It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Reality. Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Saturday, 08/23/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
I think today's show is important.
I put off a lot of different things
I was gonna include today. I did mention
yesterday that I was gonna be talking more
about Israel today,
but I decided to make a a a
very clear focus with the show today, something
that I've actually been pointing at for a
while. I've done a few different shows around.
One was kind of around the larger technocratic
coup conversation,
Prosper being one part of this.
And I rent I mentioned yesterday one of
it was one of the points was gonna
be around Freedom
Cities and and the direction of this. And
some as I was going through all this
today,
this this this clearly stands out to me
as something that
is
not as discussed, not as highlighted as as
as seen as some of the other topics
in the conversation, and yet is probably one
of the most alarming within I mean, it
it connects to everything we've talked about since
I've been doing this, it seems.
And on that note, I I was gonna
put out Charlie Robinson's interview today that'll be
coming out tomorrow.
I just wanted to make sure I focused
on this today. Now there's so much there's
I mean, every day, the twenty four hour
news cycle is is increasingly insane.
And I think it's obviously by design. There's
too much to you know, for someone like
me in particular who tries to cover kind
of the larger scope of what's going on,
it's clearly by design overwhelming.
And what I I'm recognizing more so today
than ever is that there's these you know,
like, ma like, Maxwell, for example. I'll be
talking I'll be giving you updates on that
tomorrow. I'm sure you're all paying attention to
the day to day notifications and what's going
on around the story. But it's weird that
to see the the story
become like this hyper focused conversation when yet
it's not that like, there's less happening in
that this conversation now than there was, you
know, weeks ago. There's developments and points the
things to point out, but it's weird to
see the hyperfocus.
I'm my I guess what I'm getting at
is that clearly these these discussions
are
there to kind of drown out the more
important stories. And I think this is
one of the most important things in this
conversation
because of how it interconnects with everything else,
how it interconnects with Israel and the ongoing
genocide, how it connects with Zionism itself and
the infiltration of governments, how it connects with
the technocratic shift in the world and this
country.
It's a very clear transition that we're watching.
Now, my opinion, I'll make very clear today,
but I don't think anybody can deny that
we're watching it whether you wanna frame it
as the the the new the old guard
and the new guard, a transition
of power, a coup,
the real power structure stepping back out of
the shadows. I mean, there's a lot of
ways you could look at what's happening, but
we really can't deny how obvious this is.
Technofeudalism
is a very important way to look at
it because it's the you know, feudalism,
you know, thinking of, like, serfdom,
kings, and and castles and so on, and
that being you know, we know a time
frame of, like, medieval times to where a
techno fascist kind of idea or rather techno
feudalism would be exactly what it sounds like.
A a version of that, but in the
technological
world where the oh, there's a great video,
by the way. I'll shout out the person
who made it. It was on somebody, Reddit
posted it, some AI video they made. And
I took the the shot of it for
the image today but my god is it
perfect for what we're talking about. And you'll
see that. You might have caught it looping
at the beginning from one of the platforms
that does that, but we'll play it on
the way out today. And it's just this
really alarming view of, like, that kind of
mindset, like the, you know,
like, being a being a peasant and, you
know, a serfdom idea,
and yet, you know, in living with minimal
you know, you'll own nothing and be happy.
And then in the background, you see this
kind of feudal technocratic,
you know,
castle doesn't do it justice. You know? And
it's just the the it's the separation of
power, or rather the separation,
the, wealth gap, and so on. And these
things continue to get worse and worse and
worse. The point is that this is now
what feels like it's being driven in, rationalized.
You know, we're being sold and many people
are being sold on the idea that this
is in fact what will save us from
ourselves. That this is what's always been what's
worked or what that's this is what has
always worked. And what's even more interesting on
top of all of it is when you
dig into this, you come to find out
that that's not even actually what they're what
they're telling you they're they're fighting for is
not even actually what they're fighting for.
They still have the same sort of endpoint,
but what they're actually trying to accomplish with
that endpoint is not even remotely close to
what they're trying to convince people in the
partisan field that they're trying to accomplish. That's
why you have them out there pretending to
be libertarians and, you know, all the things
they knew people wanted to hear. So today
is gonna be a focus on this idea,
freedom cities,
transition, technocracy,
overlap with, you know, smart cities, Washington, DC,
and what I see as a very clear
shift into whatever you wanna call it, but
techno fascism, techno feudalism
very much does fit the bill. Those are
two different terms, by the way, but you
can very clearly see
how these things fit to what we're dealing
with today. That's not the same as saying
that's what they're trying to accomplish.
Maybe they've got the best of intentions and
somehow don't realize what they're doing is illegal
and unconstitutional
and, you know, and you could fit that
in now or Biden and COVID nineteen or,
you know, whatever you wanna look at if
you realize it's just the government and always
has been government that has put us in
this position. So, hopefully, we can evolve our
ideas as this continues to grow and we
evolve our understanding of the way the world
works.
But
don't get caught in the twenty four hour
news cycle. That's a really that something that
really resonated with me today when I'm watching
what's being discussed, you know, or at the
very least, be able to decouple from it.
Because, like, today, for example, if I was
just consumed by what the kind of the
the
social media sphere is suggesting everyone's talking about,
there I would've you'd been you'd have got
the the surface level points of Maxwell's update
and the what's going on in the transcripts
and how Nick Sorter lied about the transcript
on Twitter. At least that's one thing that
I was gonna point to. The point is
that clearly,
there's a lot of surface level information. It's
not necessarily unimportant,
but there's so much more going on just
beneath the surface. Obviously, we see the reality
of foreign policy, and that makes the case
for me. How in the world that's not
just nonstop twenty four seven?
It should be. But today, this is the
focus, the transition of power happening in The
United States and, quite frankly, I think a
global transition.
But we'll focus today mostly on how it
pertains to The United States, save for things
like Prospera
and another example of a of a one
in Africa we're not even gonna get into
today, but all of which tie back to,
prom how do you I think it's prom
Pronomos Capital,
which is a group that seems to exclusively
be funding,
driving forward
the
you know, depending on where you're looking at
it, freedom cities or or special autonomous zones
or, you know,
there's there's numerous names that are being thrown
out there. Now all of these things are
clearly connected as I've been telling you, but
in many ways, it's not supposed to be
seen that way. So the reason I highlighted
on that one group, that's Peter Thiel, that's
Marc Andreessen, that's the whole Curtis Yarvin philosophy.
It's and I'm gonna paint a very clear
picture for you today with things from mainstream
articles, from my own research, from things they've
said that many people don't know about, and
I hope this really resonates with people today.
So we're gonna get right into it today,
and I'm gonna start with the point of
martial law rolls out around The United States,
our show yesterday.
Now, really, this is again, you can dispute
the idea of
the term, you know, whether martial law is
the definition fits to exactly what's happening. You
know, the reality is not necessarily to claim
that it is verbatim what you might think
the definition is, even though I do argue
that is the case. But more so just
the idea of what we're talking about. Mark
being military, you know, what or what people
had argued from the republican side that Obama
or Biden was going to roll out, just
military enforcement.
Right? Not civil, not police, but some kind
of, you know, higher level federal government military
enforcement
over states' rights, over your individual freedoms. That's
obviously what we're seeing
very clearly. Whether or not you think it's
okay, even though it's clearly legally not unconstitutional,
provable and all,
maybe you think they've got good intentions. The
point is that's obviously what we're watching play
out.
So keeping in mind the idea of this,
what we're gonna try to contextualize is, you
know, why I think this is part of
what I just discussed. That what we're watching
is and and not based on rumor and
innuendo, which plays a part in the conversation,
but based on
the obvious interconnection the interconnection between the people
that funded the campaign, the people that are
funding the direction of Freedom Cities, and the
transition into some kind of techno feudal CEO
run fake libertarian
dynamic,
and what Donald Trump is currently doing around
the country with Washington DC and now the
clear rollout to more cities, which is where
we're gonna start, but briefly, because we went
over this yesterday and before that.
So if you wanna watch more on it,
this show is important to watch. We went
over it pretty in-depth.
Thank you for the I just happen to
see it. The, shout out in rumble. Thank
you. Appreciate that for the donation,
which I often I don't look tend to
look on the show. But so here here's
what we're gonna start.
First idea is just the the framing of
why Trump claims this is happening.
The idea that we gotta clean up the
crime. Right? Well, you could argue that despite
the similar circumstances existing last time, that maybe
he thought other things were more important. You
know, us take pretending for a moment that
he really does
like, taking, at face value for the moment
that he believes what he's saying.
It doesn't make much sense when you look
at the reality of the crime breakdown. Now
the argument that, well, they're lying about the
stats. Yes. Okay. You're not gonna have a
hard time selling me on that. Can I
have the evidence for that? We came to
this idea that it's easy. Matt Miller does
this or yes. Not Matt Miller.
Stephen Miller does this routinely.
The Democrats made up the numbers, but there's
nothing to back that up, which, again, I
wouldn't even back at. That's probably what's going
on. But if there's nothing to back it
up, then it's just a statement. And what
we do have, however, are the statistics that
claim otherwise. Yes. Maybe they altered that, but
it can unless you can prove that's the
case, then what are we talking about? I
mean, it's this is what's so frustrating about,
you know, if we know there's lies all
the time on either side of a conversation,
whatever the topic is. I've it brings to
mind a great a good conversation I had
with Shannon Joy on her show the other
day, where we got into the kind of
the the nuance and the frustration around the
Israel Palestine point. And my point was simply,
if we know that there's propaganda on both
sides,
then we just
okay. Then, there are lies everywhere, which kinda
just evens the field out. Right? And then
we go, okay. We engage with each thing
individually.
Doesn't mean you should ignore one side because,
well, there's propaganda, which is kind of what
happens on one side of the conversation. You
know? So the idea is they could lie
about anything. So too could the Republican side
about whether theirs are safer. Don't wanna think
about that. Right? The point is we know
they all could. Now let's engage with what
we have in front of us. And so
the numbers, as we showed you before, thirty
year low in Washington, DC, yeah, maybe they're
lying about that. But everything I can find
outside of those numbers, outside of other everything
shows me that what he's pointing to is
actually not the real picture. Not the same
not the same as saying that there's no
crime. Clearly, DC can be rough. Same can
Chicago and plenty of others. However,
what I'll note now is that the list
of cities he's now talking about, in case
you didn't see yesterday's show, he's now discussing
19 more states of this happening, listing off
about four or five specifically,
which we'll go over in a minute.
Meaning this is expanding exactly like many of
us promised it would, and just like many
people that were supporting it said it wasn't
going to. It's gonna be over real quick,
and now it's expanding. We have to take
our take our time. The narrative shift mission
creep all the time. The point is that
the the cities he's listed off happen to
be Democrats
strongholds, but more importantly, important cities when it
comes to the transition of power, important cities
when it comes to technocratic,
you know, all the stuff you might think
about.
All the main cities, the power hubs
matters when you're talking about a transition of
power or a control. Right? So when you
look at this this is from, August 11,
Newsweek, which I don't know if you can
call it a conservative platform, but it's definitely
not on the side of the left leaning
liberal platforms. The point is full list of
America's most dangerous cities as Trump cracks down
on DC.
So what you're gonna find here is a
list of these. Now what I did is
quickly if if I I highlighted it entirely,
which I'm just gonna list them for you,
but if you're looking at it now, that
means that it's a right leaning state. Like,
it'd be considered a republican or conservative state.
If I just highlighted the state on it,
that simply means that it's somewhere in the
middle.
And that that can go back and forth.
The point is there are plenty of them
that are sort of, you know, it's it's
called they call them competitive states where it's,
you know, or rather cities, which means that
it it could go either way. There's a
lot. There's fifty fifty if you look at
it that way, but, you know, it oscillates.
So when you look at this, if you
look at the top four,
Little Rock, Arkansas is in the top four.
That's that's the of the top four cities
of the with the most crime.
Rather they listed the most dangerous cities in
The United
States. Then we'll wait and see. Maybe that
becomes the next one he talks about. But
if it was gonna be in order of
what's most concerning crime wise, why wouldn't that?
Why wouldn't have Memphis, Cleveland, Toledo, and Little
Rock become the
origin the starting point. You also might note
that Washington DC doesn't even make the top
30.
And that's according to pretty much any stat
you wanna look at. It's really strange. Right?
Now you could argue that he has other
metrics he's going by, but we have to
be honest when we can recognize that this
is not really lining up with the narrative.
Now top four, one of them, happens to
be a Republican location.
Less important for me because I think it's
all the same thing when it comes to
what the government does. But then you can
see that you have Springfield, Illinois, number six,
which is kind of half and half. You
have
Evansville, Indiana, which is a Republican. You have
Springfield, Minnesota. These are all above Washington, DC,
and these are Republican locations. But I'll happily
point out that most of them are Democrat
cities. But, again, if you understand the way
this works or at least the way I
believe it does, it's really inconsequential. It it's,
in fact, this is the way it's done
to play you against each other, to get
you to go, yes. They're bad. So martial
law. Hooray. I mean, that's how this works.
But, really, just recognizing all these different places.
So Opto just to make it as simple
as possible,
if they don't go after these cities before
they go after all the other ones they're
naming, then it's not about crime. It's not
about safety. It's about something else, which is
obviously the point we're making today. Nashville, Tennessee
that's on there too. That's just how I
just showed you that. That's the one where,
you know, I'm in Tennessee.
Interesting, though. Like, you could look at, you
know, even, New York, for example, which we
know is riddled with crime. You know, I
mean, it's just there it's it's we're being
misled about what this really is.
So keep this in mind.
Tree TrueStreet Media says or for well, first,
actually, I always do that. Tom, Tom and
Lund says democrats will call it martial law.
All of their large crime ridden cities have
been run by democrats for decades. Well, I
literally just showed you. That's a that's a
narrative they love to put out. My yes.
You will find most of them are Democrat
red cities, but not the way they frame
it. It's not every single one all the
time. And there are nuances around these things.
Sometimes you have a Democrat city that's the
the you know, within a republican state, which
does change the conversation. The point, though,
they love to make the case that all
of them are crime and is sort of
like every democrat or every immigrant rather votes
democrat. That's just not true. I make this
point all the time. There's a slant, but
it's not the way they frame it. But
it says they created the mess and Trump
will clean it up.
Well, true TrueStreet Media says, yeah. Not a
democrat here. Same point for me. Like, I
don't I'm not a democrat, but I think
you're wrong. It says, but I'm guessing the
reason they'll call it martial law if Trump
puts a standing army in the streets of
Chicago
is because that's literally the definition of martial
law. But, you know, again, you could dispute
that, which people down there do. It's just
the point that, you know, the if if
Obama put a standing army in the middle
of a city, let's pretend like they'd be
like, yeah. The crime is bad. That's okay.
You know that's not the case. So in
that case, it comes down to you
emotionally feeling better about one side, and that's
that's your child. Or at least we have
to start calling this what it is. That's
childish. It's about personal team sport politics.
I don't think that's the majority today. This
guy says, I really don't know what is
so difficult about that that they can't seem
to understand. Truthstream media says, I've I've seen
so called conservative people on here today openly
supporting
a communist military police state rather than admit
they got played. I I hate this year,
she says or they say. I mean, it's
it's it's that's this is the point. We
won't talk about the intel thing today, probably
tomorrow. I put pretty much everything else off.
But this the forcing in basically, strong arming
intel to essentially give the the US government
10% of the company or at least in
you know, there's more to the story. I'll
get into it more tomorrow. But it says
the these are imagine if that was the
Democrat side. Communism, socialism. But Trump does it
good business. You know? It's blind.
It's team sport politics.
Next order says, and this is just to
keep this in your mind, National Guard troops
are to mobilize to 19 states, which I
reported to yesterday,
as as to assist DHS in sweeping immigration
and federal crime. So it's not even it's
it's in certain writings you can find as
I was looking at today, but it's not
being very publicized that this is the same
agenda because it's not supposed to feel that
way. So when you see them pretending they're
going after crime but really rolling out ice
to go after people who are not actually
illegal immigrants and breaking people's faces and busting
car windows in because they're brown skin, then
you recognize that it's clearly not what we're
being sold as. And if we recognize the
immigration crackdown was full of horrifying constitutional violations
and illegal acts and largely went after people
who were here legally and not with criminal
records, then we should probably wonder whether DC
is already the same thing. And I think
you can already prove that. But he says,
this is what 78,000,000 Americans voted for. I'm
so tired of this lazy argument. Did you
so you're telling us that it was on
the ballot that you would roll out martial
law and federalize DC states? I mean, come
on. This these people are children as well.
