It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 08/22/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Have a
few updates I wanted to get out of
the way before we get started today.
One was just kind of a follow-up on
on
a general kind of update on what's going
on behind the scenes.
If you've been following, you know, both, my
discussions on Aim Wake Up in different places
outside of this show, which I don't like
to do this kind of stuff in the
show just because I wanna get right to
business. But my point is you might have
caught some other stuff around in regard to
what I've been dealing with in regard to
lawsuits, which ultimately we seem to have kind
of gotten to a pause moment, which I
don't wanna go into it all now, but
it's very positive. We spent a ton of
money to fight. Ultimately, one,
you know, in the context of not allowing
them to to win out, but ultimately lost
because we had to spend so much money,
and I'm still paying that off in regard
to the lawyer. But that is still a
positive thing, and you guys allowed that to
happen. But there's some that still may be
coming. You know, we're kinda waiting to see
how if they decide to push forward, because
it's all kind of coming from the same
place. But all that's to say that I've
been going through a lot of kind of
upheaval
more than you know, in addition to everything
else, censorship and different you know, in the
midst of all this, I think we we
were
I think it was Stripe. We had a
couple issues with platforms and different things as
well. But all that's to say that we
have got to a point where I feel
like the last American Vagabond is is up
is on the is going up at this
point. Now I had to pull back in
a lot of ways, as I'm sure you
noticed, on some of the different writing, you
know, just because I had to really kinda
reassess where we were.
Ultimately, because of all the attacks, we weren't
able
to maintain the same output. But I wanted
to make sure that we were sound. I
didn't wanna just keep going forward and end
up, you know, not being able to to
take care of the people that are part
of this platform. And so I had to
kinda pull back a little bit, but as
of right now, starting this next coming month,
my plan is to go back at least
to some degree
to
Derek, Derek has been writing, but more there,
more from Robert, more, you know, the the
to the funds to go back a little
bit more to some of the writing, not
to where it was before.
But that's a positive note in of itself.
Now on the side of that, I myself
have been just doing a lot of stuff
behind the scenes for a lot of different
things, for potential future ventures that relate to
TLAB or ultimately just trying to find more
ways to keep this platform growing. And and
and in no way is that other than
just trying to find different associations or people
that wanna support us, no advertising,
you know, things like that. And as always,
completely transparent, the only man you know, money
coming into this platform is what you guys
can see, all public, all donation based.
But as we're we're we're at now, I
feel that I'm good to go back to
committing to a certain, you know, just more
content at the end of the day. And
it for me, it's important that I just
just from my own work, not even getting
into other aspects or other shows that I
do, I'd like to be able to do
at least four to five shows a week
with the daily wrap up, which is something
that's very important to me, like, my own
personal goal outside of the the last American
Vagabond. And it it's important to me because
I feel that this show, as much as
it puts a lot on my shoulders to
feel like I need to cover, not literally
every story, but, you know, the entire scope
of what's going on,
that we do it consistently,
That it becomes more than just, you know,
that it's it so many days in a
row to keep momentum going with these conversations.
So that's my my point is that that's
what I'm committing to starting next month. With
where we're at, I feel good to put
that time back into it and make sure
we can keep,
you know, the content flowing. Not just the
content, but the conversation to make sure that
you guys have somewhere you can look to,
that at very least you know that I
care about being accurate, that I care about
being nonpartisan and objective to a fault.
Doesn't mean I'm always right. Plenty clearly, you
can look back and find examples of me
making mistakes like anybody, but you'll always find,
anytime it's made, me following up and correcting
it or anybody else that's a part of
this platform. So that said, I just thought
that was important to hear. I'm you know,
it's a positive note, guys. Because of you
and the support of this platform, we were
able to continue.
When you know, it's just it's it's I've
had a couple interviews I'll point out in
a second. In and more than one recently,
we had conversations about this. Greg Reese, for
example, said that or no. Excuse me. Corey
Hughes said,
every single person he knows in this in
this industry is flat broke. And I said
I was really
proud, blessed, honored to have a sense of
success in this field that few can say
that they that they have. And, nonetheless, as
I said on the interview, we're in any
moment right now, we're one, two months away
if we have some, you know, situation or
a bad thing from this going away.
I'll I will fight tooth and nail to
make sure this continues because you guys believe
in us. But positive no, because I really
do feel some good momentum right now,
and, overall, the support that we got from
everybody out there. You know? And we try
to get back to everybody we can, whether
it's a a a letter or however else
we respond. But just know that if you're
out there and you support this platform and
over the last twenty months or however long
you've been doing it, it's because of you
that we continue, and it really means a
lot to me. Now,
overall, there was two more points I wanna
make. One was that right now, we're going
through some overhaul on the website back end.
Stuff again, stuff that you guys don't see.
It's not important to put in front of
you, but takes a lot of time and
work and effort and money. But, ultimately, we're
gonna try to revamp the website because it's
necessary right now for multiple reasons.
But that said,
in the process of going through this right
now, he noticed there was some malicious code
on the site, and we just looked through
this. Now he called it a hack. This
is my my guy behind the scenes, but
I wanna get into it more with him
to find out what that was about. But
I just wanna point out that, you know,
this is not unique. I bet you everybody
in this field doing the kind of work
we are in some way is being affected
like this.
Obvious reasons. I don't even need to go
into it further. But also that there will
be some potential changes coming, so look out
for that, but good stuff all going forward.
Now today,
interesting conversation today. A lot of
just the way these things continue to develop
is it's it's I don't even wanna say
entertaining because it's so horrible in some cases,
but it is interesting to watch the way
that these things play out, the way people
respond to them in in regard to the
Maxwell transcript. It's what we're one part we're
gonna start on early today. But I decided
to put off, till tomorrow. I'm doing my
show tomorrow in regard to a few things
that I really wanted to get to today,
but it would have been far too long
in regard to many different stories swirling around
Israel right now. Today, in general, on the
stuff we are gonna get to, I'm gonna
try to catch up on a few things
you probably already seen, but you may have
wanted my take on it to see, you
know, just how I view this fitting into
everything else. But for instance, the
the Israeli government
entity
who the US government allowed to leave, who
was caught in a child's predator sting. You
if you haven't seen that, we'll talk about
it more tomorrow. I've made it everywhere. It's
important to understand, though, that the reality of
that is so insane to watch, seeing as
how they lied about. The Israeli government lied
about it even happening. He wasn't arrested that
it came out that he was. Then the
US government lied and put a tweet out
that said, we weren't involved with that. We
didn't that wasn't us. It was that. Nope.
And it turned out they were lying about
that too. And it ties back to the
two or not the two, but two Zionists
within their government that allowed this to take
place.
And, you know, it's just it's insane to
watch around the Epstein conversation and and all
the people that are trying to hide from
that story, but so much more than that.
That's that's one part of a larger conversation,
obviously, around the ongoing genocide and the infiltration
that's taking place around the world. That just
seems to be sort of an anomaly, like
a byproduct. This person just is a is
a disgusting person and got caught doing something,
which exposes the larger story. But all of
this shows you this continue this continuing problem,
both of the
manipulation of this country, but the problem for
those trying to infiltrate that are being seen.
Very interesting. There's so much going on around
this, but we're gonna start today
with a conversation
multiple conversations around
Maxwell and the the evolution of that story
around Epstein, I think, is very relevant
for many reasons in the especially in regard
to the way Donald Trump's administration is responding
after everything they said around this story. And
it's hard sadly, not
pretty much what we expected. I mean, we'll
get into the transcript that came out, the
audio recordings that are about three hours shy
of what was supposed to be there. I
don't see many other people talking about that,
but it doesn't mean it's not there. It
means they didn't give it to you at
the very least, and we'll go over what
that may mean. It's just a continuation of
this story that shows you that they're lying
to us in my opinion. Overlapping this with
both those stories, by the way, which very
much
interconnect around the artificial intelligence point, the you
know, because Epstein has connection to this research
and different eugenics overlaps. But the AI part
of this
that is the worry of where this is
all going. And Elon Musk had a really
important you know, if you're paying attention, it's
not new, but in a statement he made
that shows you where this is going. And
I wanna overlap that with the Palantir connection
of things you might not have seen, including
Peter Thiel and his presentation he's giving called
the Antichrist, a four part lecture series.
Good times, but we'll get into that in
a second. But, also, we're gonna talk about
the the immigration overlap that intersects with that
story, and then talk about what's going on
first with immigration
in regard to the just
nationwide
unconstitutional
actions being taken against largely people who have
no criminal record. And within that, largely people
who are in fact here legally or going
through one process or another to do so,
which means they're not here illegally.
Nonetheless, they're being targeted. And some horrifying examples,
just flatly unconstitutional and then overlapping that alarming
story with the DC story, which, by the
way, turns out to be very clearly one
and the same. The reality of understanding how
this is still about immigration, what they're doing
in DC, at least in part, has been
used to go after people like we're talking
about. And so it just this is all,
as usual, one agenda.
The narrative shift and fluctuate. It's all about
achieving that goal with whatever narrative they need
to shove in front of you, and it
just is
you cannot support this if you believe in
the constitution. If you believe in the values
of this country, supporting what he's currently doing,
even if they're doing it with good intentions
is the wrong path. It is wrong. It
is not the way this is counterintuitive
to what they claim they're fighting for.
I mean, even, again, if they believe in
what they're doing and they think they're doing
it for the right reasons, as always, doing
the wrong thing for the right reasons is
still wrong, and we have to be real
about that. And playing at the other side
is the reason this has to happen, you're
already lost. Even if that's true, the answer
is not do the same thing back. I
don't know why that's not the clearest thing
in the world. But overlapping this with the
ongoing DC martial law rollout, which you might
have seen, it's coming out now that it's
being suggested more than just the statements of
what Trump has been saying, but that there's
potentially 19 more states that are opening up
for this exact thing. And, of course, in
that statement, conflating it with the idea of
both immigration, but also, you know, just a
cleanup crime because they're all the same thing.
Right? No. It's about March it's about control.
It is about martial law or military, whatever
you wanna call it. Even martial law doesn't
exactly fit to what this is, but it
is the same idea. It puts the right
idea in your mind about shifting away from
what we understand,
what we're told at the very least, is
supposed to be the process.
Now, maybe in a week from now, when
they clean up all the crime,
this all goes away.
Does anybody actually think that's gonna happen, though?
Does anybody anywhere with any
background in following
in history of science, of of politicals, any
of it?
Have you ever seen an example of a
government taking power like this and ever giving
it back?
Nobody has, in my opinion, because I'm pretty
sure it doesn't happen. But we'll get there.
Let's start today
with oh, I wanted to make sure we
pointed out a couple of, recent interviews on
the Lost American Vagabond.
Well, since this page is up, by the
way, make sure you check out this show
we did called the the technocratic tiptoe. I
really do think that was an important one.
I'm gonna be doing some presentations for people
based on this kind of over the on
that presentation.
But we I had, an I had great
interview alright. We go right here.
With Greg Reese.
Just first time we've ever connected on interview,
and so it's kinda more of a sprawling
kind of just about different things and his
opinions. But we got into poll shifts and
different things that I think are really interesting.
You know? And I I haven't gone taken
enough time. I mean, I'm well aware of
the topic. It's been around for a long
time. But, like, the the current relation and
whether there's, you know, in a pending time
frame, and I'm interested to see what's going
around this. It's an interesting story. But I
just I'm very skeptical about the, you know,
use of these kind of stories as always
as we all should be. But great interview.
We talk about a few different things that
I think are relevant. I've I had an
interview with Corey Hughes about the independent media
token, which I think is also very important
conversation. Not to say that anybody has to
support this or, you know, the the idea
the the pushback, I understand him on cryptocurrency.
But if we're gonna be objective, make sure
you look at this with clear eyes, and
don't just immediately toss the baby out with
the bathwater. It it it seems to me
that Corey has a good intention with this.
And, ultimately, that it is about helping independent
media. But it's up for you to decide.
Right? This is not some do this or
support. This is what if you look into
this idea and you believe it's worth the
time, which I believe it is, then give
it your due diligence. If it's something that
is supporting independent media when it's something it's
a grant grants for independent media is what
it amounts to, if it's successful, I just
don't see how that end up being a
bad thing. So, you know, because, really, what's
interesting about this is the success for people
like Corey is contingent on it getting free
money to independent media and then that model
growing. So it's like it's just weird how
the framing I I mean, again, I understand
the the inherent skepticism of anything digital at
this point, but, you know, it's like the
Internet analogy. So please take time to listen
to this and understand it because I do
believe this is if this succeed, we'll help
this in this,
field
and in particular, the independence, not the mainstream
alternative media versions of it.
And I believe that was I think I
thought there was one more, but in any
case oh, and we had an IMA panel.
I'm not sure if we pointed that out,
but I'll leave that there for you guys
to check out. Starting with a couple of
points.
Trusted media said this, and I I I
could fit this in clearly with the Washington
DC overlap, but really just like the entire
show today. This kind of premise, the idea,
the mindset.
What's happening now is about getting the people
to just accept blatant, naked,
op you could just say right there dot
dot dot whatever the current narrative is or
whatever the current government agenda is because that's
what it usually comes down to, just getting
you to accept the thing they want. But
today, just naked open corruption.
And in a sense, I get what their
point what they're saying is that it's not
just about, like, getting this one thing done.
It's about kind of reimagining,
if you will, the way that we engage
with government. Like, that they're just in control.
They're in power. We have no you know,
like, this game we play where we somehow
have influence over their actions. We all, I
mean, we all seem to know that's just
not the reality, but at least they have
this narrative. They want that narrative to go
away or go away. Excuse me. The idea
that you even have any influence, whether that
one vote you did or not, they decide
and you just sit down and do what's
we're doing what's right for you, so shut
up and go back to sleep. And it
it very much models this whole El El
Salvador,
I guess, illusion, if you wanna be honest
about it. Like, it's the same kind of
thing we're gonna get to Washington DC, that
they're cleaning up all the crime and making
it better. Okay. Well, if cleaning up the
crime, if that's even actually what's happening, comes
at the expense of your liberty, well, you
know what, guys? There's a saying for that.
Right? Those who would give up a little
liberty to gain a little security does I
deserve neither. Benjamin Franklin, paraphrasing.
I mean, we have to understand how
intuitive, how inherently
important that is to this country in particular.
And now we're watching people ignore their own
principles or whether they had them to begin
with or not. That's the point. So we
are watching this take place where they are
trying to get you to accept exactly like,
almost aiming at,
I guess, you know, as always, using the
thing they want you to think they're trying
to accomplish when they're not even really trying
to accomplish that to get you to accept
what you would never accept in the first
place. And it says the people involved already
do.
So being me and the government, for example.
Right? Now they already do accept
blanket corruption because they are part of it.
Now they want you all to look the
other way while they do.
They want your complicity in their crimes.
So just as a general sentiment today, this
is, I mean, everywhere you're looking right now,
and, look, probably has always been that way.
But for whatever reason today, they want you
to endorse that. Not ignore it, but endorse
it to be a part of it.
On top of that, with the media overlap,
you know, while we're all kind of being
dragged into this or rather, hopefully, you know,
cheering it on is what they would want,
The the mainstream alternative media is doing a
lot of tap dancing and a lot of,
you know, a lot of juggling. And I
said, it sure seems like a lot of
breaking news coming from the mainstream alternative media
that everyone has known about for quite some
time. Right? I mean, whether it's nine eleven
rehashing they're doing when there's no real new
developing information, which good. Glad. Talk about it.
It's important. But this screeching, oh my god.
Look at this when it's it's
she asked you why? Why now? What? Well,
I think we know why. Or this one,
breaking. Tucker Carlson says Epstein was a Mossad
agent. Good. Good. I mean, I'm not even
sure whether I'm decided on whether Tucker is
suddenly calling things out or doing what I
think he might be doing. Either way, it's
good that people say that. But, again, this
has been old this is old hat, guys.
This is old information. And now we're gonna
get to Maxwell recently saying that's all fake
news. He wasn't intelligent. There's no list.
You're gonna laugh when we get to that,
but this person says the plan is to
discredit people who have been saying this for
years and make old stuff look new. I
agree.
This is an interesting overlap to this.
Right now, the government, in general, the one
thing that it is, is really interested in
trying to get you to accept
whichever side you you prefer that they're the
ones fighting for you. When neither will or
when it is not. Now this is interesting
to me. This was what the White House
put out.
It says this is art from the Smithsonian's
National Portrait Gallery, which by the way, it's
art whether or not you like what it's
about. So these these these absolute
morons in government are always trying to frame
it as the other. You know, it's just
it's just embarrassing. The same thing the right
and the left do. Right? That's not art
because we don't like what it means.
You're all children. But it says this is
art from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery commemorating
the act of illegally crossing the exclusionary border.
This was even made a finalist for one
of its awards. This is what president Trump
means when he says the Smithsonian is out
of control. Right? Because how dare they have
opinions about art that we disagree with. Just
such just dumb. But the point, guys,
I agree. It's a silly thing to you're
you're you're create like, it's not that art
can be made and it's wrong. Right? But
that that
politically, it's being put in front of you
by people in politics. Right? So when the
other side was in power, they're trying to
lionize people who are breaking the law. Okay.
Well, you can make an argument clearly about
people who are suffering in US foreign policy.
We do it all the time, but it
is still against the law. So it's a
stupid thing for them to do. Now let's
remember the reality of of a border crossing
illegally. It's a syphilis fraction. So this game
they play, it's also part of that, but
that's different conversation. The point is that this
is silly. This is political. The idea that
you would try to make this a thing.
Okay. I agree with that. Right? So what
are they gonna do? The same thing in
reverse.
They go, well, let's get this out of
the way. Here's a suitable replacement. Okay. So
here comes Donald Trump's administration going, look. This
is an image called guardians of the homestead.
Oh, you mean the homestead that you guys
were, like, literally
that the government would
do anything they can to stop us from
doing? Right? The idea of the homestead is
so shockingly counter to what the US government
wants from you. It's embarrassing they pretend this
is what they want you to support.
They think this is being put out or
at least the suggestion it's a small thing.
It's one tweet, but the point is this
is being pointed to by the White House
because they want you to think that's what
they believe in. We want you to be
free in the middle of the plains with
nobody around no. Yeah. We want you to
be free in the middle of the plains
with a digital ID and your constant surveillance
and your digital your fingerprints and your biometrics,
and then go ahead. Then you can live
over there. Oh, never mind. You can't have
that much land. Never mind. You have to
be in a freedom city. The the insulting
nature of them claiming this is what they
think and counterbalance to that, they're both
two parts of the absurdity of our government.
They same point. The left doesn't give a
crap about these people. They don't and I'm
not talking about average people on the left
or even people in congress. Some of them
do, some of them don't. They're I think
they're all sociopaths.
The point in the in congress
is the people on the left that are
in power, they don't care about these people.
They're using this to gain a political edge
or to gain a certain momentum. Same thing
here. You think the Republicans care about whether
you're free or whether you have your own
land and no. They're using ideas that you
care about to convince you that they're the
side that matters. It's just so tiresome. It's
so stale. It's every single time in the
conversation in partisanship, it's the same old
hamster wheel. But I just wanted to make
that point that it's constantly a battle like
this,
and both sides are lying to you. I
just wish we could really absorb that. But,
honestly, I think that most people are starting
to. Now that's that I get pushed back
on. I get it. But I think it's
pretty clear when you stand back and look
at the bigger picture.
Now on top of that, some some interesting
overlapping news with regard to the same old
thing, the great reset. Charlie Robinson and I
had a great interview today. We do our
kind of monthly ish,
like, what the hell is happening? We that's
what I called it, our kind of monthly
discussion. We had a great interview today. It'll
probably go it'll go up most likely tomorrow.
And we talk about a lot of this
stuff. We talk about BlackRock. We talk about
things we just pointed to,
the absurdity of the partisan media.
But this is what's interesting, and I'm sure
you've seen Larry Fink of BlackRock is now
chair of the World Economic Forum and just
intimated that that he that the days of
personal car ownership will soon be over.
