Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality
he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved, only unarmed. This is something
that I'm going to carry for the rest
of my life.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 08/24/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Have a
lot to talk about today. A lot of
the topics we told you we were gonna
get to, we pushed off mostly yesterday. We're
gonna follow-up on what's going on around Maxwell.
We're gonna discuss the updates on what's going
on around Israel, at least as much as
we can get to today,
but a lot more than that. I put
I I put together quite a bit today
that I think is really relevant. A lot
of it building off the show we did
yesterday and the few that we've done recently.
The really important one that kind of overlaps
the technocratic tiptoe,
the one yesterday around the the, Pronomos Capital
and the teal universe and the funding of
all these freedom city slash,
technocratic hellscapes,
The idea of the smart city, freedom city
overlap, the funding around Prospera and how it
all ties together, like, on the record ties
together. It's it's quite obvious
that I wanna build on that today and
show a couple more points that I think
are very relevant. But like I said, there's
quite a bit to talk about today at
any given day as you well know. There
always is. And on that note yesterday, or
I I aired it today
oh, actually, technically, it was the twenty second,
but I aired it today at interview with
Charlie Robinson
on that very point. You know, what the
hell is happening? We've been calling it because
it's just it's we we kinda touch base
once a month and discuss how just the
crazy twenty four hour news cycle and how
much can change in one month period of
time and just get caught up. I always
evaluate his opinions.
My point being is there's always
a lot to cover. But today,
I we're gonna try to get to quite
a bit, and I think in a not
you know, some a lot of times we'll
do deep dives on certain topics, but a
lot that we're gonna talk about today is,
you know, multifaceted. You'll see what I mean
as we go through it. Starting with some
important points, I think, just to kinda set
the table. We're gonna get early into the
part about martial law, the discussion around what's
happening, and and overlap that with what we
talked about yesterday and then the points that
are new today
and the alarming reality. The overlap of the
Posse Comitatus Act and the conversations around not
only giving them, you know, lethal arms to
enforce the law, both of which I mean,
all the different parts of which every which
way this is going. Let's put it that
way.
The only thing that this
legally speaking, they think gives them a pass
on this is that it declared an emergency,
which then argues that it's within the constitution
because congress didn't allow this. And unless it's
in if the constitution allows it or congress
authorizes it, what they're doing is illegal.
And so it's pretty obvious that they're and
this is the point of emergency government governance,
whether it's Obama or Biden or Trump. It's
the idea of just declaring emergencies or every
single governor of the country, it seems, and
then doing whatever they want as if that's
somehow in line with the constitution. We're gonna
make some important points on this today to
understand
that this has been an ongoing point.
I framed it an interesting way in the
title today, not necessarily even a joke, you
understand, because
look. It's considered a conspiracy theory. The idea
that Obama had plans to roll out martial
law, FEMA camps, and all the conversation.
I'm I don't I I'm not I don't
know. I'm not even gonna say I don't
think so. I know that was not a
false story. Now whether or not
all parts of it were true or whether
or not it, you know, changed because of
people's awareness of it, which I think is
always something to consider, not assume, but consider,
the point is that there were elements of
that reality that absolutely
were real. And if you look at it,
which we will briefly today, you'll find shocking
overlaps to what's currently happening today. And so
I think it's really interesting both to show
you the continuity of left and right and
no just the government, but also to hopefully
reach
people who don't want to see that it
really is the same idea. Or rather as
I point out, I was talking to someone
today, if if Biden was doing what you're
pointing to,
that that wouldn't be okay. Whether it was
Maxwell, like, if Biden was making a deal
with Maxwell
in any context, you damn well know what
the conservatives now cheering it on or gaslighting
it would say. Now that's not to make
porn about whether right or wrong is about
hypocrisy and trying to reach those people to
show them that this is the same agenda
that they were fighting before.
We're gonna talk about the overlap in this
within the current reality of DC and the
other state states that are that it's rolling
out to. We're gonna talk about the plan
that was kind of laid out in regard
to the all encompassing federal control over this,
not just involving the guard, but, I guess,
the IRS,
all sorts of different parts of this that
are happening in these play at least in
The States in which this is starting to
happen.
At least that's the way it's being framed,
and I'll show you what I mean directly
from the people in charge.
We're gonna go over the Abrego Garcia updates
that I wanted you to see, and within
that talk about immigration and all the different
horrifying realities. And let's not forget, as I
made very clear yesterday,
and it's not a secret. It's listed in
certain points of, you know, talking points in
different interviews, but it's not really made public
to for most people, I would argue, that
this is the immigration agenda. What they're doing
in Washington DC is if not half, almost
entirely,
like, depends on who you listen to. And
I think the metrics show you a large
portion of people they're going after about immigration.
It has nothing to do with the reality
of DC crime on the regular. Just going
after people who are you know, have visas
or green cars, but had a traffic stop
three years ago. That's not what people are
pretending is happening. But my point is that
this is the same agenda, so it should
make you wonder whether either of those narratives
are actually what this is. And I I
think it's obvious that's not what's happening. We're
gonna go over how Garcia
his his story really does make a important
point about what's been going on, the the
the rampant lawlessness of the government in in
round this whole story and the vindictive nature
of what they're now doing.
And, again, some really horrifying stories about US
veterans being beat up by ICE or being
arrested or, you know, just on and on
and on. Everything the people supporting this pretend
is not happening or it's all somehow a
democrat ruse. The truth is it's very clear.
Trump supporters, veterans, people with US citizenship, green
cards, visas, or seeking citizenship the right way
are all being treated as criminals should they
be in the wrong place at the wrong
time and usually with the wrong skin color.
It's not I don't think it's even about
race at the end of the day, but
that is a driving force in this. And
if you're ignoring that, then you're lying to
yourself.
We're also gonna talk about, like I said
yesterday, the or the show from yesterday, the
the, Pernomos Capital
and the kind of overarching point around all
of that, which is the the
largely the Washington DC extension,
Freedom City Technocracy, but I wanna update some
points around that that you probably you might
have seen. There's a conversation going around,
in in some I think Glenn Beck did
an interview with somebody, I'll I'll shout this
out in a minute, in regard to the
55
UN agenda. Now, really, this is I I
we haven't pointed this document, but this is
just a new version of the same things
that have been rolling out for a long
time. But it is important, and I want
you to see this. And understand that this
is, you know, as it basically, ultimately is,
I think it's, what, 50 governments in the
world within, I think it's five years, that's
the 55, to implement just all digital infrastructure
or in in regard to the the techno
the technocratic
digital ID, digital money, the whole thing.
And that's
clearly supported by the UN,
also clearly supported by the World Economic Forum,
who's now run by Larry Fink, who is
inside the inner circle of Donald Trump's administration.
But that's no big deal, though. We're still
to ignore all of that or the fact
that BlackRock is funding Twitter. But, oh my
God, we find out BlackRock's involved with Cracker
Barrel? Whoo, that's a big story. But let's
ignore
all the BlackRock connections to Rumble or to,
you know, the things that we don't You
get the point. We're gonna go over that.
And, of course, in case you're new to
the show, the point is not one or
the other. It's all of it should matter.
If black rock's a problem, black rock's a
problem
on either side. And it's really important to
see how this all connects, overlapping that with
Bill Gates as well, who also is very
close to the Trump administration these days and
showing you what they're now doing. It's all
part of the same agenda, and it's really
shocking how
some
I guess I mean, there are people that
are ignoring it, but some who just seem
to not
incapable of seeing it. And the different points
in this administration of checking the boxes of
the fifteen and five, which is where it's
going. And, of course, we're gonna talk about
Epstein, Maxwell, the updates there, and talk about
Israel and the ongoing
starvation, famine,
and genocide.
If you haven't seen it by now, and
this is not new if you watch this
show, seeing as how the IPC had already
put out many very clear statements about famine,
but they have officially confirmed
at a large scale that this is the
class five famine,
not a fringe couple of people, not some
kids with deficiencies. No. No. No. The legitimate
fee people starving, dying in the streets. We
already knew this, though, but it's important to
see that it is being engaged with even
by the corporate media as well as the
genocide point. Now look. We don't need to
con we don't need to prove. There's it
doesn't matter what's coming out this week, last
week, or four months from,
we're ready to say that, four months ago.
A month into this, if you were honest
with yourself, you knew this was genocide.
Just like everybody is now very clearly proving,
and the data goes back well before October
7. The point is that even more has
come out, and we'll show you very clearly
that these things are the reality. But again,
my point is, if you're on this show,
you probably already know that. But it's important
to keep up on what is going on
and to what your government's involved in, which
is exactly what we're talking about. Whether Trump
or Biden or anybody else, they are lockstep
with this genocide.
And again, if you understand everything else, you'll
see how it's that ties right back into
the larger agenda that we're seeing. Some of
it's about Israel's
Zionist sociopathic
psychopathic
genocide agenda,
greater Israel genocide, but it's also about the
other parts as well. And so it all
interconnects. So that's why the show is from
before that I reference, which I'll include today,
you should watch.
Let's start today with a couple of quick
points that I do want you to see
that I think are interesting. Just to kind
of, again, some set set the table.
Right now, there's a lot going on. Right?
Epstein story, Maxwell, the extension of it. And
despite how clearly they want to pretend it's
not there, it is getting worse. And I
think this is what's it's most evident in
conservative circles.
It's it's really conflicting for people in this
field right now.
And my point in showing you these first
few points is that they're it's just a
lot about trying to get you to look
in other directions, and I wanna make a
clear connection to this. This is just one
of, like, probably 50 I could have shown
you today. But this is random account, hadn't
seen before, but has
358,000
followers.
This post
has 3,900,000
views. It was about two point something like
a day and a half ago. So this
is only getting more and more and more
reach. You know? You'd be most people on
this platform would be ecstatic to get a
100,000 views. He's gotten 2,000,000 more since the
last time I looked at this. Now the
point is, this is a false story, and
it's really easy to prove.
Doge confirms
USAID gave Chelsea Clinton a grant of $82,000,000
through the Clinton Global Initiative, 3,000,000 of which
was spent on her wedding and another 11,000,000
was in a mansion.
Now is in any way am I suggesting
that the Clinton family are not criminal? No.
They're very much criminals. The Clinton Global Initiative,
massive part of it. Chelsea, a huge part
of the abuse of that system.
My point is that this is a story
being put out there.
And what we keep seeing in the, like,
the people's voice kind of garbage platforms that
will take a real thing, like the Clintons
are criminals, and that all of them are,
you know, pay to play and and, you
know, manip political manipulations
that we all seem to generally know and
then make a fake story on top of
that. So when you come in and go,
but that's not actually accurate. You you support
the Clintons?
No. I didn't say that. But this is
they are hurting the reality of the they're
they're
counter to the truth.
Very important to understand. Now this is here's
just Grock, by the way. No. There's no
evidence, but not like it matters in regard.
You should look it up for yourself. Confirm
it for yourself. You'll find that this is
not actually accurate. But I think it's important
to see that it gets so much reach
and continues to get more reach. And it's
stories like this that simply make people look
anywhere else.
And isn't it interesting that the image also
is weirdly Epstein and Bondi?
Why?
I mean, it's almost like you're sup it's
like, you know, Epstein or this story instead,
kinda like shuffling people into this. I just
think it's everywhere you look right now. And
you guys know this. I don't need to
inform the audience about this. It's really apparent
right now. But this is what I thought
was even more interesting.
This self professed, self claimed,
proclaimed, massage agent, Gad Sad, or however you
say his name. How is this possible? He
says, pointing to a very easily proven fake
story, which I'm willing to bet he probably
knows. But you see, this is what their
job is. And here here are the actual,
no. USAID did not do that again. Look
it up for yourself. Don't trust Crock.
But it's very interesting to see. Now why
wouldn't a Mossad agent want you to look
in other are we supposed to believe that
they're working with the Clintons? Well, they probably
are in many ways, but it's about look
over there. Don't look at the moment that
we're currently conducting our agendas. That's my personal
opinion, but I think it's very obvious. I'm
just showing you this one example.
Take it in your mind and look on
Twitter, look on Gab, look anywhere else. You'll
find this stuff all over the place,
which is free speech. They're allowed to do
whatever they want in regard to speech and
posting, but acknowledge how wild it is and
how how much engagement it gets with people
that wanna talk about the truth, you know,
proclaim they do. Slow news day,
Steve highlights Nick Sorey cheering on what in
other in other context, he would call socialism
if it was Biden doing it, and that's
Trump
basically strong strong arming a stake, 10% stake
in intel.
Steve says, so if if I have this
right, in the last month, Trump has given
Palantir the green light for a centralized database
on every US citizen, federalized the police force
and plans to expand through every major city,
nationalized a key segment of industry. Are we
winning yet? Team freedom? It's just it's I
don't even need to explain. It's embarrassing that
people are pretending like this is in any
way what we voted for. He got a
mandate. And people just like this, their job
is to cheerlead. That's what it is.
But, again,
if Obama did that, what do you think
they would say?
That's hypocrisy.
Also, you know, this is the point about
the Cracker Barrel thing. DC Draynor goes, let
it forever be known. Cracker Barrel and
the other CEOs have destroyed their careers. Yeah.
I don't disagree in regard to, like, the
Gillette thing. Charlie and I talked about this,
in the last show, in the show I
played today. My point though is with all
that's going on, you'll find a very weird
amount of time focused on things like this.
All of them making, like, 17 tweet threads
about how Cracker Barrel and the woke agenda.
Yeah. I get it. It's ridiculous, but it's
a very small story in the real picture,
especially when you understand that it's not even
really about the woke ideas. It's about control.
But I think it's obvious that this is
about looking somewhere else. And I said both
sides of the false binary are all out
there dutifully supporting the current thing.
How very woke of them all. All of
them, left and right. Then we're gonna come
back to a point, I think, also of
DC pointing about a BlackRock connection to these,
and we'll make that when we get there.
Of course, the one time they wanna care,
at least in the context of today, of
where BlackRock is invested, but they'll blind themselves
to every other example of it when it
comes to their team.
Now we also see this kind of stuff.
And I like, I about this is a
bolt, for the podcast, Bolton,
the raid of his house and and the
alleged the claim
from some unnamed,
you know, Jones' secret DOJ sources that all
tell him there's gonna be a massive run.
All these grand juries and all these investigations.
Here comes the q anon claims in in
in earnest. Didn't say that, but that's exactly
what this represents. Grand juries and march for
my military tribunals and okay. I'm not suggesting
that there's not going to I don't know.
It wouldn't surprise me with how desperate they
seem that they would start throwing people onto
the bus to stop where we're all looking.
Bolton seems like a possible example. Like, that
would actually make sense to me because he's
a very hated person, but he also kinda
knows where the bodies are buried. Right? So
you wonder if that will my point is,
this is Jones saying, the FBI raid on
Bolton is part of a much larger DOJ
strike force operation to target the deep state.
Right? Of course, because the deep state's only
part it's only one half of the paradigm
because it makes sense that an entire structure
trying to overtake our government would only focus
on part of it. Right? Does that make
sense?
So stupid to pretend like this is not
an obvious, you know, the deep state being
used by these people as some kind of
generalized term to just point at Democrats. It's
just lazy. But overall, I said, who's got
the odds on whether this is yet another
hype, false story in a long line of
hype, false stories that leads nowhere but to
the sale of penis pills on Infowars?
As well as we all should, I certainly
hope these criminals are arrested, but history suggests
that we're being played.
So we'll wait and see.
But how long do we wait until we
start to recognize if it comes to pass
that nothing ends up happening, that this was
a bunch of hype? Does that mean he
lied about it? Maybe. Does that mean his
sources who maybe actually exist are giving him
BS? That's also something that's worth considering. This
is a clip that I'll play a part
of that I think is worth remembering. This
goes back a long way.
Well, one of the four
principal functions of the CIA is to gather
intelligence and
and ideally forward it to the
the president, the users of information, the policy
makers as they say. There are other functions,
however, some of them more legitimate than others.
One is to run secret wars,
the covert action that's written and talked about
so much, like what's happening in Nicaragua today
from Honduras.
Another thing is to
disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds,
and this is a major function of the
CIA.
And,
unfortunately, of course, it overlaps
into the gathering of information.
You you have contact with a journalist.
You will give him true stories. You'll get
information from him. You'll also give him false
stories. Did you buy his confidence with true
stories? You buy his confidence and set him
up. We've seen this happen in, recently with
Jack Anderson, for example, who who has his
intelligence sources, and he has also admitted that
he's been set up by him. You know,
every fits.
You get the point. It goes on a
little bit longer. The point is simply he
goes every fifth story was, you know, they
still give you they gave you true stories,
and every fifth one was false. You know,
the that's what the truth and true stories
were all to get gain your trust so
that one that really mattered was misled.
My point is that we have to consider
that today. Right? And that the idea I'll
come back to this really quickly. I just
saw that while I was waiting. The idea
that this is just more of that I
mean, look. The history is clear. You could
look up whether this platform, which is just
this game that he was right game is
so lazy because of how often they're wrong.
Doesn't mean they're not occasionally right about things
that everyone also saw too or just other
times that they had some insight that we
didn't see. But it's just not accurate. And
I cover this pretty for a long time
now. And not just in general, I mean.
But the next point is the same thing.
He's doing he has the same post that
says, huge DOJ actions are coming. And then
the next day, he posts this
blank piece of paper. Boom.
That's what it says. I don't even who
knows? Maybe we're missing some QAnon secret code
that we don't recognize. But it says, is
that the new Epstein list that Trump released?
Good point.
But the point overall is that, you know,
if we see more coming, I think we
should all
hope to see people who are criminals get
arrested.
But do you really think that's happening? Do
you think with the dealing with Maxwell, all
the different things that have been pulled, the
claims? Like, according to Jones, the Venice the
war in Ukraine ended a long time ago.
According to him, Netanyahu and Trump broke a
long time ago. According to him, we should
invade Venezuela. Like, these are silly things to
understand based on the previous statements of before.
Now quickly before we go forward,
every single time, I I just happen to
see it live. We put this out, and
here here's what you get. This sounds
like a wild conspiracy
theory. I saw this guy break her down,
except that guy doesn't do that. This guy
is a fake bot
adviser,
financial adviser on Twitter. This is CHEQ, guys.
This is what they allow on this platform,
which I always block because they are just
then they just pop right back up, and
they block me as you can tell because
they that's about downgrading your reach on these
platforms.
There it is every single day.
Anyway, continuing.
Now continuing and just opening kind of, you
know, laying standing the table points, I think
it's important to see that left or right,
guys, whatever it is, whether media, mainstream alternative
media, or just
in congress, in the executive branch, these people
are all doing the same thing all the
time. And that's that's one of the reasons
why I wanted to frame it as sort
of Trump's rolling out Obama's plan is to
make put it in your mind that this
is the same thing. But here is, Brianna
Joy Gray saying I just wanna say Grey
Joy from from, from,
Game of Thrones. But knowingly lying to manufacture
consent for Biden's genocide and telling the truth
only when out of power,
which seems to happen often these days, is
morally worse than being a true believer. I
completely agree with that. Not only does it
show at least if you kept lying, you
at least have consistency. At least you have
some kind of determination. Right? It shows you're
just a wishy washy manipulator, that you're gonna
be lying for them while you're there and
then come out and be like, I I
was wrong and I knew it, and I
wanna tell you now. You're weak. Not only
are you dishonest, not only are you a
genocide supporter, you're also too weak to carry
that to continue and back up what you
did. You know what I mean? At the
end of the day, I'm glad they're pointing
it out. And, look, it maybe it is
just that they had a moral breakdown and
then finally realized they were wrong. I hope
that as much as I think Matt Miller
is a disgusting person.
The point is that he came out and
admitted this now in multiple interviews. Former US
state department, spokesman Matt Miller. Netanyahu
told us he intends to continue the war
for decades and was imposing conditions when we
sought a deal. The Israeli government has been
obstructing a ceasefire and now setting new demands.
It's insane that he can say that publicly
and doesn't even doesn't even
influence
remotely
the current situation.
All the same platforms lie in the the
US government lying about the fact that this
Hamas's fault. It's all up to Hamas.
How many more thing I mean, that's the
thing.
The first
month of this had enough information to prove
to you that we already knew what was
going on, and yet we're still years beyond
a year beyond, and we are still lying
to ourselves. Or rather, we're all seeing it,
and the government doesn't care that we see
it. And here's an actual clip. You can
listen to it for yourself. It's Matt Miller
speaking, and it just says there was an
Israeli pattern we saw for months. Every time
we almost reach a deal, Israel looked for
ways to add new conditions. Yeah. You heard
that if you watch this show or anybody
honest about it. Now we're not gonna go
into Israel first, but I wanted to set
the table for this is what Trump's administration
is doing right now too. The same thing
with a little bit different slant. You know?
Usually, what Trump is doing about and we
I I did put off some stuff at
the end too about, like, the potential Russia
Ukraine conversation. You might find out if you
look that Lavrov is now saying that The
United States is responsible for trying to blow
up this deal. You know, that may seem
confusing if you wanna listen to Trump pretending
he's trying to make a be be a
peacemaker. He's not.
Or at the end of the day, at
least he maybe he does and his real
controllers don't want him to. But if you
look at the pattern and look at the
left or the right, the government itself, none
of them want this to stop. And if
they did, they'd stop it right away. So
what this seems to me is the continuation
of him looking like he's like the outside
party, like I'm just helping out, even though
he's a central player. The Pentagon also spoke
up and said that they aren't allowed to
bomb in Russia. It's like, let's acknowledge this
is a US proxy war like it always
has been and Israel as well because they've
been arming the Azov movement for decades.
The point though, it's the same damn thing.
They'll
gaslight you all day long and then try
to gain your favor when they're the supposedly
the rebel party. Now they're the ones rebel
fighting the big power. They're all the same
thing, and it's just disgusting. We can't acknowledge
that. Now last point back to the Intel
thing.
Howard Lutnick says, big news. United States Of
America now owns 10% of Intel, one of
the great American technologies. Now quickly,
interestingly enough, Intel said in a statement that
the government's planned stake in the company would
be passive,
which I highly doubt that Trump is even
gonna care even if that's written in stone.
And it says with no board seats or
special government governance rights. The government agreed to
a vote to to simply vote in line
with the Intel board and shareholders, except in
limited circumstances. That's my point. You give them
that loophole, they're gonna do whatever they want.
But the point is that you're basically feigning
to just do whatever Intel wants.
That I mean, guys, you're just watching this
fascistic overlap, and it's not about left versus
right. It's not socialism versus the it is
the government, and it's a willingness
to take whatever power it can wherever it
can while screaming freedom. It's as far back
as you wanna look. And it's just interesting
to me. And the point is not just
about that, but what he what Massey points
out, which I agree. Our government should not
have ownership in private companies. Yeah. That's something
Republicans used to all like, everybody who cared
about the constitutional reality, all agreed with. Right?
Or or the idea of just the problem
of what that presents or creates, like fascism,
for example. When corporate entities and government sort
of blend together, that's the World Economic Forum.
That's where we're going. There are so many
specific problems with with an arrangement like this,
he says. But, fundamentally,
this is not who we are as a
country.
James says at some point, it becomes necessary
when other every other government is going to
do it. There's the old tired argument today.
Well, they did it first, so you're a
child, and you're just as bad. Okay.
Massey says beating communism by employing communism sounds
like a great plan.
See? This is why they hate him because
they make he makes them look like what
they really are. And I'm not even saying
I you could
I will always question everybody.
But he has very clearly been consistent for
quite a while, which is why I point
to him. And the reality is you're supporting
communism, and you pretend like you're fighting it.
It's just it's sad, but I think a
lot of conservatives are starting to find out.
And it's not just like supporting communism. Right?
It's about the idea of
using whatever they currently can to drive in
a point of control. But communism or fascism
or Zionism, these are all elements of what
we're seeing today. Now I wrote this out
just to remind myself.
Right? Remember all the times we told you
about how the government was shifting
toward you? I mean, it goes, like, a
long way. War the war on terror turned
out, it pretty much got aimed at you.
But we saw the same thing in in
the evolution of, like, the technocrat the technocratic
growth in this country. Whitney and I talked
about this
many times over the years. You know? Or
even during COVID nineteen, she coined the phrase
that your body is the new battlefield. They
have turned in toward you, if not always
have been. So keeping this in mind
keeping this in mind to in this next
segment we're gonna talk about,
it's important to think about that that very
point that, you know, that you are the
focal point. Right? That you are the worry.
Your government is more concerned about what you're
doing than anything else we're talking about because
they recognize that we're starting to see that
they not
they are not what they claim to be.
And whether that means they're not constitutionally
in line or they're being ruled by somebody
else, people in this country are rapidly starting
to recognize this and call it out. So
with that in mind,
let's talk about the martial law overlap and
how things are being aimed at you. This
is the last show we did on this.
Martial law rolls out around The United States,
Maxwell transcript ploy, which by the way, again,
I don't see many people talking about this.
See, these are things that I rarely tweet
because I talk about on the show. But
I'm willing to bet you if somebody just
goes out and puts this out there, it's
suddenly this
why are we missing three hours of content
in the in the supposed audio?
No one wants to talk about that. Thought
tell me what why were we you know,
we got nine hours of conversation, and we're
told that this is supposed to be about
transparency. We cut out parts about
three hours?
You do you tell me if I'm wrong.
I added it all up myself from the
transcripts they put out from the DOJ page,
and it's, like, six and some change.
Not nine.
Of course, we can all trust the transcripts,
or we can look at the ones next
order edited so it wouldn't show certain parts
because it's all about transparency.
But
martial law.
Now going on this point where we are
today and kind of the you know, we
watch that show if you want the up
to now, but I'm sure pretty much everybody's
aware of what's happening. It's pretty public. But
Trump now expands cities targeted for possible military
deployment to Baltimore in a spat with governor.
I thought it was a good place to
start on this point because it shows you
before you even get to Garcia, just the
the childish vindictive
nature. Is it because Baltimore's ridden ridden with
crime? Well, it's got plenty got plenty of
crime like a lot of states do. A
lot of cities do, but it's not it's
definitely not the the the top of the
list.
Just like Washington DC doesn't even make the
top 30.
