candidate who would advocate on behalf of Israel.
Says on April 30, Prosper sent another message
to Ellison to follow-up,
sharing the his phone number and thanking him
again for the evening they spent together. Quote,
how was the conversation with Marco Rubio? Did
he pass your scrutiny? Do you have a
chance to talk about Israel? Would love to
chat.
A few hours later, Ellison responded in the
in the affirmative. Hi, Ron. Great meeting with
Marco Rubio. I set I'm I set him
up to meet Tony Blair. Marco will be
a great friend for Israel.
Right? All you got is swear your allegiance.
We'll do whatever needs to be done. That's
what they all do. This is not about
anything other than Zionist influence in politics.
A month and and that that's not to
say that there's not Jewish supremacy, just like
there's not there's there's overlaps to all of
it. That's a fact. But it's not only
about Judaism. It is clearly not even about
Judaism. It's about Zionism bastardizing Judaism. But even
Beth Salim, the leading Israeli human rights group,
will tell you that that's a Jewish supremacy
issue.
Which, you know, I'm gonna grab it.
Just for those new people that may try
to pretend that's something on January 2021,
leading Israeli human rights group, a regime of
Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the
Mediterranean Sea. But also remember that it's there's
massive groups of Orthodox Jews in Israel that
call out Zionism. I played that clip to
start from Avi Shalom, a Israeli
historian who's telling you that it's an apartheid
state. It's not hard to see.
Says a month later, Ellison, who had backed
Mitt Romney in 2012, hosted a fundraiser for
Rubio at his mansion in Woodside, California. That
would be only the beginning of a broader
range of support that the tech billionaire would
offer in attempting to bolster Rubio's campaign. Now,
don't forget, guys. Most of these people today
who are circling around Trump's administration,
they used to be Democrats,
like Dershowitz and anybody else. And the amazing
reality of the people who said they were
fighting Democrats in deep state to now suddenly
absorb them and be like, we're winning, shows
you you're being lied to. It It says
over the course of the twenty fifteen, twenty
sixteen primary, Ellison plowed $5,000,000
into the conservative solutions super PAC, which supported
Rubio, who, as Ellison privately hoped, advocated vocally
for Israel throughout the course of his presidential
bid and beyond.
Stephen Hilton told the San Francisco Chronicle that
he found it interesting that Ellison, who was
not then well known as supporting of the
right wing causes, should support a candidate as
conservative Marco Rubio. I see that it's not
about left and right. They use left and
right to manipulate you, in this case, to
support Israel. Overall, it's about their interests.
They laugh at us. They laugh people to
take part in the two party illusion. The
announcement by the Handala hack team that it
had gained access to Prosser's emails,
this is the group that was apparently responsible
for it, was made around the same time
it announced the trove of emails of Ehud
Barak, which we just talked about, which Drop
Site News published, which was very important to
read about, which talked about the important discussion
of
Israel, the beginning through Epstein and the Israeli
prime minister, provably connected,
creating what was the beginning of their
tech infiltration.
Very important article to read. It's linked right
there. Because this is what they this it
was Mongolia at the time he was setting
up a deal with, but this was Israel
using Epstein's connections to infiltrate tech worlds all
over the world.
In other words, it says if the relationship
resists, Ellison and Oracle are positioned to take
a lead role in redeveloping Gaza.
Great.
We don't have to guess at what type
of society Ellison should hope to usher in.
On an investor call last year, he said,
citizens will be on their best behavior because
we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going
on. That's the future he's building
here and anywhere else. Peace will be on
their best behavior
because we record we're we're constantly recording, watching,
and recording everything that's going on.
Citizens will be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on,
and it's
it's unimpeachable. The the cars
the cars have camera, you know, cam cameras
on. Oh, great. Okay. So let's pretend for
the moment that he's, you know, we so
he is involved with the reconstruction of Gaza.
What do you think he's gonna build? Well,
they already told you. A technocratic situation. They
have digital IDs, digital money, digital surveillance.
I mean, it's and so he's we're gonna
be watching. You can't do anything. We're gonna
be that's Israel doing that. So nothing new.
Just like I said last time, they're build
all they're gonna do is take what they
want, shove them into a new spot, or
they're gonna make them live in that situation.
It's going to be exponentially worse than what
they're dealing with now.
Now I'm not saying that in the minute
the, like, the real time starvation, bombing, raping,
and torture,
but they're live up until that point. So
this is almost designed to make them suffer
so much that they'll take whatever they hand
them next. It's kinda what it feels like.
The world should not allow any of this.
It's the most obvious genocide we've ever seen
in our entire existence, guys. It's absolutely insane,
and they're doing it anyway. They're just rolling
forward.
He says, signing off, he suggests that they
touch base again to continue collaborating on methods
to support Israel, him and Rubio,
or him and Prosser about Rubio. I will
rebase in Israel, he says. I would love
to talk to you about some ideas I
have that might coincide with things we spoke
about in our last meeting concerning your wish
to get more involved in Israel, too, Ellison.
The the email archive, which tapers off in
2016, contains no further
correspondence. Now it says, Ellison, who briefly became
the richest man in the world this year
after a rise in Oracle stock, I wonder
why, said in 2014 fundraiser attending attended by
other pro Israel billionaires, there's no greater honor
than supporting the Israeli military. We played that
clip for you. He's just like, Israel's the
only thing I care about. Ellison is also
known to be close to Israeli prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been a guest in
his home and his private Hawaiian island, Ellison
Owens.
In addition to Ellison's personal stance reporting
by responsible statecraft on separate set of leaked
emails from former Israeli prime minister, Yud Barak,
shows that other top officials at Oracle are
aligned with this goal of influencing US public
opinion towards Israel. It's not secret, guys. They're
literally
reframing the com they see that that's why
I framed it the way I did today.
The American people are not buying it, but
they're just
consolidating control over every data source, every media
per and then yet
calling you racist or pointing out obvious consolidation
of Zionism.
That's the game, guys.
I mean, you could even Steven let's just
even say you don't think that's the case.
You could argue who it doesn't matter who's
doing it. Let's just say it's even Larry
Ellison by himself. That is a control that
we should not allow that that it's not
in every context, this is a violation of
I mean, even regard to monopoly,
monopoly laws, but free speech is the real
point I'm getting at today because they've already
been censoring people in real time around Israel
and so many other things. And this guy's
tapped into the highest levels of power, not
just media, not just corporations,
to control the public influence,
to counter the rise of boycott divestment sanctions.
That was a direct point they made. What?
That's unconstitutional.
You can boycott, divest from, and sanction whatever
you want in the sense of your own
personal actions, but the mean is to drive
government to do it. But the idea is
it's always your right to be investing in
any of those things. It says that means
getting the mess getting the message to the
American people in a way that they can
consume it.
That's propaganda, guys. We believe that we have
to abet and the love and respect for
Israel and the American culture. Whether or not
we want it is the point. Whether or
not we feel it is the point. Their
game is to force that idea because that's
what's in Israel's interest. Is that not hard?
Is it it's impossible to miss
as part of the and it's while they're
committing a genocide
and asking you to praise them for it.
As part of the agreement, Oracle will audit
TikTok's all important content algorithm, which will be
retrained
and operated in The United States outside of
ByteDance's control, which already influenced by Israel in
the first place is just more consolidated by
them today.
It says, since the onset of the war
and genocide in Gaza Strip, pro Israel officials
in The US have fixated on TikTok,
allegedly being the primary factor driving the rapid
decline in support for Israel among young Americans.
All that means is the one of the
platforms that was getting the most traction on
things you could prove about Israel.
That belief has also been echoed by Israeli
officials as well as influential pro Israel activists
like ADL and Jonathan Greenblatt, who emphasized to
the Israeli Knesset
earlier this year the importance of capturing TikTok.
