All
gene based vaccines,
independent of manufacturers,
produce the same result
in the vaccinees.
He has looked at fifteen
in the last four days. The number has
been increased to seventy
individuals who died after vaccination.
These will be who died at home,
at work, in the car,
doing their sports,
etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
There's no question now anymore
about what is going on.
And the answer is
in the organs of these people.
In ninety percent,
he found
clear
evidence
for autoimmune
self attack
by killer lymphocytes.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Reality. Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 09/02/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
A lot more to talk about than I
expected today, which, you know, as you know,
to especially today, it's always like that it
feels. But in in particular, more than the
the weird usual that we have today, if
that makes sense. But there is a lot
that I wanted to include today that I
think might make this quite a long show,
but I'm sure some of you like that.
But we are starting late today, at least
on my in from my perspective. And so
we're gonna try to get right into this.
It's it's, you know, later for somebody some
I think half the audience that watches this
show is probably sleeping right now, but we'll
we'll get this out for everybody so they
can watch it tomorrow in general. But really
important developments around most of the topics we've
been covering that I think are important to
make sure that you see. We'll kinda start
with the follow-up,
you know, additional points to yesterday's show where
we kind of left off. I mean, the
May the major thing from yesterday's show, you
know, really, it was about the warp speed
discussion from Trump. And I I'm still completely
baffled.
People that I think know better
are acting like they don't know that that
statement he put out like, pretending that that
is him saying he knows it's wrong, and
we're gonna call it out. It's just literally
not what it says, and it's kind of
frustrating that we have to play this kind
of,
you know, make believe game or, like, this
weird but it's it it does say that,
you know, we're looking into it. But if
you understand what we're what it says, it's
clearly about, like you know, if you read
it, well, we'll point to it as we
go through again today. I actually wait. I
didn't think we're gonna point to the statement,
but go over the warp speed points. But
the Trump basically says that Pfizer's numbers that
he's seen are clearly great. He says great
with all capitals.
Why you then think that means he's gonna
go after it? I really don't know. On
top of the fact that he's, like, completely
intertwined with all the problems of that thing.
It's just it's sad. But so we were
talking about the Warp Speed statement
and how that overlapped with the CDC conversation
and the, you know, the shots and everything
they're still doing, which we're gonna start with
today, and how that overlapped with Jim O'Neil
in the CDC position now.
And he is a a, you know, a
a transhumanist
not a joke, by the way, literally connected
to Aubrey de Grey, who is the head
of the we went over all it yesterday.
Transhumanist longevity expert, all funded by Teal, all
of which are really, like, obsessively focused on
extending their lives. And that's and they're all
really excited about the fact that Jim O'Neil's
in that position and how he connects with
this whole direction. And then talking about how
that overlaps with the conversation of the kind
of technocratic
push that's happening and that and then jumping
to the end was a lot in between
there, the point of the AI Gaza smart
city, which if you still haven't checked seen
that, there are some of these ridiculous partisans
out there who are doing their best to
gaslight about what that is. It regardless of
the new point of the information, this has
been going on a long time, as you
know, because you watch this show. The the
plan around Gaza has been reasserted at different
points in in in the last twenty years
very clearly for, like, the same kind of
outcome. And so the point was that this
is not just a takeover, here's the new
plan, but smart city, fifteen minute city, digital
ID, to digita
trackable, surveillable digital money. Every single part of
what we've been warning about, they're planning, or
they say they are, in regard to what's
coming in Gaza.
So great reset, just like we've been telling
you from a different angle. So all that's,
you know, briefly, but a lot more to
it we went over yesterday. Today, we're gonna
start with the follow ups in that regard
that I think are important or, technically, an
interesting point that I wanted to discuss that
we started with on AM Wake Up around
partisanship,
but then talk about a point about Epstein,
Maxwell, that I think you should see in
a very immediately recent development as of, like,
the last hour or a little bit before
that where the oversight committee has just suddenly
released thousands of documents around Epstein, which feels
weirdly timed since there's a big thing that's
supposed to happen tomorrow. By the way, Derek
is in DC right now. We might get
some live coverage about that and other things
he's focusing on.
But interesting timing, and we'll go over that.
And Massey's,
kind of press conference plan for tomorrow of
the Epstein victims. I think it's weird timing,
but most of you guys can decide for
yourselves.
Talk about the overlap of the kind of,
I guess, more on the warp feed point
as I was saying in regard to the
different additional points that I think you should
see, but then how that dovetails with the
point of today, which is the, microarray
is with the words that's used often in
that, but just the the vaccine patches that
you've heard that we've talked about, that a
lot of us have pointed to, that gat
Gats Gates is adamantly
I mean, before, very much so, and now,
again, recently talking about how that's the new
direction
and showing you that this is from 2025.
BARDA and the Trump administration are now leaning
into this direction. And not just the patches,
which might not even be that big of
a story to most with all that's going
on, but mRNA patches, which are coming, as
well as DNA versions of it. And it's
just, you know, it's the extension of the
same thing. That's not what winning looks like.
That's not what Maha's direction was about. And
you all know that, the honest ones out
there. And we'll go over that with a
couple of overlaps to quantum dots and the
way that this is essentially like a,
you know, backdoor vaccine passport kind of idea.
Like, not the first one, by the way.
I will say with Trump's, like, tracking system.
It's the same idea. They're they're creating the
the kind of sidestep access to the same
things without calling it the same thing.
We're gonna talk about
Israel in today's conversation,
but we'll we'll segue between these things and
the overlap between technology and Israel and how
that works. And we'll talk about the infiltration
of Israel and how that overlaps with the
larger point of what's going on in this
country around martial law
and about Chicago, apparently, being the next focal
point, and and the interesting,
numbers thrown out around that and DC that
are obviously not true, and I don't know
why that's hard for people to recognize. And
then we'll talk about some overlap part you
know, Israel with some really hard stuff to
talk about, to be honest, but stuff that
you need to see. And then talk about,
if we have time I mean, you know,
any number of these sections I may decide
to skip if we don't have time, but
talking about Israel toward the end in regard
to what's going on, not kind of with
the omission for the most part of the
Gaza plan and and just keeping you up
to date about what's going on to the
human lives that are being taken in is
in occupied
Palestine.
And it's important for you to see that,
and just it just doesn't slow down. And
if we have time, we'll talk about,
overlapping points with with Venezuela,
overlapping points with a couple of other foreign
policy conversations.
I kinda almost wanted to start with this
because it was so immediate, but, I mean,
you might have seen Trump announcing that they
fired on some like, apparently destroyed some speedboat
claiming it was a bunch of terrorists trying
to do Aragua, which aren't even technically terrorists
by anybody's definition other than The US is
kind of faux national emergency.
Just it's a gang, and they're horrible. Yeah.
They're gang for sure, but it's not terrorism.
And on top of that, if they were
trafficking drugs in a boat that they targeted
with a drone strike,
I mean, do they know they were gang
members? First of all, I'm not sure how
they could prove that. Secondarily, I'm pretty sure
trafficking of drugs does not carry a criminal,
you know, a a capital punishment of of
death.
So, it's just this is a crazy moment
in regard to what they're doing, but if
we don't get into it full today, we'll
talk about it in the next show, possibly
tomorrow, actually more likely the day after that,
but maybe tomorrow,
just because it's insane to watch what's going
on. And I don't think it has anything
to do with trafficking drugs. As I've said
many times over the years, Colombia, a chief
ally of NATO and The United States, is
the leading trafficker of cocaine in the world
and no one cares about that except over
here, we're gonna make this a narrative about
Maduro because every other reason they obviously have
long been trying to go after Venezuela. It's
pretty consistent with different reasons, like every other
clumsy thing the US government seems to do
today. And so it's important to see that
Trump is just carrying out that same old
thing, the peace president,
as he bombs vessels in the middle of
water with no legal justification, as he continues
bombing, you know, Somalia. I mean, everywhere you
wanna talk about. It's not what we were
promised, but that's maybe for the end of
the show today. So let's start today
with a couple of points that I wanted
you to see that I thought were very
interesting in regard to, well, first actually, the
first one, this this one I wanted you
to see in regard to the independent media
token. This is something that, Corey shared out
today. So just in case you didn't see
this, I interviewed Corey about this. Actually, let
me grab that really quickly. I forgot to
get the interview.
Shoot. I'll also go back and grab it.
I don't know why that's not popping up.
It's weird. I just did it. Well, I
know it's in there. Well, I'll grab that
on the way out. That that's just the
interview you recently did, both the Super Bee
on Substack and the website. And And it
said with Corey Hughes about the independent media
token.
Now what's important to see about this is,
one, I get people's skepticism about all this
stuff. I share it with you. What's interesting
about this is, you know, a few major
points.
First of all, from my perspective, I believe
Corey's doing this for that reason. I believe
Corey has good intentions with all this. That's
not that you should blindly accept that. Question
at all. Question us. Question every part of
it. What I think is important is that
this is being built in a way that
is not about some gimmick, not about some
like, this is not about some fast money
making idea. This is not going how it's
gonna work.
If people wanted to invest in this, consider
it like this. I was thinking about this
earlier.
It's a crypto that you can buy, you
know, spend a couple dollars, spend a $100,
go buy whatever you want. Think of it
like if you're gonna donate to independent media,
me, anybody else, and give them a donation,
think of it in the same way in
my opinion because this is not gonna be
something that you invest in and you get
some immediate return on. This is a long
term kind of
effort to create a a grant system for
independent media. That's really what this comes down
to. So the idea is that the more
that this grows and people buy into it,
the the funds that are generated will then
be used to be get to give, you
know,
interest free. You know, grants are without it,
but to make sure it's clear to people,
interest free, not alone, like, just giving people
money because of the board the board decides
that somebody deserves it, whether they're making a
documentary, whether they're an up and coming independent
media person that's being censored. You know? I'll
I'll be a part of this, and we
can discuss amongst ourselves what we think some
you know, somebody should is deserving of it.
And so the point is that that is
something that in itself, if that continues to
work,
will grow into something that is beneficial to
everybody. And then maybe in the long term,
by investing in this, that will grow because
it's a,
you know, a workable, sustainable system that is
helping independent media. If you build it, they
will come kind of a thing. Right? So
that's what's very different about this. Also, you
know, I think the overarching point is that
this is about trying to
put money into the hands of independent media
that would otherwise never see that. And speaking
from experience here, guys, it is wildly difficult
in this field, especially if we're doing the
right things for the right reasons, as I
would see it, to to to really get
a leg up. Right? And so this is
how this was built. Now, that doesn't mean
it's gonna succeed. Maybe maybe it doesn't succeed
because it doesn't get enough investment. Maybe it's
because it's, you know, the the way he's
doing this, which I argue is the right
way. Apparently, everybody else is just gaining the
whole thing, which I think we know the
system works like that, the crypto field, in
order to keep the money going. Like, he's
doing this the honest, correct way. We went
over it in the interview, which may be
to his detriment, but I respect that more
than anything. Anyway, I just want you guys
to see this because I believe that this
could end up doing something that could really
help this field, and I really don't know
how people would try to make, which I
already see them doing so, something like this
into something other than what it is. It
may not succeed, but it's clearly built on
the idea of supporting people who may need
it. And that's all transparent.
Now, you know, keep watch it. You know?
That this is what's important, as Corey says.
As as he writes right there, know your
team. You know who's involved. You can watch
what they're doing. Anyway, I just wanted you
to see that because I really do hope,
like, things like this, whether around crypto or
just anything else that might not be as
as a red flag to people, that we
can lean into the right things for the
right reasons around stuff like this and stop,
you know, profiting all of the morons out
there that just tap into the status quo.
You know? It's it's frustrating how often that
happens today. So that'll be included, the link
and everything else there for you for you
guys. Oh, and then what the post was
was Corey starting today. Apparently, I was the
first one.
Sent out the,
creator capital fund, which was, like, I guess,
a million tokens in in in regard to
the people that were gonna be on the
board. And so that's what this is about,
just kind of the beginning moment of of
starting this up. So if you if you
think that's something important,
go it's on any platform that it's existing.
You can go buy some. You know, a
dollar will get you quite a many because
it's, you know, zero zero zero and so
on. So if you wanna support it, go
for it. Now let's talk about some partisan
points to start.
And I think this is just for us
it just kinda set the tone here. Nick's
order says and this is the on September
1, all the leftist, baselessly making claims about
Trump's health, didn't say a damn thing when
he had bumbling corpse occupying the okay. Right.
Yeah. The whole back and forth. Right? How
fun this always is. They didn't do it
when we were saying it. You know, it's
like it just it's so irritating, and and
always, the point is yes, there's plenty of
ridiculous partisans just like you're being ridiculous, Nick,
in the other way that didn't wanna see
and pretended like it wasn't obvious that Biden
was drooling in his seat. Right? It's stupid
and we all saw that. That wasn't a
partisan thing, that was idiots who didn't wanna
acknowledge the truth. But, yes, for that was
because they had a partisan blind spot or
didn't care. Well, Trump is old too. Now
I'm not even remotely saying that Trump is
in the same position as Biden. At least
I can't see that right now. But are
we do you understand that he's an old
person and he very clearly does have the
issues that we that many other people are
dealing with? And so whether or not he
has something going on, I don't even care
quite frankly unless it's something that is immediately
affecting, you know, something that we care about.
For me, just the conversation swirling about whether
he's walking on the steps funny happens every
single time.
Frankly, I'm tired of it. And so this
is funny because it's basically as some people
are saying Trump might have some issues, which
gets drowned out by the idiots who are
going, Trump's dead. And it's all which is
part of the whole back and forth. The
ones who said Biden was completely fine are
the same ones who are saying Trump's completely
fine. The ones who are saying Trump is
dying are the one you know, it's the
same kind of hyperbolic nonsense on both sides
of the paradigm. My point is that he
goes, they didn't do it when he was
happening. You know? So it's like this game
of back and forth when anybody who's not
in the partisan game can look and be
objective about it. Yeah. Biden had
senility. Yes. Trump is also dealing with health
issues here and there. And whether he's old
and it's not some big massive scandal. But
I said, can we all just start making
fun of all these partisan clowns, both sides?
They love to be outraged back and forth
about the same stupid things. It's all it
is all just so stale and tired. Meanwhile,
the Knicks of the world help everybody ignore
what actually matters.
So this is an image of the Biden
kind of standing still and acting funny. You
know? Again, don't hear this as me claiming
that Trump is in the same position. It's
just not. But it's the way that they
deal with these things. Now to be clear,
there were plenty of Democrats who were being
honest about that. But, see, what happens is
the Knicks of the world frame the idiot,
more on partisan team sport players on the
other side and the mainstream media as what
everybody on the left thinks. Right? Just like
the idiot, moron, partisan lefts on the team
sport left frame
everybody on the right as Jones and Nick
Sorter and Pat Dirp. That's not the truth.
It's just not. And you can clearly look
if you care.
Most people, I think, are pretty weirded out
by what's going on right now, to varying
degrees, obviously,
but that's the joke of it all, right,
is that they always love to point at
them and say they're all the same when
it's just not the case either way. But
keeping you locked into that false perception is
what keeps their whatever you wanna fill in
the blank with rolling. You know?
So keeping that in mind, this is something
we talked about this morning on Aim Wake
Up that I thought was interesting. Now the
only reason I think this I mean, this
is probably the least important thing we're talking
about today, but it is interesting to me
for a couple of reasons. Now we talked
about this morning this because it came up
and Steve brought it up on the show,
and because I I point out quite a
bit the lies that have been swinging around
per you know, since the current administration, but
pretty obviously over the years for Alex Jones
in particular.
And I'm not talking about opinions. I'm talking
about provable,
on the surface, lies or, in other cases,
just being wrong, but lies that you can
prove. He knows he's lying. I've been over
this many times.
Different than just being wrong and not covering
for it. But the point is we've also
talked about all the people over the years
that have left because they're dishonest, because they
lie about things. They don't check their sources.
You know, David Knight, Greg Rees, all these
people. A lot of them.
So what's interesting is so before I even
get to Owen Shroyer, the point is that
this morning, we talked about this. And somebody
had recently asked me, you know, why are
you concerned about Alex Jones? And I said,
okay. It's a fair question. Right? Because in
the past,
I haven't really talked about this kind of
stuff. I tried to stay away from it.
And I said this this
morning. My thought over the time was like,
I've really okay. We can see right now
that what's going on in independent media is
different than it has been. Everyone
David Icke and all the people that have
been doing this a long time, we're all
very clear about that. And that's not I
think that I think we can all see
it is the point. But they're the ones
that have kinda really highlighted the mainstream alternative
media
phenomenon. Now
when we were talk like, when we talk
about Fox News and CNN, all over all
for the however long anyone's ever been doing
this, what do we do? We look at
the mainstream media. This is what they're trying
to do. Here's how they're trying to manipulate
you. Right?
So, is that not the exact same thing?
Jones has more followers and views in most
cases than corporate media. So, if we're gonna
we need to shift our understanding of what
the mainstream
propaganda machine is. I think it's people like
him. I think it's shifted to the mainstream
alternative media. And this is not a unique
opinion, but we just don't kind of follow
it to the point which is that we
should be treating them the same way, which
is why I started doing this. Calling out
these ways that he's clearly deceiving, not because
I'm like, this guy sucked and I hate
him, which it's hate is a strong word
for anything like this. You shouldn't you should
let very few things rise to the level
of hate in your life. But it's clear
that they're dishonest and deceptive. And if you
know that they're reaching millions of people, well,
then it's the same as saying, Look at
a Fox and CNN are lying to you.
Right? So that's just a quick understanding of
why I've even talked about this stuff. So
what's interesting is as this developed, and I've
been really saying, look at what's going on,
just pay attention to how deceptive it is,
look at go back to Bill Cooper and
how he told you that Jones was a
manipulative,
lying person.
And then once Cooper went out of the
picture, Jones has always pretended like he was
the one that predicted nine '11. It's just
a very grifty whole thing.
And then you got people like David Knight,
Greg Rees, you know? I mean, anybody you
know, I don't all these people that we've
talked about over the years that have left
from Burmas to TrueStream Media, that have said
similar things about what they're doing.
So today, ours I think, yeah, I think
it was earlier today, Owen Schroeder kind of,
like, specked in a, you know, kind of
burning the the house down kind of way
left Infowars.
Now I'm not gonna go into all of
the points. I just wanna play one clip
about it because I just think it's worth
making the point.
But this or Orin Shroyer leaves Infowars saying
Alex Jones was not easy to work for
because he was consistent constantly
pestering him about being too negative
and too anti Trump. Now there's more than
that, and you can listen to it for
yourself. It's also about the fact that he
clearly was controlling what he was saying, and
he go he talks about all this, which
is not which is the same thing we've
heard from just about everybody else we've talked
about.
So and this was the this just says,
info former Infowars host, Owen Shroyer, reveals that
Alex Jones has not given him a raise
since 2018 and that he was living paycheck
to paycheck, citing concerns of his raising cost
of living. He says he no longer felt
it was worth it because I, quote, can't
even control my own show.
That's that's that's mainstream media. Because he was
constantly interrupting him, constantly telling him what to
cover, constantly telling him what to guest guest
to have on. Now what's what's kind of
hilariously about this is that
Donald, there's rather, oh, first,
Derek Rose just shared back to David Knight.
Well, let me just do this actually. I'll
come back to that since there was another
point that I wanted to share here that
connects to Reese. So this is what happened
today.
So I didn't actually know this. Apparently, that's
Alex Jones' son.
But so Jones posted this where he breaks
onto the set, and you can watch the
full clip. They're in the middle of their
show, like, literally in the middle of their
reporting morning show, and he just, like, bursts
into the show and does exactly what Owen
said he does and why he left.
You know, it's it's I mean, part of
me, to be honest, is I'm I'm just
kinda showing you what's happening, whether this feels
very contrived.
