There is another very important phase of warfare.
It has as its target,
not the body,
but the mind of the enemy.
The target of psychological
warfare
is against the enemy's mind.
It is words and ideas. Ammunition
used by a cyber.
Its mission is to influence the thoughts of
the enemy soldier. And at the same time,
is expected and encouraged to study foreign languages
and the social sciences such as history, economics,
and sociology. Divert temperature. He must have a
broad and sympathetic
understanding of all phases of human experience.
Gripping
at my skin.
The walls
of night close in.
While the use of this force as an
integral part of combat
has now taken on new form.
Alright.
Wait. You say
These are the sci war soldiers.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 09/12/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Obviously, a
very important conversation.
And this is not really just about Charlie
Kirk and what happened. Obviously, this is the
focal point of this conversation,
but there are a a much larger conversation
taking place around this. And, obviously,
many, many, many events of the past and
recent events we can talk about,
but a lot of evidence to suggest that
this is a question that we should be
asking. But we've done this kind of format
many times over the years.
And, of course, it's not meant to be
some wink wink, this is the answer. The
reality is always when especially when you see
this framing from from a title from me.
The point of it is exactly what it
sounds like. It's a conversation that clearly is
mired in in partisan manipulation
like most are today,
but there's a lot of evidence around this.
But there's, you know, just,
competing narratives, competing opinions rather, like, from an
honest standpoint.
And so it's important that we have shows
like this where
you know? And, you know, I I'll give
you my opinions. I mean, with this show
like this, I tend to sort of wait
till we get towards the end to give
you my kind of how I see it
all. But overall, my point is that the
more often than not, when we do these,
the answer is we don't know, and it's
up in the air. But the point of
this show is to give you the facts
as I see it. And many of you
know, the facts as we see it, but
many other points that are, you know, subjective,
assumptive. Like, these shows are meant to be,
like, here's the kind of the general point
of all this conversation, all the different points
and and as I see it and what
I can gather. I'm sure there's parts that
we didn't include today, but I did my
best to make it a a large
view.
And what's funny about this before I get
into it today, I sat down today to
do the show, and I
I I was kind of intent on not
making Charlie Kirk the focus. But as, you
know, you know me. It's not about what
like, even that to me would be sort
of, like, not being objective and the other,
like, choosing you know, because everyone else is
looking at it, I will let it like,
as evidence the show is today, I will
let where the information guides me become what
the show is.
But I was you know, I didn't wanna
fall into it. Like, I did the last
conversation. I I forget the, oh, a few
of the last shootings we could talk about.
I like I said, I don't want to
just dive into this this rabbit hole, especially
with every single time we've seen these
as we can talk about this one too.
It becomes instantaneously.
And at this time, like, very
bombastically, like, conspicuously
before we even knew anything who was arrested,
and the narrative was already set. And that
starts to happen every time. And so when
you start diving through these, it's just overwhelmingly
mired and flooded with just, you know, like,
deliberate
nonsense. And I mean, from, like, high level
people as well as just people online. And
so it becomes almost like a you know,
it can feel like it's wasting your time
almost deliberately when there's a lot of other
things going on. So my point at that
time was I'm gonna cover what happens and
and and, you know, report to you what
I see in all this. But the the
moment to moment trying to dive down it
just felt like it was meant to be
distracting. And so I had a similar feeling
in some of the cases here, and I
was going into it today, and I had
a lot of other things that I ultimately
put it off put off some of them.
Many of them that I concluded are very
relevant to the point today,
but I just decided ultimately to
make this the focus. And there's many you'll
see there's more than just points about Kirk
and Israel, but really just made the focus
because it very clearly stood out to me
as
the central point of what we were I
was looking at of everything I had organized
and including things that weren't even about this
point in the conversation, like like we've talked
about. Like, and for the reason we started
with that clip. And this isn't even just
about Israel, but it is clearly, because I
think honest people are starting to recognize despite
the mainstream alternative media effort to make you
look anywhere other than this when it comes
to globalism,
tectocracies, I all the problems we're seeing, that
clearly this is a a global larger than
one country problem.
And you could there's many reasons you could
think, you know, whether it's one place making
that the case or all of them working
together. At that point, it's irrelevant to just
understand
beyond that. It's important to understand that clearly,
this is more than just one location, more
than one group, more than one country. So
when you're we're talking about all this today,
think of it in that context and how
clearly this is something much bigger than one
incident, one country, one agenda.
So
and as we started with, if you remember,
that is the army PSYOP video where they
put out just, you know, proudly telling you
that they conduct psychological operations on you and
everyone in the world every day, and that's
their job. And so just remember that. As
well as that clip, which will play toward
the end of Israel's IDF, Mossad, elements. I
believe it was, you know, a Mossad agent
that was sitting with sixty minutes.
Point blank telling you the world you know,
I mean, let's let me just play this
again.
Because I didn't play the full thing. I
I I wanted the I'm gonna play it
at the end, but but I wanna make
sure that you set this in your mind,
and we're gonna do two,
a Greg Rees clip and something else and
a few cert points before we get right
into it today. And I really it's both
kind of setting the table for this larger
conversation, but also the 09:11. We just went
the the you know, yesterday. And understanding
the very clear reality of that and how
that ties into all these bigger pictures. Not
that big topic, but really just these points
we'll make because that is important to think
about, the timing of all this. And how
realistically when you when you look back,
it's been almost every single year you have
something like this that relate or how Israel
uses this and Israel talks about it. I
mean, you are we still pretending like we
don't know as a matter of fact that
Israel was in one way or another involved
with what took place that day? I hope
not. Sort of like we're pretending like we
don't know that ISIS and Al Qaeda and
elements around this are influenced, controlled, and and
moved around the world by p
like, ice their
Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the rest of it
are Israeli US proxy elements. My point is
these are things that you can quite literally
prove
from documentation to I mean, on and on.
So all of this, thinking about it in
a larger picture. But I'm gonna play this
clip again. So that was my point in
saying that is to understand that this is
a global conversation. This is just Israel for
whatever reason admitting to you that this is
how they see the world. So to pretend
that it's not possible when they're literally telling
you things like this is just simply willful
willful ignorance.
Okay. So I guess that just doesn't wanna
play,
which is fantastic. It's playing. Let me remove
it. Do it again. See what happens. Funny
funny thing to happen today.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have They're talking about the
pagers for those who don't know that they
created
however they put that together and then seeded
into the population of Lebanon and allowed to
circulate for somewhere between five to ten years
depending on who you listen to. They claim
ten.
Ten years. Children, women, which were the
over what? Seventy five percent of them? Eyes,
arms,
deaths,
women and children. That's what they're talking about.
Sixty minutes, and the rest of the world
still praises this like some kind of an
achievement. They killed children, women, in an open
civilian area across the entire country and allowed
it to circulate for enough time to where
they had no idea where it would be.
This is the point about what I always
mention in other context, that this could very
well be happening anywhere else in the world.
An incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that has no way being traced back to
Israel. Exactly. Companies oversell companies who affect the
supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
I mean, how exactly do you get beyond
something like that?
I mean, all the other points as well.
Creating a fake market. I mean, they're quite
literally telling you, of course, you could say
they're lying,
but you can prove these things are happening.
The funny thing is you can prove them,
and when you point to them, people call
you racist. And I'm not even talking about
Jewish people here. We're talking about the Zionist
infiltration, and that's the whole game they play.
And it works very well up until the
last year and a half.
Israel's infiltration of US tech in light of
the Lebanon pager attack, I'll include that because
it's an important show to watch to understand
how much deeper this really goes in that
point alone.
But the start starting point in your mind.
James Corbett and I had a great conversation
back in aug 04/26/2025.
Engineered division
and subservience
under a guise of resistance.
I mean, we are quite literally talking about
what's happening right now. And, you know, it
was happening then to some degree too, but
it has gone haywire today. And the idea
of this and the left does the same
thing of this end this idea that we're
fighting the power, and we're fighting the the
right to the deep state. You know? And
and it's just engineered
division and subservience to the power, which is
really one power, so you all it's all
subservience to the same thing under a guise
of resistance. You put you are being
tricked into, if you're being honest out there,
if, you know, if you are an honest
person, being tricked into feeling like you're resisting
the problem when you are actually building it.
As I see it, it's a good interview
to think about, but keep that in mind,
the possibility at the very least. And I'll
include this show we did about fifth generation
warfare, which is clearly where, as I started
with that clip, where this overlaps in my
mind, psychological operations.
As
these governments, Israel and United States in particular,
lead the world, in my opinion, in the
way that they carry these out, how often
they do them, and the willingness to conduct
them in ways that are, I
mean, quite a far away from international law.
This was called drones, fog, false flags, and
political destabilization because that's what was happening at
the moment, but, really, just the the larger
point. This is where we are, fifth generation
warfare. Now few more points to keep in
mind is before we get into one clip
and then start the larger conversation.
Drop site news came out with this. This
is from the eleventh, September 11. Leaked email
show Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison coordinated with
ex Israeli military chief Benny Gantz on a
2015
he's ex now, by the way, was the
case then, counter
BDS initiative
seeking
$1,000,000
each from 12 prominent Jewish philanthropists to fund
state of the art cyber technology as a
soft weapon and hire private intelligence firm, Black
Cube.
See? Black Cube, Black Rock, black oh, Black
Stone.
Where was it? To spy on and sabotage
activists.
The archive, published by,
excuse me, Handala and verified by Jack Paulson,
all source intelligence, show Ellison offered help as
a core American supporter of the effort.
Right. That's the whole, you know, APAC. We're
Americans kind of game. BDSNA director Olivia
Katby said the, emails show Ellison offering assistance
to a foreign government to spy on Americans.
And just to clarify that last point, to
be if you are born in this country
or have American citizenship, you're an American. Case
that's being conflated with the part we make
about immigration. My point in saying that here
is the idea when it comes to something
in regard to intelligence. You're sure as hell
an American citizen, but you're liable for, you
know, like APAC, for example. You can be
registered as a foreign agent, right, because of
the way that's set up and because it's
clearly an Israeli
entity from its core. And you can look
this up on Wikipedia for crying out loud.
But, nonetheless, there can be Americans that are
involved. See, it's it's the point is the
reason I'm saying that is the way I
heard that out of my mouth, people would
try to frame that as the conversation of
immigration, which is relevant today. That there are
people out there that many of the people
we're gonna talk about today who are hell
bent on claiming that you're not a real
American if you don't have the certain ideas
they do, or a real American if you
are naturalized and have bad ideas about Israel,
or a real American if you are just
simply not from here. It's it's disgusting, and
it's and they're wrong in principle, in reality.
The whole point of this country is we
pretend today and should be is that we
are allowed to have different ideas, including that
we think this country is terrible.
Not to say that's even my opinion. I
think the government's bad. I think the country's
fantastic. My point is that you're allowed to
think that. Today, as we'll get into, the
very people screaming free speech are the ones
trying to shut down conversation that they find
out, you know, disgusting, bad, wrong, unacceptable.
So they are the very snowflakes today regardless
of how dangerous the conversation is, how serious
they are in their mind. They are the
snowflakes up today. It's the same point.
But my point in this is that you
have an example of a high level person
in regard to media, but it's everywhere else
you look, making agreements with high level Israeli
intelligence or in this case, you know, government,
but intelligence as well to counter information, critics,
activists, content.
Very important to think about because it's a
very it's an important frontline for Israel's battle
right now.
On top of that, this one I found
this this deserves an entire, like, a deeper
discussion in a future show.
WikiLeaks
on the September 11. Interesting time to put
this out. Visa ban. Classified cable shows Israeli
organized crime
has been infiltrating
The United States
for years.
Make sure that gets out there. Israel, a
promised land or organized cry for organized crime.
This is really interesting to me. Now the
the the, cable's included. You can look through
it. There's a bunch in there that in
addition to this, and I I plan on
coming back to this. But as it simply
says, as they highlighted, organized crime in Israel
has now now has a global reach. Interesting,
you'll find that it's overlapped with the SBU
and and Russian,
organized crime, which it won't be surprising for
those that know deeper connections around a lot
of this conversation. And it says which direct
impact inside The United States or excuse me.
With.
They're literally telling you that for WikiLeaks, by
the way, which I think matters in this
conversation, that Israel's organized crime has gone so
large that it's global with its influence and
has direct impact
inside this country. You have to understand. That
means politics, guys. That's what that's talking about.
And then it says, nevertheless,
it is fair to assume that many of
the organized crime figures hold valid tourist visas
to The United States and travel freely. So
that's the point they made that, you know,
travel ban. Right? So here they are focusing
on all these different points, really just people
that are
against Israel or a certain skin color or
certain you know, very clearly selectively applied. However
you see it playing, whatever you think is
driving it. And they're letting organized criminals come
in and out. Any anything overlap through the
Israeli side of this is getting a fast
track. Plenty of people have pointed that out,
including immigration, by the way. As such, Israelis
who are known to work for or belong
to organized crime families are not automatically ineligible
to travel to United States,
even though they know they're connected to organized
crime because they're Israeli. Let's not forget, we
just talked about this in many different examples.
Israeli IDF members
are considered the same as US personnel in
the military.
We just talked about this. I I was
blown away when I saw that. That's that's
US legislation,
which I know that that's how serious this
is and how immersed it is, but I
hadn't even seen that.
That's insane to me, the en route.
In in regard set in law, they claim
that an IDF member, in in, you know,
in material sense, is the same legally in
this kind as a US military personnel.
Treated the way legally I mean, it's just
wild to me. And so you say these
things and people act like that can't be
true. I I did an entire show about
it right from congress.gov.
It's just wild. But the point here, again,
was this mindset. So if we talk about
organized crime, if we talk about
infiltrating
media
and controlling content, you know, from the military
high level positions, funding attacks on critics,
how do we not see how easily this
could add up to any number of things
we're discussing? Now this is just subjective. Right?
Not to say that anything like this would
ever prove somebody shot Charlie. We know you
know, that that's not where we're going with
this. When we'll go when I go into
points that I think are relevant, like, material
to the actual, you know, this is evidence
regarding the shooting, we'll talk about it. But
these, as always, are just superficial points that
add up to the reality of a situation,
which we have to acknowledge. Like, Daniel McAdams,
for example, is having a lot of conversation
about this on Twitter, and rightly so, pointing
out things that are obvious. Here is but,
you know, this is this if you have
to question who benefits, Israel is benefiting from
this. And people are outraged. How dare you?
And is that not true?
The ideal you're you're insinuating it's Israel. Well,
you're right. I am. But that's the point
is that we don't know yet, and we're
waiting for the evidence. But can you you
know, it's frustrating that people are pushing back
on fundamentally obvious things that you can actually
prove because it brushes up against a topic
that makes them feel racist. I don't even
know in many per the minds of people
today and what's kind of I think largely
because they've been trained to push back on
it. But my point is that, clearly,
this is relevant when you understand that they
are conducting
psychological operations all around the world. And I'm
gonna end with the point today, which we've
been over many times, which is that Israel
has proudly said and I'll show you the
document directly from the Knesset. I made sure
I had that today. That they can legislate
anywhere in the world, direct quote, and that
they are not bound by international law. They've
said this many times. So keeping all of
this in mind.
Oh, and I want to point out that
Harrison Smith had shared this clip by the
way. I'm pretty sure they they must watch
the show. I'm I'm I'm honored. I'm honored
that they're fans of the show. But the
point is oh, and this clip but I'll
I'll I'll come back to this when we
start, is to think about this as we
go into it. Hegseth says Pentagon, quote, tracking
service members,
civilians
who celebrate Charlie Kirk killing.
Who didn't see that coming?
Well, let's watch this clip about
nine eleven false flags and it the America's
greatest ally from Greg Reese.
There were many involved in nine eleven.
The Pentagon,
the executive branch, and the CIA,
and several people with prior knowledge were heavily
invested and made small fortunes when thousands were
murdered that day by their own government.
And then there was Israel.
The dancing Israelis
who posed for pictures in front of the
burning towers told the FBI that Israel now
has hope that the world will understand us.
The news media caught the same sentiment from
a smiling Israeli girl on nine eleven.
Well,
big catastrophe,
and, I'm Israeli.
And I hope that now people understand what
we have to deal with, the kind of
people that we're dealing with on a day
to day basis.
Over a 100 Israelis were arrested after 09:11.
They were trained in military intelligence
and explosives,
posing as art students with fake IDs and
infiltrating
government buildings.
And they were all let go, including over
a dozen who were living in the World
Trade Center as part of the World Views
artist in residence program.
They occupied Floors 90 And 91
where walls were unfinished
and structural beams were exposed.
The same floors that American Airlines
flight 11
crashed into later that year.
The US government response to nine eleven was
to destabilize
the Middle East and to start viewing the
American people as domestic terrorists.
This is known as a false flag and
often involves a government being complicit in the
murder of its own people and then blaming
it on an enemy as an excuse to
justify war.
At one point I'll add really quickly.
We're gonna get to in in somewhere down
the show here that it was very clearly
a mind a mindset push from Israel on
in Israel influencers like Ben Shapiro
after October 7 to shift into
the we're being invaded, immigration,
kind of, you know,
that mindset and and from a global sense.
And, clearly, we saw that increase. It was
already happening. But so the idea here is
turning you into the terrorist, creating the idea
that, you know, all all of this is
was seeded immediately after that. And my point
in saying that is that you can see
from his point here
that Israel is stepping into this to drive
the idea through this country. And, look, that's
not even see, Netanyahu
is welcomed into congress to speak in front
of them every time he wants, and he's
constantly on US corporate media, and he's seeding
the narratives that he wants people to see.
Usually, you can quite literally prove that he's
lying.
As domestic terrorists.
This is known as a false flag and
often involves a government being complicit in the
murder of its own people and then blaming
it on an enemy as an excuse to
justify war.
This is what nine eleven was, and it's
what ten seven was.
Israeli intelligence and the IDF
had detailed knowledge of Hamas' plan weeks before
October 7.
IDF units were moved from Gaza where the
attack occurred just days before the attack.
Israel's state of the art surveillance system somehow
didn't work that day, and hours went by
before a proper military response.
Every terrorist cell we know of seems to
be associated with the CIA,
Mossad, and MI six.
Nine eleven was blamed on CIA asset Osama
bin Laden, and Hamas is no different. Netanyahu
has made it clear on multiple occasions that
he supports Hamas, and the evidence shows that
they are also a creation of the intelligence
agencies.
A former director of Israel's intelligence agency,
Shin Bet, says they helped Hamas hold power.
We did something very, very simple.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
So what we did, with the permission of
our prime minister is to
let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000
And to make sure
that they will be able to send, you
know, people to work in Israel
and to achieve or to get
intelligence if they need.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
And a former prime minister of Israel confirms
this.
So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas
to try to prevent a Palestinian state? Yeah.
Sure. He deliberately and systematically
even even told this on record
whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of
paying protection money to the Hamas.
Having helped to build up Hamas,
Netanyahu has now vowed to destroy it.
Greg Rees reporting.
Now, yes, that's all very important information,
you know, background setting. Right? Now understand for
those that might already be you know, there's
there's a there's kind of a
a a undercurrent in that conversation of people
that push back on the idea that Netanyahu
funded or Israel funded Hamas.
Now as he says that, you you know,
the the argument, they're a creation of it.
People dispute this. I'm Robert and I have
had deep conversations about this, and it's it's
you could make you could say that's not
an invalid statement, but there's nuance to it.
The point I'm making today to not to
go into that whole conversation is that understand
that
the proof is the evidence is there that
they did do this in many cases right
up until 2020 and beyond. So the point
being is that knowing that does not then
invalidate the reality of the armed resistance. If
an occupied territory that is Gaza, they have
a legal right to armed resistance in the
Geneva Convention. That's a fact. So regardless of
that, it still was a legal act that
they carried out. But the point is you
also don't know the reality of that influence,
whether it was some, all, a few, whether
they took it and didn't care. You know,
it's understand that. The point is not that
it invalidates the reality of Gaza fighting back
against the occupation. It shows you that Netanyahu
is or Israel, but Netanyahu in that point,
is wildly dishonest. They were to the point
they will literally fund the very thing they're
using to justify killing people under the guise
that they're a part of that. It's just
absolutely shocking when you think about it. But
understanding all of that background, not just that
tense not just October '11, and plenty of
other examples from The US, from Israel, from
The UK, all of them conduct themselves this
way. It's very easy to prove. But in
regard to the nine eleven suspects dancing Israelis,
none of you know, look nowhere other than
James Corbett to understand how easy this is
to prove for those that heard that point
and don't know about this. The evidence all
documented,
you know, highly sourced with the videos that
show it, the news reports on corporate media
that talk about it. You know? And then
the fact that they went back to Israel
and on corporate media admitted that they were
there on a Assad mission. It's actually insane
how clear this is, and they very clearly
were there to document. That's what they said.
So understanding that, again, after this today, we're
gonna get into the point. And some of
that was just about generally that we've just,
you know, passed nine eleven again, but really
the idea of psychological operations.
So Hegseth again saying the Pentagon is tracking
service members, civilians who celebrate Charlie Kirk killing.
Keep that in mind as we go through
the show today, as well as the idea
of psychological operations.
So starting with this general
the the the the concept or rather the
the reporting up to now from last time
we talked about it. And this is as
of today,
Tyler Robinson
is the person that we're being told has
been arrested as the shooter. Now there's clearly
a lot of discrepancy. There's clearly a lot
of pushback.
Just like like last time, I think largely
from the Republican party, interestingly enough. And it's
not they see they're not unjustified. There's a
lot like with the Butler shooting, this seems
like a very weird kind of patch together.
That doesn't necessarily mean that the story they're
telling you is false, but it very clearly
suggests that there's something else under, whether it's
you know, as always and here's the best
thing to, like, to think about in the
sense that we always like to assume what
seems to kinda fill the gap we're looking
at or what makes the most sense to
us. But it could be as simple as
just that they're covering up money changing hands
or that they're they did something they don't
want you to see because they're incompetent and
you know, not that that's what I think.
I'm just saying the possibility of them feeding
you some kind of an inconsistent story could
add up to any number of things.
But, clearly, today, there's much more to this
story. Now let's go through this to get
you set for, like, the current reality of
the corporate media story behind this. Facing capital
murder and weapons charges. Details emerge about alleged
Charlie Kirk assassin. So 22 year old Tyler
Robinson was his name from Utah. Governor Spencer
Cox announced this on Friday. Cox and Robinson
con confessed to a family,
family member.
Excuse me.
Yeah.
Cox and Robinson confessed to a family member
who reached out to said. That's what I
was confused. Robinson
confessed to a family member who reached out
to a friend Thursday night,
who then contacted the Washington County Sheriff's Office.
So it's funny, but right now, if you
are only getting your information through just Twitter,
even if it's from sources, you know, like
corporate media or anybody else,
it's wild how much misinformation
flies around and gets kind of folded in
even to people at the highest level.
So right now, there's, like, for example, like,
there was, like, a part of the ladder
story. Those different points that people were just
blindly reporting and repeating and circulated that are
now being proven to not even be that,
like, the ladder is put thereafter. Right? It's
just very strange. So in this case, the
idea that his father turned him in and
it was, like, some kind of a big
deal, it turns out, at least as they're
reporting now, which we should question everything, is
that ultimately it was something they agreed to,
which is actually very relevant to me that
the father
spoke to the son and convinced him to
turn himself in as they're reporting and then
through a minister as they'll report in a
second, ended up calling his contacts because, like,
he's related to the marshal service or something
like that. And so that's interesting to me
because if this was more of a Patsy
situation, it seems like an odd series of
events. But remember, this is still the report
coming from the corporate media. Now
it says,
after they turned himself in, they contacted the,
the arrest brought to an end a thirty
three hour manhunt, FBI director Kash Patel said.
Everyone, as always, fixating on the thirty three,
which is not on it's not it's not
not relevant. I just you know, the point
is it's just an it could pop up
coincidentally. So as an objective person, you never
really know. But I find it funny that
it's something that he's referencing. And it refer
it it relates to a a, Freemason concept
for those that have no idea what that
is. But it tends to pop up in
things that people
consider at the very least, rightly so, whether
there's a, you know, kind of a nod
to something. But either way, it's funny because
it has been sort of reiterated a lot
of points. The suspect is said to be
listed as a potentially unaffiliated,
although both his parents are Republicans.
So this is really interesting to me. So
even still remember, we'll get into this more
in a second, but the reality of how
instantaneously,
even people like Donald Trump, still to this
point, but
in the minutes after this, before anybody been
caught, or because they saw a white guy
getting arrested, everyone said boomer,
liberal, and we know it's crazy lunatic liberals.
That's obviously the point. And then and then
then that guy wasn't the guy, and they
all just kept saying it. And and in
between the time they even arrested somebody,
they were all just going, we know it.
Liberals, we know it. It just felt I
mean, everyone with a brain was going, that's
really,
I mean, just either just blind political
agenda
using this person that you claim to support
or
something else.
I mean, you just have to be honest
about how dishonest that is and how control
I mean, you are forcing in your political
agenda before we even know the facts
of who he was or whatnot. And then
now it turns out his family was Republican.
That doesn't mean he's still not liberal. But
the evidence at this point seems to be
that it's unaffiliated
and what people are using as subjective points
to make this case while ignoring, of course,
that his family Republicans making a narrative about
that. My point is we don't know. But,
you know, here's a picture with a mask
on so that we must he must be
a liberal other than the fact that there's
plenty of Republicans that I know that wore
mask or that he hates Trump or made
some costume with the Trump thing. Yeah. I
know plenty of Republicans that rightly so see
Trump as a fascist, and it's not wrong
to call him that because so too is
Biden. Right? It's just crazy the game that
gets played, but it's about trying to fit
it into your narrative.
And, of course, the Republicans that are doing
that, interestingly, are the ones that are now
blindly taking the government narrative. Funny how things
switch around, isn't it?
Cox said the suspect arrived on the campus
of Utah Valley University on Wednesday at 08:29AM
in a gray Dodge Challenger.
He was wearing a plain maroon T shirt,
light shorts, and a black hat with a
white logo as seen in surveillance videos. He
wore the same clothes when he was arrested,
which clearly means, when you look at everything
they're showing you, that he
changed his clothes and then changed back.
That's one point people are making up that
are are pointing to that doesn't add up
very much. Anything's possible, as well as the
gun we'll get to. And the the
point apparently he took it apart and then
put it back together before he put it
back down. And I guess the scope was
backwards when they got it, which, you know,
clearly, we'll get into all this. Anomalies everywhere.
But so we're the same close.
So with all that we're talking about and
all we're gonna get into, think about these
points and the timing and how unlikely some
of these may seem as we go through
it. Utah voting information seen by the independent
shows his voter status is inactive.
See, to me,
it still, even with that, he could be
liberal, democrat you know,
republican or democrat. We don't know. But the
data points, to me, lean towards somebody who
is seeing the two party illusion, quite frankly.