Netanyahu himself has been the most forthright about
the importance of Israel and its supporters taking
control over the video platform, a gift that
Ellison now appears ready to grant him. Quote,
weapons change over time, Netanyahu said. The most
important ones are on social media.
That's what Netanyahu just said.
So
beyond this one,
here is what Chris Menon points out in
regard to the same conversation highlighting the
emails.
Just Just wanna point that out. Allison was
exchanging intel with Israeli prime, Israeli ambassador, Ron
Prosser. That's the person.
Now as a private citizen, it's different. But
the way he's connected now, I mean, it's
just it's obvious what's really happening here. And
and what everything Trump's doing every day with
all of his actions are creating either a
distraction or an error that allows this kind
of lawful activity under a guise of national
security or threats of the left or terrorism
or whatever. It's just it's what they've always
done, but it's in a much more immediate
and real time, like, in your life kind
of way.
Now don't forget this on social media, guys.
This is what we just played the other
day. This is Israeli politician recently talking about,
his name is Yair Golan,
that the next step and this is on
the September 27, mind you. We've seen action
since then from all of them. Our Kash
Patel, statements made,
Allison. Okay. So the point is he says
the next step,
controlling social media,
blocking anything author authorities label as propaganda.
It's already starting. Let me play it again.
During the twelve day
shoot.
How do I do that?
Man, I'm just like over 10 lately for
missing some missing a video.
Gosh, so weird. I don't know how I
do that. Let me grab it.
Oh, you know what it is? Now I
remember. I think I wasn't gonna I'm gonna
play it now since I stopped. Just to
you could laugh at me right now. When
I'm going through my process and I'm getting
ready, I do I go through and I'm
like, should I play that video? Maybe I
should.
And sometimes I'm like, no, I played it
last time. I'll just make the point and
then I forget.
This is where we are right now. Where
we at on time? Everything looking good.
Okay.
Here is the video.
So this one is just like I said,
it is the
Israeli politician and the kind of their meeting
discussing what the next steps will be for
what they're gonna do on social media, which,
of course, is wildly unconstitutional
or or just in general is something that
Americans would disagree with. But remember, this is
and we this is one important discussion we
had in the in the IMA panel.
These the US government was you know, ignoring
the Israel part for a second, the US
government is without question because they've proven this,
influencing these platforms.
So I argue, but that very does clearly
make that an issue of free speech.
To change that would be to push the
US government out of that that point, and
that would be a private company. But it's
very fuzzy line because they pretend it's not
true. But the point being is that this
is a problem we all agree on. The
next thing
I will do,
we will do,
is to put restriction
on the social media
in a way
that not allow to make brutal propaganda
in the social media.
Right. So all they really mean is that
you can't put out things that we disagree
with.
Not the same as saying false. Right?
Don't forget. I this is what TikTok did
right away, appointed an IDF soldier to censor
critical content to Jews and Israel as Megatron
writes. In return, Trump will lift the ban.
Well, in one case, but the point is
that's what happened. And they instantly started censoring
Israel and even conversation about Larry Ellison taking
over the platform
instantaneously.
People like
James Lee or,
anybody. They they were seeing this right away.
And he just talked about Oracle, right, being
inside, talking about the government actions,
or Oracle and Larry Ellison being involved with
what's happening in Gaza. Well, let's not forget,
this monster is the person who is currently
working with Oracle, as well as Microsoft and
Google.
Or he's adviser to Oracle and Microsoft and
Google.
He'll he'll he'll lead falude, however you say
that. One of the people we've called out
many times over since October 7 at the
very least, here he is praising
a terrorist act.
I mean, not like, he's making now you
see it. Now you don't. Are you claiming
those were terrorists in there? Are you claiming
there was a tunnel under there? Oh, yeah.
We're past that point where you have to
lie about that anymore. I get it. So
you're just going, yay. Destroy the infrastructure because
that's not a crime?
These are the ones who are gonna be
advising the building of Gaza or rather whatever
they turned in. I mean, that's yes, guys.
This is the overlap. There's no decoupling Israel's
influence in this.
Glenn Greenwald says there were two venues in
The US where Israel criticism thrived. I think
it's more than that, but his point is
the same is that US campuses, TikTok, and
probably two of the most. The campus problem
was solved by Trump's new hate speech codes
because that's not like the left you made
fun of. Right? Firing professors and DEI for
Jewish students, which was see, this is my
point. The the the the left comes out
with a broad problematic thing. The right comes
out and makes it far more focused in
a much serious degree.
But you wanna say, it's not DEI. It's
only about antisemitism. It's the same you're making
it specific and much more important. It's a
precedent setting reality. It's it's a stepping stone.
Left, right, left, right. It keeps going the
same way. The TikTok problem was solved by
giving giving it to the IDF financier, Larry
Ellison.
This point speaks for itself. And look at
some of these posts. Democrats and Republicans are
both controlled by Israel through AIPAC. Censored.
It's not a joke, guys. See? That's what
they truly wanna hide from. Not the left
right. They like the left right divide. That
is the problem.
Your content is against community guidelines. Why are
you pointing out what we can prove?
I mean, you have to realize, look at
this again.
Here's what it says.
Democrats and Republicans are both controlled by Israel
through APAC. Now you can debate controlled,
but is anyone debating that APAC is 100%
funding every single politician that could get his
hands on? And Israel is working through APAC?
I mean, they promote that.
So the truth is the problem. That's very,
very clear.
Ellie points out that executives at Oracle, like
the newly
like, the likely new owner of TikTok, are
very outspoken. This was on October 3. Are
very outspoken in Israeli media about the company's,
quote, mission to support the state of Israel
and unequivocal support for Israel. Insufficiently pro Israel
oracle staff are sent for mental health counseling.
Look at this. Responsible Statecraft.
Oracle execs. Love Israel or maybe this isn't
the job for you?
Is that even legal? No. It's really not.
But realize that that nobody's gonna enforce these
things because the most powerful, influential, rich in
I mean, politically or or these are the
people that rule the world.
I don't mean that even facetiously, guys. These
are the most powerful, most influential. I mean,
at least in this US sphere, but it
goes way further than that. And these are
the people that are making these decisions.
Most people like, look, you know, Trump has
very clearly set the the tone that if
you do things that are that even bother
him, he'll destroy you or at least he'll
give it his best try. Who cares if
it's legal?
One says the idea to ban TikTok or
force its sale was originally justified
in the name of stopping foreign influence over
American youth.
Somehow, the end result was to forcibly put
it in the hands of a multi billionaire
private IDF donor whose primary life cause is
supporting Israel, because that makes sense. It does
when you understand what's going on. Also,
leaked email reveals communication between conspiracy company
leading the TikTok purchase and former Israeli prime
minister, Ehud Barak.
Quote, we believe that we have to embed
the love and respect for Israel and the
American culture. We just read that to you.
TikTok investor.
I mean, the idea that the primary point
is to use it to influence I mean,
that's not even secret, but the point is
you say these things and you're racist all
of a sudden.
That's why people are waking up to this.
That doesn't make sense to an honest person.
The same company secures UK Ministry of Defense,
home office, foreign office, and n h NHS
data.
You understand what's happening here? Same with Palantir
and with Oracle. It's the same kind of
game. Now I'm not saying it's necessarily the
same thing. I believe it's part of the
same agenda.
Low key is simply pointing out, do you
have Oracle over here doing all of this
stuff and you can Oracle in The United
States and Israel and he goes, guess what?
Same company is also working with the Ministry
of Defense, Home Office, Foreign Office, and NIH
data because it's happening everywhere,
all over the place.
Here is what Ryan Grim had to say.
