At least in my opinion, I think where
the powers that be, however you wanna define
that,
are taking people is essentially leading us to
some sort of two tier society where there
is really no need for a middle class,
and it's really more accurate accurately described as
like a neofeudal,
style society
where you have a large underclass managed by
sort of this more elite group,
that would do the managing. And I think
it really falls under,
what some people have referred to as technocracy,
sort of this idea of more of, like,
a scientific,
dictatorship.
And there's actually this prominent,
figure from the Club of Rome named Dennis
Meadows. The Club of Rome is, an entity
that and it has a very intertwined entity
with groups that have become infamous
over the past several years, like the World
Economic Forum, for example.
But Dennis Meadows essentially said something to the
effect that, you know, for the good of
people and the planet and the economy, and
in his words,
that it was gonna be necessary to either
reduce the world's population so that people could
have freedom
and use resources the way they want, or
that, there would have to be a scientific
tater dictatorship,
imposed on 8,000,000,000 or 7,000,000,000 people in order
to to ensure,
accurate allocation of resources and all of this
stuff by
educated technocratic
scientific elite.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 08/29/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Some really interesting developments around the mRNA conversation
that I wanna start out with today that
I found
pretty shocking, to be honest, that
Kellyanne Leavitt just basically publicly discussed openly what
we've been telling everybody what's going on.
It's just an interesting development in general to
see her come out and say point blank
what they have been, like, denying what the
entire mag movement's pushing back on. But, of
course, this is a much smaller story, in
the context and the way people view everything
going on today around
the shooting that took place. Now what's interesting
around this and sad story, people you know,
anything like this where people are being shot
is not something you should dismiss, play take
lightly,
but also
never in any case should you feel obligated
to not ask questions. Should should you ever
feel that it's inappropriate
to investigate,
to question what the police say, to look
at the information that's in front of you
and ask yourself whether the government could be
lying about something, could be manipulating something, could
have entirely faked the entire thing. Oh my
gosh. We're not allowed to say the I
mean, obviously, historically, these are things the government
have done. That's a fact.
But as as always with situations like this,
it's never, you know, I always argue
from my perspective, my opinion, that decorum is
important,
especially when you don't really know for sure
when you're investigating something
And to come at it hard as if
you know for a fact it didn't happen,
let's say, even though you don't know that
for sure, is pretty
disrespectful
to somebody who may have actually died if
that happened. My point is just to come
at this responsibly
and investigate,
call things out if you think that's the
case. Don't shy away from saying something you
think others would you know, if you think
the facts back it up. Now what's interesting
to me, I'm not even really gonna go
through the story of the shooting like maybe
I have in the past. I mean, I
am in many ways, but
as I think everyone's already noticing,
this story is clearly about something much more.
Like, many of the ones we've seen over
the last so many years have been.
I mean, undeniable
manipulation
in regard to so many of these events
we've talked about, like
and any but just unparalleled
overlaps
to the one today with the same writing
and the same way on the guns. It
just there's something very obviously off about all
of this. Whether you could even take it
and make it about, as RFK seems to
be focusing on, the antidepressants and the drugs
they're taking. How long have we been making
that case? But that's one part of a
larger story. Take MK Ultra, for example.
Very much believe so, and I think the
facts back up the reality that that's not
something that ever went away.
But are these things involved? Is that playing
a factor? Are all of them included?
The bigger picture I think people are picking
up on is one that it does seem
like there's something off around a lot of
this. But the
so, you know, the solution as we're the
problem, the reaction, the solution that is being
presented for
this problem.
Now what you know, whether or not you
believe it's being manufactured,
manipulated, used, which I do in many ways
in different parts depending on what story we're
talking about, very much so.
But I think it's obvious that that solution
is being used, and I think that's the
real story today. And I think it's even
more interesting that you find a lot of
the, you know, mainstream alternative media types out
there that seem to be really damn doing
their damndest to make this about one part
of an all of government problem. Whether they
know that's only gonna allow it to continue
or not is irrelevant to me right now.
It's about trying to highlight what I think
we've always been calling, what is clearly coming,
which it's not just about who called this
or not. I think anybody with a brain
has seen this coming,
has seen the development left and right of
the different moments that have brought us to
this point. And I think it's very important
to discuss the idea of precrime, of AI
control structures, of Israel involvement, of all the
things that we've been talking about. But, of
course, yes, we and we shouldn't, and we
should care about the different parts of the
story that may not you know, that like,
let's say, for example, there are claims of,
you know, like, lies about what happened or,
you know, questions about who was really there.
Like, these are things we should very much
be asking, but we should prove these things.
So, we'll go through this today on the
on the first part being the real focus.
And as that story develops, obviously, we're gonna
care about that if there's something that is
reportable, something factual that shows, you know, the
police lied or the government made something up
or this person's connected to a large entity
that was involved in some way. Not even
to say that that's the case. I'm just
saying these are obviously things we should not
shy away from. And I'm repeating that for
a reason. It's clear that there's so many
today who either go way too far in
the partisan side of it and just assume
into the wind about everything they think will
get you know, which is interesting to a
lot of people just to talk about the
lot, but never know they aren't proving that,
but then,
you know, lurch in that direction, or the
people that are saying you shouldn't ask questions
at all and act like it's in you
know, it's not that conspiracies are all fake
and, you know, both of those people are
the same ridiculous
in different ways. I think that's important to
point out.
But we'll go over that today, the the
shooting in general, but the bigger picture around
it and a few other developing
points around the technology that I think is
really relevant.
And depending on time, a couple more points
that I think are, you know, important to
include. We'll be likely doing a show tomorrow
that I wanna build on from this one
into some of the technology
that I was already looking into that just
seems really interesting in this conversation about, like,
an AI precrime,
you know, beyond just precrime and artificial intelligence,
but the invasiveness of the Gideon program and
the rest of the things we've talked about.
And it
you can't decouple these things from the bigger
picture we've talked about. You just can't. And
it gets way more alarming the more you
look at how this plays out, especially with
the people involved and what they've been doing
with this stuff, not just the genocide, but
everything else we're talking about. And having that
kind of influence in this country, there's a
lot there's a lot to get into. But
we're gonna start with the health part of
this. Now when there's one part about Ghislaine
Maxwell that I want to include that is
important just to you to see that goes
off a story we recently talked about, but
let's start with the
health conversation.
Because if this is getting, you know I
mean, it's probably why it's being pointed at
right now, getting a lot less attention. And
it should and it's a very important story.
If you know, arguably, depending on what you're
focusing on, I would say just of a
shooting, this is a bigger story.
Yes. People died. That is a sad story,
and it's obviously news. It matters. But this
is a much bigger point of many, many,
many people have died and continue to from
the shots. They're still pushing.
But the bigger point about how that is
being used and what it connects to, you
know, that's that's a monumental story as well.
But this, as we already talked about and
this was on the,
get the closer shot, the '20 the tenth,
08/10/2025.
Trump admin leans into self amplifying mRNA,
SAM RNA,
or and sometimes it's just SARNA, they both
being the same thing, under guise of ending
mRNA. And then we touch on the RNA
in food, which is also not stopping, or
our mRNA in every other category besides the
vaccines, which, by the way, aren't actually stopping,
Like we were telling you in this episode
and the one before it, in fact. And
so we got a lot of pushback, rightly
so, from the people that, you know, wanna
defend their guy. I shouldn't say rightly so,
but in their minds, you know, we're gonna
defend Trump no matter what. Same thing they
do on the left. The point, though, is
that it was very clear, as we've been
showing you. It was not a secret. The
document of the HHS post literally said this,
and yet it still got either, you know,
people that shared it without even caring to
look and just repeated something, which is what
most of the mainstream media and alternative do
in mainstream alternative media,
or they lied to you. So the reality
was they were not just continuing
some of the mRNA shots. They were leaning
heavily into the self amplifying versions of it,
as well as the other parts they didn't
stop, as well as the mRNA food and
everything else they're using it for. So watch
this show if you wanna find out that.
And and, you know, to a degree, this
is demonstrating our value. I want you to
see that we were saying this not because
we were guessing or getting it right before,
but the information was there. It's like during
COVID,
the lie around it all. We didn't just
guess. We looked and said, look at what
it says right here on the study that
they put out that people are denying. And
then it took years for average, you know,
the real journalist to jump in and say
it later and, you know, get one point
to it then. The point was that we
looked and it was there. Same thing now.
And I'll show you some of this. Now
we'll start with the the clip that everyone's
recognizing.
Now this is my point about the, you
know, the way that most of this field
operates. I don't mean, you know, most
there are a lot of people in the
independent media field and large large most of
that is the main stream alternative media to
say a majority of that is not even
you know, there's a huge amount of people
doing excellent work in this field is what
I'm trying to make clear. But there's far
more of them doing horrible, manipulative, lie, lazy.
You know, so much of that clouds this
field. And so my point is this comes
around
and and just this is somebody that clipped
it well so you could actually see that
it was from the the recent it's not
some old clip where Kelly and Leavitt admits
that not only did they, you know, like
it was a mistake
that we didn't end these because of the,
you know, emergency authorization when, you know, like,
we were trying to stop mRNA. No. That's
nonsense. We were going hard in the direction.
Admits that four new ones have been,
leaned into, and these aren't new new. These
are the ones we've been pointing to. The
self amplifying and the others, these are from
May and and afterward.
But people who just saw this clip,
some of them I'll point to, responded as
if breaking news, Trump just
leaned into four new shots, which is frustrating.
One, because people then think this is some
new development and don't recognize that me and
plenty of others have been trying to get
attention to this before that, but also then,
you know,
manipulate the reality of the situation as if
this is some you know, I think it's
important to understand the way that it went
down. To first listen to this and recognize
that this is the story we've been telling
you the entire time and that this is
something that is now kind of being dripped
out amongst a lot of other things. And
I actually think that's on purpose, which, you
know, I think we tend to agree on
that. From,
miscommunications
or differences on vaccine policy. So I wonder
if you could just say whether or not
the president believes that the COVID vaccine should
be available to and covered by insurance
for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting
conditions.
What I will tell you is that the
FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for
three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four
new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five
and twenty twenty six formulas.
The the re Okay. Right. That right there,
the formulas is talking it's talking about the
new direction.
Right? That's that's the self amplifying or or
at the very or if as you know,
if there there's some other that I'm not
seeing, at the very least means a COVID
nineteen with a new one not based on
the old variants or whatever. Either way
either way, that is not what all of
the corporate all the MAGA supporters, Maha, who
are still lying to themselves, were screaming about
them ending mRNA. Just like they said, they
ended gain of function. Neither of those happened.
In fact, the opposite happened. Very clearly, if
you even read the HHS post for either.
So it's this is important to understand that
they didn't stop this even in the slightest,
and they played, like, okay, the $500,000,000
point. Right?
He canceled 22 contract. Can somebody show me
these 22 contracts? Can somebody point to me
which ones were canceled? And I'm not talking
about the ones from before that there seem
to be listing as if they I think
a five I think we saw a $500,000,000
bait and switch. Because let's not forget the
$500,000,000
win into their new platform. So all they
really did, which by the way, he told
you was going to make COVID nineteen shots.
He said that very clearly. So they just
simply move that money. I mean, it's it's
not even really those were earmarked for COVID
shots, the $500,000,000
So all they really did was just shift
the direction
to one they were doing in the same
direction, in fact, which is just it's so
brazen. It's just so belligerently lie about this.
And the point is on top of that,
that they played the stopping of the emergency
use authorization as if they somehow were the
ones canceling these. So they use the ones
that were like, remember when we told you
before this? It's kinda connecting multiple stories here.
And we told you back when the the
Biden administration
kinda when it carried over into the kind
of post COVID nineteen mania, which is still
happening, and they we told you, look. They're
not stopping the emergency use authorization even though
the time is up. They just carried it
over. Remember that?
Very clearly continued, and that's why they kept
giving them under emergency use authorization even though
the emergency was over. So all they really
did was keep doing that. Well, in the
Trump's administration until recently decided to say, we're
gonna cancel even though the legally
the legal reality was they should have done
it a long time ago. And use that
to claim like they were stopping them even
though that was already supposed to happen. But
then clearly, now what the cat out of
the bag that they have also continued other
shots? I mean, this is not a small
point. Not only are they deliberately deceiving their
people that believe in them, which is just
such a you should feel so betrayed
of all these points, but they're just clearly
going forward with the worst version of this.
The thing that they all told you was
hurting people, except Trump, who still says it
was the best thing ever, and and making
it worse, self amplifying, which I still maintain
was what that first one was to begin
with, as it said in the first Pfizer
documents. But either way, it is what we're
talking about, self amplifying. It continues to produce
the antigen. That's what this one was doing.
So I just think this is insane
how obvious it is. And, again, getting a
little bit the revocation of that emergency youth
authorization is because, obviously, the COVID pandemic and
the public health emergency is over. But just
to correct the record because there's been a
lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision
does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines
for Americans who want them. We believe in
individual choice. That's a promise that the president
and the secretary have made. Right. Right. Because
all they they believe in choice when it's
allowing you to take something that might kill
you. Right? But over here, you can't say
that. You can't write that. You can't believe
that because what you know, that's not even
just Israel, by the way. You could fit
that into 14 of the things about the
right just like you can to the left.
But here, we care about your freedom of
choice.
Just so stupid. Like, I just saw the
Department of Homeland Security talk about defending your
right to religion, except here are 14 of
them telling you how Muslims wanna kill everybody
or how if you're Muslim, you're you're bad
or that the the all of that religion
hates us. Trump has said that. But, yeah,
they care about protecting your religion except this
one, except that one. Not in Iran, though.
It's just they're such hypocrites. And if we're
honest with ourselves, it's not hard to see.
But this is why I think it's a
dwindling number of people who are so dishonest
that they're willing to ignore
everything to stay on their team sport politics.
So here,
this is Lisa Christine says Trump just authorized
four new shots. Again, which isn't actually what
happened. Even if you listen to her, she
says that they weren't just authorized. She's just
reiterating that they had been around this transition
point when they claimed they were stopping the
other ones.
But still good people pointing it out. But
just on a on a kind of surface
level note there, just recognize how much of
the conversation is reactive to whatever they put
in front of you. And I don't even
mean in a dishonest way. People don't know.
They see it. They respond. But when you're
a journalist out there, when you're a reporter
out there, it's your responsibility
to do better. I'm not talking about her
necessarily. I'm just saying anybody out there who
is in this field. Right? And so, ultimately,
I think it's important to highlight somebody like
this, wherever I put that.
Stu Peters. Well, you know my opinion about
him. I think he's kind of grifting as
a journalist trying to, you know, ambulate what
people who are really doing this are out
there doing. He says, Trump just authorized four
new COVID vaccines. Same point. And I said,
no. He did not just do that. One
who one,
one only thinks that if they are simply
reacting to what the White House just said
and or whatever is swirling on Twitter. The
TLAB audience knew about this for weeks
because we simply looked.
I think that's important.
So Sasha Ladipova
calling this out. Same point. Here's the chief
nerd. Breaking.
The FDA just rescinded the emergency use authorization
for for COVID vaccines.
But that's I mean, so here's what's so
crazy to me. Not only is that clearly
not even accurate, you were you rescinded the
shots
that were under the use authorization,
and they're just simply creating more COVID shots.
Now I haven't even gone in deep around
what mechanism through which they're you know? Well,
I guess the difference is they're not forcing
it, not necessarily right now, and they're not
they're not rushing it out even though if
you really look, the time frame
through which they're making these things are not
four years long, so they're doing the same
thing.
It's AI. It's the same point. So I
think this is a very clear partisan sort
of like, you know, the bottom line is
they're still going forward with COVID shots, both
mRNA
and and well, mRNA and self amplifying mRNA
very clearly. And she simply says false. They
approved
new versions of mRNA shots, including for children.
You see the clear difference? So if you
report this as, hey. They stopped it. They
ended the use. They stopped COVID shots. I
mean, that's that is not just
slightly inaccurate. That's 100%
the opposite of what's happening. Like most of
what's happening, and Sasha Lapova has done a
great job calling this out. Now on top
of that and there's plenty more we could
go into. If you want a deeper conversation
about this, watch the show I just pointed
to before. Because this was just updating you
on the fact that it's, you know, this
is what we told you before, and it's
only just now being recognized by plenty of
people. But on top of this, guess what?
This is on the twenty sixth. Right? The
twenty ninth today. Trump met Bill Gates at
the White House on Tuesday.
So what is it? The second or the
third time he's met with the person you
wanted to be in prison since he got
into the second time in in White House.
US president Donald Trump met with Microsoft CEO.
Microsoft important, by the way, because he is
still the CEO, and it is coming out
left and right how it's basically. And I
only say basically to be objective because
basically an Israeli operation. I mean, and it's
not that hard to see. Even WikiLeaks just
called out their Azure program and the unit
8,200 groups that are just I mean, there's
a whole thing going around about how they're
literally just hiring direct it's a different story.
The point and it actually relates to what
we're gonna get into in a minute. But
my point is to recognize how this infiltration
is damn near everywhere and all seems to
relate back to the few things we're talking
about, whether it's the invasive health direction or
the invasive AI direction through government. Funny how
those things connect.
And it says and in, on t met,
on Tuesday of this week, citing a senior
White House official. It's not immediately clear what
they discussed. So remember, last time, he was
super excited. We just played that for you
about the direction of the vaccines that Trump
discussed.
Here we are. You can't really just you
you can't pretend this isn't happening. He met
with Bill Gates. They were excited about the
vaccines. They're still doing the vaccines, and they're
going in the direction of self amplifying, which
is what Bill Gates has said was the
next step. Here we are. So and so
if you're gonna pretend like Gates is not
advising Donald Trump on the direction, or you're
gonna pretend like they didn't go speak at
World Economic Forum at his beginning of the
administration, or if you're gonna pretend that Larry
Fink is not an inner part of his
circle, BlackRock, all the things that you're calling
out everywhere else, then you're simply lying to
yourself. This is the problem. It's in front
of you. And I'm not saying it's more
or less than the other side of the
paradigm. In my opinion, it's it's all the
same thing. They are part of that problem,
the government.
But if we keep pretending like you're I
mean, if you keep pretending like it's not
all one thing and it's two sides, then
you're gonna be lost. But even more so
if you keep denying the obviousness of what's
in front of you, that's just a that's
just a choice, guys. It's a choice.
Here's what Bill Gates recently said, just to
show you that this is the direction, and
he's all excited about it. Second time he's
met with Trump.
We'll have new vaccines. We'll have a,
TB vaccine,
malaria vaccine, HIV vaccine. And even the things
like COVID vaccines,
we need to make them have longer duration,
more coverage,
and we're gonna change instead of using needle
to use a little patch. See this?
So how in the world can you rectify
this? The idea of them telling you these
things are let's just say RFK. Only one
who's been truly honest about it until now
in the administration
and told you they're killing everybody because they
are, that they shouldn't be on the market
because they shouldn't,
along with a lot of other, by the
way, that we're not even getting into.
And he's the one telling you longer,
faster,
you know, quick quicker delivery.
Is that what everybody voted for? Is that
the mandate that you're talking about?
Gotta be honest about this because that's what's
happening, and he's all about it. It's not
that there's no disconnect here. It's what they're
doing.
So the pandemic really highlighted that we've been
underinvested
in those innovations, and they you know, our
partners in India
are are part of how we're gonna,
get these breakthrough products done. Right. Because they
seem to dump them in people in India
to see what goes wrong first. Kind of
half joking, but that's happened so many times.
I can't even believe India still allows this
guy to do anything with their population, whether
that's giving them oral oral polio vaccines, which
caused an outbreak, getting them GMO food, which
destroys their food supply, you know, but let's
keep trying it out on them. Clearly, there's
a issue with the government as usual.
So I'll include these again. These are just
some of the ones that I can prove
to you. They're right in front of us.
The and
and Amplitude Therapeutics are the ones he personally
by name mentioned we're going to continue, and
they've got multiple shots, most of them self
amplifying. This is a self amplifying bird flu
shot, self amplifying COVID nineteen shot. All these
he he explicitly pointed to these. They are
still continuing. Here's Here's one I found that's
an AI enhanced self amplifying mRNA vaccine to
set set to combat one of the deadliest
known viruses. These are all in the works.
It's happening.
Here's the one I've added to this, by
the way, which I this is my opinion,
but I think this is where it's all
going. And, honestly, my gut tells me this
is what's in some way gonna overlap with
the larger project they're working on. Whether it
somehow finds its way into the platform, which
we haven't even seen really roll out. All
we've heard is talk about it. So once
we have something to actually prove or look
into, I get the sense it might not
be what we thought. Like, the point being,
he mentioned a lot about the whole cell
vaccines,
you know, which I have plenty of concerns
about generally anyway. So did he before he
got here. But I get the sense it's
gonna go some other direction. This is from
June 2025. Transemplifying
mRNA vaccine expression consensus spike elicits broad neutralization
specifically against COVID nineteen variants.