Not that that's anything good because if he
did kill this person, that's not something we
wanna associate with. But the point is, nonetheless,
them trying to force it into one side
or the other when really it could be
somebody who's so outraged about the entire thing
if this is the way this really went
down that he decided to take a rational
action, which is funny that both sides make
that point when they wanna point to the
other side. The Liberals are making everybody go
crazy and causing violence. We gotta shut them
down. The Republicans are making everybody go crazy
and we're causing violence. We gotta shut them
down. What's the common thread? Oh, they gotta
shut down social media and, you know, take
action to stop the bad guys on the
other side, but it seems to end up
affecting everybody simultaneously.
Weird.
Amazing how easy that is to see. But
what's crazy to me is clearly, it is
all of it. Right? And I'm not saying
in any way that you that we should
think that's okay.
No. And never am I advocating for violence.
It's a crime. People should be held accountable
for it, especially when you take somebody's life.
Right? Somebody with a family and people regardless
of any of that. It's a crime, and
that's a horrible act.
But, obviously,
the
you you can understand why somebody might get
driven to a crazy place with how crazy
things are today for both
sides. Both sides screaming at you to somehow,
like,
not even subtly,
to somehow take some kind of violent action
against the other side in some abstract way
because we're fighting for our very freedom. We're
fighting for our very lives because they're gonna
destroy the world because they're gonna let climate
change end the planet because they're you know,
it's like all of it is fever pitch
all the time.
That's why I'm calling out people like Jones
so often these days because that's what they're
doing. We'll get to it. You know? And
yet they're pointing at each other's side. And
what's funny is when you prove it one
side or the other,
you say, well, look. This is the case.
You're calling them the end of the world.
They go, that's because they are.
Oh, I see. So you're doing the same
thing, but it's okay because they're actually that
bad. Well, even if that's the case, the
point is you're still why wouldn't you then
be the thing you're pretending they should be,
which is not the hyperbolic irrational kill everybody
because
it's just it's it is insane what's happening
right now to a very like, a degree
that I'm not even used to.
So unaffiliated,
inactive
in regard to politics. However, family members said
Robinson had become more political in recent years,
which I think so too of most people.
Part of the agenda, I think. We saw
what did I what's that article I wrote
after
Trump's first administration?
I think I wrote it right after he
got elected and I said the you know,
something about awaking a dumb sleeping giant, which
I was the point was
the many people and it wasn't necessarily meant
to be that they're stupid, but rather people
that had never been really politically active who
got kind of wrapped into the Trump thing
and how he was different. And I'm the
same with you. I'm a normal guy. And
you've got this massive portion of people who
suddenly got super invested in politics. And and
it had its own reaction on the other
side of the same people came in coming
in to push back on that. And so
you got this massive
rise in people that had really no idea
what was truly going on in most senses,
but felt like the world started right then.
And they know everything about Paul. They know
everything about the narratives and the conspiracy there.
And so that's what I think is a
large part of this.
And, where was I on that? It goes,
yeah. The the more political in recent years
is that I think we got people got
kind of driven into
this very thing we're all dealing with, and
I think we can all see why. The
byproduct of what this overwhelming thing is doing
to people, especially those that aren't steeled against
how crazy this can be.
And it says,
a family member told authorities that Robinson was
full of hate and spreading
hate.
So, you know, the the if this is
the person they're claiming shot him, that he's
full of hate and spewing hate, and it's
largely oh, I I think I jumped right
there. It says
oh, yeah. This is important. Family members said
that he had become more political in recent
years and expressed negative views of Kirk.
So, again, taking this at face value as
the reporting that any we should always question.
But as far as the evidence goes and
everything else we're seeing, this appears to be
accurate that's been, you know, verified by more
than one person. And, ultimately, the idea is
that he got radicalized
by Kirk and other political figures, that's what
they're claiming, and started spewing hate and negativity
about it, which that's the idea from both
sides we're talking about. I think both sides
of this false paradigm
driving people to become more radicalized.
And that's not that in no way should
mean they, you know, free speech shall not
be infringed. Any that's the always the case.
The point is that they're using the thing
while pointing at you and shutting down your
speech
while they're the ones ultimately driving people to
this point. Don't forget the psychological point. And
god knows what else we're dealing with today
in the technocratic technological side. But it says,
he revealed that the family member told investigators
that a recent family dinner, he had mentioned
Kirk and the upcoming Utah event.
And, quote, they talked about why they didn't
like him and his viewpoints that he asked
that he had. Robinson's father, Matt, recognized him
from images, which I do find interesting because
I don't really feel like the image that
they show looks it looks I mean, it
could just be that, you know, I it
just it feels like it looks slightly different
than the one that is out there, but
it's hard glasses, hat. You know? You don't
know. You guys can sign up for yourself.
But he says the father recognized him from
those images and encouraged him to turn himself
in. A law enforcement official told us to
a Associated Press. He refused at first, but
then changed his mind according to the official
who spoke on the condition of anonymity to
discuss an ongoing investigation. I hate that that
always happens because that leaves you going, well,
you know, why wouldn't they say who they
were? I it's just it it very clearly
is they don't wanna be held accountable for
what they're saying, which seems to suggest there
might be some level of untruth to it.
The father had reportedly contacted their youth pastor
who sometimes worked with US marshals. The pastor
called authorities to arrange for him to turn
himself in.
So, you know, that undermines the the radical
maniac point that they're trying to drive in,
you know, that he
decided to turn himself in, wracked with guilt.
You know, it's interesting. That that's how it's
being presented anyway.
Shell casings, and this is what I find
so frustrating.
We'll play the clip next. This this argument
that it was trans something on the
I mean, why I think because of what
just took place, because of this clear left
right discussion around that one issue, which is
clearly something we've covered a lot, but it's
being used like everything else. Shell casings found
with the rifle were engraved with messages that
included,
if you read this, you're gay, l n
a o.
In what world would that be something like
a that's that's your that's an insulting thing
for somebody who was in that position. Calling
somebody gay as an insult and laughing about
it. It's not but this is they're just
lazily folding this into something that makes sense
for them. And it says, and, quote, notices
bulge, o w o, what's this? And this
is one read, hey, fascist catch,
with with an up arrow symbol, right, right
arrow symbol and three down arrow symbols. Another
said, oh, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao. Again, an
apparent reference to Bella Ciao, an Italian song
dedicated to those who fought against fascism in
World War two. However, both Bella Chau and
the arrow symbols could be references to the
video game Hell Dry Hell Divers.
So, you know, it it and this is
what they're turning into. And even the writing
on it, all of this. I mean, I'm
questioning
whether or not that even like,
the consistency with which we keep seeing these,
the writing on the same style, on the
guns in the same way, with the man
like, I'm waiting for the manifesto to pop
up, and it's the same kinda thing. It
just doesn't make sense to me that it
would be so consistent, even with, like, social
contagion.
But this does not add up to what
they're calling it. Let's just I find that
insulting to our intelligence like so many other
things they're doing, and I'll play that for
you next. The suspect was seen on video
arriving on campus at 11:52AM.
From there, he moved through stairwells and onto
a roof, the investigators said. He was later
seen moving across the roof and jumping off
the building to flee, which is interesting to
me because the video shows him jumping off
the roof, and yet there are even main
reports that are talking about the ladder he
was used to climb down. It feels very
reminiscent of what we saw at Butler.
In many ways,
investigate investigators have gone into the nearby neighborhoods
to collect any doorbell camera footage. I just
wanted to I wanted to comment on that.
I wonder if they're even asking. Like, is
this I give me if you know in
the chat, let me know or let one
of the mods know and let them get
back to me with it. Just if like,
in this kind of situation, are they, like,
demanding people give that up? Because you know
what? We told you so. Right? It's exactly
where this goes. But I just hate that
idea that it's just people are just willfully
allowing themselves to become surveillance for the for
the state.
Mason also urged the public to avoid harassing
two persons of interest who were detained in
the immediate aftermath of the shooting, but later
released. Now I find this weird.
The way that it frames in this article
so remember, there was the guy in the
blue shirt. They released apparently one other.
And don't forget. I mean, this alone should
be enough for you to question the current
mainstream alternative media push. They all did the
same thing. Look. We knew it liberal before
they even knew what that guy was. And
then he wasn't the guy, and they all
just kept going with it and waited for
the next move. And they just the narrative
didn't even shift.
And
even though this guy isn't even
proven to be a liberal, it just seems
you know, it's that's so irresponsible.
But it says,
one of the two people detained was an
older man seen in photos that you we
just talked about, the blue shirt, which circulated
online shortly after the killing. Officials said he
had been charged with obstruction
by university police.
The other man had been initially described by
officials as a person of interest but was
let go. I just think that's interesting. And,
honestly, it could be a a nothing that
the remember the video, which just makes me
mad about where we are in this country
right now, that the guy was simply saying,
I'm you know, I think he was repeating,
I have a right to remain silent. That's
what the guy was saying and other things.
If you if there's sure there's more to
it. And so my point was that clearly,
he's just going like, I have rights. I'm
not gonna just you know, I and that's
what I would do too. I don't care
what the circumstances
are. Give me my lawyer. I'm not saying
a word. I don't care if it's a
traffic stop. I don't care I'm not saying
a word. And if you know enough, then
you should understand why that's important today.
My point though
is clearly they just charged him with something
anyway. You know, even though he wasn't the
guy and they were arresting him for being
something he didn't even do. You know, I
just I just hate where we are in
this country with that regard, and that's being
driven
by both sides of the paradigm.
So here's the clip where they're
framing this as some kind of trans and
Antifa writing. Antifa you know, I go look,
guys. Just because somebody calls somebody a fascist
does not make them Antifa. Now very well
he could be. I'm not saying he's not.
What I'm saying is this the lazy overlaps
that are happening at the highest levels of
power need to show you that something's amiss.
The idea that Antifa can be you know,
the Belichick I mean, look. I'm gonna get
into this in a second more. Of all
these people going, here's who set this up,
showing
Cain McCain or, Tim Kaine calling him a
fascist.
Really? Are you guys that so you're the
snowflakes now to claim that him calling Trump
a fascist is enough to blame him for
somebody else going after Trump? Guys, I can
show a thousand videos of you guys saying
far worse about everybody on the left as
a broad stroke or specifically about Obama or
Kamala. You know? It's just it's just lazy
logic or just direct complete
manipulation, like, trying to deceive people.
Either way, the point is to show you
how it's very clearly coming from both sides
of the paradigm. But let's watch this first
about them driving this in for the reason
that it seems to kind of shove it
into one side of the paradigm.
In a dark colored towel.
The rifle was determined to be a Mauser
model ninety eight thirty aught six caliber it's
30 aught six caliber bolt action rifle. The
rifle had a scope mounted on top of
it.
Investigators noted inscriptions that had been engraved on
casings
found with the rifle.
Inscriptions on a fired casing read
notices,
bulges,
capital o w o. What's this question mark?
Note that that's,
my my low was kind of over, but
that's that's, Kash Patel there. I'm gonna comment
that in a minute. There's a whole thing
about you know, I'll get into it in
a second, but and it's weird that he
didn't speak.
Inscriptions on the three unfired casings read, hey,
fascist exclamation point,
catch exclamation point.
Up arrow symbol, right arrow,
and,
symbol, and three down arrow symbols.
A second unfired casing read, oh, Bella Chow,
Bella Chow, Bella Chow Chow Chow.
And a third unfired casing read, if you
read this, you are gay,
l m a o. I mean, how in
the world are you gonna pretend in a
dark
It just kills me. You know? It's just
such such abstract, you know, and it it's
everywhere you look right now.
And it's embarrassing. Right? And it really is
from an American perspective and how the world
sees us. There's plenty of people pointing this
out today. Like, it's a cartoon right now,
people watching what's happening in this country. Now
I'll I'll include the FBI post about this,
which has the video, again, showing him come
off the roof with no ladder and everything
else, the images they post with it of
him, which shows that it's, you know, I
guess I guess you could say that's black
pants as well, but the different clothes than
what they claim they saw him in to
start and then what they saw him in
when they got him. So that that that
either suggests that he somehow managed to change
his clothes, which he has a backpack. It's
not that crazy, or it's the wrong person.
That's one of the points is I actually
think this guy does not really represent resemble
the picture of of, which is right here
actually.
But again, it's, you know, low slow light,
a little bit less resolution, which I always
find strange. I mean, we know what they
have capable of today, whether or not it's
other people's cameras or not that they can
they can make better, but you could think
about that. But it's just strange. I don't
think that
truly looks like him. But it there's it
resembles, but you guys can decide. Now this
this is all small stuff, just opinions. So
but I'll include this for you to go
through. You can read it for yourself.
Now I just wanna put this is just
something something somebody posted. I thought this video
was worth watching just for your own
education on this or understanding.
And I just think this is an interesting
video.
And all all it shows you is I'll
I'll let it speak for itself. The same
as speaking to his family. It's just it's
regular stuff.
K.
Congratulations.
You have been selected to receive the resident
presidential scholarship from Utah State University. The value
of this scholarship is approximately $32,000.
This scholarship is available for four years or
eight semesters.
Now the reason I think that's just important
to play is to just, you know, that
I mean, very much speaks to a regular
person, and there's a lot of that going
around. And I think that's important to think
about. You know, that it it's because, you
know, a lot of things tie these kind
of situations that people are immediately asking, like,
was it entirely fake? Was that you know,
was this somebody that's connected back to intelligence?
And these are not unfair questions despite how
ridiculous these, you know, these people out there
gaslighting everyone even though they likely know you're
right in some cases, but to pretend like
you're so crazy for asking those things. Like,
by the way, like, the right seems to
do when things like this happen and they
don't want you to know that, you know,
that's his like, Butler or other things, they
act like now now you're the conspiracy theorist.
But it's it's worth asking these things. And
I think what's interesting there is just to
see that this is a you know, it
seems like a normal kid with a family
who, you know, is going to college. So
the question
is, what did happen if that's the guy,
which the evidence does seem to point in
that direction right now? Is it ultimately, that
would he suggest, which the right is largely
saying that he was radicalized in college, which
certainly could be the case. But let's realize
that this is if you understand the bigger
picture, it's not it's it's it's one part
of a problem reaction solution dynamic. I think
that's very obvious. But or the alternative is
that there's something else that drove his mindset.
And I think more likely than not, it's
it's the it's the where the world is,
the way politics are, the, like, I mean,
incessant
propaganda, social especially if you're tapped in. You
got an Amazon Echo and whatever else. I
mean, and on top of that, COVID nineteen
and injections and and nanotechnology,
whatever else is going on in the world.
Or how about we just keep away from
the things that some people might dis you
know, that's the case. But how about just
things like, you know, the incessant propaganda,
the antidepressants and pharmaceuticals that are everywhere, or
the things in, you know,
endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are also very clearly
proven to show psychological effect. You know, all
of these things have an effect, hypothetically speaking.
And so the idea that somebody might, on
top of all of that, just be kicked
over the edge by watching people do things
that they have been convinced will destroy the
entire country? On that point, I agree with
them. But my point is it comes from
both sides. That you are driving people to
a fever pitch telling them that these people
are trying to literally destroy your country. That
if we don't do something now, we'll never
be able to do it again. And that
drives people
very clearly. On the other side, you can
see the same kind of thing from climate
change or any number of other points.
And I really don't even include in that
calling them fascist or saying that they're even
like Hitler. I mean, I get that I
guess that would overlap to a sense. I
mean, I I can include it because the
point is somebody might feel that that's enough
to take them out because, you know, that
that either way, the point is the same.
The only reason I kinda push that aside
is because I think they're all there. Biden,
Trump, Obama, Bush, these are fascist guys. They're
very clearly
driving us into a direction of an authoritarian
government, but specifically fascist in the sense because
they have,
step by step, driven us to the point
to where corporate and government entities are one
and the same. But all that aside, I
just think it's important to think about that.
Oh, and that yeah. The the normal video.
And then Steven Crowder put this out. Now
I this is something he's claiming that he
got from Utah County Sheriff's Office. So it's
worth considering that that may not be the
case,
especially with the way that the, you know,
lack of due diligence across the mainstream alternative
media. Regardless, I think it's worth pointing at
and and considering. Now this was something that
was put out in regard to the arrest.
Now you can read through all this. The
point most of this is stuff that's already
being reported. What I found really interesting
tell me if you find anything else on
this, and we're finishing out right now that
I'm not seeing. If you look closely,
you can see it's the Utah County Sheriff
in inmate details,
Tyler James Robinson.
What does it say right there?
Status
released.
See that?
I don't and and I was going back
and forth. Oral, we were talking about this.
You know? And there well, I'll show you
what Grok has to say about this because
it's an interesting point in regard to whether,
you know, that it was transferred to something.
But I don't see anybody even talking about
this. Most people are acting like this is
the kind of endpoint.
And I'll add this is what, Mondo ARG
said. First, George Zinn claimed credit. Now they
have a new patsy who just managed to
hide a rifle in the woods before he
jumped off the roof, but he took time
to break it down first then reassembled it
for the FBI photo shoot. This will not
this will be like the lost like Las
Vegas and Butler, he says. No public report
of crime scene reconstruction. No ballistics. No autopsy
no autopsy reports. No powder residue. Just believe
the official narrative. Those are all very valid
points that seem to kind of when they
want to,
that's not
relevant. And usually, when there are events that
we are you know, my point is that
you can like, it's it's the when it
suits their interest the most, it seems that's
when those things don't get used, which suggests
that there would prove something they don't want
you to see. But
do you think that he was released? And
I think that's very interesting to think about.
If he was and, honestly, right now, I'm
leaning towards probably not. But if he was,
that suggests that maybe he isn't even the
guy or something like that. But that's why
I'm not leaning that way because I find
that hard to
reconcile with everything else happening and the fact
that the charges are there, that he is
being charged for murder and so on. So
keeping that in mind just as a possible
data point, I thought that was interesting.
And here's what,
this is what Grock said. No. He is
still in Utah, where he's, you know, still
arrested right there. He was booked to Utah
County Jail where he remains as of the
twelfth. But this I I just did this
to see what Grock would say. Well, this
police document shows him he's listed as released.
So this is very now let's think of
it this way too. It's a good thought
experiment.
If it turns out that he's clearly not
released, which I think that's what the data
shows,
this is how easy it is to, you
know, guide
Grock or an AI thing like this. So
I showed him the image that we're talking
about,
and I said this or it. The police
document shows him listed as released. And here's
what Grock said.
Yes. Based on the Utah County Sheriff's Office
inmate details document you provided,
James
Tyler James Robinson appears to have been released
from custody. So right there, that's something Loomer
would jump to. Immediately talking about that or
many any number of other things that people
like that would immediately lurch into without even
carrying to check.
The booking occurred on September 12,
but the bail for his primary charge listed
as zero.
That seems strange as well.
A bail type of not bailable.
This typically indicates no bond was set. But
in practice, for such serious charges, it could
mean he was held without bail initially. However,
the document structure under the charges section show
release type fields as blank across all entries,
which may suggest processing
for release
or or an administrative notion rather than active
detention.
The document also includes redactions and watermarks
saying, and the overall layout aligns with the
post booking summary where he's released pending or,
pending or noted as eligible.
No explicit release temps time stamp is visible,
but the absence of an ongoing hold indicate
hold indicators and the zero bail for the
capital offense implies he was not retained long
term, potentially due to procedural review, transfer, or
a court decision shortly after booking. So my
point is that it is I would argue
either he is released, which we'll find out
soon enough, I would guess, or that this
was something where he's being transferred somewhere else
and that's why that was set, but that
hasn't come out yet. I mean, all of
this, if this is some kind of deeper
thing, is interesting.
Right? Because
if he was moved somewhere else, if there's
something shifts and we don't get to see
how this resolves, I'm gonna wonder what actually
happened. But we're it's very early for all
this. So just these are things to keep
in your mind as this can as this
develops. It says it aligns with reports of
his arrest on the eleventh, but contradicts broader
news coverage.
Right. So I I just it's what Grock
ended up putting out. So going back to
the point where we can prove is that
the documents show that he was arrested. That
release point could simply indicate that he was
moved somewhere else or something else happened. We
might find out. Now this was just to
there's a couple anomalies I wanted to go
over in regard to the person they caught.
Now this this I'm not gonna get into
what Roland Stone here said because it's not
it's open their opinion about people they're looking
into, in particular, the person that's listed in
this. But I just wanted to share this
with you
that these are scanner
reports on the in regard to the arrest.
Now remember, these things can be wrong. They
can say things based on what people have
seen but didn't turn out to be correct.
But I still found it relevant, and it's
just like I said, a data point that
you can archive if it becomes relevant. But
here's what these the, and shout out to
Ro Lynn Stone for sharing this. I appreciate
it. And these are two clip recordings from
the,
police scanner.
One of them talking about the what he
was wearing, which is all black, which then
contradicts
what they found him in and what he
was seen earlier in. But then also, the
name that they said was the suspect, which
again, doesn't have to prove that it was
him because they could be wrong and so
on. But in case it becomes relevant or
and I'll I'll comment the name afterward. Here
here's the two,
audios.
I have on the UVU called freemium agency
assist.
She's going to be wearing all black, black
long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask,
possibly wearing a tactical vest. Okay. Tactical helmet,
tactical vest, possibly.
Okay. Well,
I that's hard to reconcile with all black
shirt, hat. You know? That doesn't I mean,
I I think it's pretty so what that
suggests, unless they're wrong, is that there was
somebody who was dressed in tactical gear, which
I also kinda find hard to believe even
as somebody else. Why would you dress up
in obvious tactical gear? You know? So it's
confounding, but it's a data point that's out
there. Here's another one. This is the one
about the person.
Copy. Continuing. That sounds to locate active shooter
suspect.
I pulled up in a black mask, possibly
carrying a rifle.
Toyota Corolla
S820BravoLima.
And then they they listed the information about
the Corolla, which is I think what they
I think no. I think they said a
different car on the other one too. Suspect.
Hostile name Zachariah
Quershey. Date of birth 05/12/2000.
The mail is S820BravoLima.
Suspect hospital name Zachariah
Quershey. Date of birth 05/12/2000.
The mail is going from hospital to hospital
looking for the victim.
Again, use 100.
Notify if located in the day trial 15
o Going hospital, hospital, look for the victim.
Very weird. Very weird.
So,
obviously, there's there's numerous
you know, like, other than the point of
people being, you know, radical. I mean, like,
there there's a lot that we don't get
into that or, like, they can't be necessarily
proven in some in many cases. But things
like we've talked about, like, neuroscience, neuroweapons. It's
not something that should be dismissed. But just
the the larger point that people remember, things
like
MK Ultra or like, the idea of that
kind of influence,
I think that's something that we don't get
into enough. The idea that somebody could be
either,
primed that have been set up for a
long time or that you could just use
something to
cause someone to snap. I I think these
are I mean, you have to understand. Regardless
of whether you think that exists, you can
literally prove the government's been investigating how to
do that, its entire existence. And I'm not
I mean, I'm kinda being hyperbolic, but you
can go through and look at long term
you know, it throughout the decades, DARPA and
others, military, very clearly, which same point, but
different parts of it, going after how to
do exactly that.
Very it's, you know, worth considering because I
think that there's more to that and whether
or not like, that would be, like, how
you'd explain a random kid like this having
something like that happen. But it shouldn't be
dismissed either that it's possible that a kid
like that could just
break
with where we are today. That's why I
really do think that's a point that we
can't dismiss. The idea that what they're doing
to us this is something Caitlin Johnstone brings
up I've I've seen her bring up over
the years that we are so highly propagandized
and the The UK as well that that
it causes something, you know, people you know,
then you add antidepressants and pharmaceuticals and and
whatever else, and people just break. I feel
I feel like that's a very valid point
to make.
But some of the other points on this
that I thought were interesting.
Start you many of you probably seen these
circulating because they're they're things that have kind
of been grabbed and shared by some of
these larger accounts than instead, you know, it's
interesting. Has the FBI knocked on this man's
door yet? It says. Omar posted this twenty
four hours before Charlie Kirk was murdered. And
this is real, by the way. It's it's
even been my point on this is not
even to say that this is the guy,
but more so that it's regardless, it could
be, I guess. But this is what on
Twitter and everywhere else, instantaneously,
that was happening.
This what this shows me is cultivating information
on on the platform. Now the like, let
me just show you what it says first.
And this what's this say? His anime avatar
plus shooter was wearing the samurai jacket. I
I don't know why I have that there.
So here here is what he posted, and
here's the post, which, of course, as you
know, we do for you. I found it
and put and we'll include it.
Where is it? So here oh, that's right.
What that we so we found the
post
or rather the, a a so the the
account was
this without the one,
and Twitter has already removed it. And we
can prove this
because this is the person here for for
multiple reasons who came back on and said,
I'm not the shooter launching a token in
Charlie's legacy. All proceeds go to every town.
And then somebody else, before they could get
back their old account because they were deleted,
jumped in and said username taken after the
original owner changed their handle to prevent it
being taken and used by scammers.
Very interesting. It's just this weird so whatever's
happening here, this person said this.
Charlie Kirk is coming to my college tomorrow,
and I really hope someone evaporates him literally,
Which I'm willing to bet you can find
any number of examples like that from people
that did I'm willing to bet you that
you could find things of people saying that
about me if I went somewhere. It's just
it's when your your face is out there,
there's gonna be there's more likelihood that people
are gonna have irrational hate. And and this
is the case because of the way you're
framed by people on the other partisan, childish
side,
that you're somehow the secret racist, anti semite,
whatever it is. And it drives people to
dishonestly
or manipulatively
hate you. And irrationally so.
So, yes, that would be in the case
of the erratic the radical,
you know, the people that are like that
on the left and the right, but in
this case, it would be left.
Charlie Kirk is coming to my college tomorrow.
I really hope someone evaporates him literally. Now
what's important to point out, in the in
in the real sense,
that's protected under free speech.
Period.
But with because we're in the in the
world today where we allow alterations and manipulations,
even though it's repugnant to the constitution of
things like, say, fire in a theater and
everything else, this it's become the idea that,
okay. Well, now you're you're
threatening him or so on. Now I'm just
making that point first. We need to go
back to the the basics here, guys, and
understand that the whore the core principle is
that you're lit you're allowed to say what
you want. That's free speech. But But within
the world that we're in today, the idea
is that you can't threaten someone's life and
so on, which into some degree, I understand.
But, again,
it it's today, more than anything, I'm I'm
gonna be taking the harder stance on this.
That's why I went back to even the
fire in a theater point, is that it's
about the principle, and it has to be
because of how crazy it is today, that's
how, like, absolute we have to be about
it. Because that's what it is. Anyway, the
point is saying this online,
you could argue might get used, you know,
police,
authorities might reach out and so on. But
the idea that they would censor it, I
think, is important to think about on the
free speech platform. And it says, let's just
say something big will happen tomorrow.
That's what they said. Now, of course, couldn't
this be the person? Yes. Now why isn't
this being discussed? And why would Twitter delete
it all before we even got a chance
to see it? That's the real point I'm
getting at, kind of cultivating these things in
the conversation.
