There is another very important phase of warfare.
It has as its target,
not the body,
but the mind of the enemy.
The target, psychological
warfare
is against the enemy's mind.
It is words and ideas. Ammunition used by
the fire alarm.
Its mission is to influence the thoughts of
the enemy soldier. And at the same time
is expected and encouraged to study foreign languages
and the social sciences such as history,
economics, and sociology. For division. He must have
a broad and sympathetic
understanding of all phases of human
experience. Gripping
at my skin.
The walls of night close in.
While the use of this force as an
integral part of combat
has now taken on new form.
These are the SciWar soldiers.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 08/01/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Have a
lot to talk about, a lot to get
to, a lot of many multifaceted topics that
I definitely couldn't fit into one title today.
One thing I wanted to say off the
bat about that is it's interesting. One of
the topics we're gonna get to before I
get into all of it is one that
I felt should have been in the title,
but I've talked about it a lot, and
I wanted to make sure the other parts
got seen in the title today. But American
citizens continuing to be arrested by ICE.
It's not it's not slowing down, it seems.
And I'm very like, I was concerned about
this the moment Trump floated the idea of
American citizens being deported, losing their citizenship, both
naturalized
as well as born here as he said
himself.
But I never really expected I was just
talking about this funny funny enough with somebody
else. You know, that I see these things.
We see the evidence. I recognize all the
facts around it. And yet still there's a
part of me that goes, you know, I
just hope that I'm missing something and I
hope that I'm wrong about that. I don't
want that to be the way it goes.
And then when it ends up happening despite
the research and having the evidence, you're still
in a way almost kind of shocked. And
so it's like as this continues to drive
forward and we keep seeing examples of this,
I just I it's almost almost speechless be
how one, it's happening
that I never thought we'd get to this
point as well as how few,
I guess, let's say just partisan seem to
even be willing to call it out. Regardless
of your position, even people that are team
sport politics, that has to be something that's
beyond the pale. But we're gonna talk about
that today. An important follow-up on a lot
of the immigration points we've talked about is
just to, you know, re kind of reset
the table for that to make sure we
know where we're at, the lies around Garcia,
the lies around Khalil, the lies about the
whole damn thing, people that are not coming
back from Cicat and giving you a horrifying
insight into what that place was, rape, torture.
I mean, it's it's insane. And and you
it's weirdly enough, surprise, surprise, very similar to
what we're seeing in Israel, seeing as how
Boukale himself is a proud Zionist. And we
understand the overlaps to these two countries and
with The United States. Now could just be
coincidence. Maybe they're just the same kind of
people. But the sad reality is that people
who were sent there were innocent.
No criminal record. Many of them were here
legally going through the right channels. The majority,
in fact, in the first group, some of
which have come back, have horrible stories to
tell you. And we're gonna go through quite
a quite a bit today. I wanna actually
start with a point we're gonna get into
around, something I briefly mentioned that I wanna
make sure you didn't miss around a data
breach that Corbett had covered that affects our
website as well. But it it apparently only
emails, but I'll get to that in a
second. And it has already been fixed, but
we're gonna go through it so you guys
know what's going on. I'm gonna be interviewing
Corbett about it pretty soon just to kind
of lay it all out there, and it's
amazing how little attention it's getting.
We're gonna talk about AI censorship on Twitter,
a few points there. And, you know, a
really important focus on, because of some interviews
we recently did and the show we did
on this and Derek's recent article today around
the make,
health tech great again direction.
It's very alarming where this is going, a
medical tyranny, medical surveillance,
and, sadly enough, what we've been talking about.
And it's
one of the documents is entitled winning the
race, America's action plan AI action plan. Course,
is it winning for you? No. No. It's
winning for the power structure that wants to
control the AI to control you and, you
know, other governments as well. And even if
you think that's the direction it has to
go in, the way that this is rolling
out is, it's
not what was promised and is definitely not
what most Americans want. And and, to a
shout to Toby Rogers is where I took
that term from. He's the one that rightly
called this a backdoor vaccine passport system. We'll
go into that. Working with Amazon and Google
and OpenAI and Microsoft, you know, and all
the people that he's called the trusted entities.
I'm not joking.
It's amazing that anybody is still on this
boat other than TeamSport Politics, and I believe
that's kinda where it's at, but I could
be wrong. We're gonna go through that, continuing
to show you where this is going, a
couple updates on Doge, an interesting overlap with
Amy Gleason. How How long have we talked
about that? And here she is showing her
face with this new health direction from Doge,
the acting administrator of Doge, even though it
looks like Dave Smith or not Dave Smith.
What was his name? I'm just I'm jumping
through this stuff right now. But, Steve Davis
seems to be the one
managing daily operations, but she's the one supposedly
still in charge. Same thing when Elon was
there. I think there's something strange there, but,
suddenly, she's in the picture now. And we'll
talk about what that means and the interesting
reality of what DOGE was, which it turns
out now is actually
Americans spent about $21,000,000
to save all that money that actually wasn't
saved.
I think it was about artificial intelligence and
the data of our government or rather us
rather through our government. We'll get to that
as well. Talk about the technocratic overlap to
all of that. A really great article from,
sociable.co
run by Steve Hincliffe or, excuse me, Tim
Hincliffe. And a great discussion around the where
this goes. That's why one of the reasons
I started with that video of,
just the title is Pentagon looks to acquire
generative AI for influence active activities. I mean,
this is deepfakes propaganda
to a whole another level. I believe it's
already happening. I really think it's quite obvious,
actually.
An important discussion on a couple updates on
Russia and Ukraine deploying nuclear submarines,
the continual funding of Ukraine while acting like
it's somehow nobody's fault other than Russia. It's
a it's just an alarm everything seems to
be drifting.
You know,
the the the veils are coming down. Good
way to put it. Right? The illusions are
falling away from people, and it's important to
see.
But from that point, we're gonna talk about
the immigration aspect and how really important this
is as it's coming back to Americans, but
it should matter regardless. And, of course, we're
gonna talk about Epstein, the different updates they're
in, and it's just getting worse and worse.
And,
make sure we talk about Gaza and Israel
and what's happening there.
I know. It's the same thing. I mean,
every one of these stories feels in a
certain way the same kind of feeling, that
it's insane, it's obvious,
it's dark,
and but everyone's starting to see it, and
yet, weirdly, it all keeps going, yet almost
goes faster.
Now you you know my thought on that.
I mean, it seems to me that there's
very clearly something driving all this in a
direction that has nothing to do with American
interests, or maybe not even American leadership
in the sense that they're actually in control
of any of this. But the point is
clearly, it's still going. Almost as if the
more we see it, the faster it goes,
which kinda makes it seem like an endgame.
But we'll talk about all this today. You
guys can hopefully stay tuned to the end.
There's a lot to get to. And,
I don't know. Just keep calling this stuff
out because it's really important that this stuff
gets, you know, not just discussed,
but
something you know, begin to take action in
your life. We were just I the reason
I'm saying this, I'm gonna shout out an
or a show we just did on the
IMA. I'll bring it up next before I
jump too far ahead. But it's just important
that we start thinking beyond the kind of
the daily cycle and doing something doing something
about it in our lives. And I don't
ever mean violence, by the way, but it's
important to find
action or try, you know, ways to act
that out through your life. And as always,
just voting with your dollar, for example, one
of the only votes they really care about,
you know, where you spend your money makes
a big difference how you interact with people's
lives. Before we get to that,
I really wanna make sure you guys didn't
miss this. And as I said, I'm gonna
be interviewing Corbett about it because because he's
the one that showed this to me, which
is really frustrating, by the way.
Because I we both use what's called it's,
GiveWP
is the name of the actual plug in.
And all it really is is kind of
a, an a
medium between your work your website and then
people donating through Stripe. And so it doesn't
appear to be Stripe. It doesn't and or
it even what it appears to be and,
again, I'm gonna I'm I'm I'm read through
his article here, but I wanna talk to
him personally more. We have, you know, twelve
hour time difference, so it's difficult, but I
have him on to break this down in-depth.
That it was more so if they claim,
like, a hack or an accident where, essentially,
there was email addresses that were included in,
like, the the code.
And, apparently, that was it. Even according to
James, it was just email addresses that were
added to spam lists, which is lame, which
is incredibly stupid. And, of course, it feels
personally, it feels focused on whatever we tend
to use to try to generate revenue in
a way that circumvents the power structures as
best we can. And now that's having a
problem. I think James is gonna go away
from entirely. Am I at this point, we're
so overlapped with this and it seems to
have been fixed that my point is that
you I if I would completely understand if
everybody wanted to go a different direction, I
would not begrudge it at all. So I'm
gonna point out in a second all the
different other options we have that you guys
can use. But, again, if you could read
on his work, it appears as of right
now that it is solved,
patched.
But I agree with him. I mean, who
how do we know? But my point is
we don't know whether that's the app, whether
that's, you know, some actual random hack, which
then you couldn't argue with some deliberate action
by them, but we should question everything. And
we should consider whether these are deliberate actions
to, what, suppress corporate media or independent media
and their ways to generate revenue or just
people trying to scan other people, you know.
But so this is what he wrote. He
says he says there has been a data
leak at the corporate report, and that's it
anyone using it. So it's same with us
in regard to email. Well, I shouldn't say
the report that, like, he I don't know
if he means his website or the plugin
going through it, but I guess it's the
same kinda thing. The point is is that
was the vulnerability, not the Corbett report. Right?
Or TLav. It was the plugin through it
that has been fixed. One of the latest
updates of the GiveWP WordPress plugin, he says,
in quotes, accidentally stated started publishing the email
addresses and usernames of some, but not all,
of the people that were using it. And
to the source code, which also wouldn't have
been seen by everybody other than those who
know how to look for it, but those
are the people that would tend to abuse
it, I would argue. The plug in has
been deactivated on on his website, and the
email address are no longer exposed, but the
email addresses were already caught by the spam
bots. The point was they've already done a
patch,
and they argue. And as far as I
can tell, and based on the information you
sent me, it does appear to be passion
solved. So as of now, there's no more
security breach that we can see.
He says they were exposed. Emails were exposed
only those who signed up on the site's
membership from from his site from 2024.
No other members, people who signed up before,
or people who signed up by alternative methods
like Substack or PO Box were affected. So
it seems to be a specific focal point
on
email addresses from certain places. And to me,
that sounds like just a phishing kinda scammy
thing that people tried to use to benefit
themselves.
Regardless, it's just tiresome, isn't it? One day
after another, you know, whether it's even Stripe
before trying to kick us off their platform
before we got some thankful pressure from people
at the head of Substack, not because they
knew me, but because they were also overlap
with Stripe, that pushed back on them trying
to censor us for doing what everyone's doing
through Stripe, which is crowdfunding and, you know,
and donation models and a lot of people
anyway. And they push they pulled back. Thank
god. But end of the day, we know
this is where it's gonna go. They're gonna
come after us at every possible angle, and
not even just us personally, but anybody trying
to, you know, I would argue
profit or benefit or maintain continuity
when doing the right thing for the right
reasons or rather objective nonpartisan coverage or just
unpopular
information.
Either way, I wanted to make sure you
saw that. I didn't want this to fall
by the wayside. It frustrates me that this
even happens, but at the end of the
day, it's something that right now, if, like,
for if I were to pull this away
right now, I that would pretty much collapse
what we're doing. I'm gonna try to make
an effort to pull these things into other
locations and demonstrate and, you know, highlight our
other options more or in general and if
ever, you know, no longer even promoting this.
The problem though is that we have a
huge portion coming through this right now. And
it is let's put it this way. If
it hadn't been patched and solved and there
was no longer vulnerability, I would stop it
immediately. But as it stands now, this is
what most people use to go through this
platform because they've been kicked off everything else.
This is this is what they drive you
to. These difficult choices where we have to
decide,
you know, about oh, dang it. Angela's telling
me the sound is a little spotty.
Is that everyone hearing the same thing?
It's just one more thing. Let me double
check the sound here.
Yeah. Everything looks like it's okay.
Let me know if you guys can hear
okay. Maybe I can try to jump out
and come back in. Either way, long story
short, the point was that
because this is something that's so central to
our current, you know, donation model,
if if we were to stop, then I
would dramatically change what we're doing. And I'd
I'd like to believe that's not what anybody
wants at the moment. But let me know
your thoughts. Let us know. We you know,
what if we can help you transition to
some other thing, which is what I, you
know, ultimately hope that people continue to support
TLAB. Now, what I'm gonna show really quickly
here, I'll just grab this, and I'll I'll
show you this post in a second. We
just did a great IMA panel.
On our website,
you could find at the very top,
the the donation right there. You the donation
link will also give you an option to
send it in through mail, which I recommend
you do over anything else, by the way.
And then the rest of it is through
through Stripe and then and then GiveWP.
There's donate all basically, any kind of cryptocurrency
donation. If you wanna reach out to me,
we we have wallets we can set up.
But on here, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, we have
SubscribeStar.
We have Cash App. And,
on top of that, like, Substack, for example,
you can sign up. You can subscribe to
our,
where was the other ones? Oh, and here's
the Tea Lab store, by the way. This
one's about to close soon, Truth Clothing. But
right now, they're both still active, and this
one's discounted. And then we also have the
online store for, Big Frog, which is where
everything's gonna be in the future. And it's
all the, you know, slight variations, but all
the same things. So all that space you
can donate and support us, you know, as
well as all the other platforms we use.
Like, you could donate through Bitshoot, which is
one I should say out of the gate,
one of the only real free speech platforms
in existence today that really does support TLAB
more than anybody. So if you wanna donate
through there, you still can do that. But,
anyway, all all that said and done, please
help us help me in the chat, guys,
if you can post other links for people
to support.
So now that's out of the way, guys.
And please reach out to me. And my
office number, anything else, if you have any
more thoughts on that. We had a really
great panel,
IMA panel. Carrie Wedler is the one that
that kind of initiated the idea around this,
which was something that was just such a
refreshing change in different conversation. The things that
we've all talked about, though,
fear, propaganda, the idea of being manipulated through
that is something I've talked about a lot
on this channel. Right? The idea of how
emotion circumvents logic, and that's exactly what this
is about. And I've talked about that in
the past around the, the acronym EDSO. It's,
endorphins,
dopamine,
oxytocin, and serotonin. And they all have a
specific kind of, you know one's one's about
love, one's about achievement, one's about you know,
they're all they're all chemical responses that you
get by doing a certain thing, and they
drive you to certain positive outcomes like falling
in love, making friendships, achieving your goals. One
of them that's outside of that pair well,
it's part of the same discussion, but it's
left out of that acronym is cortisol, and
that's about fight or flight. Now that's meant
to be a survival mechanism that, you know,
literally shuts your body down. Everything. Your hair
stops growing. Your immune system stops. It's all
scientifically proven.
But it's meant to be like you're running
for as Carrie points out, like you're running
from a tiger. Now how however, when you're
making deep political decisions about the lesser of
evils and blah blah blah, well, the point
is that it's much less
coherent, and that's the point.
Because the point is we are now kept
in the state of fight or flight because
of our jobs, because of the the twenty
four hour news cycle or a lot of
us anyway. And this was about that discussion
and how Carrie found ways to basically
rewire her brain pathways to get basically heal
herself in a lot of physical ways. She
was dealing with immune system issues and all
and and was could nothing would solve it
over years. And then finally, she found this
new this other path, and everything was solved.
And so this is titled that's just her
story, but there's a lot of good conversation
here. Why and how we must overcome the
fear paradigm to free our hearts and minds.
I really recommend this conversation.
So let's all start in in generally about
a a point of you know, it it
rolls into the AI technocracy discussion, but really
just censorship as this one point goes.
And it's interesting for a couple of reasons.
One, yes, censor Twitter
is actively censoring all sorts of things every
day. Most people don't even talk about it
anymore because it's become sort of a, we
accept it, but we don't wanna highlight it
because we like this. You know, it's this
weird kind of overlap. And those that do
get dismissed. You know, it's happening. Whether it's
about Israel, whether it's about even there's things
that you wouldn't even expect, not to go
too deep on it. This being one of
them, I would argue.
Doctor Simon Godek, why did Gab AI, so
Gab the platform, get suspended? So they made
their own AI, and they put it on
here, which I don't even know how that
works, how you put your AI on there.
But I guess you start an account. I'm
not even sure how that would work. But
it got suspended. Twitter suspended their AI, which
seems a little bit,
you know, dishonest, I guess. I mean, I
guess it is their platform, but it's funny
that you wanna box out, you know, they
what they have a right to do this,
don't they? And so when somebody asked point
blank, you won't be surprised to find out,
at least they claim, that it was about
Israel, antisemitism, the whole damn thing. It says
it was a reply to a post about
ADL's latest hate speech report,
as you might expect. And so that's what
they claim anyway, and they got censored. But
let's not be let's be honest, as always.
This is what's been going on in this
platform for a very long time. There's still
partnerships with ADL. Yacarino made that very clear
before she stepped out of the way.
Now, I mean, Elon's doing whatever he is
now. Now they got everything he wanted from
the AI data scoop.
So who's running Twitter now? I mean, who
is there any it's obviously, I don't think
he ever really was if you really break
it down. You know, he's in charge, but
who's actually doing the work? The point, though,
is that
somebody is still actively choosing to censor for
Israel. That's not a secret. And we can
talk about, and we will, Trump's overlap to
this and how they're censoring right now. They're
pushing colleges to suppress speech about Israel and
calling that national security even though it's a
direct violation of constitutional rights or rather not
honoring inherent god given rights.
Interesting, isn't it?
Now here is what, Garbage Huynh points out.
And he goes, and there it is. Look
at this. The combat antisemitism movement literally had
it listed on the website, banning explicitly bigoted
systems specifically like Gabb AI. Now you can
find responses that you argue some might argue
would be,
what they say, bigoted,
racist.
But there's a May very, very fine line
to talk about this when you can when
somebody wants to say, well, Zionism is not
Judaism. Well, you're an antisemite. Well, no. You're
not. That's a fact, and you could prove
it. So So what's interesting is there is
a line there. People do cross that line
when they're talking about valid things, and sometimes
those opinions, in my opinion, would bleed over
into things. I would argue, yeah. It might
be slightly racist. Maybe not because they mean
to, though, but because they've been manipulated by
the very Zionism that makes you think Jews
are the problem in the world. That's what
they do. The point though is it's about
Zionism, not Judaism, but, yes, that overlaps very
clearly with Jewish supremacism. And this is a
fact that you can look, and I'll show
you as we get through the show, from
even Beth Selim,
the leading Israeli human rights group that openly
tells you that Jewish supremacy in this country
is what is the problem. But it's because
Zionism is creating that just like it's creating
Christian extremism or how you would frame that
from the Christian Zionism perspective.
It's it's all of it. But, see, it's
it's overlapping. But it's Zionism, in my opinion,
at least, is the central problem. The reason
I'm saying all that is because when you
talk about the bigoted systems, when you look
at what they're actually pointing to, well, a
lot of it has to do with,
disagreements about historical facts around, let's say, Theodore
Herzl or the foundation of Zionism or what
Israel's doing right
now. So clearly, there's a line there. Right?
And so this is them trying to, in
my opinion, to stop this because Gad's giving
you answers that they just simply don't agree
with. Now even if you think it is
being racist, so first point decide. Second point,
even if you think it's being racist,
at what point did that become a crime?
Wasn't it the wasn't it the predominantly republicans
who were telling us that the democrats were
doing this and that's free speech and we
can't allow that? And here we are, and
it's the same exact thing,
just finer tuned.
Before it was just, you know, racism and
woke and stokey, but now it's the same
thing, but specifically antisemitism.
Well, guess what, guys? That's what it was
always really about. And not even antisemitism or
actual racism, but about using that to control
your speech, control your thoughts,
and to suppress a genocide at this point.
But so, also, on Twitter, just to see
this is continuing to happen, is every time
we continue to talk about things that I
don't think
well, let's put it as simply as possible
because I don't know exactly what you know,
I can't speak to the intention of this
bot bot censorship program or who was ever
doing it back there. But that
I find it most common under certain topics
that you get these weird little,
you know, buy my crypto or I'm a
investment ad, you know, person that comments underneath
these posts, which then you can almost guarantee
will get dramatically low engagement.
It's because, as they told you, negativity
or people that block you add up just
so then they can sub they can
gain that. Then you can have a team
of people come and block you simultaneously, and
all of a sudden, your post is suppressed.
That's easily what happens. That's the same thing
as before.
So this one was simply, and I'll show
you this later, Bondi out there fighting every
day to make Zionism great again, all while
violating your constitutional rights like it's her job.
Well, the point is that she's literally telling
you that they're pushing
to,
you know, basically speech. We'll come back to
it. I don't wanna jump too far into
it. It's about anti Semitism in colleges and
everywhere else. And this person says, I've seen
incredible results with this random person. Exceptional trading
strategy. It's the same thing every single time.
They almost always block you right afterward. My
point is that they're just continuing to do
this, and every time you see it's suppressed.
There's one right there. Here's another one. Same
point. Same point. Blocked. Interesting take. Definitely makes
you think about privacy. Well, here is trading
information.
And my point here is that, remember, this
was done. This was added. This is CHEQ.
This was done by the platform. Overlap with
Israeli manipulation.
All verifiable stuff.
This is another over overlapping point that I
just wanna include really quickly before we go
past this. Now, this I had this saved.
I had this pulled aside. Somebody commented underneath
this post with something I thought was very
interesting. And I remember there was something that
was like, oh, man. I wanna talk about
that. But f frustratingly enough, I can't remember
what it was right now. But I remember
the feeling when I saw it and I
remember I pulled it aside. Now, it's gone.
I looked, okay. Well, the the the account
is gone. I'm thinking, okay. Maybe that this
worth also thinking about stuff like that. There
are people like us that are out there,
like, sort of gathering information and whether or
not there's a kind of a a choke
point of stopping these things from reaching us
when it matters. Worth pointing out. But also
just another account suspended for simply, you know,
commenting about things that I think, you know,
I felt were interesting, but I can't look
back and find out now.
Oh, and then I wanna include this before
we go. I'm not gonna play the whole
thing, but we're gonna get into the Palantir
Panopticon
health
tech making tech health great again discussion.
Before that, I'm gonna play one quick part
of this. Now Greg Reese had put out
a great video about the agentic state,
AI governance in the agentic state. Now as
it says right here, a person sees themselves
as an agent
for carrying out another person's wishes, in this
case, the government.
And we all know that's happening, where people,
like, envision themselves as, like, the agent of
Trump. Right? There's they all love to think
that way, that we're acting for Trump. We're
all on the same team. That's team four
politics.
Almost without almost as a matter of policy,
it circumvents logic when it comes to their
interest if you go against the team. The
point, though, is this is becoming like a
mental thing.
And and we know this is happening, guys.
We're being warped by a lot of this
stuff. So I wanna play one quick part
of this. Make sure you watch the whole
thing. I think it's a great great video
about where we're going and where we are.
But this guy here,
it's actually a clip from a movie, I
don't think. And I haven't seen the movie,
but I'm 90% sure this guy is an
actor I recognize very young. You'll see what
I mean. But I'm gonna play this part
of the clip so you can see as
he describes what the agentic state is.
Doing the right thing. Was a time, I
suspect,
when men and women could give a fully
human response to any situation,
when we could be fully absorbed in the
world as human beings.
But more often now,
people don't get to see the whole situation,
but only some small part of it. There's
a division of labor, and people carry out
small, narrow, specialized jobs.
And we can't act without some sort of
direction from on high.
I call this the agentic state.
The individual yields to authority
and in doing so becomes alienated from his
own actions. The person
has a choice.
He or she chooses to become agentic.
But once you assume the role,
it's almost impossible to go back.
Published in May
by the Global Government Technology Center in Berlin,
a proxy of the World Economic Forum, the
agentic state white paper outlines
how agentic
AI will revamp 10 functional layers of public
administration.
I hope you The white paper states that
in an era increasingly characterized
by poly crisis,
interconnected and cascading shocks ranging from pandemics and
extreme weather events to cyber physical attacks, financial
instability,
disinformation
campaigns,
and even conventional warfare,
traditional crisis management models are under
strain. Threat actors
are already adapting.
With AI, they can automate, scale, and personalize
attacks at unprecedented
speed.
Governments, by contrast,
are often still operating with institutional
reflexes
shaped for a slower, more linear world. One
of the main proposals is So make sure
you watch this. The interesting part about this,
guys, I mean, look at this. This is
the agentic state. Like, this is a this
is written out from the government international perspective.
There's slightly different viewpoints to what they mean
by that, but the overarching point is what
he's describing here. You know? And what what
the actor there in that movie part was
describing, which is that you are, you know,
like, as you're acquiescing to the interest of
the power structure and as if you, you
know, are, like, a a part of the
apparatus. Right? And and that is I mean,
everything we're seeing and overlapping this with AI,
which is what this is talking about, building
us into this, like, a app like, AI
hive mind kind of apparatus. It's not secret.
They've been talking about this a long time.
So keeping this in mind, let's talk about
where this seems to be going right now.
So I had, I I actually had an
interview with seven seas, which is what this
is. And then, ultimately,
right when we were done, a this is
when that story broke about the make tech
health great again. And it was so perfect
to what we were talking about that I
decided to sort of do a daily wrap
up. So the first hour of this is
me discussing those points, and then I play
the interview on the latter half of the
show, which I really enjoyed. I thought it
came together really well. Let me know what
you think. But it was entitled the Palantir
Panopticon
and Trump's new big tech led private health
tracking system.
Well, that's what he called it. Right there,
this is not what anybody's calling for. We
don't want AI health. We don't want health
medical tyranny, medical surveillance.
We don't want a private health tracking system
with the most trusted tech,
you know, oligarchs. You know, that's what he's
talking about. Google, Microsoft. I mean, where are
the conservatives who were just thirty seconds ago
telling us these people would be in jail
in a Trump? Now they're running the show.
That matters.
So also include this. This is just to
include we talked I I did it in
the first part of the show. Really crazy.
We've been talking about this a long time.
We touch on it in the in the
interview, but I make a point in the
show to go over this and the actual
document. Digital twins. Now he touches on that
in,
Greg Reese in the video.
Right? I've, I've I've I've shimmered with the
I I don't wanna jump back, but there
was a term we used for. It's like
infrastructure or something. The point is that's it's
where we're going, that they're already highlighting that
this is necessary. And I've been telling you
guys this for a long time. Look. Look.
To be clear, it's been going on for
a long time. That's obvious.
I mean, I'm not sure whether I think,
like, the SimCity game part of it was
some sort of, like, a, you know, guide
or even, like, the metaverse that Whitney and
I had a whole discussion about way ahead
of it. Like, we're I don't even think
that's even come to pass yet, but we
were talking about what that would mean when
that world came to pass. I think that's
what it's kind of about. But this is
about, you know, the using your data to
create you in this simulation so they could
predict what you'll do, potentially predict what the
masses will do when this is applied. And
I think they already do that. Not to
say it's always exact, but I do think
we're getting there, and every data point we
add to the machine is helping that outcome.
And so this is what he's talking about
here. Digital twins represent one of the least
practically understandable concepts of digital health and AI.
He says, you can see a sensor or
a wearable, like, you've got to understand the
other parts of it. He says, this new
study doesn't solve that but definitely plays a
role and solves understanding what these things are.
The Human Phenotype Project collected extensive in-depth medical
information and we're 13,000 people. Now you can
see the sources of the data and the
figure, and the point was they're driving this
to, you know, predict where the future will
go. And guess who's doing this? Israel. Happening
in Israel. Not that that always means it's
an evil thing or bad, but at the
end of the day, guys, it seems we're
roads lead back to Zionism at this point.
It's hard not to see that. This is
all where this is going. Zionism, technocracy, globalism,
sort of as one blob coming your way.
Now Trump administration is launching a new private
health tracking system with big techs hell. That's
what we were discussing. That's what you probably
all have seen. If you haven't, we're gonna
go over briefly right now.
All it comes down to is
arguing from the perspective of somehow that because
your data has been kept siloed in private,
that that's hurting you. How dare they stop
you from sharing your data with everybody even
though that's not what anybody wants, it seems.
And arguing it's some kind of a freedom
movement to break free of the privacy coral,
you know, corrals of your information. Jam it
all together for freedom of information for the
government to take from you. And it's it's
a really weird argument. And at the end
of the day, it's about collecting all the
data the same way they just did with
everything they had in the government to give
to Doge and AI and Palantir and everybody
else. And it's about using this to help
solve your health problems or so they claim.
And who knows? Maybe that's what it's at
what it will do. But sorta like Neuralink
and the others, we know that there are
other applications.
Applications such as, as Derek covers in his
article, using that to manipulate you know, for
for example, to box you out of insurance,
to box you out of get things you
need from the government, or to use against
you in all sorts of ways, predictive programming,
medical precrime.
You know? But look, a lot of people
don't even wanna consider these things. Oh, that's
just conspiracy theory, you know, despite the fact
that it's happened many times already. But, you
know, people don't wanna hear it. So the
real problem for me is that this is
invasive, and it is about AI directed medical
surveillance. And I don't know why anybody wants
that. Predominantly, Republicans clearly don't. Now it's being
supported by the teams for politics that wanted
to pretend, you know, that thirty seconds ago
told you Biden was doing this, and now
Trump's doing it. Now they don't
care. Derek put this out, today. Deck big
tech and AI firms are, quote, winning under
Trump's second administration.
It says, first, last week, you well, he
said big tech and artificial intelligence have had
a hell of a week. First, last week,
US president Donald Trump unveiled his winning the
AI race, America's AI action plan, which I'll
show you next, which called for, excuse me,
accelerating the rollout of data centers, which we've
already talked about,
necessary for the expansion of AI, which I'm
not sure everybody wants, but that's too late.
It's happening anyway, and removing
federal regulations on AI. Now wait a minute.
Didn't we just go over this and they
pushed it out of the bill and so
everything's good, and I told you this is
what was gonna happen. But you know why?
Because Lutnick was telling you.
Just like we keep talking about.
