Every American sitting at home right now needs
to realize
that you are paying for a genocide. Take
this one. Rise up. Rise up, America.
Rise up. It is time to take back
this country from these corrupt
politicians.
It is time. It is beyond time. We're
going after the loaded off. Yeah. Hold on.
Thank you for your service.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 09/07/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Have a
really packed show. A lot of important things
to discuss. A few in really important topics
that doesn't feel like many people are talking
about that I wanna make sure we touched
on. And it's pretty easy to see why
these things are falling by the wayside for,
you know, partisan reasons and just because there's
a hell of a lot going on in
the world today. But we're gonna start with
some important conversation around the partisan
developments and Massey. And one point that I
really wanna make around him and a point
he made, whether or not he even means
what he said, an important point to make
about principles in this conversation that I that
I keep making. I wanna do a focus
on just a quick kind of, like, few
data point updates on on Israel since we're
not gonna focus on that, entirely today.
And we're gonna do an important conversation around
the max Maxwell part of this. And not
just the developments you've seen, but what I
really see a lot of this adding up
to. And, yes, some very important developments that
you're gonna wanna see, some of which you
probably did, seeing a solid over the last
couple of days took place, including someone connected
to the DOJ
being caught by O'Keefe
saying they're going to edit the Epstein files
to get rid of all the Republicans and
make it look like only Democrats. Maybe he's
making it all up to impress the date
he was on. Either way, it's an important
statement seeing as how it seems that both
partisan sides play the exact same game. And
as usual, they're probably all involved. That's pretty
I mean, I wouldn't assume that. But the
idea is to understand how clearly it is
not a one-sided
game, any of the stuff we're talking about.
There's there's ways it's used, but when it
comes to you, it's about control. Always has
been. K? Now we're we're gonna talk about
Stargate, which I said in the title, which
I think is important. That's one of the
things that I don't think is really getting
a lot of conversation. But even more importantly,
as of August 27,
another COVID nineteen or rather, let's make it
as clear as possible to start. The new
updated twenty five twenty twenty six
Pfizer COVID nineteen mRNA shot was just approved
by the FDA for 65
and older, and then five to 65 if
you have an underlying condition, which is, like,
seventy percent of this country.
Don't quote me on that. Just off the
top of my head, just probably
worse, to be honest, despite what they never
show us.
But it's incredible that I that I I
don't see really anybody talking about that. I
know there's some probably out there that I
don't see. I wasn't and I had I
hadn't seen that. This is August 27, just
last week.
But with all of this going on, I
found it to be pretty shocking to see
that that wasn't getting a lot of coverage.
We and we're gonna juxtapose this next to
what just happened in front of congress with
RFK Junior, what they said about this,
and shots in general, all this pushback about
how bad they are, and then saying Trump
should get
the Nobel Prize for
Operation Warp Speed, and then, again, comparing it
to this. So how can you be all
up in arms about the COVID shots and
then the same exact thing you're talking about
is now approved going forward?
Regardless of the limitations, it's not about liberty
here, guys. You can't make both cases.
We're gonna talk about, like I said, Maxwell
redacting
interesting deep state investments in the Trump administration
and, really, just more of the same, using
the deep state to be sort of facetious.
It very well could be. What democrat what
Republicans have been calling the deep state are
all the people we're talking about, so you
could decide. Bill Gates and Zuckerberg and all
every one of the people that was gonna
be marching down in handcuffs to tribunals are
now backing him like they were at the
beginning at his inauguration. The point for those
of us who are aware of the full
partisan lie,
it's what we were telling you. Left or
right, this is what it looks like. And
now it's this technocratic,
you know, goose step as we watch them
all do it in front of us and
cheer winning. It's sad. But I think a
lot of conservatives who are not stupid are
very aware that's a problem because they were
saying that before we got here. And the
cheerleading, Benny Johnson types are not enough to
get people who aren't stupid to go good
things suddenly when they knew that was bad
to begin with. Now I'm sure people disagree
on whether those people are inherently bad or
good, but it's not about that in this
point. It is. But in the immediacy of
the point, it's about whether or not the
people who are cheerleading you into whatever's happening
are being honest with you.
That's important.
Now we're gonna touch on Venezuela and a
few other points. Again, with time depending on
a lot of the kind of latter points,
but really important to see how the Venezuela
attack, rather the specifically, the the ship that
was attacked by The United the US government
where we have no information to back up
what actually happened. Even if everything they said
was true,
it's a crime.
There's just no way around it. They're it's
just showing you that they continue to be
this
might makes right, you know,
rampantly lawless power structure that does whatever they
want because they're strong enough to. And I've
made that pretty clear. Hopefully, that's not gonna
stand because that is not what we pretend
we are in this country, and most Republicans
who wanna pretend he's trying to somehow do
the wrong thing to get back there, still,
it it just it's obvious we're going the
wrong direction right now, and it's not left
or right.
It's just what our government's doing.
Now I wanna start with a couple points
that I thought were important. So we we
did an IMA panel recently,
and, I the oh, I I should actually
grab that one. Let me grab I'll make
sure I put it in the show notes.
Someone I forget the
anyway, I'll I'll make sure I've included it.
We just did a good one around tech
and and kind of, insulating yourself from it
at the same time, how it can be
used. It's a good conversation.
But I I just brought up in the
chat that I wanna make sure something that
I'd said we were gonna do that I
wanna get to is finding somebody. We're discussing
right now some of those possibilities. Somebody's out
there doing really good work who is on
the, you know, lower smaller scale when it
comes to to to people that can, support
their work. And, like, in many ways, because,
at least as I would see it, because
they're doing it for the right reasons and
they're doing it the right way. So they
get suppressed, they get censored, and so I
wanna help raise those people up for doing
it the right way. So we talked about
that and whether we're gonna be doing that
soon. And update on the IMA in general,
the reason these things have been dragging out.
Odysee is still working on the back end
in regard to the the supposed to be
kind of the portal we're gonna be using.
And, you know, and, again, going forward, any
of this can change. It really depends on
whether it works for us. But right now,
this is the plan, and it and they've
done it all
because they believe in what we're doing. And
so once that happens, we'll try to shift
more into that. The point is that's taken
longer, much longer than expected as these
technological things tend to. But we will plan
on doing that. And I wanted to say
that in general because there's a lot of
people out there doing really good work in
this field that just aren't partisan. And more
I mean, far more than when I started
doing this, it is near impossible to break
through without having some kind of partisan
that's that, you know, leaning, and that's why
people do that.
So
I want you to say this in general
to make sure anybody out there trying to
do this.
Know that you can.
I don't care what anybody else says and
what they're all the naysayers and all the,
you know, people that will poo poo on
anything that you do because you, you know,
you they anything.
You can do this. If you believe in
this and you think you can make a
difference, I would 100% support that, and I
will if you wanna send your work to
me. You know, the point
is, when I started doing this,
I was I you know, I am a
chef, a classically trained chef. That's what I
did my entire life. And, you know, I
I've I've, in my own time, researched a
lot of things. I cared a lot of
other stuff in the background, but I didn't
have any classical training and anything like this.
Just decided to care about it. Decided to
make this platform. Never believed it would become
what it is today. Never never expected rather.
And it has you know, we have a
level of success with this platform that is
that is rare in this field. And and
and part of me that in in in
a major way, that's a part of what
shows me that not everybody in here that
has some level of reach is automatically suspect,
but I do question every single thing involved
with everybody, including myself because we have to.
But the point is that when I started
this, I was in an RV traveling The
United States. That's what I was doing at
the time. I'd broken away from my current
job, you know, and I was picking up
cooking jobs here and there and eventually stopped
places and got a lot. The point is
that I started this in an RV living
in a trailer park. And over this long
grueling process, we're still going back and forth,
two steps forward, one step back. We've we've
to the nail, clawed out
on each of our own. I'm just wanting
to point out that you can do it
if you if you have the passion to
do it and believe in it. Anybody.
I think that's important to think about.
Now
one thing that I've been saying a lot
over the years that I haven't said a
lot lately, but I really think is important
to reiterate
is it and because because of the partisan
nonsense and all the ridiculousness going on in
the world, it's simply just that, you know,
you do in what we do in our
lives every single day, whether it's the media,
engaging within people in our lives, is to
just focus on that day just being a
little bit better than yesterday. And I do
the this is something that I really try
to instill in, you know, everything that I
do.
Look at what you're doing that day, and
it's not about, you know, you we all
fail. We all miss things, and it's just
about trying to be a little bit better
than you were yesterday.
Staying stagnant and the same is what we're
driven to be today, and it's not what
makes a happy person. And the ultimate idea
is that we you know, you just try
to better yourself, and sometimes you don't succeed.
But just a simple effort of trying to
better yourself, to be kinder, to be more
compassionate, have more empathy, to to do kind
things for people that don't necessarily deserve it,
need it, want
it. It's just important to think about. Do
the best you can to be a little
bit better than yesterday because that looking at
the corporate media, for example, you know, we
can do better. Looking at the mainstream alternative
media, Looking at the way that we conduct
ourselves within this sphere, we can do better.
And that's what we fight for on this
and plenty of other platforms like this.
So I wanna start with a point about
BitShoot that recently came out that, because that
you know, as we said many times over
the years, BitShoot is a platform that is
easily representative of, like, the the, you know,
what real free speech looks like. Like, what
they're trying to do to their detriment, in
many ways I've gone over, they're fighting for
free speech to their detriment.
And so they and they've supported us over
the years and and, you know, in many
different ways and ultimately do believe in what
we're doing. And as I said before, when
we we were like,
when the this was, what,
I don't know, two months ago when we
ended up talking about, being an ambassador and
then signed out with them to support Bitshoot.
The point was
that I already support them. I already believe
in their platform, and I I have been
supporting in any way. So, ultimately, I'm happy
to do that. This is another extension of
that that they gave us early access to,
which essentially, like,
membership stuff for the platform itself. So if
you sign up for this, it's ultimately you
can read the details on this. It's about
no, you know, no ads on the entire
platform, you know, different benefits therein. For me,
the real point is, aside from all the
benefits is, you know me, it's I'm usually
to my detriment in that same way. It's
about whether you believe in this stuff. There
are benefits that will that you will gain.
And I even if there are ways I
can include new benefits, but I usually don't.
It's just about whether you want to support
this platform through BitShoot. And through doing so,
also support BitShoot.
So there's monthly, there's yearly. I'll include that
for you, and it's just another way to
support us. Now what I'll be clear about,
when I'm doing this kind of stuff, it's
not like I want those of you out
there that are die hard supporters to go
jump up and find more to do it
another way. So you want to? Yes. That's
great. It's fantastic.
Never say no if you wanna support us.
But it's really about somebody who's new to
the show, who wants to find a way
to support us. Here's one more way. And
there's plenty of links down below for you
to do so. But in doing this, you're
also supporting BitChute, which is a platform who's
doing everything it can to fight for free
speech. So I think that's a good thing
to include. And I very much do support
what they're trying to do. And, again, since
we're talking about BitChute, we'll be doing another
fine points on Monday, which is, Bruce Fine
and Jeffrey Wertick. And I've I've been joining
them pretty much every week to talk about
the constitutional crisis going on because Bruce is
constitutional expert. And I think it's a healthy
and important conversation, and we definitely don't agree
on everything. There's been some some spicy moments
here and there, but it's important to have
these conversations in a way that is seeking
real positive change, you know, discussing it and
trying to find outcomes that, you know,
align with our real values and principles. Anyway,
if you wanna support us through both these,
I'll include that for you.
One last tweet thing I wanna get into
around this point. Just thought that was interesting.
I don't know if you guys this is
the newest thing I saw. This was the
IMA panel we posted. In fact, there's the
link to it, but it won't be on
there for some reason. IMA preparing to fight
back and insulate yourself from technological control, and
it just has this weird untitled
blank thing on there.
Now it's there. You can click it. It
goes to the thing. So what's weird is
that oh, so now now it's there. Anyway,
the point was just showing you some weird
anomaly that I saw on Twitter today. It
was there no matter what I did earlier,
but that was the the real point was
just to include this. I always like to
show you this stuff before we get into
everything else because I find this to be
interesting. Could just be random nonsense. It could
be suppression, censorship, or it could be what
I think some of this stuff tends to
be more anomalous, like, toward the different
algorithmic social engineering type of things going on.
Now this I just find to be suppression.
So this happens to me almost every single
day, and it happens to me like, people
talk about bit rate suppression and all that,
probably this. But the fact that it happens
to me probably every hour, all day long
and I just want you guys to see
this because this is the kind of stuff
that people like us deal with in this
in this field. That's what I think this
is. You can decide for yourself. When we're
trying to use this and I get to
this point to where no matter what I
do, every single thing won't load.
And it really is just this interesting,
you know
I don't know. It's part of this. It
goes on for maybe thirty minutes. I have
to try and find something else to do.
No matter what you do, every single one
Twitter just won't load. Now if you try
to air something from another platform, Twitter won't
load. That's specifically about me doing it, which,
again, could just be some kind of bit
rate thing. Right? Well, that's strange. Oh, that's
the video. That's why. But, Anyway, the point
was I thought I thought it was out
of space for my you'll see. This is
what it should look like. More perfect along
the outlines. For those in the podcast, I'm
crazy. Don't worry about it. The point though
is that clearly this is something that is
happening constantly. And you know how possible it
is to use this especially when you're, I
think it's about saving content like this. Holding
over tabs, saving them, it auto refreshes every
hour. And the point is eventually, you just
it, like, maxes out what you can do,
which is just ridiculous to me. So maybe
it's nothing. I thought it was important to
include. I do think there's a lot of
this kind of stuff going on today.
Now, let's get started with
some opening points that I think are relevant
to all of this. This is an article
that I want you to read, and then
I wanna talk about Massey and some of
the interesting principle points.
This is just to say this because we're
only briefly gonna talk about Israel, and I'm
gonna go into this and sort of the
weaponized migration elements of this in another show.
Robert put this up yester oh, excuse me,
on the fifth. Exposing MAGA Zionist Muslims who
hate who who use hate to distract you.
Now we've talked about this a lot, and
he names people directly in this. Kirk, Loomer,
a lot of them. And the bottom line
is what we're seeing
is that and this is two parts. People
that MAGA people that are using this kind
of network, UAE and others connected to it
in particular, but also just the
fake, like, activist Arabs that he's discussing. Not
entirely everybody out there. There are I'm sure
there are people who are Arabs or Palestinian
who who don't like who support Israel, let's
say. Find it hard to believe, but I
know that they exist in some case or,
I mean, I'd like to believe. But just
being objective, I'm sure it's possible. But the
more you think you do it, it seems
very difficult. But the point is that you
can see a lot of these people who
are funded through Israel that are very easy
to prove. They work through Israel channels. They
work through Israeli funding. And there are these,
you know, people out there that say, I'm
Palestinian, and I support Israel, and they're lying
about every you know, Palestinians lie about everything.
And this gets it becomes this fake network
of they go see. Even Arabs know, and
it's just this minority of very dishonest people
that stem through Zionism and Israeli manipulation.
And it's very, very, very, very transparent. And
so it just kills me like the MEMRI
channel that Loomer and Jones always share from.
It's quite literally funded and currently ran by
Israeli intelligence. Not not even x intelligence. Literally,
currently unit 8,200, and people that built it
were former found. I mean, it's just insane
and very insulting to your intelligence.
And that you I mean, think of it
like this. You take some KKK leader who's
very Christian and has all this Christian things
in the background and spans with different priests
and whatever and goes on the channel and
starts screaming about how we need to kill
every Muslim in the world. And then some
Muslim channel run by extremists who dedicate themselves
to misinforming people over there about what Americans
think about Muslims create this entire thing around
how, look, that's what all Christians think about
Muslims. You know, we all know that happens
to take things out of context and mislead.
Or the fact that that one person thinks
that, does that mean every Muslim feels that
way? If Lindsey Graham says we should do
x, y, and z, does the whole government
feel that way? You know, we know it's
nuance,
but they play it. Now even worse, the
MEMRI channel uses these kind of people who
aren't even really actually supporters of those groups
and just are cosplaying as he writes in
this article. My point is that we know
they mislead. They know they lie. In some
cases, using radicals, but that does not represent
the full picture. It's a really important article,
and this is really about how they're using
this to distract. And this overlaps with the
weaponized migration and the provable elements that Israel
is creating a lot of this and that
you can see Jones and the rest leading
like this and Elon Musk. It's like
global effort to, like, push back with immigration.
It's all coordinated, and we'll go over that
in another show. I mean, it's very clear
to see that post October 7, the Daily
Wires, the Ben Shaperos of the world, they
got marching orders. And it's very clear that
they were they they were to drive people
into nationalism
hard and, like, from more than before and
into the idea of this whole weaponized migration
overlap, like, in reverse to use that. It's
not hard to see, and it's all being
driven through Israel.
But read this to understand how important and
obvious this is.
We'll come back to that. I just wanna
put that in your mind for an upcoming
show. Read it for yourself.
Now this is interesting to me.
So here's what Massey put out. Now you
guys have heard my point. Those that watch
this show know that I'm not supporting a
politician.
I mean, regard like I said, regardless of
whether it's a place like this where I
feel like he's being somewhat consistent throughout, like,
the last couple years, let's say. But I
just I just gotta take a lot longer
than that for me to support any politician
because I've been played, manipulated like we all
have far too many times. So I just
care to reflect on that and act instead
of just trusting the next politician like a
lot of people do. The point though is
that I question him, like all of them.
And, yes, I can see that there's point
you know, Pete, like, the one of the
points now is, Massey, you didn't do anything
about Epstein back when Democrats were there. Okay.
Sure. Maybe he's got a political agenda. Does
that make what he's doing false? No. That's
a childish worldview. That's a that's a willfully
deceptive way to look at it. It could
mean that, but it also, with all the
other evidence, can clearly show you that the
evidence is also true. So you are dismissing
true information around a sexual predator blackmail
pedophile network that you were fighting because Massey
doesn't like Trump or whatever. Like, that's a
really crazy way to think of the world.
But see, this is the point. I don't
think most people feel that way. There's lines
being drawn all over the place. Anyway, we'll
get to that more in a second. This
point
is about the idea that I don't I
don't care this case. I mean, I do
it in the larger sense, but whether he
means this. The point I'm making is this
is what a principled stance looks like. Whether
or not he has this stance and whether
or not this is what he really means,
it's about the way this is being presented.
Okay. So what it is, gun owners of
America says the gun owners of America oppose
any and all gun bans. Now before we
get into it, I agree.
This is how it's important. This is what
it looks like to have a principled stance.
Now, yes, could you draw a picture
of some lunatic in a certain circumstance where
even I would probably go, yeah. Probably smart
as take their gun away?
Yes. But the point is even though those
situations arise because I have a principled stance
around things like with free speech, I go,
yep. Well, we're gonna stand with what's right,
which is that the the reality of our
rights are that that's not supposed to happen
regardless of fill in the blank. Same with
free speech.
So when it says Trump DOJ is looking
to at ways to ban transgender Americans from
owning guns, well, we already went through this,
and we made the same point last time.
I understand the logic, especially when you can
see that there's more, like, with government manipulation
around me. Can even begin to, like, manduring
candidates and fake defense. Yes. It matters. Regardless
of all that, the point is that the
narrative after the fact is like it's like
during COVID. You don't say, well, shall not
be infringed, asterisk, except for a pathogen.
It's funny how we can make that logical
point that's based on principle in one certain
conversation, but not use the same principle elsewhere.
I think most people can. But you begin
to see people who are dishonest who use
principles.
Use what you think. Use what they know
you want them to think to push you
into a certain position.
So Massey says, I oppose all gun bans
as well.
Okay.
I simply said, whether or not you agree
with his stance, and, again, whether or not
it's even actually his stance, this is what
it looks like to stand by your principles.
Now in a general sense, a person who
believes that there shouldn't be gun bans rather
who just understands the second amendment,
and that person then saying in this context,
this is a case where you should say
all bans are wrong even though we agree
with how dangerous that can be. That is
what it looks like to stand by your
principles. That was the only point I was
making. And what's crazy to me is how
many people
are like, oh, more hero worship, more politician.
And I get why you might assume that
that's where this is coming from, but that's
my whole point in this.
Well, two of them, obviously, is principles. And
then the idea that people who feel like
they're outside of the partisanship
still seem like they're bound by the partisanship.
Because if your only response is that, oh,
morp
look at the content.
It's about the stance. Now look. If you
under if you wanna believe he's lying about
it, then that should be the point. Not
that this is people try like, it's also
possible as an objective person that Massey is
who he pretends to be. You see how
interesting it is just to be objective and
actually
it's such a breath of fresh air. And
that's why I find myself around people these
days that at whether I disagree or agree
with their general points, who stand by their
principles in any context. It's not hard to
see today. It stands out like crazy compared
to these clownish mainstream alternative media people.
So I just think that was interesting. And
I just simply said this to this response.
Most are wildly missing the point of this
post driven by partisan politics as usual. If
you think this is about anything but an
action regardless of who took it and how
it shows a principled stance based on the
ideal put forward, whether he believes it or
not, you are mistaken. But, you know, that
gets lost on people out in these conversations.
The point is
even if it's difficult,
this principle you know, you have things you
believe in for a reason. And so in
this case, like with COVID, you wouldn't go,
well, you could go grandma, so rights are
gonna be put on hold. Or in this
case, well, they are crazy, so let's let
let them have guns. And then that will
build into somebody else that Trump, the same,
or Biden deems to be crazy. Right? So
we all agree. Yeah. Those are bad examples
and they're clearly crazy. Then it gets to
one that's a little more difficult. Well, we
say people who believe in Palestine
are crazy. But see that, you know, that
you could find an example that everybody could
acknowledge today. Point though is that it becomes
whatever they want it to be, and plenty
of people, like the people we're discussing at
the top of the paradigm, mainstream alternative media
will gaggle along and go, yay. They're right.
Because that guy's crazy. You're Democrats even though
it violates the principle of the constitution or
any number of different things we talked about.
I really do think this is an important
point.
And then Derek says, even the NRA is
against banning trans people from having guns.
Will MAGA be consistent or abandon the second
amendment too?
Blatantly
unconstitutional.
Second amendment groups slam floated gun ban for
transgender Americans.
It's amazing to see the supposed left platforms.
And, see, here's what's interesting.
