President, The United States will once again stand
shoulder to shoulder with the state of Israel.
I will support Israel's right to win
its war on terror, and we will win
fast. You have to win, and you have
to win fast.
When I'm president, we will deport the foreign
Jihad
sympathizers
and Hamas supporters
from our midst Monday.
And I will work with you to make
sure that Israel is with us for
thousands of years. We're not gonna let go
of it. I will ban refugee settlements from
terror infested areas like the Gaza Strip, and
I will put every single college president on
notice. The American taxpayer will not subsidize the
creation
of terrorist sympathizers
on American soil.
No president has defended Israel and Jewish Americans
more than president Donald j Trump.
He declared Jerusalem
the undivided
eternal capital of Israel
and moved our embassy there.
On 12/06/2017,
at my direction,
The United States finally and officially recognized Jerusalem
as the true capital of Israel.
Today, we follow through on this recognition
and open our embassy in the historic and
sacred land of Jerusalem.
Trump imposed
crippling economic sanctions on Iran,
aimed to curb their nuclear ambitions.
And president Donald Trump brokered the Abrahamic wars,
reshaping relations between Israel and much of the
Arab world.
Donald Trump will crack down and take decisive
action against antisemitism
on the streets and college campuses,
restoring
safety and security
for Jewish Americans.
Every college president, I say remove the encampments
immediately,
vanquish the radicals, and take back our campuses
for all of the normal students who want
a safe place
from which to learn.
Donald Trump stands as the most pro Israel
president in US history.
Someone the Jewish community can count on.
When I'm back in the White House, The
United States will stand with Israel
all the way, 100%,
without hesitation,
without qualification,
and without any apology. We're not gonna be
apologizing.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 07/18/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
A lot of what has been discussed over
the last so many years and most in
particular
right before the selection process has undeniably
come to pass. And that's just an important
thing to really take a moment to think
about because a lot of these
a lot of the political back and forth
can be a lot about, you know, theorizing,
kid predictions, discussing what you think may happen.
And rarely do these things happen, like, to
a tee on what's it usually somewhat in
a certain vein of the conversation.
Usually, as usual usually, as usual. Usually, somewhere
in the middle. That's kind of the the
thing people come to see if they begin
to see through the partisan idea, which is
that, you know, both sides are usually giving
you a kind of a car a caricature
of the reality for their own benefit where
it's probably somewhere in the middle. But the
point is to think about a lot of
the things we've been discussing. And I just
I mean, when I say that, I mean,
like, the genuine independent media. Not partisan. I
mean, there there's partisan overlaps, but not blindly
team sport politics
minded, people that are willing to consider objective
truth over their personal interest. The point is
that a lot of this was being discussed.
And I mean, like, whether Donald Trump was
influenced by a certain party, whether outside party,
whether, you know, the techno technocracy would really
show its face in this administration, whether that's
been the long term plan, the AI overlap,
the genetic modification,
gene therapy discussion. You know, I mean, just
it's hard to see. Here's what's actually funny
to me, and this is those of you
that watch this show, you know that this
is not a partisan comment. I see both
sides as equally concerning, equally cartoonish,
And I mean that and I don't mean
that the peoples around them. I mean, the
the the team sport politics, the Republicans and
the Democrats.
But if you look at what they keep
saying and and then the the lackeys, the
sycophants that kind of circle around that and
you know who we're talking about, I don't
see that as even the even close to
the majority right now of conservatives.
But you know the one at the top
of that paradigm that are, you know, anything
I know them. They're my friends. We're part
of the same team. People that are reporters
that are more like fans.
They're the ones that are saying
promises made, promises kept, and going down this.
And I stand back and I look at
this objectively. And you look at the information
about what's happening, and I'm what what actually
has happened that meets these promises?
I mean, even the immigration point.
It it's becoming a I mean, look. And
to be clear again, the Democrats do the
same thing. But right now, we're at a
very interesting tipping point, a dangerous moment for
this country, which both paradigm, both sides have
led us to measure by measure for a
long time. But really take a step back
and recognize how many of the things that
are happening are what a lot of people
were worried were gonna happen and now are,
in fact, coming to pass. And and we're
in an interesting overlap with Epstein conversation exploding
in the into the partisan field, the Israel.
Both these things are fracturing,
I think, largely the partisan conversation, not just
one side of the paradigm.
And it is changing
everything.
And it's an
and in these moments,
bad things can happen for the interest of
trying to drive you back into that sort
of propagandized
numb state that we all a lot of
people can end up in if they're not
paying attention.
But also
very good things can happen.
We can see a massive shift in awareness.
People can start taking different actions. We can
start seeing beyond the petty and partisan division
tactics that make you pit yourself against your
neighbor, your family, your loved ones.
And if we can start leaning into that
mindset and start constantly telling ourselves that we
can you what we go back to in
the very beginning of this platform myself and
what I talk about,
be better.
Every single day, try to just be a
little bit better than yesterday. And then if
you really live that and not just in
a way that, you know, it's not winning,
It's about being a better person and being
better in what you want to be in
this world. And I think that if most
people are coming from I think most people
want good for this country. And if we
aim in that direction without considering the partisan
narratives, I think we'll end up in a
positive place. I think right now, we have
a very
large opportunity
to see that change take place. And so
today, what we're gonna discuss
is how these things kind of work together
and and the and the positive elements as
we go through this. But don't misunderstand.
There's a lot of bad things happening, a
lot of darkness in the world. It's always
there. The problem is that right now, because
of the way things have
there's a lot of factors to include. These
bad evil elements
are, I think, in, like, a death throes
kind of moment. Not like the entirety of
evil in the world, but, like, the ones
we're highlighting
are diminishing, are being seen, are being called
out, are losing influence and power. And as
always, the cornered owl animal analogy,
what we're seeing is more violence, more chaos,
more of them doing anything they can to
either stop the awareness or bring everyone down
with them as they go down. And that's
going to happen.
The point is not to be swayed by
the outrageous narratives and the the scare tactics
about maybe we shouldn't release the Epstein list
because that'll bring down the government. Good. Bring
it down.
Now you can take that as a thousand
different ways you want. You know what I
mean if you watch this show. And I
mean probably what you think in a lot
of ways, but the reality being that that
is a positive thing. Even with all the
negative that might come along with it, we
have to get beyond these broken structures. Now
today, though, again, we will be talking about
the Epstein overlap, Donald Trump, Israel, Gaza,
and an important conversation about Syria and the
Druze population. Some of these things I mentioned
here and there with Charlie Robinson's interview as
well as Brad Miller, we just discussed in
studio yesterday. That went out yesterday.
But it's a very important development that shows
you pretty much most of what we talk
about today, the bigger picture when you look
at it from that angle and understand how
it connects to the the bigger points. But
a lot of important things we're gonna start
with as well. Well, actually, I'm gonna start
with the FC Point, but a lot of
things we're gonna start with outside of what
I'm gonna try to quickly go through around
health as well.
Somebody actually left me a message today about
a gene therapy report that I found that
we're gonna talk about briefly. But overall, just
the the the negative direction of the of
the Maha, not the movement, but the government
element that wants you to think that they
support you, that are pretending to be Maha,
the ones that are lying to you and
continuing to go in the wrong directions. We're
gonna go over all of that and the
different points that are standing out that are
showing you that they are lying to you.
But like I said, outside of all that,
we're gonna start with Epstein today, but not
from a point, like, because to make this
clear,
Epstein's
the story of what that is, the list,
the sexual blackmail, the sexual the the the
trafficking network, the obvious and undeniable connections to
intelligence, clearly, Mossad and Israel and how that's
used, as well as the CIA,
it's obviously a monumental story. But if it's
new to you, it's kind of alarming for
those of us that have been you know,
it's been a mainstream story, and it has
been fleshed out from Whitney's books and different
investigatory. I mean, people have broken this down.
Now it doesn't mean everything's covered.
But to understand what this really is has
been very clear for a long time. The
story is important for reasons that people are
barely even beginning to understand for the larger
picture, eugenics and trans and transhumanism and technocracy,
but also just what it is. But my
point is the story as it stands right
now in the partisan field
is basically unimportant. Now what the reason I'm
saying that is because there right now, this
game that's going on,
we're gonna do a, you know, a grand
jury, or we're gonna hire a to appoint
a prosecutor. Oh, wait. Never mind. Now we're
not gonna do that. Now Bond is gonna
put stuff out. One day, it's a hoax.
The next day, it's complete it's a nothing
burger. Right? No smoking gun. How can you
say that there's a hoax,
and then at the same time tell us
that now we're gonna give it to you
but there's nothing important? Those two things don't
add up. So this is Hasbara. That's why
I frame it that way today. That is
exactly the way Israel conducts propaganda.
I think it stems from a a a
a a belief that you can lie
17 different ways and the establishment will cover
up for you. But that's what we see
every day in this real propaganda. Lie, lie,
lie. Okay. And finally, we'll accept that last
version of the lie. That's what he's doing
right now. My point is the dance and,
you know, the dog and pony show of
about what they're gonna do around Epstein has
kind of eclipsed everything else going on. So
I'm gonna rapidly go through some of the
updates on what I think are important in
that framing, but hopefully do it in two
minutes. Because the reality is this is less
important than the Epstein story itself, what it's
really connected to, and every other thing we're
gonna talk about. And you'll see what I
mean when we go through that. So let's
start
with this
update.
Actually, I'm sorry. I'm not right in the
middle. This this point about just this this
is about the Israel Assad director
today
visiting Washington DC
to seek US help in convincing countries to
accept hundreds of Palestinians. You know? As if
that's not an alarming thing to say in
the first place, that we're gonna ethnically cleanse
and and
forcibly
displace, force these people out of their homes,
and then we're gonna act like we're doing
humanitarian work by petitioning people to help them.
K. That's a whole that's insane in its
own right, And we'll talk about that when
we get to Gaza. Or the idea that
you're talking about bringing in immigrants?
Isn't that exactly what I mean, just none
of this makes any sense. Again, we're talking
about Mossad asking the government, not that the
Trump administration's gonna do it, but we'll see
how that goes. It wouldn't surprise me with
the Afrikaners and so on. My point is
it's probably also a little about Epstein too.
Probably the massage director coming in the middle
of the scandal might not look the best
for them. I just thought that was interesting.
I'm willing to bet you that's absolutely what
that's about, damage control. And I think you
know what I mean. If you don't, pay
attention. We'll go through some of this stuff
today. But I wanted to point this out
too because I thought this was interesting. Did
we put this out on March 2, and
it wasn't because of what we now know
we knew then, but we already saw where
this was going and this was about what
was happening then based on the fact that
they were trying to downplay, push to the
side. But the interesting thing is that's exactly
what ended up happening. The title was, the
Deep Goad State, Epstein List Got Twitter Filed,
and Israel Breaks Ceasefire as Planned.
You'll be forgiven for not knowing where that
last one falls in, seeing as how they
break ceasefires every fifteen seconds.
Epstein list got Twitter filed in March. It's
an interesting thing to write seeing as how
that's where we are, at least for now.
Maybe tomorrow, it'll all break through. We should
always consider that possibility. But I just thought
that was interesting.
Now Adam Cochran
covers this. He's the
the one I believe I saw share this
the first time, but this is another follow-up
from Wired. Metadata from the raw Epstein prison
shows approximately
two minutes and fifty three seconds were removed
from those clips that were stitched together. I
mean, this is just I mean, I don't
know how you can't see this. There's either
one or two things that I can see
in all this. Incompetence, like a shocking level
of
like, what's worse than incompetence? Like, these people,
I don't know how they tie their shoes
in the morning if this is what they're
doing. Secondarily or may or alternatively, that this
is what Israel wants to happen or somebody
else because they want this country to completely
collapse. I don't understand this. I mean, I
could I could wrap my mind around a
world in which, as I think Bruce Fein
pointed out, that we've been from administration to
administration. And I think that's because of Zionism,
quite frankly, but regardless, whatever's causing it, from
administration to administration,
we've watched them get worse and worse. And
the people that care and the people that
have insight
are insightful,
who have technical knowledge, who understand politics, just
go, I don't want anything to do with
that clown show, and they stop going in.
Now in a way,
I mean, I'm very I hate politics in
general. But if it has to exist, then
we should want people to care and know
what they're talking about, and we should be
able to sift through all that. The point
is that we've seen that go the other
direction. So maybe they are this stupid. Maybe
they are this incompetent and someone else is
taking advantage of that, and maybe both are
happening. But my god, as I simply said,
this is the video the Trump admin reviewed
and released and took a long time to
do it. There's no hiding from this. There
is no pretending they did not know this
or otherwise if if you are, then that
means they're insanely incompetent, and that is alarming
in its own right because of what I
think is happening. Now, a man who served
in the same jail cell as Epstein says
there's no way he was able to kill
himself. Well, you heard that from anybody with
know how, anybody that did an investigation, anyone
who read about the prison because that's how
those prison cells were designed. But what's interesting
is that it's just coming back up. It
would have been impossible unless somebody gave him
something to do it with, allowed him to
do it himself, did it to him, or
left, took him somewhere else, and pretended it
happened. I mean, these are things we should
genuinely be considering, and we were when this
was first being covered. That's why this is
not a shocking story for a lot of
us. But this is a new one from
today. Donald Trump's ex chief of staff has
now said that he is in fact in
the prison in the Epstein files.
It was Mick Mulvaney. Now, yes, as always,
the closest people in his team seem to
later be the biggest enemy, and now we
can't trust him. He's a rhino. Well,
at one point, he was in the team,
so it's worth considering
what he's saying.
But that could all be part of the
ploy. I think if you want my honest
opinion, just my opinion, I think it's obvious
that he's involved in this. I think it's
obvious he, like all the rest of them,
which aren't unique to the partisan side, are
either taken advantage of by this outside entity
or are just that disgusting and they're in
these lists because they are. I I I
it's not about one side or the other.
I think these people are all in these
positions for a certain reason. Now I will
play this. This is
oh, I think I forgot to grab this.
This is a clip.
Show you this since we're on this page.
Make it quick. This is a clip that
you've already seen most likely of Donald Trump
just reiterating that this is a hoax. And
I'm gonna read something after that to make
this quick, and I I really wanna make
this minute. So let me go through this
quickly as possible. Here is what she's saying
or Donald Trump is saying next to Carrie
Anne,
Caroline Levitt
about it being a hoax. Now remember, right
before this, the point was that this was
where was that?
Oh, there it is. I got it right
here. That this is
you know, at first, it was something that
wasn't there, then it became something that was
at least and then you have the people
in the middle saying, is the deep state
tricking him? Are they blackmailing him? That was
Jones from day to day. One day, he's
being blackmailed, but the the tape that's missing
a minute. The next day, Trump's using it
to blackmail the deep state. Then it became
it's a hoax. Now it became that, I
guess, that's that Jones seemed to think that
he's working for Mossad or he's considering that.
It's just so funny to me to watch
the evolution that good. I hope he wakes
up to all of it even though I
don't think he's honest. I don't think there's
a wake up in process. I think he's
trying to play you into something else. But,
you know, maybe I'm wrong. Consider it. The
crazy part, though,
I was gonna talk about it at the
end. Hold on. I jumped
ahead. Is that you evolved to this to
saying it's a hoax, and now we're gonna
go to next is what Trump is telling
you, which now challenges that statement. This is
the Hasbara point I'm making. But in case
you missed it, he is calling he was
calling this a hoax. The attorney general briefed
you
on the DOJ and FBI review, the findings
of that review. The attorney general briefed you
on On what? On the,
say and FBI review on what? On
On Epstein. On the review of the file,
the attorney general came by and she's on
that. A very very quick briefing. Did did
did she tell you what did she hook
up with you? And specifically, did she tell
you
name appeared in the file in the No.
No. She's,
she's given us
just a very quick briefing.
And in terms of the credibility of the
different things that they've seen,
and I would say that, you know, these
files were made up by Comey.
They were made up by Obama. They were
made up by the Biden inform you know?
We and we went through years of that
with the And, of course, Russia Russia hoax.
Right? Which was. And we all know that.
Literally, everybody everywhere with the brain knows they
made that up. So now they're just trying
to pull this back in and say, look,
the Democrats lie about everything. Guess what? They
both lie, lie, every side lies about everything.
That's what they do. We're finally starting to
see that right now. But so think about
how insane that is to argue that this
is fake.
After everything you've been saying, how can it
be fake if you've been putting if Bondi
actually, I'm I'll just read what he said
right here. First, it's this one here, I
think. Yeah. I'm what five times August wrote
was really good. It really just make it
seem as dumb as it really is. But
Glenn says, what is in the Epstein documents
that's causing Trump now to insist over and
over that they're forged in fake documents fabricated
by Comey, Obama, Hillary, and Biden? And they
even got fact checked on here. The first
federal investigation at Epstein was launched, because he
goes on to talk about it, and closed
under George w Bush. A new federal investigation
was launched in 2019 under Trump after Epstein
was arrested
on on sex trafficking charges afterward. Trump died
or excuse me. Epstein died, they claim, in
August 2019 prior to Biden. So the point,
clearly,
is that he's trying to continue to tell
you it's a hoax after telling you that
more was gonna be coming out. And I
said the only people now pushing this, and
it was Jones and Johnson and the rest
of them until they shifted again,
are blind followers or opportunists.
Remember who they are. Also be skeptical of
those who suddenly see the light when it's
been obvious for a long time. Hope they
have changed.
Right? Hope they've changed. Give them that opportunity,
but question it the same until they prove
out over a long period of time. That's
my point right now. With a Tucker or
a Jones, sure. I genuinely want that to
happen. As much as people will still probably
decide, oh, he's not telling yes. I want
that. Why wouldn't I? I think I've proved
over the years that it's about the outcome
and the truth for me over anything else.
But why would we take it now after
I mean, realize what even with Trump. He
just lied to you blatantly about six times
in a row about this story. Now let's
say tomorrow, they break out with all the
files.
Why even if it's the truth, wouldn't you
go, well, hold on. You just tried to
deceive us really clearly
and then gave us the truth.
Either way, you're dishonest. That you have to
be real about that.
So Trump calls Epstein hoax a or conspiracy
a hoax, his own words, by the way,
in another discussion, and turns on MAGA. Now
this was the in between part. This is
from the sixteenth. It's the eighteenth today.
Two days ago, Trump called MAGA people, Republicans,
conservatives, who were simply going, I care about
the Epstein files. You know why? Because Trump
told them to. Or may because they do.