This is the direction, and this is just
the it's the expansion of the same thing.
Now Sasha Latapova adds to this. Court testimony
from the CDC and BARDA in Utah, doctor
Kirk Moore's case reveals the truth. One, CBRN
weapons pathway was used to push mRNA as
vaccines.
We've talked about all of these points, by
the way. Some with Taylor interviewed Sasha Latypova
as well as plenty of others. Some of
the best interviews I've seen around the COVID
topic have been with Taylor on the last
American vagabond, including Arna Burkhart,
which since I mentioned, I might as well
grab it. Seriously, one of the most
important interviews in this conversation, and that's I
mean, pretty much it asked I mean, this
is roundly discussed amongst people in this conversation,
and it's one of the most suppressed in
the conversation. And I think you know why.
It is shockingly important.
It you know, I'll leave it there. There's
so much. This is just such an important
article and story and interview that we put
a lot of time and a lot of
money into. Filmed four k, multiple cameras, center
there, you know, the whole thing. And it's
not why we did it. I mean, it's
not like I expect some monetary return. It's
about just getting the work done, that it's
out there forever. And I know that this
work alone saved lives. Just getting in front
of certain people, I've been told that by
families.
This is important stuff, but it still got
suppressed.
And many of the people that don't wanna
hear it, people that are pretending they're fighting
against these things.
COVID response is an ongoing military campaign, which
Trump just barely alluded to, but it's not
a secret. We've a lot of us have
been calling this out. Sasha, lot lot more
than most. It's always been a military operation.
Operation Warp Speed. Guy, it's not hard to
see. Mansef Salawi right in the beginning. Right?
All these points we connected way back in
2020. Health care system is used as an
unknowing army to attack the society.
Interesting. Those who refused COVID protocols and shots
were deemed as enemy combatants under military framework.
What do you think is happening right now,
guys?
Pam Bondi dropped the case because the United
States government cannot afford this disclosure.
Long thread. You can read. It goes on
all those points. I think that's very important.
Of course, she did. Right? The the the
rebels fighting the deep state covered up for
the deep state because that makes sense. Right?
Or you recognize they're all part of the
same thing, covering up for the same thing.
Jason Basler, adding this one two last points
to this health overlap,
which, by the way, interestingly, dovetails right into
the next part of the conversation, both because
of
precrime, AI, Palantir, Israel, pretty much all of
it right in one spot. They just made
Peter Thiel loyalist, Jim O'Neil, CDC director. Oh,
there I was gonna grab that. I forgot.
Not that I'm gonna take too much time
because I know what they are,
but I wanted to get this in the
show notes for you because both of these
articles are very important for this exact point.
This just adds to the same conversation.
So here's yet another Peter Thiel acolyte. I'm
I I gotta be honest. I mean, I'm
always honest about these things, but I gotta
be very blunt about this in regard to
teal. You compare this to like, okay. Obama
and the Citibank point is always a good
one to make because it was really ridiculous
and obvious.
So
I've never seen this like, the amount of
people connected to this one man, let alone
Palantir and the inner circle, Andreessen and, yeah,
and their philosophy, you know, the driven by
your Curtis Yarvin or the rest of them.
Right? Karp alongside him. There's a lot of
moving parts, but him in particular,
I I I borderline unprecedented, but that's only
probably because we don't really know the extent
to which it's always been there in past
administrations. I mean, we do know, but, like,
the extent to which I think this is
wild.
This is incredible. My point is it's only
one it's one more. So now the acting
CDC director is Jim O'Neil.
Ex Thiel Foundation director worked at,
Thiel's mythril myth nithril capital
embedded in Thiel's inner circle, pushed FDA reforms
echoing Thiel's agenda. As well as the fact
is I think he actually founded,
as, David Icke says, Peter Thiel associate Jim
O'Neil named by Trump and Kennedy as acting
director of the CDC,
cofounded the Thiel Fellowship in 2010, was CEO
of the Thiel Foundation and managed direct and
managing director of Metro Capital, which he cofounded
with Thiel.
None of these people are in the direction
of what we're talking about. They're all going
in the direction of AI drugs and everything
else that pretty much conservatives more than anybody
have been concerned about.
One more thing to call out.
He says, meet the new CDC brought to
you by Palantir.
No joke.
Now, of course, you got everybody in the
mainstream alternative media pointing to one thing, one
thing only, or one focal point instead of
the law. You know, none of them are
talking about Epstein anymore. None of them are
talking about any number of very clear important
points that they would have told you is
the world shattering story if Biden was in
power.
But now RFK Junior wants to focus on,
which I do think is an important point,
but we'll see whether it goes to the
right point,
the drugs that were being taken by the
person who did the shooting.
There never been a time in America, he
says, where people walk into a crowd or
a church or a movie theater or a
school and just start randomly shooting. Well, in
fact, that's just flatly wrong.
Just, I mean,
not hard to look. I mean, whether we
can look through, like, news documented things or
go well back before that, it's are we
really gonna pretend that it's I mean, let's
just say I'm I'm willing to easily argue
that it's way worse today.
Obvious reasons, those included. Antidepressants,
all sorts of androgen disrupting chemicals, all sorts
of things that throw your body out of
whack, glyphosate, dioxins.
Now, individually, those things wouldn't cause something like
that, but in all together,
we've talked about this, the the synergistic in
a negative way connection between glyphosate
and the COVID nineteen shots, the endocrine disrupting
chemicals, and in particular,
the things like the the,
SSRIs,
antidepressants, and plenty of others, antipsychotics,
the amount of drugs they're giving to children
under the year of five years old. I
I've looked at that so many times over
the years. Look at the amount of drugs,
like, even antipsychotics
they're giving to under one year old kids
for whatever reason. It's insane.
So important.
But if, like, the art RNA conversation, it's
this bad and then goes in a direction
that doesn't really solve it or goes in
the direction of some kind of AI therapy
or some which is what I sense. They've
done it every other time so far. I
certainly hope not. I always hope tomorrow he'll
bring it all back and prove that we
were wrong for doubting him. But right now,
it's not looking good.
Anyway, my point is this is where he's
focusing on the drug just direction,
And I think it's important, but let's realize
the bigger point.
Immediately,
Melania Trump, of all people, comes out screaming
about precrime.
And we have this weird overlap with the
Gideon program and these
posts that were made on his own YouTube
before it got here talking about the next
false flag and all sorts of weird things.
All it comes down to, in my opinion,
is that they're literally using this even if
it was a genuine thing they're now using.
Never never let a good crisis go to
waste to roll out the pre crime direction
that we have always been warning about. So
before we go there,
I wanna go over a couple more points.
I only just put this at the end
of this to connect with the RFK Jr.
Point and to see that that's where people
seem to be trying to make this about
the health overlap,
which is important.
We'll come back to that.
Oh, I can only grab this one too.
For the podcast, I'll include both these articles.
Derek did. Very well done.
Both about the overlapping circle of Peter Thiel.
Meet the Peter Thiel acolytes in Donald Trump's
second administration. And, of course
technocrats.
His name is Curtis Yarvin. This all really
comes back to that that, you know, the
deny all you know, like, the many different
points we can see. The deny, lie, and
never apologize, court system, whatever, or the idea
of, you know, if I'm saving the country,
there is I'm not breaking any law, the
Napoleon Machiavellian point. I mean, it all comes
from this kind of idea, right, where it's
oligarchs to rule, to keep you safe from
the other bad oligarchs. Like, all these I
think it's ridiculous. I think some of them
truly believe this nonsense that they are somehow
the good dictators or however you wanna frame
this ridiculous thing. But,
honestly, the truth of it is, I think
at the end of the day, none of
these people even care. It's about power.
But we'll come back to that. Quick points
about some overlapping things really. Both these points
we're gonna go into right now are about
the it's kind of the same idea. Sorter
and the rest pointing to RFK June. You're
talking about the antidepressants
making it about, you know, the one side.
It's always about something, you know, some Sorel's
point, which is not irrelevant, or the idea
of just about left. It's one-sided thing. Or
the the trans problem or all the which
is clearly involved as this is a man
who turned himself into a woman, if you
wanna call it that way. And that is
what we're talking about. But those things are
relevant parts of the story. But if it
all amounts to the one end goal they're
trying to create, then maybe we're missing the
forest for the trees here by focusing on
yet another,
like, shockingly set up story. Like, the way
that this comes out I mean, look. Whether
this person is aware of being involved in
something like that, the way that we have
this identical story with the manifesto and the
guns with the white writing and over and
over and over, that is just, yes, there
is a thing like social contagion and
but even that, in and of itself, is
sort of manufactured through the algorithmic manipulation. You
know, there's something to this that's very clearly
not organic.
Well, that's that's just undeniable to me.
But, like, I guess my my first instinct
when I looked at the story was like,
why am I gonna dive through yet another,
like, organized story by some intelligence operation? You
know, why like, either Butler or anything else.
Like, you go through these stories and it
never ends where there's any, like, real resolution.
There's always 16 different open ended points where
they just declare the narrative, and that that's
the mainstream alternative media now more than anything.
And we just march forward based on I'm
going ahead. My point is that all of
that is important, but the idea is clearly
there's a larger story that that is, like,
smacking everyone in the face. So before we
get to that, these are points where in
the in mainstream alternative media that are, you
know, kind of distractionary
pointing this way, that way. One of them
being the Maxwell overlap, but in an interesting
way, here's JD Vance stepping into the fold
saying that there is no Epstein client list.
All of them now. Just, it's a fake
thing. Epstein list didn't exist. And blamed Biden
for the scandal because it's totally Biden's fault
that you guys told us there'd be a
list that will be given. Like, that's really
stupid. Essentially, on top of the whole thing,
it's not a Biden hoax. It's not a
left or right hoax. It's obviously an all
of government problem, and that's kind of one
of the larger focuses of today.
And as Brian writes, they're rewriting the timeline,
gaslighting their own base and pretending the list
never existed.
Exactly. So So on that note quickly, an
update to the story, which I did think
was very interesting. Now we've talked about this
already.
This came out,
and I thought it was interesting because I
just shared this because I saw I saw
this report come out,
which it said Maxwell cleared to leave prison
and work on work release. And it there
clearly seemed to be some information to back
that up.
And just
shocking amount, like, 123 comments, most of them
going, that's not true. That's a lie. Partisan.
Partisan. Partisan.
Okay.
You know, interesting. I I mean, clearly, it
seemed to be an out an honest report
to me, but I hadn't seen any action
on it. So whether she actually the point
was for the podcast, Maxwell cleared to leave
prison on work release. I didn't know if
I said that already or not. And so
the point was clearly that that seemed to
be there,
but whether she was able to or they
were gonna let her, kind of a different
story. Right? So it became this kind of
nuance point where they let because that would
make them look really bad. Cheering this on
the deal and they just let the let
her let a human trafficker out on work
release because that makes sense. Right?
But then the story was that's not true.
It wasn't really work release. Okay.
I clearly, I that was the case, but
I don't I I thought maybe they weren't
gonna give it to her. Now I was
kind of that pause. So this adds to
that story. I just think it's funny to
follow-up on that weird response
that, you know, left and right of the
partisan side of this game are willing to
just scream foul against anything. They don't like
the narrative.
Maxwell and this is an interesting overlap. Maxwell's
audacious bid to get a job at cushy
lockup that would let her outside. Now the
point of this is that they turned that
down.
But the point overall is that she is
clearly able to do this. She was in
the running for it. They simply denied her
and gave it to somebody else. I think
it's a really telling point that, clearly, she
does have
an allowance to go outside should they give
her that ability or should she find a
job that required that. That's insane to me.
Maxwell is on the hunt for a job
after being rejected for a cushy new role
chauffeuring inmates in and out of prison, according
to exclusive reveal from Billy Mail. Maxwell recently
transferred to federal prison camp, Bryan,
where felons can apply for coveted town driver
positions,
ferrying their fellow cons
to medical appointments and bus stops in airports.
But her application was quietly tossed out after
camp authorities determined that she, the 63 year
old sex offender, was too much of a
flight risk to be allowed out unsupervised.
I mean, you can clearly get the sense
here, guys, that there's is an allowance that
should
so the fact that we've worked to a
point to where the one of the most
prolific human trafficking characters that they were all
telling us was gonna bring down the the
left and now Trump made a deal with
her, gave her a proper agreement. She doesn't
have she won't get in trouble for what
she tells them. They let her into a
cushy prison, and I don't see much happening
anymore. No list has come out. Apparently, now
it's a hoax from the
Democrats. And that you know? And now you're
gonna let her be able to leave I
mean, this might as well just be the
continuation of their network
or could be if you're allowing this person
to be I mean, either way, this is
insulting to anybody, to the to the people
that were abused by her, that she allowed
to be abused, that they all told you
were gonna get
vindicated, grab justice,
but now they're calling you fake news for
pointing to what they said would happen.
The decision is said to have in full
infuriated Maxwell who's serving twenty years for pimping
young girls for her pedophile ex Jeffrey Epstein
who died behind bars in 2019, so we're
told.
They're typically awarded to a handful of trusted,
well behaved inmates who are close to release
and know their way around the area because
they previously lived there or have links to
the city. So it could very well just
be that she doesn't know the city, and
that's why they give it to somebody else.
But it says Maxwell's transfer days later to
Bryan, a far more relaxed facility typically for
nonviolent white collar criminals was seen as unprecedented
for somebody convicted of multiple counts of trafficking
of minors.
Her attorney,
David Oscar Marcus, insisted he it was done
on safety grounds, however,
not because of favoritism or any imminent prospect
of presidential pardon. Well, it's already happened. You've
already given the proffer agreement, which allowed her
to not be accountable for what she revealed,
if that's ever even shown to us, and
sent to
a club fed.
Pretty you know, even even if that's all
that happens, moving her to this place where
she's able to freely move around, which is
the case, and maybe leave on some job
release supervised
is not what a human trafficker should be
doing.
She's able to move relevant relatively freely around
the camp, says the article, sleeps in dormitory
style accommodations in b one unit, one of
four housing blocks, and fraternizes with a small
handful of inmates that she met at Jewish
prayer services, sources tell us.
Canine Companions, which places puppies in federal prisons
for inmates to groom, exercise, and train as
service dogs, has already said it will not
allow Maxwell to interact with the seven animals
currently on-site. Quote, we do not allow anyone
who has committed crimes against animals or minors
because she has.
That's because they're vulnerable populations. So even this
animal business is unwilling to let their dogs
be around her because she's a
human trafficking
sexual predator that has manipulated minors.
But we're okay letting her get off, go
with news you know, in a club fed
because they wanna stop what she knows from
coming out or however you wanna read that
situation.
Maxwell said president here, here, she's out running
around. Maxwell said president Bill Clinton absolutely never
went to the financier's private Caribbean island and
claimed the notorious photo of prince Andrew with
the late Epstein accuser, Guthrie, was fake.
She also offered that Trump was innocent.
Respects, that he has a gentleman in all
respects.
Okay. So as I said on Twitter the
other day, so that means that if you
are using, as Jim Jordan and the rest
of them have, the claim of what this
human trafficker says about Trump as somehow vindicating,
because I know what's the best thing to
do is to use a human trafficker statement
as somehow vindicating you as a good person.
To pull totally make sense.
But that means that if you buy that
logic, that means then you are also saying
that Bill Clinton is innocent, that Bill Clinton
never went to the island, which we literally
know isn't true.
So just wrap that around. Wrap enjoy that,
that you are now okay with getting Clinton
off the hook because you want Trump off
the hook. That works out. She voiced her
belief that he was murdered while awaiting Epstein
trial and that his death inside the plate
was staged to look like a suicide. So
they give you that. They give you the
truth in this regard or, you know, the
reality that it wasn't what we were told,
but because
they're downplaying something else. That's how I read
that. But you can decide for yourself.
Now other distractionary points or interesting overlaps to
what we're gonna talk about next, James Lee
points out, and this is an interesting take
on this.
Nobody will say it, so I will. He
says Trump's new flag burning ban is a
cover. Now you could look at that, that
even that statement a lot, by itself
would relate to what I was saying before
too. That it you know, like, it's a
it's a he is going after people wearing
the flag is how I saw it. I
think it's already happening. But used a sort
of like burning
and and, you know, what was it? It
was burning in places that shouldn't be as
well as something else to say it's illegal
so we're gonna go after it. But not
for the flag even though Trump
reiterated it was about the flag, like, six
times, and they're going after people burning a
flag. It's it's obvious. So it's unconstitutional
yet again, but his point is that it's
not even about that at all, which is
an interesting way to think about it. He
says a few weeks ago, courts banned burning
Israeli flags. They did. We mentioned it on
the show, which is just crazy.
So free speech except for the Israeli flag.
Right? Until Trump did this. And but didn't
really is what his point is. He says,
so this is just theater to hide the
fact we're controlled by Israel.
He says, but, hey. Maybe it's just too
much noticing on my part.
I it's a good point. You know? So
if you look at it like you know?
Because as people were really trying to get
me to see, it's not really about the
burning of the flag. See? It's about if
you burn the flag in a place where
it's legal to burn things. Well, then why
would you need to make that up? You
already have a law about burning things that
you weren't supposed to burn things. So it's
obvious. It's just it's a it's a game
of of lazy logic to try to argue
that it's about what it obviously is not.
But, you know, I said that wrong. To
argue it's not about burning the flag.
But if this was if that was correct,
this would make sense.
Maybe both exist. Right? Because I think it
is clearly about more than what this is.
But with the Israeli flag being the only
one, it was a really obvious point, so
he added this. Well, so now they're unconstitutional
in two ways. You know, it's, like, it's
just it's just pretty silly. But I think
that matters. And I think the point is
the flag where these stories are being, you
know, it's about
one thing at the end of the day,
how this all comes together.
Another distractionary point I think is interesting is
that Alex Jones is still continuing to talk
about the huge DOJ actions or at least
he was up until a couple days ago
where he just kinda stopped talking about it
because maybe it's not happening. We'll find out.
Any updates, Alex? I said I'm super excited
about these clearly not fake big, big, big
actions coming. Oh, and is Obama in jail
yet? Since you said that was a sure
thing, asking for a friend. Remember the point
was that because we're not we're gonna get
him like we didn't get Clinton. Right? Well,
maybe it'll happen tomorrow. I mean, maybe there
are big, big things coming. My point is
that he has a very clear track record
despite the narrative of screaming things like this
that literally go nowhere. And he says in
this very clip that you know me. I
don't say things like this if they're not
true, but to which we should all laugh
out loud. The bottom line is, do you
really think we're gonna have some massive rollout
of military tribunals or grand juries about Obama
and Clinton and Brennan and Comer. I certainly
hope so. They're all criminals. And even if
it does happen and I'm wrong about this,
I would still be happy and cheer that
on because we all should.
I just get the clear sense that this
is like many other examples of the past,
and it's about trying to get you to
look anywhere than the obvious, which is that
all of your government left and right is
putting you in a cage right now,
which people like that used to tell you
is coming, and now they don't wanna talk
about it. Another interesting overlap to this, same
kind of thing. I'm a little less like,
I feel I'm clearly much more skeptical of
people like Alex. Tucker, I'm still, you know
I mean, I'm with all of them, I'm
always open. I hope I'm wrong and I
want them to be suddenly seeing the bigger
picture Even if I don't like them or
think they're ridiculous, I would still cheer that
on.
My point is that I still am very
skeptical about this character and where he's going
and how he's half a step out of
the corporate media. It's the way you know?
But, yeah, he pointed some things out I
think are good,
recently more than ever, but a lot of
it is this kind of stuff. For nearly
twenty five years, the story on nine eleven
has been withheld from the American people. Oh,
has it, Tucker? No. No. It hasn't. You
just haven't pointed at it. In fact, you
deride it. You talk down to it. Many
of us have called this out repeatedly for
a very long time. Or, like, right like,
by the way,
right beneath this, shout out to architects and
engineers for nine eleven truth.
That's that's Richard Gage. He's he's been calling
about the entire time.
So but, you know, hey. Maybe he changed
his mind. Maybe he suddenly sees it. Right?
But here's a clip that I think you
should see that's been going around that is
what he changed his mind from if you
think he changed his mind. Worth hearing.
What happened?
Really?
You know, how did you Why did you
why did you why did you fail on
Ron Paul? I'll tell you why. I didn't
fail on Ron Paul. No. I don't It's
when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying
09:11 was an inside job. He didn't say
that. Yeah. He did say that. No. He
said that it was, curious why the FBI
Right.
You know, had been logged in on on
on I'm the I'm the log. I I
got it. I was there. And, but So
you had to leave because that one I
was enraged. I was enraged by it. Was
it controversial? You were You were supposed to
be let me let me let me answer
your question. Sure. It wasn't controversial. It was
stupid.
