It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 09/30/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Just a quick shout out to start. It
looks like Rumble is either censoring TLAB or
is having a struggle today and is not
allowing the stream to go through. It is
set up the straight the right way. It's
on the it's on the site. Streaming information
is set up properly, but it doesn't look
like it's actually starting. And every time if
you try to comment, it just says there's
an error. So let me know what you
guys are seeing. We'll put it up there
one way or another even if I stream
it out by itself tomorrow to make sure
it still goes out live. But let me
know if you see anybody else watching on
on, Rumble right now. Let me know if
you see
other things
streaming
that would tell me something. You know? It's
important to make sure we keep an eye
on stuff like this because yeah. You know?
There's
yeah. There's quite a few other people live
right now.
So worth pointing out.
Let me just show you guys real quick
just in case that matters for something in
the future.
It does appear that there's a lot of
people live.
Oh, look. Donald Trump's getting a a that
that's probably why. And I'm getting pushed off
the platform because they have they can't manage
the stream. That's I you know what? I'm
willing to bet you? Because this is streaming,
it looks like, and everyone's covering it. Donald
Trump signs executive order. Or it could just
be them streaming that. Anyway,
looks like there's a lot of people live.
Worth pointing out.
Oh, look at that. It even shows us
right here.
Oh, no. That's the old show. Anyway, not
wasting more time. So the point today, guys,
this is gonna be essentially a follow-up,
to what we were talking about the other
day with a few more important points. And
the reason I want this to be not
as long as I we could make it
and lots to get into, we have our
IMA panel that, if I can get that
in time and that is my plan, I'd
like to stream that live tonight. And that's
gonna be, like, you know, as we're doing
it live,
in regard to free speech. Very important conversation
with, you know, jam packed panel tonight. It's
gonna be a good one. Now if this
doesn't get done or just because of other
circumstances, it'll be put out tomorrow either way.
So keeping that in mind, let's get through
this, and let's talk about some of the
more important things we're gonna overlap. One of
the most important ones is,
well, actually, I shouldn't say it like that.
Honestly, the way I frame this today, I
would find the most important stuff to be
the stuff we start with. But the I
think what most people are gonna wanna see
is the follow-up in regard to the the
LDS Mormon Church shooter.
And we'll get into the real I'll show
you some points to start about how interesting
this story is and how many people have
been
blind,
like, deliberately misleading you or altering images to
put out false information. And we'll give you
the the the most accurate view we can
and even still argue that there's still an
there's still an open you know, you can't
necessarily prove
anything outside of what these points suggest.
Like, so if somebody had
a signed you know, like, they were part
of a republican group and that they were
registered as voting republican. That that way you
could argue is evidence, if not proof, that
they are actively voting. You could even then
say, maybe they maybe this year, they changed
their mind. That's not being frustrating. That's just
being objective. That's how we all have to
be.
Everyone's driving you to be subjective about everything
today because that benefits power structures. It benefits
people that like to manipulate you and use
that kind of subjective mindset to drive you
into all sorts of partisan
pigeon holes and, you know, fighting against each
other. But still thinking about that as we
go through it, you know, it's interesting to
see how both sides are playing this game,
and that's not a both sidesing issue. It's
partisans. It's a one issue thing. It's what
team sport politics people do. But we're gonna
get into some stuff to start that I
think is more important, and not necessarily the
incident, but the follow-up about whether or not.
That's that's my point. So I wanna start
with Israel and some overlapping points of the
ridiculous
yet again lie about the Gaza
deal that the Palestinian government agrees to, but
we have yet to hear from Hamas.
You know, there's
it's certain so what that means is Israel
and and Netanyahu
and Israel, United States, and Trump got in
a room and decided what they want, which
is the same thing they've offered and pulled
back, what, 15 times now that Hamas has
accepted almost every time? And
they go, hey, Palestinian Authority. What do you
think? You know, the group that is completely
if it it is a part of the
Israel dynamic over Gaza, and that is what
Palestinians will tell you. They're acting
Robert's written about many times. It is a
group that basically works for the interest of
Israel and United States on the ground, and
some of which is overlapped with Palestinian collaborators
and some which is not. But it's not
the Palestinian government the way that we I
mean, clearly, if they're negotiating the entire time
with Hamas, why would they be asking the
Palestinian Authority who has not been involved with
that to make the decision about what they
want? I mean, it's very clear to see.
Going over what that shows you and where
this is going to go, and it's just
the disgusting,
continual reality of where this was always going
to go and where you can quite literally
see that it is going and always was
going. The murder, the genocide, the displacement, the
ethnic cleansing of an entire population
of Palestinians.
And it's weird how little attention that's getting
in this conversation because of how many other
things are consuming the partisan conversation, which, again,
I don't think is even the majority of
people in this country. Like, the the left
right framing does not represent people anymore. I
think that's very clear. We're gonna talk about
Maxwell
and the very real possibility that she may
walk free, again, being missed by everybody in
the partisan game because we're focusing elsewhere or
they are, and that, ultimately,
the Trump indications have been pointing this way
the entire time. We're gonna talk about Trump's
new winning deal with Pfizer
and, you know, Trump RX, which is literally
what they're calling it at least so far
on Twitter and from Trump himself.
Because, you know, direct government drugs
sponsored by Pfizer is what we all called
for, isn't it? Hashtag winning. Of course, we're
gonna talk about the overlap of that with
the digital ID health point from May that
he made, but I think it's important to
reference this in the bigger conversation and where
this is obviously going. We're gonna talk about
authoritarianism,
George Galloway being detained, and the overlap in
this country, and what we're seeing, and in
Portland, and all of this stuff that we
should be focusing on that's getting drowned out
by a lot of the team sport politics
cheerleading. Right now, many of which are pulling
every punch they can to not focus on
what just happened.
Now we'll leave it there just to start,
so let's get into
we'd one more double check to see if
this is playing or not.
It does not appear to be.
You know, like, I have a sneaking suspicion
that this is something other than just
a glitch. But you guys can decide for
yourselves. I mean, let's be obvious. We've been
waiting for this other shoe to drop in
regard to the Rumble platform that is invested
with BlackRock, that is doing every single thing
that every other platform we've always seen as
a problem is doing, has the same choke
points, the same advertisers.
The only difference is that they're just not
pulling that punch.
It's it's very interesting not to say that
it ever will. Who knows?
But the obvious reasons that YouTube went that
direction, it's all in place. If you think
that just the partisan idea you realize how
many Republicans were were involved with the discussion?
Just, you know, it's it's just frustrating that
we can't see it that way, the nonpartisan
reality of damn near everything we're dealing with.
So let's start with the these points so
you can see them, but this will be
the latter part of the conversation.
So right off the gate right out of
the gate, what we were talking about yesterday
or day before yesterday, which as we framed
it, you know, that that this happens while
every partisan team sport politics really
do their best to use it for their
agenda.
Before we eat, just like with Robinson, which
is still technically up in the air right
now, he has not confessed, and the trial
has not ruled anything. And yet they're all,
we know lefty. And on top of that,
even though we can't prove lefty, that we
know it's him.
Just like they knew it was that guy
in the blue shirt. He was a boomer,
lefty. We knew it. And then, oh, now
we know this one. Or now we knew
this guy was not what he looked like.
It's just
painful to see how obvious this is and
why so many people still decide to just
stupidly play the game.
Now, the point and, again, we'll come back
to this in the in the latter half,
is that this guy was identified by New
York Post originally, and it turns out to
be the case so far with all the
information we can see. And it obviously did
not look like a lefty. Hunting gear with
camo, fishing, hunting, you know, all the different
you know? But, again, what I say, well,
we can't prove that just like we can't
prove a guy with a mask living with
a trans person is necessarily
left
even, like, ideologically,
let alone in some kind of left leaning
organization, which they would call terrorist domestic terrorism.
That's just being objective. I can argue that
clearly points in a in a direction, but
this,
it was interesting to watch. They came out
screening about how we knew it was an
attack on Christianity except it was a Mormon
church. And frustratingly, we'll go to we'll get
to it in a minute. The the weird
response to that is so frustrating. Look. You
could disagree with me. You can argue that
you think it's the same as Christianity, which
I don't even know how that makes sense
to people. It it is. It's not Christianity.
It's something different. It's Mormonism. If you believe
they and that they believe in Jesus Christ,
and this is not a religious thing, it's
about making factual points here, does not therefore
make that Christianity. You could argue there's overlaps.
It's all nuance. My point was not about
good versus bad. It's just to make an
obvious point, not about whether one you know,
it's about the people in the partisan field
who came out and lurched into the conversation
because they saw that it was something they
could use and probably didn't even realize it
wasn't a Mormon jerk because the original reports
were simply were misidentifying
it. And so they just did their usual
partisan nonsense, and they said crack attack on
Christianity, and then tried to make, oh, well,
it's the same thing. And then most of
their audience were like, no. It's not. Now
it's not about good or bad, at least
in my perspective. You can decide what you
think about it. It's just a factual difference
about the Godhead, about the Trinity, about about
beliefs, like, that humans can become gods in
the afterlife. I don't know how anybody can
reconcile those two things. Not good or bad,
just different. And so that point was important
to me because it showed you they immediately
came out and said, Christian, tackle Christianity. And
without even at a point we hadn't even
gotten this guy's name yet. People like Laura
Loomer were saying, we Muslims attacking Christians, and
they hate Jews.
Okay. And then it turned out to be
a white guy, likely Maga, who attacked a
Mormon church that had nothing to do with
Muslims at all. But yet
look at her posts. 10,000,000 views. I mean,
this is just because I well, you you
can decide why in a completely manipulated field
that we're in. But that's the point that
we have to all recognize.
That's maybe you can even argue it's not
even all of them. It's just a small
percentage of the team's work. Whatever. These are
largely influential partisans, and it was Betty Johnson,
Alex Jones,
Nick Sorter,
Fektor, f I mean, all of the usual
suspects without even blinking came out and screamed
the narrative before it even came out. Now
what are they doing? Now well, before we
can get to that, there's dispute.
People arguing that this is an altered picture,
and I did my best to prove one
way or the other.
And just so you know, just showing the
ones that are the clear, this is the
archive version directly back to the original Facebook
picture. You can prove it's still public right
now despite people lying about that. And the
fact that from my research,
it does appear to be the version without
it that appears to be the one that
demonstrates as manipulated
according to multiple things that I've looked at,
and we'll get to that in a minute.
Specifically, that's part of the part of the
picture. And even more humorously, whether you take
any one of these things at face value,
you shouldn't question at all, even
Twitter.
And it's funny because this cat turd guy
came out and said, derp, after somebody posted
the pictures. Right? Because, apparently, he's some kind
of AI algorithm in his mind, and he
can just physically tell right away whether it's
fake or not. Right? No. He just knew
it would work for what he wants to
say, so he yelled it to his billions
of followers.
That's how this tends to work. They didn't
double check that. They're gonna lean into what
works for them just like the same kind
of thing happens on the left. The same
team sport politics players do the same thing
in reverse. So when this happened, my thought
was, okay. Maybe it's well, maybe it is
that way. Maybe the lefties did this to
which would be not surprising at all. Just
like you guys would do the same thing
or you would lie about it in reverse.
That's how it always goes. But what's funny
is even Twitter. The photoshopped image is the
one on the left without the Trump imagery.
The photic point is you can trace it
back to the original post that is connected
to their family and it's not hard to
recognize. Now some people even then started going,
well, the FBI must have done that online
to make sure that they is that possible?
Of course it is. Do I think that
happened? No. Where's the evidence, first of all?
Secondarily, everything else kinds to counter that. The
problem is that you could always go, but
maybe this. But that's not what they're doing.
They're saying it was this. If it's if
it's that, then it must be the left
lied about it because we know that it's
only the left that ever does anything.
Some of those people are real, by the
way. But I don't think I think it's
mostly self serving. But the funny thing is
is he posted this and got all these
views on it, then people that try to
point out the problem
get basically nothing,
which is, you know, despite having followed my
thing point every time. 70 something however many
thousand followers we have, and you're gonna tell
me that we get 800 views? You know,
it's just that there's a clear manipulation going
on. But either way, it's important to see.
Now we're gonna come back to that. There's
much more to get into around the nuance
around this and what people are saying and
people like The Quartering who have made all
these extreme claims, like, we know it's the
left and we and here now they're trying
to cover it up, and now he deleted
all of those things and pretended like it
didn't happen. Very honest work out there. Now
in no way, shape, or form would I
deem him a journalist.
Either way, he's they report on these things.
They're they're a aggregator of information like a
lot of people are, and
they delete it and move forward. Now I
can't speak to what he might be saying
on all of his live shows. Maybe he's
going, I'm so sorry. I made a mistake.
I highly doubt that. Either way, deleting it
and the argument at the beginning was, we
know it's a lefty. Another lefty terrorist. Oh,
okay. What oh, the flags. That must have
been planted. That's the only make thing that
makes sense. Oh, look. He's got a sign
on his house, but it's above a stop
sign. That means stop Trump. We know it.
