Since the outbreak of COVID nineteen, the word
virus has been dominating media headlines as well
as our daily lives.
Did you know that one approach that has
been proposed to control virally transmitted diseases is
by releasing a virally transmitted vaccine.
Unlike traditional vaccines,
infectious vaccines do not require any individual consent.
Infectious solutions are also being developed for food
and agriculture
and are currently making their way through the
regulatory approval process
However, do we really want to intentionally
disperse these modified viruses outside the lab?
Is this the forward march of science
or a mistake?
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 08/10/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
A really important follow-up to something we just
talked about that
wasn't something that I was it was a
gut feeling based on the facts that it
had in front of us around the direction
that the US government was going in in
contradiction to what the Maha movement expected, or
really just the majority of Trump supporters as
well.
This is about self amplifying RNA, which is
something we've talked about. As I'm saying, that
is one article I need to grab from
a long time ago that's relevant, but something
we've talked about for a long time. Not
just self amplifying, but self spreading. And I
started with that clip again because there's an
overlapping point to all of this. If you
remember the insect allies conversation with DARPA and
and while before COVID nineteen, the three the
the free thought project covered that, and we
shared that as well way back when. Same
conversation. There's there's the different elements of all
of this, but we're talking about something that
overlaps with the way that these technologies are
used.
And the RNA conversation, also in food, that
we'll talk about towards the end today,
or the conversation about that in food potentially
and where that goes,
to
me, put it simply,
this is the direction they've shifted into, pivoted
into. And I also argue as I've made
I pointed this out. I don't even know
how many times. The self amplifying technology was
actually
the way the data looks, again, I can
never verify what the data they present is
entirely accurate, but that's, you know, all that
we have in front of us. The data
that was presented around that technology through not
just Pfizer, but all the different companies involved,
self amplifying was one of the first elements,
it seems, that they created, produced, or strove
toward. Then the original
b n t one two b two, I
I remember that. I think that's correct. The
the Pfizer shot, there was two of them,
the ones they primarily went forward with. One
of those, the main one they used was,
in fact, listed as self amplifying
on one of the earliest Pfizer documentation. Now
that's not what they claim now. So that's
for you to decide. But I think it's
really interesting that this has been something that
swirled around this for a long time. Now
self spreading
is about the conversation of actually having a
contagious vaccine, which is what you watched right
there in that clip in the opening. That's
directly from a massive symposium in Europe that
had to this was The US involved. Everybody
was involved in that. Right? It was right
in the beginning and into the opening of
the COVID nineteen illusion.
And that was something and that's why I
point back to the Insect Allies point because
of that is the same thing they applied
to the insect allies conversation before all this
through DARPA. So you see, this has been
swirling around a long time. My point in
saying all of this is that I believe,
which is what I argued on the eighth
when I first saw that clip, as well
as the universal vaccine overlap that has now
been deleted, we'll touch on that today,
I believe that this was what we were
seeing.
This was always if not always now the
direction,
and this is what they're pivoting into. So
as I almost called it a bait and
switch, it almost feels like now that's more
accurate. That it's not just a slight of
hand, it's that they, in fact, were telling
you I guess they both apply, but we're
going in we're getting either going this direction
or we're going away from all of this,
but, in fact, we're actually going deeper into
that side of the conversation. And that's in
that's in regards to actual
the self amplifying direction in and of itself.
What I was hesitating, therefore, is there's two
different directions to go in as well as
that at the point out to start is
that one, they're not actually stopping mRNA. Not
even just regular mRNA. I already highlighted this
from a the HHS post they put out,
which I'll show you again. They make it
very clear, specifically to manufacturers. Off the top
of my head, I think it was Amplitude
Therapeutics
and Ar Arcubus or Arcuturus. I'm forgetting the
name exactly. I'll show them when you get
there. It's a major company.
And, actually, I can just look really quickly
since I have it have it all right
here in front of me. Arcturus is the
name of the company, and they're working on
self amplifying COVID nineteen teen shots, self amplifying
bird flu shots. Two the both of which
I've already shown you. One's from April 2025.
That's the h one n five h five
n one shot. The other one is from
09/30/2024,
both of which are still happening. And both
those companies are working on self amplifying shots,
including COVID nineteen, flu.
So that's happening. That's different than what you
were told. Secondarily, it lists right there that
we're they're actually continuing mRNA in other fields.
Now maybe you don't maybe you're okay with
that. It's not the way it was being
framed, and a lot of people in that
movement didn't know that and still are being
lied to by the screamers at the top
of the paradigm.
So it's important to understand that this is
still happening and then understand that it seems
that as those same things are still happening,
they're also pivoting the new direction
into further down that hole of self amplifying
RNA or SAM RNA. So mRNA, same conversation,
guys.
So we'll talk about that today and where
this continues to go and some of the
different points that are popping up around it,
talking about the RNA in food point at
the end because a lot of people are
arguing, which we also,
you know, discussed around in the last show,
whether this is also one of these directions.
Not just now, but always have been, but
something that they're continuing, and it does appear
that that other category of mRNA they will
continue seems to apply to food.
Now this is not news to people that
have been following this since COVID nineteen and
after. What's interesting is it seems the
there's so many people out there that just
don't want to admit this is happening. I'm
with you. I don't want it to happen.
I was hoping that the $500,000,000
removal of mRNA contracts was gonna be the
beginning of a step in the right direction.
But even with this bad direction, that's still
a good thing. I'm glad there are less
of those out there, but we're just watching
this new pivot. And I'm of the mind
that that's where it's going to go. That
it's going to and this is, again, my
feeling, my point, my gut instinct based on
all the facts that from here forward, all
we're gonna see is an explosion of self
amplifying shots. Now, again, that's not that hard
to predict. We can see that those are
on the in the wings. We can see
that that's where they're leaning. So but, again,
this is
this is why we tend to point these
things out way ahead. Demonstrating my value. Demonstrating
the the value of this platform. Demonstrating the
value of the IMA. Because, you know, the
point is this is why we are consistent.
We have different opinions, but we're prince we're
driven by principle, driven by facts and what
we can prove and not subjective partisan arguments.
And so if you follow this platform, you
already knew this stuff just like you knew
about the COVID stuff long before most people.
So on that note, support this platform, support
independent media. But let's get into this. I've
got limited time today. I'm gonna be interviewing
James Corbett tonight, which will be coming out
tomorrow
around the whole, GiveWP
data breach conversation, which is really I I
wanted to have him on to discuss that
as all as well
as some of the surrounding points around where
it's going and whether he feels that was
sort of targeted just against people trying to
circumvent the normal structure. And I kinda or
maybe maybe it was set up to do
that. We can talk about it tonight. You'll
be seeing that tomorrow. But I have a
limited time, so let's get into it today.
And I'll I'll include this,
his article about this, which is what we'll
be discussing tonight,
entitled Data Leak at Core Report and many
other sites. Make sure you check it out.
It's really important. It's only eleven minutes. It's
worth checking out. And so you know quickly
it has been resolved, but that doesn't mean
that there's not more problems to be found.
So we have to be, you know, observant.
I'm glad somebody found this.
Now couple opening points I want you to
see that I think are
and this one's just I want to include,
but couple of the points that I think
are really interesting, kind of for the same
thing we highlighted just there about, you know,
what we were discussing recently.
Now this is I wasn't familiar with the
Kobesee letter simply saying breaking total US debt
has officially crossed the $37,000,000,000,000
above $37,000,000,000,000
for the first time in history.
You probably already heard this. The point, though,
is just to think about what that means
where we are now. Now unless this goes
shockingly back down the other direction, then we're
clearly not gonna be cutting spending costs. Government's
gonna
grow. I'm sure you're already aware of that,
but for those that are still holding on
to this idea of the golden age, which
may be golden age for them and for
technocrats and Zionists and globalists, but definitely not
for the average person, especially not for the
average American because we're going I mean, we're
sprinting in the same direction. Which, if you
remember back to what we were saying, this
time, the last time, the last administration before
that, what you'll find is the continuation of
the same agendas that the general the government
wants to achieve with different flavors back and
forth to kind of bat the thing up
and down. But, wait, if you look over
a long time, it's consistent. That's what James
called the steps last time that, basically, they
just it's a stepping stone. One administration to
the next. There's all things things swirling around
it, but at the end of the day,
it still goes in the same direction. It's
worth considering that. And on that same note,
this was something we recently put out on
this on the note of winning and and
not really. Over a 100 companies and nonprofits
have now signed the White House's pledge to
America's youth investing in AI education. May maybe
you don't maybe you don't care about that.
Maybe you think that's the best thing for
everybody. Maybe you love AI. The point is
always is that that's not what conservatives who
put Trump in that position were calling for.
If he if he had said that when
he was running, they would have booed him
like they booed him when he's praised the
COVID shot because that is the opposite of
what that that aligns with the great reset
and all the things we're talking about. And,
again, may not about whether you think it's
best or not or whether it is best
or not, but simply showing you that it's
not what they were promised. I think that's
an important thing to highlight. I also agree
that's the last direction we should be going
in. And I put this as sarcasm because
it seemed people asked, like, really? You think
that's right? They don't know the work, I
guess. But I I haven't gone through this.
I thought it'd be interesting really quickly that
I just typed wanted to look at what
I said about winning.
This one I've seen, U US FDA approves
use of Sanofi's,
meningitis vaccine in infants. So I said, the
winning just won't stop. This is for the
podcast, my Twitter account with the different times
I've said winning. Oh, this one where Netanyahu
is saying he's never been closer to The
United States, and he credits that extraordinary achievement
to Trump. Now here's when the Donald Trump
said he's praising AstraZeneca's massive $50,000,000,000
investment in manufacturing
vaccines, mRNA and otherwise, in The United States.
I said this is what winning looks like.
Big tech and AI firms are winning under
the Trump's second administration. I'm not sure what
I meant by this one. Oh, just the
idea that big tech and AI. Right. Because
that's again
not not what people would have expected. Conservatives,
Republicans would have told you that's not what
would happen.
This one oh, yeah. Just making fun of
Catherine for saying that. I honestly didn't skim
down. I thought it'd be fun to look
really quickly. Trump dismisses raising taxes on the
rich because a lot of millionaires would leave
the country.
Hashtag winning. You know, it's like it just
goes on and on. Anyway, you get the
point. I just said call it out, guys.
Call it out. When Trump asked about sending
weapons to Ukraine, he said it's everything. It's
all of them. It's a full compliment. What
was that again about the war being over
and then we wouldn't fund them? You know,
on and on and on. Just be honest.
That's all we need today, guys. Be honest
about what's happening. If you really want it
to be positive and change, then be honest
about it. Now we talked about the DC
points in this last show. Musk and Trump
called to federalize Washington, DC. Now we went
into this in-depth about the worrisome the reality
of what DC is and and and why
some people want it to be, you know,
given statehood for their own per the people
that live there who don't get the same,
you know, voting rights as in in particular.