You know, the same BlackRock that's very, very
cozy with the current Trump administration or the
one before that, by the way, when he
allowed them to take over the the the
treasury of the US government.
Or let's not forget that BlackRock has very
much overlapped with Elon Musk and Twitter. They
funded that. Or, also, interestingly, very much overlapped
intertwined with people like Bill Gates. But none
of that matters because these are the ones
fighting for freedom. Right? Because they yell at
the loudest.
I mean, if it matters, it matters. If
BlackRock is a big bad evil problem that
it's only when the Democrats are close to
it, then you're a child, then you're lying
to yourself. But I don't think I'm speaking
to the majority of people. I think most
of you out there left or right are
aware of what these things are and where
it's going. The point is the great reset
is on hyperdrive.
I've I mean, I've never seen more movement
in this conversation than under Trump's current administration.
But remember, it's just the government. It's just
one part of the continual US government manipulation.
That's why Biden continued the same thing, handed
it out to Trump, and it's, you know,
it's
it's never it's in fact, it's rapidly escalating.
I mean, we must see that by now,
and we'll make more points to that as
we go through the next segment. But overall,
recognize that this is just
it never slows down, and and they just
the hypocrisy of not calling out one and
calling out the other, it just it baffles
me. But at least or really more so
why most people can't call out the people
at the top of the team sport politics
illusion.
But knowing all of that,
BlackRock and the interconnected or Black Cube and
all the Israel ties to all the whole
thing
oh, and by the way, Charlie said he's
coming out with a report about BlackRock that'll
just blow your mind, the amount of money
that they're dealing with. It's I mean, it's
clear what this is. It's clear BlackRock is
one of the main elements to this whole
rolling out infrastructure. It's not hard to see.
But let's talk about the Maxwell overlapped all
this because there's many ways this ties in.
Right? I mean, Maxwell and Epstein are clearly
part of a larger apparatus that they don't
want you to really define. They want you
to think, oh, we got the bad guy.
Put him away. Only once we all scream
for decades for them to go after it.
But, ultimately, it ties back to not just
the control structure, but, you know, I mean,
Epstein connected back to all sorts of eugenics,
techno technocracy level of research. Israel completely immersed
with both of them and and her father,
by the way, being a Mossad agent and
The UK despite, you know, all the different
obvious interconnection points.
So this story itself is important not just
because they're, you know, it's sort of like
you're pulling on a thread that connects right
back to the power structure they don't want
you to see, but because this is the
way that they get a lot of these
things done.
There
are many moving parts to what this is.
It's not just sexual blackmail, but realize that
things like this are how they coerce governments
into during
carrying out policy counter to their interests, how
they manipulate people in the ICC to remove
investigations.
Right? This is the kind of thing we're
talking about. So it's not just these people
that matter, but the what this story uncovers
that I think all of the US government
and plenty of others are really under or
uncomfortable about. So this person simply said, the
government privately interviewed Maxwell for nine hours. That's
important to remember. That's what they said.
Right after they quietly moved her to a
low security prison.
Right. And then
nothing seemed to happen for about a month,
which is just very strange. We'll read some
articles about it. No one is still even
explained why she was moved to that prison.
And she got her non prosecution deal, right,
in the first place. But that's because that's
before they I'll play the clip for you
where they say that even. The the proffer
meeting they call it or proffer
meeting, I think. And it says still no
transcript, which now has come out. I mean,
he they say we're witnessing the biggest cover
up in American history. I don't believe that.
I think I just shared it because of
the point. I don't think this is the
largest cover up in American history, but it's
certainly a cover up. I think that's pretty
clear. Now Stella Fox played a clip down
here that Maria Farmer, an Epstein victim, is
speaking out on the cover up. It's just
interesting to me that, you know, this is
now starting to get some traction. Don't forget
that Whitney Webb interviewed Maria Farmer for the
last American vagabond back in 2020.
Now it's an audio video recording, and what's
so funny the weird pushback she gets. This
is Whitney Webb
who have Maria Farmer reached out to her
and said, I I'd like to tell you
what I know. And Whitney let her speak
her mind and let her talk about what
her experiences were. You know, the idea that
that Whitney's supposed to be screaming back at
her about thing, it's her statement, basically. It's
her testimony.
You know? And and just and so the
way that this gets framed is just absurd
to me. Right? Of course, whether
there are probably in some cases let's put
it this way. When you're in that room
and she's giving her testimony, you don't know
the validity of half the stuff. She's just
simply speaking her mind. And I think that
most of what she's saying is accurate. There's
plenty
other, I would just say I don't know
for sure. The point is that there's so
much information around this, and it feels like
there's so much pushback about any insight, especially
when it overlaps with somebody like Donald Trump.
So you can listen to them for yourself.
She goes about she goes on about Trump.
She goes on about prince Andrew and how
that they're very much part of the problem.
So here's the clip they played, Sarah, that
Stella Fox shared underneath this post.
Lying.
Oh my heavens. Yes. Yes. He's lying.
Yes. And that's Maria Farmer for the podcast.
It's one of the most egregious
acts of injustice I've ever witnessed.
It feels like Watergate times like a billion
because it involves children.
And I think that what he's doing is
trying to cover up his association or affiliation
with these people.
Since becoming president,
Donald Trump has done everything in his power
to distance himself from the billionaire financier
and his vile crimes.
I had a falling out with him a
long time ago. I don't think I've spoken
to him for fifteen years. I wasn't a
fan. But isn't it funny how that's his
statement now? But when he was asked way
back when, he was like, who Epstein? What?
But you you have to pick up on
these lies. Now as always, it could be
that he just knows how that will seem.
Like, hypothetically speaking, he's not guilty of any
crime in this context. We know he's guilty
of plenty of others like they all are,
left and right. But maybe just recognize, well,
if I say that, they're gonna use it
against me. Like, that's certainly possible. I can
I can consider that possibility, but that doesn't
change that he's lying? That's I mean, that's
see, I'll stop for with what I can
prove. And if you can prove that he's
lying, that should matter regardless of what, you
know, logic you wanna fill in to give
him the benefit of the doubt, which is
just never
it's an embarrassing thing to do from an
adult with a politician.
But for Maria,
there can be no doubting the depth of
their relationship.
Epstein said he was his best friend. Yep.
He just said that's my best friend. And
that's on the record, by the way. I
played you a clip of it doing the
same thing from the Daily Beast podcast. He
said he was my closest friend for ten
years.
Very weird how obvious that can be, and
yet
people ignore it. They deny it.
Let me see if I actually have that.
Yep. There it is.
Oh, hold on. Let me move one of
these.
And it's just a really quick
it's just a really quick clip
or audio clip of Epstein saying that. So
how do you know this?
I Donald's closest friend.
So I guess that's it's just it's warped,
you know, low audio, but that's what he
says. I was Donald's closest friend for ten
years. Now it goes on. Don't include it.
So, you know, you could of course, he
could be making it up. It's always possible.
Anybody should be able to admit that. But
if we don't have evidence of that and
the evidence everything else suggests, all the photographs
and all the connections, you know, or flight
logs. How so he
anyway, it's just it's it's like giving that
giving that credence. It's just so embarrassing the
way people try to hide from these things.
But we should just in the same way
that we shouldn't go all the way over,
you know, engage with the facts. What do
the facts show? This is the article from
this was from,
today.
Justice department issues transcripts of interviews with Epstein
ex girlfriend Maxwell.
The justice department on Friday released transcripts of
interviews as today its number two official did
with Jeffrey Epstein's imprisoned former girlfriend as the
Trump administration scrambles
to present itself as transparent amid a fierce
backlash over an early refusal to disclose a
trove of records from the sex trafficking case.
Now what I find really interesting about this
article
is
if you would, like, imagine this as we
go through it being written by, you know,
T Lab or somebody else from before
and the way that AP and anybody else
would have engaged with it. It's just such
an interesting thing to to consider and think
about because the way they're writing this article,
like, you could argue right now, there's a
little bit more allowance in this direction, what
because it's about Trump and whether that's because
the real agenda is to make you think
they're at odds or maybe these individuals per
hate Trump. Both probably happened in the same
conversation. But what's interesting is that they're writing
about this in a way that seems,
unusual for the mainstream media,
and you'll see what I mean by that.
The disclosure represents the latest Trump administration effort
to repair self inflicted political wounds after failing
to deliver on expectations that its own officials
had created through conspiracy theories and bold pronouncements
that never came to pass. Now let's be
clear. Some of those conspiracy theories are things
that I absolutely can prove to you are
true.
So that's worth considering, you know, about, like,
Epstein killing himself or associations of certain people.
So they're lying to you, but at the
same time, AP is doing its job of
making sure that part like, so as we
always say,
let's just hypothetically for sake of conversation. Let's
say that one point right there is the
most important thing. We don't know why. Like,
Trump's connection or something like that. So the
plot of this whole article that in many
ways gives you things that might seem uncharacteristic
to be given by corporate media,
but it's all about that lie. Right? Everything
else is true, but it's about, oh, and
the conspiracy theories. That the the the the
one thing. That's how the most
effective lies work.
Mostly truth and the lie buried in there
in the right way in ways you don't
even like, almost passing, you don't even notice.
So always consider that.
And it says, by making public two days'
worth of interviews, officials appear to be hoping,
that's today, that at least temporarily
keep at bay sustained anger from president Trump's
base even as they continue to sit on
other evidence they they had suggested was being
prepared for public release. So what is the
first one that show you?
That clearly, this game they're playing about how
nobody's talking about it anymore and that's only
a few fringe morons on his base, everyone
can tell that's not true.
Leading Republican voices are saying that's not true.
So it just shows you this weird at
odds, like leader leading members of the of
their movement and the Trump administration.
You know, what how what does that say
about those people if they still support the
administration? It's very interesting. Now it says, I
may have met Donald Trump at that time,
Maxwell says, because my father was friendly with
him. Yeah. We know that, but it's interesting
thing to admit, at least through the transcripts
on this report, because Maxwell was a Mossad
agent. Not hard to look at and not
hard to find out. I mean, Whitney's books
will give you far more insight into Maxwell
and the overlap. That's like a I mean,
what's that movie about Tetris? Have you guys
seen that? It's on Apple, I think. Even
that movie goes into these very overlaps of
his intelligence connections. It's just, of course, through
the US government, but the point is it's
very clear that it's an open secret at
the that this person is tied to intelligence,
but you should understand that it's
Mossad as well, if not soy.
And the point was that she says my
my dad was very friendly with him and
liked him very much. Okay. That doesn't have
to prove anything other than this Mossad agent
was very friendly and like Trump a lot.
But that's a data point to remember. Right?
When it fits in with everything else, it
starts to be pretty clear what's going on.
After her interview,
Maxwell was moved from the low security federal
prison in Florida where she had been serving
a twenty year sentence to a minimum security.
So she was already at a low security
federal prison, which I think all of this
is so insane,
into a prison camp in Texas.
They, you know, they club fed style. Neither
her lawyer nor the Federal Bureau of Prisons
have explained the reason, which I find shockingly
weird. Like, that's
how would you not be like, this is
why? Like, at least we're in the middle
of making a deal. They don't even wanna
say that. Clearly, that's what's happening, guys, or
it's already been made.
The saga has consumed the Trump administration over
the last few month following an abrupt two
page announcement from the FBI and justice department
that Epstein killed himself despite conspiracy theories to
the contrary. That a client list that attorney
general Pam Bondi had intimated was on her
desk
did not actually exist, and that no additional
documents from the high profile investigation were suitable
to be released until now they're being released,
of course, because they waited and you guys
kept pushing. And so they said, well, okay.
Now we have some. You
know? Just just I'll show you that in
a second. The announcement produced outrage from conspiracy
theorists. It's the third time they put that
out there. Online sleuths and Trump supporters who
had been hoping to see proof of a
government cover up. Well, guess what? You're You're
already getting that. That's what's so funny about
the framing from the corporate media.
That's what they're pointing to. So it's weird.
You see what I'm saying? And it says,
and an expectation driven in part by comments
from officials including Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, who
on many podcasts before taking their current positions
have repeatedly promoted the idea that damaging details
about prominent people were being withheld.
Patel, for instance, said in at least one
podcast before, becoming director that the black book
was under the direct control of the FBI.
Now, again, you could argue he was just
saying these things because he knew that would
get him clout with the side. But if
that's your thought now, then at least acknowledge
that he's just a lying grifter that said
whatever you wanted to hear to get your
support. And then the moment he got in
power, he went full mainstream line.
You gotta be honest about this stuff. One
way or the other, this is not good.
The administration had an early stumble in February
when far right influencers were invited to the
White House. DC Drano lives in TikTok. You
know, the real journalists out there And provided
by Bondi with binders marked the Epstein files
phase one, guys. Just phase one. Morse coming.
And then I think it was even,
ABBA and some others. They they started to
tell you that or it was like Paulina.
They started to say phase three is on
the way. And I'm like, phase three?
We didn't even get a phase one. Okay?
This phase one was a bun as it
says even in this article,
where does it say that?
That contained largely it had already been in
the public domain. So even the associate press
can acknowledge that it was stuff that we
already knew, then phase two just didn't happen.
It it this this they've lost the plot
on this conversation.
After the the the first release fell flat,
Bondi said officials were pouring over a truckload
of previously withheld evidence that she had been
handed over by the FBI and raised expectations
for forthcoming releases. Now, again, you guys know
all this. It's just interesting to see the
AP so kinda succinctly break this down. And
it's not even that shocking, but just it's
weird for me, at least in my perspective,
to see this coming from the corporate media,
seeing as how I think it's this is
a conversation that was gatekeep kept by everybody
left and right and still largely is.
But it says, but after a weeks long
review of evidence in the government's possession, the
justice department said last month that no further
disclosure would be appropriate or warranted. The The
department noted that much of the material was
placed under seal by a court to protect
victims, and only a fraction of it would
have been aired publicly and at Epstein had
gone to trial. So they want you to
believe. Faced with fury from the base,
considering what he just said, Trump sought to
quickly turn the page, shutting down questioning of
Bondi about Epstein at a White House cabinet
meeting when he went, we still talking about
Epstein? Really embarrassing moment.
And deriding at people that were actually asking
about it as weakling supporters who said they
were falling for the Jeffrey Epstein hoax.
And not by the way, despite even them
trying to kinda corral that narrative, he said
many times the whole thing's a hoax. Many
times.
The kerfuffle also created bitter divisions within the
administration as Bondi and Boccino angrily clashed at
the White House meetings last month. Oh, and
remember he was gonna quit and resign, and
then Cash is gonna leave, and now they're
back. But, oh, now Cash is gonna get
fired apparently according to everybody else, but now
Cash is now alternatively saving the country. You
know, it just thirty second to thirty seconds,
these mainstream alternative media people will sell you
on whatever makes that moment feel right.
It's pretty hard to watch right now.
Now I thought this was interesting. I just
wanna point this out. Here's Grok
Asked about I and I this is something
I in the note of why these platforms,
you need not only should you not be
listening to them at all, if using them
at all,
but recognize like, the point is either intentionally
wrong information or misleading.
If you're using these platforms,
you'll recognize Grok in particular, and maybe it's
just me. You guys tell me. If you
ask for a link, it gives you a
link that does not work almost every single
time. This first of all, that's linked with,
like, every one of them mashed together, which
I find interesting. But if you click individual
links,
it gives you stuff like this.
I don't it just seems I and I'll
go in there and be like, that link
is dead. Oh, sorry. Here's the correct one.
Nope. Still a dead link. It's a side
note. I just think there's a lot of
social engineering going on, and they don't really
want you to know this stuff.
Also, the one that they give you here
about Emma the Emma the Emma NBC link
takes you here.
But this is what's interesting. Look. This is
the link. It literally says for the podcast
you can't see. Up top, it says
oh, son of a gun. Hold on.
It says,
just Lane Maxwell's
DOJ interview. You see that?
But look at the article.
How to watch the twenty twenty four Democratic
National Convention.
Guys, this is not by mistake. Hey. There's
some really heavy
corralling going on right now. Look. I mean,
I'll refresh it just in case you're you're
confused. That's the link. That's the link that
Grok gave me about what you know? But
this seems to be NBC that's now, like,
redirected it, altered it. I couldn't find a
way back machine version of it. I find
that to be insane.
Hilarious. But also this one. But I was
able to find it by doing my own
work on it, my own research, and was
able to find
platforms and articles that did have the information.
Oh, where where was that? Hold on.
Did I accidentally just close that? Did you
not just close the page?
Shoot. Hold on. I'll I can I'll make
sure that's in the show notes for you.
This was
damn. I must have accidentally closed it.
It it's just this page but with,
all these transcripts. I just wanna make sure
you had that.
Let's see if it pops up.
Okay. Hold on. Gosh darn it. That's frustrating.
I'll include it. I don't wanna take any
more time.
Well, I can just show you this right
now, see if we can grab this.
So what I did,
copy the link,
Make sure to get the period gone so
you can see that's the full link. Right?
Not not found. But this is what I
have to do every time. It's so ridiculous.
I I just do like this. Oh, here.
Maybe that's the one.
Maybe. Let's find out.
Sorry for the delay.
Nope.
Okay. Hold on.
I'm gonna grab this real quick. I think
I'll forget if I don't do it right
now. I want you guys to have the
transcripts that you can see for yourself.
But here's what I did a lot. Here's
how I found it. I just had to
go through the actual link
and got
the words that they used,
and then it popped
up in a regular search.
See if it's still there. Yep. Okay. So
here's the actual link. I don't know how
I'd actually close that, but look what it
said. Look at the link. Maxwell interview. Okay?
So ask yourself why in the world
it's giving you all these random
isn't that just the weirdest thing? I think
that's by design. And you ask it damn
near anything, or at least I do, and
every single time without fail, the links are
dead. And then you find the link, and
it's not even the right link. There's different
words in it. I just think that's insanely
stupid. Anyway, here it is, matchable interview. Okay.
So the important points of this,
first of all, is you've got transcripts, and
every single one of them are redacted.
This is I don't know why we would
expect anything else. Of course, you know, victims,
whatever else, which is not an unfair answer.
But the point is always is that we
don't get the full body of information.
And what I found most important is if
you take all of these
day one, day two audio recordings,
it adds up to just over six hours.
I went through it myself. Do it yourself.
And what'd they tell you? Nine hours, they
were there.
Okay. I guess you could argue that some
of the time was set up or whatever
else, but three hours
three hours of gap? I I mean, I
don't know. I I just don't think that
makes any sense.
Let me close this real quick. Oh, here.
Make sure I've got that in there. I
don't think I closed that earlier.
K. That's in there now.
So here is just to hear this this
is not new information, but just so you
hear it. This is the statement they make
about the meet the proffer meeting, I think
is what it's called. I have this right
here. A proffer agreement. In US criminal law,
a proffer agreement
or what's called queen for a day letter,
Lovely. It's a written agreement between a prosecutor
and a defendant or pro prospective
witness that allows the defendant or witness to
give the prosecutor information about an alleged crime
while limiting the prosecutor's ability to use that
information against her.
But But you know this. We told you
this. Limited prosecution agreement. They got that in
the beginning. Okay? So here's what it says,
and it don't don't mind the image I
used. I just had to put something in
to be able to download this video on
here.
Today's date is Thursday,
July
24.
This will be a recording
of a proper agreement
of
Delaine Maxwell
from the deputy attorney general,
DOJ,
and the time is currently 09:16.
So just wanna make sure you got that.
Right? So people because even people pushing back
on the very idea that she somehow has
that.
So at this moment,
part of the agreement is clearly that she
is not able to be prosecuted for what
she's telling them. I don't know why that's
okay with anybody. This person is a monster,
and now they're working with monsters to go
after what?
You I mean, you point out to me
what the consequences. What does she so she's
giving information and getting a deal that that
lets this trafficker
not go to prison,
and what's what is the public gaining from
that? I think it's pretty obvious it seems
to be nothing.
Well, I guess we'll have to wait and
see.
But so in this, you'll find all these
recordings, and I I want you guys to
do it yourself and tell me what you
think. Because I think three hours of missing
audio are, you know, a little bit under
three hours is just not acceptable,
period.