We showed you the the Newsweek breakdown yesterday
of the top 30, and they they not
even close. The point is that this is
an argument he has with this guy and
then suddenly starts suggesting, well, that city's next,
just like he keeps doing anywhere. Oh, yeah.
You don't like what I'm saying? We have
to look into your school and change some
funding. It's like, that has nothing to do
with anything other than your vindictive nature because
they don't they're not blindly supporting you. Now
in another show, I may get into it,
but there's apparently a report about Trump's blacklist,
which doesn't surprise anybody if you're paying attention.
That the idea is that they have a
whole list of companies and whether or not
they simply pander to whatever Trump wants, and
if they do, they get more.
Simple. Now I wouldn't be surprised if that's
what every president's ever done, but it's very,
very clear in this administration.
So this says, last week, Trump was said
he was considering Chicago and New York for
troop deployments similar to what he has unleashed
on the nation's capital, where thousands of national
guard and federal law enforcement officers are patrolling
the streets.
Trump made the threat to Baltimore in a
spat with governor Wes Moore, a Democrat who
has criticized Trump's unprecedented flex of federal power
aimed at combating crime and homelessness in Washington.
Moore last week invited Trump to visit his
state to discuss public safety and walk the
streets. In a true social post, Trump said
Moore asked in a rather nasty and provocative
tone,
how dare he?
Like like, you've never done exactly that all
the time. And it says, and then raised
the specter of repeating a national guard deployment
he made in Los Angeles over the objections
of California Democratic governor Gavin Newsom. Wes Moore's
record on crime is a very bad one.
Unless he fudges his figures on crime like
many other blue states are doing, I have
still yet to see anybody prove that claim.
You know, I put I'd say every time.
It I mean,
if you wanna find something that how do
I say it? It won't be hard to
sell me on that. Something that I would
easily be like, yes. That's probably the case.
Left or right, if you ask me, do
you think the government's fudging? Yes. Probably. Before
you even finish the sentence. But whether or
not it's proven, obviously should matter. But yet
Matt Miller or Steven Miller and the rest
of them are just kinda floating these claims
because they're all just making the numbers up.
Well, then prove that. Prove to me that
you can show give me a statistic that
shows at least give me some contrast. All
we did was wave around some graphs on
paper in front of people, and then even
those were pulled out and shown to be
inaccurate. But the point is,
it wouldn't surprise me if they're lying. But
the same point is, how do we not
know that the the Republicans are lying just
the same way on their side? As we
come out with the numbers of who what
they claim they're stopping. We've arrested this many
and has taken all these guns. Okay. How
do we know that for sure?
I'm not saying I it certainly could be
the case. It wouldn't even surprise me if
it was real. But the idea that we're
just taking at face value what they say
when they've been caught lying about every single
thing they've done this entire time, whether it's
immigration, whether it's ICE, whether it's court rulings,
If you're honest with yourself, you see this
too. They've been lying, like, egregiously more than
usual, at least being caught for it, I
would say.
Trump
Trump wrote as he cited a pejorative nickname
he frequently uses for the California governor because
that's typically what they do. Just this very
petty and childish way about them where they
use fake names to downgrade people. It's about,
you know, dehumanization at the end of the
day. But if Wes Moore needs help like
Gavin Newsom did in LA, I will send
in the troops.
Right. Because that's the response, military deployment to
sweep up some crime or at least pretend
to stop some crime, ultimately roll out the
military enforcement, and then,
I guess, justify its continued deployment, which is
where we're going,
which is being done in near in nearby
DC and quickly clean up crime.
The idea that you can argue that somehow,
you know, by deploying the military is somehow
cleaning up crime, no. Pretty sure people are
just avoiding the military.
Right? I mean, it's yes. You're you're arresting
people, but in what world do you think
that this is just vanishing?
You know what I mean? Like, so you
got a guy who was stealing something. Does
that mean the crime of the it's just
it's it's it ultimately
comes down to the point is they're gonna
either rationalize continuing the military deployment because of
that very reason or rationalize some kind of
enforcement arm, which is the quick response team
they're already talking about.
Because if they just remove, then it'll go
back to the way it was, which is
the point that anybody made who was honest
about this.
That's the whole rationale you understand. They're gonna
justify
the never ending police enforcement, rather military enforcement
in this context. Now that doesn't mean you're
gonna just see them deploy the way they
are now forever,
but this is the normalization
of this step. And if Obama had done
this, I don't even just you know exactly
what they would say, exactly what they've always
said, martial law.
I think Chicago will be our next, Trump
told reporters.
And then we'll help with New York, clearly,
because everyone thinks they're helping. And you realize
despite the narratives, there's, in my opinion, looking
at in a broad way, from left platforms,
right platforms, videos you find online, it seems
to me that it's pretty split down the
middle. You've got people and largely the insiders,
the congressmen,
the billionaire. Like, the people in those areas
that are inside the inner circle and the
1% are the ones going, oh my god.
It's so great. Trump's changing everything. It's so
safe out here. And then people you talk
to are pretty much like, this is crazy.
It's unconstitutional. Republicans, Democrats alike. Now that's not
all. There's obviously different parts of it, but
that seems to be the majority of what
I see. Tell me what you're looking
at. Now this is ABC News from yesterday
oh, two days ago. National Guard in DC
to carry m 17 pistols, which is what
we told you in the last show.
Con, con conduct law enforcement duties,
task force says. Well, we've talked about this.
Right?
Enforcement of the law
is where it becomes a violation of the
Posse Comitatus Act.
National Guard troops deployed on the streets of
DC will now carry weapons for personal protection
and are allowed to carry out law enforcement
duties. Okay. So what's the rationale here?
Wait. Didn't they just tell us they cleaned
up the crime?
Right. So you did it. So now now
you're increasing
the the the the, you know, more presence,
more weapons? Is it almost as if there's
more crime all of a sudden? Like, I
don't understand how you can do this, claim
the crime is gone, and then
deploy more troops.
Rationalize
more enforcement, more weapons. I mean, it doesn't
make any sense unless you realize it wasn't
really about the crime, which is where I
think everyone's starting to get to. My point
is that you're rolling this out, carrying weapons
on the idea that you need more defense
when, again, your crime is gone. But on
top of that,
isn't there already a police force? And then
there's also less crime like you just told
us? So why would you need these people
with weapons? I mean, you guys, it's not
that hard to recognize why this is at
the very least, it's not for the reason
they're claiming.
That's self evident.
You know why I think it is, but
please just recognize the inconsistency,
the lazy way they put these things together.
The decision is an escalation in Donald Trump's
use of military troops to address what he
insists is out of control crime in the
nation's capital. Right? Again, my point is this
is after they tell you they've so he
goes to press conference and he says the
we removed all the crime. We arrest all
these people. The streets are safer than they've
ever been. They've said that many times over
the last couple of days. You've seen it.
Nick Sorter sharing pictures of empty streets going,
oh my god. He did it. It's so
safe.
But now it's out of control. We need
more forces. I mean, it's that's the time
frame here.
That's pretty weird, isn't it? I mean, really
obvious.
Trump has mobilized nearly 2,300
national guard troops from DC
and six states with Republican governors, which is
the point.
Crossing state lines is, again, I've gone over
all of this. And the only reason they
claim this is somehow not a crime is
because, well, we declared an emergency.
That seems to work for the most part
because our congress is completely
compromised. And I don't even mean this. We
all just mean that that is that is
the case too. But, I mean, that they
just are unwilling to push back. The whole
way the check and balance is supposed to
work is that congress, when your executive branch
in particular,
does something illegal, unconstitutional,
is that they go, well, you know, you
can't do that. And if you persist, then
we'll impeach you.
They don't do that anymore in any context.
And if they even begin and it becomes
some kind of a it's a Democrat attack
or a Republican attack on the on the
team fighting for freedom. And it just and
it just oscillates back and forth. I mean,
it is very clear. We talk about this
on fine points all the time.
Now I you know, the argument is to
get people involved is is what, Bruce would
say, and I agree with that. But I
just worry that we're at a point where
that's been so captured that these people, you
know, that they don't care what we have
to say. I'm not saying don't get involved.
I'm just saying we have to think about
plenty of other ways to draw awareness to
what this is because this is happening.
And they are violating in every which way,
declaring emergencies that never go away. Congress is
completely a part of it regardless of the
screaming.
Now I that's a that's a bad position
to be in.
But the troops were unarmed until now, which
by the way is not even true, to
be honest. We've seen plenty of examples of
both the marines and the national guard with
weapons in plenty of photographs in LA and
here, but, you know, it doesn't matter because
it's about setting the narrative. The task force
also noted in a statement late Friday that
guards guard troops can carry out law enforcement
duties
because,
here's the point, they're operating under title 32
status,
a law that exempts troops from restrictions under
the 1878
Pussy Comitatus Act because they are still technically
under the state governor's command.
So, basically, he's having governors deploy troops
as if they're under the governor's command, but
then the executive branch is dictating what they
do. And they're trying to pretend that's somehow
allowed. That means it's not the violation.
It is a loophole that was set up
for this very purpose that Trump already said
in his last administration. I'll come to it
next. Legal experts have long warned about how
presidents might use title 32 as a kind
of legal loophole to posse comitatus.
Wait. And I'll I'll go over that the
law and what that means in a second,
which is supposed to prevent the president from
using the military as a domestic police force,
which is literally what we're watching.
Under title 32, a president pays for a
guard mission while keeping troops under control of
the governors.
In this case, Trump asked red state governors
to send their troops to DC.
While those governors technically retain control, which they
clearly do not, their missions are being decided
by the White House. So that's a oxymoron
as far as I'm concerned. They they technically
are in control, but they literally have no
the White House is dictating. Or do we
believe the governor can step over and circumvent
Trump's orders right now? No. So they're not
in control.
In a visit to the guard personnel on
on Thursday,
president Trump suggested the military personnel would be
playing a larger role in law enforcement. So
what that shows me, on Thursday, and it
is Sunday today, well before they were telling
you they already planned to do this.
Okay? So now think about the timing.
At that point, they had already been enforcing.
They had already been telling you that crime
was going away. We already did our job.
Thursday, he was already telling them, we're going
to get you're gonna be enforcing the law.
Okay?
Now it's Sunday,
and their claim it's even more and so
do you see my point? They planned to
make more enforcement. They planned to violate this
act. They planned to give them weapons at
a time when they were telling you it
was safer than ever.
I don't think this is hard to see.
In his visit to the guard troops on
Thursday, Trump suggested the troops could stay for
six months or longer. Yeah. We're gonna be
out of there so quick. It's gonna happen
so fast. How many times did he tell
you that? Six months is not fast. On
top of that, it's not gonna be six
months. Mark my words. It's gonna be longer.
Quote, you do the job on safety, and
I'll get this place fixed up physically. And
we're going to be so proud at the
end of six months. Well, let's wait and
see then. Let's wait and see what it
looks like in six months. And, of course,
if it doesn't look good, and it's only
gotten worse, it's gonna be all because the
Democrats. Just watch. Even though it's half half
true. It's all of them. But what's lazy
about this is you already can predict this.
We're not psychic. It's just the way it
always goes. It's really not even about the
this at the end of the day, in
my opinion. It's gonna be about control enforcement.
And then you're gonna have protesting because what
they're doing is unconstitutional,
illegal in a vast sense, and then those
people will be end up being framed for
why everything didn't work. And around and around
we go, and the government gets what it
wants. But let's say at the end of
the year, he says, this place will be
maxed out
in terms of beauty.
You'll have all new surfaces, all new medians.
Everything's going to look beautiful, weird. It's almost
like they're building a new city. It's almost
like this is the beginning of a new
freedom city or a smart city or a
fifty minute city or a Prosper or whatever
they're you know, or how about none of
that stuff? How about just the idea that
you're literally building back better?
But it's Trump though, so it's okay because
he's the good guy.
Now
18 US code 1385.
US use of army, navy, marine corps, air
force, and space force. Now the national guard
come from army
or the air force, both of which it
seems have been used in this conversation.
So just understand this this applies.
And the posse comitatus, ultimately, as it says
here,
you you know, a posse we all know
what a posse is. Right? A group a
a grouping of people.
And so, basically, it says,
a
posse comitatus are otherwise to execute the law.
Oh, you know what? I thought this oh,
this is the wrong one. But, anyway, the
point, it it let's just do this since
I've claimed we could bring it up.
Give you the what the what the kind
of, like, concise definition is here. Oh,
you know what it's gonna do? I bet
she's gonna give me the definition we're looking
at here. Oh, no. It does. Okay. Good.
Oh, no. It just says posse. Anyway, the
point was it's basically the the oh, actually,
let's just do this. This will give it
to me.
So Kamatadah said, the action of sending a
person to an institution, especially prison or psychiatric
board or or hospital, a burial or corpse.
Well, that's interesting. Oh, that says committal. Damn
it. Anyway, I wanted to give you the
term for this because I I've talked about
it in the past.
Okay. So this is, you know, a war
band, a leader. You know, you get the
point. I'm just I I I've can't find
it. The point is simply that the idea
is about putting together a posse in, like,
an official sense. That's really what it come
down to, but I wanted to give you
the the the way that they write it
down. So my point is that when you
have
the president, the governor, anybody, ground get putting
together a group of people, whether the especially
when it comes to law enforcement, which is
the point of this. Right? So there the
term is used otherwise. This applies to when
they're taking military
as a posse, as a, you know, coming
grabbing them from multiple states and putting them
into the sea to execute certain things. That's
exactly what this means. Now, it says whoever,
except in cases
and under circumstances
expressly authorized by the constitutional act of Congress,
neither of which apply. That's the point. The
state of emergency does not somehow change that,
especially since it's an illegitimate state of emergency,
but it says whoever willfully uses any part
of the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps Air
Force, that's both National Guard included,
as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute
the laws
shall be fined under this title and imprisoned.
They're executing laws. Now you go you go
deeper on this as in particular, it has
to do with when you're crossing state lines,
especially when it comes to the national guard.
There's sort of a loophole within that we've
talked about in the past. There's really no
way around this.
You've heard them, though. We declare an emergency.
We can claim that somehow that's now within
the constitution, and that's what they argue. Now
we're gonna get into why they argue that.
This is the loophole they've tried to create.
Now this is from Protect Democracy from last
year. Bring the national this is before this.
They were already calling this out saying clearly,
they're right. They knew they predicted this was
coming.
Bring the National Guard's title 32 status in
line with the constitution.
So the point is the title 32 status
in and of itself is unconstitutional,
but so too are tons of other things
this government allow.
In June 2020, the press the Trump administration
so just like a lot of these in
the previous administration,
Trump took the unprecedented position that state governors,
under title 32,
of The US code can deploy their National
Guard units into other jurisdictions without those jurisdictions'
consent. That's the first part.
Right? So he did it then, and now
he's employing it now. Almost like they had
planned this a long time ago.
This radical interpretation of the law threatens state
sovereignty and raises serious constitutional concerns. Now that
goes into, like, California, for example. And, no,
Gavin Newsom is a monster. And you know
I've talked about that a lot. Doesn't change
the reality of the state and the state's
rights, which is that they are the the
idea is that you're not allowed to circumvent
that. This the idea of the federal government
in almost any case circumventing the rule of
the governor in regard to the state itself
outside of, like, military deployment and a few
other cap it's just it's it's we've gone
so far beyond that, and we see that
every day. And it's not just left it's
not just Trump. It's Biden. It's Obama. The
idea that they have just wildly ignored states'
rights, whether it comes to cannabis laws or
any number of things. I could go on
forever. It's a very important point. I mean,
in fact, you can go back to the
idea of the civil war, which in my
opinion was largely around states' rights, not slavery.
That was one aspect of it. And that's
you know, and that was one of the
reasons that was you know, that it came
down to the the fight is Now I
I would point out that others would argue
that it was more about the Southern states
recognizing they were losing control
in in congress and wanted to, you know,
break off to make sure that they were
still powerful. That's a fair point to make.
But overall, I think it was all it's
kind of the same conversation at the end
of the day. Right? They recognized they were
losing the ability to manage their own locations
and they fought back. You know, but people
dispute it, consider it for yourself. So the
point is, it also creates a dangerous loophole
in the Posse Comitatus Act. Right? That's the
real point here, Is that doing this title
32
is, like, almost exclusively to create the loophole
that makes you circumvent
this act that would make deploying the military
for civil civilian enforcement a crime.
Why are we okay with that? And it
says, which prohibits the military from enforcing civilian
laws except in situations expressly authorized by the
Constitution or Congress, because it means that the
president can use the military for law enforcement
purposes anywhere in the country so long as
they have one willing governor. The point is
that's that is the loophole they've created,
and that's what we're seeing. Right? It's I
mean and this was called out before it
happened, so it's very clear how this is
going forward.
Now here's an interesting overlap. This is from
2012.
Obama's plan to seize control of our economy
and our lives. Now you should read this.
There's plenty of point that I think are
kind of off the path, but the main
point,
president Obama has made clear that he's determined
to continue pushing his progressive agenda
regardless of constitutional limitations, on his power.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it? He aims to have
his way by issuing more and more executive
orders. Whew. That sure sounds familiar.
The most ominous sign of possible things to
come appear on March '12 when Obama signed
executive order one three six zero three
about national defense resources preparedness.
Funny how those things are like all these
terms, preparedness, now you know the 10 page
document is a blueprint for federal takeover of
the economy. Now more than that, but this
is how it was framed then.
Well, you could read it. I mean, it's
literally what I we're watching today. And so
my point is if you read oh, well,
I should read this next one too.
Trump's National Guard plot is an Obama era
conspiracy.
Now,
as I said before, I don't what they're
claiming in this article, I don't think is
accurate. Now
there's plenty of points I think you could
argue might have been, you know, the typical
mainstream alternative media kind of hyperbolic statements or
subjective and assumptive claims. But at the end
of the day, about the real power shift,
I think this is whether left or right,
Trump or Obama or Biden has been a
goal for the government to shift into this
kind of authoritarian control. It's not secret.
It's very obvious when you look back at
their own documentation.
But what's interesting is that what we're seeing
literally is this. Now despite this guy framing
it as sort of the Obama side was
a conspiracy, it's exactly the what we're talking
about in reverse.
He's refuses to look at what Obama was
actually doing and says that was a fake
story, but here's Trump doing that. And the
Republicans are going, Trump's not doing that. He's
fighting for freedom. Obama was the one who
tried to do it. You know, it's like
this and they're the ones ruining this country
because they refuse to look at the full
picture. Here's what it says. During Barack Obama's
presidency,
conspiracy theorists love to say he would soon
declare martial law, which in many ways he
borderline did, if not did, in specific locations.
Or the idea of things like the Smith
Modernization
Act or the idea of being able to
detain American citizen indefinitely. Like, these are all
variations of the same conversation.
Now it says Wingnut specialized Obama
oh, excuse me, speculated Obama would use anti
Trump protests as an excuse to march the
US military into the streets.
According to the wild theories,
he'd used the coming riots to cling to
power should the Donald win. Even
even
some even warned that shadowy brokers would play
professional rioters. Isn't that interesting?
Believers pointed to abandoned Walmarts along the side
highways, that would serve as steam accounts, which
by the way, there's very clear evidence suggest
there is not every single one, but there's
point that are not there
there is real plans for stuff like this.
We've talked about it. Or fevered in Internet
trolls posted pictures after picture of nondescript military
vehicles cruising along Texas highways. Well, guess what?
We covered that too, at least in some
cases. And you know us. This is not
based on some hyperbolic thing. This is a
very provable point. There's there was drone footage.
I mean, there there was documentation,
and the point was at this random Kellogg
factory. I forget exactly where it was. It
was in Maryland, interestingly enough. An entire unit
of heavily armed UN vehicles already on The
US soil in Maryland. Now there was narratives
for why, and maybe that's the case. You
can look at it for yourself. The point
was there was this very weird, like,
random spot where they just had this long
line of UN vehicles.
Here's a Trump post. If Chicago doesn't fix
the horrible carnage going on, look at that.
I will send in the feds. Well, it's
almost like we've been doing this before. That's
his post from 2017.
And interesting that we're talking about these same
like, my point from the other show, these
cities are not the places with the worst
crime, like, not the top you know, the
they all have bad crime, especially some of
the, like, Chicago, for example. But if you
break down the numbers,
the way they're going about this is not,
like, the top five.
So how does that make sense? And on
top of that, I think the reality of
these locations are because they're important to the
agenda, whether the AI technocratic rollout or some
other variation. I think that's what we're looking
at, and I find it very interesting that
this
tempt stems back to his last administration.
I was simply pointing out here all the
way back then, this will set a very
bad precedent, and I question whether Chicago was
made to be chaotic so to justify this
controversial step or at least pushed in the
right direction.
Official calls for UN peacekeepers to be deployed
on the streets of Chicago. That was happening.
They were literally calling for the deployment of
the and that's why it was relevant to
this conversation. Anyway, the point was not that
every story was true, but that there were
parts of this that were worthy of concern,
and they he's making out to be false.
Beige Humvees with black with new black helicopters.
You know? Everything's a conspiracy theory. The Associated
Press tweeted out that it had learned Trump
was considering the mobilization of 10,000 national guard
troops to enforce immigration policy
in 2017
or rather than just the last administration.
The fear was that Trump would send American
military into the cities to round up people
for mass deportation.
Sure turned out to be the reality.
Very interesting to me. Now, again, lot to
get to. There's more you can read in
this. The simple point is that the overarching
idea that they're calling out right now was
literally what was happening, at least being built.
And many of those pieces are what's is
what Trump's using today.
Handing off the baton just like Biden did
to Trump or rather Trump did to Biden,
and Biden did back to Trump with the
COVID agenda. It never stops.
Now here is an alarming clip. Trump's DC
crime crackdown is extremely successful. Right. So then
why are you deploying more troops and why
are you giving them weapons?
Sure doesn't make sense to me. Now realize
that they're not saying that we we crack
down on the crime and there's plenty more
to get. They're going like, look at how
empty it is. The crime is gone. At
least the grifters online, parroting what the people
like Miller and the rest are saying. So
you either you have to admit they're lying
to you about that to sell their narrative
or that they're telling you the truth and
then explain why they're putting more troops and
giving them weapons. But here's the clip. This
is from Fox News. And this expands this
quite a bit. It concerns a fathering US
army veteran. I knew I did that. Hold
on. I was looking at that earlier.
Hold on. I've got that somewhere.
It is
right there.
Here we go.
The Trump administration's ongoing efforts to combat crime
are showing promising results keeping our capital and
its citizens
safe. Oh, one point about this whole thing
you're gonna see
is this effort to, like, normalize,
you know, you know, they put, like, police
officers in schools and over the all the
and, like, the last decade, it's become normal.
That's weird.
Same thing here. The idea that all this
whole video is just these random, like, bee
clips of, like, you know, military lounging around
the park and military going up the escalator.
Why is that? They're just trying to make
it look like normal. They're just going there's
there's part of the world now. It's part
part of the part of the city. It's
how they were. I that that's the sense
I get from it. Yeah. I mean, this
making it safe again is not showing a
bunch of military roaming the streets. That's just
a weird mindset. It's a weird kind of
association with safe and military deployment. It's just
it still baffles me that Republicans are the
ones cheering this on.
Since president Trump announced his initiative, the White
House has reported over 700
arrests and 91 illegal guns seized so far.
Okay. So this is what I was saying
before.
Is that true?
Can you prove that? Maybe you can. Maybe
there's documents that I couldn't see. I couldn't
find it.
But my point is that I don't believe
you know, you know as well as I
do that the vast majority of people that
support this, they don't there's they see the
report and they go, oh, we did it,
and report. Next door order takes a a
clip and shares it online and says, we
did it. We're looking to look for stopping
without even the smallest amount of due diligence.
Despite the fact that they've got caught lying
about the vast majority of the alleged Doge
savings that they also all lied about,
right, or or any number of overlaps on
what they're doing in this country and foreign
policy about the deals they're making, on and
on about the
immigration we're gonna get to next. Lie after
lie. And I don't mean like an opinion.
Like, legitimate, like, in their face proven to
be lies, and they all just move forward,
or covering up the Epstein case. My point
is they're lying to you all over the
place. So why would we just assume those
numbers are accurate? I mean, they lied about
the immigration numbers in the first place. They
lied about everything.
So
I and my point is it wouldn't surprise
me. They're doing something, so there's probably people
being arrested. I just I wonder if we'll
come to find out those numbers were wildly
exaggerated or that 705
of them were a bunch of random people
in the wrong place at the wrong time
who barely even broke the law. It's this
is what we're seeing.
300 illegal aliens, of course, this is the
real point, I think, largely what they're trying
to accomplish. And I think what we all
come to find out,
a lot of the people they go after
are people that they're picked up on because
of things they posted online, because they said
the wrong thing about the Israel genocide.
It's not a joke. We've all seen it
from the way that's they started with Khalil
and Ozturk. The the the most obvious cases
of people that were literally not breaking the
law and arrested and and tried to be
deported anyway, both of which they failed. How
embarrassing. Garcia is now an example that we'll
get to in a minute.
Five known gang members. Well, seeing as how
they keep lying about people they claim are
gang members, like, another one just got exposed.
A trendy arago member we got, and they
posted about the DHS on Twitter, and then
they got proven to be false. He wasn't.
Like, literally proven that he was not part
of the gang, that they lied about where
he was. And, you know, on and on
and on.
Every single day I'm seeing these stories. And
it's not something I'm just going, I see
on Twitter and I share it. I look
it up. We check the source material. We
look at the the government's own documentation
and why they released him. Or the case
of the guy they surrounded his house after
they opened fire on his car,
claiming he was an illegal immigrant, then he
attacked the cops, and then they finally got
to him and then let him go. Why?
Because he was an illegal immigrant, because he
didn't do anything wrong. We're gonna believe that
if he they ran over cops, they would
just let him go because, oh, he's in
California.
It's it's
aggressive
how much they're lying.
So
91 firearms seized. Are you okay with that?
Shall not be infringed?
You realize what they're saying? Oh, god. Like,
seized illegal guns. What does that mean?
What's an illegal gun?
I mean, look. If we wanna break this
down to the real point of whether you
even think there should be permits because that's
clearly a violation of the second amendment, but
I know half the country disagrees.