But the point
is, constitutionally speaking, it's supposed to be congress
has control. And and so the interesting overlap
of this is Trump coming in with the
RD of the executive branch,
taking power of DC, and and then the
rumors swirling about him handing it over to
Peter Thiel. And it kinda does seem like
this is going in that direction and the
conversation of freedom cities and libertarian cities and
fifteen minute states. All same thing as far
as I'm concerned. I just think it's important
to watch this show. But on that note,
I thought this was interesting. This is from
today or, no, yesterday.
On Monday, a press conference will be held
tomorrow
at the White House, Trump, the White House
account rights, which will essentially stop and this
is Trump saying it. Stop violent crime in
Washington, DC.
It has become one of the most dangerous
cities anywhere in the world.
That's frankly, outlandishly ridiculous, but it says it
will soon be one of the safest. No.
Look. I'm there's plenty of crime. It's very
dangerous, like a lot of places in this
country. But to make it only about DC
is because they have an agenda about DC.
It's pretty simple. Hey. Maybe they stop crime
while they turn it into a fifty minute
city. Doesn't change the fact that it was
an agenda, and I think it's easy to
see. Right? It's important to think about that,
but please decide for yourself. And I just
a press conference that will be held at
the White House essentially, will will stop the
crime. The press conference, apparently, will stop all
crime. It's not what he really meant, but
funny how words mean things. He meant that
probably they're gonna have a press conference and
talks about how they're gonna end that. Now
what do you think is gonna happen? Do
you think it's gonna be more police? You
think it's, you know, is that what I
mean, I guess in some cases, conservatives would
largely want that. But overall, this is about
more authority. More, you know,
control of the more
less freedoms. Put it that way. And that's
not what they think they're getting.
Honest people are beginning to see where this
goes. Overlapping with immigration, we'll touch on another
show. Plenty of horrifying things continue to happen.
I don't make a point about that after
the Israel point about where this seems to
be coming from. But overall,
not going in the right direction. Breaking nine
one one says DC police have issued, get
this, a juvenile curfew zone
ahead of his scheduled press announcement.
What is that? Now
something else I just caught wind of is
this weird thing happening in, was it Nova
Scotia and Canada where they're banning people from
going into the woods because of fires and
stuff. Now, honestly, to or to be fair,
I haven't gone too deep on it. I
just kind of saw it as we were
as I was researching today. But I don't
I mean, I honestly don't care about the
logic here if we're talking about a mass
ban on people going into public spaces, especially
into
the how does that not align with everything
we're talking about? Now maybe it's just coincidental.
It's always possible.
But I don't think it's actually about you
fires. I mean, at the end of the
day,
maybe just even top down control. But, really,
there's so many other parts to get into
what people tend to dismiss just about what
it means to be able to go into
nature and what that does to you as
a person, your psyche. But overall, just having
a random argument of it going, you can't
do this today because I said so. Right?
That's you know, like like, it's some kind
of decree from
this is not what freedom looks like, guys.
And the idea that they can just do
that and selectively apply it to certain groups.
I mean, can you imagine if this was
the Democrat? Same old point. It shouldn't stop
it shouldn't matter as much today, but it
does for people that still wanna pretend that
he's not doing the same thing they've always
done with a slightly different slant. So it
really does worry me where this goes. Really,
just think about rationalizing this to build into
whatever they're doing there.
He says,
we're having news conference tomorrow in the White
House. I'm going to make our capital safer
and more beautiful than it ever was before.
Always, always, always. Better than best than best
than ever than anyone ever in the world.
Make America great again, great again. You know,
whatever they keep doing. It's just so silly.
It means nothing. You know? It's just and
and where's the tangible outcome? Anyway, the homeless
have to move out immediately, which is a
weird thing to say. Now you look same
as always. Are somebody there breaking the law?
Okay. Then apply the law. But the idea,
the way that this is going does not
feel like that's what it's about, personally.
And it also I mean, you'll see where
this personally suggests, and I agree. We will
give you places to stay, but far from
the capital. That's interesting. Okay. If the Biden
administration was getting up people that were homeless
and saying, we'll give you places to stay,
what do you think they would say about
that? Socialism.
But he does it, and it's good because
they should be out of there. Funny how
the exact same thing could be framed two
different ways because of partisanship. But it says,
the criminals, you don't have to move out.
We're going to put you in jail where
you belong. Oh, and how do you know
they're criminals exactly? If they have a criminal
record, then sure. Put them in jail if
they're wanted for a crime. But the idea
that they'll just know that, by the way
so, you know, this is the way they
apply with immigration. Somehow, this broad thing, they
just psychically know who is and who is
not a criminal. They don't. They go after
people that are brown. And they're it's coming
out left and right right now. We'll talk
about that in the future.
And it says, we're going to put you
in jail where you belong. It's all going
to happen very fast just like the border.
Exactly. We went from millions pouring in to
zero, which is not true, in the last
few months. This this will be easier. Be
prepared. There will be mister there will be
no mister nice guy. Is that what there
was there before? We went back. We won
our capital back.
I mean, anyway, there's so many points to
make about how weird this is and won
our capital. But it says, thank you for
your attention on this matter. Now this person
says, and I'm not familiar with,
by the time people see this, this is
this see what this really is, it'll be
too late. So this is opinion.
It says, so the homeless are going to
consen to a concentration camp, a k k
a institution,
in accordance with a recent Trump executive order,
which, again, I hate the idea that any
of these things actually continue off of him
signing a piece of paper sent by himself.
You know, this is not the way the
country is supposed to work regardless of the
narrative. And now it says the military will
be used just like the border and be
ready for concussion grenades and
I mean, how is that not how this
will ultimately go? They're not gonna want to
leave, especially if they're gonna go to jail.
So this can this
imagine no matter how you agree with this
and whether you think this book should happen,
I'm not even getting into my opinion on
it. The point is that
don't
don't look at the the subject. Look at
the the precedent. Look at the outcome. Right?
What will this allow them to do next
time? Maybe with a protest that's in their
way, and they suddenly rationalize for the same
thing. Like, you have to ask about the
legalities always. And right now, they're rampantly lawless.
Really, I just a continued growth of that
direction from previous administrations, but it's pretty wild
right now.
Now two last points before we get into
some quick, hopefully, quick points on Israel to
then focus on the main part for today.
This
is what he said recently
about,
or rather, JD Vance was when he was
tossed to about the meeting,
regarding
them game planning the Epstein conversation.
And remember, they laughed it off like you're
a bunch of stupid conspiracy theorists. Here's it.
The mass hosting a gathering this evening to
talk about how to respond to the Epstein
situation?
Is he working on what? Is he hosting
some kind of gathering of top advisers this
evening
to talk about how to respond to the
Epstein situation? I don't know. I could ask
you that question.
I don't know of it, but I think
Remember when I pointed out they were laughing
before I mean, so what were they laughing
at right there? Clearly, well, this is not
an opinion, guys. That shows you they were
discussing something about this before.
Otherwise, what was funny about that? Right? It
would there's so that showed me, and this
is my opinion, that they were they were
praying for that. Like, they they were ready
to discount that because that's what the news
said. And it's always good to make the
news look bad. Remember how long ago we
were talking about that, about wondering if they
were,
especially Trump's last administration, right, where they would
say something intentionally wrong to get the media
to jump at it and then do something
different. Now this is slightly different. Or when
the media gets wind of something they don't
want you to see, they just change it
and pretend like they were never gonna do
it and go, oh, you're so fake news,
which they are, by the way. But this
is one of those examples.
I I here's the man right here. I
saw it reported today,
and it's completely fake news. We're not meeting
to talk about the Epstein situation.
And I think the reporter who reported it
needs to get better sources.
And then they met and talked about the
Epstein situation,
which is the truth.
So here and and here here's the interesting
breakdown.
If I can find my window. There we
go. Okay.
So JD Vance participated in a high level
meeting at the White House to discuss how
to address the Epstein scandal after previously denying
the meeting would occur. After the meeting was
leaked, the meeting was moved to Vance's residence
in the White House. Now the reason I
find that interesting to report is because some
when somebody tagged me and this is why
I saw it,
literally, not because I was psychic, but just
because I thought this is how silly they
are. And that's actually what I said. That
they're so binary. They're so basic in the
way that they do these things. That's the
the way they go. They're the junior team.
I've been saying that for a while. Is
I said literally exactly what I said was
the most likely to be the outcome. Not
like this is even that hard to predict
anymore as the US government is so very
inept and transparent.
So they switch the meeting and go fake
news because it's not there anymore. You know?
That's laugh worthy. That's insanely small. You know
what I mean? Like, that's it's just but
that's who these people are.
Now I'm you know, I'm just for I'm
gonna jump ahead really quick to the last
thing I was gonna show you today at
the end of the show because it feels
relevant, and we'll come back to it at
the end. David Icke says the dumbest of
dumb governments in The UK, the dumbest of
dumb governments in The US, the dumbest of
dumb governments wherever you look, which I agree
with, which is the right to pause in
the point. Makes you wonder who's actually are
they in charge? I find that hard to
believe. If they were that stupid and inept
and clumsy, somebody would do something. Well, okay.
And he goes on, coincidence? Not a chance.
Dumb people do as their shadow masters tell
them. They are too dumb to do anything
else. Now you could change dumb out with
greedy, you know, profiteering
or or the idea that the shadow masters,
you could say lobby or, you know, whatever
it is. The point is there's something clearly
going on, and I think we're starting to,
as a society, as a world, to start
seeing this. Something else is dictated. This has
been an old conversation. David Icke has been
calling this out for years. Now you may
even disagree, which in some cases I do,
about what he thinks is the general point,
the larger point. But at the end of
the day,
we are watching a shocking reality of people
that are, I mean, too stupid. I mean,
I I shouldn't go bottom line is it's
clear that they are not good at this
right now and are getting caught left and
right. And it makes you wonder if even
that's the point. But overall, I think somebody
else is truly calling the shots.
So
they lied, got caught. I thought that was
interesting, and it shows you what really is
happening here in regard to, one, them trying
to
game plan, which is what it was, the
Epstein conversation. So let's try and jam being
honest about it and game planning the outcome
into the same conversation. Good luck with that.
They're lying to you. Now let's talk about
some Israel points. Again, I I in a
show where I've got more time, I'm gonna
go through this again because even though you
know we've been covering this the entire time
and long before October 7 with a fine
tooth comb showing you exactly what's happening.
Glenn Greenwald, to start off, says a Jewish
professor
of this is a quick point on censorship
and and and where the Trump administration and
just the US government is leaning. A Jewish
professor of holocaust studies, a Jewish professor who
taught holocaust studies may now leave Columbia University
because the texts the text
and text, like, on on, like, her school,
material that she gave students
that she's always used well before this point
in time includes the Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt.
How do you say that? Arendt,
a Jewish
philosopher, who compared Zionists to Nazis, rightly so,
if you understand even the most basic of
things about Zionism trying to work alongside Nazis,
basic and provable fact. You look it up
on Wikipedia, guys, and it says, and said
Zionism is racist. Because it is. It is
literally as even,
Abhislam, a very highly
regarded Israeli
professor, will tell you, it is racism. Zionism
is racism. It's the worst kind of racism.