My point is Trump was the one that
made this a point, and he calls them
weaklings,
literally.
Trump lashed out at his own supporters, calling
them gullible weaklings for questioning the transparency of
the secret government inquiry into
the Jeff Draftstein point. Now, again, the we're
gonna come to the point of what they're
doing with Bondi right now. Why in the
world, after what they just did in front
of you, would you then trust what Bondi
and Trump roll out for you? Especially as
they're seemingly trying to control this in that
way.
Let these weaklings continue forward and do do
the and and do the Democrats' work. See
how lazy that is? Peep blind sycophant followers
will go, oh, Democrats do it? Then the
opposite, good. That's their mindset. And that's or
just don't care. And whatever Trump says, I
support because I'm a follower.
Insane. He's he could insult his base,
and some of them and the and the
high up followers don't care. But as most
of us paying attention can see, it is
beginning to deteriorate because of things like that.
Elon Musk pokes holes in Trump's hoax claim
about the Epstein files, saying, wow. Amazing that
Epstein killed himself and Ghislaine is in federal
prison for a hoax.
It doesn't make any sense, guys. It doesn't
make any sense. DOJ, of course, urging the
Supreme Court to turn away from, Epstein or,
Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, which, remember, this is an
interesting development. I here's what I read on
this. Donald Trump clumsily puts out the idea
it's a hoax because I think they're reactive
and they're not really doing their they're not
thinking this through.
But saying it's a hoax then opens the
door for dis Ghislaine Maxwell to say, well,
if it's a hoax, then why am I
in jail for trafficking?
See? And so now her lawyers are going,
bing. We're jumping on this, and they are.
And they're pushing for an appeal. The DOJ
is going, no. We're not we but it
it may happen. Or there's a behind the
scenes conversation that gets her out of jail
and then nothing comes out anyway. Right? That's
what I see is happening. Or maybe this
is being thrown at him because of some
Zionist thing. But, obviously,
this is not what we're being told. It
is shockingly
obvious.
Trump floats appointed a pointing a special prosecutor
to put Epstein hoax to bed forever because
of his duped supporters.
And then almost within less than twenty four
hours, nah. We were not gonna do that.
Trump won't appoint a prosecutor.
White House DOJ did exhaustive and thorough review.
Right? So they they throw the bone because
they go, see, all day, all the supporters
were going, we knew it, prosecutor. GC Draino
said, boom. There it is. It's all gonna
change. Then not even twenty four hours later,
they're like, well, never mind. We already did
an exhaustive thorough review. Who didn't see that
coming? Our job was already done well, so
shut up. Well, you've been lying about the
whole thing, and we all know you're lying
now, so why would anybody follow this?
Here he is. And here we go, as
Trump says, based on the ridiculous amount of
publicity given to Epstein. Ridiculous amount of publicity?
This is just insulting to anybody with a
brain.
He says I have Pam Bondi.
I'll have her produce all pertinent information to
grand jury testimony subject to court approval.
There's so many holes in that and so
many easy ways for them to maneuver around
this the same way they are now. It's
one more process. You know, even just like
from congress, where they're gonna discuss this as,
well, we'll do a a investigation and we'll
go through it all. Do you when does
that ever benefit America, guys? Very few times,
but there have been times have I seen
that come to where we have new information
and people go to jail.
I mean, for crying out loud, Clinton got
they those two guys from Boston throw they
destroyed their pay for pay to play dynamic.
They nailed it down to the wall with
documents and proof.
Did Clinton go to jail? No. And that
was when they wanted her. They were going,
Porter it's just so clear that the government
on both sides doesn't really care when it
comes down to their job, their paycheck, and
whoever influences them. But here we go. DC
Drainer will jump to the next thing they
say. But here is a member of congress,
representative Anna Paulina Luna. Thank you, Bondi. While
others are busy trying to knife the president
or just, you know, care about the truth,
this was quietly in the works behind the
scenes. Oh, was it? Are we we really
gonna pretend that this was always happening and
he only just now told you as a
reactive point to shut you up about calling
it out, but somehow they were always gonna
do this, but they didn't tell you in
the beginning when it would have saved him
all this strife? These people are bad at
lying, guys. He goes, I can't she goes,
I can say with full confidence this is
the most transparent administration in history, says one
of the APEC funded liars.
Now the real question, will any reporters finally
cover the FBI destruction of Epstein evidence under
the Biden ministry? You mean, the thing that
nobody has evidence for? That you guys all
just scream and hope that people like One
America News Network and others just go, yeah.
That's the fact, which is probably already happening?
Or people like Jones and the rest just
tell you that? Guess what they say? Enjoy
phase three.
Phase three?
Wait. Did we ever see phase two? What
happened to the phase two binders? I only
saw a phase one binder, which, by the
way, didn't change the story, and people like
Drano and the rest pretended that god. Mike,
this is embarrassing.
And microaggression
or rather Charlie Robinson says, phase two, electric
boogaloo.
That's when you bend over as far as
you can and stick your entire head up
your ass.
Phase three, she's saying.
Here's what five times August said. He goes,
so I follow. Just so we follow.
Trump knew Epstein
but kicked him out of his club for
his behavior, but he never went to the
island. But he understands that very bad things
went on there, and this is what he
said, by the way, and in 2019,
said that we need to find out if
Bill went there to the island because it'll
tell us a lot about the situation, you
know, because bad things are happening. But anyone
who wants to keep the story going now
is a bad person and a weakling because
the story is actually made up, boring, and
there's nothing there at all even though Bondi
said they received truckloads of files. And there
were over 500 250 victims,
but that's Obama, Biden, and Clinton, and Comey
that made it all up. And it's actually
a complete hoax,
but now there's gonna be an unsealed grand
jury testimony even though it's apparently all made
up. Is that the story so far? Just
so we're all on the same page.
You see my guys, there's in my opinion
right now, there is no we are seeing
the divide of the people that have a
brain,
honesty at all, and those that are revealing
themselves to be complete dishonest manipulators.
And by the way and, again, I hope
I'm wrong. I know people will tell me
I'm wrong. That's why I think Jones and
the rest are starting to so go, oh,
hey. Where's your facade? You know, Trump is
messing this whole thing up, and they're actually
meanwhile, constantly and subtly keeping the go the
train going while telling you there's probably a
reason you should support him and why he'll
keep the good things going. He's gonna save
America, but maybe he's the antichrist. I don't
know.
It's just so it's ridiculous.
But I'll have hope like anytime I keep
that, you know, I want to see the
good things happen, but my god.
Now
here now clearly, we've gone over the time
I wanted, but that's how we do this,
I guess.
I can't not bring thoughts up when they
come to mind. Trump suggests there's no smoking
gun in the files. That is four hours
ago. So it's gone from hoax to, well,
there's nothing important in there.
Well, but if it's a hoax, then it
what? It this is how it keeps going.
Donald Trump. If there was a smoking gun
on Epstein, why didn't the Dems who control
the files for years put it out? Okay.
Why didn't you do it, Trump, in your
last administration?
Same point. But here's the real point, and
the only reason that it actually makes sense,
but it's my opinion, because they're all guilty.
Because they're all on the list, or because
they're all working together. I mean, there's a
thousand ways to make that make sense, but
Trump is putting this out on the eighteenth
today because that's what they keep screaming.
Posobiec and the rest, they all keep doing
it. It's the same thing. He came out
again yesterday and said that the Trump filed
Trump was in the files. Why didn't they
release it? You go go look at their
accounts. They've said this almost every day for
the last week. Like, it's some new thought.
No. They're just propagandizing
you with an idea that you can easily
break down. Read the comments. Because they're all
on the list. Because they're all working together.
People aren't buying it anymore.
But he wants you to think that. Only
they lied because they had nothing.
But then why was it important that Clinton
was there? You see how dumb this is?
But, of course, Pauline Luna goes, yay.
Whatever that, you know, bullhorn,
what he said. Fanny Johnson, bull's eye
on this dumb thought that everyone should laugh
at because it's obviously not a sound theory.
And then
this you points out some of the people
trying to gaslight. Here's Tim Pool going,
oh, first, you saw this one. He goes,
absolutely insane that Democrats actually voted to have
the US government publish child porn. What the
f is going on anymore? And, of course,
even f Facebook says or Twitter.
Representing the vote as publishing child porn is
intentionally misleading because that's what they do. That's
their job. But, of course, before that, in
February, he said, Pam Bonny just said the
absentee list is on her desk. Release the
list and expose the criminals. Okay. By that
logic, you just called for child porn. Right?
But they're dishonest partisan manipulators.
This is you calling him out. Here,
Tim Pool says absolutely ins oh, that's the
same one.
Oh, that's right. I found the other one
from that. And then
David Icke says, that's how the agarists calls
out Jones saying, Alex Jones believes Trump's being
patrolled by massaged blackmail.
Wow. So brave of you to finally come
to that logical point, even though I will
be argue just like as much as I
would report that as my opinion because I
can't prove definitively that's happening. See, that's honest
reporting. But I've shown you the evidence for
the last fifteen years or probably less than
that, but for a long period of time.
Others have been doing it much, much longer
than that, and we've had on the show,
talking about the reality of all of this,
of Epstein, of these US government connection to
Zionism,
Mossad infiltration. Right? But now because his base
is the one saying, for the last week,
you look like a moron. How are you
defending this? So they subtly pull into it.
But while, mark my words, still pulling punches
for Trump everywhere they can. David Icke says
this is so obvious and has been for
years and years that you wonder how it
took him so long to see this blatant.
But that's the point. I think he's always
seen it. He goes, my sources say you
need people to tell you when it has
been staring you in the face all this
time, but Trump doesn't need much encouragement to
do whatever Israel wants. He's been owned by
an ultra Zionist much of his life. I
agree with that. And it's not him. He's
covering for people. He's covering for himself and
others' benefit. How desperate the MAGA media are
to get back on board with Trump. Much
of their audience
is still not having it.
Then you've got this person I've never seen
before.
I just happened to see this today. Almost
a 100,000 followers. You can watch the video.
It's nine minutes. Says Trump didn't betray his
base
because that's what obviously is going on. He
called its bluff.
Wait. So you mean the MAGA base is
now the responsible party? They were the ones
he called their bluff?
I don't think this is going to age
well. And it says these people don't want
justice.
They want content. So now you're attacking your
own base? I mean, think about how wild
this is. This shows you something important, I
think. She's saying they the MAGA people that
got them there, Trump in that position, if
you wanna believe the narrative anyway, but that's
the the momentum anyway,
that they don't want justice. They're they're the
only ones at this point calling for justice.
And it says they'd rather have something to
be angry about than something that actually works.
I don't even know where you're going with
that at this point. The reality is this
is obvious to me. What's going on is
the and it's not just Trump. It's the
US government
betraying its people.
She goes, so let's talk about the noisy
former supporters, the pitchforged, and this is the
the Panikins.
I mean, what a wait. If you if
you're gonna win the day for the dumbest
effort, Panikins, that's not even a good term.
I think it means, like, panic Americans, I
guess, that Trump put out that he's forcing
into the conversation that only real blind followers
are using because it's dumb. It's I think
somebody called it a boomer term. It's a
stupid term. It doesn't even make much sense.
It's not even a clever,
what do you call it? A juxtaposition. It's
not.
But people are out in force trying hard.
Here's Paul Paulina Luna again
saying phase three, which I had over there.
I just kinda threw this together. Sorry. Phase
three. This was the point about the picture
of them just presenting themselves as, well, this
seems to be suddenly like a new presentation.
Now they're the ones on the team, and
we're fine. My point is this.
Actually, this. Well, I'll show you after the
sorry. I'm jumping ahead. I'm trying to do
this quick. She said, why hasn't a single
media outlet asked me to discuss my investigation
into the Epstein file destruction?
Because there's not evidence.
Everyone knows this. You guys are screening a
narrative just like you do with the auto
pen, and certainly possible. I wouldn't even deny
that's possible because, obviously, Biden was senile. But
there's no evidence to back up that anybody
else did it. If you have it, show
it to me. I'll talk about it. The
point is the same here. I thought it
was funny. This person says, Grok, was she
in was was Luna directly involved in the
at in in the at, involved at DOJ
or FBI to be a witness for the
media? And she says no. Or Grock says
no. Was not directly involved. She has no
insight.
These peep these peep and this is what
I want this is the real point that
I'm trying to make with her. She put
this out saying, please don't show this to
Wall Street Journal. It's a hand sketch. They
may think I'm a sex trafficker because you
probably saw this going out.
This is what I really think is happening
right now. Trump seems to surround himself with
the dumbest people in the room.
More accurately,
the only ones left who are either too
stupid or too corrupt to realize how obvious
all this is. What I mean, think about
how how clear this is to even his
base right now, and you get people like
Luna that flock to be by his side
because anybody with a brain's going, I'm gonna
distance myself right now. That's how I feel
it
anyway. Day centered news says more from Luna,
the newly appointed head of the task force
on declassification of federal secrets. Here she is
going, Hamas savages are beheading babies. Here she
is saying, I'm sick to my stomach because
I just heard of a report where a
baby is put in an oven.
You know, lies. All lies with no evidence
to back them up, but she still says
them. Here she is, BD in the house.
She's starting to get it. The APAC funded
Luna. Here's the team.
Here she is right here. A APAC tracker
or track APAC. I mean, there these people
are making hundreds of thousands of dollars from
APAC.
This is an Epstein or, Epstein or Wall
Street Journal article that came out. Jeffrey Epstein's
friend sent him body letters for her fiftieth
birthday album. One of them was Donald Trump.
He disputes it. Does it surprise anybody? He's
now suing Wall Street Journal.
They claim they can back it up. Well,
I guess we'll find out.
We know they know each other. There's a
picture right there. They've met each other. You
see them laughing on film. There's plenty of
overlap. The fact that he sent him a
a body letter, it doesn't surprise wouldn't surprise
me at all. But they're gonna push back,
which I think shows weakness.
Mario Narfel says Randy Fine moves to cancel
the house subscription to the Wall Street Journal
after the Epstein story. Gee, Randy Fine. That
that doesn't line up at all. I mean,
my god. These people there the Wall Street
Journal puts out an article about the problem
that they want you not to think about,
and he goes this far. Guys, you're showing
weakness. You're showing desperation.
And to lend to end this, Trump's name
was a red flag for FBI and review
Epstein files ordered by Pam Bondi. Top Democrat
reveals, so I'm sure per team sport Republicans
will flatly re disregard it without any investigation,
which you should
question it,
but engage with it. Senate Democrats are asking
in a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi
about the FBI review of Epstein files, specifically
why it took an additional three months to
release a memorandum
on the findings and why agents were instructed,
which it does appear to be the case,
to flag any mention of Donald Trump.
I mean, you obviously could answer just politics.
Even if he's not involved, it was gonna
he knows it'll be used against him, so
it would make sense. But it says Trump
has instructed Bondi to release pertinent files on
the criminal investigation to Epstein. So what if
they don't feel that his mention is pertinent?
You see, it's so easy to see how
this goes. And it's left and right. It's
your government. This is how they operate.
Subject to court approval, which is obviously another
issue they can play, Bondi said the justice
department is, quote, ready to move the court
tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts. Does
anybody actually think this is gonna shift? I
certainly hope it does.
And and just to be clear, if this
came out tomorrow and the evidence, like, spectacularly
they just it just proved that Trump's right
about everything, I'd happily report that.
It it it there's no point has anything
been stated that we can't. The reality is
the evidence isn't there. What we have is
pretty clear. He's been lying regardless of whether
it turns out that he's not involved. He's
been lying. The question is why.
My point is we should want the truth,
whatever it shows. You know as well as
I, the people on both sides of this
paradigm don't think that way. The reality though
is I don't think we're gonna get anything
else or it's gonna be a same, you
know, here's phase one. Is that everything? You
guys done? Have we have we put you
back to bed? Can we move on? No.
We didn't buy it. Oh, now there's another
story. That's what I think it'll be. Sadly,
they've shown you that. But it says, a
bombshell report by the Wall Street Journal reveals
Trump's name along with a body message and
doodle among an album of letters celebrating Epstein's
birthday. That's where that doodle's about. That it
it was, like, a body drawing of a
of a girl, I guess. And it says,
Trump has denied that the drawing or letter
was his doing and announced he plans to
sue them, and that's where we are.
I thought this was just interesting. I'm seeing
this from people in this kind of, like,
you know,
partisan field. I get that they don't see
themselves that way. Claire Russell says, I don't
know how to do it without infuriating Trump
beyond belief. But
if JD Vance has any hope of twenty
eight twenty twenty eight, he's going to need
to distance himself from the Epstein debacle.
And, no, I don't mean campaigning on justice
in 2028.
I mean, you need to tell the truth
now while it's needed. Why are we even
talking about JD Vance as a future candidate?
Doesn't feel very libertarian of me or anybody
to be talking about one, I mean, another
status president, quite frankly. But on top of
the idea that we this is
isn't the I mean, isn't the whole point
about Palantir and the infiltration of that conversation
and JD Vance being sort of a venture
and can I mean, it's just weird to
me that this is,
I guess, the larger point? People that profess
to be outside of the paradigm to see
through the two party illusion many times in
the past on interview with me, talking about
the idea that we need to make sure
JD Vance it just feels wrong to me.
And I think a lot of people, honest
or not, have been pulled back into this
for a litany of reasons. We should be
smarter than this, and we need to stop
being pulled in to this idea.
Now let's get into what I think is
the real important step today.
Took way too long to do that, unfortunately,
but we got plenty to get to. So
I wanna start on this.
Bring up the screen share for you with
a conversation
about my past interviews and some AI overlap
that I think is important.
So
I had a great interview with Brad Miller.
I both see, we brought this up on
the interview, actually. I feel I feel like
he's right. I feel like we've had three
interviews. I could only find two for some
reason. It's certainly possible that I didn't tag
it properly, but then it should still pop
up with Brad Miller. Anyway, he also thought
we had had two before this, but I
included I mean, three before this. There were
two that I had on the show. This
is supposed to be either our third or
our fourth. Brad Miller interview, military accountability, and
the greater Israel war and the technocracy transition.
It was a really great conversation. We spent
a really good, period of time
in the beginning talking about the the two
party illusion, the military account declaration of accountability
that that, you know, there was a lot
of hope that Trump's new administration would do
or, you know,
positively
change the reality of this country and the
military, and he's meant and they don't think
that. I mean, it's there's a lot of
multifaceted opinions, but, like, collectively, the argument is
right now, the things they were worried about,
the things they were calling out in that
does not seem to be changing. In fact,
it continues to seem to get worse. And
people that see through the two party illusion
recognize that's always how it seems to go
because it's about one thing, the US government
not caring about US interests or American interests.
