Alright, Vladimir. If you don't end that war
in Ukraine in fifty days, I'm gonna do
something very strong.
Oh, god. This again. Okay. Right. Right. Cool.
What's that cool? I'll show you cool. Now
you have ten days. Okay. Maybe twelve. Love
it. Can't wait. Okay. That's it.
Ow. Holy shit.
Why did you hit me? Why did you
hit me? Look. Somebody's gonna pay the price
for Vladimir not listening to me, and it's
not gonna be me. Alright? But he is
also helping Russia.
More than I'd like to, less than I
could. Yeah. Well, but he's you know, he
and I were talking. It's a little you
know, it's more complicated. It's
Look. I'm just glad we're not talking about
Jeffrey Epstein.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Tuesday, 08/05/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Thought we
start with something a little lighter today. I
thought that was funny. And it's not just
about one side of the paradigm. It's pretty
much just everybody in politics today and everybody,
especially in American politics. But it's just interesting
to see how, you know, obvious a lot
of this stuff is. Now we're gonna not
gonna get into the tariffs today. We're not
gonna get into a couple of the points
that you could kinda glean from that conversation.
But it's just interesting to see the the,
you know, the bluster and the gay and
and yet how many people will just follow
suit with what the people in the the
screen you know, what I call the screamers,
people at the top of the of the
false two party paradigm just pointing you in
the direction they want you to go in.
But, you know, it's it's just it's
very obvious is the point of that clip
today. It's just I don't I mean, I
know it's hard it's easy to fall into
your,
you know, I guess, your echo chamber is
the best word for it. But the reason
I had to say that word is because
if you're aware of that, does it mean
is it the same term? I guess so.
The point though is that, you know, I
think we try hard in this community to
to think about, to at least do our
best to reflect on how that can happen.
Because let's be clear, it can happen, and
it is happening
even though we know about it because of
just algorithmic manipulation, the way the technology is
going.
But point being, I still think regardless of
that being, you know, that being said of
the echo chamber, how that can affect the
way you see things, I think it's obvious
that so many people are starting to question
things. I mean, and day by day, every
single day, it gets more interesting to see
the way that this starts to break down
and the way that people kind of engage
with it, the way that people try to
run from it, the way that some people
have just never seen it their entire lives
despite how obvious we felt that it was
up until now. Regardless, we're here. I think
we all see it, and it's interesting to
see how the the political teams go back
and forth, how the, you know, the Tuckers
and the Loomers are fighting about different things.
It's just it's just very fascinating. But at
the same time, very real. Very real. There's
a lot of very obviously real and, you
know, human lives being taken every moment in
other fields of war. What's going on in
this country has very real consequences.
What we're gonna talk about today
is, something interesting that was shared with me
around a a biotech
genomics company
that I that,
surprise, surprise, is very immersed with Israel. And
it's not just that being the story, but
what happened.
They're paying about just shy of $10,000,000
in in,
basically, fines for false claims. You know, that
thing that Pfizer gets accused of and found
guilty of all the time, but we don't
talk about, which is true. But
false claims
in regard
to the safety,
the cybersecurity
more specifically around your genomic data. Well, you
know you know what I you know what
I've talked about. How long have I said
this? Every single time. Is this not what
happens every oopsie. We had a cybersecurity issue.
Well, this turns out that it wasn't just
an issue that they are they lied about
having security around that. Now what I find
interesting is this is a company that's immersed
in with Israel. And what's going on is
not just Israel, but we know they're a
major part in where this direction is going.
Remember, Pfizer, they called themselves Pfizer's lab. And
there's a reason for that because this all
overlaps with what was being done around that.
The the genetic engineering, the genetic modification, the
the genomics in general about your personal genetic
information
in regard to the term. It can be
applied differently, but that's what I'm discussing is
the information that is is very valuable to
these companies from your personal you know, from
probably the society in general and their genomic
information. And so this was not meant to
be public, wasn't meant to be seen or
accessed by these governments, but apparently now it
can be. And it's interesting to see where
this all leads back to. I wanna start
with that story today because I do find
it really interesting as kind of a I
mean, it's a large story, but it really
is a microcosm in the larger issue that
we're talking about.
So we're gonna start pretty much with that
story, save for a couple of few points
I wanna get to. We're gonna talk about
just like Maxwell,
Epstein, and the kind of updates to now,
which are are actually pretty interesting in where
this is going. That's kinda what I was
touching on in my my opening there, the
statement about how interesting it is just to
watch the way this plays out. It's I
mean, it's hard to watch sometimes how truly
embarrassing it is, not just because of how
we see it, but, like, looking at the
way conservatives engage with this. You know, Republicans,
even team sport politics,
it's hard to watch sometimes because it's just
so obvious, but it's continuing to break down,
which is a good thing and people are
seeing it. But about the potential recording that
they might release, what's happened so far in
regard to the court process,
And, you know, I my opinion stands the
same. We'll go through it. I think we
all sense where this is probably going to
end up. I hope not. I hope it's
more transparent from the most transparent
administration in history.
You can even say that with a straight
face. I mean, it's just one more the
same thing with the government we've seen the
entire time. It's just your government. They don't
have any interest in being honest with you.
And the Obama overlap to that, which I
think is interesting in regard to what's actually
happening, The claims of an a grand jury
investigation into Obama that doesn't seem to have
anything actually happening. They're stating that, but there
has not been a single move in that
direction as far as I can tell. There
has, however, been a move in the direction
of
subpoena
subpoenaing
putting out subpoenas
for Bill Clinton,
Hillary Clinton.
Or was it Hillary Clinton? Yeah. It was
Hillary and Bill.
Will Barr Billy, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, all
in relation to
Jeffrey Epstein.
Very interesting, but same point, I find that
in I think this is just a dog
and pony show. I think these people will
be paraded around and make it look great
and whether they even show up, and I
don't think anything will happen, sadly. I think
history has shown us that with the last
time Bill and Hillary and others have already
been accused with evidence to nail to the
wall and nothing ever happens.
We'll talk about
what's going on in Gaza and Israel, but
as it relates, really, I guess, to only
come points to that today. I'm tomorrow, I'll
be doing another show, and we'll talk more
about what's going on with that. Very important
things continually to talk about as it relates
even to Americans.
But I wanna talk today when we get
to it late the latter part of the
show around,
you know, general topic, Israel in Israel infiltration
of this country, which, you know, we've been
ham ringing that bell for a long time,
and I think
more than I've ever seen, it's breaking down.
Recently, because of the
Israel aid rather the, disaster relief aid discussion,
which I'm sure you all saw, went across
the broke the Internet, where all of a
sudden people were saying, wait a minute. You
can't make it a condition to
defend Israel or not boycott them. Like, most
of us are going, where the f have
you guys been? Like, this has been hurricane
Harvey, and we'll talk about that today. There
are plenty of other examples. Like, I saw
Kevin Sorbo go, what the heck? It's like,
gosh. How is this not public by now?
It's like, you know, the interesting part is
we shouldn't disparage. Like, people are seeing it.
Fine. Let that be the case. We'll deal
with whether or not people are using that
truth to get benefit. You know, people that
always have been dishonest, you wanna pretend that
they're now seeing it. The point is acknowledge
that people are seeing it. And we're gonna
get into the overlap of
that infiltration, but as it pertains to relief
aid, but also just the bigger picture of
what we are now seeing and how it
is continuing to break down, that people are
seeing it more and more every second right
now. George Galloway calls out the the Wailing
Wall discussion. And I'm thinking to myself, man,
at what point have we, like
criticizing them going to Wailing Wall, even in
the context you did, which is completely accurate.
It's not about religion, or it is, but
it's in the sense that it's an oddity
the way that Christians well, we'll get into
it. My point is that
that's even still being called racist, but but
a year ago, a couple years ago, that
would have been, like,
ostracized from society, and it's just shifting. People
are starting to recognize that it doesn't make
much sense. Even if it's just our government
recognizing that Israel has that much power and
willing to just feign that interest so they
get that influence, that's still a political dishonesty,
but we know it goes further than that.
So we're gonna go into that quite deep
at the end today, but let's start
with oh, really, just, this first part just
to shout out the person I got that
from. Shay Shay Bowes played this that shared
that clip. And I just think it's it's
it is funny. Again, it is sometimes just
worth, you know, letting a little steam out.
You know, not not everything has to be
the end of the world, and I do
think that's an entertaining clip to to look
at even though it is,
you know, crazy.
It's real, what's going on, how cartoonish that
is. But let's start with some health stuff
that I want this is something that I
really wanna get into, and I'm not gonna
play this whole thing. It's about twenty one
minutes.
Couple points about health, then we'll get into
the overlap of Illumina Inc, which is the
company we're talking about, the biotech company, which
is obviously around health.
But this this is a
a a a, I guess, a documentary, a
a twenty one minute kind of mini doc
around East Palestine.
The title for this more perfect union, how
a multibillion
dollar company blew up a train and got
away with it.
So I'm gonna play a couple points points
on this. I have some three things I
wanted to point you point out. And we'll
just start with the opening and then show
you a couple things that stand out. Now
that you guys that have already watched this,
you already know. You already know.
Moral of the story, nothing's changed. Nobody was
helped. People are still struggling. Norfolk Southern, as
far as I can tell, has gained tremendously
from the situation.
My personal opinion. But it's important to understand
what's still going on. And the the point
that I think stands out is that a
lot of these people were convinced
that if Trump got into power, everything would
change. Guess what didn't change? You can hear
from you'll hear from them yourself.
And my heart's kinda pair pattering
just sitting here with these memories and looking
around.
It's kinda,
making the hair stand up on the back
of my neck, and I feel like I
might puke. Yeah.
Like, this is what they did to us.
This is what they did to our community,
and it all started right here. Yeah. Yeah.
The last time I was in East Palestine,
things were
pretty different.
Look at those flames.
Look at that shit. The town is under
a state of emergency
after 50 train cars derailed causing a massive
fire a half mile long, which lit up
the night sky and burned for hours.
I'm from this county. I went to their
high school dances, barbecues,
and I was there a few weeks after
the derailment
to document the unfolding man made disaster. Do
I have to wait until I have cancer
before you guys are gonna do anything? Why
the fuck would you let Norfolk do that?
Like, why would you let them clean up
their own mess?
Two years later, East Palestine is quiet.
It's the twilight zone. It's like living on
this movie set, this fantasy world.
But behind the scenes, a much bigger scandal
is still unfolding. Every one of these little
stories in of itself is shocking, but the
totality of it,
like, we have been stabbed in the back
I was doing it. By everyone. Do you
feel like Norfolk Southern paid as big a
price as you did?
You gotta be outside your mind.
You must be outside your mind. I wish
there was one smoking gun here. The problem
is with East Palestine, there's about 30 smoking
guns. There are no accidents.
This derailment
was 100%
preventable.
I'm a Trump supporter.
He needs to make this right.
He has the the ability, the opportunity to
So it's interesting to me.
All these different part you know, this is
not new, guys. You know, these kinda scenes
remind me of Flint, Michigan.
They remind me of a lot, quite frankly.
And it happens
every damn time.
People and and it's it's not be it's
not always just like one entity.
Right? But there's just peep it's because of
the power structure that has allowed rampant lawlessness
to lead the day, where people then recognize
the opportunity and they step in
everywhere.
And things like this end up half the
time, these places end up worse than they
were before, not even because of the accident,
but because obviously, part of it. But because
the people that come in after the fact
and just, like, vultures. I mean, it's funny
how we don't even talk about Lahaina anymore.
You know? And it should and the point
is that there's no real resolution.
Do you realize that Flint, Michigan? Yeah. You
know how the end that sentence goes. Right?
Still doesn't yeah. It's just insane that we
can't look at what that shows us and
say, okay. If they never actually solved the
the Flint water
despite all the big talk and all the
and there was never even accountability,
why would we think anything else would be
different? That was an a criminal act. So
too was this, if we're actually gonna understand
the facts. What's interesting to me
oh, and at that point about the 30
smoking guns.
You know, this is exactly what we talked
about. Right? The idea that they were spreading
out the issue so that it became so
background noise that there was no way to
to tell the difference, especially now.
God, good luck trying to prove it now
that it's been so long. It could be
any number of other things, including the COVID
shots that are still hurting people. You know,
all these things conflate, and there's a design
to that. But I think what's interesting let's
not forget.
Like, everything we've seen since, and especially since
people are starting to pay a lot closer
attention, is it not the wildest thing in
the world that they, that a movie literally
came out called White Noise that showed, like,
the exact same thing in the exact same
place. I mean, it's just a cartoon. How
in the world is that possible? Mathematically speaking
or not, then but let alone all the
other things we've seen. I'm not claiming one
way or the other. I'm just pointing out
exactly what happened
and how insane that is.
But I think it's worth us considering
that there is more going on, especially because
of how dark things are starting to get
and not because it's not going because we're
going in the wrong direction. Quite frankly, I
think we're finally moving in the direction of
truth, and that's why it's getting so complicated
because people in power, or however you wanna
look at it, have no interest in that,
and they're desperate for their own well-being to
keep us in this dark. The but I
just think that's worth noting. Now I wanna
jump to four minutes and forty three,
play a couple of points on here that
I think are relevant.
Back or something, or when did you move?
We ran out of money.
When we left, I had $40 on my
savings account. $40.
So I'm still suffering health effects,
and they want me to go back to
this house that I know is not safe
to go back.
To this Now the more you get into
this too and and the more we I
mean, everybody, everywhere, other than people in positions
of power, have made it clear that to
this very
day, people are suffering in their homes, in
the area.
Now, again,
actually, a point of of,
you know, giving somebody credit where it's due,
Status Ku, I'm forgetting is off the top
what's the guy's name? I forget off the
top. We we interviewed him a long time
ago. I've I've given him I've I've called
him out for things in the past, but
I wanna say we're, that's driving me crazy.
Give me the name of in this in
the chat from Status Ku.
He has stuck with things like this for
a long time to the point when when
clearly that people it's not as a big
story. Clearly, he's invested in getting the truth
out about this, and I think that's worthy
of note. Regardless of whether we think people
are playing partisan politics or whatever, it's very
rare that I see people Jordan Sheraton, thank
you, Who who you know, like, he was
Flint. That's why I originally interviewed him because
he he was still talking about Flint when
nobody else was trying to nail that story
and interviewing people. I just think that there's
a lot of credit there. And he they
had done a great job really going after
the story. I I don't know if they
are at this in the moment, but they
had been for a very long time. Well
past the, you know, whatever the window is
or people think it's worth their time to
talk about these things as opposed to just
what's important to talk about. You know? And
I think that's worth pointing out. But there's
a this, this part continues right here. Today,
the EPA and the state of Ohio still
claim that East Palestine is safe.
But in just the last two years,
hundreds of residents have reported getting sick. Look
at my eyes.
I look crazy.
Now you could clearly point out to be
objective
that some of this could just be other
things. Some of this could be, you know,
any number of other problems that are actually
still going on, like dioxins in which actually
the same conversation. But, you know, things like
the COVID nineteen side effects or shots rather
is what I mean. The the injections and
so on. Now that's just one things that
people would come to mind. Any number of
other things we probably probably don't even know
are going on. The point is that was
what the design was in my opinion. One
part is to this point, there's no way
you could ever prove that these things are
because of what they did. Now if you
let's say you start getting test results to
show you that you have high levels of
dioxins in your blood, that may have some
standing. The problem though, guess what? So too
do most of the places in this country.
And that's why everyone's getting cancer. At least
one of the many reasons with the glyphosate,
with the PFAS, and all the different things
that they don't care about.
Right. We don't get to talk about this
a lot. It's important, and yet nobody likes
to hear about it, but let's keep going.
My skin has been red like a lobster.
Federal workers actually got sick while they were
surveying in East Palestine after that coronavirus. They
showed symptoms similar to what other people have
been talking about. I've been diagnosed. And CDC
got sick. EPA got sick. Multiple examples of
people in positions of power who had the
authority to shut this down got sick and
did nothing about it.
Could be because they had no power. Could
be because they didn't care. At the end
of the day, captured agencies, guys. That's where
we are. Doesn't seem to have changed even
slightly with the current administration. With asthma. I
have periodontal disease, and my teeth are falling
out. And that's just what I know of.
We sort of heard the messaging that everything
was fine at the Yeah. Let's go to
sixteen fifty.
It's worth your time watching this. It's a
good there's a good job on this.
Every step of the way,
we've had to fight. And that's what I
learned. No one's gonna fight for us. We
have to fight for ourselves. Mhmm. You know
how many poll And that is a message
that needs to be taken away from this,
guys.
Doesn't mean you shouldn't hope for people to
help or people in power that you have
the ability, but you have to realize that
in the especially when dealing with a government
structure, you it the only person coming to
save you is you.
That's something we only do embody.
Politicians I've talked to and how many promised
they were gonna help, we've had to fight.
And that's what I learned. No one's gonna
fight for us. We have to fight for
ourselves. Do you know how many politicians I've
talked to Mhmm. And how many promised they
were gonna help? I didn't give a shit
if you're Republican or Democrat. If you would
talk to us, we talk to you. Fast
forward, JD Vance gets elected vice president.
I've heard from none of them. Mhmm. We're
still Let that sink in a little bit.
Now that doesn't have to be a left
right paradigm thing, guys. It's just politicians
who who recognize an opportunity to use their
plight.
What they do? Biden's ruining this, and he
didn't help them. How dare he? How dare
the p not help the people of North
Carolina? How dare and then what are they
doing?
There's no real material change here, guys. Now
oh oh, I forgot. They are now conditioning
aid for those people on whether or not
they boycott Israel. Now we're gonna come back
to that. Now their update on the story
is that they they've removed it.
But from what I can tell, they've added
it back. We'll come back to that in
a second. So that's wild to me. Now
we'll get to that, and we'll check it
when we get there. But realize that that
is the interesting overlap to this. If you
haven't seen that, it's not new, by the
way, as we mentioned in the opening, but
they they're now talking about, you know, the
idea that you what is it called? Discriminatory
racial racism or something like that. The point
being, it very it literally lists Israel Israel
and Israeli companies and that they will not
get aid from your tax dollars if there's
a disaster, if they recognize you as boycotting
Israel, which, by the way, is your constitutional
right. But not any other country, not any
other government, just Israel, but America first. Right?
I think that's super important to think about.
And so when none of them are coming
back to help or back to the point
of being, you know, opportunism,
well, they did that because it was easy
to to look like you would be there
when Biden's not. And then your turn comes
around,
they're working they're I mean, let's put it
this way so it's not always partisan. The
US government
would rather work with Norfolk Southern over any
of us
because they get a benefit from that. There's
nothing but cost for us even though that's
what they claim they want to do, even
though it's their effing job.
The reality is they just have to put
out. So when they've Norfolk Norfolk is saying,
hey. We'll work with you. We'll give you
money. We'll over I mean, any number of
things you understand that works with, you know,
not just the executive branch, guys, all the
different multifaceted elements of government that could use
and benefit from inside connections to people like
that. Now that's just an overview. Who knows
what's really driving it? But at the end
of the day,
clearly, these people suffered. Norfolk Southern got away
with murder,
and god knows whatever else happened. Because remember,
there's a whole lot to the story just
like every other story sentence, it seems, that
never really gets finished.
They rushed it up. They patched it over.
They rode back over the stuff. They had
to dig it back up. They got that
train out as fast as they could before,
you know, exploding it, of course, despite the
fact fact that they didn't have to, despite
the fact that the evidence in court proved
they knew it was treated by no chloride,
then it was not likely to explode, but
they did it anyway.
Maybe it was an insurance scam. I don't
even know.
Sitting here sick. People are still suffering.
And where is he? At this point, you
see the corruption,
the lies from every one of our agencies.
Unless the president says we're gonna make this
right for these people, it'll never be, you
know, made right.
Yeah. And, you know, see, you can even
sense right there
a willingness to wanna support Trump, but her
point's the same. He didn't do that. Nobody
has. They've all pointed, been there. They've talked
to people. They're still suffering.
Nothing has changed.
In February,
Jamie wrote a letter to president Trump
calling on him to sign a major disaster
declaration
and to deliver universal health care for anyone
in East Palestine who needs it.
Uh-oh. There's a political con you know, universal
health care is kinda not their thing. Right?
I'm a Trump supporter,
but
he needs to make this right. Yep. Something
needs to be done. See, the problem is
that we're also hell bent on thinking there's
one the right side is gonna help us
or the right person
that we don't recognize that they're not in
the business of helping you. It's like think
of it like an insurance company, guys. They
do everything they can to not have to
do something for you.
That's how this stuff works. I'm sorry to
be a pessimist about it, but just look.
Look. It's not one it's not only one
side. That's how this the lens works. They
look back and they go, the Democrats are
always the one. No. It's your government is
always in that position. It's not my opinion.
Just look.
Until we can get beyond that left right
paradigm lie, we're always gonna be trapped, and
we don't see the full picture. Yeah. Something
needs to be done. We went through Biden
who didn't do anything. This is your chance
to come here and fix this. Mhmm. Didn't
happen. Not going to. Eighteen thirty five in
my opinion.
Last part. It became too much. I just
don't trust their results. Like, for your own
health, for your own sanity, you have to
step away from it.
It's a lot of weight for anyone to
carry.
And for one person that I knew, it
became too much.
I just don't trust their results.
We're all ending up sick, and they're telling
us it's safe, and everything's at a safe
level.
I spoke with Courtney Miller after my last
trip to East Palestine.
We texted back and forth about how she
was getting sick and wasn't getting the answers
or the help that she needed.
But we were never able to connect in
person.
That's because on 08/21/2024,
Courtney took her own life.
We paid a visit to her home, which
sits next to the tracks along the banks
of Sulphur Run, one of the most impacted
creeks in town.
I've spoken to Courtney's family. The wound is
still too fresh for them to talk about
on camera, but they gave me permission to
quote
their belief that Courtney's passing was 100%
related to the derailment.
For the people of East Palestine,
what happened on 02/03/2023
was a wound.
One they may be dealing with for the
rest of their lives.
For Norfolk Southern,
it was just another Friday. You're from this
area. Yeah. Yeah. It just kills me. You
know what killed me more than anything, guys?
Because we saw it
plain as day. We called it out. We
said what was going and I'm talking about
opinions at this point. Like, up until we
there's things that evolved, understanding treated vinyl chloride,
but it was very clear. Just like every
other story it seems since then where you
can clearly see, and I'm not I shouldn't
be so hyperbolic, but plenty of them where
you everyone can see what's going on. We're
not children. We recognize the criminal activity. We
recognize the way you're trying to cover things
up, and it just doesn't stop.
I recommend checking this out entirely.
I'll also include
for you guys to continue to look through.
One of these I argued two of the
most important of the episodes, but there's plenty
of them that go along this process. This
is the one I keep referencing from 2023.
Investigation found East Palestine
controlled burn,
in quotes, because it was by definition an
uncontrolled burn by every expert that understands that,
despite how that still doesn't get get stated,
was unnecessary.
The Norfolk lied to the volunteer fire chief
by telling him or rather omitting the fact
that he knew this is what came out
in court, that it was treated with vinyl
chloride, which means it was likely not to
explode regardless of the circumstances in regard to
what was happening, and they didn't tell him
that. In fact, they let him believe that
the pressure was so dangerous that he was
on the hook to make this choice. They
railroaded him. I believe that's the word even
used in court. The craziness about this is
that they knew they we then it came
out. It's public.