And if there's any evidence that the government
is behind nine eleven, it looks I and
I believe anything if there's evidence, but there
isn't evidence. K. So here's just funny. Someone
in the chat, which I don't disagree with,
it's a good point to make, is that
he was with Fox News when this happened.
So, you know, the a lot of times
the argument becomes that somehow like that you
know, even though he still to this day
told you that he was never forced to
not say things or pull punches,
but he was, and we know that. It's
obvious
that here he is under Fox. So the
and he's not at a studio. He's out
talking to people. You You know? And there's
no evidence, he says. I mean, at that
time, you know, as a matter of fact,
that's not true. Are you saying he didn't
see or he didn't care about it? I
mean, hey. These aren't things that you evolve.
These aren't opinions that you suddenly wake up
from. That's a lie. Either a lie or
an example of of
bad investigatory
practice or bad not due diligent. Either way,
it speaks
to him
whether or not he evolves opinion about 09:11.
But, hey, we even if he did, though,
then we we if he suddenly sees it,
he's being honest about it today, maybe this
is because he was listening to the wrong
people then. But it still shows you something
about character, about principle, and I do think
that's important.
So knock it off. That's my piece. Okay.
But And I said that to him. Sure.
Sure. But one stupid person says something stupid
at a Ron Paul event. Yeah. I I
hate that. That. And and by the way,
I am open to almost any crackpot theory
about anything. It's just on that subject,
come on. You know what I mean? That's
too much. That even for me. So Doesn't
that sound familiar? Right? You can't talk about
that. None. Look. It's too sacred.
Right? Same thing like many topics in the
world that we're somehow not allowed to talk
about. Not even to say that there's some
conspiracy there's plenty of topics out there where
peep where it's like a thou shall not
I mean, the entire conversation of Israel has
been like that for a long time until
very recently. The point though is that that's
what he's doing. Come on. Not that. That's
too. Not like too soon, you know, or
whatever. It's like, well, the facts are relevant
no matter what time, no matter how uncomfortable.
Just out of curiosity then, what what's your
take on Building 7? Which explanation do you
believe? Yeah.
Come on. It's like this is like No.
This is your question. Which explanation? Did did
it Which explanation? I I There's two explanations.
It was either it was, it was pulled
or it was isolated pockets of fire in
the building
that flew that that were sort of,
sliding pipe.
Towers coming down that brought it down. This
is a no win conversation, so I'm not
gonna continue it. But let me just say
one thing. The macro my macro view is
is the obvious one, which is the billings
came down because a bunch of nutcases were
plain under them. Okay. So are you still
supporting Ron Paul? Yeah. I don't know how
you can walk away thinking that that's something
you can that you know, if he looked
at all at the evidence that was clear
at that point,
that's him gatekeeping.
I don't know. I I don't wouldn't say
I'm supporting Ron Paul. I like Ron Paul.
I've always just Ron Paul. So
are you supporting anybody in the race this
year? No. I don't support it. I don't
I don't even You're an objective journalist? Even
votes on it. I'm hardly objective.
I'm honest. I'm not objective.
Certainly not afraid to speak your mind. No.
I'm not. No. You can assess my views.
You're you're clear. You have any But I
hate that nine eleven crap. Wish they just
kick those people out. I mean Right. Yeah.
How how dare you have an opinion that
we don't like in the inner circle? Just
kick them out.
Really? It's important
for people whose families are still involved to
know the truth whether or not the government
was involved or whether it was terrorists, but
there's a history of government sponsored terror throughout
the past century. I'm Yeah. Exactly. So what
do you mean kick them out?
I don't Right. And so in case you
missed it, he was really dismissive about what
that guy said too. Are you now really
gonna pretend like there's not an obvious history
of the government doing just that? You I
mean, these are not evolving opinions.
You are being willfully ignorant when your paycheck
was important because of that.
That's my clear opinion. You could decide for
yourself. That is not something that you I
mean, look. I I could I get you
could even say it. Maybe he has changed
from that too. Maybe he changed or realized
he wants to be accurate, but it doesn't
change that. Just like I said, it doesn't
matter about the past. If he suddenly starts
doing the right thing, where even for the
wrong reasons consistently, I'll still point to it.
That's opportunism like I keep talking about. But
I will never, with anybody, start going, he's
right because he's been right over here. He
said this all up until now, so I'm
gonna trust the next thing he says. No.
That's what they want from you. Question everything
all the time,
including people like him.
But I simply said, so here, you know,
in twenty five years, right, could he change
his opinion? And I said, I know. I
know. It's certainly possible for CIA to change
their mind over time. Clearly, I'm kind of
joking. Right? The point being, I could say
it's possible for Tucker to change his mind.
Just trying to make a joke. The point
though is that's you can't decouple these things.
I mean, he himself has said, you know,
his father, how he tried to join, all
these overlapping points. And maybe you could decide
whether that means he's doing something or not.
And Spiro said the same thing, but added
what Cynthia McKinney pointed out. She goes he
says this cannot be ignored. Former congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney speaks out. Tucker participated in the nine
eleven cover up and is now playing dumb
to earn street cred. CIA written all over
him. This is from 08/26/2025.
This is '20 August 25. Cynthia McKinney says,
Nick Fuentes is absolutely correct in that Tucker
Carlson and Candace Owens are the guardrails
beyond which deeper looking thought is not permitted.
When I demanded an the independent investigation of
nine eleven,
Tucker led the charge against me. I'm not
interested in thinking with the guardrails in order
to understand the way the world is really
organized. One must go beyond the guardrails, and
that's the conversation I want to have with
you here beyond the guardrails.
Good for her for calling it out.
And she's people are attacking for it just
for saying that. That's her opinion.
Shan Joyce says, I think Tucker should run
this clip on his show. It would be
hilarious.
I don't think it's worth
wrong for people to change their opinions. I
find it it refreshing if they're honest about
it, and Tucker's recent one eighty on the
topic of nine eleven has been fascinating to
watch. Well, it's not really a one eighty
because even now, he's not really like, if
you watch this,
or, you know, the clip that I had
of his, you know, nine eleven history, watch
our five part series. It doesn't even scratch
the surface of what this does. James Corbett,
hands down,
above and beyond anything else you will find.
This I just think you know, I'll I'll
get this.
Oh, the the links are in each of
these videos. This was our watch along that
did Corbett asked us to do. Me and
Brock watched it with him as we did,
like, an anniversary of it, and it was
his three part. And we aired the third
part live of his secret
documentary
called
a false flags, a secret history of al
Qaeda. And it is obviously about nine eleven
and and the many different points before and
after nine eleven around this topic, the secret
history of al Qaeda.
It's
undeniable,
and I say that every time. It's not
like, my opinion. This is a nail to
the wall, receipts,
money. I mean, it's just it's unreal. It's
like it's like talking about Israel and Zionism,
what's going on in the world. You can't
deny it if you're honest about what the
facts you look at the facts. Very important
to check out. And And then compare it
to what Tucker's pointing to. Yeah, there's some
points in there that are
it's it's about showing these things now that
we're so far past it ever the people
in power know that most of us already
know this. They knew it back then when
Tucker was denying it. That's what you know,
it's very clear. So So it's about using
information, in my opinion, now because of the
new thing we're going into. September the old,
and we're going into the technocratic. They're gonna
have some kind of new event, most likely.
But here is a a good,
link for a lot of his best around
$920.11
trillions, nine eleven war games, whistle blowers, suspects,
all these are very important from Corbett, and
you will not find better.
And I'll include just link directly to nine
eleven suspects, which is just very important. Know,
you'll enjoy the dancing Israelis part, the Giuliani
part. They go into all their different overlapping
roles in all of this.
Oh, this I I forgot to add this
up. I don't wanna include that one. I'd
rather you go to,
Corbett's site to look read it. I'll have
that included. And this was the nine eleven
conspiracy theory, which is the four minute kind
of, like,
joking version, but I'll tell you what. If
you watch it and that's only joking in
the sense of these kind of making fun
of how stupid the main narrative is. You
watch this, you'll know more about this story
than any other corporate platform will show you.
Even this. Even just this four minute sort
of making fun of the core the main
narrative.
Now last point on this
or last couple points I wanted to show
you that I thought were relevant.
Woke right strikes again. I just think it's
so interesting to me.
So this person so just so it's clear
very quickly, this is something somebody posted. Who
knows whether it was the person who made
this video or some other democrat out there
doing it. Who knows these days? But you
see it says wanted, JD Vance,
with a crosshair on his head,
And then it says reward 1,000,000.
The other side says reward 1,000,000. And the
bottom says
wanted for cowardice to the American people. And
that's it.
Okay.
So you could assume that that means kill
him or you could you could argue it
means he's targeted.
Look. I'm not we can all play dumb
here. You can clearly argue that that's what
that means in most cases. But in a
court of law, you can't go deem that
they're threatening to kill him. Like the woman
who said, I wish that person was a
better shot. Yes. It's in bad taste in
any context of a human being, but the
reality is,
I mean, well, just really the first easy
one is how often this happens in every
other direction,
about Obama, about Biden, and left and right.
And it's gonna make it okay because the
other side does it. That's the whole point.
It's ridiculous when anybody does it. The point
is you have the right to say what
you want. And in this case, there's no
indication that there's anything other than arrest this
person, and he's the one that should be
targeted.
Does he probably mean shooting him? Probably. But
you don't know that. And my point is
that if it was the other way around
and they did this about Biden or Obama,
which they have, these people would laugh about
it. Which it shouldn't be you shouldn't get
this response, and you I think it's somewhere
in the middle. It should be like, well,
that's probably bad days, but it's clearly their
right to point those things out. Now my
point about saying it doesn't say assassination is
important because the whole video is about these
people are trying to kill him. They're after
they're gonna assassinate him. That's not what it
says. And, of course,
they tag the FBI, which they'll probably turn
into some massive investigation because they wanna distract
you from everything else. Cat turd says life
in prison, no exceptions.
You guys are the same ridiculous people you
make fun of every day. I say it
every time. It's the woke right, the woke
left, and it's not about the way the
versions of that that they put in your
face. It's the same thing regardless of the
side. It is identity politics. It is censorship
based on ideas and words. It is the
same thing.
And they're saying
clutching their pearls at any moment when their
side gets attacked for the right reason is
so funny to me
everywhere you look.
And watch watch this get turned into some
major thing. Look. I mean, I get the
point. Like, there I mean, I would even
argue that at some level, they probably feel
obligated to investigate it regardless. I wouldn't even
understand that for the idea that you might
think that they're secretly, but you claim that
there should be immediate repercussions for simply posting
that
is ridiculous. And when I say I understand
it, don't pretend that means I accept it
or want that. I understand why their logic
would make that sense. That's still a police
state Coming back to you and finding you
because you posted a piece of paper, guys.
That's the reality of it with words on
it. Whatever those words would be, I still
argue is way over the top. But see,
there's a line for people that wanna pretend
like they're fighting the deep state, but then
will quibble about your rights when it comes
to their guy being attacked and blah blah
blah. It's all over the place.
And then I just wanna shout out, say,
Sal Diagris for the picture he put out,
this random meme that I used for the
show today. And it simply says, we stand
with Israel behind some massive technocratic hellscape, and
it says, trust the plan, Patriot's MAGA. And
this the phone says Palantir Social Credit Store
a 100%. Fantastic goy. It's ridiculously
perfect.
So the point overall is that this is
what's clearly happening. Now, yes, you know my
point that we're well beyond the cameras, but
it's you know, I don't know how to
give that impression with some kind of internal
nanotech video on an image. The point was
nonetheless that this is clearly just this all
invasive. You're being surveilled. And, you know, imagine
it's like always.
If the if this I mean, you literally
just stand in a Democrat, anybody
in this position with the exact to a
t outcome, and they would be screaming foul.
We all should be. Understand.
But the preschool that should be the most
upset are the ones that are pulling their
punches for their team like they do every
time in the partisan game.
Now this is a clip that I want
you to see before we get into the
conversation of the shooting and the AI precrime
direction.
And I think it's important to hear.
Arlandara
account says the entire world is horrified with
this evil massacre, Gaza genocide. Now we're not
gonna get into the genocide that today, but
it's important point to make for the over.
This is in a large way why I
think some of these things are happening, and
you'll see what I mean. Listen to this.
Bush person
and as an American,
I am horrified
by the Israeli government's massacre of well over
65,000
Palestinians in Gaza.
I am ashamed
and infuriated that this mass murder is funded
by our American tax dollars.
I know that my call for a liberated
Palestine
comes from a desire for mutual safety
of all people living in the region. And
I know What an antisemite.
That my condemnation
of Israel's bombardment of Gaza is not despite
what I learned in Hebrew school, but because
of it.
Israel's actions are not in the name of
Jewish safety, and it is the very conflation
of Israel's actions with the Jewish people that
continues to endanger
Jews
around
the
world.
See?
My point, guys?
I mean, this is what we've been talking
about. Right? Like, in particular, this is a
famous actress,
Jewish actress who who is calling out Zionism,
calling out not just Zionism, but that it
is a lie.
What it is doing is hurting the Jewish
population of the world. This is
despite the pushback, like, it's we all have
our echo chambers, and I get that I
mean, even myself, it can be, like, for
example, I often fall into the trap where
I think more people know about something than
than I recognize. It feels like it, you
know, because you've we all have those. And
but as long as you're questioning that and
considering that, checking yourself, that's all you can
do. But my point is that regardless of
what we think is happening, we debate about
who sees it, it the when we have,
like, the highest levels of the conversation, even
the corporate media forced to admit certain things
when they are you know, have to, it
the the whole world sees this. There's just
no way around it. But to the point
of specifically
as on a main stage literally relaying the
idea that Israel or Zionism
is using Judaism,
is tricking people into hurting people through that
idea,
Isn't that what I'm always talking about? My
point is to show you that it is
the highest level. The world is shifting, if
not, has already shifted around what they know,
what they have proven Zionism is and is
not today.
I think it's monumentally important, and my point
was people are truly getting it.
But now that this is happening,
get ready for some jarring event to be
created or used in order to, oh, too
late, kind of joking. Right? I mean, I'm
not necessarily saying that's what this was, but
just trying to make a point. Right? Is
that when these things happen, when there is
a massive watershed moment or, you know, the
Overton window is being broken,
you tend to get things like this that
try to you know, whether it's a shooting
that is used or manufactured
and or or, you know, just something that
randomly happens that they ultimately use anyway, same
first one I made,
or any number of other things. Maybe it's
multiple events. Maybe it's nothing. I just want
you to consider the idea that when there
are moments when the power structure is losing
control over any number of things, the narrative,
most importantly,
you tend to find jarring events that take
place
that are either, you know, like I said,
grabbed because they happen all over the place
here and there and used
or created.
Now this, guys, is something in I just
can't like, we can go back to, like,
the Orlando shooting or the I mean, any
number of these examples where you had the
weird same thing with the same kind of
writing. We had the one in,
the one I forget I forget which location.
The one where, you know, many of them,
by the way, that seem to be connected
to the Azov movement when that was the
thing and now you know, it's just clearly,
like, now with the new thing, and now
it's connected to something else. Or the different
trans overlaps. And they all had this same
kind of vibe with the writing and the
we'll go through it.
It just to me, it screams that it's
something that was in some way driven into
reality in order to
rat to like, in this case
even though, by the way, it was a
Catholic locate is it sure a Catholic school,
I guess,
because of there was anti Semitic writings or
things about Israel, that's the only thing they're
over focusing on.
And it seems pretty strange to me, but
let's go through it.
So first, here's FBI director Kash Patel. As
we continue to investigate yesterday's barbaric attack from
Robert Westman, the male subject, our and, you
know, the the course the point is that
it is a, I guess, what, a trans
woman as they what they call it. Right?
So it's a man who turned himself into
a woman. And now I think it's Robin,
West Westman, or I think that's what it
was. Right?
Yeah. But even Westman, that's just the name
itself. I don't know. Remember when Catherine talked
about, like, the Gruber and that group people
on the CDC thing? Like, these names have
more meaning. You realize it's Westman. It just
seemed kind of interesting to point out, but
that it is a
a a man that you know, biologically, a
man who turned himself into a woman. Our
team and his name was
Robert Paul Westman, but then turned himself into
Robin or called him that. Our teams
have gathered information and evidence demonstrating this was
an act of domestic terrorism
motivated by a hate filled ideology.
So this is the hate filled ideology.
Now what does that mean to you? Does
that mean that he hated people enough to
kill them? Well, that's not what they mean.
This is there this is a category.
Like, let's just say you decided I'm gonna
kill the people because they insulted me that
day. You could call that hate,
but to call an ideology
is a step farther. Now I think this
is clearly about trying to create a category
in which people will be couched, like we
see with Palestine, like we see with people
calling out Israel, just in the same way.
But arguably, what we can see is that
is exactly what's happening. But I just mean
in general, though, general terms, whatever the focal
point is, this is how it will be
used, and I think it's important to see
that. But right now, one of the big
buzz points, antisemitism,
clearly.
The
I mean, even the gun conversation is leanly
is being you're gonna get this from the
right guys. Donald Trump has been somebody leading
that in a lot of ways even from
the right with the bump stock action, the
idea of due process later with guns.
Maybe if if, Brian from Heimpyk Flux will
tell you that this weird how few people
wanna point out the bump stock ban.
Overall,
I think we're gonna
my opinion is it's the government entirely and
that this will be used in that very
way. And, of course, though, it comes down
to the idea that we have to do
so because of, you know, something that will
be used by, like, immigration, obviously, I think
will play a part in all of this.
But some updates, he writes, subject left multiple
anti Catholic,
anti religious references both in his manifesto written
on his firearms. Okay. So if it was
anti religion, why is it that we're over
why is the conversation seeming to hyper focus
it on just Israel,
just Palestine,
just well, I think you obviously know why.
But it says subject expresses hatred and violence
toward Jewish people, writing Israel must fall. Well,
that's not the same thing. Free Palestine.
Not the same thing. And using explicit language
related to the holocaust.
He wrote an explicit call for violence against
president Trump on a firearm magazine,
which is, again, you that's my point of
you getting from the mainstream alternative media types,
making it about some effort of the Democrats
to go after Trump, you know, and then
tying in the Palestine aspect as if that's
somehow only left. You know, the typical lazy
arguments you get from people that wanna make
it about what they wanna make it about
and ignore the bigger picture, which is clearly,
it's not about left and right. It never
really is if you understand how this works.
He wrote an explicit call for violence against
Trump. The FBI investigation is still ongoing. We
will employ all of our counter terror tools
to ensure this is fully investigated.
Okay. In the meantime, what's going on with
the Epstein list? In the meantime, what's going
on with the people you were going to
I mean, how about the ongoing
pile of people that you told us were
doing things behind the scenes, the holdovers from
the FBI, the people with the Social Security
who were stealing information,
All these people. What about Gates and all
the yeah. That's all old news.
Promises promises promises not kept, and we're gonna
keep going. Well, let's pretend like everything's on
the up and up.
So
this, I'll include for you. Like I said,
this is not gonna be some deep dive
on the nuance of the story because I
think it's kinda clear that these things are
almost meant to drag you into some never
ending rabbit hole. This is what it seems
to me every time. But I will keep
up on these things that I've always have
In the past, I think this is what
we've begun to see. Like like any like
like, Butler, I felt like it was a
very obvious example. It's not even to say
that it's the same thing, but it's clear
that that just got dropped.
Like, even even plenty of people in Trump's
on Trump's side of this are still pointing
out that that story was kinda just didn't
resolve. Nobody prove we we got we got
given a fake story that half of the
team sport politics crowd just told you was
the reality. So now they're the ones towing
the mainstream narrative, and they just move forward.
Or like plenty of them. Or even Epstein's
a good example. Are we just gonna let
that drift into the background? Seriously?
So this to me is anything like this,
I'm very I'm cautious about that being the
reality.
And And, honestly, my like I said, my
opinion is that this is about what they're
using it for, not even necessarily way the
way it went down, which plenty are of
they're focusing on that themselves, and I'm not
to say that's not important.
This is interesting, though. Bigfoot says the Fultrin,
TransFesto manifesto from the,
Annunciation
Catholic school shooting in Minneapolis
and started to try to translate it, but
then gave up down here and said, never
mind.
So that was funny. Okay. I'm giving up.
This didn't realize it was a 100 pages,
but but some of them, they did translate.
But I don't know if you can take
that,
at, you know, who knows if they made
a mistake or not, but take it for
what you will. The one thought the one
I did think was interesting is that it's
basically
flipping through the manifesto.
So and and it's, you know, written in,
I guess, you know, whatever it's called, silo
or, like, Russian, essentially,
language types,
which I think is interesting.