And and even more so, it looks to
be somebody that would fit their profile that
they want you to think about, a trans
person.
Now this says, looks look what somebody posted
yesterday, and they're just kind of highlighting this.
Same the same post.
Charlie Kirk is coming to my colleague, the
whole thing.
Then this is what happened.
Lock the account, change the handle to a
different one that can be easily that he
can easily be traced, they're saying. Then, of
course, they got then it got nuked.
Very interesting. Now the the point is you
can tell that it wasn't something that they
did on purpose because, clearly, this person was
able to jump in and grab it from
them.
I just think that's very relevant. And there's
a lot of examples like this, as well
as just a a data point of somebody
who before it happened was publicly saying that
this is what he wanted and that he
expects something big. I find that very relevant.
But with all the facts, it doesn't seem
to suggest that's the case, but it's important
to include for as it develops and more
comes out. So beyond the people and that
conversation, there is a ton of anomalies in
this that I wanted you to see. Now
this is just starting with the most current.
This is something that happened as of
03:00 today.
And this is, I guess, from central time.
Police rapidly evacuate
the neighborhood
where Charlie Kirk's assassin that we're being told
is arrested for, the data points to, lives
after receiving, quote, concerning information.
Now I guess you could argue that somebody
they somebody said they he had his house
set to explode or something like that, and
I guess that would make sense. But I
haven't seen any details on this unless somebody
knows about it in the chat. Let me
know. But this I'll play the clip for
you. All they're saying is they got some
concerning information and the neighborhood's being evacuated. Now,
again, you know, your your the whole spite
your your suspicion is aroused.
As we should. What why? What's happening there?
Is it like, hypothetically,
evacuate the whole area, and then you can
do whatever you want. But, again, I'm not
saying that's what I think, just one of
the possibilities. In this case,
it would make the most sense, Occam's razor,
that this is something that, like, I would
even argue that somebody, like,
swatted in a sense, you know, called it
in some threat. There there's something that's gonna
happen in the house, and they just be
safe, evacuate it at all, but included so
you can consider for yourself.
Preparing to go live and show you this
all on air, but moments ago,
police,
told us that we had to evacuate the
area, that they got some type of concerning
information,
basically directly,
in front of or around the family home.
We're not, certain what that concerning information is,
but there's also a chopper above, and authorities
told us that we had to clear the
area. So that's why I'm on the phone
right now. We're not able to show you
this on camera. But, the neighborhood where the
family lived in is a nice, you know,
middle class to to upper class neighborhood.
Interesting.
So I'd like to find out. I mean
and if we'd ever hear anything about it
again, I find that even more strange. But
if we I'd like to find out what
it was. What was the threat? Who made
the call? Where did it come from? I
find that actually more relevant than you might
think.
But leave it there till we get more
information.
The book you probably have seen for the
claims going around the beginning of it, you
know, there's as always, and it's amazing this
Partisans jump in with bullshit or excuse me.
I'm not so just cussing. Fake information and
excuse me for the curse.
Like, literally coming in, like, like, with the
lion thing, you know, sharing old videos of
of lens flares and just, you know, just
gets flooded. And those of us that do
this, you know, consistent for over the years,
we've seen those before. And and and every
time like, the next time you get a
conversation where it somehow ties back to direct
energy weapons, you're gonna see those same old
videos likely shared yet again by Stu Peters
that you
bring information that isn't correct or, you know,
every time.
But this is this was just under this.
Just go offline there for a second.
I might have. But it looks like we're
live still, so I'll keep going. Let me
know in the chat if I was
disconnecting.
Interesting.
Well, at this point,
September 9,
the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Now I find
this interesting, but I've I've got it I've
got, like, a
one, I feel like
if this was
organic
or I guess that's not a way to
frame it. But, like, if so if this
is the case, that it's September 9 and
it wasn't altered, you know, like, I feel
like the sense is this could be changed.
Like, on a website, this could be changed.
I don't know if it's the case with
Amazon, but my point would be that if
it was if it, you know, different actually
came out on the ninth, I feel like
that's intentionally meant to
cause people to react. I mean, why because
the question would be if that was the
case, you know that's gonna be noticed. People
are going to recognize, and that very clearly
suggests that you had foreknowledge. So I find
that almost impossible to believe. But, you know
what I mean? You can make of it
what you will. What's very weird to me
is that it's it's it's this is happening
often now.
Now let's just even say the others that
aren't the day before, let's say. There's times
where you have something happens and within, like,
less than twenty four hours, a book is
posted. Now, I think today, there's many reasons
if you wanted to consider what how that
could happen with AI, for example, or that
there is,
you know, somebody who just puts something together
as quick as possible to get the first
thing out, you know, or things like that.
But the idea that you have these things
come out,
so, you know, it's it's yeah. Yeah. It's
just someone saying in the chat, for example.
Like, you could. You could put something together
and get it done pretty quickly. So that's,
I think, what happens in some cases because
people recognize an opportunity. But how do you
explain
on the ninth? You know, there there's these
weird overlaps to this. There's a lot of
these around this story.
Now here's an example you probably seen circulating
of what you know, people are calling it
tampering with the evidence, which affect technically, is
what this is. But I think you could
all rationalize why somebody who I mean, I
I mean, I it's kinda hard to with
what happened, I think most people, especially today,
would recognize that you're not supposed to move
things around. Who who knows when somebody might
be upset about what happened or just think
they wanna get their things out of the
way. I'm just trying to point out the
obvious, the possible objective points. But I find
this very important, the idea that right after
this, there you know, things are being moved
around, cameras are being taken down.
The thousand, that seems odd to me. Or
at the very least, it shouldn't be happening
with a crime scene.
Safety team is here. Takes the chair that
he was sitting in, moves it to grab
where Charlie Ferguson the camera that's above him.
Charlie Ferguson here. I find that crazy, to
be honest. I mean, that's just said. How
would you not know that?
And if if that camera was taken and
not covered by the police, I think that's
quite relevant. Push one, sir.
We see these things so often these days.
You know? Like, these weird these things that
are just so completely incongruent with what we're
always told is the absolute. You know, sort
of like the lie we're still told that
the police the secret service at Butler were
waiting to be fired on before they could
fire, despite you quite literally being able to
prove that that's against their operating procedure.
And in the next event they had, they
were opening fire before. You know, it's just
it's and nobody wants to ask these questions
that are tapped into the partisan game,
at least on some sides and some circumstances,
but it seems more often these days than
not.
This I found really relevant. Remember, these are
all just anomalies. Like, we'll get to the
more
you know, we'll get into some segments here.
This is more about the anomalies one by
one that I think are worth pointing out.
So, again, actually, I should've put this in
line with the first part, Twitter.
Denzian,
diligent Denzian pointing out in, this is,
what's his name again? Matt Taibbi,
pointing out and all day pretty much posting
things from it if because he's got it
behind a paywall, which is frustrating.
A Twitter files report on Charlie Kirk
and about how it seems in 2020, currently
under the Trump administration, they were discussing removing
him from Twitter, which apparently happened. Now I
don't know whether that's just they they think
that looks uncomfortable. They don't wanna be seen
for
talking about removing the guy, that they wanna
act like there's the champion of their entire
world right now, Trump and all the rest,
all shamelessly using this person, which just makes
me it's just disgusting how like, I'm not
saying they maybe they love the guy, but
the way it's being done is wildly over
the top. Like, it just it's obvious they're
be they're using it for their political momentum,
and it grosses me out. Both left and
right do it every day. But Twitter took
this down.
Matt Taibbi.
Not sure what happened and here's the tweet
right here. Oh, wait. Was it right here?
Here it is.
Not sure what happened, but a but a
25
post thread on Charlie Kirk and and Twitter
just vanished.
He posted this today.
I mean, guys, this is a one point
free speech platform. Right?
There's some cultivation going on here. There's some
whatever was in this report that they clearly
I mean, explain for me why that's not
related.
You know what I mean? There's something happening
that I and it doesn't have to mean
exactly what you know, whatever. It could mean
any number of things, but it means something.
And I find that really interesting, even again
to the core point of the or the
first point of just
lying about what's happening on this platform. Matt
Taibbi knows well in regard to who was
working with this in the first place and
then getting pushed out because he dared to
not blindly only work with Twitter.
But there's more to it. He's been going
on posting throughout the day. This is one
of them right here.
Or this one just the first where it
goes through and just simply show well, I'll
just quickly tell you that it basically just
says that they're working with the US government
team from for the within Twitter and discussing
whether or not this would happen. And it's
in this in 2020. This is in before
the changeover.
And this yeah. He he highlights this one.
US government team was in the Twitter tags
and it's or in their their email chain.
Thanks again for everyone's work on this.
And they're talking about the same point. You
can you're talking about, you know, background on
Turning Point and also, you know, this this
is clear. And it says, all email chains
involving possible removal of Charlie Kirk during the
election year twenty '20 were copied to the
most senior executives as well as its liaison
US government team.
This person says, Grock, is Matt referring to
Kirk being suggested to be removed from Twitter
by censors and the government? This person says,
yeah. They silenced most of us. This is
a a conservative speaking up. Charlie was just
too big for it to work. My main
my main is still suspended.
See this game we play about, you know,
the Republicans are winning and we're fighting the
bad game. Well, there's plenty of them that
aren't part of the team sport game that
are
still being suppressed. But it goes, I've been
ghost banned for most of the last six
years. It didn't improve under Elon Musk. On
the contrary, it's far worse today.
Plenty of them out there if you just
look beyond the mainstream media screaming circus,
mainstream alternative media and mainstream media. But another
anomaly which we were pointing out earlier, as
Maj points out, shot Charlie with this rifle
and optic,
disassembled this rifle, we're told, slid it down
his leg. This this is the general narrative,
jumped off the roof,
reassembled it, and left it.
Because that makes sense. Right?
Then it goes again, made the shot, disassembled
it, slid it in his pants, jumped,
ever jumped with a broomstick in your pants,
then reassembled it for for no reason, apparently.
So leaving breadcrumbs with the ammo messages, then
tells his dad about it all. Oh, and
he did a wardrobe wardrobe a wardrobe
wardrobe change. I don't know why that was
hard for me to say.
I mean, yeah. It possible? Yeah. Sure. But
certainly doesn't make sense. But, again, as always,
we talk about these points. We say, maybe
tomorrow some new data point comes out that
goes, oh, okay. That's why it all now
adds up. My point is don't
assume.
Now Help Ranger says, in the process of
faking evidence, the FBI is too stupid to
even mount the rifle scope in the correct
position in their process of fabricating fake evidence.
Now, again, you know,
this is often why I don't share this
account. I'm really sharing this one, but the
point is, you know,
the I'll often give my opinion. But, you
know, the idea that it's absolute.
We don't know for a fact that's happening.
I largely agree there probably something in this
realm. But, you know, it's just I just
we gotta stop being so subjective and assumptive,
especially when it comes to partisan politics.
But the point is that this is you
know, he's suggesting that he believed the FBI
was the one that did this, and that's
why it's backward. The rifle is unshootable in
a prone position for a simple reason that's
obvious to anyone who's ever shot a rifle
in a prone position. The FBI thinks you're
stupid. The rifle is planted. 100% theater. You
know? I agree that there's something very suspicious
here. And that is and the all of
it points to that somebody put it there,
made you think this, but that we know
it's them, and then that's I just we
can't it's important to me, guys. You know
it is.
Oh, and then he just adds that the
almost certainly written by the FBI again. But
he says, this is Nicholas Irving saying, if
this was the rifle used to assassinate Kirk,
I have some questions, and we may need
to start looking for someone with a black
eye.
The point is,
there are multiple things about it, including the
scope. The the there's
clear
pardon me.
There's multiple examples that or evidence points around
this that show that this was either deliberately
put together like this to make you point
it out or that somebody just was clumsy,
which by the way, the reason I'm saying
it like that is it happens every time.
We just went through this where they were
using it and show it wasn't even correct.
How do they not pick this up? To
me, it seems like there's something in this
that's like I got the
at least question whether something about this is
that we're supposed to be seeing it. Either
way, I agree that's insane. And the idea
is clearly standing out
either incompetency
or that you I guess, you know, like,
they want you to see this, but it
stands out. How does this make sense?
Now if, again, if you're gonna piece it
in,
if you're trying to create a patsy,
especially when you look at the clumsy Israeli
propaganda that we're seeing today, it kinda makes
sense that they would just patch together some
quick narrative and dump a gun backwards somehow.
And, you know, and and with the description
of somebody else, you know, it seems like
the the so far, it's leaning in the
direction that there was somebody else that that
backs that up.
Now Morgan puts this out. The universities of
Utah the University of Utah, and I do
found this. This is actually pretty interesting, is
effectively ringed by a military security complex.
She says, I know there are limitations and
that there was a significant land transfer agreement,
but nonetheless.
It says on campus, you've got Fort Douglas.
Just west is Roland R Wright,
another military base. Thirty minutes north sits another
air force base. South is Camp Williams, and
further west is Dugway Proving Ground, we've talked
about with regard to biological stuff, and
Toole Army Depot. And then and and in
dozens of guard armories,
VA centers, DHS contractors, and private security outfits,
and the area is saturated with infrastructure.
And yet, they couldn't obtain security detail. And
in a
terror attack on a campus with 40,000 kids,
they're not responding, which was that's what was
happening. And on September 11, no less,
if there were really a shooter, you'd expect
the full weight of the US military to
make make sure they were vaporized within minutes.
I mean, that's a fair point to make.
Again, always something that could you know, maybe
there's a reason. But if you look at
the way that the especially the Trump administration
operates,
I mean, on much on much less information,
Bull rush into it with all the force
you have, but not now.
And over and, you know, over like, juxtaposing
that with all the responses from Trump and
Netanyahu and pretty much every major, it's very
weird.
As Kit Claringberg points out, the insane attention
that Kirk shooting is generating in The UK
and plenty of other places is making my
antenna twitch. The BBC
has given his death blanket coverage, and Starmer
and Yvette Cooper have both issued personal condolences.
How many Britons know who this guy was?
I'd imagine a lot of them, but the
point is the same.
I mean, why does that make sense to
anybody? I've seen there's been I mean, I've
seen heads of state die that don't get
this kind of attention.
It feels weird.
But you
vice president Vance carried his coffin on air
force two. They're giving him some kind of
a military burial. You know, look. Guys, regardless,
it's just like any other person we've talked
about. There's gonna be those that wanna grab,
clutch their pearls, and call you a bad
person for saying the reality.
But the obvious point is to make, like
we talked about with other people in like,
let's take presidents for example. They always get
lionized as the greatest person in the world
when they're all war criminals.
Now I've got plenty of negative things I
could say about Charlie Kirk. The point is
just simply that there are clear examples, I
would argue, of partisan manipulation that I can
prove to you. So that's that I've made
this opinion about all. I've pointed this out
about them all. That doesn't mean you should
be
disgusting or not consider their family. And, you
know, these things are always there, like I
said the first time. Decorum, I do think
is important. But
if you know this person is, you know,
what's the right word? Contentious
for plenty it doesn't make much sense to
have this kind of coverage,
especially from plenty of other platforms that would
have called him some alt right maniac who
are now praying for him. It it seems
strange.
Oh, oh, the point was about the you
know, so you're giving this person a you
know, it's like saying, here's a medal of
honor. Like, it just doesn't really make sense
with the reality of what was happening. But
you'll be called a bad person for you
know, it's always how that works.
So Matt Kim says, so we're supposed to
believe that a high IQ college student spends
days scouting a location, carries out a public
execution with a rifle from a distance,
successfully gets away. But instead of disappearing, he
goes home so his minister and father can
turn him in, which again, he was part
of that, and then conveniently leaves all the
evidence sitting in a Discord chat, which actually
didn't happen. But same point, though. It does
feel very, very inconsistent to me. But turns
out,
another inconsistency always seems this is how when
a story is patched together,
this is what tends to happen. Day days
go on, one by one, parts of it
fall away, which we keep seeing. Not to
say that's what's happening just yet, but it's
starting to feel that way. Discord says platform
not used in suspect's murder plan, TMZ.
This statement goes on. The message is referenced
in recent reporting. I'll just read first part
since that's all of it. It says, in
the course of our investigation from Discord, we
identified a Discord account associated with the suspect,
but have found no evidence that the suspect
plants planned this incident or promoted on this
court. Now you could point out that they
definitely have an interest in that you know,
lying about that, I would guess, if that's
something that they were capable of doing, which,
of course, they are. But it does seem
like that all the rest of the evidence
is pointing to the fact that it was
either a misunderstanding
or deliberately used. The statement goes on. The
messages
referenced in recent reporting about planning details do
not appear to be on Discord messages, both
because they don't appear to be there as
well as what they do find in the
evidence. You can it's like it's I think
people look at it and assume,
like, you would you know, this is a
message on one platform, but when those that
use them, you can look and be like,
oh, that's actually not Twitter. You can tell
by these icons, something like that. Because it
appear appears to have not actually been in
the Discord
client. It was in something else.
And I'll you'll see what I mean when
I read it. It says these were communications
between suspect's roommate and a friend after the
shooting, where the roommate was recounting
the contents of a note that suspect had
left elsewhere. Authorities say Robinson's roommate showed them
Robinson
had made a joke on Discord and then
showed investigators the messages, which included Tyler stating
a need to retrieve a rifle from a
drop point,
leaving the rifle in a bush.
So
can understand somebody leaving something that you wanna
yeah. But putting it back together?
I just that seems unlikely to me. And
so if you factor in this point,
the relay of the information,
If that was all you had, I that's
very suspicious. But when you include the fact
that he as we're told at the very
least that he went home, talked to his
father, was convinced to turn himself in, they
went through that. That seems anomalous to me
with this. So that my point is that's
why I included that in the beginning.
If that is the reality, which so far
seems to be, that that is it doesn't
add up to me with the idea that
he's being railroaded, let's say. Right? Unless he's
being somehow manipulated.
But the idea is that he you know,
the information came from his friend talking about
that that's what he did. You know? So
you could argue that that ultimately isn't really
what happened. This is interesting.
But the point is that they're reporting to
you something that didn't actually happen.
So where did that come from? It could
be a mistake. Well, check this out. It
says,
propaganda code is very weird. The governor claims
the FBI took images of communications between Robinson
and his roommate about the guns, its locations,
watching it and charging clothes changing clothes.
But Discord says these messages didn't take place
on Discord.
We identified a Discord account associated with the
suspect. We have found no evidence that the
suspect planned the incident or promoted the violence
on Discord. The messages referenced a recent reporting
about planning details
do not appear to be on Discord messages.
These were communications between suspects, roommate, and we
we read this for you. But so the
FBI claiming it's on Discord, you could argue
is a you know, that they just don't
understand what they're looking at, which is embarrassing,
I guess,
or more.
I mean, that that's what's worth considering, that
this might be somehow being patched together. But,
I mean, again, Occam's razor, it would make
most sense that this was something that they
just didn't that it was on, you know,
a Discord message but wasn't on the platform
or was on something they were looking at,
that, like, a screen window that was back
you know? I don't know. Any number of
possibilities. The way that they wrote that seemed
to suggest that it was him writing it,
not Tyler. And so it was on you
know, it was but see, that's what's confounding
me is that the way they list it
off is they say it wasn't even found
on Discord.
I I don't know. It's just confusing. Right?
But this is what we point out in
the past, these inconsistencies.
And if you lie about things in a
grand scale and you really look, this is
what tends to happen.
Adam Cochran points out, got hand to TMZ,
doing some actual journalism these days, including with
the footage yesterday. It says they confirmed with
Discord that the messages right wing accounts claimed
were Tyler planning to planning the killing on
Discord were with, that they were claiming. And
this is what the narrative was, planning the
killing with left wing groups on Discord. You
see how quickly these things spin out because
people like Loomer get one piece and just
scream about the narrative. You know? And this
well, here's what they do all the time.
They get a piece like this. They kinda
just fill in the blanks with what they
think might be the case. And sometimes that
kind of in some way gets close to
that, and they just argue it's either been
altered because left or whatever, or they just
get wrong and they go forward. Jones does
it all the time. So my point would
be that this is something you could argue
they expected might be the case, and it's
easy to lay that narrative out. It's already
become they planned on discord with left wing
groups to kill all the
not true. Most of those points have turned
out to not be true, including the Republican
family and, you know, it's just clearly,
you already know. If you're honest, you know
that they're forcing this in as a political
move, not because they care about the truth,
which is pretty disgusting for people claiming to
care about Charlie Kirk. It says the messages
referenced in recent reporting are not from Discord
nor Tyler's account.
Yet another falsified claim of him being leftist,
just like the DSA shirt wasn't real, just
like him speaking at a DSA rally wasn't
him. Now I find that incredibly interesting. You
know why? Because
this was going around as well.
Trump shirt.
But it appears to be altered like everything
else going on today. So both sides are
playing this game. It just kills me. And
I think, actually, it's probably not even really
both sides, but whoever's actually conducting this, if
it is an operation. Hey, MAGA. Tyler Robinson,
a Republican, killed Charlie Kirk. It says, will
MAGA take responsibility?
But here's Twitter, and it's not just Twitter.
You can look for yourself. It does appear
to be. It says this image has been
digitally altered. There's another image where they're wearing
just a plain shirt, and they put that
on there apparently. So what's interesting to me
is so you have
the right.
If this and and why would the right
do this if it's so obvious? Faking him
with a shirt that claims he's a a
Democrat,
and then you've got the left faking him
as being a Trump supporter.
You know, it very clearly feels like we're
gonna get into a second, like we're being
driven towards some kind of civil war or
just some kind of chaos or division. And
that could just as easily be your government.
But the bottom line is that there's clearly
something
like, moving for a moment beyond the story
itself,
whatever you think happened, using whatever it is
to drive in some pretty
alarming things in this country.
We're just about to get to that. Here's
Matt Walsh.
Ron
Flipkowsky
says, so after days of Republicans blaming and
vilifying Democrats and trans people for Kirk's murder
despite having no clue what the person was.
Now right there, even if it turned out
to be those things, they're still irresponsible and
dishonest for claiming those things before we knew.
Anybody
with integrity would point that out.
And it says, we find out
it's a white guy from a Republican family
in Utah who loves guns. All of that
is true. Doesn't prove he's a Republican though.
Right? He could be a Democrat with a
Republican family. But I get part Ron's point
clearly that if they don't know yet and
they're lying about it, and on top of
that, some of the most provable data points
suggest the opposite.
This one simply says he's wearing it, and
this is the point we're making. Democrat socialist
party T shirt or they made that up.
Right? I mean, it's constant this happens.
Oh, wait. Sorry. I went past the
this one going back. Hope it goes back
for me.
Matt Walsh says says this. Yes. He was
from a nice Republican family, and yet
still radicalized into left wing extremism. Come on,
guys. Like, you're embarrassing yourselves. Like, you know,
they're like, for example, during the trans invest,
cop topic, I thought Matt Walsh did some
amazing work.
But that you can just, like, on top
of this, force in that you somehow magically
know that,
that's just blind
assumption, self serving assumption being framed as, you
know, duh, we all know. You know, it's
just it's insulting.
Could it be? Obviously.
But then he's going so on top of
the fact that you have that he's from
a Republican family.
You just go, but he was radicalized because
what else?
How that's guys, take a note of that.
Recognize that people that means that we whether
he means to do it or not, which
I kinda think it's obvious they mean to
do it. The point is that there that
shows an example of points at which he
will be manipulated by his own partisans' leanings
against the truth. That's that's what I think
partisanship does at its core.
Oh, and this is asking Grock. Let's see
what it says. For those that, you know,
somehow think that this is always right or
that that it'll be somehow right leaning. But
it simply says,
in regard to him being a concern or
liberal, it says that he's accused, which is
the key indicators
of whether he was,
appears to hold liberal left leaning political views
based on this evidence.
So clearly, you can see that that's so
what's funny to me is,
well, I I mean, if there's other responses
you could find, but on Grok, I find
it interesting that what we're talking about is
he has left leaning views because that's what
they're scraping. But the weird thing is you
could find just as many points that are
saying, like, not just the views, but the
evidence of the more likely, like, the Republican
family and different points.
But the point is we don't know, and
that's what they'll tell you. But here's the
evidence they're using to claim they know he's
liberal, that he engraved anti fascist messages on
his ammunition.
See?
Just because
you're saying someone's a fascist, one, does not
mean you're well, doesn't mean
look. Antifa is not anti fascist, you clowns.
It is the most fascist thing in the
conversation.
It's literally the fascist group calling themselves anti
fascism, but it's because that's what they're it's
it's so
elementary.
But so you write fascist or you call
Trump a fascist, therefore, you're suddenly a liberal?
That's just lazy thinking. Could be. Sure.
Family members reported that he had become more
political in recent years. Dislike for Kirk. Guys,
these things don't mean anything in the context.
It's a data point that could suggest that.
I know plenty of conservatives that don't like
Kirk at all. It says his family discussed
Kirk's upcoming event. They did not like him.
No. That that might be evidence in regard
to that he might be responsible,
but claiming that any of those things mean
that he's a liberal is just lazy or
dishonest
or self serving or all three of those
things, which is usually what I think.
Now
despite that, and even to this point that
we have somebody in custody
who
is not verifiable in anything at this point,
there's data points to I mean, dig in
to be clear. You have data points of
things that I would argue they're pointing to
that don't prove
anything, like wearing a mask or being against
Trump or whatever. You have people on all
sides,
every side, that could think that,
but they still could could be. But on
the other side, you have data points like
the Republican family or the like, even even
loving guns, for example, which also don't prove,
but are in fact actual points of which
you would argue associate with a side, not
a mask, for example. Right? I I think
that's worth pointing. But I guess you could
argue that there are Democrats that love guns
or that you know? But the Republican family,
I think, is the core point in that,
but don't approve anything. I'm just simply highlighting
that I think that if you had to
pick a scale, it's slightly tilted towards Republican,
but neither are proven.
I think that makes sense if you get
what I'm saying because the rest are just
subjective, like, that's what we know liberals do
even though it goes both ways. So on
that, without the evidence, the reality that they
don't know and we know for sure that
they're pushing in their political narrative, this is
the level to which it's gone.
And this is what a lot of us
are really I mean, this seems to be,
honestly, aside from the horrific nature of what
happened, which again, now that other than the
who is guilty of it, the story is,
you know, beyond us at this point. Like,
the idea that this will be kept in
our conversation for so long other than just
to say it's sad that it happened, that's
political manipulation.
But
this is oh, I guess what I was
saying is those of us that are recognizing
that this where it's going and how often
this happened, this is alarming. I get well,
that's what I was saying is that this
is the, like, the most important part of
this.
They're creating something here, clearly, aggressively driving this
in. And this is at the expense of
everything Americans think they want.
True stream media. These so called influencers are
trying to influence us into a war with
each other.
See this for what it is. Just a
thought. Says there is absolutely nothing organic about
the response to Charlie Kirk's death. Almost immediately,
we are seeing swarms
of influencers and leaders coming out in the
same message. This is war. Again, with no
evidence other than somebody did this.
