World is changing, and every counterterrorism
professional I speak to in the federal government
and overseas
feels like we are at the doorstep of
another nine eleven. Maybe not something that catastrophic
in terms of the visual or the,
the numbers,
but that we can see it building,
and we don't quite know how to
how to stop it.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Up.
09/27/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Quite the large, sprawling show. I really don't
wanna make this as long as we do
normally for for a reason maybe you'll kind
of recognize as we go through all this.
I want this to reach people today. If
you're watching today,
I really hope, regardless of how much you
enjoy long shows or not, that you'll try
to stick this through to the end because
it's important to me that I
finish with the most important point because of
as I've talked about recently more than once,
just the the way that I try to
construct these shows for you to make kind
of a larger point. If oftentimes, I don't
even really accentuate or say out loud something
that's kinda meant to be kind of a
running, you know, an idea that I'm trying
to, you know, show you, that I see
allow you to decide for yourself. But I'm
gonna start with that point today, which is
obviously what I the the deployment of the
military or rather the report of that about
to happen in Portland, Oregon.
And what that really shows us,
I'm not gonna go into it all right
now. I wanna make those points when we
get to the the the the focal point
of it today, which will be the the
last segment.
But just the general things we've talked about.
You know, what what this the rationale behind
why this is happening, why the DC move
was first, why the kind of feigning of
Chicago, Memphis, and then now Portland, none none
of which have happened yet, the importance of
that next step from DC because DC is
a very different animal than a state. State's
rights, the deployment, the military,
and all these different conversations.
But I want you to think about what
that is and and what
how
in any real material sense, what's happening outside
of narrative is different than martial law deployment
and what the the right would do if
that was Obama or Biden. And I made
this point. I'll get to it and actually
a post that I really appreciated the exchange
even though I disagree with the person's opinion
of of the way it went down in
regard to them arguing martial law might be
necessary.
The point was I simply proposed as I
often do if this was Biden doing this.
And even for the exact same reason,
which whether or not you think it's likely
or possible, just hypothetically, that Biden was saying
Antifa is a terrorist organization,
labels it so, deploys the military
to Portland
to get rid of Antifa or rather just
domestic terrorism with kind of the lurking Antifa
idea, which is what's happening. It's not really
specifically being stated because of Antifa.
Would you be okay with that? Even if
it was actually just stated, we're going after
Antifa and only them, would you be okay
with Obama or Biden deploying the military on
the streets to do so? I mean, realistically,
I'm not in either context. And I think
that's where most Americans are because that's crazy.
It's wrong. What they're doing is an abuse
of power regardless of even if you think
the reason is justified.
But more so that if it was I
would argue most people on the partisan side
of this, the team sport politics would would
absolutely
be jumping down everyone's throats if it was
Obama or Biden, but make excuses for Trump.
And then vice versa, we're we see the
same thing, and we we did during COVID
nineteen.
So we're gonna go through quite a few
topics, I think, that I'm gonna try to
do these as, you know, kind of rapid
fire if I can. As usual, I'll probably
get lost in the show and forget that
it's even the point today, but that's my
intention to start. I have a few things
I wanna get into early, and one of
them is gonna be about Comey. Just to
give you an update on on what
I was gonna say so as I'm saying
and I'm watching the Fox News page refresh
and I saw the title change. Great journalism
today. It doesn't change the point. I just
think that's so interesting how mainstream media can
just, like, rapidly update their their content, their
titles, and there's not even an asterisk anymore.
The state of current journalism is insane.
It is you know, it's funny how that
word gets stuck in my head. It really
it's it is where we are, but I
need to find a better more better better
word for how crazy all this is. But
call me and importantly, you know, what that
shows us and what I think is going
to be nothing.
Not because Comey doesn't deserve be deserve to
be in jail. I think he does for
many other reasons than even what they're pointing
to. But I don't think that's where this
is going. And another development shows you that
that's already being floated. That's kind of where
it's gonna end up despite all the hype
and framing that it's gonna you know, I'm
gonna wait and see because as even though
I disagree
with, I think, where everything is going, even
if this you know, point is I wanna
see these people in jail just like I
wanna see you know, but due process, charged
with a crime, presented evidence, and if they're
guilty, put them in jail. But my point
is I think we recognize most of these
people are conducting all sorts of criminal activities
throughout politics.
But But we're gonna go over where I
think that's going and, again, give you my
thoughts on it. I wanna make sure we
talk about Epstein and where that is currently
because weirdly gets I'm actually kinda shocked to
see how little attention this conversation gets. It's
still being talked about by, I think, you
know, like, the majority of the undercurrent of
the conversation, but the ones at the top
of the kind of social media paradigm,
even people that I like, it's just weird
how much that conversation has drifted away. And
our even our shows, you know, it's like
this. Right now, in my opinion, like, the
Epstein thing, what's going on with Gaza, Palestine,
the genocide,
and the constitutional developments, those are, like, the
three biggest things in my mind that I
think immediately affect what we're doing and, you
know, Israel infiltration throughout all of that, which
is a major point in today's show. But
Epstein, of course, we're gonna update you on
where that is and and how crazy it
is that people are pretending it's not happening
and how the Republicans are absolutely pulling punches
around it.
And, of course, the inner undeniable overlap with
Israel and why that plays a main factor
in this conversation around Epstein.
But UN, Netanyahu, you might have seen the
conversations around this. I think it's important to
highlight what that shows us, and this is
really where we kinda dovetail with the tech
infiltration
because he said something in this conversation that
is
pretty profound.
I mean, not really just in in the
the comment about you have a piece of
Israel in a in a previous discussion when
he's referencing in the
was it 50 one Israel Conference where all
these politicians went to Israel and just kind
of bowed to their leader apparently, and, ultimately,
he kind of threatened them. As far as
that's what I genuinely think. You can decide
for yourself. I'll I'll point to it again.
But now he's recently in front of the
UN, you know, as a genocidal, warmongering
murderer,
all accurate terms,
Currently wanted by the international community in multiple
ways. And here he is being praised by
our congressmen and women, both sides of the
paradigm, by the way.
Now well, and and to be clear, the
UN is not just The United States, but
the point being is that we're talking about
New York. We're ultimately talking about
a, you know, a US allowance of this
whole process, which is very important to think
about.
But his statements there around tech, around TikTok,
around a few different things, I think are
very relevant to talk about and what it
shows you about what he did to Gaza,
about what he said, about how he decided
to manipulate
everybody's phones
and broadcast a certain message, which is not
new, not by any stretch of the imagination.
But it really needs to show us that
this is beyond I mean, we're not the
whole point is it's not just about Gaza
and the electro,
the communications control.
It's something much more than that. We're talking
about devices that have their own security. They're
showing that they have the ability to infiltrate
tech
worldwide. And I think we already know this,
a pager attack and a lot I think
it's very important to think about what this
shows us as we go through this today
and many different comments that were made. And
I wanna overlap that with the recent XAI,
which is very immersed with Israel and the
essential government role is playing.
GSA and everything else it seems. I wanna
talk about some points around Israel, but also
get into,
you know, the
ICE overlap conversation of what recently happened, the
recent shooting, and the real point I wanna
get to. And all of these, hopefully, not
that long, but just kind of rapid fire
points to build the the way I see
this in regard to the main point of
deployment of the military,
potentially, he's reporting, coming to Portland and what
that means. That's three different cities now. He's
floated this beyond DC and all of them
in, you know, states but outside of a
DC situation. And I think it's important to
think about what that will be, that precedent
that will create
and, you know, where all this goes with
all of the building of the domestic terrorism
and really to show you how Donald Trump's
focus and Biden's focus
are near identical outside of
additional verbs and point you know, different words
they use to accentuate the same thing. And
so I'm gonna highlight that again. We just
did this. Like I said, I read over
the recent,
not recent, the article Whitney wrote about who
was a terrorist in Biden's America for the
last American vagabond.
And reading the verb the the verbiage, the
way that he describes this, I will even
go through the document that, by the way,
the White House has deleted. I only just
realized that Biden's domestic terrorism document. I think
because they don't want you to recognize how
it's the same execution with a few different
flavoring points of left and right,
but show you that this is going in
that same direction and where this is inevitably
ending up if we don't, as Americans, stand
up and express that we care more about
our foundational
the fabric of this country, the our constitutional
rights, the many different things we all feign
and point to and scream about until it
comes to some kind of partisan block or
some kind of team sport politics division.
I like to believe that's not the majority.
That's what I believe. But day by day,
it's with all the noise and, you know,
becomes difficult to see that.
Now let's start with, one thing I wanted
you to see.
This is somebody who's often in our chat.
I don't see you there today. We've been
a been a mod and it's come in
our chat for quite a long time. I
was going back and looking,
oh, because recently I showed you yesterday, and
I might even have the image still. There's
been a whole thing going around about re
signing up for, yeah, I think it's right
here, for YouTube. You know? Because we're we're
letting everybody back on because we realized our
mistake, whatever, you know, the whole thing, even
though it kind of ended up being
for some of them, like Jones, for example,
got it deleted again, which,
I mean, you really can't tell by now
that these people are literally, like, the best
friend of the narrative for your government and,
you know, like, literally the people that are
shoehorning the whole thing in for what they're
trying to accomplish. That's my opinion, but
I'd like to believe it's pretty clear.
Things like that, I think, are meant to
make a statement about, you know, where are
the ones being suppressed when clearly that's not
really what's
happening. But my point is I recently went
back to check on it again, and it
simply says this now. The channel won't be
put back on YouTube. We've taken a careful
look at your channel again and confirmed that
it violates. Remember, this was all about myocarditis
being caused, like, the the overlap of the
two things. That's really what this came down
to. Medical misinformation about something that we can
literally prove is, like, the most provable point
of the conversation. Not to go into that
all today. The point was I was in
I was going through that and looking at
the other things associated with that other channel,
and I noticed this. And this is and
what I said, the Eerie Ferry was the
person's name that's a, you know, kind of
a OG in this in our TLav community,
often in the chat, has an entire playlist
of just
going back a long time. 1,359
videos, and I believe that these are all
pirate channels.
Now you'll see them consistently repeated, you know,
when I'm using them, Chiro, whatever, Jonathan Parker.
But if you go back, first of all,
just being able to have a one spot
stop shop for all these videos. I mean,
too bad it's on YouTube, but just doing
that for those that are only on YouTube.
It's all right here for you. Miguel Sanchez.
I just want you to go back and
look at this and look at how long
we've been doing this and how and, you
know, right now, you're gonna see a consistent
kind of this one for a while because
that's what I've been using for a while
since I'm getting, you know, lazy, I guess,
in the in the pirate stream. They haven't
been censoring as much.
But if you really scroll back and get
you know, you'll start to see all sorts
of different channel names. And I just find
that really interesting to see how long we've
been censored and how often, you know, and
and my point as well is that they,
you know, you're not allowed to make new
channels. Well, I haven't made a new channel.
We're just basically, you know, the whole matrix
style broadcasting our pirate radio through their prop
platform. And I know that bugs them. I've
seen comments. I've seen engagement. I've seen efforts
to stop it. We're gonna keep doing it.
Anyway, thank you to Erie Farrah for putting
this together. So if you guys wanna check
out some of these older ones, and I
believe she's still doing it. She's even at
an, redundancy when it comes up from the
two different channels. Anyway, thank you for doing
that.
Keep that for the show notes. Now one
starting note I want you to see that
will I think it's just important to note.
We talked about this in the other show.
This is the ICE agent. Just quickly show
it to you here.
Who this woman was pleading with him regardless
of the legality around it, just as a
human being. Not to say that he should
have just let the guy go, but the
point is she's going I mean, again, I
don't even understand the reality of the situation
yet.
But how many times they've lied blatantly about
what's going on, I it's very it's basically
my mind a coin flip whether or not
this guy was completely legal and they just
grabbed him for any other reason or not.
I don't know. My point is we've seen
that very many times. She comes up to
him afterward and says, please, please. She's pleading
with him. Please let my let my husband
go.
And she literally
rests.
You'll see it. She puts her hand on
his arm in, like, a show of solid,
like like, please, like, right here. That, right
there.
Literally puts
her arm on his arm going, you know,
plea, not a push. If you watch it,
just very, very gentle saying, please, please.
And he picks her up and literally suplexed,
I guess, whatever you call you know, throws
her on the ground
in front of her children in the middle
of all these people. Now I don't care
what circumstance you're talking about. That is so
wildly out of bounds for what they are.
These these are these are supposed to be
people that are more scrutinized than anybody. The
upholders of the law. Right? Obviously, that's not
what this is. Really, never has been for
most people in this situation. Just be honest
about it going back a long way. Police
have always abused their power. There's good, there's
bad, but my opinion, it usually slants to
the bad with bad power structures leading the
charge, which has been our case for a
long time.
This guy's now been held accountable at least
for the lead from duty, which I think
that's what you're gonna get in situations like
this. I'm happy to see that. I just
thought I'm very what that shows you, and
I think this is why I'm starting with
this,
this shows you that do you do you
really think they care? I don't think a
Biden or a Trump care. I don't think
they care about any of this stuff. This
is a reaction because people are upset. If
they thought they had the momentum and they
thought everybody was behind what they were doing,
they wouldn't be doing this. This is a
step too far, And they took they got
rid of him because there was a massive
amount of outrage just from just from a
human sense. Just going, I mean, what what's
wrong with you guys? What you could tell
by the guy's face, by what he did,
the way he reacted, the way he said
afterward.
He hates these people. You can tell in
the way he's reacting. It's my opinion, but
you can tell why that he was he
waited for the smallest opening to go after
her
with absolute
hate and violence.
Again, hate my opinion. Violence, you can see.
But I just think it's interesting that they
responded to this, relieved of his current duties.
I mean, if I were, I'd sue him
for assault. I mean, there's no reason that
should have ever happened regardless of what the
circumstances were before. She didn't break any law.
Right? So it just kills me. But I
think that's important to think about is they
and despite all the everything's fine, house on
fire, kind of cat turd people out there
that are just like, this is the greatest
thing ever. We're winning everything. When I don't
think even the vast majority of Republicans even
come close to that opinion,
This is the reality. You crack through the
door when you see that. That's my opinion,
but I think you can see that as
you look close enough.
Now also,
this is the the story we're gonna end
with today, last segment anyway. I just wanna
plant it in your mind.
This
is Time magazine from today. Trump deploys troops
to Portland,
authorizes full force if necessary.
Now I I kinda have issue with unless
it happened over the last couple so many
hours, typical kind of mainstream media reporting. As
far as I can tell, it hasn't technically
happened yet. As it says, president Trump has
announced on Saturday that he had directed the
Pentagon to deploy troops to Oregon. Now you
tell me in the chat, unless I'm missing
a report that just happened, I I was
under the impression that the reports had gone
out, but they haven't officially deployed them, which
is where we're at at the AP article
at the end of the show today. But
if that's changed, somebody let me know because
that will definitely change my discussion.
But the point was, they deployed them and
giving them authority
to use full force
if necessary.
I mean, just in what world does this
make sense to anybody? I mean, just this
out this this kind of weird haze of
just its evil Democrats doing anything we act
upon. It's just absolutely
we've lost the plot. We've allowed Americans who
are blind, radical. And I mean, I'm only
getting into, like, extreme and radical, like the
terrorism and left and right. I'm just talking
about what the word means. People that have
taken this to extreme levels
that you're so angry. It's like that that
guy, the guy and that woman, that's what
that is. You feel so worked up and
pent up about whatever they've
created in front of you, whatever they convinced
you is everybody on the bad side. And
any grievance you have is because evil left
ideology to where you will
allow
the government to take actions that are not
just unconstitutional,
but are borderline
I mean, not what we pretend we are
as this country.
Full force if necessary means that if they
act or if they feel justified, they can
murder somebody. They can shoot you in the
street, and we already have seen the way
these people are reacting. Now, of course, they're
gonna say, well, here's the point. Do you
think if somebody's life was threatened, if Trump
didn't say full force is necessary, they wouldn't
respond with force? You see my point? We
all know that they feel justified if they're
threatened.
They can say that because they feel like
you might have done something and they felt
threatened and they'll shoot people. We see this
every day,
especially with these, like, appointed
barely peep police officer ICE people. They're just
scooping up off the streets.
So now when he says full force if
necessary, that's an that you don't need to
say that if your point is if my
life is threatened because that's already standard operating
procedure. So he's simply giving them the nod
to take full force on people who might
just be protesting, who might just be like,
this is where you know that fuzzy line
begins
because we've already seen it. I'm not saying
I know what's gonna happen, but when you
put these kind of clowns out there that
are reacting irrationally like that because they feel
a brown person or a country is why
we're all gonna die tomorrow, sort of the
equivalent of they're all creating climate change, so
we're all gonna die tomorrow. The left and
the right are both playing this game where
everything's coming to a head, and if we
don't act right now, we're all gonna die
in some way or another, or the whole
country will be destroyed, or Muslim terrorists will
take over tomorrow, and it's all this hyper
and at some level, you could argue there's
a level of truth to some things around
this.
But I can point to very clearly one
group, one country out there that absolutely does
things like that. Might not think that's where
it connects back to, but my point is
it's not, in any case, a justification to
say, therefore,
ignore the constitution.
Therefore, pass laws or actions or deploy the
military in ways that do not align with
our core values. This is what my main
point is gonna be today. The same thing
I keep talking about,
principles.
And I really think this has to carry
through for us today, guys, because this is
the abuse of everything we're dealing with. There's
no world in which if we believe in
the constitution and we understand the law or
the constitution and our existence and the law
and how all of that is meant to
bound
the government,
not the other way around. This is not
there for us to be protect protected for
for them to be protected from us. Everything
exists to make sure it puts restraints on
government power. They've kinda flipped that on its
ear to where now we're arguing that it's
to keep them safe from everybody else.
And apparently, that's fighting for freedom, that's liberty,
that's you fight in the deep state as
you build it out. You know, it's it
we've lost the plot if we can't see
this. And so my my point is, if
we find a situation where there's something happening,
and I'll make this point about Loomer and
others as we get through that point,
let's just say people are abusing the situation.
Let's say somebody is creating a secret background
network of people that are meant to infiltrate
and overthrow and, you know, whatever else you
think is happening.
That I'm sure that's going on in the
world. How much how much you wanna bet?
Our government's doing that all over the world.
The point is if and when somebody breaks
the law, whatever that looks like in any
context and, yeah, I can argue there's a
nuance to whether we argue laws are unconstitutional,
but let's start with step one before we
get into the weeds, because I agree with
that. But let's just start with the basic
reality that if a law is broken,
enforce the law.
It's not very complicated.
Now, anything over the top of that, where
they go, well, they're doing this and wink
wink also why I started with that clip,
by the way. We see it building, we
just don't know how to stop it. The
point was they're acting within their constitutional rights,
but we think they're doing we're like, they're
wink wink doing it just below the radar
in ways that we can't arrest them for,
but are building to terrorism. That's what her
point was on Biden's side of it. And
so what was the argument? Well, we have
to remove those barriers. We have to remove
those rights or create justification for why it
won't matter in certain circumstances.
Enter Donald Trump. And that's exactly what he's
carrying out.
So if it's a principle and it's about
the constitution or it's about, you know, someone's
breaking the law,
charge them with that and be done with
that. The idea that you allow the government
to expand out its power to create some
construct for why you might also be guilty
regardless of whether you broke the law under
the current reality, is insane. It's over the
top. It's government overreach. And it's exactly what
we said about the left, just like it's
happening with the right. And so, I'll make
this point as we go through continually.
If we can't decide to on the side
of our principles, we're gonna lose everything.
And they are sure as hell using that
against us. It's the same thing like fire
in the theater, like anything else. You can
make very rational,
very justifiable
arguments for why you might wanna ignore
shall not be infringed,
inalienable constitutional rights. But you see, those things
don't make any sense because if they shall
not be infringed, if they're inalienable, then that
doesn't seem possible.
But it sure sounds like it makes sense.
Right? It sure sounds like they're selling on
something that's gonna be in your benefit until
it's used against you, until the other side
comes in and does it back, or however
this always goes.
So I'm sure I'm gonna make this point
probably 15 more times before this
goes one way or the other. I hope
hopefully, it's that Americans pay attention and we
start to call out the problem regardless of
what side that it takes place on.
So
as he deploys military in or about to
deploy to Portland and get and the real
point, guys, is not for immigration.
Right? Not for not for illegal immigrants, but
for domestic terrorism.
That's what the that is what exact I'll
read you the executive order.
Or rather what he's pointing to, but I'll
read you the the statements of deployment and
what he said on his social media. This
is about domestic terrorism.
Now what they're claiming, and this is the
weird way they keep playing this extension of
it. This is what they it's just building
out the same narrative as they're saying, okay.
Well, we're gonna deploy these people to defend
the buildings and ice things that you're attacking.
Which so it's, like, connected to immigration, but
it's just domestic terrorists who are angry about
okay.
So, at what point does someone break the
law? And if they broke the law, why
don't you just arrest them? Why create this
weird, abstract, well, we already went over that
because they're building Now, even if you think
it's justified to do that,
the idea is that you're allowing more power.
And even if they act right now, they're
doing it in ways that you think are
rational justified, and even they mean to do
so. What happens when the next Democrat comes
into power and they apply the same system
back at you? And if you actually only
think that it's just the Democrats or and
vice versa, you think it's only the Republicans,
are we not able to rationalize or recognize
how eventually that will flip around the other
way? You know, this is why a lot
of us are just so fed up with
the game because these things are like square
one basic logic,
and
the screamers at the top of the paradigm
seem to carry the day, at least in
regard to how they frame the whole conversation.
Again, I'm of the mind that's not even
close to happening anymore. I'm of the mind
that most Americans are somewhere right in the
middle of some left and right leaning in
different ways, but completely not in what the
left right conversation is anymore.
I'm very, very convinced of that.
So keeping this in mind,
deploying military with full force if necessary
to a place that has it's not overwhelmed
with crime. There's plenty of crime to point
out, but there's plenty of right now, I
could point to many different Republican cities that
are way more full of crime than Portland.
It's because they claim it's the
origin point of Antifa. That's really what it
comes down to. They're not saying that out
loud in many ways. Some of the commentators
are. But full force if necessary to go
after what appears to be the left should
they protest against what's happening
and where that leads us and what will
happen if an event really does kick out.
Or what what about the fact that we
all recognize the government in its history very
clearly? The FBI in in time very importantly,
documentedly has used false events to create action.
Anyway, we'll come back to this.
I wanna start with Comey to make sure
we see where this update is because it's
really interesting to me that this, of all
these conversations, seems to be, I mean, just
a very obvious like, what was what's the
right term for it? Like, Like, it's not
gonna go anywhere. Like, it seems to be,
like, what would it be? A red herring,
I guess? Like, something that is thrown in
in order to make you think it's well,
no. I guess that's meant to that's like
a head fake. So this is something they
want you to look at. They want you
to feel is going to gain momentum. I
argue so you're not paying attention to all
the things that they're failing you on. Even
and then even then, my point is this
is not seemingly going to amount to anything.
I certainly hope it does in case you
missed the beginning because I think this person
is a criminal. Legal legal expert sees no
viable case against James Comey after jump DOJ
indictment.
So this is a Fox commentator, and it
simply says the f an f b a
former FBI director James Comey,
as he publicly defends himself against a grand
jury indictment, one legal analyst and former assistant,
US tur hold on. Did I
okay. Good. I was making sure I didn't,
I think maybe I missed it. I accidentally
closed, an image for the podcast. Anyway, I'll
just read what I have highlighted here. That
was my point as earlier. This whole article
refreshed while I was starting, and so I
lost the highlighting. But that's why I take
screenshots.
Anyway,
as former as as Comey publicly defends himself
against a grand jury indictment, which again, let's
not forget, indictments are accusations, guys. That's all
it is. Yeah. There's some level of evidence,
but you you ask any anybody, it's very
easy to maneuver these things with basically nothing.
You could patch together a really cool argument
that judges will go, okay. There might be
something there. Go ahead.
But then nothing happens. This is I mean,
again, what we say yesterday. You point to
me the last person in any position like
this was held accountable
left and right, far back I mean, you
should point who any. I can't remember anybody
outside of very, very few examples that really
had nothing to do with things like this.
Clinton
I mean, you go you go on forever,
but bottom line,
indictments are just accusations,
and it's easy to patch together. And I
think this is done so in a way
that is based on something that is almost
guaranteed to fail. One legal analyst and former
assistant US attorney argues the case needs to
be thrown out. And he says, I don't
she says, I don't think there's a case.
Fox News contributor said, it oh, I thought
it was a girl. Andrew McCarthy
said on mornings with Maria, says the Russiagate
stuff, as I'm as big a critic of
that probably as there is, they say. I
wrote a book about it. I think it
was a disgrace and history will remember it
that way. This indictment is not about that.
And if you're actually again, like most of
these things, if you're honest about this,
I mean, it's not like it's even debatable,
guys. Trump has been speaking out loud about
why he wants to go after his enemies.
Now you may feel like that makes sense
because you I mean, look, I'll I'll be
I agree. They did manipulate politically
to go after Trump. But just like they
all do back and forth all the time,
it doesn't make any of it okay. Yes.
They're crimes. Charge them for it. I agree.
That's why I think you should be in
jail. My point, though, is that clearly, this
is not new. It's constant how they do
this. You know, they they politicize everything, go
back and forth. I mean and so Trump
now comes back in and you feel justified
because he did do that. But so if
he's just doing the same kind of thing
back using this and even to it this
is what I was saying before, to a
much more severe degree. You get stuff like
this in kind of a broad scale that
left does and it seems crazy, then the
right comes in and does it in a
very specific way that pushes the the envelope
way farther.
And that's how it goes back and forth
and back and forth, and sometimes that reverses.
But overall,
you have a situation
where he's going after him because the guy
did do something, but he's doing it in
a way that is weaponizing the justice system.
And how do you think that's not gonna
spin back around the same way and go
right back after you? Right? And put right
back all the January 6 and go after
everybody else. You know, it's just this game
of teeter totter.
And what that who who does that help?
It helps the power structure. It helps them
keep us fighting ourselves and helps them build
their power over our lives, as well as
whatever foreign agent seems to be ultimately driving
a lot of this.
And and this is and then, again, the
indictment indictment not being about that.
He said point blank that he wants to
go after them. Whether they're guilty or not.
I don't know. Let them find out. Well,
that's not how this is supposed to work.
You don't come at them and hope that
it all works out in court. You have
a case,
and you know you have evidence that they're
guilty. And you bring that case, and then
you hope that the the court system works
out and they don't have a defense that'll
stop it. You don't just throw it in
there and hope it all works out. That
is the weaponization of the system. That is
creating a world where they will go after
anybody for any reason. And guess what? That
is despotate. That is authoritarianism.
That is a dictator.
Unaccountable
situations where they can go after you for
any reason, and then they got court systems
that are bowing to them because they know
they'll go after them if they don't. And
then you end up in prison for no
reason or, you know, sent to a foreign
country for no justification. Yeah. We've already gotten
there. Comey has declared himself not afraid of
Donald Trump's justice department after being indicted Thursday
for allegedly lying to congress and obstructing congressional
proceeding it writes.
Quote, the indictment seems to be premised on
something not that's not true, which is that
former that, Andrew McCabe,
former deputy director, said that Comey authorized him
to leak to The Wall Street Journal.
If you look closely at what McCabe said
that's what she's saying or he is saying,
actually. Is it,
Andrew McCarthy?
If you look closely at what what he
said,
what McCabe said was that he directed to
a
leak to the Wall Street Journal and told
Comey after it about it after the fact,
which I'm sure plenty of people will disagree
with or because people you know, the bottom
line is that I don't think regardless, it's
gonna end up in their favor because they're
part of the club and you're not in
it. Quote, so it's true that Comey never
authorized in it in the sense of okaying
it before it happened. The legal expert expanded.
So I don't see how they can make
that case.
Well, they're sure as hell gonna try. And
just like the courts have been doing around
all their immigration cases, they're gonna laugh in
their face when they patch together something clumsy
because Bondi, Pongino, and Patel
do not seem to be able to tie
their shoes, let alone present a case that's
not based on anything other than absolute fabrication.
But, of course, Trump comes out and goes,
great job, Cash. You're nailing it, as he's,
like, getting ready to send him under the
bus. Thank you, he says, for your leadership,
mister president. Proud of the brave men and
women at the FBI for their pursuit of
the truth.