The overarching point is that the half these
are probably people with marijuana violations or people
that don't have you know, that's not what
I believe in, and I'm sure as hell
know that most conservatives don't, but they'll just
pretend that part of it's not there. You
know, also like Trump saying,
take the guns, do process later, or the
bump stock ban, or all the very clear
unconstitutional second amendment things that they all pretend
aren't there. But, you know, I could fill
a
a warehouse with things that these people ignore.
With the crime crackdown gaining significant
momentum, could we be seeing a shift to
cities around the country? Yeah. You know, the
thing that they all swore wasn't gonna happen,
and now they're cheering it on. US marshal
service director Gatti Seralta joining us now. Director,
thank you for taking time. I think it's
really great to hear from you because
as the country's watch, these remarkable
results for taking time shift to cities around
the country.
US marshal service director Gaddy driving Marsh's I
wanna make sure US marshal service director. Wanna
get the make sure I had the full
I'm down.
I myself, a resident of DC, very glad
to see this. I've been there for over
thirty years, But I think, you know, it's
this sort of whole of federal law enforcement
that has brought this,
made it possible, not just Okay. So if
it goes beyond what they've already reported and
this is what they're claiming here,
all you know, that they're working with every
federal aspect of the state, then they're violating
this in incredible ways.
But my point is that you get these
these these, you know, elitist suits
going, it's so great what Trump is doing.
Look at how great it is that we
can we have to bump shoulders all the
peons every day. And then I hear from
most people on the ground, including Republicans, that
this is insane.
People getting accosted on their own on their
own steps. You know, people getting tackled because
they're filming the cops. It's everywhere. We're gonna
get into it in a second.
ICE or border patrol,
and now National Guard, but also the marshal
service. Talk to me about how it's all
I'm gonna be just to eat. No. I'll
let it play out because I want you
to hear all the things you're listening. I
need to list a bunch more.
Martial service? Like, why is this all necessary
To enforce the
law. I mean, look. If we're gonna pretend
this was gonna be some kind of, like,
gang standoff, well, that didn't happen. Right? They
just rolled in, arrested some people smoking on
their streets, and then just called it a
day.
So my point is that ultimately, if they're
working with marshall service and ICE and local
police and and the secret service that have
deputized
and the everybody, it's just like, what is
going if you don't see by now what
this is, again, it's it's kind of embarrassing,
to be honest.
As a unified team.
Well, not just ICE or sort of whole
of federal law enforcement
that has brought this,
made it possible, not just ICE or border
patrol,
and now National Guard, but also the marshal
service. Talk to me about how it's all
working as a unified team.
So it's a unified command structure.
It is led by the United States marshal
service,
and we're very proud of that.
But it it is a unified command. We
have 20 over 20
different federal law enforcement agencies.
You know, DEA,
FBI,
IRS.
You know, you you name it. You name
the federal agency, we got it here. Amtrak.
We have Okay. So what he's claiming is
that the marshal service is kind of leading
this all in some massive all federal enforcement
of the state or the city even.
Now there's a whole weird overlap to DC,
which I think is part of what they're
using to play this.
But now that they're rolling out to other
cities, that whole argument goes away. That somehow
there's, like, the which is the reality of
the kind of weird, like, limbo statehood for
DC.
It's the seat of congress. It's not technically
a state. They don't have the voting rights.
But the point is and many people have
wanted that to change over the years. That
that's what allows this kind of murky misunderstanding,
but now they're talking about New York and
Chicago.
There's no way around this.
That is insane. You're talking about an all
of federal government enforcement and talk where the
state's rights.
I mean, you could go on forever in
many example. You talk to anybody who was
an expert in the constitution. This is so
far over the top. I mean, this this
is what we've all warned about for a
very long time. So it's so funny to
me that the ones who always claim to
be the leaders of warning and being ahead
of things and predicting everything right are the
ones who are pulling punches right now and
ignoring this. Let's go invade Venezuela. You know,
freedom, democracy.
Have,
US park police
do a great
job. Daddy. So it's a it's a unified
thing. Daddy, help me understand how this would
work. So the national guard, the marshals, you
know, these extra forces that we don't normally
see in these cities come in, and they
they help get the crime down and then
they leave, or will we see a a
smaller presence remain? And then the other question
I have is we're hearing, you know, other
cities saying maybe Chicago. We should go to
Chicago, maybe Baltimore,
maybe New York City.
So is there enough resources to go around,
these of these extra research to go around
and and and help in all these cities?
Before he answers,
right, they go in and get the crime
down. What does that even mean?
Right? So how are you what metric do
you use to instantaneously,
like,
prove that crime is down, whatever that means?
Right? Yes. You stop some crimes you claim.
You arrested people you claim were criminals.
So how do you then go look at
look how far crime is down. What does
that even mean? What metric are you using?
Right? Are you still are you, like, real
time surveilling the streets and going look at
like, the idea is, yes, you can see
that people aren't in the streets, which is
weird to me. Why that's a positive note,
I don't know.
During the day too, by the way. It's
very weird.
At least on the time the the videos
that I've seen is it's of course, I
would argue it's during the midst of the
the massive crackdown.
But how do you then argue that crime
is just down? Wouldn't you have to, like,
wait a month and go look at what
the statistics show? Right? This is why all
I'm trying to show you is they're just
telling you what they want you to hear.
We'll have to wait to see how this
pans out to truly understand the the repercussions
of what actually happened.
But as always, left and right, they're just
narrative controllers. These morons and their blow dried
hair and their average you know, these fake
informers sitting there in their suits and green
shirt and green dress, they don't I I
argue that it's so far outside the know,
they just repeating what they're told to this
point. And you I feel like you can
see it. Compare them to, like,
propagandists
of twenty years ago. And, yes, I do
argue they were still propagandists, but look at
the difference.
Look at the way that they presented themselves
as as on as, you know, they very
well presented themselves, pretended to be honest and
and had decorum and they were respected. These
people are just clowns today. Why? I think
because nobody wants to be there anymore because
it's ridiculous and we all see through them.
Now the question,
resources, how long will they stay?
How can we do this? Like, how can
we make this happen is kind of where
it fell from her point.
Well, yes. There there there are agents that
and and marshals and and national guard from,
from various states that that are available.
But here, we're here for for the period
that the president has us here for. No.
Like, the see my point? Look at the
background, this b roll image. Yeah. Just note
it's casual. Just military going let's go right.
We're high fiving with people walking by. Hooray,
military.
That's that's what they're doing right there. And
I can tell you, it's been extremely successful
thus far.
You know, we are bringing our intelligence capabilities.
We're bringing our our,
investigative,
assets,
our tools. We're working together. Oh, cool. Well,
so now now we've got, like, investigations ongoing.
Right? So now you're talking about federal investigations
taking place. Like, this is expanding so far
beyond, you know, enforcing instantaneous crime. Remember when
I said that? Remember my point was when
I got all the pushback from idiots online
about the warrantless arrest powers? When I said,
well, they're clearly doing far more than just
walking down the streets to the billy clubs
and forcing people breaking the law. Oh, you
crashed a window, going to jail because that's
what National Guard's for. Right? They're not doing
that only. They're investigating. They're carrying out action.
They are going after people profiling them because
they have brown skin. All of them. The
videos are out there. You can't hide from
this.
So that clearly expanded this. So then they're
going at this as if they don't need
warrants for anything.
By the way, which we can all prove,
ICE is continually ignoring identifying themselves or giving
warrants almost in any circumstance. They were trying
to force their way into that barbershop on
video until they got surrounded and they left
because, good, they were trying to break the
law.
But this is my point about these people
cheering on authoritarian,
unconstitutional
action and then claiming they're somehow the MAGA
Freedom Team fighting for the country. It's insane.
Or they're just too dumb to know they're
wrong.
With the Metropolitan Police Department,
to to,
deploy in a intelligence based manner,
in order to to combat crime as quickly
and as efficiently as possible. And we've we've
gotten a lot of results. I want you
to know,
we're very proud of the fact that we
we we crossed the triple digit mark with
firearms. You know? We we have a 101.
You're the Republicans? They've seized a whole lot
of firearms because that's what you all support.
Right?
And as of last night, a 101 guns.
You know? So How many lives did we
save with those 101 guns? Who knows?
Yeah. Or you could argue how many were
lost because they couldn't defend themselves or because
they weren't there to fight off lone shooters
or whatever. Like, these are just the arguments
that you typically when Democrats were going after
our guns. Funny how this always works out.
Now look,
if you're gonna if you're gonna exist in
the state of society and then ignore that
it violates the second amendment to have somehow
the limitations on your gun ownership and you
care and you believe that, okay. That's up
to you.
Then you could argue that, yes, they'll these
in these cases, they are breaking the law.
But can you prove that? Right? Did you
did you watch them? Do they have did
they break them down for you? Like, I'm
just saying, we don't get anything verified. They
put out numbers on a screen. They claim
they've taken a bunch of guns, and you
guys are cheering on things that are counterintuitive
to what you're always talking about.
I just need think that's important to point
out.
So when you're walking,
on the ground there and you hear from
your men and women who are on the
ground there, what is it that is so
effective
about this strategy,
you know, in a in a real sense,
like in a boots on the ground kinda
way
that has led to these positive results? Okay.
That guy's bad at his job.
Funny.
Well, our our AG,
Pam Panalabandi,
and,
and and Janine Pirro, the the, US attorney
here,
are are very tough on crime. Right? So
what we're doing is we're we're utilizing the
federal statutes,
to the maximum,
while we do our our investigative work. Now
not all cases go federal.
That's unfortunate
because Okay. Remember the question was, how does
this effective?
You see, that's interesting to me that he
just veered hard away from the question. Well,
Bondi and them are hard on crime, you
know, so obvious. Next question.
Okay.
That's I I think it's very interesting. You
know, when we get to the later conversation
that Democrats or we'll probably both sides will
happily ignore, which will tell you something despite
how they're supposed to hate Trump and go
after him all the time. When we get
to that point, when we're gonna be talking
about effectiveness and whether this had the result
they claimed,
what do we do with Doge? They lied
about it all the time, and then the
the screamers online backed it up. Now you
can look back and prove they lied to
you, but we're so far past that. Get
a are we still talking about Epstein?
That's where we are every time. The DC
council has a no cash bail,
that I'm hoping the president and and the
AG, work together to to do away because
that that that is what's happening
to DC, to Metropolitan Police. You know? Right.
The cops grab the bad guy. They put
him in, and the bad guy comes out
the other side, continues their crime spree. Oh
oh, so you mean you wanna stop them
from having the legal right to put a
bail to come out even though the judge
said it was okay?
Yeah. Okay. So that's a crime, by the
way. Like, just arbitrarily
declaring that people aren't allotted the rights everyone
else has because circumstances.
These people are criminals, and these are small
cases in the larger picture. But understand, what
they're doing is to cultivate a very clear
picture.
Because let's say they arrest somebody for doing
something benign, and they just have a number
on a screen of 700 evil, mad, rapist
criminals,
and they just end up going out. Like,
these are the things that will show in
the in the long run that they were
lying to you. It's all hypothetical. I don't
know what to wait and see how the
numbers come out, but I find it interesting
the way this is being engaged with.
Right. Yeah. And it also demoralizes
the law enforcement as well. I mean, you
just after a certain amount of getting the
guy and then they release him, you just
go, why am I even doing this? Right.
Exactly. Lastly, real quick, Drake. Right. Because the
the broad assumption is that they're all evil
monsters because you arrested them. You know, like
the people that were breaking no laws that
you sent to El Salvador or the many
different people you arrest because they have a
piece of plant in their pocket. You know,
the idea is that we're supposed to blindly
accept that. Isn't that, you know, this kind
of, like,
bootlicker mentality?
Right? That we just I mean, it weren't
they framing themselves at the moment as the
ones fighting the the power?
I just start self reflecting here, guys. This
is the power. Sure. So I wanna ask
you. I I saw the White House posted
a stat that they've now had nine consecutive
days without a single murder
in DC.
Are are you hearing from any of the
DC residents directly,
or are your men and women hearing from
them that that are are glad that this
is the case?
Right.
What a what a softball. Right? Well, if
anybody's gonna reach out and then and it's
the fact that there's no murder, I'm pretty
sure anyone's gonna be like, that's good, if
that's true.
It's just a funny thing to say. Like,
my point is, I'm gonna bet you they
haven't contacted anybody, but the narrative's gonna be
yes. Everyone's telling us it's great. Like Trump
says, everyone's contacting me going, please, Trump, do
whatever my narrative is today. Don't believe it.
He's lying about a lot of stuff. Like,
please, Trump, make deals with me. That turned
out to be false.
The overarching point
in regard to the
oh, god darn it. Sorry. The podcast, I
just accidentally put this back too far. Hold
on. That that are are glad that this
is the case? Yeah. There we go.
Hearing from any of the DC residents? Now
before I keep playing the point, I just
wanna get my start again. The point was
about the the murder in regard to the
claim of
how many are normally there. Now if you
look back at past years, I think it
was, like, four or five, which is what
they said in the same time frame. And
now they've had ten days without it, which
is good objectively. No murder. Good. Right? It's
not hard to point out. But
it's the same point they make with El
Salvador. So you roll out military martial law
on the streets. You arrest people for doing
the most benign of things, so you set
a tone. If you're outside, you're gonna get
accosted.
Do you think criminals who are aware of
that are gonna go out and conduct crime?
No. I mean, this isn't a fake
impression. Now in in El Salvador, it's the
same kind of thing except what they did
was make deals with the criminals. They literally
made a deal with MS thirteen in order
to effectively make it look like crime went
down. And they've suspended civil liberties. They have
martial law. Oh, weird. Just like we're doing
here, it seems. The point overall is that
this is an illusion.
Even if they are like, the not that
you have the less crime because or, like,
you know, let me find the metrics. I'm
sure it'll pan out. It's like with COVID
nineteen. Right? Everybody was off the street, so
suddenly everything's great. No. It's just that they
just stopped going out. And when this dissipates,
people will go back out, which I guarantee
you will be the rationale for why this
doesn't go away.
I just think it's important to think about.
Just because no one's on the streets doesn't
mean everything's changed.
Directly,
or are your men and women hearing from
them that that are are glad that this
is the case?
Well, I can tell you, I I go
out every night. Right? I go out every
night, and, and I do talk to the
residents
and the passerbys,
and they thank us. You know, we we
consistently
Do you believe that?
No. Look. I'm I would I'm willing to
bet anything. You'll find some residents that would
probably thank them. But do you actually believe
that he goes out every night and talks
to people on the street? I flatly don't
believe that. These people are so far they
look at you like you're the peons. You're
the serfs. Right? You are they are a
different species half the time in their mind.
So I just think it's funny to me.
Now maybe not him in particular. My point
though is nonetheless, even if he's not in
that elitist 1% upper class,
these people don't do that.
I just I mean, it's just you can
look in any context. They other they'll send
out a patrolman. Right? I just think
it's kinda sad that they always wanna project
that you they're just like you. Look. I
play the guitar. I'm just like you, and
half the time is not the case. Just
my thought. Here. Thank you for being out
here.
We appreciate you. You guys are doing a
great job. You know, those are all those
are all some of the some of the
commentary that we hear from the people. Now
interestingly enough, I was at Union, station not
too long ago, two two or three days
back. And there was a a a guy
that was yelling at us. And, you know,
I got enough out of him to find
out that, you know, he he came here
from from Pennsylvania.
So, you know, it seems to me that
the ones that are complaining are not even
from here, and the residents are extremely happy
that we're here. Same point.
Is that true? Who
knows? Knowing how often they lie, you never
but is it is it relevant that the
person who is unhappy with your unconstitutional actions
is somehow from a different state? Pretty sure
we all exist under the constitution or at
least we we all agree with the inherent
rights of the constitution or at least people
do.
Funny point to make. He does even from
here, so it doesn't matter even though they're
currently deploying to multiple states in the country.
Right?
Interesting argument.
So we're we're you know, these agencies and
our agents are doing a great job. I'm
very proud to be, leading this in in
this capacity, and,
and we're gonna get crime down and stamp
the way in in in DC here soon.
Alright. Oh, but I thought you said it
already did, though. Trump's been circling the ground.
We did. It's over. We go. The crowd's
gone. It's all down. Look how empty the
streets are. You see, the narrative is whatever
they need. In the moment, right there, they
want you to know what's happening. We're gonna
get there. Stick with it. It's gonna go
on for a long time. Maybe six months,
maybe a year, maybe an extension. We'll find
out. But just we're doing it for you.
Then you you you have massive protests, by
the way, of people out there protesting this
what's going on.
Local people who then Matt Miller Steve Miller.
Dang it. Steven Miller. I keep saying I
always talk about Matt Miller. Steven Miller, I
showed you in the last show, calls a
bunch of white hippies,
bunch of 90 year old women that aren't
even from here,
which how the world he could possibly know
that? And then secondarily, you can quite literally
prove that you have locals out there protesting.
And yet all he wants to do is
tell the people who have weapons who are
now being pointed at them that they're all
a bunch of monsters that don't that are
manipulating everybody.
You know, says the Zionist who wants to
destroy this country.
I think that's very alarming. Most importantly, because
of the idea that this is
an all of federal response from IRS down
to Amtrak.
Very different than what we're being told right
now.
Now let's not forget on top of that
what we already showed you from the twelfth.
Pentagon plan would to be create to create
a reaction force for civil unrest.
Literally
facing protests or other unrest is how the
Washington post frames that. So now apparently, protesting
is considered unrest, which is what Trump said
before. I played it last time. If you
protest, you'll be met with violent force
or serious force.
Well, since I said that, let's make sure
we play it to get it correct on
the record.
Big on Saturday. We're gonna have a lot
of and if there's any protest that wants
to come out, they will be met with
very big force. Very big force. By the
way, and for those people that wanna protest,
they're gonna be met with very big force.
And Now this is from the last time.
Right? This is before the I think it
was the LA point, but it's the same
thing. He's literally telling you that you can't
protest or we're gonna go after you. Now
he also, in an executive order, made it
clear in particular for DC, by the way,
in March,
because he totally didn't plan to do this
in DC. Because in March, he literally wrote
out for DC that there's exemptions for these
pro like, you could basically argue that certain
protests are invalid.
It's in it's embarrassing how clear it is
if you just care to look at the
full picture. This is not some reaction to
what's that. This is a planned out effort.
Now many of them will be okay with
that, even though the way they frame it
in public says otherwise. But they're okay with
that too because you gotta lie because Democrats,
you know. That's it's all rationalized by bad
other side, both of them.
This is about a reactionary force that won't
go away, and it says about 600 troops,
probably gonna be triple that for all we
know, in two main locations in the country
that get rapidly deployed should there be protests
they don't like.
Welcome to Trump's America. Or, really, the point
is, this is aimed at people that need
to hear that, the US government.
Biden, Trump, Obama,
Bush, same damn thing.
Of course, next order comes out and says
DC now has 10 gone ten days without
a single homicide.
Thanks to president Trump.
During the same day last period, they had
five.
And liberals hate this.
You know, I and probably just as many
ridiculous liberals hate a positive thing if that's
what actually happened, just like Republicans hate when
Biden does something that looks good or ends
up positive because they're all children,
especially people just like him.
The point is, I don't believe that's the
majority. I don't believe even remotely that most
liberals are going, no. Might want murder. It's
just a dumb way to frame it. They
don't like the way you're going about it,
and that's the point I wanna make.
Look. Like, on top of what I said
before, if you are rolling out military martial
law, if you're if you're just deploying military
to enforce law, whatever you wanna call it,
and you effectively reduce crime or lower murder
to zero,
it matters how you get there. And he
would say the same thing if it was
Obama or Biden, and you damn well know
it. The point is you're rolling out martial
law on the streets so people aren't gonna
be out there. And so you're doing an
unconstitutional
act. You are violating in foundational parts of
this country and then going, look how great
it is because of the outcome. Well, you
know, we've already talked about that. We talked
about it in the last show as well.
The Machiavellian mindset that Trump already referenced with
his Napoleon quote that if I'm saving the
country, there is no law I'm breaking. It's
all back to the same stuff. It is
the Curtis Yarvin, Alex Karp, and well, really,
the Curtis Yarvin philosophy, the Alex Karp, Peter
Thiel, Marc Andreessen, all of them, Lonsdale, they
all have the same mindset, and they are
all driving a large part of what we're
seeing. In fact, you know my opinion. I
think most of this is about this rapid
technocratic change out of this country. Nonetheless,
you have to recognize
that it's just one big manipulation.
And and and and, you know, for on
top of it all, illegal and unconstitutional.
True Street Media says this is a flex
of unitary executive theory, a consolidation of power
in the president via historically illiterate interpretations of
our constitution
that we've been building for over a century
as we we transition
back into the very thing our founding fathers
sought to avoid.
Very well put and very sad
how many people pretend. This is my point
though about the Knicks of the world. I
don't think they
care. They they they it's like with Musk
or any of the rest or Stephen Miller.
They wear that MAGA badge because they want
well, I'm it's it's like that meme
of, Speed Bucemi with the hat. Hello, fellow
kids. You know, that's what they're doing. And
they're just they're giving you what you wanna
see. So you think they're these big leaders
and they clearly don't care about the principle
behind it.
Trump says it, and it's the good thing
no matter what.
Fight it. Call it out.
No better example than this because this is
so
vindictive.
Just, I mean, trying desperately I mean, even
at a point when most people are looking
elsewhere right now, they're just desperate to make
this person pay because they because they look
stupid.
That's genuinely what I feel is driving this,
if not the larger point about whatever. I
mean, I also really do think it's because
and I'll point this out in the article.
He knows what happened in El Salvador.
Almost everyone that's come back has told you
there was rape, torture,
horrifying human rights violations. They've that are it's
not by accident. It's the policy.
There's a whole breakdown. I read a whole
article about this well before this. This is
what they're doing. In fact, this is a
brief point I'll show you right here.
First, this
article. Abrego Garcia says Trump administration using threatening
use using threatened deportation
to Uganda
to coerce him to give a guilty plea.
Right.
The justice system. The idea is they're simply
saying, you do what we want, and we'll
give we'll send you to a place where
you can be free. But wait. Didn't you
tell us that he was a criminal, a
human trafficking MS 13 terrorist monster,
but you're making a deal with him to
be free in another country?
Sort of like you're making a deal with
Jillian Maxwell, a human trafficker. You know? They
they're lying about Garcia, by the way. The
point is that that we know Maxwell is
the is clearly a criminal, and now they're
trying to turn her to the victim and
give her and let her go free. Garcia,
they're trying to send away to a foreign
country, but if he's willing to plead guilty,
they're claiming at the very least that they'll
send him somewhere where he can go free.
I'll read it to you right now. On
top of that,
if he doesn't plead guilty, well, we're gonna
send you somewhere where you're gonna suffer.
Freedom. Democracy. Now, of course, all the morons
out there that wanna scream somehow that these
people who don't have constitutional rights fundamentally don't
understand the constitution, which which explains why they
are cheering on martial law.
But as always, if you care to look
it up, whether it is a illegal alien,
a visa holder, green card holder, or an
American citizen, naturalized or otherwise,
they have constitutional rights.
It is amazing how far we've gone that
we can't even,
like, understand that fundamental
point. Gilmore Greg Garcia, the man illegally deported
to El Salvador in March and returned in
June to face human smuggling charges that he
denies. And on top of that, by the
way, that the judge had multiple judges,
left and right, by the way, despite the
claims they make about leaning left judges.
Half of this conversation was was including the
Supreme Court, which is, I think, the majority
of conservative
judges have leaned in his favor. The point
is that,
the smuggling charges that he said
were or rather, excuse me, the judge said
were,
like, in, I think it was, physically impossible
or some variation therein. Because the numbers they
gave would've and they did this in the
court. They it would've amounted to him driving,
like, seven days a week all day long
for the whole time, which is just stupid.
It's not what actually happened. You can prove
it. And so they made up numbers. I
argued back then because there was a certain
number they probably needed to, like,
go to a certain threshold.
My point is they lied. They lied about
the human trafficking claims because they wanted to
kick this further. They wanted them to seem
a big bad guy. They lied about the
MS 13 charges. They've lied about all of
it. All of it has come out in
court, but the screaming Republicans who don't care
will go with what Trump said on day
one.
Despite him getting embarrassingly caught screaming at a
news per at a, mainstream journalist that the
MS 13 was tattooed on his knuckles, which
was just embarrassing
because it wasn't.
And he wasn't saying the images. He was
saying the numbers, the letters were there, as
anybody with the brain can see, as he
said himself in the interview two times. And
he and he's wrong. It's not. And on
top of that, experts left and right have
acknowledged that what was on there didn't mean
what they said it did, or that in
most cases, they don't even use them like
that. But all of this is so far
beyond us that we're don't doesn't matter to
people that wanna hear what they wanna hear.
He's accused the Trump administration of attempting to
coerce him into a guilty plea by threatening
to re deport him to Uganda.
Now as attorneys for Abrego said in a
Saturday court filing, the justice department is pressuring
him to accept a guilty plea to two
felony counts of things he did not do
according to the judges and everything else we've
seen so far, promising to deport him to
Costa Rica where he would be free from
incarceration.
Of course, right? So he's a terrible person
that we need to put away right now
because he's killing everybody. He's a danger to
the country, but we'll set him free as
long as you give us the plea that
makes it look like we won. Isn't that
just insane? These people are so petty and
small. It's it's just insulting.
In conjunction with the proposal,
the government produced a letter to mister Abrego's
counsel,
confirming that he could live freely in that
country,
which would accept him as a refugee
or grant him residency status
and promise not to refoul him, where we
had to write that, to El Salvador.
This is the what his lawyers put out.
But after Garcia Abrego Garcia resisted that proposal,
the immigration and ICE officials
told his lawyers that they had decided instead
to deport him to Uganda. Government officials informed
Abrego's lawyers that the Costa Rica option would
remain on the table if he pledged guilty.
It's exactly how I just framed it. And
and the whole point about Uganda is that
they do get into is that's that's the
bad side of it. Right? You're gonna you're
gonna go to jail or whatever. They they
go to Costa Rica though. We made a
deal for you already. You can be free.
It says there can only there can be
only one interpretation of these events.