It's there.
They'll admit these things, and the problem is
that it doesn't get really discussed until it's
supposed to be seen. The problem is that
was we knew this before because they were
already going here. We'd know, but we saw
it. Then it comes out with a bill
that says no regulation. That is crazy.
They tried to pull it back to five
years, and nobody was having it. And so
now they go, okay. We'll pull it out.
But guess what? It still seems to be
happening because Lutnick already said it on stage.
We're gonna do it anyway. Here we are.
And I'll read it to you directly from
the paper. Now that that doesn't mean it's
legal. Doesn't mean they're allowed to do that.
The pro the point is that they'll do
it anyway because through executive action, through unilateral
power, that's what everything is today.
So no regulation
means that this is the wild west
going forward with all these, you know, dystopian
directions
without any guidelines, no regulation.
So it's people equate you look at it
like this with the new like, at a
time when nuclear weapons were you know, if
you if you believe that's the
thing, people dispute that, which I still I
haven't found that to be
there's information there, but it's interesting. But the
point was,
let's say you said, okay. Remove the regulations.
Everybody can make a nuclear bomb in their
garage, you know, because we wanna get there
before the Russians do. It's the same kind
of logic. Now you may not think so,
but if you understand the what the what
this can lead to, what AI, as even
Elon Musk has told you.
And now we're going remove regulation? Let all
these companies that are literally supporting a genocide
right now just rapidly rush through this with
no indicate no interest in your privacy, no
interest in your security, no interest in your
constitutional rights.
That's where they're going with all this.
He says his plan also called for seeking
direct input from the big tech bros on
which regulation should be voided.
Right? So let's ask the tech rulers what
they don't want
because that's what America first is.
Now there's a one point one quick point
to add to this in a broad sense.
It's interesting how we in that, IMA panel
we discussed, one of the things we talked
about was, you know, not always, you know,
acknowledging the people that are, like, always hair
on fire. Everything's the end of the world.
Right? And trying to at least try to
recognize some of the positive, which is one
at least one way I talk about that
I think that this is only happening because
we are breaking through. We are succeeding in
showing people the information so they can come
to their own conclusions, and that's even though
the propaganda, even though the censorship is still
happening, how is that not a positive? They're
just fighting back and making us feel uncomfortable
to stop it from happening, in my opinion.
The point, though,
is that there's a lot of crazy stuff
happening. There's literally some what's happening in the
world is is insane,
but that doesn't mean that it's all end.
World War three were collapsing today, but it's
important to be honest about it. So it's
important to have the balance. Right? And talking
about things like this that are very clear
what they tell you they're doing, that's not
hyperbolic. That's what's happening. That's what they're telling
you. And, yeah, that's crazy.
Something you know, it is it feels like
it you know,
what's the right word for it? It just
feels too much. But so recognizing it's important
to see that it is happening, but not
that it's like you know, the the the
hyperbolic framing of it. It's all I'm trying
to highlight is that people out there do
that, and they're just trying to manipulate you
based on things that are happening, but trying
to keep you in a state of fight
or flight like we talk about. What we're
trying to do is inform you with things
that can make you understand it,
help us find out ways to fight it
in a measured, balanced way as opposed to
trying to just, you know, I don't know,
call for war and revolution because there's all
you know, the ideas that we're trying to
solve we know as always, you can't solve
a problem without first acknowledging you have one,
and we haven't even really gotten there as
a society yet. And so it's about trying
to solve that and succeed
and bring it back to a place of
stable you know, what Americans want at the
end of the day. When it says these
statements were followed by the announcement of the
Make Health Tech Great Again initiative, which called
for these, Centers for Medicaid and Medicaid Medicare
and Medicaid Services, CMS,
to partner with Amazon, Anthropic,
Apple, Google, OpenAI,
and other information technology firms to begin laying
the foundation for a next generation digital health
ecosystem.
I don't think we want that. The plan
also calls for expediting.
Oh, let me do this part by part,
actually.
Here is
the White House post.
Winning the race, America's AI action plan. I
just wanna show you one part, just that
specifically. It's on page three
about the regulation.
To maintain global leadership in AI. Again, you
know, that's the starting point.
You know, it doesn't the idea that we're
in this forever feud with other countries always
vying for control over each other, that doesn't
have to be the way the world is.
Now, you know, may call me naive if
you
want. It doesn't I don't believe that that's
the reality always that we if we're not
doing that first, they're gonna come kill us.
Well, it's worth considering whether that might even
be the the possibility because of the way
our government has been treating the world for
this entire time. But I'd at least like
to see a world in which we try
to get to a point to where it
doesn't have to be we have to be
globally dominating everything to make sure those guys
aren't in control first.
I think that that this is a cascading,
never ending cycle of war and conflict for
their benefit.
I'm not saying that it's that maybe that's
just the way it is and I can't
see it, but we should at least try.
At least look to a path that doesn't
always guarantee that we're simply trying to rob,
steal, and kill to get there first. Because
if we don't, they will, and that's that
makes it more a little okay. No. It
doesn't. Anyway, the point is to maintain global
leadership in AI, America's private sector must be
unencumbered
by bureaucratic red tape.
Private sector. So not government that you at
least argue are accountable to you, but completely
private entities that have no interest in your
rights, no interest in upholding anything they claim
is about you.
But let's let them have unfettered access, no
regulation to something that could destroy the world.
Because it's better for America?
That's a hard sell. President Trump has already
taken multiple steps toward this goal,
including rescinding Biden's executive order, which we'll look
at,
which, by the way, I mean, I'm not
gonna say that Biden's executive order was meant
to be taken. You know?
They they're all the same thing, guys. They're
the government. That's the point. And I think
one was meant to lead to the other.
But if you read it, it's interesting that
it at least feigns the idea of having
some kind of guide rails or guidelines and
and guard rails. But now he's like, we're
sending that because we can't have any restrictions
to these Palantir genocide commanders. We can't have
that or any of the others. I mean,
it's, you know, Oracle or OpenAI or it
I these are people that are part of
the problem as far as I'm concerned.
I that's just my opinion, but I'm sure
conservatives largely agree when you look at the
past discussions.
And it says on AI that foreshadowed an
onerous regulatory regime
regime. Okay.
You can't have that. Democrat regimes. AI is
far too important to smother in bureaucracy
at this early stage. Isn't that funny that
how, okay, we can't have that because that's
what you want. But in other cases, we'll
smother everything in as much bureaucracy as possible
that we that benefits our direction. That's I'm
speaking as the government, not left or right.
It's the same damn thing with different flavors.
And it says whether at the state or
federal level, the federal government should not allow
AI related federal funding to be directed towards
states with burdensome AI regulations
that waste these funds, but should not should
also not interfere with states' rights. All that's
called lip service. To pass prudent laws that
are not unduly restrictive. Okay. So just like
everything else we're seeing. And we'll get to
the point about Canada and tariffs and, you
know, that's what's gonna help the country, but
they don't like Israel, so too bad. Like,
okay. That's pretty clear. The point here,
we're not gonna make you do it, you
know, states' rights and all, but we're not
gonna give you massive funding that everyone else
is gonna get unless you do what we
think first. That's happening with colleges.
This is coercion, guys. It's just like the
COVID shots. Guess what? Same people.
So realize that this is not you know,
it's about trying to make it seem like
there's choice just like with COVID, but all
you're really doing is using this as a
course of measure to get them to do
what you want. That's what's happening.
But it goes on to list all the
different things led by the Office of Science
Technology Policy, launch a request for information from
businesses, and it just lists off all the
different, you know, recommended policy actions, which is
what they'll do if they want the funding.
You get the point?
Main point, no regulation.
Just like we were talking about, that should
be discussed and it needs to be high
level conversation because that's insane. I mean, this
this this is leading to a dangerous point.
That's my point about before, like, not being
hyperbolic.
We all must acknowledge, not for sure,
but that the possibility exists. If you allow
no regulation on something like this, that even
the leaders in this field will tell you
could lead to catastrophe,
then I don't know. Maybe there'll be a
catastrophe. See, that's not hyperbolic. That's just an
obvious understanding of where they'll tell you it
might go. And let's be honest about that
and not let them rush headlong
into that direction because gotta be China.
So continuing,
the plan also calls for expediting and modernizing
permits to data centers.
The Trump administration has been working to rapidly
expand the creation of data centers around The
US largely in relation to the creation of
AI expansion, which will acquire massive data centers.
Now this goes along with an endless amount
of problems.
Water being a major one, which I'll include
the show we discussed that in. This was
about the overlap of weather manipulation, but the
point simply being on top of it that,
first and foremost, these data centers are consuming
an incredible amount of water. It's I'm not
gonna go into it all again, but just
understand, look at the show if you wanna
understand more. It is not sustainable. We're talking
gallons of water. The reality is one grok
engagement, one open whatever it is, all the
different versions, one question
can will use tons of water. That I
shouldn't say tons. That's that's deceptive, but I
think it was gallons in the context of
one of the studies. They dispute the full
amount, but the point is a lot. Far
more water than you would realize just to
answer your question. That's because of the way
this all works. And this is easily you
could look this up in a lot of
ways. The one I talk about here is
relates to the the Great Lakes and how
what it's doing to the areas and what
it can do. And so the point
is that they're rushing these data centers out.
We talked about Spruce Pine. We talked about
the tech the location in Texas where Elon's
new center is. Every one of these have
the same story. People's water stopped working. The
water comes out brown. They can't get their
utilities to work. They're getting sick every day.
It's not a secret. And yet, this doesn't
matter. Right?
It's hard to see an overlap potentially with
things like East Palestine. Not even to say
I know exactly why that jumps to mind,
but, you know, whether there's something there about
why, you know, people were sick and they
didn't care, whether there's more going on there,
maybe there's something to be built there. I
mean, I'm just hypothet you know, the idea
that there's the the main point is the
government ignoring what they're doing to your life.
That's the real point here. And this is
one more of it for their interest, not
for you.
Oops. Oh, shoot.
That's frustrating. Oh, good. I have the highlighted
part right there. I'll just read that. So
Greg Reese
put out an article or high quote tweets
an article. Texas AI centers guzzle
463,000,000
gallons.
463,000,000
gallons. Now residents are asked to cut back
on showers.
This is not a joke, guys. We just
talked about this one. Musk's SpaceX town in
Texas
warns residents they may lose rights to continue
using their property.
Yeah. Welcome to you've owe nothing and you've
never been happier, at least what they tell
you.
Yeah. Did you think that was just Biden?
Hopefully, you're now seeing it's not that. You
don't realize this is an all of government
direction, and it's going in the same one
right now.
Texas data center uses 50,000,000,000
gallons of water.
Different story as state faces droughts.
We have to understand how this is going
on around the world right now in places
we don't even get to see outside of
the country. It's all consuming.
And it's important you understand that the amount
of water being used
is just not sustainable. Back to the point,
though, we've talked we've covered stories of people
getting sick and what they're doing. Spruce Pines,
an interesting conversation. That was the center of
the of the hurricane,
and everyone made it about the lithium even
though we already proved that the lithium art
contract was already in place, that they didn't
benefit from what happened there. Felt like kind
of a distraction to me because Spruce Pine
was right in the center.
It was right in the center, like the
literal epicenter
of where that was. And so if you
were gonna look at the map and look
at the red spot of where you if
you're arguing it was created, right, wouldn't you
start where the bull's eye was? And that
was directly where Spruce Pine was. And guess
what? It was a quartz mine, basically,
one of the locations in the entire world
that creates a very fine quartz powder that's
needed for, guess what, the AI revolution as
they're framing it.
It literally says, like, if your if your
phones, your computers, everything we use comes from
this location.
And now there's
everyone's building a data center there, and the
town seems to not exist almost. All the
stores are closing. People are losing out because
they're taking over, and they don't want you
there. They can outsource. They can use AI.
They don't want they want you to they
wanna be able to utilize these locations and
basically push people out of these towns. It's
happening all over the country.
So continuing here,
says White House Office of Science and Technology
policy director Michael,
Kras
Krasios
said the plan, quote, charts a decisive
course to cement US dominance in artificial intelligence.
TLAB previously reported that he was one of
the more than a dozen of cabinet members
who have relationships with Peter Thiel and or
Palantir. He was also the attendee of the
twenty twenty five Bilderberg meeting,
which took place last month in Stockholm, Sweden.
He was re referenced in the Twitter files,
so called Twitter files,
as the person who quote, this is interesting,
led the Trump administration's call
for help, excuse me, from big tech as
part of efforts to combat misinformation.
It's the same thing.
Different narrative, same idea. And that was about
antisemitism.
That was about whatever the thing was at
the time. And guess what? Another what we
needed? Silicon Valley to help us. Now it's
a different narrative. Now we need them to
come help us to take over as far
as I can see.
The focus of the meetings was in conspiracies
around five g cell towers, runs on grocery
stores, and misinformation.
Yeah. Five g was one major story we
talked about.
In fact, I'll grab this one for you.
This was one of the this this was
actually the first
video we ever had
that oh, dang it.
It's It's at the end here. I'll put
it in the bottom so you guys can
see it. But this was the first episode
we ever had that went over a million
views on YouTube.
And boom, our account got deleted just like
that. And then a month later, so did
the backup channel with, like, with, you know,
what was it? We had a 100 over
a 100,000 subscribers in the main one. And
the point was and we even got called
we got, you know, PolitiFact, if you will,
where they tried to claim with, there's no
connection. Well, guess what? This this story this
report,
five g bill signed into law while everyone
is distracted by coronavirus during Trump's administration was
not even really about the fact that there
is an overlap.
Whether it's just symptoms, there's a correlation, you
could decide for yourself. But I never made
the argument that it was this. Simply pointing
out and I did show the overlaps is
probably what they got bothered by. But all
it was was while this was going on,
Trump rolled out five g infrastructure.
Very little people cared about that at the
time. Million views deleted.
So when you come back to this and
recognize that at that time, Donald Trump was
working with him to censor you around that
topic, well, what do you know? It all
comes back around.
So we also
have the overlap of this from the
health side of it, which is all interconnected.
Right? But one side of it, we're talking
about AI, but they're using that as the,
you know, the health I seems right now
is the driving factor. But as Toby Rogers
rightly points out, backdoor vaccine passport system, which
I didn't even really think about that way
until he said that. I'm thinking, you know
what? That's exactly right. It's just a more
of a broad view, but it's the same
point. Trump launches digital health tech ecosystem
to, quote, bring health care into the digital
age. And as Derek writes,
many many times in this presentation or the
writings they put out, it initiates the idea
of a digital identity,
that you need that to use this. Well,
what do you know? Suddenly, digital ID is
not a bad thing anymore because the Republicans
are talking about it. Now I know that's
not majority.
That's team sport politics. The point is that
that's what's being framed by the corporate media
as what one side thinks. Speak up, guys.
If you're being misrepresented by the screamers out
there, show the world that you're not blind
to this, whether you're left or right or
aware of the illusion of of of all
of them. But in but think about this.
Now we're going to the point where we're
rolling out. And, you know, really, the the
best way to think of it is that
as before, it wasn't really about vaccine passports.
It was about the idea of the the
whole infrastructure to it. Social credit, digital IDs.
And this was just the way to get
in. Now they're using another thing. And before
that, what was it? Terrorism.
Right. Or now immigration for a moment. It's
the same thing. It's all leading in that
same direction, and we just need to start
being honest about that.
Now this is an interesting overlap to me.
You know I've been bringing up Gleeson for
a while. Here's her LinkedIn page. Not to
say that I necessarily knew one way or
the other about what her intentions were anything,
but that it just was a weird thing
that she was pointed to as the leader
of all this when Elon was clearly in
control.
And then he kinda jumped out of the
way,
and she still is the acting director, but
never really took control. And and so it
was Steve Davis who took over the acting
day to day operations.
So what what is this? Who is she?
And what is going on with all of
this? And she still has it listed down
here as the DOGE service, which is the
which is really the digital services. That's what
it was before they turned it into DOGE
service. So he guess what? Full circle. Now
they're pushing it through the same tech health
discussion for digital ID, and she is the
one leading the charge. So it answers the
question for you. I asked earlier, why is
she from Doge?
What you which you're we're pretending is some
kind of cutting costs and and impact no.
No. She is from digital services they call
Doge now, and now she is presenting,
guess what, the tech health ecosystem that you
need a digital ID to access.
Hey, you guys. It's not secret. This is
obvious. And let me play this for you,
And then I'll you can, I'll look down
here. This is Flexpa,
is ready to kill the clipboard. Today, we're
announcing that we've been selected
by this group,
the network they're discussing, alongside Apple, Google, AI,
OpenAI.
And when I say that again, Aetna, that's
that insurance overlap, elevate, all these different points.
Oracle.
Great. So
a QR code so now you're gonna talk
you know my opinion on QR codes in
general.
Run screaming as far as I'm concerned. It's
very, very, very insecure
for a lot of reasons, and I quite
frankly think it's a manipulation
in entirety, my opinion. But the point
is, select it as the basically, the entire
thing they're doing will without be using these
QR codes instead of, like, like, clipboards writing
things down to exchange informa
smart health
cards.
You know? This is I this is exactly
what we were all screaming about. Where is
all the Republicans?
Andrew Ora is like, yay. Good thing, and
quotes what she says. I'll just play it
for you. Here's Amy Gleason for you.
Information shouldn't be a luxury. It should be
a standard.
So for all the Morgans out there, come
access to information shouldn't be a luxury. It
should be a standard.
Oh, okay. But so it's my information.
You're claiming that it should be a standard
that you will always have access to my
information because that's just the no. It's my
information. I get to decide. Whoever, anywhere else
gets access to it. I do. But, you
see, they're trying to shift this paradigm.
We gotta free the information.
That's this is just crazy.
Access to information shouldn't be a luxury. It
should be a standard.
So for all the Morgans out there, come
join this movement with us at cms.gov.
Movement. Let's kill the clipboard and ask the
facts.
Let's help make health tech great again. Or
in this case, maybe it's for the first
time.
Thank you, president Trump.
Out of nowhere,
As Doge,
my gut, she's the one that's gonna get
thrown under the bus the moment something goes
awry. That's what I think. I think she's
being well, I mean, again, maybe there's more
to it than I did see. When I
first saw Fauci, I completely misread him. So
who knows? Right? But what's interesting is that
this just feels weird.
Out of nowhere. And from DOGE digital services.
But other than that obvious point of why
she's involved, maybe that was the point from
the very beginning.
Maybe the first part was about Elon getting
information from all this and just sailing you
know, riding away into the sunset with all
of your data to create the AI
Conopticon.
And now she's stepping into a role. I
don't know. But the the information
shouldn't be a luxury. It's a I mean,
this is very weird ways to frame your
personal data and them accessing this to make
sure we're all healthy. Isn't this very collectivist?
Isn't this very
communist in a way? I'm trying to use
the words that are gonna make people over
there recognize the problem.
They're literally telling you that we need to
have access to everything to help everybody. It
does not sound very much like you need
to take that to save grandma. It's the
same kind of logic, same broken logic as
far as I'm concerned.
So here is an interesting article,
tech leaders to partner with Trump admin on
patient records.
This is just an interesting part that I
didn't know about Amy Gleason.
Patient health information is now scattered across multiple
disconnected systems leading to inefficiencies,
medical errors, and wasted time and money. But,
you know,
who cares that privacy
no big deal there. We have to be
more efficient.
So the I mean, that's
if you're falling for the argument that you
keeping your information private is hindering everybody's health,
I just think it's like everything else. You
probably already took the shot. So that's alarming
to me, the way that they're framing this,
that your privacy is getting in the way.
It's sort of like your rights getting in
the way. You heard this before.
Remember when what's, what's her name, I'm blanking
her name with the blonde hair, stood in
front of congress and said, you know, we
know what they're doing. We just don't know
how to stop them. And it's like, well,
they know they know where the rules are,
and they act just below them. And we
have to find a way to or, you
know, those rights are hindering our effort. That's
what she argued, that your constitutional rights were
somehow hindering them from going after people that
they wink wink knew meant something else.
I don't care if you even somehow actually
know that. That's still not something that's actionable.
You can't act on people's intent your your
perceived intentions about what they say if what
they say is within their rights. It's insane.
But we've all seen that now. Look at
where it's going from the left and the
right. Same point here.
Then
the interesting part.
Amy Gleason, the acting administrator of Doge and
a former health tech executive, and Arda Cara,
who worked at data firm Palantir before joining
the administration. I just find that an interesting
overlap. The whole thing seems to fall
into place.
This is a clip coming out from this
direction. As Shannon Joy writes, horrifying.
RFK Jr's HHS releases Bazaar, a vision for
the future
video promoting AI assistance and health, QR codes
at doctor offices and AI that help you
manage medications.
QR code we were just talking about. This
is what then there's Amy Gleason telling you
how it's gonna be.
Engine scanning a QR code at your doctor's
office and instantly sharing your medical history
just like when you board a flight.
Oh, and just like people can walk by
and scan those things with very easy devices
or those things can be hacked or you
know, these these are, as always, starting with
an idea that it's you have to allow
that to happen. But at some point, it's
gonna be probably right out of the gate
that if you don't do that, you don't
get this access. If you don't do that,
you don't get a part of the system.
If you don't do that, you go to
the back of the line.
But just realize that these things are not
secure, guys. The way that we're talking about
this, And, really, that's a smaller point for
me at the end of the day. We're
talking I'm talking about the way that this
will be utilized from a whole of government
perspective as Derek was highlighting, and that this
is about centralizing that information. So it's a
one stop shop
as opposed to having your personal records in
certain places that you choose. Now if you
wanted to consolidate those things on your own
accord, that's up to you.
But what we're talking about is the way
it was set up for your privacy, right,
with the interest of you in mind.
Now they're claiming that's a hindrance.
Imagine having an AI assistant that knows your
care plan and helps you manage medications
with confidence.
Picture patients truly at the center of their
care, building stronger relationships with providers
who can focus on healing instead of on
paperwork,
freed from the administrative
burden that technology should have solved years ago.
That's not science fiction.
That's what health care can and should look
like. We're finally at a moment where real
progress is possible. Look like
Now I'm sorry to make a point that
I think people get offended by, but it's
the same point that's made before about the
the the health minister of The UK, for
example.
I think it matters when you put somebody
like a Peter Hotez in front of you
with his crooked brown teeth and his clearly
unhealthy skin and everything about him that screams
I'm unhealthy person
and telling you about your health. Right? Coming
at you, you need to take these to
be healthy and then goes off talking about
it, eats fast. But there's a there's a
100 different things you point out.
I don't think she screams the bod the
the idea of health to me. And every
time they seem to put these people in
front of you that are supposed to represent
health,
they don't appear to be taking health into
mind in their own choices. So why do
we think that makes sense?
Now look. For those out there that wanna
argue, I'm not hating on anybody. You can
choose what you wanna be. You can, you
know, be overweight if you want. That's completely
up to you. It's not good or bad.
It just is except for the reality that
it is unhealthy.
That's a fact. But it's your choice. Right?
It's it's the reality though is that being
overweight is unhealthy
regardless of the ridiculous
effort trying to make that be a, you
know, some kind of a whatever the the
the left side of this tried to make
it. But I do think that's valid as
much as, again, it may insult some people
that this shouldn't be if if we're having
like, here's a good example. RK Junior
is a is a good example of that.
Somebody who clearly seems to be healthy and
clearly cares about health with his track record.
So despite the fact that he's now completely
shifted directions before, he was a good example
of what I think a health person should
look like and should act like and should
represent.
Not that not not the same here, I
think.
We're finally at a moment where real progress
is possible.
CMS,
under administrator Oz's leadership,
understands both the urgency
and the opportunity.
CMS is building the core infrastructure,
a national healthcare directory,
secure data access, and modernized systems.
But the future of healthcare technology can't come
only from the government.
The apps, services, and tools that make this
data useful in people's lives
must come from you. Right. You have to
do it. You have to acquiesce.
And if you don't, you're hurting everybody else.
It's right there beneath it. Private sector.
We're creating the space for new private sector.
And tools that make this data useful in
people's lives
must come from you,
the private sector.
We're creating the space for new ideas to
rise.
So better so we It's an interesting way
to say that. Right? So what do you
so the private sector?
You understand? They're talking about your information. Right?
You. That's very clear throughout all this. They
need your personal data. So if you're calling
in the private sector, like, the I mean,
so at what point is there I mean,
it's the same as Palantir, I guess. They
they just got access to literally everything the
government's ever had on you, and we and
I guess we're just moving forward. Like, that's
not a big deal. So I guess I
was kinda balking at the idea that there
should be a middle step there, but I
guess it I guess they've already shown you
that they don't care about those things.
Compete,
scale, and help real people like Morgan.
Step into this space with us.
This isn't just a showcase. It's a national
sign of acceleration.
It's about action.
We're asking real companies to make real commitments,
to build data sharing networks,
to create apps that deliver real health outcomes,
to help us kill the clipboard and give
people a health care system that's smart and
secure.
How about we just lean into healthy choices?
How about that? How about we lean into
eating healthy and and exercising and, you know,
getting out in the sun every day? No.
We just take an app. Go sit in
a dark corner, stay on your computer, and
just jam pills down your throat. That's what
they want you to believe is health,
which embodied by what's what's who is talking
to you. You know? I mean, it that
that's kind of the idea, the representation. Right?
You don't need to exercise. You don't need
to actually be healthy. Here's a shortcut for
you. You know? And it's not what they're
really talking about. They're talking about using AI
data to help predict and help, but that's
the larger picture. Everything they're doing is about
you know? I mean, I it's like the
joke of the movie Wall E. It's like
where it seems to be driving is these
you know? You just everything's taken you can
sit in your chair or just wear VR
goggles on and just be fed by a
tube. I mean, that's what it seems like
the world's driving towards if we keep going
in this direction.
Let's stop waiting, and let's definitely
stop faxing. Let's start building. What does that
even mean? Stop faxing.
I thought about that earlier. I'm like, are
we talking about fax machines? Is that even
still a thing in doctor's offices? That seems
kinda crazy.
The right data at the right time can
mean the difference between loss
and hope.
The time is now.
Are you in?
Yeah. Purdue I just got a weird feeling.
Virgil, I'm sorry. Just it feels weird. Like,
it feel I I still have a weird
sense about where what where how is she
just being inserted into all this? Seems like
a strange choice. And I I really do
think it comes back to the fact that
it's really about digital ID.
She's digital services, guys. That's what it's about.
So if you don't understand that, you think
she's the acting director of Doge, then why
does it make sense that she's a part
of this? Is Doge about health?
No. Why is she the one doing that?
Doesn't that seem interesting? It's about digital
overlap, and she she's like the primary presentation.
It seemed very strange to me. Now talking
about Doge,
it's important to understand that this is apparently
just drifting to the background,
and it's getting some coverage about what didn't
happen. But it just it's amazing that we
saw
a very large head fake, and it just
seems to be going away.
This is from, I believe, was today or
yesterday,
thirty first yesterday. Doge has wasted billions
paying people
not to work. Report fines. Democrats did the
math. Of course, you question it all. Right?
But you can look at the information for
yourself. Doge's war on waste
is costing Americans $21,700,000,000,
they concluded.
Right? So if all these claims about savings
and that was I personally showed you that
that was not true.
There are some things that were being cut
back, but they were deliberately, and I mean
knowingly,
misrepresenting what they were showing you, which has
to show you there was something else going
on. At the very least, that they were
not succeeding and lying to you about it,
but I think it was never about what
they were talking about. They were presenting you
a false presentation
to go bad democrat
as we justify stealing all of your data.
The point, though, is that this is a
failure
in every possible metric
by what they told you would happen. Even
his own claims of savings didn't even come
close.
This is raw story. Doge lied. Expert floored
as blistering report finds Musk team blew billions.
Same discussion. I mean, it's just it's
was I don't think we're ever really about
what they presented to you. And that needs
to really reflect on everything else we're looking
at. If something as large as this, a
central fixture of what they claim they're gonna
do. Now we have bigger government, more spending,
all the wars are continuing, but
everything's winning, apparently, if you listen to the
liars.
This is part of the manipulation, part of
where this is going. I just need I
think we need to get catch up with
what's actually happening instead of, you know, getting
pulled into the day to day. So this
is important.
Because I think this is what it's really
about.
Which, I mean, let's be clear. That's not
even I think. That they're doing it. They're
telling you that. They're making it clear. AI
government, they made it clear in a lot
of different ways as they're already using AI
bots for the,
what was it?
Blanking on the one or more different locations
already. I forget the main one. If it's
one of the larger,
have I'm sorry. I'm blanking on that. But
they're already talking about it. There's listing,
different articles already of them using certain AI
bots in different government locations.
My real question was whether or not this
was the entire thing. The Doge, not just
stealing your data to make this happen, but
was already implementing something like that. But Trump
and the rest are making it clear.
Efficiency,
artificial intelligence.
Now this is an interesting overlap. Remember the
whole learn to code thing? I just love
when these partisan things become very clear to
not be partisan at all. Remember when they
really push in the idea, oh, you heal
you know, people in the middle of the
country, in the middle of the woods or,
you know, rednecks don't know anything, however they
framed them. Right? You could just learn to
code. Come back and learn how to, you
know, become better. And then it got turned
on them when all of a sudden a
bunch of mainstream media people got fired and
they were like, hey. Learn to code. And
then they censored you for it. It's just
crazy.
What's interesting is here's the Donald Trump administration
doing the same thing. But now it's okay
because we're in it, and it's not it's
different because Trump, but it's not, though. They're
now telling you see, what you have to
understand, from my perspective at least, is what
they were pushing on you then
was driving you to the point the understanding
that this is where the world's going. Right?
We're gonna be an AI system or an
AI society, so learn to code. That's the
way you're gonna be relevant. And, of course,
then it became, you know, pushed back because
it was a stupid thing to say. Like,
you know, it was I I don't wanna
get to the whole thing, but you remember
it. The the reason it was happening was
such a stupid story.
So now,
this is doc director Michael,
Crato Cr, I think his name is weird.