Because I wanna know what the hell was
discussed. I wanna know what they gave you
know, they handed her a box of information,
like, a whole box that she carried back
with her, and then they then they come
then they told us the 100 names that
they asked her about. So it seems like
they're coordinating some kind of response, and I
don't know why you'd expect anything different from
the US government.
Disclosed TV says Jolene Maxwell says, claim says
claims Epstein worked for any intelligence agency are
BS. I mean, see, this is what's like
Orwell is saying the same thing. Anyone that's
worked on this case in the smallest degree
knows that she's lying right now. These are
things that are undeniable,
even a cost to me at this point.
We know he worked with intelligence. Now look.
There's two ways to look at it. He
was a informant for the FBI. That's very
clear.
He also worked for intelligence.
So these are two but either one could
be framed that way. And her to say
that that's just not true, and this is
in the transcript.
That's ridiculous.
So she's lying to you. Anyone with a
brain is already aware I I should say
anyone with who's educated on this topic already
knows that.
So if you're supporting Trump and you either
have to admit that he's being played or
he's lying to you.
On top of that, Bill Barr testifies he
didn't see info that would implicate Trump in
the Epstein files behind closed doors.
As Orwell writes, why is this behind closed
doors? Why is all of this being done
in a way that doesn't give us any
real
closure?
I think we know why.
Just like Maxwell allegedly faces grave danger
after mysterious break in.
Think about this, guys. This is actually ridiculous
with what hack with what went down. So
there's two ways you could look at this.
Either she's being moved to this because she's
making a deal and she's about to go
free and be sort of framed as the
victim, which is what Newsmax was already trying
to do, like, really embarrassingly,
or
she's being put here so she could be
taken out.
That's just my personal opinion, but, I mean,
this feels really strange. Here's what the article
says. Maxwell's relocation of Texas, a minimum security
prison camp, has stoked fresh concerns over her
safety.
After reports of an attempted break in or
more than one and a shooting inside the
facility where apparently the guards don't have guns.
This doesn't make any sense whatsoever. And what
you what you're gonna hear is that these
guards are, like, arm putting themselves to or
they're they're present they're they're basically putting up
a front like a military in a place
that doesn't usually deal with things like that.
What do you think that tells you? That
either either they know that something weird is
happening and no one wants to help them
out. I mean, it's very over it it
speaks volumes.
She was transferred to Federal Prison Camp Brian
following a meeting with deputy general general Todd
Blanch,
who had worked at Trump's defense attorney regarding
Epstein's case. Now about 01:15AM
on August 9, there were reports of gunfire
at the camp.
The authorities first reported it as a gang
related shooting, but subsequent reports differed.
The Bureau of Prisons reported that the employees
reacted as if they were there were an
active shooter situation.
The Bryan Police stated that there was no
indication of gang activity. So the people there
said there's no gang activity, but, of course,
the Bureau of Prisons you know, remember, the
Bureau of Prisons are the ones that moved
her when it was supposed to be the
marshals. So there's some kind of inside thing
going on here in my opinion. Sources briefed
on the incident expressed doubts about the official
version. The official version of a shooting or
of an of a reaction in a prison.
The official version?
So it's I mean, if you're talking about
official versions of reports of what just happened,
we're being manipulated.
Describing the incident as highly suspicious.
Sources briefed on this are saying what went
down is very suspicious.
A report a police report indicated a gun
was fired within the campgrounds,
perhaps by a guard,
even though Brian's staff are generally not armed.
Author Jessica Reed Krause reported on Substack that
rumors within the facility suggested
the event could have been an attempted break
in to attack Maxwell. But, you know, could
have been is not something I wanna lean
into. Another source indicated a second attempt break
in days later failed to make it to
the public news.
So, again, I'm just I don't wanna say
it could have been this, could have been
that. But we we can engage with what
it looks like, and we can come to
our own conclusions about it. That seems really
strange to have a shooting in a place
where they're usually not armed. On top of
that, to have a follow-up attempted break in
that didn't even get reported.
There's something going on here. Now what that
is, you know, again, we don't know for
sure, but, clearly,
it suggests that there's something fishy because she's
there.
In response, security at the Bryan camp has
outwardly intensified.
Right? So they think something's going on. Authorities
put barbed wire on fences,
deployed unmarked police patrol units, and set up
armed guards in rotating shifts in trucks at
the entrance. Okay. A place that's none of
that's normal for this place. So
they're doing this because they think something's happening,
and no one's being told about this. Bear
we're getting a report from
EN STARS as opposed to AP and MSNBC
and CNN and Fox News?
It seems pretty weird. Authorities oh, and then
it goes on to say guards with AR
15 rifles reportedly created barricades out of government
vehicles. But, yeah, just another Tuesday at camp
at Camp Brian.
An inside source expressed worry about Maxwell's destiny.
It's a weird way way to frame that.
Start stating, I think there is a high
likelihood Maxwell could be killed or moved. I
just don't see her walking out of there
alive.
Wow.
Insiders informed Radar Online, the increased security
could be to prevent a recurrence
of Epstein's 2009
suicide.
Interesting way to write that. That's not what
they said. They say a recurrence of Epstein's
2019
death in New York's jail, which was determined
to be a suicide, but led years of
conspiracy theory.
Okay. Insiders
informed Radar Online of increased security
to prevent
a suicide?
I mean, you could work that out. Clearly,
the insiders don't think that's what happened because
you wouldn't need increased security to stop somebody
killing themselves in a cell. Maybe in a
sense of internal security with the cell, but
that's not what they're talking about. So what
this is saying is the insiders informed Radar
Online that they've increased security because they think
the same thing will happen here, which is
somebody will kill them.
I think that's very telling. I don't think
this was so funny is you'll find it
pretty obvious when you dig into this that
pretty much everybody knows he didn't kill himself.
At the highest levels, everybody you talk to,
it's
I mean, it's absurd. It's the evidence doesn't
back it up. But it goes on to
say, Epstein's death resulted in claims of a
cover up and accusations of the Trump administration
protecting
influential friends associated with Epstein. It has since
been hinted by some critics that Maxwell might
be exposed to similar threats.
Hinted. It's a blatantly obvious overlap, but it
says the insider further stated should anything happen
to Maxwell, it will collapse any remaining trust
in the system. Yeah. Too late. And cast
an in,
indelible shadow over Trump himself. They cannot afford
that. No. You know what I think? I
think they're doing I think that would be
their best case. Well, I said earlier, well,
basically, if she was to go away, that
would work out well for them, I think,
regardless of how difficult it would be to
cover up.
But I also think the best case scenario
would be for them to,
you know, basically
release her,
have her come out saying Trump was completely
innocent,
frame her as the victim,
and then do an entire effort of a
campaign to make you feel like a villain
for trying to claim that the victim was
the bad guy.
Now even though that's
just not gonna work for most people, it
will create a life raft for those that
want to support Trump, and they'll cling to
it, and they'll force everybody into line. I
think that is the their best case scenario,
which which is kinda what I think was
but, you know, you never know. But it's
kinda what I think is where it's leaning.
Now this is Daily Mail. Gislaine Maxwell believes
Epstein was murdered, but there's no client list,
of course. Maxwell, Maxwell, who's serving twenty years
in prison sentence, provided no incriminating information on
high profile individuals, including Trump, you know, other
than the 100 people that she's saying like
a canary about according to Alex Jones. But
you put that in the Alex was wrong
jar that's overflowing at this point, according to
the bombshell testimony released Friday afternoon. Now I'm
not suggesting that she didn't say something about
a 100 different people or that that was
what was reported.
But as usual, we shouldn't take the narratives
coming from government to just go, this is
the reality she's saying, and they're all going
to jail. Democrats, deep state is shaking in
its boots or whatever he says.
The reality is that clearly they were asking
about people as it was later reported, and
she spoke about people that they directed her
to speak about. That's what actually went down.
But clearly, we don't see anything happening. Nobody's
been arrested, but who knows? Maybe it'll happen
tomorrow. The point is that neither does he,
and the reality is that all this points
to right now is coordination.
It says the per the president was never
inappropriately with anybody.
In the times I was with him, he
was a gentleman in all respects,
insisted the criminal who's likely angling for our
presidential pardon, says the Daily Mail. Funny how
everyone seems to see at least the general
point here, but
it doesn't mean he's guilty, at least in
this context.
But what's funny is he's lied about this
many times. You can easily prove that. But
that her statement clearly when she has to
if everything to gain, that's why nobody takes
it at face value. But on top of
that, when I was with him is a
huge carve out.
Was she around every single time he was
there or the times we don't know about?
I mean, clearly, it all it does is
create a circumstance where she can get what
she wants from it, but still leave it
open to where I wasn't around all the
time. But it says she also revealed she
has no knowledge of a so called client
list.
It's just this is just b s, guys.
It's it's and, again, we're not they turned
this into some kind of a cartoon. Like,
there's some kind of a one page list
of names with check boxes next to it.
We're just talking about the the the the
information
of people that they worked with, which we
know they have,
and that being you guys put in the
list for us. Give us the names of
people who you're gonna or anybody you're going
to arrest because it clearly seems like nobody's
gonna get arrested.
It says also, Todd
told she told Blanche in a bombshell interview
that she believes another inmate may have killed
Epstein and that it likely wasn't some conspiracy
to avoid any blackmail.
Okay. Now you may think that's a deviation
to me. That's exactly what I'd expect. Give
them something.
You were right. Brongino and Patel well, here's
what's funny, though, that in a in a
backward way makes Brongino and Patel look like
morons,
but they'll still probably go, we did that
to hold the line until we could release
this, and now you see it all. Freedom.
You know, whatever they do. But, no, the
point is, if you convince them that, yes,
you were played, but the Democrats did it.
Right? They had you know, whatever it is.
She's telling you the truth. Can't you see?
It was all a bit you know, that
he was killed in prison. They lied to
you about a suicide.
But no list. Trump's a good guy. Like,
I I I feel like that makes more
sense than anything. Release of the hours of
interviews with Maxwell come,
wait. Release of the hours of interviews with
Maxwell come the same day that the justice
department transmitted to congress thousands of pages of
documents related to the late child sex offender.
Interesting how they come out the same time.
Almost like they don't want you to look
into all of the pages they just put
out, you know, because Trump told you they
were fake or told you that it wasn't
possible, and but here they are.
It says in her July sit down, Maxwell
told investigators she may have first met Trump
in 1990 through her late father, Maxwell, Robert
Maxwell, who liked him very much and was
fond of his first wife, Ivana Trump, because
she's Czech background.
When pressed about allegations, she recruited a Mar
a Lago employee to meet Epstein.
Maxwell claimed she couldn't remember, but admitted it
was not impossible since she frequently approached spa
workers. K. That's important to remember.
You have to understand that what that just
showed you right there is that she was
recruiting people for this sexual blackmail network, and
she admits this.
You know, to really what they're publicly putting
out is that they because of the sweetheart
deal he got, that she shouldn't be allowed
to be in prison. Not that she's not
part of this,
and they want her to get off. They
want her to be free.
At least what they're doing is getting her
out of prison and giving her our own
little sweetheart deal. And the reality is she
did recruit people at spas for this
disgusting human being.
Maxwell's testimony acknowledges that her father Maxwell, Robert
Maxwell, had a background in intelligence during World
War two as a British officer, of course,
totally not with Israel. And she believes he
continued to help people in intelligence context, though
he was not formally employed by the agency.
My god. I mean, that is the see,
that needs to show you more than anything
that they're trying to cultivate a very clear
narrative for the establishment.
She insists her father and Jeffrey Epstein never
met.
Wow. Her lawyers claim Maxwell was covered under
a 2,007 plea deal that Epstein reached
with everybody we're talking about with oh, yeah.
We talked about Acosta, all these different overlapping
points. They were involved with this. And then
when when Acosta was gonna be on Trump's
last administration, they asked him and he told
him what he did, They said, that's enough.
Good enough for us. They told me to
let him go and what was it? They
still they said, what did they say? It
was that they told me to back off
because he's connected to intelligence.
And to Trump, that was enough.
He's willing to lie and pull punches for
the team. That's the kind of bomb we
that's the kind of person they like in
the White House these days.
Thomas Massie,
after this political post says DOJ to start
turning over Epstein files to Capitol Hill, says
after months of stonewalling, calling Epstein files a
hoax and telling people nothing but porn exist
in their possession, the administration now admits the
files exist and agrees to release some of
them. Americans want transparency though, not smoke and
mirrors.
Now here's oh, you know what? I forgot
to grab this, I think.
You know, it's I'll just go off the
point then. I don't wanna try to grab
this from news break, but
Trump wants Rogan to drop the Epstein talk.
All this is is this is Rogan rightly
calling this out. It's strange. Something's wrong here.
Like, they're they're what they're doing does not
line up,
that they're covering up for this. And, clearly,
they don't want that. I mean, they've gotten
pressure from the Trump administration
to pull punches, guys. I mean, that's that's
what you're getting from everybody else in this
team sport politics field. Like, you gotta you
can't counter signal the leader as the whole
thing. Right?
I find it very telling, though, that they're
getting people from all sides of the paradigm
that are seeing what's going on.
But don't worry, though, guys. Don't worry
because, you know, they got the grand sandwich
caper all figured out. Okay? This guy went
to jail. So it's all about freedom and
democracy these days. Right? They got the sandwich
guy, so it's okay.
They made all these statements and, you know,
we got him, and it's okay. It's just
that's what they're doing for you right now,
tracking down the sandwich thrower, but letting the
Epstein clients go, letting the Epstein associates go,
working with Zionism and committing a genocide and,
you know, lying to you through every single
Maha point, but they got the sandwich guy.
Freedom.
So overlapping these points, let's talk about the
interesting
invasive AI control structure that's being built with
things like this. Right? Using
coercive measures like that and many other versions
that exist today that you don't see that
are currently filling the pockets or coercing people
in our government,
they're building out this control structure, which by
the way, at this point, most of them
probably already supported anyway because they gained power
from it. But as Jason Baster points out,
let me get this straight.
Trump now has the power to wield Palantir,
tracking my every move,
logging my every text, merging health tax and
Social Security data into an AI model to
predict my behavior.
Not Epstein's clients,
not deep state criminals,
me.
How does that make any sense?
And the meme says or the the image,
my clients are still free
to abuse children with zero fear of consequences.
I mean, really think a second to think
about this.
Or how about aiming it at,
you know,
aliens with legal status that violated a traffic
stop? I mean, that by and large, that
is what we're talking about. Regardless of a
pushback, regardless of a people that go, la
la, I don't wanna hear that. That's not
true because that's a Democrat lie. It's the
truth. The facts, the data clearly back it
up coming from this administration.
The reality is they're going after people that
are not who they're claiming. They're not getting
the worst of the worst. They're not getting
the trend day of Iraq war,
gang members. They're not getting the MS thirteen
leaders. They're lying to you, and everywhere you
look, you can prove that.
And this is what they're using. I mean,
this is what's so important is the Epstein
problem really did create the awareness around a
lot of other things, which is partly why
they want this to go away.
But let's not forget in regard to the
overarching security apparatus,
everything we're talking about,
hundreds of former Israeli and, of course, former
in major air quotes,
hundreds of former Israeli spies are working in
big tech. That's Palantir. That's Google. That's Meta.
That's all of it, guys. You can quite
literally prove this, and we'll have some points
to make about it. And more so, by
the way, in tomorrow's show.
Now any idea of the AI government direction
or any
AI use
in government in control structures,
it's very important to see that this is
where it's going. We all know this. They're
being very clear about this today. Well, let's
not forget that, I mean, even during COVID,
even in the beginning of this administration,
the conversation of AI being rolled out in
government was you were called a conspiracy theorist
by com like Republicans.
And here we are. Now it's being rationalized
as the necessity because bad China, but it's
just funny how clear these things can be.
And when you are ahead of a story,
in most cases, the real independent media, it
it's it's you know, there's a, like, a
detriment to being ahead of a story unless
you're in the mainstream alternative medias today. Doesn't
mean you shouldn't do it anyway like we
do. The truth is what matters. Get the
information out so people can see it.
But this is where it's going. On top
of the overlap with the transhumanist
technocratic
direction, it's all kind of intertwined. The Stargate
platform, one big example of that with OpenAI,
Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, Oracle, SoftBank,
Israel in connection. I mean oh, and and
Larry Ellison being a huge part of this.
Like, they're literally building out this apparatus. We
can all see it. Read these articles. You'll
find out a hell of a lot more.
But the whole transhumanist
overlap to all this is important part of
this to think about. Because this AI structure
that they're talking about is not just about
surveillance, guys. There's so many other moving parts.
And one of them is legitimately talking about
this fourth industrial revolution. Right? The biodigital convergence.
Now, again, these are not fringe ideas, guys.
These are, like, as mainstream as they can
get. They just don't talk about it. I've
gone over these points many times. I actually
just talked about it again with with, Charlie
today, I think.
But this is where we come to at
this point. Is that this is I mean,
this is not
even removed from this is Elon Musk publicly
discussing the merging of you of you
and technology.
And now I'll play some overlapping points to
it, but here's what he just said. As
David Icke says about the statement,
Elon Musk, the AI skeptic, as he tried
to frame remember, he tried to frame himself
as AI is gonna kill us all and
then was the one that essentially rolled it
out, tells you what his game has been
all along,
and x Twitter is his vehicle to sell
it to the masses on behalf of the
cult that owns him and Trump.
As we said
Vision for a society where human effort is
no longer required
for survival or productivity.
How do we avoid irrelevance?
Right. I think that's central question. Well, if
if you are
symbiotic
with AI,
where we
that there's this
essentially, a merger of human and machine intelligence,
then
we may be able to address the relevance
question.
You know, like, let's say you,
ride a bicycle
or a motorcycle or a car.
You're you're superhuman in what you're able to
do.
You can now travel faster than any human,
with legs.
I mean, if you're in a car, you
can go
faster and faster than the fastest human ever.
Does that make running irrelevant?
I mean, we'll still run,
and still race against each other.
So
but but you got the
humans working with machines. I mean, they they
actually had these kind of debates
when the Steam Engine came along
and the and the Steam Shuttle.
It's like well, because people
drive a lot of their
value,
from saying that they they can
do manual work faster than a machine, and
then the machine got faster. But this is
a philosophical question that I struggle with. And
the best thing I can come up with
is that you have interwoven
human and machine intelligence,
and,
you have something like Neuralink
to open human intelligence
and improve
the symbiosis with AI
that
that we effectively become
maybe one with the AI?
Not very hard to understand.
Now look, as always, it doesn't have to
be some hyperbolic thing. Who's to say if
he maybe he genuinely thinks that's what's best
for the for the world. Maybe he genuinely
thinks that's gonna do this or, you know,
who who knows? It's not doesn't always have
to be some dark supervillain discussion, but we
should I mean, the point is that this
is not what people want. I mean, that
seems to be pretty by and large the
reality, but that's my opinion. You can decide
for yourself. But what do you think?
Do do do you want this inevitable future
where they're telling you where we have to
I mean, look. This is my point. This
is not new.
I this this is the same old thing
that was being pushed during the great reset.
What's the first industrial revolution will lead to
is a fusion
of our physical,
our digital,
and
our biological
identities.
The difference of this forced,
industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you
are doing.
It changes you if you take
a genetic editing. Right. Just as an example.
It's you who are changed. Yeah. And, of
course, this has a big impact on your
identity.
It is important
to use the COVID nineteen crisis
as a timely
opportunity.
So people assume,
we are just going back,
to the good old world which we had,
and everything will be normal again
in how we are used to normal in
the old fashion.
This is,
let's say, fiction.
It will not
happen.
See see,
cut, which we have now,
is
much too strong,
in order not to leave traces.
Pretty clear.
That's exactly what he's talking about.
The merging,
the symbiosis
between the technology
and biology.
Right? So James Corbis did talked about this.
This is the Canadian version exploring biodigital convergence
from 2020.
The main point, biodigital and digital systems are
converging and could change the way we work,
live, and even evolve as a species.
Right.
Well, just like this one from twenty two
thousand two, converging technologies for improving human performance.