None of that seems to be panning out,
which is why they deleted
it all. Isn't this just insane where we
are? And it's not that it's like a
couple of fringe idiots online, guys. These are,
like, the most prominent people in the entire
political conversation
on the right at this point. Just like,
by the way, the most prominent people in
the conversation on the left were the ones
screaming down your throat about COVID nineteen. Isn't
it funny how this always seems to be
the case? And does that look like both
sides being an issue? Or does that look
like identifying an obvious, very alarming problem that
has seemed to have infested the team sport
politics on both sides of the paradigm? Which
shows you it's a government problem. I'd like
to think that's pretty clear. But as we're
being suppressed on these platforms, maybe nobody's gonna
hear it. You know? It's how it tends
to go.
Let's start with some Israel points that I
don't want you guys to miss.
Again, in case you forgot, your daily reminder
that this third generation American citizen has now
been held illegally in an Israeli prison for
over seven months, and no one in this
supposed America First administration has said a word.
Not Donald Trump, not Marco Rubio, not Pam
Bondi, not Cash Patel, not Dan Bongino, not
Hegseth, not Pacet. Not any you go down
the list of all these pretend America First
Patriots.
Where are they? This is a guy born
in Florida.
This is not some game where you're playing.
This is a real I mean, wait a
minute. I shouldn't even say it like that.
In your minds, what constitutes some kind of
a real American? But on top of that,
people like Loomer and the rest have already
argued that whether you're born here or not
does not make you a real American. It's
about whether you adhere to our ideals and
our ideas about what it is, meaning you're
just like the left, by the way.
But we'll bring this up as often as
possible to make sure we don't forget that
this is the one of many points that
alone show you the reality of what's going
on. There's no way you misunderstand this. There's
not some nuance. He wasn't doing it. He
was in West Bank with his family, visiting
his family.
Also showing you that there's lots of overlap
these places despite them telling you it's a
bunch of medieval terrorists and caves or however
they want you to think about this picture.
That child is still still in Israel right
now.
Lost a bunch of weight, dealing with all
sorts of diseases in their disgusting torture prisons,
but nobody seems to care,
at least where it matters.
American students are now being blocked from enrollment
if they refuse to watch Israeli propaganda.
Nothing new there. Northwestern students blocked from enrollment
after refusing controversial antisemitism
training.
Regardless of what you think the training is,
this idea that you before you can be
enrolled, you have to align with certain viewpoints.
This sure sounds like the way we always
thought college would go. Right?
Even right before this, the point was, like,
even the protest, aren't we supposed to be
in a place where this is what we
what we cultivate?
No matter what the ideas, the idea you
can explore ideas, even things that seem radical.
It's words, it's speech, it's ideas. People can
study Nazism in college, apparently not today, because
apparently that means you're a Nazi. The point
is it's about education.
And maybe it could mean that, but at
what point did we argue that words were
violence, that ideas were violence?
Isn't that exactly what the right was saying
about the left? Yes. It was, and here
we are.
Same old point, guys. Doesn't get any more
any more less important the day the more
the days go on. Well, the Palestinian government,
as we're being reported,
supports Hamas' plan or Trump's plan to end
the war.
I mean, it's this why this is so
insulting to anybody with two brain cells to
rub together is that if you've watched even
half the point so far, if you've watched
even, you know, just even the surface level
conversation, you know that they have repeatedly
done everything they can to stop this from
happening. We know that on the ninth and
the 10/10/2023,
Israel turned down two deals for a full
exchange because they wanted to do their war
first. That was reported by everybody.
Fact, I can even still show you this
one because it pops up. This is e
Canadian.
This is, CB, what is it? CBC?
And this is an interview with Israeli representatives.
Defeating Hamas is priority. Everything
else is secondary.
And that he directly talks about the hostages.
No. No. That's afterward. We gotta go raid
a Hamas first.
And that's where we are now. Right? But
even still pretending like we gotta get the
hostage back. They've turned down offers to bring
them back over and over. Blinken was caught
every other day going, it's up to Hamas.
Then Hamas goes, okay. And they go, no,
Israel.
You know, why haven't they framed that? Hamas
did something or you know, the argument always
became Hamas ruined the deal even though they
accepted the deal and then Israel goes, never
mind. Over and over and over. And I
don't mind even being hyperbolic. That's literally what
happens. Or they bomb something and blame something
else, or they continue to deviate from the
plan, or rather from what they argued they
wanted to do. Donald Trump and prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday they've agreed to a
plan to end the war in Gaza. You
know, the same old thing over and over
and over that they've already offered, that Hamas
has already agreed to, that they and every
time they add something or, most importantly, actually,
when they argued, even Hamas was like, fine.
We will accept that one we were not
agreeing to. We will remove ourselves. We will
no longer be involved.
And then Israel said no, and then twice,
Israel and The US added that bullet point
back. How do you misunderstand that? We covered
this live on the show. Meaning that they
you they kept Hamas being in the process
because then they could use that to point
at why they wouldn't accept it even though
they were the ones that put it together.
You realize half these times, Hamas is not
even at the table. They do this like
like this example. They act like we all
agree, and then they go, we hope Hamas
agrees wherever they are, even though the entire
point is about negotiation with Hamas. But Netanyahu's
stance always been that we have to kill
all of Hamas before we can make any
deal. Do you realize how silly and contradictory
that is? That circle of logic doesn't even
make sense. It's not even logic. It doesn't
even connect. How can you make a deal
with Hamas if they're the ones that need
to be destroyed before you can make a
deal? We've been pointing this out from the
very beginning.
So they made a deal, and it's unclear
whether Hamas will accept the terms. The title
literally says Palestinian government supports the plan.
Have you been negotiating with the Palestinian Authority
the whole time? No. They haven't
you see how silly this is? It's this
is AP deliberately misrepresenting
this to make it look like we all
agree. And then when it inevitably doesn't happen,
when they blame Hamas, when even though they'll
likely accept it, they'll say
it's because of Hamas.
Everyone agreed, and then they said no, making
it sound like they said yes, then they
pulled back at the last second, which is
not what's happening.
Now it says the plan has been presented
to Hamas, which is reviewing it in good
faith,
an official told AP.
So the point every time is that they
almost every time which it's mattered, they have
agreed, or they point to the fact that
what like, for example, the main phase over
Biden to Trump,
all they had to do was keep going
into the second phase. That's all they had
to do. The first step was to bring
all the hostages back. What did Netanyahu do?
He said no. Hamas didn't accept the thing
we inserted in the middle of the two
phase deal,
which is not even part of the legal
reality of that. You can't just make up
new points. That's what he did.
But terrorism, you know, that's why we can
do what we want. Oh, of course, it
all makes sense.
Palestinian Authority welcomed the announcement and pledged to
implement reforms in order to return to Gaza
and potentially clear the way for the establishment
of Palestinian state. Except the only little sticky
part is that it doesn't include the Palestinians.
You can sure as hell call it a
Palestinian state and then bring people who you
want in there. Won't be Palestine. Won't be
the Palestinian people. They're literally ethnically cleansing them.
They're literally moving them out of the way.
So if that if Israel's telling you they're
all the problem, bombing them, corralling them, why
would they then let them back into a
place that they would it's the current reality.
This is a setup. It is not what's
I mean, this is clearly something
they're trying to make you think they want
peace, and the only thing stopping it are
the evil Palestinians. They say Hamas, but they
mean every single one of them, which I
make clear with every action they take.
It says the Palestinian Authority is led by
rivals of Hamas and currently administrators, parts of
the Israeli occupied government. Right. It's not part
of the Palestinian government. It is a construct
created to make it look like the Palestinians
are ruling themselves. It is an Israeli apparatus.
It is they are literally most I mean,
like Robert would tell you, people that are
collaborators.
That are working with the occupation
because it benefits
them. Right? They don't starve to death. Their
children their and their their families don't get
raped and tortured sometimes.
And so they collaborate.
And they treat they treat this like the
government, and then PA actively enforces Israel's engagement.
Look at every situation where it comes tense.
The Palestinian Authority will be on the ground
checking the Palestinian people.
It's not about right and wrong. It's about
whatever Israel wants, and they're half the time
are the ones that take the blame. This
is a a setup. An error. I'll also
grab this real quick.
This is the one I often grab because
the title is very clear. You can watch
it. He he's written pretty plenty of articles.
Palestinian Authority does Israel's dirty work, one killed
in clashes.
It's an article from Robert back in 2022.
All started on October 7, didn't
it?
So quickly just update you on that.
Is and this is one thing that was
in the in the midst of all this.
Prime minister Netanyahu apologizes to Cutter for the
airstrike while Trump says he's close to the
deal.
Right. I'm so sorry we murdered your half
your your government. I'm so sorry that we
killed all the civilians in the in the
building because we wanted to. My bad.
Like, do you think he means that if
even if he does? What does that change?
So you're allowed to go, I apologize for
my massive war crime?
I guess they I guess that's what everybody
else can do too. Right?
This is just insulting to your intelligence. They
did this very deliberately, and they they praised
it, and they still say it's a good
well, I'm sorry. Let's see if that'll let
people think for this moment that we're the
good guy. Good luck.
Have Trump and Netanyahu really agreed to the
Gaza peace plan? Now it says after meeting
with Israel this is from today. With with
Netanyahu on Monday, US president Donald Trump said
the leaders were close to achieving a peace
deal. He says at the very least, at
a minimum, very close.
Okay?
That's such a that's not like a at
a couple of inches or, like, you know,
a day away. Whatever what mean at the
very minimum, we're there. Almost like he's just
he his speech is just always like that.
It's worth making fun of, to be honest.
He outlined his new 20 plan.
20 plan. He realized it was simply this
could end. A 20 plan guarantees
any one of those points could be the
the point of contention. We're almost there, but
they didn't do the right thing at the
right time for this nineteenth point. Then now
back to the old way, which is what
they do every single
time. The mil it says, diplomatic
sources. Oh, and it but it says, 20
plan to end the war in Gaza and
secure the release of Israeli captives still being
held in Palestinian territory. Funny how we never
talk about the way, way, way, way more
people being held in Israel for
some people some people decades
now. They a child was released
during this process
who came out an adult.
Said that the wrong way. Basically, he was
taken way before October 7. He spent decades
in prison and somehow managed to be released
as a as an
adult. Never charged the crime. Not once. I
mean, guys, it's so frustrating we have to
go through all this. Look at the ongoing
documentation going back decades from the UN, from
every human rights group, including Beth Seelhem.
Every single one of them will show you
this ongoing story of rape and torture and
human shields and everything they've been pointing at
everybody else about. Only in the last year
and a half has it really become obvious
to the majority of the world.
Think about how long we've been lied to
about this.
And they're simply saying,
the Palestinians,
right, have to release the people they're holding,
not anything else. So even if this goes
through, they're still going to keep all of
the, what, 10,000 people they have held in
judicial prisons with no release.
Let's not forget,
American citizen is currently there. Third generation American
citizen, still trapped.
They won't nobody seems to care.
Now it says, thank you. Trump's Trump thanks
Netanyahu for agreeing to the plan. So just
remember this. So when this inevitably goes a
different direction and Hamas agrees, then they go
now no. If that happens, you can't misunderstand
this. Netanyahu
agreed.
Thank you very much, everybody. This is a
big, big day. Big, beautiful day.
Stupid. Potentially, one of the greatest days in
the civilization.
That's what he actually said.
I mean, you just you you have to
ridicule something like this. It's hyperbolic
on in like, for an unnecessary sense. This
is a great monumental event.
One of the greatest days in civilization because
Netanyahu agreed to a plan that you guys
have yet to really do yet that the
other side hasn't agreed to yet. So halfway
agreement to a plan that hasn't happened yet
is the biggest moment in civilization. It's just
silly.
But that's that's what they do. It's very,
very obvious that it's projecting. And then you
get the Knicks orders and Benny Johnson to
go, oh my god. This is the best
deal I've ever seen in my life. The
best UN speech I've ever seen. Trump made
a sound with his chair today. It was
the coolest sound I've ever heard in my
life. That's how dumb this is. The point,
clearly,
is that this is a halfway there deal
that is probably going to stop. And it
says, I'm not just talking about Gaza. Gaza's
one thing. We're talking about much beyond Gaza.
Okay. So the globalist greater Israel plan. I
see. The whole deal, everything getting solved. It's
called the peace plan. Or it's called peace
in The Middle East.
Everything getting solved. Everything?
Just like that? Really, what you're saying is
we're gonna decide what everybody gets, and then
we're gonna pretend that that solves every problem.
Prime minister Netanyahu and I have just concluded
an important meeting on many vital issues. Oh,
the two of you alone? Yeah. That's a
sounds like a great deal that everyone agrees
on. Right? Includes Iran, trade, expansion, Abraham Accords.
Why do they get to decide
about everybody else?
Iran?
What is so Israel and United States get
to go and close room deal, make an
agreement about what happens to Iran? Just it's
just silly. And it says,
but most importantly, we discuss how to end
the war in Gaza. Yeah. Yeah. That'd be
very simple. You could just stop murdering everybody
and says, but it's just a part of
the bigger picture.
He's it's almost like he's minimizing the the
most obvious, longest, most dis destructive,
most deadly genocide in a context of the
size, how many people, the size of the
population, the size of the bombs, the intensity
of the short period of time. There's no
comparing this to anything I've ever heard of.