Like, if you watch I'm gonna play this
just this one for you. It feels
WWF to me. Now whether that's what Jones
is doing and it's not and Owen genuinely
left or whether the whole thing is contrived,
we should be asking that very much so.
Just like the rest of the breaking like,
when Tucker leaves corporate media, you know, it's
like, this is the new corporate. So consider
these things. But also consider that some you
know, that he left because he recognized it.
Either way, question that it's all some kind
of, like, organized thing, and you'll get what
I'm saying when you listen to this. Either
way, even if it is all contrived, doesn't
change the reality of all these points up
until now and that this person is trying
to deceive you. That just makes it more
obvious.
So here's what he posted.
It looks like, Harrison and his son are
sitting there, which are clearly embarrassed by what
he does, and it just makes someone's point,
to be honest.
It's like Andrew Skywalker's in combat. Can can
we sing a song? Hey. Hey. When I
go on the air when I go on
the air, I'm letting you have it, Troyer.
You Oh, you are on the air. You're
interrupting their show. Jab your brother in this
operation in the back, and you're a fucking
liar. Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot to tell
you this cursing. He curses. Oh, yeah. I
mean, I I agree. I didn't I didn't
really tell him to tell you where. So
he leaves and comes back in. You know,
Think about the lack of decorum. They're literally
in the middle of production producing a show.
I just think that is so ins I
mean, that's insulting. That shows complete disregard for
their what they're doing. There's no respect there
at all. Normal Mhmm.
To go and and and do innuendo that
you've been censored and controlled. God, it goes
because you're talking bad about Trump and this
stuff. And then later, hours ago, oh, no.
He didn't censor me. All set up to
boost himself
off lying about me.
I don't ever get involved in infighting, but
I've known somebody ten years and they've been
my friend. But he's gotten really dark, didn't
talk to the crew the last two years.
And and and so it's like it's just
like a different person.
I'm not here to be the villain Mhmm.
For somebody's lie.
So wait till you hear his phone call
me. I mean, his son is very clearly
making weird faces. Like,
like, you saw him. He put his eyebrows.
Like, that's a lot, especially as, you know,
the son of somebody doing this. And I
just this is very childish,
the whole thing. That's very like, if, like,
if it was in the middle of a
show and something happened and I was forced
to discuss it, you know, maybe I would
act, but you'll never that's just I I
can't even imagine a world in which I
would break onto a set and start screaming
in a, like, a tantrum way about something
that happened that has nothing to do with
what they were talking about. Like, that is
such narcissism. It blows my mind.
Yesterday.
He literally talked to me like it was
a crack whore. He was a pimp. He's
like, yeah. Well, if you're desperate, pay me
more, I'll stay. But I'm gonna promote my
new show on Infowars.
Wow. This is gonna hit the high road.
Nice. I might do a week. I was
like, man, this is gonna be my feelings.
Look at that.
Yeah. I'd be embarrassed too. Dude, no. It's
alright. You don't have to come in. I
hung up, started fucking crying, and then he
goes on fucking air and lies about me.
Fuck you, you fucking piece of shit. I
won't fucking take people stabbing me in the
back anymore. Fuck you.
Get ready.
Like yeah. That feels very contrived, by the
way. Whether Jones just kinda did that to
make himself feel strong or that's some organized
thing with the both of them, it does.
I agree. A lot of people have pointed
out that it feels very
WWF,
you know, which is what this kinda thing
is and, you know, what they do with
these kind of platforms do.
Anyway, so that's really embarrassing. And so that's
what I said. That's and can I you
can see the embarrassment on their faces, and
he posted that himself?
No. And, also, here's his son, Rex, who
just says, wow. This guy says, holy s
h I d.
He responds by saying guy says that was
something, and he goes, that was awful. Like,
just so it's very clear, his son was
embarrassed by that, which speaks for itself.
And Greg Reese simply says, Owen Shroyer did
the right thing.
I think this speaks volumes. Now some the
people that wanna defend this person and is
often weird and deceptive information
will act like we're being petty. But if
you can if you understand what this is
about and you have a person like this
that reaches more people in the corporate media
who is deliberately, in my opinion, deceiving people
about information that's very partisan
and covering for a very clear person that
I think is being infiltrated by a foreign
government,
You know, is that not important? Is that
not very clearly a monumentally important thing to
recognize that that that kind of power struck?
You know, obviously, it is. And that's why
we're covering this.
Eric Brose says seems worth sharing again, and
this is David Knight back in his old
interview discussing why he pulled away from Jones.
And guess what? It's the exact same reasoning.
Now I just wanted to point out again
that this is an one of these ongoing
things that I bet isn't going to materialize
about the big, big, big updates he says
are coming about Obama and and, quote, Comer
and, you know, all all of it or
rather, Comey.
And these types of news just adds to
it. Well, here's back when he said Klaus
Schwab, Bill Gates, and Fauci, and Hillary were
all gonna go to jail for sure in
twenty four twenty twenty four.
You know, look. You can say I think
that it should happen, but like I keep
showing you, it is this is happening. My
inside sources like, this is this clip here.
I just heard inter I had many talks
with multiple inside people at DOJ, and they
all tell me it's all coming down. Well,
historically, that's
not usually what happens. Whatever is things he'll
tell that you've seen the show. You've seen
how consistently that doesn't turn out, but maybe
it will tomorrow. I'm always open to that.
But I think it's about consistency here, guys,
and that's what matters. That's why you think
you watch this show. Because whether I'm right
or wrong, and I think the track record
speaks for itself in that regard,
if I'm ever actually incorrect about something or
I miss
I always follow-up.
That's what matters. Now Now talking about Epstein,
which by the way oh, yeah. What's that
story again? What what what was Epstein? You're
still talking about Epstein? Yeah. That whole story?
Well, Bennet Johnson post this of Bongino.
Deputy FBI director Bongino sends a scathing message
to the deep state,
which is just that framing always makes you
laugh. What? To to what? Do you mean
the democrats? Or or, you know, or is
it does he have his, like, their mailing
address? Do you just do you just send
you text it? Do you tag them deep
state? You know? What do you mean? It's
just a message to the deep state. Like,
it's just so dumb the way and I'm
not suggesting there's not an unelected power structure.
It's just such a
like, a simp overly simplified way to always
address this, like, it's what they do. But
he goes, if you're a corrupt politician, we're
gonna find you.
Well,
let me ask you about,
you're gonna be looking into when Cash and
Pam,
any potential collusion between the DOJ,
Leticia James,
the novel legal theory of Alvin Bragg or
Nathan Wade or I mean, really think about
the craziness of continually
focusing back,
which I'm not saying there's plenty of criminal
activity we can highlight. And, yes, a lot
of it was even done from a partisan
perspective. In some cases, you could even argue
against Trump.
But look at what's going on in the
world right now. Look at how much I
mean, even I mean, almost in particular,
what this administration is doing in front of
you. But even then, oh, even other even
things that are happening on things that you
wouldn't even associate with Trump or things that
are happening in foreign policy or Israel, any
number of things. And you guys are continually
focusing back on the election conversation on I
mean, there you have to understand why that
is.
Honey, Willis and the DOJ.
Is that something has anything come up? Is
there any way to determine whether or not
evidence was destroyed in any of these cases?
I'm I'm gonna almost guarantee it is. Right?
If they if these people left or right
have a situation where they don't you know,
can break the law to keep themselves out
of jail, I guarantee you they'll do it.
That's my opinion. Well, there's always a way
to determine that. I don't wanna comment on
that specific case right now for a reason.
I don't wanna get ahead of the Department
of Justice on that, but I wanna say
this. You know, the FBI obviously has the
public corruption portfolio.
And, yes, if you are a corrupt politician
out there, if you are engaged in behavior,
you you know what you're doing,
we're gonna find you. I promise. No one
is going to get off the days of
selecting and putting your, you know, partisan bias
on and taking care of your friends. Those
days are over. You know what, Sean? I
don't have any friends. I don't want any
friends. Well, maybe outside of you and a
couple of I don't care. I didn't come
here for the money. I didn't come here
to make I know. No. You didn't go
there for the money. I could tell people
that I'm sure. Friends. I don't give a
damn about friends. I don't have any friends.
I don't want any friends. I got my
wife. I got you, and I got a
small crew of people. So I I don't
need any friends. If you want a friend
in DC, get a dog. We're coming for
you. That'll help. Yeah. Go. You say you
want a friend at DC? Right. Get a
go go get a Labradoodle and the guy
out because there are no friends. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Nonsense. Nonsense. Nonsense. So his point
was, we're gonna get you. Okay.
The rest of it was all filler and
and nonsense about how he you know, who
knows? Who cares about whether you're
you know, put your life into this job
and, you know, whatever. It's all I mean,
it could be. I'm not diminishing if that
is real. I'm just saying it's nothing
that comes down to what matters, and usually,
it's all the fluff around the sides about
trying to give you the impression of what
they want you to think they are and
how much they care. What matters to me
is outcome, action, precedent, what you do and
whether you follow through, not what you say
you're gonna do. Either way,
what about all the rest of them? Right?
What about all the other people you keep
telling us about? What about the Epstein file
conversation? What about all the people you told
us that were gonna go to jail? You
in particular on your podcast circuit. What about
Gates? What about Fauci? What about every one
of them? What about all people that supposedly
manipulated the Social Security conversation? What about all
the people that were the DOJ hangovers or
the rather the democrat hangovers in the FBI
or the democrat hangovers in every field? You
guys blamed some mysterious figure that did the
thing we didn't like, and then nobody ever
got arrested for it. But, yeah, but nobody's
gonna get away with it except everybody that
already did. And I'm willing to bet you
not a single example like,
just wait till the next example and wait
for the next thing to happen where it's
something like that, somebody who is guilty or
even Clinton or Obama or all the people
that keep telling you are gonna go to
jail and watch
how it doesn't happen.
I hope it does.
Genuinely hope because they're all criminals, including the
other side of it. But I just don't
see a world in which this makes sense.
If they they could've, if they I mean,
Trump
was supposed to go after in the beginning.
Just decided not to because, you know, they're
good people. That's what he said publicly. But
somehow we don't piece this together.
So on that Epstein or the, yeah, Epstein
point overall,
Thomas Massie
says Johnson well, first, we'll start with Melanie's
tweet here where she says the house just
added a bill to the floor,
schedule this week that would direct
the house oversight committee to, quote, continue its
ongoing investigation into Epstein
comes as GOP leaders are trying to stave
off a discharge petition forcing the release of
all the Epstein files.
Massie says Johnson just scheduled this meaningless vote
to provide political cover for those members who
don't support our bipartisan legislation to force the
release of the Epstein files.
So and the point is if is that
they're maneuvering politically to try to avoid
more information,
which, again, like I just said when we
started, this just happened today, which I think
is very interestingly timed. Now it matters what's
in there.
I'm sure there are people coming through it
right now. I saw this right before I
went live. So there's two links in there,
which I'm always skeptical about using a link
the government provides. But overall, the point is
that it has all this information.
There are clear there's a Google drive in
there that that at least appears to me
to be full of things you can click
on. And so
tell me what you find. I'll look into
it. If it's nothing new, like, every other
time before this, it's just another effort to
muddy the waters before more information actually comes
out. But I'm not saying I know that.
We'll have to wait and see what comes
out of this. If you're in the chat
and you've already looked, tell me if you
see anything important.
But here's Melanie on the on the back
of that tweet that she put out saying,
meanwhile, speaker Johnson's also privately meeting today with
some of the survivors of Epstein's abuse.
Well, that's interesting.
So let me get this straight. So
you have created another vote to kind of
stifle the effort of of of Massey to
let to to get
this information to come out.
You know that they're gonna have a a
press conference that you've all been belittling tomorrow
with these people,
and so you wanna meet with them the
day before, and meanwhile, you dump a bunch
of information out to I mean, that feels
like look. It's all up in the air.
So maybe they release all this information and
they turn and change the whole story. If
it happens tomorrow, I'll talk about it and
say, good for Mike for putting it out
there. I somehow don't think that's what's gonna
happen.
And I think ultimately, this is effort to
kind of just muddy the waters and something
you know, it seems very deceptive with the
way they've been handling us. Didn't they just
get done telling us the whole thing's a
democrat hoax?
Feels very strange to me. Now Maria Farmer,
in particular, somebody who said Trump explicitly was
involved with all this stuff.
I'll grab just the part one.
Whitney did a an audio video like, a
phone call with her. That's part two.
And just recorded the two part audio
and and basically just, you know, that, you
know, she had her story to tell. So
it's funny how people would ever try to
criticize Whitney for allowing a person like this
to tell their story, which, you know, you
were there's no like, unless you have a
counter evidence to push back on, why would
you ever go, that can't be true, or,
like, push back on somebody telling their story?
It just seems like a funny thing, but
that you take it that way. You take
it as her, just her presentation of her
story. That's that's what it's there for.
And I'll include this.
The only reason I'm saying that is because
it's like it's just question everything all the
time. Not even trying to I think what
she's saying is most likely accurate based on
everything else we have. But overall
oh, what was I saying?
Oh, you know, just that that's she'll be
one of the people that I think are
gonna be there, and they're they're all gonna
be speaking about what they have to say.
Now I guarantee you it's gonna be something
that's damaging for the Trump administration because they
all seem to be pretty upset about what
they've done with this recent Maxwell thing, what
they've done with the entire situation.
So I think there's an effort for them
to sort of downplay or hide or bury
what this will be. That's what I think.
I'll have to wait and see tomorrow.
Also, last point, Massey put this out. This
is yesterday. Our press conference with 10 Epstein,
10 Epstein victims of Epstein
at his 10 at 10:30AM
on September 3. She said he says, I
pray speaker Johnson will listen to the pleas
of these victims for justice and quit trying
to block a vote on our legislation to
release the Epstein files.
Now that's not necessarily what what they just
dumped out there. You understand? So this it's
a kind of a there's a lot what
most people actually want is whatever they have,
whether it's been at one's place or not,
that they can collect into one organizational thing
that shows the people who were involved.
It's not that difficult. You understand? And they
just refuse to do that. Trump, in fact,
tells you it's not even true. We're not
even there.
So let's talk about the overlap of this
conversation
with warp speed. And with another point we
made from yesterday, which is the show here,
Trump's warp speed, CDC's Jim O'Neill, transhumanism,
and Gaza Freedom City is actually technocratic dystopia.
So before we get to the actual point
of the overlap of the city point, oops,
I just wanna shout out to Jen Zun
here who shared this with me.
This is a a
post to this.
Vaxxis secures a $90,000,000
$90,000,000
in funding to commercialize needle free vaccination delivery
technology. That was August 25. Now we're gonna
go through that, and I'll show you very
clearly how despite it being a Australian company,
it's being funded by The United States through
BARDA.
But before that, let's talk about the the
warp speed overlap because there's a couple points
that I want you to see before we
show you yet again for what, like, the
fourth example of how they're continuing the very
same thing. They're just going further with it.
They're not going back to the same old
COVID shot. They're just making it work. They're
going even further. Self amplifying. Need needle mRNA
patches. Who god knows what else they're working
on, guys? And there's a lot of it.
There's all these nanotech ferritin shots and all
this stuff that are still clearly happening. They're
in trials and studies. It's just that it's
they're working and they're getting funding from The
United States.
This is important to overlap it with, understand
this weird kind of shift from the the
warp speed as Spiro says. Trump considers Operation
Warp Speed a part of his legacy, and
he has. He said this many times. In
the clip below, he calls himself the father
of the vaccine.
He goes, I find it hard to believe
he will walk this back and admit he's
wrong and take responsibility for all of the
harm in in the experimental mRNA shots they
caused. That you there's not only one way
to look at this, guys. You can't admit
it was a problem without him owning that
he was a part of that. But see,
he's trying to walk this tight rope where
he sort of goes like it's what he
does with everything. He tries to act like
he's some kind of third party that's just
helping out, just showing you what I see.
You know? And it's it's it's clumsy. Only
people that wanna support and fall for that.
Now w, NW Rambler points out an important
point. So here he is telling us we
just played we just went over it yesterday
that I mean, I wish I let me
grab that really quickly because I did say
it. Like, it's right here.
Oh, I it's worth reading again since this
this adds to the point.
It's Trump's, post about
warp speed.
Jeez. He he dumps so much garbage on
here.
I thought it would be right here. Let's
see. This is two days ago.
Let her just do this.
Should be two words really, but I'm sure
it'll work. There it is.
Okay. So it's just this post right here.
It's and it it is for sure from
his account. You just don't wanna have to
try to search for it. The way True
Social, like, scrunches up the post, it makes
it hard to see what what what the
full picture is. Okay. So first, here's what
he said, and then we'll show you why
this is important. So here's what he said.
And I just again, I I have to
really stress how we this is worse than
most of these other examples. Like, we talked
about gain of function where they claimed,
even people that I thought knew better, that
they ended gain of function.
But you just you read the actual post,
and it said very clearly that, no, they
were going to become the leaders in the
versions that they thought were important.
So we're gonna stop the most dangerous versions,
but then the the but still do versions
of gain function. So in no world can
you claim they stopped gain function. It's just
a it's a game of words. Really, it's
a game of stupidity.
And then they did the same thing with,
you know, more than one example, guys. It
keeps happening. USAID. They didn't stop it. They
just restructured it. It's and it's they'll admit
that later, and yet the narrative still goes
on. It's like Trump saying we defeated ISIS.
It somehow just keeps being said even though
he himself will bomb ISIS. It's just stupid.
But same point here, and I think this
is worse than all of them.
He says, it is very important that the
drug companies justify the success of the various
COVID drugs. Many people, he's clearly meaning him,
that's how he plays this, think they are
a miracle. Nobody but you and some Democrats,
apparently, that saved millions of lives. Others disagree,
with c meaning his base. With the CDC
being ripped apart over this question, I want
the answer, and I want it now. Again,
the answer he has already, that they know,
everyone in the world knows. I have been
shown information from Pfizer and others that is
extraordinary,
but they never seem to show those results
to the public. Why not? Now remember, we've
seen their data. So what he must be
referring to is something we don't see. And
it says, they go off to the next
hunt and let everyone rip themselves apart, including
Bobby Kennedy and CDC, trying to figure out
the success or failure of the drug company's
COVID work. They show me
great in capital
numbers and results.
I don't know how you misread that. And
it says, but they don't seem to be
showing them to many others.
So Pfizer has some secret database that he's
showing that shows that they're a super big
success
or that they're great numbers is what he's
claiming. And it does say right there showing
them that the they show great numbers, but
they don't wanna seem to be showing any
others. So you're keeping secret that they have
great numbers that help people. Let's realize he's
been saying the entire time that they're the
best success. They're saving lives. Okay. So if
he adds that they're showing him great numbers,
but they just don't know why he doesn't
show anybody else, it takes his willful
kind of dishonesty to not acknowledge what that
says.
And it says,
I want them to show them now to
CDC and the public, meaning show them the
numbers that are great.
Pretty easy to break down the language, and
it says, and clean up this mess. Right.
So if if if they were gonna come
out and show
bad stuff, then that would be cleaning up
the mess. Right? Cleaning up the mess is
to clear up that there's no problem, which
is he's been telling you the entire time.
One way or another, I hope Warrksbee was
as brilliant
as many say it was. The only one
saying that is you, Trump. This is very
clumsy. And then brilliant is you're quoting yourself
right there, acting like you're pointing to somebody
else. And it says, if not, we wanna
know about it and why. That is the
only example you have in there where he
even kind of feigns the investigatory
part of it.
If if it wasn't brilliant, we wanna know
why?
I can't believe people are gonna try to
pretend, people that I otherwise respect, that that
means he's going to investigate anything. It certainly
could, as anything could. But if we're gonna
be honest about what it says, I'm just
blown away by by the
either stupidity or willful dishonesty of people that
act like this just changed everything.
