They also feel like they're watching way too
many people fall into unhinged, polarized hysteria. One
way to understand what's happening right now comes
from a book that inspired America's top propagandist,
Edward Bernays, who helped engineer public support for
things like World War one, helped promote and
sanitize this CIA coup in Guatemala, and spoke
openly about the conscious and intelligent manipulation of
the masses. The Crowd, written in 1895 by
Gustave Le Bon, discusses how leaders implant beliefs
and sentiments into collective groups. In this case,
the American left and right, which are both
absolutely losing it in different ways after the
Kirk assassination as each faction fixates on this
country's evils. But the roots of these reactions
go back to long before he was shot.
Le Bon named three main steps to stir
up a crowd that require previous preparation. The
first step in controlling a crowd is affirmations.
Laban said that to influence a crowd, the
rhetoric must be simple and clear. Some examples
of affirmations about America's worst threats right now
are Right wing extremism. Democracy is at risk.
Fascism. For the left wing and Radical left.
Democrats hate America. Leftist lunatics. For the right
wing. But Le Bon said affirmation alone is
not enough. Repetition is key. Nazi propaganda minister
Joseph Goebbels agreed, saying propaganda had to be
simple and repetitious.
Right wing extremism.
Right wing extremism. Right wing extremism.
Democracy is at risk. Democracy is at risk.
Democracy is at risk. Fascist. Fascism.
Radical left. Radical far left. Radical left. Democrats
hate America. They hate our country. They hate
America. Far left lunatic. Leftist lunatics. Is that
a radical left lunatic? A current of opinion
is formed, and the powerful mechanism of contagion
intervenes. Ideas, sentiments, emotions, and beliefs are all
contagious in crowds. A panic that has seized
a few sheep will soon extend to the
whole flock. The contagion of polarizing beliefs has
been spreading for years, but Kirk's killing has
unleashed a fresh wave of all the crowd's
simmering outrage, disdain, divisiveness, and fear. When Kirk
was killed, it wasn't just that single event
that whipped so many people into a frenzy,
but the activation of years and decades of
high stakes hyper emotional programming and all the
imagery that's come with it. And it happens
for far more things than his assassination. I'm
not saying the entire Kirk horror story has
been intentionally engineered. But people's ideas, behaviors, and
feelings are boiling over right in line with
all the narratives they've been eating up for
years and ruling authorities are milking it for
all it's worth. But Bernays quote about World
War one applies to so much more. The
manipulators of patriotic opinion made use of the
mental cliches and the emotional habits of the
public to produce mass reactions against the alleged
atrocities, the terror, and the tyranny of the
enemy. Add in the never ending news cycle,
social media addiction, and all the chronic stress
and fight or flight overload. Then add in
a never ending stream of partisan divide and
conquer propaganda that keeps people fighting each other
and blind to the realities of the authoritarian
uni party dystopia? And is it any wonder
the masses are falling into what appears to
be collective mania?
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Help your own people. Help your own people.
They have to stay in joy.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 09/23/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Outstanding work from Carrie Wedler, which was what
I was saying. All my animated movements are
just to say Carrie Wedler was fantastic. Really
really, that's, you know, what I was basically
saying before I found out it was muted
is, you know, she just has, like, a
unique ability. And I mean that, like, even
within the independent media
to just expertly
just transparently break these things down. And and
if
you are willing to hear or see what
she's saying, I just don't know how you
could ever ignore
how clear that is from, you know, from
government manipulating people regardless of the partisan side.
But what I was saying is we're not
really gonna get into, you know, that topic
in particular, but more so just a lot
of what that's highlighting, the propaganda, the manipulations.
But there's also, as usual, with the stories
that they want of, you know, Charlie Kirk
or whatever else that they recognize the power
structures
are grabbing your attention the right way to
elongate and stretch these things out and over
over emphasize and continue to point them out
over and over. You know, there's a lot
of information that people aren't talking about, a
lot of important information. So there's stories, two
of them that I'm gonna cover today that
I've had off to the side a little
bit, maybe for a week, maybe less,
that I just I really wanted to highlight
today that I think is very important that
ties back to kind of like the connection
between the COVID nineteen,
you know, vaccination and experimentation and everything else
that happened there and and the gain of
function overlap and how that relates to today
and where it's still going. Because let's not
forget, they really did not end gain of
function. Regardless of the executive order framed that
way, if you actually read it, it said
the exact opposite. There were parts that they
claimed that they thought were most dangerous that
they were going to stop,
but in out in the the version that
they found I think the term they used
was relevant or the most important that they
would continue those.
Still, it's gain of function. So at the
end of the day, they're doing new versions
of gain of function, and I think that
connects maybe exactly with what we're talking about
today.
If because they knew the AI direction was
where this was going. So we're gonna talk
about AI created viruses and AI being, as
I framed it, the new gain of function.
It's exactly what it sounds like, and it's
really easy to see. People are already calling
it out from the different expert scientific fields,
not politically your scientific,
or, you know, politically connected anyway. What right
or left are just people that are out
there going,
well, that sounds like the same thing, and
it very clearly could you know, and yes.
It is. I just want it's it it
already sees seems as if it's spinning out
that way. Now we're also gonna talk about
an important extension of that, which is just
the
kind of you'll you'll see why they connect
with the conversation of the surveillance and Israel
connection to it and the ongoing direction of
your digital ID
and what they call resident identity,
which is being pushed in this country and
is, of course, utilizing two very important
identity verification companies that are completely infiltrated by
Israel. No surprise there. And we'll go over
how clear that is and how this seems
to be the one these two groups, but
there's a lot of it taking place, already
seem to be completely immersed within the US
government, and they're owned and operated by Israeli
intelligence. And they're be pointed to as the
ones that are going to be in integral
in creating their
unsiloed kind of one stop shop, I guess,
depending on the way you'd frame that. You
but the point is
a central
one stop shop digital identification
for all government services and pretty much everything
else. All ain't framed as if it's gonna
be in your best interest for yours,
you know, convenience.
When I think, the obvious even if it
is completely
even if it makes your life better and
it is convenient, we have to recognize what
this is hap what's happening around this, who's
involved in it, and what it really amounts
to. I mean, if we're just giving up
on the the point of privacy because we're
expect you just kind of it's that narrative
like, well, they already have everything. Why should
I even try to hide that? No. They
don't already have everything. And they're sure as
hell trying. And even if they did, the
point would you shouldn't just sit back and
allow
entities to to invade our privacy and spy
on us and surveil us and push us
into that corner. So we're gonna go over
why that's very important. But if we have
time, we're gonna get to some conversations after
that in regard to Israel and some different
parts about the ceasefire. But we'll we're gonna
get into,
some early foreign policy points right out of
the gate that I want you to see,
kind of kind of rapid fire foreign policy
points that I need to include
that I think you'll be you you'll be
surprised about, actually.
But we'll make a couple point points in
regard to all this around TikTok and social
media and a couple of the points that
I wanna mention just in case we don't
get to it for time. But I'm gonna
start by simply shouting out Carrie Wedler again
because
just somebody you you need you should be
following. I mean, she really does outstanding work,
and she just has a a unique way
of breaking through for people. And as I
said on top of her video,
and she said, not all Americans, but the
programming is showing. I simply said, this is
not and this is weird term that doesn't
even it's not even, like, grammatically correct. It
seems to be being used all over the
place, both sidesing an issue. I mean, I
get why it's being used that way because
it's both sides of an issue. But the
point is
this is not both sidesing an issue.
As so many have mindlessly used online lately,
it is the objectively
obvious reality of team sport politics.
That is if you are able to see
the world as it is without dehumanizing partisan
lenses
or lens, as I wrote accidentally.
But you just have to this is not
something that is debatable. I mean, you can
see the tactics on both sides.
The real point, which is almost embarrassing to
point out that no one wants to say
about themselves, is that it's, well, we're doing
it for the right reasons.
Or it's not you know, if pushed, it
is the same thing, like Gavin McInnis and
the rest will say, but we're being hypocrites
because screw you because you deserve it. Hey,
at least they're being honest about that even
though that's childishly embarrassing to do and shows
that you're the same thing as them them
but you feel righteous because you're the right
side doing the wrong you know, you get
it. It's it's it's subjective.
You can decide you're doing the right thing
for the right reasons even though you're both
doing the same thing and you both think
that. You know, people can stand back who
are not lost in partisanship and go, well,
you're both just banging heads doing the same
thing. So it's important to see that.
Now, foreign policy.
I think it's really important that we don't
miss some of these things because a lot
of this is falling by the wayside because
of topics like this. Not to say anything
is more or less important. That's for you
to decide. But there are things being missed.
Something like this is getting a lot of
attention, but I think for the average people,
this isn't being, like, truly recognized.
I mean, I honestly,
the idea of
Syria and Jelani and the way it's gone,
I mean, they they're laughing in your face.
They this is almost a social experiment to
see if we can just literally turn Al
Qaeda into the person that's leading the country
and just say that's now okay and see
if you guys even care. I mean, I
think enough people are calling this out to
say, well, that's the leader of Al Qaeda
and Hayat al Sham that you literally told
us you were fighting. You had a bounty
on his head, and now he's just the
guy running Syria and that's okay and that's
not a complete contradiction of every value and
principle you've ever laid out on the table.
What about all the Americans that died fighting
al Qaeda? You know, this is what the
point they're gonna make here. I just don't
understand how that's possible unless we are in
a point where they're now just pulling the
mask off and saying,
we know that you know that you're not
controlling us as a government. We like, the
government's saying to you, we can see that
you as Americans do not have influence on
us, and we know that you know that,
and we know that you know we know
that, If that makes sense. Like, it's it's
like an unspoken agreement that they're like, we
but the point that I'm saying is that
that's deliberate.
Moving us into a position where they don't
even have to care about what we think
and say, that we're just the kind of
gaggle of people following along and hope that
they make the right choices because, well, they
have a mandate or whatever kind of momentum
they're trying to push into that governments can
just do what they want because some other
group that we're supposed to believe voted for
them as the majority, even though that doesn't
seem to exist today.
So Glenn Greenwald, The US fought a twenty
year war,
really ongoing, endless, I agree with that, in
the name of fighting Al Qaeda, which was
never really the case. Let's be real about
this, guys. That's not the reality.
As even he'll point out, the evidence is
not there. The evidence shows you clearly that
they were working in line with these people.
It's not hard to prove.
Now The US and a leading war on
terror general
welcome a long time Al Qaeda leader
on stage in a suit, of course,
whose head DOJ had a bounty of $20,000,000
less than a year ago because he serves
The US. Now that's okay.
And, I mean, that's as he's frank with
the point is, I I think it's obvious
you can show that they always have been
in line whether they knew that or not
with Israel US agendas. My point though is
that now because it's on the surface as
the leader that's serving this agenda, you can't
keep calling him a terrorist because you you
you want what he's present presenting. You want
to pretend he is that guy. But now
because he's front and center, it's all okay.
I mean, that alone should be earth shattering
for people because you can't deny this. They're
not denying this. They're not claiming he's not
the guy they had on the poster for
$20,000,000.
They're just pretending. They're just not addressing it.
And then interestingly enough, neither left nor right
media in the great mainstream media platform, and
then the token mainstream alternative media person on
the high chair in the room, none of
them seem to ask these questions. Why are
you talking to Al Qaeda? Why are you
allowing Al Qaeda to run Syria? Funny how
neither side of the false paradigm asked that
question.
Here
is former CIA director David Petraeus
wondering if he is getting enough sleep.
Right. Because, you know, the guy that you
were telling us we were murdering, Americans died
to go after, we were told.
Now you're worried about his health.
Imagine being one of the thousands of Americans,
Glenn writes, who were told that you had
to risk your life to destroy Al Qaeda.
You know, the very group, by the way,
that Trump says he's defeated a 100%. You
know, but he's sitting on the stage right
now, and Trump's okay with that. Only to
die doing so. Right? Americans fighting their toll,
but only to die going after something that
they weren't actually fighting. And then watch your
own government welcome a long time Al Qaeda
leader to your own country, have general Petraeus
gently ask how he's holding up.
So this next one is about you personally.
How are you holding up under all this
pressure?
Are you getting time
to
do some thinking?
Are you getting enough sleep at night? I
mean, you must understand that this is a
general who has all I mean, he's not
stupid. He's very aware of who this person
is, very aware of the narratives that he
spun personally in the past.
So you must just acknowledge this guy is
knowingly deceiving you. I don't know how else
you can put that together. And then also
extrapolate that out to the rest of everybody
involved, left and right of your entire government.
Again, I've been there,
and it is so very, very hard. And
your many fans, and I am one of
them,
we do have worries.
That's just absolutely insane.
Here is
a note remembering.
Al Qaeda is on our side. Jake Sullivan
said to Hillary Clinton in 2012, it was
released by WikiLeaks that we pretend isn't there
even though it's never actually I mean, nothing
a single piece that WikiLeaks has released has
ever been proven to be false at least
up until, I mean, it's hard to say
how much scrutiny it's gotten since,
they've parted, you know, that Julian Assange is
not necessarily in in charge.
Either way, the point is at this time,
that's clear still the standing reality. No one's
claiming these are false,
And it is real. You can prove it.
So they're telling you, but we just pretend
like it's not there. This is my point.
We live in this fantasy world of these
fake partisans, mainstream, and mainstream alternative, and they
act like everything's and we're all back here
with all the evidence going, well, everyone's lying
to themselves. Or they don't care, they don't
know, doesn't make a difference. The evidence has
always been there. They're lying to you. And
either these people in the media fields left
and right or mainstream alternative media are too
stupid to look or don't care or are
profiting along the way. It's hard to know.
But this is insane to me that we
can even be here. And, again, let's not
forget,
12/10/2024,
and these are these are real time images
you could check with the reverse image search.
These are people wearing ISIS patches that were
deployed in Syria within Israeli US controlled areas
that they were using to take over the
Syrian area and ethnically cleansing and executing people
all over the place that's still going on.
But how you feeling, man? You're sleeping okay?
It's insane. I mean, it's it's I the
word continues to be more relevant by the
day.
Now other foreign policy points, because you see
these I mean, each one of these, we
should do an entire show on. But, of
course, there's so much chaos and so many
ridiculous things happening that I just wanna make
sure you don't miss these points. Now this
is something we just touched on. We did
a show,
using here's the I don't know. Some something
I mean, we're we're by the way, quick
side note. We are in the trend we're
still going through
transitioning. We're working on the back end, like,
to get a new site. We're gonna you're
eventually gonna see some new changes on the
website.
Just it's insane to even try to get
into the kind of stuff we deal with
in the back end, and we're just baffled
by day by day. Right now, there's weird
things going on all across the site, so
we're trying to, like, expedite the process. But
just know that. And and that that's not
what's causing. This is stuff that we're recognizing,
attacks in the back end all the time.
But just there's, you know, weird things. I
don't wanna get into it. Stuff the website's
not functioning properly. Aside from that, I was
gonna grab this image that I can't find.
Screw it. The point was this was oh,
I should show you this. The,
Presidential Palace in Nepal. It's one of the
it's just the images that's showing right there.
Using Hamas, Israel threatens the world, and that
was in regard to, yeah, I mean, exactly
what it sounds like, but there's a lot
of overlaps to how that could be playing
out. We'll actually play that video for about
sixty minutes as it's relevant coming up in
a little bit. How technocrats incubated the digital
control grid in China. Well, technically, I forgot
that wasn't the title. The point was we
get into Nepal and the potential regime change
and and the information around it. So there's
the show if you'd like to watch it.
But a quick update on that. Brian Ber
Berletic
points out and he there's actually interesting you
can go back and he was doing this
throughout the day
for you know, going from three, now three
out of four, now four out of five,
and, like, he ends up going, okay. I'll
look into Paul's interim government. So my point
is you can go back through each one
and show his work and update to the
tweets before it. The reality is as his
research shows, the the new in term government
following The US backed regime change is, guess
what, a bunch of people backed and supported
by US and other outside money and people
working against the interest in for you know,
the typical regime change story.
But freedom, though. Right? It's all good. Peace
president when we're doing it. Verify and, see,
the reality is, again, people that aren't blinded
by partisanship can go, yeah. That's bad no
matter what side you're on.
Verified US funding behind four recently appointed ministers
means half of of the overall
eight ministers announced
so far have been draw drawn from US
government funded fronts they founded or headed. So
this is how you end up in a
position ten years from now, especially
if we didn't get this real time information,
like it wasn't happening as quickly back. You
know, I don't know what even before the
Internet, let's say.
That you would have no idea. You'd go
forward and have a Nepal government, and you
wouldn't know any better. They're all weirdly acting
against their own interest. Well, guess what? It's
easy to do this.
Harder do it in the you know, it's
easier seen, but it's not difficult with a
group that doesn't seem to care they're being
watched.
And it seems to be left and right
going back a while now, belligerently acting in
foreign governments, just yelling the word freedom. They
literally are overthrowing governments and putting people in
place that may have the right skin color
that are acting directly against the interests of
the people in the country.
And then when residents go, we don't want
them there. You're terrorists.
Right? And people actually try to do something.
Let's just even say, like, in The United
States through the constitution that says that we
can legally
remove the government, alter or abolish it, should
they act against interests of the American people.
But, of course, you even point to that.
You're written down on some list as a
terrorist by the US government because they're not
fighting for you, even though it's literally part
of the constitution. But let's say something like
that exists in Nepal, and those people go,
okay. We have a legal right, and we're
gonna remove you from government.
Well, they get attacked. They get shot. They
get called terrorists, or you get you get
captured by some NED, you know,
USAID
CIA front group that pretends you're part of
their group, and they over they burn everything
down and blame you. I mean, this is
classic textbook stuff that has been going on
a really long time. Even to Carrie's point
about the book crowd and the classic propaganda
around how these work, these things are textbook
at this point.
But my point I'm trying to get at
is not just that it's happening, but they
know you see this.
She he says there are two more ministers,
doctor Sangita Mishra, who worked at an extent
extensively USAID funded hospital
and and was even mentioned in a US
Embassy Nepal statement here. Now, of course, for
those that are gonna be blinded by partisan
narratives without looking at the facts, you're gonna
go put USAID doesn't exist anymore. That means
democrat. No. No. It doesn't. And it's very
much still being used by the state department
and the US government if you're paying attention.
More USAID funding for the hospitals here and
and another one named Ram Shower Khanal, who
is an expert advisor
at several Western funded partner think tanks in
Nepal. These two alone could be said to
have innocent connections, but together with the other
four overtly US backed proxies, makes a definite
pattern of standing up and overwhelmingly
pro US and US dependent interim government.
So where do you think the outcome's gonna
go? Either won't it'll won't be interim. It'll
just continue,
or
they'll transition into a very, very western pro
you know, pro US agenda, whatever.
And Israel, by the way, because that's usually
what these are about, over everybody else's interest
and the people on the ground.
Nothing new. How about Venezuela?
Right? This is an interesting article. US officials
say regime change in Venezuela is the real
goal. Surprise. Even though that's been transparently
the reason
now they're just I mean, not saying it
explicitly, but that cat is out of the
bag. US officials have told the New York
Times that the real goal of The US
military buildup in The Caribbean and the bombing
of boats in the region is regime change
in Venezuela. Not saying specifically regime change, but
that's in practice or
that's what they're describing.
So it's the reality is the Trump administration
is really just taking that mask off, which
I tend to appreciate.
The problem, though, is that they're normalizing the
type of action that is something we to
peep presidents used to get impeached for things
like this.
We don't control this country anymore. I think
that's beginning to become clear to people. So
peace president aiming to overthrow Venezuela because of
something that they want. Not about youth I
mean, drugs and the boats. I mean, do
we realize that they've already gotten caught for
revealing those things weren't even what they claimed
they were? Or the idea that they have
continued to go after this place for lithium
and oil and gold? And, I mean, it's
just frustrating.
But, you know, partisan narratives will win the
day right now for some people.
How about Afghanistan?
Gen X girl, we're gonna read an article
from her in a minute.
This orange a hole is now planning to
bomb Afghanistan.
So Trump says, it we we've been we
actually been watching this as day by day.
Right? We first came out. I I even
before he made that statement, the point was,
okay.
They never left Afghanistan if you're paying attention,
and that's now being proven. And then, of
course, the reality was that they were go
if outside of the, you know, we're not
there presence, that they were always go I
I my opinion was they were always gonna
go back because it's a centrally important location
to a lot of different dynamics. Ask Zavigniew
Brzezinski. It's something that's been long pointed out.
But the point, though,
is that from that you know, that he
ultimately would go back. Now he stood up
and said, we're gonna take the base back,
or that's a new breaking news, or we
want it. We're gonna ask him. They said
no.
No. That might be where it would end
if they weren't belligerent authoritarians. But, no, of
course, they just will we want it, so
we're gonna take it. No big deal. Like,
why even ask them? If Afghanistan doesn't give
the base back to those who built it,
he says, stupidly, because he's wrong, The United
States Of America, bad things are going to
happen, Donald Trump says. Of course.
Guess he didn't read his own information because
the Soviet Union built that in nineteen fifties.
That's not debatable, by the way. It's actually
very, very prominent information.
And I guess he doesn't know that, which
is silly. I mean, this is the president
of The United States. But or he knew
it, doesn't care, is just lying
on the surface.
So you so his gaggle of morons out
there, not I'm not talking about all conservatives
because I don't believe all of them are
on that side right now. I think they're
calling them out in most cases. But all
the blind team sport politics will be like,
no. We built that. Give it back. Just
like they did with Panama. These people are
mindless followers. Watch Benny Johnson and Nick Sorek
come out and scream the same thing. They
probably did already. Mean, this was on the
twenty first, so how much you wanna bet
they already did? Bottom line, we warned about
this in our last show. He's also apparently
unaware it was built by the Soviet Union,
but facts are secondary these days to the
partisan narrative in the agenda. Quite the peace
president, it would seem. Hashtag empire.
Let's see what happens. How much you wanna
bet this wasn't even about the base. And
they're gonna they're and they're already there, and
this will be rationalized by something else. Or
they'll go back for a base and literally
continue to illegally occupy a country while being
called the peace president because you didn't get
what you wanted. Stomping your feet. Right? Typical.
How about oh, this this was still Afghanistan.
Thomas Massey says poll is complete. 38,000
responses.
By a ratio of over five to one,
folks want us to stay out of Afghanistan.
This is nothing new. You can take a
poll, and the polls don't really get to
it. Right? They can be manipulated, but you
can go back as long as you want
looking at every possible poll taken. Americans
don't want more war. Now they can they
can give you the false impression by framing
the mainstream and mainstream alternative media, which is
what I keep telling you, but then explain
to me why every single poll going back
as far as you can look shows the
majority of Americans left or right do not
want to go to more war. So then
when they're all on TV acting like we
all have to do, that's because they're giving
you the fake partisan image, the mirage.