And, apparently, there's evidence they're wearing some kind
of FSB jacket. There's all sorts of points
that seem to kind of convolute this, but
really just seem to add you know, it's
like all your hits at one point. You
can make it about Ukraine if you want.
You can make it about Ozawa. You can
make it about trade. You can make it
about the guns. You can make it about
you know? So it just seems like kind
of an interesting point.
But, of course, again, my point is all
domains through alternative media going after this,
mentioning things, by the way, that are interesting,
like CIA connections, DOD connections, which are pretty
much the the usual now. Right? You get
the manifesto. You get the background connections. They
try to hide it first.
Right? But the the bigger picture of it
is that they're just seemingly trying to force
this into a left right paradigm discussion.
That's I think that's quite obvious right now.
Now I wanna include a couple of points
that I think are relevant to this, both
some of the coverage before, also some previous
elements before we get into the Gideon precrime
kind of use of this story. First, just
this story in general that we've covered. This
is actually written by Matt Agres from the
the Free Thought Project. Parents catch FBI and
plot to force mentally ill son to be
a right wing terrorist from 2038.
It just goes it's just about the bigger
point is that it's easy for people in
the in FBI,
CIA, any number of overlaps, Israeli intelligence
to abuse, manipulate, take advantage of people,
especially people in this kind of position.
But realize that you need I mean, the
MK Ultra overlap, the whether you know, that
has such a buzzword.
Just understanding, like, social engineering, predictive programming, those
are all everywhere.
Taking a step further, though, when we talk
about neuroscience, neuroweapons, these are not a joke.
James Giordano from the US government will tell
you about that all day long. Katherine Austin
Fitts tell argues they're being used on people
today.
And these are things that could, as we've
shown you from the vaccine overlap or just
using magnetogenetics,
optogenetics, or other inputs or other you other,
you know or I mean or even that
is a whole different topic from just being
able to somehow, like, brainwash somebody. But these
points are all in the world. They do
exist, and the and DARPA and the government
have never stopped going after them. Realize my
point is that with this guy and the
weird overlaps, we should at the very least
be questioning that. And, obviously, there's so many
kind of continuing points through this that just
it's almost like they're all part of some
club or that they were all emulating each
other, which is certainly possible, or that it
was being driven into for a certain agenda.
But this is something that is a clear
case, and it's happened many times in the
past despite the fact, by the way, they
ultimately put him in jail anyway, despite the
fact that he was literally proven to have
been set up. That's how the government works
for you, though.
Caitlin Johnstone, another point before all this.
August 27. This is from twenty sixth. Israeli
intelligence forces oh, this first, I'll just read
what she said. Sure was nice of Iran
to stage anti Semitic attacks in Australia. This
just happened. It's not actually what it was.
Which solely advanced the interest of Israel and
benefit Iran in no way whatsoever. Very kind
of Iran to help Israel like that. If
you didn't see it, their argument was Iran
was staging anti Semitic attacks
or conducting them in Australia.
And she said, quick question. What foreign intelligence
agencies associated with ASIO in this assessment?
Guess guess who?
Israeli intelligence forces might have played a part
in uncovering the Iran plot that led to
the expulsion of Iranian officials from Australia. Right?
So they expelled Iranian officials because somebody carried
out anti Semitic attacks.
And I think when you look back at
the larger history, which Caitlin Johnstone is clearly
pointing to, Israel has a very long obvious
track record of doing this themselves and blaming
anybody else. I mean, being caught for it.
ADL marches, like, are literal,
let's see if I can get that actually.
There we go. Perfect. Look at that.
This is oops. Of course, that happens every
time. This is just one of the links
from the show I did. Only I'll grab
that since I'm doing it, but this is
an a report. ADL provocateurs at work inciting
Nazi rallies.
Literally naming the people we talk about. James
Gutman,
what's it, Mordecai something. These people this was
people that were literally caught
in Chicago and elsewhere. ADL members who were
faking Nazi marches. In in in alternative ways,
we see them faking to be Palestinians and
carrying out attacks. They did this publicly when
they shot people in that hospital. It's a
very common track record. In fact, they've got
a name for it that I can't remember
of when they dress up like Palestinians. The
the Israeli media call talk about it.
And fake things is my point. So the
overarching point about this is that clearly,
Caitlin Johnstone was simply making a joke about
it, but Israel was involved with that investigation.
Do you really think for a second that
Iran was out there conducting anti Semitic attacks,
which is not even the reality of what
the vast majority of if any Iranians actually
think when you actually listen. It's just so
lazy what all this is. It's about they're
going after Iran, so they do this in
Iran. The same thing is happening here. So
we should be considering this.
Oh, this is the show I include where
we go over all these things. Zionism versus
Nazism, Israel's connection to extremist ideology, and ADL's
history of faking Nazi marches.
It's not new.
Now my point of all of that is
to show you that this is something that
they've been,
the powers that shouldn't be are out there
stoking these things all over the place to
drive things like this. And I very much
believe that. That's not to say that everything
we could point to is necessarily fake or
created,
used for
sure. And I do think the first two
in many
cases, this is where it's always been going.
Now realistically,
we have been screaming about this
for the longest time. Whitney and I have
talked about this on so many shows about
first precrime, and she has been leading the
way about calling out Bill Barr and the
Trump administration about how they have created this.
And over the years, we've talked about it
until it evolved into medical precrime, and COVID
nineteen overlaps, which was also done. It's not
just about Trump, though. It's about the government
and all sides of it. But for those
that need to hear it, he's been an
instrumental part of rolling this all out. So
let's play a couple of things that were
before this happened. This is from three months
ago. Aaron Cohen, Gideon, AI powered threat detection
for law enforcement, which seems to be what
is literally
I'm gonna go ahead and argue has been
there for a while and is now being
told to you that we're installing and getting
this ready when I think it's been used,
tested, and had been done for a long
time. That's my opinion. But if you historically
look back, almost always how it goes. Usually,
maybe the military, but I'm of the mind
this was probably done, like, during a COVID
nineteen time frame. Sometime when people weren't there
and this stuff was massively installed. I think
we already know this is what they're capable
of. Just my opinion. Regardless of any of
that, before we got here, this is what
this is his channel, what he was discussing.
The shooter in DC showed up outside a
Jewish museum
armed and radicalized.
Free freak out a sign.
Just like Parkland,
Uvalde,
Colorado,
the warning signs were there.
Ninety eight percent of attackers leak intent
online.
This shooter didn't meet some Hamas recruiter in
an alley.
He met an algorithm,
but no one caught it. And that's why
I'm building Gideon,
the first
system that flags threats before they attack.
Great.
That's that's free crime.
Well, okay. Right. He didn't just meet Hamas,
like, because that's what this is. Right?
No. Not even remotely. It's about people that
care about Israel murdering children. On top of
that, the person there there's a whole another
story we can get into, but not to
distract from today's point. My point, though,
is he's talking about the idea that this
was an algorithm.
Right? So it's not you you the the
algorithm. So some something online that has to
be kept from you is what that
means. Right? So there's something out there. So
it's content. It's ideas. It's certain technology that
we have to block
and keep you safe from, but also monitor
you all the time to make sure that
you weren't taken advantage of by that. This
is exactly what this is. AI powered threat
detection for law enforcement.
The system that stops the next attack before
it starts.
How long have we been telling you this?
There's no and look, there's no way you
can make this line up with constitutional rights.
Never gonna happen. But that's why they've been
priming you this whole time for being okay
with removing rights slightly because they'll come back
later. Promise.
Do you not see how this works? Three,
four different stories now. They have been slowly
creating the situation where whether you realize it
or not, you've been becoming okay with them
ignoring your rights where they had a good
excuse for it.
Here's the next one.
This one, also, it's a little bit later,
three months ago still, but later in the
month, the AI system that flags threats before
the next attack.
Same kind of advertisement. I think interesting the
overlap.
I wanna take a minute and talk to
you about something serious that I've been working
on behind the scenes.
I'm building something called Gideon, or in Hebrew,
we call it Gidon.
And this is the first real time
AI powered
threat detection
system
for law enforcement and schools.
It's a system that scans the open web,
social media, Reddit,
Discord, gaming chats,
and flags
real behavioral signals
before someone picks up a rifle
and walks into a school.
We're talking grievance buildup,
martyrdom language, tactical planning.
These are the same patterns
that I And you you don't think that
those are gonna be clearly applied to things
that they wanna frame as bad? Martyrdom.
Right. So people that are dying for their
cause because you're murdering all of them, is
that a terrorist? Or is it when you're
committing the caring that kills children? Is that
they're fighting against terrorism? The point is when
you look it through a certain lens, you
can frame how you want to be the
bad language and the bad ideas and the
bad religion. That's what this comes down to.
As always, as Whitney has told you, it's
about bad information in, bad information out. They
are the ones guiding this.
Have been seen for years before every major
attack,
now flagged before it happens.
And I've already got law enforcement agencies
on board ready to pilot it. But to
get this fully live and to bring it
to the engineers and finish the platform,
I need your help.
I'm raising funds directly from my audience, from
Cohen's Commandos,
the people who actually care to bring Gideon
to life.
And if you've ever asked yourself, why didn't
someone catch this before it happens?
This is the answer.
Hit the link down below in the description
and donate what you can, and please
share it. And if you're one of the
heavy hitters out there watching,
if you've got access, reach,
capital,
and you wanna help seed my new project
at scale,
reach out to me directly and let's talk.
Gotta love this important music in the background.
He's clearly you are being
you're being conned. How much you wanna bet
all the Posobics and the Benny Johnsons and
the Catchers, they all reached out and were
like, I wanna be involved. How much you
wanna bet?
This isn't about politics. Of course not. This
is about protecting
America.
Right. Israeli Mossad, Unit 800 built protection for
America. Protecting our kids, and it's about giving
law enforcement
signal. Unconstitutional.
Before the next tragedy
unfolds. Right. This is because you can be
arrested before you've committed a crime, because that
makes sense. Right?
In what way do you prove that? How
in the world can you well, this is
not some minority report situation where you've got
some psychic in the water. How are you
gonna prove that they were going to commit
the crime? You understand?
If you stop them when they're about to,
they still did not commit the crime, but
they're gonna charge them with that. Or how
about you get caught before it even happens
the day before?
How does this actually work? In any way
you spin this, it is a violation of
your rights, and we know it will be
abused. It always is. And already with the
facial recognition they're using, they're they're saying 90%
accurate, and we already have examples of people
being arrested when they're not the person. 93%
match, or was it 97? The one that,
Jason just recently shared,
they had a 90 something percent match arrested
him. He turned out not to be the
guy. My point is we know that it
is not as accurate as they claim,
especially when it's being driven by an Israeli
intelligence entity.
Is Gideon.
This is my new mission.
Help me build it, and let's do it
together.
Appreciate you guys.
Gideon's worry. So these literal this is, like,
just advertisement sales.
121,000
subscribers?
Okay. So
Aaron Cohen is a former Israeli special operations
veteran known for his service in the
Duvedev how do you say that? Duvedevan unit,
a counterterrorism unit in the Israeli Defense Forces.
He is the founder of Gideon, an AI
powered threat detection system designed to identify per
potential threats by scanning open web platforms like
Reddit, Discord. You'd heard the whole thing. He
comes from unit eighty two hundred.
Of course. Because that's totally random. Right? We've
never heard that before. Or is it literally
every single time we ever talk about one
of these things that just happens to be
Israeli intelligence doing the eighty two hundred run,
whether it's carbine or I mean, every every
single thing we've talked about, All these points
of connection, there's the startup nation point. It's
always there.
I don't know why that's not a problem.
Look. Even even if you argue
that, like, Israel shouldn't be a just Israel,
shouldn't be a pro okay. That Israel's government
is literally committing a genocide using AI in
all the ways they're doing it, and we're
not concerned about how that may overlap with
what we're dealing with here.
I mean, it's it's literally the analogy is
like saying that you're okay using the Nazi
tech because if they're over there, they're not
we're not involved with the Nazis killing all
the people over there. We're we're using their
tech for good reason. You know? But or
or and allowing Nazis to have back end
access, but that's okay because they won't do
that over here. It just seems pretty stupid,
doesn't it?
So here's a clip.
Now first, let me play the short. This
is the one going around the Internet. I
just wanna get it in your mind. It's
the quick, you know, kind of pitch he
does. But I do I wanna watch we'll
skim through it, but there's, like, a nine
minute box discussion that I wanted to go
through. Hear what he has to say, because
he's laying this out, and it is not
sugar coated. It is straight
up pre crime. We're we're gonna predict this
when we're we're gonna surveil, we're gonna spy,
we're going to catalog information, which, by the
way, they've already all done, And we're gonna
apply this tech, AI driven, and we're going
to tell you who's about to be the
problems.
Sure. We can just totally see that it
won't overlap in all the directions they're all
totally leaning right now and the way the
Trump administration has been bastardizing everything they're doing
against very certain populations. Because we know it
won't be more of that. Right?
Here's the clip first.
I am now about to launch Gideon, America's
first ever AI threat detection platform
built specifically for law enforcement.
It scrapes the Internet twenty four seven using
an Israeli great ontology
to pull specific Meaning Israeli tech. Now he
is an Israeli intelligent entity. He's using Israeli
built tech to scan every single thing that
you're using today.
No big deal. Thick threat language and then
routes it to local law enforcement.
It's a twenty four seven That's where Carbine
comes in as well, by the way. We've
talked about this for how long now? Detective
that never sleeps, and it's going to get
us in front of these attacks. Would it
have picked up on this, do you think?
100%.
I wish Oh, 100%.
Yeah. That's a that's always a good you
know, anybody who says a 100% on anything
should usually be looked at with skepticism. Right?
100%.
Very
little is ever a 100% in this world,
especially something with tech, especially something with math
and algorithms. Guys, that is him selling you.
A 100% is not ever going to be
the case with something like this. There's always
an anomalies, and they will tell you that.
But when he sits there and tells you
a 100%,
of course, the typical way that we go,
that was Trump speaking off the cuff. It'll
be whatever we need to make it all
make sense. Okay. Oh, he just meant very
clearly, you know. No. He said a 100%.
That's what he meant. And if you read
and watch out, that's what he does everywhere
else as well. This I wish my program
would already be up. We're not launching until
next week. I've got a dozen agencies on
board, Trace. I just A dozen agencies on
board. Think about that. Just like that. Okay.
So, this guy, an Israeli intelligence entity, unit
eighty two hundred, has been building this thing
and just has it ready, making videos about
it, going, give me money. We need to
get this moving. And then boom, this happens.
And then within moments, he's got multiple
agencies. Now, look, clearly, I'd be willing to
bet you because of his connections, because of
what he's doing, that he probably was already
doing that. But I do think it's very
obvious that this I mean, well, how many
did you say?
Just he's on board trace. I just downloaded
a a dozen agencies on board. A dozen
a dozen agencies.
I mean, just think about the time it
would take to get in contact with a
dozen different
intelligence agencies,
have meetings about this, discuss it, relay what
you I mean, that just it's
in the it indicates to me that this
was something that was already going on. Trace,
I just downloaded a major Northeast,
agency with over 2,700
sworn. This is America's early warning system. Okay.
Correct. I am Northeast,
agency
with over 2,700
sworn.
2,700
sworn. Does that mean 2,700
police?
Investigators?
You could decide. I mean, we're talking about
an AI precrime unit that's already being built
out. Sure glad Americans got to say what
they think about it. I mean, is this
are we still pretending that we have some
kind of influence on what the happens? Just
mandate. Mandate. Whatever he says, mandate.
I guarantee that this is not what most
people think they were voting for.
But let's watch this longer clip.
That was the part that, you know, is
important to hear, a pitch.
But listen to the discussion.
Veteran Aaron Cohen, retired LAPD lieutenant Mark Evans,
and Fox News contributor, and former FBI special
a veteran Aaron Cohen retired. Isn't that funny?
I'm just laughing since this is the clip
we that they posted. Take note note that
they cut they kinda weirdly cut off what
he is in his introduction. You think that's
by accident?
Jalap's veteran, Aaron Cohen, ret veteran?
Colin?
Yeah. Israeli unit eighty two hundred
intelligence veteran? Funny how they cut that part
off. One more time just for good measure.
This is all the way back. This is
the one that they posted. It's on Fox
News' channel.
Chelabs veteran Aaron Cohen, retired LAPD lieutenant Mark
Evans, and Fox News contributor and former FBI
special agent It's Aaron Cohen's channel, which makes
it even better. Just to make sure just
to show you real quick. This is his
channel.
So
he, I mean, he chose to cut off
his own title. Does that not scream
everything?
Does to me.
Parker
veteran Aaron Cohen, retired LAPD lieutenant Mark Evans
and Fox News contributor. And he has that
typical kind of, like, I wanna rip your
face off Zionist look, doesn't he? And former
FBI special agent Nicole Parker.
It's great to have you on. It's a
it's a sad night to do this. Nicole,
I wanna start with you first. I wanna
the FBI director, Kash Patel, posted this on
x, quoting here, the FBI is investigating this
shooting as an act of domestic terrorism
and hate crime targeting Catholics. Is he right,
Nicole? Is this a hate crime in your
opinion?
I think that's an understatement. I think this
is a hate crime and a lot more,
and I appreciate that Kash Patel is stepping
in and saying, you know what? Let's look
at this as a federal crime.
Obviously, this should As opposed to what?
Right? I mean, this see, what that was
meant to be is about the race part
of it. But, yeah, but let's pretend like
shooting children isn't a federal crime.
This just as always, this is the caliber
of person that they use. It's embarrassing. Deceased.
A self inflicted gunshot wound. But it is
so important that the FBI steps in and
discovers how this happened and investigates it as
a hate crime or possible domestic terrorism.
Yeah. It's amazing to me because I wanna
put this up. The Minneapolis police chief, he
he gave a couple of news conferences today,
Aaron Cohen,
and some pretty compelling information along the way.
He said the following here. I wanna get
your take on this.
We're also aware of a manifesto
that the shooter had timed to be released
on YouTube.
This manifesto appeared to show him at the
scene and included some disturbing writings.
That content has since been taken down with
the assistance of the FBI.
And why is that? Right? Don't we always
ask that? How is that in the interest
of information free speech? Right?
I think that's very interesting. But I almost
think it's usually if especially with case like
this, it's almost about trying to drive you
to seek it out and read it yourself
because it's out there. Right? So either way,
it's interesting that it always happens because realistically,
you know,
I think in the in the interest of
information, it should be something people should be
able to look at, especially since it was
publicly posted, but also that you know that
they would use that in many ways. So
it's up for you to decide, but I
think it's interesting nonetheless.
And it now remains under active review by
our investigators.
So he clearly planned this. He had the
manifesto
going live on YouTube at a certain time.
Clearly, there was some thought that went into
this, Aaron. I mean and nobody was tipped
off.
This is 100
domestic terrorism. I'm a tell you why, Trace.
This is ideologically
motivated. This was tactical,
and this was intentional.
80%
of these domestic lone wolf terrorists
post some type of grievance online. It's, you
know, it's the same point about anything else.
Why is it that we make a special
category?
He murdered people, put him in jail, or
he's keep the point is well, you know,
it's funny. I actually I actually,
let me read off some points for you
here. Just I'm sure you guys are already
well versed, but for those that are new,
we're not focusing on the actual incident. Let
me tell you some things in a second.
My point though is that,
Was intentional.
Oh, yeah. The idea that, you know so
it's it's like we talk about with the
religious point or, you know, hate crimes. Right?
Because the same kind of overlap.
Why if the person commits a crime, charge
them for the crime.
The idea that it's somehow specially, you you
know, we charge them with extra time because
they did it a certain way, it's always
politicized.
Right? I'm not saying diminish anything. They this
per a person who does something like this
should go to jail for the rest of
their life. But the idea that it's extra
worse because it was done with a certain
word in their mouth, it just feels manipulative
always to me. It's the same thing with
any of these conversations. We make that point
largely about the hate speech point where you
make it a hate crime versus just the
crime that it already is. But
the point is we already went over the
name. I just I'll list these off for
those that are, you know, I haven't I've
I've had made a point to read these
before, and I forgot. It's it was the
Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Two children were killed, eight and 10, 18
injured.
Legally purchased firearm.
Always important. You're not gonna hear that most
of these conversations because that doesn't work for
the narrative.
Was a apparently, a shotgun and a pistol.
Self inflicted gunshot wound at the end. The
reports are that he killed himself. No known
criminal history.
Interesting as always. The YouTube videos that he
put out, including the manifesto you saw, displayed
weapons with hateful messages, including anti Semitic and
anti Israel slogans,
including. Doesn't it isn't it funny that that,
like, carved out, as always, in the reporting,
displayed hateful messages. Shouldn't that be enough?
Including
and list off two specific hate hate messages.