Nothing happened.
Nothing.
Now one crate on this one and this
one too, by the way. Up to 14,000
more dioxins in East Palestine homes compared to
controls. These are scientists doing this. Now the
Scott c Smith in this case. The crazy
thing, when you go back to this video,
as much as I do think it was
a good video,
guess what you will find in here?
Not a single mention of dioxin,
which I still find baffling. You understand that
even they were forced to admit that that
was, like, one of the primary issues. That
came up in the EPA briefings after they
pretended they didn't know what's happening, and then
they just ignored it. They just shut it
down, moved on. No one even brings it
up. That's not even and it's still not
mentioned. And crazy enough, in this documentary, they
use the term controlled burn. So this is
my problem with this stuff is that we're
still trapped.
Trapped every time in these conversations, and it
behooves us. It's on it's our responsibility as
individuals
to call it out,
if you care.
On other health points,
more perfect union put this out. Trump on
NBC on at CNBC this morning, this, I
believe, was yesterday, will be or it could've
been today. Not yet. Seven, nine hours ago
today.
We'll be putting an initial system
excuse me. Initial small tariffs on
pharmaceuticals.
Here's what he says.
And semiconductors.
But on pharmaceuticals,
we'll be putting a initially small tariff on
pharmaceuticals.
But in one year, one point five years
maximum,
it's going to go to 150%
and then it's going to go to 250%
because we want pharmaceuticals
made in our country. And that's not the
chip sack like Biden did because he didn't
know what he was doing where they gave
billions of dollars to companies that had more
money than they knew what to do with.
President Trump, can I ask you about
Right?
So that's pretty simple. Unless you're completely unless
you're still pretending, like, you don't under like,
unless we're still engaging with either the left
lie or the right lie. Like, the reality
of what this is you know, there are
aspects of this that can potentially benefit you
in the long run and sometimes it right
away, but it's a tax on you. At
the end of the day, that's what this
means. It increases, which we're already seeing. So
when this happens, it's not a benefit for
you. That it this it says, as I
wrote anyway, so much so much for cheaper
drugs.
Should you incorrectly think that's what you need
to be healthy, that's my opinion, of course,
Hashtag winning.
I just think it's insane. We can go
from
thirty seconds ago, like, that was a huge
thing. We're changing it for everybody, and then,
no. No. We're gonna increase it potentially by
250%.
Okay. So that's gonna be more expensive. Okay.
Got it. Got it. It just doesn't make
any sense,
unless it's just profiteering at your expense. Now
this is a very important element of this.
This is where the world
is. I was gonna say it's going. It
is going, but this is where the world
is and is continuing to drive in the
direction of. And this is about, you know,
everything we've talked about in this bigger field
of, like, genetic modification,
genetic editing,
you know, gene therapies,
genomics, and and and the kind of AI
drug direction. That's what this is all really
about. And the not just that even, but
also from the AI side of it and
the creating drug side of it using the
genomic information
to better create whatever they're trying to create,
including weapons and dual use, but also just
AI,
language model information. Like, they're using this in
so many different ways. But the one I
wanna focus on is the idea that we're
talking about a kind of wild west race
to the end to get as much of
the information they possibly can, whether it's Doge
and Elon Musk and his or or, you
know, whatever it is, as fast as they
can. Everyone seems to be rushing to absorb
as much data as possible
and what that then is being used for.
And
we see this happening. And so in this
case, if we recognize a company that clearly
is caught not just
failing to keep you safe, but lying about
even intending to do so,
how do you not read that as some
kind of a ploy?
Right? So Illumina Inc. Is to pay $9,800,000
to resolve false claims act
allegations arising from cybersecurity vulnerabilities and genomic sequencing
systems.
The point is, so their vulnerabilities
are their basically, their false claims around being
able to keep your personal genomic data secure,
and they failed.
So it says the settlement resolves allegations that
between February 2016 and September 2023, Illumina sold
government agencies' genomic sequencing systems that with software
that had cybersecurity
vulnerabilities.
And this is where I think it's important
to think about this exact thing happening and
everything Israel seems to touch. Everything Israel's involved
in and all the different, you know, solar
winds and all I mean, it's you know,
oopsie. It's something that Israel's touching, but it
was them. It was China. You know? It's
like, okay. Maybe. Or maybe it was exactly
what Israel builds into these things and pretends
to be other companies or pretends to be
other countries. I'm not saying I know every
single time, but that is a very, very
real and constant thing as well, again, in
a second, play the clip or actually,
you know, that would have been good here
too. Maybe I'll play it both times. The
clip of what the the pager discussion where
they say that we create fake companies and
we can do it anywhere in the world
and it's our stage. You know, that's the
way they see this, the Israeli government.
So the point
here is that the vulnerability could we should
consider very well been by design to scoop
this stuff up and not actually have anything
to stop them from accessing it. Or or
you can consider it from the side of
Illumina not being aware that they have backdoor
access from a company that they or a
rather
infrastructure they work with. You'll see what it
means as we go through it. So it
says,
had cybersecurity vulnerabilities without having an adequate security
program and sufficient quality systems to identify
and address those vulnerabilities. So, yeah, you could
always claim
incompetence.
As I always say, they would always rather
be seen as incompetent than criminal.
Excuse me. Specifically,
The United States contended that Illumina knowingly that's
what I find interesting, that they're claiming the
US government that they knowingly failed to incorporate
product cybersecurity in its software design, development, installation,
and on marketing
on market monitoring,
failed to properly support and resource personnel,
systems, and processes tasked with product security. Basically,
every aspect of it. Failed to adequately correct
design features that introduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the
genomic sequencing systems and falsely represented that the
software on the genomic sequencing systems adhered to
cybersecurity standards. This I don't how would you
possibly clearly, The US is saying they did
it on purpose, but I don't trust governments.
You shouldn't blindly take their word for anything.
But with that outline, and this does seem
to be what the what the information shows,
I don't know how you could argue that
is in any way an accident.
In every step of the way, it seems
like they made sure that this was not
or rather just vulnerable is the way to
put it.
And it goes on to say,
and falsely represented the software and the genomic
sequencing systems adhere to cybersecurity standards, including standards
of the International Organization for Standardization and National
Institute of Standards and Technology.
So if they're claiming it was knowingly,
how can you make sense of that? Why
would they knowingly keep it vulnerable backdoor or
rather just, you know, I see it that
way, but that's what I mean, that's what
it represents. But a vulnerability
in the supposed security around that very, very,
very valuable genomic data that they swore that
would never ever see the light of day
in the context of, you know, outside of
whatever your personal use was in the testing
and for your personal data, you know, '23
and me and the whole thing. Right?
So if obviously, then that would, to me,
suggest that they did that for if it's
knowingly,
to allow access to it. Because other well,
there's no other logical reason somebody would not
want would allow there to be a vulnerability
in something they promised they would be secure.
So go that's just my opinion, but you
tell me what you think. Come it says,
quote, companies that sell products to the federal
government will be held accountable, the federal government
says, for failing to adhere to cybersecurity standards
and protecting against cybersecurity risks. Okay.
So if the company is held accountable
for something that happened there, shouldn't it be
considered from the the investigatory team, the whether
or not that was their like, is it
their fault? Did they and if so if
it is, then why would they do that?
Like, it seems like a hollow investigation is
to be like, you're getting fined because you
did that. Why did they do that? And
who got access to it? Don't you think
these it's like the whole Epstein thing. It's
like we're just pointing to the surface level.
What about the team? What about the list?
What about the people involved? What about the
clients? Like, that's to me, I think that
speaks volumes.
And so it says,
Shumate of the injustice oh, no. Excuse me.
That that's the name. So it says,
failing to
standards and protecting
failing to adhere to cybersecurity standards and protecting
against cybersecurity risks, said assistant attorney general Brett
a Schumet of the justice department civil division.
Quote, this settlement underscores
the importance of cybersecurity in handling genetic information
and the department's commitment to ensuring that federal
contracts
contractors
adhere to requirements
to protect sensitive information from cyber threats.
Okay? And you failed. Right? And it's like
so here's the thing. Did they just take
their word for it? Right? Like, the idea
is that you said you were secure. They
didn't really care even seem to feign or
even try other than saying it to have
the security,
and you're now going, well, now we're gonna
hold you accountable. Well, clearly, you're not doing
that. Clearly, you are reactive.
Oh, you failed. Okay. Now you're in trouble.
Well, that's not what people want for you.
I'm not saying I want them involved at
all. I'm just saying from the logic of
what they claim, then they should be doing
their job if that's what they you see
what I'm saying? It seems to be backward.
But it says this settlement
demonstrates our continuing commitment to combat cybersecurity
risks by ensuring that federal contractors protect private
and sensitive government information.
Or I mean, when's the last time your
government cares about that? They sell you out
every every turn possible.
Okay.
So that's simple enough. Illumina Inc.
Lied or in or I guess just spectacularly
failed, and the US government thinks that was
on purpose.
First,
one of their main locations is in Tel
Aviv, but that doesn't have to
it's not earth shattering. That's they're they're a
major hub in regard to the biotech field,
which concerns me, or the technology
or, you know, weapons manufacturing or rather just,
you know, invest or, you know, research.
But that's the first part.
The one I thought was most interesting is
right in the midst of the COVID nineteen
illusion, Illumina made a massive partnership with the
Israeli Ministry of Health,
to pilot genomic sequencing for diagnostic
critically ill infants.
Diagnosing critically ill infants. Okay. So then now
you have a partnership. You have the Israeli
Ministry of Health, their government
overlapped with Illumina in regard to this massive
genomic sequencing
effort.
And and so okay. So a group that's
just almost constantly being caught for backdoor cyber
manipulation, Israel, constantly happening,
has
agreement with them for genomic information. Not not
that they always have access to everything, but
the research. Right? So my point is, if
you're thinking about who might be manipulating this,
Israel is known for creating backdoors to do
something like that. And the it continue overlaps
seem to make sense.
This is what it said. Let me just
really quickly. Illumina and Israel's Ministry Of Health
on Wednesday announced a pilot program to implement
the use of whole genomic sequencing for diagnosing
critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care who
are suspected of having a genetic disorder. And
then she goes on to give you the
more information around it. Now the the major
point is always is this is just, you
know, the if there was nothing to suggest
a connection,
then going, I wonder if Israel did that
is what I criticize in the nation of
alternative media. This is simply
connections to Israel or rather a group that's
like a known suspect. It's like the usual
suspects of people that are creating cybercrimes,
and they happen to be involved, and they
happen to be obsessing with genetic information. So
to me, that feels like there's something to
be considered there.
What was this one? Oh, that's right. DNA
sequencing giant Illumina to establish center of excellence
in Israel.
This is 2022.
All throughout the COVID nineteen issue, which remember,
all the swabbing they didn't need to do,
there was a there was a massive grab
of of genetic information.
Now Illumina, the world's leading DNA sequencing company,
worth an estimated $51,000,000,000,
has announced that it will be establishing so,
again, you know, here's 10 here's a $10,000,000
fine. Like, they don't care about that. An
excellent center in Israel for the
advancement and development of artificial intelligence to provide
scalable and highly accurate streamlined solutions that dramatically
shorten
interpretation time
of analysis, of genome genomic analysis in particular.
But AI, it's the same direction we're talking
about. It all seems to be AI, medicine,
drugs, telemedicine,
AI driven evaluation
towards all going.
Led by led by,
Enad Medster in Israel. Their presence in Tel
Aviv will focus on AI driven interpretation technology.
Oh, and then this is just the, tweet
they put out in 06/14/2022.
Did you know that by 2024, genomic data
is expected to reach 20 exabytes, which is
just crazy?
Clinical researchers in Israel have been working with,
a Medgene,
now an Illumina company, so they're, like, absorbing
other companies, which is kinda how this tends
to work. Right? Where you can have this
sort of, like, like, hypothetically speaking, let's say
this is a company that's been, like, infiltrated
by foreign power or by Israel or by
anybody.
The point is about what Israel's efforts tend
to do. Well, then they sort of absorb
this company. Now there are two steps removed.
You see how that works? And this is,
again, public information about what they do, whether
that's happening here, that's for you to decide,
to develop AI driven interpretation tech and shorten
diagnostic
odysseys for patients. So it's really just showing
you that the AI driven direction was always
where this was going, which we kinda knew
at the time. AI drives data insights for
doctors and their patients.
This is open secrets in regard I just
thought there's an interesting overlap. So Illumina Inc.
Does a hell of a lot of lobbying.
So you can look at that as just
the biotech direction, but if you can think
of it in a way that is you
know, what I'm trying to paint is because
today, the end point is gonna be largely
about Israeli infiltration of this country. Sort of
kind of the overlap to start in the
way is that if you see them utilizing
these kind of a opaque networks, it's worth
considering whether this massive lobbying from this company,
which they would do, by the way, likely
anyway, as a $51,000,000,000
massive biotech company.
But the overlap there, it's worth considering that.
But the point is simply point saying in
2022,
9.3, almost $9,400,000
in lobbying
politicians,
peak of it in 2022.
And then in 2025,
this year, already $2,000,000,
63
lobbyists.
I just think that's it's just it seems
like a lot going on there. So more
more to consider on what might be happening.
Oh, that's the same one.
And then this was their don't the list
of donors or of the people they're lobbying
onto. Again, basically, the people they're bribing is
the way I look at it. Well, guess
what? Kamala Harris, Mike Johnson, DNC, RNC.
Perfect.
Red and blue,
your government, how that tends to work.
Now on an overlapping point, this is from,
the July 25.
Microsoft admits it cannot guarantee data sovereignty. Now
I think we already actually showed you this
in a previous show. My point is to
overlap this first broad point
that this is just always the case. Whether
they claim they these I don't think they're
even truly interested in keeping your data safe
or if it ever really has been.
It's when it gets to some point, we
look back and go, oh, looks like they
were all doing that. Looks like they were
all using it. You know, whether it's the
police department using facial recognition to spy on
their girlfriends or, you know, or it's this
and and your personal data from '23 andMe
or anywhere else being sold to the highest
bidder or France and COVID data. It happens
every time.
So that's the first point to this. You
just don't think any of this stuff is
ever safe when you're handing it off to
a third party.
But on top of that, same overlap, Microsoft
is, of all companies,
incredibly like, it is immersed with Israel
From the top down, from where it's located,
from who's it it's that's important to think
about. So overlapping the same conversation, the access
to data, I think, is monumentally important.
Now on a overlap to this that I
think is important,
state department crimes, I'm not familiar, saw this
today,
says it's almost a year, and this is
just a health overlap, almost a year since
we published our article, Israeli bioterrorism
and UN's complicity.
Here's an update from doctor Angela. It says
between June and July 2025
I can just read from her post, actually.
Gaza recorded a sudden spike in Ghionn Bari
syndrome.
The rare this rare autoimmune disease attacks the
nervous system and can lead to paralysis and
so on, Saying the, gods that typically sees
four to five cases a year. There have
been at least ninety five in this summer
alone. Now do you remember what just happened?
Doesn't have to be the it could just
be coincidence,
correlation,
but they sure as health
rushed in a ton of those polio shots.
And that is one of the obvious and
look back through the history of those shots
themselves.
Now I'm of the mind that there was
more going on in the very beginning, like
we said. I don't they're why would they
be starving into death, shooting them where they
can, poisoning their food, poisoning their water, and
then come out and try to, you know
well, you could argue that that's the whole
point because they weren't designed to help them
and that those things are dangerous. But in
the mindset of if that was the case
or you disagree with that, then why would
they have done that? Because I think there's
more going on in every case. I think
it's experimentation, whether that's even what they gave
them. I don't know. And that's not hypothetical,
guys. Look in the past of what they've
done. They've been caught left and right every
other weekend for doing stuff like this to
the Palestinians.
But I think just to me that point
alone, I think is just the the real
it's it's it's it's interesting to me that
this is where
the the correlation
doesn't prove it, but it's striking and it's
all the time. When you look back, you
know, I just take a look at the
correlation of the of the rise in these
kind of illnesses with the rise of the
childhood schedule, and it's pretty hard to miss.
Now over that,
Palantir Panopticon and Trump's new big tech led
private health tracking system, where I took we,
basically, this was the show where I did
the opening around that because it happened after
the interview, but then played my interview with
seven seas where we talk about all this.
But how interesting it is to have that
come out? That you're gonna work with Amazon
and Google and Microsoft and open AI to
track your public health data?
I mean, doesn't this all come back around
to the same point? And doesn't now Israel
have complete access
to the a they have an AI partnership,
and the AI is accessing all of your
data through this government? This is not hard
to piece together.
It's right in front of you. And yet
people still just don't wanna accept it because
I get it. It's crazy.
But we're here. You can prove it. So
it's interesting to think about how all that
comes together as there's data leaks, and I
don't think I mean, I think at this
point, it's just we're starting to see the
real picture.
One over what and I kind of just
didn't know where to fit this in, but
it's important, I I think, in the sense
that I mean, you already know this, to
be honest, but
the RFK Maha connection
and the reality of, you know, where it's
all going and the the concern like, what
what makes sense of what RFK is doing
today? For those that truly have followed his
work and are now just baffled by what
the hell is happening in front of you.
This, I think, is interesting
because, one, it it adds to what we
already know. He's the other clips of him
calling Trump an idiot and JD Vance calling
Trump a moron and Rubio calling him a
clown. It they all of them, it seems,
and vice versa, by the way. But this
is another one that I hadn't seen. And
this even according to Grok, apparently, this was
Kathleen asked, apparently, and it was, at least
according to them and in my own research,
the same that this was in fact a,
you know, an RFK Jew. Because it almost
when I first heard of that, it sounded
like almost like something that people would make
even because of the words they use. But
as it says here, and and, again, just
looking for yourself, this date was made March
2016 on his Ring of Fire radio show,
praising a critique
that likened Trump to Hitler and described his
supporters, Trump supporters, as belligerent idiots, outright Nazis,
cowards, bootlickers.
And now he's working with him. I just
think that's interesting.
You know, one of the things that you
you you I you have you write so
beautifully, and I you know, your stuff is
so fun to read, but you write about
Trump.
Well, the way that you build a truly
vicious nationalist movement is to wed a relatively
small core of belligerent idiots to a much
larger group of opportunists and spineless fellow travelers
whose But that's a good point though, isn't
it? Because that is what happens left and
right.
I believe that's what we're seeing, left and
right. Primary function is to turn a blind
eye to things. Movement is to wed a
relatively small core of belligerent idiots to a
much larger group of opportunists and spineless fellow
travelers whose primary function is to turn a
blind eye to things.
We may not have that many outright Nazis
in America, but we have plenty of cowards
and boot lickers. And once those fleshy dominoes
start tumbling into the Trump camp, the game
is up.
When you talk about fleshy dominoes, Chris Christie
comes to mind. Yeah. Exactly.
Now, you know, for me, it's just because
his voice definitely sounds different today. It's gotten
better. Right? But, apparently, that is real.
But it shouldn't surprise you. I mean, they
they attack each other left and right, but
just how do you make sense of that?
My what I tweeted about it was, and
then he went on to join the team.
Like, how do you make sense of that?
Now, again, when I do that, I'm never,
like, actually, it's more rhetorical so people understand.
I have my own opinions about it, but
it's it's it's more just, like, ask that
question. Right?
Why then did he join this team? What
do you think about that? Because it obviously
doesn't line up, but there's plenty of things
to consider. There's you know, with that kind
of thing, it's just that you could theorize
in 75 different ways. Clearly, though, it doesn't
make sense, and it's worth noting that. You
know, it's like, what could possibly happen where
that kind of opinion just goes, oh, wait.
Never mind. Everything's different than what I thought
before. All the people you see and what
your opinions are, I mean, that doesn't make
sense. So either he decided to try to
make a change from within, which clearly isn't
working, or that was never real in the
first place, which I don't believe with because
I think his work helps it's still the
past work still helps people.
So there's a couple anomalies in there you
can think for yourself, but I think it's
very strange. And to bring this into the
Epstein conversation, which obviously connects. Right? I mean,
not just because it's the government that's crawling
currently drowning in their own kind of psyops
around the information around this, but the overlap
to the Israel influence to it, the in
the the to the endpoint, to Israel infiltration
of this country and their blackmail network. I
mean, it's all very relevant right now. So
this is important to understand. So you so
far,
we've seen the the limited immunity that was
gained before they had the conversation, which I
think is already too far. I think that's
insane. This person should not be given any
any she's already been found guilty of human
trafficking. Think about how crazy that is, the
people that are most primed
and just conservatives
because of the Trump and QAnon and all
of it to go, which rightly so, care
about human trafficking and pedophilia and in government.
And then
are or, I guess, just kind of I
guess, let's see. It's hard to say because
it's I think a lot of Trump supporters
are very much calling this out. It's hard
to see where that line is, but the
ones that aren't are suddenly just like, oh,
yeah. You know, give her a deal so
we can find the next ones. She's a
human trafficker. She's involved with the you know,
that's at least that's what the evidence shows.
Seems like a weird thing to do. But
So she's got got limited immunity from whatever
she divulges in that conversation.
So what if she admits
everything
about what she did? No. You know? And
so now she's not gonna get held accountable.
Are you okay with that?
Especially if you don't ever see anything else
happen, you know, they'll float a whole lot
of claims and we might you know, coming
down the line, we're gonna be going after
them and after them, and then nothing happens.
How often does that pass? But then we
had the point where she's now saying she
wants immunity. Right? She wants a part of
her, you know, immunity, pardon.
Rather I think she see used the term
immunity
in her in before she testifies. And if
she doesn't get that, then she's gonna plead
the fifth. That's the whole claim.
Now it seems as if the Supreme Court
has already denied or it suggested they deny
or, excuse me, the government has suggested they
deny in their in their document,
her her appeal, but I don't think it's
happened yet. So we'll go over some of
this update. This is the ABC News report.
Grand jury transcripts in Ghislaine Maxwell
case contain nothing new. Now there's two things
to this.
Well, well, technically, that's the next one. There's
this one is about the or this one
here.
We'll come back to it. There's a recording
from their recent interviews we're gonna talk about
too. The so this is just about the
the claim. Right? So Trump's goes, we're gonna
unseal all the transcripts from, you know, acting
like that's gonna solve it. So, again, there's
a part I missed in there, which you're
all not you're all familiar with, that this
kinda blew up in their face.
Right? It went from a hoax to your
weaklings if you care about it too. But
Obama's the one no. Clinton's in the thing
that I just said was fake. You know?
But it's it's just none of it adds
up. And I think more than anybody, conservatives
are calling this out. I mean, it's weird,
but that's what I see. We're gonna maybe
that's just what Twitter is today. But
to call that fake is just wild to
me. After the whole rising effort of their
side to make it a you know, it
just seems like a weird deviation. But I
think it was they don't expect it to
like, they people would just go along with
whatever direction you pointed him.
It's weird. Old red thing blew up in
the
top. And so okay. So but the point
ultimately comes down to the fact that
she tried to make this deal with Trump,
tried to get something to happen. And now,
ultimately,
because it all didn't go the way or
rather before that, because it didn't go the
way that the Trump supporters wanted, the Trump
team wanted,
and everybody kept asking for the list. They
claimed it exist. We see track you know,
all this stuff's been going. He says, we're
gonna release the transcripts, which the point becomes
there's nothing new, which is what most of
us were probably already saying. Now I don't
know for sure
that there's something in there that we don't
know about, but it doesn't make logical sense.