Americans don't want this. They know that.
Now here's White House.
He's quote and this is Donald Trump quoting,
Putin and Russia are in big economic trouble,
and this is the time for Ukraine to
act.
In any event, he says, I wish both
countries well. What a stupid thing to say.
What a dumb like, he is so bad,
but so consistently
pray framing himself like this independent third party
that's totally not involved.
And it's not working because it's really silly
and nobody I and a child can see
that's not the case,
but he does it while starting by acting
like they're in trouble and that's when Ukraine
should act. That means militarily, but, you know,
good good things to everybody. It's just stupid.
And he says, we will continue to supply
weapons to NATO for NATO to do with
them what they will. Because we're just independent
third parties. We have nothing involved. Right? Even
though it's literally your war, you and Israel.
On the surface, by the way.
I mean, do we really need to go
back? I mean, this is what's so frustrating.
Hold on. What was it?
Oh, that's alright. Sorry. The wrong title.
And this this was just a discussion we
had about this in particular.
The title was I was I thought it
was operational aerodynamic. That's the title of the
study
or the report anyway. Not just Azov. Documents
prove the CIA has been cultivating fascism in
Ukraine since at least 1948.
Document, which is right here,
Operation Aerodynamic.
It's a CIA document, 1966, and it goes
back to well before that. That's the the
date I'm citing.
And it literally outlines how they were going
to create a fascist force in this location
to use against the Soviet Union, which never
stopped. And the the Israel is on the
record funding this later down the line. You
can prove it. I've shown it many times.
So my point though
is that you're standing here acting like you're
not completely involved with what is happening. But
also saying, keep you know, here's the money,
NATO. So what about the fact that this
was over? Right? Ending this on day one,
Jones promised. Or everyone did. No. That's not
true. It didn't happen. And then months later,
Jones says, it's over, and we did it.
And then it didn't end. I'm just pointing
this out, how consistently they keep doing this
and now we're still here. And now it's
still good though because Trump's doing the right
thing because they didn't do their thing. But
the good thing was supposed to be the
ending of the war. Right? Or that NATO
was bad and we shouldn't exist, but now
we're giving them weapons to fund because they're
insured. Let them do what they want. I
mean, if you ever thought he was gonna
shut down what effectively is a world military,
you're
mindlessly lost because the reality is that it
backs up with nothing he's ever done.
He's a narrative to get that to to
manipulate the outcome of who the funding dynamic,
but absolutely was going to continue.
This is the continuation of everything we told
you would happen. The continuation of the war
in is with Israel on on Palestine, the
continuation of their joint war in Ukraine against
Russia or just using the mire to distract.
I mean, every everywhere you look. I mean,
quite literally, the things that we told you
would happen before this point, not because we
knew, because we were giving you our estimated,
our educated
opinion,
and we got called crazy and black pilled
and purity test, and now every single one
of them are happening. Go back and look.
Go back and look for yourself.
And all the people that said you're laying
you know, you're you know, the adults in
the room, the lesser of evils, purity test,
black pill shoving you aside, you guys are
stupid, but okay. They're all now telling you
the same things in varying degrees.
Some of them acting like they see it
now. Some of them acting like it's happening,
but here's why it's okay.
Go back and look for yourself.
Now
oh, I'll include this for you.
I'm gonna read this. So I'm gonna basically
just go over this. It's not very long.
A really well done article by Jen x
girl wrote for t lab posted today. And
this just this is important just in a
general sense. I could you know, this could
fit in a lot of places, but I
just wanted you to hear this early. And
I'm I my plan is to have, Catherine
Austin Fitts coming up soon to talk about
this.
How how American tax dollars prop up Israel's
zombie economy.
Now it says for decades, the unwavering support
of the US government for Israel has consistently
prioritized Israeli interests, often at the expense of
American taxpayers and their constitutional rights. Economist Thomas
Stauffer estimated that US support for Israel cost
taxpayers $1,600,000,000,000
between 1973
and 02/2002.
God, I can only tell. Imagine what it
is today. Using his formula, a conservative estimate
places that cost at approximately
$3,000,000,000,000
by 2024.
My but I right now, I feel like
well, I guess that in 2024 is a
good portion, but Trump has gone haywire with
that funding. But both it it has continued
to go in a crazy direction. And
with they so by 2024,
3,000,000,000,000
is equivalent to 8%
of the current $37,000,000,000,000
US national debt.
8%.
As global sentiment shifts and Israel forces increases
increasing economic and diplomatic sanctions
oh, I said forces. Excuse me. And and
Israel faces increasing economic and diplomatic sanctions by
and, really, truly, if you're not if you're
watching, in I mean, countries that were diehard
supporters, you know, shifting
changing tune. Right? But it's impossible that Charlie
Kirk might have been changing his opinion. Right?
It says the US government is taking drastic
measures to shield it.
Right? So as Israel is becoming more criticized
and more recognized for what it's doing, The
US is more and more stepping in front
of it with your money, with your country,
and defending this genocide committing government.
Not the country, but the government. Well, in
effect, it's the country because ultimately the government
has propped it up in a position that
will collapse their economy. So, you know, it's
the same thing we're dealing with here. That's
not the you know, in in many ways,
it is also, you know, the way that
people in this country have acted and responded
or not acted, but it's the government's fault
for lying to us about what they're doing,
like with the 2008 situation. Because don't forget,
that was very much the government was absolutely
involved with the overlapping situation.
Now it says
and so they're stepping in to shield it
and damaging both American economic interest and the
nation's international standing. And there's lot there's good
graphics she includes in this as well showing
you those information points. Now under the zombie
economy, Israel's economy is under under significant strain
as a result of its genocide campaign in
Gaza and to a lesser extent, the West
Bank, prompting increased US intervention.
Key vulnerabilities include, all sourced in here, their
zombie economy.
While information about Israel's struggling economy is not
widely discussed in the West, Israeli economists such
as doctor Sheer Heber
have concluded Israel's heavily relies on foreign investment
and loans to remain viable.
Otherwise, it's a zombie economy. Meaning that they
would see they would not be able to
exist
without foreign support. Now the you could argue
that that wasn't as bad as it is
today, but they were already going in this
direction before October 7. It says the, the
BDS
impact obviously, BDS, the movement boycott divestment in
sanctions is reducing forward investment. It has been
for quite a while. But then, of course,
the tech sector collapse, a 90%,
nine zero
drop in tech investments
has exasperated
economic instability.
Think about this for a second. Now is
that because
post October 7? I'm I mean, that's a
huge part of it. Right? But what I
think is the combination.
I think people are starting to recognize the
problem that Israel's tech industry represents,
whether national security. Like, it doesn't even have
to be anything about your purse your opinions
of the government, the people, the country, Jews,
anything. Because that's how it'll be framed. Right?
Oh, they just don't like Jewish people even
though really we're talking about a government. My
point is whatever you think is the mindset,
I think what's obvious is that people are
recognizing that this government
is wildly,
like,
infiltrating
aspects
that damage their interests at the for Israel
interests. And so why would you want something
like that unless you're sort of bound to
because you're compromised, blackmailed, manipulated? No country is
going to want somebody who creates set up
fake companies that are using basically hold,
cutouts for Israeli intelligence. They admit this. We'll
go over it more today. I mean, they
quite literally admit this. We play I mean,
here, since I'm even saying it, let me
just play it. We'll play it again. I
think it's a very relevant clip for people
to hear more than once.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies. No. No. Forget. This is Mossad
speaking with sixty Minutes about the pager attack
with Lebanon. So all he's saying, regardless of
what you think about what happened, because a
lot of lies around it, they're telling you
point blank.
We have we create fake companies,
and we put them out in the world.
He says it himself. I mean, he just
started. I will go back. Just a second.
There's no denying this, guys. And what that
means for people that are aware of that
is that there's a at very least at
very least, excuse me, a national security risk.
But on top of that, you then have
them acting as companies that affect your economy
and everything else. And it especially once it
gets larger and larger,
that are not there for that reason.
They're act you know, they're, you know, pulling
strings where they should. I mean, it gets
it gets very deep. And when you really
stand back and look at the bigger picture,
it's real it's really starting to be called
out in The UK, in The United States.
It's insane because of how much it affects
all these dynamics, and it's at the expense
of in from The United States and American
interest.
Abilities
of an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way being traced back to
Israel. I mean, I just am so baffled
by the fact that they even said that
out loud, but people deny that they I've
played this video, people deny that that's even
the case. Oh, he's just making it up.
Well, I guess that's possible. Sure. But are
you ignoring all of the real world evidence
that shows that's exactly what they're doing? And
the fact that they've made those companies, they
parade those companies, they promote those companies, they
make articles about those companies. I mean, you
you just can't hide from this. Sell companies
oversell companies who affect the supply chain to
our favor. Yes. We create a pretend world.
We are a global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors,
and the world is our stage.
Now we'll play the other half when we
get to it and come back.
But, I mean, how relevant is that? Right?
I mean, that does there's never there's never
a moment where that's not relevant in the
current conversation. So the point to what her
article is saying is that so the the
tech sector collapsed
90%.
Now I what I was saying is I
think there's a combination here.
Yeah. So I'm glad she's citing. She does
a good job on this. She check out
her threads.
Really well done. Well sourced. So my point
is
did this was already happening. Right? I think
people were seeing this, but post October 7,
I think that, you know, it
this blew open this conversation.
And so people are now looking like they
never have, including governments, by the way. And
so I think this is I mean, how
do you survive something like that when you've
built your entire economy around it in particular?
So that's a that's one of many, by
the way. So tourism, post October 7, has
completely stopped.
You just keep I mean, that that so
you could argue that this is because of
those alone, and that's a you could make
the argument. It's the most important right now,
but it has been happening before this. It
was already having trouble.
Post port damage bankruptcy. Eilat Port declared bankruptcy
in 2024 while other ports have been damaged
during Israel's war with Iran. Weapons dependency. While
Israel buys weapons from The United States using
American taxpayer money, by the way, which is
absolutely crazy, it depends on European supply chains
that are increasingly imposing sanctions. Right? The the
walls are closing in. But think about that,
giving $38,000,000,000
over ten years, which is way more than
that, 3.8 every every year that way more
than that at the end of the day,
and then using that to just buy weapons.
So you're giving them free weapons. I mean,
that's what that breaks down to.
Israel's economy contracted
in q two twenty twenty five
primarily due to the severely disruptive twelve day
war with Iran in June. Remember, they frame
this as the as Trump says, like, the
most the most effective military operation in history.
How embarrassing. Because they completely and utterly failed.
Anybody honest, and I'm clue and I'm talking
about American reporting from left and right and
and the facts on the ground. They didn't
do what they tried to do. And Iran
effectively
very much broke through with their response,
hitting places like the Mossad headquarters, by the
way. And they just lie about it. So
and they did. They they severely disrupted them
in that in that process. Now the GDP
shrank by 3.5%
annually and point 9% quarterly.
All major components fell with a sharp 12.3
drop in investment and a 4.1%
decline in private consumption. Exports plummeted 12%, while
imports also decreased by 3.5%.
Just an all around
decrease in
well, you know, lot not growth, but
any decrease in profitability.
Reflecting this impact, the Bank of Israel recently
lowered its 2025
growth forecast to 3.3.
In 2024, Israel ran the largest budget deficit,
which is the gap between the government's revenue
and expenses in a given year. Its genocide
campaign in Gaza and shrinking economy has widened
the gap between government spending and revenue collection
taxes.
Now to bridge this gap in funding, Israel
has been selling a record amount of bonds.
This is where it comes into the important
part, how it's affecting your tax dollars and
and your life.
That you that you're basically being forced to
well, the government's using your your tax dollars
to buy,
let's put it this way, a bad investment.
They're being they're using these money the money
to make bad investments that benefit Israel at
your expense.
The real question is why. Right? Why? Well,
because they're not working for your interest. They're
selling it as either support for Israel, which
shouldn't be your responsibility to use your tax
dollars. In many ways, by the way, we're
talking about funds that use, like, like payroll
and, like, what's the term that was used?
It goes into it in the article. Like,
you know, different mass investment funds that use
money from corporations and different, you know, schools
and industries and bend largely government. And they're
taking that money and investing in Israeli bonds,
which are
increasingly losing money.
And why would they do that if the
interest was about, one, investment is gaining money,
or two, about doing so to benefit the
American people? Neither of those things are happening,
and this is the point. And they're doing
it anyway. And now forcing in many ways
or rather stopping people from having the ability
to divest from these things.
Sovereign this is the bridge to gap. They
Israel has been selling a record number of
bonds. Israel issues three types of bonds to
foreign investors. Sovereign bonds,
unwritten by banks and tradable on financial markets,
US guaranteed bonds, backed by the full faith
and credit of the US government, which assumes
liability if they default. That's one big part
of it, or Israel bonds,
underwritten by the Development Corporation for Israel and
not sellable on secondary markets.
Now US guaranteed bonds for Israel are a
form of US government backed loan guarantee authorized
by Congress.
Now why this even happens in the first
place, especially with a government that is actively
acting against American interests, you know, I think
speaks for itself, but it says this program
enables Israel to borrow from private commercial lenders
at more favorable lower interest rates just because.
The US guarantees the debt should Israel default.
You do then. They're putting you on the
line if they don't pay back what they
owe. The current program is based on a
twenty to two thousand three authorization of $9,000,000,000
in guarantees
designed to help Israel access capital on better
terms.
As as of 2025, Israel has utilized 4,100,000,000.0
with 2.3 available for you for future use.
Sovereign bonds
are underwritten by banks. So for this purpose
of the article she writes, we'll focus on
in the future. The Israel bonds are the
most important part.
The development corporation for Israel bonds is a
New York registered broker dealer that serves as
an underwriter for Israel bonds.
It markets these bonds not only to the
individual, but also to investment funds, pension system.
That's the word I was looking for. Pensions
and so on. Civic and and religious institutions,
state and local governments. Because typically, what they
do with these you know, they'll have funds
like this that they'll use not with the
like, the the to invest in things with
the point of gaining a return.
Right? So that that money can supposedly help
the state, the local, the city. Right?
But that's not what's happening.
Since 10/08/2023,
over 35 US states and local governments have
purchased Israel bonds.
Of these 35,
specific data is available for 17
US states and nine counties,
which have invested 2,400,000,000
of state and local government and employee pension
funds in Israel bonds.
In the same period, credit rating agencies such
as Moody's,
Fitch, and, S and P downgraded Israel's credit
rating and warned of the potential to reach
what's called joke status.
And not only are they not they're and
they're doing this regardless and even pushing further.
This assessment is reflected in their performance, it
says. According to reporting by DropSiteNews,
Israel bonds earned 20%
lower returns than when purchased.
So that's what's called a bad investment,
and they're simply doubling down, losing you money.
Americans have consequently lost an estimated $320,000,000
in pension gains due to state and local
officials who raised caps on foreign bond purchases
and specifically acquired high risk Israel bonds.
Florida, being the shocking leader of it all,
largely Republican, by the way,
Israel's strategy targets US states and local governments.
In a briefing at the Knesset, the former
chief censor and director of the Ministry of
Strategic Affairs, Brigadier General Sima Valkindill,
who works for various Israeli funded NGOs operating
within The United States,
stated it is easier to pass laws in
favor of Israel at the state and local
levels to The US. Right? Now also, you
might wanna ask yourself why a Brigadier General
is operating a
non governmental organization
inside The United
States. Nothing nothing weird there. Right? No weirdness
to have all these I mean, I'm it's
not even worth joking about for crying out
loud. Literally had the military. You know, it's
it's just insane how obvious all this is.
But, of course, the point is stated it's
easier to pass laws. That's what he's saying.
It's easier to manipulate this country at the
local level, of course.
37
states
have anti boycott laws. That's I mean, textbook
unconstitutional.
Where are all the courts?
Where's congress?
Nobody cares. You know why? Because I think
almost every one of them in some way
are beholden or afraid of what'll happen if
they say something.
35 states have adopted the IHRA based censorship
laws that equate criticism Israel with antisemitism.
Alright? So you can't say Israel's government did
a bad thing because you're racist all of
a sudden.
That is not that's it's it speaks for
itself.
17 states and nine counties
from these states have also purchased high risk
Israel bonds.
Now it says an investigation by the International
Consortium of Investigative Journalists reveals that Israel Bonds
has engaged in a sophisticated
sales operation funneling billions of dollars from US
state and local governments to Israel.
Through highly personalized pitches and pro Israel messaging,
the group cultivated exceptionally friendly relationships with public
officials.
Often, as usual, blurring ethical lines by offering
access to glitzy events, gala dinners, and private
meetings with top Israeli leaders.
In September 2025, as we covered,
a delegation of 250
US state lawmakers were invited to Israel for
an all expense paid trip called 50 states
and Israel.
US officials frame these investments as shows of
support. So what they're essentially saying is buy
something that will lose you money even though
our job I mean, you could argue they
have, like, a fiduciary responsibility to make money
in these situations in some cases.
And yet they're saying, we're gonna do this
even though the point is to make money
to support Israel. So we're gonna lose money
to help a government commit genocide.
And, she writes, doing so instead of sound
investments.
Ethics experts, of course, warn that such dealings,
which mix personal benefits with official financial decisions,
cross ethical boundaries and raise concerns about conflicts
of interest and FARA violations.
Right? The foreign affairs that that's about,
like like, for example,
APAC.
Right? It's a foreign entity
acting within this country as an as if
it's a US entity. That that they need
to register as a foreign agent.
Because if they did, they wouldn't be able
to do what they're doing, and that's why
they don't. Don't forget that regard to JFK
assassination, that was a major part of what
people argue was one of the likely points.
Or the the Mona Nuclear Facility, for example.
But registering them as a foreign agent, APAC,
called something different at the time, was what
was about to happen. And he got killed,
then it didn't happen.
You could think about that for yourself.
Through these efforts, Israel has successfully lobbied for,
policies that entrench US support, often at great
risk in American taxpayers.
US policies actively divert taxpayer funded resources to
Israel.
Because America first. Right? Negatively impact its national
standing in the world and suppress criticism on
boycotts of Israel, infringing on American rights by
punishing boycotts.
Shockingly unconstitutional.
State and federal laws penalize individuals and businesses
for participating in boycotts against Israel. And it
says as recently as September 2025, house of
representatives passed a provision in the twenty twenty
five, twenty twenty six National Defense Authorization Act
that will blacklist government contractors that boycott Israel
from receiving federal contracts.
We're being forced to fund a genocide.
Criminalizing
criticism.
21
IHRA antisemitism bills have been introduced in congress
to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
How in the world are we not seeing
this? The
self evident,
unconstitutional
acts. They know what they're doing. No judges.
No congressmen. No one's saying a word. And
they I mean, okay. If we're gonna quibble
about unconstitutional actions of Donald Trump as the
left,
but this is being allowed, all it shows
you that it it is ultimately politics. Doesn't
mean we shouldn't call it out because it
is still a constitutional issue. The point though
is that none of them in power seem
to really care about solving the problem.
Forcing investment in Israel bonds. Americans are being
coerced into purchasing high risk Israel bonds. So
in a sense, you are being forced to
support the genocide whether you want to or
not.
It says without any awareness that their tax
dollars or pension funds have been invested in
risky bonds, funding Israel's military, taxpayer dollars are
funneled into Israel's military
despite their own domestic needs or despite our
domestic needs. Same point either way. Fighting Israel's
wars, The US spends billions on conflicts aligned
with Israel's interests
instead of America.
The US government has spent at least $75,000,000,000
on Israel
just in the last two years alone.
That's my point about the number from before.
I mean, that's just what we can prove
right now.
Now it says, additionally, laws in states like
Pennsylvania this is what really throws me.
Laws in places like Pennsylvania
specifically
prohibit
divestment from Israel bonds.
Think about that. So not only have they
gone so far as to force you to
do something that make essentially force you to
fund a genocide and
invest in something for your profit that loses
you money and they know that,
they're they're passing laws that say you're not
legally allowed
to pull back from a bad investment that
is funds genocide. Now how do you make
sense of that? I mean, that that that
that goes beyond unconscion that seems like illegal
to me. How are you arguing that you
can illegally I mean, it's it's unconstitutional
at the core, but there there's overlaps here
that are beyond this is illegal.
Whether it's that you're working with a foreign
agent, whether it's your I mean, there's many
ways you could overlap this. And it says
in 2025, Florida passed legislation
barring local governments from refusing to purchase unrated
high risk Israel bonds.
Israel started issuing unrated bonds after credit agencies
lowered their credit rating.
Now it says Israel bonds and Israel's lobby
crackdown on student protesters. The Israel lobbies push
for anti BDS. The anti free speech legislation
is directly connected to these bond investments.
Since the early two thousand, students on university
campuses have pressured their universities
to divest from Israel.
In 02/2016,
Israel Bonds launched a a program called alternative
BDS. I didn't even know about this. I
this is so insulting. They cut so they
they started a program 2016
to combat BDS called BDS
bonds donated to schools.
And it's very deliberate what they did, encouraging
wealthy pro Israel donors to buy these bonds
and simply donate to these universities,
which they'd have a hard time turning down.
Right? Then, since universities
legally must hold the bonds until maturity,
this effectively binds them to Israel financially
and procrues divestment no matter what they want.
Like, this is very deliberate and very insidious.
Since universities must hold the bond oh, I
just read that. It says, the strategy underscores
the extensive
pro Israel,
influence pro Israel donors wield over academic institutions.
Now ask yourself why they had this massive
pushback in regard to people protesting.
And they lied about almost every part of
it. Pretty much like this entire cabinet has
continued to lie about what they're doing for
Israel's interest at your expense.
This strategy underscores the extensive
influence pro Israel donors wield over these institutions
and their efforts to suppress student criticism of
Israel. Since Israel's genocide campaign in Gaza, the
pressure campaign to divest from Israel has exponentially
increased. In response, the Israel lobby launched an
aggressive attack on students through doxxing campaigns.
A foreign government
doxxing
American citizens.
Your government high fived them and pushed harder.
That just blows me away.
So doxy campaigns, arrests, expulsions, deportations
for Israel. The Israel lobby also worked through
the Trump administration to pressure over 4,000 universities
to adopt an unconstitutional definition of antisemitism,
implement a IHRA mandatory training,
and adhere to ADL's campus antisemitism report card.
I mean, you literally have an Israel the
the foreign government giving report cards about whether
American people are acting the right way. That's
insane.
The
culmination of which is a total crackdown on
student protesters and the BDS campaign. Now we'll
get to the Antifa overlap.
The same point, regardless of the reality of
how Antifa is used and government involvement in
some parts of this, this is going to
be used the same way for this reason.