But it's a great discussion, and I highly
recommend you check it out.
But we go on
to talk about one part that I thought
was very relevant that I just wanted to
make sure that you didn't miss, which was
about the not the whole conversation. If you
want the main conversation, I do think this
will come to play, and I think this
is gonna be an important conversation
going forward. I mean, simply for the podcast,
weather manipulation for AI. And that's not really
the the main point is water usage in
these AI data centers and how in the
world they think they can get beyond that
that choke point. It's I see. It seems
to be shockingly unsustainable. So the question is,
is there an effort for more, because it
already is happening, weather modification
for AI to cause rain, and all of
a sudden, we're having record rainfall and floods
all over the country. It is worth your
consideration. It's hard to deny. But that's just
the conversation I had about this on July
7.
Now I I also included
this. We talked about this. That's why I'm
bringing it up with Brad. I just pointed
it out. Or I think this one was
a Charlie, actually. We went to the town
Elon Musk is poisoning.
This was oh, yeah. I'm sorry. I'm conflating
the two interviews. Brad, I discussed in the
beginning. The one that I just mentioned about
the AI point was actually with this interview
with Charlie Robinson. And we do this periodically.
We try to do it every month. Simply,
what the hell is happening? Kinda get caught
up in all the madness, and we talk
about this point in this interview. And I'm
not gonna play this, but it's worth watching.
What the town I believe it's in Texas.
It is in Texas. That's we went to
the town Elon Musk is poisoning, and it
talks about how there's, you know, water issues
and all sorts of things. It's happening all
over the place. There's a New York Times
article about a woman next to a metastatic
center that
all sorts of ill health issues. Their water's
coming out brown. You know, this is happening
all over the country in the world, really.
And so it's worth understanding what it's doing
to your community as they, I mean, intensively
ramp this up.
So my point is just to make sure
you're not missing that stuff. Check it out.
We talk about it in this interview with
Charlie.
We also talk about the fact that if
you didn't if you missed this, the alarming
reality that Israel is now associated with The
United States and a strategic a strategic partnership
for all things artificial intelligence.
And that terrifies me. The idea that now
Israel has, as he writes right here, don't
forget, they just signed a policy to consolidate
all of the data on all Americans.
And now Israel will have access to all
of this. And I argue they largely already
have, but this is a bigger problem.
So with everything I ever talking about, just
recognize
that Israel has a hand in it right
now. I mean, even just the fact that
they're openly committing genocide in multiple nations, which
is I'm calling the greater Israel genocide, is
enough to have a concern about this.
Or that they're war criminals. But there's so
much more to get to with the espionage,
the blackmail.
That's what this really comes down to. And
I said, this is what we have been
warning about long before this partnership,
right in front of your eyes with a
barely passable narrative. Now
Business Insider also reported the Pentagon is about
to start using XAI.
AI, it is the same that is the
large I think that's the primary AI at
this point.
Their AI is GROC
and other federal agencies. So now you're getting
this AI XAI overlap that's gonna be used
throughout the military field and that's overlap with
Israel. Doesn't that concern anybody?
This is one of the most alarming points
for me with the Israel infiltration because of
what's going on and hasn't seem to be
getting a lot of reach. Course, don't forget
that x is XAI at this point. So
not just the military, but all of I
mean, it's like the data's already there, but
just recognize all of the social, social media
aspect as well. It's a much bigger thing
that's happening. Now Elon Musk spent months slashing
federal contracts, Fortune reports, but now his AI
company is celebrating a $200,000,000
Pentagon contract
and a new unit to get government business.
Right? The the the guy that was gonna
be saving us all this money. Right? Do
we not realize by now the whole Doge
tap dance was a clear deception? I mean,
it was obvious while it was happening, if
we haven't caught up to that by now.
I think at this point, Doge or rather
whatever agenda was happening, they got what they
wanted from the illusion. They got your information.
They allow Americans were blinded by what was
happening, and they allowed or whether we could
stop them or not.
We, by compliance, allowed them to remove the
siloed information, jam it all together,
get access to it to train their AI
models. XAI and OpenAI and Palantir, everybody else,
they're now using that to kill people in
Israel, in Gaza.
And they got it, and now he's done.
Now I'm sure there's probably much more, but
think about how clear that is. He just
steps away, pulls himself out of this, and
now they're running, sprinting forward with the AI
direction, building AI data centers. I mean, I
think that's really what this was about. And
now not only is he getting $200,000,000
for the contract, it's clearly not about saving
money, but he is sprinting in this direction.
What happened to everything else? What happened to
the Doge mission? What happened yeah. I guess
we'll just forget about that and move on.
Don't you know it was all a big
hoax? That's what I expect tomorrow. Hillsborough woman
conned out of $15,000
after AI clones daughter's voice. It's just an
insight into where the world is going, and
there is in no way an effort to
protect you from where this is going. I
want that to be I mean, I think
that's by design.
I worry about this stuff. Deepfakes, the whole
thing. In fact, I forgot about that.
Damn. I I feel like I'm I can't
I'm not gonna try to find it. I
don't even know where to go with this
right now, but there was a another big
deepfake that came out. If you remember what
that was in the chat, let me know.
I pulled it aside. I think I misplaced
it. I think it was an important one.
But that's all I can remember right now.
It's just this fuzzy mem memory of, like,
a couple days ago, there being a deep
fake of somebody that was important. But, you
know, it's the same thing. I just wanna
make sure we see that that is I
still think that a larger shoe is gonna
drop and whatever that means and how it's
gonna be used and when that big one
comes. Maybe it's gonna be an Epstein thing.
That's what we were I mean, we're we're
kinda getting there right now. But the the
video they put out,
they got caught lying about it, guys. They
manipulated
that video. At the very least, stitched pieces
together. But how do we know they didn't
just alter other things?
Now, on the AI point, this is Noah
Harari.
And I think it's important to understand where
the world is going in this direction. Now,
couple quick points on this, then we're gonna
get into some other we're gonna then get
into the some health points, then we're gonna
talk about The United States
citizenship and finish on US foreign policy. But
this is important, just quickly, to understand. There's
another Oracle video I'm gonna play as well
that just really lays this out on where
and, again, this is not the conspiratorial version.
This is what they have written down in
their documents. It's about what they want to
build. Of course, they frame it as for
your safety, right, for your convenience.
But those things are just the way you
frame it. It's about control. And if you
think that control is helpful and convenient, then
you're on board. But if you recognize that
control is just control that can be used
in any different way, then then hopefully you
recognize that it's about who uses it.
The intention behind who's using it, and I
think that's the biggest issue. Here you go.
Could AIs
have the ability
to open a bank account and manage
a bank account? That's a very practical question.
We are very close to the point
when you can tell an AI,
go out there,
make money. Your goal is to make a
billion dollar. And one of the things about
money
I think that's already happening. With people that
have the ability to do it and the
legal avenues to get not have any repercussions
for it. I'm willing to bet you the
people at the highest levels have been doing
that for a while. It's a very
easy goal to define. And AI can make
money in many ways. It can hire its
services
to people to write their essays or books
or whatever. Many, many things it can do.
Which we know is happening. And I'm willing
to bet you that there are far far
more prominent people than you realize that have
been passing that off as their own work.
Bet you anything.
It can earn money. It can then invest
this money in the stock exchange. So do
we, as a society,
want to
allow AI agents
to open bank accounts and manage them in
any way they see fit? And then this
is not a question for fifty years. This
is a question for five years, maybe one
year.
And that's what's scary.
It's now, guys. It's happening.
So
it's not some distant future. Right? This is
what they're building you into.
So here
is David Icke talking about the rather Jason
Basler. David Icke commenting about the CBDC, the
genius bill. Jason Basler says, I don't care
how convenient they claim it is or how
many times they say it'll monetize
or modernize, excuse me, the financial system. Once
they control and that's a perfect example, right,
of
using a problem to justify the the build
back better. You know? Right? The reimagining.
And they go, well, because we all agree
the system's broken. But they leave it that
way. They use that problem to then go,
here. We'll fix it with this. And most
people may not recognize that was always what
they wanted. He says once they control programmable
money, they control your speech, your movement, your
life. It isn't innovation. It's a digital cage.
And this is where we all see it
going.
Right? The idea
whether the best way to frame this is
that whether it is a stablecoin
version of a CBDC or a CBDC exactly
as we've discussed it. And realize the stablecoin
version is far worse, as we've discussed with
Catherine Austin Fitts and plenty of others well
knowledged on well knowledgeable of the topic of
what these can do, that that's the far
worst reality.
The point, though, is that they need
this aspect of it to create
what he just described. What Harari was just
describing, this has to happen first.
And it could very well be simultaneous, but
realize and what I was saying before,
the reason I described it that way is
because right now, without this kind of overlap,
there's all sorts of kind of boundaries and
legal realities that I think don't wouldn't would
make it illegal to do with, like, an
AI
bot out there, like, running some kind of
job or selling things. I bet I'm I
pointed that I bet you people are doing
it that have power to circumvent those things.
But once we get to this point,
I don't see how this doesn't explode, and
I think that's what we're worried about. David
Icke said Trump couldn't call programmable programmable money
a central bank digital currency because his base
would have been furious. So he calls it
stablecoins.
Now it's not the best way to frame
that because I think stablecoins are very different
and they do exist, but that's what he's
pointing to and claiming it's just, you know,
a stablecoin when what they're doing is not
just a stablecoin, but which is the point
he's making. I just think it could have
been written in a way that the average
person might understand better. But the reality
is exactly where we've always I mean, David
Iceman calling, all of us have. And he
says, anyone tired of winning yet?
Thomas Massie point says they blocked consideration of
his amendment to the Clarity Act, which would
have prohibited
central bank digital currencies as well.
So they're making sure that they don't aren't
restricted as from a government standpoint. Marjorie Taylor
Greene
was pointing the same thing out. The House
is voting on the Genius Act, which has
passed.
Here's Nick's order.
Breaking. The House has officially passed the Genius
Act, a crypto bill backed by Donald Trump
and Scott Bissett, two flaming Zionists.
All it needs now is president Trump's signature.
Yay.
It says, yay for whatever Trump just told
us to cheer for. Three cheers for the
current thing.
I mean, come on, guys. Nick Sorter was
calling out this thing with CBDCs before. It's
just it's this is the same point as
always. These people will cheer for their own
I mean, you could make it as extreme,
as dark as you want. It's just like
it's like whatever they just said, yay, is
what we keep seeing. And it is insane,
but
you know why it happens.
Now here's a clip I played. I think
it was with Charlie Robinson, but I wanna
make sure you see this. It's only a
minute and a half.
But the geofencing
part is what I think is really, you
know
and it all of it all of it's
important, but the geofencing part of it is
what I think will come as they build
out the infrastructure. And the idea is being
able to just you know, you're you pass
it through this visible invisible barrier,
you know, your credit cards turn off, or
rather, you know, whatever. Your your digital currency
doesn't work. Your your your everything. You did
your it's it's the idea of being debanked
or depersoned. That's what that becomes.
And this is not maybe is where the
world is going. And, you know, if unless
we do something about it.
In the long term, the plan is to
pretty much lock up humanity
in smart cities,
which is kind of a superset of a
fifteen minute city.
They've sold all the state and local governments
and countries
that smart cities are about sustainability
and the good of the city. So here
here is what's actually funny to me. So
you can't call it fifteen minutes cities because
that would upset the base in in the
Republican side. Because my point is they're doing
the same thing. Build back better, big beautiful
bill. You know, it's the same it's the
same it's technocracy. It's the same agenda.
He Even when he spoke at Davos, for
crying out loud, guys, they're all on the
same path,
but you gotta do something different. Right? Different
names. Stablecoins, CBDC. Right?
But what's funny is
smart city, which is what you're seeing a
lot used right now, is almost just as
bad, especially because he has described it
as I mean, it would be seen as,
you know, woke and Democrat from the side
of people that only see it that way.
My point is it's happening either way, and
the Trump administration is the one behind it.
Or you overlap the point with,
freedom cities,
The technocracy as the Prospera in Honduras than
what they're doing in in El Salvador, not
the immigration part, but what they're doing with
the country.
These are test these are models for where
this is going.
But in reality, the language from the UN
and WEF and their white papers is all
inverted.
So
air monitoring is really about limiting mobility and
no car ownership.
Right? Surveillance
controlled via LED grid is why the smart
lighting is there.
Water management is about water rationing. Noise pollution
is about speech surveillance.
Traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility.
And then, of course, energy
conservation is all about
rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline.
Another concept
one should be familiar with is called geofencing,
and that's think of it as an invisible
fence around you
where you cannot go beyond a certain point,
and that will be related to your face
recognition, digital identity, and access control.
Now here's a way to overlap this because
you might be having a person out there
thinking, well, Trump does we'll never do that.
That's only the democrat. Okay. Well, let's say
for sake of conversation, we start talking about,
I don't know, an immigration issue. What if
they start claiming that Iran sent it a
bunch of sleeper cells or any number of
things? We had a surge through the one
the, you know, southern border,
and so now we need to find them.
Whatever the rationale becomes that we need this,
not for you. It's not for Americans.
It'll only be strictly applied to this and
Now let's understand. Palantir right now is using
facial recognition of the entire country to seek
out what they claim they're looking for as
immigrants.
That that's not that's a public reality. There's
only the the only way they can use
that to look is towards looking at everybody.
Been going on for a long time, well,
before that statement.
So the point is that you can recognize
a reality in which this narrative becomes used
because of whatever the current Republican agenda is.
Again, it's just the narrative. The the government
wants it regardless. So you have to realize
that this is happening. What they're building out
will be applied. And, you know, it may
not happen in this exact form. It may
come it come in a different way. But
these my point is there's literature. You can
look at what they've been discussing. From the
US government, from the international field, this is
building out. And the players we're pointing to
that are testing things on Gazans right now
are the ones involved in this,
in part, at least. For smart contracts,
Softbrick can turn off your digital currency beyond
a certain point from your house.
Our
world has been turned into a digital panopticon.
That means you can be monitored,
analyzed,
managed, and monetized.
Right.
And, of course, you can see that last
image he showed. Right?
And I just think it's interesting to think
about, you know, what what that
what it what causes that ability? What allows
that? Right? And the obvious point is, in
one major part, what they've been building out,
not just the satellites, not just Starlink, but
the satellite network, the spy network as they
call it. As, again, the NRO said, you
can't hide.
We now have eyes everywhere, he said in
a meeting. That's the National Reconnaissance Office.
The point was he as he said in
the interview that, hey, Elon Musk is helping
us do this, Elon Musk and SpaceX, but
they're using the AI to make this all
work.
So back to that point, the reality is
icon.
That that has been built around you. You're
already in, essentially, the geofenced
world.
How long until they just start parsing out
the areas?
It's not this is not a conspiracy theory,
guys. It's very real. I just hope people
can recognize that. I hope it doesn't happen
the way that we worry that it will.
Now
some health discussion, I think, is very important.
The initiative put this out, breaking congress moves
to grant vaccine like immunity to pesticide grants,
which is the reality. I looked this up
in the in the actual up appropriations bill,
which you've linked down here. Section four fifty
three would shut down EPA reviews and shield
Monsanto Bayer from 67,000
cancer lawsuits. Like David Ike said, we tired
of winning yet? Maha. Right?
How is this possible? I mean, I don't
even know. I'm tired of even saying that.
Every single day, we see another step in
the wrong direction, and every single day, the
people who wanna ignore it continue to. But
it's it's less every day. And every day,
they stand out like sore thumbs, the people
that are not honest and don't care about
the outcome.
Beef beef initiative you should support. We've discussed,
his work on a and wake up in
the past.
This is interesting.
Somebody this is somebody reached out by oh,
and by the way,
I have I told you guys I have
it turned down because my phone in the
office because I don't want or in the
studio because I don't want it to bother
anything. But I I didn't think I would
get as I apparently, I've got, like, 13
messages that I hadn't realized were there. I
apologize for those that it might have left
messages that I haven't gotten back to. I
plan on doing that as ASAP.
But I just I just caught it while
I was in here, the note blinking, and
I heard somebody, reference this this post. Just
on a side note, though. Sorry if I
can get back to you out there.
Sarepta
shares plunged 40, this is today, as future
of its gene therapy appears at risk.
Just the simple reality of this,
gene therapy, right, this is what we're this
is the gene the the everything. Whether gene
therapy realizes specifically in in the context of
health, if you wanna call it that, but
generally modified foods, organisms in general, it's in
the same sort of wheelhouse. And the point
is this is for, you know, genetically genetic,
gene editing and and things they claim will
be beneficial for you, which except for you
to decide. But that's the mRNA shot as
well. That's what it is despite what their
narratives are. But just in a broader sense,
the gene therapy direction has been what they
it's a major part of where this goes.
So they've reported that three patients have died
related to those gene therapies. You realize gene
therapy that has been allowed not this isn't
an experiment.
This has been allowed. This is a FDA
FDA will request the company voluntarily stop shipments.
Great job, FDA. Sure. Glad you made sure
this wasn't. And this I'm not claiming this
is about RFK or Maha. This I'm I'm
this happened before that if I remember correctly.
The point is that this direction,
the way our government at the way our
FDA and HHS operate, they're not there to
protect you. The fact that this can even
happen and the fact that it's it's it
is the wild west for what they want
to accomplish, in my opinion, at the very
least. And what the person pointed out is
that people are dying to something that they
allowed to go out, in my opinion, because
this is the direction. Just like the mRNA
shots.
I don't know why in the world we're
even allowing this to continue to happen, but
one of the many.
Good thing and good, their stock dropped. We'll
see if they actually care to stop putting
it out. Just like in the past, that
rarely actually happens. Or they'll ban something all
around the world and the US government will
keep selling it to you for fifty years.
Now
the overlapped AI, which is important,
Josh, Josh Walco says OpenAI
says it's supercharging
biodefense research. Weirdly enough, XAI, before it got
updated,
was claiming that XAI had a contract with
Pfizer.
And somebody asked it point blank and said,
well, what about you set up here? And
they go, oops. That was a moment where
we had misinformation. It's like, maybe.