I I with the amount of bombs, there's
nothing that's ever been possible, I argue, until
this point.
And he says that's just one part of
it. God is just a small little thing.
That's just a poor gonna put that's a
small thing to put to bed, and it's
over.
And he says, which,
he goes on to say, where was I?
There it is. The prime minister, you know,
just to conclude the important meeting.
We discussed how to end the war, but
it's just a part of a bigger picture.
And the peace in The Middle East, let's
just call it the peace in the Middle
East plan. He says, under the plan, Arab
and Muslim countries have committed,
and in writing, in many cases,
okay, so not all of them then, to
demilitarize Gaza. That if that and that's quickly.
So, again, if you end up in a
position where Palestinians don't have self determination, this
is a deal for Israel, period, which has
always been the case. They act like this
is somehow in the benefit of Palestinians. It's
not. They're not getting anything other than a
new location to be controlled in, if that's
what even happens.
Demilitarize?
It says decommission the military capabilities of Hamas
and all other terror terror organizations.
So, apparently, also just the left in this
country or whatever they broadly mean. I'm making
that point for a reason. It means whatever
they want it to mean. And it says
do that immediately. We're relying on the countries
to deal with Hamas.
What is he even talking about? You mean,
so Israel failed in doing so? I thought
they've been succeeding, and I thought that was
the whole point. No. They've been accidentally killing
all their own people accidentally.
No. This is this is insane to go
now we're just letting everybody else has to
deal with this problem. And And it says,
and I'm hearing that Hamas wants to get
this done too. It's a good thing. Okay.
So Hamas, that you just told us, hasn't
responded. What does that mean? That's Trump's usual
BS. Saying the thing that isn't true since
Hamas hasn't responded and they're looking at it
as we speak, but he already said, I
hear that they're gonna because he wants you
to say that. He wants you to think
that. Then when it happens, they go, did
they already respond? No. They didn't. That's Trump
lying as usual, just like Biden lies as
usual.
But they have to deal with it. So,
inevitably, when nobody else does what they're doing,
which is murder everybody, they're gonna claim that
now we have to Either way you look
at it, this is going to rationalize the
same things they're already doing. It's like Trump's
last lie, the so called deal of the
century that Robert called the steal of the
century. Here's our interview about it. It's where
I got the picture from today. It's the
one I used before. The steal of the
century.
It's literally a a deal that he called
the two state solution, which all it did
was enshrine the current reality that they had
before that.
That's all he did. He just literally wrote
a plan that allowed a few variations that
allowed them to be controlled by Israel, and
they say, hey. Peace.
And they said no. And they said, wow.
Terrorists.
Typical.
And destroy all terror infrastructure, they write, which
apparently means every building in the entire area,
including the tunnels, weapons, production facilities, most of
which Israel built in the most earnest way.
There's lots of tunnels they did not. But
let's understand as I've proven many times, even
Time magazine wrote about this, Israel is aware
of a lot of these tunnels that go
back and forth and facilitates that process to
use it as justification to be able to
continue to target them and profits from it.
There's collaborate I mean, guys, this is public
information. Like, everything else they claim is blood
libel and not true.
And it says,
there's a lot of production facilities that we're
destroying.
Yeah. Like, you know, normal human civilian infrastructure
that they're destroying. It's also help it it
it'll also help train local police forces.
Great. In the area that we're discussing. So
Israel trained forces, Israel controlled area, Israel chosen
population,
Israel chosen government.
Freedom. Right? Sir, sounds like it. So you
get a group that's been justif like, on
not, who has been verifiably committing genocide,
and we let them decide what happens to
the people that they're genociding.
You realize this is not even debatable anymore.
There's every single genocidal expert in the world
that has any standing is going, this is
genocide. Even the ones that were once calling
Israel, they're the one on the right side.
Oh, and then it says, in particular
and in around Gaza, working with the new
transitional authority in in Gaza.
And here's the 20 port plan. 20 plan.
20 points. Gaza will become a deradicalized
terror free zone. Remember when they said remember
when they said they would deradicalize the Uighurs
and how they lost their minds?
There's plenty of human rights violations that took
place around that. I wouldn't call that genocide
just by definition, but what they did was
very full of obvious human rights violations to
people that were caught up in all of
that. But they'll do it because it's no
because they're they're it's like when they say
the left are terrorists or fascists,
and then the left calls them fascist, they
go, oh, you're inciting violence.
Okay. And then they go, but you just
did it. Well, they really are fascists. I
said, okay. Right? I think you're both fascists.
The point is that you can always make
that case. Well, they have to be deradicalized.
When they say it, they're they're it's ethnic
cleansing. When we do it, it's because they're
really radical.
Devault people have devolved the the two party
illusion
kills logic. It makes people children, it seems.
Gaza will be redeveloped to improve life for
its people. Yeah. That's where this comes in.
Right? The thing that they all pretend it
was fake, the absolutely real Gaza plan for
a technocratic control structure with digital IDs and
digital currency.
Yeah. That's really what's happening. It's not even
being hidden. War ends immediately on both sides
and agree with Israel to withdraw. Okay. What
about the West Bank, Trump? Are we pretending
that's not part of the same conversation?
So they're gonna cease fire with it. Just
like they had the cease fire with Gaza
last time, they were they just shifted into
murdering people in the West Bank and taking
more territory. What Trump just promised them, he
wouldn't allow. But it's happening already, and he
already agreed to it.
It's painful, guys.
All cap and then it goes on to
say with Israeli withdrawal to an agreed upon
slime and ceasefire, and all they do then
is they pop off one of their own
rockets and claim blame it on them, which
they've provably done before, and then they go,
oh, they broke the ceasefire.
All captives alive and deceased return within seventy
two hours.
Israel and, oh, you know what? How often
happens right there is they'll they'll pretend they
didn't return a certain body and claim a
violation and go back to bombing. That's happened
before too. Israel frees 250 Palestinian life sentence
prisoners, 1,700 detainees. Great. So out of the
10,000, we get a a sliver.
At least they're acknowledging it, but they I
mean, this entire time, they've been telling us
that's not the truth. Right? So they've had
250
we'll see that. They frame it as life
sentences. These people have never been charged with
a crime, guys.
That's covered and publicly acknowledged even by Israeli
government.
But they'll lie to you like they always
do. Hamas members who decommission their weapons get
amnesty or say oh, okay. So you're telling
me you're going to allow members of Hamas
to go somewhere else so Israel can continue
to pretend like it's an ongoing threat to
the world, which is probably what's gonna happen.
And I'm not saying that they shouldn't.
They're they're largely misrepresenting every Palestinian Hamas. I'm
just saying that they're setting this up in
a way that allows that to be the
case, the narrative rather. And it says full
humanitarian aid enters immediately.
Oh, so it always has been. They have
been blocking it the entire time. Gaza governed
temporarily by technocratic
Palestinian committee. I mean, for f's sake, it
literally says that.
Technocratic
Palestinian
committee.
Not Palestinians,
guys. The area. I promise you they're not
gonna allow Palestinians in this. And guess what?
It's gonna be run by Tony Blair. You
know, the guy
historically part of the WMD lie. And, you
know, a very clear good guy, not a
globalist technocrat at all. Right, Alex Jones?
Look at this.
How were we pretending that's not insane? And
weren't they all the one that shouted us
down for claiming that this deal was even
real, the technocratic plan?
Oh, you're fake news. Well, here we are.
It's actually what Trump has released as the
plan. Trump economic plan to rebuild Gaza with
global investment, job creation. Oh, so you're going
to continue to profit off of the ex
the ongoing genocide.
Special economic Zone, yeah, right out of the
sustainable deal or development goals. Also, the same
thing they did in Honduras, the same thing
they're doing in El Salvador, the same thing
they're doing out in the ocean. Guess what?
It's all funded by Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen,
and the rest of them. They're
Pernomos Capital.
I did an entire show almost specifically on
this funding mechanism. Pernomos Capital and the rapid
transition to a techno feudal state. And don't
forget the same backing, Pernomos Capital. And the
funding are the ones funding what is called
freedom cities.
So let's stop pretending like they're not the
same thing. They're literally the same thing with
the different terms that trick Americans.
Because all that's all they do is smack
an American flag on it and we're, yay,
freedom. Some of us, anyway.
That's what they're building, a technocratic
location
and a special development zone
with favorable trade terms. So this is gonna
be your CEO run technocratic. This will be
one of the flagships is what they're pushing
on the world, guys.
You know you can see this. Don't let
partisanship blind you to this. And it says,
no forced displacement. People are free to stay
or return leave or return. I will bet
my life.
That's not true.
100%.
Now that's my opinion. I'm just saying I
would be willing to bet almost anything. I
mean, just look at what we've seen so
far.
They're not going to allow Palestinians that they
deemed problematic to come back. Even though that's
what he say, they'll just have a caveat
that says, well, they were terrorists, though, and
that's not why the point is clear. You're
not making any distinction for people that Israel
doesn't want to be there. He's making it
sound like everyone can come back. Now it
says Hamas excluded from government, all weapons dismantled.
Okay. So if that happens, then are they
allowed to come back?
Regional partners guarantee Hamas's compliance. Right. So you're
gonna blame the other Muslim countries when they
don't do what they're told, which they won't
because most of those Muslim countries rather than
the governments don't represent the ideas of the
people. They're these co opted governments like Egypt
and UAE and Qatar, which ultimately are representing
outside interest, not the real interest of the
people on the ground, which is why they
always pretend to care about the Palestinians and
don't do anything about it. Or Jordan, for
that matter. Not to say the exact same
thing, but it's clear Jordan had a big
talk about West Bank, and they're not doing
anything.
Israel won't occupy Gaza. Withdrawals just to build
I mean, you realize how dumb this is?
You're already occupying Gaza, and this is a
continuation of that occupation. So it's just another
lie. But, see, they hope they can cement
these narratives one after another, and, eventually, people
look back and there's it's this Orwellian. And
maybe with their technocratic censorship dynamic, we won't
even know after a few more years that
it never even existed in the first place.
If Hamas rejects the plan, areas handed over
from the Israeli military to the ISF ISF
will proceed.
Oh, okay. So then if they don't agree,
you're just gonna do it anyway.
It's not hard to see where this goes.
Interfaith dialogue wants to promote values of tolerance
and peaceful coexistence, except that doesn't exist anywhere
in Israel. Ask the
Ethiopian Jews.
Ask anybody with a different skin color in
that country. Ask the Orthodox Jews who don't
believe in Zionism, but let's not pretend like
they're gonna acknowledge any of that. Reforms have
paved the way for Palestinian self determination and
statehood. My god. How can you even say
that?
It's insulting, guys.
Under Trump's plan, the technocratic leadership of Palestinians
unaffiliated with any political faction
will govern the day to day basis, but
the Palestinian leadership will be selected not by
the Palestinian people, but by a new
international body that would oversee the implementation of
the peace plan.
So probably collaborators, probably people that work for
the Palestinian Authority, or people that aren't even
Palestinian. They just say are now Palestinian because
they exist in what we'll deem the new
Palestine. Whatever.
I doubt they'll use that term, but I'm
just, you know, spitballing.
You know where this goes.
Yeah. And this is why I get this
so embarrassing.
It says,
Trump said the organization is called the Board
of Peace, which he will apparently be on.
Donald Trump is gonna be on the Board
of Peace deciding who gets to run this
country, not Palestinians.
Ball game about how we're gonna tell determination
and, you know, the law, legal international reality.
Doesn't matter because Trump's gonna make money. It
would be handed by a gentleman known as
Donald J. Trump. That's what he said. We'll
do it right. We'll have a board. Yeah.
A CEO board run country.
You can't I mean, you know you can
see these inter these
these overlapping agendas. It is happening in real
time. For the first time that I've ever
been doing this, I'm watching some of the
most large, long discussed things come into full
view and then literally start to overlap with
each other. And then all the long term
types who have always claimed to fight this
act like they don't see it, start pointing
anywhere else.
Hamas still needs to respond. Now make sense
of what all they just said and the
fact that Hamas needs to respond.
So there are many Palestinians who wish to
live in peace, he says. So I've seen
so many of them, and they have they
and they have support. As right this moment,
Israel's still cult bombing, killing, executing, torturing, murdering
right now.
But, yeah, but they want peace as they
run from tent to tent and get bombed
and starved and kept no water. But, yeah,
we we're fighting for them, aren't we? I
challenge the Palestinians to take responsibility for their
destiny, he says. How insane is that?
What exactly do you think they're gonna do,
Trump? What do you think they could have
done? You mean agree to the many other
deals you offered? They've done that, and you've
turned it down. You mean try to
petition the world to say we're being starved
to death? They've done that. Every human rights
group in the world is going, they are
nobody care. But it's on you to do
it. This is why people get radicalized.
Imagine standing there watching your mother get raped,
your family killed, you're starving to death, there's
no water, IDF laughing at you, and people
trying to give you food or trying to
shoot at you, and then Trump goes, it's
up to you. You're the one stopping it
from happening. Imagine what that does to someone's
psyche.
It's insane, guys. And he says, because that's
what we've given them. Right. Responsibility for their
own destiny?
