It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 08/17/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Have a
little bit of a special setup for you
today. Steve Foykin is gonna be joining us
from AM Wake Up. Really had limited time
today. Supposed to be on Jimmy Dore's show
tonight
at around 6PM. I don't know if that's
live or not. I imagine it is. Didn't
have a lot enough time to really get
organized the way I usually do. So I
but I wanted to make sure we got
some something some content out today for you
know? And and we'll go over plenty of
stuff, But I invited Steve on so we
can kinda bat some ideas back and forth.
Maybe, you know, really as with us together,
we could end up going in any direction
possible. But we things that I've kinda lined
up today are some different things I was
seeing, the interesting overlap of a few conversations
around Nova Scotia,
glyphosate,
you know, lack of freedom in regard to
being able to go in the woods, really
weird overlapping stories.
Some other stuff I wanted to touch on
on, you know, some partisan conversations I thought
were kinda relevant.
And and I really wanted to highlight some
more developments around I did a show called
the
technocratic tiptoe, which was really kinda based on
a presentation that I gave for a local
CHD meeting.
And now, apparently,
Katha reached out to me today and wants
me to do a version of it for
some legislative report for the Solari report, which
I'm honored to do. And so I'm just
glad to see that it's a you know,
I felt like it was a good kind
of juxtaposition of a lot of information.
Today, there's some interesting follow ups that I
wanted to make sure you saw, both on
the tech kind of the technocracy
control grid side, but unfortunately on the vaccine
side as well or whatever you wanna call
flu mist or these overlapping things. AstraZeneca, of
course, with the new infrastructure they built in
this country, thank you Donald Trump or just
the US government,
and the flu mist and its shedding
conversation and all these different points around it
that I think are really relevant. And we
should go over these things as well and
maybe some points on Washington
DC, immigration potentially. I've got plenty of opinions.
Israel, there's plenty to go into. But, we'll
start with some partisan stuff because it's always
fun to call out the absurdity of what
we're seeing out there today. What's up? What's
going on, Steve? Thanks for joining me, brother.
Oh, you're very welcome, man. Hope you're doing
good. Happy Sunday, everybody.
Yes, sir. I'll I'll actually put the chat
on there as well. Like, you know, almost
we should almost just maybe
find an a new version of something like
this to do as opposed to just doing
it under the daily wrap up, you know,
banner. But might be fun to try. You
know, how do you do this when you're
on the show? I can't really see those
very closely because it's small on the screen,
so I'm not sure where you look. But
we should try Oh, I look on the
the side crawler instead of the private chat.
It's the shows the comments on the right
hand side. For now. Something in particular that,
like, catches my eyes sometimes, I'll put them
up on screen.
Yeah. Okay. Nice. I see that. So the
point is today, guys, that since this is
more of an informal
you know, that might be fun to engage
with some of the comments. If you guys
have something that, you know, adds to the
conversation, we could bring it in. And I
believe that's,
yeah. Okay. Nice. Haven't done that before, so
that's awesome.
But yeah. So let's let's just get get
right into some of the partisan stuff that
I think is really interesting. And, you know,
one thing I'll actually say before we get
into it, like, today, especially,
which I'm it's probably funny how people could
probably know whether or not what I'm my
plan is for the day based on how
I engage on social media. Like, when I
have less, like, less time to get into,
like, the real research, I end up falling
into I hate that I do it. I
I I get, like,
mad at myself every time I get into,
like, the arguments online, but I still always
think there's value to it in some cases.
You know, like, whether it's a bot or
someone who's not gonna change their mind, I
feel like people look at these sometimes and
they can gain from it, but not when
it's like this ang you know, back and
forth, which, you know, I fall for it
like anybody can or fall into it. My
point in saying all that is that I
was today arguing a lot about
about, you know, like, I made a comment,
the Homeland Security account on Twitter. We was
just saying the most ridiculous things. Like, they're
just, it's so small the way they present
themselves now. And it wasn't about the partisanship.
Right? It was about I just simply said,
I'm just, you know, embarrassed by how small
and petty. You know, they're making these little
memes and and calling out individuals and making
little snide jokes about people. I'm like, show
some decorum. Like, this is the whole not
like I I have respect for them or
the government in general, but, like, at least
have some decorum for the position, the power
that you hold. And so I called them
out for that. And then just got railed
with comments of people going, like, attacking the
the substance as if I was saying that
people shouldn't be arrested. It was just very
strange. My point in all of that is,
you know, I think personally that the partisan
side of this right now is completely inverted.
Like, in a sense where the people that
thought they were trolling everybody,
right, like, thirty seconds ago, are super emotionally
unstable and super concerned, and they're not really
sound with their position. And so it's easy
to sort of troll them right now in
ways that I almost feel guilty in doing.
So, like, you get in these conversations with
them and it's just easy to break down
how ridiculous and one-sided and and, like, subjective
and assumptive their points are. But, you know,
I shouldn't be doing it. It's wasting my
time. But do you get the same kind
of sense with, like, what's going on with
all the partisan conversation?
Oh, for sure.
And I see it play out, you know,
when I do more, like, normie shows and
stuff like that where it's just
it it's
it is a complete one eighty
from,
you know, Dunkin' on the libs
to
now you're the one with the bag of
salty tears, and everybody else is going, hey.
Are you sure that's what you voted for?
And they're
hyperreacting
to it in the exact same fashion because
it's just the opposite side of that coin.
Right. And do this every always
when their guy is in power and it
turns out that he's
just a puppet for the establishment
and does exactly what actual power wants him
to do
all day every day twice on Sunday. Right.
And it's not like either of us are
saying that that, you know it like, my
our point is always is the people in
the partisan mindset, not every single person, but
more the team sport politics side, there that
that's that describes all of them. You know,
the way that they respond. But what's funny
is so now you got the right or
the ones sort of in the main sphere
of it or if they're like, they're the
easiest ones to see as being hypocritical right
now. Right? Where the left is sort of
you know, they're doing the same things as
they always have but are in you know,
almost joining in with the jumping out. You
know, it's just this weird inversion of it
all. And I almost wonder why it's not
you know, if I was in that position,
even if I thought I was entirely right
and my guy is the one, wouldn't you
like, how do you not start having some
self reflection? You know, I just it's just
it's not even worth talking about because it's
like I I wonder whether these people are
all, you know, the dead Internet thing or,
like, the you know, that half the Internet's
bots. Like, how do you truly even know
what you're dealing with? But it's just interesting.
You know? So I get lucky to be
all But I think you've touched on a
lot of it because when you lash out,
you're in a hyper emotional
state because
you can't
process
the reality
of having to own up usually to your
own choices or your own decisions and take
any accountability,
and that's where yeah, the outburst comes from.
So I think if it is a genuine
human being, a lot of that is just
basic knee jerk redirect
Yeah. Or assuming that, you know, you know,
not attacking the substance of your point, but,
you know, going, well, you don't want illegals
arrested, some nonsensical,
you know, third grade, second grade level retort
that you usually only get from the Hasbara
trolls. But now
because it's overlapped so much with the Trump
administration,
It's one in the same as far as
the argument goes.
And it's so it's it's almost like they
come from any either of them or even
even all of us at some point from
the position that it's like, well, you know,
I'm I'm I'm righteous in my stance because
they're the ones that put us in this
position. And it's like, that's not even necessarily
inaccurate. Right? But it's like it's, you know,
like, I I think we all fall into
that. We're like, I'll be online, and you
start getting bombarded and you start responding to
everybody as if they're all in that position,
almost like Like, these are things that we
all have to think about. You know? We
all fall into this stuff. You know? And
it's it's just so interesting, like, psychologically, and
you wonder how much of this is completely
by design. You know? I I and in
on that note, I I you I don't
know if you saw the image I used
today for the show.
Almost kind of in that same light just
kind of because here's what's funny in my
mindset for this. This is these are both
AI images people put out. Mhmm. We had
just the other show, I talked about the
one of the, I think it was Mary
Talley Bowden trying to get the Trump image
with the mRNA in the and they wouldn't
let her do it. It was, like, content
moderated. Somebody was able to do it, and
somebody sent me the picture. And I just
think so it's just funny. And then overlap
with Trump, you know, they always put them
out with him like god guiding him, and
there's Epstein. It's just a funny picture. You
know? And it's and it's today is, you
know, we're we're more informal about it. What's
funny is
that this is I would laugh equally if
it was Obama or Biden or Trump or
anybody. Right? And and you know we both
agree on that. And so it's just funny
that people respond already seeing responses like Trump
derangement syndrome. You guys just hate him so
much. And it's like, well, probably in some
ways, but just as much as all the
rest of them in government. You know? It's
just an interesting thing. But let let let's
talk about
some of the partisan point that I think
are interesting. Just quickly, send me that send
me the original image of the the Trump
with Epstein thing, and I'll put Bill Clinton
next to him. Yeah.
Yeah. There you go. It can be, you
know, Epstein looking over both Bill and Donnie,
and it'll be bipartisan.
Yeah. Exactly. But, you know, then it gets
entirely ignored. Where it's like, at least when
it's at least it gets some some people
seeing it, but not like these things are
necessarily the most important. But, you know, it
does it's I think it's important that we
always question the especially the people that we
think are doing the right thing. But I
saw this going around still, and I think
this is so interesting. Like, even jumping at
momentarily to this, they're still pushing, like, this
whole, you know, bombshell FBI around, you know,
Clinton, around even going back to, like, a
pay to play thing I always bring up
or any of these stuff, and there's no
action around it. So he Jones comes comes
out saying Hillary is now kissing Trump's a
s s because she knows grand jury investigations
are now live and, you know, the same
ones that are really
historically
you know, around these people very rarely, if
ever, end up in anything, you know, happening.
He says, hell freezes over. Hillary Clinton praises
Trump. Now you've seen this probably. I think
I've got it somewhere in here where Clinton
is praising Trump. Maybe not up here. Right?
Where, you know Yeah. I just can't I
can't what she's saying here, I forget. We
can actually download it. We can watch it
real quick. I don't have anything downloaded either.
But the the point is that she's saying,
you know, positive things, and I have seen
a couple of these going around. And so
the only way you can frame that is
that she's desperate and scared and, you know,
and as you can see what I put
on it, you know, it's one big club
and and you ain't in it. And I
simply said, what a clownish way to frame
this. What about when he said they're good
people, which he did, or recently admitted he's
happy he let her off the hook? What
about when all the globalists were at Trump's
inauguration or when Gates met with Trump and
he was excited about the vaccine direction? You
know, it's just are they all super scared,
or is it just clear that they're all
working in the same direction? That's just obviously
what I think. It's just very weird to
me that you know? But the point is
that they're all very clearly trying to kinda
create the narrative around what appears to be
all of them
working toward the same goals. Right? I mean,
how do you read that?
Well, so we played the clip multiple times
over the years at Trump at the Al
Smith dinner where he goes, I call her
beautiful Hillary now. And, like, well, all that
kind of stuff. And that was immediately after
the election
where he was like, oh, we're good friends.
You know? We're just screwing around. Whatever. I
mean, hey. You know me. I'm Donnie. I
like to play. You know? And that was
that was basically his whole take on it.
So this just underscores all of that.
And still to this day, their daughters are
best friends.
They're all, you know, happily raising orthodox grandchildren
that go to the same, you know, super
expensive private school,
in Manhattan. I mean, it's just it's ridiculous
to
sit here in 2025
and view this as anything other than WWE.
Oh, you're muted, brother.
And as we keep talking about, you know,
I you wonder
what that real that number is. I think
everyone can sense that it's just not what
it usually is. Like, people are super skeptical
about a lot of this. But, you know,
it's like I they it's
cartoonish is the word, obviously, because that's it
just I don't know. It's it is insanely
obvious that these people are out there doing
jumping jacks and clapping and cheerleading about things
that are diametric opposites of what they were
told. You know? And I just think that
it's very clear that people are starting to
see through this entirely. And day by day,
it becomes more and more obvious. And I
think things like
are clear about that. Encouraged,
by the events of the last several months.
First of all, the NATO commitment,
by individual member states to increase their defense
spending,
is very welcome. It's something that prior administrations
have certainly,
sought, and I think it's great that we
are seeing these commitments that now have to
be followed through on.
The willingness of European countries to support Ukraine,
and by doing so, buy American,
weapons in order to provide them to the
Ukrainians.
I think all of that is a very,
good signal that
there is beginning to be a better understanding
both by the president and the people around
him as well as by, the leaders of
our European,
allies
that there can be,
common ground,
amongst us.
And the kind of
dismissiveness
that we saw in the first Trump administration
has been replaced by a much more,
obvious working relationship,
to the good of European security, transatlantic security,
and hopefully,
Ukrainian security.
So I'm actually
encouraged.
Yeah. So, you know, it's clear that she
is
I like where this is going. Trump is
seeing the light. Right? He was bad before.
Now he's doing it. Well, what really changed?
Right? What in other than narrative and statements,
what in what materially changed? We can see
before, you know, the support for this. Now
the war time frame, you know, clearly overlooked
twenty twenty two, right, into now, so there's
no you don't get to know the point
is this has been going on long before
if we understand the reality of what's been
happening in Ukraine. Through Trump's last administration and
well back in, what,
Operation
Aerodynamic,
nineteen was it '48, if I'm correct? Right?
You know? They've been stoking and fomenting
fascist entities just like they did with the
Mujahideen. Like, this is not new information, you
know, and even she's brought that up. And
so it's just very interesting that that's the
case as she's now saying we're you know,
do you think this is them beginning to
highlight the fact that they are gonna work
together? Like, because how can you spend this
as a positive thing other than do what
Jones is doing? That she's secretly freaking out.
It's just very interesting. Well, I
look. Every time you get somebody from the
Clinton camp or the Obama camp that comes
out and praises Trump, it's always because
he's doing something militarily.
Women always doing something that seriously
expands their portfolios.
Mhmm. And so and then Hillary Clinton's never
met a war she didn't like. She, you
know, probably is very, very stoked too that,
US troops are now on the border,
with Iran
going through Azerbaijan
and that safety security corridor,
you know, because that has shades of Ukraine
as well
Mhmm. In terms of how that's shaping up
and, like, positioning and posture and, you know,
constantly threatening Iran with troop movements and, you
know, movement of material that's pointed at their
country and stuff. So,
yeah, you you can see the escalation
build
up month by month and the expansion of,
you know, US boots on the ground month
by month in Trump two point o, and
that does make you know, effectively
Hillary Clinton's in the o con. Yeah. I
did neoliberal get tossed around a lot of
it. Well, she's, you know, cut from the
same cloth. It's the same thing. I mean,
look. It's like this is where we this
frustrates me the whole even NeoLib, NeoCon point.
Right? It's like, okay. At the end of
the day, we're still using, like, these
like what would be the
defining difference between those two? Right? What? Their
political leanings when it comes to the wedge
issues we discussed? You know what I mean?
