It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Reality. Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Wednesday, 08/06/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. An important
follow-up to yesterday's show on a few focus
points that I think are very important. Today
will likely be
shorter than what most usual TLAP followers are
used to, but maybe long for those that
are new today.
But it'll be shorter than a usual show
today. But focus on some important points that
I think are very relevant.
Interestingly, I, I only say that because I
usually put this in the front. I'm I'm
putting
the follow ups that I wanna show you
in regard to the,
disaster relief
post that has now been deleted, which I
find really interesting. But in the context of
news, it's not as important as stuff we'll
start with. But I'm gonna go over those
in the latter half, which won't be as
long as usual, as well as a document
or a a article that was going around
that has now been addressed already in regard
to a the the constitution post on the
US gov website
that
was basically removed all the sections around habeas
corpus and which they say was a glitch.
It's now back, but I just find that
really interesting, and we'll discuss a few points
around that that I think are obviously relevant.
But to start, we're gonna talk about what
appears to be really good news. Kennedy cancels
nearly $500,000,000
in mRNA vaccine contracts.
Now I'm gonna get into what I think
about that and and what we already talked
about, not jumping the gun until we see
actual action begin to happen, not just announcements.
And as far as I can tell, that's
where we are at the moment. Even if
actual, like, you know, HHS handing down cancellations,
until I see these things stop being produced,
I'm not gonna jump the gun, like, regardless
of the side. But I think this is
really good news, and I get the sense
this is where it's gonna go. But I'm
I'll I'll, as usual, give you my objective
perspective on why that may be and
overlap this with Stargate and all the different
things that are seemingly still going on. We're
gonna talk about, in regard to an interesting,
an event or an incident that took place
in regard to an IDF member in The
United States and
the interesting conversation around that after he was
attacked and somebody spray painted death to the
IDF
and how that that's being, you know, discussed
by our government and then overlapping that with
the points kind of, continuation of yesterday's point
or many other shows in the past around
infiltration of this government.
And we're gonna talk about a really interesting
point that I'm really
because today will be shorter, I've there I've
I've plans to go into some depth around
a couple of these different topics that I
have been saying I have done around, for
example,
Prospera,
which is one of these sort you know,
Freedom City,
what do they what's the other term they
use? It's, you know, like some libertarian freedom
cities they're calling. It's just not. It's I've
gone over it very clearly, and I'm even
the even the freedoms Freedom City ideas
pretty obviously not the way it's being presented.
But we're gonna go over this in in
in, kind of
look at these two stories alongside each other,
and that is the idea of the Freedom
City point. But what just went around today,
yesterday, around and really before this. It's been
brought up before. But right now, it's getting
focused on
federalizing
the Washington DC and what that means and
whether or not that is sort of just
a
something a narrative around this to justify where
this may be going. And these are all
hypotheticals. But I wanna go over what is
happening and go over what this means and
where this seems to be going and why
this is important and all the people that
seem to be interconnected on all these different
points. And weirdly enough, this story starts with
none other than what's,
Big Balls was his name, the guy that
worked for Doge,
who ended up being in Washington DC and
got beat up. And now Elon Musk and
the rest are pointing to that as the
reason this needs to happen. I just find
this really hard to seems highly unlikely, but
we'll go through it all. Let's start today
with this important point
that I really do think is is good
news. And I do what I what I
oops. I forgot surprised I forgot to do
that. Just for the podcast, re reorganizing
my window here, get it right size. But
my point is that this is
good news regardless.
Right? Like, so if this
is
a effort to to shift us to a
new direction or if mRNA vaccines are not
necessarily what they're focused on right now, it
is still a positive thing to see this
because there's plenty of people out there as
assuming this goes the way it should and
the way I think it will.
There's plenty of people out there, people that
support RFK, support Donald Trump, who still think
that these things are helping people.
And, you know, in fact,
now let's read the arc first. I was
thinking I'm gonna play a clip from Donald
Trump that just came out that I think
is relevant, but or maybe you know what?
Since let's watch it first, and then we'll
watch it again afterward and kinda think about
what it means. But this is Donald Trump
recently asked about this,
and this is so Kennedy spoke up and
said this, we're gonna be canceled.
So Donald Trump asked about this. In a
moment of, like, really, like, finally, an actual
question from these people asking
why that's, you know, basically, not just this
point, but the larger picture of how Trump
stance is not completely contradictory to what all
of his base says.
Wow. What a real question that should that
could have been asked every day for the
last five years, but finally gets asked. And
the way he responds is very telling, and
then we'll go through what this is and
where I see this going and and my
thoughts on why it might be not exactly
what we may hope it is.
But just that point alone about Donald Trump's
stance on this seems to be very strange.
And and even then in this clip, he
makes it clear that Warp Speed and these
shots were a godsend, amazing, and I don't
know how that makes sense even in this
conversation. We'll come back to this point. Driving
force behind Operation
Warp Speed, these mRNA vaccines that are the
gold standard. Right. Now your health secretary
is pulling back all the funding for research.
He's saying that the risks outweigh the benefits,
which puts him at odds with the higher
medical community and with you. What is going
on?
For your answers. Like, that's
it. You know, as obviously, that could have
been asked so many times.
What you keep saying about these being amazing
has been contradicted by, I mean, every other
part of your entire group. RFK Jr and
your and your entire base and, I mean,
everything.
And he keeps doubling down on this, keeps
saying that they're saving lives, and it's amazing.
And RFK come in saying these things were
really dangerous, and there's no mRNA in general.
Is it and then that's why we thought,
okay. Wait. Stargate?
MRI platform, self amplifying bird flu shots? You
know, another platform on top all these different
things. And that that's the Stargate was one.
There was also the the,
you know, all the different points we've gone
over. There's plenty of them. And it just
didn't make much sense, and so a lot
of us were confused. Now in a in
a, you know, a thought of of hopefulness
and positivity,
not that I necessarily think it's where it's
going, but we should consider it. Maybe this
just is what people have been hoping for.
Maybe this is RFK Junior doing what he
said he was gonna do and that he
has influence
over Trump, and we're gonna finally see it
start going.
I don't believe that's what's happening, but every
single one of us should be going, please.
Please. I hope that's what's happening. Because people
out there that want to like, don't want
anything good to happen because they don't wanna
be happy with Trump is just it's that's
I think, the minority, honestly, in the conversation,
but there's too many of them out there
on left and right. And so we should
really be hoping for that. As much as
I don't believe these people are being honest
with us about a lot of things, it's
still something we should hope for, that I'm
wrong, that we that these things carry out
and they cancel all this and it was
all one big 14,000,000 d chess move to
trick the other side. I certainly hope so.
But my point being is that this is
an indication of that maybe going in that
direction. All the other points we keep seeing,
I just don't think are what they claim.
The gain of function and and, really, I'll
go over this couple more points as we
go forward, but there's been a lot of
deliberate,
like, on the surface, deliberate manipulations.
Gain of function was not ended. They all
pretended they did, and they just didn't do
that. And so they lied to you. So
if this was the way it was going,
why would that be necessary? Right? Or the
lies about any number of other things that
are sort of being repackaged when it's not
really what they are, which I'll go to
some of the points in a moment. Let's
keep watching this. Research on what? Into masks
outweigh the benefits, which puts them at odds
with the higher medical community and with you.
What is going on? Research on what? Into
mRNA vaccines. Well, we're gonna look at that.
We're talking about it, and they're doing a
very good job. And, you know We're gonna
look at it. Doesn't really feel like a
ringing endorsement. It sounds sort of like, well,
Tulsi Gabbard said this. I don't care what
she has to say. You know? That's the
feeling. Like, not it's been discussed and we
canceled it, but, well, we're gonna look at
that. We're gonna discuss that. And I also
find this weird thing he keeps doing where
he keeps acting like he has no idea
what's going on in his own administration, which
with that's going on, we'll get to that
about Epstein, that he didn't know that Ghislaine
Ghislaine was moved,
which I people are simply saying that's just
flatly not true. And then he there's not
even it's anyway, we'll get to that in
a second. But this is you know, that
how do you do we really wanna pretend
that he didn't know about a $500,000,000
cancellation of massive, you know, that's
business. And he didn't know about that, that
he doesn't have influence on that? No. It's
not it's certainly in the realm of possibility
that he wouldn't
be, I guess it's even saying that feels
unlikely, but then he wouldn't be included in
something like this. It's possible.
But I just think it's interesting that even
the response seemed like he just want what
about what? Oh, yeah. Yeah. Jump right into
it. Like, I like, he my impression is
that he knew exactly what they were going
with that, but he wanted to give the
impression that he's I I I'm not really
the one. I'm just you know, they're under
me, and I'm just you know, it's it's
like a like a a buffer of of
not involved so he doesn't get criminally accountable.
It's kind of the way I feel about
it, but you can decide. But note that
action. He does it a lot. Like, with
Marco Rubio, for example, in USAID. He was
like, that's his thing, and he's the one.
Maybe hope maybe worried there because there were
a lot of legal challenges around the way
they did that and maybe still coming around.
That is, we're talking about it, and they're
doing a very good job. And, you know,
that is
a pass with operation warp speed That is
he is was whether a passed.
So, I mean, my point is that's in
the past. He says it again in a
second. But what's in the past?
Warp speed?
You're right. So is he implying that mRNA
is a thing of the past? I certainly
hope so. But, you know, there's indications all
over the place that's not really the direction.
I mean, $500,000,000,000
Stargate program doesn't just get tossed aside, especially
with all I mean, I certainly hope it
does, but with Oracle
and OpenAI
and and SoftBank and all the Israel infiltration
around all of those things, That's just, you
know, that's true, but that's my I that's
how I I add that because I think
that's important.
But doesn't that I mean, that's an AI,
mRNA
platform around cancers the way they framed it,
but so you're just gonna stop all? I
mean, that's just seems hard to believe, but
I hope so. Be a Republican or Democrat
considered one of the most incredible things I'm
gonna let the rest of your play. Those
are the points I wanna get on the
opening, but listen to what he says because
I think the fact that he still praises
this is hard to to stomach. Good job.
And, you know, that is
a pass with operation warp speed
was, whether you're Republican or Democrat, considered one
of the most incredible things ever done in
this country.
The efficiency,
the,
the way it was done, the distribution,
everything about it
was has been amazing. Sure. But, you know,
that was,
now a long time ago. Oh, wow. And
we're on to other things. But we are
speaking about it. We have meetings about it
in, tomorrow, actually, tomorrow at 12:00,
and we'll determine.
We're looking for other answers to other problems,
to other sicknesses and diseases,
and I think we're doing really well. Yes,
ma'am. Yeah. Yeah. Non answer. Right? That's the
typical way, but that's not him. It's politicians.
It's what they do. You know? Doing great
things. We're on the way. We'll talk about
it, and we'll get there. And, you know,
there no real definitive answer about his contradiction
to what he says.
Right? I mean and so, one other thing.
What do you say there?
But, you know, that was, This is why
I always stop it when I'm listening because
I forget what Now a long time ago.
And So, you know, a long time ago.
You know, it really obviously wasn't, not in
the context of other than maybe the twenty
four hour news cycle that makes everybody think
yesterday was a, like, you know, infinite time
ago. But
I think what's happening is his you know,
I think he's so used to being able
to just suggest
what people should think about a thing, and
they all do. Right? And so in this
case, it's sort of like, oh, Epstein? You're
still talking about Epstein?
That is insane that he even did that
knowing that he everyone knows what largely his
supporters thought. So that's him trying to coordinate
trying to manipulate you into going away from
what you believe in because he said, oh,
I'm not supposed to think that? Okay. Didn't
work. Right? So now they're trying to do
other things. Same thing here. Oh, that's old
news. We're going a different direction, which is
a is worry what I worry about is
is something I mentioned a few times already,
but really now is when it's starting to
look like that's what might happen or I
worry about, is that it's not necessarily about
the injections anymore.
That whether it ever really was, guys, I
honestly think a large part of what it
is is we can see the direction now
was about wherever this technocratic,
AI driven whatever is building into and the
genetic overlap. Like, we talked about the biodigital
convergence. We've talked about the idea of patenting
life. All of these things have to do
with what they gained right there. Yesterday, we
talked about Illumina Inc, an Israeli overlap company.
We actually, by the way, mentioned Microsoft on
top of that. Just today, there's a story
about Microsoft
overlapping with Israel in a data issue. I
that's exactly what I talked about yesterday.
The point, though, is that you can see
how all of these things, these moving parts
around COVID nineteen, the the genomic information, the
surveillance, the everything is it it overlaps with
not just the AI part, not just technocracy,
but how those things intertwine with the biological
direction, like, in regard to the biodigital convergence
or the idea of the fifth industrial revolution,
which he tells you, Klaus Schwab and every
the every one of the rest of them,
that this when those things would happen, and
they tell you that's where we are.
Now think about all that, you know, and
the idea that so when they go, we're
gonna go away from mRNA. And, again, hypothetically
right now, it hasn't technically happened yet, but
that we will be talking about, you know,
what other aspects are involved in this. And
he said alternative. Now does that mean not
mRNA,
or does that just mean
no longer mRNA injections?
It's worth considering because I thought about that
a while ago that this might have been
a means to an end and it was
about some you know, experimentation about whatever else,
and that the real action was not just
about an injection, but whatever the means is
to progress
the agenda, the experiments, the the technology. And
that doesn't have to be this one field.
And that clearly,
what's the old the old metaphor that, you
know, you can you can,
was it shear a sheep once? I forget
how that goes. But the point being is,
you know, you can do something once and
or you can, you know, go all the
way and, you know, like, essentially if I
forget the term for it, though. But, you
know, if you go too far, you can,
you know, you can't like, let's just make
it. You can slaughter it once, but you
can shear it many times. I don't think
it's a term. But the point is you
get the logic of it. Is that it
I think that's what they did with that
narrative is they went way too far and
people are like, no way. Not even half
most democrats at this point are, like, very
concerned about at least that direction as far
as I can see. So finishing oh, and
that was it. We finished it already. So
the point is he is kinda waffling about,
you know, we'll talk about it. Doesn't seem
to be a ringing endorsement of where this
is going. And also the fact that that
might not be the only thing they're going
for, and there's also currently things that I
think aren't being canceled around this area, but
we'll find out as this goes forward. So
here is the
article from New York Times.
This came out today
or excuse me, yesterday. That's crazy. I thought
that's the sixth. Kennedy cancels nearly 500,000,000
in mRNA vaccine contracts.
Now in this is riddled with all sorts
of pro COVID nineteen vaccine,
you know, lockdown. Everything we did was great,
which, by the way, seems to be kind
of what Trump is saying, but not you
know, he'll not say lockdowns were good, but
clearly, there are everything around the parts he
was involved in in the vaccine side of
it. This is fault in everything. But, hell,
RFK Jr. Has canceled nearly $500,000,000
in grants and contracts for developing mRNA vaccines.
Not just everything mRNA overlap, genetic, you know.
And if we're talking about alternative stuff, remember,
there's all sorts of intertwining problems with that
on the alternative path too, or the idea
of,
genetic treatments. Like, that's what this ultimately was,
genetic
editing,
not really injection. So that right there could
be a deviation. But it says the Department
of Health and Human Services announced this, and
this was announced yesterday. It is the latest
blow in to research on this technology as
they frame it. In May, the Department of
Health and Human Services revoked a nearly $600,000,000
contract to Moderna, which we talked about. But
remember,
that was all that that carried over. Now
it could just be something they just fell
by the wayside, but that was allowed to
go quite far until, as they say,
where was it? In May,
they finally did pull back that money. But
as we highlighted, there was progress of it.