It's apartheid.
And has
now banned these ideas under the IHRA
hate speech code as Trump has forced on
universities. So let's take a step back and
recognize that what they're doing is not about
Jewish anything. It's about Zionism. And in fact,
it's now censoring Jewish people who simply have
an opinion about and really, not an opinion,
have facts to show you about what Zionists
don't want you to see.
It just can't get any more ridiculous, guys.
And this is what they're doing to you.
They're censoring Americans based on what Zionists want
in a foreign country
and, sadly, currently in your government.
This is important to understand
because these are lies, guys, in regard to
what they're trying to to what they're rather
they're trying to censor the truth. Let's put
it that way to make it more clear.
And the idea here about Zionists and Nazis,
we've gone over this a million times. In
fact, here I'll grab this one.
An important one, actually.
Damn it. I was gonna help him grab
that article that I was saying earlier.
There it is. I'll put that down there
at the end for later. But so here,
Zionism versus Nazism. Israel's connection to extremist ideology
and Adios' history of faking Nazi marches. Now
we've also interviewed people like Dan Cohen, a
Jewish person himself, who breaks down the exact
same argument. In fact, Dan's the one that
showed me how Zionism tried to align itself
with Nazi Germany as well as Stalin because
they wanted a fascist entity to maintain their
their control. And they weren't. They didn't wanna
work with the Jews in Europe. They did.
I mean, it's just I don't wanna dive.
I can go and do it forever like
we've done in the past. It's so obvious
that we're being deceived.
So now you're even watching Jewish
professors of holocaust studies being censored by Zionism
because it's totally about Jewish history. Right? Now
Israel is currently holding, not for the first
time, a US citizen. But you're not gonna
hear your US government care about that because
it's not a Israeli US citizen. That's my
opinion.
But look at this. Another a father of
a 16 year old American teenager who is
being illegally held in Israeli prison right now.
We've seen veterans held from they were on
a flotilla. We've seen plenty of these. They
don't care, guys. Americans killed in Gaza never
got a peep on the corporate media.
Half ask yourself why that is.
Netanyahu
claims that many leaders agree with Israel and
the world, which clearly they do or they're
forced to, but they can't commit to it
in front of the country's
in front of the country's public opinion.
Oh, so we're all racist, is his point.
Everyone in every country in the world's racist,
and the leaders that they pay are the
ones that are honest.
That makes sense. It says, look. We know
you're right, but we can't stand in front
of the public opinion in our country and
say that's our problem, not your
problem. It's obvious what's happening, and they're desperate.
On top of that,
another person, another this is a a a
Trump's Gaza negotiator
resigns. How many of these do we need
to see truly exposes the Netanyahu
and the US government collapsed the ceasefire,
which time he's referring to? Who knows? They've
done it 50 times. When Hamas was close
to agreeing to the deal. Every time they
do this, and we've proven it to you
every time. Who's and,
Bishra Bhabha, who secured Eden Alexander's release as
Witkoff adopted Israel's line and completely ignored breakthroughs
in the debt talks. Exactly. Every time. In
regard to what's going on with the assassination
food lines happening in Gaza,
this and this was actually reported by The
Intercept, a lead contractor for security at the
Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation, which is Mossad funded as Max Blumenthal
pointed out, which have become mass killing grounds
for starving Palestinians.
Johnny Taz Mulford is a member of a
Florida chapter of what's called the Infidels,
a crusader inspired motorcycle club opposing the radical
jihadist movement,
sort of kinda thing that you see, like,
the tattoos you see on people like Hegseth.
It's the same kind of overlap. That's the
mindset they have. The Intercept reported that Mulford,
a veteran and private military contractor, was recruited
for the job in May. By whom?
Mossad?
He confirmed that he is currently in Israel
but declined to comment.
America first, guys.
Now here is what your current government is
saying in front of the United Nations. So
so or here we're the world sees this.
Everybody everywhere, even major conservative people are starting
to call out the obvious genocide. Even Trump
said they're starving people because he's
recognizing that he's losing by holding that line.
And here's what they're saying in front of
everybody. This is what evil looks like in
my mind. It is unfortunate that members have
again taken advantage of today's meeting to accuse
Israel of genocide.
These accusations are politically motivated and categorically false.
They are part of a deliberate, cynical propaganda
campaign
as Hamas attempts to win symbolic victories to
compensate for total defeat in war.
As if that was even close to happening.
I mean, it's insane. Or the the amount
of casual like, look at the overlap.
Robbers have been breaking this down the entire
time. Like, they've lost.
Now they killed a hell of a lot
of innocent people, so you could call that
a loss in its own right. You should.
But in regard to military
achievement, Israel lost. Like, they've lost every other
time before this against Hamas. Look it up.
That's a fact, guys. And it's just wild
that they can't even be honest about the
basic realities of the military campaign, let alone
the genocide that the whole world can see
and everybody with any standing in anything regarding
genocide. The Limpkin Institute, people I mean, I
could go on forever. Holocaust survivors, every human
rights group, the IPC,
everybody is telling you they're starving people to
death and committing genocide, and here she is.
Imagine how that person like, you think she's
just that stupid, uninformed,
or that she just wants power? Because that's
what I think right now. That's why I
call them the junior team. These are nobody
with any respect like, even if they're bad
people, they're like, no way. I'm not stepping
into that because I know it's it's obvious.
Everyone sees it. I'm not gonna step in
there and be destroyed.
So people like this, who are more interested
in having a small bit of power, are
willing to make themselves look like monsters.
Or she just doesn't see it. My point
though is that I think that's the kind
of person that's pulled into this right now.
The junior team has never had the opportunity.
The United States refutes these allegations
entirely.
Israel has taken numerous measures to limit harm
to civilians and to address
humanitarian
needs. The loss of civilian life in Gaza
is tragic,
but the responsibility for this rests with Hamas.
Wow.
Hamas. Because Hamas has killed them all. Right?
I just don't even know how you can
say that with a straight face. Like, even
if you're actually arguing, actually arguing, that the
tens of thousands that you could prove, it's
way more than that, that have been killed,
are all just tied to Hamas' legs.
You realize that still does not change the
legality of what they're doing. It it just
from day one, we've been saying this. And
that's why people like Francesca Albanese have been
saying it also, and that's why they're attacking
her for it.
Oops. I was looking at the at that
open still. Alright. So next point on this,
just to continue on, just points I don't
want you to miss, guys. Syria hasn't stopped.
This honestly, out of everything, even over the
ongoing genocide, and especially not that I say
everyone sees that part of it. I can't
believe that people aren't talking about Syria.
It's I mean, it's
I'm trying to think of an example. It's
so obvious.
Because, obviously, Jelani is a terrorist, Al Qaeda,
that they had on a bounty for his
head. They told you he was a terrorist,
and then they just put him in the
suit, take him and then publicly take him
off the list because he's there.
And then they went on to execute everybody
they could find. Israel's there doing the same
thing, building bases, bombing innocent people. They're raping,
murdering, and torturing. They're committing ethnic cleansing. Ev
we've shown you a 100 different examples and
experts on the ground. It's insane to me
that we don't talk about this. Not only
just they're doing it. And what's interesting is
even on top of that, you got Zionists
and people in that field, the mainstream alternative
media, turning around and going, look. That's what
jihadists do. It's going, well, in this case,
you're accurate, but they're the ones hired by
Israel and pushed in their it's it's not
what it appears to be. This is why
we point out the Assad dressing up like
these people or funding and arming and creating
their own versions of it to blame people
like Palestinians,
not to say that there's not people out
there that do it in their own accord.
The point is
that you can't make this out to be
a a representation of anything other than Israeli
and US Government actions and the people they
fund and support and arm. And as always,
they've always funded the worst elements of what
they claim they're fighting. It's as easy it's
the easiest thing to prove in the entire
conversation. So what you're gonna see here quickly
is them executing people, doctors in in in
Syria.
Hor this is CCTV video showing the new,
quote, democratic Syrian regime executing doctors in,
Suwadis City
for being Druze.
Right. Despite all the claims of how they
support the Druze from Israel.
Just to get support in the sea.
I mean, this this is what terrorism looks
like, guys, and this is what they support.
This is what the Israeli US government openly
support.
It makes me sick.
More to come. We'll talk about it.
Tammy Bruce,
just a long line and a bunch of
monster liars,
best known for defending the so called Gaza
Humanitarian Foundation. As she literally said, the GHF
has been a great success.
Imagine saying that. You could argue they're not
kill that that that it's only Hamas. Right?
But to say it's been a success, it
just shows you how absolutely captured they are.
That's
crazy. No what success at what measure? Maybe
success at killing Palestinians.
They haven't successfully relayed that much food at
all, if any. I mean, the re it
just blows my mind.
And reading its statements verbatim is what she
was doing amid daily massacres by Israeli forces,
which even people at the World Food Programme,
people that worked there have told us publicly,
executing them because they're executing them, will no
longer serve as the State Department spokesperson.
Isn't it interesting how many people during Trump's
reign fall and leave and resign?
I mean, it happens almost every administration, but
just like the last time, it's almost unprecedented,
if not unprecedented,
with Trump in power. I don't know what
that shows you, but it's interesting to watch
how many people will break away and act
like it's no big deal. So she's leaving,
but she's going to the UN. So, technically,
it's a little different than the ones that
just leave entirely.
But I think it's because
nobody wants to be in that horrible position
because your job is to look stupid and
lie, which when everyone knows you're lying. That's
what seems to be their job today. And
she's now Trump has now named her US
deputy representative of the United Nations. Oh, great.
So she can represent
more Zionist interest in the United Nations.
Mohammed Safa points out a crane that has
been stalled by Israel
in the aid distribution sites.
Apparently, this crane is the technocratic future of
The United States.
It's killed 1,500 plus people so far simply
waiting for aid, injured ten thousand more. One
of the characteristics of the crane is that
it's controlled automatically.
Without human intervention, detecting
danger, who knows how based on probably Palantir
AI with
the lavender and Hobbesaur, but that's what they're
doing,
on its own and firing on its own.
A 25 millimeter
machine gun is mounted on it capable of
exploding a person's head. The machine gun is
mounted on a crane and is an automatic
machine gun, meaning it doesn't fire a single
shot, but rather a large volley of bullets.
Assuming you need one shot to hit one
person, the other shots will hit others behind
him. That's why this crane claims the lives
of thousands of people. And they shoot these.
And, again, 2022, Israel testing AI controlled machine
gun systems in Hebron, West Bank. This is
not new, and this is just the extension.
This is where it goes. Simple point, guys,
and we will go over this more in
the future, is this is just automatically firing
on a bunch of innocent people as we've
heard from the Green Beret. We've heard from
the world World Food Programme.
Genocide.
And this video, I think, is an important
way to connect all of it. And then
we're gonna get into the rest of the
show in regard to self spreading, self amplifying
RNA in the future therein. But Carrie says,
America be afraid. This isn't stopping at Gaza.