And frankly, again, I mean, that might insult
somebody. There are people out there that I've
pulled in our regard that were like, woo
hoo. I can't believe it. I'm like,
I just, you know, I share your hopeful
optimism, but I do not believe that's what
is actually gonna happen. I don't believe I
know that's not what it says. So, he
comes out in this document and says, Pfizer
has numbers that they show me that are
great.
And so and, and the point that I
did make just then was that he's saying,
okay. Pfizer's going to show us
whether or not this is the case.
Right. So we're gonna trust Pfizer
to show us that these things work or
don't.
That feels right, doesn't it? Because Pfizer's honest,
and we know that. Ask Brooke Jackson. Right?
I mean, she's she already called this out
in a way saying, what about this trial?
Like, it's deceptive.
So keeping that in mind, it says, I
do not think and this is this is
from the Trump statements that he very much
did say. I do not think I do
think that Pfizer I will say this. The
FDA is bureaucratically run.
Would have taken five years to get it
approved.
Would have never even had it if it
weren't for me. And I learned things, he
says. The FDA is virtually controlled by Pfizer.
Pfizer has control. Not Johnson, not and Johnson,
not Johnson and Johnson, not Moderna, but Pfizer
has control of the FDA, and it's not
a good thing.
Okay? So Pfizer being in control of the
FDA is not a good thing, but we're
gonna now trust them for the data that
shows that these things helped. So why would
it be a bad thing then if they
were in control, if you're telling us, you
know, it's broken logic, guys. He's saying what
he wants to say when he wants to
say it to try to make you think
a certain thing in the moment
everywhere you look.
I don't know why people can't see that.
I mean, I think, again, it's willful ignorance.
Brad Miller says if you believe Trump was
duped for five plus years, again, despite his
entire base screening that and booing him when
he says about the shots in public, come
on. He goes, then you must also believe
he's too stupid to be president.
I just made this point yesterday. He says,
tens of millions of Americans were smart enough
to refuse the jab.
Maybe one of them should be president. It's
a it's a good point. If Trump couldn't
see through the COVID op, how could he
see through the next op? Right? Are we
and Steve and I were laughing about this
this morning. You can't play it both ways.
You can't pretend he keeps tripping over every
single deep state ploy and then somehow is
helping fight the deep state. It just doesn't
make any sense.
Five times August says, I'll celebrate Trump's pharma
post today for no other reason than it
reignites an important conversation. I agree with that.
But he says, I'm not going to thank
him for it. Conservatives tend to salivate the
second that they hear what they want to
hear from anyone who then quickly overdose on
hope the hopium of it hopium hit. We
saw this with Zuckerberg, admitted to online censorship
and election interference.
All of a sudden, he wasn't such a
bad guy after all, and he was being
thanked and praised for finally being honest about
doing really bad things. Yeah. Without the accountability
for the things he did. Right? Oops. You
don't have to be nice all the time,
guys. He says, you we deserve the truth
a long time ago.
We've been lied to and abused in the
process.
And if and and as we've learned,
social media posts are one thing,
real action and accountability are another. Well, you've
learned it, August, because you're an honest person.
Others are still struggling with that because they
don't want to see it. Right? You can
see him say things that don't happen. It's
pretty obvious what's going on. And he goes,
we have to stop acting like peasants in
the in these moments.
Right? Because, you know, like I said, you
can go, well, the Democrats wouldn't let him.
Yeah. Even if that's true, how how many
times can that happen before you just acknowledge
that the system itself is broken? You see,
that's what they think they're doing now, which
is,
you know, breaking the system to rebuild. Like,
you know, it's always using the problems in
front of us to rationalize the next problem.
It's just look at what happened during COVID.
How long did we tell you that? The
problem will be the solution will be worse
than the problem until Trump comes out and
goes, the solution will not be worse than
the problem, and then that's exactly what happened.
So crazy.
Now I'm gonna I think I'll play some
of this. I just I was going across
this in,
I I was looking for work feed stuff
in my my files. Let's see what somebody
says down here.
The point is that,
Milkbar TV, who's done great work around this
stuff, did did a compilation
of,
you know, all the warp speed stuff. Like,
just every all the points he made, you
know, and I all play some of it.
Because, I mean, it's important. You have to
hear the the gushing, like, everyone agrees, and
we say you're in these lives. You just
need this
to argue this is somehow you know, I
think justice hubris will stop him from trying
to telling you this is not the case.
Right? But I said, just came across this
video. My files would have been perfect to
play yesterday, but here it is today.
The
past nine months, my administration
has initiated
the single greatest mobilization
in US history, pioneering, developing, and manufacturing
therapies and vaccines
in record time. Yes. In a certain way,
I'm the father of the vaccine because I
was the one that pushed it. You know,
to get it done in less than nine
months was, a miracle. No medical breakthrough of
this scope and magnitude has ever been achieved
this rapidly, this quickly,
and we're very proud of it. Joe Fauci
said it would take three to five years.
He thought it was,
something that just wouldn't be that effective because
it would take so long to get. Would
you make sure you get to the president
the information that a vaccine that you make
and start testing in a year is not
a vaccine that's deployable.
So he's asking the question, when is it
gonna be deployable?
And that is gonna be at the earliest
a year to a year and a half.
I got them done in nine months, and
it was supposed to take anywhere from five
to twelve years. If you had a different
administration with different people, what we've done would
have taken, in my opinion, three, four, five
years, and it would have
been in the FDA forever.
We I pushed the FDA
like they have never been pushed before. I
got the FDA to do things that they
it was it was pretty amazing what we
were able to do. I broke their ass.
Okay?
And you know who doesn't like me too
much? The FDA.
Because they were very bureaucratic. This is a
very bureaucratic organization.
I push them like they've never been pushed
before. President Trump is pressuring the head of
the FDA. The president wants Pfizer's vaccine authorized
today. President is threatening the head of the
FDA
that he must act now or lose his
job.
I mean, guys, just take a moment and
reflect on this. Right? Those are the shots
that killed your killed everybody.
K? There's no way you pull he is
in in whether you think he was played
or not,
he is the one that aggressively drove and
then took credit for aggressively driving the forced
release of the shot.
I mean, I look. I don't think for
a second that Fauci was, you know, somehow
the one trying to stop it. Like, clearly,
he is a central part of this larger
problem. But what's interesting about it is that
he's on record there going, we can't do
it that fast, and then Trump's the one
that forced it in. So you could argue
that he was played to to be that
scapegoat. You know, it's like I a lot
of people argue that to begin with, that
Trump in in, like, the larger scheme was
put in this position, and maybe this will
still hold true, to be, like, the scapegoat
for why all this goes awry.
Worth
considering. Like, not, you know, from, like, the
real power structures, the the the actual global
Zionist technocrat kind of machine that's not just
part of the system. You know?
But, I mean, that's I think that's good.
You watch the whole thing. I think there's
a lot more to it, but it goes
on. You know? And just
gushing gushing gushing. So I'll include this again,
by the way, which I, you know,
never
and until this becomes, like, the most watched
video in the world around this topic, I
will never think that it gets enough attention
because this is the most important conversation you're
gonna find around this
that is it
scientifically, source material, the expertise of Arna Burkhart.
It's just it's insane, and and all the
credit goes to Taylor Hudak. Pathologist Arna Burkhart,
final interview before he died in a mysterious
fashion, revealing the grave dangers of mRNA vaccines.
I really just argue if anybody out there
is skeptical,
you know, thinks you're all vaccine, anti vaxxer,
if you and and it's watch this. And
understand his credentials. Look at the way he
breaks it down. They she brings up all
the different, you know, my my cry my
I always had a problem with that. Mic
microscopy.
No. In fact, I kept the word all
wrong. The, you know, the the the lens
they these shots they have through the microscope,
and they bring them up on screen, and
they break it down. I mean, it's just
it is
unparalleled in my opinion. And that's not just
because it's on our platform. You guys have
seen it. I really do think this is
a step above most of the stuff we've
seen out there because he is the was
one of the leading experts, if not the
leading expert, in this conversation, came back out
of retirement to be able to make this
case, and then, you know, something else happened.
But just powerful. Share this with people.
Now let's not forget,
as we just talked about on August 10,
that they're leaning into the self amplifying direction.
Right? That's not a secret. And they mean
it is. People don't wanna see it. But
when they claimed they had stopped and then
the point was under the guise of ending
mRNA,
they clearly have continued the self amplifying direction.
That seems to only be growing, whether for
dogs or many different examples of COVID shots,
flu shots, all being self amplifying mRNA. And
at the moment, the least, that's even separate
from the
flu vaccine platform universal conversation, which, again, I
get the sense will somehow fold into that,
but that's we'll have to wait and see
how it goes.
But keeping this in mind and by the
way, in food, we will talk about today,
which is a very clear and obvious problem
that it's on the record.
We'll talk about the
oh, this so leave it
in
a press conference
was forced to state out loud what we'd
already been covering for a week, which is
that they'd already continued four and it started
four new shots out claiming that they ended
the shots, but they he she claimed it
was because the emergency authorization was gone even
though it's technically not when you really look
down the whole path,
that four new shots had been started anyway.
And certain people were like, breaking news, even
though, no, it wasn't brand new. She was
just forced to acknowledge it. And if you
watched TLAB, you knew it for an entire
week. But keeping that in mind that it's
not only was I right about that or
anybody else telling you that they weren't, which
people like Sasha Lapova,
who else? I think Mary Talley Bowden, for
example, was very clearly calling out the s
the self amplifying direction. There's a lot of
them out there. Is that this was them
admitting it on top of that, which just
makes it important. Not the self amplifying explicitly,
but that they were continuing
mRNA COVID shots. So this just takes it
another step further. Okay? Vaxxis,
$90,000,000
for the direction of the commercialized
needle free vaccine conversation.
Now who again just told us that, you
know, Bill Gates has been adamant about this.
So 01/06/2025.
Apparently, in this I find this really weird
the way this so it's called it's the
the actual vaccine or whatever you wanna call
this is is the, you know, like, the
antigen part of it is v x s
one two one nine.
But I found it really difficult to find
that. Overall, they're just calling it the,
like, Vaxxis, for example, using Vaxxis and using
the
microarray,
it's in here somewhere, the HD map vaccine
delivery. That's what you're finding everywhere. And I
kept going like, okay. What is the what's
the actual vaccine? Who's making it? And it's
just it's super it's weird. Now what I
think the reason is is this public private
overlap now. What you'll find out is these
groups, including Vaxess
and and other groups around it, are all
owned by private entities, and it seems like
they don't nobody even like, it's not public
information who the owner. How does that even
possible?
You find BARDA funding this stuff? I mean,
I anyway, there's weirdness around all this, and
I don't think it's necessarily some, like, this
is the one secret. I think the whole
industry is going this direction, where they're it's
becoming really shadowy and hard to define and
what you know, they just give you a
report and it's safe and effective. You know?
And
behind the scenes, you don't really get any
more information. It's sort of like the blank
insert of the COVID vaccines, but just on
a
a constant all around scale. But you'll see
what I mean in general. But so the
point is that this is the shot, and
it says, buy vaxxers for influenza a virus,
h n h seven n nine subtype infections,
likelihood of approval.
V h v x s one two one
nine is under development for the prevention of
h seven n nine virus infections.
Okay. And, again, the microarray
patch technology. That's just the points I want
you to see from this. That's what we're
talking about. So January 13.
This is from business wire, Vaxos, named stage
winner of United States BARDA prize.
So it's interesting that United States will be
funding,
you
know, especially now, other Australian
company
vaccin vaccinology directions. Like, that seems like an
odd step, I think.
And specifically to advance the microarray
patches for vaccination.
Now the picture I have on the main
thing today, I'll I'll show it to you
in a second again. You know, it's the
one we've shown you a long time ago.
It's that weird kind of mini spike needle
patch that then and then overlaps, which we'll
show you with this is pretty much everywhere
you look, with ways that they can then
determine whether or not you were injected.
The United States Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority, BARDA, has announced Vaxxis will receive,
$2,000,000,000
from The US, and it's one example, for,
the it's multistage $50,000,000
competition designed to quote or quote the article,
encourage the advancement of microwave patches for the
delivery of RNA based vaccines
for seasonal pandemic influenza and COVID nineteen.
So it's the RNA, mRNA part of this
that I think makes this especially problematic.
So all the same problems, but with a
way that is, you know, almost can be
done in ways that people don't even realize
it's happening. And that's what really worries me.
But overall,
mRNA, COVID. Didn't we I mean, is this
the play? Self amplifying in patches. So totally
not the same thing. Did they think we're
that stupid? I mean, that that seems to
be what they're doing.
Now it says the section by BARDA recognizes
VAX is significant. Oh, one part was that
I think part of it is funding this
because, like they said, they wanna encourage this
direction
anywhere in the world. That seems like an
odd thing. Is it you know, it's it's
always been a global dynamic.
The selection of BARDA recognizes
Vaxus Vaxus'
significant advancements toward commercializing its proprietary high density
microarray.
So, again, they seem to be the one
that at least have in this case, have
the,
you know, they own this this patent or
whatever it would be in this case
for the microarray patch HD map for vaccine
delivery, including completion of five successful phase one
clinical trials. And remember, that's what they in
the kind of Prospera Freedom City, teal funded
sort of, like, bioengineered research element we talked
about yesterday, where they're doing all sorts of,
like, unregulated weird bio experiments and they're in
Prosper and elsewhere, not a secret now,
is
the
phase one would be where it ends. That's
what they were just talking about. Jim O'Neil
was all about that. Like, let them decide.
Right. So let the vaccine companies lie to
you and put it out before they actually
tested properly and then let you decide. Isn't
that what happened during COVID? You know, it's
like it's just a weird thing to be
doing off the heels of what they told
you they were fighting.
And
involving more than 500 people. Whoo. Big one.
Right? Now that's the point. It's so it's
small, so you never really understand. Like, it's
it's what we went through last time, the
six mice. It's like how dumb this is.
K. Down here, it says, Vaxxis is currently
conducting
an IND enabled phase one clinical study with
BARDA for pre pandemic influenza vaccines. Now this
keeps coming up.
They keep framing this as sort of like
a per like a pre like, not in
the face of a problem, but things designed
to sort of stave off the problem, which
is what you would argue they they think
most vaccines are. But this feels categorized differently.
I'll make that point again in a second.
And it says involving 258
participants. So there's multiple ones of these going
on. This one, the company has shown promising
results in their initial
HD map mRNA
work
funded by CEPI.
Right? So all these these points we made
in the past. Right? Where it's like the
shell game, you know, where Trump pulls funding
away from WHO because it's to Gavi, which
Gavi gives WHO, and that was the first
administration. Right? Similar things have gone on, which
you've already talked about. One being that they're
acting like we're totally not involved with CEPI,
for example, except for the fact that there's
many ways that you can see that the
same thing happens. So here they are funding
something that's and, actually, I just showed you
the AI
this one.
One of the many, by the way. Here's
CAPI right here. AI enhanced self amplified mRNA
vaccine to combat one of the most the
deadliest known viruses.
And and for all we know, this is
oh, no. This is the Geneva Biopharmaceuticals Limited,
but my point is it's all the same
set it's CEPI. So if we know that
these are being funded through
you know, in this case, to make it
clear, the US government is funding this through
an Australian company.
So when you the Trump administration is not
supporting that. It it they are exact it's
just it's not in the way that you
would normally see. But, I mean, that's not
even the point. I mean, it matters, but
it's the it's the outcome as I'm always
talking about. What are they doing? They're funding
mRNA injections
in many different ways. That's the takeaway that
should matter.
So next here, this one is from February
22.
Vaxys and CEPI
advance
$4,800,000
program for needle free thermostable
mRNA vaccines. Now this is these are all
different dynamics, like, the or rather,
projects.
So this one is showing excellent thermostability and
effective delivery of mRNA vat using Vaxys' proprietary
high density microarray patch. This is really drilling
the point home. Multiple ways they're trying to
make mRNA delivering
vaccine patches. By the way, when you look
into these things with not really making it
clear that it's mRNA.
With success in several completed human clinical trials,
which, by the way, even that. You know,
the idea that they're still releasing more of
this stuff into the environment, into the, you
know, into the, you know, into people, but
shedding and all the conversations we've had.
More than 500 participants. Additional ongoing phase one
trials
for other seasonal flu,
COVID nineteen,
other vaccines targeting pandemic influenza
funded by United States Biomedical Advanced Research, BARDA.
DMAP,
DH DMAP platform.
This one is February 18.
Vaxess completes enrolled enrollment for largest clinical trial
of this patch. So this is just to
show you that it is continuing, that they
are going through these, and it is it
is completed. You know, these things are I
mean, this point, there are places I think
they're already out there. Like patches is what
I mean. This has been a they've talked
about this. I'll show you next. Since 02/2019,
even before that.
The clinical study aims to evaluate the vaccine
for h seven and nine
for countermeasure for future pandemics.
Teams clinical collaborators phase one study
conducted under the investigational
new drug
application authorized
by the FDA.
Okay.
So why is the FDA authorizing
an Australian company patch?
I think you can piece that together.
Vaxxis has completed enrollment in phase one bird
trial, which we just pointed to. This is
twentieth. Patch delivered vaccine trial received $28,500,000
in funding from US authorities as potential pandemic
preparation.
Yeah. We've heard all these buzzwords, guys. It's
the same thing we were worried about under
the left side of it.
Pandemic preparedness.
Right?
Here is February 28. Skin packs delivery of
specifically SARS CoV two spike DNA vaccine.
Same as always, multiple version. I mean, this
is the same the point in this is
just more COVID nineteen injections.
We I mean and this is even going
back. This is like the direction of the
AstraZeneca,
of the what's the other one? Johnson and
Johnson,
which hurt a lot of people too. I
just remember we were being told by RFK
and Trump and everybody else that these threw
out Trump, but the rest of them and
Trump kinda plays into it that these things
were gonna change.
They're just going in a different direction with
the same problem.
March 5, newly published data supports effective delivery
of DNA based vaccines using Maxis' high density
microarray pack,
the HD map.
Recently published data generated by the University of
Queensland and Vaxxis shows effective delivery of the
nucleic acid based COVID nineteen vaccine. That's just
the point. It shows the DNA side of
it, same platform, same direction.
DNA vaccine owned by
a private this is what I was talking
about earlier. This is one of the other
ones. A private biotechnology company called Technovolia.
Look it up. Tell me if you can
find any information. It seems to be this
you know, many of these examples of in
this very direction, I keep going up to
a dead end owned by a private entity.
And you're like, what does that mean? How
so, like, when did this this is where
you get into the public private overlap, guys,
and this is what we've always been talking
about.
It says the new data builds on promising
results from recent preclinical work by Vaxxis showing
the effectiveness of this platform.
And it mentioned CEPI as well and delivery
of mRNA based vaccines under a program funded
by CEPI.
Now look. This goes back to Derek's article
from twenty twenty, October twenty second. The head
of Operation Warp Speed
and the Gates Foundation are pushing bioelectric and
vaccine patches.
Right? If you if you follow this platform,
guys, his history shows that you'll be ahead
of the story.
And it should we've been taught these are
the same things that were there
this whole time. And the interesting overlap is
that these do dovetail
wearables
and patches in obvious fashion.
So before we get to that, this is
one of the things that this is on
the surface of this conversation.
Quantum dots encode vaccine history in the skin.
Invisible to the eye, the dots glow under
infrared light from modified smartphones. That's the image
I used for the show today. That's like
a scientific image from, I believe it was
Science Direct. I think it was a science
platform. I forget the which the which one
it was. But the point is that you
can use
different technology
to be able to see
the bioluminescence,
maybe luciferase, things like that that will show
up and see. Right? When there's a whole
interesting conversation around that that relates back to
biblical conversations and, you know, there's a lot
going on around this that I think is
very interesting.
Oh, here. It just it already went away.
Now it says, now a team of MIT's
bioengineers
have developed a new way to keep invisible
vaccine records under the skin. Delivered and this
is 2,019.