Why would this have anything new in my
opinion? Or, I mean, that's my opinion. But
why would everything new?
It's stuff that we've already talked about. It's
stuff that's already been discussed, which is ultimately
what's what it says here. But this is
what we were saying before. Much of what
the justice department wants a federal judge to
unseal from Maxwell's grand jury investigation is already
known. And at least so far, the attorney
general is seeking to unseal nothing else. So
on top of that, it's like they're only
selectively doing so. Like, where this this should
be more than anybody conservatives at the top
of their lungs going, release
the information. Nothing else matters at this point
because you have made this your hill to
die on. And if you keep trying to
push us off the hill, we shouldn't believe
in you. We shouldn't believe we shouldn't trust
any of them. But if they're not unsealing
everything, then clearly this is a selective game.
The justice department turned over a version of
the Maxwell grand jury transcript that identifies which
information is not already publicly known. That anointed
version shows that, quote, much of the information
provided during the course of the grand jury
testimony, with the exception of the identities of
certain victims and witnesses, was made public available
at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported
through public statements of victims and witnesses.
So it's just it's a it's an exercise
of futility.
You're and, watch, they put that out, and
the Johnsons of the world are gonna act
like it just changed everything even though it's
already out there. They did the same thing
with the JFK files. Didn't really change anything.
The just department is asking two federal judges
in New Mac or in New York to
unseal the grand jury transcripts
in the Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein cases.
It is not asking the judges to unseal
the grand jury exhibits.
Though the attorney general asked for several more
days to consider, quote, its position with respect
to unsealing of the grand jury exhibits.
So it's just everything right now seems to
be very selective and, like, almost with the
intention of if they just drip one more
piece out, will that be enough to pacify
you? That's what I can't stop feeling in
all of this.
Politico writes, and this is, from the from
today.
She's saying Maxwell doesn't want grand jury materials
in her case unsealed. Now whether that's the
truth or not or that she's just playing
in to the the you know, I it's
hard to tell. But it says, Jacislaine Maxwell
told a federal judge Tuesday that she opposes
the justice department's effort to unseal grand jury
transcripts in her case, which she described in
court papers as a broad intrusion into grand
jury secrecy.
Maxwell said she opposes the unsealing largely because
she is appealing her twenty twenty one conviction
on sex trafficking charges for aiding and participating
in the sexual abuse of minors by her
onetime boyfriend boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein.
Now in the which I have right here,
which we'll get to,
in the
US government document in regard to Ghislaine Maxwell,
where they request the denial.
Where is I going? The,
oh, yeah. So the the claim that they're
saying that basically
the that they're what they're requesting is that
because
the Epstein,
sweetheart deal, they're claiming that somehow gave them
all immunity. There was no, you know, immunity
from prosecution, and they went after anyway.
And and in the rep the US government,
you know, what do you call it? You
know, what the document they presented,
it it denies that. It says that's not
true, and here's why. What what's interesting to
me,
why is this only happening now?
Right? So if she's been in jail this
whole time, why does it why why does
it and and that's been the case this
entire time. Why didn't they
wouldn't they immediately be rushing into the fact
that, wait. We had a non prosecution agreement.
I mean, unless I'm missing something that seems
like a weird gap of time and only
they only jump up to make this start
happening when this starts going on and when
Donald Trump says it's all a hoax.
So, I mean, I still feel, like I
said before, that there's more to that story
than anything, that there's an opening there to
argue that you can't call this a hoax
from the highest level of power and then
still have me in jail based on that
claim of a what you claim as a
hoax. Either way, that feels like a weird
statement. Now what they discussed behind the scenes
with top Blanche and everybody else, there's I
think there's a whole other story going on.
I think it's quite obvious, really, when you
look at they gave her a box full
of materials, they claim she's saying on a
100 different people, nothing's really happening.
Maybe it happened tomorrow. But I get the
sense this will continue to drift in a
direction of hoping we forget about this, and
Maxwell made some kind of agreement that she'll
eventually benefit from. That's what I sense in
all of this. But so the point was
again,
that she doesn't want unsealed because she's claiming
that this this she's trying to appeal the
conviction.
Quote, given that she is actively litigating her
case and does not know what is in
the grand jury record, which seems odd, she
has no choice but to respectfully oppose the
government's motion to unseal it, said her lawyers.
Okay. But that so what so at what
point if let's just say, even though the
argument is it's largely stuff we already know,
if not all, she says, don't unseal it
because I'm appealing, and that appeal never happens,
and they oblige for some reason. Like, you
can see a point in which we've got
a lot of movement and nothing actually happens.
You see how often that happens with the
US government in particular?
The justice department requested
the unsealing in both the Maxwell and Epstein
cases as a way to fend off as
political rights, I dig I agree, fend off
from fierce criticism from Donald Trump's base after
the administration decided against releasing the so called
Epstein files.
Now remember,
nobody honest in this is not necessarily it
could be, but necessarily claiming it's like one
list and one thing. But rather in in
regarding the list, just the access the information
that they have on who they worked with,
Not hard to understand. But they try to
they'll give you some kind of a head
fake and act like, well, there was no
one list. Okay. Fine. Then you make the
list and give us the names. But it's
clear they don't wanna do that for obvious
reasons, I would argue.
But it says,
as part of that effort to quell the
backlash,
a top justice department official also interviewed Maxwell,
who is serving a twenty year prison sentence
over the course of two days late last
month.
So,
again, if nothing comes of that, we really
need to ask ourselves what went down right
there. And okay. So she's saying about a
100 people and Jones made that like it
was gonna shatter the earth.
What's going on? Now, again, I know it.
The these especially with this,
they need to investigate. It could take a
long time. You know? So how long do
we wait? Do we give it a couple
years until we find out? You know, it's
like, I think that's where this is going
personally.
And it says, those steps, however, have been
seen as largely futile. You know, whatever they're
trying to do, everything listed off is not
really being bought by his own base despite
him framing it otherwise, which I think even
makes it more obvious. The grand jury transcripts
represent only a tiny fraction of the investigative
files. That's important to listen to. So they're
not they're really giving you a tiny fraction
of what might be shown and as the
justice department said, contain mostly public information. The
justice department has also said that Maxwell isn't
a credible witness. Now that very well could
just be trying to undermine what she has
to say about them and everybody.
And who knows what actually gets tied back
to this? This is interesting. This is Glenn
Beck
talking with I kept my underwear on Dershowitz,
which is just a weird that what he
does here is every time I see this
guy, he's increasingly he gives me the increasing
impression of more desperation, more like, his arguments
are not, like well, I guess the way
to say it, not befitting of a lawyer.
Not I don't mean that as a compliment.
You know, that what he's doing, he knows
better. In regard to from a legal perspective.
Like, the what he argues there is I'll
I'll let it speak for itself. Shannon Joyce
says, wow. Glenn Beck featuring Dershowitz, probably on
the list, to launder Jeffrey Epstein's character in
an attempt to rewrite history.
Running cover for sex traffickers? Are you buying
this? Here's what he said. Here's what Alan
Dershowitz had to say. Look. Let me make
two points that will be very controversial, and
you may disagree with them completely.
Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile.
That term has a specific meaning. It means
people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent
girls or boys. Now I I I brought
this up on, I think, Aim Wake up
the other day. It's not an invalid point.
It doesn't mean he's not a monster. It
doesn't mean he's not a a sexual predator
or even a pedophile that we can't, you
know, necessarily prove. The point, though, is that
I did also find it strange
that the entirety of, like, the corporate media
started calling him a pedophile and sex despite
the fact that they were the ones calling
us crazy for years
until it's, like, on a dime, it just
they accepted the narrative, which in fact is,
as he's pointing out, not even technically the
accurate terms to be using for what they're
doing. Doesn't that show you some kind of
a weird
game that now that now Dershowitz is trying
to use to run cover for his per
you know, his client
and and everything else he works alongside and
for and with and ideologically and everything.
But my point though is that that's interesting
because it shows some level of coordination
even even like which, yes, it's not that
crazy, a coordination in dishonesty.
But even though, again, the main point is
I find it almost impossible to believe that
that's not what was also going on and
that there is actually evidence of exactly that
going on around all of this, but whether
that's exactly what he was facilitating. You know,
there there's legal challenges to proving those things,
but the reality is what this was and
what it ties back to, I mean, it's
not that far. I mean, frankly, I've this
I'm that's why I don't balk at it.
But
the point of the people you can point
to who they claim are victims are not.
They're, you know, six as he points out,
sixteen, seventeen. So I find that very interesting,
but I also find it very disgusting that
Alan is trying to use that as a
way to sort of claim that Maxwell was
not a criminal, which is really where this
is going. And on top of that, he
goes on to make the point
about,
not being a part of Assad, which is
really what stands out to me. It's just
I mean, also, I mean, there's many examples.
Acosta is only one of them of of
claiming that he worked for a foreign intelligence.
And the other people above him said back
off, that's why. And so for Alan to
push that, this feels like all the more
obvious. But I do think it's worth considering
that point about the terminology used and why
all of a sudden as in lockstep,
they all start I think there's a reason
to make it. You know,
there's a lot of ways you can consider
it. But
when that happens from a a group that
is almost always trying to manipulate you for
whatever reason, whether they see it or not,
it speaks volumes about what they may be
trying to do. Maybe it's about trying to
set some kind of a narrative around it
that doesn't actually align with the fact that
we have, even if it's the reality of
the background. Worth considering, isn't it? But, you
know, Alan Dershowitz just creeps me out.
Prepubescent
girls or boys. That is 11, 12 years
old. That's the definition
of all psychiatrists and of the law.
Epstein was interested in 16 year olds, 17
year olds, 18 year olds.
Okay. So you knew that?
Okay. So are you are you pretending that
you just discovered this through the files that
have come out? Like, this guy worked for
him. You understand? And so it's like the
idea is that you're now just kind of
casual letting it out that you knew he
was a sexual pervert, you knew he was
a a rapist and, you know, sat statutory
or otherwise. I mean, it's just that's very
weird to me that this guy continues to
be put in front of people as some
kind of a credible witness around somebody he
clearly defended. And whether you're look. You know,
for frankly, in my opinion,
I don't care whether it's your job as
a lawyer. If I was a lawyer, I
would not defend people like Epstein. Period. Now
you may think I'm naive or you may
think that's just not I that's just I
would that's a line for me. It's just
like the line that I don't care how
much it benefited me. I wouldn't support Israel
and the genocide. Right? So I think it's
so my point in saying that is that
I don't think claiming you're a lawyer is
a a good enough excuse to justify working
for a monster like that. But my point
on top of it is that I think
he, you know,
has been very clearly aware of this to
the point where I mean, he went to
the island for crying out loud, says he
just didn't he had his underwear on when
he got a massage.
That was his actually his argument. That's why
I I call him that when I talk
about him. He was a bad person, did
terrible, terrible things. The word pedophile is not
a correct description.
Very brave of you, Alan, to call him
doing bad things. You're very brave. You know?
A lot of people coming out, like, now
they're the ones breaking the story. You know,
this guy was defending him
well into the reality that everyone was seeing
what he was. Of what he was. Number
two, he was not a trafficker. Traffickers make
money
by selling and enslaving girls. What he did
is he was a selfish guy who was
having sex with all these,
sexual contact, at least, with all these 16,
17 year olds, and maybe maybe lending them
to people like prince Andrew. We don't
Oh my god. So even just taking a
statement at face value.
So lending a girl to a prince is
not considered trafficking when you're gonna try to
scream that a guy taking his children on
a work job across state lines is human
trafficking, Bondi and Nome. I mean, it's just
insane.
But the reality is
even if you wanna claim that he wasn't
selling these things, like, what see, this is
my point of a lawyer. Like, that that's
actually a legal argument if you wanna break
it down because the reality would be that
so what if he's working for somebody who
is the one doing the selling?
Like, a network that he worked for a
foreign intelligence apparatus. Right? The idea to claim
that he wasn't trafficking because he just wasn't
doing that, but or even more so that
you you can't prove that he was selling
them.
Isn't that what I mean, Maxwell is in
prison. I mean, it's just this is a
very disingenuous argument for a thousand reasons. The
point is that Alan Dershowitz and Glenn Beck
are putting on their little dance here to
basically gaslight you around
Maxwell in particular.
I think that's where this is going. I'll
play the Newsmax clip in again in a
second. They're trying to paint you a picture
of her being a victim right now. I
get the sense where that's all where all
this is going.
No. For sure. But he was not a
trafficker in the true sense of the word.
That's why there's no client list. There were
no clients.
And the other because there was no
there was no money being Okay.
Oh, that's what I mean. Yeah. Great great
pushback. That great great investigatory question. Right? I
mean, come on, guys.
You're you I mean, look. He just his
opinion. He's floating this. You have no idea
how to back. And the point would be,
though, if you're gonna talk about trafficking and
claim that's the only reason that's not trafficking,
I could think of 17 questions that would
be valid to ask on top of that
like the one I just put forward. Like,
what about the people he's working alongside? What
if they were you know, the the bottom
line is that what he's doing is human
trafficking. And the idea from a legal perspective
that there needs to be some kind of
exchange,
well, how do we know what they're exchanging?
It doesn't have to be money, you understand?
And clearly, we can see that there was
information change exchange. There was influence exchange in
the sense of power, you know, and and
given access.
All of this stuff is very obvious.
You don't think Allen knows that? See, he
and so on top of making the legal
argument, he's well, I should just say, as
a lawyer, he's making a legal argument to
defend something he knows is a detestable crime.
I don't know how you see beyond that.
But let's be honest. I think we all
recognize what this person is. I think his
character speaks for itself, a lack thereof. Yeah.
And the other he didn't work for the
Mossad.
I know that because
I debriefed him when I was trying to
make a deal for him back in 02/1967,
and he would have told me Oh, okay.
If he had a deal if he was
working for the government because it would have
helped him get a get a clear,
better deal. Of course. Because Alan wouldn't lie.
Right? That's not possible that he wouldn't lie
or rather maybe even rationalize
from some lawyer obligation to not divulge that.
But the bottom line is
he didn't tell you that? That's how you
know that? You see my point? This these
people aren't that stupid. You know, as anybody
else knows, that your statement should be, for
especially as a lawyer, that
I
what would be the right way to frame
that? That I have no indication that was
the case. Not that you know that
because clearly, him not telling you that does
not then prove it didn't happen.
But you guys all know this. This is
just again, this this is Beck and the
rest of them just doing, you know, keep
that's my opinion anyway. Alan Dershowitz in particular,
continuing
to try to gaslight you around what's going
on because I think there's an interest in
keeping this,
you know,
I guess, stuck in the mud where it
currently is.
David Icke, Bloomberg reports the FBI redacted president
Trump's name, which we already know, but this
is a little bit of an addition to
the story, as well as the names of
other prominent public figures from the Epstein files
under privacy exemptions.
Bloomberg.
David Eich says, I have lived a long
time, but this has to be one of
the most blatant
cover ups played out in public that I
have ever seen.
He's that's I I agree. I mean, I
I I honestly don't know of anything I've
ever seen like this, that it's just like
it's it's like you know, like he's like
he say, it's a cover up
in front of you. It's like he's shaking
a blanket over the top, and he's like,
do look over there. You know, it's like,
this is not what it looks like. Go
go look over there. They look at the
Democrats. You know? It's like it just it
feels really, really silly.
Now media reports Trump's name redacted from Epstein
files.
Bloomberg reported on Friday that president Donald Trump
in case you're wondering, by the way, that
these I've it very well could have gone
like the Bloomberg report, but what I tend
to do is report from whatever pops up
that I see first, whether that's through the
the news app, which will give me all
of them or somebody shares it with me.
I think it's important to whether it's a,
you know, an outlet that is more viable
or more respected than others, I try to
do my best to point to the thing
I see it first on. And then if
I don't like it, I'll I'll, you know,
say that when I point to it. But
or people that share it on Twitter. You
know, some personal 15 followers, you know, that
I see it from. You you're damn right
they deserve credit for that, you know. But
so many in the mainstream alternative media, the
majority in my opinion, will just siphon for
this. Grab from them, never point to it,
you know, and just and just can you
step on them and use them. That's the
point is why I'm not familiar that familiar.
Excuse me. Newsbreak seems to point to them,
and I just wanted to point out that
that's why I'm not familiar with the platform,
but there's a lot of them. Like, that
one and I think Raw Story seems to
pop up in theirs too, but it's it's
kind of a multifaceted. That's why I like
the app because it kinda, like, just dumps
things in front of you and you couldn't
decide for yourself. Anyway, I've I've never mentioned
that. So back to the point. Bloomberg reported
on Friday that president Trump was among those
whose names were redacted from Epstein documents, which
we already know, citing multiple people familiar with
the matter. Now, what's interesting is that on
that point,
I think what was it? Twenty fifth, I
think. Right?
Right after that, when it became clear
that it the report I'm looking back, by
the way, because that's we're looking back. We
can see that that was the day he
was informed by Bondi that your name's popping
up all over these things, which I objectively,
that doesn't prove he's committing a crime. We're
not talking about the some kind of a
list of of,
clients. We're talking about just the files and,
you know, whether he knew him, which we
know he did. He's got 17 pictures with
him or however many you can there's a
lot of them. It's clear he knew him,
and it's very clear that he was friends
with him despite the narrative. It's clear that
he hung out with him. Jeffrey Epstein called
him one of his closest friends for ten
years. It's very clear, but that doesn't prove
that he committed a crime, at least not
at the moment. So my my the point
where was I going with that?
Oh, is it so she came to him
and said, hey. You know, your your name
is all over the list. So I think
whether it's because he did commit crimes or
whether he just recognized that wouldn't look good,
he decided to be dishonest about it. He
decided to hide it, which doesn't speak well
for whether he broke the law. And so
my point is from that point forward is
when we started to see it's a hoax.
Obama and the Clintons, the Democrats did it
all, which says a lot. Doesn't mean it's
false, but it sure flavors the conversation. Now
it says FBI Freedom of Information Act team
conducted a final review.
The team was reportedly tasked with redacting the
name of Trump, a former friend of Epstein,
and other prominent figures. Now who are they?
Why are we redacting people's names
if this isn't some kind of a victim
discussion? Like, that's the real point here. We
already knew the name came up,
but not that it was being redacted, right,
that Trump's name was
there. Now we're finding out that they have
they've redacted people's names, probably him and his
friends and people
that's pretty obvious to me. Now if he
comes out and addresses this, they damn well
better be able to show you what they've
done, but I doubt that'll happen. So they
by because of their own interest, they've removed
their names from this. How does that not
speak exactly? That shows dishonesty,
period.
That shows you they're hiding something, even if
it's just that their names are on the
list
or, you know, the files. The the the
final review occurred before the release of the
Department of Justice FBI memo determining Epstein committed
suicide according to Bongino and Cash because they
saw the file and they know even though
every single data point points to the opposite
including the autopsy report. But, you know, but,
you know, they know. They saw.
And that further disclosure of the files was
not warranted,
setting off a mega firestorm, rightly so. As
Leopold noted in the report, Trump was a
private citizen during the investigation into Epstein and,
therefore, is entitled to privacy on the matter.
Woah. That is not even remotely the same
thing as you having a private we don't
you know, you don't you're not obligated to
tell us what happened and what you know
and what you've been a part of. But
if your name is in a in a
file,
that's not the same. So so you're telling
me that you by that same logic, you
should black out literally everybody's name who is
who is
not in the government?
How in the world does that make sense?
That would that means your privacy is more
important than whether or not you're committing crimes?
I think this is very interesting. Now to
be clear, your privacy is damn near paramount.
But the point is we're talking about an
investigation to crimes
and not whether Joe at the coroner used
to look at this and know what's going
on, but whether the government gets to investigate
and go after those names if they've committed
crimes, not whether the government blacks it out,
hides it from every view. I'm not necessarily
saying that everybody in the world has a
right to see every single I mean, technically,
see, this is the hard line. What I'm
talking about is
the the information around this should be made
public entirely.
But I there is a fair point to
be made about personal information around victims. Now
I frankly think that's being
very abused. I think that's being manipulated for
the interest of them keeping a lot of
the secret, but I'm not gonna claim that
that point is not valid because it really
is. Especially with what so many of them
have gone through for so long, both from
the government and, you know, everything else.
But I think it's you know, that's worth
considering. But it's as much as what has
been written about Trump's former friendship with Epstein,
though his name appearing in the files does
not necessarily point to him being guilty, which
I do think is important.
Now this is a the recording of the
meetings with Blanche.
Bombshell recording of Ghislaine Maxwell interview could be
released, and this is how raw story frames
it after Trump edits it.
Oh, this is the same one. It's right
here.
So what's interesting is that's which which I
agree, actually. I think that's more of the
the
because here here's the way the independent framed
it. Trump team weighs releasing Ghislaine Maxwell's interview
with DOJ officials over Epstein case.
Now it says, the Trump administration is considering
publicly releasing an audio recording
of an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell and senior
officials
from the Department of Justice about Epstein according
to the report. Now why would that not
be released?
If you had any same point, victims and
so on. Okay. So then what's the debate
here? And on top of that, the real
the end of the day,
if they release this with edits,
no one's gonna buy it. Now that doesn't
mean there's necessarily proof of a crime or
that they hid something that isn't just victims,
but it shows you the inherent distrust right
now from even their side.
Now it says CNN also reported, per its
sources, that some within the administration were concerned
that making details from the interview public would
bring the Epstein controversy back into the public
spotlight.
When many officials close to the president believed
the story is largely died down or that's
what they really want you to think and
it's not true. In a statement, Steven Chu,
Chung, White House communications
director said, quote, it's this is nothing more
than CNN trying desperately to create news out
of old news. He already addressed this issue
in an interview with Newsmax,
a real news outlet that routinely gets better
ratings than CNN.
Typical game they play. Like, that has nothing
to do with the point. You're just trying
to distract by look. I don't disagree. CNN's
a trash platform. So is Newsmax. What's funny
is that you're trying to distract by throwing
that in. You know, that's what I always
say. Right? When you're on the hot feet,
bad Democrats, pedophiles, you know, and get people
looking in their direction even if those things
are true. The point it's just very common.
What I think is interesting. So the main
point
is that, you know, so that's what that's
you know, that now they have the effort
to manipulate or the ability to manipulate this.
And so if you already see them redacting
personal names that aren't necessarily there for anything
other than, you know, his name and his
friend and whoever they're redacting that aren't there's
not a legal reason to do so or
a victim reason.
Why wouldn't they do the same everywhere? I
think that's quite obvious, left or right. I
think they're all compromised in all of this.
But what's interesting is that he's saying, that's
all CNN fake news, when all they're saying
is
the obvious, which they've already basically said that
this is we don't want this to come
back into the spotlight. So now he's calling
it fake news to point out the obvious
and references Newsmax. Well, I think that's important
to highlight, that Newsmax
was the platform that just literally, like, a
week and a half ago, at least one
of the people on Newsmax tried to convince
you that Ghislaine Maxwell was a victim.
So interesting. Right? So now you got Trump
gravitating towards Newsmax to say we already addressed
it over there. On the platform, they're trying
to convince you that she is a victim.