That was already that was going. They that
had been awarded just before they took over
for Biden, and then it carried through. And
and then we were like, well, Stargate platform,
self amplifying shot, so it's kinda kinda makes
sense. And then they pulled that one. I
said, okay. Well, that's good, but what about
all the others? It kinda doesn't feel like
that makes sense. But so then it goes
on to say, oh, continuing, the health department
said in its release that the cancellations affected
22 projects
managed
by BARDA.
So I'd love to see what those are.
As my point, guys, is from my research
so far and as always, let me know
if I'm missing something. But from my research,
it doesn't appear anything is actually this has
been an announcement made. There's been movement probably
in some, like, you know, the background paperwork
side of this, but I haven't seen anything
official either posted or actually in action.
And trust me, I'll be the one of
the first to tell you because I certainly
I really hope this is what's going on.
But when the 22 projects, my point is
we'll get to find out what those may
be. And does that apply to Stargate? Does
it apply to all the things they're all,
you know, alternatively or rather tangentially working on?
Mister Kennedy has been sharply critical of the
technology, which he has,
up until basically getting into Trump's administration and
then waffled about it in places where he
was really strong before or endorsed the team
that said these things were safe and effective,
both from the FDA and EPA, everywhere.
All the different comments. People even people that
weren't necessarily involved in it were coming out
and saying, you know, things that there's a
lot of weirdness over here, by the way,
like with the EPA overlap with what they
were doing with Zeldin. There's so many weird
things going on that don't seem to align
with what we think their jobs are, which,
you know, that speaks to things we've talked
about a lot in the past. The their
jobs are just whatever they are to keep
you in line. But
he's been very critical for a very long
time. Same with the MMR shot. And also
then turned and said that one was okay.
You know, just there's something going on here.
I think we all knows that. In a
video posted on social media on Tuesday, he
claimed incorrectly, New York Times claims, that MRA
vaccines do not protect against respiratory illness like
COVID and the flu. He he's right. That
they drive viruses to evolve. Some people will
have an issue with that. That and that
a single mutation in a virus renders the
vaccine infective.
Now regardless of that side this side and
important conversation, my point is really about when
we're talking about the respiratory issue. Right? The
idea
was based on the logic from before, not
necessarily buying all of the narrative around the
law that, you know, the the idea of
these things, but the idea that I think
it was doctor Bakhti who made it clear
that you can't you can't vaccinate in the
shoulder for a respiratory virus illness. Even Fauci
made similar points, and yet they all seemingly
went forward with this because we were being
tested on it. I think that's pretty obvious
at this point.
So when he says that, he's right. And
all of the peer reviewed science, or rather,
let's be clear, the body, the the large
majority of that science does also back that
up. Then it's not like a headline that
says they don't work for respiratory viruses, but
if you read the actual data and talk
to the experts, that's what these things are
clearly showing you. And look at what we
went through. Look at the outcome, guys. It's
pretty obvious, and Trump still sides with these
things. And it says that they drive viruses
to evolve and that the single mutation could
change that. But, arguably,
that's not necessarily
different than the other wholesale versions as far
as I understand it. There still can be
mutations. These things can still happen. The mRNA
thing arguably does drive that faster. There there
are many different points. Faster is probably not
the right word. More
I guess that works. Rapid. You know, like,
where you see more
manipulation happening.
But so my point, though, is that these
things
were called out. We all knew them. And
now, finally, they're stopping them.
But, ultimately, now they're attacking him for the
things that we all seem to have accepted.
So I guess I'm wondering where the New
York Times and the kind of the corporate
coverage of this is going.
You know, I just don't see how we
go back to the same direction is kind
of what I'm getting at. I just don't
I feel like this might be, like, an
engineered sort of pullback from this direction in
hopes that we give them a win for
it and ultimately that we miss the next
step. Always consider that. Now it says, the
health department said it will forever or favor
other types of shots
over those using mRNA. So that's also interesting.
And it says, like wholesale vaccines, which I
find super interesting, whereas all the Maha people
out there, that ROK has called out wholesale
vaccines many different times. And so now we're
stepping back away from mRNA. Good good news
if that actually happens. But then, at least
in one case, pointing to wholesale vaccines.
Right? And so these are the ones we've
seen in the past can have potential issues
with people actually getting infected with all sorts
of different things. And so he's also called
these things out. I just find that interesting.
But on top of that, there's plenty of
people, especially in Maha and conservative movements, that
don't want any vaccines. They were convinced he
was going to go, no. They're all bad,
which in many cases, he's never ever been
every single one as bad, but he's had
plenty of criticisms about just the general way
they're made. And the same kind of point
I've made in the past, that not that
I know for sure every single thing, but
that if they're all, like if they were
responsible for the COVID injections and it's the
same people who are blindly rubber stamping the
other ones, then we should be looking at
all of this. But here we are going
back into the same old practice. Now it
says that technology is more than a 100
years old. The United States has not used
a wholesale vaccine for whooping cough since nineteen
nineties. He particularly called it out around whooping
cough because it was potent but harsh, often
setting off high fevers and seizures. You know,
like most of them, to be honest, not
all on the exact level of how severe
they are, but the idea that these this
is natural to have these terrible things that
happen, that that's showing you there's something wrong
in my opinion. Mister Kennedy himself assailed the
leading international vaccine organization, Gavi,
the vaccine alliance, for continuing to use the
wholesale vaccine in low incoming countries, citing it
as the reason The United States was pulling
funding from the organization. But at least in
one direction, it seems to be shifting into.
Now all super preliminary, guys. So I I
think we we have to you know, we
should stress caution and and, you know,
patience. Let's wait and see what happens here.
But, you know, call the thing I mean,
look, there's no reason we shouldn't still be
calling out all the other things that we
see. But I think what I'm I'm interested
to see where this goes and whether or
not this might actually be a positive step,
but, you know, while considering all the different
ways that it could go awry. Now the
Stargate thing I just think is really hard
to decouple from this.
We know this is happening. Trump was all
about this, and these people are may you
know, these are very wealthy, very influential people
that are that have put time and effort
into this. Now based on what I can
find, I haven't seen any
tangible
results from this.
Right? So, I mean, there there's a lot
of statements. There's been investigatory actions. There's been
partnership, but we haven't seen, as far as
I can tell, unless we're missing something,
actual
action around using this to develop some kind
of drug. And so that's what I was
interested by to see if if this is
in the mix. Is that going to be
canceled with this? And, you know, and and
is that or is it gonna be left
away? You know, how how do we see
this? Will he market these as genetic editing
for cancer, which is really what they are.
Right? So I we'll have to wait and
see. But I just find it hard to
believe that this platform for specifically mRNA
AI driven drugs is going to be removed
when so much has been put into it.
And this one, by the way, this is
the the self amplifying
bird flu shot.
It seems interesting that these things would be
pulled back after they started under RFK's administrate
or rather Trump, but RFK being in the
administration.
Realize. I mean, this happened in April.
So what are we to make from that?
The the reason I'm pointing to this is
because he was there. So does that mean
that he wasn't making these decisions, or did
he make them and now he's changing his
mind? I mean, how do you make sense
of that? So all of this just leaves
me uncomfortable.
What's actually happening here? Will it go in
the right direction? I'll go back to the
original point that regardless of their intent, if
they actually stop mRNA in any direction, I
think that's a positive outcome. All that really
shows you is that by our awareness and
our constant, you know, calling them for their
for their BS,
they're ultimately forced to take steps like this
that, you know, even if it's just a
steam you know, a a release valve to
get us to stop paying attention, we cause
that by calling these things out. And that's
the real point of what we do here.
All of us, everyone, you in the chat,
being keep holding their feet to the fire
so they can actually, whether they want to
or not, whether they are good people or
not, do what is in their best interest.
And right now, let's hopefully make that whatever
we're calling for, like, as the people of
this country.
Now this again is the clip that we
just played in the beginning.
So as Brad Miller says, too few Americans
have the balls to call Warp Speed what
it is, treason.
The COVID op is still killing Americans, and
yet most people refuse to care. So here's
Donald Trump today or rather I I believe
this was today saying
it was amazing that everyone, Democrat, Republican alike,
think it was amazing. That's just not even
true. There's plenty of people in congress that
will call it out,
but really not do anything about it because
I think that's the biggest problem.
But what do you guys think? You know?
Where is this gonna go? I think we
should put a pin in this until we
see more action, but get ready for the
waterfall of people coming out and telling you
this just changed the world. Right? Already chain
which I'm I'm I want to point out
this is a very great step, at least
even the even the nod toward it. But
as always, we get people that jump the
gun. I'll make a point even the point
about, like I I actually took it off
today because I we don't have as much
time. The Obama thing, The alleged grand jury,
which wouldn't surprise me if they go forward
with something.
But it's just been announced by the corporate
media and Bondi that nothing has actually, as
far as I can tell, from either the
DOJ or anywhere else, actually started or happened.
Like, I I shouldn't say it like that
because they could be doing things, but, like,
you know, there's no DOJ post about it.
So as far as we're concerned, it's simply
been floated.
And I don't know why anybody out there
would keep I mean, there's people that I
usually point to who keep reiterating as of
today that it has been convenient. It is
going on. It is well, maybe. It wouldn't
be surprising,
but it hasn't technically happened yet. And how
often have we seen things that state
and then something shifts and that we didn't
we wanted to, but now we can't. Whatever.
It's just the point is how often they
don't actually come to pass. And weirdly, it
overlaps. We'll get to in a minute about
the Epstein thing. I find this really strange
right now that we keep I mentioned this
in yesterday's show that so they're calling for
the grand jury around Obama, you know,
Russiagate, which by the way, again, they've I
think all of them should be in jail,
not just the left or just the right,
but but in the context of Russiagate, yes.
They committed crimes, but plenty of them committed
far more serious war crimes all over the
world, and all of them should be in
prison.
But, also, you've got the Epstein point where
they're now being subpoenaed. Weirdly, like, almost the
exact same list.
In that case, just Democrats, though, are only
subpoenaing the Democrats around Epstein, but they keep
talking about it like, you know, here is
a grand jury around Russiagate,
and now they're being subpoenaed.
But for Epstein,
I just there's something weird about the those
are being mashed together, but maybe I'm just
reading it wrong. You tell me what you
think.
So let's go to the next point on
this.
Now, this is important, I think, because this
overlaps with, you know, even what we just
talked about, by the way. There's plenty of
ways to overlap that if you you know,
not just looking for it, but provable connections
to that agenda with exactly what we're gonna
get into now. But this first is just
about the interesting framing of this. This is
from the New York Post. American who served
an IDF targeted
in hateful anti Semitic attack. Now, yeah, could
it have been motivated by racism? Sure.
Could it have been motivated by the fact
that these people watching IDF commit genocide in
the world made them upset? Sure. That too.
Maybe both. You know? The fact that everyone's
just blindly assuming that it was about the
fact that they were Jewish,
it just it seems insane to me that
we're acting like this still makes sense.
And the same thing I said before, if
it's it's this is the equivalent of somebody
in the midst of the Nazi party committing
a genocide,
going up and spray painting death to Nazis
on the front street out out front one
of their homes
and then getting upset about that. Now, yeah,
look. Was there a crime committed? It should
matter whether or not they're a Nazi or
whether or not they're IDF. Yeah. It should
matter. So if they broke into their car
and set it on fire, then re arrest
them for that. Charge them for, what would
be more than vandalism? Because it would be
more. I forget what the term is. Charge
them. Put them in jail for it. But
to then make this about something more and
then turn it into some national event when
you obviously understand that the whole world sees
what they're doing and and look. It doesn't
mean just because he's in the IDF, therefore,
he should be called guilty. That's fair to
say, by the way. There are people in
the IDF who have protested.
But just to be objective. But look. I
see it. The vast majority of them are
not just
going through the motions, which is also bad
when you're committing crime, but are okay with
it. They're happy with it, posting them, and
that's not my opinion. There's a lot of
the people in Israel, though, that do call
this out. But my point, though, is you
understand why somebody who's watching this livestream, watching
their own politicians tell you that it's okay
children starve to death, and then get upset
about it.
Right? I mean, there's just it's, like, the
simplest thing in the world. And then watching
somebody come home in their IDF uniform and
their and just being outraged about that. I'm
just saying you can understand why somebody might
do that. Now this is being framed everywhere
where you look by American politicians as anti
Semitic and hateful. Well, didn't didn't we just
get done talking about from the Republicans that
hate crimes and hate speech were really fake
things? Crimes are crimes. Speech is speech.
I don't understand why we think this crime's
more important because you think before even knowing
for sure that they had racial intent.
Even if they do, how does that change
the crime? What's the crime?
Violence, vandalism,
or, you know, anything. Murder? Then it should
be those crimes. It shouldn't be murder plus
because they did it for bad reasons. It's
all subjective, and it's used against us in
every possible case.
So American who served with Israel.
So to me, I find that important as
well as we're gonna go through this next
clip. Why in the world, in any context,
it's okay for an American to go work
in a foreign military?
What is that okay? Can they go work
in China? I I don't even think Americans
can go to join the British army, but
here we are where people are drifting over
to a genocide committing government and working with
them and then floating back into the country.
No big no big deal. I mean, that
seems wild to me. I'm not implying anything
other than the fact that that should upset
people, that one, it is a contradiction. Two,
it's obviously a security risk of the way
they're framing everything else. But it's an American.
He has a right to come into this
country, but he also has a right to
to
own
the actions they're committing in that genocide.
That not to the point of crime, not
to the point that he has to do
it. But if somebody wants to come up
and say, I think you're committing genocide. You
know how crazy that gets today? People are
acting like that should you should be put
in prison for the rest of your life
because you hate Jews. Did anybody even say
that? Your committing a genocide gets turned into
that, and that becomes the issue. So an
American who served with the IDF has his
car torched and had death to the IDF
scrawled outside. That's the gist of it, by
the way. So you tell me how anybody
who is an investigator,
a detective,
a judge, anybody is gonna go, well, must
be Jews. It must be hatred.
You can easily go, well, maybe that played
a factor. Maybe that was the driving force,
but we don't know that.
Clearly, the IDF committing genocide might just be
enough for people to be upset.
Hateful vandals, because the New York Post is
so objective these days. Right? Hateful vandals targeted
the idea of Veterans Home in in in
Saint Louis,
Tuesday, according to the head of Trump administration
and anti semitism
task force. That was Leo Terrell,
who, guess what, guys,
didn't find out about this through the news,
didn't find out about this because Trump briefed
him. He found out because the Israeli embassy
called him.
The Israeli government calls people in the US
government. It goes, this just happened. Do something.
And guess what he did? He jumped up
and he immediately posted about it and has
been
driving this forward ever since.
Based on the fact that it's about the
IDF, and you're gonna turn this he is
the, what do they call him?
Yeah. The head of the antisemitism
task force. Right? So the head of you
have no rights if it's about Israel in
the United States task force. I don't care
what you think about it. I don't care
if it literally is about racism.
The idea that you have an American
government task force that is about stopping you
from speech is just absolutely insane.
But that's where we are. It's not just
Trump, but it sure as hell is exploding
in this administration.
Graffiti scrawled on the road also accused the
victim of being a murderer.
Yeah. Is anyone gonna balk at that right
now? I could I mean, I could scroll
to the next page and show you 75
pictures of people being murdered in Gaza today,
and children starving to death, and IDF members
laughing and doing TikTok dances about it. So
I'm pretty sure people are not okay. That
doesn't mean everybody everywhere. I made that clear.
I'm only highlighting why it's easy for people
if you can understand why people might act
irrationally.
He says, quote, I reviewed the graphic footage
of the vehicles belonging to the family and
their friends. The vehicles were set on fire
and destroyed. Hateful graffiti in the family's home
accused of accused of being a murderer and
called to for death to the IDF.