Delivered through a microneal patch,
biocompatible
quantum dots. And now there is an overlap
with that and the graphene conversation, but it's
not always that case. And it says they
embed in the skin and and fluorescence
under near infrared light, creating a glowing trace
that can be detected at least five years
after vaccination.
The work is described today in the journal
Science Translational Medicine. I think that's what it
was.
Now quantum dots are small, semiconducting
nanoparticles.
Of course, because we haven't been warning about
that for a long time, quantum dots are
being explored for medical use as biological
sensors and probes.
And as usual, these conversations
starts as just, you know, we'll be able
to look and see the light, and we'll
know for sure. And then leaving out the
other 90% of what they do inside your
body. Like, that's kinda where these things tend
to go. The bot the dots were then
loaded into a microneedle patch, a square
a square with an array
of tiny needles that deliver nanoparticles into the
skin. Sounds lovely.
In the current paper, the scientists applied the
patch to the skin of rats and were
able to detect the dots using smartphone
modified with a filter to detect near infrared
light.
Says they're also planning a study expected to
begin in early twenty twenty,
interesting timing, to survey populations in Kenya, Bangladesh,
Malawi
about the acceptability of the technology,
such as how and where it will be
most useful and if parents will be on
board.
I bet you they did a lot of
experiments like that in 2020. It says the
work is funded by the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation.
So
obviously now with Donald Trump's administration supporting this,
which is what it is, and Biden too
and all the rest before it, just recognize
that they're doing the same thing just like
I've been showing you the entire time. Nicholas,
Holscher,
the epidemiologist and administrator at the McCullough Foundation,
points this out. This is from,
June 27.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
has funded wearables, which you all know, skin
implants,
microneedle patches that deliver permanent quantum dots to
verify vaccination. Now can be permanent. The point
is the authors of the Gates funded study
note that the quantum dot marking should persist
for at least five years. Quantum dots, the
s one zero c five h QDs encapsulated
in polymethyl
methylacrylate
microspheres,
excuse me, can be detected with adapted smartphones
as we pointed out. Quantum dot implants
would be used as biological vaccine passports,
where their detection in human skin would be
required
to enter grocery stores, restaurants, gyms, and this
is not a secret. Like, that is the
overlapping point that has been made. Like, he
actually cites a study in conversation at this
very point. Like, this is what they're talking
about. That's the old image we showed you
a long time ago.
So I agree. And he goes over a
few other images that you that, I didn't
share, that you'll find in here. This is
what they float as the future.
And realize,
very importantly, that the smart city, Prospera, Freedom
Cities overlap, which is all the same conversation,
are very public and clear about what they
want. Look at the Gaza one. Digital IDs,
you know, mass AI surveillance, AI smart cities,
digital money, all of it. And that is
how this works, is different kinds of dynamics
like this that allow them to be able
to track you without needing to act. You
know, it's it's all
it's next level stuff, and you see how
it comes together. They need the AI to,
you know, they need the digital ID to
make sure you're accessible to it. They need
the the digital money to be able to
surveil and control what you can use it
on. Like, it all comes together.
And here's RFK on June 24 again saying
my vision is that every American is wearing
a wearable within four years.
Just gotta start being honest about the direction
this is going in, guys.
Now, again, here's Bill Gates.
This is an older clip of him saying
the patches are coming your way.
We'll have new vaccines. We'll have a,
t Oh, and don't forget, Donald Trump met
with him twice now, and Gates has been
very excited about what they had a conversation
about. And since then, they've continued to go
in the direction of mRNA self amplifying and
other kinds of shots. So you could piece
that together. TB vaccine,
malaria vaccine, HIV vaccine, and even the things
like COVID vaccines,
we need to make them have longer duration,
more coverage,
and we're gonna change instead of using needle
to use a little patch.
So the pandemic really highlighted that we've been
under invested
in those innovations and, you know, our partners
in India are are part of how we're
gonna,
get these breakthrough products done. Okay. So, again,
is when you talk about how Gates said,
you know, by this time, vaccines will be
rolling out. Okay. Yeah. And then rightly, you
should ask whether or not he knew something,
whether or not he was telling you. It
wasn't just a guess. It was okay. So
same point.
Did he know this? So you can either
decide that he just guessed and then, you
know, in other context, those kind of people
would have never gone. They'd always make it
you know, the point is, assume in this
conversation what you wanna hear of it, but
deny it here. And what's the difference? That
Trump's involved. That's it.
Either he knew this was coming or he
is the one that drove Trump to do
it are the most logical at there's probably
plenty more possibilities.
But it has to matter. And you know
as well as I that people are choosing
to ignore most of these things.
Now let's overlap this conversation with Israel
for just not not because you necessarily have
to, but because this is what we're gonna
get into next. But I think it's interesting
to talk about this in regard to Microsoft,
just, you know, in regard to Bill Gates.
I just think it's interesting that Microsoft keeps
kind of playing, you know, showing his face
in this conversation. And this is interesting as
Hegseth
just announced they're going to internally audit the
Bill Gates founded company Microsoft.
How interesting. They suddenly see Israel. Right? Oh,
wait. Never mind. They're doing it to find
out if Chinese nationals are using it,
which, yeah, matters, of course. But funny how
Microsoft, as we keep showing you, is,
like, on the record, completely immersed with Israel
and their intelligence apparatus. Here's WikiLeaks. The Israeli
army is using Amazon's cloud service to store
surveillance
information
on Gaza's population while procuring further AI tools
from Google and Microsoft for military purposes. That's
actually the wrong one. But that were that
that is part that's one of them. But
it was the
that wasn't it either.
Azure.
There it is.
Leaks reveal Microsoft helped Israel deploy Azure cloud
for mass surveillance and airstrike planning, which then
obviously then does connect with this one about
them using this. It's, you know, it's it's
it's very clear.
WikiLeaks and others have called this out. Leak
leaked documents reveal Microsoft's Azure cloud was used
by Israel's unit eight two hundred for mass
surveillance of Palestinians. Now it's not just they're
using their prep their their programs. You can
see that they're hiring people directly from intelligence
in Israel. You can see that people are
for unit eighty two hundred that it's very
public.
So I just think it's worth remembering, especially
as it is something that's connected with a
lot of other conversations.
This was just the DARPA selects Microsoft to
continue the development of their utility
scale quantum computer.
2024. Hooray.
More aggressive overlap with Israel's intelligence apparatus with
all of our weird super super next generation
tech. Makes you feel good.
Include these for you.
So
here he is going, we're gonna investigate Microsoft
to make sure that Chinese nationals aren't using
it to hack into DOD systems, which by
the way, the reason people are hacking into
these systems is because they allow Israeli intelligence
to have backdoors and see, you know, it's
in one part. I mean, clearly, there are
other aspects that I can talk about which
show you that they're just being fast and
loose with even caring about this kind of
security, whether Israel or otherwise. But, I mean,
we talked about the telemessage discussion, how embarrassing
this is that they're using an Israeli intelligence.
What's the word I'm looking for?
Not categorizes, but, you know, it it basically
so it's it's you use signal, and you
it's called let me I've I've I'll grab
that again really quickly. Because that is an
important one for you guys to actually check
out.
State department
revealed to be using Israeli intelligence link chat
app involved in Trump admin hack.
Right? So they were using TeleMessage in the
inner circle of the White House,
which it it, god. I can't remember the
word.
Archives.
It archives
all everything you're using on the app and
then relays that back to the telemess that
it's all the record. I did a whole
thing on this show. TeleMessage is on the
surface an Israeli intelligence entity, and they're using
this in the White House. And it wasn't
just him, guys. It's just wild to me
how obvious it is that there's a major
problem that people are finally starting to call
out here.
But so keep that in mind, you know,
the DOD, and he's gonna look into it
for Chinese stuff. Here's what Salari report says.
And where is the missing 20,000,000,000,000 that they're
never gonna actually talk about? I was told
it started at the same time Microsoft loaded
up the special 95 Windows for the government.
Oh,
okay. See? It may go back a lot
further than you think.
Include this for
you. Oh, I
did.
So on top of that, here is
Chris Menahan talking about Wikipedia. And this is
these are just individual points. I mean, a
lot we've shown we've gone over so many
of the examples. What this shows you is
APAC, a pair of APAC funded Republicans working
on behalf of the ADL, sent an intimidating
letter to the Wikipedia Foundation. We showed it
to you the the other day. It was
from the government of the United States threatening
them
to manipulate information for Israel.
What's interesting is just before that, the ADL
had gone on a rant a a tirade
telling them that they need to censor Wikipedia.
I just think it's insane that they just
jumped up and said, okay. The people like
Randy Fine, Leo,
what's his names, or to Leo, whatever the
the black guy, I forget his name now.
They're all, like, aggressively
doing Israel points to something, and they jump
up and go after it.
So I just think it's it's insulting to
not see how obvious that is. It says
these requests, which Wikipedia have only two weeks
to comply with, line up perfectly with the
ALDL ADL's agenda and amount to nothing more
than an intimidation tactic or pressure Wikipedia to
change their editorial guidelines, which by the way
is already wildly manipulated by groups like them.
It's just it just shows you how they're
losing control, and they're they're even losing control
of the people that they've usually been able
to manipulate.
But the overarching point for this is that
is Israel is infiltrating the US government in
obvious ways. So here's DG Geopolitics showing you
that after that all happened, Wikipedia's Gaza war
entry has now suddenly listed the Islamic State
Palestine district as a Hamas ally.
Guys, it's just so stupidly,
it's a lie as they rightly point out.
They are
ideologically
different. I mean, they are enemies.
You can easily prove this. Robert's broken this
down. So it's just insulting. But what they're
trying to do is just make it lazily
about
terrorism.
It's ISIS. You know? Or or it's aside
from the obvious reality that ISIS and Al
Qaeda are very clearly proxy elements of The
US and Israel like we're watching in Syria,
by the way. But go ahead and pretend
that this group that they you know? I
don't even need to give it with a
service, guys. It's just so lazy.
But it shows you how easy it is
if Israel just asks
The US demands.
Another example, you might have seen this. You
pointed to it. This video is probably down
here somewhere. I was looking at it earlier.
This is a video of a girl, a
woman at in in college,
who a guy with an IDF shirt
said something to her. And, you know, if
there's any exam any, you know, what we've
seen of so far, they're very provocative. They're,
like, intentionally trying to mute. But either way,
it doesn't matter for the point, is that
she reacted
and started yelling at him and, you know,
like, smacked his phone away. Like, very, very
minimal.
And Bondi and everybody else went to town
to get her removed.
Randy Fine just shared it going, yeah. You're
expelled. Get out of here. We don't want
terrorists in our country. Terrorists?
I mean, it's wild.
Her name is Eden Deckerhoff.
She's been expelled from Florida State University, and
she's also being sued.
You see how crazy this is? And this
is the only this is not they they
know that they've lost control of what most
people think about it. But what they recognize
is they still have the control over people
in power, so they're exerting that.
Blakely says, is this a joke?
She's expelled, sued, and the literal DOJ under
Pam Bondi made a federal case out of
the woman flipping off a man wearing a
terrorist
IDF shirt, but an Israeli pedophile who works
in the government of Israel was caught in
a sting operation and able to leave The
United States without consequence?
You got that right, Kash Patel?
Guys, I mean, this is this should be
outrageous
in particular to people on their side.
But, nope. You won't hear either side call
it out, and you know why.
That's that's so depressing
that this, this so you have an American
student
who acted like, look. If you wanna you
wanna charge her for some kind of a
what would you like, I mean, it wouldn't
even be assault. Like, you watch the video
for yourself. It's it's like the flag brushing
that person's eye. Fine. Charge them for harassment
or whatever. In no way would that go
to expelling. In no way would that even
be a legal issue. But they're taking that
all the way to the point to where
she's being spelled, sued, and how much you
wanna bet they try to make this an
example of some kind of deportation or some
kind of, you know, something like that. If
there was gonna be one, it would be
something like this.
It's just insulting and you know it. It's
not what we this is somebody fighting for
somebody other something other than American interests.
Now we already know that Palantir is very
much overlapped with Israel. That's very obvious. This
is just my my clumsy way to fold
this into the next part. It's very important
to see that Palantir is a strategic partner
of somebody committing genocide in multiple places right
now. So keeping that in mind, Jason Basterds
points out the CIA bankrolled Palantir
as a private front to bypass the constitution
and circumvent privacy protections.
Palantir didn't just build a tool. It built
a legal loophole. It's a very good way
to think about that. Now there's a lot
of other ways. It's a big situation. It
doesn't you know, there's you might even say
in some ways it's oversimplified, but he's doing
it for a reason. Right? He's doing this
to make a very clear focal point that
they in one major way, if not the
entire point, they created
a situation which allowed them to do the
thing which we've always all agreed was wrong,
but they did it because narrative. Right? And
because situation. You know, it's what they're doing,
and he's right.
So thinking about what we just went over
with the Israel infiltration or just anybody,
they are acting in ways that violate the
most foundational aspects of what we believe this
country is.
That's and this is being built around you
in rapid speed right now.
So we talked about The US' new Israeli
made AI precrime system. I actually can't believe
how little attention that got from ex in
particular,
freedom focused Republicans.
This is an Israeli entity. Gideon, we talked
about it. Watch this show. It's horrifying. This
guy rushed out the moment that shooting happened
off the pack of Melania's post and said,
we talked to 12 different agencies. We've got
thousand people in place. So, yeah, so, obviously,
it was already going on. There's no way
around that.
And it's the same old precrime element that
Whitney's been warning about forever, that Bill Barr
began in Trump's last administration, and they just
continue to this point. Now it's AI precrime.
Like, it's the same real point, but it's
just to another
next level.
And he tells you it's made in Israel.
Very tells you and he even tells you
that it aligns with Israel's kind of like
what was the word we talked about today?
I mean, I ain't wake up. I'm forgetting
off the top of my head. Onto college
or, onto onto
I can't remember now. Anyway, the point was
that it's about, you know, like
like like, almost like esoteric. Like, saying it
it's, like, in line with, like, Israel's worldview.
As an AI precrime tool, very alarming. But
the overarching point here, guys, is that this
is
counter to your to what we believe this
country is. All built on the idea that
we have to fight this because one crazy
person shots at people, you know, ignoring for
a moment how often those things are cultivated,
how often they lie about it, how how
often they use whatever's in front of them.
It just blows my mind. As always, there's
not an excuse where suddenly the answer is
violate inalienable rights.
Doesn't happen. I don't care what you think.
I don't care how serious it gets. There's
not an answer which is do the wrong
thing.
But that's what they've driven a lot of
people to, to convince themselves that the thing
that you are dying for will will break
right now, but because we have a reason
for it. Really?
I don't believe everyone's falling for it though
because that is a hard sell.
But keeping that in mind and the overlapping
with what's going on in the country,
Trump rolls out Obama's martial law plan. Now
I made a joke about that, but it's
not really a joke because the point is
that somebody was making a whole effort to
argue that the the statements of what Obama
were gonna do were all conspiracy theory, but
Trump's actually doing them now. I simply made
the point that you could prove that Obama's
actions were not conspiracy theory. They just didn't
really execute it to its full extent. And
Trump is now the one doing it. So
acknowledge, like every other example, that they are
the same thing and he's rolling it out
in a different way. And, of course, we
talked about the Larry Fink in inner circle.
He's literally in the inner circle of Donald
Trump, and he was the last time too,
and somehow that's not a problem. And in
every moment they can, the Republicans are calling
out BlackRock when it bumps up against Democrat.
But, weirdly, doesn't care about this.
Silly.
Now just a thought says,
if everyone would stop focusing on distractions,
like Trump dying and starting and started focusing
on the May militarization
of our country paired with Israeli backed surveillance
and technocratic influence within the administration,
maybe we'd have a chance.
I agree. And here's Donald Trump saying we're
gonna roll out more martial law, but this
time in Chicago.
Chicago,
though?
Well, we're going in. I didn't say when.
We're going in. When you lose look. I
have an obligation. This isn't a political thing.
I have an obligation. When we lose when
20 people are killed over the last two
and a half weeks Yeah. Yeah. There and
especially over the last few days, I guess,
there was a spike, which happens in Chicago
all the time. I'm not saying that's okay.
It it just it's something that's been there
and and been a problem. But what you're
gonna hear is him trying to create this
as yet again, like like he just did
with DC, that it is now the most
dangerous place in the world.
Provably false, by the way. But, oh, even
oh, but you always just speaking off the
cuff. No. It's called a lie. Okay? Because
he says it repeatedly and he keeps saying
it and forces it in. It's not the
most dangerous place in the world. And in
fact, it's not even the most dangerous city
in the country. But, yes, it's very dangerous.
And, yes, I I will equally with you
criticize the politicians that have allowed it to
happen, whether they're left or right. Because there
are other places in the country that are
right leaning that are somewhat as bad. But
I'll happily admit that Chicago in particular is
one of the worst. But, again, per capita,
not the most dangerous place in this country.
Just because you don't like that, because it
challenges what he's trying to sell you on,
doesn't make it not true. So it frustrates
me that how easy it is to play
people that want to believe in a person.
And seventy five are shot with bullets.
As opposed to knives, you know, being shot
with knives. So let me tell you a
little story about a place called DC,
District Of Columbia, right here where we are.
It's now a safe zone.
We have no crime. We have Incorrect.
And we'll prove it to you next.
It's in such great shape. You can go
and actually
walk with your children, your wife, your husband.
Which they could do before. Right? I mean,
yeah. Certain parts dangerous at night. Yeah. But
if you if you care to actually be
an honest person about this, plenty of people
who live in Washington, DC would tell you
that there's plenty people go out during the
day and go to parks. Yeah. Yeah. That's
real, guys.
Yes. And there are bad areas. There are
good areas. It's like anywhere else. But they
will play you by using what you want
to see and hear and using caricature. You
know?
It's like gerrymandering of political news. Right? They'll
just kinda carve out a certain thing and
be like, that's the thing right there. Meanwhile,
you're missing the other 90 of the conversation.
And if you saw that, it changes the
entire view. But it's left and right. It's
what politics is. It's what they do. Could
walk right down the middle of the street.
You're not gonna be shot, Peter. You're safe.
He's such a
this killed me.
Rob, you were there. But the point
is that they're going after Chicago. At least
that's what they're projecting now. Of course, Bennet
Johnson, you know, cheering on the Marshall state
well, you know, the the unconstitutional
reality of the country, woo hoo, says it's
time to deploy the National Guard.
Trump says Chicago is the murder capital of
the world.
Nope.
That's just not true. Right? Whether dangerous, which
you said before, or most dangerous, it's not
true. Now look, guys. It's a crazy thing
to say. There are a lot more dangerous
places in the world. There's a lot there's
more dangerous per capita places in this country.
I'll show you right now with Grok, with
other with Newsweek,
not that you should blindly trust those two,
but do your own research. But I think
it's always interesting to show the platform that
they all think is on their side challenging
what they have to say. But overall,
it's
if you can acknowledge that it's not the
mo the murder capital of the world, then
you have to acknowledge that that's playing it
fast and loose with the truth, if not
just simply lying to you.
And then ask yourself why that has to
be the case. Couldn't he just tell you
that it's a dangerous place? We wanna help.
Why do you always have to push the
envelope? Because it's I mean, you can answer
that question. It's kind of easy to recognize.
So here's what
Grock had to say. No. Chicago is not
the murder capital of the world. While it
has a high number of homicides due to
its large population,
its murder rate per capita is lower than
many other cities globally and within The United
States. Now, yes, per capita matters.
Right? Because if you have a if you
have a massive population,
you're gonna have pretty much more of everything.
Right? And so the idea is that that
it it could also be used to manipulate,
guys. That's also true. That's why you have
to show discernment and not blindly take one
side or the other, but look for yourself
like we're doing. And recognize that it's general
based on the numbers. It is not the
murder capital of the world, even The United
States. It says, for example, in 2024, Chicago
had 573
murders with a murder rate of about 21.5
per per 100,000 people, which is how they
tend to break these things down. Globally,
cities like Tijuana,
Mexico,
a 138 homicides per 100,000.