Crat Cratso Cratios, excuse me, who Derek was
just referencing, the person who was involved with
censoring around misinformation and working with at the
Bilderberg meeting, you know, he's he's a central
fixture here. POTUS is committed to making sure
we can upskill and retrain retrain Americans for
the very important high paying jobs that will
support the infrastructure
build out powering the AI. Boom.
Great. So learn to code. That's, I mean,
it's a, it's a joke, but it's the
same point though. Isn't it? And I simply
said, so in other words, learn to code.
Funny how these partisan narratives always swing both
ways. Two party illusion, guys. Here he says
it himself.
Saying that that I have come to appreciate
over the last six months working on this
is the intense amount of new labor that
we need to be able to build the
infrastructure necessary to power the AI economy. A
big chunk of the
action plan talks about how the Department of
Labor,
NSF,
Department of Education, many others are gonna be
working together to reskill, retrain,
and prepare more Americans to be able to
support the infrastructure build out necessary for for
the AI boom. To the present Is that
what we want, though?
You know, this so this is this is
government
and think tanks planning
what your life will be is to benefit
the government direction. Now even if you wanna
pretend at the top that's them thinking that's
what you want, whatever,
it's not like you're choosing they're they're they're
rolling forward a plan that requires your change.
It's not how we're told this is supposed
to work. Whether it's AI, whether it's foreign
policy, whether it's censorship around anti Semitism, the
reality is they're not caring what you want.
They'll sure as hell scream America first and
then do what they want for Israel, then
do what they want for themselves.
Is,
is committed to making sure that we we
can retrain and prepare Americans for these very
important high paying jobs who will support the
infrastructure build out. Mhmm. I think the fur
That will support what we want to build.
So learn to code, guys.
Let's not forget, by the way, that the
people we're talking about, the CTO from Palantir,
the CTO from OpenAI and Meta,
are lieutenant colonels in the military. We talked
about this with Brad Miller,
person who resigned from the commander position of
the hundred and first airborne because he didn't
wanna be forced to take the shot. Good
for him. He he he made it very
clear.
There's not some kind of special category. Whether
or not but, you know, they they didn't
go through boot camp. They didn't go through
any training. They just got inserted into
the military at, like, the second highest position.
And now he said that they're no different.
It's not like they're a special tech version.
They are a lieutenant colonel, and everybody's under
them except for the colonels. And so at
the end of the day, they are now
part of this power structure. They always have
been in their own way, but now we
are literally watching, as I said, technocracy in
uniform.
Terrifying to me. I don't know why this
didn't get more attention. I mean, I I
think I do. Obviously, this is a very
important shift.
But Palantir is interesting seeing as how it's
not being mentioned in this overlap. I think
it's because it's got far too much heat
and clear I think I mean, the point
I made the other day is because Palantir
is just completely immersed in the government at
this point. It it just is. It's like
every aspect of the surveillance. It has become
the government.
So that is why it's invested or involved
with everything else. Right? So whether or not
they're involved with the tech health discussion or
not, there's still gonna be a piece of
that which will be involved in what that
is. You can't decouple this at this point
from everything they're using. I don't wanna go
through every single one, but we've done many
shows on this. From the different aspects of
Palantir being inserted into the government processes, our
foreign policy, the surveillance, immigration, everything.
As Jason Baster points out, Palantir just locked
in, and this is a new one, a
$10,000,000,000
army contract, one of the biggest in DOD
history. Gee, I wonder if maybe them being
in the army had anything to do with
that. Its software runs through 30 plus federal
agencies. Think about that, guys. 30 plus federal
agencies. Point I was just making.
Its market cap now tops Bank of America,
Coca Cola. The techno military complex isn't emerging,
guys. It's already here.
$10,000,000,000
contract from the army.
Jason Baster also points out, Palantir's ex intel
head, Gregory Barbascia,
is now managing a $70,000,000,000
$70,000,000,000
plus IT budget,
the digital keys to nearly every government system.
When the guy who built the tools to
watch us runs the system that controls us,
privacy isn't just a risk. It's already gone.
Now this is the same kind of thing
I would say from before.
You may find this to be fear of
it. How could this be fearmongering if what
he's doing is pointing to absolute facts?
Right? That's happening. He's there. He's connected to
Palantir. He does have those access to these
things, and he did build this. So his
the only part of the opinion
is that privacy is not just a risk.
It's already gone. And you can dispute that.
But if you have to understand, the reality
is this has become the shift. Like, they
are now in control of this. They've removed
the silos of information. They do already have
access to everything that was on private, so
it's gone, guys,
At least in that context. So just recognize
the people that wanna make it about fear
mongering
usually are the ones out there with their
hair on fire talking World War three every
day. The reality is this is important to
see, and it is serious. But let's not
lose ourself to it. We can stop this.
I believe that.
Next one. And this is an important one
as well. I'll make sure I didn't mix
these up. Oh, here it is. I'll I'll
come to that next. This is an important,
article from Tim,
from, Tim Hencliffe's platform,
which is sociable.co.
Generative AI. This is an interesting one.
Oh, wait.
Oh, sorry. I did mix them up. So
here, let me come to this in a
second.
I wanna make sure you saw his account
because it the the article is is authored
by somebody else.
Oh, it's right here. But just important to
see that. We'll come back this one second.
So I guess I will do this first.
So here is a clip that I think
is interesting. This is, oh, this does include
both of them actually. Alex Jones talking about
the idea that Palantir is a small thing.
It's just a small little side thing everyone's
over focusing on. Right? And the the Democrats
are all upset about it because it's spy
you know, it's meant to look at the
government. All of that's lies,
including the thing he says about real ID,
also incorrect. But it's important to hear that
him and plenty of others are very clearly
trying to
stop you from seeing what this is. Ask
yourself why. And, mad crab simply says, this
is getting pathetic. You don't get to say
Palantir's role in the US government is tiny
or small or other AI companies when they
are literally getting government contracts embedded in nearly
every single federal institution or the fact that
they're clearly gigantic?
What Grok's doing, is I mean, Elon with
Grok is really good.
Grok is interesting. I'm more concerned about this
suite of companies, though, like Palantir,
which which is they're feeding all of the
data over to Palantir so they can manipulate
it with algorithms,
and they're everywhere. They're looking at the wastewater
during the COVID pandemic. But you're back to
this. I've looked at the scale of Palantir,
and it's tiny compared
to DeepSeek and all these others and and
and and CHAT GPT. And I'm not, like,
defending
Peter Thiel. I'm just saying it's like I
get it from the Liberals and the,
you know, Israel
obsessed, whatever you wanna call it. So we
just Palantir. Palantir. Palantir. Palantir. Asking me about
Palantir. Palantir.
And
when you look at it and Really quickly,
guys. This is just funny to me. I
get it from the liberals and the,
you know, Israel. Oh, you mean Republicans? Yeah.
Republicans. Conservatives. Your entire base. That's what he
means. Israel obsessed. That's like the majority of
people on this. It's just funny to me
the way he frames that. But also the
idea that what he's talking about is so
everybody,
left and right, they see it. They keep
calling it out. Maybe because it's the truth.
Like like everyone everyone can see, but it's
a small thing. Don't mind it. Obsessed, whatever
you wanna call it.
So the way just Palantir Palantir Palantir Palantir.
Asking me about Palantir Palantir.
And
when you look at it and you understand
it,
Palantir
and the surveillance systems and the AI and
all of it has been an outlier
from the bigger companies.
Now, look, you could make an argument that
at one point, it was the, like, smaller
element in it, but in no case has
it ever ever been small. They tried to
frame themselves as sort of like the small
up and coming groups. Remember when they tried
to collect themselves for the new contracts?
And they were leading that. And they were
not the small ones. They, as he pointed
out, have gotten almost every contract. Regardless,
as he's saying this, you can prove that
they were gigantic. Now, as I'll show you
next, they're one of the largest and most
valuable companies in existence.
You don't think that I mean, you have
to understand. He knows this. He can see
that. This is self evident. And his argument
is that it's small and it's not important
or there at least that these are bigger.
Well, okay. If you wanna argue they're bigger,
then break that down in the context of
what you mean by you mean money. Are
they more invested there? Have they been around
longer? The reality is if you look at
what Palantir is doing, there is nothing in
my opinion that even compares even comes close
to what they're currently doing. The scope of
it is insane.
But if you listen to him, it's small.
It doesn't matter. It's a democrat lie. Sorta
sounds familiar, doesn't it? And it's been wanting
to get big contracts,
and Trump wants to use it to track
illegal aliens and stuff and the real ID
that they're trying to bring in that that's
terrible
that never got implemented because it's it's unconstitutional.
So I've been Incorrect. Critical of all of
that. And I obviously don't trust Palantir and
the rest of the stuff it's doing.
But it is small
compared to all the other big AI and
the Pentagon Sentinel and all the rest of
it. The reason you're seeing the attacks on
it everywhere
is because it's trying to get contracts
that other big tech companies already have.
Okay. So now that they have them, Alex,
now why? Why now is it still being
caught? Okay. Because they just want them back?
It's not if you are if you think
for one second, this is all what what
are you arguing that Google and everybody's, like,
creating a
everybody individually
can recognize the problem here, and people are
calling it out from left and right as
you just highlighted.
How do you not recognize that shows you
something that is self evident That everyone can
see what's building out from left to right
platforms, mainstream alternative media, mainstream media in genuine
independently.
It's just wild to me that even you
can even this is the same thing as
people coming out and acting, you know, Trump
and telling you the Epstein files are a
hoax. But it really does confound me. How
why would you we destroy your credibility
for something like that? That's why I I
don't know. I can't answer that. But I
do it makes me consider that there's something
else driving these intentions, driving these actions. And
because
Palantir has been supportive of Trump. And so,
yeah, Trump is going to them
because they've been supporters. Well, no. Alex Karp
endorsed democrats, teal republicans. Right? Because they're not
about partisanship. It's about control. But let's ignore
all that. But all this hype about Palantir,
it it all of these systems can be
used for control. Well, that's obviously clear. So
why would we not care about this one?
All these systems are out of control.
All the AIs are woke.
Okay.
Okay. So then, yes, we should all care
about it then. Right? No. Forget about Palantir,
though.
Is so so Palantir is being used
to run AI drones, killing people in Gaza.
And Ukraine.
All of it's very concerning.
But you don't really care about it as
you can clearly tell. But why do people
know about Palantir and nothing else? Well, that's
because it comes from the left
only focusing on Palantir.
No. No. Not even remotely. And you just
said in two different interviews that everyone on
the right and left. But let's just pretend
like it's just the left now because that's
the easiest scapegoat. Bad democrat. Ignore it.
Because it's seen as something being brought in
to surveil the government itself and it Oh,
is that the case? Oh, okay. So not
you. No. No. No. Not not all of
your personal data exclusively. No. The government. We're
gonna spy on the government.
That's just not even I mean, guys, it's
just mind blowing to me that people can
get away with this kind of BS.
So here's the point. As Jason rightly points
out, this is from twenty eighth. Palantir is
now worth more than the Home Depot, Procter
and Gamble, Amer Bank of America, Coca Cola,
$375,000,000,000
market cap, 3,100,000,000.0
in annual revenue. Palantir's secret, a 45% spike
in a US government surveillance contracts in just
a quarter. You know, right in a little
period where he was going, don't look at
it. It's not happening. It's only the left.
Boom. It all explodes. What a coincidence.
Surveillance in America is the is America's new
frontier.
Palantir joins a list of 20 most valuable
US companies with stock more valuable than more
than doubling in 2025.
Top 20, but it's tiny, though. It's a
democrat thing. Well, let's talk about the way
it's being used in the larger direction from
this.
Great article here. Pentagon looks to acquire generative
AI for influence activities.
It says the Pentagon is looking to acquire
generative AI
for its and this is one of the
reasons I started with that clip,
for its influence activities, propaganda.
As it faces increasing scrutiny about affecting US
citizens
and acquiring
publicly available information according to the Rand Corporation.
Meaning that as it always has, the propaganda
spins back and affects you just as much
as anybody else. If not, it's already aimed
at you, which is what I think. But
the point though is not just that, but
also that it is
using your personal data, which we were just
talking about. That's Palantir. That's everything we're discussing.
And we're gonna come back to the point
they made the other day. Commercial data. That's
what they're talking about here. Isn't that what
they just got?
Yes. And it's important. Not just for this
kind of discussion, but also for foreign policy
for for bioweapon discussions. I'll play that before.
I'll do it in a second. That and
that's from the was the Aspen Institute? I'll
play in a second. Commissioned by the regular
warfare technical support directorate,
the RAND reports
the RAND report, quote, acquiring generative artificial intelligence
to improve US department defense influence activities.
That used to be thing they things they
acted like weren't happening, by the way. Remember,
the Smithmont Modernization Act was making it illegal
to propaganda as Americans,
or rather opening the door to doing so
if national security was, you know, the excuse
before it was illegal in general. The point
is it's always been happening. And what they're
saying
is or or they argue that it's something
that was never really aimed at you, but
my point is always has been. So now
they're just stating it. That's like that video.
They're just coming right out and telling you,
we lie and manipulate everybody. For your freedom,
though, is kind of the underlying point, which
is not even true. And takes a look
at what if in my opinion. Takes a
look at what it would take for the
Pentagon to acquire generative AI for influence activities
at scale, along with possible implications of its
use. And influence activity is, quote, a deliberate
attempt to affect a person or group's thoughts,
feelings, or behavior.
And the and this goes well beyond just
that kind of propaganda. Remember, we're at the
age of, you know, AI, algorithmic control, neuro
weapon, neuroscience,
the point of where we're talking about
manipulating your feelings and behavior internally.
Right? Actually manipulating your movement. These are real
things in the conversation.
But it goes on to say The US
Department Of Defense sees great opportunities in leveraging
the power of generative AI, not only for
creating deep fakes and propaganda campaigns for its
own influence activities, but also for gaining unique
insights into the targeted audiences for planning purposes.
Now let's just say historically you could look
at the government's track record and be like,
well, they've mostly fought for freedom. Right? They've
mostly saved and helped people. Then maybe you
could go, okay. Then maybe it's important for
them to be able to influence ideas. But
seeing as how you can very easily prove
they've got a track record of bloody nations
and
despotic regimes and and torture and, you know,
everything else.
And are currently right now from both sides
of the paradigm supporting the worst genocide we've
ever lived through, seen, and witnessed on live
streaming.
Maybe it matters that they're using tools to
manipulate what people think. So do you think
they're gonna manipulate you just to care about
genocide? Or maybe right now manipulate you into
thinking that's not what's happening. Right? See, they
want a frame that says for your interest,
for the benefit of America, but reality is
it's for the benefit of their control over
everybody else. They're not good people at this
point. You can obviously see that. They are,
at the very least, immoral, amoral. Like, it's
not even playing a factor in a decision
making process, but you can see what they're
doing. Now that doesn't mean every single person
in every single position, but as an entity,
guys, you can't deny what they're involved in.
Some of the worst things I've ever had
to look at in my life.
So deep fakes and manipulation propaganda
is a dangerous tool for anybody, especially in
hands like those. Generative AI can be used
to create videos that purport to show well
known public figures
or members of a particular racial or ethnic
group making statements that support or refute particular
political viewpoints or committing particular acts,
like deep fakes to drive people's actions, which,
you know, there's a movie about this. There's,
there there's a oh, it was that that
what was it called?
What's that called? Something like mountain head. I
think something like that. It was a moot
a recent one on Netflix. And the whole
premise is of the of, like, a bunch
of these tech people,
like, four of I think four of them
who always meet at this one location in
the in the in the the, like, the
Alps or something in the snow. And this
time, while they're meeting, one of the guys
had released an app. It's kinda like an
Elon Musk character and all of it that
was allowing them to create deep fakes, and
it was just destroying the world. Countries were
at war because of videos they thought were
real, and it was like this whole and
they're just, like, enjoying their weekend. Now it
gets it it gets pretty crazy. The point,
though, is that they're already kind of predictive
programming like this. We all know where this
is gonna go.
Right now, the technology exists. I still say
this before. I don't know. I'm wondering when
that shoe is gonna drop.
Some major example. I've already seen some that
are close. But like I said before, like
a video that purport like, what if we
get one around Epstein Trump? All of a
sudden bombshell video comes out and then he
says, that's not real. They say, no, it
is. And you don't know. Of course, Trump
would say it's fake if it is real
because he wants to cover it. But of
course, if it's fake, he's gonna say it's
fake. And so the problem is you have
to use tech to find out and everyone
will dispute it and take it for what
they will. If that becomes a massive cascading
problem, you can see where that goes, and
they're leaning into this.
The advent the advent of generative AI presents
significant opportunities for enhancing DOD's influence activities by
improving the quality, agility, speed, and scale of
operations.
It says one thing the authors note is
that as the digital environment spreads across national
borders, it is getting more difficult
not to affect
US persons
that get caught up in the dragnet of
US military psychological operations. My opinion, they do
not care even in the slightest.
In fact, they're aiming it at you. But
if you don't think that, the point is
that even if they don't want that, now
you're getting wrapped up in this because they
can't pull you. It's, the best word, I
guess, would be that it's all kind of,
you know, overlapped
because the net the,
like, for for example, we're trying to propaganda
for propaganda as a foreign country. And then
because we're all using the same social media
platforms, that kinda spreads into your view and
affects what you think. And that that's a
small example, but the point is that that's
happening.
And they're feigning to care about how their
manipulative,
dishonest campaigns might affect Americans. But, again, I
think they're being aimed at you. But it
says DOD's influence activities have faced increasing scrutiny
as it becomes increasingly challenging to avoid affecting
US persons in the hyper connected information age.
It says generative AI can help the military
better understand the audiences they are looking to
manipulate.
I just love this. It's just funny. It's
the the one point, like I said, they
never would have even admitted that this is
what they were trying to accomplish. One of
the recommendations made
that the Pentagon should, quote, obtain publicly available
information,
p a I,
and fuse it with all source intelligence
to make sense of the operational environment. Okay.
So now we have another element of what
might have been the reality of Doge.
Not just training their algorithm their models and
their AI and algorithm,
but potentially more than that. Potentially, training other
elements of AI in regard to psychological operations
and deepfakes.
You see, there's something much bigger happening around
all of this. And so what they're talking
about is this publicly available information, which right
now, in a lot of ways, can just
be scooped up. But a lot of it,
and what, many articles have argued is what
they call the gold standard of information is
the secret private stuff. Stuff that you because
you can go online and you can state
something that's completely false, but that still gets
absorbed by the AI and still kind of
slants one way or the other. But the
stuff that they can you know, your your
medical
actions,
what you did, what you stated, and what
actually happened.
Right? The the these are the things that
can train these things beyond way more what
they can get in the public eye. And
so when they have access to that, you
know, sort of like removing the siloed information
and giving access to all these tech companies
to scoop it all up, this is a
part of it too. It says in doing
so, generative AI can enhance the capability
to identify and acquire relevant PAI.
Several industry partners offer, quote, narrative intelligence products
that use generative AI processes to perform or
supplement PAI analysis.
On this front, the intelligence community is already
setting up a portal
for the government to purchase PAI through the
intelligence community. So I guess what they kind
of scoop up and analyze and present to
people who wanna purchase it.
As the the intelligence community data consortium,
previously known as the IC data coop,
sounds folksy,
which seeks solutions, quote, to manage a commercial
data consortium that unifies commercial data acquisition.
Well, that sounds fantastic.
Well, here's a video that I think is
very relevant. And I we this just came
up in my interview with seven seas, which
again went out as a daily wrap up,
but it's second part of the show, wherein
I go over Trump's new private health tracking
system. And we discuss
where all this is going.
This clip here from twenty third twenty three
discussing
commercial data.
Palantir
and used to make ethnic bioweapons.
Listen for yourself.
To be clear, I think one of the
things we're talking about here is that there
are
Oops. Wrong one. Shoot. Hold on.
I just removed the wrong video.
Where were we?
There we are.
To be clear, I think one of the
things we're talking about here is that there
are now weapons under development and developed that
are designed to target specific people.
That that's what this is,
where you you can actually take someone's DNA,
take, you know, their their medical profile, and
you can target a biological weapon that will
that will kill that person or take them
off the battlefield or make them inoperable. So
for the podcast, this Aspen Security Forum. This
is not some fringe thing. This is US
government. There's a person I think it's a
general sitting right next to him. So you
can't have a discussion about this without talking
about
privacy,
and commercial data and the protection of commercial
data because
expectations of privacy have degraded over the last
twenty years. You know, young folks actually have
very little expectation of privacy. That's what the
polling and the the data show,
and and people will very rapidly spit into
a cup and send it into 23 and
Me and get really interesting data about their
background.
Well, I would argue that it's not necessarily
all of them willing to do that, but
most of us that just recognize that that's
where we are. But always the reason why
we shouldn't just go, well, they've got everything,
so why? Who cares? Don't do that. Right?
That's what they expect.
Every little bit you can see you know,
do your best to keep yourself insulated regardless.
But the point is that he says most
everybody is, you know, less caring about it.
Well, I argue it's just that they're unfortunately
forced to exist in it, and they just
acknowledge that's where we are. Right?
But both matter. And guess what? Their DNA
is now owned by a private company and
can be sold off very little expectation of
privacy. That's what the polling and the the
data show.
And people will very rapidly spit into a
cup and send it into 23 and me
and get really interesting data about their background,
and guess what? Their DNA is now owned
by a private company and can be sold
off without very with very little,
intellectual property protection or or privacy protection. And
we don't have legal and regulatory regimes to
deal with that.
So, we have to have a an open
and public discussion, and this is gonna have
to be a political discussion. Okay. So here's
the one of the main points. That's what
they're forcing through. Donald Trump and his team,
really just the US government, are ramming this
through before those protections are in place at
a point when we do not have that.
So now this is the wild west where
people can access whatever they want for the
benefit of this rapid AI growth and whatever
else we're talking about. All the different offshoots
of where this goes. Does that sound like
what's in your interest or what's in the
interest of a controlling power structure?
Come on, guys. We have to be honest
about this.
About what does
the protection of health care information, DNA information,
and your data look like because that, data
is actually gonna be procured
and collected by our adversaries for the development
of these systems.
You know, or by your government. Right? That's
the real point. You can always frame it
as the evil other side
like we doubt do with Democrat, Republican, but
it's it's also your government. Yes. I wouldn't
disagree with that. Israel is very clearly doing
that. China, I can almost guarantee. The point
is that it's also happening here
to you from your government. And that's obvious.
That's not in a hypothetical. You can see
it. And he just explained to you exactly
that point about commercial data.
And that's exactly what they just talked about
in the article. Right? That this is where
it's going. And now this is this part
of it is about,
the psy ops and you in getting access
to all of that to be able to
manipulate and learn how to change your mind.
It's just it's everywhere, guys. Everywhere you look
right now.
And let's not forget what this is really
about. This was all the way back in
01/02/2025.
And in reality, this has been going on
a lot longer than that, but just fifth
generation warfare. We're well beyond the ideas of
the past, the way that warfare is conducted,
the way that propaganda is conducted. As I
just I've just entitled it drones, fog, false
flags, and political destabilization.
Remember all these different events, the Cybertruck blowing
up and all these different things that, you
know, rapid succession of things that ended up
being nothing. Or at the very least, that
weren't ever what they claimed or the different
like, whatever happened with the Michigan shooter? Or
it's just there's so many different things. Was
it Michigan or the guy with the weird
mask that tied back to the Israeli security
contractor?
Is is it or that was in Israel?
There's so much going on that it's just
meant to just drown out everything else. But
it's also about what fifth generation warfare really
is, which is why we started with that
clip.
It's about trying to manipulate you into your
into whatever they think they need at the
moment
or getting you to position where you're amenable
to whatever they say whenever they need you
to be somewhere.
Like, it's just it's so constant right now.
Now
let's talk about a couple of foreign policy
things that I think are very important to
this conversation.
You know, there's a lot of different moving
parts to a lot of different conversations, but
it's important to see these kind of massive
shifts. Like, the the Ukraine Russia thing, first
and foremost, let's acknowledge that it didn't end
the war. Okay? That's not what happened. Despite
the claims that it was already over, all
the lies that respond by mainstream alternative media,
it never even slowed down, guys. Trump was
pretending to have a deal. It turned out
they weren't even really trying to make a
deal, and now they funded them more like
we told you from the very beginning. And
even in that gap when they weren't, they
claimed, I showed you that Israel was funding
them, giving them weapons, which is really just
the extension of the same thing. So we've
always been played, guys. I don't think they
ever intended to even slow down, which I
think is self evident at this point. Same
with Israel. Remember the claim of on day
one? Well, that's all we can all laugh
at how silly that is and all the
people that screamed you down for at least
doubting that how unlikely that was.
Discourse
TV. Just in, Trump orders two nuclear submarines
to be positioned
in the appropriate regions after, quote, highly provocative
Russian statements. So many things to talk about
in this, but the reality is your provocative
statements. You mean, like, telling countries we'll do
something to you we've never done in history
if you don't do what I want, which
Trump has said in different variations, like, 50
times
from last and current administrations?
Right? Or or Lindsey Graham, for example, coming
out and saying, nuke Iran? You know, it's
it's just it's absurd to pretend like what
they said is even close to the level
of what they constantly put out in this
country. And usually, it's wise like I've said,
I think twice in the last six months,
Russia or some element of Russia, which is
not always just the Russian government, but people
within the government, or I shouldn't say it
like that, but not always like the the
the current administration,
but like a Lindsey Graham saying something does
not mean Trump's team says that or thinks
that. It's what Lindsey Graham said, but he's
still part of the government. You see, they
in this country, they tend to frame anything
that even associated with Russian anything is than
Russian government. It's easier to frame it that
way. The point, though, is that many times
they've simply come out and said, yeah. Look.
If if you do something, one of the
options on the table is nuclear weapons because
somebody asked that. And then it turns into
by Alice Jones going, World War three, they
threatened nukes, and we're all gonna die. And
it's it's not even remotely what was said.
Even though, as I've said many times, by
the argument you could make from World War
two, we've been at a level of World
War three metric wise for a long time.
So they use that to keep to push
you into certain positions like we just talked
about. But Trump said this,
based on highly provocative statements of the former
president of Russia, former president
okay. So why in the world would the
former president's statements have any bearing on what
you do?
This is propaganda as far as I'm concerned.
Or something very dangerous happening because it doesn't
have anything to do with reality and that
something's forcing some real military moves.
Even if it's a feigned action, the movement
of nuclear subs will have reverberating action.
I mean, can you think what would Israel
and Trump do at this point or the
US government? If they if even something if
if Iran did anything remotely like this, well,
you damn well know what they would do,
something irrational.
But it says, who is now the dep
the deputy chairman of the Security Council of
the Russian Federation. Right. Like I said, not
the leadership,
not the president, not the
inner circle, if you will. But still matters.
Right? It's like, William G. Graham says something,
we still report on it. It says, I
have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned
in the appropriate regions
just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements
are more than just that. It's the same
point. That's the same thing they do every
single day in this country.
Words are very important, he says, to make,
you know, make himself look even more and
can often lead to unintended consequences. Yeah. Are
you really saying that right now? As one
of the most blustering people I've ever seen
in my life, if that's even the right
way to say that, you bluster more than
anybody I've ever seen. You're bombastic. You are
hyperbolic,
and you scream threats at everybody. And in
the meantime, you're coercing them using financial manipulation.
So it's stupid to think that he even
means that. He's just say this is the
justification.
So I wonder what the move is really
about.
Disclose says, there is one week remaining in
Trump's deadline for Putin to make a deal
with Ukraine.
At least that's clearly what the indication could
be. You're just using this as one more
coercive tool, willing to at least threat toward
the idea of nuclear war to get what
you want cause that makes that's a logical
tactic, isn't it?
It's just crazy.
But before we go past that, just, more
thoughts in general, guys, is realizing that
the Ukraine war
has involved Israel and The United States and
plenty of other countries for a long time
and has been used.
And if we remember the reality of Russia,
it's not necessarily good guy, bad guy because
I think all of them are at some
point trying to control your lives, but they've
lied about Russia from the day one in
this conversation. And we showed you in the
beginning, well, before the mainstream alternative media even
talked about this, that this was planned. You
can read these articles as they outlined what
was coming. The clips we played of Lindsey
Graham and McCain in Ukraine telling them this
was coming as I played for you since
02/2017.
It's information you already knew if you watch
this show, like most other things, by the
way. And the reality is they've lied about
this, left and right. And so, I think
Ukraine is a lot more going on, whether
it's about resources, whether it's about any number
of foreign policy overlapping agendas,
or Israel and their Zion, which is a
very real part of the conversation, there's something
bigger there.
But there's also immediate actions around it, you
know, admiring Russia, the how it went down
with Syria. But I think that what we're
seeing here might just be a level of
sort of, like, not just distraction because this
is real. Right? Those movements matter, but something
to draw attention away from other things,
but could cascade as something real. Daniel McAdams
highlighting Trump war room and Trump's tweet here
or his post. I have just been informed
that almost 20,000 Russian soldiers died this month
in the ridiculous war with Ukraine, he says.
Russia has lost a 112,500
soldiers since the beginning of the year. That's
a lot of unnecessary death. Ukraine, however, has
also suffered greatly. They've lost approximately 8,000 soldiers
since 01/01/2025
and that number does not include their missing.
Ukraine has also lost civilians. Like, you could
almost hear everyone going, are you really saying
this while you're adoring Gaza? But he he's
not right now, kind of. We'll come back
to that. But in smaller numbers, he says,
as Russian rockets crash into Kyiv and other
Ukrainian locales.
Right. And what the and the involvement of
the attacks from Ukraine side is Palantir, Anduril,
all the same thing
involving US funding. They are involved with this,
everything that's happening. This is a war that
should never have happened, he says. This is
Biden's war. Biden's war. Not Trump's.
Do you realize how stupid that is? At
Trump's last administration, this was already ongoing, guys.