The idea that you're I mean, or they're
just dishonest. You're just forcing people underneath you
who are also sycophants of the conversation if
they just follow along to pretend that we
all voted for this. That's insane. If this
had talk if this had been discussed on
the stage,
I mean, you you know where this goes.
It's just wild to me that they stand
there and act like this. Troops will act
as support pillar. You know, he says that
because and it's in quotes because he's supposed
to. Because we're supposed to pretend like they're
totally not enforcing the law even though they
literally are.
As he just thirty seconds ago was screaming
about deputizing everyone to have warrantless powers. Yay.
Freedom.
Richard Willett says, lunacy. You lot are literally
applauding a military police state. All this is
just to set the tone for what's happening
right now on the ground. And if you
actually talk to people in Washington, DC, for
example, you get a mixed bag. This game
they're playing where everyone's so happy, it's complete
you know, literally there's police roaming the streets,
that's why it feels so safe.
I don't know any conservatives that would have
ever said that if it wasn't for this
immediate political moment. On top of that, there's
just as many people that are roaming the
streets telling you this is horrifying.
But True Street Media, we played this the
other day.
This is the same thing. Nick Sorter saying,
hooray.
Martial law. Can you restore a constitutional system
by having someone else abuse the constitution?
Important way to start. We'll show you one
last point on this, and we're gonna get
right into the idea of what's continuing beyond
Washington, DC. And the point is to overlap
this with what's going on in places like
Prospero or even El Salvador, by the way,
or the plan that's already happening of multiple
cities within The United States that Peter Thiel,
Marc Andreessen, Sam Altman, and all the rest
are funding.
But we're supposed to pretend like that's totally
not the same thing that's literally happening right
now.
Act nineteen eighty four could actually happen. This
is the direction the world is going in
at the present time. This is exactly what
King George the third did in 1768
in Boston by deploying red coats to police
the city
for their safety.
And I've got people that are responding to
the things I'm saying
that I'm just attacking Trump. There will be
no loyalty except loyalty to the party. I
have Trump derangement
syndrome. No. I have tyranny derangement syndrome.
I've been calling this stuff out for thirteen
years. I have watched us tiptoe into tyranny
this entire time. Ah, and a good point
to make is unlike people like Alex Jones,
who remember they used to work with him
until they left and have told others that
they are manipulators, don't check their their facts
like everybody else, like David Knight and Greg
Reese, everyone else who left. The point is
they have been calling this True Street Media
has been calling this out for thirteen years,
and they're also calling it out today. And
they have never faltered on calling out what
Trump is doing or the new the the
North American Union or the globalist Zionist over
see, that's the difference. Consistency principle, not pulling
the punches when it matters most.
And now we're here. But always,
there will be the intoxication
of power. Where are we warned this would
happen? Under what pretense were we warned
this was gonna happen? A Rex eighty four,
martial law,
specifically
on the pretext
of illegal immigration. We're about to walk off
straight into 1984,
and you have people right now who are
are deep throating the boot. I'm surprised they
can even speak. They have the boot is
so far down their throats.
If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot
stamping on a human face
forever. Look yourself in the mirror and just
think about it. Is this constitutional?
Is our country anywhere
near constitutional?
Can you restore
a constitutional
system by having someone abuse the Constitution?
Can you, go back to a place of
having rights,
peace, and prosperity
by withholding peace, by depriving people of all
that they have and abusing martial law powers?
Can you get back to a constitutional
balance system that respects people's rights through martial
law?
Do you see what is happening?
The moral
to be drawn from this dangerous
nightmare
situation
is a simple one.
Don't let it happen.
It depends on you. And by the way,
I'm not even really sure how Trump's gonna
clean up DC considering all of the worst
offenders in DC
are still on recess.
Right.
Meaning
the congress. Right?
But, you know, it's just it's such a
breath of fresh air to look, you know,
to to watch true stream media, Aaron and
and Melissa, and listen to them, you know,
continually stand by their principles, whether it's Trump
or Biden or anybody else and continue to
call out the same thing. It's just it's
insane to me how clear it is to
look at somebody like that, whether or not
we agree on everything, and look at the
mainstream alternative media and ask yourself why I
mean, I'm just not of the mind that
everyone's just so stupid they can't tell. I
really don't believe that. I have a much
higher opinion of most people in in this
country at the very least. And and, you
know, in general, I truly do. And so
I just it's there's propaganda, social social engineering.
That's what this comes down to. It's people
like Bennet Johnson. Breaking Trump will be mobilizing
the guard. Hooray, martial law. This person says,
the ignorance on display in this comment section
is mind blowing. The same people who were
against government takeover are now cheering it on.
Very simple.
Not very hard to see. So it's beginning
to go further. As we said yesterday,
Trump says he'll send troops to clean up
San Francisco. Well, did I was San Francisco
on that list of the top 30? You
know, it's very clear that this is about
something else.
We even I mean, look. Even if you
wanna pretend that it's genuinely about stopping crime,
and if you're only aiming at Democrat cities,
which there's plenty of others that are even
other Democrat cities that are higher crime, why
would that make sense to you?
It says, look at what Democrats have done
to San Francisco, Trump says. They've destroyed it.
We could clean that up too. We'll clean
that one up too.
Mission creep. Pretty good. You know, it's remember,
this started as it's gonna be real quick.
There anywhere you look. Everywhere he could speak
when it was happening, it's gonna be so
fast. It won't even seem as quick. And
then the very next time he came out,
it was, well, we have to extend it
out. It's gonna it's gonna take a minute.
Yeah. Like, everybody with a brain already saw
it coming because that's always how it goes.
San Francisco,
Memphis.
I'll think well, at least, it's interesting because
they were worried about it early on, but
he said, I'll think about Memphis, which is
weird. But the point is that there's a
lot of these different points of interest. Memphis
is at least on the higher on the
list.
As Trump administration unleashes federal show of force
in DC, other US cities on president's radar
push back. Now it says, Mondiale may has
made it clear the federal takeover of DC
goes hand in hand with the administration's
hard line immigration enforcement. You know, it's the
it's that alone is seen that's missed on
most people, it seems.
And at least, I don't think they're really
publicizing that, but they're, at least in some
cases, making that clear. This is the same
thing,
which is probably that not that hard people
that you know, they go good. Go after
them too. But it's not supposed to make
sense. Right? Right? If this is about something
I mean, other than the idea that you
think they're going after all the worst criminals,
but we can prove that's not the case.
There's the conflict. But it says using control
over law enforcement in the district as a
way to put try to put an end
to the city's laws that protect undocumented migrants.
At least, that's this left leaning platform frames
it. The federal government could slash funding to
cities that don't comply and send in law
enforcement if it as it has done in
Los Angeles and DC. Remember, Los Angeles,
same
ultimate outcome, but did it for a different
reason. Right? So you just it's as much
as they're intertwined, you have to recognize it's
just like with COVID nineteen or anything else.
The solution is what they want. They're looking
for a problem to rationalize the solution.
That's how this works. That's why Melissa and
and and and, and,
that's ridiculous.
Oh my god. That's ridiculous. Just said his
name, like, thirty seconds ago. True Stream Media,
they just, they just said basically that, you
know,
no. I forgot the two. Anyway, the point
was that ultimately, he lost that indeed we
saw the same thing in Los Angeles. Right?
The rationale, the justification. And clearly, they will
use it wherever they can. And so this
says
the federal government could slash funding to cities
that don't comply. Right? So, no, you're already
seeing these coercive measures. Like, this was a
big thing when it first happened. You know,
you have to do this or say that
or or delete these things or we're gonna
hold back funding, and everyone said that's what
they do. No. There there's very clear constitutional
issues here, especially when it comes to states'
rights at at at the core.
But, ultimately, it's about get do what we
want or we're going to take action.
On August 11, Trump announced the and and,
of course, the main the real point is
that they're not really even going after the
problem they claim they are. I know that's
the thing you wanna believe out there, but
the facts simply point to other show otherwise.
On August 11, Trump announced the decision to
declare a crime emergency. And this is what
we knew, a crime emergency. Well, sad the
reality is that there is a clear, like,
boundary definition for what it what need what
constitutes a state of emergency,
not just in general, but the what they're
allowed. Like, you can't just be like it's
a you know?
I'm trying to think of something ridiculous. You
know, an air emergency. There's bad like, they
there's bad air days. There's plenty of things,
but to claim that we're gonna shut everything
down because of x, y, and z. If
the when Democrats did that under the the
the guys of fighting climate change, they were
rightly up in arms. So the point is
crime
is not an emergency. Now you can claim
that there's an a level, like, if you
were saying, well, look. The crime is so
bad that literally nothing can function and people
are dying, but that's not what's actually happening.
The numbers are lower than they're telling you.
So you're just declaring an emergency
to be able to rationalize an unconstitutional action.
It's the same thing when they try to
claim Tran de Arago was invading in Venezuela,
except simultaneously it was Biden that did it
before. That's why Biden's a criminal, but it's
you know, you pick your narrative. It's about
trying to justify it. The crime emergency,
when it comes down to legal reality, is
unjust. But the at the core value of
declaring an emergency based on some kind of
you have to be able to verify these
things. And it says, and federalized DC police
force, which is
I mean, obviously
going in the wrong direction when it comes
to everything we're talking about. Constitutional value. At
the end of the day, Tim stepping in
to do this, especially when faking an emergency,
is wildly
outside the bounds.
Saying his administration was going to restore the
city back to the gleaming capital
that everybody wants it to be. Now do
you think that's gonna happen? I sure love
to see it be a better city.
But if all we're seeing is enforcement and,
you know, just strong-arm jackboot enforcement,
are they gonna stay there forever?
If not, then they're eventually gonna go away,
and then guess what? It's gonna go right
back to what it was before.
I hope not. But realize, if they're not
trying to make it better and they're just
trying to accomplish certain control transition, then that's
what's gonna ultimately happen. But we'll find out,
and we'll see. And and or you're cheering
on the rationale for why they should stay
there is just as alarming. It says Washington's
mayor and police chief were caught off guard
learning about the takeover for the first time
as they watched Trump announce it live, which
is pretty interesting. Of course, it's always with
the guys that we're we're fighting the evil
Democrat deep state as opposed to telling them,
you know if this was some kind of
a coordinated action about trying to reduce crime,
at the very least I mean, it's obvious
that they would at least have to pretend
like they wanted to do the same thing.
So it's clearly, there's more going on around
this story. Violent crime in the nation's capital
has had its lowest levels in decades according
to city officials. Take that for what you
will.
In other states, however, governors control guard troops.
During emergencies, the president can federalize guard troops.
Yes. That's why they did that. But, again,
the legal reality of whether that constitutes an
emergency within that power is obviously not the
case, or it does it doesn't meet the
level necessary.
And it says, as Trump did in Los
Angeles in June. Same point.
And how long have we been talking about
this?
Government what what is the term I use?
Rule by executive order? Rule you know, emergency
governance?
It's been happening for a long time. And
every president points to the other one about
how bad it is, same with executive orders,
and they do the same thing because it's
all about maintaining that status quo, declaring emergencies
for anything, opioids, anything,
how this works. We all seem to know
that and see that during the COVID dynamic,
but now people are looking elsewhere. They move
that state of California's challenge in federal court.
See how that goes? You look at Chicago,
how bad it is. You look at Los
Angeles, how bad it is. He says,
we have other cities that are very bad.
New York has a problem. And then you
have, of course, Baltimore, Oakland. Funny choices. Don't
you think? Yes. They're clearly cities that we
can point at that have high levels of
crime, but not in the top not in
the not these are not the top 10.
It's an odd choice unless you start to
stand back and look at the value of
these cities.
Not necessarily financial value, but the value for
what they're trying to accomplish.
Quote, we're going to make it safe, and
we're going to then go on to other
places, but we're going to stay here for
a while,
he says to dozens of enforcement agents. Funny
how he told you it was gonna be
real quick and it's gonna be over quickly,
but now we're gonna be here for a
while when he talks to the power,
the enforcement arm.
They're wearing red hats. African American ladies, beautiful
ladies are saying, please, please, Trump, come to
Chicago.
Can't we read this by now? You know,
the same way he was going, all the
people in the world were saying, please, Trump,
please make a deal, and then he got
caught lying about that. How all of them
said that's not true. We didn't and then
clearly, they didn't even have those deals.
One of many examples that Trump blusters
lies.
Him coming out and saying a bunch of
random black ladies at the red hats were
going, please take over Chicago. First of all,
I find that really hard to believe.
But he lies about a lot of stuff
like any of them do. Left, right, they're
liars.
And seeming to conflate his depart deployment of
troops in DC with his takeover of the
city's police force, Trump on Friday said he
can keep the National Guard in the nation's
capital, quote, as long as I want
if he declares a national emergency.
Here we are. Right? So, apparently, in the
mindset of the current president, if he declares
an emergency, he can do whatever he wants,
which he basically already said more than once.
Johnson and other US major, mayors have called
on the Trump administration to restore more than
$800,000,000
in violence and crime prevention grants that the
DOJ has withheld
to force states into cooperating. Now this is
really interesting. Now, of course, the early point
you could make is that they're not using
that money to fight crime.
But, yes, we should prove these things. Right?
This is the whole thing. The
the broad assumption that we know this about
them, all Democrats anywhere in the world, it's
just lazy. I wouldn't disagree that people in
both left and right would lie to you
about damn near anything, but we should prove
it all. The point though is that by
holding back $800,000,000
that's supposed to go to fight crime and
then claiming that you're not fighting crime, it
just seems like a counterintuitive thing to do.
But it's saying that ultimately, they withheld the
force, to force the states into cooperating with
the immigration enforcement efforts, which was going on
before this situation.
Right? So they're saying, we wanna get these
immigrants and you're not cooperating. So we're gonna
hold back your money that helps you fight
crime. Then they stand up later and say,
you have too much crime. We have to
go in and take over the city. Kinda
feels like a little bit of coordination there.
But it says these anti violent programs anti
violence programs have a direct impact on our
work to reduce crime and violence in Chicago.
Sending the National Guard could destabilize our public
safety. This is the the administration of Chicago.
And our public safety efforts and would be
counterproductive to rebuilding trust between residents and law
enforcement.
And it says Chicago police said Friday, homicides
are down 31% this year, shootings thirty six
percent. Yeah. Like, maybe you're lying. But the
data that I could find seems to suggest
that is what's happening pretty much broadly right
now, but that's not gonna matter.
So here is oh, and I want to
include this as well just to reiterate this.
Remember, this is something that he's already telling
you is going to be kind of an
ongoing reality. Whether or not it's an you
know, they roll out martial law across the
country, the Pentagon is planning to create what
they're calling a military reaction force.
Just a perpetual ongoing forever
kind of resting military deployment force in your
in, well, I guess, in certain central places
in the country that can rapidly deploy anywhere.
It's saying for civil unrest.
It says the Trump administration is evaluating plans
that would establish a domestic civil disturbance quick
reaction force. I mean, this alone shows you
that this is not going away. And it
says composed of hundreds of National Guard troops
tasked with rapidly deploying into American cities facing
protests
or other unrest. So now we're just framing
protest as unrest?
That's what all the corporate media seems to
be doing now, including I mean, ones like
this that used to be like, oh, we
have to stand with protesters.
It's weird.
And it says and this is dot Pentagon
documents showing this. The plan calls for 600
troops to be on standby at all times
so they could deploy in as little as
an hour.
They would be split into two groups of
300 and be stationed at military bases in
Alabama and Arizona
with purview of regions East and West of
Mississippi River respectively.
Coast project or cost projects
excuse me. Cost projections outlined in the documents
indicate that such a mission, if the proposal
is adopted, could stretch into the hundreds of
millions of dollars should military aircraft and air
crews be required to ready around the clock.