Okay. So first and foremost, clearly not the
murder capital of the world in any stretch
of the imagination.
Well, Ryan, he was just trying to accentuate
the point. No. It's called a lie, but,
okay, we'll put that aside. And he says,
in The United States, here it says Grock
says, cities like Saint Louis,
51
54.1
murders per 100,000
in 2024.
New Orleans, 74.3
murders per 100,000
in 2022.
Consistently have higher per capita murders than Chicago.
Okay. So, yes, so then they're just play
it's the same way they use the COVID
numbers in a certain slant to make you
think it was a certain way. That's what
politicians
do, guys.
It's and it says claims like murder capital
of the world from Trump
exaggerate the issue as Chicago's rate is lower
than many US international cities.
Pretty simple.
Here is oh, before we go past that,
this on DC as well.
The the reality of this is pretty clear
to me.
I mean, I'm not saying that we shouldn't
care about the crime. If it's the same
as you, you know, it's the same as,
like, when we're criticizing Neuralink
and saying there's a whole big agenda around
that. And you go, what? You don't want
people to walk again? Like, let's start playing
this tired game. Okay? Obviously, we're not talking
about that. That is the even if that
does happen, it doesn't change the concerns we
have for what else is going on. So
when the idea of Chicago, Washington, DC,
clearly
I'll speak for myself. In no way are
we saying we shouldn't care about the crime.
That's just a lazy response because that's obviously
not the case. It's that we care about
what they're using the situation for,
using the situation to execute.
As we always used to ask, right, Republicans?
We always used to say that, or everybody
should have been going, like, question everything. Right?
Maybe their private reaction solution, but not one
is Trump's side. So now they're arguing they're
gonna roll out to another place. Now beyond
DC, which I've been waiting for the next,
like, deployment,
it creates a very a much more difficult
effort
because DC and the the different statehood situation
is I think that's why they started there,
hoping this precedent would carry over, but there's
an entirely different legal challenge that begins when
they go you know, even regard to the
National Guard and crossing state lines and where
they're who's in charge. I mean, it is
important to see that I mean, they're they're
violating Pasi Comatanas right now. It's there is
no act of congress. There's no national emergency
despite the statement of such. It's just not
the reality. There is not some crime national
emergency because that doesn't back it up. It
goes to court. The numbers are not worse.
If it was a national emergency for crime,
then you would have started in the worst
place. It's not what happened.
Not not neither is DC, and I'll show
you the breakdown again in a second. So
this is, in my opinion, using a problem
like we keep talking about that we actually
want solved,
the government, not the left and right lie,
but the government creating a problem and using
their that need for that problem to be
solved, to roll in something new, to do
any number of things, to normalize this with
martial law on the streets, to drive us
into a position where we accept the biometric
digital scans and surveillance to justify whatever the
new problem is tomorrow.
It's it's just or
some, you know, breakdown of this country, to
put it simply. And there's a whole way
to go into, and you know I've talked
about it a lot. But I see this
destabilization happening right now, and it's pitting Americans
against Americans. It's hard to see that. But
that's that's coming from my personal perspective on
it.
But overlapping this with DC, it's the same
point as Trump tells you. Remember, didn't Trump
just tell you that DC was the worst
place in the world?
Well, now he's now in Chicago. But, of
course, because Trump saved DC, and that's why
it's nice now. Right? Well, that's also not
true.
Trump says, d, and it's not because this
article says so. You can look into the
the data for yourself. The reality is that
there was in the last week, there was
a murder. But, yeah, that's down for sure.
But, of course, having military march to the
streets kinda makes it obvious to see why
the murderers and thieves aren't going around. Oh,
except guess what? There was a whole bunch
of robberies and a whole bunch of reports
of problems that they're not telling you about.
So even if you wanna say it's safer,
which it probably is by default because military
is marching through the streets, which nobody in
DC probably wants,
the obvious point is that if there's still
still a bunch of robberies and chaos, then
why are why would they say there's nothing?
It's again, it's the same as saying the
most dangerous place in the world, which is
a lie. It's not just a casual exaggeration.
To say that there's no crime is a
lie. Those things matter. It means they're just
trying to deceive you. Trump says DC is
now crime free. That was his quote. It
has it had 400 per reported incidents in
the last week.
In a spree of truth social posts on
Labor Day, president Trump declared Washington DC a
crime free zone following his National Guard takeover
of the capital. Now you know as well
as I, regardless what would have happened, that
was his or that was what they were
going to claim because that's what politicians do.
They're not gonna go out and go, whoops,
we failed. My mistake. That never happens. Right?
Point out an example of when that's ever
happened. When they come out and go, I
made a mistake. I was incorrect.
It is a it's a unicorn in politics.
These include 50 reports oh, excuse me. It
says, however, available crime statistics from DC Metropolitan
Police Department, which is what they're immersed with
right now. Right? They're in there.
Shows 442
crime reported crimes reported in the district over
the past seven days. It's not a huge
thing. My point is to show you that
it is even with a military presence, there's
still crime, and it's not crime free. These
include 50 reports of violent crime, one homicide,
and I'll point out why that's important. It's
it's a
we'll get to it.
23 instances of assault with a dangerous weapon,
24 robberies, and two cases of sex abuse.
Nearly 250
thefts were also reported over the past week.
Trump began his so called crime crackdown in
DC on August 11. As part of the
effort, his administration took over the city's police
department and sent National Guard troops, FBI, ICE,
and agents into the streets.
So they took over the police department. So
when you're taking the police department's information
so if you're gonna claim they're lying about
the data, well, then you're pointing to the
Trump administration lying about the okay. You get
it.
Although hundreds of crimes are still being reported,
as recently as January, the Department of Justice
was touting the fact that the violent crime
in Washington,
quote, is the lowest it has been in
over thirty years
in January
2025.
That's the Trump administration. Trump, however, has said
he plans to follow suit with the federal
takeover of law enforcement in other major cities,
including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore, and
Oakland. Okay. Well, let's look at those places.
Trump was seen departing the White House to
play golf on Saturday,
Saturday morning and on Sunday night and posted,
never felt better in my life.
I think it's funny because I don't I'm
not oh, I think he's dying, and I
I didn't even look into it. I mean,
certain you question these things. You should always
be feeling you should always
feel it's okay to question anything.
My point is
that going from he's dead to never felt
better in his life, it's probably somewhere in
the middle. Just to make the point, they
lie about everything because that's what they do.
But the places they're talking about, right?
So here are the the top 30 based
on, you know, crime rates entirely and per
capita. It's the only real way to do
it objectively.
Listed right there. Chicago is number 16. Baltimore
is number twenty sixth. DC doesn't make the
list. But so funny, I mean, Memphis,
Tennessee was mentioned, but that doesn't seem that's
number one.
Cleveland, Ohio, Toledo, these are all these are
one, two, and three. Why aren't we starting
there? Now many some of these, I think
Arkansas, I forget which ones. I think four
three or four of them were Republican locations.
And then this and and I think a
good portion of them were Republican states, which
doesn't change the fact that it's a Democrat
city.
But it matters though because we this is
just not the they're they're deceiving you about
what's really going on.
So he's gonna roll it out to places
that are not the most dangerous by claim
while stating that it's the most dangerous place
in the world because that's what he needs
to sell you on. Seems pretty simple.
Now this is from Grock. How many murders
in DC over the last week? I was
curious if they you know, with the comparison
to what Newsweek said. Based on available data,
DC re recorded one homicide in the last
week from August 26 to September 1. So
even while the military is marching through the
streets, somebody got murdered. Now what I said,
what was the average murder per week before
Trump's actions?
Turns out that that was three per week.
Point point one nine. Okay. So, I mean,
let's be real about this. You have now
if you're gonna make a a statistical, that's
what, 66%, which does seem like that's a
large number. But we're talking about going from
three murders a week to one. Now looking
at it in an objective sense,
I don't think that's as big as a
change as you may wanna think. And I,
again, think that it is only a change,
and I think that's evidenced by the fact
that there was still a murder and there
was some still there's still crime we'll go
into next,
that all they're really seeing is this kind
of weird limbo where people are watching military
march on the streets, and so people are
doing less things. That's not gonna that's not
changing people's actions. Those criminals will go back
to what they're doing the moment the military's
gone, which, as I said, I can almost
guarantee will be the justification for leaving a
presence, even if it's just like a hangover
national guard presence, which becomes permanent,
which is kinda what seems to be happening.
I don't know why Republicans think this makes
sense. But I said, how many robberies have
taken place over the last week? According to
available data,
seven it says, specifically, seven robberies reported within
the period of the last 12,
of a period of less than twelve hours
from mid afternoon, Friday twenty ninth. And additional
reports indicate that at least two more robberies
occurred,
with during this week. And it says that
another on August 30, this brings a total
to nine robberies for the week. You know,
it's it's kinda what pretty close to what
news Newsweek was saying. So to me, I
think it just speaks to the idea that
there is still crime taking place, and I
just made the point. I think it's a
it's a it's a pause,
and the moment this shifts, it's gonna go
back. It's not really about the crime, guys.
If they cared about the crime, the entire
thing will be done differently. And, ultimately, it
wouldn't be focused on one side of the
paradigm, and they would have done this a
long time ago.
This is the executing the agenda.
Now here is Piro
making I mean, this is the kind of
stuff that makes me
embarrassed
for the for the people that would fall
for such a ridiculously flimsy argument.
This is her normalizing the idea of military
in the streets because somehow, you know, it's
always just stupid Democrats. Next thing you know,
they're gonna say police shouldn't be there. Well,
yeah, you know, somebody like you who claims
to be educated about the law should very
much know that those are shockingly different things,
but she's just trying to convince you that
this is okay because she has a political
side. Here's what she says.
This is effective,
and the people of DC know it. And
this nonsense about National Guard on the street.
Next thing they're gonna say, police shouldn't be
on the street. No surprise because the three
dumbest words ever said by Democrats were defund
the police.
Right. Which is, you know, they're this is
the only thing they can do left or
right. They go the other side dumb.
The other side racist.
Right? And and and somehow that works for
the dumbest people in the room. Alright. So
in this case,
Democrats are bad. They tried to defund the
police. Therefore, it's okay that you have martial
law, which is not what she's saying. But
military in the streets is not even close
to the same thing as police in the
streets, and she knows that. So she's being
very dishonest about this. And, also, because it's
effective,
is it constitutional? Who cares? It's working. Right?
These are authoritarians
pretending, masquerading as patriots and constitutionalists,
which pretty much goes for most of the
mainstream alternate media, it seems right now. Aaron
Melnick says, our founding fathers made damn sure
to separate the military from the civilian.
We should remember why they did this and
not rush to toss their wisdom aside.
Very wise take on that in in the
face of such stupidity and dishonesty.
Homeland Security, just doing the same thing. This
is literally the DHS account.
Judd post this going troops hanging out in
DC Metro today displaying assault rifles
doing absolutely nothing.
Oh, yeah. So we're past the whole just
Dastard Guard with their hide arms. Oh, no.
We got full on military with with assault
rifles.
Now funny how rapidly they're not even talking
about it. This is martial law. There's no
way around it. Anybody honest, including conservatives, have
been calling this out. Can you imagine if
Obama was doing any of this?
DHS comes in and goes,
quote, why do we need firefighters? Nothing's on
fire.
Oh, oh, oh, quick. Great logic. I mean,
let's deploy the military in case something bad
goes wrong. Right?
It's it's the whole say something, say something.
Right? Safety check at your home. Let's be
let's make sure the police are knocking on
your doors every night to make sure you're
okay. Right? Do you want that?
I mean, it's just this is alarming. And
anybody that falls for the idea that it's
okay, they should be there just in case,
You've lost the plot, guys. You have lost
connection with what you think you're fighting for,
or you never were fighting for the constitution.
This is this continues.
Trump administration, as of today, approves 600
military lawyers
as immigration judges.
And as you might not be surprised,
the fake patriots are all cheering out there.
Now you may not understand why I say
that Because it doesn't seem as concerning, it
is though, as saying military
soldiers
on the streets.
But it's the same thing in principle. In
law, it's the same thing.
K? This this is talking about the idea
that they're taking military lawyers
and
through executive action, creating a situation where you
can place them as immigration lawyers because they
claim they need to rapidly push through the
process. Well, no. It was never an issue
of going faster. It was an issue of
doing it right,
And they never have been. They're trying to
skip due process. And so the problem is
regardless of whether this may execute the even
the right process,
this
is military
and civilian capacity.
And in particular, with law enforcement, this is
a crime. It's a violation of the Posse
Comitatus Act.
It's not a secret. And I I plan
on talking about this on the next fine
points because I'm sure Bruce loves some takes
on it. I think it's very obvious this
is a problem and you won't be surprised
to find the Nick Sorters, the Drew types
going, oh, let's go. Freedom. Even though it's
the exact opposite.
He goes up to 600 military lawyers have
been authorized,
right, whatever that word means to them. Trump
signed a piece of paper, as immigration judges
and effort to speed up mass deportations per
the Pentagon.
Well, yeah, it's also a crime, though. Right?
And we could go into this, and I
may go through it in more in more
depth. The simple reality is and I've had
I have the,
oh, here here's actually just Grotkin since they're
doing the same point with with
conservatives and, you know, what the platform is
saying. But you can go through the actual
act itself. Here's what it says even here.
The constitutionality
of authorizing military lawyers to serve as immigration
judges is highly questionable.
It likely violates the Posse Comitatus Act. Now
why does it say likely?
It says, unless explicitly authorized by Congress, it's
the same point, or an extraordinary statutory exception,
e g, Insurrection Act. So you see where
we are, and now you see why they
need to make these stories up, because Congress
sure as hell is not allowing this. So
they need to claim there's an insurrection. They
need to declare an emergency. And so explain
to me how you're gonna this is what
I said at the beginning of the DC
point. Okay. So they're floating it to go
to other cities. Are you now telling me
you're gonna declare an independent emergency on each
place every time you wanna tell us it's
the worst place in the world? Or are
you gonna declare a nationwide emergency because just
crime?
Either way, we should be outraged,
and it will become something like this. It'll
become some idea that it was a the
Democrats are doing it on purpose to overthrow
the government, and they'll go insurrection.
Or they won't care because the Congress does
not seem to do anything right now, especially
when they should be, you know, whether left
or right, when somebody should be impeached for
ignoring Supreme Court rulings or breaking the law.
That goes back to anyone you wanna look
at. They don't do it anymore. There's no
response. There's no action from Congress. And so
that means the executive branch is the dictator.
It's where we are. So but the point
is that it goes through a bunch here,
but just look up the plus come without
us act and realize that the idea
are very it's very clear.
And the only nuance right now with, like,
the National Guard is you can deploy National
Guard in the state, and it can be
run by the governor. But crossing state lines,
run by executive branch, all of which is
happening are violations of the act. All they
only claim there's getting around it by saying
there's an emergency.
So, the reality is any military, whether it's
lawyer, anybody in the military, being used in
this way, unless those two things, is a
crime.
So, did they did they declare next did
they,
use the Insurrection Act? Not that I can
see. Did congress make it okay? Not that
I can see. But you'll get the fake
patriots like Nick Sorey out there yelling to
the high, oh, we we're winning because
Democrats are bad.
This is an article, from, I think, was
it, Mother Jones? Experts question the legality of
deploying National Guard officers as immigration judges. This
is back from July. See? So they were
already trying to do this with National Guard.
It's the same difference, guys. It's military. Right?
The over and National Guard is either from
the Air Force or or from the Navy.
Or no. The Army or the Air Force.
And both are deployed so far.
I'm just it's just you need to recognize
that this is
any way they can get it done. It
says using military courts to hear civilian cases
is the essential component of martial law.
It is.
So if you're using that exact case,
I mean, come on. You already know where
this goes. I just it's it's sad we
can't be honest. Now,
all of this needs to be oh, I
think it's important to always think about the
big picture.
This is a show we did on in
August 2024. Weaponized migration and experimentation.
Tools for subversion, division, and manufacturing consent.
And one of the major parts is how,
like, transparently
obvious it is many cases because they admit
it publicly
that Israeli government entities are manufacturing weaponized migration.
It's really not that hard to see. And,
of course, when you recognize that they tell
you themselves that that's how they bring on
the end times, it's not hard to see
that these these religious Zionists that are all
through Trump's cabinet and all through Israel
are, like to argue that America first when
they think the country should collapse is kinda
hard to sell. But understanding that the whole
thing, the push, which we might go into
more in the next show, I put off
some of the stuff I was gonna get
into today, of them pushing this kind of
worldwide global, you know, remove the immigrants, it's
it's it is coming from one place.
And here's Insurrection Barbie,
quote, citing what Cenk Uygur said, which is
and, well, really, he quoted what Netanyahu said,
but which is very clearly what he did
say, which is you can't be MAGA if
you're anti Israel.
Netanyahu said that. So apparently now Netanyahu is
setting the tone for the MAGA movement.
Well, Insurrection Barbie came out and said he's
right.
Israel is only the democracy in The Middle
East and blah blah blah blah, well, for
which is why you can't be MAGA unless
you
are on Israel's side.
The this as I simply said, fake MAGA
exposing itself all over Twitter today. This is
on the thirtieth.
It's just it's very easy to see. Most,
I think, people in the MAGA side right
now are very clearly seeing that problem. And
people like them are drowning because nobody I
mean, it's very clear. I mean, look at
the engagement.
Excuse me. Even this. For what they're used
to. I mean, look.
You realize how many followers they have. Right?
A million followers, guys.
Look at that.
People see it.
Now talking about Israel,
this is a this is a disgusting conversation,
but I think it's important to see. Because
people like Insurrection Barbie and all the rest
of them that are blindly supporting Israel at
the expense of American interest
will run from this kind of conversation. And
we'll never discuss things like what we talked
about this guy.
Tom Alexandrovich.
We everyone's talked about it. I think it's
I mean, even the ones like Alex Jones
that tried to hide from it and Laura
Loomer were forced to engage with it because
nobody let it go. Good for you.
The US government
and in particular, Trump's administration and two Zionists
within it, I mean, literally born in Israel,
Zionists that are currently in our government,
Let him go.
Not a secret. Everyone's covered this. No charge.
Nobody didn't make his passport. Just let him
go back, and and and he's walking free
after he was attempting to rape a child
in this country.
So
let's talk about this bigger point, and we'll
overlap with that. So Red Pill Media put
this out. A Jewish Israeli settler has been
caught raping a 14 year old Palestinian boy
in the West Bank. Now this is not
a brand new story, but it is somewhat
new.
Even this I'm not I wasn't familiar with
this. Ask ask perplexity.
Just asked about it. Here's what they said.
The information presented in these images and tweets
refers to a real criminal case from July
2024 in Israel, which I have the sites
for,
where a 19 year old named
Yit Yitazik
Frankel
from specifically Modin Illit,
a very, very super orthodox place, was arrested
and charged with the rape and severe assault
of a 14 year old boy
in a settlement near Ramallah.
Israeli police and media confirmed the details widely,
including the particularly disturbing elements, though there is
no indication that the victim was Palestinian. Reports
consistently refer to the location and nature of
the crime, but do not specify the victim's
ethnicity.
What's also very alarming to me is that
it was very clearly documented, very clearly highlighted,
and yet still to this moment, it appears
that there's no real motion with it.
Here's the one here's Wynette. This is from
the twenty eighth. Court extends attention of the
young man from Modin Illett suspected of sodomizing
a teen.
They just they it's like they're putting this
off, and they don't wanna deal with it.
It says that extended by five days the
detention who was arrested on suspicion of sodomizing
this young boy in the showers of a
swimming pool. According to suspicion, he entered the
boy's stall while he was showering under the
pretext of eating soap, choked him, held a
knife to him, and sodomized him.
Here's the guy.