Now if somebody had gone and done this
to
a British veteran who lives in the country
or, you know, see, the problem is it
would be an American who worked in the
British army, which doesn't seem to exist. But
you can just make it an American veteran.
The reason I didn't say that is because
that alone you know, that would get people
riled up in its own right. But let's
say somebody goes after an American veteran who
come back came back from Iraq and said,
you're a murderer, and burned his car and
rather they didn't say it, wrote it on
the front of the street.
Did death to the American military.
Burned his car and said, they raped and
murdered in Iraq because, you know, they did,
and we can prove that in court. It's
been discussed all over the place. We don't
know that look back. Horrible things, by the
way. Some of the worst I've ever seen,
to be honest, outside of what's going on
in Israel, where commanders were literally ordered people
were ordered by their leadership to rape people
in front of them. Guys, if you don't
believe that, you need to look back at
what happened in Iraq. The point is that
if they did that, if they did that
to an American military person, that probably would
barely make the news. Now, yes, it would
cause there'd be outrage stories about it, rightly
so, because it's just you know, it's your
you well, I mean, look. The point is
about the crime. But you could understand why
people will be outraged about it from an
American exceptionalism,
jingoism mindset.
My point, though, is that that would not
even come close to the kind of coverage
this is getting.
I don't know why that doesn't speak for
itself. I mean, it does, actually. I shouldn't
say that. I think everyone's starting to see
it across left and right, but at one
I guess I should say I wonder why
at up until now, it hasn't had that
weight.
Now it says it wasn't immediately clear how
long the victim had served with the Israeli
military or exactly when he returned to The
United States. Oh, that's comforting. Right? Who knows?
He might be a spy. Who cares, though?
That guy's a racist.
Meanwhile, cops said they were, probing the incident
as a hate crime.
Okay. So cops are looking into it as
a possible hate crime, and yet everybody's already
reporting it as an absolute hate crime, and
we know it Because objective journalism is the
way to go today. Right? No arrests have
yet been made.
This is more than vandalism. It is a
hateful act of intimidation
and only the latest example of what happens
when antisemitic
and anti Israel rhetoric are normalized.
Right. Because of the same thing. Right? You're
not allowed to go, Israel's breaking the law
because you must hate Jews.
That's how this works, guys, and you damn
well know it.
Leo Terrell says, today, the Israeli embassy alerted
me, him, to a horrific antisemitic attack in
Saint Louis.
And again, this is what they're we we
don't know that yet, do we? They don't
know. This has yet to be proven.
American citizen who served the idea of return
to his family home, soon soon after he
and his family were targeted.
Maybe or maybe just him. I reviewed graphic
footage of vehicles. You see, the language there
is meant to imply it's about the Jewish
family, That these people have an agenda. It's
not it's it's about one of the most
obvious things in the conversation today. I reviewed
graphic footage of vehicles belonging to the family
and their friends, the victim. The vehicles were
set on fire destroyed. Hateful graffiti outside the
family's home accused him of being a murderer
and called for death the IDF. That's all
that's that's it.
Now, again, you you could just you know,
I shouldn't say it like it's nothing. Right?
My point, though, is it's not about anything
other than the IDF, the military, and the
fact that he works there as an American
and that he's taking part in genocide. That's
what's happening. I immediately contact the FBI, he
said, which is engaged,
engaging the Saint Louis team. Right. So, apparently,
until Israel reached out, this wasn't happening.
Alerted attorney general Pam Boddi's office. I spoke
directly with the family so they know that
the DOJ task force to combat the Semitism
is on this. I'm outraged. Anti Semitic violence
has no place in America. Well, violence.
Right? That will be the point. Violence. No.
Violence is okay. Anti Semitic violence is completely
off limits.
Not in Saint Louis and not anywhere. We
will pursue every avenue to bring the perpetrators
to some
Medicaid crimes,
you will be caught.
Now if you do this to white people,
you know, half don't really care, will feign
action. But, yeah, you you say you, you
know, you sneeze hard at Israel, and we're
gonna burn your house down. That's that's how
this feels right now. It's, like, just wildly
over the top. And okay. And let let's
be clear. Regardless of whether it is about
actual racism or not,
people who are speaking about, like, that, you
know, antisemitic,
people
pro Palestine are called that, people who are
coming out and saying Jewish people shouldn't exist.
It's all still speech, guys.
And people will say that, as I always
point out, I would say they were disgusting,
but I defend your right to say it.
Because that's what real free speech looks like.
Not people like this. These are fakes.
Now, on the point of what the IDF
we're doing, let's realize, The IDF, I think
this is one of only or one of,
like, five or six that I've seen. I
mean, I'm I forget. I I think it
was it's five it's we've talked about this.
You tell me in the chat how many
times we've showed shown IDF,
members whistleblowing about what's going on. It's been
quite a few. This is, I think, one
of the first I saw. IDF whistleblower admits
institutional war crimes are openly being committed in
Gaza. Now you've seen this clip, but since
somebody might be new, we'll play it really
quickly. Now this is just him this is
just the opening I've used,
and, I just wanna let let you listen
to what he had to say. Now this
is why Americans are outraged because there's IDF
members telling you we're committing war crimes. You
have a Green Beret who are now they're
now being, like, ridiculed by Piers Morgan and
people he invites on to shout down at
him about what he literally witnessed of them
murdering children or the World Food Programme telling
you we watch them murder kids and people
in front of us. But, yeah, you're all
lying racists.
Here's one of them in the IDF telling
you that's what they did. So keep that
in mind when Americans get outraged enough to
do things, even commit crimes. Not rationalizing,
understanding.
Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality
he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
Listen to the whole thing, unarmed are being
shot.
Right? Well, not there's no innocent, just unarmed,
which means we kill them all. That's the
point, guys.
Every day, we have ex not just examples
and evidence and and videos, but of these
people screaming that in the Knesset Of IDF
members doing videos and laughing about how it's
happening. Or doing videos of how they execute
people and then smoking a cigarette and doing
a thumbs up. It's everywhere, guys. It's everywhere.
And my point is that every institution of
any standing has been clear about that. And
yet, we just get lied to by our
government because, well, you can fill in the
blank. Obvious they're not acting in American interest,
guys. I think that's pretty clear. Now this
is Zionism's observer excuse me. Zionism observer,
and I find this to be very relevant
to this conversation and also about the overlap
here. This is an advertisement to recruit US
mercenaries for the g the the Gaza health
found
you know, the the execute the the Hunger
Games killing line
pretending to be a food line
in Gaza
about US UG Solutions LLC.
My point in this is to show you
that, like, they're actively recruiting
Americans to take part in this genocide, And
there's we have every single right to be
outraged about that, that our government allows it,
that there obviously is a problem in how
this is all working, and it's not just
advertisements, guys.
Now I just thought there's an interesting overlap.
Michael Rapaport, you know, that clown who still
exists.
But it's funny because, you know, as we
talked about before, there was the time when
he was getting shows canceled. He was acting
like, you know, it's only making me more
popular. Doesn't seem to be working out that
way. My point is that this is what
they keep doing and framing it this way.
Now what do you think? Do you think
people are well, there's two possibles here in
my mind.
Well, first, he says, my show tonight
at Stardom in Alabama was canceled.
I did not cancel. I would never cancel,
especially since I'm already here in Birmingham ready
to perform. It was shut down because protests
and threats to my support of Israel are
speaking up about the hostages. It's embarrassing and
sad.
Point.
You go on and look at his account
when people are fit. The he's framing this
as antisemitism.
That's how this conversation is spinning out. So
what do you think? Do you think this
is because, one, Michael Rapoport is not funny
and nobody people decided they don't want him
there anymore because he's you know, I we
could go on and on and on,
or do you think this is because
people are mad about him supporting a genocide?
Third, do you think it's because they go,
you are you, and we hate that. But
we set it up first. We organized it.
We planned it. We sold tickets. But then
went, wait a minute. I didn't even know
despite you folding that in with everything you
are today, but never doing that before this
all started. I mean, it's just it's guys,
the point is obvious.
Americans everywhere
are outraged about this genocide, outraged about The
US involvement in this genocide, outraged about
clowns like this telling you you're wrong for
not supporting this genocide. So people went up
and said, we don't want him here, and
they canceled it. And all he can do
is act like people hate Jews, and that's
why I suck at my job. No. You
just suck at your job. And people don't
like you because you're acting like an like
like some kind of a child who's, you
know I mean, there's so he's acting like
somebody who is gaining every day by watching
what's happening. Right? By watching shield and starve
to death, by watching people get murdered,
and acting like this is some kind of
a positive shift in the world. It's sickening
to me. So too with a lot of
Americans.
That's the reality to me. But this is
the best they can do. Right? Make it
all about religion and racism because
Zionism has lost control of the narrative.
My point though is just about trying to
frame everything like that, when in reality, it's
mostly about the fact that you're committing genocide
or supporting it, like the IDF member. Now,
two quick points I wanna include since we're
gonna get into more of, Gaza and Israel
in in the in one of the next
shows.
Daylight drop site news reported this. Now, this
has to do with the starvation. Now, you
guys, I bet you 99% of people here
are already well aware that Gaza is being
starved to death. Why? Because literally every possible
standing position is telling you that, and all
the evidence is showing you that.
I mean, every single thing in this conversation
other than Israeli propagandists and government that are
controlled by them are literally proving that to
you.
But it's being denied still by people in,
you know, the governments we're talking about. But
DropSiteNews came out and made a very clear
report on this, and this is via channel
thirteen.
Israeli media leaked Israeli records.
See, this keeps happening, by the way, that
Israeli media will literally prove to you what
we're telling you, and your own government acts
like it's not true and calls you racist.
Guess what? You're anti semite for reporting what
Israeli media is telling you the Israeli government
is doing.
Israeli
leaked Israeli records show government pursued
starvation strategy to force Hamas surrender. You know
this, though. Why? Because if you pay attention,
even remotely, Ben Gavira said it 13 times.
Smotrich has made it very clear right up
to this day that they're starving them because
they don't we don't wanna help the terrorists.
Well, that means you're starving them, first of
all, which is a crime as well as
the fact that all the people that are
innocent as well as all the people that
are your hostages, or rather understanding that we're
you know, that's just the way they would
frame that. The point
is that this is a major provable story
that is now even further flushed out to
whereas Redly Media has put out records that
show you that they planned to starve them
to death, and yet we're still being lied
to. Channel thirteen has published internal Israeli document
transcripts
from March,
revealing that Israeli Israel's war cabinet knowingly restricted
all aid
that they claimed would break Hamas.
Now whether you think that's even the reason
they did it, the point is that it's
not secret. Remember right in the beginning? No
food, no water, no fuel, and yet we
just pretend, or rather the government pretends that
we don't all see that,
which shows you who's driving the bus, guys.
So you can watch this further. I recommend
you read it and listen to it. My
point is just so you understand, which we'll
go into more depth soon, that they know
we see it, and they still do it
anyway.
This same point, this is the woman we
just ridiculed
all over. She's the one that went on
an interview on CNN
just yesterday in our show
and just
rattled off. I mean, the level of beheaded
babies, the level of, like, just I mean,
either she is
embarrassingly uninformed or she is lying on purpose.
That's the only two things I can make
sense in this, and it's horrifying. Even the
guy on CNN was, like, taken aback. Like,
are you serious right now? Are you actually
arguing that no one's and the point is
that she said something that just I thought
was out.
All of it was absurd.
She made the she claimed that she's been
in Gaza and seen all the locations where
they're using hospitals as human shields.
Oh, you mean even though journalists can't do
that?
I mean, how embarrassing. But see, they don't
think people are this smart, but they are,
and we're seeing you. But here's on on
Piers Morgan. Israeli hostage negotiator, Kershawn Baskin,
told Piers Morgan
that his government is committing war crimes in
Gaza, and Hamas told him twice in writing
that they will release the hostages and a
commitment to end the war in August.
How many more things do we need to
see? This is a guy who literally works
for Israel who's telling you that, and yet
this American woman is trying to lie to
you about what she was told to lie
about. It is just embarrassing to watch right
now. So the real question continues to be,
what is gonna be the breaking point here?
Right? What what will stop the government, who
knows you see they're lying to you, from
lying?
That that's gonna take action on our part,
isn't it? It's gonna take us doing something.
Now I'm never advocating for violence, but it's
pretty obvious that they look around, as I've
said many times before,
and they go, okay. Well, they're yelling at
us, but they're not doing anything. So if
we just don't respond now Epstein was a
little different. I think they were pretty that
got some momentum.
But I think they just begin to recognize
if we just do nothing, it will drift
away,
and they think you know, they everyone in
this country has been trained to look to
somebody else to solve their problems,
And that's where there that's how this is
right now. But here's another example.
Every which way you have evidence showing you
this. Were born here. My wife was born
here. I am not anti Israel,
but my government is pleading war crimes in
Gaza. And the arguments that were presented by
Brooke
belong in the garbage bin of history.
That's her. I mean and she and she's
doing this
humiliation ritual by going on these shows, and
and she just you know, literally, the level
of going beheaded babies.
And, you know, and all the different arguments
that were made there, you know, I mean,
from I mean, I can go down the
list of, you know, the calendar and the
and the fake. See, Rom. The point is
that that's the level of the narrative she's
giving. And anyone with even the smallest amount
of insight, even on places like CNN, are
like, come on. You know? Like, we've evolved,
like, an entire year beyond those fake claims,
and now they have new fake claims, but
she's back there in the beginning. And I
think that's just wild, but somebody's putting her
to it, guys, clearly. She's making the rounds.
It's an intellectual
insult, the kind of things that we
heard here that
insinuate that there's no such thing as a
Palestinian people. When there are 7,000,000 Palestinians living
between the river and the sea, how can
you deny the existence of a people? 7,000,000
people who call themselves, excuse me, let me
talk.
What Israel is doing
should not be tolerated by the Israeli public
nor by anyone in the entire world. This
war has to end.
Mustafa Baruti was a 100% right that Hamas
has given in writing, in English, and in
Arabic. I received from them in August
a commitment to end the war and return
all the hostages, and then there was more
than a 100 hostages that they were holding.
But they demand an end to the war.
They demand that Israel withdraw from Gaza. They
demand a release of Palestinian prisoners, and they
demand that humanitarian
aid go into Gaza. They also added in
writing, twice I've received from them, in Arabic,
that Hamas will not govern Gaza. Now the
big Right.
And guess what? You know all this because
you watch this show. And plenty of others
in the IMA and and other, you know,
independent media that actually care about the truth.
Think about that, though. You you knew this
if you watched us from for the first
week of this conversation, at least some parts
of that. You know, the reality of the
lies about what Gaza is, the lies about
the occupation, the lies in regard to it
still is. Right? I mean, it's just you
know this. Which I mean, it's yeah. Yeah.
We're demonstrating our value as usual. Right? The
fact that you were very immersed in this
well before they started you know, I'm glad
though. People like this are finding the courage
to get out there, not him necessarily. He's
I think I believe he's been screaming this
the whole time. But plenty of others out
there that are finally starting to point to
this stuff. You know? I mean, like I
said, even actually, I'll wait to get to
that about the aid. I like, we saw
Kevin Sorbo going like, what? I can't believe
you're demanding that they have to support Israel
to get aid. It's just going like, gosh.
How is this stuff not known by everybody?
Because of the world we live in, you
know, algorithmically controlled at this point.
So here,
a few examples of
our the US government, if you can call
it that, continuing to be occupied by a
foreign power. Here's Randy Fine, who's just one
of the most extreme examples in all this.
Oh, but guess what? He's in Israel. You
know? Like, all of them continue to go
to Israel. Why does that make sense to
anybody?
Is there a reason? I mean, that seems
to happen every other week at this point.
Does somebody like, groups of people are traveling
to Israel.