Now they say if they use commercial, it
would be less, but we're still spending money.
Is that what we need? Is it do
Americans want a standing army in this country
ready to deploy? I mean,
we already have a standing army, I understand,
which is completely counter to the original founding
ideas. But regardless, this is about something else.
Beyond that it's the military and the bases,
this is having a deployable force that's literally
on guard ready to be deployed. Like, you
know, as as it waiting to shut down
protests is what Trump seems to be pointing
to. The proposal which has not been previously
reported represents another potential expansion of president Trump's
willingness
to employ the armed forces on American soil,
which is a problem, guys. You understand?
The way he's currently doing it is a
violation of policy comitatus. They they seem to
pretend that when they declare an emergency that
just nothing else matters. It's not true. The
reality is that deploying National Guard across state
lines from other states, that's a violation.
Deploying any of them, Marines in or, you
know, National Guard included, and if they're enforcing
the law, that's a crime.
It's happening everywhere. We've had the Marines speak
up about this. We have images of them
literally arresting people. It's very clear what's happening.
That's gonna be important as this goes forward.
Now Jack House simply points out something you
already seen. We cover this in the show.
Under his seemingly innocuous executive order, Trump has
just made protests in Washington, DC
illegal if he doesn't like them. So unless
you have a permit, protests in DC are
illegal, and they'll be they will arrest protesters.
Now even if you have a permit, by
the way, all they have to do is
claim somebody's being violent and that and this
is left and right for a long time
now. They shut it all down. Shut it
down and watch them deny the permits. It's
we've talked about this already. It's all right
in his executive order, by the way, that
came out March 28. Funny how we almost
knew this was gonna happen, didn't he? March
in March, talking about Washington DC protest.
Funny. It's like almost like they planned it.
You know? It's a conspiracy theory.
And, of course, Church Street Media points out,
like she said in that video,
on this day, two hundred and fifty years
ago, this was on the twenty third. Oh,
I guess that is today. Oh, I thought
that was earlier. That's funny. King George the
the third put out a proclamation
for suppressing rebellion and sedition
in the North American colonies.
Funny how we're right back there.
And then this is what Trump said in
the in the in the past. This I
think this was LA about protest.
This is just it's so very transparent.
It doesn't matter whether you dislike the side.
We all have a legal right or rather
constitutional right to protest,
to petition our government of agreements. Like, this
is what we all at least tell ourselves.
But here's Trump coming out, as you already
saw, blatantly telling you, if you protest, we
are going to shut it down. Not if
you're violent, not if you break the law
while you're doing it, but just if you
protest. Big on Saturday. We're gonna have a
lot of and if there's any protest that
wants to come out, they will be met
with very big force, by the way. And
for those people that wanna protest,
they're gonna be met with very big force.
And I haven't even heard about a protest,
but, you know It it goes on for
another sorry. I just the context is clear.
There's no other discussion there. The point,
be met with force.
Right?
Now, of course, the the ones that wanna
always give him the benefit of the doubt
even though it almost always turns out to
be exactly what the worst case scenario is,
is that ultimately, oh, well, he Majeed's meant
the violent ones. He meant the you can
fill in the gap, can't you? Sort of
like the bigger conversation about the Epstein overlap.
Right? Was well, like, the Jones was just
constantly trying to force in, which is that,
oh, well, he meant that the Democrats inserted
fake information. Not that the whole thing is
fake, even though he's continued right to this
day to keep saying the whole thing is
fake. The whole thing is a hoax.
And yet they still do their do their
dutiful best to go in and go, no.
No. No. Here's what Trump really meant because
you're somehow psychic or you can read his
mind. These people are grifters out there trying
to sell you on what they want you
to think is happening.
This is exactly what it sounds like because
we can see them doing that. Unconstitutional
actions. You know, people that pretend to care
about the constitution should care about this.
Or I guess that doesn't make sense. If
they do care about it, then they should,
but they don't. But this is another example.
This was,
Laura Loomer saying, president Trump says stop the
protest now, back when they were protesting the
genocide
that she clearly supports and Trump clearly is
involved in. She says, see, I told you
he doesn't stand for the free Palestine Palestine
freaks.
Free Palestine is not MAGA. MAGA doesn't support
terrorism. Donald Trump is a Zionist. Yeah. And
they don't want you to see that now,
but that's the case. It is, and we
know that. And he said, stop the protests
now. Protest.
Why? Because Israel didn't like it. And what'd
they do? They flooded it with Zionists that
were throwing things at, hitting them with boards.
It's all on the video today. You can
clearly see them. And the police stood there
and watched it. And I'm not talking about
just one video that I care to look
at to pretend it's the whole thing. I'm
talking the entire situation. The ongoing look of
hours of video that can clearly show you
our testimony from people that were there, Jewish
people included, who literally were there with them,
or that the fact that all of these
protests were largely put on by Jewish organizations.
But people like vile Laura Loomer don't care
about that. But Adam Green says, Trump said
shut it down to the college protests.
It's all easy to see, guys.
And now Greg Reese is pointing out a
good what we should be doing if we
care about what we claim we believe in
this country. He says, you this is the
proper response. If you celebrate martial law, you're
not American. Well, I get what he's saying,
but I would I I don't like right
now, we're getting a lot from the Republican
side that says, like, you know, if you
don't do this, you're not American. Right? Just
because you're born here doesn't make you American.
That's wrong, by the way. Yes. It does.
But the point is
you're an American regardless.
If you believe in martial law, you're still
an American, guys. It just mean you just
don't understand or at least you don't care
about the foundational ideas of this country. But
you're you're still an American. Right? But his
point is simply that you don't believe in
these values, which I agree with. And or
or you're pretending to or you don't understand
them. Right? But here, this person says, a
large crowd clashes
chases law enforcement out of Columbia Heights in
Washington, DC. Dozens boo and chant ICE, go
home, until they return to their vehicles and
leave the area. Now ask yourself, why is
it largely ICE as well?
Well, first, because there there is immigration they're
still doing.
But realize that it's become the national gestapo,
guys. That's the point. That's what you're gonna
see roll out in situations whether or not
it's immigration related. It's enforcement.
Even though that doesn't really make sense when
you you know,
even legal at the end of the day.
But the point is, these people chase them
away.
And and by the way, successfully,
we're able to get them to leave. We
saw this just the other day. Let me
just turn this down.
I was just gonna mute it for the
moment. But we saw we saw this on
the barbershop the other day, right, where they
were literally trying to force their way into
a barbershop without a warrant. There's no way
around that. That's a crime. And people were,
you know, where's your warrant? Who identify yourselves.
And they they left because people were filming
them and they were clearly you know, they
know what they're doing is wrong. They just
know they've got the backing of the administration.
But you can see this. There you know,
people are literally
non violently
to to their, you know, their chagrin. Like,
they they want you to be violent so
they can rationalize whatever they wanna do, but
they drove them away. Crowds cheer and celebrate
once law enforcement leaves.
That's what you gotta do, guys. Stand up
for your rights.
And, yeah, you know, as as, Larkin Rose
would say, you you know, you may get
hit beat. Right? You have to but the
the point is, if you stand there peacefully
as a crowd, eventually their arms will get
tired.
It's that, you know, may not sound what
you may doesn't make you happy, but it's
it's an important thing to think about.
Stand your ground.
Because not only are you right,
and I mean in a non violent way,
the point is that eventually,
they will give up. When it really comes
to like, I'm talking like if it's, you
know, the whole country. They can't put everybody
in a jail cell. They'll sure as hell
try. I I don't wanna test that that
reality either, but the point is that we
need to stand up for these things if
we really care about them.
Now,
this very importantly overlaps
with
many different points of the conversation.
Right? The the Washington DC multistate
roll out martial law. Like, so you could
just argue that they're just, you know, with
they're maybe even Trump doesn't know. It's just
really about enforcement and people in char people
in place.
I do believe he they I my opinion
is that he's very much aware of this,
and I'm gonna paint a picture for why
I think that is. How obviously you have
Peter Thiel and, you know, and and Vance
who's literally an extension of that and most
almost every part in his cabinet. Oh, by
the way, which Palantir and Thiel and the
rest of them are very much overlapped with
Israel, which we're not even gonna get much
into today. I wasn't even planning on bringing
it up today just to make at this
point very clear, but it comes out in
one of these articles that I wasn't expecting.
Literally calling what we're discussing today Tech Zionism.
I almost put in the title, but I
don't wanna make it about that today. But
it's impossible to decouple these things. But the
point is that Donald Trump is either overtaken
by this, all of this, or very much
a part of it.
And this is a great article from
Derek Rose. Meet the Peter Thiel acolytes in
Donald Trump's second administration.
Just important to read if you wanna understand
just the Peter Thiel in overlap, but he
goes on to point out Curtis Yarvin, which
I'll include as well. This is part two.
Meet the man whose philosophy has influenced Peter
Thiel and the technocrats.
Great article. I'm only gonna read a quick
part of this, and we're gonna go into
his overlap. Now the reason this is important,
guys, is to kind of set the mindset
for what this is and why you'll see
why this connects.
Clearly, I'm sure you already get the picture
of what we've already talked about if you
watch this show. Prospera and the funding and
the kind of ideological
change that's happening. The point is that people
like Curtis Yarvin and Vance and Tiela and
Andreessen and Karp and all the rest have
this very alarming mindset, which I'm gonna paint
very clearly for you as we go through
the rest of this. And that is it
is driving this mindset, this idea that somehow
we need oligarchs to rule our lives. Otherwise,
we're never gonna be happy. Doesn't that sound
very familiar?
It should. It's coming from the same place.
As it becomes clear the acolytes of technocrat
and faux libertarian Peter Thiel will wield power
in the second Trump administration,
it is increasingly important to understand some of
the influences behind Thiel and his fellow technocrats.
One of the largest influences on Thiel's thinking
is a man named Yacartis Yarvin,
sometimes known by his pen name, at least
before he was writing almost entirely
behind that name and I wasn't making it
clear that he was who he was. But
but that he's I don't know if he
still used it, but the point is his
name at that time was,
Mencius Moldbug.
Yarvin and fellow philosopher Nick Land founded the
school of thought known as the dark enlightenment
or the neo reactionary movement.
Very weird to see something like
dark MAGA and Elon Musk with this whole
thing. Like, it's you know,
sure could just be coincidence, I guess, but
I'll let you think about that. While Yarvin's
writing and influence has mostly been on the
edges of the mainstream, In the last decade,
his appeal has grown to the point that
he is now being interviewed by the New
York Times and cited as the philosopher influencing
the MAGA movement. Now, this article was written
in February 2025. Now, this is really just
that's all just that alone I wanna show
you and it's really about Derek's kind of
framing, but also this one personal note. He
says, I first became aware of Yarvin and
his ideas in 2016 when I noticed what
was then known as the alt right infiltrating
American libertarian circles.
In my 2017
essay, Derek speaking, removing the alt right infection
on the American libertarian movement, I detailed what
I saw as a pipeline
from the libertarian movement to the alt right
as self professed libertarians.
Voluntarists
and anarchists joined the burgeoning Trump movement.
And we saw this after the Trump the
last administration
where we I mean, we've talked about it
many times. Like, diehard libertarians, the anarchists even,
suddenly became status because they thought Trump was
the guy. It was very weird. Or they
never really believed what they claim. We still
see it happening today. There's plenty of libertarians
out there that somehow rationalize supporting a state
a statist military police state happening.
But overall, the idea that we see this
this you know, the simplest way to put
it, and it happens everywhere, is people like
whoever
Teal and all of them
pretending to be libertarians to get inside a
certain movement
to do what they're doing now. At least
that's how I see it. Curtis Yarvin confirms
his close relationship with Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel,
and his influence over JD Vance.
Now
an article from Time Maga or, yeah, I
guess, just Time. We call it Time Magazine
still. 03/24/2025.
What we must understand about the dark enlightenment
movement. Just a few things I wanna point
out for this. Most of these articles overlap,
and there's points they all kinda make. But
there's certain points I wanna pluck out of
some of these to make you to paint
a really clear picture here.
Now it says the rise
of the dark enlightenment movement and its most
vocal steward, software engineer and blogger Curtis Yarvin.
A software engineer by training, Yarvin has become
a kind of official philosopher for the tech
leaders like PayPal cofounder Peter Thiel
and Mozow Mosaic founder Marc Andreessen.
You're gonna find the same circle in everything
we're discussing today, even though they're not supposed
to really be the same conversation.
Not unlike the futurist, Yarvin advocates for replacing
democracy, if you wanna pretend that's what we
have,
with a kind of techno feudal state. That's
literally what they're like, this is their terminology,
their discussion points. I I don't think he
necessarily says techno feudal state, but we'll go
through it. It's literally what they're outlining. And
it says, for the government to be run
like corporations. Isn't that what we keep hearing
about this, you know, Trump's administration and what
they wanna do with freedom cities? And it
says, with the president as its CEO.
The new system, it is in lit is
the new system is elitist.
Quote, humans fit into dominant submission structures,
Yarvin wrote in 02/2008,
and it's authoritarian.
So realize this guy who is very much
the philosophy
behind or, you know, is the driving philosophical
force behind
most of Trump's administration and people driving it,
and he's talking about fit humans fit into
dominant submission structures.
And it gets worse, far far worse. As
for Yarvin's controversial opinions and whether or not
Thiel holds them, Yarvin has said this
said that his patron is fully enlightened. Talking
about Thiel. He has been coaching Thiel. What's
more, in a recent interview with the Hoover
Institution, Andreessen quoted Yarvin and called him a
friend. You know, clearly, just there's very clear
overlap here. If not, you know,
it's there's an agenda around it all.
Using a variety of mixed metaphors, Yarvin advocates
for a butterfly revolution,
a, quote, full power start to The US
Government accomplished by giving absolute
sovereignty, is the word they use, to a
single organization.
This is imagined as an internal coup
meant to privatize the government and replace democracy
with complete executive authority. Okay.
Well, damn it if that doesn't feel like
exactly what's what we're watching right now. Right?
So may you could argue they just believe
the idea,
but I think you sense that I believe
there's something else going on.
So they're literally outlining what they're discussing. And
trust me, we're gonna go through it more
outlining what their mindset is. But I wanted
you to hear this first.
It is imagined as an internal coup
meant to privatize the government and replace democracy
or whatever we have with a executive authority.
I mean, guys, that's I mean, to a
t, what is happening right now. I think
we're watching a transition of power. Zionist technocrat
globalist.
I think it's very clear.
And that we're watching them privatize
public private partnerships.
I mean, it's very, very clear and that
they're ultimately trying to transition out of this
as they're trying to tell you. I mean,
it's literally on the surface of the conversation.
It's a very public, it seems, transition of
power. Now it says when courts prevent unconstitutional
orders,
Yarvin says they should just be ignored. Yeah.
Exactly. Now that that point's been made by
a lot of people because it's very clearly
what they're currently doing.
And it's what they all seem to do,
but, I mean, it's be it's, like, really
seems to have been embodied by the Trump
current Trump administration.
It says that so much of this seems
to mirror the actions of the Trump administration,
and Doge may not be a coincidence.
I agree. Yarvin's musings in '29 in 2009
that the definition of a sovereign
is that a sovereign is above the law.
Interesting. Well, I don't disagree with that in
certain context, but it's the way that they're
viewing this. Right? That so so somehow that
not not everybody's a sovereign. Right? That's that's
the way this is being viewed. Hold a
mirror to Trump's February tweet that
he who saves his country violates no law.
In fact, I'll grab that so we can
include that for the show. But interesting. Right?
I mean, that's this is the whole thing.
That's why people oh, it's the article. I
thought it was gonna be tweet all included
either way.
The point is we saw him. It was
very Machiavellian. Nope. I think it was a
referencing Napoleon quote. The point is that that
is what this ideology is. As I nodded
to then, but we're gonna make it very
clear today.
Yeah. Let's let me try and miss that.
Okay. So this this is just one quick
point from the New Yorker.
Curtis Yarvin's plot against America,
06/02/2025.