Or maybe that was the truth, and somebody
made you cover it up. I mean, that's
we've already seen that happen. But I you
can decide. I I obviously think there's overlaps
to all of this. I think we've already
proven that whether it's his company or not,
that this AI direction, AI I mean, FDA
even pointed this out, the AI medicine. That's
what they're doing. Rather, AI drugs, mRNA and
the rest, that's what they're doing. It's very
public.
But this
is concerning, whether it's OpenAI, XAI, or anything
else.
Since we've activated our strongest safeguards for ChatGPT
agent, it's the first model we've classified as
highly capable in biology and chemistry.
This is safety research at OpenAI. Here's what
it says on OpenAI's post. We've decided to
treat this launch as highly capable, and that
that's what they were just reading, in the
biological chemical domain as under our preparedness framework,
preparedness,
And activated the associated safeguards. This is a
precautionary approach, and we detail our safeguards in
the system card. Here it is.
Preparedness framework. Look at what it says right
here.
Their framework is OpenAI's approach to tracking and
preparing for frontier capabilities that create new risks
of severe
harm. We currently focus this work on three
areas in frontier capability.
Biological and chemical capabilities that in addition to
unlocking discoveries and cures can also reduce barriers
to creating and using biological chemical weapons.
The idea
that they're even intertwining these ideas, the idea
of an open AI
having any overlap to this is just insane
to me. And as he says, supercharging
biodefense is probably the last thing we want,
anybody in this country actually wants. But nonetheless,
the point is whether it's gene gene therapy,
genetically modified anything, this stuff is sprinting forward
because they don't ask you.
They do their best to convince you that
what they're doing is what we want, and
they point to the group that says that,
but they don't care what we want in
this country. We should be aware of that
by now or anywhere for that matter. Governments
aren't on your side,
but this is where it's going. And Trump
and the rest are all about it.
On top of that, if you want proof
of that, here's Donald Trump sharing on his
own truth social
this post.
Today's announcement will lower drug prices.
That's Albert Bourla. He posted this out July
17. It says today's announcement
from the White House
about Pfizer
will lower drug prices and provide important medicines
directly to Americans. Yay.
I mean, yeah, that's in in a general
sense, the idea is a positive thing for
people that need those things. Hope I hope
you can maybe take a step back and
reflect on whether you need pharmaceuticals, but
I'm a poor law from Pfizer.
Whether you agree with that's worrisome or not,
his base would what did they say before
this? He was supposed to go to jail.
That was what they told that's what the
narrative was. And here he is working hand
in hand with Trump. Thank you, Trump, for
your leadership and delivering on your promises. Well,
isn't that what you're supposed to say? Now
what's funny, by the way, if you search
for this as oh, I like pointing this
out to you guys. It doesn't come up.
Under top, latest, anything. Here's one from 02/2019.
Today's announcement reflects that's not what we're talking
about.
Isn't that weird? Now I'm telling you guys,
that's not some kind of a glitch. That's
just a search engine.
The idea that certain things, like Trump mentioning
how the CIA needs to get involved, still
never pops up when you search for it.
There are certain things, whether algorithmic keywords or
not, that are just not supposed to do
that. At the very least, they diminish their
reach.
I've I've only bet you it happens to
work like ours that you search for our
work and it just doesn't pop up at
the same point, but just recognize that you
search for this as often as you want.
Doesn't pop up. I think that's important.
Oh, by the way, here's Trump introducing the
good the, you know, the great Albert Bourla
and then getting booed by his own people.
So he's very well aware that you don't
like them.
That's weird.
I honestly don't know how anymore how I
I go through this stuff,
like, very slowly,
making sure I don't miss them. And I
still somehow miss these videos every now and
again. Here we go.
And this wasn't that long ago. Right?
I just think it's important. Just like when
he mentions the COVID vaccines and people go
boo,
It just doesn't seem to matter, which I
think is relevant to consider why. Pfizer here,
so I wanna thank him. One of
the great people. The head of Pfizer here,
so I Sorry. It's very low. He just
says the head of Pfizer here, one of
the great people, he says.
Head of Pfizer here, so I wanna thank
him. One of the great great people. One
of the great businessmen.
Thank you, Albert. Wow. Thank you.
And all they do is go, oh, he
did it so he could be booed.
Certainly possible, I guess. But that's what's called
an assumption, a self serving assumption.
And based on the fact that he still
supports the mRNA shots that bar Borla was
a part of, pretty clearly he wasn't just
doing it to get booed. He's a part
of it. But you can lie to yourself
all you want if you wanna ignore it,
but just recognize that he is still a
part of this problem, guys.
Very interesting, I think, that he would put
post this on his own account even though
he knows what you think, even though he
knows you don't want him working with this
group. But, yay, we're working together to lower
vaccine prices because that's what we all want.
Right?
Well,
I think it's important to highlight the fact
that
let me be clear about this.
I think it's a rapidly,
shrinking minority of people that still fall for
the stupidity of thing. This kind of lowest
common denominator,
jingoistic,
like, I mean, idiocracy level propaganda.
But there are people that I think just
eat it up, like a cat turd person,
for example, or Bennie Johnson.
My point though is that I think right
now most people are just tired of this
kind of and it's not about not being
pro America. There's a whole conversation to be
had about what that even means and where
we are in the world, but that's not
what I'm even saying.
There's plenty of people that still very much
support this country who recognize how dumb this
is. So let me play this really quickly.
This is the White House. The White House
account put this out.
I mean, that has to be, like, the
dumb I mean, that is the dumbest thing.
It it's it's just basic it's like it's
like you're dealing with a kindergartner in regard
to what they see you as. Here's a
bunch of American Eagles flying out of the
White House and money everywhere. What does it
even mean?
They just simply said, point of view, you
just stepped in today a 179
in the Trump golden age.
Okay.
Is that even what anybody I mean,
if you could argue that maybe in the
middle or a year into it, two years
in, that maybe he'll get to some point
where you think there's success. His own base
does not think
we're still
pumping out mRNA shots. You're hiding the Epstein
files. You've spent a hell of a lot
more than the last brief. I mean, what
are we talking about? But just, you know,
eagles and money and rah rah rah. We're
I mean, this is how stupid this is.
And I simply said, you are a parody
of yourself.
I mean, guys, this is what it feels
like. The absurdity of the movie that was
supposed to be making I mean, that's where
it every day, it seems we're closer to
idiocracy.
Same point here. And I just see this
in America.
That's what that feels like. It feels like
something you would have seen on that South
Park parody
of, Team America World Police.
Doesn't it? Am I crazy? I I just
don't think most Americans are even falling for
this anymore. And I know plenty of people
disagree with me on that reality.
I have a pretty I have a much
higher opinion of the average person in this
country.
Now, lastly on this point, and then we're
gonna get into
citizenship, which I think is really important for
where this goes, especially with the Israel overlap
that I think is shockingly clear to most
people right now.
I don't know if you saw this clip.
I hadn't seen this before, but I don't
think you need this clip to make it
clear that there was something very bizarre that
went down at Butler. I just had, Brad
Miller in the studio, and he is very
adamant with the fact that he believes this
was a complete hoax. Now
I was clear about this in the beginning,
and I've been clear every time since that
it's obvious that something's going on here. The
inconsistency of the reports, the shooting positions, the
how many people. I mean, even the fact
that the main part of the base and
the the Republican team just dropped this without
any real conclusion. And it's at a time
when half of them were saying Secret Service
were involved, and then he went on to
praise them all and say they're good. I
mean, it just this was something weird.
I I I would I the only reason
I wouldn't say I think it's I don't
it certainly could be a hoax. I mean,
I could even ever deny that, obviously, but
But I don't think you can claim that
as absolute. That was his opinion is what
he he was clear about that.
Is that a likely reality of what we're
seeing going forward? I think it's very much
so worth considering, especially with the idea of
the ear and everything else. But don't take
that as me telling you this is I
don't I don't know that because I'm not
as irresponsible as plenty of the mainstream alternative
media to make a claim that I can't
back up with proof.
Not just evidence, but proof.
But the amount of things around this, even
just, again, the ear point that we just
showed you, you understand that that's bay there's
there's no way around that.
The lie about plastic surgery. I mean, you
could it's the statements he made while he
was there, what the doctors themselves said, the
lies about the amount of blood. I mean,
everything has come together now to show you
that they were making parts of this up.
Now that doesn't mean
that proves it was what we're thinking. That's
the point I always make in the past.
It could very well be that there's some
part of it that was, you know, taken
advantage of, or I I don't know.
Even as I say that, it's like it
just add up when you think it through.
My point, though, is that we don't know
for sure.
But this video adds a whole other element
to this, and I think it's very much
worth your time to consider whether or not
this was genuinely something that was made up,
that went planned and executed. I know it's
difficult for some people to get past that,
but what's interesting is the people that are
right now the most resistant to just simply
considering it is all I'm saying. So I
don't know. I can't prove that. But considering
that are the ones that are usually far
more willing to jump into that whether there's
evidence or not. And I think it's an
interesting mental block.
But this was Sal Diagoras simply said, well,
technically, I think and he just shared it
because it was going around. I don't know.
I I can't verify it necessarily, but, oh,
I did share it. It was a guy
down here that was I'd see. Yeah. Right
here. I'd seen him make the rounds, and
he was based and it does appear he
posted it first. He says,
this account, Brick Suit.
Yeah. It's a pretty big account, actually. And
I think he said,
right here. Yeah. Hey, Sal. How about tagging
him? Because, which I think he did. Someone
covered literally removed his watermark and used it.
I'm just it's so gross the way the
partisan field works today. That's how this goes.
You get the large accounts that just kinda
scrape off other people that don't have this
is a pretty large account itself, but they
just share it and use it for themselves
and get their reach, and it's just gross.
People are disgusting today in in the partisan
field. But the point is the video. And
I simply said that is pretty interesting. I
just wanna make sure we give a credit
to the person who it does appear shared
it first.
So what you're gonna see is an angle
from the stage where you can see right
it's as I'll just read what he wrote,
saying moments after shots were fired, a member
of Trump's team rushes to the side of
the stage to gather photographers.
That and in the flag part, I do
think makes relevant points here.
Has this been shot?
Oh, no.
Either that or they're covering we don't know.
Either that or they're covering him.
We love this.
We love this present group.
We love you.
And there he is. So this guy, right
as it happens,
right here,
you see him run off.
Oh, I skipped it. It's right here. It's
right at the beginning. Has this been shot?
Right there.
It paused. Has this been
shot? Oh, no.
No.
It's right there. So you see that guy
right there right as a star. This guy
walking right here
right as it happens. Now my thought was
clearly that I mean, it's not un impossible
that
petty people like this might have a standing
order that if somebody shoots or even is
shot, they go immediately get the photograph because
that's important. I mean, that that is a
a part of that does make sense. It's
still really hard to believe
that they would be that primed and ready
with that. You know? And, the there's so
many points from the conversation of this. You
can look at our website and check it
out. Why they rushed toward the crowd? Why
the Secret Service violated everything they usually do?
Why there wasn't shots fired first? As they
somehow wanted you to believe that they're not
supposed to fire first, despite the next time
it happened, they fired immediately? Because that is
the way it goes. Even Dan Bongino told
you that. That, yes, they're supposed obviously. As
far as I understand it, they don't even
keep their safety on the Secret Service because
it's about firing instantaneously. The point is it
doesn't line up. Or the fact that the
way he turned his head quite literally proved,
as I could show you a 100 times
over, that from where they shot from, including
even where they claim he was, is impossible
to hit the point of the ear that
they say he did. I mean, it's just
insane. But let me I'll play it all
the way through.
Has this been shot?
Oh, no. Oh, no.
Oh,
no. Either that or they're covering we don't
know. Either that or they're covering him.
We love you, brother Chris. We love you,
brother Chris.
That's weird.
That's weird. That's weird. And then
because the flag is lowered to position.
We love you. And it is.
Whether that's by accident or not or by
I'll show your claim next.
At the peak moment for the opportune shot
as the right after the photographers are brought
up and right after that guy runs back
up there, Peter oh, wait. Let me make
sure that's the right guy.
No. I don't think it is, actually. Either
way
let me see.
No. It's not. But either way, the point
is right after the guy brings him back,
you take the shot and the flag lowers
in a position.
Which is okay. You can be a fan
if you want to. Just recognize that's emotional.
That's not about facts. It's about support. It's
about team sport politics.
He continues to move the photographers in a
position with help from his colleagues. He
does.
And by the way, into position for exactly
the the shot, like, the shot that everyone
used. I mean, it's just it's hard not
to be questioning that. Now just to what
somebody said,
which is worth considering,
the narrative as I I I did look
quickly, and I remember hearing this, I think,
that the they said the flag was moving
down because someone shot the crane's hydraulics and
the fluid spurted out lowering the flag. Now
there is zero evidence to back that up.
I I mean, I I I've looked into
my old reports. I looked at our past
coverage. I asked the AI bots to see
what you know what the point is. The
reality
is that, ultimately,
there's a claim that circulated that that somebody
near it heard one of the cranes you
know, a bullet lick clink around was, I
guess, was the report, And then it lowered.
And so the assumption became that it hit
it, probably hydraulic fluid. I heard that floating
around in the beginning. There's nothing, as far
as I can tell, to prove that. There's
not even evidence to back that up. Other
than the flag lowered, and that's what makes
it make sense.
Possible. Right?
But when you look at everything else that
happened, it becomes near impossible to not think
that there's something off here.
So think about that in a larger context.
Think about what this did for the movement
and where we are and what's happening. If
there were in a position where you needed
some massive tur like, a an, an, upheaval,
a shift in the way we live our
lives so jarring that people wouldn't accept it,
how else do you get things to happen
like that? It's worth considering.
Again,
understand that this is just a consideration point.
Now the evidence though, I would here, let
me make a clear point on this, actually.
I would never state something like this without
evidence that
that strongly suggested
that direction.
That's very important. And I'm theorizing about certain
points is important in this field.
The difference of when I make fun of
her call out people in the mainstream alternative
media is when something happens and it's like
like, okay. With Trump and the Epstein files
where it became, it's most it's probably that
he's blackmailing the the deep state. Okay. Certainly
possible. Right? Is there a data point to
back that up? Is there a shred of
evidence that even indicates that might be happening?
No.
I would've I'm talking about that immediately if
that was the case. So that is my
problem there. Theorizing and considering possibilities,
we all do it. As long as we're
clear and I would argue it's responsible to
do it when you're saying, and here's just
my opinion. The problem in the mainstream field
is they use that and act like just
blindly reaching, you know, as I call it,
assuming into the wind
about what helps their narrative is dishonest. At
the very least, it's self serving and it's
not journalism. So that's the difference there. So
in this point, or rather the point we
just discussed
from the video, it's about the fact that
a thousand data points we went over, hyperbolic,
a lot of them,
very clearly suggest that there's something amiss here,
the ear, the location, the way they responded.
So this just adds one more data point
of evidence
to that suggestion point. So it is worth
considering. And I I hope you guys notice
the difference in that. Now, let's go into
how all of this, by the way, has
led into a lot of different things, including
the one of I mean, if not the
one of the most unconstitutional efforts I've ever
seen in this country in regard well, that
I have personally witnessed and been around to
see in regard to what they're doing with
immigration,
what they're doing with
Americans, what they're doing with Visa holders, green
card holders, or illegal aliens, all of which
have constitutional rights despite the dumb people out
there, or rather I should say, the uneducated
people out there around that topic.
And the reality being that as I mean,
we're gonna get into a little bit. I
actually I don't think. I think I might
have pushed it off. The majority of people
that I could see are people that are
here, no criminal record, and a large portion
of them with who are here legally,
either because they have a Visa or a
green card or in the process of going
through asylum or the process of gaining one
of those two things, all of which are
the legal realities that are supposed to be
what we want from these people. Right?
How else do you gain that? The idea
is you're supposed to try to go, I
want to be a citizen. Right? So you
come and you go through the process. How
else is that supposed to happen?
Especially if you're a refugee and you wanna
go through the right process. Right? But see,
they're taking advantage of those people, claiming they're
all villains while letting all the MS thirteen
leaders
go, while going after people that are not
part of that gang and letting one out
of jail who claims he is. That is
what they're doing on a, you know, a
microcosm of the larger problem.
This is something I wanna reiterate because it
is important.
I just it's amazing to me how clearly
this narrative is evolving.
It's certainly possible with the whole floating the
idea of deporting Americans was a sort of
a head fake because clearly it's taking my
attention. But
it's the idea that it's even on the
table ish it should scare us all. Now
here's what I'm seeing from Jack Posobiec. You
know, psyop jack over here, July 14.
This is clearly not an American, he says.
We need to stop accepting this nonsense.
Okay.
Omar Fata Fatai Fatai
Fatai
announces mayoral run-in
Minneapolis,
pledging to raise the minimum wage, freeze rent,
and Trump proof the city. Oh, okay. Now
we now we get where it's going. Okay.
Is he is he if if this was
a person, he wasn't an American citizen, he
wouldn't be able to run for office. Right?
So I did my basic due diligence, and
not just from Wikipedia. I posted that because
it's just publicly acknowledged.
Turns out he was born in Washington, DC.
And that is the reality. I've I've double
checked this. And, of course, obviously, anything could
be alive. But is there evidence to point
that he thought he was born somewhere else?
Not that I can see. So we have
evidence that says he was born in the
Washington in Washington, DC, and then people out
here just going, he's not an American. That's
the reality of the story.
And I said, you mean aside from being
born in Washington, DC? Who are you working
for, Jack? I mean, think about this. You're
an American citizen born in The United States,
not a naturalized citizen. You're born in The
United States. Washington, DC no less. And because
you have brown skin and family from another
place, this person wants you to believe you're
not American. That is probably the most un
American thing I've ever seen these people say.
But that's the whole point, guys. They're not
actually fighting for what you think they are.
I think they're fighting for Israel, quite frankly,
but that's a whole another thing. I mean,
not really. It's the focus of a lot
of us today. But
this person says these people somebody that follows
him, that supports him,
Jack, says these people may be citizens of
America, but they are not Americans. Ah. So
either Jack already knew he was an American
citizen and still said he's clearly not an
American simply based on his skin color, which
is just disgusting. I mean, that is the
definition of racism. Or the I and or
this person comes right out oh, my point
was either he knows that and he's just
being disgusting, or he doesn't do his due
diligence and pretends he's not an American citizen.
His own follower goes, well, he may be
a citizen, but he's not American.
