It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Saturday, 07/12/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Had a
little YouTube issue to start there. Sorry for
the delay. These days, they tend to kinda
trip us up as we get started sometimes,
and I have to jump to another pirate
channel. So sorry for those that are there.
If you're still on YouTube, the question is
why.
But let's get started today. Very important follow-up
to this whole Epstein just chaos.
I mean, it it is really
I mean, it is it's not really unexpected.
A lot of people have been seeing this
building,
the the kind
of crumbling of the two party the partisan
hold on a lot of people. So the
title in general today, obviously, is is that
focal point, not just Epstein,
but
Epstein and the Israel issue around it. Is
that lie
breaking apart the two party illusion right now?
Like, the final, like, the, you know, the
final nail in the coffin.
I feel like we've been seeing this come
for a long time, but I really genuinely
think because of the previous few agendas that
I think have fallen flat, but right now
more than ever, it is just completely ripping
apart. But maybe it's sort of by design.
We saw the third party float from Elon
Musk.
Maybe it's both. Very much have to consider
that today. But it's gonna be an important
conversation as it goes over that larger point.
But as we follow-up on what's going on
with the Epstein story, we follow-up on what's
going on with Israel's connection to that. But
But a lot of other points we're gonna
get into in the beginning that I think
are really relevant to all of this. But
as usual, we frame the title as something
I think is maybe the general focal point.
But for those that don't you know, for
the title skimmers out there who who don't
really watch the show but try to present
what they think it's about, they never really
understand that we talk about so much more
than what's just in the title.
That's why it's a long show. We go
through quite a lot.
So we're gonna start today with an important
conversation around, well, immigration that I think is
important because that definitely relates to a lot
of what we're seeing today, but really just
some catching up points around Garcia and a
few other moving parts in the Supreme Court
rulings and what's happening around all that and
a major part about ICE. Because I think
the ICE national police dynamic that's building out
is very important to a few other larger
points we're gonna make around,
I mean, the the technocratic
drive, but an interesting overlap that we talked
about during the World Economic Forum, COVID nineteen,
build back better conversation, which was the biodigital
convergence.
An interesting video that was sent to me
from the FDA perspective talking about the digital
convergence. I thought it was important to bring
that into light
around where this is going. And a great
post that Orwell sent me around drones and
another a company building this whole ecosystem of
control out.
All of this, as I think you've seen
before, as I've discussed over the not recently,
but a lot over the years, how all
this ties back in together with what's happening,
where it's building toward, what's always been going
on, and how that then relates with this
interesting kind of breakdown of the partisan conversation
and then what they're doing in response to
that. It's I mean, it's as much as
I've I've said this a lot over the,
I don't know, probably six months or more,
and it's a classic idea, you know, the
darker before the dawn kind of idea, that
we're gonna see this get more intense.
If, I mean, if I it's happening what
I think is happening, which I think is
becoming very clear to most, that it will
get more intense. It's gonna get worse in
a lot of ways because a power structure
that is losing power is not going to
make it easy for you. It's not gonna
stand up and say, oh, you got us.
We were wrong. You can see it. We'll
give up. It's gonna be more difficult and
more but my point in saying all that
is that we're on a positive path even
if it feels terrible,
uncomfortable. Because change can be uncomfortable, but it's
the change that we're all seeking, the positive
shift away from this broken structure that we're
in. So to think of it that way,
make sure you know, to stand back and
look at it as a positive flow of
change,
it it makes it you know, it's at
very least, it's easier to understand
why everything feels the way it does and
why people can feel so desperate, why people
can act so irrationally
because their entire worldview is falling apart in
front of them. And, you know, at the
same time, try to find some compassion
for people out there that are as much
as they may have been smug and indifferent
and whatever it is or not, try to
find some compassion for the people that are
really having a difficult time trying to grapple
with what's happening. Their entire world is falling
apart in front of them. You know, and
and that is a a downside in the
long run to what this is, but it
will be better in the long run, I
argue, for everyone, including them, to see beyond
what has controlled their lives all this time.
But, hopefully, we I mean, question all of
that. Don't take what I'm saying at face
value. Consider what I'm saying as we go
through it. But either way, hopefully, we can
see some awakening to long held lies. And
I think that's a bigger part of what
we're talking about.
But let's let's get into this and then
all of that, of course, as it overlaps
with Epstein and stuff we talked about. But
let's start with a a shout out to,
Sal the Agarest, always doing great work. It's
where I got this image from. I'm not
sure if it was him something he made.
He just simply posted it with no commentary.
Nonetheless, wanna shout out where I saw it.
It obviously, an AI image of of Trump
giving Epstein the medal of honor with Netanyahu
kind of looking from the side. You know?
And and it's what's interesting about this whole
thing,
this is not about one person or one
it it it is such a bigger kind
of just blob nebulous blob of evil I
think we're watching,
you know, in its own ways, kind of
floundering for more control even if it's not
staying with the same agenda. My point saying
all that though is that, remember,
Netanyahu, Trump, even Epstein,
these are more so apparatuses, symptoms.
Maybe not symptoms, but parts of a larger
whole. And I think it's really important to
think of it like that because of Trump,
as much as some people may put him
up on a pedestal,
is really just one element of a control
structure. I don't even think he's fully aware
of how he's being used at the end
of the day. But Epstein, as much as
it was a major a major development and
awareness you know, moment of awareness,
It is just one piece of this larger
thing. And that's why we're we're gonna related
it to Israel and how our country is
dealing with that and the people becoming aware
of that. Why that's breaking the partisan game
is because as maybe you're new to this
conversation, but we've been really harping on this.
Israel, amongst other countries, by the way, if
not all the governments we could probably talk
about, use
manipulation.
What is the what is the name of,
the Mossad state? Through
deception, thou shalt create war or some paraphrasing
point. That's what the the tagline is. Not
that that's much different than the CIA, but
CIA, but recognize that the sexual blackmail dynamic
that was exposed through this, that is the
Israeli think discussion. That's coming from the rather
the larger point, and there's evidence around all
of that proof, if not,
rather, of Israel doing that. But in this
larger conversation, the point is knowing that Israel
is conducting types of operations, whether or not
Israel is using that to take control, influence
our government.
Now with that question, stand back and look
at the overwhelming amount of evidence of every
politician,
APAC funding, and the statements they make that
seem counter to their interest, standing up for
Israel at a time when everyone can see
them committing genocide, you know, it really becomes
self evident,
embarrassing to not be honest about at this
point. And that is what I think is
truly causing trouble for people that
are kind of grappling between blind support for
the team they think is better than the
other side and acknowledging
that that team is supporting
whatever you think this is, pedophiles, deep state.
And I don't know how you can keep
those thoughts to the both those thoughts at
the same time. That's what cognitive dissonance is.
It's quite uncomfortable.
But shout out to Sal for pointing this
out. Just kinda being, I think, the the
right commentary.
Now we're gonna get into some important things
before we get to the Epstein overlap and
Israel.
And I think all of these do relate
as always. That's why I try to put
them together. But just so you know that
that part is gonna be probably halfway through
the show. We're gonna go through that in-depth.
But you already know what's going on if
you followed our last show. But we're gonna
talk about a few things to start, like
I said, immigration and getting into some some
health conversation, EPA, fluoride,
geoengineering,
mRNA shots, even a conversation that overlaps with
Pam Bondi and the Epstein's
in in regard to Pfizer.
Hoping hopefully connecting some dots for people that
show you this is much bigger than just
even Epstein's story. It is a broken government
structure that doesn't care about you on either
side of the paradigm. But before we get
to that, a point about some lawfare.
Now we've talked about this a lot over
the years. I've or out the years over
the what? So year, probably, months around me
being sued, our t lab being sued, illegitimately
around claims of copyright, which I've I've
gone over this many times in the show,
not divulged back into it now.
We are being taken advantage of, and we
ultimately won, at least in the one case.
The rest have seemed to have vanished, which
says something because we won in a way,
but we lost because we still have to
spend well, I think it over it's still
right now, it looks like it's gonna be
just over $50,000, which I've said before, in
regards to spending this for the lawyers, for
the back and forth, all the different mediation,
and winning
because they lost money, but ultimately still lost
because we spent all that money to fight
it, which was the whole point. This is
the show we did about that to make
sure you saw at TLAB Lawfare with one
of the groups right there on the front.
The reason I'm bringing it up today is
because I found it really relevant to think
about a couple of points that stood out
to this before we go into everything else,
which one was all of this started just
on, like, a waterfall,
four different lawsuits coming off of different, you
know, argue two different or, actually, three different
law groups, but all related to the same
general conversation, each of which had to do
with the Epstein and Israel were the main
focal points of this entire thing on all
of the lawsuits,
which is interesting. Right? Now we see now
this is coming out, and what's going on
with this really, very telling timing of this
all happened right after October 7.
And all and then after we won this
last one, which they ultimately ended up winning
about a thousand bucks from us that I
settled out with them, and they spent, my
lawyer told me, probably over a $100,000
to fight for that. Somebody put them to
this, and I think that's very obvious. Remember,
I even showed you one of the,
documents that was sent to me that was
signed in Hebrew, almost to make a point,
from a New York law firm. Very strange
thing to do in my opinion. But the
point is I think it's relevant interesting and
relevant to think about why this was happening.
It's probably happened to hell of a lot
more people than just TLF, That they are
out there right now trying to suppress and
threaten and use lawfare to scare people away
from pointing out the obvious. But, again, think
about this in the context of where we
are now. And what I mean, this is
just one small example, but think about what
what anybody who wants to stop something from
happening or people who are powerful are doing
to people in our governments, if this is
what's happening to random average podcasters.
Now I also wanna highlight before we get
into everything else. On the next show we
do, hopefully, tomorrow, but going to be very
soon,
follow-up on Israel in general. There's a lot
I was gonna get to around Gaza and
that food line. The the the same old
thing, the never ending genocide that continues to
get worse every single day. Horrible things. But
one that I didn't want you to miss
in regard to the larger picture that does
relate to what we're talking about today. This
was a major story. Here's the actual article
from the Jerusalem Post. I just didn't the
Jerusalem Post. I didn't want anyone to miss
this.
Survivors testify.
Members of the Knesset
participated in sadistic ritual sexual rituals involving minors,
and this goes back a long way. Multiple
testifying
multiple people testifying involves peep members of congress,
policemen.
I mean, it it's it's wild. And people
in the Knesset stood up and called this
a watershed moment. There's a problem here. And
we talked about this in this clip where
I broke it down from the re previous
show, which also goes into some of the
other points around the different conversation.
For example, that,
reports from around the world have said that,
Israel's becoming a, a,
that's the wrong article. I'm trying to think
of the term they use. The a safe
haven for pedophiles. This title you're seeing says
many accused Jewish pedophiles in The US flee
to Israel. And then, of course, the latter
part the other part about the IDF and
how their sexual abuse has only gotten worse
despite the reports went from one in six
to one in three women being abused in
the in the IDF over the process of
four or five years even though it was
being called out.
This is being included because of what we're
talking about today and showing you that this
is and it's not about every Jewish person
or every Israeli, but it is clearly about
the power structure that has allowed this to
fester and grow.
Very important. Now that's not these three I
didn't bring it up just to point it
out again because of this as well and
the Epstein overlap and the sexual blackmail dynamic,
but Mint Press News on the ninth,
breaking. 10 Israeli soldiers have been arrested for
sexual assault.
The Israeli military police have arrested the soldiers
who were part of Israel's air defense units
for sexually assaulting younger soldiers.
This is not new, guys. And here, I
could probably
since I mentioned it,
just on the video, I'm sure I could
show you
the articles I was referencing, which I believe
one was from times of Israel.
And it goes into the history
right there. Right? So here's just one of
them anyway. A third of Israeli female soldiers
were sexually harassed in 2021.
That went up that went up from one
in six in 2019,
I think? The other article's in there. So
the point is,
this is now 07/09/2025,
and you have 10 soldiers being arrested for
sexually abusing younger soldiers.
Do you think that a power structure cares
about these things when these things are so
blatant and only get worse?
That's an that's a question. I don't know
for sure, but I certainly have an opinion.
Maryam Barghouti on the tenth, the next day.
According to interviews done by Save the Children,
the majority
the majority of Palestinian children that were taken
into Israeli military detention by Israeli soldiers were
subjected to sexual violence or had to watch
another child be subjected to sexual violence.
This is insane, she writes. I concur.
What's more insane is that Save the Children
has not yet dropped the report and shared
it widely.
They have previously shared updated reports on Palestinian
detainee children and what they're subject to by
Israelis. Yet this year, when it is most
crucial to document and share these crimes, they're
holding on to the report.
They have crucial testimony, and this needs to
be shared. These are testimonies that were shared
by children to push for accountability,
not to have their,
to rats have to relive their trauma to
some international organization just so they could withhold
it from the public. The point is this
stuff is everywhere. Now there's many reasons why.
Maybe they're trying to make sure it goes
at a time when it actually will get
seen. Maybe it's because they're being threatened. Maybe
because they're not working for the truth. It's
all possible. The bottom line is this never
stops. We and this shouldn't even be bucked
at with said t said Tianan and raping
male adult soldiers and being
cheered on by their mainstream media arguing that
that's supposed to be what's happening.
The reports about children being abused in these
prisons in Israel, and by the way, why
children are in military prisons in the first
place, same old question, same answer. This goes
back well before October 7.
It it's just un
it's unnerving to see that this is being
allowed by the very people that we're pretending
or that that outwardly pretend to be fighting
for freedom and liberty and safety and equality
and then absolutely support the worst of the
worst of the worst of the worst everywhere
you look. Now this just as some breaking
news. Right before I went live, I saw
this. Just to include it, we'll talk about
it in the next show. Israeli strike on
a US nonprofit
clinic.
Kills at least kills at least 15 in
Gaza.
A nonprofit clinic. But, you know, that's it's,
you know, Hamas and Human Shields, human
tunnel, you know, whatever. Are we are we
done talking about it? Can everyone just move
on? Do we even have to give an
excuse anymore? That's what Israel's thinking right now.
Nobody seems to care outside of the people
that everywhere care. I'm talking about the power
structures. We all see it. They know we
all see it. They all keep doing it.
Nothing happens.
That's the story.
What can you do? What can you do
to make something happen? That's the question you
should be asking yourself. What can I do
to make this stop?
I'm not ever talking about violence or anything
illegal. The bottom line is this
is never ending, and they're murdering people
with just blithe indifference knowing you know what
they're doing. Our politicians are supporting them knowing
you know what they're doing.
This is all relevant to what we're talking
about today, guys. They don't care about what
you're seeing because they're not working for you.
I don't know how much clearer this can
be. Now what's interesting, by the way yeah.
Let me play this right now just because
this certainly seems to be relevant, and we'll
come back to it. This is the we're
gonna get to the the Tucker overlap and
maybe, you know, we'll we got a lot
to get through today. Maybe we won't get
to everything.
But this clip with Tucker and, what is
his name? Say, Sager
from, you know, you know, crystal ball and
and and what's his name on breaking points,
I believe. They're talking about in this in
this interview
about Israel and the bigger conversation, but something
James Lee discussed
highlights is what he argues, which I you
know, you know my opinion about Tucker. I
I don't I I he's doing work right
now that I think is important, that I
do think is reaching people. I do not
trust the intention. That's my my my opinion.
Never disregard the work if it's if you
think it's important whether or not you think
the intentions are true. That's the point about
opportunism and the truth just mattering. But call
out what you think is intent or not
or your opinion about it, which I do.
My point, though, is that this is important
regardless of his intention, but consider why the
truth can be used or how it can
be used,
especially when they know you're paying attention. Right?
When all of a sudden everyone starts to
see through something, those are when certain people
jump ahead using the truth to get you
to support them for future manipulations.
You know this stuff happens. Doesn't mean we
should assume that everyone telling the truth is
dishonest,
but question it, guys. It's all it comes
down to. My point is this clip here
is talking about why they think this is
happening.
Now Tucker is clearly being
kind of categorized as, like, someone
calling this out, and he is. And now
on some somehow not the Tucker the the
Trump team in a way, which I find
really interesting.
But the idea that they're doing this because
they're telling the world, the bad people of
the world, we have your back.
I mean, how else can you see this
right now? Whether it's with Israel and the
genocide, whether it's with everything they're doing, supporting
and and and suppressing the Epstein information. They're
they know you see them, guys. Their base
sees them. And yet, they are standing strong.
They're saying we're doing it because they know
they get the support of this dark
structure, whatever you wanna call it, whatever you
think it is, the the the bad in
the world
that keeps them in power.
Consider this. To listen to this exchange between
Tucker and Sager because they expose the exact
purpose why the Trump administration
has to cover up the Epstein files. Or
their argument. Right? That not consider this. They
could be lying. They could be wrong as
always.
The whole thing that this tape shows he
didn't kill himself is like a joke. But
worse than that, it's a joke that we
all get. Like, they're not fooling anybody. So
I feel like we're at a dangerous point
now. Yeah. I agree because the lie is
more it's not the lie at this point
is not even part of trying to convince
any of this is true. Yes. Yes. The
lie is a signal to everybody else involved
in the scheme that to the so the
ultimate ends, the United States government will go
to protect all of you. Yes. And that's
the quest Man, that's that smart. Purpose. Can
you say that again? Yes. It's I'm sorry.
It's a Am I crazy, or is that
not complicated at all? This is this is
what I get suspicious about.
The this whole grant you know, this gosh,
gee, golly, break it down for like, it
feels dishonest to me. I I mean, listen
to it again. I think it's very simple.
They're simply saying to the people that are
bad that we support you, not the people
that we claim we support, and we have
your back.
So keep us in power.
Point now. Yeah. I agree because the lie
is more it's not the lie at this
point is not even part of trying to
convince any of this is true. Yes. The
lie is a signal to everybody else involved
in the scheme. The lie is a signal
to everyone else involved in the scheme. That
to the to the ultimate ends, the United
States government will go to protect all of
you. That we will do anything to support
you.
Does that not seem like the most basic
sentiment in the world? So why does it
need to be this year? That's such a
smart, in-depth deep I just find that weird.
Now regardless, it's a good point to make,
to consider rather. Is it that the US
government is simply
telling the world
that we will support all of your evil
schemes? We'll support the Israeli genocide. We'll support
or, you know, not in, like, a broad
sense, but specifically to the group we're talking
about, whether that's Israel or whoever else is,
you know, dictating what we're talking about in
regard to the sexual blackmail, in regard to
the globalist technocratic whatever it is.
I think that's a valid point to consider.
And I and quite frankly, why I'm saying
it's not that complicated is because it's what
we've all been saying for a very long
time, but I'm glad it's being discussed right
now. And that's the quest for
what purpose. Can you say that again? Yes.
It's I'm sorry. It's a signal.
The lie is not for you and me.
The lie is for those implicated to say,
no matter what, we will protect you. And
then we have to start asking the question,
why? As in, what is the purpose of
this entire thing? Why does it matter that
it happens right before the Israeli prime minister
comes to Washington for the third time? Oh,
a lot of noticing going on in that
last part. And the timing of that, definitely
not a coincidence. I mean, it's basically undeniable
at this point that this story is about
intelligence. Mhmm. Specifically, Epstein's ties to a certain
foreign intelligence.
That's why we have to keep asking about
Epstein because our national sovereignty is literally at
stake here. I agree.
I I think that's a good video. I
think James Lee's doing good work. It's, you
know, pointing out what's important. But I think
what's interesting is to see the way that
people are, you know, the the the information,
how it flows around the story. It doesn't
have to be a nonstop string of we've
been talking about this for years, but it's
important to remember that, guys. Or Whitney's books
themselves. Like, you don't realize that literally every
major develop it's all right there. They're sitting
right on my shelf. Like, it's not hard
to know this stuff if you've been paying
attention. So that's not again to say that
we should dismiss where this is going and
who's seeing it, but just ask yourself just
like with COVID nineteen.
You know who are all of you out
there know exactly what I'm talking about. The
people who stood up and started saying, we
see it, and they're trying to hurt you,
and then suddenly swung it around to selling
you mRNA shots. Right? That's how this always
works. So just keep that in mind.
So we're gonna come back to that. I
just felt that was a good time to
play that clip with the point I was
making there. But I'm gonna try to do
this reasonably quickly, not to the stuff's unimportant,
but because this is not the focus today.
But we'll get back to that in one
minute. Now consider how all of these things
overlap with the larger point today. Now in
regard to immigration and Garcia, I don't want
you to miss this. Gilmar Gregor Garcia could
be deported to Mexico or South Sudan. You
know, the places where literally, like, specifically to
Sudan that the US government has warnings for
Americans to go to because it's not safe,
but telling us that it's okay because it's
a safe haven for them.