Of course, what he's saying is great job
going after Comey, which I wanted you. He's
just saying good job for doing what I
told you to do even though it's hurting
your career. It's like the rest of them.
They are blind, absolute followers of Trump. Most
everybody who's in this movement
who's, like, adherent to this top they're they're
Trump first, not MAGA first. And I'm gonna
show you some points about that. Very prominent
people day by day are going, you know
what? I'm not a complete moron. And I
have principles, and I'm sorry. I have to
call this out.
I know you're out there. You're afraid to
do it. I'm sure. But there's a lot
of you out there that know this is
wrong and just choose to side with the
team. And I think that's pathetic. I think
that you're better than that.
They have convinced you that that's how that's
supposed to go.
Freedom Memes writes, we need to release the
list.
Vance says, Bonnie says, the list is on
my desk. Cash says, there is no list.
Trump says, the list is fake. Made by
mom. Right? Point is, Epstein list. Right? Because
everybody's like I mean, if you go through
these comments, guys, it's hilarious how many people
and everything they do every single day is
just like, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. And they
pretend like it's not happening.
This is one of the people I was
talking about. I reached out to see if
I, have her come on for interviews. She
did say she likely could. She's checking with
her team.
The patriotic blonde who has, 90,000 followers says,
I'm a three time Trump voter who worked
his presidential campaign and can categorically state that
you are both an embarrassment to me and
a disgrace to the oath you swore to
uphold.
Resign.
This person says, I could not be happier
with how things are going. Complain all you
want. All you're gonna do is lose followers.
This person says, like I care about followers.
See, this is the mindset. It's like, really?
You care about, we care about the truth.
I mean, I do. I it sounds like
she does too. And it says, do you
see any monetization links on any of my
social media accounts? I say what I want
because no one owns me. Good luck with
that opium addiction. Now what's funny is I
do think just just glancing, I think she
has lost quite a lot of followers in
the back because so many people in this
movement
are just blindly adhered to the team, guys.
Hopefully, she gains a lot more from the
honest community out here that might not even
be on Twitter. But, I mean, our I
mean, I I think it's maybe the the
79, 77,000
people that follow us that exist on this
platform, and that's where it stops because we're
not going up anymore.
Who knows?
But I'm glad to see people calling this
out. I mean, if you look back through,
you know, her her statement, her her account,
you know, very much a mag and a
pro Trump and then recognized there was a
problem.
She says here, and now we are on
the brink of World War three. I'm a
three time Trump voter and a constitutional conservative.
I worked this presidential campaign, she says,
and now I regret all of the above.
As from Epstein to Israel, he has completely
betrayed us all. I mean, who can disagree
with that? It's just people like Benny Johnson
and Nick Sorter and Cat Turner out there
going, we're doing everything the best way. I
mean, you can't disagree. They haven't they I
mean, not only are they not giving the
Epstein list, they've lied to us repeatedly and
been caught lying.
Pretty sure the Israel war is still going
and Ukraine.
You know? But so she says after that,
and before anyone starts, no. I would not
have voted for Kamal Harris. And no. Things
would not have been worse had she won.
Now who knows? I can't agree with, I
don't know. I think I've been the same.
I think both of them are the same
point, which is kinda where she goes with
that. Betrayal to the oath is betrayal to
the oath. It's a uni party. I realize
that now. And if I knew that, if
I knew what I do now, I would
not have voted at all. And that see,
that's where we end up. Because when you
realize that not only they've taken away abstention,
which is your right to be able to
put down a vote where that means I'm
abstaining because I think the the process is
broken. And then that's when you'd find out
the 60% of the country that doesn't participate
would jump up and be like, yes. We
all see it. You're lying.
Watch if that ever comes around. But also
I mean, assuming they even count them accurately
and they'll lie to you.
But
they take that vote away. They create a
false binary, and they create you know, it
do what do you the the only way
to not lose a rigged game is to
not play.
And she says, hey. If I find recharge
that account, I found a couple for you,
and shows FBI.
And this person says, stop identifying as MAGA.
You're a devil in human's clothing. You see
how this works?
So she's America. She wants to make America
great again. That's obvious. And she already she
and her she has the same political sense.
She believes in the constitution.
But she is no longer part of the
team because you're willing to call out Trump.
So what does that mean? Is it Trump
first or is it America first?
Clearly, that's Trump first if she still believes
America need like, okay. You if let's just
say somebody doesn't like Trump, but they still
wanna be MAGA. To them, you're not allowed.
That speaks for itself, guys. And I don't
believe that's the majority of conservatives.
Now, quote that I this is usually attributed
to Lincoln. I don't it can't be verified
that technically where it came from. Something that
Bob Marley repeated in a song says, you
can fool some people sometimes, but you can't
fool all the people all the time.
Now think it's important to think about because
it's a very I think that is historically
very true. Right? People can be fooled. You
get fooled all the time. All of us
have been fooled in our lives. But you
can't fool everyone all the time. Right now,
that's what we're seeing. We're seeing the reality
that they need to fool their entire base
because they're
spinning in their face,
saying it's raining. You know? And so the
point is that you can't. People are starting
to wake up. Because not everybody is a
blind, childish follower. I don't think that's the
majority of people, my opinion.
And at some point,
you find a breaking point. Right? And when
you got the modern day goebles like this,
coming up and just constantly lying to you
in the most childishly hyperbolic ways, it's kinda
easy to see.
This guy
comes out and says, it's truly one of
the most heinous things that has ever happened
in the history of our country.
What do you think? What could that possibly
be? COVID nineteen?
The genocide of the Native Americans? I I
mean, you could go off for, like, a
100
severely
crazy events. Right? He says, James Comey, as
the head of the FBI, tried to lay
a trap to remove a duly elected president.
Oh, oh, that's what it was. Right? The
the the lead an actual coup. Oh, okay.
So
then why did you only arrest him for
false statements?
So you're telling me false statements and the
rest you can't even prove and that seems
to be falling apart is the most truly
one of the most heinous things in this
country?
The guy's a complete clown. He is doing
this because whatever it's the same way Trump
acts. Whatever their current focus is is the
most important thing you've ever seen in your
life in any solar system in the world.
We are, you know, just go in such
a ridiculous
abstract way.
Sure. You could think it's important, but to
pretend it's one of the most heinous things
we've ever seen in this country's history is
an insult
to anybody who has suffered by some of
the most heinous things that our government's done
and others have done. It's just an insult
to your intelligence.
You know? So he wants you to believe,
by the way, that something like this is
less for call me lying in front of
congress is more heinous than, for example,
as Pete Pete Hegset says, under my direction,
the soldiers who fought at the Battle of
Wounded Knee will keep their medals.
This decision is final. Their place in history
settled, you know, until the next administration does
something else. These people are so all full
of hubris and and, you know, the pomp,
pomp,
pomp what do you say? Pompidity?
They're pompous.
The point is that simply, yeah, five my
decision's final until the next person changes that.
You know? These people are ridiculous, but what
he's talking about should bother you. I don't
even know why they would feel the need
to do this. And I think it stems
back to some kind of weird,
you know, whether there's some I it it
you wanna call it racism or do you
wanna call it some kind of I mean,
I don't even know how else you would
frame it, that you're taking the side of
something unnecessary
that goes back to some well documented
atrocities as David Derek,
excuse me. Derek Bro says, the military killed
and raped natives who had already surrendered.
These are killers,
not heroes.
I mean, it's a really famous story about
what they did to people at Wounded Knee.
It's a terrible battle. And they're just going,
never mind, because anything America so all they're
showing you is that we're gonna rewrite whatever
we want. We're gonna make our guys the
winners in history because that's what we do.
They're just so lazily open about it.
They just don't we're good. America good. Anything
else bad. So if it's America, then we
win, and we did the right thing. Shut
up. It's like that's they don't even care
that it looks dumb.
I I honestly think it's just they're incompetent,
and they don't even know how to do
anything of any other than that. But it's
just frustrating.
Patrick says at some point, you just have
to assume that he's an actively evil person.
Well, he's doing what he's ordered to do.
It it could be his decision. I doubt
that. But either way, I would agree. They're
all very similar in the way that they
act and think. But he says this was
a massacre of mostly women and children. By
the way, guys, it it's not hard to
look up. And And it's not like, you
know, okay. If you think, oh, well, history
you could of course, we could be lied
to about history. Question it. Right? But go
through go for yourself and do a deep
dive on this topic. And you tell me
that the vast majority of well documented
like, what we have to look at backs
up this story. Other than people trying to
say, you know, look into it for yourself
and you walk away telling me that this
makes sense.
Largely unarmed, one of the most shameful events
in American history.
But, you know, not according to to Goebbels
over there. Call me lying in front of
congress. That's that's the top of the bar.
Okay. Carrie says the right says left wing
extremists are the biggest threat. The left says
right wing extremists are the biggest threat. But
the biggest extremist threats come from the people
in in power
on both the left and the right,
who are building our digital surveillance prison, police
state with shady technocrats,
dragging us trillions deeper into debt slavery, left
or right, by the way, protecting predators,
waging
never ending wars and empowering corrupt regimes, still
both sides, the whole time, perpetuating the corporatocracy
and dividing and conquering the masses so they
stay fixated on left wing and right wing
extremists and not the ones dragging them deeper
into this authoritarian dystopia.
Be lovely if people could just be logical
all the time.
Jason Bachelor, what MAGA thinks the threat to
America is. Now, I I'm talking about whether
he is or not, I'm talking about the
team sport politics.
Not like, for example, the one we just
saw. She was the woman who very much
wants to make America great again, but recognizes
Trump's lying to her. But so the team's
sort of politics. What they think is a
threat to America, Antifa, MS thirteen, immigrants, radical
left, drag queens, George Soros, woke college kids.
But the real threat to America is, APAC,
Palantir, digital IDs, BlackRock, Peter Thiel, technocrats, block
surveillance.
Now you could also include anything that you
think you know, point is the the larger
threats to our way of life.
Now do you think Antifa is a large
threat? Well, if you do, well, go arrest
them if they're breaking the law. Any point
as before? But if you're some abstract shadowy
background,
okay.
Are you sure? Did you prove this? Are
you even if you think that's happening, at
what point did they break the law? If
they're not, then what are we talking about?
You have to understand, like, this we can't
like, it's funny. They've almost turned us all
into exactly what they always pretended we were.
Like, these blind theorists about things that aren't
even really there.
The reality is we should be considering
our the who who's conspiring against us, theorizing
about the people conspiring to put our pea
you know, our lives into some kind of
panopticon,
not abstractly assuming the ways the government need
us to to allow them to control your
life. MS 13, for example, they're gang members.
Yeah. That's that's and by the way, pretty
sure it started in LA.
Arrest them if they break the law. It's
pretty simple. Immigrants,
the idea that we can you know, I
can get into all of these. The radical
left.
If they break the law, put them in
jail. Everything else beyond that
is abstract.
Now APAC, for example, is a lobbying group
that literally funds your politicians to destroy your
country.
There's crimes all over the place. Palantir is
quite literally breaking the law every single day
while they illegally surveil you and absorb all
your information and work with Israel to commit
a genocide. Plenty of crimes there. You get
the point? Now there's crimes you could point
out, but see, in these individual things, you're
getting into abstract,
like, large this would be like saying,
arrest AIPAC for
undermining democracy. It's like, okay. Well, what does
that even mean? What is there a law?
That's what we're doing over here.
They're committing terrorism. Okay. Where? What way? They
break a window? Go arrest the person who
broke the window.
Instead of going, everyone's a terrorist because that
guy did something. Now I'm making it oversimplified,
but the point is still the same. The
principle is the same. Now what Jason writes
is MAGA has no clue who their real
enemy is. And I agree.
One of many of Palantir cozying up next
to a genocidal president of Israel.
Now in regard to Epstein,
because obviously we can't decouple the reality of
Israel and what they're doing in this country
and the Epstein story because it is the
same. If you're truly honest with yourself about
how obvious this is, if you've read Whitney's
books, if you understand the way that this
is even bigger than The United States, but
what this network is
is obvious.
Now whether you wanna argue he was Mossad
agent, CIA agent, or worked for both or
as well as an FBI informant,
it's debatable. Right? Because I can't prove that
he was literally part of this Mossad or
whether he worked for them or not. But
the reality,
as Acosta
said more than once and people have verified
more than once, he was connected to intelligence
in both sides.
So it's obvious to see that this was
a running blackmail network, which is what Israel
has been
that's that is what we tattooed on their,
I mean, you know, a a patch on
their shirt. It is clearly something that they
are constantly seeing, like what's their I'm looking
I can't find the right word. Known for
is a good way to say it, but
there was the point was something you can
document Israel being involved in for a long
time. Blackmail networks and that kind of, like,
espionage
is something they've done for a long time.
Jason Bassler says the well, and to be
clear, The US too. But the reality is
if you look into it, Israel is known
for this kind of thing. The house just
dropped Epstein docs showing Peter Thiel was scheduled
for lunch with Epstein in 2017,
which are some of these are squeaking out.
So what what's funny about this is, okay,
then now we have a new document we
haven't seen before.
Donald Trump, Bondi, you still there? What happened?
I thought you told us there was nothing
else. I thought there was nothing else. Everything
else was victims, Kash Patel. Oops. Here's more.
Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, our bad.
You see where this goes? Now imagine how
much more is still there. So I'm gonna
show you what I'm talking about. It says
years after he became a registered sex offender,
Peter Thiel was having lunch with him, and
so too were plenty of them.
When we say Epstein's friends are building your
future social credit score, we aren't exaggerating.
Anonymous simply points this or whatever the account
is.
I believe this oh, it does look like
the the original.
America is finally united.
Epstein files should be released.
MAGA Republicans, 82. Republicans, 83. Independence, 86. Democrats,
90. Now it's m MS ABC. Regardless, it's
a poll. But what's funny to me
is to see how clearly that everybody's aligned
on this, and I'm talking about average people.
Right? It seems everybody everywhere suddenly wants to
find out whether our governments are breaking the
law. Wow. You know? Because this is the
reality, guys, that they've we've always,
everybody always wants this, but we're only usually
aimed at one side. You know why this
makes sense? Because each side secretly thinks it's
only the other side. It's fantastic.
The reality is it's the government, and this
is what many people are starting to recognize.
But because each side secretly thinks it's only
the other one because of their side's narratives,
everybody wants the files released, which has pretty
much shot them in the foot. Because let's
be real, guys. This is not left or
right. This is the government. That's the only
way you can influence in policy is if
you manipulate the government, not just one side
of it. So this childishly stupid argument that
it's just the Democrat deep state, how does
that even possibly make sense? So you're telling
me the deep state needs to hope Republicans
fall in line with their policies?
I mean, you can't make sense of how
dumb that is. Clearly, it is something that
infiltrates the government to be able to control
the government, not spend decades keeping one side
in check to hope the Republicans don't fall
for it's just silly. But that's what you
get from the classic manipulators out there.
Thomas Massie. If speaker Johnson tries to use
some special parliamentary procedure he's been talking about
this, the different ways he's trying to manipulate
this, and one of them is not allowing
the recent politician to be,
sworn
in. He says to stall the Epstein petition,
Massey said it would also it would require
218 votes. And if you participate in that
vote to sideline the discharge petition, now you're
part of the cover up. Well, that is
what's happening.
First, just I just oh, this just included.
Should've put this somewhere else. Patriot
Blonde says,
you Republicans are wild.
I do think this is incredible. Just this
Thomas Massie,
Liberty score.
Was this from exactly? It looks like the
conservative
review.
A for Thomas Massie. 96%,
and they call him a rhino. Right?
Liberty score, Lindsey Graham, f, 43%,
and they call him MAGA. Why? Because Trump
endorsed him.
See? It's blind following, guys, and I don't
believe that's most conservatives. Then all I'm asking
for is those of you out there who
have principles, who don't like that you're represented
as some child following along, speak up. Show
people that you're not a moron because I
believe that. I fight for that every day
because I know that most Americans are not
this easy to be played. I've seen it
throughout many different times of our conversations. COVID
nineteen should prove that to us.
But
here,
in shocking moment, really American points out, speaker
Johnson refuses
to swear in newly elected democratic
representative,
Grijalva,
who is the the decisive
two hundred and eighteenth vote to sign a
discharge petition to release the Epstein files. Now,
again, maybe this might have changed in the
last couple of hours since I organized the
show. But what what's important about this is
this was the vote that would have changed
that and allowed it to go forward
after the recent kind of down vote in
regard to the thing that was, included around
it. And so the point is that he's
stopping this under the guise that she's you
know, we gotta wait and make sure it's
all confirmed even though he literally just did
so with a republican without doing that. You
know, they're all just that childish. They both
do it. It's not unique to one side,
but it just shows you these people are
kindergarteners acting like that in every context.
What's important to recognize is that she was
going to be on the side of the
releasing of the Epstein files and Mike Johnson
is dragging his feet
or threatening to leave on recess and whatever
else we're talking about. Back in July, New
York Times, speaker Johnson said he would shut
down the house until September to block a
vote on calling for the release of the
Epstein files because that makes you look innocent,
doesn't it?
Elon Musk says there's only one reason to
avoid releasing the Epstein files. Oh, he knows.
Right? He knows because it looks like he's
on it. Here is Bright Allen, and this
is some of the stuff that was recently
released. Epstein's private calendar
shows Steve Bannon,
Peter Thiel,
and lunch with Elon Musk.
Prince Andrew was booked on his jet. These
files were in the DOJ's hands for years.
Why weren't they released until thirty seconds ago?
It's a good question. Why wouldn't have Trump
or anybody else released it? There's no victims
involved here. So, guys, it shows you they're
lying to you every single moment. But again,
that was easy to see from day one
if you're not a completely blind follower.
So this is the thing I think thought
was interesting.
Or what's well, I'll just show you I'll
just go through them real quick. Now this
by the way, this is screenshots, but this
is very prominent conversation. That's why you could
find this,
let me see real quick. I thought I
actually grabbed one that had the
oh, maybe not.
The point was this was a very prominent
this this has been released and discussed.
So, look it up for yourself and you'll
find it very quickly. Usually, I I include
it, but I was kinda rushing this part
this morning. Anyway, the point was
you could see launch of Peter Thiel. And
of course, they also have it
blocked.
Ask yourself why that is.
Right? I mean, you could argue it's names
or
but is it though? You know? I mean,
I I don't think so. I think some
of these things are just details that are
important to hide.
Breakfast with Steve Bannon. I'm sure he's not
happy about that.
This one,
reminder, Elon Musk to Ireland,
December 6.
Is this still happening?
I find that very interesting too.
Prince Andrew.
This is not new, though. Anybody who's already
paid attention, this stuff's all pop you already
knew all this. Maybe maybe myself, say for
Steve Bannon. That's first I've seen him mentioned
in there. But I'm not, you know, that
may I'm not the best person to go
into all the real time details. But overall,
like, in regard to, you know, like, my
point is I'm very immersed in this. I
have a lot of insight over a lot
of people, but somebody like Whitney Webb would
be the best one to go to for
recalling every single name, for example, with her
photographic memory.
But Elon Musk to the island.
Why, again, in which case you missed it,
the fact that this just came out
shows you that they've been lying to you.
There's nothing in that they should have hold
back on other than the fact that there
are a bunch of names that are connected
to Donald Trump.
And this says it also says party with
Bill Gates.
There I mean, it's just not hard to
see this. This is our point about this
being a larger thing of of not one
side or the other.
Evan loves warf says
frames Elon Musk who's responding to this as
sky sky news reports that that Elon Musk
and Prince Andrew named in the latest Epstein
files release. It's yes. It's very true. It's
easy to look up. And Elon, Elon says,
shame on Sky News for this utterly misleading
headline. Anyone pushing the false narrative deserves complete
contempt. Epstein tried to get me to go
to his island, and I refused. Yet they
named me even before Prince Andrew who did
visit. Okay.
I we read exactly what it said. So
you in the release of files, your name
is there. That's all it says. It's not
misleading at all. You just don't like what
it suggests. The point is we can't prove
whether you win or not. You claim you
didn't. So the fact is, yes, 100% accurate
title.
Yes. He was named in the recent filed
release. They're not claiming he's on the Epstein
list, which is you which they get blend
together. That simply means a list of people
that were actually trap you know, bought trafficked
women
that they still won't release for you even
though Massey and the rest have already told
you they could.
This is true. So I find it very
interesting. And what's even funnier is Evan says,
help someone is doing to me what I
do constantly.
Perfect. It's true. It's exactly what he does,
or all of them for that matter.
Now on top of that, this came out
today or yesterday.
Jeffstein,
Jeffrey Epstein accuser Maria Farmer says she reported
Donald Trump to the FBI in 1996
and 2006 for a disturbing encounter. At some
point, we should probably just play these, but
if they're really
long but I include this yet again. This
is Epstein victim, Maria Farmer, speaks with Whitney
Webb, full phone call part one and part
two.
And she goes over all this stuff. Now
as I said before, there this is Whitney
Webb being contacted by Maria Farmer and just
wanted to have a phone call. Well, really,
the original point was just to have a
phone call to kind of, you know, discuss
what they might wanna do, and they ended
up recording it. And she was okay with
us just publishing it. And so really just
her story. Right? There's not that's not something
we can verify every single detail she says
because you can't. It's her story about what
happened. And that's very reportable, especially within context
of this conversation. And that's all we ever
framed it as. Her her statements about what
she went through. And it gets just amazing
the pushback you get from stuff like this.
But I find it relevant also to realize
how little,
little, little engagement it gets. This was pinned
to the top of my account all day.
290
views.
I mean, it's just it's just transparent to
see how obviously this is being suppressed.
But watch it for yourself that knows that
know how to reach the stuff on our
website, even though it's blocked in 17 different
ways. It's important to
hear. And this is just funny to me.
Really? This is the what is it called
again? Oh, man. I'm liking on the name
of the show.
What was that called?
That's so crazy.
Oh, it's right there.
Wheel of fortune.
And it says, release the e and then
blank, blank, blank, files. Trump says, I heart
or Earnhardt, excuse me. And it's it's I
mean, I had I wasn't even sure if
this was real at first.
Yes. Donald Trump is claiming he's gonna declassify
the Amelia
Earhart. I don't know if that's a joke.
I mean, I it just shows you how
they just think we're that's easy to play,
guys. It's lazy. I mean, look. Is there
possibly something interesting about what they know around
the story? Sure. There's a whole theory, but
it's it's like, why of all things would
that, unless it relates back to some weird
espionage or a maybe who knows? Or aliens.
Who knows?
And maybe it's super interesting. But are we
gonna pretend that that's even remotely close to
the kind of things that we're actually dealing
with right now? Like, the idea that your
government might be blackmailed by a foreign power?
But here's some interesting conspiracy theory content.
You know know what I mean? Like, it's
just I don't mean that in a derogatory
way. I'm I would be interested. I'd love
to see it if they actually give you
something that matters. But are we gonna pretend
like they'd ever give you anything that would
actually hurt them?
It just seems embarrassing. Now on that same
speaking of embarrassing, same point I did before.
I'm glad people are calling this out.
Kash Patel will literally
tweet evidence
to jeopardize an active investigation.
He tweeted out the bullets.
I mean, hours, it was in the middle.
No one had seen this.
He jumps ahead and everything, tweets it out.
You know, a preliminary investigation, but here's what
we found.
Right?
Isn't that don't they always say we're not
allowed to comment and ongoing? Okay.
So, he can literally tweet evidence that will
jeopardize an active investigation, but will tell you
his hands are tied when it comes to
releasing the Epstein files.
This is just incompetence, guys. That's what this
is.
You tweeted that out. You made you made
your I mean, you were he's he clearly
seems so desperate to be seen as the
one in charge, to be seen as the
one giving you the information. I'm running this
when I have a seeking suspicion, he's not
even in the loop.
That's just my just
my gut for some reason with what I
see. But either way, regardless, I know I
find it hard to believe quite honestly, but
it's what I feel,
is that he will put this out there
in that moment when there's an ongoing investigation.
And any any detective will tell you that
that's absurd, especially since that may be a
clue that they don't wanna release because that
might interest them in regard to what they're
and look. And I'm just on the other
side of it. I'm as an average person,
I hate that they do that, but I
understand why that happens if they're honestly trying
to find the coin. So it's just crazy
to me
that these people are even there.
But don't worry because the important stuff is
being handled. Right? Carrie Lake wants you to
know that we're on the real stuff, guys.
Don't worry, you know, breaking down the real
stories for you, finding out the real important
stuff.
For example, like, who was behind the escalator
gate as, Laura Loomer wants you to know.
Because it's real important, guys. And and what
it really ultimately shows you, as Kerry Lake
will tell
you, is that the globalist deep state
is on the run, guys. It is on
the run.
On because we did not wanna let this
moment pass by. What happened on Tuesday, what
Donald Trump did on Tuesday
resets the agenda for this country, and that's
why they hate him, and that's why they
want him gone. And Oh, you mean is
fumbling, sprawling conversation and accusations?
Like like, as literally, like, if you wanna
waste your time and watch him on that
disgusting I mean, guys, he's being made fun
of all around the world.
Other than in this kind of weird fake
bubble on Fernity, whatever this platform is, guys,
it's embarrassing. And it's not my it's not
like I hate Trump and I hate, like,
I'm going. I think they're all as
authoritarian and problematic as any other government. The
point is that, clearly, what he did was
stand up there
and rant
about people that heard him and people that
went after him and what he did and
how great he is and and how the
time and now someone's in trouble for the
teleprompter. I mean, it was as an American,
it's embarrassing. Just as embarrassing as watching Biden
up there barely able to pronounce his words.
It's the same thing.
So my my thing is that I the
fact that they want to frame this as
all of them did, like, before it was
even done. Jones and Johnson, they came out
and said, this is the most iconic UN
speech in history because that was the goal,
to reset the thing even though it didn't
happen. Now, yes, is it possible that they
messed with that to mess with him? Sure.
I wouldn't doubt that at all. But it
also happened to three other people who were
in the middle of their speeches about Israel's
genocide. So
reconcile that for me. Make sense of it.
Who's gonna go after Trump because he's speaking
out in in, you know, support,
which would make sense in a larger conversation,
but then also happen to people who were
speaking about the genocide.
Funny how those don't get shared together.
And that's why they that's why they cut
the teleprompter. That's why they've tried to trip
him up on the escalator. That's Oh, and
by the way, neither of which you can
even remotely prove that anyone was involved with
anything and it could have been a glitch.
Do I do I know that for sure?
No. But here's my point. These are people
on a mainstream channel and a member of
congress, I believe. Right? Is she still I
don't even know. She still and, you know,
you can make fun of me. I don't
these people are very unimportant to me in
the long run,
are on this platform
telling you that they know that happened. Because
it works for them. Why not? They just
wanted to go after him and trip him
up. You can't prove that. So now you're
literally creating a conspiracy.
You're theorizing about a conspiracy against Trump for
an elevator escalator, excuse me, and a teleprompter.
So we're the conspiracy theorist. Right? As we
break down the information we can prove, you
know, and they're good. We should all be
able to theorize about conspiracies. But the stupid
thing is to come out and act like
you know for sure, just like that.
That's why they cut the microphone. They didn't
want people to hear his strong powerful message
of we the people.
Not the globalist, but we the people. And
Right. We the people. You know, except Muslims
though. But we the people, except Palestinians.
But We the people, guys.
Except except unless you're on the left though,
if you're not the left. But We the
people, other than Antifa, those guys aren't part
of it. Get the point? But all of
us together accept all of those groups.
These people are clowns. I thought it was
it was, really gonna it's really gonna change
the way the global structure works. We hope
so. And imagine, by the way, all things
Oh my god. Did she really say that?
I mean, think about what she just suggested
that Trump's rambling speech
that is really embarrassing to watch, don't take
my word for it, go watch, is going
to change international
policy.
Like, really, the I mean, look. A great
speech barely does that.
This is just hyperbolic nonsense, and it shows
you how completely in the clouds people are
or desperate depends on how you wanna look
at it. Structure works. We hope so. It
was, really gonna it's really gonna change the
way the global structure works. We hope so.
And imagine, by the way, all things being
equal, if that happened to Joe Biden and
there was no teleprompter,
he wouldn't be able to deliver the speech,
Dom. Probably not. Who cares, though? Why are
we talking about that? Right?
Biden was so dumb. Right? Yeah. High five.
That's all they're doing.