Jen x girl posted this. Don't forget to
check out her amazing article for T Lab
about the zombie economy. I will be having
Catherine Austin Fitz coming up in a few
days to go over this very interesting overlap
of conversate of of points of the zombie
economy, the Israeli bonds, the Americans being forced
to invest in them even though it's losing
the money,
and a few other points. Trump being anti
capitalist, for example. We're gonna have a good
conversation about that. I'll grab her article while
this is playing, by the way. And I'll
she has some other points we'll go into,
but check this
out. This is what she's calling Israel's eighth
front war.
Citing how rats actually, that Israel just approved
another $40,000,000 boost to their global propaganda budget.
This is on top of a $150,000,000
increase over what they had already been doing.
$24,000,000
of that is for, quote, global influence campaigns,
and $16,000,000
is to finance international delegations visiting Israel.
So right there, they're simply telling you, like,
we're spending incredibly, which is not secret. Every
government does it. But in like, more than
anybody to control thought,
to influence opinion, and not just,
hey, propaganda. Here's, you know, commercials about how
great Israel is,
buying companies,
employing people. You know, this is the this
is the with the startup nation idea, creating
fake companies that they use to influence opinion.
Mhmm.
So these are the,
whether it's lawmakers
or or influencers,
they they fund your trip,
flights, you know, from New York to Tel
Aviv, nice hotels, good food you know, free
food and drinks, travel,
like your entire trip is paid for. They
send good looking IDF soldiers around with you.
It's like just a solstchek.
Hegzef type of soldier. Yeah. Exactly. Yes.
No. BMI is appropriate for that. Hegzef would
be. No beards. Not ashamed. No beards. No
beards.
And try to give them a good time,
and then they go back and and and
they have warm warm feelings, and they have
and they meet people who dangle, you know,
future opportunities.
This this is much more direct. Like, here's
$7,000
Say something nice about us on TikTok. Mhmm.
And then then they have the problem of,
oh, but nobody wants to hear that. So
they're so they then they take over TikTok
and juice the algorithm so that you have
to hear it. Like, it's just gonna show
up in your for you page. The Well,
that's an important now see, think about that.
Just like with Twitter, guys, the point is
that then it it gives the impression to
average people that that's what everyone's like. It's
popular even though it's not even though it's
not even the the the vast majority of
people on the platform don't want it to
see it, don't agree with it. But you
get the Joneses and Kurt all these bigger
people, the Nook Sorters out there
pumping these things out and getting lots of
feedback because the algorithm is forcing it in
front of everybody, and then even they think
it's popular. And they think it's a it
is a complete
cluster f. Like, it's designed to either you
know, and this is my point about a
lot of these people in the mainstream alternative
media. They don't even recognize that they are
being manipulated.
I think that's the largest part of that.
I don't mean that they're honest. I just
mean that they don't recognize
exactly what we're talking about.
Point. Yeah. So this is something that Nick
Cleveland's stat reports over at Quincy, which is,
I actually think, getting underreported.
This is coming from Brad
Parscale,
also. And Or Trump campaign manager. Right? Right.
And part of this is also about I'm
trying to find the exact part where, Nick
mentions this, but part of it is also
about gaming chat GPT Mhmm. And AI search
engine. It's it's, like, specifically in
That's that's that is like the main focal
point I argue. For that's what Grok is
being trans, why they're altering it to you
know, they're they're trying to get it to
a place to where they can manipulate it
while making you think that it's working.
I think that largely there, I think.
And that's for Israel.
What Nick reports on. He has a new
this is this is what it is. So
he did a follow-up,
and it's outlines the Brad Parscale of it
all. And Brad Parscale
is also, this is this is coming to
Salem
Media Group. Did you did you catch this
part of it? So
Clock Tower, I think that's Parscale's group, will
integrate its pro Israel messaging into Salem Media
Network properties, a conservative Christian media group that
boasts a vast radio network and produces high
high profile shows such as Q, Hewitt, Larry
Elder, Right View with Laura Trump, and April,
the Conservative Media Network, and Donald Trump Jr.
And large Trump as significant stakeholders in the
new company.
Wow. Wow. She's I mean, is that sped
up? I didn't think it was. She talks
faster than me if that's the case. Good
for her.
Sorry. I just lost my spot.
Salem Media Network Properties, a conservative Christian media
group that boasts a vast radio network and
produces high profile shows such as Hugh Hewitt,
Larry Elder, Right View with Lara Trump, and
April, the conservative media network, and Donald Trump
Jr. And large Trump as significant stakeholders in
the new company. Salem Media Network did not
respond to a question clarifying whether it would
be compensated by caught tower for promoting messages
on behalf of Israel or how these messages
would be integrated. That is American media. Right.
That's that is actually some, like, conservative news
outlets that could be then infiltrated by paid
paid
propaganda. There's a difference. And that's not Okay.
Okay. And then
do you think that would be what Marjorie
Taylor Greene is discussing when she says we
need to label these things?
I doubt it. And even if she did
mean that, maybe she does. I doubt that's
what would happen. The platform would not see
it the same way, or they would make
an exception for certain. I mean, you know
how this works.
A distinction without a difference. Propaganda is propaganda.
Yes. When people are actually getting paid by
a foreign government to do propaganda in a
sensible news outlets, That's a completely different ballgame.
Yeah. So so follow the money here. So,
well, I guess, the money starts in The
United States. So it is American taxpayer money.
But then so then we we
Yeah. I think it is sped up just
barely. I didn't think so at first, but
either way.
Subsidize Israel. Israel uses the money then to
send to Brad Parscale, the Trump campaign manager,
who then gives it to Lara Trump and
other people presumably Mhmm. In order to foist
Israeli propaganda
into these media properties
because ChatChpT
is trained
to believe that these media properties have some
level of reliability and substance to it. ChatChpT
is probably told, you know, don't just
scrape things from government
propaganda websites and then believe it to be
the case. Like, yep. You're it's more reliable
to trust news sources
rather than direct propaganda. So you so you
pay to have the propaganda then smothered in
into the news properties, these right wing news
properties. And and the point that you said
but kind of isn't explained well enough, I
think, is that they so they give a
certain rating to them. Right? So if you're
CNN, Fox News, you you the the you
know, they're wrong just like like anybody. And
and I think to some degree, the platform
the algorithm takes that into consideration, but it
gives you a grading. Right? So CNN, Fox
News, you get, you know, five points, whatever,
just making something up. But then
some lower rung ones get two points. Right?
I argue social media post one or whatever.
Like, that's it's the grading. So everything's taken
into consideration,
and then there's also a counterbalance on how
often you could be wrong or whatever else.
But so if they're at the higher level,
they're automatically taken at some higher you know,
they get a higher grading in general. So
he's just saying if they if they can
force their way through these, which they already
do, by the way, but in more prominent
ways, you'll effectively slant the AI. You will
create a situation where the AI will then
repeat more toward that direction than anything else.
And then especially if they found it 75
times that day with 75 platforms,
it takes over the conversation.
Like, it's not hard to see how easy
that is to game. And I think they
can do that. They have the finances. They
have the wherewithal.
They can do it. And then ChatGPT absorbs
it into
its its code. And then when you ask
ChatGPT,
you know, is Israel good?
ChatGPT responds based on the raw material that
it's producing from,
these, from these news shows, which then also
can then they then they have Wikipedia armies
that then try to edit Wikipedia articles Mhmm.
Sourcing to these news shows
that they have All very provable. In case
you don't know that, by the way, like,
they've had entire documentaries how Israel outlines their
Wikipedia army. It's not a joke. Even though,
weirdly enough, you'll see people online call you
racist for pointing it out. Fought internally inside
Wikipedia to get labeled as credible news sources,
and then you tilt Wikipedia and then and
Wikipedia becomes raw material for, ChatGPT and other
other AI as well too. Because within a
few years,
everyone's understanding of reality will be shaped by
whatever
these AIs tell them is the reality. So
there's this massive
arms race to shape what that reality is
gonna look like. And by the way, this
happened right after Nick mentions this.