Now this alleviates the concern from the original
point that they weren't allowed to remove him
to El Salvador,
which was the only real original point that
our
structure cared about. Even though the real point
for me was never about that at all,
disregarding supreme court as much as that's important,
but about the fact that he was never
given due process that everyone is afforded, illegal
alien, green card holder, visa holder, in the
process of either any of those things or
American citizen alike. That's the fact. So the
point is that now bringing him back and
doing this fake dog and pony show and
maybe saying to South Sudan is rightly as
we've already discussed, is rightly very suspicious, and
I think it's it's clumsy. They're just trying
to give you a fake process. Whatever rules,
they're gonna send him away anyway, which makes
no sense. Then why give a process? Which
everyone's picking up on. But this is just
them saying, you know, kinda letting the cat
out of the bag about where he may
go. Judge now schools department
just department for, quote, refusal
to detail deportation plans for Garcia. Like, this
is you know, basically, they were forced to
be clear about it, but they're trying to
be they're dishonest in everything they're doing, acting
like they have to somehow be dishonest because
they're secretly trying to trick us into something
that's wrong. The only thing wrong happening here
is the way the current administration is dealing
with any of this.
On top of that, judge signals she will
protect DeBrige Garcia from hasty second deportation. So
just quickly updating you where this is going,
that is as of today and or yesterday.
And the point is that they're simply saying,
you know, we see what you're doing. We're
not gonna let this happen. But so far,
they haven't really cared a lot about what
the courts have been saying. Now Melnick also
points out that that this is in regard
to car Garcia as well. Kyle Chaney reports,
judge Zenas comes in hot this morning after
DOJ fails to produce the ICE detainer to
keep him locked up, Garcia.
She won't take the DOJ's word that it
exists. They came in literally just expecting them
to go, yeah. We've got it back there
somewhere, so go forward. They need to present
this. It says, quote, you have taken the
presumption of regularity and you've destroyed it in
my view, which is actually really crazy from
a legal perspective as he says, hard to
express to nonlawyers just how shocking it is
to see a federal judge telling the Department
of Justice that they've destroyed
the presumption of regularity. It's basically a bedrock
rule of federal courts that the federal government
gets this presumption.
Because they know they keep lying about basic
things, seems to no longer exist.
What it's showing you is the way that
they're trying to be dishonest about this. They
have gained this from day one for their
benefit at the expense of everybody, including Americans
who think they're getting what they want. You're
being played, and this is not about that,
especially since they've already released and dropped the
charges on all the leaders of MS thirteen
because, of course, Bukele made a deal with
them. Oh, yeah. That lie they sold about
how they turned it into a a freedom,
a bastion of freedom in that country because
they got rid of the Democrats and the
woke. No. What they did is they made
a deal with the fascist,
you know, whatever. They a deal with the
gangs They they told you they were gonna
fight, and that's why it pretends to be
safe. I mean, it's just that's what they're
doing across the world right now. Whether it's
technocracy, Zionism, or just good old fashioned
imperialism and authoritarianism,
they're
trying to remake the world in that image
while while giving you a fake what's the
right what's the best way to frame that?
You know, giving you a fake image of
what it looks like, but trying to remake
it in an authoritarian way. I mean, it's
everywhere you look right now.
Mark Levin comes in and says, only in
America does a POS like this.
Meaning,
mama Khalil, you know, the guy with no
criminal record who has a, I mean, squeaky
clean record who ultimately works with people everywhere
who have the highest opinion of him. I
mean, it's just insane to watch what these
monsters will do. Mark Levin from Fox News,
you know, the the rabid Zionist that he
is, trying to make this guy into a
POS.
Why? Because he supports Palestine, which is literally
the only thing they can throw at him,
but they just turn that into hate Jews
and and then lies about cornered people in
their library and chanted with pals, hates you
know, it's just lie after lie after lie,
all of which has been proven to be
false. Why? Because they had to force out
these things through the court process. All the
lies they spun about what they did didn't
hold up. That's why he's not in jail.
And people like this don't care about the
truth. They care about Mark Levin and the
Zionist agenda. And so they say this POS,
only in America does an an innocent person
who is falsely charged turn around to bring
a $20,000,000
lawsuit against the country? Yeah. I shouldn't say
only in America, but in fact, you're making
the exact opposite point. What you're trying to
highlight is that in this country, you don't
want innocent people to be able to turn
around and sue a authoritarian government for trying
to unjustly charge them because this guy is
not fighting for America. I think that's pretty
obvious. But good for him for standing up
and suing Trump for what they did or
suing the Trump administration
for what they did to this man.
I mean, if you were still out there
trying
to create nonsense trying to claim that this
guy deserves anything he got, then you're either
a disgusting person, a wildly uninformed naive child,
or a Zionist.
Because he's it's just it's it's the same
as trying to pretend like Ozturk is somehow
justifiably arrested because they support Palestine.
You're losing. I hope you guys know that.
Aramelnik points out, wow. This thread makes clear
just how much DeSantis
lied about Alligator Alcatraz.
You wanna know how? The same way they've
lied about damn near everything else they're doing.
Because if they claimed it was the worst
of the worst,
Florida Highway Patrol is doing clearly pretextual arrests,
window tints, seat belts, not a joke, and
sending every undocumented immigrant they stop to this
camp in Alcat Alligator, Alcatraz.
Worst of the worst. No. No. No. The
the leaders of The US 13, yeah, they
let them go. They're going after anybody they
can to snow a bunch of blind following
Republicans who don't understand they're being played and
the rest of the people that don't care.
That, I don't think, is even the majority,
close to a majority, of conservatives. They're all
calling the South, not this topic, but everything
else around Epstein
and slowly, hopefully, recognizing what this was actually
about. Now this is you doing still breaking
down some very important just hypocrisy.
Many of this many, of these examples are
swinging around. This is Paul a
Stuzpula.
First, it says, US citizens won't be deported.
Ana Navarro is lying to fearmonger.
But in terms of deporting all the illegals,
heck yeah. Despite the fact that the vast
majority they've they've gone after have not been
illegal and most of them have no criminal
record. But it says on the '20 on
the July 10, today would be a great
day to legally deport Zoran
Mamdani, you know, an American citizen. Who cares,
though? You know? It's it's all about what
Trump says we're supposed to think today. Right,
guys? Doctor Simon Godex says the US government
is actively covering up the biggest foreign backed
child trafficking and blackmail operation in modern history.
And what we what are conservative influencers talking
about? Not Epstein, not Mossad, not the intelligence
agencies involved. They're posting about deporting immigrants.
You can't make this up. Well, you can.
They're following orders. The the crazy thing about
this is that why do you think the
focal point is on the immigration?
How long have I been telling you about
the Israeli
overlap to weaponized migration?
I'll grab this one. We just talked about
this.
Just that one. Leave it at that. There's
plenty I could pull up. Weaponized migration and
experimentation. Tools for subversion, division, and manufacturing consent.
Now what's crazy is most Republicans agree with
that. They just don't wanna point at Israel
or have been misled by the Kirks of
the world to think that's not what's going
on. But he says, well, you need more
deportation. That's this is what you're gonna get
from them. These these like, I'll I'll show
you in a minute. The the let's bring
up the Clintons and and anything else like
I talked about with Elon Musk and Twitter
before. You know, pedophiles and
all of which things there are relevant points
to be made, but they are literally trying
to get you with buzzwords and reactionary points.
I mean, how I'm I wouldn't be surprised
if you start bringing up all the things
he brought up in the first election.
But you can see them all doing this
right now.
Here
is another example of oh, yeah. Well, the
first of all, this is where where I
would come back to the two party illusion.
The
ICE overlapped all of this as they're screaming
for more deportations and driving forward the authoritarian
police state that's rapidly growing in this country.
Federal judge orders the DHS to limit what
they're calling roving patrols in Los Angeles.
The judge finds that the evidence shows the
DHS officers are racially profiled people, which, guys,
I mean, nobody
everyone knows that. This this funny thing is
the ones that pretend it's not happening are
secretly going, yeah, because they're the bad ones.
They're all illegals, in my opinion. The reality
is it's unbelievably
clear even for their own statements that they're
racially profiling.
And it says to demand their papers. Remember
they told you the papers, please, dynamic, stop
and frisk? They told you that's what they
wanted. It's not secret. All of which is
unconstitutional.
They say which he he writes, which all
sides agree is illegal and orders DHS to
stop these unlawful practices.
So I'm just showing you they're just randomly
stop and frisk based on your skin color.
That's been happening nonstop. On top of that,
Donald Trump now declares, as of today,
total authorization
for ICE agents.
So, I mean, look. I know there are
smart conservatives out there that maybe completely disagree
with me about what's happening with immigration. That's
okay. Maybe I'm wrong. But I know you
know this is bad.
That somewhere in you, knowing, giving this much
power to any force, any any authority figure,
it it goes right back to the founding
ideals of this country. And I know you
know that. It doesn't matter what the narrative
is. Like with COVID, you don't say, you
know, shall not be infringed except when there's
a pathogen. It's the same argument. Guys, and
you know that.
So this gets bad. President Trump has granted
federal immigration agents total authorization to defend themselves
following clashes with protesters during a recent enforcement
operation, which we're gonna talk about in the
next show, most likely the next show.
Really, we've talked about the broader points of
what this topic is. It's about how it's
being misrepresented,
used by partisans, but there's so much to
get through today. It was a cannabis farm,
a legal, legal cannabis farm, by the way,
which they all wanna pretend isn't the case
or is irrelevant somehow because they're, I guess,
the token republican cartoons that still think marijuana
is bad for you. But the point is
that in California, there was immigrants.
I believe illegally. I haven't gone depth in-depth
into it, but it didn't surprise me. There's
illegal immigration all of this country that Trump,
in many ways, will tell you is okay.
Farms and hotels and leisure, that's all okay.
But the moment it happens in a way
we can go after Gavin Newsom, oh, my
god. Kids at a farm. Which, again, law
matters. Okay? If they're there illegally and you
are forced to live in the state of
society, well, then, yes. In then they should
be held accountable for that. But the way
they've spun this into, like, almost like a
borderline human trafficking narrative is insane
while they're ignoring Epstein and an actual human
trafficking network. It just shows you how lazy
this is. Now, it would have been a
good point to get into today, but it's
it's sort of redundant for a lot of
reasons, but we will talk about it. One,
because of the cannabis point. You know I
can't ignore that. But we'll come back to
it. The point is simply to understand a
legal farm in California where they arrested,
illegal immigrants and, apparently, there were children there
that were working on the farm, and they've
kinda spun this into that larger story.
Now it's relevant for the obvious legal issues
that are there. My point is obviously about
Trump and the way he's engaging with areas
just exactly like this in places that he's
okay with. So if he's able to go,
you're not a bad illegal immigrant because you
work on that farm, why is this one
any different?
Because Charlie Kirk decided so?
Seems pretty stupid at the end of the
day. Right? We'll come back to it, though.
But the law is law, and it should
be applied equally and fairly, which is clearly
not what's happening
from Trump's
own mouth. But
it says he had watched in disbelief as,
quote, thugs were violently throwing rocks and bricks.
Okay. So you have people protesting and angry
they came to arrest
a illegal aliens or and I believe the
overlap is more than that. I think there
are people that were not necessarily here illegally.
They got swept up in it like always.
The point, though, is people throwing rocks at
these at people in authority for doing what
they think is wrong.
Oh my god. It's a bombshell. Like, of
course, what he's doing is the the the
Israeli tactic. You throw a rock, then we're
gonna attack you.
I thought we were supposed to be demonstrating
that that's not how we are to the
world. Right? I thought it was wrong to
attack protesters whether like, here's the point. If
they break the law, which is the way
they're gonna frame this, then arrest them. If
they're a rock at the car, good. Charge
them with vandalism. The idea that you're gonna
turn this into some massive like, here's my
promise to you. That if this happens, they're
gonna go after anyone they can in that
group to the to well beyond what the
law should be. Deportation, removing citizenship, including potentially
American citizens, if they happen to be naturalized.
And in many cases, as Trump has even
floated, even if they're born here.
So recognize how that this is turning with
ICE that has a police budget that's more
than most militaries in the world. And the
idea that you're now telling them you have
total authorization to respond as you see fit
to anything that happens. I mean, how do
you actually make
any argument that may how do you make
sense of this? How do you argue this
is what is in line with American values?
What? By declaring that Democrats are so bad,
this isn't what we have to do? You're
lost.
You're being played.
Even if that's the truth, by the way,
you're still being played.
Now he says, therefore, I am directing sick
the the Kristi Noem and Tom Homan to
instruct all ICE, Homeland Security, and other law
enforcement. Oh, okay. So now it just spins
out to literally anywhere and everything. No matter
what the context, whether it's Homeland Security, ICE,
police officers, or your local sheriff, now apparently
they can do whatever they want. If they
decide that you're acting a certain way.
This is insane. It's and and it's mind
blowing that people aren't calling this out more.
He says, who is on the receiving end
of thrown rocks, bricks, or any other form
of assault.
That's already a crime. You don't need to
embellish this and make it worse. You're just
trying to punish certain acts that you view
through a certain political lens. That's all this
is. They throw a rock, then arrest them
for it. To make it something bigger is
politically motivated. And it's just to stop their
cars and arrest these slime balls
who are stopping you from what they believe
is wrong, or what you're doing in many
cases, which is shockingly illegal. But it says
using whatever means necessary to do so. That's
an insane thing to say about American citizens
who are simply protesting. Whether they're doing it
in ways you think are wrong or not,
I am giving total authorization for ICE to
protect itself just like they protect the public.
Now if this was a MAGA protest and
they were throwing rocks at Democrats trying to
protect a
transgender clinic, would
you think that would be allowed? Do you
think they would go after them with violence,
or do you think suddenly they would say,
well,
it's always the same thing, guys. Your partisan
your mindset blinds you to facts.
But this,
even if everything you think here is okay,
will continue well beyond this and be used
against you. Mark my
words.
Kristi Noem says, our ICE officers risk their
lives every day to protect Americans. Hardly.
I mean, look. There's plenty of examples where
you could argue that what they did could
stop somebody from committing crimes. But to argue
that ICE officers risk their lives to protect
Americans is, I mean, I would dispute that
with the FBI and plenty of others based
on their
majority track record. But, certainly, people will disagree.
They have our backs. Thank you, president.
The same thing. I was on my way
back from Texas, and I watched in disbelief
as thugs were vile. I've got the clip
here. They're basically throwing rocks at the car.
I mean, that's you know, this this is
what he's talking about. This is happening at
They're trying to drive away.
People are trying to stop them.
Yeah.
They throw some rocks as they try to
drive away.
Yeah. That's it. That's it. It's an insurrection
according to Steve Miller.
Insurrection, he calls it. Waving foreign flags. Insurrection.
My god. These people Stephen Miller is working
for Israel. He's a Zionist.
It's not even sacred. It's actually outspoken from
Besant and and
and Miller
and and Huckabee.
Guys,
he's watching people stand there and protest. Fine.
If you if that one guy who threw
a rock, then arrest him. To try to
make this invalidated is what they're they're destroying
this country's values,
and you're screaming it on like a bunch
of children
for those that are.
Now, of course, David as David Icke said,
and we'll come back to the Epstein point.
He goes, I see Alex is back on
script. Didn't take long. Colts are like that.
Epstein? Who's he?
As the eleventh democrat leaders defend violent attacks
on ICE agents who just saved 11 children
from being used as slave labor at a
pot farm. My god. I mean, it's just
it guys, to make that story if you're
gonna be honest about this, then say that
it was illegal immigration on a farm. You
know why they don't say that? Because they're
gonna go, didn't Trump just say farms which
are that they're in that certain farms are
getting passes?
Because this is dishonest coverage. That's why.
I can be honest about illegal immigrants and
the conversation about one like, but this people
like this are trying to play you.
He calls it domestic terror
and real insurrection.
Now look, everyone, oh, he's just trolling the
left. Well, it doesn't matter what you think
he's doing. The fact is he's stating that's
a real insurrection after you guys just spent
years screaming
about how wrong it is to call January
6 an insurrection.
It's just lazy how obvious this is. But
he's playing you, like a lot of them
are, whether they know it or not, into
the direction that is against this country's interest.
I mean, it's it's on the surface right
now.
Of course, this is one of the other
things. Here's what the White House put out.
This is not a joke. That's the White
House account.
ICE raised marijuana farms filled with illegal aliens.
Okay. So the point is raided a farm
that has illegal aliens. Not and that was
not filled with they with there is illegal
aliens that they arrested, which is no different
than every other location they're doing
it
in. Or also no different than the farms
Trump is allowing to not have that happen
to.
Obviously, a valid point. And then he goes
crying, Jimmy, they're just strawberry pickers, which is
what they were.
The same places that Trump is stopping.
Never realize you could strawberry pickers I mean,
you could say pick
cannabis pickers.
Okay. If you're focused on the cannabis part,
you're you're very easy to manipulate. It is
a legal farm in California.
Legal.
The point is they're
agriculture workers. And the point is they ain't
produce homes.
That's product.
That's the White House
account. You see, my point though is they're
focused on the cannabis thing because these people
are so lost in their own political mindset.
It is not against the law most places
in this country.
But they make an AI picture of a
person in congress
to make fun of him. We are guys,
we are not a serious country right now.
The people in power are embarrassing.
No different than clumsy Biden who can't think
straight. We're being used right now, but then
it can't I can't stop noticing it. Aaron
Melnick says, so the White House is posting
fake AI images of members of congress.
FYI,
legal grow operation, which it was. You can
look it up for yourself. A licensed facility
run by a legitimate company producing legal
product.
Whether that company comply with labor or immigration
laws, different question. Exactly. And Aaron Melnick has
been honest about these things the entire time.
He's not afraid to point out that these
there are legal aliens that have been arrested.
The point is that for them to make
this story is not about the illegal immigrants
or any of it. They're trying to make
this a distraction
from everything they're from the trafficking conversation, from
the fact that Trump just allowed aliens to
exist in certain farms.
It just pains me how dumb all this
is.
And then you get Zionist Miller jumping out
and going insurrection,
waving foreign flags. Like, there's at no point
is that ever been a crime.
He's just trying to use what they can
in front of you. If you look at
the flags, it's a Palestinian flag, Mexican flag.
Why? Because there are people who are Hispanics
being arrested because people
arrested.
Because people are protesting for Palestine. It's insane.
As Max Blumenthal says, Steven, can you clarify
whether you collaborated with Israeli intelligence in your
crackdown on Palestine Palestine solidarity activist, The United
States?
And can you explain why your political priority
seems so overtly influenced by your ethno religious
loyalty to a foreign apartheid state?
Please. Thank you.
Here's the here's the Times visual article,
Times of Israel. Trump team used Canary Mission
site
to target anti Israel activists for deportation,
of which Stephen Miller is connected to, is
a part.
I'm hoping people can start to see this,
guys. My god. Are we lost right now?
I mean, just as a country, when it
comes to the the direction and the overtaking
I mean, I shouldn't even say it like
that.
Seeing as how I'm in the mind right
now that we've never been more aware of
that.
It is a positive turn, and it's a
very good thing that's happening that people are
finally starting to see what's actually controlling the
outcome.
Now a health overlap, also very connected to
this point, after which we will come back
to the Epstein conversation and the two party
illusion.
But in case you missed these as well,
Derek Rose reported this yesterday. So the Trump
administration's EPA
releases a new guideline on a guide on
geoengineering,
contrails, chemtrails, only to tell the public
nothing to see here.
Trump two point o is basically a limited
hangout investigation of various conspiracies. Now I haven't
got into it yet. I plan to look
further, but the, Nicole Shanahan, I believe, is
her name, the RFK's old VP, apparently put
out some whole report about the truth of
geoengineering and all this stuff, but I'm very
suspicious about this kind of binary playing of
it all. I we already know the information
other than let's I mean, I'm gonna go
through it. Maybe there's new things she pointed
out that are relevant. Like, I always will
regardless of whether I'm suspicious
as we all should. But
here is the report.
Information on contrails from aircraft.
This is a
go back to sleep document.
So for all those that thought they were
gonna change everything and expose the reality, they're
lying to you yet again. That is directly
from the Trump EPA.
Same point, also EPA. And Derek's gonna do
an article for this tea lab coming up
soon. As I've been reporting, he says, was
likely to happen. Remember all the screaming about
Trump and and and RFK and fighting back
the fluoride? Well, Trump's EPA has decided to
continue
the Biden EPA's appeal
of the historic federal court ruling, which ordered
the EPA to act on the dangers
posed by water fluoridation.
This is Michael Conant
from the Florida Action Network.
He's the one that Derek's been reporting. He's
interviewed him more than once. He's fighting this
case. He's saying after several extensions, the Trump
administration has decided to appeal
the court decision.
Stand up, everybody.
Scream about this. There I mean, r k
junior even did a whole tap dance about
fluoride. Now is he genuine and Trump's not
letting him do it? Is it irrelevant at
this point?
Call it out. Because what's crazy about this
for me is that people right now, the
the usual suspects are doing everything they can
to make, for example, Epstein only about Pam
Bondi and somehow just magically forgetting that Trump
was involved with all of it or that
he's the one that put her there or
that he's the one dictating what she does
because she's a blind, or following
appointee like the rest of them. But it
was only Bondi. She did it all. That's
we're gonna get to. But my god, guys.
Unreal.