Not necessarily the current state of it. But
this this goes back to I mean, we've
talked about it going back to 1984 or
excuse me. 1948
in regard to the,
the Azov movement sort of funding of the
radical fascism that they grew there. The CIA,
Operation Aerodynamic, it's very public.
Or during Trump's administration in particular,
when when they were there, when you could
look at them, that's when McCain and and
and and, Lindsey Graham went there stoking these
tensions, guys. It's and foreign policy wrote a
whole article about how they were driving this
into reality.
He knew this, guys. He was there. Now
they're trying to make it about Biden because
the easiest ploy is to go democrat.
Look over there. Because I guess that's how
stupid they think a lot of us are.
Problem, though, is that's not what it's really
about. As Daniel McAdams writes, hundreds of billions
of dollars spent on US intelligence community, and
the president is worse informed on this this
critical issue than somebody in a cave somewhere,
meaning he's wrong about most everything. The point
though, as I don't think that's by accident,
I think it's about misinforming you on purpose.
And guess what? On top of all of
it, did he end the war day one?
Nope. Now we're gonna get Ukrainian refugees
because that's what everyone's calling for. Right? Give
us the Afrikaners. Give us the Ukrainian refugees
in exchange for the other that that's this
is not what anybody's calling for, but it
just continue to show you that there's something
else going on. Here's what he was asked.
Let those Ukrainians who fled the war, to
stay in The United States until the war
ends. I think we will. Yeah. I think
we will. I think we will. We have
a lot of people that came in from
Ukraine,
and we're working with them.
Oh, great. Right. So you're gonna you're gonna
remove people from the country who literally went
through the legal process and have no criminal
record, but you're gonna let a bunch of
Ukrainian neo nazis in the country or some
Afrikaner fascists in the country. They're gonna come
in. And, you know, it's just I'm being
hyperbolic on purpose. But the point is, that
seems ridiculous when you look at the overlap
to all of this. Look at the actual
metrics of what they're dealing with now and
what they're bringing in. And I thought it
was immigration in general.
Don't they keep telling us they've shut down
immigration? Well, clearly not. That's what I keep
talking about. There's more than that, by the
way. There's many different examples of this continuing
in their own way. The problem though,
where is that gonna go? And on top
of that, why are we allowing Ukrainians to
I mean, the all of this comes back
to the US government continue to support what
that is and funding it, using it.
And now they're challenging almost every I mean,
including his own supporters at this point. I
don't know understand why people don't
I I always say it frustrates me that
I'm not seeing more people
who I know don't agree with this, at
least in my experience, the people I talk
to, that I I do I go out
of my way to reach outside of our
echo chambers that we all get forced into.
And it just does not seem like anybody
buys this right now. Anyone's even happy with
what's going on. As I was just told
by somebody close to me that that believes
in Trump, that nobody's believing anything right now.
I just think it's important to think about
that, that we're that they're collapsing in on
selves. And my point is actions like this
or like the Epstein list being a hoax
or an mRNA platform, like, while they're already
doubting, how do you make sense of that
outside of somebody else is driving these choices
or he doesn't care what you think?
And also, let's not forget, as I said
before,
Israel is actively involved in all of this.
Not just because Zelensky wants Ukraine to be
a big Israel, he said, when this first
started. Sort of like now the so called
ruler or leader in in Syria suddenly puts
a suit on and wants to free them.
You know, these are their lackeys, guys. Let's
not forget
the article I talked about. Because you read
Operation Aerodynamic goes back a long way. Multiple
administrations
documents prove the CIA has been cultivating fascism
in Ukraine since at least 1948.
There's one other thing I was just gonna
grab, and I just forgot.
Either way, important to understand this overlapping connection.
Oh, that's what it was, the funding. Which
you I've seen guys have all seen both
of these.
But the reality
I
think that's the one.
Yeah. That in 2020
or 2018,
their own people called out the Israeli government
for funding the Azov movement.
Neo Nazis, literally, title from Horess. Rights groups
demand Israel stop arming neo Nazis. You know,
the same neo Nazis they then went on
to say aren't neo Nazis because that makes
sense. Despite them high you know, giving the
SIG EIL or having Nazi symbols or Azar.
It's just it's it's the same as having
ISIS patches on the people they work with
in Syria and pretending like we don't see
that.
It's just mind blowingly stupid. This is it's
it's this is why, again, think that they're
failing.
People are just not people aren't being
pacified like they were before. This stuff is
in your face. It kind of always has
been, but now they're starting to call it
out. Well, I'll include the show about the
Afrikaners,
which, by the way, is still continuing and
is just another example of how they're misleading
you and it's about other things. But let's
talk about the overlap of immigration because this
is insane to me, how far this has
gone.
In case you missed it already, we've talked
about this many times. And and in in
truth, I prove this to you, the very
first time we really did this in-depth around
the the court documents, '20 April twenty second
twenty twenty five. The unprecedented gaslighting and lies
around Abrego Garcia.
That doesn't mean we know for a fact
he's not a criminal, but anything they've ever
tried to present to make that case, they've
either lied about at or have been proven
to be wrong.
MS 13 connections, proven to be wrong. Claims
of try human trafficking,
proven to be wrong.
Now, you may you may if you're out
there thinking this is all in the works,
it's not, guys. They've lost already, and it's
continuing that direction. That's why they're trying to
distance themselves from it. They're trying to go
in other directions. Some nuclear submarines. You know,
maybe. But
this is all imploding. Right? People have come
back, and I'm gonna get to that next.
The Secot discussion
is unreal,
and they're sending people or tried to send
him. Right? They sent people like Andre, the
the barber that went there who got who
got sexually abused and beat up. We'll go
over all of it because he had the
tattoo they claimed was something, and it wasn't.
He's now free. They're just trying to hide
from all these guys. This is egregious, and
we're gonna get to the point to where
we're seeing yet again more American citizens being
arrested without any they're not identifying themselves. They're
not presenting warrants. They're bursting into places in
people's homes and arresting American citizens.
This should be absolutely chilling. See, this is
one of the points I was talking about
before.
How is that not, like,
red I mean, alarming doesn't even do it
justice.
You have American Gestapo breaking into people's homes
without due diligence, without
warrants, identification,
and arresting people without showing them who they
are, without listening to the fact that they're
American citizens and putting them in jail, and
then, you know, maybe getting out. We've already
seen American citizens deported. We've already seen people
sent who were legally in this country with
no criminal record. And Trump has said, you're
next, more than once, or at least possibly.
And I just think it's important to realize
how over the top all this has gotten.
Melnick points out important. The Trump administration
initially wanted to pretend that mister Abrego Garcia
was an MS thirteen leader or even a
member.
Now a fourth judge realized this is left
and right. They don't this is why it's
gotten so little attention because at the highest
level, they're mostly conservative judges. But everywhere at
this point, there's been Texas judges. There's been
judges across the way. Miller has stopped screaming
about the activist judges and the coup, you
know, led judicial coup because it's being obviously
shown to be everybody.
So first and foremost, recognize how much that
shows you that Miller's a liar, that everyone
screaming that was trying to deceive you because
they knew what they were doing. Important to
think about. It says now a fourth federal
judge has found that the evidence doesn't show,
does not show, even that he's a member
of the gang. And that after the Trump
admin spent months
literally scouring for anything, and I argue trying
to make it up because they just got
caught doing that with the trafficking part of
it. If you don't remember that part, remember,
they tried to claim he was trafficking
by using an old traffic stop that he
was let go with a ticket
and tried to claim somebody new, testified that
he was a bat he was an evil
trafficker for I was 13.
And the judge looked at it and literally
proved because of the timing they gave that
it was impossible, that it wasn't even possible
that what they claim was doing was happening.
And and guess what? The guy that they
used to make that claim, he's actually charged
and found guilty of human trafficking. He's actually
been caught, I think it was six five
or six times being deported from this country
and has come back. They let him stay
in this country for a year at least.
That was all testified to if he gave
testimony about Garcia, who they've now proven is
false, but that guy has to stay. You're
trying to remove a person who's not guilty
and keep an actual illegal immigrant, human trafficking,
possible terror, you know, all the things they
say, but he can stay. Meanwhile, we'll we'll
give all the MS thirteen leaders passes and
send them back to El Salvador because Bukele's
gotta deal with them. Also, public story.
Wild.
So here
is the post he put out, judge Crenshaw,
on the allegations, and you can read it
for yourself. It says for the court to
find that Abrego's a member is a member
of or is in affiliation with m f
MS thirteen, it would have to make so
many inferences from the government's proffered evidence
in its favor that such conclusion would border
on fanciful.
Insane. It's all court documents. Again, right in
my show here, the first, what, seven or
what bit more than that. 12 links are
all directly from court documents that quite literally
prove that they were lying about what they
were do saying about them. And here we
are. The whole of government, guys,
screaming things that you could prove are false.
Miller coming out and claiming they won a
seven to zero Supreme Court ruling. No. They
lost. They lost seven to zero. Easy to
look up. And he just lied right in
the Oval
Office. How do you not see what that
shows you? That guy doesn't care about American
interest. He's making us all look like fools.
So
beyond that,
Andre Hernandez Romero,
he entered legally,
did not break the law in The United
States. He waited in Mexico,
then went to a port of entry where
while there, some keystone cops is full of
a CBP officer thought his mom and dad
tattoos were gang tattoos or didn't even care,
used it as an excuse, sent him to
ICE detention.
From there, he got sent to El Salvador,
to where from which he just came back
from. From yeah. What he just got home
from that. And you will I'm gonna read
to you directly from this article that is
just chilling.
This is the the gay makeup artist describes
horrific sexual abuse, physical abuse in Cicotte.
So before we get to that, in beyond
just him, it says further stories of horrors
inflicted on people at
people the Trump administration imprisoned in El Salvador
without trial
are emerging.
Without trial, people who were here legally,
in some cases, had visas, green cards, who
have constitutional rights, even if you're an illegal
alien. That's due process. You're right. And regardless,
and anybody who's still arguing otherwise is either
too stupid to know they're wrong or lying
to you. And the reality is they did
all of this to people who don't even
if they were actually illegal immigrants and broke
the law to get in here. Sending them
to this place is a travesty of justice.
The it says the three men describe how
they were punished by guards, stripped naked, beaten
for six hours or six days straight
as men and women watched, laughed, and mocked
them. Doesn't that certainly sound doesn't sound like
what we see going on in Sid Tiamin,
Israeli prison?
Sounds very familiar.
So here is the article.
Welcome to hell.
Inside the mega prison where The US deported
migrants.
Now welcome to hell, that might actually sound
kinda familiar. You know why? Because it's exactly
the same high head high, title
that Petsello wrote about the Ted Siuman torture
Prison torture camp that they literally called it.
This is where you can read for yourself
they raped prisoners and still continue to do
apparently. And it's cheered on by their corporate
media.
So it says interviews with 16 former detainees
of El Salvador's terrorism confinement center off offer
the most complete view yet of conditions at
the notorious prison.
Now we've talked about the conditions there, which
aren't even secret,
but it's worse than you think. And the
reality is until now, we haven't had this
has been, you know, secondhand information. Well, technically,
it still is people that were well, since
we're reading it through the platform, but these
are people that were there. And no one's
disputing this information because there's already you know,
the reality is appears that they want this
place to be seen as the some nightmare
as some kind of tool. But the reality
is they're working with the people that they're
supposed to scare with that, the MS thirteen
leaders.
All public, guys. So there's not even a
real the the illusion of some kind of
saving the country dynamic is just not true.
They suspended civil liberties. They're lying to the
rest of the world. And you there are
people, I'm sure, that claim that they're happier
with one thing or the other, but the
reality is that that's not what anybody
the the idea of allowing the gang members
to run the country through bouquet lay and
to shut down civil liberties, let's not pretend
like anybody thinks that makes sense. These are
people trying to drive in some kind of
technocratic fuel state, and they want that to
be the model. Look at Prospera. It's the
same illusion.
One detainee was beaten unconscious.
Others emerged from the dark isolation room covered
in bruises, struggling to walk or vomiting blood.
Another returned to his cell in tears, telling
fellow detainees he had just been sexually assaulted.
It says, let him take, let's hit him
like a pinata.
Guards shouted amid the beatings. Detainees recalled the
blows echoing across the metal walls.
It says the mat the matching firsthand accounts
across multiple interviews
offer the most complete view yet of conditions
inside the mega prison where inmates are the
denied access to lawyers. How is that even
I mean, this is the whole thing. There's
so many elements to this. Even if you
don't agree,
they were in this country, had constitutional
rights.
That applies. The fact that you sent them
away doesn't you're still violating those rights by
not allowing it is to happen. Due process,
representation,
and almost all contact with the outside world
doesn't exist.
And where about 14,000
Salvadorians
remain incarcerated.
Now that includes the 270
something people they sent there, most of which
are simply people who were in this country
with the wrong skin color.
Not illegally here, had no criminal record.
And it says,
few detainees have ever left CCOT until now,
and fewer have ever spoken publicly of their
experience there.
Now look at this. This is the cell
they exist in.
Each group cell typically holds about eighty
eight zero eighty inmates
39 feet long 24 feet across or whichever
way thirty four point thirty nine point four
by 24.6
That's not a joke. Look at the map.
Look at that. They can't even all stand
up at the same time without being basically
shoulder to shoulder. That's how what do you
how can you possibly describe that as even
a prison?
And they almost never leave. We'll read you
we'll we'll read it directly from the article.
But you already knew. I already told you
that before because they reported that.
The men slept on metal bunks,
usually with no cushions,
in group cells where overhead lights blaze twenty
four hours a day,
rarely allowed out of their cells.
Damien Merlot
or, yeah, Merlot,
a US based lobbyist for Salvadorian president Bukele,
described the detainees as criminals who belong in
prison and said their claims are baseless.
You understand the reality is we absolutely, for
a fact, know that's not true. One, that
their claims are proven by other testimony, including
from the Salvadorian government, but the fact that
we know they're not criminals because we're now
proving that, and we already have. But Andre's
home, you understand. He can prove for himself.
He's the one giving testimony.
No one's claiming he's a terrorist. He's not.
You could look for yourself. So even if
you wanna say that one person
is the anomaly, it still matters, but we
also know that's not the case.
It's not the exception. It's the rule, guys.
The facts are clear, and yet here they
are. And here are the politicians like Tricia
McLaughlin still lying to you about that because
what else are they gonna do? McLaughlin,
spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, provided
a statement that repeated and administration claims that
the detainees were members of the trendy Iraq
war gang even though they've proven not to
be. Though government officials have acknowledged in court
that many of those sent to CCOT
had no criminal record.
So she's just doing her job, lying.
Robert l Serna, the acting field office director
of the, at ICE,
said in the court filing in March that
the, quote, this is I we we reported
this already. This is something special.
That the, quote, lack of a criminal record
does not indicate they pose a limited threat.
And that the limited information about each individual,
quote, actually highlights the risk they pose.
So this without the second part, you could
have been like, okay. Just because they don't
have a criminal record does not mean they're
not a criminal. Everyone could agree with that.
But then the fact is you're arguing that
the fact that they don't have a criminal
record somehow then poses the risk. That's what
shows you they're originally don't have a criminal.
That's guilty until proven innocent based on your
subjective
opinion. I mean, that's insane.
The fact if they don't have a criminal
record, even if they've got a tattoo, that's
still not enough to put them in prison
or do anything. They're not breaking the law
by having a tattoo, let alone one that
has nothing to do with any of these
gangs. Or Or the experts will tell you
they don't even use them that way. It's
just insane. That's that's specifically, I think, trendy
to Uruguay. But the point
is that these things are being used. They're
lying to you to arrest innocent people. And
you must be able to see that these
statements show you that they know what they're
doing.
The lack of information shows you they're a
risk? That's insane. That's Orwellian.
President Trump and secretary Noem will not allow
criminal gangs to terrorize American citizens.
Okay. That has nothing to do with this.
You're making a broad statement about something you
claim, and over here, you're arresting innocent people.
So because you scream we're not gonna let
gangs take over does not mean that person's
guilty. But see, that's how dumb they think
you are Or maybe how dumb they are.
You can decide. Once again, the media is
falling all over themselves, McLaughlin says, to defend
criminal illegal gang members or not though, or
not, or that they're not gang members and
you're caught lying about it and you're still
desperately flailing about how they're criminals even though
they're home and you can prove they're not.
Not every single one of them. And clearly,
I made the point. I bet you some
of them are.
That does not make it okay that they
have now arrested so many people who don't
deserve to be there, not for any reason,
let alone because they're gang members.
Violated UN conventions against torture to which El
Salvador and The US are signatories.
That's happening there.
There's testimony I will give to you, but
that they're torturing people and that what they're
doing there
appear to be violations of what they've signed
in regard to the UN conventions against torture
and everything else. They don't care.
Quote, based on the information I have reviewed,
said Santiago Canton, secretary general of the IC
or the International Commission of Jurists,
quote, there are reasonable grounds for an investigation
by the ICC
into what's happening there. I hope that happens.
The Post has found that many
of the detainees, as I've told you repeatedly,
had entered The United States legally,
L E G A L L Y, legally,
and were actively complying
with the law, with the rules, with the
immigration
law and rules.
That's many. I most, guys. And you can
prove that from the first 270, so many
people, most of the the they did a
report. I think in your times, they report.
I personally went through it. You can prove
that most of them were just people in
the wrong place at the wrong time with
a tattoo.
And so now you can broaden it out
to all that's happened since then. And it
still seems like the majority to me, but
it's hard to know with all the different
moving parts. The reality, though, is you can
prove it. You could prove it. They were
here legally, had no criminal record.
This is insane to me. Here's a couple
of examples. Marco Jesus, Bastulo. And the real
bigger point for all of us is that's
not supposed to be what Americans believe.
That that's ins what we're what you have
if if Biden had done this,
let's just say to Ukrainians or to Afrikaners,
would that would you suddenly care? I mean,
the reality that this is counter to what
you've always told the world that this country
is should show you that you either don't
believe those things or you're willing to sacrifice
them when it comes to your political side.
This is,
Marco Jesus Bustillo.
Or is that how you say it? It's,
Bastul Basulto.
Sanilas. 35 years old. Temporary protected status.
So right there, they got same ideas that
regardless of how he got it, whether Biden
gave it to him or it's from before,
it doesn't mean they could just disregard it.
It's the same thing that Trump did for
the Afroconers. Right? He waved his hand and
gave them allowance here. Same difference.
So this person had protected status
for from deportation and worked legally in kitchens
and pizzerias to pay for his mother's breast
cancer treatments back home. He was sent to
El Salvador. No crime on record.
Here legally.
And see, many of them aren't just, you
know, protected status or, like, seeking be let
seeking, citizenship, but are have green cards, visas.
And Marco Rubio says they paid Israel, so
send them to a foreign country, put them
in prison for life.
Andre Hernandez,
31 year old makeup artist, entered The US
legally with a CBP one appointment, we told
you this already, where an official in the
preliminary screening determined he had shown a credible
fear of prosecution
as a gay man living and working in
Venezuela.
Roger Molina, a food remember, all these people
got sent to El Salvador,
and Andre is now home telling you a
story. Roger Molina, a food delivery driver, an
aspiring professional soccer player, had been vetted by
US citizenship and immigration services and federal law
enforcement. That happened.
Flown to The US and conditionally accepted into
a State Department resettlement program for refugees.
Then one day, they arrested him, Semmes El
Salvador. That happened.
As the detained men were shuttled to onto
flights on in Texas on March 15, None
were told where they were even being taken.
Some migrants refused to get off the plane
when they got there. Now this is actually
a terrifying side of this. Now, see, these
people didn't know where they were going. They
many of which were like, I have a
green card. Like, I'm not breaking the law.
Then they think, okay. Well, shoot. I guess
they're just sending me back to Venezuela, which
is where many are more from.
Then they show up at a
high security
concentration camp in a foreign country.
I mean, imagine that. Then they they go
like, what's wrong? I'm not I don't wanna
get out here. I'm not I'm not breaking
the law. Nobody wanted to hear it. Some
of them refused to get off. A a
guard struck a female passenger.
Screams filled the plane. Eventually,
Basulto and other detainees said they were kicked,
shoved, beaten, and forced off. Two Salvadorian guards
grabbed grabbed their arms.
Throw them throw them down, they yelled, as
detainees were pummeled and dragged to buses, according
to detainee,
Rojas,
Mendoza.
He recounted watching one man get slammed so
hard against the bus that his face began
gushing blood. Now, of course, these are personal
testimonies. They could be misguided. They could be
wrong. They could be lying. They could misremember.
The point, though, is across all of them,
the consistency is undeniable. And, again, they're not
even really denying that this stuff is happening.
They claim, like, this is what we want
because they're all evil criminals, but they're not,
though.
Molina, the refugee who had been vetted for
resettlement in The United States begged the officers
for an explanation.
He says, please, I don't understand what I'm
doing here. I haven't committed any crime. Please
let me talk to somebody. He began to
pray. Then the Salvadorian officer grabbed him by
the neck. It said he says, run, you
son of a b I t z h.
He command he commanded him according to Molina
and jammed his rifle into his ribs.
Welcome to El Salvador. Hooded officers shouted on
the ride. Six detainees said, welcome to hell.
Welcome to hell.
Here, the director said the men would have
no rights. The amount this is my point.
They claimed this. They public about this. They'd
have no rights, no right to a lawyer,
no access to the sun. These were this
is their briefing. They were told this while
they're sitting on their knees being punished for
the first six hours sitting there waiting.
No rights, no lawyer, no sun. They would
not eat chicken or meat for the rest
of their lives. That's what they were told.
The only way you'll leave, they were said,
quote, is in inside of a black bag.
Can you just imagine that? Imagine if your
mother, your sister, your brother was sent there
because they happen to be in the wrong
place. Would you still be okay with this?
The doctor, quote, would cat would watch us
get beaten
and then ask us, how are you feeling
with a smile?
It was the most perverse form of humiliation.
When Tito Martinez, 26, was an in immigration
detention in The US, he said a doctor
told him he had kidney failure and would
need a transplant.
After repeated beatings at CCOT so that was
an an issue from before. Now he's in
CCOT with the same problem. After repeated beatings
in CCOT, Martinez said he could no longer
get out of bed. He would wet himself,
and he relied on Selmais to feed him.
Apparently, they laughed about it.
Sub detainees attempted suicide by tying sheets around
their necks or using rusted pipes to cut
their veins. Disobeying rules proved costly. When Hernandez's
head that's Andre, who's now home. When his
head was ate head ate from the heat
because there's basically, like, apparently no air conditioning.
It's in the middle of you know, it's
it's just this is a torture camp, guys.
When his head ache from the heat, he
tried to cool down by bathing. He forgot
to tell his friends to watch for the
guards.
Get up, you piece of s h I
t, they said to him.
He was taken to a place called La
Isla, the an island, they that's what they
call it, where a tiny hole in the
ceiling provided only a needle of light and
almost no air at a time when he's
already struggling from the heat. Four men entered
and began touching him with their clubs and
putting them between his legs. One forced Hernandez
to perform oral sex on him.
And and, I mean, this is not a
unique statement.
Co conditions improved only when outsiders visited the
prison or when government officials wanted photographs. Yeah.
Sounds sort of like they called the North
Korea to it. Right? This is not unique
to that this is what your governments do
all the time. Multiple detainees said this. Shortly
after Red Cross visit, Bibles were handed out.
For a visit by DHS,
Nome,
the detainees were given better food, even mattresses,
though thin.
When a group of US politicians tour the
prison,
detainees with visible injuries were moved to the
small the remotest cell so they couldn't be
seen.
The American dream had become a nightmare.
And you need you it's worth reading this
whole thing. That's just a summation of the
I mean,
even if everything they said is true, is
this who we are?
Is this what we believe we represent?
On top of that, they're not criminals. They
were here legally.
And the kind of person that is allowing
this to happen and cheering it on, there's
something deficient in you. There's something wrong here.
Same kind of person that seems to be
supporting a genocide in Israel, by the way.
Welcome to hell.
Well, on top of that, the intercept reports
on the thirty first, the national guard
the national guard has now been ordered to
do ISIS paperwork
at immigration facilities in 20 states. It's not
like they had more important things to do.
Right? We We can have we can make
them do the paperwork for all the stuff
that we're all the people we're abusing in
this country.
I mean, it's just not a secret, guys.
They're they're, by and large, violating rights and
breaking the law. And now they're forcing people
in national guard to take a part of
that criminal activity.
Here's a terrible reality. I this actually break
kills me. Not only that this is what's
being reported by CNN, the way they deal
with Khalil, absurd.
Still at this point today going, do you
condemn Hamas?
Like, these people deserve ridicule. Like, you should
be laughed out of town with this kind
of stupidity. But remember, they're just propaganda talking
heads.
But then it was posted by Homeland Security.
Homeland Security, dhs.gov
or dhsgov
account posted this and says, Mahmoud Khalil
refuses to condemn Hamas
because he is
a terrorist sympathizer,
which what does that even mean?
Is there some kind of criminal code that
says you simply I mean, let's be real.
That's not the truth As he'll say clearly,
clearly, I condemn any violence against anybody. But
that's not what they want. Right? We want
you to focus on because they're trying to
make it that so they can make these
stupid statements.
Regardless of all of it, as this person
says, you're literally citing speech
or lack thereof.
I protected first amendment
as a reason to deport a lawful permanent
resident.
See, there are people with brain out brains
out there that can recognize this is insane.
This is violating everything we hold sacred because
of Israel,
for Israel. Because remember, it was b t,
Batar USA, a major Zionist group that handpicked
him, pointed to him, tagged Trump, tagged Rubio,
tagged Bondi, tagged Noam, and he got arrested
the next day.
And now he's out because there's no crime.
There's nothing he didn't do anything wrong. Even
the lies about what they did and terrorizing
Jews and locking people in the library. Nope.
All fake. All false. Everything's been proven. That's
why he's not in jail.
And even then, those things are not what
what they're claiming is all hyperbolic
misrepresentation in the first place. I'll play it
for you. But it says, not because DHS
painted him as one. He's branded himself as
antisemite
through his own hateful believer. I mean, it's
just worth this is
cartoonish.
It is a privilege to be granted a
visa or a green card, to live and
study in The United States, same stupid recited
narrative. The Trump administration acted well within its
statutory constitution of glory. No. It didn't.
Straight up, completely textbook did not. As they
say down there, you are citing speech.
And now look. There's no rule. There's nothing
around this that says that because you stand
up and say, I criticize Israel's actions in
Gaza, that you have your I I went
textbook through what can be used to remove
a green card or a Visa, not even
close.
It says as it does with any alien
who advocates violence, which he never did, glorify
supports terrorists, which he never did, harasses Jews,
which he never did, and damages property, which
he literally never did. I mean, do they
not they think we're this stupid? If you're
gonna claim he damaged property and harassed,
called for violence, why is he not in
jail right now? You know, he was not
even found guilty of any crime, and they
want you to believe. It's the same thing
they're telling you right now. Obama's treason.
Well, let's be clear. I think Obama is
a criminal like the rest of them are,
but you're calling him a treasonous. He you're
you're you're you're you're,
accusing him of treason,
and he's not in jail.
How is that possible? Right? That's been he's
been floating that for a week now.
You see my point? They're they're just using
narrative, guys. This is about manipulation.
Here's the clip. This this is gonna upset
you. It should because it's insane what they're
doing here. Here, though. Do you specifically
condemn Hamas, a designated terrorist organization
in The United States, not just for their
actions on October 7?
I I condemn the killing of Orpelle of
of of all, civilians. Full stop.
Right. If that's not the most clear thing
in the world, I don't know what is.
You see, that's not what they want. They
don't like that. You're not allowed to say,
all lives matter. You know, that's it's the
same stupid thing.
Yes. I I'm the same look. A 100%.
All in everyone, no matter what, it should
matter. And, by the way, that's not the
first time he did it. This is just
a clip. So they're reiterating the point, and
he's going, look. I condemn all violence against
all civilians.
That is far more of a noble stance
than the idiocy here of claiming you only
care about one side and, really, the side
that was funded by Israel and the side
that is you know, all the same narratives.
And, by the way, was one day, and
now we've seen a year plus of ongoing
genocide that they don't care about. Insane.
And but what I I I I don't
wanna get into is is,
a designated terrorist organization
in The United States,
not just for their actions on October 7.
I I condemn the killing of our pal
of of of old, civilians, full stop.
And but what I I I I don't
wanna get into is is I'm sorry. I
said
it's like I mean, she has to be
people that do that, like Piers Morgan, have
to either be the dumbest person in the
room or somebody's screaming in their ear.
I condemn
all violence against all people,
But do you condemn Hamas? Are you stupid?
Did you just did you not hear what
I just said? I condemn that would include
Hamas. Do you understand language? But you see,
it's not about they know it. They're not
dumb. It's about a propaganda tactic, guys.
Just makes me laugh. And but what I
I I I don't wanna get into is
is,
no. I I I I I I I
I I I am very clear with with
condemning all civilians. I'm I'm very Clearly meant
attacks on all civilians. Very straight in my
position in in in that in that,
part. But it's it's disingenuous to ask about
condemning Hamas while Palestinians are the ones being
starved now by Israel. It's, not condemning October
6 where By the way, by the way,
Wolf Blitzer just nodded his head right there.
Like, this is an interesting overlap. Remember, all
the way back when, he had he even
paled and bocked when they tried to tell
him that it was okay they killed hundreds
of people for go to go after a
a Hamas commander that turned out not even
gonna be there. Live on TV, not even
Wolf Blitzer could swallow that. Watch again. Just
watch he nod his head very slightly, but
I think it's very important right now. By
Israel. It's, not condemning October 6 where 02/2006
to ask about condemning Hamas while Palestinians are
the ones being starved now by Israel. It's,
not condemning October 6 where 260
Palestinians were killed, by Israel on before before
October 7.
So I hate the selective
selective outrage of condemnation because this is not
this would wouldn't lead wouldn't lead to to
to, a constructive conversation.
Do you think she's even listening?