We probably mentioned this on the show, but
the SKDK Knickerbocker campaign to run a bot
farm for the Israeli Narrative Relations of Social
Media. Yeah. Yeah. Thing that we reported on.
Yeah. Right. Yeah. Exactly. So this is coming
Lest you think it is just conservative media
that's being infiltrated, Democrats are taking money to
to infiltrate social media with these Yeah. Narratives
as well, which is man. No. And and
it can't happen a moment too soon for
Israel because let's take a look at the
trash that they're that they're currently putting out.
Right.
Left, right,
right? I you know, point is, credit to
them. Right? They're clearly giving you an objective
perspective of what they're looking at. Whatever you
think about it, question everybody. So do I.
Very well done right there. And the reality
is pretty obvious to see, guys. They're funding
both sides. So, you know, you can't pretend
one side's the deep state, one side's the
problem. They're doing it to bull. They're clearly
infiltrating on all of it. And they're I
think they've seceded a long time ago. We're
just seeing this final push because the American
people are the ones changing their opinion.
And they're pulling every possible string they can,
and, apparently, they hold most of them. That's
what it seems like. So that's important to
recognize. And as she writes here, $40,000,000
propaganda, a $190,000,000
total, 24,000,000 for influencers, 16,000,000 for Israel trips,
TikTok, TikTok, and Twitter. TikTok sold to Zionists,
600,000 to democrat PR for bot army, 1,500,000
Trump campaign, you know, or the $100,000,000
for Mary Madison to annex the West Bank
despite claiming he'll never let that happen even
though it's literally already in the process and
almost done. It's just insane where we are,
guys. And all the other points are important
as well. The far registration showing $900,000
for the influencers that Netanyahu is paying,
democrat PR firm to run bot army for
Israel. It's not I mean, this is the
Max's post about the, Israel hiring Trump's former
campaign manager we talked about.
Pan Gandhi,
disband the foreign influence task force at DOJ.
This is the group that investigated FARA violations.
Whole video at the bottom for you to
check out.
Now this is what I was talking about.
Interesting enough. This is Ian Carroll. 229,000
views. I traded Google for AI, and you
should too. Very dangerous right there. You guys
can make your own decisions. I mean, I
think it's, you know, I I think it
should be few and far between. Where if
you fee find it necessary or think it
valid, you know, but never blindly take it
at face value, ever. And the idea that
you should ever just fall into that, I
mean, if like, my point is is you
ever end up even if you think it
were even if it does work perfectly for
you, that the shoe will eventually fall. The
the last shoe will fall where all you
know, now that's your only possible source, and
now it's easy to slowly slant you in
any direction they want.
Funny enough, here's Ian Carroll, you know, making
this post, and this he cares all crazy.
Check this out.
Check out what's sitting on his desk.
Hold on.
Coming up here, I think.
And then we're gonna pretty much wrap up
with the last few sections.
Maybe it's in the beginning here somewhere. So
I just think it's funny. So, you know,
you remember his comments
about Whitney Webb.
And he's said very positive things about her
too, but I find it strange the way
that he's made comments about that. And he
just hasn't makes a point to have her
book sitting right in the right in the
shot. It's you know, who knows? I think
he's one of these people who's balls in
the category of not being aware of how
people manipulate, you know, his rise to start
him out of nowhere and, you know, but
it's hard to say whether they continue to
do that. I've had moments where I thought
he was starting to recognize that and push
back, you know? Consider everything, question everything. Always.
But the idea that you're, you know, you
should too, that feels wrong to me. And
this is a very highly, highly edited, very
well produced video.
Well, he's got the money for it, it
seems, with all his influence. But Gen x
is, Girl or Great article, how the American
tax dollars how American tax dollars prop up
Israel's zombie economy.
Might as well share
that.
I added a few more things, by the
way, for the share blue sky and, I
think, Mastodon down there for those that use
it.
Okay.
Now influence in general has been there for
quite a long time. Now this is a
reasonably new one. This is from 2023,
and this is Haaretz.
Anti Semitic influencers,
fake journalists
inside an Israel
Israeli factory
for online deception.
Been going on a long time. This is
harratz. For Israeli owned Percepto International,
slandering the International Red Cross and recruiting an
antisemitic Internet influencer are legitimate tactics. So paying
antisemitic
influencers
to go online and say antisemitic things. Now
why would they possibly do that?
Because that's the way Zionism works. They need
to point at the antisemitism that largely doesn't
exist to say that's why we have to
exist even though Zionism is not Judaism. It's
a manufactured hate cycle. Most Jews are starting
to call this out in the world, at
least from my at least from my perception.
I think it's very clear. I mean, if
you get prominent people like Seth Rogen coming
out and going, we've been lied to you
about everything about Zionism in Israel. It's easy
to see that this has infiltrated to the
highest levels of everything, and they're desperate. That's
why this is all happening, in my opinion.
Recognize that they've been lying to you about
every part of their existence, their entire existence,
and that's not about Jewish people at large.
The reality is they're bringing on people
to be the people they point to to
say, see, look at the problem, and censor
Americans, and everywhere else for that matter.
Now here's what Kash Patel recently came out
and said. I think it's important to consider
the timing of all of this.
Let me grab it. Damn it.
I was just gonna read it, and then
I decided not to.
So Kash Patel I mean, there's a lot
to overlap with Kash Patel. I mean, I
think he's the easiest target, in my opinion.
I and I think, you know, whether you
wanna talk about the PragerU overlap with his
girlfriend,
worth considering, guys, and very much matters. I
wouldn't say that proves anything necessarily, but it's
worth knowing. I just think that he's, you
know, somebody who is desperate for power, somebody
who wants to be seen on as the
highest echelon even though it's pretty self evident
that he's not, would be easy to manipulate
in my opinion.
Here's what he he's what he recently said.
Answer in my opinion is social media is
wildly out of control, and there's too much
clickbait in this country. And one of the
things I highlighted in congress in my testimony
last week was if we wanna protect our
youth, we gotta get more involved in social
media and online platforms because that's where the
folks, the assassins of this world get radicalized.
That's where they're the long lived after. Yep.
And isn't that the left? Is that exactly
the argument? Right? Bad ideas and people go
crazy, so we have to censor ideas. Isn't
it
amazing how we get to this exact same
point from the people who were screaming about
that before? Because none of them mean any
of the things they say. They just like
to get you on their side. I am
talking about everybody everywhere, but people that are
in these positions.
How do you possibly make sense of that?
That's unconstitutional.
Like, of course, in the context that we
know the use the US government's involved in
these platforms or the Israeli government for that
matter, which makes it a crime. But overall,
no Americans believe in this, and they argue
the same thing. Well, I shouldn't say no,
but in the context of their support group.
Republicans never wanted this. They don't call for
that except for the screaming idiots at the
top that now wanna censor back on the
left because they just wanna dunk on the
other side. Most people who have been told
why this is a problem don't then turn
around and go do it right back to
them because they're not children.
Most of the top people in the paradigm
seem to be, but I don't think most
Americans are because they it's not it's counter
their own interests. It's a very simple thing.
In general. And so we have to get
after that problem set, and I asked for
congress to help in doing so. But speaking
of Charlie Kirk, who was a very dear
friend of mine,
and then I was tasked with leading the
nationwide manhunt to find the perpetrators involved. Of
course, we were gonna use every resource we
have to find every single person involved, and
the investigation's still ongoing. But we,
as one of the pillars of my leadership
here at the FBI is transparency.
We've produced more
Right. You know, it's just just a bear.