But I guarantee you this gets barely any
coverage by all the fake maha out there,
but you're the ones that are real. Call
it out.
Here's the ongoing coverage from,
Derek about this. Here's and here's the last
one I just put out, by the way.
We'll have to cover this soon. I'll include
this for you.
Is Trump's EPA planning to continue the appeal?
The answer now is yes.
You know how much pushback we got from
this?
Didn't you just hear RFK? He told you
what was gonna happen. Yep. They're they and
those are the same ones now trying to
tell you why this is a good thing.
The same person. That's how confounding this is
because either they're so lost or they were
never honest about it.
On top of that, another EPA example coming
also from Donald Trump's administration.
Despite
two plus years
passing since the Norfolk Southern train derailment in
East Palestine,
the EPA and Norfolk Southern
continue to insist
now in what they call the final phase
of the waterway cleanup
that there is no
ongoing human health threat from the disaster.
Can you believe that?
Let's go see if this pops up. Here
it is. Look at that.
Not only all the coverage from us, which
I've included a couple important articles in this.
The one talking about the
how the dioxin contamination that was found in
the filters in the homes of people was
up to 14000%
more than compared to controls.
Very proven, peer reviewed science, or the fact
that Norfolk Southern lied, which they did.
I I was one of the few that
even covered this. Investigation
found that the controlled burn was unnecessary
and that they misled the the the the
volunteer fire chief. It was treated vinyl chloride.
He knew that. He misheld it. They lied.
And nothing ever happened to these people despite
all this being public, despite T Lab standing
on a mountain top and screaming about this
every day. Doesn't change. Because we need the
tuckers to break the story. We need them
to carry the and that's what I tend
to see as that barrier. That's why I
don't believe it's honest.
Alright? Question it. Just recognize that this is
known. And now the Trump EPA EPA is
letting it go.
No accountability
here, which is insane.
Even this story got very I mean, look
at the case. It's just it seems very
clear to me
that there's so obviously, something going on with
certain things in certain context.
And this was the point to show you
that even e even the Guardian
from the 06/19/2024,
chemicals from East Palestine derailment spread to 16
different states. But, yeah, let's pretend like there's
no real ongoing issue despite re pre, recent
follow ups showing people with the same problems,
still getting migraine through home, vomiting blood, all
sorts of terrible things. We just talked about
this. But guess that doesn't matter because Trump's
EPA says,
just like Biden's EPA
says.
Toby Rogers points out an a very important
point. Here's the link to it right here
from New York Times. How health care remade
The US economy.
Here's what he says. Woah. This is nuts.
The US used to make things.
Now The US just makes people sick and
profits from them. We really need to absorb
this. Top employer in each state in 1990,
the majority was manufacturing.
Look at this now. Top employer in each
state in 2024.
What's up? 90% health care?
They see what's going on. They've driven us
here. They recognize a profit motive, a control
mechanism.
That's my opinion anyway. I mean, explain this
to me. It's it's if clearly, that's not
what everybody wants the focus to be.
Alex Rosen, if you didn't see this one
already, FDA just granted full approval
for Moderna's mRNA COVID shot for age six
months to 11 years old. We covered
it. It is real.
Alex Rosen says, guys, relax.
Have faith.
Trump administration is just approving heart attacks for
infants to expose how bad heart attacks are,
which, by the way, might as well be
the exact logic we're seeing in every one
of these conversations.
But no one wants to talk about this
one, do they?
It's because it's impossible to sidestep.
Another COVID nineteen shot. What was that again
about
gold standard science? What was that again about
mRNA shots and you're being aware of the
of the risk? My god.
I mean, this is why this stuff's breaking
down, guys.
As as five times August points out, this
is Moderna COVID shot for kids cleared in
face of RFK criticism. Yeah. Which maybe is
the case, but as he says, us in
January, pull the COVID shot. Us in February,
pull the COVID shot. March, pull the COVID
shot. April, pull the COVID shot. May, June,
pull the COVID shot. Them in July, here's
a new COVID shot for kids.
It takes a special this is why only
the Kirks and Johnsons and Joneses are out
there still pushing these lines because you take
you're either a blind follower or you're calling
it up at this point.
And a great thread by,
Josh Wilkos,
they told us in gain of function was
banned. Now we covered this too. Right? Actually,
I think I can grab that article.
There it is. The gain of function head
fake. Alright? We covered this the day this
came out. You know why? Because you could
have read the document for yourself instead of
listening to what Jones told you, and the
document showed you they were lying to you,
that they were not stopping gain of function.
They were becoming the leaders in the safe,
quote, safe version of gain of function in
the world. Or rather, they said the less
dangerous or whatever the term was. So in
fact, they were becoming the leader of gain
of function, just we're gonna stop the ones
we argue were the bad ones.
They lied to you guys. You got played.
And as Josh Walcos covers, however, a new
peer reviewed, study
funded by the US government shows scientists engineering
novel flu viruses with enhanced ability to infect
humans. Literally the definition of gain of function
in one form. They say it's for surveillance,
but I'll show you it's just semantic subterfuge.
The point is, surveillance or not, that's the
whole thing. That's the same thing they did
before. They studied in the lab to find
out, which is actually ridiculously illogical. There's no
way that makes sense to me. But
it's it's a bio weapon discussion, guys. It's
it's the
dual use is the real way to frame
it. It could be bio. It could be
whatever you wanna claim the positive side is.
So this study is showing yet again that
they're doing gain of function. And in fact,
the in fact, the exact same way that
they were doing before. So they didn't even
stop the dangerous versions. They just kept doing
it. Yet again, being played.
Now, it's important to be able to stand
up and call this out. Admit it. We've
all been played at some point, guys. That's
the important thing is to go, okay. I
see it now. I made a mistake. I'm
gonna call it out. I've been there. We've
all been there.
Now on the Pfizer aspect of this,
which I think is really important to point
out, this has been circulating. I just wanna
make sure you saw that it was, in
fact, a real story. This headline is, going
around recently. It really stems back as far
as I can tell to a,
Miami Herald article. But here's the headline circulating.
US Department of Justice reportedly dropped an investigation
into Pfizer after Pam Bondi assumed office as
attorney general. Why? Because she has connections with
Pfizer.
Here's the Miami Herald article. Bondi made changes
to the DOJ policy. Her former client, Pfizer,
might have benefited.
It is in I mean, it's just it's
actually incredible to me how much this connects.
It's almost like they tried to show you.
They just didn't wanna see it. In for
pa for the past several years, pharmaceutical giant
Pfizer has been under investigation
by The US hit think about this. Now,
again, I don't think there's any difference between
the it's just your US government and the
people they use to manipulate you. But if
you wanna see it differently, explain to me
why the Biden administration was investigating Pfizer, and
now Trump drops that. Of course, you could
argue that it was never real, and they
just did it to make you think that.
Okay. I question that. The same white question
whether Trump's doing anything just to get you
to think a certain thing as opposed to
actually caring about it. The point is they're
investigating Pfizer, and then Bondi who worked for
them comes on board, and they drop the
investigation.
Simple as that. They were investigating for potential
foreign corruption violations related to its activities in
China and Mexico.
But went ahead and let you use their
dangerous products, though, because that's okay.
Says, but that appears to have changed after
the Trump administration tapped Pam Bondi
to lead the justice department.
Simple, guys.
She come on board, they stop. And And
now they're working with Pfizer to give you
more dangerous shots. Now here's the point about
the bioconvergence I thought was interesting.
This is a clip from the FDA Direct
episode 11. This was
July 11, yesterday.
Just a couple points about the direction of
this, the convergence of these new technologies, which
is what they keep telling you. Wearables and
all of that. Then Tucker Carlson's new,
investor or whatever levels is all about wearables.
Like, it's it's very clear where this is
going.
Here's the
clip
or
part
of
it
anyway.
Going to be and not where it is.
Because in in this job, where we're regulating
medical products that are on the cutting edge
of technology,
that are convergent, you know, between different types
of tech,
digital devices,
you know, regular medical or more conventional medical
devices,
drugs, data, etcetera. Right. You you have to
keep pace.
Very well said. Yeah.
Yeah. So and that's whether we want it
or not. Right? So they're telling you we
just have to keep pace with the technological
event. What if they're dangerous? What if we
don't want that? Nah. It doesn't matter. We
have to keep pace because China or whatever.
Yeah. That's yeah. Whatever the logic is, that
was it's not what we're not deciding these
things. Well, do Americans want these things? Do
we want you to drive us in direction
of the biodiesel convergence? Probably not.
So that's really the spirit of what we're
trying to do, and that's not to minimize
anyone's level of discomfort with how fast it's
happening.
We really Yeah. We we hear it, but
we don't care. Like, got it. Thank you.
Are hoping that, and and we've talked before
about ways that we're looking to engage frontline
review staff,
managers,
more senior leaders. You know, all the people
that are desperately concerned about this direction and
most of them not taking the COVID shots
anymore.
You know, it just it just we I
love it when they we don't wanna minimize
those feelings. Well, so the way you frame
that makes it clear that you you don't
don't wanna minimize. You're gonna talk about it
all day, but have they played any factor
on what you're doing? No. Clearly not. Because
we don't want it. You're doing it anyway.
So just we we don't wanna minimize it,
though. We'll talk about it all day, but
then we'll ignore it just the same.
That's who these people are.
Now I'm not saying inherently dishonest or evil.
Maybe I mean, that's that that's that point
always applies.
I'm never suggesting that we know these people
know what they're doing is wrong, or maybe
I'm wrong about it. Maybe what they're doing
is right and I'm missing something. The simple
reality though is my perspective is clearly this
is where it's going, and they're part of
that whether they know it or not. It's
just very important never to assume about people's
intentions. You just don't know.
So that that's say with talk or anybody
else. For all we know, this he could
turn out tomorrow to be the best ally
we ever had because he finally saw through
it. But it still makes you wonder and
question about all the lies of before, all
the time his punches were pulled, all the
times, you know, he could have seen those
things before or or hurt anybody.
But consider it all.
So
here
is an article we talked about this before.
Bio digital convergence.
Also, the title was COVID magnoferr
magnetogenet,
magnetogenetic
ferret and vaccines,
big spikes in mass vaccination areas. The point,
though, is about these main documents. This one
we discussed in that article from 02/2002,
which in this very article
and this this is the one promoted by
all, you know, the WEF and and all
the stuff we talked about throughout COVID. This
predicted
that in ten year or is it twenty
years, they would alter
that well, the direction of the human species
with technology.
And that was twenty years ago, which puts
us in 2022, which is, you know, right
in the middle of when this is all
happening. Then this this is the same thing
we saw
when Klaus Schwab came out. Again, looking back
at all that, it's almost like they chose
the person who was meant to look like
a Bond villain so that we would reflexively
push back on it than to accept Trump's
version of it, which was sold a different
way. But biodigital convergence, that's what this is.
That's what they're pushing. That's what we're gonna
get to in a second, the overlap of
where this goes. But remember, this is what
Klaus Schwab told you, not only that's coming,
but what we were living through.
What's the first industrial evolution will lead to
is a fusion
of our physical,
our digital,
and
our biological
identities.
It's the difference of this forced,
industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you
are doing. It changes you if you take
a genetic editing. Right. Just as an example,
it's you who are changed. Yeah. And, of
course, this has a big impact on your
identity. Yeah. It is important
to use the COVID nineteen crisis
as a timely
opportunity.
So people assume,
we are just going back,
to the good old world which we had,
and everything will be normal again
in
how we are used to normal in the
old
fashion. This is,
let's say, fiction.
It will not happen.
See
see,
cut, which we have now,
is much too strong,
in order not to leave traces.
Pretty obvious. Now here is the Canadian
document. This one came out. It's all part
of the same conversation. This came out in
2020, exploring biodigital convergence. Just to quickly read
the opening forward part of it. In the
coming years,
biodigital technologies
could be woven into our lives in the
way that digital technologies are now.
Biological and digital systems are converging and could
change the way we work, live, and even
evolve as a species.
That's how they see this, guys, and they
were putting this out. They got hard pushback,
and I think they put it in it's
still going on. They're just framing it a
different way.
So here is the World Economic Forum speaking
or what's I figured her name off top
of my head. It's,
right right here. Nita Ferra,
Ferra how do you say that? Ferrani,
who we've well, I'll show you some clips
from her from before. But here's a clip
just telling you where this is going, and
I think this is a larger part of
it. Now we're gonna talk about the drone
overlap to this, but realize what we're talking
about is not just the
this overlap for me, the focal point is
about surveillance.
So think about it in that vein. Right?
But it's about all encompassing total information awareness,
you know, the Palantir direction and how this
is being used in ways that go beyond
cameras and listening devices. Right? Internal
biosurveillance.
We talked about this for a long time.
Oh, I don't think I I just I'd
I'm gonna play the lock longer clips. I
didn't download this one. The simple she basically
saying things here. Let me just grab it
anyway since we're here. Let's just do it
anyway.
Do it live.
So I'm gonna show you three clips then
since we're grabbing this one. And the the
clips
are about her talking about where this is
going. Not in some distant twenty, thirty years
from now, but the but the
but the current reality of where we're working
toward, like, as we speak.
And this is what she recently said.
And then we're gonna play two more, I
believe, after that.
Here we go.
Devices.
So these are brain sensors,
that are starting to be embedded in everyday
devices, but until now
have been a number of niche companies that
really have focused on mindfulness and meditation. The
use of, for example, brain centers that can
pick up electrical activity in the brain at
a pretty low resolution, but advances in
AI have both improved what the signal is
that can come from the brain
and enabled the miniaturization
of those products.
As a lot of the major tech companies
start to invest
in these brain sensors, it's a huge, I
think, untapped market in many ways of integrating
them into everyday devices. These are earbuds
or watches
or headphones and the soft cups around the
ears. Many of those products are hitting the
market this year, and others are hitting them
within the next two years such that people
can listen to music, a phone call, etcetera,
while having those devices in ears.
Initially,
what they will be capable of doing is
very high level brain state reading.
Things like, are you tired? Are you paying
attention? Is your mind wandering? Are you happy
or sad?
They maybe enable interaction like up, down, left,
right for interaction with other technologies,
and they're being embedded into things like,
visual,
virtual reality headset.
You know? And so to some people, that
sounds fun,
exciting. You know? They get to play their
video games with more, you know, but but
it's it's like the Neuralink overlap. You know?
There's clearly benefits or some just, you know,
whether it's
benefits, you know, in whatever whatever facet, whatever
style.
But it's rarely what it's actually about. It's
about in invasive control. I mean, look at
anything we've ever used, whether it's cell phones
or anything. It's always you look back, it
was always used
under under some flimsy guys of your best
interest or safety,
you know, but ultimately used to spy on
you, to control your life. I mean, that's
how this always, always goes. And so here
are some clips that we played before. So
thinking about what she's talking about. And this
is even framed in a way that's, like,
the least alarming version of this. And so
what well, actually, we'll start with the port
the the the one in the ear To
show you the technology level is it's not
some flying car future conversation. It's about, you
know, I talk about that joke I make
about the boys' life magazine. You know? Oh
my god. Flying cars. And then, oh, that's,
like, a hundred years from now. Point is
they're talking about these things, but it's now
we're talking about. And here's an example of
what she just mentioned about the earbud.
The newest way to monitor attention
is through a device like this one.
These are ear pods that are launching later
this year.
These ear pods, much like the video you
watched earlier,
are ear pods that can pick up brainwave
activity and tell whether or not a person
is paying attention
or their mind is wandering.
Okay. Well, you might think,
fine. But even if we can tell whether
a person is paying attention or their mind
is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying
attention
to. You would be wrong.
Turns out that you can not only tell
whether whether a person is paying attention
or their mind is wandering, but you can
discriminate between the kinds of things that they're
paying attention to.
Whether they're doing something like central tasks, like
programming,
peripheral tasks, like writing documentation,
or unrelated tasks, like surfing social media or
online browsing.
When you combine brainwave activity together with other
forms of software
and surveillance technology Surveillance. The power becomes quite
precise.
So what do we do with this?
What do we do with technology that enables
us to monitor brainwave activity for attention?
Do we embrace it? Do we resist it?
I believe that there is a pathway forward
with such technology,
but it's putting it in the hands of
employees,
enabling them to use it for themselves
as a choice,
whether or not they want to focus,
whether or not they want the technology in
order to improve their own performance, but not
using it
as a measure of their brain metrics to
decide whether to fire
them, hire them, or to watch for their
lagging cognitive decline over time
and using it as a way to discriminate
against them.
So, obviously, you could argue
that, you know, give it to them to
use, and they could decide I mean, it's,
you know, it's a nice way to frame
that. Highly doubt that's the way it's gonna
work, especially since, you know, in this is
a great article Derek put out called Doge.
Is efficiency a gateway to technocracy?
And this image is one I made basically
putting Elon's face on the the
the man, his name was Taylor. He started
what was called Taylorism. And that was kind
of an early part of of the efficiency
movement, which was an early part of the
technocracy movement. And the point is it was
all about trying to, you know in a
way, it very rapidly became sort of a
eugenics kind of overlap to the whole thing
about trying to maximize the best in everything,
traits and genes and, you know, actions and
workplace. And it's it's it's where they're driving
all of this. The point though is what
she's discussing is, you know, they don't if
they give you these tools, it's not it's
about how these things apply to a workforce.
It's how they've all been making this out
to be. And I'm gonna play the next
one that will make that even more clear.
But so here's the actual iPad
patent. Well, this is an article about it,
but it the patent I've brought up many
times.
It's got the number of the patent in
here. I just thought this was more illustrative.
Let me see if I can grab real
quick. I brought this up many times. Oops.
Let's see.
It looks like that's the oh, here. Here's
just another article about it. I've looked this
up many times. Apple's AirPods, terrifying new security
features, scan the inside of your skull with
AI. Good lord. It's a terrifying way to
frame that. February
2022.
We've brought this up many times. I'm just
doing a reference point.
There it is.
Here's the actual patent or one of the
listings of it anyway.
Or not. How frustrating.
Now I feel like I have to find
it. Hold on.
AirPods.
Damn. All these things. Here we go. Finally.
Doesn't it bother you how people put these
out and they don't include that link? It
drives me crazy.
Every corporate platform does that these days where
they don't actually include,
like, the link to the bill they're discussing
and so on. Let that load.
But so the point is this patent is
an Apple patent, which has existed for a
while, where it can use the the earbud
to interact with your brainwaves. That's the simplest
way to put it. The argument is, well,
because they wanna know if you're too loud
or you're engaging with the music, you know,
whatever. My point's my point is always, it's
for you, of course, even though it's not.
So the point, oh, you're gonna play this
clip while that loads, is this goes well
beyond
even earbuds. This goes beyond this goes into
things we've talked about in regard to,
you know, just more social engineering dynamics. And
this one is terrifying to me. First off,
a video.
It's gonna make you see the future and
understand a wonderful future where we can use
brainwaves to fight crime, be more productive, and
find love. Let's roll.
You're in the zone.
Even you can't believe how productive you've been.
Your memo is finished. Your inbox is under
control, and you're feeling sharper than you have
in a decade.
Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your
favorite song,
sending chills up your spine as the music
begins to play.
You glance at the program running in the
background on your computer screen
and notice a now familiar sight that appears
whenever you're overloaded with pleasure,
Your theta brainwave activity decreasing
in the temporal regions of your brain.
You mentally move the cursor to the left
and scroll through your brain data over the
past few hours.
You can see your stress levels rising
as the deadline to finish your memo approached
causing a peak in your beta brainwave activity
right before an alert popped up telling you
to take a brain break.
But what's that unusual change in your brain
activity when you're asleep?
It started earlier in the month.
You send a text message to your doctor
with a mental swipe of your cursor.
Could you take a quick look at my
brain data?
Anything to worry about?
Your mind starts to wander to the new
colleague on your team whom you know you
shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against
intra office romance.
But you can't help fantasizing just a little.
But then you start to worry that your
boss will notice your amorous feelings
when she checks your brain activity and shift
your attention back to the present.
You breathe a sigh of relief when an
email she sends you later that day
congratulates you on your brain metrics from the
past quarter, which have earned you another performance
bonus.
You head home jamming to the music with
your work issued brain sensing earbuds still in.
When you arrive at work the next day,
a somber cloud has fallen over the office.
Along with emails,
text messages, and GPS location data,
the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from
the past year.
They have compelling evidence that one of your
coworkers
has committed massive wire fraud.
Now they're looking for his coconspirators.
You discover they are looking for synchronized
brain activity
between your coworker and the people he has
been working with.
While you know you're innocent of any crime,
you've been secretly working with him on a
new startup venture.
Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
What do you think? Is it a future
you're ready for?
You may be surprised to learn that it's
a future that has already arrived.
Everything in that video that you just saw
is based on technology that is already here
today.
Artificial intelligence has enabled
advances
in decoding brain activity in ways that we
never before thought possible.
It's very clear.