The most chilling thing I've seen responding to
these immigration raids. I'm an immigrant rights attorney,
and usually, I'm a pretty optimistic guy. I
don't get scared easily. I love watching horror
movies. Over the past six months, I've seen
some really disturbing stuff. At one location, people
hid when I showed up, and ICE still
found them using a thermal drone that detects
body heat. Where was this technology first tested?
By Israel in occupying Palestine.
When people get taken by ICE, they often
refuse to say their names. So ICE identifies
them using a facial recognition
technology.
Where was this tech first used? By Israel
in occupied Palestine. Surprise. Right. People refuse to
let ICE search their phones.
ICE will plug their phones into this box,
and it unlocks their phone. Where was this
tech first used? By Israel in occupied Palestine.
Guys, that's amazing. Of dystopian
tech that the US government has taken from
Israel to use in its own country is
terrifying, and this is why freeing Palestine and
abolishing ICE goes hand in hand.
I I thought I had I guess I
don't have it anymore.
I've got a video
or how I played a video, but it
you guys know this, but it's I was
hoping I had it offhand of what where
you have Israelis at these international
weapon sales, which is just weapons trafficking, but
it's okay because they sell to governments though
who kill former people than anybody in the
world. But that's the good stuff. The point
is
they call it battle tested.
Things they use on Palestinians,
from little cans that explode in children's hands
to massive weapons they don't want you to
know about, they test them on Palestinians, and
then they sell them as battle tested. Not
a joke. And so his point, guys, is
that that is what all this comes from.
We have ICE right now, which I was
gonna include, but I'm glad I didn't. I
wanna make sure I have enough time.
Ultimately,
ICE
is
you know, this is the gestapo at this
point, guys. And I know it's it's such
a buzz thing for people right now. It
is the most obvious overlap.
What they're doing is unconstitutional.
It's illegal. They're not there's no warrant. Their
faces are covered. They're not identifying themselves, and
they're going after US citizens. I've already shown
you, I mean, an endless amount of examples
of US citizen getting arrested, and we have
children that have been deported.
It's just on top of it, they keep
telling you that they're gonna be focusing on
Americans. But all that they're using, whether it's
immigrants or not, that's my point of the
other point we just made. It's going to
expand. These are pointed inward. Is are there
there are tools ICE is using in The
United States, in many cases against Americans, whether
or not they arrest them, that were developed
against Palestinians in Gaza, that were paid for
by your tax dollars, probably entirely, that are
now being used against you in this dystopian,
technocratic future they're building. I mean, it's everything
we're talking about. I I mean, and think
about this. Palantir said the same thing. I
mean, how do you think they're scanning
the only way they can effectively do what
they claim they're doing is to look at
everybody.
It's not hard to recognize. And now that's
where you live.
I mean, it couldn't be more clear. Now
we're gonna come back on that more as
we go forward. But I wanna make sure
we get to this today because this is
rather, I'm going to. This is the main
thing I wanna make sure we discuss.
And we just talked about this as well
on the eighth when this when this came
out.
Trump admin's mRNA sleight of hand,
the long planned universal vaccine.
It has. When we play the clip of
Fauci, you know, we've we've seen Rick Bright
do the same. We've seen it is clear
that this has been a long term plan
that they're excited about. And now the RFK
Jr team is rolling it out.
And that's where it gets more interesting about
what that overlaps with. But first, I wanna
make sure you if you didn't see yesterday's
show, just give you the quick understanding of
what we're talking about here. Now the main
point
well, I mean, I guess the first the
first thing to highlight is they came out
and said, canceling $500,000,000,000
in mRNA contracts.
Well, they didn't really do that.
What they came out and did
is say they're gonna cancel well, I shouldn't
say it like that. They I mean, well,
tell the point I I've yet to see
all 22 they claimed they canceled.
So until I see that and so I
see what they you know, what's actually being
canceled, then I I as always, we should
wait to see it. But they claimed and
I and I do feel like that in
some way was happening, but we shouldn't assume
that either. The point is they put that
forward,
and then
on the document they shared,
it says, HHS winds down mRNA vaccine development
under BARDA.
And, by the way, under BARDA. Not every
single thing they do is under BARDA.
While some final stage contracts,
or so again, this is what they said.
We're we're winding down MRA. Now most everybody
who reported this,
they quoted this first sentence. They they weirdly
left out this part. I'll tell you why.
And then left out this bottom line. And,
sadly, so many title skimmers out there, even
people who are honest, didn't know about this.
It says, well, some final stage contracts,
Arcturus and Amplitude, I did get it right,
will be allowed to run their course because
money's invested.
Well, okay. Then why did you cancel the
Moderna shot that had been started well before
in Biden's administration?
Same argument. Right?
I it it does there's no logic there.
Okay. But regardless, I don't think it's about
that. I think that's the narrative they're using
to make you go well, because the people
that support them will go, you can't just
waste the money even though they would if
it was the other side. Right? As always.
The point is both Arcturus and Amplitude are
working on self amplifying shots that include mRNA.
And that that's the first indication I got.
It's okay. Then it's weird that they would
go, we're ending all these, but we're focusing
on the ones that I always kinda thought
was where it was gonna go.
So it seems obvious. Then it says down
here,
you other uses of the mRNA technology within
the department are not impacted by this announcement.
That includes
food. But plenty of other things we probably
don't even know about. So mRNA is not
even m let me put it this way.
MRNA technology,
not even close to going away. What they
did is cancel specific mRNA contracts while not
even stopping mRNA
shots in many cases,
And then also continuing the technology direction, which,
by the way, you know their game with
language. Suddenly, they make a new gene therapy
mRNA, and they go, that's not a shot
anymore. Now it's gene therapy when it's the
exact same thing. You know? My point is
there's ways they go around it when you
can see right in the way they wrote
this that it's not being presented properly. Also
point out
the 22 projects they claimed they're canceling
worth $500,000,000.
Okay. So that will be relevant in a
second. So that's the first part. Clearly, that's
being misrepresented.
Now, here are the projects that I'm mentioning
for Mark Torres.
The h five n one
self amplifying shot, that's what this is, right
here, self amplifying mRNA,
and then SAM RNA.
Not always with the dash right there, but
same point when it's either just sam or
s a dash m RNA.
The point is that's one of the ones
that are around bird flu, which is now
what their
universal platform is supposed to work for flu,
bird flu, COVID, all of it. So they
are still making COVID shots Even in
that, this one I mean, technically, that would
be in a confusing way to say it,
but the one they're making would include COVID
within the shot they're making. But still, again,
continuing these other m COVID shots, mRNA included.
This is the one from 09/30/2024,
self amplifying mRNA COVID shot, Arcturus. So that
one is continuing.
So not only just self amplifying, not only
just mRNA, but COVID nineteen shot into or
in included. That seems like a complete
a lie.
Like, a very
poorly crafted
small deception that we could I mean, that
anybody that looked would have seen right through.
Weird.
Now
this got deleted.
Or, what something they put out about this
I'm sure it's my it's all in my
head. I'm sorry. I'm, like, trying to do
it quickly for those that if you saw
the last show, you know where this goes.
They came out with this tweet.
Maha action.
It says, Arif, good afternoon. We're developing a
universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine
that addresses the entire phallus phallum phylum of
viruses. It's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity,
and it is effective against any kind of
mutation.
We believe it's gonna be effective. Now they
deleted this tweet. I didn't know that till
today. I was on, What is Truth podcast.
It might be out already. I'm not sure.
I think it was live. Good guy. Enjoyed
talking to him.
He brought this up. I hadn't seen it
yet. And we watched it on the show,
and I'm and so they deleted this, which
I find really interesting, which we'll play for
you. But Luther simply says, why did Kennedy
delete his tweet about developing a universal vaccine?
Grock, his screenshot, like, is I can't verify
that Grock said that, but he they it
was deleted from that account.
True Street Media, we showed you this in
the last show. They had captioned it. Right?
And there's the link if you wanna try
to find it. I wasn't able to find
it anywhere, like, on the way back machine,
but I do have the the clip simply
showing you. It says Garf Arkey junior told
everyone straight up what his job at HHS
secretary is, to restore trust in the vaccine
program. That's where he is.
So we're gonna play this real quick just
so you can see it again because just
it was deleted. But then we're gonna talk
about the overlap of this new universal platform
and what it is, which we showed you
in on the eighth. Right? Joe,
Joe,
Josh Walcos
did did kind of a deep dive on
this in particular, which you'll find very interesting
where the funding comes from and some stuff
that I had planned to go deeper into,
which is the actual documentation of it, which
I I haven't seen really anybody do yet.
We'll go into that. But the point before
you miss it, before we go beyond it,
is simply that
we were deceived about what this was.
And I think it's very clear now, as
we'll go into more in this next part
of the segment, that the self amplifying direction
is clearly what they're pivoting into
and others that I'm worried about.
But
where were we?
Here, we'll play the clip, and then we'll
go through the platform.
Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH,
which is a vaccine that addresses the entire
phylum of viruses.
Phylum. So it's a it's a vaccine that
mimics natural immunity,
and it But wait. I thought natural immunity
was a conspiracy. No. Obviously, he knows that
he's he's been one of the few that
have always told you natural immunity is important.
Interesting, though. Right? For many even people sitting
around him, people at the NIH who have
told you before that natural immunity is you
know, it's just weird how these things pivot
around, isn't it?
And it it is effective against any kind
of mutations. So it doesn't drive the virus
to mutate,
and it could be effective. We believe it's
gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses,
but also flu.
And it's gonna be a much more much
safer
and much more effective vaccine.
Okay.
Why would you delete that?
Genuinely, I mean, that that seems like I
mean, other than the fact that it was
unpopular, which shows you that they're really clearly
trying to cultivate
how everything looks, which doesn't seem honest at
all to me.
Now
HHS, NIH launched next generation
universal vaccine platform. This was the May 1
one I showed you a while back. Remember,
we showed you this
in May. I think May 4, we showed
you this. Way back before this was a
big topic. Yet again, you would have known
about this well before the social media conversation
if you watched this platform. And there's plenty
of other independent media I argue were doing
the same thing.
Now it says the initiative represents a decisive
shift toward transparency, effectiveness,
clearly, and comprehensive preparedness.
Is that you know, preparedness is always one
of those words. Funding the NIH in house
development of universal
influenza
and coronavirus vaccines. Now to be clear, this
hasn't happened yet. Now they have these two
they're working on, both of which are something,
but the point is that that the way
that lists almost sounds like they may end
up just making universal COVID shots and universal
flu shots, which is one of the variations
of what they're discussing. But they include candidates,
as we told you on the on the
eighth, BPL
one three five seven and BPL
twenty four nine one zero. So that is
important to understand because of what these things
are as we'll go into next. Before we
get to that, oh, this was the one
that Josh Walkel shared just to show you
on the n I NIH as well. It's
called the beta
propylactone
inactivated
whole virus platform,
which we went over. Right? They argue they
have a lot more side effects. I still
argue that even the whole virus old version
of these are less than we've seen from
mRNA.