The court has extended attention. Authorities say
he threatened the victim. A court noted that
the new evidence worsened the suspicions against him,
leading to his detention being extended. You see
how crazy this is? Like, if the evidence
is so cut and dry,
why I mean,
I just think it, like, you I we'll
we'll follow-up on this. But I'll make my
point next with these other articles with where
I think this is going. Reports alleged the
attack includes extreme acts of violence. The suspect
initially confessed to the police,
confessed,
but later retracted the confession. And all this
is almost always how this goes in these
cases because they know that they have support.
Somebody probably told them, lie about it. We'll
back you up. Just my gut. Claiming it
was made under duress.
Israeli police have allowed the publication of his
name. Oh, no. Okay.
But let's also not forget, almost exclusively to
Palestinians, though, Israeli police will force them to
say whatever they want, and it's very clearly
on the record, like, that they do that.
It's all over the place. Why they would
force an Israeli, especially right now, to admit
to something like this doesn't add up, but,
you know, you can decide for yourself.
Now where I wanna go with this, and
we will follow-up on this. I mean, it's
it's just disgusting reality, and the real point
to make is how prevalent this is in
this society.
And that I in no way am I
gonna argue that that's unique to Jewish people.
It is unique in this case to the
Zionist mentality in this country. But you'll find
horrible things like this in pretty much any
society. But the reality is that in this
society,
it's not hard to see how long this
has been called out, how long it's been
allowed and festered, and in many cases,
like, almost celebrated.
First,
here's another case from this location. Moden Inlet
rape was fabricated, police say. I just thought
it was interesting to consider that now that's
where this one seems to be leaning into.
Well, no. I was forced to say that
it's not true.
This whole case came out where this five
year old was abused and raped,
or that that was what was reported and
ultimately came that they ended up turning it
on the person that said that he made
their report up. Now now maybe that does
happen, but with all that's going on, it
makes you wonder whether this was a cover
up then. Now the only reason I'm even
including that is because of what I'm gonna
show you next, and I think this is
very important to see, which most of you
know, well, after this. And including this recent
case with an Israeli who came to The
United States, works for The US or the
Israeli government, was trying to sexually abuse a
child, got caught, and they let him go.
Absolutely abhorrent.
So Sal the Agarists asked so many unanswered
questions about the Israeli pedophile Trump helped escape.
How many American children did he rape? Was
he part of the Epstein ring? Was Trump
pros per pressured by Mossad?
Why does no one from congress care? That
one really stands out to me, guys. Think
about that.
How is that not a thing that gets
brought up by anybody? I don't maybe maybe
save did Massey or Tom, Marjorie Taylor Greene
bring it up? I think maybe one of
them points to it, but I'm by and
large, if not any of them, I haven't
seen it.
Where are the courts?
The whole thing makes zero sense. He says,
why isn't the news covering the story? Some
of them did, obviously, but not like the
what I what I mean by that, what
I think he does too is, like, the
Fox, CNN, like, nightly news kinda thing. Why
was Jared Kushner involved? If if if he
was mistakenly released, why hasn't The US requested
extradition? If he was intentionally released, what's the
official explanation? Why did the DOJ initially deny
that he had happened in the first place?
Because we we know why.
Now, on top of that, I found this
weird.
So this is another story,
another horrible story
of a a migrant that,
allegedly raped this woman. I've looked into it
as why they say that because, you know,
these days, it's so many lies circulating. But,
you know, it does happen. So just the
point is not the story here, but to
show you that there's another case of the
report of a of a child being raped.
And this person says he had prior records
of sexual assault
and and multiple robberies.
Yet the Spanish government was sub subsidizing him
with our taxpayer money. Why was why was
he deported? Now I agree with that.
If this guy was a criminal, why was
he being allowed to stay? Why was nothing
done? Like, that's crazy. No matter where it
is in the world, and does happen all
over the place, and not just for specific
migrants against white people. Like, this game is
being played right now is is disgusting.
Here's what Elon
says. Anyone who commits rape, robbery, or other
violent crimes should be deported immediately.
I thought about that for a second, but
I'm like, wait a minute. So you're telling
me that you're supporting the idea that people
come from foreign countries, rape somebody, and just
get sent home?
Guys, think about that for a second. Does
that make sense to you? Like, if somebody
gets caught raping somebody, the whole point that
he was making about extradition is they should
charge them here. They should go to prison.
They should be char
Elon literally just said, send them all.
And also, that's just what happened with the
Israeli.
You get I feel like there's more to
that personally. Because what she's saying is he
was he we did made he committed crimes,
and then they didn't deport him, but they
also didn't charge him with anything. So my
point would be if somebody does commits a
crime in this country, then they should be
arrested for that crime. They should be charged
for that crime. Right? They should be dealt
with here, not sent home to a place
where they won't charge them because it's a
different country.
I mean, do we not see how obvious
that is? That seems like a really weird
thing for him to say.
But I think it makes sense when you
look at what just happened.
But here
is the bigger point of the story. American
Jewish Committee reports that we commend IDF leadership,
they write, for investigating concerning allegations of abuse
against Palestinian detainees at Sed Tiamen.
As IDF chief of staff, he said, that's
precisely these investigations that protect our soldiers in
Israel and the world and preserve our values.
Yeah. Disgusting. Because their investigation
came back to like, they rape people in
this prison. It was very publicly covered. Here
is Beth Salim, the leading Israeli human rights
group.
It's called Welcome to Hell, and they literally
talk about the torture camps and set set
Tianan and the rapes that took place are
a central part of this. On the corporate
media in Israel, they debated publicly that that
was supposed to happen.
And you know which side won, clearly.
People
stormed these places to get the people released
for being arrested for raping the Palestinians. And
by the way, it's happened many times since
then. So this is the American Jewish Committee
praising them for investigating and then lying about
the outcome.
The point is that this is happening,
allowing a rape culture like that within the
core. Now here
is a report from 2024.
Claims of Israeli sexual assault of Palestinian women
are credible according to the UN.
This is I I should have put that
at the end. This is the one that
I wanted. This is from 2014.
More Israeli soldiers reporting sexual harassment. Now this
is within the Israeli government.
Male soldiers make up the 9% of the
reports, claim 4% of two. The the point
is more Israeli soldiers
reported experiencing sexual abuse
in 2013
than they did in 2012.
The army chief of staff's women affairs adviser
has reported. So they get reports, which, again,
you can go back pretty much year to
year. Okay? This is a.
They're saying in 2012, there's reports of of
rape and sexual abuse of women in the
IDF.
Okay. They report about it. They talk about
it.
The next year, it gets worse.
There's been more soldiers now in 2013 that
have been abused. Okay.
Jump forward to 2016.
Israeli army reports rise in sexual harassment claims,
decrease in investigations.
Story story speaks for itself. Harass, leading Israeli
human lee leading Israeli newspaper. Number of reports
reported incidents has increased
every year since 2012.
Every year. So 2012, they report it. It
gets worse. 2013, they report it. It gets
worse. 2014, they report it. It gets worse.
2015, they go, what's happening? It gets even
worse. Number of reported incidents has increased every
year,
but fewer women are pursuing legal action.
Why? Because they're not investigating.
Read the article for yourself.
Here and this is the this is the
two that I've always used in the past.
This is 2017.
Now it's gone to one in six. Every
one in every six females in the IDF
have been sexually harassed according to an army
study or rather a study within the army.
One in six. So 2012 and before, it
just keeps getting worse. People point to it.
They just stop investigating.
And now it gets to the point to
one in every six women is being sexually
assaulted,
and let's find out what happens next. Jump
forward to 2022.
Well, now a third of every Israeli female
soldiers are being raped.
2021,
a third. So they report in this bombshell
report that one in every six women is
being sexually abused, and then it doubles
by twenty twenty two.
I mean, I don't know how you can
misunderstand this, guys. This is a sick problem.
Not every single person, because some people call
this stuff out, it's like, oh, protest Gaza,
but a societal problem that has been created
by a a sociopathic
Zionist ideology
that is literally cheerleading about rape and torture.
And it's horrifying, guys. And everyone's starting to
see it.
Here is a report from 2023,
the next year.
The IDF has a problem
with female soldiers.
That's the title.
Here's what it says, guys. This should make
you this is disgusting.
It seems the IDF has an internal problem
that it needs to address. This is Jerusalem
Post. A report from 2021
says that a third of Israeli female soldiers
experienced sexual harassment during their mandatory service. A
state's comptroller by the way, they always that's
the whole point of why everyone they're all
forced to go to the military, therefore, they're
all IDF in some capacity.
A state's comptroller's report and, again, there are,
like I've always pointed out, certain exceptions, so
it's let every single person, but by and
large. A state comptroller report found that less
than half of the Israeli female soldiers
who experienced harassment
even filed a complaint. So if we're being
told one in three, and they're telling you
half the people being raped don't even report
it,
that's borderline every one of them, guys. That's
so shockingly disgusting.
Of those forty four percent
of those 40 of those forty four percent
said their complaints were not handled properly. Okay.
So again,
the report found that less than half of
the people that actually
experienced harassment filed a complaint, and then 44%
of that half
said they weren't being handled properly.
And 26%
stated that the complaints were not handled at
all.
This is just chilling stuff, guys. It says,
unfortunately,
this isn't unusual
in what's considered male dominated environments
from Israeli's perspective, Israel the Israeli government's perspective.
One would assume that given these issues,
leaders in Israel would do everything in their
power to ensure that the army became a
safer place for women. Right? At least what
they project to the world
and would then push for accountability in any
harassment. Right?
However, a public letter published by these rabbis
promoted by the government,
from the religious Zionism camp, of course, stated
that, quote, four generations,
the rabbinate council has determined that women should
not serve in the army, and the conscription
of women
spoils the line, is the word they use,
that's
in Hebrew. They even they went even further
to say that because of sexual harassment, women
should not serve in the IDF. So your
issue is not that they're raping everybody in
the in the IDF that are women, but
that they're getting in the way.
So you explain to me how this perspective
is any different than what they claim Iranians
are do with women or that it's Saudi
Arabia, which they don't talk about or anybody
they don't like.
It's just in your face.
It's insulting.
Now last point on this topic.
You already saw this.
Miashem
refused to give a hair sample, and the
witness from Miami it's a weird kind of
translation. The case that rocked Israel with a
collapse. Now we covered this.
She accused her trainer of raping her in
Israel.
Now Israeli authorities,
at this moment, are still refusing to believe
that she was raped.
She she claimed she was drugged and raped
by her trainer.
Now, she says unless she submits a hair
sample.
So what they're saying is we don't believe
you unless you prove it. Well, that sure
sounds familiar, doesn't it? Remember when we were
saying we don't believe your screaming claims until
we have evidence? And they said, oh, you're
a rape denial. Yeah. Hypocrites.
They know what they were doing then. They
were lying about rape, and these monsters now
appear to be denying that she was raped.
They were using the claim of their rape
before, and now they're denying that she went
she's actually raped because it's an Israeli that
did it.
Meanwhile, the authorities promptly believe any allegation of
rape if the accused are Palestinians.
Do you realize how sick this is that
she is one of the people they kept
using? And now she comes home and she
gets raped by an Israeli trainer,
and they don't care.
Now on to the last discussion
of what's going on with the ongoing genocide.
Now, you know, it's almost
I almost wonder how this conversation has the
idea of the ceasefire deal is so ridiculous.
I don't even know who out there actually
like, every single time it's happened so far
with Blinken and now the new administration,
they just keep getting caught lying over and
over and over. And, I mean, on the
surface from mainstream administrations or rather,
you know, like institutions, I meant to say.
Like, you know, human rights groups that will
literally call it out or any number of
institutions or other even mainstream platforms.
They keep agreeing, Hamas then agrees, then Netanyahu
blows it up. What we tell you
alright. Here. I'll check this out.
If you're new, you
this is
there it is. No.
I think this was
it. Then we wrote about this many times.
Yeah. See, this is Israel. Oh, no. That's
not the one. That was it funny. One
of those is this is from 2025 in
March. Israel breaks ceasefire as planned. The earlier
one, I think it's the one before this.
My point was simple that Trump the the
ceasefire deal that Trump already plans to break.
And we told you that before it happened.
And then on like, within the week time
frame we had we told you that they
were telling you it would happen, it happened.
And yet we kept to break that down?
No. They were publicly in the Knesset saying,
We're gonna violate it in phase two because
Trump said we could, and we can't piece
that together?
No. We're just being lied to by media,
by government, because they're compromised or don't care.
And so the point is, again, yet again,
Netanyahu wrote the latest ceasefire plan.
Hamas agreed to it, and Netanyahu killed it.
It's every single time. And so they just
keep pretending like Hamas won't let it happen.
It says, Herets confirmed that Egypt took the
plan that Netanyahu wrote, told Palestinians to agree
to it word for word, and Israel was
the one that broke it yet again. Every
time. Every single time.
Seth Dillon says, this was this Donald Trump
says, the fastest way to end humanitarian crises
in Gaza is for Hamas to surrender and
release the hostages. That is the dumbest take
in the room. One, because they've already tried
to do that more than once, and Israel
keeps saying no. The last time before this
one we're talking about, they literally said that
we'll do everything you're asking. We'll step aside.
We'll put our weapons down.
And Israel was the one that put Hamas
back in the agreement.
They were saying, look. We'll step aside, and
Israel disagreed to that and inserted back that
Hamas was still involved in the government.
It's so many people acted like that was
unbelievable, like it's not true. It was on
the record.
Just because it was so hard to make
sense with the narrative, people dismissed it. It's
because they need Hamas in the context that
they're framing it to justify what they're doing.
Because they want everyone killed. They want everyone
moved to this new location. That's what's happening.
And on top of that, again, they've turned
down the deal that would have done that
many times.
This person says, this was true on October
8, and it remains true today. Ridiculous. And
I can't even tell if this is satire,
so I can't tell if he's trying to
be funny about it. He says, anyone who
hasn't been calling for Hamas to surrender and
release the hostages could never convince me that
they actually care.
Just for sake of conversation, pretending it's real
because a lot of people are making that
point. It has got to be the they
are either dishonest or they just genuinely don't
know, like, the basic facts of the situation.
Probably both.
Comrade Misty simply points out in regard to
the Gaza plan, the Gaza trust plan, which
I will include again today right here, but
I won't go through it. Check out the
last show.
She simply says, they are genociding entire population
for luxury tourism.
You don't you don't hate them enough.
US
post war god's plan calls for temporary relocation.
In other words, forced ethnic cleansing of residents
to clear the way for luxury tourism.
It's just, you know, every definition of this
stuff. There's so many, like, uneducated people that
somehow have been convinced they know everything about
a situation that are all over the mainstream
alternate beauty right now. It's it's clost it's
horrifying.
And out there literally talking about things that
so clearly don't know and laughing at people
that actually know what they're talking about. And
it's not even about, like, good, bad Israel.
It's about, like, fundamental facts that anyone can
prove they cared that they, like, laugh off
because that's not what the narrative said. You
know? It's really stupid stuff. The point though
is that this is obviously a genocide. This
is obviously ethnic cleansing by the exact definition
of the word.
Even if you agree with Israel, it's still
ethnic cleansing, guys. That's what it means. It's
very, very clear.
This is about the bigger point, though, of
what they're trying to turn this into. And,
I mean, again, watch the last show.
This is a smart city. Right? This is
quite literally everything we thought we were that
the Republicans thought they were fighting.
Land trust and tokenization. And, yeah, I mean,
I'll show you very quickly.
For example,
under and for check out the, the Elon
Musk smart manufacturing
zone.
This is under Gaza planned city. Zero ground
construction. It says modern,
AI powered, smart planned cities,
and they're inner side. The services and economy
of these cities will be done through ID
based digital system.
Great. So everything we're fighting
That the Republican team is rolling out in
Gaza, though, but it's okay because we don't
care over the
who can make sense of this without acknowledging
that you're being a hypocrite?
And just a a post Trump's post war
Gaza plan proposes a voluntary mass removal of
Gaza's 2,000,000, they keep writing, even though they've
admitted they know they've killed probably half a
million people
with 5,000 cash dollar cash payments. Of course,
not cash payments, so AF post is incorrect,
which, you know, makes you should question all
these, like, like, these kind of, like,
you know, posts of what happens every day.
There are a lot of them who are
just kind of repeating what's in the headlines.
K? The idea is that it's not cash.
It's very clearly they give them digital payments.
They can then exchange tokens for the housing
systems they're gonna build for them. That's what
they're talking about. So and and and in
doing so, they have to sign over their
rights to any kind of ownership of what
was happening in Gaza because that's what it's
always been about.
Overall,
bribing them with, you know, what, pen peanuts
after they got their families murdered, raped, and
tortured, But not even real money. Money that
has to be then used to change in
for the fake system they're building for you.
All under the Abraham Accords because, you know,
with the GHF, by the way, which is
also true, the Gaza Health Humanitarian
Foundation, which is Mossad murdering people in the
food lines right now, They're the ones supposedly
doing,
was it security?
One of basically, the security or or it
was aid in particular. But then on the
security side of it, at least one group
was academy. Black or,
Blackwater.
Very, very, very pro Israel. Like, these people
are not on the side of the Palestinians.
They're creating a concentration camp like they do
everywhere else.
So on the ground, as this is happening,
right, so what they're telling him is you
gotta move. You gotta move over there because
we're gonna build this for you. We're trying
to fight Hamas.
No Palestinian believes that, and they're not even
trying to lie to the Palestinians. The Palestinians
know. The god the Israelis know what they're
doing, and they know the Palestinians know what
they're doing. They're trying to exit just murder
everyone they can.
It's pretty obvious to prove.
So, what they're doing is telling the world
that false narrative. So, liars out there can
say, they're just trying to save them all
which is just insane to me. I should
go to this point first.
Oh, dang it. Where was that?
Right here. This feels like it should go
next,
which is the what they're doing
to increase the aid all of a sudden,
but only to the ISIS linked dark dealing
proxy warlord, Abu Shabaab, which is literally what
he is. Even in Knesset, they've publicly admitted
this. They've discussed his ISIS connections. But let's
pretend ISIS is working with Hamas. Right? It's
just so stupid.
This guy, who is the same people that
were stealing the aid they claimed was Hamas
before, that was working for Israel, it's all
very proven.
Robert and I talked about it. It's on
the record, guys.
The point is they're giving them a little
bit more aid and shifting them to a
new location and saying, well, you have to
go to that new spot to get aid
if you don't wanna starve to death. So
they're just continuing this shuffle where they're pushing
them to the next location.
As it says,
the final phase of genocide concentration
concentrate the entire
group in a gang run concentration camp on
Egypt's borders, wipe out everything remaining in the
Syoss, Gaza City, and Daire Al Bala, and
then mass expulsion. That's what they're building towards.
And it goes, reminder, the ISIS linked Abu
Shabaab criminal gang is armed, financed, supported, and
run by Israel.
It's not hard to see. That's an Israeli
article discussing what we've already proven to you
more than once.
So Ryan Grim,
whenever the Israeli military takes losses, which it
does pretty much consistently in this situation, the
attacks on civilians ramp up exponentially, which shows
you the kind of like, this petty
hatred, right, to where they lose in regard
to fighting Hamas, and all of a sudden
they, you know, just decide to kill civilians
because they're angry.
It's disgusting.
And it is insane Israeli bombardment on the
twenty ninth has been ongoing for hours. Think
about why they're still bombarding
flattened areas where people are living in tents.
But there are still the clowns out there
pretending like this isn't ethnic cleansing, isn't a
genocide.
Aaron Mate,
more horrifying images by the way of children
bombed in these areas. It happens every single
day. Says, we've seen countless Israeli atrocities, but
not but not every atrocity is captured on
camera. So Israel has exterminated, maimed, and traumatized
far more Palestinians in Gaza than we could
possibly know. Yet even the fraction of Israeli
massacres that we do see is treated as
normal.
Gaza is a worse collective moral failure than
the Nazi holocaust.