Right? I mean, it's it's undeniable
what they're telling you anyway. Right? No question
all this,
but realize that what they're and this is
my point about the Wi Fi. You know,
that we're well beyond these points and we
don't even understand. You know, that they're
we're fixated on an old style, I think,
a lot of people. And the reality is
that these things have been coming for quite
a long time. And we're at a point
now where this is slowly being put out.
So we need to recognize like, don't miss
the forest for the trees of where this
goes because right here,
this next one,
is where I believe this is really culminating
to. And this is Greg Reese did a
great clip of video on this in regard
to AI kill and control system by Palantir.
We've been talking a lot about this, but
where it connects, where it goes. Now this
overlaps with literally everything, whether it's immigration, whether
it's surveillance, whether it's,
you know, the kind of great build back
better kind of control structure, whether it
is working for a four I mean, there's
everything we've talked about, everything, including
going after Americans, which is something they keep
floating. But so consider this and how it's
all building out with what we know, which
overlaps undeniably with Israel.
In 02/2024,
Palantir made a deal with Israel to harness
Palantir's
advanced technology
in support of war related missions.
We see part of that technology today as
the Lavender AI system, which assigns Palestinians
a numerical score of one to a 100
based on how likely they are of being
an enemy.
It has a 10% error rate, which has
been acceptable for Israel and Palantir.
Forget it. Wealthy off of killing Palestinians.
Palantir kills Palestinians
with their AI and technology. Oh. They're killing
my family in
Oh.
And, you know How
do you sleep at night? Well, if you
I'm on you. Do you wanna hear my
answer? So the primary source of of death
in Palestine
is the fact that Hamas has realized that
there are millions and millions of useful idiots
that will Using that excuse. This is why
you don't care flat. Carry your AI and
your technology from Palantir to kill
Palestinian.
Mostly
terrorists. So what do you think about the
use of artificial
intelligence or lavender
by the IDF in
identifying
Hamas targets?
Look, I yeah. I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without
without,
going into all the deep you know, I
I'm not on top of all the details
of what's going on in Israel because my
my bias is to defer to Israel. It's
it's it's not for us
to to second guess every, everything.
And, I I believe that,
broadly, the IDF gets to decide, what it
wants to do and that they're broadly in
the right. And along with the Lavender system,
there is the Habsora
AI system,
which means the gospel, which is an AI
tool created to address the human issue of
running out of targets.
Hubsura generates up to 100 targets per day.
Both these AI systems use Palantir's
advanced surveillance technology
to track every person's phone records,
social media, and movement patterns.
Don't forget that they also have that and
now have access to every piece of data
that the US government has on you
and are using that collectively. Like, we've I
mean, Alex Clark will tell you what he
wants to do to people he thinks are
his enemies, whether American citizens or not.
Palantir's tech is used by the US military
and local police departments.
It is the premier tool for mass surveillance.
When running for his first term, Trump was
saying he would implement a biometric tracking system.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately. We will ensure that this system is
in place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system. They told you.
He told you.
Palantir cofounder
Peter Thiel donated $1,250,000
to that campaign,
and he donated 15,000,000
to JD Vance's 2022
Ohio senate campaign.
Palantir has significant ties to the CIA
starting in 2004
when the CIA's venture capital arm In Q
Tel gave Palantir $2,000,000.
Palantir's
Gotham platform was developed by and for the
CIA.
Initially,
the CIA
was Palantir's
sole customer for several years.
Palantir
is the CIA's
surveillance tool, and now Palantir is to create
a system for the federal government that will
monitor every American under an AI system, linking
Social Security, the IRS, and immigration
into one centralized
system.
It will be using its Gotham software
developed by the CIA
Sure sounds like social credit to me. To
track and condition human behavior.
Most of
yesterday's alternative media
support this.
For those who can still think clearly,
this is as dystopian as it gets, but
there are many fools who are content that
the fascist society
being put into place will not be woke,
but don't be surprised if it comes with
a carbon tax and an American version of
a social credit system.
Greg Rees reporting.
Yeah. He sure sees it. Exactly. At least
it's not woke. Right? Yeah. The he called
out those pronouns, so we're all good. How
long have I been saying that? Greg Reese
definitely sees it. Now here, I I was
able to find this, by the way, which
it was it's it's so crazy to me
how these things that, by the way, like,
I don't even wanna go into it. But
just trying to search for the exact I
even search for the exact number and you
it's just weird how how the
with, you know,
Google and all these different plot you know,
what we use to search for information. It's
like we let's not forget these things are
all completely weaponized against us. It's just interesting
to think about. But I was able to
track it down through another article, but here's
one of them. There's many. The biosignal sensing
device using dynamic selection of electrodes.
Wearing an electrical device includes a housing and
electrode carrier attached to the housing and having
a nonlinear surface. The wearable electronic device includes
a set of electrodes including electro you know,
it goes on to explain it. Here's the
actual breakdown.
Apple reportedly filed a patent for its AirPods
to few for to to feature electrodes that
detect brain electrical activity.
And, I mean, we've this we've gone over
this extensively, and it's much more deep than
that if you wanna read through it for
yourself.
Just to show you where and and we
you just saw how they're laying this out
and what they want this to mean. If
they can monitor your lecture your your brainwaves,
in many ways, they can read you.
And it gets much crazier than that. But
here, as you already know, is what we've
seen developing through the immigration point. Palantir's immigration
OS fuels their immigrant removal agenda, which is
now just spun out into just anything they
want it to be.
Tech billionaires led by, by,
Palmer
lucky to launch new bank to rival SVB
crypto bank. Now what's that? What's here is
the actual, update to the article.
For some reason, they always change their titles
these days. I don't know why. To launch
crypto focused bank.
Surprise, surprise.
So you have Palantir and, you know,
longs Lonsdale and, you know, all the characters
we're talking about. Lucky Palmer working together to
make a crypto focused bank, but, you know,
don't don't see that as exactly what we've
been telling you is coming forward.
Let's not forget that Thiel himself
multiple times met with
Epstein.
He worked,
invested with Epstein.
All this is covered. T Thiel is very
much connected to Epstein.
Now
to overlapping all of that with the direction
it's going through the White House with the
drone focus, which is the last part of
the segment. Right? Think about all that we
just discussed. And Palantir and Duro being the
suppliers, both tech and and hardware for the
drone dynamic in everywhere, Ukraine, all in every
place we're talking about, Israel.
And now and, of course, in this country,
and now we're talking about this new development
through Palantir for surveillance to control, and we
Greg Reese just laid it out for you
how it's being built. Now we've talked about
this with Zoe, by the way, Smith, in
regard to the way the drone direction goes,
where the technology they're using, and how it
can you know, it it is designed in
a way to be
enforcement,
not just outside this country. So now that
they're rolling this stuff out, ask yourself if
this is what it was all about. As
Patrick Henningson says, this is what happens when
you put a second rate Fox host with
no real qualifications
in charge of the Pentagon.
It rolls out this I mean, this is
the video they put out from,
directly from the secretary of defense account.
We know why we were put here.
We were brought here to rebuild the military.
Is that what happened? I know that some
of his core followers and base, who now
doubt that they're being honest with you, wanted
that. But is that what most Americans wanted?
I mean, the game is no matter what
they wanna do, they just go, we've got
a mandate. That means they wanted everything we
say. Not really what's happening. But most Americans
do not want more war, do not want
a bigger look around, guys. The history's been
there. But he'll tell you what you want
and the Jones and the Benny's will scream
it.
Match
capabilities
to the threats of today.
So while our adversaries have produced millions of
cheap drones,
before us, we were mired in bureaucratic
red tape.
Right. Biden wouldn't let you do it even
though that's not at all true. Not anymore.
In June, president Trump issued an executive order
unleashing
American
drone
dominance.
Is Is that a little drone waving a
white flag back there? Is that a signal
to Israel?
To bolster our drone industry
and arm our war fighters because that's what
we're all about. So today, I'm rescinding restrictive
policies
that stifle production,
and this will unleash American manufacture.
Great. So just like with the AI point,
we're gonna pretend like it's helping you, but
remove
what might hint, you know,
restrictions on how these companies can just can
take, you know, do whatever they want. Like
with the AI point, when they remove any
kind regulation for ten years even though that
hasn't technically happened yet, I believe that's where
it's gonna go regardless.
The idea that you that you you think
they weren't making drones before? You think the
US government wasn't rapidly doing that? They were.
So all this is all this is doing
is using, you hate Biden and Democrats, so
whatever I say next, you should nod an
agreement to.
Them rolling out a massive drone enforcement dynamic
in this country because Biden didn't let me.
Is that what you want?
Don't be that silly. Don't be that easy
to manipulate. And the ingenuity
of our war fighters by doing
three key things.
First,
we're gonna bolster The US drone manufacturing base
by producing thousands of American made products,
prioritizing
by American.
We'll arm combat you You buy American like
the Trump phone that you claim was gonna
be made in America and turn out to
be in China? Or that kind of made
in America? Or secretly wink wink in Israel
like the phone that Eric p
jeez. Blackwater. Eric Prince came out with? I
mean, they they they like to you like
a like breathing at this point. I mean,
the overarching point is they're trying to sell
you on your own enslavement. Is that way
I would look at it? The well, okay.
How about this? How about this? Then, Democrat
wins next time, and they use that drone
army to against you. You know? It's like
the point is just like the wall or
anything else, you have to look at it
from both angles.
These people are building out the future of
enforcement. And if whether it's in home and
abroad,
I don't think we I mean, maybe maybe
regardless of the intention, do you think that's
where it's all going and we should go
along with it? I I just don't agree
with that. I don't think this is what
we want. The dehumanization,
the the, you know, putting out things that
can act through AI that don't have any
accountability
for enforcing.
It's already happening in this country in many
ways. Units with a variety of low cost
American crafted drones,
leveraging our world leading engineers and AI experts.
How much you wanna bet that that won't
just be American made, that Israel will be
involved with some part of the creation of
these things? You know, probably the part that
allowed them to be build a backdoor or
spy through it or watch you. I mean,
I'm I'm kinda being facetious, but you know
as well as I, our history shows that
is always the case, especially with the most
blindly pro Zionist Israel administration in history. And
third,
we're gonna train
as we expect to fight.
Senior officers
Well, I'll grab this because it's the memo.
Senior officers must overcome bureaucratic risk aversion in
budgeting,
weaponing,
weaponeering, and training. So here's the memo we're
signing today. I didn't think of it's just
funny that's like this was recorded. Couldn't they
have like done it not with a mistake?
I just find that funny.
Delivered
via drones
here on the front lawn of the Pentagon
with some of our great war fighters flying
them.
This is the future.
We're in the fight. We're in the fight.
We're great war fighters
using a joystick.
We're in the fight to win it. I'm
never gonna back down.
We're in a fight to win it? To
win what?
The world?
I mean, just think about the way that
they frame this stuff.
Why do we have to always be in
a perpetual state of war? Because that's what
they want. Because that is what this country
runs on, the blood of other nations. How
long have I said that it's in or
rather the government.
The US government runs on the blood of
other nations. Guys, look back through your own
history. And so we always have to be
about to we're always fighting for that control
when you know, show me how that's benefited
Americans. In any way, look around. It's focused
on you, not the narrative, not the the
jingoistic screaming about how we save the world,
the reality of it. The world knows, guys.
There's not a secret. The world knows what
this government represents.
Finally, Americans are starting to see it too.
And that's that that is the most American
thing you could possibly say. We're not fighting
for some other country to take over like
our country does all the time elsewhere. We're
fighting as Americans who recognize our government has
you know, it it's it is the most
quintessentially thing American in this country.
Should they act against their own ends, it
is our right to alter or abolish
it. That's the that's our right to alter
a government that's acting for another country, in
my opinion. Either way, the point is this
is not what we want. Look around.
They this is what the screamers want.
Now Orwell points this out, and she did
a good thread in this. Let's expound on
this topic because here's what Laura Bebo put
out showing you all look at all these
drones.
US secretary of defense announced a plan for
drone dominance.
Because meanwhile, every China every Chinese city has
drone shows.
The point making is, you know, the I
think arguably kind of the you know, you
regard whether it's been called that or not.
That's only gonna drive their their argument that
we need to do more and faster. The
point is I find it near impossible that
they're ever gonna be able to
do
circumvent or,
overtake the direction that China's already let out.
But it goes on to say but Orwell
goes on to say back in May, a
news report
that may have flown under everyone's radar. We'll
talk about the article in a second.
And this is in regard to
experimental drones developed to neutralize mass shooters.
Oh, but now it's about China. Or later,
we got COVID and and and vaccines or
you know, as always, whatever they want is
rationalized by whatever agenda they put forward.
The company,
Bricourt Solutions, has brought policing to a new
level.
High threat response system. Like, this is how
this is your their whole idea is it's
about domestic
enforcement, guys. That's where this is going.
Along with Bricourt, flock safety has also entered
the arena joined with flock cameras. These drones
are
developed only with the use of AI
as and which is all the same things
and concerns about how that could be manipulated,
especially from outside. As the news coverage continues,
these drones will be used in schools k
through 12 in public areas that could be
deployed out of the ceiling.
Here in Florida, another agency is more than
willing to help bring this to fruition.
In conclusion, when it was stated that we
would need more of than guns to revolt
and with the new draft proposal for more
drones, who do you suppose these drones that
the DOD are requesting are really for? The
point is you.
So here is what she shared. First, this
is the company.
One of them, Flock Safety. It says shaping
the future of safety together
to solve and eliminate crime.
So that's like a pre crime AI dynamic,
guys. That's what this is. You need and,
you know, do you really want a world
where drones are enforcing a law?
I just this is what we're always warning
about.
Safety is something we create together, but how?
Here, look at look what it shows. A
map of your block.
A public safety technological
ecosystem.
We provide safety solutions to law enforcement, neighbors,
you know, spying, surveillance,
technocratic control structure.
But the good one though, you know, with
the good elitist and the good oligarchs.
So here's the article. This is from 05/16/2025.
Drones developed to neutralize mass shooters. It says,
now the next generation is rising up. Got
it right here, actually. It says, we don't
require GPS. It uses its vision in order
to fly autonomously.
So, yeah, so are no one's controlling
it. Once the threat's detected, now it can
begin tracking, following
that individual, providing real time information to the
first responders or any security that the scene
so they know what they're up against. Okay.
Consider that we're in a world where they're
telling you that you're a terrorist because you
wave a certain flag.
So you don't think they would use that
to weaponize against you, spy on you, look
for something to use against you, to say
you jaywalked so you're out of the country,
which they're already trying to do? You already
know how this will be weaponized against you.
The inventors do not okay. Now take a
step back. What if it's the other side?
Right? You're unable to consider that going on.
What happens when the Democrats come into power
and suddenly they're following you around and they're
they're arresting you for saying the wrong pronouns
or, you know, it's just it's the same
damn thing, whether it's
pronouns or whether it's antisemitism.
You know, they're using these things to drive
in the same agenda. It says the inventors
do not want to reveal the trade secrets,
but explained that drones can also lock in
on a weapon and then strike the side
of it, dispensing an adhesive substance that essentially
jams the firearms inner workings.
Well, yeah. So maybe the bad guys, but
mobile may maybe Americans trying to fight against
an illegitimate government. Oh my god. We're not
supposed to talk like that because it's not
like these are
foundational concepts within our constitution, guys. The idea
is not that in any case, we I'm
never calling for violence. But if we're not
able to discuss the hypothetical situation where a
government goes rogue or gets taken over by
something else and people are forced to take
back their country,
that's what that's written for. Times that were
tough, harder. I'm in no way calling for
that or advocating for violence. The point is
to be it's like discussing things like the
holocaust they tell you're not allowed to discuss.
The point is you need to be able
to have these conversations.
In this case, my point is
this is a a a structure being built
out where you have drones that can disarm
anybody.
Okay. Maybe that's what you want. But I
just think the way this continues to build
was we know that the war on terror,
the war of terror, has always been aimed
at you if you simply look. It was
used
to circa,
to sir
what's the word I'm looking for?
You know, to regime change countries, to to
manipulate foreign power, but also mostly to work
against you. And so at this point, what
we're seeing, I think, is the building out
of a concern that you're always the next
enemy. They've told you that over the years.
Now it says, quote, it disrupts the bolt
carrier group of AR style rifles, semiautomatic pistols,
pump action, semiautomatic
shotguns, and those are 95% of the weapons
utilized in an active shooter situation or 95%
of the weapons that are used by the
average people. The concept is for the drone
system to be housed throughout the building without
with,
the device dropping down from the ceiling when
trouble is detected.
The inventors compare the prototype to a sprinkler
system that is able to just extinguish a
fire. Guys, this is like the technocracy of
our of our nightmares. You're talking about buildings
and air or just devices in the streets
that just deploy drones the moment that you
do something they don't like, the the moment
you start protesting about something they don't want
you to. All of this is happening.
This people will you even the statement I
made, you as well as you damn well
know for over the years how clearly we
are act advocating for the anything with violence,
We'll still be used to make it look
like we're somehow or anybody talking about this
is somehow part of the problem.
And look how flimsy this has gotten.
You you you write an article about how
Israel's committing genocide and now you're a terrorist.
According to the government,
It's coming, guys. And, yeah, simply having these
conversations
puts ourselves at risk,
but it's important.
It matters to call these things out.
Now we talked about this back in 01/02/2025.
Fifth generation warfare, drones, fog, false flags, and
political destabilization.
Remember the random car or cyber truck blowing
up outside the trunk? I mean, think of
how many of these little examples we've seen.
It's we're being driven in this direction.
Now
border patrol biometric expansion at US borders moves
ahead with new global entry plans.
Jan 07/10/2025.
Day by day by day, this is expanding
rapidly, and people are being lost in the
minutia of the day to day events. They're
not paying attention to the longer plan.
And, of course, the bigger picture
is what we've been telling you from the
very beginning. DD Geopolitics reports Israel has signed
an agreement with the US government
to cooperate in all things artificial intelligence.
Don't forget, they signed policy to consolidate
the
all of the data
on all Americans.
And now that data will be shared with
Israel.
Now look, we've been saying that because that's
my opinion. Now we've gone beyond that. Now
we have proof that Israel is collaborating
with the AI building structure in this country,
which means they have access to every single
thing about you.
Is that what you want from monsters like
Netanyahu
who use that information to get you fired,
to attack you, to blackmail you?
That's what we're dealing with. And your government
is allowing this complete infiltration, or really, you're
just seeing it. It's been there.
I said, this is what we've been warning
about
right in front of your eyes with barely
a passable narrative.
Now,
as I recently said,
it seems clear to me anyway that the
usual partisan lines
and the media government control over narratives have
completely collapsed.
So I think what we're seeing right now,
Elon's new party, Tucker, any any number of
other examples, is a rapid and seemingly desperate
reordering,
reorganizing
of the system. So I just wanna reset
that point. Just consider that. That I I
think that that's what we're watching right now.
So with that in mind, I think it's
important to see some of the things that
have been coming out from the partisan game.
Here's what the White House put out. Again,
it's just embarrassing. Now, again, it's it's really
no different than, I think it's right here.
The Biden example, you know, it's it's the
point is it's not left or right, guys.
It's your government is
embarrassing,
is controlled by something else that it's acting
against interest, I think, of Americans.
For the podcast, just showing the Biden's with
their the eyes red going just like we
drew it up. You know, that's that's what
they're doing. They're just,
it's embarrassing. Just put it simply. It really
is. Like, this kind of thing, this is
what the White House put out.
The symbol of hope, truth, justice, the American
way, Superman Trump.
Literally with Trump as a Superman.
Like, it just it I mean, it is,
in a general sense, truly embarrassing. These people
are this childish.
And I simply said, wow. Next level hero
worship and or ridiculous, shameless level of desperation
propaganda
who is cheering for or supporting this type
of kindergarten level campaign.
Hashtag dying empire.
Well, somebody responded saying this guy. Yeah. That's
that's cat turd wearing the daddy Trump t
shirt.
Just showing these these are the kind of
people that are lockstep
with whatever, even things that make them look
stupid because Trump.
Five times August, not being one of those
people simply said in the making the joke
of the White House post,
saying,
except this Superman gets really mad when you
bring up Lex Luther and wants you to
stop asking questions about it. We'll get to
that. Epstein and the way he's trying to
act like it's not a big deal. He
also says, we are not a serious country
and shows both the left and the right.
See, there's more than you think out there
of people who see this.
People who, you know, I'm sure,
he and I differ on certain things, but
he has the integrity enough to call out
anybody who is being hypocritical,
left or right, and is now seeing pretty
obviously, like most Americans, that this is sad.
What they're doing, whether because they're just that
bad at this or because they're doing it
for at the direction of somebody else, at
the expense of American interest,
it's clear.
They I mean, look. As he says, we're
not a serious country. Now is that you?
No. That's the government.
Now what interest would they have in creating
a search a situation where they don't look
like a serious country? Does it sound like
something they would do for their benefit, or
does it sound like somebody else would do
for their benefit at the expense of Americans?
At least consider that
as we will get to at the end
if we have time.
Now there's plenty of these people that I'm
so glad to see are getting called out
left and right right now. The kind of
people that have actively been, like,
it's the people I've called out like this
guy right here who's happy to have me
blocked.