Really? You're gonna stand with that? Where are
the Epstein files? Documents. Where are all the
people you told us you'd arrest? Where whereas
is there anybody they've I mean, show me
one Democrat that is arrested. Not that it's
saying that's what I'm calling for. That was
the promise. That's what most Republicans are saying.
Where are all the people you said would
be arrested? What about all the people that
you said were stealing during Doge? All the
Social Security and the lies and the over
what are the holdovers that were cheating and
lie? What happened? Nope. Not a single person.
So probably all those were lies.
The congress and my last two predecessors combined
by twofold,
Just to put it in perspective. So when
we take our investigations ongoing, but we,
as one of the pillars of my leadership
here at the FBI is transparency.
We've produced more documents to congress than my
last two predecessors combined. Ah, yes. But are
they documents that matter, Kash Patel?
No. They're not. By twofold.
Then I can come I'll walk into congress
and throw a thousand papers near. Does that
mean that I'm winning? I mean, how about
we actually count things that you know, you
can throw a bunch of redacted information while
lying to the face of everybody as Massey
calls you out for completely hiding the people
that we already should have access to or
pretending that you're locked out from it even
though it only applies to Florida. You know,
all these things that you got exposed in
real time for lying about. But, yeah, most
transparent history apparently.
Just to put it in perspective. So when
we take our investigations out to the streets,
I have the same ethos. And this is
how we got Charlie Kirk's assassin,
alleged assassin,
so fast. Whoops.
The Boston Marathon Bomber,
which happened in Downtown Boston during the Boston
Marathon, took five days, and he there was
a police officer who was killed in that
manhunt.
Luigi Mangione, who
allegedly murdered,
an individual, the CEO of the You get
where it's going. I'm great because we got
this guy quick. Well, guess what? The vast
majority of people who support you don't think
that's the killer. Whether that's the case, it's
just a sign of where we are today,
and I find that very interesting. I also
agree that none of this really makes any
sense. And realize he's still yet to have
even confessed, and it's only everybody else working,
and the the idea of the entire thing
doesn't make any sense. The text messages are,
like, pretty much the only thing, and some
note that they don't have. And the inconsistency
of what they claim, do you have a
photograph of the note? If that's possible, why
isn't it being shown? Or you say your
for your aggressive, investigative posture
gave you I mean, what? This is insane.
Something's missing. That's pretty objectively obvious, but who
knows what that could be?
The point showing this
was censor censor censor the Internet. We gotta
shut down the Internet. Right? I mean, haven't
we heard this before? Isn't this the same
thing that Trump was trying to tell you?
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet. And we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them, maybe in certain areas, closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. As always, foolish because they're
right,
but you can easily prove it is freedom
of speech issue. And same thing he said
about the flag. Those are dumb. Those are
stupid people. He said stupid in the other
one. But he's but they're right. It is
a con it is it's unconstitutional,
objectively. But he's saying you're stupid for pointing
out that he's wrong, not that you're wrong.
Or maybe he doesn't know that, which is
even more alarming. Either way, it's not new,
guys. This is the same old game.
It's about restriction, control.
And and they love to say, we care
what the thing the Democrats are taking from
you, because that gives them control. Look, they
care about me. Look how much they're saying
my things. Look, they're repeating what I like.
That's what that's how simple that becomes for
them. And even like, I'm not saying there's
not it's impossible there are people that are
on your side, but you have to recognize
as a child could do, if you're stand
back and that people can simply go with
the thing you're saying,
even though they don't mean it.
Right? It doesn't matter how many MAGA shirts
they wear or how much they say, they
can just repeat back to you what you
wanna hear.
Because I've got for example,
Patel comes out and says and this is
what's funny, by the way. He like, apparently,
the a screenshot of a Fox News article
is his official process for releasing information. James
Comey wrote love letters to the ADL and
embedded FBI agents with them, which is still
happening to this very day, by the way.
A group that ran disgraceful ops on spying
on me. Yep. Still. Right now. Uh-huh. That
era is over. No. It's not. This FBI
won't partner with political
fronts masquerading as what? Liar.
I'm I'm I'm 100% on the side that
that's completely not true. Not just that it's
not happening. You could prove that. Not yet.
Maybe it'll start tomorrow.
Do you really believe they're gonna give up
what seems to be like their only outlet?
The reality of what the FBI has been
and continues to be up until this very
moment?
They're just this is a statement with nothing
to back it up. Just like Tom Homan
saying 100 thou thousand percent increase. It's not
true. Look.
There's no evidence whatsoever. And if they ever
try, they're not even they're not even attempting
to try to give you something to look
at. And you can prove it looking at
what you can prove. It's shocking.
It's just they just say things. That's not
new. Politicians lie to you. But they do
it in ways today that are just hard
to wrap your mind around.
Glenn comes out and says the ADL
has bullied and coerced huge numbers of institutions
to take orders from it about whose views
should be deemed extremist
and thus prohibited.
And which by the way is right there,
counter to free speech, no matter what the
idea is. He said and he says, and
who shouldn't. As but one example, PayPal
uses ADL to decide who should be expelled,
like TLAB, and stole $6,000 from us and
completely shut us out of the platform. Yep.
Now my point is, he says we're done
with the FBI or at the ADL. Right?
Well, just simply ask Grock.
Aside from Patel's statements, has the US government
taken any meaningful or documented steps toward its
end with this association? Now I look myself
on places you might find that but can't
find anything.
Whether this is accurate or not, you can
question. We all should. As it says, no.
The US Government has not taken any meaningful
or documented steps to end its association with
the Anti Defamation League,
aside from FBI director saying so on Twitter.
That's the that's the gist of it. I'll
include this. You can read it for yourself.
So maybe, maybe tomorrow, Ryan. Maybe tomorrow everything
will change. I hope so. Do I think
it'll happen? No. I don't. I think it's
very obvious to see who's actually in control
of whom here.
It's the other way around. But don't don't
worry, though, because Nick Sorter came out and
screamed with that with with
breaking news as always, with his red light
as always, with 17 exclamation points that what
Cash just said is true even though you
can't prove it. Because good journalists blindly repeat
the FBI director. Right?
Breaking. Kash Patel confirms the FBI fully
confirms as if it was a claim that
was already out there. No. No. That hadn't
been discussed until he said it. So you
guys are he's just so worthy of making
fun of, by the way. But
Khash Patel reports
and states for the first time that he's
cut ties with the ADL even though that
has not happened yet.
James Comey brought on the ADL. He just
repeats what he was writing over there.
That's what their job is to just cheerlead
and point to what the team says. That's
legitimately what they do, even when those things
contradict what they are fighting for or what
they said the day before.
It's kinda crazy.
But the point is, he said, we did
it. The thing happened, even though you can't
prove it did. And far as I can
tell, it didn't actually happen.
Now look, you can say those things, but
there's meaningful overlaps that still exist.
So you saying on the part of it
is not the end of that. The ADL
right now is still partnered with them and
still works with them and is still partnered
with with Twitter, for example.
But what I found very interesting, even though
and this is the same idea. ADL is
still overlapped with Twitter.
What you could check it's right now the
reality.
Elon comes out on the first and says,
the ADL is a hate group.
And they're pointing out what you know, the
reality of the ADL should be very obvious
to you, but I'll actually grab this, which
is prop with there's plenty more for you
to find, but this is all you need
to know, really.
I mean, I shouldn't say it like that.
There's always more. But this if you if
you this would be if once you saw
this, it answers the question.
The true nature of the ADL and how
it spies on Americans for Israel. It's very
clear. Good documentary to watch or interview about
the documentary with James Lee.
But so I don't disagree. ADL is a
very problematic thing. Do I think Elon cares
about that? No. I don't. And that's what
I said. Well, that's interesting turn. Do do
you buy it?