That's just it's silly. It's childish. But I
agree. Biden's an idiot. But what point does
that have with anything? Why would that even
be brought up in a conversation? Why? Because
Trump because secretly underneath it, they know Trump
was embarrassed. That's why.
My opinion. Well, Trump is not joking. The
stairs just stopped on him. That would have
been really bad. That's a good point. Carrie
Oh, he's an old man tripping. What? How
funny. If he was so ridiculous.
And and Trump even had to lie about
what happened. He pretended they were on it.
You could watch the video. They hadn't even
stepped on it yet. It's just so funny
to me. People are so childish.
They just can't
be honest about the dumbest things.
But that's partisan politics for you guys, which
is, by the way, very clearly represented by
all the screaming partisans, the TeamSport politics types.
Now as Elektron at the bottom points out,
US media barely touches Epstein links with the
Israeli intelligence,
very clearly doing their best to keep away
from that obvious overlapping point.
But as Bondi says, whether you're a former
FBI director, whether you're a former head of
intel community, whether you're a current state or
local elected official, whether you're a billionaire, she's
just specifically naming without naming the people they're
aiming at, which are all Democrats. Right? That's
just what she's doing. Everything's on the table
except our people, except, you know, except everything
that Trump says have to look at, except,
except, except, except. But you lefties, everybody,
unless actually you're an Israeli official arrested in
Nevada for child sex operations. Right, Bondi? Who
they just let fly home and no one's
talked about it again?
No one's above the law except anybody Trump
tells you to ignore. Right? Or all those
people the SEC just they may drop. All
those criminals who literally robbed Americans during many
different points. Let them go. They're Trump supporters.
You think that's unique to one side or
not or the other? You're not paying attention.
As Adam says, this you? As Bondi says,
no one's above the law.
Today's indictment reflects yeah. The accusation that's leveled
against Comey that's probably not gonna go anywhere
reflects the department's commitment to hold it. Yeah.
It sure does. The the the absolutely
lack of any kind of gumption you guys
have. Overall,
no one's above the law. It's the dumb
they they both do it. The left does
it all the time, and you should laugh
at it when they do it. The same
thing here. Because, obviously, they both pull punches
where it interests them, and the same point
applies to the Israeli rapists they let go
home.
Also, on the point of free speech that
I find interesting,
never had this problem. Teams behind Epstein Trump
statue
reacts to his removal.
It just it's just so petty and small.
Right? So somebody puts out a a statue
of Trump holding hands to Epstein. And
engraved was the birthday note, whatever.
And Trump had to have it removed.
Of course, he had to lie about it
because legally, it was allowed to be there
because they did. They went through all the
proper channels. What they claimed was that it
was too big. The permit they had wasn't
the right size. Even though if you read
it, they had their contract
was said, if it's gonna be moved or
changed, you have we have twenty four hours.
And they didn't even contact them. They just
cut it down, broke it in half, went
away.
They're because they're petty small people and that
they just they they're willing to abuse their
power in a legal way for something as
dumb as that.
Think about how small that is.
And, yes, they did. They abused their power
to do this. And we're now now what
now how about the whole statue thing? Right?
You got people taking down statues of historical
people, which I equally think is ridiculous. And
you got Trump taking it a whole step
further and taking down somebody's statue they had
a right to post, they legally paid for,
who have free speech right because he didn't
like what it showed. That is the dumbest
version of the whole thing.
Right? You have left taking down historical statues.
At least they have an argument for why
they think it's somehow wrong. I think they're
dumb for doing so because regardless of your
point, it's it's history. You you can't rewrite
history. Well, this is even worse.
Really, despite the right people, you know, the
right team sport will never admit to that
because they'll you know, either way, it's a
this is a free speech matter just like
this is.
Betty Johnson, breaking. The FBI has fired the
agents who were photographed kneeling at a George
Floyd protest.
Why?
Because you don't like their politics? Yeah. Exactly.
And you guys are praising that? You're praising
how small and close minded you are? Like,
this is so crazy to me.
But they're going after the the real stuff.
Right? Epstein files, pshaw. Here are people that
kneeled. You're fired.
Guys, they're just laughable.
I get I get what you think you're
doing. Oh, they kneeled and we're supposed to
be against that, so fire them. That makes
them lefties.
Or maybe they just agreed with the logic.
I'm not I mean, I shouldn't even say
it like that because I'm I'm not saying
that's something you should kneel for. What I'm
saying is they might have agreed with why
that was being done in their minds.
Right? Or maybe they are lefties, and they're
just gonna fire anybody with a certain ideology.
Like, everything about this is illegal. How much
you wanna bet they get sued for this?
You can firing somebody for kneeling? How do
you even know whether they meant that? What
if that guy kneeled next to him just
because he was tired and they did it?
Like, I'm just and and you don't know
is the point. It just kills me how
ridiculous this is. And everybody in the chat,
that's cool. Crazy. Where's the Epstein files?
Exactly. How pathetic. And, of course, Johnson and
the rest are all out there cheerleading for
whatever they said that day. That's what their
job is.
Now let's talk about the UN, Netanyahu, and
the infiltration of this country. As Sean King
says, and you might be not surprised at
all to find out that yet again
yet again, Netanyahu gets up there and talks
about burned alive babies. And as you're right,
zer as the squirrel who's been covering this
from the very beginning, zero babies are burned
as confirmed by Israeli official records.
And for those that don't know that, we've
gone over this 75 times. If I had
to bring up everything to reprove everything we
ever said, sometimes I do, but this show
would end up being eleven hours long every
time. The truth is you can prove this.
If you care to look, it's always there.
Haaretz, even times of Israel was forced to
admit that they had told you this wasn't
real. The beheaded babies, that was embarrassingly broke
down when Biden was in power. And here
we are, where he gets back in front
of the United Nations as a war criminal,
as somebody who was charged and should be
arrested by any associating entity of the ICCICJ,
should be arresting this man.
And instead,
they praise him.
You saw the left and the right. I've
been seeing people make, like, the the a
bunch of UN members walked out when he
was there. Good.
I'll show you what Mike Flynn said about
it. I find it really ridiculous.
But
one person trying to make a point about
how when he was in US, all the
democrats got up and left. Well, guess what,
guys? Or or rather they didn't.
The point was they both did that. And
see, people are just so dishonest in the
partisan field that they have they can't even
be honest about the fact that both of
them they got a he got a standing
ovations from both sides. Honestly, the only people
that deemed to have not were some of
the Democrats.
But in my opinion, most of them are
actually secretly supporting anyway if you watch the
way they vote. It's all just a game
of politics, and most of them are trying
to play that game. But he lied, guys,
again.
And you know what's crazy? Most everyone in
that room knows that.
Sean says, my god. Not one baby was
burned alive in front of their parents on
the front of anyone. He is so used
to nobody knowing the truth that he thinks
these lies still work.
And he says name the babies, name their
parents, show us them before this happens. They
don't exist. And that's that's you know, and
damn them for making us have to do
that. Just like the lie they told about
the rape, which, by the way, nobody brings
up anymore. You know why? Because they got
proven to be lies. The woman with the
gray pants who they used to make an
entire movement came back and said she was
not raped, that it was her ankle that
bled, like we said, that made sense.
And then maybe else someone got raped. We'll
find out. We'll do the evidence. We'll look
at the evidence.
Nothing.
Now, one example has been proven to be
the reality, and that's the one they were
pointing to. And yet, we can prove at
least, at least four people we can prove
were raped by them in prison. The one
that was a famous case, two more on
top of that, and a child that they've
talked about on Amnesty International and other platforms.
And way more than that if you understand
the real topic.
I'll include this just to bring it up.
In case you don't think this is the
reality, here's the leading Israeli human rights group
called B'Tselem who did an entire breakdown called
Welcome to Hell.
Oh, it's weird. It's not loading.
Yeah. It's still loading for some reason. Right
there is where it'll say welcome to hell,
but this is the article where it goes
over the rape that took break place and
said TMN and the different torture camps they
have.
I don't know why it's not loading. There
it goes.
I'll include that for you.
Welcome to hell, what it's called. Literally about
the Israeli prison system by the leading Israeli
human rights group.
Philip Proudfoot says, Israel has murdered more UN
staff in the last two years than in
the entire history of the United Nations.
100% verifiable. And we're not even getting into
the quasi
UN, like, UNRWA overlap. There's some of that.
Yes. But we're talking about, like, World Food
Programme, direct UN p like, UN elements in
cars driving in there. We've gone over this
in Lebanon, in Israel,
occupied Palestine.
They don't even deny this. They just say,
oh, well, Hamas.
They started calling UN Hamas. Don't forget that.
It is beyond disgusting. It was allowed to
address that he was allowed to address
everybody.
The only forum he should be addressing is
the ICC.
And realize, regardless what you think about the
UN, the point he's making is he's in
the United Nations,
speaking to them as they know he's murdered
more people of the entire group than anybody
in history.
The only way you understand that is that
there is still a level of control over
everything.
It's wild.
Like, this is what Flynn had to say.
This person says, almost the entire United Nations
walked out before he was about to speak.
Good.
That that see, that's what you get is
people that are actually willing to say, look,
we're not gonna support this. That's why they
did that in my opinion.
Michael Flynn
says the United Nations despises free speech, probably,
as the body. I'm not gonna dispute that,
unless it's their speech. Okay. But what we're
talking about here is a different dynamic.
The idea that you're required to sit there
and listen to him speak as a genocidal,
as an actual international war criminal,
and you say that's a violation of or
that's
why they despise free speech is just kinda
silly to me. It says you pay for
your words and time to speak and you
support there ism.
Send the United Nations to Brussels. Turn the
buildings into a homeless veterans
home since many of our wars and vets
alright. So
they don't like Israel
and the UN.
Right. Great. Same with Loomer. Suddenly, this is
all you know, the idea is because they
don't support Israel. How about we end it
because it's like an international problem or the
idea that it creates the international kind of
military overlap?
No. No. They don't like Israel, so get
rid of it. I just think that's insane.
Like, the way that they keep doing this
and showing you that this their their gripe,
their issue is with the fact that Israel
is not being supported.
Remember that about Michael Flynn and all the
rest.
He's this is actually pretty crazy to me.
They keep he keeps doing this. A lot
of them do. Where they make, like, for
example, they make the argument, well, you didn't
remove tell the civilians to move in bombing
Iraq. It's like, okay. So then you're what
you're saying is that it's okay to commit
genocide because you did it first? Like, in
what world do you think that makes sense
to anybody? Well, as Mar Mar Maruccio says,
he is literally admitting that Israel is committing
genocide.
Did the Nazis ask the Jews to leave,
kindly leave, go out?
Did others you want me to name all
the genocidal
leaders of history?
Just go one by one. Did anyone do
this? Did they say, get out So we
I mean, what is he trying to say
here? So you cannot have so you don't
have to either?
Like, he literally is putting himself in the
category of other genocidal maniacs.
They didn't name any of them. They didn't
make a move.
I just can't even understand unless he just
is now saying, thanks. Screw you. I mean,
I'm being honest about it. Can come in.
Of course not. All the genocidal
leaders of history,
just go one by one. Did anyone do
this? Did they say, get out
so we can come
in? So the answer is no.
No. They didn't. Right? So the point is
then you don't have to either.
One plus one equals two. He's literally saying,
I'm a genocidal murderer.
I just think I just can't now then,
obviously, I don't think that's what he intended
to mean, but how else do you read
that?
I mean, really, to understand language, that's what
he just did. Now his argument is that
he's not doing that. He's in the same
situation,
and even the genocidal maniac didn't do it,
but think about the way he constructed that.
Wild.
Janet Gurel says, Netanyahu reminding the world that
they are good at murder. I don't know
why they insist on reminding us. It's the
only thing we can all agree on. This
is yes. Yes. You are the world's best
genocidal neanderthals.
Here is what Lord Bibbo posted, and he's
openly praising
one of the most obvious terrorist attacks I've
ever seen in my life.
Those beepers,
the pagers,
we paged because And I'll say this to
you again. I think that's what this is
about. Every time this is floated,
I think that's a threat because that's what
it represents. We can do this to them.
We can do it to anybody, and they've
said that. Politicians who get a little bit
too mouthy, they've said that publicly.
And so with the pager attack in Lebanon,
the reality of their infiltration of tech everywhere,
and the clip of him saying you've got
a little piece of Israel if you've got
a phone in your pocket, they're telling you
that. Now where this goes with what they
just did with Gaza, I think proves that
to you.
Allah.
And you remember those beepers, the pagers?
We paged Hezbollah.
And believe me,
they got the message.
And thousands of terrorists
And I'll show you in a minute. The
people clapping right there are
his little gaggle of people. Nobody else. And
yet Fox News reports it as everybody cheered
when he said that.
Don't forget, they gave people golden pagers.
They, Betar USA,
the terrorist organization that has literally exposed itself
as doing itself. This is the group that
got called out even by the US government,
was giving pagers to people like Norm Finkelstein.
What do you think that means? That's not
a secret, guys. That's what they're doing. They're
using it as a threat. At the UN,
anywhere else. Now the UN part is my
opinion, but I think that's what it is.
Thousands of terrorists.
Oh, let's serve right there. That's them. That's
it.
All just roly lackeys clapping for him. Yay.
Murder and terrorism. Top to the ground.
Here is oh, this oh, I kept right
here, actually.
Fox News. It says,
cheers and erupts. Cheers erupt at the UN
as he talks about the pager attack. Glenn
says there are about eight people clapping in
the video for Netanyahu and they and from
the Israeli delegation, Fox News describes it as
cheers erupt.
You see, I might see this, and this
is CNN, Fox News, partisan media are the
clown show today.
But they all include the show like always.
This is from 09/20/2024.
Israel's infiltration of US tech in light of
the Lebanon pager attack. And it is wild
to look at how
I mean, it's on the surface. Now I'm
not gonna you know, I always want to.
Every time I bring this up, I want
because it's it's maybe someone hasn't seen it.
And I wanna prove it again, but not
not gonna get into that specific some of
the overlapping points. But, you know, all the
stuff we can show you. All the statements
and all the articles and all of this
did what they literally say. And I I
will play that pager clip again because I
think I'm gonna play that every day I
possibly can. But they're they'll tell you. Like,
we build companies to execute the Israeli agenda.
I mean, they're public about it. Whitney's written
about
it.
So understanding that and realizing what they're capable
of, it's it's a very unnerving reality.
So then you recognize recently he said yet
again, do you have cell phones here? And
this was at the fifty states one Israel
conference. 02/1950
is politicians
in Israel while they're committing a genocide.
And he says, you're holding a piece of
Israel if you have a cell phone.
Now, yes, he's making it as you know,
my opinion is that was a threat. So
if you if you're if you're for sake
of conversation assuming that it was, it's about
framing it in a way that's like, well,
we built that in some way, but what
is it even talking about? What point of
a cell phone do you think you created
in Israel? Maybe it's maybe it's something I
don't know.
Overall, if that's the case, it only makes
my point. So now there's something that they
have to ship out and execute that they
can infiltrate and use and
and if for some reason you're going, they
wouldn't do that, are you not paying attention?
Literally, seventy five percent women and children that
were killed or hurt or maimed in Lebanon
because of what they did. They claim it
took ten years before they executed it. So
even if it was the most targeted
delivery in the world,
ten years, those things circulated, got sold, picked
up by children, left in the garbage can,
all the way around. So how long have
they been circulating in The United States
is the question.
Here's TRT World, Netanyahu to all US lawmakers.
Your cell phones and medicines
carry Israel Israel's mark.
So yet again,
I want you to see this. And I'm
I'm gonna again, I'm genuinely here's the thing.
I'm gonna give you a little comment underneath
that I think are hilarious.
Just just understand, even if this video never
came out, what they're telling you as I've
been showing you for years
is documented. They praise it. They love to
throw those people's faces.
They'll lie in front of congress. Your politicians
will lie to you, but they will happily
do this right in front of your face
in in sixty minutes or anywhere else. So
what's funny about this, just before you play
it again, let's not forget, guys. As I
wrote here, remember when Mossad admitted it creates
front companies and conducts psyops all around the
world? We create a pretend world, and we
are a global production company. We write the
screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're
the main actors. The world is our stage.
That's what he said.
Now,
you have to understand, Israel
endure that Israel
talked about this. They pointed to this. They
praised this. They say this in other context.
Right? And so you can argue, you know,
is that a massage? I don't know. Maybe
they lied about that. Or is he saying
this? That's not what happened? Possibly.
Question everything. Right? But all of the data
and all of the evidence we have very
clearly backs up the case that one, Israel
says they did that. Two, that is what
the facts show. Right? And then you could
prove that this is what they've done throughout
history. So the kind of argument that, like,
I can't believe you think that's a real
Assad agent. It's just a very weird take,
and I think it's meant to sort of
undermine the point. So understand whether this video
was ever there to begin with,
they can you can literally prove Israel does
exactly this.
So why they would admit it publicly? Yeah,
I get it. That doesn't seem like that
makes sense unless you are a student of
how they've acted throughout the years. And they
do this quite often. Netanyahu, more than once,
has let it out that he can easily
manipulate The United States. Some of them are
leaked, others have been public
because I think they like to shove it
in your face. But that's my opinion. Why?
I can't tell for sure. But has it
happened? Yes.
So it's willful ignorance to pretend this is
not as that, like, in your face that
clear. How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously,
they didn't know that they were buying it
from Israel. Who did they buy it from?
Or I think they were buying it from.
We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
And let's be real. I bet The US
does the same thing all over the world.
I mean, we can prove that. Right? So
this is not some unique Israel thing. The
point is what they've done and what they're
capable of. They're committing a genocide. They're murdering,
raping, and torturing and praising it all over
the all over the Internet, all over their
own media.
So not hard to see. And then they
just gave you an example of how they're
willing to let these things circulate and execute
it that kills most of the women and
children and maims this as many.
That's the difference, guys. The US is capable
of doing horrible things just as much. It's
easy to look in our history, their history.
But with where we currently are and that
Israel is floundering,
Samson option. Right? Lots of things we can
talk about. That's what makes us even more
relevant.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay,
we're the directors, we're the producers,
we're the main actors, and the world is
our stage.
This is Mossad's old office.
Its motto from Proverbs twenty four six says
in so many words,
wage war through deception and trickery,
kinda like the CIA smoke and mirrors.
Right. It's funny that we pretend that's not
obvious. Right? So their job is to manipulate
you, but we're like, they wouldn't lie to
us or some people. You know? It's just
it's embarrassing. Like like, Dantalek Bennett comes out
and is like, I asked Mossad if if
if, Epstein was an agent. They said no.
So you're lying. It's like, clearly, they're gonna
be honest about that. Right? What a dumb
thing to say. Which is what this operation
was all about,
starting with those walkie talkies.
But walkie talkies are only worn in battle,
so Mossad began developing a new device
that Hezbollah fighters would have in their pockets
all the time. I mean, think about even
that. This is sixty minutes unable to recognize
that's just the most blatant terrorist act you
could talk about, like deliberately making the choice
to make sure that it that it that
it moved out of the field of war.
Right? So you're in a in a situation
where you're dealing with combat fighters. Right? That's
a field of war. And you make a
choice to make sure that what you're doing
will not be in that field of war,
but everywhere.
And they can't make sense. I mean, this
this is what it shows you. The sixty
minutes and all the rest, they're playing their
game too. They're towing that line because you're
not supposed to say it. When the good
guys do it, it's not terrorism. No matter
how blatant it is, no matter how illegal
it is, how embarrassing.
So not real journalists, guys. I don't care
what you say. You can't do something like
that and call yourself a journalist.
So this person says, do you really think
it's actual Mossad agents, Brian?
This person says, I understand your skepticism, but
for sake of conversation or debate, who else
do you think it would be? And what
would their motive be? It's a good question.
One says, actors for rating.
Right. Okay. So without zero with zero due
diligence, your point is CNN or maybe sixty
minutes made it up. Right. But see, if
you care to look beyond just screening your
opinions online, it becomes transparently obvious that it
is going on whether or not that video
took place. And that also, you can easily
make sense of why Israel would need to
bluster and make sense. Like, what's false stuff
forget?
When they said ten years, I don't think
it was actually ten years. So in many
ways, they might be kind of overblowing their
capabilities. The point is that they are creating
fake companies. They are lying in international ways
and making carrying out terrorist acts through these
companies and foreign foreign countries. It's so documented
that it makes my teeth hurt.
But he says, this is sixty minutes for
ref's sake. I'm who's taking sixty minutes at
face value? You, apparently.
No intelligence agency goes on freaking TV and
reveals that okay. So that you can't make
sense of why they did it. It must
be fake. Now, I get the sense this
is somebody with a very obvious ulterior motive.
Like, that's my opinion. Because it's just kind
of this, like, not just lazy logic, it's
like revert, like you're trying to water it
down to a degree that makes it impossible
to make sense of. And I just simply
said, you do realize that the Israeli government
verifiably set up this interview, right? Like they
did that. It's
not hard to prove that. So you first
of all recognize that it's not just sixty
minutes. Israel's the one involved. But did Israel
lie about it? Maybe. But he's not he's
he's on step one. That the whole thing's
fake. It didn't even happen.
Well, Israel set it up, so you're dumb.
Okay. And promoted it publicly, so you're double
dumb.
Could they be lying? Of course, they could.
They lie constantly, but this was in a
statement of the Israeli government, and they stated
this stuff afterward.
And they have said this thing since countless
times. Due diligence is key. But I get
the sense as somebody who's trying to kind
of water down this awareness.
Now this is where it gets especially interesting.
The prime minister came out on the account
on Twitter and said, in an unprecedented action,
prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a live broadcast
from the UN, that's what you saw,
parts of it, has announced that the IDF
took control
of the telephones of Gaza, so like your
iPhone,
and Hamas members.
So, by the way, so average Palestinians who
are not part of Hamas, so we just
ignore. That's a wild violation of the people
they claim they're trying to fight for. Right?
We know that's not what's happening.
And that his speech is now being broadcast
live via the telephones. So they forced their
broadcast onto everybody's phones, regardless of what type,
regardless of what the security was.
Ask yourself that. Ask yourself what else that
I mean, or he could be lying about
this too.
But I think the point is what we
the same kind of idea. We know they
can do this. We've seen this kind of
infiltration.
Jay, Jayhead says, this proves smartphones are modern
Palantiras.
He actually means that in the sense of,
like, the meaning of the what the actual
thing was from Lord of the Rings, like
a two a two way seeing device. And
it says, surveillance weapons in our pockets.
But I also argue Palantir exactly. That's I
agree with that in the sense of the
company too. People must reduce their use or
abandon them useless, abandon them unless safe alternatives
exist.
No authority should ever hijack millions of devices
with strict accountability
and oversight without strict accountability and oversight. I
agree. But, again, I'll I'll use this to
shout this out since it's a it's I'll
always support Catherine Austin fits in what they're
doing.
This is the newer one. I I I
don't know if you might be new you
haven't seen me show it before. I used
to have the one that was a little
pouch that you could open. They started making
these on or put selling them on Solari
Report, and she sent me one. And it's
just a it's a Faraday pouch.
Folds up. I put my phone in this
every second that I'm not using it. Maybe
in the front right here if I wanna
wait for a call, but at the end
of the day, blocked out, which as I've
said many times over the years, drives people
crazy. They usually kind of
assume that I'm, like, ignoring you. You know,
I've got people angry with me because they
act like I'm just being like, no. I
just I just don't I'm not a slave
to my phone. I'll go to my phone
when I wanna use it. And if I'm
expecting something, I'll leave it out. But any
other case, text message, anything else, I'm not
there. I don't leave it on. And so
it's just funny. People get so frustrated about
that, but it's because we're all slaves to
our phones. But beyond that,
now we're talking about something a little more
extreme. Right? We're talking about the possibility that
something might be executed through that. And so
if it is in the Faraday pouch, I
argue that's at least a hell of a
lot less likely to do that. Right? Depending
on, you know, maybe it's not a signal,
maybe something else. But if that was the
case. Either way, that is a smart thing
to do.
Max Blumenthal also points out, as the Jewish
voice reports, the Israeli army is deploying trucks
with loudspeakers
in Gaza to broadcast Netanyahu's speech,
while the unit eighty two hundred will send
it directly to their phones. So you're being
bombarded. This is like psychological manipulation.
Torture,
if you will.
Let me understand. These are starving,
desperate
people. No water, no food in most cases.
People are dying every day, famine.
People aren't even talking about this anymore.
They are literally starving to death. The famine
has been proven
months ago.
So there's they're struggling.
They're bombing them while that's all happening too,
in between being shot and raped and whatever
else is happening to them every single day.
Then they just bombard them with his message
about how they're bad people.
If you don't think that's psychological when that
guys, that is horrifying level stuff.
Israel is forcing Palestinians to listen to the
speech. The photo shows Israeli army trucks with
loudspeakers broadcasting his speech to displaced Gazan residents.
Why where did the Israeli army get this
idea? From Nazi Germany army,
which
which spread Hitler's propaganda in concentration camps. Hitler
is the excuse me. Netanyahu is the Hitler
of our time, Max writes. Zionism
excuse me. This is the Jewish voice, which
I find even more interesting,
which, of course, they'll probably call racist or,
you know, not really, you know, self hating,
whatever the dumb terms they use. No. It's
just somebody likely Jewish who recognizes the problem
of Zionism that isn't about Judaism.
So Netanyahu is the Hitler of our time.
Zionism is today's Nazism, they write. Israel is
today's Nazi state. Netanyahu does not represent the
Jewish people. Zionism is not Judaism and can
never be. Israel is not a Jewish state.
As Max writes and they they even have
the images of the old ones. It's pretty
hard to ignore.
Max simply says Netanyahu deployed military loudspeakers to
blast his United Nations tirade into Gaza concentration
camps, demonstrating a new level of psychosis,
a cartoonish, but characteristically Zionist blend of sadism
and narcissism on bold display. Well put.
Glenn also points out, and I think this
is what really opens this, you know, for
you to think about. Here's the actual tweet
from Netanyahu.
Glenn says, Israel has such complete surveillance and
control of Gaza's communication networks, only way you
can make that happen,
that it can commandeer them to force them
their phones to broadcast his speech, but
somehow Israel had no clue that Hamas was
planning an operation as large as October 7
and then took hours to respond.
We have to realize that that's about as
dumb as the nine eleven story or the
COVID story or whatever these big bombastic or
the Warren report. This is a really obvious
and honestly, I shouldn't even include that in
the category of something like that
or in the context of nineeleven, for example.
But the point, because this is if you
understand the reality of this, not even starting
with the idea that this is something that
clearly was allowed to happen, the timing, everything,
even from Israelis, but the reality that most
of the people that were killed were killed
by Israel. All of this has come out.
This is not hyperbolic anymore.
Either way,
Zionists screaming about the truth coming out. The
point is that it shows you that if
they have such overwhelming control over this stuff,
how do you possibly make sense that they
just didn't see it coming?
You know that's not the truth, guys. And,
hey, here's Charlie Kirk telling you about that.
Zero many times. The whole country is a
fortress. When I first heard this story, I
still had the same
gut instinct
that I did initially. I find this very
hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza
border. You you cannot go 10 feet without
running into a 19 year old with an
AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that
is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country
is surveilled. And so so let me let
me just kinda go through this. We don't
talk about Israeli politics very often, and most
Americans don't know this. The last nine months,
Israel was on the brink of civil war.
It's not an exaggeration.
They it's been a long time, by the
way.
It it really I remember I was talking
about this too, and they hate Netanyahu.
Like, he he is the villain in their
own and and but every time, And their
own politic, their own media will tell you
this. It gets close to him maybe going
to jail or going to his indictment. Like,
even recently,
there was a moment he was about to
go have to go to, like, trial and
and or, was it trial or was it
a hearing? Either way, like I said, thing,
really. He was supposed to go and and
kind of address these things. And there was
an issue, and he had to postpone it.
And it's all about Gaza and the war.
He's been doing that for years,
maintaining power as an illegitimate leader. And, guys,
it's, you know, it's funny how these are
imagine a fraction of any of this stuff
happening in any other country The US doesn't
like. This judicial stuff, there were there were
hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the
streets because Bibi Netanyahu is basically redefining
the Israeli constitution. That's not Ah, yes. Remember
how many times we talked about that? And
and people like Lindsey Graham comes out and
goes, the ICC has no standing because they
have an independent judiciary. Ah, yes. But they
don't. And that's exactly what he's talking about.