T PD Shawn for the people's voice who
recently before that was like blacklist news. They
got
literally blacklisted by everybody because they were lying
in in embarrassing ways. They shut that down,
started this one, and I've called them up
the entire time for, whether it's him or
all the ones we talk about. Not
nuanced lies, but, like, blatant, aggressive,
clumsy lies that then get promoted by Twitter.
They give this guy a million followers despite
him being, like, one of the most embarrassing
people online or, like, somebody like a,
what's the other guy's name? Matt Wallace or
any of the people we talk about. Like,
spectacularly
naive, childish, and, you know, just lying to
you. Making up entirely false statements like this
guy does all the time. Or
that that wall is going, you know, bombshell
behind the paywall, and then just walking you
through a bunch of stated things that are
online. It's sad. But be nonetheless,
people are rather none even if people see
it, the system keeps them growing.
Now look, you could argue that just there's
that many dumb people that don't care about
the truth. I disagree. I flatly disagree with
that. I think we're being engineered, but
glad to see people are starting to call
this stuff out. Here he is going, Bill
Gates unveils plan to microchip all babies worldwide.
He's done this more than once. It's just
it's not like, my point is always
I'm not saying that Bill Gates does not
have an agenda in regard to wearables or
injections or whatever else, but he didn't say
that, and that's not actually happening. In the
case of what he stated, like, Bill Gates
should not come out and say, I have
a plan to micro that's not the reality.
It's in some it's whether it's RFK Jr.
And Gates saying that they think that this
suit is in the interest of everybody. Not
the same thing. My point is that that's
how they play this game. And then when
you go, oh, he's lying. They go, what?
You think Bill Gates is a good guy?
No. I said, who said that? There's a
whole manipulation game. But Bill, David I came
out and said, but I thought you said
Gates was going to be jailed in Guantanamo
once Trump came to power.
The point is there's so many of these
very childish manipulators that are just going from
story to story. I want you to believe
that everything's going the way it always did,
even though that everything you're saying is wrong
constantly. So my point in showing you all
this is that this whole thing is beginning
to fall apart.
And be not because they care that you
because people are actually starting to see it.
And people more than that, people are actually
starting to call it out.
Things like this, for example.
You know, didn't didn't Jones tell us that
Ukraine war was over, like, six months ago?
Well, RT points out that Trump will now
use presidential authority to arm Ukraine.
Right? Because you can't go through Congress because
it show the point is that they're gonna
arm Ukraine like they always were. And if
they went through Congress, they'd probably get held
up with back and forth vote. So he's
not doing what the people want. He's doing
what he wants with unilateral authority through executive
order like every other despotic person before him.
The point is about continuing to fund Ukraine
like we all told you he would.
And I said, do we even need to
say it?
It's just it's right on the surface, and
this person says, someone explain to me how
this benefits Americans. I will. It doesn't at
all. It is an Israeli
US Western agenda to create a proxy element
they can use against anybody, most likely Russia
at the time, but anywhere. They're Nazis, guys.
They're actual connected Nazis back to the actual
Nazi party and then also neo Nazis.
People like Michael Labed, who was back in
the
here. I'll just grab it.
Most of you know this. I bring it
up when we talk about this topic.
Oh, wasn't that
it? There it is. Haven't brought it up.
Haven't brought it up in a while.
The point is,
this conversation,
not just Azov, the Azov movement,
documents prove the CIA, which we include in
this link in the show, documents prove the
CIA has been cultivating fascist elements in Ukraine
at least since 1948.
Israel got involved in some way along the
path, and as we can show you here
as well.
Let's see.
Shoot. See, I haven't brought these up in
a while. Now they're not coming up anymore.
Let's see.
There it is.
Rights groups demand Israel stop arming neo Nazis
in Ukraine.
Azov movement. Right? So they've been building this
thing the entire time. So the reason it's
important for them is to maintain this manipulation
the same way they're supporting that, you know,
any number of the elements they claim they're
fighting around the world. That's the whole point.
I'll include this. You should check this out.
It's an important story.
And then
Gareth Ike points out the same thing. US
Senate Armed Service Committee approves $500,000,000
for Ukraine. This is what Trump said before
September 2024. He says, quote, that is a
war that's dying to be settled. I will
get it settled before I even become president.
Now, okay, was he lying? Was he wrong?
Did he even care?
Everyone's beginning to ask themselves these things. Finally,
the truth is
that most of the people supporting it didn't
care one way or the other. Here's ultra
Maga Chris, not another penny to Ukraine because
that was the marching order against Biden. Biden
did it. Trump said it's bad. Okay. Trump
gets empowered and then goes, never mind. We
like Ukraine. So they go, what president Trump
is doing with Ukraine is consistent with his
prior messaging and part of the current minerals
deal.
Or except that's not at all the truth,
and you guys were all telling us that
he would stop this the day he started.
But now it's consistent because today narrative.
I mean, it's embarrassing. You don't think they
know they're being hypocritical? They just do it
anyway, guys, because that's what they're meant to
do, I think. But here's the point, this
gets more than just Ukraine.
It's and this is just an individual example
of one of the many ways that Trump
or Biden or anybody else in our in
our government will lie to you to get
you to think they're on your side and
then people work their entire careers trying to
make it all make sense because they don't
wanna be proven wrong. That's what we keep
seeing.
As I said, one of them is lying.
Actually, I I I don't think I grabbed
this one. Here is Besent,
Besant Besant,
however you say his name,
saying
that most of these countries didn't even reach
out to Donald Trump.
Right? Saying, well, he he would have made
deals, but they didn't even wanna reach out
to him. You know, as opposed as instead
of recognizing that he didn't actually succeed in
all the things he said he was trying
to accomplish.
Right? So here's the first clip. Here's what
he recently said. You know, Besant or obviously
his name.
Then I'll show you what Trump said before
that, which I think is very relevant.
When you talk about these letters and you
talk about kind of the
90 deals in ninety days, or at least
the president did back in April Or the
claim of that, which didn't even come close
to happening.
So far that we've seen three, and they're
not
concrete deals the way that we're used to
seeing trade deals. They're frameworks. Mhmm.
The president has a reputation,
self described deal maker.
So why haven't we seen the kind of
deals that he promised in the last ninety
days?
Again, he didn't prom promise this. He did?
When we send out the 100 letters to
these countries, that will set their tariff rate.
So we're gonna have a 100 done
in the Oh, okay. So just not even
remotely close to what was told, but we
have a 100 things, so just count it
like that. Right? Just reframe the way you
perceive how it works, and then we're on
the same page. Right? No. No. He didn't
do what he said he was gonna do.
This is about trying to recorrect the narrative
so you can pretend that he did everything
you promised. The next few days. And That's
not a deal. That's a threat.
No. That's the level. That that's the deal.
No. That's coercion. That's power that's coercion through
power and saying you do this or you're
we're gonna take that. Or if you don't
do that, we're gonna give you more sanctions.
That's not a deal, guys. That's strong-arm attack.
Wanna trade with The United States, this is
But that's not a negotiation. That's just a
Well, many many of these countries many of
these countries never even contacted us. So
that that's the thing about being the deficit.
Right. So it's Trump's fault.
Right. So he says, I'm gonna make these
deals, and then they don't contact him, so
that's why it didn't happen.
Is that I mean, if a child is
not gonna buy this. Right? That that's is
it if he's the one that promised these
things would happen,
then it's his responsibility to make them happen.
Country, Dana, is when you were the deficit
country, you have the leverage. These are surplus
countries
that they have
exported more to us than we export to
them. It's all irrelevant to the point.
He didn't do it. Right? Regardless of why
you think they should have done it, it's
their responsibility. Trump didn't come up and say,
there was people that are responsible will reach
out to me and make a deal, and
I'll just whatever you wanna frame it as.
That's not what he said. Right? So he's
lying to you. Or rather, one of them
is, here's what Trump had to say. This
is what he had to say about the
countries that were going, please, Trump. Please make
a deal, and Biden just couldn't figure it
out. And then he steps in, and that's
not what happened. So So you can decide
who's telling the truth. History
of our country. And don't let some of
these politicians go around saying, you know, because
I'm telling you, these countries are calling us
up,
kissing my ass. They are
they are dying to make a deal. Please
please, sir, make a deal. I'll do anything.
I'll do anything, sir.
And then I'll see some rebel repop You
don't realize how weak that makes him look?
That he has to frame other kind? Please,
sir. I mean, do you really think that
anybody was reaching out like that, really?
It's a it's a game. They're playing a
game, but, you know, with real life consequences.
Looking, you know, some guy that wants to
grandstand,
say, I think that congress should take over
negotiations. Let me Yeah. You know why? You
know, the constitution,
maybe. Now, again, I shouldn't say it. Like,
if there's a negotiation to be made, that
doesn't have to go. The point is about
the deal, the process, whether it's war, whether
it is anything we're talking about. Yes. That's
supposed to include congress. Executive orders are not
supposed to be the way this works. But
if you want Trump to personally handle negotiations,
that's fine. The point, though, is that the
actual process, the decision in regard to how
and what, that's how congress is supposed to
play its role.
They just have lied to you, and people
don't or rather they've convinced you to ask
for your own manipulation.
Tell you you don't negotiate like I negotiate.
So
one of them is lying. Can we all
just finally admit that this was yet another
political manipulation by the tired two party illusion?
All, like, all,
like so many we've seen throughout the past
year, then ask why
and who benefits?
Well, clearly, they want you thinking that he's
this big mastermind because that makes your narrative
feel better. The truth is that didn't happen.
Honest people are being clear about that. But,
you know, Ukraine, still going, still funding. Israel,
still going, still funding. I mean, and and
the bombing in Somalia and right? I mean,
the just be honest about it. That is
not what was promised.
He's lying to you is the point because
now they're pretending like it all makes sense.
But here
is what the typical cheerleaders do. That's what
we're gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna make a
real this they're cheerleading. That's what this is.
It says,
good morning to everyone who doesn't trust their
government.
I hope that's all of you.
That was July 11. And then Blakely rightly
points out, here he is with that stupid
Epstein binder.
But here, I I simply grab this
from before where he says, when it comes
to foreign policy, I trust president Trump.
Okay. That's like a this is you point.
Right?
So all of you that don't trust your
government, but you trust Trump. Right? That you're
a child. Right? You know what you're doing,
and you're just trying to pretend like you
he knows what we think. He knows what
the rest of us think, that we don't
trust the government. So he tries to play
into that.
But this is what he thinks.
Blind followed, which he's proven
over and over and over and over as
they're now trying to lay
shade for the whole Epstein cover up. But
as Jason Basler, an honest person in the
conversation, says, Fauci, not arrested. Deep state, not
arrested. Epstein list, not arrested. Fau Doge fraud,
not arrested. Prince Andrew, not arrested. Just lay
Maxwell's clients, not arrested.
The peasants get prison. The ruling class get
protection. Accountability ends where power begins,
which, by the way, goes right back to
that clip
of Tucker
and and,
Segar or Segar, I think.
Same point. That's what we're seeing. He's telling
them, we are on your side
if you believe that. Now let's listen to
what Tucker said at Turning Point USA as
Orwell points out, you know, speaking to, you
know, a lot of young adults and children,
is that you think about the way that
they're framing the conversation. Right? But the point
is
this is supposed to be some massive turning
point for the conversation.
Now it is for a lot of people
that need Tucker to point the way. It
is for a lot of people who've never
heard this before because they only listen to
quasi mainstream platforms or mainstream alternative media. None
of that's to say that it's wrong or
bad that they're finally starting to see it.
Right? That's always a positive. No matter what,
period. But as I said before,
recognize how often in situations like this, like
we saw from COVID and anything else, where
people
maybe not Tucker. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he's
on your side. But people, in some cases,
will step out from the control structure and
start to tell you what they already know
you all see, which feels crazy. Oh my
god. The guy from inside is starting to
tell you what we all are being told
is a lie.
And they do that so you go, he's
on our side. And then the next manipulation,
that's what they're set up for. If you
don't think by now or haven't seen by
now that that's what goes on, that they
really do think that way and that far
ahead, then I don't know what to tell
you. We've proven it to you time and
time again. All I'm saying is question whether
or not.
Right? Question everything while considering all possibilities. That's
the only way to do this anymore.
Question whether he's lying. Question whether I'm lying.
Question whether I'm wrong. Question whether he's wrong.
Question whether he's believes it but's also wrong
because he was misled. Question everything. But consider
what he's saying regardless. That applies to everybody
no matter how ridiculous.
No matter whether it's corporate media, mainstream alternative
media, or anything, consider it. If it's truthful,
if you can prove it, then use it
to talk about it. So here's what Tucker
had to say at this recent conversation. I'm
only gonna play at the beginning of this
one and I one of the points that's
been circulating. This is a ten minute clip.
Well, here's how it starts. And I find
this interesting.
Vote. And, but I did vote this time.
And, I don't like to vote because I
don't believe in any of them.
And this time, I I really felt like
I know Trump well. I love Trump personally.
And what we were looking at was just
so awful and totalitarian
and stupid.
And it wasn't even the arguments that I
disagreed with from the Kamala Harris. It's weird
to even say her name now. Who was
Isn't it strange? Like, are we really trying
to pretend right now that what Kamala Harris
is putting forward was in any way less
crazy than what's currently happening?
Why? Because you put a little woke spin
on it? Yeah. That's insane. And what they're
doing is insane. But our the whole point
is, guys, if you can't recognize that everything
they were telling you Kamala was going to
allow is now currently happening under Trump, then
you're either not paying attention or you're lying.
Everything. A bigger government, more spending.
Technic yeah. That's what's going on right now.
And so, look, I get it. She's crazy
and bad. So is Biden. So is to
all of our government, in my opinion. But
for them to start like this and talk
about it this way, it just shows me
a level of dishonesty in my opinion. Maybe
he still thinks that way. But you're smart
enough. You can look stand back and objectively,
with discernment, look at what's currently happening and
look at what they told you would happen
under Kamala.
Show me what the difference is.
I mean, I just really think about it.
What was being proposed that it's in any
more way way more radical than what's coming
out now, or is it just in a
direction of partisan that you don't like? Right?
We don't like the the certain wedge issues
they point to, so we like it like
this with a red hat on it. I
I it's it's just important to think about
like that because I genuinely think the main
point of today is that most of you
out there are finally starting to see beyond
these flimsy constructs.
And what we were looking at was just
so awful and totalitarian
and stupid.
And it wasn't even the arguments that I
disagreed with from the Kamala Harris. It's weird
to even say her name now. Who was
that exactly? It was like a bad dream.
But it wasn't even so much the arguments
I disagreed with, though I did Sorry. One
more thing.
I mean, really?
Can't even believe like, think about it's like
think about what's currently happening.
What they're currently continuing, the genocide, what they're
rolling out, not even a fraction of which
in regard to the technocratic agenda was really
starting to happen under Biden.
Again, my point is they're all part of
it. They just knew now is the time
to roll it out because of who was
pacified, the people who'd be most resistant to
it. But just him framing it like that,
I just have to stress, that seems shockingly
manipulative to me. But maybe, to be objective,
it is because he just needs to tap
in with this audience. And that's certainly worth
considering. Maybe Tucker finally sees it all and
is no he knows this audience is captured.
And so he goes at it in a
way, like I often talk about, that makes
them under that feels like he's on your
side and then lays the truth on him.
See? I of course, I consider that. I
hope for that because we're objective,
but question the other side of it too.
But okay. I'm gonna let it play more
here by pointing this last part bad dream.
But it wasn't even so much the arguments
I dis Oh, and, you know, the arguments.
So you don't disagree with the arguments? You
agree you disagree with how they did it?
That seems like a weird thing to say,
doesn't it? Isn't the whole point of the
democrats
argument, like, the whole the policy was all
bad? Well, he's basically saying the policies are
real washed. It's the way they framed
it. Just interesting to point out. But okay.
Let's listen. We were though I just definitely
disagree with the arguments,
it was the style of argument that drove
me completely bonkers,
summarized
most crisply by shut up racist.
Yeah. Sorry. I forgot I was gonna stop
here too.
You mean, like, currently happening
more than I've ever seen? Like, you realize
during the Biden administration, that was clearly a
major thing, but I've never seen more enforcement
action arrest deportation than I than than right
now in regard to that very point.
Shut up racist, antisemitism.
You're talking about Jewish people, Israel, not yeah.
That's what we're talking about. I mean,
way, way, way more enforcement of that through
actual I mean, people that are just simply
criticizing
Israel.
So under Biden's administration, yeah, there was a
lot of, like, momentum in regard to businesses
and different cancel culture. Yeah? But from the
government perspective, show me where Biden and the
rest were arresting people and putting them in
jail for saying a racist comment. In The
UK, that was going a hell of a
lot faster. But just and, again, I'm in
no way saying that wasn't happening. What I'm
saying is the radical escalation of that under
Trump,
but only through the vein of antisemitism
is one of the most obvious parts of
this whole conversation.
So
think about that too. Whatever you said, it
was shut up racist. And it's like, but
wait. You know, first of all, I'm not
a racist, but that's not even the point.
The point is
I just told you what I think.
I just asked you an entirely legitimate question.
Mostly, what the hell are you doing? And
rather than answer it,
you didn't pay me the respect
that you would a human being. You treated
me like a slave or an animal by
telling me to stop barking. Shut up, racist.
Yeah. Okay. Let's keep making the same point.
How much you wanna bet that half that
audience is doing the same thing without recognizing
it when it comes to people talking about
Israel?
You know I'm right, guys. It's obvious. It's
everywhere you look, especially in the aggressively partisan
fields like this.
But, again, maybe he knows that. Maybe he's
trying to broach that with them and get
him to see it. I'm genuinely considering that.
And I won't put up with that because
I'm not a slave or an animal. I'm
an American citizen, an adult man who pays
his taxes.
So, you know You gotta love cheering for
paying your taxes. Talk about an enslaved audience.
So I ask people questions for a living,
and very often I get answers that I
don't care for, that I disagree with, that
I think are stupid, but at least their
answers.
At least the person responding
is treating me like a human being with
a soul created in the image of the
creator.
He's paying me the respect that every human
being is due.
When you ask a direct question to someone
in charge,
you are due. That person is morally bound
to give you an answer.
He's not bound to agree with you, but
he's bound to stop
and answer your question.
And the left never did that. They would
dismiss you out of hand. Yep. You are
not worth listening to. Be quiet.
Now look. I'll I'll very much point out
that the cancel culture individual dynamic outside the
government was way stronger in regard to, you
know, any topic really that they felt was
racist or offensive, which is just insane and
and worthy of ridicule in my opinion. But
the point is from the government now, far
less of the individual conservatives or Republicans. You
see the shift? Now the government is the
one reacting in a strong and constant way
around anything they think it relates to antisemitism.
Now, frankly, I'm far more concerned about the
government using that to enforce against Americans than
I am about round them Democrats trying to
get you canceled from your job, but also
matters in his worthy of criticism and coverage.
But you see the difference? One matters a
hell of a lot more to me for
obvious reasons.
And that's, of course, where the impulse to
censorship comes from.
It comes from the belief that you don't
deserve
to speak Yep. Because you're not fully human.
They own you. I mean, you I could
let this go. You could you could make
this literally about what's currently happening from Israel,
Republicans, and anybody speaking out against all of
that.
But it applies both ways, which is hopefully
the point you've taken from this.
Now here's another one,
shorter one. This one is from posted by
doctor Simon Godek, who has shown himself to
be very
demonstrating integrity with all of this by showing
you that he's not afraid to call out
whoever he thinks is wrong. He and this
is he says, quote, how does a guy
go from being a math teacher at the
Dalton School without a college degree to owning
multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest
residential home in Manhattan? Where do you get
all that money from? How about Epstein? Tucker
is asking the questions the government won't.
Now listen to all this.
Consider,
like I've said, that it could be either
way.
But what he's saying here is what is
the real shaken moment for everybody,
pointing out Israel.
I think that's caused a lot of people
to attack him,
which is one of the reasons why I
consider that this is something that may actually
be happening, but I don't know how it
makes sense with the years of not pointing
them. You never know. I'm open to it.
But I'm you know, my I'm honestly, if
I'm gonna be genuine I mean, I always
am, but to be stated forward about my
opinion, I'm leaning towards the side that I
don't think this feels genuine. That's just my
personal opinion, but it's hard. You know me?
I'm like with government.
It's it takes it's gonna take a long
continuous track record of action and follow-up for
me to ever really think that they're not
just doing the right thing to get you
on their side for the bigger manipulation.
But I will eventually cut people show me
consistency and an objectivity and honesty.
I will eventually you know, that will be
the reality. So my point is simply highlighting
that this is
a massive shift, and it is clearly having
ripples through the conversation. It is clearly causing
strife and and, like, fracturing in the partisan
movement.
But you have to at least consider that
it could be used in that long term
way. Acceptable.
And I think the real answer is Jeffrey
Epstein was working on behalf of Intel services,
probably not American.