Like, at the end of the day, it's
still an authority. Like, that's what's I think
we can recognize, and I think that's even
become an important point for people that are
aware of the nonpartisan or the, you know,
the the illusion of the partisanship that that
it they're too you know, it's like the
left and the right of this conversation, two
wings of the same bird, kind of the
same thing. You know? And so, clearly, I
think all of them, whether they know it
or not, have been in the same path
for a long time. I but I'm of
the mind that Trump and Clinton, especially our
people, if any of them, are aware of
that. You know? You know? Like, let's not
forget. They're related, which is a weird thing
to not point out in a regular basis,
and on the idea that they were the
only two that were on that stage, and
that's always the way this goes. That's not
a conspiracy theory. It's, what, the most royal
theory. Now regardless of why you think it's
happening and if that theory has any legitimacy,
it is something you can easily verify for
yourself. It's the weirdest thing. Like, it even
got some weird attention way in, like, the,
what, the nineties when some young girl did,
like, this whole sprawling report for school? No.
It was during
Obama because he was included in the related
to everybody, but it was probably 02/2009,
maybe 02/2009. I thought it was earlier than
that. But either way, the point is that
it got, like, a lot of attention because
some you know, and people are like, what?
Like, it's when you see it and you
look at it now the argument is that,
you know, the what is the claim, like,
the name for it? And they basically that
there's the bloodline is very broad and ultimately
over the years become really easy. But then,
okay, if that's the case, then why isn't
most of if by that logic, then 75%
of them every time should be in that
category on the stage. They're not. Yeah. It's
almost always only two. You know, at the
end of the day, if you don't know
what we're talking about, it's the idea that
at at any election we've had going back
as far as you wanna look, I think,
save for a very few one or two
anomalies in it all, that they tie back
to what, like, Charlemagne or one other king,
the bloodline.
And that's easy to look up. Now, yes,
you could argue that it's sprawling and you
know? But if if every time you only
ultimately have two of them that are in
that and they end up being the two
that are the final two on the stage,
so it ends up being either one of
them or that, Meh, maybe that's just all
coincidence. I can easily consider that, but that
seems
pretty hard to wrap your mind around mathematically,
but it's very interesting. So the point is
that they are too. And I think that
what people are right now more than ever
beginning to see is the the or, you
know, just, I guess, in an in an
abstract way, they're seeing the strings.
Right? They're starting to see this whole thing,
and it's not just Israel. It's not just
COVID. It's like, man, you know, like, we
keep talking about what isn't part of this
whole manipulation. You know? It's very I don't
know if you wanted to grab it or
not, but I did throw the the link
to that news report with the girl and
the president in the chat.
Oh, okay. Nice. Let me grab let me
see. How old is it that it say
on there? Fifteen years. 15?
Yeah.
I don't I'm not gonna download it, but
I just wanna bring it up. We can
look at it. Yeah. Yeah. That's the one.
Yeah. With that whole that whole circle graph
and all that.
Yep. Yeah. We'll include this. You guys can
check it out. There. She's right there. Yeah.
That's so wild. This is so weird. It's
just, you know, it's so basic.
You know? And you wonder it's I think
it is people have a tendency to want
to dismiss
something that oh, I didn't show it. I'm
sorry. That, that people want to dismiss something
that just kinda challenges their worldview or challenges
what they you know, something that's, oh, that's
just crazy. We have we're primed in this
country to reflexively dismiss what doesn't fit into
what we're told is supposed to be. But
that's that might that is the kind of
abstract thing I think people are starting to
break apart from right now. You know, not
just that they're questioning things, but, like, that
whole like,
you know, almost in a way, it's because
we're we're being driven into some new kind
of social engineering dynamic, and it's, like, breaking
the old model. That might be one way
to look at it. It's interesting. Mhmm. But,
back to Ukraine before we move past that,
I just wanna point these things out. You
know, Adam, you know,
the count online that's,
when did he come back? Forget where he
comes from. He's very adamant about against Israel.
He says, the cofounder of Ukraine's not Nazi
Azov Battalion, sir, Serp, serviced in in the
Israeli IDF. Are you surprised? Now the point
is this is not new information. As you
guys know, we've talked about this going back
a long way. The idea that, you know,
the the overlap
of of the Israeli funding of the Azov
movement, the reality that this has been something
that's been cultivated. Like I said a second
ago, this is from 1948.
There's CIA documents that show you that and
the overlap of, like, the what was it?
The the what's his name? The guy who
ran the one plus one TV station who
who who basically hired Kolomoisky. Kolomoisky. Thank you.
He all was also the head of the
World Jewish Congress, who also was the financial
backer of the Azov movement as well as
the TV station, you know, and was very
clearly aligned with Israel. Well, like, you know,
it's just such a way it's just all
these things are that clear. You know? And
so then this one too, just on the
on the point these things out for people,
and I'll include these as always the, like,
Whitney's article, Ukraine or the new Al Qaeda.
Like, this is what this was really about.
But this question to Putin, then then let's
talk briefly about the whole potential peace deal.
Mister Putin, will you commit come commit to
not killing any more civilians? And, I mean,
it's easy to actually break down the comparison
to Gaza. Right? And that's why she says,
did any American reporter ask Netanyahu this question?
You know what? It's very weird the way
this is going. So, I mean, do you
think there's going to be anything
about, you know, any traction
that ends up you know, I'll leave it
at that with what they're talking about. Yeah.
Yeah. Because it the they're
over,
they're over Cokie Smurf.
They they are. They're done with them. He's
ran his course. He's a problem.
I I think that as the the globalist
project moves forward,
it's going to become more and more realistic
that the the quote, unquote big club includes
China and Russia Yeah.
And Iran for that matter.
All of them are building,
you know,
biodigital
platforms
for which life
all existence
derives.
We'll talk about that today in a minute.
You know, they they all have varying degrees
of, yeah, intensive digital surveillance,
I'll have varying degrees
of,
you know, descent crushing surveillance,
and censorship
as far as that goes, various different platforms.
So I I think
the project is and always has been,
you know, a a
universal government, one world government with just districts.
And I feel like the bricks versus west
thing
is just,
would you like your fascism with mac and
cheese and mashed potatoes, or would you like
it with, you know, some nice pico
over a spread of rice and beans? Would
you like it with naan? How would you
like your tyranny? Well, you know, for me
yeah. And I agree. But what's interesting is,
as always, and I think I'm sure I
I would I think you'd agree with this,
that, obviously, we should hope, like, we would
hope Donald Trump might be better than he
is or that Biden might be any of
them. Right? We should always hope that the
people who wanna believe in them, that they
are right because that would mean good for
everybody at least, you know, in most cases
because there are some pretty ridiculous people out
there. But my point though is that we
should hope that maybe bricks is some genuine
thing that is trying to change it. You
know, but then but always be skeptical of
every move, question it, you know, and be
ready to call out the same things we're
seeing here. You know? But I agree with
you. I think that it's really obvious you
can see that the people involved, in most
cases, just want their own powers, their their
own version of that, or if not, are
all on the same team doing that for
a transition of power.
But they're all of their declarations
when they meet every year. They throw it
to
UN sustainable development goals, IMF policy,
World Bank this, and it it's all the
same.
It's just served different to different cultures.
I agree. No. I trust me. I you're
not that that's I I'm You know, that's
You know, one more thing when it comes
down to government. Like, I'm never gonna be
that's what's so easy. That's why it's frustrating
for people to try to come at us
about these things because it's like, look. I
do not support any politician. I'll point out
and that's I've said that many times. Even
Thomas Massie, for example. Not because that's not
possible or it's not I'm not maybe in
the future, but right now, until Thomas Massie
gives me, you know, let's just say another
year solid of nonstop and then still a
question every single movie ever does for the
rest of his life because that's what we
should all do. But I'm just so jaded
when it comes to any of them or
government. Right? So anyone in the world anywhere,
any politician, any government, I'm not gonna be
that's what you know, I'm gonna call them
out. I'm gonna say that might have been
a good move, but people can't wrap their
mind around that who are invested in my
guy versus your guy. Right? This government first
ask government. They just can't it's just a
binary way the world works, but that's what's
so important. So with bricks, yes. I'm with
you. I think, you know, even let's just
even put it this way. Even if they
were genuinely trying to make a that, you
know, let's just say the the the t
the people involved,
Moe, it wanted this to be something positive
for freedom, there will always be people involved
who are secretly trying to do something else.
You know, as as, Bruce Fine on on
the Bitch You podcast or, you know, somebody
else who just said that, by the way,
too.
I mean, even even RFK junior told us,
you know, people in power lie. You know?
Bruce Fine's point is that look. There no
matter where you look, any politician has ulterior
motives. They're not doing this for you. They're
not doing this for the country. Even if
they do feel good want good things for
the country, they're doing it because they have
an ulterior motive. That's politics.
You know? That's really important to understand. So
I I'm with you on that. But I
what was the question I asked you? Just
maybe bring my mind back to it. Oh,
we're just talking about, you know, the the
thoughts on the Trump Putin summit and where
that might go and what you know, I
I don't know. We just sort of got
onto That's why I like talking with you,
though, because A little bit of a bit.
Well, it's I mean, it's not even really
a tangent
because it is you know, part of the
broader conversation around the bricks
and and and Westing and potential partnerships or
business relationships with the Trump administration and Putin.
I don't know what that would look like
going forward when they bring in a Gavin
Newsom or somebody like that. Yeah. I I
don't know if Newsom would then turn around
and be like, okay. Well, you had two
and a half years without crippling US sanctions,
and we've opened up a little bit more
commerce. We're gonna take that all away now
because a couple of you picked up some
yachts and we want them or whatever, you
know, it it is that they can confiscate,
which still is insane to me. We'll freeze
Russian assets and then give that money to
Ukraine so they can give it back us
to buy weapons. And nobody really talks about
that scam, and that's just how arms dealing
works in the twenty first century. Yeah. Right.
Well, I mean, the idea that I mean,
even just on that point of giving arms
in any context, isn't it really weird right
now that a lot of the people in
the in the, like, Trump supporters are of
the mind that somehow Trump is, like, calling
out Zelensky, and he's like anti the war.
He's been funding him the whole time. You
know, it's like such a weird way to
frame these things where, you know, it's like,
he's gonna, you know, stop the you know,
it's it's always about whatever the statement is
and not really engaging with the facts at
hand. You know, Trump, just like Biden, has
been on continuing the support of the war
in Ukraine. You know? So however this ends
up, I'm kinda with you. I think that
it's clear that they're they're ready for kind
of a new phase of this. But to
the original question,
I don't I I look. If something actually
happens where there's an agreement, it seems like
it's gonna go in the direction of
that
from either left or right. If you look
at the arguments up until now, not what
everyone's been claiming was a good thing, neither
left or right. Basically, allowing,
you know, as they would see it, Russia
to maintain its control over what it's taken
to kind of, you know, pull back a
little bit but end it. And, ultimately, that's
their in their minds, especially the left, Putin
winning. But in reality, you and I both
know the the full nature of the situation
and what they've been doing in driving this
into reality. But what's interesting is that so
if it does end up being some kind
of a deal, I don't think they'll try
to frame it as him ending the war
when in reality, it's a loss in a
way from all their perspective, but I kinda
don't think that's even what's gonna happen. I
get I get the feeling that because Israel
has interest here, it will never stop, just
like all the other situations. That's that's what
my gut tells me because they have their
eyes on this, whether it's greater Israel or,
you know, the the weird Ukraine fixation from
Zion kind of overlapping point. It's clear that
they do, and so I don't see this
ending personally.
We I mean, we were talking a little
bit last night,
and, Drew Treglia
brought it up, who directed Jones Plantation and
and Barnum World.
But there's already,
you know, Israeli
nationals that have bought up,
prime yet war torn real estate in Ukraine's,
you know, breadbasket
because it's some of the most fertile land
on the planet.
And post war,
they they wanna be able to,
you know, reap the profits from that. Mhmm.
So, I mean, it it war is always
a land grab,
and there's be fascinated on that. Much, much
more of a historical
and ancestral connection from the majority of, you
know, Israelis to to Eastern Europe, Ukraine Right.
Than there ever will be to the Middle
East, let alone
occupy Palestine.
So That's pretty it doesn't make sense. I
mean, this stuff that we talked about, you
know, almost three years ago at this point.
It's really how it was three years ago.
You know, especially,
when when Chris was still, on the show
and stuff like that, you know, we'd talk
about the overlap
between Israel and Ukraine,
and five prime ministers
were Ukrainian.
Odessa's
referred to as the gateway to Zion.
You know, it's so
it's
not at all out of the scope of
reality to look at this project as a
land clearance and land crab project since that's
what they've been doing since 1947.
Right. I mean, it's you know, there's no
like, we even mentioned before, the Kolomoisky, the
connection therein, the funding of the Azov movement
from Israel. Mhmm. Zelensky himself saying he wants
to be a big Israel. Yeah. Yeah. It's
just you can't like, so the my point
on this is that so clearly, Israel has
investment in this. What was the other one
I mentioned? Oh, yeah. The just this one.
Oh, these are for the for the show
notes since I mentioned it. Oh, it was,
it's actually this.
But the you know? So clearly, if, you
know, if they're funding this group, which we
know they are, like, this is for Horetz.
Rights groups demand Israel stop arming neo Nazis
in Ukraine 02/2018, talking about the Azov movement.
You know? And then you've got them saying
they're a big Israel. You've got the overlap.
You know? All these different points. So I
don't see how Israel
lets go of this like they do anything
else. You know? Like, look at Syria or
like any even any of these conversations,
The US gives you a certain claim and
then Israel keeps doing what it's doing. And
then The US is forced to sort of
either lie or just kind of build a
new narrative around it. That's just what keeps
happening. So it's it's points like that that
make me more convinced that it's Israel influencing
The US, which I think is just painfully
obvious, but I'm always willing to consider the
people that might argue that it's the other
way around. I mean, certainly possible, but I
think the evidence is pretty damn clear. You
know?
No. It's yeah. The if you're arguing around
that or dismissing it, it's because you're collecting
a check to do so. Well, maybe. But
I I agree with your what you're getting
at there. But I think there are plenty
of people that just you know, for example,
that just are
convinced somehow that because they use the same
word that was in the bible that that
makes them the same thing, and therefore that
it's in your you know, you're obligated somehow
to support something that's so anti your own
religion. You know? It's like I'm not talking
about their actions, by the way, what they're
clearly doing every single day as the representation
of Zionism. You know? It's just it's a
plenty of people are are
defending it for, like, obligation reasons or because
they've been convinced by of, you know, ridiculous
people like oh, not this one. That's I
was gonna I thought I had Nick Sorters
Nick Sorters tweet up. People that are out
there just going, yay. Whatever the team said
all the time, nine, you know, nine on
a 100 miles an hour every day, all
day about the same thing. You know? It's
crazy. But the the this is on the
and the Clinton point, here's five times August.
I I briefly showed this.
Cash Patel comes out on the fifteenth. You
know? And it it I mean, it's amazing
still
juxtaposed next to the complete in ongoing failure
around Epstein. You know? It's a do they
really not think like, I don't know how
they keep framing this as people have just
forgotten. It's only a fringe group.
Everybody seems to be screaming about this on
anywhere look, anywhere online. You talk to people
at the store, this comes up. You know
what I mean? It's like, it's so interesting.
And so they keep trying to deviate. So
he comes out and says, FBI agents uncovered
evidence of pay to play. I, like, I
I laughed when I saw that because, look,
he's referencing exactly what I keep calling out.