And even if it was somebody who was
left, even let's even say it was somebody
that led some kind of political group, the
laziness would that to just go all liberals
because the ideologies grow. Yes. Guess what? I
agree, but it's the same ideology you share
and can't even resee in yourself.
The real point of it. Not the wedge
issues, but the fact that you're all in
different ways calling for suppression, calling for censorship,
calling for surveillance state.
But it says, the account after account calling
for people to be fired, censored, or worse.
Right. So the bro flakes. Right? You are
the same thing if you're calling for people
to be censored for making a bad, disgusting,
irresponsible,
insensitive joke about Charlie Kirk. That's what's happening.
It's the same thing we said last time
when lives with TikTok got that woman fired
for making a joke about Trump's being the
the whatever you think happened to Butler.
And all she said was too bad he
wasn't a better shot. Yes. That's insensitive.
Yes. I'm sure you're you know, the snowflake
that you are was so out raging. But,
yes, you could argue it's insensitive, but it
is not illegal. I don't care what you
pretend. And that they they marshal together. They
got that person found out. They doxed her.
They got her fired from Home Depot.
Probably ruined her life because she made a
joke. Think about how how childish that is,
and that is the left
in the right or the right in the
lead. It is the same thing.
And now I'll show you some examples of
that happening today.
This is not the solution, she writes, and
I agree. Don't let yourself be manipulated into
supporting the erosion of rights, which is what
everything you're looking at today is leading to,
or the hateful division that has become a
defining characteristic of the country.
There and and that's something the whole world
is noticing, guys. It says there is no
right versus left. There is only the people
versus the ruling class. Let that
resonate with you. There is only class war
if there is any to be had or
if there is to be any. Despite what
is being shoved down your throat twenty four
seven, especially on this platform, on Twitter, Your
your neighbor is not your enemy. They are
human. They have struggles. They are pro propagandized,
and they cannot change your material condition.
As Americans, we still have a choice to
unite or to further divide.
We still have a chance. Be a unifier.
Well said.
If you haven't seen this, it it should
it is alarming, guys. Look at the TikTok.
This is war.
Joey, Marrano, the Democrat party, it must be
classified as a terror domestic domestic terror organization.
And you realize this might be laughable if
it wasn't
borderline the same thing coming out of Trump's
mouth.
We're talking about the idea, and do you
not see how this fits into everything happening
all of a sudden if they choose if
you're just have the wrong political ideology
that you could be declared a terrorist?
I mean, guys, we've been warning about this
for how long? Whitney and myself and Derek
and anybody else calling this stuff out for
the longest time. We've been building towards this
point. Whitney wrote the article about who's a
terrorist in Biden's America.
It's the same points apply right now, and
you're just allowing it to rush in because
you somehow think it's only gonna go against
Democrats.
And really my mind of Gunther Eagleman and
the rest of these guys, the like, the
million plus influencers, they don't care. They don't
even genuinely care about the things. I I
think some of them probably do, and that
they're the dumbest ones in the room if
they actually think they're fighting for free speech
or freedom. But that's my point. I think
a lot of them are just
rolling in it right now. The money that
comes in for this platform, the influence they
share. You know, even if they don't make
direct money from it, the amount of influence
they gain from being in these circles and
the million they, you know, they make money
off this that you can't even imagine.
Charlie Kirk getting shot in in is the
shot heard around the country. I'm ready for
civil war. Brian Eastwood writes.
Sean Davis. When Democrats lose elections, they couldn't
steal. They're murder they murder the people they
weren't able to defeat.
Crazy to me.
Now look, just to begin to be clear,
we're making a point about this in this
segment. You can find just as many disgusting
things coming from the left,
all of which is free speech. They're say
whatever they want. But this is about the
idea that they're using something they can't even
verify to drive people into an irrational state.
And then and look, think about this, guys.
You're talking about political violence, and what you're
doing is going to drive people to political
violence. And you're acting like they're the you
are creating that right now. Probably by design.
But you can go through this. It's everywhere.
Laura Loomer, Elon Musk. If they won't leave
us in peace, then our choice is fight
or die.
God, that's alarming.
I'll I'll read this one from her in
a second.
Will Stachel says, now that Kirk's killer seems
to be caught, maybe the news could spare
a moment's attention for the right wing from
the commentariat
up to the president
whose immediate reaction was not mourning,
but to seize the opportunity to try to
incite violence against groups they hate.
Joe Mariano says that if the if if
the person who killed Charlie Kirk was transgender,
there can be no mercy for that species
any longer. We've already tolerated far too much
from these creatures.
You know my coverage about this topic.
But the idea that you're turning him into
some dehumanized other when in most cases, there
are people who have been manipulated by the
government? Like, do we not realize how obvious
these people will be the ones that are
talking about how they they, you know, left
have manipulate like, what about all the children
that got forced into it? You think they're
they're creatures?
Right? What about the people that are calling
it out? There are they a different species?
Like, you guys are just vile people. You've
created this idea and you turn people into
the other because it benefits you.
I'll I I've called out plenty of the
trans activism people that are out there that
are pushing. They're driving
to get children manipulated with them. We can
call them out. But you see, it's an
objective specific point. We call out the people
that are doing the wrong thing, not just
a subjective overlapping group because they share a
certain
personality trait or whatever it is. Like, that's
what I'm trying to highlight. This broad stroke
is always stupid. It's always irresponsible. It's always
dishonest.
The right and left do it every day.
He says he says these people wanted more
violence. They saw Kirk's death as an opportunity
to achieve it. It was a thrilling moment
for them when they could openly call for
violence.
Now you can that's their his opinion, clearly.
But it's kinda hard to miss that that
seems to be a driving force through a
lot of this. Now what you'll notice is
that you get the left groups peep
you know, in the in the problem reaction
solution of it all, that go out and,
you know, George Floyd and we're riot and
destroy and burn and whatever else. In some
cases, others not. That's objective.
And then you could put they'll point to
this and say, look at how we're praying
and we're not the same.
Okay. The only difference is what this is
is exactly the same. But if you wanna
make the case about the real picture, left
and right being the same under the real
the the one government, it's that you have
one side, like Reese just pointed out, creating
the violence and chaos or bringing
in the immigration and causing destabilization,
and then the right responds and brings in
the solution.
So if they can't see that their
pawn's being used in their technocratic game,
I mean, I guess that ends up being
our all of our responsibility. Right?
Lumer. They said they trained Sniper. She said
this on the tenth.
Yeah. Before we had any information, we hadn't
even caught anybody yet. They said they trained
Sniper to assassinate Kirk while he was sitting
next to a table full of Trump hats
because that that's that's what matters. Right? They
wanted to kill him for the hats he
was next to. But it says, you could
be next.
Based on what?
I hate to say it, she says, but
I have a sick feeling we'll be seeing
more targeted assassination. Oh, yeah. But you hate
to say it? Clearly not. The left are
terrorists.
I mean, it's just deranged what they're doing.
And if you wanna make the like, let's
just even say everything they're saying is true.
All you're showing is what I point out
all the time, that you are exactly the
same.
The kind of vile hatred and division
I mean, literally everything they talk about, Loomer
does on a daily basis. That is her
shtick. She comes out and she doxes people.
She calls peep she creates very clear hatred
and division and destabilization.
Drive people. She's she's six people on others
all the time. Go to their house. Find
them out. And this is what drives these
things. You are an example of one of
these either very stupid people that don't know
they're driving this or a useful idiot being
used by the power structures to drive it
in, and you know about it, which makes
it even worse.
Matt Walsh says the entire right has to
band together.
Enough of this infighting.
We are up against demonic forces and the
pit of hell. They're killing us in our
churches.
I mean, you this is just so irresponsible.
You're talking, like, as if this is a
the way they're framing it because they tell
you it's war is as a force. This
is a a force,
all of it coming at us at once,
and we're all under attack. That's I mean,
guys, if the idea if you yes, actually.
But the the power structure that he is
helping by saying things like this.
It says, they tried to kill our president.
Oh, they did? They killed Charlie. Like, you
know, maybe it makes sense if he's talking
about the foreign government that seems to be
tied to all of it, but he's not.
They killed Charlie, one of our greatest advocates.
Put the personal squabbles aside. Now is not
the time. This is existential, a fight for
our existence and the existence of our country.
See? How is that different than saying the
the the right is the end of everything.
They're fascist. That's you're doing the exact thing
that you're all right now calling out as
why this happened.
Anybody who's honest can point that out.
He's they're they're and what's interesting, by the
way, we'll get into the Ben Shapiro overlap
with the Daily Wire, who clearly, at the
end of the day, I think pulls the
strings.
The timing of this for him to to
switch into something that seems
very, like, shockingly lacking objectives objectivity.
I think Ben Shapiro and that whole entity
is behind largely that. You'll see why. Here's
Ben Benny Johnson. No one seems willing to
say it, so I will. You you mean
literally other than everybody in your conversation. Right?
I'm the lone person saying what all of
us have been driven to say. Like, it's
just it's just that's my point. You think
he doesn't see the conversation?
So why in the world would he come
out
on the twelfth
and pretend like he's the one brave enough
to say what literally everyone in the right
is saying? Because they're propagandists, guys. And it's
about how he's playing the people who might
be honest in his group. The modern democrat
party is not sorry when political violence happens.
They want it to happen. They create it
for condit for the conditions for it. Well,
yeah, so does the right and the left.
But the idea that you're getting broad stroke
anything, the idea is like, do you so
are you saying that every single political politician
was planning all of this or just that
they don't care about it? The point is
simply that they're not sorry when it carries
out. So are you gonna pretend that you
think that your people are pining over the
fact that their enemies are hurt too?
I mean, it's just it's obviously the same
thing on both sides of the coin. It's
the whole point in this segment.
But what they're doing is trying to make
it about one team. And that their their
politicians who are actively cheering on when other
bad things happen to other people are the
ones that are better than that.
It's just it's flatly incorrect.
And he must know that or he's too
stupid to see it.
Political violence happens.
They want it to happen. Here's the playbook.
Corporate media demonizes you.
Right. Left and right. Calls you Hitler. Fascist.
Deplorable. Right. Okay. Or
pedophile.
Or,
you know, what I mean, there's plenty of
terms. Or, you know, they're destroying the country.
They're going to bring the country down. They're
going to cause climate change to kill you.
You know, it's it's the point is not
individual word buzzwords, but the I the the
either individual words or statements that drive the
idea that you are
beyond
working with, that you are going to destroy
the country. If we don't do it today,
we're all gonna die tomorrow. That's the point
that they do. And so you know you
see that everywhere.
Yes. The left and the right do that
to the other side all day long.
Very much so. And the point is, when
you wanna get into the reality of it,
yes. Fascism.
Authoritarianism.
Biden, Trump, Obama, Bush. Yes.
Very easy. By definition, you can prove that.
But he wants you to think it's only
one side. Number two, left wing dark money
groups fund, arm, and radicalize people to target
you. Yep. Pretty much everywhere you look. Like,
are you really thinking that he's can't figure
that out? Like, you have to understand, this
person is not stupid enough to not be
able to recognize
how provably you can find right wing groups
that do the exact same thing. There's been
stories about it pretty consistently lately. So what
that shows you is, Betty Johnson, is he
is willfully
putting together an incorrect framing to manipulate you.
I can my I mean, my opinion, but
I can promise you he knows what he's
doing.
Here's the playbook.
Number four or number three, they hype violence,
glorify killers, and manipulate minds with drugs and
social media.
Really? Are we really gonna pretend like that's
not a ubiquitous reality that both systems, both
sides of the same government actively use and
participate in when they need to, like, right
now or anywhere else?
It just it's a kind of embarrassing. Right?
I mean, I'm hoping that it's not just
me feeling like people are changing, but that
people are looking at this and going, come
on. You know, this is this is cartoon
stuff. It's like when you wake up to
the mainstream media and you look at it
and you go, how did I ever listen
to this? I hope that's starting to happen
with people like this. It's a very clear
moment where they're you compare them to somebody
with integrity,
who just has principles in general, they look
like cartoons.
Glorifying killers.
Tons of examples. How about just supporting the
ongoing genocide, for for starters?
Drugs? Come on. Really? Or social media? Like,
we're pretending like they don't? I mean, I
I I should end it. I mean, you
guys know where the whole thing goes. Number
four. One of their radicalized, over medicated loners
decides to they can die a hero if
they just kill Hitler?
So are we ignoring the many examples of
right wing shooters that have done the exact
same thing, whether it's about a fascist right
side of it, which has happened too, or
the left?
I mean, they just they just pretend they're
not there. When it turns out the shooter,
which, by the way, is similar, if it
turns out he actually is republican, they just
ignore that and frame it the way they
like or ignore ignore the story entirely when
it turns out to be a veteran or
any number of things they don't like.
Republicans in law enforcement need to seriously change
their mindset on left wing violence.
So this rationalizes
more ICE deployment, more military deployment, more surveillance,
but tailored towards very certain ideology that are
now labeled as terrorists.
Then we just see this
illegitimate, unconstitutional precedent set with Tran de Aragua,
with MS 13, with immigration, or any number
of overlapping points.
We say you're now terrorists, therefore, you can't
be here anymore. These are revoked. Oh, unconstitutional.
We don't care.
Americans.
I mean, there's so and we're gonna
start with getting removed from colleges and your
job fired from your jobs
until eventually, which, you know, who knows, maybe
out the gate, Trump's already floated many times.
Americans are next. I mean, we need to
be able to piece this together.
Charlie Kirk was villainized mercilessly for a decade
up to
and even after his political assassination.
Right.
That's people have every right to say what
they want, guys. I mean, aren't aren't you
the ones telling us free speech is important?
On top of that, there's plenty of things
you could say about Charlie Kirk that are
correct, that you should know, that aren't something
you should praise. But it says check check
Twitch or TikTok or Reddit. They're demonizing,
celebrating, and looking for the next target.
See,
that
is a wild stretch.
If they had evidence of somebody looking for
the next target, you think he wouldn't be
showing you that? You think he would show
you that in this post. They'd be everywhere.
And I guarantee they're somewhere out there, but
he this is them stretching the reality to
make it look a certain way. And what
these really showing you is that they're saying
things that we don't like. But see, unless
you add that last part, they'll recognize that
I'm actually a hypocrite, that I don't care
about free speech. Charlie is a martyr because
he stood against the radicalization and violence of
the left as a tool that used as
a tool.
Right. It's not politics. And so now,
martyrs are okay. I get it. When you
say martyr over in Gaza, they're terrorists. But
when you say martyr here, it's okay. But
this is not politics. It says it's inhuman.
Right.
It's inhuman.
Right. That's literally dehumanizing.
Perfect. It must be exposed. It must be
stopped. It must be destroyed.
I
mean, you know, I don't I don't care
how many ways you try to flavor this
like you're being rational. These are insane, irrational
action post that will drive people to violence.
And is he ever right to say it?
But it's important to call out what the
reality is.
Here's Carrie just with some wisdom in between
it all. The shock and disgust at the
assassination of Charlie Kirk because political violence is
unacceptable, which is what he was just doing,
rest on the delusional idea that politics is
otherwise peaceful and civil.
In reality,
there is nothing peaceful or civilized about government
and political authority.
It is literally backed by the barrels of
guns, and all laws are enforced through violence.
People are conditioned to be blind to this,
but on someone's unconscious level, they must know
or they wouldn't feel so terrified or resentful
toward their perceived enemies gaining power through government
and being able to force their views on
others through politicians and policy, which is what
the right's doing right now. Saying so isn't
intended to minimize the inhumanity of killing anyone.
I hate that we have to say that.
It's pretty clear by our long term actions
that we care regardless of people who have
political opinions, regardless of whether I think he's
doing things that hurt people.
Compassion is important for a human being. And
more importantly, I think, generally, the people that
are left to suffer with what happened, especially
if there's more to the story that the
people pretending to care about him don't want
to see or care about.
But she says,
but it's a fallacious narrative and superficial conversation
to focus on this scourge of political violence
when it's built into the system most people
tolerate and even revere.
As always, Carrie with some, you know,
insightful knowledge and insight.
James Woods, because, you know, he comes at
it every time with the most wildly
over the top hyperbolic statement. Here, this is
a muse saying turning point.
You know, like, this now this would forever
change going forward. Obviously, Turning Point USA, but
the point is clearly they're trying to say
this is now, you know, going forward where
this is a new path. Yes.
James Woods says, well said. This is a
this is the turning point, the turning point.
Dear leftists, he says, we can't have a
conversate we can have a conversation or a
civil war.
One more shot from your side?
Really?
God, these people are stupid, and you will
not get this choice again.
Right. Because James Wood can just, you know,
initiate the civil war.
I honestly think this person is either I
mean, I wonder sometimes because of how much
he inserts himself into the conversation. He's like
this right wing entity. It's do you I
mean, he may be in involved and know
what people are thinking and doing in the
administration,
but I really just think these people are
blind followers.
And it's insulting to us. Like, the idea
if what what I mean, okay. First of
all, again, we don't know who the shooter
was. You haven't proven he's even a lefty.
But you're already saying one more shot from
your side and all of you, every lefty.
You're you're the child born nuts story. I
guess that doesn't count, but that's the religious
point.
People that are identifying that when they're in
kindergarten
or high school. I'm just trying to make
a point. Obviously, there are tons of people
on the left who probably agree with far
more with James Woods than they than he
would like to think on plenty of points
or vice versa. The game they play where
these people are different species is so they
can exploit the differences.
And it's everywhere. That's my point of saying
the mainstream alternative media and the mainstream media
point at each other as if that's the
whole conversation.
There's a whole iceberg down here, guys, of
people that are not stupid as people like
this, who are not as irresponsible and blind
and completely hyperbolic.
You'll not get this choice again, like we're
supposed to pretend like that's not exactly what
you're claiming the left does every day?
I don't see I wonder sometimes if they
truly can't see it in themselves, which is
pretty embarrassing.
Here's
Alex Jones.
On the tenth, again, before they even got
the guy,
the Democrat deep state killed Charlie Kirk in
a desperate attempt to shut down populist free
speech and conservative nationalist voting recruitment on college
campuses.
Right. Very specific.
Good job. Alex broke down the story.
Democrat deep state killed me. My god.
Does alright. Do I even need to add
a comment to that? Like, I would like
to believe that anybody who's not a child
would be like, yeah. That's pretty stupid. I
mean, there's
no way that that he has any insight
and and he doesn't, by the way, because
clearly,
already, most of what he said in the
first day is clearly not actually passing into,
you know, jiving with what happened.
I said, and disgusting use of Charlie's death
by partisan manipulators begins. Out. You are shameless.
Just I just it just kills me.
So many people listen to these people.
Daily McAdams.
Here's Alex Jones, which is what he does.
So he he captions that post, like, thirty
seconds later, shares it again, then cap that,
shares it again, reposts it. It's about blinding
you with the with the one thing. And
he says, the Democrats were threatened by Charlie
Kirk, so they killed him. Oh, so you've
pieced it together and three minutes later, right,
now you know they killed him? We now
never let this message be silenced.
I mean, they're riding a wave of of
screaming rage when you don't even know what
happened. And you I mean, again, I I
can I'm a feel like I'm gonna make
that point a 100 times today.
You just need to understand how clear it
is, and I know you guys probably already
do. Daniel McAdams says, you can always count
on Alex Jones to run cover for the
real deep state. See, there are people out
there that aren't stupid enough to fall for
this.
And I don't even mean, like, weather at
the start. I mean, the way that the
partisan game plays itself.
He also says Alex Jones runs interference for
the real killers as usual.
Here's Laura Loomer. It's time for the Trump
administration to shut down, defund, and prosecute
every leftist organization.
See what I mean? You You know what
I mean?
Like, the idea that you can just just
every single leftist organization I I mean, I'd
like to believe there's more adults in this
conversation, left or right, partisan or otherwise, that
are gonna be like, okay. We're not all
this stupid. The the problem is that even
those people that recognize this is stupid,
support it because team sport politics.
Act like Loomer is some journalist of her
time. She's a child in this conversation who's
got far too much attention and far too
much reach and resources, and I think we
know why. The bottom line is whether that's
even the case, because it's not provable. I
mean, it is in some cases, but it's
not the point for today,
is that this is hyperbolic
by definition.
Every leftist organization
and the idea that you should ultimately
prosecute them
because, you know, we'll find a crime. Right?
We don't even know, but we'll we'll find
a crime.
If Charlie Kirk dies from his injuries,
his life cannot be in vain. So you're
using him before he even dies to argue
some kind of mission based on the attack
to go after left I mean,
we must shut these lunatic leftists down, she
says. Shut it down once and for all.
The left is the national security threat. You
see, she always pushes the envelope because she
got the so the talking point is clearly
that we have to make this about domestic
terrorism. There's bigger than just the fact that
they hate it. That's where this is going,
which leads into all the big problems that
we're always talking about, and she just is
clumsy about it.
Trump.
He's asked if he's worried about his own
safety,
and he responds by saying he's only worried
about the country.
He proceeds to say, we have a, quote,
radical left group of lunatics in America, and
we're going to get that problem solved.
Great.
So you know where this goes, guys.
This builds into what and whether it's giddy
and an AI precrime or gun manipul I
mean, digital ID, everything
we've talked about.
And watch as the right just gobbles it
down even though it's exactly what they claim
they were fighting.
Here's David Icke. Now, this is Alex Jones
the next day or today, technically. And it
is
because they reported the the person caught. Now
I just think this is really interesting to
think about. I I agree entirely with that
with, David Ike.
This is Alex Jones blindly taking a face
value instantly when it's reported what the corporate
media and the government say.
Doesn't that seem embarrassing for somebody for what
he's been doing?
That he he immediately post this, the the
crazed Antifa killer.
Oh, so it's Antifa now. Have you proven
that? Is there any evidence behind that Other
than this flimsy claim that some that somebody
says fascist, therefore now they're Antifa, even though
Antifa is inherently
fascist? You know this guy doesn't care about
any of that. And it says, he's in
custody. And he and he's full of Trump
hate. Plan the attack online.
Oh, you oh, oops. That's wrong too. But
you see, you don't check those facts. The
discords the information's changed now, but we don't
care about that. We'll run with the narrative
because we set that before we even knew
the guy was arrested. Right? They hate us.
They're coming for us. They plan the attack.
They're working with left wing groups on discord.
Oops. It's all fake. Who cares, though?
He came out with this instantly and screamed
the idea. He he shows his phone in
the picture
and simply goes, look. We got him.
That's that's that's the government saying this happened,
him blindly repeating for you.
You know you see what that is. That
is the same that is the propaganda multiplier
coming down from the top through people like
Alex Jones and right into you. Is that
is that the rebel flying the deep state?
Sure. You can piece that together. David Ike
says, first of all, you hold your judgment
until all the evidence and background is available,
and don't make definitive judgments minute by minute.
I mean, have we forgotten all of that?
I mean, how is the where are the
grown ups in the room in this conversation?
Shouldn't they be all going, Alex, you're ridiculous.
Why would you do that? No. They're like,
my team. My team. My agenda. Even though
we know it all looks dumb, he's helping.
People are listening.
Obviously, we shouldn't jump to conclusions even if
you think you can trust the government.
Would you that what what could happen in
the beginning? The guy got arrested with a
blue shirt, and they all jumped on and
said, Liberal. Oops. He got he got let
go. Next guy got arrested. Liberal. We knew
it. Maybe it happens again.
You could piece that together too.
He goes on to say,
and secondly,
something crucial is missing here. Alex Jones talks
about the left and Antifa, etcetera. And, of
course, there is a violent element to that,
obviously,
as there are violent elements on the right.
The point is that you see the game
you that to see the game, you have
to go beyond the left to right to
the level of the global cult that works
through them both. Now whether you think that's
the case or not,
be you have to start seeing beyond the
obvious binary nature of the two party illusion.
I I mean, that's an that's an absolute
must today.
And it is a provable thing that you
can see
if you just stand back and look. So
what he's saying is that you have to
understand this. You have to look at it
from a point that this is one entity
carrying out these agendas,
or at least consider that. And when you
do, when you look at it, it's impossible
to miss. It says that is the level
that plays off left against right and sets
them at war with each other
while the same force is pulling the strings
of both. Trump is controlled by the same
force as Antifa.
Once one creates the problem for which the
other provides the solution that advances the cult
agenda to an even more dystopian society,
the left provides the solution to the right
when it is in power
and vice versa.
That that's what I was just saying. Right?
But the point is depending on who's in
power, that's how that ultimately goes, and it
happens every time.
When he says
where was I?
Why don't I just leave office? Left provides
a solution to the right when it's in
power and vice versa when the right is
in power as currently with Trump. Both solutions
lead to a more authoritarian society.
And what? Watch as that quite literally happen,
and it's already happening.
But it doesn't matter because we got the
Democrat. Right? That that's how these people at
the top of team sport politics play. And
you see it happening. I mean, look at
what Trump's already rolled out. There's no way
to argue these things aren't authoritarian, but it's
just okay now because it'll be good in
the long term. Sorta like your tariffs are
gonna benefit everybody. How's that working out? Says
this is why we have troops on on
the streets in America and gathering totalitarianism
thanks to the right, while civil liberties and
freedoms are being targeted in The UK by
a government claiming to be left.
Now see, I don't agree with everything David
Icke says or pretty much anybody for that
matter, but this is why I support him
so much because this is a core, core
point
that very I mean, I shouldn't say very
few, but not enough people seem to truly
at least express publicly.
Trump targets the left, while Starmer targets the
right, and both serve the interest of the
cult agenda for global dystopia.
This is what the Alex Jones Joneses don't
get on the right and left. And so
both play their essential role in dividing
so the cult can rule while largely having
no idea,
being optimistic that both political pro polarities are
being played by the same force. This is
why we have to go beyond constant emotional
reaction, how long we've been saying that, and
calmly see how the game is played. If
we don't understand the game and how it
manipulates perception and emotion, then the game will
go on playing us. This is the real
wake up, not the fake one. Now realize
what just happened, how emotional that is for
everybody. That that means in some cases, it
should be emotional. But realize,
emotion
circumvents logic. That's why these are used this
way. Even if it was an organic event,
why it is still used by Trump and
everybody else doing it. I mean, look at
what's going on with every country everywhere, all
these full page reports
because it it's valuable to them. It can
be used to drive action.
I think this is quite obvious, and you
think people like Jones don't see that?
Now David seems to think maybe he doesn't.
I don't know. I think it's obvious. I
think these people are using you.
As David says, the script. Here's,
Walsh from the Daily Wire. Charlie tried to
have a conversation with you on the left,
and you killed him for it.
You're killing our you're killing us in our
churches.
You tried to kill our president. You celebrate
Charlie's death. It's time for good to fight
back against evil.
So, in that case, all the left people
are the evil and all the right people
are the good. Right. Despite the obvious overlap
of both of those things.