Most people said no. And then I saw,
oh, okay. Now it makes sense. Because almost
immediately, the ADL is caved under pressure from
conservatives and removed
Turning Point from its glossary.
Oh, I see. So it was a little
give and take game. So you guys could
all pretend like you're working. Oh, we're fighting
the bad guys, and all you did was
agree that that was gonna be taken off
because it's in Israel's interest to take it
off because now it's working very directly with
them. Weird how those things work. Now it
all kinda makes sense. Right? The game of
pushing back, acting like we're separating
so they could say the words out loud
even though the ADL is still working with
Twitter and even though it's still censoring and
you know, the same old game, guys. But
Nick Sorter gave you the flashlight and the
breaking sign, so it must be true. Right?
Weird.
Well, I simply said after Cash posted this,
meet meet the new boss, same as the
old boss because we're just referencing what we
already talked about. Even the wiki even WikiLeaks
shared this. $7,000
per post. Israel paying undisclosed US influencers amid
Gaza backlash. Okay. So if the Israeli government
is quite literally on record, he's on video
saying this, paying them $7,000
per post
to propagandize on this platform for Israel,
you might even wanna argue that the ADL
might not even matter anymore. I mean, either
way, I don't believe they're cutting ties. My
reality is if you understand what the ADL
is doing, it's what this person is doing
right here in one way or another. So,
at the same dynamic, and they're all a
part of this.
And on Twitter,
you've seen censorship. I just this is the
one I saw today. Israel exposed randomly had
a blue check removed.
Maybe that's a glitch. Maybe it'll come back
today, tomorrow. Who knows? Doesn't look like it.
They're paying for it. So who who you
know, the funny idea. Like, this is just,
I think, about
slowly
suppressing downgrading. It gives them a justification to
suppress their content because they were very influential.
They still are.
Nick Cleveland Stout points out that a new
firm now I believe he misused the term
foreign agent
because I can't find as far as I
could tell, there's no foreign registration for this.
Nonetheless, this person looks like he's from a
different country possibly, so I don't know. It
could be a misunderstanding of what that means.
Or maybe I'm wrong. Look for yourself. But
he says this new firm was just registered
as a foreign agent of Israel. I think
what it means is working for the government,
which I argue should be the same difference.
But from my research,
the group showed faith by works has not
technically been registered with the US government under
the FAR Foreign Agent Registration Act.
But, again, I could be wrong. It says
has been paid $325,000
for its work so far despite only registering
as a business in California on July 30.
The firm was hired by Israel to conduct,
quote, pro Israel outreach and marketing
to Christians.
The
look look who's hired it.
Foreign principle,
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Interesting.
The point is this stuff is literally everywhere,
guys. It's everywhere. Chris Menand points out Palantir
advisor, Jacob Helberg, went from this closed door
meeting with house speaker Mike Johnson
to a meeting with Netanyahu during a trip
to The United States two weeks later. His
husband, Keith Rabios, is on his left.
So you have this interchangeable
you know, the power structures of these from
one to the next. I mean, you have
to understand this is all interconnected.
One's influencing the other.
It says the meeting with Netanyahu was part
of an initiative to create a direct channel
of communication between policymakers in Israel and investors
and technological experts in The United States, all
of which, by the way, are completely immersed
in the US government. Palantir is part of
the US government at this point. You can't
deny that. And now they're having closed door
meetings with Israeli government.
I mean, it's just this is an obvious
issue.
If this was China, they would be losing
their minds.
Some of those present are among the close
circle of president Donald Trump and have or
will have senior positions in his administration.
Rubio's, for example Rabio, excuse me, belongs to
a group of investors and entrepreneurs known as
the PayPal mafia, a group of PayPal founders
and former employees that is considered to have
substantial influence in the administration's decisions making in
the areas of technology and the economy. And
as you're right, it's just naked influence peddling
on behalf of a foreign power.
Here's what Tucker Carlson recently put out. How
are we pretending like the whole world doesn't
see this right now? I think we all
start to see that.
War, such as it was with
during the twelve day
war, such as it was with Iran, The
US and Israel versus Iran,
bombing
on all sides.
During that short conflict,
IDF officers in the Pentagon,
foreign military officers in the Pentagon and by
the way, they're not the only foreign military
officers in the Pentagon, to be clear.
There are
NATO officers. They're from other country. British.
Yes. Yes. But not even close to the
same thing. As John Kiriakou and plenty of
others would very clearly point out, there's a
very different situation with the way and he'll
get into saying this, how it was abruptly
different, the way that they just kind of
feel they can have access to whatever they
want.
But understand that having, like, a e a
European u or, I mean, a a UN
presence or, you know, like he's talking about.
Those are very different things than the way
Israel is represented in this country.
But there are a bunch of Israeli Defense
Force officers in the Pentagon
that week.
And during that week,
ask anyone who works at the Pentagon,
they enraged
American Pentagon staff by just barging into meetings,
giving orders, making demands. Think about that. And
nobody did anything about it. I mean, how
I mean, okay. First and foremost,
question it. Right? Who knows? Tucker could be
wrong. He could have been misinformed.
But let's just say for sake of conversation,
based on everything else we know that that
seems very likely.
How does that not show you everything you
possibly need to know?
They're allowing foreign military to barge in and
order around people in the Pentagon.
I mean, is anybody else confused at all
about that? That should be the end of
the conversation in regard to whether or not
these people influence policy, which is the only
thing I'm actually saying.
It's in your face.
And all of these screaming propagandists out there
pretending to fight for Trump and America first
or Trump in a large way they are,
but they are not acting for this country's
interest. I think they know that.
How can a foreign military officer barge into
military headquarters, even if invited, but barge into
a meeting and start demanding, we want this,
we want that, you need to get on
this.
The more you allow that kind of deeply
unhealthy behavior, the more you're going to get.
And that's exactly
what has happened. Because of the weakness of
our leaders,
we have incited predators in a foreign country
to take advantage of us.
Oh, that's such an anti Israel thing. It's
not anti Israel at all.
It's a demand that the people whose job
it is, whose sacred duty it is to
defend and represent us are leaders, both at
the Pentagon
and all throughout the US government, that they
do that, that they stand up and defend
us against
all
potential threats, against all foreign countries the extent
they need to, and that they do not
prostrate themselves before a foreign nation. That's just
basic. Why have a government,
especially a strong government, if it's taking orders
from another weaker government? And that is the
state of play.
And it has been for a very long
time.
And they're not even pretending. That's just it's
incredible for him to be you know? Okay.
So you know my thoughts. I mean, as
we all should question it, but he's correct.
What he's saying is right. And he continues
to be you know, the point is we
should all hope these people end up,
like, let's just say he's been lying about
this and worked for the CIA, whatever you
think, and suddenly he goes, I wanna do
the right thing. I find it hard to
believe, but the point is that we should
hope and let it continue play out. Right?
Question it. Hold them accountable like you would
anybody else any other time. That's why it's
always the same. Ex consider everything. Question it
all. What he's saying is correct.
And it's just important to see that Tucker
Carlson, with one of the largest influence bases
in the conversation, is saying Israel is controlling
US policy, at least to some degree,
taking orders from. I mean, how else do
you make sense of that? That's why he's
being attacked right now. But question whether that's
some kind of, you know, like COVID overlap
to gain influence. You know, always. Question what
I'm saying, guys. Question everything. But my god.
So here
and flash back to this article again, the
show we did about,
Walls having the the
TeleMessage app on a signal app that was
relaying information back to Israel.
It's amazing a little coverage the story got.
It's just it's right on your face. TeleMessage
is an Israeli intelligence app. They were using
it, probably still are in the in the
White House, and he got they they made
it a signal gate app, that thing about
he's using signal and, it was about the
telemessage on it that was relaying the archives
to Israel.