You're going to pretend that anything now is
what you say it is, like you've already
done everywhere else, and go after people that
are protesting what you don't like, which is
what Trump's already been doing.
Now it says much like student protesters as
Americans become aware of federal, state, and local
governments purchasing these high risk Israel bonds at
your expense
based on political ideology rather than sound financial
decision making, we are beginning to see resistance
at a local level. Now right there alone,
if you can recognize they're making
political ideology based decisions as opposed to sound
financial decisions and they have a fiduciary responsibility,
do something about it. You have an opening
right there to get somebody to call them
out for what they're doing. This is the
you know, this is like the woke version
of the left on the right, where you
have Gillette making commercials
about toxic masculinity despite that being their entire
market. In this case, you have people that
their job is to make you money who
are not doing so for Israel.
You see the point? It's a principle that
it's the same kind of thing.
And she goes over many examples.
We're beginning to see resistance at the local
level, and she points out the Presbyterian Church
in July 2024 in The United States voted
to divest from these bonds, denouncing Christian Zionism.
New York City, their city comptroller stopped renewing
Israel bonds and drove the holdings down to
zero. Now I'm sure something bad's gonna happen.
You know, there's a very dangerous spot to
do that, but he said the point is
he's standing up for the right thing, regardless
of your political side. And this has nothing
to do with where you support Israel and
the war. That this is a fundamental
financial decision that is they're doing so for
if this was about any other government, it's
still a ridiculous thing to allow. The Connecticut
genocide certainly makes it a lot more important.
The point the point is many different examples.
And I think this is a really important
article to understand. And I hope she continues
to write more because I'm looking forward to
her, you know, follower account. Her link is
right down here at the bottom.
Right here included. Make sure you follow her.
So great work.
Are you okay with this? Are you okay
that your government is allowing is propping up?
I mean, this is the point right now
more than ever. If if United States wanted
to stop what's happening, all they have to
do was stop funding them.
Kick out the stick. Right? Stop propping them
up. It's over.
But no. They don't. Because in effect, you
have to you have to understand that are
that really makes this now their genocide. Not
just that they're supporting it, but they are
literally the ones that are maintaining the ongoing
genocide because they could stop it tomorrow.
So let's talk about a few things before
we get into, like, the two major topics
today. And depend and we're seeing as,
we'll talk about an hour. We'll see. I
I really would like to get to the
later topics today, but if I don't, it'll
be given we'll get to the next show.
I believe,
let's say, it looks like most likely 90%
tomorrow. That's what my plan is anyway.
Let's get into a po some points about
Epstein
and the the the conversation around it that
I'm gonna keep up on. I think it's
important because how obviously that's something they don't
want people focusing on. We're gonna make a
quick point about Tom Homan and a mention
of the Tylenol,
autism point, and let's get into the meat
of this, which I really think is important.
AI created viruses.
But first
I'll make sure I oh, sorry. Put this
open. Okay. First, this is an important thing
to highlight. That I just you know, this
really just speaks to, you know, there's something
amiss, guys. Right? I mean, with whatever's going
on from the, you know, million dollar royal
dinner where you're, like, literally, like, if whatever.
Like, you literally would have asked Alice Jones
what the deep state globalists were before that
dinner. He would have listed those people off.
Now they're all sitting there with Trump and
say, hey. We're winning, you know? Blind stupidity.
The point though is that you in events
like that or or or all of these
or or, you know, Elon Musk and Trump
and the and what this is the point
here and their relationship and what actually happened
and what Doge was about. And I mean,
every single moving part, it doesn't add up.
So too did the stories not add up,
like with Butler or Tyler Robinson. Like, something
very strange is going on around all this,
and it's not it is
I think it's a problem that's always been
there, but I think we all recognize that
there's more to it right now.
And average people are noticing these things.
Now this is just showing up from before.
Elon
Musk on in May said time to drop
the really big bomb.
Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. We
all remember that. That is the real reason
they have not made the public.
Now you could argue that he was just
playing a game there and knows his name
was on those files, not necessarily to commit
a crime. And he's just using that to
to poke Trump in the eye because they
were arguing. But however you wanna look at
it, guys, the fact that you can say
something like that. And then since then, we
have yet to see the information come out.
And then all of a sudden, we get
this MAGA voice. Imagine being 79
with five children, 11 grandchildren, hanging out with
your best friend, Elon.
The left can't stand this. Like, they're just
so childishly,
desperately trying to frame it as the you
know, we're you know, like like, okay. So
you you want it to be that Elon
and them are best friends and that they're
superseding all the effect. I mean, or they
hate each other, and this was a publicity
stunt. My point is these MAGA blind followers,
just like the blind left followers during COVID,
will go after whatever they can to make
their political point regardless of the facts because
they're children. They're all out there screaming what
they want you to hear. The funny the
thing is, how do you make sense of
this? How do you argue, oh, they're best
friends, they're great. Okay. Then why in the
world did he say that? Why did he
say Trump was a ridiculous person before he
ended up in the cabinet? Why did he
attack him? You can't just pretend those aren't
there. That's what a child does because you
wanna see what you wanna see.
I think it's important to think about how
this played out. Nothing odd about that at
all. Right? Now they're now they're hanging out
again. No big deal. Or it was all
about some misdirection,
getting you to think I mean, who knows?
But the obvious point is that's pretty weird.
Right? It doesn't make sense.
Here's what he said before they got into
office.
Shouldn't surprise you seeing as how
we every one of them said the same
thing, and it's here we are now. You
know, I I think part of why Kamala
is getting so much support
is that,
if if Trump wins, that FCN client list
is gonna become public. Right. They were squeezing
that for everything they could. Oh, that's because
all the Democrats know that Trump gets in.
He's gonna let it go, so we gotta
support Kamala.
Oh, clearly not. Okay. So and Trump is
on there too, and they all know that.
And now the whole thing has flipped, and
now the left is going, Trump's on there.
We know it. And he's hiding it for
you. I mean, a again,
an objective
observer can stand back and go, well, clearly,
they're both at different points in time doing
the same thing, the same argument.
So
one of the logical
arguments is that they both know that they're
not gonna release it, so they're both playing
it to their interest when they can. I
know. That's crazy. Right? It's not like we
haven't seen them do that about a
100 different things.
Is frustrating. Right? Because we always have to
play this stupid game. We're banging our head
against this partisan wall when I'm I've half
the time think all of you already see
it anyway. And I'm just arguing against a
machine that's not gonna change anyway. But for
the people that might not see it, it's
important to highlight these things. But okay. So
then he gets in and that doesn't happen.
Right? So how do you make sense of
it? Trump wins. That Epstein client list is
gonna become public. Yes.
Yes.
And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are
terrified of that outcome. Oh, are they? I'm
sure they are.
I'm sure they are. Right? And the same
ones that are also funding Trump. Because let's
not forget that we can clearly show, like,
with the Palantir carpent, you know, they they
they most of these billionaires
hedge their bets, fund both sides.
You could look for yourself. It's not hard
to see because the reality is most of
them are not about one side. They're about
using the political game they see that manipulates
all the peons
to gain what they want from it.
Thomas Massie
release the Epstein files.
And just in case you forgot what Kirk
said about it The DOJ should immediately move
to unseal all the Epstein documents in the
Southern District Of New York. Yeah.
Yeah. Really fighting for Charlie's memory. Right? Everything
except file sexual assault material. I think every
file should be released to the public the
same way as the JFK files. Let the
American people decide. Put them all out there
because if there's nothing in there, then we
can see there's nothing in there. Now
Yeah. Right, Megyn Kelly. Right. Now what's you
saying today?
Might wanna look at that. Might wanna compare
what the, you know, absolutely. We know because
they'll come right out. We know it'll all
be all, and then all of a sudden
it changes. Why? Because the team says. So
now you're not saying that because the team
says we're not supposed to say that anymore.
I mean, somebody who could honestly sit on
Piers Morgan and claim that Palestinians would rather
watch their children starve to death
than help a Jewish person or whatever ridiculous
claim she made, something like that. They just
basically said they'd rather kill their own children
than do anything to to stop the war.
Like, just insane levels of deranged stupidity.
It's not true. I mean, it's it's just
self evidently not true. The point overall is
these people will tow the line. Heck, Megyn
Kelly has shown that many times.
Now whether you think Kirk was the same,
you can ask. It seems more and more
anomaly when the more you look into it.
But either way, as I said, I personally
saw plenty of examples of things that I
found were pregnant, things that I that I
felt were deliberately manipulative.
But may you know, the people in these
positions make rational decisions to, you know,
manipulate certain things, highlight certain things the wrong
way, ignore them entirely for the team.
Like, it's like rationalizing why you make a
choice that you don't like because the other
side's worse. That's what this game does to
people. So you can decide whether you think
he was part of it, whatever else.
The point
is that he stated publicly
that he wanted him to release. It looks
like they all did. But that's worth remembering
seeing as how now they're using his memory
to hide these things. Cause that's ultimately what's
happening.
Now, here's Charlie Kirk as well. I'll include
the video, we already played it. Saying that
Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent. You know,
just in case that feels relevant to you.
Right? Clearly, not the thing you're supposed to
be saying. And I think it's important to
highlight that this was building up in the
last couple of weeks beforehand.
Here is the Democrat,
which means whatever she has to say is
probably gonna be flatly ignored by people that
are on the other side, even though
just because she's a Democrat does not make
it false. It clearly means, in my opinion,
that they have a motive behind it. As
Bruce will tell you, they all have ulterior
motives left and right across the board.
But remember, just because somebody has a political
interest in pointing to something does not make
that thing false. It could, and you should
question that, but it makes you just as
ignorant, willfully so, if you pretend it's automatically
false because of where it's coming from. It
usually means that you don't wanna hear what
it is.
Yes. Democrats lie, just like Republicans lie.
Bombshell. Right? Here's what, Melanie Stansbury says. Now
don't forget, Alex Acosta was just brought in,
again,
to be questioned about all of this. Why
now? Why did it take so long? Alex
Acosta was in the first Trump administration.
You know, they're trying to make this appear
like something it's not. Alex Acosta is a
game player in the game. Absolutely toe the
line, benefited from it.
Apparently, she said the testimony of forty minuteors
was not enough to convince then US attorney
Alex Acosta,
later a Trump appointee,
to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein.
This is one of the biggest cover ups
of our generation. Now do you think representative
Meli Stansbury
knows that this is an all accompanying, you
know, left and right thing? I don't know.
She may be a newer one. I don't
know. The point is you should question them
all equally and the facts need to matter.
But we should consider the reality of what
you're saying here because you can look back
and look at this information. The point is
that Trump allowed that person in the team,
supported that person, covered that person after he
said the thing you were supposed to say,
that they were part he was part of
intelligence. And that's what he said in that
first meeting.
And that's why they told me to leave
him alone. And then they brought him on
the team.
That that's what they want. They want somebody
who's willing to ignore their integrity, their morals,
their principles for the team, left and right.
That's what they do.
Here's what she said in the video.
At least 40 minors
who gave sworn statements to the FBI as
part of the investigation
before
a decision was made in this case that
they had been raped, abused, and trafficked,
over 40 minors.
And the line prosecutor
in this case
wrote
an 82 page memo
to the leadership
in the US attorney's office recommending a prosecution.
And she was so convinced,
based on the evidence and interviews that she
had taken and reviewed,
that she drafted
a 53
page indictment in this case.
And what mister Acosta just told us
is that based on his assessment
of the case with his team,
that he did not see sufficient evidence to
move forward
with prosecuting
the case. The Now remember, this is after
the recent
kind of briefing from him, and also remember
that this is the same kind of thing
we heard from Cash recently.
Right? All of the,
victims, survivors that are standing with Thomas Massie.
Right? Not the 20 he referenced, but the
ones that are publicly standing there with him.
All saying release our information. Stop using our
names to hide all of this. He's he
suggested oh, excuse me. So that's one part
of it. Now I am referencing the 20
that Thomas points to. I'll read in a
second that he says or, you know, that
they've been there 20 different statements they've taken
about these names involved. There's 20 people's names
that were involved and asked Cash about it,
and Cash suggested they weren't credible.
Thomas Massey followed up. And I said, are
you suggesting they're not credible? And that that
is the point. That you're saying the three
administrations,
left and right, have all looked, and they
they are dismissing the same point.
Look at all the evidence we're talking about
here. All of the proof you have this
is I mean, proof that this did happen.
Now may not every version and every story,
but this did happen. Yet 40 chill minors,
20 different people on the record, all this
data's been there. Now fine. If you wanna
tell us this is all fake, then release
it. What what what harm does that make?
If you're telling us you've credit you've looked
at it, it's not credible, then there's no
reason to protect it. Right?
There's a very obvious story happening here, and
I think it's important that we recognize that
this will kick I mean, if this continues,
the let the next administration
will do the same thing. And now watch
the game flip where they're gonna say and
they'll let you know, oh, now they're gonna
take they're gonna add our names, and we're
gonna take ours off. It's the same thing.
I I mean, I hope it comes out
in one way or another, but the reality
is this is gonna continue. They're gonna kick
the can down the road, I think. There
were weaknesses
in the case.
When asked
if he
made the decision
as to whether or not to prosecute fully
prosecute this case, he took responsibility
for it.
He said it was the decision of him
and his team. But when asked if he
had directly reviewed the evidence itself
in this case, he said that he had
not actually
read the statements of the victims.
So let me just say this.
Something doesn't smell right here.
Yeah. You know, and it's very easy to
say that now. Right?
But just like I keep saying, guys,
like, I mean, look. Do I believe that
they're acting with intent with good intention? No.
I mean, I don't believe I mean, this
is it possible that they're doing this because
they know it won't come out? Yes. Is
it is it possible they're doing it because
they wanna put this you know, make Trump
look like the one not? Yes. That does
not then make that false. You understand? That's
the important thing to think about. Because the
realistic the the the evidence suggests that it
is definitely what's going on.
You know? And so
does your intention pure? Probably not. But we
still should see the outcome.
And I think this is gonna continue to
be pushed. Right? The the people, they don't
want this to be talked about. Now I
wanna play,
I'll play it in a second. I wanna
play a video back with the other article,
but I'll I'll wait I'm gonna go through
these next few posts, and then I'll play
it. It's a maybe I'll just wait for
the second. It's a good video from a
daughter of a of a representative
calling out the the Israel connection.
Before that,
continuing on this conversation of
of, Epstein and also Ghislaine Maxwell, we'll get
to in a second.
Here's Thomas Massie
calling out Kash Patel.
And he simply says, quote, I told director
Kash Patel, he's referencing back to the exchange
in
congress, that the FBI has names of 20
men
to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women and girls.
Remember,
Patel was out there literally claiming he trafficked
to no one but himself.
This is my point about him shooting himself
in his that's stupid. That's that's not just
you don't know the case. That's that's a
a a lack of intelligence move
because you can't traffic. You see, that's not
how that works. So you that means you
didn't traffic. That means you procured you know,
you abused women and you procured prostitutes. So
that you the point is you that you
to traffic, there needs to be somebody who
purchases, who who you transfer.
You know, that's the point. That's what Maxwell
was in prison for.
And so he does he says something like
this. I think thinking that he's gonna get
the back end of the Trump administration. Boy,
you do not know who you're working with.
You are gonna be thrown to that bus
so fast.
But I think he's starting to think that.
He says the basic
Massey continues. The basic facts seem to surprise
him.
20 people.
And so he says, is the FBI withholding
those names to protect the president's rich and
powerful friends?
Massey continued before demanding that the administration release
the Epstein files. He says, quote, I believe
that Trump is trying to protect a rich
and powerful people who are his friends, and
that is why the material is not getting
released, Massey says.
Now to be honest, the the fact that
Massey is going so hard on this
suggest that maybe he's not on there. And
that would line up with the rest of
the way he's acted, but I wouldn't assume
that. As much as it makes sense with
his past principled actions, I think that you
have to question everything.
My point though is that it feels like,
you know, he has been kind of an
anomaly.
And if if you were on this list,
would you be pushing this hard? You know,
it's hard to think, but you may just
know that it won't come out. You know,
think about that. But he says this spring
or this was,
a Democrat, Raskin, saying this spring, you ordered
hundreds of agents to pour over all the
Epstein files, but not to look for more
clues about the money network or the network
of human traffickers.
You pull these agents from their regular counterterrorism
and drug trafficking duties as well as sexual,
investigations,
like sexual abuse, pedophilia,
sexual trafficking rings. That's something that,
Melnick points out. Way in the beginning of
this, when they shifted all these people, they
took them off all these investigations around sexual,
you know, predators.
Think about how dumb that is with what
they were saying. You know, it just it
doesn't make any sense until you realize they
don't care about any stuff. They're they're this
is about something else entirely. But he says
you pulled them off to go from these
important things to to work around the clock,
some of them sleeping at their desks, to
conduct a frantic search to make Donald Trump's
name image were flagged and redacted. Now that
is you can't deny this. This was admitted
by their own team at this point.
So here we are.
Now Maxwell,
I just can't believe how silly this is,
and where are all the Republicans? Right? There
should be a lot of people with integrity
talking about how insane this is. And it
I'm sure there are, by the way. But,
I mean, I I would imagine it should
be more if it's just if this was
you know, people were just being honest, this
would be everywhere.
The jail VIP.
This is the the front page of the
mirror in in in in Britain.
Ghislaine Maxwell exclusive, the jail VIP. Sex offender
enjoys cushy prison life as she strolls to
a yoga class.
Yeah. You she that that that sexual predator
is really getting what she deserves. Right? I
mean, they already borderline con what? Was it,
Newsmax? Try to make the argument that she
was the victim,
and that's kind of imploded in certain ways
by the team as well. I mean, this
is insulting. Now all the Epstein victims are
out there screaming about this
because this is insulting to them.
They know she's involved, and the Trump administration
is
giving her a cushy, I no. They look.
I'll read from this directly. This is from
the mirror the article. Ghislaine Maxwell pictured for
first time since sex trafficker was moved to
cushy jail.
Sex trafficker child sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell strolls
to a yoga class yoga class in the
cushy new lockup where she's still serving a
twenty year stretch. And it's already, by the
way, despite the pushback, she does, if they
push for it, she does have the ability
to leave on work detail
or if she can get a job. She
was denied a job, so that proved that
she was trying to do that. But the
point was she would have been able to
leave.
Literally, Ghislaine Maxwell is potentially able to leave
prison. I mean, guys, that's can you imagine
if Biden had done any of this?
The images have infuriated her victims, and rightly
so, who were already angry at her move
to the soft jail dubbed Camp Cupcake
just three years into her sentence. The decision
broke US prison rules, by the way, in
case you missed our last coverage on this,
which state that a sex offender cannot serve
time in a minimum security facility, but they
did it anyway.
That should upset you.
Now
I wanna play this clip before we get
into Tom Homan just because I'll I think
I'll play it again later if it becomes
relevant again, but
it I wanted to play it off this
because it felt really important to hear. So
the article reading about the 50 states one
Israel. Right?
This is a US politician's
daughter
telling you what she thinks about this. Now
think about the point of, Greenblatt and saying,
we don't have a a left right problem.
We have an a generation problem. This is
what he's talking about.
My dad, a Republican state senator in New
Mexico, just got back from his trip to
Israel,
which was not like a personal vacation,
by the way. It was him and a
bunch of his other Republican cronies
who got invited to Israel
for what I can only assume was just
like
a a propaganda
trip.
So, yeah, it looks like my dad and
a bunch of other just like loser politicians
from New Mexico
went
to meet with Netanyahu.
And
I I don't know what they could possibly
discuss. I mean, again, it's my dad and
a bunch of other, like, state senators and
state reps,
which, like,
how does meeting with Netanyahu
help
the local people of New Mexico?
But, yeah, I genuinely believe that Israel is,
like, paying my dad now to, like, peddle
propaganda
because he also posted this, like, super long
tweet that's, like, basically dissertation link that I'm
not even gonna I I couldn't even take
a screenshot of it and get even half
of it. Like, that would take, like, four
screenshots
to get the entire thing.
So if you wanna check it out, I
guess go to his go to his Twitter
profile. But he was basically just peddling all
this Israeli propaganda, saying that the genocide is
a lie and that, like, civilians aren't being
killed
and the IDF is doing everything they can
to, like, minimize casualties. And I'm like,
how how much are they paying my dad?
You know, like, how much is his soul?
Because it seems like he has sold his
soul to the devil and is now just
peddling Wow. Like, lies and propaganda,
which I mean, look. He's a Republican politician.
That's kind of, like, par for the course.
But it's just a little odd. Now see,
unfortunately,
that's gonna cause people to ignore her opinion
because partisanship rules today for some very small
minded people.
But what I think is important is to
recognize this is a her this is his
daughter. And and and it's clearly, in my
opinion, that was a that was an additional,
like, side point. She's talking about what she
thinks about Israel. Now that's right now, if
you're if you're paying attention, you can see
on both sides of the paradigm and those
that can see through
it are aware of what Israel's doing. Most
so much on the Republican side that it's
causing a huge issue for Republican team sport
politics players. So what she's highlighting is the
issue that she has with the what he's
doing with Israel. That is a generation awareness
of what it is and calling him out.
And then, yes, she clearly is on the
left, it seems, calling out the right. That
doesn't change, like I said, the reality of
what this I think that's important.
Odd to me that somebody who is a
state senator again, he's not even a US
senator. He's a state senator.
Got personally invited to Israel and met with
Netanyahu.
Like, what is going on here?
I'm genuinely so confused, and
I I don't know. I think there is
some, like, nefarious
stuff happening. Yeah. You think?
I just genuinely hope that
this will be the end of my dad's
political career because he
is clearly not somebody who has, like, his
constituent's
best interests in mind.
He just wants that Israeli propaganda money, I
guess.
Now, obviously, if she has enough, like, you
know,
hatred, let's say, for the the conversation or
Israel or or Republicans, you know, maybe she'll
be driven to make the point. But I
find it interesting. Like, think about what you're
talking about here. You're talking about a daughter
of of a of a per somebody's daughter
who makes the argument that he is selling
his soul for the narrative. Like, I mean,
I don't know. Like, you'd think that even
if she disagreed politically, if she thought he
was a good person, like, I I think
it screams that this has so far out
of control for them. That's why I think
so many things are happening. And I that
is the either the it is Israel's narrative
and agenda with trying to accomplish in the
world collapsing, their economy collapsing, their influence, their
narrative, they're collapsing.
And then the US government that's either the
one that's always been controlling that needs it
to continue for their agenda
getting caught, which I don't think is the
reality. I think it's what you're seeing is
that the Israeli control over US politicians is
being,
you know, called in to such a extremely,
like, cartoonish degree
because Israel is collapsing.