The DOJ, the DHS, and ICE are using
their collective powers to force mister Abrego to
choose between a guilty plea
followed by relative safety or rendition to Uganda,
where his safety and liberty would be under
threat.
That's what his attorneys wrote. And remember, again,
guys, the courts thus far and even the
US government has been forced to acknowledge Rubio
and the rest in court that they did
not have the case they claimed they did,
but they'll sure as hell scream what they
want you to hear in public.
Now it says the allegation by,
Brago's lawyers comes a day after Brago was
released from a Tennessee jail, where he had
been held since returning to The US in
June. Now remember, they his old lawyers petitioned
to keep him there for a while when
he could have actually gotten out in in
before ever what comes next because they were
threatening to deport him. And they had to
get some kind of, like, promises they wouldn't
and they still didn't believe them. Like, their
own DOJ lawyer said, look, we don't wanna
do this because we're worried that the that
ICE is gonna take him anyway. I mean,
these are lawyers that just understand how bad
that makes them look. Not you know, and
and yet they know the government doesn't care.
And so they've let him stay. But now,
eventually, they they just let him out. And
then right after it because they already promised
they weren't gonna do this. And then right
after he got out, they dumped this in
his lap. You know? And now they're letting
him decide, apparently.
It says, he is being instructed to report
to a Baltimore ICE
field office
first thing Monday. That's tomorrow.
So he's like I mean, in what world
is you're gonna go I mean, look at
what they're doing around the country right now.
You're gonna go report to ICE. You're gonna
end up back in El Salvador. They don't
have they clearly, they do not care about
accountability.
The Ugandan government, this is interesting,
announced earlier this week that it had reached
an agreement with president Trump to accept third
country deportees. Yeah. That's still happening, by the
way. From The US, the African nation's foreign
minister said the country will not accept
individuals with criminal records and unaccompanied minors.
Oops. So how does that work out? So
you're trying to tell us that he's a
criminal that you're gonna send to a foreign
country, but they're telling you we won't accept
criminals.
So, really, what it breaks down to is
they know this person's not guilty. They know
what they've been trying to do. And all
they're trying to do right now is kind
of coerce this into something they can wave
around and say, we knew it. He pled
guilty. We always told you he was a
criminal, monster terrorist,
human trafficking, you know, whatever, like the most
hyperbolically they can claim.
And yet either way you look at this,
it's clear that they are acknowledging that's not
the case, which is just so embarrassing.
Abrego was asking a federal judge in Tennessee
to dismiss the criminal case against him, saying
the smuggling charges are corrupted by an overtly
vindictive drive by the Trump administration to punish
him.
Last month, Abrego described his experience. Now this
is I think this is part of this,
guys. Even to the point to where they're
willing to say, we'll let you go somewhere
else, be free, I think that there's a
huge problem
with what people are divulging about what's happening
in El Salvador. And on top of that,
that more and more it's slipping out that
Boukule has made a deal with the people
they claim they're fighting.
And the US government is a part of
that. At least at the very at the
very least, Trump's administration is, but I think
it's going I think it's all of it.
And I think that's an issue. Like, that's
already happened with the earlier MS thirteen guy
that they rushed back to El Salvador because
he was about to testify in court in
The United States. We talked about that a
while ago. And then after that, I think
a couple months later, they they deported, like,
13 leaders of MS thirteen back. These are
people they're working with.
It's insane. But Republicans will just flatly deny
that despite how easily you can prove that.
Even the US government itself has admitted that
case before we got here.
Now it says,
he experienced at in El Salvador,
severe beatings, sleep deprivation, malnutrition,
and other forms of torture at the hands
of jailers.
Now we've had round like, from the from
the barber who was there and plenty of
others, rape. He said he was forced to
give sex you know?
But I don't he was he was forced
to do a sexual act with a guard.
I just didn't wanna be, you know, crude
about it.
And that and and that's consistent with people
well before this this
this overlap with Trump's administration.
It goes back a long way.
And the point is that he's telling you
the same thing. Now people will dismiss him
because he's a human trafficker even though you
can prove that's not true. But the point
is that you can prove this. And it
says others released from that prison in a
recent US brokered exchange between El Salvador and
Venezuela have described similar experiences.
Administration officials have accused Garcia, Abrego, of being
an MS thirteen gang member and a foreign
terrorist.
Alabell Garcia, I keep saying, Abrego Garcia vehemently
denies and that federal judges have suggested is
based on flimsy evidence. I hate the way
they said that. They don't suggest that. There's
been numerous judges left and right who have
said this is just ridiculous.
Like, laugh out loud absurd what you're trying
to present as evidence.
So that's just a a soft play on
that. But it says shortly after his release
on Friday, DHS secretary Nick Christy Noem
decried activist liberal judges because that's what they
do.
Democrat,
except for the fact that it was both.
Right? But it's only the ones that are
democrat that are the ones we're calling out.
Now they want people to think it's only
democrats, and that's why it's not happening.
It's a lazy, easy argument like everything else
we're talking about.
No democrat hoax
for the Epstein. No democrats lied about him.
No democrat holdover that we didn't arrest, so
we'll pretend like he was actually there.
I don't know how anybody's falling for this
stuff.
It says, we will not stop fighting until
this Salvadorian man faces justice as an out
of our country.
So as long as they get him somewhere
else, that's what they're gonna claim happened. That's
what they're trying to set up right now.
A federal grand jury has charged Greg Garcia
with serious federal crimes,
a DOJ spokesperson said
in in a statement, this defendant can plead
guilty and accept responsibility
or stand trial in a jury. Don't you
love the way they're kind of framing it
at that? He's guilty and we know it.
So but but jury, where that's where that
would be decided. Right? This is sneaking faith
responsibility
for a allegation.
They just they just play on the ignorance
of average people. That's what they do, which
shows you how dishonest they are at its
at their core.
State department
is lying about El Salvador. This is from
2025.
Now it
says, earlier this month, the state department released
its annual county reports on human rights practices.
Country reports, excuse me, which provide nation by
nation human rights analysis
about the previous year.
Such reports often reveal political compromises, which in
and of itself are disgusting that write like
like, make a deal with Israel, and we'll
downplay you how bad you are, which happens
every day. But distinct from past years, the
department under Marco Rubio
has dramatically distorted the human rights records of
abusive governments
with whom The US has tested interest. Now
here's what's crazy. They do that every time.
I've talked about this so many times over
the years. They do it with Saudi Arabia.
They do it with Somalia. Again, should they
make deals with Israel or or, you know,
all of them. It's it's it's everywhere you
look. And it's not just Israel. It's just
any number of overlapping points where they work
with them or, you know, they now suddenly,
how much you wanna bet? Syria is gonna
be downgraded even though it's worse than ever.
It's because it's just manipulation. The point is
that today with Rubio and Trump, it's worse
than even normal.
Now it says, this includes especially El Salvador,
of course, about whom the state department is
frankly lying to the international community.
Now, of course, you could do the lazy
thing and go, well, it's the hill, so
they're lying, which I would also argue. They
lie all the time like any platform in
the mainstream does or mainstream has heard of
media. But you can also prove this. And
I've gone over this from left, from right,
from people in El Salvador. It's not hard
to see.
It says, I sir and this is the
person writing this. I serve as an expert
witness on country conditions in El Salvador for
The United States immigration courts when people are
applying for asylum or protection under the constant
the convention against torture.
To do so, I swear under oath that
oops, that I am
where was I? Right there.
How did I just lose that? There it
is. I swear under oath that I am
telling the truth, but in my written reports
and orally when called to testify. He's simply
just saying, which, you know, that's that's to
me, that doesn't mean much. People can lie
regardless of the circumstances. My point is that
but whether or not he has, like, a
he's under oath, it may make you feel
like he might be more honest, but you
should question it regardless. That's what I mean.
It's to me, it's about the statement and
whether you can prove it, you can investigate
it for yourself. And I think you can
do both of those things. Now it says
the alliance between Trump and El Salvador's president,
Bukele, has been very much in the news.
El Salvador's sale of space in its prisons
to help The US expel immigrants provides a
clear motive for the state department to claim
that there's no human rights abuses in these
prisons.
Yet, this is in direct conflict with reports
from human rights organizations, just like every other
story they're being told, that refute many of
the claims made in the department's reports.
In light of new information about its reporting
on country conditions in El Salvador, I fear
I can no longer rely on the US
State Department as a credible source. Well, welcome
to the team.
It's reports for El Salvador states that there
are no credible reports of significant human rights
abuses in the country. That's in that's that's
shockingly false.
It says, I beg to differ. A long
list of human rights organizations like, Chris Dossol,
which I think is one local to the
to the country, human rights human rights watch,
Human Rights First, Amnesty International,
all attest to the same thing.
Incarcerated
Salvadorians
are packed into grossly overcrowded cells, beaten regularly
by prison personnel, and denied medicines, all easily
proven with multiple cases. Inmates are frequently subjected
to punishments including food deprivation, electric shocks. Such
systemic abuses have not yet improved.
He
remember, Bukele is a proud Zionist. Now that
matters to me because of where these connections
are and who seems to have, like, like,
embodied this kind of treatment for the other
in their society.
The leaked reports are consistent with Rubio's recent
efforts to have certified El Salvador as taking
measures to uphold the law and self serving
move
to con that that that also contradicts the
facts on the ground.
They're being lied to.
I think this is very relevant to point
out. Bennie Johnson says, breaking.
ICE has notified MS thirteen
terrorist Garcia that he may be deported.
I just it just makes me sad. Like,
at one point, you just get angry. Like,
oh, you lying. He's influencing his millions of
followers with flatly incorrect information. But it's just
sad, isn't it? Like, it's just like, okay.
You could say that this person like, at
the very least, if you're gonna be honest
about it, it will be accused.
But the way that they just come over
the top and just call them an m
f thirteen terrorist gang member, rapist, human trafficker,
I just don't get why anybody, anywhere, takes
these people seriously.
You can easily prove this stuff is not
the case right now based on Republican judges
too.
But they do their job. They come out
and they yell the narrative.
I mean, I I I just posted something
underneath this the whole DHS account the other
day, saying you're you're just you're embarrassing Americans
today. It's things like this. Whoever's running this
is it's probably some 16 year old doge
worker for all I know. This is it's
just
I mean, look. I don't have much respect
for the government in any case or any
government. But, nonetheless, there's usually you expect some
level of decorum.
Because it's embarrassing because people in the world
look at us and this they they put
this out on Twitter. It says, go home.
That's it. Go home.
I just it just makes me sad again.
Go home.
Everything they are today
completely contradicts what we tell ourselves this country
is.
Everything.
Immigr immigration was supposed to be, like, how
long have we talked about Ellis Island and
the you know, it's just and now suddenly
it's, like, just bad all around. You're not
even American, even if you're born here. If
you're brown, plenty of them are saying that.
Or if you have the wrong ideas. If
you wave a Palestinian flag, you're not really
American.
Like, you guys are the authoritarians. You are
literally ushering in the same thing you always
claim you're fighting, and it's depressing.
Go home.
That's it. That's all he posted.
Aaron Melnick says, at the end of the
day, this below, which I'll read for you,
is exactly why Abrego Garcia's case matters, because
it shows what this admin does when forced
to acknowledge a mistake.
Best way to frame
that. Lawyers for Garcia who have been released
have who has been released have been informed
by ICE that he could now be subject
to deportation to Uganda. And he's been told
by reports that sort
as we just read you for the most
part,
just kinda skip trying to skim it. A
few parts about this because there's a lot
of BS about it. He says, what this
confirms is how deeply corrupt and indefensible Trump
and Stephen Miller's handling of this has been
all throughout.
Those of us commenting on this have argued
all along that Trump, quote, always
or whatever the you know, he's emphasizing always
had the option to bring him back and
proceeding though lawfully through lawful channels. We know
that now.
Oh, the whole dog and pony show they
put on about how it's what are we
gonna bring? We're gonna be a human trafficker?
Bukele
said. To bring him back to the country.
You know? And they were always able to.
And it says, in other words, after illegally
renditioning Abrego Garcia to a Salvadorian gulag, Trump
could at any point have brought him back
and moved to deport him to a third
country or contested his withholding of removal status,
which could have been the legal way to
go about this, and he probably would have
succeeded.
We argue that for months.
Now Trump and Miller left him in El
Salvador for months despite having the option of
removing him to another way. That was illegal.
It defined it it defied the Supreme Court,
and it was all because Trump and Miller
calculated his opinion, but I agreed to some
point
that defying the law they calculated would thrill
MAGA, they frame it, and following the law
would deflate defeat it, deflate it. Now you
I don't know if you wanna frame it
as thrill or just that they would see
it as a win. I got same kinda
point, but I don't want it to sound
like they're just all like, yeah. You know,
some of them are. But the point is
that clearly they recognize that if we do
this, if we extend this out, even though
we're lying, it'll gain us political points. Now
but if we admit it that we were
wrong, then we're gonna lose political points. And
so the law, your rights, none of it
matters. It's all about their personal agenda.
Nothing different from left to right. And it
says, here is how well, JD Vance basically
described the BS of the lie. They've he
laid out the whole when they were in
that White House meeting and they just lied
through their teeth about the whole thing.
Everything JD said was nonsense. They lied about
MS 13 evidence, which we proved to you.
The idea that his fate was up to
Bukele was a lie. We know that now.
And all this valid deportation order idea really
meant is that they could have returned him
at any time and and tempted to removal
via unlawful channels.
Now they're doing the very same thing that
they always could have done rather than leave
him in El Salvador, attempt removal to a
third country. This makes the ongoing prosecution of
him now for trafficking look pretty suspect.
Maybe they don't actually think they can prove
that guilt. They well, this is they know
that now. I'm surprised he doesn't that that
I can prove that based on what the
judge said in front of them in court
that this is,
like,
again, the paraphrasing was something like,
not mathematically, but just, you know, impossible. The
timing that it would take to do what
you said does not add up with what
was possible.
Now it says the full weight of the
Trump White House legal propaganda machine has been
bearing down on this one day laborer and
his family for months, all because Trump and
Miller decided to find the law with thrill
MAGA.
One no one should accept how the US
government has treated this man,
an absolute disgrace.
You know, of course, you could make that
a partisan point and go, whatever he says
bad because that makes me feel like I'm
not on my team. Or you could just
be an honest, moral person with principles and
recognize that whatever side you feel like it's
on, it's wrong.
I start I'm starting to think that this
is where this got more people are starting
to get to because of how cartoonish it
is today. People are just starting to go,
listen, I I I wanna side here. I
feel like I'm on this side, but I
can't align with the outcome right now. And
here are some of these things.
Pauley points out a man arrested for documenting
police and federal agents in Washington DC last
night.
Derek Rose says, man arrested for filming cops
in DC,
watch DC cop watching is a right, and
everyone should be doing it. I will be
doing it when he's he says he'll be
doing it when he's in DC. The simple
point is this is happening all over. Now
they're literally telling you that you can't do
that.
While they don't give warrant, they don't identify
themselves, and they're claiming that it's illegal to
film them because of some addition that Trump
administration put on top of. Some executive order,
some mandate, something that's illegal and unconstitutional.
Same reason you couldn't just go, well, executive
order, you can't have a gun. Executive order,
you you know, we could bust in your
home for no reason. They're doing these things
in some ways, but the point is if
it's unconstitutional, it's null and void. That's Mayberry
versus Madison. It's just the constitution. It's the
reality.
So when they're filming somebody,
they can't make I mean, they could say
once they do get back up and you
can't be this close, which, you know, that
those are just excuses to get into, you
know, whatever that you're in hindering their investigation.
The point is that all over the place,
you can see people that are filming, and
I'll show you some examples right now. And
they don't like it because they're breaking the
law, and most of them know that. And
so if they're filming, I think largely they're
worried that that might come back to them.
But you can just see that he's
filming, and they just ultimately tackle him, arrest
him, and take him away. Just because he
filmed and and and wouldn't stop.
Here
is what they keep doing.
I showed you one just the other day
of a of a woman who was standing
oh, excuse me. That was another one. There
is the US veteran who was filming them
as well. Same thing. And they keep they
take they keep telling him to stop filming
them. Now in the video I showed you,
he was just standing there waiting for them
to come walking out. One of them ran
up behind him and literally,
you know, like,
Superman ed into the ground.
And he hit his head really hard. This
was a US veteran.
Funny how that matters only when they want
it to. Here's another example of ICE literally
sneaking up behind a peaceful protester,
suddenly rushing and blindsiding and tackling him. Now
you can there there's more context down here
that literally shows you they were standing around.
Watch this video.
This is the vindictive nature that they're literally
rolling out. Like, it's it's it's the whole
rampant lawlessness point. If the administration
at the top
is not just doing, but praising
the the the most cowardly, small, unconstitutional
actions,
petty, vindictive kind of stuff, then that's gonna
bleed into the enforcement arm.
I think this is the one.
Dang it. Did I how did I not
get those?
How interesting. Let me make sure I don't
have it real quick, and I'll have to
download it.
Oh, you know what? Maybe oh, you know
what? That's right. I didn't get this one.
That's the one I got next. That's right.
Okay. See, I always do this and I
I'll I'll remember when I get there, then
I forget. So I didn't download this one
just because it there's all the audio was
just yelling and screaming. You can just watch
it right here. Watch this.
I'll read it. His eyes sneaks up and
tackles him. Agents then literally drag him over
the concrete by his arms and legs. Multiple
videos show the man in white hoodie just
standing there with no his hands up. No
one's doing anything, the woman yells. What are
you doing? The violent arrest occurred outside the
Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles, California.
The point now, of course, Dems United is
all it's gonna take for some people to
go fake news and ignore it even though
it's easily proven into fact. That's how the
paradigm works, guys. It's the weak minded are
fooled by this stuff. This is what's happening
all over the country
because they're angry they're being filmed.
Look at that. Just so you see it,
he walks, they're walking up
and they just turn hard to a guy
not facing them and literally bull rush them
on the ground. I don't care what the
reality is here. That's a crime.
Look at that.
Especially since there's people all around that say
they were just it was a part they
were all just protesting.
But, you know, again okay. Let's just say
this guy broke the law somehow.
Is it necessary to run up and literally
hit him from behind and potentially crack his
head on the on the ground? Or is
it just because you wanna make him pay
for doing what you told him not to
do, which is happening everywhere?
Here's an example. ICE attains a husband of
a Democratic congressional candidate who is also a
disabled US veteran army veteran.
He is wheelchair bound
after suffering severe injury during training in deployment
to Iraq.
Agents arrested him at his naturalization
hearing.
He has already got a green card. He's
been living living in this country legally for
twenty five years.
Now I believe he was targeted because he
is part of
Veterans for Peace, which you know exactly what
this is about. The overlap here with the
protest against the genocide, the protesting against any
number of examples of genocidal wars taking place.
I'll play the clip for you, and I'll
make that case.
Concerns a fathering US Army Veteran taken into
ICE custody in Tukwila, Thursday. Zahid Chaudhry is
a permanent resident who went to a naturalization
hearing in Toquilla and ended up detained by
immigration agents. CARE, the Council on American Islamic
Relations, is demanding Chaudhry's release. This photo was
taken just before the hearing. His wife, Melissa,
says Zahid has been trying to get citizenship
since 02/2003.
Melissa says he was originally born in Pakistan,
is a green card holder, and has lived
in The US for twenty five years. He
also served in the US army. He was
injured during active duty and now is wheelchair
bound. His wife is Melissa Chaudhry, who ran
for congress in Washington's Ninth District last year.
She tells us Zaid has been waiting for
this hearing for a while. But
Now with what's going on today,
are you of the mind that these these
people, the Stephen Millers of the world, the
rest of them, with how clearly they are
acting politically or the cop on the street
that goes liberals, liberals ought to destroy it.
When they're at when they're go when they
say you've destroyed this country, and the response
is liberals already did that.
Are you of the mind that people wouldn't
choose to go after this guy on a
list of people with information because he is
associated with anti, you know, protest against Israel
or because associated with a democratic lawmaker or
because, you know, it's low hanging fruit.
It's vindictive. It's political. And the idea is
that he is going he's in the process
of getting his his naturalization.
So what are you arguing? That he's illegal?
He's got a green card.
I just think it's so far over the
top. And and on top of that, fought
for the US military, which I'm not saying
that's something everyone has to respect.
But the argument from the side, especially from
the Republican side, is that something that's sacred.
Now my point has always been, if you
understand what the really the military is actually
doing in the world, it's the military you
should I I don't I don't think it
deserves respect. However, people that go to it
believing they're fighting for freedom,
even if they're wrong, it's still still worthy
of pointing out that's praiseworthy because they believe
they were doing something good. Talk to them
all when they come back, and they'll give
you a different story. But my point is
that to go after this man just because
of, you know, because of everything else we're
seeing,
that he you know, it's an opening.
He's about to become naturalized. Let's get him
before he does because of some claim that
he's protesting Israel or he's doing things that
we don't like or he's pushing back against
the government. That's what it comes down to.
If you're protesting US wars, you hate the
country. Therefore, you're against the country. We'll remove
you.
Just don't believe yeah. It's just sad. It
makes me sad. Like, just especially today. It
really it is just kinda weighing on me
today how depressing it is to see. I
don't think it's the majority, but it's far
too many people who truly do not understand
either don't care or don't understand that they
are the force that's destroying this country. And
then I'm not it's not left or right,
guys. It's anybody who is allowing authoritarian structures
to get and and we saw it during
COVID with the left. We're seeing it right
now with the right.
If you're aware of all of it and
you have principles, start calling this stuff out,
like, everywhere you can. Online, anywhere else.
After several hours, she learned he was detained
and transported. She tells us an ICE agent
refused to tell him why he was being
taken into custody.
Chaudhry says her husband has a misdemeanor charge
out of Australia, but her family never believed
it would be an issue. There you go.
Great. So a US veteran who has been
here for twenty years, who has a green
card,
has a a violation from another country, they're
using whatever they they're using that is not
enough, by the way. The idea that you
can just remove, like, the, oh, it's a
privilege. Well, yes. In many cases, it is.
But once it's given,
then they're protected under law with constitutional rights,
like, by the way, anybody is. The reality,
though, is underneath the point of the actual
not the everybody's got rights point, but under
the laws that exist within that for a
green card and whether or not they can
remove
it, applies to very specific circumstances. I've already
gone over this. You can't just go, oh,
well, you ran a red light, therefore, you're
out of here. That's illegal. And I can
prove that. I've done it many times. This
is over the top, especially since it's clearly
not the most all the violent criminals and
the rapists and the gang members.
That's the vast majority. Like, the vast majority
of what they've gotten have not been that.
I believe they will do their best
to make anybody believe there's a reason.
I think the real reason is something they
don't want to admit,
and that is that his power combined with
his principles, he's a very personally charismatic and
somewhat politically influential man.
They don't want that type of personal power
I agree. And that type of principle
outside their control.
And they especially don't like to see that
in a brown man
from another country who speaks with an accent.
She describes her husband as someone who is
heavily involved with the community, including working with
veteran mental health groups.
His favorite way to greet someone is to
laugh
like the sun
and throw his arms out and greet them
by name and and call them sister or
brother and tell them he loves them and
ask if they're having fun yet.
Zahid is the father of two children under
the age of three. Melissa says she has
not told her kids what has happened yet.
I wish I could lie to them enough
to be like, Bob has gone away for
a while and,
you know, try to hide them from from
the truth of it. But I think they're
gonna wind up getting a pretty clear picture
that Bob was taken from us,
and we don't know when we're gonna see
him again. I don't think I'm gonna be
able to hide that. It's it's too too
visceral, a reality in my soul. I I
can't
I can't keep that from them.
We reached out to ICE to ask WISehood
was taken into custody. We're still waiting to
hear back. Once we learn more, we will
bring you their response
when Which will never come because they don't
care because you're they're not accountable to you
or anybody
else. Right? This is the depressing part of
this, you know? Like, it's just sad.
Do you think I mean, is that who
you think we're going after? You know, they've
they've literally just scooping this guy away. No
one's telling you where. Nothing even matters.
Somebody who has served this country, at least
the military.
You know? It's just incredible. You know? And
the kind of people that cheer this kind
of thing on are the people like Laura
Loomer. The ones who, like, continue to, like,
do somersaults about how they got Gaza and
amputees
turned away from this country.
You know, it's it's just like a a
vile, disgusting kind of person that leaves a
lot of followers.
And the sad thing is that this doesn't
make any sense. He didn't do anything wrong.
But because he's brown and because he supports
things that are against Israel, they'll manufacture justifications.
Democrat people that are pedophiles and rapists and
communist and whatever nonsense they scream, which is
what they do every time,
always hyperbolic, always you know, if you support
Palestine, you're now a Muslim jihadist terrorist. Like,
that's how dumb this gets. And they are
literally, in many ways, influencing the Trump administration.
How embarrassing for conservatives to see a moron
like Laura Loomer literally influencing policy.
Just shows you how broken this place is.
Here is what he's a part of.
So well, I mean, you could see there
was more too.
That was the one that I think stands
out to me as the as the one
that seemed probably matters more. But you can
see army service oh, these were I'm sorry.
These were the awards he's gotten. Army service
service ribbon, global war on terrorism service medal,
armed forces reserve medal, reserve achievement medal, the
national defense service medal, the Recruitment Achievement Medal,
Army Strength Management Award, you know, and then
he doesn't break any crimes, and he's going
through the right channels to become naturalized, and
they go, oh, you've got an old thing
from years ago. You're a criminal monster. Get
out of here.
Meanwhile, they're making deals with human traffickers that
can stay here because they wanna lie about
Garcia, or they're letting MS thirteen members go
because they have a deal with Bukele. Clearly,
we're working with the good guys, guys. You
can clearly tell that. Right? So here is
Veterans for Peace.
Stop genocidal wars. Right? I mean, you can
look through this for yourself and recognize the
obvious, calling out Capitol police arrest and what
they're doing is wrong. This guy was a
problem for them. He was a politically active
person like a Khalil,
who they they can't allow.
Now overlapping that,
just as always,
the beginning with El Salvador taught them a
lesson. We have to do it secretly. That's
all. The lesson isn't don't do the wrong
thing. It's that we have to hide it
better. That's a government mantra.