Same point. I mean, I really I wanna
make it every time in case there's somebody
not listening, but I don't wanna be that
redundant. The point is, obviously,
this exists on both sides because it is
driven intentionally
from both sides.
And and again, the hyperbolic nature of you
killed us,
so irresponsible.
Here is Steven Crowder with Megyn Kelly. I'm
not advocating blood in the streets, and I'm
certainly not supporting it. But you know what?
I get it.
Of course you do. I get it. I'm
you know, why wouldn't they you know, and
look, there's a point you made about saying,
you know, like I've said in the past,
I understand why this action might be taken.
But if you listen to the way this
is reported, that's very much not what's happening
here. It's like an aggressive argument that this
is where we should be right now. And
as he says, the script,
they're driving
in irrational hatred and violence against
half of the country.
Because that makes sense, right? That'll lead to
something good.
Because I mean, look, even if you wanna
pretend or look, even if you wanna acknowledge,
because again, the point is the ideology is
toxic, but it's the same kind of problem
for both sides. But even if we won't
acknowledge the toxicity of the left ideology,
you you have to be honest enough to
say that that's not every single person,
Just like we can say that, like, Zionism,
for example, that I there's you you think
every Israeli in the country? No. I can
prove you that's not the case. Or every
Jew? No. That's changing rapidly today. You see,
the point is the same here. For them
to just keep doing that is be not
because they care about solving the problem, because
they're using this broad stroke irrational action to
drive in their policy, their agenda.
There's plenty of left people out there that
agree with exactly what I'm saying in regard
to constitutionality
or or plenty of right that agree in
the same case with plenty of lefties about
I mean, there's plenty of left people that
I was with calling out masks. You know
what I mean? It's just it's just lazy
to keep making this as such an obvious
divide. The divide is the government.
Sean Ona Lennon says,
maybe I don't know. Maybe how do you
say it with an accent? Seon? He says,
someone is trying to radicalize us. And yes,
they're trying to radicalize both sides against each
other, and it's working.
A lot of a lot of spread on
this, guys. Like, I mean, I there is
a thirst for the actual
this is what I just hope you can
see through see through the cracks, through the
algorithms, through the false impressions from everything we
get, and recognize that there is a large
amount of people who want this to be
discussed, who recognize this is where we are.
And they say it's working. We're being pitted
against each other. And there doesn't seem to
be any way to stop it other than
turning off your phones and your TV. That's
for you to decide, but that's one solution.
And it says, and going outside to hang
out with the real flesh and blood people.
They keep feeding us the most horrible versions
of each other. Now that's the sentence I
want you to think about.
I mean, this is what we keep seeing
in every possible side of this. They keep
pumping it for, like, what you you know,
a guy stabs somebody, and it becomes, this
is what we're doing. This is the country
we're you know, the country's fallen. This is
that look. This is what they've done to
us. It's like it's
it's one example of one act of violence
that can happen in any context from any
skin color and actually does. Now, yes, there
are points to be made about whether that
person was an immigrant and how that ended
up happening, But it is so shockingly disgusting
to just go ever. This is what's happening.
And I am not lost on a large
agenda. I've talked about it probably before most
of you have. All the ones out there
who all raised up about it. I've been
talking about this for years. And the reality
of weaponized immigration, weaponized migration, and how it's
being used from Israel and plenty of others.
I understand
George Soros' larger points in the in the
same things happening on the right.
I also recognize that it's stupid and childish
to pretend that even then, that means every
single person in any category.
They're feeding us the most horrible versions of
each other.
That's the the worst examples, the hyperbolic things,
the the MEMR channel about Muslims. Like, these
are that is an Israeli intelligence operation. It's
provably run by Israeli intelligence, but people use
it to frame Muslims. It's how this works.
In the case of left right, you got
these left right manipulators who are pumping the
worst things they can find. And in many
cases, very real, people like that exist. But
pretending that's what the leftists are doing, what
the rights are doing, it's just not the
reality. The algorithms are.
That's what's dividing us.
But who makes the algorithm?
Who really benefits from us being at each
other's throats?
If you let the algos convince you that
the other side is evil, then you have
been psyopt.
Yes. There are evil people, but most people
are not. I believe that. When letting your
ourselves be defined by the absolute worst examples
at the extremes,
that's what they keep showing us on every
news channel and every social media feed. The
worst of the worst. It is designed to
foment us into anger and self destruction. I
don't know why exactly, she says.
Could be as simple as divide and conquer.
Probably is. Don't swallow the psyop.
I really appreciate that. Breath of fresh air.
Greg Reese put simply says, civil war is
for the cowards, too weak to unite against
a tyrannical government.
I hope that hits the mark where it's
aimed at. Right? There are all these fake
patriots out there screaming about taking down the
left because they're too cowardly to recognize the
real threat
or don't care.
Now here's what Trump said about this. He
was asked, how do we fix this country?
One, he I I mean, I don't know
if we maybe misunderstood the question,
but because they frame it as both sides,
their prop problems, and then says, how do
we he says, I couldn't care less.
And then it's cut off, but it goes
on to make the point of when you
watch the full interview
about the that, you know, kind of rationalizing
why Republicans may be somewhat violent, but they
do it for good reason.
Just there's an agenda, guys, and it's lazy,
and these are the worst people in the
world. I mean, this is where we've gotten
to where these are the people they use
to relay it, the clumsy, dishonest ones that
expose their lies every day. Makes you wonder
why and who's driving that. But either way,
here's what he said. We're gonna look into
it. What do we do about our country
with that? Because we have radicals on the
right as well. We have radicals on the
left. People have gotten are watching all of
these videos and cheering.
Some people are cheering that Charlie was was
killed.
How do we fix this country? How do
we come back together? I'll tell you something
that's gonna get me in trouble, but I
couldn't care less. The radical Okay. So he
goes on another thought.
I don't know. I I it's pretty easy.
I think he clearly heard that. I couldn't
care less.
I mean, what do you think that means?
I think it's one of his honest statements
that we get sometimes where at the end
of the day, he's like, I don't care.
I'm I'm I'm building your technocratic prison. Why
do I care what you guys think or
whether you're okay? But, of course, that's not
what his supporters think. But pretty clearly, historically,
what his actions show, but they don't wanna
hear that. But, oh, maybe he just misspoke.
Pretty weird. But then I'll plug go back
a couple seconds. He goes on to make
the statement about why but the right are
not really as bad as the left is
what he's getting at. Typical. Something's gonna get
me in trouble, but I couldn't care less.
The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical
because they don't wanna see crime. Oh, yeah.
Oh, that's why. We wanna be radical and
commit crimes to stop crime.
It's it's just a very it's it's a
statement that is meant to be taken blind
with people that want to agree with that
and say, yeah, because we're radical for the
right reasons. That's the takeaway.
Well, they both think they have the right
reason, don't they? Both side go, well, we're
the right one. We're both doing radical things,
but you're you're the one that's really the
problem. So my radicalness is to stop your
radicalness because we're the good guys and you're
the bad guys. These are the children in
the room, guys. It's pretty obvious right now
if you're just paying attention.
Now this is Stephen Miller.
There's plenty of examples of Trump and others
who are very much driving this
in. You know, the TikTok, of course, is,
oh my god. Monroe Falls, Ohio, council vice
president. Quote, the world is a better place
now that he's gone.
As we said, yeah. And that's lacking decorum,
especially right after it happens. His family's suffering.
But is that is he not allowed to
say that? Yeah. Obviously, he's right to say
that. That's free speech. On top of that,
that's an opinion that somebody might share. Right?
That that's like Tom McCain or,
John McCain dies. Something I said as well.
Well, the world's a better place today. Yeah.
And that man sold a lot of people.
I don't necessarily think that with Kirk in
particular.
I think John McCain is you know, there's
some of these people that I would just
go yes that he's a villainous person his
entire life. I think there's things that even
I agree with Charlie Kirk in some context,
but I think he was very clearly part
of a larger manipulation.
My point, though, is that why is it
okay for them to say it in cases
about the right or the or out the
left, which has happened many times? Or a
person like me who's in who's not left
or right willing to say that I think
John McCain or other politicians that pass away,
it's a good thing that it happened. It's
better the world is not as bad because
they're gone, which is gonna people hated that
in some cases. But you see what I'm
getting at? Those of us that are able
to apply the logic of free speech and
the logic of those things in all context
recognize
how funny it is when one side's outraged
about the other and then it flip flops.
And the other side's outraged and one side's
going, it's okay. It's free speech. Both of
them do that, and this is my case.
You know, it's it's ever and the point
is hypocrisy.
They must be able to see that in
themselves, which means they don't really care about
free speech. They care about using whatever they
can to achieve their agenda or just simply
dunk on the other side because they're children.
Oops.
Going back one.
Stephen Miller says, we haven't even begun to
grapple with the fact that a huge portion
of our society
have been fully
and dangerously radicalized by a closed circuit of
radical left propaganda.
Right. You know, and the exact same statement
with the right propaganda, but Stephen Miller is
working for something outside of American interests and
very clearly wants to divide this country.
Now what's interesting to me, and in no
way am I suggesting that the left is
you know, that Chuck Schumer even cares. And
frankly, I don't think he cares about anything
other than his own selfless agenda, but I
found it interesting. And I want him to
first point so he responded in a way
that's like, let's call it a piece, whatever.
What's interesting to me, and I
yeah. I I don't even I didn't even
download it. I just wanna make the point.
Is
every time the other side
is being the one that's irrational,
what's the other side do? Well, they use
it to it's sort of like when I
think all of them are called kind of
worried about the Epstein list coming out. But
because it's currently on the, like, the the
the balls in Trump's court and he's the
one that has to decide, you got the
left going, release it, release it. If you
don't, you're guilty, knowing that he doesn't want
to. Like, that's my point. Because I think
when it flip flops and now they're in
charge, they'll be the ones acting like, we
have victims, we have to care. And then
the right would be the ones going, release
it, we know.
Probably knowing that it's not gonna happen regardless.
You get my point? And so, when this
is happening,
and Chuck Schumer comes out and says, coming
together is what we ought to be doing,
not pointing fingers of blame.
Yeah, I don't believe he cares about these
things. I think all of these people are
manipulative, shifty politicians
who are now what he's doing is coming
out knowing that he's gonna look like the
rational one and knowing that the idiots like
Nick Sord are gonna take the bait, and
they're gonna go, no. This is what Nick
wrote. Screw you, Chuck. Your party did this.
I increasingly look at Nick like the like,
if you're if we're children in the room,
he's the he's the kindergarten.
He's just he's actually genuinely childish for the
way he presents these things. But he says,
years of Democrats calling conservatives literal Nazis did
this. Oh, that's what did it?
Not not the that's the radicalization,
calling you calling people? Like, it's just embarrassing
to me. First of all,
that doesn't mean anything. If somebody wanna calling
them Nazis is not responsible for people taking
irrational action. That's childishly stupid, but it can
drive there and that they did, it's their
fault. Their choices. People can make their own
choices.
But it's also exactly what both sides do.
Obviously, that's the same point.
You call the Nazis, they call you fascist,
or they call you fascist, you call them
pedophiles. You it's, you know, back and forth.
You have your little game.
But the point is the same. You're gonna
destroy the world if we don't stop what
Trump's doing. Right? You're gonna end the country
if we don't stop what Biden's doing. It's
the same game, guys. They do the same
thing.
So the point is that people who take
irrational action and do carry out violence, well,
you arrest them. You charge them for a
crime. End of story.
And if there's some kind of evidence that
suggests there's a larger network of effort, well,
then you go after the network. End of
story.
But the game of making it about the
entire half of the country is either what
Nick is being used to create because he
doesn't realize it or or because he doesn't
care and he wants to make money as
it all goes down.
But this is them trying to make it
about like, by pulling on top of it
all was you even have him coming out
going, hey. How about peace? And they're like,
screw you. We're the peace party. Screw you,
liar. It's like, well, I don't think that
looks the way you want it to, Nick,
but I don't think they care.
Sassafras says, I will not stop. You killed
Charlie Kirk.
And all all this is is a is
a song. What is it?
Phil Collins? So stupid. It's just a Phil
Collins song
and a screenshot of Joe Biden's tweet that
says Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are a
threat to the very soul of the country.
And, yeah, and greatest threat to our democracy,
genuine touch of our nation. Okay.
Whether you agree with that or not, is
that is that not free speech? Yes. It
is. And And in many cases, you could
argue that is the case just as much
as the left side of the problem as
this is a threat to the very soul
of what the country is because the government
is clearly threatening and undermining the foundational elements
of this country.
So is it Joe Biden's fault for pointing
it out on half the government? Well, you
could argue that it led to somebody's choices,
but it's still not that he killed them.
It's the same kind of thing that you
would make fun of if you if they
were pointing out something you said yesterday and
why a radical person killed somebody on the
right or the left.
Or I'm just that sounded confusing. The bottom
line is that you can see it going
either way.
These people have made just as many irrational
statements. In fact, I thought I grabbed one,
actually. Let me think.
No. I guess I didn't. But I the
the point was, you know as well as
I that you like, this statement right here.
We've seen every single politician that I know
of on those, like, the strong especially in
Trump's cabinet almost every day. Trump says this
kind of thing almost every I just showed
you. He just said radical left lunatics are
going to destroy the country. It's the same
thing.
They keep saying it. So what's the difference?
Well, they are actually radical. Okay.
That's how that's what it comes down to
every time. We're doing the same thing, but
they're actually the bad guys, and we're only
being radical to stop the bad guys. But
when you stand back, they're both being radical,
both causing the same things, what both sides
react to. So, really, it's just opinion that
changes the whole thing.
Here's James Woods yet again, and he says,
you, sir, have blood on your hands
for posting. I mean, I'll play it for
you, I think. Yep. Former chairman of the
joint chiefs of staff, Mark Milley, said,
no one has ever been more dangerous to
this country than Donald Trump, and he is
a fascist to his core.
Okay. Let that sink in, and don't be
a damn bit afraid of saying it because
that's exactly who he is. Well, first of
all, he is and so is Biden.
So this little, you know, clerk pearl clutching
game you're all playing where it's like, how
dare you say the thing that he obviously
yes. He is. And the idea that what
you're saying here first, second or secondly, by
the way,
is that him saying this about Trump somehow
is
responsible for killing Charlie?
I mean, they're just being lazy with this
right now. They're just now they're just expanding
it into anything made bad about Trump. Now
it's just why any lefty attacks a republican
anywhere in the world. It is so so,
abstract.
But the overall true point is, yes, these
people are authoritarian fascist. You can prove that.
They they'll only make it about one side
even though the policies continue the same way,
because it shows you either stupid or blind
they are. But the idea that you're saying
is a threat to the country. Well, quite
frankly, I think the government is a threat
to this country.
Same point.
But this just continues to go around and
around. All they continue to do Former Oops,
wrong one. All they continue to do is
push this in a direction that is literally
causing the very thing they claim they're afraid
of happening. Here's James Woods doing the same
thing. Same point. Here's a road map to
Charlie Kirk's assassination.
More of the exact same.
Oh, you know what? It's I think I
didn't grab for the same re the very
reason.
It's the same thing. It's literally everyone of
them going around saying, Trump's a threat. He's
a fascist. Wait. Well, yeah, guys. That's not
different than the same things you say in
reverse, and at the end of the day,
many of those claims are true on both
sides of the paradigm. All they want you
to think is somehow them saying Trump is
dangerous is the reason that somebody got shot,
and it's the same kind of thing that
they would push back on in reverse and
have many times. Nicholas Fuentes says the left
is now shamelessly trying to blame the right
for the murder of Charlie Kirk, which they
have been openly celebrating and justifying for days.
I mean, the point is, it's exactly what
I'm saying. They come back and they do
the same thing.
Oh, you did it with all of your
with all of your radicalization and your threats
and blame and pretending how bad we are,
you know, blah blah blah. They just continue
to go back and forth with the whole
thing, trying to blame the right for the
murder of Charlie. In this case, what what
he's saying is actually that somehow that their,
you know,
basically their allowance of certain things, gun laws,
you know, whatever causes to happen. It's the
same thing we've seen every time. When neither
of them have any evidence to any of
it, they're all pointing to their opinions. And
he says, they have no charity, love, or
humanity for any of their any of us
or our families. See, Nick is the same
thing when it comes down to with this
kind of topic point. It is a irresponsible,
broad talking point that every single person out
there that's left hates you and your family.
It's just disgusting at the end of the
day. It really is. And it is not
it is in the interest of dividing this
country, whether he knows that or not. We
must take power from our own survival. We
win or die. We win or we die.
Okay.
I mean, look, this guy calls out Israel
all the time. I think, literally, whether he
knows it or not, what he's doing here
is in the interest of what Israel is
trying to do in this country. Hope he
hears that.
Matt Kennard says, a key part of Zionism
as a global movement is the promotion of
Islamophobia
and fascism. So here's where Netanyahu steps in.
I haven't gotten into the weirdness of it
all of Netanyahu personally and, like, every Israeli
intelligence entity somehow coming online and going, Charlie
was the best thing Israel ever saw. Weird.
Like, instantly.
And we're gonna get into the Israel overlap,
obviously. That's where this whole thing is heading
to. The point is to understand where this
real situation is, you know, the the whole
the full thing.
So
Netanyahu goes on Fox News
and pushes that left leaning organizations
and Muslims were why Charlie got killed.
He's just adding in. You know, he's he's
gotta warp it into what he's focused on.
Right? It just shows you that they're all
just choosing to use it for their agenda.
And I genuinely think that this is being
driven through that agenda. And he says, it's
why people like Tommy Robinson, Gert Wilders, and
Viktor Orban are such fans.
The Israel lobby needs to be shut down
as a matter of urgency
Washington,
London, Berlin, and everywhere. I absolutely agree with
that. Here's what Netanyahu said.
Worldwide problem.
The the people on on the, you know,
on the extremes, the the Islamist, the radical
Islamists, and the their union with the ultra
progressives,
they often speak about human rights. They speak
about free speech, but they use violence
to try to
take down their enemies, whether it's president and
trial. Think about this guy saying that right
now. You You know? And he knows that.
Like, I think he gets a thrill out
of standing there knowing it even largely the
right side of the conversation, which he's complained
about,
knows that he's starving children to death, raping
and torturing and murdering an entire population. And
he's over there going, they don't care about
human rights. I mean, it it makes me
sick.
A player who's
been almost assassinated twice or, you know, they
tried to kill me here too,
but they got Charlie Kirk, and it's just
heartbreaking.
Ugh. Got the guy. So it's just really
unnerving sometimes how Netanyahu
is don't have words.
Key part of Zionism.
Very much so. The promotion of Islamophobia and
fascism,
which look at what's happening in this country,
guys.
Obviously. Now Dan Fuego says it's interesting to
see when people pick and choose to believe
government narratives.
Right? Hope the right's listening. You know? The
the OG conspiracy theorist out there, the rebels
fight the deep state who are now just
blindly gobbling up what the government tells them.
Instead of taking a position of skepticism or
incredulity,
they pounce on anything that confirms their biases
without nary a hint of suspicion.
That's some low IQ behavior, and it's both
sides of the paradigm when it suits their
interests.
Now talking about where this is going,
suppression of rights. In one case,
I mean, it really is incredible to me
how you can be standing there like Womer
and mothers acting like, you know, literally just
talking about the virtues of free speech and
being able to say what you want and
then having this happen.
So, look, I agree. What this guy is
saying is, I mean,
what's the best word for it?
Just lacking of empathy. You know, what he
what he's doing is it's it's insulting to
to the the fact that the person was
killed.
But in every possible way, he has the
right to say what he's saying right here.
And
here's Laura Loomer
saying this literally the first thing she says
for the podcast, this is not freedom of
speech.
That's what she's saying. This self professed champion
of free speech is telling you that this
person speaking on the street is not free
speech. She says, this is glorification of violence.
Oh, that sounds familiar.
Isn't that that term that YouTube was using
to censor people who were
speaking within free speech? Yes. It was. And
it should be illegal, she says. Here is
Laura Loomer calling for speech to be illegal
because she doesn't like it.
What a clown. I mean, just genuinely at
its core, but also very clearly acting for
other interests. Who else is driving this in?
There's plenty of examples.
Should be illegal.
Glorification of violence. Now that's not even well,
I guess, you could argue that's exactly what
it's doing.
But the idea is saying well, I mean,
let's play it for you. He says she
she has she says it makes me weep
that that there is never any accountability for
the for anything in this in our country.
God, this person's disgusting. Maybe there will never
be either.
What a dump that's a dumb thing to
end with. Maybe what? She well, it's black
pill to go look at it, but it's
well poorly written. But the point is clearly
never accountability. I mean, aren't you, like, every
third second going, I just made this happen.
We got them. Well, isn't that, you know
oh, so maybe you're lying about all those
things. Either way, here's what this guy said.
You get
it. I mean, it's you know, even I
would say it's just like, what's the point?
Right? I mean, but here's the interesting part
about this.
And and as as usual, like, right now,
to start, it's it's the right is pretty
vulnerable. And I think we all see that
for a thousand reasons. Whether it's desperately defending
Trump when you're spitting in your face or
the fact that it's like just going so
shockingly the direction you, you know, or that
you're fighting against the people that you thought
you were on the side of when they're
literally cheering on the foot you think you're
fighting or Maha, you know, whatever it is.
They're vulnerable. It's very clear that they're they're
and what's funny is that you have people
like this, actually funny, it's just that it's
it's I mean, like like, it's, ironic is
the point what I meant.
Trolling them.
Lewer's being trolled by this guy. He's trolling,
trolling you.
And you are reacting and taking the bait.
So you are exactly the left that you
always make fun of. The snowflake over here
who can't you know? And so look look.
It's free speech. He has a right to
say what he wants. He's out there in
the middle of an open sidewalk saying what
he wants, and you're trying to get him
shut down for that. You are you are
exactly what you always make fun of.
And anybody could point out that that's insulting.
The family, to the you know, but it
is free speech.
And so as we get into this direction,
we're seeing calls in every direction to shut
down speech, which is usually what this is
about. At least, you know, the shut the
use of these things to take action against
you.
Here is Eric Daugherty saying, Marco Rubio, state
department will ban any foreigner from entering the
country who celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Sure. They would love to play the game
where it's well it's a privilege. And I
on the side of before they've been brought
in,
as much as that's the stupidest thing in
the world to use to just they can
dictate that and get letting people in the
country because it's not some absolute requirement. Right?
But once they let them in the country,
this is what we've talked about many times
in regard to the legalities of constitutional rights,
whether or not you're an illegal alien, a
Visa card holder, or a green card holder.
Again, the the reality of we're we're in
a world where people still pretend like that's
not true is mind blowing. It is two
seconds away from you on Google. Look it
up. It is the case. Yes. Illegal aliens
are protected under the constitution. The point is
that this is now where they're going on,
not on top of not just people or
on top of people coming in,
but deporting people who celebrated Charlie Kirk.
A state department official on Thursday warned foreigners
in The US against praising the death of
Charlie Kirk, the conservative influencer who was shot
and killed at the event. In light of
yesterday's horrific assassination of a leading political figure,
I want to underscore that foreigners who glorify
violence and hatred are not welcome to visitors
in our country.
I have been disgusted, it says, to see
some of the social media praising, rationalization,
and making light of the event, and I've
directed our councilor officials to undertake appropriate action.
These people here,
please feel free to bring such comments to
buy foreigners to my attention so that we
can protect the American people
from free speech.
I mean, this is it's my point. I
can equally oh, look. I look. If this
you have to understand. If this was something
that was, like, emotional to me,
hopefully, I've proven that over the years. I
would still be saying the same thing. All
this is proving is that when it's in
their interest, they wanna shut it down. When
it's the other side, they wanna keep they
want, you know, they wanna blame. It's always
about pointing fingers. In this case, if you're
over here saying, I don't care. Remove it
or or rather kick me out of the
country because I'm upset and I like Charlie
Kirk, well, then you are admitting that you
care more about your emotional attachment than you
do about the foundational point of constitutional rights
or any number of laws.
That's the reality, guys, and it's just simply
not the case. It's not it is hypocritical.
There I mean, every situation right now, they
are driving Americans to feel okay about ignoring
or letting them ignore your constitutional
rights.
And this is one of those examples.
US Coast Guard. Coast Guard's aware of inappropriate
personal
personal social media activity.
Personal social media activity made by a member
regarding recent political violence.
That social media activity is contrary to our
core values.
With the support of the DHS, we are
actively investigating the activity and will take appropriate
action to hold individuals accountable. Sure. As always,
the argument's gonna be, you know, you could
say it all you all you want, and
they have the right to say it's not
aligned with our values. Well, okay. I there's
a level with the military where you could
argue that is, I wouldn't say acceptable. It's
unconstitutional.
But it's like with a business, they're saying,
well, we don't want you in this because
you are saying bad things on social media.
Now my point is you understand it. From
a coast guard position or any parts of
the military,
that's unconstitutional. But see, they don't care about
any of this right now. They don't care.
You're saying something within your rights online, they're
saying that doesn't align with our values.
Fine. So you wrote something down that says
our values, and if you disagree, your that
doesn't change the constitution, guys. It's this is
the core point. If it's repugnant to the
constitution, it's null and void as a law.
Mabry versus Madison 18 o three.
All they're doing is just normalizing you with
this idea that they can control your ideas
and your thoughts and your speech, at least
right now in this category, until it broadens
out into, well, also your job, well, also
when you're in the street in public, well,
also when that's how this works.
This is the same thing.
And look, I'm not saying I agree. I've
there's plenty of examples of people saying things
that I would be like, you're disgusting for
saying that. But I will defend your right
to say it.
Another
one of the, what, hundreds of now White
House accounts they have, whatever this is, DOW
rapid response. It says, the Department of War
maintains a zero tolerance policy for military personnel,
Department of War civilians
who celebrate or mock the assassination.
Same thing. Same point.
Your your freedom of speech US government is
now shutting down people's rights to express what
they think if it's upsetting.
Because that's okay. Right? If it insults me,
then that's that's okay. For constitution aside, I
that bugs me, so let's get rid of
it.
Laugh at those people, guys. That's ridiculous.
Here's a person in the government who swore
an oath to this constitution.
Preliminary evidence indicates the suspect shared messages on
Discord. Oops. That's actually not true. But who
cares? We're already rushing forward with censorship on
these platforms that's already happened. Yep. After the
Butler, Pennsylvania attempt in in Trump's in July
2024,
investigators also found the shooter used Discord account.
So quick, shut down Discord. Isn't it the
point that you all made when they attacked
Parler and other right platforms
when when other people are in power that
how dare they shut down our platforms? They
post it everywhere. I mean, it's the same
game every time. Online platforms include Discord or
being exploited by extremists for recruitment radicalization.
Well, is it I mean, here's the thing
as always. When people commit crimes, you can
arrest them for those crimes.
The idea of the hype look. The idea
of saying we have to stop these crimes
because it's building behind us is no different
than saying we see the threat of a
pathogen coming, and we have to stop before
it happens.