What are you talking about? I'm willing to
bet you that this guy is on the
mind that he is a naturalized citizen because
that's the thing right now. Well, they're just
because they're US citizens and they moved here
doesn't mean they're real Americans. Yeah. It actually
does. You disgusting person. The reality, though, is
they're trying to make an opening for going
after people that are pro something that they
argue is not America.
You know, like, pro Hamas, pro Palestine, pro
anything. And some of those you may disagree
with. The point is, it's not your opinion.
It's not your decision. It's called free speech.
It's called ideological freedom, and we used to
pretend that's what this country is about. Jack
is showing you that's not what they think.
You're not allowed to think and say what
you want in this country if it goes
against a certain country. That's what he's a
part of.
Now, we talked about this
many times already. Americans speaking out about Israel's
genocide could be next.
In principle, it's no different than that illegal
alien being sent to El Salvador, or the
Visa card holder, or the green card holder.
All of them have constitutional protections.
That's the reality of it. I can go
on over it 50 times over it, is
the case despite people that don't know any
better. The reality is,
in principle, it's no different than you. And
especially since Donald Trump has floated that American
citizens could be next. In fact, here's the
Miami Herald as of July 7 saying the
justice department, driven by Trump policy,
plans to go after naturalized
citizens,
US citizens,
simply because they moved here and became citizens,
which is what we all tell them they're
supposed to do. And if they say something
about Israel, well, we're gonna take that back
even though legally you're not allowed to. Not
like that.
That's the it's the it's no different in
my opinion. Well, the I went over it
in-depth. There are a few openings in regard
to naturalized citizens, and it involves extreme things.
They're they're they're bending these ideas.
The point, though, that I'm making with this,
as Jack Posobiec is pointing to an actual
American citizen born in this country and saying
he's not an American, is that Trump has
already floated many times that US citizens could
be deported and made it clear that he
means ones born in this country.
Just I I just felt like the need
to play this again very quickly. So here
he is saying it. I'll go through only
two examples for technically three. It's been six
times now he's floated this out.
That you're open to deporting,
individuals that aren't foreign aliens but are criminals
to El Salvador. Does that in does that
include potentially US citizens fully naturalized in America?
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happen
to be 90 years old Just in case
you missed it, right there, he said both.
Right? US citizens. And so he doesn't mean
just naturalized.
He means all of them. And both time
and this is Trump has made it repeatedly
clear that even if you're born here, you're
not you're not off the table if he
decides you did something against Israel. That's how
that's what the reading is, but realize that
it doesn't matter what the narrative is.
That's not how that's supposed to go. The
idea that you're that you can take away
a US citizenship or deport somebody based on
ideas is, I mean, fundamentally counter to what
we believe this country is.
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happened
to be 90 years old, and
if,
if they rape
87 year old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn
yeah. Yeah. That includes them. What? Do you
think there's special category of person? No. Just
have rights like everybody, but he doesn't seem
to know that or he doesn't care. They're
as bad as anybody that comes in. We
have bad ones too,
and, I'm all for it.
Because we can
do things with the president
for less money and have great security.
Which, by the way, has clearly fell on
his face, and that's not true. And I
mean, there's now been an exchange between Venezuela
and El Salvador to get people out that
they claim couldn't be removed. I mean, it's
it's they're they're lying to you every single
step of the way. I'm convinced, which we'll
probably talk about on Monday with Bruce and
Jeffrey, about the idea
that there's more going on there, that there
are people in Venezuela. They they exchange with
people from Venezuela. They called them political prisoners.
I think that Bukele needed people from Venezuela
like we've seen, the same people he needed
from The United States because they might testify
that he made a deal with MS thirteen,
that they gave people away to get those
people back, which is why he requested them
from Trump. This has already come out, the
first part of it. Whether he needed that
for that reason is my opinion. But the
bottom line, this person made a deal with
MS thirteen. The evidence has come out. Trump
knew that, and they they literally have let
the leaders of MS thirteen off the hook.
I I see. It's very clear what's going
on. And so the question is,
well, the point is, what he's saying here
is not even the case. Like, we can
build some kind of off nation
deportation dynamic. It just I think it comes
to the point of trying to remove anybody
that they don't like.
And we have a huge prison population. We
have a huge number of prisons, and then
we have the private prisons, and some are
operated well, I guess, and some aren't.
But,
he does a great job with that. We
have others that we're negotiating with too.
But, no, if it's if it's, if it's
a
homegrown criminal,
I have no problem. Now we we're studying
the laws right now. Pam is studying. If
we can do I'll play that clip from
judge Napolitano again. Just somebody who clearly understands
the law and how alarming that statement is.
That either because he doesn't know that, which
is terrifying because it's textbook, it's simple, it's
obvious, or because he's pretending they can maneuver
around it. It's terrifying. That that's good. And
I'm talking about violent people. I'm talking about
really bad Doesn't matter. Can they use the
extreme examples because they want you to go,
oh, a grandma beater. That's okay. No. It
does it's regardless of the crime. The law
is the same.
People. Really bad people. Every bit as bad
as the ones coming in. And I made
the statement when I heard about this
a long time ago now, four years ago.
When I heard that this guy was
having open borders, I said every single
criminal from all over the world is gonna
be dumped into our country. And that's Yeah.
Oh, no. That's not what happened. But
the idea,
it's just it's the as somebody writes in
the chat, the private prison industry, the fact
that we even still have
a for profit private prison industry is the
sign of this country's decline.
Here's the next one.
We use it for
violent criminals, our own violent criminals? I call
them homegrown criminals. Yes. I mean, the home
The homegrowns could be that grew up and
something went wrong and they hit people over
the head with a baseball bat.
We have, and push people into subways
Yeah. That's not rehearsed at all. Right? Just
before the train gets there like you see
happening sometimes.
We are looking into it, and we wanna
do it. I I would love to do
that.
Yeah. Pretty casual. Right?
Okay.
And if we don't have Elon,
they could be up there a long time.
Who else is going to get him?
And I just wanna thank him. He's going
through a lot, what they're doing to him.
And these people are gonna be caught, and
they they're gonna be caught, and they're gonna
be prosecuted. This is around the Tesla thing.
Remember that when they were friends, like, thirty
seconds ago? And he was literally going, buy
Tesla, and and anybody that scratches a Tesla
is gonna be investigated.
And And they use that to talk about
deporting Americans.
And from what they tell me, I see
this just by watching your programs
and reading the news, but from what they
tell me, they could get 20 in jail,
and they'll get it. I'll tell you. There's
gonna be no leniency and there'll be no
pardons. I can tell you that. Right? And
you said this morning twenty years in jail
and then maybe they yeah. You said this
morning twenty years in jail and then maybe
they'll go to one of these prisons in
El Salvador. Do you think with the way
that the judges have been issuing injunctions,
it would be easier or harder to send
these Tesla domestic terrorists to a jail in
El Salvador.
Meaning, American citizens born in this country who
are protesting Tesla. Then these MS 13 or
trendy arrival guys. Well, I view these people
as terrorists just like,
others. These are, when I looked at those,
showrooms burning
and the You mean the one?
As far as I know, the one.
The rest of them were basically scratches and
some some fire bombs, you know, little moth.
They're not it's not they're a big deal.
Right? Somebody pulls a Molotov cocktail in a
car, that's a crime. But the way they
blew this up into somehow terrorists in, you
know, in going after showrooms across the country,
typical government nonsense. This car is not one
or two, like, seven, eight, 10 burning, exploding
all over In the one location. Of the
place.
These are terrorists. You didn't have that on
January 6, I can tell you. You didn't
have anything like that on January 6, which
And so in so in return,
you bombastically cover the other side the same
way. Right? So you're just as bad is
the point that I always make. It's sort
of amazing because on January 6, the the,
You get it. Though he goes on to
do his little thing. The point is about
sending Americans. Oh, wait. Did he say it
already?
Maybe I missed it. Democrats were talking.
Nobody was killed other than a
very beautiful young woman, Ashley.
Ashley Babbitt. I think you said it already.
Nobody was killed.
And you look at what's going on now
with these terrorists. These are terrorists, and that's
an organized event. You know, take a look
at their signs. Take a look. They're all
made by the same sign company. Same old
thing, which is obvious on every it's it
happens every time on all sides. The partisan
sides, all of them are manipulated.
If we can just acknowledge that fact, these
things stop having power.
A nice expensive job. Now these are, the
people that finance it
are, in my opinion, in just as bigger
trouble as the people that are setting the
match and setting the fires.
So we'll see.
It's under very serious investigation by the FBI
and by the justice department. These people are
terrorists.
Okay. Now here is the newest one.
You saw this. We talked about it already.
This was from Al Alligator Alcatraz,
And it was
fifty six zero eight.
This is
recent,
and he makes it very clear.
I mean, you you may morph this into,
you know, your prison system, frankly, which Oh,
funny enough, on the prison point, he's literally
talking about having DeSantis, who I guess, you
know, they hit thirty seconds ago hate each
other. Now they're best friends. You know, this
is funny how it all works. They're all
against you. That he's talking about turning out
that what they're doing with these September into
making that his current prison system. You know,
but, like, you know, building it out in
something
permanent.
But it just it just shows you how
crazy this is getting. I know you always
need, unfortunately.
I'd like to say, you know, a little
controversial, but I couldn't care less.
We have a lot of bad criminals that
came into the,
into the this country, and they came in
stupidly. It was an unforced error. It was
a incompetent president that allowed it to happen.
It was an auto pen maybe that allowed
it to happen, and it did happen. But
we also have a lot of bad people
that have been here for a long time.
People that whack people over the head with
a baseball bat from behind when they're not
looking and kill them. People that Same thing.
Knife you when you're walking down the street.
They're not they're not new to our country.
They're old to our country. Many of them
were born in our There it is.
System where you're gonna keep it for a
long time. You know? It's a Oh, shoot.
Far away from I forgot how long this
video is. I tried to just barely move
back. Sorry about that.
Jails that take years to build and
It's right there, I think. And stupidly, it
was an unforced error. It was a incompetent
president that allowed it to happen. It was
an auto pen maybe that allowed it to
happen, and it did happen. But we also
have a lot of bad people that have
been here for a long time. People that
whack people over the head with a baseball
bat from behind when they're not looking and
kill them. People that,
knife you when you're walking down the street.
They're not they're not new to our country.
They're old to our country. Many of them
were born in our country. I think we
ought to get them the hell out of
here too. You wanna know the truth. So
maybe that'll be the next job that we'll
work on to get
Guys, there's no denying that. He just
literally stated that if you you are born
in this country, so a born US American
citizen,
and you come into crime that he decides
bad enough,
maybe you're the next one to get thrown
into jail in Alcatraz or before or or
rather deported is the real point of what
this is about. That's what they're talking about.
Because the point is, Al, these places are
supposed to be temporary centers before they deport
them. I mean, guys, you just can't hide.
Again, maybe it's all just hype to get
us distracted.
But just the opening the door of this
conversation is going to hurt us.
I I I more than anybody, if you're
a Republican, a conservative, somebody out there who
cares about the call it out. This is
unacceptable.
It's not some secret trick to play for
any chess move against the Democrat. Even if
it is, that's crazy.
You are this is part of the problem,
guys. Now
if you don't believe me, again, here's judge
Napolitano telling you how alarming this is. And
this was when he said it the third
time. It's been six times now. I'm respect.
It's just as bad now, the authoritarianism,
that is coming, Gerald. I am really, really
fearful for the president of The United States
Of America to suggest as he did on
Air Force One on Sunday night,
that American
citizens could be deported
for his press secretary to say, we're looking
into,
a way to see if this is legal.
We don't know if it's legal or not.
A is terrifying.
B, betrays such a profound ignorance of first
principles to which he is sworn. He is
sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution
and to enforce,
federal law. You mentioned that you're open to
deporting,
individuals that aren't foreign aliens but are criminals
to El Salvador. Does that in does that
include potentially US citizens fully naturalized in Ukraine?
If they're criminals and if they hit people
with baseball bats over their head that happened
if
rape
seven year old.
And what? Do you think there's special category
of person? They're as bad as anybody that
comes in. We have bad ones too. Profoundly
un American, utterly unconstitutional,
and I am sorry to say
is coming.
It's a chilling warning from somebody who knows
what he's talking about. I I don't understand
how people who, you know, people judge DePaulitano
is a popular per you know, entity on
the Republican side.
And for someone to be that you know,
he it's clear what he says is happening.
I just find it either the fact, like
I keep talking about, that the majority has
long since believed in the narrative and we're
just being shown a false the the the
fake no. They're looking at the shadows in
the cave, right, in regard to the partisan
game. That's certainly possible, but or it's just
only now beginning to break down. I I
I hope it's the former. I hope the
people are have long been around it, and
it was just hard to see through the
controlled structures.
But here is a new report from the
the New Republic. MAGA Republican says he doesn't
care if ICE detained US citizens. This is
July 16.
It says, congressman, this is the congressman
where was it?
I just had it highlighted. Where was that?
Right here. Troy Nells.
Alright. It says on Capitol Hill,
representative Ralph Nohman,
tech Texas representative Troy Nills, and Alabama senator
Tommy Tuberville
brushed off reports that American citizens are being
targeted by ICE in overzealous raids. They are.
I mean, there's been three examples of American
citizens that have been this close to being
sent overseas.
But it says, congressman,
do you care if US citizens accidentally
get detained in ice raids? Just detained is
all they're talking about.
It says, no. I'm not concerned about that.
I'm concerned about law and order in America.
Now he goes on to make the case
that it's all it's, you know, it's not
on accidents are gonna happen.
Yeah. If you allow
no process, if you allow them to mask
themselves and have no accountability and not identify
themselves and not have a warrant, then, yeah,
that's surely gonna happen. That is not the
same thing. What they're trying to do is
create this lawless dynamic. They can do whatever
they want and just claim to just tough
it out. We're doing the right thing.
Not what's happening.
In fact, because what they're actually doing is
not even going after the criminals,
if you understand the reality.
Now the American Immigration Council put this out
on July 1. Senate approves
unprecedented spending for mass deportation, ignoring what's broken
in our immigration system. This is the funding
for ICE in the appropriations bill
that gives it more get I think it's
40 something billion dollars. It's more than most
countries' militaries.
If you don't see what that shows you
by now, I mean, there you don't need
anything else to understand what that shows you
if you know the history of this country.
What do you think that's gonna do? What
do you think will happen with that funding
and money? It will become exactly what we
worry about. It'll become the enforcement arm in
this country. Under a guise of immigration, it
becomes a national police force all the time.
How long have we how long has someone
like Jones warned about that? Funny how they're
not calling it out now.
Here,
CBNASS news, Trump's big beautiful bill gives ICE
unprecedented funds to ramp up mass deportation campaign.
So let's talk about that bill.
Thomas Massie, foreign aid in the DOD appropriations
bill. This is from today. He says $300,000,000
for Syria and Iraq Military. You know, so
Israel.
Right? The Iraq military, you could argue there's
a deviation there. That's a
right now, even, it's kind of complicated. You
know, PMU, the Iraq government, The US. I
mean, I I Israel is president in Iraq
too, by the way. We showed you that
a long time ago. The US government was
giving them its US passports to operate through
Iraq. That was a major story that barely
got picked up by the mainstream. The point
though is $300,000,000
for Syria. What happened to stopping the wars?
What happened to not continuing the funding? Oh,
yeah. We just don't care about that anymore.
$300,000,000
for Al Qaeda in Israel and and Israel
and Syria. A $118,000,000
for overseas disasters?
What does that mean? I thought that was
the what was I thought we were done
with that. Guess
not. $515,000,000
for AIDS in Africa. Wait. What? I thought
that was no I thought that was Democrats
and woke stuff.
Stop lying to yourselves out there. The obvious
reality of the two party illusion is staring
you in the face. $500,000,000
for Israel on top of everything else. On
top of 3,800,000,000.0 a year, they already get
on top of what Trump already gave them.
$350,000,000
for Kuwait.
Okay.
$1,270,000,000
in foreign security?
You You know, what's that? Think of it.
What if everything they told you was true,
that money would be aimed inward.
Because it's about empire guys. It's about empire,
not about Liberty. It's about empire. Dollars 500,000,000,000
for Taiwan For
I guarantee that's gonna cause strife with
China. It's it's the idea of this game
is it's deliberately
creating these situations.
$267,000,000
to reimburse countries.
He says this isn't America first. I voted
against it because it won't make America great
again. It will bankrupt us.
Seems like somebody sure wants that. Seems like
something is driving this country into collapse.
Plenty of people voted against it. Now it
says and I'll I'll go into Marjorie Taylor
Greene next.
Toll grand grand total,
3,000,000,000,881
or three bureau 3,881,976,004
billion dollars. This is almost half of the
amount of the recessions
recessions
sent overseas
in one bill that was supposed to be
for our military.
I just it's obvious
that you're being lied to, and I mean
by everybody other than a few people that
called us out.
But on that note, remember what we always
talk about.
Here's Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And Mel framed this as Marjorie Taylor Greene
showed more courage yesterday afternoon than any member
of congress has in a very long time.
I don't agree with that. I feel like
people like Massey have been doing much more.
But either way, I'll just read this first.
Oh, wait. Did I lose that? Oh, there
it is.
This is really important. I've made this point
many times. But as this is happening with
whether media or politicians,
I doubt the intention here as she's really
calling this out, and I support everything she's
saying in this. But I doubt the intention.
Just, you know, I'm not saying I know
for sure. But I said, but as I'm
always saying, support the sentiment regardless. Not the
person, not the or the party, the sentiment,
and, of course, continue to question them
regardless.
But if they're calling this out,
raise it up.
Show the opportunists out there
that the truth benefits them more than the
lies.
Now this gets the point is if you
were thinking through, this is obvious.
That doesn't mean then the next time you
blindly support them, the next thing I say,
no. You question that too. You question everything.
I know it's hard to wrap your mind
around.
Continue to question each one. And if they
come out and say something that's true, even
if you know they're just doing it to
get you to support them, still go, that's
correct.
But I don't trust them. I think they're
liars, but that's a great that's a that's
the right sentiment, and I hope they're honest
about it. That is what we had to
do because you're gonna get new people, politicians,
media, who start to
recognize that they will gain more by simply
showing you the truth, which kind of inadvertently
creates an honest system. People that care because
they benefit from the truth. We, as people,
can create that scenario.