Okay. So that's a special category. That's all
you mean by that, which is how most
of them are covering it. Don't even though
that there was hate you know, Catholic,
it's hyper focused by almost everybody on that
one topic.
References to past shooters and says one of
them things said kill Donald Trump. And I
so I told you about the language.
80%
of these domestic lone wolf terrorists
post some type of grievance online. Matthew Crooks,
900 post between 2020 and So do you
already see where this goes?
Yeah. Sure. You could list off the things
that those people that did something whether, you
know, not even considering for the moment whether
they were used, manipulated, driven to it, fake,
whatever. The point is, ultimately,
with this circumstance, you can now argue that
if I post something online, that they have
a justifiable reason to come and investigate me.
Well, yeah. If you go, I'm going to
do something, that's different. Even then though, understand,
there's this is where you get to that
very, very fine line of
yeah, where even, like, on a fire in
a theater, I will air on the side
of your rights to say what you want,
especially since you could actually think that was
the case and be wrong.
It's other people's responsibility for how they act
in their life, not yours because you lied
to them and they reacted irrationally. The point
is, yes, it's irresponsible person to do it,
but the idea that you make it somehow
a crime to say something is always over
the top for me. But in this case
Lone wolf terrorist
post some type of grievance online. Right. Right.
So in this case, we're talking about the
idea of posting content or saying something. And
so even if you said, okay. Let's say
I wanna kill this person.
When did it become a crime to simply
say something, post something? And look, I'm not
trying to like, there's like I said, I
can understand the logic of somebody in a
field saying, let's go look at that guy.
But I just I think it's obvious that
there's a line that's always crossed where they
become in invasive.
In like, you go go back before the
Internet. Right? When you just said that, when
somebody was talking with their friends about how
they wanted to hurt somebody else, would they
get arrested for like, it it got to
a point to where this has become so
invasive, and it goes further than that. I'm
just kinda setting the tone with something that's
obvious. So what happens if you go online
and you say, like, I really wish that
person would die?
Okay. Now it's a little different, isn't it?
I'm willing to bet you you could keep
walking that line.
You're gonna get places where we already know
where people who are on, quote, their side
or people they don't wanna go after. Let's
say an Israeli spy or an Israeli sex
predator that comes here and gets something wrong
and they let him go. You know, things
like that where, let's say, that guy while
he was here said, I wanna kill that
person. They go, well, he didn't mean it.
Right? Or, you know, Elon's Nazis will go,
well, he didn't mean it. No. They'll go
out of the way. And then everybody else
would don't even do it. We are Nazis
regardless because they actually think that. Wink, wink.
The point is they will lean into it
whatever they want.
And so why you get to this point
to where people with the wrong political ideas,
people who support the wrong thing will say
something that, you know, like, which can be
construed, could be manipulated into arguing that's what
he really meant.
And maybe that's what they meant. But now
we're in a very different situation where you're
saying this is what they meant, so we
have to get go after them because this
Israeli spy says that you were gonna do
something bad.
You know as well as I that this
is murky water, and they are rushing into
it with no there's no deliberation. He's already
spoken to 12 agencies. He's got a team
set up. They're already doing this because my
point is they already have been. And we
can pretty much prove that, maybe not with
Gideon, but this is only rushing it in
further.
And we I think we all sense this
is wrong. Even if you are of the
mind that people who are threatening online should
be arrested, This will be abused like every
other thing people in like, do you go
back to the origin point of, like, the
founding fathers?
Whether they could envision this kind of future
or not, the point was always the same.
Regardless of the logic, you don't give them
powers like this. You just don't because it
will always be used against you. But now
we're just so mired in all these political
talking points that we can't remember where we
started.
Matthew Crooks, nine hundred post between 2020 and
2022.
The, DC shooter, 900 page manifesto.
100%
domestic terrorism. And I bet you, in addition
to that manifesto,
there's a very significant breadcrumb Daisy,
trail Yeah. Leading back who knows how many
weeks, months, or even years. This is the
new face of terrorism. This Okay. So years.
So now he's talking about something you maybe
have said years before it would have happened,
and he somehow knew that you were gonna
kill people in that room ten years later.
I how can you even suggest something like
that?
You must see I'm okay. Then you could
fold another point.
How about you get to a point now
where you let's just say they're going getting
criminals and the streets are safer.
But then, like always, somebody like this, a
rogue cop who hates his girlfriend, you know,
whatever the circumstance becomes, where then somebody gets
framed.
Well, they'll tell you, always, they'll tell you
they've got safeguards in place. Historically, how does
that usually end up? Where where the safeguards
had loopholes, where they weren't there in the
first place, whether they you know, it's not
secret. It happens every and see, there's very
few times in this where I'll say things
like that, but it is.
I can't remember a situation that didn't end
up with some example where it turned out
they weren't completely honest about how every time
in my experience with something like this, the
government has misled you.
So even if it works to the best
of the best scenario you could possibly imagine,
you're still opening the door to a situation
where
it's all encompassing power.
There's no way to get around that.
I don't again, same point. We should never
allow any government to have this kind of
power regardless of whether it'll be used for
the right reasons. You just don't. There's no
longer post nine eleven terror organized Al Qaeda
trace. These are radicalized
online lone wolves, and The United States is
ten years behind these threats. We need to
catch up. And I wanted to get your
your opinion on the breaking news here because
the first lady, Melania Trump, just called for
more. And this is quoting here preemptive
intervention
when it comes to ID ing school shooters.
It's kind of your bailiwick, Aaron. Trace, as
you know, correct 100%, and she's 100
correct. I am now about to launch Gideon,
America's
first ever AI threat detection platform
built specifically for law enforcement.
It scrapes the Internet twenty four seven using
an Israeli grade ontology
to pull specific threat language and then routes
it to local law enforcement. It's a twenty
four seven detective. It never sleeps, and it's
going to get us in front of these
attacks. Would it have picked up on this,
do you? 100%.
I wish this I wish my program would
already be up. We're not launching until next
week. I've got a dozen agencies on board
trace. I just unloaded a major Northeast,
agency with over 2,700
sworn. This is America's early warning system. Lieutenant
Mark Evans, it's great to have you on
here. I mean, the the the principal of
Annunciation Catholic School said the following here about
being Can you believe can you realize there's
not been a single mention? Because a journalist
would give them the the, you know, other
sides. Okay.
This sounds great. Maybe it'll protect us all.
But what about the constitutional concerns? You know,
at the very least, give the but, nope,
not even the feigned
back and forth. Not the not even the
pretend full story, both sides or whatever they
used to pretend they are.
How is that not how is how do
you not engage with that
inside the church?
Within seconds of this situation beginning,
our teachers were heroes.
Children were ducked down.
Adults were protecting children. Older children were protecting
younger children. And as we heard earlier, it
could have been significantly worse without their heroic
action.
I know you And as somebody, you know,
as we'll get to in a minute, the
Melania Point, as you mentioned. We'll we'll go
through that. Your experience, I've covered the school
shootings now, sadly, for twenty seven years. Anytime
we know that there are adults in the
room, in the schools, in whatever rooms that
kids happen to be in, they always tend
to fare better, Mark. I agree with that,
Tracy. And you could tell by the response
that they had done some type of training
Yeah. And they were able to get kids
down and try to control. Great. So now
yeah. Then now they're rationalizing school shooting training.
Right? Instead of just having people there that
can protect the kids. Right? An actual reality,
like, the like, by the way, Thomas Massey
in Tennessee is trying to push to allow
the to, you know, I guess, what the
to revoke the the law as it stands
for,
gun free zones for schools, but allow the
schools to dictate their own policies.
You know, it's especially in a state like
this where it's open carry and concealed carry,
the idea that you somehow like, it just
doesn't make any sense. Or parks, they just
rescinded that in Tennessee as well. Why I
like this place? That where you're like, the
idea is that somehow you are allowed to
conceal carry, which are in Tennessee, you can
conceal carry with no permit. It's how it
should be. The reality being that you can
go to a park, though, and they've always
said, oh, that's against the law, you know,
until somebody goes out there and gets raped
or somebody gets beat up. And the point
is that, ultimately, that is protection.
It's funny, the response you get from people.
Something look. I get it. People disagree with
that.
But we can all acknowledge that it's a
enshrined constitutional right. Right? I mean, oh, yes.
Even that we disagree on. It's just so
lazy where this goes. You can like, there
are things that I may feel differently on,
but the reality is the reality, guys. And
it is something that is your enshrined right
as a human being
from The United States perspective.
But to create the situation where you train
kids every day that you might you know,
this, It's it's like the it's like the
the theater of going under your desk during
the atomic bomb thing. And I don't mean
to say that the things they may train
them today are theater because there are plenty
of ways I would argue that in some
of these circumstances, it probably does benefit the
kids to learn. My point, though, is not
I I look at it like this. I
think that the negative that comes along with
putting this in their brains and and fear
mongering about this is which is how it
feels to these kids. I've spoken to some
about it.
Versus
having people there to protect them and not
having to deal with this, despite that they
might gain from learn I think it's much
better, the the four the latter. I really
do. But even that, people will disagree with.
The kids to help them be safe. Yeah.
But I would also say as a first
responder,
when you're at scene and you have three,
four hundred kids at a school, it can
be very chaotic for the first responders because
you have parents intervening. Parents are trying to
get into the school and wanna protect their
children, of course, and the ship. DHS secretary
Kristi Noem,
said the following here, wrote it on x,
Nicole, to you. This deranged monster targeted our
most vulnerable, young children praying in their first
morning mass of the school year. This deeply
sick murderer scrawled the words for the children,
where is God, and killed Donald Trump on
a rifle magazine. I mean, the whole thing
is we're also learning now there was some
antisemitism
in some of these writings, Nicole. And the
question is, does the hatred for Trump and
Christians kinda play into this investigation?
Absolutely. It plays into this investigation.
This was part of his motive. This was
part of his grievance. I mean, this is
I'm sorry. I can't just stop. Like, is
this guy literally, like, trying to give his
best, like, villain perspective?
For the podcast, you got it's like this
he's got this he just has this weird
stare about him. I mean, it's not like
I'm just trying to pick him out. I
just like, I'm trying to listen, and I
can't stop looking at the way Gideon looks
right now. He's, like, giving you, like, the
death stare with his weird little tripod hand
thing he's doing. I just think that's weird.
I mean, I it's a it's this it's
it's the
the
impression is the wrong word. It's the it's
the feeling I get, though, from a lot
of these peep you watch them on these
shows, these deranged kind of Zionist perspectives. And
I'm not even saying that's I I do
think that's where he comes from, but the
point is that you get the same kind
of feeling. I I think it comes from,
like, a sociopathic kind of thing, my personal
opinion. But just look it it was a
personal point. I just think it's interesting. I'm,
like, laughing to myself. I'm, like, why can't
I stop looking at him? He's, like, staring
you down, like, into your soul.
Words for the children, where is God, and
kill Donald Trump on a rifle magazine.
I mean, the whole thing is we're also
learning now there was some antisemitism
in some of these writings, Nicole. And the
question is, does the hatred for Trump and
Christians kinda play into this investigation?
Absolutely. It plays into this investigation.
This was part of his motive. This was
part of his grievance. I mean, this is
a sick individual.
And in research that I was doing prior
to coming onto your program, he wanted to
target someone like president Trump, Elon Musk, some
sort of executive,
and he spoke very specifically as far as
targeting children.
He said, I wanna go in where there
won't be any parents, and I wanna kill
as long as I can. And I don't
even wanna say the words that he said
on your program because it is so disgusting
and evil. And I can tell you that
we have to get to the bottom of
this, and I have such respect for what
Aaron Cohen is doing because if we can
detect this in advance and we can identify
who these individuals are All it's about. And
hopefully, we can stop these shootings from happening
at the rate that they're occurring. Stop them
before
they happen. Not stop them, but stop them
before they happen. That's what they're talking about,
which you already know. I just think it's
an interesting way for them to carry this
forward. It always comes back to that point.
And, of course, you know, these things
are very there's something something about this is
clearly off
in a lot of different ways. But I
think we've already gone over that for the
most part, but I think what's weird about
this is this overfocus
on the long term policy, which is always
what they do,
which is why we often point out. It
doesn't have to be something that is always
manufactured entirely or fake, which is something you
shouldn't be afraid to question.
Many times, it's just something that is used,
but it doesn't also mean there's not so
other connected points. Right? Like like, you could
even just take for sake of conversation the
idea of the antidepressants that our case is
looking into. I very much think there's a
there is a overlapping point to these kind
of things. And on top of that, you
could talk about any number of like, you
know, how about just the idea of the
way that social media is, like, warping people's
brains or the warmongering state of just non
stop war and murder and genocide, but it's
okay. It's good. It's power. We're okay. We're
right. We're winning. You know? Those things have
an effect.
But I I do think it's more than
that. In our country. It is unacceptable what
we're seeing right now. We cannot maintain shootings
at this level and at this pace. It
is violent. It is disgusting. And for them
to target children in the most vulnerable spot
at a church
is wrong. And the common denominator seems to
be mental health in all of these things
that I've covered for twenty seven years, Erin.
I mean, are you surprised the shooter did
not go inside the church and went outside
the church and opened fire? No. He he
wanted to do as much damage in the
shortest period of time. And if he was
outside or outside of a window from the
tactical perspective, he's able to engage. He's got
cover. He can dump rounds. He's got an
AR there. I saw
a dozen magazines in that, video manifesto that
he posted. I understand there was something on
Reddit also. But, Trace, I wanna say this.
What's more important to me than these manifestos,
which we're all great at finding after
after the fact Right. The big deal here
with this AI where we need to get
with law enforcement and why I'm so obsessive
about getting this thing out Mhmm. I'm less
concerned about the manifesto. I'm more concerned
about who these guys are becoming. They all
start in that yellow, that basic grievance. Yeah.
But once that starts to escalate into targeting
language,
into, tactical
planning, like we saw in the manifesto,
how do we get those breadcrumbs before we
catch that shooter?
America's gotta catch up, and it's gotta happen
quick. We're ten years behind. But I think
we can do it. It's just it's time
to hit the gas. You what would you
add to that, Lieutenant? Because it's a good
point here, but, you know You've heard this
before. Right? I think it was Elizabeth Newman,
I think, was her name. Whitney and I
talked about this a long time ago during
a Russian special. Right? We see it building.
We just don't know how to stop it.
Right? Remember that whole thing? Again, the whole
presentation about people who were, you know, domestic
domestic terrorists,
who were who were
who knew how to operate and were, you
know, were basically doing
were, like, staying just under the radar. My
point was, oh, so what you're saying is
they're not breaking the law? Okay. So what
they were arguing is we need to alter
these things from, you know, their their rights.
They're using their rights to hide behind.
There was an impassioned call for getting rid
of your constitutional rights because they knew how
to operate within them, and then they would
go, shoot.
So that was a very tricky way, a
manipulative way of saying that they weren't breaking
the law. So we had to do something
to make sure that what they're currently doing
is breaking
the law so we can stop them before
they do the thing that we tell you
they're gonna do. That's exactly what we're that's
it it's
obviously part of this.
All around this, you can feel like and,
again, let's just even say,
Gideon, the program, and Cohen behind it have,
you know, he has good intentions, whatever that
looks like.
This would put in the hands of the
same people who were lying about immigration. This
would be put in the same hands of
the people like like Matthew Miller, the ones
that are, like, this lazy lidded sociopath
who were out there doing things
that are not in the interest of this
country.
So many which ways we could talk about
that guy. He just is a special kind
of sociopath to me. But it'll be put
in the same hands of the people that
force COVID shots on you. The same hands
of the people that force woke ideology on
you. The same hands of the people that
put left and right
who created the things that we live under.
And we wanna allow them this kind of
power.
Well, guess what? It's not your choice right
now. They're not asking you. They're doing it.
Why?
Because we live in emergency governance. Right? Whether
that means declare an emergency or just say
bad thing happened, therefore, we don't have time.
Hurry.
Just like COVID and all the rest.
Oops. Sorry. I had to wait down here.
So that's the video.
Some of it, we can get into more.
But here's one more clip from, it's kind
of I think this was the same this
one I think we got
oh, you know what's interesting about this, actually?
So this I believe this was an earlier
one.
So here is another clip. This this guy
shared this Vox Veritas. I don't think people
are paying close enough attention. He's flat out
saying we're going to be able to stop
you before you do anything based on antisemitic
posts. Here's that clip.
Oh, and Gideon AI trailer. Let's play it
very quickly.
Gideon is the first real time AI system
built to detect threats online
before they become attacks.
Anonymous networks flagging behavior
predicting
danger.
We don't get a second chance. Did you
get that part?
Anonymous
networks
flagging behavior.
You know who that is? Yeah. All the
Israeli bots and all the things we're talking
about. That's what we're dealing with here, guys.
That's not even secret.
The the these are the these are the
in the group like, the CHEQs and the
authentics. That's what we're dealing with. This is
like some all encompassing shift in power. We
key everywhere you look.
Every single place you look in this conversation,
you're finding Zionism,
globalism, technocracy,
converging, and becoming some all encompassing
everywhere.
I just it's not my opinion at this
point. You can literally see all of these
massive things shifting.
Half the Republican party seems to be concerned
about Israel's influence over our government right now.
I just don't know why this is not,
like I I don't I I guess the
question is why it hasn't shifted yet.
What does that mean? I don't even know.
How is how it mean unless that means
that
it's all the people that see it, but
none of the power structure cares. That would
make sense to me. But we see it.
Let's not miss the next one.
Fifteen seconds, Aaron. You're talking about stopping mass
shootings, attacks in Boulder before they start. Trace,
I'm building the first AI driven threat prediction
platform platform for law enforcement. They're flying blind
right now. I've got an elite team of
engineers
from Palantir. I've got law enforcement agencies lined
up. 76%
of these mass attackers
posted some type of grievance online. This is
America's early warning detection system. If you're a
chief out there, reach out to me and
get on my pilot. And if you're a
VC,
I'm about to open my seed round, partner
with Yeah. Give him billions of dollars. Right?
There's no weirdness there. He's part of the
government. He's not. Who cares? Right? Just dump
some money on it. Give him government control.
No big deal.
And let's make America safe. They're gonna get
cops the tools they need. Now realize this
is an older clip. So here's what's really
weird to me.
He's
this to me shows you the kind of
coordination of this, where you haven't come on
with a rabbi. What a coincidence.
Talk about this before.
Push the idea with Palantir's team. No big
deal there. Right? The same people we're seeing
in every possible situation.
Then this happens. Now
comes back on, rolls it out.
I think it's very clear what's happening.
As Clayton Morris says, looks like Whitney Webb
was right again.
Here comes the surveillance state to make us
all safe, in quotes, it should be, by
monitoring every move we make,
all triggered by a mass tragic event. Who
could have guessed?
He's right.
That's the clip we played earlier. I mean,
can't you can just see the coordination of
this. He's on his he's giving these little
two minute advertisements about this and building and
all. And then this this event happens that
seems to almost have been, like, ready for
it, the way this all rolled out. 12
agencies, 2,700 people, Palantir's team.
And he was just on there talking about
it with a rabbi. I mean, come on.
The I the odds of all of this
feels hard to place.
But this becomes more interesting, and I I
get the sense that Melania was told to
put this out because it would be uncomfortable
for some one of them to do it.
August 28. Caroline Levitt says, first lady Melania
Trump calls for preemptive
intervention
in identifying potential shooters school shooters. Now here's
an interesting overlap, by the way.
Oh, come on. It was
damn.
It was the rapid response teams. Let's do
here we go. Here's one of them at
the very least. There's two of them. I
think this is the old the newer one.
It's about the rack the reaction forces. Right?
Yeah. Here it is. Pentagon plan and the
other one was Trump's executive order, which made
it the reality. Pentagon plan would create military
reaction force
for civil unrest. And what's one example of
civil unrest even the Washington Post gives? Protests.
Clearly. Because protesting, which is your protected right,
is now civil unrest, which means simply doing
that, as Trump has recently said on LA,
if you protest, you'll be met with very
c very serious force, or something like that.
Paraphrasing. I can't remember this. With force is
his point. There was an adjective I can't
remember.
So your protesting is now the problem. Now
that's diff the point I'm making here is
that we're talking about a reaction force. Right?
Okay. So here, she's talking about a preemptive
intervention.
See? What so what it's all the same
conversation. So now you got National Guard military
deployed multiple places around the country, ready to
react on the on the fly based on
anything. Now you're gonna fold into that an
AI monitoring system, by the way, which Palantir
has already built out. Totally separate thing, though.
Wink. Wink.
And we are going to discuss the idea
of them deploying preemptive
intervention intervention military teams
with the whole giddy and AI overlap who
are gonna be there and tell you to
stop before you do it. I mean, how
do you not see this all connecting? All
these different parts are what we've been warning
about coming into view together.
That's my opinion anyway. Here's what Melania said.