You know? And so at the so what
we're start I would I would argue at
some point, which is already kind of happening,
this is all my opinion, is that you're
gonna start to see people, even though they're
beholden to Israel, just start to recognize the
writing on the wall. Maybe Margitelle Green's an
example of that going like, okay. Israel's been
giving me all this money. They can do
things to me, whether just politically or something
else. But I recognize that they're losing that
influence. People are no longer you know, maybe
it's in my interest to start slightly pointing
out other things or maybe just shifting entirely.
I think we're gonna start to see that
waterfall more than you think with politicians, and
it doesn't mean we should trust politicians or
the media people to do the same thing.
How long have I been talking about that?
But it just it that you can see
this shifting. And the real point to take
away is that they have lost control. I
said that the first month after the October
7, they caused that collapse.
Important to think about. Now we're gonna come
more back to that in a second. Now
I wanted to briefly point to this because
I think it's important for us to see
the Tom Homan overlap.
And also just because, like, you know, these
are odd stories that have been circulating that
I you know, this is not just a
one focus show. I try to, you know,
encapsulate other things going on for you guys
to see in many ways that I think
connect together. You know? Now this,
Gunther Eagleman, breaking. Tom Holland just revealed that
oh, I'm sorry. This was actually first, and
then I'm gonna get into the story. This
was the story that you've seen, the $50,000.
This is just funny to me. He says,
Tom Holland just revealed that 2,000,000 illegal aliens
are no longer in America or in
America.
Okay. Do they just vanish?
He says 1,600,000
have self deported.
Oh, really? And I just handed over 400,000.
Guys, this is so stupid to me. Now
look, we can see that they have they
you know, what if you think
that arbitrarily removing people with no process
regard you know, ignoring their constitutional rights is
somehow a success, then, yeah, then they've succeeded.
Because they have shuffled a ton of people,
most of which are not criminals,
many of which are and I think even
borderline, most of which are actually here legally,
have been removed from this country, some of
which did self deport. But are we pretending
that the numbers that we just saw, that
they showed you, they're so the the idea
that you that they're gonna even claim that
ICE has specifically handled 400,000
of these, but on top of that, that
they just claimed that this is the real
kicker.
1,600,000
people, they claim, have all just self deported
in this process, in between which they were
being accused and called out for not being
able to achieve this at.
When they made the claim, and this is
something Melnick also pointed out, of 2,000,000 illegal
aliens, that was proven to be false when
he said it. No. Yes. It was a
lot. It was somewhere like 1,000,000 something. The
point nonetheless is that he was using that
number. It wasn't accurate. Now it's come around
to him saying,
what is that? What is that? 75%?
They did they did it for us.
Now what you could argue is that that
didn't happen, and they weren't even here to
begin with, and this was a self fulfilling
problem. You could make the narrative and then
say they were gone and make it look
like we did something. I mean, guys, I
just want you to think about this. Because
for me, I feel like that's deliberately dishonest
to make it look like they had it
some kind of success, and the timing of
it, I think, is relevant.
Like, they're right now desperate for some kind
of a win because their own team is
seeing through them.
I mean, I don't know.
Trying to give a good analogy.
They're seeing through them, and it's just trans
it's embarrassing.
Anyway, side point, we'll come back to this,
and we'll talk on, some more immigration stuff
coming up into their show.
This, I just think, is very relevant. Now
I'm actually just gonna briefly go over this.
I'm not even gonna get into I mean,
I I it's only first couple paragraphs, but
this is an interesting story to me. Because
of what because of,
like, removing partisanship.
What they're claiming
I mean, it's it's who knows if they're
put it this way. The way that they
present the story shows you they're being dishonest.
Like, at at core ways, like, there's it
just doesn't add up, but that doesn't mean
that they're necessarily the other side. Like, let's
just say it's possible that part there's truth
from both sides.
But what it shows you is that there's
clearly an effort to sort of ignore the
story as opposed to really engage with the
data. Tom Homan was investigated for accepting $50,000
from undercover FBI agents. Trump's DOJ shut it
down.
Now the basic reality here is that he
was caught. He was recorded
doing this and accepted it.
Now you could argue that's all manufactured,
but I guarantee this is gonna flesh out
more. The reality is that they then
they, you know, got the information as, yes,
the other team, if you look at it
that way,
and got the information.
And right before the election,
right, when that could have been released, and
that could have been a huge even if
there was no criminal issue, that could have
been used to collapse or at least,
hopefully, destroy Trump's campaign. Right? But they didn't
do that. That would be the most obviously
political motivation. So the like, ignoring the possibility
for actual outcome, action, accountability, instead throwing it
out there to win an election. Right? They
didn't do that.
Instead, they waited and they said, we're gonna
we're gonna wait to let's to hopefully allow
him to
carry out his side of it. So we
give him $50,000 for a certain thing, and
then if he does that thing, well, we
got him. Right? That's the real crime.
Okay. Then Trump got into power, and they
shut it down. And then he sort of
lied about it more than once, which is
what they tend to do. Now they're actually
saying this was a setup. Right? Which is
what it seems like, that they kind of
used like, it was a staying operation. That
doesn't mean he didn't quit a crime. Right?
But now they're claiming he didn't even take
the money. But are you really gonna tell
me that the argument is that it was
politically motivated to not do something?
Like, think about how insane how just completely
backward that is. Now what this is what
it says in the article. In an undercover
operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan.
Now the White House borders are accepting $50,000
in cash after indicating he would help the
agents
who were posing as business executives
win government contracts in the second Trump administration,
according to multiple people familiar with the probe
and internal documents reviewed. Now, guys, there's examples
of this already happening.
Homan already got called out for playing a
fast and loose with people he knew in
this field benefiting basically, give contracts had gone
to people that he would benefit from involved
with this border operation. That's not that's a
separate story.
So the idea that they would do this
in order that you can see this happening,
like, prominently throughout their administration right now, per
self,
you know,
what is it? Not a granddad. You know,
you're you're basically profiting off the actions you
take in the political sense. That's a crime.
Now the left does it too. Let's be
real. So same with insider trading. It's not
some partisan thing, but this is pretty obvious.
And that they would do it is also
pretty obvious. So now it says the FBI,
the justice department plan to wait to see
whether he would deliver on a single edged
promise once he became the nation's top immigration
official.
But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Trump
became president. That's also telling to me. Why?
Because they didn't shut it down.
It just could've sat there. It didn't go
away. And it says, but the case indefinitely
stalled.
According to six different sources familiar on the
matter, in recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed
the investigation, like, recently.
What's the what's the delay for? And it
says in this they only ended up just
stopping it after the FBI director, Kash Patel,
requested a status update. That means it was
hanging there. If this was some obvious manipulation,
they would have dumped it right away, but
it was hanging there and hanging there to
the point to where Kash said, hey. What
are we doing with this? And I said,
shut it down. So he shut it down
because he's a mindless follower like all the
rest of the people they pick for this
cabinet. It says it's unclear that what reasons
the FBI justice department officials gave for shutting
it down, but a Trump justice department appointee
called it the case a deep state probe,
Literally pretending like they were just, you know,
going after your deep state was going after
him,
but then didn't do anything. Like, can you
wreck can you really make sense of the
fact that they the deep state would allow
the t the people they were fighting to
see this through?
I mean, guys, that's just poor logic. Like,
doesn't make sense.
Or they're the most incompetent
you know? I I wouldn't even call that.
I mean, I I'm I'm not even gonna
make a joke about it. I think this
speaks for itself. So the only a few
things could happen here. Either he didn't take
the money, which is why they've now altered
the story. In the beginning, this is what's
so funny about it, they didn't say that.
Now as of today or yesterday, they're now
claiming he didn't even take the money.
Why? Because that's the only way out of
this. You pretend that they're lying about that
part even though it's actually recorded and claim
that he didn't do it. Therefore, it's all
made up. Well, then what's the story about?
Like, what what are we even talking about?
Why was there investigation, and why was it
staying open? You see my point, guys? This
speaks for itself.
So this will flush out. I promise you.
This will there more will come about this.
We'll wait and see. White House quickly changes
its tune, and that we I'll just quickly
the point was simply that now they're saying,
didn't even take the money. That's what I
was just saying. I mean, to me, this
just speaks to the manipulation of all of
these type of people,
insider trading, profiting off their own contracts.
Yeah. It's just everywhere you look, guys. The
revolving door of how they leave government, it's
what they do. So the idea that he
wouldn't do that seems shockingly laugh out loud.
But then why they wouldn't have exposed that?
Who knows? Maybe those people involved were actually
not trying to do it for political reasons.
Not to say that Biden wouldn't have been
Kamala in the team. I guarantee if I
mean, that'd be my opinion. Anyway, it's too
much to the reality of it, I think,
speaks for itself. It's interesting, though. Now on
a Tylenol autism point, I'm not gonna go
into this deep today. I'm just gonna plant
this in your mind because I'm everyone's talking
about it. But I want you to know
I see this, and I'm real I wanna
wait to see this flush out a little
bit. I honestly couldn't believe this. This morning,
I was on and wake up, and we
were talking about it. I wasn't aware that
I wasn't aware that they had actually come
out and, like, made this case. I had
heard the rumblings, and I kinda thought, how
is that even possible? With everything else they've
done, with the, you know, vaccination direction, with
I mean, all the things, they're they're literally
spitting in your eye. They're they're doing the
opposite of what they said and then telling
you you're winning.
Now it's not everything. There's examples he did
things that I think are good. I may
I've called them out in in many different
examples. But by and large, these actions, whether
it's RFK's choice or not, whether it's blackmail
or not, is the opposite direction.
So now when Trump comes out, makes unproven
link between autism and Tylenol,
and just recently claims we solved the autism
problem,
I mean, I just it's just one too
many at this point. I don't know how
this can ever there I if there's anybody
in a Maha team that still acts like
this makes sense, then they were never on
your side.
It says doctors in The US will soon
be advised not to prescribe the pain reliever
Tylenol to pregnant women, US president Donald Trump
said, citing a disputed link between drugs and
autism. Now maybe they come out with more
and connect it to vaccines too or whatever
else you think is the reality. But I
just think that's insane to me. Like, you're
you're using the momentum of, you know, insinuating
you're gonna call out autism. So you get
all the people that are, you know, already
assuming what you're gonna do, and then you
don't do that. It's happened many times. It
really upsets me because of how clear this
is. Now I don't I haven't gotten into
this in-depth. I don't know what Del Bigtree,
for example, is saying. I'd be interested to
find out because this should upset him. Truth
is that you put a lot of work
into vaxxed and that whole thing. And, ultimately,
that was one of the no. That was
the main conclusion
that they was causing autism. And yet they
got you got denied. You got gaslit and
lied to, but and here we are. So
we will come back on this depending on
how much more they push into this and
what RFK Jr says about it, but this
seems to be preliminary at this point. But
I honestly can't believe they're even flirting with
this direction.
Of course, because you know how clear it
is. This is just alien abator making a
joke about it. CDC immunization schedule in utero
to twelve months. Nineteen eighty six, which is,
in my opinion, still too many at that
point. Five shots. 2,024,
you count.
My god. That's still the case to this
day, by the way. And regardless of the
different deviations,
autism, it's Tylenol, though. It's making a joke.
Right?
Okay.
So let's get into some other overlapping health
points.
This one, as you know, is something that
really does worry me quite a bit.
I guess kind of the intersection between, like,
the the biodigital convergence,
which is what they're all telling you we're
going through right now. From Klaus Schwab to,
at this point, you know, the highest levels
of power.
So that, you know, whether it's nanotech or
or smart dust or any overlap or AI
created viruses,
the biological digital overlap is a very concerning
topic for me, and I think it should
be for all of us. So this is
09/05/2023.
Now, again, the real point is about gain
of function, right, and what that represents,
all the important information that we gained and
what we knew. You know? And now the
the way the way that that really helps
us understand how a lot of things and
the problems in the world have come about.
And whether you think that's the creation of
viruses or just the fact that they're experimenting
with god knows what for what kind of
outcome, the point is that they're not doing
so for your interest.
Now,
maybe even and in fact, I was gonna
grab that.
Perfect.
I wanna include this article because it's just
I I still can't believe that there's I
mean, I and I see people that I
think are honest. I'd like to think I
think I know are honest, who still don't
see through these kind of manipulations.
Gain of function head fake was the was
the show we did, not May 9.
Read the executive order like I said before.
It's it's very clear. Of course, they want
you to think that we're ending in a
function. That's how it was framed by so
many people. But if you read the actual
document, like like RFK Jr and self amplifying
shots, No. They're not ending mRNA. They're, in
fact, focusing more on self amplifying. And mRNA
is gonna continue in every other category. It
was listed right on his press release.
In this case, Dana functioned. They're gonna end
the dangerous versions, and they made it clear
they were gonna be the world leaders and
the ones that they wanted to continue. I'm
not even I'm, like, I'm only paraphrasing because
I can't remember the exact sentence, but that's
exactly what they said. That's why it was
a head fake. So on that note in
general, I think this is I mean, I
think it's
two twofold. I think that they are continuing
just the power structures in a function in
in its original form, but this takes it
to a whole new level. And it very
well could be that this was the old
the the point.
The the versions they wanna continue could be
AI related.
Scientists grapple with risk of artificial intelligence created
pandemics.
Now this is twofold, again, as as well.
This is about the average person
and potentially even using your cell phone and,
you know, GROC or chat GPT to, like,
to bait to
on you know, in a digital sense, literally
be able to work out creating a pandemic
virus.
The other side of it, which is really
my big focus,
is, I think they called it BDTs.
We'll get to it. It's it is the
industry version of it, which is really my
only real con my big concern is that
we're talking about and I I think tend
you tend to point to the average person.
I do think there's reasons for that. You
know, you on your phone out there, I
think it's gonna come back to censorship, control
of information,
surveillance because that's now everywhere. Now everyone can
make the viruses. Now we have to surveil
everything. Medical precrime, I think that's part of
it. But the real issue to me is
about the in
government, you know, in, the industry elements of
being able to just use gain of function
with AI, which makes it exponentially
worse.
And so I think that's the real issue.
You'll see what I
mean. It says in June, a group of
scientists at Harvard University and the and MIT
and MIT released details
of an experiment that will send shivers down
the spine of everyone who lived through COVID
nineteen pandemic
To test the dangers of the latest artificial
intelligence models, like ChatGPT
four, they gave three groups of students, all
without life science training,
an hour to see whether they could use
chatbots
to help them create a new deadly outbreak.
Within the time allowed, the chatbots hopefully helpfully
informed the students of four possible pandemic candidates,
such as smallpox,
explained how pathogens can be synthesized from a
genome sequence and linked to specific protocols, and
pointed to companies that might create custom DNA
sequences without first screening for suspect orders.
So all of that feels like it's been
you know, what the the image that's being
suggested is we can't allow average people to
just use a,
an AI model or AI, you know, chatbot
to create or learn how to make bad
things.
Well, you realize that's how the Internet already
works. Right? Like, not in the same way,
but that's the argument would be the same
for why you can't allow that any information
to exist online.
Now I'm not saying that's what this is,
like, being created, but it's being framed maybe
by in an honest way by people writing
about it, but I think that's what the
intention will be. That's my opinion.
In, in one part of this. Now it
says collectively, these results,
suggest that large language models, which power chat
bots like chat
Chat GPT,
will make pandemic class agents
widely accessible as soon as they are credibly
identified,
even to people with little or no laboratory
training. You see my point? So that kind
of, like, lingering threat will be used
and even even illogically so for some people
to to, you know, shut down our ability
to access certain information. Maybe
at first,
new, you know, information, but then it will
broaden out to science. You know, you can't
look at these studies because, like, you see
where this goes.
Even if it's rational.
It says, fortunately,
a chat, and this is the preprint. We'll
point that in a second.
Large language models to dual use biotechnology.
It says, fortunately, a chatbot can't actually walk
you through the creation of a homemade pandemic
just
yet. Some experts are highly skeptical that the
the risk of AI assisted pandemics is near,
while others think AI will aid early
career researchers,
not novice members of the public.
He says, but given the stunning recent speed
of AI progress, scientists are still unnerved.
He says, quote, if you look where we
were six months ago and look where we
are today, we're already in a different world.
A global health expert from Georgetown University now
involved in efforts to contain the risk. This
to contain this risk.
Like, so they're literally think tank minded now
about how we're gonna stop average people from
being able to have access. Like, again, I
I think this I'm gonna keep stressing it,
but I I think that's very clear. Right?
Like, that's that will be another, like,
you know, like hate speech censorship kind of
idea or more so like a,
I don't know. Like like, they make the
nuclear technology overlap. Like, the idea that here's
a threat. You can't not everyone should be
able to see this, and we have to
control that threat. It says at least in
The US and UK, the risky the risky
convergence of AI and bioscience,
which is what they're all pushing for, by
the way, has begun begun to grab the
attention of policymakers and politicians.
In my opinion, not because they actually care,
but because they see that people are caring
and they gotta keep that narrative going. And
they'll use that to drive in what they
want anyway, which is what politicians have done
since I've been alive.
It says in July, Dario Amadi, chief executive
of AI firm Anthropic,
told a US Senate Technology Subcommittee that there
is a substantial
risk, that in two to three years, a
chatbot will be able to walk users through
every step needed to create a bioweapon.
This could greatly widen the range of actors
with a technical capability
to conduct a large scale biological attack,
he says, adding that Anthropic has been trying
to make sure its own AI models do
not help out potential bioterrorists. So there's two
points in that. Okay.
So one is, now if this becomes the
reality, now you created an argument, a narrative
in which
a random Iranian could have just made it
on his phone and carried out a random
attack. And then, you know, too bad too
bad it was a, you know, CIA upfront
that we don't you know, like, you could
see how this could be abused in that
way or vice versa. Right? It could be
something they frame as here, but it was
done by, you know, any way which go.
But I think I was gonna say, any
way it goes, it it could go either
way. But I think we all
if you're paying attention, the history is very
one-sided about what entities have created things like
this or used these kind of narratives or
carried out regime changes secretly. The US government
in Israel and The UK are like the
chief elements. I mean, The UK almost more
than anybody, if you go back far enough,
have have been at I mean, they're leading
the world.
So we have to think about that when
we think about who will use things like
this going forward. You wanna talk about Iran?
Show me an example of them ever doing
something like that. Not to say they haven't,
but I don't have the evidence for it.
So he's saying again,
the the the technical capability of being able
to
conduct a large scale attack. I mean, first
of all, you're talking about doing so digitally
on your phone. And then how in the
world that then becomes you know, you were
you were getting text directions on how to
roll that into something. I mean, this to
me, that seems cartoonishly unlikely.
But possible, sure.
He says adding that they have been trying
to make sure their models don't help that.
So maybe in a way you even agree
with, he's saying we're building our AI that
selectively makes sure certain information is not handed
over. How else do you read that? It
says two US senators have also re recently
demanded the country's government accountability office to investigate,
among other things, the risk that AI could
allow the creation of biological weapons, citing this
study. Now I'm also not saying that necessarily
that I'd like, I'm demanding that everyone have
access to, you know, be able to make
pandemics. I mean, the point is about the
way the flow of information or the argument
that there's a dangerous piece of information
has always been used by, in particular, this
government to shut down your access to information
in general.
It is not just well known large language
models based chatbots like ChatGPT that have scientists
worried. There's another class of software tool, and
this is what I'm talking about, called biological
design tools, BDTs,
which use AI to help scientists
design new proteins
or other biological agents.
Since we're even mentioning that, we might as
well
point out this article. Same kind of idea.
Right?
Gain of functions, newest brain virus.
Genetically engineered proteins to control
everything.
That's the and these both are peer reviewed
science. One's MIT, one's the Rockefeller University.
Pretty easy to see. The reality
is that these are the kind of people
I'm talking about, what I'm worried about.
Scientists, industry people
using these tools to create continue their gain
of function experiments, which is, by the way,
already happening.
While chatbots could in theory help the public,
like, are you even just reading this? It
feels almost like
deliberately,
you
know, free the the the random people in
the world. Like, that's the big threat. Like,
that's this way it starts.
In theory, the random people but, like, there's
so many roadblocks and hurdles to that even
being possible. It seems like you bury the
lead, doesn't it? And not even calling it
out. I'm just saying that's what it feels
like to me. It says, while chatbots could,
in theory, help public unleash known pathogens like
smallpox,
the danger of these BDTs
is that they allow trained researchers to create
new pathogens.
You know, the ones with the scientific know
how in the labs to actually make it
happen. Perhaps both highly transmissible and virulent.
Whatever you think about the reality, this is
the point is about how these things can
be used. There's they're they are doing something
out there. Another possibility is that BDTs could
you be used to disguise dangerous agents. I
thought that was interesting. So they aren't picked
up by existing expert controls
or
using this to create something that gives you
the hallmarks of something else. You know, sort
of a la vault seven.
It's ex same you could argue exactly the
same thing. Using ways to you know, literally
using these large language models to be able
to create something that would look like it's
from somewhere else.
It's easy to point out.
And it says humanity might face the threat
of pathogens substantially worse than anything nature might
create.
Isn't that the argument for why none of
this should be allowed by anybody?
Yeah. It's what the it's what the Trump
administration used to make you think they were
ending it, but they were focusing on stuff
like this. Because they know we don't like
this because it's an obvious argument. We shouldn't
allow this. This is like, you know, flipping
a coin on ending the human species.
Humanity might face the threat of pathogens substantially
worse than ending nature might create. According to
the recent preprint by Oxford University, biosecurity researcher
Jonas Sandbrink, which maps out the dangers from
both types of bio AI tool.
An average person does not have the necessary
lab know know how, he says. That takes
several years to even acquire,
to translate AI generated insights and designs into
real in the real world. Exactly. It's it's
largely it seems very, very unlikely.
It says in May, a group of academics
and think tank experts chaired by Daiboule met
on the shores of Lake Como in Italy
to come up with solutions to this emerging
threat. They want powerful large language models and
BDTs to be evaluated by specialized bioscience
working groups, in particular to analyze the training
data that feeds into these models.
If tech firms removed
a tiny sliver of the scientific literature from
their training data, key papers in virology for
example,
This would suffice, quote, to eliminate nearly all
the risks. By denying chatbots critical information, clear
critical knowledge concludes
the preprint.
Okay. Clearly, I'm sure I'm sure you can
see the problem here. Alright. So now you're
creating a precedent
for people making these from going, well, we'll
just shave off that little important piece of
information. So you ask for the full picture
and it gives you the full picture, but
it doesn't even realize that it's
leaving out step three of step one through
10. Right? So what happens then? You think
well, I mean, you could argue even in
the realm of somebody doing something like they're
talking about could cause a major disaster, I
would think. But overall, I think it's about
setting the precedent for doing that in any
context. So now you're gonna get information. Well,
you know, as we see the world going
in the direction of being basically everyone asking
chatbots for everything,
god forbid, it's where it seems to be
going. And then eventually gets to the point
to where that's just every what they're using.