This is what tech,
Klaus was pointing to. Nanotechnology,
bio, information, cognitive,
all coming together. This is the National Science
Foundation, Department of Commerce, the US government. And
the point is, read through this for yourself,
424
pages. This is what I covered here. Government
doc from 2002 revealed twenty year plan to
alter evolution with nanotechnology.
That puts it right about 2022.
Plenty of things you could piece together with
that. The overarching point though is that this
is where this is driving toward. That's what
he's pointing to whether he even realizes it
or not.
And on top of that, interestingly enough,
this is one we've talked about even though
this art this page is now different. You
can see it used to say virus size
transistors.
Now it says something weird. That's that's weird.
They still leave the typo in there. They,
like, rapidly changed this and left a typo.
It seems so funny. But then if you
remember this post from Charles Lieber 2011 about
nanotechnology,
here's what it says.
That
when something is as small as a virus
or bacteria,
a man made structure, it can behave the
way biology does, a way of biological structures
do.
That's interesting. Right? It's sort of like the
same conversation. Right? Telling you, this there's all
of this leads into and, of course, Lee
Charles Lieber, Bob Langer, they all converge around
the COVID nineteen time frame. So there's definitely
something around this, but that's not the conversation
for today.
The point is back to the
I'll include this one too.
AI direction, the AI control infrastructure.
Study finds
six g wireless technology could use humans as
a power source. Doesn't it sound like right
out of the matrix, some kind of dystopian
movie? It's not that far fetched. This is
2023.
Simply says, results show people are actually the
best medium for amplifying the coil's ability to
collect leaked RF energy.
Attaching the coil to a person collected up
to 10 times more energy than using a
bare coil.
Based on these results, the researchers created an
inexpensive wearable device. Hey. That's the whole new
thing. Right? Called the bracelet plus, which people
can wear on their upper forearm. Study study
authors note they can even modify it to
work as a ring, belt, ankle it, necklace.
Although the bracelet seem to work the best
for the harvesting power. Isn't that a little
weird red bracelet? And we see a lot
of those swinging around. Not to throw out
another theory, but but the point,
first of all,
is this is not some hypothetical. This is
a real conversation about six g wireless tech
basically turning you your body into a battery.
Now this is old conversation. They've been there's
many overlaps to make it more connecting to
the six g, though. That's the real point
here. How AI will drive six g and
why AI needs six g to meet increasing
demands.
So this is the point is they this
is how this over this is how this
seems to play out. Now it doesn't have
to be some horrifying matrix thing where you
don't even you know, it could very well
be something like we, this one right here.
Remember this?
Oh, see. I hope it pops up.
Of course not.
Oh, maybe that's this one right here. This
is a,
yeah. Good. This is the one. Thank you
for miss Quniverse for having this pop up
in a search. But you've seen this before.
We've talked about it. Right? This is a
a a Microsoft patent.
Oh, this is not the patent page I'm
used to.
The point, though, is the patent Microsoft patent
to see if it loads is is about
you turning your body. Yeah. This is it.
Cryptocurrency
system using body activity data.
Now things like this require the Y band,
the wireless body area network, which requires the
Internet bio nano things. And, you know, it's
all coming together, and this is about using
your body's actions to gain cryptocurrency. You're gamifying
your literal body. Oh, you think it's just
about that?
That this is the same conversation. Right? So
it's about creating a a rationale
for allowing your body to be used in
this way, your wireless body, your network, whatever
it is.
So this is really important. Now we're gonna
do more deep on this. So and, also,
tomorrow, one of the things I really wanna
get into, not just the Israel conversation, but
the
the,
the Freedom City, Smart City overlap, which we've
talked about in the in a couple shows
recently, but much deeper in where this is
going and who's interconnected with it. It's all
the people we're talking about. The same people
funding Prospera, the same Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel,
inner circle, those in particular funding
Prospera, are the lead people pushing the smarts
of the freedom city conversation.
The point is that all of this ties
in with the same thing. How AI will
drive six g and why AI needs six
g to meet increasing demands very well could
mean that they need
you, your I mean, when we talk about
the nanotechnology point, right, about the idea of
your body as a power source, that that
goes back decades. That's DARPA for you, not
new information.
Include this. Oh, here's David Ike. Something else
that I
was laughed at and banned for now being
confirmed is true.
Oh, yeah. Self self assembly nanobots. Yeah. He's
right.
But
important.
Oh, actually, shout out to,
miss Q verse. I'm just gonna include the
patent so you guys can look at it
for yourselves.
Now
all this being said, I don't wanna remember
these.
Here is,
Peter Thiel. Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has
warned that the greatest threat to humanity's future
might not be nuclear war, climate change, or
artificial intelligence. Let's be clear that was the
one he wanted to say. But rather the
emergence of a global one world government
that exploits these crises as a justification to
seize total control.
Gee, that's new.
Not like he's involved in exactly that. And
I said, says the globalist technocrat seeking to
build a global one word government that exploits
crises as justification to seize total control.
This is how stupid they think we are.
Please prove them wrong, guys.
And this is just a funny overlap. True
street media point to that. It's kind of,
as I said, kind of hilarious but terrifying
at the same time. But just don't let
that go by without acknowledging how insane that
is.
Though I mean,
it's the what they're building out is literally
what they're pointing to. This is how this
tends to work,
or at least how it seems their their
I guess their last ditch effort, the current
US government direction and Zionist direction is to
just kind of, like, bluntly yell at you
the opposite. Like, just their propaganda seems weak
today.
Here's the clip about this really brings it
together. You've seen part of this where he
talks about, you know, should the human species
survive? They this is just a kind of
a humorous overlap to it where they include
a second part. You should watch the full
interview, by the way,
but this will speak for itself.
Peter, you've been doing great so far. Just
some layup questions ahead, and let's bring this
home. You I think you would you would
prefer the human race to endure. Right?
No way. You're hesitating. Well, I yes? I
don't know. I I would
Yeah. Yes. The the answer is yes. This
is a long hesitation. This is a long
hesitation. There's so many questions in question. The
human race survive?
God, man. Yes. The old the only answer
is yes. Yes. Great. But I'm sorry that
the video is out of sync. It's it's
infuriating. I can't do anything about it. I
don't know why it happened. It ruins this
clip, by the way, that it's out of
sync. Fuck. I also would like us to
to radically That wasn't me cussing, by the
way. That was the video. The answer is
yes. Yes. Great. But Fuck. I also would
like us to to radically solve these problems.
And, and so, you know, it's all we
need to do. What is he talking about?
Yeah. Transhumanism.
Human natural body gets transformed into an immortal
body. It's real. And, there's a critique of,
let's say, the trans people in a sexual
context or, I don't know, transvestite
is someone who changes
their clothes and cross dresses. We want more
than cross dressing or changing your sex organs.
We want you to be able to change
your heart
and change your mind, your whole body, and
then Orthodox Christianity.
So aside from the ridiculously out of sync
audio, which made it impossible to see what
was happening, thank you, censorship and technocracy,
the point is that it's it's an overlap
of his interview. And when asked about should
the human
species survive, and it took him, like, a
minute and a half to, like or whatever
that
an absurd amount of time to answer yes
after pausing and asking three different times. But
then goes on to talk about how, you
know, transhumanism,
guys, no big deal,
is obviously where this all goes. The clip
was just supposed to be funny, but that
got ruined by the out of sync audio
where he there's a guy in the background,
basically his handler going like, okay. You got
this. And then being, like, floored. What an
easy layup question that he ruined. It was
kinda funny way to put put, you know,
framing to put over it.
Here's Disclose TV. New tech bro transhumanist billionaire
Peter Thiel will hold a four part lecture
series
on the Antichrist
starting September 15 at the Commonwealth Club at
San Francisco.
Put in this hashtag go for discounts. You
know? She said, what the heck of on
the on the antichrist? No. Look. You can
I it's it's a content it's a it's
a it's a topic? You know? It's like
doing a symposium on on, you know, Nazis
or something. Like, if people can people would
talk about any number of
things, and there's a place for whatever, people
can talk about whatever.
My point is that saying, like, somehow it's
like saying somebody talking about,
you know, whatever. What's a topic today where
people just go, that's not allowed. You're not
allowed to discuss that. It's that should never
be the case.
What's weird to me is with this overlap
with where this goes, with that kind of
a question, it seems like a really weird
thing to do.
The antichrist, a four part lecture series. Now
what is I mean, I just I that
feels
strange for a lot of reasons. One of
them being that this is something that is
kind of an overlapping conversation swirling around these,
like, elitist, megalomaniac
technocrats,
transhumanist technocrats who, like, literally in some places
believe, like, they're going to become gods through
this path. So it just
feels off. On top of the idea with
the overlap of that coming from the Zionist
influence of which they are all apart.
It's just a little too much for me.
On top of that, we have Larry Ellison.
You've seen this. Billionaire Larry Ellison says a
vast AI fueled surveillance system can ensure
citizens will be on their best behavior.
Right? So as they're rolling out their vast
AI fueled surveillance system and they're they're putting
in their their martial elements in place across
the country, is this what you wanted? Is
this what you voted for? Is this what
the mandate was for?
I I I really at a loss for
how there's not far more conservatives, like,
screaming about how wrong this is. There's plenty
of them. Trust me. But it's I'm surprised
it's not entire the entire country.
It's insane how obvious all this is. And
as you're because you point to a Democrat
city or immigrants at large, somehow this stuff
just doesn't matter. I I mean, that that
either means you fundamentally
don't understand what you're fighting for or you're
a not a very bright person in my
opinion. But here is Larry Ellison saying this.
This will be on their best behavior
because we were constantly
recording watching and recording everything that's going on.
Citizens will be on their best behavior
because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's
going on.
And it's
it's unimpeachable. The the cars
the cars have camera, you know, cam cameras
on them. Alright. We we have this will
be on their best behavior
because we record we're we're constantly recording watching
Okay.
Okay. God darn it.
Sorry, guys. There's something really wonky going on
back here. It doesn't even matter. Someplace.
But those kind of applications
using
AI if we can use AI and we're
using AI to monitor the video.
So if that altercation had occurred that occurred
in Memphis,
the chief of police would be immediately notified.
It's not people that are looking at those
cameras. It's AI that's looking at the camera.
No. No. No. You can't do this. It
would be like a shooting. That's gonna be
immediately that's gonna be an an event that's
immediately
rip an alarm's gonna go off. It's gonna
be and, we're gonna we're gonna
have supervision. I know every police officer is
gonna be supervised
at all times.
Of course, the unspoken point is that you
too,
and that's not even debatable. Like, the only
way like, with many of the points they're
putting forward, and he does say this in
other in many of other points. It's about
mass surveillance all the time. Palantir is already
doing it.
And the and the supervision will, and and
if there's a problem, AI will report the
problem and report it to the appropriate for,
person, whether it's the sheriff or the chief
or whom whomever
we need to,
take control of the situation. We have, you
know, same thing with we have drones. We
just if there's something going on in a
shopping center and I'll stop, a drone goes
out there, I go there way faster than
a police car.
There's no reason for, by the way, high
speed chases. You shouldn't have high speed chases
between cars.
You just have a drone follow the car.
I mean, it's very, very simple. And then
new generation generation of autonomous drones.
And as
what does it say? Read it closely. Not
Noxie points out. Are you willing to sacrifice
your liberty for security? Same point from before.
That's all that really comes down to, guys.
Is your these things are fundamentally counter to
the ideals we what we pretend this country
is.
Whether whether it's about the right to privacy,
security, like the any number of our constitutional,
constitutional rights that are being violated,
not rather you know, yeah, violated, but not
observed.
That means you're accepting something that is unconstitutional
because you think it's gonna have a positive
outcome. That means you are un American in
the most quintessential sense,
not somebody who decides to point out a
fault of our government or criticize Israel. No.
No. Somebody who is actively bringing in a
dystopian state while screaming freedom. It's like it's
just it's counterintuitive right now everywhere you look.
Now Palantir obviously is a major part of
this. I'll just include this as when we
mention it because it's a great article Derek
put together to kind of give you the
overview of where this goes called the welcome
to the Palantir world order. But keeping Palantir
in mind
and let's
make it clear again for the millionth time
despite the inaccurate framing for the people that
don't wanna talk about this conversation, nobody here
is trying to say that Palantir is the
only thing going on or that Palantir is
the only part of what this is. It's
just a very, very, very visible
aspect or rather, you know, it's a central
part, but a very visible central part of
what this is. Like, it's that that's why
it's so important to point out. It's undeniable.
When you have the even the New York
Times pointing out things, and it's not because
they said it that we reported it. We
were calling this out well before that got
discussed. I argue it's because independent media talked
about it that they were forced to cover
it. But it's so mainstream.
They're scooping up of data, the overlap with
Israel, the ongoing genocide. I mean, the Palantir
is a central part in the worst things
happening in the world today, whether it's your
surveillance, the lack of your privacy, the ongoing
genocide,
on and on and on. These things matter,
but that doesn't mean they're the only part
of it. Right? But it's the easiest part
to get the average person to be able
to recognize.
And Jason Basler points out, when 13 employees
walk away from Palantir and say this, we
should listen. Quote, Palantir is increasingly complicit, normalizing
authoritarianism
under the guise of a revolution led by
oligarchs. We must resist this trend.
And he writes, Bologarchs promise revolution but deliver
chains. Now see the game is to go,
oh, democrats leaving. No. No. They're it's people
from all walks of life are calling this
out. Just like we saw, like, when they
said, oh, it's just democrats. They're fighting for,
you know, Palestine. Nope. Nope. We pretty clearly
can see that it's people who are just
not stupid. Left, right, Jew, Muslim, Christian, all
of them. Same point here. People that are
recognizing this problem are not unique to one
partisan side or the other. It's really people
that are able to see beyond it, quite
frankly. But the reality is Palantir is a
major part of this. Now, again, like, it
just but by what I was saying before
is also not to make it sound like
it's not
the claim this is some small democrat thing
is so embarrassing.
It's insulting to your intelligence.
Palantir is one of the largest companies
in in this country at the very least,
if not the world. It is massive, and
it's and it's ongoing
connection to
everything.
AI related surveillance in this country is the
the kind of power that you gain from
that is
it's it's hard to even fathom.
JPMorgan,
on that last point, reportedly had to oust
a security chief backed by Palantir
after executives found out he was spying on
them. No big deal. Right? No big deal.
You got a Palantir element that's spying on
inside of the banking. And it's you know?
No. It just shows you what's going on.
Like, the to me, what this shows you,
seeing is how JPMorgan is about as mainstream
as it gets, is that we're watching different
things happen. Like, this is not just all
this is like, think think of it like
this globalist Zionist kind of agenda that I
think is clearly overtaking this country.
Doesn't have control of everything.
I It's just one way to look at
it, but you can decide what this means
to you. But first, it just shows you
that they're invading everything, infiltrating, spying on everything.
But the end what it really highlights for
me is that this is the different this
is the changing of power.
When really JP Morgan and Palantir should be
on the same team. In this case, it
seems like there's at some level not. I
mean, this is just a surface level kind
of overview of kind of trying to take
away from what you can from the title.
You can read it. There's more to it.
The point that I'm trying to highlight here
is that this is,
I I mean, this is the article I
think is always is most important
to to to read from this or to
read about this.
As you know, the the the I think
this is a transition of power.
The new Trump administration and the Zionist the
technocratic Zionist coup of the United States. Honestly,
one of the most obvious things I think
I've ever
seen.
So we know that this is developed well
beyond the surveillance of just, you know, in
in in a in ways that are hard
to even map right now. But, of course,
the immigration part of it, as I've shown
many times, is obviously
what is
has the most traction, let's say, within the
narratives. Palantir's immigration OS fuels Trump administration's immigrant
removal agenda, which now is clearly being shown
to in the conversation of even the Washington
DC National Guard point. So whether that's because
that's that excuse
gets more traction or because it's really both
of them the same time. It's all the
same agenda is the real point we'll get
to DC in a second.
True story media. This will be used against
people cheering it on, and walls are also
built to keep people in.
US Homeland Security will acquire advanced iris biometric
scanning technology from b I squared technology to
ICE to identify individuals in seconds from virtually
anywhere. Tech that was trained
by the you know, on Palestinians from the
IDF.
Very easy to prove, by the way. This
and plenty of other things that ICE is
currently using were first tested on people in
Gaza by the Israeli military. You know, of
course, funded by your tax dollars because that's
how this whole structure works, apparently.
Here's a clip from The UK, but it's
the same point happening here. Big Brother watch
pointing out how they're now using your passport
photos to train their AI as well. There
there's just nothing off the table at this
point, guys, and they're driving us into this,
and it's not about your security. It's only
about control. Far off from people being
dragged out of their beds in the middle
of the night because the computer has said
they've done something which they haven't. British passport
and immigration databases are being used by the
police for mass facial recognition searches. So when
we went to a passport office and told
people their personal data was being used for
surveillance,
it's no surprise that the public thought of
this. Yeah. I don't think it's a good
thing. And I think use of kind of
AI to do stuff like that is we're
going into quite dangerous territory. Yep. I think
everybody feels that way. Let's not forget that
Palantir is also very present in The UK.
Just gonna be the average person who's just
gonna be dragged in for something because you
look like somebody or you're in a place
or something. Whereas the people who they are
after, they haven't got their passport. The government
think that they can, you know, run around
and do whatever they want pertaining to these,
images, and it doesn't seem fair. It doesn't
seem just. I would say it doesn't even
seem legal. I don't know whether the statistic
that we are the most watched people in
in the world correct. I have no access
to that kind of verified information, but I
could see that we are certainly in in
a top maybe 10.
Now, obviously, that's debated by you know? I
mean, The UK is clearly one of the
top for sure, but it's hard to tell
these days with all the shifting momentum of
the last year, you know, and just in
general before that. I mean, you could even
argue that somebody at a place like Gaza,
for example, is far more surveilled because, you
know, of many reasons, but it's hard to
tell. But very much so in that case.
But the overlap, it just shows you this
is an ongoing point around the world.
Derek Brose points out, surprise, surprise, the Trump
administration has found yet another backdoor in the
digital IDs. Let's not forget digital IDs being
this like a central kind of connective tissue
between these worlds. Like, this needs to be
rolled out for them to be able to
control the world they wanna build.
That's that's that's what they would write out
for you. Like this, of course, because freedom
and democracy and fighting bad guys, it's about
control. Will MAGA oppose it, he writes, or
will they make excuses since it's not a
vaccine passport? I mean, we just literally talked
about this, by the way.
Let me see where that was.
Basically, a reverse
stupid thing. Reverse back vaccine passport. Right?
So I grab that really quickly.
A
little further back, I guess. I'll come back
to
it.
But the point is that this is there's
a in a lot of different ways where
there's the real the the real, the save
act and the real ID point. It's it's
all very clearly driving in this direction. So
it says, new, the treasury, the current Trump
administration, is seeking comments on the implementation of
digital identities for DeFi,
where smart contracts could automatically check for a
credential before executing a user transaction. Now, yes,
you're gonna go, oh, but it's just that
one thing. Yes. It's just like any of
the rest of it. It's an incremental boiling
frog technocratic tiptoe to get you in the
door. Oh oh, in this only in this
category, so you're more used to it. But
at what point does that become most transactions
when they roll out the stablecoin, totally not
CBDC version, which is just as bad, if
not far, far worse? It's all driving you
in this direction. So I agree with Eric
entirely. Like, this is just one more step.
Whatever the narrative is, it's always going for
the the the solution is the same.
They'll choose new problems to drive you there,
but the solution is what they really try
to accomplish.
And this is just something to include. It's
just it's everywhere you look. Infant ID, early
childhood identification, you know, getting them now so
they can't push back. Right? Oh, that's just
required by the hospital. Like, you're creating the
biometric system as when they're coming out of
the womb.
If you don't if you're not concerned about
this by now, I really don't think you
know what's going on. I'm not I'm not
trying to say that just having identification is
inherently the problem. It's the way this stuff
is used. And if we can't be students
of history by now and look I mean,
just look over the last twenty years, and
you have enough information to know that this
is a problem.