Insane. We're giving them responsibility, he says, for
their own destiny. Fully con condemn and prohibit
terrorism and earn their way to a brighter
future.
So as you're being terrorized,
tortured, raped, murdered, starved, they're going, you're the
terrorist, and you have to denounce that before
we'll stop him from continuing to murder your
family.
They don't want that life that they've had,
he says. They've had a rough one with
a mosque.
Just lying.
Not I mean, anybody even quote barely paying
attention can see what Palestinians are actually. That's
not what they're doing. They don't want that.
They don't they do not want anything they're
offering
in regard to Trump and Israel. He says
if the Palestinian authority does not complete the
reforms that I laid out on my vision
by peace for 2020,
so he's simply using the old plan, which
was my entire point.
Trump went, oh, deal of the century. Right.
So all you're doing is enshrining the old
original problem and just calling it a new
thing. Pretty lazy.
He says if they don't, they'll only have
themselves to blame.
I mean,
it's hard to have enough words to describe
what we're talking about here. It's just overwhelmingly
disgusting.
And it's still New York Times just listing
the same thing in case you wanna see
it somewhere else, ever technocratic,
apolitical Palestinian committee. That's pretty obvious. Tony Blair
being overseeing the transition because that's what that's
not a globalist technocratic problem. Right, Jones? They're
the good guys. Right?
And here's,
Robert's discussion, him him and myself of this
back then. So you can hear him lay
out why this plan was already a fraud
when this first came back. And this is
07/05/2020.
Back, we should share that real quick.
Oh, I'll wait because that picture is pretty
close to the one that I'm using today.
And this one of the deal, the technocratic
transition, Gaza deal, peace deal. And then Max
Blumenthal comes in and says, well and this
is always what happened. I should say every
time, but very commonly.
In Hebrew, Netanyahu gave away the game.
The Gaza peace initiative was another deceptive ruse
to paint Hamas as rejectionists.
Israel has no intention of withdrawing troops from
Gaza and will not implement any part of
the plan in good faith. Right? So, like,
what Trump laid out, if you read through
the lines is, well, if they don't do
this, well, they're gonna stay where they are.
They're gonna take Gaza. That's what they're doing
right now. In Hebrew, he said prime minister
Netanyahu on his account at the end of
the visit to Washington says, quote, instead of
Hamas isolating us, we've turned the tables and
isolated it. Now the entire world is pressuring
Hamas to accept the conditions we set. The
release of all the hostages and the IDF
remains in the most of the strip. Does
that sound like what Trump said? No. He's
saying this to his people so they can
cheer because prime minister Netanyahu can always one
up on Trump, will always one up on
the American government. Look at how great it
is. That's what he's doing. And your government
sees that and still cowers. It doesn't say
a word.
I'll also not forget what they're capable of.
Right? Here's Benjamin Rubinstein saying only one side
has the weapons to do this, and it
wasn't
Hamas. That's right.
It's undeniable. The problem is that they hide
this by scooting off to one side and
act like they bombed a parking lot or
something, and they lied to everybody. You remember
the picture that we've captured, which a lot
of people saw, was where it really was,
scattered around the road as they bombed every
car trying to leave Israel.
Literally, the Hannibal directive as we know they've
initiated.
PVT says never forget how Zionist demons sprayed
their own people with 1,000 KG MK eight
four bombs and hellfire missiles, The US provides,
on October 7 and manufacture consent for genocide.
They admitted this, by the way, as anybody
paying attention already knows.
This and this came out as the con
confirmation of that even after we did the
show. This was June 2024
Or
recently.
This one still continues to blow my mind.
Video documents the moment Palestinian physician, doctor Marwan
Abdin, was shot in the head by an
Israeli
core quadcopter
through the window while on duty at Nassar
Hospital in Cajunas.
Shot in through the window while in the
hospital.
And she writes simply, this is not ordinary
evil. This is evil on a scale that
defies belief.
This is everywhere.
I mean, in fact,
since I bring this up every time,
you can look for yourself and look at
how many doctors have been publicly telling you
this. And this is probably a fraction of
the ones that are out there. All of
them. All of them. All of them telling
you
they're committing genocide.
Shooting children,
shooting doctors,
and that there's no Hamas insight.
Now this as well.
Kids dying of starvation, effectively, their body's consuming
their own organs.
What we give them to try to avoid
this, and this is a common you know,
there's this is something that's usually like, one
of the things that might be the best
in that circumstance,
high protein peanut butter paste. Right? We've been
told that we can't bring that in because
it's called a luxury.
That's serious. The Israeli government said, oh, you
can't bring in peanut butter. It's a luxury.
How exactly does that fall into the whole
Hamas
might you okay. They no. They're just starving
people because we know this already.
Dropsite news.
Jeffrey Epstein helped broker Israeli security agreement.
You already know this too. Jeffrey not this
specific point. He has a great job on
drop site news, but the point that the
general that this the overlap is there. This
is just more evidence and a great job
by drop site news to prove that this
is always going on. And it overlaps with
a big point that we always make, and
I'll show you in a second. Jeffrey Epstein
used his political network and financial resources to
help broker a security cooperation agreement between the
governments of Israel and Mongolia.
Definitely running long today.
According to a trove of leaked emails from
former Israeli prime minister, Hugh Barak, the new
set of emails between Barak and Epstein was
largely been ignored by the mainstream press, but
includes crucial new context on Epstein or, operations.
It's well known that Epstein has personal ties
to Israel, including senior political officials like Barack
and Ihud Olmert,
and that he donated to organizations like Friends
of the IDF. But Epstein's activities in Mongolia
show for the first time that he facilitated
a deal led to the security agreement between
Israel and other nations.
Now this is big because this is, like,
before the real big start up nation push
of Israel into the tech sector. It says
messages spanning from twenty thirteen to 2016
show intimate, oftentimes daily correspondence between the prime
minister of Israel and Epstein. It relates to
his role in the development of Israel's cyber
warfare industry.
The rise of Israel's cyber surveillance and weapons
industry has been one of the most significant
geopolitical developments in the past two decades, making
sophisticated
hacking tools available as turnkey packages
to police, military, around the world, almost always
with backdoors. So So you could argue this
game they play is that we're the we're
the cybersecurity.
Right? We're there to stop the bad guys.
What they're actually think of it like a
great gain of function in a digital sense.
They're well, there's too much overlap there for
other conversations, but the point is cyber surveillance,
cyber like, this is their like, the weapon
side of it. Right?
Offensive.
They're presenting things that are backdoor Trojan horse
things that we'll use for that. So it's
really a presentation of certain defense
which packages the offense.
You know, this is an easily proven conversation.
They gloat about this stuff.
And I'll I'll play that in a second,
in fact. But it says the spread of
a zero click exploits, which we've talked about.
Remember, that means the thing like an email,
for example, you don't even you don't you
don't even have to click on it. Just
the arrival of it into your convert into
your system. Or I mean, the point is
you don't have to engage with it. It's,
as it says,
zero click.
Exploits the the that that excuse me. The
spread of zero click exploits that require no
interaction from targets coupled with the proliferation of
web connected devices in homes. Meaning, your phone
is dead web connected instantaneously. All they need
to do is send it out to that
device. You don't need to engage with it.
That's where the world is. Think pager attacks,
guys.
And it says,
in homes, offices, and manufacturing facilities. See, they
could do that in devices that haven't even
been mailed out or used yet. Has transformed
what is possible for spy agencies and those
in in their orbit.
In the shadows of Israel's cyber boom was
Jeffrey Epstein, who exploited his network of political
and financial elites to help Barack and, ultimately,
the Israeli government itself
to increase the penetration
of Israel's spy tech firms into foreign countries.
Epstein actively supported the Israeli intelligence industry via
venture capital investments
and contributions to charitable organizations,
nongovernmental
entities that laid the foundation for official Israeli
security deal making under the guise of nongovernmental
when it couldn't be more so. It says
the
story of Israel's 2017
security agreement with Mongolia
is a window into the true nature
and scope of Epstein's operations.
Make sure you read this article.
I thought there's I think there's one point.
No. It might have been that. It's a
long article. There's a lot of good information
in here, but I just want you to
get to the premise, and we will include
it as always so you can read it
for yourself.
So, again, let's play this clip. I'm gonna
just like that opening clip with the I'm
gonna play this as often as possible. Why?
Because I think that this is something that
I get a weird amount of pushback from
people acting like I feel like this is
something that Israel
misjudged.
Right? The idea that they let this out,
I think, was something that they miscalculated
rather.
Gloating, usual hyper you know, hubris. But, again,
consider this yet again when Mossad admitted that
it creates front companies and conducts slaps all
around the world. But another additional point now
proving that not only do they do this,
but they they worked with Epstein to create
these channels before they then rolled out these
companies.
Have to consider this. I believe this is
already in place. How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
sell companies oversell companies who affect the supply
chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company.
We write the screenplay. Really quickly, think about
supply chains.
COVID nineteen overlap.
Right? The control of that. Or the idea
that other governments don't care about that? They're
literally admitting to you that they can use
fake companies within your country to manipulate the
supply chain in their favor?
And they don't care about that? I would
argue they very much care about that, but
they, for whatever reason, aren't able or aren't
willing to make it public.
Waste back to Israel,
shell companies over shell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
This is Mossad's old office.
Its motto from Proverbs twenty four six says
in so many words,
wage war through deception and trickery.
Kinda like the CIA smoke and mirrors,
which is what this operation was all about,
starting with those walkie talkies.
But walkie talkies are only worn in battle,
so Mossad began developing
a new device
that Hezbollah fighters would have in their pockets
all the time,
a pager.
Right. Except also was used by literally everybody
else, and she must be able to deduce
that.
I think we might actually be back up
on
yeah. Look at that. We're finally back up
on Rumble, but I'm sure that it's got
let me know in the chat whether it
was even, you know, probably just started halfway
through the middle. Right? Any case
so talking about Epstein and Maxwell. The overlap,
I think, is obviously very important to this.
So give you a quick update on this.
This is something that I think Quickly my
opinion about where this goes. I get the
very real sense
that this is going to happen, that she'll
be released.
And that almost that this was how Like,
remember when Trump comes out and says Democrat
hoax about the whole thing,
most of us were like, did he really
just say that? Like, after everything that even
he's insinuated?
Now I'm starting to go, okay. Maybe that
was on purpose.
The whole point is and, again, I find
it hard to believe that e that someone
like him would make themselves deliberately look stupid
to make it carry governments do it all
the time. They'd always rather look stoop you
know, incompetent than criminal in my opinion, but
it's hard to see for someone as narcissistic
as Trump. But
logically, it seems like that might have been
one of the possibilities to say, okay. This
is all a hoax. Then you open the
door for the appeal point. And so if
you right now because just quickly, they're he
she went in front of a judge. And
or or rather, well, Aubrey, you know, they're
seeking an appeal.
And they're deciding whether to get that appeal.
They decided yesterday or that they started, and
it could take weeks, you know, or days
depending on when you know, how long it
takes to deliberate.
Now should they come back and say, okay.
We're granting your appeal due to previous actions,
mostly the sweetheart deal?
Apparently, as I understand it, that would be
over. She walk out.
No appeal because it's I find this interesting
to think about. From a judge's perspective, you
know, they're supposed to engage with the principle
of it. Right? Okay. So does she have
a legal grounds for an appeal? You can't
then go, oh, but because of other things,
if she gets the appeal, that'll let her
walk free. I'd argue legally, you're not supposed
to consider that. You just go, does the
legal standing off the argue that she should
get an appeal in this case. And so
my point is if you really stood back,
you'd be like, well, that would get that
would the point is she wouldn't get an
appeal. She would be released because of preexisting
situations.
I think this seems like it was set
up. So you gave them the opening to
argue, he says it's a hoax. How can
I be in jail for trafficking? Just knowing
that that's not enough to actually overturn anything,
but it will be enough likely to start
an appeal. Then she gets to walk free.
I think there's a lot of logic there.
This is just completely my opinion. But this
is just the article supreme court to consider
Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal to reverse
sex trafficking conviction.
This is just a video where they're talking
about this. You can watch it. The Supreme
Court will decide Monday. That was, yeah, yesterday.
If Maxwell gets an appeal, if she wins,
she walks, no retrial because of Alex Acosta's
sweetheart deal with Jeffrey Epstein.
Stella points out if Josiah Maxwell walks, and
most likely she will, every one of us
will know without a shadow of a doubt.
Some of us will lie to ourselves, I
imagine. The sex crimes against our innocent children
has been committed by the people at the
very top of our government in this country
and beyond. Don't pretend and try to justify
your out your allegiance to any of these
people. All three branches of our government is
guilty, and there's no way to whitewash any
of it. That's what her argument is. It's
hard to think about that. And if this
goes forward and she walks out,
you know the people the the people that
would have been screaming the hardest about Epstein
will be suddenly telling you why it all
makes sense. Don't forget Newsmax
long, weirdly, started to argue months ago that
she was innocent,
that they might have misrepresented
that. See? Sometimes they let the the agenda
down a little too early. Now we'll come
back in a second to the overlap of
the other conversations, and you find it very
interesting when people like Nick Sorter, for example,
were last mentioning Epstein.