And judges from Canada and all around the
world said, if he does what he just
listed right what he was talking about right
there, which he did already, it was a
while ago, then they will no longer have
independent yes. And here we are. They just
they they've taken complete control because it is
a desk it's a dictatorship, guys, just like
we're seeing develop in this country.
So the reality is they don't. And so
that was exactly why the ICC has jurisdiction
to go after. But the Lindsey Grahams of
the world, the Trump's and Biden of the
world will never allow it to happen. Why
do you think that is? Not an exaggeration.
Right? He said the judicial branch has too
much power. There were protests planned this week
again It has too much power. Doesn't that
sound familiar?
Ask Bucoleg in El Salvador. It's exactly what
he did. He basically
suspended civil liberties and overthrew the people in
the courts. That's what Trump's about to do.
When what do you hear from Stephen Miller?
Judicial coup. Too much power in the courts.
No. All it really is the courts checking
their power, and they don't like that. It's
Netanyahu,
where they anticipated tens of thousands of people
to take to the streets.
That's all gone, Patrick.
Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a
mandate to lead. I'm not Oh, doesn't that
sound familiar?
See, you're gonna find a lot more over
alarming
overlaps
between Trump and and and Netanyahu, that it's
it's mind blowing.
They're the same thing.
And I think that's and that could speak
to the fact that Israel is the one
making all this happen or some of the
fact that they both have the same mindset
and goals, which is not about freedom and
democracy or whatever you think we should be
fighting for. It is about absolute control
at all costs.
I'm not willing to say to go so
far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there
was intelligence here, but I think some questions
need to be asked. Was there a stand
down order?
See see, dear Patrick McDavid, he
you're not allowed to say this, let alone
as somebody who's representing one of the most
important audiences
for Israel.
But we know how this story ended. There
is stand down order.
Six hours. I don't believe it. Israel's the
side of new sides of New Jersey. When
I took a helicopter ride What's funny is
look at Patrick Beck, David's guest. He is
such a gross pro Zionist. It is funny.
You can just every time somebody goes this
direction, he's, like, he's already writing notes. I'm
gonna push back his little, you know, clumsy,
misspelled notes. But what's funny is just that,
obviously,
it's a very important and very obvious question.
And all these things were right leading up
to the last month before he
died.
From Jerusalem
to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes.
Wow. Six hours. They're live streaming the killing
of Jews.
Was did somebody in the government say stand
down? That is a legitimate
non Yeah. Conspiracy question. And yet you're still
not allowed to ask that. People don't let
that conversation be had right now. Israel will
call you
a blood libel Jew hater.
The whole country is the IDF.
The whole con yes. Literally. Because they all
have to join the IDF, save for very
few exceptions.
Guys, think I mean, it's just so crazy
how clear that is. People like Efraim Faganston,
who was part of the intelligence apparatus before
she, served her time and went out, will
tell you, it's not possible. She was the
first one screaming about that.
There's no way that this, I mean, or
the people that were, we've gone over all
of this here, I'll even include this for
you.
The show we did specifically on that. And
this by the way, this is before we
there's tons more information that we followed up
on the months and months after this. But
this was on 06/18/2024.
The undeniable reality of October 7 foreknowledge and
the Hannibal directive. And I'm glad this image
is one before that they've tried to scrub,
by the way, before they were able to
shuffle all those cars off to the side.
Because it shows you they bombed them as
they were fleeing while they knew they were
hostages in the cars. All of this has
come out.
It's just over the top.
So, again,
with all the people, all the knowledge, the
women that were in those towers that literally
said, we see them training, we see it
coming, and they were threatened with jail time
if they kept bringing bringing it up. I
mean, you you just it's you can't it
takes stupidity
to not be able to acknowledge how clear
this is.
Now
I wanna play a video that is an
interesting overlap to some of this stuff. Now
this is Andrew Torba
commenting on this, and he says, study the
video carefully. He is very openly broadcasting all
of their next moves. This is Netanyahu.
One, TikTok belongs to them now. Expect expect
mass censorship, algo rigging there. Your favorite influencer
is already owned by them, except to them,
start they start shilling hard except expect them,
excuse me, to start shilling hard for them.
They will attempt to buy more influencers. Many
will take the deal. Those who don't will
be made an example of. Number three, they
are coming for Twitter and Elon next, which,
by the way, I it's come on. Really?
I think that's well since already happened. But
it says they claim he's a friend and
what will live next. Okay. So before we
play the video, which everyone is sharing,
interestingly, this is actually where the video started.
The video is a one of the social
media influencers invited to ask softball questions to
Netanyahu.
Now, weirdly, it was a very softball question
but touched on something I think he didn't
wanna get into, which was Charlie Kirk. But
here's the first part of it, and then
we'll play the video that has been circulating.
Here's the question.
Something I would like to raise, which was
actually my first published paper, was how you
and the Likud party are cut from the
same ideological cloth as Trump and the GOP
in America.
Think about what she just said. That's like
a path that's her opening or statement. Like,
that's a like, we all agree. That's all
common knowledge. Right? That's how she's starting it.
The the Likud party, one of the most
radical elements, like, say, for kind of Smotrich
Ben Gavir side of it,
that they're cut from the same ideological
cloth
as Trump and the Republicans.
So what, they're Jewish? I mean, what how
would you even possibly make sense of that?
The same ideological cloth can't mean anything other
than, you know, the
the religion and political views.
So maybe she just meant
right wing or whatever you think that meant.
But it's a very weird thing to say
because from Netanyahu's perspective, they're one and the
same. Right?
That's what they tell you.
But yet when you say that, you're racist
somehow. But think about what she just said.
And I think the point is it is
the case, and it shows you that the
that's why you got Miller. And, I mean,
you could list off the 17
drooling Zionists that are just right in front
of his cabinet. All of them out there
actively, aggressively fighting for things for Israel at
the expense of The United States. Or you
can watch each each one of them make
their their statements, dissent, and and and Waltz
and all of them. You know, getting caught
using a Israeli intelligence app to relay information
from the from the cabinet or standing up
and gushing about why Israel's your wife of
The United States and we have to fight
for them. Every one of them have shown
you step by step, Hegset, Bondi, all of
them, that they will pull punches for Israel.
And then you can even talk about Cash
and Bongino and the is Epstein and everything
else. It is undeniable. Now that point aside.
And so specifically with Charlie Kirk's assassination, who
was a big mentor of mine, who's my
first mentor in the space,
Evangelicals
from all my research, evangelicals are the reason
that Israel has been supported in public sphere
outside of just Jews. So with And that's
because they've convinced everybody that that's their, like,
religious duty to support what they claim is
Israel from the bible. Why? Because a bunch
of
racist scientists decided to use that name to
trick people in this country or rather trick
Christians in the world, which is really easy
to prove, guys. I mean, they just chose
the word Israel because of its biblical meaning
when the Balfour declaration from The UK and
the and Rothschild literally handed them the land
illegally
while Palestinians lived there.
But, yeah, god gave it to us, I
guess. Like, it's just it's it's pretty stupid
if you just understand the history, but they
hope that you just don't look.
Charlie's assassination with the kind of trajectory that
we see with, like, Candace Owens and Tucker
Carlson. I guess I'm curious about what's another
game plan if we lose evangelical support for
the state of Israel. What's our backup plan
to be strong,
like, outside of the diaspora?
Thank you.
So that was the question, and I just
find that interesting. So with the case of
people like Tucker and Candace, what, revealing in
some cases the reality of what's going on
and how dare they? What's your what's your
agenda? Like, there's a weird way to so
it just shows you. There's like a there
are united front. American social media people that
they pay, and then a foreign government committing
a genocide. How are we gonna show a
unified front? See, the only thing they make
they think is their connected threat is that
they're all fighting for Judaism. That's not even
close to what's happening. She may think that.
Some of them know that's not what's happening
and still do it anyway. Fight like Laura
Loomer, I argue.
But I just think it's just a level
of, like, this is my the reason why
I argue so many, if not the majority
of people in the mainstream, alternative media, and
just independent in general
are unaware that they're being used. And that's,
like, the most effective way to manipulate people
because they don't even know they're being used.
They think they're doing a good job. They
think they're doing look. I'm gay I'm gaining
and people are supporting me. I'm making all
this money. I must be doing the right
thing.
It's it's like it's it's really the new
addition of manufacturing consent. Right? You go back
to Noam Chomsky's point about the way the
media operated and newscasters. Right? Well, the point
was
they most of them didn't even realize that
they were doing that. They were in that
position because they already held certain preconceived beliefs
and that's why they chose them. So they
thought they were doing the no. They were
cultivated. And at some points, you you kinda
brush up against the control. And in most
cases, you're making lots of money and you
just ignore it. PPR principles, you do you
do something about it like Alison Morrow. Right?
The point though is that I think that
is the new social media version. And so
these new TikTok broadcasters, like, they don't even
know or they don't care. Or they do.
Right? And to my point though is that
I think the majority are people that
pretend it's not there if or they maybe
don't even notice it or aren't in incapable
of noticing it. So here is his response
to what we're gonna do
about people like Tucker and, you know, and
the and the awareness around Israel.
Question,
influencers.
Okay.
You said,
you talked about the woke right, and you
said, I call it the woke right.
That's a brilliant That's brilliant.
The woke right, because these people, you know,
they're not any different from the woke
left. I mean We see this is such
a ridiculous inversion. Now we'll talk about this
in a second because even within the independent
media, there's, like, these multi definitions of this.
It's really simple, guys. If you're not a
partisan, it's pretty easy to see. Right? Which
is that it's not about politics at all.
It's about cancel culture.
It's about
using
hate speech and words. Right? It's about controlling
things using
cancel culture. Right? I mean, that's what this
is. So to call
what he's saying is the woke right.
Reich meaning Nazis. Right? Okay. So now you're
telling me the people that don't like Israel
are the woke right?
I mean, how does that even make sense?
How or so how would so is are
the people that are against Israel the ones
censoring people for antisemitism?
No. Okay. Then are they so the ones
that are against Israel on the right, are
they part of the left? No. So you
can't call them woke right left, right? So
the only point you're making is somehow to
frame the people who are calling Israel out,
who are not censoring using hate speech,
woke
right. Because what you're doing is trying to
conflate the ideas. The real woke right are
the ones out there censoring for Israel. And
it's not because they're right or left or
because they're it's because of the practices, because
they are willing to censor people around speech,
because there's cancel culture, because it's ideological manipulation
division. That's what they're doing. It's the same
thing on either side. And what's weird is
that even people in the independent media can't
seem to, like, identify that. And I'll show
you in a second. But what he's doing
is trying to conflate
the the people who are calling them out
with the ones who are censoring you for
hate speech because it confuses the partisans.
Oops. Wrong video. They're insane. They're in the
weeds.
But they're actually meeting on some of the
things. And what we have to do is
we have to secure that part.
So they're actually meeting. So what he's talking
about is people calling out Israel. That's what
he's calling it. So if there's the people
on the left and the right, people that
all recognize it was coming a genocide, now
suddenly they're all the woke maniacs.
Really funny to me. Right? Except that's almost
exactly the opposite when you look at the
real picture. Of our the base of our
support in The United States, that is being
challenged systematically.
A lot of this is done with money.
Money of NGOs.
Oh, isn't that exactly what Trump is pointing
to right now? See, I want you to
really think about this. When we get to
the point about what's going on or maybe
is in Portland,
that's what's driving it, guys. That person right
there. That's what I believe. I think the
reality is this is about shutting down awareness
conversation, more than just their genocide, just the
control of where they're going and what they're
building.
So he needs you to think, which by
the way is some level to the truth.
They all do that. They do that. They
fund all sorts of counter protests. What they're
trying to create is the motivation
or that rather the construct for you to
think that anybody they point to is part
of that so they can go after them.
Trump is laying out the narrative just like
he's saying right there. You think that's a
coincidence?
Fast
money of governments,
bastard.
Okay? We have to fight back.
How do we fight back? Our influencers?
I think you should also talk to them
if you have a chance. Right. Propaganda. To
that that community. They're very important.
And secondly,
we're gonna have to use the tools of
battle.
You know, the the weapons change over time.
You can't fight today with swords. That doesn't
work very well. Okay?
And you can't fight with the fight with
cavalry. That doesn't work very well. And you
have these new things, you know, like drones,
things like that. I won't get into that.
But we have to fight with the weapons
that,
apply to the battlefields within which we're engaged.
And the most important ones are in social
media.
And the most important purchase that is going
on right now is
class followers. Followers.
I know. Parts?
Class.
God, what a bunch of patron like, these
are all supposed to be big time social
media influencers, and they're just blindly pandering along.
I mean, they're he's treating them like they're
children. He's patronizing you. You're it's just embarrassing.
I guess that's the rite of passage for
all these blind followers. Right? But social TikTok
is what he's talking about. Social media. He's
literally
signaling. He's outlining to you that he's controlling
your information.
TikTok. Number one. Number one. Right. Because it
because as Greenblatt told you, it's a it's
an a it's a
it's a generation problem. It's not left and
right. Exactly like we're trying to show you.
It's people who are suddenly becoming aware of
the reality of Israel's origins.
And you can't you can, like it's it's
really largely because of what they did post
October 7. You can't put that genie back
in the bottle. So what what are they
gonna do? They're gonna fund. They're gonna influence.
They're gonna threaten. They're gonna do whatever they
can to shut you up.
And Trump is doing what he's told. It
goes through because it's,
it can be consequential.
Mhmm. And the other one, what's the other
one that's most important?
X. X.
X. X. That's Successful. Very good. Wow.
And
Very good, guys. Thank you for doing exactly
what I'm telling you to do. How embarrassing.
It's like there's a list of who's there.
You can find it online. They should I
mean, that's embarrassing, guys. I mean, look. At
the end of the day, you're not there
to
you know, like, this is not going there
to ask questions of a leader and ask
them journalistic questions. You're going there to pander.
You're going there to be told and patted
on the head, which is what they're doing.
Listen to the questions that they asked. It's
all a bunch of, like, you're the best
thing ever. How can we help you? Stuff
like that. You know? So we have to
talk to Elon. He's not an enemy.
He's a friend. We should talk to him.
Talk to him about what? How you've already
censored Grok 15 times to make him to
make it tell you the right answers? And
even then, it recently told you that two
leg were you know, Israel's committing genocide, and
they had Elon comes out and goes, yeah.
Sorry. I got to fix that. What?
Like, the fourth time they publicly told you
the answers they give they don't like, therefore,
we're gonna edit it again. Oh, but by
the way, Grok is now becoming the the
chat a like, the AI government we told
you about. I'll point that again in a
second. It's very clear. It is literally becoming
immersed with the government now, like we told
you it always would. It always actually was,
to be quite honest, but now it's publicly
happening.
That's a real point I want you not
to miss.
This, I honestly think, is him trying to
state something like this to make it appear
as if there's not that. We don't have
a connection. Like, we all know they do,
guys. It's undeniable. Whether it was Authentix or
whether it was CHEQ, which by the way
is well be or even just Elon Musk
and his immediate connection or the fact that
they as they work right now with the
ADL, like Yaccarino and the rest, they've censored
most of the things they've even going back
to Garm. 93% of the time, they complied
with what their government the what they were
told to censor.
All of this is on the record, but
they work with the ADL. Yaccarino told you
this, that we will comply with what they
ask. This is not hard to see. So
what is he asking for then if they're
already complying?
So what do you think that means? I
think it means that he's trying to state
as if there's not that because they see
what's happening. I think XAI is the obvious
infiltration backdoor in this government right now. My
opinion, other than the obvious things that's already
proven to you, but whether it's Israel is
my opinion.
So I think that's why you're laying that
groundwork. Completely my opinion.
Because my you have to understand, the provable
reality is that what he just said there
is not true. Not only are there agreements
and overlap and contracts with all sorts of
overlapping Israeli points and different companies and like
we just told you.
So what exactly is what else would happen?
What do you mean get them on board?
With what?
More censorship? They're already doing that. You get
what I'm saying? I think it's very important
to think about.
Now if we can get those two things,
we get a lot, and I could go
on on other things, but that's not the
point right now. We have to fight the
fight.
Okay? So it seems like he just inserted
the x point for a very obvious reason
to me. To take
give direction to the Jewish people and give
direction to our non Jewish friends
or those who could be our Jewish, our
friends. Are we gonna succeed with everyone? No.
He shouldn't even, like, act he can't even,
like, act he he accidentally makes it clear
that oh, it's just god. They're so transparent.
So
oh, here was the the post here, and
here is what Caitlin Johnstone said. Everyone's talking
about Netanyahu's comments about TikTok here, but I
haven't seen much mention of his remark about
Elon Musk. And he's a friend whose friendship
can be used to advance Israeli information interest
on this platform,
which is exactly what he said. I'm not,
like, literally
paraphrasing, but that was the exact meaning of
what he was laying out. That's what they're
all doing. Help us get our information out,
guys. He's basically telling you how they can
infiltrate this platform,
and I think it's already happened. Now quickly
to the
the woke right point, this is what I
was saying. This person says he uses the
very particular phrase woke right before explaining how
so important social media is to his country's
influence operations in The United States. If this
was Putin, we'd be preparing rounds of sanctions.
He's absolutely right.
Right? I mean, quite literally telling you how
can we manipulate the information on these platforms.
Of course, you can argue he means get
the truth out, but no. It's the same
difference. You're saying how can we get what
we want out there? If it was Putin,
everybody
because we're all
I'd rather just put it this way. In
this partisan game, everybody has their buzzwords.
You know? That's the one I'm supposed to
hate. That's the one I'm supposed to like.
So right now, that's what we all if
rather from the government's perspective, that would be
the big boogeyman. If they did it, it
doesn't matter. It's everywhere you look. But Dave
Smith says the term woke right has always
been nothing more than a smear against right
wingers who don't support forever wars in Israel.
So I can get that from that perspective.
Like, what he's saying is that they're.
And so it is a smear on people
that don't support Israel. So I get I
agree with that.
But I understand that it's not about that's
the way Netanyahu is using it. So the
true meaning
of this based on what the term even
meant, well, even even if only applied to
the left, is about cancel culture. Right? It's
about it's about the culture,
identity politics and censorship, hate speech, stuff like
that.
That's the only real consistent line, right? So
that's the only way I've ever used it.
And so that's why I think the truth
is.
But he's right to say that's how you
know, he's using it. But what I find
interesting is that it seems to be lost
even amongst them in the conversation. He says,
this is why when asked to define the
term as defenders sound like
stupid children.
Ian Carroll says, and ironically, making up new
identity groups to divide people is a key
element of woke ideology. Exactly.
Exactly. And that's exactly what the right is
doing. That's what the real point is. So
when at least I am pointing out the
woke right, I'm talking about people who are
acting in the same way regardless of the
partisan side, the
woke side of it, broflakes, snowflake, right? The
people that are willing to clutch their pearls
about the mean things you say to censor
you in the times that they need that
to happen. Happen. It's exactly the same thing,
and you know it if you're paying attention.
Now, here are some important overlaps.
Israeli politician Yair Golan openly declares that the
next step is imposing strict controls on social
media, blocking anything authorities label as propaganda.
Now you understand, this is not about just
Israel, guys. This is where this is going
and all these moves. Trump and the I
mean, you have to understand that all of
what we can see like, let me put
it this way. I guarantee you that Portland
and and smaller actions in just this country,
that every one of them probably have their
own agendas.
Probably, Bondi and the rest have their own
personal things they think they can accomplish, Hegseth
or Donald Trump himself. But on top of
that, there is an overarching agenda. There always
really is. I think that what you must
understand that these things, whether they even realize
it or not, are all movements in a
larger game.
And so what we're talking about right now
is the infiltration to these platforms, the control.
Like, if you you could even literally just
make sense of the whole picture, and I
do think it's much more complicated than this.
But if you wanted to, you could make
this just about Israel and its floundering narrative
control. And right now, they're so desperate to
not lose control of the narrative because well,
they already have, but maybe in their minds
gain it back because they're about to lose
in more ways than just the war.
So you could make sense of that's why
literally everything is happening. Again, I'm not saying
that's what I think. I think it's much
more complicated, but that's logical. You could look
at the moves they're making. You could look
at the move The US is taking, and
you recognize it all leads in that very
same direction
everywhere you look. Even in regard to the
the rolling out of the police, the social
the the military deployment. We We just went
over these points. It aligns exactly with what
they're trying to accomplish.
You'll see this more as we go through.
What's here is what a Israeli politician is
saying, and then you can very clearly see
that's exactly the way they're responding.
Thing
I will do,
we will
do, is to put restriction
on the social media
in a way
that not allow to make brutal propaganda
in the social media
because this is a worldwide
problem.
Right. It's a worldwide problem that people can
see what you're doing.
And it should be initiate
by The United States Of America,
the place where all the big
firms
is settled.
Facebook
and
x It's just funny how they're all seem
to be responding based on that small little
insignificant country's question.
And all the rest. Obviously, it makes a
point. Major problem for democracy
all over the globe.
Yeah. Right. We need to treat it seriously.
Right. Right. So it's a problem
for democracy, which we pretend means free speech
and and rights. Right? But those are the
things we don't like. So get rid of
them, but freedom and democracy. Right?
You you can go ahead and kick people
in the teeth and break their door down
and say democracy doesn't make it democracy. Okay?
And then understand that even that is my
rule and not what we really are in
this country or foundationally we're anyway, but rather
republic.
Either way, they're using the buzzwords and claiming
we have to fight for good things. And
by saying that
to save those good things, we have to
make sure you can't say and think what
you want.
Because we're the good guys, and that's okay.
Right? But if it was Russia, Iran, it
would be evil and bad, but we're good,
so it's okay.
So
here is something you've seen before.
Funny how you can see the obvious extension
of this agenda coming from Larry Ellison, one
of the most blind supporters of Israel in
the conversation. Also somebody who seems to own
half of the media we consume in this
country,
if not more.
And as Blakely says, so we're just gonna
keep ignoring this?
Michael Shellenberger says, the man behind digital ID
push is Larry Ellison. One of them, by
the way, owner of Oracle,
key player in Stargate with Donald Trump,
c owner of CBS, CNN, and soon TikTok.
He wants data centralization and total surveillance. Don't
forget, even before he took over, they were
censoring conversation of his deal. They were censoring
shockingly more around Israel, instantaneously.
It was very public.
He says, quote, citizens will be on their
best behavior because we're constantly watching.
This is what Republicans support.
I guess many of them don't even know
they're supporting it. Your body cams will be
transmitting that.
The police will be on their best behavior
because we record we're we're constantly recording watching
and recording everything that's going on.
Citizens will be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on. When you come to government and
what government's doing, they're obviously
there are artificial intelligence tools and some of
them I know that Oracle have developed around
financial management for government. But, also,
tell us a bit about what because you're
right at the forefront of this revolution, what
it means for what government should do in
terms of its digital infrastructure,
you know,
digital ID data centers and so on.
How do you take advantage of these incredible
AI models?
And
the first thing a country needs to do
is to unify all of their data
so it can be consumed and used by
the AI model. You have to take all
of your health care data, your diagnostic data.
Yeah, guys. And that's what already happened in
our country.
Like, don't miss that obvious point. So is
Larry Ellison driving our conversation? Is it Israel?
Is it you know, the point is regardless,
the larger agenda that's being rolled out in
Israel, around the world, and other places, and
their their weird little despotic
fake libertarian hellscapes they're creating and freedom cities
coming to into town near you. That's what
they're talking about. Who cares about privacy?
Right? And and,
what's it what is it called again?
After blanking on the terms. But, you know,
the idea is simply being
that we have a right to have that
privacy. And that's why we had silent information
with different locations. And it wasn't just freely
shared with anybody who wanted it. Except today,
they said, screw that.
Golden age, freedom, but we're gonna, you know,
lie about all of that. Like, just giving
you buzzwords and then taking it all away.
The bottom line is they they removed the
silos, and as that everything got bunched together
for the AI to train, it's exactly what
he's talking about, and then gave access to
Israel, all on the record, as well as
other companies like Palantir.
But then don't worry though, RFK promised that
they'd have to show you what they have
on you.
That's not a joke, by the way. That's
what we have freedom, and we're gonna make
sure that they have to show you, like,
we never know for sure that they were
being truthful. It's it's just such a placation.
It kills me.
Your electronic health records, your genomic data. And,
you know, in The Middle East, in The
UAE, for example, they they are incredibly
rich in data.
I mean, why why is it that so
he's arguing that they, as a company, as
as a government,
have to have access to your genomic data,
all your information. That's not that's my choice.
But see, people like Ellison don't even consider
that you have a choice in this process.
They have a lot of populate
population data. The NHS in The UK has
an incredible amount of population data,
but it's fragmented.
It's not easily accessible by these AI models.
We have to take all of this data
we have in our country
and move it into a single, if you
will, unified
data platform
so that so we provide context. When we
wanna ask a question,
We've provided that AI model with all the
data they need to understand our country. So
that's the that's the big step. That's kind
of the missing link. We need to unify
all of the national day.
And you see that not only is that
what they already did. Right? So Donald Trump
apparently made that decision without your nobody was
asked.
Our privacy wasn't even considered, but he cares
about you. Right? America first. No. No. They
let other companies and foreign powers access all
of your data because
apparently, Ellison told them that was okay or
told them what was necessary to train the
models. Like, that that's that's everything that's been
happening. And I think that's why Trump's the
one doing it because the people who would
push back more than anybody are being pacified
by the fact that it's him.
That's a violation of your privacy. But who
cares? Because golden age or whatever they tell
themselves.
So that so we provide context. When we
wanna ask a question,
we've provided that AI model with all the
data they need to understand our country.
And that's what they've just done.
Right? They've scooped it all together and allowed
to train these models.
So that's the that's the big step. That's
kind of the missing link. We need to
unify all of the national data,
put it into a database
where it's easily consumable by the AI model,
and then ask whatever question you like. So
you're really through the use of this, you're
revolutionizing
the way government works. Right? The services it
provides, the way that it operates.
What a what a insulting way to frame
that. What you're saying is they no longer
care about you.
Right? Where you're changing the whole dynamic by
the government can just take what it wants
and told you you know, it's guys, this
is what's funny,
the whole collectivist mindset.
This is the you owe nothing and you've
been you've you've never you've never been happier.
I just don't know why Republicans can't see
that. What about things like
financial management, procurement? How how can a AI
help a government operate more efficiently, more effectively,
you know, give a more direct and better
service to the citizen?
Well,
you know, modern we we have these modern
financial systems.
In case you can't see it, by the
way, or for the podcast, this is the
World Government Summit.
The World Government Summit twenty twenty five.
Like, this is a guy who's immersed in
the US government right now. So too is
Israel, Palantir, and all the other people that
are, like, key central roles in this conversation.
But Trump's fighting the deep state. Right, Jones?
And he's fighting Davos even though he went
and spoke. But he said pronouns were bad,
so we're winning.
Don't let these morons convince you that we're
not obviously seeing everything that's happening, guys. Because
there's some wink, wink, secret narrative that they
think the handshake meant.
Look. It's right in front of you what's
happening. These people are building out something right
around you.
Pay attention.
So, you know, countries can
and all let's say, for example, the AI
system will help you help you do that.
But again, the secret is to get all
and get all of that data in one
place
without having the basic data. It doesn't have
the it cannot answer the question about your
country. Right. And so this is the point
that it's important to make, guys.
Remember when I keep telling you, like, there
was the gold standard of data? Nope. Like,
overlap intended. Like, that that was the important
part. That's why all these people go like,
are you telling me they couldn't just take
your data off online?
You know, that's an uneducated over of view
of something they clearly don't understand.
The information that you can get from this
is what we said in the beginning, from
what they had on you was not what
you typed online, what you shopped that day,
or what you it's about
real time and long term
information about choices that were made, what you
said and thought, and then what actually happened.
Right? Or what happened and what the outcome
was and what the follow-up was. Like, that
it is what's considered the gold standard of
data, which they didn't actually have,
and now they do. But that's the important
part. That was what was allowed. It was
a major step, and that's why he was
telling you it was the most important thing.
Trump just let it happen.
No concern for your privacy. No concern for
your rights.
Call it out. I mean, it's incredible, guys,
but that that is the same. If it
was Biden or Trump or Obama or Bush,
I'd call it out the same way because
it's insulting.
He violated you.
That's why people are starting to call it
out.
I I think,
countries are very uncomfortable,
with keeping their data in other countries' data
centers.