I think that's very interesting. Don't forget this.
The deputy attorney general, the number two ranking
official in the justice department,
and he's about to meet with Jeffrey Epstein's
ex girlfriend
in prison, Ghislaine Maxwell,
to find out what she knows.
Let's let's find out what is this all
about. And she's also been subpoenaed,
by the oversight committee. I think this is
great. I do have a feeling that she
has been
she just might be a victim.
She just might be.
There was a rush to judgment. There was
a lot of chaos there for a while.
See that is that what a journalist is
supposed to do? You know what I mean?
Like, you're and this is not some long
form conversation. Right? Because there's there's room for
having a long form, like, just this is
a report about what's going on, and he's
literally, she may be a victim. Okay. Based
on what facts? Please continue. Oh, nothing? Nothing
but your gut feeling? That's just not how
that's supposed to work.
Alright. Granted, she hung out with Jeffrey Epstein,
and I know that's, apparently not good.
Apparently?
I this is just weird. I thought this
was insane when this first came out. I'm
like, how is this guy? I bet I
want I wonder if he even has a
job anymore. Mostly. She's in jail
for how long now? Twenty years. A twenty
year sentence.
Well, Alan Dershowitz is one of the greatest
attorneys who ever lived. There is. And he
has this to say about the Ghislaine Maxwell
situation speaking with
the Newsmax veteran,
Eric Bolling.
Should Jolene Maxwell be behind bars?
She shouldn't be, but she is. She is
really serving Jeffrey Epstein's sentence after he committed
suicide.
There was no one else to prosecute because
there was no real information against anybody else.
And so, they went after her, and they
sentenced her to a sentence that would have
been appropriate for Epstein.
Oh, so no nobody else? No evidence about
anybody else? How exactly is that even possible
if you're accusing them of trafficking? On top
of that, the reality is
every single moving part of the Trump administration,
even himself, in plenty of ways that were
insinuated, not very, very obvious, but insinuated, but
Cash and Dan, they have been screaming about
the Epstein files, the Democrats, they're all pedophiles
for the longest time until they're clearly now
changing their tune. So you're gonna be are
are you now saying, Dershowitz, that every single
person that you support on the right has
all been lying to us about what they
know and where this goes and who's all
involved?
Then, okay, if that's the case, then why
is Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Barr, and
everybody else being brought in for testimony?
It just this is all just so transparently
dishonest.
This guy is doing work for covering this
up.
You know, the the point is that they're
trying to convince you that she is a
victim. Now this was just interesting. This was
on one of these threads. Look at this
is look at this picture of Maxwell and
Trump.
I
clearly seems to be trying to hide who
she is, at least with a wig, at
a time when she wasn't as well known,
and Trump does not look that young in
that picture.
I think that's very relevant. This is not
some old thing, and look how long this
has been going on.
And it's again, if you're if you're of
the mind this is a threat by dissenter
news. If you're of the mind and this
is only about one side, you're not paying
attention.
They're both your US government, left and right,
is not on your is not it was
working for people like this. I mean, it's
that's my opinion, but I guess the way
the way to put it so it's not
you know, it's just that it's it's one
one government.
If you're looking at this as who's involved
or you hear us talking about one side,
I'm not making about Trump or Biden. I'm
making about the government, and all of them
are representing that. And I think this is
important to think about as they just, you
know,
listen to Newsmax, and they're trying to tell
you she's a victim. Now this is Daily
Beast. Trump admin broke rules
to move Ghislaine to club fed camp, which
we've reported on recently. And it was
it just it's just wild to me. This
is a
not only do they violate a rule to
do it, it's just it's where are all
the people?
Imagine if Biden had done this for the
exact same reason. Say, oh, that point is
always valid to reach certain people. Because you
know as well as I, if you're listening
right now and you hadn't considered that and
you went, oh, yeah. If Biden had done
that, we would have been calling him a
pedophile. We'd have been calling him a sex
trafficker.
More so.
And now,
you know, or you're working with him. We're
trying to get him off, you know, get
him off the hook. So this is Daily
Beast
from the third.
Convicted child sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell, secured a
secret prison transfer after the Bureau of Prisons
waived a rule designated to punish sex offenders.
Now, also, it was supposed to be marshals
as opposed to marshals are supposed to be
bringing somebody like this. Instead, they went around
them or rather under them, I guess, and
use the bureau of prisons
personnel,
which was weird.
I think it's because there's there's a lot
more going on with all this, and I
think there's something else in regard to the
way the Trump administration is working through all
this. But it says she wasn't transferred to
a lower security federal prison.
She was transferred to a lower security federal
prison camp closer to her family in Bryan,
Texas last week after she reportedly spent two
days speaking with deputy attorney general Todd Blanch
about her connections to Epstein.
And it says the move required the bureau
to waive its policy
that convicted sex offenders
must be held at least at low level
prisons, which this is below that.
Why does that make sense to anybody? Why
would this possibly line up?
Even if she wants to testify, are we
not gonna hold her accountable for her crimes
of sex trafficking with minors?
This is just it's beyond the pale for
me right now. You're literally allowing her to
be you know, in my my opinion, like
I said before, that's part of the agreement
they've already made in my opinion. I say
that repeatedly because I just can't be sure
this is you know, we either we don't
know. But the deal, the the the two
meetings, the box they gave her, the what
she said, the move to a different prison,
the weird kind of moving of this through
the government that seems to be leading towards
no real outcome, I think that's what this
suggests, but we'll have to wait and see.
Now since Maxwell received a waiver
to facilitate the move.
So giving them a benefit.
Right? Giving her a waiver with it for
for that human traffickers don't usually get to
go to a prison they're not supposed to
go to.
Of course, reported by, you know, Ken Delaney,
you know, mister mister CIA
false reporter, which gave her access to less
restrictive prison environment than than the one that
she was in tell in Tallahassee.
A federal prison camp is a minimum security
facility with dorm like housing
meeting with the bureau of prison's lowest security
level designation.
Low level security prisons are a step up
from prison camps that she's in.
A prison consultant told Delaney that he had,
quote, never seen this done before for a
sex offender.
Alright? So imagine that was being stated about
something that Biden did.
The move also came after she was reportedly
threatened by other inmates for being a snitch
according to the Daily Mail. The publicity around
now that very well could be a manufacturer
story to rationalize the move. You know, if
possible. The publicity around her con conversations with
the Department of Justice reportedly put a target
on her back, which I wouldn't surprise me,
just considering that it could have just been
something that the narrative used to move her
away because she's in danger. There's plenty of
other places you could have gone. As soon
as or just in in solitary.
As soon as Ghislaine spoke to the government,
she was considered a snitch by other inmates
at Tallahassee.
There were very real and very credible threats
in her life. Doesn't that start to feel
like exactly the way they set the Epstein
story up? They They moved him because he
was getting threatened and the guy tried to
strangle him. Okay. Just making note of the
overlaps.
The prison also houses disgraced
Theranos,
Theranos Theranos?
Theranos. Right? The the founder Elizabeth Holmes, you
know, for that that whole weird fake bio
company, I think. And the Real Housewives of
Salt Lake City star Jen Shah. The families
of Epstein victims condemned the move, saying it
smacks of a cover up. The families of
the victims.
They're they've lost the control of this completely.
Now I just thought it was weird that
Elizabeth Holmes, she's in the same same spot.
And get ready for some kind of weird
overlap of the watch them just come out
with some new bio company after they all
get out. Turns out that was what it
was always about. We'll find out. Even though
I don't think Elizabeth Holmes is real, but
joking kind of, but funny overlap. Maxwell has
also reportedly sought a pardon from Trump who
has not yet ruled it out.
We'll have to wait and see how that
goes.
Now, Orwell gave you some some images here.
This is the prison fence between you and
this human trafficker.
There's your federal prison camp, Brian.
That's what's keeping her inside.
It's like a college campus is what it
looks like to me. And Orwell's points out,
meanwhile oh, so these are the fences holding
Maxwell who was charged with trafficking minors. She
went from maximum security prison to being able
to shout or shake hands outside the neighbors
of Bryan, Texas. Now why would the government
allow that?
Just meanwhile, Comer claims that he is waiting
for her appeals case to complete before allowing
Maxwell to testify before congress. However, that appeal
was they they've submitted the documentation for that
to be denied,
and which is right here for you to
read for yourself.
This is from the US government. This is
from
07/28/2025,
included for you to check out.
Now what I find interesting
is the Obama overlap to all this for
many reasons.
Obviously, just the idea of going like, look
at the Russia gate. Look over there. Let's
not forget, guys. Trump has already come out
and said Obama has immunity
and pointed to his own case and said
he emailed I think he even said, paraphrasing,
he better thank me because that sort of
set this up for robot. So the the
idea that you think this is gonna go
after I mean, it just doesn't line up,
but they could do whatever they want. We'll
see what happens. But legally speaking and just
precedent,
I highly doubt this is gonna go anywhere.
But maybe it's gonna be an underling. You
You know? Somebody that they'll go after to
make it seem like they're going after the
Russiagate people. But this story just doesn't they
just seem to be desperately focusing on this.
Trump army breaking. 20 CIA, FBI agents confirmed
that Barack Obama and a former CIA director
fabricated the Russian hoax, which was then locked
away in a CIA vault for almost a
decade to brainwash voters and discredit Trump election
by manipulating intelligence.
Then Hans Hans says this was reported a
week ago. Right? This is how is that
breaking new information?
Now maybe the additional aspect of some people
that state, you know, this these people confirmed.
What okay. That's not some bombshell. A 104,000.
3,000,000 views. It's just funny how desperate this
is
a repeat of exactly what we already know.
And by the way, the same thing a
week ago. This DNA
break down.
I'm I'm of the mind that most everybody
everywhere was very aware of this already. Wait.
Wait. Nobody's in jail. It's not like this
report was new. Trump had this information the
last time he was in power. So right
now, they've got this information,
and he called them, and he said treason.
No one's going. No one's being arrested. Now
realize this is not the point at which,
well, they have to do investigation. No. No.
No. That's already happened. The information is there.
So if you're claiming they're criminals, why are
they still walking around? If you can't piece
that together, you don't wanna see it.
This is not going anywhere unless unless it's
a desperate move, in my opinion, to convince
you. I I don't even think then. I
don't think this is actually gonna happen. And
what's funny is other comments,
breaking. We've known this since 02/2017.
You know? These are conservatives in some cases.
They're just like, yes. Look. Again, if you
didn't hear my last garbage, I'm not claiming
this is unimportant.
They should be in jail. They are criminals,
but so too are Trump and Biden, all
the rest of them. But what's crazy to
me is that I think it's not gonna
go anywhere. So my point is I think
this is just a head fake to get
you thinking something's happening even though we all
know that rarely, if ever, actually happens like
this. And so when we when they point
it out, it's not that I'm saying it
shouldn't matter, but that we all seem that
I think it's not going to amount to
anything, and we should be focusing on what
we actually can do something about. But look,
good. Put him in prison. But if it's
just this this narrative that keeps cycling and
they keep going breaking, this guy agrees.
Let's start recognizing that it's more of a
constant
manipulation.
Alex Jones, breaking. And a first, the DOJ
has sent criminal charges to a federal grand
jury with the goal of indicting the Obama
Russian Oaks. Okay.
That statement's being circulated.
Look for yourself. You can look, investigate, look
on the DOJ website, ask Roth, do whatever
you want. The reality seems to me that
this was a stated thing that has yet
to materialize.
Like, here's here's what it would look like.
Or I guess this is a different post,
but, like, the d it it would look
like the DOJ post we had up a
second ago. Actually, that's not the right one.
But it it'll look like the one that
we showed earlier with the,
the Illumina. You know, it'll have that DOJ
level. So that that's the point is that
that would be posted, and it would say
this is a grant. It's not happening. Not
that I can find. Now if I'm missing
something, please show please share it with me.
What I find fascinating in all this is
they're saying, oh my god. Look. They're going
after them for the Russia hoax, which, by
the way, Trump already said he has immunity
from, so I highly doubt it will happen.
And the rest of them are tied into
the same government structure.
And he says, we want the deep state
indicted. Right? So he means Democrats because that's
the stupid thing they do. We want them
convicted, and we want their asses, Brendan Clapper,
Comey, Jack Smith, Hillary Clinton. We want their
treason ass in prison. Oh, you mean the
Clintons, the Trump's ever good people that he's
not he chose not to go after? This
guy, they're constantly manipulating their people, constantly lying
to the people who support them for something
else. Whatever that is, you can decide. But
come on, guys. Really?
After everything we've seen, just even the last
six months, this is what we're stating? The
reality to me is that this clearly is
not even appear like, at the moment, again,
like I said, doesn't even appear to be
actually happening,
stating this to keep you on the hook.
But what is continuing what is currently happening
is putting out subpoenas for Bill the same
people he's pointing to, by the way. Bill
Clinton.
It was right here. Bill Clinton, James Comey,
Lynch, Holder, Garland. Isn't it weird? So he's
going go after these people for the Russiagate
hoax,
but instead, they're being subpoenaed for Jeffrey Epstein,
which which good. I think they're all criminals
and probably all guilty. But what I find
really weird is that this is going to
be likely framed as that.
See what I'm saying? Like, I guess we'll
wait and see what happens tomorrow and the
next day, but I get the sense that
people are gonna look to this like that's
part of that. When really, this seems to
be, let's couch this on just we'll call
in some Democrats and go after the Democrats
for things that likely we can't even prove.
We'll make it about, which, again, let's not
be if you think for one second that
I don't think these people are guilty of
crimes along with this, you're wrong. I've covered
this for years. The point is that right
now, with all the time they've had, if
you think they're suddenly gonna go after them,
I mean, I I don't think you're right.
But I found that to be pretty strange.
So now you're gonna have you're gonna if
it even actually happens, by the way, and
if they even actually show up, and if
they then if they don't, if they even
actually go after him for not, which I
doubt all that will happen, think of what
it would look like to have Hillary Clinton,
Bill Clinton, march through congress and ask questions
by a bunch of rabid partisans like this
today is just crazy. They're all cartoons about
Jeffrey Epstein, all these imagine Marjorie Taylor Greene
asking questions of Bill Clinton. That's gotta be
something to watch. But my point is that
it's it where's the, you know, it will
amount to nothing, in my opinion, because if
you go into this in reality, every single
one of them or a lot of them
are also complicit in this. That's why the
Democrats and everybody else didn't want the list
and everything else to come out. They keep
voting this down. All of them.
Very weird to me. But we'll have to
keep watching. Right? Because this is gonna continue.
But here's the report. DOJ launching grand jury
investigation into Russiagate.
Attorney general Pam Bondi has ordered
a grand jury. So here's what I laugh
about.
You get people like
it mainstream alternative media
who constantly tell you the corporate media is
blind and dishonest because they are. Right?
But then this report comes out through corporate
media,
and that's what you get. Breaking news. What
they just said.
You You can look for yourself. I mean,
the things they're actually citing
are these exact that's what they're looking to.
So instead of saying like, so for me,
I wouldn't report I mean, unless it's simply
like this is what's being stated. Let's wait
and see. The idea that we're claiming they're
going to do that, to me right now,
that's wildly up in the air. And all
we have is them stating that Pam Bondi
said that somewhere in the background. No documents
have come out. Nothing has been posted.
And it says
into the intelligence regarding president Trump and Russia
in the Iran up to 2,016.
She has directed justice department staff to begin
legal proceedings and ordered a federal prosecutor to
present evidence to a grand jury about the
matter to secure a potential indictment according to
a source familiar with the body's efforts. It
is unclear what the charges would be and
who would be charged.
So statements. How many times have we heard
them say things that never actually happen?
So as always, if we're objective, we'd wait
and see. I'm not saying we know for
sure it won't happen.
History seems to suggest it won't. Or if
it does, then it won't really amount to
anything genuine. But
CBS News said, so, you know, so no.
That's that's what Infowars reports it for sure.
You know, that's how that works.
Now, five times August, clearly seeing through all
the BS today,
white the White House says the most transparent
presidency president in history. Don't you also find
those kind of posts? That to me, that's
like cat turd going, everything's amazing. You're winning.
High five. It's like, no. No one thinks
that right now. You're ridiculous. So for them
to come out and be like that at
this moment in time, I just feels desperate.
Most transparent president and five times August says,
just don't ask about s Epstein, the COVID
shots, or I could fill in other 17
things. Right? It's just weird. Now one last
thing I included at the end here that
I think is very weird and stands out,
this is an actual post from the times
of Israel on their blog section from 07/21/2025.
July 21. That's four days before the kind
of spin out of the Epstein file point
of Trump being told his name was on
the list. Here's what it says. Trump and
his administration
criticized Netanyahu in Israel, which they didn't really.
Like, let's be real. There's been floated kind
of back and forth. But, I mean, let's
let's put it this way, in my opinion.
It very well could have been an actual
break, and maybe that that maybe that's why
this makes sense. But they are still supporting
them. They're still funding the war. They're still
funding the genocide.
That's clear. So, the rest of it's been
narrative as far as I'm concerned. What am
I always saying? Action, precedent, outcome. That's all
that should matter right now because they're always
lying to you. So, based on that, they're
still completely lockstep. They're simpatico.
But what's interesting
is
if there is more to this, like, rather
whether this is a pressure point for Trump
and Israel, which is exactly what I do
think is going on,
which that's why they're still together because they
do have this over them. That's the hypothetical
point. Like, that's rather what we should consider.
And what this article is about
is claiming that
Donald Trump insulted Netanyahu or whatever or just
didn't do what he was told, and Israel
used the Epstein files
because they're on them. Think about how crazy
that is. This is from the Times of
Israel. It says, and now the Epstein files
are haunting him. Right? So he insulted Netanyahu
and Israel, and now the Epstein files are
a problem for him. That's the first two
sentences.
For now, it says for a long time,
the files had subsided in the background. They
weren't considered to be much of a threat
to Trump. But all of a sudden, right
after he started up with Israel, the files
surfaced,
and they seem to be overwhelming him.
See what the this is a very interesting
way to frame this. Trump blasted and not
necessarily even that hard to wrap your mind
around or dishonest or inaccurate, but this is
Times of Israel writing this rather specifically, Josef
Janowski
for Times of Israel.
And it says Trump blasted BB after shrapnel
hit a church in Gaza. Far far more
than that, by the way, after they destroyed
these things and, you know, bombed every church
and every hospital. But it says the church
and it was the point was it was
because it got a lot of attention because
the pope called the the the, pastor there
all the time. That's the only reason they
were forced to make a big deal about
it because people cared because the pope talked
about it. Just shows you how gross this
all is. But he says the church is
in a war zone
because they make it that way. It was
not targeted. Yes, it was. Either shrapnel from
a nearby explosion hit it, but that's not
true. But even it did, it's the same
stupid point that you're bombing civilian locations. But
it says still Trump berated BB. Not really.
He called it out a little bit, barely,
and demanded he just publicly expose
expressed regret.
How dare he? You know? But since after
Israel bombed places in Syria in order to
protect the Druze, again, insane levels of propaganda.
They're literally killing the Druze. They're they're ethnically
cleansing them or bombing them with their own
bombs to blame it on,
at the time, I think it was Lebanon.
It's what they constantly do. But he says,
from the White House referred to BB as
a madman, because he is. It seems that
Trump's ambitions
maybe to sign business in oil deals with
Syria. Yeah. We're talking about the terrorist that
they're all supporting, including Israel right now in
Syria. Or maybe to win the Nobel Peace
Prize.
Not actually a joke, by the way, for
them. And more important to him than preventing
the slaughter of Druze, more important to him
than stopping Israeli Druze from crossing into Syria,
something that would greatly escalate fighting and bloodshed.
Huckabee
also chimed in, blasting Israel for withholding visas
from evangelical groups. It's all feigned resistance, guys.
Huckabee just came out screaming about how no
one's dying and no one's starving in Gaza.
These people are not on your side. But
it says, it seems that Israel wants to
first ensure that the groups don't plan to
missionize.
But Huckabee seems intent insensitive
to Israel's concerns. Yeah. Because that's what they
really think. Not just ethnic cleansing and hatred.
Just fair. Right? Trump decided to bomb Iran's
nuclear sites, and that's commendable. I'm trying to
cut to the point here. And now some
oil files are threatening him. Blah blah blah.
Trump perhaps Trump will realize
that it really doesn't pay to start up
with Israel. Do you get this? It's not
even veiled, guys. There I mean, barely, barely
veiled. They're saying if you call out Israel,
even for things that we know are wrong,
they're gonna use the Epstein files against you.
It says perhaps those implicated in the files
will express contrition and regret. It's like they're
like, we don't all know exact like, here's
the crazy thing. The way he's writing this,
you're supposed to get what he's doing.
Otherwise, it doesn't make sense. He's basically like,
you can feel the the smirk as he
says, well, maybe you know, who knows? Maybe
the people in the files will turn up
and, you know, maybe you'll get called out
for crimes.
They're making it very clear, at least the
insinuation, that they think Israel has stuff on
Trump.
And it says because when doctor divine providence
or excuse me. Because by divine providence,
things that were hidden become revealed, it enables
people to correct their mistakes and to endeavor
to live their lives properly the way god
wants them to. That's almost like threatening Trump.
You better do this or we're gonna call
out your crimes. It says, and everyone sees
that the world is not a jungle and
that god almighty runs the world. Why it's
weird that they don't why would they not
type it seems weird.
With compassion, giving you know, whatever. Blah blah
blah. It goes on to say the peaceful
world I mean, I that's the gist of
it. The bottom line is repeatedly stating,
he called out Israel, and now the Epstein
files are a problem. And goes on to
continually reiterate the fact that that's because
he called out Israel. And the timing of
it, you know, it's just it's it's not
even it's not even,
tactful.
It's very clumsy. You are threatening to do
this, or at least that's how he reads
it, that Israel's doing that.
Is that not insane?
This is what we're always talking about. That
they're Your own government will tell
you this is what they're doing in Israel,
and then Israel will stand up and and
challenge that. Tell their people that we're killing
them because we love whatever it is.
And they just keep lying to you. You
can literally show them and they'll call you
a Hamas supporter.
How do we not see this? Then we're
gonna end with this point about not I
think not yet.
Pretty much right now. One quick point about
this, then we're gonna come back to, you
know, basically, Mossad infiltration of this government. But
my god, has it ever been this clear
in ever in history?
Maybe, but I've never seen it.
So before we get to this the the
that general point to kind of that's gonna
be the last few segments.
Quick overlap to it relates, and you'll see
why. This is this relates back to Epstein,
and then the larger point continues to relate
to infiltration.
This is Catherine Austin Fitts, the the sense
receptor, playing her thoughts
in an interview about Epstein and Trump and
why he was brought into power in the
first place. You'll find this very insightful, and
I'm and I think most of you probably
agree with this. I think they put Trump
in to get the control grid.
And we have at Solaria, we have a
collection that we update every week of all
the things the administration is doing to build
the control grid. And I have to tell
you, you know, if I had chosen Trump
to get the control grid and I was
gonna grade him on his performance to date,
he gets an a plus plus plus.
Now we do a kind of recurring we've
done about three of them so far. We're
right now planning another one, like, a recurring
IMA panel about, like, the controls. You know?