Right? The the pay to play, the guys
who broke that down in front of congress,
they're like, look. They're breaking the law. It
was very provable, and they say d o
DOJ leadership,
and McCabe ordered them to shut it down.
Okay. Let's just say that's exactly what happened.
Why didn't you guys follow-up next? Why didn't
Trump do anything about it the first term?
Right? It's like it's just you can't just
keep pretending like they shut it down. Okay.
Then why don't you guys arrest them right
now? You know? And that's that's what, five
times August is saying. My favorite part about
the part of repeatedly exposing all the corruption
is how nobody ever goes to jail for
it. He's clearly jaded by them at this
point, which I'm glad to see. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah.
No. And he I mean, he was outspoken
pretty quick too early on. He was very,
very, very vocal,
about the announcement of Stargate.
Right. Right. Because if if you have principles,
there's a line very clearly. And that line
usually is when they blatantly lie to you
or give you the thing the opposite of
what was promised. You know? They just, you
know, I there's plenty of things that we
probably disagree with, he he and I, or
others that are out there, you know, that
are more on the partisan side of it.
But I will always give credit where it's
due when somebody stands up for, you know,
especially when it's the difficult, the dangerous dangerous.
Right? As you say, like, it's clear that
that's the the moment when it came out,
you were gonna get attacked for calling it
what it was. So good on him. Yeah.
Yeah. No. We need more of it. I'm
glad that it does seem to be, you
know, picking up steam as far as that
goes. Especially and I kinda knew it was
gonna happen with Trump the second time around
because you and I both sat here for,
you know, years ahead of this Mhmm. Going,
look at who's backing him, look at, you
know, how all of this is trending, look
what he was doing with, you know, intelligence
and the military on his way out. This
is obviously setting the stage for, you know,
checking off multiple twenty, thirty boxes and Right.
All that kind of stuff. So it it
wasn't a big surprise
to see the lineup
at,
or the front row, you know, at the
inauguration
Yeah. That's wearing in.
For us. But I was, you know, a
little bit surprising how brazen it was.
Yeah. But, you
know, look at look at who we're talking
about.
But, no, I I think people really did
a lot of them saw that very quickly
Mhmm.
Who were
playing the lesser of two evils game,
but from a a little bit more of
an outsider perspective,
way easier for them to shed it than
it would be like a Nick Sorter or
somebody who has to, you know, has to
read the talking points, has to be the
cheerleader.
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, well, that's just there's
always gonna be those, you know, and they
do carry a lot of you know, there's
there's a whole ecosystem of people that just
go along with exactly whatever the the team
is pointing to. You know? They've been trained
that way. And some of them are people
that don't even you know, whatever. You know?
It's it's easy to throw all baby out
with the bathwater. Right? Just to go there
all the way. And I feel that way
often too. But it's important to remember that
there are plenty of good people out there.
People that have good intentions that maybe aren't
smart enough to see what's going on, which
is does exist, or maybe people that just
are all caught up in the or, you
know, that they're so bad that this is
okay for now. You know, like, whatever the
logic is, just remember that there are a
lot of people that are are if given
the right guidance and showing the information, will
make decisions that are based on the reality
of what's going on. You know? Just I
think it's important because we're overwhelmed, as we'll
get to in a minute, by the technological
side of this.
But every day trying to convince you that
you're the only one out there, you know,
that you're wrong, you're crazy. You know? Only
a fringe group is talking about Epstein. No.
No. Not even remotely. But if you don't
have the wherewithal, the ability to look, you
you will fall into that. COVID was a
huge thing. Remember, people were like, you know,
I'm the only one. Well, looking back,
it seems like the vast majority, as we
were saying then, were aware. We're concerned. Right?
And that's why this is all, many ways,
going the way it is. But this one
this is overlap and I think this is
one of the one of the major examples
right now. Like, you know, on the tail
of the Epstein
awareness,
what they're doing in Washington DC is is
insane. I mean, it's it doesn't matter. Even
even if they had the best of intentions,
this is it's like the same thing with
the immigration point. You know? It's like, look.
I don't care if you are doing this
for the right reasons. If you're doing the
wrong thing for the right reasons, it's still
wrong. It's like the lesser of evils. It's
still evil. Like, it's just so broken, the
way people can think about this. And so
what they're doing is on it's unquestionably
unconstitutional in a lot of ways. Even now,
the the one the recent one I saw,
which I don't think I have in here,
the National Guard Point. I mean, they've they've
violated Posse Comitatus Act Posse
Comitatus
Act more than once. Sent just since this
administration. I've talked to military people, and that's
when they deploy the military and enforce the
law regardless, or the National Guard enforcing the
law, or now we're seeing sending National Guard
from other states across state lines. That I've
read it right from that act. That's one
of the key ways that's not allowed.
They don't care, though. They're just they're just
doing whatever they want. And so in this
case, Nick's order, AG Panbanje has just deputized
Secret Service, who, by the way, have entirely
different training, who have entirely different ways they
view situations, but let's let them and deal
with average people on the street. You know?
And it says, and giving them warrantless arrest
powers. Now
was this and that they can now arrest
criminals in the streets for violating federal or
local laws. Right. Okay. So the point that
keeps screaming at people right now is that,
well, you know, if police can catch someone
in a crime, they don't need a warrant,
it's like, okay. If you think for one
second that when but despite all the evidence
that we can bring to the table that
these people are all out there just waiting
for people making crime and arresting people committing
crimes, that's not what's happening. And if they
wouldn't need all of this, if all they're
doing is arresting people, this is about something
else. And my point is they're clearly
out there enforcing
doing things that are, like, like, with the
immigration point,
looking for people, profiling people, and then going
after them based on information, not like and
this is where you would need a warrant.
Right? Going into homes, which just happened.
That so these people know what they're doing.
And so the point is regardless,
praising that. I said, so you're now cheering
on warrantless arrest powers?
Is it America it's America first to openly
violate the constitution because they did it first,
which seems to be the logic out there
today? Yeah. It seems you're blindly cheerleading this
country right into despotism along with your team
sport politics, sycophants. And plenty of people called
it out. True street media,
well, Sasha Latypova was one of them, like,
going, this is the most insane thing I've
ever seen. You know? What what do you
so on the DC point in general, but,
you know, with Nick, the partisan element as
well, you know, where do you think this
is going? Is this gonna get worse? Are
they how do you see this consistent thing?
They're gonna push for it to get worse.
They're only meeting with minimal resistance, and it's
usually,
you know, small groups,
of people who are just sitting there filming
and yelling get out of our town. Mhmm.
And that seems to be about it.
The thing that sucks is that there's a
small but vocal part of the country that
really does seem to want this.
You know what I mean? They they seem
to be very, very happy
that militarized
freaking
kidnappers
are
roaming their towns. And I was saying to
my girl earlier,
you ever notice how there's never an an
ice raid
at a really bougie restaurant
in a rich community?
Right. Like, they don't you know,
the the
entire kitchen staff and then their family
is all working under the table, both at
the restaurant and probably about seven or eight
Airbnbs
cleaning those out and doing maintenance and landscaping.
And it's all just, you know Just as
common in high end restaurants. I've worked with
myself.
Yeah. And you never see
the ice freaking goons pull up for that.
Right. Yeah. I mean, it's very selectively applied,
obviously. Right? And even Trump came out more
than once now, made it clear that in
certain circumstances, I guess, they get to define
what that means and where, you know, their
hotels, their restaurants, his friends, the people that
are, you know, whatever. They're okay, though, because,
you know, we know them or they don't,
and they don't care. It's just about the
people that they're supporting. You know, it it's
obvious what this is. You know? And so
the the the where this is going. Yeah.
To your point first about the people that
support this, you know, it's like I said
before. I think there are people that are
misguided about why they think this is good,
and almost entirely what it seems to rest
on is the Democrats broke it first.
And that's why we have to do this.
And it's like the this is broken logic.
Again,
even if it's for the right reasons, guys,
you are setting yourself up for failure. It
doesn't ever get back. RFK Jr told you
this. They don't ever give you power back.
Right? It's it's very, very clear. Here's actually
one example of that.
Oh, actually, no. That's right. Well, I wasn't
I don't think,
wasn't sure if we were gonna get into
the immigration thing we put I think I
put it further down.
Yeah. Here. I'll just we'll just talk about
this real quickly since it's does overlap with
what we're talking about.
I've got three different points here. Oops.
So the one I was referencing
just
now
is this one.
We don't have to play it. It just
simply says the officers refused to show their
badges or even what which by the way,
regardless, the the warrant thing aside, which is
huge, they're legally required to identify themselves and
have their and or or, you know, all
everything that we all know. And Yeah. People
out there are screaming it's okay because Democrats
are gonna hurt them. You know? It's like
it's just there's no logic to what's happening.
And it says, didn't show badges or even
say what agency they're they're with. A bystander
tells the agent, you guys are ruining this
country. You know that. Right? And they say,
Liberals already ruined it. You see, this is
this is even embedded within the people themselves.
They believe it's okay because they're fighting something
that broke it first. And it's just, you
know, you simple minded people are falling for
this. Mhmm. No no no more simple minded
than the blunt for enforcement arm that doesn't
even realize they're violating their own you know,
violating the constitution.
Really crazy.
Yeah. Nor nor would it nor does it
matter because they've already justified
the means
for
what you're gonna round up.
Are you gonna be satisfied when it's just
the people that you think are here illegally?
Or then are you going to since you
believe
that,
you know,
nebulous liberals
ruin the country. Are you going to plead
to your supervisors
to set your sights on them?
Right. Because they're the people that broke it,
and it's your job to make sure that
it gets fixed.
So aren't they the real criminals? You know,
I'd be the people that you rounded up
the first time. They were here as a
result
of the criminality of those people. So why
aren't we rounding up those people, boss? So
let's go round up those people.
Because logic doesn't apply in all this. Right?
I mean, it's, you know, it it's just
it's it's it's unfortunate
there are so many people that
want you know? Again, I like, for here's
here's somebody in the chat that says,
a sidewalk location for a warrant. You know?
And it's and I you know? Yeah. It's
not you might have already missed what we
were just saying. Right? It's not even about
in some cases, they're it's not necessary. But
if you give them a blanket overlap of
how they're allowed to do it, then and
that's why we're seeing them kick into people's
homes, which is already happening. Are you okay
with that? You know what I mean? Like,
it's like or the idea that they are
very clearly profiling people. There's no crime in
place. They're going and at this point, I'm
talking about ICE, not necessarily only what's going
on in Washington DC. Right? But the point
is
that clearly, they are violating these things every
which way, every single day, and it's tangible.
It's provable. We can literally lay it out
in front of us, but people wanna respond
as if, you know, oh, that's just Democrat
talking points. You know? And, again, I don't
think this is the primary conversation or rather
the majority, but it is clearly something that
takes over what we're looking at. You know?
And it's just everywhere you look. Here's an
example right now.
A, I used to detain two year old
Canadian toddler fifty one days, more than double
the legal allowed time, but that's okay because
Democrats. You know? Another three year old child
was locked up for four days in a
holding room meant for detention,
for twelve, for under twelve hour or, for
for detention under twelve hours, and this is
the report talking about it. These are just
quick points. This one was and we can
watch it. It's insane, by the way.
This person's filming. Watch what the ICE agent
does. Dang.
Right. Right. Blindside tackles a peaceful protester from
behind, which, by the way, is a US
veteran who fought in Afghanistan. But it's okay
because Democrats. Right? Mhmm. And the agent slams
man to the ground then pins him down
with their body weight engulfed in tear gas.
Less lethal bullets were shot directly at the
person's head from the roof, said witnesses trying
to help the man. He's a veteran of
this country, they screamed. He's done more for
this country than any of you. But it's
it doesn't matter because they were identified as
somebody who was filming them do what they're
doing because that's a that's a a crime.
Right? Well, according to current administration, it is.
You can literally be arrested like that for
simply filming what they're doing. And, you know,
so that that's what a democracy looks like
when they cover their faces and they're gestapo.
I mean, guys, it's so
it's in your face what this is. Taking
over more cities, expanding this discussion, extensions of
this
ongoing
federalization, which is not gonna go away, or
the conversation of taking over the police force
and and and inserting the DEA.
Like, this is I just don't understand why
this is not boiling over right now, especially
from conservatives. You know? It is so far
beyond the pale. It blows me away. I
would have never predicted this.
Yeah. I mean, it
I
it's
hard for me to put it into
exact words because it really did seem
like not necessarily
an inevitability,
but something that Trump has been talking about
for a long time
as far as, like, needing to just
unleash
the police and military
on the public and have them crack skulls
until
law and order
is returned. And it's, you know Yeah. Law
and order style. Strength. Right? That's what they
were advocating
advocating on the campaign trail,
for the entire time that he was candidate
Trump for this one,
peace through strength.
And we've talked about I think since both
of us have had shows that the way
that the foreign policy works is it's always
visited on the citizens
at home.
And this is exactly that. This is US
foreign policy
come to the domestic shores.
Yeah. And we're watching it play out in
real time. And you're right. The the entire
conservative movement
with, you know,
some notable exceptions
seems to be totally willing to roll over
for this just because it's not Kamala Harris
doing it. Just because it's not Joe Biden.
Yeah. No. It's actually fair to say it
like that. Like, that they're willing to roll
over, but some of them may not like
it, may even call it out. But, yes,
you're right. It seems like most of them
are willing to just kinda go, you know,
but I don't I wonder how much of
that is taking place in just, like, the
general honest kind of, like, you know, people
that don't have massive followings. There's no way
to see their voice. Like, you know, you
just I just wonder. I wish there's a
way to really truly know what that collective
kind of, you know, general consensus was because
it's just you never know. But so back
to the point of your, you know, the
surveillance in the built like this. This is
an important point to think about. You know?
Like, the whole thing where they say, you
know, like, people that wanna say, you know,
we're all Gaza. It's reasons like this or
that we're next. Despite how they wanna push
it on us and say that, you know,
it's we don't stop Hamas. They're coming to
your doorstep despite there being literally no evidence
to make that make sense or the, the
the, know, impossibility of that reality for a
thousand different reasons. This, however,
is going on and has been going on
for seventy six years or actually, you know,
you'll get the point. Here's the most chilling
thing I've seen responding to these immigration rates.
I'm an immigrant rights attorney, and usually, I'm
a pretty optimistic guy. I don't get scared
easily. I love watching horror movies. Over the
past six months, I've seen some really disturbing
stuff. At one location, people hid when I
showed up, and I still found them using
a thermal drone that detects body heat. Where
was this technology first tested?
By Israel in occupying Palestine. When people get
taken by ICE, they often refuse to say
their names. So ICE identifies them using a
facial
recognition technology.
Where was this tech first used? By Israel
in occupied Palestine.
When people refuse to let ICE search their
phones,
ICE will plug their phones into this box
and it unlocks their phone. Where was this
tech first used? By Israel in occupied Palestine.
The amount of dystopian tech that the US
government has taken from Israel to use in
its own country is terrifying. And this is
why freeing Palestine and abolishing ICE goes hand
in hand.