This puts it over the top for me.
Jessica Roxas put this out.
I mean, guys, this is just over this
this
is the kind of thing that we how's
the best way to frame this? One, it's
just terrifying to see what they're doing to
your children. The kind of and even just
for, like, a data mining operation, but way
beyond that, when we know the kind of
dark elements that kind
of dance in and out of the child
protective services or the school system or the
Catholic church or any number because people gravitate
towards children when they're predators.
That's we just know that same way sociopaths
gravitate towards power in Congress. It's the way
the world works. The point is that this
is showing you that it's been going on
for a really long time and that people
don't talk about this because why convenience?
Well, they've got iPads now, and they can
use this and research. I mean, I remember
when I was trained on Apple computers when
I was in elementary school. They just let
us go play up,
Oregon Trail. And I think it was all
just about normalizing you with the computer, which
even then you could argue was just,
you know, maybe the teachers are like, good.
It'll help them in the future. But my
point is that now it's gotten to a
point to where they're being handed iPads, and
there there are certain, like, in
corporate infrastructure around, like, the like, basically, where
they have, like, a a group you can
hire that comes in. And here's the iPads,
and we'll monitor what they're doing, and we'll
give them, play you know, curriculums and how
to I mean, it's all happening. And what
it turns out is that in that in
that realm, they're taking everything.
Biometrics, they're taking what they're they're they're listening
while they talk. They're recording information. They're scanning
the biometrics. They're, what's the other part of
it? You know, looking at what they search
online,
looking at what they do, what they say.
It's all being cataloged and probably used for
God knows what, but most most obviously, it's
being sold to people like Palantir.
How is that not an immediate violation of
your constitutional rights? It is. Let's be clear.
It is. But nobody seems to care right
now.
You have no idea what's happening in schools.
I don't think most parents or even teachers
realize how deep this goes.
Since 02/2019,
kids have been tracked the moment they log
into their school devices.
Their emotions,
behavior,
diagnosis,
their race and gender, every That the that's
the part I forgot, you see. And one
of the most important,
their their their,
emotions, their, you know, their heartbeat, the way
they like, it's it's a like a neuro
like, it it's so dystopian.
And it's your children. Nobody gave them a
a permission to do any of this.
So think about what else they're doing to
your children, to you, and you and that
with no concern about being honest about it,
especially today.
Act the moment they log into their school
devices.
Their emotions,
behavior,
diagnosis,
their race and gender, every click, every search
is recorded and handed over to tech companies
without your consent.
I was a teacher for over five years.
I resigned midyear because I could not, in
good conscience,
remain in the system any longer.
I have a master's in education,
and I'm currently earning my PhD right now.
And I'm telling you, this goes deep.
Programs like HMH, Amplify, DreamBox,
Panorama,
ClassDojo,
SuccessEd,
all of this Khan Academy. They're backed by
billionaires like Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg.
You can literally Google this info.
You have to understand this then is oh,
the from the,
again, the government.
But, of course, because people wanna pretend they're
different, currently, the Trump administration
completely supports this.
Elon Musk and the rest came out with
the idea of the AI education. I mean,
AI everything is what's happening.
But you need to start seeing this as
just one entity, guys. Like, if we can
just get past the childish binary political conversation,
we could really see something. Because it's very
clear the moment that we start seeing them
as just one government trying to manipulate your
life that everything changes.
It's starting to happen. You can see how
desperate they get, but we have to lean
into that. The point is clearly that the
current administration is absolutely in support of this,
but the bigger point is it's just all
of your government, all of them.
These are so much more than just educational
tools. They are surveillance systems
collecting data on your children.
Schools sign contracts as your child's parent under
a loophole,
a legal loophole, and tech companies are legally
considered
school officials.
That means they can track and collect everything.
Doesn't that sound familiar to having them suddenly
be cur lieutenant colonels in the military or
suddenly being everything in power that matters? We're
watching the transition take place. Still happening right
in front of you, in my opinion.
This is not education anymore. It is data
mining. It is manipulation
and exploitation,
and I refuse to stay silent.
Protect your kids. Ask hard questions.
The system is not broken.
It was built this way.
That's why it's still operating from the same
factory model Right. It was originally designed in
during the industrial revolution.
This system is not meant to nurture your
your children. She's talking about the Prussian model
we've referenced many times. It is meant to
box them in, label them, silence them, and
pump out obedient workers. Exactly. Exactly. That that
that that is the term you need to
remember, obedient workers. That's what this is really
about. It's not hard to look up. I
learned this from James Corbett. It's a Prussian
model with a p
that was used to create obedient workers.
Right? So the and and it's the same
point they make about our medical system. It's
based on triage, guys. It's literally based on
get them just good enough to go back
out into the war that we just never
evolved from or largely because it's more profitable
or more, you know, controllable or more manipulate.
This is what we're talking about. It's everywhere
you look right now. It's just we need
to start being honest with ourselves about what
this is and stop letting half the government
perception of it stop you from acknowledging the
full problem. That's all that keeps happening. As
long as you see it as only part
of the government, we'll never truly solve anything,
which is clearly by design.
So overlapping few few last points on the
AI. Like, let's not forget,
Texas AI centers, and it's just AI in
general, data centers.
This is one example. Got in Texas guzzles
463,000,000
gallons.
Now residents are asked to cut back on
showers. Right? Or in the the place that
Elon's doing, they're being told they might not
be able to keep their property rights or,
you know, their water's not working or it's
just it's it's all over the world this
is happening, and they don't care about your
interests. Right? But it's just recognizing that this
is all one part of the larger growing
problem.
Right? So they need like, going even back
to the point of, like, how the six
g changes kind of the way that the
power structure works.
Right now,
it's not sustainable
what they're driving toward. So there are going
to be massive shifts, whether that's in a
a reduction of the population, whether that's in
some new technological growth. Something needs to give.
They know that.
I've I talked about that in this conversation,
and it's really this one was more so
about
the overlap of this conversation in the moment,
which was about the potential of weapon of
weather modification,
but this was weather manipulation for AI. The
point was we can prove that it's the
the amazing amount of water that's used and
the insustainable nature of what they're doing. And
the question was whether or not weather could
be manipulated in order to create more rain
for that purpose.
And we're we're watching record floods. We're watching
record rainfall across the country, like, unparalleled.
So it's up for you to decide. The
point though is that this conversation is shockingly
real.
And I I feel like we're we're being
driven into this at you know,
with no consideration for how it affects the
lives of people in this country. Here's an
interesting clip from Wall Street Apes. Get ready
for your electricity bills to skyrocket, and guess
who's buying up a lot of American electric
utility companies? BlackRock and Blackstone. Right? Because they're
the good guys. Now, apparently, here's what this
guy has to say about it. So private
equity firms, BlackRock
and Blackstone,
are both in the process of acquiring their
first electric utility companies.
BlackRock is buying one based out of Minnesota
for a little over $6,000,000,000,
and they provide services to right around a
100,000 people.
Blackstone
is buying a utility company in New Mexico
for just over $11,000,000,000.
And why is private equity starting to get
into electricity companies?
Well, let me share a little insight with
you.
PSEG, which is an electric company out of
New Jersey, just reported its 2025
to be up 47%
over last year. They claim that 90% of
this energy usage is from AI and data
centers.
Let that sink in, people.
Your energy bills are gonna go through the
roof.
Yeah. So look at it this way. At
least with this point, you're subsidizing the growth
of AI. Not through your tax dollars, but
through your bills
that you think are are reflective of of
your personal engagement.
Electric company out of New Jersey reported first
quarter twenty twenty five to be up 47%
over last year. They claim 90% of the
energy usage was from AI and data centers.
You know, this is this is spinning out,
and it it's I don't think there's a
concern
about like, if the interest is you know,
you know, look at it this way. Here's
an interesting parallel. You know the whole false
climate change narrative from the left about how
we have to do this now, we're all
gonna die? It's the same kind of I
don't know if it's necessarily false, but disingenuous
narrative from the right, which really just all
of them, to be honest, left and right,
the government, about how we need to get
to this first before a China. You know,
to the AI, you know, which driving there
at all cost no matter about how it
affects everybody, it that's the same kind of
idea. Right? Whether even that is the real
endpoint or not, or maybe they're even working
with China. Like, we should be asking these
questions. At the end of the day,
you're not they're not concerned with your situation.
So if you're out there leaning into these
directions because you think the Trump administration has
your interest at heart,
I have a bridge to sell you. Now
on the endpoint of the AI,
research psychiatrist warns that he's seeing a wave
of AI psychosis. Now something that I'm probably
gonna go into more in a future show,
just the idea of what that means,
because he has an intriguing theory for why
it's happening. I mean, there's a lot of
ways you could look at this, the idea
of, you know, what this is doing to
your mind, the way you view the world.
And even then through that, like, algorithmic manipulation
on steroids, like, I it makes sense to
me. Doctors warn AI as speed running very
vulnerable minds into full blown psychosis. David Icke
says, that's been the idea all along on
the road to the full blown zombie hive
mind. You you think there's no electrical frequencies
coming off the phones and other tech that
you're that that are rewiring your brain? That's
what Catherine talks about in regard to the
neuroscience.
How does the brain process information and perception
electrically?
I agree with this. Or it could just
be a byproduct of them not concerned with
how these experiments affect the way you view
the world or how you feel, just like
with COVID-nineteen.
Now
in real life, like, in real time, in
the middle of this conversation, we see the
enforcement taking place. Now, of course, you could
argue they're different. You could argue what's happening
in immigration before we even get to DC
is it's its own thing. Maybe it is.
I tend to think these are all moving
parts to the implementation of what's coming. And
what this is about, what whether it's normalizing
you with just authoritarian
policing,
martial law enforcement
for what they what what's clearly coming, or
it's just about trying to shut down certain
voices
or both. Right? I mean, it's all we
can see this all playing out in front
of us. The bottom line is that what
this stuff is is so shockingly counter to
what we pretend this country is,
what Republicans claim they're fighting for. It just
pains me to watch people support.
I mean, I let's be clear. It pains
me to watch people who like, genuine people
who are just played by people in partisanship
support
something that is
counter to what they believe in. Violent it's
it's counter to their principles. It just pains
me to watch that because there are plenty
of good people in this that that just
are being manipulated.
To watch something like this play out and
then have people turn around and go, oh,
they shouldn't be here in the first place
without even realizing that the person was here
legally that they're talking about.
That's just the reflexive response. Well, they're criminals.
Well, no, they're not. In many of the
cases we're talking about,
even if it was just a few of
them and it was 90%, it's still wrong,
guys. They're still violating people's rights. But the
reality is it is by and large, the
majority of this conversation is unconstitutional.
And we just have to start being honest
about that. This case, something we talked about
on fine points is unreal to me.
Not only did did these federal agents open
fire on a car full of a family
because I think they just got mad, to
be quite honest,
But they
didn't introduce themselves. They didn't have a warrant.
They circled this car. Now it's not like
again, the reality was not that they knew
for sure. You can prove it the way
it ended up. They went after the guy,
probably from profiling, which is just undeniable at
this point. They're doing that without any there's
no legal reason. They're going after somebody because
they might be an illegal immigrant. In many
of the cases we're gonna show you, they
didn't listen when the guy said, no, no,
I'm a citizen, and beat them up, arrested
them anyway until they ended up proving they
were because that's the the current legal system
we have, guilty until proven innocent, left or
right, by the way.
But in this case,
surrounded the car,
demanded they open the door, and the guy
says, for what reason?
You know, what what's your justification? You know,
you know, you realize even if they're going
after this guy because they know he's an
illegal immigrant, the reality is you are still
coming up to a car and you are
still legally required to present some kind of
justification.
We do have a system here regardless of
how the people claiming they wanna build that
system are the ones that are seemingly not
caring about it. It does matter. Sort of
like illegal immigrants also having constitutional rights. I
know that really frustrates you, but it is
the provable legal reality. So in this case,
when they do this
and then they proceed to bash the windows
in and the guy drives away because he
doesn't know what's going on, whether or not
they've got police on their vest, the reality
is legally, they're required
to identify themselves and
give you some kind of identification.
And and and in in most cases, present
some kind of a warrant if you are
coming after somebody from a preexisting situation. So
let's watch this for ourselves, and then we'll
go over to the second part of the
story that makes it
all the more clear, which is what they
did later around this person's house.
So you see it. They come to the
door. Now before this, they they they circle
the car. There's no justification. They don't know
why they're there.
And they you can clearly see that they've
got police vests on. Right? It doesn't change
the reality that you're not required to open
the door because they demand it, guys. That's
not the law.
And so they ask, what's what for? What's
going on?
Why?
Four k? This is why. Why? What's going
on?
What do you want? What do you want?
Identification?
Roll down your windows.
Roll down your windows. Right? So that that's
what you get in this new kind of
Stasi America. The real okay. We just just
you do what I say or we're going
to hurt you. We're going to violate your
property. We're gonna violate your constitutional rights. All
of those apply.
No.
What's this? Hold on. Hold on.
Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on.
Okay. So they break the window right there.
Now you can very clearly see, which has
now been shown by multiple angles, there's nobody
in front of the car. K? There's nobody
that's in front of the car. There's nobody
that was they drive away.
Now, the important story here or overlapping point
is to remember that there has been I
mean, at least in my own experience, I've
seen online
five different examples of people being caught
faking or pretending to be ice. I mean,
it's obvious why somebody would do that right
now because nobody they ever wanna concede that
no one's identifying themselves, that they're not they're
wearing masks, they're not giving warrants. Of course,
then someone's gonna go, perfect. I'm gonna go
buy a $3 ICE Fest off Amazon, and
I'm gonna go rob some people, which, by
the way, has happened. There's been a rape.
There's been a robbery. I've been reporting on
these. So that's why the legal sit the
reality that is applied where people are they're
required to identify themselves. That's the whole reason.
On top of it that if somebody does
do something wrong, then you have a name
to report.
That doesn't change because they suddenly are mad
about immigration. Okay? So the bottom line is
that was a violation in and of itself.
And if there's already legal reasons for why
people don't trust just because they show up
with a vest on that their police, which
there are,
everything he did is within the law, which
is gonna come out if there's any legal
justice in the world, so he drives away.
Hey. Hey. You can't do that.
That's very clear to me. Nobody's Why you
want an identification?
Yeah. This is just going back from a
different angle.
10.
Hey. Hey. You can't do that. Okay. Okay.
You you saw for yourself. There's nobody there.
They opened fire. Okay. They know that there's
a a a woman, a son, and a
smaller purse a child child in the car.
And two of them opened fire on that
car. Like, I just don't understand why we
can't all be very honest about how insane
that is. Regardless of your political side, regardless
of what you that's so far over the
top. If so if your argument is that
you're you would prefer that they just open
fire on hit whoever they can because he
might be a legal immigrant,
I'd love to hear somebody try to make
that argument in front of a crowd. Stand
up and give me your logical reason for
why they should open fire on a family
in a car because that guy might be
an illegal immigrant.
There's people out there actually making these arguments.
That's the kind of people we point out.
Those are the cheerleaders out there. No matter
what Trump does, it's the best thing in
the world. Just like the woke morons on
the left who do the same thing for
Biden. Same woke morons on the right.
So this, it just continues.
So he drives home. Okay.
He drives home and that's where we'll pick
up the story.
No. I I think we went over most
of this that, border patrol officers opened opened
fire during a targeted immigration enforcement operation
on Saturday, calling it an act of self
defense after a man struck two officers. Now
they claim it's a targeted targeted effort. Right?
Well, you'll you'll you'll find it very interesting
how this ends up. But the family inside
the car said they drove away after fear
for their safety after masked men emerged from
unmarked cars, which they were, and surrounded their
truck with weapons drawn.
Again, I'm the I'll be the first to
tell you that it's pretty common sense that
you can argue they probably at least thought
it was likely these were cops. But if
there's a chance that there are people out
there or just look. It doesn't you don't
have to play the game. The law requires
them to identify themselves. The law requires them
to give you some justification.
You don't have to roll down your window.
That's not the way the law works. So
whether or not it's an immigrant, whether or
not it's a brown skin person, what they
did regardless of the reason was okay.
See, this sort of frustrates people that just
don't wanna accept that. But the point then
becomes,
hold on. Where is that going? But you
I think that generally put that that was
the point, I think.
Yeah. Oh, then because of their people being
dressing up as ice and committing crimes,
that only adds more credence to the the
legal reality there. But, you know, if you're
being pulled over
anywhere, by the way.
The law states that you're allowed to drive
as long as you want to find to
until you find a place that you feel
safe. Now, obviously, you can abuse you could
drive for four hours and feel that they'll
that'll probably be used against you. But if
you drive and you you wanna drive for,
you know, five minutes down the road because
you're familiar with the area, legally, that will
be upheld in court or it should be.
You know as well as I that not
I don't know, a single cop that's gonna
act like that was okay. See, so the
law doesn't always
jive with what the police do. But overall,
he had every reason to act the way
he did, whether or not he knew they
were cops. Martin, one of the three men
in the vehicle, told CNN he was working
with his father-in-law, 18 year old brother-in-law, on
Saturday morning when their vehicle was suddenly surrounded.
The agents did not identify themselves, and the
family stayed inside the car.
And it says,
once the glasses were shattered,
my father-in-law, fearing for his life from his
perspective, he drove the vehicle away from where
the agents were. It is unclear in the
video when officers were struck by the vehicle.
That's very even CNN, you know, come on.
It's pretty damn clear that's not what happened.
In its statement, DHS said the two officers
were injured,
didn't specify the severity. Of course, there's been
no follow-up because it didn't happen. The point
is that are you actually gonna argue that
because the you know, let's just even say
you got knocked over from the car, that
your your logical response is to turn around
and open fire on a car with a
family?
I just don't know why that even the
way CNN is engaging with this. If we're
to pretend that CNN is all like, the
the way they frame it, they're all gung
ho against this and they hate Trump, That's
the way you frame this? Guys, this is
shockingly
illegal. Like, what they did there should make
them lose their jobs.
As the truck drives away, three apparent gunshots
can be heard, three of them, in the
video. And one video shows what seems to
be bullet holes in the side of the
truck, seems to be. One how once home,
the the people who they're accusing of being
criminals called the police
and reported the incident.
At 09:30AM, about an hour after the vehicle
stopped, armed immigration and homeland security agents,
Right? Because the the federal police are not
totally not enforcing the law on the ground
in regard to immigration or anything else. Right?
Along with San Bernardino police surrounded the family's
home. This keeps happening, by the way, where
you've got federal, local, three different versions of
people that just go go after a guy
who who threw a sandwich, right, or violated
a traffic ticket. Like, it's not a joke,
by the way. Talk about wasting funds as
we're talking about cutting costs. They're building out
the martial law system right now is what
it feels like to me. But it says,
according to the the,
the group working with them, Inland Coalition for
Immigrant Justice, the they remained at the scene.
The the police, the homeland security
remained at the scene
from 09:30AM
all the way until 03:45PM
despite never presenting a warrant. Okay. So at
this point, guys, regardless of what is going
on, they're now inside a home. They are
required to present a warrant, And it wouldn't
be hard to get if the guy's a
criminal. Right? If you can go to the
court and say, look. This guy is a
proven criminal. We can prove or let's just
say he's proven he he's a legal immigrant.
I can tell. I can prove it.
Right? Because of x, y, and z, which
does it is part of it, but realize
that even then, there is still paperwork required
to
execute removal. The point, just like with Garcia
and the rest, is so tiresome. We have
to fight through the basics.
But the point
is that once it's now in the house,
they're required to have a warrant, which they
can say, like I said, he's a criminal.
Okay. Then here's the warrant for going after
him.
They didn't do that, and I'll show you
why, guys. It's saying pressuring the individual to
come outside and placing the entire family in
fear.
Quote, this is a clear abuse of power.
Firing at civilians, detaining families without cause, and
silencing community voices is unacceptable and it must
end, said the organization.
DHS police said local
police, quote, located the subject at a residence,
briefly had him in custody. They're lying about
that now. And he was set free, and
officers left the scene.