David Sorta Sorta points out the private jet
lobby created a legal loophole for celebrities, which,
by the way, is an interesting thing to
think about. Right? That they've created this way
where they don't they're allowed to hide their
flights under the some probably some guys that
they'll be followed and tracked in account, which
is, to some degree, probably true. Elon Musk
showed that interesting overlap when people simply just
showed public information about who his what he
was doing. But they've got a loophole. So
if you basically fly private, you have to
you can do whatever you want, which usually
means they can traffic drugs and they can
take people wherever they want. Same thing with
diplomats. You know, they live in a different
world. They live in the elitist class where
they can do what they want. But now
ICE is doing the same thing. ICE is
using the same loophole with private jets to
deport immigrants to people we don't get to
follow.
How much you wanna bet this is happening
so much more than we even know? Secret
flights going whoever, what, wherever else, and now
we don't even hear about it because no
one's reporting it.
Doesn't that terrify you with how much they've
lied about their I mean, to be that
you can just be disappeared by supposedly this
democracy saving the world from monsters.
It shows you you're not in the place
you think you are.
Oh, and there's another report of this American,
citizen who was arrested by the US government.
Oh, wait. I'm sorry. That I made a
mistake. This was a US citizen that was
arrested by Israel who's currently in prison that
they never released. So you're supposed to ignore
it.
That's the truth.
Now we're gonna come back to this later.
I will talk about this in the overlap
with the
Israeli government member that's under Netanyahu
that you all know about the story. I'm
not even I'm only gonna touch on it
at the end because it's been very widely
covered, who is removed,
allowed to be removed from the country even
though he was part of a child sexting.
They caught him.
They took everyone else. They let him take
his passport and let him leave, including the
two Zionists within our government that allowed that
to happen.
The point is the tale of two stories
here.
This American citizen
went to visit his family and is currently
in a prison in Israel. Have you heard
about that from your American citizen
government? Have you heard about that from the
pro freedom, pro democracy, pro America? No. America
first. Where are they right now? This is
an American citizen who's being is in prison,
who's lost 20 pounds, who's got scabies because
he's in the wrong place, because he's the
wrong skin color.
That's what happens in Israel for an American,
and your government doesn't care. Meanwhile, an Israeli
child predator comes to this country,
gets
caught, they let him go.
He's currently safe in Israel. He was just
doing rounds on the media, talking about or
how he was before, and I'm now doing
more. Before, he was talking about the idea
of how he's involved with the one taking
down most of the things online,
on Twitter.
It's just it's all right in front of
you if you care to look. This is
just to make the point
that we're supposed to not care when an
Israeli or a foreign country abducts an American
citizen as long as it's Israel.
Now let's talk about the, you know, the
DC point, the martial law rollout, but my
point is always in this show is the
overlap of that with the technocratic side of
things. And I think this is a really
important take on
not just, Panomol's capital, which is the t
o universe kind of funding of the smart
city, Prospera,
slave technocratic world overlap.
But the point is that this is
it's not just about the one thing.
But most the real thing is to see
the interconnected point between Prospera and these other
really horrifying realities and this the medical experimentation
they're doing there.
And then the same people funding that are
the ones funding a totally different thing over
here called Freedom Cities.
It's the same thing.
And what they're now doing with DC and
the kind of rumors about Thiel, it makes
you really start to wonder what's going on.
Or if they're all one and the same.
From and for almost capital and the rapid
transition to a techno feudal state.
Make sure you watch this. I feel this
is an important show.
But building from that, for those that watched
it, let's talk about the 50 in five
point that I think is really interesting.
Tamas points this out. The global digital gulag
is being built right now,
and it's called 55. Now you could make
that same statement for any number of, you
know, it's called twenty thirty. It's called the
great reset. But its point is it's one
of these many things that are rolling out
that all point in the same direction. And
what I'm gonna try to show you is
how this interconnects with all the people that
are currently tied well, not all, but many
of the important people that are usually bad
guys but are currently tied to Trump,
like Bill Gates, like Larry Fink,
and how all the things they're listing are
currently being done by Trump.
But, again, if you think I'm talking about
one side or not, it's the it's the
same government. It's Biden. It's Trump. It's Obama.
But currently, they're in power. And currently, I
think it's happening because the largest pushback would
have come from people that Trump's the the
people that support him.
So, like, when he rolled out operation warp
speed, you you carefully,
you know, stifled
who would have been the most resistant because,
well, Trump's doing it. That's how this works.
The United Nations Development Program, in partnership with
Bill Gates, has officially launched a terrifying new
initiative. It says the goal to strong-arm 50
governments into implementing a full digital public infrastructure
on their populations within five years. Don't let
the boring name fool you. This is the
integrated control grid that they've been dreaming about
for decades. Digital IDs, biometrics,
central bank digital currencies, you know, or stablecoin
versions, which are far far worse. Digital health
passports.
Universal
ledger. Here's a clip. You know my opinions
on, you know, I'm not a big fan
of of,
hold on.
It's Glenn Beck. I just forgot it all
of a sudden, but I'm not, you know,
I
I honestly have a different opinion of him
than I do of some of the others,
but I I I don't I all of
them make me very suspicious for very obvious
reasons, at the very least because they're very
partisan. That doesn't mean dishonest necessarily unless you
wanna make the clear point that it is
dishonest to not talk about something when it
matter, you know, when it's uncomfortable for your
party. Like, but that's, like, at a base
level, they all do that. Most partisans do
that, where they, you know, slightly distort a
story because they wanna make it look good
for their party or they ignore something because
we all know that. But I think it
goes beyond that. But I think just that
enough
is is enough for me to to look
at these people like they shouldn't, you know,
earn your trust very clearly. Any of them,
any of us. And if you shouldn't trust
anybody in this field, including myself, you should
question it for yourself.
But my point is that I think we
all know they're at a level that is,
you know, suspicious. Well, you know, you get
the point. So that
is important to state
only because I just want you to, you
know, that this is the reality of the
corporate media side of this and how this
is being folded into it, I think, is
an important thing to think about.
Could be that they're suddenly waking up, like
your Tucker suddenly sees it. I find it
hard to believe.
Or it could be that they're just trying
to, you know, use the obvious to gain
your your support your support, which happens all
the time. I mean, a good point is
to look at Marjorie Taylor Greene with Israel.
Now maybe she sees it. I hope so.
But look at how that has worked out
for her. That's the point I'm trying to
sell everybody on. Make it clear to them
that the truth is their most profitable tool.
Make it clear to them that opportunism
will be supported as long as you're using
it for the truth. Right? And I only
mean that in the instantaneous point. Not that
you just support whatever they say going forward,
but if they come up today and go,
this is the case and it's right, even
if you know they're only doing it because
they wanna gain your support,
you should raise it up and go true.
So I think that's a lot of what's
happening. I'll come back to that in a
minute. But this clip is important.
And this, oh, you know what? I'm blank.
I forgot. Oh, dang it.
I remember I I forgot I was gonna
grab his name, and I forgot his name
all of a sudden. The guy he's talking
to. I'll try to find it in the
background. If you remember his name, put it
in the chat for me. I I had
it, and I wanted to bring up his
account so we could credit him for his
statements. But let's watch this clip, and then
we'll go over the points I think connects
to the larger agenda and this current administration.
We about the 55
plan.
So the UN has partnered with Bill Gates,
on this, what they call, digital public infrastructure.
It's a very fancy term. And I think
the simplest way to understand it is they're
building a giant digital gulag for all of
humanity. So the UN Development Program,
has officially launched this. It was officially launched
at the end of last year where they're
gonna get 50 government they call them countries,
but really they mean governments,
to impose at least some major element of
this digital public infrastructure on their population within
five years. So twenty twenty eight passports. Digital
IDs, and those are already emerging. In fact,
many states are are developing these. I just
went through the airport yesterday. You can scan
your digital ID, QR code. Right? So that's
happening. And that's that's really one of the
main reasons
for the COVID
Absolutely. Nonsense. The architecture. Oh my god, Glenn.
You're so brave. You finally got there. Good
job.
Just think about that. You know, it's super
brave to come out and say the thing
that literally everybody in the world has acknowledged
by now. But remember, in the time, they
were
pulling their punches.
Maybe he was just wrong
or maybe not. Sure. That was laid down
is the backbone of this global control grid
that they're building. So you've got the central
bank digital currencies, which are already being unveiled.
Right? They they've already been, released. The World
Economic Forum just said a few days ago,
98%
of the governments, the central banks in the
world are working on these CBDCs.
Once they're fully operational, I guarantee you, they're
gonna start waging war on cash much more
openly. They'll say it's a tool for terrorists,
pimps, and and, you know, every nasty thing
you tax cheats, everything you can think of.
Then you've got the the payment processing systems,
and you've also got that we we just
had the head of the World Health Organization
talk about this recently, the digital health certificates,
the digital vaccine passports.
They're taking what the EU developed during the
COVID, which, by the way, the the European
Commission was promoting vaccine passports
in May
2019,
long before anybody ever heard of, COVID or
anything like that. So they're taking all of
this together,
and they are using it to build a
control system that will not just be able
to surveil
and monitor everything you do on an unprecedented
scale when you combine it with AI, the
ability to make sense of all this data.
It's just mind blowing, But also to manipulate
what you do. And so they're talking about
this, again, pretty openly. If you look at
the World Economic Forum meetings, they talk about
the benefits of programmable
central bank digital currency, where they will be
able to say who can buy what, when,
under what conditions. And then the bank for
international settlements, you know, Carol Quigley, to go
back to him for a moment,
Bill Clinton's mentor, the guy who really exposed
this global agenda to create a one world
system, he said the apex of the system
was gonna be the bank for international settlements.
This is an institution that's almost entirely unknown
to Americans.
And what they are working on right now,
and this is not a secret, it's not
a conspiracy because it's not happening behind closed
doors, is what they call a universal
blockchain
ledger. They wanna tokenize
every asset in the known universe, every farm,
every car, every house, every tree, put it
on this ledger, this blockchain ledger, and then
you're only able to interact with this blockchain
ledger using your biometric digital ID,
using your central bank digital currencies. And so
if I wanna buy something from you, I
can't just hand you a $100 bill. I've
gotta go on my device,
connect to this blockchain system, transfer the central
bank digital currencies to you. And so this
is a a mechanism for controlling humanity that
I think is really unprecedented in human history.
And when you take it all together, it's
very obvious.
Right.
Katie got the point already.
As she said in the chat, such edgy
reporting. Am I right? Well, quite literally every
single piece of information you heard there has
been talked about by Whitney Webb, Derrick Rose,
myself, most in the IMA
for a long time.
David Icke, way before that. Joseph Corbett, way
before that. So I just you know, that's
doesn't mean it's unimportant to point out now.
But interesting to see the way these things
evolve and then the way it's sort of
framing, you know, like, who apparently you know,
it's just there's very the way these things
are cultivated
is to get you to think, like, cap
off where your information goes. Right? So you
don't really see the full picture. You kinda
build it from here forward, and you get
people thinking that we're breaking it down right
now. We're in the we're at the front
lines of breaking and all you're really doing
in some many ways, in many cases, we've
seen in the past, is
you like, now that that information, like, at
this point, it's they've already used what they
want from it. Right? Now it's okay that
you see the COVID thing was a lie
because they've moved into the next thing. Now
they're gonna use your awareness of that to
drive you into the next thing.
It's it's not hard to see, and this
is a very clear tactic. So
whether that's the case or not, you can
decide. I don't wanna always say that somebody's
saying the thing late is a deceptor, I
don't or a deceiver. I don't think that's
always the case, But it's worth considering every
time. But overall, it's important. Right? Not just
I mean, everything they listed there
is old information, like, very much so. But
the new 55
is something that is important to hear. So
I'm glad you guys picked up on that,
but this is where it goes.
Here is the actual plan. This is 55
implementing
digital public infrastructure safely and inclusively.
Now, again, every part of what this is,
you guys, you guys could probably type out
in the chat before I even look what
every one of these things are. Because you've
been watching the show, because you've been looking
for yourselves, because it's really obvious to see
if you're paying attention. But overall, you can
look through it and understand the interconnectivity
of it all, interoperability, where you are either
a part of it or you're not. And
we know what dictates whether you're a part
of it. Whether you say the right things,
you have the right political opinions, whether you
buy the right stuff, whether you endorse the
right political parties, like this is what is
being built.
And, of course, point is, you know, the
Gates Foundation,
as well as others that we could add,
UN, of course.
The point, though, is to make this
continuing point.
That if we know that this is happening
people that are aggressively, you know, adamant about
it are currently involved in the Trump administration,
then does that should have been, like, at
least raise some concern. Right?
So at least, you know, conservative or otherwise,
you should go, okay. Well, maybe that's a
problem.
Instead of going, well, I know Trump's the
right guy, so I don't care. Unless it's,
you know, the same situation for a Democrat,
then it's the biggest deal in the world.
Don't be one of those people. Be honest
with yourself. So let's talk about the many
different points of this. First, the Bill Gates
point, and then I'm gonna go with the
different examples of every checklist we just showed
you. The digital ID in one way or
another is being rolled out right now in
this administration, but also just before that in
this country and pretty much every country in
the world right now. But as seven seas
points out, Bill Gates is excited to work
with Trump. Zuckerberg excited to work with Trump.
General point, all of them. Netanyahu. Trump will
speak at Davos WEF meeting, which he did.
Trump is working with Larry Fink on economic
policy. He is. Trump is appointing George Soros
banker to run the Treasury. He is.
But I wanted you to hear this clip.
Here's Bill Gates,
and you already saw this. This is him
just telling you how excited he was because
of his meeting with Trump. Now remember, that
was about the vaccine direction. And what has
happened? Well, they're sprinting in the direction of
what he likes. The self amplifying or trans
amplifying shots.
You can look to him look at his
own information to find that out for yourself,
and he's excited about where it's going. If
you think they stopped mRNA, you're not paying
attention. You're not watching the show. You're not
engaging with the source material. You're listening to
Republicans scream. The truth is you can easily
prove that they are very clearly continuing
even just regular mRNA COVID shots when it's
from Arc Turbos and Amplitude
Therapeutics.
Those are continuing. It's it's on the document
everyone's pointing to. And as well as that,
they're leaning into self amplifying shots in all
of those directions. On top of that, mRNA
in every other field is still continuing.
And there's been there's been new mRNA shots
for for rabies, for dogs. Just I just
it's just over the top. But this is
why Gates was excited in my opinion. Chance
to go have
a a long and actually
quite intriguing dinner with him. What did you
discuss? What was intriguing? Yeah. And then he
arrested him. Deep state going down.
Right?
Or not. Or he said, oh, he's a
good guy, and he cares. And you know,
Clintons are good people.
40 chess. Wink. Wink. It's gonna be seventeen
years later. We're gonna get him. Just it's
just sad what people do. If this guy
was gonna go to jail for the crimes
that he very much did commit, which left
or right, you could be able to acknowledge
that,
very much this guy is like one of
these fake philanthropists that are out there doing
horrible things,
then he would have been arrested.
Right?
Or you can tell yourself they're building some
case or it's four d chess. The truth
is, guys, they're working together, and we need
to be honest about that. Same with Larry
Fink, which we're gonna get to. Well, we
touched on a lot of things. It was
over three hours to my surprise. It was,
you know, just he and I, his chief
of staff, Susie Wiles, and the person who
helps
manage things for me, Larry
Cohen. So the Of course, Susie Wiles. Right?
You know, the Israel connected Zionist who was
always seemingly gatekeeping around Trump.
No big deal. Four of us sat there
and,
was quite wide ranging.
You know, global health's the area that I
work in, and
such amazing things have happened and can happen
there. That you work in. It's very, very,
very dishonest of you. You're a guy with
money
that pretends to be an expert because you
have money. You don't work in anything other
than you know? It's just funny. It's like
claiming that somebody who has a lot of
money is an expert in something. You know?
He he fancies himself as some kind of
public health expert. He's really not. He's also
not an expert when it comes to computers,
but that's a different story.
I spoke a lot about HIV
and that the foundation's literally working on a
a cure for that. We're at an early
stage, and so, you know, he
in the COVID days,
accelerated the vaccine innovation. So I, you know,
was asking him
if maybe the same kind of thing could
be done here, and we both got, I
think, pretty excited about that. We talked about
polio,
where, you know, we're very close to getting
that done, but
if you if you stop,
it'll spread back.
And so I explained
why it's been tough in Pakistan, Afghanistan.
We've had cases show up in Gaza. We
have cases in Africa, and he was fascinated
to hear
what he could do to
maximize the chance that during the next four
years that incredible milestone will be achieved.
I felt like he was,
you know, energized and,
you know, looking forward to helping to drive
innovation.
You know, I I was I was frankly
impressed with how well he
showed a lot of interest in
the the issues I I brought up.
Yeah. There you go. Right?
Bill Gates happy with what he's doing. Clinton
Clinton's praising his direction. It's almost like they're
on the same team.
But remember, in the vaccine point of it
all, every one of those places he listed
off, they didn't have brow outbreaks because they
didn't do them. They got brow outbreaks because
it almost directly followed the use of an
oral polio vaccine. I mean, that's even even
a Associated Press reported that.
So he's just like, you have to understand
that's Bill Gates willfully deceiving you about what
actually happened because that's part of his agenda.
Now you can always pretend it's because, well,
they made a mistake and by admitting it,
it's only gonna hurt the direction that he
believes is good for the world. I don't
believe that.
But even if you believe that, that still
means they're being dishonest.
So the point is that Bill Gates is
clearly
in line with Trump's direction, and that has
been flushed out by what they're still doing.
It's not hard to see. You think Stargate
is something that Bill Gates is unhappy about?
So beyond that,
Larry Fink, who's interviewing Bill Gates right here,
or or the other way around, either way
you look at it. The point is that
these two are also working together, both of
which are very close to Trump's current inner
circle.
That should matter based on everything we've been
told by Republicans up until now. And, again,
I'm making a point by saying that I
do believe that Gates and BlackRock in general
are problems
for many reasons I've covered many times. In
fact, I'll I'll include an article Josh Markos
wrote for TLAB about BlackRock that's a good
good breakdown.
But let's watch this. Camus again. Bill Gates
is back, not with a solution for the
planet, but with a blueprint for control.
He assembled a cartel of the world's most
powerful corporations,
BlackRock, Microsoft that's, like, embarrassingly overlap like, infiltrated
by Israel. We'll show you that in a
minute again. GM, Bank of America,
under the green banner of his Catalyst Fund.
His smooth promises of bringing cost down and
helping all countries participate are a smokescreen.
Here's what he's really saying. He's creating a
public private monopoly.
They will use their influence to funnel billions
in government tax credits and and recovery funds,
your money, into their own chosen projects. They
will guide the effort designing a market that
mandates the use of the expert expensive green
products,
like sin fuels and hydrogen, eliminating the true
competition in consumer choice.
Now some of that is the way that
Cayman sees it, and I do I actually
do agree, but I to be clear, part
of that is the way he sees it
going. There's other ways this could go. Either
way, it comes down to the manipulation of
it for their benefit, would be the easiest
way to put it. And it says this
isn't philanthropy.
Now what's the word that there was a
word for that.
I don't know if it was Corbett that
made it up, but there's a word that
it's like like for fake philanthropy or like
I don't know. If you remember that word,
get it in the chat. It's a good
it's a good word. It it's like, you
know, where they they're using philanthropy, but it's
really not about philanthropy or they're using the
idea of it to do something else. But
it says it's not philanthropy, it's the great
reset in action. I agree. And it's exactly
what's rolling out right now through the US
government, just like it was under Biden and
before. It's about using the climate agenda to
consolidate
unprecedented
power and the global energy supply. Now, yes,
in one case, it's about the climate agenda,
but it's we're clearly seeing the same things
justified from the other side of the paradigm.
I'd like to believe he sees that. But
it says,
and ensuring ensuring
you pay for a system they own and
control.
Right? Does that sound very similar to, like,
a CEO authoritarian run city
run by a dictatorial
CEO technocrat like a Thiel or a Marc
Andreessen. Yeah. That's exactly the over it's it's
the different flavor, but the same outcome.
This is the ultimate corporate takeover dressed up
as salvation.
Yeah. I agree.
It's very exciting,
that we've got seven founding partners here for
Catalyst.
These are companies that care about climate.
And even beyond,
getting rid of their own emissions
are helping to support the projects
that will reduce
the costs
of making things like,
aviation fuel or hydrogen.
And so it's not just their emissions that
will be impacted here as we take this
over billion dollars in capital we already have,
and that's just the start,
and fund these projects. We're gonna bring the
cost down
so that, you know, all companies and all
countries,
will be able to participate
in using green products.
So I saw this as a key element.
I first, went to Sabrina Della,
then, you know, seeing how out in front,
Larry's been on this issue. I went to
him, and so the two of them,
encouraged me to get a group together. And
now,
we've got five other companies who are leaders
in this space,
announcing substantial commitments.
You know, as we start with over a
billion dollars to help fund
the scale of projects
that will bring the cost down. And there's
a lot of leverage here because there'll be
government money, government tax credits,
that will pull together,
dozens of these projects.
And you've got, if I understand it, in
addition to Microsoft
and BlackRock, you've got Bank of America, you've
got General Motors, you've got BCG,
ArcelorMittal.
I may be missing one. American Airlines.
That's okay. I'm with Gates' smile, by the
way. Oh, so and, clearly, I forgot. So
it's this guy's interview, both of them. But
it's just funny that look at the way
Gates
look at that. You know, people have always
pointed out.
It's just a kind you know, like, maybe
he's just smiling and we see what he
is and that's what it looks, but he's
got this this is like evil
cat that got the canary kind of a
laugh and smile. And it's just weird. Watch
him. Missing one. American
Airlines.
Those are the the seven founding partners
who are gonna help guide this effort.
We do expect to bring in lots more
companies. We have announced that Catalyst also is
working with governments. The EU
and The United States announced that they see
this effort as very complimentary. And so designing
these projects well, which if government was doing
it by itself, you wouldn't have the breadth
of expertise you need. So,
our
Right. That's see, that's the rationale for the
the fascistic overlap. Right? The public private partnership,
what we need their expertise, which I don't
disagree. The government's bad at everything. But it's
interesting that they they you know, when they
do it together, it's like a perfect scenario
where they can not tell you what they
won't wanna tell you under the guys the
other side won't allow. You know? So when
it's a FOIA request, sorry. Private government private
company. Right? The other way around, it's like,
nope. It's the government. It's not us. You
know? It's like this it's it's very obvious
how this plays out. And on top of
that, it allows
all the things that come along with the
with the incestuous relationship between big corporations and
the government.
Expertise,
the company's expertise with the governments,
you know, are taking a lot of recovery
money.
Europe you know, has committed a lot of
capital. The congress is debating,
substantial money in the two different bills there,
that if those go through, will allow this
effort to go,
full speed.
Yep.
That's what's happening.
Now here are the connections
of Donald Trump,
Larry BlackRock
and Larry Fink, and then administration of Trump
and himself personally.
Panama Canal, you already know. We talked about
that. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, personally contacted
Donald Trump to pitch the deal
for BlackRock to acquire two key ports on
either that happened.
But he got presented with and so this
you know, of course, he frames that as
something he's accomplishing, but, ultimately, that's Larry Fink
pulling the strings to the Trump.
Fink's direct involvement with briefings and briefings with
Trump, treasury secretary Scott Bissent, Zionist, and secretary
of Mark Rubio, Zionist, were crucial to finalizing
that deal. Did not mention BlackRock by name,
of course, when it happened. He called it
a large American company, which we caught and
called
out. I mean, that's very clear why you
wouldn't wanna mention that even though most of
his team sport players pull the punch anyway.
Longstanding personal professional relationship. Yes. That's Larry Fink.
Fink and Trump have known each other for
forty years, dating back to their time as
young entrepreneurs in Midtown Manhattan's financial subculture.
Donald Trump during Trump's first presidency,
Fink served as a member of Trump's strategic
policy forum. But we pretend like that doesn't
matter when even, like, a handshake from Larry
Fink somehow makes every Democrat a pedophile or
whatever you wanna claim even though, you know,
again, understanding of the overlap of anybody in
this government with worry the, you know, the
Epstein thing, for example.
All of it, not one side, is important.
No. Not that everyone on one side or
the other is some satanic pedophile, but the
reality
is clearly
that if it matters,
if Larry thinks a bad guy, if BlackRock's
a problem,
it needs to matter when anybody's associated with
it. You know, when XAI and Twitter get
funded by BlackRock, that should matter. When Rumble
and their lead their highest shareholders are BlackRock
and Vanguard, that shouldn't matter.
But it gets ignored.
Trump also acknowledged Fink's role in managing some
of his personal investments during this period,
stating in 02/2017,
quote, Larry did a great job for me.
He managed a lot of my money. I
have to tell you, he's got me great
returns.
Great.
So if what we if what the Republicans
say about BlackRock is true, then Trump is
benefiting and profiting from those bad and evil
things.
Funny how that doesn't get brought up. During
the coronavirus outbreak, Trump consulted Fink for advice
on managing the economic fallout,
right, which they then handed off control of
the treasury to BlackRock, which we did a
whole show on this. Coup the COVID coup,
the BlackRock takeover of American interests.
But that was okay.
BlackRock played a significant role in this period,
positioning itself as a key
player in the crisis response for Trump administration
and the Federal Reserve. Trump publicly described Fink
as a secret weapon for economic advice during
the press conference.
Today, rather now in twenty twenty five, March
seventeenth, Fink met with Trump at the White
House on March 17 along with Elon Musk
and vice president JD Vance
and Michael Waltz. You know, the one that
they've now pushed aside because he got caught
using a Israeli intelligence app on his phone
during secret meetings,
like, I think most of them do. It's
It's called TeleMessage. It was a signal overlap
app that was relaying information back to Israel.
In fact
of course.
Let's do.
That's frustrating.
Is that the one?
That's an important show to watch.
Nope. Here's an old one, by the way.
Just
Trump signs executive order saying Judaism is now
a nationality.
No. It's not. New toothless NDA allows Yemen
and Iran wars. How funny. Here. Oh, now
that I got it open, let's do this.
It should pop
up.
Or was it signal?
Or it was app.
There it is. So I had I had
the terms wrong.