Yeah. Certainly could happen, guys, but people have
rights. And the idea that people could like,
they could be talking about these things and
just wanna talk about them, and they don't
wanna carry them out. I'm not trying to
defend extremist action. What I'm saying is that
they governments will historically always build a narrative
like this. And even if it's actually happening
like we mentioned with that Elizabeth the the
conversation of the nine eleven
issue building, we don't know how to stop
it. Was it Elizabeth Newman, I think?
The point was clear. They're not breaking the
law. They're acting within their rights, but it's
they're doing so knowing they're right under the
radar. So we have to remove those blocks
so we can go after them because we
know they're gonna carry an act. So all
you're saying is they're not breaking the law.
So change the law so we can get
them before it happens.
Assuming we know it was ever gonna happen.
I just think it's so obvious that you
can see what they're doing here.
Exploited.
Extremist. Is it the same language they were
using about your red hats, the trucker convoy?
The same thing.
Urge FBI to investigate the suspects' online activity
and any radicalization
networks. So anybody, anywhere talking about your your
now your privacy, your rights are being violated
because of this story. Here she is again
saying I'm calling on Elon Musk. This was
the tenth.
On, you know, TikTok, all these different platforms
to remove the horrifying videos of Charlie Kirk's
murder.
Well, I remember a time when the right
was outraged. The left was doing that of
other shootings.
Funny how we forget those things, though. Right?
Now it doesn't even matter. In this in
this point, it's not about whether it should
be. It's about the hypocrisy. It's about how
it's played both sides, which both in over
the time of many administrations
leads into one very clear unified direction.
Where are all the Republicans who were outraged
when the left did this at previous shootings?
Why aren't you calling them out?
Because you you're bothered that Charlie's being, you
know, exploited.
Because that that shows that you're hypocritical.
The point should be that this is about
information. The point this comes down to the
idea that people were upset about being like,
we wanna access the information. We wanna be
able to look for ourselves and understand what's
happening.
Whether it's about somebody being shot or things
that are violent, you know, there's always a
rationale.
But maybe you think it should be deleted.
That's for you to decide. That's a conversation
to be had. I just wanna point out
that the people who are claiming it was
wrong before are okay with it now. He
has a family, young children that should know
and should be forced to relive that tragedy.
I agree.
These are not only but, of course, that's
something they don't have to look at. It's
online, and these things will not be removed
regardless of what they do. Everyone has it.
Everyone's downloaded this. It's gotta find its way
back. They know that.
And usually, when they try to suppress it
is when it gets more reach. These are
not the only graphic videos of horrifying murder
circulating at some point. Social media begins to
desensitize humanity. We must all still
oh, great.
Now we played them all down. Look. She
didn't even she couldn't get past Charlie's sentiment.
In the same paragraph, she's saying, and by
the way, let's get rid of all the
violent videos.
Really? How did that fly to the radar?
Matt says, this is insane, and you're on
the JFK assassination committee?
Come on, guys.
Call these people out. Here she is again.
Representative Anna Polina Luna. There has been full
cooperation from every company that I've contacted
far
so far regarding the enforcement of the social
media policies in terms of service. Yep. There
you go. Every one of them, Twitter, all
of them immediately responded. Government has demand. They
do what they're told. Pretty sure you could
piece that one together.
Here, they're censoring content.
So that's hard to see.
And I guess that means all the other
violent stuff too they wanna get rid of.
Who knows what else has been removed so
far?
Update, CEO of Reddit.
We're watching this stuff closely. We have policies
and are enforcing them against violent content and
glorifying violence.
So the point becomes,
how where's the line?
Right? If I'm out there saying something that
they decide is glorifying violence, well, where's the
line? Well, they decide. There's no law in
place. They get to subjectively do. And you
know what that sounds like? It sounds like
hate speech because that's exactly what it is.
Political hate speech. That's all it is. They
can decide where the line is. We argue
that. Well, you're a Palestinian. Oh, that's very
clear. These people are very clearly driving us
in a dangerous direction, and these Republicans
are driving it forward. They're I mean, they're
pound their what's the right analogy? Their their
foot's up, like, their
I screwed that one up. Their foot's on
the gas, but the bottom line clearly is
that they are pushing this forward. They're driving
this aggressively, and it's going against what you
think is happening.
Even blue sky. Hey. Blue sky is gonna
censor too. Good job, guys.
I this one just was over the top
for me.
Anna Paulina Luna shared this.
I mean, this is actually insulting to Charlie's
memory.
What what I mean, this is a picture
of Jesus Christ,
Martin Luther King Junior,
JFK, and Abraham Lincoln with Charlie Kirk.
Simply says, all because of words.
So now you're comparing Charlie Kirk to Jesus
Christ?
I mean, do they have any limits, guys?
How shameless these people are. I mean, that's
insulting. Like, so now you're pushing people into
how, like, lionizing them to the level that
is almost that no that most people think
is a little bit over the top. But
they're gonna do it anyway because they don't
want insulting, so all you're doing is manipulating
this.
And all because of words? Do we even
know what happened yet? He posted this on
the eleventh.
As Michael writes, do Americans not realize how
completely mental their country is? From the outside,
it's like watching the fall of Rome.
I hope we can think about that. Now
I hope Michael can also realize, though, there's
a lot of Americans that are not being
represented in what they're shown.
Maybe the majority.
But I think we need to think about
this, guys. The world's looking at us like
we're collapsing right now.
Versha,
Shaikh says, Charlie Kirk supporters.
He was the defender of free speech. That's
been a big call. Also, Charlie Kirk supporters.
Docs them. Cancel them. Get their addresses. Fire
them. How dare they hold those opinions about
him? Exactly.
Here's Laura Lohmer.
This guy happens to know where the shooter
was and is looking back, cheering him on,
lifeless body. Okay. Worth looking into if he
was somehow involved with the shooting. Right? Laura
Loomer says, we need to start arresting people
for glorifying
political violence.
See, this is where her moment her fate
where she's directing. So this is she had
every opportunity to point at this and say,
look, investigate this. He may know something, but
she's so focused on her tunnel vision or
whoever's driving to driving her to post what
she's driving.
We need to start arresting people for glorifying
violence,
which is not even the real point to
make on this video. But she is, again,
trying to drive the direction of censorship, of
political suppression, of you having an opinion about
something and being shut down because Laura Loomer
doesn't like it.
Betty Johnson, following Charlie Kirk's assassination, representative Anna
Anna Paulina Luna, which seems to be really
driving a lot of this right now, announces
legislation
to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization.
We're again, most of us are aware that
there's very clear manipulation of that platform through
FBI and others, but it's not even about
the group, guys, especially if you realize what
that is. It's about using this to make
the to set the precedent.
That becomes that Antifa becomes anything they look.
Right now, they're saying people using the word
fascist without even proving that they're part of
a group are Antifa.
Next thing you know, I'm Antifa because I
say Trump's a fascist. That's how dumb this
gets. We've seen it with immigration.
So they're creating something, which hopefully doesn't pass
because it would be unconstitutional.
Well, I mean, I I get well, in
the sense of where it would go. I
guess the point of the legislation
is just the idea of declaring this group
a terrorist organization. It's like saying trend trend
trend trend trend trend trend trend trend trend
trend is a terrorist This is about creating
the justification to demonize a group that you
don't like. That becomes left, and it becomes
whoever they want, which is always the point.
These people are anti American at the core
point at the at the core of this.
She's I have legislation that would currently ban
Antifa or categorize Antifa as a terrorist organization,
specifically a leftist ideology that has been calling
people like us Nazis fascist because you are
fascist by the way, not Nazis. That's stupid.
You believe you clearly are driving an agenda
that is, by definition, both of those are
rather
authoritarian and fascist. So did Biden, so did
Bush, so did Obama.
But now you're saying we can't say what
it is. It's sort of like saying you're
not allowed to say what the COVID shot
was. Same point, different conversation.
They're rejecting Christianity. They reject the concept of
nationalism.
Those are opinions.
You morons.
Now you have to be Christian? I mean,
what is wrong with these people? This is
alarming where this is going.
She also says, in the wake of well,
this is the report. In the wake of
his assassination, she also announces legislation making politically
motivated attacks. So think hate speech, not just
a crime, but it's a hate speech cry.
Hate crime. Right?
A civil rights violation, ensuring offenders face the
full weight of the law. Right. So now
we're gonna make it extra bad because we've
put a lens over it.
So when they say this person was a
hate crime, well, what it means is they
committed a crime and that we argue they
had hate in their minds when they did
it. That's not subjective at all. Right? Now
some cases, it's kinda easy to prove, but
it always is ridiculous to me because it
should be about the crime, not about what
you think is the intent when it is
often manipulated. Same thing here. You're gonna simply
make it up to the idea to be
they wanted you know, it was a lefty,
so they it was politically motivated. There were
or the word terrorist,
which gets applied to things all over the
world, which are not even close to that,
like you're in Nicaragua. It's used for those
very reasons.
Because all this is showing you in a
large sense is all of these tools coming
home
aimed at you,
which is what we've been telling you for
years.
Mark, senator Marsha Blackburn.
As our nation mourned the devastating loss of
Charlie Kirk, a rogue sacred service agent posted
on Facebook suggesting that he deserved to be
murdered.
And what it is is some, you know,
that he caught brought this on himself, things
like that. I'm calling for this agent's immediate
termination. Right? Because how dare you have your
own opinion about somebody who's not in the
government.
I mean, think about this, guys. This is
Charlie it's a person in any it's like
saying, like, okay. Let me let me say
think about this.
If this person came out and said
just let's just say Joe Biden had died,
and he came out and said, Joe,
Joe Biden brought it on himself. Do you
think Marshall Black were gonna be saying this?
You damn well know that wouldn't happen. Or
if how about it was just a a
left wing commentator? How about,
Rachel Maddow? And he said, she brought it
on herself with all of her leftist ideology.
Do you think that they would care?
Is that not the exact same thing? Right?
The adults in the room can say like,
you can see it, guys. Those are the
same thing. But you know as well as
I that any one of these right wing
people saying
that they brought it on themselves because of
the lunatic ideology
is something that happens every time. And that's
acceptable because, well, they're actually crazy. But he's
saying the same thing about a
Kirk character on the right, the equal equivalent
to the left and the same thing, but
on the right, who is spouting things, it's
the same point with the immigration and the
division policies. It's the same stuff.
Now I'm not saying I think that on
either side of it, but the point is
it's the same point and, if saying it
on one side is somehow the biggest crime
in the world, over here, well, it's just
justified.
Define Elle says Liberals loses it at TikTok
after reportedly getting fired from her job or
his job for celebrating Charlie Kirk assassination.
Celebrating Charlie's murder is good. Losing a job,
devastating. Tell point is
they're cheering on people losing their jobs for
making a joke.
So yeah. So you're the left. Right? So
you are the left. So Defiant l should
make a post about himself. You are the
very thing you guys have been so gleefully
making fun of your entire careers. You're doing
the same thing, and that should be embarrassing
as hell for you.
Oh, and then don't the point, Gunther Eagleman
deleted the tweet that that was about because
I think he was getting pushed back for
being a hypocrite.
Military support points out this guy got fired.
He posts he post he posted this. Another
racist man popped.
Okay.
You could argue that's insulting. You could argue
you disagree.
Plenty of people think he's racist,
and he got shot.
So tell me why this is somebody that
gets fired from their job.
He is a military recruit officer
who said something about Charlie Kirk
and he gets fired from his job.
Does that need I mean, does does that
make sense to anybody?
Is this not free speech? I mean, what
are we talking about? Because they are
losing their minds about this.
And this is left and right is the
same thing. Right now, the right's in control
and they are showing you that they are
exactly the same as the left.
This is crazy to me, guys. I'm actually
surprised that this isn't I mean,
right now,
I can't believe that there's not, like, Elon
Musk and so on. Like, remember the craziness
that came around with Elon Musk claiming his
jet was doxxed even though it wasn't? It
was public information? Check this out. Charlie's murderers
is what it says with a v. A
searchable database of over 20,000
individuals celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder, which by the
way is free speech and within their rights,
will soon be available on our website.
It says it will be searchable
by location,
employer,
industry
type. Political violence could never be the answer.
Oh, wait. So doxing then. So so I
guess doxing in this case is okay. Nothing
hypocritical about that. Right, guys? Two party illusion.
Seriously.
Somebody tag Elon Musk. I'm willing to bet
you that never goes away.
Here is
Eagle or I oh, it's Gunther Eagleman. Expose
all of them.
What I said was, you're a hypocrite. I
did. I I tweeted it and said, this
is what a hypocrite looks like.
Here is Mago's voice. 1,000,000 followers.
Let's go. This is perfect.
Can you even imagine these children screaming if
the same thing was done about Republicans?
It's
just embarrassing.
Here is Alex Jones. Of course.
Good job.
And I said, this is what a hypocrite
looks like. Doxxing is good when we do
it.
Now,
the obvious direction that this is going to
lead in, I can promise you that. A
living woman says, yes, it's tragic and sad
if Charlie was randomly killed, which he was.
This is before that. It's on the tenth
in Utah today. But face it, we'll never
know the truth behind this. I sadly think
that's probably where it's gonna go. Even more
tragic will be the government's knee jerk remedy
to prevent, both in quotes, future similar occurrences
That all of us will suffer for losing
more freedom.
I agree.
Again,
today,
Hegseth says the Pentagon tracking service members, civilians,
who celebrate Charlie Kirk's murder.
Good times.
Remember when we just talked about this, the
Gideon clip?
Right? We we just did an entire show
on this. The US's new Israeli made AI
precrime system.
So this is him on this is from
August 29, where this guy came on and
literally talked about this on Fox News and
said, Israel grade ontology,
which by the way is what me Steve
brought up for me. I didn't I didn't
actually pick up on this when I first
saw it. It means the branch of metaphysics
dealing with the nature of being.
The nature of being. So he's saying that
this precrime AI surveillance system was built with
Israeli grade nature of being. Like, I like,
present or, like, in,
the word speaks for itself, but it's like,
the idea is, like, inherently, like, Israeli,
which is just crazy to say what we're
talking about. And over overall overall
is talking about surveilling Americans
with a system that can say you're about
to commit a crime.
And after that last shooting, which by the
way was full of all sorts of weird
things,
he was it was within
less than a day. He was on there
saying we have,
what was it? 12 agencies,
almost 3,000 people. It would for anyone with
a brain was like, okay. That was already
in place.
There's no way that much could have happened
with multiple administer multiple agencies.
So an AI this and this guy is
a is is is military,
Israeli veteran, which means same thing as always,
built by Israel, an a car an AI
precrime system
that's gonna be surveilling Americans on top of
the Palantir thing, which I think is really
one and the same when it comes down
to it.
And he was pushing it in then. And
now, he's back on the news doing it
again.
Oh, wait. Did I really close that on
accident?
That's frustrating.
I you know, I thought I did it
earlier. The simple point is, which you guys
might have seen, he's out he went on
new then recently after the shooting took place
and talked about Charlie Kirk and simply made
the point that should this be in place,
we would have had more information about it
before it happened.
Pushing in this idea. You're seeing calls for
this all over all over.
You know, precrime, AI, whatever, that we would
have known, we could have stopped it as
you might expect.
This is where I think this is going,
at least in one part. We already see
the censorship. We already see the reactions of
it. We already see more government infiltration, which
I think is happening constantly. We're distracted by
everything else.
And just a thought says, don't you see
how easy it will be
to use the police state against people if
we continue this way?
They'll mark someone a terrorist for saying the
wrong thing or posting the wrong thing or
thinking the wrong thing, and the crowd will
cheer.
Stop and think.
I really would love to believe that most
people are on this page and that we're
being led by a large group of manipulative
people that pretend to the majority.
Because I don't mean, I don't even know
how to make sense of the reverse. How
you fight that? But I genuinely believe that
that's the we're that we are in the
former. I mean, just because plenty that I've
said points throughout all sorts of agendas that
show that. It breaks through.
And this person says, the American people are
being set up for a race political ideology
war. See, a lot of people see this,
guys, that will have people begging for increased
surveillance, digital IDs, for safety, security by a
mandatory AI monitor database.
Don't fall for the trap. We stand united.
Don't fall for the trap.
Now this was weird, by the way. Most
people don't even hear about this. On September
11, there was another shooting
at a naval academy.
I found that very strange.
And he got just very little attention. I
don't think anyone was killed, probably why that
and I didn't didn't get as much. This
person this is why I showed it. This
person says, Trump needs to call in the
National Guard now.
And there you go. Whether, you know, bot,
somebody means it, it's just this is where
it's going. More rationale. Now guess what?
There had been a very clear hold from
the the DC nationalization of police, the rollout
under the guise of fighting all crime. That
only happened to DC. They have 19 states
with national guard rolled out under the guise
of immigration helping ICE, which really I think
was one and the same. Right? But because
of the DC
move that then opened that door, then a
national guard was just flooded, I think. And
that's my point is, today,
after this shooting, we saw the next step.
And I've always been telling you that the
DC point to move that into other states
under the guise of fighting all crime and,
like, cleaning up the cities as opposed to
the ice point was gonna be a very
different conversation when it was outside of DC.
And now it's happening in Memphis, which is
weird to me because Memphis is not even
remotely close to the level
of a crime that they're pointing to. They
made it up about Washington, DC. I'm sure
it'll be the same thing here. Trump says
he'll send National Guard to Memphis,
escalating his use of troops in US cities.
This is this is National Guard to clean
up the city.
It's going to continue to escalate. I'm gonna
dig into this in the next show and
the reality of this, the illegality
of it, and where this will continue to
lead. But I just need I think we
need to recognize
why this is happening on September 12 and
why all of these things are driving us
into the direction of accepting these changes.
Now couple of last points on
the FBI before we finish on the segment
of Israel and how much this all brings
it
together. Cash Patel questions grow as it's revealed
he gutted Utah FBI leadership before Charlie Kirk
assassination.
Found that very interesting.
Could just be additional. You know? This they
are going after liberals and women and whatever,
which just seems like largely what happened.
But
Kash Patel, the rest of them, I mean,
I've seen very, very clear Israeli Mossad overlaps
with both these people and pretty much the
entire cabinet of Trump.
And that just could very well mean that
they've been influenced or, like, blackmailed or whatever.
You can decide for yourself. My point is
to consider that possibility and ask yourself whether
this could be more or really just even
the administration
through Trump and others like Thiel and whoever
else involved are controlling the direction and are
also influenced by Israel,
that this might have been something that was
done in order to do something beforehand.
The point was here about the office itself.
It says, Kash Patel fired the she apparently
was known, you know, regarded as some kind
of legendary special agent in charge of Utah's
FBI division,
just a month before what happened with Charlie.
The special agent in charge of Salt Lake
City,
her name was, Metab Said, was which again,
you know, interesting name related to the larger
thing going on today, was pushed out of
the role in August. Because real to be
honest, guys, we've seen many examples of them
going after just of just because of ideology.
That somewhat connected to Palestine, you can't be
in the government. Like, that's the kind red
scare, go off to Japanese World War two.
It's what this country just does, or sadly,
the government does. I hate when I make
that mistake. The country is you.
But it says despite former agents saying that
she was,
absolutely the best in in the bureau.
Said was fired just six months after she
was appointed in February with sources telling NBC
that the reasons for her sacking weren't clear.
Deputy FBI director Dan Bongino reportedly said told
Said that she wasn't a good fit for
the office,
which just means simply we don't like something
about her. Like, if she's known for this
kind of legendary role, which I briefly look
into, it does appear to be the reality.
It's either she's woman, that she's ethnic, that
she is a democrat, or something like that.
That's what that's the sense I get. And
that pretty clearly what generally was going on.
It says officials also released images of a
person of interest being sought in the ongoing
manhunt seen wearing a black t shirt or
the bald eagle flying shirt. The shirt read
land of three. I just think I
grabbed that in the beginning. So my point
so I the whole one more thing. It
says in a woodland in woodland near in
a woodland
woodland, that's where we read it right there,
near the shooting, a cops recovered the 30
caliber bolt action rifle. This is more information
we've heard in those clips.
Let's see. I think that was it. So
the point was
that he removed this person before this happened.
And in this office, in the place took
place. Just consideration, data point. Right? And whether
or not this could have an effect on
some the new person, you know like, again,
let's say, hypothetically, it was in conjunction with
a foreign entity, and this person was put
in that place that then was ready to
to accept that and could you know, that
that's the way you should look at it
if it's possible or if it's, you know,
if it ends up being more relevant as
it goes forward.
Ex Trump's ex FBI chief floored by Cash
Patel's Charlie Kirk investigation.
I find this interesting because it makes perfect
sense regardless of the other side of it.
Right? Then you could argue that it's in
in their interest to, you know, look down
on what they're doing and how they do
it. But it makes when you when you
hear this, it makes perfect sense to me.
It says the FBI's deputy director in the
first Trump administration well, and, you know, from
the first Trump administration, but currently not part
of it, so they'll frame it as the
other side. McCabe said he was left dumbfounded
by the decision of the bureau's current leader,
current leader Kash Patel, to visit Utah as
authorities hunt for Charlie Kirk. He says there
are many good reasons why you wouldn't go
as the director
out on the scene to an ongoing post
crisis investigation.
One of the reasons not to do so
is that because the presence of the director
imposes a huge burden on the field office.
There's all kinds of arrangements that have to
be made. There's all kinds of security concerns
that arise. So all it does is add
extra burden and why they're supposed to be
focusing on the investigation. And And it says
transportation becomes very complicated. And that's the last
thing you wanna do in a field office
while they're in the middle of investigation in
a critical incident. So, again, it's strange to
go out there under these circumstances. You know
why I think? Because he thinks he's supposed
to. Because he thinks he wants to go
out there and put his face in front
of it and be like, I'm here doing
this, and that's what they do. That's why
he went there and stood there like a
child while the report was being given and
didn't even say anything, which also feels strange.
Patel visited Utah on Thursday and attended the
press conference where law enforcement gave an update
and didn't speak the entire time.
Posting misleading updates on social media by telling
his 1,800,000
followers that officials, this is Kash Patel,
had apprehended the subject of the shooting
before later declaring that the individual had nothing
to do with the attack. Does this not
show you that Patch Patel feels like he's
not even involved?
This guy is supposed to be the director
of the FBI, and he told you that
they got the guy before they even knew.
And then they let him out. He's he's,
like, responding to reports on Twitter like we
all are, or he was trying to lie
to you.
It's not hard to see that. It says
McCabe also questioned why Patel did not speak.
This feels weird, the whole thing.
So this is a part that I think
people will be interested in more than anything,
and I think it is very relevant.
So first, I'll start with
two very quick clips by James Lee that
I just think set the table pretty well,
and I think it's interesting the way that
he covered this. So first,
he came out with a video on the
eleventh that says did did Israel order the
hit on Charlie Kirk. Here's what he says.
It's way too soon to even talk about
something like this, but I think the American
public deserves to know the truth
about what happened to Charlie Kirk. This is
a source that I trust very much, and
this is coming from the top levels of
government. And they were having dinner with people,
senators in the Senate Foreign Intelligence Committee. They
are not openly saying this at this point.
Of course not. But in private conversation, they're
saying, hey, this looks like potentially Israel is
behind this. Wow. And then in terms of
That's a completely hit you know, as always,
that could be somebody misleading him. I'm only
playing this to set this for you'll see
why, but it is make recognize that anything
with him or somebody else consider it because
it could be real, but also recognize that
you can't prove it, then you can't prove
it. Getting to the actual evidence itself, a
very close friend of Charlie Kirk's put put
out there. Charlie didn't wanna put out the
sweep itself, but he told a friend to
put it out in the Internet and said,
hey, if I go against Israel, I think
they will kill me. And when when did
he say this? This was August 13. So
less than a month ago. I can see
Charlie over the last few months sort of
taking new information
and have his mind shift a little bit.
Right? He used to be an Israeli loyalist.
Then he starts to sort of mildly criticize
Israel in that, hey. I don't think, you
know, we shouldn't be allowed as an American
to question the acts of a foreign government.
I have text messages, Meghan, calling me an
anti Semite. I have less
ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government
about backlash than actual Israelis do. Mhmm. And
that's really, really weird. Isn't it, Meghan? And
he publicly said, hey. Maybe
Epstein was Mossad. He certainly had a lot
of connections to
Israeli ex prime ministers. And there's also this
clip where he questions
how October 7 happened. Was there a stand
down order?
Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the
side of New Jersey.
When I took a helicopter ride
from Jerusalem
to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes.
Six hours. Now, my honest sense of this
is like, before all this, I would have
and I still argue it probably makes the
most sense that this is him, you know,
doing what I talk about a lot of
them doing, which is sort of, you know,
still supporting Israel, but making it seem as
if you see the things to gain people's
support.
Now but with all that I've seen, the
couple of videos will play next and and
and what happened,
it just adds more to the story. And
it does genuinely seem as if whether because
it was opportunism or not. That's what I
keep talking about. Right? Even people like this
recognize the opportunity. When you see, like, I'm
showing you and that I clearly see that
the vast majority of the of anybody watching
independent media, anybody watching media, in vast majority
of this country
recognizes Israel's involvement in everything that's happening in
the world in regard to the genocide and
a lot of this country.
Then he recognizes that the massive
like, that means your your audience
is against you when it comes to the
side you're taking in most of these cases.
So eventually, you re realize it's more in
my interest to start calling this thing out
because I'm gonna get so much support even
though I'm gonna get attacked from Israel.
Not considering that at least to this point,
if that's what happened, but just that's you
understand why that might happen. But so I'm
just giving you the two sides of this.
If before all this, that's probably what I
would have considered. But now which I'll play
the next ones. I think that there is,
you know, it's more there's more indication that
he might have actually either been doing it
for opportunism or actually changed his mind.
Their livestreaming the killing of Jews
was that somebody in the government say stand
down. Down. That is a legitimate
non
conspiracy question.
I mean, this is a big problem for
Israel. Charlie Kirk was maybe the most influential
figure on the right, especially with people under
the age of 30. Mhmm. And when you
start to have somebody
that influential
With the group, by the way, which was,
like, the core issue for the ADL, there
was the and the core issue for, like,
the, like, the basically, think of it like
this. The battle for Israel's,
the where like,
it's the Israel influence and support was being
waged on that age group.
That's very important to think about. And Charlie
seems to have been, like, the most influential
around that group and might have been changing
sides.
As a conservative to say, hey, we need
to maybe reassess this relationship. There's something weird
going on. This is a warning to people
in the media to say, hey, you need
to stop this right now because you could
be next.
So next one is just his follow-up to
it, which I I found funny. Here's how
he framed it. He says retraction.
It was not Israel that killed Charlie Kirk.
No more questions, please.
Take a second to issue a retraction
in regards to the alleged killer of Charlie
Kirk. We are being told that it was
not an Israeli conspiracy.
It was, according to the FBI, the act
of a lone gunman named Tyler Robinson, a
deranged lone gunman who just happened to have
not one, but two Patsy's in the crowd.