All charged up about how it's the most
important thing ever and then just stop talking
about
it. You can't misunderstand that, guys. Now, here's
what JD Vance was saying back then in
2021.
Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and
most powerful people were connected to a guy
who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring,
and then that guy died mysteriously in jail,
and now we just don't talk about
it? As Robert says, yes. We do. And
we always did. Right? Most people in this
field were always talking about this. He is
just creating it to a narrative.
And now he's doing the same thing.
As well as this overlap, I just this
is interesting to me for many reasons. Marjorie
Taylor Greene came out and said, I'm not
suicidal.
One of the happiest, healthiest people.
It seemed to rub people the wrong way,
I guess, but I came out and said,
no. You're just playing these playing into these
things just like the rest of you do.
A little less of the partisan game and
more of the effort for truth and transparency,
please, which you have been doing and I
support even though I suspect is purely opportunism.
Regardless, I support it. My point is,
are you really gonna pretend that her saying
what she's been saying is is, you know
I mean, it's certainly possible, but coming out
and going, oh, I'm not suicidal. Like, okay.
Candace Owens saying that. I I get that.
That makes sense to me even though I
don't necessarily trust it. But she's saying things
that are pretty pretty,
you know, it's ruffling feathers. People like me
are out here saying things that are, you
know, I I would I some I've said
it in the past.
That that's why because, you know, there's
with her, I just don't it just anyway,
you can decide for yourself. To me, it
feels like her trying to use the whole
I'm a victim game like partisans do. Yeah.
I get it. Rub people the wrong way,
I guess. My point was,
in this case,
Ted Cruz comes out and says, why do
crazy people
keep thinking the Jews
are trying to kill them?
Okay.
Well, she says she continued saying, I have
full faith in god and Jesus Christ, my
lord savior. As a sinner, I am only
saved through his grace and mercy. With that
said, if something happens to me, I will
ask you to find out which federal foreign
government or power people would be behind the
Santas Act.
Weird because, of course, you know, why could
that's what I mean. It's like it couldn't
be someone in this country. It just seems
like a very clearly political thing to make
it look like you're fighting the power. That's
what I think. Because remember, she's hardcore on
the, like, lefty terrorist right now. She's doing
the same thing. But it says not only
this issue, but because of the truth that
I'm speaking, okay. Notice the thing that's not
there. Right? Which I said to him. I
said, very clumsy, Ted Cruz. The issue? She
never once mentions Israel or the Jews.
So
why would you point her at why would
you point her at why would her points
about Epstein files and possibly threats of her
life
draw that response from you? Oops.
Like, like, that was very clumsy of him.
Either he wants to make you to make
that connection or he's just jumping the you
know, kind of like there's a missing gap
there and he's just filling it in to
make his point. Either way, she didn't mention
either of those things. You did. But you
could also stand back even further and go,
that's how this game is played.
He's on one side. She's on the other.
They make it out. You're the one doing
the wrong thing, and they're both playing you
into some false construct.
You know my opinion about government in general.
Consider that at the very least, while still
pointing out when any of them say something
that you find to be correct.
Now, in another example of of winning in
this country right now and the cheerleading of
these ridiculous people,
Nick Sorens is just in. President Trump is
set to announce the launch of Trump RX.
Okay? Yay. Which is a new website to
allow Americans to buy discounted drugs for cash,
which feels really strange to me in a
lot of ways. And especially if this is
in any way benefiting Trump himself or the
government,
this is fascism, guys. That's not not in
the tyrannical sense that you see on the
streets, but in the context of government and
corporate
entities merging together. That's one of the tenants
of fascism. Or you could argue communism. The
funny thing is they're very similar and people
don't wanna see that in their government.
And it says, this will cut out the
middleman and lower prices of drugs. And what's
interesting is you know how many companies are
gonna be very, very like, that's to me,
either these cut these people in, which we're
gonna see in a second, or it's not
really what it looks like. It says end
users can search for specific drugs, multiple manufacturers.
Okay. With political leanings as always. But it
says a deal with Pfizer
is expected.
Great.
So I said, this is what winning looks
like, guys. Can't you tell? Making a deal
with big pharma to get to get big
pharma drugs direct from the government? It's a
good thing. And partnering with a key with
with the very Pfizer
that all of Trump's base correctly called out
is a good thing, guys. If you question
this, you're not MAGA.
This is just wild to me.
And
Oh, that that this guy says, well, the
last time this clown mentioned Epstein was September
9.
Explain that.
Why would you stop calling it out? Because
Trump told you so.
These people are about the these are, you
know, the the equivalent of the children in
the room. It really is. They these they
don't have any concern for you, for the
outcome, or at least that's secondary to everything
that whatever Trump tells them to say that
day.
As well as the fact that this Eric
Daugherty just seems to be packaging, repeating whatever
else is. The same thing they're all doing.
Breaking, which is funny. I love don't you
love that? They all do red red light
breaking when it's hours after the other guy
said it and forty minutes you know, two
days after it was reported. Breaking news. Breaking
for what they want they're for what they're
saying. It's just a game, guys. It's all
it is. And I said, did you and
Nick on the on the other cheerleaders discuss
this post beforehand?
Who suggested that claiming a deal with Pfizer
was a good thing?
Do you have such a low opinion of
your followers?
Here's the actual post from Wall Street Journal.
Caroline Leavitt, happening today.
Another meeting with with Borla? You know, Pfizer
in the White House?
At what point is this gonna be some
40 chess move where he marches him off
to get arrested? Remember that last one where
he said he's a great guy and everybody
booed him and this and everyone's like, oh,
he just tricked him into saying things he
didn't wanna say.
Okay. Walk me through how this is a
continuation of that, please. The White House is
planning to unveil a direct to consumer website
American for Americans to buy drugs, dubbed TrumpRx.
And now he announces that Pfizer
plans to lower prices. Great. You can get
your COVID shots even lower because guess what?
That's still happening. We forget about that already.
Not even just self amplifying. Pfizer's Comirnaty
is already being used for the '20 twenty
five, twenty twenty six mRNA regular
shot. It's already being used. It's already out
there.
Available for everybody. Being forced by many places
and coerced by many places.
But don't worry. You get them cheaper now.
Hashtag winning.
Sasha Ladipova interview from 2023. How Pfizer and
the Department of Defense defrauded the public. Here's
a couple of important ones. Brooke Jackson interview,
the most recent, and you can watch all
the other ones down here. They usually pop
up from our first one to our second
or third, all of which are important when
Pfizer was caught lying to you and the
government, both sides of it, covered it up.
He and this is her last one with
Brooke Jackson. Meet the new boss, same as
the old boss.
Trump's no different, guys. Doing the same thing.
Also, let's not forget the Palantir Panopticon and
the Trump's new big tech led private health
tracking system. Remember he announced that?
Private health tracking system.
How are these things good things for anything
other than Trump being the one that does
it? If Biden was doing this, you'd all
be crying foul, rightly.
And here is Tim Hinkliffe pointing out what
he said back in May, and this is
important to hear.
Digital ID is a huge part of this,
and it's rolling out quietly from different angles.
That's how this tends to work. Boiling frog.
People aren't paying attention if they don't wanna
see it. But thanks to this announcement, health
care providers across the country will
also finally be able to kill the clipboard.
It's an expression that's used, capital
with a capital c, kill the clipboard.
Instead of filling out the same tedious paperwork
at every medical appointment, patients will simply be
able to grant their doctors access
to their records at the push of a
button. Just a button and you're all set,
and all the information the doctor needs will
be immediately
transmitted.
Now right there, we're talking about the doctor,
like a local doctor at your local city.
Right? Not not the the system.
Because this is what's so insane. They already
have all that data, guys. That's not secret.
That's why they you did the whole sharing
your data back to you game where they
acted like freedom, and we're showing you what
they have on you. Right? So in that
regard, then why wouldn't they just access the
system? And that because they want you to
feel like you're allowing them to look at
it. That's not what's happening. Maybe with your
doctor or nurse or, you know, your neighbor,
that yeah. That yeah. They required you, but
that's not what's happening right now. For every
other thing they're doing, as Larry Ellison's told
you, as Palantir's told you, as even Trump
and RFK have let out before, they have
collapsed. They've scooped it all up, allowed Israel
access to it, and they're training their models.
They have access to everything on you everywhere.
And all they're doing here is creating a
circumstance that makes you feel like you have
a choice,
but the real trick is digital ID because
that's what's required.
I'll I'll show you the actual document.
The system will be entirely
opt in, and there will be no centralized
government run database, which everyone is always concerned
about. I'm Yeah. Gee. I wonder why. I
love how he just laughs it off. And,
yeah, there will be. It's quite literally exactly
what it is despite. See, they love to
just say the other thing, and a bunch
of falling partisans go, yay. See? I told
you. And then even look into the actual
documentation.
Government run database, which everyone is always concerned
about. I'm I'm less concerned than anybody. I
say whatever it is, it is. Yeah. But
people Yeah. Yeah. Right. Who cares? Right? Who
cares if it's a problem? Who cares if
authoritarian centralized government? I don't really care. Glad
you said that out loud. At least we
know that, but you guys don't wanna care
about that. It's right there. People are very,
very concerned about the personal records. They wanna
keep them very quiet,
and that's their choice. I think, it's a
great thing because it will be. It'll be
absolutely quiet.
Quiet as they don't tell you they have
it or take it or manipulate. It's a
very weird way to say that. The doctors
and patients will always
remain in control.
The benefits to millions of Americans will be
enormous. We will say We realize right now
that's not the case. It's not the case
now. It wasn't the case before. It's not
with what they're building. I should these these
are just
this is a adult comfort blanket. Save time,
we'll save money, and most importantly, we'll save
lives. It's just gonna make people
live longer and be a lot healthier. I
think that's really what you're looking Right. Of
course, it is.
Well, as oh, here. I closed it.
Tim Hinkliffe
says,
kill the clipboard digital ID. And I'll show
you the document he shares right here. Trump
says it will be opt in, but the
HHS is already exploring how to encourage, require,
and even mandate in some instances, quote, a
single set of trusted digital identity credentials. Right.
It always starts like that. And they always
claim it's like that, where you can choose
to
be boxed out of your life. They did
the same thing with COVID nineteen, both sides.
So just your government, if you understand the
real picture. And so all they do is
they make it frame it that way, and
then very quickly, it turns into something else.
Happens every time. Here's the federal registrar document.
You could look at it. They're asking for
comment. The point is it's very clear. Oh,
did it refresh? No. Just cut to the
chase. First is the information blocking and digital
identity.
Information blocking is it continues to point out
the what it is is ultimately they they
say when they frame it, they say you.
Right? So, you know,
they're not allowed to block information from
your like, they're not allowed to block what
they have about you. They have to show
it even though how we never verify whether
they're showing the full picture. But then it
goes the other side of it because and
so too with with them and the and
the the the actual, what's the word they
used?
You know, the industry people. So if you're
in industry, you know, Pfizer out there, whoever
else, another company in the health field and
you don't have access to that data, you
can petition them and get access to it.
No blocking. You can't block it either way
was the point. So all it is is
a game to make you think like you're
being given access to what they stole from
you, but the point is they then have
access to everybody else. Oh, there's no silent
information. Your privacy is there. It's going out
the window. You you own nothing and you've
never been happy. That's where this is. One
by one, the removal of these things. Wasn't
the left and the weft that we're all
telling you about where your privacy is unnecessary?
Is now isn't it Larry Ellison is telling
you that you need to just be spied
on your entire life to make sure everyone
is falls in line? Funny how the left
and the right are on the same page
about that. But you dig into this, and
it's all talking about requiring digital identity credentials.
Every part of this, you could see it
re it overlaps with each section, and all
of it always comes back to the idea
of digital
IDs.
Digital health opt opt adoption,
digital health products, digital capabilities.
This will show you that it goes from
it goes from spot to spot. Like, it
it reiterates the digital,
digital IDs in multiple sections. There it is.
First one.
Where was it? There you go.
Implementing digital identity credentials.
I I mean, this is important to understand.
This is right on the surface of the
this this is the connected reality of what
this is.
Oh, got my
image wasn't in there.
Now I had an interesting thought, by the
way. So if if they have
all our biometric data,
right, the government, which they do. I mean,
that's what you have to understand that. Or
I guess, unless you, like I've actively tried
not to allow that to be something that's
given or prolific. If if not if given,
then not prolific.
But think about it. So they have access
to all your biometric data. Now what they
want you to say is that we wanna
secure,
but they they wanna drive us as Oracle
saying, remember, he said, by next year, you
won't have need to use a password anymore.
Use your biometrics.
That was the twenty twenty five World Government
Summit that Larry Ellison was speaking at. Fantastic.
He's saying that you can use biometrics. Okay.
So, what does that mean? You go to
a phone and you use a face scan,
like we do with some people do. I
don't.
On your iPhone. Right? You use your face
scan. So imagine a world where that's all
people use anymore. Right? So now, not only
does that I think they have backdoors and
stuff like that, but realize that let's just
say that's not the case. Well, if they
have access to all of your biometric data,
that could simply be reproduced to gain access
to anything. I was watching a show the
other day, and and somebody had died in
this endless show. And they used they the
police got the phone and just went, boop,
unlocked it with their face. Not thinking, maybe
that's why that happened. You know, passwords are
gone when you die or something else happens.