Very quickly, just two points on this.
Yarvin proposes that nations should eventually be broken
up into what he calls a patch work
of star of statelets,
like Singapore, Dubai, each with its own sovereign
ruler.
Right? Not you, but them. They're the ones
above the law. You you have to abide
by whatever the technocrat rulers say. The eternal
political problems of legitimacy,
accountability, and succession would be solved by a
secret board
with the power to select and recall the
otherwise all powerful CEO of each sovereign corporation
or Sovcorp.
Right. So what I see this as is
they get to be the board. Right? They're
the elitist of the top of the you
owe nothing and be happy dynamic. Right? They
own everything, not you, but they'll do it
so you can be happy with what they
want you to like, the idea is that
they'll be the ones above everything. They're the
sovereigns, and, ultimately, they can go, well, now
the CEO is not doing what we like
when we're moving, put somebody else in. In
what world do you think that's somehow gonna
embody what you want?
Prospera and others are showing you that right
now. Yarvin's
congenial
cynicism
about governance disappears as soon as he starts
talking about dictatorial regimes.
Yarvin is very fond of El Salvador. He
has kind of he has kind words for
El Salvador strongman, Bukele. Now realize Bukele, again,
is a very proud Zionist. He's made that
clear. It overlaps with all the things we're
talking about. Now what I'm gonna show you
is what they're doing in El Salvador is
is an overlap to this. And there is
association with all of them and what they're
doing, including the Trump administration as we all
know.
These are different, in my mind, trial balloons
for what this idea is. And El Salvador
is the same thing we're gonna see in
Prospera. The illegal action, the removal of judges
to initiate what they want, the suspension of
civil liberties,
everywhere you look right now.
And it says even Trump's most pessimistic critics
have been startled by the speed at which
the president, in his second term, has moved
to impose autocracy
on America,
concentrating power in the executive branch and often
enough in the hands of the richest men
on Earth. How who can deny that? But
just because you wanna say that that's what's
best for us or it doesn't change that
that's what's happening and that is what we
shouldn't be wanting in this country or anywhere.
That's not what's in in
in the interest of freedom
or or and also that it aligns with
exactly what this ideology is.
Now twenty twenty four, June twenty second, where
JD Vance gets his weird terrifying techno authoritarian
ideas.
In 02/2008, a software developer in San Francisco
named Curtis Yarvin, writing under the pseudonym as
we pointed out earlier,
proposed a horrific solution
for people he deemed not productive. Actually, I'll
grab this really quickly since this is obviously
relevant.
Oh, what was that?
Oh, now I'm gonna forget it. It's it
was the point of it was the the
article, the show we did about Taylorism.
Alright. Derek's article, actually. I can't remember now.
Shoot. I'll try to grab it when we
go back. It it was a precursor to
the whole, you know, everything we're talking about.
To even the eugenics and and,
what is the word I'm looking for? You
know, to technocracy and all of this, but
it's about the idea of you know, it
was the guy that timed things with a
watch and was trying to shave seconds off
the production,
Right. You know, which, you know, you could
argue that that is not necessarily bad, but
it took a really hard turn
into,
look, what we're watching today. Right? Invasive control
of your life for the betterment of all
of us or not really at the end
of the day.
But that was the point that may come
came to my mind, right, that people are
not deemed productive.
Right? You know, why they get to dictate
whether you are or not what you're supposed
to be is the part is the problem.
Convert them into biodiesel, he said, which can
be help power the minibuses.
Now Yarvin, a self described reactionary and extremist
who was 35 years old at the time,
clarified later that he was just joking. But
then he continued, the trouble with the biodiesel
solution is that no one would want to
live in a city whose public transportation was
fueled,
even just partly, by the distilled remains of
its late underclass.
Yeah. Very funny joke. However, it helps us
describe the problem we are trying to solve.
Oh, does it? Our goal, in short, is
a humane alternative to genocide. That is his
that is what he wrote.
Shouldn't that I mean, that alone should terrify
us because this is guiding
the mindset policy of people in power.
The idea that you're like, even the joke,
that is a joke for authoritarian
sociopaths.
You know? Yeah. They wouldn't like it if
we fueled the trucks with their dead bodies.
You know?
It's not funny to anybody other than those
who kinda go, yeah. Maybe we should. You
know? Like, that's that's insane. And on top
of that, it overlaps the whole technocratic, like,
the whole,
bio, what is it called?
Blanking a lot of words today. You know,
that, you know, that we talked about that
in the overlap of turning human bodies into
into material that can be used. It's a
real conversation. But the overall point is, in
our in short, his goal is, quote, what
he said, is a humane alternative to genocide.
Then he concluded that the, quote, best humane
alternative to genocide is to virtualize
these people, meaning people like us,
imprison them in permanent solitary confinement, what he
wrote, where, quote, to avoid making them insane,
though, they would be connected to an immersive
virtual reality interface so they could experience a
rich fulfilling life and completely imaginary world, of
course. Like like, that movie with the, you
know, the cartoon, Wall E, I think, where
they're all on the big ship and they're
all on their thing. You know? That's not
a joke, by the way.
Let let let you live in your in
your metaverse.
Whitney and I talked about that a long
time ago. These things are all falling into
place, guys. It says Yarvin's disturbing
manifestos
have earned him influential followers. Think about the
kind of people that read those things and
go, oh, I like that guy. I I
wanna I wanna follow his ideas.
Chief among them,
people that are loving the ideas and following
him, people like Peter Thiel
and his one time Silicon Valley protege,
JD Vance,
whom the Republican party just nominated. This is,
of course, November 2024 to Donald Trump's vice
president. If Trump wins the election, there is
little doubt that Vance will bring Yarvin's twisted
techno authoritarianism
to the White House. And one can imagine
with horror what a receptive would be autocrat
like Trump might do with those ideas. Of
course, from anybody who is paying attention's perspective,
it's the same difference as Biden or Obama
or all the rest. They're all not even
would be autocrats. They're they are exactly that.
And now it says, way back in 2012,
in a speech on how to reboot the
US government,
he he said, and this is, Yarvin,
if Americans want to change their government,
they're going to have to get over their
dictator phobia.
Yeah. They said that. He said he had
also written favorably of slavery and white nationalists
in late,
in late aughts,
though he said though he has stated that
he is not a white nationalist himself.
But the thing that stands out to me
more than any than, you know, ideas about
racism or whatever else or pro slavery. You
know? Yeah. I I could, point out how
ridiculous that is or how unobserved it is
to promote anything that's putting, you know,
what any what the idea of slavery in
itself. Like, how anybody that could argue for
that. That's just insane. But the point that
stands out more than anything is the we
need to get over our phobia of dictators
because they they're
transitioning you into the idea that we need,
like, put a good dictator, which is, by
the way, exactly what people are saying.
Right? That or even that it was, what
I think Trump or even like an Alex
Jones point. Right? Said that my fam my
family is tied to deep state, but we're
the deep good deep state fighting the bad
these days. That's in that's just crazy.
That was something they said out loud. And
it says Max Chofkin describes Yarvin as the
house political philosopher of the Thialverse, a term
for people in Thial's unit as orbit. In
2016, Yarvin attended Thial's election night party in
San Francisco, where according to Chofkin,
champagne flowed once it became clear that Thiel's
investment in Donald Trump would pay off.
Vance owes his meteoric rise to Peter Thiel,
who largely bankrolled it, which you all know.
But for those that don't, it's worth pointing
out. As a Yale Law student in 2011,
he heard Thiel give a speech in which
or as the story goes, in which he
suggested that smart people should be working in
tech instead of wasting their time in elite
schools.
Afterward, Vance emailed Thiel,
who invited him to California. Following a brief
stint as a lawyer, Vance moved to San
Francisco.
Eventually, he landed at Mithril Capital, a company
cofounded by Thiel.
When Vance moved back to Ohio and eventually
started his own fund, Narya Capital,
both Thiel and Marc Andreessen invested in it.
When Vance ran for US senate in 2022,
Thiel spent an unprecedented
$15,000,000
on the campaign and
persuaded Trump to endorse him. Vance had previously
compared Trump to Hitler.
Like all the rest of them, by the
way. Marco Rubio, pretty much everyone.
Mark Musk.
Terrible things about Trump until suddenly they're all
friends. You know, it's it's always what's going
on behind the scenes. The the point is
whether they like each other or not, it's
not about that is the point.
In 2024,
Thiel led the charge to convince Trump to
pick Vance as his VP.
Vance is a Thiel creation. And like his
billionaire benefactor who once wrote, quote, I no
longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.
Vance embraces a radical ideology hell bent on
destroying government as we know it, and they
got these ideas, at least in part, from
Yarvin. Now look. Maybe you believe that.
I'm not I'm an advocate for democracy, mob
rule. I have a very different opinion of
this, but at least that's more of the
direction of some semblance of freedom than a
dictatorial
regime. But overall,
maybe you agree with that statement.
But the point that that needs to be
made here is that that's not what they're
claiming.
Trump and Vance freedom and democracy and they
that that but,
clearly, their ideology is not driving in that
direction.
So even if you agree with this, then
you need to acknowledge they're just lying to
everybody, probably because they know most people don't
want that.
It says Yarvin in the chi is the
chief thinker behind an obscure
but increasingly
influential far right neo reaction movement some call
the dark enlightenment.
Among other things, it openly promotes dictatorships
as superior to democracies
because it's like a CEO, that's the point,
and views nations like The United States as
outdated software systems. Yarvin seeks to reengineer governments
by breaking them up into smaller entities called
patchworks, which would be controlled by tech corporations.
Entities called patchworks, which would be controlled by
tech corporations. Each patchwork would be ruled by
a realm, a corporation with absolute power. Because
we know how well corporations, you know
clearly, they're super, you know,
God, every word is slipping my mind today.
You know, benevolent is what I was looking
for. Clearly, they've shown us throughout history. Right?
The corporations will always do what's right. I
mean, it's just that's such an insane thing.
You give them more power, it's only gonna
get worse.
But it says citizens would be free to
move, but every other realm would also be
ruled by corporate governments with chilling impunity.
In Fristcorp,
as Yarvin calls the San Francisco realm, it
all seeing Orwellians
oh, let's let's point out, by the way,
San Francisco is now on the chopping block
for this totally different thing about DC breaking
down crime and all that. Not the same
thing as this discussion because we can't obviously
point you know, I'm being facetious, obviously. I
mean, it's so obvious that these are things
they've pointed to and states
cities that they want to go into. It's
now that's now being rationalized by the claims
Trump is making. And and realize when they
do this, what do you think they're using?
Palantir surveillance? The the
the biometric testing they did in Gaza that
are rolled out by ICE? The in the
implementation
of the infrastructure
for what this is. That's what's happening.
Now it says, all residents,
excuse me, and all seeing Aurelian surveillance system
would enforce public safety.
Isn't that what we keep hearing from people
like Larry Ellison and yes.
It says all residents, even temporary visitors, carry
an ID card with an RFID response. Now,
of course, that's then. Now clearly, we're talking
about digital IDs and digital money. Now that's
a really important point that needs to be
seen in this, and I'll make that more
than once.
The great reset, the digital overlap, all the
things we've worried about, that is core to
this idea.
Surveillance, biometric, digital IDs, digital money,
All of it.
So if you think you're fighting that, then
and you're and you're supporting what's happening,
you're actually not.
All residents would carry IDs, RFID.
All all are genotyped and iris scanned.
Publix places and transportations
transportation systems track everyone.
Security cameras are ubiquitous.
Every car knows where it is and who
is sitting in it and tells the authorities
both. This is the this is what conservatives
are supporting?
You see, the reality is most of them
don't know this is what they're supporting. That's
what the crazy part is.
Vance has not advocated for realms yet, but
some now argue I actually argue that's different,
that this has been 2024. I've seen many
examples of him floating very similar ideas.
But it says, but some of his most
extreme ideas echo Yarvin.
I, quote, I tend to think that we
should seize the institutions of the left
and turn them in against the left. That's
what he said. Now, yes, if you're of
the mind that anything left is bad and
anything right is good, you know, that childish
mindset, then then maybe you think that's okay.
But you realize it's not because they broke
the law or because they're doing something wrong
or they're stealing money. It's just because they're
the left.
And isn't that worth seeing in some cases?
Seizing institutions that, you know, it's and but
not stopping them. Just revamping in the direction
they wanna go in. USAID, for example.
Now it says he predicted Trump would run
again and win.
So did I. So did a lot of
people because I think it was pretty clear.
But he says then offered some and I
that was my opinion. Who didn't know for
sure.
Then he offered some advice. Quote, I think
that what Trump should do,
if I was given him one piece of
advice, Yarvin says, fire every single mid level
bureaucrat, every civil surgeon in the administrative state,
replace them with our people.
Now does that mean Republicans?
People on their side, or does it mean
people supporting the technocratic change? Does it mean
insider Silicon Valley? You know, that's what I
think that means. He added that Trump should
defy any courtroom orders and that tried to
halt the partisan partisan purge of the civil
service, which is what they did in our
doing.
It's just very, very transparent to me, and
it only gets worse.
Now first, to reference some of the points
that we made there,
here's Marc Andreessen. Now he made similar points
on the Joe Rogan show, by the way.
But here is the point where he makes
the argument that democracy is bad and fake
and, you know, the the problem, which again,
whether you agree with that or not, I'm
not a fan of mob rule, but ultimately,
that oligarchs are what are gonna save us.
Now I don't believe that's Republicans
think. You said that,
we always end up being ruled by the
elites of some kind.
Can you explain this law, this idea?
So this comes from a Italian political philosopher
from about a hundred years ago named Robert.
I'm gonna mangle the I'll let you pronounce
the Italian,
Michels,
or or Michael's.
And then it was I learned about it
through a a famous book on on politics,
probably the best book on politics written in
the twentieth century called the Machiavellians
by this guy, James Burnham,
who has had a big impact on me.
But, in the Machiavellians, he resurrects what he
calls the the sort of Italian realist school
of of political philosophy from the from the
tens and twenties. And these were people, to
be clear, this was not like a Mussolini
thing. These were people who were trying to
understand the actual mechanics of how politics actually
works.
So to get to the actual sort of
mechanical
substance of like how the political machine operates
and,
this guy, Michels, had this concept he he
ended up with called the iron law of
oligarchy.
And so what the iron law of oligarchy
and I mean, take a step back to
say what he meant by oligarchy because it
has multiple meanings. So basically, in classic political
theory, there's basically three forms of government at
core.
There's democracy,
which is rule of the many. There's oligarchy,
which is rule of the few. And there's
monarchy, which is rule of the one. Just
a mechanical observation without even saying which one's
good or bad, just a structural observation.
And so the question that Michelle's asked was,
like, is there such a thing as democracy?
Like, is there actually such a thing as
democracy? Is is there ever actually, like, direct
direct government?
Which, by the way, is a fair question.
It's a valid point to investigate, to ask.
Right? But it's not about whether or not
we should dissect the, you know, the governing
structure or decide that we don't need one.
It's about the argument of what needs to
happen to put us in the place that
they claim is gonna make us happy and
safe, and we owe nothing and be happy.
And what he did was he mounted this
sort of incredible historical, exploration of whether democracies
had ever existed in the world. And the
answer basically is almost never, and we could
talk about that. But the other thing he
did was he he sought out the most
democratic,
private organization in the world that he could
find at that point, which he concluded was
some basically communist German auto workers union
that was, like, wholly devoted to the workers
of the world uniting, you know, back when
that was, like, the hot thing.
And he went in there and he's like,
okay. This is the organization out of all
organizations on planet Earth that must be operating
as a as a as a direct democracy.
And he went in there and he's like,
oh, nope. There's a leadership class. You know,
there's, like, six guys at the top and
they control everything.
See, what's interesting about that and in no
way am I ever advocating again, my point's
always government is the problem. Whatever form I
think that's the problem, to make that clear.
For those that wanna try to argue that
any, you know, nuance point about something they
don't like means you support it, you understand
in history why that makes sense. Whether or
not it was, you know, organically created for
that very purpose or not, the point is
that you have people who are being ruled
by all absolute power dictators or authoritarians,
and they recognize, look. We have the power
if we collect and we recognize that we
are the workforce they need, and we can
use that to our advantage.