It's the same kind of point we were
just making. So let's say, you know, Politico,
for example, left leaning platforms, who clearly, even
as a personal level, probably just you know,
there are people in these platforms that I
don't think are in the know who hate
Trump, who who clearly identify as the left
first right. Right? So but, nonetheless, they run
these major platforms and clearly are part of
the propaganda machine. The point is that they
can write an article that says, oh my
god. Look at even these people don't agree.
This is pretty unconstitutional.
But in any other context, they would be
fighting tooth and nail to get it done
because but they see a political opening to
go after Trump because it's easy. It's open.
This makes them look ridiculous.
Now
is that political motivation?
Clearly.
Does it make it wrong? No.
You see how easy that is to figure
out? The problem is that people tend to,
you know, well, they're doing it for political
reasons, so la la. I should ignore it
because they're trying to manipulate me. Well, yes.
They are. But maybe the whole manipulation is
get you get you to ignore the truth
on top of everything else.
You think these things would be easier to
understand for most people. Now on this last
point, I just thought this was worth including
in this because I found this to be
incredible from the so they'll, you know, say
it left and right, guys. Your government, it
just wants to control your life.
True stream media.
Quote, the statement that our rights do not
come from our laws
or our governments is extremely troubling, says Cain.
Oh, really? You mean the reality of our
constitution? I mean, so this is what I'm
so alarmed about. I actually don't believe that
these idiots know what they're talking about, but
have been trained over a long career to
truly think that they do by the people
who want them to be there.
Pretty simple to think about. I could be
wrong, of course, but how can you possibly
make sense of this?
True Stream Media says, did senator Tim Kaine
just admit he never read the declaration of
independence and doesn't comprehend the principles this country
was founded upon? Well, guess what? Left and
right, the majority, if not entirety of them,
also think this way.
We're we're we are very we are very
far from where we're pretending we're fighting for
right now, but we should still be fighting.
I think that's obvious.
Notion that rights don't come from laws and
don't come from the government,
but come from the creator.
That's what the Iranian government believes. It's a
theocratic regime
that
bases its rule on Shia law. See. Now
this is just an alarming overlap. So now
you're trying to undermine the basis of the
constitution
because Iran bad guy, except for the fact
that that's not even remotely what we're talking
about. Because you could say god given because,
yes, that was obviously prevalent like it is
today, but you could also say inherent, which
it did.
Your choice. So you could choose to make
it about that and make overfocus on it
to make your political point right now and
to undermine what allows us in our minds
to push back against the government like they
all do with different flavors.
But that's all he's doing right there, guys.
The reality is pretty clear. Inherent, meaning that
it is there whether or not you decide
to pass a law. What you could also
say is god given depending on your personal
view. Right?
It's just it's a in logic and intelligence
are having a comeback, guys. Just give it
we need to make that the case.
And target Sunnis, Bahais,
Jews, Christians, and other religious minorities. Just radically
incorrect for 70 reasons, but we're not gonna
get into it right now. Do it because
they believe that they understand what natural rights
are from their creator. You know, who also
is actually literally doing that? Israel. But we
won't get into that because Tim Cain's a
liar.
So the statement that
our rights do not come from our laws
or our governments is extremely troubling.
Now the real point, as I already made,
is simply that regardless of him knowing that
or not or or thinking it's crazy, he's
wrong. As TrueStreet Media rightly points out, it
is an it is literally outlined in almost
everything we have that represents this
inherent,
god given,
shall not be infringed. Like, it's just but
here he is going, no. We can just
legislate those things away.
You know what? I'm sure you know why
by today. If you watch this show, you
know why.
Insane, guys. Now I wanna play something for
you.
It it is five minutes, but I really
want you to make sure you watch this
because it's really well done. Greg Reese does
it, and this is pretty contentious. I mean,
for those that are may you know,
depending on where you are in your view
of things today,
as always,
anything, no matter how crazy it is, should
not be out of the realm of you
should not be you know, you're not allowed
to question that. Question literally everything. That doesn't
mean assume everything. But no matter what's going
on, you can look at an event and
go, could they have lied about that? Yep.
That's per that's all you're
obviously, you should ask that. Could they have
faked that entire thing? Yeah. Maybe the 1%
possible. It's still obviously possible, and you should
ask that.
Christchurch
shooting.
We covered at the time.
This to me is more more than just
this one example and the conclusion he comes
to with very easy to understand evidence,
but more so about
how our governments faith things.
It just is the way this works, guys.
And it it's, you know, it's amazing we
can be at a point where our own
governments can call things conspiracy theory and, like,
talk about the hoax and, like, you know
for example, COVID nineteen and a conversation around
lab leaks and whatever. Whatever you think about
the the way that the evidence ended up.
It started where a lot of us were
like, that's interesting. Here's the government's history. We
should be wondering whether they're involved. And they
were like, fake news, conspiracy theory, left and
right. And then all the time afterward, clearly,
that's when they wanted to plant that idea.
And when now the evidence doesn't really support
it, they come back and they plant that.
The whole thing they were calling fake the
whole time. It's just it's about control
in every possible way, in this case, the
narrative. And so
they're clearly fake information. They fake entire events.
Their history is rife with this. And so
all I want you to see through this
is this is going on to this very
day. This was 02/2019.
We saw another example of the, buffalo shooting
in February,
'22, I believe, both of which had the
Azov movement symbol. We'll show you in a
second. You know, there's all these very clear
overlaps. So the real takeaway
is just that our governments and, you know,
including Israel, which is very clearly involved in
this,
manufacture,
instigate, and outright fake entire things. It is
the way this works, and you can't anyone
out there who's, like, outraged by that statement,
I'm not saying we should assume it in
any case, but if you out don't think
it's the case, then you're just flatly wrong.
You can prove that the government has faked
events just like this. Now whether you think
this is the case, that's up for you
to decide. So great video here by Greg
Rees, and then we'll get into
the points about Israel that I think our
report failed to miss. And then we're gonna
get into the meat today of Maxwell, Epstein,
and Pfizer shots in Stargate.
Recognized
as an expert witness by the courts,
Gareth Jacobs
has fourteen years of experience as a digital
forensic analyst
with six years dedicated to service within the
New Zealand Police.
In 02/2019,
he performed a preliminary analysis
on the Christchurch
mosque shooting video
and found several discrepancies.
Jacobs
submitted his report to the president of the
police association,
but never heard back.
The live streamed video in question was declared
an objectionable publication
and made illegal in New Zealand on 03/16/2019.
In August
2022,
Kelvin Alp and Hannah Spier of CounterSpin Media
were charged by police with possession of the
mosque shooting video. In hopes to have the
order overturned,
they hired Gareth Jacobs to do a full
examination
and provide his expert opinion in court.
In order to accomplish this, they had to
travel to a country where this video is
not illegal.
The forensic video analysis report was released on
August 23 and shows compelling evidence that the
video is not genuine.
At three minute nine seconds, when examining the
face size, skin texture, lighting, edge artifacts,
perspective,
and color balance, the face appears to be
digitally altered or inserted.
At five minutes zero seconds, the driver is
seen in the rearview mirror, and it's a
different person.
At six minutes four seconds, the vehicle's registration
plate, KSH90,
is shown.
A search of the New Zealand Land Transport
database
yielded the result.
Information on this vehicle is not available.
Please apply in writing to the New Zealand
Transport Agency. Comparative testing consistently produced either registration
information,
consistently produced either registration
information or indicated that the plate is not
found. The KSH90
query was the only exception.
At six minutes twenty six seconds,
a man on the street in front of
the target makes eye contact with
the alleged gunman for two seconds,
deviating from typical behavior when confronted with a
threat.
At six minutes forty four seconds, the gunman
fires nine rounds into the open doorway.
The lack of recoil and the sustained control
and accuracy
while shooting from the hip
suggests that the weapon is not a functional
firearm,
but rather an airsoft replica.
The positioning of the bodies, the absence of
visible injuries, and the lack of blood stain
patterns are all inconsistent
with a genuine
firearm incident.
At six minutes forty eight seconds, the gunman
moves up the hall to an anomalous magazine
laying on the floor seemingly waiting for him.
Between six minutes forty eight seconds and seven
minutes seven seconds, the gunman inexplicably
fires 57 rounds out of a 30 round
magazine.
At twelve minutes fifty seconds, the gunman fires
three rounds through the front windshield.
The glass stays intact. But at thirteen minutes
twenty seconds, he fires one round through the
passenger window, and it shatters.
Jacobs determined that this is the only actual
firearm used in the video and that it
was loaded with blanks.
Throughout the entire video, all faces are obscured.
There is no visible trauma, and all weapon
impacts at the mosque appear to be caused
by airsoft
BB rounds.
People may have died
somewhere that day,
but not in this video. And the only
reason for the government to outlaw it is
because they are complicit
in hiding the evidence.
With no photos,
video,
social media, or friends,
we are supposed to believe that Brenton Tarrant
was a 28 year old physical trainer
traveling the world.
According to Russian and Syrian intelligence,
Tarrant served in Southern Syria with Al Qaeda
and has been on a watch list since
2012
as an Israeli trained assassin
who failed his mission to assassinate president Assad.
Terrence'
Jewish family
immigrated to The UK from Palestine in 1948,
and he was 42 years old at the
time of his trial.
Greg Rees reporting.
It's a great job.
Now
for those, you know, comments, the chat, and
so on, I mean, yes. As far as
I'm concerned, you know, this Reese is doing
this for a very clear reason. Right? It's
just it's it's important. The reason that I'm
showing it today, It very clearly connects with
a lot of what's going on, and it's
and and we have to place those events
with what's happening. So to the question, yes.
I'm I'm far as I'm concerned, all these
things were this is not he wasn't breaking
this information. He's trying to juxtapose it in
a way that connects this with your mind
with what's going on today. And so, yes,
it's it's been shown to be manipulative
manipulated in a lot of ways from the
moment this started. And, yeah, Max Egan from
one of the earliest people on this conversation
very much deserves credit for that. And so
but I'm not gonna go I'm not here
to go through
the nuance of the story. I'll include these
links and articles so you can go through
it because it is rife with overlaps. I'll
make some points to connect, like, obviously, the
writing on the I mean, think about how
just crazy it is, how consistent that's become
with the weird similar writing, the white writing
on the guns and the manifesto
and the, you
know, to what degree you think it's possible
they all just emulate each other? I mean,
it's it's up to you, but I find
that really hard to believe that it can
you know, it shows consistency for other reasons,
I think. But this was from 2039.
Funny look at the other other titles, by
the way. 2019. Israel bombs 100 targets in
Gaza. Imagine back when that was huge news
because or at least, you know, I hate
to even make fun of it, but it
disgusts me. FBI Clinton deal exposed.
Nothing happened about it, though. New the New
Zealand shooting. So we go through a lot
of information. In this episode,
this one was from 2019 in March. Police
drills before New Zealand shooting. You know? So
already kinda calling out the precursors of the
similar things. Mainstream media journalists in Venezuela exposed
false US narrative. Nobody cared, though.
02/2019, March 18. US says at least a
thousand troops stay in Syria. Right. But, anyway,
Christchurch censorship, and this was around using this
with what one of the points he was
making right there. And a lot of the
just getting rid of the video, going after
them because they have it, like, set in
many different ways, these things come together.
And this one was from 2022.
This was about the Buffalo shooter who was
linked to the Azov movement. And I just
wanted to reiterate the point that it was
also the same symbol, the sun, from the
Azov movement point that was with the New
Zealand shooter. Now you can link these back
to obvious groups, which you can see in
the video he made clearly that this connects
back to an Israeli entity. It's not hard
to see how these things work. The point
is that there's overlap to this. There is
a link. It does connect for an obvious
agenda. When you look at what's happening today,
it's kind of easy to see where this
goes. Now back when, you know, it you
know, I don't know. Let's just even say
02/2019.
A shooting like this happened, and you you
get the similar concerns, which are right things
to ask, not assume, but ask. Could this
be about gun control? Sure. Could be. Could
this be about, you know, surveillance? Yes. Possibly.
Now the question is,
it really just wasn't about all of those
things. You could ask it. You know, it
it's hard to know for sure.
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
It's always there. And I think the point
is that these things are used in in
ways they can in the moment. Individuals have
different agendas. But if you stand back and
look at how it's connected, clearly, this is
what it's all about.
Building the justification for surveillance, for restrictions of
rights,
any different way they can.
It's hard not to see this. And, of
course, I said, Buffalo shooter linked to the
Azov movement as the clumsy vanilla ISIS agenda
stumbles forward. I genuinely think that that effort
didn't work.
They they clearly tried. I mean, it was
pushed even they even stated that flimsy statement
vanilla ISIS on the news or rather the
corporate media. The point though
was that this is it didn't happen really.
Right? It was supposed to and maybe it
still will, but this intersection, like, now would
be a good time for them to do
that in their mind. But this this intersection
between the Iranians'
extremist they want you to claim are coming
for you, the Hamas' extremists they claim are
coming for you, and then, like, MAGA,
who are disgruntled with, I guess, now being
in power. So that's probably wouldn't happen. But
then with Biden is why that made sense.
Just a thought on the side of that.
But keeping all this in mind, some quick
points about Israel that I think are very
relevant to show you the entity we're dealing
with and what they're capable of. But how
both of these things relate with the larger
picture we're gonna paint as we go forward.
Now trying to do this reasonably quickly because
we'll come back to this more in-depth in
a pre next coming shows. This I didn't
want you to see. This is new evidence
presented at the United Nations, And we just
did a whole point about the the really
disgusting reality of the prevalence within their own
society and how it's gone from 2012
and almost every single year as it gets
reported, the rape and sexual abuse within the
IDF against women just continues to get worse
and worse. From you know, one report was
one in six. Two years later, it's one
in three women in the IDF saying they've
been raped.
Nobody seems to care. Women saying, now these
days, they don't even file the reports. They're
not even investigating anymore. And that one of
the hostages that came back,
detainees technically because she's IDF,
who
claimed she was not abused while she was
in Gaza, but despite the fact that they
lied about that, has now since being back
testified that her trainer raped her and drugged
her and then raped her while she was
in Israel.
Nobody cares. They're just they're they're saying she's
lying. They're ignoring it.
That's all happening right now. Think about how
insanely inverted that is. So keeping that in
mind, on top of the the rapes and
the said team in camp, which is where
this first discussion comes from, this is what
Israel's
power structure is not just allowing. It seems
it's driving into reality.
Was taken to Sudeik Imaan, and she was
note searched over and over again and filmed.
And then she was raped twice
by Israeli male soldiers,
two of them at a time, while videotaping
her. We have also one testimony of a
woman who was also taken she was also
she says she was also raped by an
inspection device by a female soldier
more than once.
They insted the inspection device in her rectum.
We have also one testimony of a woman
saying that she was strip searched, and they
would beat her on her behind, and they
would humiliate her in front of each other.
Most of the women also who were taken
from Gaza, West Bank, and Jerusalem said they
were beaten on their genitals, which is which
has made us any to conclude that there
must have been a directive that's been given
to the Israeli army to treat women in
such manner because Which is which has actually
come out for many doctors. Even IDF members
have testified to this who are whistleblowers.
Whether it's murder, whether it's abuse, they're being
told to do this. That's come out many
different ways. You have doctors saying they're literally
aiming at their testicles for target practice.
It's actually blowing my mind today how much
evidence like, I mean, like,
sort like,
a primary source material, like, from people who
literally watched it and testified to it in
their documentation.
And still, we can't I mean, well, I
think we've come to a point where we're
literally talking about
everybody with a brain and that care to
look and then lying Zionist and partisans. That's
who we're that's the divide right now, which
can't be that many at the end of
the day. This stuff is so disgustingly clear.
It's happening every day. Jerusalem, you're treated by
completely different law enforcement. Oh, my point was,
though, it's West Bank she's talking about. In
some cases, West Bank. Now despite their lies
and pushes, there there's
element overlaps, the reality, even according to Israel,
there's no there's not Hamas presence, not in
earnest like they're talking about in West Bank.
There's no real there's no justification for any
of this, but even their false justification does
not even come close to applying in regard
to the West Bank. And they're kidnapping people
and raping them in prisons from the West
Bank too. Your government doesn't care. They support
it. That in
or in the West Bank. But all these
women said they were beaten on the genitals.
And I could just add on, about the
women who were forcibly disappeared in.
Like I said before, it was usually as
they were fleeing south through the safety corridor,
they were abducted at the checkpoint.
Many were taken to the Zakim
detention center and then Negev detention In case
you missed that, so as they were going
in the place they were told to go,
right,
voluntary
migration. So they follow because they know they'll
be killed if they don't voluntary
migrate.
And then they grab them and rape them
or murder them or whatever number of other
things are happening alongside that.
Center altogether in one large hall forced to
strip completely naked and just sit in this
hall, the woman with the amongst each other
and the men amongst each other. And it's
also been reported and known that, Israeli civilians
are invited to come to this detention center
and mock the Palestinian prisoners while they're naked
for Think about how crazy that is. So
that's the that's the the real like, the
the and this is like sitting on that
that cliff and watching them bomb Gaza and
drinking beer and popcorn. That's a publicly known
thing.
There's a that's not everybody. That's important. Not
every Jew, every Israeli feels the same way.
It is a minority, though, when you can
prove, but it's not all of them. And
clearly, though, it is a large portion of
their society, and that's a big deal.
But she wants it's not just the idea
of the like, so understand too. From the
culture they're talking about, it may not matter
to you as much to to be made
naked and be around men, but it's severely
more important to people in this culture.
And but let's be clear. On top of
that, they're also raping them in plenty of
cases. So it's just it's it is a
really large example, and it goes well beyond
this one testimony or these two testimonies. It
is documented from human rights groups like Beth
Salem, an Israeli human rights group. But these
things don't matter apparently because we're all anti
Semites because we see the facts. Photograph them,
and and watch them as if it's a
a zoo. So that's something that we've seen.
Also, when it comes to checkpoints, like I
said, it's it's where the sexual violence happens
and it goes unreported. So we have a
testimony
of a a teenage girl who was made
to undress a man
in because he refused to undress. They made
him they made her undress him even though
she's not related to him. She doesn't know
who that man is.
And while being searched and touched and molested
on their breast and and on their on
their genitals as well.
It's just
rife.
And, you know, so, again, not just doing
that because there's some sick person, but inviting
in all of their community to laugh at
them while they do that.
You know, you know this is happening. It's
been documented. They've been celebrated on their ridiculous
corporate media. Well, here's a doctor we're just
talking about. The cradles are simply highlighting another
interview he gave. He's I've been I've been
pointing at Nick Maynard since the first week.
Where are there so many months of this?
From October 7, which is really in the
midst of an on you know, seventy six
year genocide.
Palestinian boys shot the testicles as target practice.
Nick Maynard from Oxford University has said this
is something he's personally I mean, he's this
has been he's been testifying to this. I
don't have to play all the videos again.
You know? The reality of what he's watched.
Going back to Al Sheifa or even
and I'm telling you, he can personally attest
to there is no Hamas member there. They're
lying about what they're doing. He was literally
involved. He was there inside the hospital, but
nobody cares about this who wants to lie
to themselves.
Double Down News simply
add to the point. It's just I've seen
at least two of the examples. I didn't
know there were four of them. Not a
single mainstream newspaper or broadcaster has said a
thing about Israel
carving the Zionist Star of David into Gaza
into the ground.
Now one. Now that's on top of the
fact that we've seen now two examples. One
is before October 7 of a person getting
branded with a star of David on their
face
or their forehead.
Proven.
They've even followed up, and the guys got,
you know, in trouble, but nothing actually happened,
which is usually what happens in a Zionist
society.
Not a secret. And you can look at
the pictures for yourself. They're destroying people's lives
then then bulldozing a a Zionist star of
David. It's not a Jewish symbol. Zionist symbol.
You can be mad about that all you
want. It is a fact. You can look
it up. Israel can ethnically cleanse an entire
pop people and raise their everything to
the ground that mark their territory in a
show of racial supremacy and not a peep.
It's
crazy.
Of course, little Rubio
announces sanctions against,
NGOs
documenting Israeli war crimes. Now, again, just because
they're Palestine adjacent or support Palestine, they're terrorists
today. That's how stupid this has gotten. Oh,
Venezuela, they claim they have drug terrorism.
Okay. See, you know, oh, guess what? You're
on the wrong side of history. You're you're,
you know, in a that's that's the wrong
way to say that. My point is that,
you know, quick that becomes right? Remember when
you were a red hat, you were a
terrorist?
Oh, how quickly you guys could ignore the
obvious. Well, see, it's because the Johnsons and
the rest who don't care about that aren't
they they know it's not gonna come back.
They're not protecting their side. They're protecting their
golden goose.
The reality is if they can call somebody
arbitrarily terrorists and execute them without any due
process, due diligence, anything, they can do it
to you too. Just like they did with
people in the beginning of the immigration push,
and they're still trying.
It's it's it's wild. So in this case,
it's sanctions, but at the same point,
it it's and they're not even trying to
hide it. He says, today, the Trump administration
is sanction sanctioning three NGOs.
One some of you probably haven't heard of.
One you probably had is the Palestinian Center
for Human Rights for assisting in the ICC's
illegitimate actions. Oh, okay. So not like they
were out there doing terrorist things. They were
simply assisting the ICC, the international community,
investigating Israel's crimes. He said that's what's going
on. So then you get morons out there
who go, they're terrorists because they're brown? I
mean, it prove show me a terrorist activity.
You know, it just the the game is
they support Hamas, therefore, they're terrorists. It's just
lazy.
Not even people who support Trump are even
buying this anymore.
It's it's about sides, guys. And so here
he is
doing his job, which is not something
literally anti American action.
Zachary Foster says, why are so many Israeli
leaders desperate to make themselves look and sound
like Nazis? This is one of the most
powerful people in Israel,
Smotrich.
2025,
quote, we can expose Europeans' hypocrisy.
They love the Gazan so much when they're
stuck here with us.
Hitler, 1939.
The whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for
the poor treatment Jew tormented Jews, but remains
hard hearted and obdurate when it comes to
helping them.
It's the same
lines, guys.
There this is not this is like a
this is just an overlap. There's many examples
of Israeli politicians saying we need to do
to them what the Nazis did to Jews.
They're literally saying that. If I that may
sound impossible to you, but it's simply there
if you just look. These people in the
Knesset are lunatics.
The White House.
This is what Trump actually says. This is
my last warning. There will be no there
will not be another one. Oh.
Yeah. We've heard him do that a lot,
and rarely has anything happen. It's this big
you know, you can't keep blustering like with
Putin and then never do it. It doesn't
mean anything. This is for you. This is
for the morons on Twitter who go, yeah.