Now they can just scan your face. But
extension of that is if you're not around,
they can reproduce your biometric data with something,
whether it's three d printing, whether I mean,
who knows how that can work? And that's
not even the right way to put I
think it's about digital ways they could do
that. Either way, I think that really shows
you that that opens the door to everything
being accessible all the time no matter what,
which
is what they want. I mean, that's been
very clear. Gotta stop those domestic terrorists. Right?
Well, let's reiterate what Trump said again about
the plan. But, again, it was only for
immigration. Right? We'll keep thinking about this in
the in the bigger picture. Alright.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
For years, congress has required
biometric entry exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk, no action, never happens,
never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talks.
Unfortunately, when there is action, it's always the
wrong decision. Do you ever notice?
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system.
Yeah. Kinda different with the current context, isn't
it?
A tracking system everywhere.
Entry, exit,
all of it. Especially when you understand the
extension of what they argue is the is
the like, not just the 100 mile constitution
free zone, but with all the roots. I
mean, this has changed since this this ICE
immigration discussion. Now that basically becomes the entire
country. It's not hard to see how easy
that is for them to implement.
Now, additionally, in that same direction, here's Elon
Musk. We're building Grokipedia,
xAI, you know, the DARPA program. We will
be massive in a massive improvement over Wikipedia.
Frankly, it's a necessary step toward the XAI
goal of understanding the universe. All it is
is another consolidation of control just like Wikipedia
was. It's actively mis mis
manipulated and and, nonetheless,
was still pointed to by it was Twitter
or the government, even though in that point
college papers or colleges wouldn't even let you
use Wikipedia because it was so manipulative.
Same thing here. How many times are we
gonna watch them edit and alter what Grock
says and we're still gonna pretend like that's
not not only is it the fact that
it can be manipulated, but in real time
things can be changed. Right? It's not some
static encyclopedia style. This is gonna be something
they can over you know, Orwellian manipulate in
real time.
I don't know why we want that. I
just don't forget. We just talked about this.
AI government is here. K. They just made
it very clear that they announced that all
across the government, x AI is gonna be
used, GROC is gonna be used to implement
government processes,
to support and fill and facilitate, if not
become government. It's not a secret, guys. It's
happening. They're telling you that. So I just
hope we don't miss that point and how
much this is a problem with where we're
going.
Now interestingly,
not that I even care about Donald Trump
can say what he wants. He can put
out ridiculous point. If you wanna think it's
racist, you can think it's racist. If you
wanna think it's funny, you can think it's
funny. It's not the point. Donald Trump put
this out on his own thing and he
shared it again on Twitter. And all I
wanna point out is the fact that he
just got done talking about AI.
And, you know, if it's a if it's
something bad, blame AI, which he was kinda
joking, but then he said it a second
time, which I I mean, I think it's
a joke, but it's also that's what we're
gonna do. I think they're all doing that
already.
And I just think it's interesting that you
put stuff like this out, and one that
shows you how easy it is. Like, if
you block out the other side of this
and just look at at,
Schumer,
it's damn near hard to tell. It's it's
hard to tell that it's not like, this
is a pretty good version of the AI.
It's hard even his lips look like it
lines up. So you're gonna get to a
point very clear. I've been saying this for
years where it's gonna be all over the
place. They both sides start pumping out fake
information about each other using an
impossible to tell the difference AI, and then
nothing means nothing. Nothing means anything, everything means
nothing all the time. Again, Mountain Head, the
movie, very, very much about, I think, predictive
programming. Coming to a point to where Grok
releases your deep fake tool and, you know,
that's what the movie's about, and the world
collapses.
Who knows if that's the reality? Like, I'd
argue it wouldn't go like that. They would
use it in a way that we wouldn't
even be aware of is what I think.
But just recognize how we're kind of being
primed for that acceptance because it's all fun
and games until, you know, you can't tell
the difference.
And this is from 2025. Big tech and
AI firms are winning under Trump's second administration,
Derrick Rose.
Also, to add this end this segment
here, I'll let you do this first. Check
this out.
Every time. Oh, look. Weird. It's unavailable. Now
if Murray had not posted the link, which
not everybody does, sometimes you just go, like,
quote tweet and share it. Right?
You wouldn't be able to see that. It
would always show up as post unavailable no
matter how many times. But because he's got
the tweet, I can click it. And every
time you find out, oh, it is there.
Because it's halud falud, this guy who's been
lying about Israel since the beginning, a long
time, but largely post October 7. Go back.
Oh, look. Now it's there.
Refresh it.
Oh, look. It's not there anymore. You see
the point? This is an easy way for
this platform to act like it's a glitchy
thing, and all they're doing is hiding information
that makes this person look bad. That exposes
a very big problem. As Murray says, adviser
to Oracle,
you know, Barry Ellison
Oracle, who just purchased TikTok.
Advisor to Oracle, Microsoft, and Google,
this guy.
This guy. The tallest tower in Gaza City
is no more. Now you see it. Now
you don't.
Oh, okay. Because what? They're tunnels? Was there
no. No. They're just destroying all the buildings.
They're not even lying about it anymore. They're
just we're count we're getting rid of all
the infrastructure.
That was always a crime, guys. These are
the guys that are deciding what you're allowed
to say on these platforms,
Republicans and Democrats alike.
I'm sure we can figure that out.
And in in in The UK, which we
already briefly pointed to before, as Simon points
out, you've been Palantir ed.
Everywhere in the world, this is happening, guys.
I don't mean that like in every country
in the real time, but this is the
plan I'm arguing. This is where and it's
not just Palantir,
But it's about this very clear agenda, and
it's not hard to see.
He says, you will not be able to
work in The United Kingdom if you do
not have a digital ID.
Look at the shoe dropping, guys. It's already
happening here, just a little bit softer.
Wake up.
Now I'm gonna have to decide what I'm
gonna get into and not because I don't
wanna take too much longer. I wanna make
sure we I might just skip these next
two parts and finish with the main or
either the the follow-up.
I wanna make sure I have enough time
to make this live if I can for
tonight. But just very quickly, and I will
come back to this next show possibly tomorrow.
George Galloway was detained
under the terrorism act, guys. And I think
Americans need to recognize that this is already
here, guys. They just haven't really enforced it,
and that they could do this could already
be happening should they want to in this
country.
He was detained for nine hours with his
family. Nine hours.
That's issue for George Galloway, guys. You know
what I mean? Like, if he if this
is what worries me about what's going on
in the world, if George Galloway
is taking I mean, that could happen to
me. Because you're saying Palestine shouldn't be genocided?
That's yes. That's what they're using. People can
literally say if we go over to the
sea and they get arrested on the spot.
And this is what's crazy. Remember when Elon
Musk and all the right was all up
in arms on censorship in the in the
EU? Censorship in Britain? How dare they censor
and then they just don't care when they
censor the same way, if not way worse,
around Israel?
How do you miss what that shows you?
But we'll go through this in more in-depth
coming up. The point was simply where this
is going and a couple points about HEGSETH
and Portland, which we'll get into. I mean,
this the idea of what's happening there, guys.
And and all the same old usual suspects
just blindly cheering this on, acting like, look,
they're all the streets waving. Everyone supports it.
That's what these idiots like Gunther Egan do.
Oh, we all love the, martial law. This
is so stupid. Out of everybody, it's gonna
be largely be and let's not forget as
well that we're talking about Portland, which is
not it's more of a Democrat city. So
just they're just
doing whatever they can to sell you on
this, which is authoritarian.
And Jackson's, the violence will be stopped.
Okay. Oh, here here is another video of
them getting people on boats.
Yay. Freedom. Right? How do they know what
they're going after, guys? They're just arbitrarily stopping
people and going, hey. Papers, please.
But Nick Sorter's like, yay. Freedom. Ice. Boarding
ships in the he says they're ecstatic and
relieved to see martial law, apparently.
But here's something I just wanna play because
it's funny. I think more the reality of
what's going on on the ground.
That didn't work out. You know what I
love about stuff like this? I can I
can already feel the Republicans going, oh, how
dare you make fun of our people out
there risking their lives? You know, the same
way we did when Biden was in power
and the same things were done, and we
laugh at both. And then at that time,
the right was like, yeah, screw them. And
now they're like, oh.
It's just hilarious. These people, they're trapped in
this partisan game. Every day, it becomes more
clear. The funny thing to me about this
is one, just that's humorous because there's 17
people there and they can't catch a guy
on a bike standing around because there's really
actually not much happening in Portland despite the
narratives that Nick and the rest of the
liars are shoving down your throat.
But don't worry, though. Cash Patel has successfully
brought down
laser gate of 2025.
He has brought down the laser pointer who
shined it at a plane. Oh, we got
them all, guys. Oh, and the sandwich guy.
We got the sandwich guy and the laser
pointer guy, so we are good to go.
He and this is what's hilarious to me.
This guy says, how come nothing about you
and this oh, never mind. That's a secondary
point. He's simply saying, why haven't you talked
about this guy wearing a MAGA shirt, which
we'll get to in a second. The other
guy
says, so don't point the laser at a
hilo or the government will spend a billion
dollars to find you. You could have just
sent the police to arrest him. Like, this
is to make a statement. They're spending your,
you know, however much it cost to roll
out a massive federal response and all the
things they used and all the devices they
put out when they could've just walked up
his door and arrested him with the two
police officers.
But here's what he says. FBI Portland just
took down the residence of a suspect who
allegedly targeted targeted officers.
He can't even be honest about this. All
four individuals located there were illegally in custody.
Now I'm gonna wait to see what flushes
out because we know how often they lie,
but certainly could just be for people who
were here illegally. Wouldn't surprise me. But I
also recognize that they've said that about people
who work, so we'll have to wait and
see. But it says, come after law enforcement
and you'll get put away. Read the story,
guys. He pointed a laser pointer at a
helicopter. That's it. Now, yes, I get the
point. Sure. I'm not diminishing the very small
thing that that is. Like, I'm not it
is something that can have an effect. So
I mean, you can argue it matters. But
But is this what we're gonna go after?
This is what you care about? And, yeah,
spend all that money? Great job, Cash.
And my real point, that seems to be
out the gist of what's happening right now.
Attacks by Antifa and other domestic terrorists were
why they were deployed there. Right? So let's
make it a point. It's not about just
random roving this is not the same argument
as Washington DC. They're making this about Antifa
and domestic terrorism because they think it's on
a war ravaged place
authorizing the use of full force if necessary.
Right? We talked about that the last show.
The deployment was framed as response to ongoing
protests in the area,
right, which began in June 2025 against its
immigration policies. Okay. The protests have been small,
Crock says, when you can easily report find
this out for yourself,
Under 30 people, most places. Mostly peaceful since
June.
This is even that's Grock telling you that.
And it says with no reported violence escalating
to require military intervention.
Elon's gonna probably rush in and change as
fast as he can. Violent crime to Portland
has actually declined in 2025
with homeless with homicides down 51%
in the first half of the year. How
much you wanna bet he takes credit for
that when he leaves if he does?
September 28, these are the protests they're talking
about.
Protest drew about 200 people outside the ICE
facility. These are the largest ones. The most
of them have been 30 or so as
they're reporting.
They made two arrests. Why?
For causing physical injuries, which we know today
means they could brush up against their arm.
That's not a joke, by the way. They
made it clear. You touch me at all.
You're gonna go to jail for ten years.
Like, they're being crazy.
And it says, protests continue with a smaller
crowd on twenty ninth. Two arrests
confirmed to be related
disturbances.
September 30. And they're they're opaque for a
reason, guys.
No arrests.
That's the reality, guys. Total arrest tied to
the thing they say they're there for, four
people.
Four people.
That's the reality, guys. And you think it
and Nick's cheering on martial law deployment?
We should be embarrassed by this. And, again,
I'll include even the top 30 most crime
ridden cities, and none of these things are
even close. Memphis, by the way, is the
one of the closers, and they don't even
seem to be really doing anything about that.
Very interesting. Now we'll go over in another
show another show some of these important realities,
videos of fatal ice shootings. And it says
that the officer was seriously injured.
Like the one we talked about when they
opened fire on the car and said they
got ran over and then admitted that didn't
happen in court and they still arrested the
guy. Here.
They were seriously injured and dragged by a
car. Guess what? That's the second of the
two they keep pointing to. So one was
a lie we've already proven. Turns out the
second one is two. Video indicates the officer
suffered minor injuries and he himself dismissed it
as nothing major.
They claimed look. I'm not saying you shouldn't
care about that. What I'm saying is they
then turned it into, was dragged by the
car.
Bondi has continued to say that. If they
have to lie about both cases, they're lying
to you pretty obviously about the whole damn
thing.
Here's an American citizen, 79 year old American,
slammed to the ground by ice, broken ribs,
trauma. He's he's dealing with that. You know,
bottom line, he was an American citizen. He
tried to give the papers. They didn't care.
How do we not care about this as
people that claim to care about the constitution?
Major,
ruling.