Back then, the world wasn't exposed to the
horrors of the concentration camps in this holocaust.
They've live streamed every day, and we're funding
it.
I'm I I this stuff
is in my nightmares, guys.
I I just I just it's it's just
the the reality of our worst possible nightmare
of what the world is like.
And I don't believe even for a moment
this is even the majority. I do believe
though that the worst parts of our world
are, like,
screaming for control right now.
Maybe because we're slowly awakening to the problem,
but nonetheless,
dangerous.
Assad, Israel murderers, journalists because they don't want
you to see things like this.
It's every day. You realize the this is
not like the same old ones repeated that
have been shown over the last year. Every
single day, there is more examples of children
being bombed in buildings and they're pulling the
it's every and look. That's that's Twitter. Just
randomly stopping it like it does all the
time when it's videos that they don't want
you to see.
Every day. Every day. Like and some of
them get, you know, like the the girl
that people identified that was shredded hanging off
that building. Right? These are real people with
lives and dreams and hopes and families. And
every single day, they're killed in this country
because they hate them.
Brian Grim
points out what,
Musaab Abu Toa says Israeli
terrorist forces have bombed families ex ex
evacuating almost your neighborhood. So, again, they're saying
move this direction.
And as they do, they bomb them on
the way.
We heard the Green Beret in regard to
the food lines where they said march that
way, and they were, like, waiting along the
road to shoot at them as they went,
like like it was some game.
But he's a liar. No. They've there's been
75 people that have told us that. The
idea clearly is that just like from day
one, on October 8, what were we telling
you?
Egypt told us they were bombing the food
lines. Egypt said they were bombing people as
they tried to flee. Egypt said they bombed
the crossing. Oh, yeah. And that's happened every
single time since. Every single time they say,
go over there. They bomb where they're going.
They bomb where they were. They bomb them
on the way. It is the this will
guys, going forward in history, this will be
looked back on in so many ways that
we can
I get honestly, get the sense, like, what
Aaron is saying is not even getting close
to the reality? Like, it's worse. This will
be something that we I mean, remember what
I said in the beginning? I said, this
will be remembered for ten thousand years.
You see why I was saying that? Because
this is something that is going to change
things more ways than we could possibly understand.
And as Ryan says,
bombed if you stay, bombed if you go.
Anybody honest can see this. This one says,
terrorist Israeli forces have just carried out and
this is all happening
on the first. This is yesterday.
Carried out a terrorist strike on people evacuating
their houses.
So they say again, go over there for
food, and they keep killing them as they
come out to flee to the area they
told them to go to. Seven people died
in this one strike.
Ryan Grim, Israel continues to attack the civilians
they have told to flee
as they flee.
Israel Exposed
points out the Israeli army called the young
man Mohammed al Tabasi,
originally from Tell Assultan in Rafah,
and ordered him to leave his tent,
stand on a dune
in the Sawafi area in Khan Yunus behind
the Rama camp for disabled displaced people so
they could target him alone. He was told
that if he refused, knowing that they were
going to shoot at him, that his family
in the camp would be targeted instead.
That's the sociopathic,
psychopathic elements we're dealing with. We're gonna murder
your family if you don't come out and
let us shoot you.
Didn't we just kinda see something similar with
the ice at the door of that barbershop
going, We'll we'll get your family then. Yes.
Because we're dealing with similar mentalities here.
It says he was told that if he
refused, they'd go after his family. He bid
farewell to his loved ones and said, quote,
let's let people pray for me and forgive
me. He ran toward the sand dune, raised
his hands to begin prayer, and they bombed
him.
If you'd like to read more about this,
as reported by the Euromaid Human Rights Group
that documented the entire event,
targeted for refusing to cooperate, disturbing testimonies, detail
Israeli army's harassment, killing of civilians in Gaza.
See, there's so much of this going on,
And at least at least so far, we
haven't seen any accountability of, like, individual IDF
members despite how much they, like, dance and
laugh and post videos of the worst things
we've ever seen. So I bet you many
of them think that they're never gonna get
held accountable. I hope they're wrong. And stuff
like this that show you they're just laughing
in your face.
Catherine Austin Fitts
points to what Saat Mohammed Safa says and
says, this is not Hiroshima. This is Gaza.
Gaza is nearly three times smaller than Hiroshima,
and Israel has dropped the equivalent
of nearly 10 atomic bombs on Gaza.
Easily backed up by any human rights group,
any institution,
it's true.
More, by the way, combined than pretty much
every major war. Don't stop talking about Gaza
as if your life depends on it, he
says, because their lives depend on it.
And look at what they're bombing. I mean,
look at the area before they bomb it.
That's a bombed out broken area, and they
bomb it anyway.
Probably because they're trying to survive in there.
Catherine Austin Fitts says, ever wonder what Donald
j Trump would say if we bomb Mar
A Lago using taxpayer money?
Proposed to move the Trump family and friends
out since it was such a mess as
he framed Gaza, rebuilt a lovely waterfront development
that we owned and promised we would give
each of the Trump family members a new
apartment in our new beautiful resort
so they should not complain because that was
a good deal. Right?
Exactly.
On top of that, give them tokenized digital
money that they have to give back to
me to be able to take, you know,
quote, control over something you don't own. Right?
Now I just had a secondary thought, by
the way. First,
obviously, it's the same idea. You're you're murdering
people's families. You're bombing their homes. You're forcing
them out of where they live. And then
saying, you should you it's insulting to not
take what we hand you, even though it's
another place where we're you're in control of
our lives and we have no freedom and
Israel still will kill us. But it's okay
though because it's insulting for you to say
no. Now secondarily by the way, I think
it's like think about this.
Just saying this right now
is interesting to me with people that are
like going out like they put up that
poster of Vance
that says, arrest him for for what did
it say? For,
it was something like weakness or something like
that. Like, it wasn't it just said
or, you know, $1,000,000
wanted. And it was, like I forgot what
the excuse me.
And hiccups all of a sudden, what the
term was they used. But the point was
there was a a crosshair on his head,
which, yes, can in one sense mean
kill them. And we could even say probably
is what they meant, but you don't know
that, and you can't then infer that means
kill them, and then everyone they're making this
huge push. I bet you something happens to
this person. They're all tagging Kash Patel and
Bongino or or and Bam Bondi. They just
went after a woman for flipping off and
bumping someone's phone that might get they're being
sued and expelled.
The point though is that you can see
a world in which they go after people,
even for me reading this, for saying something
like that.
Even though it's not even about the actual
claim of doing it, it's about an analogy
point. But the the, you know, the woke
right is just as crazy as the woke
left for things like this and we'll start
making a case for why you suddenly threatened
to draw. Lumer would do stuff like that.
Just how ridiculous this has gotten today.
Now
world's leading genocide scholars
scholars association says Israel is committing a genocide.
Now you all know this already,
but it's important how how complete this has
become. The International Association of Genocide Scholars
passed a resolution determining Israel was committing a
genocide with the support of 86% of its
members, meaning they support that that is what's
happening.
Adi,
Haku,
probably mispronouncing that,
shows you this.
Quote, this is a definitive statement from the
experts in the field of genocide studies. That's
what is going on in the ground in
Gaza is a genocide, says the president.
Pretty easy.
Mohammed Safa points out the bigger picture, the
obvious. UN has said it's genocide.
He, the, Red Cross said it's genocide.
The PBA said it's genocide. The ICJ says
genocide. The ICC said it's genocide. Pretty much
every human rights group, Doctors Without Borders, I
mean, all of them. By the way, apparently,
Doctors Without Borders is now being called a
terrorist organization. Not a joke. They're claiming that
they're working for Hamas in The is The
US overlap UN conversation. Can you I mean,
it's just so insane how dumb this has
got. How it's how dumb it's become rather.
So Hamas
is now Doctors Without Borders because they dare
not. They they just keep calling out your
lies is what it really is. Anyway, he
goes, anyone who knows anything about genocide has
now said it's a genocide. Now, yes.
Is it possible that they're all lying? Yeah.
That's all anything is possible, and you should
always consider them all. Be objective.
But
unless there's evidence that shows that and all
you're doing is they're probably lying, then you're
ignoring that the the vast majority of the
experts on topic are telling us the case.
Now, we just went through COVID where the
vast majority of the experts were telling you,
well, that's actually not even really true. But
in the in the beginning,
the majority of the mainstream push was that
it was safe. And that's not true. Right?
So you should question it. But again, we
had evidence that showed you it was dangerous.
And again, you go forward like another six
months. No. I argue that the a huge
portion of experts that weren't being acknowledged were
telling you it was dangerous. Either way, the
reality is that every single one of these
entities have have now shown you it as
genocide. We can prove it's genocide. They're committing
a genocide. They're posting their genocide. They're laughing
about it. They're telling you they're gonna starve
them. And it's just obvious what's happening. We
shouldn't even have to debate about it. But
you get these idiots like this. You get
Alan Dershowitz that comes out and goes, there's
no reasonable definition of genocide that even comes
close to characterizing Israel's self defense.
I mean, it just takes a special I
mean, that is him
blindly and desperately taking the side of Israel
over every single other standing on the conversation.
And so and, again, that's what that's what,
Muhammad said there. Everyone who's standing
says genocide. The only people not saying that
are people like this, who are interested in
who has, you know, vested interest in the
Zionist agenda or are trying to destroy this
country. The so called experts, he says, who
have claimed that Israel has committed genocide are
willfully misusing the term. No. Not even remotely.
And exploiting their claimed expertise to promote a
bigoted gender. Oh, that's what it is. All
of them just hate Israel. Right? All of
them at the core, not even just Israel,
they hate Jews.
That's what he's saying.
That's really what they mean.
So every single group ever that accuses them
of a crime just actually hates them. At
some point, this has to become stupid. Right?
It's just clearly not the reality of what's
happening, even though there's probably an overlap. No
objective expert would agree with them, except literally
all of them do. See how dumb that
is? Like, so you every person was standing,
that's the truth. Every one of them, Limpkin
Institute, all of them are telling you it's
genocide. So what he's saying is no objective
experts. All I mean is just literally no
expert on genocide in the world is as
objective.
The time has come for the conference of
unbiased experts. You can't
and I just pushed that below, by the
way.
Asalrad
points out what Israel said on Twitter, which
is embarrassing.
It goes, above all, the experts on genocide
have set a historic precedent for the first
time. Genocide scholars accuse the very victim
of genocide.
Oh, so you're the victim in this situation.
Right? Or no. They're still pointing to October
7, mind you. So even if you wanna
claim that everything you lied about that day
happened, even though we can prove that's not
true and that you killed most of the
people on that day, which has now become
the fact,
you've committed a genocide for over a year.
So is it just supposed to be ignored
because that happened on that day even though
you lied about it? I mean, you just
can't make sense of this. They're still pretending
they're victims right now,
and everyone's waking up to it.
Ryan Grim,
the world's leading association of genocide scholars has
passed the resolution. We just read that. Right?
And Ryan Grim says, found some new people
for The US to sanction.
Watch.
Rubio, they they they they'll do what their
masters tell
them. Caitlin Johnstone reports what Ahmed Shehada says,
which is the world's leading genocide scholar, same
point, Israel committing genocide in Gaza. Caitlin says
everyone needs to understand that there that there
is no genocide in Gaza is not a
claim that can be taken seriously.
All of human rights all human rights groups
and the overwhelming majority of genocide scholars all
agree it's genocide. The debate is over. Hasbar
is lost. That is true.
Here is what, Elon Papa had to say
about the understanding
of what happened in, like, the first knock
button before and after,
and how Israel has taken careful care to
cover that up.
And just to think about not only what
they're trying to do in real time, but
what they will continue to do if we
allow this to go forward.
Of the Jewish community themselves
wrote in their diaries that what the Israelis
did in October 1948 was not very different
from what the Nazis did in the second
World War. So within nine months,
half of Palestine's population was expelled.
Half of Palestine's villages
were demolished, and most of the Palestinian towns
were wiped out.
The Israelis, already in August 1948 began an
operation that I call member of site in
order to wipe out any,
residue and remnant of the Palestinian existence in
Palestine.
They built Jewish, colonies and settlements
over the destroyed Palestinian villages, quite often giving
them a Hebrew name that resembled the Arab
name of the village. Thus, Safaria became Sipori,
Libya became Lavi, and so on. On other
villages, the Israeli planted forests, Israelis imported 10,000
pine trees from Europe to cover the Palestinian
villages
that were, destroyed in the catastrophe of forty
eight. I can tell you as a second
generation of, European settler that we don't do
well in, the climate of the Middle East,
and the same happened to the pine trees
of Israel. Many of them became very ill,
and where they died, the old orchards and
olive trees came back to claim,
their presence on the land that used to
be Palestine.
He's an important person to listen to in
this conversation.
So Caitlin Johnstone
points out antiwar.com.
Israeli officials say Israel may halt the meager
aid entered Northern Gaza amid the famine. The
Israeli military is trying to force more than
1,000,000 civilians in Gaza
where famine is taking place to move southern.
And now the additional part, as we showed
earlier, is giving claiming to have more aid
in the in the point you might have
to go to and then killing them along
the way. Caitlin says, Israel,
we're going to starve Gaza. Because realize, they're
stating that for what? The fifteenth time?
The West?
Us, rather. Israel's starving Gaza.
Israel? It's anti Semitic to say we're starving
Gaza. The West? Okay. Sorry.
Israel? We're going to starve Gaza some more.
It's just this dumb cycle. We watch them
do it. They tell you they're doing it,
and we get gaslit by people in power.
Now let's remember this clip.
And remember, this is, by the way, not
a secret. K? Their actual statement
or their, you know, whatever you wanna call
it, tagline, motto,
for Mossad,
by way of deception, thou shalt do war.
Look it up. It's very real. So in
that sense, and with everything else we've talked
about today, let's not forget this important gem.
Remember when Mossad admitted that it conducts psyops
all around the world?
Here it is again.
I don't know how I did that. See,
I I swear I do that almost every
time.
I think what I do while I'm grabbing
this, I number them, like, one through whatever.
And I think I just double up on
a number, and I lose a video somehow.
And I have to talk to you while
I download this.
If you don't if you remember this clip,
this was off the back of the,
pager attack. Actually, I'll grab that I'll grab
that too while we're doing this.
And it's the conversation
that the Mossad agent had in his you
know, the same way they dress up when
they're pretending to be Hamas, by the way,
and tells,
sixty minutes.
Oh, here's that. Israeli in Israel's infiltration of
US tech in light of Lebanon's pager attack.
The point telling her,
we create a pretend world.
It's the same thing we just talked about
with Carbine,
with Gideon. It's the same thing that Israel
creates companies that they then use to execute
their Israeli agendas, their intelligence agendas. The CIA
does the same thing. The point though is
that this is important in regard to the
infiltration of our country,
and it's what they're doing. And it's not
just our country. It's all around the world.
The UK is dealing with a similar problem.
But this
is what he said, and I think it's
important with this and the next clip we're
gonna play.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously,
they didn't know that they were buying it
from Israel. Who did they buy it from
or think they were buying it from? We
have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that have no way been traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
That's not that's not like a fake thing,
guys. The world is our stage. I mean,
you can bind that with what they're doing.
You combine that with the statements in the
Knesset that they can legislate anywhere in the
world, that they're not bound by international law.
It takes a special kind of willful ignorance
to not acknowledge what this government is doing.
It's right in your face. Literally, I mean,
look, if they're telling you the world is
their stage, they can make fake companies to
execute their intelligence agendas, that's me going, I
effing told you so. That's exactly what I've
been telling you for how long. You know?
And and it's everywhere you look. And now
we've got AI Gideon precrime tools that were
built by Israel that are being rolled out.
I mean, come on, guys. This is where
I need people in the partisan side who
are honest to start calling this stuff out
because you're on the side of the right
you're on the right side of history with
this stuff, guys, and you're being led by
the screaming people at the top of the
status quo. And I'm not even talking about
corporate media here.
So going forward,
there's two more points I wanna make, really.
Just what Israel did elsewhere and some some
final points on foreign policy because we have,
we're we're looking good. We're not too long
today.
You might have seen that Israel has has
continued to bomb Yemen, which I just pointed
out the other day in regard to what
they want to happen with Gaza.
There's a very clear central kind of, you
know, intersection
right there that they have been coveting for
a very long time. And, also, they need
Yemen out of the way. And that's why
they've I've how long have we talked about
this? Iran is an issue for them, and
that's why they've been trying to deal with
other ways around it. Right? Because the the,
you know, the Persian Gulf and the whole,
Strait Of Hormuz,
Iran can control that. They can shut it
down. So they need to control the Baba
Mandev Strait on the other side, which is
where Yemen meets,
Africa.
And then, of course, they have this the
Egypt aspect of it in the Sinai, and
they they control these locations. Right? So they
need to get that Yemen part of it
down there, but they're also in regard to
you know, it comes down to not just
the flow of oil and goods around the
corn of Africa, right, not the corn of
Africa, but the, you know, the Mesopotamian area.
But it also comes back to the idea
of the potential, potential pipelines
and different things that if you could line
up these old deals they've presented, and it
all goes right through this area. So this
is is in addition to all of that.
This is just them, I think, maliciously going
after people that they
you know, I it it's my opinion,
but politicians in the world who are calling
out Israel.
Now, it's harder to make that happen in
a place like the you know, The US
and The UK, but we see the threats.
Our own people, like our ex CIA out
there, will tell you that's what they do.
Many of them will speak out about it.
Actually, before I talk about this,
here's a clip that you probably remember.
And this is,
oh, it was on Piers Morgan, actually. And
it was with, what's his name? Cenk Uygur.
And it's the
pretend
son
of the well, I only say pretend because
of the way but he's the, you know,
son of the Hamas guy that kind of
does the circuit and acts like he, you
know, knows and he speaks on behalf of,
like, the anti Hamas. It's very, very weird.
And, of course, he's, you know, one of
these frequent kind of MEMRI,
you know, that that fake platform is run
by Israeli intelligence that Bloomberg and Jones and
everyone loves to point to and go look
at how bad Muslims are. It's literally run
by Israeli intelligence. You can look it up.
The point is that this guy said on
the air,
slipped up, I think, that they'll go after
any politician no matter where they are if
they don't agree with Israel's agenda. And I
think we're watching that play out.
In a way, it doesn't matter where they
are. Even if they are politicians in the
West, they are going to fall.
And they said this previously Hold on. Did
you hear what he just said? And remember,
he's an Israeli agent. Are you saying Israel
will murder politicians in the West? What what
do you mean the politicians in the West
will fall? Yeah. We will not vote for
them anymore. Oh, well, you don't vote for
them now. You're not in our country. We
have the right to bring them up and
to bring them down. Who is we, and
how are you bringing down politicians in the
West if they dare to defy Israel?
Now that was cut, but that it was
very well encapsulated because he did just like
that. When he basically just smiled in a
weird, like, like,
very creepy way when asked point blank, what
do you mean by that? And I mean,
he said it very clearly. It will bring
them down. Like, oh, we'll we'll vote for
you. It's like, well, that was a pretty
clumsy response because, like, rightly so, you don't
vote now. You know, so clearly, he was
threatening politicians no matter where they are if
they don't side with Israel.
Really not hard to recognize. So when we
see things like this, I think we're watching
that play out. Now here's what Abby wrote.
Israel can murder the prime minister of is
of Yemen with zero consequences.
If Yemen killed Netanyahu, nukes would already be
flying. Now on top of that, it's now
been confirmed that Yemeni prime minister oh, actually,
the next one I'm what I was thinking
of. Anyway, was assassinated by IDF airstrike. They've
already claimed it. He was killed alongside a
number of state ministers, doing what Yemen's presidential
office says was a routine government workshop.
This is the point.
Israel wiped out the civilian leadership,
not military, the civilian leadership of Yemen, but
left the military leadership intact.
Unclear what advantage they get from these mass
assassinations of political figures.