There will always be people trying to manipulate
you for a 10 if we are questioning
everything and we do our best to raise
up the truth, and we could be wrong
about that too. The point is as a
collective, as a whole, as a majority,
the majority of the time,
we can change this.
Listen to what she said here because I
think this is important and I think this
is an example of that. Now my point
is the reason I say I don't trust
the intention because of what she's already said,
because of previous actions, because of things that
she's done around just since being in office
around the partisan game.
But
it's not outside their own possibility that someone
like her could go in for the wrong
reasons and decide to change.
Same with Jones, anybody else. I hope for
that in every circumstance, and so should you.
But question it.
Bomb the Catholic church in
Gaza, and that entire population
is being wiped out as they continue their
aggressive war in Gaza. My amendment would strike
500,000,000
in funding for nuclear armed Israel's missile defense
system. The US already provides Israel with 3,800,000,000.0
annually in foreign aid. 3,800,000,000.0,
that's a lot of money.
Additionally,
the April 2024 secondurity supplemental
included 8,700,000,000.0
for Israel.
Even though Israel, nuclear armed Israel, has universal
health care for their citizens
and subsidized college
for their citizens.
They're able to provide that. However, here in
America, we're $37,000,000,000,000
in debt.
My amendment will ensure
an America first department of defense, and that
is exactly
what we need and we haven't had for
a very long time.
Wow.
I'm happy to see that. I mean, my
god, guys. That that I mean,
that is a that is a truth bomb
on top of truth bomb for people. I
mean, everyone in the room knows that, in
my opinion, other than I mean, I shouldn't
say it like that. There's plenty that I
do think are snowed,
but a large portion of them are well
aware of what's actually happening.
She's just made it very clear. I mean,
how do we I mean, this is my
point, you know, for the long term. Look
at what they're look at how how this
country has been subsidizing. I mean, you're paying
for what Israel's doing, including the genocide, and
they're benefiting themselves off of that while taking
advantage of this country in every possible way.
I'm glad people are calling this out.
Very important to see.
Now here is another perspective.
Here's Randy Fine
protecting 600,000
Americans who live in Israel
and supporting the r and d that will
enable the Golden Dome
is as an America first as it gets.
And I was proud to oppose
this America
last amendment.
So regardless of his narrative, which is flimsy
at best, he's literally telling you that you're
it's America last
to stop
to make sure the funding goes to America
first. Literally, that's the case. America would get
that funding first, and he wants you to
believe that's America last. That America first would
be funding Israel.
I just it's
this is a a person, in my opinion,
who's acting for the interest of something other
than this country. And on top of that,
the 600,000
Americans he's referring to are people that live
in Israel, who live in most cases, I
mean, entirely, if you understand the situation, on
stolen land,
and many of which are just people that
are born in Israel who also have US
citizenship, which still makes them an American citizen,
guys. That's the fact. But which clearly will
publicly state, even in this country, like, people
like Brian Masto, a part of the IDF,
that they will act in Israel's interest largely
over The US. That is undeniable. It's not
about Jewish people other than the overlap of
Zionism and Jewish people. It's about the political
control of this country.
Here's what Randy Fine had to say about
what Marjorie Taylor Greene was just talking about.
It's an opposition to this America last amendment
and reject the premise of the arguments that
are being made. There are 600,000
Americans who live in Israel,
and one rocket has been fired against every
23 of them. 26,000
rockets since October 7. 43 Americans killed on
October 7, 12 taken hostage. But more importantly,
the research that this fund is the premise
behind the Golden Dome.
When we support research and development for the
Iron Dome, we are creating the capability for
The United States to defend itself as well.
And I have news.
We have a nuclear weapon too. That doesn't
get you off the hook with those who
are out to get you. When we pass
this when we oppose this amendment, when we
vote it down, we are not only standing
with Israel, we are standing with the best
interests of The United States.
Do you believe that?
I'll let it play through.
I'd like to stop it usually, but this
is what'll happen if I have to play
it through. I have to go back into
it. Anyway, just let's listen to this again.
Arguments that are being made. There are 600,000
Americans
who live in Israel,
and one rocket has been fired against every
23 of them. Important to think about. That
means every rocket that lands in a field
that has no that hurts nobody. Every rocket
that Israel pretends was fired regardless of the
evidence.
These are real things, guys. And some of
them have hit in in regard in in
Israel. But if you're talking about Gaza, very,
very, very, very, very few of them.
So the reality of what he's doing is
trying to make just a simple use of
the rocket, which don't don't forget, we've already
proven the reality of how
Israel and the and the operations and the
I the Masa. I mean, even aspects of
people that they have inside of Gaza are
a part of these manipulations in some cases.
Robert and I have talked about this. That's
no way to say that they don't have
rockets until they're not firing. They are. It's
clear.
They're at war, and they're committing genocide against
them, so it's not hard to wrap your
mind around. But if you look at the
other side of the conversation,
how many people have actually been killed by
these rockets in Israel? How many people in
reverse have been killed in Gaza?
You wanna do the math on what they've
done? They've dropped more bombs on Gaza than
than many wars in the past combined.
And yet, he wants you to think this
is what matters. And, also, the point that
it's coming to, how about the 600 Americans
that were killed
and are no. I mean, that as far
as I could tell, don't exist anymore that
were in Gaza before this started.
NPR wrote about it. There are 600 Americans
that live in Gaza that are trapped. There
was even an American that was born in
The United States that was speaking up going,
I'm trapped in Gaza. Nobody seemed to care.
Definitely not ready. Fine. A guy who Trump
continues to openly support.
26,000
rockets since October 7. 43 Americans killed on
October 7, 12 taken hostage. But more importantly,
the research.
IDF members, by the way, that matters. That
this fund is the premise
behind the Golden Dome. Yeah. Which is a
complete manipulation. It is a money laundering operation
like I've ever seen. We've talked about this
before and how often it simply doesn't work
at all because it's not really I don't
think about that. That's my opinion. I think
we're being played. I think it's about money
laundering. I think it's about a lot of
other things, experimentation. The idea that we're gonna
build this around this country is, as people
have already pointed out based on their framing
it, impossible.
The idea of the amount of money, the
amount it it to me, this is another
manipulation about dumping money out of this country.
But you can decide for yourself. When we
support research and development for the Iron Dome,
we are creating the capability for The United
States to defend itself as well. Oh, okay.
So as long as we dump billions and
billions and billions into a hand into a
government that's allowing pedophiles to prosper and a
government that's allowed on committing genocide to multiple
countries, and they just continue to build out
what oh, really? I mean, the idea that
we give them that money every year is
building up our defenses, I would love to
see you prove that. I would love to
see the outcome.
Show us, Randy Fine. What have we gained
from the relationship with Israel since its inception?
Love to hear it. Well, and I have
news.
We have a nuclear weapon too. That doesn't
get you off the hook.
We? Think about The United States? Maybe not.
I mean, that's a weird thing to say.
What does that even mean?
Anyway, the point here clearly, guys, is this
is about him trying to push back against
what is obviously for this country first, and
he doesn't like it because it puts Israel
second.
I think that's transparent.
Randy Fine, who gets a lot of money
from APAC.
Almost half a million dollars.
Now, of course, Elon Levy comes out, you
know, the guy that was fired as for
being a bad propagandist.
America stands with Israel. The bid to slash
$500,000,000
from military assistance to Israel, which would have
sabotaged American national American national security was crushed.
Look at this. 04/2022
to six.
422
voted to keep this funding for Israel.
Despite what was said,
you need to realize what that shows you.
These people are putting you last, left and
right, and put Israel first. And the idea
that he just literally said that not funding
Israel will put American national security,
will sabotage
national security. How often isn't it weird how
how often these statements feel like threats?
Now
Saudi Agra has put this this image out.
For the first time ever,
The US has spent over $1,000,000,000,000
in a year on war, and it's only
July. Now it's a little bit I think
it's being misunderstood.
The point is that the bill,
which I think is just the stated numbers,
like 896
bill
trillion. The point is it is or rather
billion. The point is
with everything all said and done, the estimates
are looking at like 1,100,000,000,000.0.
The point, though, is that's not spent in
this moment. It's about the year. So this
point, though, is it still correct that it's
we're holding in July, and that's already the
case. So we're I guarantee we're gonna spend
more on top of the bill. But, again,
it doesn't mean that it's being spent in
that one moment. It's planned throughout the year.
The point, though, is there's gonna be more
wars, more funding, more weapons to Ukraine, which
is also still happening. So that is insane.
On top of that,
the world
military
spending hit 2,700,000,000,000.0
in 2024,
the entire world.
And we're talking about a trillion dollars for
warfare
in this year.
It's just insane what's happening right now. World
statistics,
the 15 highest military budgets in 2025.
The United States, that it's 895
they're claiming. And it does it's as I've
how how many times have I said this?
That's when they claim if you look at
the real picture, the things they pretend aren't
military, but they are, it's well over a
trillion. I've said that for a long time.
895,000,000,000
on the surface. Or, you know, what they
claim. China, what they claim, at second, is
266,000,000,000.
Do you not realize how insane that is?
Do you not realize how a ton of
that just gets handed to Israel? This is
an estimate, way more than just the 500,000,000,
guys.
Just look at the look at the list
and recognize that I don't see Iran on
that list, not even the top 15.
Or Israel for that matter because it's subsidized
by The United States. The point, though, is
that the second closest is $266,000,000,000.
The United States, 895,000,000,000.
You're being played.
And in general, this is from Google. It
says, yes. The AI has spent over $1,000,000,000,000
so far in the fiscal year 2025.
I was just kinda searching around. This is
just about the idea of just spending in
general. The idea that while we're told we
were gonna spend less than ever, like Elon
and Trump sold you on, while we were
sold on the idea that we're gonna cut
costs and reduce the government, what have we
got? Bigger government,
bigger technocracy, bigger AI, and more spending than
ever. That's what we told you would happen,
not just T Lab or independent meeting, anybody
with a brain, anybody who's watched, anyone who's
a student of the US government
of, you know, a student of government who's
watching what they do. Now new assessment, just
to add this on the end of this
point, find that America's strikes destroyed only one
of three Iranian nuclear sites. But they were
obliterated, and he shouted you down for saying
otherwise because it's about narrative control.
You're being lied to every single day by
left and right. If you start to understand
the bigger picture, maybe we can change it.
Now let's talk about Gaza. Do you know
this ongoing genocide in your face that is
just getting worse every day because people like
Trump and Biden are too meek to do
anything about it or too controlled.
As Saudi Agris points out, this is what
an ethnic cleansing looks like. Now, again, if
you haven't seen these pictures, guys, this is
very important to understand.
What Gaza was right before this, and even
then understand despite the narrative, this is still
a a society, despite there being good and
bad places within it, that is all generally
suppressed and is inside an open air prison.
They are surrounded by guns. I mean, we
know this based on the way that October
7 started. Right? They're surrounded. They're inside of
a controlled, barbed wired, fenced area. And even
when they go in the water, they can
get shot at. And inside of that, there
are people that are struggling in ways you
can't even understand before October 7.
But there were even groups inside of this
that collaborated with Israel, that got benefits because
of it. So this game they play where
they show you nice areas and go, oh,
look at the lot. The reality is it's
been undeniably obvious to the world for a
very long time. It's just become a focal
point for conversation because of October 7. Now
that's what it looks like.
Look at you get the tower. I mean,
look look at that.
That is what it looks like to wipe
a society off the map. Not because one
of those buildings had a tunnel, but because
they destroyed all of Palestine. That's what this
really was
and still continues to be. Same thing.
If you just look at that,
I believe that's Rafa. I think it's one
of these places where it's just they, you
know, the the idea of sending everyone there
to be safe and then do that.
In twenty years, he says, everyone will say
they were always against this as they always
do,
but we know who's out there who is
currently supporting it.
Harat says new satellite data shows devastating scale
greater than estimated.
It's crazy. And he says 89%
of buildings in Rafa,
you know, the safe place, 84% of buildings
in Northern Gaza have been destroyed.
When The US nuked Hiroshima, it destroyed 67%
of buildings and 40%
in Nagasaki.
Just make sure you think about this for
a second. When The United States sent a
nuclear bomb
over Hiroshima, you know, after the Japanese had
already begun to retreat, which is easily proven
today because they just wanted to see what
happened, I guess, or scare Russia. I don't
know.
It destroyed 67%
of buildings.
A nuclear weapon.
Israel has destroyed 89%
of buildings just in Rafa
and 84% of buildings in Northern Gaza as
a whole.
It takes a special a special kind of
stupid to not acknowledge what this is or
just disgusting, dishonest,
genocidal.
This just made me laugh out loud, I
have to say. Orson Ostrovsky, the fake international
human rights lawyer says and we just simply
post what Anthony Blinken said.
I mean, this is spectacularly
stupid.
Anthony Blinken was caught probably five times in
a row
going, Hamas just has to sign the deal,
and it'll all be over. And then and
then they do, and Israel goes, never mind.
And then he goes, Hamas broke the deal.
I mean, it was embarrassing.
I mean, it was exactly like that, but
sometimes in the same day.
And so my point is, Blinken is well
aware that
every single time, and even beyond him, we've
seen this, where they go the big one
with Trump, where they were on phase two
was supposed to start, and all of the
hostages would be released. All of them.
What did they do? Israel broke it down
and started bombing and blamed them. And then
went on to say, we we want the
hostages back, even though that's what they would
have gotten if all they had to do
was continue the phase. That's the reality. So
my point is they know that the thing
holding up the the the release of hostages
is Israel.
Here's what he just said.
I wish that those this is blinking. I
wish that those who understandably have been moved
and motivated by everything that's happened since October
7, he's not talking about the genocide, mind
you, if they'd spent just maybe 10% of
their time calling on Hamas,
demanding Hamas put down its arms because that
would have stopped the genocide. Right? Because they
what have they been saying? That once we
get the hostage back, everything's over? No. They
said Hamas has to be destroyed. So if
they put their weapons down, that would have
been an immediate genocide for the rest of
the area. They've made that clear. But he
goes, give up the hostages.
Stop what it's doing. Maybe if the world
had done that, we'd be in a different
place.
So his lie is to claim that had
we just had give up the hostages. You
mean, like, they kept offering to do? Put
your arms down like they kept offering to
do.
It's just sad how clear this is. But
it's the important thing to take away is
that people like Blinken, people what is that?
Murray sitting next to him? People like Trump
and Biden and the US government.
They know what they're doing. They know they're
lying to you, and they are simply just
propelling the narrative even though you know they're
lying, even though they know you know they're
lying.
What does that show you? I don't need
to map it out. They're working for somebody
else,
or they're blackmailed, or they're controlled. I mean,
it's just shockingly clear that they're even when
you know that you're still pushing it through.
Here
is an example of the supremacy
that is guiding some of the Zionism that's
spreading across the the world like a plague
right now.
And this is important to understand. This this
woman has been what is it named? Danielle
Weiss, I believe. She is she I think
that's what it is. She's the leader of
this this illegal settler movement and has been,
like, rabidly open about it for a very
long time, even calling on Trump and Biden
to you know, the and they are they
have plans to create new settlements in Lebanon,
which they're already starting to try to do.
The same thing in Syria, the same thing
in Gaza. They're open about it. Meanwhile, our
own government lies or Pierce will even shout
it down even though he'll listen to her
tell you right now.
Here's Pierce Morgan again, giving her time to
talk about it and not really pushing back
on the extreme nature of what she's saying.
Zachary Foster says, ever wonder how the Nazis
convinced themselves genocide was the solution?
Just watch this interview with a living Nazi,
and it will all make sense.
About the fact that over 20,000
Palestinian children have now been killed since October
7 in Gaza. It's a lot more than
that.
I think that the Palestinians,
as you said you see? I said Palestinians.
The Gazans and all Arabs are She wants
to be praised for simply using the right
term.
Should stop
attacking Seventh in Gaza.
I think that the Palestinians,
as you said you see? I said Palestinians.
The Gazans and all Arabs around
should stop
attacking
Israel. Well, I just asked you how you
thought about 20,000 children being killed by the
IDF.
So how do you feel about that? Think
that that
I think that the parents should be
very careful
before they teach the, the children
to hate Jews and to kill Jews. So
the Okay.
So
you're okay killing children if you believe they've
been taught bad things.
That's a monster sitting right there. A monster.
You realize she didn't even make that she
made that undeniably clear. I mean, look, even
if she's wrong, by the way, and which
is at least in many, many, many cases,
I'm sure there's some example of what you
say. The point is to argue, to assume
that everyone out there, every child has been
taught to kill Jews, which is not even
what Palestinians think. It's insane how how wrong
this is, how wrong headed all of this
is. But that even if that was the
truth, that you're simply going that that's okay,
that we should just kill the children because
they taught them bad things,
this is supremacy. This is, like, the worst
of the worst. This is the same thing.
Like, imagine the same logic in reverse. If
anyone's, well, you're or applied to anyone else.
They're currently ethnically cleansing in Syria. The logic
applies there. These people are disgusting. But my
question I won't be my question. So I'm
sorry sorry sorry to be persistent, but my
question That was your question. My question was
how do you feel answer. My question was
how do you
How do you personally feel
about over 20,000
Palestinian children
now being killed since October 7 in Gaza?
How do you feel about that? I
I think
that Arabs,
Gazans, or Jordanians,
or Syrians, whoever,
should be very, very careful
with the way they educate the children.
All of them. Every Arab, everyone in the
world. Thank you, Laura Loomer.
That's where it comes from.
Not her in particular, but this ideology.
And, again, that because they teach them things,
it's okay to kill them is what that
just meant twice in a row. Wasn't my
question. That wasn't my question. Of them where
many of them Can you answer my question?
That was my answer? You don't care. You
you have no thoughts about these children at
all. You choose
you
choose your questions,
and I
answer them Of course. The way I believe
is right. But just to be clear, you
have nothing to say about 20,000
children being killed.
Nothing at all. I have a lot I
have a lot to say about
everything that happened as a result of the
massacre
of the seventh of October. You care about
Israeli children who died. Citizens.
Do I. But I'm able to care about
both sides of children who've died. Why don't
you care seemingly
about the Palestinian children who've died? Why can't
you express any sympathy
or sorrow
or empathy
with the children who've died in Gaza? Are
you able to do that?
I I warn all Arabs from all sides,
from all borders. Warn them.
Stop
educating
children Right. To hate
Jews. Or this is what will happen.
That's what she's doing.