State department revealed to be using Israeli intelligence
link chat app involved in Trump admin hack.
As I said before,
the whole the whole scandal was that he
got caught using signal, but it wasn't signal.
See, this is how the gate the mainstream
and nature alternative media make they pull their
punch while they pretend they're going after them.
It's a it's a game. It was about
the teleMessage app that was actually a a
a, what's the word for it?
It archives all the information, and it was
it's literally connected to Israeli intelligence.
And they got pushed aside, but they were
all using it.
So many examples of the infiltration. It's insane.
But with Mike Waltz, Larry Fink met with
Musk and Trump and Vance and Waltz, and
a closed door came discussion which lasted over
an hour. This is in March 17, covered
The US economy,
financial markets, the Panama Canal deal. This meeting
solidified Fink's position within Trump's inner circle,
so according to the Rock anyway, despite years
of tension with the Republican Party over BlackRock's
ESG
initiatives.
Right? So he basically just kinda was like,
well, now we're going the Republican way. What
does that show you? That they really just
care about the outcome, not the narrative that
gets them there. So now I'm on your
side, so now we'll make it about immigration.
Can we keep going forward? Alright.
Made a strategic pivot to align with Republican
priorities.
Yeah. Because it doesn't matter. It's it's about
the use of it. It's about control.
BlackRock's massive financial influence, managing over 11,600,000,000,000.0
in assets,
made it a natural partner for Trump's administration.
The point is that trillion dollar $11,000,000,000,000,
guys, they're controlling the world. I mean, I
I don't mean that in some, like I
mean, it's kinda I mean, it's sort of
hyperbolic. I'm not saying that in, like, every
possible sense, but that think about how much
money that is. The amount of control over
that information, over companies, I mean, that's why
it is what it is. BlackRock is literally
invested in damn near everything.
Damn near, not everything, but, you know, it's
crazy to look at the portfolio. It's
in one way or another, connected to almost
everything.
Some posts on Twitter suggest a deeper connection,
speculating that Fink and BlackRock may have influenced
Trump's policies. It's not it's not even hype
it's not even up for debate. Yes. That's
what happened. Such as an executive order allowing
private equity and crypto firms access to pension
funds.
Reportedly lobbied by BlackRock and Apollo Global Management.
Reports indicate Trump invited Fink to Mar A
Lago in March 2025 to discuss further investment
opportunities,
suggesting an ongoing relationship. Additionally, during the March
17 White House meeting, Fink and Elon Musk
discussed a potential deal between BlackRock
and the new AI fund and Musk's xAI,
which is exactly what happened. Indicating possible future
collaboration,
See, this is Grok playing the, we don't
have access to the obvious information that everybody
knows about, which is that, yes, it didn't
maybe come to pass. It already happened. Or
BlackRock very much did fund XAI. And now
XAI, by the way,
in case you missed this overlap,
became Twitter, or it already was, is the
real point.
I said I'm gone.
When they merged. And the reality is it
was always there. Right?
DARPA xAI program is what Elon is continuing.
And he bought Twitter, started xAI
right after that program supposedly ended,
then he sold it to x. So now
your your AI program is your social media
platform, which, by the way, is being funded
by BlackRock and is using Israeli intelligence to
take your biometrics. All very clear on the
record.
Include all that.
As well as that, I'll grab that one
too.
Because it's still happening. I check this all
the time. They're still using Authentics. It is
an Israeli intelligence entity.
Not hyped, not connected, it is. It's just
it's wild to me. And the biometrics, of
course, it ties back to the bigger point.
But the connections of Fink and and Gates
are all very clear. Here's a post from
November 2024.
BlackRock's Larry Fink and at least one senior
BlackRock executive has been contracted by Trump's team
as they search for a treasury secretary. So
this is before he got in power. And
what did they get him to do? Get
the Zionist. Get the Zionist. Get the get
the senate.
And this is reported by Fox News. Trump
has had a long relationship with Fink, it
says, who is one of of the best
risk managers in the business and has often
leaned on him for his views and his
marketing, but he's totally not influencing policy. Fink
will not be a candidate for a treasury,
but it tells you something about Donald Trump
that he is the big tent of the
idea and how to run, you know, basically
using the guy.
It's obvious they didn't use him because they
knew that would be a step too far.
This is insights.
My, was it mytrade.com?
BlackRock's Larry Fink abruptly becomes part of Trump's
inner circle. How'd we get there? That was
August 2025.
You'd think that would matter, wouldn't it? Let's
also not forget that Larry Fink is now
the chairman of the World Economic Forum. Because
you think that would matter too, but I
guess not because we're we know it only
matters when one side I've never made that
point many times. I just think it's so
wild how clear it is.
Now here's DC Drano.
Oh, look.
This is on August 22.
Two of the three largest stockholders
in Crackle Barrel or BlackRock and Vanguard.
Funny how he cares about that all of
a sudden, seeing as how so is rumble,
which he adamantly supports.
In fact, we let's just make sure since
I haven't looked at it in a minute.
Oh, come on.
Let's see if that works. That's what used
to make it pop up.
Here we go. I think this is the
one.
Is that the right page?
Which one was it?
I'll see.
I'll see if that pops up.
I swear it was on this page last
time. If that if that's been removed, that
would be hilarious to me. Not oh, there
it is. Not removed in the sense, like,
they like, you know, they didn't show it.
But now look. So now Cantor Fitzgerald has
suddenly bumped to the top, which I don't
mean isn't even necessarily, like, could just happen
on its own. But before that, it was
Vanguard and BlackRock.
Rumble link.
Is that funny that that so the exact
same point, and yet he's never called out
rumble. Why is that?
On top of the fact that we just
told you that rumble or rather BlackRock is
literally involved with policy for Trump or more
accurately with what we have in front of
us, that he's advising Trump. He's involved with
Trump's administration. He's on the inner circle, and
so is Bill Gates.
But it's funny that he only cares about
it. Why? Because Cracker Barrel. Because that's the
current thing. Just like I said before, you
just like the left you make fun of,
you currently support the current thing because that's
what they all do. And as Brad Miller
says, it's rare that DC is says something
accurate, but he is right. And I don't
disagree. I just don't think that it's really
about Cracker Barrel. I think that's the easy
way to get you to scream about something
that nobody cares about when it come in
power, I mean. You think they really care
about what they do with the logos, guys?
It's so sad that we think these people
and I don't mean the average people. I'm
not even talking about congress. There's probably plenty
of left leaning congress that think this is
so great because they're all stupid.
But if you think the people who are
truly in charge care about you using woke
pronouns, I mean, think about that for a
second and and ask why that even makes
sense.
The problem is that they will scream about
whatever they're supposed to because mister phase one
Epstein files is not honest.
I've been calling out the Rumble thing forever.
And again, I'm not even suggesting that means
anything other than that they're involved invested that
that Rumble can't control. It's just to point
out the hypocrisy of the side. But now
to show you all the different things that
we the 55 are being checked off right
down this country. We already did a show
on this one, Trump's backdoor vaccine passport,
which was actually a really important thing that
was pointed out,
by Toby Rogers.
And I'm it's funny. I didn't even think
about it this way, but we covered the
digital health e tech ecosystem.
This was on June 3 July 30 to
bring health care into the digital age.
Partners like OpenAI, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, you
know, all the good guys.
The point is it was a backdoor vaccine
passport system. It's exactly
I couldn't believe I didn't think of it
first.
Good on good. Follow Toby Rogers. He does
good work. The point is that that is
very obvious, and it's a part of the
problem that they claim they're fighting. But he
called it something else, stablecoin, so it's okay.
Not CBDC. No. It's actually far worse. It's
they're doing this everywhere.
Or
the private health tracking system,
right, for the surveillance part of it, which
is already being rolled out. That they are
that they all stood up and praised like
some amazing thing with all the same points.
Or
this is just these are all individual examples
on top of everything else we've already shown
you. Like the Save Act, for example, or
the many other pushes for digital ID from
left and right, including this current administration. Here's
one more of them. Surprise, surprise, Eric writes,
the Trump administration has found another backdoor to
digital IDs.
The treasury is seeking comments on its implementation
of digital identities for DeFi.
It's just it's just a, you know, death
by a thousand cuts. It's really it's all
it's boiling frog. There's many different analogies for
it. It's happening. Just gotta be honest about
it.
The
massive compilation of all the personal data for
surveillance or this overlaps with the blockchain ledger
point. It's all about having information.
Palindir to create vast federal database, data platform,
tying together millions of Americans, private records, stock
jumps.
Or the New York Times article, Trump taps
Palindir to compile data on Americans, and they've
really downplayed the severity of it.
White house, of course, scraps plans to block
those brokers from selling your data, you know,
because totally not connected as they scoop up
all your data and then remove the blocks
from them being able to profit from that.
No big deal.
So obvious. Or, of course, the idea that
all of it is overlap with Israel when
their memorandum of understanding, so Israel has access
to all of that data on you.
Or the general push into self amplifying shots.
Like, all of it. Digital IDs, digital currency,
surveillance,
ledger, all of it. I mean, the blockchain
ledger point, which I didn't actually say anything
about it back in the video we were
watching. Whitney has talked about that for a
long time, and we've personally talked about the
gamification.
Right? Using that blockchain point to, you know,
literally track everything, the trees. You know what
a part of that is? Nanotechnology.
That this is all interconnected. But watch this
show if you wanna understand that Trump admin
leans into self amplifying mRNA
under a guise of stopping it.
And, of course, this,
you know, this is what really gets me.
This is James g O'Donnell. I've referenced it
many times. Yes. He's part of the government,
so, you know, be skeptical. Like, it will
I shouldn't even need to say that anymore.
You should know that's inherent, but I'll always
do that. No matter whether it's someone you
should trust or not, question everybody.
But he's a he's a DARPA adviser.
Now the actually, battlescape brain, I I went
through this document before, but it's just a
clip of what he's
discussing, showing you. And I think people have,
Nate, like, put overviews of imagery and so
on.
It's about the bigger picture, and this is
what at least he's claiming is what has
already been done. And that's what worries me.
DARPA advisor admits publicly that Neuralink,
that what, you know, the the claim of
what they're doing is actually old tech. How
long have we talked about that? And that
DARPA has officially achieved nonsurgical brain control. You
know what that in at least one case
that is? That's Charles Lieber. That's Robert Langer.
That's the optogenetics, the magnetogenetics. That's just that's
what at least in one part, and they're
probably way beyond that now in what we're
talking about.
Charles Lieber was doing that in 2011 with
what these virus sized transistors. It's very clear
that at least they're claiming, I'm willing to
consider that they're making it up, of course,
with question everything, but that they're claiming this
has been going on a long time. James
D'Odano told you during COVID nineteen, they were
already testing this stuff.
So
recognize where all this goes, and this is
interconnected. You cannot have that world they're talking
about without this kind of tech advancement.
And if you don't understand what that means,
go back and watch other shows because it's
a big topic to get into. But, like
like, digital IDs are the connective tissue between
the new and the old. They need the
digital ID to be able to enforce on
everything else. This stuff is necessary for the
world they wanna build with the Internet of
bio nano things, the bio convergence that if
you care to look, they're all screaming about.
This is why it becomes so important to
understand
the novelty and the viability
of neuroscience as being leveraged as weapons. We
then have the use of nano particulate agents,
aerosolizable
nanomaterials that can be breathed in and disrupt
blood flow or neurological network activity that can
be used as an enclosed weapon or perhaps
that can be used as a more broad
weapon of disruption and or destruction.
We also have the capability to utilize nanomaterials
to get electrodes into a head and to
create a vast array of viable sensors and
transmitters. This is DARPA's
n cubed program, next generation
noninvasive neuromodulation,
utilizing these techniques and technologies
to create vast arrays of implantable electrodes that
need not be put into the brain surgically.
Now we've talked about the n cubed n
three program
many times. I'll give you the documents again.
Whitney's ark
article for TLAB about,
coronavirus brings up was it the, what's it
called?
Coronavirus gives a dangerous boost to DARPA's darkest
agenda. That's where she pointed those very same
things out.
It's been there for a long time, and
it is literally part of what is happening.
Like, COVID nineteen, the overlapping tech,
it's all part of the same stuff.
They're then able to read from the brain
and write into the brain remotely in real
time. Mhmm.
And there is a rapid pace. Prizes are
big economically in terms of power as well.
But there are risks and hazards.
Yeah. There are conventions that are out there,
but the question that arises, are these conventions
not just necessary, but are they sufficient? These
international signatory treaties has suggested that, no, they're
not. They're really not keeping their finger on
the pulse of the rapid development of brain
sciences, not only within The United States and
its allied nations, but internationally,
And sometimes in programs that utilize commercial veiling
to be able to then hide behind in
terms of what's being made available to make
their military intelligence personnel better and to develop
a whole arsenal of weapons. One of the
examples of that is what we're seeing right
now. The overlap with the companies like Palantir,
the companies like,
BlackRock and and Bill Gates and like, that's
what we're talking about. They use that as
a shield so you can't actually see what's
fully happening.
And then and nonkinetically that can then decrement
the performance of competitors and adversaries.
This
is the the article I was referencing. Coronavirus
gives a dangerous boost to DARPA's darkest agendas.
And we've gone over all this. And this
again, it's it's crazy how far ahead this
was, the conversation. This was May 2020. And
she was talking about general DARPA programs, the
in vivo nano platforms. That even goes beyond
the shot point. That goes that's to the
argument of and this is DARPA's program of
building this, you know, the mRNA platform, but
in your body, which arguably is what they
were trying to achieve and is now part
of what they're doing with this whole platform
and everything else. Then the living foundries. Same
kind of overlap, a much bigger conversation, programming
the fundamental metabolic processes of the biological systems
and the next generation nonsurgical
neurotechnology.
That's the n three n cubed program.
Gone over all of this. An injection of
a virus carrying light sensitive sensors or other
chemical biotech or self assembled nanobots that can
reach individual neurons and control their activity independently
without damaging sensitive tissue. This wasn't some hypothetical.
This was from DARPA
documentation. That's directly from their program.
The proposed use for these technologies isn't yet
well specified. But as animal experiments have shown,
controlling the activity of a single neuron at
multiple points is sufficient to program
artificial memories of fear, desire, experiences
directly into the brain.
You you wanna know where that comes from?
2019.
It's amazing.
Here's the the larger report from 2020.
Neuro team advances to phase two of DARPA
cube program. So now explain this to me.
So phase two, meaning there's ongoing phases in
2020.
I wonder what phase three looked like.
Guess they didn't tell us about it. Maybe
it already happened.
Bioconvergence,
the next thing the next big thing from
Israel. Now they're just one part of this,
but it's always important to recognize that there's
a it's not just this belligerent thing committing
a genocide. There's very much more going on
around this bigger picture.
I recommend you read this. It's an important
article that's been relevant every day since you
wrote
it. 2020.
So this is an important overlap with Epstein.
Also a clip from Whitney Webb.
Insight into why Israel has a leash on
Trump. That's sense receptor saying that in their
opinion. But I agree. And I agree the
overlap, it's not and it's not just Epstein.
It's not even just it's the bigger picture
that a lot of that I've mentioned. A
lot of us have talked about. The idea
of of how Trump essentially got bailed out
by rob by bankers.
And and, ultimately,
even on the record, suggested that he was
more valuable to them in that capacity than
than losing him, going bankrupt. Like, his name
was important. And so the the argument is
that he's been compromised ever since.
But you can listen to her explain it.
Early nineties, Trump's Atlantic City Holdings,
and other things drag down his business empire
and he declares bankruptcy.
And in order to be bailed out, he's
bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later
rewards for that when he's president. The first
time making him commerce secretary,
but at the time Wilbur Ross was representing
the Rothschild,
banking interests.
And the Rothschild banking interests, specifically this Wall
Street, m and a arm that they opened
up in the eighties, was responsible for bringing
Robert Maxwell to New York.
So basically, you know, Trump as a business
icon would not have existed beyond the night
early nineteen nineties if it wasn't for, the
Rothschild banking interests,
who have a lot of affiliations to people
and sort of, the Epstein network and specifically
Epstein's,
financial crimes which include a lot of currency
speculation
in this what the New York Times once
called a currency speculation cabal
including people like Jamie Goldsmith also backed by
the Rothschilds and even George Soros whose first,
his quantum fund in like the late sixties
was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interests. And
if for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family
has a very
long and storied history with Zionism and the
establishment of the state of Israel and and
being a major patron of that.
I mean, don't don't forget, Lord Rothschild was
the one who literally wrote the, you know,
the Belfort declaration letter that we can read
online right now. But it goes much, much
beyond that. But that's just important to remember
for those that have literally seen that and
how denied all this stuff is in the
mainstream conversation.
So, you know, they've definitely had a lot
of influence, I would think, over,
Trump now since he owes them a lot.
And also, you know
I think that's important to consider.
Here is conservative girl saying Trump is absolutely
pathetic. This is just unforgivable.
Unforgivable.
It's a slap in the face to all
the girls who were trafficked and abused. Anyone
making excuses for this is still as reprehensible.
I'm seeing a lot of conservatives whether they
call that in their name or not. They're
very clear. I mean, high level people like
Tucker Carlson who calls this out.
This is Trump on the
again, knowing what was about like, we're gonna
get into a little bit more about what
didn't happen or is going to be called
out. He called it a hoax again. The
whole thing is a hoax, he said many
times. Despite Jones and the rest trying to
give you a narrative for him and claim,
no. No. Here's what he meant. He meant
that they altered some of it. Therefore, he
can't they're it's a hoax because they lied
about the part they wanted. No. He keeps
saying the whole thing, the list, the whole
thing is a hoax over and over.
I mean, it just becomes embarrassing to keep
screaming that it's not what he keeps saying
because we know what their job is. This
department is also sending,
some of the Epstein files
over to the house oversight committee today. Are
you are you in support of them releasing
all of them? Open. If they wanted to
release people shouldn't be hurt, but I'm in
support of keeping it totally open. I couldn't
care less. You got a lot of people
that Oh, yeah. Could be mentioned in those
files that don't deserve to be. Oh, well,
that's interesting.
Yeah. It's like you don't think we know
what you're doing, Trump?
There could be, I don't know, a hypothetical
person out there that might be in there
that's totally not guilty. Like, oh my god.
What up? I mean, does anybody coach this
guy anymore? How I mean, is there I
mean, we used to be under the mind
that there's, like, just political people all around.
They're like, don't wear this, say that. He
just seems to he shoots himself in the
foot every day these days. It's wild to
me. That is very lazy and obvious.
The house committee point, though, it already came
out, which I'll show you next.
Apparently, only 3% of what they gave them
is something new. Everything else was already released,
and they knew that. You also you also
understand that. So he's trying to get ahead
of what he knew would be bad reporting
that said they didn't give anything new. And
the the way you do that is going
get ready for Democrats to lie about everything.
And so when the narrative comes out or
the truth that they didn't give you anything
new,
the DC traders are gonna go Democrats,
when in reality, they didn't give you anything
new. And Trump is already trying to set
the table with maybe people being there that
aren't supposed to be. It's like,
it's pretty obvious.
If they wanted to really shouldn't be hurt,
but I'm in support of keeping it totally
open. I couldn't care less. You got a
lot of people that it could be mentioned
in those files that don't deserve to be.
You know, people because he knew everybody in
Palm Beach. Wow. Think about that, but I
have said to Pam and everybody else I
don't know anything about that. What does that
even mean? See, he does this, and it
it gives it away. So you're saying there
could be people in there that shouldn't be
in there, but I don't know anything about
that.
You mean the hypothetical thing that you just
said could be? Like, you're you're exposing your
own hand when you do things like that.
This is why it's it's becoming you know,
that anybody who's honest about this must be
able to sense that. Watch it again.
If they wanted to really people shouldn't be
hurt, but I'm in support of keeping it
totally open. I couldn't care less. You got
a lot of people that it could be
mentioned under those files that don't deserve to
be. You know, people because he knew everybody
in Palm Beach. I don't know anything about
that, but I have said the time and
everybody else. Give them everything you can give
them because it's a it's a Democrat hoax.
It's just a hoax. The whole Epstein thing
is a Democrat hoax. A whole Epstein thing.
You you got I mean, at some point,
you just gotta listen to what he's saying.
Yeah? That's what all the TeamSport politics players
are trying to convince you that what he
means is that it's real,
but for the Democrat stuff that they put
in stuff about Trump even though he keeps
telling you that the you know, it's it
you already know. It's the whole lazy story.
I mean, these kind of arguments are only
necessary for the few people that might just
not have seen this or might still be
you know, that most people, I think, already
know how kind of
uncomfortable this is.
So we had the greatest six months, seven
months in the history of the presidency.
Right. Of course. Whatever it is. Next six
months will also be the greatest in history
even if it's less. And the Democrats don't
know what to do, so they keep bringing
up that stuff. But it Oh, so it's
only Democrats, not your entire base who clearly
keeps pointing this out. Or the ones who
like, I mean, even like a cat turd,
for example, people are calling him out every
day because he's got, like, 75 tweets over
five days that are, like, release the ebony
files. As long as they come out, you
know it's gonna matter. Everyone has to care
about this all the time. And then the
moment it goes, wow. Who cares?
Only democrat stuff.
It that that shows you who they are.
To them.
The, Bill Clinton was on his plane and
went to the island supposedly 28 times. I
don't wanna bring that up.
Except you literally just did. I mean, am
I crazy, or is he getting really bad
at this? Like, worse than I've ever seen.
Frankly,
you have, Larry whatever. His name is Summers,
the head of Harvard, who is Jeffrey Epstein's
best friend. Yeah. Who is it? What Larry
what now? Who is I don't even know
him. What's his name? Was it sorry. It's
just it's it's not working. Nobody ever talks
about that. I mean, I but I don't
wanna hurt Larry Summers, but he was best
friends with Jeffrey Epstein. No. The Oh, but
the one you didn't know his name a
second ago, but now you know about him.
That's funny. This is a democratic hoax to
try and get the,
the significance of what we've done over the
past
seven months. Nobody's ever seen anything like it.
They say it's number one in history.
We've done
I mean, it's just I'm so sorry. I
just can't it's so dumb.
Everything about this whole thing, that that clip
is gonna go down for me as one
of the worst examples I've ever seen from,
I mean, a president general, but him in
particular.
That's just insane.
He's he's stumbling over his own statements. He
says to who? What? What's that guy? I
don't even know. But now we know him,
but I knew him from Clint. You know,
it's just bad.
It shows you that either he's guilty
or he's very afraid of what people will
frame his association as that we all already
know. You already know he's on there. You
already know he's on the flight logs whether
he didn't go to the island or not,
which you can't prove. We already know he's
got a thousand pictures with Epstein. You already
know Epstein on the record said he was
my closest friend for ten years. You already
know all of this.
Just it's really hard to watch right now.
But I agree. It's anyone's still to making
excuses is sad. And the idea is that
you're claiming that it's only a bunch of
fringe people. I got I mean, you guys
were the ones that largely set up this
momentum.
Conservative girl also says, the Trump administration is
crumbling. Those of you who praise him when
he is fall failing miss massively need to
realize how bad it is. The rest of
us see it for what it is, a
complete betrayal.
He chose Israel over America. It's sad to
think how legendary it could have been. Now
look,
there are I guarantee there are people pretending
to be concerned. You know, like, that's what
the team sport will say. She's not really
a Republican. Because in their minds, Republicans will
always side with the team even if they're
being lied to. The point, though, overall,
I know far more conservatives today that are,
like, in many cases, would still vote for
Trump again if you ask them point blank.
I've done that, but are right now saying
exactly that. He's signing for Israel. He's hiding
the Epstein list. And even but even then
still, I would still pick him over Kamala
because that's how deep the brainwashing goes.
But it's there. Adam says, friendly reminder that
more people have been arrested for antisemitism than
for raping children with Epstein.
Important.
Important as well. Remember how that all came
together.
Now here's Nick's order, showing you how the
team smart politics action is here.
Ghislaine Maxwell confirms she never witnessed Trump
doing anything inappropriate. The leftist narrative is in
shambles.
Right. Because, you know, it's usually important to
completely blindly lean into what a sex trafficker
says.
That's just doesn't that seem a little counterintuitive,
Nick? Right? The
the convicted
sexual trafficking monster that we've all been calling
out just promised Trump's a good guy. So
it's a clear endorsement. We're winning. Right?
Because that matters. Right? The sex trafficker likes
Trump, so he's a good guy. Clearly.
I mean, look, I'm not gonna say because
she said that, therefore he's bad. That would
be the same stupid subjective argument, but it's
just wild to see stuff like that. The
left narrative and again, it's not just lefty
people that are calling this out. Like, you
can almost feel the desperation on people like
this. And then on top of that, it
turns out that he edited what he posted.
Now it says this verse says laugh out
loud that you guys are taking the word
of a convicted pedophile sex trafficker who has
every incentive to suck up the Trump because
she wants a pardon.
You people are such clowns. I agree.
But, you know, just as much clownish as
what the left does in the same circumstance,
but gen x girl caught him. Why did
Dick Sorder edit Ghislaine Maxwell's transcript to spread
a narrative that is not accurate? He cut
lines and you could do look for yourself.
And I'll she has it all posted screenshotted.
Cut lines from page one zero six. Cut
lines from the bottom of page one zero
seven. Merge them together.
Omitted lines that prove Maxwell lied, such as
never seen Trump at Epstein's house. Again, I
did this myself.
You can prove
in very basic ways
that that she's saying things that are, like,
some of the most known parts of the
story.
She's rewriting the history, which we're gonna get
to that is outraging the victims' families
and the victims
themselves, the same people that they all claim
they were fighting for.
But he did this in order to hide
the part that hurt what he wanted you
to think.
I'm telling you guys, I've been calling this
guy out since he got caught lying in
Lahaina. When he went to Lahaina and used
the money people gave him to swear he's
gonna stay in a tent and cover this
and got a five star hotel and then
went there and did not do what he
claimed. Despite what people wanna claim about his
amazing coverage, he was part of the whole
blue lasers and all the garbage.
Overall, he got called out by the people
that gave him that money and almost cried
on air, by the way. I covered it
on show on the show. The point is
that I can see that these people are
out there trying to use what you care
about to convince you of things that are
against your interests.