Trump's a badass. That's what it's for.
They laugh at him in the world when
he does stuff like that, and he probably
knows that. He knows that his most important
thing is to trick you people.
He says, everyone wants the hostages home. Oh,
that's what we're talking about. Everyone wants this
war to end. Clearly, you guys do not.
And it's the same old tired conversation. I
don't wanna waste time on this. I feel
like we're literally reporting this to a world
full of people who know and a bunch
of Zionists who have too much power who
are going, you're a liar. You're a racist,
who control far too much. That's what we're
talking about here because the reality is he's
literally pretending, like, yet again, Hamas is the
one violating the deal. Hamas is the one
refusing the deal. It's just simply not true,
and it makes me sad that we're still
here. Here's what Rubio said again. This is
blinking. Rubio, same thing. They are doing the
same exact thing. Yay. Surprise. Yet again, they
are the same thing. Left and right, they're
doing the same thing. Remember all the big
talk in the beginning? Ending the war on
day one. Ukraine, day one. We're gonna ex
do this and do that. All the things
Democrats didn't do, and then what they do?
The exact same thing a lot harder. Stargate,
self amplifying shots. It's it's mind blowing how
people can be so blind to this or
so,
like, transparently
self serving.
Like the people we list off all the
time who are out there going rah rah,
whatever Trump just said, despite the fact that
that it makes them look like a clown
because they were just telling you that wasn't
supposed to happen. Epstein is just very transparent.
Here's what Rubio said.
By the way, let me tell you something.
The minute the day that the French announced
their thing, there's the thing they did,
that day, Hamas
walked away from the negotiating table. They
Incorrect. Immediately
increased their demands and Incorrect. And walked away
Incorrect.
And and stopped negotiating
So that we also warned that that would
happen, and and it did. So No. Didn't.
But sometimes, you know, these guys don't listen.
They do what they're gonna do because of
their own domestic politics, which is fine. But,
but these are consequences of that.
Right. Right. So even if it was telling
the truth, the consequences
like, it's just amazing that so more genocide
then because you pouted and walked away. Like,
there's no way you spin this and don't
look at them like they're
like, on puppet strings, guys.
You really think Rubio's in charge of damn
near anything? These people are being manipulated.
I think that's transparently
obvious. Like, do you think they would be
doing the things that you know make them
look stupid? The things that you know you
didn't want that they then turn around and
say, you all asked for this? Like, you
guys, you must know. That's clearly counter to
his personal political interest.
Unless
his only political interest is doing what he's
told by the people who actually pay for
it.
Just a thought. Not saying we can prove
exactly that other than the reality of the
obvious finances you can prove that most of
them are taking to tie back to one
very clear country. Jeremy Scahill says this is
completely
and demonstrably false because it is.
You know, it's it's just that clear. It
has been from the very beginning. Hamas submitted
its response to Witcoff framework on July 23.
And
we talked about this already. A day before
France developed its letter to the Palestinian Authority
saying it would recognize
a Palestinian state in September. Right. Oh, so
that thing that France did, that thing, that
thing. Oh, you mean declaring that they should
recognize Palestine? That the thing you're brushing off?
These they're just so childish.
And it says The US and Israel then
enter negotiations.
Alright. I've said that in the wrong tone.
That was Jeremy said the point is that's
that ultimately, The United States
pushed away.
Just look at that every time because Israel
wants that, and largely is because of Netanyahu.
So the bottom line, they have violated this
every single time from the very beginning, and
you can prove on the on the, what,
the eighth or the ninth and the October
10.
Hamas offered full exchange for everybody, wanted to
end it, Israel said no. And they've done
it every time since.
Anybody honest is already aware of this. And
that's what I said earlier. The White House
comes out and says that, and I'm like,
look. This is how dumb they think you
are. They're saying you're a moron, and we
think we don't think you're smart enough to
read past the first sentence of anything. Just
they're lying. Hamas did it. Everyone's supposed to
follow along. And we know I mean, they
must know that we know this, like, as
a majority
because that's clear around the world, and yet
they stand there and lie anyway. Again, that
shows you that their interests are not about
you, but whoever they're working for.
Harrettes reports that the IDF commander who declined
to take preemptive action after receiving advanced intelligence
on October 7, quote,
was also the officer who initially approved the
festival on Tuesday of that week. What a
coincidence.
So you mean the festival, they moved last
minute to be right in the line of
where they knew this would happen, but they
totally didn't know what's going on even though
they were warned about it many, many times,
was also the guy who
declined to take action when it most you
know, it's just so stupid, guys. Everyone
sees this at this point.
Hannibal directive. I mean, these aren't secrets, guys.
I mean, the corporate media in some ways
have talked about these things. And then when
they they do their usual ridiculous tap dance
and don't really cover it, that's when everybody
ends up finding artwork, and they recognize how
clear it is. Here's Horace. It's right there
in front of you. The guy who turned
down the evidence was the one who moved
it one of the many different overlaps of
this. It's not just one person.
On top of that, Google and YouTube have
signed a $45,000,000
deal with Israel to run Hasbara ads.
That's that's their you know, that's not even
like a propaganda. That is the term they
use. It's meant to be not a bad
word, but it is. It's them lying to
you. It's like saying US you know, the
same thing The US anybody does. Any government
does this. They wanna control the way you
view a situation. Their hasbara, though, is just
what you become accustomed to since October 7
even though it's been there the entire time,
and it's bad. And these people are now
funding these massive platforms who they know the
world sees what they're doing, and they don't
care because there's something else happening. This is
part of this shifting
of the control structure, in my opinion.
Nine seven two magazine, Israeli intelligence data,
militants,
which by the way is a flimsy term
that means whatever they want it to mean
in the first place, but even that
militants account for only one in four
gods of detainees.
So even with their completely abstract definition that
pretty much can stretch wherever they want, even
then, their own intelligence data shows that only
one in four are actually anything associated with
Hamas.
Three and four are civilians.
Think about that. They know that. Their data
shows that this Israeli platform and, additionally, The
Guardian and another Israeli platform also found the
same thing.
But who cares, though? Right? Because facts don't
matter because Trump said. You know? That's that's
how stupid this is. They know what they're
doing, and they've arrested a whole bunch of
innocent people with no charge who are,
I mean, think about what's going
on. Melting away in there with no food,
forced to eat dry rice with no water,
and are being raped and tortured, which is
what we're hearing from people that are coming
out looking emaciated with bird holes in their
arms, missing an arm. This is not a
joke, and this is what they're telling you.
The evidence from their data shows you that,
and yet we're being run by Zionists.
Pretty easy to see, I think.
Mary, Mary Ove from September.
Or, again, I think she might have that's
I I thought that's what she was before.
I could maybe she I should look into
this. I keep I always forget after the
show.
She doesn't say that anymore. I I could
be wrong remembering it too. I was pretty
sure she was. Let's just it's a senior
analyst at on Israel Crisis Group, contributor to
New York Times. So she says,
this is not a map of what Israeli
government is proposing because that's what they're saying.
This is what we're gonna do soon. This
is actually a map of what it's already
doing. And that's what's so insane about this.
Not only what's insane in the first part
is that they're even pointing to something that
we know is that
in the beginning of this, they would have
lied about because it was illegal, and they
know you would have been upset about it.
But now they're going, that's what we planned
to do. But the reality is they've been
doing this well before and are currently doing
it now. The map presented by Smotrich,
right here, proposes Israel's annexing of 82%
of the West Bank.
82%
of a location that is I mean, there's
nobody in the world who did other than
Mike Pompeo who said it wasn't necessarily
inconsistent with the law. That's the most you've
gotten. Everybody else acknowledges seizing land in the
West Bank is illegal, and they've been doing
it the entire time. And don't forget, Trump
told them they could.
Mary Al Adelson paid him to do it,
that he's he that was one of the
agreements in regard to Trump letting them violate
that last deal that he said was gonna
end the war, that they would be able
to keep annexing the West Bank. It was
all on the surface, guys. We are reporting
it. But, of course, not none of the
mainstream alternative media big time journalists out there
breaking all the stories. Look at what they're
doing,
and they're literally showing it to you.
As Salrad, nothing to see here. Just Israel's
defense minister threatening a plague on of firstborns
on the Yemenis. You know, the starving population
that's been in, you know, like,
abject with poverty and and famine for decades.
Like, literally, almost I mean, this point, probably
close to two decades. And he says, the
Houthis are firing missiles in Israel again. A
plague of darkness, a plague of the firstborn.
We will complete all 10 plagues.
These are the people in control, guys. That's
insane.
These are religious Zionists,
and they're literally threatening a plague on their
sons. I mean, the idea is whether it's
just rhetoric or not. One, it shows you
all this religious religious fanatic, the same thing
they were just talking about in regard to
Iran even though it's not the reality today.
And on top of that,
that they're talking about a genocide and all
all and against the Yemeni people who are
the only group in the world who's acting
legally in regard to the
international
reality of, you know, ICC, ICJ, and the
reality they're supposed to be stopping what Israel's
doing, not just letting it happen and attacking
anybody who's trying to stop it.
It's very clear.
I was hoping that would pop up.
And now I've I've I've a meme that
I shared before, you know, that showed what
they want you to think are pirates and
then who the real pirates are. And it's
obviously Netanyahu and Trump, and it's just pretty
disgusting. Last tweet,
the one I played to
start. Now I really don't I can't believe
this hasn't gotten enough attention.
This is these are military people protesting Gaza
or rather the genocide.
And they're being arrested
by this by the just they're being arrested.
The current administration.
So I don't know how you misunderstand this.
I said, winning? America first? Like, these are
people
that are veteran or rather per current military
who are simply protesting
a genocide,
and they get arrested. I mean, make sense
of it for me, guys. How is this
America first?
Megatron says the US military arrested two of
its service men protesting The US backing of
Israel's genocide.
Here's what they said.
Every American sitting at home right now needs
to realize
that you are paying for a genocide.
Take this one. Rise up. Rise up, America.
Rise up. It is time to take back
this country from these corrupt
politicians.
It is time. It is beyond time. We're
going after the. Yeah. Hold on.
This is what for your service.
This is where it actually starts. When the
enforcement arm begins to turn is where actual
change begins.
Revolution.
Doesn't have to be violent. It's where it
begins. The bottom line is that this is
something that's already happened. It's already beginning to
shift. I think that's why a lot of
this is going on, why a lot of
this is happening to push us into a
place where it doesn't matter what we think
anymore.
It's very clear what they're doing. Now they're
look at the comments. Look at what's going
on online.
We gotta take our they're all democrats. That's
all we're gonna get from these mindless people
out there. You know, just
ignoring for the moment how clearly what they're
doing is unconstitutional,
how clearly it challenges it, and how what
they're talking about in the what they're doing,
what they're highlighting
is the look. They're supporting this genocide. They're
encroaching on American rights. They're surveilling people, like,
to the point we've never seen before. They
are building out an apparatus, a system around
this country that will make that the going
reality. They're leaning into the shots that we
don't want. They're doing literally everything that we
thought that we were all told he's got
a mandate to stop.
I just think it's really important to think
about when you have
American military
under the government under the administration
who who is claiming to be the ones
fighting for that,
arresting them because they speak up about a
foreign government and what they're doing in another
country.
You can adore it all you want. The
reality is you're on the wrong side of
history and you damn well know it.
More so because of stories like this.
Now
this story is really interesting, and, like, it's
honestly in in it other than a few
clear points that it really connects to is
a smaller story in regard to what else
is going on in the world. Like, just
what happens to Maximo, for example. You know,
we're we're at a point now where, like,
the real stories for me are the network
that's not actually taken down, that's still going
on. The people that they don't want you
to know it connects to, our entire government,
for example, or the idea of what we're
now seeing through how they're handling this.
So it's a really important way. You know,
there's a lot to it, but you you
you can get kind of mired in the
minutiae of a story like this because, you
know, like I've always talked about. They will
use things like this to keep you lost
in these like, you know, the mainstream stories
that we're all supposed to be immersed in.
I find I found it interesting today that
when I start with this the title that
I did,
both stories being things that I don't think
anyone else is talking about and to see
the lack of engagement, the lack of like,
to start. I mean, it it trickles in,
but it's weird to see the difference. If
I came out and I was like, you
know, whatever the big stories are right now
and put that in the title, I guarantee
we would have 100 people write this, you
know, hundreds in the chat to start
or, you know, whatever the you know,
in the beginning. I just find it interesting
because the reality is I don't think you
know, there there are suppressive tactics that take
place and there are stories and channeling. It's
everywhere you look. Now this story is important.
Now we're gonna we're gonna point to because
of, you know, the reasons I said, and
we'll go through it right now.
The show we did right here around limited
immunity.
It's actually strange to me how little attention
that even got. Like, from the beginning, she
got a deal, a proper agreement right in
the beginning. And it now, again, the the
story we're gonna kind of end with in
this segment is about the DOJ,
the,
was it department chief? I've I've don't I'll
get to it in a second if I'm
wrong about that.
Being caught by James O'Keefe, not the, you
know, what they used to call themselves, but
O'Keefe media now,
and
saying on the record to a honeypot, to
somebody working for him, but is, you know,
a date you know, pretending to be his
date, that they are going to edit whatever
they have, assuming it ever comes down, to
be only showing the democrats,
which
pretty much is exactly what anybody honest has
been telling you. Now, I mean, he could
be lying. He could be wrong. But if
that's correct, it's that they're projecting, you know,
oh, the Democrats are lying and they're because
that's what they're gonna do. And I could
argue probably would be the same thing over
because I think they're all, in some ways,
largely
caught up in all of this. And so
the game is to use it. It's a
it's a hot potato, and they're trying to
let hope it ends up in your hands,
and you're the one. I think that's what
they're all doing. Now you're gonna get people
like Trump's already doing kinda preemptively because that's
what he does, who are gonna say after
the fact that that's what happened. Maybe he's
right. You know how the team's sport politics
is gonna play out. They're gonna say, it's
not true. Democrats are liars. No. They're all
liars.
But the fact that it already happened, they
already got a deal, she's already moved to
a cushy prison,
does have work release despite the the crazy
partisan narratives out there, which is just mind
blowing to me. She's a sexual predator who
you guys were you know, I just you
guys know the story. So the first part
is just to read through this to understand
of what happened thus far, and that's the
the limited immunity she was already given
on
the
where was it? The September 3.
This is just additional information.
And I'll grab this really quickly because I
think it's important just to play it for
those that never wanna admit this kind of
stuff.
So first, this is from people. And I
I this is something that you know, the
idea that Trump is not this close or
connected to him is just such a clear
fantasy.
Jeffrey Epstein kept an eight by 10 frame
picture of Donald Trump on his desk, one
of the survivors' claims. Trump was his biggest
brag.
Now, clearly, we're talking so what's interesting about
this way it's developing is now you've got
people exactly like I predicted. The same people
who've been telling you we're gonna fight Epstein,
we're gonna expose the democrats, We're gonna, you
know, break go after all the pedophiles are
now attacking the victims of those people.
You need to call this stuff out, guys.
Those are the ones who aren't honest. Those
are the ones that will challenge anything. They
have no principles. They'll go along with whatever
their team says they should. Even if thirty
seconds ago, they told you they would fight
all of this. So it's important to think
about how clear that is.
That this case is that they were friends,
guys, and this is not hard to see.
Here again is what he said on the
record with the Daily Beast that he was
Trump's closest friend for ten years. So how
how do you know this?
I that was closest friend.
And that's on the the Fire and Fury
podcast. We've it's very easy to find. It's
been out there for a while.
So if he was his closest friend for
ten years, had a framed picture on his
desk, they hung out many times, many different
pictures. He introduced him to people he knew.
I mean, it's
hard to disconnect that. Now that doesn't prove
crime,
but it obviously suggests that there's something to
be covered up. And the way that he's
acting around all of this, I think, is
pretty clear, guys. Anybody with any kind of,
you know, spidey sense is gonna go, okay,
guys. Come on. I mean, clearly, there's something
weird happening here. And I but I I
kinda wrap my mind around the idea that
he is convinced that somebody will use it
against him, that his name was in there,
and he know it is. He was directed
he told them to take his name off.
Now what we're gonna get into today is
more than just that or taking information out
to protect his people, which has already been
proven to have happened, is the idea that
we're talking about the way that they're trying
to hide more information that in no way
is about victims.
Claiming about privacy is all they're saying. So
now it's about the privacy of your inner
circle who doesn't want them to be seen
being a part of this. You're gonna get
the Jones and the rest, who is what
they've already done. The claimants, they're not breaking
the law, but the Democrats will make it
look that way, so we're gonna hide it
from you. But guess what? The solution is
never show you anything and let you blindly
trust Jones and Trump because that works out
for you. Right?
Here is an article from independent. This is
from the September 4.
Epstein victim who voted for Trump blast president
for calling survivors liars. Now remember, we and
I'll go I'll show you some of the
different points.
There was the
I'll actually go through it in the the,
tabs I've set up that show you the
timing as we pointed out in the show,
remember the last show, about how weird it
was that they were dumping these documents randomly,
which surprise, surprise, turned out to be, as
you all expected. And what we said on
the show, more of the same. Things that
were already public, redacted documents. It didn't change
anything. And Luna was out there trying to
defend it going, how dare you? We're changing
the whole story. And she was lying. And
now even Twitter has fact checked her, and
they just brush her out of the rug.
How many times? How many the the phase
one binders? Nope. Nothing there. Oh, really? Okay.
Here's some more. And then at the edited
information. Oh, that wasn't enough? We got truckloads
coming. And then nope. Never mind. We're lying
about that. Oh, never now it's a hoax.
Now you're all weaklings for talking about it.
We're still talking about Epstein? Oh, wait. No.
Now it's
not a hoax. Here's some more information. Oh,
that's edited. So now we're back to this
hoax again. I mean, it is a comical
story we're watching if it wasn't so serious.
And these are the people who believed in
him,
who believed he was going to fight for
this.
It says a survivor of sex trafficker, Jeffrey
Epstein, who voted for president Trump, has blasted
him for reducing the scandal to a hoax.
Now look, whether or not you wanna make
this a nuance and say as they try,
as we'll get into the FBI informant lie,
I think, because the whole point being that
Trump, is not calling the whole thing a
hoax. He's saying the way they're using it
okay. Point to where he said that.
Jones,
Johnson, in this case, Mike.
Point to where he laid that out. No.
No. I'm not saying the whole thing's a
lie. I'm saying the the Democrats are lying
about me.
You can't keep claiming that's what he means
when he never says that. And every time
he talks about it, he quote says the
whole thing is a hoax. How can you
keep saying the whole thing and then go,
well, no. No. Here's what Trump means doing
your mental
mental gymnastics.
It's just sad.
The reality is clear. He really keeps screaming
the whole thing as a hoax. And even
if you try to force in what they
keep claiming, it doesn't make sense with the
rest of what Trump is saying.
So clearly, there's a miscommunication
here, or they just know their job is
to to make up whatever story makes you
not think Trump is the problem.
Jenna Lisa Jones was introduced to the late
pedophile when he was just 14 when she
was just 14 years old.
And one of the women who shared her
harrowing ordeal at Wednesday's press conference on Capitol
Hill,
which are there getting attacked by all these
gross people in the mainstream alternative media, Trump
repeated his claim Wednesday that the Epstein case
is a Democrat hoax that never ends. That
was his quote.
I voted for Trump, she said, and for
him to say that he what he's saying
is beyond me because I put my hope
in him, and he's supposed to protect us.
Now you can all make this into being
some Democrat manipulation, guys. The reality is these
are the people who voted for him who
believed what he said.
And that's all they're saying is, well, I
was going on what you you told us.
You were gonna do this. Now you're telling
us it's not it's a hoax.
They know better than anybody, and now they're
feeling betrayed. So there there's really no more
to the story than that, guys. You can
understand how clear that part of it is.
Trump is not following through with what he
promised.
Now you get all these other people wiggling
around trying to make it sound like that's
not the truth. Now these people are somehow
liars or democrat agents even though we were
just telling you that they were the ones
we're fighting for.
For him to say that is a joke,
she said. There is no one that is
accusing him of any wrongdoing. Now that's not
exactly accurate, but it's just so the fact
that he's saying it's a hoax. Who are
you who are you hiding for then? It's
a good question. Now in general, I haven't
heard anybody that's, like, coming at it like
Trump is the big villain here. Overall, there
are people who said that they I think
there was a a person who called him
a pedo in this conversation because he was
hiding this information.
Isn't that exactly what the right's been doing
to any democrat who even is accused of
something? So let's let's let's try to be
objective here. Yes. You using those just people
speaking off the cuff at a press conference
probably shouldn't be used to just generally
you know, that's what's happening is that that
one said it. Therefore, all these people are
Democrats now, and Mill Massey and them and
Taylor Greene are all the worst people in
the world. That's what they're doing.
I mean, really think about what a bad
position that is to put yourself in. You
are now calling them bad people for trying
to expose the thing you told us you
wanted to come out.
This is just wild, guys. It really is.
Quote, this is what Trump said. You should
be oh, no. Excuse me. This was, oh,
his is down here. Oh, wrong article. I
think it's the next one. So this goes
on from the survivors. Jones says, you should
be supporting us. You should be backing us.
We spoke our truth, and you are telling
us pretty much that we're lying.
She says, I put my hope in you.
And when I voted for you and you
can't even back us when we need you
the most,
transparency around the Epstein case was was a
pledge, the the independent reports, that Trump campaigned
on in 2024. But when his justice department
and the FBI released a joint memo on
January 6
stating that no further documents in the case
warranted release, that's a that's a flat out
lie, and they've proven that with their follow-up
actions.
And there is no evidence the convicted sex
offender kept a client list, he claimed.
But you see this it's always the game
they're playing with words. Nobody's ever been trying
to argue that we're talking about some little
one, two, three, four, five list. We're talking
about you guys giving us a list of
the people who are involved. You can't claim
they're doing this if there were no clients,
and they've even admitted they have that information.
And now they're coming back around and going,
well, victims? Okay. Explain for me how that
is a victim thing. I mean, you guys
already know this. It's obvious to see that
there's something being covered up here.
Okay? The net on the September 4.
This is just gross, and this is just
a very clear example of how, you know,
feckless these people are. Nancy Mace, Luna, the
entire all of them. The entire inner circle.
These people are blind, like, worse than I've
seen before, but they're all pretty much similar.
Obama, Biden, all these administrations, you know what
they do. They lie for their team. You
know it. We all see it. But it
has been a a special kind of manipulation
this last so many, you know, this last
administration.