Now regardless of people's thoughts on both either
of those action points,
I just you know? And that's these are
just a couple of point. You could somebody
it it's worth out there listening. Do your
own due diligence and recognize how many of
these things right now are being rolled out
through ICE, building out your technocratic panopticon
that are being tested on innocent people starving
to death in Gaza. You know? Every it's
it's all over the place, and your government
is well aware. They're funding it with your
tax dollars. And, of course, you know, as
as my truth to your media points out,
rebuilding trust. Did you see this? I'm sure
you've talked about it. The World Economic Forum
naming BlackRock Larry Fink as its new chairman.
You know? It's just it's it's like the
Gates point I made earlier. We all remember
that Gates had a meeting with Trump in
this administration, and he left all excited about
the vaccine direction. Of course, they didn't like
the way that felt, so they all ignored
it. Right? Team smart politics. This kind of
idea, you know, with BlackRock funding Twitter and
Elon Musk. It's okay because he's on our
team. Right? There are globalists are supporting. It's
okay because it's our team. They all just
see the good the goodness of our direction
now. They've stopped their globalist plans, and they're
helping Trump because we're winning. You know? It's
like it's it's, like, beyond childish. And the
overlapping point here is that BlackRock is immersed
with Trump's administration just like it was last
time. He's the one that handed over the
king the keys to the financial castle during
COVID nineteen. You know? Everywhere you look,
sad.
Yeah. And it's especially with something like BlackRock,
where it's an entity that has more
in its, you know, business holdings than the
GDP of most countries.
Oh, yeah. I mean, it's I mean, it's
literally it's called a shadow bank, which is
so crazy to me. Like, that's what the
type of bank is called. It's it's it's
this it it's like the deep state financial
backing. You know? It's like you could look
at it that way. It's what it really
feels like, but it's it's wrong, guys. Everything
they're doing is like, even if not like,
even necessarily a legal sense, even though I
argue that's probably all over what they do.
It's more about the the,
what would you call it? The lack of
morals, like, the way that they conduct business,
you know, but the what in what they're
doing. You can look at what they're supporting.
Right? And it's obvious that these people are
behind what we're all aware of, what we're
worried about. You know? I mean, it's you
can't hide these things, and it's the same
kind of idea we've seen with, like, the
that's why I use that image. If you
go back long enough, you know, it's too
abstract. The point is that they're financing
the growing control structure in a lot of
ways. You know? And I think that's very
obvious, all the different overlaps. With Israel, as
always as well.
So let let's I'm Go ahead. No. No.
I was just gonna jump into the Nova
Scotia thing. Go ahead. You have a comment?
Yeah. No. No. No. Let's let let's do
that because we we could spend another hour
on just,
you know,
the the octopus of global control as seen
through the lens of Larry Fink and BlackRock.
Right. That's why I was gonna go as
I just was like, you know, it's it's
a whole conversation, but it's important to understand,
you know, that we I'll I'll I'll even,
bring this up
just so in case you wanted to go
more on that.
Where was what was it called?
I'll just type in BlackRock. That might come
up. Yeah. There it is. The COVID coup.
All these so many it's amazing how many
of these moves take place under Trump and
how little attention they get from the very
people who would lose their minds if this
was anybody with a Democrat name. You know?
The COVID coup, the Black Rock take over
American interest. That's the image I'm talking about
of, like, Standard Oil and the the fake
breakup that gave them more power. You know?
It's how these things work. But so, this
overlaps with this both these conversations in interesting
ways. I mean, we've talked about glyphosate for
so long. I personally feel that this, for
two reasons,
is clearly part of kind of the,
I guess, specifically, kind of the social engineering
part of it from the idea of,
I guess, giving you rationale even if there
is action being taken for a while. You're
suddenly not allowed to go into the woods,
which is just it's it it it clearly
aligns with the world we see building out
around us, but also the glyphosate
aspect of it and what that does and
what we know it's a part of, and
including, by the way, making it more likely
to start fires because things dry out. And
so it clearly doesn't align with the premise
of the narrative of why this is all
shutting down. Here's the headline that everyone's pointing
to. Nova Scotia approves glyphosate spraying on 3,577
acres of drought stricken, fire prone forest.
Now before we even go into it, you
know, what have you seen about this? What
what are your thoughts on the the bigger
story and, you know, or glyphosate in particular?
I mean, it is odd that they they
start the spraying immediately after they ban people
from going outside
or into
particularly
those areas. You'd think that instead of
spraying the area with something that,
yeah, is
it I don't
on a long enough timeline, if it's left
to coagulate, potentially
flammable
too, you'd think that you would divert resources
into
clearing the forest of, you know, brush and
material that's going to accelerate fire
rather than
do things that would exacerbate the problem, but
it is government. But the point is that
it creates it you know, what it will
do is kill the things. Like, it's a
hurt it's it's the same herbicide we've herbicide
is it her it's weird. Herbicide? Herbicide?
The that we've talked about in the past
where they you know, it'll kill weeds and
whatever else. But the real point is about
creating these things that are somehow, you know,
like your fruits that wouldn't be hurt by
it. And then you could drench it in
that, and it kills all the weeds around
it, but it clearly does have the negative
effects. The point, though, is that if you're
gonna claim it's because of fires,
then this is making that problem worse. Yeah.
So it just doesn't make any sense. But
I think we all get the sense that
there's something more to this. You know? And
I'm not even saying, like, necessarily know it
besides the obvious that we're seeing. Because why
would I mean, look. They've been spraying this
well before this. Yeah. Right? So maybe maybe
it's not even necessarily that they're connected. You
know? But it's just an interesting overlap, especially
since the argument that's why it caught my
attention. The argument that there's, you know, too
many there's the the fire hazard are so
large that we can't let you go in
the woods right now in Nova Scotia in
specific areas and then do something that provably
makes that risk worse. Like, okay. So they're
lying to us.
Or they're just that incompetent. I guess that
would probably make sense today. But I think
there'd be interesting ways to go into it
first, the idea that that's even something that
they can do, or they can't as as
far as I'm concerned. Not necessarily from, like,
a US
constitution perspective or in Canada, the same kind
of thing, but just from a global human
rights, like, free movement point. How are you
gonna tell me that I just can't go
into the woods?
You know? Because let's be clear. In my
opinion, government should not be able to own
land in the first place in any sense.
You know? So on that point alone, like,
they're very dystopian, very very alarming or even
Orwellian, you know, that were telling us we
just can't leave our home. That was very
reminiscent of the COVID nineteen kind of time
frame. You know? And what what do you
think their what do you think the real
motivation
is? Well, I mean, we we talked about
during COVID how climate lockdowns were something that
we were going to be seeing
going forward.
And this to me definitely falls under that
category because they've been saying no. Humans are,
you know, the reason that these things are
happening, and they're not totally
wrong. But at least in Canada, they've determined
that a number of those fires this year
specifically
have been
controlled burns that got out of hand. They
were trying to do, like, a fire school
thing, and then winds picked up, and they
didn't know.
And next thing you know,
the entire Midwest has smoked out. It's,
Yeah. I mean, it's and it's an enforced
climate lockdown
because I was also reading where
a bunch of and I I can't remember
the percentage off top of my head, but
it's a decent chunk of no Nova Scotia's
law enforcement has been diverted to
the woods
where they, you know, are biking around
or,
on boats and stuff like that in order
to bust people
who might be going out for a hike.
Which is interesting.
The the lady from the Nova Scotia government
that was like, yeah. So you can't be
there because we won't have the resources for
you. You just put a whole bunch of
resources
into the forest Right. In order to stop
people. Not you could have done that to
aid or help people, maybe. Yeah. But you're
not doing that. You're doing it to prevent
them from going outside.
It it really makes you wonder.
And this is just a, you know, just
a thought that can you know, as as
action goes forward and what happens later, maybe
it'll make more sense. You know, that if
if we can see that there's an inconsistency
and, again, maybe they're just that inept. You
know? It's possible. But that there's that seems
like a lie. You know? That it maybe
isn't about that they're worried about fires. And
now, you know, spraying the glass and say,
it makes you wonder whether or not there
is something important about this land, which is
always where these things go, but be care
the point is in the conversation of the
partisan side, mainstream alternative media, it tends to
become the assumptive, becomes the fact, and then
that builds the narrative around you know, we
need to be able to prove these things.
But if there's something important for this land,
and this is a part we've talked about,
whether it's the climate lockdowns or the, you
know, kind of,
technocratic land seizing that ultimately then that we
all of a sudden see some massive fire
that rips a part of this and they
build something new, then, yeah, then we should
consider that this was all planned in that
way. You know? But without evidence, we shouldn't,
you know, lean into that any further. But
very interesting, though, because it doesn't seem to
make much sense, and we do know that
they have designs this government's power structures of
changing the world
in the direction they wanna see it. You
know? And here here is the,
where was it here? The going back to
2024,
same this is just from, Nova Scotia forest
matters saying glyphosate impacts on Nova Scotia species
at risk and blue green algae. The point
is that this spraying has been being called
out around this in particular because of the
effects on the environment. So the other point
of it is the glyphosate. And they just
clearly don't care about your health, about the
side effects. They just deny it's like anything
else. They're still pretending the vaccines are safe
and effective. And here's some terrible stuff that
will hurt your environment, that will cause cancer
for you, and we're gonna dump it all
over the area, assuming that's there's not more
to the story, right? Twenty twenty four pesticide
spraying approvals.
This is 2014.
However,
the one they just approved, just in case
it matters, people out there, was approved in
2025,
August 11.
Ends in 12/31/2025.
So the additional point on that is the
Maha Trump administration is approving glyphosate spraying despite
what he has said about glyphosate
many, many, many times, or at least it's
under their purview, which matters. You know?
Yeah. While giving,
you know, immunity
to Monsanto
Yep. Over not just the spring, but the,
Terminator
seed program too.
Yeah.
Well, there there's a bunch of articles I'll
include on this. There's one that I think
is really important. I had a roundtable with
Stephanie Seneff PhD and Danny Rancourt Danny Rancourt.
Glyphosate, mRNA, and spike proteins destroying your body,
and Stephanie Seneff makes the argument that this
was, like, almost by design. Right? That you
can see the glyphosate was almost in a
synergistic way in a, you know, in a
bad way,
exponentially increasing the side effects, the negative outcomes
of the COVID shots. You know? So it's
like you start to wonder how these things
ultimately come together, but I'll include a lot
of these. And just this is what's so
crazy, how long it's been going on. Glyphosate,
worse than we could imagine. It's everywhere, which
is a point that I keep making, and
these articles itself will make that point. It's
in this air you're breathing. It's in the
clothes you're wearing. It's in the food you're
eating. It's not a joke. It's literally everywhere,
and that's something that we can't take back,
at least not immediately. A jury found Monsanto's
Roundup Roundup caused a man's cancer. We, you
know, we all know this for the most
part.
Study shows how glyphosate and aluminum can operate
synergistically destroy your human human brain. So mold
and so that's aluminum in any other injections
they're giving you, but now also just the
COVID shot itself in a separate conversation.
Guman Sandoz gly glyphosate linked to major ocean
and coral coral reef die offs, but they
don't care about any of that. Glyphosate contaminants
in processed brand name foods. All many of
them you could probably see right here.
That's not surprising seeing seeing how it's literally
everywhere, but it's just more and more in
those things. Another shocking study finds glyphosate present
in childhood vaccines.
Glyphosate found in most vaccines. Now these are
just varying dates, 02/2016. We've been doing this
for a long time. Groundbreaking review shows how
glyphosate alters DNA toward chronic illness, almost like
they've been trying to get you sick in
very specific ways.
The piss test heard around the world. I've
talked about these many times.
A 150
European parliament members to test their urine for
glyphosate. And it's almost as a way to
challenge that it's a problem. Every one of
them had it in their urine.
It's fucking insane. Oh, I've not such a
cuss on the show.
Monsanto's glyphosate found in all wines tested in
Napa Valley, even the organic ones. Even though
that makes them no longer organic. But you
know what they did in the industry? They
just went, oh, well, since it's everywhere, now
we just call it organic.
Doesn't that work? Right? It's just it's ridiculous.
They still call them organic even though they're
legally not. Or this one, which is frustrating,
Monsanto weed killer found in 14 popular German
beers. The reason this was such a big
deal is because these people go back, you
know, shit, like, a very long time making
these, like, specific craft beers, like, family lineage,
and and they're ruined
because they found out they have glyphosate in
them, which, you know, in their minds, which
I agree, ruins
the specialized recipe that they had. Monsanto's chemical,
glyphosate makes its way into 85%
of personal hygiene products. That was 02/2016.
Anyway, just incredible that that's still being used.
I thought that was important to point out.
Any thoughts on that before we move on
to something else? I mean, we we know
we know it's, you know, poison. We know
it's the maybe not necessarily designed to kill
humans, but that's what it's done and known
to have do do for a very, very,
very long time. You know? The fact that
it existed all is an indictment
on the
court system
in the first place, the, you know, the
government,
any government
that allows it in their country. There have
been someones that have kicked it out. Right.
You know, it would to their credit,
at least on that one thing.
But yeah. No. It's it's disgusting. And I
I do I think there's, you know, that
I'm inclined to think that there's
more overlap than just the contracts were signed
for August, so that's why they're spraying when
they're not letting people anywhere.
Right. Right. Well, I mean, I that that's
the whole thing is that, like, clearly, if
they were concerned
about fire,
then somebody would be like, well, hold on.
That's going to make the fire worse. You
know? It's like it's just very simple logic,
and so that doesn't make sense to me.
You know? And I do I it's just
like we saw with PG and E and,
you know, these different previous examples. There's always
a deeper story. Lahaina. You know? And it
doesn't have to even mean that there's like,
may maybe it's just that they there's there's
a kind of juxtaposition of of agendas and
somebody said, well, we're gonna do this anyway.
How about we just don't stop it? And
then maybe if it all burns down that
we this design that we have that we
profit from, maybe that'll work. You know? It's
like it doesn't always have to be some
grand explain. Maybe there's just profiteering, manipulating people
out there that are maybe
nudging at the direction of being beneficial to
them. You know? It's like, there's there's so
many ways to look at it. The point
is that this is what governments do. You
know? And that this is why it's behooves
us to constantly,
from at whatever side,
hold them aggressively accountable. You know? And so
with all the evidence we have, with all
the things that RFK has said or in
either side, this shouldn't still be happening. Technically,
this is Nova Scotia. The point though is
that you know what? You know what? I
take that back actually because this is Nova
Scotia, the point of of, RFK Maha. My
point for overlapping is that they are still
using this all over this country regardless, and
so it's the same point. But, you know,
it just they should stop these things. It's
not that difficult. If you care about this
and you know it's wrong,
weren't they the ones just telling us that
they could do whatever they want because they
have a mandate? And then the moment they
don't do things, it's like, well, they can't
just snap their fingers. It's like, but you
just said that they could you know?
Frustrating.
Right. You spend six to eight months hearing
on day one we're going to. Right. And
then on day one, they go, here's Sam
Altman and Larry Ellison,
and they're gonna
they're they're gonna create
RMNA,
mRNA jabs for everything.
Yep. Every kind of cancer. Are are you
happy? So what you voted for. Right? There
there's a point there's a point with that
too that I think is interesting. I don't
know if you've seen
If I still have it if I don't
have it, I won't I will just I'll
just tell you about it. But there's the
clip that I played before,
before, last couple shows, actually.
Doesn't look like I've got it right here.