It'll eventually will stop, you know, hopefully, but
the point is that we'll continue to update
what they've the steps they've taken thus far
in the interest of the control grid
in the current administration. And every single time,
it's just more and more and more. And
we we tend to go off her, you
know, Solari report where she keeps updating it,
but I'm sure we'll do another one coming
up soon. And it's it's just wild. I
mean, you know all of it. We go
over all of it, whether it's the the
mRNA health platform side of it, whether it's
the Panopticon or Doge and the, you know,
the Starlink satellites or the I mean, every
single thing they're driving forward right now is
in the interest of this, at least in
part.
That's not my opinion. You understand? That's very
easy to see. Catherine's breaking this down every
single day. And so she's simply saying that
Trump was put there for that reason. Now
you whether he knows that is something we
should be considering.
But I very much agree with her at
a core value that that is why he's
there, both to pacify people
who would otherwise be the most resistant as
well as just to roll it. I mean,
that's I think that's the central point for
me. Because if he wasn't there and it
was Obama or Biden or anybody else with
a d, these people would be marching through
the streets.
Same thing with COVID.
And they didn't because they thought he wouldn't
be the guy to do it. He's done
a fabulous job.
And I can't imagine another politician who could
have done this much this fast.
So but if you look at what they've
achieved,
I don't think they need Trump anymore.
Now that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid
of him. But
Interesting thought. Right? She's not wrong. It's sort
of like the
you know, once they got, like, with Elon
Musk and Doge, I mean, he jumped away.
They're still rolling everything's rolling forward. You could
really remove Trump from this equation.
And at this point, it would continue. Almost
probably even help them at this point for
the way it's starting to feel, but we'll
have to wait and see. If they wanna
get rid of him with Epstein, they can.
It will work.
Yeah. I just don't surprised that, like, to
me, it's quite obvious that Trump is on
the list because they were besties. But if
he's on the list, and he knows, of
course, he would be on the list, why
was he making Epstein so important during his
campaign? Because, of course, it would backfire at
some point. It it's it's doesn't seem logical
for Trump to to use,
Epstein as a as a as a trump
card in in the campaign.
So I don't know if he was using
a lot in the campaign. I think Kas
Patel was using it a lot, and I
think Dan Bagena was using it a lot.
Well, this is his team was using it.
Right? So and also all his supporters were
vocal about it, and he didn't he didn't
he he could have stopped it
back then already.
And Vance too, by the way. At least
at least more than once, I've seen Vance
bring it up before the selection process. Now
it's too late to get the genie back
in the bottle.
So here's who pushed it, and I didn't
realize this
until recently,
because I was
very early on in saying QAnon was a
hope horn and ridiculous and not to pay
any attention to it. But what I didn't
understand was QAnon made a very big deal
about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning
it all up.
And, you know, basically, the Democrats were engaged
in pedophilia,
and they were at the heart of Epstein,
and Trump was going to secretly clean it
all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge
deal about Epstein.
And,
you know, that is seriously, in my opinion,
and and I say this because I know
many people trapped in it, you know, it's
a cult. It's just
it's just a completely adult fairy tale.
But they believed it. And so now that
he's coming out and saying, oh, it was
a hoax,
you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies
completely in the face of the cult. So
now now we've got a really big problem,
and I
I don't know why he didn't
put it back in the box. I I
don't know why. And it's too late now.
I think especially since Musk is saying he's
on the list. To me, it all seems
like a a a trick to, in the
end, get rid of Trump and then continue
with fans who was Yeah. That's something we've
all a lot of people consider. You know,
as as Steve calls it Peter Thiel's golf
club. But what what's
we forgot I mean, at least I forgot
about it in the moment, that really weird
moment where Elon Musk broke away and said
he's on the list. I mean, what is
that about? Like, how can you possibly fit
that in
to it being in any way in their
benefit?
So, it's, you know, that's how we fit
that in. How does that make sense? Was
Elon actually upset with him? Was there some
kind of split? You know, it's really difficult
to tell at this point. Like, this is
why it's always important to consider that there's
always multiple agendas. There's always moving parts. You
know? And even if it's like like with
COVID, that they all seem to be lockstep
in one large agenda, there's always
vying underling agendas everywhere. Their own their own
personal benefit for their own long term agenda.
That's important to think about. So that may
be why that took place. Already part of
the volunteer
and and Peter Thiel gang anyway.
If if the if the people who run
the system want Trump out Mhmm. They can
use Epstein to do it. It will work.
And they can get them out by the
end of the year if they want. I
totally agree with that. Like, imagine right now,
let's just say she's right and that the
people the design was that they're done with
Trump for some reason.
Put out a put out put some information
out that comes out that's and right now,
they've already kind of slanted it that way.
If suddenly something slips out that shows you
that Trump was involved, I think half of
the supporters would start to think that's the
case because of the way he's dealt with
this. I think it would I think at
this point, that would actually work, but that
wouldn't be a positive thing because clearly that's
what they want and they're trying to get
him out of the way to roll in
the next thing. But, you know, it's not
that it's a good thing he's there in
the first place. I mean, I think they're
all criminals, but how about we just get
rid of him entirely? No government, but no
one's ready for that just yet. But going
forward,
in regard to the control grid, right, Douglas
even Douglas McGregor,
He says, congratulations.
MAGA is being taken for a ride to
the surveillance state.
Look at Palantir Tech. Guys, look at how
incredible that is.
That is my what is that? Jeez.
That's that's like quadrupling their I mean, especially
when you go back to before 2024,
they have exploded
because they're everything. But you listen to Jones
and the rest, a small little thing. The
Democrats are making it making it an ant
out of a, you know, a molehill or
what what's what's that phrase?
A mountain out of a molehill. You know,
it's like it's it's that's not true. It's
not some small thing that you know, it's
it is one of the largest and most
valuable companies in the world right now and
very clearly is not spying on the government.
It is spying on you according to everything
you could possibly look to. So consider those
that are trying to lie to you about
that.
Now this is an interesting overlap.
Barnes said, as soon as Elon Musk and
Doge wanted to go to the defense department
and the Federal Reserve, Elon was suddenly out
and Doge suddenly cut off. Coincidence?
Maybe. You know, it may very well could
be that that Elon Musk is not the
villain, and he's that's why I mean, I
it's hard to see it that way. With
everything that's going on and everything they're involved
with I mean, look, the reality is Elon
Musk has worked with Biden and Trump and,
you know, he's a government contractor. He's part
of the technocratic rollout. That's not hard to
see.
So this,
whether he is
genuinely wanting to fix problems in the government
or not, I don't think it's in our
interest to believe that Elon Musk is the
hero in this situation. If not, on top
of that, that this was all coordinated to
get you to think that, which is worth
considering.
But I don't think it's coincidence that or
even that he was genuinely trying to go
after those things. Was he really? At what
point was he ever truly actually gonna look
into the Department of Defense? He even I
don't even think he really floated that idea
more than like, that that never actually was
even close to coming to pass. I don't
think so. Neither was the Federal Reserve. These
were things that they were talking about and
that people wanted to believe,
but really didn't materialize in my opinion. But
overall,
worth considering. Maybe he was trying and that's
why they booted him out to the side.
But my opinion, I said, you know, because
Elon was always the hero, guys. Yeah. That's
coming. Here comes the America party. Artificial intelligence
will save the world. And Elon Musk sets
himself up to be the one that was
always trying and the rest of them are
in the deep state. I figured it out.
I was inside. We I can see that
genuinely coming to pass and people would fall
for it just like they wanted to believe
in Trump even though we were all there
going, don't fall for it again.
It'll happen again. People who got tricked by
Trump will then go, okay, but Elon's the
one. It's just it's a cascade, guys. They
just keep you tumbling down the rabbit or
rather that's the wrong analogy. Tumbling,
you know,
up the I don't know. Not in a
good thing. Let's put it that way. But
so continuing,
APAC tracker,
this this overlap to Elon Musk and Twitter.
The Zionist asked oh, that's interesting. Is that
gone?
Oh, wow. They're all deleting these things now.
This is oh, okay. No. It's still there.
There was another one that looks like it
was deleted too. But look at that. Funny
how it's not showing up. It's it's one
more example of Twitter, guys, highlighting in or
hiding information. But But it says after our
legal appeal to Elon Musk to enforce the
new US sanctions against Thomas terrorism,
Francesca Albanese
had her blue check removed, and they're boasting
about it. They're saying it took one day
we called, reached out or no. That was
the other report. The point is they're simply
saying we asked, they responded.
Yesterday, today. So censorship, guys.
A person who has zero this is probably
one of the most principled people I've seen
in this conversation.
Regardless of what you think about her opinions,
she has stood her ground around what we
can prove is true and has not faltered,
has stood up for Palestine,
has not out there breaking the law, not
doing anything, and they're you're Hamas supporters. It's
the same thing they're calling Khalil, the same
thing they're calling Oster because they're desperate and
dishonest. And so what's crazy is Elon Musk
and Twitter
followed suit.
That shouldn't shock you at this point. It's
not a free speech platform. They're not out
for your sup they're not trying to help
you. They're working at the behest of something
else. They work with the ADL. They censor
Americans for Israeli
criticism.
It's not secret.
And so the eight pack tracker, which I
think is interesting, that doesn't show up. We'll
see if it does if I refresh it.
Isn't that weird, guys? That's the this is
everywhere you look. I've got a couple examples
coming up next.
Because that's the post. It's right there. Alright.
It was. I just closed
it.
Right there. The Zionist asked Elon to remove
UN special rapporteur, Francesca Albanese, check mark, and
he complied. Now let's see if it's back.
I didn't check since I've gotten live.
Nope.
It's gone.
I mean, think of how petty and stupid
that is. Are you arguing that she's not
who she says she is? You see see
how see how, how, punitive that is? That's
not how that's supposed to work. You get
it because they're claiming they've confirmed who you
are. And now they've just yanked it because
Zionists say we don't like what she says?
Do you realize how insane that is? How
obvious that is? That's who Elon and this
team, that's what they are, guys. That's why
they're I think they're not even remotely on
your side.
And I said the free speech platform as
long as Israel agrees.
George Galloway
says reinstate her, Elon Musk. I doubt it's
gonna get any you know, people are gonna
do anything about it. See, I got liked
earlier, and now it wasn't there. That happens
all the time too. By the way, on
a quick side note, you ever go back
and look at, like, I have things that
I often, like, you know, every so many
months, I'll retweet to get it back in
my so you got, like, that thread of
doctors, for example.
Every time I go back to him to
retweet and and like them, it's not retweeted,
it's not liked. That's not how it's supposed
to work. It's not supposed to eventually just
disappear. It's supposed to stay in your thread,
in your feed.
But how often I go back and things
like that are just casually removed, not liked,
not retweeted?
I don't need to convince all of you.
I think everyone knows. I think a lot
of people are just okay with it because
they don't like people that are being suppressed.
Typical how that goes. But it says, Zionists
got their way. Yedon Imas just suppressed a
UN expert,
Francesca Albanese, after a pro Israel legal group
got her blue check removed. I think how
dumb that is. You're fighting to get her
blue check removed like that even means anything
to anybody anymore?
Insane.
Daniel McAdams.
Anyone know what that means? He says, I'm
going am I going back to the gulag?
Look at what look at what it shows
him. Under review.
So his account actually, let's look real quick.
See if it's gone away.
Or if it even shows to us. No.
See, it only shows on his side. So
it's his he logs in, and that's what
he sees. Under review. And it says, oh,
she is it is it gone? No. It's
still there right now. The blue check is.
And
he said and it says, our team is
doing a quick review of your account. You
should see your check mark here within a
few days. The under review label is only
visible to you.
Interesting. Now, maybe it already happened. That's why
the check is there. I'm not sure how
that works. But I just think that's weird.
Right? It just can and,
Syrian girl says, oh my god. You're being
gulag again. We'll see. But you see, there's
no reason. He didn't do anything wrong. I
mean, you look for his work for yourself.
He's a very educated, very intelligent, very well
spoken. You know, it's it's not as out
there. You know, anything they would claim would
get you censored. Well, I guess that unless
you're criticizing Israel appropriately, well, that'll get you
censored right away. But
a couple of last points on this before
we get into the infiltration and overlap with
disaster funds for hurricanes, for example.
Right before I went live today,
actually, you know, this was Yeah. This is
the one from today. I'll do this one
first. So this is Oh, that's right. I'm
sorry. I'm mixing up. The reason I put
them that way, I gotta trust my lineup
before I jump back in. I always do
that and reorganize and realize why I did
it in the first place. For those of
you listening who even know what I'm talking
about. So, first one.
This is from today. And I said before
I could even go live.
This is this is on this post, which
we'll see if I can see it still.
Yep. There it is. Like, literally within seconds
of posting this. Look at the engagement.
Really? Does that that that lined up for
people? That this is with 77,000
followers, that we get five likes on all
it's not it's not even about likes. It's
about you got a thousand views.
A thousand. That's just not the list is
supposed to represent some kind of overlap to
if you've got so many followers, you're gonna
get this percentage on a general basis.
Never. When this happens, it's shockingly suppressed. And
every time it matters,
they jump in and just do this and
tag that. It's all it's always half the
time it's nonsense. Then they block you, and
then this is the person they're oh, come
investors, you know, stocks and crypto.
It's all completely contrived, guys. This is about
bomb suppressing you by blocking and downvoting whatever
it is, and it works every time or
just whatever Twitter wants to do. And I
just simply said, before I could even go
live, they seek to suppress the show. Just
another day on the free speech platform. If
you care about free speech, support Bitchute.
This one is one that I was posting
earlier. We're gonna talk about that to start.
It's an article from the the Free Thought
Project that we posted from Rachel Blevins back
in 02/2017.
You know it. You know the story. It's
breaking news right now. But in regard to
other things, it's important to think about though.
Texas officials forcing hurricane Harvey victims to pledge
loyalty to Israel to receive funding. Seriously.
We're gonna go over it. Half of most
people didn't even believe it back then.
So we posted that. And look. Wait. What?
You can't be real. Invest in this person.
Every single time. It's just nuts.
Okay.
Important article. Now, the gist of this,
Eric and Harvey were after, there were people
that well, two things, people that were trying
to help, that were, like, arrested and shut
down because they were trying to help people
that the police weren't helping. Not in one
day, but over a period of time where
they couldn't get to them because the water.
And so people brought their boats and they
were like, you're not allowed to. Like, it
just it's disgusting what they do and it
happens every time left or right. Every time.
Here, people were try getting being handed documents
when they were trying to collect aid, and
they said, well, you have to sign this.
And people look closely, and it said, I
will not boycott Israel.
How disgustingly dishonest. It's not telling them, first
of all, but secondly, that this is American
taxpayer aid, and you're telling us we can't
criticize a foreign government, which one, is unconstitutional,
and two, has nothing to do with American
aid or taxes
other than
Abbott's complete
occupation by Israel, it seems. But you can
read through this for yourself. Now one thing
I wanted to highlight in this
is this see this tweet from Cynthia McKinney,
who I've interviewed, I think twice, way back
in the day.
It shows nothing. Right? It says not found.
That's weird seeing as how that's the tweet
right there.
Look at that. Now what's interesting about this,
it doesn't give me the option to embed
it.
Now I'm just I'm noticing right now that
she there there that is grayed out. Now
I wonder if that's because she did it.
I mean, you tell me what you think.
Is it normal for them not to be
able to embed tweets? I mean, I did
it here. I embedded it when I posted
this article back in 2017,
but I find it very interesting that either
she's being suppressed or something. You can't embed
this tweet anymore. That's why it says not
found. I I'm just pointing out, I think
there's a ton of these little suppressive tactics
that add up to a very big deal
on top of everything else. Her point was,
it's true, folks. One has to pledge not
to boycott Israel in order to get funding
to rebuild your home. Of course, now the
Texas page has been deleted because that's how
that tends to work. Even the Wayback Machine,
by the way. Every version of the Wayback
version has been also deleted. What is
and there there very few things seem to
get that far,
except in this conversation.
But Keith Woods points out,
a few days ago, Trump was threatening to
tear up a trade deal with Canada if
they recognized a Palestinian state. We talked about
that.
Wow. He says, Canada just announced that it's
backing statehood for Palestine.
That will make it very hard for us
to make a trade deal. The next day,
they didn't reach a deal, and I think
he put, like, 35 something, you know, up
he put on tariffs.
That's why.
Everybody. I mean, from,
Matt Walsh, Daily Wire came out and said,
that is absurd.
I mean, it's on its face absurd, guys.
You're doing look. I'm not saying I agree
that this is, you know, what he's doing
in tariffs are for the interest of this
country or in your benefit.
The point is that's what he's framing it
as and what a lot of them think.
And so the point is you're saying, I'm
not gonna do this thing that's in your
benefit
as we're framing it for you because they
support Palestine.
How is that America first? That's what Matt
Walsh and everybody was saying. You're doing this
for Israel at the expense of Americans, at
least as as the framing goes. Adam says
Trump threatens to pull a trade deal with
Canada if it backs Palestinian statehood. Now, the
point is the trade deal, not the tariff
necessarily. My point's about the tariff when I'm
saying that. Either way, the reality is he
didn't do the thing that he said was
in your benefit because they support Palestine or
they even feigned to.
Just it's
undeniably obvious, guys.
So, Keith says that happened.
Now, his admin, and this this was posted
yesterday,
is now promising to withhold disaster relief
from states that boycott Israeli companies. So, the
first the reason I started with that first
post is because it's not new.
This has been going on a long time
from left and right administrations. But, you know,
today, that's how these things work. Everything's brand
new. It's all breaking news every thirty seconds
because they repackage old stories. That's a lot
of the mainstream alternative media, just trying to
get grift along with everything.
The point though is that it has been
going on. This is not a brand new
story, but what's happening today is a
compounding version of it. The Trump is now
adding this. Now what's interesting,
on top of what was already there, on
top of the anti semitism bills, on top
of the censorship, on on top of everything
else that's happening, the deportations,
and then
walked it back.
They reversed their pledge to do so.
And then
as far as I can tell,
this is the this is the current page.
Just refreshed
it right there.
That's still or rather now says it again.
Now let me I'm gonna go through this
and show you. The thing that that was
outrageous and should still be
under anti discrimination
and recipients of aid that you pay taxes
for,
one of the things they list DEI. Alright.
Okay. One of them is discriminatory prohibited boycott
means refusing to deal, cutting commercial relations, or
otherwise limiting commercial relations
specifically,
which is even that, why do you need
to make it specific? Right there, that would
apply to any country. Right?
Specifically with Israel Israeli companies or with companies
doing business in or with Israel or authorized
by,
licensed by, or organized under the laws of
Israel to do business, which, by the way,
is pretty much your choice regardless of the
reasoning. I don't wanna do business with that
country, But not if it's Israel, it doesn't
matter. You're not allowed to do that.
Very weird. Now what I'm trying to show
you here is unless I'm missing something,
is this is the current live page. But
we're gonna go through this conversation to show
you that over the process of yesterday to
today,
they've
removed it
and I think added it back. I don't
know how else this could be their live
right now. Let me show you what I
mean, which I think screams eve I mean,
that's it shows two things in my opinion.
One, that they tried to do this without
people seeing it. It got seen, and it
made them look really bad, and people screamed
about it on top of everything else. Then
in an irrational move, just removed it and
said, never mind, and then put it back
in for some reason. Now what would that
tell you?
I mean, whether they that they they they'll
know you'll see it again and clearly benefits
only one group.
Now,
he says occupied country
in regard to what this shows you. I
don't know how we can start I don't
know how we can ignore the possibility of
that today with what's going on. That's not
some racial term. That's not some white nationalist
term I was once accused of for saying
occupied country by somebody I respected during COVID
nineteen. I don't know why I don't it
seems like they're all starting to see this
now. Right? They literally called me a white
national, white supremacist for simply saying Israeli government
is occupying or the term was we're occupied.
I didn't say we're you know, but the
same point that the Israeli government is influencing
the policy of this country.
Everyone, they just the point is people have
were terrified to go in that direction even
though it was easily proven.
So Kevin even Kevin Sorbo,
Just in. By the way,
Disclose TV puts out a tweet
that says that. Now, yes, they've got a
link down here, but the link just the
same thing. It's this report page that says
the same thing.
Doesn't it find isn't isn't it interesting that
people anywhere would ever go, oh, like, that
thing says that thing, so that's what I
know is happening? I just think it's I've
seen things disclosed TV is shared that I
can later prove aren't even true. It's, you
know, not as I don't I'm not saying
it's because they reported things that were widely
going around that didn't turn out to be
the case. Right? I'm not trying to suggest
that they're necessarily dishonest. I think largely this
close to the reports, things that are what
are what are happening. My point, though, is
that it's everyone's responsibility to not just go
that. What that tux the text says on
Twitter is what we know is happening.
People lie. People get misled. Anyway, the point
was Trump withholding disaster funding for states and
cities who boycott Israel.
So if you're paying attention, this has been
an ongoing story since 2017
and well before.
And he goes, wait. What?
I'm just like, god. It's crazy. I said,
finally starting to see it. It was always
there on both sides. And even that got
some reasonable reach underneath his in regard to
Trump saying he supports Israel. Now the question
is, what are they gonna do after this?
Are Are they gonna go right back to
blindly supporting Trump and and whatever team effort
goes forward, or are we gonna start to
recognize this is a problem? Even if he
pulls it back, which it doesn't seem that
it ended that way, doesn't that just show
you that he dare that you got caught
and he hides it? Oh, never mind. That
That doesn't make it any better. You understand?
Glenn Greenwald highlights what Sagar said, and he
goes, the Trump administration's decision to withhold disaster
relief, and this is yesterday before something had
shifted, is even more insane than I thought
he writes. It extends a ban on disaster
funds from our tax dollars to anyone who
refuses to deal with Israeli companies. That is
that's see, this is the this is the
issue. That's exactly what I just read to
you.
Glenn
says, even worse about this Trump policy that
bans disaster relief funds to any American state
or city boycotting Israel
is it only applies to Israel.
It really is just that clear.
Get you can boycott France, Peru, UAE, South
Korea, or even other American states and get
funds.
It just can't boycott Israel.
Speak for itself.
Matt Walsh, same thing. Same same tweet. Says,
there is just no way to reasonably claim
that this qualifies America first. I appreciate that.
It's exactly correct. It's simply not. You're literally
acting against this country's interest, or rather at
the very least putting them second at least,
and Torah
Jews, which is, forget which one it is.
Yeah. They got 58,000 followers. There's a couple
different ones, Torah Judaism, ones, Torah Jews. They're
all part of, like, the similar kind of
grouping of Orthodox Jewish communities that call out
that Zionism does not represent Jews, at least
in their opinion. And I think it's generally
the growing you know, I think people are
starting to recognize what Zionism is, and they
say unbelievable. The constant weaponization of antisemitism endangers
American Jews time and time again.
Now Trump administration won't provide disaster relief to
states. Now we're gonna get to the the
transition of this. We're just this is Stowell
the fourth. This is the report from antiwar.com,
which you should support, by the way. I'm
gonna be interviewing,
Dave DeCamp coming up. I believe we have
it on I did the same thing last
time. It's coming up this coming next week.
Looking forward to that because that's a long
overdue conversation, as well as Greg Reese, by
the way. He's gonna be coming on soon.
The Trump administration has said that states and
cities will not receive funding to prepare for
natural disasters if they choose to boycott Israel
according to report, Reuters.