Nancy Mace was tearful after meeting with Epstein
victims. Right? So she met them and she
was like, I care. And then she tweeted
something about, no one should ever support Pedos
and blah blah blah. And then the next
day, it's all it's all a hoax. I'm
not Trump.
A day later, she defends Trump who has
called it a hoax. It's just you're a
coward, Nancy.
That's what they all do. They're all grandstanding
fake fronts. They are. They're all out there
trying to make these social points and these
identity politics manipulations, acting like the left's the
only one. They're all doing the same thing.
On the fifth,
Trump says it's time to end Epstein hoax
and tries to blame Democrats for befriending and
socializing
with Epstein. You know, aside from him doing
exactly that. They love to say he pushed
him out of Bar a Lago.
Okay. You can clearly prove that there's overlap
beyond that as many have, including Whitney, but
you can go back and find the long
track record. So if you're gonna go after
them for doing those things, then you then,
I mean, how dishonest when you clearly did
those things. We see this is trying to
set the fake narrative. It's what they do.
President Trump on Friday once again lashed out
over calls from members of both parties. It
is because it's pretty clear.
All it's coming from everywhere.
From both parties, for his administration to release
case files associated with probes into
Jeffrey Epstein. Now as I said in the
beginning,
is there a political motive for people to
like, here's one of two ways to look
at this. Is there a political motive to
get Trump to release this?
Because you know that that he you know,
that makes him look bad? Yes. Does it
make it false to want those released? No.
That's a really stupid way to look at
it. But secondarily,
is it political for them to call for
it even if they if they actually know
that both of them are on the list?
Yes. Because they know he probably won't release
it because they're both you see how that
works? But either way,
them simply calling for it, it doesn't then
make it a problem because Trump doesn't want
that. That means you're for Trump first. Not
America first, not anything other than Trump first.
The reality clearly is that there's political motives
every day for all of these people. Doesn't
change the truth, though.
Sometimes the truth lines up with what they
want. That's just coincidence. That's just, you know,
how it works out sometimes. Writing on true
social, the president said Democrats, quote, did nothing
about Epstein while he was alive except befriend
him, socialize him, and travel to his island.
Oh, you mean exactly like you did as
well every single moment before this? You know,
it's just it's just a lazy argument. Sort
of like his last administration, he also could
have released those files and didn't.
Why?
We just love to start the clock in
Biden's administration because it's easy.
They're all the same thing. This is the
point. In case you're new to the show.
It says and claim that those calling for
transparency in the infamous case are disingenuously
seeming to show such love and heartfelt concern
for his victims. Okay. Probably.
I I mean, this is my point. Let's
just say they don't care about these people
and are just using it to go out
for Trump. It doesn't then that that being
the case does not then invalidate the other
point. It could,
but they're not the the point is clearly
it also could just be that there is
something to be shown there, which is also
like, look. If they hate Trump, they could
lie about it because they hate him. They
could also want the truth to come out
because they hate him. It's the same point.
Don't assume any of it. Simply ask for
the evidence so we can decide for ourselves,
but he's stopping that from happening.
Quote, the now dying Epstein case, the now
dying Epstein case, like, he keeps like, you
know how embarrassing it is that he keeps
pretending like no one cares and drags on
for the week? And he goes, oh, no
one cares and drags on for the week.
And he goes, only the Democrats. And it's
not. That's just very, very desperate.
But now dying Epstein case was only brought
back to life by radical left Democrats. I
I mean, think about that lie to people
who he knows, including the peep the survivors,
his own base, who clearly know that's not
true.
He's literally ostracizing him from his half of
his own supporters
if they care
for another country. That's how I see it.
You can decide for yourself.
It says because they're doing so poorly with
the lowest poll numbers. Oh, okay. It's about
the polling. Right? Because we still believe we're
voting people in. Right? Because we're that's just
even though even even so, the polling numbers,
is that really where we're at right now?
It's
just lazy. While the Republicans are doing so
well, because, look, again, he can't talk about
anything without ending it by going, I'm great,
and I'm doing better anything. Whatever we're talking
about, I'm doing better than they are. It's
just
childish.
Trump then repeated his claim that the entire
matter, quote, is merely another Democrat hoax.
You just can't keep denying this.
At the time, the independent asked him about
the allegations that his Department of Justice is
slow walking compliance
with a congressional subpoena for the documents and
redacting them to protect powerful friends and Republican
campaign donors. In response, he called the entire
issue a Democrat hoax that never ends and
compared it to the decades long process of
releasing files related to the assassination of JFK,
noting that nobody's ever satisfied.
Well, gee, Trump, maybe because there's an overlapping
connection
such as well, I didn't even mean Israel
right there, but such as the point that
you never actually gave us the information. You
know? Like, we gave them blank sheets of
paper. Don't they blank don't they happy with
what they got?
Nobody believed the Warren report. Not even back
when it came out. Just like the cool
report. Just like nine eleven report. Because you're
lying to us, guys. We know that.
So the reality is you keep dripping out
more information about JFK. I interviewed Corey Hughes
about this. It did not change the larger
story. They knew what they were doing, and
so he's just irritated you're not dumb enough
to fall for his lies.
And it says from what I understand, thousands
of pages of documents have been given, oh,
for what you understand, like you're some outside
third party.
Come on, guys. Who falls for this stuff?
But it's really a Democrat hoax because they're
trying to get people to talk about something
that's totally irrelevant to the success that we've
had as a nation. So that's why it's
a hoax. They're trying to throw fake Jeffrey
Epstein claims to stop you from going, look
how Trump look how great Trump is doing.
That pretty much is not the case.
This is so weak, guys. It's painful.
He says that we've had a nation since
I've been president. I understand that we've subpoenaed
that we were subpoenaed to give files, and
I understand we've given thousands of pages of
files.
Okay. That's weak. And I know that no
matter what you do, it's gonna keep going.
He's just trying to manipulate his own supporters
and then finally start like, to somehow think,
well, I'm doing that, so maybe I should
stop because that means I'm being tricked by
the Democrats. How about you look at the
facts then? How about you ignore what idiot
here is saying and look at what's actually
happening? Look at the reality. You're calling for
evidence that you know you should see because
even they told you that. Now you're gonna
stop because he tells you suddenly it's a
different story?
It's just frustrating. It is stupid. What they're
doing is really, really lowbrow, low bar, low
just lowest common denominator.
And, again, for those new to the game,
it's no different than the left. It's just
right now, they're the ones in power.
Now Trump claims the DOJ has done its
job,
really, in response to bipartisan subpoena from the
house. So the fake information we'll show you
in a second, or rather the already public
information that Luna put out,
he wants you to he's for the what?
The fourth time now, he's going, is that
enough? Are you good? Can we put him
to bed? Can we pretend like that was
everything and go forward? He wants that.
Now all claims the DOJ has done its
job in response to bipartisan subpoena by giving
everything requested of them. That's what he said.
Quote,
nobody believes that. He knows that's not true.
The other side's calling it out. His own
supporters know it's not true, and
and I'll show you from even Twitter going,
yep. You only released things that were already
public.
They really are deliberately,
repeatedly
trying to trick you, his team, his supporters,
the people who care about him. They're desperately
trying to manipulate what you see right now.
How does that make you feel?
It says in every the reality in in
members of the committee for both parties have
complained that much of what has been produced
has been in the public domain for years,
and what little is original has been heavily
redacted.
Crazy.
So here is and this is just now
what I think is happening here in regard
to the in the FBI informant,
speaker Johnson kind of just let slip. He
knows what he's doing. He knew this would
get picked
up. Thank you, to Cryptkeeper saying, hey, TLAB,
did you hear that Trump was supposedly an
FBI informant? Now all they're doing here is
playing it fast and loose with the terms.
So look, actually, I should start with this.
Is it possible that he's literally an informant
for the FBI? Sure. But that'd be wild.
It actually makes perfect sense if you wanna
break it down. But
I what I think they're doing, just my
personal opinion, my gut,
Trump very clearly was working in some ways
with, you know,
like, being compliant with the investigation, giving them
information,
happy to speak with you. Right? That's that's
public information.
So I'm willing to bet you he's trying
to do this to to, excuse
me,
to throw in a, you know, a a
monkey wrench
knowing people are gonna grab it and go,
oh my god. What does this mean? And,
really, all he's saying is that he worked
with them. And then when he gets pushed
later about he was the FBI, I just
meant that he could he worked with the
FBI. That how watch as that ends up
happening. They do this a lot. But consider
both. It very well could be that Trump,
just like Epstein, by the way, was an
FBI informant.
Here's what he said. It's very quick.
Not saying that what Epstein did is a
hoax. It's a Oh, and then again, he's
doing the same old tap dance. Right? No.
No. No. Don't listen to what Trump literally
said over 13 times now. Just this is
what he means, wink, wink, he didn't get
to the democrat, you know, and then break
down the 14 sentence explanation to something that
Trump keeps saying. It's very clear. You know,
it's just it's it's it's insulting your intelligence,
but here he is. It's this treat it's
a nuance where democrats are trying to use
this to manipulate against Trump, but but it's
the second part that matters.
And he's not saying that what Epstein did
as a hoax. It's a terrible unspeakable evil.
He believes that himself. When he first heard
the rumor, he kicked them out of Mar
A Lago. He was an FBI informant to
try to take the this this stuff down.
The president knows and has great sympathy for
the women who suffered these unspeakable harms. It's
Except no. Now they're calling him out because
he doesn't care about them. Detestable to them.
He and I have spoken about this as
recently as twenty one hours ago. Right. We
spoke about the thing if we want you
to think. So see? Told you. You know?
It's just lazy. But interesting again, I just
had a secondary thought about this. Listen what
he said. Out of Mar a Lago. He
was an FBI. He believes that himself. When
he first heard the rumor, he kicked him
out of Mar a Lago. He was an
FBI informant to try to take the this
this stuff down.
Interesting. So you could also argue that he
meant Epstein.
There's a thought I had. Right? Because he
he kicked him out from Mar a Lago.
He was an FBI informant
to try to take this stuff down. So
watch them try to spin this to being
Epstein was really the one trying to save
everything. You know? Like, I how crazy would
that be if they contort this into like,
Maxwell and Epstein were actually informants trying to
stop it all, and they got killed by
the deep state. You know? It's like, I
could see something that ridiculous because he was
an FBI informant. That's on the record.
But everyone's picking up that he's saying Trump
is an FBI informant. Because then again and
then it's come out that did, you know,
work with them in regard to, you know,
I'm happy to give you whatever you need,
that kind of work.
So interesting. Right?
But I I think you get where this
is. This seems to be an effort to
manipulate everything.
Oh, and then here here's a little bit
longer. And this is actually this is what
I mean. So this is a really great
point that Derek Derek has an interview with
somebody involved with this going away a while
back who makes a claim I'll play for
you, and then it's being now deliberately misused
by
propagandists like Bennet Johnson who then very clearly
tried to crop out his his logo from
the interview because he's honest like that, you
know, and then use Derek's work out of
context to make a point today. And I'll
read you what Derek had to say. But
this is the same clip, and then it
plays with the second part of it.
That what Epstein did as a hoax, it's
a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself.
When he first heard the rumor, he kicked
him out of Mar A Lago. He was
an FBI informant to try to take the
this this stuff down. The president knows and
has great sympathy for the women who suffered
these unspeakable harms. It's detestable to him. He
and I have spoken about this as recently
as twenty four hours ago. The only thing
that I can say
about president Trump
is that he is the only person who,
in 02/2009,
when I served a lot of subpoenas
on a lot of people or at least
gave notice to some pretty,
connected people that I was going that I
wanted to talk to them. He is the
only person who picked up the phone
and said, let's just talk. I'll give you
as much time as you want. I'll tell
you what you need to know. Okay. Yeah.
And that's a good so I mean, from
an objective perspective, that does seem to give
like, that's a good mark. Right? Not not
always do guilty people readily wanna work with
you, but it also could be the other
way. An investigator would also think, well, somebody
who's guilty might wanna do that to make
themselves not look so. So it doesn't prove
anything, but it's worth considering. And, again, there's
not I I don't have evidence that Trump
broke the law in regard to the Epstein
overlap, but there's a hell of a lot
of evidence to suggest that that was likely.
That's the objective way to look at it.
But this is being used, and I'll show
you what Derek had to say out of
context. And was Or, you know Oh. Oh.
Sorry. I hit the the bar there.
Oh. And was very helpful in the that
let's just talk. I'll give you as much
time as you want. I'll tell you what
you need to know and was very helpful
in the information that he gave
and gave no indication
whatsoever that he was involved
in
anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that
checked out and that helped us and that
we didn't have to take a a deposition
of him. That was in 02/2009? That was
in 02/2009. I can tell you that I
talked to president Clinton I'm sorry, president, Trump
back in 2009
and several times after that. He didn't think
that it was a hoax then. In fact,
he helped me. He got on the phone.
He told me things that were helping our
investigation. Now our investigation wasn't looking into him.
But Right. So funny how that actually works
to his detriment right now, Betty Johnson, because
the reality is he's now now he's saying
it's a hoax despite your weird nuance. But
the real point is about what Derek was
highlighting. So the the guy did say this.
Right?
Here's the
let me do this first. Oh, it's right
here, actually. I'll do this first.
So he writes, this is the most important
video on Twitter right now, of course. Attorney
for attorney for Epstein victims standing outside of
Florida courthouse confirming with no mention of Derek,
of course, despite using his content and then
clearly trying to crop out the logo because,
you know, honest journalism and all.
Because you check the video anywhere else in
the world, guys. The he did they cropped
this video. That's that's intentional, and I think
you know why. They know we called him
out. They know where he left. He knows
that. But it says, attorney for Epstein victim
standing out in front of the Florida courthouse
confirming that Trump was the only high profile
figure who helped him with the prosecution. The
only thing I could say about Trump is
that he's the only person with the same
kind of thing.
Derek says,
you effing POS. Stop using my interview out
of context. This is a small piece of
a larger interview. He talked to Edwards again
today.
Derek did at that when because he was
actually there at the at the DC,
meeting for the survivors.
He says he also admits in his book
that talking to Trump did not involve a
deposition
or any kind of legal oath, which means
Trump could easily lie. It's just him saying,
sharing rumors, which means it absolutely does not
exonerate Trump. And, of course, the real point,
which was oh, you know what's funny? There's
the other one he has.
I'm not gonna try to find it because
he also so he he does what I
do sometimes where he did this, but he
also quote tweeted it and commented on top.
And his point is that the guy now
publicly says that he maybe gave Trump too
much credit. Or now looking at what he's
doing, he thinks differently. Like, that sentiment wise,
that is what's happening today. So this is
Johnson willfully doing something that misrepresented.
Because the second part,
out front there where they're talking, he's clearly
suggesting that Trump is you know, he didn't
say it was a hoax then.
He is now. Right? So this is Johnson
trying to create a a picture using the
reality that sounds as if he's been continually
telling you that Trump was on your side.
It's deceptive.
Like, he's trying to manipulate your view of
this. I just I don't know why more
people can't call that out.
Oh, and here he puts this down here
as the full interview.
So
point was, with this new revelation, it becomes
clear president Trump is the undisputed
hero,
hero of the Epstein saga.
I mean, guys, look. You you wanna claim,
look. He's not guilty. Like, this is, like,
perfect for what they always do. Your best
argument would have been, look. See? He's not
guilty. He tried to help. But instead, you
just can't not take the low hanging fruit.
No. He's the hero.
He tried to save everybody from Epstein. You're
just children. You're so clearly desperate to make
this about Trump the best all the time
that you shoot yourself in the feet all
the time. The reality is that they jaded
this guy, Johnson, Mike Johnson. They all did.
Remember? They said, no way. He's not gonna
be the one. He's he's a rhino.
And then he became the one, and now
they're like, he said it. It's true. You
know? It's like it's just childishly bad. It
really is.
And Scott says, can it get more absurd?
Yep.
So whether Trump's an FBI informant, first of
all, he didn't sign anything that this if
he was, that's news to people. They that's
not that's something that hasn't been released. I'm
willing to bet you it's like we said.
It's either he was actually referring to Epstein
or in in a way to manipulate you,
in a way to make it go in
a way that they're the heroes, which is
kinda what he's doing there,
or he's
misrepresenting
Trump's work with them behind the scenes.
I find that very and and what the
larger point, I feel like it's meant to
pull you away from everything else going on.
Now the real point is to say, well,
hey. If it's all a hoax, then how
can he be an FBI informant for something
that didn't actually happen? Kinda hard. You know,
this is what it looks like to shoot
yourself in the feet. Here's a mask, he
said. You don't get your response to speaker
Johnson right there. He says you've been misled.
He also suggested at one point this week
seemed to suggest that, Donald Trump, president Trump
was an informant to the FBI about Jeffrey
Epstein. Your reaction?
Well, they haven't been misled, and the speaker's
point that the victim's
safety is compromised or privacy
is false. Because when we asked the survivors
at our event, did they support
the legislation that Ro Khanna and I have
introduced, they all said yes.
Now I Now that's an important point. Right?
Because there are I'm sure there are, like
well, the argument is that there are more
victims that aren't necessarily identified, and they know
so and so putting it out. Well, there's
a whole lot of that information, though, that
only pertains to certain people who were on
that stage.
Okay? So they're saying, I don't care. My
name's out there. Put it out. And they
still say no.
You have to realize there's a whole group
of them that are involved with this who
they're so they're claiming, we wanna keep their
names private. They're the ones out there. They're
saying, I'm a victim of Epstein, and I
want this information public.
You this whole thing is is that's why
that aside from the story itself, like I
said earlier, that
these are the bigger parts about this because
it speaks to a much larger problem. These
were Epstein or any other story. These were
government entities, and it's not just unique to
the right. Please. Again, there's always new people
showing up on the show. I just hope
that's clear. Help me on the chat if
there's somebody who's new to the show who
doesn't hear that. It's all of them. But
in this case, it is currently the right
doing this more than the other side, at
least in this context
rather this topic, Epstein.
They're just trying to play you, guy. They're
trying to manipulate you. They're claiming they're protecting
the victims who are publicly identifying themselves, calling
for them to release it, and they're using
them as the excuse to stop this, at
least in many cases.
All I'm trying to say in this point
is that all of them on stage, really
then find them. Release all of the information
that pertains to people involved, clients, everything else
around their stories. That has to exist. Right?
So they're they're just giving you a broad
stroke, no more because victims, even though in
many cases, you can prove it's not even
about that.
So dishonest. And it's actually,
like, especially upsetting and disgusting that it's around
this topic. After everything they did, everything they
said, Cash, Bongino, the whole tap dance.
That Ro Khanna and I have introduced, they
all said yes.
Now
that the victim's
safety is compromised, your privacy
is false because when we asked the survivors
at our event, did they support
the legislation that Ro Khanna and I have
introduced, they all said yes.
Now I don't know if the speaker misspoke
when he said that Donald Trump was an
informant.
The lawyers for the victim said that Donald
Trump had been helpful in 2009
in their case by giving them information, but
being an informant implies some formal connection and
ongoing relationship with the FBI.
It makes you an asset of the intelligence
apparatus. It makes you an FBI informant.
That's a very legal legally different situation. I
don't even know how that like, I have
to talk to somebody about that. What let's
just say hypothetically, he's an eight like, an
FBI informant. What does that mean legally for
being the president of The United States?
Like, it it may not sound that crazy
to you, but if you really think this
out, like, that's a weird overlap,
especially with with now him potentially being implicated
in a massive legal story. It's just very
weird to me. Again,
everything seem I I feel like it's just
a weird head fake.
I don't know what that's all about. I
think the speaker needs to clarify that.
And if it's a hoax, why was Donald
Trump an informant to a hoax? Yeah. Yeah.
Carson. Very obvious point to make there.
So here, same day, by the way, this
is the seventh. This is today. Liz Crokin
comes out and says, today, my friend, Roger
Stone, and I will destroy
the democrats
Jeffrey Epstein hoax.
They've developed in an attempt to take down
our beloved president Trump. That's what it says.
So on the same day, they're out here
going, no. No. No. No. It's it's not
a hoax. He just means that they're lying
and and okay. But here you are going,
it's all a hoax, and we're gonna prove
it. You know, they didn't get the today
talking point. Right? You know, it's like they're
all just lurching out there into whatever. You
know, how many times have we seen Roger
Stone come out and tow the line, go
on his podcast spree, and just lay out
the narrative that literally proves out to be
false? I can't even count.
That's what these people do.
Now Thomas Massie on the September 2
posted on Twitter, it's filed.
Your congressman can now sign the discharge petition
to force a vote on binding legislation to
release the Epstein files.
Right. So clearly, there is more, and they're
pretending it's not the case. Or in some
cases, there's multiple arguments.
Sometimes you'll hear Bonnie the rest go, that's
it. There's not even anything else. You know,
like a week couple like a month ago.
Right? But then they had more, so she
was lying then. You know, it's basic things.
That's the point I make about, like, watching
it for worse. Like, it's not like my
opinion.
You can clearly see when when Bondi said
there was no more that come out, then
they released some more. Okay. Well, you go
then she lied. Or, you know, you go,
she politically maneuver you know, whatever. She was
dishonest. There's no debating that.
Why is the question? So that's the point
I make about somebody. You can prove these
cases where you can literally show here they
could see he tweeted that he knew this,
and here he is lying about it over
here. I'll in these cases, it's just about
demonstrating, like, blatant dishonesty regardless of the reason.
That has to matter. So in this case,
this is out there.
Meaning, there are more, not because of this.
We already knew there is more, but now
it's about how they respond to it. And
and this is you could you could argue
that Massey's out here doing a big political
move, certainly possible. I question that too.
The reality is whether or not it's about
politics, it does does it change the reality
of, like, the validity of it? It doesn't.
We all should demand this regardless of what
benefit you may gain from that happening
or what you don't want to happen or
the detriment that might come from doing so,
you know, for either way you look at
it.
So on the second
and I said this on the last show.
Remember?
I said, this is weird. All these documents
are dumping out right before this happens. Right?
Bennie Johnson. Holy smokes. Oversight chairman James Comer
just broke some major news. Guess what?
They claim, anyway. Alex Acosta is coming in
to testify. Oh, great. Another career diplomat or
rather bureaucrat
bureaucrat is gonna come in and probably tow
the line exactly the way you want him
to. He's the one that said on the
record more than once,
by accident, I argue at least in one
case, that he was an asset, intelligence, both
Israel and The United States, Epstein.