Okay. That's pretty obvious.
So before you get you listen to their
ridiculous narrative about why they didn't arrest a
guy who they had in their custody,
the reality is very clear.
He either wasn't who they were looking for,
or he proved not to be who they
claimed he was in regard to being an
illegal immigrant.
They left him there. There's been no follow-up.
He is they let him go. After everything
they did after circling his house for twelve
hours, they leave they go, oh, okay. And
then leave, and guess what they claim. This
decision was made despite the subject refusing to
comply and a wounding two officers, which appears
to be a complete fabrication, like a lot
of other things they've said. Do you think
for one second if they wounded officers, they
would let him go?
You know damn well that's not true. And
this is another terrible example of California's
pro sanctuary policies.
So what people are trying to make this
into online is that somehow California's policies are
why they were unable to arrest the guy.
That's a complete fabrication.
What they're trying to claim there is that
he's there because of these policies.
The art which, by the way, who knows
if that's even the case based on what
the fact that we don't even have any
more information about who he is. The reality,
though, is that they could have arrested him
for 14 different reasons. They could have arrested
him for nothing like they're doing all over
the place. They didn't.
You think if they hurt officers, they wouldn't
arrest him? You think if he was an
illegal alien, they wouldn't have arrested him?
Every which way this goes, they did all
of this based on the assumption that he
was a criminal.
And then made to look stupid,
only doubled down, opened fire, surrounded his home
until some,
what's the phrase,
cooler head prevailed
or smarter that simply said, guys, we can't
post this any further. This is insane. Like,
who who knows how it went down? They
left the scene.
Nothing happened.
I just can't stress how far over the
top. We need to see what this is.
We are watching a gestapo like force running
through this country with no accountability. They know
that. And I'll I'll play a clip for
you in a second that literally proves they're
acting with political motivation.
But, you know, I just something about this
story, I just feel like this needs to
resonate with people. This story alone, there's no
way around it. If even if this guy
was a illegal immigrant rapist murderer, it still
wouldn't change that the way they conducted themselves
shows you that they have zero concern about
accountability.
What if what if they would have shot
and killed the saw the child in the
back seat?
Would that change the story for you? I
mean, it shouldn't make a difference seeing as
all the principles the same.
It's just over the top for me that
can't believe there's any Americans that think this
makes sense. I or or that there's any
American that suddenly is okay with it because
the guy's brown.
Now here's another horrifying story, and this one
at least ends with something somewhat positive, but
ICE is trying to break into a barbershop
in this video when the owner
won't open the door without a warrant. It's
the same story. So they are after somebody.
Now you, again, it could be that it's
somebody they know is an illegal immigrant or
could be somebody they just wanted to follow-up
with because he was brown, and they followed
him into the store. The point is regardless
of whether or not they know a criminal's
in there, they still require a warrant,
especially since this would violate this barbershop owner's
rights. You see what I'm saying? And so
now if they are just trying to force
their way in because these are unaccountable
troopers,
They won't open the door without a warrant,
and they go on to start threatening his
parents. You know, the random barbershop owner.
Agent says, I'm going to get your dad.
I'm going to get your mom. Witness says,
y'all can't tell him that, though. His mom?
Agent says, yes. We can. That's how we
do.
These are this is you know, we talk
about the junior team in regard to politics.
This is what we're we're talking about a
bunch of masked up vigilantes who are being
given the veneer of some kind of a
badge, who are acting like monsters.
Here's the clip.
You guys
Yeah. I'm gonna go back to your dad.
I'm gonna go back to your dad. No.
Not at all.
Do you hear that? I mean, even if
let's just say the dad's like, the idea
is you're you are coercively threatening to go
after his family members because you wanna get
what you want. You think these people care
about any account any kind of account or,
you know, repercussions for their actions? Clearly. Kristi
Noem, Bondi, Trump, all of them have made
it clear, you can do whatever you want.
Right. They're demanding they identify themselves. They're filled
put your phones down. People are like, I
don't have to identify myself. I'm not doing
and then he's like, what does that say?
Right? Authority. He's pointing to his his police
or DHS, whatever it says. That's all that
matters to these guys. They're all powerful in
their minds. Look. These are the nurses during
COVID nineteen. It's the same kind of momentum.
They are out of control,
and the power structure is allowing that.
We got a warrant. We got a warrant.
You don't have this number. See it? The
warrant. Who are you? Can you guys Can
we see it? Who are you? This public
country. This public country. This public country. Public
private. You're trying to go in private from
private. It's good. It's good. I'm gonna I'm
gonna go
So they asked about the warrant. They say,
yes. Nothing is there.
No one nothing's presented. They're not trying to
present the warrant. Look. The guy in the
room is asking for a warrant, and that's
why there there's they won't present it. They're
just trying to force their way in. So
this is not the first time they've lied
about that. You realize I'm not saying my
opinion. We've literally covered these stories where they've
been caught lying about a warrant,
failed to identify their names, for pretend like,
claim they don't require to show their faces.
All of those are false.
You realize that despite how obvious it is
that they're like, even the covering of their
faces and identifying themselves, guys, that's law.
That's the legal bound they're legally required to
do so or then that invalidates their arrest,
and yet they don't care. Bondi Trump, the
people in charge are like, we don't care.
Do it anyway because we'll back you up.
Constitution doesn't matter because we're right.
So how this is sort of how it
kind of feels from the side right now.
Right? All these things are terrible and terrifying
and unconstitutional, but we think Trump's the right
guy.
Well, damn it. That's not terrifying.
See. So I think what happened here is
what is a good a good,
what's the right word for it? You just
a good example.
When you push back,
not by yourself, but, you know, like, the
crowd develops. People are filming. Everyone's calling out.
What are you doing? That's wrong. Where's your
warrant?
And they the juice is no longer worth
the squeeze.
I mean, this is this is important. This
is saying there's a there's a always a
number in the minds of the people enforcing
that they can't push back. It gets too
big. They have to pull back.
Remember that. Nonviolent always, in my opinion. Guys,
that's unless, of course, you're defending yourself. The
point in this case is that they are
demonstrating that simply being visual, being,
being present,
you could force them to be at least
not even be accountable, but at least pull
back and break the law later.
So this guy right
here, when you can see that in the
middle of the screen, he ended up screening
all these people and, like, pulling his mask
down after being four you know, demanded he
do it. It's the only one I've ever
seen do that.
It's in a different video kind of showing
the the latter part of it.
So the point, as more members of the
community intervened, the agents left the scene without
making any arrests. The incident occurred at the
presidential barbershop in Lynnwood, California.
So
I'd be interested to find out if anybody
follows up with this story
if they ever go after and if they
just leave it alone. Like I said, if
they never go back and nobody ever gets
a then it they didn't have anything. They
were just try they were just,
what what's the word I'm looking for? The
phrase.
And they're just going after whoever they can
in front of them. Right? They're just testing
the waters. Can is this person somebody who
can rest? Anybody brown? Anybody we know anybody
with Palestinian flag,
especially if we get to a point in
a second where you can prove now that
these things overlap.
The Washington DC part of it is intertwining
with this because they're the same thing.
This is an example of a, in Columbia
Heights. I used to detain a man
and said that they were taking him an
hour away to check his legal status. Now
you know why that's wrong?
If you don't know his legal status,
on what grounds are you arresting him?
He said his wife had just given birth,
and he couldn't eat or talk or walk.
Excuse me.
So we keep seeing this, guys. It doesn't
matter.
Regardless of the if they don't know,
they're just scooping people up and and disappearing
them. This is what happened in the beginning
with El Salvador. We've forgotten about that, how
alarming that was.
If if we had never pushed back,
there would have been plane of the plane
of innocent people flying off to El Salvador.
But thank God enough people in this country
had the wherewithal
to say no.
That's so far over the top. And they
kept pushing. And and people oh, Democrat pushback,
judicial coup.
No. If those were the things happening, which
wouldn't surprise me if they were, I'd call
it out too. The reality is it was
just people trying to stop you from
destroying this country.
The bottom
line is we're seeing this everywhere.
Here's the clip.
This
is what we keep getting.
People that are saying either I have my
identification. I don't have it in my pocket.
Please, I can show you my papers, which
by the way, we're back to the old
papers, please. That's where we're at now. Or
the fact that he's saying, like, you know,
or, you know, just whatever. Like, you can
I can prove this to you?
She she got a policy. Billy, please.
And you see the problem with a lot
of people right now, especially the Trump supporters,
the team sport politics versions,
because this guy has an accent because he's
brown, that's enough for them.
The the point is that plenty of them
are now saying, you're not an American. Even
if you're born here, it doesn't make you
an American. Yes. It quite literally does. Ignorance
is everywhere today.
So the the reality, guys,
we people are being accosted, taken advantage of,
in many cases, who are, in fact, legally
in this country simply because ICE has no
accountability.
This is an a Connecticut man
who has a legal work permit in this
country.
He was chased and tased, shoved, bleeding into
an unmarked car. This says despite demanding a
warrant and explaining his daughter was bringing his
papers for him, they took him away anyway.
Left wrecked
left wrecked truck in street for his daughter
to deal with. More than a dozen ICE
agents had set up the local police station
until they were kicked out by the local
police chief. Now what we're talking about is
somebody who was basically hit. They
they
they went after this guy. Here,
I don't know if it's totaled, but hit
the car.
He tries to basically run, which you can
you know, the argument is always is, like,
why would he run? Well, when you're living
in a police state, maybe sometimes that's the
best answer. The point is that
all of this is happening despite this person
having legal the legal reality in this country.
But it's like I it's almost like we
shouldn't even have to make these points anymore.
If you could just look to the earliest
example of the people they tried to deport,
most of them were here legally. I it's
the some people just still can't wrap their
mind around that.
What's
your
name? Name is Ricardo Chavez. Your name's
beaten and shoved into an unmarked car. They
let his they left his truck for his
daughter to find. Put your hand behind your
tent.
This is Norwalk, Connecticut.
You guys wanna call an ambulance. He hit
his head really hard.
Fucking
ass.
There
it
is.
You know? So to what to what's the
point? Was it something that they ultimately,
you know, were investigating?
You know, just there's just so many examples
where you can quite literally prove that people
are not breaking the law, and they treat
them like criminals until they later find out.
Like like the house we just talked about,
where they literally could have killed the family
but don't care. This one is, this is
just there's there's a lot of these.
And I I used to attain the high
school soccer star while driving to school, handcuffed
and arrested him in front of all the
other students,
had just dropped off his mom off at
work,
a routine they followed for years, a member
of the first ever state championship win for
Toombs County soccer. He has done a lot
of good things for the community.
On out the field, they write. He has
lived in The US since he was four
years old when his parents moved,
seeking asylum from Guatemala.
His only pull, his only, crime was not
not failing or said pulled over for failing
to come to a complete stop. Now this,
you can watch. It's it's a corporate media
clip reporting on the story. You You know,
each one of these cases are people that
are not breaking the law. Here's an example
of one that kills me.
It again, it shouldn't necessarily matter whether or
not somebody is a citizen when it comes
to a law that doesn't apply more. Like,
if you're being, let's say, in this case,
violent towards somebody,
it shouldn't matter whether or not you're an
illegal like, it just should under just the
fact that they're coming up and knocking this
person to the ground because they're filming them.
ICE blindside tackles a protester from behind, and
in fact, this person is a US veteran
who fought in Afghanistan. That doesn't matter because
how dare you film us while we're breaking
the law.
Just in case you missed that, the guy
is doing literally nothing. He's standing there.
Doesn't even appear that he was even filming
at that moment, but clearly, he was one
of these people that had been filming them.
Right? Had been going and filming them in
general, and they're not okay with that.
Support your veterans. Right, guys?
Of course, unless they fight the police state,
then, you know, then they're illegal immigrant, criminal
MS thirteen members or whatever you wanna call
them.
Aaron Melnick points out yet another case of
ICE proudly touting the arrest of a trendy
or a member that turned out to be
completely made up. The guy had no criminal
record at all, had worked for the Pepsi
affiliate in Venezuela
for decades, and whose worst legal violations were
traffic tickets.
It's I mean, it just one after another,
they just lie just like we keep seeing.
They'll lie about anything,
and it's not unique to the Trump administration.
They just seem to be especially clumsy at
it.
This one's important.
This is showing you political motivation.
So if they're gonna tell you that we're
do you know, that the debt the Liberals
screwed it up further, then it shows you
what they're doing is going after what they
think is the Liberal driven problem. Whatever it
is, that's that well, there's no decoupling politics.
Everyone in media and anywhere else, they have
their opinions.
But for them to be acting in such
a lawless fashion and doing so driven by
politics, it shows you how broken this is.
As Melnick wrote, at officers
after officers refused to show badges, a crime,
or say what agency they're from, a crime,
a bystander tells the agent, you guys are
ruining this country. You know that. Right? And
they say, Liberals already ruined it.
Yo. I see I see some badge. Yo.
Let's see some badge work. Are you? Boys,
let's see some badge
work. Do I have to answer to you?
Yes. You gotta answer to somebody. So Yes.
Okay. I literally got yes. You do, man.
So these people either don't know the law
or they they have been directly told the
law doesn't apply to them.
Doesn't it matter? Where's all Republicans? Doesn't the
law matter to you? Aren't you the ones
telling us the the the democrats are lawless
and the ones that are you know, they're
breaking this gun? Well, don't you care about
the law here, or is the law only
work insofar as you like what it does
for you when you're fighting the democrats?
It's just it's just stupid where we are.
I don't know why this is not laughable.
When the Benny Johnsons and Jones and the
rest get up and support thing, why don't
you laugh in their face?
Wait. So you you guys are just masked?
We don't worry. It's a loud We're just
masked up? Who are you? Who are you
guys? What agency is here. I don't care
about that. You don't care what agency?
You don't care. Bro, what agency you guys
with?
Are you guys working for the US government
or not? Back fuck up. Can I see
some bad news? Back up. Come here and
check. Sir, can I see some bad news?
Is the camera on?
Is your
Oh, you guys are ruining this contract. You
know that. Right?
Liberals already ruined it. Oh. Oh, okay.
Okay. Liberals
already ruined it.
That should be sad, but the problem is
the ones that are actually cheering this on
love it
because they're children. Right? They are small, petty,
vindictive children that just wanna do the same
thing back or at the very least want
to profit while that all happens.
It's pretty pathetic if you ask me,
but it's everywhere.
ICE is deporting thousands with minor offenses from
traffic violations to weed possession. Now it's not
to say that there's not you know, again,
you know my opinions about traffic violations or
or in particular, the idea of possessing a
plant. But either way, the point is just
in the engaging with the conversation as it
is, the law is there.
And if we're being told they're going after
the worst of the worst, then why did
the facts literally prove that's false? That they're
going after the low hanging fruit. They're going
after people, by the way, who are and
and the bigger point to make around a
lot of this with this point in conjunction
or in in in tandem.
Trump administration is review is reviewing all 55,000,000
foreigners with US visas for any violations.
So I shared this and I said, hashtag
unconstitutional.
Of course, people don't. Why is that on,
you know, if they don't understand the point?
I'm not saying that reviewing visas is unconstitutional,
you moron. I'm saying the reality is around
this point, you can clearly see that what
they're doing through this is
removing somebody's visa because they have a traffic
violation
is unconstitutional.
I mean and, like, you could read this
for yourself. Actually, I don't think I I
included it. The point is that you can
look through the reality of this. What does
the the legal reality for doing so? Removing
somebody's green card or Visa.
Well, yes, if you violate the law in
some ways, it does. It opens that door,
but it has to be certain kinds of
offenses, and it has to be in certain
context. You can read it for yourself. The
idea that you can just look through anybody's
visas and go, oh, that guy ran a
red light. Oh, this guy had some cannabis
in his pocket. Neither of which actually apply,
especially today, seeing as how these are minor
offenses, if even that in most places of
the country in regard to cannabis.
But that's what they're doing.
And then also letting off the MS thirteen
leaders, by the way. If you're still pretending
that's not happening,
you're probably a TeamSport politics player. They let
them go, sent them back to El Salvador,
not in jail cells, but back to work
with Bukele because they have an agreement.
They did that in the very beginning. You
can prove the amount of people that they're
you could look at the data, the statistics
they're releasing. Most people were here legally either
seeking asylum, which they try to frame as
illegal. They're not. They're in the process of
either seeking asylum or seeking citizenship,
Like they like, we're supposed to be telling
them to do. Right?
Or have a green card, have a visa,
and just making up reasons
or finding some fifteen year old charge and
and getting them deported. Two of which, by
the way, have been Trump supporters who voted
for Trump. We've already reported all of this.
But my point is, they're just gonna comb
through every visa holder and just pluck out
the ones that is gonna be people that
say things about Israel. Somebody who's I mean,
every single person in this country has some
kind of violation in the last fifteen years
that they could try to apply. The point
is that oh, that was the major point
is that you can't just revoke a visa
based on some minor crime. I mean, I
guess I did I get I did address
that
within certain context.
What they're doing right here, I can prove
to you is unconstitutional.
And overlapping this with the farming point, this
is going to end us. Florida growers, Warren
Trump, he's killing farming.
Now even his weird kind of nod, I
honestly, I think it's about specifically their own
internal work, like his hotels, his restaurants, the
people he knows and supports, and their teams
and their companies when he said that, oh,
some of the farmers are okay. Some of
the legal immigrants are okay. Clearly, that hasn't
even really applied to anybody outside their inner
circle, which just continues to add to the
stupidity of all this. The hypocritical,
hypocrisy of it all. According to the report
from NPR, those farmers have suffered losses at
almost half their seasonal workers
and can't afford to replace them with h
two a b, so workers has been suggested
by Trump administration.
So they're they're they're the what they're doing
is hurting the industry.
NPR's Jasmine no. Look. You could decide whether
you agree with that or not. I mean,
look. If you if if you're gonna pretend
like what the narrative has been is is
sound or that they actually believe it, then
you do this regardless. Right? Do the right
thing, and they're breaking the law. Get them
out of here. Right?
But I guess not when it applies to
things we don't like or Trump's team. It's
it's the hypocrisy is everywhere.
Pulling punches. Or or how about the idea
that you haven't seen these kind of raids
in certain kinds of places?
Right leaning locations or high level, you know,
people with lots of money.
It's quite obvious what's going on.
NPR reporting that despite pleas from farmers to
grant amnesty to farm workers, the Trump administration
is resisting with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins telling
them, Ultimately,
the answer
to this is automation.
Well, look at that. And then also, when
you think about there are 34,000,000
able-bodied adults in our Medicaid program. There's plenty
of workers.
Learn to code, guys. No big deal. It's
just it's the same stupidity. Like, it's just
that simple for them. Clearly, they're in there.
They're they're trying to tap into people. People
don't wanna come work these jobs. That's the
whole point.
Automation.
Funny how this all comes back around, isn't
it? Now it's the new it's the through
the same problem they've created, guess what the
answer is? AI, automation,
digital everything.
What a coincidence. Who didn't see that coming?
Judge orders Alligator Alcatraz to shut down in
sixty days, says no more new detainees. Well,
that was fun. Sort of like the Gaza
Pier that was built with all your tax
dollars and only served to murder people.
Apparently, this is Well, I shouldn't jump the
gun. We'll see how the legal pushback goes.
But this is from, this is from today.
But, there was already a legal pushback that
kinda put a pause on this. But now
the ruling is essentially that they have to
shut it down. They have to remove all
the different pieces that make it functional. They
have to remove all the people. You know?
So all this money and time and publicity
and maybe it was all maybe it was
all meant to distract you, but it just
kinda shows you how ridiculous all of this
is. And and
whether it's about the environment, which doesn't it's
not inconsequential.
Left and right, there are people in in
Florida who care about the what is it?
The Everglade or,
you know, the area they built this. There's
apparently all sorts of by, environmental issues with
species that are almost extinct and all sorts
of things, which I don't know why that
would be some kind of a political point.
It should just matter in a general sense.
But overall, it's just that it seems that
it's going away from what it was, and
it's a wasted money and time. Sure cutting
those costs, though, aren't we?