I'm gonna include this for you.
This is why I'm so frustrated seeing all
the mains from alternative media try to couch
this on one thing when the reality is
it's obvious what this connects back to. I
mean, even though you can see them like
Jones pointing out the Israel overlap to Gideon,
that's clearly there.
But is it really the full picture? And
on top of that, I think it's obvious
now. It's really hard to ignore. Those of
us that have been screaming about this invasion
discussion for a long time are now being
vindicated by any number of other points. But
if you're only giving it the one like,
at the end of the day, if you
try to make this about people going after
Trump, you're missing the point
entirely.
But as I said, Melania Trump,
she's talking about the precrime direction and why
it's necessary based on the shooting. And I
said, how long have we been warning about
this? Today, while those lost in TeamSport politics
are out there obediently trying to link this
back to only one side of the whole
of government problem, we'll be continuing to call
out all of it and what it's what
it's building.
I've said tea lab coming deal daily wrap
up coming in an hour. And this is
actually what Casey pointed. People like Ryan and
Whitney have been right for so long. This
is actually really frustratingly true, by the way,
and a lot of us are in this
IMA, a lot of us are in this
category.
That we've been writing about this or many
other things for so long that people forget
about it. They forget that we even brought
it up. Then they have to ex we
we have to explain it all over again
what people think they stole it from a
random TikToker who saw you know, who repeats
the things we've been saying for four years,
who stole it from us in the first
place. Sadly, that is constantly what happens, but,
you know, there is a detriment to being
that far ahead of a story. Here's what
Melania said.
The tragic mass killing in Minnesota illuminates the
need for preemptive
intervention.
Like it's just some random idea she had.
No. No. This has been planned. In identifying
potential school shooters. We'll get into it in
a second. That's just exactly what Trump said
we needed back in his last administration.
Early warning signs are often evident, with many
individuals exhibiting concerning behaviors and making violent threats
online prior to their actions.
Okay. Well, let me ask you this. Let's
say somebody makes an online threat,
okay, but never intended to go through with
it because they're a coward.
Should they be arrested for the crime?
Is it a crime to you know, I
mean, like, this is the point we were
just making.
Well, it's not gonna matter anymore if they
just you know, especially especially if you are
saying it in regard to Israel or something
like that or, you know, whatever they don't
like or whatever Trump said that day or
whatever the president doesn't like. But it goes
on to say,
the to prevent future tragedies, it is crucial
we look into behavioral threat assessments,
Orwellian
term, across all levels of society, meaning you're
all gonna be watched, beginning in our homes,
of course. Right? In your home. Thank you,
Amazon Echo. It's already happening. It's,
extending through school districts and, of course, of
course,
social media platforms, which is already happening. See?
All of this is already there. They're just
dry they're hoping to drive in their MAGA
supporters to going to calling for what they
already know they're doing.
And it says,
being aware of these warning signs and acting
quickly can save lives and make America community
safer. See something, say something.
Yeah. Right? Even here's Brad Miller. Hope people
realize what's meant by behavioral threat assessments. We're
on the march toward technocracy.
He gets it.
Here's
Yusuf.
Even the first lady promoting Gideon pre crime.
The Zionist police state is here.
True. True enough.
True Street Media says tried to read all
this, but all I got was problem reaction
solution to bring in an AI precrime surveillance
state. Behavioral threat assessments beginning in our homes
is such an Orwellian anti Fourth Amendment touch.
But, guys, as I said as I said
with the flag point, any and yet all
the fake patriots
cheer.
If you're not fake and you believe in
the constitution and you recognize this feels wrong,
then say it. Call it out. So I
know you're the majority out there. I know
it.
Brad, same thing. Oh, this is what he
basically said underneath that. I hope enough Americans
can read between the lines as to what
is meant by that. It's technocracy.
Now here's what Whitney Webb said in regard
to the same post.
I've warned about the precrime push to stop
mass shootings before they happen for years. She
has.
Especially during the last Trump administration.
I don't think it's a coincidence that this
happens just as the full extent of the
Epstein Teal carbine nine one one relationship is
being revealed. We'll touch on that too, by
the way.
Right here.
And these are these emails that are coming
out, which if you already follow this platform,
if you follow Whitney's platform, if you read
articles like this one,
Right? Car The Prince and the Spy or
this one. How the CIA and Mossad and
the FD network are exploiting mass shootings to
create Orwellian nightmare for Mint Press News Whitney
from 02/2019. Then you already know all of
this. If you watch this, discuss this, you
already know all of this. We've been talking
about carbine nine one one, but it's now
just carbine for a long time. And so
her point is that the the timing of
all this now to be you know, it
it's all coming out. How all of these
things tie together just like she's been telling
you. She says, I wrote about Epstein,
Teal, and Carbine, as well as Trump's previous
precrime push after a spat in 2,019
mass shootings, which then AG William Barr, who
launched the DOJ precrime program called DEEP, d
e p d e e p d e
e p,
seemed to predict in an odd speech together
in the same article. She put that together.
Check it out below and don't fall for
the trade the latest tragedy being used to
coerce you into signing away your remaining freedoms
to precrines your failing state. I completely agree
except for the fact that they're not asking
to sign anything. They're just doing it, and
they don't care what you have to say.
That's the point.
So let's go through this. Some points that
stand out. And believe me, read this entire
article, as well as all the ones we're
gonna point to. This this year, there's so
much information that we're not gonna highlight in
this quick overview.
But so this is 02/2019,
how the CIA, Mossad, and the Epstein network
are exploiting mass shootings to create an Orwellian
nightmare.
Remember, this is his first administration. So there
was Peter Thiel. There's Uhud Barak. There's Epstein.
There's all the interlock overlapping connections.
Another funder of Carbine, Peter Thiel, which we've
mentioned before but that's relevant now with where
this goes,
has his own company that, like Carbine,
is set to profit from the Trump administration's
proposed high-tech solutions to mass shootings. So imagine
if they were primed to profit then, god
only knows how they're primed to profit now
seeing as how they are like a tick
embedded in this they're puppeteering this administration.
You know, that's my opinion. I mean, obviously,
I think that's obvious that they're shockingly involved.
My point is that clearly, they are going
to be benefiting from every single thing that's
happening, especially if it has to do with
their surveillance network. And so that only
especially how you heard that Palantir is part
of Gideon.
Their team is what's helping make this happen.
All over the place, man.
It says, indeed, after the the recent shootings
in El Paso, Texas, Donald Trump, who received
political donations from and
how do I read that weird? After the
recent shooting in El Paso, president Trump, who
received political donations from and has been advised
by Thiel, followed his election.
Asked the tech the companies to, quote, detect
mass shootings before they strike. That's what he
said. That's a direct quote. A service already
perfected by Thiel's company, Palantir. This is back
in 02/2019,
guys,
which was which has developed precrime software.
They're just waiting to roll this out. Already
in use through the country. Palantir is also
a contractor for The US intelligence community and
also has a branch based in Israel. So
Palantir has its own Israel created AI,
you know, precrime
surveillance network. Now they've already rolled out their
surveillance network,
but Palantir, for some reason, broke off and
helped Gideon build this thing, and now Gideon's
doing it, or is it all just the
same thing and it's a shell game of
who's involved and how it looks when they
present it to you? I mean, you they
already have this ready. So the idea that
this overlaps from some Israeli agent who creates
this thing and Halantir just happens to create
it, I am just pointing out the obvious
overlaps. Maybe that's just the way it worked.
Either way, they're all interconnected.
My point is I think it's clearly just
the same people moving things around to make
it look different to you
and branched in Israel regardless. And it says,
perhaps most disturbing of all, when whatever technology
solution is adopted by the Trump administration,
it is set to use a controversial database
first developed as part of a secretive US
government program
that involves
notorious Iran contra figures like Oliver North as
a means of tracking and flagging potential American
dissidents
for increased surveillance and detention in the event
of a vaguely defined national emergency.
Right. It's amazing how relevant this is today.
They're talking about main core, but, you know,
the continent of government overlap.
And we're on these lists. I can almost
guarantee it. But so now you're overlapping this
with some AI precrime development, and this gets
especially more dark.
As this report will reveal in 02/2019, this
database, often referred to as main core, was
created with the involvement of Israeli intelligence.
Surprise, surprise. And Israel remained involved
from it's to this day, I'm in my
opinion,
years after it was developed and potentially to
the present.
It was also used by at least one
former CIA official on president Reagan's National Security
Council to blackmail members of Congress, congressional staffers,
and journalists, among others.
Sure sounds like something we've heard before, Blackmail
Network to put presidents in certain positions of
power. Right?
But either I I forget if I included
this or not.
There was the basically, there was a whole
thing that, I think it was Ian Carroll
was digging through and on some of this
information of these files and ultimately showed that,
and that this is relating this is coming
back to this, the email dump that we
got showing that that EOBAROC was discussing things
with Peter Thiel and was bringing up Epstein
and the overlap therein. They bring up things
like Clinton. They thing up thing they blew
up things like Bill Gates. But the point
is not about left and right. The the
presidency
at the time. They bring up the reality
that they are spying and have and exchanging
information about the president of The United States.
All it really speaks to, which it'll be
selectively played by people that wanna make it
about one side, is the Israeli government spying
on the American government.
And at this point, I think, controlling it.
That's what it feels like to me.
So that's just an example of all the
way back then of the same exact concept.
And it says, given recent reports and, again,
don't miss the point.
The main core was created with the involvement
of Israeli intelligence. A list of American dissidents
was created with Israeli help, if not by
Israel, using a Palantir connection even back in
Trump's first administration. That that was confused. I
wasn't talking about the point is that main
core Israeli intelligence jumping forward to Trump's last
administration. You have the overlap of Palantir and
the implementation of that.
It's, I again, I think which is there,
and this is their way of introducing you
to what's already being done.
It says, given reports given recent reports on
Trump administration's plan to create a new government
agency
to use advanced technology to identify
neurobehavioral
signs,
isn't that exactly what they just talked about,
of someone headed toward a violent explosive act
using data collected by consumer electronic devices, the
picture painted by a technology currently being promoted
and implemented under the guise of keeping Americans
safe is deeply Orwellian. In fact, it points
directly to the genesis of a far reaching
surveillance state far more extensive than anything yet
seen in American history, and it is being
jointly developed by individuals connected to both American
and Israeli intelligence.
It's what we're watching right now, guys,
and it's only worse. Now you but think
about, like, RFK's
health tracking system thing they rolled out with
all of with Microsoft, by the way, and
all the rest of Google.
And so they're and he said, we're gonna
give you your information that they have control
of. How much you wanna bet that ends
up being some kind of a control loop?
Right? Where you have information that you're supposed
to keep up on, and then you're like,
you know, it's it's all of this is
about some kind of information controlled dynamic. It's
very obvious to me.
She goes over carbine.
We'll read more about the second.
Now it says Mint Press' recent series on
Jeffrey Epstein scandal noted in detail Epstein's ties
to CIA and Mossad intelligence, which you should
know by now despite them trying to pull
that away.
And it says such as Agnon Khashoggi, CIA
front companies such as Southern Air Transport and
organized crime through his close associations with Leslie
Wux,
Leslie Wexner.
In addition, Epstein's longtime girlfriend and alleged madam,
Ghislaine Maxwell, has family links to Israeli intelligence
through her father, Robert Maxwell, which you also
know. While it appears that Epstein may have
been working for more than one intelligence agency,
Zev, Shalab, former executive producer for CBS News
and journalist at Narrative,
without an
e, recently stated that he had independently
confirmed
with two unconnected sources, quote,
close connected closely connected to Epstein's story and
in a position to know that Epstein had
worked for Israeli military intelligence.
Again, you already know this if you're paying
attention. But so now we he's an FBI
informant. I think he clearly worked for this
an overlap of the CIA and Mossad, and
it's on the record in my opinion.
Notably, Epstein who was and my point in
all of this is to tie all this
together just to show you what this really
connects back to.
Epstein who was known for his interest in
obtaining blackmail through the sexual abuse of the
underage girls he exploited,
all which, again,
obvious connection, also claimed to have damaging information
on prominent figures in Silicon Valley. That's an
interesting overlap, by the way. So now we
have this massive, all encompassing, like, real time
monitoring surveillance apparatus that they claim is gonna
be stopping shootings but also just cataloging everything
on you that they might use against you.
Right? What you say, what you watch, your
porn habits, we're gonna use it against you.
You know, coming from a group that literally
collects blackmail data to use against you. But
no worries, though. They're only there for the
good reasons. Right?
And it says, in a conversation last year
with New York Times reporter James Stewart, Epstein
claimed
oh, wait. Sorry. I skipped a part. It
says,
the point was blackmail through the sexual abuse
of underage girls exploited, also claiming to have
damaging information on prominent figures in Silicon Valley.
Now think about that right now. Palantir and
how they all tie into this, they're seeming
like like interest in supporting whatever they do
even in the, like, in the face. Look,
Limiter's response when he was asked about the
genocide in Palantir.
His sweating and his stumbling words, maybe it's
because he can't say anything bad about it,
or anybody else, or this massive, like, technocratic
shift into the all that we're talking about,
the AI direction, Zionism,
genocide.
It's kind of a weird collaboration.
Maybe there's more to it. The point is
you can see there clearly that he's referencing
damaging information on prominent, without naming them, Silicon
Valley people. In a conversation last year, remember
this would be 02/2018,
with the New York Times reporter James Stewart,
Epstein claimed to have, quote, potentially
damaging or embarrassing information on Silicon Valley's elite.
That sounds like a hole.
And told Stewart that these top figures in
the American tech industry, quote, were hedonistic
and regular users of recreational drugs.
Now think Elon Musk and his weirdness around
all of this. I mean, it's very clear
that this all interconnects, guys. That's what I've
been trying to show you the entire time.
Epstein
also told Stewart that he had, quote, witnessed
prominent tech figures taking drugs and arranging for
sex and claimed to know, quote, details about
their supposed sexual proclivities.
That's what we're talking about with this network
and how they can use that and clearly,
I think, driven to this very point. With
despite everyone's awareness of what Israel's doing, they
somehow still are able to hold the reins.
In the lead up to his recent arrest,
Jeffrey Epstein appeared, this is 2019 again, to
have been attempting to rebrand as a tech
investor. Now think about that. Think about had
he had not been, for whatever reason, exposed,
called out by the very you know, because,
I think, independent media,
and had worked his way into the Silicon
Valley elites. And then this all took place
with Jeffrey Epstein leading the way
without you knowing on the rough surface that
he was who he was.
That's what he was doing.
Ask yourself why. Now what what you're watching,
remember, he was a part of these massive
tech directions and the gen the genetics or,
eugenics aspect of it.
So think about that with what's happening now
and ask yourself whether there's just some new
person in that role.
Attempting to rebrand as a tech investor
as he had done interviews with several journalists,
including Stewart, about technology investing in the months
before he was hit with federal sex trafficking
charges.
Last year, 02/2018, Epstein claim claimed to be
advising Tesla and Elon Musk, we forget about
that, who had previously photographed with Epstein's madame,
Ghislaine Maxwell, right there beneath you. A few
years ago, Epstein also attended a dinner hosted
by LinkedIn's Reid Hoffman,
where Musk had allegedly introduced Epstein to Mark
Zuckerberg. Google's Sergey Brin is known for a
to have to have attended a dinner hosted
by Epstein at his New York residence where
Donald Trump was also in attendance.
See, this is my it's all of them,
guys.
That's what I think, anyway. I think the
evidence is pretty clear that they're all largely
compromised in one way or another, and none
of them want this to come out. But
it's a game of finger pointing. Even, you
know, Elon Musk going, maybe because you're on
the list might have been him making it
sound like he wasn't. You know? It's it's
interesting.
As will be noted in a later report,
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to whom all
of Israel's intelligence agencies answered by virtue of
his position, has stated on more than one
occasion that the acquisition of Israeli intelligence linked
startups by foreign tech giants,
especially in the Silicon Valley, is a current
and deliberate policy of the state of Israel.
We've said this so many times, and I'll
cite this again in the next article just
where Whitney made the reference to it.
The obvious reality is Israel has
expanded its intelligence operations into startup companies
on the surface. And but if, you know,
try to hide, like, oh, they're ex
Israeli, you know, intelligence, but they state they
state publicly that they're acting in the interest
of the Israeli government. And many of them
aren't x anything. Authentix, Ollie, CHEQ, all these
entities that are immersed in
US engagement or,
you know, the TeleMessage app they're using in
the White House right now. All these things
are relaying data back to Israeli government.
It's in it's wild how obvious all this
is. Carbine's ties to US intelligence.
Now it says, while Epstein and Barack are
two financiers of car car
carbine. Excuse me. Those ties to intelligence are
clearest.
Excuse me. I messed the sentence up. While
Epstein and Barack, Ehud Barak,
former prime minister of Israel, are the two
financiers
of Carbine
whose ties to intelligence are clearest, another funder
of Carbine,
Peter Thiel.
Shock is surprising. Has ties to US intelligence
and a history of investing in other companies
founded by former members of the unit eighty
two hundred. That's Israeli intelligence.
Thiel is co Thiel cofounded and still owns
a controlling sake of the company Palantir, which
you know now. Everyone knows now, but it
was less known at that point, which was
initially funded with a $2,000,000 investment from CIA
venture capital fund In Q Tel and quickly
thereafter became a contractor for the CIA.
After the success of its contract with the
CIA, Palantir became a contractor for a variety
of federal agencies, including FBI, defense of the
DIA, the s NSA,
DHS,
and the Military Special Operations Command, among others.
Last year, 02/2018, it won a contract to
create a new battlefield
intelligence system
for the US army. Palantir is also in
demand for its pre crime technology, which has
been used by several US police departments according
to The Guardian. Palantir tracks everyone from potential
terrorist suspects to corporate fraudsters, trial traffickers, and
what they refer to as sub okay. So
guess what? They've been watching this country a
long time. So when they rolled this out,
they they were this is what consolidation and
in and, like, the I think the like,
the last show dropping about what they did
with the information, Palantir, AI. The point is
they've been doing it a long time and
have been watching a long time with Israel
either leading the charge or right behind them
in the wings the whole time.
Now Carbine, remember, was about and Carbon nine
one one is about 911 call centers. As
Whitney's discussed, whether it's, like, dams and and
medical infrastructure, hospitals, things that are clearly now
connected to Israel's ability to shut them down,
to cause you know, or they're cyber manipulation,
which we didn't need to be a part
of it, but makes it much easier when
they're involved.
So we've talked about this. 911 call centers,
seriously, being outsourced to an Israeli intelligence company?
And on top of that, as she reports
in the other article that they're keeping track
of, they're monitoring and storing the information of
what you say and what's going on.
Over the top.
I think that was generally there's so much
in this article that you should read. It's
a very important article.
Make sure I didn't miss something here. There
was
yeah. Okay. That's what I read.
So here is the article she wrote called
the prince and the spy. When he wrote
this for T Lab in 2023.
Now there was a it's a many, many
overlapping points about Israeli spy, was her name
Hesham, I think.
It's her right there. And and the use
of Eric Prince is sort of like a
cutout American to to pretend like this was
an American company even though it's an Israeli
company. Apparently, all we need is one element,
the person to claim it's not, you know,
foreign. And Conframe Solutions, we talked about Carbon
nine one one. She mentioned a few of
them in here. Conframe was the one we
the main point, I think. But the part
I wanna read this for, and you could
I've gone over this many times.
The I it's just it's so he she
actually references this the fake phone he heard
to put out. The MAGA phone was turned
up and made in China with Israeli tech,
you know, literally spied on through Israeli intelligence.
It was very easy to prove.
Or the other phone they tried to roll
out, which very quickly got shown to be
built in other places in China. It's kinda
where'd that go? Like, they're lying to you.
Every day, there's a new grift about selling
the MAGA team. How do you not feel
like you're just being played all the time?
And that's not to say that MAGA itself
is wrong. I believe that most people in
that movement believe that they want right for
this country. You just start listening to people
that don't care about you. You're letting people
lead you in a wrong direction because the
team.
But this is important about the company overlap.
And the actual article is right here
that she cites it from.
Ctech, Israel blurs the line
between defense apparatus and local security hub,
Says, Black Cube was specifically outed as an
Israeli intelligence front. Remember that? That was the
one that Weinstein used to ass to harass
the people that he raped.
Apparently, it's apparently no big deal. We can
keep letting this Mossad.
It's what they're Mossad agents, guys. I mean,
it's just you in and they were working
with somebody like that. You know, it's like
you and not not that ever nothing changed.
Is BlockCube still out there? But it goes
on to say, in this article we just
referenced,
the same article also contains the stunning revelation
that many Israeli companies, including Black Cube, have
been founded as fronts for Israeli intelligence operations
since at least 02/2012.