So him coming in to testify, I mean,
in what context? What will that mean? You
why would this guy have any more insight
any more than anybody else? He had access
to the files you guys do. It's a
play, guys. It's a manipulation. And it says
Epstein documents are currently being uploaded for full
transparency and you lie. Lie. And it's gone.
Right? That's exact every time. Because the day
later, it was already being proven that they
were lying about that. We subpoenaed six former
attorney generals as well as Bill Clinton and
Hillary Clinton. Okay. So recognize when they've subpoenaed
them in regard to the Epstein case, that's
not the same as grand juries for Obama
and Clinton, even though they're clearly trying to
mix that together to make
unintelligent people go, look at they're bringing them
in. It's all coming down. Drybunals and q,
and it's what it is.
The reality here is I doubt they even
ever come forward for this.
Watch. I mean, I I'm very doubtful you'll
even see Clinton and Bill come in to
talk about Epstein, but I hope so, and
I hope it actually does, in a separate
context, become a grand jury for any number
of other crimes they should be charged with.
But something tells me that big, big, big
news that Epstein excuse me.
Alex wants you to think is coming is
just a complete lie. And whether he was
played or he's playing you, I don't know.
But this is what they're pushing.
Holy smokes, Betty Johnson says. It's so great.
I can't believe it.
Oops. Where was I?
Okay. Oh, that's right. So on the second.
Right? So Massey says, here you go. Now
we can vote to get it all out.
It's very simple. And they misdirect, misdirect, come
out with all these moving parts, and that
same day come out and dump these files.
And if Paulina, Paulina Luna says, all all
all Epstein files can be found here.
They were just uploaded by the house. Oh,
you mean the files that Bonnie told us
didn't exist? That the rest of you told
us weren't possible because victims?
But no, there's more.
And then, oh, whoops. It didn't say this
then. It says most of these documents released
today were already made public months ago. These
are not new documents.
How just absolutely ridiculous is this? And I
said, all in this case means not all
of them, just in case that was unclear.
It's just so ridiculous.
Okay?
And then people called her out for it
and said, all? And she goes, yikes. Imagine
laughing that victim info wasn't released. No. It
wasn't victim info. You're lying. And now it's
gonna be proven even more if this keeps
going forward. These are all people who are
moment by moment
deliberately trying to manipulate their chief support base.
You I mean, you think that's unique?
They're all the same way. They'll lie to
the Democrats just like they lie to you,
just like the Democrats will lie to you,
just like the lie to their base.
This it just continues to baffle me how
small points like this are not enough.
Like, this should be huge. She got caught
lying. That should be hewn. Doesn't matter. There's
a narrative around it that we're supposed to
consider before we even look at the facts.
And then, of course, other than the fact
that it wasn't even close to all the
information and most of it was old, there's
also some that look like this.
Oh, look. You got the page numbers. Oh,
good.
That's part of it, guys. That's why and
then they say breaking bombshell Epstein files revealed.
That's what they're promoting.
It's a slap in the face. Now this
is even crazier to me. You guys saw
this, I'm sure, on the third. White House
says helping Massey
secure a vote to release Epstein files is
a hostile act. Now if you take it
face value the building of the narrative they've
created, right, so if it's a Democrat hoax,
only when they want it to be, though.
Otherwise, it's not when they don't want it
to be. That means that anybody helping with
this hoax in this section of the conversation
is then, you know, lying and going after
the Republicans for false reasons, so therefore it's
hostile, which therefore means they're they're, you know
you could make it they're a terrorist because
they're insurrection. They're going for the country. Well,
you can see how they could turn anything
they want into whatever they want these days.
It's what they're doing.
Somebody trying to do what they told you
they were gonna do suddenly becomes a terrorist,
and you should be deported to El Salvador.
I'm kind of joking. The reality is they
turned Massey from, you know,
doing what they claimed they wanted into a
hostile act
against
them. I mean, this is cartoonish. This is
not even Orwellian. Like, there needs to be
a new word for stuff like this. He
says they're threatening anyone who helps bring true
transparency and justice for the survivors.
This is a tacit admission the Oversight Committee
data release is woefully incomplete.
It literally says,
helping Thomas Massie and liberal Democrats
with their attention seeking while the DOJ is
fully supporting a more comprehensive file release. No.
They're not.
The what see, this is they're lying about
what they put out. They were hoping that
would stand.
See? And Trump said, we've released everything we're
supposed to in that interview. It hasn't panned
out that way. We could look and tell
they're lying. They were hoping he'd fall for
it for the, what, the third, fourth time?
And now they're saying anybody helping with this
would be viewed as a very hostile act
to the administration.
They're just trying to threaten team players.
Right? I don't care what you believe. If
you do this, you're fighting team.
Don't counter signal the leader.
I just think I'm you're I'm embarrassed for
you if you're supporting this right now.
Again, perfect perfect image. The Simpsons, it shows
Epstein clients behind Abu's counter. It shows Thomas
Massie with the gun shooting at the Epstein
clients or excuse me, Epstein clients, and then
Trump diving in the way of the bullet.
It's just perfect.
Now this was the Epstein,
victims with Massie at the at the,
briefing, the conference.
Sally Agaras just says Epstein victims announced they
will compile their own list of, you know,
pedophiles, sex abusers in regard to the Epstein
conversation.
Now it's amazing. Like, look at Loon over
there going, yikes. How dare you attack the
victims? Okay. You mean, like, you're all literally
doing right now? All of them. All these
major accounts that are going, oh, what? You
can't just release the names? Matt Walsh.
I it's insane to me coming out going,
we'll just release them now. You're about to
lie. Like, you guys are going after the
people you claim. You know, you get it.
I'm just it's just so transparent.
They're attacking you over here for calling out
Luna. You know, it's just
lazy. And you and it really shows they're
out. It shows their strings. What suddenly pulling
back on this? The bottom line is maybe
they're making it up to who knows, guys?
Question everything. But the truth is you can
see the evidence around it. And at the
very least, that them Republicans were the ones
telling you they wanted this out. And now
that they're up there saying Trump is not
doing what he said he would do, they're
claiming they're the ones lying. Now even if
it's the case, the point is then you're
you just change based on what Trump says
that day. But on top of it, in
regard to the names, k. You almost realize
this information is stuff that's already been discussed.
What we're calling for is not people in
a microphone yelling names. How dumb that is.
Not me it it would matter if they
said it because that's their testimony. But for
them to say that's what we're waiting for
is the White House
releasing
documents that they claim they've proven, and that's
the information that we have about the list.
You see how different that source material is
from people standing up on a stage who
will be attacked and dismissed and called out
like it's happening.
So for them to go, why don't they
just say their names? Well, there's obvious reason
why that's not in the best interest of
the way they should go, but sure. Maybe
they could. Maybe they will. There's also the
case, as Derek points out, that many of
them have said their lives are being threatened
for simply talking about this. Regardless of all
of it,
saying that they could just say the names
is like is like a an exchange for
why we shouldn't call for Trump to do
it. It's just selfless,
shameless
self serving manipulation.
Regardless of what's going on anywhere, don't we
all agree that we want the full transparency
of the information? Funny how we've gotten away
from that point now as we've gotten driven
into some partisan divide around the topic that
we all agreed on. As he says, why
won't they just release the names now? Well,
they've said they've been threatened in fear for
their lives. Seems like a valid point to
me.
All and, again, the point is regardless of
whether they're even telling the truth, it doesn't
change that we should all demand that Trump
and everybody else put the information out. But
I'll include this testimony from Maria Farmer that
Whitney discussed from 2020.
Epstein victim, Maria Farmer, speaks with Whitney Webb,
full phone call part one and part two,
where she names
the, you know, UK overlaps. She named Donald
Trump as very clearly being involved,
but it's just her testimony. You can list
it for yourself and decide for yourself. It
has value just like anybody's testimony does.
Now here's Massey.
And and this is Sarah Rose saying Massey
and Marjorie Taylor Greene stood together in unison
with people who held disgusting signs that called
Trump a pedo.
Right? So did somebody come up there and
accuse him of being a pedophile? Not that
I saw.
So somebody behind them in a crowd that
they can't control has a sign that says
he's a pedo, and therefore, now all of
them are bad? What I mean, think about
how lazy this logic is. You won't even
call this logic. Is what he's saying correct
or not? Is it exactly what you were
calling for thirty seconds ago? Yes on both
counts. But because some guy had a sign
that you don't like, therefore, Massey and Margie
Taylor Greene are bad now.
Yeah. Welcome to
kindergarten. So all day today on the fourth,
fake patriots and MAGA pretenders are all over
Twitter demonstrating for you that they've always been
Trump first and never America first. They care
more about defending Trump from insulting signs than
exposing the true depths of the Epstein scandal.
How sad.
Here's one of them, for example.
Cat turd says Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor
Greene on full display. You mean doing what
you wanted? Or you at least what you
what you wanted because Trump told you you
should want it that day? Now he told
you you shouldn't want it, so now you
don't want it? Very brave of you, cat
turd. And it says it's impossible for to
for, for to hate these two frauds anymore.
So why are they frauds exactly? Because they're
doing the same thing that you called for?
But now that Trump doesn't like it, now
it's a fraud? These people are so transparent.
Just just the sight of these backstabbing losers
makes me sick to my stomach. Oh, yeah.
Exactly. It's because they did what Trump didn't
want.
You can't miss this, guys. These people are
clowns. These people are the clowns of today.
They are the ones out there who have
been artificially driven up because it makes everyone
look at the rest of us like we're
all stupid like these people. They are shameless
one-sided followers.
Oh, and Margotella Greene is worse.
How how about we just question all of
them? Because they're all potentially liars, Trump included.
But then look at the information at face
value. Not for these people, though. The moment
you go when when Kyle Rittenhouse was like,
hey. Maybe Trump's not the best on gun
records. They went after him. Said you can't
do that. Even if it's true, hide that
information because we're fighting for the you know,
we're fighting the evil Democrats, so truth doesn't
matter. It's everywhere you look right now.
Just depressing.
Miss Hubert says our side,
quote,
whenever you find yourself on the side of
the majority,
it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain. Exactly.
So he's over here going, our side talking
about it like the sides. We're okay. Well,
clearly, like, they love to be the the
the rebels fighting the deep state or pretend
that. Well, guys, you are the power right
now. You are the majority. Right? Think about
that for a second.
And so here they are defending the status
quo,
finding how rapidly that took place, doesn't he?
I think everyone sees it. Here he goes
again. He goes, seriously? Eff her. She's absolutely
disgusted me now. Okay. So you can show
him supporting her every moment until suddenly she
does the one thing Trump doesn't want anymore
and now she's the worst thing I've ever
seen in my life. Like he's done every
single time. Electric vehicles are the worst thing.
Oh, now they're the best because Elon.
Your children, guys. Your children.
President Dilley says, Thomas Mass, he's a POS.
I just think it's crazy. The guy who
more embodies America first, whether he believes it
or not, It's about what he's demonstrating his
follow through. Look. Maybe it's because he wants
he's an opportunist. Maybe he recognizes it's more
in his benefit to be the guy he
wants pretended to be. I don't care at
this point. It's about outcome. If they give
you what you want and they follow through
what they claim, then then that's I support
that. I mean, think what's what's the material
difference if they just act out a good
person their entire career? I mean, the bottom
line is we should question them regardless
and and and only demand outcome. Prince outcome.
Right? Action and outcome.
So for him to be like, he the
POS. Well, in so what? Did you hate
him before? No. Most of these people were
want these these are the people that wanted
Massey on Trump's administration who now despise him
because all they care about is Trump.
Bill Mitchell says, don't attack Trump over Epstein,
then tell me you're MAGA because you aren't.
Right? Another indication, another example of these clowns
showing you that what MAGA means to them
is team.
No. No. It actually means make America great
again. And if suddenly
it's about only what Trump does, even if
it's not for America, then suddenly you're exposing
that it's really not about America. It's about
whatever Trump says, which is being driven by
Israel, in my opinion.
Don't attack Trump over Epstein even though he's
hiding information. Right? Don't tell me you're MAGA
because you aren't because it's really a team
that you've created. And anyone that goes against
that team is no longer part of it
even if they're actually fighting for America.
You're a useful any to the left just
like Massey.
I I I honestly wonder whether people like
this are just easily manipulated,
and all I have to do is be
told democrat. They go, yes, whatever you just
said, or they know when they're manipulating other
people. The bottom line is
if you say someone's being used by the
Democrats, certain people will
no. No. No. Whatever you just said that,
never mind. I don't wanna be the guy
if it's used by the other side, and
I'll just blindly walk into whatever they're told.
And people that call themselves smart do that.
This is one of them.
I said, all of you honest MAGA out
there suddenly feeling that your own team is
calling you out
just for doing what they claimed prior to
the election they wanted to do,
just recognize that what this shows you.
You were never they were never your team.
Your team are or any nonpartisans
focused on the truth.
Sally Agra says,
if releasing a list of pedophiles is anti
Trump, well, then what does that say about
Trump?
Speaks for itself.
Now this gets especially interesting. I'm not gonna
play I'm not even gonna I'm just included.
You can watch it. It's eight minutes long.
You guys have seen these. It's the it's
the the continuation of the what was it
before? Now I'm forgetting all of a sudden.
It's now it's O'Keefe Media now.
DOJ deputy chief, that's what it was, deputy
chief, admits
government will, quote,
redact every republican
while, quote, leaving all the liberal Democrat people
on the client list, says Ghislaine Maxwell was
moved
to a lower security prison as a benefit
to keep her mouth shut. Those are all
quotes.
Quote, Maxwell, she got transferred to a minimum
security prison.
It's against, as we told you, Bureau of
Prison policy
because she's a convicted sex offender.
I mean so when this would happen around
Democrats,
as you know, the the same people we
point to, it's face value. We knew it.
They're bad. Call them out. Now it happens
against Trump, and they all dismiss it. They
ignore it while he was just saying it
to impress his date. Yeah. It's certainly possible.
It's also just as possible that's exactly what's
happening because it's exactly what they're projecting on
the other side.
That's right in your face. Here here's an
article about it from daily, Daily Beast. DOJ
post embarrassing apology.
See, what's interesting is you could've just showed
this, and so many of them would be
like, that's probably not even true. Just ignore
it. You know, plug their ears, stomp their
feet, look away in hopes that they don't
have to look at it again.
But they even apologized already. Over official caught
in honeypot trap.
Now you want I mean, honestly, a trap
like that no. Yes. People can lie to
impress a date. To me, though, it's it's
it's usually more of an honest trap because
people are trying to you know, you're again,
anybody could lie, but I argue in in
this kind of case,
I actually would be interested to speak to,
like, a detective about this. Like, I would
argue you get more it's, like, almost like
without them knowing you're trying to dig in
to give things that would impress your date.
Like, I I bet you it's more often
than not on the side of the truth.
But you question it. Right? Because there could
be a lie. Always question it. But they
apologized. Attorney general Pam Bonney's department was forced
to do into damage control after a top
justice official was secretly recorded
telling a date that the Epstein files would
be manipulated to protect Republicans.
In a video posted online on Thursday,
Schmidt is his name is recorded telling the
woman that the department would, quote, redact every
Republican or conservative person in those files,
leave all the liberal Democrat people in those
files, and have a very slanted version of
of it of it come out. Now see,
my point what I was saying a second
ago. Now, you know, saying that is it's
dishonest. Right? So you're saying something that is
dishonest.
So the reason I think that this speaks
to honesty in this case, like, that he's
being true about what he's saying, is that
clearly the date, the honeypot, was giving him
the impression that she's a Republican too, and
we hate Democrats. And so he leans into
it and wants to impress her by going,
oh, yeah. We're gonna screw them over.
You know, see what I'm saying? Like, it
speaks to me as an honest even I
and I do argue that's what we're gonna
see from both sides if they can't. So
it just makes sense to me.
Because I don't see why somebody would put
that forward,
risking that they might, like, insult their date
being dishonest unless you thought they were on
your side. You see what I'm saying? And
it's and it's all just my opinion. It's
a he goes on to say, he also
told his date that the decision to move
Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice, Maxwell, to a lower security
prison went against the border prison's policy, as
we reported, because she was a convicted sex
offender, quote, which means they're offering her something
to keep her mouth shut.
There he is.
Joseph Schint.
Schmidt, excuse me.
Very interesting to me.
Now, I mean, guys, it's just there's so
much that's going out. I just think it's
it's so hard not to see what's happening
right now. Don't jump to conclusions. Don't take
my word for it. Just look. I honestly
think that most people are very, very aware
of how obvious this is.
Now this gets even more obvious. So on
top of everything else we already said, this
is from yesterday. The DOJ, so Trump's DOJ
right now, says names of two associates
Epstein wired hundreds of thousands of dollars to
should stay secret.
Pretty easy to see.
The justice department on Friday
asked a federal judge, see, most people don't
see this. It's it's sort of like the
Pfizer thing we're gonna get to. It happened.
The FDA approved it. It just gets no
conversation because it's kept out of the algorithmic
Twitter, you know,
time feed.
The people who are have a vested interest
in keeping the status quo going or pulling
your punches and looking anywhere else despite claiming
they care about all this stuff as RFK
is up there going, we the shots are
bad, and we know it, and you're lying.
Here's another shot we're approving. It's it's just
insane
with stuff like this even. You know, the
this should be a major point, but yet
it's not being pointed to by the liars
who consume the left right paradigm they pretend
is the majority. And so it doesn't get
a lot of attention until people force it
through the conversation.
You know? And what's crazy is this is
NBC News. It's not small. Right? It's out
there. But it's my point is about, like,
we know, I think, today that the corporate
media doesn't actually influence the majority anymore, not
in the sense it used to. It does
because everyone ends up kind of taking cues
from that apparatus
because that's really the only place we have
to get that kind of flow. Right? But
I argue that unless the
screamers in the mainstream alternative media make something
a focal point, it doesn't really absorb to
the majority of the politically invested people in
the world or in the country. Just my
just my opinion.
Now it says they they, on Friday, asked
a federal judge
overseeing the case
of deceased sex sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to
deny a request from NBC News to unseal
the names of two associates who received large
payments from him in 02/2018.
His court documents show that's during Trump's administration.
The justice department cited privacy concerns expressing
expressed by the two individuals
as the reason for not making their names
public.
So there's no victim here, guys. These are
two people that took money from Epstein,
who the judge, after being gassed by the
Department of Justice, has decided to keep secret.
There's no way around that. I mean, I'll
keep reading. The point is clearly that this
is exactly what we're this is the game
of the the victims and and, you know,
whatever they're trying to use. This is exactly
what we're asking for. Epstein paid them
or vice versa. They may maybe they paid
him for something, and that's on the record,
and we can prove their names, and they're
keeping it secret.
Right? This is not some Democrat hoax.
Pretty obvious. Now the first associate received a
payment of a $100,000 from Epstein. The second
associate received a payment of $250,000,
both in 02/2018,
days after the Miami Herald began publishing a
series of investigative stories where victims criticized a
plea deal that he received in Florida in
02/2008.
As part of the plea agreement from 02/2008,
that was Acosta. That was the overlapping point.
Right? And this that Acosta then overlaps with
Trump's administration where he told them that and
that was okay. You know, that they he
was told to back off. Right?
It says, as part of the plea agreement,
Epstein secured a statement
from federal prosecutors in Florida that the two
individuals would not be prosecuted,
which, by the way, clearly implies that they
did something wrong.
So they could be prosecuted
for something.
And Epstein gave them hundreds of thousands of
dollars and made sure that their names would
be kept secret.
Sure sounds like something good. Right?
The payments became public after Epstein was indicted
and arrested in New York in 2019
and asked to be released on bail. Federal
prosecutors in New York filed a memorandum on
07/16/2019
that argued Epstein should remain in jail to
prevent him from tampering with witnesses.
They cited you know, this is before the
payments. Now they cited the payments he made
to two individuals,
which began two days after the Miami Herald
began publishing his stories on Epstein's plea deal,
also known as a non prosecution agreement or
not or NPA.
Prosecutors wrote that on 11/30/2018,
Epstein, quote, wired $100,000
from a trust account he controlled
to an individual named as, redacted, a potential
coconspirator.
So now you can even prove that they're
actually involved with the actual trafficking
and for whom Epstein obtained protection in.
Okay. So if he were still alive, you
could argue that there was some legal boundary
there. He's well,
again, aside from the the narrative being today,
whatever the reality is, and whether he killed
himself, whether somebody killed him, whether he shoveled
away to Israel, the point is that we're
told that he's dead. So legally speaking, that's
the reality. So
now that he's dead in the legal sense,
that shouldn't be a problem. Right? So now
you've got co conspirators who literally are legally
accountable for his crimes of sex trafficking, who
he paid off, who they he got named
removed from the list or from the
current
legislation,
information they had.
As his prosecutors also wrote, the individual was
also named and featured prominently
in the Miami Herald series.
Prosecutors added that, quote, the same records show
that just three days later,
on or about 12/03/2018,
the defendant wired $250,000.
250,000
from the same trust account
to redacted
who was also named as a potential co
conspirator, both of them.
And for whom Epstein also obtained protection in
the NPA.
The prosecutors continued, this individual is also one
of the employees identified in the indictment,
which alleges that she and two other identified
employees
facilitated the defendant's trafficking of minors
by, among other things,
contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with
the defendant at his residences in Manhattan in
Palm Beach in Florida. They're literally covering up
for the people who traffic minors.
That's that's their DOJ who are calling for
this to not be released.
Prosecutors said in the filings that Epstein's payments
may be evidence of efforts to influence witnesses.
It says last month, NBC News sent a
letter asking the district judge, Richard Berman, to
unseal the redacted names, well, because Epstein's gone.
Right?
The criminal proceedings have ended, and the Department
of Justice said in a memo in July,
there would be no additional charges filed against
uncharged third parties.
End of story. Here's a couple of coconspirators
who literally traffic children,
but we're gonna let them go though because,
you know, no reason because, well, you know,
NDAs don't exist anymore because or MPA because
he's gone, but we're gonna let it stand.
But it's all a Democrat hoax though, guys.
Don't forget. Democrat hoax.
That's disgusting. That's right in your face disgusting.
And no lie with Brian Taylor Cohen says,
the Trump administration is halting investigations into child
exploitation
and human trafficking
to focus on more resources on going after
immigrants.
Well, guess what? You are it's not a
new story. You already know that. This is
this person reporting what we were reporting back
in the beginning of this. Why?