But lastly, on the DC overlap to this,
which by the way is very clear now,
it's being stated as much.
Just wanna start off with the point of
martial law.
Straight from Wikipedia. Martial law is the replacement
of civilian government
by military rule and the suspension of civilian
legal processes for military power
powers. So it doesn't exactly apply to what's
happening, but it does,
especially if you see this continue to grow
into an all of nation conversation. Right?
Martial law is the replacement of civilian government.
Now governing government enforcement.
You know, to my point is this is
more of a mindset to think about. The
real point is it's unconstitutional.
But I truly believe where we're going is
some kind of a a national police kind
of mindset. That's what Trump's building out. And,
of course, Trump's the person the perfect person
to roll out something that we've been predicting
for a long time that people are on
on guard about, that largely Republicans would push
back on, especially if it was a Democrat.
But Trump does it, and it's all about
freedom. Right? That's how this game's played.
Point is replacing that with this kind of
a rule and the suspension of
civil processes of civil liberty. Same thing we
saw in El Salvador. Right? It's all about
stopping the bad guys. Okay. Well, if let's
just even say they're genuinely trying to do
that. Are you willing to exchange
liberty for
maybe some security?
Again, guys, there's a saying for that. And
I know you know what we're talking about.
But keeping this in mind, we talked about
this back in August 6 August 6, Musk,
Trump calls to federalize Washington
DC. If you wanna go back to our
coverage then and predicting pretty much exactly where
we are,
representative Andy Oglis came out and said something
I think is just interesting to to pulling
out in all this. Some of you probably
sure you guys all saw this. He came
out and literally said, give Trump a third
term,
give him a peace prize, and let him
run DC as long as he wants.
Then, of course, the usual response is, oh,
you're being trolled.
Just like 75%
of the rest of things that have already
come to pass that were you are being
trolled until it's now it's the best thing
ever. And we were kidding about the trolling.
You know, it's like it's all a troll
until suddenly it's not. The point is
clearly there's a very obvious push to drive
in this direction because Democrats would do it
first or they're the bad guys and we
have to make sure he keeps power because
he's the good guy.
Except for the twenty second amendment, though, that
pesky constitution that we claim we're fighting for,
the key seems to keep getting in the
way.
It's just obvious that this is about power.
Here's Grapp.
Is it legal for the executive branch to
use federal forces within US states?
The use of federal forces within US states
by the executive branch is a complex issue
governed by constitutional principles,
federal laws, and historical precedent. Here's a concise
overview. Now, sort of like the other point
we just made, the idea is that there's
very clear outlined
exceptions to these things.
So in any context now we've talked about
Plessy Comitatus.
The reality is clearly, even with the National
Guard, deploying them across state lines is a
violation of that. They don't care clearly right
now. We'll get to that more in a
second. But enforcement of the law,
clearly, whether marines or anybody else.
So constitutional basis, the US constitution grants the
federal government authority to maintain order, which is
what they're trying to play in this conversation,
and protect protect national interests.
But the tenth amendment reserves police powers to
the states reserves.
Federal intervention in state affairs is limited and
must have legal basis.
Right.
So the reality, first of all,
is that even if we're gonna claim that
you're allowed to do they basically
roll out the federal police or federalize a
location under the guise of order.
Well, there's still a very clear the constitutional
rights don't vanish because you're doing that. Right?
So that's the first obvious point. Let's just
even say you're okay with him federalizing the
police force and taking over all of the
basically seizing territory
under the guise of making it more safe.
The constitution still exists.
This is the game there. That's why Christine
Ohm says we can suspend habeas corpus. They
don't know what they're talking about. And they're
literally Miller said the same thing. Proud Zionist
wants to destroy the constitution.
The the idea is they're rolling this out
even if you agree with it and then
still not
choosing to ignore your constitutional rights.
Within the legal framework, policy comatatus
generally prohibits the use of federal military forces
for domestic law enforcement unless authorized by Congress
or the Constitution.
That's the end of the sentence, by the
way. So clearly, neither of those apply.
Congress clearly hasn't authorized this. The constitution does
not legally allow this outside of the Insurrection
Act,
national emergencies.
Right? So they could play this as a
national emergency. They haven't tried to do that
just yet.
The point is, clearly, there's already enough flow
to national emergencies. They just doesn't even seem
to matter anymore. So and we doubt no
matter which way you spin this. I mean,
even this, they're trying to frame as somehow
an insurrection.
But, you know, you you can't just keep
them folding in old discussions. Oh, Venezuela is
still doing the insurrection, so this one still
counts. I mean, I just think they recognize
that nobody cares. I mean, we all care,
but there's no Congress won't do anything about
it.
So they figured, let's do it anyway.
Bottom line is there's no which way you
spend this, guys. The reality is what they're
doing is a crime.
Last part was other exceptions. Federal forces can
protect federal property,
enforce federal court orders, or respond to disasters
under laws like the Stafford Act.
Is that what's happening?
I mean, you're watching a roll a a
rollout of an entire city.
Is that all federal property? Well, you could
make an argument. Maybe DC applies, but what
about the other ones? You see, this is
this is setting the table for what is
coming. Just by the way, like most of
us predicted and got yelled at by people
when it first started. Trump's not gonna do
that. He cares about the legal. Yeah. He's
not gonna go. I just DC because it's
so bad. And we all said probably not.
Probably gonna end up being more, and now
it won't. And now here we are. Now
those people are going, we need it because
Democrats,
it never stops.
But let's also not forget,
violent crime in DC hits 30 low, 01/03/2025.
Now, yes, of course. Could they be wrong?
Could they have made up the numbers? Obviously.
Do you have evidence to back up that
claim?
Look. I mean, even the things that Trump
swung up in front of his presentation,
I mean, despite nobody giving that information out,
which is in it's, like, comically absurd. If
they wanted you to know, they would've given
it to you. The reality is people that
were able to glean shots of it were
able to prove that these things were completely
subjective. They are making up their stories. Now
is DC a bastion of safety and freedom?
No. There's all sorts of crime. There's all
sorts of muggings and murder. So too are
there in a lot of places in this
country, and I'm not saying that's something we
should support.
But if you think for one second that
what they're doing is about stopping crime, you
don't, you're not paying attention to who these
people are. They're literally committing crime by doing
what they're doing. On top of that, you
can look at what they're doing anywhere in
the world, especially in this country, and prove
to yourself that they don't care about these
things,
as will be evidenced by the ongoing crime
in DC the moment they get what they
want.
But the point is all they can do
is go like Miller came out and said,
those are Democrat lies. Please
take the moment to prove this to us.
Show us why you know that. Just by
saying we know Democrats lie does not work
for anybody with a brain. Yes. They do.
But you can't people who care about these
things want it to be proven, especially as
you're clearly grabbing power from some kind of
technocratic Zionist position.
But National Guard federalized the DC police, putting
the DEA head in the in the you
know, inserting them as the head of the
metro it's it's everything about this is wildly
unprecedented.
And here's Trump
in regard to this situation, talking about the
numbers and the lying about it. The mayor
made this, appears to be said, and we'll
talk about it afterward.
Give you more control over DC when they
return from recess?
Look, DC is a miracle what's happened.
I mean, they can come up with fake
numbers like the mayor is doing. Oh, no.
It was going down for twenty years. You
didn't live here. You you know? Have you
been mugged? Okay.
Right. Because someone's been mugged. Therefore, we know
it's
all
true. I mean, really?
Alright. Can you can do this? You can
go to New York City. I've actually I
mean, pretty much every I mean, everybody knows
ever lived in that city has has a
story about being mugged or being does that
I mean, yeah, New York City got a
lot of crime. But is it considered to
be worse than any country in the world?
I don't know. Maybe. But the point is
at the end of the day, that's what
matters, the provable information. And if you can
prove that DC is the worst in the
world, it still wouldn't rationalize your illegal
actions. Like, this is the same idea about
deporting American citizens. Well, if they bop a
grandma on the head, if they rape people,
that doesn't change the legal reality.
Just because you don't the crime is that
serious, yes. I think rapists are bad too.
It does not change the legal reality of
how things are supposed to be done. He
all they're doing is using certain situations to
get you pliable, to get you willing to
ignore what they know you're supposed to think
is
foundational
in order to set the table for the
next time they do it a little bit
more, a little bit further
every single day. It's from left, from right,
every administration as far back as you wanna
look.
DC was a hellhole,
and now it's safe. And in fact, I
put Oh, look at that. Just like that.
Now it's all safe. Right? Because the crime
the criminals all just got arrested? No.
I mean, they they I mean, the reality
is they've arrested some people, but, like, a
fraction of what the reality is. So why
is it all safe now?
Because it's an
illusion. Just like with Bukele, I probably wouldn't
be surprised if they literally made deals with
gangs on the streets of New York or
or DC. It's exactly what the Bukele model
is. Suspense civil liberties, lie about what's going
on, preach it's all freedom and happiness because
the criminals are now we're on your side.
It's sort of how government operates, isn't it?
I'm just I'm being kind of facetious, but
wouldn't surprise me. Overall,
you're gonna pretend that DC is just suddenly
safe based on your breaking the law,
not based on you tackling anybody in the
streets. I mean, think of it like this.
They have been going after people who are
criminals and not alike. Pretty much anybody out.
We've seen videos of them tackling people. We've
seen them accosting people on their own stoops.
So pretty if you just flush the street
with a bunch of maniacal cops, yeah, well,
crime's gonna slow down too. They're gonna go,
oh, we're gonna wait until they get out
of the way. Does that mean the crime
is done, that it's no longer there, that
it's suddenly safe? No. It just means you've
created a lull because of your police state.
Hey. Maybe that's what you all want. I
don't.
This morning. It's it's I said, I hate
to say this because it doesn't sound very
good, but there have been no murders in
DC in the last week. That's the first
time in anybody's memory that you haven't had
a murder in a week.
I mean, I is that true?
I'd love to find out how I mean,
how can I mean, the end of the
day, if if they're now basically occupying the
city, isn't it just as likely that they
could lie about that?
You know what I mean? I'm just my
point is it's ultimately irrelevant
to them breaking the law in what they're
doing. But it's funny how the numbers now
are all taken at face value and before
it was all a bunch of lies. I
find it hard to believe that there's just
simply zero murder because they're there.
The large place, and there's lots of places
where they're not at, but it doesn't matter
at the end of the day, guys, Whether
or not there's high crime,
the law still applies to them.
And I think the mayor has to get
on the ball because,
we have,
a situate and she's a nice woman.
Look at his hat. See, guys, there's so
much coordinate. Trump was right about everything. That's
an Alex Jones meme. It's just it's just
what do you mean he's right about everything?
You mean except literally most of what he
talks about? Same with Biden. I mean, I
could I mean, right now, I could prove
to you 14 lies he said in the
I mean, we already gone over a lot
of this stuff. Lies about Garcia, lies about
his tattoos, right about everything. How embarrassing. But
people love it. It's all a game to
them.
But I'll tell you what she's gotta get
on the ball. We we have I don't
I don't wanna see phony numbers.
DC hit an all time high last year
of
absolute total crime.
What does that even mean?
Is that a specific statistic of absolute total
crime? Is that a different from complete crime?
He's just
he's just throwing things out there, guys. He
doesn't this is, like, how embarrassing it is.
And, again, if you think it's about left
versus right, you're not paying attention, but he
is bad about it. He'll he speaks off
the cuff and throws out nonsense all the
time. And it continued pretty bad. And then
we And listen to that statement. It's completely
abstract.
Of absolute total we we have I don't
I don't wanna see phony numbers.
DC hit an all time high last year
of absolute total crime,
and it continued pretty bad.
Oh, okay. Real
it the highest of absolute total crime, and
it continued pretty bad.
Easy to break that down. And then we
put some strength some strength into it, got
the numbers down a little bit, but, we
broke Oh, wait. A little bit. I thought
you just said that it was safe and
it's all clean. But now it's only down
a little bit? See, it's funny. On one
side of the conversation, it's about how great
we are, and we solved everything. And the
latter half of the conversation is, well, it's
not done yet. We got a lot more
work to do. We need at least six
more months to finish this out. You know?
It's like, you maybe do that in two
separate sentences next time. But in the,
DC National Guard,
and we couple them with the police, and
it has been amazing. I have friends that
live here. People that work in the White
House, but I have friends that live here.
They're all going out to dinner now. They
haven't got He does this every time. All
the foreign leaders are going, please, Trump. Please
make a deal with me. He did it
just like that. And turns out he lied
about all of that. He does this. He
this is what this shows me is not
just kind of like a narcissism, but like
a insecurity.
This constant need to be like, I'm the
best, and everyone likes me, and everyone's asking
me for everything, and I did this, and
they're all it's amazing. What you did is
the best I've ever seen, and anyone's ever
done anything. Everything he does is hyperbolic.
That's see that's weakness to me. But either
way, do you really think he's got all
these friends in DC who go, man, Trump,
everything's different now. I just maybe.
But just know how often he gets caught
lying about exactly like that just to sell
his narrative.
Out in years.
One man I had told this story yesterday
when we were with the
police and with the National Guard. We had
a great little celebration. Brought them hamburgers. Brought
them pizza, but we were with them. And
I Yeah. He brought he brought some pizzas
to the police state, and the Benny Johnsons
of the world loved it. Nick Sorter was
like, yay.
Feeding the police state. Freedom.
I told the story about one friend hasn't
been out in four years to a restaurant,
and now he's been out four nights in
a row. He called me this morning.
He said it's so safe. He feels like
totally safe. He can walk. He's got a
10 block walk. He walks it. He wouldn't
have walked those 10 blocks. He said it
would be a a chain of hell, he
called it. He said it's it was just
horrible. He had no chance of making it
to the Tenth Block. No chance. He would
have been murdered just like that. Now he's
completely free. Look. There's probably some level to
it, guys. Right? I mean, the idea that
in a normal day probably is kinda
places like that. I mean, even like look.
I lived in in Honolulu for,
I don't know,
years.
And the point is that down Downtown Waikiki
can be pretty rough at night. There's lots
of crime. My point, though, is that it's
like, you know, it's not it doesn't even
matter. The bottom line is
you can have that happen in lots of
cities
where there's there's dangerous and so is it
better now? I don't know. That's up for
debate. It really is. Lots of people have
different opinions, especially whether you're exchanging one thug
for another in a police state. But the
end of the day
is if you roll out a bunch of
DHS and and spend all this money to
just, like, patrol everything, well, yes, there will
be less people in the streets. Does that
mean crime is gone? No.
So this is just a game of illusions
at the end of the day. And guess
what? Doing so in a police state unconstitutional
manner. So who's really winning here? The state.
So Aaron Melnick points points out,
Richland Mernick, Trump once again making up statistics
of crime in DC. And And this is
his opinion, but, look, I agree with this.
No matter where you look, yes. Could it
be falsified? Anything could be falsified.
Is there any evidence to suggest that the
numbers we can see are count is there
some other
do you have data you're counterbalancing it with?
Not that I can see. And it says
DC crime, like in almost every other major
city, hit all time highs in the nineteen
eighties, nineteen nineties.
Right. So he's lying about it hitting an
all time high right before he started this,
which, you know, you can look up. You
can see the data contradicts what he says.
So if your choice is just to line
up with whatever Trump says regardless of any
source material, well, then you've already made your
choice. Just you your choice is to nod
before he even opens his mouth. That's what
this is.
Now today, Trump threatens full federal takeover,
Not just the police, not just, you know,
enforcing for now, but a full federal takeover
of Washington DC accuses the mayor of peddling
inaccurate crime figures. So it's just incremental. It's
barely even a boiling frog at this point.
I mean, they'd crank this up right away,
guys. They're we're gonna take it took a
matter of days between
sweeping up the crime to maybe federalizing the
police to maybe walking down, you know, now
full federal takeover to them thirty seconds later,
we're gonna roll this out around the country.
Before that, actually, defense secretary
authorizes National Guard in DC to carry arms.
Right? So we're thinking about a complete takeover
of the entire area, and we're also gonna
allow you guys to now carry arms even
though that is a violation
every which way about this, guys.
Of course, this is why this becomes relevant
again. Remember when Nick came out and said,
AG bond Bondi just deputized secret service
to giving them warrantless arrest powers. Woo hoo.
Freedom.
And, of course, the argument is, well, don't
all police have that power? You more well,
yes. BC, if you're not if you're engaging
with this as if what they tell you
is the only thing going on, like a
child, then maybe that makes sense to you.
When you can look at the facts and
recognize that they're not just you know, are
you really thinking Secret Service are walking up
with the Billy Club up and down the
street going, don't bash those windows. We're just
keeping the peace. That's not what they're doing,
especially when you get to the point, where
we're gonna get to in a second, that
shows you they're actually continuing the ICE raids
on immigrants
through this logic.
The point is that all you really did
was deputize these people to act without warrants
in everything they're doing, which is what they're
now doing, bursting into homes, arresting people because
they look like they're breaking the law with
nothing other than assumption. That's what this was.
But you can read through the comments of
people screaming, it's insane, the stupidity around this
conversation.
I said, so, Nick Sjorda, you're now cheering
on warrantless arrest powers?
It's America first to openly violate the US
constitution because they did it first, which is
the argument. Democrats ruined it. We have to
fight for it, take it back. It seems
you're blindly cheerleading this country right into despotism
along with all your team sport politics sycophants.
That's the reality, guys. You've created a Gestapo
police force that has no accountability, who is
not just enforcing the law on the streets,
but looking for people, hunting things out, going
after people that look like you're in the
wrong place, or walking up people in their
homes and saying, give me your identification. That's
not this that is not see, people like
Nick, especially today, would tell you that's how
it's supposed to work. They're just trying to
keep the streets safe because you're now basically
boot looking supporters of the empire while you're
acting somehow still like your rebels die in
the deep state.
It's kinda sad, but I think more and
more people are starting to see that.
Now Miller is a whole special case in
all of this. Like, I frankly think it's
very clear this guy has so much disdain
for Americans
that it's hard to watch him speak. He
it it's it's the same way I felt
Elon Musk was pretending to be MAGA or
whatever you the way he was kind of
playing what he thought you wanted. It was
hard to watch. It was so obvious.
This guy is clearly out to destroy this
place. That's my opinion.
He is a very proud Zionist who actively
does not think this country should even exist,
in my opinion. The point is he is
now coming out and screaming
what the what needs to be said to
get rabid specifically, teams for Republicans
to do whatever they say next.
Miller unloads on stupid white hippies and communism
and unhinged crime rant, as Daily Beast, the
Republican platform, puts it. What I think is
crazy about this is they're trying to turn
this into just just like we saw during,
and which is still
happening, people who were protesting the genocide.
And morons like this guy turned him into
Hamas supporting Democrats,
liberals who hate freedom in the country. I
mean,
not sure some of them were there, but
when you now stand back and look, it
was literally anybody but morals. Left, right, aware
of the illusion.
People, Jews, Muslims, Christians, all supporting it, and
they turned them all into antisemites.
That's what this it's lazy
and honestly didn't even work, but the narrow
the the power structures carry forward. So here
he is doing the same thing. He wants
you to think people protesting one of the
most obvious, you know, martial law police state
rollouts I've ever seen. He wants you to
think they're a bunch of Democrat 80 year
old women who, you know, I'll let I'll
let you listen to the way he describes
it. It's insulting because whether or not they're
the characteristics he lays out, people are protesting
it because this is wrong.
And Miller
is cheering it on the destruction of this
country. White House aide Stephen Miller has embarked
on an unhinged rant about stupid white hippies
who have inspired him to bring more troops
into the Capitol. See, it speaks for itself.
Well, actually, let me play it first and
I'll read this because it'll it'll
make more sense.
Because it's important to listen to the way
he kind of the way this is laid
out.
Oh, shoot. Tell me I got that.
Yeah. There it is.
There's two videos here.
Alright. So here's the first one.
And it's basically one clip, but I just
it's cut up in two. But the point
is he says the stupid white hippies and
and the communist point.
And the voices that you hear out there,
those crazy communists
The people protesting is what he's talking about.
People outside protesting
the federalized police takeover of this area.