And it says the document says that in
order to receive funds from the from from
FEMA, which falls under DHS, states must certify
that they will not engage in discriminatory prohibited
boycott. Now it says a discriminatory
prohibited boycott is defined in the document as
we just showed you, refusing a deal, cutting
commercial relations, or otherwise limiting commercial relations specifically
with Israeli companies.
It's very clear. That's their wording. Now it
says on condition of the of FEMA funding,
the condition on FEMA funding takes aim at
the boycott divestment and sanctions movement. Now as
remember, as always, throughout the time this has
been happening,
they all try to always frame them as
terrorists. They go, why can't you just go
through the
legal channels and go through activism and protest?
And then they do that, and they get
called terrorists.
BDS is a terrorist movement. It's like it's
just it the point is today, everyone's starting
to see why that's been going on, the
lie around it all. And the reality is
boycott and divestment and sanctioning rather than just
you being you being able to boycott and
divest from other companies
is your absolute right, constitutional and otherwise. And
so, all they're telling you is you're not
allowed to do that when it comes to
this one state
or anyone associated with that state. And it
says, which calls for a global boycott, that's
that's the BDS movement, to pressure Israel over
its occupation, illegal,
of Palestine
and its ongoing genocide in Gaza. After the
news about the Israeli boycott condition for FEMA
broke, it sparked a backlash online, which is
continuing to show you that people aren't locked
they're not blinded by the narratives these days.
That got shown conservatives were pretty upset about
it, rightly so.
And it says including from many Trump supporters.
In response, the DHS removed the language
about Israel from his terms for the funding.
But its statement made clear that it would
still enforce it anyway. So we'll address that
first.
So oh, well, this is interesting first. Nicholas
Fuentes comes out. We talked about him this
morning on and wake up. And And we
seem I largely agree. I just think it's
an odd way this developed. It's just suspicious,
but either way, it seems like he is
being, like, kind of cast. He's being attacked
by the rest of them, which is interesting.
But it says the Trump administration is now
withholding disaster fund relief from American states that
boycott Israel. So remember to pledge allegiance to
Israel before your house is destroyed by a
fire or hurricane. It could save your life.
That's perfect. Right?
Here's what Alex says. Good news. Under public
pressure, they just reversed.
I just it just speaks for itself. An
index red does says what I would probably
say. Alex, exactly how does that work? Trump
d h DHS. I hope you die if
though you don't support Israel. Oops. Sorry. Didn't
mean that. It's just, you know, they they
did this and then they walk it back
because it's too unpopular.
All that shows you is that they're they're
bowing to what you guys want from them,
which I guess arguably a good thing in
regard to how government should work, but it
shows you that they want those things. It
shows you that and really, it's not about
what you want. It's because they recognize the
juice wasn't worth the squeeze now. They still
think that way and even act that way,
which is what this next point is about.
And this person saying, you know, good news.
They just pulled back on that. And Vera
says, no. They removed it from the posted
document. Again, we're gonna I I think they
added it back, but made it clear that
they still enforce it. Here's what they posted.
Rather, Sagar says, okay. After speaking with folks,
here's what's actually going on. An original guidance
from DHS explicitly stated that federal disaster funding
was barred from states and allowed to boycott
of Israel.
The the White House changed this explicit language
after widespread outcry,
but
the DHS tweet
makes it clear that the admin reserves the
right to deny those funds on BDS grounds
should they want to.
DHS will enforce all anti discrimination laws and
policies, including as it relates to BDS.
So the fake Jones kind of argument about
all the rest of them going, we did
it. They listened to us. They did not.
They simply removed the text and said, well,
we're gonna do it anyway, though, just like
everything else they're doing because they are acting
against American interests for a foreign country.
They're telling you right there, guys, and it's
not about these terms. But even if it
was just about antisemitism, that is still not
a crime for you to express your thoughts
and think a certain way. What the how
however disgusting we may think it is. The
reality on top of it is always it's
not even about that. They're about people who
support Palestine
or call out the crimes of Israel, which
in their own definitions is now antisemitism.
It's just insane where we are. And it
says they might still do it. They're just
not saying it out loud right now, but
that's not even that's not I don't even
agree with that for anything. They're telling you
they're gonna do it. We reserve that which
says, we will enforce all of these laws
as it relates to BDS.
So they're saying we don't need that statement.
We already have the fake antisemitism legal legislation,
which by the way should be null and
void or is based on Murrah versus Madison
because it's con it's repugnant to the constitution,
but nobody cares about that. They're all repugnant
to the constitution today.
But here's the post, US Reserves pledge to
reverses pledge to link disaster funds to Israel
boycott stance.
The Trump administration on Monday reversed course on
requiring US citizen states to rebuke boycotts of
Israel company Israel Israeli companies in order to
receive disaster funds according to a statement and
deleted the earlier policy from its website.
The Department of Homeland Security removed its statement
that said states must certify
that they are not boycotting Israel to get
funding.
Reuters reported on Monday the language applied to
at least
$1,900,000,000
that states rely on to cover search and
rescue equipment. So you realize how gross that
is. You're literally holding over their head money
they need to potentially, not all we know
all states abuse the same thing, but potentially
use those funds to save people.
And you're going, you can't have it unless
you promise not to go after Israel.
You can't help Americans until I mean, this
is why this just keeps getting more ridiculous.
And it says and then so, search and
rescue,
emergency equipment, manager salaries, backup power systems, among
other expenses, according to the according to Reuters.
This is a shift in the administration for
the administration of Trump, which has previously tried
to penalize institutions that don't align with its
views on Israel.
Very clear. Everyone sees it. Now here's where
it gets super interesting.
This is the actual post from Homeland Security,
which they get called out for by Twitter,
which is hilarious,
where they say misleading. You just basically removed
it.
But they're saying there's no FEMA requirement
tied to Israel.
Axios is saying that's what the reality is
because it is. Even though they're I mean,
watch. It says there's no
sorry, hiccups all of a sudden. There's no
FEMA requirement
tied to Israel in any current NOFO.
No states have lost funding, and no new
conditions have been imposed.
FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and
policy. DHS will enforce all anti discrimination. And
they go on to say exactly that. But
they're saying there's nothing new. Well, guess what?
Even they called him out and said, that's
misleading seeing as how they only just now
removed the section stating exactly.
You realize how these people are inherently dishonest,
not left and right, just the government, guys.
But I'll be honest, it's far more ridiculous.
I just mean not just the dishonesty, but
their incap their inability to do so in
a in,
convincing way is way worse right now. Noam
and Bondi and Hegsa, these people are clumsy
as hell, and they're really bad at lying
to you, which is a good thing in
a way. I mean, in a really obvious
way. But my point is that they're coming
out like this and just going, that's not
true, even though everyone can tell that they
just like, we're not gonna be able to
piece that together.
To me, that's where I always go, that's
desperate.
Or or they're just really that incompetent, but
I don't necessarily think that in every case.
But so here's Mel.
And this is where I think it's important
to highlight these overlaps. She goes, why are
you lying? You literally updated your guidelines twenty
minutes ago. She posted this before the reader
context was added. Check this out.
She just ratioed, at least on likes,
the Homeland Security account, DHS,
who has
2,600,000.0
followers.
Okay? Mel's got pretty good following,
but it's only a 134,000.
And she ratioed them.
I mean, you have to realize how crazy
this is and how much this is breaking
down. So what she's trying to show you
is that they lied, which we knew. They're
just pretending they didn't do it. Here's the
actual pages. And she says, do you do
you realize the old links still show the
original document?
So that that may be why I'm still
seeing that. Like, so I that link still
goes there, the public link. But so here's
the point.
Here's what it said, as we just showed
you. Right? Are otherwise limiting commercial relations specifically
with Israeli companies
or is or or business in or with
Israel or authorized by a licensed or, you
know, Israeli businesses. Okay. Here the here's the
one that is what's supposed to be showing
now.
It just says federal anti discrimination laws
mean federal civil rights law that protect individual
Americans from discrimination on the basis of race,
color. So we see, that's what it that
even though we may disagree with the idea
of racial, the point is that that is
the way you write that. If you're talking
about racial discrimination, you wouldn't be like Israeli.
You would just say racial discrimination.
So that's what they changed it to.
How is that not shocking in and of
itself That they got caught and they rapidly
lied about it, covered it up, and said,
that didn't happen.
Don't man the mind. Don't don't mind the
man behind the curtain.
Okay. So back to the point. Oh, back
to the articles themselves. Here's the way back
version. It's on it's on the archive.
And you can see
it right there.
Very clearly
showing you that they did have this written
there. Okay?
I don't want that zoom in for me.
I don't know. Oh, well. Well, you can
see it either way.
Sometimes I can't get it to zoom in.
Israeli
companies.
Very clearly. Okay?
So what I find interesting, we'll come to
this one next, which is even more interesting
by the way.
This one does zoom in.
Let's refresh it. I mean, look, this is
not the Wayback Machine. This is on
dhs.gov.
And as far as I can tell, it
still says that. Now, I don't know what
I'm missing. Let let me know if you
guys think there's something because as she just
said, it still shows it on the link.
Like, I I don't know. Maybe they just
are that incompetent?
But what what I thought was interesting is
Mel did show the version where it was
changed. So I'm wondering whether they just literally
added it back, or maybe there's some kind
of a, a caching issue. Like, that that
that's how this works. Maybe it's gonna update
over the next day.
What do you guys think? I genuinely want
give me your input. Like, even right now,
I'll look at the chat if you guys
are so have immediate thoughts on it. But
this to me, if they added it back
on top of everything, that shows you that
they got pressure from per the people that
wanted it there. And that means that then,
so hypothetical,
that that means that that is more important
in the moment than in even as we
see them, which kinda adds up with what's
going on. But all that aside, all the
hypothetical aside, the reality is that this is
something that they added, then deleted because people
saw it and they're just lying about it.
Conservatives aren't stupid guys people see and I
I mean Americans aren't stupid.
In this case conservatives because that's what that's
what's happened. The point is that people are
but they're not just as dumb as people
want to make it out to be. I
know it's a popular opinion to be all
Americans are so stupid. I don't believe that.
Clearly plenty of them are but
people are seeing this it is breaking down
in front of you.
Now this is even more interesting.
S two underground says after this circulated social
media this morning, the Department of Homeland Security
has apparently decided to secretly violate the Federal
Records Act by surreptitiously editing this file.
So this may be why it was added
back if that's the case. Because the the
let me just I'll read this case for
you. This is actually really I comply I
think completely adds up.
It says they forgot to scrub the metadata
from the PDF. So if you look at
the metadata on the PDF, you can tell
right now that they have added it and
deleted it. Okay?
And so what it says is they forgot
to scrub the data, which confirms not only
the name of the person who last edited
the file, but also the exact time at
which it was edited, which happened to be
04:30PM
today. Now, I'm curious. I might reach out
to you afterward to find out if they
did it again after that, added it back,
which might be why right here. It says
DHS deleted the PDF from their website and
reuploaded this document, hoping that no one would
notice. You see, they tried to deceive you.
That's why I'm talking about the junior team.
They didn't think we would be able to
piece that together because they're not the top
they they clearly.
But it says the name of the PDF
itself keeps keeps the version three label and
the same upload date. Absolutely nothing on their
website indicates that any update of the files
took place.
But the file is completely different.
And on page six, all references to Israel
are now gone. There was no statement issued
or any acknowledgment at all that the files
were switched, but they were. The metadata confirms
it. And you could check right here for
yourself. It says, of course, some of us
were keeping receipts. I have a copy of
the original file, which, by the way, I
just showed you, which you make and download.
But it goes on to say, nothing on
the main website indicates a change,
even the date remains the same, but we
can prove they altered it. Right? What he's
saying is, but the changes did occur as
confirmed by a side by side examination, which
we just showed you. Right? It says, there
has been zero commute
communication
from the DHS on this, even an acknowledgment
that the records were changed. Now that this
policy has apparently changed because I'm increasingly annoyed
that I spent so much time working on
it, the report, only for the policy to
be changed, apparently, I myself have a few
questions.
Does this file switch mean that the policy
is no longer in effect? Are the paper
copies I'm trying to what I gotta miss
the
hold on.
I was reading this earlier today. I can
just tell you. I was hoping to read
it in his words.
The point was that doing this without
acknowledging that shift violates the law.
And I think that's important to understand.
Try to find it.
The the point being is that they obviously
trying to hide this from you. Right? And
so that they're willing. But we that's not
shocking to anybody. Look at what they've been
doing in every other app every other aspect
of government.
They will lie right to your face. They'll
complete they'll rob, steal, and cheat. I mean,
that's what they do. I'll just continue. He's
in here somewhere.
He goes on to say,
are the paper copies of the policy that
were mailed to individual agencies still in effect?
Was this a mistake or deliberate action? If
this policy had not been discovered by the
public, would the DHS have deleted it on
their own by a volition? Who made the
decision to include the language in the text
and who approved it? If including the language
was a mistake, then how did this happen?
If it was a mistake, then why did
it take four months for identifying correct? Was
there any cases where the purchase of disaster
relief equipment was denied based on the entity
failing to profess support for Israel? Does deleting
the file without any comment or explanation constitute
a de facto acknowledgment of guilt? Are there
any other policies that the government agencies responsible
for the issuance of grants in states which
have similar policies? Yes is the answer there.
It's very clear. And they even just they
again, they already made it clear that they
will do that anyway.
How am I how am I missing this?
There was a point in this that I
swear I was reading or maybe it's in
this one.
I guess not. I must be you know,
maybe I'm a mistaken. I was reading on
a secondary tweet. Either way, the point is
the same. Just I'm try I was just
hoping to read it from the way the
person wrote it that I'm remembering, is the
ideas that they have these things posted and
for them to alter them and not update
it. In fact, to hide the fact that
it changed,
there there there's a this is a there's
a legal reality of how the government is
supposed to upkeep these this information. And by
not denoting that, they're violating the law. But
so here, what it shows you is the
metadata is very clearly shows you that they
did alter this.
And I just think that speaks volumes, guys.
It really does.
Maybe one last sweep here. So this person
said, according to DHS, it seems the pulse
is still in effect. Only the unpopular wording
was removed.
But here we are,
where, again, as I can see, it still
seems to show it
right now.
So if they added this back,
I think that says so much more than
everything else together.
That almost like they maybe that you won't
look again, and then it's back there. But
I'm gonna follow-up on this the next couple
shows and see if this updates.
But the reality is that the you know,
and then going back to Jones, the rest
going good news. They pulled it back. But
even if they removed the text, they made
it clear that they're not doing that. So
recognize people like that who are just absolute
team sport cheerleaders who will go along with
whatever their team says even when you can
prove that they're lying to you.
Actually, I wanna I wanna make sure I
save these. We'll come back to it.
Alright. So last point,
even though a lot of this already kind
of highlights what's going on with this, is
that
the Israeli infiltration of this government is it's
never been more clear. I'm gonna start with
a clip here from a former
from a veteran from the USS Liberty,
who, by the way, pretty much every one
of them you can listen to right now,
many of them are still alive, will absolutely
complete they'll stand there and tell you right
to your face that Israel attacked the US
government and the US government covered it up.
And they'll all lie to you about this
today from the government,
like everything else, by the way. But this
and this is Philip Torni.
He he says, we've succeed we've we've ceded
our power to a foreign country, he says.
Israel
controls us.
We don't control our country.
Guys, I'm not saying you have to blindly
listen to this or believe it or but
if you're not considering this by now with
people like this, people with I mean, ever
I mean, they're you're getting people like Glenn
Greenwald and George Gallo. People are starting to
call out the ridiculousness
of how of how obvious this is. Now
none of that should ever mean that I'm
gonna blindly believe it. They could all be
wrong. I could be wrong, but consider it.
Look into the information provided. Look look through
this lens. When you look at this stuff
today, it's it's impossible to miss.
Now let's start with this clip. And by
the way, this,
Afshan,
Afshan Rezani, I was having trouble saying his
name for some reason, from, going underground. This
clip has been going around.
A former Israeli intelligence officer.
Oh, you know what? Let me grab the
clip of it since it's I was gonna
make a point about it. I'll play this
first. It's just simply telling you that presidents
of the past were infiltrated by Israel, and
I think it's funny that you've got people
like Jones going, breaking. This has happened, and
they know it's gone on for years. And
I feel like just going, oh, you're so
brave. You're so brave for jumping in when
now it's the most obvious It's the dangerous
safe, right? Dangerous, dangerous. We were back there
going, look at this. Look at what's going
on. Whitney's writing books about it. Pay attention.
Right? Getting disorganized. Now, it's everyone's seeing it
and they're jumping in. I was telling you
earlier, people standing on the shoulders or anybody
else, that's what they're all trying to do
now. Trying to jump to the top and
go, we always knew, even though they really
did not, or they did and they hid
it from you. Here's the first clip.
See anything in God's image that brings me
to my knees
With sorrow,
pain,
for innocence,
being starved and robbed and burned, beat up
and raped and robbed.
I'm tired of it.
This whole country should be tired of it.
Our passion and attachment to the design of
state has got to stop. Our biggest disappointment
is our own government.
We've succeeded our power to a foreign
country. Israel controls us. They control the congress.
They control the senate.
They control our money.
We don't control our country.
The Zionist state does.
Does that make them
the real bad people? No. The real bad
people are the people who let them do
it.
That's the people. Real bad people.
People out there are starting to call this
stuff out. Now here's the clip that if
it was below that, which is, I mean,
it's not new. I mean, it's not even
new in the context of Uber. I mean,
that you we've seen a lot of former
Israeli officials come out and tell you stuff
like this or tell you that they're funding
a loss or tell you any number of
things that are still challenged by the corporate
media. Now,
Afshin Ratzani has been doing great work on
this for a long time, interviewing people like
this. But here it is, former Israeli intelligence
officer tells going underground that Israel trapped
multiple US presidents, which we know. Rather, I
think I should the evidence clearly shows us
that we've been reporting for a long time
as highly likely in regard to the Israeli
infiltration of our governments, and we can literally
see that Israel is influencing US policy. And
so when this kind of thing is tweet
shared by somebody like Jones and saying, oh,
it's important to see. Just recognize that's my
point about people that Johnny come lately is
the jump on this. And they've been trying
to, in my opinion,
gaslight and cover up around this story. Now
that it's impossible to miss, you've gotta start
stepping on it and acting like you always
saw it, which is typical. But add to
it to realize this is I mean, we've
played,
which one was it? I mean, you know,
Ihu Barak,
plenty of others that have said some
similar statements about infiltration. Even Netanyahu
leaked documents or leaked videos where he talks
about being able to pit one side of
the paradigm against the other. Get the left
to fight the right and control the US
government. He's talked about this before. It's not
new. Look. Whether it happens or not Hold
on. That's that's for next that's the next
clip.
There it is.
And so Jeffrey Epstein, in a way,
presumably being used as a tool
by the Israelis helped to change the course
of history in this region I'm speaking to
you from?
Of course. They changed,
I think, and
they trapped
a number of,
US presidents
by using Jeffrey Epstein.
And it wasn't only about sex. It was
also
the money issue. Where was the money coming
from?
Yeah. It's the financial,
links. First
Financial issue, different personalities,
receiving money from,
a billionaire
a group of billionaire Jews that worked with
the Israeli government
in The United States.
Oh, you mean like Miriam Adelson? And so
Right. Right. Like like like sorry.
Like, literally, the the largest backer in regard
to that discussion of oligarchs of Donald Trump,
at least as we can see.
Bring this up first. We'll come back to
that.
This is just this is her ex. Oh,
hold on. I hate these things.
This is her ex reporting that Mary Madelson
funds Donald Trump because she wants something. Her
condition,
West Bank annexation, which by the way is
already happening. Mike Johnson, and we're gonna show
it in a second, was just at an
illegal West Bank
occupation,
chewing around like it's no big deal, like
he's at Disneyland.
Those they're even according to the US government,
that's illegal, even though all of this is
illegal. But so this is what he just
described. So if your point this is how
they've infiltrated governments or presidents,
well, there you go. It's exactly what he
just told you.
But, you know, I don't need to convince
you guys. This is not secret, guys. It's
very public.
So even George Galloway, and I'm I'm only
saying it like that because I wouldn't have
expected people at certain positions and levels, even
though I think everyone should because it's honest
and accurate, to have called something like this
out, even though it's a valid point, because
of how easy it is for people to
call it racist, even though I don't think
it is at all. So here is what
George Galloway said. This started going around on
the third and the fourth. People showed Mike
Johnson and a hell of a lot of
others going to pray at the Wailing Wall.
And this one says, Mike Johnson bowing to
the Western Wall today. America is a slave
of Israel. Now this that one thing does
not prove that.
Maybe just showing respect. Right? You could argue
that. I don't think that. But the reality
being is you could easily argue this is
them just, you know, showing reverence for why
they're there. But here's what George says, which
is really what I think adds to the
point. Perfectly normal for a Christian. Right? That
it's this is something that plenty of Christians
will do.
Third highest personage in The United States Of
America. He goes, I mean, where else is
he supposed to pray on vacation?
I mean, the church where Jesus lay is
all of a 100 yards away.
Come to think of it, why do these
people never post pictures there?
You see? Now that doesn't again, you could
maybe there's a reason. The point though is
that if you're gonna talk about this as
a Christian, not a Christian Zionist, but a
Christian in general,
and that you go here and instead of
going to one of the most holy locations
where where Jesus literally,
as he writes, the the church where Jesus
lay,
and instead go to this place every time
because it's something that Israel wants to promote,
I think that speaks volumes. Now, again, on
just taking it to that point forward. Like
I said earlier, you could simply argue that
people in positions of power recognize Israel's influence
over our government as lobbyists or whatever else
and do this because they they I mean,
they'll say this out loud. Got people in
in congress, rather when they're not in position,
will make it clear that you have to.
Israel is sort of a kingmaker in our
Congress. That's not a secret. They just make
it about allies, but it's clearly more than
that. So, the point is you could simply
make it about influence and that they do
this because they know Israel will get them
elected or not, which in and of itself
is insane to think about. But we know
that it's more than that. We know this
goes beyond just that this is about control.
And I think that becomes very clear that
now everyone's starting to see the weirdness of
this, and it started to get circulated.
Henry Henry
Fejord says The US president and the next
two in line of succession,
Vance
and Johnson.
They're all praying at the wall. And Caitlin
Johnson said, this is extremely weird. And it's
extremely weird to pretend it's not extremely weird.
I'm just it's just interesting. And she was
saying that same point, by the way. That
weird little thing they did with Trump and
that globe in Saudi Arabia. But the point
is simply that this is starting to be
called out, and and people are not afraid
to be called racist because mostly I think
in most cases, they're not. I think that
there's general sentiment. I think that's the case.
The reality is they're just going, that's strange
to me and aren't afraid to be called
out by people trying to claim you're racist
by simply acknowledging the obvious.
And here's even people like Guntherman.
Or excuse me, Gunther Eagleman, all these blind
TeamSport followers
who even there started to go, okay, like,
I can't just lose everything.
You know, my guy they're gonna start calling
the thing. I think it's weird to see
how they have been holding this line, and
all of a sudden, they start pulling away.
He says, still haven't heard back from speaker
Johnson. Like, so this feels to me like
Johnson is the scapegoat.
If Johnson's the one, they're gonna start trying
to make it out to be the problem.