It doesn't make much sense
other than the fact that there's overwhelming,
undue, or rather just unnecessary
influence from one entity in the world over
this government, that they feel that every one
of them has to go and pay homage
to this group no matter what.
In honor, he says, to meet Smotrich,
this guy.
Oh, sorry. We'll go back in a second.
This one here. Smotrich.
He said this and many other examples that
that's what I was just pointing to, Might
be, quote, justified and moral to cause two
million Gazans to die of hunger, but the
world won't let us. But, yeah, let's continue
to stress that they're totally not doing what
he said we want to do or they
told you they were doing. That's Smotrich. He's
one of the most radical maniacs in this
government even according to the Israeli public.
Here he is meeting him proudly
today to talk about our mutual fight to
save western civilization.
And by that, he means destroying western civilization
so the Israeli government can rule the world.
That's what these radical religious Zionists believe.
And this is just funny to me. This
guy's been doing these all day, apparently. He
all these people left and right with these
Israeli cheerleading outfits on. It's perfect. It's exactly
what's going on.
Here's Randy Fine
on,
what is it?
Corporate media.
Say and and he literally, just like I
said, just rattles off the lies. I he
just I said, this vile person is still
openly lying about who who killed whom on
October 7
and even about the total. They're still citing
1,200 people. That was removed that was walked
back early
to 1,100 something, then even further. And the
point is now we understand anyone paying attention,
the link is for it right there, the
Hannibal directive.
There's been, like, six people within their government
who have openly admitted that that was ordered
and carried out. Not just that it looked
like it, but that's what they ordered. And
still to this point, it's being carried out.
And he wants you to believe that's just
not true. He also cheers on the starvation
of innocent, not in his eyes, as he
repeatedly states, innocent children, and even the Israeli
hostages that he claims to care about. But
keep starving them because we can't help the
people that will suffer because we're hurting the
bad guy the way they see it. Like,
think about the logic. We can't give food
to the enemy. Okay. Fine. What about the
people that you have there? How long until
food runs out and they die?
We can't fund the enemy.
Do you not care about the hostages?
Release the hostages. It's like, what? Like, it's
just it's just game. It's it's it's becoming
you know, I can't think of a better
word. It's just becoming so obvious.
Released to hostages? Well, what about the 15
times they've already tried to do that? Well,
you're a racist. You know? It's just it's
falling flat right now, and it has been
for a long time. Daniel McAdams says this
this is what he's referring to. This is,
Sarah Huckabee Sanders. It was great to meet
with Smotrich
and discuss the ways we can increase trade
and investment
in Israel.
Okay.
Daniel says, this sick anti Christian Huckabee family
showing their true colors.
Very interesting.
Here's ambassador Mike Huckabee, who also was just
there,
saying, heck, I thought you came to see
your dad. Which which was it, Huckabee?
What does that mean? Is that supposed to
be an undermining point? You know? And this
is Netanyahu.
Prime minister Netanyahu met this morning within his
Jerusalem office with governor Arkansas, governor Huckabee.
Why is a governor going there? Why are
anybody go why are any of them going
there repeatedly over and over? I think you
already get the point, guys. I think everybody
everywhere is starting to get the point.
Felacy says you both went to see your
daddy.
Just that's so very weird. They're, like, laughing
about the fact that they're all going over
to pay homage to the foreign government.
Madia Benjamin says, why aren't these Republican members
of congress at at home in their districts
taking care of their constituents
instead of being in Israel?
America first or Israel first. Everybody's seeing it.
And these are underling, young, up you know,
whatever people. I I don't I'm a I
don't think every one of them in congress
if I can just by eyeballing it, but
I think
the idea that you got these tours where
they just bring all these young politicians, and
they learn real quick what they're supposed to
do, what will get them to the top.
Now this,
I think, is just shocking,
and it speaks for itself. Tammy Bruce
telling you that she's not gonna speak about
the opinions of the government,
you know, by the way, which is actually
her job.
Was
in,
the West Bank, which he referred to as
Judea and Samaria, and said that it right
In case you guys didn't see, I should
the I I touched on it yesterday.
Mike Johnson
and, you know, every other person in congress,
you know, their their the point was Mike
Johnson went to, you know, pray at the
Wailing Wall as even,
George Galloway called out the weirdness of that
versus one of the most holy sites for
Christians right down the street. Doesn't make any
sense other than doing it for Israel.
My point
I mean, or I shouldn't say it like
that. There's other you know, you could say
because you think it's important to them and
you wanna be respectful. But the point is
that to see all of them do it
like some kind of a a ritual is
very weird. And so he went there.
Then Mike Johnson went to West Bank, which
I told you yesterday. And he was taking
pictures of West Bank like that's not illegal
occupation according to literally everybody. Not just Gaza,
but West Bank is illegal annexation of territory
according to every single even Mike Pompeo
when only as far as saying it's not
inconsistent with the law and then they went
right back under Biden and they still have
that standing policy that these are illegal. But
let's not forget that Trump already made a
deal with Adelson to do just that, and
they are, and are rapidly annexing all the
West Bank and kicking people out of their
homes. So Mike Johnson went there, not only
calling it Judea And Samaria, which is not
what they're called. That's what Israel calls them,
but saying that these this land belongs to
the Jewish people.
The Jewish people. Not the Israelis, but the
Jewish people, which makes no sense. Does it
belong to the Ethiopian Jews that Israel treats
like they're criminals and not and second tier
citizens? No. Not those Jews. What about the
Jews during World War two that Israel that
the Zionist organization didn't want to be part
of Israel because they thought they were weak
and they told them they should die over
there? No. Not those ones. Clearly, it's about
Zionism, guys, and it's not it's about control.
The point, though, is that he's you either
he's played by it or he's doing this
for the the agenda. The way she responds
to this is mind blowing because it's not
only illegal what he's doing.
It also sets a very clear policy
that they're okay with illegal annexation of territory.
So next time you claim somebody else is
doing that, you better be allowing it, right,
if they're in the same logic. But the
way he responds, I think, is is good.
Belongs to the Jewish people. Is that official
US, which you refer to as Judea and
Samaria
and said that it rightfully belongs to the
Jewish people? Is that official US policy? And
if it's not, what is US policy towards
Basic basic question.
Well,
I,
have said this about other diplomats who've spoken
their minds, including ambassador Huckabee.
Certainly,
that's
not
Get there. If there's a policy in that
regard, you would hear it from me.
So I think I can I can say
that? I'm not gonna speak for him
Okay. Or characterize his words in any certain
ways, but, clearly, that is his opinion.
But it's not the opinion of the US
government? Well, I'm not going to speak about,
the opinion of the government and if there's
a policy regarding Again, that's a job, by
the way.
The status in, any region of the world,
certainly in The Middle East,
I would, wait to hear it from secretary
Rubio and president Trump. Alright.
How embarrassing. Right. You mean Trump that's currently
allowing that and made a deal with Mary
Ann Adelson to to literally allow that?
They're just cowards, guys. Tammy Bruce is actually
just, you know, you know, they're I they're
they're all ridiculous to me. I just think
she's just clumsy about it, but so too
are they, all of them. Like and that's
what I said, by the way. Let me
grab this for
you,
just so you guys can see the the
case you haven't seen it before. That keeps
happening with this, by the way. I hate
these things. Mary Madelson and the Harrat's article
about her basically making a deal, oh, dang
it, with Trump.
I absolutely hate these things. There we go.
Trump is desperate for Miriam Miriam Adelson's cash.
Her condition, Westbank annexation.
Very, very, very public. It's not a secret,
and they're doing that now. So I said,
so who exactly will speak about the opinion
of the government, Tammy? That's what you're supposed
to do. I said, you might just be
worse than KJP,
which funny enough people somehow took as
not, like, not as bad. Like, my point
was clear. They're all ridiculous. Like, you the
point was just to say because KJP was
just, like, a special kind of stupid in
this conversation or just really bad at the
job.
She the way she conducts these things, it's
just I I honestly think it's not that
she's as bad as some of the worst
people we've seen, but just that she's been
put all of them and put in a
position
that's near impossible to defend, if not impossible.
And they do it anyway because their job
is to blindly support Trump or whoever's in
power no matter what, regardless of your principles,
regardless of integrity. That's where we are.
James Lee had an interesting clip that I
wanted to share this in this part of
the show, which which is about somebody running
for congress.
I I just
to me, I think this is a sign
of, like, a dying thing. Like, this
whole thing, the way it's all working. I
mean, like, the structure with APAC and lobbying
and you know, this country is shockingly aware
of this now.
And so what you're seeing, I think, is,
like, the over the top, like, effort to
try to just jam this back in, and
I don't think it's gonna work. But the
way he covered this is perfectly, like,
sigh like like, sarcastic. You'll see what I
mean. Never ever endorsed anybody for president, for
congress, for senate, for whatever.
But today, I am here to announce my
full throated support for Nick for Israel for
US Congress. Because I agree with him, America
is facing an existential problem that only 80%
of Congress is funded by AIPAC, which means
that 20% of them are antisemitic.
Guys, that's actually posted on his site for
his campaign.
Underlined.
That 20% that aren't founded by APAC are
antisemitic, which all that means is they're in
a backward way proving to you that APAC
is going after every politician,
everyone they can to influence their opinion. How
long and that's not even technically, lobbying outside
of the the way they do this for
many reasons is not even really lobbying, in
my opinion. It's bribery, but that's what lobbying
is. The point is that what they've done
is turn this into an, like, every moment,
all the time, funding or pulling influence when
they decide, and they're dictating policy. It's very
clear. Remember remember that APAC was supposed to
be registered for an agent, and JFK wanted
that to happen, and then he died. That's
I'm not even implying it's the only thing
involved in that conversation, but it's clearly one
that matters.
On his website, how can you argue people
that just don't take funding from that group
are somehow racist?
That's called desperation to me. Can you see
this chart? The blue, politicians bought by AIPAC.
This is good.
Red, antisemitic.
Not good. We need people that are gonna
fight for common sense policies,
patriotic Israel first policies for America
in congress. K? Policy Guys, just so you
know, like, for the podcast, that's actually what
that says. Nick for Israel and that's his
name, by the way. Forgive I forget you're
not all seeing this. Nick for Israel.
That's what his name is.
Or that's the way he's framing it. It
says it says Nick for Israel, for US
Congress, is committed
to governing not just for those who voted
for him, but for all
Israelis.
My patriotic Israel first platform for America is
built on the following common sense policies.
Patriotic Israel first platform.
That's crazy. For America
in congress.
K? Policies like granting Israel three senate seats.
Yes. Absolutely.
Provide tax credits to companies that move operations
to settlements in the West Bank. Establish Benjamin
Netanyahu's birthday as a federal holiday. Yes. God
bless that man. This next one's huge for
the veterans. Allow IDF veterans to board commercial
flights before US veterans. Declare Tel Aviv, the
capital of California, Oregon, and both Dakotas. And
as a California resident, I am a 100%
on board with this. And finally, one that
we've been fighting for for a long time,
Medicare for all Israelis.
Yes. Healthcare is a human right for Israelis.
If you wanna donate, you can go to
Nick for Israel for congress dot US. But
if you're a little short on cash, no
worries. Simply like and share this message. If
you, like Nick, believe that America is all
about faith, it's about freedom, and it's about
Israel.
Yeah. So just so you know, my point
is that this could very well be something
that was organized in a way to be
a criticism. You know, my point is just
to to to to
highlight this overlap with congress and what they're
doing. Right? So he even added that background,
like
music, history. Very clear he's trying to make
a point that he doesn't mean what he's
saying. But my point is that these people
in congress that you can very clearly see,
like, on the surface, advocating for Israel
is it's the it's exactly what the point
the point that he's making here. It's obvious
that what they're doing
is not America first, arguing that what we
need you know, every possible way. I mean,
the core, the crux of it is that
we they're telling you you can't say things
if it's about this country.
Always shows you the obvious. You can criticize
The US. You can be racist against anything
except Israel, even though that's not really what
most people are doing. I just think that's,
oh, ridiculous to me. Just over the top.
Now this is interesting in the continuation of
this.
We talked about this yesterday. Now Glenn Greenwald
called this out. This is about the Times
of Israel article
that essentially argues that the Epstein files were
used against Trump to put him back in
his place.
Seems very interesting to me,
which you remember watch yesterday's show if you
wanna read through it. Trump, Israel, and the
Epstein files. It says just to start. It
says, the Trump and his administration criticized Netanyahu
and Israel, and now the Epstein files are
haunting him.
And they go on to make a very
clear case about, well, he did this and
did that. I don't think that's even accurate.
I don't think they're even at odds. But
what's interesting is if they are, this would
the the the the use of these as
a coercive tool would say two things, that
he is on the list, and that's how
they use it to control him, which wouldn't
be that hard to wrap your mind around
with what's going on in the world today.
But I just wanted to reiterate that. That's
very interesting to me. You know, the the
it's being put out there by Israel by
the times of Israel, no less. And Glenn
says a Times of Israel blogger strongly suggests
now, like I said, the same thing I
reported it as, it's not stating that as
a fact or even saying they're controlled by
the files.
But it is clearly, like, that's what he's
suggesting with like, right on the surface. But
there are others that are reporting this as
Israel says they control their you know, like,
that kind of way. That's typical mainstream alternative
media. One says,
suggest, then and then threatens that leaks about
Trump's involvement with Epstein are Israel's punishment for
Trump's refusal to bomb Iran
more. He warns it really doesn't pay to
start up with Israel.
I mean, it's wild to me. Now here's
what's crazy.
He literally cites exactly what is happening there.
Not even an opinion to it. Right?
Or,
yeah. Not even an opinion. He just literally
cites the context.
This person says, oh my god. Shut the
f up. You're antisemitic.
And Blanche says, anyone who cites articles from
Israeli newspapers is racist.
That's that this is my larger like, what
I was saying earlier. Like, that is
unhinged or your narrative isn't working anymore.
Now Glenn Greenwald also points this out about
Trump and DEI. Well, we keep hearing a
lot about that. Right?
Well, it's not really going away, at least
not, you know, in the context of
what would be the right way to frame
that? Like, so like like, with woke and
manipulation, you know, or the pronouns and woke
censorship,
well, that still exists, but it's just more
fine tuned to just one kind of hate
speech, but it's still there. So my point,
it was never really about the actual,
you know, whether it was about Jews or
or Christians or whatever. It was about being
able to apply that for that for however
the you know, using
control over speech for an outcome. Maybe just
for Israel. I don't know. But so my
point is that on DEI in the same
way, it's the same kind of evolution. He
said and this is from Forward,
which he said he, cites as one of
the most pro Israel Jewish outlets in America,
how Trump is banning DEI at universities except
for Jews.
That's the title. How Trump is banning DEI
at universities except for Jews. It says the
Trump administration ban on DEI universities has one
big exception, Jewish students get special support. And
the article's
going praise. Great.
Not not racist or discriminatory or one-sided. It
would be if it was Muslims. Sure. But
just Jews? No. That's that's what should happen.
I find that to be wild. Now, obviously,
let's not forget the way that this kind
of thing is used to drive people to
actually have hatred towards an entire religion, many
of which don't believe in Zionism
or that this should even make sense. But
that and then then that gets pointed to
as why they need Zionism needs to exist.
It is you know? Look. Glenn's talked about
this. Dan Cohen's talked about this. It's important
to listen to people who have the courage,
especially when they're Jewish, to call out
what this is.
And he says, not only is Trump not
banning DEI for Jewish students, but he's aggressively
expanding them and forcing colleges to adopt them,
you know, or removing funding, and that's totally
about that's totally free speech or, you know,
compliant or, you know, the idea is that
you're using these tools to coercively change what
people are doing and saying. There's no way
else around that.