They rule that the deportation,
Palestinian campus activist and for basically two things,
that Marco Rubio now is arguably not allowed
if this continues to go forward, able to
deport people because of these things, and that
it says very clearly to,
specifically US citizens
if they say the things they claim are
problems. Like, this is it's obviously a free
speech. This is the house. Largely, Republicans telling
you what you're doing is unconstitutional.
They don't care. But Trump targeting the a
pro Palestinian campus activist also is now seen
as unlawful.
We'll go with this in in the next
show. I I this is important. But just
understand that they've now ruled these are illegal.
And that we're Americans are on the lip.
They like he says in this very clip,
both rat naturalized, but also born here. I'll
play that in the next show.
Now let's try to get through this reasonably
quickly, but I want you to see all
this.
Now here's what Megyn Kelly recently said when
she was asked. Being kind to the other
side doesn't mean sacrificing one inch of your
principles.
Oh, okay. I said, exactly.
Too bad she does not think that or
demonstrate that as she and other mainstream alternative
and mainstream media like her literally disregard their
adversaries' constitutional rights every single day because fill
in the blank with today's outrage story.
It's just insulting that they love to stand
there and pro and and
project
the righteous,
you know, like like they're somehow you know,
the the I don't I think she must
know she's not doing that, but it's hard
to tell. Self awareness seems to be something
people are lacking in the partisan field.
Now just really quickly, the poor I was
just gonna highlight this.
Sam Parker says, normal people after what happened,
the shooting in In L D LDS
Mormon church. More normal people. My condolences, this
was awful, which, yeah, most people did, including
myself.
Whether I say that online or put whoever
I wanna see or, you know, whatever. The
point is that is what most normal people
would do. That's sad.
Regime propagandists came out and said it was
a global terror attack on Christianity. See? And
he agrees. That doesn't make sense. I agree
with that too. Now here's what I wanna
point out because I think he it doesn't
look like he follows me anymore, so I
think he took this wrong. Mormon haters.
Mormons aren't Christians.
Now you can be insulted by me arguing
they're not Christianity because not, by the way.
But
why the why is it that it's the
inherent point that it's insulting, that I'm trying
to be divisive or diminishing? I'm not.
They're just different.
If I say Judaism is not Christianity, is
that a knock on Judaism? No. I mean,
maybe from the mind of somebody who sees
that as the you know, me that's not
how I'm trying to make that point. I
just wanna make that clear yet again. I
think it's pretty easy to prove that they're
not even close to the same thing. I'm
not saying they don't worship Jesus. That's not
the point. It's about them not being Christianity.
If it was Christianity, it'd be called Christianity.
It's that's easy way to say it, but
the reality is they're fundamentally different in many
ways. We've already gone over. So it shouldn't
be taken as an insult, guys. It just
has to understand that people like his point
too. That's my point. That they were going
out attack on Christianity.
That's why I was making that case. So
you almost kinda seem to make the same
point, but then I mean, I don't know.
I mean, I maybe he's not aiming it
at me, but I feel like he used
to follow my work, so maybe not. But
either way, I either him or anybody else,
I just want that to be seen. Not
my intention.
I don't it's it's about the information and
the facts.
And so here
oh, it's just there's another another,
person calling out people that were, you know,
major Christian pastors online calling, you know, demon
Mormons. Not even remotely what I was doing,
but just also showing you that there's other
parts of Christianity that don't feel they're even
close.
And, of course, Trump saying it was an
attack on Christians. Keep that in mind as
we go through all this because they all
did that. Very clearly came out. That's not
even the main point today since others seem
to push back on that, but largely, Republicans
don't seem to be you know, they seem
very aware that this is not the same
thing. And I think it was about just
trying to hide that they jumped the gun
and did it again, by the way. Now
two things I forgot to include in the
last show. One, just to maybe point this
out because we've talked about it before. It's
really important to understand that this might insult
them just the same, and it's not meant
to be insulting because it's not every Mormon's
responsibility to the leadership, but that there's a
very, very, very deep and long standing obvious
connection to Zionism.
They'll publicly say, we're it's basically Zionism's cousin
or whatever. They're they've written articles about this,
like, from leadership in Zionism.
So it's worth considering as well as the
fact that the origins of Mormonism is rife
with really, really, really hard stories, like dressing
up like Native Americans and murdering Christians. Like,
that's a very provable story. But that's Christianity
is rife with horrible stories too. It's not
about one being bad, good, understanding that. My
point is to think about that connection today
and how that might play a role with
what Zionism is doing in the world. But
also not forgetting the
Trump executive order that literally laid out Christianity,
attacks on Christianity as being and then something
like this happens, and they all lurched to
call it Christianity?
Feels interesting, doesn't it? It's worth thinking about
those things as we go through this.
Now, first,
this is one of the first things people
saw, right? We have the American flag in
the back of the truck,
which, of course, we should question. FBI could
lie. FBI could fake things. Left could pretend
to be right. Right could pretend to be
left. All that's possible.
We must know that. Right? But assuming that's
the case because you can't be my side
is where you fall short on that partisans,
and that's what both sides seem to do.
But American flag. So you have to at
least consider maybe he is. Or even then,
let's be clear, just having American flags, you
know, in a truck that way does seem
to be more of a right leaning thing,
but let's stop being so quick to judge
these things. I again, I know Republicans who
have think who let let's put it this
way. I know people that lean right
that don't support Trump. I know Republicans don't
support Trump. I know Republicans that have flags.
I know I know liberals that have flags
with big trucks. I mean, there's a lot
of overlap, but it's not there there are
always slants. I know Republicans that wore masks.
I know Liberals that did not. You know,
it's lazy. That's what they always do, self
serving arguments. But so so at that point,
you're going, okay. Maybe.
And the quartering
comes out. And here it is live on
my show. That's weird. I don't know why
they got so small. Just to show you
on the last show, that's live I'm showing
you, and here's the tweet that he deleted,
where he says, the American flags on the
church shooter's truck is maybe the most obvious
op in history.
Now see, you could come out and go,
I think it's an op. But saying it
like that, that's just dishonest, guys. That that
is first of all, it wouldn't be the
most obvious op in history, not even close.
You're just doing this to drive people to
make that assumption. If no other information ever
came out, they would run with this. You
know that. He goes, I bet they had
still had folds in them. Now I'm not
even saying he means to be deliberately dishonest.
Maybe he just truly is wrapped up in
this partisan divide. That's possible too. But it's
worth pointing out that deleting of it makes
that harder to sell. But he goes, this
will end up being a lefty trying to
frame the right. See See how you're already
setting that out there without any evidence? And
if it ended up going a little further
and no more, you would have made that
case. You know it.
Here's another one. Oh, for then just then
people he deleted it. Right? People were posting
underneath it. Well, here's here's his account. Here's
it on Facebook, and I can prove this
is account. I'll show you in a second.
All the different images of Trump and all
these different things, yeah, that seems to be
the reality.
But maybe still, you could support Trump and
not feel yourself a Republican. You could support
Trump and feel you're politically not chosen. You
could feel you could argue you're picking Trump
and last time you voted a Democrat. Like,
it's not as simple as they want you
to think it is.
And, of course, then we saw this come
up. And this is from the actual Google
view as well as the post that you
could see here. The point is that this
is something is verifiable,
and it shows he's got a Trump sign.
Right? But it's above a stop sign. So,
therefore, the assumption immediately became he means stop
Trump.
Could. Right? Could mean that, or you could
just be choosing to see what you want.
See what I'm saying? Like, it's just lazy
kind of thinking. And at this point, you
already have other indications that it's going in
the other direction, so you choose to make
that what you will, which is exactly what
he did. The quartering says, he had a
stop Trump sign in his yard. Obviously, PTSD
mental illness is the leading candidate here, but
it's another Democrat
killer.
Gosh. It's crazy to me, man. And he
deleted that too. This person says he did
not have a stop Trump sign. He had
a Trump sign above the stop sign. And
he goes, he donated to ActBlue, the next
guy. And, no, he didn't. And we'll show
you that next. He didn't. It's a different
guy with the same name. This always happens
by design. Now I'm not saying the morons
that jump to these things are doing it
by design, but it is cultivated like
this. And this guy even goes, oh, you're
right, which good on him for actually being
willing to admit that. Good on him. But
let's stop falling for the tricks.
So this person says, Freedom Piper, the shooter
in today's oh, Freedom Piper is the account.
If Shooter in today's church attack in Michigan
is a 40 year old Iraqi war veteran
who most likely was himself a Christian. And
he he is white,
not black,
Hispanic or Muslim or transgender. His motives for
the attack have yet to be revealed. It
is sad fact that when you run a
society into the ground, it fails all of
the citizens on all sides of the political
spectrum. It is likely that Thomas Sanford, like
the left wing shooters,
have seen late that we've seen lately, which
we can. I will get I'll end with
that. You you still can't prove just like
you can't hear, even still.
I would argue it's very likely that he's
a MAGA person, but the point is that
you can't prove definitively.
And even less so with Robinson or the
Dallas shooter.
And even then, some of these went the
other way, and they just stopped pointing to
it. It's very, very, very dishonest.
But he says it's likely even with those
other shooters
where was it? He says, well, at the
he thought this sex saver was mentally ill,
he says. After all, no healthy person goes
on a murder spree. Well, you know, it's
also debatable since I think there's more going
on than just mental illness. I do agree
that's likely one of the culprits, but I
believe there's much more capable. Let's not forget.
We watch as people may push back on
stuff like this. Like an MK Ultra reality,
guys, that was a very real program. Regardless
of whether you think that it exists today,
which I think we can prove it never
stopped,
they absolutely did that. So the idea that
we ever pretend like that's just out of
the realm of possibility is wild to me,
but that shows you the fake construct that
we exist in. So think about any other
number of things too. When it says right
or left, the final act was horrific and
must be condemned. 100%.
Now, it doesn't it must be that we
have to go out and say, Oh, I
could damn the thing. But in my own
mind, in my own life, I do. I
think it's terrible and I completely condemned that
thing. But it says, this person posts the
guy's
Twitter account, which is not him. You can
quite literally see from the photo, by the
way. This is the one that everybody jumped
on. And it goes, progressive, democrat. And it
goes, wrong guy. See the photo. Already debunked.
And it goes, he was wearing a MAGA
shirt. Nice try. But the point is, people
were jumping in and doing this. Because somebody
saw a name that was dissimilar, probably Loomer
or someone like that, and just dumped it
into the conversation without ever thinking about it.
And this is what they're pointing to right
here. It goes, people need to stop pretending
the psychopath that shot up the LDS church
was MAGA. He put flags on his truck
to mislead people, because he's probably watching the
quartering. And he goes, just another liberal democrat
doing what they do. And this is a
screenshot that was going around saying, so the
Michigan church shooter was a devout democrat who
donated a regular Democrat site. The point was,
if you read very closely and do your
due diligence, it's in the wrong state.
Also not the same guy. But he goes
from his own mouth. Right? He's pointing to
the wrong account. So they're they're and this
is what the guy says in regard to
that. My point is you can prove these
are not true. But this guy says this
happened in Michigan, not Virginia.
You could read more in the conversation. This
is very much not the same guy. Like,
you can literally prove the one they were
all pointing to is not the same face,
not the same location, similar name, not even
the exact same. This is what they do
every time.
And yet they're out there driving you could
tell there's not a lot of engagement because
they're wrong. And I think at this point,
it was already clearly seen as wrong, but
it was still being driven in.
And and both of those got deleted. The
quartering deleted both of those, which shows you
something. But Fuzzy says, so far on Twitter,
we've seen theories. He was MAGA, far left,
Mossad, Satan worshiper, PTSD, a Muslim, far left,
racist, blah blah blah. We don't know s
h I t. See, somebody actually smart enough
to recognize how ridiculous all this is because
he's responding to quartering, damn claiming he knows
for sure.
Miss Jinxed at this point found the Instagram
and says, we found the Instagram of the
of the shooter. He created an account in
2020, never made any post, but he did
follow three accounts.
Looks like it was Trump, Ivanka, and Donald
Trump. I mean, you could this the and
that again, maybe he hates them. Maybe he
did it to track them.
I'm I also argued like I titled it.
It seems very likely it's the case, but
the reality is
the right response is every indication suggests he
was a Republican.
But other than that, we don't know for
sure. That's an honest accurate point in this.
But you can look into it more. It's
the same kind of thing, and this only
gets more clear the more you dive through
his information. This person says the the shooter,
Jacob, Stan Thomas Jacob Stanfield
and his entire family aren't just Trump supporters.
He says they're hardcore mag conspiracy lunatics. That's
how he frames it. Now you can decide
for yourself. You can look at their post.
To me, it's pretty clear to support Trump.
That's the takeaway.
But, see, even this is framing that says,
look, it's a crazy maniac because that's the
two sides doing it to each other, and
that's the game they're playing. And
random people fall in the midst of it
because they're so convinced the other side's the
problem. He also says, we all knew it
was stupid for JD Vance
and other Republican leaders to claim the violence
only comes to the left. We didn't have
to wait long for it to be proven
right. For for it wait long to be
proven right that they were wrong in doing
that is his point.