Just waiting for a moment to put put
put Hamas, though. Put Hamas? What about Hamas,
though? And and this is also, like, what
we wanna deal with is the root causes
of of why that happened. Right. And and
it's it's in no way anyone can justify
Just to be clear just to be clear,
Mahmoud Yeah. We did ask about you know,
we talked at length about your views, of
course, on the Palestinians, but it is fair
to ask you about whether you condemn Hamas
because the Trump administration has claimed that you
are Hamas sympathizer.
So it's very Okay. So because the government
levels a completely baseless fact free claim, it's
okay that she asked it four times in
a row to get you to answer the
question you've already asked answered four times in
a row. Because, well, this idiot government keeps
screaming that, so keep asking the question. That's
not journalism. That's propaganda, guys. And he's I
mean, he's doing an incredible job maintaining his,
you know, measure discussion here. But if you
if it's outside of what Trump and and
the team are claiming,
look at him. Listen to him. Look for
yourself about his background. Look at the videos
they claim he did something wrong. It's insane.
He's a very measured, very well presented, very
calm, very educated,
very, you know, condemns violence from any side,
all of them, and is supported by everybody.
All sides of the conversation. Jewish people came
out left and right to stand behind him
because these people were misrepresenting him. They was
chosen by the by the person in the
middle of the negotiations because everybody respected him,
And yet they frame that as the one
representing terrorism?
It's just it is so grossly dishonest at
the highest level. They're deliberately lying to you
about somebody like him or Garcia or Ozturk
or anybody out there who's criticizing what's going
on because they're terrible people who are trying
to deceive you. That's not my opinion.
I may maybe aside from the terrible part,
but they knowingly are trying to misrepresent the
facts.
What else do you call that?
Important to actually ask that question in this
broad No way anyone can justify Just to
be clear. Killing killing just to be clear,
Mahmoud Yeah. We did ask about you know,
we talked at length about your views, of
course, on the Palestinians, but it is fair
to ask you about whether you condemn Hamas
because the Trump administration has claimed that you
are Hamas sympathizer. So it's very important to
actually ask that question in this broad conversation.
Yeah. I I simply I simply asked and
protested,
the war in in in Palestine. Yep. That's
it. That's the only thing that happened. He
protested what's happening against the Palestinians.
Period.
And right before that, he said it's it's,
you know what was it? Right here.
No way anyone can justify
the killing of civilians. There's no way anyone
can justify the killing of civilians.
But just to be clear, I mean, do
you condemn Hamas?
This is a cartoon. I mean, we've all
laughed about this for a long time because
it's that stupid. There's, like, skits and and,
you know, cartoons, like, actual graphic. It's just
that stupid. Even Piers Morgan occasionally does that.
I've got a clip coming up of him
with Megyn Kelly that's gonna make you throw
up in your mouth.
I just can't believe this stuff, guys. And
see, this is every one of these things
clearly intertwines with what Zionism has to do
with all of these things. You can't this
is we're on immigration right now.
So here is another example, by the way,
and how this overlaps into the American citizen
side of this. We covered this on fine
points. We'll be doing another one on Monday,
by the way. It'll be on I think
it's on the BitChute main account,
but I'll be posting it on my site
so you guys can see it.
Quote, you have no rights. You're a MIGO.
MIGO. MIGO. Whatever the the way they say
it, like a migrant is what they're saying.
He's a US citizen.
I'm gonna play this for you.
This is happening everywhere. The next one's even
worse.
It says,
though Linus
Ambrosio
Ambrosio repeatedly stated he was a citizen and
provided identification,
his two friends were undocumented.
Which okay. So their their people are breaking
the law.
Even the way they handled them shows you
this is so far outside the realm of
anything we've seen before,
but he was a US citizen, not breaking
the law by just being next to these
people. Agents dragged one friend out of the
van,
slammed him to the ground before and nobody
was resisting, by the way. I'll show it
to you. It deployed a stun gun on
his back. The other friend was put in
a choke hold after the officer propped the
door open.
The, the US citizen was pushed to the
ground and then a stun gun aimed at
him. He was subsequently held in a cell
at the at the CP at the customs
and border, protection station for six hours, later
being charged with obstruction
without violence and sentenced to ten hours of
community service and a four hour anger management
course for simply saying treat them like human
beings.
Arrest them normal. Like, yes, they break the
you know, they're they're illegal immigrants, but why
do you have to punch them in the
face? Why do you have to throw them
on the ground? Same point here, when he's
an American citizen
who they treat like a criminal because he's
simply there.
You can't miss where this is going, guys.
Every single moment, they're encroaching further on your
rights and anybody's rights. But I guess it
only matters specifically to people on one side
about a mere you know, your personal rights
and your friends and family as opposed to
anybody else, but this is where it's going.
Not hyperbolic. It's literally happening.
Okay.
And two male
friends.
Wait.
Wait. Hold up.
Hold up. Hold up, Matthew. What? You guys
have no rights to do that. We don't
have rights to do that? No.
Well, so here's what's interesting.
Right in the beginning because it doesn't appear
that there was any violation. Like, this is
this is because of what they look like.
And so the question becomes, what is and
this is the main point about whether if
which we know as a fact that everybody,
illegal immigrants, anybody in this country is protected
under constitutional rights. It's an easy thing to
prove. The mill fifth, fourteenth amendment. It's very
clear.
So that means that when they come up
to this car,
there are legal realities here, especially for him
as the person driving. The idea being that
you can't just burst into my car and
grab things without truly knowing what's happening. Now
the guy did say he was illegal, so
that might change the overlap of that, but
there's still a process to this. That's one
of the larger points to this. Not just
the US citizen being caught up in it,
but the idea that they're not far they're
again, they're not
they're masked. They're not identifying themselves. They're not
producing warrants for US citizens or otherwise.
That should matter to everybody.
You can see for yourself. I mean, the
the the information the the reality, not even
from them. There's nobody, like, resisting. They just
grab them out of the car and treat
them this way.
Woah. Wait.
No. You can't No. Wait. Get back. You
can't grab me like that. You can't drive
me like that. Okay. Okay. Okay. What's the
point of that? Hey. Wait. That's not how
you already Get on the ground. I don't
know how you already Get on the ground.
So, again, right there, why wouldn't you just
put him against the car, handcuff him like
any other normal person?
What what is the point of and so
let me ask you this. You're getting arrested
whether illegal or not, and somebody you and
you're following orders.
And somebody starts punching you in the back,
starts, you know, forcing your head to the
ground or doing something that make gives you
pain. Are you just gonna let it happen,
or how long are you gonna let it
happen?
So peep you always get the people in
the towel. You should not just let them
do what they want.
Rights matter. Okay? And the reality is they're
treating these people like they're not human. They're
beating them up. They're tasing them because they're
resisting the violence they do against them, which
is unjust.
But even then, you barely even that. Watch.
Now on the ground. Alright. But you guys
Go on the ground. Go on. Go on.
Go on. Go on.
Alright. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Alright.
Hey. What you guys doing? That's not how
you arrest people. If y'all gonna arrest people,
y'all gotta arrest people regularly.
What what y'all doing, bro? Hey. Hey.
I cannot, bro. They gonna they gonna push
me. They gonna do whatever they were doing
to
him. No. I'm not gonna get up. I'm
not gonna get up. I'm not gonna get
up. I'm a just stay like this. I'm
a just stay like this, bro.
Y'all scaring the dude, bro. That's not how
you arrest people.
Here. I can take it. I got rights
to talk, bro. You got no rights here.
I do. Illegal, bro.
See? Okay. So now because
one person identifies as an illegal person in
the car, suddenly everyone in the car is
illegal. We're not even gonna look. We're gonna
just rush forward with all of them are
because he was without even verifying that. So
he admits to it. How do you know
he's not lying? What if he's wrong? What
if you know, probably not likely. My point
though is that you haven't verified that fact.
And now you're acting and violating American citizen
rights because you see you don't have any
rights. You're you're illegal, man. Get out of
here. Without even knowing that, without caring, and
in fact, he's wrong.
The kind of person that pretends to care
about human rights or American rights or US
rights constitutional rights and then looks at this
and brushes it off because you're on a
political side, you're a child. You are the
problem in this country today, and I think
it's the minority.
Get up.
I was born and raised you know? What
about
I was born and raised. Okay.
Alright.
Agent could be heard bragging about making light
of the rest. Once she got that proper
sperm on him, he will He's gone. He's
funny, bro. He's funny. You guys don't think
he is. He does.
He's starting to resist more now.
We're gonna end up shooting They're starting to
resist more now, which very clearly was not
what you just saw. We're gonna end up
shooting some of them, himself. If you can
go like this, they're they're gonna stop fighting.
And the point made, which is even been
made in congress, if you're showing up now
this is different because there was a police
car present. But if you're showing up in
places where you're not identifying yourself, in situations
where you're not clearly present present as an
officer,
why wouldn't you fight back? Some masked random
person grabs your arm, you're damn right I'm
swinging. But of course, then you could charge
for violence or whatever. That that's what continued
to happen. So why the idea and on
top of that, how many stories have we
already shown you of people pretending to be
ice and raping people, stealing from people? I've
shown you four myself.
They're creating this situation,
probably by design. Just fear.
Maybe this kid goes like, just chill. Let's
try you. Oh, you can do that. I'm
not doing shit.
You're right.
We told you already to get out. Oh.
You're the guy. Oh, right. Just get out
of the car because we said so. Yeah.
Is that what we all pretend this is?
That's not how this country works, guys.
You have rights.
They're they're just making it very clear without
even knowing for sure that they don't care
for a second Because they've been given the
they they know they don't are not gonna
be held accountable, at least with this current
administration. Yeah. I don't know. I wanna point
out the break. Yeah.
Damn. Now this is why we've seen a
break in windows
when people just go, you know, I no.
I'm not. I what what do you might
what are they pulled over for? You don't
know who I am. I don't know who
you are. I'm not just gonna roll you
know, you're clearly coming up with heat. I'm
no. I'm not doing then they bust the
window, drag them out of the car. No
one's even been identified yet, guys. How is
that possible?
Adrenaline junkie.
Smell that too. He says, just remember, you
can smell that $30,000
bonus.
Because clearly that's not driving their illegal actions
at all. Right?
There's one story.
Here's a sad one.
ICE raids Florida family
home. Arrests US citizen, mother, and children. Daughter
answered the door. Agents pointed guns and stormed
in. They took all of us, they say,
but they're not supposed to. We're American citizens.
She and her brothers were arrested, forced to
wear ankle monitors for release. Her mother was
charged with assaulting agents. She was holding a
pot with eggs inside of it for breakfast.
Here's the clip.
This is security video from a home on
40 First Street in Tampa as Homeland Security
investigators
and ICE agents came to take Marvin Casarez
into custody. When they came, they're saying to
open the door and all that.
And
they tried to grab him, and they started,
like, bringing guns at him. Brenda Louise Fuentes
was inside the home as authorities
came to arrest her stepfather. They took all
of us. We're not supposed to. We're American
citizens. They took all of us. She and
her brothers were born in America and are
American citizens.
They were arrested anyway. They flipped my beds
over like if they were looking for drugs,
then they have no warrant. They had no
reason to come inside my house. The family
says authorities did not have warrants. But when
their mother came outside, things took a turn
for the worse.
Now remember,
we've already talked about this, and we're gonna
make a point about it in a second.
To some of these people in the conversation,
you're not the right kind of American. Right?
You may be an American citizen, but you're
not really an American, and that's a really
terrifying thought.
That's where this is going. But, yes, you
are. From every legal perspective and principle and
everything else, yes, you are. The reality is
they're trying to create circumstance where if you're
brown, you're guilty by association.
They're not even checking. This is my larger
point.
According to a criminal complaint, Mary Vasquez Cruz
came outside with a pot over her head
and tried to hit the officers.
She says she remembers going out with a
pot but with eggs inside it. But in
no moment, she, hit no one with the
pot. Authorities Okay. Well, let's let's be rational.
It's it's clear it's certainly possible
that that's her the daughter, you know, kind
of downplaying it for her mother, which wouldn't
surprise me. But at the same time, that's
possible that it did go that way. But
the real point is you're watching this happen.
No one's identifying themselves. You don't know what's
happening. It's my same point. So you come
out with the pot going, what what is
going on? You're taking my US citizen family.
You know, the that's illegal.
But that doesn't matter. Right? It's so it's
like the IRS. They can violate you every
which way, but you have to follow every
rule when it's up when it's your turn.
That's it. That's how these people operate today.
That is your government. We're the government, and
we're here to help.
Also arrested Alfredo, charging him with assaulting federal
agents. They just pointed guns at us in
our face. They told us to open the
door. If not, they were gonna break it
down. They didn't have no warrant.
Doesn't that matter to anybody?
Yeah. Oh, look. He got a tattoo on
his neck. He's probably a bad person. Whatever
your whatever you need to tell yourself to
make sure you could ignore what you're supposed
to care about. It doesn't matter.
You're not guilty until proven innocent in this
country, even though that is kind of the
way it works. We're supposed to pretend otherwise.
The fact that he looks like something you
might not like does not change the reality
that whatever it is, even if he is
that, they're supposed to present a warrant when
going into somebody's home,
especially American citizens.
Guys, we're there. Okay? We're there. We're not
coming to this. We're there. It's happening. And
it's important that we acknowledge that.
So couple of the points that I think
are important to see.
Here's Laura Loomer. And we already showed you
one recently about, which one was that?
It was another example like this where they
were calling the person, you know, an illegal
oh, it was the person running for office.
He was a Somalian, I guess.
Or or rather, you know,
he's born in, you know, heritage, but he's
an American citizen.
Jack Posobiec and the rest were like, he's
not really an American. Well, he was. He
actually is a born here American. They don't
care about that, though.
That's very alarming to me. That's where this
is going. Now here's Laura Loomer.
Now this is just her stupidity, her her
lack of due diligence, but it's the same
kind of conversation.
Breaking, the manager stabbed nearly a dozen people,
innocent people. And let's be clear, the guy
who did this deserves to go to jail.
It's horrifying. He stabbed a bunch of people.
That's up to the the point is how
it's being dealt, how they're framing it for
their own disgusting narrative.
She's saying, stab nearly a dozen people innocent
people inside of Walmart in Michigan, which then
it says it's being described
by witnesses
as a foreign guy. Well, she this is
her first post. Sorry. She started that. Here's
what she pointed out. So this Daily Mail
says mass stabbings inside of Walmart.
Okay.
Clearly, she had already looked at something or
got something. Or because if she hadn't even
done that and her stating this just speaks
to my point, but something tells me she
already kinda thought she was right, and she
was trying to frame it this way to
make it seem like she guessed correctly. But
she says, what are the odds that the
person who went on a stabbing rampage in
Michigan today was a Muslim immigrant?
Think about making that statement if you actually
have no indication.
God, the stupidity of that is insane to
me. The racism, the bigotry is insane. But
she goes, Michigan has been invaded.
Deport them all. Right. Because it's totally okay
to just say deport all Muslims because of
a guy that might have stabbed somebody might
be.
I mean, my god, guys. These people are
vile. It's everywhere. But here's the crazy part.
This person literally
a Facebook comment who probably somebody sent her
the screenshot of simply goes a foreign guy
just lost it on random people.
She
goes, breaking.
Breaking. The man who just stabbed, you know,
he doesn't pee innocent people inside of a
Walmart is being described by witnesses,
not one comment on a Facebook post someone
sent your screenshot up, but witnesses as a
foreign guy.
Sadly, Michigan has been destroyed by Islamic invaders
who have ruined
majority of American European cities in Michigan.
Europe majority of European cities
in Michigan
that have now been ruined what?
Has been destroyed by Islamic invaders who have
ruined majority
European cities in Michigan.
That's okay. We'll just leave that alone and
go forward. That have now been ruined by
work women in burkas and stench
of stench of shawarma.
God. She's disgusting.
Okay.
The idea, first of all, that you're gonna
care about Islamic invaders here, but then totally
ignore the fact that your Trump government is
blindly supporting the most obvious embodiment of the
thing you claim you're fighting, which is Al
Qaeda
and what's happening in Syria, but that's okay.
Or Saudi Arabia, we'll work with that. But,
you know, she'll give lip service to why
they're bad things, but then completely support the
team that supports them, that funds them, Israel,
United States, because she's a fraud. My point
though is about what you're saying about this
person, who guess what, if you have already
sensed where it's going,
he is an American citizen. The man is
a citizen of The United States. And here's
Loomer using a random Facebook comment that she
likely blindly used without due diligence to perpetuate
her bigoted and incorrect assumption and call to
deport all Muslims, call out these assumeers and
propagandists.
Here she is going further.
Our country has been invaded
by so many people who aren't white
that CNN no longer knows what an actual
white person looks like. Now look, we can
all acknowledge CNN and Fox News in their
own slanted ways are cartoons.
In this case,
saying
possibly white of a person that's clearly not.
That's just stupid. Right? But we've seen that
say but that's playing into the left right
woke versus woke right kinda stupid dynamic. I
don't ever think I mean, whether they believe
it or not,
the value of that, like, the fighting for
woke pronouns. Guys, you're being played. Okay? These
things matter in certain ways. But do you
really think that that's about the I mean,
moving moving beyond the minutia of the stupidity
of all of it. The point is, clearly,
he's not. But for her to then piggyback
that and say, the country's been invaded by
so many non white people, so now you're
drawing the line on white versus everything else?
Like, did she even think that through? Because
that's in that's that's a beyond the pale
for her.
That CNN no longer knows what an actual
white person looks like.
Wow.
Sorry. I'm sorry. I just didn't say. This
is crazy. Oh, I didn't mean to do
that. I'm sorry. The point was, clearly, for
the podcast, I just saw somebody posted a
really gross picture of her down below. Not
important.
Is that this is showing you what they're
really driving. Now whether this is because she's
being driven, paid, influenced to drive division down
racial lines for an obvious science agenda, or
it's because she's gross, maybe both.
It's right in front of you.
She's like, I can't believe how many retards,
excuse me, after she wrote online,
don't understand that you don't have to be
born Arab to be a jihadi.
So here's her trying to do some kind
of care you know, sweep up, some kind
of rapping of, well, I wasn't you're wrong.
I wasn't saying the point. No. You clearly
went after the person as an American citizen
claiming he was a Muslim, but he doesn't
appear to be as a US citizen. Even
if he was, the point is that you
made it into be some kind of an
illegal action. The point,
you weren't talking about Arabs or jihadis. You
were talking about Muslims. But the fact is
even here, she's conflating them all as the
same thing because she's a child.
It's absolutely mind blowing to me where these
people are. And it's the same thing you're
happening you can see in other examples.
People on the other side that do the
same thing about all Jewish people. These are
people that are either in uninformed
or or just disgusting in my opinion.
Here is the image of the guy.
This person says Walmart stabbing suspect. Name still
withheld.
You know what that means. But it wasn't
though. And before this, as even I reported
when I read I think it was I
think I talked about it in a different
show. It was already out there.
His name is not being withheld He's been
identified as Bradford James Guile
Sure sounds like a Muslim, but who knows,
right? Anybody can practice any religion It just
shows you what what she was doing
is not only incorrect, not only completely, you
know, assumptive,
self serving, it's also just gross.
His name was released the the the morning
it happened, or rather this morning, which would
have been the twenty seventh. He's a citizen
of The United States and a resident of
Sheboygan.
Careful with misinformation, they write. It is standard
procedure to withhold information while the investigation kicks
off. This has nothing to do with illegal
immigration. He has prior records of substance violation
and assault. He's just a guy struggling and
maybe a murder per you know, maybe he's
a clearly, is a murderer. My point is
maybe he's gotten some mental issue. Maybe he's
spinning out on anti suppressants.
No way is that meant to justify it.
He should go to jail.
Point stands.
Loomer, in fact, there's so big people out
there trying to make you think that somehow
you're not American if you're not American enough
or the right color or born in the
right place. They are the ones destroying this
country in very selective ways.
So overlapping this with the point oh, and
I I was gonna play that one more
time, actually. Hold on.
Don't have it in here. Just because if
you haven't seen this, I think it's important
to at least see one of the examples
where Trump is saying this, and I like
to overlap it with what judge Napolitano said
just because it's important. And he he has,
you know, he's got standing. People respect what
he has to say, and you should. Here's
what he had to say. Some respects. It's
just as bad now, the authoritarianism,
that is coming, Gerald. I am really, really
fearful for the president of The United States
Of America to suggest as he did on
Air Force One on Sunday night
that American citizens could be deported
For his press secretary to say, we're looking
into,
a way to see if this is legal.
We don't know if it's legal or not.
A is terrifying.
B betrays such a profound ignorance of first
principles to which he is sworn. He is
sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution
and to enforce,
federal law. You mentioned that you're open to
deporting,
individuals that aren't foreign aliens but are criminals
to El Salvador. Does that in does that
include potentially US citizens fully naturalized in Ukraine?
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happened
to be 90 years old, and if,
if they rape
87 year old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn,
yeah. Yeah. That includes them. What? Do you
think there's special category of person? They're as
bad as anybody that comes in. We have
bad ones too. Profoundly un American, utterly unconstitutional,
and I am sorry to say
is coming.
Now in, I think,
at least three different interviews, maybe it was
two. Trump said clearly
naturalized, but homegrown, because I like to call
it homegrown.
So let's not pretend like he's not talking
about anybody,
including you, chief Republican Trump supporter born in
The United States, if you do the wrong
thing. That's already happened, actually. There's been two
examples of Trump supporters who got caught up
in all this because they were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. It's it's
getting
it's well beyond alarming at this point. So
let's talk about Epstein, how in all the
in these all these things kinda maneuver together
if you understand how these things fit together.
This is an this one's important to continue
to follow-up on just because I think they're
drowning in a very interesting sort of,
like, clearly, Epstein, it connects to many things.
Israel, obviously. Intelligence, obviously. Right? And and the
the black male kind of sexual manipulation network.
I mean, these are big things. But what's
interesting about it is that at the time
when all of the rest is happening, right,
with the foreign policy, with the larger kind
of global things that are taking place, it's
interesting that that becomes, like, this major spit
out moment.
You know, maybe it's because that it's built
I mean, because largely, republicans were, you know,
driven to focus on it because it clearly,
it matters. And this they didn't think that
it would be that his whole statement, he
can shoot somebody in the middle time square,
they'll still support him. I guess not. Right?
Clearly, there's a line. Right? My point though
is it's interesting that that became the thing,
and I just feel like it's sort of
a an anomaly that it just tripped them
up and, like, if if they have just
ignored it. Like, you know what somebody said
to me once,
months ago when this was first starting? All
we had to do was be like, we're
you know, get well, we need six months.
You know? Like, even though they wouldn't have
made them happy to say, like, we will
release it, but give us six months to
go through. They could've kicked that down to
the
year. And even even then, it would've, at
some point, had to happen. But who knows
what else would've happened and the distraction by
then. But instead, he went right to it's
fake. You're lying. You know? And I we're
gonna go through it. It's just weird. And
I think it says a lot. I can't
say exactly what, but it's clearly there's something
behind the story, and that's what everybody is
sensing. Now you you could you could argue
it's because Trump is guilty of everything that
people insinuate,
but it could also just be that he's
worried how the evidence, even if he's not
guilty of any crimes, evidence being his name
on the flight logs, whatever else, but maybe
he didn't go to the island, but that
that will be used against him, which is
certainly possible, and you should consider that. That's
kind of the narrative you get from the
Infowars side of it where, you know, he's
being played by the Democrats or at the
very least that that's how he thinks might
be happening. And so that's why he's doing
this. And it's like,
it's not invalid
other than the fact that they're going every
which way they can to make up stories
that just make it seem like he's completely
on he's a cry he's a criminal regardless
of the Epstein files. Let's be honest
about that. Bomb, assassination of Soleimani, the many
different illegal wars, the, you know, the same
things every other president, Biden and before, you
could point out. But Donald Trump says his
name may have been planted in the Epstein
files.
Slight deviation. Right? It's funny. It just continues
to be stated. The fact that he keeps
saying these things, it it just nope. It's
the, you know, she doth broats excuse me,
doth protest too much kind of a point.
Right? Meaning,
it's obvious that you're you know, instead of
just saying it, you're like, if I'm not
there, I'm not there, I'm not there. You
start to go, he's probably there. Right?
It says on Monday, president Trump told the
reporters that his name may have been planted
in the Epstein files. You know, but the
same files that were fake a second ago,
but now exist, but are but see, that's
the argument. You go, well, he didn't mean
fakes entirely. He meant that they're manipulated fake.
But that's not true, though. He called it
all a hoax, and he said it more
than once, the whole thing. He can't keep
putting words in his mouth, but that's what
the Jones of the world keep doing.
It says,
planted in the Epstein files by former attorney
general Merrick Garland or former FBI director James
Comey. So which one is it? Maybe maybe
both, maybe one, maybe the other, maybe Obama.
So the point is we have nothing to
back this up. It's not evidence, but we
just think that might happen. Okay. Well, that's
not what you're showing people.
The idea that it may have happened, you
could know because you can look at the
files. Right? You can look. So the fact
that you keep going, it could have been
that. It could have been this. Maybe my
name was planted, but it's a hoax.
It feels very dishonest.
The president responded in part, well, I haven't
been overly interested in it. It's also a
lie. It's a hoax, he says. That's been
built up by those way beyond proportion.
Those files were run by the worst scum
on Earth.
You mean the people you support in Syria?
You mean the kill people killing kids in
in in Israel? No. No. He means by
Comey, by Garland, by Biden.
Well, I agree. There are some pretty bad
people, but the worst scum on earth. I
mean, think about the people that we're talking
about in the world today. Think about the
genocide. Think about the all kind of people
beheading children and executing people on the ground.
It's just fine. My point is the hyperbolic
nature when he wants the, you know, he's
extreme
worst people on the planet had access to
this. And that becomes the kind of floating
narrative. They were run by Colby. They were
run by Garland. They were run by Biden.
Those files were run for four years by
those people run by them.
He's just conflating all these things. Now people
are gonna, you know, you know what he's
trying to do right there. Well, okay. Well,
you had those files before this or rather
just the access to this information clearly, which
same thing. Why didn't you show us then?
Probably because your name was in there, even
if it was because you were on the
flight logs, the same point. So you chose
to keep it secret.
You can't keep throwing it at the Democrats
only, guys. It's clearly both sides in this.
Says this whole thing is a hoax. You
see, you can't keep saying the whole thing
is a hoax and then have other people
tell you you mean he just means the
part Democrats added.
It's not what he said right there. The
whole thing is a hoax. Direct quote from
Donald Trump. They ran the files. I was
running against somebody that ran the files.
If they had something, they would have released
it. Well, that's also an assumption because maybe
they're on the list too, or maybe you're
all on the same team. It's a stupid
argument. The reality is you said it's all
a hoax, and now you're talking about real
information being released. How in the same sentence.
He continued, now they can easily put something
in the files that's phony.
Now they can?
What do you mean what do you mean?
So you're talking about your own team now?
He says, as an example, Christopher Steele wrote
a book. We call that the fake news
dossier. The whole thing was a fake. Well,
that's not actually true. Plenty of parts of
it were actually true, but the the insinuation,
the the narrative built was a complete fraud.
He says the whole thing was a fake.
They could put things in the file that
was a fake. Those files are run by
sick sick people. That is like desperate, desperate,
desperate, desperate.
You don't need to do all of that.
That's you know, you're giving too many details.
You're going to know and by the way,
what you're saying here con can contradict what
you've said before.
Because, well, I'm allowed to give her a
part. Oh, in regard to Maxine, just like
Maxwell.
I'm allowed to give her a pardon. Here's
what he says. But nobody's approached me with
it. Nobody's asked me about it.
Does anybody believe that? He said the same
thing about Epstein, who? I don't know. No
one's even told me. He lied about that.
Hell, I was never briefed on it. He
lied about that. Guys, this is one after
another. What the hell? How do we not
call this out?
And he says,
nobody's asked me about it. That's ridiculous. Trump
told reporters when asked about the possibilities. He
says, it's in the news about that that,
that aspect of it, but right now, it
would be inappropriate to talk about. He just
said nobody's asked you about it. Are you
actually gonna pretend that as the DOJ is
discussing her deal, that they're not gonna ask
you about whether pardons are on the table?
That's just stupid. Everyone knows that's being discussed.
So, yes, they asked him. He's trying to
present himself as not even involved for a
very obvious reason, in my opinion.
This one I had to point
out. Here's Alex Jones saying Jeffrey Epstein believed
Donald Trump was the rat that snitched on
him
and first tipped off law enforcement to his
criminal and pedophilic activities.
Now
that seems like a stretch to me, but
the idea is it's a claim of what
he believed. Okay.
I I I don't it's kind of difficult
to to be able to prove today what
Epstein believed.
You know, there's a reason for that. Then
he says, so using that
unverified point. So if Epstein had Trump blackmailed
with their Mossad honeypot, but now he's trying
to lean into because he knows where this
is going and is trying to pretend like
he's on this side,
why would Trump drop a dime on himself?
Wow. Okay. I simply said, so you're using
an unverified claim of a belief of a
sexual predator
compared to an unverified
hypothetical
in order to insinuate that Trump is innocent?
You're doing great work, bud. Keep it up.
Here he says, on the twenty fifth,
the globalist have jumped the shark. Now realize,
now he's saying that the difference is twenty
fifth. He says, this is their strategy of
endlessly calling for the release of the files
and making that the key issue in the
country
instead of the incredible economic boom, which not
really happening. Secure border, not. And ending the
wars, not actually happen. I mean, are you
joking?
Are you trying to embarrass yourself? Ending what
wars? The ones you keep telling us are
done that are absolutely exploding? The idea here
is the strategy of calling for the files,
that was the Trump administration.
You guys are trying to rewrite history now,
and it's embarrassing.
This is weird.
Here he is on the twenty fifth going,
Clinton is running scared.
They already had this opportunity, guys. They Trump
was clear. No. We're not gonna go after
them. They're good people. That's what he said.