And I and again, you must understand by
now with the amount of evidence that's been
laid out for people that care about this
to understand that this is not the this
is not even the leading sentiment to Palestinians
anywhere in the world despite the propaganda.
Clear. I've now offered you three Stop. Three
times. I made myself very clear. Oh, you
made yourself very clear. You asked me five
times. I'm gonna give you one last You're
my you're asking me to give you okay.
I'm gonna give you one last chance
to offer some empathy
or sympathy
or sorrow
about the deaths of 20,000
children
in Gaza. Are you capable of doing that?
I can tell you that had you cared,
and I don't believe you that that you
care a tiny bit
about one killed person
if you do not use
the means that you have
as a media person
to stop
educating
Okay. Children I gave you four chances.
Alright.
Okay. You gave me seven. You gave me
seven. You know what? You could give a
damn, could you? You couldn't give a damn.
Blame more than me. You don't care, and
all you want is all the Palestinians gone.
You can barely even bring yourself to say
their name. All you want is to take
over the West Bank and Gaza. You don't
care how many die in the process. You
want them all gone.
You don't care, do you? That's the bottom
line.
As you said, the audience will judge. Yeah.
They will.
Wow.
Now you know my thoughts about Piers Morgan.
But just like we talked about earlier, I'm
I mean, I'm showing it for a reason.
That's my point. Raise it up. It's it
has an impact. He's asking it. He he's
I mean, he appears to care about that.
But
I I just don't understand how someone like
this can just suddenly see it even after
I mean, six months into the genocide, he
was still defending what they're doing. You know,
it's it's opportunism.
I know it in my gut, but it's
my opinion.
Either way, it still doesn't change the fact
this is exactly the point I'm making.
Piers Morgan has clearly recognized that he gains
more from being honest about this than he
does about towing the Israeli line despite the
fact that I guarantee you he gets torn
apart, he gets attacked, he probably gets threatening
information because he's taking these lines. Unless there's
some kind of a, you know, internal, what's
the term for it, like, counterintelligence dynamic happening
here. Always question everything. Consider the facts or
rather all the evidence and make sure facts
guide your decision. The point
is this is obvious.
These pea and the fact that even Piers
Morgan is pointing to this person and, like,
giving her the rope to hang herself with.
Just you're you are clearly a terribly disgusting
person who does not have any empathy for
anybody who you've just othered.
I mean, that that again, I'll read exactly
what Zachary Foster said. Ever wonder how the
Nazis convinced themselves genocide was the solution?
Now I don't mean like the I what
I would argue his point means is not
the the leadership, not the not the government
that doesn't care. That is obviously, you know,
historically don't doing things like this, but the
people who adopted these ideas.
Watch this interview with a living Nazi, and
it will all make sense.
Here is another video that's coming out of
another person who was freed from Israeli detention
centers.
Freed Palestinian prisoner, who's a journalist, by the
way. Sam Alsai
describes how he was raped by Israeli soldiers
with objects as a welcome to the Israeli
Israel's notorious
Megiddo Prison.
Different than said Tiananmen and the other prisons
where people have been raped and they've all
proudly
discussed. Or that on their media channels, they
debate why it should happen.
I mean, you understand that people will go,
that's not true. He's making it up. Okay.
Possibly.
But are we debating that this is happening?
Because they've publicly
debated whether it should continue
on Israeli mainstream media.
It's, again, it's a it's a, like, a
failing effort right now to try to bury
all this because it's not going away.
Now I'll just include this again because we're
talking about what they're doing.
Make sure you didn't miss this story.
Major story from the Israeli mainstream media that
few will hear. The title was survivors testify.
Israeli politicians participated in sadistic sexual
sexual rituals involving minors. It was in the
mid it was in front of their the
Knesset, their congress,
and members of the of the Knesset
stood up and called it a watershed moment.
Many people filed through and testified about doctors
and and politicians and people with the highest
level of Israeli society who took part in
what they called sadistic sexual rituals that included
minors. There were children and women that were
at the time when it happened who said
they were passed around by people in power.
Story sounds familiar when you look back to
see what was happening in this group, the
Epstein conversation. Right? Dennis Hassard, the things they
use to control this government. This is what
we're talking about, guys. There is something dark
that's coming out, and there's a reason that
Trump and the rest are trying to avoid
what's going on with the Epstein files. That's
what I think.
Now the last segment that I think is
really important to all this oh, I'm sorry.
Wait. One more thing about Gaza, and then
we're gonna talk about Syria to wrap up
today.
But the starvation
is is its own
horrifying element of what's going on in Gaza.
And just bombing people to death, the genocide
is is just sadistically horror. This
is so far beyond just committing genocide. This
is, again, sadistic.
It's wanting these people to suffer before you
kill them. That's what we're talking about. Forensic
architecture.
The more the mounting starvation in Gaza is
a direct result of Israel's dismantling of the
UN model
of a distribution and its replacement with the
lethal GHF system. See, they claimed UN was
Hamas and it was which I don't think
anybody even believed. It was just a flimsy
air air narrative that didn't really line up
with any facts. The point
is that that model,
regardless of how clearly the UN has its
own problems, was in fact getting aid to
these people. They removed that model and have
now turned it into what they call the
squid games, hunger games dynamic, where they're just
executing people who try to get food.
Israel is deliberately
undermining systems of aid distribution by the UN
and other international agencies, restricting the flow of
aid, permitting looting in military zones, and attacking
distribution centers just as civilians have been killed
at the supposedly called, you know, the Gaza
Humanitarian Foundation, which is just funded by Mossad
as Max Blumenthal broke down,
they've been killed at these rationing stations. Those
waiting along aid truck routes are also being
targeted as by the Israeli media, making every
route deadly. See, you don't see we see
them getting executed at the stations.
What we don't see is the people that
are walking there, getting picked off as they
walk there that don't get make the news.
Here's an example of that. The I just
I wanted you to see this because this
is every day, 50 times a day. The
evidence is all over the Internet. Here's another
example of the of the Israeli military hanging
back
and just firing into
what you're seeing here. The area that are
right over where they're firing is where all
the people are standing, waiting for food. This
is what Israel is doing every day. Sitting
there in the
sitting there
in the spring of coffee, rain in the
building fire on people waiting for food.
Happened all day.
I don't mean to literalize the nonsense.
They laugh about it. You know, like that
video we showed you before where they got
they a sniper kills a child on the
fence and they all cheer and go, you
got the video.
It is sadistic what's happening. They want these
people to suffer.
So that's what they're highlighting here, That they're
shooting them as they go, as they stand
there, as they leave.
Here
is an article that Caitlin Johnstone shared.
Unprecedented
malnutrition surges in Gaza.
What you'll find is that someone who we
referenced quite a bit, Nick Maynard,
professor, doctor,
had a disgusting
a a a mish an admission of what's
going on that I didn't know before.
Now the article is quoting Nick Maynard, who
I'll play for you first what he what
I've showed you before, who's been there for
a long time. He's yeah. I think he's
come and gone, but the point is that
he is operating to help people as a
doctor
from outside of Gaza.
And as everyone in this thread
I just I actually just embedded that these
first four. But this long thread of doctors,
every single one of them will tell you
exactly the same thing. Some of them breaking
down crying, trying not to describe to you
as they watch children shot in the head,
as they watch IDF execute doctors in front
of them.
That's how actually obvious this is, and this
is exactly why Twitter puts a warning and
suppresses the content. Despite that, it still gets
lots of reach. That's where we really are.
That's all of TLAP for you right there.
That's a microcosm. But here's what Nick Maynard
said before this.
And this guys, it's just it this was,
I think, in the first so many months.
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure of the hospital has
been destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were a 107
patients sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last forty eight hours there.
Bodies have been discovered
in the last twelve to twenty four hours
with who have been handcuffed with their arms
behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor? By the
Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7.
Over 450
health care workers have been killed. Friends of
mine that I have worked with over the
years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I I can bear witness from
this from my time at Alexa Hospital and
from talking to people that there's been direct
targeting of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not, and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral
damage. This is specifically targeted, you're saying, medical
professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital? Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never
witnessed any Hamas militants in the hospitals they
have worked in.
Right. That's one of an endless stream of
doctors telling you exactly what they're seeing, and
yet we're still lied to by the clearly
Zionist controlled governments of the world.
By the way, this was just something I
just was searching real quickly to see if
there's anything popping up.
This
Zionist propagandist,
six days ago, Israel agreed to a cutter
back ceasefire.
Hamas rejected it. They there should it just
never stops. Hamas is solely to blame for
this war continuing.
Why is nobody talking about this because the
New York Post just blindly repeated what Israel
said?
It's it's insane. We just talked about this.
The reality of what happened this is the
the article he's pointing to is from July
12. He's just trying to jam this in
the conversation today. The reality is it's the
same conversation every single time. There is an
ongoing discussion, and there's very clear basic things
that have been set from the very beginning
that there and the the the Hamas has
been released of all hostages.
An end of hostilities. It's basically all they're
calling for. The reality is Israel knows that
and just continues to pretend like there like,
there's some discussion. And in this last case,
what happened was Israel and The United States
agreed on what they were gonna say. Then
they thrown it out in the world and
said, we have an agreement. They'll see if
Hamas takes it, knowing that they didn't even
show it to them yet. And then when
Hamas looks at it and goes, well, obviously,
it's a nonstarter. You're not even on this
right page. They go, I rejected it again.
The last time they had an agreement that
was close, Hamas was even willing to take
themselves out of the situation.
They said, we'll remove ourselves from the thing,
which is what what Israel claims they wanted.
And twice, The US and Israel reinserted that
language to keep them in Gaza.
It's pretty it's becoming pretty obvious that they
need this to finish out what they want.
They need the excuse of Hamas to keep
this going.
And so all we can do is just
lie to your face and make the lie
and what New York Post did was just
prior what Israel and the Zionists were saying,
which is that Hamas did it, just like
Blinken said, just like Trump has said, and
they've been lying to you every single time.
Now here's the article.
It says Nick Maynard, professor Nick Maynard, an
Oxford based gastrointestinal
surgeon
complete, currently in Gaza. That's as of right
now. Add I mean, imagine doing this still
with what he's seen. The courage is is
worthy of praise.
Added that snipers were deliberately
targeting
certain parts of the of of the of
different body parts on different days,
such as the head, legs, or genitals
near US Israeli run a distribution points.
And so on day one, they shoot the
head. Day two, they shoot the legs.
This is a game to them.
Professor Maynard said, quote, unprecedented levels of severe
malnutrition
were directly contributing to preventable deaths among patients
receiving surgery. He said the malnutrition I'm seeing
here is indescribably
bad. It's much, much worse than a year
ago. And a year ago,
they were already food insecure. Six months ago,
the IPF said it was,
the ICP? Was it the let me look
real quick. I still have the article. I
think it'll pop up.
There it is. IPC.
This was a while ago.
It's not loading? There we go.
1,100,000
people. Famine. Eminent.
This was a why I I forget what
the date is on here, but this was,
like, six months ago. So the point is
it has been there this entire time. And
his point is now it's worse than we've
ever seen,
which is wild.
That's where we're using the images to show
you as much as it's hard to wrap
your mind. It's hard to to see.
He added
that colleagues he worked with a year ago.
So doctors who are there
were unrecognizable
or barely recognizable, having lost 20 to 30
kilograms
due to food shortages. The
doctors critically, he said injured patients were dying
because malnutrition was preventing them from healing. So
they, some of them did actually get good
treatment if that's even possible where they are
with what they don't have are just simply
dying anyway because they don't have the they're
not their bodies are eating themselves alive. It
says the repairs that we carry out fall
to pieces. Patients get in terrible infections. They
die. I've never had so many patients die
because they can't get enough food to recover.
He said, I saw a seven month old
baby who looked like a newborn.
The expression the expression skin and bones doesn't
do it justice.
He said that professor Maynard added that snipers
appear to be targeting body parts, including genitals
and legs, near the controversial
health human the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
Quote, the medical teams here have also seen
been seeing a clear pattern of people being
shot in certain body parts on different days,
such as the head, legs, or genitals, which
seem to indicate deliberate
targeting.
He goes on. There's plenty more for you
to read.
Unbelievable.
Now this this is a really chilling
image.
What you're seeing here,
a scene from the ongoing Israeli genocide in
Gaza. With food supplies completely cut off, desperate
civilians are forced to scrape up flour mixed
with sand just to keep their families alive.
Not fiction. This is a horrifying reality. Now
ask yourself why that's the circumstance.
Why are these bags strewn about, broken open?
Because this is how they're doing this, guys.
These people are being shot at while they
do this. They're not being given I mean,
I just I can't even understand
how this can exist in this world.
It's over the top. You are treating these
people like they're in the I mean, this
is a Hunger Games dynamic.
These people are shooting at them as they
try to survive. You're doing it in a
way that is you're you're torturing them with
a scrap of food as their children are
starving to death.
Zachary Foster, Israel is starving to death. 500,000
pay Palestinians in Gaza right now. Here's what
the UN was saying.
Is worse than I've ever seen it before.
Starvation is spreading. Five hundred thousand people in
starvation. Ninety thousand children now in urgent need
of treatment for malnutrition.
And I met many of those families,
who told me that there are days that
their children are not eating at all. And
I had mothers telling me how they're trying
to have kids not play, so that they
don't draw more energy than they are able
to provide them with through food. The fact
that people are now dying every day trying
to get food, I think it's the starkest
illustration of how desperate, the situation
is. The amount that we are able to
bring in, it's just a fraction of what's
needed.
For a period after that blockade was lifted,
we were able to do
twenty, thirty trucks per day. That's far from
enough, and it has driven up the prices
of any basic commodity. The price of a
kilo of wheat flour was over $25.
They're all
Don't forget that this is because of the
ISIS linked gangs that Israel is working with
to do that. As Robert broke down beautifully
on an interview, I'll show you when this
is done.
Operating environment also for our teams is just
impossible. Our teams get stuck waiting, for clearances
and at checkpoints,
often spending between fifteen to twenty hours, straight.
There's not enough fuel. There is not enough
spare parts to our vehicles, and we don't
have basic communication. Today, though, we were allowed
to deliver through Sikkim
for the first time in in several days,
but we want to be able to deliver
in the North because we think that is
the way to also help bring down the
levels of desperation and prices. Regardless of this
progress that we have seen, it's not gonna
be enough to turn the tide of hunger.
That's for sure. So what we really need
is the ceasefire. We have enough food on
the borders to deliver to the entire population
for some two months. But obviously, we need
that ceasefire to take advantage,
and deliver to the entire population.
Here's the interview I did with Robert about
this. And we've talked about it before this.
It's very clear what's going on. We've talked
about these gangs in few different conversations. They
were they were the ones that were stealing
and selling the food at higher prices. The
point is that they've now worked with them,
and it came out very clearly that they
have clear links to ISIS. That was brought
up in Israel.
That's just and it shouldn't be surprising, especially
with the next conversation, seeing as how they
have quite literally taken the Al Qaeda offshoot
Hayat al Sham off the terrorist watch list.
Al Qaeda.
No one's denying that they're part of Al
Qaeda. Al Qaeda
is best it's it's a group that's just
been changed names a few times as Vanessa
and I have talked about. And it's obvious
that Israel and United States have always worked
with in fact, it's a proxy element of
both of them, ISIS and Al Qaeda. This
is not a secret if you've been paying
attention.
Now
last few points on Gaza. Aid for Gaza
starving children is right at the gates. Let
it in. This is from July 15. They're
letting these people suffer.
UN aid trucks
are waiting,
and they're still playing games by giving people
scraps and shooting at them. Here are children
that are literally starving to death in front
of your eyes. As you just heard, every
day, there are children dying.
Not by bombs, but specifically from god from
starvation.
Here is a sad, sad, sad
reality.
Aaron says, when was the last time we
have seen such a concerted campaign
to starve an entire civilian population?
A Palestinian child cries out in hunger as
famine worsens in Gaza, with Israel continuing to
block aid and weapons
weaponizing starvation in the Gaza Strip.
Makes me sick.
But just in case you needed to see
it even clearer,
this is the title of the article from
a genocide scholar,
or rather what he said. I'm a genocide
scholar.
I know it when I see it.
This is I'm oh, I guess that I
thought I thought that was something different. That
is the title.
A genocide scholar has just broken down that
what's going on in Gaza is a textbook
example of genocide.
Not news to 99% of the world, but
for those holdouts that still wanted to lie
to yourselves for political reasons, guys, it's obvious
what's happening. It is the most obvious genocide
I think the world has ever seen. And
now you have even more evidence to back
that up. Now in,
antiwar.com,
you might have already seen this. Israeli tanks
strike the only Catholic church in Gaza that
still exists. There's more. The point is they
tried to lie about that in the beginning.
Remember? The woman from Israel's political background the
what's her name? The politician? Tried to lie
to l LBC saying, there's no churches. And
he goes, yeah. There's one right here. And
he goes, oh, well, well, they don't go
there anymore. Yeah. Here's the here's the pastor.
Well, never mind. Like, they they lie as
a they lie like they breathe in the
Israeli political field
or just politics anywhere.
But
they targeted this church yet again. And this
was a a a,
one of the priests there was somebody who
called the pope near daily, as the reports
have said.
And they attacked it. And then because it
got so much negative attention, they spoke up
and said, oh, well, it was a mistake.
Didn't stop them from doing it, and they
don't care. They just only give you some
hollow response when it's enough people seem to
screw about it in positions of power.
Killing three, injuring a priest
every single day.
Hope
the conservative right can say something about that.
Now on top of that, don't forget. I'll
just include this. Decentral News put this out.
This is from a while ago, but it's
the conversation
of Israel's use of AI targeted creation platform,
HaBzora.
We were talking about this 12/24/2023.
How Israel uses AI to select bombing targets
in Gaza.
Gaza. We were talking about this before it
was discussed in the larger conversation. The point
is this is Whitney and I discussing this
and where this goes. Here's the link to
it,
to the inner, to the shit the interview
link for on TLav.
The cyber threat in the intelligence league and
its impending false flag with Whitney Webb.
Include that too. The point is just to
recognize that they're using in artificial intelligence in
the genocide, and that ties back to the
original point and where this is all really
going.
There's multi there's many objectives here. Some of
them are just genocide, just for the sake
of removing the people that they don't like.
But on top of that, there's always a
bigger point. And it's about where the world
is going,
and hopefully, we can start to see that.
Now to finish this in the point of
the larger picture, but as it pertains to
Syria,
But to recognize, guys, that this is a
greater Israel dynamic with Lebanon and Syria and
Gaza and Egypt.