And then everyone's going off partial information without
even knowing it. Like, so you could argue
this could be done for government national security
points. Well, let's just shave off that point
so they couldn't actually do it. You know,
you wanna three d print this x y,
this gun, this old. You think you can
do it, but guess what? You don't even
know anymore because they've shaved off. You get
you can cultivate
information this way
by denying critical knowledge.
I find that wild. I almost find that
more important than the first part of it.
They're they're setting the precedent for limited information
being presented as the full picture to keep
you safe.
Maybe I'm making too much of it, but
I think this is really important.
And it says,
one problem, however, is that
it that that it's one problem, however, is
that it's the tech giants, not scientists themselves,
that get to decide how to train their
models.
Right. So you have people like Palantir
making these decisions.
So the argument, whether it's about pathogens or
not, it these are people that are not
making interest based on the interest of society
or the interest of The United States. They're
may they're I mean, who knows what they're
really driving for, but you can literally see
maybe if they think they're doing that, you
could prove that it's not. I'm just saying
that because I can't speak to their intentions,
but their actions are not in the interest
of The United States. They're not in the
interest unless you think that's the government, which
it's not.
And it says Anthropic, creator of the AI
assistant Claude, has taken a keen interest in
these risks. OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, has said
it's consulted biorex experts when training its most
recent model. So it's already happening. But so
far, there's no independent outside body checking the
tech giant's work. Okay. So think about this.
You've got these massive platforms that are now
influencing
massive amounts of opinion with these chatbots who
nobody's even checking whether they're even making sure
information's accurate, and even then that we'd seem
to be able to debate
basic fundamental verifiable facts based on left right
partisanship.
I mean, get ready for where this is
going. I'm not sure I mean, this is
just we are being driven into a schizophrenic
partisan world.
Now it says,
a culture of openness in science too will
potentially hamper any attempts to reign in these
risks. See, that's my point. Then broadening this
out into just like scientific discovery needs to
be, you know, tapered down, and we only
let you see what might help you.
Think about think about during COVID nineteen if
we didn't have full access to the studies
being released. Remember, during the middle of it,
they tried to stop you. They shut you
down from having access to the data from
The UK, from The United
States. This is where it's going.
Now here is the study itself first from,
this is arxiv.org.
Look. Can large language models democratize
access to dual use technology?
Large language models, LLMs, such as those embedded
in chatbots are
accelerating and democratizing
research by providing comprehensible information and expertise from
many different fields. However, these models may also
confer easy access to dual use technology capabilities
of inflicting great harm. I mean, it's worth
asking yourself whether the it it might be
in the interest of Israel or The United
States to allow this to be able to
be made so they could then use that
to argue there's a threat that needs to
be acted upon.
It may sound crazy to some people, but
if you're paying attention, you know it's not.
To evaluate this risk, the safeguarding the few
the safeguarding the future course at MIT,
tasked nonscientist students with investigating whether these could
we we already, you know, read that out
to make something dangerous. In one hour, the
chatbot suggested they could, and it says,
and this was interesting, explained how they could
be generated from synthetic DNA using reverse type
genetics, supplied the names of DNA synthesis companies
unlikely to screen orders, identified detailed protocols on
how to troubleshoot them, and recommended that anyone
lacking the skills to perform reverse gen
engage a core facility or contact research organizations.
So the way that it did that, I
mean, it's it's you're, you know, training them
how to evade the law and not get
caught or how to evade the, you know,
companies that won't screen you. You know, it
seems like it's creating an a a way
to look like they need to censor this
way the access to information in general, which
is what they all genuinely argue if you
actually listen to left and right. Collectively, these
results suggest that LOMs will make pandemic class
agents widely accessible as soon as they reach
organization. I mean, we already read most of
it. They verify with screening DNA generated by
synthesis providers or used by contact research organizations
and robotic cloud laboratories to engineer organisms or
viruses.
Now the the idea that, you know, shutting
down parts of
the Internet information,
I mean, that might sound familiar
because this is something that Trump argued for
a different reason.
And this was, I believe, ISIS was the
argument. But
my point is always is it's just a
different solution
or the same solution for different problems because
it's never really about the problem.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the internet. And we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish peep
Right. You're foolish for knowing the truth,
like usual.
Now here's the actual, you know, printed out
study you can read for yourself.
Now this is an article that takes us
to the September 17.
AI designed viruses are here and already killing
bacteria.
So this my point is that this is,
you know, clearly
already going on. And and how often, I
mean, if not always, is that the case?
Here's this new crazy thing for the future
that we're hypothetically going over and then, oops,
it already happened. Been going on for ten
years. I mean, it's it's pretty much how
this tends to work.
Now that's I'm not even saying that's what
happened here. This is just kind of like
this is not secret. This is, you know,
kind of the evolution of it. My point
overall, though, is that it's being presented in
many ways as if it's kind of like
where it's going, but it's already been going
on. It has been for a while if
you just dig into it barely. A research
team in California says it used AI to
propose
new genetic codes for viruses
and managed to get several of these viruses
to replicate and kill bacteria.
So right on the surface, we're already seeing
them use artificial intelligence to create viruses.
How is that not the exact same thing?
Well, the answer is it is. It's already
it's gain a function by a different name,
by a different practice. You're creating things and
then altering them to gain or lessen no.
Gain or mine, gain or what is it?
It's gain a function and not is it
it's not minus.
There's another term for it the other way
where you can take something away. The point
is that this is what they're doing.
And this is what largely Republicans seem to
have a big issue with, and yet it's
happening anyway. The scientists based at Stanford University
and the nonprofit ARC Institute, both in Palo
Alto, say the germs with AI written DNA
represent the, quote, first generative design of complete
genomes.
The work described in the preprint has the
potential to create new treatments and accelerate research
into artificially
genet engineered cells. It is also an,
quote, impressive first step toward
AI designed life forms.
That's where they're going. I'm telling you. They're
they're not even hiding at this point. See
Jeff, Bokeh, a, Sez Jeff Bokeh, a biologist
at NYU Langdon
Langan Health, who was provided an advanced copy
of the paper.
Bokeh says, and the AI's performance was surprisingly
good and that its ideas were unexpected.
Quote, they saw viruses with new genes, which
with truncated genes and even different gene orders
and arrangements.
Yeah. So kinda make you should kinda make
you wonder whether or not all of this
that went on during COVID nineteen was all
about somehow working towards this outcome or many
different experimental outcomes.
Jessica Rowe's PhD interview,
hashtag block gate and the unknown risks of
truncated spike proteins.
Now I'm telling you guys, there's a I
mean, I don't need to convince you. I'm
pretty sure most of you already know how
clear this is connected,
but I just think it's interesting the way
you overly can see that all of these
different things, they gained a lot from whatever
happened.
You could call it all accidents. They used
it anyway, but I you could pretty much
prove that they knew what they were doing.
The California
researchers chemically printed 302
of the genome designs as DNA strands and
then mixed those with e coli bacteria.
Then that that led to a profound AI
is here moment when one night, the scientists
saw plaques of dead bacteria in their petri
dishes. They later took microscope pictures of the
tiny viral particles, which look like fuzzy dots.
Quote, that was pretty striking, just actually seeing,
like, this AI generated sphere,
says Brian High, who leads the lab at
the ARC Institute where the work was carried
out.
Says people are betting AI will transform biology.
Right? That we'll
alter human evolution. That we will, you know,
convert that change the human species. I mean,
this is all the all the same points.
Alter evolution, that's the 2022 document from The
United States. Alter, alter the species, that's the
biodiesel convergence document from Canada.
Klaus Schwab is saying very similar things. I
mean, this is where they're all aiming.
Whether it's AI or just technology, that's what
they're talking about.
Computer designed viruses could also find commercial uses,
he writes. For instance, doctors have sometimes tried
FAINS therapy
to treat patients with serious bacterial infections. Similar
tests are underway to cure cabbage cabbage of
black rot also also causes bacteria. Yes. Can
they use it for positive things? Sure. Always
the case. Neuralink can do positive things. It
can also do a lot of bad things.
The point is that this is always the
case.
At least, the framing is like, this is
being done to save everybody when it rarely
ends up that way.
There
is definitely a lot of potential for this
technology, says Samuel King, the student who spearheaded
the project. He knows that most gene therapy,
because that is what we're still talking about,
uses viruses to shuttle genes into patients' bodies
and AI might develop more effective
ones. Come out. Gene therapy was the COVID
shot. It still is. There's just no denying
that. Even industry experts made that same point.
The Stanford researchers say that purposely
they purposely haven't taught their AI about viruses
that can infect people.
But this type of technology does create the
risk that other scientists, out of curiosity, good
intentions, or malice,
could turn the methods on human pathogens,
exploring new dimensions of lethality.
So there you go. M I MIT Technology
Review. Yeah. Should they want to, which we
know they will, use this in this is
the new game function.
It's already happening.
Viral enhancement research is what it's called, and
that's the same synonym you can use for
gain of function, guys.
That's just that that's it's very transparent
to where we are.
Here's an article from Newsweek.
AI creates bacteria killing viruses. Extreme caution, Warren's
genome pioneer. This is just the same conversation.
One point I wanna show you, it says
one area where I urge extreme caution is
antiviral enhancement research, especially when it's random so
you don't know what you're getting.
If someone did this with smallpox or anthrax,
I would have great concerns. He's literally referencing
this AI created system and what they did
in California.
So, yes, it could go that way. Maybe
it already has. I argue the government's been
doing this longer than we realize.
Also include this. We did an interview with
George Webb where he talked about AI created
drugs.
This is where it's been going.
Now Independent Medical Alliance,
DNA inside COVID shots. Independent scientists science confirms
what regulators ignore. Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose,
Brian Cole.
I mean, McKernan and I point out in
particular for the specific conversation of DNA contamination.
And what's crazy to me is how much
how little attention this stuff gets even from
the Republicans who've been calling it out forever.
Why? Because I think it right now feels
like you're counter signaling the leader when you
point out the problems of the shot they're
still promoting. Right?
Now let's not forget this overlap.
The DNA
focused
weapons, which is the dual use technology. It's
the same point. It can be used to
help. It can be used to hurt. So
all I'm saying, especially when actually we'll read
this first,
is that we can see this direction. And
they're now building with AI. It could be
it's it's important to see how the
limitless direction. But now we also include this
with the idea of your health data,
right, which we talked about in this show.
Trump's new big tech led private health tracking
system. All the so totally not deep state,
totally not globalist people that are packed to
the top of the you know, all the
so tech big tech social
media companies, Silicon Valley, all the people that
Jones would have told you were the bad
guys until they joined with Donald Trump. All
the point is they're all using your the
argument was we're gonna make sure that they
show you the data they have. Oh, okay.
We're winning. Right? Except all that really does
is enshrine the reality that they're allowed to
take off your data without your knowledge as
long as they show you what they have.
How about we just say, no, they're not
allowed to take my data. Isn't that what
the original point was? Well, here we are
again.
HHS announces crackdown
on health blocking.
No. Not crackdown on them siphoning off all
of your personal information in many ways that
aren't legal. No. No. We're gonna say they
have to make sure they show you. And
how in the world are we gonna know
for sure? So we're gonna now trust that
Palantir is honest about what they have?
Seems like a good bet.
It says, unblocking the flow of health information
is critical to unleashing health IT innovation. Oh,
okay. So it's about us? No. No. No.
It's about innovation in your field and transferring
our health care ecosystem. So what they're saying
is our access to your data is important
to this per outcome.
That's, of course, that's Jim O'Neil. Miss mister
I mean, here.
Jim O'Neil,
the
longevity
expert.
Here, I'll grab this one too since that's
not as clear in the title.
This is Jim O'Neil.
The longevity enthusiast. Oh, come on.
Even this platform,
killing me. For the podcast, it was already
blocked by a paywall, even though it wasn't
the first time I read it. Well, good
thing everyone's doing archives today. There you go.
Look how fast that was. Use archive for
everything. Save it so somebody else can access
it. Meet Jim O'Neil, the longevity enthusiast who
is now RFK Jr's right hand man. He
is a transhumanist.
Watch my show. It's very clear.
And the problem is that these people are
all now packed into the same, you know,
the RFK's team.
And so that's him right there going unblocking
it all. These pea and the reality if
you watch the show is that they are
ecstatic. The people like the Curtis Yarvin philosophy
team, you know, the the Palantir type carpentils
and all the Andresans.
They are super excited because this guy's gonna
be focusing on the stuff they want. It's
not gonna benefit the average person. It's about
billionaires living longer.
It says patients must have unfettered access to
their health information. Okay. Do you not realize
that we already do? It's your health data.
First of all, you know what's going on
with your health. Are you suggesting that they
have secret insight on what your what what's
going on with you that they somehow got
without your knowledge? And then now they're required
to give back to you? Does that stop
the practice of them getting your secret information?
No. No. It doesn't. They can keep siphoning
it however they want as long as they
show it to you. So this is a
win?
It's just it's it's in the inversion of
everything today, guys. It's insane.
How about they just stop doing that? Like,
the the information that you might gain from
going to your doctor is for you, not
for everybody else to have access to. Should
you it's unless you want that. It says
for patients and innovators.
Literally framed as patients
and innovators
as if that's the same category. If you
are a patient who is experiencing information blocking
in you or your family, how would you
even know? How do you know if they're
not giving you the full picture of what
they have on you? What if they say
we don't have anything? How do you know
they're lying?
And it says,
an innovator
trying to improve health care or costs.
So if you're one of those things, if
you're an average person trying to get access
or you're an innovator trying to improve even
though that's the person blocking your access
or have otherwise co co
observed information blocking,
you should report it.
That's all it says. So literally, the people,
the innovators, the ones that they need, they're
saying,
here's an innovator
trying to make things using your health data.
Report to us that you're being blocked from
data.
So how does that make sense?
That's my data. Why would an innovator be
blocked for because it's my data. So now
they're gonna make sure the innovator has access
to your data. See, this has nothing to
do with you. They're including you to make
it seem like we're we're winning, when in
reality, they're enshrining the problem.
Continuing.
It's frustrating.
So going forward,
playing this. Right? So now that they have
access to all your personal data, which by
the way, let's not forget, that includes Israel
because of the Israel's unique partnership in AI
with The United States,
it's it's it's amazing how little attention that
gets. You could look it up to the
details included. Israel has access to every data
point that you have, that your government has
on you because they have an overlapping interest
in the AI agenda, which is using your
personal data to train their models right now.
It's not a secret.
So with all of that data, including all
of your personal genetic material, all of the
information that every agency has on you,
this is what's possible at least in one
small alarming vein of this conversation.
To be clear, I think one of the
things we're talking about here is that there
are now weapons under development and developed that
are designed to target specific people.
That that's what this is,
where you you can actually take someone's DNA,
take, you know, their their medical profile, and
you can target a biological weapon that will
that will kill that person or take them
off the battlefield or make them inoperable.
So you can't have a discussion about this
without talking about privacy,
and and commercial
data in the protection of commercial data because
expectations of privacy have degraded over the last
twenty years. You know, young folks actually have
very little expectation of privacy. That's what the
polling and the the data show.
And and people will very rapidly spit into
a cup and send it into '23 and
Me and get really interesting data about their
background. Yeah. Yeah. And remember that that show
it turned out to be a complete you
know, you relied to about how that would
work. It was shared with other people, including
governments. And the reality is it was part
of a larger
program. But why do you think that's the
case? Because people have been worn down. They've
been manipulated into thinking that they don't have
a choice or it's already done or why
it is well because they already have everything.
Or just because they've been manipulating the thinking
their privacy is irrelevant if it contradicts, you
know, bumps up against public safety or whatever.
It's not the it's it's regardless of whether
people are okay with it, it doesn't change
the reality of your constitutional rights. And guess
what? Their DNA is now owned by a
private company and can be sold off without
very with very little,
intellectual property protection or or privacy protection. And
we don't have
legal and regulatory regimes to deal with that.
So,
we have to have an open and public
discussion, and this is gonna have to be
a political discussion,
about what does
the protection of health care information, DNA information,
and your data look like because that, data
is actually gonna be procured
and collected by our adversaries for the development
of these systems. Or your government, about you.
It's always framed as the evil doer bad
guy. And, usually, the argument is that's where
we have to do it first to stop
them. Right? That's the argument of gain of
function in its in its entirety, which is
so embarrassingly stupid that we need to make
something that's never existed anywhere in a lab
somewhere that nobody else could reproduce outside of
a miracle one in a billion miracle by
doing the exact same thing secretly,
and we're gonna make a a vaccine for
that just in case they make the same
thing, which is not gonna happen ever. And
then, oopsie, it got out. Good thing we'd
have this, but we don't use it. You
know, it's it's just it's it's a lie,
guys. It is a experts have already that
cat's out of the bag.
This is the same problem.
Listen. And for the podcast, Aspen Security Forum,
speaking about this reality.
Now let's moving this over into another part
of this part of the con another part
of this conversation. So the first kind of
what we just highlighted
is just where this is going and how
they are utilizing your personal data that they've,
you know,
illegally taken.
We also have the larger sort of apparatus
that has allowed this.
And this comes down to what Israel has
created in this country and that your government
is involved within the same, but ultimately it
really comes down to the larger plan. As
Whitney writes here, my my original report,
coauthored with Jeremy Lofredo in 2020, that details
how Palantir was a rebranded total information awareness,
TIA,
was also a criticism of Palantir's role in
the COVID era operation Warp Speed. Key figures
tied to Palantir or its cofounders are now
found in extremely important
post throughout the government.
Understanding Palantir's ambitions to end privacy, install precrime,
they call it predictive policing, and apply the
same methodology to health care has never been
more important.
So what I was just highlighting, guys, this
is where this goes. Here's a clip for
of Whitney talking about Palantir in general and
where this goes.
Well,
as an example,
Palantir has been in the news. Right? He's
a cofounder of that. So how was Palantir
created? Well, there was this company
that was being run or not company. Sorry.
It was a government,
program after nine eleven called Total Information Awareness.
It was housed within the Pentagon's DARPA office.
And the man they chose to put in
charge of that was John Poindexter,
who was the highest ranking member of the
Reagan administration to be indicted for his role
in Iran Contra,
which, again, the continuity of government stuff is
is relevant here. So,
eventually,
you know, it launches and whatever, but, people
in are are outraged by it because as
they rightly point out as they rightly pointed
out,
it would, eliminate
constitutional protections of Americans' rights, specifically the right
to privacy among other things. It was a
huge surveillance dragnet, and its goal wasn't just
to, you know, surveil everything. It was to
predict crime before it happens, predict terror attacks
before it happens. I mean, it's like minority
report Yeah. Was basically the end goal of
it.
And so after all the pushback,
they changed the name to terrorist information awareness
and try and rebrand. Oh, it's not total.
We're not gonna we are still gonna surveil
innocent Americans, but we're focusing on the terrorists.
You know? They did all this stuff to
try and rebrand it, but congress defunded it.
But in hidden in that bill, congress allowed
aspects of it to continue.
And, essentially,
I argue in in my work on Palantir
that an effort was made to privatize
large aspects of TIA
as Palantir.
Because when Alex Karp and and Peter Thiel
were were setting it up, they went to
John Poindexter through this guy named Richard Perle,
who was a a neo long standing NeoCon
actor with, very extensive ties also to the
state of Israel. He was, like, caught in
the seventies giving classified information to Israel's embassy
and should have gone to jail and somehow
did not,
and had a lot of ties also to
Netanyahu's first government.
And he Richard Pearl is the guy that
connected,
Teal Karp to Poindexter, and they wanted they
basically wanted to talk to Poindexter because they
wanted to recreate
total information awareness and saw him as the
godfather of modern mass surveillance.
And,
in doing so,
they basically,
you know, Peter Thiel teams up with In
Q Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm.
Alex Corp has said on record that the
intended clients of Palantir from the beginning was
the CIA.
And, you know, the CIA was their first
client for their first six years as a
company.
Their top developers went to Langley, Virginia, which
is CIA headquarters every two weeks to show
the show the CIA their project, their product
and have them tweak it to their liking.
And during that period of time,
one of the p top people at the
CIA that would have been involved in that
is this guy named Alan Wade,
who was also intimately involved with total information
awareness.
And if you look at how total information
awareness was described, its privacy protections, it's exactly
the same as the way Palantir sold their
stuff,
later on.
So there's an insane amount of overlap. And
what's crazy here is that Alan Wade, a
few years prior, had created,
a homeland security
software program that was also precrime esque and
similar to what Palantir ended up doing. It
was called Kiliad, and he teamed up with
Christine Maxwell
to do that.
So many connections.
It just blows your mind when you really
go through. And this is why people are
so, you know, aggressively against her in so
many ways. People that should otherwise, you know,
if they actually had good intentions would
happily embrace. Like, there's so many people that
are are,
angry or, like, bitch like, vindictive against her
because, I don't know, they feel like they're
like, as if it's just frustrating to watch
people engage with their work. As outstanding as
it is, as as it speaks for itself,
you know, and it's information that she has
put a lot of work into. And and
there are people out there that just wanna
kinda break it down because it's too much
information. Like, that's actually one of the arguments
I keep seeing that it's like there's too
much to keep in your mind and that's
just that's that's an insult. That's a that's
not gonna hurt work. That's seems like an
attack on your brain. But overall, I think
it's important to go through that stuff. Look
at her work. It speaks for itself. So
I think what's important to highlight there is
the obvious the picture of what that was.
Right? What it has become. Sort of like
XAI and XAI with Elon Musk, same kind
of dynamic, but I'm highlight so continuing from
the direction of the AI created drugs and
everything else, the direction of which, you know,
the,
you know, the dual use technology, which is
the real larger category to see that through,
that's just one part of this larger kind
of technocratic control structure or weaponized versions of
what they use. I wanna include the point
that where she's talking about Palantir that is
currently with a strategic partnership with Israel as
they commit a genocide using their technology, testing
on Palestinians,
using it to kill people using the artificial
intelligence. That is the reality.
So from that point forward,
also, oh, in The United States be coming
off of all of that, lest I forget
that they are now rolling out the Israeli
made Gideon AI precrime system that Whitney's been
telling you they've been building toward the entire
time using the very people referencing and how
they're immersed with the Israeli government and overlapping
this with the kind of all encompassing,
you know,
overtaking,
infiltration of the US government and especially the
tech field. Now we already talked about this
a lot. This is not hard to see.