But it's the one of the people, saying,
oh, is the at the Aspen
something institute, not the not the normal there's
an Aspen, like, defend something. The point is
they were speaking about the
ethnic bio weapons or or just typically tailoring
them towards certain DNA. And so my point
is, like, what what do you think the
what do you think I mean, look at
what Stargate is. Right? They're taking your d
they're they're tailoring it towards you personally based
on your DNA.
So it's a dual use platform like all
of these things are. Right? They could create
something that could
inoculate you, whatever you we wanna pretend that
even means these days, or it could be
something that has a negative effect. I mean,
that you could prove that with everything around
this technology.
So it's just really weird that, you know,
you see this now, and this is the
push, and we have this weird building conversation.
You know, I just it's worth considering that
that is what that's supposed to be. You
know, with everything else that's happening, all these
different points of, like, your personal whether it's
biometrics or your, like, bio your,
biological information,
they're, like, greedily scooping that up everywhere they
can, if not already got pretty much everything.
You know?
Yeah. And it's I mean, I whether, you
know, you join the military or you've been
arrested or you submitted DNA to '23 andMe
or you've been born in the last, you
know, twenty five, thirty years.
Like, there there's been a registry
before all of that. You ever given blood?
You know? Ever been in the hospital?
All that kind of stuff. You had multiple
dentists have been,
you know, that required to give up
specifics on the all that kind of
and so, yeah, I mean, it's it's the
the majority of people have
some form on file that contains their DNA.
Yeah. I mean and far more than that
too. Right? I mean, we're at a point
now where this is that's the point to
make about biometrics or that, whether it's about
some, like, cloning overlap or some kind of
biometric
digital twin. You know? I I say it
often. I don't think we really grasp what
that means even now, let alone in twenty
years, you know, that some company owns every
piece of bio
biometric biological data that makes you you, but
they own that. Right? What does that mean?
What if they make a version of you?
I mean, these things may sound ridiculous, but
realize, I made that joke on the other
show the other day. Like, they we cloned
a sheep, like, thirty years ago, and then
we never hear about it again. It's like,
okay. Pretty sure there's probably something somewhere going
on. I'm not suggesting that they're making clone
armies, but who the f knows? You know,
it's like clearly there's been technology in that
direction. We're at a point now where they're
so far beyond that and so many of
you wonder what's going on. And so that
is something we should consider. It's not a
false conversation.
So why would you ever let the stuff
out of your control? But then the biometric
side of it is just as concerning. You
know? Like, when we as they drive us
into this biodigital
convergence world, what does that truly mean? You
know? And it's for many people, it's far
too late. They've acquiesced to everything they've ever
been asked, and now they own you. And
possibly even because you took that shot, maybe
you're even patented in that way too. Worth
considering. Right? The idea of the whole patent
in life and the idea if they gave
you something that genetically altered your DNA in
a way that they patent, which is true,
that does exist, that they have patented versions
of DNA of of, you know, the whole
Monsanto and the crop thing. It's the same
conversation. Maybe have them play that clip again
on the way out that maybe there'll be
a time in the world in the future
where they argue that they literally own you.
Now maybe a judge will go, that's crazy.
They're human beings. You can't do that. But,
you know, that clip I played, it's clear
that there was a moment like that with
animals, and we lost that battle. Right? Companies
won. Another patenting, which the patenting how you
it's weird to say that.
Everything they keep their hands on for the
longest time. And that that was, like, twenty
years ago that happened. You know? Mhmm. Very
weird where we are.
No. It's super creepy. And every once in
a while, you'll get,
you know,
celebrity or hip hop artist that that comes
out and is like, yes. They're cloning people.
You know? Right. And you you just you
never know. You never know, especially when they,
like,
you know, won't drop names or anything like
that. But when they do, you're like, are
you sure?
And I'm I wouldn't put it past.
You know? I really wouldn't. It's it's certainly
weird enough out there for that to be
a part of our reality.
Yeah. And people are nefarious enough to try
and pull something like that off.
Yeah. And I'm not in any way suggesting
that I know that or even arguing that
I think that's the case. Just as possible.
You know what I mean? Like, if there's
I haven't seen any evidence to back that
up, but it's like that's the same thing
I may say about space, for example. It's
like, with what we know and what they've
already shown, what they've been doing,
how do we not think that there's a
hell of a lot more going on out
there than we can prove, that we can
see? Same kind of point. You know? I'm
not saying that I know that or a
thing, but it's like it's just almost a
logical point. Like, there must be more development
in that some way. If they're out there
doing gain of function, bio, dual use, you
know, whatever,
then I'm pretty sure that's happening too, especially
in some weird, you know, Prospera, Middle Honduras,
nobody confirming what they're doing kinda situation. You
know? Like, I made that point about the
I think it's called LifeCircle or whatever the
company was called. In Prospera,
one of the companies
that has an a home office there as
well as in Texas is a genetic a
gene therapy, genetic manipulation kinda thing. You know,
it's like God only knows the kinda stuff
these billionaires are doing where nobody's paying attention,
far even less than what they're dealing with
now. Because no one's holding them accountable in
this country, let alone somewhere where nobody can
see anything and there's no laws to all
the it's, you know, it's I've I have
I'm convinced that there's some, you know, more
like that going on in the world. I
don't know. How how could it not be?
You know?
Yeah. And Yeah. It's well, I mean, and
I know I bring this up all the
time, time, but, I mean, nobody's still even
taking a look at what was happening at
Zorro Ranch. And to assume that Zorro Ranch
is the only facility like that in The
US alone, let alone
the rest of the planet, I I believe
would be pretty naive.
Yep. And so it just kinda underscores that.
With enough private capital and distance from the
public eye, you can get away with a
ton of nefarious,
you know,
demonology.
I don't know how to put it. Yeah.
I mean, that's the thing is that they
they have the power, the influence, the wherewithal
to to do whatever they want, really. As
long as they can find a way to
make sure that they won't be legally held
accountable for the that's that's what's going on
in the world. And the sad thing is
that maybe at one point it was different,
but today it seems that governments are, you
know, either
capitulating or captured
by something like they just don't care. You
know? And in fact, it's like they, you
know, and you could almost argue the the
logical point of saying that whether it's in
Israel or just at a company, you know,
that have
over time recognized that they, you know, we
we want our people in those positions, clearly.
Right? Obviously. Not maybe funding, lobbying. Yeah. But
maybe more than that. You know? Maybe man
sharing candidate kind of stuff. So we've we've
kind of worked these people into these positions
to where there is literally, outside of people
pitchforks marching down the street, anything that's ever
gonna have them held accountable. And you know
what? That kinda looks like what we've been
dealing with the last fifty years or more.
You know?
I'm looking for does. And even people with
pitchforks mark marching down the street,
I think the the these people have to
be broken economically. I don't think that they
can I don't think conventional protest is gonna
be the method by which they cede power?
I agree. And I wasn't referring to protest.
But my point is that I definitely I
I I think that the only thing and,
again, I'm not even advocating for that. Just
the point is that we might well be
in that position where, you know, if they
ultimately control those things, then it's gonna be
very difficult to make that change. You know?
But, as always, step one is to simply
call these things out, have a conversation about
it, and make sure we're on the same
page about what we can really see. But,
yeah, it's it's very obvious how this has
gone and how clearly that, over time,
the control is there. You know? And so,
yeah, I I think that that's what this
is. I did the show, the the technocratic
tiptoe, and I'm playing on the Dave I
David Ick totalitarian tiptoe,
and I think it's just it's just shockingly
transparent that we're watching a change of the
guard. Right? A transition. Like, one thought I
had the other day actually was sort of
the Israel who has been playing a I
mean, almost in a way in many ways
created the old broke, you know, blackmail network
infiltration kind of that's what our governments are
dealing with right now. UK,
it's shockingly clear in The UK and The
United States. Same thing. Right? And so clearly,
you know, you you there there's some kind
of that influence, but it's been going on
for a long time using kind of old
blackmail force model. But now and this is
just hypothetical. I don't know if this is
even the truth, but now you see maybe
there's a new you know, the Silicon Valley,
the technocrats, the that that kind of side
of things is showing itself to be the
the the driving force for the future, AI.
And so I think at some point a
while back, Israel noticed that and
buried its head in that direction and grabbed
everything it could and say, k. You know,
we see we see that. We saw that
shift. You know, they're adamant about the tech
field in Silicon Valley, that all the tech
startups, the startup nation. Well, that's what Israel
unit 8,200, that's what they're doing. They built
they I mean, here, I well, I wonder
if I still have that clip.
You know, the one with,
let me just look for it real quick.
The, you know, the one where you have
the guy on the the I the IDF
guy, the mask, saying all the world's pushing.
Yeah. Yeah. Do you have that clip by
chance?
No. I can
probably grab it real quick. It's okay. I'll
I'll just gonna see if I can grab
it online real quick. But, you know, the
point is simply that they're literally telling you
that, you know, the world's our stage, and
we we make companies, and nobody knows the
difference. I mean, it's, like, really, really blatant,
and they're, like, praising it like it's some
obvious you know, some good thing.
Yeah. I don't know if I can find
it, but, you know, we also don't remember
that.
But so the the the back to the
point that this seems to be like this
the the building new direction. Right? And then
ultimately, Israel has just pushed its way into
this and is trying to main make sure
that it doesn't
become an irrelevant or, you know, that it's
that that's just a thought that I had.
It does kinda feel because look look at
you can't you have to be clear that
the old network, at the very least, was,
you know, used a lot by the Zionist
structure. And so maybe they're just doing may
you know, maybe it's all that. I don't
know. But I think it's interesting to see
how that's playing out. But so let's talk
about the
over the the kind of the building structure
of this all. You know? And it's very,
very clear how all this is rapidly rolling
out. And so we talked about the ICE
overlap. I put that clip already, all of
it coming from things they're testing in Israel,
TrueStream Media. This will be used against the
people cheering it on, and walls are also
built to keep people in. It says US
Homeland Security will acquire advanced iris biometric scanning
technology from b I square technology for ice
to identify individuals in seconds from virtually anywhere,
as well as the low Earth orbit satellites
that are now able to see you. You
know? You're literally identify people from space, which
I bet you they've been doing for quite
a long time.
I it just doesn't stop. Like, it's just
they're building this direction. I was I was
gonna grab the
this one too since since this is clearly
relevant.
Great.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately. Happy life more. That wasn't really
For years, congress has required
biometric
entry exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk, no action, never happens,
never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talk.
Unfortunately, when there is action, it's always the
wrong decision. Do you ever notice? But they're
great people. I'm glad I let her off
the hook. You know? It's like it's just
I always make this point so funny that
this is it's either one of two things.
This is how easy we are to manipulate,
or this is how dumb they think we
are. You know? Clinton couldn't do it, and
we're supposed to go, oh, then we should
because Clinton bad. So if she didn't, then
we should. I mean, that's literally the level
of this logic because nobody out there on
his team wanted that. No one's calling for
a biometric tracking system. They wanted a physical
wall, which is what you claim. And so
it's like this this clumsy pivot into, like,
the thing, like, the actual not even calling
it something else. You know? It just it
just it keep just confounds me how obvious
this is.
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system.
Number
Promises kept, ladies and gentlemen. Promises kept.
Right.
ISIS biometric surveillance reach reach expands with b.
Now is that is that supposed to be
squared, I think? Or is it b one
two?
Maybe this is how it's typed in there.
I'm not sure. I'm I'm gonna go into
this more in-depth, but just the, you know,
the reality of it. But, I mean, guys,
this has been coming for quite a long
time. We've been talking about this forever.
I'll come back to this one.
Do you have any thoughts on the
biometric development for I I wanted to go
into see this stuff's not even organized. A
part about the the cannabis overlap because of
this direction and, like, the food part of
it. But Okay. Any thoughts on it? Yep.
By all means, please do.
I you I think I think you know
my take. I I know there there's some
people in the the rumble chat that aren't
familiar
with with me, so I'll just give a
truncated
version real quick. But,
yeah, this is what this is what we've
been talking about for, you know, eight years
on my show. And Mhmm. Every time we
sit down
on a Tuesday or, you know, an IMA
panel or something like that, when we get
into this subject, it's just it's been
so in everybody's face for so long
that now it almost seems like a surprise
that it's being pulled off.
Mhmm.
But
with the Maya Angelou
quote where, you know, people show you who
they are, believe them. Right. Like, the this
is what Trump was doing eight years ago.
This is what, you know, the tech bros
have been doing the entire time. They're not
even trying to hide any of this.
Right. I mean, that that's what's so so
crazy about it is that it can be
like, this is what we talked about all
of us. Like, the you know, the the
during COVID, it was because dangerous pathogen. And
before that, it was some lone shooters. And
now, you know, it's just like the same
the same solution for every problem regardless. You
know? How to this is why this is
why I keep you know, we always, how
does that not seem? I think it is.
I think everybody sees it. I think we're
well past this point where anybody's falling for
this. Not really. You know? But there's reasons
people are trapped in these ideological bubbles. That's
really what I think the vast majority of
this comes down to right now. Yeah.
So here here is a couple of things
I wanted to highlight. We just had to
organize this real quick.
Interestingly enough, so continuing that first part of
it, I wanna I do wanna make a
point about cannabis that got brought up recently
because I I feel like it overlaps with
this very conversation
because of not, like, not just the tech
toe the technocratic tiptoe that I called it
in that show. It it was more it
was about the the the technological side of
it. But it's also about the, you know,
the the self amplifying shots, the nanotechnology,
the food control, the RNA in food and
all that. You know, that's I really make
sure people watch that show out there because
it is a there's a lot in there.
It's like four hours, but there's a lot
that that, you know, connects it. Oh, by
the way, I'm gonna be doing a, I
might have said this at the beginning, a,
a report of that
for, Solari report, for their legislative report.
So Katherine Austin Fisk is gonna we're I'm
gonna do, like, an hour report on that
so you guys can look forward to that.
That'll be coming out in the near future
of that show, basically, but I'll have to
kinda truncate it down.
Here's a clip that I'll play real quickly.
This is from Big Brother Watch
on the same point of, like, the biometric
technocratic stuff. It doesn't seem fair. Just it
doesn't seem legal. We asked the public about
what their thoughts about the passport photos, and
you may not know this out there, being
subverted into facial recognition databases used for surveillance.
Right? Freedom, liberty, winning. You know? They're just
scooping up everything and giving it to Israel
too. Don't forget because they have a memorandum
of understanding around the AI direction. They have
access to all this data.
Here's the clip.
Far off from people being
dragged out of their beds in the middle
of the night because the computer has said
they've done something which they haven't. British passport
and immigration databases are being used by the
police for mass facial recognition searches. So when
we went to a passport office and told
people their personal data was being used for
surveillance,
it's no surprise that the public thought of
this. Yeah. I don't think it's a good
thing. And I think use of kind of
AI
to do stuff like that is we're going
into quite dangerous territory. Is it just gonna
be the average person who's just gonna be
dragged in for something because you look like
somebody or you're in a place or something?
Whereas the people who they are after, they
haven't got their passport. The government think that
they can, you know, run around and do
whatever they want pertaining to these,
images, and it doesn't seem fair. It doesn't
seem just I would say it doesn't even
seem legal. I don't know whether the statistic
that we are the most watched people in
in the world. Correct.