And a lot of I mean, here, let's
look at it yourselves.
And let's actually, let's just go with this
first to make sure you remember this is
not a fringe secret.
The this TRT World put this out. This
is patches they were wearing after October 7
and have been before they are greater Israel
patches. That's what that is.
That's what the Israelis
government structure believes
is going to happen. So that means that
they openly believe, and that means they that
The US and they know this in the
world, that they want three fourths of Syria,
the vast majority of Iraq, a major part
of Saudi Arabia, all of Jordan. Right? Well,
a huge part of of Egypt.
I mean, it's just it's very clear to
half of Kuwait. It's very obvious that this
is where they're going. They're and and the
governments of the world that are clearly controlled
by them are carrying this out for them
at your expense.
Ask Syria, which is what this point is
about.
Here,
this was just put out yes fourteen hours
ago for Mencho Synth. It says occupation soldiers
patrol in the villages of Southern Syria today.
Guess what with a talmudic cube on their
head? In case you don't know what that
is, I'm sure you've seen it. Something that
Rabbi Schmooly and that ridiculous moron, Rob, Mike
Rapopore, love to throw in your face on
Twitter because they wanna really project what that
great you know, they're trying to first for
propaganda. Not to say that there aren't people
that are, you know, believing that they practice
their religion. It is a part of their
religion. My point is there are people that
love to throw it on Twitter for their
own purposes which is sort of in my
way or I guess, I'll put it this
way. From a Christian's perspective, there was somebody
out there which they exist especially in politics
and media
that are out there throwing their religious practice
in your face as if that mean like,
that makes them seem that's propaganda. That's for
that. That's your personal life. You don't need
to throw that people's faces. My point is
this,
just in case you didn't know that, is
something that does happen. It's very common.
And this
is a member of Al Qaeda.
The rulers the ruling faction of Pieter Al
Shom that is over is overlapping with Israel
and The United States in Syria, who's roaming
around
in the back of a, what looks like
a Us Jeep
with this gun, with the helmet, a cube
on his head.
Now look, is it possible that this
Muslim terrorist
believes in
the the Jewish with the Jewish religion? Certainly
possible. My point is it's obviously more than
that. Listen, as I see it, that this
is about the example that this is Zionism
taking over Syria to make it very simple.
A lot of moving parts, but the overarching
point in time, we don't need that to
prove it, as we'll show you right now,
that Israel is openly attacking Syria, openly occupying
Syria, and openly ethnically cleansing Syria. And the
very people that we're telling you were saving
Syria from the Muslim terrorists are now looking
the other way as the people that they
that work for them are in fact doing
that. And let's not forget the lie about
the Muslim terrorist dynamic, which is not to
say that they don't exist in every culture,
but that the idea,
the very reality of what we see as
Muslim terrorism in this world was started by
Zionism.
And that is a very important thing to
understand,
where it really comes from and what that
means. For example, with things like the
terror the the the suicide bomber,
That's Israel, guys. That's Zionism. That has, yes,
bled into plenty of things. Anyone can do
it. But the where the the origin point,
as this academic will tell you, is comes
from Zionism. The Zionists have used it and
brought it, in fact, the area. Terrorism as
we know it today, the planting of bombs
in marketplaces and so on and so forth,
was, in fact, introduced into the Middle East
by the Zionists in the twenties.
But the net result of of Zionist,
terrorism and and violence in the in the
first third of the
unacceptable status in The Middle East today of
the state of Israel, which is in fact
an armed garrison state,
which now exports more arms and distributes violence
all around the world,
vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in
that respect, I think it's a it's it's
a horrible cycle of of violence. But in
it all, I think the Palestinian is the
victim. It's no question about that.
So the point is, before we get into
in Syria entirely, is that this is what's
rolling out around it. And if you wanna
highlight a country out there that is determined
to topple you know, to take over things
around like the argument, if you if you
if you don't stop them in Gaza, then
you're next.
Right? They wanna tell you. Right? You don't
stop Hamas. You're next. They're gonna come to
your border. That seems like a bit of
projection, doesn't it? Seeing as how Hamas, aside
from the reality of being funded by Israel,
parts of it at the very least up
until October 7 or any other part we're
talking about, I don't
see them carrying out regime change. I don't
see them occupying foreign countries or Iran
or Russia
or China. Not to say that there's not
elements of their infiltration or whatever else, but
on the surface, you can see The United
States and Israel actively toppling and and and
occupying and regime changing and false flagging countries
all over the world. This is their stated
objective.
Now you have to ask yourself, you know,
why'd we have a coup in Egypt? Why
was there coup why are well, Saudi Arabia
is just a vassal state from the very
beginning, but we saw coups in Iraq. We
saw coups in Syria. We saw coups well,
now you know why, at least in large
part. And Iran
was always on that conversation. Now you can
argue it's about something else, but you you
can see that it does overlap at a
tiny part with Iran. The point, though, is
about, I think, the larger picture of what
they think is their adversarial direction with Iran
for a lot of different reasons.
Actually, I wanna hold on to that for
later.
So
here
oh, yeah. And this one too is important
to include.
Here's our show from December 10.
Right when this first started, as Israel further
occupied Syria, which is still disputed, I guess,
which is insane to me. They have basis
in Syria now.
Western backed ISIS patch wearing terrorists began executions
on video.
Publicly, this again is an image directly from
Syria right after they took over. That is
an ISIS patch. There's another one you saw
with the video of him executing Syrians.
None of this was happening under Assad despite
the narratives, not in the way that this
is happening now.
And Syrian girl on sixteenth, two days ago,
says Israel is bombing the suburb she grew
up in. This is what happens when you
don't fight Israel.
Here's BBC two days ago, US says specific
steps agreed to. And Syria violence after Israeli
strikes hit Damascus. Think about how dumb this
is to literally occupy and overtake a country,
let your terrorists just start ethnically cleansing people,
then bomb areas for whatever reason, whether
and and act like then you create a
ceasefire.
You're you're you're fighting yourself. Basically, you are
murdering innocent people and then stepping in to
act like a peacemaker.
I don't think anyone buys this outside of
the BBC and other media and blind politicians.
But my god, is it just obscene
the way they're always trying to frame themselves
as somehow the peacemaker. It's just like the
US government.
Now here's Netanyahu on the seventeenth yesterday
announcing how he is going to, quote, occupy
Southern Syria. That's in Hebrew. You can watch
for yourself. There's subtitles.
Netanyahu announces occupation from the Golan Heights to
the Druze Mountain area. Now this is why
you're starting to hear the idea that we're
gonna protect the Druze because they're expanding their
borders, and they need an excuse. I mean,
I'm actually surprised they even think they do
anymore. No one buys it, but they still
need to lie.
Welcome to greater Israel, Solomon points out.
This is what's happening.
So let's get into the Drew's point, which
is important as well. Here's the cradle. This
is from July 15.
This is the spiritual leader of the Drew's
community in Israel.
He says, we, quote, we are in contact
with members of the Druze community in Syria.
They are weeping.
Syrian regime forces are storming their homes, killing
them, beheading them, and humiliating them. Now realize
that's
Israeli Syrian that is the people that that
is that is Hayat Tir El Sham. So
I don't even feel like that represents Syria.
That is the people that they put there,
and they are then going after the Druze
community. The group the very community that Israel
pretend they're they are supported by, they're not.
But this and this is the Druze community
in Syria telling you that their people are
storming their homes, killing them, beheading them, humiliating.
It's ethnic cleansing. Just like we told you,
Israel and The US always seem to carry
out.
Now here,
Hadi points out horrific videos, this is from
the fifteenth, of Syrian regime jihadists executing Dru
civilians are surfacing all over the Internet.
Same gut wrenching scenes at the coastal massacres
months ago that left a 100 plus Alawites
dead, which we covered.
Doctor Fattan was shot near her hospital.
Fajir, Saeed, and Laath were executed in front
of their mother. It goes on, guys. And
on and on and on.
That's what they're doing. Now what's crazy is
that Israel is now acting like we need
to say we need to save these people.
Oh, I don't think I I guess I
didn't grab it. The point is that they're
now acting like we need to step up
and oh, that's what it was. Actually, I'm
sorry. I closed it before making that point.
The the image, the the video that Netanyahu
put out, that was the the last major
point on it is that ultimately, he needs
to protect the Drews.
Right? That's what he's claiming this is about.
We need to occupy this because I think
I did kinda say that because we need
to protect the Drews community,
Even though right when he's doing that, the
people that he works with are murdering them,
raiding their homes, and, you know, raping and
pillaging and torturing like we continue to see,
as the Drew's leader says. Now let's not
forget,
on August 6, I think that right before
that, the day before they are a couple
of day before, I think it was the
day before, as we titled the as Robert
titled the article, an Israeli false flag to
justify attacking Lebanon.
Remember, this was the Iron Dome back to
the whole Golden Dome dynamic that they have
in the area that more than once in
the past I there's a video right here.
This is one from 07/27/2024.
What does it show you? It shows the
Iron Dome in that same village launching in
the air and then firing back and landing
on them.
Just too quickly.
Right there. So the point is that's not
that's they they said was and you could
read more. It's video from March showing the
activity of the Iron Dome base hit behind
this
behind the mountain. At the same time, several
Iron Dome rockets failed and fell inside the
village and nearby. That's the point. K.
Which is what I think is kind of
always how this works. So the question is
this, if you remember, was the Druze community
chill a bunch of kids playing soccer.
The iron a a missile hit them all,
and they made it about Lebanon. Lebanon borrowed
the Jewish community.
No.
You could very quickly prove that that was
their Iron Dome missile. Now whether that was
an accident they decided to use or they
just did it to blame Lebanon, it's hard
to say. Either way, this is the very
community that they claim they wanna protect. And
at the time, even before this, when Netanyahu
tried to walk around, they literally kicked them
out of the area because they do not
want them there. That's public.
Now here is an article goes further back.
Whitney Webb wrote this in 2017.
Israel offers to occupy Syrian town to protect
Drew's population. Ah, you see, nothing is new
under the sun. They just sell you the
same narrative. And what do they want then?
To occupy the town. They want to expand
their borders. Now they're doing it under Trump
because they know they can get away with
it.
Now this is from, Robert in Lokesh from
September 2023.
Israel wants conflict in Syria's Suwaida to rekindle
devastating war. So same conversation about the same
areas. They're simply simply the the they're all
of them are simply highlighting that they just
want to find a way to accomplish this.
Now they're, going back to the same old
narrative. We have to protect them even though
they're the ones killing them. Now this is
an interesting overlap to this. This is from
the fifteenth. Syrian girls post is from the
eighteenth today. Mega Megatron says the new war
in Syria is in full swing.
The Israeli backed Druze, which is not the
same as just the Druze population,
are seceding from the new Syria
under control of ISIS and Al Qaeda. That's
the group they support, Hayatir al Sham.
As previously predicted, Syria will be divided into
several regions, which, by the way, was the
original plan. That goes back to the Balkanization
of The Middle East, the zig zig zig
zig zig zig zig zig zig zig zig
zig zig zig zig zigzinsky
from the seventies and detector technetronic state. I
mean, all the this is where they were
predicting this, what they wanted to accomplish.
The Kurdistan and the problem is that they
made a lot of promises to the Kurds
included, which I don't think are gonna come
to pass as always. Either way, the bottom
line is they are now creating the conflict,
which they will take advantage of. At least
that's what it seems like. And so they're
using the Druze population to create a civil
war.
Syrian girl says the same thing. Gangs of
Bedouin minorities
are heading to Suwaida, we just talked about,
to slaughter Druze minorities.
We are in the real civil war in
Syria now. Now, see, there's different opinions on
how it's playing out, but I see the
same thing. So it's not like in 2011,
by the way, which was a war of
nations on Syria under a guise of civil
war.
Israel will come in after they let this
play out, kill whoever's left, whoever it is,
and build settlements.
I agree with that.
I think this is whether this is just
a byproduct or not, that they don't care
about any of this. They just want these
people to get they'll kill and murder and
name whoever they want. They're creating conflict to
justify that presence forever. Same thing they do
everywhere else. Libya, anywhere else, guys. They are
reaping the benefits from anywhere. What do you
think's happened to the resources in these places
while they create conflict? They're taking them.
Just like we saw in Syria, they just
started,
trucking out all the oil and all the
resources. I showed you that at the time,
even though they got shouted down as fake
until it was later proven as usual ahead
of the story. The point is that this
is being manufactured,
but we're gonna jump in and save them.
Right?
Kevork Al Macian has been covering this for
a long time. He said this today.
What we're witnessing in Syria isn't just the
collapse of a state.
It's the deliberate
dismemberment
of a society
that once housed multiple ethnicities,
sects, and in identities under one national roof.
Remember, the third largest Christian population of all
the Middle East before
they wanted to liberate the country. Now
you can clearly see who's running it. The
actual Islamic terrorists or the people that pretend
to be that, however you look at it,
that they claim they were fighting, which is
the same everywhere else you look. It's like
we can't learn a lesson.
What's heartbreaking, he says, isn't the the carnage
that that is too, but he goes, but
the clarity that came too late for too
many.
Right?
People who genuinely thought that this change from
Assad was gonna be good for the Syrian
people because they bought the narrative.
For years, we tried to sound the alarm.
We tried to educate, open eyes, to offer
a deeper view beyond the binary narrative of
regime versus rebels,
but many didn't wanna listen.
Some out of fear, others out of convenience,
and many simply because the story didn't fit
the oversimplified
script of good guys versus bad guys.
Those of us who did see it coming,
those of us, those who warned about the
growing presence of jihadist extremists, the tech theory
fanatics
imported from Central Asia
to, Xinjiang to to Libya. Remember
the the whole rat line point from Libya
to Syria? They literally created this and used
it against Assad.
We're not just he said that,
he said those of us those of us
who did see it coming, who warned about
the growing presence,
were not just ignored. We were mocked, censored,
or demonetized.
But we were right.
Let's be brutally honest here. Coexistence with the
so called reformed Al Qaeda regime was never
going to be possible. The idea that Syria
could transition into some liberal democratic utopia while
foreign backed jihadists execute all white and Druze
villagers with impunity is not just naive. It's
insulting.
And in the vacuum,
the vultures descended.
Israel postured as savior. The US played geopolitical
chess and regional powers fueled their own fires.
Ordinary Syrians caught in a blender of dogma
and drones were left asking only for one
thing, just let us live.
When the bar for dignity becomes mere survival,
you know the experiment has failed.
To ignore the degenerative role of imported extremists,
disguised as freedom fighters
is to rewrite history with blood soaked hands,
which is always how long have I said
that? Which is not a new sentiment, but
I it's the the history is always written
by the winning hand,
which rarely means it's the full picture or
the truth. The people who win. Right? So
if you cheat, lie, and steal, and you
ultimately come out ahead, you get to dictate
how history remembers that.
Always.
It wasn't a simple civil war.
It was a controlled demolition of a nation
designed to produce either fragmentation or submission to
foreign influence. The plan wasn't botched. It was
executed to perfection.
Balkanization
wasn't the risk. It was the goal.
Time to make just acknowledge this and recognize
that it's not just this. It's the whole
thing, the whole big picture right now.
Now in case you think this is new,
oh, it's because of Assad or it's all
in cover set. No. Well, and Assad would
the timing would make sense, but because October
7 or whatever else.
This is from the cradle, 2024, and plenty
of others that simply reported what he said.
Quote, Jewish state will extend from Jerusalem
to Damascus,
says the Israeli finance minister in 2024.
Yes. Post October 7. The point is three
days. The point is this has always been
on the table. The moment this kicks off
post October 7, you're going Syria?
Obviously, this is bigger than it is an
excuse to do what they wanted. That's why
many still argue that this was allowed or
created.
Look at where we are. Now clearly didn't
go to plan or at least didn't work
out because the people are seeing through their
lies.
Lastly, Kevork also says seven months
were not enough, apparently, to find Assad's secret
chemical stockpiles.
He says we're being mocked. This is from
yesterday. The Israeli air attacks on Damascus.
This is what the Syrian Al Qaeda terrorists
are saying, what they call the government right
now.
The Israeli air strikes are hampering the, Syria's
effort to find and destroy chemical weapons.
Stockpiled during the rule of Bashar al Assad,
according to the new Syrian government.
Right. So the fact that your allies are
bombing the areas that you all want, that
that's why we can't find the chemical stockpile
that doesn't exist.
Seven months, they've been looking it's just it's
like I said, we're being mocked. Aaron Mate
rightly chimes in and says checking in on
all of those who shunned the OPCW
whistleblowers
and attacked those of us who reported on
the chemical weapons deception they exposed.
Aaron chief among them. Where is Assad supposed
a chemical weapon stockpile? Did he take it
with him on the plane to Moscow?
We have always been played. If you fall
for government narratives, guys. That's the real picture
here, is that it's all in the interest
of what's currently happening. And if I mean,
I the way I frame that, the way
I think is all of it.
Scientists, technocracy, Zionism, globalism, and it's it's one
blob as far as I can tell. And
maybe that's just by design now or other
I mean, by,
by necessity now because of how clearly it's
all kind of intertwined. I mean, maybe it
wasn't always that case, but look
look at what we just laid out today.
Look at the facts. Look for yourself. Look
at the source material.
It's never been this clear in all the
years I've been doing this, which is why
I think they're all kind of spiraling right
now. Flailing.
Clearly worrying me that it's just not working.
The narratives don't stick anymore.
That's my point in the beginning. There's an
opportunity right now. And that's why each of
us individually
need to strive to be better,
better than them, better than this, better than
the whole thing. Just be better.
Because if we strive to be better, if
we strive to be more moral and to
have integrity,
act with you know, follow your principles, actually
hold true to what you believe in, and
don't get swayed by partisan narratives,
maybe
we could take advantage of this moment.
I believe that. I wouldn't do this if
I didn't believe that. So thank you for
continuing to fight for the truth
because you're winning.
Thank you for being here. If you believe
in this platform, if you find value in
what we put forward, we do this for
free. We put the information out because we
believe in it
and don't expect anything back,
but we couldn't continue to do this without
your support. So if you find value in
it,
show me what it's worth to you. We
have plenty of ways down below to support
this platform from Cash App to buy me
a coffee, to direct donations on our website,
do any number of different things. Bitcoin donation.
If you believe in this platform, if you
support the work, help us continue.
I love you all as always. Question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.