And we have every right to ask on
whose behalf was he working. How does a
guy go from being a math teacher at
the Dalton School in the late seventies with
no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a
private island, and the largest residential
house in Manhattan?
Where did all the money come from?
And no one has ever gotten to the
bottom of that because no one has ever
tried.
And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who
watches that this guy had direct connections to
a foreign government. Now that's not really a
fair statement. A lot of people have tried
and including Whitney's work and others have actually
proven a lot of the things that they
claim nobody knows.
Again, I find it hard to believe that
he doesn't know that, but that's a different
point.
Now, no one's allowed to say that that
foreign government is Israel because we have been
somehow cowed
into the bombshell. Naughty.
There is nothing wrong with saying that. There
is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing
anti Semitic about saying. There's nothing even anti
Israel about saying that. I should also go
ahead and say that there's nothing brave about
saying that after a year and a half
of genocide and everybody like us hacking down
the weeds to make this something people can
talk about. But, you know, same point as
always. But that I think is important to
point out that after a period of time,
one thing Steve and I would talk about
all the you know, is that ultimately there's
a time when it's safe to start talking
about certain things. Now there will always be
pushback from the core of the of the
structure, but there's there there was a time
when this was impossible to talk about even
amongst people that would be open to certain
things like this. And people like us were
wading into that because we cared, because it
was correct, because we believed in what we
were saying, because our integrity drove us not
whether somebody would censor us or what was
gonna pay. Right? And we have seen those
actions throughout the time. Now look. I'm not
gonna
I think this is important. I'm not just
trying to belabor the point. I think it's
very important that we are watching how this
plays out, especially since it's also possible that
somebody like him could be used, and he's
not even aware of that.
Same thing we should ask about everybody.
So now it's at a time when this
has already been allowed to fester and continue.
And finally, we're seeing some traction and people
like this step into it and start saying
these things that make me very suspicious. But
the interesting thing is saying it here at
a time when it will have effect on
his career and will reach a lot of
people who clearly wanted him to talk about
Israel. They cheered.
Really quickly, here's what Daniel McAdams had to
say since it's relevant to what I'm saying
right now. He said, listen to the applause
among this right wing crowd when he points
out that Epstein intelligence connection was to Israel.
It's both in my opinion, but it says
this is absolutely revolutionary.
Not that Tucker is the one rather, I
guess it is because Tucker is the one
saying it to them, but the statement's not
revolutionary. It's the fact that this is breaking
through with these crowds and that it's happening
with Tucker saying it. Young conservatives cannot stand
Israel.
They the most overlooked political shift in the
past fifty years. Interesting.
My entire life pretty much in Washington
where I knew and loved a number of
people, including one very close person who worked
at CIA.
That has never
prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA
has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch
of people, participated in the murder of a
sitting US president.
It's got a whole trail of crimes.
That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It
Doesn't make me anti American in any sense.
I was born here. My family's been here
for hundreds of years. I love this country.
That's why I live here.
So criticize And to point out, plenty of
people argue that he has far too many
connection to the CIA. It's worth pointing out.
The behavior of a government agency
does not make you a hater. It makes
you a free person.
It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to
do that
because you're not a slave. You're a citizen.
And you have a right to expect that
your government will not act against your interest,
and you have a right to demand that
foreign governments not be allowed to act against
your interest. Yeah. That's not creepy.
It shouldn't be forbidden.
And yet, all of us have trained ourselves
to believe that you can't say that somehow.
That that's, like, too naughty and forbidden. And
the effect
of making that off limits has been to
create a lot of resentment. And I'll say
it Is that really what Hate
online. Hate. Where people hate a lot of
resentment. And I'll say it, hate online.
Is that really the focal point?
Right? Like, let's just listen to that again.
That your government will not act against your
interest, and you have a right to demand
that foreign governments not be allowed to act
against your interest. Okay. I'm completely on board.
But the reality is both of those things
are happening.
Like, yeah, we can't miss pull the punch
where it's most important. We are all recognizing
that's what's going on, that they are acting
against our interest for a foreign government. Now
maybe he doesn't believe that.
That's not creepy.
It shouldn't be forbidden. Except the fact that
he's had plenty of interviews with people that
literally tell him that, then he agrees and
basically points out the same. But as we've
said in the past, interview doesn't mean you
meet agree the same thing.
And yet all of us have trained ourselves
to believe that you can't say that somehow.
Have we?
See, I don't I this is what I'm
I mean, I get it. Maybe he's reaching
them, but that's not true. And a lot
of people have been braving this for a
very long time well before I'm talking about
it
and getting called out by people like him.
Remember, his narratives are very different on Fox.
Remember, Iran should be destroyed. Nobody should exist.
Like, they it's very mainstream.
Maybe he changed his mind.
But overall,
that's not a knock accurate framing. And frankly,
most people have, I think, been becoming aware
of this for a very long time. So
if you're gonna frame this, I think, accurately,
it should be that people have been trying
to ring this bell for a long time,
and people like him and this media field
have been keeping this under wraps.
But that's, like, too naughty and forbidden, and
the effect
of making that off limits
has been to create a lot of resentment.
And I'll say it, hate online,
where people feel like they can't just say,
like, what the hell is this? You have
the former Israeli prime minister living in your
house.
You have had all this contact with the
foreign government.
Were you working on behalf
of Mossad?
Were you running a blackmail operation
on behalf of foreign government? By the way,
every single person in Washington DC thinks that.
I've never met anyone who doesn't think that.
Okay. So think about how crazy that is.
So now you can say that's a everyone
thinks that, then why has it been this
idea you just framed as we're all been
tricked into not seeing this, but now everybody
knows that? I just I don't know. That
feels dishonest the way it's being framed.
I don't know any of them that hate
Israel,
but no one feels they can say that.
Why?
And I think the longer that we play
along with it,
the more subterranean
and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes.
So I think it's better just to say
it right out loud.
Did this happen? And, of course, that question
has been asked to the government of Israel,
and their answer is we're not gonna tell
you.
And I think our answer should be no.
No. No. As long as we're sending you
money, if you were committing crimes on our
soil, we have an absolute right to know.
Did you do this or not?
And yet I mean, it's it's that's such
a basic yes. Obviously.
Yes. We have a right to know. Right?
But I'm glad he's saying it. I'm glad
that you're here for it, but it's pretty
basic to say that we have a right
to know if a foreign country is manipulating
our government than what's happening in our country.
Yes. Obviously.
They would it's no different than, say, China
or anybody else.
Interesting, though, the way that this has evolved
and how clearly this is reaching average people
in every walk of the conversation. Everybody has
been so brainwashed
into thinking that's somehow an expression of hate
or bigotry
when it's not. Right. It's a baseline question
that every US citizen has a right to
an answer on. Yep. What the hell was
this?
Yeah. Exactly.
Now, of course, again, the main point is
that many, many, many people have been screaming
about that, proving that for a very long
time and and and presenting it to people
like Tucker Carlson. There were only now it's
now being allowed to break through. Now I
that could be one of a few things.
It could be that this is, you know,
so obvious. They know we all see it
that it's about trying to release the steam
and drive a, you know, controlled demolition,
or it could simply be that this is
something that is now, you know, no longer
in needed, and it's something we're kind of
rolling into the next agenda.
Or it could genuinely be a split.
There could be a fracture. We saw Elon
Musk say say Trump's on the list, and
that whole fracture happened. I mean, it it
there's parts of this that feel real, that
there really is I mean, this again, understanding
that we're dealing with sort of a dying
empire,
that makes sense. That you have people that
will break off and make their own factions
and try to fight for control. I mean,
if that there it's the,
what's that? What's the the analogy?
I
guess rats fleeing a ship kind of a
thing. I mean, you can look at it
a lot of different ways. My point is
that it wouldn't be outside their own possibility
for me that this is genuinely a a
split and new development as opposed to just
trying to use the lie as as commonly
what you know, the most typical
is people in the corporate media or people
in the inside
giving you truth to get your trust for
the next lie. That's very common for me
in my experience. But understand that it very
well could be
that there's something shifting. I'm I'm gen I
mean, obviously, that's what I'm hoping for.
Vigilant Fox simply breaks this down saying Tucker
Carlson just named who he believes really funded
the Epstein crimes. Said it he said is,
what he said is guaranteed to make many
in Washington furious.
He said on Tuesday, Carlson delivered two theories
on why Pam Bondi won't release the files.
One, Trump was involved,
but Carlson thought this explanation was not very
likely, of course. Another reason why I'm suspicious
about the whole thing. Then came theory two,
which was the that Carlson believed Intel services
are at the very center of the story,
US and Israel, and they're being protected, which
is the same point. It says I think
that seems like the most plausible. So that
means Trump administration is protecting Israel.
Exactly my point. Now one one thing I'll
add to is when people say,
you know, but he thought that was unlikely.
And most conservative I mean, I shouldn't say
it like that. But I think most people
right now are starting to recognize that's probably
the case. And when I point that out
that he might say, well, probably not likely.
It's weird how these people in this high
level in the mainstream media or sidestepping that
get a pass. Or it's, oh, well, he
just doesn't wanna say it too bluntly because
of his audience. Why is that a thing
you'll say in a positive way? That's called
audience capture. That means people that are you're
not willing to say the full truth because
you think your audience won't accept it. That's
insane to me. Just worth considering that because
on the I'm I'm I will always when
I report the truth, the only thing that
matters for me when I report anything is
that I believe it's true. Not whether or
not you all will agree with it or
not. That doesn't even weigh on my converse
that's not even in the conversation for me.
It is about whether it's true or not,
which is what you come here for.
But, no, again, the point is that both
of those things apply. Right? Theory two that
they're covering up for Israel would be Trump
in the same light. Friday night, it says,
while speaking in front of a live audience
at Turning Point USA,
Carlson came to his conclusion. He boldly said
he believes that foreign intelligence was bind behind
it with Israel.
Someone who agrees with Carlson's assessment is John
Kiriakou, c e CIA whistleblower who's talking about
a lot of these things. But it says,
he addressed the claims that he's taking money
from the Qatari government head on.
What his what was his reaction to this
claim? He literally laughed out loud. He says,
maybe I was taking tons of money from
some bad country. One of the bad countries
you're not allowed to talk about, like, Cutter
burst into laughter.
It's a weird way to frame that because,
look, the guy the point is the whole
Cutter sidestep is a loomer thing and the
rest.
Cutter is an extension of the Israeli network,
guys. That's how the I mean, cut that's
why Cutter was used to fund Hamas for
Israel.
So it's a weird kind of sidestep.
But he says that's the most hilarious claim.
Cutter's kind of controlling our conversation.
Cutter, evil Cutter.
Okay. So you're you're you're dismissive of it
is to make it sound like Cutter's, you
know, like, Cutter's not the evil one. Israel
I agree with that. Israel's the real problem
there. But if you can't acknowledge that Cutter
is an extension of the same problem, all
you're doing is sidestepping that by claiming it's
not Israel. But it is though. Seems to
be counterintuitive.
An audience member asked if Carlson was laughing,
and he confirmed, I am laughing. And so
I've actually been to Qatar. It's awesome. Never
taken a dime from the Qataris or,
or or the Qataris or whatever they're called.
Great country, but I'm but even if I
was on their payroll of Qatar, which I
guess I'm like, I can now.
But even if I was taking money, it
still wouldn't make the question any less relevant.
Why is this war with Iran a good
idea? That seems like a really weird way
to frame that conversation. Now you can watch
it for yourself.
Of course, we all we've talked about this
for a long time. Include this article, one
of the many that people reference, but the
point is that he said this publicly. Epps
or, Acosta rather. We all we just recently
showed you this. I mean, you already you
the bottom line is he said it was
he was told to back off.
He says, apparently, that back in the day,
he had just been on a meeting with
Epstein's case. He cut the non prosecution deal.
He had been told to back off, that
Epstein was above his pay grade. I was
told Epstein belonged to intelligence.
You know, this is not even a secret,
guys. It's public information about this, and it
is Israel. I believe the CIA and Mossad
in the overlap.
But here's the clip I played for you
earlier. In case you forgot, I'll play it
again,
where here's this conversation with Sager about the
idea of why he thinks this is being
covered up, which the simple point, the Donald
Trump administration in this case, but really the
main point is just the US government, whoever's
in power or in the
seat, broadcasting to anyone listening that we're doing
this. We're broadcasting to you, Epstein Network
customers,
controllers that we are fighting for you, and
you have to you have to have our
back. That's what the point is. I do
I I think it makes sense.
Have to listen to this exchange between Tucker
and Sager because they expose the exact purpose
why the Trump administration
has to cover up the Epstein.
The whole thing that this tape shows he
didn't kill himself is like a joke.
But worse than that, it's a joke that
we all get. Like, they're not fooling anybody.
So I feel like we're at a dangerous
point now. Yeah. I agree because the lie
is more it's not the lie at this
point is not even part of trying to
convince any of this is true. Yes. Yes.
The lie is a signal to everybody else
involved in the scheme that to the to
the ultimate end, the United States government will
go to protect all of you. Yes. And
that's the quest for what purpose?
Can you say that again? Yes. It's I'm
sorry. It's a signal.
The lie is not for you and me.
The lie is for those implicated to say,
no matter what, we will protect you. And
then we have to start asking the question,
why? As in, what is the purpose of
this entire thing? Why does it matter that
it happens right before the Israeli prime minister
comes to Washington for the third time? Oh,
a lot of noticing going on in that
last part. And the timing of that,
definitely not a coincidence. I mean, it's basically
undeniable at this point that this story is
about intelligence,
specifically Epstein's ties to a certain foreign intelligence.
Here is what judge Napolitano with, George Galloway
had to say about this. I'm just showing
you how what what the level this you
know, if it's breaching if it's Galloway and
not the Paul George DePaulitano level, I mean,
that that that is despite them, I don't
consider mainstream media. I do think I think
they both have more integrity in that. The
point is, this is at a mainstream media
level.
So consider that this is what they're saying.
And Trump
intervening
in that asinine way
saying
I can't believe people are still talking about
Jeffrey Epstein,
when he and his
whole MAGA movement never stopped
talking
about Jeffrey Epstein.
What changed, do you think?
What happened in the
evidence bundle
that persuaded them
not to proceed?
I think that,
I'm gonna tell you exactly what I think.
I think Trump's name is on the list.
I think Mossad knows it.
I think Mossad told their American stenographer
who happens to be the director of the
CIA who takes down and regurgitates everything
Mossad told him. And I think that stenographer
whispered it into the president's ear,
and he's terrified
that this will come out because he knows
it will be the beginning of the end,
whether there's a Republican congress or a Democrat,
congress.
That's what I honestly believe
has happened. Now, obviously, I haven't seen, the
files. I I can explain to you the
way the system works.
But when a federal judge,
orders that a document or a set of
documents be preserved
and published to the public,
There is zero justification
for it not
happening.
The president's reaction you put your finger on
it, George. I played that tape several times
on my own show. The president's reaction was
so personal, so defensive to attack the, questioner
Mhmm. That it was obvious he was terrified,
to have a truthful answer.
Well, I mean, that's the rest is opinion.
We know your intent your your thought on
what he thought and felt is up to
you. The point is the way he responded
was defensive. At least it was, you know,
kind of
unnecessary with what was happening. And, obviously, counter
to what people have been saying.
Don't forget, by the way. So, basically, point
being that as, as the tweet stated and
as he said in that that he believes
he Mossad knows that he's on the list.
But don't forget, as we'll get to later
in the show, that other not he was
talking about Ratcliffe and CIA, but we also
know that we have, Huckabee and and many
other examples.
This is Walt's.
State department revealed to be using an Israeli
intelligence linked chat app involved in the Trump
hack. That's the he was using a thing
called TeleMessage, which is literally an app that
Israeli intelligence created, which archives the signal messaging
that they're using in the inner circle of
the White House. And it got such little
coverage, it terrifies me. But the point is,
guys, every day, we're seeing examples of this,
like the lacking of the ethics pledges. You
know, seeing how relevant these things can become
day and day, you know, after days and
days go by where we're watching more and
more evidence that Israel was basically controlling this
government.
Every single day, we're seeing these things.
Now here is,
just showing you more example of that people
are calling this out left and right. Steve
Bannon confronted over Jeffrey Epstein at MAGA event.
Somebody's screaming, Trump has become the deep state.
It just continued to show you that people
are beginning to call this out from within
their own movement.
Here's Viva Fray saying, yeah. Trump's this person
simply says roundabout way to say Trump's definitely
on the s Epstein list. And Viva Fray,
who's just seems to become like some kind
of, you know, control narrative manager, says, yeah.
Trump's on the Epstein list, and the Biden
administration didn't leak it.
This same old tired effort. And I simply
said, well, because partisanship is a tool to
manipulate the weak minded. Or more
simply, they're all they are all compromised
and likely on the list, so none of
them want it released.
And I said, it's not really that complicated
of a possibility to consider. But oddly, many
of you state this like it's a mic
drop.
And this person says, speculation is not journalism.
Now I I you know, I think he
he he followed up. I think he's more
responding to it in a general sense as
he said. I didn't mean that. Bottom line,
I just said I couldn't agree more.
I'm merely proposing a possibility. Right? I'm not
coming in saying, this is what I I
know. I'm saying that it's possible,
right, that this is something that
that they don't wanna release it on any
side because they're all potentially compromised.
That's simply an obvious possibility. So to say,
yeah, Trump didn't you know, they basically he's
on it because they the simple point to
make it, you know, not convoluted is that
they keep pointing out
that he's not on the list because otherwise,
the Democrats would have released it.
That that is a self serving assumption.
He this is a lawyer. So to me,
this becomes the partisan example of how it
circumvents logic.
I said I couldn't agree more. I'm merely
proposing a possibility.
One, they are pretending does not exist.
And using that to present a self serving
assumption that Trump is not on the list.
Simply, my point is that I'm not speculating
here other than the rather that I'm not
framing it as journalism. That's what the the
partisan field is trying to make it out
to be the case that you're ignoring all
the other possibilities to to make an argument
that he's not there. It's just desperation as
far as I can tell, but it's everywhere.
Now on the Epstein conversation, we talked about
this on the seventh. DOJ FBI claim Epstein
had no client list, was suicide,
and that there was no blackmail, all in
one fell swoop fell swoop, and clearly,
nobody bought it. Now Cash and Bongino and
Bondi and even Tulsi, they all seem to
be really, really, kind of unnerved right now
and turning on each other. Now I'll include
this thread, by the way, which even got
its own fact check showing you that can
agreeing with what he said or, actually,
the breaking nine one one tweet got fact
checked and agrees with what he was putting
forward, which is that this video does not
show what they claim it does. So even
on its surface, the video is not what
they claim.
We know we have that minute gap where
they tried to gaslight you about, which I'll
touch on in a minute. But the threat
is just in it's unbelievable. Go through it
for yourself. We went through everyone on the
last show.
It's, I mean, it's almost as if they
tried to use a video that they knew
would debunk almost all of their claims.
Again,
either they're that incompetent or somebody out there
wants this country to fall apart.
And it doesn't have to be only those
two things. There's plenty of other possibilities. My
point is that I just
it's everything that keeps happening, it's like the
COVID thing. How many times can we pretend
that they did something that turned out to
be maximize damage maximizing damage?
One time, two time, you know, maybe. But
every single choice,
at some point, you go, okay. They wanted
to hurt people. Right? So it's the same
kind of idea here. Every time they seem
to be like, here here's a good point.
Somebody that's close to me is clear is
is
believes in Trump, wants to support him, which,
you know, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you should.
Question everything.
My point, though, is that every time we
keep bumping up against this, the answer is
not, yeah. Yeah. We it becomes well, there
must be something
that there there must be a reason.
Could because you they they can't be doing
this political suicide. Right? There must be a
reason.
You know? Well, yeah, there there there's always
a reason, but maybe that reason is that
they're dishonest and that they've been lying to
you or or that they're captured by Israel.
The the kind of giving them the benefit
of the doubt and and assuming there must
be a reason this all makes sense is
exactly what they want from you as, like,
the last
tendril holding this all together.
Go through this. There's no denying that they're
caught. Okay? And I the question is, what's
driving all this? That's what Tucker's asking. Right?
What's going on right now? We all see
it. This came out recently. This was metadata
showing the FBI's raw, which is what they
claimed, prison video was modified.
I mean, even James Lee said that that
TikTok said it was AI modified AI manipulated.
But the point is that they every which
way now or this whole thing is falling
apart.
So here's another clip from Greg Reese breaking
this down. I think it's important to see.
This account says something else is going on.
It's political suicide, and they know it.
Gregory says, sure seems like it, in regard
to political suicide.
So my point's the same about something must
be going on. Well, you know, that's you
know, that we don't know that. Maybe it's
exactly what it looks like. That's one possibility.
But the assumption of there must be a
reason it all makes sense is dangerous to
toy with. But I simply said, you both
know my answer, and I think it's never
been more obvious. That's the art the show
we did, the Trump new Trump administration and
the technocratic Zionist coup of the United States.
So let's watch Greg. Here's the the article,
by the way, of the show we did
on that topic. Let's watch Greg's video, and
we'll come back to this in one more
part, and we'll get into the Epstein overlap
in-depth.