It states that in 02/2012, cyber this is
a quote. Cyber related and intelligence projects that
were previously carried out in house in the
Israeli military and the Israeli and Israel's main
intelligence arms are transferred to the companies that
in some cases were built for this exact
purpose.
The article also states, in some cases, managers
of development projects in the Israeli military and
intelligence arms were encouraged to form their own
companies, which then took over the military or
intelligence project.
Welcome to Gideon, guys. What do you think
it is?
You're this country is being openly
infiltrated by a foreign power
or already has been, and this is just
them making that more clear. This is an
interview we did with Whitney Webb, CIA Mossad
linked surveillance systems quietly installed throughout The United
States 2023.
Here's the article we were referencing.
CIA Mossad linked surveillance systems quietly installed throughout
The US 2023.
This is talking about Gabriel.
Like, you're not you can't miss Gideon, Gabriel,
all these same overlapping points that are very
it's obvious what they're pointing to. And it
says launched in 2016
launched in 2016 in response to a Tel
Aviv shooting
and the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando.
Funny how those overlap.
Gabriel offers a suite of surveillance products for
security and safety incidents at so called soft
targets and communal spaces, including schools, community centers,
synagogues, churches. The company makes the lofty promise
that the its products stop mass shootings according
to a 2018 report on Gabri
report on Gabriel published in the Jerusalem Post.
There were an estimated 475,000
soft targets across The United States,
meaning that the potential market for Gabriel is
huge, they said.
Gabriel says its founding has been backed by
an impressive group of leaders, the quote says,
mainly former leaders of Mossad, Shin Bet, Israel's
domestic intelligence agency, FBI, CIA,
largely the former, obviously. In recent years, even
more former leaders of Israeli and American intelligence
agencies have found their way into onto Gabriel's
advisory board and have promoted the company's products.
So something rolling out to it's the same
it's a precursor to what we're seeing today,
very clearly, with Israeli intelligence packed into it,
even though it's rolled out with per in,
you know, sensitive information about Americans
in an in an, a place to be
able to absorb that.
While the adoption of the surveillance technology
was slower than expected in The United States,
to to to their frustration, I imagine, that
dramatically changed last year. Remember, this was 2023.
When an anonymous philanthropist,
named, you know, probably rhymes with
yeah. Whatever. Netanyahu
gave the company $1,000,000
to begin installing its products throughout schools, houses
of worship, and community centers throughout the country.
Does that seem weird?
An anonymous philanthropist gives the money that's needed
to install an Israeli surveillance platform, and it
says the same philanthropist, in quotes, has promised
to recruit others to match his donation with
ultimate goal of installing Gabriel's system in, quote,
every single synagogue, school, and campus community in
the country.
With the CIA, FBI, and the SOD backed
system now being installed throughout The United States
for free, in quotes, it is worth taking
a critical look at Gabriel and his products,
particularly the few the company's future vision
for its surveillance system. Perhaps unsurprisingly, much of
the company's future vision coincides with the vision
of the intelligence agencies backing it. Precrime, robotic
policing, biometric surveillance.
Here we are. This is a precursor to
what we're discussing.
As noted elsewhere on the company's website, Gabriel
is looking to expand far beyond schools and
houses of worship to retail stores, warehouses, data
centers, banks, all these other facilities it specifically
promotes its abnormal behavior detection capabilities. Yep. Exactly
like he was literally just telling you on
that Fox show. One example given in reference
to how its products might be used in
the banking sector states the following as an
abnormal behavior detection example. A group of people
are loitering in the ATM lobby. Cabrel's activated
in silent panic mode and sends alerts with
live video to the security operations
center on-site security team. Audio talk warnings begin
to broadcast in the lobby. Security arrives to
clear the scene.
A group of people are loitering in the
lobby.
Yes. Activate panic mode, clearly.
It's but the point is that we'll this
will be I the bar I argue,
never ending. Not activate. It'll be an always
on thing. That's what I argue this is
being built as.
It also benefits the implementation of the smart
city model.
We all know that if we're paying attention.
And the point is being rolled out through
Trump's administration,
which utilizes the Internet of Things and and
I would argue of nano things nano bio
things on top of everything and ubiquitous sensors
and cameras to harvest massive troves of data
that are then used to manage the service
delivery
with those services including the deployment of law
law enforcement. Guys, this is what they've already
done.
That's what I'm saying. All these little points
have been put out under the immigration guys,
under the guys that's stopping from people that
are voting that shouldn't or whatever the narrative
is, they've already all been put in place.
We were the we were over here doing
jumping jacks, going, look, look, Look. Look what
they're doing. And all the team sport politics,
people were screaming about how you hated Donald
Trump or whatever.
It says Netanyahu again outlined this policy a
year later in twenty nineteen CyberTech Conference in
Tel Aviv,
where he stated that Israel's emergence as one
of the top five cyberpowers
had required
allowing this combination of military intelligence,
academia,
and industry to cover it, to converge all
in one place.
And that this further acquired, allowing our our
graduates of the military intelligence units to merge
into companies with local partners and foreign partners.
It couldn't be more clear. They're literally implanting
intelligence into companies all over the world and
guess even worse, US government entities are, like,
cheering it on, largely because I think they're
already compromised, quite frankly. It's either way, it's
imagine if it was Chinese intelligence.
For the same reason, we wanna help you
build AI. Well, listen to even make it
anybody anybody else. The idea that you're putting
intelligence agents inside companies,
a child knows what that means.
This merging of military intelligence, academia, and industry
has also been openly acknowledged by former Mossad
director Tamir Pardot,
who started stated in 2017
that, quote, everyone in the Israeli cyber technology
sector is an alumni of either Israeli intelligence
like the Mossad or Israeli intelligence like unit
a two hundred.
Openly stating that everyone, his quote,
in this sector, cyber technology, that's that's the
Silicon Valley.
From Israelis' perspective, they're all either alumni from
is in Bassad or unit a two hundred,
which
it's it's obvious. It's like a running joke.
You look and you own. Yes. It's like
you find something that ties back to Israel
and you look, oh, Surdof, a unit 8200
right there. Either veteran, alumni, or currently serving.
It's in your face.
So all of this ends up overlapping with
this idea that they are shoving these people
into these positions. They're relaying this information back,
spying on Americans and doing whatever they want
with it, and no one seems to care
about this. No one sees this as a
problem.
You know, and then pointing out that they're
just
gleefully chilling, you know, starving children to death
and using AI to kill people who are
trying to feed themselves. I feel like that's
a relevant point regardless of the political overlap
to it, clearly.
Does Pardo even win as far as to
say that the Mossad itself is like a
start up? His quote.
So this is this is one of those
moments where they literally say the thing, and
then when you say the thing that they
say, you're racist,
it's it's just it's right on the surface.
Pardo would know, she writes, after leaving his
post in as Mossad director in 2016, the
reason one that started this stated this,
he dove straight into the world of Israeli
tech startups, becoming chairman of CEPIOS Systems,
whose two CEOs are former unit eighty two
hundred officers. CEPIOS Systems' advisory board includes the
former chief information security officer of the CIA,
Robert Binglin, and former head of Israeli National
Cyber Bureau and veteran of Israeli intelligence, Rami
f,
Ifrat.
Sepio systems cybersecurity
software has been adopted by several banks, telecom,
insurance companies, including US and Brazil. That's Whitney's
point.
Yes. Banks, telecom,
dams, water infrastructure, medical infrastructure.
We are vulnerable guys, and it's obvious.
It's striking.
Now that we've established that numerous Israeli tech
focused companies are known to be operating as
fronts for intelligence,
the question arises of whether Gabriel is one
such company.
This is 2023,
guys.
Now remember, don't confuse Gabriel with Gideon, but
it's the same point. It's the same objective.
And I argue it's exactly the same thing.
While it is difficult to know for sure,
several companies that have been outed as fronts,
like such as the Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud
Barak connected carbine.
So realize that right now is being used
in this country.
Trump, Biden, they're all okay with it. Allowing
Israeli intelligence,
not a, like, an actual front that's now
been exposed to one, relaying 911 call centers.
That makes sense. Right?
Have been involved
involved in creating and implementing the necessary structure
for a precrime approach to law enforcement in
The United States. That's the larger point, that
they've been building this piece by piece with
different narratives, different arguments, different politicians, different left
right push. And here we are. At least
seems to be already, like
based on what he's saying, I clearly have
pointed out many times already that I think
it's already in there being used against you,
and this is their rationale for it. You
don't have 12 agencies and a whole staff
ready to go and Palantir building it. If
you I mean, I think you get the
point.
Gabriel's vision for a fully automated system that
can use predictive analytics on behave of human
behavior to stop crimes before they happen is
eerily similar to the same vision espoused by
carbine.
Before their ties to Epstein and Israeli intelligence
were outed very publicly in 2019.
So the idea,
2023,
she's basically laying out the exact narrative that
they're currently using to roll this out.
And there's a reason that people wanna try
to downplay what Whitney's doing. I think it
speaks for itself
because she's right.
Now she wrote this, by the way, in
2021.
Same overlapping point aimed more more about, like,
the domestic terrorism, but during Biden's administration.
Always showing you that we have the same
argument, the same
criticisms
regardless of what fake left and right thing
is in the in the White House, guys.
That's what's so frustrating of people that try
to pretend because all they can see is,
like, the last 30 of the news cycle,
somehow we're obsessed with Donald Trump. No. We
are angry with the government regardless of what
puppets in that place. We'll call out Biden
doing a genocide. We'll call out Trump doing
a genocide. We'll call out Biden doing precrime.
We'll call out Trump doing precrime. See, it
kills those people that when we do this
and our consistency and our principles make them
look like cartoons, when they're trying to do
that, trying to act like that's the problem.
That's why it's
clearly some large effort to make platforms like
ours just, like, as if we're not even
involved, dude. To their very large frustration,
we break through
anyway. Who is a terrorist in Biden's America?
For it says far from being a war
against white supremacy. They see and again, that
was simply the narrative. See, if you wanna
make it about woke eyed, you know, the
left and the they going after pronouns.
It was just the narrative
over the top that was used to go
after you, just like Trump continued with a
different narrative. And it says the Biden administration's
new domestic terror strategy clearly targets primarily those
who oppose US government overreach
and those who oppose capitalism and or globalization.
Exactly.
Read it for yourself.
Here, this is going back to 2020.
AI powered medical precrime is officially here to
fight COVID nineteen, and that overlaps with the
same stuff. Even with the Trump overlap, Bill
Barr, it's it's the same conversation because Adam,
this is what they were doing. They shift
this was Whitney and I talking about this,
or I think I was pointing to her
conversations. I think one of them with me,
but this is the show I did about
that shifting into the COVID nineteen era.
Twenty twenty, May.
Almost like we called it correctly.
This is 2019.
Trump's alarming speech paves way for precrime,
censorship, loss of rights, and US war focus
carries on.
This one goes back to 2016.
Police now using precrime algorithm to target and
label innocent citizens as criminals.
Right? So you can literally watch the consistency
go through bot go through Trump, to Biden,
to Trump. You know? Not like I need
to point that out to you guys, but
I just I think it's, it's an important
thing to think about
what consistency of, principles actually looks like.
Now,
Jason Basler,
who has it's a thread, by the way,
says The US just funded AI
that can ID you. We already mentioned this.
Right? The the low Earth orbit things. The
there's I think there's two terms for it.
Low Earth orbit satellite, then there was another,
like, another,
Greg Reese did a report on it, and
he used another term before that. I can't
remember what it was. But the same point,
they're like the the very low Earth orbit
satellites. There used to be a long place
that they weren't allowed to even though I
guarantee they did. Tell, you know, use, like,
a Google Earth kinda thing and actually be
close enough to look at your face. Well,
they have now funded AI or just can
expose that they're using it
that can ID you from a mile away,
from half a mile away. Oh, you know
what? I'm sorry. I I thought this was,
so both points. I thought he was talking
the what he's saying is they just funded
AI that can ID you from half a
mile away just by the way you walk.
So we're talking about the gate, what the
gate, monitoring, biometric monitoring, that kind of stuff
from half a mile away. But I think
this overlaps with the same point. It's nothing
that my mind went with it of the
low Earth orbit satellites that they have now
allowed to be able to actually look at
your face. Like, you, they can identify you
from space.
That's and we already this is what Greg
Reese just talked about. We talked about it
back with Elon Musk's
overlap
in regard to him helping the National Reconnaissance
Office build out the satellite spy network that
they were that was another precursor before Trump
got into power under Biden because, you know,
Elon's a pedophile deep state
collaborator, right? Because he worked with Biden's administration,
but then he went over to Trump's and
now he's a good guy, but now he
left, now he's a bad guy. All stupid.
The point is that he was working with
the US government to build out this spy
network. And that's the that's one of these
the the same point. But so adding to
that, using all this infrastructure,
AI funded that can I date ID you
from half a mile away by your gate?
And then the I ARPA's
Briar program, for for some reason, I have
a hard time saying that,
integrates your face, body, and even your walk
to track you through drones, see to CCTV,
day or night, even in crowds. The tech
is already being tested. No public oversight. That's
almost always how it goes.
Intelligence advanced research projects activities, like the DARPA
for this stuff. BRIER, biometric recognition and and
and identification
at altitude and range. Think DARPA, but for
the CIA, NSA.
Experts Warren Breyer could bypass city state facial
recognition bans. I they're so far past that
at this point. You think I mean, if
Trump doesn't care about the constitution you know,
I mean, it's not again, it's not about
one or the other. But that currently is
what's being used to roll this out. And
if he's disregarding your constitutional rights, which he
knows you care about,
nothing nothing is sacred at this point.
Few other overlapping points that I think are
irrelevant.
Sarah points out, hey. On August 27,
the combat antisemitism movement,
right before all this happened, launched a new
app called Report It, designed to help users
document antisemitic incidents in real time. Almost like
it's adding to the same direction.
Almost like it's coordinated. But behind the polished
interface lies a surveillance and influence network tied
to Israeli military who didn't see that coming.
It's not even secret, guys. That's a threat.
You can read on about it. I mean,
it's it's just these are they're coming at
you from every possible angle.
Some for different narratives, some for the same,
but, really, to me, it's all about the
one thing.
Canadians caught in the crossfire as US customs
searches of electronic devices
rise at the borders.
Right? Not certain people, not but in general,
have gone up,
22%
from down from what was it?
Where was it? I was just trying to
go quick.
A 23% over the last year. The point
is that it's up dramatically from the last
administration.
And all that means is they're rapidly searching
people's phones
through the border.
And it's and there are ways that it
says allowing officers to copy and analyze device
content.
Yeah. Who cares about your constitutional rights, you
know, because we're in the border the the
the constitutional right free zone, which is all
the ACLU ACLU has written about. It's all
around the country. The idea that they you
ever are required to hand over your personal
device, let alone give them access to it,
this is the police state we've lived in
for a long time. That's not just Donald
Trump. Same thing was happening to Biden, but
you can clearly see that Donald Trump has
ramped it up 23%
more.
Now this is an important
overlap,
you know, all,
what's the right word for it? She's updating
this periodically as new things come around.
Like a living document of the control grid.
From the Solari report, Trump administration, digital control
grid coming together at high
speed. And we're gonna talk about this again,
probably another IMA panel coming up soon. Quick
side note, I'm gonna be giving that presentation
I did. I turned into a show about
technocratic tiptoe. I'm gonna be giving that for
a legislative report that the Solari report is
gonna be doing that is gonna be put
in the hands of some policy makers, which
I think is important.
That's one that's I'm honored to do that
for.
This is a good overview of where this
goes, and this is what this is really
about, guys, the digital control grid.
But this is just the the the next
level. Right? The AI, precrime,
This the you know, digital ID, social credit,
all these different parts. The stablecoin,
you know, CBDC stablecoin version is another word
I was looking for. All these things are
happening.
It's all about this. So it's important to
think about this as it goes forward. We've
had many points about this. IMA, the encroachment
of the biodigital control grid and the Epstein
overlap.
We did one just called the fast approaching
digital control grid. That was a good episode.
I talked about this twenty twenty five January.
This is about Stargate and other things that
overlap. Stargate's just one more part of this
whole thing. Donald Trump rolls out the bio
AI biomedical control grid backed by Israel in
the deep state. Look at that. Exactly what's
happening. Now we also talked about the funding
arm of all this. One part of it
for the Freedom City, kind of Prospera,
maybe Washington DC overlap,
Pronomos Capital, which is the t one of
the teal funds
and the rapid transition to a techno feudal
state.
I think this is the one of the
important shows I've done right here. This is
an important one that shows you the bigger
picture, especially with, I think, the one of
the, like, in in,
the material changes on the ground of what
might become the technocratic state. That's kind of
the way I would see this, but we
have to watch that that may doesn't make
sense to you. But more of this is
important to see how all this comes together.
Each one of these moving parts is clearly
interconnected.
Now here are some clips that I really
wanted you to see that you've you've both
if you watch the show regularly, you've seen
both of these. This one, a little less.
Actually, the other one I'm gonna play first.
The first one, you've seen more. This one,
maybe a little less. Both of which I
think are very relevant to this conversation
and the mind control overlap or the, you
know, not well, that's what I'm gonna get
you next, but the
surveillance
precrime,
which then, in a really alarming way, overlaps
with the where the tech is going. Right?
See, I I couldn't this wouldn't do it
justice if I didn't at least point to
this. But the next show, most likely tomorrow,
I'm gonna go into more of this as
well as this this art this discussion I'm
gonna have one really quickly before we go
and wrap up some more points for you.
But this one you've seen, and I'm sorry
if you've seen it before, but important for
those who haven't, or even if you have,
to connect it with what this is. So
we're talking about AI
precrime. Right? Using artificial intelligence, algorithms, mass surveillance,
data mining, large language models to be able
to claim they can predict what you're gonna
do. Now, digital twins,
I guarantee you is a part of this.
I promise you that's a major part of
what they're doing, but that's something they don't
often wanna point to, I think.
The point overall is that this dovetails with
where the tech goes, right? So let's say
they've got this and you're thinking cameras, spy
devices. Okay. But what if their tech is
better?
What if there's smart dust?
That obviously would be used, right? That would
be something that would be utilized in that
pre crime dynamic, right? Okay. But let's say
you don't think smart does exist. Okay. Let's
talk about the Internet of nano things. Talk
about, internal devices. I mean, even a even
a,
certain implantable devices that are done for medical
procedures these days have outside Wi Fi connection
or whatever else. We know they're building more
of that.
Or what about the idea of
invasive surveillance type of things that are already
in existence about your brain?
Right? So let's say, hypothetically, they get to
a point to
where, either because you opt in in a
workspace or because it's just the way the
world exists where they can read your thoughts.
I know that sounds really crazy to some
people, but we're already there. That's the reality.
Not exactly at any point all the time.
I hope not. But overall,
it's about the idea of being able to
look into, you know, reach even let's just
even say your biometrics, your heart rate, for
example. Right? You just did your gait the
way you walk. What if your heart rate's
going too fast? Okay. All of this is
already there. I promise you. It will be
used to apply
a one more data point to a picture
they claim can decide whether or not you're
guilty.
So watch these videos and tell me this
is not a terrifying future for where they
all where we already are, by the way.
And now they're introducing a AI powered precrime
tool, which will access things just like this.
First off, a video.
It's gonna make you see the future and
understand a wonderful future where we can use
brainwaves to to fight crime, be more productive,
and find love. Now normally, I look this
you know, I'll she says it at the
end, and I think it's impactful. But since
you've already seen it and those that haven't,
I think the point in this case is
to know this first.
She she sets it up like that, but
she comes out at the end and says,
guess what? All of this is already here.
This is already in existence. We're already doing
this. So keep that in mind for the
point of today's show. This is already here.
Now whether it's rolled out in mass, done
secretly, whatever the point is, now that we're
rolling out this direction, this is what's coming
to.
Let's roll. And, again, already here. So keep
that in mind with where this goes. You're
in the zone.
Even you can't believe how productive you've been.
Your memo is finished. Your inbox is under
control, and you're feeling sharper than you have
in a decade.
Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your
favorite song,
sending chills up your spine as the music
begins to play.
You glance at the program running in the
background on your computer screen
and notice a now familiar sight that appears
whenever you're overloaded with pleasure,
Your theta brainwave activity decreasing
in the temporal regions of your brain.
You mentally move the cursor to the left
and scroll through your brain data over the
past few hours.
You can see your stress levels rising
as the deadline to finish your memo approached,
causing a peak in your beta brainwave activity
right before an alert popped up telling you
to take a brain break.
But what's that unusual change in your brain
activity when you're asleep?
It started earlier in the month.
You send a text message to your doctor
with a mental swipe of your cursor.
Could you take a quick look at my
brain data?
Anything to worry about?
Your mind starts to wander to the new
colleague on your team whom you know you
shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against
intra office romance.