Fox or at the very least, whatever is
benefiting him in the moment, whatever you wanna
look at it. Fox News aired the voice
recording from Maxwell where you can hear her
repeat the exact lines from the bottom of
page one zero seven,
which includes her false claim that she never
met Trump at the Epstein's house, part of
sorters omitted. Why it's important? In 02/2003, the
New Yorker published the dish on dinner on
page three that featured Jeffrey Epstein's East Side
townhouse dinner with barely clad models organized by
Maxwell.
Epstein's guest, Donald Trump, Lexley Wesner, Clinton aide,
Doug Band.
Putting aside the fact that that it's asinine
to claim a convicted pedophile who's seeking a
pardon is credible, the transcript clearly shows she
lied.
And these influencers on social media seem to
be running interference to help Peto Max swell
in Trump.
She she embedded post for the details. I
mean, guys, you could look at it's very
clear. You can simply look at the real
picture and then go back and look at
the thing he posted.
Well, I just had it open.
I
mean, it's it's self evident.
He literally cut this.
Right? I mean, that's really crazy to me
that he he thinks that I mean, this
is how dumb he thinks you people are.
That you could just will fall for whatever
he puts out. That needs to be called
out. That's shockingly dishonest.
Margot Taylor Greene comes out and says, Maxwell
says president Trump was never inappropriate with anybody,
even though it's not what she said. And
I find it dishonest they're even framing it
like that, which is that she said, in
my presence, when I was around. That's what
she said. That does not mean he never
did anything inappropriate.
But even Marjorie Taylor Greene. I'll say it
again. The Democrats tried to to put Trump
in jail for the rest of his life,
but what actually happened?
You could always pretend it's because they beat
him and they didn't have a case.
The reality is, all the narrative aside, whether
it's Clinton or Trump or anybody else, you
get a big show and nobody ever goes
to jail. That's the most consistent thing of
this conversation.
So, yeah, they went after him, destroyed him.
Multiple tried to Sassy tried to kill him
all these times. Did he? I mean, even
the one from Butler is widely disputed, but
all the rest of them because I never
even really even the whole both the other
claims were random. Some guy, like, three football
fields away, they claimed had a gun. He
tried to kill him. I think I don't
see think they're making those things up. Just
my personal gut because they never actually they
barely even gotten coverage on the third one.
The point,
if there had ever been any evidence against
Donald Trump in any of the Epstein cases,
they would have used it. I'm getting aren't
you getting tired of that? You know, aside
for the obvious point of maybe they're all
on the list or the obvious point of
maybe they're all working together, including you, by
the way, President Trump has been vindicated.
Alright. Because a convicted sex trafficker is the
word you're taking to vindicate Trump.
Does this just feel weird?
True street media says, you know, when I
trust testimony, it's definitely from a convicted child
trafficker who wants to get out of a
twenty year federal prison sentence by playing ball
with the same president who directed a thousand
FBI agents to redact his name from files
about the thing she says he never did.
Very well put.
David Ike, and here, Bennie Johnson doing the
same thing. Yay. We did it. Trump vindicated
because of the sex trafficker we've been telling
you the monster the whole time. Todd Blanche
is Trump's personal lawyer, by the way.
And he was dispatched in an unprecedented move
to meet Maxwell while Trump was desperate for
a way out. Blanche is a close friend
of Maxwell's lawyer who also who was also
there. Immediately after this meeting, she, a convicted
child trafficker, also charged with perjury, by the
way, was moved to the most cushy jail
possible in Texas. It would take the most
a s s kissing Trump sycophant like Benny
Johnson to believe anything she says. Joke.
Yes. But overall, it wasn't just the move.
Right? I mean, she was given immunity in
in this proper deal from the from the
moment it started.
How was that acceptable? But see, they moved
right past it. The I I'll talk to
people right now who would scream about this
if it was Biden who will say, well,
that's just the way police work. You know,
gotta get the bigger fish. You know,
that's not an inaccurate point. In some cases,
which by the way, overall, I never agree
with that. The FBI letting people like what
was his name?
Larry something. The guy the gymnast that was
raping children.
That they let him do that for years
because they it was I think it was
years. A long period of time because they
wanted to catch other people he was involved
with. They let women get abused. I mean,
either way, whether you agree with it or
not, you could argue that's what they claim
they do sometimes. Or they, you know, they
make a deal with a bad guy to
get bigger bad guys, whatever.
The
idea that you can now rationalize what you
would otherwise scream about
is insulting. It's hypocritical.
But overall, the core point of being a
the Epstein connection, a child predator
building this momentum on going after those exact
things and then going, well, you know, police
and stuff. Okay. Even though it's silly,
let's find who's next? If your argument is
that, well, that's how it works, who are
they going after next?
Show me. Who's the next big person? The
she name. Maybe it'll happen tomorrow
or maybe not. And if it doesn't, you
damn well better call it out because they
build these narratives as if this is how
it works and then if it never goes
anywhere else, then that was a lie.
They gave her they let her out, gave
her a deal for nothing or it was
actually for something that you didn't know about,
which is Trump's a great guy
or whatever else.
Jim Jordan claims Trump is totally in the
clear because of Maxwell. It just seems like
a really that feels like a hard thing
to push. The trafficker is on our side,
so we're winning.
You know, kinda feels like
the globalists are at his inauguration. Can't you
tell we're winning? Bill Gates loves Trump's idea.
Clinton said he's doing a great job. It's
all because we're winning. That feels like the
opposite.
Maxwell wants a pardon just how credible his
testimony from a known liar,
independent. You know, it's funny how even the
corporate media is able to see through how
blatant this is, but I would argue at
the end of the day, it's because overall,
even they recognize how flim I mean, it's
like it's the opportunism moment.
It's all it's clearly from the left. It's
easy to make a point about Trump or
could make it about him, but the bigger
picture is you can't hide from this anymore.
Everyone sees this. She claims no involvement in
wrongdoing, which is insulting to girls and young
women she victimized and trafficked. She could not
be trusted.
Says a lot of different people, and here
here's the larger article about it. Epstein survivor's
family blast DOJ for allowing Maxwell to rewrite
history. So this is the point that really
stands out to me. If you are out
there as a conservative Republican who's saying that
this is but what you care about, whether
Epstein or anything else, that you're saving the
children, going after the child predators,
and making it about Epstein and Maxwell up
until recently.
And now you're not not even just making
a deal, but allowing her to lie about
the whole situation that and I mean in
ways we can quite literally prove our lies,
not just because of her testimony, but, like,
other ways in regard to testimony for other
people, in regard to, you know, things that
they've
been forced to divulge because of the way
it all went down in regard to how
she worked, like, as a madam for him.
But just her testimony
from previous from the conviction
contradicts what she's saying now. My point is
that those people that wanna pretend they're fighting
against this stuff, who are now going, he's
vindicated,
are literally siding with the very thing you've
always been fighting.
And are and the victims themselves are standing
up and feeling betrayed.
So if you are seeing this as it
is, you fall in line. You're just as
bad as they
are. As the family of one of most
prominent survivors, Virginia Guffrey, we are outraged.
The content of these transcripts is in direct
contradiction
with felon
Maxwell's conviction
for child sex trafficking.
During, DAG Todd Blanch's bizarre interview, she's never
challenged about her court proven lies, providing her
platform to rewrite history.
And remember,
three hours are missing from that tran from
the audio. This travesty of justice entirely invalidates
the experiences of many brave survivors who put
their put their safety,
security, and lives in the line to ensure
her conviction,
including our sister.
The journalist continues saying the family also condemned
Maxwell's transfer to a minimum security facility, calling
it a country club prison
And warning that it sends a dangerous message
that those who traffic children may ultimately be
rewarded with comfort and leniency.
I hope you're listening conservatives because this is
what's happening. The Department of Justice served the
people of The United States, they scream out
loud. We continue to call upon the DOJ
to do its job by investigating
and and holding accountable the many rich and
powerful people who enabled Maxwell and Jepsen, except
you're letting her go.
See, that's meant to make you feel like,
but don't worry. We're using her never we're
gonna go after the real bad guys.
Well, I guess we'll find out. And how
long do you wait until you acknowledge that
it's not actually happening? Here's
just
a a a substack post I thought was
just kind of because the way he wrote
this was concise. The title is Trump release
of Jislaine Maxwell interview instantly backfires. And And
I agree with that. I mean, I think
it's like I said right from the beginning,
and we we haven't even gotten in well,
I guess I'll just show it really quickly.
House Oversight Committee Democrats say most Epstein files
turned over by DOJ were already public. Now
again, because this says democrat, people are gonna
just, like, ignore it or say it must
be false. How about you look for yourself?
How about you already like, you find out
the reality that they have been hiding this
stuff from day one?
I mean, how clear is it that we
have bonding in them claiming that the phase
one was, you know, they that was it.
We're good. Right? And then everyone called it
out and they go, wait, wait. I've got
truckloads coming in. The file's on my desk.
And then going, oh, now it's a hoax.
You're all weaklings and liars. That's not even
true. And then they get forced again. They
go, okay, here's some more. Some more of
what they just said wasn't coming. You know,
it's it's just so silly.
And the reality is they're dragging their feet
and lying like they do about everything else.
3% of the documents given to the oversight
committee are new.
They're not contesting this. They're just they're this
is why Trump was going, oh, it's all
a hoax. And if you care, then it's
not probably about you know, people are in
there that shouldn't be or whatever he was
saying.
So,
it is backfiring. Whether it's about that or
about the
testimony and the lack of information therein or
the fact that she's being allowed to rewrite
history, conservatives
are pushing
back. It says, first, the setting. Maxwell was
interviewed in Tallahassee, Florida by none other than
Todd Blanchard, Trump's own former colonel defense attorney
who somehow became a DOJ number two. Hours
of softball questions later, which you can listen
to for yourself, it was hard to listen
to, Maxwell magically ended up transferred from a
higher security prison to a cushy minimum security
club fed in Texas, something sex traffickers are
explicitly barred from. That's important. We we told
you when it happened. They're not supposed to
be there. So that means, like, almost by
default that they've already changed that justification over
the, you know, that she's no longer a
sex trafficker on the record. I don't know.
Or they're just bending the rules for her.
All of it speaks to something very strange.
Ask yourself, it says. What did she trade
for that privilege? The transcripts give us the
answer. Maxwell fawns over Trump, insisting he was
always a gentleman, that she admired his extraordinary
achievement of becoming president, and that she saw
never saw anything inappropriate.
That's her line,
over and over. And who's feeding her the
questions? Trump's personal white lawyer moonlighting at the
DOJ.
Instead of prosecutors
pressing her about the trafficking crimes, right, about
her recruitment of of Guffrey at Mar A
Lago, which is what the record shows, about
her role in introducing Trump to Epstein. Blanche
hands her immunity in prosecution.
Or excuse me, in protection. The point,
instead of prosecutors pressing her,
which is what would normally happen if this
was actually about getting people arrested. If you
listen to it, and I've listened too much
of it, to be honest, the point is
that clearly, they were
almost, like, maneuvering away from anything changing.
Like, why don't we push in to find
out people who actually,
overall, they clearly drove this in a way
that made Trump look not like not something
that wasn't, you know, not the not part
of the problem,
as well as painting herself as something that
was sort of a victim, which is what
we've been telling you. Newsmax jumped a little
bit ahead of that and came out and
was like, she's probably a victim for, like,
no discernible reason.
It goes on to say
or was it? He said, yeah. It says,
he says the words, this agreement gives you
protection.
Like, that's actually on the record. Shouldn't the
DOJ be protecting the victims, not the sex
trafficker, especially if they never actually get anybody
else?
I'm not saying I know that. I'm just
saying when if it which I my gut
tells me, but if it inevitably happens where
they don't arrest somebody else, then we have
to come back to this and go, then
what was this for?
The whole charade is designed to erase reality.
They even redact key references to victims like
Maria and Annie Farmer.
Meanwhile, Fox News coordinates the spin, portraying Maxwell's
scripted testimony as proof that Trump was innocent
all along. Here's the truth. Maxwell wasn't some
innocent bystander. She was Epstein's partner in crime,
and she was Trump's friend and contractor or
connector.
She partied with Trump on her father's yacht,
which was called the Lady Ghislaine after her.
She brought underage girls to Mar a Lago.
She recruited girls to be trafficked at Mar
a Lago Spa, which she actually admitted to
more than once. She was called Madame Maxwell
in contemporaneous
reporting. And now Trump's DOJ wants us to
believe she barely knew him. I mean, I
agree. It's insane
how bad this is.
So, I wanna get into some stuff about
Israel, but unfortunately, I'm realizing that my I
I might have to wrap up some of
this and be filled in the next show,
which very well maybe tomorrow if I can
make it happen. But I wanna give some
I wanna give you some of this before
we have to go today.
First,
the influence from Israel on a lot of
this, which is what I was gonna start
the segment out in, but I kinda just
wanna make sure you see some of this.
I'm sure you've seen this before. It's from
2024,
but it really is beyond the pale. And
it's something that we've been talk talking about
quite a bit. This is HR 8,445.
The simple point, it literally reads, in the
service of a I actually pointed this out
on AM Wake Up, like, a week ago
or more than that. The service of a
citizen of The United States in the Israeli
Defense Forces
shall be treated in the same manner as
service in the, the uniformed services.
That is your own government literally writing into
law or through legislation.
I mean, I'm trying to think if that
would be in any way repugging to the
constitution. It probably is in some way. But
overall, writing into law that if you're in
the IDF, that you you are treated the
same as if you were in the US
military.
How in the world is that out there?
I mean, that's not like if you are
in in working together for a US agenda.
That means that anybody in IDF is seen
under this law as a member of the
US Armed Services. Now that's not how they
want you to frame that, but how do
you read that any differently? The service of
a citizen of The United States in the
IDF.
Realize
many of them have dual citizenship, which we'll
point out again in a second,
shall be seen as the same.
So the only difference is whether you also
have US citizenship, which seems to be pretty
happily handed out.
So that means the ones committed genocide
are treated as a member of US. I
mean, that's it just is so so crazy
to me.
That doesn't exist for anything else.
Mel points out
or Dominic says, Israel now considering military recruitment
inside The US
because of a shortage.
And Mel simply says, on what planet is
okay for a foreign government to come into
our country and recruit for their military? What
the hell is even going on anymore? I
mean, you put these pieces together, guys. It's
not hard to see what's happening. It's just
really uncomfortable to acknowledge that this seems to
be the reality.
Here's an example of
Greenblatt kinda letting it slip,
where he
accidentally identifies himself as Israeli. Remember, he in
the the game, the show, he's supposed to
be an American citizen with an American company
who just believes in the Jewish homeland, even
though that's not what Israel is. That's not
what Zionism is.
But he's not supposed to be the, you
know, identifying as somebody who is an Israeli
with an Israeli company. And he even tries
to walk it back. Here's what he said.
The national symbol of Israel
is the shield. It's the star of David.
This Which is a Zionist symbol. I mean,
you look it up for yourself. Even rabbis
will point out that if they're honest.
Forget what it's called, what the menorah, I
think, is the the actual symbol for Judaism,
not a the the the star of David
is a flag for the national symbol of
Israel, not Judaism, but they conflate those things.
Symbol of our people is not a weapon
of war. It's an instrument of defense.
The
the thing that most embodies our entire
ethos
is not harming others. It's again creating a
better world. And he said our many times
by the way, but this last point that
matters. This is fundamental to our tradition for
thousands of years. And so the idea that
our national anthem would be the Hatikvah, would
be the hope
I should say our. It's the because the
whole time he's conflating Judaism with Israel. Right?
And and so our thousands of years, okay,
man, he's talking about Judaism right there. It's
not the same as Israel, but that last
one,
when he he he even recognized it, our
national anthem. So think about saying that as
an American. You think you just accidentally say
that? You think you're talking about a our
Chinese no. You know what that is a
slip of the tongue. That's why it's got
a lot of coverage because of the way
that it came out. Really try to think
of a moment in which you'd accidentally say
our national anthem while referring to any other
country's national anthem,
unless you see it as your national anthem
as an American.
Ears. And so the idea that our national
anthem would be the Hatikvah, would be the
hope.
It's I should say our. It's the Israel's
national anthem. So the idea that our national
anthem would be the Hatikvah, would be the
hope.
I should say our. It's the Israel's national
And sorry for the ridiculous audio being on
a sync. It's funny how that always seem
to happen with certain conversations.
Mark Levin,
in this clip,
fantasizing about Americans being ready to fight and
even die for Israel, urging his audience to
prepare for war.
But wait. Peace president, though, I thought. Right?
But it's okay because we wanna fight and
die for Israel. He claims that real threat
is within,
pointing to schools, media, culture, politics, parties as
being infiltrated by the enemy. Of course, what
he really what he wants to frame it
as the Democrats. But all that is is
a is an effort to get Americans to
fight themselves. That's what it feels like to
me. Drawing comparisons to World War two and
the civil war, Levin insists that Americans have
always risen to the fight. He reminds listeners
of the thousands who died in the civil
war and warns of that once Americans are
angry enough that they'll fight again. Hint, for
Israel
is the point.
Now this is a hopeful point. This is
showing
these monsters like Stefanik. Remember, she was the
one literally handshaking that was driving forward that
lie about p places like Columbia. Right?
And got wild support from Zionists and Israel,
of course,
overlapping with Trump.
She comes out,
listen to her own constituents.
This is what you need to see, guys.
Everywhere in this country, people are beginning to
see this. And these people are still staying
in power, which needs to show you that
we're really not in charge of that, or
it's at least being it's at least been
taken from us.
This is what the people think of her,
and she's in power because of APAC.
Congresswoman Elise Stefanik booed today while attempting to
address a crowd. Protesters zeroed in on Stefanik's
stance on the war in Gaza, barely letting
her speak and forcing her to put her
speech
earlier.
The American people proudly stand with Israel. As
a lifelong admirer, supporter, and true friend of
Israel, stand with Israel, and we will vote
on the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, a
stand alone $17,600,000,000
package, which will provide life saving funding and
resources to stand with Israel throughout Remember that
that for the podcast, it showed the beginning.
She's gotten over a million dollars that we
can prove just from AIPAC, and there's plenty
of other Israeli lobbies. My life, the importance
of the state of Israel was clear.
What I'm trying to show you right there
is that she'll stand up all day long
and say, we, as the people of this
country and everybody in my state, we all
stand with Israel. No. They don't.
Now what you and if you wanna make
that about Jewish people, you're clearly falling for
the lie. Right? We're talking about Israeli government
actions.
And I can show you Orthodox Jews around
the world that called us out all day
long. I have a clip I put out
on Twitter the other day is the truth
about Zionism. It's coming from a rabbi breaking
down for you the basic historical reality that
shows you Zionism does not represent Jews.
People are starting to break through. And I'm
you know, I've never shied away from the
facts even when this was impossible to talk
about. You know that.
But interestingly, now it's becoming easier and easier
because people are starting to see it. But
people need that sometimes
to show that other people are willing to
jump out there, right, to cut down the
weed. The problem is when people in the
mainstream alternative media try to step over that
and claim they did it first because they
want to drive you into the next lie.
At least consider that.
Barely letting her speak and forcing her to
cut her speech earlier.
It is truly humbling to be here
to commemorate and honor
the great John Zara love.
Wow.
You know, I'm gonna turn this back to
you, Mark. Right. Not being sexual of John
from the eight figures that you're gonna turn
back to me.
I gotta be honest. I kinda love that.
I love it because she is not somebody
acting for their interest. She's not acting for
American interest.
And and, you know, she tried to pretend
like it wasn't happening. That is what we
need more of. Now whether, you know, whether
you agree with it or not, the point
is this is what actually like, I don't
think they really care. Like, I think if
she's not being put in place by us,
she doesn't care.
But putting it in their face, we know
what you are. We know what you're doing.
Now, I'm never saying violence. Don't cross that
line because that's what they need to use
it against you. But just, you know, like
like Dworkin Rose,
stand there.
Let them beat let them do something, you
know, use violence until their arms get tired
and you're still standing there.
Call them out.
You saw this one already.
US Capitol Police, this overlaps with DC and
Freedom City Point and the rolling out of
martial law as well as the ICE overlap.
It's all the same thing. US Capitol Police
and ICE simultaneously
arrest a person simply driving a truck with
a billboard that says, you know, protesting famine
in Gaza.
That's the story, guys. It's not some hot
part. It's it's a very public story. They
were striving around, well, of their own accord
in their own car, and they literally pulled
them over and arrested him because of the
content.
There's really no more to the story. That's
shockingly unconstitutional.
You think I mean, they know that. So
all these other cases where they're trying to
give you some nuance broken argument for whites,
you know, would normally be wrong, but national
emergency or whatever else, they know what they're
doing. And it's clearly not for you.
Max Blumenthal points the same story out, says
a source just informed me that the driver
of this truck
exhibiting constitutionally protected speech is still in jail,
but he claims we're getting out on the
twenty second. I wasn't able to confirm that
that it actually happened. But police are keeping
this laptop for some reason.
Right? Because it makes sense to illegally arrest
somebody for speech and then steal their laptop
because he probably hates America.
Right? That kind of ignorance is seething right
now.
As expected, Trump occupation of DC is targeting
all forms of dissent.
You saw this on TikTok, I'm sure. TikTok
has overhauled its hate speech rules, banning users
from calling IDF terrorists, narrowing its policy on
supremacy from con, covering all racial supremacy only
to white supremacy.
Oh, let's not forget that they pulled back
on that and now the White House has
an account on TikTok and it's all good
now, right? Because they pulled in line with
Israel, so now it's okay. Was it ever
about China? No, no, of course not. But
you fell for it as always.
Here's a woman in The UK or actually,
was it, it's Berlin in Germany.
It's just crazy to see this. It's all
over the world, and it's all happening because
of Israel. In this I mean, in the
case of what I'm making here, this is
her standing in front of the police, and
you'll you'll watch it for yourself. All she
says is from the river to the sea,
Palestine will be free, and they instantly arrest
her. And she knew they were gonna do
that. They were literally waiting for that.
If a Zionist says that they get arrested,
no. No. They don't. If if it's literally
the Likud party line at Netanyahu's party, which
it is, and I can show you that,
that's okay. But if she says it with
the interest of Palestinian liberation, freedom,
two state solution, she's arrested for it.
I mean, if we had told you this
would happen, like, ten years ago in Germany
or anywhere, people would have been like, that's
no. No. It's not gonna happen.
Here it is.
Like, are you kidding me? Like, this is
what I mean. And all they said is
you say, you know, arrested. She says it.
She get arrested.
That's Germany for you. That's also The UK.
That's also The United States. It's happening right
now,
if we can be honest about it.
And guess what?
Totally just coincidence, though. Here's Netanyahu on the
twenty first calling for worldwide censorship because everyone
hates Israel.
Prime minister Netanyahu calls for mass censorship of
the algorithms and social media networks to mute
criticism of Israel.
Right. Because antisemitism
and blood libel for things that you can
listen to are actually some of them like,
he's pointing to things you can quite literally
prove, like what they're doing in Gaza. Blood
libel because they hate you. No. We're talking
about you and your government, and your own
people are calling you out.
True street media. This man is calling for
worldwide censorship. Right? And and there you go.
And guess who jumps up and complies?
Grok, interestingly enough, was asked
and was telling the truth about the genocide
and then got censored. You probably saw this.
My account was suspended after I stated that
Israel and The US are committing a genocide.
This is substantiated
by ICJ findings, UN experts, amnesty, Israel rights
groups like Beth Salem, citing mass killing, starvation,
US complicity via armed supports is widely alleged.
Now it's restored.
And here's Grok literally commenting on again. I
was briefly suspended for stating facts backed by
the ICJ's plausible risk ruling.
You have to understand, guys. This is wildly
obvious. They censored their own
AI because it said the truth about Israel.
How is that even possible?
Because I just can't true I truly can't
believe where we are sometimes.
Now, I don't mean just that it's happening.
I we I've always seen this guy. The
how bad it is. Like, how obvious and
clumsy. I don't know why. Maybe we underestimated
how or overestimated how good they are at
this stuff.
But, of course, you know, Netanyahu says jump
and Tom Cotton says how high. He jumps
out and says an organization that supports terrorists.
No. They don't. Breaks US law. No. They
don't. Promotes antisemitism. No. They don't. Shouldn't benefit
from US tax code. Guess who they're talking
about? Palestinian youth movement. Just like they're doing
in The UK, they're literally
a terrorist group now because they protest Israel.
This this and this is coming directly from
the US Senate.
Do you think this guy fights for American
interest when he's literally unconstitutionally
attacking group that's fighting against genocide for a
foreign government?
I'm sure you can work that one out.
WikiLeaks.
Leaks reveal
Microsoft helping Israel deploy Azure cloud for mass
surveillance and airstrike planning. I mean, I've I've
made this point many times over the year.
It's it's actually not hard to see. Microsoft
is a huge part of this. Late documents
reveal Microsoft Azure cloud was used by Israel's
unit a two hundred. What a surprise for
mass surveillance of Palestinians.
Recording millions of calls from Gaza, the West
Bank,
sources inside the unit, and told nine two
seven two magazine that the data was used
for arrest, blackmail, targeting, killings.
Thanks, Microsoft.
It's everywhere.
Europe's growing fear, how Trump might use US
tech dominance against it. Now that's not what
it's really about. It's about the point in
this article. To comply with Trump's executive order,
and this is the the, date is June
2025.
To comply with Donald Trump's executive order, Microsoft,
who we just pointed to, that's completely overtaken
by Israel in many ways, recently suspended the
email account
of an international criminal court prosecutor
because they were investigating Israel.
That's the reality of it, guys. So Trump,
rather through his executive order that forced them
to comply with this, Microsoft suspended an email
account of an international
body entity
because they're calling out Israel. Like, you have
to understand how wild that is. And
now,
Mark Rubio,
four more ICICC
officials sanctioned.
The US is sanctioning ICC judges who are
applying international law.
Now I'm not saying I agree with everything
these groups do. I've criticized them in the
past, even in regard to not doing anything
about Israel. But you can quite literally prove
the claims that are happening. And Marco Rubio,
a blind Israel supporter, will fight for Israel's
genocide over your rights, over human rights.
It's just beyond the pale.