But, also, it's the ones that their people
have argued and that they call it a
conspiracy theory about whether you can get sick
from them. They say it's inact inactivated, but
there's clear evidence that's not whether they fail
at that part of it or whether it's
not that it doesn't work. So interesting to
see we're going back to this.
But my mind on this real again, not
forgetting that they're not stopping mRNA,
this whole thing may be a head fake.
But if it's not,
it's interesting that we're seeing this new direction
in in regard to using the old technology,
which
maybe this whole thing is about an you
know, a look at it like this. This
in and of itself is still an experimental
step.
I don't know why we're okay with that
with what we just went through, But it
gets it gets more interesting than this. Now
before we go to Josh Walco's post,
this is what I wanted to read from
you from the May 13 post about this,
which sets a couple of important points you
might have not seen. Trump administration's universal flu
vaccine project puzzled scientists. You see, it was
very public. Just weirdly doesn't get a lot
of attention
in certain fields.
People against other respiratory viruses that could cause
a pandemic, such as bird flu, coronaviruses,
you know, just showing that they're making the
they're doing this toward stopping these things, which
peep a lot of people don't even feel
you know, there's a lot of varying opinions
in the in the partisan side that don't
that very statement alone would cause them a
problem. That's that's why I'm always trying to
point that out. But it says, quote, I'm
glad to see that this administration is still
wanting to invest in developing next generation
influenza vaccines or respiratory vaccines in general. And
that's not what a lot of Maha people
would have wanted.
First of all, it says the project plans
to use an approach that would involve injecting
people with a whole flu virus that's been
killed with a chemical to render it harmless,
which there's a whole
if this fully becomes real and is being
given out, there's we'll probably go over that
point also about that process and what there's
also points to be made about that. But
it says, but it's still capable of stimulating
the immune system. Most vaccine experts consider the
whole virus approach to be antiquated.
Now it says, and there then there's the
price tag,
$500,000,000.
Right. So they stopped funding for $500,000,000
for 22 different random projects and then just
pivoted that 500,000,000
right back into COVID nineteen flu shots or
universal for both. So let's recognize, one, they
didn't stop spending anywhere, and that's the case
of a larger point too that they're not.
They're spending way more than they I mean,
even previous administrations. But on top of that,
it just seems they just reorganized,
and and they're still making both mRNA from
before, mRNA projects, and still then putting that
money back into things that are experimental and
COVID nineteen flu related. This feels like sort
of a manipulation, doesn't it?
Now other aspects that that are, oh, wait.
It goes on to say,
especially at a time when the health research
funding has been slashed, the money was originally
earmarked. Yeah. So that very money was earmarked
for COVID nineteen next generation shots. So they're
doing what that what was supposed to be
done with it. Another aspect that's raising eyebrows
is the fact that the technology called a
beta propylactone
inactivated whole virus platform was developed, and this
is important to me, by two NIH scientists,
doctor Matthew Momoli and doctor Jeffrey Todd,
Taubenberger.
Now this is the same thing we talked
about last time with the patents, which we
went over in the last show.
That was a big deal with with Fauci
and people he worked with having financial investments
and, you know, that's the same difference here.
And and not only that,
Taubenberger was recently named acting director of of
n I of NIAID.
And Taubenberger holds a patent on the technology
just like before. In addition, the strategy was
picked without independent public review and based on
very limited preliminary testing.
Doesn't feel I mean, how in the world
does that feel better than everything else we've
gone through? It feels like the same old
thing the in almost every single way. And,
you know, people that have are people that
have already worked under Fauci. I don't know
why that doesn't alarm the very people that
are most on guard about this conversation. And
it says the BPL platform is fully government
owned and NIH developed.
Doesn't make me feel any better. This approach
ensures radical transparency. Really? Because they're typically radically
transparent, and they're not doing that now.
No.
That's important to get off to to show
you guys. Now
oh, one more thing is just this I
just saw this when I was going through
other work. Don't forget this.
This is this is from the one of
these major studies we showed you. So there's
still, guys, making things toward COVID nineteen or
the flu, which is I mean, if we're
gonna if we understand now,
oh, of course, they lock this down. Oh,
wait. Okay. Good. I was gonna say, I
thought they had a paywall.
Is that we know the reality of this.
Right? This is they they the far as
I could tell, the last standing, like, this
is the most relevant, the body of evidence.
It's done by the ionitis group.
And the point is,
at a global level, before vaccinations were given,
the infection fatality rate may have been as
low as point o three percent and point
o seven percent for 59
years
old. Well less than the flu. And then,
and
oh, I'm sorry. So point o three percent
for 59
and point o seven for 69.
That's shockingly less than the flu. And the
best part here, the most alarming,
ninety four percent of the entire population of
the world is within that category.
So they lied to you. This thing was
less than the flu from day one. We
know that because Imperial College lied to us,
and we could prove that. They used their
own pay I mean, that's what they're paid
for, in my opinion, or at least specifically,
Neil
what's his name? I'm forgetting his name now.
But in a way, the point,
it was never dangerous, at least not in
the case the way they framed it. As
the flu, it's it's the same thing. We're
always being scared into these things. So realize
this is the science. They're claiming to follow
the science and all or just the body
of evidence of the scientific work shows you
this if you look across all of it,
and they're still telling you you need shots
for it. I think that's worth pointing out.
Now
Josh champagne, Josh here, Josh Walcos came out
with this. This is on the eighth. You
know what new you know that new universal
vaccine RFK Jr. Was just touting? It's called
BPL one three seven one three five seven,
a beta propylactone
inactivated whole virus universal influenza vaccine developed in
house at NIH, NIH eight, but you'll never
guess who's funding its production.
Specifically, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation overlapped
with somebody else. I'll show you that right
now. So here's the document. You can check
it out for yourself. Actually, I should download
this on on the TLab server in case
this disappears.
But here's the point he was showing, by
the way. Thanks. Shout out to Josh Walcos.
Good work.
And this is the the post he was
showing over here.
Here it is. Screenshot it.
Preclinical development at good manufacturing prac and good
manufacturing practice production
of the vaccine
have been facilitated by a gift fund
from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
to NIAID.
Great. So it seems Bill Gates is working
with the people that have patents on this
work, and they're make like, remember when Trump
met Bill Gates and he said they had
a great meeting about the future of vaccines?
Yeah. But people don't wanna talk about that
because Bill Gates will be in prison. Just
wait. Right? Save him for last or whatever
Q is saying. The reality is, guys, that
you're being played. They're working with exactly who
they told you was the biggest enemy. Alright.
And whether it's Gates or whoever you think.
I'm not even suggesting I mean, I I
do very much think that. I mean, we
did a whole thing about the, you know,
the about Bill Gates and and his connection
to all these things. James Corbett did the
same thing. I mean, it's it's, you know,
this fake philanthropy is a very big deal.
But he got, like, overexposed, I think, and
he sort of stepped back, but he's still
involved in all of this. Now re to
be clear, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is
not just Bill Gates or necessarily even involving
him, but it's very clear to me this
is what he's been doing. And Donald Trump
and Bill Gates met about the future of
this, and he said it he basically told
you this is where it was going. So
the reality is on top of everything else,
you now have another thing another thing overlap
with Bill Gates and the Trump administration.
Now it says the b p l one
three five seven contains four different low pathogenicity
avian influenza a viruses.
Each has a different hemaglow
hemo
hemagglutinin
and neuromine
I'm probably mispronouncing that, subtype. The data and
safety monitoring board on the BPL one three
five seven phase one trial is right here.
That's where we got the link from for
you. Now it says, one more thing. The
National Toxicology Program lists BPL
as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.
Nothing new there. Seems like everything they do
is like that. Where was that?
Oh, there it
is. Reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen,
which by the way, in most cases means
it really is and we know it'll probably
hurt you. There's things out there that we
know are shockingly dangerous in that very regard,
and they still go potentially carcinogenic,
you know, because of moneyed interest and so
on. But, you know, maybe not. I question
everything, but my point is that typically when
they when you see it, that it kinda
gets it just gets rested in that place.
And so it's a smaller point in larger
conversation, but this shows you that it's not
something more dangerous in different ways.
It goes on to say, here's a screenshot
of the post that was deleted after backlash
along with the announcement for the universal flu
platform that uses this. There's the post we
showed you. There's the clip he shared. Thank
you for that. And he says, working,
a working link to the aforementioned next generation
vaccine, which we just showed you. So I
think it's really important not only that this
is direct tied to Bill Gates, but the
overarching point in all this is that it's
just a continuation of the same kind of
direction, whether or not mRNA. It's worth wondering
you know, it's worth considering what the real
point of all that was.
You know, it's sort of it's sort of
like the point they make with the partisanship.
You could make it about the fact they
really want you to use proper pronouns, or
you could recognize that that was just a
means to an end for control, for influence,
for censorship, for, I mean, any number of
things.
And that's and and you can see it
doing the same thing from the right if
you're actually paying attention.
Now here, I went through this a little
bit.
Again, you can find this on well, in
the show notes.
Here's the one he showed you. But as
always, what have we looked for in the
past? And this is really preliminary, guys. When
this actually is something that they're selling as
a product, we'll do it again. But here's
what it says. Risks of specifically b p
l one three five seven.
The risks for administration
of b p l one three five seven
are not well known. Fantastic. But again again,
I'm it's that that's something that will probably,
they claim, flush out during the research. But
isn't it funny how that's the same thing
we got when they put out the Pfizer
shots? And it says, as an as an
inactivated
influenza vaccine, the risks are presumably similar to
other inactive.
Oh, good. I'm sure we can assume all
the way to being sold and put your
arm.
But, you know, important to point that out.
As well as the fact that the effectiveness
of BPL one three five seven on pregnant
women or the developing human fetus are unknown.
Going to bet you, it ends up that
way. Now that's not as crazy
historical points, you're not supposed to test on
them
because it's dangerous for them, right?
And so, but my point would be, if
you don't, then you can never market it
to pregnant women. You can't say, Look, we
know it's safe and effective in pregnant women.
Get your flu shot at the same time.
All the stuff they did during during COVID
nineteen lie.
The point is because if you're not gonna
test on them, which they rarely do, then
you damn well better make it clear that
we don't know.
Especially, we almost say you shouldn't take this
because it could be dangerous. It could kill
your baby. We don't know because we didn't
test it on you. We got over this
a million times. Let me see if that
even pops up.
It's been a long time since I've searched
for it.
Oh, maybe it did. Look at that.
This is this is from app for hours
live back then. How can the COVID jab
bivalent and original, be recommended as safe for
pregnant and breastfeeding women when the most current
official documents on the jab shows that they
don't know if it's safe? It's the same
thing.
No data available
on pregnancy. And they not only did they
sell it, they say they told you you
should You should and then get your flu
shot right next to it. Same point there.
The point was that I I don't wanna
grab that one too. That they same thing.