We are also now being told that it
was his father, Matt Robinson,
now hailed as the father of justice,
who turned his son into the authorities. In
a press conference shortly thereafter, FBI director, Kash
Patel, proudly announced that the suspect was apprehended
in record time, quote, in less than thirty
six hours, 33 to be precise. According to
CNN, a family member told investigators that Robinson
had, quote, become more political in recent years
and that the authorities had also discovered anti
fascist messages
engraved on the ammunition.
Prime minister Netanyahu went on Fox News, though,
to claim that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by
a combination of, quote, radical Islamist and ultra
progressives.
Now ask yourself why they just clumsily inserted
the trans part to the what was on
the guns.
That I guarantee you that comes from the
administration or some kind of political effort. Now
in terms of the murder weapon, the FBI
stated that they found the shooter's rifle in
the woods fully assembled. And here is Robinson
caught on CCTV footage making that getaway from
the rooftop
with said rifle.
Yes. People have been telling me that the
barrel can be disassembled in seconds, which he
then put back together in the woods to
hide it from authorities. So, yeah, that's it.
We got him. Now
no more questions, please.
Obviously, he doesn't buy the official story.
But
in you know,
ultimately,
it's not clear.
It's I think it's pretty clear that there's,
like I mean, this is kinda what I
feel like with a lot of these, and
it it frustrates me how consistently that seems
to be the case where I'm I'm I'm
being objective about this. And I'm not if
I see a story that I don't feel
like there's evidence of any kind of manipulation,
I'll say no. I don't see that. If
even though there's always good people that argue,
there's always some but every time these things
happen like this, I mean, we can everyone
can tell. Like, for on the surface level,
it could literally just be that they're
manipulating this because they do that to everything,
whether or not it's something they started or
included or caused because they're just desperate like
that. But my point is that you look
through it all and it's like you end
up going, well, there's so many parts of
the story that seem like they're lying about
or that this is inconsistent or they covered
it up or they censored this off the
Internet. You know? So it's harder to feel
like there's something missing there. And when you
really realize that they've been doing this your
entire life, and I don't mean hypothetically, that
you can prove
from every major story you can look at,
then it's kind of easy to think about
how this works. Now here is somebody who
cracked the case.
Ashton Forbes says, if you were on one
of those people claiming Kirk's death was because
of Israel, I hope you feel shame and
forget some perspective.
You irreparably damaged your cause by showing your
deranged bias. The behavior is no better than
the woke left.
Okay.
And what's the evidence he puts forward to
make this case?
What what Mario wrote out on Twitter, because
that's clearly evidence, right?
It's just this is so ridiculous. Now I'm
not saying we know for sure. I would
make fun of somebody guaranteeing they know just
like I make somebody something like the like,
make fun of somebody like him guaranteeing you
know it's not. But Mario came out doing
what his real job is at the end
of the day. Charlie Kirk was not turning
against Israel. This isn't even about whether they
were involved. This is an effort to try
to say he wasn't turning against him. What
they're saying is, here's what really happened. Charlie
quoted a viral antisemitic post during one of
his shows, then broke it down and condemned
it. But somebody clipped that one piece out
and lied about it. Oh, you mean you
mean other than the 13 other videos we
can show that we'll show three of them
right now? Do these guys not even ever
do due diligence or do they know they're
lying? I don't really understand sometimes.
Because they must know that there are people
like us out here that constantly go, well,
I'm gonna look for myself.
It wasn't one clip that he was quoting,
like, as if he was saying things that
he was saying make like, quoting somebody else
saying them and they clipped it and made
it out to be him.
That clearly happens everywhere.
We'll show you these clips. We just showed
you some. He was clear I'm gonna play
you Candace Owens saying he was going through
a spiritual transition.
They're tell the this is Mario, in my
opinion, doing his job to gaslight.
This guy popped out of nowhere and now
is interviewing head leaders of state or heads
of state. This is ridiculous where we are.
Okay. So let's let's go through this in
earnest. Okay? Here here's an important article that
does a good balanced job of this. They're
very clearly showing you the evidence, but also
showing you how it can be taken out
of context. The gray zone
from today.
Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer,
was, quote, frightened by pro Israel forces before
death, friends reveal.
Clearly relevant. A Trump insider and longtime friend
of the Charlie Kirk tells the gray zone
how the assassinated conservative leaders' turning point on
Israel influence
provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu's allies that
left him angry and afraid.
The source said anxiety spread within Trump administration
after an apparent Israeli spy operation was uncovered.
This is additional not that that happened in
2020 as well or '19. The the stingray
device is on the White House.
I mean, every I mean, I even,
well, I'll get to it. It's in the
article. The point clearly is that there is
constant examples of how Israel does this. And
what we're getting in here is that Charlie
recognized if this is to be taken at
face value. You could question it. We can't
prove it. It's a source.
That Charlie was aware of or became aware
of how problematic Netanyahu and the Zionism effort
was and that they were influencing and sabotaging
Trump. And so it appears his loyalty was
with Trump, which makes sense to me. And
this then
became, I really, shyly see the problem because
it's not America first. It's you're Trump is
being forced to work for another country, and
so that became a problem and he got
threatened for it. Now you you see and
you could see where this goes. So take
it with a grain of salt because we
don't know. But I think you with with
videos we'll play after this and everything else,
you can see that there is some level
of truth to what this was.
Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year
from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
to arrange a massive new
infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point
USA organization,
America's largest conservative youth association,
according to a longtime friend of the slain
commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity.
The source told the Gray Zone that the
late pro Trump influencer believed Netanyahu
was trying to cow him into silence
as he began to publicly question Israel's overwhelming
influence in Washington and demanded more space to
criticize it. Now, because it's an anonymous source,
you have to say that maybe they're lying
to Gray's own and you'd like to believe
that people
a platform would do their due diligence and
check things for themselves, but you never know
for sure. Right? So, the point is you
have to do consider it like you would
anything and use the other evidence to back,
you know, to to weigh it. In this
case,
a lot of this lines up with other
statements, like, we'll get to Harrison from,
Infowars even though it's basically countersignaling what Jones
was saying, saying the same thing, which I
find interesting, especially from Infowars.
So it's very interesting to think about. We're
gonna more to go through on this.
He believed that Netanyahu was trying to cow
him into silence as he began to publicly
question Israel's overwhelming influence in Washington. In the
weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination,
Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader.
Now that's not the same as Israel.
Now this is important different this is an
important nuance to this argument that it's not
he's not possible he was turning against Israel.
Turning against Netanyahu is not the same thing,
and you might be shocked to find out
that a massive, if not majority, of Israel
hates Netanyahu.
In fact, I think it's easy to prove
that the vast majority hate Netanyahu. There's it's
it's in within his party. He's almost been
fired or, like, he's almost been put in
jail and removed from office
many times by people even from his side
of the conversation.
Many times. And he ends up going into
war, bombs Gaza, and then, you know, gets
the support of the of the most radical
and keeps going.
It's not a secret. It's very easy to
to to look into. So when it comes
back to whether or not he was being
suddenly he becomes suddenly aware of what Netanyahu
was doing with Trump,
and Netanyahu's in power and could easily marshal
resources
for his own personal agenda like he does
every day and what people in Israel will
tell you to do something like this, should
he recognize this could be important enough. And
if Charlie is rightly influencing the the demographic
that is the battleground for Israel's influence in
The United States and he was changing sides,
then that might make sense.
Take him out while he can be seen
as a martyr for your cause before he
can start calling you out.
All hypothetical,
worth considering.
It says,
he had come to load the leader,
not necessarily Israel, regarding him as a bully,
the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what
the he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where
Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president's personal
decisions. Well, look at that. Personnel decisions.
I mean, either way and I think that's
even more relevant to what we've been telling
you. He's packing his cabinet with people supporting
Israel. Is that not what we see?
And weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor, Miriam
Adelson, to keep the White House firmly under
its thumb.
According to Kirk's friend, who also enjoyed access
to president Trump and his inner circle, Kirk
strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran
and Israel's behalf. Charlie, quote, Charlie was the
only person who did that, they said. Recalling
out Trump barked at him, that's a quote,
in response to angrily shut down the conversation.
In response and angrily shut down the conversation.
The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk's
mind that the president of The United States
had fallen under the control of a maligned
foreign power
and was leading his own country into a
series of disastrous conflicts.
Very interesting. And you wait. When you see
these next videos, it really comes together that
he was questioning some of these things, like
the willingness of Israel or specifically Netanyahu
to maybe blackmail Trump or, you know, to
get them in these positions. Like, it's interesting.
I mean, because this when you I mean,
you know the coverage we've been going over.
It's I mean, look, I don't wanna make
it about confirmation bias. Clearly, this connects with
what we've been talking about and in other
cases can prove.
But that's why you because we don't have
we have to question it. But it's in
thinking about what we've already proven on this
show. This is just confirmation. But again, that's
why because it's so easy to accept, we
have to make sure we're more critical of
it than ever.
It says,
according to Kirk's friend, who also enjoyed access
to Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly
warned Trump last June. Oh, I just read
that.
Where were we? I thought that was the
one above it.
Right. Okay. By the following month, Kirk had
become the target of a sustained private campaign,
which he actually spoke about. We that clip
was just played for you. A sustained private
campaign of intimidation
and free flowing fury by wealthy and powerful
allies of Netanyahu. Zionist online attacking him for
letting Tucker Carlson speak about what on stage
about Epstein being a Mossad agent or about
Israel. Remember how crazy that got for a
second? And that's why Kirk started getting attacked.
He's turning port USA. He was the one
that set that stage up, him and Megyn
Kelly. And they got heat for allowing those
people to speak. David Smith.
And you it's it's easy to see how
this connects right now. Not to prove it,
but that it it connects. It makes sense.
And it's his figures he described in an
interview that we just played for you as
Jewish leaders and stakeholders. Actually, I don't think
that was in that clip, but that's the
same discussion.
Quote, he was afraid of them, the source
emphasized.
It says in in this July and as
always, read the whole article. There's plenty more
in here that you'll wanna hear. This July,
at his Turning Point USA Student Action Summit,
Kirk provided a forum for the right wing
grassroots to vent its fury about Israel's political
hammerlock on the Trump administration.
These speakers from,
former Fox News stalwart, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly,
to the anti Zionist Jewish comedian, Dave Smith,
denounced Israel's blood soaked assault on the besieged
Gaza Strip, branded Jeffrey Epstein as an Israeli
intelligence asset, which is the truth, and openly
taunted Zionist billionaires like Bill Ackman for getting
away with scams despite having no actual skills.
To be clear, yep Epstein's on the record
as being an FBI informant. I think there's
obvious CIA and Assad connections.
But there's the clip. You wanna watch it.
Tuck Carlson on on Turning Point USA stage.
Following the confab, Kirk was bombarded with infuriated
text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu's wealthiest
allies in The United States, including many who
had funded Turning Point USA. So you see,
this started with the, allegedly,
the
desire to
massively fund Turning Point that looks like it
was turned down. Then this now so now
clearly, there's resentment if if this is accurate,
as I would see it anyway. And it
says, according to his longtime friend, the Zionist
donor treated Kirk with outright contempt,
essentially ordering him to fall back into line.
Quote, he was being told what you're not
allowed to do. Doesn't this sound like exactly
what we're seeing right now? And it was
driving him crazy. Kirk's friend recalled, the conservative
youth leader was not only alienated by the
hostile nature of the
interactions, but frightened by the backlash.
Quote, I think in the end, Charlie was
going through a spiritual transition. I'll play that
clip for you. That's Candace Owens.
She continued, they wanted him to lose everything
for changing or slight even slightly modifying an
opinion.
It's very hurtful to me. How do you
reconcile? How do you so Candace Owens is
still saying this, guys. You can't make this
up. I mean, obviously, you can, but I
mean, in the sense that so she's still
saying it over here. So either she's continuing
to lie, which you can consider, but she's
also a republican. She's also very influential
with this entire discussion.
It just it speaks to exactly what is
going on and whether or not this is
them that did this, that this is the
reality of what he was existing in. And
that clearly he was beginning to become uncomfortable
with this kind of influence whether or not
he was pro Israel
or maybe just pro America Christian right, and
he thought that he was supposed to support
Israel. We know how that can manipulate people.
He went on to complain to Kelly, I
have less ability, this is what you heard,
to criticize the Israeli government than actual Israelis
do. And that's really, really weird. It sure
is.
He had this interview with
Ben Shapiro, who the entire time was looking
at him like he was
committing a holocaust. And, ultimately,
this is something that will play for you
as well, but it just clearly shows you
this building change.
According to Kirk's long time friend, Kirk's resentment
of Netanyahu and the Israel lobby was spreading
within Trump's inner circle.
That's important. In fact, they said the president
himself was terrified of Netanyahu's wrath and feared
the consequences of defying him. During the past
year, the Trump insider was told by contacts
in the White House that the secret service
had caught Israeli government personnel placing electronic devices
on its emergency response vehicles on two separate
occasions.
And and and if that's the truth, and
they didn't care or they just didn't do
anything about it, that show that proves everything
to me. And we know for a fact
that it happened in the first time. It
was very casually reported and it went nowhere.
Stingray devices from Israel found in the White
House, 02/2019,
I believe. Indeed, it says according to a
report in Politico,
also in my eye, citing three former senior
US officials. This is the one I was
referencing. Yeah. Okay. That's there's the date right
there. A cell phone spying device was placed
by Israeli agents near the White House and
other sensitive locations around Washington toward the end
of Trump's first term 02/2019.
For and this is something we covered when
it happened. Former UK prime minister Boris Johnson
recounted a similar incident in his memoir,
writing that his security team found a listening
device in his bathroom
soon after Netanyahu used his personal toilet.
Guys, how do we possibly miss all of
this stuff?
I mean, I'm talking like I mean, not
again, the parts of this I'll make the
point again at the end about questioning this,
but these are things that we've discussed that
Boris can lie about that. Sure. But so
many of these points are so consistent, and
so many John Kirchow, for example, will tell
you horrifying stories about what Israel did to
them when he was in in the agency.
You know, the former CIA, but nonetheless, same
point.
It says, there is currently no evidence of
an Israeli government role in Kirk's assassination. So
this is what Gray Grayzone is writing. And
I I mean, I I would push back
on that. There's no evidence.
Certainly no proof. But it says, however, that
has not stopped thousands of social media users
from speculating that the pro Trump operative's shifting
views on the issue contributed just in some
way to his death. By the time of
publication,
over a 100,000 Twitter users
have liked a September 11 post by libertarian
influencer, Ian Carroll, declaring about Kirk. And this
is the k same point they made before.
Quote, he was their friend. He basically dedicated
his life to them, and they murdered him
in front of his family. Israel just shot
themselves.
You know, that's my problem. Like, even if
you agree that's likely the case, that's so
you don't know that. You don't know that
as a fact. And look, you have the
right to say what you want, which is
probably what it is. I was just I
was just trying to make a point or
whatever. It's free speech.
But with that much influence, you know, people
take this at face value today. That's that's
their responsibility. Right? That's their choice. But I
just you know, I guess it's responsibility. Again,
people can do what they want. You have
the right to say that. But
I wouldn't I I that's not something you'll
ever have me say if I can't prove
that.
Many advancing the unsubstantiated
theory have pointed to a Twitter ex post
by Harrison Smith. A personality at the pro
Trump Infowars network stating on August 13, almost
a month before Kirk's assassination,
which is really relevant, that he was told
by someone close to Kirk that he was
Kirk thinks Israel will kill him if he
turns against Israel.
Oh, I thought they had I I had
it up here. Hold on. It was,
right here. And I I you know what?
I I should've grabbed that. I I could
grab grab real quickly while watching a video.
I'll I'll I'll do that when we're searching.
But so this was
August 13.
I'm not gonna name names, but I was
told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that
Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he
turns against them.
I
mean, you know, this is just an August.
Where were we? Oh, it's right here. Hold
on.
So what I like about this I mean,
obviously, so what you remember, gray zone is
citing an in a source
that is tell is, within the Trump administration
that's telling him all of this. So that
could be a lie, obviously.
I don't know why that would be an
interest of Trump's administration to push this lie,
but either way, it's obviously possible.
And then on top of that, they're pointing
to the Harrison point, and how everyone is
speculating. So it's like, I I I appreciate
that they're pointing this out, but their very
article is is giving you information that suggests
that's likely, but not proven. That's important.
And it says, four days before the assassination,
frustration among pro Israel commentators bubbled over
in public during a Fox News interview in
which Ben Shapiro launched a chilling attack on
Kirk
without naming him. This is after the turning
point thing with tucker Carlson and Megan, and
he called him out. So did Laura Loomer,
so did a lot of them. He was
suddenly the bad guy.
Until now suddenly they're cheering his name because
they all, this is how disgusting this gets
in this political game.
But he said, he said, quote, the problem
of the big tent
is that you may end up with many
clowns inside, Shapiro said.
And he said and this is speaking with
Zionist gatekeeper Mark Levin. And he says, quote,
just because you're saying somebody votes Republican, that
doesn't mean they ought to be in the
preacher at the front of the church. They're
not the person that ought to be leading
the movement. If they are spending all day
criticizing the president of The United States as
covering up a Mossad rape ring or being
a tool of the Israelis for hitting a
new Iran nuclear facility, he's talking about Kirk.
When Kirk took his usual place at the
front of the church four days later,
he was cut down by a sniper bullet.
Within twenty four hours of Kirk's death, Shapiro
announced that he would be launching his own
campus speaking tour, vowing we're gonna pick up
that blood stained microphone where Charlie left off.
Now a lot of people seem to be,
at least as far as I could tell,
inaccurately reporting that
that Shapiro's gonna be taking over Turning Point
USA.
Based on the evidence I can see, that
does not seem to be accurate, but maybe
they know something I don't, that it's happening.
But that's all I've seen him say. And
people seem to be conflating that with he's
taking over Turning Point. But if he did,
with what we heard at the beginning about
funding Turning Point from Zionists,
that would be very relevant. Now that's why
I made sure to look into that. Because
if that was the case right now and
I could prove it, that's what I would
be saying. It'd be like, wow, Look at
how this came around.
But we have to wait and see because
I can't prove that right now. But the
very fact that Ben Shapiro seems to be
saying I'm gonna pick up his microphone and
carry this forward,
same thing at the end of the day
in my opinion, and that's very relevant.
So remember that he attacked him and is
and and also suddenly is now, you know,
carrying on his memory.
Seems very disingenuous.
And overall,
we could see
how all of this comes together in a
pretty clear suggestion, not evidence. Now that's the
point, not proof.
Because this is so easy to absorb and
very much aligned with us, you could ask
yourself whether you're being fed what you want.
That's you just have to be objective about
that. Right? So until you can prove, you
have to keep it up in you know,
that I make this point every time we
have these conversations.
Proof is what is what ultimately matters. Now
here's Candace Owens. As Daniel McAdams says, extremely
important. It's slightly sped up by whoever posted
it.
We're wrong, and we laughed at how wrong
it was when people thought that when I
had made up my mind about Israel that
Charlie and me fell apart. Oh, never. Not
for a second. I said, it's the easiest
decision ever because Charlie knew who I was,
and I knew who he was. I said,
Charlie,
this is this is where I'm at, and
there's no room for movement. And you tell
your whoever that needs to hear it, whatever
you need to tell them because we're always
gonna be brothers and sisters, you know? We're
always gonna be brothers and sisters. And we
would talk about things and debate things, behind
the scenes. And I think my perspective was
as it's been throughout our relationship. You might,
you might not get it now, Charlie, but
you will. Only a few years old few
years older than you, but, I think you're
gonna you're gonna see things my way end.
I think,
in the end, Charlie
was going through a spiritual transformation. I don't
think it. I know it. He was going
through a lot, and there was a lot
of pressure. That's obviously a very loaded term
when you're talking about a Christian Zionist kind
of, you know,
spiritual transition or transformation.
I mean, that's that's what they're I mean,
and you go on you can read the
larger conversation in different, you know, their different
reports. It's pretty clear that from a lot
of different angles, it's that people at least
had the impression that he was somewhat changing
his opinion.
Yeah. Yeah. And then don't forget what we
started with. Mario Notfall setting this ridiculous narrative
that, so they lie and they clip this
one thing out. Well, I'm I've got three
more videos to show you. And his closest
people are telling him, you know,
that alone to me stands out from my
personal view more than anything.
That's not proof, but to me, why would
that happen? Why would somebody put him why
would he just make up things? So somebody
to me is driving that conversation,
giving him some false impression or he's making
it up himself to drive in the narrative
that that's not true and it's all a
big lie, even though it's
not. I mean, in the sense that he
clearly was shifting in some cases, or at
least there's plenty more evidence than what they're
claiming is all we're pointing to.
That speaks a lot to me. And it's
hard for me to watch the people who
were pressuring him,
I don't know, just say the things that
they're saying. You know, I just there's something
about it that just feels really fake. It
feels really fake to me. And, they would
have allowed him to lose and wanted him
to lose everything
for changing or even slightly modifying an opinion,
and then to see them doing what they're
doing today is terrible to me. It's very
hurtful to me. But I don't want today
to be about anything other than you guys
knowing that Charlie really was an amazing person.
You know, he was like
we were really close, and he was he
was my best friend and my brother.
And
I will
never
unsee the footage of what I saw.
So here's oh, how did that happen?
I've got it anyway, but here so here's
a clip of Ben Shapiro. Right? So the
important parts on this that from that clip
is, you know, are the reality that she's
telling you he was transitioning spiritually into something
new, that they were attacking him. You know,
it backs up everything else we're talking about.
So here's the one that a lot of
people argue was like the one. It just
you know, everyone's got their opinion, but here's
the one where he's talking to Ben Shapiro.
And even just the way that he sets
this up, you know, it speaks for itself.
We we push back against the media on
COVID, on lockdowns, on
Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe
we should also ask a question. Is the
media totally presenting the truth when it comes
to Israel? Just a question, you know, that
maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says
because
You see. So that's when his eyebrows went
up like that. So that's what I'm sorry.
That's the big picture for this TikTok video.
But I mean
so when you say maybe we should should
we shouldn't I mean, no. Listen to it
again.
You know, that maybe media totally present we
should also ask a question. Is the media
totally presenting the truth when it comes to
Israel?
So So asking the question, is the media
presenting the total truth when it comes to
Israel? Well, wait. That's a
spectacularly
obvious no. It's, like, it's embarrassing to pretend
otherwise. And he rate he would? Like, we
shouldn't question the media, like, the very media
that you call out in every other content,
kind of, or every other context.
So the what he's really doing that to
is is real. That's what he's doing. Ben
Shapiro is a deceptive manipulator
in a lot of ways, but especially when
it comes to Israel. I mean, it's just
I have learned that very clearly, especially since
October 7. Real, just a question, you know,
that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media
says because
I know I've been conditioned to ask a
lot more critical questions over the last couple
of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse
Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people
in the Israeli government are saying again, it's
all over the place. Right? You have opinions
all over.
In your opinion, what would a good outcome
five years from now be, and how does
one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing?
Yeah.
Clearly, that you know, that's
obviously a little bit more specific. Right? Ethnic
cleansing.
You know? I mean, you could argue, like
I said, that maybe he was just doing
that to give let people think that or,
you know, but either way,
having him open that door
for the conversation and allowing others to think,
oh, okay. Well, maybe there is no that
is massive
for
the information war and his gam his demographic,
his gigantic audience at the top of the
paradigm
was
the
battleground. Like, whether you think this is what
happened or not, you know as well as
I, this very clearly makes sense. It adds
up. But just because it adds up doesn't
mean that it's what happened. But here's another
example of the shameless people. Here's Laura Loomer.
Here's what she said on the tenth. It's
time for the Trump administration to shut down
all the leftist organizations. We read it earlier.
If Charlie Kirk dies from his injuries, his
life can't be in vain.
Okay. Using him.
Here's what she said
before that. And this was the same thing
because turning point. I don't ever want her
to hear Charlie Kirk claiming he's pro Trump
ever again.
After this weekend, I'd say he's revealed himself
as political opportunist, and I have had a
front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics
these last ten years. Ten years.
Suddenly, he's the best thing ever. Right? That
these people are disgusting. Lately, Charlie has decided
to behave like a charlatan, claiming to be
pro Trump one day, and he stabs him
in the back the next. Why? Because he's
asking questions? Yes. That's really why.
Turning Point USA was only able to thrive
thanks to the generosity of Trump. So the
moment you start going against the party, yes,
you already know where that goes. They're not
even hiding that. The disgusting part of this
is that she's willing to come out and
be like, we need to fight for Charlie
Kirk after she was going after him because
he bit the hand.
Because it's the same conversation. And guess what?
The same time he's telling you, Zionists are
attacking me, and I'm scared about that, and
I think and and Harrison, month before, says
he might be killed. She's going out into
the same moment.
Why? You don't think that's coordinated? She every
time Israel is going after something, she's doing
the same. Maybe because she's just a Zionist.
That's possible. But either way, you have to
recognize the coordination of this. So she's immediately
attacking him because he allowed that.
Now that he's out of the way, it's
all great. It's all good. He's he was
a hero. Now Ben Shapiro is gonna pick
it up. We're all good.
Here
is the clip in regard to Megyn Kelly.
Remember remember, don't forget this supposedly one thing
that he was clipped out of context about.
I hope Mario gets made thought of for
something like that. Like, this is insane to
ignore all these different things.
Avior, by a lot,
both privately and publicly, are pushing people like
you and me away, not like we're gonna
be pro Hamas,
Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly,
the way you are treating me is so
repulsive.
I have text messages, Meghan, calling me an
antisemite.
I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a
book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat,
literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and
fight for it. And there's another article out
in the Times of Israel today. I could
read it on air. I was just reading
before I got on. Charlie, what are you
doing? Like,
why are you what am I doing?
See, important to think about this again with
the Israel Netanyahu point.
Right? Or even even in a third sense,
the idea of Judaism.
Whether or not he thinks that, these are
very separate things. You have Judaism as a
religion that he clearly seems to support,
and then you have Israel, which is a
separate thing regardless of what anybody thinks. And
then you got Netanyahu as the driving force
that seems to be, at least by the
reports, what he was upset about and what
was causing the problem with Trump and him
and what he understood about it. So this
all adds up when you think about it.
It doesn't prove it, but it adds up
the idea that we're talking about him being
called out by Zionist for simply recognizing something
about these core points, not necessarily Judaism or
Israel as a whole. And they and they're
and that's because that's the thing. If you
understand Zionism, you recognize it's not about Israel
other than using that to get their agenda
or any other thing other than control and
ethnic cleansing. They don't care about these there's
some of these primary people in Israel are
atheists. They're publicly
and proudly
atheist Zionist.
Just the fact that that exists and they're
prominent in the conversation should explain to you
and prove to you that you're being misled.
But that point should be important to this.