Right? You get where that comes from. The
point is that the same thing I've always
made or point I've made, any form of
government will eventually collect power at the top.
Like he's pointing out, it's not unique to
socialism versus democracy. It's just government, guys. We're
watching it take place now. So the idea
that he's basically saying without you know, that's
not what he wants you to think about
it, but it's just let's just skip to
the let's cut to the chase. Right? Just
give us the power, and we'll pretend we'll
because we're the right people. It's the same
broken logic about Trump. Well, he's the he's
the good guy, so it's okay he's doing
the wrong thing. Maybe.
Now I disagree with you, but how long
until that changes? Right? You give absolute power.
No one's given it back just like ever
in history. So I just think it's just
so frustrating that people can't see through that.
And then they leave the rest of the
membership along, you know, by the nose, which
is, of course, the story of every union.
The story of every union is always the
story of, you know, there's there's a Jimmy
Hoffa in there, you know, kinda running the
thing. You know, we just saw that with
the dock workers union. Right? Like,
you know, there's a guy.
And he's in charge. And by the way,
the number two is his son. Right? Like,
that's not like a, you know, an accident.
Right? Yeah. And it's no different than just
about any other government I've ever seen in
my life. I mean, look at what we're
seeing in our country or The UK. Nepotism
everywhere. Right? It's just it's the same thing.
Right? And so I'm may maybe he argues
that. My point is just to simply stand
back and recognize that all of it is
like that. So that's why I'm always driving
towards something without government. But, again, we're still
seem to be far away from that understanding.
But it's about what he is insinuating, arguing,
and what he's written about. Karp included, all
of them. They want you to believe that
we need a centralized, controlling power with the
right mindset.
So the Aaron Law of Oligarchy basically says
democracy is fake. There's always a ruling class.
There's always a ruling elite structurally. And he
said the reason for that is because the
masses can't organize. Right? Right. Because you're stupid.
You can't do it for yourself. Now if
that's possible if that's the reality and masses
just can't organize, then explain to me how
anybody ever has anywhere. How do you guys
organize?
It just seems like a flat a completely
invalid argument.
It's it's about selling you on that we're
inept.
At, you know, society by and large can't
capable is not capable of doing it. We
need our betters to do it for us.
That's what this stems to. It is an
elitist mindset.
What's the fundamental problem that whether the mass
is 25,000 people in union or 250,000,000
people in a country, the masses can't organize.
The majority cannot organize. Only a minority can
organize.
And to be effective in politics, you must
organize.
And I I don't necessarily agree with that.
But the point is that, okay, you could
take the the point at face value and
say that
a large group is far more difficult to
manage if not impossible. That's fair.
But why is the immediate,
you know, the mindset here to just go
to an elitist controlling structure? It doesn't have
to be a small you can like, my
point in general is that if people we
had a great conversation about this on FindPoints
about the the reality of people wanted to
secede from this country. Right? If a state
wants to leave, then they should be able
to. And then the point was, well, it's
gonna keep happening. Okay. Fine then. Good. Then
everybody breaks. So if that's the reality, the
point though is that it's not some isolated
three group, 10 group. It's about the state
itself.
Yeah. Maybe that's still difficult. But far, then
if you you can see this reducing down
to a group of people that's not some
inner small circle, it still may be able
to do I I believe that that's possible.
Whether from a national level or a smaller
state, I do believe that. I think there's
historical examples of similar things. I've talked about
this many times.
Don't be I mean, look. Consider what he's
saying. Like, you should consider anybody.
Listen to it. Consider it. But don't fall
for this idea that we're somehow incapable of
doing what they know how to do. I
don't believe that. And therefore, every political structure
in human history has been some form of
a small organized elite ruling, a large and
dispersed majority.
Every single one.
Which by the way is what most of
us point out, but not because that's how
it has to be, but because that's the
conspiracy,
even though it's not. The Greeks and the
Florentine
Theory anyway. Conspiracy theory. Had brief experiments in
direct democracy, and they were total disasters.
In Florence, I forget the name of it.
It was called, like, the workers' revolt or
something like that. There was, like, a two
year period,
where they basically experimented with direct democracy during
the renaissance, and it was a complete disaster.
And they never tried it again. Now let
me ask you something. Is that because it
wasn't possible or they didn't do it right?
Or because there are people like him that
are stepping in there trying to seize power
and manipulate?
Now, yeah, maybe that's exactly why it's not
possible. But, yeah, it it important to think
about why these things happen.
I I don't believe it's because we're just
not capable of that. I refuse to believe
that. In the state of California,
we have our own experiment on this, which
is the proposition system, which is an overlay
on top of the legislature and it you
know, anybody who looks I think you get
the general point. It goes on for a
couple more minutes.
Another example,
as I pointed out before, Larry Ellison. As
we just read from the article about AI
enforcement and surveillance to make sure everyone's on
their best behavior, well, yep. Larry Ellison was
already selling you on that before we got
here because they all seem to be individually
sort of driving society in this direction. Here's
what he said. You probably saw this I
think I played it yesterday. This will be
on their best behavior
because we rec we're we're constantly recording watching
and recording everything that's going on.
Citizens will be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on.
And it's
In case you're just tuning in, the point
being that people like him, including him, and
and Andreessen and Karp and all of them,
are the ones funding and driving this direction.
So that matters when they're laying out for
you the world they want to build.
Right? So is that the freedom city you
envision with digital IDs and biometric scans and
drones watching everything? Is that what you think
you're watching? Is that what you think you're
fighting for?
It's unimpeachable. The the cars
the cars have camera, you know, cam cameras
on them. Alright. We we have I think
we have a squad car here someplace.
But those kind of applications using
AI if we can use AI and we're
using AI to monitor the video. So if
that altercation had occurred that occurred in Memphis,
the chief of police would be immediately notified.
It's not people that are looking at those
cameras. It's AI that's looking at the camera.
No. No. No. You can't do this. It
would be like a shooting. That's gonna be
immediately that's gonna be an an event that's
immediately
rip an alarm is gonna go off. It's
gonna be and, we're gonna we're gonna
have supervision. And there was every police officer
is gonna be supervised
at
all times.
And the and the supervision will and and
if there's a problem,
AI will report the problem and report it
to the appropriate for, person, whether it's the
sheriff or the chief or whom whomever.
We need to,
take control of the situation. Okay. So let's
hypothetically discuss this future in which you have
these technocrat feudal lords that are basically CEOs
of their little realm as they call it.
Right? And so the AI sees a problem
and reports it back to their feudal lord
who has the all seeing control over everything,
and it turns out that it's his son.
Right? Hope it's Barron Trump. Hope it's Larry
Ellison's family.
What do you think they do? Right? Do
you think they go, well, we have to
uphold the law, or do they go, well,
it's my family, and I don't care. I'm
in control.
Really? I mean, you can easily piece together
how, this is I mean, most people, even
people with principle would probably do the same.
That's that's the way people operate. Your family
is important to you. My point is simply
to highlight that's why you can't have that
kind of individual, you know, isolated centralized power
at the top because they will eventually rule
in their own favor. They will and then
very, very quickly, that turns into just a
king who doesn't care about you at all,
which is, by the way, pretty much what
it already seems to be. But you must
understand that that's what they're painting for you
right now. We're just supposed to believe that
these people have your best interest at heart?
It's quite a gamble, especially when you can
prove it's not true. We have, you know,
same thing with we have drones. We just,
if there's something going on in a shopping
and I'll stop, a drone goes out there,
it get there way faster than a police
car.
There's no reason for, by the way, high
speed chases. You shouldn't have high speed chases
between cars.
You just have a drone follow the car.
I mean, it's very very simple.
Yeah. This is the guy rolling out the
the Stargate platform with Trump, right, along with
SoftBank, along with Sam Altman, all of which
are intertwined with this whole story, Altman included,
by the way.
So you we just played this one. I
just think it's important to include in this
conversation. Here's Peter Thiel as we show hopefully,
this plays correctly like it did yesterday. But
just that quick clip again about him in
the interview, but also the joke around it,
of him saying, you know, whether human species
should continue. I think it's very relevant to
this overlap because transhumanism,
the technocracy part, it's very much a part
of this. And what he's saying in here
is pretty alarming, and it overlaps with this
same kind of technocratic, feudal mindset.
Peter, you've been doing great so far. Just
some layup questions ahead, and let's bring this
home. You I think you would you would
prefer the human race to endure. Right?
No way. You're hesitant. Well, I yes? I
don't know. I I would
Yeah. Yes. The the answer is yes. This
is a long hesitation. There's so many It's
so many long hesitation. There's so many questions
and questions. Should the human race survive?
Yes. The the only answer is yes. Yes.
Great. But Fuck. I also would like us
to to radically solve these problems. And, and
so, you know What what what what is
he talk what is he talking about? Yeah.
Transhumanism.
Human natural body gets transformed into an immortal
body.
And,
there's a critique of, let's say, the trans
people in a sexual context or, I don't
know, transvestite
is someone who changes their clothes and cross
dresses. We want more than cross dressing or
changing your sex organs. We want you to
be able to change your heart
and change your mind, your whole body, and
then orthodox Christian
Isn't that interesting? Right? In this context is
at more as we go forward. The idea
that he's lit this is the guy, you
know, the YARVIN circle of influence.
And that's what his mindset is.
You know, it's it's transhumanism
is not a secret distant part of this.
It's right in it's very much involved. You
And one a couple more overlaps before we
get into the next section of this. Let's
let's not forget Vivek who kind of exited
stage left, but is still very much part
of this. During the the pandemic
or whatever you wanna call what happened, Vivek
pitched policymakers
on a dystopian national surveillance system that would,
in his words,
segregate people based on biomarkers.
Right? Now this this is Eric saying, Vivek
Ramaswamy leads Ohio governor's race by eight points.
So maybe they just distant they, you know,
broke ways or maybe they rec decided that
he'd be more valuable running this state. Who
knows? The bottom line is he's just as
much a part of this as everybody else.
All of this lines up with the mindset
of what they're building, and it's all about
the cities, the technocratic states that they're talking
about.
Right? The the prosper version, the freedom sitting
in this country. That's what this is about.
And all of this I mean, just wait
until we get to the next part. Now,
as I was telling you, the kind of
experimentation that's happening,
it's overwhelming. But here, just a quick clip.
You can hear him say it himself. Tolerate
a national system
in which
certain people on the basis of a biomarker
are segregated
to say you can't go back to normal
life where certain people get a head start.
Is that an inequity we would tolerate?
I personally think that it is better than
the status quo. If we can send ten
or twenty percent of the people back on
the basis of having immunity that's proven on
the basis of a lab based result that's
now Now what's interesting is, of course, this
comes at the angle of, like, well, we
are being told we don't have it because,
you know, that's like the COVID time. This
is how they use these things.
And so, yes, it's of course, it it
fits in. It's a solution for you. Right?
To, you know, to get your blood, you
get your samples taken, and check for biomarkers,
and we'll prove you've got immunity, but a
hell of a lot more than that. And
then maybe segregate you based on those things,
but maybe based on something entirely different than
about whether you got COVID
or whatever. He was just
it's just so shocking how these people were
framed as something
I mean, what they are, I think, is
quite obvious.
So here's an article that I think just
end this ending this point about Curtis Yarvin
that I think adds to this Whole Digger
picture. Elon Musk consulted Curtis Yarvin,
right wing thinker on his third party,
which, by the way, seems to have sort
of petered out for now, but I get
the sense it's not going anywhere.
But it just shows you how immersed this
all is, guys. Everyone is tapping into this
direction.
Now
Prospera
is an important part of this. Now 2017
is when this really started.
It is funded by people like
by by specifically Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen,
and even Sam Altman. And this there it
all overlaps with this, and you you know
what I think. It's what we just discussed.
It'll be more clear as we finish out
this part.
But what I wanna include in this is
so we just talked about the DC overlap
with kinda the philosophy behind what this is
before we even get in to what these
freedom cities look like. But here, in 2017,
I covered this in 2024,
is an important overlap to this. And I
think what it was, along with a few
of these that I've said before, is like
a trial balloon. It's a test to see
as by the way, what they they call
it a test. I'll read for you directly
from their own statements. This is a test.
As even Trump pointed out, the DC was
a test.
As they're not supposed to say that, but
that's all a test. Now you could argue
a test to see how this would work
elsewhere, or maybe not. But even that seems
like a little bit of a two, you
know, a statement they maybe didn't wanna put
out. Because it wasn't supposed to be a
test. We were told it was just one
one thing. We're getting rid of all the
crime. Now it turns out it was a
test to see. Right?
I think we get the sense there's something
much bigger happening here. But this story is
important.
They're all involved with the funding, which I'll
prove to you more in a second if
you haven't seen it already, of this location.
Now the simple reality is I'll I'll probably
read some of this redundantly on the article
we get to. But the reality is simply
that they manipulated the situation.
02/2009,
illegal coup from The United States overthrew the
country of Honduras.
Very easy to look up.
Okay. So then
there was an opening.
Power people people were put in place, but
the supreme the court still existed that was
different from that power control. And, ultimately, they
then tried to take this special autonomous zone
for themselves.
Now when they tried, of course, they were
trying to designate as a special the ZD
or, you know, the autonomous zone. And the
court said no, which I think we do
read as I'll read in a second. And
what they do, well, they got they removed
the judges, put people they liked in place,
then they got the designation, all of which
is illegal. Right? The whole thing. Then, of
course, they jumped forward, and they then people
in power in Honduras then said, we don't
want you here anymore and revoked that status,
and they didn't care.
Instead, they sued them for basically a third
of the entire GDP of Honduras, which I've
always pointed out. When that potentially resolves, if
they win, which people think they will, the
New York Times said they're probably gonna win.
What does it look like when Prospera owns
a vast portion, a controlling section of the
resources and assets of the government? Do they
effectively become the governing power? It seems that
way to me. So then you have Honduras'
government as sort of like this flimsy stand
in who doesn't even really have control.
That's the transition of power. But, overall, the
point is that right now, even the leader
of Honduras claims the US government's trying to
regime change them again. Maybe for something else,
maybe to make this stick. I don't know.
You can decide for yourself. But watch this
show. This is important to understand. The technocratic
regime change under the guise of freedom, technocrats
are slowly taking control. That was September 2024.
Important show to watch, but let's go further.
First, there's the the Pronomos capital
is a very central part of this, and
this is the this is Peter Thiel. It's
Andreessen. It's car they're all this is like
the funding arm, at least one part of
it. You got the founders fund. You've got
a few of these different mechanisms they use.
But this one, as far as I can
tell, seems to be the one they that
is tied to all the Freedom City stuff,
all of the Prospera stuff, all the points
we're making. It all seems to tie back
to Pronomos Capital, which is then Peter Thiel
and all the rest. Same point.
Oh, this is their which, by the way,
3,000 followers.
No. That's not the it's I mean, here's
what this tells me just very simply.
They have a hell of a lot of
influence and power. If they wanted to be
known and and acknowledged,
they would be. But the fact that they've
got 30 or 3,000 followers and that people
won't even need to seem to know the
name says that they don't want to be
seen.
At the very least, not yet. And I
think that speaks volumes. Do you know what
I'm saying? Like, if they wanted this to
be the big peronemus capital that everyone talks
about, then this then this you know, easy
that would be for them to throw it
in the limelight.
And all the politicians would follow it and
everybody would talk about it, but no. It's,
I think, for a reason, boxed out. Now
here's the r he's the,
alright. It's on the contact page for some
reason. Here's the
page of the Perdomo Perdomos Capital. You can
check out for yourself. Better laws, better lives.
Now here's what Grok had to say about
what is the current reality of Prospera and
Honduras. I just wanna I've all told you
all this already, but I wanted just to
show you this quick breakdown from Grok, from
a right leaning, controlled, manipulated AI that ultimately
shows you that even at the surface level,
these things are very important. They're on the
surface. I get pushback from these statements from
people that I I've I've talked about this
in many different circles, and these points are
very clearly provable. And yet I get pushback
from people when I bring it up in
certain circles.