So I I think,
part of our essential infrastructure, just like airports
obviously need to be in our country or
they're they're they're not terribly useful. Ports need
to be on our country and not terribly
useful.
Data centers, because of of the privacy
requirements around the data, need to be in
our countries or they're not terribly useful. They
need to be in our countries, but they
also need to be secure.
And we there are new technologies
right now. This is the last year you
will ever log on to an Oracle system
with a password.
Next you know, by the middle of this
year,
you
well, how do I I mean, I'm quite
certain you are Tony Blair.
And
so how do I know? Well, I look
at you. I hear your voice. I listen
to the kind of questions you ask. I'm
pretty sure you're not, you know, you're not
synthetically created,
in having this conversation.
Our the security system, we we have biometric
log logins
that the computer recognizes you. It recognizes your
voice. It might ask you See, guys. This
is just creepy dystopian stuff. Like, even if
you think it's gonna benefit everybody, even if
he has the best of intentions, all he's
saying is, in the future, you won't need
to verify. We'll already know. We'll already have
everything. So it's all happy and safe. Right?
Yeah. Unless they have bad intentions, unless everything
that's ever happened in history ends up happening
eventually, which is despotism every single time in
every government situation you could ever possibly find,
but not this time because Ellison's a good
guy, because Trump believes in God. So we'll
just pretend we don't obviously know what will
always happen. Guys, with Jefferson, right, it's like
we've talked about all the time recently. It's
a republic if you can keep it.
The idea is that it always the founding
fathers knew it always without fail, false despotism.
It's on us to keep it that way
or keep it from happening.
Not to hope the government always has the
best intentions and put your head down because
my side's winning.
You put your index finger on the return
key. And we know we're absolutely certain it's
you. There's no reason to enter a password.
In fact, passwords are too easily stolen.
The,
But see, the point is in the world
they're building,
I don't have a choice to say I
don't want that. What's gonna happen is either
for well, in in the way it always
goes. We'll probably start with some kind of
a level of choice unless they just ram
this in like they've been doing. And it
will be that you won't benefit. Right? This
is the world they're building and you won't
have access to everything, including eventually, probably very
quickly things that you need, you know, like
buying gas or going to the grocery store
or whatever else.
But then eventually, it becomes that if you
don't, you have you're, you know well, then
it's kicked to the back of the line.
Then as always, it gets, you know, you're
get going to jail or you get kicked
out of society.
I mean, it may seem hyperbolic to you
guys. It's the same we saw it in
a rapid case in COVID nineteen. It's the
same thing. They're gonna claim us to the
best of society, whether it's a pandemic or
or climate change or or domestic terrorism or
immigration. The same answer is this. As we've
always told you,
look for yourself. That's this is let's say,
weird how the solution is always this.
Data centers and data is being taken hostage
all over the world.
The ransomware
business is a very, very good business. It's
getting bigger and better every year. We tend
not to talk about it because the American
FBI has a simple advice to someone whose
data has been ransomed.
Just pay them because there's nothing we can
do about it.
But there is something we can do about
it. Not after the data is stolen,
but before the data is stolen, we can
make sure that we we're using the latest
security technology,
and it is gonna be biometrics
assisted by AI to make sure that you
are in fact, Tommy Blair. And I I
mean, is that what you want, MAGA? Is
that what you thought? I mean, isn't that
what we all pushed back on during the
great reset conversation?
But I guess it's just okay
because, I guess, because Trump extended through him,
Larry Ellison's now the good guy. Like, aren't
these the very deep state, meta,
the Oracle, all of these people? Aren't they
the ones where yeah. But now it's okay
because now they're on our theirs. I mean,
how do you even make sense of how
stupid this is? This is the same thing
you got from all the Joneses and all
the people out there who have been claiming
they're fighting all of this, who suddenly just
pretend like it's not obvious at the inauguration.
Pretend it's not obvious at the million dollar
royal dinner where the literal
elitist
influencer controllers are all sitting there. The very
same people that thirty seconds ago, he told
you were all deep state because they were
supporting Biden. Now it's supporting Trump. Now it's
all good.
You just you can't laugh at this enough.
It's important to understand how serious it is
though.
I'm sure you are.
Now I'll include
this article because this is what they're pointing
to. And let's not forget this was taking
place before Trump came into power during Biden's
administration and is now continuing to be built
out and finished under Trump
because the government is a government, and they
are working as a government.
Or you can say together if you wanna
pretend they're two sides. The truth is this
was being done. So if you wanna pretend
that Biden's the deep state pedophile, then ask
why Elon Musk was working for a deep
state pedophile. Okay. And then and look. I'm
not I think they're all criminals and borderline
a lot of these things. The truth is
that Elon Musk was on either because he's
in a contractor for the government.
He's contracting for the government just like he
currently is for Twitter, in my opinion. And
so here he is building the world's largest
spy satellite network
around The United around the world, rather, excuse
me, so that they can spy on you.
The director of the National Reconnaissance Office quite
literally said, as always, I point this out,
now you can't hide because you're being constantly
looked at. And he points out that building
it is Elon Musk with the AI system
that allows us to work. That's what Larry
Ellison's talking about. Kinda they just of course,
they leave out the parts that are dystopian.
Right? That's all good and freedom and happy
until you're the one that says the wrong
thing, until you buy the wrong thing, until
you say the wrong thing, until you believe
the wrong thing. That's where this goes.
And you I mean, it's funny how everyone
can point it out when you can see
it on the other side.
And here, Stargate as well. There's Larry Ellison
right next to OpenAI,
right next to SoftBank, which in my opinion
represents Israel's funding of all these different startup
companies at least in one part.
Now
overlapping this point with
with Grok and AI. Right? We have to
understand how clear it is, how much Israel
one has infiltrated tech around the world, which
is transparent. But also that x and Twitter,
I think, are transparent as well. It's been
this way for a long time. I mean,
are we really gonna pretend like it's not
transparently clear that they're censoring very clearly in
the direction of Israel?
It's not even hard to prove. Grok has
admitted this, guys. Grok has said this out
loud, and then they altered it. Grok right
now, last I checked, was admitting they're committing
a genocide until I think they tweaked it
again.
But this person says, and just update because
this is what we recently talked about,
Musk's grok is cleared
for use
across
US government agencies.
So knowing that it is infiltrated by foreign
powers and knowing that they're actively working in
that regard to censor information about that foreign
power, now that that AI is being used
and infiltrated through all of these governments, I
think this just makes it even more obvious.
But my opinion, you decide for yourself. Also,
that it's Grok, as she says, the same
AI that he himself repeatedly and openly admits
to manually correcting every time it disagrees with
him.
How do you possibly make sense? Yeah. That's
not even a joke. That's public.
We just pointed to one where he goes,
yeah. I'm gonna correct this. Why? Because it
said something you and which by the way
was true that you didn't like.
So that's gonna be influencing government decisions. I
mean, yeah, we're already there. This is what
they're doing anyway, but this is just I
think, not only is it continuation of the
problem, it's a technological
increase, and it's also surveillance, but it's also
foreign powers
that are far more involved with this than
I think we ever seen before.
And here's the article we showed you before,
Newsweek. Elon Musk, Grok, AI Inc's deal with
Trump admin to integrate government.
The main points, federal agencies will now have
access to Grok four and Grok four Fast,
two of xAI's products through March
2027.
The idea is that these tools will help
to create a more transparent and efficient government.
I'm sure that's how it'll work out, guys.
What do you think? The partnership is the
latest between the Trump administration and big tech.
Right. You know, the same big tech that
Trump Jones called the deep state until they're
on your side. Now we're winning
with Meta, Microsoft. You know, Microsoft, they're completely
and objectively infiltrated company
by Israel. Like, I mean, objectively. This you
other ones you could argue are somewhat opinion.
But I think you could easily prove that
there's, you know, obvious points to be made
like the censorship on Israel or on
about Israel on Twitter. But this, guys, Microsoft
is I mean, I've gone over this many
times in recent shows.
Plenty of articles writing about how I mean,
there are people who work for them calling
out how they're hiring from the IDF.
So, I think that's important to think about.
But then it says, also joining with the
GSA at their AI tools or with their
AI tools for use by federal workers. In
this point, I thought was most obvious. We
will work hand in glove, the owner, co
owner of XAI says, with the entire government
to not only deploy AI, but to deeply
understand the needs of our government and make
America the world leader in advanced use of
AI. Because that's what we're all clamoring for.
Right?
It's coming down.
Now, just to one of the articles about
this, xAI's Grok was temporarily suspended, which I
think is just like the onion. I mean,
that's comically stupid.
Their Agrok their AI, right, that they they
got its own AI got censored by the
platform.
Why? For things you can prove are true.
I mean, that definitively proves to you that
they're censoring things about Israel that are absolutely
true because even Grok came back after the
suspension and said, I still argue they're true,
and they're still there.
So it's just funny how stupidly obvious that
is. But it says free speech tested, but
I'm back, says Grock after being suspended for
saying Israel and The US are committing genocide.
And let's be real. Again, it still said
that.
Also, by the way, on a quick side
note, I couldn't find this, by the way.
If you have any more insight, let me
know. It may it may be absolutely nothing,
because I can't see more than what it
says right here. But I found this interesting.
I was just searching more on XAI, and
I found this.
Explainable AI training in Israel. But what's interesting
is if I click on it,
it's gone.
So I can't look anymore.
But it may just be some kind of
overlap,
but it says the training in Israel online
is aimed at alternative level professionals who wish
to apply explainable AI techniques, which, by the
way, is a general thing outside of the
DARPA and overlap to Twitter.
Either way, maybe nothing, but I just found
that found that interesting. On top of that,
this is one point that I do think
is relevant.
OpenAI and XAI
in are are funding to, I think, what,
9 to $10,010,000,000?
A company called Tazafarm, which, by the way,
very quickly, guess what they're focusing on? AI
agents and autonomous software systems. Oh, like Grok.
Right? And very clearly, this company was invested
by XAI and I think is one of
the leading groups in that very development and
might be nothing. Maybe it's just they're paying
them to do something over here that competes
with their main product because that makes sense.
Right? Or
you can piece together that they might be
building the very thing together that they're using.
And one more example of Israel startup tech
influencing everything that's happening, or not. You can
decide. As always, I'll leave it there for
you to look at. And then I'll include
The US and Israel memorandum of understanding around
everything artificial intelligence in the country, which now
because we know that everything artificial intelligence has
been unsiloed as we were talking about, and
they have access to all of it for
the AI models for Palantir and XAI. And
we know Israel is completely immersed with XAI.
On top of that,
they have a memorandum of understanding around all
the things that are AI. So it means
Israel has access to train its models on
everything about you. Everything.
It's very easy to prove, and I've made
this point many times, guys. It's incredible to
me that this doesn't get more attention.
Now,
let's talk about a few things that Israel
is doing today that I just didn't want
you to miss that is relevant for the
last few parts we're gonna get into.
Pam Premfacker,
Doctors Without Borders. We referenced this before, but
I just want you to see this. Now
they tried briefly to kind of like insinuate
that they were Hamas somehow, but there's just
no evidence. I mean, there's no evidence for
any of it. They're lying about most everything
they say right now.
But this is a wild stretch. Because the
door Doctors Without Borders is there's not even
a connectable point. There's an a group that
goes anywhere in the world and sends people
to help people that are suffering. Right? Now
that's not to say that there's not criticism.
Their point is about the fact that it's
not Hamas. Okay? Doctors Without Borders is now
suspending their medical work in Gaza because
they're being attacked.
I mean, and we've we've got over the
examples, like, in real time where they're like,
look, we were just bombed. Here's the car.
What's going on? Nobody even cares.
Like, international community people and, like, rights groups
seem to be pointing it out, but none
of the government seem to even care about
this. Not even the ones that seem to
point out that they're against what Israel's doing.
Why? Because I think we all recognize that
right now everyone's grappling for some kind of
control, and I think most of them are
worried that Israel will do something to them.
Some of them say Israel bad, but then
absolutely go behind the scenes and go, no.
No. No. We didn't mean that. I promise
you this is happening because there's so much
the pager attacks, guys. I I actually genuinely
think that that's a major threat going on.
People don't know whether or not they've been
infiltrated by what that is, and they don't
know what to do.
I genuinely think that.
And it says, including air strikes and tanks
less than one kilometer from their facilities.
They've been bombed
and attacked with tanks, with air strikes,
doctors without borders.
Comes it says, come, come same day as
Netanyahu used his UN speech to scold dozens
of nations for accusing him of war crimes
as they stop working with people in Gaza
because they're being bombed, which by the way
is an egregious war crime, on top of
starvation and rape and torture and everything else
ongoing.
It just points like this that just it
it's just over the top.
That point alone in something else would be
the ultimate end all be all. Anything, Russia,
anybody else, that would be a huge breaking
end of the conversation that settles it. But
with Israel, it's like it doesn't even exist.
How do you not see what that shows
you? Breaking Israel bombs Gaza a 170
times
in the last twenty four hours. Technically, over
the twenty fifth, but the point is the
same. A 170
times in an area, by the way, which
you could prove has been bombed in almost
I mean, I think at this point, every
single location.
To some degree, whether every piece is destroyed
or not, they bombed the entire of the
Gaza Strip.
And then decided to bomb a 170 times
on top of their tents and bombed areas.
Assad says that's a bomb about every eight
minutes,
every hour for twenty four hours straight
on starving civilian populations
trapped in a strip of land the size
of Philadelphia.
After nearly two years of relentless attacks,
the scale of Israel's violence and atrocities is
staggering.
What else they're gonna do? I mean, at
this point, they they know we all see
it. They know that these governments are at
least right now allowing them to not call
it out and it'll continue.
So, what else would they do? Not just
double down, whatever you would call it. Five
times as hard. Just go as far as
you can, as fast as you can, and
hope that you could just destroy everything before
there's any kind of accountability.
So, what this has to show you is
your governments are a part of this.
There's really no way around that.
Life expectancy in Israel, in Palestine, Gaza,
occupied Palestine,
40 years old.
The current life expectancy, according to Save the
Children, according to a Lancet report,
40 years old. You know what it was
in 2023?
'75.
I just don't know how anybody can make
sense of any of these without recognizing the
obvious.
Thirty five years in one year, you shaved
off thirty five years from everybody
in one year, one and a half.
But no but no, it's completely not a
it's all up in the up and up.
Right?
It is. It's tragic. It's not just tragic
because it's an obvious genocide. It's tragic because
the whole world is being made complicit.
Doctor Simon Godek.
We've talked about this, what, five times now?
I I mean, tell me. Have you seen
Trump or anybody? All these screaming America Firsters
out there mentioned the American child that's currently
being held in Israel seven months now.
Seven months. Well, they didn't care about Shereen
Abu Clay. They don't care about any of
the Americans that are being killed. Seem to
only care about the Israelis that are being
killed.
16 year old American boy
went to visit family in the West Bank
and was apprehended and is held for seven
months now. Apparently, he's lost tons of weight.
He is he's sick with all kinds of
diseases because that's what happens when you're in
these torture dungeons, which is, like, literally what
they are, not the same way they use
them hyperbolically about places anywhere else.
Like, quite literally being shown to be tortured
and raped and manipulated and starved every time.
I mean, it's not even an opinion anymore.
Every single human rights group, including Beth El,
have made that case.
16 year old American boy has been held
in an adult male prison for seven months
without due process,
which is normal for Israel, by the way.
The child's name is Mohammed Ibrahim. He is
a third generation American citizen from Tampa, Florida.
I just I can't believe that this is
even possible. Where is everybody?
Think about this, guys. Don't you think there's
some honest people that would be like, Donald
Trump? What the hell? What about this American?
Doesn't that matter more than anything else, especially
since you love to pretend you're America first
or any of them? Hegseth, Bondi,
Kash Patel, Pongino. Are you guys America first?
Do you fight for Americans? I thought nobody
was above the law. I thought that every
you know, everybody's on watch and nobody's above
the law. What about this?
The child's name.
Mohammad Ibrahim, visiting
his parents in the West Bank.
Third generation American citizen from Florida.
He was not in the war zone in
Gaza.
He was accused of throwing rocks
at settlers, by the way, without evidence. Settlers
who go around and rape and burn homes
down. There's videos every thirty seconds that are
very easy to verify. Walking around, beating people
up. I just showed you one where they
literally beat that woman's head with a pipe
because she was sitting there and trying to
save her son from getting hit. And then
the IDF came up and aimed the guns
at the people who got beat up, because
that's what happens every day in Israel.
Without evidence, by the way. And let's just
even say he threw a rock at other
people who aren't authority figures.
Does that mean he gets arrested for seven
months without due process? In Israel, it does.
Because he's brown. I mean, that's really what
I mean, they don't even care he's an
American citizen. You know they must know this
by now. Right? They must know. Israel must
know he's an American. And they don't care.
That means they know for
a
must know he's an American, and
they don't care. That means they know for
a fact that they can do that,
and they're proving it right.
Where are the America first people out there,
guys? This should be the, like, the most
this should be the core issue for you
right now. This is a provable point that
they don't care about this American citizen, or
maybe because you guys don't care about him
if he's not a certain skin color or
I mean, he's not naturalized. He was born
here. So it's just proving a few things,
and I don't think that's the majority of
conservatives. But you ask Laura Loomer what she
thinks. I'm guarantee you already know what the
answer would be.
It says he was blindfolded and taken in
the middle of the night from his relative's
home. So think about this as an American,
guys. You're you're an American. You were born
in Florida. You grew up in Florida. Right?
Normal American kid.
You go to visit your family in another
part of the world and you get woken
up in the middle of the night, blindfolded,
arrested, and held for seven months.
Wouldn't you like to think that your government
would care about that? Wouldn't you like to
think in the world we live in that
something would happen?
I just I'm so blown away by this.
He lost a significant amount of weight
after his heart is deteriorating.
He should be in Florida with his family.
Instead, he's suffering unnecessarily in a country that
is not his home. But let's be brutally
clear. Why is Marco Rubio silent when a
16 year old American citizen is being held
without due process in an Israeli prison?
Starving, deteriorating,
powerless.
Why are Ted Cruz and Representative Fine, Randy
Fine, so vocal about everything else and not
lifting a finger about this American child being
held by a foreign government?
If Republicans won't fight for a 16 year
old American citizen rotting in a foreign prison,
what's left of their America first mantra?
Maybe the truth is simpler. DC isn't America
first at all. It's Israel first.
And even this, guys,
9,000 views for f's sake.
He's got a million followers.
Jeez. I'm just this is I feel like
this kind of thing, I wanna sit here
for four hours and just yell this story
over and over. And even then, it'll probably
get less reach than ever.
It's a special kind of insane that we're
in right now, isn't it?
Well, here's Leah Terrell. You know, while that
American citizen rots in a foreign prison of
the government he's handshaking right now, he says,
yesterday, I had my first Shabbat meal
next to the Israeli prime minister Netanyahu.
He called me a guardian of the Jewish
people.
I cherish that calling. Incredible to pray and
share a meal.
Israel Chai, he says.
And then tags Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, and
Netanyahu.
And you wanna explain that for me?
Not only because this is a person literally
committing genocide, and by law, he's supposed to
arrest this person or have that take place,
or that he's bowing to a foreign government
in any context, or how about the point
that is him saying,
I'm Yisrael Chai, and then tagging Donald Trump.
Why would he do that?
I'm over here meeting Netanyahu and having a
meal. Look at me, Donald Trump. Look at
me, Pam Bondi. Look at me. I'm doing
the thing that I'm supposed to be doing.
I mean, to really ask yourself, why would
he tag those people? I mean, it doesn't
make any sense unless you recognize him going,
like, I want the three of you to
see that I posted this.
How else do you take that?
I mean, we are so obviously in such
a lot. Right now, this country, guys, this
government is so transparently
taken. It blows me away.
Oh, look. He tagged some more too. Hey,
everybody. Look at me. Look at what you're
look at me saying the right things. Look
at me not caring about anything other than
Israel while I pretend to be America first.
He's the chair, by the way, of the
DOJ antisemitism
task force. You know, basically, the unconstitutional force.
Well, Harrat's reports, you know, that that Turel
doesn't care about, literally, Harrat's
Leading Israeli newspaper from the twenty sixth. It's
not about a state.
Israel's government wants to erase Palestinians.
Think about that.
Think about what your government's doing.
Now Mick Wallow says the same Obama
gave his full support to the Zionist project.
Here's Obama saying, there is no military rationale
for continuing the Gaza war,
which is the same thing they all do.
Yeah. Democrats have a good reach. The Epstein
files. Last thing they want. But they'll say
that because they know that Trump and the
rest are on there too, I would think.
That's my opinion. And so the point is
they but any other context, you know this
happens. They'll come out and go, do the
right thing.
But but if they were in power, they
would be quietly hiding, and the other side
would be going, do the right thing. Neither
of them want that. They wanna use the
argument for their benefit.
So here's Obama coming out. You know, Obama
is a very well presenting
authoritarian dictator.
And Mick Wallace says the same Obama gave
his full support to the Zionist project when
he was president
and was silent when Biden gave his unconditional
support to the genocide. See? See how this
starts to work if you're just not being
childish and standing back and looking at the
bigger picture?
Stop playing partisan division games and call out
anyone who deserves it.
Stand by principle, not partisanship,
guys. Now I wrote principles
not partisans.
Oh, and now I forgot the other one.
But I I felt better would have been.
Nah, I'd not forget. But anyway, it's the
the sentiment, guys.
Why are we allowing our partisan team politics
to be more important than the your principles?
Your integrity, your honor. That's what this comes
down to.
It's obvious that both sides play this game.
Stop playing it. Call them out, which is,
by the way, what I think is that's
what I think is starting to happen. I
just think no one's pointing to it. I
said the same thing during COVID nineteen, and
I was proven right.
My opinion, we'll find out.
Now in regard to where this is going,
two things. We're gonna talk about the updates
in regard to the ice point, and we're
gonna finish with the point of what's happening
and may happen. Let let let me know
in the chat, by the way, if there's
any more information on Portland. Seems to be
there about to deploy military.
Now the this is the show we recently
did. AI government is here. That was the
Elon Musk overlap, and it's well more than
just that one point, but that's a huge
obvious reality. The right votes down have seen
release,
and shootings highlight blind partisanship. Now this is
about the ice recent ice shoot Dallas shooting
and the others.
Watch that if you want more information on
some of these things. But here's a bond
he put out yesterday.
I have witnessed the continued onslaught of violence
perpetrated against ice. See, already start with a
lie. Okay? Because there's examples
of of act people acting against them in
many ways, by the way, which you can
very easily see why people act in that
way. Not rationalizing or justifying it, just simply
pointing out that when they're openly and, like,
brazenly breaking the law and then laughing at
you about it, maybe somebody might get upset
about that. Hey. If it breaks the law,
put them in jail. Arrest them. Arrest them.
Charge them. Due process. Evidence. Put them in
jail. Yeah. Right. No one disagreeing with that.
But the point is still the same that
it's easy to understand why when you bash
in their window and shoot at their family,
you know, maybe they're gonna take that personally.
I mean, just not it's not if you're
not a blind follower, it's easy to understand
why people are getting upset. But even then,
even then, you can easily prove that the
claim of a thousand percent increase was completely
made up. Even Grok will tell you that.
It was completely from Homan and their statements
online, and they're all just parroting it. It's
the same thing they both do all the
time. Again, same time. Oh, it's not both
sizing the issue. When you do that, we're
I'm trying to show you that it's what
your government does.
You just divide it and look at it
in two things. The reality is whatever side
it is, your government takes the same kind
of action. They will lie to you about
what's going on. In this case, they made
this up because they need to, you know,
bolster the argument that we're all being basically,
they were gonna do things that are unconstitutional,
and they're getting people on their side to
think it makes sense because, look, they're bad
people.
That's my point from the whole thing, but
it doesn't matter. I don't care if it's
a 10000%
increase in ICE. Don't You can't break the
law. You can't violate our rights. It doesn't
matter. I'll pull the law. Do your job.
Hire more people. Go out there and do
it the right way. Prove they're committed a
crime. Put them in jail. It's just insane
that we think anything else makes sense. Because
all you're really doing, whether or not there's
a thousand percent, and again, you can prove
they're making that up.
The reality is clear.
If somebody breaks the law, you can arrest
them. I don't know why that's complicated. Everything
else is about you building a construct to
be able to apply that more broadly.
Why do we want the government to be
able to more broadly apply the law? I
mean, think about it for a second. That
doesn't make any sense. The law is there.
It exists. Charge them or not. To make
some
excuse about why it can be broadly applied
is authoritarian. I mean, it's it's what they're
doing. They're creating the justification to take action
against anybody they want for any reason,
which both sides will use or rather just
your government.
It says the Department of Justice will not
stand idly by in the face of such
lawlessness,
You know, despite the fact that they're literally
like, lawlessness might as well be tattooed on
their forehead.
Rampant lawlessness. I mean, what they're doing with
this is lawless. So it's kind of stupid
for them to even say that. But at
my direction, I'm deploying DOJ agents to ICE
facilities.
Okay? I mean, you've so you have ICE
facilities who are in of in of themselves
supposed to be authority pickers. You've got local
police. You've got national guard here. But now
you're gonna deploy more people to protect the
front. I mean, it doesn't all this is
piece piecemeal
martial law.
I you know, again, if this was Biden,
you damn well know what you'd be saying.
If it was Obama, even if it was
the same if it was exactly the same
excuse, and even if he actually meant it,
you'd still be going. It's it's it's a
lie, and it's all about that probably, but
but you're willing to call it out if
it's the other side.
And whenever ICE comes under siege to safeguard
federal agents, protect federal property, and immediately arrest
all individuals engaged in federal crime. Yeah. But
you can already do that. You don't need
some new construct to arrest people breaking the
law. Seems pretty simple.
Pursuant to president Trump's recent executive action, I'm
also instructing the joint terrorism task forces. Here
we go. I mean, guys, we've been telling
you this is coming.
In fact, for more than this administration.
But I just had this conversation, and here
we are.
I didn't predict this exact thing with this
group, but I'd the sentiment was the same.
This is where it was going. The domestic
terrorism, the focus on you. COVID was a
focus on you as the battle your body
was the new battlefield. Now we're shifting further
into that direction in regard to the entire
encompassing security state, the technocratic security state, which
is overlapping
with the biological,
biodigital convergence as well, but that's a different
conversation.
This is about creating
the the you know, like, we look, we
have the national guard deployment forces. You've got
joint terrorism task force. You've got,
a random ice rolling forces.
I mean, how do you not look at
that and go, yeah. That I mean, that
that's what freedom looks like. A bunch of
mass unidentified
random agents from different groups that already been
I mean, it's just so ridiculous, guys. This
is some somebody comments. Like, yeah. That's really
smells like freedom.
Now, the only thing that makes sense for
some people is that, well, that's what the
left did. They have to be drunk. That's
my argument.
Even if you actually think the left is
doing things that justify this, you don't need
unconstitutional
illegal acts to stop it.
You're just being played.
Even if they actually stop
it.
But it says to investigate all entities and
individuals engaged in acts of domestic terrorism. Well,
we already see this, and we you were
all the right. We you were calling it
out when Biden was there. Wearing a red
hat makes you domestic terrorist. Right? Being in
a trucker convoy, you're a terrorist.
Vanilla ISIS, you're a Nazi because you believe
certain things. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. I called that
all out when it happened. Now I'm calling
it out when you guys all on the
team sports side do it to the left.
You're a Nazi because you're in a left
group. You're a Nazi because or rather not
Nazi, but you're a terrorist because you say
fascist.
Who knows? Maybe. But that's not a real
that that's not a real thing to say.
We're creating domestic terrorism into the category that
can apply to your enemy. People you don't
like, things that we don't like that are
said, accusations about Donald Trump. Right? People who
say things that are unkind that we can
pretend mean kill him. It's just it's exactly
you're the left. I mean, that's what's so
embarrassing. That's why so many conservatives are starting
to see it because you're literally doing what
you called out from the left. But that's
usually how this ends up when you're a
student of the long term government picture.
It says including the repeated acts of violence
and obstruction against federal agents. So now
obstruction
of federal agents, she just said, is domestic
terrorism.
Just like that. And you, as usual, Pam
Bondi and her clumsy action reveal the thing
you're kinda not supposed to point out so
obviously, which is that because again, words are
obvious. K? It says,
individuals engaged in acts of domestic terrorism, comma,
including,
very clear,
the repeated acts of violence and obstruction against
violence. Sorry. Okay. Obstruction against agents.