But you can't help fantasizing
just a little.
But then you start to worry that your
boss will notice your amorous feelings
when she checks your brain activity and shift
your attention back to the present.
You breathe a sigh of relief when the
email she sends you later that day
congratulate you on your brain metrics from the
past quarter.
Now consider, a time in which, you know,
this is where we are, which again, we
already are.
And your brave way your brave your brain
waves
can be altered,
faked,
sabotaged.
I mean, we're talking about deep fakes and
whatever else. Like, okay. So now somebody frames
you for being about to commit a crime.
Good luck fighting that off,
especially when there's no way to prove you
know, you see where this goes. And I'm
just simply trying to give you the impression
for how frivolous this becomes regardless of how
accurate the tech is.
Which have earned you another performance bonus.
You head home jamming to the music with
your work issued brain sensing earbuds still in.
When you Which by the way, that patent
already exists and those and those buds, both
Apple and others, can be used to monitor
your brainwaves. That's a very clear patent. I've
showed it many times.
Yeah. This is where that comes into play.
Prior to work the next day, a somber
cloud has fallen over the office.
Along with emails,
text messages, and GPS location data,
the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from
the past year.
They have compelling evidence that one of your
coworkers
has committed massive wire fraud.
Now they're looking for his coconspirators.
You discover they are looking for synchronized
brain activity
between your coworker and the people he has
been working with.
While you know you're innocent of any crime,
you've been secretly working with him on a
new startup venture.
Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
You gotta love how they frame that as
the positive.
Right? And and, like, they want to scare
you almost. You know? They end with, like,
this,
I'm terrified even though I'm innocent. What a
weird way to frame that. What do you
think? Is it a future you're ready for?
You may be surprised to learn that it's
a future that has already arrived.
Everything in that video that you just saw
is based on technology that is already here
today. Mhmm. Art of just maybe not mass
rolled out into your grocery store. Right? But
it exists.
And I argue has been implemented, used, tested
on you probably for a long time, like
almost every other thing you can prove that
we're dealing with today. Artificial intelligence
has enabled advances
in decoding brain activity in ways that we
never before thought possible. This is artificial intelligence,
you said, is what has allowed this to
be possible. Yes. We know this now. Now
here's the next one. This one is a
little bit more obscure. It's it is connected
back to the same groups, the same conversations.
This is the one I've referenced in the
past about, like, the Wi Fi mapping of
your room and so on. But it is
about the brain this is the part about
the brain overlap as well.
This paper, the one that happened even after
this, which is already better, uses stable diffusion,
uses the thing that you use to make
art.
Like, what should a thing that you use
to make art have anything to do with
reading your brain? But, of course, it goes
further. So in this one, they said, can
they understand,
the inner monologue, the things you're saying to
yourself in your own mind? You see, this
is a step further. The other one is
simply brainwave monitoring in regard to how, you
know, arguably a level of the similar thing.
This goes to actually being able to relay,
like, explicit inner thoughts. Now we just showed
you that. There's a new report coming out
about how they were literally using tech, like
but interconnected tech, like wires and so on,
but to to be able
to report what people's inner monologue was saying.
Then, yes, I you should always question whether
may maybe they make it all up. Always
possible. But
if this is where it's going, which it
seems to be where they can already tell
you we've been,
obviously, this is a huge this is a
this is a much, much, much darker overlap
than what we just discussed with this added
to it, Sadly, which is where I think
this is already going. Mind you, by the
way, when you dream, your dream like, your
visual cortex runs in reverse, so your dreams
are no longer safe.
But we'll try this. So they had people
watch a video and just narrate what was
going on in the video in their mind.
So there's a woman, she gets hit in
the back, she falls over. This is what
the computer reconstructed the person thinking.
See a girl, looks just like me, get
hit in the back, and then she is
knocked off. Wow.
So look. You know what? That's why I
found that originally very interesting is because of
the overlap of the of the research of
Charles Lieber, Robert Langer, the idea of the
and and we talked about, for example, the
Rockefeller in study, the ferret nanotech stuff, where
not only was it able to influence the
way they moved and act, but it was
able to relay
data that came from the eyes.
It's exactly what they just showed you. Now
I don't know why I'm not even saying
it's the same. There could be another way
that they're doing this, but it's the same
point.
And so it's interesting to think about that
is that they're they're able to literally relate.
And so the real time conversation is about
whether that is could and is being done
in a large scale way as we did
with as they did with these mice without
some kind of wire running to it. It
was either magnetogenetics opt or magnetogenetics,
optogenetics, and other possible options out there.
So
this is here
in your face. Thoughts, like, are starting like
me get hit in the back and then
she is knocked off.
So our thoughts,
like, are starting to be decoded.
Yeah. Just think about what this means for
authoritarian states, for instance.
Or if you wanna generate images that maximally
activate your pleasure sensor, anything else. Okay. But
let's keep going. Right? To really get the
sense of the combinatorics of this. How about
can we go from Wi Fi radio signals,
you know, sort of like the Wi Fi
routers in your house, they're bouncing off radio
signals that work sort of like sonar.
Can you go from that to where human
beings are to images? So what they did
is they had,
you know, a camera looking at a space
with people in it, that's sort of like
coming in from one eye. The other eye
is the radio signals, so sonar from the
Wi Fi router. And they just learn to
predict,
like, this is where the human beings are.
Then they took away the camera. So all
the AI had was the language of radio
signals bouncing around a room, and
this is what they're able to reconstruct.
So what's interesting about that is what he
said is they view they they train the
model. Right? That's what they're doing with everything
today. So it wasn't able to do that
to start, but they gave it a camera,
and then they let it watch the way
that the wave bounced off everything, and then
it was able to basically be able to
then tell, based on the waves alone, where
the people were. And then going forward, now
this AI model is able to read the
the info that is sent back from the
Wi Fi router to tell you where people
are in the room. That's what we're talking
about. Then I I a great point that
Grande made here. He says, what's even more
insane is that even though they talk openly
about this, most people do not know that
it exists and would think that it's crazy
or ridiculous, he says. It's where we are.
You know, that we you try to you
still try to talk about people geoengineering
and people say you're crazy. It's like they
have programs
for it today. But that is a that's
a testament to the propaganda, the social engineering.
So I think it's really worth pointing out
the overlap to this, you know, where like,
it's I don't wanna say where it's going,
but if with the Gideon rolling out model,
if this is what they're already doing, if
not already rolled out in certain ways, it
takes it to a much more dystopian level.
Now this is 08/25/2025.
I'm gonna talk about this in the next
show, but just wanna point it out. Secure
wireless communication of brain computer interface
and mind control of smart devices
enabled by space time coding met metasurface.
And what this is, with read it. I'll
get into it later. But if you wanna
read it at at the end of the
show, it's Wi Fi or,
wireless.
So this is not some wire connected. This
is they are I'll show you this real
quick.
It's about people. So here you have
Alice in her wheelchair in a room
wanting to send or, you know, relay information
either to a person or a device
and being able to do so in a
way that is, they claim, secure,
not able to be intercepted by others because
of the the cryptography
encryption. Okay.
So first, you're talking about being able to
use your brain to control a smart device
without wires,
as always, the what's this big smoke and
mirrors are doing with what they're, you know,
the what they pretend they're doing right now.
But on top of that,
we're talking about information that's able to be
be intercepted. But, of course, they talk about
it being secure. But if you read it,
it makes it clear that it's complete not
entirely secure. It's kind of secure. But overall,
the way that this can be manipulated, like,
literally talks about how they can, you know,
intercept these things. So what if you get
to a point to where you're able to
intercept the relay of brain information? You know,
this gets so wild.
And this is news is what they're working
on. Like, this is the word the way
it's going. And I is that what I
don't think that's what we want.
It is our decision, ultimately. But we will
get into this more in the future, I
the the next show. But I think what's
interesting is just to consider
this topic, not as a future, but as
a now topic. That's what it really comes
down to. And whether or not that is
implemented with what we're discussing. You know what
I think.
Now last point, we already went over some
of this, but as Whitney says, interesting. This
is all popping off. Oh, first, this is,
Barrett Brown saying, one of the first people
to fly down to interview me upon my
release from prison was neckbeard Epstein, apologist
to Michael Tracy. That's perfect. Whose patron Glenn
Greenwald is still concealing his involvement with Epstein
associate Peter Thiel. Not sure what to make
of this.
Whitney says, interesting. This is all popping off
as my my 2019 reporting on Peter Thiel,
Epstein, and Ehud Barak, which we went over,
carbine nine one one was
just ultra vindicated by newly released emails.
So that's see, of course. And yet, nobody's
gonna swing back and go, she knew it.
They're gonna now point at it as if
it's fact without while standing on her shoulders
without giving her credit for it. That's mainstream
military media. That's what this always works.
But here's the article she pointed to, we
already read, and here's the report from Reason,
which goes over the emails, which you can
go through for yourself. I think it's important,
but you already know the bulk of what
we're discussing and what this shows you. The
interconnective of all of them, the connection to
the both eugenics, to the overlap of the
tech, but with Epstein interconnected between the two
of them, Barack and and Teal and, like,
trying to connect everybody. Like and and it's
just or as as in Carroll's pointing out,
the information that shows you that there's, like,
this relay of information about spying on I
mean, it's you guys know this. This is
just more of indication of what we've been
talking about for a very long time, and
that's what what he's saying. These emails just
simply vindicate what she was telling you. She's
right.
Now I'm not saying there's not nothing new.
There's a ton of information here. I haven't
even gone through you know, I've gone through
what I can't what I've looked through. Can't
can't even tell you what amount that would
be percentage wise, but I know I've already
and I've looked through what people have been
reporting on it. We'll continue to go through
this. I'm sure there's more information that I
think is important in there or that anybody
would.
But here's Israel Exposed saying, here's a link
to Eli Barak, so I can include it
for you. Emails, a 100,000
emails, where you can see him and Jeffrey
Epstein talking about meeting Peter Thiel, who owns
Palantir. But you know this largely because, well,
Eli Barak part wasn't included before, but we
already showed you about Thiel's many meetings with
Epstein, how Epstein funded him in more than
one way. And now we have the point
over that all overlaps with the Israeli government.
I mean, you just can't miss how all
of this picture is tied together.
Jay Wilderness
said Jeffrey Epstein
trying to get former Israeli prime minister, Ubirak,
to join him for a meeting with Peter
Thiel.
Look at that and the these are the
people that are
immersed in Donald Trump's administration. Oh, and by
the way, they'll let Maxine off Maxwell off,
and she's in a nice cushy prison now
with the pardon, you know, rather, proper agreement.
Excuse me.
Says Barack had already met Thiel in Davos,
of course,
years prior and took a meeting with him
after Epstein's suggestion, referring to him as f
f referring to it as a first date,
likely in relation to an investment in reportee
Homeland Security Limited, carbine with Thiel eventually investing
in the Israeli firm via his founders fund.
So you could you could argue they just
wanted to work together or maybe they had
blackmail on them like she Whitney was pointing
out they claimed they had on people in
Silicon Valley
and forced him into promoting their invasive Israeli
surveillance tech called Karabai nine one one. I
mean, that's just putting out an overlapping possibility.
Kinda hard to miss that possibility, though.
He told he he we totally need more
info, and this is, by the way, he
says, quote, Jeffrey Epstein. He told one scientist
that he was bankrolling efforts to identify a
mysterious particle that might trigger the feeling that
someone is watching you. How creepy is that?
Harrison Smith
from Infowars says Epstein's leaked emails to former
Israeli prime minister, Barack, reveal an Israeli centered
AI surveillance grid being built by Peter Thiel
and Palantir. Wow. Sounds like he's watching my
show. Well, what I said is, but Alex
says Palantir is just a small thing Democrats
hate because it's watching the government. In other
words, he's lying about every part of it.
But I'm sure you know this already.
Not that he has to, you know, I
mean, as as I understand it, apparently, they
talk about what they want. But what's interesting
is I don't know how many people recognize
what they're a part of. Like, Greg Reese
will tell you. Like, David Knight will tell
you. Like, TrueStream will tell you. Like, David
Burnley. It's pretty clear. The point
is that this is the reality of this
massive AI surveillance interconnected network, and I'm glad
he's pointing it out. Regardless of what platform
you're at, like, that is what I I
think that's the case. And and and the
idea that it's some small thing is silly.
The idea that it's Democrats hated is silly.
The idea that it's watching the government is
silly. All of which he pointed out, not,
Jones.
The reality is in your face as they
try to distract any which way possible.
Jones, anyway.
Last point,
the Israeli infiltration. Not like I need to
prove that. I think it's in your face
every which way if you just care to
look. But just to overlap some few more
points on the way out, Rachel says, at
this point, a reasonable person, which I agree
with, may reasonably conclude that there is a
deliberate attempt to undermine the British nation state
and that the British government is part of
it.
True Street Media says, same over here in
America. I think you know exactly what they're
both pointing to.
Scott Horton, here's an article exclusive.
Netanyahu
said this,
you can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel.
Funny how they keep redefining and narrowing that
definition. Eventually, it's gonna be, you can't be
MAGA unless you vote you know, if you
just you I don't know. Love Israel more
than any of you. Support Israel unless you
want America. Israel first over America. You know,
it's just it's just silly.
Every time time this has been going on,
it's been a little wait. Oh, those people
that call out Epstein are just the weaklings
in the group. They're not real MAGA. Well,
yeah. They're in fact, it seems like you
keep carving off the real people in your
movement,
creating this, like, sycophant,
team sport politics, Zionist
club that you pretend is the majority.
Clearly,
MAGA are the ones that are aware Israel's
a problem because they want America to be
great again. But Scott Horton says America first,
Israel instead.
Everyone sees it.
Now, talking about America first, let's not forget,
still to this day, by the way, unless
it changed in the last six hours, Israel
has been holding an American child from Florida
hostage
for six months. He's lost over 20 pounds.
He's got scabies, and god knows what else,
what's been done to him, what he's caught.
Not a single word from DeSantis or Trump.
How is that possible?
Well, just like when,
Joe Meaders, who was on the USS Liberty,
a veteran, was also arrested by Israel years
ago, nobody cared. No one said a word.
Or a US citizen can be shot. A
journalist can be killed. They don't care
as long as it's Israel.
An American
citizen is in an Israeli prison,
and you're not hearing a word about that.
But, of course, when a Israeli politician comes
to rape children and gets caught, they send
him back with his passport as fast as
possible. But we don't care about the American
in an Israeli prison. Right?
Look yourself in the mirrors, guys. You gotta
be honest about this.
Disclosed TV, this is from August 27.
New house launches invest or house launches investigation
into Wikipedia Foundation for advancing
antisemitic and anti Israel information in Wikipedia articles.
Interesting.
Well, jump back a couple of months. Here's
Alan Greenblatt advocating for the takeover of Wikipedia.
It's almost like The US Government said, gotcha.
We're on it. Jumped up and did that.
Just kinda hard to miss.
Here is a US here's an American military
well, he's in the army.
US army.
I'm deemed a threat to national security, he
says. You can watch it for yourself. US
sergeant says he is under investigation by the
US military, by the Trump administration for sharing
anti Israel social media posts. But America first,
guys,
clearly, you're not allowed to criticize a foreign
government, a military while you're in the US
military?
Welcome to the current reality.
Glenn Russell, glad he's finally starting to see
the reality that we were trying to get
him to see before this was all the
pure black pill, pro Trump discussion.
Alexandrovich's
attorney, that's the rapist
child molester that got sent back to Israel
with the US government allowed, and the two
Zionists within this government that'll well, two of
the many that were involved with this tried
to pretend like they weren't involved until they
got caught.
His attorney told him not to return for
trial.
He's just he just so happens to sit
on the Council of Homeland Security
because there's no incestuous overlap there. Right? So
this guy was appointed by Kristi Noem. A
month later, he's aiding an Israeli pervert.
Not just any Israeli, the head of Israeli
cyber defense. You think he might have something
to do with this AI invasive Israel run
platform?
No.
I doubt why the Israeli cyber defense outfit
would have anything to do with the cyber
platform. Right?
It's okay, though. He only rapes children. I'm
sure he won't manipulate anything for his own
benefit.
As the right headed libertarian says, it is
is it normal for Homeland Security to defend
foreign officials accused of sex crimes?
Not accused, guys. Caught.
Caught and charged with doing that in a
sting operation. So it wasn't a secret. It
wasn't a hypothetical. They knew what he asked
for. They caught him in real time. They
arrested him and charged him. And then the
US government let him go.
And then they tried to lie about it,
by the way. Both the US government, the
DHS, they all tried to lie about it
until the independent media kept it going.
How do you not see this for what
it is?
And then lastly, here's Kristi Noem herself. I
was pleased on August 28. I was pleased
to welcome
Israeli minister of foreign affairs, Gideon Saar, to
DHS headquarters today.
Wonder how many devices he planted. Kind of
joking. That's very very public in the past.
Stingray devices, Trump's last administration.
Many
CIA former will tell you.
What's his name? The one that speaks often
about it. I can't prove his name. He
tell he'll tell you that all the time.
They put devices. They leave things. They they'll
they'll harass you when you're in Israel. It's
not a secret. And this supposed to be
their allies, guys.
She meets him. We she says, we reaffirmed
our commitment to a strong partnership with Israel
on immigration,
border security, and combating antisemitism. Because those three
three things are right in the same conversation.
Right?
Immigration, border security, and stopping antisemitism. Well, you
know what? It is when you recognize what
it's all really about.
Well, weaponized immigration, the way that this border
conversation is used, censoring you based on antisemitism.
Yeah. They're all pretty much the same conversation,
so they kind of let the cat out
of the bag there, in my opinion.
But aren't they committing a genocide? Didn't they
just meet with these people thirty seconds ago?
It doesn't matter. That's a near daily event
where they're meeting, talking, chucking, touching base with
the Israeli government. You think I'm kidding?
It's all in your face. Now all of
this really matters to me more than anything
in this current conversation because of how
shockingly immersed Israel is with this government. And
as now they're rolling out an Israeli created
AI surveillance precrime platform,
I think it matters a little bit.
But if you're already watching this, I don't
need to convince you. You're damn you're well
aware of how bad this is.
This next step
is what I mean, I hate to even
frame it like this, guys. But my honest
opinion is always, this is the worrisome step
I've been waiting for. This is what we've
been worrying about what we've been telling you.
I mean, let's not see. We can look
at the steps that are keep the what
we've been saying has been step by step
happening,
sadly enough.
And now this net
the AI precrime
with with all of the other points we've
discussed that are already implemented, I feel like
this is a a step that will be
very difficult to take back.
Speak up.
And, you know, that's that's the positive note
to end on, guys. Do you why you
know why that's happening? Because you see them.
Because you see and are calling out what's
happening. I don't even mean everything we're talking
about. But you recognize that this is not
going in the direction of America first.
You know you see it. And that's not
and and that makes the power structure, whichever
one you're talking about, very uncomfortable.
That you're not just
swayed by screams of racism, that you're aware,
you're calling it out, you're standing your ground,
even against the team, hopefully, more and more.
And so this is a step to push
that back.
Right?
Well, now you are about to attack an
Israeli. Now you are about to attack that
synagogue. You're getting arrested. Red hat or not?
Don't forget. They already said you were all
racist for wearing that red hat back when
truck you know, all the overlaps before this.
Now it just shifted into the you know,
it's all about whoever, whenever, all the time.
I mean, the government will tell already tell
you that with the laws they have in
the books going back years that they want
you to be a felon, they could make
that happen. This is just one more step.
And,
again, the point overall is that this is
there because we are changing as a people,
as a society, as a country.
We are evolving.
We're growing.
You know? It's like we're in these old
parachute. We're we're we're just we are not
this does not work anymore, and we we
are ready for something new. And they are
desperate to shove you back into that same
old thing with a slightly different flare. Right?
It's just I think it's obvious that this
is an attempt to stop what people are
awakening to.
That's what I think anyway. And I think
that's a very positive thing. I mean, it's
it's hard to to feel that when it's
all so chaotic. But, again, as I've said
before, think about how much how much suppression
and censorship,
financial and otherwise,
every I mean, algorithmic control,
you know, the I mean, every single piece
of effort that they throw on top of
us from the the lawsuits. I mean, not
even just us. Anybody doing this for the
right reasons and calling out the right things
in my as as far as I see
it.
And nonetheless, despite all of that, we are
still breaking through
that they are still forced to acknowledge our
conversations, are still forced to engage with what
the because
you are dictating the conversation. How is that
not positive? Think about how powerful it is.
With all their tools, you're still breaking through.
Keep fighting.
I love you all.
As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
There's a sticker that says that you've questioned
everything in the last American Vagabond. I was
just curious what that was. Oh,
I couldn't podcast.
It's a podcast.
Podcast?
It's a good one.
Check it out. Yeah. I probably learn a
lot.