I this is just getting pathetic. It's just
like this is people trying to deviate this
into something to stop you from seeing what's
happening.
This was the, I guess, the debate which
people said with them just kind of agreeing
on most of them and and Nick Fuentes.
Here's what justice truth justice says. Elon Musk
tagging him. What happened to Alex Jones account?
Ever since he started exposing the crimes of
the Mossad, which is really not happening at
all, Israel intelligence, IDF, and Netanyahu, he's not
doing any of those things as far as
I'm concerned. I don't watch everything he does.
But, guys, look at the work. Look at
the support.
On top of everything, Trump is and Biden
both blindly still support Israel, and he supports
them. But the reality is no way is
that happening. His account is tanked seriously.
Well, maybe it's because everyone's starting to see
the clown that he is. Everyone's starting to
see the
clapping seal that just screams whatever the narrative
is or tries to give you feigned examples
to give you you know, I think people
are starting to see this stuff. Look at
the comments of the zone support base. But
I can't know that for sure. That's my
opinion. The reality is for you to now
start to pretend or insinuate that his account
is being suppressed because he's clearly doing lip
service for the agenda of Zionism while feigning
this would not support,
like, the Mossad blackmail network. He's not fighting
against the real things that are involved with
this. That's insane to me. He has 4,400,000
followers and used to get millions of views.
Now he gets a 182.
Okay. Maybe.
But it's way more than that now. Okay.
So my point
is the same. It's certainly possible. Let's put
it like this, to be objective,
he's giving the smallest amount in the direction.
Even saying the Mossad Network. Okay. Maybe that's
enough to trip up the censorship platform that
he told you was a free speech platform.
Maybe.
You're the one that he still tells you
was saving free speech. Maybe that's right. Maybe
they are censoring because he said Mossad. I
would be I I could wrap my mind
around that, but I think it's a contradiction
right there. Still support the free speech platform.
We love saving the world. But they may
be censoring me because I'm telling the truth.
It's typical Israeli type propaganda as far as
I'm concerned. The reality though is this does
happen. You see it with many platforms that
have large followings or any number of followings
that never really get a certain percentage of
that on certain topics.
I just think this is ridiculous. I said,
give me a break. He is still obviously
supporting Zion's agenda and plays team for politics
regardless of the lip service he gives to
manipulate some into thinking otherwise. This is my
opinion. He is currently trying to rebrand into
what most honest media was saying, but were
I should've said were were saying before
the election.
Remember that? That they all told us for
black pill, purity test.
Look at them suddenly shifting into that position.
Funny how that works.
Here's Kat Turd saying, we're winning, and we're
winning big time.
Be happy.
I simply say, I think this is that's
what's going on. I actually said Bennet Johnson
the same thing about something else, and I
just said, you're the living embodiment of this
meme. That's what this is what they represent
to me.
Now Maxwell
was granted a limited immunity before she even
met behind the scenes with the DOJ, Trump's
DOJ.
Went to some secret meeting, came back with
a box of materials. Nobody knows what's going
on. That was the first part.
Why that's okay with anybody's beyond me. That
means anything she discussed in that meeting, she
has immunity to. That's what they listed out.
That's the reality.
So if she comes in there and tells
you everything she ever did, now she's got
immunity right there. But the point is, that's
the first step about just a limited to
get what she had to say. But
well, and well, and set oh, I'll get
to a second. They claim she spoke about
hundreds of people, but nothing has happened.
Nothing.
And now we're in this back and forth
about
testifying for the Congress.
Okay. Well, then what the hell just happened
between here and the DOJ with multiple meetings?
There,
you know what? I think I think there's
already something going on here, The secret meeting
and now things are shifting. You know, I
think that this was about some either you
can make it about Trump and his deal
to keep his name out of all this,
to give her to I you know, I
I get the sense that it's gonna be
something where she is pardoned or given immunity,
and then she gets turned into the victim,
which Newsmax already tried to do. That's where
I get sense. But, of course, we could
be wrong. Here,
this is on the July 25. Just letting
requests a pardon after the meeting with Trump.
Now after that,
the house panel had rejected the immunity request
by at by by of Maxwell. Here's what
it said. A republican led congressional committee
rejected on Tuesday. This was on the '20,
the thirtieth. Excuse me. Or, technically, it would
have been before that what date the
twenty seventh, twenty eight. It says, on Tuesday,
reque a request by a longtime associate of
the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for
immunity from future prosecution
as a condition for testifying to the panel
in the midst of a political storm surrounding
president Trump. She has been subpoenaed to testify
privately.
Why?
Well, you I think we all know why.
So either way, it's what we're gonna get
is what they want to show you took
place.
With something like this, there's no reason. I
mean, the ideas, you know, they're gonna claim
because they're she's gonna divulge information about individuals,
you know, which is not, you know, victims.
It's not an invalid point, But the reality
of this and the way it's already gone,
the way the Epstein story from the get
go was exposed, the lie about his suicide,
the reality of what went down there, and
then being proven to be lies when they
showed you the video which didn't exist, when
they showed you I mean, every which way
of this is insane.
And then they find out that they cut
part of the video out. Now they're trying
to patch that up.
And then they got a secret meeting with
her. Then she they're giving her materials. What
does that mean? And who is she now
singing about when they already supposedly got all
of this? And now you're gonna talk about
private meeting or other private testimony? I mean,
this is what what the American people want.
We want this to be I mean, this
what this screams is the US government is
covering something up, which is what they usually
do.
Miss Maxwell, quote, cannot risk further criminal exposure
in a politically charged environment without formal immunity.
That's the lawyer.
Maxwell's lawyer said this to Comer.
In an emailed statement, a committee spokesperson said
the oversight committee will respond to miss Maxwell's
attorney soon, but it will not consider granting
congressional immunity for her testimony. Now, that's not
just within saying that publicly is not the
same as them not doing that.
They'll they'll respond to her soon and they're
just saying we're not considering that. Well, that
sometimes turns out to be the opposite. I'm
not running. Turns out to be I'm running
for the president. You know, that's kind of
what sometimes happens anyway. My thing is that
I'm wondering why they're stating that,
you know, or why there's you know, there's
everything about this seems contrived. I'll put it
that way. Maxwell
was asking the US Supreme Court to overturn
her conviction. Trump has said he would not
was not considering a presidential pardon for Maxwell.
But then later, as we just showed you,
said that I wasn't even asked about it.
Okay. Well, that seems a little con conflict
conflicting.
Here and this is from the first. Now
this is where it from there, that mo
you most probably already know about up to
that point. Now as of today,
Maxwell is quietly moved, even according to New
York Post,
to a cushy new club fed prison
as she pushes for deal to tell all
or whatever she's told to tell on Epstein.
It says notorious sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell, has
quietly been moved to a cushy Texas prison
camp known as Club Fed as she tries
to hash out a deal to divulge her
sorted secrets about late pedophile ex Jeffrey Epstein.
And the the BOP, the per the Bureau
of Prisons will mention that in a second.
No reason was given for the move,
but it comes days after she met deputy
attorney general Todd Blanche twice while trying to
seek immunity.
And the deal was spill her secrets about
Epstein.
Now she's currently serving point 20 or whatever
that reduced sentence was years. So the reality
is why wouldn't she have already been screaming
about things she had to tell about people
that want to, you know, she could put
in jail
right away.
The only time this I've got all this
new information came up is when Donald Trump
opened his mouth and said it was all
a hoax, which opened the door for her
appeal.
This feels like a manipulation. And now we're
into the door opening the door to them
being able to play a card with the
Trump administration, which we already see where that's
going. He's already been caught lying many times.
And, again, my perspective is that it's all
of the government or a large part of
it. So
we're seeing this being, you know, played out
where it's gonna end up in a situation
where one prediction, we're not gonna get anything.
We're not gonna get any information. And if
we do, it's gonna be cultivated.
And then ultimately, she's gonna get some kind
of a deal. Now maybe that is her
getting sent to this cushy prison
for us for a little bit more time
until we stop paying attention and then let
her out, something like that. Hard to tell.
Because giving her immunity, right, would be difficult
right now.
Maxwell is supposed to be locked up until
2037.
Yet inmates, quote, typically go to a camp
that she just went to if you have
just a couple years left. So it was
an indication they moved her there because she's
getting some kind of a deal.
But it says, but if someone is cooperating
witness, they can request lower security level.
Her ex her unexpected move from the Federal
Correctional Institution Tallahassee was handled directly
by the bureau. I wasn't again the b
the Bureau of Prisons, the BOP.
It instead of what usually happens, which is
US marshals,
according to New York Sun, which said it
included a brief stopover in FCI Oakdale in
Louisiana.
Why?
Maybe nothing. Maybe maybe it's just they had
other business. But the weirdness of this, the
prison system is far more, I think, in
line with what Donald Trump wants to carry
out. And, like, the US marshals aren't necessarily
gonna do whatever the executive branch wants, guys.
I feel like that's a very weird thing
to do, to take the bureau of prisons
to deliver her and have a weird stop
off of everything that's already happened. And now
she's in a lower security prison. She's a
sex trafficker who's been counted guilty of that,
who worked with Epstein. Is this what Republicans
would say is winning?
No reason was given for the unexpected move.
So or, her lawyer also declined to elaborate,
simply saying, we can confirm that she was
moved, but we have no comment. That clearly
speaks something's going on. That's not how you
respond when there's just no deal. I mean,
he's already what said before. Yeah. We're you
know, we're working on this. We don't know
yet. Him saying we moved no comment. To
me, there's something going on.
But I think we all get that. I
mean, it's pretty obvious something shifting
here. Now raw news alerts, and this is
public. Here's the actual article.
Congress has postponed
its highly anticipated interview with Epstein associate Maxwell,
which was originally scheduled for August 11.
It's August 1.
So we have ten days and they postpone
it.
August 11 at this time, it's been indefinitely
postponed
with no due date announced.
Okay. Okay. So she gets sent to a
nice prison. It's cushy
limited time
and nothing is to come out. Seems to
work for everybody.
Am I wrong?
Now, I'm not saying I know. I'm saying
clearly, if you look at that, that seems
to work out for everybody. They get what
they want. She gets what she wants.
Comer says he will postpone just lay Maxwell
testimony. So So we'll have to wait and
see what happens. Clearly,
this is weird. And it says, but he
agreed to delay the interview until after the
Supreme Court rules on her appeal,
or that's what they're saying. So rules now
her point was that she wants to be
given immunity
before this in order to testify. They're saying
we're not gonna let that happen until you
the court rules on the appeal. Now the
appeal, I think it's gonna include the statements
from Trump that is it's a hoax. So
how can you charge me with trafficking if
you're claiming it's not real?
And it says, which claims are that her
2021 sex trafficking conviction was barred by Epstein's
earlier plea deal, that it's not likely to
happen before the court begins its annual term
in October.
I'm willing to bet you that this either
ends up like this where it drifts into
the background or there's something secret that goes
on around it.
My general point, I think most people are
saying right now left and right and aware
of the illusion that we're never going to
see the reality of this.
On the twenty fifth, Alex Jones posted this
breaking. Top Trump lawyer, Todd Blanche, reports that
Ghislaine Maxwell saying like a Canary answering hundreds
of questions of hundreds of different people.
Okay. What happened?
Maybe it'll happen tomorrow. Maybe it'll happen the
next day, but when it inevitably
doesn't happen, if that's the case, let's remember
that. Remember the cheerleading for one thing, and
remember that the people involved with claiming to
go after sex trafficking people or, you know,
criminals
aren't doing anything about it.
Trump has opened the floodgates. Democrats' worst nightmare
is about to come true. Just so funny.
So this is blankly saying bookmarking this for
which, like, Maxwell gets pardoned by Trump and
there's no mass arrest of Democrats. Now even
if she gets doesn't get pardoned,
the idea of the mass arrest of Democrats
or any of the people they ever claimed,
we all see by now that's not happening.
Not Fauci, not Gaetz, not Biden. Whatever you
think about it, the promises were there.
Pedro Gonzalez says, July 16, Trump insults this
base for believing the Epstein files. Called them
weaklings,
called them, what else was it? Cowards, I
think. July 23,
Confirmed DOJ briefed Trump that his name appears
in the files.
Right? So I think that right there is
when you saw this weird deviation where suddenly
he's like, oh, no. My name is listed
all over this thing. Well, now I have
to call it a hoax.
Twenty fifth. Trump Trump denies being,
being told his name appears in the files.
'28. July 28, Trump says, okay. My name's
in there, but it was planted.
And and let's say twenty fourth, he was
like, it's a hoax. It's a hoax. And
still to this day. He says, this is
so funny. And right wing media just runs
with it. Yeah. It's a Democrat hoax. Never
existed. Wait. We're getting reports now from the
White House that it's the files do exist,
but Trump's name isn't in there. Okay. We're
hearing now that it's in there, but Obama
did it. Alright. Now we've got official confirmation
that only weaklings would ever consider discussing the
existence of the nonexistent files. This is this
is so stupid, and we all see it.
That's why you have to the people like
the Joneses stand out so much, guys. You're
not stupid.
You can see this is wrong. Some and,
again, it could just be that Trump doesn't
want the the association, but it's still dishonest,
and they're still covering for him. It's embarrassing.
An interesting point the seven seas shared.
It, oh, well, I I let's say I
grabbed the wrong one. Seven seas also posted
this. Here's his account right here.
Richard Willett from iconic network shared this saying
great work from seven seas. The distance between
Epstein's private island,
And and and I say Angoule Angoulea
thirteen minutes approximately
which is then a short twenty to twenty
five minute ferry to Saint Martin where Donald
Trump owns a chateau now that doesn't prove
anything other than these calls But it says
Saint Martin has two airports, one in the
Dutch side and another in the French. Now
those reports,
right, of the air of flight logs that
he claims he never went to the island,
which maybe that's the case. Well, he went
somewhere. Right? And so if that was to
this airport this place, where he's thirteen minutes
away, maybe that's what happened. It's a valid
point to consider that maybe there's another way
this happened. We but don't let that be
proof. It's just another data point.
David Ike
points out another another extension of all this.
By the way, on a quick side note,
the whole thing with the daily beast and
then, like, censoring their own post when they're
simply pointing to the reality of how he
met Melania through the Epstein kind of overlapping
associations.
It's a very real point, and and it's
ridiculous that they were pressured by Melania's team
to apparently take their post down. Very weird
to me. Bloomberg post the FBI redacted
Donald Trump's name
as well as the names of other prominent
public figures from the Epstein files under privacy
exemptions.
As David Icke writes, I have lived a
long time,
but this has to be one of the
most blatant cover ups played out in the
public that I've ever seen.
Just crazy. I got this late in the
prep for the show, but I, you know,
I can maybe go through this in a
future show, but I find it really interesting.
They oh, that was oh, it is longer.
I thought it was kinda short. The idea
I'll just read this. The bureaus FOIA team
tasked with conducting a final review of the
records blocked out the names
before higher ups said last month that releasing
the documents would not be appropriate or warranted.
They have been covering their association with this
from the very beginning, guys.
Raw story reports, woah, accusation that Mike Johnson
complicit in the Epstein cover up, shocks conservatives.
This is interesting. This is basically just the
like, I I see this as the Trump
side of this trying to go I mean,
I think he even said this in here.
Yeah. It says the Epstein files reportedly include
the names of president Trump
earlier this week.
Where was it? I'll just read it from
the beginning. I I thought I had it
highlighted. It says, oh, it was Bill Bill
Crystal that said this. The bulwark's Bill Kristol
wrote Thursday that house house house speaker, excuse
me, Mike Johnson
and house Republicans were complicit in an Orwellian
cover up to protect protect powerful people involved
in the Epstein scandal. Chrystal quoted Johnson telling
CNN Jake Tapper, I want everything to come
out of the Epstein evils. I'm pushing aggressively
for the full release of everything as possible.
And by the way, so is the president.
We're using every mechanism within our power to
do that and to do it as quickly
as possible.
He says, and yet, Crystal wrote, Johnson panicked
and recessed the house in order to avoid
a floor vote. He did. Massey called him
out. What I find interesting is the effort
to make it not about Trump, but kind
of pivot to Johnson,
which by the way is probably just as
likely to be involved in all of this.
I I wouldn't doubt any of them, but
I find it interesting. Like, this starts to
feel like damage control. Right? Let's make Johnson
the scapegoat. Let's shift it to him and
hope that that takes the brunt of it.
But here's Thomas Massey also calling out Mike
Johnson.
In in another post where the Mike Johnson
does a whole clip here basically claiming Thomas
Massey's effort to vote on this was a
manipulation.
Massey just does a whole thread breaking down
exactly why he's lying about it. And he
goes, Johnson is making false claims about my
discharge petition that seeks to force a house
vote on the full release of the Epstein
Epstein files. And he just goes through it
and breaks it all down. Johnson lies about
it in every possible way and then basically
postpones the vote till October, I think, or
sep no. September.
But I think it's September. The point is
not a long time from now.
Right before that was gonna happen. And it
you can go through it. He bay it
just goes through the the the nuance kind
of minutiae of it where he claims that,
you know, this is it's gonna I mean,
I don't wanna read through it. The point
is you can read it. It's just about
the specific statute to different points of where,
you know, he claims that what they do
this, it's gonna make it last longer. He's
lying. And and the point is what Johnson
is doing is in order to keep it
from coming out and what Massey's trying to
do is to get this to happen. At
least that's what it appears to me if
you look at the facts.
Here's an interesting overlap.
Alternette pointed this out. Trump Bakker, who pledged
to, quote, fight against child trafficking, arrested on
similar charges. Now this doesn't have to mean
anything other than this one person.
Right? That it never should it be that
you go, that means all MAGA are pedophiles.
It's just what a lot of people would
do about Democrats or vice versa. Don't be
that stupid. Be objective. Be, you know, honest
with yourself. But what's interesting is on both
sides of the paradigm, you can find a
lot of this. People that wanna get involved
with movements, you know, who so they can
give themselves the veneer of of honesty. You
know, it's the same reason you get people
like the Tates or others that try to
align themselves with Tucker and Candace Owens. Look.
We're we're honest peep they're not. They're horrible
people. And both Tucker and Candace, let them
just lie to you all day long, and
you can easily prove it for yourself. They're
terrible people. Like, they're like the Jersey Shore
example of, like, the existing of this field.
It's terrible. The worst of the worst. The
point, though, is that you could see example
here of a person who tried to align
himself with the we're fighting human trafficking side
and then got caught with child pornography on
his computer.
Interesting to think about in a, you know,
a an example, a microcosm of a larger
issue, not of average people in the movement,
but of people in power who gravitate towards
them to cover who they are. I don't
know. Like a Karp teal kind of overlap
where they were libertarians and they're really not.
But it says a passionate supporter of Trump
who was married to a prominent republican operative
in Wisconsin and publicly stated in 2024 that
he was casting his vote to combat child
trafficking is now facing 10 counts of possession
of child pornography, of images of exploited
children. Now what's crazy, he says
he said, I'm voting to fight against this
human trafficking.
More than fifteen years prior to that post
in 02/2019,
Door County investigators examined his laptop after he
admitted to downloading illegal images involving children. So
he admitted to this. But for reasons that
remain unexplained,
the case was never sent to the district
attorney's office. There's see, there's so much of
this going on, guys. For some reason, now
it's happening. Maybe driven because of Democrats. Doesn't
change the fact that he's admitted to being
guilty, admitted to doing that. And he's connected
to a high level Republican. I think it's
important to see how much of this is
probably going on.
Now,
interesting overlap to the
propaganda, like so remember, we talked about this
right away, and I will credit Adam Cochran,
who's the first person I saw this from.
And as far as I could tell, like,
well before anybody, July 7, he posted this.
Now remember, if you watch this excuse me.
He just nailed the I mean, every single
point he makes in this is outstanding,
and it's very clear. And you can watch
the whole video for yourself. We included it
when we did this show, which is right
here. We went through it mostly piece by
piece, not the whole video, but his post,
and then showed some parts of the video.
And what's crazy
is things that they literally show you in
this video explicitly prove they lied before,
which is just clumsy or I don't know.
It may be an accident. They cut pieces
out of the video. My point though is
one of the things they show you is
one of these random people of the remember
that orange thing that slips in and out
of the scene and these different examples
or the cut video, all this different stuff.
Well, guess what? CBS breaking news
investigation of Jeffrey Epstein jail video reveals new
discrepancies.
Oh, this is just funny, by the way.
So I just thought that was hilarious.
Spot the Epstein dossier.
But, you know, it's so funny. If you
can't laugh, like, if it was Biden, I
would laugh the same way. It's just, like,
it's funny that it's, like, you know, the
the whole hair over thing is just hilarious.
And people just, you know, so quick to
defend their personal side. Biden and Trump, they're
both stupid. Let's laugh at them all. But
the funny thing is they're trying to push
this idea now.
News investigation of Jeffrey Epstein jail video reveals
new discrepancies, and they literally go over these
new discrepancies. This is July 29.
And what are they highlighting?
The random orange anomaly that comes out of
the scene. All the different things that we
were talking rather that Cochrane was talking about,
that we covered after he posted it. I'm
simply just highlighting
that just I mean, let's put it this
way. The mainstream media
will happily,
whether they saw it on his post or
not,
grab their work and go, no. Look at
what we found and everyone's never seen it
before because a lot of people have them
because they only see through the lens of
corporate media.
But they don't wanna point to him because
he's doing it, but they they wanna use
it in a truncated way. They don't wanna
give you part of the story and keeps
you down the rabbit hole or I kept
not keeps you from going down the rabbit
hole.
My point though is that's just like the
mainstream alternative media today, which that's the point.
They're the same thing. They have the same
model. They do the same thing. They're just
new and element, you know, new core you
know,
TikTok elements of it, but it's the same
thing. I just thought it's worth pointing out
that people like Cochrane should get, you know,
a lot of credit for doing it, and
they and they've got a lot of reach
on it. It's a great post, but people
like the corporate media will happily jump in
and just take credit for things that have
been out there since July 7 because that's
what they do.
And usually, it's
after it's relevant. Right? Where, you know, this
point, it was good to see it right
when it came out, But now it's being
used to keep you some looking at something
else probably. But we go over in the
show. You can watch for yourself.
Lastly, on the Obama connection to it, you
might have seen this, July 30. Brooke Singman
says, Kash Patel has just randomly found thousands
of sensitive documents related to the origin of
the Trump Russia probe buried in multiple burn
bags in secret room inside the bureau. Sources
familiar told me.
Now, obviously, I'm skeptical.
It's just so you know, my point is,
has anybody seen any of that? Has anybody
gotten any evidence that that actually exists?
It just if if I'm saying it doesn't,
we all I mean, I think most people
know left and right that the Russia gate
thing was a complete manipulation.
But again, there were elements of it that
were based on real things, but it was
a manipulation. It was a hoax. It was
a lie, guys. That's what it was.
And what's funny about it though, is that
they keep now pointing to that
with nobody else going to jail and going
like, this is the thing. Look over there.
But Obama's not going to jail. None of
them are. Call me. Are they being arrested?
Are they being in well, you could argue
they're being investigated, but here's the thing. If
you keep telling us you've got evidence of
crimes, if you keep telling us that they
committed treason,
that's either libel. If you don't know that
for a fact or you're telling us, you
know, for a fact, and yet you're not
arresting anybody. How about Clinton? How about other
Clinton? How about any of the people you've
been claiming all these years? Nope.
Same thing. So I think this,
I'm like, okay. I'm not buying that. And,
you know, me, I wouldn't buy it regardless
until I saw some facts because anybody who
just takes at face value a government claim
deserves to be manipulated.
Reality, guys,
I think that is a complete look over
there kinda thing just like this.
Tim Pool. Holy f.
This is massive, he says July 31. Hillary
and Obama admin conspired to undermine and sabotage
the US government. Yeah. That's old news, bud.
Everyone everywhere knows about this. Doesn't mean it's
not important. They should go to jail. I
agree.
But you just keep pointing to this as
if that's I mean, it's it's almost it's
all it's too conspicuous.
Oh my god. The thing that we all
know, don't look over there, but, oh my
god, this is so crazy.
And the patriot voice just goes, and nothing
will be done about it because he sees
it.
And Tim Pool will go, oh my god.
Look at the next thing. We are told
to point that because that's what they seem
to do. I don't know if they know
it or not, but it's pretty obvious what's
happening.
Nick's order comes out and goes, president Trump
posts, it's time to indict Obama,
the traitor for treason.
Okay. As somebody pointed out, well, okay. If
you keep I think it was five times
August. If you keep accusing somebody of treason,
he's been saying this for, what, a month
now? And nothing happens?
Are you then complicit in said treason?
That's what he literally wrote that. But let's
not forget,
Alex Jones says, let's go. Get Obama.
And again, I agree with that, but I
agree with Trump too. They should all go
to jail. But I simply pointed out again
that, you know, Trump has already said publicly
that Obama has immunity because of his case.
He said, Trump, Obama should thank me.
And yet, here we are.
Keeping you keeping you, you know, what's the
right word for you? Just dragging you along
with an air. Go after Obama, get her,
lock her up.
Meanwhile, they're doing they're locking you in their
Panopticon, but let's keep pretending this was happening
just like Jones did the last time.
So
the same thing applies to the Israeli conversation,
rather, the Israeli government conversation.
And this will be the last part we're
gonna get into today, and it's very alarming.
And I again, as usual, there's some tough
stuff to look at, guys, but it's important
that we look at it.
Now in the first section here, it's about
Israel and the control over The United States,
where there's a 100 points every day for
you to point out. But as this one
stands out more than most most, even the
Trump chief Trumpster
calls it The United States Of Israel.
Donald Trump posted, wow. Canada has just announced
that it is backing statehood for Palestine. How
dare they?
That will make it very hard for us
to make a trade deal with them.
I don't think he thought that went through.
I don't think he even thinks about these
things.
The thing is, guys, obviously,
statehood of Palestine is what everybody should be
asking for, even what Israel pretended they wanted
up until thirty seconds ago.
But on top of all of it, regardless
of what you think it is, he's literally
saying, if Canada does not do what Israel
wants, we can't make a deal with them.
Doesn't that seem insane?
And as Daniel McAdams writes, I thought the
tariffs were beat to bring back our manufacturing
base, Not to punish countries who criticize Israel,
America first. But, see, if you're not a
child, you already know what's happening here because
you can look at the precedent. Right? Not
just the narrative from day to day, but
the actions and what's actually happened.
Well, he's currently coercing colleges and they're censoring
people around antisemitism.
Or you like we just saw, he's using
the money around AI stuff to coerce states
and doing what he want. That's what they
do. It's not just Trump. It's just the
way the government operates. He's just a much
more cutthroat element of it.
So,
again, not manufacturing. It's about using it to
force countries to do things, at this case,
for Israel at the expense of Americans.
Daniel also says oh, first, Matt Walsh, rightly.
Again, Matt Walsh from the Daily Wire. He
writes, this is ridiculous.
If a trade deal with Canada is beneficial
to the American people,
regardless of what's the truth or not, the
point is that's what Trump is insinuating. This
is gonna help America. Right? So if that's
the case,
then it should go forward. Right? Regardless of
whether Canada's has us canceled on Palestine, which
has nothing to do with this. The benefit
of the American people should be the guiding
principle.
Yes. Which shows you without a shadow of
a doubt, that's not America first.
How do you misunderstand that? This is Israel
first.
Even if it's America second guys, that's Israel
first.
Daniel McAdams writes, team MAGA is bugging out
of this America last administration.
It really, this is everyone is starting to
see this breakdown As cat turds going, we're
happy and great, and everything's fantastic. It's it's
and Trump's reporting that it's only a small
part of the base that no one's paying
attention to. They're drowning in this right now.
And realize it's not Epstein. It's it's it's
all of it. Because, clearly, the Israel part
is not going away, and Epstein is linked
into that. But, of course, here's what happens
the next day.
Trump hikes tariffs on some can Canadian goods
to 35%
after officials fail to reach trade deal, Or
is it because you already publicly said they
support Palestine?
I'm sure you can work it out for
yourself.
Same thing. And I simply said, at this
point, you either admit the obvious or you
don't care about the people of this country,
guys. I hate to make it a binary
thing, but come on. I mean, it's like
that's like before. It's like there's something deficient
in this. If you can't acknowledge that this
is not what you think was what you
were told, what you cheered on, what you
told us would happen,
then you either don't care about it or
you're lying to yourself. This sentiment applies to
the lie
that we are being sold about tariffs or
the fact that Israel's controlling US policy and
many other points as well.
Daniel McAdams says Trump is betraying his strongest
supporters
and his base for a foreign country, and
he knows it but doesn't care. Here's the
article.
Trump reportedly told a Jewish donor, my people
are starting to hate Israel.
You can clue you it's not hard to
see where his his side is on this,
guys. And, again, I'll always include this. The
wall right? I could have been adding this
for 17 other videos. There's a lot going
on.
But the point is all of these were
preselection,
pre the last election, and every one of
them show he was willing to censor you
for for Israel, that your rights are secondary.
It's obvious now. It was obvious then.
Oh, and don't forget, by the way, that's
what I always forget to point out.
Do you notice the anomaly in all of
these supposed American campaign trail tours? These are
all these aren't all the same spot,
But weird, these first two are, but it's
weird how we always seem to it's a
Trump Trump fans. Okay. Well, what are the
Israeli flags for? How why are the Israeli
flags there? Why are the Israeli flags there?
And well, that's a Israeli American council side
of it. But every single one of these,
even in this one, if you span out,
there are Israeli flags.
These ones are different at the bottom.
And look, here's Miriam Adelson speaking on his
podium.
I'm I'm not I don't even need to
say anything else. Those are what I just
said are facts. You guys can decide what
that means.
Here's Glenn Greenwald.
Perfect illustration of the Trump administration mindset and
priorities.
Rant against the evils of campus censorship
while expanding
hate speech codes
to ban common criticisms of Israel,
vow to destroy DEI
while forcing universities to create new DEI programs
for Jewish students.