Glenn Greenwald also points out, just making the
point, and he says he sees you know,
I thought I actually continue to find it
really fascinating that someone like Glenn
is right right here with us. Right? And
I think it's not it's not that doesn't
change that I you know, I regardless of
whoever was around it, you know I still
believe this, and I'll stand by what I
believe is right regardless of how unpopular it
is. But I find it really interesting that
people at at his level
are now, like, you're occupied by Israel. I
just think that's so crazy to see that
we got here finally, the awareness of what's
really happening.
Members of congress spend their recess in their
home district, he says. And then site shows
an
a a a caption of Israel prime of
excuse me. Can't talk right now. He, quote,
tweets
the prime minister of Israel account that says
prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
met yesterday evening with an APAC organized delegation
of Republican members of Congress.
Yeah. And so he frames it as members
of congress spend the recess at their home
district. There's really no way to misunderstand that.
Ian Carroll, who has been really quiet lately,
not that that has to mean anything. I
just thought that was interesting. He was, you
know, prolific out there. And if you look
at his this is one of the only
a few things he said in August or
just, like, over the last couple of days.
But he comes out and,
captions Tom Emmer, who says, this week, I
have the honor of leading the delegation at
APAC
everywhere you look.
Ian Carroll says, our whole congress takes a
recess to avoid voting on the Epstein files,
release, and instead go and kiss the wall
and
say hi to BB. He says something much
grosser than that. But you're antisemitic for noticing
treason.
I mean, the Epstein files, I mean, all
the things around, the lies that built up
to it. I don't know how we can
deny what we're watching.
And I'll include these as always, just the
different clips of Donald Trump
telling you what we're discussing today, and I'll
play this one quickly since I felt it
was important to reiterate because we probably haven't
listened to it in a while. No. The
biggest change I've seen in congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
You know?
And that's the sec it basically reiterates it
a different way. I just for time, just
to always cut that. The point is he
goes on to say the same thing. Let
me just place it and start it. Whoops.
Was the most powerful
lobby
in the country Still is. Fifteen years ago.
Today, between Tlaib and AOC and all of
these people, what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. You'll give it to them. Yeah.
I have the I'm good.
Very weird.
So yes. Right? They should control congress like
they once did is what he said very
clearly. And as always, we on the show,
we went through the the full conversation. It's
not taken out of context.
Can't do it every single time. The point
is it's very clear what he said. I
don't know how you deny that with what's
going on in the world today.
So let's bring this into another conversation that
I think over that does overlap with this
in a very interesting way. Now as I
said before,
I'm gonna go through this somewhat quickly. You
know, we're I I plan on doing much
deeper overviews of this once this develops more,
but I do think this is important to
highlight now.
And especially the way this came about. Okay.
So this was, a tweet or truth social,
whatever it's called. Donald Trump says crime in
Washington DC is totally out of control. Local
youths and gang members,
some only 14, 15, and 16 years old,
are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent
citizens at the same time knowing that they
will be almost immediately released. Now I don't
know if the whole point is that supposed
to be something about Democrats. It's clear that
this is you know, Washington, DC is not
just Democrats, but the point is
there's there if that's happening anywhere, obviously, that's
a problem.
But why just about Washington DC? Clearly, there's
things like this all over the country. And
I you could argue it's about Democrats if
that, you know, makes more sense to you.
I don't think it's unique to Democrat places
alone,
but it's odd that it's on DC, which
we're going with somewhere with this. But so
the interesting point though is first, he says,
they're not afraid of the law enforcement because
they know nothing ever happens to them. Are
aren't you the current administration? Doesn't that matter?
You know, this and this. This feels like
a cut against something Democrat related, or is
he just calling out? Who's he calling out?
Does he it just it seems strange. But
he says,
but it's going to happen now.
That something's gonna happen to them, he says.
The law in DC must be changed,
okay, to prosecute these minors as adults and
lock them up for a long time starting
at age 14. That's a strange statement.
So
now you're gonna start law arresting children because
they do I mean, look. It's a crime.
Right? There and there are there's clear,
leeway is not the right word. There's a
word for it that even makes more sense
in a court of law, but there there
is leeway given to judges to make decisions
like this, where they can charge you as
as an adult, or even the lawyers can
put that forward. The idea that he's trying
to change the law to go after people
that, you know, as a broad discussion because
this happened in one context they're trying to
make a big story about, which it should.
There it was crime. People that people should
be arrested.
But that's a weird way to go with
it. Now how do you how much you
wanna bet that gets turned into, you you
know, the whole ADL, the young generation is
the biggest problem. They all see through Israel.
Like, become something where you go after people,
even children who are I mean, that's one
overlap, or you could make it about the
current political situation. You could make it about
Epstein. The point is you're now going after
children or you you're opening the door to
that, the conversation of arresting 14 year olds
because they break the law.
If they break the law, charge them for
the crime. Or if it's something so severe,
you already have the opening to make that
the case. This feels very weird to me.
There's a lot of ways you can go
with that, but I think that's not the
point today, but that just seems really strange.
And he says the most recent victim was
beaten mercilessly by local thugs.
Weirdly enough, they're talking about that big balls
guy from Doge. We'll get into that in
a second. It says Washington DC must be
safe, clean, and beautiful for all Americans. Now
the point is that's what triggered this post.
What happened to him? What a coincidence.
Importantly, and this is for the world to
see. If DC doesn't get its act together
and quickly,
we will have no choice
but to take federal control of the city
and run this city how it should be
run and put criminals on notice that they're
not going to get away with it anymore.
Perhaps it should have been done a long
time ago. Then this incredible young man
and so many others, he didn't even mention
it, which is strange. So that you didn't
even make it clear you're talking about, but
now it's clear he's talking about that one
guy, which we'll show you in a second.
Where was I?
Young man and so many others would not
have had to go through the horrors of
violent crime. Okay. So you're telling me that
if you controlled the area that there just
simply wouldn't? That that can happen anywhere, and
it does happen anywhere.
People commit crimes all over the place in
some of the safest cities in the world.
So this is as usual, taking advantage of
this to achieve something, which anybody being honest
with themselves with what we've seen well before
even this administration
knows that they if they they're not trying
to solve this problem. They're trying to use
this problem to begin something new. And that's
what we like Bruce Feing just said in
our last podcast with on on fine points.
The the this every single member of government,
every single and this is he's been in
this government. He was in the Reagan administration.
He's saying that there there is never a
a pure motive. That they always have an
ulterior motive.
Every time. Same thing here. I don't believe
that this matter. I mean, look at there's
plenty of the places where this might matter
more than just in this one location. Why
wouldn't they start there? I think it's about
this area for clear reasons we'll get into
next.
And he says, if this continues, I am
going to exert my powers
and federalize this city, make America great again.
Very strange thing to say. And Maj says,
except DC is already already is already is
federal, which there we'll get into the the
nuance here. It's interesting.
It was never a city. It's literally a
federally owned and controlled corporate charter situation. Yeah.
You you can decide if that's exactly the
accuracy.
But
Elon Musk says a few days ago, a
gang of about a dozen young men tried
to assault a woman in her car at
night in DC.
Yeah. That's there's police for that. That's a
crazy thing, and it shouldn't if it if
it's gonna continue to get out of control,
then there's people that could make decisions for
this local area. Now the question is whether
it should become like every other location in
regards to, like, a state. We'll talk about
that too. That's been called on for a
long time.
But it says a Doge team member saw
this was happening,
ran to defend her, and was severely beaten
to the point of concussion, but he saved
her.
Doesn't that just seem insane? Like, what are
the odds of this guy from Doge
happens to be there, and it becomes the
impetus for why they want to federalize Washington,
DC and turn it into maybe a freedom
city?
Maybe that's one direction it could go. Let's
talk about it.
Doge worker, big balls, that was his little,
you know, what do you call it? His
tag, whatever you call it, you know, his
what do you call that? It's just his
name, the name he used when he was
online.
Doge worker big balls bloodied after DC attack.
Trump must call to federalize DC.
Doesn't that just feel like a real really
sharp, you know, like,
very interesting.
But just I just wanna show you that
because that's that's you know, he was involved
in this. Now here is Alex Jones back
in February
highlighting this guy or rather the the discussion
about it. And it says, massive big balls
doge update because they all weirdly talked about
this thing for a minute. And it says
Trump sides with Musk and JD Vance to
bring big balls back into the doge fold.
Right. And now it just doesn't exist anymore.
Clearly, that's what it was all about. Right?
Saving money that didn't actually happen that way.
Actually, I forgot that,
I was gonna talk about this in another
show coming up, but I will show you
this real quick.
Oh, it is right here. I I forgot.
I did add it back. Doge overstated its
savings of its largest cuts by 97%.
We would, guys, we were we were all
I mean, those of us that called it
out weren't, but we most people were played
about what this was. I think that's shockingly
clear. Now the sup supposed leader of Doge,
who's really the leader of the digital services,
which is what it was before they turned
it into Doge, all they did was change
the name, I mean, Gleason is now presenting
tech health focused discussions about wearables and
because that's about cutting costs in the government?
No. It's about digital services because that's what
it really was. They used this, in my
opinion, to get what they wanted from what
was happening for AI or whatever it was.
Now Musk is moving on or, you know,
continuing his government agenda, but from a different
spot.
The point get back to this.
What was the whole point of this? Why
were they so adamant about getting this one
guy back in for something that didn't even
really pan out?
After he was doxxed by a USAID funded
journalist,
not even remotely, guys, it's so weird the
way that they covered this. But clearly, there
was something there. They made sure he was
back in, and then Doge randomly fizzled out,
and now he got beat up in DC.
And now he's being used as the impetus
to start a federalized city
or to federalize the city. Now here's an
interesting point to understand before we go forward
under just frequently asked questions about statehood in
DC. It says, what is Washington DC? Now
Now Washington DC isn't a state. It's a
district. It says DC stands for District Of
Columbia. Its creation comes directly from the US
constitution, which provides that that district, quote, not
exceeding 10 miles square would, quote, become the
seat of the government of the United States.
Now it says congress established the federal district
in 1790
to serve as a nation's capital. Now, like,
to the point of what Maj is saying,
you could argue very clearly this is not
even remotely what it is today
or really ever was. There's all sorts of
valid conversations to have about what places like
London and Washington DC represent in the global
conversation. Now that's we wish you should get
into that, look into it, but today, it'll
distract distract detract from the point we're making
about where this is going.
The point is to consider whether that it
it isn't remotely what this is today, and
this is just the narrative to use for
them to seize control of this for something
different or to turn it into some seat
of power for the technocrat,
you know,
administration that's coming.
But it says the constitution dictates that the
federal district be under the jurisdiction of the
US Congress. Okay. So here's an interesting point.
Regardless of whether we want that or we
think DC is something else, it's fascinating to
me that here we are with another point
in which the Trump administration is threatening to
violate the constitution.
The constitution dictates that it should be under
The US under control of US Congress. And
so he's gonna say we're gonna take control
of this. Now federal, you could argue, is
somehow he's talking about the executive branch. That's
what he's talking about.
And is in in that point, is he
even actually talking
about taking control of it and turning it
into some kind of a state? That doesn't
seem to be even remotely what they're talking
about. So to me, this seems like the
reality is as it was laid down, they
were supposed to sort of be the seat
of power that people that of congress and
how it ruled through that.
And that then changes the dynamics of how
that works in regard to legalities and but
you you would argue that if it's this
location central to the power seat of everything
in this country,
that they wouldn't just let it dwindle into
chaos and people would be beaten up and
arrested and drug rates through this roof and,
like, every bad thing. It seems strange.
Now it goes on to say, what do
residents of DC,
want? Do they want statehood or why? And
it says the people of Washington, DC deserve
the same rights that the people in the
other 50 states enjoy.
District
residents are required to fulfill all the obligations
of US citizenship, paying taxes, voting, and, you
know, all the stuff that we all hate.
Yet, for over two hundred years, we have
been denied, that's how they're framing it, a
voice in our national government
and sovereignty over our local affairs.
Right? So the point is the people there
are not represented
as something in, you know, like, so, California,
you know, it go for house and and
senate. You've got representation.
Right? So in this case, that's not really
how that works. It's sort of the central
location for this to be conducted. But the
argument,
which I don't even think this is really
what it's about, is that these people want
that. And so they want it to be
turned into a state of its own.
And it says, admitting admitting the residential and
commercial parts of DC as a state will
at least give us representation in congress and
control over our state and local government.
Interesting. Right? Now, that's just these are just
basic overviews. I think it's important to understand
that that most people don't think about. So
this comes to
the reason I'm talking about this today. I
saw this video.
This wasn't posted on posted on August 4.
This came out, I don't know, a month
ago or so. I saw this going around.
And what she's gonna tell you is that
she heard a rumor, which is obviously why
we didn't get into it because it's it's
very subjective. But with what's now happening, it's
starting to stand out even more. And guess
what that rumor is? That Donald Trump is
going to take over Washington DC and hand
it over to people like Peter Thiel.
So, obviously, I heard that. I'm like, well,
that's interesting, but I you know, a rumor.
But she makes the case that she heard
it from a bunch of independent different people
that didn't talk to each other, and it
seems to be circulating.
So, True Stream Media says, if sudden talk
of federalizing DC is just cover,
which is one of the things I'm considering,
to turn it into a freedom city, really
technocratic,
you know, hellscape is far from concern, proponents
of freedom cities beware.
Every group that has ever tried this in
history has failed.
From the Templars who were tortured into confessions
as an excuse to clear king Philip's massive
debt to them, to the cis Cistercian
monk
whose monasteries were dissolved under King Henry
the eighth rule and their,
properties and funds seized and divided up divvied
up. Excuse me. Anytime a group threatens to
live outside the established
government's rule, It's always short lived. Now you
that's a fair thing to say, but it
seems to suggest that that's something like people
breaking away
from Trump's or rather the US government's rule.
I see this differently. I see this as
being something that is happening within our government's
control. So the argument would be they wouldn't
want this wouldn't be something they would push
back. It'd be like California seceding and then
they're going after it. I you know, it's
a fair point to consider, but I I
think it's more about the transition of power
from their power structure. It says that she
goes on to say or they go on
to say, this is especially so under corrupt
governments,
and probably even more so for a corrupt
government in a crumbling late stage empire. That's
she's talking about the US government or US
empire.
Regardless of what those in current, current power
might promise you. It says without fundamental change,
the people running things will eventually come for
you. And when the pendulum swings again, it
will only be a matter of time whether
this admin or the next one or the
next. You'll go down with everybody else whether
or not you cave out carve out a
special city for yourself with different rules and
slap the word freedom on it in short
term. The only way America gets fixed is
to return to the foundational first principles. Now
I 100%
agree with that if we're forced to live
in a state of society. If we are
forced to live in this kind of society,
I completely agree with that. Now, I, however,
opt for a different path if that was
what people were open to hearing, which is
no government. And it's not some pipe dream
fantasy. There's valid things. We've talked about it
many times. But clearly,
I will I'll constantly keep bringing it up
as long as I do this, but clearly
people are not there. But incremental steps, guys.
We're getting there to the understanding of how
government works, it seems, in the world. But
everything else you try will fail, she says.
They say, and to think otherwise is either
ignorance or hubris.
So here's the clip, keeping this in mind,
where she's telling you what she heard in
Washington DC.
Politics, and I just got back from a
trip in Washington
I work in politics, and I just got
back from a trip in Washington DC. And
I wanna tell you the absolutely unhinged rumor
I heard from current and former federal workers
and people on Capitol Hill about what Donald
Trump is about to do next. Because if
it's true, it will alter the course of
American history forever. I wanna preface this by
saying I am not a journalist. What I'm
about to share with you is just a
rumor. Though I did hear it from multiple
people who do not know each other from
multiple areas of the federal government. So with
all those disclaimers, I'm gonna share this with
you anyway because I think you deserve to
know. Long story short, Donald Trump is trying
to give Washington DC to billionaire Peter Thiel.