I have no access to that kind of
verified information, but I could see that we
are certainly in in a top maybe 10.
And you wonder, you know, who is more.
There's a there's a genuine debate on, you
know, like, whether US versus The UK because
it's pretty crazy. UK is insane in that
regard. You know? Yeah.
Oops. That's the that's for a later point.
If we get to that, some Israel stuff.
But so this
was Big Brother watch. On top of that,
here's drop site news. Hundreds of former Israeli
spies are working in big tech. Database shows.
Our audiences already know this, you know, but
it's like, it just doesn't stop being obvious.
And it's not it's not
every you know, it's very specific control structure
stuff. And it's Israeli,
spies, Israeli unit 8,200 intelligence connected through these
things. A $25,000,000,000
deal is the latest acquisition to strengthen the
link between The US tech sector and Israeli
intelligence. Like, they're not even hiding this right
now. You know? Authentics and Twitter. Like, it's
just it's in your face across the board.
You won't need an ID anymore under TSA's
new pilot program at 14 airports. And we
all know what this means, your biometrics.
Don't worry. It's gonna be easier. You can
scan your biometrics. You know? It's like this
is sprinting in this direction. New Orleans called
out for a sketchiest use of facial recognition
in the in it's all rolling out around
the country as we speak. Big Brother satellite
capable of zooming in anyone, anywhere from space
to set launch in 2025.
Trump's Pentagon plans to create a domestic civil
disturbance quick reaction force with hundreds of National
Guard troops to swiftly deploy to US cities
over all over the country. Who cares about
the legalities or, you know, the the National
Guard being deployed across state lines? But, see,
this is where these merge together. Right? So
they're using big tech,
Israeli infiltrated big tech to spy on you
all the time and have now we're having
rapid deploying Gestapo forces put out to stop
you from protesting. That's what this really is.
Pentagon would plan to create military reaction force
for civil unrest, which means a protest. If
you read it yourself, they're making it clear.
Trump has said that. In fact, comment on
that for me, and I'll grab a clip
about the protest. What do you think about
that?
Well,
again, this is just this is stuff that
he's been talking about for years that he
wants to do, would like to do, and
now it's coming to fruition. When you give
a a wannabe
tyrant
all the toys and tool kits of a
tyrant, what do you think is you know,
you give a monkey a brain, what's it
gonna do? It's gonna hump another monkey. That's
what they do.
That's, you know, or at least the first
thing. And the second thing is they're probably
gonna throw around a bunch of poo at
everything, and that's what we're watching. You know?
Trump gets back here, anybody gets elected, and
then the people get screwed, and then they
start flinging stuff all against the walls and
everything else.
You know, it's always the people that are
left up to clean up afterwards.
Yeah. But or pay the price or get,
you know, covered in food. That's just it.
It's just that's how the business of the
state operates.
And, yeah,
100%,
these guys want to crack skulls.
They're ready for it. They sat, you know,
on the apparent sidelines even though that didn't
really happen either.
You know, during all of the the George
Floyd stuff, there was
everything that happened during COVID when you could
have
found your feet
and stood up for what you believed in,
just sat on the sidelines for that. You
know? So there's a lot of pin up
animosity
among the anti protest sector and the people
that are getting, you know, 50 to $80,000
signing bonuses to sign up for ICE or
any of these other, let's go do martial
law enforcement
apparati.
And we're yeah. I mean, we're we're in
the era of complete distrust in government,
so they have to
like Frank's app to say, the illusion will
continue as long as it's profitable. And as
soon as it isn't, the lights will come
on. Right. And, you know, they'll open up
the curtain to reveal the blank brick wall
behind it where everybody gets lined up to
get shot. Yeah. I'm sure it certainly feels
that way. You know? It's just it's just
it's it's so obvious as these things continue
to trickle forward. You know? And this is
why, you know, you get the
the Knicks orders and Benny Johnson's that just,
like, just clap and scream and jump up
and down, winning. We're doing the best. You
know? And it it's it's it's not even
in line with even a fraction of what
was originally put forward, and they all just
we voted for this. It's like, point out
where this was even brought up. You know
what I mean? Like, there's no this wasn't
even in the conversation. You it's just so
lazy. I think that most people can sense
a problem. Even if they think they or
just desperately want to believe that Trump somehow
will bring it all back to the way
it's supposed to be, that you know they're
uncomfortable. This is wrong. This is not what
we believe, you know, and and it's every
which way you look at it. You know,
whether it's illegal or not, this is authoritarian,
you know, from the top down. This isn't
going through congress. You know, it's like it's
just every which way you look at this.
And so I I wanted to overlap it
with the food point as well.
I just talked about the self amplifying shots,
and we can kinda finish on the shot
the COVID kind of, you know, overlap on
it. Trump admin leans into self amplifying mRNA
shots under guise of ending mRNA and RNA
in food. So on the food side of
it first,
just the that I guess not food necessarily
even though, yes, cannabis can be applied. You
know, you hemp can be used in the
same way. Somebody brought up the idea of
the I guess the re quick quick, breakdown.
The reason I'm bringing this in in association
is in this part of the show, I
go into,
like, removing
food sources, you know, or manipulating food sources
to drive us into other things, like, the
the thought rather. And so one of the
ways I'm looking at is that this whole
cannabis conversation
interestingly fits into this because of what we
talked about over the years of, you know,
GMO cannabis, which I've talked about many times,
that company in Canada that got the first,
allowance to make GMO cannabis, and it was
one that was trying to put pharmaceuticals in
in plants. You know? So I've always been
worried about what that would mean and what
we even know is what's even going on
there. So this came out.
It's
Mario Nafel and the wrestling. Trump buys marijuana
reclassification.
And all it's really talking about at the
end of the day is making it say
schedule three. And I'm just like, gosh, it's
so stupid, this whole thing. And he came
out before this was back in 2024
saying, just gonna sum it up quickly that
he wants to make it,
schedule three. You know? Saying, I believe it's
time to make the knee to end the
needless arrest and incarcerations for a small amount.
Okay. Well, you're not even doing that, though.
Schedule three would still be a crime. And
on top of that, you're not the reality
of what cannabis is, that's still not even
valid. You know? It's like Yeah. It's the
medical use aspect. I mean, every I can
go over all of it. In fact, I'll
bring up my top ten one.
But
it's a weird thing in first in first
that this is kind of what's being stated
that he's somehow gonna change this, which I
almost don't even think that'll happen. Right. Overlapping
it with DC,
Trump says that marijuana this decriminalization
opened the door to disorder in DC. So
it's like, he's still this old, like, republican
mindset on it. You know? Then Trump weighs
reclassification of a less less dangerous.
You see, you know you know exactly where
I'm going with this. I'm sure this would
frustrate you as well. Yeah. It's just it's
why are we taking you know, it's taking
with RFK. You said it's bad. You said
it's killing people. Why is it still there?
We don't want these ridiculous half measures to
appease us. That's not the answer because my
final point, it seems to be if it's
less dangerous and they still have it restricted,
but we're gonna allow it for you, it's
going to be manipulated through the government. It's
going to be exactly what I'm worried about,
and it'll be used in the exact same
way because it's still functioning through the government.
So what do you think? I I think
you're absolutely correct, and I'm I'm going to
give another truncated answer because
my my delivery guy is showing up right
now. Oh, good. I do have to go
take care of that. But, no, this is
just this is solidifying
corporate cannabis. It's solidifying
hedge fund back cannabis. And Right. What it's
going to do at a schedule three is
add
more
constrictions for how businesses operate because then they'll
have to comply within that and people might
have to reregister their businesses. They might not
have the funds for it depending on, you
know, what the the squeeze is on it.
And so you'll just see the consolidation
of corporate cannabis, and then I'll be back
in, like, a minute and a half or
something like that. Before yeah. Just frustrating. You
know? It's
we we talked about cannabis for so long.
Oh, did I even bring that up? Make
sure you guys saw that too.
In case you wanted to dive in further.
And I've I've periodically gone into this in-depth.
You know, on this is where this site
largely began around cannabis law reform.
Very passionate about this, and it has nothing
to do oh, I shouldn't say nothing, but
has it's largely to do with the reality
of the plant, the whole plant, the medicinal
purposes. Blend it up and put it in
the shake and drink it. That's the whole
point that I'm I'm saying to people when
they go, you just wanna smoke cannabis. Yeah.
That too, by the way, because, you know,
liberty and all. The point is the lie
around this, one of the biggest lies we've
ever been told because it connects to so
many things where our you know, in many
ways, our future has been stolen from us
because of the important is the important nature
of cannabinoids
in naturally occurring in breast milk for, you
know, in the processes that allow the the
suckling process. Like, these things are inherent
in our in our species.
It's not a joke. It's just in it's
wild. The point is top 10 marijuana myths
that no one should believe, and it's pretty
much all the ones you'll hear from ridiculous
people left and right. It's crazy.
So I'll include that for you. But my
point in bringing it all up was just,
you know, one, the the interesting way people
frame this when clearly he's not pro. This
is it's a political point to be used.
That's what it seems like to me. But
overall,
this one says, not not that I trust
CNN's reporting, but on this, the off chance
is true, I'd encourage the White House to
nix it. Liberalizing
the law around Haitian oregano
gives big Kim Kardashian energy, not the sort
of thing people voted for in in, November.
That this was just her saying, yes. We
did vote for this November. Trump campaigned on
schedule three. Like so it didn't even seem
that they fully grasp what was being said
and and why, but ultimately creates a structure
of controlling this. And my point is that
whether, you know, what they might do to
do to it. See if this pops
up.
Yeah. This is an old article. I don't
even remember if you know, this is from
a long time ago. I wrote this
in 2035.
Cannabis may already be genetically modified
and was Prairie
Plant Systems Inc. Oh, yeah. See, they're not
even a company more. Look, I I removed
the link. They it or at least that
the link was dead and wasn't there anymore.
The point is the company was trying to
put pharmaceuticals
inside these plants, and they were the ones
that got tapped for making GMO cannabis all
the way back then. You just wonder what
might be how it might be used.
And then last on this kind of segment
is,
Noxy saying, are you willing to sacrifice your
liberty for security? And you know there's a
saying for that. You deserve neither.
Billionaire Larry Ellison says a vast AI fueled
surveillance system can ensure citizens will be on
their best behavior. We've talked about this many
times. 2024
said about police, said about you. And so
this is the world they're building. Now if
that's just the world for now because Democrats
broke it, well, does that change the reality
of what people like Larry Ellison are saying,
who are literally tapped into the highest level
of power within his administration? No. It doesn't.
It's going this way regardless of what narrative
you tell yourself to make yourself feel like
it might not be coming going the way
we all see it going. And I'll again,
oh, and this was, these were just oh,
I didn't bring these up earlier, but the
show we did about Washington DC in part,
you understand that.
Three GOP led states to send hundreds of
national guards, we we mentioned that earlier,
to DC, which is a violation.
Same thing here.
Now what what we were gonna briefly just
point out, I'll include in the show notes
since it's here. I don't know if you
guys see any more information on this, but
we did see
reports going around of
bombings and and explosions in Iran.
And and this somehow, you know, be being
Israel being responsible, I wasn't able to necessarily
confirm that, but it is interesting that it's
happening. Right? That there that at this time,
it seems, you know, if they if they
spin this out right now again, all that's
gonna do is lead to the breakdown of
everything that's happening probably by design. That's what
Israel does. Just what I was saying about
Ukraine, that's what they do. They if if
Israel doesn't want this to go this way,
they will break it down.
Now let's talk about some mRNA
and self amplifying before we wrap here today.
Just wanna reiterate a couple points that I
think are relevant. In
case you forgot, by the way, we did
this show, same thing, or this one here.
Oh, let me forget to put that in
the show notes for you.
This one here. Trump admin leans into self
amplifying mRNA. I've got some extra updates for
this that you might find relevant.
If you don't remember the show, the point
was the $500
contract, which, by the way, anybody in the
chat have any insight? Because I'm I still
have yet to see a single one of
those 22 contracts canceled.
We heard a lot about the 22 can't
you know, 500,000,000 in contract. We're canceling it,
ending mRNA. Not what's happening. It was clearly
a head fake. But even on top of
that, I still have not seen no 22
that were canceled, which I thought would be.
The point was, if you remember,
they're telling you that's that Amplitude Therapeutics and
Arcturus,
those two companies are going to be allowed
to continue the shot they're making.
And one of them is an mRNA self
amplifying COVID nineteen shot. Another one is an
mRNA self self amplifying bird flu shot.
And Amplitude also making a self amplifying COVID
shot. That's what they're allowing to continue. So
first, they're not stopping mRNA, even COVID shots,
because they're continuing those right there. Secondarily,
it says very clearly,
other uses of the mRNA technology within the
department are not impacted. So, you know, in
relation to food or any number of other
things they're using them for, that is also
continuing. So we clearly have these normal ones
continuing. We have self amplifying shots, which seem
to be continuing on top of that, which
is not, like, a third category, but they're
also continuing. So and the $500,000,000
that they're removed, it was earmarked for COVID
shots anyway.
And they're now using it to make COVID
shots because that's what it's going toward. It's
going toward this direction.
They already told you that. So here's that
I'll include for you. Now oh, oh, and
also on top of that, we also mentioned
that, doctor Sherry Tenpenny pointed out that they're
now making a and and are using a
brand new self amplifying RNA rabies vaccine for
dogs.
See? It's not going away, and it seems
that they're just aggressively leaning into self amplifying
as if that's not the same thing even
though it is in the same wheelhouse for
sure.
And and here's the the actual link so
in case you wanted to prove it, which
you always should. The first and only companion
animal rabies vaccine built on RNA particle technology.
That is currently coming out through the Donald
Trump administration. But, again, as you if you
understand the reality of it, just your government.
Left and right, it's all really an illusion.
Informed New Jersey nurses,
beginning this week,
AstraZeneca has launched FluMist.
FluMist Home, a direct to your door at
home delivery service for flu mist. And we've
talked about flu mist before.
The aerosolized
injection kinda or rather, you know, inoculation
discussion.
This means the vaccine can now be ordered
online and mailed to your homes.
Ask yourself, is that some is that even
remotely line up with what RFK Jr. Was
telling you before?
Maybe you think it does. I don't think
it does. I think this is the same
problem.
In fact, let me just double check real
quickly to see if I've got that in
there. I I know we've talked about it
before.
But remember,
Donald Trump is the one that brought in
the $50,000,000,000
investment from AstraZeneca
to make manufacturing in this country. And now
we have AstraZeneca's flu shot continuing to be
distributed and made in this country.
Let me look real quick.
See if I have another article to reference
for you guys.
Looks like this one, that's from today.
Look at that. See. I'm telling you. You
know? See. As usual,
we're breaking these things down ahead of the
curve because we're paying attention.
This one was this is from 2022.
Nasal flu jabs cause strep.
Look at that.
Right? And this is the same conversation. This
is this is when they were it hasn't
been out. They were working through they're studying
it. They were testing it, and we found
out that it was also causing strep throat.
But and plenty more, by the way, so
I'll include this for you to check out.
But here's the interesting part.
Many people have broken this down, and here
are the links for you right from AstraZeneca.