And this is Boston Small saying the golden
age of the pedo.
Well, because we already showed you this. This
is Aaron Melnick, the the lawyer for the
immigration council on March 25, at least that's
when he posted it, reporting publicly and citing
his materials. We already showed you on the
show. The Trump administration
pulled funding away from investigating child trafficking and
sexual manipulation and dumped it into going after
largely innocent people with brown skin. They dumped
to El Salvador, who we've now proven were
mostly innocent with no criminal record, mostly here
legally or in the process of.
Now that it's it's crazy. My point is
that you already knew this because you reported
it more than once. Listen to it. He
goes over this in this discussion. I'm glad
it's being called out. The point is on
top of everything else, while they're trying to
tell you they're focusing on this, while they
promised they would stop all this, they're letting
these people go. They're covering up the Epstein
connections and are now have been, by the
way, since this started, pulling funding away for
even going after people like that and putting
it into going after people that Israel doesn't
like or people that are here inconveniently.
You know, ran a traffic light four years
ago and and it has a visa, but
get them out of here.
Makes me sick.
Now on top of all that,
you might have seen the weird, you know,
kind of hashtag winning moment where Donald Trump
sat down with Zuckerberg and Bill Gates and,
you know, all of the deep state Silicon
Valley manipulators.
And apparently, that's a good sign
from all the people that told you that
they were gonna be in chains today.
Again, one of the many examples of these
people just being clowns out there jumping around,
barking seals, and telling you exactly what they
said shouldn't happen is now the best thing
in the world because Trump's winning. It's the
golden age, and he's saving the country and
blah blah blah, even though they're literally doing
the opposite of what they said that was
thirty seconds ago. So this is an interesting
first point. This is from the White House,
08/15/2025.
A running list of new US investment in
president Trump's second term.
This is from last month, cup two weeks
ago or three weeks now.
So just a quick overlap. Most of these
you already know because we made fun of
this when this first happened. You know, $600,000,000,000
investment from Apple. Hooray. I thought they were
the bad guys. Weren't you telling us they're
the problem? You know, cooking all that. No.
No. Now they're good guys because now they
like Trump or at least they're giving The
US money, which makes Trump a good businessman,
I guess. So therefore, we'll ignore that they're
monsters committing the deep state problem. You know?
It's just always the same point. If these
people are the big d state villains that
Jones will tell you,
that either you're now working with the deep
state or you're telling us they're no longer
the deep state or that you were lying
in the beginning. You know? One of those
things has to be the case, but they
don't do that. They make you they make
some half hearted argument about how, well, they
see that he's gonna win and then they're
just jumping on his side. Hooray. We're winning.
It's like, okay. Then there's no accountability for
the the pedophile monsters you keep telling us
you're going after. Okay. That makes sense. You
know, because winning is more important than going
after the people that you're telling us is
the whole point about winning, you know, going
after the deep state.
Project Stargate, which we're gonna get into.
Nvidia,
dollars 500,000,000,000.
Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca. You know, going through
this and just looking at the overlap of
the COVID stuff, it's all the same people
that we were all calling out. Johnson and
Johnson, AstraZeneca,
Pfizer,
Eli Lilly, I mean, all and Gilead Sciences,
Merck. They're all investing in the US government.
Why is that a positive thing after what
we just went through?
Oh, well, they're gonna do it different now
because RFK is there. Well, guess what? You're
lying because that's not even true.
Going forward, Amazon, hooray. The good guys. Right?
Google, Blackstone, $25,000,000,000.
Woo hoo. Freedom.
Gilead Sciences, Merck.
And there's plenty more, by the way, that
have different conversations. GE Appliances. You know, Biogen.
Woo hoo.
There's plenty more we can go into. I
just wanna make a point. I said, these
are all these are examples of exactly what
they would have called out if it was
Biden doing it.
Now, here's what Trump had to say in
the in the over the
vaccine element of this. We're gonna do this
in two parts.
This first part is about the lie about
this push, about the vaccine push. The second
part is about the the weird dinner they
had with Bill Gates, the rest of them.
It just shows you both these things coming
together, you know, that you're that you're either
lying to yourself or you're letting them lie
to you.
Kind of the same point. So, Bernie Sanders,
you know you're winning when Bernie Sanders has
your back. Right? He says every even President
Trump gets it right once in a while.
Congratulations, Republicans. Congratulations, Alex Jones and Bennett Johnson
and and all of them out there. You
now side with then with Bernie Sanders because
you're all the same thing. Right? Now winning.
Then if Bernie Sanders is on your team,
then that means that you're on the right
side because he just recognizes that you're winning.
Right?
Okay. Funny. Bernie Sanders says Trump's right.
Vaccines are safe and effective. They've saved millions
of lives. Sadly, Kennedy disagrees. Well, Kennedy says
a lot of things, but clearly his actions
prove otherwise, which will make the case yet
again. But in case you missed this, because
trust me, all the team sport players will
not show you this, and there are people
out there avoiding this like the plague. Here's
Trump
telling you that I mean, walking back even
the flimsy arguments that like, so let's be
clear. RFK Jr has come out and made
statements that are even in in
even if it's on the side of, like,
calling things out, are still not even close
to what he was saying before he was
put in this position.
But then the proof is that his actions
are not even coming close to that. He's
going the wrong direction. On top of the
fact that there's self amplifying, trans amplifying shot,
they're also just reapproving the commodity shot.
There's no way you make sense of that
with what they're presenting as what their stance
is. On top of that, though, Trump came
out after RFK gave his his arguments about
why they're lying and, you know, the and
Florida and they're and they're put and which
I agree
with, getting rid of the mandates for anything.
Here's Trump's response.
Try to work this into him being on
the side of fighting these things.
Question. The the vaccine
mandates that we rolled back, for school children.
What what do you think about that? Well,
I think we have to be very careful.
Look. You have some vaccines that are so
amazing.
The polio vaccine, I happen to think is
amazing.
A lot of people think that,
COVID is amazing. You know? There are many
people that,
believe strongly in that, but you have some
vaccines that are so
incredible.
And I think you have to be very
careful when you say that
some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's
a very, you know, it's a very tough
position.
So,
I'd give you an answer. I'll give you
a a feeling, but,
just initially, I heard about it yesterday, and,
it's a tough stance.
Look. You have vaccines that work. They're just
pure and simple work. They're not controversial at
all,
and I think those vaccines should be used.
Otherwise, some people are going to catch it,
and they endanger other people.
And when you don't have controversy at all,
I think people should take it. Yeah. Yeah.
So in case you missed it, you know,
if you don't take it, you're gonna hurt
grandma. There is literally no context in which
that makes sense within the constitution. You're not
the argument of course, all they're gonna say
is, well, he's not making you.
Like, is it is it that simple for
you to just give up your principles? Like,
you have to acknowledge that what he just
said is the core line, guys. It opens
the door to everything we think we're fighting.
Now there's only two ways to look at
this. He's either on that side,
which you don't agree with. You're gonna make
some weird sidestepping argument for a while. He
doesn't really mean what he just said,
or
he's just placating the people you know are
the people you're fighting.
So what does that mean? That means that
he, at some level, knows he has to
work with them, knows that he has to
appease them, and that's just the same point
for me.
He's not on your side if he's simply
playing the game to work with the people
you told us he was going to arrest.
Now when I'm saying points like that, I'm
not even necessarily saying I agree with that
at the end of the day. Many of
them I do. But it's just to make
the point that the people you think you're
following, that you think are guiding you through
something that's gonna save the country are the
very people you can prove to yourself are
lying to you, who do not have principles.
Right? They're feckless. They don't have anything sacred
to themselves
other than blindly supporting their team. And their
team means Trump. Nobody else at this point.
But, again, even even Trump's right once in
a while. Thanks, Bernie Sanders.
You're on the side of Bernie and Clinton
at this point, and Bill Gates and Zuckerberg
and BlackRock.
Hope that feels good.
So here's here's what Grock had to say.
What dates has Trump met with Bill Gates
over the last three years?
Four times. I knew it was four times.
12/27/2024,
Mar A Lago. 02/05/2025,
met at the White House. 08/26/2025,
met with Gates at the White House again.
09/04/2025.
Gates attended the White House dinner. We'll show
you again in a minute. Four times.
Clearly, he's gonna be going to Guantanamo. Right?
Clearly, Gates is the evil villain he's gonna
take down.
Now, obviously, he's working very closely with Gates,
and Gates is really excited about what they're
working on. Patches, self amplifying shots. He's been
very clear about that. All of which are
actually continuing. I'll show you right now.
I just don't know how you can lie
to yourself about that. Like, I'm talking to
people who are honest out there, who see
this and somehow try to lie themselves that
Alex is not misleading you. It's clear
these people are not on your side.
So that is just to show you. Now
there's arguments that say,
that this statement was made directly following meeting
with Gates. I did
fourth, fifth. Right? Certainly possible. I just have
the mind that that's not necessarily
accurate because I think he's been working with
Gates the whole time. And And I also
don't think this statement is any different than
what he's been saying the whole time.
You just love to pretend you say he
this is what he really meant. Wink, wink,
or Johnson goes, he didn't mean that even
though he literally said that. That's so people
look at the
read what John people say about him and
don't listen. That's what usually happens. The bottom
line is he's been saying this pretty much
the whole time. You know it if you
pay attention.
So here is an interesting overlap. So RFK
advisor, that's Malhotra, to claim vaccines cause cancer.
Well, we already know this. I mean, this
is important to understand. So this is why
the the only point I'm making really through
this is two is really really one thing
overall.
Here they are trying to present to you
that they're the ones fighting,
exposing,
calling out
the COVID vaccine lies and what they did
to you. Right? In some ways, they're saying
those things.
And then I'm juxtaposing that with I'm I'm
putting it alongside
the fact that they're still supporting all of
those things.
The same COVID shots, the same mRNA, they're
making it worse with self amplifying and everything
else they're doing. So you can't look at
RFK in front of congress going, you guys
push these vaccines. They're hurting people and I
can't do while he then supports the new
Comirnat shot, while he supports other
COVID shots, flu shots, mRNA, self amplifying. You
just can't make those two things make sense.
Either he's lying here, or I mean, really,
it's only one thing. He's lying because they're
they're supporting them. Or somehow he's being forced
to do it. I really don't know. So,
this is interesting because he's an advisor to
RFK,
pointing to the very shots I'll prove to
you they're currently supporting.
And it says, one of Robert one of
RFK's health advisers will tell reform members
that COVID vaccines cause cancer at the party's
conference on Saturday. This was from the fifth.
He believes that mister Farage supports his plan
to pause the rollout of all vaccines. I
disagree. Until they have been independently reviewed for
side effects.
Okay.
So even right there, my point is always
independently meaning who exactly? Now
because this person's there, you may convince yourself
that means it'll be done right.
But see, that's where you go astray. Maybe
he has good intention, but you should always
be critical of all of them the same
way. Maybe he wants it and they won't
let him. Right? So the point is don't
just assume what they present through something like
this is the good thing because he's there,
even if he really is the right person.
Question it all the same. The only way
you're not gonna be misled, and even then,
you still might be. You just gotta be
honest and objective and question everything equally. The
point clearly is that independent,
whether with him or anybody else, could mean
something that might find or it could be
another way they do. Okay. Here's the same
information. It's safe and effective. Like, they already
did. That's what I find so crazy about
this. Both the CDC and the FDA
under this Trump administration
have already come out and said the data
says safe and effective.
And we know that's not true, and then
we just move on and pretend like that's
not what Trump thinks.
Even though he's literally said that 17 times,
there's some very serious, like, self, like, delusion
going on around this conversation.
So whether they independently do them or not,
doesn't necessarily prove anything. Like, it's up for
you to decide.
Mister Kennedy junior, mister Kennedy junior, has recently
fired the entire board of his vaccine advisers
to the US government and cut $500,000,000
in state funding for mRNA vaccines. That's not
true. Not even remotely. Since the Pfizer jab
developed to tackle COVID. No. See, this is
a even the Telegraph, even mainstream media, they
repurposed that. They they said they stopped 22
contracts. As far as I can tell, it's
only been 17.
I've told you I'm keeping up on this.
On top of that and and many of
them are ones that were already fine winding
down, were already going away, were already no
longer necessary. So, again, they're playing games with
this stuff. And I'm gonna prove to you
regardless, there's they're heavily leaning in to the
very thing they claim they're stopping.
But $500,000,000
was not cut. They simply repurposed it into
both the vaccine platform, which is literally $500,000,000,
or the many other shots they are paying
for. So to them to claim they cut
funding,
this supposed to be the media that hates
Trump, that wants to call him out for
things, doesn't that seem
odd? Quote, I think that a major driver
of the stress on the system since the
pandemic is not COVID, says Maholtra. It's it
is vaccine injury. 100%
agree.
Quote. And these are Trump the ones that
Trump supports, guys. Quote. Millions of people are
walking around with all sorts of illnesses, and
there needs to be a moratorium on vaccines
in The UK and The US. I agree.
It's not happening, though. Funny funny the disconnect
between old people he puts in the position
and then what they actually do. It says
he added that mRNA vaccines are causing turbocancers
in young people who were not at risk
of serious harm from COVID because they
interfere with tumor suppressing genes, exactly like we've
been telling you, like Kevin McCurran and plenty
of others have been telling you for years
now.
Okay. So the real point is just that
we know this, and that, yes, mRNA and
the shot they're currently supporting
do hurt you as his own advisor tells
you. Okay.
Here are some articles. I'll just include some
shows we did around this. This is from
2022. Peer reviewed study finds mRNA jabs suppress
immune system. That's this really the same point.
I'll include the this is the Swiss policy
research article that they've I think they've
it's not like that they maybe they've stopped
updating it, but they were doing it pretty
frequently as the as it was developing through
the COVID point. And there's plenty oh, there's
some new stuff in here, actually. There's plenty
of studies near that quite literally prove to
you. I think this is one of the
main ones right here. It has been shown
that in up to fifty percent of people
that take those shots, that they can induce
temporary immune suppression or immune dysregulation known as
lymphocytopenia
that then clearly show what just leads to
cancer.
Then that's just, you know, not just cancer,
but turbo, like, rapidly producing cancers.
I mean, we've been selling you this from
2020, guys. Here's one from 2023.
New modified RNA or the mod RNA that
they use, cancer jab will also destroy your
immune system. They were testing it all the
way back then. And you don't you don't
think that's one of the ones we're talking
about today? How is the mod RNA created?
It's worth watching that show.
Here's one from 2024.
Peer reviewed science finds mod RNA injections, Pfizer,
Moderna, etcetera,
cause cancer.
Just showing you that we've been on this,
telling you. Right? So here's Michael Flynn. This
is September
6.
Every single American needs to stand up for
Kennedy and RFK Junior
or the same point. Just two tags. All
of those that are in this don't like
what he's doing. Take a hike.
Okay. So there's clearly an image being presented
to the CDC and the rest, the HHS
are all going after him because they don't
like what he's doing by by cutting these
other contracts.
Okay. Maybe it is the case.
But how do you not bring into it
that, okay, then but he's still supporting mRNA
shots? Yes. Okay. He's still supporting self amplifying
shots? Yes. Okay. He's still supporting even further
trans amplifying? Yep. Seems that way. Making patches?
Go gate gate support? Yep.
Okay. So what's really different here? You don't
like that you're shaving off some of them
and focusing on one's particular? Like, they're trying
to make it sound like they're not doing
that. That they're trying to go after him
because he's cutting back on mRNA. I don't
think that's happening.
He says, we the people voted for this.
They love that argument.
Like, as if literally everybody all voted for
the exact same things. I have friends dead
from the vax. I have autism in my
immediate family. Yes. Yes. I agree with that.
That's what happened. Speaking for myself, I'm sick
of it. Okay. I am too. But if
you're pointing at what RFK is doing, then
you're either not seeing it or you're lying
to yourself because he is doing the same
thing.
Like, literally as we speak, the Comirnaty shot
for 2026
is already approved by the FDA.
So isn't that the shot you're talking about,
General? Right?
I don't understand.
You know, I do, obviously.
This is Joseph Ford Connell saying, HHS Insurrection.
Thousand staff demand RFK Jr's early, you know,
or early exit. No. Maybe that's real. Maybe
they just are convinced that he is doing
that and they feel because they're caught in
the same partisan bubble. I don't know.
Either way, what I'm simply saying is that
whether or not they're attacking him, he's doing
the the problem that you think he's fighting.
Here's Bennie Johnson. Same thing. Breaking. Whistleblowers inside
data chest. CDC have just sent critical information
on active sabotage operations taking place.
Okay.
So why would they sabotage this if he's
leaning into the direction that they actually want?
As I see it anyway. Left wing career
bureaucrats are in total panic over him shutting
down their big pharma grift. Well, that's not
happening though. See, that's the point. And they're
trying to take down the agencies from the
inside, you know, or this is all them
creating the the counterbalance to make it seem
like he's the one struggling to do the
right thing. So you basically inadvertently support the
very thing you thought you were fighting because
we know they've never done that before. Right?
And and it's pretty obvious that Bennet Johnson's
a really gritty investigator that doesn't just fall
for anything. Right? He doesn't just come out
and cheerlead whatever they say that day. Right,
guys?
Because if he did, then you couldn't just
take what he said. You know, you got
him going. Clearly, because he does that, because
Bennett Johnson will come out and go, yay,
whatever they said all day every day, then
then you can't look at this and take
it at face value. He would cheer whatever
they said was happening because that's what he
does.
It could be.
But you're smart enough to make that decision
for yourself and not blindly follow cheerleaders and
partisan players.
Same thing here. RK Jr just went off
for two minutes straight, tearing into the politicization
politicization
of COVID.
Well, it's one forty six, so you're you're
bad at this. You know, really a joke,
but the point is kinda not. Like, these
people are just fast and loose with the
truth all the time. My point though here,
listen to what he says,
and then let's walk through what's actually happening.
And you tell me that him grandstanding in
front of congress and going, you guys are
supporting the shots that are killing people, and
then he goes out and supports the shots
that are killing people.
Tell me how that makes sense.
Do you believe COVID nineteen
was politicized?
Yeah. The whole process was politicized, senator.
I mean, we were lied to about everything.
We were lied to about,
about natural immunity. We're lied to about, you
know, we were told again and again the
vaccines would prevent transmission. They prevent infection. It
wasn't true.
They knew it from the start. It wasn't
true because that's what the animal studies and
the clinical trial showed. Oh, how funny is
that?
Not that I needed to make that point,
but, you know, it's worth demonstrating our value
seeing as how we were saying exactly that
from the very earliest point that they put
out their documents because that's what it said,
referencing Tau Zacks from Moderna and others that
literally told you that they knew that. And
we were still I mean, to this very
day, we're still discounted. People like, it's just
crazy how that information is breaking when he
says it even though many of us were
saying it from day one. Because they we
actually comb through the documents.
You see, this is what real investigators do
in this conversation.
Right? You look for yourself and you break
things out that aren't necessarily easy to see
or aren't
popular, but it's the truth.
We were told that there was science behind
cloth masks.
The You know, same point. Especially that one,
guys. You know as well as I. That
was a hill that I died on. Not
literally, but, you know, like, I've I've I've
like, this is so obviously wrong. And even
to this day, people still don't wanna acknowledge
how the evidence before it ever started was
clear right in the beginning.
And yet we watch that evolve, and yet
they still never acknowledge. Oh my god. Look
at these people who are right about this
in the midst of the heaviest propaganda from
day one. And it's plenty of us. Not
just me. It's plenty of us.
But does anybody get that credo because we
don't live in an honest system right now?
Maybe we never will. Yeah.
The CDC
allowed the teachers union
to write the
order closing our schools,
which hurt working people all over the country
and then pretend it was science based.
All of these issues and then I can
show you. Like, for example,
chairman Wyden was talking about me politicizing
ASIP. During COVID,
the the probably the the most famous scientist
on ACIP was Martin Kulldor from Harvard, the
great renowned world renowned epidemiologist
and vaccinologist.
And he criticized
the COVID booster mandates.
They ejected him from COVID because he wasn't
in the orthodoxy.
The two biggest health officials at FDA during
COVID,
doctor Gruber and doctor Kronos,
criticized the Biden mandates vaccine mandate. But, you
know, president Biden said in August,
I would never take that vaccine, the Trump
vaccine.
And he came Yeah. The same one that
they're still getting right now. Many mandated it,
and then he fired the two top health
officials at FDA who said, hey. This thing
has not been properly tested. Right. So Still
hasn't, by the way. The whole process was
politicized. Other than you being tested is, I
guess, the point. Even today So let me
I'm 15. Because all all that aside. Right?
You know all of this. Whether you watch
my show or anybody else who even barely
scratched the surface, those are, like, the surface
level talking points. So all that's all around
the shot, that's all that's around. Like, so
this whole thing, they're praising me. Look at
it. It just tore through about all this.
It all comes down to whether or not
the shot is being forced, given, you know,
even offered. That's what this is really about.
So I think it's insane that we can
pretend like they're not clearly already on that
side. So I just wanted this to be
clear because it's funny how people push back
on this kind of stuff. I get it,
but here's here's Pfizer's page. I I saw
this and I'm thinking like, okay. Is this
like, I wanna make sure this is not
some like
ask you tell me in the chat. Have
you seen anybody talking about this?
I just think it's strange to me that
something this large, Comernity, quite literally the and
it's B n t, b t oh, now
I'm gonna forget again. BNT621
damn it. I was just about laughing because
I was just looking it up. So I
was trying to find that document that we've
talked about from the beginning. I'm gonna track
that down. And I was I was remembering
it, like, now I forgot again. But the
point was that that's the original Pfizer shot,
the one they went with. They then it
be then it became emergency authorized
and that weird fake approval they gave it,
and they give me they turned it into
Comerty. That's how that works. It was never
even technically approved. This this thing has jumped
around and has never even gone to the
right channels and have now has been approved
by the FDA on 08/27/2025.
The original this is it's the only difference
is that they've updated it to the new
l p eight one lineage. They claim it's
super dangerous
even though we know for a fact that
it's based on something they lied about from
day one.
2025,
2026
COVID nineteen vaccine formulation.
Announced the US FDA has approved the supplemental
biologics license application for the company's
l p eight one adapted monovalent COVID nineteen
vaccine,
the l p eight one COVID nineteen vaccine
mRNA
for the use of adult 65 and older
as well
as five year old through 64 if you've
got one
underlying condition, again, which is most of this
country.
Okay.