I mean that literally, not figuratively. Like, he
is trying to give a billionaire
control over the land and the people within
Washington DC. The specific rumor is that instead
of granting Washington DC statehood like its residents
have been demanding for years, he wants to
actually roll back the little bit of independence
that they already have of self government. Apparently,
he's considering turning the district into what some
call a freedom city. Proponents of freedom cities
advocate for areas and territories that are governed
and owned completely by corporations.
So essentially corporate colonies.
So there's no federal government oversight. There's no
state government oversight. Essentially, these freedom cities are
ruled by CEO kings. So from what I'm
hearing, the Trump administration is exploring abusing DC's
existing status as a district to make it
the first freedom city and give it to
his billionaire buddy, Peter Thiel. This is a
disaster for reasons I shouldn't have to elaborate
on. Obviously, that would set an incredibly dangerous
precedent. It's hugely symbolic to give the area
where the federal government runs to a billionaire.
We're really talking about a new era of
colonization
rooted in techno fascism.
There it is. Not just a billionaire, but
a technocrat.
And while this particular rumor is new, Trump's
association with people who lobby for the creation
of freedom cities is well known, and they
were at his inauguration. I know it sounds
far fetched, but we really should start fighting
against this now before it becomes a reality.
Yep.
Yep. And that was, true stream media. Reshared
that and then added a point beneath it.
Oh, and by the way, so to add
to elaborate to what you're saying there. So
you could argue argue
that
there's two ways to look at it to
take what TrueStream Media was highlighting, which would
be that if this was just Trump, let's
say, or just like the Republican party who's
trying to carve out their own thing and
then other people come to power, I completely
agree with their point that that would likely
end up in them kicking them out and
taking it back or, you know, it would
change.
But if this is being done, let's say,
as the whole of government for the transition
of power to something else or by a
foreign power at the expense of The United
States, then you could see why that wouldn't
just swing back the other way when they're
completely in control of the direction. Right? I
mean, it's worth considering both. They go on
to say case in point, and this is
something we've talked about already. I'm telling you
guys, this is worth you know, demonstrating our
value for you today. Okay? Because we are
so far ahead of some of these stories.
I don't know even I know very few
people who had even talked about Prospera.
We talked we covered this in twenty twenty
four September. The technocratic regime change. Under the
guise of freedom, technocrats are slowly taking control.
Telling you, this is only gonna get more
obvious as this goes forward. And I I
mean, I we're seeing it. Okay? So my
point is Prospera in Honduras, I'll come back
to in a second, is Peter Thiel funded
technocratic, hellscape frame his libertarian city.
And it's I mean, that's what I'll I'll
go back to this. We'll come back to
this in a second. This is an article
we've already pointed to. The title is the
for profit city that might come crashing down.
Now that's this is evolving into not immediately
today. I think this was, I don't know,
I forgot where the date is, but I
think a couple months ago. The point is
about the idea that
because of the transition of power in Honduras,
now they're starting to get kicked out or
they're starting to lose control, and they don't
care. I'll come back to it in a
second. Now what Truth three Media says, case
in point, the freedom city, in quotes, I
would add, that started in 2021 in Honduras,
I'll add, after even illegal US regime change
in Honduras that it's easy to prove,
is already facing opposition from the latest government,
which began stripping away special privileges.
Remember, it's an autonomous zone, like, right out
of sustainable development goals. And that's supposed to
be what the conservatives support
and says it was granted under its predecessors.
Same as it ever was. Same wherever the
land is, you will deal with its government's
instability and corruption no matter what promises get
made to you in a short term or
what your contracts say. Now they're taking this,
I mean, from the idea that somehow that
Prospera is, like,
you know, whether they think it's good or
not, they're the ones being, like, lost in
this because they hope that the government will
maintain. I see it different. I see this
as ultimately as this is a trial balloon
for exactly what they're rolling out in other
places and maybe what she's saying might happen
in DC.
Very interesting, isn't it? Now, again, remember, I'm
gonna do this I'm gonna go over this
in-depth as this develops, but this is important.
Watch this show again. This is but what
this is all the the quick rundown, okay,
is that in twenty twenty one or four,
there was an illegal regime change carried out
in with support of the US government.
And that was and before that, they were
trying to do this, and they couldn't get
it to happen because the government wouldn't let
it. Then they do it carry out a
regime change, and then they're able to create
their autonomous zone on land that was part
of Honduras.
K. Then they couldn't get past what they
wanted for the special zone, and so they
removed people in the judge positions and put
other people in there. And then, boom, what
do you know? They voted in what they
wanted. Okay. So they finally got through corruption
and manipulation their autonomous zone in Honduras.
Then from that place forward, it's there's been
read these articles that she they're pointing to
and others about it. It is rife with
corruption. There's all sorts of problems in the
area. They're starting to absorb I think if
I remember correctly, I think it's called Crawfish
Rock. There's a place that they're absorbing.
Like, they're
literally, you know,
expanding out and taking more territory. You know,
that that there's a lot to get into.
The point is to come forward today that
they're highlighting True Street Media is pointing to
is
because of ship switching of power, which I
think is,
you know, likely it's because right now the
US government's clearly
stretched too thin. I don't think they're in
control of all the things that are happening.
They, you know, they're causing chaos and agendas
to spin out, but they I don't think
like, my point would be if they wanted
this and they were not overwhelmed with everything
else, they'd probably carry it another regime change
or probably have not lost in the first
place.
But people did other people got into power
in Honduras, and one of the first things
they talked about was they have to go.
We don't want Prospera here. They're violating the
law. They revoke the special,
the autonomous zone designation.
But guess what Prospera did? Nothing. They're still
there. They're saying we don't care. I mean,
it's not saying that, but you can clear
they're not acknowledging that they're being forced out
or trying to be.
And the leader of Honduras spoke up, I
played it for you, and said, the US
government is trying to commit another regime change.
I argued then it was because of this.
And the Prospero is probably aware
that once that regime change took place, they
wouldn't have to leave anyway. But so here
we are since then. This was last year,
and so they're still there. Honduras doesn't want
them there. People around them are saying we
this is not and, I mean, they're not
bound by the law of Honduras. They're not
bound by anything other than the CEO king
that runs it. And this is why Trump
even talks about the Freedom City point because
let it be run by a CEO. Isn't
that whatever America wants? No. Not really. Maybe
the kind of, as I've said earlier, the
gaggle of blind followers around any of these
politicians.
But the whole point is that in these
articles, they very clearly point to Prospera
as an example of the Freedom City direction,
All covered in this
show. So here's just one example of these
articles, and I think they might even mention
it in here.
Yeah. Right there. So first, what are Freedom
Cities? Billionaire CEO's plan could reshape
America.
03/12/2025.
It says the a coalition of campaign groups
opposed to regulation
has called for the creation of freedom cities,
in quotes, across The United States. And the
idea is backed by some of the most
high profile billionaires in The United States, including
Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen. What do you
know? The cities would be pockets of deregulated
areas with the aim of promoting innovation and
technological advancement. Kinda sounds like a different name
for a fifty minute city because it is.
I mean, that and and, again, if you
got sucked into the left right idea of
it all, it wasn't about the specific left
leaning elements of it. It was just about
control, guys. The fifty minute city is an
idea about an infra a technocratic controlled light.
That's exactly what this becomes.
Now here, it says another organization pushing for
cons this this concept
is Prospera.
Telling you guys, we were calling this out
back then, and we're gonna come back to
it more. But the point is they're supported
by
Thiel and Adresen. Both of them support Prosper.
It's a trial balloon, telling you guys. Now
let's not forget that Palantir,
Peter Thiel, has a strategic partnership with the
government committing genocide right now, And they're using
that AI tech they gave them to commit
that genocide, and that's the very AI surveillance
tech they're using on you in America in
The United States because Trump or US government,
but that was allowed his administration.
And that's the same concept, the same tech,
the same everything that will be applied to
this idea.
That should worry everybody. It's so as hell
worries me. Now here's a clip I think
is relevant to play again. The idea that
he very clearly says that he it's his
mind to defer to Israel.
So if you can if you are aware
of this kind of infiltration overlap to what
they're doing, or carp or the rest of
them, they will tell you that they blindly
side with Israel. Shouldn't that play a factor?
Whether it's about the Israeli Zionism agenda or
if it's just about the fact that that
government's gonna make a genocide
proudly,
shouldn't that matter that these people are the
ones that are building cities are claiming it's
gonna be the future of this country, whether
or not that's DC? You're damn right it
should. Do you think about the use of
artificial intelligence
or lavender
via the IDF in
identifying
Hamas targets?
And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk
about that the population decline is a risk
for humanity?
Look. I yeah. I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without
without,
going into all the deep you know,
I'm not on top of all the details
of what's going on in Israel because my
my bias is to defer to Israel. It's
it's it's not for us to to second
guess every, everything. And, I I believe that,
broadly, the IDF
gets to decide,
what it wants to do and that they're
broadly in the right. And that's that's sort
of the the perspective I come back to.
And if I if I fall into the
trap of,
arguing you on every detailed point, I'm I'm
actually gonna I would actually be conceding
the the the broader issue that, The Middle
East should be micromanaged from Cambridge. And I
think Or yeah. Or maybe back to the
question about whether or not your AI tech
should be used to kill children, but let's
make it about about political consideration about governments.
My god. I mean, it's the same thing
we see in politics, but he's very, very
clumsy at it. That's
just simply absurd.
And so I'm not I'm not gonna concede
that point.
And what was your the other
Just insane. Now
to to the end of this segment point
this point is that to go back to
that thing I said before,
Doge overstating its
you know? And this but to be clear
about this, it's about the largest cuts they
claimed. Right? So, like, the top five combined
of the largest cuts they claimed they made,
you you add them up and it turns
out it was like and you go I'll
I'll play the clip in a coming up
show. It was something like
$8,000,000,000
and it turned out to be a 135,000,000
that was actually saved. Just like a 97%
lie is what it was. Now my point
in even highlighting this is the idea that,
you know, this is about Doge. And what
was Doge? Was it about government cuts? Well,
I mean, either if that's the case, then
they spectacularly failed or they didn't even try.
And now we see bigger government, more spending.
So pretty clear that wasn't really what it
was about.
So I think it's obvious with the way
they're going and what they're telling you with
now no regulation because of executive order that
the AI direction was always the plan.
And this is just the show on the
eighth of, this is oh, it's in 2025
in in March. The impending future of AI
government, but who will control the AI?
So, Doge, I believe that was what it
was about, at least in large part. Maybe
Maybe we'll find out more in the future.
The point though is they clearly scraped up
all the data they could get, allowed Israel
access to all of it. That's very real.
And now
Doge just kind of vanished, except for Big
Balls, who's now helping them, you know, federalize
the DC area or turn it into a
Freedom City. Very strange. But I think that's
what it's really about. And I'm only showing
this for the point that this
overall
like, not just this point, not not this,
thing I'm showing you, but this direction.
It's very clear to me that where that
all comes together
with Technocracy,
Peter Thiel, Palantir, Israel. I mean, it's all
clearly, there's an intersection right around America, right
around your rights and your direction.
I mean, that has to matter to Americans
more than anything.
Not we we are we choosing our direction
right now?
We're really worth asking. And so the AI
point of it comes in very clearly with
the Prospera element, the technocratic element, the surveillance
element, the genocide committing element. It's central to
this conversation.
And so this is interesting on top of
it all. Thomas Massey shared this today. Now
I'm not necessarily convinced this ties into what
we're talking about. Either way, it's worthy it's
it's worth seeing, but it's worth considering that
this may well be exactly something going on
around all of this. So what this is
is there's been, like so remember, Mike Johnson's
in Israel.
And it weirdly, apparently, he sent some letter
about letting this guy act as house speaker
and taking action when no one's there.
Now Thomas Massie frames this as the speaker
of the house and the senate majority leader,
who aren't here right now, are convening a
pro form a session of congress
in empty chambers
during the August recess
solely, he claims, to block Donald Trump from
making recess appointments.
This is why is nobody covering this?
That's interesting. Now I always say he frames
it as that because I'm not really I
mean, this I I don't know. There's probably
many other things that could be. My point
though is that
clearly that seems odd around all that's happening
when they're all in Israel. It's very strange
or everything
else that's happening right now, even the Epstein
point, which they all left to hide from.
And I said, sure seems odd that Trump
and his gaggle of blind followers are not
screaming about this.
Right?
Why isn't Trump tweeting or shrewsocialling about this?
Doesn't that seem wild that he wouldn't be
the one going, what they're doing is wrong.
I'm supposed so
why?
That could suggest quite a few things. Sure.
But it certainly stands out, doesn't it? Now
here here is what the clip let you
listen to the clip because it makes it
very clear that Mike Johnson sent the letter
and, you know, why they would do this
now.
The house will be in order. The chair
lays before the the house a communication from
the speaker.
The speaker's Rooms, Washington DC, 08/05/2025.
From Tel Aviv. I hereby appoint the honorable
Mike Herodopoulos to act as speaker pro tempore
on this day. Signed, Mike Johnson, speaker of
the house of representatives.
The prayer will be offered
by the guest chaplain.
Pursuant to clause 13 of rule one, the
journal of the last stage proceedings is approved.
The chair will lead the house in the
pledge of allegiance.
Pursuant to clause 13 of rule one, the
house stands adjourned until 11:30AM
on Friday, August
5025.
To the senate, under the provisions of rule
one paragraph three of the standing rules of
the senate, I hereby appoint the honorable Mike
Rounds, a senator from the state of South
Dakota, to perform the duties of the chair
signed Chuck Grassley, president pro tempore.
Isn't that weird? Both of them send these
out to be done while no one's paying
attention?
Like, I mean, I you tell me what
you think. I mean, I I I'm not
even sure I'm truly grasping,
like, what this might really mean other than
what Thomas Matthews is pointing out. Like, clearly
the obvious. Right? Like, they could be doing
things. It'd be stopping Trump from pointing, but
something feels like there's more to this to
me.
Under the previous order, the senate stands adjourned
until 01:05PM
on Friday,
08/08/2025.
Now realize what they're you're only seeing kind
of, you know, the initiation of that and
then, like, the
jump forward to, like, you know, the initiation
or the the end of it. The point
though is that Massey, as we'll go back
to is I I closed it already, is
clearly suggesting
that this was to stop Trump from pointing
making appointments during this period.
So the fact that he's not screaming about
that
says something to me. Not that I even
know what that means, but what that is
some like, whether I don't think any of
the and what no media is talking about
this. Like, it seems like nobody wants to
see that going on. So I wanted to
include that, especially with what we just talked
about with all the different overlaps, where it's
going, the shifting of power. Something seems to
be weird. Now
I talked about this a few different things
in yesterday's show. The title was genetic,
biotech gen genomic data breach, that was Illumina,
Maxwell Obama distractions, and disaster relief exposes Israeli
influence. So I wanna give you a couple
of quick updates to that that I think
you should not miss the follow-up to yesterday
and wrap up here today.
This is actually pretty wild to me. So
we talked about it yesterday. It evolved
to
from the from the point that this was
first we kinda they first altered the page,
and here's the the page as it was
before.
Fiscal year 2025, DHS
standard terms and conditions.
So you should realize the fact they deleted
this is kind of insane. This is a
this is not just about that one point.
There's tons of definitions and standard guidelines that
are about all sorts of things, and this
one part was about discrimination and funding.
And so first, they added the part that
said
that you couldn't boycott or or basically that,
discriminatory prohibited boycott means refusing to deal or
working with specifically Israeli companies.