Unvaccinated individuals who are close to those vaccinated
with flu mist,
the newly FDA approved at home nasal flu
vaccine from AstraZeneca
might unknowingly be vaccinated without their consent due
to shedding of four synthetically modified
live attenuated viruses. So they're still synthetically
modifying. Right? They're still manipulating these things. These
are not just as I mean, even like
we said, even the original dynamic, the whole,
you know, cell version that they're talking about,
that has plenty of its own problems,
but it's kind of a bastardization of both
at this point.
Sneezing shortly after administration could also theoretically expel
as this was not studied. Trace amounts of
nonviral vaccine components, including
gent gentamicin
to nearly
to nearby individuals before they cleared from vaccine
person's nose. Now this is directly from their
own study.
Here's a a breakdown
from doctor
Mary Taliboten. FluMist vaccine approved for human use.
And, guys, it's riddled with all of the
same things that we've been calling out since
COVID nineteen.
I mean, she goes she goes right down
through it. I'll probably do this more so
on a on a show on short no
time.
Look at this. Pregnancy. FluMist is not absorbed
system
systemically
following intranasal administration, and maternal use is not
expected to result in fetal exposure to the
drug. Great. Not expected. FluMist is not absorbed
system systemically by the mother following intranasal administration,
so they're claiming you can give this during
pregnancy, which is like everything else.
Fertility.
FluMist has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic
or mutagenic, but but, yeah, but take it
while you're pregnant.
You know, it's like, this is the same
thing every time. These are the things that
RFK Jr. Called out in the past.
And she goes over it. You know, the
flu mist is not approved for children. You're
gonna 24 of age, but I'm willing to
bet you anything, it will be pushed on
them regardless just like we saw during COVID
because the benefits outweigh the risks. It's always
the same logic, but you can read through
for yourself. It's the same problems.
And she points out the first self administered
vaccine
first self administered vaccine is a live flu
virus being sent through the mail that the
recipient can shed for at least twenty eight
days.
According to their research, by the way, what
could go wrong?
It's just you back there Stevie, I'm a
comment. This is you know, just in case
you missed it, we're just simply talking about
the flu mist conversation.
And and the point to AstraZeneca's
flu mist that is now being shown by
based on which, you know, Trump brought in
AstraZeneca for the, infrastructure
and it being shown to both shed as
well as be untested properly for pregnant women.
And and, you know, even though they're
telling people they can use it in that
way and ultimately that it is shedding and
it's being, you know, so and and, we
had talked about this back in 2022, the
idea that these nasal flu jabs were already
being shown to have problems. You know, have
you heard any more on this? What are
your thoughts? Well, this is just the development
of technology that they've been trying to put
out for several years now. I'm remembering the
global health security report that was issued by
Hopkins
that had a whole section on,
self spreading vaccines,
on mist based, on
agriculture based
Mhmm. Various different gene therapies and, you know,
vaccinations and, you know, stuff like that. And
that was 2021
when they released that report.
And so this is yeah. The we're we're
seeing that hit the public. I'm sure they've
been in development for quite a long time,
if not already
on the open market for quite a long
time. And now because,
even politicians,
were referring to
the COVID shot as, like, the jab and
stuff like that and the shot.
I think that the
urge to develop
non needle based forms of,
you know, transferring the product has been a
top priority.
And I'm sure that they'll get most of,
if not all of the approval they need.
Well, yeah. I mean, it's already there. You
know? That that that the these things I
mean, these things don't seem to ever really
go through,
like, obviously, well before RFK Jr. Pointing these
things out. Like, the proper whether placebo tested.
Like, he he has been rightly so calling
these things out for a super long time.
And yet, more than once now, even the
placebo point, they rolled out a shot that
wasn't tested to the gold standard placebo.
It's just so insulting to our intelligence that
they will stand there, you know, or or
say we're ending gain of function and then
literally write down that they're not doing that
but becoming the world's leaders and the ones
they like, you know, or any number of
things. We're closing USAID. No. No. You're really
not. Know, it's just it's just infuriating. We
have to keep going through it. It never
stops. But the the overlap to this is,
you know, I I'm leaning in the same
direction. Like, I I I did these shows
around,
Ralph Barrick, that they funded research on coronavirus
induced myocarditis. That's easy to prove it's from
his own curriculum, but they also worked to
aerosolize it in the caves in China, also
right out of his own curriculum. We have
this study from MIT, dual use, new aerosolized
mRNA delivering nanoparticles can vaccinate or they can
eliminate. You know? It's just all these overlapping
points. Not to say that we know necessarily
that that, well, for one, mRNA in the
shot doesn't appear to be the case, I
don't think. But on top of it, the
idea just that
aerosolized I mean, all these things being problematic
in the direction of where the research comes
from, what they were trying to accomplish with
COVID nineteen, and now they're just kind of
sidestepping into the same problem. You know? It
just it makes me very suspicious about what
their agenda is. And I guess because our
RFK is in the position, it's a lot
of people will choose to, I guess, not
even consider that. You know? It's it's concerning.
Yeah. Because when the it's just when people
aren't looking, that's when,
you know, usually the worst stuff gets done.
Now I did they are getting more brazen
about announcing the atrocities they're planning on committing
and unveiling, getting a little bit more bold,
but that's because I think mistakenly,
they're overconfident
in how captured the country is.
You think? I mean, I I feel like
it's more desperation. I mean, they must know.
They're not they're not that stupid. They've got
the same insight. They could look at the
platform. You know? Like, maybe maybe a like
a Trump or a you know, the the
I could see them on their own time
being completely lost in their own echo chamber.
But from, like, the real string pullers, you
know, I I don't think they're con I
think they're very aware. I think that's why
a lot of this is happening. You know?
So it depends on, I guess, where how
informed you think the Trumps of the world
actually are.
Yeah. I mean, I I do think that
most of those people live in a a
bubble of yes men. Yeah. Yeah. And that
once they're outside of it, you know, then
it's
starting to see things a little bit more
clearly than crisis of conscience,
then is there an opportunity for me to
drift off of this? And then, you know,
that's usually the way that it goes, but
some people actually do become
legitimate, outspoken critics,
from the inside of the administration.
Catherine being one of those people. Right. You
know? Right. So it does happen. I know
it happens. It's just it's a little bit
more way more Michael Flynn's than Catherine Austin
fits is out there, and I wish it
was the other way around. Yep. I agree.
Well and and here's an example of one.
You know? Like, so Jay Bhattacharya came out
as, you know, critical. You know? And there's
a lot of moments where he felt like
he was pushing back, but, you know, dip
and, you know, maybe he maybe he
has good intentions but believed this is the
path. You know? It's just I I just
it's hard. As Sasha Ladipova
says, quoting Jay Bhattacharya, still, I do not
believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm
or
on the one hand or or or mass
harm on the one hand or saved fourteen
million lives on the other. These estimates swing
wildly based on speculative modeling, not concrete evidence.
A recent modeling study concluded that the global
coronavirus vaccination campaign saved two point five million
lives between 2020 and 2024,
mainly among the elderly, which is just absurd.
The scientific controversy over vaccine effect on mortality
rages on, and she just says go to
hell, like, calls them out for you know,
it's this wishy like,
we need to be able to take a
stance on the reality of this. The even
their own science shows the reality of how
dangerous this was. And so if even people
like this who are in there, supposed to
be, like, the token showing you they care
about your opinion, It just kills me how
these things are the most dangerous thing I've
ever seen put in front of people as
a product. You know? It it's just shocking,
and still you get these kind of responses.
It's alarming. You know? And here here's a
here's a clip from,
Well, wouldn't Jay Bhattacharya,
Peter Thiel's best buddy when they were undergrads
at Stanford? Yeah. There's definitely many overlaps. You
know? It's but, see, to me, there's plenty
I'm I'm sure that Peter Thiel can be
tied back to plenty of people that might
not necessarily be,
you know, willfully
deceiving people, you know, if that's what we
think is happening. But I think it's on
on its on its face, you can see
these people who are, you know,
they're in they're immersed in the same data
that we are. And they come out of
this acting like what we don't really know
is I just I'm you know, even being
objective about this, it's like that I'm just
it doesn't fly for me. We this is
one of the most provable things I've ever
studied I've ever gone through on this show.
These things are killing people, You know? And
the whole world seems to know that. And
so it just makes you really worried about
where that's going. You know? Here here is,
a couple more things I wanna show on
this.
This is,
doctor,
Bakhti.
Remember, whenever we played that clip,
I think it was 2020 he came out,
and he said all gene based vaccines. And
I I I can actually probably find it
in here real quick.
And it's important to see how, you know,
people like this deserve so much credit. The
continuity,
you know, that that he here it's right
here. That he's been saying this from the
moment this came out, put his career on
the line when it was dangerous, dangerous, well
before even most independent media, and still, now
he's evolving it to make it even more
alarming. But here's what he said. We're just
the beginning. All gene based vaccines,
independent of manufacturers,
produce the same result
in the vaccinees.
He has looked at fifteen
in the last four days. The number has
been increased to seventy
individuals who died after vaccination.
These will be who died at home.
You get it. It goes on for a
minute. He's basically saying that anyone, regardless of
g whatever category, whether it's AstraZeneca or area,
all gene based vaccine are going to hurt
you. That's what he's very adamant about. Here
is the new one. We're now
introducing
an agent
so called vaccines,
which are,
they are blinding the minds of people, because
these vaccines are making people stupid.
They are making people lose their intelligence.
And this is the most dangerous part of
all. These vaccines are killing people. You have
your myocarditis,
you've got your strokes, heart attacks.
These are all terrible. You've got all these
athletes that are dying,
you've got all these young people that are
dying,
very bad. But
the worst thing
is that those billions
that have been injected
are losing their minds.
This is something that people don't realize,
and they're becoming
more and more controllable
because they cannot say no.
It's fantastic.
I mean, think about the arc from someone
like that, a scientist. That's like that's like,
and and so this is not, like, from
today, but it's just we haven't played on
the show before. It's it's, what's his name?
Doctor Yeaten. Michael Eden coming out and saying,
like, you know, and he was you could
see he was, like, almost uncomfortable in using
it, but he's like, I don't know what
else to call this but evil. You know,
because he sees the full picture. And it's
just like, wow. Like, somebody like that who,
you know, goes into, like, you know, something
evil is not a scientific argument, you know,
but that's it's just crazy for him to
argue,
you know, with I mean, I'm I'd like
to talk to him again today. I should
actually try to set that up with, like,
where he now sees it. But the idea
that, like, people are losing
their cognitive ability to to resist control, it's
like, you know, is he arguing that they're
that this is part of the design or
just that they're
through, like, now not resisting? They're becoming more
pliable? You know? It's just it's just a
it's a it's a crazy one. Anecdotally,
when I was living in Vegas a few
years ago with our our neighbor,
this old timer named Tommy,
who was obviously
a connected guy back in the day. Obviously.
He he was talking to me and Teal
one day
about how the girl that he was with,
like, completely
changed post vaccination.
Did you mean Teal?
Pardon? Who'd you say? Teal? Yeah. Teal who
cohost, Blunt Force with me on Mondays. Oh,
got you. I thought go ahead. Sorry. I
thought you meant somebody else. Yeah. No. T
e a l, like the color. Yeah.
But,
he was saying that she went through, like,
an entire personality change. Like, you know, hobbies
and things that she loved, she had no
interest in. And That's crazy. She acting a
little, you know, acting like a little irrationally
at first and then increasingly irrationally.
And,
I mean, just really did go through a
a mental and emotional
shift Right. On on the other side of
it,
to the point to where, like, they wound
up ending their relationship.
And,
you know, they've been together for, like, eight
years or something like that. And I I
know that's not the only person because, again,
anecdotally,
you know, I've heard similar stories from a
handful of other people, and then I've read
stories about,
whatever people think long COVID is is
seriously
affected people, on a a mental level and
an emotional level and even a cognitive processing
level. Mhmm. God. It's just it's so you
know, just it's like Kath that's why Catherine
calls it the great poisoning. And it's not
just about the shots either. You know? It's
like it's just so dis this is why
people have such a hard time even even
if they see the evidence and agree with
you of, like, fully accepting the the breath
of what that shows. You know? Like, that's
terrifying. You know what I mean? Like, the
reality of what that shows you is that
your government hates you or at the very
least is so in so lacking doesn't so
has so little concern about you or your
life or your your families that they're really
just doing whatever they can, you know, and
that they're doing or or even worse, that
they're doing this as a deliberate experiment to
try to manipulate you into being some kind
of passive mindless automaton.
You know, it's just it's it's unnerving, you
know? And to see the what to do
that that one's example of somebody who just
becomes a different person,
it's just, you know, it's how do you
even fight something like that? You know? Especially
when we're getting into the world of what
we're talking about of the self amplifying shots,
the self spreading shots. And again, for those
that are you know, don't know this, these
are real things. They've been studying this and
working on stuff like this for for a
very long time. And, you know, the idea
of that or even going into the nanotech
or neuroscience, it's like, that's this is like
I always say, this is the stuff that
truly keeps me up at night. You know?
Like, the the the the body of that
and what you do against that, like, especially
since I kind of already think we're there.
I don't know. I really don't know, but
we should certainly keep talking about it. I
think I think on a level, we're there,
but I don't think that the
performance
of the technology
is anywhere near
50 to to 75%,
of what they would like it to perform
at. That's what I think.
Yeah. Well yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And the last,
you know, five years have definitely been a
test phase. Yeah. I way back at the
beginning of the lockdown,
I was calling it a live fire exercise.
Right. Right. And because it had all of
the hallmarks of one to me, and that's
what it felt like, especially with the military
type rollout of warp speed and everything that
that happened going forward with that. It really
did look to me
like it was a live fire exercise, and
that's kind of what we're seeing play out
with all of the chips and then,
all of the the tracking and biometric identification.
It doesn't we know this. We've talked about
this forever. Facial recognition is horrendously unreliable. Right.
Especially
if you're black or if you're Asian.
Tremendously
unreliable technology.
So it's not like they really can deploy
it at scale
with effectiveness, but they can deploy it at
scale as a fear amplifier
Yeah. And as a control amplifier,
and then leave it up to whomever to
battle it out in court down the road
if somebody's misidentified.
Yeah. I mean and this is why I
feel more and more it makes more sense
the idea that there was multiple things happening
simultaneously.
You know? Control groups and different different parts
of it because there really were I mean,
e even just the idea of the different
shots themselves. You know? Like, that itself could
be the difference on these and each one
meant to you know? It's and it's it's
so easy to dismiss these things as something
that's not possible. I mean, look. The history
of that, every point of that, whether
they're
willing to experiment on you, obvious. 239
times throughout the history, you can prove, you
know, or whether or not there's, you know,
enough ability to control something like that without
that becoming a known topic. You can prove
that these things are not that difficult, you
know? So it's, like, weird that people are
so willing. Again, I think it comes back
to the willing to dismiss it. I think
it comes back to the, you know, if
I don't acknowledge this, if I don't accept
this, it's not real. You know? Like, I
just can't live in a world where that's
what's happening when I'm supposed to believe Donald
Trump is saving me from the big, bad
deep state. You know? It's like, even though,
yes, that does exist, clearly they're not, though.