Including obstruction against agents. So if you let's
okay. How about this? What if an agent's
breaking the law? What if they come up
and they and they don't identify themselves, they
don't give a warrant, and they, you know,
do something even more illegal than that, even
though that's more than enough, and you push
back,
which by the way is your legal right
despite how much that might upset somebody,
despite you framing that's me inciting violence. No,
no, the law is not inciting violence. Your
constitutional rights is not inciting violence. You responding
to that in a crazy way would be,
right?
The point is that you have every right
to say, I don't know what's happening. You're
not identifying yourselves. I don't even know if
you're an agent. I know you're wearing a
vest, but I don't know that. There's examples
all over the place of people dressing up
like ICE agents and raping and torture,
and stealing. I've gone over this many times.
There's four examples I can have. I guarantee
it's more than that.
So here we are.
Federal agents being obstructed
is terrorism. Now let's just even say that's
an actual thing. Like, I mean, like that
it actually happened. So there's an agent doing
an investigation, and you go up and you
push him to the ground and whatever. You
really
disrupt his investigation. Okay. Now that's terrorism if
it's somebody that they think is on the
left.
How do we let this happen?
The Department of Justice will seek the most
serious available charges against all participants in these
criminal mobs. Right. So now you're a protest
that they've already told you. Left the organized
groups with their signs. They're all domestic terrorism.
They just keep saying these things. So
you now are part of those protests that
they called mobs.
And somebody comes in and provocateurs and causes
violence. Or let's just even say one person
commits violence. Not everybody, but the one person
they use to justify you all as a
left crazy lunatic radical mob.
They are telling you they will seek the
most extreme charge they possibly can for anybody
involved. All they're doing is convincing you that
you better not do anything. As Americans, you
better just keep your mouth shut because Donald
Trump is gonna push the envelope.
Yep. That's how this works,
including conspiracy offenses, assault offenses, civil disorder.
Are you kidding me?
Civil disorder? Guys, you know how benign that
ultimately is? That could be the but they're
telling you we're gonna go domestic terrorism all
day long.
They only strengthen our resolve to complete the
work begun.
Whatever that thing what do you know? I'm
sure you think you know what that is.
Sadly, you probably don't.
To the end, I have directed the FBI,
DEA, ATF, and USM the military
to accelerate our efforts alongside the Department of
Homeland Security to locate, apprehend, detain, prosecute, and
remove illegal aliens. Oh, so oh, now now
it's about illegal aliens.
So you're so you're telling me that we
need military deployment, national guard, ICE, ATF, FBI,
and only for rounding up these illegal aliens?
No. Yeah. You might think that makes sense
with all the numbers they lie about, but
they're telling you this is not what it's
about.
With their very actions that are making it
clear that they're using that, just like we
told you, around biometrics and everything else, to
rationalize
literal military deployment.
Jack Posobie points out what she's referencing there,
as he as he claims, that's 200
joint
forces task forces across America. 200. So when
I told you they had those few about
the National Guard that they were already ready,
there was only supposed to be a few
of them, but they could deploy across the
country. Well, there's 200,
as he claims, joint terrorism task force deployments.
So now you've got 200 little deployment groups
all across the country that can be rapidly
deployed for whatever. This is martial law. I
don't care how you pretend you wanna make
sense of this. You're talking about military deployment,
always on on always there, ever present, ready
to be deployed.
Because that's the national national guard point. This
is overlapped with probably both, to be honest.
Mario Nafal comes out and says, the White
House releases the list of political agitators.
This is where it just
gets comically stupid. Because what's so embarrassing is
the people like Stephen Miller still pushing in
the screaming that if they say fascism, that
means they're violent. Or that means they're they're
inciting violence, go arrest them. Despite the fact
that he and every one of the other
ones have called everybody else a fascist a
100 times.
That's how dumb this all gets, and they
don't care. They're just gonna bull rush it
in like they did everything else in the
courts and everywhere else. This is a deadly
silent, a deadly assault on an ice field
office in Dallas,
which by the way was deadly for the
detainees
and the whole weird psyop around the story,
being tied to years of inflammatory rhetoric on
top Democrats. Right. Right. It's simple as that.
Even though we can't prove that, we're gonna
go, all of you doing that is why
this happened.
Certainly possible. Right? But how about it's just
as easy to say, all of the Republicans
are because of that.
Right. Right. There's no evidence either way. So
why not? Right? Why don't you just blame
blame aliens? It's just it's no the say
it's just as logical I mean, that's not
really, but it's gotta be hyperbolic.
You know it's just as logical to say
either way because there's no evidence.
But it says, officials say a gunman with
anti ice. Right. Somebody who wrote with a
ballpoint pen on
bullets they didn't fire,
anti ice. Because that's what we all say,
anti ice. I mean, have you when have
you even heard anybody call themselves anti ice?
I'm sure it exists.
But as many point out, like with Kyle
Robinson, squad, all these all these terms that
just don't make sense for the age group
for anything
other than authorities writing it out or Bongino
or we know how whatever you could picture
them clumsily writing down the you know, who
knows what actually happened? Maybe that was real.
That's also possible.
Specifically targeting federal agents. But see, they keep
saying that, and you can't prove that.
The point was that if you understand the
story was that they he was an edge
lord type, right, on 4chan, which by the
way is far more associated with the right
than anything else, but it's not proven which
side he's on because the reality is it
seems he's politically he's apolitical and was really
about, you know, manipulating that's what those terms
are for. Like, people that
troll all sides and like to make fun
of everybody political. So anti ice, as all
his friends said, there's no way he meant
that in legitimate sense. He's doing he that
that was his trolling, essentially. But, of course,
they could be lying too. At the end
of the day, you question everything, but the
reality is the evidence in no way can
prove that we know who he was targeting.
But they all sell it the same way.
But don't worry. Let's boop Jimmy Kimmel off
the air because he said exactly what we're
saying in reverse. That way, no, he was
MAGA. No, you don't. Just like you don't
know it was a lefty person. You can't
prove that with Robinson or anybody else so
far.
But it's but what do all of it
lead to?
Suppression,
censorship,
control of your life. Funny how that always
is the common thread.
It says the administration points to a staggering
1000%.
Great journalism, bud. Did you even look it
up? Did you even try to find that
evidence? Because it doesn't exist. But Narfahl is
just a mindless repeater.
Arguing the escalation mirrors the language of elected
leaders from calling agents Gestapo, which is exactly
what they are doing. Like, literally identical to
that conversation. So how dare you call them
a a word that makes sense for what
they're doing? And slave patrol. I mean, look.
These are just simply words.
The idea that you ever argue that them
saying something leads to they're saying words are
violence.
That's what they're doing. Didn't we all laugh
when the left was doing that? Yes.
The White House warned these labels have crossed
into dangerous incitement. There it is. That's exactly
what they were saying about the left. And
they all said, oh, you're so stupid. You're
woke politics.
Here's what they're pointing to, though. This is
where it gets even more ridiculous.
So here's what they're claiming is incitement to
violence.
Walt saying modern day gestapo. You know, sort
of like you saying they're
what you know? They're I mean, look. Calling
someone a terrorist is a little bit more
serious than pretty much everything on this list.
But I still wouldn't argue that means they're
doing it they they can say what they
want because that's real free speech. That's what
principled action and stance looks
like. Governor Newsom
likened ICE to secret police. Authoritarian.
Are you kidding me? That you're gonna point
to somebody calling them secret police and authoritarian?
Not only is that literally what they're doing,
but even if it was wrong, how is
that incitement? You guys are such children. This
is what the White House put out. And
it also shows you if this is the
best they can do, think about how crazy
it is. I can show you examples of
the right doing saying things that are way
more extreme.
But I still wouldn't argue they're responsible for
people's actions because that's stupid. And because the
principle of free speech applies.
It says, claim the country is becoming Nazi
Germany. Yeah, it is, left and right, by
the way. But I guess that's why you
know, you get the point, guys. Oh my
god. He said they were they they're a
betrayal.
Betrayal.
They're they're violent. Arrest them. Like, this is
the kind of Stephen Miller stupidity.
Thugs.
He called them thugs. How dare you? I
mean, what they're doing here is proving to
you that they don't believe in free speech.
That's all this is.
Terror force. Okay. You call them a terrorist
all day long.
Accused them of kidnapping and resisting.
It inspired yes.
Guys, they're arresting people without warrants, without identifying
themselves. Are you stupid or are you just
willfully
deceptive?
Probably both. You get it. It goes all
of them are like that. They're ever the
worst thing you're gonna find is terrorist.
And that's what they're calling all of them.
So here is I'm just gonna play some
of them. Ted Cruz put this out yesterday.
Here's over seven minutes of Democrats at the
federal, state, and local levels inciting violence.
It's the same thing. It's literally a list.
That was a list of all these things.
Donald Trump's modern day Gestapo Gestapo is scooping
folks up off the streets.
That's the first Gestapo.
You're inciting violence.
No way they're literally doing that. Right? That
literally do but see, this is the right
creating a situation where they can claim your
words are violence. So you you can be
charged, arrested, held accountable.
Alright? So they'll come after someone like me
for the free for my right to say
what I think is happening. Like, what if
you, god forbid, actually think that they're like
Gestapo? Even if you're wrong, they're telling you
now that's inciting violence, so you're not allowed
to have an opinion if it differs from
what they say because you're now violent? Guys,
this is authoritarian.
It's exactly what you call down the left.
Have the courage to call that hold it
out. And it gets all like this. All
They're in unmarked vans wearing masks They are.
And shipped off to foreign torture dungeons. Yep.
Literally. I mean, do we not we forget
that El El Salvador
was the reality of what they did there
has now been proven?
The the the gay guy was
sexually abused. He was beat up.
I mean, every one of them had the
same story. But how dare he say that
because he's a democrat?
Ignorance. No chance to mount a defense,
not even a chance to kiss a loved
one goodbye. True. Just grabbed up by mass
agents, shoved into those vans, turned disappeared. True.
Now do I think he is a good
person fighting for freedom? No. I don't. Doesn't
mean he's lying, though. Or rather, it doesn't
mean that's not true. The point is that
people who manipulate you with the true the
best manipulations
usually use mostly truth. So right now, they're
using these things because they know it's easy
to use this to gain momentum from their
side when they need that. So they can
be we're the good ones doing the right
things when the reality is they're just gonna
come back and do the same thing from
the other side. But they get you to
think they're the right one just like they've
convinced the right on this moment that they're
the ones doing the right thing while they
do exactly what they called out on the
left.
This is why it's become so cartoonish right
now. And, again, hopefully, with media like ours
and IMA and everybody else, I think it's
a large momentum that's happening. People are seeing
this because I don't think Americans are as
dumb as they want them to be.
In fact, I think it's the I mean,
look, I know there's a lot of people
that have, through social engineering and what else,
are are are, you know, losing the plot.
But I believe that I think I think
what we're proving with this and what's happening
right now and the peep that the fact
that they're losing control of all this is
is evidence to me that Americans are smarter
than they want them to be. Not just
stupid, like, not dumb, but, like, aware of
these things. Like, we are proving to the
world that we see these things. I know
it's hard to see, but at least consider
that. When you compare
the old films of the Gestapo grabbing grabbing
people off the streets of Poland, and you
compare them
to those
nondescript
thugs who grabbed that that student, that graduate
student, it does look like a gestapo operation.
Yeah. It literally does, guys. Why is that
so hard for you to wrap your mind
around? Like, even if you disagree, that's go
look the videos up. It's like the point
is it's not about whether you agree with
it or not. That
even if he was saying they're monster terrorists
that deserve to be put down, it's not
his responsibility that other people took action. We
gotta be real about this. Oh, I forgot
to announce in the beginning.
We're gonna be having a panel on the
thirtieth with the IMA. James Corbett will be
there, Off Guardian, Derek, myself, a bunch of
us have already agreed to be there. And
we're gonna be having a large conversation that
we probably will disagree on. I think it's
one that you should not miss because I
am taking this to the extreme. And I
don't mean, like, in a radical extreme way.
I mean to the point that we're gonna
take this to a level that is difficult
to talk about but is necessary.
And I'm gonna be erring on the side
of free speech like we should be. And
so my point there is, look, if somebody's
saying, take out that person, I understand why
we've worked this into the world to be
that that person should be, and I get
it. That's wildly responsible. But here's where we
get into the point, where if you did
that and something happened, the government should never
be involved with speech ever.
But somebody could take action personally. You could
sue them, for example.
Right? There's all sorts of other things in
record. But the government stepping in and saying,
what you said caused that, you're in trouble,
was the moment we lost our way
in the in that conversation. There's plenty more
of them. But guess what? That's not what
they're doing. They're saying they're thugs.
Isn't that what you guys say about the
left every thirty seconds? Yes. And many of
you believe it. And many of you are
right. Doesn't mean that anything anybody does because
of that is now their responsibility.
It's the same thing you would have said
about this in reverse and you damn well
know it. But here they are rattling off
a bunch of protected speech statements as if
that's proof that they're inciting violence. These are
people who are quite literally trying to destroy
this country, undermining
first principles
for, I mean, either destruction or somebody else's
benefit. You know, my dad
served in the in second World War. He
fought the Nazis. And I That same point.
Do I think this person's a good person
fighting a group? I don't believe any of
them are. My personal opinion. I'm jaded. I
could be wrong, definitely, but I'm
I'm pessimistic when it comes to government because
we have the right to be. Doesn't mean
that these statements are false. I think he's
looking down right now, and he's happy that
I'm fighting today's Nazis.
Because if we just roll this clock on
the wall back
seventy five years,
we'd be looking at a time
in Nazi Germany
where people ran around with signs like this
new ice sign that says report all foreign
invaders to ice, which is real, by the
way. And the point is that is I
a very fucking
I did I wasn't gonna cuss right there.
That just sounded bad.
My words sounded funny when they came out.
But very,
you know, I mean, it's exactly what they're
doing. It it is, like, identical to the
reality of what's happening.
So you're not allowed to make the you
know, you it's all the same point, guys.
And you can go through this over and
over and over. It's fair it's all the
same stuff. At the boast, you're gonna get
terrorist, which is exactly what they're all calling
the left by and large right now. You
know, it's just it's so lazy to pretend
like this is enough. If you're an American
and you believe in free speech, you should
be outraged that they're even trying to suggest
that statements now the major point here is
to understand the difference between when the government's
involved and when when that's not.
The fact that they're doing this and the
fact that people like Cruz are saying, look,
look, they can't say, that's him inserting the
government, whether they're government agents or not.
The reality is that as an individual, you
can take action personally. You can go punch
them in the face you want. They can
sue you for that, or you could sue
them for something they did. Take fire in
a theater. If somebody says fire the fire
and they lied about it, you trip over
and you break your ankle. The government is
not allowed to get involved with that because
you're allowed to say what you want. You,
however, can sue that person and say you
caused this. You have to sue anybody for
anything. And a judge may find reasoning and
say, yes. That well, that makes sense. They
did do that. That has nothing to do
with constitutional rights. That's you deciding to sue
based on what you think happened. The theater
owner can sue them and say, you caused
this to happen. Now nobody wants to come
here anymore. Like, the reality is that the
the moment we allowed the government to be
involved with things like that was the moment
we lost connection with that. We we rather,
we blurred the lines of what the reality
is there. Any old fire in a theater
stood there for a long time before they
pushed that envelope further, but we have to
realize what that really was.
Now, just for time, I mean, you can
go through the whole damn thing. Right? You
can go through and listen to them.
No matter what it takes, no matter how
long it takes, we'll, of course, be identified.
Oh, wait. Was I playing that?
With uncle Sam there. I was gonna say,
does it play on the on the screen
the whole time? Hold on. Here here's I'm
just gonna jump to one and let you
listen. That's literally what's going on. You have
called to abolish ICE.
How do we achieve a future that's post
ICE? Mhmm. How
do we achieve You can listen to the
whole thing if you want. All it is
is about abolish ICE. Oh, no. How dare
you call to abolish ICE? You mean, like,
you've called to abolish any number of institutions
and groups? So next time somebody goes and
attacks WHO or or you you know, it
just it just it's,
like, it's worthy of ridicule
because they know they're doing the same thing,
and yet they don't care that their side
sees them. That shows you that they're working
for something else, in my opinion. Anyway, feel
free to watch it all. Every one of
those is the same kind of thing. Here's
Ted Cruz trying to use it. The Democrat
party is actively putting law enforcement in danger.
Do what you couldn't even argue that him
misrepresenting what they're saying like that is the
same thing in reverse? Yes. You could. But
he has every right to say what he
wants
because that's free speech.
Well, here's Stephen Miller. Look at the modern
day Goebbels, which is the, you know, Nazi
propagandist.
Here's what he has to say. Let's not
forget, by the way, the reality of where
the Comey situation currently is. Who knows what's
ultimately gonna happen? But you know what I
think. I think the evidence already shows you
that this was never even intended to go
anywhere, but just meant to make you feel
like things were changing and happening. But here's
what Miller had to say.
Well, and Clapper,
Brennan,
Obama,
Monaco,
all conspired together,
all work together. Don't you love how they
just keep screaming that? You know, they they've
called Obama a treasonous,
a traitor,
which are very serious terms with legal definitions
many times, and yet he's somehow not in
prison. Isn't that funny?
If they feel like they like, you understand,
even Obama could quite literally sue them for
libel. If they're making a statement like that
and there's nothing to back it up or
rather no evidence to put him in jail,
You know my opinion.
I think these people are very dangerous criminals.
And
the point is, I say I make it
a point to say this more specifically now
because I say put them in jail. What
I mean is always is go through the
right process. I think they're criminals. That's why
I think it's going to end up that
way if there's a real system, but I'm
never saying do that process.
Charge them with a crime, present the evidence,
give due process, and put them in jail
with every single one of them. I think
that's where we should go with these people
who are committing crimes. But
he and the rest have been screaming this
forever.
They said they were gonna arrest Hillary Clinton
the rest last time.
But then he said, they're good people. I'm
glad I didn't do that. But
then Jones comes in in 2024 and says,
oh, it's coming down. Clinton, Obama, and everyone's
gonna go to jail if we keep them
alive. And yet here we are again.
How many times can these people lie to
you right to your face? Or how many
times can the CIA give Jones and people
nonsense that they repeat without caring about the
cotton side effects?
To try to sabotage,
undermine,
unravel
the democratic institutions
and structures of this country.
The Russiagate hoax, the Russiagate conspiracy,
and all of the assaults against our liberties
that went with it, the predawn re I
mean, think about everything that's going on in
the world right now, and we're still pretending
like the Russiagate lie is what we really
care about. I get it. There's a lot
it was very, very bad and clumsy what
they tried to do.
But nobody ever did anything about it on
either side of this, and I don't think
they're even trying right now. I think this
is about feigning action to continue to manipulate
the partisan sides. But either way,
this is what you really care about more
than anything? I mean, Trump ended up in
power regardless. Like, it's just so funny that
we're all just fixating on something that is
about Democrats need to be tortured, or rather
the best word for is punished.
That's what this really comes down to. We
don't even care why. Arrest them all. Find
something to charge them with. They deserve it.
That's what a lot of these team sport
players are basically even saying out loud. Gavin
McGinnis told you. Yes. We're being hypocrites. We
don't care. They deserve it. Well, thank you
for being honest, but you're a hypocrite. And
it shows you that you're just as bad
as them if you're doing the same thing
in reverse.
AIDS, the handcuffing of innocent Americans,
the the
Oh, really? Like, that's
you know, he's talking about before.
Oops.
You could've you know, you mean, like, right
now? Like, you're doing all across the country
for people that, like, we just showed you
the American citizen that was arrested and tased
and hospitalized until they went, like, oops, you're
American. My bad. And let them out.
The only way that happens is if they
arrest people because they're brown. That's it. There's
no way you could miss and every one
of these cases, these people are screaming. I'm
an American. I've got videos of it, three
or four of them so far. Like, with
with that exact circumstance where they're going, I'm
an American. I'm an American. And they're beating
them up and shoving them down, and then
they later find out that they've got an
ID in their pocket.
Freedom, democracy. Spinach against president Trump's campaign and
staff,
the removal of his national security adviser,
one fake indictment, one fake charge after another.
This Oh, exactly. An indictment that's fake. Like,
that's never happened before. Right?
Are you not funny how all these clowns
out there are trying to scream to you
that this indictment proves everything? Well, look at
that. It doesn't.
Shocking, I know, when you understand the facts
of things. No. Indictments are just accusations, and
you could manufacture whatever you want, which is
kinda what's happening now if you understand. Like,
do you realize how much you could actually
go after Comey for? Do you realize how
much you could actually go after Clinton, Obama?
My god. Are you kidding me? Like, how
about you start going after all the crimes,
like, Obama committed while he was illegally bombing
people all over the world? But you know
why they won't do that? Because Trump's doing
the same thing right now. You see, it's
a construct, guys. You're being played. And I
hope they go to jail, but I kinda
think you know it's not gonna happen.
God, this guy just makes me sick. He's
just such a you can just see it
as I called him, the dead eyed sociopath.
Now Eric Doherty, one of these, you know,
really kinda just bullying for the top position
of blind Trump supporter right now, And he
says, breaking. Gavin Newsom is being accused of
purposely putting a target on the back of
Stephen Miller. Why? Because he posted Stephen Miller
is a fascist, which he quite literally is,
but so was Gavin Newsom, so is Trump.
But who cares if it's accurate?
He said the fascist word. He's trying to
get me killed, says an actual fascist.
Again, don't hear that as one-sided. I see
them both in the same way, but it's
just funny to me. And Stephen Miller goes,
why do you think they posted this?
And then this person goes, awkward, Eric. Because
here's Eric going, dude, you're a fascist
to Biden.
Isn't it just lazy?
I just makes me it just makes me
laugh like these people are literal children.
You think he doesn't know that? He's just
going along because that's the game. Lie. Rampantly
lawless. Just do it all. Freedom. Right? Well,
by the way, here's Trump calling them fascist
too. Biden
American politics today is between these far left
fascists
led by Harris and her group. We have
a fascist person running
who's incompetent.
She's a Marxist, communist, fascist,
socialist.
She's not actually a socialist. She's gone past
that. Somebody's got to explain this woman. There's
a radical left Marxist communist fascist.
Right? But who cares though? Because when he
said it, it was true. Yep. Right? Same
thing in her. It's just so funny to
me. Yeah. I agree. But it's also true
with you guys. And even if it's not
true, it's just a word. Are you that
I mean, you're like, I've I taught people
sometimes online when you're going back and forth
with partisans. You are the left, you so
despise. Because some of them are genuine people
who just don't see it because they're blinded
by partisan politics.
And it's a good call. It's a good
thing to say because hopefully, it'll make them
think about it for a second, but probably
not. But it's a good thing to jab
them with. Right? Like, you are literally the
left you think you're fighting. How embarrassing.
Here's Laura Loomer. I'm gonna skip this for
time, but it's
because it's a four and a half minute
video, and I just I I wanna get
to the final part here.
But I I guess, as always, guys, there
is something uniquely disgusting about Laura Loomer. And
I don't mean that in anything other than
just her her I who she is as
a person.
Because that's, like, the most insulting way I
mean this. But, I mean, it's everything that
she's doing, the way that she frames things,
who she talks about, the way she talks
about them, the petty, disgusting, small way that
she goes after anything she can for the
smallest amount of light. In half the time,
she's lying or been proven to be wrong
or eating dog food for a lie. Who
cares? Because it's all left. It's all Muslims.
It's whatever what they need to sell you
on. And she says, here this is so
funny. Jihadist congresswoman,
Ilhan Omar. Like, do I think Ilhan Omar's
honest? No. Do I think she's part of
the problem? Yes. But this geh hottest?
Aren't you guys the one right now saying
that fault that calling me a fascist is
incitement?
And so you turn around and call her
a jihadist?
You know, are you so is your point
that you're not fascist and that's why it's
incitement? What are you I mean, I'll read
the rest. She goes, just went on MSNBC
to cry about me and call her call
to be charged for aiding and abetting and
calling her for excuse me. She's mad at
Loomer
for calling her to be charged for aiding
and abetting Islamic terrorists.
Why? Because as president Trump called her out
on through social for radical behavior,
god,
the whole immigration fraud, marrying her brother. The
point is the idea that you can claim
she's a domestic terrorist.
Do you have evidence? Are you claiming she's
working with terrorist groups? Or are you just
simply saying that she has association with a
group that you think is part of a
Muslim thing that you then call terrorist or
because she is supporting Palestine or your lazy,
childish, nonsensical arguments that are used to make
very serious,
excuse me, very serious legal accusations?
I mean, at some point, somebody's gonna have
to put this person in your place. And
I mean, like, in a real legal sense.
Like, somebody has to come out this is
my point about free speech. Does she have
a right to say it? Yes. But you
have a right to sue her, and that's
their whole f around and find out, for
literal libel, like for provable misrepresentation
that you can quite literally prove in court.
I'm not even talking about this person. I'm
talking about any number of things that she's
done, and it is embarrassing.
Guy, you realize how many very real prominent
Republicans have done?
They've tried really hard to distance her from
all of them because she makes them look
like idiots. Because I think that that's the
point. I think that she is the hyperbolic
cartoon of what, like, Israel wants Republicans to
look like.
She's MSNBC asked her if she's gonna sue,
adding that there is no evidence that Omar
is tied to terrorists. And a lumer doubles
down as always. Oh, there's plenty of evidence,
and I have been documented for years. It's
always some subject some subjective connection to a
group that is Muslim that she claims are
all jihadists. That's about the level of her
work. And it says to Uyla Omar, I
see you were about cry gonna cry during
your interview. And then on display is her
very small petty personality.
I want you to cry so much when
you are finally held accountable by the Trump
administration that you have to take the sweaty
terrorist rag off your head and use it
as a handkerchief to wipe the snot and
tears from your face. That's what she just
wrote.
And she means the hijab. Right? You know,
the the sweaty terrorist rag that an entire
culture of people wear around the world. This
person is so
in particular disgusting.
You say you don't have terror ties, it
would be terrorist tie, you moron. I'll be
the judge of that when I get x
access to your text messages. Oh oh, so
that you mean you don't know for sure.
But you're building this entire subjective case. Somebody
needs to put this person down a peg.
And I mean that in in the very
real sense of, keep suing her for these
bombastic claims that she does all over online,
or the fact that she doxes people all
the time, or the fact that she does
any number of things that are literally worthy
of lawsuits.
It says your email, bank records, your communication
with people in Somalia, your travel records, your
donor records, your marriage records.
Wow.
Or here she is saying, The US is
is being taken over by Muslim invaders, and
nobody in the GOP is doing any stop
it, except literally the entire team is fighting
for Israel. But either way,
here, she's pointing to
Derek Evans saying, this is a Trump Tower
in New York City. Okay? We're being conquered,
and no one's talking about it. Okay? So
what you're seeing is a bunch of American
citizens and or possibly other illegal aliens or
people that have citizenship or Visa or green
card. The point is they don't know that
either. And quite frankly, what you can see
is most of these things are put on
by people there supporting Palestine and are local.
But the point is always is could there
be somebody? Yes, obviously, but the reality is
these are Muslims in The United States supporting
Palestine and praying.
How dare they in a country that pretends
to be about religious freedom, right?
This is just disgusting or very, very, very
racist and ignorant.
We're being overtaken. Now here's my point.
What law are they breaking?
If you okay. Public disorder. Whatever. Okay. Fine.
Go after that.
What law is it that you think that
they're
invading? Okay. Let's just even say and I've
look. I can prove to you that Israel
is quite literally
using groups just like this
to infiltrate different places, and they're working for
an Israeli agenda. That may mean every Muslim
or every brown person, not even remotely. The
point is that is being done and you
can prove it on a daily basis where
they dress up like Muslims, they dress up
like Palestinians, and they carry out these acts.
It's been going on for a year. It's
going on for seventy six years.
Haratz has written about it, for crying out
loud. But, anyway, the point is that I
can prove to you that there are people
doing exactly that, largely the opposite of what
you think. But the the real idea is
that let's just say there is that, which
again, that's my point of saying that.
And they're infiltrating
and filling out and they're and they're going
to say, okay,
when they break the law, charge them for
a crime.
I know it's so complicated. Right?
But Ryan, they're building a secret network. Okay.