Donald Trump has been friends with Jeffrey Epstein
for years. In 02/2002,
he told New York Magazine that he's, quote,
known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's
a lot of fun to be with. It
is even said that he likes beautiful women
as much as I do, and many of
them are on the younger side. No doubt
about it. Jeffrey enjoys his social life. Close
quote.
Jeffrey Epstein claimed he introduced Donald Trump to
Melania.
Epstein is known for grooming beautiful women for
powerful men.
On 07/06/2019,
Epstein was arrested.
Two weeks later, he was murdered in his
jail cell, all during president Trump's first term.
Shortly after Trump began his second term, political
agents and useful idiots posed for the cameras
with DOJ binders as if justice was coming,
and nothing followed
until this week when we were told that
the DOJ
and the FBI
concluded that Epstein had no client list and
died by suicide.
While this isn't fooling the awakening masses,
political agents and useful idiots
began doing their best to defend Trump and
steer everyone towards immigration,
where the solution
will obviously be the digital ID for every
US citizen.
The overwhelming majority of US government representatives
are the recipients of hundreds of millions of
dollars paid out by APEC,
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell
were clearly part of a sexual blackmail operation
run by the Mossad and the CIA
to further own the American government. This is
why our government officials are all on board
with the genocide being committed by The US
and Israel.
Do you think that there can be a
two state solution that creates an independent I
don't know. I'd ask maybe that question. You
have the greatest man in the world to
answer that age old question, two state. Go
ahead. Just give him your honest answer.
I think, Palestinian should have all the powers
to govern themselves,
but none of the powers should threaten us.
That means that certain powers, like overall security,
will always remain in our hands.
Now that is a fact. Meaning that you'll
never allow an actual state. There's no way
around
that. You don't have autonomy or sovereignty if
Israel's controlling parts of how you live, which
is already what they've always wanted.
So nothing new. Nothing this is the same
old thing that's happened every single time. And
Trump, many times over the years, has tried
to contort this into some new deal that
we'll save, and he wants to be known
as the one that solved this thing that
nobody could.
He's blindly supporting his IS agenda like every
other president we have.
And no one in Israel will,
agree to anything else because we don't commit
suicide. Except that's not true, and most people
in Israel don't agree with most of what
he's doing. But most of them do agree
with hating Gaza and Palestinians because of what
their Zionist government's done to them over the
years. But there's still a huge push in
that country that's not the majority, but a
big push to stop it for Palestinians and
they want to state solution. It does exist.
So the framing that nobody in Israel wants
that is flatly not true. The reality is
today, most of them want an end to
this in some way. Doesn't mean they want
Palestinians to be free or they want but
they do want this to stop for countless
other reasons.
He's lying, as always. And as always, the
US government puts him on a pedestal and
a platform and lets you scream that lie
across the world, which sets that narrative for
far too long.
We want life. We cherish life for ourselves,
for our neighbors. And I think we can
work out
a piece between us and the entire Middle
East
with president Trump's leadership.
And by working together,
I think we can establish a very, very
broad peace
that will include all our neighbors. It's just
so gross to me. Like, my personal opinion,
here's Trump just just you could just see
he I think he just desperately wants what
however you get that narrative to be accepted,
that that outcome. He doesn't care whether everyone
dies, he's pretending he saves. That's how I
think this is what I believe these people
think like.
He wants his legacy. He wants his long
term. He wants to be remembered as whatever
the narrative they etched in stone says regardless
of whether it's true. That's what he wants.
Read his books. Look at his past. The
guy does not care about things he claims
he cares about today, unless he changed, which
I'll hope for. But, again, track record, action,
outcome. That's what I care about. He has
repeatedly shown you even just since this previous
current administration
that he does not believe any of the
things he's putting out. He's literally sitting across
the table from the the
most this is a person that's committing genocide
in front of the entire world that most
Israelis don't like, that everyone at this table
know should be arrested on-site according to international
law. They don't care. But, yeah, let's let
him sit there and tell you about how
things should go in the future.
It's a grotesque cartoon right now.
When Pam Bondi was asked about all this,
Trump couldn't help but interrupt her and show
frustration
that anyone was concerned about his old friend
of fifteen years. One of the biggest ones
is whether he ever worked for a American
or foreign intelligence agency.
The former labor secretary who was, Miami US
attorney,
Alex Costa, he allegedly said that he did
work for intelligence agency. So So could you
resolve whether or not he did? And also,
could you say why there was a minute
missing from the jailhouse tape on the night
of seven? Yeah. Sure. If I Could I
just interrupt for a second?
Thank god.
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years. You're
asking
we have Texas. We have this. We have
all of the things we
and are people still talking about this guy,
this creep? Wow. That is unbelievable.
Do you wanna waste the time? And do
you feel like answering? I I don't mind
answering, but I mean, I can't believe you're
asking a question on Epstein at a time
like this where we're having some of the
greatest
success and and also tragedy
with what happened in Texas. It just seems,
like a desecration, but you go ahead. And
Pam Bondi suggested that the child porn they
have in evidence was Epstein's personal collection that
he downloaded from the Internet and nothing at
all to do with blackmail.
Sure. Sure. First, to back up on that,
in February, I did an interview on Fox,
and it's been getting a lot of attention
because I said
I was asked a question about the client
list, and my response was,
it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed,
meaning the file along with
the JFK, MLK files as well. Except for
the fact that you played into that in
every other conversation, in every other moment, and
clearly did insinuate that there was a list
as there was proof about people that you
I mean, this is the only people that
are pushing the lies she's selling now are
people that blindly support it. The ones we're
gonna list off every day. The Cat, Turds
and Johnson, the same people that will come
out and say, whatever she just said, that's
the thing today.
Despite the fact that anybody honest right now
is starting to go, I am very uncomfortable.
They told me this, now they're saying that.
They're not stupid.
The people out there thinking that they see,
they that's what they think of you. They
think you're either that meek that you'll follow
with whatever they say today despite you're being
smart enough to know that's not what was
said before or that you're gonna be blindly
following regardless of your integrity.
I know that's not what most of you
are out there, and that's why this is
fracturing.
That's what I meant by that.
Also, to the tens of thousands of video,
they turned out to be child porn downloaded
by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
Child porn is what they were. Never gonna
be released. Never gonna see the light of
day. Does that ring true with anybody?
Like, didn't she already say that they were
going through all I mean, look at her
past statements, guys.
That's why people aren't falling for this because
they're just clumsy.
Now, again, that could be incompetence or it
could be that something else is happening.
To him being an agent, I have no
knowledge about that. We can get back to
you on that. Great. We can get back
to you on that. Like, she's so bad
at this. The bottom line, guys, is very
clearly
Acosta, who was Trump's
in fact, that's what the article we just
read shows you that they sat down with
the Trump administration. He admitted he was told
to back off, didn't ask any questions, and
apparently, that was okay with the Trump administration.
Yeah. Come on board. As long as you
cover for Israel, it's all good. That's what's
going on right now in a lot of
ways or CIA as well, but they're covering
for this.
The she told you there was more to
this, and now they're backing away from it.
You can ask why. You should ask why.
Agreece reporting.
Now here
is another clip.
This is about the one the missing minute,
which is just clumsy. Again, the way that
she's conducting this, it just shows you that
she does not she doesn't have confidence. Oh,
and that well, I was gonna make the
other point about the the intelligence side of
it. You're gonna tell me, Pam Bondi, that
you have access to everything we do, all
the evidence, the entire file, and you have
no knowledge of what seemingly everybody else knows
about that Acosta was told about, that Trump
has commented on? You're telling me you have
no knowledge of that? Like, see, if she
was more seasoned at this, she would have
had a better answer. To say you have
no knowledge proves that you're lying.
Simple as that. But that's her trying to
that's that's the all or nothing mindset for
these people. She doesn't wanna worry. She doesn't
wanna Trump be mad at her. So, I
have nothing to say about anything ever until
you're told to say everything, and then it
becomes everything you know all the time.
You can't have both.
You can't you know, she's a liar like
they all are. Or rather, to be more
clear, Bondi
is a she's it's like, I think all
of them in the presence of Trump is
very meek. You do what you're told. They've
been proving that even if it's wrong, even
if it's counter to your integrity, if you
have that. They're clearly continuing to show that
they will march along with whatever Trump does.
So here,
Sal the Agris points out some Americans don't
have maps, so they can't find the missing
the missing minutes. He's making a joke about
an old clip that was shit circulating, but
I just think it's worth pointing out this
does feel similar. Clips that give off the
same energy.
And the minute missing from the video,
we released the video showing
definitively
the video was not conclusive,
but
the evidence
prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
Oh, was that? Not at all, though, because
literally nobody thought that. And the video, as
you told us, Bondi, which is the way
I'm this is what I keep showing you.
She told you this would put it to
bed, right? She said it'll be absolutely well,
they all did, but she stressed it, that
the video will be it'll prove to you.
Bongino said the same thing. Now, it comes
out. They go, Well, the video was inclusive.
But what we showed you before that was,
but it wasn't though because the video was
supposed to make it full.
They they know what's I mean, this, again,
is why I call it desperate. Because you
don't think they're smart enough to recognize that
they're being caught in a lie. They're just
hoping that the narrative carries it across.
Think about how wild that is. And what
was on that, there was a minute that
was off the counter. And what we learned
from bureau of prisons was every year, every,
night,
they redo that video. It's old from, like,
1999.
The system is what she means, by the
way. Every night, the video is reset,
and every night should have the same minute
missing. So we're looking for that video to
release that as well. Oh, you're looking for
it? Like, you wouldn't have a thousand possible
examples of any video? So if it happens
every night, I'm sure it takes a long
term investigation to find another night to show
us. So you're looking for that? The the
way she says that makes it sound like
she hasn't even proven that to herself yet.
Is it the narrative somebody spun for you?
Wouldn't surprise me that that's how flimsy this
is. But you realize that they put this
out without noting that. So either they didn't
know there was a missing minute or they
just pretended not or they hope you wouldn't
notice. Because, look, if they put it out
and there's a missing minute, the very first
thing you would do would be like, well,
they just heads up. There's a minute that's
missing. Here's why that makes sense.
They really didn't think people would notice, I
guess. We showed it for you. It's an
entire minute. Okay. Let's just even say that
she's accurate, that it's a it's a system
thing. Well, then that's exactly what we always
told you, that there would be an anomaly.
Right? How many times did we bring that
up? There's gonna be a missing moment or
a cut in the video where they're gonna
say, well, don't worry. And that's gonna be
where we go, well, that could have been
where it happened.
Exactly.
Whatever it could be, an Israeli agent coming
in, the CIA, somebody giving them instructions that
says, do this or we're gonna kill your
fam. Whatever.
Knowing that a minute is missing every night,
and that's it on Epstein.
I personally believe
that US Americans
are unable to do so
because,
some
people out there in our name You get
the point. This making, you know, a cheap
knock at the fact that she's a blonde
or stupid. The point is that it it
to me felt very clumsy. And the way
she's saying that doesn't make sense, so I
get the I get the reference.
Now
here
is what a lot of the cover is.
And this has been I mean, look, we've
been highlighting a lot of this across the
partisan field for a lot recently. But, wow,
is this one of the most embarrassing ones?
And I mean that legitimately. If you look
at look at what's happened and what's the
narrative's being spun and what everyone can and
even the majority of the conservative side of
the conversation that is really calling this out.
On the seventh,
Alex Jones says the Epstein Jail cell footage
missing a minute, a full minute.
This is not okay. Well, here's the funny.
It doesn't say is. It says this is
a setup to make the Trump administration look
guilty of a cover up, exclamation mark.
Statement.
Who edit a tape?
This is a setup to make the Trump
administration look guilty?
Are you kidding me? Like, so this so
you're telling me that Bondi got the tape.
Bondi put the tape out. You got you
clearly looked at it you're supposed to before,
so you're the one that put it out.
And you're telling us that now the Trump
administration was set up by them getting a
tape they put out?
I mean, this is the most desperate deflection
I've seen from him. It's it's embarrassing,
but it is everywhere.
The stones and the they're all stepping up
to try to gaslight you into thinking that
everything that's happening is the right direction.
Alex or David Icke says, Trump is in
power at the time or was in power
at the time. Right, Alex?
And is in power now, so I have
no idea who edited the tape.
Just crazy.
Tim Cass came out with this show saying
deep state plot for regime change against Trump
exposed. Democrats demand violence. Then the the whole
point is they're talking about the Epstein overlap.
Here, on the ninth, he says, exclusive high
level sources confirm.
Confirm.
Covert war inside The US, Israeli, and other
Western intelligence agencies
is behind the Epstein case whitewash.
Right? So it's the black hats fighting the
white hats as always. Right? Plus, Trump is
using blackmail to control the deep state
rather than expose high profile individuals. Yes. Not
a joke. They're actually so here's what's crazy
about this. You he I've he's playing this
at the same time, both what you on
one side of it, is Trump being tricked
by the tape, or is he being manipulated?
Or in the same time, is he using
the tape to blackmail the deep state? Sort
of very Israeli of you,
Dallas Jones. Give us both narratives, and we
can pick which one we like the most.
It's like a choose your adventure book.
How it's just how embarrassing. And I said,
is that the same high level source who
confirmed to you that the Ukraine war had
ended or that Netanyahu and Trump had broken
ties?
Just double checking.
Here he says, Alex Jones claim or a
a shot of Ezra says, Alex Jones claims
the Trump administration holds explosive blackmail material on
key deep state figures, to him which means
Democrats, of course, and has struck a secret
deal to keep it quiet? Okay. So you're
now reporting
watch the video. That it's okay. Or, I
mean, he'll always play it off like it's
not okay and that we need to fight
this, but then blindly support it every day.
That Trump is allowing pedophiles to go free
because it's gonna work out in the long
run. Trust the plan. Right? Well, let it's
sort of like letting MS 13 go because
it'll work out in the long run to
get rid of all the people crossing the
street illegally. They're aliens
with visas.
And has struck a secret deal, wait, with
pedophiles. Okay. According to Jones, the argument allows
Trump to pursue his America first agenda without
interference.
Of course. But if the deep state breaks
the deal, Trump can unleash the files on
him. The files that they just screamed at
you aren't even real and don't exist. But
then they'll go, I tricked you. It was
all a 40 chess move, and now we
can put him in jail after we let
them rape kids in the meantime, though. But
now it's done.
Does anybody actually believe this? Clearly, George Galloway
doesn't. Perfectly absurd.
At the very least, even if you believe
it's possible
well, that's what I said right here.
This is what it looks like to not
let the facts get in the way of
your self serving narrative, or in this case,
the utter lack of evidence.
Look. There's no what he's saying is a
it's
it's whole cloth. You're grabbing at a hypothetical
narrative with nothing to back it up other
than secret sources do seem to mislead you
all the time, if they're even there.
This one, David Icke, same point. High level
sources confirm
that he's using the black you know, blackmail.
Al David Icke says, it's hysterical watching the
influencer members of the Trump cult disappearing
up to their own
backsides as they come back to daddy as
Trump and seek to recover from the fleeting
realization that daddy has been a fraud all
along.
There were a few terrors to start with
as realization gone,
but cult members are so programmed
and personally dependent on their Joan Jim Jones
that they must quaff the Kool Aid and
find a way to explain
why their daddy is such a blatant liar
and con man. I don't realize Trump called
himself daddy. Daddy's home was the whole thing,
which is also a Palantir thing, by the
way. But it says, thus, we have everyone
around the cult leader blamed. Bondi, Patel, Bonjino,
which is such a strange thing. All of
them are trying to go, like, Bondi is
the one. Like, somehow Trump is completely like,
this is the point we all laugh about.
So easy. They're simultaneously completely out of the
know all the time, so it's not his
fault, but same time as secretly controlling everything
when it works for him. You know, it's
just it's just lazy thinking. But it goes,
we have everyone around him blamed, but never
their god king, and here is the most
ludicrous take of all from Alex Jones. If
Trump does go down, then so does he
if if Trump does go down, then so
does he, and desperation doesn't begin to describe
it. Trump is covering up the Epstein files
and lying to his base because, wait for
it, he's blackmailing the deep state. Now that
is truly desperate. I can I can do
no more than quote the great Bill Hicks,
who we just played for you, has a
you know, more than once screamed about how
Alex Jones was basically pretending to be him
and lying about him, trying to emulate him
and was a dishonest person?
He says, quote, go back to bed, America.
Your government has figured out how it all
transpired.
Go back to bed, America. Your government is
in control again. Here you go, America. You
are free to do as you will to
do as we tell you. You are free
to do as we tell you. Alex Jones
has worked it out. Phew. That was close.
He almost had to face reality.
Sad.
Now here's an interesting development.
This is, I'm actually,
Chris Skye.
Has a he's a, like, a very long
term supporter of Alex Jones.
He's calling him out. Now I believe there's
some cussing, so prepare yourself if you got
kids' earmuffs, but it's worth hearing what he's
saying.
How fucking stupid are MAGA?
I just heard Alex Jones right now. Alex
Jones, a man I used to respect since
I was 14 years old and recently
actually, not that recently, for a few years,
I was questioning his authenticity.
But today, he just lost me forever, and
I'm gonna call Alex Jones as a lying,
cock sucking piece of shit right now. He
literally just made a video
where
they are now saying this is the new
MAGA coping mechanism
that Trump is not releasing the Epstein files
because
he's using it to
control the deep state state and reverse blackmail
them.
Totally.
Totally. That's why he's Israel's bitch
completely
and doing everything that they want because he's
secretly now
blackmailing
the deep state with the Epstein files. That's
gonna be the new Trump narrative for them
to trust the plan that Trump is now
playing
75
d chess
with the Mossad, and Trump all by himself
is really pulling the strings against the Mossad
and everybody else. Alex Jones, you're so fucking
full of shit, and I am sorry that
I ever went on your show and gave
you everybody the appearance of your legitimacy.
This is Chris Sky signing off. Fuck you,
Alex Jones.
Now sorry for the cussing. He's got a
very large following. And I and my point
is showing that is that this is a
person who has been pretty hardcore supporting of
of of Jones for a long time.
So I think right now, there's probably a
lot of people who have aligned themselves with
this platform who are hopefully starting to reflect
on the kind of people they're working with
because it's, you know, it's important. There's a
lot of people out there. I'd like to
believe T Lab is one of them that
acts in the interest of integrity, of truth,
of honesty
to a fault, to our detriment, in fact,
in a lot of ways. Side note, sort
of like BitChute acts in it to its
to its detriment for the right reasons. Right?
It's fighting for free speech even as it's
used against them. That's what it looks like
to have integrity, guys. That's the point. And
so recognize the kind of people out there
who demonstrate the opposite.
Call it out. Now here are some overlaps
in regard to Trump and his team and
so on, and this is Kash Patel. Here's
what he was saying in 2023.
They get into the the more of the
Epstein overlap in regard to what they're saying.
I just find it interesting, him and Trump,
couple good examples that have been circulating.
Has Jeffrey Epstein's
Black book? Black book. FBI.
But who?
That is that that I mean, there's That's
under direct
control of the director of the FBI.
Just like the manifesto
from the Nash Nashville school shooting of the
Catholic schools. Yeah. We still haven't seen that.
Right?
It's not the Nashville police or PD saying
we don't want this out. The FBI air
mailed into that operation and said, this is
not getting out.
Because they do that because they this is
another government gangster operation.
I mean, look, is it just my opinion?
But just the the impression that I get
from these people, they feel like juniors.
Right? They feel like they are the second
string in so many ways, the way they
talk, the way they move, they're juvenile, they're
childish, they're uninformed,
or they're tapping into what they think you
want to hear. My point in saying all
that is that now he gets into power
and he has entirely different tune. Not just
that he looked you know, now has access
and realized he was wrong, but he's selling
you on something here that he claims he
knows that now suddenly changes. So either he
was lying here
or he's lying now. That's the real point.
My point in showing you all this is
that that's what people who do that's what
people do who do not think.
What's the right term for it? Think ahead
is what I'm gonna say, but there's a
term for that. You know? Think three dimensionally.
The point is that clearly,
people can consider what saying ma what they're
saying now, how it might affect them in
the future. How often have I said that?
That if you lie about everything,
eventually, you're gonna turn and step on a
previous lie to sell a new one. And
I think that's what we're recognizing. People that
are just not you know, they're not thinking
long term.
All these local law enforcement communities get funding
from the DOJ and FBI for local programs.
And If you don't cooperate, you're not getting
your million dollars for this, and you're not
getting it. And that's a lot of money
to these local districts.
That's how they play the game.
That's why you don't have a black book.
But the black book is not just sitting
I mean, that's
that's that's Hoover
power times 10.
And and to me, that's a thing I
think president Trump should run on. On day
one Ah. Roll out the black book. Right?
And there you go. Right? So the point
is that's the narrative anyway. Right? And so
clearly what's funny is just as a collective
just understanding,
everyone here is knows there's a list and
they know they have, and that's control.
Funny how they sing a different tune now.