So an mRNA shot, check. COVID nineteen, check.
New big Comirnaty, check. So this is exactly
what they just claimed they were fighting.
The ex like, literally the same shot with
the updated antigen. That's what this is.
How does that make sense? Where are all
these honest people that are out there claiming
that they're pushing back? Because you have to
understand, if their claim is we're rolling this
stuff back,
we're only gonna let these new projects we'll
show you right now, you know, kinda finish
because we already funded them.
Explain this. Why would you then allow the
new version of the COVID shot, mRNA, if
you just told us you're leaning away from
mRNA? There's no way you make sense of
that unless you just are honest with yourself
and that there are no actual I'm getting
the sense they're not even remotely stopping any
of it. I at first I was thinking
okay maybe just pull back on mrna and
lean into self amplifying and claim that's a
different thing. It seems to me they're not
even doing that they're just lying to you
surprise surprise.
Here's the FDA.
COVID nineteen vaccine 2025, 2026 formula for use
in The United States beginning in fall twenty
twenty five.
So this is just not being reported anywhere.
It's posted,
but so it's not being used until the
fall. Let's wait and see when this breaks
out. Breaking news three late three weeks later
from Jones. Right? The point clearly is that
this is happening. And I doubt even then
they even talk about it.
So he just just in case, here's what
here's what Grock said. Yes. Comirnaty
was current is currently approved for adults 65
and older, as well as individuals five to
sixty four. It was approved on August 27.
So on top of all that, Trump admin
has already leaned into the self amplifying shot.
So let me show you those as well
just so it's all here in the same
segment. The reality of what they're currently doing.
Oh, before we get to that actually, this
the general point is that they're leaning into
self amplifying and other versions and keeping the
RNA in other categories.
As I said in their own post, it'll
it won't affect anything but the shots they
claim they're stopping
under the guise of stopping mRNA.
So here's Nick's order going, holy crap. RFK
just crushed Elizabeth Warren.
This is all they want from this is
all they think you want. Give us a
big grandstanding moment where they go, you're a
dumb democrat. No. You're a stupid Republican. And
we go, woo. We all cheer because they're
so stupid. And then, ultimately, nothing changes, but
we all go, give us more change and
progress.
I simply said so RFKG oh, I think
I
just read it because the point is simple.
He says, we aren't going to recommend a
product for which there is no clinical data
for that indication.
That's what Artin answered. He said, because that's
what he said, and I've listened to it
myself.
They're just he goes, like, you've taken money
from pharma. Oh, mic drop. Yeah. You all
have, by the way, including him. This is
such a dishonest. Nick and the rest of
them are just so shockingly dishonest. Or they're
just stupid enough to not know that.
But okay. He says, we're not going to
recommend it for which there's no clinical data
for it. Okay. You mean, like, other than
the many COVID flu
injections, mRNA self amplifying, and otherwise that you're
currently doing just that for?
I don't know why anyone falls for these
theater shows.
So you don't wanna do that except for
the examples that you're currently doing that. Okay.
That makes sense.
Derek Bro says when you lie as much
as RFK, it's hard to keep your story
straight. He spent the COVID nineteen eighty four
years rightfully calling out Operation Warp Speed and
the shots.
But once he sold out and joined the
Trump team, he had
he had to play ball and back off
of Operation Warp Speed. It says yesterday at
the congressional hearing, he was asked if he
thinks Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for
Warp Speed.
He said yes.
That that speaks for itself, if anybody honest.
He was then promptly called out for previously
speaking against the operation.
He can't keep his story straight because he
lacks principles.
If you just speak truth all the time,
you don't play politics. You don't end up
twisting into knots over your own words. Another
way of saying that, you've heard me say
a lot, if you lie about everything,
eventually, you're gonna step on a previous lie
to sell the new one. You're gonna contradict
something you lied about before, maybe because you
forgot you did because it's not truth. Right?
So drift my point is you lie about
everything, which they do. You eventually,
which is what you they do every day.
You contradict one you made before. Here's the
clip.
And I'm approaching this as a doctor, not
as a senator. I am concerned about children's
health, seniors' health, all of our health.
And I applaud you for joining the president
in a call for radical transparency.
Thank you for that.
I said yesterday, I believe it, that president
Trump deserves a Nobel Prize for Operation Warp
Speed.
If he had been president Obama, he would
have gotten it. But because of operation warp
speed forcing the federal government to come to
a vaccine development within ten months when others
said it couldn't be done,
we saved millions of lives globally, trillions of
dollars. We reopened economy economies. Incredible accomplishment.
Mister secretary, do you agree with me that
the president that the president deserves a Nobel
Prize for operation Warp Speed? Absolutely, senator. So
let me ask you.
But you just told
senator Bennett
that the COVID vaccine killed more people than
COVID.
Wait. That was a statement. I did not
say that. K. Then let me ask because
you also Senator,
I just wanna make clear. I I can't
say that. We'll we'll check the record. That's
Okay. It's irrelevant
because you know as well as I that
he's very clearly said that COVID shots killed
a lot of people. Same point, guys. So
if the shot that worked to be produced
killed a lot of people and he tells
you and has many times that you should
run from it screaming, you know, paraphrasing or
really just kind of you know, he's suggested
similar points that amount to the same outcome.
Don't take it.
And now says that they should get a
war a peace prize or a Nobel Prize
for the operation that produced that. It's not
hard to understand. He's lying. A question of
fact. You also said that I'd say We'll
we'll check the record. That's a question of
fact.
You also said that you were also as
lead attorney for the children's health defense,
you engaged in multiple lawsuits
attempting to restrict access to the COVID vaccine.
Again, it surprises me that you think so
highly of operation warp speed Right. When as
an attorney, you attempted to restrict access.
Well, let me ask. I'm happy to I'm
happy to explain why.
I have I have three minutes and thirty
seconds left.
Now, guys, there's you can feel free to
try to insert some explanation you think makes
sense. The obvious reality is it's hypocritical. There's
no way around it. You can't argue like,
you could try to go, well, it was
a tremendous marshalling of of resources and blah
blah blah, whatever. You wanna think, like, the
idea that so so you marshal resources in
a very professional way that then killed a
lot of people, but we can still praise
the resource marshaling that killed a lot of
people. It's just stupid. It's obviously not what
he thinks, and he's now doing it for
the team, just like Gabbard did in a
very public way, sort of a humiliation
ritual, if you will.
So here is what Grock said in regard
to the many shots.
The ones that we've pointed many times, and
we'll just go through them. But I want
you guys to understand,
these are ones that are connected to The
United States
and are largely funded through BARDA. Now in
some cases, those are ones that are being
stopped.
Like, so I think it was 17 they
claim have been canceled. Right? In some cases.
Now what we're gonna show you what I'm
gonna go through right now
before, actually, before I go through those I
should do that next. Actually, read this first.
Before we go through them, the point is
that some of them could end tomorrow. Like,
he could cancel the contract tomorrow. My point
is, as always, to show you what the
current data shows. And as of right now,
there's a hell of a lot of other
shots, some of which are currently like we
showed you, the old MRA ones that are
still there, but plenty of new ones that
they're currently working on, not old contracts they're
seeing through, but new self amplifying work.
Before that, here's an article from last month.
Tremendous uncertainty for cancer research as US officials
target mRNA vaccines.
As US regulators script COVID mRNA vaccines and
as independent vaccine advisers reexamine the shots, scientists
fear that an unlikely target could be next,
cancer research.
You see, this is what's interesting is so
they haven't said, like, only the COVID version
or only this. They just were claiming mRNA
because that is one of the issues for
most people. So this is sort of like
trying to decouple this well. Cancer's a different
thing. Well, no. It's just mRNA. This is
one of the bigger things. It's whatever they
go forward with. People are concerned about that
direction.
So this is about Stargate. And I think
you know where this is going. It says
at least 16 grants involving the word mRNA
have been terminated or frozen.
Frozen is not terminated, and many of them
were already going away. Many of them were
already supposed to end. So that's it's a
game just like we've seen before.
Especially,
if if none of the shots I've talked
about right now were happening, I might go
I might be like, well, they're canceling some
and they're gonna get there. The fact that
you can prove, like, for example, Comerity has
been approved for the new one, there's just
they're lying to you. There's no way around
it. That does not line up with what
they said is happening.
It says, according to the crowdsource project grant
watch, the scientists have been told to remove
mentions. This is really important. So, again, the
full picture is 16 so far
have been terminated or frozen
according to their the grant watch, and scientists
have been told
by this administration
to remove mentions of mRNA vaccines from their
research applications.
Okay.
Now this is a clear picture to me
that we're talking about a situation
where you have
research that's being done, and I think the
self amplifying and different stuff is already a
way for them to sidestep that it just
say it's not mRNA.
But like I said with, like, the platform
stuff, if they're just, like, omitting that mRNA
is included at this point,
oh, that is another way that you could
pretend it's not happening. Just a thought. It's
just only it's just up in the air.
It's what they say. So going forward, if
they're gonna be presenting things and I so
it's the public facing information. Right? The study
you see from NIH, whatever. And it in
no way mentions mRNA,
but it's there. How do we ever know
that?
That's a really alarming thought. And I think
I mean, if we this is what I'm
trying to show in general to anybody who's
not partisan.
This is alarming, what's happening. It's not just
COVID shots, not just health, but everywhere you
look right now, the US government, left or
right, is being shockingly dishonest, like, in a
way I've never seen before. Like, public in
your face challenging you to call it out,
being willfully dishonest.
Like, in cases like this, where it's not
even like a nuanced debate, you can literally
prove that they're lying about what they're doing
as to whether you choose to acknowledge it.
On Thursday, the FDA approved the original COVID
mRNA vaccine from from Moderna for children, this
is last month, between the ages of six
months and 11.
But they narrowed its use to children with
at least one underlying condition, the vaccine for
people older than 12. So and, again, same
point. And we just went through this. And
now they did this is the one we
talked about then. And they claim they're walking
back, but to best of my knowledge, it's
still available to anybody who wants it right
now.
COVID remains a leading cause of death in
The US, they claim, with a hundred and
seventy eight deaths in the week ending in
June 7, the last week for which The
U the CDC offers complete data.
It says, also in May, The US canceled
766,000,000
in contracts for research on mRNA vaccines against
h five n one, bird flu. Yeah. That's
because they're simply rolling it into the self
amplifying versions. I'll show you next. The investment
in the mRNA vaccine was not scientifically or
ethically justifiable, Andrew Nixon said, the HHS communications
director. He said this statement to the media,
adding that the mRNA technology remains under tested.
Okay. Same point. Here's a guy in the
HHS
telling you that mRNA
technology as an entire category is under tested,
but let's walk through the 17 projects they're
using right now than putting in your arm.
You can't make sense of this stuff, guys.
If that's the case, then none of this
should be happening right now. All they're hoping
is that you just go on narrative and
follow people like Bennie Johnson. In January, Trump
hosted the launch of Stargate AI at the
White House. The project could eventually identify cancers
and develop mRNA vaccines
in days, Larry Ellison, the share of the
tech company Oracle, who was involved with the
project, said at the launch. The project will
be funded by private, not federal dollars, which
you know.
But the work on cancer would draw upon
research on can
but the work on cancer would draw upon
research on cancer and mRNA among other fields.
So we already knew this, but this is
where the point gets to where you it's
privately funded,
which doesn't have to do with government funding.
So that I promise you, which is what
I already was saying, which is what the
evidence already shows. This is Stargate's gonna go
forward with mRNA, cancer, and anything else, and
it's just gonna be, well, we're not funding.
It's just it's just the public private overlap.
It's being done by the White House. It
was literally presented by Donald Trump. But as
long as we pretend it's not their tax
dollars, if but all you need end doing
is, you know, giving a grant to Larry
Ellison who then funds the Stargate Project, and
you're like, hey. We didn't fund the Stargate
Project. It's very simple. So this is a
massive mRNA project that is continuing.
And it goes on to say, but he's
optimistic that mRNA vaccines for cancer and other
illnesses will be able to move forward. So
the real point is that this will be
funded through outside,
you know, private funding. It's already going forward.
Now there hasn't been major traction on it
yet, but we already see the direction. We
already see where this is going, and they're
already trying to decouple these things. And I
think it's very clear
that this entire platform, I think, is going
to be sort of a, like, a,
a bedrock for the way that where this
intersects, right? The
AI massive direction and the AI massive health
field
coming together for ways that I don't think
I don't even think we recognize just yet.
So here again are the many different shots.
Arcturus, we've talked about. And why it doesn't
even list amplitude in here, by the way,
which shows me the deep and as always,
don't trust these platforms.
But let's go through these.
So first again, the ones I showed you
from before, this one is and I I
should grab this just in case you haven't
seen it.
This was the post that all of the
dishonest people online pretended we're rolling. They're getting
rid of mRNA even though in this post,
it says, while some final stage contracts enlist
explicitly
Arcturus and Amplitude. Those are two companies. So
what they're working on in regard to these
shots are going to continue.
We'll be allowed to run their course, which
is not the same as approving a new
COVID shot. So they're lying. But it goes
on to say to preserve pry taxpayer investment.
No new mRNA based projects. So right there,
they're gonna go, well, it's COVID shot. It's
not new. Right?
But it is though. It's a new engine.
It's a new shot. It's just they're playing
with you. They're lying to you. And they
know that. They know that you see it
if you look. They don't care about any
of us. But it also goes on to
say
oh, that's weird. Oh, it's right here. I
thought the article changed. Other uses
oh, and then again,
$500,000,000,
which is the 22 they said. They haven't
canceled all of them yet, but that that
money just gets shifted into other vaccines, so
it's not cutting cost. Other uses of mRNA
technology,
other uses of mRNA technology within the department
are not impacted by this announcement. And that's
why I covered in this episode,
or maybe I closed it already.
Yeah. I did. It's, you know, that it's
RNA in food or any other,
in many other aspects of mRNA use are
not being affected.
It's important to think about.
So Amplitude Therapeutics.
Fast track designation
for h five n one, and it is
very clearly a self amplifying mRNA
shot. That's twenty twenty
five. Include this for you real quick.
This one I also showed you. And this
is this is the important thing to remember
because it's the best way to search for
it in my opinion. It's ARCT
dash two three zero four. That's why you
can find like the actual studies of the
actual material and not just some like Fox
News report about the larger named shot. Like,
there's just so there's so many layers. That's
what you wanna search for. In this case,
a r c t one five four, which
is the self amplifying COVID nineteen shot.
Those are all happening. And those are just
some of them, guys. Here
is Amplitude.
Moderna provides update on norovirus
vaccine candidate.
This is beginning of the year.
MRNA
14 o three. Now it says Moderna's mRNA
one four zero three is a messenger RNA
based tri trivalent vaccine candidate designed to protect
against multiple norovirus.
Imagine somebody's going in and getting, like, their
normal flu shot, getting a norovirus shot, getting
a COVID shot, and each one's aimed at,
like, 16 different things or three different things.
Because that's totally not gonna act weird in
your body, right? One of these things giving
multiple antigens has already been shown to cause
all sorts of crazy things. We went over
this extensively. Fauci told you that. If We
vaccinate for the wrong things, bad things could
happen. Well, there you go.
I just it's just inevitable, it seems.
It's currently being evaluated in the randomized trial.
This is one of the one. This is
Amplitude
Therapeutics.
Where was it?
Or maybe that's maybe that is this is
it this one?
Oh, so all of these shots are the
ones oh, sorry. That's what I forgot to
do. I could do it right here.
+1 403.
So this is one being developed with BARDA
and and the Department of Defense because that
makes you feel good. Right?
That the status is ongoing development. So that's
my point is that right now, it's still
going. Hasn't been canceled. There's no indication it's
going to be. So it's just one more
example of a self amplifying Moderna shot on
top of the Pfizer and Comirnaty that's already
being used. That means Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, Gilead.
I mean, every single one, Johnson and Johnson,
AstraZeneca
are all currently invested in working alongside the
Trump administration. It's just it's just so silly
to me.
So that's one of them that's going forward.
Here is one.
Genetic,
engineering and biological biotechnology news. It's HDT three
zero one, also called rep RNA c o
v two s.
Alphavirus
derived replicon RNA vaccine encoding the SARS CoV
two spike protein. The RNA replicons are formulated
with lipid inorganic nanoparticles,
even worse, called lions, which are designed to
enhance vaccine stability, delivery, and immunogenicity.
Immunogenicity.
That is the lipid nanoparticle problem from last
time. That's what caused a large part of
those problems. They just don't care. Or these
people don't
are basically
being guided by the fake science that was
produced by manipulators without knowing that they're being
lied to. And it just compounds. It gets
worse. These people really don't care about you.
All these are in this is an interesting
larger point. Access to Advanced Health Institute.
The it's called the Access to Advanced Health
Institute, AAHI,
is actively developing self amplifying RNA candidates through
multiple projects with a primary focus on creating
accessible temperature stable vaccines for global health threats.
The grace of development involves a $9,900,000
project awarded by the Department of Defense, The
United States, and BARDA to develop a prototype
intranasal bivalent influenza RNA vaccine targeting h five
n one, h seven n nine strains, which
is currently in phase one. Yeah. That's happening.
And, of course, this work builds on their
earlier phase trials of their self amplifying COVID
nineteen shot which is also happening.
These are all working these are not being
canceled you can look into it as always
everything I mentioned is listed below after I'm
done for you to research for yourself that
you should.
But this is like a like an institute
that's working on multiple versions of this and
all being funded by The US. It's funny
how that doesn't get brought up when RFK
Junior is standing up about his, you know,
a tirade about the COVID nineteen shots.
Self amplifying
mRNA SARS CoV two vaccine candidate induces safe
and robust protective immunity. Twenty twenty two, January.
So in the midst of these trials, these
are all being funded right now.
Now this is Amplitude. I couldn't find it.
That's what I thought was interesting.
Then I list it there, but I so
I the the Amplitude Therapeutics,
along with Arcturus, are the two that RFK
mentioned in particular and said those ones will
continue. Okay. Well, it turns out that they're
the ones that seem to be spearheading, surprise,
surprise,
the trans amplifying direction that we were already
talking about. Trans amplifying mRNA vaccine expressing consensus
spike elicits broad neutralization of many different variants
for the SARS CoV-two. That's what it is.
It is it is just like it sounds.
It is a it's take a self amplifying,
but, like, some you know, right now, the
idea is you have a self amplifying shot
that produces many, many like, what the current
shot does. It it keeps producing spike protein.
They claim it doesn't even though we all
know that it does and it's been proven
75 times over. It's obvious.
What like I told you, that's why it
was listed like that, I think, in the
beginning.
So when you have trans amplifiers, that means
that you have multiple antigens all making many,
many repeated versions of the same yeah. That
sounds like it's gonna work out. I mean,
if the if the one version of that
was causing the problems we saw, imagine one
with many
three or more different antigens that are
reproducing over and over or out your throughout
your body, changing your body genetically. That's what
we're talking about.
40 times less antigen than mRNA, except they
keep reproducing.
It's it's just a game. They're it's experimentation
on you. My point is, amplitude,
that's they're focused on. Primarily focused on developing
a next generation trans amplifying mRNA vaccine. Okay.
So when RFK Jr
comes out and tells you that we're going
to be winding down mRNA, except for ones
made by those two companies,
pretty deceptive, isn't it? Seeing as how they're
not even remotely winding those things down. They're
aggressively leaning into it. Now here again, the
risk the collaborations with DOJ, JPO, we just
mentioned that.
Designed to enhance antigen trans amplifying,
enhance antigen expression, and improve manufacturing
flexibility compared to mRNA.
Their work is centered on preclinical studies to
establish this platform. Exactly. That's what they're all
working for. So if why would they be
funding this work toward a platform if they're
going a different direction?
Trans amplifying vaccine platform. See, I told this
is exactly what I knew was coming. Not
because I'm guessing, but because the evidence shows
you this. Amplitude Therapeutics is conducting pre preclinical
studies to assess the potential of their tRNA
approach, which aims to provide a simplified alternative
to self amplifying shots. We we haven't even
been
told that we're using self amplifying shots, and
they're building beyond that already. Like, it's it's
wild to me. We already showed you this
one. It's the same overlap. CEPI, worth the
same funding. New research to investigate next generation
trans amplifying. This is Amplitude.
With up to 1,000,000 in funding from CEPI.
Right? So my other point of showing you
how they all interconnect, you can claim that
we don't support CEPI, but this is how
it overlaps.
Researchers at Amplitude Therapeutics will perform preclinical studies
that assess whether their trans amplifying vaccines are
working.
All coming your way.
For and and then, of course, let's not
forget,
Kate's four times now met with him. Kate's
has been pretty adamant
for a long time now about specifically
the microarray
patch vaccines.
They call them maps sometimes. The point is
that it's microarray
or just a patch. Patch vaccines are the
easiest way that I that's what I call
it.
And these are mRNA patches that I I
just went over in the show. This is
just a US government funded mRNA
patch.
But, yeah, let's pretend like they're going away
from mRNA. Right, guys?
And yet, you know, you you get shouted
at by these people online because you just
you're you hate Trump, and you're the secret
democrat. You know? No. I just like the
facts. That's what it comes down to.
So let's finish with this. We might we
might just leave it here. Let's go get
to Venezuela likely tomorrow.
But this is just wild to me, guys.
I mean, just going back to the original
point, like, even like the inauguration with all
of them sitting there. K. I mean, you
know what they would say if it was
all those same people around Biden. They do
already say, oh, that's a deep state and
they're all working together. Globalism,
and all the same dumb things that you
know, not that we should ignore any of
these overlapping points, but that it's always about
trying to deflect you away from what is
obviously happening.
Sally Agra says, did you vote for this
guy? I said, it's okay. We've all been
duped by politicians at some point in our
lives. That's step one, acknowledging that there's a
problem.
Well, I'm in the second phase of my
career giving away all the wonderful money that
Satya's good work has,
helped
multiply a lot. Oh, they're such good friends.
But I think the thing that ties,
my first career, that I still spend some
time on because AI
is so phenomenal,
and my second career is innovation.
Innovating in
health,
in areas like,
vaccines or gene editing. And,
the president and I are talking about taking
American innovation to the next level to cure,
and even eradicate,
some of these diseases.
Oh, okay.
So totally not going in that direction? I
mean, how how do you it takes a
special kind of willful stupidity to not acknowledge
what's happening.
And we just heard Trump say the polio
vaccine, that's a good one. Really?
In what context? Like, these are the things
that RFK has called out. These are the
things that anybody even remotely knowledgeable in this
conversation are aware have been a problem.