You look it up. They don't know. They
didn't test them alongside of the vaccines.
This happens every time, man. And and you
would hope that RFK would be the different
one, but it doesn't appear so. But let's
wait and see. But, I mean, so far,
we already see that. But the next one
may be different.
Now this is interesting.
Iritatagon,
probably mispronouncing that, however you say that name,
says this is what's really going on.
They ban, in quotes, which I agree with
the framing right now, 22 mRNA jabs. Meanwhile,
400
self amplifying r mRNA jabs are in the
process of being patented under the guise of
treatment for cancer.
Yeah. Like the Stargate platform. Who didn't see
that coming? It's worse than your run of
the mill mRNA. Because my point at the
time was, how in the world are we
gonna think they're gonna pull back a $500,000,000,000
Stargate platform involving Oracle and Larry Ellison and
SoftBank and and OpenAI and all the different
thing and then and then just yank it
back because he decided they don't like it
that day, which I don't even think they
really mean, guys. Clearly, we can see that.
So now it begins it starts to make
more sense. This is my opinion, that it
I I I well, the facts do show
us this is where they're pivoting, but I
don't know about Stargate yet. But how does
that not fill in the blank? I think
that's where this goes, especially with all she's
pointing to, and I'll show you the link.
It's worse than your run of the mill
mRNA. I agree with that. So here's the
our I I looked this up, and I
said, what a weird page.
And it says it just said it's called
the SAM RNA Research Foundation.
Very little information. There's really nothing else to
find on here.
And so I was just I was like,
what is this? Where is this coming from?
And so I I I asked Groc, which
I I very rarely am doing anymore, but
I just had a I was in a
rush and ultimately, I feel like I'd have
more weight for people on this.
And it says,
the SAM RNA Research Foundation, also referred to
the SAM RNA Co Limited,
is a privately owned company focused on developing
self amplifying mRNA technologies.
Now the names don't ring a bell, but
if they do for you, let me know
what you think. Founded by doctor Shi Lung
Lin,
chief scientist consultant, and doctor Jeffrey Hong, business
manager.
Now whether the Chinese names mean something more
to you or not, I mean, like, it
certainly to me just it depends on what's
happening. Right? I I listen. Remember, from the
origin point, this was both China, United States
together, at least in the research that took
place before all of this, whatever you think
actually happened.
Now potential supporters in the field that says,
while not directly linked to the mRNA Research
Foundation, other organizations in the mRNA space such
as Arcturus Therapeutics and Gritstone Bio have received
support
from entities like BARDA, which we were talking
about, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
So there you have it tying back to
arc arc,
Arkturus and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
which is another
swing into all this, which shouldn't surprise you
seeing as how that's the BL plat the
platform we just talked about, the universal platform.
That he is the Bill and Mel Gates
Foundation has put a gave a special fund
to, but the Arcturus was the ones from
before, one from the Biden administration into today,
and one since then from Trump's administration. It
shouldn't be surprising that Bill Gates is connected
to them. Then it goes on to say,
for instance, BARDA awarded Gristone Bio a $433,000,000
contract for a phase two study
of a SAM RNA vaccine, And the Gates
Foundation has backed Arcturus Therapeutics for h five
n one SAM RNA, which again points that
out. So Bill Gates backing one of the
ones, RFK Junior and Trump, are still continuing.
On top of that, BARDA is awarded
almost $500,000,000
to for a study on another SAM RS
self amplifying shot.
I it's I look. I think it's becoming
very clear that this is the direction they're
going in, which is exactly what I was
expecting, but we'll wait to see what happens
tomorrow.
Now doctor McCullough,
on the note of that,
this was back from, May 31.
New study.
COVID nineteen replicon
SAM RNA injections induced,
surprise, surprise,
severe blood abnormalities in ninety three percent of
trial participants. So look. This is specific in
this one, the COVID nineteen replicon SAM RNA
injections.
The point though, guys, is he's talked about
this, I've talked about this, where this is
going, and what they're now currently pushing forward
as the focal point
is just as bad, if not shockingly worse.
You know, think of it like, CBDCs are
bad, but don't worry. We've got the stablecoin
version. And finding out that's way worse.
It's It's what they're doing everywhere. Steve calls
them the bait and switch administration.
He says, this may be the most acutely
toxic COVID nineteen vaccine thus far. Lipid it's
LNP,
NCOVS,
SARNA
o two vaccine, self amplifying. It's just they're
trying this everywhere.
This is the direction, and now they're all
rushing to get there. Recognize. And, oh, look.
He's talking about the self amplifying our mRNA
injection trial in Uganda.
Ninety three percent had severe blood. That's what
he's pointing to. Eighty five percent experienced systemic
symptoms, fever, vomiting. Eighty five percent. They love
to pass that off as normal, hardly. Thrombocytopenia,
same things.
Merc the McCullough Foundation put this out. Self
amplifying
mRNA,
that's what the replicon is implying. Oh, Oh,
you know what? And I should I see.
Again, these are things that I've talked about
so many times.
The simple way to look at this and,
again, I'm not a expert, but I'm pretty
well versed on this stuff. I've interviewed McCullough
many, many, many times. I've I've, you know,
I've been doing this work around this topic
before COVID nineteen, but much during that time
frame. Self amplifying,
you could you you could think about it
like see, this is my point about
the co the Pfizer shot and and having
the original one listed as self amplifying.
And say and they and what they tell
you, no. No. No. It gives you one
spike protein.
And then it goes in the muscle one
time and it's over. Right? Well, what do
we find out? Nope. Not even close. It
continues to make spike protein going on
seemingly indefinitely. We just covered that recently. We
have studies all over the place where it
says I mean, I I could bring up
the Red Cross point again. I love bringing
that up just really quickly for you to
because I the studies are attack attached to
that.
Because I I called the Red Cross out,
if you haven't seen that, where they literally,
back in 2022, said we don't label blood
as vaxxed versus unvaxxed because it doesn't enter
the bloodstream from the COVID shot. And I
just said, here's yet another peer reviewed study
that finds that you're wrong. SARS CoV-two spike
protein
vaccine sequences,
spike mRNA vaccine sequences, circulate the blood up
to twenty eight days after. And then here's
another one, same thing. And another one, same
thing. And the point is we can see
today that some people are still producing spike
proteins. You know why? Because that's what a
self amplifying shot looks like, at least in
part. And so, these are what we're dealing
with. Something that continues to pump these things
out as if that's somehow what we want.
Now, the argument is if you're making a
universal shot, right, it can keep pumping out
the thing that applies to everything all the
time and you'll never get sick again for
the rest of your life. Sure.
Color me skeptical.
US FDA Fast Track Gates BARDA self
funded, self amplifying bird flu shot, Arcturus. That's
what we just talked about. Here's another Arcturus.
Look at that. Here's another Arcturus. Look at
that. Here's another Arcturus. Look at that. Here's,
this is a different one. So look at
this. Four out of the five self amplifying
shots that
doctor McCullough or the Peter McCullough Foundation is
pointing to as coming
or self amplifying made by Arturus.
Don't we go back to the point of
what they're telling you and they say,
don't worry. We're winding them all down except
for some final stage that will continue to
run their course. Now Arcturus is not the
name of a shot, guys. It's the name
of a a company making shots, and that's
the point.
They're still making these, and they're leaning in
heavily to self amplifying shots. That's where this
is going. It says there are currently at
least 33
Replicon mRNA injection candidates in development. It's becoming
abundantly clear that the pharmaceutical industry and CAPTURE
regulatory agencies have zero regard for the massive
safety concerns of undefined synthetic mRNA
replication
resulting in uncontrolled toxic antigen production. It's exactly
what we've been talking about the entire time.
On top of that,
let's not forget,
peer reviewed science finds mod RNA injections cause
cancer. Oh, this is the wrong one, actually.
Here.
I
was doing it quickly earlier.
This one.
This one?
Well, I'll include this one too. Now the
point was we made a very clear point
about the the modified
RNA. That's the whole point. Right? They tried
to tell you it was mRNA. It wasn't.
And one methylpseudouridine
modified
RNA, which is one of the major reasons
it was really hurting people. And so my
point is they're just continuing down that path.
And so it's the modified, the manipulation, the
genetic editing, the the the process. And so
all they're really doing is just trying to
continue, like, to edit to modify this in
a point to where it's hurting you in
the same way. They're not really shifting that,
maybe in slight differentiations of the modification,
but then key and making it to where
it will produce even more. Here's a clip
that that
McCullough Foundation included. I have major concerns particularly
about these new self amplifying
replicon
injections
in which that was just approved for adults
18 years and older in the European Union
as well as in Japan a few years
ago,
and now they're trialing them here in America,
by Arcturus
Therapeutics
funded by the Gates Foundation
as well
as BARDA.
And so they're they're developing these, and the
problem with self amplifying
mRNA
is it basically acts like a virus in
your body. It gets in there, it starts
to self replicate, and you're gonna have massive
antigen production, toxic antigen production.
Who knows how long it's gonna replicate for?
Who knows if it's gonna shed?
And it's just an absolute disaster, and it
risks
a permanent damage to populations. They have to
be stopped.
I agree.
So now is the time to play this
clip again that we started with, but recognize
that that's where the overlap comes in, guys.
That's what this has always been, and this
has been one more effort to jam this
into your life. It doesn't seem to be
going away. It just gets stronger regardless of
the administration.
Vid nine
Since the outbreak of COVID nineteen, the word
virus has been dominating
media headlines as well as our daily lives.
Did you know that one approach that has
been proposed to control virally transmitted diseases is
by releasing a virally transmitted vaccine?
Unlike traditional vaccines,
infectious vaccines do not require any individual consent.
For the podcast, it's showing a woman on
a couch
touching a a child,
a pregnant woman, and then these little virus
things look just like the COVID virus or
else or whatever you wanna think that is,
are all floating around and going into their
bodies. And then from the pregnant woman to
another child.
No informed consent.
Almost kinda sounds like they're happy about that.
Infectious solutions are also being developed for food
and agriculture
and are currently making their way through the
regulatory approval process. Many of which are literally
in your lives right now, guys.
However, do we really want to intentionally
disperse these modified viruses outside the lab? Too
late. Is this the forward march of science
or a mistake?
Join our live event at the twenty twenty
EuroScience Open Forum.
'20 '20, September.
Involved a hell of a lot of pea
the point is, guys, this was where it
was going. Sort of feels like an event
to a one e kinda thing.
The point is it's always been the aim.
They very clearly are going this direction.
So
this is the article, one of them anyway,
from the Free Thought Project. Scientists accuse DARPA
of genetically modifying insects for bioweapon
to spread agricultural viruses.
K. That is literally what this is. Here's
just one of the articles that covers the
same thing. Scathing report accuses the Pentagon of
developing an agricultural bioweapon. Now they push back
they they they pull back on this.
There was scientists
right there. Insect allies. I gotta save this
one for future just so I can bring
up the,
here's DARPA. Insect Allies.
They claim this is about helping crops.