It's just it's just outrageously in your face
today.
Netanyahu exposes Israel's global tech infiltration when he
talks about the
whether multiple points. One of them was about
the idea of the you have a piece
of Israel in your pocket with the phones.
But about everything else they were doing, they're
really demonstrating to you that they are able
to and are infiltrating
foreign technology,
proving it with this with this with this
show.
As this is an interesting overlap, in 2023
on in February, we discussed an Israeli company
that was caught manipulating at least 33 different
elections in the world
in 2023. Here are the articles. The secret
company apparently manipulates elections for money around the
world, many of which he claims were The
US, by the way.
A very prominent Israeli company.
This is the article all all over the
world, by the way, in German, all over.
Secret company manipulates elections worldwide, 2023.
Nobody cared. An Israeli company. In fact, the
guy that has direct connections to the Israeli
government. But who cares? Right? It must not
be true because it's about Israel. We don't
wanna be called racist.
We then cover this again, by the way.
2024.
The Israeli election interference and psychological
operation industrial complex. It was because this is
this article, also from 2023,
the hacking and disinformation team meddling in elections.
It's very clear that it goes well beyond
elections. It's all sorts of bullying tactics.
It's all right on the surface. They literally
have hidden cameras where they catch the guy.
In their interviewing,
Nothing happens. Not even some nobody even called
out Israel.
This has been going on a very long
time. So if you're worried about elections being
stolen, maybe we should go back from long
before Trump and long before Biden and understand
that this has been something else the entire
time.
Now we already played this in general. The
point is Larry Ellison telling you on top
of all of it that the world they're
building with their surveillance and Palantir and Israel,
everything else is a world where you will
be constantly watched because that's what they're doing.
Right? There's nowhere else around. They're gonna be
surveilling and enforcing the way they want the
world to be.
Now we're going to end with a segment
in regard to what's happening in Gaza and
how all this connects.
A great report from Greg Reese.
Now I'll probably just show you a couple
of these points, and we'll probably just end
with this.
Trump has set the deadline for Hamas
to agree to a deal for ending the
war in Gaza. Now recently, they came back
and said they agree to release all the
hostages, but they seek changes in the Gaza
plan. You know why you read this? It's
because it's exactly it's been their line from
the very beginning.
They've always been and the point is Israel
claims that's all they want. But now they're
saying, no. We don't want them if that
means we don't get this. And it shows
you the hostages are not the most important
thing to them. So I haven't got to
follow-up on what they say in response to
this. This happened right before I went live.
But the reality is that Trump comes out
and says, there's a deadline.
And if you don't do what we want
by then, all hell will break loose. Oh,
is that what it looks like to be
a peacemaker?
Threatening one side to do what they're told,
otherwise hell will break loose?
I mean, it's just in your face. We
should laugh at how stupid that is. And
you know what? He said that 17 times.
And he probably means it, but never all
that happens is they just go back to
the Israel keeps killing people, and nothing ever
changes because all hell break loose has already
happened. They're I mean, are you gonna rape
them more? Are you gonna bomb them more?
Yeah. Probably. But that's already happening.
So all Trump is saying is do what
you're told, accept your subjugation or we're gonna
make it even worse.
Acting like he's fighting for the Palestinians. So
and guess what? The deal is going to
be blown up by Israel like every other
time before. That'd be my guess. They'll never
gonna accept a deal that ends the situation
because they need the situation to drive them
what they're trying to finish right now, which
is quite obvious, which is the Gaza plan,
Right? The authoritarian,
technocratic, globalist plan that they're building that all
the fake patriots seem to support.
And here's Israeli,
Prime Minister of Defense or Minister of Defense,
excuse me. The IDF has completed in recent
hours the capture of the Nazarim axis up
to the Gaza coast, effectively dividing Gaza between
the North and the South. This is from
the first. This tight this tightens in the
encirclement
around the city, and anyone leaving south will
be required to pass through IDF inspection checkpoints,
maybe get raped and tortured and shot. You
know, never know. This is the last opportunity
for Gaza, he says, Gaza residents who wish
to do to do so, to move south.
Right?
Leave the terrorists isolated.
Those who remain will be considered terrorists.
Right. Okay. So let's we're pretending still that
they're, you know, not being ethnically cleansed and
displaced. So they wanna stay. You can't if
you do your terrorist. That's not allowing somebody.
The reality is they're displacing people and moving
them out of the way. That was always
a crime. Trump's always been supporting of that.
Netanyahu's been always planning this. So all they're
simply telling you is we already did this.
Okay. So explain to me how you can
be in the middle of a deal for
something around this when they're in there bombing
and killing right now.
Separating people, displacing people, and they're trying to
make a deal with those pea I mean,
how how in the world does that even
make sense? Because there's none of this has
to do with the Palestinians in the mind
of Israel and Netanyahu.
They're a side prod a side element to
this. They're making an agreement between themselves and
the PA, which is themselves,
pretending like they're making a deal, and then
going, Hamas, you have to say yes.
Why? Why? Why you ask yourself why that
makes sense. If they're pretending they're dealing with
the PA, why are they going, but Hamas
has to agree? You mean the group that
you keep telling us you're gonna destroy?
Because they want this to blow up. They
want Hamas to say I mean, even when
Hamas says yes, they find a reason to
blow it up every time anyway.
It's a it's a game of creating the
allowance of why you can blame them for
what they have to do next.
It's been the whole time. It's not I
mean, I don't even explain this. I think
most of the world already sees this. The
government supporting it? No. You see it and
don't care anyway.
It's just this is what's so hard. This
is the thing that keeps me up.
The idea that you're failing these people every
single day. Every single day, there are people
that are starving and being tortured and everything.
And and they want you to think they're
the ones saving them. That's the special kind
of evil that we're talking about today.
Now, in regard to the flotilla, which we're
there's action, but it's still kinda sort of
up in the air. The inner Israel's intercepted
the well, it's sorry. I take that back.
There's more supposed to be happening, but in
regard to the one we've been highlighting, they
were taken hostage,
and they're being brought back to The United
States. Have you heard a word about that
from the government?
Israel intercepts boat headed to Gaza with humanitarian
aid.
That's a that's a crime, you know, just
like The US is doing to Venezuela, but
let's pretend like there's no overlap to making
that precedent. Well, here they were back on
the first. Greg Stoker, who was there, saying
their Israel Navy trying to spray us with
skunk water, which is the most disgusting mix
of sewage and other things that will get
you sick. They use it on Palestinians all
the time. It is I mean, in its
own right, it could be considered a chemical
weapon, and it is a violation of the
right rights at the very least. And they're
doing this in international waters just like The
US is doing.
Then they arrest them.
Now here's the crazy part. This is Ben
Gavir
laughing at them,
not even trying to hide his disdain for
people.
Israeli prime minister
Ben Gavir appears at the Ashdod Military port
on the second,
provoking kidnapped international peace activist, journalist, and flotilla
participants, calling them terrorists like Trump does, see
how much that overlaps, trying to send baby
formula to the Gaza people in Gaza.
Here he is, laughing at him.
Calling them terrorists.
Look.
I mean, guys.
Think about this. Think about what was crazy.
If he if he is calling them terrorists,
these are p what whatever you think about
their politics, call them lefty, whatever you think.
Pretty obvious they're not terrorists. These are people
they don't like, disagree with, but he's calling
them terrorists, which just, as always, the Zionist
way about it lets the cat out of
the bag. If he's calling them terrorists and
he's calling those people over there, maybe he's
calling anybody terrorist he doesn't like and then
killing them all, sort of like Trump is
doing right now.
Kinda hard to miss that point.