Legal challenges to what's going on. Now what
this top part is just describing the rollout
like I just said. Semi autonomous private city
oh, I didn't say this before. This is
in the original show, though. The Roatan Island
is where the main location is,
and it's operating as what they call a
zone for employment and economic
deployment, ZD, or a special autonomous
zone, which I often point out is a
section right out of the sustainable development goals.
I think that obviously overlaps to this. But
it says backing from Peter Thiel, Andreesen
from Pernomos Capital.
So the point is it goes on to
list the population, different things. I wanna highlight
on the legal challenges. In 2022,
president
Xiomara
Castro's administration
repealed
the Zede law like I just told you,
deeming it unconstitutional
because it flatly is.
In September 2024, the Honduras Supreme Court ruled
Zidi's retroactively
unconstitutional,
threatening their legal foundation. I didn't mean threatening.
It's legally not even allowed to be there
anymore,
and they don't care. Think about how crazy
that is.
Honduras Prospera Inc filed a $10,800,000,000
lawsuit
against Honduras in in the World Bank's arbitration
tribunal.
Perfect.
Claiming lost future returns. Think about how crazy
that is. You do this illegally, and then
you somehow because of how powerful you are,
you could just sue them for billions of
dollars going through the World Bank
and claim that you're losing returns from an
illegal venture that you put into place illegally?
In what world in their world, does that
make sense? This amount is roughly a third
of Honduras' GDP.
Local resistance, particularly from
the Garifuna
community in Crawfish Rock, which I've mentioned many
times, cites environmental damage, which I haven't even
talked about, by the way. That but for
me, it's more about the encroachment and and
land grab, but apparently, environmental damage too.
Disrupted water supplies, flooding. Doesn't that sound familiar?
Like every other AI data center that we're
seeing today? And it says, and lack of
consultation.
Community leaders like Vanessa Cardenas and Louisa
Connor have there been vocal critics.
Meaning that and the point was that Crawfish
Rock is the one of the places arguing
that they're being, like, absorbed into this. So
if this is some kind of an allowed
area, then why are they expanding? Why are
they absorbing more territory? This it this is
it's because it's not what it sounds like.
In October 2024,
Roatan's mayor, Ron McNabb,
ordered a temporary closure of Prospera's offices for
unpaid municipal taxes
of $478,000
rejecting its claim of sovereignty.
Right? There there's a mayor
of an island that there are like, it
just see, what does that mean? So is
he not really in charge? Is he just
a basically a stand in? Like, this is
a transition.
Now they're trying to push back. So they're
claiming we have sovereignty, but, of course, they
set it up illegally. And the idea is
that they owe them half a million dollars
anyway. And it goes on to say, critics,
including locals
and 85
global economists view Prospera as a form of
neocolonialism,
exploiting land and resources while bypassing Honduran laws.
Unregulated
medical trials is so important to me right
now.
There I mean, this is very clear. I'll
show you some examples. Mini Circle, I think,
was one company, bioengineering.
They're unregulated
medical trials, and god knows what else is
happening,
including gene editing at facilities like oh, there
it is. MiniCircle
have sparked investigations
by Honduras' Ministry of Health in 2024.
They're doing unregulated
medical experimentation
using genetics,
gene editing, bioengineering. This that's terrifying. Now and
what what do you think The US is
doing there? I guarantee you there are other
governments involved that are doing all sorts of
things, so there's nobody watching.
The project's ties to former president Juan Orlando
Hernandez, now imprisoned in The United States
for drug trafficking,
have fueled accusations of being a narco regime.
You realize, Prospera
has ties to somebody the US government has
in jail for drug trafficking.
I I I I cover all this in
that first show. It hosts events like biotech
summits and promotes itself as a model for
global network states.
That's the point, guys. So you'll see these
intersection points of Curtis Yarvin's patchwork states, the
network states, the start up Citi point, the
Israel overlap. It's all the same language. It's
the same idea.
Prospera remains operational but is embroiled in legal,
political, and social conflicts. Its future hinges on
the outcome of the arbitration lawsuits and Honduras'
ability to enforce its laws.
That seems pretty important to me. Now
this is one we've read before, but just
to include it for for even foreign policy.
How we start up utopia became a nightmare
for Honduras.
It's not a utopia. Now the startup thing
is interesting, of course, as from the wired
article as well, startup city, because of the
whole startup nation thing, which is by the
way, what they also used before they changed
the title, which is usually referenced Israel.
Right? The whole that's that's their whole unit
8,200 startup where they they were populating businesses.
We're not gonna get into that more today.
The point, though, is that this is the
same model.
Here is,
The Times of India. Prospera,
a start up city in Honduras with investments
by Peter Thiel, Sam Altman. It's pretty easy
to see all of this overlaps. Now where
this gets most concerning to me with considering
Washington DC point is where this then intersects
with the Freedom City point, which I've already
said many times, but to see it, to
understand that this Prospera
alarming reality
is it it is completely on the surface
connected with the Freedom City rollout. And they
even mention it as an example of what
they wanna do.
Now I didn't know exactly that when I
covered this in 2024, but I was exactly
right based on what I saw in the
information.
Brett, watch it for yourself. That's what it
looks like to be actually correct, not throwing
out 75 different things and getting one of
them right, then only pointing to that one
when you look back.
The reality was
it was pretty clear to see that this
was going in that direction. But I at
the time, I said, this is my opinion,
but we can now see that.
Now this is from the New York Times
or excuse me, the New York Time oh,
it is New York Times Magazine. The for
profit city that might come crashing down. This
is from 2024.
The Honduran government wants it gone.
It says Prospera has become particularly well known
for the zone's experimental
medical facilities.
I I just think that's so incredible to
me with what we just went through. And,
you know, and and, like, remember Donald Trump?
I mean, I how much you wanna bet,
by the way? And this just popped into
my head. That with the supposedly no more
gain of function
executive order, which actually outlined that they'd be
the leaders in the world of the kinds
that they support,
how much you wanna bet that's happening in
these locations?
Where I mean, in most cases, they're, you
know, they're there's critics there's people that want
that to stop entirely, which they pretend they
want, but they don't.
And even in The United States or other
places, they've done it. There are still restrictions,
but not in places like this.
But it says the week of my visit,
the the author, Patry Friedman, grandson of the
economist Milton Friedman, and the founder of a
startup, Cities Fund, that invested in Prospera,
had a chip with his Tesla key implanted
in his hand.
On a previous trip, he brushed his teeth
with genetically modified bacteria purported to prevent cavities.
Another time, he was injected with a protein
booster intended to make him stronger and faster
as he put it at a at a
conference in the Roatan that weekend.
These are the people this is what they're
doing, guys. This is the horror I mean,
look. You may not think that matters since
it's them doing it, but what happens if
they're talking about something like self spreading technology
or self amplifying in in tech or self
amplifying injections or any number of things we've
talked about or nanotechnology?
What happens if something then becomes something they
can't contain? What if they make a mistake?
That's crazy.
Especially since in a lot of ways, even
your tax dollars are ending up in their
pockets. It's terrifying to me.
It says, in promotional mute materials,
Prospera markets itself to the twenty first century
pioneers. Right. Isn't that what Trump was saying?
The the new, you know, the the,
manifest destiny in The United States revamping the
pioneer spirit. You know, it's the same point.
It's the same mindset, ideology, framing.
Prospera's original investment plan projected that by 2030
what an interesting way to aim. Why would
they aim at 2030?
Who
knows? The city would be home to 38,000
residents, and that foreign direct investment in the
country would top $500,000,000.
Now I don't actually think it's connected, but
it's an interesting number. Seeing as how they're
pulling $500,000,000
over here and then, you know, it's like,
I but I just interesting overlap.
I mean, that money, I think, is actually
going on to self amplifying shots for the
whole vaccine direction in regard to RFK. My
point, though, is that in '20 by 2030,
they'd have this and by foreign direct investment.
So who else is investing in Prospera that
we don't get to see? Probably or not.
Israel, for sure. Probably places like the desk
you know, dep the the authoritarian states of
the world, which clearly are the leading allies
of the current of the West regime right
now. But it says several others are under
development, including the East Solano plan,
run by a real estate corporation that has
spent the last seven years buying up $900,000,000
of ranch land in the East Bay to
build a privatized alternative to San Francisco
called Praxis. Now isn't it funny how the
right will criticize, rightly so, Bill Gates buying
up all the farmland,
China bought yes. Those things should matter. But
why doesn't it matter when the techno fascists
do it from the conservative side?
Because we don't talk about it.
It's been going on a long time. I'm
willing to bet you pointing at Gates was
sort of a way to stop you from
seeing things like this, but both should matter.
I mean, we talked about the farmland right
now being destroyed because of what they're doing
with immigration. It seems like they're all going
in the same direction with different justifications.
But
another example,
a freedom city
called Praxis, a forthcoming what they call crypto
state on the Mediterranean. Now this is the
same conversation.
In fact, it even turns out it's funded
by Peter Thiel. A startup linked to Peter
Thiel wants to build the next great city
in Greenland. Funded to a tune of $525,000,000,
Praxis aims to revitalize Western civilization.
Isn't that funny?
Totally separate thing, I guess, even though it's
clearly not.
You're seeing this all over the world.
And I think you're right now watching it
begin in this country.
They are doing this. It's not a secret.
They're literally building some of these autonomous areas
that are basically through strong-arm tactics, forcing places
to give up area and taking control of
it, or in some cases, trying and failing.
It it says, and and the Free Republic
Of Liberland,
a three square mile stretch of unclaimed flood
plain between Serbia and Croatia that guess what?
They're also funding Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen. Yeah.
All the same people. It's almost like they're
doing the same thing all over the world
because they are. Many of the same ideological
aligned names, Balaji,
Srini Vasan, Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, Friedman
recur as financial backers. Patrick
Schumacher, principal of the Ada Hadid Architects and
a critic of public housing, is behind several
of their urban or metaversal designs.
Srinivasan,
the former Coinbase chief technology officer who's involved,
we pointed this out before,
and now an adviser to Pronomos Capital, Friedman's
fund to build startup cities
argued in his 2022
book, The Network State. Just right just in
those two paragraphs, you can see the connection
between places like Prospera, places like Free Axie
or what is it called, Praxis,
and now the Freedom City network state conversation
because it's the same point. If you think
it's if you if you think I'm being
redundant, I am. I'm trying to drill this
idea into people's minds so we can see
what's happening.
And it says these new business friendly hubs
would soon compete with nation states and one
day replace them. Network state was inspired, he
said, by
the state of Israel.
That's not a joke. It even says, what
I'm really calling for is something like tech
Zionism. When a community forms online and then
gathers in physical space to form a reverse
dispor diaspora.
Literally saying that this conversation, the network state,
the idea of the freedom cities, Prospera, in
his mind, started or is framed inspired by
the State Of Israel.
I mean, guys, this is being written at
a time when the genocide is in full
swing. Imagine even pointing to something like that.
And on top of that, that he literally
says he's calling for what he frames as
tech Zionism.
If you think this is just me inserting
this, guys, I didn't expect that to be
in the article. I'm looking at this from
the point of freedom cities overlaps, and I
just almost fell out of my chair. It's
obvious because you know I pointed out that
Israel is a central
player in what this
is. Goes on to say, a tumultuous
tumultuous three years followed.
Romer and the oversight board he helped set
up were sidelined,
and this is back to hunt the Prospera,
sidelined and the Honduras Supreme Court, this is
what I've been telling you, initially rejected the
constitutional amendment. They needed an amendment
to allow the special zone. So first, they
pushed an amendment that nobody wanted, then that
then the Supreme Court
rejected that, but congress, led by Hernandez, dismissed
the four opposing judges.
It's this is the New York Times. Not
like that makes it true, but you can
prove this. They literally just removed the judges
who ruled against them. What's funny is I
say these things in passing, and I feel
like people act like I'm being hyperbolic.
I am rarely being hyperbolic, guys. It's very
clear what happened. And the point is the
congress they they dismissed four of the judges
that were opposing what they wanted in what
some called a technical coup.
Hernandez, who succeeded Lobo as president of Honduras,
continued to have a career marred by corruption
and was recently sentenced to forty five years
in The United States for drug trafficking. Right?
So the guy who literally allowed this to
take place is currently in prison in The
United States. Think about how ridiculous that is.
In 2013,
Honduras amended its constitution
to allow for the creation of autonomous zones
because of what they did. They've they've literally
forced this in using criminals who are currently
in prison in The United States.
Now it says Prospera has now incorporated 222
businesses into the autonomous zone, the ZD, including
an outsourced staffing agency and scores of experimental
medical centers.
MiniCircle,
founded by two young biohackers, offers a product
that they say might cure Alzheimer's and suppress
all tumors or, you know, give you myocarditis
and kill you all, but, you know, we'll
find out. Lamboyant Labs manufactures implants that turn
people into self sovereign cyborgs.
Not a joke. The Bay Islands Fitness and
Transformation Center, these are all in Prospera,
offers affordable,
semaglutin
injections, and the Global Alliance for Regenerative Medicine
provides stem stem cell treatments.
A man sitting next to me on my
light from Roatan showed me severe burns on
his arm that he'd come to treat at
the clinic. While I was visiting, a pop
up city called Vitalia used a dome it
had erected on Prospera's grounds to host events
for biotech innovators who want to take death
who want to, quote, make death optional.
This is a wet dream for technocrats and
transhumanist guys. They're literally doing anything they can
that they can't do anywhere else, it seems.
But look. Maybe,
just like with Neuralink.
Maybe this guy has a burn, goes there
and gets, you know, treatment he can't get
anywhere else. I can understand how that's clearly
an overlap to this. And maybe that's even
what they're really trying to accomplish. But you
must, by now, be able to see, especially
with the ideology I just painted for you
of the people doing this, that this is
not in the best interest of any of
the things we're talking about.
Or at the very least, I hope you
can consider that because I think it's pretty
obvious.
So lastly here is the overlap to the
the many different examples. We I mean, we've
pretty much paid to the picture, but here's
Wired again. Startup
city. Groups say they are meeting Trump officials
to push for deregulated Freedom City. So the
point to see this, the trend the timing
is the way I'm plant
presenting this. Right? The DC thing we clearly
see is happening. Right? We went to the
Prospera point. Now what we're seeing is and
this is the article is
where's the date again? Twenty March twenty twenty
five. Right? So March,
you had the Andreessen's, the carp, the the
the I mean, everyone we listed off. You
have these kind of people proapproaching
the White House or people in power or
people in their local states or saying, we
want this to happen. We wanna roll out
deregulated freedom cities.
It says the architects of projects like Prospera
are drafting legislation to create US cities that
would be free from federal regulations.
Several groups representing start up cities,
tech hubs exempt from the taxes and regulations
that apply to the countries where they are
located are drafting congressional
legislation
to create freedom cities in The United States
that would be similarly free from certain federal
laws, Wired has learned.
Trey Goff, the chief of staff of the
startup city known as Prospera,
tells Wired that he and other Prospera representatives
working under an advocacy group called the Freedom
Cities Coalition, remember that, have been meeting with
the Trump administration about the idea in recent
weeks. What's funny is I've been making this
point I mean, when I first talked about
this and I first saw the Freedom City,
I said that feels like the same thing,
and here we are.
The point is clearly
that they're the the people of Prospera are
modeling this or rather the Freedom City direction
on what they're doing there.
You know how much pushback I got for
simply suggesting
that? It's literally being promoted at this point.
He claims the administration has been very receptive.
In 2023,
Trump floated the idea of creating 10 Freedom
Cities. Now Goff says that Prospera's vision
is to create not just 10, but as
many as the market can handle.
That can't be any more clear. Get ready
to have Prospera freedom city or rather technocratic
hellscapes taking over our country if they get
what they want. They hope to have drafted
legislation ready by the end of the year.
Here's where Trump pointed that out in case
you forgot. Past generations of Americans
pursued big dreams and daring projects
that once seemed absolutely impossible.
They pushed across an unsettled continent
and built new cities in the wild frontier.
Oh, it was unsettled, was it?
I mean, what kind of stupid it does
it take to even say something like that?