Out there,
those crazy communists, they have no roots. They
have no connection to the city. They have
no families there raising this city.
Okay. How could you possibly know that? You're
telling me people in DC who are protesting
the federal takeover of DC
have no connection to DC?
Have no families in DC?
Have no you know, I mean, that's insane.
Yeah. Maybe some of them are somewhere else,
but this guy is so desperately trying to
continue the narrative of, like, the Democrat paid
protester, which by the way is obviously real,
just like the Republican paid protester is obviously
real.
But you must know by now that there's
a ton of people across this country that
are not okay with this left and right
and people who just have a brain. At
the end of the day, all we can
do is call you in a a communist
paid protester
without any evidence to back it up because
this guy hates this country.
They have no connections to the city. They
have no families there raising this city. They
have no one that they're sending to school
in this city. They have no jobs in
this city. They have no connections to this
community at all. But they're the ones who've
been advocating for the 1%.
Oh, really?
See, here's where I think it's interesting. Here's
where he meshes narratives together.
So now you're telling me that the protesters
pushing back against the growing police state are
the ones supporting the 1%?
You are the 1%, man. This game they're
playing where they're the rebels fighting the power
is it's just embarrassing at this point. It's
quite stale.
People see through it. But now
at in in just spectacularly
clumsy fashion, this guy wants you to think
the people protesting against the power structure are
the ones supporting the 1%. In what possible
way could you make that make sense?
The 1%, the the elitist, the technocrats, the
the the oligarchs,
the lobbyists, they're supporting that?
You know why he wants you to think
that? Because he needs you to think this
is the deep state. The ones protesting on
the streets are the ones that were actually
fighting as the rebels.
I'm not joking. This is embarrassing.
Ones who've been advocating for the 1%,
the criminals, the killers, the rapists, the drug
dealers. Okay. But now you're telling me the
rapists and criminals are the 1%? Or are
you saying that the ones protesting out there
are rapists and criminals?
I mean, do you guys just have to
understand how how silly this
is? No matter which one thing you take
it at at one any given moment,
it's embarrassing. He's ridiculous. How could you possibly
know what hundreds of people, if not thousands,
are all you know they're all not one
thing or are one thing. He's just politically
giving you he's just trying to mobilize the
political narrative here.
And that's why this was a little gotcha
moment that he stood there and speak to
a bunch of military that probably think he's
a moron. None of them say anything. They
don't clap. He just gets done talking, and
they just go forward.
That's all it was. It was a it
was a moment to put on TV. That's
what this was. And I'm glad they're here
today because me, Pete, and the vice president
are all gonna leave here. And inspired by
them, we're gonna add thousands more resources
to this city to get the criminals and
the gang members out of here. Great. Okay.
So because Americans are pre are protesting within
their rights, we're gonna bring out more police.
That's what he just said. Wait a minute.
I thought the police were because of the
crime. I thought the police were because of
the unstable Democrat run city, but now you're
telling me we're gonna roll them out as
punishment for you protesting our actions? Yes.
This guy is this guy is either that
stupid or just that brazen. I don't know.
Yep. And ask yourself, why is he even
talking? Why is he even here?
You realize that's a sec I mean, that
that's Pete Hegseth.
Why is he the one talking? Why is
Miller the one always in the front?
It's a good question.
Here's the other one.
So we're gonna ignore these stupid white hippies,
and I'll need to go home and take
a nap because they're all over 90 years
old. Okay. So now they're all
white hippies over 90 years old. Like, you
know, he's obviously being somewhat facetious, but clearly,
this is what they're trying to frame it
as. A bunch of democrat older women who
have no way except at the same time
supporting the 1%,
or they are rapists or they're supporting rapists,
you know, whichever which way you want. They
are whatever you might be thinking right now
you hate. Right? Whatever that is, that's what
they are. Go get them. It's like it's
just so ridiculous.
Then there's the vice president laughing about it.
Why isn't the vice president speaking?
And we're gonna get back to the business
of protecting the American people and the citizens
of Washington nation. Thank you, Steven. Few questions.
His vice president Yeah. Okay. Shut up, Steven.
We're done. Like, nobody even they didn't even
say anything. Like, he's given this big power
of speech, and I'm in control, and everyone
just looked away. I I it's pretty clear
in my opinion that the body language shows
they're like, this guy's a moron.
I mean, anybody who's not like completely emotional
and partisan driven is gonna listen to that
and go, well, that's just dumb. I mean,
these people I mean, some of them probably
know something. They probably family lives here. It's
just silly.
But this is what works for them. Now
here's what the article says. White House aide
Stephen Miller has embarked on an unhinged rant
about stupid white hippies who have inspired him
to bring more troops into the nation's capital.
You know, just like everybody was a Hamas
supporting terrorist who recognized a genocide. Right? The
same kind of hyperbolic
broad framing that just gets you to think
one thing.
During the bizarre PR stunt at Union Station
to highlight Donald Trump's crime crackdown,
Miller lashed out at crowds who had gathered
to protest against the pickle.
That's what happened.
Speaking alongside vice president and
defense secretary Pete Hegseth,
the deputy White House chief of staff, which
is what he is, by the way, so
again, ask you why he is speaking right
there,
told reporters he was glad the protesters had
come because me and Pete and vice president
are all gonna leave here and inspired by
them, we're going to add more resources.
That's what he said. We're gonna use your
legally protected act to rationalize more police.
Pretty self explanatory.
Not because of crime, but because look. Here's
the best way to frame it. That's why
they're there.
We are shutting you down. We are showing
you who's in control, and we're slowly taking
over this country. And if you stand up
and protest, well, we're gonna come after you.
I mean, here here's a good clip to
play right there.
This is not the first time Trump has
brought this up, guys.
Big on Saturday. We're gonna have a lot
of and if there's any protest that wants
to come out, they will be met with
very big force, by the way. And for
those people that wanna protest, they're gonna be
met with very big force. And I haven't
even heard about a protest,
but, you know, this is, people that hate
our country,
but they will be met with very heavy
force.
That's it. There's no out of context there.
If you protest, you'll be met with force.
Hey, freedom, constitutional rights, guys. Love Trump.
It's it's sad.
I just hate to it's just disappointing, to
be honest, that there are anybody out there
who tries to pretend like they care about
these things and supports what this person is
saying, or any of them, by the way.
He says, so we're going to ignore these
stupid white hippies and all need to go
home to take a nap because we're all
over 90 years old, and we're going to
get back to the business of protecting the
American people and citizens of Washington.
Aaron Melnick points out
or first, this is, Alania Treen saying, Trump
says he's hoping just to raise $2,000,000,000
from congress to beautify Washington, DC, says they'll
give great asphalt.
They'll be beautified. What does that sound like
to you? Do you think they're gonna spend
$2,000,000,000 on asphalt and streets? No. They're building
out the police state. They're building out the
smart city, Freedom City epicenter is what it
feels like to me. We already talked about
the Peter Thiel overlapped all this, the Freedom
City point, which tomorrow I'm gonna talk more
about.
$2,000,000,000. That's just what they're talking about, but
you see where this goes. Erin Melnick points
out, reminder again, congress outright stole $1,000,000,000
in taxpayer dollars from DC earlier this year
under Trump's administration.
We're taking taxpayer money that people in DC
paid for local services,
but due to a budget quirk during the
continuing resolution,
I'm sure what a quirk, right,
Congress took it away from DC. So let's
pretend like this is totally not coincidence, okay?
Or rather I should have said that wrong.
Like it's let's pretend this is coincidence.
You're telling me that right before the the
continuing resolution, the gap,
all weird things that happened,
they essentially use that to steal a billion
dollars from a place they then federalize.
Guys, this is either stealing from the people
of DC while framing you're helping them, or
there's something bigger than this happening. I just
think it's very weird. Overall,
you're watching money move, and it's hurting the
people of DC while they pretend they're fighting
for them. Nothing new if you're paying attention.
True street media.
Metro Transit Police says last night during a
fair enforcement at Navy Yard Station, the Metro
Police stopped a 28 year old for fraudulent
use of a kids ride free card, how
dare he, which is intended for DC students
aged five to 21.
Misuse of these fare cards is fair evasion
and will not be tolerated. Get that sandwich
thrower. The real criminals today. Right?
True story media. They tackled a woman to
the ground,
maced her in the face, put her in
cuffs, and detained her over checks notes on
the burgeoning Aurelian police state, a $50
civil citation for fare evasion.
That's what's going on. That's what they're posting
about.
Guys, that's
I was just shocking.
And so they're literally going after people like
this and claiming they're stopping the worst of
the crime. This is no different than we
saw in LA. We saw around immigration, this
whole country. What we're seeing around Israel, the
protests.
It's not new. It's the continuation of the
same plan.
But here's Nick Sorter doing his cheerleading tap
dance. Oh my god. Look at DC. It's
totally great now
because of this one video of nobody in
the streets. It shows you everything's great. Right?
It shows you a ghost town, more like
it. But it says DC streets that are
regularly overrun by youths
who terrorize the community, which
there's a lot of places where you have
a nightlife that very clearly does that, which
is not good, either good, nor bad. It's
something you can talk about. There should be
there should be police that engage with this.
My point is that using those problems anywhere
in this country to roll out a police
state should be the very thing that a
supposed constitutionalist
Republican like Nick pretends to be should care
about or whatever he pretends to be, somebody
fighting for Trump's administration.
You're supposed to be the ones telling us
you're fighting to bring back the the law
the law and order and the constitution,
and you're literally cheering on police force
to
allegedly make things more safe. Do you not
understand what liberty for safety means? Do you
even know about the constitution?
The point is trust of thought comes in
and says people aren't going out because no
one wants to be tackled by metro transit
police on power trips or private military contractors
who think they're at war. This is not
stopping crime. It's killing DC's
economic economy and isolating its people.
Nick jumps in and says, name a single
incident of someone being tackled by any sort
of cop in DC that wasn't committing a
crime. Just one. It's people like you who
are attempting to instill fear. Oops.
Oh, well, here's four examples.
Checks notes? Yeah. Oh, he didn't respond. How
funny that is. Give me one example. Oops.
I'll just shut up and run away and
pretend like it didn't happen.
Great journalism, bud.
Well, here's an example of exactly what she's
talking about or just more illegal action, whether
it's tackling somebody or not.
US Capitol Police
and ICE, because you see it's the same
thing, arrest a billboard truck driver who is
protesting Gaza famine.
Right. Not illegal? No. No. No. Not illegal.
Breaking the law? No. Not then I can
tell.
Here they are, though. The driver was arrested.
The truck was towed near NBC office at
400 Cap North Capitol Street.
Site of the four week media encampment on
Gaza, the truck displayed a message about Israel's
ongoing famine in Gaza featuring president Trump's recent
statement. Quote, children in Gaza face real starvation.
This is an alarming crackdown on free speech.
Right? So what they do? They stopped him.
They they took him out of the car,
and they shut him down. They arrested him,
took him
away. That's in Trump's America right there. Right?
That's Trump's break DC crackdown.
What is it about a billboard truck driver
that is somehow against the law? Well, one
probably using Trump's term phrase that he is
kinda biting him in the butt right now.
We'll get to that tomorrow.
Israel.
I mean, look, guys, if you're gonna be
honest about this, this is completely within the
realm of free speech. Like, this is him
expressing his opinion on the side of his
own car, and you're gonna arrest him for
that? Why? Because this is what it's really
about.
Control, narrative control,
life control, like, literally engineering the way we
react and respond, especially when it comes to
a very certain power.
But this is the reality, guys. So you're
gonna tell me Nick's order this is this
is okay with you? Why? Because he's making
it safer for Israel?
Hashtag winning.
Well, here's Trump telling you that this is
going to go even further, which is exactly
what we were telling you to begin with.
Trump says he's cleaning up DC with the
National Guard. He'll now move to another location
stating Chicago will be next and then New
York.
I mean, it's one it's one of those
moments, guys. We told you this was coming.
It wasn't hard to see that this was
coming.
And I simply said, here's Benny Johnson doing
the same thing. They're all, yay. Author totalitarianism.
Only budding authoritarians and partisan sycophants are cheering
this on at this point, guys, or those
too blind to see the obvious. If you're
cheering this now but would be screaming martial
law if it was Biden, Obama, or anybody
with the d by their name, then you're
a hypocrite and you're part of the problem.
But sadly, most of them are teams for
politics, and they know that and don't care.
Arthur says moped delivery moped delivery drivers disappearing
from DC streets under Trump's police takeover, which
is looking more and more like an immigration
crackdown than anything else.
And Aaron says the federal takeover of DC
law enforcement should be seen as more about
recreating what happened in Los Angeles than about
addressing street crime.
Roughly half of all and this guy this
guy,
you look into his account for yourself, you'll
note the one thing he's consistent, which is
why I point to him is that he
backs up what he says with data, with
direct source material every time. What happened in
Los Angeles about it says roughly half of
all arrests in the last week have been
immigration
arrests,
a huge swath of which are delivery drivers.
They're taking low hanging fruit like they are
everywhere else and then convincing people they're saving
DC by arresting people that are delivering pizzas.
Seven states approved national guard troops to support
immigration attention operations.
It expands.
Broad news alert says national guard troops are
preparing to deploy across 19 states to support
DHS in a sweeping crackdown on immigration
and federal crimes. Funny how they just mashed
it together now. Right? Who cares? Whatever the
narrative is today, police state, for your safety,
of course. Just like Greg Reese put the
clip out recently, police state for your safety.
It's exactly what they're doing.
It's just one of those unfortunate I told
you so moments, guys. Remember, this is what
they said you were never going to happen
because Trump's not gonna do that, and then
it happens and now they're cheering on for
why it should happen.
Pentagon plan. This is on top. This came
out on the August 12, guys.
Pentagon plan would create military reaction force for
civil unrest. What does that mean to them
today? Protesting.
You've heard him say it over and over.
The Trump administration is evaluating lands that would
establish a, quote, domestic civil disturbance quick reaction
force
composed of hundreds of national guard troops, who,
by the way, will be there forever now
because military presence forever for your safety,
with rapidly deploying
tasked with rapidly deploying into American cities facing
protests, because those are now illegal apparently, or
other unrest because protests are unrest. Right? According
to Internet internal Pentagon documents reviewed by Washington
Post. Welcome to your future. Thanks a lot,
Nick Sorder, Benny Johnson, all the rest. Thank
you for cheering on your police state. I'm
sure you'll benefit wildly up until you go
to jail. At the end of the day,
guys, this is an ongoing reality. A quick
reaction force is not some temporary thing. He's
talking about national or just whatever presence they
install being something that is now on there
going forward. You roll out a a protest,
they'll rationalize why that one guy's violent. It's
all a crime. Shut it down forever.
We all see this left and right.
On top of that,
earlier this evening, this is the second time
I've seen this, agents from ICE and other
federal agencies, because it's all just kinda meshed
together now, in Rhode Island,
the metro the in metro in DC or
outside Rhode Island, excuse me, metro in DC
asking police exiting their station for their IDs
per someone who experienced it. When the person
presented their real ID,
an agent said that wasn't sufficient.
Look at that.
The real ID pushed. They tried to push
on everybody that Jones pretends didn't happen, but
it's still very much there.
Not enough. But I thought that was the
old point. Wasn't that supposed to be a
universe? Now they just need you to be
digital. That's what it's about. And he says,
we apparently haven't entered the we have apparently
entered the papers, please stage of Trump's takeover
of DC.
True Street Media points out the marshal services
that say in an effort to make DC
safe again, the US marshals announces a $500
reward for tips that lead to arrest in
Washington DC. Scan the QR code, which should
be like a never ever ever thing for
you, by the way. Never. My point, though,
DC make it safe again by
telling on your neighbor. See something, say something.
Isn't that Republicans that used to make fun
of Democrats for doing that? Funny how it
always comes back around.
Wow. Even the freaking Stasi didn't offer 500
reward bonuses to their informants, says TrueStreet Media.
Way to innovate by using our tax dollars
taxpayer dollars to get us further to further
enslave ourselves.
Here's,
Tim Dillon that says, they've already got the
military in the streets, FEMA camps, Palantir monitoring
us. If this doesn't scare you, you're nuts.
I agree. And he says, this is everything
Alex Jones warned about, even conspiracy theorist' wet
dream. And I agree with David Ike. He
goes, yes. Alex did warn about this and
I before him. But now he's promoting the
man who's doing it while I'm still calling
out more than thirty years later. I mean,
it's funny that Tim Dillon would make this
point. Like, are you unaware that he's literally
cheering on these things or downplaying Palantir?
It's kinda silly, isn't it? And the point
is, yes, whether he pointed it or not
is not the same as him now ushering
it in. It's the whole Bill Cooper point,
guys. If Bill Cooper in the time Jones
was trying to kinda grift off the nine
11 information that Cooper was correct about, that
Jones basically sip siphoned from,
when Cooper came out and said Jones was
a grifting lying manipulator
before he was suspiciously
whatever happened to Cooper?
How does that not show you or everybody
else who's left? We just talked to Reese
in the interview. David Knight says the same.
Everybody who's ever worked, he tells you they're
manipulators,
lying, not checking their sources. It's everywhere you
look. The point is that you can point
these things out because maybe you knew or
maybe you knew then for other point is
when it matters,
the the North American Union, whatever it is,
people are pulling their punches. And that's whether
they changed over the years or not. It's
the moment of truth. Now is what matters.
Now we can actually do something. We could
have done something before, but we can see
it. We can marshal our resources and push
back on this, and they're the ones that
are trying to distract you every which way
you look.
Should be pretty clear by now.
And I mean, there's plenty. We're gonna get
into more stuff tomorrow, like, around Venezuela.
Like, it's it's crazy. Sal, the Agra is
plenty of people are like, what happened to
this man? Gentleman's just now cheering on the
takeover of Venezuela.
But back to this point, Jason Bassler says,
what's happening in DC isn't law and order.
It's martial law wrapped in patriotism and platitudes.
Fear has fear has been engineered, amplified, weaponized,
and is now mobilizing MAGA for a war
they've been waiting to fight. Pay attention.
History is repeating itself.
And I'll leave you with a great point
from Carrie. At this point, and this is
not like an ultimatum.
It's just that, look, this is
so self evident.
What's going on? Again, whether you think they've
got good intentions or not, whether you want,
like, the outcome they're pointing to or not,
the actions are wrong.
It is completely counter to what you claim
you're fighting for and point to fact won't
come back. They will not give this power
back. They never do. So the point is
that with that being so obvious,
at this point, Trump supporters can either admit
they've got duped by a manipulative politician who
promised revolutionary change but has done little more
than fill the swamp, prop up the technocracy,
and gaslight people in Epstein,
peace, and many other issues, or
admit they are rabid authoritarians who care far
more about the illusion of power, control, and
safety than they ever valued freedom.
Excuse me.
Then give him a chance grace period should
have been over a year ago or the
the give him a chance grace period should
have been over years ago, but it's indisputably
expired now.
I agree.
100%.
I just hope people can find the courage
to be honest about this with themselves.
It is everywhere you look.
So we'll leave it there today. I'll see
you tomorrow. Have a lot to catch up
on as well. I'm sure there'll be plenty
of more stories that swing up tomorrow that
make the show even longer than I want
it to be, but we'll get there tomorrow
and talk about plenty. I hope you share
this people. Hope you talk about this people.
Alright? Have conversations about the information.
Print out the source material, like the real
source material, not just my show, the source
material. The data points that you can prove
and research and
and discuss.
Please do that. It's so important to have
this conversation, you know, especially when you disagree
with somebody, and then do your best to
make sure it's amicable. It's okay to disagree,
but talk about it.
Critically think about it. Don't just take people's
narratives because everywhere you look right now, people
are trying to manipulate you. Question us, question
them, question everybody.
Thank you for being here. As always, question
everything. Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. From
the President's Office in the White House in
Washington, DC, we present an address by the
president of The United States, Dwight d Eisenhower.
In holding scientific
research and discovery in respect,
as we should,
we must also be alert to the equal
and opposite danger
that public policy
could itself
become the captive of a scientific
technological
elite.