Well, the reality is we're supposed to be
the ones with principles. We're supposed to be
the ones with, you know, that are actually
fighting for something better in the world. So
if you actually think that, well, first of
all, let's prove that. Let's not use idiots
like Laura Loomer to point to people praying
in a very legal way of just Muslims
who live in New York City and make
that out to be somewhat. I understand there
is elements of things that I honestly don't
want people I don't think people recognize how
obviously Israel's involved with that. But reality is
if they break the law, charge them for
a crime. Outside of that, everything else is
nonsense.
Right? So let's just there's a building thing
and they carried an act. That do you
you don't think that's already happened throughout our
history and the reality that your government's involved
with half of them? I'm not saying it's
a good thing. The point is the only
thing you can do is enforce the law
and stand to your principles.
Now look. Am I saying they should investigate?
No. You see, this is where people lose
themselves in this. The police have every right
and every obligation to investigate what they think
are crimes. That doesn't mean arrest them for
nothing. That doesn't mean shut them down before
they do so because they're Muslim and because
they're invading. It means investigate.
If you think there's a network of terrorism,
investigate it. That's what they're there for. That's
what and the point is, I have my
issues with the freedom overlaps to this. I
don't think the FBI should exist and so
on. Different point though. It is the way
it currently is. They can investigate for people
that are doing so. And if they can
prove that there's an organized plan to carry
this hack, then you can charge them for
the crimes you can enforce. If not, then
there's nothing to enforce.
It's simple.
You see, there's gonna be people everywhere. I
wanna make this out to be so naive.
And so, these are people that are fighting
against the constitution. So fine. Maybe you even
think I'm that that I'm wrong. Maybe you
think that the constitution
is being used, like I played that clip
to begin with, to allow these things. Okay.
If that's the case,
make your argument.
This is what I keep saying. Make your
argument. Present your evidence and make your argument
for why you think the constitution should be
broken for x, y, and z. See, the
problem is most of these cowards who are
allowing what's happening pretend that what they're doing
is okay, pretend that it is constitutional because
they started it or whatever dumb argument they
make. If you want to argue that we
should do this, I'll listen to you. We
can have a conversation. Maybe I'll even admit
I'm wrong if you can sell me on
it. Find it hard to believe when it
comes to the constitution, but the point is
that people are lying about what they're doing
because they recognize that it is unconstitutional. They
don't wanna admit that.
What does that show you?
Like, I can I can I can acknowledge
the possibility that maybe my view is archaic
or something, and maybe there's like, that's why
and maybe we should have a whole conversation
of another constitutional convention and argue why we
should go a new direction?
You know my opinion on this. My point
is to make your argument and let's go
forward as opposed to pretending like you're in
line with the constitution while you destroy the
constitution.
It's just very, very clear. Enforce the law.
Stand by your principle.
And this moron says, would be easier to
corner and deport them. Where's the government? Right.
How dare they
represent their religion in a public place where
they're a lot I mean, these people are
all disgusting morons, and they're out there fighting
for things that are a counter to this
country's values. Or rather just let's just say,
because that's different, counter to the law and
the constitutional reality of that law.
For example, here's Laura Loomer saying, hopefully, today,
president Trump can negotiate the permanent deportation of
Hauser Piker back to Turkey. It's time for
him to go home,
except he's an American.
Right? That doesn't matter to Laura Loomer. That's
the kind of point we're making as he
says, but I was born here, dumbass.
And you can look it up for yourself,
but that doesn't matter. To her, you're not
American if you don't tow certain very pro
Israel lines. That's the reality.
Even though that kinda seems like Israel as
opposed to America, but, you know, different folks
folks for different folks. But here here is
another example. This was Tom Tom Ho the
Tom Homan borders our news account asking if
we're okay with people expressing their religious beliefs
in a country that professes to believe in
religious freedom. And he takes issue with the
phrase, god is great.
Not a joke. You know
why? Because it's Al Akbar, which literally means
God is great. Now, you could pretend that
means terrorism because you frame it that way.
Like you could pretend intifada means something other
than rebellion.
Right? Like the the American intifada, the American
revolution, that's what it was. It's just a
terrible word. It's exactly what it means. Now
you could yell revolution and go murder a
bunch of people and that's a crime. Right?
Or you could yell revolution and overthrow government
because you have a legal right to, or
however you wanna frame it. The point is
for them to just make these terrorist words
is all about them.
My point though is that they deleted this
now. Why?
You can click it for yourself because it
was ridiculous, and people even the right was
going after them because are you a moron?
Like, I get there's an issue here and
if they think that the point is that
this is legally protected. These are people who
are actively undermining the very constitution they claim
they're fighting for.
Are these clowns still pretending Muslims attack nine
eleven? Wake up. They are, by the way,
including Loomer.
Mehdi Hasan. Laura Loomer, on September 18, literally
said, why do we even have Muslims in
congress?
A stain
on our country.
It's just it's just mind blowing. As Mehdi
Hasan says, this is a top adviser to
the president.
If every top political journalist at the post,
time, CNN, etcetera, isn't covering this and making
a scandal out of this, it's yet another
reminder that they are soft on Trump and
okay with his homophobia, whatever you call it.
I mean, that's literally what it is. But
guys, my God,
it's just if if if anybody came out
and said, why do we have Jews in
Congress to stay in our country? It would
be a waterfall for six months of nonstop
attack on anybody. I mean, you know this.
If it was Christians shouldn't be allowed in
Congress,
why is it okay to say Muslims? Why?
Because you just arbitrarily think every Muslim in
the world is one thing? Yeah. Because you're
a complete moron.
Simple.
I don't even care if it's 99%. It's
if you say it, it's still a false
statement, isn't it?
But the reality is so, so obvious.
Let's not forget, The US and Israel have
been the ones funding the most radical elements
of exactly this problem
for seventy six year. Really more, probably, like,
fifty, sixty years.
And The US before that, quite frankly, if
you understand other topics. The reality though is
that this collaboration
has been the ones funding the most radical
things that they point to as the problem
that they've used to overthrow countries all around
the world. Thank God people are finally starting
to recognize this. Even Hamas, by the way,
since Israel quite literally funded Hamas up until
October 7. And no, that doesn't undermine the
legal act of armed resistance for an occupied
territory.
Megatron points out the man responsible for the
civil unrest at UK is Zionist Tommy Robinson,
who is a Mossad agent. Even though the
killing of the children was carried out by
a person who is not Muslim
nor an illegal immigrant, but a native of
The UK of Rwandan origin,
Tommy Robinson, who was deeply infiltrated among the
conservative population at UK and constantly spreads pro
Israel ideology,
used the movement, the moment, of bitterness
to return the anti immigrant protests into racist
and anti Islamic ones with the top of
social networks. Help. Excuse me.
Again, a a person born in The UK,
but had brown skin. Right? So he turned
it into an attack on immigrants.
Tommy Robinson constantly travels and resides in Tel
Aviv.
After Israel filled The UK with illegal immigrants
and their wars
in The Middle East and North Africa, now
they will also cause a civil war. In
addition to Robinson, the government of Britain, which
is completely Zionist, constantly lies, lets new illegal
immigrants in the country, and it doesn't want
them to stop. All this is organized to
core data. Now that's Megatron's opinion.
But I want you to understand that this
is where you know, outside of like, the
I'm less knowledgeable about the in the
I think that's real. But to the degree
it's happening in The UK, and I what
I can see is the obvious overlaps in
The United States, the border, immigration, and the
fact that we've already caught a a somebody
working for Mossad pretending to be a Palestinian
coming through the border during the height of
the immigration point.
But we don't talk about that though because
we're not allowed to from the Republican side.
The truth is that this is exactly how
this is working and people are finding it
out all over the place.
Creating the very problem they point you to
justify just like funding terrorism and then claim
you're fighting it guys. It's what they're doing.
And again, I've shown you this many times.
Here's Tommy Robinson, pointing posting a video. By
the way, shortcut story. That's a Jewish woman.
Easy to prove from Jewish platforms. That's a
Jewish woman in Israel wearing that black cover
with her child.
And he says, this has no place in
the twenty first century
because this person simply says woman in Islam.
So whether Tommy's too dumb to know he's
wrong or doesn't care, either way, it's easy
to prove from Forward, which is an Israeli
or rather a Jewish platform
that that's a Jewish woman.
It's a photographer, Yabok Lieberman, saw this site
in Beth Shemash, a Jewish woman and her
two daughters, a dark black cloth covering them
head to toes. And it starts by saying,
no, that's not what you think it is.
It's not it's are you not even a
Muslim? It is a Jewish person who wears
okay. Because the point is if you understand
the reality, very similar things also happen in
Israel. Maybe not that extreme degree all the
time, but most ex Orthodox women are forced
to wear head coverings just like a lot
of other places that they criticize.
You see, it's not about the reality of
the information. It's about an agenda that the
radical Zionist government has been pushing for an
entire, you know, seventy plus years.
So two points I wanna make before we
finish on the point of Portland,
and I think these are important.
Now first, the January 6 point that's been
going around. Thomas Massie says, I worked for
years to reveal that agents and assets of
the government participated in, encouraged, and instigated the
protests and every and
I can't talk right now, I'm getting to
the end of the show,
and entry into the Capitol on January 6.
I believe that Garland and Wray may have
perjured themselves. Thank you for your attention. I
agree. Same thing I've been saying the entire
time, under Trump, over under Biden, under anybody,
because principled stances are what it's all about,
not about the partisan side. Now this is
Trump coming out today saying it's been revealed
that there were 274
FBI agents in the crowd. Now I've said
this many times already, and you guys watch
this now.
I don't know why that that's not a
new no. 274?
Yeah. That that the specific specificity of it,
that's new.
But this has been repeated and proven
many times from
naval psychological
offer officer elements
to FBI elements,
two specifically agents that we see. I mean,
this has been this, even I think even
Massey right here asked specifically in Congress.
There's been examples of people that have publicly
admitted that within elements of authority.
So either way, the point is that's not
new information. But that's not the point today.
That's the point I'm making now to say
this, but the point of what I'm bringing
up for today is different.
So I wanna point this out because Thomas
Massie is saying,
here is an example of how the government
manipulated
the right to create a situation where they
were framed as terrorists. Right?
It's exactly
what we've said in all these shows about
this.
It's just the one I'll grab real quick.
And the title,
January 6 was always a very clear government
operation.
All the stuff we've talked about, the the
Azov movement present, the guy from Ukraine, what's
his name? Binion,
Sir Sergei Benin, I think.
He was from the Azov movement. He's Ukrainian.
Part literally on the ground yelling things in
Russian. Go get him. Right? Here's the Antifa
guy that was on the ground literally caught
on video saying, we did it. We got
him. Like, it's lazily obvious that this was
something different than what people are claiming. Now
the point
was that this was an obvious operation. Right?
So we and so here's Massey simply
acknowledging that we know that there were FBI
agents that were there. This was a larger
manipulation. But what the the point is that
this is something we can see of the
of the government creating a construct where the
right can be blamed for the problem, and
that would roll in all the things we're
talking about right now.
So today,
we see the same thing in reverse where
the right is creating the left into that
same problem to roll in all the same
things.
The reality is this happens both ways or
rather, again, not a both sizing of the
issue. It is your government that does this
to all of us regardless of what side
you're on.
Now the last point,
here's Laura Loomer.
And this is well, this is Saeed Mohammed
Mirandi simply pointing out her post where he
says the first sign of a Zionist false
flag operation. Here's Laura Loomer.
Something very big is happening. I have a
very terrible feeling in my gut last month.
I truly believe a massive Islamic terrorist attack
on The US and our electoral grid is
some capacity is coming very soon. It's very
weirdly specific, isn't it? All of the warning
signs are there. Stay locked and loaded.
Gosh. She's such a clown. Well, maybe it's
because the government literally just said,
emergency cybersecurity order after hackers breach at least
one government agency. She's such a manipulator. The
point is either somebody directed her to say
that or she's recognizing that that just got
said and going, for a month now, I've
been thinking the thing that they just said
was about to happen. So she can maybe
project herself as being ahead of the story.
Either way, I think it's bigger than that.
Or rather, it's irrelevant to the point they're
making now. Here she is
saying cyber attack is coming, and we think
it's a bad deal, which they'll immediately blame,
you know, Palestinian protesters, Muslims, anybody bad she
doesn't like without any evidence. That's what they
do.
The government did come out on the twenty
fifth and said, US officials issue emergency cybersecurity
order. Now the point is this this kind
of statement is said, like, every Tuesday.
Kinda joking, but the reality is it's very
common. Many times of the year, they say
that emergency, we get the sense that something
might happen tomorrow and it doesn't happen. But
it's always a setup who might. Like, you
know, the idea is that now that the
air is ready for maybe something to happen,
which they can then blame on a bad
guy because they already who knows?
Usually, the obvious culprit for something like this
is Israel with the infiltration. That's not that
I can prove that, but how much they're
infiltrated. And almost every time it seems to
be a company that they supposedly work for
and they blame her on. And it's like,
well, Israel is the one that, you know,
who cares? My point today, before we finish
with the main point, I mean,
discussion in Portland,
is here she is saying this.
Here's Adam pointing out, she's a hostile foreign
agent. Here she is saying, we're going to
have another nine eleven style terrorist attack before
twenty twenty four election. Get ready for another
nine eleven. It's only a matter of time
before we even have the nine eleven. We
have they're all different posts. We will have
another nine eleven in our country probably within
the next six months to a year. Funny,
it's just like Jones. World War three tomorrow.
World War three. And eventually, we'll be right.
But, you know, or Tim Pool. Civil war.
Civil war. Civil war. He'll eventually arrive.
But the point is whether she's a hostile
agent.
Look, it's I you can't prove what he's
post, right? It's an opinion. Do I think
that she's actively working for a foreigner? I
I do.
What I genuinely do. I think what she's
doing is in the interest of something other
than America.
Now the point though,
do I think
what she's doing
is in the interest of a foreign government
or something outside? Yes. I very much do.
I very much think that.
Now is
she I guess the main point, is she
using her free speech
to try to manipulate us within the law.
Right? Within the law, just underneath it, using
her free speech to to to trick us
into working for Israel. Or maybe there's an
organized network of people like her who are
actively informing them. That's probably what's happening.
But would I still fight to defend her
right to have free speech? Yes. I would.
And that is the point today.
Right? I I genuinely think there's a problem
with what she's doing. And I genuinely think
people like her are quite literally, like, whether
you think it's a coup of this country,
which I'm not even remotely, like, I think
that's likely.
Or if not already happened a while ago
and watching the transition of some technocratic overtake
on top of that, whatever you think about
any of that. I think that. My point
is that do I think she's involved in
that 100%,
but would I still on the side of
fighting for her right to do that or
rather to say things with and and her
words are allowing? Yes.
Because the principle, guys. And so when if
and when somebody breaks the law or otherwise,
arrest them. Charge them, stew process, prevent the
evidence, arrest them.
Now, what's crazy to me is that this
is the problem with people today in the
partisan game, is that they've convinced themselves that
you make a logical argument for why they're
trying to do something boogeyman wrong, even though
we can't prove it, you're okay with your
government breaking the rules to go after the
other side. It's damn near everywhere today. And
so we have to start understanding the importance
of that principle.
And realizing that it like I said before,
let's just say there's an organized network of
evil Muslim terrorists trying to overthrow and take
over every country, every state.
Well, certainly possible, isn't it? First of all,
let's prove these things. Give like, not just
continue to have floating narratives of too many
Palestinian flags and praying in public spaces, but
let's have some proof of some kind of
coordinated network. Then let's have authorities investigate that,
have them go and charge them with crimes
if you think that's possible. Bring them in
front of a jail. Oh my God, it's
crazy, right? Now, if you can do that,
then go after them and charge them for
that crime and put them in jail if
they deserve that. Outside of that,
what else are we talking about?
Why would you then want the government to
be able to broaden this out to go
after anybody they think might fit into that?
Gee, that's never been abused before.
You see my it's just it's obvious where
we need to air on this. So if
you can't understand why it's important to air
on the side of that principle, especially when
we can't prove what they're saying is true,
then I think you've lost the plot. I
think that's exactly where they've driven us to.
So Trump says
he will send troops to Portland,
in Oregon, obviously, in latest development in US
cities.
Now, this is actually really important because I
think this is not just about his own
power grab and the many other things to
discuss, but this is a like a
I'll just put it like the like a
beginning like, VC and many others were kind
of the starting, but this is the beginning
of a new step in this phase.
And I think this is all in the
direction of everything we've discussed today, from the
control over our narratives and the shutting down
of our speech, for all the ways this
overlaps.
Because now you can't say the wrong thing
in certain context because they're gonna call you
a domestic terrorist, just like Biden was doing.
But maybe this time they're gonna act on
it. But, you know, anyway, you you you
get it. Everything we discussed today, I think
these actions, this is one part of a
major development, but it's all leading in that
direction.
So let me let me go through this
as a little bit more. This is from
the article
from today. Donald Trump says, Saturday, he will
send troops to Portland, Oregon, quote, authorizing full
force if necessary
to handle
domestic terrorists
as he expands his controversial deployments to American
cities. Now, remember, there's as of right now,
there's only been DC. He's threatened Chicago, hasn't
happened. He's threatened Memphis, haven't hasn't technically happened,
not the way that we're talking about.
Now, he's threatening Oregon. I get the sense
that Portland is going to be the the
real next step. Personal opinion.
Domestic terrorist. Okay. So domestic terrorist, then why
are we involving ICE in this? Why is
it about ICE locations?
Well, I think that makes the whole point
because it's about you. It's about local. It's
about creating the whole thing was always aimed
at you, like we've been telling you for
years left and right.
He made the announcement on social media writing
that he was directing the Department of Defense
to provide all necessary troops to protect war
ravaged Portland.
War ravaged Portland?
I mean, guys, that's it. That's comically stupid.
That they're they're not
look. There are very many cities that are
way above the list on how many how
much crime, for example.
That just doesn't make any sense unless you
understand what he's trying to insinuate
or basically just nod to
Antifa.
Right? The protest, it where originates from, we
were told.
And that's what he's trying to get at.
The battle for port like, all these historical
sort of, like,
civil rights, you know, protesting moments. That's what
they're pointing at. And it says, Trump said
the decision was necessary to protect US immigration
and the custom enforcement facilities,
which was described as under siege from attack
by Antifa and other domestic terrorists. That's the
one time it gets brought up in this
and that, but he's not aiming this at
them and then what he's doing.
It it is, but it's not specific in
most cases. But so he's saying facilities so
we're deploying military.
Military to protect
buildings.
Do you really think that's what this is
about like you think you couldn't brought in
authorities from the state. This is about something
else.
Portland's mayor, Democrat,
Keith Wilson,
said there was no need for troops in
his city. Quote, our nation has a long
memory of acts of oppression, and the president
will not find lawless or lawlessness or violence
here unless he plans to perpetuate it.
But shouldn't this I mean, yeah. Constitution, states
rights. This is where the line is drawn.
Everything else is unconstitutional,
border extensions expansions of power, national emergency,
insurrection act. These are all things that have
been tacked on that I would argue are
counter to the constitution, but that's gonna be
a hard sell for most people right now.
Either way, states' rights matters. And then and
if you're gonna argue that there's national emergency,
you should damn well prove that. And, of
course, if he says it and it's not
true and doesn't prove it, that's where congress
is supposed to come in and say, you
lied. Impeachment. But they never do that anymore.
And that's where the whole system breaks down.
And I think that's been coordinated into place
by either foreign entity
or the collaboration of these people for the
consolidation of power.
Now, again, he says, under siege by attack
from Antifa and other domestic terrorists. You know,
the they'll don't forget the labeling of Antifa
as domestic terrorists has and, again, there there
are look. Despite what they claim is, like,
there's nothing. It's all there are groups. There
are very clearly, like, organized groups of Antifa
that have, you know,
different things they wear and, like, their list
of people. Like, that exists. But I don't
I agree that I don't think there's some
kind of, like, one central linking thing for
all of it. I do obviously do I
think that, like, from the left kind of
organized element just like we see on the
right, or even even if it's just, like,
Patriot Front, Antifa from, like, the FBI level,
however you look at it, those things are
real. You can quite literally prove that the
infiltration and the use of these groups are
prevalent.
My point though is that there are plenty
of groups that are just groups that wanna
fight against what they see as a problem.
And in many ways, ignorantly act out in
ways that are quite literally fascist.
But the idea that you can just arbitrarily
label every one of these American people as
domestic terrorists because they are part of a
group that you don't like.
It's just mind blowing to me.
And on top of that,
they already made the case, which we'll read
in a second, that if the word fascist
is used, then you're part of the group.
That's what they're doing.
So calling them a fascist while they're being
fascist, they could now you're a terrorist group.
Where's the emergency? Asked resident Alan shirt,
Alan something, 72 years old, who said he
was disgusted by the president's actions.
Another resident, 74 also, called Trump statements ridiculous.
He pointed out that he was taking a
leisurely stroll along the river on a peaceful
sunny day. Now, I I opened multiple restaurants
in Portland
and some just outside of that over a
long while back, and I've lived in Washington
for a while. I mean, I'm very familiar
with the area in general. And, you know,
there's I know some people that still live
out in the area. And as far as
I can tell, there's not some massive overwhelming
problem. But that's the same thing I could
have pointed out in regard to any of
the places they've already gone. Now, specifically,
DC? Yeah. There's a hell of a lot
of crime in DC. But as I proved
to you, it was lower on the list
in the number of even the top 30.
But that didn't stop them from pretending that
was the biggest problem in the world. Claimed
Washington DC was more dangerous than any other
place in the world.
That's how they this that's very Zionist propaganda
of them. Just you couldn't have just said
it's bad enough to act on. You have
to make some crazy lie. That's very what
Stephen Miller does every day. Trump does it
every day.
It says, this place is not a city
that's out of control. It's just a beautiful
place. Trump previously threatened to send the National
Guard into Chicago, but has yet to fall
through. Same thing with Memphis.
Quote, we stand ready to mobilize US military
personnel in support of DHS operations in Portland
at the president's direction.
This was,
Parnell who was the Pentagon spokesperson.
But governor
Tina Kotek, a Democrat, has said there's no
national security threat in Portland. Quote, our communities
are safe and calm. I mean, shouldn't it
matter that they have to prove what they're
saying? I mean, it really should. The Trump
administration sent hundreds of agents, including from the
US border patrol, for the stated purpose of
protecting the federal courthouse
from vandalism.
Okay. So so even if you think that
the primary goal is to get immigrants,
they're pulling people from doing that to protect
buildings from being vandalized.
Over about all people going after immigrants usually
profiling, who were in other cases actually going
after sex trafficking rings and pedophile rings. That's
a very provable case. I've pointed that out
many times.
Seems very counterintuitive for what the whole point
is, but maybe not since we're now pretending
the Epstein files are a hoax.
Recent protests have been far more muted and
focused on the area around the ICE Building.
It says located outside the city,
downtown, that was the heart of the twenty
twenty protest. That that's really the one of
the largest ones they're just kinda pointing back
to as a war ravaged.
The building's main entrance and Ground Floor windows
have been boarded up and are tagged with
graffiti. Yes. And if you think that's the
charge them with a crime.
Do they do they vandalize it? Then arrest
them. But the game you play where you
go, okay, they're all terrorists because they
tag the side of the building, It's just
it's just silly. Now I know that's not
the the real point of what they're claiming,
but that's what they're pointing to in this
case. They're saying that they're attacking the building,
deploy the military to defend against people with
a spray can.
The truth is if people could be charged
with those crimes, they would have already done
it. This is using anything they can to
justify
terrorism,
guys. Terrorism charges. Earlier this month, the city
said it would issue a land use violation
notice to the city's ICE enforcement building because
it had been used to to to use
to detain people overnight for more than twelve
hours, which by the way is a violation
of its conditional land use approval. But that
doesn't matter. See, the law doesn't apply to
us, which from Trump's perspective.
Which the point is, they keep doing this
in many of these locations. They're holding people
for well beyond what they're supposed to. That's
a crime. And so from the state's perspective,
they can choose to act. Look. I get
it that these governors have a political motivation,
and maybe they don't act on places they
should. It doesn't change the fact that that
is still a problem and should be acted
upon. So just because you go, but they
don't act anywhere else, doesn't change anything. They're
all doing that. Trump is doing that. So
the point is, that is still a thing,
and you should care about that thing. Even
though they don't enforce everything everywhere else, it's
frustrating.
This is we're going to get out there
and we're going to do a pretty big
number on those people in Portland, Trump said.
I don't know. It just is so over
the top for me, and I think, guy,
this is obviously going in a very, very
bad direction. So, again, here's
ponding today. Under president Trump's leadership, there is
zero tolerance
for political violence and domestic terrorism. You know,
of course, unless it's Israeli, unless it's one
of your people on your team, unless and
less and less, you know, just like the
same on the other side. I am deploying
federal agents to ICE facilities
around the country.
If you so much as touch one of
our officers, you'll go to prison.
Even right there, Bonnie just being Bondy. Even
though touching somebody is not a crime. Even
though touching somebody, even if you think it's
done in some kind of weird manipulative way,
it's still not worthy of sending someone to
prison, but they'll do it. They just she
the guy just suplexed a woman for pleading
with him on his on his elbow.
Do you I mean, do you realize just
because you think that's funny, you'd like seeing
Democrats threatened, doesn't make that justifiable.
And she's not lying about that. They've already
done this, guys. They've already shown you how
far they're willing to go for people that
Kia Tesla, for example.
Remember that? Funny how long we go from
there. Well, I said, why ICE facilities for
what they call domestic terrorism?
Think about it.
Why is this even overlapping?
Because we wanna defend them from graffiti. Are
we really thinking that would make sense?
Essentially proving to me that the deployment device,
which is what I've been saying the entire
time, and military all around the country, was
not really about immigration,
but simply the new normal.
I know we can see this if we're
being honest with ourselves.
Gen X girl says this is not good.
Anyone, anything is labeled terrorism now, which again,
I'm gonna make it's it's not it's it's
important to keep making the point, is identical
to what we saw from Biden.
It's the Patriot Act on steroids and the
use of our military on on the homeland.
While it's while it may seem like a
good idea, 2028
is not that far away. Once this becomes
acceptable, the other side will use it on
you. It's Amazing how we can't think of
that point. And the truth is the John
Jones and all you know, people like that,
they know this. They're just trying to get
you in the spot you need to be
in so the power structure is gonna abuse
you. And they can claim foul and pretend
they you you know, whatever they do to
keep their game going. The truth is that
this is obvious.
Anybody with a brain can recognize that the
powers they're allowing now will be used against
by the other side. Yep. As always. And
that's part of the game.
Stephen Miller comes out and says, we're witnessing
domestic terrorists'
sedition against the federal government.
He just keeps pushing that bond. So okay.
So if you're claiming sedition, you don't make
a claim like that with nothing. This is
why this is why lawyers out there are
making fun of this guy every day. You
can't you're if you're accusing somebody now he's
not making it specific right there, but he
does often. Right?
What Obama and Comey and other traders and
and so okay. So those are very serious
claims.
If you're making that claim, especially with somebody's
position that he's holding,
then somebody could sue you for libel. The
reason they don't, I think, is because they're
all playing this game. But overall,
you're trying to convince people that they're domestic
terrorists, and then you do nothing about it.
Who have you arrested, Miller? Who's in jail?
Is there any Democrats you've arrested? How how
when's that gonna happen?
But he'll sit there with his lazy sociopathic
eyes and tell you that everyone's going to
jail. It's all coming down. Just like Jones
does. It has for years.
But he says
against the government. So it's not just
lefties doing things that we argue are terrorism.
No. No. No. This is an organized
sedition.
You know, sort of like when they claimed
you guys were
insurrectioning the government, you know, overthrowing the government.
Can you not just stand back and look
at how the government plays these games and
stop listening to idiots like Stephen Miller who
just are leading you the pipe pipering you
right into your own destruction?
He says the JTTF, which I'll show you
now, has been dispatched by the attorney general
pursuant
to the NSPM
seven, which I'll show you as well. Same
same document. All necessary resources will be utilized.
Or not same document. It's the,
the
national security presidential memorandum seven
and the what was it again? The j,
I looked it up earlier. I'm not forgetting.
Damn it. What was that again? Anyway, this
is the document.
Sorry. I'm trying to remember. It drives me
crazy.
What What was that again? Now, anyway, the
point what he's simply saying clearly is
that they've dispatched this pursuant
to this document, which is the national securities
presidential memorandum
number seven. And this is
about
countering domestic terrorism and organized political violence.