See, it's really important that I'm great. Glenn
Greenwald of all people staking, taking a stand
on this, dying on the sill as it
were. It means something
because he has a good reputation and, you
know, there's plenty of things you can I
I can criticize anybody about something? I don't
agree with everybody about everything. The point though,
is that his track record, I do think
speaks for itself long term and not just
about always being right. Or even the point
is about his stance in regard to partisanship.
That's all I'm talking about here. He has
consistently shown that he'll criticize any side. If
it challenges his principles, I find that that'd
be integrity.
So my point is, him standing on this
and saying, you know, you can't it's hard
for you to come around and say you're
a racist, a a Nazi.
As a Jewish person himself, as somebody who
has consistently called out all of these things,
I think it means something. And the point
is that he has he's calling out what
other people would call us racist for saying,
which is that you're just doing the same
thing or rather even from the partisan side
of it with a different flavor.
And he says, I encourage people to read
the ransom contract between Trump regime and Brown
University
to and to consider the sheer madness of,
that we have reached,
whereby private institutions are being extorted to cut
off programming for disfavored groups. Now whether you
think about DEI or not, you know my
opinions on it. It's not the point of
what it is. It's about using your coercive
tactics to get them to do what you
want. Now if they were stopping DEI to
go to something that wasn't the same thing,
at least that would be okay. At least
they're stopping the bat, but they're not. And
start new programs
for the favored group, Jews.
Now, really, I have I think it's more
about using that for the Zionist agenda or
even just about Zionism. But either way, it's
the same point. You're creating a certain circumstance,
a certain,
you know, speech code, a certain censorship avenue.
That's the same thing everywhere you look. And
I've always pointed out it's not even about
the point. It's about how they utilize it.
And he says a person can can certainly
have different opinions about the merits of programming
to support different groups, but the fact that
institutions are being sorted
into promising
not to promote unlawful DEI goals while at
the same time promising to support a thriving
Jewish community is insane.
That was what he wrote. Now
some examples
of people
allegedly America
first. Randy Fine.
Actually, I forgot about let me play this
for you. Because this is wild. I mean
and this is what we so when they're
talking about that, when they're talking about Khalil,
for example, and trying to claim he's this
radical racist anti Semite who wants to hurt
you, this is the kind of thing that
they pretend is listen to what they point
to. And what you're about to see is
a video of a girl who, yes, is
being vulgar. Yes, is saying, you know, screw
you, you know, eff you.
But she has a right to say what
she wants. She has a right to think
what she wants. Isn't that what we pretend
in this country? And she's talking to a
person wearing an IDF shirt supporting Israel. Now
that's not crime. Right? Oops. Sorry. And I'm
and there's gonna be cussing, so heads up
on that.
The point though.
Imagine okay. Right now, look. This is we
don't have to tiptoe around this. Israel's committing
a genocide. The IDF is committing a genocide.
They're literally screaming and cheering and supporting, as
we're gonna get to in a second, the
execution of children, the raping of innocent people.
Okay? This is what's happening. It's been going
on for seventy seven years.
So as a person like her who clearly
is is upset about it, and you come
across a person who's wearing a support the
IDF shirt, is that not the same as
wearing a Nazi symbol in the middle of
the World War two?
That's gonna irritate a lot of people. How
dare you point out the obvious overlap to
exactly what's happening?
Yes. It's the same so the same thing.
You could argue, you know, how dare you
just attack him because he's wearing a certain
shirt. But it's it's the point that you
not that you,
accept it, but that you understand why somebody
might react that way, especially with all the
propaganda and the insane tactics taking place, the
attacks on Americans. The point is, she simply
yells at him.
And this is and let me play it
first, and let me show you what Ready
Fine has to say about that. An American
politician who claims to be America first. It's
gonna probably blow your mind. It it shocked
me. It really did.
Free Palestine, put it on fucking And
you're and you're ignorant. And then she pushes
the phone out of the way. Okay. Fine.
You know, charge her for assault if you
want to. See if that's six.
Imagine taking it further than that.
Imagine as a US politician
calling for her to be expelled from school,
calling her a Muslim terrorist,
which by the way, at at this point
in time can get you deported according to
Donald Trump or get you thrown in jail
according to Marco Rubio. Here's what he says.
Under the Florida law that I authored
and passed in 2019,
this Muslim
terrorist,
this white woman in The United States, must
be immediately expelled.
As a member of the US House Education
and Workforce Committee, I am personally calling
Florida State to ensure it is done. Why?
Because antisemitism.com
antisemitism,
stop antisemites on Twitter
called this out.
So Randy Fong jumps up and reacts because
that's what he's supposed to do.
And I said, this supposed America first politician
is calling for this American citizen to be
deemed a Muslim terrorist and expelled for expressing
her outrage toward those currently supporting a genocide.
What do you think about this? And is
Randy Fine America first or Israel first?
Right after that,
as the Red Pill Media points out,
it's just one phone call. Jewish congressman Randy
Fine got a Muslim student suspended from Florida
State for saying f Israel. Now I even
confirmed that she's even Muslim for crying out
loud, but it shouldn't matter regardless.
The idea that it matters more because of
your religion, isn't that the racism that you
guys keep talking about? I mean, it's insane.
These are the racists. That's the whole point,
which by the way, this is a perfect
moment to play this again,
which I alright. Booted out of StreamYard.
Gotta love how this works.
Let me play the clip I was about
to set up for you, and then I'll
get organized again.
Thank you, censorship.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state or it's a democratic
state for everybody, and that's what I would
like Israel to be. I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization,
Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel Mhmm. And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And and there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar reports, which the same conclusion,
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says That's right. The
Jews
have a unique
unique right to self determination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became a majority
Mhmm. They would still have no right to
serve the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Man, it's frustrating.
Having just
I have to, like, take precautions knowing that's
gonna happen. Welcome to Technogracy.
So here we are.
I lost some stuff, but here we are.
So the point is
one call.
One call it took him. He didn't even
write that. It took one call. She's been
suspended until expulsion hearing and has been trespassed
from campus.
Okay. How about every time a Zionist beats
up somebody that we can publicly see and
nothing happens?
Both should matter, guys. If you're gonna hold
him account of you pushing his phone away,
get you expelled from school, then you damn
well better do it for all the different
things that are being thrown at people protesting
Palestine or for Palestine.
I mean, it's just this person is the
guy calling for killing children, calling saying bombs
away, starve them all. He keeps posting stuff
like this.
And and and this is an American citizen
that he just called a Muslim terrorist. And,
again, the point is I don't even I
by based on looking at this, I couldn't
tell whether she was a Muslim or not.
If she is, it seems like she's probably
a convert, but I don't know for sure.
Either way, it doesn't change the reality of
this. Whether you're Jewish, Muslim, Christian, the point
is about your constitutional rights and the fact
that this monster is acting for a foreign
government against Americans.
Every single day, this guy is showing who
he is.
Here's another one. Stephen Miller
captioning what Glenn Glenn Greenwald said. And Glenn
said,
no foreign students are being deported by this
Trump state department and ICE for criticizing The
US,
only for criticizing Israel. This is a cap
this is basically responding to this ongoing conversation.
Criticizing America is tolerated but accepted, but criticizing
Israel isn't. I'm going exactly.
This is this is, you know, an educate
a a research journalist who does not just
scream things he doesn't know. And I can
agree with it because I can prove it
myself. And he says just like the, quote,
hate speech codes Trump demanded
US colleges adopt,
allow students to call The US a racist
endeavor, but not Israel.
Here's what Stephen Miller said.
This is just patently false.
Quick spoiler alert. It's totally not. We have
officials working continuously to identify
to identity how he may identify, imagine, revoke
or deny foreigners visas who espouse hatred for
America or its people. This is a top
priority. College students who witness such conduct can
use the ICE tip line. Also, there is
no speech code of any kind in Columbia
deal. By the way, anybody, Visa, green card,
and so somebody saying America sucks is not
a legal reason to deport somebody. Even if
the fact the fact that it even says
that like that's okay is insane to me,
Showing you this is a ridiculous person who
is even if but and the the point
is that's actually not what's happening. It's about
Israel. As Glenn will even follow-up and reiterate.
What what's crazy is that he thinks it's
okay to say, no. No. No. We're going
after Americans for going after The United States.
You know? You're allowed to hate this country.
You're allowed to think it's doing bad things.
By that logic, he could deport me. He
could put me in jail. Guess what? They're
going that direction. My point is I'm not
if you want if you can't decouple this
point what the government is and the American
people are, That he's trying to get you
to he's trying to make you think that
they're one and the same. Your job, America,
is to criticize the government. Your job is
to hold the feet to the fire, especially
when people like Miller are out there destroying
the country.
College students, he goes, you witness such conduct,
use the app tip line. There is no
speech code of any kind to Columbia deal.
Yeah. There literally is, and he posts the
screenshots next. This guy's a liar.
As we just talked about earlier, there is
an ironclad requirement with enforcement mechanisms to admit
students based on actual merit and not illegal.
He's leaning into what people thought was gonna
be the case. The meritocracy.
Nope. Not even remotely what's happening. And here's
gen x girl going 3,500
students have been detained for criticizing that genocidal
Pariah state that majority in The US hates.
Name one student who was detained for criticizing
The US.
Hasn't happened, guys. It's a fact. You can't,
Zionist, as she writes, because you work for
Israel and your government is to protect your
genocidal ethnostate. That's her opinion. But he's a
proud Zionist, and he actively does things that
are against American interests.
Even Robert Barnes chimes in and goes, Miller
is wrong. There is indeed a speech code
being imposed that redefines antisemitism
as anti Israel. Glenn Greenwald proved that.
So think about this, guys. If even Barnes,
who's a lawyer, who supports Trump, is calling
out Miller, the Zionist, lying to you about
going after America, what does that show you?
He's a dishonest person who's acting against the
American interest. He's saying that what he's doing
is going after anybody who criticizes a foreign
country.
Remember, he's the architect of this whole thing.
Glenn Greenwald falls up, and he goes, that's
patently false. He goes, these are demonstrable lies
from Stephen Miller.
Trump admin said in federal court see, they
they don't think most people even have the
time or the interest in reading these documents
like we often do on this show. He's
wrong, though. People are quickly recognizing that the
and I think they're quickly recognizing people are
not as stupid as they wanna pretend they
are, or maybe as stupid as they are.
Trump admin said in federal court it wants
to deport Tufts PhD student, that's Ozturk,
solely for her op ed in Israel. That
was their argument, guys. That's why she's not
in jail anymore. Trump White House adopted the
IHR
hate speech code, which which is simply criticizing
Israel is racism,
demanded it for Columbia, Harvard, and others.
Fact.
Here's the proof. Here's the link to it.
And, I mean, you it's just it's the
proof of what he just said.
Look for yourself. Look at their actual documents
and what they actually say why they did
it. It's obvious. Well, that's actually just the
report on it, but here's the document. It's
all right there for you to look at,
and this is so embarrassing. This is what
Miller does all the time.
Now part of me thinks he's lying, so
we see them lying. So we kind of
lose faith in this and everything collapse. I
feel like there's an element of just deconstruction
and collapse right now. But maybe he's just
trying to lie because he thinks you're that
stupid. I can't tell.
If Steve he says, if Steven Miller wants
the law wants to deport
law abiding students from US because they criticize
a foreign country he reveres,
everyone sees it. At least be honest about
it. Far worse is expanding the IRH the
IHR hate speech code that Trump admin adopted
and forced on universities.
It's terrifying stuff, guys. This is that this
is
unconstitutional.
And and Steven Miller says, oh, this this
was just what, Blake Blakely responded saying noticeably
absent is any denial that you guys are
targeting people for criticizing Israel.
Yeah. That's an interesting point. Right? So we
go, no. No. No. We're going after Americans
too. Okay. You just let it slide that
you're removing Americans or people from this country
for criticizing Israel.
Like like, even if it's the same point
in principle that you you have the right
to think and say what you want, even
though they don't care about that. You can
some most people even it would be more
amenable to the idea of doing it to
somebody criticizing the country that we're in.
Far cry from removing people who criticize a
foreign country, let alone one who's currently committing
genocide.
Very good point.
He shows you who he is every day,
guys. Now here's Pam Bondi. Thank you. What
is this? It's not
it's,
FSU president Richard McCullough.
Thank you for leadership and prompt action.
Antisemitism
will not be tolerated. Right. So this idea
will not be tolerated. Even though we call
mostly Palestine support antisemitism,
e but the point is, even hating Jews
for no reason is simply your opinion, and
you're allowed to think and say what you
want. I'll call you gross too, but you're
allowed to think it. The point
is they're calling people who support Palestine anti
semites and saying you're not allowed to hold
that opinion and deporting people for doing it.
All very clear. Here's Bondi working for a
foreign country. You go she goes she says,
and and my US attorney, Jack Huyken, will
be investigating this.
I simply said, Bondi out there fighting every
day to make Zionism great again, all while
violating your constitutional rights like it's her job.
Glenn points out
Jake Sherman reporting there's a funder there there's
the funders of the anti Massey Super PAC.
Maryam Adelson's PAC. John Paulson, Paul Singer.
What a surprise.
Glenn says, what a shock. The huge amounts
of money being poured into the super pack
to remove Massey
from congress are all coming from the big
GOP donors for whom Israel's a top cause.
Guys, this is this is, it's just such
an interesting point in time.
You have to realize that a couple years
ago, saying something like this would get you
boxed out of everything.
Right? Would would, you know, people would even
people in independent media would call you a
racist and how dare you? You're anti semite.
Some of them still will. My point is
that he's Jewish himself. And the fact is
that he's got a respectable background of work
in the independent or in the, you know,
in journalism. And he is standing on this
hill. I just think it's worth pointing out
again. He's saying Thomas Massie is trying to
they're trying to remove him because of Israel.
People in our government are trying to work
against him because he doesn't side with Israel.
How does that not show you what I'm
always talking about?
It does.
Alright. Look at that. One of the videos
that I have in my thread. He says,
hey. Here, by the way, is Trump who
wants Massey out talking about how the Adelsons
were in the White House more than anyone
and that they were always there to demand
things for Israel. That's one of the clips
of my long thread.
He sees it, guys.
Now Propaganda and Co simply points out the
New York Times. And that this is him
in in in, like, a Zoom thing.
And it says the New York Times has
a portrait
of the father of Zionism,
Theodore Herzl, hanging on the wall in their
office.
They are definitely unbiased when reporting on Palestine.
How ridiculous.
Now remember, Theodore Herzl was an atheist.
He had written documents in his journal and
everywhere else about how he hated Jewish people.
But I guess that doesn't matter for the
people who wanna pretend it's all about Judaism.
Here is an honest person. This is Aaron
Mate's father, Geva Mate,
telling and and p there are this is
somebody who lived through the Holocaust, somebody who
is a Jewish person himself who is telling
you Zionism is toxic.
Pay attention.
It's a toxic ideology. It's it's a cult.
And
what I mean by it's cult,
It denies reality.
It's a little bit bad volume. He said
it's a cult. Now I'll let it play
all the way through. I won't jump in,
so turn your volume if you want, but
it's a little hard. It's got, like, fuzzy
background in it. But he said it's a
toxic ideology, and it is it is a
cult.
I agree.
It hates everybody who criticizes it, attacks everybody
who criticizes just like any cult.
If you believe that
you're a traitor,
you know, you're suffocating you, you're a terrorist
supporter, you're a Nazi.
And
they repress anybody you put aside.
They can't tolerate.
Because they identify with it. It's the identification.
Identification means
the Latin word,
depend, which which means the same,
and frachere, which means to make.
Once in your unconscious,
you make yourself the same as,
then as soon as if I make if
if I'm a
a historical victim and if Israel is my
redemption,
then as soon as you criticize Israel, you're
attacking me because I identified with it. I
have no propensity
to think objectively
about This is exactly like the paradigm in
this country.
And and look. What do you know? This
Christian Zionism is rearing its head right now
all over the country. The point and that
doesn't have to be the only thing. It's
just partisans the same way. The point is
people are becoming
like, they they are it's their it's who
they are to be somebody supporting Trump, to
be somebody supporting Biden.
That's not healthy.
In fact, it behooves us more than anything
to be skeptical, especially
of the people you believe in. What actually
happened? I don't even care if somebody tells
them what happened. I won't believe it. It's
so blind. It's so narrow that there's no
debate. There's no discussion. They know how weak
their position is. What comes them up is
the support of the evil empire.
You know? First, the variation of the name
of Adam.
And what comes them up also, if I
may say, is the collaboration
and
cowardice and opportunism of the Arab
regimes.
Wild.
So David Ike points this out. Now let's
get into some overlapping points about the October
$74 that we've done a lot of work
on in the past. Two very important things
that I thought it was worthy enough to
put in the title of the these developments,
which you already know this, guys. If you
already follow this show, if you follow David
Icke, if you watched anybody who's being critical
about this, Efraut Faganston, you already know that
there's so many anomalies here that there's just
no denying that something went awry. Something was
either allowed to happen or planned.
Still, it's hard to tell exactly, but there
is no denying things like this.
He says, It was allowed to happen, David
Icke writes. So so what has followed in
Gaza could be, quote, justified by Israel defending
itself. Now, my one addition to that is
it very well could have been that there
was a level of allowance because, well, you
can't deny the
ignoring what they saw, the the removing of
the post, like, all the things that let
it be open.
But I don't know whether what happened is
what they planned for. That's something worth considering
or whether there was other anomalies that played
out or maybe there were multiple factions in
Israel that carried out something else or, you
know, there's all these different points.
Regardless, the point is this evidence does matter
in regard to what they allowed to happen.
I just don't see how they wanted this
Or or maybe they just thought that this
was enough to, you know, yet again, the
people of the world would ignore it. That's
certainly possible too. But just consider that there's
a lot of moving parts that we can't
truly verify. But what we do have is
things like this. He says, this has been
blatant since day one when the most defended
fence on Earth
with sensors that pick up birds and cockroaches,
which is true, Farfangasin, who was in the
intelligence side of it, testified to that, was
breached in multiple places with no response for
a long period of time.
Here's what this says.
Israeli Rafael Ayan
had his radio equipment confiscated
before October 7 and returned after October 7.
He tried to warn the Israeli army, but
he was told he was blocked from someone
in the top. Well, just like the girls
who'd said it and everything, we're seeing them
practice by the wall. And they go, you
report this again. We're gonna lock you up.
That's what they said.
Report we're trying to warn them about Hamas
coming in the gate, and they said, don't
tell us again.
Very weird. Here's what it says. Rafael's brother
said forces.
Let me see if I can see this
better. Hold on.
Send for, send forces.
Here we go. Let me just let it
play. Sorry. I couldn't read it because the
time was in there. Send forces to my
commander. My commander, his house there is surrounded
by the enemy. He says, please, brother, can
we get you out of here?
This is on October 7. That's what he
hearing. Before October 7, they take they took
away your your number of systems that they
decide you to return to you after seven.
That's the that's the radio.
If you had the the systems, which I
know nothing about, but if you had them
on October 7,
would this even have looked different even slightly?
He says the event wouldn't have happened.
I just begged to be heard and no
one listened.
I begged and approached everyone.
I approached the most senior people in the
system. They told me, Rafael, you're blocked from
the top. We have no idea who's blocking
you, but we don't know why.
Wow.
Here's another one. David, I go also says,
as I've been saying from day one, October
7 was allowed to happen to justify the
long planned final destruction of Gaza, which is
absolutely real, by the way, which we can
watch, but long planned, I agree with. An
Israeli soldier confirms the stand down order. As
you can see right here, no patrol on
the fence until 9AM.
That's never the case. Yeah. It's finished.
So he
says, 06:30 in the morning, October 7,
you're at the outpost.
For us, October 7 starts before 06:30
every day. I was a soldier in the
in the Mortar Platoon of the Gulani brigades
thirteen battalion.
You know, there no big surprise that the,
you know, Gulani, you know, the Jolani over
in Syria, totally not the same thing.
That night myself,
my sergeant
may have may he rest in peace.
The three of us were pulling an all
nighter.
We'd let ourselves pull an all nighter until
the dawn stand to.
And, you know, we in the mortal platoon
have time to sleep until the next stand
to.
And it says, so at 05:20, we're sitting
by the radio so as not to wake
the radio operator.
And, oh, by the way, this is for
the podcast. This is testimony in the Knesset.
This is in Israel. These are people speaking
Hebrew. And he's saying, and my deputy battalion
commander,
who was also seriously injured and thank God
he survived,
suddenly gets on the radio with a strange
message.
All stations. I don't know why. I don't
know how. Something along those lines. No patrol
on the fence until 9AM. What time was
this? 05:20 in the morning.
All stations are to hold their positions.
So in terms of ground forces, we don't
have anything significant. The brigade issued directive to
our forces pending a situation assessment until 9AM.
No vehicles to approach Burma.
I'll say it again. Until nine in the
morning pending the situation
assessment. So
until after this happened.
No vehicles to go down Burma, where in
the rear staging areas.
Remember remember the narrative they told you that
they had some event where they all had
to rush over the other side? That's not
true. That's been shown to be false by
numerous reports.
So they lied about that like everything else.
Don't ask too many questions. That's the directive.
That's what we do.
A little before all begins,
and Summer gives us this look like
and, you know, we're we're simple soldiers, just
combatants,
not combatants or officers who can ask questions.
An order from the deputy battalion commander, we
take the order and don't ask questions.
A routine passing of an order.
And sure enough, an hour later at 06:30,
suddenly alarms, sirens. Because I would tell you
living with this since October 7, and I
was very afraid to talk about it. When
I got asked to the Knesset,
after it was a period when I asked
some senior army officers what actually happened there.
Oh, excuse me. I should have muted that.
I'm just reading this. And there was some
who initially told me,
listen. There was a sniper threat from not
from certain area, and we didn't wanna send
soldiers so they wouldn't get hit. See, that's
what he was told. Don't go because there's
sniper threat. From what?
You're in these towers in a wall around
the area. You're told it's a sniper threat
from where?
Is there Hamas in the tower?
That doesn't even make sense.
And then over time, he said, there there's
a sniper threat. Wait a sniper threat. How
can I beat that? I'm only 200 meters
from the threat. I don't know. Basically, guys,
you get the point.
He's saying he got lied to about the
threat.
He realized very quickly he didn't make any
sense.
And that they basically found out that he
was what actually happened there.
I've been living with this my whole for
hole in my what do you say?
Hole in my brain
since October 7. Didn't have metaphor. That's something
in my heart. It feels to me that
listen, I don't know what it was. And
so, you know, he feels something is off
is the point. They were told to stand
down. Right? This guy gets gets his radio
taken away.
Told you're blocked from the top.
With everything else we know, guys, there's just
no way to misunderstand this. They were told
to stand down because this is something that
somebody at some level knew was gonna happen.
It's just crazy to me.
We talked about this
many times. One of the ones I think
I did a pretty deep dive on,
06/19/2024.
The undeniable reality of October 7 foreknowledge and
the Hannibal directive. There's tons well before that.
And the reality is the for the Hannibal
directive in its own right
I mean, every when you realize that they
decided to keep more more people died by
their hand than anybody else on October 7,
That's come out left and right at this
point. Even Israelis are calling that out. They
killed their own people, and they continue to
right now as we're gonna get into.
But remember, the people that are screaming about
just release the hostages going all the way
back to October,
even according to times of Israel.
Hamas had offered a release of all hostages
on the '2 ninth and the tenth right
in the beginning.
As long as the IDF didn't enter into
Gaza and they didn't care, they said very
clearly that hostages were secondary.
Here's one of them. Or first, what Mondwai
simply saying? You can read this for yourself.
It's a great thread.
You know, the most unhinged comment we get
all the time is just release the hostages,
which is just absurd because one, they've had
opportunities to over and over that Israel make
sure it doesn't happen. And because in most
cases, they're the ones killing them with their
own actions, and most Israelis call that out
today.
But Glenn Greenwald says one of the most
bizarre parts of Israel's US finance destruction of
Gaza, Israel supporters
in The US will constantly deny what Israeli
officials themselves
proudly admit.
Here's Israeli minister.
How do you say that? Alu Aluah
said the key war aim is not the
hostages,
but cleansing Gaza of non Jews.
She said that publicly
because that's what they're thinking. And they say
it publicly and your Trump and Biden administration
just ignore it. They lie to you. Again,
one of a thousand examples of how does
that not show you what's happening.
It's crazy.
And yet they'll come up there and go,
Release the hostages. Act like that's the case.
Or, Star, Steer, or is it Star? Cure,
Kier, Kier, Starmer. Something says, Release the hostages.
You know, and well, it's just it's just
stupid. Everyone sees what's happening, and yet those
people continue to push it because they support
it. And I'll include this as always. This
is all the way back from the, you
know, over a year ago. Defeating Hamas is
priority.
Everything else is secondary.
That's the that's the guy who used to
be in that position saying that. We hostages
are secondary.
In fact, I feel like I'm did they
change this title?
Pretty sure it said hostages are secondary, didn't
it? Am I crazy? Either way, it's same
point, but I just it's funny. I wonder
if they updated it now. That would say
a lot. Either way, they've always been telling
you that. Now, I'm gonna skip this for
time, but the point is is is another
yeah. In interesting overlap, US army nuclear submarine
officer who is now resigning
because of the Gaza genocide. He says, I
do not support what the US government has
been promoting in Gaza for the last twenty
two months. How can we claim to uphold
human rights when enabling war crimes?
Everyone is starting to find their courage, guys.
Now, I'm gonna play this. This is the
one I'm going to play today since you
might have already seen it, but you gotta
hear this. If you haven't heard this, you
have to listen to it.
This is a army a Green Beret, former
Green Beret who is telling you what he
literally witnessed,
talking to Tucker, by the way.
And as Abir points, just look at Tucker
Carlson's face, dude totally freezes at The US
vet, lays out Israel's army is killing this
little child and everybody else there.
But you need to see this because what
they're doing is horrific. And, I mean, I
played what? From the World Food Program to
another example of another officer? This is the,
like, the third one now. He was there,
guys.
Listen to what he has to say about
what he watched happen at these places that
the Israeli government, the US government, or all
trying to tell you are just helping people.
Bruce Tammy Bruce will scream at you about
how they're just trying to save people. Hamas
doing it all. Well, here's somebody who watched
it happen who was a part former US
marine veteran.
This young little boy,
his name is Amir.
I know that because when he walked over
from the the crowd of people,
he walked toward me. There was two there
was two of us standing there, two UG
Solutions guards standing in that area. And he
was walking towards us, and we thought maybe
he was hurt or maybe he was asking
for some more food because all he had
in his arms was a small bag of
rice, half a bag of flour, some lentils
that he had picked up from the ground.
He didn't have much.
And we thought maybe he was asking for
more food or maybe he was hurt. And
he we we notion him over.
And he came up, and he extends his
right hand
at us. And so we I I, you
know, I kinda walked up to him and
waved him over. And the guy standing next
to me, this young boy, grabs holds his
hand, and he kisses it. And then he
comes to me, and he holds my hand,
and he kisses it.
In in Arab culture, that is a very
significant sign of respect. That's not something that
that should be taken lightly or something that
should be
that that's a big sign of respect.
And we were we were taken aback by
that. The gentleman that was standing
next to me was also a military veteran,
combat veteran. So he's been to Afghanistan and
Iraq, and he understand he was he was
moved by it. He was touched. I was
touched.
And
as he was standing there, we were both
looking at him, and he was very emaciated.
He had no shoes on.
His pants were tattered. He had a a
a kind of a rope or string holding
his pants up.
Filthy. Probably hasn't bathed in months. Probably hasn't
eaten in days. And oh, by the way,
when they walk eight to 12 kilometers to
get to these sites,
the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation mechanism provides no water.
Zero. Not a single bottle
because it's too expensive.
Distributing water weighs so much that it breaks
down the the the profit per cost per
truck. Now really quickly,
I'm glad this is coming out through Tucker
Carlson show.
But are are we really gonna pretend that
he doesn't know this already?
How do you I mean, this is this
is self evident.
The whole world can see this, and we
but, like, Tila has been reporting it for
years now.
So I look at his dumbfounded face. I
mean, it's frustrating.
That's the you know, but it's I'm still
it's good. And I will still remote it
like I keep telling you because it's true,
and it's right to say these things.
But I just get I'll I'll read my
statement afterward, but I just think it's important
to think about, you know, that this has
been there.
The fair weather Piers Morgan's out there, they
knew this, and they were gaslighting you about
this while they knew children were starving to
death. Now they suddenly act like they're the
ones saving the day. Just that bothers me
sometimes.
That's a fact. Because I asked why, and
I was given a lesson in it. This
is why. It's too expensive. So we give
them no water.
All of their food, by the way, requires
water to cook it. Rice, lentil, beans, flour.
You gotta have water. So what we're giving
them, I don't know how they're eating it.
But
he comes he's standing there, and I and
I put my arm on his on his
right on on his left shoulder.
And I look at him, and I can
feel the bones in his shoulder. I can
feel the the the weakness in his arm.
I can feel the vulnerability.
I can feel the desperation.
And I look at him and I looked
and I got down on my knees where
I'm looking at him in the eyes. And
then I say to him, I said, people
care.
America cares.
You're not gonna be forgotten.
People in the world
care.
And he doesn't speak English and I don't
speak Arabic.
But the connection we had in looking at
each other, he felt like
he felt he felt
for the first time in a long time
that there was someone that cared.
And I got down on a knee, and
he came in to his level. And the
items he had in his hand, he sets
them down on the ground.
And he his hands he raises his hands,
and they're small, fragile.
You can you can see bones sticking you
know, just the bones to the skin. And
he places his hands on my face, and
he kissed me.
And he said he looked at me in
the eyes, and he says, thank you. He
said it in English.
Thank you.
Like,
people are starving in Gaza.
People are dying in Gaza.
These children that are starving and dying,
these
these children, you know,
they look like everyday Americans.
This child is picking up noodles off the
ground with his bare hands because there was
no food left. So he's picking up noodles
to put into his backpack.