Now Eric Solwell is gonna sell this game
place. Right? So now he comes out and
go see, and they go, Democrat said it,
therefore we ignore it.
I argue that group in doing that is
getting smaller and smaller by the day because
it's becoming harder and harder to make that
seem like it's anything anybody should be listening
to. But he says, I'm sure JD Vance
agrees with me, and it doesn't matter that
the Michigan terrorist was a MAGA supporter because
in America, regardless of your politics, violence has
never been the answer. Or that it shouldn't
matter because political violence is a hate speech
game. Violence is the point. Charge him for
a crime. Why make it different because you
argue this political motivation, especially when we can't
even decide or agree on the basic facts
of the point? And you, from the highest
levels of power, say left lunatic before you
even know what's going on, just like they
were doing to right people during their time
in power.
In Eagle Guntherman or Gunther Eagleman says, so
that's the Democrat party. They are the party
hating violence. God, these people are children.
Do I think, yeah, you're both sides are
doing the same thing, and these people need
to point at each other to rationalize their
massive sit like, industry of BS on this
platform.
But so the point is, he says, let's
acknowledge this is a bad thing. Right? And
he goes, tell that to them. They did
it.
Like, can we not acknowledge if these people
need to be regarded as children?
Like, that this is what if a child
responded like that in kindergarten, you would reprimand
them. And this person says, I denounce violence,
period. I don't want anyone commending it in
my name or my beliefs, period.
They're gonna go, you're lying. That's what a
lot of them say right there. Grock, this
person asked, can you find instances of rep,
representative Solwell and and Eric Solwell calling not
conservative Nazis?
And then this of course, you probably can,
and I think they do, which we'll get
to that point in a second where that's
what other all doing back and forth, how
lazy this is. But Steph rightly says, I
thought words weren't violence. And she says, I'm
a conservative.
Kilo says, just playing by their rules.
Yes. And we finally get to the point.
Right?
Which is, and this is the entire issue.
Rationalizing the same problem you were calling out
because they started it. We can't be this
easy to manipulate. We can't be this childish.
Wait. Could be a bot too, though. Let's
not forget, but those bots are influencing people's
decisions. And people like the, you know, the
same old usual suspects seem to not care
and love and dive right into it. But,
you know, quickly going more. I mean, you
can keep going through the information. Here's the
actual Facebook account, so that's why I'm showing
you this one. But, you know, shooting, hunting.
Well, I know Democrats do those things. But
the more it builds, the more it becomes
clear,
Like, in regard to being likely. Now here's
the archive of the actual page. You can
look at it all for yourself. It's not
hard to see. And the reality is that
it does appear to be the original image,
and you can look further.
And, you know, seeing the actual sharing of
the images and the post they have, and
this is the family. And then, of course,
the the introduction of a part that I
found interesting. So l Alex Cole says, notice
how quiet Republicans got now that the LDS
church shooter is an actual Trump supporter? Or
the right way to frame it is now
that you see him wearing a Trump shirt
because he says MAGA terrorist. You see, they're
all doing the same thing, guys. That's that's
ridiculous. Alex Cole is doing the same thing
they're doing to him.
Hopefully, he can recognize that if he has
good intentions. This person says, notice how the
left only has fake news and hoaxes, and
he shares an image without it.
Now, do you think Kevin Dalton cared to
look? Or did you see the image without
it and just knew it had to be
the thing because we know the left?
Right?
Well, Alex says, nice try. Here's the Facebook
post, which you can see. I just pro
showed it to you. And he goes, even
if it comes out to be true, it
would be, like, 50 to one. And you
see, that's how they're all looking at it.
It doesn't matter. We'll just ignore it. See?
Right there. That just by the way, that
was added after the fact. I didn't see
that.
Sewing saying that this was fake. The real
one is still live with a with a
Trump post on it. But the only thing
here, so it doesn't matter. Even if we
even though we've all lied about it 75
times, if it turned out to be MAGA,
it doesn't matter anyway because lefties are the
majority. Well, that's actually not even the reality
based on the data they point to. I'm
arguing as always that I don't agree with
all that data. But what's hilarious to me
is this person goes, grok,
from Elon and Twitter,
who commits the most left killings? And it
says data sources like the ADL and the
US government
and Nikkato indicate right wing extremists have committed
the majority of the kill Well, my point
is always is a lot of the things
they deem right wing political violence are overlaps
with the ADL manipulating the situation to beef
up numbers for what they were doing when
they were aiming at the Republican party and
the trucker convoy and antisemitism
of Trump. Remember that? And now we're seeing
the same thing oscillate the other way where
they make it all about Palestine.
So either way, I don't I don't know
how we can flesh out the reality of
that. Both sides actively do things that we
again, who cares about that? The reality is
people commit crimes, charge them with a crime.
Present your evidence, charge them with a crime.
If you allow the government to broaden out
their construct, they're gonna apply it to everybody
they
can.
But it does appear that this was a
lie. Now this is a forensic
I I don't I don't think we can
trust these platforms. It's pretty,
like, I had to use a few of
them to even see, like, the consistency feels
like this is the direction. And again, even
after I did this, on Twitter now, they're
even saying it is the original. I mean,
obviously, we have the original post, so I
think that declares it. But the point is
that this actually shows exactly where that might
be a problem. I found that really revealing.
Right? And here's the original, and that's not
what they find. What I found interesting though
is that you got these images, like, they're
claiming there's weird alterations in the image. So
here's something that I found interesting,
is that I think a lot of people
edit images today. Right? They wanna, you know,
oh, he's got a scab on his knee.
I'll take that off. Oh, and the sun
was glinting. I'll move that away, hypothetically.
And then so then what happens is people
go out and they go, oh, it was
altered and claim that it's weird. Right? But
as far as I could tell, all the
evidence continue to suggest that this is the
real one and that this obviously shows you
where the image was removed. Very interesting. Right?
Oh, and then this one simply says, looks
like computer generated or modified, but a lot
of these sites are hard to trust.
So here is Cat Turd coming out and
saying
you know, literally grabbing this random guy's post,
which, let's see, has 4,000,000
views. How many of them do you think
noticed this or care to look at it
or ignore it when they see it?
If if only it hadn't been photoshopped, they
write.
And he goes derp.
Because he doesn't care. You think he did
due diligence? You think he think he knows
what the definition of that term is?
Well, I said derp indeed and just showed
the fact that they even Twitter's saying that
they're lying. And I also I just said
I'll be discussing this today. Right? All the
usual suspects are doing the same thing.
Here's just an article from Telegraph. Mormon church
gunman was marine who supported Trump.
Funny how they're all being quiet about it
now. As Alex Gold even says, Charlie Kirk
gets killed. MAGA, this is civil war. Iraq
veteran and American flag instructor shoots up a
church. MAGA, come on, guys. Let's not be
quick to judge. It's the same thing again.
Both of the partisan sides do. Not everybody
that is actually just liberal conservative. But I
mean, like the team sport politics.
And Katie Vance comes out and makes a
really weird
broad statement.
As he rightly calls out, I wonder why
he didn't really go into detail. Right? They
know what they're the punch they're pulling. Caroline
Liebert tries to, you know, give, like, here's
the reality of it, that it's a guy
who hated the Mormon faith. You know? But
didn't Trump say it was an attack on
Christianity? Didn't you guys tell it was Muslim
and Jew hating? I mean, how in the
world do they just think we can look
away from how lazy this was?
I'll I'll point this out in a second
or, you know, next show. Also, this was
somebody circulating this, which is hilarious to me,
which again, you know my point about the
numbers.
But they go, Democrats calling out political opponents
Nazis has consequences.
Study, left wing terrorism climbs a thirty year
high.
And apparently, again, the lacking of due diligence
on TeamSport politics
didn't realize that the gray represented the right
and the yellow or orange represented
the left.
So literally proving your point backwards and you
don't even realize it. That's just perfect where
we are today.
Now lastly, very quickly, let's see what time
we're at.
Okay. We should be good if I rush.
They're all coming out out like they have
been forever. And in DC Draino, a trans
terrorist attacked a Minnesota church in August. Charlie
was killed by a trans sympathizer. Oh, see,
they're they're slightly altering it because they don't
know for sure. Like, that's you guys were
telling us he was a trans himself. You
guys were telling us he was married to
a trans person. Funny. Right? But then preaching
on Christianity on college campuses, well, we don't
know that. He hasn't confessed, and they haven't
even gone to trial yet. A mass shooter
targeted a Michigan church today. Charlie's memorial, you're
blaming this on the left? I mean, this
is this is insane. I bet you he
deletes this post.
Christianity is under attack. That was a Mormon
church. Right? These people are ridiculous.
Just remember, this guy held a phase one
Epstein binder. And this guy says, you literally
don't know that Tyler Robinson did that. You
also and the also the Minnesota shoot s
h I t was a hoax, he argues.
No picture or footage of the shooter. I
swear you influencers are the worst. That's what
he said.
Same thing here. Pointing out that he was,
you know, just you guys don't know this,
and you're lying about this before you even
know.
Same point on the other one. Next order,
doing the same thing. And here's what he
says.
His execution should be made public. These guys
are just trying to push the boundaries because
they think they've got these are the very
people who are there being used to point
to everybody else as if they're the extreme
right. He says, Tyler Robinson, you hasn't been
convicted, and we don't even have a proof
beyond the reasonable doubt, and and he's the
that he's the assassin. For you to call
for his execution is grossly irresponsible contrary to
American due process and should completely destroy your
credibility.
But we know that it won't.
Or it, has. We know that it won't
affect the numbers that were shown. Now you
can look through the data for yourself and
realize that everything they claim they have on
him comes from a note they claimed they
left but has now been destroyed,
text to his partner that they reproduced that
you can't verify, and hours before he left,
did he messaged that group to say these
things which you can't verify? The physical evidence
was the rifle,
which seems to be his dad's, which we
can't verify, was put you know, taken apart,
put together, taken apart, put it and wrapped
in a towel, ballistics matching the weapon to
the shooting, which the weapon seems to be
an anomaly, as well as the DNA and
forensic links of the ongoing investigation through specific
re re main limited.
So so basically nothing other than things that
we can't really verify. Could be. Find it
interesting. Betty Johnson doing the same. When politics
feels like moral war. When violence feels like
the only option, the face failed state, civil
war territory.
Yeah.
Didn't you guys scream about civil war for
the last yeah. Yes.
Our side hasn't changed, he said. We love
our fellow Americans. And when Joe Biden terminal
cancer was announced, nobody celebrated. Are you absolutely
might brain dead?
He's just this is them rec just creating
a narrative and selling on you. We all
know what actually happened there just like they
do both back both of the team sports
sides do the same thing back and forth.
And it says, look at the other side.
ICE agents shot. Oh, so you're pretending it's
left still? Church is burned, pretending it's left
still?
The guy with the MAGA shirt, right? Radicals
celebrating evil, what did you guys just do?
On and on. It's so tiresome to have
to even play this game. We should even
try not to even step back into it
anymore.
But this is the guy who's getting a
100 or a million views on a video
about lying and what's going on. You can't
make peace with those who wanna kill you,
he says. But let's talk about trying to
not cause violence. This is what they're doing.
Let's not forget. Benny Johnson, I only recently
found out, was fired for plagiarism from be
from BuzzFeed. Actually,
him. It's insane how these people can even
then become something. Like,
how do you recreate a career based on
just wild to me. But here is Ted
Cruz.
I'm actually I think I'm gonna wrap this
up right now. But the point is, they
come out and go,
way to ratchet down the rhetoric, Gavin,
after he calls him a fascist. Right? Here
he is calling the left fascist.
Like, it just this is a cartoon we
live in right now. This is absolutely ridiculous.
Here's Trump calling fascist the left. Right? Here's
a million tweets from Stephen Miller calling the
left fascist. And he's out there clutching his
pearls but being called a fascist.
It's ridiculous.
All of them doing the same thing. Look
at that. Oh, you're a fa how dare
you call him a fascist. All these people
doing the same thing. Every single one of
them.
And and oh, you know what? I didn't
read George Galloway's post. I'm gonna come back
to this for the next time. But lastly,
there's a recent example of something I thought
was interesting while they're trying to avoid looking
at all the stuff they're failing on right
now. Next order comes out and goes breaking.
Joint base, Maguire. New Jersey, lockdown.
And what seems pretty clear to me is
he posted this at a time when you
could prove it had already ended. Officials confirmed
no active shooter was present and they after
an hour, it was done.
But then stop him from seeing the report,
shoving it out there, and keeping people pitched
into something that's not even actually going on.
Elon Musk says, funny to think that Bill
Clinton's policies when he was president were essentially
MAGA.
Yep. Exactly. It's all two party illusion. Thank
you for making that clear, Elon.
Pretty much.
Well, I'm gonna wrap up quickly here, guys.
I'm gonna do my best to get this
out live today for the IMA panel. Maybe
I can give a couple, you know, fifteen
minute window push. We can make it happen
for sure, but don't don't,
take my word on that because it might
change based on things. But I'm gonna do
my best right now. So I'll leave you
there. Hopefully, we can get to this more
tomorrow. Share the show out, support us, support
the IMA. I'll see you later tonight, if
not tomorrow morning. Love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.