All you had to say was, company with
companies. I mean, it in the world any
other country in the world, but it has
to be only Israel or with companies doing
business with Israel.
And everybody,
even larger conservatives, were outraged by that. Then
they changed it. And
I don't think I have that up right
now. They altered it to go back to
just saying some basic version that didn't include
Israel.
And I pointed it out yesterday. And then
yesterday, it seemed that they added it back.
I had the live version, and it was
right there. I'm thinking that's very clear, very
weird that they would make this big point
to delete it and then somebody forced it
back or somebody did it without them knowing.
That's very interesting. And then
they deleted it.
In less than twenty four hours, that page
doesn't exist right now. Now as usual, they
could you know, if somebody really pushes them
in a week, they'll go, oh, yeah. We
just moved it over here that nobody knows
is there. Right? Like, there's always a game,
but that is interesting to me. So they've
deleted the page that listed that. Now, again,
this is not some small thing. This is
a 12 page document about all sorts of
different, you know, just age discrimination, Americans with
disabilities,
and now it's gone.
Obviously, because of what just happened, and they're
being I think it's I think it's showing
how desperate they are. But I said, and
now it appears the DHS has deleted the
page. So they got caught removing they got
caught, removed it, then added it back, and
then removed it entirely. Desperation. Here is salty
girl. Somebody pointing out the point from before.
DHS is straight up lying and gaslighting. Remember,
because they came out with this and said,
there's no FEMA requirement tied to Israeli money.
And even they kept fact checking saying, well,
that's very dishonest because you clearly did it
and then removed it and then posted this
going, that's not true, and then added it
back and then deleted the entire page over
the process of the last twelve hours.
How do you not see this for what
it is? Oh, here we go. I forgot
mail post this down here. Here's the here's
the first, you know, the way it was,
and then here's where they changed it to
some point yesterday.
Federal anti discrimination law means federal civil rights
that protect that's That's what it should say
in general. You don't have to make it
about one or the other. That applies to
all of them, doesn't it? But you see
somebody out there who has influence over people
in this in this position said it has
to be about only Israel, and they can
they applied or, complied.
And she said, why are you lying? So
DHS is or, you know, .gov is lying
about this.
So I have this in the back in
the show notes so you could look to
see what it said and that it's now
gone. Let's refresh, though. See if it comes
back. Nope. Still gone.
Very interesting.
So on on top of that, I don't
know how I somehow missed this yet. I
didn't miss it, but I think I read
it and then didn't, like, digest it. So
yesterday, you probably laughed at me when you
saw me read this, then looked around, like,
the part where it said literally what it
says right off the top. Just to reiterate,
though, you've been laughing me if you watched
yesterday's show. It's right there. It says after
this circulated social media, and that's this all
this point. All the,
the it's exactly the same conversation about the
the post and
not giving aid to people that boycott Israel.
It says after that circulated social media, the
Department of Homeland Security had apparently decided to
secretly violate the Federal Records Act by surreptitiously
editing the file.
Here oh, actually, I should show you this
too. Check this out.
Look at what it says right here. Now,
it says page not found, but they still
brazenly lie to you by saying the last
time it was updated was the first.
Okay. It's the sixth today.
Yesterday, we saw it change twice. And so
they're trying to lie to you and say
that they didn't and and the page is
now gone, but yet it's been the same
since the first?
You realize how desperate this makes them look?
They're caught, guys, and they're just deleting everything.
That's desperation.
My point, though, as to what he's saying
is this is legal. This is a crime.
This is they broke the law by altering
this information and hiding that they changed it.
But then he goes on to say the
best part, they forgot to scrub the metadata,
and then we talked about that yesterday. And
so you could literally prove that they did
change it and they tried to hide that
from you. And it's all right here. You
break it all down.
To be very, very clear, this is not
unique to Trump and his administration. Your government's
been doing this your whole life, the government.
The point though is that it's very, very
clear that this is getting worse by the
moment.
On top of that,
less important because of how it just ended
up so far today, but still really weird
to me.
This is from four zero four media. Constitution
sections on due process and foreign gifts and
habeas corpus, which I guess is due process,
just vanished from congress's website.
It did.
This is really it's really crazy to me.
So it says congress's website for The US
constitution, which is this page right here. You've
seen it many times. You brought it up.
Constitution anointed, and it goes through all the
different parts. And as of right now, is
complete.
It
says the website for the constitution was changed
to delete the last two sections of article
one, which include provisions such as habeas corpus,
forbidding the naming of titles of nobility, then
forbidding foreign
and US officials, all three of which are
super important to what we just talked about
today and seem to be, like, the focus
of what they're violating. And it just so
happens to be what this glitch removes.
I just think that's mathematically,
like, near impossible to believe, but certainly possible.
The full the last full version of the
web page, which they archived as well as
the archive where the change was, we have
for you. We'll show you next.
The web page maintained by the US government
hasn't changed significantly in the entire time it's
been saved by the archive since 2,019.
That doesn't mean I mean, that's just the
archive started. The point is,
arguably, this thing's been the same for a
really long time. The page for the constitution
on the National Archives website remains unchanged and
shows the entire document.
They removed this portion here.
Everything from this point down was gone all
day and from yesterday.
All the way down to the bottom of
section one. All that was gone. All stuff
we were generally highlighting already about, you know,
the writ of habeas corpus and all the
important things that we see being violated by
this current administration. But but more accurately your
government for a very long time, but very
clearly today in regard to immigration and plenty
of others. As people in the LEMI forum
conversation note, this could be a glitch, which
is what they're claiming now, or some kind
of error with the site.
But considering the page doesn't include many dynamic
elements, it's just text written out and is
mainly a text reprinting of the constitution,
a nearly four 240 year old document that
hasn't changed since the addition of the twenty
seventh amendment in 1992,
and that the page itself has barely changed
at all in the six years it's been
archived, it's a noteworthy and sudden move.
I mean, the point they're making for those
that understand the way this works, from back
end of a website, if it's just text
on a page, the idea that you could
have a glitch that would delete one weird
section seems nearly impossible to me. Not impossible.
You know, anything glitches are weird. But the
point though is that it's not like there's
some code that freaked out or some kind
of, you know, section that was an an
embed. It was it was text.
You could argue that somebody just, you know,
bumped the keyboard and deleted it, which again,
it just seems very, very unlikely. And why
is it open to be deleted in the
first place? Goes on to say, The Trump
administration does not have any control over the
congressional websites, which is true, at least, you
know, on the surface
today. I'm not that outside of things don't
hold water for me because ultimately, we know
and they've demonstrated they wanted to, they could
pretty much do whatever they want. But it
says the sudden disappearance of important parts of
the constitution
is happening in the context of a broader
government war on information. I mean, even just
think of the symbolism behind this vanishing in
exactly this time. I just think that's almost
comical if it wasn't so alarming.
Since the Trump administration took office,
official federal government websites with public information have
come under attack, being taken offline,
entirely altered to reflect their values.
Now it says habeas corpus, which is among
the now deleted provisions, but now back, on
the constitution web page allows people to challenge
the imprisonment before a judge. In May, Homeland
Security, Noam,
said before a congressional committee that Trump can
remove the constitutional provision of habeas corpus, calling
it a constitutional right that the president has
to be able to remove people
Embarrassingly
stupidly wrong, which I'll play for you right
now because I think that's hilarious, but we'll
come back to the rest.
And Trump.
Oop. Wait. Is it this one?
I guess I forgot to download
it or grab it entirely. Oh, I know
what I did. It's right here.
I forgot that I already downloaded.
So this the the reason this is so
wild
is that and it's not just that she
is in,
like, incorrect about what the president can do.
She literally doesn't understand what habeas corpus means.
And that's evidenced by the fact that she
continues forward and says, oh, Lincoln used
it. So to to be clear, Lincoln didn't
use habeas corpus. He suspended
habeas corpus, which at the time was actually
unconstitutional
until it was later ratified by congress because
it was, and he and he even apologized
for it or, you know, expressed that it
was unconstitutional.
So the point is that only Congress has
that power to suspend habeas corpus only in
two very specific situations, none of which are
met by even their narratives.
And she argued that, like, that it's the
right of the president to use habeas corpus.
Like, she just doesn't understand it. And that's
what's so terrifying, and it just so happens
to be the part that they that suddenly
vanishes.
Secretary
Noem, what is habeas corpus?
Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional
right that the president has to be able
to remove people from this country to suspend
their rights to Let me let me stop
you to suspend their rights to corpus. Excuse
me. That's that's incorrect. President Biden used it.
Let's see. Her effort to try to act
like just to demonstrate she still knows
makes it even more clear that she doesn't
know what she's talking about. And this is
what I call the junior team, guys. All
of them. These are people that are clearly
out of their depth, and
they're it's because as peep as others have
argued that people that are actually good at
their jobs or actually have principles would never
ever be in that position today because of
what you
because
Gabbard comes up and says something true and
she gets ran through the mud because Trump
doesn't care about the truth, or rather the
government has never cared about the truth. So
people with principles are like, yeah. Right. I'm
not gonna get involved in that, and here's
what we get left with. And then Israel
steps in as well. That excuse me. Mhmm.
Habeas corpus is the legal principle Mhmm. That
requires that the government provide a public reason
for detaining and imprisoning people. If not for
that protection, the government could simply arrest people,
including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for
no reason.
Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates
free societies like America from police states like
North Korea. As a senator from the live
free or die state, this matters a lot
to me and my constituents
and to all Americans.
So secretary Noem, do you support
the core protection
that habeas corpus provides that the government must
provide a public reason in order to detain
and imprison someone?
Yet I support habeas corpus. I also recognize
that the president of The United States has
the authority under the constitution.
Incorrect. Like like, explicitly incorrect. If it if
it's very clear that it's it's in the
power of the US Congress to to to
make that decision.
That that that's not even like an ar
like a legitimate debate to be had. It's
very clear,
and that's what she says. Probably because that's
what Trump said or because what somebody argued,
and she has no clue what she's talking
about. To decide if it should be suspended
or not. It has never Let us be
clear though. That's the presser. Done it has
never been done without approval of congress. Even
Abraham Lincoln got retroactive approval from congress.
Still still blows me away. Now the point
here is this has been added back. You
can see right here on the on the
current section, it goes down to 10.
And here here is what
oh, just shout to social media, by the
way, who also pointed this out and said,
oh, weird. Parts of article one of the
constitution, specifically habeas corpus, just vanished.
But they're working to correct it. That's what
it said for a minute. Working to correct
the issue.
You can't just, like, copy and paste it
back. Like, it's all it really is, guys.
Just very, very weird. Good on them for
calling it out. Hit Rolling Stone says, quotes
what they say. Due to a technical error,
which, again, I I mean, I would love
for them to explain how in the world
a technical error can cause one specific section
of text from a text post to just
vanish.
Tech due to a technical error, some sections
of article one were temporarily missing missing on
the constitution anointed website. Apparently, one of the
first times that we've ever seen. This problem
has been corrected, and the missing sections have
been restored. Hooray for liberty.
I mean, it just seems really strange.
Now,
last point, I wanna play this clip, and
we'll do a couple points on the way
out. This is about Epstein. You know, you're
pretty much already abreast of what's going on.
This I find interesting for far more than
just about what's happening.
You're about the year Candace Owens
say that we were fooled by Trump, which,
by the way, shouldn't be a shock to
anybody paying attention right now, but it's actually
crazy that I mean, Jones is still trying
to drag this out like he always does
into sort of like, yes. He's doing bad
things, but we still love him and we're
gonna fight for him, but he might be
the antichrist. I mean, there's this whole little
stick.
Candace is just she comes out when his
setup seems to try to make a sound
like it's sort of not Trump's fault, but
Candace comes out and goes, we were we
were playing. I thought Trump was something he's
and he I thought he was this, but
he's not. That is gonna be a massive
shattering moment, guys. The fact that Candace Owens
or people at that level with that many
influence or supporters,
it's going to change the conversation.
And just just recognize it's not just about
Trump, guys. It's not about any of the
just pieces in this play. The the this
is about the US government, about the Israeli
government, and about the manipulation of ours of
our country. And so if you're
unable to wrap your mind around that because
you think it's only about Trump, then you
can pull back from that. This is much
bigger than that. And they're finally either being
forced to acknowledge it because it's too obvious
or they're finally seeing it. You can decide
for yourself.
Alex Jones frames it says, president Trump says
he was unaware of just laying Maxwell's prison
transfer.
Who actually believes that? That's insane. We'll read
something about it, which are the people connected
to his administration basically say that's just not
true. And it's not normal, and it was
very weird, and all the same stuff we've
talked about.
And Trump
states that he did not know that Ghislaine
Maxwell was removed to club fed minimum security
prison at all. He defended the action but
said he was unaware of the move. How
much does he know? He's Yeah. Defended it,
but then didn't know about it.
Very Trump. Also said,
that, you know, he doesn't know about any
of these grand juries now finally convened on,
No. Not as far as I can tell,
by the way. The Russiagate hoax coup. So
here's this clip. I want you to in
closing respond to this. So you're telling me
that Trump didn't even know about the about
Russia? I mean, that just doesn't even line
up with everything anything we're seeing. Trump has
spoken about these things.
But here he is going like, I don't
know. Who what's that? Epstein? Who's that? You
know? It's it's it's embarrassing.
But they'll always tow the line or at
least Alex will very clearly try. But here's
what Candace has to say after he reads
the statement. Questions for you. One, did you
were you aware of and did you personally
approve the prison transfer for Ghislaine Maxwell that
your justice department I didn't know about it
at all. No. I read about it just
like you did. And do you believe that
she See, I was saying about it earlier.
Isn't that embarrassing? Even if that's the truth,
how embarrassing is that?
You read about it? Like, so look. I'm
not saying every single decision needs to involve
the president, but you're gonna tell me that
you don't even know about
about it until you so you were last
in line. The media knew about this before
you did?
That's wildly embarrassing, and yet that shows me
he's willing to make himself look bad in
order to hide something.
It's not a very uncommon thing. In fact,
it seems to be very uncommon. We'll get
into in a second. Do you believe that
she's credible to be listening to? Your deputy
attorney general sat down with her recently. Well,
he's let me tell you. He's a very
talented man.
His name is Todd Blanch. He's a very
legitimate person, very high.
I I just have very highly thought of
person, respected by everybody.
And, I didn't talk to him about it,
but I will tell you that,
whatever he asked would be totally appropriate, and
it's not an uncommon thing to do that.
So what's interesting is this how it tends
to go. But you're there are people in
the past that he said exact glowing things
like that about and then hates him two
days later.
Alright? Plenty of them. So my point is
that when he does that, it's because he's
trying to set the table, in my opinion,
for whatever's about to come out from Todd
Blanche.
That he's smart and great and knows everything
and whatever he says next is gonna be
right. Gotcha.
Marching orders. That's what I read it as.
You can decide for yourself. And I think
he probably wants to make sure that, you
know, people that should not be involved or
aren't involved or not hurt by something that
would be very, very unfortunate, very unfair to
a lot of people.
Right. So the continual argument that somebody you
know, victims could be okay. Are they or
not? Like, if are you claiming that there
are names that you're withholding because they're victims,
or are you just keeping continue to broadly
state that anything we don't show you is
probably under that umbrella? Doesn't that matter?
And
now,
just like Maxwell told DOJ, Trump never did
anything concerning
anything around her. Yeah. We'll get to that
in a second too. Right? So that's new.
That's as of yes late yesterday today. The
point
is the weird flip. In fact, I'll just
quickly show you
Orwell's tweet.
Simply says, how it's all going down.
Donald and Jeffrey were joined at the hip.
There is never a party that Donald missed.