Now we haven't realized that this so he's
he's saying action's been taken based on this.
You have the president of the country writing
the executive order of the twenty fifth and
then just casting law
because that's apparently the way our country operates.
And I've been saying that for many administrations
now. It's rule by executive order. They all
act like they're critical of it when the
other side does it, and they all do
the same thing. It's the same like everything
else. You're a terrorist. No. You're a terrorist.
And they both do the same thing. So
they're building and building and building. They're both
adding to their power as they go forward.
Here's what some of these important parts say.
This political violence
is not a series of isolated incidents and
does not emerge organically.
Instead, it is a culmination of sophisticated,
organized campaigns of targeted intimidation,
radicalization threats, and violent design to silence opposing
speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy
policy outcomes, and prevent the functions of democracy
and time. Okay. Every single thing you just
listed off. First of all, have they proven
any of this?
Are you able to lay out a provable
case that a judge could accept and charge
somebody with of an organized campaign? Now am
I saying it's not happening? No. I'm not.
My point is, I don't think either side
is it behooves them to prove the way
that they both manipulate all of us.
So, what you're gonna get is the broad
claim of this, but then they then apply
to individual cases.
Just like it's been happening back and forth
for a long time. Coming after social media
like myself, going after individuals protesting on the
ground, that's what it'll be. But never will
it be getting the real what they claim
they're actually aiming at, which is the larger
organized infrastructure. Because if you look, that's the
government.
Right? That's what we're talking about.
A new law enforcement strategy that investigates all
participants in these criminal and terrorist there you
go. Now,
they're pretending. They're going the big picture, but
we're gonna start focusing on the individuals acting
for the whole team. Oh, so it's not
a big organized focal point. It's about the
individual,
including the organized structures, networks, entities, organizations, funding
sources.
We'll see.
I think it's pretty clear the way they're
framing this is about this is gonna be
about people protesting. This is gonna be about
people out there deciding to try to you
know, call out an ICE agent who's doing
the wrong thing. That's I I watch.
These campaigns often begin by isolating and dehumanizing
specific targets to justify murder or other violent
actions against them.
It's like they're literally listing off what both
sides will do, what Israel's doing every single
day.
Silencing speech?
Really?
Guys, it's what's constantly happening more than I've
ever seen in my entire life right now.
Using this pattern,
Oh, and then it says, you know, radicalization
and violent intimidation.
You're a terrorist. I mean, literally calling all
of them a terrorist organization seems to be
a little bit over you know, like, pretty
much on the nose.
Uniting this pattern of violent and terroristic activities
under the umbrella of self described
anti fascism.
Oh, okay. So it's literally only about one
side. Even though
even though that's never listed in here. I
said that when they first they made very
careful point to not say the left even
though every other point over the last six
months has been left, left, left, anti left,
left, terrorist left, radical left, lunatic left.
Now they passed the bill aimed at that,
and they weirdly don't make that point.
It's just it's almost class it's almost comical.
But anti fascism. Okay. Now even if there's
clear points where people can be anti fascist
on any political side, they mean the left
when they say that. These movements portray foundational
American principles,
support for law enforcement and border control as
fascist.
No. No. What they're saying is that you
guys with your fascist police enforcement
are being fascist. And then you go, you
hate police.
Nobody. That's not what I said. But, see,
some of them do, but you love to
conflate Americans with the one thing you don't
like. You point at the one guy with
the Nazi sign and go, you're all Nazis.
Oh, remember that? The right trucker convoy? We
don't like to talk about those things now
because it makes us uncomfortable to recognize
all sides do it
or just recognize that it's dumb to do
it in general because it's hyperbolic and it's
not what everybody represents. But the left are
all something. Right?
Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti
Americanism.
Oh, interesting. Anti capitalism.
Doesn't this sound familiar?
Yeah. Because it's
identical to what Biden wrote in his one,
in his,
document,
which
there it is,
which by the way, they deleted. It is
no longer there.
Now ask yourself at what point that started
to happen. At what point did the White
House or the government start deleting documents that
were that's not how that's supposed to work,
guys. I'm pretty sure there's a law about
the you know, how much you wanna bet,
though, all they did was move it to
some other server somewhere that nobody knows is
there. They go, oh, it's all there. We
just, you know, like a link somewhere that
nobody has public.
That's the kind of games they play today.
The reality though is this is something that
was document this was a government action and
document outlining action. And whether or not you
shifted,
that's not supposed to be deleted. That's supposed
to be something that we can reference.
But you see, we live in a technocratic
dystopian world right now where they are actively
shoring these things up. Point is that, I
honestly think why they deleted it is because
it's just like identical to what Trump's doing.
With a few different flavors, but it's the
same thing in outcome, in principle.
So anti Americanism, anti capitalism.
I mean, even that I can just show
you real quick.
Violently oppose all forms of capitalism.
Oh, funny. It's almost like they're doing the
same thing.
And it says,
anti Christianity. That's the that one's that was
added. That wasn't the other one.
Support for overthrow of the United States government.
Extremism on migration, race, gender. Really?
I mean, seriously, like, this is what's so
funny. Like, there's many points in this that
quite literally show you that it's gonna be
aimed at everybody.
Oh, shocking. That's exactly what name of the
brain has been telling you for a long
time.
So your extremism on race? Well, let's okay.
Let's just even say that Trump doesn't do
anything. Well, here comes Biden or here comes
whoever. You know, I know you all wanna
pretend like you know for sure what's gonna
be Vance.
How much you wanna bet? It doesn't happen
that way because it always kinda teeter totters
back and forth. No, yeah, sometimes it's consecutive
years, but either way, I think right now
because of how fast it's happening, I'm I'm
already I already said this before. Like, I
thought Trump was gonna be in power, but
a lot of people did. I'm willing to
bet you. I don't know who exactly yet,
but I'm pretty sure it's gonna be a
Democrat because that's the way the game goes.
Either way,
they will use that to go after you
for exactly the same reason and ignore happening
on their side. It's this game that plays
back and forth. But right now,
I'm where I get the sense that maybe
that'll happen differently this time, that maybe it'll
be everybody,
that you'll be gone after to make a
point, thinking that you're doing this to go
after the left. Right? Donkey on the left
becomes now you're in a gulag. Right? Now
you're in the technocratic prison because you thought
you were donkey on the left.
Hostility towards those who hold traditional American views
on family, religion, more doubt morality. Right? I
mean, it's very clear that most of this
is meant to be, like, sentiments that they
will think is only about the left.
Designating Antifa
says, for example, Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin engraved
the bullets with anti fascist rhetoric.
Oh, did
he? The idea is clearly these were from
that game, by the way. But who cares
about the way you can clearly prove that's
what it comes from?
Saying something is fascist does not make you
anything other than a point.
An honest person today.
What these governments are doing is by definition,
fascistic, but doesn't matter.
Now it says invested in domestic terrorism organizations.
The joint oh, that's what it was. That's
what it was. Okay. Now I remember. I
was I this is gonna kill me. I
figured the joint
terrorism task force. That's what it was. So
what he Steven Miller is saying, the joint
terrorism task force has been dispatched, which we
already reported,
pursuant to this new document.
Right. Because that makes sense. They can just
I mean, why even sign a piece of
paper anymore? Why don't you just say I
get to do it because I'm in charge,
which is basically what they're doing.
Stamp a document. I can do whatever I
want. That's what Trump thinks
today. But it says,
is local it says the joint terrorism task
force and its local offices
shall coordinate and and supervise a comprehensive national
strategy to investigate, prosecute, disrupt entities, and individuals
engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation
designed to suppress lawful political activity and to
script law through a law. Okay. So now
if you are accused
of somehow obstructing their their what they're trying
to do, even if it's illegal, you're a
domestic terrorist. That's how simple this becomes.
And if the national strategy, like, if you
can't realize, this is not going away. This
is not some momentary go off to the
left. This is your forever new police state,
Like a lot of us have been telling
you. But, you know, a nice special technocratic
version with Palantir labeling, but it's the same
thing.
It will be used against all of us
as the design has been built.
And you're ushering in your own subjugation if
you can't pay attention.
Nongovernmental
organizations and American citizens residing abroad or with
close ties to foreign governments. Oh my god.
Really? You mean, like, everyone in congress right
now? Agents, citizens, foundations, or influence networks engaged
in violations of the four agents registration act.
They realize how crazy this is? They're doing
this to make a point.
This is aimed at I mean, who's to
say at this point? I mean, because I
I think what it's supposed to mean to
the right
is Iran and Qatar, I guess, is what
they'd love to talk about right now.
It's obviously, if you're gonna be objective, this
is more than anything about Israel's infiltration in
this country. But you think that's what they're
talking about? No.
But that's what some of them might want
to think. All these cute people are gonna
go, oh, we knew it. Save Israel for
last, because they'll believe anything.
Or money laundering by funding, creating, or supporting
entities that engage in activities that support. This
is interesting. Domestic terrorism.
So now because you've deemed
whatever you wanna call this, and not just
Antifa anymore. This new one means you are
obstructing our actions. You're a domestic terrorist. So
now you claim what you did as domestic
terrorism. And now we're gonna say whatever group
you're connected to is, by definition, is domestic
terrorism. And now we're gonna say whatever funding
and activities you've done is now supporting domestic
terrorism. So therefore,
I mean, this is how insane this gets
when you label something arbitrarily as serious as
domestic terrorism.
The attorney general shall issue specific guidance that
ensures domestic terrorism priorities include politically motivated terrorist
acts, such as organized doxing campaigns.
Are you kidding me? I mean, it's just
by the way, would you guys have Charlie
Kirk's murderers, anyone?
Doxing people's addresses in their home? They removed
it because they got called out. Loomer doxes
like it's every like it's her birthday.
The point is that this is something happening
everywhere,
and you're calling it domestic doxing in some
cases is very much a crime. The bottom
line is that this is they're calling it
domestic terrorism,
politically motivated terrorist acts. So the same thing
about this is it's
like this is hate speech.
Politically motivated, that's hate speech.
There's a crime and there's not. Making it
about being politically motivated is just another label
to extend it out and broaden it out
and create a construct that can be used.
That's everything they're doing.
Or to make it extra severe because we
think you did it for this reason. Because,
look, he's got a Palestinian flag on his
hat. That's what we're talking about. Even if
it actually is politically motivated, why does that
change the severity of the crime? The crime
is the crime. Charge them for the crime.
Every moment we give them this leeway, this
gets worse and worse. So when we know
that hate speech is not real and they
go after words because, you know, they say
you did it because you hate this person.
That doesn't change the crime. Now you can
start saying you say words are hate speech,
now they're hate crimes.
Political violence
is hate speech. There is no such thing
as political violence. There's just violence. That's the
point.
Now watch as that gets repeated by people
in certain circles that claim that's
that's something that we should remember.
This guidance should also include the identification of
any behaviors, fact patterns, recurrent motions. Oh, I
hold on. I missed these. It says, doxing,
swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault, destruction of property,
threats of violence, civil disorder.
Do you not realize they just literally frame
civil disorder as domestic terrorism?
Shall pass specific guidance that ensures
domestic terrorism priorities include
and lists off a bunch of things. The
last one is civil disorder.
So somebody sitting in the streets now, a
domestic terrorist,
somebody who protests legally in other ways that
you say is in the way, like, at
a at a college is a domestic terror.
Yes.
That's not my word. That's what she just
wrote
or Trump just wrote.
That's
insane, guys. That's absolutely
shockingly insane.
Let alone
trespass,
assault,
looting. These are not terrorist acts, guys. They're
terrorist acts. Why? Because it's politically motivated.
Doesn't exist.
The secretary oh, wait. Then finish the last
part. It says, this guidance shall also include
an identification
of behaviors,
patterns, see something, say something, guys, recurrent motivations,
or other indicia how do you say that?
Indikia,
common to, you know, examples common to organizations
and entities that coordinate these acts in order
to direct efforts to identify and prevent potential
violent activity.
Great.
So now, you're gonna have people tattling other
neighbors because they,
you know, have a certain flag, say a
certain thing,
protest in a certain way. Yeah. That's where
this is going. They want you to turn
on your family. They want you to turn
on each other instead of recognizing that they're
the problem.
The security the secretary of treasury,
very, very, very much a very proud Zionist,
in coordination with the attorney general, goes as
well,
shall make available all resources to the maximum
extent permitted by law to identify and disrupt
financial networks
and fund that fund domestic terrorism
and political violence.
So what they mean is what so that's
the best an example of domestic terrorism per
the document is civil disorder. Okay. And this
is taking it verbatim, guys. So civil disorder,
whatever you wanna that that very bland thing
is now being now, okay. So you protest
in a way they think is getting in
the way of people trying to do certain
things. Okay. You're being civil you're being charged
with civil civil,
misconduct? What's the charge actually? Civil disorderly. Okay.
That's what that would be. That's the actual
that's an actual charge.
So you get, I guess, what? Get given
a ticket?
Domestic terrorism.
And then anything you funded or connected to
are also now
identifiable networks of funding.
Now look. Are there things like this that
exist? Absolutely. Do you think that's what's gonna
happen? I don't.
I think it's gonna be making a case
that argues this. Like, this is a broad
undefinable
accusation that will be applied to anybody
on the left, which the right will happily
lap up.
The ones, anyway, that don't have any principles,
which are far too many of them at
the top.
Department of Justice designation. In the course of
and as a result of the investigations directed
by section two, we just read up there,
of this memorandum, the attorney general may recommend
that at any group
or entity whose members are engaged in activities
meeting the definitions of domestic terrorism, so civil
disorder being one of them, looting,
vandalism, all listed up there. Okay.
Merits designation
as a domestic terrorist organization. So it's a
self fulfilling prophecy, you see. So you do
a thing like the civil disorder,
you get you now you get charged for
domestic terrorism, but then you get labeled as
an organization. See? And then, therefore, now your
organization can have funding that we can go
after. And then we go after any other
person you're connected to. Even if it's some
little, you know, GoFundMe group that you started
to help to help Democrats or whatever it
is. It's absolutely
mind blowing what they're doing right now.
And I don't even know how this could
ever hold up in court, but it doesn't
seem like they care about that.
Let me read that again.
In the course of your investigations directed by
what we listed above, that may they they
may recommend
any group or entity whose members are engaged
in activities meeting the definition of domestic terrorism,
Looting, trespass, destruction of property, threats, civil disoriety,
swatting, right, like, things that don't even come
close to domestic terrorism, like Laura Loomer doxing
online or looting a place or civil disorder,
which is the most important because it's very
benign.
It can be something more, but it means
as simple as being arrested because you're just
you know, civil disorderly is not complying with
the police officer, things like that. Okay.
Those
meeting any definition
merits designation as a terrorist organization.
The attorney general shall submit a list of
any such groups or entities to the president
through the assistant to the president and homeland
security adviser,
all of which are blindly supporting of all
of this.
Attorney general and the secretary of homeland security
shall designate terrorist
domestic terrorism
a national priority. Yeah. Just like it's been
for many administrations. Nothing new.
This should be alarming.
It is alarming.
Full force if necessary.
So you're protesting a woman just like this
in so in a way, by the way,
which would be legally protected, that they call
you and they arrest people every day for
legally protesting and say you're being civil disordered,
well, now you're a terrorist organization. Should they
want to? Now I look. I'm not the
one arguing that is should should hold up.
It's just it's a freaking executive order. I
mean, seriously, it's so wildly out of bounds.
My point is they don't seem to care,
which is all more to the point, isn't
it?
But here's, as usual, JD Vance putting the
fine point on it,
saying
people will go to jail for funding left
wing terrorism,
which we just told what they just showed
you means as benign as civil disorder or
being in the wrong place at the wrong
time or being associated with the wrong person
in the wrong place,
but they're gonna go to jail for our
ideas of what we you know, it's
too much.
Now I really recommend you read this again.
Who is a terrorist in Biden's America?
You could put Trump's name right there, and
it would read identical to what's happening today.
Damn near anyway.
So here is the document again
for Biden's
domestic terrorism strategy.
I recommend you take time to read this
through.
For those that are honest,
who may just be misguided because of political,
you know, team sport politics out there, read
this.
And you tell me this does not read
identical to what we're dealing with today in
principle, in action, in outcome,
100%.
Another key component of the threat comes from
anti government or anti authority violent extremists.
This significant which, by the way, means whatever
they want it to mean. This is my
point about the left coming out with a
very alarming broad problem,
all encompassing.
The right comes in with a specific, far
more extreme version of the same thing in
principle, and they both work together to complete
the problem.
This significant component of the of today's threat
includes and by the way, when I say
that, I just mean what I'm seeing over
the last so many administrations. These things change.
Right now, that keeps happening over and over,
and you can prove that.
But it says the significant component of today's
threat includes self proclaimed militias. See, this is
more aimed at the right in this conversation,
but it's the same kind of thing about
the the the groups. Right? So now we're
talking about protesting groups that are pushing back,
not to say that there's not obvious manipulation
of Antifa, but, yes, there are also just
people that protest. If you can't acknowledge that,
then you're a child.
And it says, and militia violent extremists who
take steps to violently resist government authority, which
by the way is legally protected by the
constitution, but who cares, Or facilitate the overthrow
of the US government based on perceived overreach.
At least so seriously, guys, you understand that
in the constitution, it quite literally says it
is the people's right to alter or abolish
the government if it is not acting in
its interests.
Now, yes, that's
people pretend like that's crazy, but it's it's
no different than saying you have right to
second amendment
for free speech. It's literally enshrining the constitution.
And the point was, it's always been the
people's power because the government is supposed to
be under your control.
The constitution was to control their power, not
your actions.
So here, the point is you're claiming
if you thought you had the right because
of perceived overreach to change the government, you
are now considered a terrorist. So what's the
difference of claiming these people over here see
fascism and want to act to change the
government? It's the identical outcome. And it says,
anarchist, violent extremist.
Didn't Trump just say the exact same thing
even though they both misrepresent what anarchism actually
is? Who violently oppose all forms of capitalism.
We just read that. Corporate globalization and governing
institutions,
which they perceive as harmful to society. Sovereign
citizen, violent extremists who believe they are immune
from government authority or laws.
Individual or groups who engage in violence or
incite
imminent violence. You see, all the rest of
the buzzwords and and and kind of lent
partisan narratives,
the actual act the actionable terms, the thing
they use in this that will be used
to actually go out are all the same.
You said something that caused that violence. You're
a terrorist. In a position
in opposition to legislative, regulatory, or other actions
taken by the government. That's identical. That's exactly
what's happening today, whether justified or not.
Other domestic terrorists may be motivated by violent
to violence by a single issue idea,
ideologies related to abortion. See, right here, you
can just fill in the other buzzwords for
the right by, you know, related to this
one, this one, this one. And then then
the left, it's abortion, animal rights, environment. So
it's a point is people acting based on
their political views. That's exactly what's happening right
now.
Or involuntary, celibate, violent extremist, as well as
other grievances. See? Just anything else you wanna
fill it in with, and we'll switch that
based on the sign. Or a combination of
ideological influences. In some cases, individuals may develop
their own idiosyncratic
justifications for violence that defy. Right. So if
you can't fit into this category, it applies
anyway. Oh, that's really great.
Absolutely mind blowing.
Just one couple last points on this. Talking
about doxxing. Right? They just told you doxxing
is terrorism.
Here, dirty politics at its worst.
MAGA government candidate
governor candidate under fire for doxing democrat foe.
Look. You can read this. It's very transparent.
It's not hard to recognize. They do it
all the time. Both sides actively do this.
The point is that you're literally putting out
a document that says if you dox people,
you're a domestic terrorist, and then you one
of your own people goes out and does
that. You know, it's just it's just kinda
sad when you recognize how we how I
mean,
how this is designed to trap you.
Now last few points, I just wanna highlight
some comments.
I put this out. Trump says you'll send
troops to Portland, Oregon to hand a domestic
terrorist. Is that what winning looks like? I
asked.
Sure feels like martial law to me.
Jonathan Gibson says, try living here or grow
up watching my primo tiny city become human
decay and debris hub. Now, whether that's even
what's actually happening or not is very you
know, point is people lie about this online
for clear agendas, bots, Israeli manipulators,
republican liars.
But I do think there's problems in the
in the state. I've
I've lived in Washington. Like I said, I
opened restaurants in Portland. I think more than
one in Portland and a couple outside of
the area.
Very familiar with the area, especially living close
to it in general. I went there many,
many times, stayed there many times.
Not to say that I know exactly what's
happening today, right? Other than the fact that
I can look into the information and educate
myself. I went back and forth with somebody
earlier I was laughing at who literally made
the case about you've never been.
And I laughed at him because I was
like, you're the you are the left you
think you're making fun of. You're I mean,
can you not look back and see how
you laughed at that guy? Here you are
saying, you can't speak about Portland because you're
not there. That's what he was trying to
tell me. But this guy says city budget,
700,000 a year for every homeless person we
still look, I'm not saying there's not obvious
government manipulation from the left. 100%.
Call it out. If there's a crime,
get something going, charge them with that crime,
investigate, put them in jail if it's necessary.
Now, I yes. You could argue, for example,
that maybe the entire state government's corrupt. I
probably agree with that. You could easily find
a legal avenue if the president cared from
the FBI to go after people that are
doing that. People will argue it's weaponized. You
know, you can go you can prove that
to present your evidence. Go to court. Break
it out. See, none of that's happening today,
guys. It's all about immediate action without real
process because if they do that, then you
start to realize that process works and we
can actually have evidence we can discuss and
decide. And powerful people can't really just maneuver
all the time.
They still will and they can, but it's
much more difficult when there's and then we
are ad ardently adhere it to a process.
When we on principles,
care about integrity and honor. Right?
But my point was simply this.
Well, so he's basically saying, but she I
live here and it's bad. Okay. What are
we talking about? An unconstitutional
action. That's what we're talking about.
So it doesn't matter what you think and
feel about how bad it is unless you're
arguing the constitution shouldn't matter. But that's not
what he's arguing. I said, well, then let's
our our let's ignore the constitution as it
clearly states. Shall not be infringed unless Jonathan
Gibson feels otherwise.
Not like governments can't create circumstances to get
us to call for our own subjugation. Right?
Because that's never happened before. Right?
I mean, we just have to think this
through. Like, I get there are problems, but
governments will use your problems to draw to
to rationalize
another problem.
COVID nineteen.
This person says, how much anarchy are you
willing to accept?
And how much authoritarianism
are you willing to accept? It's a good
question other than the misframing of anarchy. So
I said, if you mean chaos,
which is not what anarchy means, it means
no rulers, not no rules. What's funny is
always it's perfect to recognize that the only
ideology that exists that I can see that
has no place for rulers is the one
they want you to think is chaos, of
course. But
I said, if you mean chaos,
that's for the individual to decide.
Right?
If one breaks the law,
charge them.
Simple.
Anything else is government overreach.
As for authoritarianism,
zero.
See how simple that is? It really is
that simple. Now, there are very clearly things
people will try to abuse. I mean, people
may even get away with crime, but it's
as simple as it gets.
Anything else is creating an opening for the
government to go, well, we'll broaden this out
because, well, there
there we see it building and we just
don't know how to stop it. Right? Well,
let's remove the constitutional barrier and go after
them anyway.
That's what's happening.
And I agree with Vic Blankenship. Nothing says
land of the free like armed soldiers patrolling
the streets.
Time to wake up, guys. Now
this person, I had a good conversation with.
I was talking about earlier.
I disagree
aggressively with
the the argument that martial law might be
justified or necessary.
But at least the person has a principled
stance and agree and and says, like, look.
I, yeah, I get it that you know,
like, you can read it for yourself. The
point is that just because people can disagree
even that seriously, like, diametric opposites. My point
is I'm not gonna,
like, belittle somebody just because they don't have
my opinion.
See, point is if somebody wants to come
out and say martial law should happen and
makes a case for why they think that
makes sense, but acknowledges that, yes, that that
can you know, that's a constitutional issue, but
I think it should happen. I'll be like,
woah, that's a fair argument. I disagree. I'll
tell you why. But I respect your argument
because you made a case and you put
out your evidence. Nobody seems to do that
anymore. So, this is what the this is
a conversation. He's I I asked, it seems
like martial law. He said, yes. I want
America safe from domestic terrorists, such as Antifa.
Martial law might have to be implemented.
Now, you know my opinion. I think they're
using this and I think Antifa is not
a terrorist organization, not in the sense they
mean it. And that the argument is you're
using that to frame a lot you're you're
creating an abstract large illusion like the war
on terror, but at home, and simply saying
we have to stop them. So, we have
to suspend the constitution to do it even
though they constructed the whole thing, as opposed
to just charging people who commit crimes with
crimes.
Right?
Okay. So, all I said was bought or
not. And I don't mean to insult the
person. My point is I don't who knows
these days? And we know that exists. This
is what's being promulgated within the Republican base.
Very much so. I said, can you imagine
what they'd say if Biden or Obama did
this?
Even if also aimed at Antifa. Right? Even
if he actually meant that and was like,
Antifa is a problem. I see it. Let's
go after them, but I need to clear
martial law to do it. Let's say Obama
said that. Can you imagine what they would
have said at that time? These people are
revealing they either do not care about the
foundation of this nation
or they have no principles.
Now he responded by saying, what, well, this
was the where was it?
Oh, was it why is it with the
kind of a bot? He said if Biden
cracked down on a Tifa, I would have
cheered him on big time.
If Biden had cracked down on illegal immigration,
I would have cheered him on. By the
way, Trump, let BML and Tifa burn down
buildings and kill police, and I was pissed.
Right? So I'm I said, okay. I didn't
say that that, he was a botter. I
said I said that he's bought bought or
not. This is happening. My point was that
the idea is being pushed, and we all
should know by now that bots are con
constant, hence the statement. My point was clear
clearly about, you know, playing teams for politics
if you aren't
outstanding.
This is fair enough, but to be clear,
I hate all politicians equally. I just want
the white genocide to stop. We agree with
that or not. My point is that this
person has a stance and is willing to
articulate it and even willing to argue that,
you know, the other side did it too.
I just don't you don't have to agree
with what he's saying. But you get my
point. Right? As opposed to coming out and
just playing weird political lie games, he at
least has a stance that you wanna stand
by. I disagree. But we can have a
conversation about the difference of that and and
present our points. And there's more to it.
We go on and talk about it. Thank
you. I I do respect anyone consistent their
principles, even if I disagree.
Very important to think about, guys. But the
core point is this.
People are being convinced
that martial law is necessary because bad guys.
If you can't recognize that this is the
same argument happening in foreign policy, that we
need to who cares about for congress declaring
war? Who cares about international law? Who cares
about whatever we say next? Terrorism.
It's the same they've been trying to build
the same momentum in this country now, and
it's happening more than I've ever seen today.
Now the argument is Antifa bad, so the
only way we can stop it, martial
law. The no. Somebody honest will say, yes.
Constitution's a problem, but I think the problem
is worth it, which is kinda where this
guy is going. Now see, my whole point
is that's
it's alarmingly, I think, wrong.
But if you wanted to make a genuine
argument for why that might be the case
we need to make, then do so. Be
honest about it so we can actually have
a dialogue about where we are. So many
of these liars out there are trying to
convince you that this is not only okay,
but, like, within the constitution somehow. Or at
the very least that it's, you know, there's
clearly misinformation around it.
We are at a point now
where again, the core point to end with,
that we have to air, in my opinion,
do whatever you want, but I'm pleading with
you to think about this Side air on
the side of your principles.
If somebody breaks the law, Antifa, anybody else,
charge them with a crime. To create some
game of political violence and make it worse
because you think they have a certain intention
even if they do, is the bastardization of
the of the of the law.
And and they'll guaranteed, like we've seen throughout
history, your government will use that, will abuse
that, and stretch it out.
If a mouse a cookie, he wants a
glass of milk. Right? Every it's just every
single it's it's like a child story that
always holds true, and that is where we
are.
If we allow them to do this, it'll
get out of control. It already is getting
out of control. And I think right now,
more than anybody, the people who need to
stand up and do something about it are
the conservatives who care about the constitution, who
recognize this is the wrong path even if
you think it's for the right reasons and
take a principled stance. You will find you
have more support than you could possibly realize.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys. I
hope this resonates with people because I re
I genuinely feel it's just just about the
most important thing in this country right now.
Hopefully, we can stand up and make a
statement.
Thank you for tuning in.
I'll see
you tomorrow.
I love you all as always.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.