The many, many ways you can see as
we went over in the beginning in regard
to the,
great article from Genexx Girl. The the Israel
does this as a matter of practice. It'll
tell you. I'll play the clip again, both
from both from the sixty minutes clip but
also just from Netanyahu
or or the different articles where they cite
people who are running these companies and say,
we are executing these rally agenda. Like, they're
proudly saying it. Thinking about how all this
plays in. Here's Netanyahu. I'll just oh, I'm
not gonna play the clip, but just, Chris
Metahan pointing out Netanyahu is now bragging about
the billions of dollars that Israel is siphoning
out of the American big tech companies for
research and development.
This is the result of a deliberate policy
driven by Israel first American mega donors like
Paul Singer to counter BDS by outsourcing US
tech jobs to Israel. Like, so think about
the point of the bonds being donated to
the schools. You know, there there's different ways
that they're trying to counteract
the awareness of what they're doing in ways
that will make it irrelevant. So even though
we know it doesn't matter because if they
can control the schools like we talked about
where they can't divest even if they want
to or get Trump's team to move people
out of positions that are, you know, willing
to call out what Israel's doing, whether or
not you agree with the rest of their
political opinions, you know, it's it's clear they're
trying to shore up and, you know, tie
off all these different problems.
In this case,
you you're you're counteracting the BDS in a
different angle using these kind of tech jobs,
but also the
control of the tech industry and it by
and large or the surveillance network or what's
being done through our government.
This is an article that I think needs
to really bring this home for some people.
Because this is where it's going whether or
not Israel's involved. The alarming reality for me
that is what we've already seen is that
this is not just, like, using. This is
Israel facilitating
access to government resources in your country,
building trust and efficacy,
modernizing
resident identity, which I find an interesting term
for state and local government. I mean, in
every other place I could find it, resident
identity means essentially, like, you know, your national
identification
or for somebody who was sort of, like,
transient in a way. Right? I mean, but
either way, it'll go through what they means
by what they're highlighting here.
And then again, this is from 09/10/2025
from government technology, govtech.com.
State and local governments are under pressure to
deliver secure,
seamless,
and inclusive government digital services or just digital
services.
Let's not forget, Doge is called digital services.
It's what it still is. That's why what's
her name,
Amy Gleason, is now seemingly only focused on
wearables and RK's platform. What happened to Doge
and the money saving and all that? Now
are you really gonna pretend like we're just
never gonna talk about it again, that, like,
it doesn't exist? Or that never gonna pretend
that
it just it was success? Like, did he
win? Is it over?
I mean, how are we? It's just it's
kind of mind blowing how many things like
that are in this conversation. And we we
live in some kind of fantasy world right
now. Like, this country is in a really
weird spot more than I've ever seen. And
I've been doing this a while.
By unifying identity verification and access management,
Okta and SoCure, two companies,
spoiler alert, completely intertwined and immerse with Israel
policy or Israel intelligence,
help agencies reduce fraud, streamline
operations, and rebuild public trust in government systems.
So accessing digital government services,
so your access to, you know, Medicaid, Medicare,
government, you know, or whatever it is, government
services, going, you know, going online to, you
know, engage with the IRS, you know, whatever
it is.
Accessing digital government services should be simple and
and and secure,
yet 74%
of users over the past two years report
frustrating experiences. Right. Right. That's totally not because
they're just a ridiculous broken government that can't
do no. That's not it. It's because the
Internet services are complicated.
It's true. It's it's, you know, it's not
secure. Like, really?
That's what you think they're frustrated about? We
see they'll use your frustration about how ridiculous
they are to roll in more control over
your life. Typical government action. These challenges, especially
with identity verification,
undermine public trust and block access to critical
services.
Right. First of all, like, we're all desperately
trying to get involved with the government. Most
people I don't think I'm not a lot
of people aren't.
But that we need to make sure that,
you know, you're verifying who you are is
the only reason that's not happening. This is
the digital ID
lie. And that is the right here, this
is the,
one that Derek wrote. Very important.
Exposing the scam about human you know, the
digital ID is a human right.
Most people they're pointing to when they say
that do not want these things in foreign
countries, and they're being forced on them anyway.
So in this case,
framing it as, you know, the need to
identify who you are is why this is
such a problem. And it says modernization
is slow for many agencies due to legacy
infrastructure or that they're deliberately causing it to
happen so they could point to the failing
system to rationalize their new technocratic control structure.
It says or decentralized governance.
It
says, as cyber threats rise, agencies must meet
growing demands for intuitive, secure digital services. Right?
Because that's what we're all clamoring for. A
unified resident identity framework is key to secure,
seamless access and rebuilding trust.
Right? Because they know we nobody trust them.
Unified resident
identity framework.
So one spot one spot for every person
to engage with government services in your country
in a national
dynamic.
Resident identity,
as they frame it, is a digital approach
that helps governments confidently
verify,
protect, and manage access across all public services.
Right? So, in effect, you get your resident
identity, sort of like a national ID in
a way, or exactly like that. It combines
identity verification,
authentication, and access management into one streamlined system
built by the public sector.
So if the government's in a way evolved,
it'll probably be really terrible. It says, for
us for, from first
sign up to every interaction after, it ensures
the right person gets the right access every
time for essential services like health care benefits
and licensing and more.
Sure.
Maybe that's how it works out. Either way,
what we're talking about is you having a
one stop resident identity for everything possible under
the sun, government in involved.
And alone right there is that's a choke
point where you can be shut off from
these things or you can be boxed out
if you have wrong ideas, wrong opinion. This
is what we're talking about. It's just it's
the starting point of everything we've been telling
you is coming.
Now it gets even more frustrating when you
realize the two main companies that they're using
to do this, to to streamline and choke
point your access to government services should you
need them, is Israel.
It says barriers to secure identity management are
real and persistent.
Siloed systems are a barrier.
Right? Who cares if it was all set
up this way to ensure privacy, security, and,
you know, Bach, you know, lack of access
to foreign entities.
But now, because we don't care about those
things and never really have, we're gonna point
to the thing that was set up the
way to keep you safe as the very
problem for why we need to keep you
safe.
Or rather the frame of your data, but
it's the same idea.
Privacy compliance,
navigating state laws and federal standards like National
Institute of Standards, adds a little layer. Yeah.
It could get rid of all the state
stuff. Let's go right to national everything. Right?
National ID, national data, that's what the point
is. That's where a coordinated approach is beneficial.
Secure and Okta together provide a secure, modular,
and scalable foundation for resident identity.
To counter these challenges, agencies need a modern
identity strategy built on zero trust architecture.
This means verifying users throughout their entire journey,
not just a sign up. Great. Get ready
for, you know, all the frustrating weird checks
and, you know, CAPTCHAs and, you know, whatever
it ends up being. My point is this
is not a you prove it and then
you go forward, but they're gonna you know,
this will be abused in my opinion if
you know how these things work. How or
rather have been abused in the past. That
ultimately, you, you know, somehow not be able
to get through these multi checks because you
know, or it'll be incessant and frustrating and,
you know, whatever it is. This there's no
reason to me that you would be in
a situation where you verify who you are
and then have to keep doing that multiple
times throughout the process
other than control.
Yeah. Maybe it makes it a little more
secure, but is that what anybody's calling for?
Does anybody want more of those processes? I
don't believe.
This says agencies
need identity solutions that can adapt to evolving
threats,
streamline operations, and scale to meet public expectations.
One state was confronted with thousands of siloed
applications. How how frustrating
and outdated infrastructure that they've allowed to become
dilapidated.
It adopted a zero trust approach and partnered
to justify access under a single secure login.
Boom. Just like that. One stop shop, single
location, much less secure, but easier for everybody
including Israel.
Now the point is the two companies. SoCure,
which they don't get into in Zartebo, of
course, and
Okta.
Let's look into those companies. What do you
think we'll find?
Well, here's just what Rak had to say.
Okta, a leading US based identity and access
management company,
has established significant ties to Israel primarily through
strategic acquisitions, research and development expansion, and partnership
in specifically their cybersecurity sector.
Okta has actively invested in their,
specifically, Israeli startups. Like, exact this is a
another element of this exact thing. And it
says Okta acquired
Tel Aviv based Axiom Security for an estimated
$100,000,000.
Okta's first major Israeli acquisition, valued at 100
to 130,000,000,
brought in,
Spero's identity security platform. They're, like, buying up
all the different security verification platforms
on on threat detection, attack surface management, and
risk reduction headquartered in Tel Aviv. These acquisitions
reflect Okta's strategy to absorb innovative Israeli tech.
Fantastic.
Here is some articles on this. Okta acquires
Israeli cyber startup, Acxiom, $100,000,000,000
deal.
Okta to acquire Israeli startup, Spura Security.
So you did they basically just absorb Israeli
companies which become, you know, the them.
Now what's interesting is you can look into
this and find out, well, well, the Okta
in general
is it the one right here making sure
I'm on the yeah. Okay. Same point.
So Okta having a complete
overlap with Israel, you might think, well, that
might not be what the government is choosing
to use. This is just talking about. No.
It's already happening. So these articles floated about
where it goes
seems a little bit dishonest when you realize
it's already happening. A leading identity access management
company has very deep integrations with the US
federal government, and it goes on to list
a bunch of specifically with zero trust identity
solutions. So it's already what the US government's
using. So they're already overlapping or intertwining an
Israeli entity throughout this secure government access situation.
And then same thing with Socure, s o
c u r e. Very, very immersed with
the with the US government
already happening. So both of those things were
already being utilized in many already it can
it,
already in place government situations or, processes.
Oh, tonight. Today, I said I think I
made a mistake. I thought I thought that's
when I add two of those up.
The point was and I could just ask
it again. But the point was that Okta
and So Cure let me just do it
real quick.
What I what I was doing when I
see, I knew it. I doubled up on
this one,
and I made the mistake of
alright. Let's see what it says. Oops.
It's it's the point we it's it's exactly
what we know. The the point was specifically
that they're invested in multiple
well, that's very interesting.
God, I need to go back and get
the screenshot. I don't wanna waste time on
this, but I feel like this is different
now. Either way, the the company is overlap
with Israeli companies. That was the major point,
as well as all the companies they're buying.
This just got doubled up on the the
government overlap.
Now Vietnam ramps up pace of digital transformation
as biometric cleans up banking. It's happening all
around the world.
Not just digital ID and digital processes, but
the, you know, at the basically, the choke
point between you and accessing services. But it's
just really what digital ID is for, but
that's not how many people think about it.
But that's what it's developing into.
Now Big Brother Watch also points out a
digital system in The UK could be hacked
easily according to a new whistleblower, showing that
these systems they're building with the same kind
of sys you know, the way it's being
set up. That's the idea. This, like, siloed
one spot one stop shop system
is making it easier for things like this.
Now you could argue that's by design.
It's it's clear. It says a centralized digital
ID scheme would be disastrous for privacy. That's
why we're fighting back. I argue that's why
The US and Israel want this system in
place or any of them because it's easier
to manipulate, it's easier
to concentrate.
That's from the Daily Mail.
Israel cybersecurity firm buys ExpressVPN for close to
a billion dollars. Just this kind of consolidation
of as many possible things you could possibly
find. Now they're still framed as a not
Israeli company,
but that's but nonetheless, that is becoming the
reality with a lot of them. Laura Loomer
points out, after this week, I'd like to
see Twitter put country tags on every account
so we know where they're coming from, which
is funny because we're all like, okay. Like,
as much as we shouldn't want more identification,
it's funny that she says that with the
real point for most people that probably even
follow her. That's probably what we'd like to
see from an Israeli bot situation.
But the idea is that it's about more
identification,
less
privacy.
And they're using they're framing about, you know,
foreign bots, this fake Israeli propagandist. Even though
this platform is overrun with Israeli bots, that's
not what they're talking about.
The point is they're just using almost their
own problem, their own created issue to call
for more identification.
ICE, as we've already pointed out, obtains access
to Israeli made spyware that can hack phones
and encrypted
apps. It's every single place you look right
now. Samsung users in The Middle East, Africa.
I shouldn't say every single place. It's just
it's obviously a lot. I'm being hyperbolic.
It says if you own a Samsung a
or m in MENA, your data's at risk.
Samsung's budget series phones come with AppCloud,
an app built by Israel firm, IronSource.
In in investigations show it collects location, device
data without clear consent.
I mean, guys, what's funny is people always,
oh, you just everything Israel is not bad,
and I'm not saying that. My point is
that these are bad, and it turns out
that they're connected to Israel. That's the reality
of this. You can prove not only that
that's the case, but then if you actually
take the time to look that the Israeli
government does do this. And they've made this
very clear. They do things just like this,
and you can claim it's for their national
security. But it's a it's a lie. It's
a manipulation. It's invasive.
And in frank frankly, it's used against you.
Interesting.
Andrew Covette,
Charlie Kirk,
says I just broke news that our tech
partners
tracked
over 277,000
devices in and around State Farm Stadium yesterday.
What?
So Republicans, you're okay with that? You're out
there mourning for Charlie Kirk and they're tracking
your phone?
They came from all across the country because
Charlie pointed us all to Christ, he says.
And in his martyrdom, gave us the courage
to do the same.
So
why would you even say that? What is
the what are you talking about? So the
idea is to promote the idea see, you're
you're this is weird to me. You're framing
this as,
look at what we tracked everybody. Look. They
came from all over the country. Let's all
cheer about that without even realizing that you're
going, yay. You tracked our phones?
And then Mac Blumenthal says, who are your
tech partners? It's a great question.
I mean, guys, there's some weird, weird stuff
around this, and you just can't decouple the
Israel part of this anymore. I mean, it
is on the surface of this conversation.
And I'll play this clip again for you
to recognize what we're talking about and how,
yes, without question, Israel does this because they've
admitted it, but these all they've also proudly
talked about it in interviews about how these
as a former and current Israeli intelligence will
go around and set up companies that that
conduct interest of the Israeli government.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way being traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
This is Mossad's old office.
Its motto from Proverbs twenty four six says
in so many words,
wage war through deception and trickery.
Kinda like the CIA smoke and mirrors, which
is what this operation was all about,
starting with those walkie talkies.
But walkie talkies are only worn in battle,
so Mossad began developing a new device
that Hezbollah fighters would have in their pockets
all the time,
a pager.
You know, except for the fact that a
lot of other innocent people happen to use
pagers too. You think she doesn't know that?
Like, what a it's just it's it's willful
ignorance
to try to act like that's not the
most deliberately obvious terrorist act we've ever seen.
They will manufacture. The world is our stage.
We set up companies that nobody knows we
own. I mean, how do we not now
realize, the the ones we're talking about are
ones that you can prove are connected to
Israeli intelligence. Now there I mean, how there's
there's probably even more deep versions of this
that you can't even verify,
and they're literally telling you that right to
your face.
Now I what I was grabbing really quickly,
I'll include some of this for you. I
find it really interesting that that did the
in the,
what popped up in that when I searched
for it was I was different in my
opinion. I'll include this for you. We've already
talked about this company in particular. This is
just from The Intercept. The US companies honed
their surveillance tech in Israel. Now it's coming
home. There's more to the reality. So cure
in the rest of these. I just I'll
come I'm gonna make a point to come
back to that. That was meant to be
just a quick overlapping point about the hundreds
of other ways we can see the Israeli
overlap with just all sorts of US information.
I mean, the idea that their overlap with
the AI
the memorandum of understanding around AI alone
is more than you I mean, it's everything
they have on you, or Palantir for that
matter as they surveil everything in this country.
This is simply to show you that the
extensions of that,
the the the companies being used to to
process or about to be or will be
in the structure they're building, All access to
government data are companies that are either allowing
that data to filter back to Israel or
are
the middleman between that. And that on that
same note, by the way, again,
let's not forget the evidence we already have
of that exact thing happening within the White
House
of Walls himself
having a what was called TeleMessage,
a an Israeli app that archived
their internal White House inner circle conversation on
signal.
This wasn't even a secret. You could look
it up and read it for yourself. They
just focused on the signal part of it.
TeleMessage was what he was using. That's the
picture you can see right there.
That's not signal you're looking at. You can
prove that. And is it a Israeli intelligence
tech archive app that was relaying their information
back to as far as I can tell,
they're still using it. That's just unbelievable until
you realize what's going on.
But here's WikiLeaks.
Israeli aligned billionaires seize TikTok in battle for
US narrative control. The White House has announced
that the forced sale of TikTok will be
finalized this week. New ownership led by Larry
Ellison, the largest individual donor to the IDF,
will take over The US user data and
the algorithm, which the White House says will
be retrained.
Ellison, who made his fortune developing Oracle, a
database system he originally built for the CIA,
already controls CBS, Paramount, MTV, Comedy Central, Showtime,
Nickelodeon, which makes shows for kids, as well
as channel ten in Australia and channel five
in The UK. Ellison is also expected to
finalize control over Warner Brothers, Discovery, including CNN,
HBO, Discovery Channel before the 2025.
No big deal, though. Right? Even before he
forced sales on final
forced sale was finalized,
censorship of TikTok content criticizing Israel,
including the deal itself, has reached extreme levels
in the platform, has or at has reached
extreme levels as the platform moves to align
with its prospective new owners. The censorship. I
must have missed that word. Yeah. Censorship on
TikTok.
So, I mean, before they even take over,
they're censoring
conversations around the deal. Guys, this is just
transparent.
And let's not forget, as I think this,
yeah. Well, this is what this is what
it's worth pointing out. Here's what Clint Russell
says. Trump basically told us it was too
dangerous for TikTok to be foreign owned as
it was influencing our young people.
He then forced the sale.
It went from being Chinese aligned to Israeli
aligned, and somehow foreign influence is no longer
a problem.
Nice. I agree. It's a good point to
make. I just like to point out as
usual that it's too bad people like this
weren't listening to us and, in fact, called
us black pill purity test when we tried
to make this case before we got here.
Now good. I'm glad it's calling out. Maybe
my point is though that I think this
problem persists,
that it's easy to point these things out
after it's already there even though many were
making this case before. But I'm not gonna
begrudge somebody for making the point. Good. I'm
glad it's there. We should tall it out.
We should raise it up like I'm doing
now. But if we get back around to
this point again and we have in the
same arguments, just don't forget that. Recognize the
principle or the lack thereof when that time
comes.
And I'm not saying that maybe maybe he'll
prove
the that that's the case, that he that's
a principle that will now not be changed.
But I think, historically, we've seen people that
kind of fluctuate around the partisan game. That
tends to be the the common factor. Now
this, to continue,
is the idea that we're talking about selling
the company
because of foreign influence and then not caring
that a different foreign influence is there. The
point makes itself, guys.
You just you choose to acknowledge it or
not. It's up to you. If you wanna
see the truth, it's right there in front
of you.
Even before it says, where were we? Yeah.
It says Fox, a Murdoch asset, is also
seeking to join the Ellison consortium, a move
that could enable cross platform between Fox and
TikTok, further tightening the Israeli aligned information bubble.
This is WikiLeaks, just to confirm. Just reassert
that for the podcast.
Disapproval of what Israel is doing in Gaza
has risen from 60% of The United States
population,
nearly double the approval rate of 32%.
It's every good look.
How long have I been saying this?
The country sees it.
Republicans see it, and the majority of people
in this country see it.
And yet you're being lied to, gaslit by
all the screaming partisan at the top of
the paradigm on both sides, by the way.
The US still had because let's not forget
Biden supported it just the same. It's
and I'm talking about the outcome. Right? Not
the narrative, but what they did and what
happened. Exactly the same. The US still has
over three years of Trump left. Israel aligned
Jewish billionaires control OpenAI, Google, Meta, Facebook, Instagram,
WhatsApp, Palantir, CBS, HBO, and most of Conde,
Nast, Reddit, Vogue, New Yorker, Wired, GQ, Vanity
Fair Vanity Fair, as well as numerous Hollywood
studios, regional papers, and radio stations. Let's not
forget it's down to four, if not less
than that, of companies that own 90% of
every single piece of debt of media in
this country.
Four, not six, because two of those have
merged.
Now with this, it's probably less. That's my
point. Behind the scenes,
who who knows? Europe, meanwhile, remains largely absent
offering very little,
little real competition in the information space. It's
one real success it it's one real success
story, Telegram, which it managed to comprehensively alienate
after France arrested its founder supposedly for not
handing over enough user data. Will the EU
and The US ally allies align with the
Israelified
TikTok algorithm or attempt to create a politicized
alternative of their own? The fact that even
WikiLeaks is even using that term,
the origin window is broken. The only people
pretending that we don't all see this are
the people that are gaslit, the people that
are blackmailed, or the people that are part
of the agenda.
It's just that transparent to me. Decentralized alternatives
like Pete and Noster
offer strong resistance to censorship but are still
young. Larger platforms like Telegram and RedNote carry
serious risks of censorship, including eventual sell offs
to other interests. For users, the sweet spot
may be used both. Now I argue to
get away from all those in general. Lean
into platforms that actually care, you know, that
do like like, Bitchute, for example, that actually
genuinely cares about free speech.
There's you know, the reality though is that
this is gonna be, you know, rationalized.
But here's what I'm actually one way shout
out to Decentral News
who got WikiLeaks for using their content here.
So good on them. They deserve the credit
for that because they do good work. Now
here's Ellison.
Listen to what he has to say. Now
realize how many things we just listed off
that just one person
ultimately has control over.
Now listen to this. It's about this little
connection to this little
Well,
the renewal of the Jewish states,
is is something that I I think touches
all of us.
For February,
we were a stateless people,
And now we have a country of our
own
defended by all the brave men and women
of the IDF.
So anything we can do to support them
So this is an American citizen. Right?
Who,
you know, devote their lives for
preserving,
the state Of Israel,
keeping the people safe,
and allowing our state to continue
in in in in very sometimes in very,
very difficult situations.
I've I have been to Israel.
I have been to the border.
I have spent time to the people who
govern the State Of Israel.
And, you know, I feel a deep a
deep emotional
connection, to the State Of Israel and the
Israeli people. You are an ITEC person. What
do you think about these really
startups
and high-tech,
phenomena?
Oh. In case you didn't hear it, he's
talked about specifically the startups. That's what we're
talking about. That is the startup nation, guys.
This is about them
infiltrating
the system, the the the industry
rather, foreign countries. Here's what he says. Oh,
well,
you know, after Silicon Valley, there's an area
it hurts Herzliya
has probably got more startups than any other
place other than Silicon Valley in Northern California.
So there's, we've actually acquired a number of
Israeli companies.
We have two CEOs at Oracle. One's name
is Safra Katz, and she was born in
Israel.