Scientists around the world signed a thing that
said, stop this. It's a dual weapon, a
dual use weapon,
and they pulled back.
The reality though is that they didn't stop.
Obviously, you see that. And so when now
this is just coming at you from a
different angle. It's all that really comes down
to. Now the food aspect is still part
of this as well. If we're really thinking
about the multifaceted effort, then something think about
the idea that and it's everywhere, in my
opinion, the the many different ways. And it's
not just about getting this in your body.
There's some there's more going on around that.
But one of the worries, at the very
least, is that that's the objective. And so
if that is the case, if you think
that's the focus, recognize this stuff is actually
happening.
Sherry Tenpenny says they're moving the vaccine agenda
from the clinic to the farm. RNA vaccines,
in quotes, are now being sprayed onto crops,
reprogramming plants in real time. No labels, no
long term safety, no consent. It's and that's
what we're just showing you. And once it's
in the food chain, there's no taking it
back, which is sadly kinda where I think
it already is. But here's her post
for, her Substack, which you should follow.
Oh, no. Oh, damn it. Oh, good. See?
And that's why I take screenshots.
I was just gonna like it. I hit
the wrong one. So it's called it's called
doctor Tenpenny, eye on the evidence, RNA vaccines
in your food. The next phase of the
global genetic experiment, August 9.
So she writes, the government,
excuse me, has already given permission to spray
a new synthetic RNA pesticide directly onto crops.
This isn't science fiction. It's already been used
for experimental use. This is not new at
all. This actually this is the post. EPA
registers novel pesticide technology for potato crops, 12/22/2023.
Still being used today.
It says,
the EPA approved
the first RNA based spray on application,
Greenlight spray called Ledprona
in 2023.
Ledprona is a sprayable,
double stranded
d sRNA
product that targets the Colorado potato beetle.
According to the EPA, or at least that's
the framing of what you know, this is
the justification for the experiment.
According to the EPA, Ledeprona is a new
type of pesticide that relies on an inborn
mechanism
used by plants and animals to protect against
disease called RNA
in or rather, RNA interference. We talked about
this too, RNAi.
Now it says in May 2023, the EPA
approved an experimental use permit under the federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. How many times
we talked about that? To test it on
318
acres across 10 different states.
Great. So you were part of the experiment
whether you knew it or not. The trial
evaluated the new insecticide's ability to kill the
beetle, which is known to rapidly develop resistance
to chemical based insecticides.
So on a quick side note, let's remember
we've talked about this plenty.
There's a one of the many shows which
you'll probably enjoy watching if you want to
hear more about that and the overlapping problems
and the lie around a lot of it.
Obligatory pesticide spraying in New York City, g
m mosquitoes, and flying vaccinators. Are they all
connected? All of which are very provable and
real. On top of that, this is one
of the posts that I've shared on from
that show, but also just talking about this,
about how what they did in their practice
allowed 15%,
give or take, of these mosquitoes to bypass
what they did, which then gave them the
mutation to
be resistant to it. Then they bred, and
it continued. And then now now we're at
a point where this isn't working anymore. And
they've just created a army of massive resistant
GM mosquitoes, and it's the same kind of
thing. And this one was the point that
I'm making for the point there.
When they tested these mosquitoes, they did it
to you.
Experimental use permit amended
to allow releases of specifically the o x
five zero three four, which is what Gates
is involved in, in Florida, California, also Texas,
plenty of other places. My point is to
show you on March 22 or sixth twenty
twenty two,
they amended
an ongoing
experimental permit
to drop these over your head.
So as I said, and it seemed to
get very little attention, are you aware that
the GM mosquitoes released in California and Florida
and elsewhere are an ongoing experiment? Are you
okay with that? Considering that there is provable
DNA contamination and that three to fifteen percent
do not die as designed, but actually get
stronger and then spread and here we are.
Same point. Right? It's exactly what she's talking
about.
Experimental use permit.
So if you're in those states, you should
be outraged that you're being used as a
test a test subject. Now it says in
October 2023, the EPA issued a final rule
under 40 c f r part one eighty
establishing a temporary tolerance exemption.
Sure. You got told about that. Right?
That allows the residue to remain on a
potato, saying, quote, this regulation eliminates the need
to establish a maximum permissible level of residue
of lid prona when used in accordance with
this exemption. Right. So the very fact that
we just don't have a limit makes it
okay to leave residue on there. That lines
up. Right? Sounds like they're just going, well,
if we don't settle it, we don't have
to care. Kinda feels that way. Now it
says nothing was written or observed about the
fish or birds that eat beetles being exposed
or killed by the insecticide. That's a major
part of what I go into in this
as well as the one I talk about
here in regard to,
oh, maybe it's not linked here. I did
one also about these
edible vaccines.
There it is.
Same thing. It overlaps a lot with the
same conversation. We talk about these edible vaccines
that were dropped for for animals.
Same thing. Edible transmissible live rabies vaccines air
dropped over US that include tetracycline. You know,
the same tetracycline if you're following these stories
that I talk about right here, which is
what's giving these mosquitoes the ability to circumvent
the trap. Right? So they use tetracycline over
here knowing that it actually is making I
think that's by design, quite frankly. The point
is that they don't care about the animals
that are being hurt or the the domestic
dogs and cats and and or the spraying
which kills the other bugs that might kill
those mosquitoes. And there's it's there's a and
this has been going on for years. People
experts on topic are telling you what you're
doing is actually causing the problem, probably by
design, guys. But it says, or what happens
to the mammals that eat the fish or
the bird that have eaten the d sRNA
exposed beetles? How long have they observed for
evidence or harm? They're doing that right now.
They claim that's the experiment being tested on
you and your kids and your family and
the animals in your environment. Safe and effective.
Right? The EPA will reevaluate the environmental impact
on the plants and local pollinators in three
years.
By that time, she writes, the genie will
be out of the bottle, never to return
if it if adverse effects are discovered or
occur within the Earth's micro microbiome.
Probably by design.
Continuing, she says, in 2021, the biotech startup,
Tirana Biosciences,
found founded was was founded after an initial
funding round of $50,000,000
invested by Flagship Pioneering, the same investors behind
Moderna.
Flagship Pioneering describes itself as a bio platform
innovation company. It defines the new RNA based
products this way, developing targeted products designed to
work at any time in a plant's life
cycle, enabling a continuous product pipeline
that is adaptive and responsive to variable climate
conditions. This is what I was talking about
so long ago in the conversation of Prairie
City Inc and the group that Canada gave
the rights to make GMO cannabis.
Way back then, they were working on putting
pharmaceuticals in plants.
You know, now this is just so far
beyond this. It's terrifying.
The developers of the new class of insecticides
are promising farmers, quote, climate resilience and crop
protection. But Tarana's new technology doesn't simply protect
plants from bugs.
It changes the plants, you know, just like
the COVID shots changed you.
They the spray on RNA delivers engineered RNA
molecules
into the plant through tiny tears in its
leaves. When the RNA enters the plant cells,
it can reprogram the plant. And all the
links are in here. It's directly from their
documentation. And they're even praising it in some
ways. Right? But it's if you if you
read their what they're saying or their tweets.
Unlike GMOs,
which are locked into seeds,
when this method is applied repeatedly,
it has the potential to change the plant
over and over again in real time.
Toronto CEO compared it to loading new software
into a computer.
Only the computer is your food, just like
the computer before was the platform for the
shots. Remember the plug and play Moderna thing?
Same funding.
There's something going on, guys, and this is
where it's going. Using the language of nature,
we can give plants new instructions. That's what
they wrote. Yielding adaptable solutions rooted directly in
the plant's natural physiology.
Our approach opens a new world of possibilities
in annual and perennial crops for the benefit
of farmers, people, and the planet. Okay. Even
if you think this is worth investigating,
ask yourself how in the world it makes
sense to test this in 10 states across
the country or wherever. You know? Just test
it in public, experimental use. Because the problem
she's pointing out is that this is not
something you can take back when you realize
it destroys all the food we can eat
or whatever.
And I don't think that's by accident, guys.
This is insane compared to even if it
turns out to be the best thing in
the world, doing this without knowing the consequences
is insane,
if not by design. Compared to Ledpura, Tarana's
RNA is a more advanced, is more is
far more advanced.
It doesn't remain on the surface of
leaves. It enters the plant and affects the
cells where they replicate. Tarana appears to have
submitted
an h an APHIS
field trial permit
for a tomato based RNA application.
Permit date, June 30, valid through 01/30/2026.
A field trial.
Okay. What if it happens, like, with Monsanto
and it it cross breeds with other I
mean, this is not a joke, and people
know this. Maha knows this, and they're doing
it anyway.
According to the article by Michelle Pero,
MD, published 07/31/2025,
quote,
oh, I guess it's not a quote. It
just simply is going I I thought there's
a quote from her article. It says, within
just a few years,
she cautions okay. That's she's framing the article.
She cautions these changes could ripple through and
destabilize
the entire food chain. At the very least,
you know that's clearly possible. And this is
impacting everything from pollinators like bugs and bees
to the delicate balance of the human gut
microbiome.
It's sir it starts to feel like humanity
itself is under attack. And quite frankly, people
like Katharine Fitts are telling you that. The
great poisoning.
And, really, and it's not about scaring anybody,
guys. This is based on literal, provable facts
we can see. And I'm not claiming I
have I know what the intention is.
Now here's a post from Valerie Ann Smith.
USDA approves double stranded DNA genetic modified apples
and potatoes. That was back in 02/2015,
but it is happening, guys. We're just no
one's really not talking about it. So she
goes on a list of bunch of the
things that are happening and really just highlights
the current high risk crops, meaning that they're
so prevalent in stores that can that consumers
must seek out and verify non GMO alternatives.
And just the list is crazy. I'll have
apples, broccoli, brussels sprouts, you know, all the
normal stuff. And she lists, by the way,
a lot of great material here about and
these are all studies. Cell.com,
NCBI.
RNA meal
changes honey bees' DNA genes just like it
changes you. This is important to understand. RNA
and we'll look into this more. We've already
done this, by the way, but important when
there's an opportunity, we'll bring these back up
and going in-depth. RNA fed to mice silences
DNA genes. GMO
RNAi
foods
already in the food supply chain.
See, these are the things that we need
to understand, and I these are important to
remember, guys.
And I'll just include this for you to
go through.
Did these things are already out there? I
don't know how you take that back.
Massey
has been calling this out. This is from
09/30/2023.
Thomas Massie exposes taxpayer funded, quote, transgenic edible
vaccines,
which turns edible plants like lettuce and spinach
into mRNA vaccine factories that replace mRNA shots.
It's not a joke. Now whether it's happening
or it's just an experiment or whether that
experiment's happening in your hometown,
I don't know. So they're going to other
than what we've shown you today, which we
do. So they're going to put the mRNA
poison into food supply. Well, it just this
is just their their personal opinion. The point
is that this has been debated back and
forth. Now quickly to wrap up,
Valerie Ann Smith also shared this clip. Now
it's something I think they made. It's a
compilation, and I'll play the actual discussion back
and forth, which I think in and of
itself is important to see. But she says,
edible mRNA, the threat of the engineered bioweapon
inserted into our food is real.