So he's upset that these Zionists are attacking
him, and that arguably is the I mean,
not even arguably. That is the threat from
this larger conversation. It's the Zionist lunatics,
not the Jewish overlap, not the Israeli entity,
but the Zionist part of it, and they're
the ones that were upset with him.
Text messages, Meghan, calling me an antisemite.
I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a
book on the Shabbat.
I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath.
I visit Israel and fight for it. And
there's another article out in the Times of
Israel today. Also, I'm sorry. One more thing,
and I won't stop it again. But don't
forget, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism,
was an atheist, was very anti and was
openly writing out things about the hated Jews,
very antisemitic things or whatever you call it.
So recognizing the same point, right, that he
maybe as what he's doing
from a Zionist perspective is some, you know,
seen as,
against what they like, ultimately, what he's doing
is kind of like the rep like, I
I'm trying to think of the way to
frame it. Like, that he would represent the
reality of what they're trying to pretend to
be or something like that. I'm just thinking
of the different points. Overall,
that he's saying this at all challenges the
larger conversation of what happened. I could read
it on air. I was just reading before
I got on. Charlie, what are you doing?
Like, why are you what am I doing?
I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step
back here. Like, I'm an American citizen.
Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm
a Christian.
But, like, the sum of the mess and
you saw I mean, you've seen how I've
been treated, Meaghan, by some, not all, by
some. No. It's very irritating.
It's it's it's unfair. They they were coming
after you after a turning point for among
other people. So you had Dave Smith there.
Dave Smith is I'm sorry. I have to
stop it again. I lied. But so so
this is a clear divide point right here
where he is highlighting something that is different.
Right?
He's saying, I'm I'm pro Israel. I love
Ozi, but this right here, this is this
is coming after me. What do you think
that is? Like, so you have to understand
from a a very from what we're discussing,
having this person start to differentiate between this
this is a this thing's a pro maybe
you're not even realizing what that is yet
is a huge issue for a group trying
to keep that from being spoke, like trying
to control the narrative around his base.
To allow you to criticize Israel?
Put both sides the the Israeli side was
not allowed to, though. No. You're not allowed
to. It's even worse than that. Again, I
would just wanna repeat for the fifth time.
I love Israel. I want Israel to win.
But
my moral character is now being put into
question, Meghan. Not my decisions.
Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is
it smart or is it dumb? But, no.
I am a bad person if I do
this. And it's a I I could go
I mean, I you saw it, Meghan. It
was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and
text messages.
And if I were to be charitable and
generous, I will say, the people that are
attacking me are in a hyper paranoid state
because they're at war, and war tends to
make things black and white. I did. And
you're a hammer looking for a nail. So
I'm trying to be charitable, Meghan. Literally, I'm
trying to cut as much slack as I
can. Right? Beg, okay. What would it be
like if all of a sudden I'm starting
to see a pattern of behavior similar to
what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany
online? How would I behave? So that's, like,
my charitable
kind of overcompensation
spirit. At the same time, I'm like,
but you're it's it's not defensible to be
dumb.
Right? Yeah. So And it's See, how much
does this sound like what people like us
are saying? Right? Like, ultimately, like, aside from
the the inner part of it, like, the
idea that we're highlighting the difference here. Right?
There's people over here in this conversation that
might be acting because of the war, you
know, what but these groups here are acting
with deliberate intention and doing things that aren't
debatable. Right? You know? It's it's just very
interesting to me how much this stands out.
Offensive. It's offensive to those of us who
have been out there defending them in in
many instances against critics on our own side.
And now you have a couple accounts like,
well, what about this? Well, has it gone
on too
long? Like, is it time to wrap it
up? And the thing about Epstein is just
so bizarre. I don't know who he was
an agent for. It might have been Israel
or an asset And and or it might
have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate
about that. It's like there's some rule. You
can't go there when it comes to Israel.
Well, you and I believe that we're Americans
and Americans first, period. End of story. We
are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's where
I think this real issue comes from if
this is what happened
is the idea that America first is what
they really believe in, and they've been warped
into this Zionist thing. They don't even necessarily
see that. Not every single one of them
are all, you know, part of some knowing
manipulation.
And it then I honestly, you know my
opinion, the larger one. I think that most
of these people, if not the vast majority
of them, even at this level,
because it works better for the agenda, plausible
deniability,
are in these positions and don't even fully
recognize that they've been coaxed and driven and,
you know, where that funding came from the
whole time that even recognized. Like, that I
think there's more of that than we recognize.
And And so, this is might be a
moment of him coming to awareness that suddenly,
I'm
he's America first to his core or rather
Trump first is what I would call it,
and then suddenly recognize that that's being contradicted
And at the core point of it, that
he is being undermined by the very thing
that I think I'm supporting, and suddenly, that's
very confounding. That doesn't make sense. And, you
know, and you recognize not Israel, but this
core group of extremists.
That's what they both just recognized. Even Megyn
Kelly that they come after. They're talking about
well, you could argue they met Jewish people,
but I find that hard to believe in
what they just started with. They're talking about
the political Zionists.
And Israel,
we have funded, we have supported,
and they're up against a sea of Islamic
totalitarianism,
and we should be cheering for them. Right?
Because they're up against barbarians
and and monsters, and we want them to
win. However, here is
Please do your best to get around all
of the disgusting war propaganda and lies about
Palestinians. Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined
probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like, pretty right?
And you and I have been holding this
down, and you you probably get the negative,
oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like,
okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of
the feedback. Right?
But then all of a sudden,
like, I host a person that I Like,
they can't see a genocide. Come on. Let's
be real about the way. Megyn Kelly just
went on Piers Morgan and quite literally said,
maybe slightly paraphrasing because I remember exactly how
she said it, that a Palestinian would rather
watch her children starve than help a Jew
or something like that. It was some kind
of weird over the bottom line was that
these Palestinian people are would rather allow their
children to die than to, you know, do
the right thing. I mean, it's it is
so inherent. Like, this is the point of
dehumanization.
They've created they maybe she even believes that
somehow. That just every Palestinian, but you realize
that is disgusting.
Like, that that is vile
and and and ignorant.
Broad stroke as always. It's like saying all
of anything, every black person, every white person.
Yes. It's the same thing. I I moderate
the debate of my Right. Right? And I
give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time
to a pro Israel advocate,
and my moral character is being put into
question. And so I I just I think
it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna
try to
we're we're gonna just stamp out everything
type type of
practice, but it goes to the point where
if, for example, if I I have less
ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government
about backlash than
backlash than actual Israelis do. And
that's really, really weird, isn't it, Meagan? It
that that's the end of it. So despite
all of the all of the, we love
Israel, we're fighting for Israel, all that, you
know, everything else,
regardless of that counterbalance, is very problematic for
them. Like, listen to what he just said
right there. A person that I I moderate
the and
so I I just I think it's a
hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to
we're we're gonna just stamp out everything. Right.
Okay. So these are both people that pretend
to be free speech
warriors. Right? And so you're somehow
aware of and okay with this, you know,
overreactive censorship because they're, you know, they're going
what what for whatever reason, what are you
talking about? That maybe they're just stamping out?
What do you mean stamping out? What are
you saying right there? That they're controlling, they're
removing content?
I mean, what there clearly, there's an awareness
around something here that we're not that they
pretend isn't there.
That's they're talking, I mean, every which way
about this or even the last part. Type
type of
ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government
about backlash than actual Israelis do. And so
you're aware of that. So you're aware of
the reality that in this country, you are
less able to speak about a foreign country
than people outside this I mean, that is
so obvious.
So they know that. Right? And so you
have to you could piece all that. You
can consider how that all comes together in
the bigger picture.
And the next one.
Oh, that's this is just Glenn saying, this
is why Netanyahu
has continuously posted and appeared on American TV
and podcast talking about Kirk even as he
continues to destroy all of Gaza, which we'll
get into more tomorrow or the next day.
He wants to exploit Kirk's death to fortify
US support for Israel by depicting Kirk as
a stalwart defender of US financing.
Yep.
But that's supposed to be insulting or whatever.
It's obviously what's going on, at least in
one part.
Sykes points this out. Oh, no. Charlie Kirk
did not mention that Israel, and Mossad were
behind Jeffrey Epstein to his millions of followers.
Eyes
that Epstein
with his little friend, Ghislaine, and Ghislaine's father,
Robert Maxwell,
who is obviously a spy of the Israeli
intelligence agencies,
but there was something else going on here.
Epstein was not some sort of whiz kid
hedge fund manager.
Epstein
was playing a part.
Epstein
was a LARPer.
Epstein was cast for a specific role, and
he played it really well. The sweatpants and
the Harvard jacket,
the kind of disheveled hair,
looking as if he was so smart and
above the clouds that he was doing advanced
mathematic equations on the back of napkins. But
if you actually go into some of the
videos of people that met with Epstein at
the time, they said he was awfully unimpressive
when it came to finance and markets and
economics. And
it's nothing new that if you're in the
intel agencies, you want to try
and get as much blackmail
on powerful people as possible.
Easy, not hard.
And this is no longer just speculation. First
of all, the evidence that shows that Epstein
was a creation of either Assad, Israeli intelligence,
American intelligence, Saudi intelligence, or maybe he was
just a hired gun. Maybe he Can you
not recognize already by now that the in
this are we are we pretty clearly past
the point of some edited clip about him
saying somebody else's words? I just realized how
stupid it is they tried to sell you
on that. Understand
that all of the other talk about supporting
them or whatever else, it's these things alone,
regardless of what else you say. The idea
that you open the door to these things,
to an audience of people that aren't supposed
to consider these things.
And that audience being the battleground for Israel's
ability to survive
is enough to understand the possibility of what
we're talking about.
Who's just the guy that countries would go
to
and park a couple $100,000,000 and say, hey.
Can you get one of the members of
the royal family with a 13 year old
so we can get them to do what
we wanna do? Members of congress
are actively being blackmailed. The Epstein playbook
is being used on a daily
basis.
Jeffrey Epstein was not a financier.
He was not a hedge fund manager. Jeffrey
Epstein
was a key player
in a multi decade blackmail operation against the
most powerful people on the planet.
Oh, and and by the way, that's, you
know, bombshell breaking news about ten, fifteen years
too old. You know? Make sure you point
that out. Right? The reality that this that
was, like, the surface level reality that we've
been screaming about for a very long time.
But understand that this is
Netanyahu comes on to try to dispel this
idea,
which I think is
I mean, I was I can't even
with plenty of other examples, they never come
out like Netanyahu and, like, address head on
something like this unless it is, like, the
last possible effort,
at least in my experience.
So Netanyahu coming out on corporate media, both
in in any context, whether left or other,
UK, United States, anywhere, and coming at this
and saying, Israel was not involved in this.
It just shows you, one,
how much we're breaking through with these that
the independent media, right or wrong, is
dictating the conversation, guys. They're not able to
ignore us. That's a powerful thing. You have
to really recognize how much that's changing the
conversation and be proud of that.
I mean, from our perspective, since we're doing
this objectively nonpartisan with the the intention of
the truth, and that's it. Plenty of others
not doing that. Either way, my point is
that the fact that it's
I'd rather I'd I'd rather see
a thousand misleading Internet media along with all
of us than a corporate controlled, you know,
structure that's ignoring all of us. Well, either
way, my point here,
Chad of Ezra, Benjamin Netanyahu insist Israel had
nothing to do with Charlie Coatsch's assassination. He
adds that anyone who believes otherwise is out
of their mind. Netanyahu compares the rumor to
the old accusations
against Jews, like poisoning wells and drinking the
blood of Christian children.
Before I let you go, I want you
to address one thing and, and I've it's
just the absurdity about some of the Internet
rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie
Kirk,
murder. And, you know, I don't believe it
for one second, but,
I want you to, you know, make a
statement. It's it's so absurd.
You gotta love that journalism. Right?
God, it's not true and it's fake. I
don't believe it, but go ahead. What do
you have to say?
Great great job. Great job.
Newsmax, of course. Yeah. How stupid is that?
That's not journalism. That's
narrative management.
Like, as clumsy as it gets. And I
don't even know if they I don't even
know if they realize that.
They recognize that you're not allowed to call
this out. It's like inherent in their DNA
for these fake journalists.
And I've it's just the absurdity of it.
Some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel
is behind the Charlie Kirk,
murder. And, you know, I don't believe it
for one second, but, I want you to,
you know, make a statement. It's so absurd.
That's insane. That's insane.
Israel,
also changes the,
the orbit of the moon. Israel pushes the
sun. I mean, the whole thing is
it's not You mean aside from the multiple
assassinations you've recently carried out, like, right up
until recently in Qatar. Right?
But it's so crazy. It's like we're moving
the moon. It's like it's like what? Like,
that that's it made me laugh out loud
when I first watched this. I'm like, what
a like, you could have done better than
that. Netanyahu, you've done better in the past.
That's clumsy. But, I mean, it's just trying
to make it seem like this is just
ridiculous. A pull an assassination? Like, the idea
is not what you what I would argue
would have made more sense is to say
was to be, like, Charlie Kirk was a
massive supporter of us. Why would that even
make sense? But you see, it's just like
that's,
I guess, too too I don't know. I
don't know why you wouldn't have said that.
Like, argument to make it, like, so ludicrous
that a government that's killed many people in
this exact same way would do it again?
Yeah. That's crazy.
Totally insane.
It's
I I think it's so
absurd, so stupid, so stupid, and so ridiculous.
You can't believe that people are saying that.
He seems flustered if I'm being honest. They
just found the perpetrator. They'll get to, the
bottom of this. But,
they they go you know, they have no
limits.
When you hate Jews,
when you hate the Jewish state, you know
what? Oh, oh, that's what's happening now. Now
it's about anti Semitism. How did that happen?
I thought it was about hate I have
lefty lunatics going after the right, so now
they hate Jews too? Why not? Throw it
in. Hetrick. Going to say anything,
and promote all these absurd, absurd rumors.
And by the way, they're willing to to
kill us all the time. I mean, that's
what they're doing. And, you know, over the
centuries when Who's they now? The left?
To to everyone, the left hates Jews? Is
that what's happening now? I mean, I can't
even believe how cartoonish this has got. Like,
this person has always been this ridiculous,
but it was never this. Like, this has
become so incredibly mainstream, but it's not even
the remotely what the majority of people believe.
So, I mean, how do you not see
that as an indication that these power structures
are completely controlled when they don't care that
you all see them and they're do and
they're committing a genocide, and they still just
go, we're not doing that. We don't care.
We're gonna you know, you're wrong. And it's
just so it's
conspicuous.
I'm just I'm it's I'm just there's so
many it's one of those moments where you
just go like, am I am I sleeping?
Is this really happening?
When Jews, especially in the middle ages, the
horrific middle ages,
the worst things were said about Jews you
couldn't possibly believe. We were poisoning the wells.
We were drinking the blood of Christian children.
You name it. I mean, these things that
continued actually up to the holocaust.
The Nazis said the same thing. You mean,
you know, the holocaust, which they were working
with Nazi Germany during the final solution.
Don't forget that provable fact that's been very
clearly covered by Haaretz and and Dan Cohen
and
you know, that's why that doesn't make sense,
but their narratives are all you get today.
You know, we're, carrying vermin.
We're spreading disease,
and people believed it. And every time they
believed it, this was a prelude
to a greater and greater massacre culminating with
the worst massacre of them all, the holocaust.
Well, since then, we've learned, a, when people
spread these lies about us, prepare yourself for
the assault.
And, you know, they're trying to delegitimize the
state of Israel. Charlie Kirk said to me
that he wrote me this detail letter. You
have to fight the slander.
These untruths, these vilifications
have consequences.
And he was right. But I'll tell you
one thing. We're fighting on the battlefield
against the terrorists and winning,
and he was fighting on the battlefield of
ideas. And I think he was winning. He
was gonna win. That's why they shot him.
I hope they don't silence him. I don't
think people will, give in to these ridiculous,
ridiculous lies.
Right.
You know, lies like
Jews poisoning the well.
Right? Because that's completely a lie.
Like, this Haraz article was totally not telling
you about how place the material in the
wells.
Military documents from Israel point to Israeli army's
1948 biological warfare. Yeah. That's not a joke.
Very real. Written in 2022 by Herets. 04/01/1948,
many you know, I've gone over this many
times.
This is it's very provable. Now was there
people that lied about it? Sure. I'm sure
that happened too. But to claim that that's
one of those blood libels, this happened. And
it also happened recently. It happens all the
time where they dump dead animals in the
wells in Palestine in in Palestinian farms. They
were just covering that. International media where I
mean, it's all over the place. My point
is to simply highlight how these things you
can prove are still supposedly fake,
and it demonstrates why people lie about us.
It just kills me. You guys can look
this stuff up for yourself. Or this, as
Dan Cohen has covered, and and this is
what's funny, by the way. If you try
to look at any of these, including this
one, which is why I have it on
the Wayback Machine,
watch what happens.
Oops. Weird. Jerusalem, we have a problem, even
though it came up very quickly. Did you
see it?
It says, Zionist media's effort to work with
Nazis.
That's what it is. It's a Horace article.
Now, I have it somewhere. I wasn't planning
on talking about this. I'll try to include
it in the show notes. Here's the link
to it. I'm sure you can find it.
Just get that link. We've put it on
the Wayback Machine.
But the point,
even according to Heretz.
Oops. Gosh. Darn it.
The the interrogation occurred two weeks after the
these,
conference in Berlin in which Nazi officials discussed
the implementation of the final solution.
And that's the I'm trying to rush.
Transcripts of the interrogation, which were released to
the public last month in the Israel state
archives, include information on the dark chapter of
Lehi's history. Lehi is the found is one
of the foundational elements of Zionism.
Ergun Stern the Stern Gang,
Lehi,
which was the ties with Nazi Germany.
This is very well documented, but they call
it blood libel. The point is that Lehi
continued to ally with Nazi Germany
after the final solution began.
And And here's one of them. This is
one of these guys they they publicly promoted
in the beginning who was one one of
the old Zionists from the Lehi party that
was literally saying kill them all. Erase the
memory of them. They were proudly sharing this.
Amalek. Right? The point is he lied about
all of this. He lied about what they
were going through. He lied about the putting
stuff in the wells. So what else is
he lying about? Right? What else is he
manufacturing that is so crazy that we would
do that even though we've done it many,
many times? He says, Charlie Kirk was murdered
for speaking the truth and defending freedom. A
lionhearted friend of Israel, he fought the the
lies and stood tall for Judeo Christian civilization.
I spoke to him only two weeks ago
and invited him to Israel. Sadly, the visit
did not take place. Well, according to his
friends, there is offers that weren't accepted
and a lot of anger, a lot of
threats.
We lost an incredible human being. His bound
boundary his boundless pride in America and his
valid belief in the free in free speech
will leave a lasting impact. I mean, it's
just disgusting. We talked about he doesn't believe
any of those things. He censors people all
the time. He's calling for censorship in the
country right now. Max Blumenthal says, we don't
know yet who killed Charlie Kirk, and this
was on the tenth. But aren't you the
guy who has done more than anyone on
the planet to renormalize political assassinations?
Exactly.
Now Robert put an excellent article out today.
Israel carried out assassinations across four continents.
The Doha attack in Qatar
is no exception.
Now for time, especially, I'm gonna let you
read this. I'll probably go over it more
in-depth in the next show. It's simply making
this point.
First of all, Israel's long and very documented
history of assassinations
every any country,
everywhere.
And the point being
that in regard to Cutter and the rest,
they're calling it unprecedented and crazy. Well, at
the same time, they carry these they carried
the same kind of acts across multiple countries
and multiple continents. Even even just recently. We
saw the Qatar attack. We saw the the
killing of, the entire
political
milt structure of Yemen.
I mean, this is just straight up terrorism
across the world. So we're gonna act outraged
that they might be able to do something
or claim it's not possible that you might
be able to carry out something else?
Well, this is why I find this clip
to be so relevant yet again. Now this
rabbi speaking with Fox News, very Zionist, so
that's clear, that not all rabbis are Zionist.
Plenty of rabbis out there are the orthodox
rabbis are very, very anti Zionism,
which they don't want you to see.
His statement is about going after you anywhere
in the world. Okay. We'll recognize that when
they say you were involved with October 7,
will you realize how many times they've spread
that out? People who who cheered,
we're going after you. Right? People who allowed
this to who don't you know, people who
support Palestine, you're a part of it. You're
allowing it to continue. So all I'm simply
highlighting is that they're making the case that
if they feel you're responsible in some way,
they can go after you anywhere in the
world. He says, even England.
I think that's quite relevant today.
You're a terrorist, and you're part of October
7. We're coming after you, and we don't
care if you're in Qatar. We don't care
if you're in Lebanon, and it could be
even if you're in England. We'll get you.
And
Yeah. Who cares about the law? Right? We'll
go we'll do whatever we want, which is
why I felt it was important to reiterate
this to end the show.
Monda Weiss and plenty of others covered this.
I'll give you the documents so you can
prove for yourself. Justifying land grab, specifically around
the West Bank, Israel says it is allowed
to ignore international law
anywhere it wants.
I mean, this is directly from their own
documentation.
Many times, as I've said over the years,
they presented it in front of the Knesset,
like their congress, in the state of Israel,
in the recent response. So basically, to sum
this up, it was in regard to them
being challenged about the West Bank,
The world and including people within their own
cadets saying, well, it's against the law. That's
annexation of the of people. That's that's illegal.
And their argument was, well, look.
We can do anything anywhere in the world.
Why is it different in the West Bank?
That's actually what they argued, guys, and it
shows you their mindset and what they believe,
and in many cases, what the reality is.
In their response,
in Hebrew, the letter to the court
says, the Knesset, this is a quote, has
no limitation
which prevents it from legislating
extraterritorily
anywhere in the world,
including
the West Bank.
Think of that hubris. Think of that the
reality of the mind is that thinking that
they can do what they want anywhere in
the world, that they are not bound by
international law, which is another quote that's in
the article. It's directly from their own statement.
I know it's in Hebrew, but it's the
proof. It's the evidence. It is the reality,
and you could prove it for yourself.
You'll find you could if you dig into
the story, you'll find the evidence of them
literally standing in the Knesset
saying this.
So think about that. The idea that they
believe they can do these things, kill people,
attack people, break the law, steal land,
anywhere in the world.
That is the mindset of Zionism.
I'll end with some wise words from Derrick
Brosse. While I truly do suspect that Charlie
Kirk's assassination is part of a larger operation
designed to foment chaos and division within The
United States, Operation Gladio style, I am also
praying and hoping cooler heads will prevail.
Rather than listening to the provocateurs
calling for more violence or using this as
an excuse
to score political points against the other side,
I pray people will instead opt to use
this moment as an opportunity to come together
to cool down the rhetoric and the hate.
To be clear, I'm not attempting to diminish
the reality that both sides of the American
corporate parties have authoritarian tendencies. This is a
reality we cannot ignore. The Democrats wanted to
round up and force vaccinate people during COVID
nineteen eighty four. They also have a problem
with free speech. The Republicans have their own
nationalist authoritarian streak as well as we are
seeing with Trump. And, also, have other situations
in regard to the vaccination or, you know,
the the the same side of that in
this even similar conversations. But the real point
is what you can see with immigration, what
you can see with the
national police state, with biometrics, with surveillance. I
mean, it's just all there when they come
together is when you get the full picture.
And it says, and they are willing to
silence speech when it suits them too. Both
sides also play into the trap of labeling
their political enemies as extremists or domestic terrorists.
I've been warning for years, he has, that
this dangerous rhetoric only adds fuel to the
fire and gives the state the push it
needs to use such labels against the broader
population.
It needs to end before it's too late.
So while I do fear what's coming up
next, I am also doing my part to
hold space for rational,
clear headed, yet honest discussions.
I pray you do the same.
Well said.
So I'll leave you
with the same clip
to end today.
Now this is a long conversation today. It's
four hours. We know we do tend to
do it often, but there's a lot in
this that connects to it. But I made
it I intentionally
made sure that the bulk of that part
was at the end of the show today
because I wanted this everything we discussed today
builds like, this is what's so frustrating with
the way that
most of the mainstream alternative media and plenty
of the regular
independent media operate when it comes to, you
know, you focus on a story and you
kinda carve it out in a way that
make you know, it presents your case, but
does it so like, you know, like, there's
plenty of supplementary information
that build the fuller picture
that may even sort of undermine certain parts
that then people just kinda, let's go leave
that off. Right? I'll just I just won't
include that. It makes my case better.
The reality is that there's a whole lot,
and that's what I try to do with
this show, is build out not just the
point, but all of the supplemental and surrounding
information so, you know, you can come to
your conclusion about it. So you can look
at it and go, well, Ryan, I see
what you're getting at and I see why
you see that, but I look at it
this way. Because you can make your own
opinion about how the full picture comes into
view.
You have to realize how rare that is
in the conversation. This is why with the
people in the IMA, we all share the
same mentality. It's obvious that we have similar
idea with when it comes to principles, integrity,
honor in this conversation.
So think about it.
When this conversation, when the next thing pops
off, whatever's going on, keep this in mind.
Be better than what we've seen up until
now. Be objective
to a fault.
There's never been a more important time to,
you know, default on that side. So continue
to call these things out. Continue to push
back against these narratives. Because everything that's happening
right now, every single thing we're seeing, as
usual, is being used to drive in this
larger agenda.
That's not my opinion, guys. I mean, it's
that's you know, whether this happened because of
something else or, you know, organic,
it's pretty obvious that they're all going you
know, we're all using this in his memory
and his call to push in the and
so over here, if they hate Jews, over
here, it's about left, over they hate the
Muslims, everyone.
And all these people seem to be I
mean, even if that ends up being one
of those situations, they don't know that right
now. So what they show you is we're
more interested in using him
to push our agenda of hate or whatever
the agenda is.
And we care about that more than we
care about finding his actual killer.
And these are people that are professing to
care about this person.
Right? So as somebody might try to frame,
like, what we did today as the one
that, you know, the how how
disrespectful
that you'd like, as I'm the one that
hates him. The reality is with what I
did today, I have far more respect for
Charlie Kirk than all the rest of them
trying to lie about what's going on or
rather just push their narrative for their purposes.
But I'm sure it won't be seen like
that.
Thank you for tuning in today.
This platform continues to be under attack. So
if you wanna support us, if you wanna
keep this going, make sure you find your
ways to reach out even just words of
encouragement. I mean, it goes a long way
for me. But, you know, on, on that
note, so it's not always the negative. You
know, we, I feel like we're on the
incline right now. I feel like we're doing,
we had a great couple months. We're continuing
up, but, you know, every day,
they're more of the same comes through. So
we're gonna keep doing this regardless. I'm sure
we've shown that by now. So if you
wanna keep this growing and more information and
more articles and more research, then let us
know. Show us how show us what you
think of our work because we do this
for free. We put it out for you.
So thank you for being here. Thank you
for fighting. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were
buying it from Israel. Who did they buy
it from? Or I think they were buying
it from. We have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel,
sell companies oversell companies who affect the supply
chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors, and the world is
our stage.