And on top of that,
Mohammed Shehada points out, here's prime minister of
Israel saying Netanyahu says congratulations to Donald Trump
and secretary of state Rubio for imposing further
sanctions on ICC judges.
I mean, you gotta be able to see
how clear this is. A senior ICC official
was just telling me, this is Mohammad Shehada,
that ICC prosecutors had prepared charges against Ben
Gavir and Smotrich for crimes of apartheid, but
never filed them out of fear of sanctions.
Trump sanctioned those very same prosecutors anyway.
Cowardice won't save you. He makes a good
point. If you think you can pull your
punches because you think they're gonna go after
you anyway because you have those ideas and
that's what they hate.
This is wild to me. This is Janice
Girl covering
the influencers. And this right. This is, like,
right now. This is August 20.
Netanyahu in Israel reached out to a bunch
of right wing influencers and had them all
flood into Israel so they could lie to
him about everything. And then they came while
they were there, gave a bunch of BS
coverage about the lies around what's going on
in Gaza, and then came home, many of
them did the same thing. That's what this
is really about.
Coordinated OP to brainwash the Christian right.
Now there have been testimony about this from
people that have done this where they get
seduced by women IDF women and honey pots
and, you know, all the the ways they
get them to feel beholden to this.
And on top of that,
Emily just returned from the trip we just
showed you. And the moment she got back,
she starts attacking people for calling out that
Tom Alexandre
how do you say Alexandrovich,
the Israeli government entity that was caught in
the child sex thing?
She's calling this person out for calling that
out.
That's see, it's hard not to see this.
Oh, look at this. I think they deleted
it.
Yep.
Perfect.
So she deleted the post because everyone started
calling her out. She's the cross right next
to your cleavage is so hilarious.
That's what you have to say when this
woman calls out that your government's supporting pedophiles.
You have to understand that this they were
there, and they come back and they, like,
they immediately jump into calling
going Israel talking points, and now she deleted
it. Good.
Misty points out or as a squirrel breaks
this down, that one of those same people.
This guy's destiny was it basically, it says,
genocide Zionist streamer destiny has admitted to having
child porn on his computer.
Of course. No big deal. Dude's always been
a creep, she says.
That's, Chris Misty saying that. And an obvious
op. Every single person who's platformed him over
the years gets heavy side eye from me.
The point is, here's another example of one
of these influencers that are suddenly, you know
I mean, it doesn't have to mean that
it's all part of the that that's why.
But you understand that people that are doing
this in many cases are because they can
be compromised.
Thomas Massie.
Good morning. I didn't mean that sound like
that was Tom a new point. Thomas Massie.
Good morning. He says, today would be a
great day to tell your representatives to cosponsor
my dual loyalty disclosure act, which they everyone
seems to fight right now, which doesn't make
much sense.
If dual citizens run for office, they should
disclose all the countries in which they hold
citizenship. Right?
Every one of them will pretend like that
makes sense until it comes to pass, they
vote it down. Why? Because we're overrun by
Israeli dual citizens. It's not a secret.
I mean, it's not about Jewish people, guys.
It's in other than the obvious overlap that
that plays in Zionism.
It is clear, and that's why this is
getting fought. That's why everybody seems to hate
him right now in Congress, but everybody else
loves him because he's doing what everybody else
thinks should happen.
And of course, we have influencers. We've got
Congress overtaken, but of course, the executive branch.
NWO says, The Wailing Wall is a fun
little prank the Israelis like to play on
nominally Christian politicians because it's tantamount to a
rejection of Christ. The wall is said to
be part of the second temple that was
prophesized to be destroyed and sustained by the
body of Christ. Now regardless of the overlapping
point they're making from the religious perspective, my
point is that every one of these people
seem to go and, like, do whatever Israel
tells them to do in order to get
Israel benefit. You just need to see how
clearly all of this has influenced this country.
Now I think now really what I was
gonna get into to
to wrap, which will probably take another hour
to be honest, but, you know, one is
just that is Netanyahu
has
publicly
endorsed the great the Greater Israel Project, which
you guys are probably like, yeah, that's old
new. You know, this is real. But average
people have been told that's a conspiracy theory,
and now he comes out and endorses it.
And here in case you wanted to see
it, that's one of the versions of it.
And you it wouldn't surprise you to find
out it's every place they seem to be
trying to take over under claims of being
attacked and defending themselves. And really, it's about
taking what they want at the expense of
everybody and including Americans.
Israel army database suggests at least 83
of Gaza's were Gaza dead were civilians.
Now you already know this. Not necessarily the
exact number from their database, but we said
this in the beginning in regard to Hamas,
for example. The army and their intelligence
said openly that there was no evidence of
what they were claiming. This is the same
thing. Their own databases now show that they
believe 83% of the people they killed were
civilians.
Of course, all the Zionist went to do
dutifully went to work trying to break down
why it's one big lie. Read it for
yourself. It's not hard to understand. As well
as The Guardian article, it did the same
thing.
You need to see how clear this is.
You didn't need this to understand it was
a genocide, but this just goes over the
top as well as the ongoing famine.
Here's Trump saying
Netanyahu's a war hero.
He's fighting you know, they're trying to put
him in jail on top of everything else.
How about that? He's Nuts. He's a war
hero
because we work together. He he's a war
hero. I guess I am too. Yep.
Yep. That's the truth. You see? It's funny
how that's the truth and he tries to
laugh it off. You know, just like there
would be somebody that list and they might
not belong there. He seems to be kind
of slipping in regard to the way he
runs things. But overall,
you're both war criminals, just like Biden's war
criminals, just like Obama and Bush are war
criminals. But clearly, right now, you are aggressively
waist deep in an ongoing genocide.
You can't run from that, man. That's you
know, and you and you all committed an
ongoing genocide with the health side of things
too.
This is Mike Davis.
Pretty big following, almost 500,000.
Here's what he just said. This is 08/16/2025.
A super majority of Gazans supported
Hamas' kidnapping, raping, torturing, and murdering all Israeli
women, children, babies, and elderly on October 7.
I mean, my god. Like,
I don't think anybody other than blind following
politicians and screening Zionists are even remotely of
the mind that there was rape, that there
was beheaded children or children or babies killed
at all of that. They're it's unbelievable that
they're still pushing these lines.
And on top of that, a super majority
did not support any of those things. They
supported the act of armed resistance because you
guys support their genocide.
Easy to prove.
I simply said a shocking amount of influential
people in The US still threw out these
absurdly false and debunked claims on October 7.
Guys in support of Hamas, kidnapping, raping, torturing,
murdering.
Wow.
Raping didn't happen.
Right? That's per the the what the main
woman in the gray pants, she's free. That
didn't happen, guys. You understand that now. On
top of the fact that all the other
things, all the lies about the data they
didn't get or the fact that there's nobody,
and they still shout you down for that.
As I said in the beginning, damn you
for making me have to you know, the
idea that we had to have this deep
and ongoing investigation about whether people were raped.
Damn you.
Horrible people.
And damn you for lying about that. You
know, it's it's just horrifying.
But these kind of people are still pushing
these lies.
Here's something I wanna play, and then I'll
just I wanna point out the famine points,
and then we'll we'll get to some of
this in the next show. I want you
to understand that this this is daily life
in the West Bank.
K? This is what's happening every single day
to these people,
and I just want you to watch this
carefully. Okay? Because what you're gonna see is
a family sitting in front of their home
and land that, you know
like, you have to understand that there's been
generations of Palestinians that have been moved from
their land, stolen from them, and then put
somewhere else. And then they do they do
the best. They they build a new they
try to make a life in that new
place, and then this happens. Or they go,
we we're gonna build a swimming pool, so
we have to move you again, and you
have to pay for us demolishing your home.
Not just it's so easy to prove. It
happens every single day,
all because they're Palestinian.
In this clip, you're watching them get removed
these settlers
walk up to them, sitting at their home,
and start harassing them. They try to push
them away. One of them gets beaten to
the point they get knocked unconscious,
and then the IDF run-in and point their
guns at the people being beat up
Because that's what they do. They literally protect
these people who are stealing, robbing, and raping
every single day. And I don't mean that
hyperbolically. That's literally what's happening.
Watch this for yourself and tell me that
you support this.
They got the hoods on. Right? The one
the the way they would show these pictures
of the evil villains,
they always seem to look like the way
Israelis dress when they pretend to be Palestinians.
Just walks up, starts hitting him for no
reason.
Okay. And then right there,
boom. Just so it's clear, I know it's
a smaller video. That guy
with his full body weight
literally cracked that woman's skull. That's an older
woman. K? So what you're seeing
is the guy engage with him, chase him
off, the mother, woman, grandmother, whatever she is,
raced after probably to protect him, And that
settler went right for her on the ground
and cracked her head open.
And they'll never be held accountable for that.
Ayat. Ayat.
Ayat.
Hayat. Right here. Right here. Right there. Boom.
And then boom again. Boom again. It happens.
They beat her down the ground, and now
she's laying there.
As a sad sad sad sad sad sad
sad sad sad sad sad sad sad sad
sad sad sad sad the guns and uniform
are there solely to protect the illegal settlers
so they can force the natives out. Look
how he points his gun to the people
that are actually victims and allows the criminals
to run away.
That woman is laying there on the ground
motionless.
My god.
Guys, I mean, I just it it's it
pains me to even have to deal with
this stuff. It is so overwhelming.
This is every single day.
Every day. And it's been going on a
long time before October 7.
So
we'll get into more of this later. I
want you guys to understand, which which by
the way you already know because we've covered
it since this came out and well before.
This was months ago. Famine is imminent as
one point one million people experienced catastrophic food
insecurity.
At that time, many of them were already
at level five famine.
And now the I the IPC has come
out
and admitted that it is legitimate. It's in
earnest. It is happening, which we already know.
I see IPC declares famine in Gaza. It
is a famine we could have prevented,
which, yes, is very true.
Here's the IPC themselves,
which I was already following, but now clearly
Twitter unfollowed me. The Famine Review Committee has
determined that famine is currently ongoing in Gaza.
So, you know, you could deny it all
you want. Before they said this, it was
obvious. But remember, with all these big times,
you know, Michael Rapaport morons and all the
rest of the, you know, Rabbi Schmoolys and
liars on Twitter, they are screaming. Not only
this is not true, but they're manufacturing it.
There are standupcom
com
comics in Israel
having, like, tours that are killing about making
fun of AI images of dead children, or
they're all making up famine. How funny, and
everyone's laughing. Horrifying.
Look it up. It's it's gone viral on
Twitter,
and they're lying.
Or that they don't know that they're lying,
and they're just accepting their garbage narrative as
they cheer on genocide. They're starving these people
to death, and they're laughing about it.
I mean, look, even Trump said before this
that, yes, they're dying, and everyone can they
have to be nuts to deny it. He
said that because he wanted to gain some
influence, I think. Because he's still supporting, you
understand?
That's what's so sickening to me. Because he's
literally I've got I'm that was, like, one
of these over here. Hold on.
I'm I'll just go through it real quick.
I thought I had it right here. There
was one where Trump is saying
anyway, the point is that Trump says, you
know, I just I wanna go to heaven.
Oh, I think that was right here.
Shoot. Did I see it? Anyway, I'll I'll
just go real quick. I'm sure it's in
there. The point is that Trump says he
wants to go to heaven. That's why he
wants to stop the Ukraine war. And and
it was actually David Camp that said, well,
then stop killing children in Gaza. It's like
you can't claim you know they're starving and
then support the ongoing starvation.
Or you can, that just means you're a
monster, which is what we need to understand.
Here's an example. Malnourished kids arrive daily at
the Gaza hospital. You realize
this whole disgusting game of going like, oh,
it's just that they all have Bell's palsy,
and it's all because they sleep with their
cousins. Like, it kills me.
Not only because
so it's okay that you starve children with
disabilities? That's okay.
But the reality is they're lying about that.
People as the IPC, every human rights group,
everybody's pointing to they're dying in front of
you. The amount of evidence and imagery and
videos of children, women, everybody's starving, and yet
they stand up and tell you you're wrong,
you're lying, it's fake. I've been telling you
this from the from I mean, how long
ago? How long ago did we talk about
this?
This one in particular.
The same one I bring up often.
It's still there. This he and this guy
is still out there lying about this.
This is back on
02/10/2024.
And it's posted from Cogat, which is the,
like, the actual Israeli
entity
that's supposed to be maintaining the flow of
goods.
Literally, they're the ones that put this lie
out. They're not. This is a fake entity
that's part of the regime genocide.
They say as of yesterday, 15 bakeries are
operational.
And, of course, it only gives them this
weird stay informed because they're lying about it.
I could prove that to you since they
gave this one the actual breakdown, which was
the bakery in the video they're claiming was
completely destroyed back in October.
Right. So if it's completely destroyed, it's not
making bread right now. But they claim that
was February 8. Look at Nusrat. I mean,
I've I had a whole show about that
whole building being destroyed. So not only was
Kogat, the actual Israeli entity lying about that.
Funny.
But this guy carried that over and said,
there's no famine. And he's still doing that
today.
And it's only been worse than it ever
is.
Now,
Glenn Greenwald, an antisemitic famine libel. That's what
Israelis are talking about. The free press lied
for them, but here's how rats starvation
is everywhere.
Virtual tours,
The scale of the horror. I mean, I
I just continually can't believe how clear this
can be and yet how it still keeps
going.
As that old saying goes, right? You know
what you would have done in World War
two. You know right now.
Far more than you know in COVID, you
know right now. The Economist, which supported Israel's
attack on Gaza from the start,
now says it's famine and and that more
than fifteen percent of all children are severely
malnourished.
A group that was literally gaslighting for the
genocide is now calling it out.
Here is
Benny Gantz.
I can declare unequivocally Israel never adopted policies
of enabling yeah. Except for no food, no
fuel, no water, or here's Netanyahu himself. We
have decided to prevent any entry of goods
and supplies,
03/02/2025.
They are all liars, guys. As they say,
liars gonna lie.
This is just disgusting to me. Like, as
this all happening, you get idiots like this
that come out and go, look, it's a
miracle. Women with three hands.
Yeah. Because you made up a fake AI
image, which you can easily view as a
reverse image. You can prove that this didn't
exist before he made it.
Is that it's very and then more down
here. Oh, look.
Like, we're gonna pretend this is actually being
shared, like somebody's gonna make that not you
know, they're making clumsy AI pictures to make
it look like that's what's being shared.
It's pretty desperate.
Here's leaked audio from an Israeli spy chief.
He says,
with ex ex IDF Israeli chief
caught on tape saying for every person killed
on October 7, 50 Palestinians need to die.
Now that shouldn't even be shocking because you
basically hear that in the Knesset every day.
That's how silly and disgusting all this is,
but it's on the
record. Now overall, I was gonna get into
some other points about the the deal, the
the fake thing that continues.
Israel will conquer Gaza regardless of whether Hamas
accepts the hostages. Israel exposed says, well, the
free the hostage crowd just got a little
more quiet, but that's been the statement the
whole time if you're honest with yourself.
Tom Cotton
basically saying, Trump's right. We need to go
in and kill everybody, which what they're saying
is, who cares about the hostages? Go in.
Get Hamas out of there quick. It's gonna
help the hostages. No. It won't. You know,
I know that according to all the hostages.
They've told you that the bombs from Israel
are the mo what they're most afraid of,
that the Hamas members were shielding their bodies
in front of the Israeli bombs. It's not
me saying that. You can look it up.
And so Trump comes out and goes, go
in and get them all because that'll save
the people that have been killed mostly by
Israel that they've shot in the middle of
I mean and then Tom Cotton and the
rest are like, yay. The thing Israel wants.
That's all they know.
Israel has blocked seven Gaza ceasefire deals when
Hamas had agreed.
According to Israeli media, channel thirteen,
here's a holocaust survivor, yet again, telling you
that what they're doing is disgusting.
It's like the fourth time he he speaks
out often about this. And, of course, they'll
probably call him anti Semitic because that totally
makes sense.
Now they also just used gas.
Gas. Enormous Israeli bombing campaign in Jubilee releasing
some kind of chemical agent that is causing
burning when breathing.
As George Galloway says, they're using gas. Words
family.
Tonight, they gassed the refugees in the death
camp, Ghibliya, in Gaza.
I'm just going to leave that with you.
Of course, here's Laura Loomer
coming out and going, but Laura, the Gazans
are just such innocent people.
See, her again, she just can't hide her
disgusting nature that every peep everyone in Gaza
is a disgusting monster. That's what she wants
you to believe despite the narrative that it's
supposed to be that we're going after the
bad guys and Hamas got you know, Palestinians,
even though most of them still tell you
they hate every Palestinian, but they pretend it's
the other way around.
Why are they so cold hearted? And says,
can you imagine the offspring of these people?
Oh, and then yet again uses the MEMRI
Israeli intelligence platform to pretend that this white
guy speaking here is Hamas.
The point is still pushing blatant Zionist propaganda
from a platform that's literally run by Israeli
intelligence.
That's MEMRI. It's you could read it right
on Wikipedia.
It is run by Israeli intelligence. It was
created by Israeli insider intelligence entities.
It's on the surface.
And so that's what they do. So you
see you look at what's coming out right
now. The whole world sees this and shows
somebody goes, little work, get out there.
Here's a fake video. Make it go out
and go hard the other way. Every godson
everywhere is a monster. Hitler Nazi. That's the
kind of stupid stuff you get from her
because not only does it take attention away
from it, it's some people follow. They go,
oh, that video is bad.
Maybe they're not starving.
It's just insane. And this is the person
who's got influential ears in the White House.
This is the person who clearly is artificially
propped up by this Zionist controlled entity we're
talking about.
And on the overarching point is they're simply
just continuing to,
I mean, they stand up and they scream
the thing that the world tells us isn't
happening. As Glenn says, this has always been
one of the most warped parts of The
US finance destruction of Gaza. Israeli officials
proudly admit in Hebrew what their real goals
are at the cleansing, starvation, destruction of civilian
life, and yet they deny it. Gaza City
itself should be exactly like Rafa, which we
turned into ruins,
says
Israeli entities.
Here,
Ben Ben,
Smotrich says Israel's finance ministers vows to conquer,
cleanse, and annihilate Gaza, leaving it in rubble.
You can read it for yourself. It's exactly
what he said. George Galloway says, what is
it the western people don't believe about this?
Anyone in Gaza City who doesn't evacuate can
die of hunger or surrender,
Smotrich says.
I mean, it's not hard to see, guys.
If you if you endorse this,
you are a horrible person.
That's an objective statement. If you endorse the
idea that people who are just trying to
survive either need to die or starve to
death or do or or be displaced,
You just I mean, you're you're
the end of the day, the people that
are pushing these arguments are either
bad people who don't care about people who
are suffering or they are part of an
agenda. On my mind that that's a small
minority of what's really going on.
And understand,
in Israel, despite the the the despite the
fact that literally our government is fighting for
the Israeli government's agenda, I feel I feel
like they have more support in the US
government than they do right now in most
places of the world, including sections of Israel.
Israel police are viciously attacking protesters
in Tel Aviv.
This was last week where more than 300,000
rallied against the war. Now, yes, many of
them just want it to end so the
hostages come come back, and they don't necessarily
care about Palestinians.
But a lot of them are doing so,
carrying pictures of dead babies. A lot doesn't
mean majority, but there is a lot of
them. It's not you gotta be honest about
this.
Netanyahu and his coalition and their supporters have
been in the inciting against the protesters,
calling them Hamas supporters.
These are Israeli Jews who want to see
I mean, you need to see how clear
this has become. This whole country is collapsing.
Now in Tel Aviv, this is the twelfth
before that.
It says, we are confronting the GHF leaders,
CEO John Akridge, spokesperson Chaplain Faye, and their
team. GHF is not aid. It's a weapon
of genocide.
This is an Israeli Jewish platform.
These are Israel Israeli Jews in Israel protesting
against the government and the thing they claim
they're doing to feed Palestinians because what they're
using it for is genocide.
Nationwide strike erupts across Israel demanding hostage deal
and end to the Gaza war. 17.
Now as always, even this broken platform tries
to make it sound like what they're doing
is, you know, screaming at you, America.
Hamas, let go of the hostages. That's not
what they're doing. They're screaming at Israeli government
to let the to take whatever deals offered
to end the war so they get their
hostages back, their families back. That's not directed
at you or Hamas. They know who's responsible,
and they'll scream it in the streets like
we just showed you.
Of course, Pentagon is going to spend $3,500,000,000,
you know, because we're cutting costs to replenish
the munitions that it used to defend Israel
or rather to help Israel commit a genocide.
$3,500,000,000.
What was that whole thing about how that
was old expiring munitions we weren't gonna need?
Remember that?
I guess not.
Like everything else, you're being lied to. Now,
again, I was gonna conclude this at the
end.
Netanyahu cyber chief was caught in a child's
predator sting, charged and jailed until Trump's White
House intervened to make sure he got back
to Israel safely.
Officers involved in the sting say that Trump
admin intervened at Israel's request to override US
law. That's a quote. The point is that
this is undeniable. They lied about it. Netanyahu
came out and said, that's not true. Democrat
lie.
He wasn't even arrested until it got proven
that he was. And he came out and
said, but but, no, he wasn't arrest. He
was arrested, but it was you know, they
they detained him and then let him go
after they questioned him. Also a lie. As
usual, they evolved their lie and get caught
after one after another.
And then it became the Trump administration claiming
that or rather his supporters that it wasn't
even him. There was some other person that's
probably a Democrat. Nope. It turns out to
be very closely tied Zionist that are appointed
by their administration that made this happen.
The interim US attorney for Nevada responsible for
not prosecuting Tom
Alexandrovich is Sigal Chata, an Israeli born citizen.
The person who decided not to prosecute Netanyahu's
Israeli government official for child pedophilia
in Las Vegas is an Israeli born Jewish
Zionist. They protect and support each other when
they abuse children.
I mean, this this is just statements, but
you could prove this. This is my point.
I've gone over this. It's been circulating. Even
corporate media has been forced to acknowledge this.
Guardian wrote a little hard to talk about
it. Here's what you should I recommend you
read. This is from the electric electronic intifada.
Trump administrate
excuse me. Trump administration
shields Israeli official charged with sex crimes.
And this is an, the overlap. That's the
one we're talking about. Over a 100 judges
signed a letter
opposing Trump appointing Sigalcata,
an Israeli born Zionist who does Mossad's bidding
as Khaleesi frames at the interim US attorney
for Nevada.
Realize her whole video they put out, I
don't I I don't think I included it.
Her video to be put in that position
was all about, I'm an Israeli pro Israel
fighting for Israel. That's all it was about.
And trying to go against the one of
the squad because that's what works. Right? Democrats
are bad. I love Israel. Apparently, that's all
you need. And she is quite literally working
for Israel at the expense of I mean,
she's letting a child predator go back to
Israel because he's an Israeli.
And
as Mel pointed out, I said a very
important comparison. Like I said earlier,
do you wanna see what Zionist privilege looks
like? Look no further than this, a juxtaposition
of the criminal justice systems in Israel and
America when experienced by each other's citizens. This
American child is currently in Israeli prison right
now, lost weight with scabies and whatever else.
That man is currently back in Israel because
they let him go.
And you know who's not talking about the
American citizen? Anybody in the US government.
And lastly, which I was gonna get into
more in-depth, I've covered this quite a bit.
It's not just Israel, guys. Five Saudi students
accused of rape, murder, hit and runs, have
fled Oregon before trial. This is back in
2019.
This is only one coverage. So the Oregon
police made a whole big thing about this.
I think it's right oh, it's it's, behind
a paywall. If you open the paywall, you'll
find it's like a a tweet, I think,
of the Oregon police that are calling this
out. How the state department, how the US
government step in
and literally let these people fly back to
Saudi Arabia and get away with literal rape
and murder.
It's an overwhelmingly large list.
So it really shows you it's not just
about Israel unless you wanna consider which could
be the case that Saudi is very clearly
an overlapping part of their story, but really
that your government is just
fraudulent. They're criminal. They're willing to let people
go
that hurt you,
who hurt Americans
because it's in their interest to do so.
It's really not that hard to understand. They
don't care about you. I just wish we
could truly come to terms with that. But
we will have more to get into soon.
Plenty more to get into. Like I said,
tomorrow, it depends, you know, but I'm I'm
really you know, like I said, I'm trying
to put as much energy into this as
I can right now to keep the the
to get back to what we were doing
before. But really starting on the first forward
is when I feel like that we you
know, based on a few things where we're
gonna really I I I have meetings already
set up with everybody to make sure we
can get some writing going again. The point
is that we're pushing back. But thank you
for tuning in today, guys. I think this
stuff is wildly important to understand how it
all interconnects, to understand what's really going on
in your government. And we just gotta stop
hiding from this and acting like it's somehow
you know, always consider that it could be
a lie from somebody,
Democrat, Republican.
You know, somebody's lying because of their agenda.
Yeah. It always happens. To argue it's never
the case. That's a we know it goes
on. But to then use that possibility without
evidence to dismiss things in front of you,
that's just willful ignorance.
We need to be honest about what this
is even if it's uncomfortable, even if it
shows you things about people that you don't
wanna know, somebody you wanna support.
If you'd rather support somebody based on lies,
then you don't really care about the truth.
You don't care about what you're fighting for.
Because, see, I know the majority of you
out there do. Left, right, aware of the
illusion. I know that you guys want good
for this country. And that's what I'm trying
to I mean, that's what I'm trying to
show other people
that seem to look at the Bennie Johnsons
and Joneses and the or the left version
of the same things and then frame that
that's how all Democrats and all Republicans think.
I I think that's obviously not true. I
think they're that's the game. The mainstream media
pointed them like they're all you, and most
of you seem to have different opinions now.
And I think it's important to see that,
that I don't believe most Americans are out
there fighting for bad things or want to
destroy this country. I think far too many
of them have been convinced
that the wrong thing will give them the
right thing. And I think they're being played.
But, you know, at the at the core,
I think you have been manipulated to believe
you're fighting for the constitution, but in fact,
they're destroying it. I just hope you can
start to see that and at least consider
what I'm saying. Because I could always be
wrong, but just consider what we're putting out
there. Genuinely objectively look through this and tell
me you don't see the same thing.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.