I agree.
Not who knows whether it's happening yet, but
oh, you know what? I did,
I knew I was gonna do that.
Yeah. I'm gonna play this one first. So
there's two clips I wanted to play that
she shared. This is from the last week.
All this money so that your apple wouldn't
brown when sliced.
So there's non browning apple and non browning
potato.
It uses something called double stranded RNA. Little
piece of RNA
is is created in these crops that silence
the gene
that normally causes the browning. Now many scientists
all over the world are concerned that that
little snippet that we eat might reprogram
or silence our DNA. I'll give you an
example. Honeybees
were fed a double stranded RNA meal, a
single meal that was supposed to be like
a control. In other words, no effect whatsoever.
Over a period of the next few weeks,
over 1,400
genes
change levels of expression compared to those that
didn't have that meal. So that's 10% of
the genome. We also know that certain mice
can change their gene expression when they are
eating double stranded RNA. So now we have
potatoes and apples that might change our genetic
expression. I think that's extremely dangerous.
Our regulatory agencies are are not prepared
to regulate and test the effects of double
stranded RNA. And in spite of those peer
reviewed published studies,
the USDA allowed her on the Yep. And
remember
what that I'll show you in a second.
What happened in in Tennessee when they tried
that, which is what I was gonna point
what I was pointing to, the way they
responded was ludicrous.
Well, are they there now? That's what they
said. He was like, well,
that's not the point. It's like, we wanna
make sure they're labeled. It's like, well, are
they do they exist? It's like, man, you
don't do that retroactively.
And I think that's actually but I don't
think these people are I I don't have
a high opinion of their intelligence, but I
don't think they're that stupid. I think that
was get to in a second. Here's the
other clip she played.
I don't understand the underlying
need or logic.
Because if a food source
has a human vaccine in it, we would
deem that a pharmaceutical in Tennessee to make
sure that we don't overdose or underdose that
food source.
I mean, how's this gonna play out? House
bill eighteen ninety four classifies any food that
contains a vaccine or vaccine material
as a drug under the Tennessee food Drug
and Cosmetic Act. So, I mean, think about
how crazy it is. That they're literally researching
how to do that. That's what he comes
out and says, well, let's get ahead of
this and make sure that we have a
label read. They act like he's insane.
Even though you can prove that it's clearly
happening, some of them act like it's not
even real. You know, there's
this is why largely I think a lot
of people in those positions are just there
because they are that stupid and are easy
to manipulate and only listen to the certain
sources who fed feed them what they want
and then others that are involved in the
problems and then hide it for their own
benefit. You know? Yes. I'm very pessimistic when
it comes to government. We have every reason
to be. Look at your own history.
I hope. I hope. Every day, I hope.
And I watch action. I watch precedent. I
watch what they do and have whether they
follow through, and I'm let down every single
time. Like you should be if you're being
honest about Trump, Biden, or all the rest.
Defines vaccine or vaccine material as a substance
intended for use in humans to stimulate the
production of antibodies
and provide immunity against disease that is authorized
or approved by the United States Food and
Drug Administration. Mister Chairman, I answer questions. Can
you give me an example of a food
that's a vaccine?
You're right. Yes, sir. University
of California, Riverside has already perfected the ability
to put human vaccines
into our lettuce right now. Right. Also tomato
also tomatoes has the ability to do that
also for UC Berkeley.
And then,
big tobacco, RJ Reynolds and stuff has perfected
the ability to put a human vaccine in
in the tobacco products.
Yes.
Indeed.
That was in Tennessee.
Now here's the clip. I think I want
I, the it kinda continues. Give me example
of a food that's a vaccine.
You're right, Gus. Yes, sir.
University of California Riverside has already perfected the
ability to put human vaccines
into our lettuce right now. Also tomato also
tomatoes
has the ability to do that also for
UC Berkeley.
And then,
Big Tobacco, RJ Reynolds and stuff has perfected
the ability to put a human vaccine into
into tobacco products.
Tobacco products, guys.
Why? Why would they like, it's I mean,
look. It's not like it's p like, there
this is the ridiculous argument that somehow people
are are just so afraid of needles. They
just don't wanna do it, but they would.
That's look at the statistics. That's just not
some people are, but no. It's because people
are dumb and they're recognizing the problems here
or they just don't want to or they
don't trust the government, whatever it is. This
is surreptitious. This is not about getting it
easier for you to digest. They have patches
they could do. This is about something else
entirely, and it's dark.
Chairman Clemons?
And is that even legal to do in
the state of Tennessee to Okay. Sell those
with a vaccine now?
Them? You're gonna ask, well, I'm not arguing
that point. What I'm saying is there is
no law Deeming those that when you go
into a grocery store You should know as
a consumer. This head of lettuce is a
head of lettuce The head of lettuce right
next to it could contain a vaccine in
it Yeah. All we're saying is if it
does have the vaccine in it, make sure
it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can
get the proper dosage. Doesn't that just seem
like well, aside from the idea that he
seems to be you know, maybe he's got
an ulterior motive in it. He's just trying
to set the normalization of it. Maybe like,
this is the point. And actually, that's the
bet one of the best points to make
in this is that instead of wanting saying,
like, should we even be doing this? Right?
You get this, where it's like, well, we're
either gonna label it or we're not. It's
like, well, everyone's gonna go, we'll label it,
which is sort of like backwardly getting you
to support something you don't wanna support. Now
I don't know whether that was his intention
or not. It's still worth making this point
regardless of that if that's the case. But
realize that the response is just wild. Like,
this is very clear that this is happening.
It is in the process. They can do
it. And so we should very first be
like, why are we even doing this? But
if we know this is coming and it's
inevitable, which I hope not, I honestly think
it's already happening, then we damn well better
have this in place to be able to
force them at least, you know and even
then, they'll break the law. They'll secret. They'll
the law. But at least some of this
will be something people like, here, I think
the largest win is that if this is
forced to happen, that people will then be
aware that that's possible.
Half the conversation, people dismiss this stuff.
You're a good listener.
Thank you. Well, my con my question is
is right now, can you walk into a
grocery store and there be a let head
of lettuce for sale that has a vaccine
in it? I don't think that's allowed under
state law presently.
And if it is
and you have to list it as a
Pharmaceutical.
Pharmaceutical,
are we going to then have
Walgreens pharmacists with a refrigerated section? I mean
This is just ridiculous. Like, I this feels
like a question and designed to make it
to muddle it and you know? I mean,
based on the idea that the this is
happening and we wanna make sure they get
the right dose,
makes it very specific about how this is
supposed to work, just simply labeling it to
understand whether or not.
And this is the way it goes. Just
gonna play out.
You're a Thank you. This is more of
a consumer protection bill right here. It's to
make sure that if you're going in to
buy tomatoes
and there's a polio vaccine in there, that
you are aware of what you're buying has
a polio vaccine. The problem you have is
if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical,
being the size and difference between you and
me, how many tomatoes do I have to
eat to get the proper dosage versus how
many tomatoes that you have to eat? And
if you eat too many, do you get
a a overdose?
God.
And, again, you know, you can look at
the whole clip. You know, the the the
point is they kinda look at him like
he's just losing his mind. You know? Like,
it's just it's
like, it's stupid. Like, it's irrational.
The science is there. They're telling you they're
successful at it. You can see people in
positions of government who are arguing that. And
your response is like, well, that's silly. You
know? It just shows me either these people
are that inept at what like, just lacking
just critical thinking in general
or that they're boxed out of that or,
like, just deliberately
staying away. Like, if you came out and
said there's another vaccine style coming out, we
wanna make sure people are aware it exists,
it's the same logic. And they'd be like,
well, that makes sense. Something around this is
very ridiculous. Very it's unsettling to see the
way they respond to it. And, again, to
the earlier point, whether it's because they're there
because they're this stupid or because they're this
willing, their shadow masters as David Ike puts
it, is actually did I close that? Oh,
no. I got the last couple here.
Oh, and I'll show you this too. I
thought I thought it was last ones. But
the point being is that, you know, they're
there because they're either that bad or stupid
or unable to, like, process the information or
because they're compromised enough or corrupt enough. I'm
I'm sorry to have this such a, you
know, pest, pessimistic view or just, like, bad
view of our government, but pessimistic.
But the point is it's very obvious
historically. I mean, just in this administration or
the last however many look at, these people
are not acting in your interest. And I'm
just so exhausted that people are out there
trying to say otherwise when it's
look. Look at how it ended. I mean,
it's always the other side that made it
happen. Fine. Whatever. Just acknowledge that it doesn't
ever happen. That's all I am and then
hopefully
understand that it's just the government, and that's
how it's always been. Now, I did this
and many others, by the way. This is
from 2021.
Self spreading vaccines, self amplifying
mRNA vaccines, and COVID vaccine, menstrual disruption,
2021.
If you support people who are giving you
the information that you can research, where you
can educate yourself on, their source material, you
can verify
way before you get this stuff anywhere else
than support the last American vagabond because our
his our track record speaks for itself.
Consistently, whether it's Israel, East Palestine, COVID nineteen,
Lahaina,
way ahead of the story. I mean, mean,
don't forget even Lahaina. We're like, this is
not just getting distracted. These points are we
put things out then become a center point
in the conversation
and never even get looked at again outside
of the people that follow this platform. Happens
over and over and over. And, look, it's
not about TLAB being focused. It's about the
information going the way it's supposed to. And,
yes, of course, we all want credit for
doing the work that we do. But at
the end of the day,
you'll be ahead of these stories if you
follow people that care about principle over partisanship.
Simple as that.
And and last again to recognize what David
Icke said in the beginning, which is what
I was referencing, the dumbest of dumb governments
in The UK, the dumbest of dumb governments
in The US, the dumbest of dumb governments
wherever you look. Coincidence?
Not a chance.
Dumb people do as their shadow masters tell
them.
They're too dumb to know any to do
anything else. And it's this is just a
person making a post about The UK, but,
guys, it's it's everywhere you look right now.
It is everywhere you look. You think these
things are unique to The United States? It's
everywhere. The UK and United States, you know,
Germany, Israel, they're leading this charge, and it's
insane.
Like, I'm to the like, it count it's
it's against
human interests, like the species.
At least in my opinion, look at what
we've seen. Maybe that's the whole point. Maybe
it's about somebody trying to use this as
a dual weapon. I don't know. But all
I know is that it's important that you
understand what the facts show and understand where
it's going and give you the opportunity to
say something about it, to stand up and
petition your government if you think it'll make
a difference, to stand up and protest if
you think it'll make a difference. You know,
educating yourself so you can be informed when
you make your choices.
Shocking how little that seems to happen today.
So thank you for tuning in. If you
wanna support this platform,
there's plenty of links in the chat. There's
links under every video.
Lastamericanbaggabond.com,
guys.
They'll be there for you. Thank you. As
always, I love you all. Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.