Not anybody else. Don't look at anybody else.
Even though it's like, honestly,
almost everybody else in the in his administration
is far far for like, at least presented
forward as blindly pro Zionist.
But I I think he's in the same
boat for sure. He says he lied to
me and everyone else on Twitter space.
Shocking.
A politician lied to you?
Wow. I mean, think about what a naive
thing that is to say. Did Gunther think
they were always telling the truth? They're politicians,
bud. And it says, when he said the
recess would be spent in his district. Yeah.
Because they're liars, man. And clearly, it was
about Epstein, I think. But either way, there's
probably more going on. Nick Sorter goes, now.
Mike Johnson, Israel, at the western wall, wearing
a kippah. See, he doesn't this is what
I keep trying to point out about some
of them. They don't go off like they
usually would in other context context if it
was a Democrat. You know, going, I can't
believe it looks so I can't believe this
too. They just kind of state the thing
and just don't say anything about it because
you don't you don't I didn't mean anything
bad by it. But knowing that this is
something that people want him to call out
or at least to think to to be
perceived as calling out.
I think these are blind. These people are
tiptoeing around the story because they don't wanna
lose what they've gained. They're not, I don't
think any of these people are truly in
your interest.
My opinion. But they're all going after Mike
even though all of them have done it.
Isn't that strange?
Glenn Greenwald says, more America First, House Republicans,
make pilgrimage to Israel.
This is all from today and yesterday. And
and over you know, they're there over the
couple days, but this has all been really
focused on all these different politicians are in
Israel right now. Why? Why does that always
seem to happen? And it says, a pilgrimage
to Israel in order to, in the words
of the totally American lobbyist group, APAC, he's
being facetious,
to, quote, being their week begin, he meant,
begin their week long educational seminar in Israel.
What?
It says Mike Johnson is there. They should
hold US congressional committee votes in Tel Aviv.
That's Glenn Greenwald.
AIPAC hosting the message of your politicians telling
you why they love Israel. It's just it's
just so insane right now. And And here's
the interesting overlap to all this. This is
the Homeland Security account, dhs.gov.
Here's what it literally says. It's quoting Theodore
Roosevelt, you know, when they like to selectively
apply to certain things. It says, quote, there
is no room in this country for,
hyphenated Americanism.
Americanism is a matter of the spirit and
of the soul.
Our allegiance
must be purely to The United States. This
is what they're writing. We must unsparingly condemn
any man who holds any other allegiance.
And then they post the blaze document that
says, representative Delia Ramirez at the summit in
Mexico City this week tells the audience in
Spanish, I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an
American.
And that's what they choose to make the
issue about. Sort of like the ones all
head faking toward the Somalia discussion.
Look, the reality is, for those of us
being honest about this, it's not just about
Israeli citizenship, but any other foreign country, which
is what Massey put forward, what anybody real
about this is putting forward.
These people are so embarrassingly desperate to hide
the one thing, like we just saw with
the Israel aid discussion,
to make just going, oh my god. We
can't allow that. They support Mexico instead of
The United States. Like, we don't all see
what you're doing.
And look, the reality is the same point
because we're not all children like you, DHS.
The reality that if she is an a
Mexican citizen, which I believe she is, and
she's working or rather Guatemalan, and she's working
for the US government, That either matters or
it doesn't, guys. We either care about people
who have second a a citizenship from another
government, which I think should matter, or we
don't.
Clearly, we all seem to recognize that the
even our government says that, but only doesn't
when it comes to Israel.
I mean, these these points today just scream
for themselves.
I don't know how anyone can misunderstand that.
And on top of it, how embarrassing is
that they will come after this or Somalia
as if that's the only thing we can
see when it is
the whole world can see the I mean,
you've Brian Mass marching down congress in his
IDF uniform.
It's wild.
It's
I've never seen it this
shockingly clear in my entire life.
Like, I mean, this conversation,
I've never seen this as obvious as it
is right now. It's just absolutely insane.
Oh, another point. That's right.
Let me grab this. Hold on.
This is Vivek Ramaswamy, which is interesting. I
haven't you know, he's kind of drifted away.
Like, well, I think it seems he made
the right choice and got the got his
got his name out of the way before
all this went real crazy.
Because, I mean, he's a grifter in his
own right. We saw the way he manipulated
the bio field the bio the, pharmaceutical field,
lied, you know, kind of a pump and
dump in pharmaceutical world and just, you know,
it's it's these people are grifters, man. But
he says, shocking to hear a member of
congress
openly states her loyalty to another country. Are
you joking?
I mean, that's insane.
There I've never seen more politicians, whether they're
Israeli citizens or not, stand up and declare
loyalty to a foreign country
than Israel at anything I've ever seen in
my life. And yet here he is making
this point like it just screams the opposite
of what they're trying to do. If your
primary allegiance is to a different nation, then
you shouldn't be allowed to make laws and
bind Americans. You're right, Vivek.
That's not controversial. It's obvious. You're right.
Now, dabble into the comments and see what
literally everybody's pointing out to you. Everybody.
He knows. He's not stupid. He's part of
the problem, I think. So here's Caitlin Johnstone
showing you that problem.
This woman, just one example of what we're
being shown still to this day,
is such a disgusting manipulative liar, she writes.
It is still it still astonishes me, she
writes, how brazenly,
how shamelessly Israel's defenders lie all the time.
Now it's worth considering that some of them
might just actually believe these lies because they
don't look outside their
trusted sources.
But either way, I mean, it's that's your
responsibility seeing as how public all of this
is right now. It says all of them,
every single one of them without a single
solitary exception, they're just stunningly evil. She said
she said, I've never gotten used to it.
So you're gonna hear lay out these narratives
that are just insanely wrong,
that we can prove every which way. I
mean, I was just I was just calling
out, Randy Fine, another supposed America First politician
who in every way puts Israel first,
lying about October 7 still, saying 1,200 people.
That number hasn't they put that down early
from Israel, and yet they all still
keep saying their false number or claiming that
they were all killed by Hamas. We we
know that's not true now easily.
They're the kind of people that still talk
about beheaded babies. Like, they're they are,
like, the most compromised, if that's even you
know, it's hard. These are my opinions,
But I it just shows you that they
are like, I'll just put it this way.
In my opinion,
there are people that are compromised, blackmailed,
right, or or get, you know, coerced
into supporting them.
They're the ones that just actually support them,
regardless of a genocide.
And that's what I think Randy Fine is.
He is on their team. And I don't
mean even in regard to religion. I'm talking
about what they're accomplishing from a government perspective.
It's clear that he doesn't need to be
coerced. At least that's what I would argue.
This person on CNN is laying out the
false narrative just like that.
Happens or not
well, look. Whether it happens or not, frankly,
the truth is Israel should have never left
Gaza because before 02/2005, we did not have
a terrorist state. We had a booming economy.
We Oh, it's all it's all all BS.
And the reality is they didn't leave Gaza.
Right? They've always occupied it. They pulled out
their people. And in fact, also forcefully removed
all the Jewish people that live there as
well. And this is just like everywhere else
we're talking about, she goes on a lie
about the reality of that. You know? And
people keep doing this online, like, where are
all the Christians? Where are all well, guess
what, guys? Syria, for example, had the third
largest Christian population of all the Middle East
until Israel and United States destroyed it. Same
thing with Iraq. A huge,
they destroyed these things. And you can kinda
systematically show that Israel has been focusing on
the Christian populations pretty much everywhere they go.
Same thing with Syria, by the way, right
now. So these people are either just that
stupid, that blind, or that dishonest.
And equality for the sexes. We didn't have
five. We did not have a terrorist state.
We had a booming economy. We had equality
for the sexes. We didn't have gays being
That doesn't even exist in Israel right now,
by the way. They will you're not allowed
to marry, like, you can have a relationship,
I guess, but it's frowned upon, but you're
not Alan McLeod pointed that out. Think about
all those lies they push, and it's it's
just so they're all the appraising the good
thing. That's not even the reality there. Thrown
off rooftops, but when Israel dragged every last
man, woman, and child as out of Gaza
and exhumed the dead bodies because they knew
Oh, you you'll excuse her for for meaning
only the Jewish population. Even though she says
every man, woman, and child,
she forgets that all the Palestinian men, women,
and child, children, they're there still. Oops.
But to these people, they're not real. They
don't exist. They're not human.
As Megyn Kelly will tell you, they'll lie.
They'd rather watch their children starve than help
than, you know, not kill Jews or whatever
the way she framed it as. Like it's
insane
levels of sociopathy
or or just
hate. It's crazy. What Hamas would do with
it. We had a terror state, and that's
a big mistake, and the world is yet
to admit that. And the real question is,
why is the world preventing
Gazans from leaving
Gaza? Why are they insisting
that they remain
as human hostages for I mean, this has
gotta be the dumbest person in the room
unless
she just thinks those lies will work. Right?
She is regurgitating
things that are that nobody believes, like, other
than lying propagandists.
Like, and or or why did the world
how does she frame that? Hit that. And
the real question is, why is the world
preventing
Gazans from a big mistake? And the world
is yet to admit that. To admit that
they're about like, you realize her argument that
the world doesn't argue that Hamas is a
terrorist group? I mean, literally, it seems everybody,
even the ones that are trying to support
the armed resistance point, they're still not arguing
that they're not armed. You know, it's just
a weird thing to reframe as
they're like, everyone's on the side of Gaza.
Well, today, that seems like it's growing to
that point, but that's not how this started.
But see, they have to continue to frame
it as the victim,
as always.
And the idea that we're that anybody is
forcing Palestinians to stay. You see how clumsy
this has gotten, where it starts with their
claiming that Hamas was forcing them to stay,
but that's clearly not working anymore. So they
just act like the world is just saying,
you have to stay there. It's just it's
just it's not only disgusting.
It's false.
But it's not only disgusting. It's it's you
are taking people who are putting their lives
on the line for what they truly believe
in and diminishing that to it's not even
their choice.
That apparently the rest of the world can
somehow decide what they do and do not
do.
She's a child.
And the real question is why is the
world preventing
Gazans from leaving
Gaza? Why are they insisting
that they remain
as human hostages for Hamas and as civilian
human shields? And the third point really is
are they refugees or are they not refugees?
Because if Gazans are Palestinian refugees,
then Gaza is not their home. Oh my
god. You see the ignorance of this? She
doesn't even understand what she's talking about.
The reality look. If you you are displaced
from your home, which is Greater Israel, and
moved to camps within parts of Gaza, that
that that is within parts of what was
Palestine.
And you still literally have the keys in
some cases to the homes they took. UNRWA,
which you probably have no idea you call
it a terrorist organization, was literally there in
order to this is way how it began,
to keep track of the right of
return. And they kept and and because this
was not supposed to be something that went
on for decades and decades.
They're supposed to once the fighting stopped, let
them go back to their homes as international
law requires.
And they never ever allowed that, and they
kept denying it, and they kept pushing it
away. And in fact, today, we can prove
that when they were killing many of these
people, they were demanding that they give facial
scans and give back their keys and denounce
on video that they had any right to
return. You know, the thing that they kept
pretending wasn't true. So to argue somehow that
because they're refugees that they never lived in
the I mean, guys, it's just
I just I don't even have words to
express what a disgusting thing that is. And
here they are on the main channel, and
some people still fall for this stuff. And
they should be relocated so that they are
not used by Hamas as human shields. If
they are if Gaza is their home, then
the entire premise upon which the whole Israeli
Palestinian conflict
is based and the right of return is
false. The only people being deliberately
starved in Gaza are the hostages right now.
Can you even believe this? This is back
this is countered by every data point we
have. Like, for example, the fact that every
single hostage that has come out, say for
a couple that were slightly less, you know,
not they weren't emaciated,
not a single one.
They come out and they're saying we were
fed. They took care of us. Now, realize,
guys, even they will be diminished because they're
denying food for everyone.
The argument is somehow that the only people
suffering like, how do you even make that
make sense about all the Palestinians?
Isn't your argument, alternatively, that got the Hamas
is doing stealing from Palestinians?
So then how can you argue that not
any Palestinian is suffering? Like, you see this
this is driven by pure hatred and dehumanization
of who these people are. But yet at
the same time, when it works for your
gross narrative, you make it out to be
you protecting the Palestinians that you secondarily think
are gross and act like they're all terrorists
when it suits your narrative.
Kills me. Now I think this guy is
about to jump in and make some points.
You look at Evitar David. He looks like
a concentration camp
survivor who is forced to dig his own
grave in the Oh, you mean that new
image that came out? Well, yes. Because people
there are all starving to death. Every single
one of them because you're not letting food
in for any of them.
And yet now you make it about and
what about every single one of them before
that? You see, she is not I mean,
oh, I can't I don't know who she
is, but
people with the most basic intelligence or someone
who claims to be following the story is
probably aware, as Caitlin's pointing out, all the
other hostages have different stories.
Rather, the same story. All of them telling
you they were fed. And so she comes
out and lies
and lies to continue genocide, lies to continue
starvation
of children, lies to continue rape and torture
and everything else. That is who she is.
The body of Eden Yulshami after she was
murdered was returned, she was seventy pounds.
Contrast that to the pictures, these, I'll say,
artistic pictures
of children, most of them with pre con
you know, artistic
pictures?
My god. Where did they find these people?
Is it? Alright. Alright. Really, Brooke? Yes. Really.
I mean, really, you you you propaganda pictures
of these people.
Pictures of
And and Are you kidding me? You see,
she doesn't even know what she's talking about.
There is an endless procession of starving adults.
There's an endless procession of starving children with
and without secondary conditions. But does that somehow
make it not a problem that you're starving
children with special needs?
These are she's just following along with these
disgusting Zionist talking points. Emma is not selective,
Peter. You can't have a child who's starving
and then the mother is
overweight or the brother is fully fed.
The picture of Eviatar David was horrifying.
You are we really debating whether people are
starving in Gaza? No. We're debating who is
No. But because it sounds like you're saying
that these are made up in the desert.
Responsible? Oh, okay. You wanna okay. Any food
shortages. So let's acknowledge that there are people
Before I even answer, you already know the
answer, guys, because it's been ISIS linked groups
that Israel's been working with that we've proven
10 times over that Robert broke down for
you, that we had an interview about, that
we've been proving before that. They were the
ones that were passing through the they were
being forced to pass through because the way
Israel designed the earliest aspect of this, and
they were stealing food and selling at higher
prices. And now those groups that, by the
way, the reason you can prove it is
because their own the Knesset made these statements
are the same groups that we're doing working
with before that are ISIS linked and are
now running the GHF.
They said that in public or rather in
in their Knesset, their congress
or the parliament.
So, we know that.
And they're the groups that are executing people
in light in broad daylight on video that
that Green Berets and World Food Programme are
telling, we watched them shoot at them, and
this kind of person is trying to gaslight
you into ignoring all of that.
Start with a goddamn Hamas responsible? Why don't
you I think you should let me finish
because you spoke to that you let me
finish last time. Does Hamas
steal food and use it as a food
restaurant? For a long time. Here, go say
something. Steal food? The Palestinian in Gaza the
Palestinian in Gaza are indeed refugees.
It's true. Most they they are the descendants,
most of them, of the of the families
that were expelled from Israel in 1948.
So if Gaza is not habitable for them,
because Israel has destroyed most of the schools,
most of the churches, most of the mosques,
most of the bakeries, most of the agriculture.
Look at the contempt on her face. Look
at her smug.
Mhmm. Mhmm.
Like, this is what Caitlin was talking about.
There's the there's a there's a decorum here
that you can have whether you disagree or
not. She is discussed. I don't I have
no idea who she is. I'm speaking specifically
to what you're watching her do. That speaks
so much about who she is as a
person. Now whether it's just because she's misinformed
and doesn't wanna be wrong, the point is
you're still recognizing
contradictions
and powering through because you care more about
being right, if that's the case, than you
do about being wrong about death children being
starved to death.
It's too much, guys.
Too much. I mean, it just it's
too much. Alter most of the universities. Then
they should be allowed to return to the
places from which they're from, which is not
Burundi or Somalia or Rwanda.
It's it's Israel. Right? If you wanna give
them a place to go out of Gaza,
allow them to go back to the places
from which their families work spelled. Think you
have a problem with cause and effect. You
like to blame Israel for everything. Israel did
not destroy As always, you make a very
specific valid point about the historical facts.
You just blame Israel.
And what where in there did he blame
it? You you obviously being logical, you can
understand that that stems back to Israel's not
the Nakba, but he didn't say that.
Her her reaction is step one, anti semite.
Step two, you hate Israel. It's it's just
the same old stupid cycle. She's clearly not
that intelligent. She's not holding arguments very well,
and that's probably why she's there. Destroy their
hospitals, destroy their schools. Yeah. The schools and
the hospitals that I've been to have been
used as places for rocket depots, and most
of those hospitals are are used as Hamas
for their head So she just pretended she's
been to Gaza?
You're a clown. Do you realize that nobody,
not even journalists are getting in there? Like,
think about how insane that is. This woman
deserves to be made fun of through all
of social media. Please please somebody pick this
up. She just actually pretended, lied about being
in Gaza and seeing the depots, which, by
the way, are false. For a thousand reasons
we've overlapped with it, even the UN groups
or even the human rights groups who have
had moments in there through different aspects of
opening have recognized that lie. She's pretending she's
been there,
Been in a militarized controlled zone where they're
executing people at will and seen these places
that nobody, not even journalists, have been allowed
to see.
This is the kind of BS you get.
It's you know, again, it's just whatever it
is. Driving her is either that she's been
driven. I mean, I don't I don't it's
not even worth assuming. My point is that
that she must recognize that somebody can think
that through unless she's just that stupid.
Quarters. Hamas is responsible. When you have your
headquarters
under a hospital
Where? A and you shoot Oh, you mean
Al Shefa? That's what she's referring to that
did not even remotely pan pan out. They
got laughed at and exposed.
They didn't
even the New York Times broke it down
is that they lied about the camp the
command center. She's just reporting things written down
on a piece of paper, guys. That's who
we're dealing with. Brock gets into a Where
is Israel's military headquarters?
Exactly.
And you shoot I have a question. Where
is Israel the Curia? Where is Israel's military
locator's headquarters? Is it a remote area? Israel
has military No. No. No. No. Answer the
question. Everywhere. Where is the where is the
target? No. No. Are they are they are
they are You didn't answer my question. Where
is the They are already coming down south
towns everywhere.
And by the way, she just said they're
they're
they're targets.
Weird weird response.
So you just claimed that Israel's Tel Aviv
central downtown area is a legitimate target because
they put a base there, which there's a
that's a debatable argument, but that's definitely not
what Zionist wanted to say. Let me say
that. They they have a in Tel Aviv.
You got a message. Israel's military headquarters Mhmm.
Is in Downtown
Tel Aviv. Right? Many of the apartment buildings
in Tel Aviv house Israeli generals.
Under international law,
you don't have the right to destroy the
schools around Israel's military headquarters or to destroy
it's not.
Tel Aviv into civilian occupation. Israel has its
military
military infrastructure
deeply embedded within the civilian
infrastructure
as well. And in international law, it would
be a war crime to destroy a hospital
or an apartment building in Tel Aviv because
an Israeli general or in or art is
there. Yep. Similarly, it is a violation of
international law. She's shaking her head because she's
wrong, by the way, and just doesn't know
what to say. She's wrong. That's the same
point made in the very beginning.
Whether or not there are people in Gaza,
they bombed every hospital, every school, everything. And
they regardless of their narrative, even half the
time the narratives they gave still didn't make
it legal
or collective punishment. They alter the same point
as they just kept going, well, they're there.
Every single example you could prove, they were
breaking the law. They didn't care. To destroy
a hospital or university or school in Gaza
just because you believe that there are a
bomb out. Violation of international
law to use civilians as human shields. Can
we agree on that? Yes. And that is
Do you swear to that?
Violation of Gaza so that they're not the
God forbid, I do not. Human shields. So
you think that Gaza is again? The Palestinians
were expelled in 1948. You want to expel
them again? No. That's a war crime. That's
not what I say. What I say. What
I say. What I say. Temporary temporary. You
think Israel's gonna allow them back if they
leave? Come on. Alright. I wanna bring others
into the Yeah. She she you see her
mouth's going dry. You can see her. It's
just funny. Like, she's clearly outside of her
zone. She is not I I I think
the reason you get her is the same
reason you get Nome and Bondi and Hegseth
in the executive branch because nobody wants to
be in these positions because it's ridiculous.
Whether it's because you don't wanna blindly support
a foreign country over your own or because
they act like morons and and lie and
make you look like a clown because your
principles don't matter. You know? Tulsi Gabbard comes
out and says, this is what matters. And
Trump's like, I don't care what she thinks.
And then through some weird shame ritual, she's
forced to post her own video that says
what he says doesn't matter, and she says
that's not what it means. And you can
watch it where it literally says what she
says doesn't mean. It's just it's just insane
what we're watching right now. And I agree
with cap Caitlin. These Caitlin Johnstone. These these
people are disgusting
and very disgusting.
Now I just retweeted this again. I just
said, seems today more than ever, the veil
is being removed and people are seeing what
the Israeli government is doing. The genocide and
the infiltration of US government and others. So
I will repost this thread of just Trump
and just before this election, which I do
think is very relevant to what's going on.
As always, watch him for yourself. An endless
thread of the many times just not all
of them, by the way, but before the
process
where he's telling you he will act for
Israel's interest over your own.
Now, talking about infiltration,
this is a really at very insightful
post here. Now, this is a a clip
from mainstream media in France. French, French, what
is it? French twenty four.
Yeah. France, France Twenty Four. And the point
is, it's, you know, not some fringe place,
which you guys probably know. France twenty four
is a large platform.
They caught
settlers or rather I mean, I I would
argue probably intelligence, but some Israeli assets
who were dressed up like Palestinians,
initiated throwing rocks at the IDF,
and then in the midst of doing so,
turned around and opened fire with their guns
and arrested Palestinians.
Nothing new. The reality is not just that
they were there, but they are the ones
that create the problem and then use that
to go after Palestinians. And it's not new.
It's actually a very common practice, and it's
something that we'll show you here even, like,
as as, president Paul Tano's talking about.
Disguise themselves as doctors and female nurses to
infiltrate hospitals, which, by the way, you've already
seen. That happened right here during this during
the ongoing October,
where they broke in, dressed like Palestinians, summoned
wheelchairs, and then executed people in hospital beds.
No matter who they were, that's a violation
of the law.
But here's the clip. As the squirrel points
out, look carefully at this video captured by
French TV crew without the Israelis knowing it.
A group of Palestinians are gathered for a
protest, then four of them pick up rocks
and throw them at the Israeli soldiers. But
they are not Palestinians. They're Zionist, Zionist Jews,
in disguise.
And they suddenly turn around and begin shooting
the Palestinian and beating and torturing them to
death.
Another day for Palestinians.
For at least half an hour, the four
men had been throwing stones at Israeli soldiers
as part of a group of Palestinians.
Then they took out their pistols
and opened fire on the group of protesters
they'd been standing alongside moments before. Okay. Look
at it, guys. Right? So there's two things
to consider here. One,
well, that any number of Mossad agents or
Israelis have similar colored skin. Secondarily,
that they also, as Robert's pointed out many
times,
very much utilize
Palestinian infiltrators.