So,
again,
we love the country love the country of
Israel, and we'll do everything we can to
support the country of Israel. Now I'm in
no way saying that just because you're from
Israel, therefore, you're a problem. I'm not. Even
for Israel. Like, that's even like Israel. I'm
not saying that about Jewish people. I'm not
saying that about Israel citizens. But what's important
to point out is that they will tell
you from a system a systematic
point that they infiltrate that the the people
that are that most Israelis, let's put it
that way, will then go out and act
in that manner. That's a like, a point
of pride. They'll tell you that. We'll go
out and and and, you know, honestly, you
could say that about a lot of citizens
of the world. US people will do that
and and, you know, project the the greatness
of The United States. But we're talking about
people that are coming through and acting from
a US point
as if they're not, you know, continuation of
Israeli
foreign policy intelligence agenda
and then continue to act that out as
if they're working for US interest. Like, that's
what APAC ultimately does. But so the fact
that the CEO is Israeli, it could mean
something, and it should make a it should
be a red flag, I would even argue,
argue, because we know that that is something
the Israeli government does through Israeli people and
then blames you for being concerned about that
but claiming you hate Jewish people.
Even though here's a conversation, well, they'll probably
tell you how they do that. Like, it's
just meant to trap you with exactly what
you can point to. It's insane. But they
it's it's a trap to meant you to
convince you to think it's about the religion,
not people that are Israeli.
But ask it. You should. Because history proves
that you should. Here that many people criticize
in Israel,
especially after the gas operation.
How do you feel if someone just say
we love Israel so much? Well, again, it's
a difficult situation, isn't it?
To conduct military operations around civilians is very
is very difficult.
And, of course,
there were tragic,
tragedies,
and the civilians were, you know, were hurt.
That's a terrible thing. But one thing we
know for certain that the Israeli army did
everything they could
to minimize civilian casualties.
And and that in that regard,
they've done a much better job than a
lot of other armies all over the world
throughout history. Wow. Thank you very much.
Now to be clear, this is not new.
So what he's referring to there is not
the post October 7 conversation. But it doesn't
it's the same point. If you've been paying
attention long enough, you know that in 2014
or other examples, Israel did not not even
close to this degree, but in principle, the
same thing.
So here is a report from Megatron. Israel
reveals the six Jewish American billionaires who've quietly
become the backbone of Israel's wartime funding.
One of them is Larry Ellison, the man
who just bought TikTok to brainwash young Americans.
So the this is Jerusalem Post. Six Jewish
billionaires have quietly become the backbone of Israel's
wartime funding. These Jewish millionaires are literally funding
the ongoing genocide
while The United States is also doing so.
Can you think about how much money is
flowing this direction and still like, I you
could think of that as you will.
Bottom line is that's not your responsibility, I
mean, or anybody's to continue to support an
ongoing genocide. But the idea that these are
American citizens who are doing so I mean,
guys, that's a crime when you break this
down. Of course, because the US government will
never acknowledge what they're doing, but instead label
entire broads, you know, undefined elements as somehow,
you know, all of Trende Iraq were terrorist
organizations despite that not being the actual case
even though they're a terrible group or that
they're not working on behalf of Venezuela, or
all of Antifa is now a terrorist organization,
even though you are abstractly making that about
anybody you think is on the left who
wears a mask. Meanwhile, I the ICE are
allowed to wear masks because that's I mean,
it is we're broken ourselves. The or rather,
I think somebody has broken this country.
Not every not I mean, I think a
lot of people see it, but something is
awry within the partisan game, and it's just
becoming obvious day by day. There's Trump, you
know, fighting for free speech, well, then coming
out and saying,
but when 97%
of the stories are bad about a person,
it's no longer free speech. He actually said
that.
And I said, yes, Trump. It really still
is, though. And that you don't know that
or don't care is alarming.
I I've just I'm blown away.
This was on
nineteenth.
He literally says the full quote. When 97%
of the stories are bad about a person,
it's no longer free speech.
That's what he said.
Talk you know, this is about the FCC
point. He's talking about media.
He see he he just reveals the reality,
guys. Are is anybody actually of the mind
that because they went too hard against him,
therefore, that's not protected?
They are systematically
trying to destroy what they claim they're fighting
for, or he's too dumb to know what
he's doing. I don't think it's the latter.
I think he's no. I think they're aware
of what they're doing. I just think that
is insane
in your face.
And we have well, as we are she
already pointed
out, APAC giving a private meeting to the
speaker of the house. Because that's normal. Right?
The proxy for Israel is illegal is and
should have no privileged access to US politicians.
I agree.
Private meeting with APAC,
where they pledged to screen out isolationists
in GOP candidates.
Right? Because that's democracy. Right? They're this is
crazy where we are. Here's supposedly America First
percent.
Here's what he has to say.
It's a nation that is the most resilient
I've ever seen on Earth.
Yay, America. Oh, wait. Is that what he's
talking about?
It may sound a little bit this afternoon
as if I'm almost speaking on behalf of
Israel rather than The US, but I wanna
explain
that part of my advocacy
in our relationship
is because
if you came to my house tonight for
dinner.
Oh, and let's not forget, he's at the
fifty states one Israel conference. And you came
in and you said, oh, Mike, we like
you. We really think the world of you.
We just enjoy being with you.
We're so excited to be here with you
and have dinner with you.
But your wife,
we can't stand her.
We don't like her a bit. I hope
she's not gonna be at the table.
I would say, well, she will be, you
won't be, get out.
Because
if you were to insult my partner,
you have insulted me. Great. So is The
US the spouse, or is Israel the spouse?
How you working that one out? Clearly, he
just suggested that Israel is the spouse of
The United States.
You may sound like I'm speaking for because
you are speaking for Israel. That's transparent, man.
You are a blind blind religious Zionist, and
you've made that clear.
They this this person, like many, if not
all of Trump's cabinet, are blindly
advocating for Israel almost always at the expense
of American interest, but then always going America
first, America first.
Like Stephen Miller, for example.
Like, creating a civil war situation and claiming
he's fighting for you.
Here's the same discussion point.
Ambassador oh, I'm sorry. I said beset. It's
Huckabee. My mistake. I'm sorry. I've you know,
I'm sorry. I I blend together these blind
Zionist, you know, rather just religious blinds, whatever.
You know, people that are adherent to Zionism
at the expense of American interest.
Huckabee,
to deny Gaza genocide, says Hamas purposely moved
civilians into Israel's bombs.
It's ridiculous.
Here is John Meisharmirth,
was it is it Mersheimer? That's what it
is, I think. Right?
Professor
telling you that Trump is owned by Israel.
His opinion,
but just recognize how easy this is to
see and how many people
with, you know, clout are out there telling
you that that's the reality,
including people who are Republicans.
I mean, is that something that could be
leveraged in the Trump cabinet by,
clear,
I don't know whether to call them Zionist
assets, Israel lobby under the you know, your
famous book,
Stephen Miller,
Rubio. These people were saying, look,
on your visit to, the Middle East, just
always remember Israel because if you don't, Israel
could collapse.
Look. The Israel basically owns the Trump administration.
It's not even an interesting issue.
And, Donald Trump is never gonna do anything
that challenges Israel in a meaningful way. I
mean, here you have a president who comes
in
to office in the wake of genocide Joe's
complicity with Israel,
in executing
this genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza.
And what does Trump do? If anything, he
goes even further than genocide, Joe,
to help and encourage the Israelis to execute
the genocide.
This just tells you the extent to which,
Trump is beholden to the lobby.
Yep. I completely agree with that. Now I'm
gonna I'm gonna wrap up a little bit
because I just don't want this to be
much longer.
But I I'm only gonna skip a tiny
amount. But in in general, the the show,
which I'm planning to try to do tomorrow,
but it's, you know, slightly up in the
air, but that's my plan,
is to go over this, and I'll make
sure we touch on it. But this just,
you know, I'll include the the one of
the recent shows, was Israel involved with Charlie
Kirk's death? Let's look at the facts.
But just briefly, you know, that this is
just the point saying, you know, we as
they said, we're in outer space.
Now this and this partisan person, clearly, you
could look at their account. But the point
is, you know, people are recognizing how weird
this is.
They said they they simply frame this might
be the greatest collective psychosis I've seen since
January 6. There are petitions circling to get
Starbucks to name a drink after him, a
law in Oklahoma demanding that every public college
build a statue of him. The people in
his Charlie Kirk. People in his your team
are call calling him a prophet.
You know, it's in my opinion, it's insulting
to his memory to try to pretend that
that even makes sense. But that it's all
about politics. He's using that's why many of
them are trying to censor people using him
knowing he didn't believe that.
But it is. It's crazy. It's it's gotten
out of control.
This this great quote. When fascism comes to
America, it will be wrapped in the flag
and carrying the cross. Sinclair Lewis, 1935. Now
this is a point you could make in
many different ways.
You know, you could make the same case
for you know, it's a point the point
they're making, regardless of whether you think it's
the flag and the cross, it's it will
come in a form that is not synonymous
with fascism. It'll come in the form that
you're comfortable with, in the form that you
think means the opposite. Like, that's how these
things work. And here's a picture at Charlie
Kirk's memorial, the the or excuse me, the
Republican rally that it was
with a guy literally carrying around a gigantic
cross.
I mean, it's just the point is simple,
guys, that they are using these things to
make you think you're fighting what you're actually
forcing in.
And the point was about his I mean,
whore that you listen to the speech. I'm
gonna skip it for now, but this guy
is
I've said this for the entire time. Look
at him. Not, I mean, the way he
looks. I mean, look at the way he's
conducting himself. Look at the actions he's conduct
he's taking. Look at the way he's framing
things. He's lying to you day by day,
provably, easily verifiable, and he's doing so in
a way that is causing the the country
to fight itself.
If you wanna ask any religious Zionist what
they need before the end time, they need
this country to collapse.
Listen to what they're saying. Listen to what
people in Trump's cabinet believe, but yet still
argue America first.
If you listen to this, it's all framed
under we're the greatest one. They're they're the
evil. We're the good. We're the light. They're
the darkness.
We will remove them. You don't understand what
you've awakened. It's it is about I mean,
like I say, Goebbels.
This feels very reminiscent of these Nazi type
speeches. I'm not even trying to make it
about Nazism. It's about the kind of propaganda
we've seen in the past.
He's doing this. We'll come back to this,
but it's important to recognize what he is
doing.
Mel points out, notice how he went from
claiming Charlie Kirk was mainstreaming rabid Israel hate?
Let's not forget that. Thirty seconds before we
got here,
most of these people, like Lumer and the
rest, were hating on him. Ben Shapiro, called
a clown.
And the point was that he's mainstreaming
Israel
hate. A lot of them were doing that,
saying that, claiming that you brought,
Dave Smith and and and,
Tucker Carlson. That you're why are you it's
all framing him for bad anti Israel stuff.
Then claiming it's a conspiracy to say that
he was changing his opinion.
You can't have it both ways, guys. Really,
obviously, with their own content, you can point
out they said they were doing those things.
Now the rumors of the world are claiming
that never happened. And he's been he was
my best friend ever, like rewriting history. It's
disgusting.
Of course, Alex Jones being wrong kind of
routinely about this stuff. Here's the Alex Jones
is wrong jar.
You know? Co no. He did not do
what you claimed there, Joan. You can watch
all this stuff, but it's just day after
day after day. One laugh, another lie. It
builds into another argument. It's just it it
is insanely clear. Watch. If you just wanna
if you if you're not just having fun
watching him look like an idiot on air,
maybe you can recognize that he's deceiving you
or spinning narratives that just align with, you
know, what I think the real point.
Where was it? Oh, it's right there.
TikTok is threatening to ban my account, this
person says, for posting
literally this video. The video of John Stockwell,
former CIA agent,
interview where he talks about the CIA planting
fake stories in the media, and they delete
it for being false information.
What a, like, what a clone world. This
is a cartoon. Now you've seen this clip.
You've seen, I mean, even just the beginning
of it. You remember this clip. Well, one
of the four principal functions of the CIA
is to gather intelligence and
and ideally forward it to the
the president, the users of information, the policy
makers, as they say. There are other functions,
however, some of them more legitimate than others.
One is to run secret wars,
the covert action that's written and talked about
so much, like what's happening in Nicaragua today
from Honduras.
Another thing is to
disseminate
propaganda to influence people's minds,
and this is a major function of the
CIA.
You remember. Right? And the point they go
on is they ask, you know, did you
do this with the court media? And the
point is yes. You feed them a few
things, then you, you know, you feed them
stories to get their to gain their trust,
then you you deceive them where it matters.
This is Alex Jones in my opinion. He's
the one being played. I mean, this is
what I think makes the most sense at
this point. He probably even kinda senses that,
but doesn't care. Is it he could come
out and spin with all my remember okay.
Where are the let let's just check this
one out.
Let's see. Where is it?
See if this comes up if I just
do this.
Nope, let's see.
Point is that there's a recent article that
we do wanna that we wanna reiterate an
article, but
Oh, here. That's funny. Here he is interviewing
Gavin, get mc,
Gavin McGinnis. You know, the one who just
let proudly told you they were hypocrites and
it's okay because screw you left. Right? So
they're just the same and they're they're all
leaning into that, I guess.
Let's see if we can find it real
quick.
And then we can wrap it up.
I'm gonna talk about the Casper Dell point
too as we wrap up here. Here we
go.
Okay.
Let's get that out there again.
Here he is saying huge DOJ actions incoming.
You know what? Let's let's do it real
quick just for fun.
So I just think it's important, guys, because
what we're being told, right,
is that there's a whole lot
happening, whether there there's, you know, there are
all the arrests are coming down. Comey and
and Clinton and everybody. Right?
Here's what he said. I'll play at the
beginning of it.
Or not. It doesn't wanna load. There we
go.
Okay. Here's this clip.
Alright.
I have been talking to a lot of
high level DOJ sources. I'll leave it at
that. I had a long conversation with one
today.
And I was actually authorized to tell you
Mhmm. Big stuff. Basically everything they told me
except a few things. But you know what?
I with the notes I wrote, I'm gonna
think about this
and before I start putting it out
because this is big, big, big information.
And folks know about me and InfoWars. I
don't tell you I got something big unless
I got something
very, very big. Yeah. Just one little example
of thousands.
Remember how on that Monday before RFPG Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. I was right. I was right.
I was right all the time about everything,
all the time, even though that's
patently false.
The point is huge DOJ actions incoming. Okay.
What happened? That was on August 23. Okay.
Well, maybe it takes more than a month.
That's certainly possible. Right?
But I don't believe it. I didn't believe
it day one. That's my opinion. Any updates,
though? I said on August 29. I'm super
excited about these clearly not fake big, big,
big actions coming. Oh, and is Obama in
jail yet since you claimed that he was
the sure thing? Asking for a friend. Oh,
and here's decent news. Back in 2024,
Jones says that he's going to prosecute Klaus
Schwab, Bill Gates, and Fauci, and Hillary if
we can keep Trump alive.
Well, he seems to be alive still. How'd
that work out? Claim after claim after claim.
You know? The point is that I don't
think he's all I think he believes this
stuff half the time because he thinks he
it's the
same way that Trump and
his own hubris allow him to think that
he's somehow the smartest person in the room
because he's just such a great journalist.
You know? The the that somebody dumps things
in your lap and you repeat what you
say without even checking it, like Laura Loomer
or everyone else that's worked with you. Anyway,
the reality is clearly this does not seem
to be panning out. I think that's the
case for it is that they get dumped
information late. They release that isn't actually the
case, and they just move forward.
So here's a guy breaking this down. Mel
says, the guy does a great job of
shredding this moronic narrative, the one that Jones
is laying out. Plus, there's video of someone
shooting a dummy set from a 150 yards.
It says something tells me this story from
Alex is laying the groundwork for them telling
us they can't do ballistics because Charlie's bones
of steel broke the bullet with too many
pieces.
What people will believe today continues to baffle
me. But that's a good video. It's only
two minutes. You can watch it. He breaks
this stuff down. Here is one of these
posts from Jones for today saying, the time
is now, or somebody posting what he said
by in his war room. We are accelerating
the into offense.
Like, that hasn't already been happening. You can
feel it. Churches are full. The left and
global elites in fear. Deep state objectives being
removed.
Everything is now up was or is everything
up to now with a prelude?
The real battle is just beginning.
Wow. Like, I was I I tweeted that
you you're the this is fine. Burning house
meme in real time
Or this one. Same day. The revolutionary actions
taken by Trump administration just get better and
better and better. Alex Jones calls on black
pillars. Oh, you mean, like, the one like
us that you call black pill for being
right about all of this before? You celebrate
the many victories of the America first over
the new world
order. Not a joke.
And he says, if you don't do this,
you're not for real.
Right? If you don't pretend what's we're the
the Stargate and big crisper meat and fake
salmon and every other thing we've been lied
to about and self amplifying shots.
If you don't pretend that's the greatest thing
in the world, then you're not real.
Or if you pretend that the technate and
the overtaking of these low you know, the
conversation of the the the North American Union
that you ignore because it's what Trump is
doing. If you pretend that's happy, you're not
real.
If you ignore the global Zionist takeover and
everything, if you ignore all the different I
mean, or if you pretend that Israel is
still happening or if you pretend that Ukraine
war is still going, all the different claims
that are false.
My point is just absurd. Do you do
you know any Republicans that think that every
single promise has been delivered Other than blind
followers that are lying to themselves? Because you
can prove that's not the case, guys. As
Stargate always promised,
I thought the wars would be over already.
Come on. We're not this stupid.
This is embarrassing.
Better and better and better. This is cat
turd going. We're winning every day, and everything's
great.
It's not
objectively. But here's Greg Reese.
Alex Jones is now selling holy war apparel.
A true wolf in sheep's clothing. Holy war.
This is on September 13, guys. September 13.
They just moved past that. Holy war. Now
look at what's happening. Look at the actual
content that's rolling out.
Either he's spearheading the movement that's creating division
to such a degree that it's actually causing
a religious war in this country,
or he was told to do that, and
it was ahead of what was actually happening.
Donald Trump.
What do democrats stand for? Chaos, anger. They're
losers. They stand for nothing. Oh, do you
mean the radical ones? No. No. All of
them. Oh, okay. So thank you for making
that clear. The point is the dehumanization, the
othering of the other side, just like Carrie
made clear, that both sides do. But let's
not pretend that saying this is somehow less
or, like, that saying you're a fascist is
incitement, but this is just benign.
They're both free speech, and they're both actually
driving people to act ridiculously, which would still
be their responsibility.
Just stop lying to yourself that this is
somehow like, that it's good because that is
the truth, and ours is is you know,
theirs is wrong because we're not bad.
Even though you're both calling each other what
you think is happening, and it's just embarrassing.
And the governments laugh it up as morons
like Loomer push the same thing. Stephen Miller
understands the assignment.
Many others don't.
Crush the left so they never rise again.
Right? Half of the mainstream political conversation just
destroy them. I mean, this is my joke
about people like Lumer, that they think they're
in the middle of it. They're in you
know? Yes. She's got a lot of followers.
I think that the point is to use
someone like her to make the rest of
independent media look stupid.
The reality is you're not supposed to say
it like that right now. The narrative is
supposed to be that we're going after the
bad stuff. Right? Not just anybody. It's like
we're fighting the bad Palestinian Hamas. Not every
Palestinian, but, yes, you are and we all
see it. Same thing. She comes out like
the moron and goes, kill them all. Palestinians
are all bad. Because she thinks that's what
they're like, I'm the it's like Gavin and
and and and and and and and and
and and and and and and
that we're our hypocrites.
Because left is bad, we're okay because we're
the good guys. You're all children, and you
all think that you're all fighting the worst
thing in the world when you're being pitted
against each other by the real worst thing
in the world. But swipe she comes out
and says the thing.
Not some of them, not the radical ones,
but kill them all. You know? That's what
she does.
Alex Jones,
task force
going against, as he writes,
the the government weaponization against the American people
has launched an investigation into the Democrat party.
What you might fee find interesting is that
nothing in there says that.
So Jones is going this person's investigating what
appears to be a part of something around
Jones's prop case,
and then he makes that about the Democrat
party
because that's the narrative. But you told me
where the maybe this is what this turns
out to be. Maybe he's got inside information.
I don't know. But I think it's funny
how often they're lying to you about what
these things are really about or that this
amounts to be nothing but a statement.
But then we're winning. Read the letter below
or check out this really weird picture he
posted where he looks like a midget.
Here she is saying we also,
we will also be most importantly looking at
who's funding Antifa and who's funding these other
violent left wing groups.
You know my opinion about Antifa and Patriot
Front, which is my opinion, the same kind
of thing on both sides of the paradigm.
Doesn't mean every person, though. Effort there's plenty
of people who don't know, don't know any
better, or go out and do things claiming
they're Antifa, maybe started their own group. Like,
the idea that you could just broad stroke
the entire thing that is 100%
not a terrorist organization by any stretch of
the imagination, but very much could be manipulated
by the government, because I do think that's
often the case.
The idea that you've just turned this into
funding from any case. Okay. So now retroactively,
if you funded Lester Stevens, say, innocently, something
you thought was people actually fighting fascism even
though they're actually fascist.
By definition, by the way. They're not they're
not. They're what they do is they they
it's funny. But so then all of a
sudden, now these people who might have done
so, now they're guilty?
How does that work?
I made the point. How much do you
wanna bet, though? This never even account amounts
to anything. It's all a bunch of bluff
and narrative and bluster that don't go anywhere
to make you think you're fighting the bad
guys. But distraction and political division is what
happens. Meaning, no major funding bombshell ever materializes.
And if it does, no legal action will
be taken in earnest. Like we see every
time before this, we're being played against each
other. I made that that whole Spider Man
meme, Antifa, Patriot Front, FBI, like, both pointing
each other.
I think that's what's happening.
But the reality, though, I I think at
first and foremost is that this is narrative,
and it doesn't go anywhere. But if it
does, I have them of the mind, it'll
be weaponized against specific people for specific reasons.
Now we're gonna read we'll go over this
article the next time.
But this is, you know, here's Homeland Security.
To be clear, we will not comply with
Gavin Newsom's unconstitutional
mask ban.
Unconstitutional.
Like, guys, they're laughing at you. They're laughing
in your face. The art first of all,
they are required to not wear masks. They
are required to identify themselves, and they are
legally required to, present warrants and and justification.
They're not doing any of those things. And
so now they're passing a bill that simply
enshrines the reality that, yes, they are supposed
to not wear masks, and they come out
and go unconstitutional.
It's not though. Not even remotely. But that
either shows that this Homeland Security, which wouldn't
surprise me, probably Bongino or Casper Patel, they
don't know what they're talking about. They they
they either they don't know that's not unconstitutional,
or they're just lying to you because they
don't wanna identify people who are breaking the
law. And then they say, at a time
when ICE law enforcement faces a 1000%
increase in assaults, guys, that is verifiably not
true. I mean, like, they're it the the
the there it's like the way they created
every other point of these narratives.