Maxwell is, you know, kind of framing the
past conversations.
And then Trump,
clemency, pardon, immunity, whatever that happened behind the
scenes. And now now that I think about
it, he's never been involved with that.
I mean, it's Eva Kosova is going like,
come on. Like, it's a weird series of
events. You meet her, you give her a
box of materials. She claims they sings on
a 100 people, Jones reports, and all the
rest, and then nothing happens. And yet now
she's going nothing Trump wasn't involved, and they
don't want her to testify.
It's all drifting in the background. I start
to feel that way. And weirdly, I've been
I mean, we that's been my opinion about
where it seems to be going this entire
time.
Now Candace Owens is gonna tell you the
exact same thing.
So
people are saying this doesn't look too good,
Candace, but I never saw any evidence of
Trump No. As she's saying. So why red
carpeter? Because somebody in his orbit is connected.
K. So this is clear. Even the last
statement he made was seriously trying to downplay,
you know, no evidence. I mean, come on.
I'm not claiming there's evidence of him raping
kids, but very clearly there's a mountain of
evidence that he's very close, including that Epstein
called him one of his closest friend for
ten years. You won't hear that from him.
Or the fact that over the overarching point
that he
was pictured with him many times, he was
on the plane many times whether or not
he went to the island. That's all evidence
about this whole point. So it just seems
like a really desperate effort to you know,
but here's what Candace Owens says, and it
really does align with, you know, what I
think is the honest perspective of this personally.
Mhmm. Absolutely. That's what I'm saying. It feels
like they went in there and,
will you agree to say this, say that?
Will move you to a nice cushy cushion
cushiony prison, you know, so you can live
out the rest of your sentence? He's gonna
pardon her, by the way, that's coming down
the pipeline. That That didn't seem to be
at all what Jones just framed it as,
by the way. But he said, maybe I'm
missing what he said. Seems like he tried
to go the other way and she pulled
it back to Trump's probably guilty.
You know, seems like that was interesting to
me, but I agree with what you're saying.
And like I said, it's just sad to
see this. It's just it genuinely makes me
sad because I devoted so much so many
years to getting out there and campaigning for
Trump. I I truly believed him, and I
just feel like the the the scales are
falling off of my eyes here. And I'm
just realizing there is no entity that has
more power than than the Israel lobby in
America and all around the world, by the
way. France is fighting this two people locked
up for antisemitism for telling the truth.
Like, you can literally go to prison if
you tell the truth, if it points to
a larger conspiracy about who has control. So
it's not just America that's fighting this. But,
you know, I I don't know. We have
to look towards the future. People that are
willing to stand up to this are the
people that should be platformed, and I think
in the future, it will become a litmus
test.
Yeah. Right? Funny how that you know, this
is the effort to make, like, you know,
I'm sitting here while she says that, so
therefore, I'm on. No. You are the built
like, what she's showing you is exactly what
is being exposed through things like what Alex
are doing. The, you know, the litmus test,
very clearly. And she says, if you are
not seeing this, if you're not calling it
out, he's not. He's giving you lip service
about overlapping points that have been transparent for
decades, but not really the understanding of what
the evidence is pointing to or what Trump
is lying to you about, all the efforts
to cover it up. He went he went
over weeks telling you that it was a
hoax. Day after day that it's a Democrat
hoax and Russia or they lied about it
and Obama lied to everybody,
which he did.
But now it's weird how that's not the
topic anymore. Is it a hoax still or
is it not? Does the list exist? You
just we just gotta start being honest about
how dishonest these people are, guys. And I
I think it's very obvious right now who's
trying to grapple with all of it.
Now David Icke says about that clip. He
they they they said because the point was
Jones, as he does, rep we post, like,
the same thing 17 different times and captioned
it differently. He says, Alex Jones, talking about
himself, holds the position that we shouldn't throw
the baby out of the bathwater. Should fight
to get Trump back on course. You see
my point?
The idea that you're still we still have
hope that Trump is that's not what Candace
is saying. Okay? She she's saying I see
through it now.
It's just sad, this desperate hang on to
the tea. That's that's the gravy train, though.
So David Icke says he is on course,
Trump. The course that David said he was
on since he came on the political scene
in 2016,
but which neither of them, in his point,
could see when those paying attention and not
blinded by partisan politics saw it as obvious.
Yes.
100% the point.
Now include these for you. Maxwell told DOJ,
Trump never did anything concerning around her.
Just feels really ridiculous to me. During her
nine hours, nine hours speaking with Todd Blanch,
really great guy, really knows what he's saying,
whatever he says tonight is gonna be true.
Jesseline Maxwell
said nothing during the interview that would be
harmful to president Trump, telling Blanche that Trump
had never done anything in her presence that
would have so why didn't that come out
immediately?
Why wasn't that, like, a first thing? Funny
how this has been, like, the coordinated conversation,
which is kinda where this is going.
Clearly,
we can't prove that. Now what they go
on to say is that Meet is considering
publicly releasing the transcripts, but most likely not
the audio. That certainly speaks for itself. Transcripts
can be printed out and altered. Audio can
be altered, but it's much more difficult to
get away with today because of all the
I mean, they got caught altering the video
in the Epstein file or the Epstein, you
know, when he was in prison.
I mean, it's so funny how many examples
we keep seeing of them getting blatantly caught
desperately trying to deceive you, and then we
just move forward or the the team support
politics moves forward. But it says there's also
an audio recording of the interview. Sources said
it's not clear whether they're gonna plan to
release
that. The public release of the transcript could
come soon as this week. Okay. So it's
gonna be text on a piece of paper.
Why would we ever take that at face
value right now?
Maxwell's lawyer said following her meetings with Blanche,
they would welcome any relief and said that
Maxine was asked about 100 different people. That
key that's the quote they keep swinging around.
Now, are they a 100 Democrats
that they just wanted to frame in this
problem? Are they a 100 people that she
knew were guilty?
Maxwell was asked
about a 100 people.
You get from the Jones and the rest
that she sung at a 100 people and
it's all coming down. Well, that's not what
that says. That's not even what they gave
her a box
and clearly, I think we're setting this up.
That's how it feels to me and that's
even what it seems Candace is getting at
now. Trump asked Tuesday whether he approved the
prison transfer, and he said, I didn't know
about it, which is embarrassing.
Okay.
So here on this just and interesting enough,
the the first framing of this
in in this article,
which is telling about even corporate media, Maxwell
told DOJ Trump never did anything
concerning
around her.
That's exactly what she says. This I I'd
argue this is the best framing from the
corporate media.
Well, accurate, I should say. Then here's independent.
Just like Maxwell told justice department she never
saw Trump do anything concerning with Epstein.
Ah,
very different thing to say, isn't it? Actually,
not the accurate statement. So why is the
independent
almost trying to help Donald Trump or at
least reporting it inaccurately
to his benefit? But it says, Suzanne Maxwell
said she never saw Trump do anything that
would cause concern.
Also a very different statement than either of
the other two. What was said is that
she never saw around her, him do anything
inappropriate,
which seems really hard to believe with even
his past examples, but what she's insinuated and
others have insinuated or even peep victims of
Epstein have accused Trump of crimes.
So raw story reports, just not plausible. Donald
Trump's Maxwell excuse gets brutal fact check from
stunned expert. It says a fact check a
a law a lawyer responded, fact check, one
of Trump's more outlandish claims.
Trump was asked by CNN whether he knew
of or approved Jeffrey Epstein's compliance, the transfer
to the minimum security prison. Trump denied both
and claimed that he he that he learned
about it from the news.
Trump added it was not uncommon.
The last claim stunned that it was uncommon
or not uncommon. The last claim stunned,
Ryan Goodman, who's a former special counsel of
department of defense and a lawyer at at
professor
law professor at NYU. He correct corrected Trump
on, interview. He said, this has to this
had to be approved by someone very senior
at the Bureau of Prisons, which by the
way, again, was the one that transferred her,
not the marshals, which is also abnormal. But
it says, it's so unusual.
He says, look. President Trump should have just
said we're dealing with an unusual situation, so
something unusual happened.
That would be one way of approaching it.
Instead, he comes out and goes, no big
deal. No. Nothing different at all when you
can look and go, yeah. It is unusual,
so why do you lie about that? What
he said is not plausible, Goodman continued, and
it's not and it's so unusual that you
would hope the justice department would have informed
him that he would not learn about it
in the news.
I don't believe that. I think that's insane
to argue.
Quote, it's such an extraordinary step taken with
very high profile conduct.
Lastly, Trump aids plan to plead with Joe
Rogan to end the Epstein crisis. I think
they're desperate right now.
Senior Trump administration, excuse me,
leaders are reportedly looking at using megastar Joe
Rogan to help tackle lingering fallout from the
Jeffrey Epstein crisis. What's weird about this is
not even the way that it's just being
framed. What they're saying
makes it very clear they're, like, in managed
damage control right now. It says vice president
JD Vance is set to host a dinner
with his resident
at his residence on Wednesday evening to hash
out the Trump administration's next move on the
Maxwell audio transcript.
Doesn't that seem weird in and of itself?
Okay. If this is about the truth,
not and we're not talking about redacting. They're
meeting at their dinner party to discuss what
they're doing with this stuff.
Why would that make sense to anybody?
Release it. If you've already redacted and done
what you've done, release it. The fact that
you have to meet and discuss the way
to plan this outright shows me that there's
coordination about how they want this to roll
out. That's dishonesty.
The gathering
will include deputy attorney general Todd Blanch, the
White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles, of
course, people call the handler of Trump, many
all of which have very clear connections to
Israel, attorney general, Pam Bondi, also, and Kash
Patel, also, according to three sources familiar with
the plan. So you get the core team
here, the crew. Right?
Cash, Bongino, Wiles, Bondi, and now Todd Blanche.
To me,
that is like the the the team that's
been gaslighting you around most of these things,
all of which are blindly supporting Israel. All
of them. Like, Bongino said the one thing
close to his heart is Israel. I mean,
you just can't hide this stuff. According to
CNN,
the Department, of Justice has been working to
digitize, transcript, and redact over ten hours of
audio. That's what they were doing.
The meeting will attempt to craft a, quote,
unified response to the handling of the Epstein
case. They're trying to handle you guys. They're
trying to corral you. They're trying to manage
you.
It says, two sources told the network that
all but Vance are the core players shaping
the administration's ongoing strategy regarding Epstein files. Why
do you need an ongoing strategy
to release the truth?
Among the options under discussion is a media
blitz led by Blanche.
That Trump's already set the table. Whatever he
says is gonna be right. That's what they're
not they know what they're doing. It's very
obvious if you pay attention. Three people familiar
with the internal talks told CNN that aids
have floated a press conference or a podcast
appearance with Rogan.
That's propaganda, guys. Who endorsed Trump in the
twenty twenty four election but has actually criticized
him around the Epstein case in particular?
Officials in the Trump administration determined that Epstein
death was a suicide. They just add that.
Don't forget that.
We all know that's not true. And Cash
and Bongino sat there and deadpan told you
for sure.
Even though they they were making the rounds
about how it was all gonna come out,
it was all Democrats, and then never mind.
Not true. You're a conspiracy theorist. You're cowards.
You're weaklings.
The The Trump administration in February declassified and
released files related to Epstein, but they were
highly redacted and did not offer any more
revelations. Again, they hoped that was enough. They
waited how you responded. And then when you
said that's nothing, they went, oh, wait. It's
all on my desk. I've got truckloads coming
in. And then nothing happened. And then they
told you the files were a hoax, that
you just can't it's comical how this has
been going if it wasn't so serious.
A July memo from the DOJ and FBI
said no additional material would be released.
The two officials said the material from the
with interview could be released as early as
this week. We already told you that. One
of the internal debates centers on whether releasing
the interview could reignite the Epstein scandal,
something which the some officials close to Trump
believe has largely died down.
Right. So that's about the truth?
Or even if it is the truth,
considering not releasing that truth because it benefits
us.
But we're honest though. It's all about information.
Right?
You just can't ignore this stuff. It's right
on the surface. They don't care about the
truth. Even if you think it's secondary.
Number one is their agenda, is their influence,
their control.
No different than either side.
And again, Orwell lays it out very clearly
here that to me, it seems obvious that
this is about,
you know, that something has shifted. Let's put
it that way to be objective.
And everyone's calling it out, guys, other than
the obvious. Now, lastly, to kinda bring this
back around, which we'll talk about in a
new show in a coming up show, but
tying it all together in an interesting way.
This is an exclusive that came out, August
1. How Karim Khan at the ICC,
how is his his how his Israel war
crimes probe was derailed by threats,
leaks,
and sex claims.
Doesn't that certainly sound familiar?
It's exactly what we're talking about, guys. Suddenly,
there's a big case with all sorts of
evidence about how they're committing war crimes. And
what do you know? A sex allegation is
spun up around this guy. Now it could
be that it was made up, could be
that it was real. Either way, where do
you think that came from?
It's exactly what we're highlighting here. What do
you think they have on people in the
administration? What do you think they have in
Biden's administration? This.
That's what I think. I think it's pretty
obvious to prove. It is a network. It's
Epstein. Well, the Epstein was one part of
it. It was a network that they're still
utilizing to influence power structures. You know, and
I'll include this one for you as well.
David Ike and I had a great interview
about this. And he he's really one of
the people that opened my eyes to the
the kinda Sabbateanism side of this whole thing,
but it's called Zionism
infiltration of Judaism, weaponized migration, and mainstream alternative
media.
The point is that this he discusses Sabatianism
as a kind of foundational element
of three things, communism, Nazism, and Zionism. And
what is the core point? Infiltration of religions
and governments.
It's all right there for us. It's all
right there. And the point, guys, is I
think that's very clearly what's going on in
this country, in this government, and everywhere else
dealing with this right now.
I think it's very clear.
All I'm hoping is that you're out there
listening and willing to consider
the information.
And then hopefully take one more step and
look at the source material and read it
for yourself. And then take a step back
and consider whether I might be wrong. Consider
whether I missed something, and then share that
with me. And then we could talk about
it the next time. Or have discussions with
your friends and your family and get sit
down and have a tea lab Tuesday or
whatever, you know, like we do on AMYCO
and discuss what we do have we talks
about. You have to sit there and watch
the show, print out the material, have the
talking points written down and be like, this
is what we talked about or anybody else
for that matter. Let's discuss this amicably.
We can disagree, but let's debate and discuss
and find that's what they're afraid of, guys.
An educated, informed
electorate.
Please stand up. Start calling this stuff out.
Thank you for being here today. I don't
believe I'm gonna get to a show tomorrow.
I will if I have time, but I've
got two different interviews I'm doing tomorrow. I've
got a lot of good interviews coming up.
I'm gonna be talking with James Corbin about
the whole give WP thing to get, you
know, more of his perspective on it and
really make sure people see that. We talked
about it at two different shows. I shared
you his article about it. It seems to
have been corrected, but nonetheless, it's worth discussing,
not just that it happened, but how little
coverage you got in any
context. But I'm gonna be having, Dave Decamp
from antiwar.com
coming up soon.
Who else was it? There's a few more
coming. I'm on with German warfare tomorrow morning.
Jimmy Dora, I believe tomorrow night. Those might
not come out tomorrow, but plenty, plenty coming
your way.
And I and, again, in case you missed
the previous notes, we've I I'm gonna be
doing the Monday podcast with, called fine points
with Bitchute going forward. And I really I
really enjoy the conversation. We clearly, you watch
it. We disagree on plenty of stuff, and
I value that for Bitchute in in particular.
But the conversation primarily about constitutional rights, about
the the issues in that one vein, but
plenty of others that continue to go forward.
So thank you for your support for this
platform. Thank you for standing up for the
truth. I love you all. As always, question
everything. Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.