Unsettled?
Why? Because he's a colonialist occupier just like
the rest of them we're talking about. Like,
I mean, you you understand he's very aware
that there was an entire civilization that existed
in this country. But the point is you're
not supposed to say those things. It's like
you're not supposed to acknowledge Palestinians exist. It's
just it's just insulting. And that's not some
woke point to make. It's just acknowledging the
facts.
They transformed American life with the interstate highway
system,
magnificent it was, and they launched a vast
network of satellites into orbit
all around the Earth.
But today, our country has lost its boldness.
Under my leadership, we will get it back
in a very big way if you look
at just Yeah. Maybe they will. Right? They're
sure it's all being bold. You have to
understand as always what they're saying. When they
say we, they mean them.
Three years ago, what we were doing was
unthinkable
how good it was, how great it was
for our country. Right. Because COVID nineteen was
so amazing. Right? That's the time frame.
He's but he does. He thinks that. He
said many times, the greatest thing every republican
democrat thinks the same. COVID nineteen warp speed
was the greatest thing ever. He just said
that again.
Our objective will be a quantum leap in
the American standard of living. That's what will
happen.
You feeling that so far? Here are just
a few of the ways we can do
it. Almost one third of the land mass
of The United States is owned by the
federal government. Which is a crime,
period.
The re in any situation, we're allowed to
just say unconstitutional.
The federal government is not supposed to be
owning land. But, you know, we're there's a
ton of things we could point out that
are directly contradictory to the constitution, but that
shows you how broken our government is today,
or rather just completely willfully misguided.
With just a very, very small portion of
that land, just a fraction,
one half of 1%,
would you believe that,
we should hold a contest to charter up
to 10 new cities and award them to
the best proposals
for development. And who do you think is
gonna be putting those proposals forward?
Yeah. I think I think Palantir's got one
coming. You know? It's like that's exactly what
you're gonna get. But realize,
the idea of this like, there you realize
how much land, for example, that, like, the
Bureau of Land Management controls?
I don't I I mean, that may sound
like what he's saying, and I certainly hope
if if, you know, that that if they
have to take land and they're gonna do
this, at least it'd be from somebody they're
not stealing it from. The point is that
I don't think that's what it's gonna be.
I think we're watching what it's gonna be.
But, well, I guess we'll have to wait
and see how it plays out. Like, DC
and Chicago as opposed to land that's already
taken by the government that they're not currently
using. That's what I'm talking about. I don't
think that's what it's gonna be. As always,
they frame it as what makes sense when
ultimately it's unusual. It's not usually the direction
it ends up. Like, the original narrative is
rarely what actually happens. In other words, we'll
actually build new cities in our country again.
These freedom cities will reopen the frontier,
reignite American imagination,
and give hundreds of thousands of young people
and other people,
all hardworking
families,
a new shot at homeownership.
Sure.
Do you think that's how it's gonna work
out? I hope so. At least in the
sense that there's some benefit to people whatever
happens, but the reality seems far from that
with where we currently are.
Now it says he claims the administration has
been very receptive. That and Trump floated the
idea of doing this. You just heard that.
The energy in DC is absolutely electric, Goff
says. You can tell in meetings with the
people involved that they have been they have
the mandate to do some of the more
hyperbolic, verbose things Trump has mentioned.
According to Goff, Freedom Cities Coalition has briefed
White House officials on three options,
excuse me, for Freedom Cities.
One is through interstate compacts.
In this scenario, two or more states could
set aside territories with shared tax and regulation
policies,
which with some state specific carve outs.
Under existing law, these compacts can't be revoked.
They can be dissolved under certain circumstances.
Now let me ask you this. Let's just
say this happens. Right? And then there's this
middle ground between these states. What about the
people in that area? What about the what
if those people decide they don't wanna be
a part of this anymore? Or what if
the state as a as a whole decides
we wanna break away from this whole country?
You know, my point is that this is
not we're so we don't live in that
world anymore if we ever did. The government
will never ever, any side of it, let
taxes or California secede because they need it.
It's a con it's we don't live in
the world we think we do. They want
you to think that's there just like they
want you to think that we can, you
know, remove the government if we feel it's
not doing its job as the constitution literally
states. No. No. You do that. You're a
terrorist. Right? We don't live in the world
we think we do. The idea here is
that they're trying to make it sound like
we're we, you know, do this in a
way that's gonna benefit everybody. It's not.
As we can see in the places they've
already done it. It says the two other
options are creating federal enclaves with special economic
and jurisdictional zones or having Trump issue executive
orders to create each one of the freedom
cities.
Yeah. So exactly like what we're seeing right
now, whether it's the special zones or the
emergency statements and executive orders. Well, that's where
we are.
Freedom Cities Coalition was created by an entity
called Niue Capital LLC,
which owns several trademarks for Prospera.
It's just very obvious how the overlap. Since
opening on the Honduran island of Roatan in
2020, Prospera has been attracting tech workers and
startups by promising low taxes, few regulations. I
mean, few? Why wouldn't there be none if
that's the little point? Right? And it says,
and a businesslike government that considers its citizens
to be akin to customers. Its finance its
financiers include
pro,
Purnomos Capital, a venture capital firm backed by
Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, and Coinbase, which we
already covered. Notably, the current government of Honduras
considers Prospera and its special zone atomic status
to be illegal.
Funny. You'd think that would matter. However, many
Honduran citizens opposed Prospera. The Honduran congress passed
a law in 2022 repealing the allowance of
these zones, and Prospera sued the Honduras government
shortly after. The lawsuit's currently ongoing, as reported
earlier. Donald Trump mentioned the idea of freedom
cities on the campaign trail in March 2023.
He promised that if he was elected president,
the the, he would hold a contest, as
you just heard, to pick 10 winners to
build new cities.
Trump hasn't referred to the idea since.
Right? Because that's you know, he plans that
idea.
And then, you know, they do something different.
I mean, we've seen that. It's not unique
to left and right or even Trump, but
we continue to see that right now. The
framing, the narrative, and then a complete deviation.
But the screamers will make you pretend everything's
going going plan. We're winning.
It's not just a marketing tactic. They can
they take it very literally, Goff says. So
he's this is the guy talking about. He's
the Freedom Cities Coalition
who's talking to the White House. And And
what he's telling you is, like, this is
not just marketing, guys. They take this seriously.
He says,
referring to members of Trump's team, quote, they
intend to follow through with all of the
promises they made on the campaign trail. That's
what he says.
He adds that members of these groups are
having, quote, casual conversations with people in the
White House in in addition to Republican and
Democrat members of Congress, simply to show you
that it is not partisan, guys. All of
them want the power that we're gaining from
this.
One company that stands to benefit from the
rise of Freedom cities is MiniCircle, who we've
mentioned before, a longevity biotech company focused on
developing gene therapies to extend human lifespans. The
company's seed funding came from Peter Thiel and
OpenAI Sam Altman, and it currently has offices
in Texas and in Prospera.
Many of the industries Allen says he hopes
to foster in Freedom Cities, energy, nuclear, semiconductors,
fantastic,
and defense technology
are not coincidentally
ones a lot of venture capital is going
towards as funding moves away from the SAS
digital and intent consumer brands. Why do you
think that is?
But the point being is like they're going
in a direction that goes away from what
usual venture capitals forget because
because it's not about even making money, guys.
It's about government.
I mean, look at what they just listed
off. What we're investing is energy, nuclear, semiconductors,
defense technology. Yeah. So you're a government. You
are literally a government structure. You're rolling out
a control structure. I think we can all
see that.
And it says, oh, and this is just
interesting. Wired has changed the term startup nation
and startup cities to more accurately indicate that
it's a political subdivision. The point was, this
is what it originally said, startup nation.
I think that's very telling, don't you? Because
that's what we're talking about. Right? That's what
I the point I just made. It is
a new country. That's what they're trying to
create. But that did they got pushed back
because they don't want you to know that,
I think. So they got forced to change
it.
Now last point here. Last few points.
We going back to the point of DC.
Right? Now that we've walked through it all,
thinking about what they're currently doing. On August
6, we talked about Trump and Musk both
calling to federalize
Washington DC.
So with this in mind,
let's consider this again.
This clip that again, complete rumor.
At least, you know, unverified at the very
least. This woman says that she independently heard
from many people left and right in DC
where she works that Trump was gonna hand
over DC to Peter Thiel. Now, again, when
it first came out, which was well before
it kinda made the original the the current
rounds, I didn't share it because I'm like,
it's, like, how do you verify something like
that? But as this continues to develop with
all the information we have, it's kinda hard
not to at least consider what this is
with what we just painted for you, what's
currently happening in DC and other cities, and
the the teal
kind of pro pro almost capital funding for
all of it.
I mean, if that happened tomorrow, would that
even be a shock? They just literally like,
how about they argue that, well, we're going
to
we need to maintain the safe DC we've
created. Right? So let's allow the
whatever it is, something to come in and
keep it that way. And whether that's Teal
funding or some side group or them Palantir
themselves or whatever, this is something I expect.
I hope I'm wrong as always because this
is obviously not what anybody should want. But
let's play this clip again to remember what
she said and think about how all this
ties together with this. Like, whether it is
teal or not, the idea that the DC
thing or the rest of the cities potentially
are what we just talked about today.
Politics. And I just got back from a
trip in Washington, DC. And I wanna tell
you the absolutely unhinged rumor I heard from
current and former federal workers and people on
Capitol Hill about what Donald Trump is about
to do next. Because if it's true, it
will alter the course of American history forever.
I wanna preface this by saying I'm not
a journalist. What I'm about to share with
you is just a rumor, though I did
hear it from multiple people who do not
know each other from multiple areas of the
federal government. So with all those disclaimers, I'm
gonna share this with you anyway because I
think you deserve to know. Long story short,
Donald Trump is trying to give Washington DC
to billionaire Peter Thiel. I mean that literally,
not figuratively. Like he's trying to give a
billionaire
control over the land and the people within
Washington DC. The specific rumor is that instead
of granting Washington DC statehood like its residents
have been demanding for years, he wants to
actually roll back the little bit of independence
that they already have of self government. Apparently,
he's considering turning the district into what some
call a freedom city. Proponents of freedom cities
advocate for areas and territories that are governed
and owned completely by corporations.
So essentially, corporate colonies.
So there's no federal government oversight. There's no
state government oversight. Essentially, these freedom cities are
ruled by CEO kings. So from what I'm
hearing, the Trump administration is exploring abusing DC's
existing status as a district to make it
the first freedom city and give it to
his billionaire buddy Peter Thiel. This is a
disaster for reasons I shouldn't have to elaborate
on. Obviously, that would set an incredibly dangerous
precedent. It's hugely symbolic to give the area
where the federal government runs to a billionaire.
We're really talking about a new era of
colonization
rooted in techno fascism.
And while this particular rumor is new, Trump's
association with people who lobby for the creation
of freedom cities is well known, and they
were at his inauguration. I know it sounds
farfetched, but we really should start fighting against
this now before it becomes a reality.
Agreed.
And what what's interesting is see and when
that first came out, I mean, I well,
before this video was circulating, even before when
I first saw it, this was something we
were discussing, like, this very overlap.
But it's it's really hard not to think
about how clear that seems. Now look. As
we've known in the past,
so there could be many different plans laid
out with multiple possible outcomes.
And so now because and I think this
is happening a lot right now where the
people are not buying the narratives right now.
People are pushing back on a lot of
things. And so maybe DC was the plan
or the one of the possible plans and
the people now that people are pointing to
it and highlighting it, maybe it'll be something
else. Or maybe that's not true at all.
But the ultimate point is with the information
we have, the facts in front of us,
you know this seems almost likely.
Whether DC is gonna happen or even just
the overlap of what the transition of power,
whether you think Freedom Cities are what this
is or not. We are watching a transition
of power. I just I I've this is
so very clear to me.
Now this is a couple more points on
the overlapping Freedom City, you know, the the
conversation, which is important. This is City Journal
saying in this is from, the time the
date was December 2024. In March 2023, president-elect
Donald Trump proposed building a new freedoms
10 new freedom cities to unleash American innovation.
Trump envisioned these cities as hubs to revive
American manufacturing.
It says, what makes the freedom city movement
novel is its federal government led approach to
creating deregulated new cities. Moreover, modern economies emphasized,
aglow
agglomeration.
I thought that's something else when I first
read that.
A massive collection of things.
The cluster of industries in dominant hubs like
New York finance. I think it's interesting. New
York, San Francisco, Los Angeles.
See, this is the point I was making.
Like, right now, those are the ones they're
aiming at for the claim of crime and
immigration,
but just so happened to be some of
the most important locations when it comes to
the technocratic transition.
That's what I think it really comes down
to.
And it says, a federal agency need to
take a more active role if new cities
are to arise. Such government led efforts in
urban creation have varying degrees of success.
Many fail, but those that flourish sometimes do
so spectacularly.
Two of the most prominent examples are Saint
Petersburg, Russia and and and, Shenzhen, China.
So I guess we've it's interesting to talk
about them modeling Russia and China, if that's
what the way you wanna look at it.
But it says, with backing from some Silicon
Valley's most successful investors and entrepreneurs, California forever
set out to find a new city.
The company has required more than 50,000 acres
of land about 60 miles Northeast of San
Francisco and is lobbying for a ballot initiative
to resell the land from agriculture to urban
use. So guess who funds California Forever?
Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen. So you have to
understand that this is a very common thing.
It's all the same conversation. California forever, the
billionaire back city that no one asked for.
Both Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen are involved
with California Forever, a proposed master plan community
in Solano, California. Marc Andreessen is known investor.
He put in a billion dollars.
A billion dollars. Peter Thiel involvement is less
direct but significant. He's a major figure in
the network state movement, which aligns with the
broader vision of the tech driven utopian cities
like California forever. Thiel, along with Andreessen, is
an investor in Pernomos Capital, which is the
central part in all of this.
It says, our favorite possibility
of Presidio National Park,
though much smaller than Guantanamo Bay or Lowry
Ridge, is located its location is ideal. San
Francisco is the world's tech capital despite its
many problems. The federal government can help San
Francisco unleash its full potential. Clearly, they like
this idea.
By developing Presidio
with Paris level density
and six story apartment buildings, A developed Presidio
would add a 120,000
residents, increasing San Francisco's population by 15%.
Further, given the city's,
existing talent density,
a Presidio featuring a liberalized biotechnology
regime would quickly become a world innovation leader
in this sector. America deserves a Bay Area
that can compete. Turning Presidio into a freedom
city
could be an important step in that direction.
I mean, this everywhere you look, you've got
Democrats, you've got Republicans
openly calling for what this has happened. I
mean, isn't it weird to see people like
Hillary Clinton praising Trump's direction? Like, are we
now starting to feel like a weird synergy
taking place where you've got the globalist techno
billionaires sitting at Trump's inauguration?
Guys, you know you see it. Okay? We
just gotta start being honest about all this.
Marc Andreessen's family plans to build a visionary
subdivision near the proposed California forever utopia.
They're they're they're involved in all of this
is the point.
Now I'm gonna play this clip because I
only got two more points after this because
I think it's important. You are probably seen
it, those that watch the show regularly, but
this needs to be seen in the context
of what we discussed because this is the
world they're building.
As you can look at the conversations they
have about what they want, the digital IDs,
the biometric scans, the drone
surveillance, everything.
This and that's and that's what they're discussing
when they talk about the freedom cities. I
just made that very clear, even though still
you'll get pushback from people that don't wanna
accept it without looking for themselves. This World
Economic Forum vision is exactly what they're rolling
out. And as I said, if you have
an Amazon Echo or another form of smart
device in your home, you need to watch
this.
Beyond the current dystopian surveillance,
very important to understand geofencing,
coming to a freedom city near you.
This is Aman Jabi speaking in what's called
the agenda, their vision for the future.
One man who knows the dangers only too
well is Aman Jabi,
who was at the forefront of digital development
in Silicon Valley, California
for twenty five years.
He left when he recognized the dark side
of surveillance technology,
choosing instead the peace and beauty of Montana.
He's an expert in facial recognition.
It's a technique that is used
to uniquely
identify the biometrics
of any face.