They they take, like, every Palestinian flag and
they claim they're all terrorists.
This
completely collapses with the smallest amount of scrutiny.
There I mean, look. Are there people reacting?
Probably more so now because what they're doing
is illegitimate, illegal. And there's people out there
roaming in fake vests and fake masks claiming
to be police and DHS
or ICE and raping and robbing people. Look
it up for yourself.
So why would anybody allow a random person
with a vest without identifying themselves to do
anything?
So maybe in you know, my bottom line
is even with that, they're not there's not
a thousand percent increase. They're creating justification
to create Gestapo, which is already here.
And now the persistence says, if Antifa is
now a terrorist organization,
that means any group that funds Antifa is
material supporting a terrorist organization. You see how
dumb that gets? So if they tomorrow designate
T Lab a terrorist organization, that means you're
all terrorist funders now?
No. Because that's not the reality. This is
just narratives, innate labels being presented to make
a case. But it says, begin combing through
every NGO
with AI.
Should be easy. How so what happens if
tomorrow, all of a sudden,
serious allegations come down for people that were
funding them? Even though that was funding from
before, they and just with an executive order
cast this.
See my point? Or how about this? Tim
Pool says, quick question, Elon Musk. Now that
Trump is formally declared an antifa terrorist, will
x remove accounts claiming allegiance?
You see what he's doing? He tries to
act like he's not calling for that when
it's exactly what he's doing. Getting Elon Musk
to censor people because with antifa conversations or
related in any way because they're all terrorists
now.
Like, that's not exactly what he would freak
out about if it was being done to
somebody on his side. This guy is such
a clown.
It's where we're going. Now I wanna finish
with this point. I think this is super
important.
Now the once most importantly right now, because
the state department seems to be trying to
claim these weren't American citizens, which I guess
it's certainly possible that the the the speaker
of the par of of Lebanon
randomly made that up for no reason. Like,
it is possible, of course. And that there's
many other journalists that have backed up the
fact that they but maybe maybe they're not.
Maybe that was a lie stemming from some
effort to make it more important. I can
understand that
as much as it doesn't seem likely at
this point and that the state department's been
caught lying like I literally just showed you
like 75 times in the last hour. I'm
joking kinda, but the point is they lie
like it's breathing.
I've been long before Trump, but it's gotten
into a cartoonish degree lately.
So that being stated, let's go over this
brief point. So I want you to understand
two things about this.
This is not new. And even if they
aren't, which I think the evidence shows that
they are,
the that Israel has killed Americans many times
just since October 7. They still don't care.
On top of that, so now that you're
admitting that Israel killed three innocent children
because they're not US citizens, we're supposed to
ignore it. Like, there's they're they're they're making
their own they're shooting themselves in the foot
by even defending or arguing the story.
So first,
four US citizens were killed by an Israeli
airstrike in Lebanon on the twenty first. Not
even remotely the first attack illegally on Lebanon,
not even remotely the first violation of their
ceasefire that nobody talks about as Craig Murray
got tired of saying every day, because it's
been happening for a long time, but not
even the first American killed in this context.
Four US citizens killed including three children in
Israel strike, says Lebanese government.
So here's Kash Patel.
Here's what he said
he would do or he that he he
framed himself in the way he would act
should there be Americans here or abroad
that are threatened or killed. Security mission is
equally as important.
Anyone that wishes to do harm to our
way of life and our citizens here or
abroad
will face the full wrath of the Department
of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
And if you seek to hide in any
corner of this country or any corner of
this planet, we will put on the world's
largest manhunt, and we will find you. Oh,
okay. What was the other thing you said
too that, what, no one is above the
law? I guess Tom Homan, that's a anomaly
though. Right? Or any number of other examples
of how you all have broken law or
that Biden administration all broke the law. They're
not in jail. What happened to all the
Democrats you're supposed to arrest? What happened to
all the people you told us were gonna
come screaming down into jail cells? Yeah. I
guess some people are above the law. It's
the government.
It's this is just sad to me. But
the case again
We'll face the full wrath to our way
of life and our citizens It's a threat
to our citizens anywhere or abroad. Here abroad.
Will face the full wrath of the Department
of Justice in the Okay. And then
with and now can I ask an honest
question? Now aside from the very real concern,
watch James Lee's video on this, of his
his girlfriend next to him in the picture
being, you know, working for PragerU. It doesn't
prove anything.
But it is a very clear extension of
that kind of Israel influence network. It's not
hard to see. Many people have argued she's
simply some kind of facade honeypot. You can
decide for yourself. It's the timing seems pretty
weird. Now that's that's not the point. Why
is she in the shot?
Why in the world?
I mean, you don't even see their wives
in these shots, but his girlfriend of a
short period of time is standing next to
him, first line in the shot,
talking about this conversation?
I just find that I mean, I don't
even know how to explain that unless he's
just a like, let's just say it's none
of the stuff that we should concern ourselves
about. It just makes him look like an
idiot. You're gonna literally like, you wanna show
off your girlfriend? It it makes perfect sense,
actually, if you understand who this person is.
But I think it's bigger than
that. So
I said, big talk from cash in this
recent video so so many months ago below
about going after anyone who wishes to do
harm to our way of life or our
citizens here or abroad
after four Americans were just killed by Israel.
Let's see if this was just bluster and
big talk like the rest of what he
has shown. Now this post
resonated with people.
It's still going. 16,000 likes, 3,700
shares.
A lot of people are are red because
it's an important I mean, it shows you
that it's a contradiction. Right? But it also
shows you that there's a lot of people
left and right that are seeing this that
just don't get pointed to in the conversation.
So Mehdi Hasan points this out twenty first
and says, if any other country had just
murdered four Americans,
three of them kids, by the way,
it would be the biggest story in the
news and Trump would be preparing to strike
back. You damn well know it.
And this person has the nerve to say
or the stupidity to say, why in the
world would you take your family to a
war zone?
The ignorance of some people in this, it's
just unbelievable to me. Now who knows? It
could be an Israeli bot. But the point
is that so either you're of the mind
that Americans only exist in this country, and
therefore they had to travel to Lebanon,
or that they were
traveling in the country, or, like, you know,
either either way, they they live in Lebanon,
man. Read the story.
The point is that people don't know.
And Tana Welch rightly points out, well, how
about you investigate these twenty first?
Rachel Corey, for example. Right? Well, I'm gonna
go actually, let me put this off just
a touch because we'll go over that in
a second. The point though, he's right to
point out. He's highlighting my post, and here's
a list of a bunch of other Americans
Israel's killed. What about those? So keep that
in mind with the pushback.
This person says, they weren't Americans.
There's been an update trying to keep
up. Right. Okay.
So I said, funny how the rebels fighting
the deep state now take at at face
value what the government tells them without any
evidence or due diligence. How embarrassing for those
doing so, you.
I mean, because the point is, guys, that
that the the pushback came from the US
government saying that's not true. I'll read it
in the articles coming up next.
No evidence provided.
Nothing that makes sense of why I mean,
they just simply said they didn't even say
it's not true, by the way. They simply
said that does not appear to be the
case. I'll read it to you. So this
Robert Knight, with all the evidence we already
have, simply goes, but they said no. You're
wrong. Liar. Because self serving partisan lie. I
mean, whether it's even true, the point is
he doesn't know for sure. He's going with
what his team says over the data that
we currently have. Because let's be clear. The
evidence, and there is evidence right now, suggests
that they're American citizens. The only thing saying
not is the state department with a clear
interest in not telling you that, saying otherwise.
Typical. Right?
And same point. This is just a guy
responding to the same person saying, the knots
you have to twist to pretend to be
a patriot and reasonable.
He says, these weren't Americans.
The wick worker wasn't American. He's he's not
making fun of them. Anser,
all were Americans to the point.
The US' Liberty sailors, many, molestation victims and
their Epstein ring, Trump and he and cut
you know, the point is all of these
historical evan points of them going after Americans.
Here is the first article from,
ABC.
Four US citizens killed, including three children, an
Israeli strike in Lebanon, says the Lebanese government.
Israeli drone strike in Southern Lebanon killed five
people on Sunday, including three children, Lebanon's health
minister said. The two others were wounded, including
the mother in the family.
Pretty gravely, it looks like too. The Israeli
mill military said it was targeting a Hezbollah
militant,
and that he he he, quote, operated from
within a civilian population.
Nothing backs that up, and they bombed civilian
areas that have been backed up by journalists,
including Craig Murray, by the way, that were
not in a relation to any operation military
wise, was simply civilian buildings that they were
attacking,
which is what they've done all over Gaza,
which is what they've done in Syria. They've
done everywhere if you're just looking for yourself.
And I don't mean I mean, look for
the people reporting this even from mainstream western
sources,
from human rights groups, from
Doctors Without Borders, from you know, it's it's
crazy how much evidence. The bottom line is
that they claimed that it was a one
lone person working within civilians. Well, guess what?
Like we said back in the first time
this happened, that's still a crime. In no
world are you allowed to murder all these
civilians because you think there's a guy there.
That's what they're act that's their argument, guys.
But it says they're reviewing the incident because
clearly they're gonna tell you the truth. Right?
It says Israel frequently this is mainstream Western
media. Israel frequently says it is targeting Hezbollah
militants or infrastructure in the tiny country's battered
southern region.
You know, the very area that they're desperately
fighting overtaking right now. Hezbollah has only claimed
firing across the border once
since the ceasefire.
But Israel says the militant group is trying
to rebuild its capabilities. So the point is
they're trying to clumsily say there without being
too obvious because they're all clearly pulling punches
is that there's no evidence that they've broken
anything. Israel is just
Israel is on a mission to take the
territory. You know why we know that? Because
Smotris will say that. Because Ben Gavir will
say that. Because Netanyahu
will say that. And then we all debate
whether they're doing the thing they're all telling
you they're doing, or that they have an
entire conference for the names they're going to
name these Lebanese areas in Hebrew. But we're
all confused about whether they're real it's insane.
It's it's it's counterintuitive.
They're lying to you while you watch them
say what they wanna do.
And it said and the other part was
the
well, just Lebanon Lebanese parliament speaker,
Niba, Bouri said four of the killed of
the three children
there's four of the killed, the three children
as well as their father held US citizenship.
Officials of the US embassy in Beirut could
not immediately be reached for comment.
Of course, they later then
say
they weren't.
That's it. You read for yourself. It says,
while the situation is fluid,
meaning
not certain,
so far,
indications are see how funny it is for
this guy to go, absolute. They said you're
wrong. They don't even say that. While not
the swallow, it's still fluid, so far, indications
are that the five killed were not US
citizens.
In fact,
one
had an unused immigrant visa petition. Yeah. You
mean the one that wasn't a US citizen?
See see how these people are deliberately trying
to deceive you by saying not for certain,
but the indications don't seem to be so
far that they're all citizens. Nobody said they
were all citizens. They said four of them
were. And they said, well, how we know
is that the one had a visa. Yeah.
Because four of them were, not all of
them.
See, I mean, this is the best they
can do. That's it. That's the story.
So I think it's very obvious that these
were American citizens and your government doesn't care.
And that Israel is bombing them, not maybe
not deliberately, but don't care.
So let's talk about the let's just say
for sake of conversation that that's not true.
They weren't American citizens. Okay. So first point
again. So then it's okay that they just
killed three children?
But if they're not US citizens, we're not
supposed to care about it? I mean, they're
making their own case. They're making your case
for you guys. They're saying, now we're not
American citizens. We shouldn't care. So it's not
a crime. They just executed three children. Yes.
It still is. Like it has been every
other time they've done it. Well, let's just
say they're not American citizens.
Okay? And that maybe didn't even happen. Okay.
Well, how about the endless amount of examples
where Israel has killed American citizens? I shouldn't
say endless, but since October 7 alone.
His name was
Tawfiq Ajik.
He was a 17 year old from Louisiana.
Forgive me if I mispronounce his name. Visiting
his family in Palestine.
He was shot by an Israeli sniper and
settler.
This is Joe Biden's time. Guess what he
did? Nothing.
These are American citizens, guys.
He was visiting his family there. He's lived
in I mean, it just it and nobody
cared.
Now rather the people that have ability to
change it. A lot of us cared.
Randy Fine openly celebrated the idea of killing
this American citizen.
Her name was, again, if I mispronounce it,
I apologize,
Asenjur
n g e g.
During a protest in the occupied West Bay,
not even in Gaza, guys, West Bank,
he tweeted, quote, one less Muslim terrorist
hashtag
fire away.
That's what he wrote about a an American
citizen.
And look, this is even Visberguy 24, which
is a propaganda platform, not a media platform,
says Turkish woman with US yeah. That's a
US citizen, guys. Just because they're playing this
game of diminishing what it means to that's
an American citizen just like you're an American
citizen. Brandy Fine doesn't care. Muslim terror. Fire
away. Why? Because she's in Palestine?
I mean, it just it's insane to me,
but they don't care.
That's allowed.
Israel covered the murder of Shireen Abu Acclaim
with US help. Was a US citizen, was
executed by by Israel.
They lied about it. They said that wasn't
the case, then they got forced to admit.
Well, at first, they said it was them.
They shot her. Oh, wait. No. It wasn't.
It was somebody else, and it ricocheted. Oh,
wait. No. It was the IDF, but it
actually did you know, then it would be
shot her because they were coming at us.
But you go back and you look at
the original story, there's no way you can
look at it and go they were
it's obvious they were lying. You can't look
at where it started and where it ended
up and act like we didn't they were
they were just hoping you would accept a
lie along the way. That's what The US
seems to do right now.
These are American citizens.
Now many of these, except for this one,
these are all post October oh, and and
Shereen.
The other ones are after October 7. So
if you don't think that was American citizens,
it's the same point. What about these ones?
Come on, Kash Patel. Are you gonna go
after the ones going after American citizens abroad?
Clearly not.
Here's Al Jazeera, how US dealt with the
cases of nine Americans killed by Israel
since 02/2022.
Guess what? They didn't do anything
like they never do. Ask Joe Meters, a
a a veteran of the US' Liberty who
was on a flotilla who got arrested and
held, detained by Israel for months, and they
didn't care, didn't say a word. Also have
other flotillas with are getting their way, what
they're calling Hamas, threatening to take them out
of the water. Hey. And according to Trump
and bombing Venezuelan ships without any due diligence,
any process,
how much you wanna bet that happens? Or
Rachel Corey.
Struggle for justice culminates in Israeli courts. There's
an article you can read about it. This
is the story of somebody protesting in the
West Bank, the illegal annexation, destruction of homes,
and they literally ran her over with a
bulldozer.
Despite the game of playing the nuance of
this, if you actually find the video out
there, it is undeniable.
It's a slow, disgusting reality of that person
deliberately killing her because she refused to get
out of the way knowing they'd never be
held accountable
even though your government saw it and didn't
care.
Here is the family from Lebanon.
As Ayesha points out, just like Charlie Kirk,
this man was a father, a husband.
His kids were killed with him in Bint
Jabeel,
Southern Lebanon.
His wife left wounded all American citizens
killed by Israel. Now the wife apparently was
not.
Why why no outrage from Trump or US
media? Some does some lives matter more than
others? Now Robert in Lokesh told me that
ultimately this location
the real general point is that Israel was
trying to create a response from Hezbollah to
justify its ongoing occupation, which is exactly what
I would have thought.
And and what they're doing is trying to
draw out their response
by killing innocent people. It's exactly what Israel's
strategic practice is. Look around.
And and well, and quite frankly, it's what
the US government does with sanctions everywhere else.
But the location is important. The location is
like, his point was he can't independently verify
that they were US citizens outside of the
reports, but he argues the same thing. There's
no reason he can see why they would
lie about it. But, again, we could factor
in why, but it doesn't make sense, and
I agree with him. But, ultimately, the point
is that the location, it's more likely that
would be the case.
But, you know, you it's important to understand
that these are average people living their lives,
Not some terrorist boogeyman they try to make
them out to
be. But that's how this works. You dehumanize
them when you take them out. Now, Tana
Welch
breaks down plenty more. Guys, I mean, these
are all American citizens that were killed by
Israel.
Why doesn't that matter?
Here is the report from September 22. Israel
has violated the ceasefire with Lebanon more than
4,000 times.
The the violation on twenty second was an
airstrike that killed a car full of children
in Ben Jabeel.
These are two of the children.
I
don't
know.
Yeah. I don't, you know, I don't normally
even get into playing stuff like this just
because I feel like it's emotionally manipulative even
though it's true.
But you just have to understand, guys.
These are real children
with real lives.
Right? That that exist that have not not
some Hamas secret tunnel group. These are average
people,
American citizens no less,
who got murdered just because Israel wanted to
cause a reaction.
That's who we're dealing with. That's who your
government supports.
So here's somebody responding to that by post
saying 77,300,000
voters waiting
for just one Democrat to be held accountable
for literally anything.
Now whether you think that's the case or
not, that it should be aimed only the
point is that there's a lot of voters,
even the ones that are on the side
of get the democrats, who are going, but
wait. You haven't done that yet. There's a
lot of noise and action, but where are
the not not the average people with antifa
on the street. Where are the people who
you told us were the big deep state
actors? The one that Jones told you would
already be arrested.
They're working with them. That's what's happening. They
always have.
So I'm gonna leave it there for tonight.
There's a lot of other points we can
get into, and this is about the lies
around the ceasefire deal that, you know, the
what they're trying to use to rationalize this,
or just the last couple points here.
Doctors Without Borders. On some September 15, Israeli
forces fired upon our clearly marked water truck.
The attack cannot be dismissed as an error.
It was a deliberate attempt to sabotage water
to civilians. That's Doctors Without Borders.
Asal Rad, we have reached the point where
Israel shooting at a clearly marked Doctors Without
Borders vehicle to prevent the water delivery
is not even a news story anymore.
That's where we are.
If you can't see what that means about
the Zionist manipulation of the flow of information,
then you're lying to yourself. And if you
then pretend that I meant Jews alone, you're
also lying to yourself. The facts are clear.
That's insane.
Every day. I mean, they even tried to
argue that they're somehow Hamas now. They just
lie. It's the same thing they do every
time.
Confirm that we are seeing single shots to
the head, neck, chest.
My partners down in the emergency room who
are working absolutely tirelessly to stabilize these folks
so they can survive to surgery,
have reported to me that two days ago,
they lost six children
12,
to single shots to the head. This is
worse than anything I've ever seen. The
scale of destruction
is something that I couldn't even comprehend I
got here. There is no more room.
Everyone is living in tents.
Somehow they manage to the Palestinians are incredible.
Somehow they manage to keep water, you know,
trucks running,
garbage trucks running. They're doing everything they can
to maintain their society,
but it's getting harder and harder every day.
You know, it's things like that that just
show me exactly, you know, like, that you
could have so many doctors.
In fact, I'll even grab that,
which I haven't had it to in a
long time. In fact, by the way, I
recently found out that they wouldn't even like,
I could keep posting, but for some reason,
Twitter won't let me continue the thread. I
can't it seems like I can't even make
threads anymore. You know, you could post it
then say continue the thread as opposed to
just commenting, which makes it really hard to
read it all.
Sure. That's completely by weird coincidence. Right?
All of these
are doctors telling you exactly the same thing.
They're murdering children. They're murdering children. They're starving
people to death. They're executing doctors. There's no
Hamas anywhere around us. Over and over and
over and over and over and over and
over, all of them telling you that, and
yet we're debating it.
Let Netanyahu come and talk in front of
congress. No big deal.
Well, I'll leave you with this on the
way out.
Just a piece of it
to understand where we really are. Well, I'm
I'm just gonna play I'm gonna leave you
with a different clip, actually. I'm gonna play
a piece of this.
We're making this video because we couldn't we
could die at any moment, they say. Seventy
to eighty percent of our patients are children,
pregnant women. These are Australian doctors that just
got there.
This is the reality on the ground. Here's
doctor Nada Abadrope and doctor,
Sayazi, which we're doctors from Australia.
We're here in Gaza at the moment.
We arrived in the middle, you know, at
Luxor Hospital first, but the situation was disastrous,
where we're having kind of kids coming,
after a strike with most of most of,
like, let's say, seventy to eighty percent of
our patients are kids and and pregnant women.
Seventy to eighty percent are kids and pregnant
women.
I mean, what do you think? Do you
think it's even possible that this much information
could be out there and not and that
the majority of people don't see it? I
mean, I don't even I I think that
the at this point, it is self evident,
guys. It's the I mean, the every doctor
that comes back, they have families and their
circles and their talk. Everyone is hearing about
this information. It is filtering through with whether
or not their propaganda
machine can control the narrative. And it's also
not doing that. They've lost control of the
narrative months ago,
yet it continues.
As we speak, people are dying from starvation,
from lack of water, from bombing, from rape
and torture, and I'm not making that up.
Every single moment we do this, people are
dying.
It matters if everything you do matters.
Every person you talk to, everything you share,
every social media post
matters
because you're changing people's minds.
Right? I mean, without doing this show, I
I mean,
the bottom line is that every single thing
we do reverberates through the world around us.
And I think right now, it is important
to not just make sure that other people
know that you see it too so they
don't feel stupid and crazy and outside like
in COVID nineteen, but to,
you know, allow that to re to set
the idea of the re the majority to
set in, to not hide from that, to
recognize that with that momentum,
we actually can stop what's happening.
That is what the real lesson is right
now is that that's and really, what I
think they're desperately afraid of us recognizing,
of us realizing that it is a thousand
to one of what really goes on in
this power structure, and that all we have
to do is as just
stop.
It's it's Larkin Rose's point. Right? Eventually, their
arms will get tired.
Just stop.
I I mean, I know it's possible, and
I think the sad thing is that we're
still lost by watching these complete clowns on
social media. Act like everything's great. It's never
been better. We're winning.
We weren't winning when Democrats were there. We're
not winning Republicans are there. We're losing because
the government doesn't care about us. And that's
that's demonstrated to you every day by the
lack of Epstein information, by the ongoing shots,
by everything else that the Biden administration did
the same.
Stand up.
The world needs you to stand up.
Thank you for being here.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
When were you in Gaza?
April
for the first couple weeks, and then there's
sniper bullets. I have children that were shot
twice. Wait. You're saying that children in Gaza
are being shot by snipers? Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately and directly on the side
of the head in the same child. No
toddler gets shot twice by mistake by the
world's best sniper, and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds
to children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined, 40 mission trips, thirty years,
ground zero,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my first week in Gaza. And
when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority, or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb out of eight year
olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced and
the majority of its buildings destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be a,
an orphan
watching your family, you know, melted in front
of you and shredded in front of you?
How do you fix that? Ever fix that?
In fact, so many Palestinian children have had
family members killed that doctors created a shorthand
term,
WCNSF,
wounded child,
no surviving family.