People that are willing to work from Assad
to get a better home or a better
access to things. Like, that's that's that's that's
reality. Collaborators, rather, is the way to put
it. So what you're seeing regard whichever way
that goes are people that are working for
Israel.
Right? That literally start throwing rocks at the
IDF and then just turn around and open
fire on the people they're with.
And then and then and then well, let
me let me finish the clip first. And
opened fire on the group of protesters
they'd been standing alongside moments before.
And dragging away this guy, which is probably
what it was about. The AFP journalist who
filmed what happened at the Baydale checkpoint outside
the Republic.
So right there, my gut would tell me
that that's who it was about. They set
this all up. They got them in a
position where they were doing what, really, what
the IDF did to themselves and then use
that as the justification to go after the
person they wanted to get. Sounds very similar
to the FBI.
A cry of Mustarabeen
soon spread through the 100 strong crowd.
It's a word that describes people who disguise
themselves as Arabs. In the footage, the infiltrators
are seen beating a man and shooting their
guns before being joined by Israeli soldiers in
uniform.
Look at that.
Entrapment in anybody?
Well, it goes on to say,
the genocidal Israeli death cult death and rape
cult, he writes, operates vast network of Zionist
Jews who disguise themselves as Palestinians called, as
they were just saying, Musta,
Musta Rabin.
They infiltrate Palestinian communities, sow discord, hatred. They
blackmail. They rape. They murder. They torture sadistic
beasts. Now, look. This this is not a
secret.
Israeli agents who pose as Palestinians. Now you
can't you should never assume that everything bad
you see therefore is Israeli mis agents. But
realize, this is what they do and have
many cases like that been caught doing the
kind of things they then go, that's what
Palestinians do. If you can't by now see
that this is the way Zionism operates, where
they literally create I mean, you whether it
stems from that they really think that or
not or just wanna frame them for what
they want people to see them as, this
is a like, what what's what's the Mas'ad
state? Through through deceit, thou shall make war
or some paraphrasing? That's what their motto is,
guys.
So it goes on. This is a clip
from,
John Mycharmer and and,
judge Paul Tano.
He's saying that they
the agents also routinely disguise themselves as doctors
and female nurses to infiltrate hospitals to mass
murder patients.
Being a part of the military force and
disguising yourself as a civilian is perfect, perfidy,
I think, which is one of the most
disgusting and depraved war crimes,
But they don't care. Again, the country is
literally praised by the corporate media when they
did it right here in Gaza.
That's how disgusting this is. Here's the clip
for first of John, Napolitano.
Oh, wait.
I guess I missed it somehow.
Let me grab that.
I'm sure I probably got it and just
didn't miss it. I'll find it right now.
It's frustrating when I do this, and it
ends up being something I did have.
Still, I I do as I'm grabbing this,
I do find it interesting.
The
I don't know if you would call it
transition, but, you know, judge the Paul Tano
has been very critical of a lot of
this stuff, and I think it's I'm I'm
glad to see that.
Let's do
there you go.
I just wonder what conservatives may think about
it. You know, think it's critical of Trump
is not really popular for a lot of
a lot of conservatives.
Yeah. I did miss it. How funny. Here
it is.
Have you ever,
heard or read about in your studying of
modern warfare of,
soldiers or intelligence agents,
males, dressing as females, dressing as, health care
workers,
going into a hospital
and shooting in the head three patients
who were being ministered to by health care
workers in the hospital.
My god. Look at this clip. It's like
it's like thirteen second fifteen seconds delayed.
What is going on? I just it's I
shouldn't I just stopped bringing it up, but
I'm sorry about that, guys. Apparently, it's completely
outside of my control.
I could literally screen, caption, and play it
for you on my computer, and it would
play perfectly. But when I upload it to
StreamYard, it gives me, like, a whole delay.
Anyway, this is about the case we just
showed you of when they did this in
Gaza. That's what they're talking about.
Again, I apologize for the lack of
coordination with the audio and the visual.
I've never heard of an instance of that,
and,
I'm not surprised that the Israelis did it.
I think the Israelis
don't pay
any attention, any serious attention to the rules
of war, and they think they can do
pretty much anything they want and get away
with it because The United States will protect
them.
And I also think that I mean, one
of the things I find most disturbing
about watching what's happening in Gaza
is it's it's not just simply the killing.
I mean, that's categorically
depressing. Don't misunderstand me. But it's also just
the cruelty that's involved here.
The Israelis
seem to take a certain joy in inflicting
punishment,
inflicting cruelty on the Palestinians.
And,
it's just horrible,
what's going on. And this is just another
instance of them just not caring at all
about the basic rules of the game
and doing whatever they think is necessary
and oftentimes doing it in a very cruel
and evil way.
Let me know in the chat, by the
way, anybody watching right now. Was that out
of sync on your side?
If that hasn't been the case, let me
know. Maybe it's just something on my side.
I'm just confounded by that. It's it's just
one of those things that you know, you
know, you know me by now probably enough.
These things just get under my skin. You
know? These little tiny things like that. You
know, it's it's a lack of control. The
fact that it's something like that that keeps
happening that I can't do anything about drives
me crazy. But let me know if that
was out of sync for you.
It's it's just very strange. Like, here, I
wonder if I can get let's watch this.
Here is
the video I just downloaded. Have you ever
Okay. Now check it out. It's this is
just on the browser. You probably can't hear
it otherwise through my mic. But look, it's
it's in sync.
Heard or read about in your
studying of modern warfare of,
soldiers or intelligence
agents. I just think that's hilarious.
Anyway
so, yeah, to offer you guys too? Oh,
well, I guess that's the the world of
technocracy for us today. Now back to the
point. So we're talking about them,
basically, IDF members throwing rocks, and they others
join in, and then they turn around and
shoot Palestinians for what they initiated. Right? Well,
check this out. This is from the August
3.
And and and Patrick Henningsen says, yes. This
is the actual headline from the Israeli media
today. We're dealing with truly sick and deranged,
rabid society here. This level of institutionalized state
violence has no place in the twenty first
century civilized world. Photo proves
eliminated terrorist
was sick was was about to throw rock.
Why is that going just that way? That's
so weird. What's going on with my computer
today?
About to.
Photo proves
eliminated terrorist was about to throw rock. That
that's actually what that says. How insane is
that? And the point being,
isn't that what we just saw? And so
the question is, are are we and I'm
not saying it's this exact same incident. Maybe.
The point is that how how do we
know that that's what actually happened? How do
we not know that it was Palestinians or
rather IDF members pretending to be that threw
the rock and then came well, we just
saw that, didn't we? I just I agree
with them. I think there's a very real
problem. Let me look at this real quick.
See, that's weird. So I can zoom in
anywhere like that over here.
On this one, I can't. Let me refresh
it and see what happens.
Yeah. Now I can. So weird. Maybe maybe
my computer is the problem. Anyway, coming back
to this,
it's funny how somebody just laughed about this
with me the other day, how casual I
become with this, like, just and stuff like
that. I remember at one point, I was
just, like, terrified to go off the script.
It was such a long time ago. Not
the script in the sense of, like, actually,
the truth is when I first started this,
I did have, like, things written out because
I was afraid to, like, make, you know,
I was just super worried about, you know,
I think the best thing to do in
this for new people out there trying to
do it, just be yourself.
Be just go at it. Be who you
are. Be casual. People want honesty today, I
think.
It's why they're seeing all this, calling it
out. But so we're talking about them manipulating
all this, you know, the fake, the infiltration.
And
and I I think it's worth us playing
this clip yet again
from the pager attack and how they how
they describe what they do in regard to
infiltrating or having fake, you know, front companies
and that they think they can do this
anywhere in the world. I think this speaks
volumes to where we currently are and what
they're capable of doing. How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this?
Well, obviously See, this wasn't synced for me.
I don't know what the difference is. They
didn't know that they were buying it from
Israel. Who did they buy it from? Or
I think they were buying it from. We
have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that has no way been traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
I mean, guys, that's insane. Like, why would
why is she not going, what? Like, everyone
you do what they just made clear is
that they the Israeli government
is working through companies that we don't know
are their government, that are peppered across the
world, that they conduct operations through. How is
that? I mean, imagine if that was China
that said that. This it just shows you
how clearly this is not this there's a
problem here that goes to the highest levels
of power across the world,
but it is beginning to be seen. It's
beginning to diminish, at least as it appears
to be, at least from our view. That's
what they're telling you, though. They will do.
They'll infiltrate companies. They'll create fake companies. We
keep reporting that in multiple different ways. On
top of that, they believe they're above international
law as they've said publicly in the Knesset
more than once, and this shows you that.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
I mean, it doesn't even need comment.
That's the that's the quiet part out loud,
guys, and they are
shoving it in your face. Sixty minutes is
going good for you.
John Donald Trump goes, our ally.
And that's what they're showing you. Well, in
case you missed it, this is just one.
There's a I mean, the I think I
think it was seventy five percent of the
people hurt in those attacks were women and
children.
Here's one of them.
A young victim of Israel's pager attack. He
says, quote, I was playing on my phone
at home.
You mean? I was playing on my phone
at home. I heard the pager ring. I
didn't know that sound. I grabbed it and
barely had time to press okay before it
exploded.
Now this is not this wasn't a kid.
This isn't a kid that had you know,
his father is not some massive Palestinian terrorist.
Is he just a random kid? They tried
to make or rather specifically in in,
Lebanon. So, Hezbollah. The point though is that
there's plenty of examples of these kids that
were not, you know, connected to some government
thing or some Hezbollah. They were just a
random person who just happened to have one.
They lied about what they did. They, they
flooded these throughout Lebanon. And that's what Israel
does.
They want you to be scared. They look,
if you don't do what we say, this
is what's gonna continue. That's what terrorism is.
That is what's important to understand that that's
where this actually comes from.
What we understand as terrorism was born by
Zionism.
I think that's really important to understand. This
is it's it's been the case,
I mean, for so many other things. I'm
actually I'm gonna play this clip, and I'm
gonna play one at the end I think
is important around Zionism. I think the Zionists
have used it and brought it, in fact,
to the area. Terrorism as we know it
today, the planting of bombs in marketplaces and
so on and so forth, was, in fact,
introduced into the Middle East by the Zionists
in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
first third of the twentieth century has brought
forth,
to my mind, the the anomaly, the
horrific and unacceptable
status in The Middle East today of the
state of Israel, which is in fact an
armed garrison state, which now exports more arms
and distributes violence all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. There's no question about that.
Well, to wrap up here, guys,
here's Betsalem, which you already know. This is
actually not new for those that have been
watching the show. But in case you haven't
been, this is just a recent post
from 07/28/2025.
Betsalem, the leading Israeli human rights group.
Israel is committing genocide.
Just, you know, every single day, there's more
people that are beginning to find the courage
to call this out. Now they've been here
for a long time. There have been for
a long time. Just wanna make sure we
saw this as the new post. As Al
Rod points out, Israel just bombed the Red
Crescent headquarters. Nobody's I I barely even they're
they're not even reporting this stuff anymore. The
Red Crescent headquarters. They're just they they she
writes, they're still killing medics, and it barely
registers as news anymore because it's just that's
what they do. Apparently, no one cares anymore,
at least in the mainstream. As Aaron Mate
wrote, I don't think any state in history
has been given this degree of impunity to
carry out such incessant,
sadistic, genocidal evil as Israel has in Gaza.
Yet another photo of dead people
piled high every single day, and that's what
anti war will show you. Every single day,
hundreds of people are being killed, at least
as we can prove. Probably hell of a
lot more than that. This one, this is
from today. Israeli forces launched a heavy strike
with four missiles targeting the UNRRA clinic building
over and over and over.
This is a in Al Almo,
how do you say that? Makausi area, Gaza
City. The second strike in a short time.
Why? Are we still pretending that's Hamas? Are
we still pretending like there are tunnels and
human shields within this decimated sand, you know,
just completely just for everything in there is
destroyed.
Look at all the images coming out from
drones. It is gone.
And yet they're still relentlessly bombing them and
their crowds and their tents. And they're claiming
bad guys because these are monsters we're talking
about.
And lastly, I'll go over this more in
the next show. Netanyahu
plans full Israeli occupation of Gaza. That is
new. That's August 4 from antiwar.com.
Here's Khaleesi. Trump gives Israel green light for
full military occupation of Gaza.
Senior figure in Israeli office or Netanyahu's
office has confirmed that Israel has decided to
fully occupy Gaza.
Now we'll go into this more remotely tomorrow.
Same with Robert's points on this. But he
generally speaking, he says that there's only really
two possibilities, that this is a deception or
or Netanyahu has lost his mind. Meaning that
this isn't in their benefit
other than, like, a lot I mean, I
we've talked about this more more than once
in the past. That if this happens, even
with The US involvement, this crosses a line.
And then, ultimately, you're gonna see this kinda
spin out already with already losing essentially to
Lebanon, Syria, all the different things happening, all
the multi fronts of war. Or this is
a deception to man gain manipulate us into,
for example, moving Palestinians another place. But I'll
go through more of his logic in the
in in tomorrow. I'm gonna be doing an
interview with Robert coming up soon. The point
simply is this is what is being discussed
on mainstream media.
Occupation is coming.
Here's what Donald Trump said, and then we'll
end with a clip about this. But Trump
is telling you, whatever Israel wants to do
sure sounds like somebody who cares about international
law or totally isn't completely bound by what
Israel wants.
Israel reoccupying
all of Gaza has been has been suggested
by, some Israeli officials? Well, I don't know
what the suggestion is. I know that we
are we are there now trying He just
literally told you what it is. The occupation
of Gaza.
Clown. And to get people fed,
as you know, $60,000,000
was given by The United States fairly recently
to,
supply food and, a lot of Yeah. Which
was used to murder them just like with
the pier. And realize, guys,
he just said in a recent interview, and
I got nothing for it.
Like, trying to pray in certain context, in
certain venues, trying to make it look like
he's angry with that and we're pushing back
on Israel. No. You're not, man. I don't
care what kind of head fakes and narratives
you give. You're supporting the genocide just like
Biden did. You're funding it. You're continuing to
support it. You're not if you wanted to,
you could end this today.
Just like any other US president because you
control you there's a reason they need your
support here. No matter what your narratives are,
you keep supporting the genocide. A lot of
food, frankly, for the people of Gaza that
are obviously not doing too well with the
food.
And I know Israel is going to help
us with that in terms of distribution and
also Yeah. So what he means is the
new shift. We'll get into it tomorrow. The
shift away from the failing thing they're doing
now, which is just a, you know, a
fake effort to kill them to shift into
a new fake effort to kill them, and
that's what's gonna happen. And by the way,
with other groups that we've already shown you
are compromised.
Well, we're gonna we'll we'll gravitate away from
the ISIS linked groups that we were using
before to use other groups.
What's gonna happen? More killing of Palestinians than
the guys of aid.
Again, if we talk about action
and outcome,
why would we think otherwise? Every single time,
what they do is hurt them. And here
we are again.
Money.
We also have the Arab states are gonna
help us with that in terms of the
money and possibly distribution.
So, that's what I'm focused on. As far
as,
the rest of it, I really I really
can say that's gonna be pretty much up
to Israel. Yeah, please. Yeah. Yeah. It's up
to them whether they wanna violate international law
and keep committing a genocide,
which actually it is.
But the idea that you just blindly dismiss
that as some no except for them, that's
their boss, not my decision.
You are complicit in this genocide, Donald Trump
and Biden and everybody in this US government.
You are complicit. You are part of this.
There's no decoupling yourself from it, and that's
likely why they're trying to act like it's
they're just trying to, you know,
they're bound to it, but act like they're
not necessarily the ones making the decisions. Nonetheless,
you are a copeligerent.
That is the fact.
So I'm deciding right now, since that was
the point, if I wanna end with the
clip.
Oh, here. One more thing I wanna show
you. With either with
the Zionist clip let me know in the
chat. Do you want the
five minute Zionist clip about the reality of
Zionism and and a a Jewish rabbi telling
you how it's infiltrated this government? And do
you want that? Or do you want the
clip of the Green Beret and what he
saw on the Tucker interview,
Palestinians be you know, the child murdered, what
they saw them doing at that Gaza, the
health checkpoint?
Let me know in the chat what you
want. The first one respond.
Patrick Ellington pointing us at this this is
the Colombian president, Gustavo Petro, saying, Gaza is
an experiment
by the mega rich to show the peoples
of the world how they will respond to
a rebellion of humanity.
They plan to bomb us all.
Very important and powerful thing to say from
somebody in a position of power saying, hey,
this was at the Hague Group Summit,
saying people to stand up to this kind
of, you know, destructive effort effort or, you
know, genocide.
They're showing you what they'll do. We will
bomb. We will attack. We will undermine. We
will threaten. We will scapegoat. We will blackmail.
We will do anything.
We will bomb you into the streets. And
I think this is what people are starting
to see, and I think it's not this
is why I think this is
this has imploded. It's working against them now.
Thank god.
Alright. We'll send with this clip, guys, and
I'll leave this for you. Thank you for
tuning in today. I will see you tomorrow.
Thank you for continuing to support this platform.
People like this, whether it's t Lab or
others, need your support, guys. So many people
out there doing amazing work.
There's just, you know,
lean into those that continue to show you
that they care about what they're saying. Can
you just show you that they have principles?
Whatever those may be, for crying out loud,
whether I agree with them or not, at
least people that stick to them, you can
respect that. So find the people out there
that truly embody those things, that have integrity
and don't challenge or ignore it the moment
it's in their interest.
You know you see it too. Thank you
for being here. I love you all. As
always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
We will move the American embassy
to the eternal
capital of the Jewish people, Jerusalem.
No.
No. I was with him until he said
the eternal capital of the Jewish people. President
Trump has the right to make whatever foreign
policy he wants. If he feels that Miami
Beach is best to recognize as the capital
of Israel, that's his business. He can do
it. But once he starts talking about the
Jewish people, now he's encroaching upon religion and
now that's my domain. There is absolutely no
political relationship between the Jewish people and Jerusalem.
It's merely a holy city. The Jewish people
don't have a capital. We never had a
capital. Countries have capitals.
States have capitals.
That's the definition of a capital. Capital,
dictionary,
noun, the most important city or town of
a country or region. Now the Jewish people
are not a country or region. The Jewish
people are a religious community. We pray towards
Jerusalem, but we relate to Jerusalem
only as a holy city,
not as a political
capital city of the Jewish people. And all
of those overtures that we make to Jerusalem
and the yearning that Jews have for Jerusalem
is only as a holy city,
not as a capital city. And because it's
a holy city,
it doesn't matter who has sovereignty over it.
Jerusalem is just as holy and just as
much Jerusalem,
whether it's
under the auspices of the Turks
or the Romans or the British or whoever.
It's important to know that the the Zionists
were the ones that
started this business of the capital of the
Jewish people.
And it's an idea that conflicts directly with
the teachings of Judaism.
At Mount Sinai in the desert,
the Torah says, the Bible says about us,
That's when we became a people.
The Jewish people aren't a people because of
a land. We're not a people because of
a language. We're not a people because of
a culture. We're a religion and when we
were deputized into the religion, when we accepted
the religion
given to us by God, that's when we
became the Jewish people. We had no land,
no territories, we had no capital city. And
in fact, our commentators say the reason why
God gave the Jews the Torah in the
desert
before they went into the Holy Land was
in order to teach them that land,
country
has nothing to do with your Jewishness. Your
Jewishness is because you accept the religion.
Couple years ago, the Pope went to visit
Netanyahu and and Netanyahu was bragging
to the pope, this is where Jesus lived
in this land, and he spoke Hebrew here.
So the pope corrected him. The pope said
no Aramaic.
And he he pope was right. Nathaniel was
so Nathaniel says, yeah. Yeah. But he understood
Hebrew.
Well, you know, maybe he did, but but
Hebrew was was never the national language of
the Jewish people. It was a holy language
just like, land of Israel was a holy
land. Oh, by the way, if if you
see the clip and you don't know which
of the two people talking isn't Tanyon, which
is the pope,
the pope's the one wearing the yarmulke. Even
if we were to pretend that the Jewish
people have a capital,
that would have nothing to do with whether
Jerusalem should be the capital of Israel, because
Israel's not the Jewish people. Israel has nothing
to do with the old Jewish commonwealth. It's
a country that was created in 1948 when
you hear the Israelis or the Zionists talk
about how, Jerusalem has a connection with the
Jewish people for two thousand years, three thousand
years, four thousand years. It's all true.
But
that doesn't translate
to well, therefore, Jerusalem has to be part
of Israel. People think that Israel is some
kind of continuation of a Jewish,
government and but it's not. It it's a
completely different form
of government, completely different values, completely different ideology,
and completely different people. These are not religious
Jews that are running the country. These are
atheists.
And yet, the Israeli prime ministers from Ben
Gurion all the way up to Netanyahu
used the bible as an excuse
for ownership of the land. Ben Gurion, he
says the mandate is not our bible,
but the bible is our mandate.
This is a man that didn't believe the
bible was given by God. He didn't believe
God ever spoke to prophets. He didn't believe
it at all.
Neither does Benjamin Netanyahu. It says in the
Bible, watch the Sabbath to keep it holy.
Netanyahu doesn't refrain from work on the Sabbath.
It says not to eat non kosher food
in the Bible. Does Netanyahu do that? No.
There is nothing holy in the Bible that
Netanyahu cares about.
The only thing he cares about is his
land. Restorationist,
Protestants, we call them evangelical Christians today, they
existed
hundreds of years before any Jewish Zionist was
ever born. And because
the evangelicals,
the restorationists,
had great influence in Britain and Britain had
the mandate, the Zionists
very, very much adopted the Christian evangelical interpretation
of the bible
and that's what they use today. You'll find
that Benjamin Netanyahu sometimes even espouses christian evangelical
interpretations of the bible over the Jewish ones.
A number of years ago Netanyahu spoke in
the society of the Auschwitz Concentration Camp and
he mentioned
a prophecy in the book of Yechezkel
about how the prophets
saw dried bones
rising from the ground and growing flesh and
becoming alive again. And Netanyahu said that that
prophecy is fulfilled with the state of Israel
because the Jews were dried bones, and now
they grew flesh, and they are they are
real people again. This interpretation is not found
anywhere
in any Jewish source
because in Judaism,
this is impossible.
But for over a century,
this has been a Christian evangelical interpretation.
The Zionists, when they talk about the Bible,
they're not talking about
the Judaic
version of Judaism and Jewishness.
They're talking really about the Christian evangelical version.
Netanyahu has no right to claim
that
his state is mine.
I was born in America. My father was
born in Poland. My mother's family is from
England. We have nothing to do with Israel.
We're Jews.
We're observant Jews. We're religious Jews.
I wear a yarmulke.
Netanyahu doesn't.
I keep the Shabbos. Netanyahu doesn't. And Israel
is not my nation state in the slightest.
This is a unilateral
claim of the Israelis, of the Zionists,
and it's an assault on my religion. So
too, the claim that Jerusalem is the capital
of the Jewish people because it transforms the
Jewish people from a religious
identity
to a national identity,
to a political identity.
And it's an assault on my religion when
Netanyahu
says that because
Jerusalem is so connected to the Jewish people,
therefore, it must be part of the state
Of Israel. Jerusalem's holiness, Jerusalem's value to the
Jewish people
has nothing to do with who owns it,
and it certainly
has no reason to be part of the
state Of Israel.