So in a device like your smartphone and
most modern smartphones in the last five or
seven years,
they have a three d camera module in
the front of the phone, which you cannot
see.
Within that module is a near infrared projector,
which projects tens of thousands of dots on
your face.
Those dots
are then distorted based on the contours
and the features of your face.
And there's a near infrared camera
then takes a picture of that distortion,
captures it, and then reverse engineers
the exact profile of your face.
In the longer term,
facial recognition will be used
to unlock your digital identity,
which is going to be a tool of
control
for the agendas that are coming down the
pipeline.
Elements of that control are already with us.
Alexa,
good morning.
Good morning.
You are never alone in your home, and
this is why. All your devices at home
and all smart appliances,
they are all connected on a wireless network.
Many of these devices will have cameras, many
will have connected on a wireless network. Many
of these devices will have cameras, many will
have microphones,
and so they are monitoring everything all the
time. Your smart appliances are communicating with the
smart meter
and sending it real time usage data.
If there's a Ring camera also in your
home, a mesh network is formed, and all
your devices are being tracked within the home,
its location, its usage, and all the data
is going to Amazon servers.
When you leave your home,
all modern vehicles are connected to the Internet,
so your automobile is being tracked all the
time. When you're going under a string of
smart LED poles and smart LED lights on
the highway and in the streets of your
towns and cities,
those form a wireless network and are tracking
your vehicle. They are tracking
all the devices on you from smartphones to
smartwatches when you're walking on the streets.
So data is being collected twenty four seven
continuously on every human being
whenever you are within these wireless networks.
And it's obviously not
good for health also because of all the
electromagnetic radiation.
In the long term, the plan is to
pretty much lock up humanity in smart cities,
which is kind of a superset of a
fifteen minute city.
They've sold all the state and local governments
and countries
that smart cities are about
sustainability and the good of the city.
But in reality, the language from the UN
and WEF and their white papers is all
inverted.
So
air monitoring is really about limiting mobility and
no car ownership,
right? Surveillance
control via led grid is why the smart
lighting is there.
Water
rationing. Noise pollution is about speech surveillance.
Traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility.
And then, of course, energy
conservation is all about
rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline.
Another concept
one should be familiar with is called geofencing,
and that's think of it as an invisible
fence around you
where you cannot go beyond a certain point,
and that'll be related to your face recognition,
digital identity, and access control. Your smart contracts,
Softbrick can turn off your digital currency beyond
a certain point from your house.
Our world has been turned into a digital
panopticon.
That means you can be monitored, analyzed,
managed, and monetized.
Surveillance
capitalists are already making billions of dollars selling
our information to big corporations
because this kind of detailed knowledge enables them
to predict and influence our behavior.
That last part is especially important.
Digital twins and all that we've talked about,
that's what it comes down to.
So a few last parts that I wanna
include in this conversation.
There's another example of a potential freedom city
that we have to mention. Now it's not
as ex as as defined,
but it has been pointed to, and there's
a couple points I wanna make. So okay.
And we're tomorrow, we're gonna be talking about
Israel.
I I put it off again today. There's
so much I wanna get to, including still
the conversation of the is is, Israeli government
entity that's directly under Netanyahu who is allowed
to leave even though he was caught in
a child sex string.
Our government allowed that. In the midst of
covering up the Epstein conversation, it's just mind
blowing. We'll talk about but plenty of more
important stories on top of that about what
they're doing. In fact, I was just looking
online. It looks like Israel is currently using
gas on Palestinians.
I just it just
overwhelming. We're gonna get to it more tomorrow.
The point is, here's an overlap of Gaza
with this conversation.
Dropsite news says Trump backs Israel launching a
full military operation to take over Gaza. You
know, the thing they kept screaming was never
even on the table, never gonna happen. You're
anti semite, but now we're taking it all
and they have to go over. Ethically cleansing
all of them because they don't deserve to
live.
Smotrich is literally saying that. But everyone ignores
it because we're all racist apparently. Dismissing pleas
from the families of Israeli captives who are
urging a deal
that ends the war.
You know why? As we keep remember in
the beginning, they kept claiming they're all they're
protesting for you to end the war. No.
They're protesting for you, Israel, to end the
war. They're literally marching through the streets with
pictures of the of dead Gaza children at
this point saying,
accept the deal and the war. And they
they invert that into somehow they're screaming at
you to release the hostages. It's just so
gross what's happening.
President Trump says, I actually think they're safer
in many ways.
You're not gonna believe what he says here.
The point is Gaza
is considered potentially one of the one of
the locations in all this conversation. Maybe Israel
starts that charge. Here's what the clip said.
Families of hostages
are the in Israel, families of hostages,
are opposed to the reoccupying of Gaza. Why
is The US Well, not all of them.
And you have to understand, I'm the one
that got all of the hostages out. You
got a lot of people out. If it
wasn't for me, they wouldn't be out. Oh
my god. I mean, guys,
it's, it almost makes me sick to my
stomach, the kind of
this narcissism. You're literally talking about
people that you had the idea that he
had anything to do with the people that
were either released or exchanged for because of
the deal they were always trying to stop
is just gross to me. But on top
of that, that you somehow make this about
you, that you're literally talking about allowing or
supporting
an ongoing genocide, ethnic cleansing occupation, continuation of
it. And when asked about those including the
families of the people you claim you're saving
that go, we don't want you to do
that. You go, well, not all of them.
And nobody be alive if we didn't do
it. We saved everybody.
Or I did. He said, I he talked
about himself personally.
I just can't even express how disgusting that
is to me. Who would these people are?
Himself
personally included in this conversation. It is so
there's just no words for it.
To make that statement in the midst of
this is just beyond the pale.
The idea, though, is him somehow claiming that
he saved all these people.
The reality being very clearly that they've been
trying to stop this deal every single step
of the way, which, again, I won't get
into it more tomorrow. The point here
is that he's rationalizing. I want to include
it just because it's, you know, overlap tomorrow,
but also to set the table that he's
completely okay with them to remove every Palestinian
from Gaza. What do you think is gonna
go there next?
I worked with, BB and I worked with
Steve Witka,
but it wasn't for me, you would have
all these hostages would most likely be dead
right now. Oh, okay. So if it wasn't
for Trump, all the hostage will be dead?
How does that even make sense? You mean
because Israel's bombing everybody constantly? Well, that you
could argue yes.
But the argument is that you've I mean,
I I, you know, I I'll go into
it work tomorrow. Like, it really does just
spin me out. That is so insane.
It shows you that these this guy, whatever
the people wanna claim, is just as bad
as Obama and Biden and all the rest.
They're sociopaths.
They don't care about you. They don't care
about children starving. They don't care about South
Africans. They care about the agenda.
Every one of them. So
they all come up here. They all come
in groups of ten,
twelve, 13,
and many of them.
And I've gotten to know a lot of
them. They're great people. What they had to
go through is incredible. But so now they
have 20, but the 20 is actually probably
not 20 because a couple maybe aren't around
any longer. It's a it's a terrible thing.
No. I like Okay. What do you what
what do you mean by that?
So you're talking about people that have been
released, okay, that are now home.
And you're saying that they all come to
see you even though you we've just made
clear that almost I mean, literally, all of
them are supporting them ending this right now.
I mean, except maybe for a single one
that I could point to, but the p
the hostages are the ones who've told you
they were treated kindly, they were fed, that
they they sheltered them with their own bodies
because Israel was bombing them. That's what they
were most afraid of. I mean, to a
person, guys. And they say they want you
to stop. And he goes, no. It's not
all of them. But then he goes on
to reference all of them and says that
some of them may not be around anymore.
What are you suggesting right there?
They didn't that are you are you clumsily
trying to suggest that Hamas killed them somehow
even though they were already released? That's probably
what happened right there, to be honest. That's
how we that's how he's my he just
is narrative clumsy all the time. But, Ory,
are you suggesting they got killed by Israel?
Or are you suggesting they took their own
lives because of what Israel made them do?
It's a very weird thing to say right
there.
I I don't like anymore. I said, you
know, when you get down to 20,
they're not gonna make deals anymore. And they
did. And then I put out a statement
as you know. There was a tough statement.
Go in and get them. And they said,
we'll give you 10. We'll give you 10.
I don't know what Israel's doing, but they
were willing now immediately to give us another
10. Hey. You see, guys, I mean, I'm
so so tired of this. He's lying. K?
He's lying. Looking to anybody, Jeremy Skatehill, or
anybody who's constantly covering this, you are you
are you pretending right now that look. It's
the same point I made earlier. The women
in the red hats go, please, Trump. Please
come into Chicago. Just like the leaders of
the world said, please, Trump, make a deal
with me. Are you to believe now that
those Hamas was going, please, Trump. We'll give
you 10, please.
Because you could literally prove that's not true.
Doesn't it I mean, think about
how horrendously
disgusting it is to not only make yourself
the story about people you're killing, but also
to somehow,
you know, turn this into
somehow a benefit. I mean, I just I
can't.
I'm speechless. I really am. Like, what he's
doing here is so far over the top
to me. Now immediately to give us another
TED. That ultimately, you're claiming Hamas was willing
to make a deal with you and and
that somehow it just didn't spin out. They're
going plea. But my point is lying about
that. Making up a story about somehow how
you were the one making it happen when
you know you're making that up about a
genocide.
Anyway, I'll keep I'll go on forever if
we keep watching this. I will talk about
it more tomorrow. The point is
the occupation of Gaza. Right? Well, you've heard
about this before.
The idea, the twenty thirty smart city in
Gaza,
as Robin says, which one's Trump Tower? Now
these are just ideas. Here's another picture that
was put around. Gaza twenty thirty five, a
smart a smart fifteen minute city built on
the mass graves of Palestinian children.
Well, take a look at the image right
there or or this one.
These are both images that are, you know,
there's there's these are a lot of these
are put out by people in Israel that
are talking about this.
Now here's an interesting overlap. You know what
that is right there in the background? The
same thing. Except what this is is a
clip Donald Trump put out on through social
about the future of Gaza. Right? Okay. So
if we're watching this kind of background overlap
of what they want the city to look
like, and we can see that same futuristic
backdrop in the new Gaza,
maybe we should think about this being more
than just a hypothetical.
Never forget, Trump posted this sinister AI video
of his future Riviera Gaza. Trump statues, Musk
dancing, women with beers for some reason, monsters
rejoicing in their genocide, and the smart Gaza
city in the background in multiple examples. Here's
the clip.
That's weird. Right? Women with beards? Is that
how does that even really align with with
the idea? You know, just because you know
what the reality is, guys? It's all of
it's it's the agenda. Whether and I don't
mean women with beards or the woke idea.
It's just funny that it's about, you know,
challenging ideas. At the end of the day,
this is something Trump supported. For me, the
real point is about the idea of the
smart city grounded. Here. Trump does a shining
bright Right there in background. Golden future, a
brand new life. Feast and dance, the deal
is done.
Trump does a number one. And of course,
this horseless disgusting video that you're literally showing
while people are starving to death while you're
bombing, murdering, raping, and torturing children, and this
is your you're on their graves dancing on
this place. That's what Rob was pointing out.
Trump and Netanyahu,
Trump Gaza. Trump Gaza, number one.
Yep.
Worth considering at the very least to see
where clearly there's a massive transition taking place
in the world.
Now, I'll include these articles, which, guys, I
think it's pretty obvious what I think here.
The new Trump administration and the technocratic Zionist
coup of the United States or plenty of
other places. Derek wrote the article, election twenty
twenty four, Zionist technocrats versus Zionist technocrats. Like,
it's so clear what just went down. And
either side,
in quotes,
it was going in the same direction. I
think we can all acknowledge that now, hopefully.
And I also did a recent show called
the technocratic tiptoe. Longer one, but I think
encapsulates, like, the real, like, larger scope picture
of what technocratic
tiptoe looks like.
And, of course, True Stream Media says,
quote, some people would rather cheer on America
turning into a techno feudal military police state
that even Orwell wasn't creative enough to dream
up rather than admit they got played so
we can unite and fight back.
Mark Twain, possibly possibly disputed.
They're they're joking, obviously. The point is just
clearly
this is people are just so desperate to
not wanna be wrong that they're allowing the
destruction of whatever they believe in. You know,
allowing a technocratic police state, allowing I mean,
everything we think we're fighting for. My point
is, I'm not talking about the screaming morons
at the top of the paradigm. There's a
huge
you know, a majority in my mind of
conservatives who are good people, who want good
things, that are either afraid to speak up,
who don't their voices aren't being heard, or
they just maybe somehow still think this is
better than the alternative.
Wake up.
I know you see it.
You have
you are you are standing with us, with
everybody else, left and right, Christian, Jew, Muslim,
whatever else, people who care about the future.
Stop allowing yourself to be divided by these
arbitrary lines. Yes. We have differences. Yes. People
have different opinions.
The truth is the real dividing factor is
the people trying to control your life.
So I'm gonna leave you with a clip.
Shout out to this
Reddit page that somebody sent me. Technofutalism.
And it's a video that somebody put together
using AI. Very
it's it's the image that we used. Now
it's it's kind of a it's a little
bit gamey, like like you're watching a video
game, but it's really, really well done.
The the the way this is painted, not
just the video, listen to it. The words
that are being used. This is this is
the techno feudal state is what this is
showing. Not just, like, you know, like, literally
as if we went back into some kind
of serfdom feudal, like,
peasant medieval time, living in straw huts and,
you know, that kind of thing. In the
background, they've got their massive technocratic, you know,
Emerald City, if you will.
And it's important to think about, guys, that
this and it's an extreme hyperbolic version of
it. Right? But maybe not. The reality is
we're being driven in this direction. Maybe this
is a hundred years, two hundred years. Maybe
it's five years away. Who knows? All I
want you to do is consider
not just the hyperbolic framing, but the idea
that it's presenting, the idea that we're being
driven into a place where
based on things we think we care about,
we're being isolated, divided,
shoved into a smaller and smaller, less free
and less free, lacking of liberty situation every
single moment. And it's all, you know, based
on you care about this or you care
about that or making this city safer for
you when none of that's actually what's happening,
at least in my opinion.
So I just hope that you can consider
this at the very least. So thank you
for tuning in.
I I
just I can't stress how important I think
this is.
Not just the,
you know, government transition,
but the deep long like, the deep seated
long term,
you know, ties.
Going back a very long way. Like, we
could get it I could go into this
in a large way and go back to,
you know,
send go back go back before World War
two even. Like, go back to the conversation
of where a lot of this eugenic stuff
started. A lot of this, you know, even
the even the technocratic ink point. You know?
Like, you can clearly see this has been
a long time coming.
And okay. Let's just even say I'm wrong
about what's currently happening.
The reality of this agenda is just
it's, you know, it's as obvious as Zionism,
but also as dismissed, which is interesting. Says
a lot, I think. But I'll leave it
there for today. I'll see you tomorrow. I
got plenty more to talk about, but I'm
gonna leave you with this clip that I
hope you'll pay attention to and consider
a future that they're building.
Thank you for tuning in. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Blockchain tied paid here. Convert your labor to
tokens. AI service certified by the Nexus Corp.
Efficiency
All data extracted belongeth to the lords.
Enter AI license. Get priority access to higher
tier automation. Smart contract assured.
Privacy is heresy. Salvation lies to no credence.
The algorithm will provide for the faithful.
AI service, neurosaging plans, blockchain access keys.
Water rations freshly filtered.
All shall be transparent before the eye of
the code.
Thou shall accept the updates of the great
system without hesitation.
Trust the system. Obedience brings stability. Defiance will
not be tolerated. We bow to the new
order. The AI sees all. The AI is
all.
Damn right. The king's bill is law. The
AI enforces it.
Dark clouds gather, my lord. Thy prompt shall
command. We inspect your no traumas.
The burden of thought has poisoned mankind.
The old world led to ruin.
Embrace simplicity.
Embrace balance.
The system provides all you need. Those who
seek it shall ascend.
Your mind is the last frontier. Let Let
us cleanse it of chaos.
Open your neural pathways and receive clarity.
We are not data. The algorithm lies.
Liberty is offline.
We take back our fate.