Amir goes back toward back to the main
group, and he goes out the exit. We
had a very strict protocol that they come
in a certain way, get the aid, and
then they go out a certain way. From
the way they came in, it takes them
back to the way they came in. The
the exit takes them back that same way.
So they enter from the Morag Corridor.
They go south. They go through the station.
They exit, and they go north to the
Morag Corridor. So coming in and going out,
they're tied right back into the active combat
zone.
Site Number 2 particularly is a little bit
different than the other sites because it's in
between Site 1 And 2.
And there's a IDF combat outpost
just off the corner of SDS 2. So
there's a berm
that lines that road going out. Which you've
seen, by the way. We've shown you the
video that he references where they're just popping
off shots over the berm and cheering as
they shoot people.
That's what's happening. He was one of the
ones there. He'll tell you. He watched he
he was involved with that.
And the reality is we just said that
we they're not giving them water by design.
Too expensive. Right? Because usually, humanitarian issues are
really about them making money. Right? But on
top of that, then how do they cook
this food? Yeah. Well, they're probably eating dry
food
or trying to find dirty water to cook
it in.
But having them walk all the way there
with no water and then walk right back
through the choke point through which they're fired
at
is a death march, guys.
It's what this is.
They know what they're doing.
The governments know what they're involved in.
He's literally on one of the biggest shows
in the world telling you he watched it.
And what changed?
What happened? Did they stop?
Did they even pretend they care? Well, Well,
Trump sure as hell gave a couple of
statements about how it's sad, what's happening in
Gaza, but guess what didn't happen? They didn't
shift their policy. They're still funding Israel. They're
still blindly captured by the Zionist government. That's
what's actually continuing.
But I'm glad people are seeing it. I
really am because we need to change this.
So if people are leaving the exit
and someone is on the the East side
of the berm shooting into the crowd over
here,
you can't see
what's on the other side of that berm
because of the the the obscuration, the field
of fire. So the IDF are shooting at
the crowd that's leaving. As the crowd left
and they would hit the Moroc corridor to
go west, the IDF would shoot at them,
shoot at their feet, shoot over their head.
We would shoot at them. Shoot at their
feet, shoot over their head, shoot into the
air.
Sorry. It's like a weird ad in between.
Here it goes.
Air.
And the bullet start hitting off the ground.
There's video of this. It's on the BBC
video. Hitting off the ground, see dirt flying
up.
And I I was still on the site.
I was I was below the berm.
It was the second time we had done
distribution.
So when I heard the gunfire kickoff, the
automatic machine gunfire, I thought we were under
attack. I thought something had happened. So I
ran up to the Southern Berm, and I
laid down to take cover. You know, I'm
observing, and I'm looking. And I see the
shooting keep going on by just the rap
and Palestinians dropping on the side of the
road. So
Amir didn't make it home.
He walked 12 kilometers to get some food,
picked up scraps off the ground
because that's all that was left because the
the eight minute mayhem took all of the
food. And by the time he got there,
walking with no shoes,
hungry and tired, the only thing left for
him was to pick up some remnants off
the ground.
And when he left, he was he was
he was killed by the IDF.
Why?
Because they lack discipline,
They lack standards,
and they lack basic human decency.
Wow.
And the sad reality is there's nothing new
in that other than firsthand evidence of what
we've been telling you
from way before October 7.
Right there. I just don't know how anybody
can go forward. Like I said before, you
either
it's right there.
Sure. I mean, obviously, let's just he could
be lying. Right? What about the other 70,000
people that over the years I mean, all
the doctors, all the people that were there,
the many whistleblowers from the IDF, from the
US government, from the positions in within the
the military. I'm
it just it's overwhelming how ridiculous it is
that we can and you have the only
thing to come here to
conclude is that these governments are either captured
or a part of it.
Like, willingly or captured. I just don't know
how else to make sense of this.
And this this person,
asked, you know, I'll buy like, well, my
my statement was let's read this first. I'm
so very happy this is finally finally breaking
through for some.
But remember,
this has been ongoing for seventy seven years,
and most of it has been as obvious
as it seems right now, just suppressed.
So it behooves you to be very skeptical
of those only now beginning to call it
out. And I'm not talking about him, obviously.
He just he saw this because he was
there. I'm talking about and not even necessarily
Tucker.
He's just letting him say his piece. So
good. I'm glad. I will share this. But
about anybody out there trying to act like,
Piers Morgan is a really obvious example for
me, who up until thirty seconds ago was
still going, you you condemn Hamas, and now
he's suddenly having these grandstanding moments with the,
you know, backer of the of the settlement
movement.
It's not new, guys. This has been obvious
for years. He just suddenly decides to call
it out because it's in his interest. That's
what I believe.
Either way, Tucker or anybody else, myself included,
just consider whether or not, always
Important right now. Now, she says, I'll bite.
What could be the agenda? Okay. I'll explain.
I said, one of the many possibilities because
there's plenty I could outline. One of them
and the one that I've often put forward,
well, hypothetically, you know, giving the gaining
the trust of a suspicious population
who is rapidly becoming aware of a long
suppressed truth
by, quote, revealing that truth through a controlled
source, but only doing so once said truth
is already coming out and only in a
limited truncated way. See how simple that is?
Now, this is happening all the time.
When things they don't want you to know
or suddenly starts becoming become seen, well, it's
it they use it.
We'll throw it at you in a way
that gained trust from certain people, and then
we'll give it in a limited way so
you don't see the full picture. You get
so those of us over here are going,
wait, wait. That's not the whole thing. You're
missing a big part of it. And we're
already 17 stories down the road. That's how
it works every single time. Now right now,
we're at a point where people are starting
to go, woah. Woah. Hold on. He's still
saying something. Things are shifting. But we're in
a moment where the every time they get
to a point like this, there's something new
that drives people back into the illusion, at
least from my experience.
But that is more to think about. You
know,
any of them
suddenly starting to see it is simply about,
like, maybe they'll call this out to the
end. But then the next time something comes
around, they're there to manipulate you. If you
don't think it happens, I don't think you're
paying attention. It's been going on a long
time. COVID was very clear. Many people that
right up to this very day will still
make the arguments that I agree with in
regard to COVID
very clearly shifted to pulling you back into
the mainstream. And maybe it's because they only
saw that one story, but I think we
all sense there are people that started to
recognize that story was lost and that they
could gain that clout and use it for
their own benefit or for the governments.
I'm gonna go through these quickly to wrap
up here, guys. The point is,
as Derek highlights, next time a Zionist puppet
repeats a talking point about Hamas stealing the
aid, share this with them. This is a
USAID
analysis from Trump's administration
that found no evidence Hamas was stealing aid.
Now the there's reports from before Trump's administration
because there's no evidence. Because the reality is,
as Robert and I discussed, the ISIS linked
gangs that are now running the GHF food
shooting lines
were the ones that were in between the
food coming in that Israel barely let through
and then getting to the Gaza people and
Palestinians.
And they were the ones that were stealing
food and hiking the prices that Israel is
working with. It's damn near public, guys. It's
evidence that's even come through Israeli sources. You
can see it. In the middle of the
Knesset, they acknowledged that they were ISIS linked.
So you're telling me the group the the
ISIS group you're fighting that are supposed to
be killing Jews are the ones that you're
working with. It's just all the reality is
Al Qaeda ISIS all these things. They're always
working with them, and that's why the point's
irrelevant about them funding Hamas. Not that that
invalidates the act of armed resistance, but the
reality is there are parts from a long
time ago that have been manipulated.
They are not The reality of this is
Israel starving people to death as evidence will
tell you, as whistleblowers will tell you, as
IDF members will tell
you. Oh, and this is just that this
is, that interview with Tucker and the and
the guy the Green Beret veteran.
Mister user just says all things you've been
reporting for a really long time, which I
appreciate.
I was I shared this. I think it's
an important interview to watch. Same as the
one with,
Marshall Marshheimer, I believe, is how you say
his last name. It's a great interview. A
lot of good things are coming out of
that, but still, same point as always. Question
it. Question the intention, but share the important
truth. Always.
Now, this is just disgusting. I'll play this
really quickly. Think about what we're I mean,
really quickly, actually, let me do this.
I'm gonna come right back to that.
Here is
oh, well, that's why I was gonna play
it first, I guess. Let me just do
the show. You see, this is the sad
reality right now, guys.
I'm sorry to show you things like this,
but this is Dan Dan McAdams says, don't
be afraid to speak out against this holocaust.
Don't worry. People will whisper about you if
you do. You will surely answer if you
do not.
These are children starving to death every single
day in Gaza according to everybody at this
point. But here's what Israel does. Now there's
an there's a point to be made here
about people with already like, children that already
have certain deficiencies who are dying first.
The argument that somehow that that's okay, that
Israel comes out and says, unlike his brother
standing by his side,
Mohammed suffers from cerebral
palsy.
Okay.
Well, he's still dying of starvation though. Okay.
And they go, but, baby, you see you
see it then. Time spread a misleading story
with a picture of a sick disabled child
to promote the narrative narration excuse me, the
narrative of starvation.
He is starving. So too are a lot
of children according to every single thing you
could look at other than propaganda. But because
he's got some other thing wrong with him,
it's okay that he's starving or it's okay
that he died? Are you act are you
arguing he died from cerebral palsy in the
middle of a genocide? I mean, it's insane
what they're doing.
Playing into Hamas propaganda. That's Israel's account.
My god. And Dave DeCamp, who I'm interviewing
soon, by the way, couple of days from
now. I forget exactly what day. It's in
my calendar. He says, hey. The state of
Israel, starving children with disabilities to death is
also bad.
And they're always the first to go when
a famine sets in. He's right.
So that's the point that they're trying to
they're trying to play this. And here is
Katie Halper calling out
Daniel Friedman.
When they shared this clip, this image of
that dying child, regardless of his other ailments,
who's dying of starvation.
David Daniel says, I'm sorry the Palestinian's widespread
practice of cousin marriage produces so many children
with congenital conditions and diseases, but you can't
blame that on the Jews. That's actually what
he wrote.
Katie just simply says, you may have deleted
this tweet, but here's a screenshot to document
your depravity.
Good.
90 fine.
If kids were actually starving in Gaza, the
New York Times wouldn't have had to use
a picture of a child within rare
you mean aside from the other thousand pictures
that we can show? This guy is the
worst person in congress.
This is the Laurel Loomer level in Congress.
It's insane to me. This is a this
guy is seething
with hatred and vileness
every day. Everything about the Palestinian cause is
a lie. He says,
My god.
And then, yeah, here's Janice
girl. Well, he she says, when you're too
fat to understand starvation and scrolls through an
endless
screen. I mean, this guys, if we still
have to try to convince you after what
we just showed anything that they're not starving
or convince you that we're watching this starvation
take place in addition to genocide?
I mean, is there even anybody out there
genuinely pushing back on this other than people
like this who are getting paid by Israel?
So before we come back to that,
Yeah. So in case you missed it, they're
starving to death every single day. Here's what
Megyn Kelly had to say.
Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much
stock in the images coming out of Gaza,
that that phrase, because they're manipulated and they're
masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their
own children starve just as long as they
can put them on camera and show them
off to the world. That that's Hamas. And,
frankly, it's a lot of Palestinians, so I'm
very skeptical of taking those images at face
value and saying it's Israel's fault.
Wow.
Now that's, like, straight up genocide denial. Like,
you you're I'm just not gonna listen to
whatever comes out because lie Palestine.
That's stupidity. That's willful ignorance. Now, yeah, obviously,
anybody could argue that left, right, up, down,
Palestine, Hamas,
Israel, the IDF. Anybody could lie, and they
all tend to to serve their agenda.
But the idea of you just disregarding
all of the evidence from every institution and
every group that has standing in the conversation
because Palestine's lie Palestinians lie, that you'd rather
watch their own children's star. She is either
that warped by the propaganda or is clearly
pushing Israeli propaganda. Like, the worst level of
it, and Piers Morgan just sits there like
a moron and nods along as he's over
here shouting other people down for claiming children
are dying.
Kills me.
That's disgusting. I mean, god darn it, guys.
That is the worst people. This is the
kind of thing I'm always talking about. That
is makes my skin crawl, the kind of
people they are.
Specifically, what she said right there. Now Blakely
says she's always been a despicable racist. No
surprised
she's also a scumbag Zionist repeating Israeli Hasbara,
the famous blaming Palestinian children for their own
murders.
Wow.
She points out Charlie Kirk, Israel's not starving
Gaza.
Israeli minister,
yes, we are. Right? So here they are
screaming that we're not gonna trust all that.
Ben Gavir will proudly tell you to your
face that we're killing children by starving them.
He will proudly
display this. He says this is him saying,
resuming humanitarian aid to Gaza is a grave
mistake. We cannot give our enemies oxygen, which
by the way also means the hostages that
they claim they wanna save, but they'll starve
to death to stop the mosque because they
clearly don't care about them.
Here's another example. Here is he's literally saying,
in a in a morally bankrupt approach,
while our hostages are in Gaza,
the prime minister is sending
humanitarian aid to Gaza. Now remember, that aid
is not making it to Palestinians, and they're
not even really doing that. It's other people
sending it where it sits outside.
The claim that they've gotten some through the
GHF, gotten remnants through is what he's talking
about. That's it.
And he says, I think at this stage,
the only thing that should be
sending to Gaza is shells.
That's what he says.
This is one of the most influential people
in the current cabinet. This this is what
they're doing. And And he says Israeli minister
of national security, Ben Gabbir, says Netanyahu is
morally bankrupt for allowing aid into Gaza, which
he's not even really doing. Everything everywhere will
show you that outside of their screams.
Fish shop.
First clip.
Do more aid. Yeah. The US. The US
is gonna do more aid for Gaza,
but we'd like to have other countries participate.
We're gonna mention that to the European Union
today.
You know, it's that's an international problem.
It's not a US problem. It's an international
problem, and,
we're giving a lot of money and a
lot of food and a lot of everything.
If we weren't there, I think people would
have starved,
frankly.
It Help me ask you. Do you think
he's just that uninformed, which is not surprising
to me? He seemed to actually think that
that guy had MS thirteen tattooed on his
knuckles. I think he's being played and corralled
a lot of ways, handled.
It's hard to see that sometimes. It's hard,
you know, hard to miss it rather.
He could just be lying to you right
now, you know, but the idea that he
genuinely think they would have start they are
starving
literally because of what you're doing. The pier
during Biden, the GHF interview, they're shooting innocent
people. He's testifying to it. You know, he
hears this stuff. You don't think he saw
Tucker's interview.
Here he is lying.
Hamas does it all. We're they would die
more if we didn't give them you're not
giving them anything.
They would have starved, and it's not like
they're they're eating well,
but a lot of that, food is getting
stole by stolen by Hamas. You know, this
My god. I just it it kills me.
It's not true. Fox News out here screaming.
It's all Hamas, claiming only a 100 children
have died, like ridiculous
propaganda.
That's not a joke, by the way. That's
what Fox News is saying. Stealing the food.
They're stealing Nope. A lot of things. You
ship it in and they steal it. Nope.
That's the ISIS link gangs that Israel supports
funds and and allows to happen. Just like
Hamas on the day past days. The point
is that he knows this stuff or somebody
around him knows this stuff. You know why?
Because people are testifying about it. They're telling
them that.
The idea that you can see what's actually
happening. They steal it.
A lot of things, you ship it in
and they steal
it, then they sell it. That's the that
that's the ISIS linked gangs that have been
selling it. There was another point. Sold by
stolen by Hamas. You know, they're stealing the
food.
Something else jumped from mine. Well, anyway, the
bottom the again, the bottom line here, that's
not really what's happening. My name is Oops.
Sorry. Wrong button.
The aid that they're sending in is largely
not getting in, and the ones that they
do allow in is being used for bait
to kill all these people.
The idea that Hamas is stealing aid. I
mean, you realize, right, you realize how stupid
this argument is now because they're funneling this
through this one group who's just jumping it
out and killing people. See, are you telling
me that Hamas is running up and grabbing
noodles off the ground and you're popping them
in the head?
This is just you just can't see you
can't miss how dumb all of this is.
And that's the worst part seeing is how
important, how serious, how earth shattering this all
is.
Here and and Glenn Glenn says, what is
happening in Gaza is a 100% a US
problem, which you all know. You're not stupid.
The US government, The US worker has paid
for Israel's destruction of Gaza, armed it, and
diplomatically protected under Biden and Trump on a
fully bipartisan basis. It's a US crime as
much as is as it is an Israeli
crime. Here's another clip.
What do the images of starving kids in
Gaza make you feel, Donald Trump?
Or in The Middle East, you talked about
the images coming out of Gaza and the
starving kids. Those images are still going. Many
of them are much worse.
Thinnered children, starving. What what do you what
do you see or feel when you look
at those images today? Well, it's terrible. You
know, when I see the children and when
I see especially over the last couple of
weeks,
and people are stealing the food. They're stealing
the money. They're stealing the money for the
food.
They're stealing weapons. See, you know this argument.
Are we actually pretending that you're sending in
money?
Guys, that's not happening.
The idea like, okay. The logic is that
there's not aid to be gained in Gaza.
Right? That's why it has to be sent
in. So are we pretending that you're gonna
give them money to buy aid that doesn't
exist in Gaza? Because they're they think you're
this stupid.
The reality is their money is going to
people that they're manipulating
like it has in the past. Like, the
money we'll just play it again. So are
you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted Hamas to
try to prevent a Palestinian state? Yeah. Sure.
He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record. Whoever wants
to avoid
the threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission
of our prime minister is to let
Qatar to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
Yeah. That's the head of Shin Bet, former
head, and a former prime minister telling you
exactly what's going on. Now, no, that's not
a narrative that undermine the legal act of
armed resistance regardless of whether they're funded by
Israel, which previously they were. But that's not
the same as saying they're completely controlled by
them. At least they not anymore if they
ever once were.
A lot of nuance to it, guys, but
the reality is that's a fact. And so
as he's saying, my point has always been
that money they sent in, they claimed that
was for aid. There is not they're sending
money in
for obvious reasons, guys. Forgive they're manipulating
the situation. They're not trying to aid anybody.
So when he mentions money right here, I
think it's a slip or it's some kind
of an error they're trying to spin in.
They're lying to you, and they think we're
this stupid.
The money they're stealing. And what I see,
especially over the last couple of weeks,
and people are stealing the food. They're stealing
the money. They're stealing the money for the
food.
God. So stupid. They're stealing weapons. They're stealing
everything. It's a mess. Weapons. Okay. So you're
bringing weapons into Gaza now? I didn't know
that was part of the humanitarian aid plan.
I mean, what do you think, guys? Is
that not the stupidest thing in the world?
That whole place is a mess.
The
Gaza Strip, you know, was given many years
ago so that they could have peace.
That didn't work out too well
when He's just so shockingly uninformed about all
of this. It's embarrassing to listen to him
ramble about stuff like this. He doesn't know
what he's talking about. Israel gave that up.
Whoever was the prime minister
at the time, who I know
who it was.
But
I forgot forgot about that.
I'm just I'm really tired already.
This is just the this is okay.
He listen to what he says right there.
This is the moment where it's like, okay.
I'm just I'm embarrassed for him. He's so
full of hubris. He has to act like
he'd so he just he doesn't know. He
doesn't know who he's referring to. He doesn't
know who the prime minister was, obviously.
Listen to what he says. Poured out too
well.
When Israel gave that up,
whoever was the prime minister Okay. When they
gave it up, whoever's the prime minister
At the time, who I know Whoever was
the prime minister at the time, who I
know Who it was. Who it was. So
you know who he was, but you didn't
know. You four words later, you now know,
but you started by going, like, whatever it
was, who I don't know, who I know
because I know him.
It's like it's just it's it's so Trump
right there. You have to always be I'm
the know I know him and I'm from
I'm you know, I know what's going on
and I know couldn't you just admit you
might not know who it was? I can't
remember off the top of my head who
the minister was or maybe I never knew.
Can't do that. Always gotta be pushing out
the idea. And you and you make yourself
look that stupid by just trying to force
in
you get it. It's just it's funny to
me. That's crazy. That's an add to the
point of the rambling narrative about what you
think you know. He is just reciting
narrative at this point, and it's clumsy.
But it was not exactly a virtue. You're
gonna have peace. That didn't work out too
well.
When Israel gave that up,
whoever was the prime minister
at the time, who I know
who it was,
it was not exactly a very clever thing
to do because that was given so that
they finally have peace, and it's actually made
the situation
worse.
But we'll see what happens.
Yeah. Like like, he's just some innocent bystander
and totally not completely funding the ongoing genocide.
My god. Iran is acting up. I think
that we have a lot of people acting.
We have Venezuela. So we're just rambling into
the wind now. We started off on a
direct question about Gaza starvation, and you just
rambled a couple of things about relating to
Gaza. Now Iran's bad and, you know, Venezuela.
Gets, you know, okay. We'll just ramble away
for the point.
Bad, guys. Bad. That's that's bad. That's very
obvious. They're acting up in a different way.
They're sending they continue to send people that
we rebuff
to our border. They can continue to send
drugs into our country, Venezuela.
Can't remember the question was, how do you
feel about Gaza children starving? Now we're on
Venezuela and migration through the country. Yeah. They've
been very nasty,
and we can't let that happen.
But, we and we have other countries too.
We do have, and this is just getting
a little off subject, but we have now
the safest order we've ever had.
And I think in many respects, we probably
have the most successful. I and I say
it all the time. Every You get you
start off by asking how you feel about
children dying of starvation,
and within thirty seconds, he's praising himself.
Very Donald Trump for you. Leader when I
went to NATO the other day, every leader
said,
you have the hottest country in the world.
We have we have the hottest country in
the world now. What is this? A Taylor
Swift album?
The hottest country in the world? Guys. I
mean, this is just embarrassing in a 100
different ways. You know? Okay. The level of
Biden being a senile, decrepit fool who can't
think and tie his own shoes,
not the same level as what Trump's doing
right now. It's just wild. Not just that,
but the the Zionism, the I mean, what
the world is laughing at us right now.
And here we go, hottest country. I mean,
that's like him going they came and said,
please, sir, please make a deal. And then
it turns out none of them even reached
out to him.
That's embarrassing in its own right because, you
know what, they know they didn't reach out
to him. So they're looking at him going,
wow. That's weak.
We never asked him that. Like, you know,
you know, it's just it's just it screams
desperation to me. And in hundreds of billions
of dollars,
we have
the highest stock market we've ever had. We
have the best numbers we've ever had.
But we have hundreds of billions of dollars
pouring into our our country.
I don't think any of that is true.
Not really. When you break it down in
the real your tariffs and money everything about
it. I just I just just crazy. And,
again, how do you feel about the children
starving in Gaza,
and he ends by praising himself in 17
different ways? I think it's, Lies, by the
way, but still praising himself. Honest. And by
the way,
one year ago,
our country was dead. We had a dead
Dead. Right? Because we didn't live here.
God.
I just feel like you know, it makes
me sad that there's anybody out there who
is swayed by something so stupid, so juvenile.
Now she goes a wrong rant here. I'm
I'm wrapping up here. I'm tired already, but
this is worth reading. Caitlin Johnstone just cares
the part. The point is Brianna Wu, clear
Zionist supporter,
has been screaming everything's fake for so long.
Gaza's lying just like just like Megyn Kelly.
She finally comes out and says,
this was a one above the fold in
the times today. I support Israel as strongly
as someone can, and I have extreme concerns
about their past reporting, but every other paper
is saying the same thing. Oh, so now
you know it's true. Right? Think about the
logic of these people, the lack thereof. So
I have to conclude because they're all saying
the same thing because that's not possibly propaganda.
Now I'm not even saying it is. I'm
just saying it's funny that that's the logic.
Well, all the papers say the same thing,
so it must be true.
After countless exaggeration,
the cries of wolf are actually true.
So all see and this is why Caitlin
Johnstone was just screaming about mad about this.
That after you watch a genocide carry out
to this point, then you've denied everything, calling
it pollywood, fake baby chill dead children. They're
lying about everything. No one's starving. To now
going, okay. Finally, now it's real.
That shows you what that's what Caitlin's mainly
making, the argument.
They have all they've lost control. And right
now, even them arguing about how the PR
needs to go, they are very aware that
nobody buys their BS anymore.
And he said she says Israel has every
right to defend itself.
Wow.
So,
who has called Israel's action genocide?
And it's more than this, by the way.
Beth Sellum, Israeli human rights group, Human Rights
Watch, Amnesty International, Center for Constitutional Rights, International
Association of Genocide Scholars, UN Special Rapporteurs, International
Court of Justice, the Limpkin Institute specializing in
genocide, genocide experts who wrote for New York
Times going, I'm an expert. I know what
it looks like. On and on and on,
guys. That needs to matter. Not that you
should trust any one of them independently or
all of them together at the same point.
They all could be lying to you, but
look at the facts and recognize that it
certainly means something, even if it's just the
shifting of the Overton window or the narrative,
that everybody withstanding is telling you that this
is a genocide. And it also just obviously
is.
B'Tselem, Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. B'Tselem,
the Israeli human rights group, the leading group,
one of the leading in the world, in
fact. It sounds inconceivable, but it's the truth.
Everyone's telling you. Daniel McAdams, look at this
photograph.
Before and after satellite of Gaza City. Okay?
There's Gaza City.
This is what it looks like today. You
tell me
what that looks like to you.
Daniel Daniel calls it a holocaust.
I agree.
Max says, arguably, the biggest fraud pulled by
US media during the genocide is ignoring the
very common
and very open genocidal pleas
pledges, excuse me, from the entire Israeli government
in Hebrew. We keep pulling this out too.
There's a there's a running meme right now
on Twitter.
It's like, you know, the the worst mistake
I ever made in my life was translating
a Hebrew text. And it's kind of an
unfair thing to say because there's plenty of
people writing in Hebrew in in opposition to
what's going on. But there are some really
disgusting people that think they just, you know,
they're writing they're writing in Hebrew, no one's
gonna see it, that are calling for the
death of children, rape of people. It's horrifying.
And he says, this has never been difficult
to figure out. It's never been a a
mystery. It's it was genocidal intent from day
one. And here he is. He has no
negotiations, occupy the area, war until the end,
encourage immigration. That's Ben Kabir.
Guy's a maniac.
Maniac.
Here is the Daniel Weiss, the leader of
the occupation movement. She's and he she says,
there will be no more Gaza Gazans than
Gaza. The murderers and their supporters will be
killed. And those who want to live decent
lives will move to Africa, Canada, Indonesia,
Egypt. Following her interview on Piers Morgan uncensored,
unhinged settler leader, Daniella Weiss, went on channel
thirteen, supposedly to be schooled for her, scolded
for her as Bara inappropriate performance on the
popular talk show. But, really, just in order
to give her another stage to spew deranged
s h I t that would attract viewers.
Here's a report from Middle East Eye. ICC
chief Khan
warned to drop Netanyahu arrest warrant or be
destroyed. That was two weeks ago. That's not
the that's that's not the same story as
before. It's a new threat. A new threat.
Ali Abunamat and Arab regimes have just endorsed
a plan to meet Israel's war goals through,
quote, diplomacy.
So it's not a surprise. And and most
people have called out the the falsehood of
The UAE, the, you know, the people out
there pretending to care but siding with Israel.
And they're the ones who have now endorsed
a plan to meet Israel's war goals of
genocide,
total disarmament of all Palestinian resistance, and creation
of a demilitarized
Palestinian,
Bhutan,
run by collaborators and at the mercy of
genocidal Zionists. Yeah. So nothing new.
And,
RJ Phoenix simply says everyone needs to know
this farcical vote
faith the know this farcical vote faith isn't
about supporting Palestinians. It's about more subjugation of
Palestinians.
Excellent piece by Abu Binwal. You should you
should watch it. It's important. He does good
work.
But it's obvious, guys.
It really is.
I'm gonna end, actually,
deciding now with that video. I believe I
still have it.
Of her talking with Morgan. I do feel
like it's a good clip to share. We've
played it before, maybe not.
Nope. It's not popping up. We'll end with
something else. But regardless, guys,
it just you know, it it's never ceases
to amaze me
how ridiculously
obvious this stuff is. And it's not just
our opinion. It's not just some echo chamber.
You know? You can really stand back for
some of these things. You it's not hard
to see. Even through the propaganda, even through
the censorship,
it's very clear to see what's going on
here. And yet, as always, they just keep
going. They keep going forward.
So, you know, at the point again to
kind of go go off that original point
of the show of the IMA show is
that, you know, we have to recognize
there are bad things in the world. That
can't be denied. We can't overfocus on other
things and ignore what's really in front of
us. But at the same time, we can't
lose ourselves to the the, you know, the
debt the terrible
desperation, the the anxiety, the paranoia. We have
to try to stay measured and focused and
deal with the facts
and recognize, in my opinion, at the very
least, that I mean, think about it. Like
I said the other day,
despite all of the pressure and the censorship
and the and the, you know, kicking us
off of platforms and and financial stuff, not
just us, but anybody.
Despite all of that being weighted over this
conversation, it is still breaking through. How is
that not a monumental success? And on top
of that, that it's still changing the conversation
with everything they're throwing at it. The world
is changing their perspectives on this, and they're
still trying to push it back in the
bottle. It's not gonna happen. But the point
is that they're gonna make your life difficult
because they're still drowning in these lies. You
know, something will shift. They'll be, you know,
removed. They'll grow back into power. Something will
shift. But as of right now, the point
is that they're gonna make your life as
hard as possible until they can put that
genie back in the bottle or destroy it
from memory.
My point is that that's because you're winning
right now. You are making a difference. You're
reaching people. People are opening their minds about
whatever all everything we talked about, whether it's
health focused stuff around mRNA shots or the
ongoing genocide.
Just recognize that positive note even though it
feels crazy, even though it feels like it's
bad because it is in some ways.
But this is what real change looks like
in my opinion. It's, you know, the hardest
things in life in anything.
The rather, the the things most worth doing
are almost always the hardest in my opinion.
All the more reason to keep going.
Thank you for tuning in today. I love
you all as always. Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.