These are Americans. These are journalists and people
from other parts of the world, all of
which matter,
And they don't care. Not only do they
not care, they know they can get away
with it. Let's not forget there's an American
child,
teen rather, who has been held in Israel
for over seven months. He's an American citizen,
third generation, born in Florida, who is still
in prison in Israel. Trump, Rubio, Peg Seth,
Bondi, Cash, Dan, none of them have said
a word because they're all cowards and don't
care about Americans where Israel's involved.
I don't know how you can deny that.
Here's Trump reporting and inside of his military
meeting
or it's being reported from that. The Trump
tells ministry brass, US faces an invasion from
within.
And you know why I think that's very
manipulative? Because I think he's trying to make
that float for the crowd that thinks he's
saving Israel for last,
because that is what's happening. The problem is
that he's pointing at the left.
He's using these things to keep you going
against yourselves.
They're destroying this country.
Columbia
expels Israel diplomats over the attack on the
flotilla,
and they're attacking him like he's a terrorist.
The The US Government's framing him like he's
the problem. Think about how inverted all this
is. You know you can see what's going
on. You have an inherent everyone understands good
and bad, guys. These people are wrong right
now. These people are bad. What they're doing
is wrong.
It's undeniable,
and you're supporting it if you support the
what these governments are doing. Now I'll end
with Greg Reese's clip about this. Watch it.
It's five minutes. It's important to understand.
But I'm gonna leave you here. Please watch
it out. I'll end with the clip of
the ending clips after this or ending, you
know,
graphic.
So make sure you pay stay tuned. You
know, most of this, you know, but it's
still great the way to see Greg
pulls us together.
Where this is going, guys, is really undeniable.
They're I mean, they're broadcasting it for you.
At this point, they're what here's what's crazy.
What they're saying they're doing was what they
screamed was impossible
and blood libel when this first well, post
October 7. Remember that?
We're never taking Gaza. Gaza's never on the
table. They're just we're just trying to save
the Palestinians. Now they're quite literally doing what
they always said was a lie. That's anti
Semitic.
You can't read it. You just can't miss
it. And, this is why most people see
it.
Please find some courage, some momentum.
Find some action in all this, guys. The
moment the world is behind you. We need
people of substance and influence to who have
some some,
ability to influence what people in power think
some people that can make decisions that might
actually stop what's happening.
I you know just maybe slow down the
genocide to it may you know to give
some ability to stop what's happening
Or just for, you know, in this country
alone,
recognize the constitutional crisis that we're in. Recognize
the people who are supporting a genocide and
telling you it's freedom. Recognize the people who
are telling you they're fighting globalism while creating
a globalist
building of technocratic dystopian cities and freedom cities
and all that pop up all over the
world. Recognize what's happening.
Recognize that you're not crazy. That I see
it. Everyone sees it. But they want you
to think you're alone. You're the only one
that doesn't get it. You see it.
Call out the partisan side. Call out any
side that doesn't agree with your values that
does not align with your principles,
regardless of what team it's on. Thank you
for being here. Thank you for continuing to
support this platform. I've got some really exciting
things upcoming. I really wanna I would love
to break some stuff right now, but it's
I wanna I prefer wait this I want
some things to flesh out a little bit
more, but what I can tell you on
on typical totally different topic, I got some
great stuff coming from Derek soon, some some
some great in-depth investigations.
I've got some more work coming out from
a few different people that you might not
have heard from. And Whitney and I are
talking about some really exciting stuff. There's a
lot more coming your way, guys. And I
just, you know, I feel like despite all
the constant attacks, they're still never stopping. I
mean, I don't even wanna get into half
the stuff that keeps going on when I
get sent. The bottom line is that we're
pushing even harder, and there's there's momentum that
they can't stop. Or they they could, and
they will try, but we're gonna keep pushing
regardless. And
I feel like the the momentum is because
you all out there see it.
Honesty, truth, integrity, honor, things that seem to
be completely non existent in the places that
seem to scream about them the most.
And you're changing it. The world is seeing
it. So thank you for being a part
of it. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
During the nineteen eighties, Benjamin
Netanyahu became good friends with American real estate
developers
Charles Kushner and Fred Trump.
Kushner's son, Jared, went on to marry Fred's
granddaughter,
Ivanka
Trump. Jared has been talking about the valuable
real estate in Gaza for a few years.
In Gaza's waterfront property, it could be, very
valuable. In May
2024,
the Jerusalem
Post publishes an image of Netanyahu's
Gaza 2035
vision.
In October
2024,
candidate Trump said that Gaza could be better
than Monaco. It could be better than Monaco.
It has the best location
in The Middle East, the best water, the
best everything. It's got it is the best.
I've said it for years. I mean, it
could be the most beautiful place. The weather,
the water,
the the whole thing, the climate,
it could be so beautiful.
On his inauguration
day, president Trump began discussing Gaza in terms
of valuable real estate. You know, Gaza is
interesting. It's a phenomenal location.
On the sea,
best weather. You know, everything's good. It's like
some beautiful things could be done with it,
but it's very interesting.
But some fantastic things could be done with
Gaza.
How do you see the future in governance
for Gaza?
Well, it depends. I can't imagine. You could
have well, you certainly can't have
the people that were there. Most of them
are dead.
On February 4, he referred to Gaza as
the Riviera Of The Middle East. Everybody I've
spoken to loves the idea of The United
States
owning that piece of land developing and creating
thousands of jobs with something that will be
magnificent. I don't wanna be cute. I don't
wanna be a wise guy, but the Riviera
Of The Middle East, this could be something
that could be so bad this could be
so magnificent.
On February 26,
Trump posted a bizarre AI video of Trump
Gaza. Trump Gaza shining bright, golden future, a
brand new light.
On April 7, Trump describes Gaza as incredible
oceanfront property. Well, you know how I feel
about the Gaza Strip. I think it's
an incredible piece of important real estate,
and I think it's something that
we would be involved in. But, you know,
having a peace force like The United States
there controlling and owning the Gaza Strip would
be a good thing. On July 14, Trump
referred to Israel's 2005
removal of its ground troops and settlements from
the Gaza Strip as one of the worst
real estate deals ever made. I call it
the Gaza Strip, one of the worst real
estate deals ever made. They gave up
the oceanfront property. One of the worst deals
ever made. On September 17,
Israeli finance minister Smotrich
claimed the deal to rebuild Gaza was on
Trump's desk and described it as a real
estate bonanza. There is a business plan built
by the most professional people, which is on
president Trump's
desk. How this thing turns into a real
estate, but as I'm doing, I'm not joking,
it pays for itself. By the way, I
started negotiations with the Americans, and I'm saying
this seriously now because I'm also demanding. After
all, we paid a lot of money for
this war, so we need to share. How
do we make percentages on land marketing later
in Gaza? But now no. No. No. Not
joking. The demolition phase.
The demolition phase, which is always the first
phase in urban renewal. We did. Now we
need to build.
Trump has chosen war criminal Tony Blair to
oversee the rebuilding of Gaza.
And on September 24, the Central Synagogue in
Manhattan
explained how the gods demand human blood for
humanity to survive.
The greatest lie humanity tells itself is that
we have outgrown human sacrifice.
We call it by different names now
and make our offering
to different gods.
We offer young men we call soldiers as
if the designation means that their mothers cry
less when they die.
We call masses of humanity
collateral damage
and turn our eyes away from the pictures
of their lifeless bodies as we sip our
morning coffee.
And the truth is, we don't do it
because we are heartless.
We do it because we believe that it
is necessary for the world to keep running.
We do it because we believe that the
gods whose favor we so desperately seek,
freedom, security,
prosperity,
flourishing,
that they demand blood as the price of
their favor.
We do it because we cannot see any
other choice.
When Abraham prepares to sacrifice Isaac, he is
just accepting the same bargain of blood we
still accept today,
that some need to die for the world
to flourish.
Greg Rees reporting.