Houthis now saying a line has been crossed
and there'll be consequences. There'll be retaliation,
which they should. They have every right to,
especially based on the argument Israel puts out
every day. You know, that they have the
right to defend themselves. The point though is
that this is focused on the civilian element.
So I argue it's because they were the
ones standing up and saying Israel's committing genocide.
And maybe they hoped the military would kind
of fall in line, but I think they
misjudged the Houthis and what they've shown
well before October 7 that they have stood
up against the power structure. It's been going
on a long time. I'm not even saying
that means they're good guy. It just means
that they are standing at great expense to
themselves for the people of Yemen against the
people trying to destroy the country. Pretty clear
to me. I cite for yourself.
Here,
all we're seeing is Israel deliberately publicly targeting
civilian government,
executing them all, and acting like that's okay.
I just think that's shocking.
And, oh, that was I guess this is
I should've played I had it lined up
separately.
But, yeah, that's and this is a shout
out to Gary O'Brien for reminding me of
that.
So they're
I think it's worth considering that they're just
simply taking out people that they can.
This is the member, of
wait. Was it was she the,
just a member of parliament? I remember I
sure remember she was, you know, above that,
but,
Irene Montero, Israel just assassinated Yemen's prime minister,
and nothing happens.
Israel was the only entity that can commit
genocide, bomb five countries, kill a prime minister,
and still claim to be the victim. That's
what she just said. So get ready for
her to be targeted. I'm genuinely mean that.
Like this, that is
the obvious truth, and you're not allowed to
say that in power today.
Said John Fetterman showing you the other side
of the conversation.
He goes, thank you. Next,
moron.
I mean, you can look. You it doesn't
matter how you look. You claiming
that an entire group you know, they're all
terrorists, so it doesn't make any. I mean,
even claiming they're terrorists, you understand. Like, how
what what point in time did we just
accept that our government could claim terrorism and
then just murder anybody in the area?
I just don't even know if that makes
sense. Like, even I mean, I thought in
the historical point, not even that long ago,
we used to pretend like we wanted to
put them on trial, didn't we? You know,
it just seems so crazy how quickly this
got ridiculous. And now you have morons like
Fetterman who have been put in place by
people that I think are controlling them and
are ultimately just going, yeah, murder more people
that we don't like.
I mean, it just this is the point
at which we need to start being real
about how bad this is going.
Now, of course, Alex Jones doing his you
do usual duty is out there going, yeah.
Let's go after Venezuela,
which is crazy. He goes, I'll say it.
I'm for removing the Venezuelan dictatorship.
You know? By dictatorship, it means a group
that was voted in by popular vote and
supported by major hundreds of international observers. Right?
Somebody that even Jimmy Carter of the past
said was one of the best democracy. Like,
it's just I'm not saying I can prove
that. We should question it. And frankly, I
think it's hard to believe that anything like
that exists, especially with governments and manipulation, including
these Venezuelans.
However, as always, evidence shows us one thing,
and all you get is them yelling a
different narrative. The evidence speaks for itself. The
reality is that that what they claim about
Venezuela has been lies you can prove. The
starvation, what what they did to their government,
what they did to their people. They lie.
They like, they lie in Syria, like they
lie in Libya, like they lie, lie, lie.
But Jones is like, yay. I like the
government lies because we're the rebels fighting the
deep state. Pretty sure the same deep state
you said you're fighting was just trying to
overthrow Venezuela. Right?
Right? When it was Biden. Right? And now
you wanna do it too?
Anybody else can piece that together, guys. He's
supporting the deep state agenda,
if anything he says makes sense.
Daniel says, how can we ever finally bury
neoconism
when the anti neo cons, in quotes, all
become neo cons when it's their pet project?
This is why I love Daniel McCandums. And
we we I don't think we agree on
everything, but he just has integrity. And he's
calling it like he sees it. And he
says, let's be clear here. This regime change
Alex Jones is pushing will benefit the very
elites that he has made untold millions denouncing
throughout his career.
Yep.
That's pretty clear.
Now, of course, I there's one reason. I
think there's many of them. Venezuela.
President says Israel's committing genocide. Right? Just included
what we were just talking about. I honestly
don't even think that's the primary point.
The United States has been going after Venezuela
for a really long time. But Israel, just
like everything else that's happening through the countries
they control, has worked its way into this
conversation or maybe it's been there the entire
time. The last time we talked about this
was when Elon Musk was trying to manipulate
the con the election through Twitter
and was trying to lie about what happened
and he got caught lying many times. The
point was that the person they wanted in
power
was literally publicly backed by Israel, wrote a
letter to Israel asking them to regime change
the government.
You just I mean, see, it's not me
trying to make these forces in. It is
the conversation. It's happening. It's right in front
of you. So I just think it's interesting
the people who support it.
And
Trump just recently shot, and as he says,
shot out a drug carrying vote from Venezuela.
Now I'm willing to bet you that this
has evolved in the last hour.
Let me know if you see anything else.
This is just what I was just saying.
Why would the Trump administration shoot the CIA
boats? Kinda making a joke, but, you know,
CIA has been a prolific trafficker. Right? Ask
Gary Webb. Right? Can't anymore. He shot himself
twice in the head as we're told.
The point is clearly that they've been involved.
They've been caught many times, you know, air
America and all these. It's not a secret,
guys.
Con in the Contras, I mean, this is
this is where this all there's many of
these overlapping points.
So
the joke is about, you know, going after
what they're involved with. But, really, it's about
trying to say that the Venezuela is a
drug cartel. Okay. Well, my point is always,
just it's just like the lies about the
crime in cities. Okay.
There is drug trafficking in these countries, but
Colombia
is leading that situation every year. But they're
an ally, so we don't care about that.
Right? It pales in comparison to what Venezuela
does or what happens to that country. And
in many cases, you could probably argue with
the CIA doing it in the first place.
Overall, it wouldn't surprise me if Maduro was
involved with that. I think all governments are
capable of all those kind of things. The
point overall is that you're being a hypocrite
by claiming they're the biggest focus of this
crime drug trafficking when you're supporting the lead
leading drug traffickers in the world. It's just
that's the same thing they do everywhere. We're
fighting terrorism, but we're supporting the biggest terrorist
in the world. You know? We're fighting Islam,
but we're arming the worst ones in the
world. It's what they do. It's a fact
that it's their policy.
But here's the report
from this is for earlier. This is from
middle of the day. Trump says US strike
on vessel in Caribbean targeted Venezuela's Trende Aragua
gang. Killed 11.
None of this really adds up to me.
It says, president Trump says Tuesday that The
US has carried out a strike on Southern
Caribbean against a drug carrying vessel
that departed from Venezuela and was operated by
Trendy, Iraq.
No indication how they knew that. Maybe they're
on the ground. I mean, who knows? If
it's Venezuela, right? So it's not somewhere they're
supposed to be operating.
You know, and it's also a a speedboat.
I'll show you. I mean, just I'll show
you this quick so you can see it.
That's what we're talking
about. I will speedboat.
We'll come back to it.
And 11 people and and and really no
indication there's anything in air. It doesn't seem
like you can see anything, like, being shit
trafficked. But, again, maybe it's in there somewhere
we can't see. My bigger point is at
what point did we just start executing people
because of drug trafficking?
Same point I made before about even terrorists.
I mean, there was a point at which
we argued that was the last resort. Even
for those people that we're supposed to try
them and put them on, not anymore.
The president said in a social media post
that 11 people were killed in the military
operation, and he posted a video of a
small vessel appearing to explode in flames. Now
to be clear, I'm not even saying
any of my opinion in general, by the
way. I'm not even saying that I think
that it should go you know, that we
shouldn't kill them. I mean, I don't think
that it should be giving them the ability
to execute people
because of claims
will obviously be abused by dishonest governments, which
we know has happened. But, I mean, it's
my point is not that we should you
know? I mean, it's just it's not about
whether we should or shouldn't do that. It's
about them lying about doing it. That's the
point. But it says, quote, the strike occurred
while the terrorists were at sea
in international waters, transporting illegal narcotics. Well, so
this I find very interesting in in and
of itself.
Okay.
So maritime law and all that. Right?
Whose law jurisdiction are they supposed to be
under while they're in a boat in the
middle of the ocean?
I mean, think about that. Not even every
country's drug laws line up. So in what
world does the US government think that it
can dictate or put its US law on
international waters and enforce that law everywhere in
the world?
These are very important questions to be asking
yourself. We're gonna come back to this because
I don't feel like this is going away.
Like, I think this is gonna develop over
the next couple of weeks.
He says, no forces US forces were harmed.
Please let this serve as the notice to
anybody for even thinking about bringing drugs that
will just kill people.
Right. The belligerence of the US government is
very clear today.
The video, which is and by the way,
if you think it's about drug trafficking, you're
missing the entire point. The video, which is
largely in black and white, which by the
way is also always the point, you know
they've got better technology than that. Right? So
ask yourself why we always get these grainy,
hard to read videos because they don't want
you to get details. They don't want you
to be able to see what they're holding,
what their name tags say. You know, what
I'm just hypothetical.
Because those things give you more details, and
you'll probably end up finding out that they
weren't what they were claiming.
Gut, obviously.
It says it's not clear enough to see
if the craft is carrying as many as
11 people. Doesn't look like it to me,
by the way. The videos also did not
show any large or clear stashes of drugs
inside the boat. It says white house did
not immediately explain how the military determined that
those people were trendy, Aragua.
The US recently announced plans to boost its
maritime force in the waters off Venezuela to
combat threats from Venezuelan drug cartels. So it
very well could be that they just bombed
a boat to be able to give you
the argument they're going after drug cartels because
that's not even remotely what they're gonna be
doing. But this sets the tone
as, see, we're going at the drug cartels.
So then we can look the other direction
and pretend that's what's happening.
You know, here's thoughts that have come up
in my head. Overall, you know they're capable
of that. And, again, I don't think they
care about drugs, guys. Your government has shown
that pretty much consistently over its entire existence.
They care about using it to control your
life. They sure sell don't care about giving
people drugs, giving people drugs or flooding other
countries with drugs. They don't care about drugs.
And on top of that, especially from a
libertarian perspective, which is what a lot of
the Republican side pretends they are right now,
you're not supposed to care about it either.
But but suddenly, Trump does it, so we
have to care if drugs are bad. Right?
Maduro has insisted that The US is building
a false drug trafficking narrative
to try to force him out of office,
which, by the way,
that has happened. Like, you know that's been
the case from multiple administrations,
whether drugs or other narratives, for decades.
So, it's kinda hard to It's kind of
obvious to acknowledge that's most likely what's happening
based on their history.
But the UN the latest UN drug
world drug report shows that various countries in
South America, including Colombia, Ecuador, Peru,
all of them,
reported larger cocaine seizures in 2022 than did
like, okay.
Many places have a larger drug problem, but
they don't care about it because they don't
have an interest in them, at least right
now. That's what's really going on. I you
know, we need to be honest about what
these government people do left and right all
the time.
Dave DeCamp.
Here's Trump's post.
Military forces conducted a connect strike against positively
identified, Trendyaragu, narcoterrorists.
Otherwise, just people that sell drugs. You know?
Narcocarism
makes it feel more official.
In the SOUTHCOM area, Tender Tenderago is a
designated foreign terrorist organization. No. I mean, yeah.
That's see, that's how broken this has gotten.
So they could just declare a group they
don't like, that they wanna use to justify
what's happening in their immigration policy as an
insurrection, invasion, and however they wanna muddly break
that down. And now they just go on
calling it a terrorist organization, so therefore they
can bomb them without any due process. You
know, it's just this
rampant lovelessness.
Now yeah. The wrong term, by the way.
Just in process is what I really meant
to say. Like, just the idea that you
can just execute these people without ever verifying
your claims are true in international waters where
your laws don't apply. That's that's piracy, guys.
It's what it is.
The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed. No
US forces were harmed already read most of
it. Dave DeCamp.
Trump claims that the strike targeted members of
the Venezuelan gang, Trende Aragua. He also claims
the gang is, quote, under the control of
Nicholas Nicholas Maduro.
But that contradicts a declassified US intelligence memo
that says Maduro's government doesn't control tender ten
Trende Aragua, which is the truth. We made
this point back when he got exposed, like,
in the beginning of the whole thing with
Venezuela and El Salvador. Remember? Remember what the
claim was? Maduro refused to let the he
they lied about that. He came out and
said that's not true. And it came out
very clearly in the overlapping report information that
he did not control Trans De Aragua and
that the US government acknowledged that.
That the whole lie blew up in their
face.
They don't care because mindless partisan followers don't
need facts to back up their mindless partisan
followee,
the person they're following.
Anyway, very, very ridiculous that this is even
being, you know, again, even if they were
what they claimed, this should be this should
be outrageous.
Adam, not familiar,
Isaacson says lethal force against a civilian vessel
in international waters is a crime, a war
crime, if not in self defense. So even
if it was trafficking drugs, this this is
my point from before, which this video does
not show
what that they were being attacked. Only non
lethal actions like warning shots or disabling fire
are allowed.
Remember the path they would, you know, take
them down and then arrest them and seize
the drugs? Nope. Now we'll never even know
whether they were lying about it or not,
which is probably the point. He says, being
suspected of carrying drugs doesn't carry a death
sentence,
but it did today.
How do we know that's what happened? How
do we know that's not some asset that
Israel wanna take it out? You know what
I mean? We don't know because they would
do that and lie to you about it.
We all know that.
Now, lastly, I want you to see this.
Greg Stoker,
a veteran,
is joining, and I think he's already on
a Freedom Flotilla.
And apparently, if I if I re read
it correctly, it's all veterans. At the very
least, he is, and I think it's being
hard it's it's been called out by Israel
already.
I'm curious to see how this goes. Either
way, they have every right, like everybody else
does in this context, to bring food to
an area they tell you is totally not
in an open air prison. Right? But they
won't
as they starve them. That's that this this
has been going on for so long. The
Freedom Flotilla Coalition is about bringing food. That's
what they're doing.
Now the it's Greg's leading in all all
that it's right there. All veterans ship to
break the genocidal siege of Gaza. Here's what
he says, and then we'll finish with a
couple of the points that I think are
well, I should show you this one first.
Greg posted this. This would mean
oh, Ben Gavir
pushes for
look at that.
Terrorist level detention
of Gaza bound flotilla activists.
Right. So Ben Gavir is saying they're terrorists.
Why? So he can treat them like terrorists.
Funny. Look. They all play from the same
playbook, it seems.
And he says this would mean kidnapping US
veterans on a humanitarian mission, enshrined in international
law, they really don't care, and placing them
in a terror dungeon. I will remind the
minister that he's the only person in this
conversation who was convicted of terrorism.
Well done.
That that's only gonna make him, I more
angry. And and the evidence of the fact
that your government won't care about you is
that somebody like Joe Meters,
who was a veteran,
who was literally on The US's liberty.
You could watch it for yourself. It's only
thirty seconds. It was the video that they
all make before they go, knowing they're likely
gonna get taken by Israel that says, if
you're seeing this, I've been taken by Israel.
What happened?
And he he talks about being a veteran
for The US's liberty or on The US's
liberty. And, you know, you can watch other
videos where he openly discusses how he knows
Israel did that, and he knows The US
covered it up. They took him in prison
and held him for a really long time.
I forget. I think it was, like, a
month or something, and the US government didn't
say a word.
It's just disgusting. It really is disgusting. Your
government doesn't care about you, especially when you
bump up against Israel.
So here's the clip from Greg.
Kills himself every fifteen minutes in The United
States. You know, holdover from a war that
we didn't need, had no business being in.
And one of the reasons I'm on this
flotilla is because a lot of people
see, you know, Palestine or what happens in
The Middle East, conflicts in The Middle East
as just that's what happens over there with
those people, you know, what what can I
do about it? Right?
You know, because of the twenty years of
the global war on terror,
people have been normalized. Like, be having military
engagements
in West Asia is just kind of what
happens. And and how does it affect them?
So I'm on this flotilla,
to use my status as a veteran to
to say, like, hey. Whatever violence we do
overseas, whatever forms of repression,
and colonialism
immediately
get implemented back in The States. The same
technology used to enforce occupation
and apartheid through AI targeting programs. We just
talked about this with ICE. All of the
major tools they're currently using in the technological
direction have first been tested in Gaza, and
they're now being used on you. I'm pretty
sure you can piece together that obvious connection
that that whatever they're doing there will come
next to you. And that's not like an
absolute every time or everything. The point is
that that's what the current funnel looks like.
That it's building there, they're testing it there,
and it's being rolled out in front of
you here for the same kind of control
over your life.
Spyware,
mass drone warfare is coming to a look
is actually already at a local police department
near you. So if we accept the premise
that there's a fascist takeover happening in Washington
DC and extending out through the entire Continental
United States,
it started over here. It started with, you
know, the expansion of the police state after
09/11 and the national security state after nine
eleven, and it's only getting worse. And people
need to understand
that whatever our government
is willing to do to Palestinians,
they're willing to do to you. They just
can't do it yet.
Sadly, well put.
So, again,
he
is on this flotilla, and at some point,
it's going to, I mean, almost guaranteed to
be a take taken by Israel like everyone
has in the past.
Now it's it's, up in the air what
will actually happen.
Whether or not they'll be stupid enough to
do something serious,
it is that they are veterans. So, I
mean, look, if by legal right, they have
the ability to defend themselves if they're being
boarded as piracy,
but I doubt they'll take it to that
level because I don't think the Freedom Coalition
wants that. Right? Like, they it's but we'll
see. I I mean, I hope that nothing
happens because
it's there seems to be zero accountability for
this government even when they're attacking Americans, which
I'm hoping the America first people out there
can start to recognize.
But
we will end.
We saw Joe Meaders. Right? These are all
Americans. We just saw others taken, same point.
With yet again, the reiteration of the reality
that as of right this moment, an American
citizen, a child,
is still in Israeli prison
because he went to go visit his family
in West Bank
and is taken and is now in prison,
has lost 20 pounds, has scabies.
I haven't heard a single word from your
US government. They'll stand up and scream about
an Israeli American that has a problem over
anywhere else, but not an American citizen who
is literally in Israeli prison. Or, you know,
cons or the overlap that we made before.
An Israeli government entity can go over to
rape children in in The United States. They'll
let him freely walk away. And an American
gets goes to visit his family. Israel locks
him up in prison. They don't say a
word. You know, the tale of two stories
here, guys. The tale of two citizenships
recognize what's happening
as they roll these things out, as Trump
floats the idea of going after Americans, as
they undermine constitutional realities
everywhere.
It's not hard to see what's happening. I
mean, Greg made a really good point there
about how this all builds together. Right? Whether
it's the constitutional removal, you know, undermining
as the building out of the AI infrastructure,
the surveillance.
Right? The the different moves of the rolling
out of the police state. I mean, all
these things are being incrementally done to roll
this out in one idea. It's not hard
to see. And as it builds there, it's
building back here.
So I'll leave you with that.
Thank you for tuning in today.
I just really hope people continue to find
the courage, dig down deep
to do what you know is right. I
know it can be tough, especially if you're,
you know,
absorbed into some partisan
circle.
But I'd like to believe you care about
the truth, like a lot of the pretend
media out there likes to claim, then you
more so than you do about your team.
I mean, I don't know. In what world,
you could be watching what's going on and
still pretending like that's more important, but maybe
that's just me. But thank you for being
here today. Thank you for continuing to fight.
Stand up for what you believe in.
This platform is always under attack, so the
more support you can send, the more we'll
continue to put out content.
Continue to put out more. And like we
said, by the way, there's more articles gonna
be coming this month, more content put out.
We're pushing back as always.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all as always.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. We have to condemn the atrocities
that happen every day to Palestinians in the
West
Bank. You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,
drew our attention at the state department to
to the sexual assault, actually the rape of
a 13 year old boy that occurred in
an Israeli prison in Muscovyya in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, the government
of Israel. And you know what happened the
next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, not sexual atrocity, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much
dehumidification
where people