In particular, the oral polio vaccine that they've
given that causes outbreaks, and yet they still
use it.
I mean, they have continually shown that the
outbreaks they now show are derived from the
oral polio vaccine they gave. So you can't
even claim that it's some spur. They are
all on the same page. They're literally laughing
around the dinner table right now telling you
what's coming, and we're supposed to pretend it's
some 40 chess move.
Is it possible? Obviously.
But the idea that you would just go,
it's all good because it's I'm told this
will lead some it's like, god. I can't
believe we're gonna be that stupid. I know
we're not. I don't think most people are
even remotely there right now. As much as
that may be hard for some of them
to to think about.
I think we're really in this sport at
a point where, you know, know, like I
said, you get the mainstream alternative media, you
get the corporate media, and they frame each
other as if that's what everybody else thinks.
It's just not at this point. There's a
huge overlap,
and it varies.
But I really don't think people are falling
for this. He mentioned polio, which is one
that we're close. We don't need new science
on that one.
For some like HIV and, sickle cell, we
do need new science, but The US Regarding
the science, new science on a port polio
or any of these things. Yeah. Except your
entire base and all of Maha would disagree
with
you. But that doesn't matter though because it's
not about you. You're finally realizing that, that
they don't actually care about what you want.
It's never been about what you want. It
was only about placating you to get what
they want.
Has the seeds that in the same way
that,
Warp Speed took those seeds and put them
together,
I think something fantastic can be done. Yeah.
Because Warp Speed was great. Thanks, Bill Gates.
So if you agree with Trump, then you're
on Gates' side.
Hope you enjoy that.
You know, AI,
for our foundation is that we wanted a
doctor for everyone,
in Africa through
AI. We want farmers to have incredible advice.
And Except except do they want those things,
though? Like, it doesn't matter. You the idea
that African people want your advice they don't
want you guys involved. That's become clear because
you keep screwing them inadvertently or deliberately,
or farmers or any of this stuff. Like,
it's all they're presenting this as if that's
what we all want.
And what's crazy about it continually to me
is that Trump's base are the people that
don't want it the most. And here they
are presenting it to you as if it's
what you asked for. Hey. We voted for
this, says Bennet Johnson.
It's just it's I mean, it would be
comical if it wasn't so alarming, guys. You
know, kids to have a chance to learn.
So,
the work being done by the people at
this table is is changing the world. It's,
you know, coming fast. So it's great. You
know, we all get together and talk about
how The US can lead in this key
area and apply it even,
to the poorest outside The US as well
as to our great citizens. So thank you
for incredible leadership,
including getting this group together.
Yeah. Right. Clearly, they're adversaries,
obviously.
Well, let's look at it.
That was just to make the point. And
I I I said off Sal's comment, I
just don't know how any honest MAGA out
there can pretend that this is, you know,
along with Stargate, SAM RNA, etcetera,
is anything but a slap in the face,
guys. Now you could pretend it's some 40
chess move. Maybe you're right. But in the
moment,
aside from that hypothetical
wish,
it's a slap in the face. He's sitting
with the people that you were told would
be in jail. People that we all acknowledge
are part of a larger problem. Whether it's
fake philanthropy, whether it's Silicon Valley, whether it's
just infiltration of our government. I mean, any
number of overlaps.
Because, again, you guys largely told us this
would happen. So right now, it is a
slap in the face.
And as expected, all the TeamSport Politics cheerleaders,
and you know who they are, are out
there talking about how great this is. We're
winning.
So here's what Alex Jones put out. I
mean, I just think it speaks for itself.
So this is what's going on. Right? It's
a hard sell for anybody. So not covering
this is hard for them to work right
now because people are immediately going, why are
you talking about this? Right?
So covering it is either you wanna do,
we have to go bad. We don't want
this. And then explain why you never stop
supporting them even though you constantly go, he
could be the worst thing ever, but now
he's on our side. You know, it's dumb.
Or you do something like this. So I
said, so is this Jones's way of sidestepping
this very embarrassing moment? Or does he simply
see this as more winning since it's all
obviously just an elaborate ruse to lure Gates
and Zuck and etcetera into positions of power
and and influence and then bang, right into
an military tribunal. Right? Obviously joking.
I'll make a point about the positions of
power as people just couldn't
after I'm done with this clip. But this
is what Jones posted because it's so serious.
Damn it. Sorry.
Well, I just wanted to apologize for every
single fucking version of Windows that sucked, which
is basically all of them. Also, sorry for
creating viruses just so I can profit from
selling you. Okay. You get the point. I
forgot it cussed, so I apologize about that.
But okay. So he made somebody put around
an AI thing that made fun of Bill
Gates. Right? So it caused two things that
I can see. It seems like most people
are now going, was that fake then? That
don't even happen? And then kind of letting
that be up in the air because they
don't like what happened, ignoring it going forward
is typical. Willful ignorance.
You know? Or or people that think that's
what you know, people are under this comment
going, did he really say that? It's like,
come on, guys. We gotta be smarter than
this. But
that's important, though. Right? Let's make fun of
this very dangerous thing, you know, so I
can pretend I covered it. But, you know,
it's always how this works, guys.
Pretty embarrassing.
So Five Times August says, the people you
thought were going to Gitmo are now fine
dining and taking business, talking business at the
White House.
Exactly.
See, this is what it looks like to
be principled.
He supported them. He now sees they're lying
and he calls it out because he's not
stupid.
Five times August.
Oh, and then by the way, all the
people in that room, Corey Dallas Jones, are
gonna be in prison very soon. Right? Remember
this? I'm still waiting. August 29?
Huge DOJ actions incoming. I had a long
talk with the top. You can listen to
it. Big, big, big announcements coming. Multiple grand
juries. It's all coming down. And I don't
say things like this with that's what he
says. You know me. I don't just make
things like this up. Yeah. Yeah. You literally
do. Any updates? I'm super excited about these.
Clearly not fake. Big, big, big actions coming.
Oh, and is Obama in jail yet since
you claimed that that was a sure thing?
Here's them down here saying
that he's that, Jones suggesting Trump's going to
prosecute Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, fellow Houch Houchy,
Hillary.
Fauci, Hillary.
I mean, there's only so many times you
can keep floating these bombastic things and it
not happen before you just go, oh, so
he's just a liar, or he doesn't care
that he's being constantly fed garbage from the
people he claims are resources knowing he'll lie
right to your face or not check it
for himself. Ask Owen Shroyer. Ask Greg Reiss.
Ask David Knight. Ask all the people that
have left and say the same thing. You
can decide.
Here's Charlie Kirk. META CEO Zuckerberg confirms that
the company will be investing 600,000,000,000
in the next three years. Fire.
Right. You mean after he goes to prison
though. Right, Charlie? Because that's what you told
us. And I said, woo hoo. Winning. Oh,
wait.
This is this is actually interesting the way
that this got covered.
This is what he said first. For hosting
us, and this is quite a group to
get together. And, you know, I think,
you know, all of the companies here are
building
just making huge investments in in the It's
it's all AI. It's all AI data centers
that are destroying small America. They don't care.
Sucking up water resources. I mean, this is
about something other than you, but they need
to sell you as team winning. Right? Team
humanity. You accept that you're teaming with all
the people we were told were against humanity.
But now they're on our side winning.
Country in order to build out data centers
and infrastructure
to, power the next wave of innovation. So
it's, you know, we don't often get together
as it as Yeah. Otherwise known as the
great reset.
What we're talking about, guys. The the the
the CEOs of the different companies, but it's
it's, good
to see it for. How much are you
spending, would you say over the next few
years? Oh, gosh. K. Remember this.
This is really important to most of us
already know this, but for those that somehow
don't know that they completely staged these things
and set this up and Trump does these
little show displays like in the Oval Office
or, you know, where he brings them in,
they are not the what was the I
forget the other room. They do it. The
point is just having bring in these world
leaders and you go, why aren't you doing
what I asked you to do? You know,
it's like it's just very contrived and really
insulting.
Remember that as he asked him, oh, yeah.
How much are you gonna invest?
I mean, I think it's probably gonna be
something like,
I don't know, at least $600,000,000,000
through
'28
in The US.
Yeah. It's a lot? No. It's a it's
a significant.
It's a lot. Thank you, Mark. It's great
to have you. Yeah. Great to have you,
Mark. Good. You're on the tier on our
side. Right?
You know? And then, of course, you got
we'll show you in a second. You got
the people doing what they normally do and
going wink wink, look at how we got
them all to bow, Trump's doing the thing,
and he's they're gonna be in jail tomorrow,
save them for the last.
No, I mean, really, I I'm I'm the
only reason I'm so just derisive of that,
like, as always, like like, when Q first
came, let's hope let's hope so. Right? I
hope criminals go to jail. And Trump or
anybody else, it doesn't I I praise the
action. And at some point, you started going,
okay. Well, Q keeps putting things out that
are really flimsy and don't make sense, and
they've they've turned super partisan all of a
sudden. You know, eventually you just go, okay,
it's obviously manipulation, but people still wanna believe
it. My point is that now looking back
at all of this, you just can't take
this seriously. Now, while I still hope
that I'm missing something and that you've always
been right, I will cheer that no matter
how many times I made fun of it.
I come up tomorrow and be like, I'm
wrong and and it's sad. I I missed
it somehow but look at the good outcome
because it's not about petty partisanship.
I care about the outcome. That's it.
The point here
is that what he says
secretly
off air or, you know, hot mic and
all that. And he didn't ask whether even
that was deliberate. That's how these things might
work too, you know? But But then he
gets asking, I wasn't sure what number you
wanted me to say. That's what Zuckerberg says.
How much are you spending, would you say
over the next few years?
Oh, gosh.
I mean, I think it's probably gonna be
something like,
I don't know, at least $600,000,000,000
through '28
in The US.
Yeah. It's a lot? No. It's a lot.
It's significant.
It's a lot. Thank you, Mark. It's great
to have you. Paying attention to questions. Sorry.
I wasn't ready to do our So So
I'm sorry. I wasn't ready to do our
this is inaudible. Oh, for a note. He
said I wasn't I wasn't I wasn't sure
what number you wanted to go
with. Now look, you could argue it's more,
you know, innocent than it may appear that
ultimately, he, you know, that they were gonna
discuss the real number and they already floated
numbers. I mean, I get it. I mean,
it doesn't always have to be some bombshell.
The point though is that ultimately, it's about
presenting something to you. And it's always the
way this works. And you don't even argue
as dishonest. It's it's contrived, which is not
necessarily the same thing. Politicians do that. We
know that. But weirdly, we act somehow like
that's not who these people are because we
know them. Oh, they're good, loving Christians and
they play the guitar and we know them.
They do this on Tuesdays. We know them.
It's like, no, you don't. You've been you've
been given a very clear impression of what
they want you to see them as, and
some of it may overlap with the truth,
but it's cultivated, guys. That's what this is.
That's why that's why so many of us,
including largely people on the right who thirty
seconds ago were seeing it, call this stuff
out. And now as many have just been
pulled in by the partisan manipulators out there.
But as he says, we're seeing North Korean
level propaganda.
This is oh, I forgot. Actually, that was
the picture I wanted to use today. That
would have been better. But see, you you
know, look, the line of people.
Right? The the David Icke says, I said
that Trump was put in power to front
up the AI oligarch takeover of society with
artificial intelligence, and that's exactly what he's doing.
I agree. He says with the oligarchs driving
the policy and direction.
Here are many at a White House dinner
yesterday, including Trump, AI czar, David Sacks,
Meta founder Zuckerberg, Apple CEO, Tim Cook, Microsoft
founder Bill Gates, Microsoft was just completely consumed
with Israeli intelligence.
Wiki leak Wiki pea WikiLeaks,
couldn't us combining the two, just recently point
out yet another example of that.
OpenAI founder Sam Altman, all the good guys.
Right? Google CEO,
Pin,
Sundar is it Pin, Pincha? Pinchai? How do
you say his last name?
Microsoft CEO? Because you gotta make sure you
got the real Israeli representation in there. Both
Microsoft people. Says clear your mind of all
the diversions, and this is the thrust of
the whole Trump regime. Installing the AI control
system on every level.
I know you see it.
I just wish, you know, it doesn't
there's so much manipulation out there. What's crazy
is you can have this where we do
this show. I actually believe most people are
aware of this, and yet there and it's
not you know, take people out there with
much larger followings. This information is just really
not allowed to get breached right now.
But call it out. Stick it in front
of the people that need to see it.
I don't care whether get get the manipulators
out there. Force them to say it because
they're completely audience captured because they're not honest.
I'm not honest. Can't talk right now. My
point, though, is as long as this gets
in front of people, that's what we really
care about. But,
But, of course, this is the kind of
thing you're getting from the q and on
Trump supporting team, which you could watch it.
It simply just goes, make fun of five
v chess all you want, but and just
all it does is just a compilation of
everyone of them going, thank you, Trump. Thank
you. We appreciate you, Trump. Thank you, Trump.
Oh, good. So it's okay to sell your
soul to the devil as long as he
thanks you for it. Awesome.
The kind of mental gymnastics going on blows
the mind. Now lastly,
Melania put this out at this same conversation.
Oh, really, technically, not the same did not
at that dinner, but it's the same grouping.
It's the same element. We're talking about the
AI
direction.
And it's just kind of alarming what she's
saying. And this is what Lizzie Anne put
out.
Keep cheering for your AI surveillance prison cities.
They're rising up around you.
Cars now steer themselves
through our cities.
Robots
hold steady hands in the operating room,
and drones are redefining
the future of war.
Innovations
of first generation
humanoids,
factory automation,
and autonomous
vehicles
have surged from private sector investment.
Every one of these advancements,
it's powered by AI.
The robots
are here.
Our future is no longer
science fiction.
Oh, good. Because we clearly we were all
fighting for that future. Right? We voted for
it. He had a mandate.
No. No. That's exactly what you said Biden
was rolling in, and you were fighting that.
Now it seems as long as it's the
red, you know, red tinted version of it,
I guess it's okay.
It's just it's it's just sad how many
of these dip, you know, obvious manipulators are
out there and how much influence they're get
they're given.
Now I'm gonna go pass this for tonight.
The next show, we'll we'll jump into this,
but just, you know, the the insane reality
around this bombing of this boat, whatever it
really was, there's zero evidence to back up
who they were, what they were carrying, or
and whether or not they were even working
for, you know, either Venezuela or the gang
that they claim Maduro supports or or runs,
which he doesn't. And David already admitted that,
by the way, when it suited their interest
last time. It's just all lazy. But, you
know, Nixaurs of the of the world are
going hooray because, you know, it's okay if
we can just execute people in international waters
who whether or not they were drill you
know, carrying drugs, there's no US jurisdiction to
just murder people in the middle of the
ocean. You know? Because what if they weren't
carrying drugs? What if they were doing it
for a intelligence operation like the CIA does
all the time? What if this wasn't an
area where the drugs aren't illegal? What if
in this country, they are okay with drug?
Like, you realize it's just not okay or
allowable or within the law in any context
for any government to unilaterally execute people with
no process
that they claim are doing something. And even
even, like, as small as I really do
argue as small as drug trafficking
in the bigger context of things, especially since
that is something that is not the government's
play. The idea that they can tell you
what you can, can't put in your body
is ridiculous.
But that's a different point. The reality is
they have never proven what actually happened. They
can't prove that these people who they said
they were. But even if they did, even
if everything they said was true, they still,
in shocking fashion, violated the international law.
But we'll go through this.
Peace president, clearly. Right?
Or that Hegseth literally just declared he has
absolute authority to kill suspected drug dealers.
Now, again, I actually think this speaks to
their stupidity. Like, their lack of like, these
people are the junior team. They don't know
what they're talking about. They don't even understand
the constitute. They they pretend they do, but
I I and I this is I mean,
you could argue that in one sense, it's
them just trying to take power. I don't
think they're the ones even in power, if
you get my drift. And I think at
the end of the day, this is them
just, you know, it's like Noam saying that
she could that she can suspend
habeas corpus or because Lincoln did it. Or,
you know, they're rather than it's, habeas corpus
is the right for the president to suspend.
You know, that's what
she said. Just
unparalleled stupidity.
My point over all of it is no
matter their their reasoning, this is illegal. This
is authoritarian,
guys. This is what we are fighting.
And as Melnick points out, the vast majority
of drug traffickers are US citizens. So let
that sink in. How that works?
The illegalities of it, the reality that appears
to have not even been what they claimed,
all this is coming out. It'll keep developing.
We'll talk about it soon. As Derek says,
MAGA and conservatives
cheering on the bombing of a boat in
the international waters should just drop the pretense
of giving an SHIT about the constitution and
law and order. This was obviously a violation
of both with no evidence provided, no trial,
etcetera.
Now it doesn't matter what you think. That's
the fact. That is the
undeniable reality, but yet you've got people like
this guy
going, yeah. I'm a lawyer too. I was
an army officer, and I think we ought
to kill them all. Well, then all you're
saying is I don't have principles. That's all
that means. Now even if you agree with
him, you can say that, well, the law
says this and the prince my principals argue
that I but I would like that to
happen, but I you know, that that's a
fair statement.
He's simply saying, I don't care. If it's
I want this to happen. Therefore, the law
and the principles don't matter, which means you
don't respect either.
JD Vance came out and said, kill the
cartel members. Oh, you mean the ones you
never even verified were that?
Rand Paul comes out and says,
I don't give an s h I t
Vance says killing people he accuses of a
crime is the highest and best use of
the military? Did he ever read To Kill
a Mockingbird?
Now what I laughed about that for is
that people like this.
Sorry. I'm trying to rush through this.
Damn it. Where was that?
Right there. Cat turd says, hundred thousand fentanyl
deaths in The US in one year. Have
you read or killed Mockingbird? Rand Paul. How
much do you wanna bet he doesn't even
know what the reference means? Wouldn't surprise me
at all. This guy is not smart. The
reality is,
obviously, first of all, it's against the law.
That's the point. So hundred thousand and and
by the way, pretty sure he extra zero
there. Outcome does not justify the action. This
is not the, you know, the Machiavellian mindset.
You don't murder them because look at what
they're still a they're like, it's the same
as anything. There's a process that these people
don't care about when it goes along with
what they like because they're children.
But the reality is the is the the
moral of the story, the point of killing
somebody without fully understanding what went down without,
you know, this is what we saw with
the El Salvadorian conversation or Salvadorian conversation. These
people cheered it on because they don't really
care about what they claim they're fighting for.
As, you know, Vance, everyone everyone's calling out
that point.
Neocons who support the feds murdering people without
due process, forget the first rule of politics.
Whatever power you give the government today will
be used against you tomorrow. And this guy
says, good three times.
Shame Sally hates America and wants to see
him killed.
Oh, so now Sal has America because he
understands that government works against you. Like, I
think we're genuinely dealing with the dumbest people
in the room. They have they have got
people marshaled up that have no clue what's
really going on. They're run by emotions and
partisan ideas,
and they're far too influential right now. But
that works for a broken power structure that
wants to just rough shot over everything.
Al Jones, US military destroys Trenton and Robert
Boat.
Boom. And I said, boom. You're a hypocrite.
What a clown, guys. These people should be
laughed at.
Of course, the Trump officials have canceled a
briefing because it became clear to them that
everybody is calling this out in in the
sense of what matters to them. People aren't
okay with it because it's a crime, guys.
There's an example of something else that happened
with seal team six in North Korea.
There's another report that shows you what they're
doing all over the world. It's from a
while ago. Right? But it's Trump's last administration.
They went to plant a listening device in
North Korea. The operation went sideways within minutes
when a fishing boat was unexpectedly at a
landing site.
They murdered them, killed everyone on board, sunk
the bodies, and fled. Congress never told.
Yeah. The good guys. Right, guys? The good
guys. Don't forget there. They're always the good
guys. No matter how many innocent people they
murder to hide that they were breaking the
law.
Always the good guys.
But don't worry.
Cash and cash and Bongino. We're going after
all the cartels. Oh, you mean the gang
members you arbitrarily create cartels out of. Right?
Not the real ones. Not the ones you
work with. Not those ones. Right? We're gonna
go after the ones that we are pretending
are gang members, like the people you sent
to El Salvador. These are just cloud these
seriously,
we're watching the like, these people,
with how much power they have, it's why
it's alarming, are just like the the the
way they conduct themselves.
It's transparent. It's reactive. They're not they don't
have foresight. They're not thinking through these agendas.
They're not planning. They're just reacting to what's
going on in front of them, and people
see it.
You see it. That's why we're here. I
mean, I wouldn't be I wouldn't have any
level of success if people weren't out there
aware of what's going on. You know? I
mean, all we're really doing, guys, when it
comes to these politicians, when it comes to
these people, that's what question everything really means.
We are questioning them entirely. And even if
they do,
what we think is right.
Massey, for example, does something that I'm like,
okay. I agree with that. You don't then
just blindly jump in and support them. Right?
You hope for
the right actions, the right outcome, the long
term commitment, and you wait for them to
expose themselves, everyone.
And if they never do, all the better.
But you never stop waiting. You never stop
waiting for something to show you that they're
not who they claim they are. That's the
only way to deal with politicians. That doesn't
mean that you have to assume that they're
bad either. That's what being objective means. You
just wait for the data to guide you.
If you just go at everything like that,
you won't be fooled. No. I shouldn't say
it like that. You, you know, you may
things you could still get misled. Right? But
you won't be fooled like we're seeing today
because you will be questioning. And if you
watch our track record, if you watch this
platform, we see things largely ahead of most
others because we're not being pulled in partisan
directions. We're objectively looking at what happens like
with COVID and reporting to you as it
comes immediately with objective out, you know, this
is what I see based on the precedents.
What have they done before? What are they
planning? It's really not that difficult.
And
our track record speaks for itself.
So thank you for continuing to be here
and calling these things out. The change is
happening rapidly in front of us and not
in a good way. Right? It's because
truly,
everything in me tells me because that change
was already happening in the right way. It
was already happening. People were already changing. Things
were evolving, and it was out of their
control. And this is about making sure they
don't lose power, which is all these people
really need, where all they really ever fight
for is maintaining control over your life. And
they know if they lose power, well, they
go to jail.
Right? If they lose power, they know somebody
else is powerful, and they know what they
would do in that position. So they fight
with everything to make sure that they don't
lose that power.
That's all they care about. Help us fight
that. Help us call it out. Help us
expose it. Help us get back to the
place where we're seeing that real change continue.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question
everything. Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.