Clearly they are. Like, that's what I keep
today. I was making fun of people. I'm
like, you know, the fact that you like,
listen to what you're saying right now. Like,
you think you're the rebel fighting the deep
state, you're literally parroting the power structure's argument
and supporting them using it against the populace.
Like, you're not the rebel, man. You are
you are supporting what you think you're fighting
right now. You know? And I just hope
that breaks through to some people.
But let's
What was that? Slowly. I said slowly, but
I think so. Yeah. No. I you know
I do, man. You know I do. It's
just it's about it's about reaching people that
need to see it, and I think the
ones that are keeping
the the kind of,
you know,
crumbling partisan control structure, keeping it tipped up
with popsicle sticks and bubble gum, you know,
keeping it going. You know, I think I
think they're the ones that are they don't
need to hear this. They already know, and
they don't care. You know? They're invested in
the status quo. And so until we can
somehow break that model a little bit more,
they're they're they're keeping it going, which is
just depressing. You know? And and with with
I'll almost end on this note with things
like this. I thought this was really interesting.
Ozempic.
We could probably talk about this on, on
Tuesday as well, but, you know, it's funny
because you call Ozempic Jones, and you just
wonder how many people out there are are
using something like this. But Hollywood's miracle drug
just destroyed eighteen hundred lives. Ozempic users developed
a horrifying disease overnight, and and it can't
be cured. And you can read more on
it. The all the information is down below,
and I simply just added to it. Which,
by the way, I do wanna talk to
a shout out to,
oh, is that me playing in the background?
Is that you? No. That was I'm sorry.
I got that. Didn't realize that volume was
on on that. Hold on one second. Let
me dude, this is the
Zoe Smith. I just wanna make sure I
got her I I have somebody to remember
her last name. Zoe Smith in the medic
the we've interviewed her more than once, you
know, the medical, kill thrill cult. Mhmm.
She's done some work on methylene blue. Yeah.
Because this is that's what I'll read what
I wrote really quickly. I said, how long
until we get the same revelation about methylene
blue, which I believe is kind of already
there? Why anyone would ever decide to this
is so important. Whether COVID nineteen shot or
whatever else, why anybody would ever decide to
jump into using something that is being highly
politically promoted while having limited info is beyond
me. Like, didn't we just go through this?
You know, it's like it's weird. And it's
and especially after what most became aware of
during the COVID nineteen illusion. So she did
do some work on Methylene Blue and I
have seen some stuff coming out about these,
you know, problematic overlaps, but this was one
too that got, like, shoved in people's faces.
And now, you know, it's it's just weird,
isn't it, that we even can fall for
this stuff still? And I think it's more
than just the big you know? You know,
one last point I think it shows me
is the people like Jones, the rest are
it's kinda like the way I've seen congress
in some ways. They think that they're above
it and see it, but they're being played
just like everybody else. You know? Like, it's
a lot of that. But what do you
think about that? I well, the
the stuff that
I've looked into
on methylene blue,
is that 95
to 98%
of it
is
coming from
some facility in China that nobody has any
sort of idea,
you know, what's in it, you what the
conditions of the facility
your facilities are.
Most of it
is just, you know,
not even third party manufactured. It's like fifth
party manufactured, and it's being touted by all
these various different influencers. Now Mariam Hanayan has
a completely different take on it, but apparently,
there's somebody she's been working with for, like,
fifteen years
who she, you know, swears
that,
you know, it's a quality product. And there
are in limited cases, you know, beneficial uses
to it
in conjunction with a bunch of other things.
And at that point, you kinda get lost
in supplement land. Like, is it the thing
that I'm taking? Is it the combination of
the other things? Is it placebo effect? What's
really going on here? But things that we
do know about it seem to mostly have
negative connotations as far as that goes. Yeah.
Well, on that note and, you know, and
and she's somebody if she has that opinion,
look at what she has to say about
it. Right? Mary, she she is somebody that
you know, she I don't she's not somebody
that's gonna be out there screaming things just
to, you know, she believes that. Right? So
let that matter. Look at what she has
to say about it. Consider her opinion. What's
interesting though and and I've yet to go
really deep on this other than some some
of the points that people pass my way,
and I and I plan on it. But
that, you know, it's not to say that
it's not beneficial in some way. Right? So
maybe from her perspective, she's had some kind
of, you know, positive change, which doesn't then
mean it's still not also potentially dangerous. You
know what I mean? Because it's also not
everybody taking it. So definitely consider all the
different opinions. But so the the overarching argument
is that there's, you know, or rather my
argument is it's untested,
lacking of information, and yet being shoved on
you for a political reason just feels like
too obvious. You know? And it's just a
weird kinda thing here, but I think that
a lot of these things are,
you know, like experimentation
in some way. You know? But, like, that's
just a gut feeling. But, like, you see
him RFK putting it in in his drink,
you know, on a very public congressional thing.
It's like they very well knew that that
would be seen and that would get discussed.
You know? And so it's like and by
the way, Jones is all about it. He
said he takes it all the time, and
it's like, I talk fast. People I do
it all the time. And I and I
started noticing
some of the way like, I'll I'll rush
through things, and I won't finish my sentence.
I'm watching him talk this lately. I'm like,
it's almost like it's like an alarming version
of it, you know? Like, you can't even
hear half the time. I hope I don't
sound that bad all the time. It's like
so it's like you wonder. I know somebody
that does take it that's somewhat close to
me and it's like, I I see that.
It's like it's a you know, they're so
worked up and it's like, that's not necessarily
a good sign, you know, that it's like
this overwork, you know, but it's just it's
very interesting to me. But the overlap of
all these things, you know, it's just like
there's just there's not a shortcut, guys. There
never really is a shortcut. Right? It's about
just doing it the right way for the
right reasons.
Very interesting.
Yeah. I mean, again, there's things that you
can do that, you know,
are beneficial
supplements, beneficial nutrients, stuff that you burn through
during the day that you do need to
replenish at the end of the night that
people don't necessarily think about, magnesium,
potassium, and stuff like that, stuff that your
body really wants and needs. And there are,
you know,
ways to rebuild that, but it's
it
that's not a shortcut. That's just maintenance. You
know what I mean? Right. And so I
which
helps you,
you know, build the kind of body that
you would want or that, you know, you're
working towards
is doing that kind of regular maintenance and
kind of, you know, replenishing your supply of
certain things that you burn off throughout the
day. But I I don't in any way,
shape, or form view that as like a
a chi. I know there's people who are
trying to do that
with everything from, you know, testosterone to Ozempic
and all points in between. And, yeah,
it is more than likely going to wind
up doing much more harm to your body
over the long term then you're gonna see
short term happy results. Yeah. Or or but
or at the very least, just like I
said,
wait to find that information out. Like, have
more. And even then, like we said, so
that study could be wrong. They could be
lying or have money invested in lie. But
at the end of the day, something better
than just a bunch of political narrative. Like,
there are things out there, but it's it's
very limited in what you can find. And
I looked into it just because of that,
and it's like, you know, I it's something
like this. I'm gonna wait
anything to find out whether you know, to
watch the to look at the reaction, look
at what you know, like, steroids, for example.
You know? Everyone thought it was a miracle
drug and it turns out, oh, wait. It's
actually really bad for you. You know? Whether
that was known or not, it's kind of
the same point. You know? It's just as
us, as individuals out there, there's always a
company, a government, a a manipulator, you know,
some crypto manipulator. It's somebody out there always
trying to get you, to manipulate you, to
to play you always.
You know, that's just the way the world
is. So be on guard for that. You
know? Not doesn't mean you have to be
uncomfortable about it, but it's the same point
of questioning everything. Right? Doesn't matter what it
comes from. Doesn't matter if it's someone you
believe in.
Look at it skeptically in a in a
in a normal sense of way. Like, not
like, I think it's hard. People think, like,
that somehow makes you, like,
it's not the same as dismissing everything. Right?
You're just going for your day and things
pop up and you go, could that be
wrong? Sure. Possible. It's like it's normal. It's
like, it's weird how we've been trained away
from, like, the most basic level of objectivity.
That's my my design. Right. Or or in
the media specifically,
like, the it's the extremes of it. It's
either go along with all of it or
just be contrarian for the Internet's points.
And
if you do follow-up on it, it's always
you're speaking to,
the least amount of people in the room
with the most
extreme
endgame scenarios for all of it,
and it's just so disingenuous.
Yeah. You know, that's the best word for
it from a lot of this stuff right
now. It's just, you know, there's so many
people out there who are screening about what
they want. You know? And it's it you
can just sense it. It's the same thing
I said about Elon Musk, by the way,
or when you watch Steven Miller talk about
anything. It's not you could just, like, see
the lazy, like, blithe nature of everything he's
saying. He doesn't believe anything. It's like you
can just tell. He's, like, he's playing he's
saying what he thinks you wanna hear and
it almost gleams in his eyes. You know?
It's like it's so obvious. And Elon Musk
did the same thing. Went out there and,
you know, that's why it was almost hard
to watch when he's out there on stage
playing the MAGA. You know? It's like he
doesn't you can tell. Look at look at
what he's doing now. Look at the weird
shift right away. You know? I'm not even
saying he believes that now. Question what these
people are doing. You know? They don't they're
using your momentum and your opinions because they
need you. You know? And the TeamSport politics
influencers,
that's that's that's everything. You know? These billionaires
need you for plenty of things, but not
everything. They're billionaires.
These team sport manipulators, they're, like, their whole
world gravitates around whether they can keep you
thinking that they're on the right team. You
know? It's just it is disingenuous every which
way you cut it. You know? But that's
that's why you're all here, though. You want
people that whether right or wrong and, you
know, look, our track record speaks for itself.
You know, we're very clearly been above almost
you know, we get the story right very
clearly. And if ever there's a time what's
wrong, we talk about that. We correct it.
But the point is just, you know, the
consistency.
Right? The the the doing things for the
right reasons, following through, sticking to your principles.
You know, today more than ever, man. And
I
think everybody out there, that's why you're here,
you know, because there are people that are
you know, they care about that more than
anything. You know? And that's both of us
here. That's the IMA. That's the people we
try to overlap. But one last note thing
on the way out is interesting. Somebody reached
out to me and asked about, you know,
it what was it? The round something roundtable,
I guess, that was funded by
Brock Pierce or something like that. It's some
random company. And they were like, so, you
know, is the IMA funded by roundtable because
that logo is being used on your things?
And I'm like, first of all, no. It's
not.
Nowhere is this little sun logo. I looked
it up. Is that anywhere on what we're
doing? And how many times there's no funding
mechanism. We're weary out of it for things
just like that because now we don't fall
into those traps. Are people trying to pretend
like we're some you know, because that's what'll
happen. They'll try to sabotage the genuine nature
of just trying to report things for no
no return benefit other than just you guys
supporting what we're doing. You know? But just
wanted to say that on the way out,
be on guard because, look, the IMA
is important right now, and it is making
it it influences. It's making it's, you know,
it's showing information in ways that gets across
to people far more than their individual platforms,
it seems. So be ready. People are gonna
come at it just like they did around
the last, you know, selection process. When they're
weak, they lash out. You know? That's what's
happening right now. Nope.
What's the essence?
You're here today and, you know, we're I'm
wrapping up. Anything you wanna shout out on
the way up?
Let's see.
We're gonna have,
Greg Reese on
AM wake up tomorrow. That'll be a fun
conversation.
Yeah. Good things coming up throughout the week.
Of course, you're in every Tuesday.
Who else? Oh, Taylor
Hudak is coming back soon.
And, yeah, everybody's in there quoting zapping now.
But, no, man. Thanks for having me on.
Yeah. I appreciate all of it. And if
you guys are unfamiliar, AM wake up streams
Monday through Thursday, 7AM
to 10AM on the West Coast,
on Rumble, Odyssey,
Substack now,
through the INN network on Twitter,
Bitchu, all kinds of places. Go check it
out. Yeah. Well, I'm I'm glad you're having
Taylor on too. She she's still doing great
work. You know? Just as all we've had
to pull back from just about everything as
you know from you know? But but we
are seeing some positive momentum, by the way,
for those out there getting back to some
more, you know, Robert writing, Taylor interviews or
writing or, you know, all the things that
this we are slowly inching our way back
to where we were. Oh, I should pitch
third at carnival too. Yeah. But Yeah. So
October,
El Paso, Texas.
Whole bunch of local live music and some
live podcasts.
Michael Graves, who fronted the Misfits for a
number of years, is gonna play on Saturday.
Should be a very, very, very good time.
You can go to thirdeyecarnival.com
for,
for more
information on that and tickets.
Nice. And then,
if if I'm if I'm, free, maybe I'll
pop in tomorrow and say hi. But let
if I don't, let let him know that
I bought that book. I bought the the
dream yoga yoga book. Okay. And I'm I'm
I'm trying to, like it's weird. Funny, weird
side note. I haven't even opened it yet.
I haven't I'm planning on reading it. But
since I bought it, I've I've had, like,
a dream every night for, like, the last
week. I don't even know how that makes
sense, but it's just funny that it's, like,
what a, you know, weird kind of synergistic
thing. But I just, you know, let him
know that I'm I'm interested. I wanted to
talk to him about that in the future.
We're we have, I think, something being set
up as well, but I'm looking forward to
his chat because, you know, he he's really
breaking down some good info. I just played
his recent five minute clip about the, what
is it called, police state for your safety
clip. Mhmm. It's a good clip. It's a
good good little mini doc. He just did
a a podcast with, Aaron and Melissa Dykes
from TrueStrings too. Nice. Nice. Put that up.
They're they're prolific right now. Like, the last
so many couple they at least at least
now they're suddenly in my feed. You know?
Maybe that's what's different. But, like, they're just
making great points about things right now. Like,
you know, they've been doing this for so
long, so longer than most. You know? And
and they're right. Like, they put this clip
out about something, and it's just like so,
you know, we're all in this you know,
some of us far more than others like
them. Like, they've they've been they're they've been
calling these things out for so long. Imagine
how frustrating it must be for them to
be like, yeah. What we said fourteen years
ago. You know, it's like a lot of
us are going through that right now in
varying degrees where it's like, you know, it's
these new things are coming out or, like,
you know, Jones jumps out and starts talking
about ticks and Gates funded, you know, eat
stopping you from eating meat vaccines. And I'm
like, you know, first of all, he literally
gleaned that from that people's voice garbage because
that's not actually even what's really happening. It's
like an overlap of stories. But I said
this might as well be a story a
daily wrap up from 2023.
Probably also a show from True Street Media
from five years before that. You know? It's
like Yeah. It's frustrating to see how that
keeps going. Their Plum Island
documentary is still the best thing I've ever
seen in that conversation. You know? But But
it's just it's just interesting how much of
that is happening right now where it's like
either just people trying to kinda co opt
the truth because it's becoming more and more
obvious or trying to, like, draw you back
into things. Even though there's new not new
breaking information, but they're covering it like some
bombshell story to, like, don't look at Epstein,
don't look at Israel, don't look at the
genocide. You know, just it's everywhere you look
right now, but that'll be I'll leave that
with on the way out. But thanks for,
for joining me today, brother. I'll it's it
was nice talking with you on the show.
Heck, yeah. You too. Thanks for having me
on, and we'll we'll see you on Tuesday.
Sounds good. And as always, everybody out there
question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay
vigilant.