Even the point like like Glenn Beck and
the rest. So suddenly, now they say otherwise,
and now you know otherwise.
Right? What level do we get any evidence
to back these things up?
And not just that. On day one, roll
out all of the text message communications we
we were told were deleted. On day one,
play the rest of the video of the
pipe bomber. On day you know, he need
one of the reforms I talk about in
government gangsters is you need a central node
to be continuously
declassifying.
There's another thing they do. They overclassify
every and I'm telling you, as a former
number two in the IC, they over classify
50% of the stuff there to protect
the deep state. Oh, no. You can't see
that. Nothing to see here. Gina was a
master at it, of doing it. And
we still haven't seen half of the Russiagate
report that we wrote.
Still under lock and key.
On how
the ICA was originally constructed. We went we
put 10,000
against John Brennan's team that did it. And
we found out why they came up with
their bogus conclusion.
But we couldn't sell it to the world
because we couldn't talk about it, and the
government gangsters came in and buried it. All
of these things, there needs to be a
continuing central That's what they're doing.
Funny how that works.
Partisan revolving door.
But as Michael Tracy says, Cash Patel 2023,
Epstein's black book is under the direct control
of the director of FBI. So did Patel
succumb to the deep state conspiracy once in
power, or was he always just throwing red
meat at the dullards? That's kinda what I
was getting at. It's like just throwing you
what you wanna hear. Occam's razor says the
latter. Here's what he says. Alright. This is
the,
oh, sorry. The right
that's
this is the point. So here's what he
says today. The conspiracy theories just aren't true.
Never have been.
It's an honor to serve the president of
The United States, and I'll continue to do
so for as long as he calls me.
Okay. So as I said, can you care
to explain the certainty in the blow in
the video below?
If it if it they aren't if the
conspiracy theories aren't true and never were, so
were were you spinning conspiracy theories right here,
Cash Patel?
You just got to understand, like, this is
that statement is very different than what he's
doing right there. So which one do you
believe?
Either way, it shows you dishonesty, doesn't it?
Here's same point with Donald Trump. Trump before
the election, Trump after the election.
Bill Clinton. Nice guy.
I got a lot of problems coming up
in my opinion with the famous island
with Jeffrey Epstein.
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years, that
island. And don't forget, when the island and
Epstein got brought up in the earlier parts
of this, he's like, who's that? Who are
who Epstein? You know, like, clearly, he knew
who he was. So explain why he had
to lie like that when brought it up
before, and now acting like it's not important.
This guy's been talked about for years. That
island was, really a cesspool. There's no question
about it. Just ask prince Andrew. I mean,
I can't believe you're asking a question on
a Epstein at a time like this where
we're having some of the greatest
success and and also tragedy
with what happened in Texas. It just seems,
like a desecration.
The greatest tragedy tra tragedy.
Excuse me. Right. So we're gonna pretend that
you know, and it was sad. People died.
Right? It wasn't it wasn't no it wasn't
a small thing. But are we gonna pretend
like the Texas issue was a major there
in the context of what's going on in
the world, that's not some major massive you
know, it's it's a sad thing that people
children died, and it's and it's serious weather.
But think about what he's framing it as.
That you're you're trying to suggest that the
Texas reporting is more important than this earth
shattering massive global blackmail network that's run through
Israel and our country?
I mean, that that's why everyone was, like,
just almost shaken by that. People who want
to believe in him were very shaken. That
doesn't make any sense with anything we were
told. And as people pointed out rightly so,
pretty defensive.
So here is another clip. Orwell points out
that he was this was before the election.
Same kind of thing. Very different than what
we're hearing now with Tucker, of course.
But, yeah, the the closer you look into
it I mean, the attorney general of The
United States, your attorney general clearly lied about
the Epstein
death. Yeah. He was Why? He was,
certainly, it wasn't well done. They'd had no
cameras. They had no Yeah.
Your person. Like, think about what he's saying
right there. He's very clearly saying your guy
lied. There's no way you can proceed. The
way even Trump responds is like somehow he's
aloof. He's like beyond it all. It wasn't
me. It was Acosta. I had nothing to
do with it. It's just insane that we
act like that makes sense. And, of course,
if you have Biden, it doesn't matter whether
he's even in the room. It's all his
fault because he's president. Well, guess what? I
agree with that. Same thing here, though. Apply
the logic equally. The president is the person
allegedly in power and is responsible for everything,
whether they're even aware of what's happening.
Yes. On top of that, you know he
was aware. He was involved in that conversation,
Acosta and the rest. It's all very clear.
So remember, again, he asked,
your guy lied. And listen to how he
responded.
Death Yeah. Lied about attorney general clearly lied
about the attorney general of The United States.
Your attorney general, you really lied about the
Epstein
death. Yeah. He was Why? He was,
certainly, it wasn't well done. They'd had no
cameras. They had no anything. Everybody was sleeping.
And, you know, there the a case could
be made. Look. I'm not gonna get involved
in it, but I can tell you a
case could be made either way, but,
it certainly wasn't the
most well run place. So does that seem
like genuine journalism to you? It's a softball
dynamic like we see all the time with
these people.
Here
is the one you pretty much saw, but
let's you know, we we we played it
already. I mean, it's the same clip.
Are you talking about Epstein? This guy has
been talking about for years. Are people still
talking about that creep? I can't believe you're
asking about Epstein.
That's just insane. And I said and this
is the important part to think about. I
I responded that saying, it's your base asking
that question, Donald Trump. It's majority of the
people asking that question are the people that
support you.
And I simply said, once again, showing the
reality of the two party illusion and the
shrieking sycophants who now parrot this statement despite
moments ago telling you Trump would expose it
all and it was paramount
are showing us the reality of team sport
politics.
And here they are. As Adam rightly points
out, I mean, it went around, guys, and
it's still happening. People going, honestly, I'm just
sick of talking about the Epstein list even
though that account thirty seconds ago was saying,
this is gonna bring down the Democrats, and
I can't wait. You're all scared. Little TikToks.
Liberals are shaking right now.
And so I'm so sick of hearing about
the Epstein files. I mean, it's everywhere. Just
endless amounts. Instruction Barbie. I'm not saying we
need to move on, but I wanna see
accountability of everything. But what I'm saying is
we need to move past this. Yeah. Exactly.
The The conservative movement, Charlie Kirk says, needs
to focus more time, energy, and focus on
how Islam is rapidly taking over the West.
Thanks, Israel.
That's what's happening. Here are some specific examples.
The reckoning. Trump this is twenty twenty five
February. Trump knows the Epstein issue isn't going
to just go away.
July 8. He literally just told you to
get over it. I'm sorry if that triggers
you. You now have two choices. Accept the
answers you're getting or assume Trump is now
engaged in a conspiracy. But see, they already
know the answer is, well, that's that's definitely
not what we're ever gonna consider regardless of
the evidence, so get over it.
That's what he's so that's what he's telling
you. Just accept what the government just told
you, you stupid.
Either way, this is the end of the
Epstein conversation.
Can you imagine? So if if Biden came
out and said it's over, there's nothing there,
what do you think this guy would have
said?
Trump, no. That's not gonna go away. These
people deserve ridicule. Like, that is sad,
and it's everywhere.
Kathy Oltrumaga says, Democrats will get equal time
when Epstein was released. Reserve your disgust and
buckle up, sweetie. 2024.
2025. Seriously, who gives an f about these
files?
All perfectly timed right after Trump said, let's
move on.
This one,
02/26/2025.
Brendan Dilley says the Epstein list is the
ultimate Trump card.
2025.
I hope this means that we can stop
talking about this stupid s h I t.
How embarrassing. Jason Basler kind of redid that
old meme. This one shows Trump and Vance
and Musk and, you know, Biden and Kamala
and and Obama, you know, and,
I'm so they're blanking on his name.
That's crazy. You know? And the other democrat
in the middle there, he says, then and
they're all laughing and drinking beer together. And
he says, then we told them that the
Epstein that Epstein killed himself and had no
clients and gaslit them for continuing to talk
about it.
Exactly.
Hell,
Dershowitz is not the one over there, but
I've just want the name that I was
gonna say, and I'm blanking on the name
in the other picture. But the point is,
here's Dershowitz.
Mint Press News. I know the names of
the individuals. I know that why they're being
suppressed, and I know who's suppressing them.
God, you love you gotta love that. My
I kept my underwear on Dershowitz wants you
to believe that he secretly knows because he
defended them, he says.
Yet somehow
doesn't want that information to come out and
will never say anything. So you have the
my point is this is them trying to
tell you, I think he knows it's never
gonna come out. So what he's doing is
making it sound like he secretly knows and
wink wink it's all Democrats is what they're
trying to do.
That's what I think anyway.
Or rather not only Democrats in this context,
but specifically only enemies of Israel, but which
is, you know, the way the I said
Democrat from the way that, it's being framed
in the partisan field. But in a general
sense, the way I believe it's actually in
effect is about anybody criticizing Israel.
Trump says Epstein files could destroy people.
See, now this is this is from the
tenth. So the point is we're starting to
get to this point to where it's going,
okay. Well, that they're not buying that. Right?
They're still talking about it. So let's give
them something to buy onto. Well, it's gonna
it's gonna destroy the country, though. We don't
you're Ameri you don't want that Americans, do
you?
You really think people are gonna buy that,
guys? Come on. The bottom line is it
could destroy innocent people, could destroy the country,
and then that overtook the conversation. Here comes
Kirk dutifully jumping in. Would you support relacing
the Epstein files even if it could send
Republicans to print? Don't even finish the sentence.
Yes. Obviously. Anybody with integrity or a brain
or, you know, anybody that actually cares about
what this is about.
You really believe their answer is gonna be
no. No. Never mind. Keep pedophiles as long
as it go you know, it unless it
only goes up to Democrats.
It just shows you how childishly insane this
is. Yes or no? And you realize, look.
Look.
Most people are saying, yes. Go after it
no matter what. But he want the point
is this is supposed to be a push
to go. Maybe we should let it go
because, you know, Republicans.
Insane.
Here's Bennie Johnson with rove
Roseanne
because, you know, she's super intelligent and super
informed or not at all and parrots whatever
people like him say. But Roseanne Barr says
that if real prosecutions happened over the Diddy
and Epstein connections, you know, the Diddy part
that he just he interviewed Dershowitz as well
and said a good win for Diddy, fighting
against the bad guys. Him and him and,
what's his name? That other disgusting
creep
that Milk Bar TV is calling. Why can't
I think of names today?
The other one. The the, you know, the
the Tate brothers. You know, the these people
are horrified, like, objectively proven,
disgusting people, and they're acting like they're fighting
all these things in other parts of the
world while supporting the most visible and clear
examples of what they claim they're fighting. And
so my point is,
if real prosecutions happen over Diddy and Epstein,
it would trigger a collapse that exposes everything?
Well, yeah. So most everyone's going good. Isn't
that what we're all calling for? But you
see, that's not what they're getting at.
Says, quote, it goes to the royals of
the world, not just Hollywood. It's the devil's
world, and they wanna destroy us. Go got
to go.
You see the sentiment, though, begins to build
into, well, it's gonna bring down the government.
It's gonna bring down good things, and so
maybe we have to play this differently.
Here, TrueStreet Media. And this is where this
is the leading report, one of these other
platforms I don't like. Trump said the Epstein
files could destroy innocent people.
This person says conservative alternative. It would literally
destabilize the world. Two thirds of congress and
a large portion of the world's most powerful
people would be imprisoned, which basically means society
would at least partially collapse.
But despite that last statement,
who wouldn't want that?
Who wouldn't want people who are guilty to
be arrested
regardless of the consequences? Well, you know what's
funny? Those conservatives would have told you that,
except now you're getting the sentiment building through
the conversation where maybe we shouldn't because it's
not working out how we want it. As
Amity says, your terms are acceptable.
I agree.
True Stream Media says, so the argument is
we have no choice but to live in
a corrupt world run by corrupt people because
if the corrupt people were put in prison
for their corruption, their corrupt world would fall
apart?
Have I got that right? Because if so,
do you hear how stupid that sounds?
Here is a concerned citizen.
If they release the Epstein list, it would
literally crash the world's economy. Given the number
of high profile people involved, would it be
worth it?
Trying to act like we're just framing a
thoughtful thing. No. You're trying to set tones
right now about why maybe we should back
away from this because it's gonna hurt our
agenda.
God. And I said, am I the only
one near laughing out loud at how many
on this platform, either of their own accord
or because someone got them to do it,
are posting this elitist serving blind assumption below
after spewing the last year telling us, spending
last year telling us that Trump releasing the
list was an absolute?
And the answer to this question, yes. Yes.
It would. Yes. It would be worth it.
Do it right now.
My god. Now this is one that I
just this is this you know, I've talked
I this guy has a special place in
my heart for for disdain after he
hosted, in the quotes, that really disgustingly ridiculous
debate, if you can call it that, between
Laura Loomer and and,
my gosh.
That is so weird. I don't know why
I'm blanking on names today. Dave Smith. There
it is. My point is this guy here,
not this guy you're looking at, this guy
here from the the little sidekick from Valuetainment.
I mean, it's just it's embarrassing to me
to watch this person. You know, that debate
was bad. It wasn't a debate. By the
way, Dow Dave Smith just
completely destroyed her, which is just objectively obvious.
One person was printing facts. The other person
was deflecting all the time. But the guy
just didn't know how to do a bait.
He was constantly letting her talk over everybody
and does not know what he's talking about
in my opinion. But that's the whole side.
This is him
explaining to you while people are overinvesting in
the Epstein list, trying to get you to
feel like it's just not important and everyone's
overreacting.
Does it sorta sound like Trump and Israel?
It should. That's where it's coming from in
my opinion.
I gotta get the flight logs, bro. I
gotta know. And I'm not saying that that
that's how you operate, but I think there's
a lot of losers
and brokies that are obsessed with stuff like
this. These are the same people that instead
of going home and working out and building
a business and, doing things with their life,
they're Netflix and chilling, or they're just doomscrolling.
What a really stupid connect so you're tell
first of all, like, that's even good versus
bad. But the idea that because people care
about whether our government involved pedophilia sex sexual
black people networks and Israel involvement in that,
whether that gets dealt with or not is
somehow conflated with you not being, you know,
being lazy and having no ambition and drive.
I mean, it's just
I don't this to me feels very clumsy
and about just trying to conflate this with
anything else that makes like, the things they
talk about. Right? The being a man and
and get you know, working and, you know,
whatever the the kind of sentiments they're putting
out about who you should be in the
world.
You couldn't have patched together a better argument
for why this doesn't make sense. In the
way it starts with,
it's like it it's it's childish to me.
Pulling all day. That's good. And there's so
many people that I think obsessed with things
that they have no I I control. I
get it. But I I get where you're
coming from. But And then, of course, I'm
not really familiar with this guy, but the
person that they bring on to make the
argument and contrast,
I just it doesn't seem to really do
a good job. Let's put it that way.
Feels very frantic and and not really informed.
I mean, I I mean, I don't know.
I don't know. I'm not gonna be wrong.
But to me, this is how it gets
set up to where this is something like,
there's a 100 of the people I think
could have well, better articulate at this point.
That guy that's drinking Mountain Dew in his
trailer and sitting there, who's American patriot that
pays his taxes and has kids and a
family at him.
He wants to know if the government that
he's
living under
is controlled
by foreign countries because they have tapes of
them
raping fucking underage kids.
Yeah. We get for in the general sentiment,
yes. Obviously. Right? That's the point. So I
agree with where he's coming from that he's
shocked that the other guy thinks that this
isn't important. Obviously, Americans wanna know what's going
on. This is important
in every possible sense of the word. Well,
all I'm only saying is that there's a
there's a a better way this could the
argument could have been constructed. And I tend
to think that's how this is kind of
set up. But either way, it's about the
other guy that's made poor. Adam, it's not
a shiny I wouldn't little thing. No, Adam.
I don't think It's not a shiny little
thing in the Everything you were right stupid.
Everything you were right. Everything you said after
it. Other than the word
controlled.
Of course. Of course. Because you can't clearly
highlight how Israel is blatantly controlling our government
policy or people in our government or the
outcome of their I mean, everything we're talking
about. It is the story of the day,
and it's very obvious what that means. And
people like this are the best they can
do. You're gonna roll out this guy to
make us think we're wrong. Not gonna work.
Our control The intelligence community Adam. I don't
know anything about this. Adam. They Oh, good.
You didn't know anything about it, but go
ahead. Okay. You didn't hear the c And
the CIA guy from yesterday. Adam, think about
this, Adam.
If you are comfortable with
Mossad, which is Israel, or Russia, or anybody,
their their their blackmail ring, their operation, think
about this, Adam. Would you be comfortable as
a country going, you know what? Epstein's our
guy. We own him. Lex West, all this
money is a billionaire. Let's wire everything. Bring
everybody there to have sex with underage kids
because it's an island and whatever, and we're
gonna use that to get what we want.
CIA, Mossad, anybody.
How
disgusting and evil if you really think about
that, step back from who it is. I
don't give a shit who it is, Adam.
If that is your operation See, there's not
really any tangible things to take for me.
He's just saying, if there's rape and sexual
things there, who how crazy is that? It's
just it's not a well constructed argument. Like,
there there's things we could lay out that
are verifiable facts.
And then, yes, the sentiment he's making is
still valid at the larger point that it
does matter because clearly it's insane.
But the idea is that you can prove
these things about what's been going on well
beyond Epstein, well beyond Israel as a matter
of policy. But the real point about what
it was used and how it's in the
infiltration of the government entities.
Like, okay. People like Dennis Hastert, we've talked
about. Somebody at the highest levels of power.
But there's plenty of other examples of this.
And there it's not just sexual,
like, abuse or,
like, harassment.
Right? We're talking about the kind of stuff
that they get caught doing that nobody ever
knows about, that then gets held over them
in regard to what they vote on that
day.
The evidence around that kind of infiltration through
just Epstein is the real point. And the
evidence of how Epstein's connected with intelligence through
Israel, through through the CIA, and how that
person connects back with all the different things
we've talked about with eugenics,
the future of the technological advancement, him seeding
the world. The the overall point, though, is
that this is something that is not just
about a
theory,
which is how these people want it. Like,
the the first guy, Adam, I think, said
his name was,
acting like we're being irrational
for wanting the information.
I think this is working from a very
clear
political you know,
whether it's from this country's political drive
that I do believe Israel is creating or
whether it is directly from Israel. That's what
I think is driving this conversation.
Completely my opinion. Holy shit. You are one
of the most evil, disgusting
unit operation, period. And for those little people,
Adam, the ones that you think are stupid
that are sitting there, I don't they don't
just want the flight logs. They want everybody
that's involved to fucking go down, period.
Accountability. It's simple. To me, it's just a
whole lot of noise, and there's not a
lot of signal. Okay. So you mean the
fact that there was peep that, you know,
there's not enough to know that there are
women that were raped and abused and sex
trafficked
that have testified to the evidence there. The
our government tells us it's real.
All that aside, but there's just noise? Like,
so here's what's crazy to me. The evidence
that we have that the government acknowledges, right,
which that's a fraction of it, is enough
for them and the entirety of the mainstream
media to acknowledge this is a sexual blackmail
pedophile network. That's what they'll tell
you. And yet you're okay stopping before anybody
is held accountable for that? That's all noise
to you to not see any actual accountability
for the thing they've all admitted is happening
or has happened? I mean, just think about
how insane that is,
especially since the reality is whether Epstein killed
you know, the reality of what happened to
him is he's one part
of a larger dynamic. That's the actual point.
You don't have a network when it's one
guy,
but he's okay acting like it's all a
bunch of noise.
A whole lot of noise, and there's not
a lot of signal.
It's like, alright. Do you know what I
mean? What is that? What is that supposed
to be about?
That's what you're doing. I mean, there's tons
of people that have been investigating this long
term. People, by the way, that you've had
on Whitney Webb has been on the show.
And this is how you respond to the
reality of these allegations, the well documented long
term evidence of what they've been doing and
who they're involved with. Can we stay focused
on the fact that, the Wuhan lab that
was in Wuhan where there was a lab
leak and basically took over the world? Let
me oh, okay. So now we're just back
to square one taking it face value, the
White House press release. These people are not
real, in my opinion. Whether they are meaning
what they're saying or not, these are the
stand up token dynamics. The if you're gonna
literally just pair it what the Trump administration
said about the by the way, the same
topic that people like you were shouting down
when this first started is the consideration of
whether or not that was the reality was
discussed by people like us.
The reality of the evidence now has
just light years away from what he's talking
about.
But that's where they said, this is my
point in the past. They're pointing back
to something they want you to focus in
on. Ignore what's happening in front of you.
Look back at the thing they now want
you to look at.
It's how you But that is way more
important. I post a sentence. Posted.
You caught it. Which topic is most important
to you? To to our audience,
Epstein's and Mossad CIA ties is number one.
More than COVID.
I gotta tell you, there's some losers out.
Oh my god. Right. Your own audience he's
talking to. There's some losers out there. How
dare you talk about what you care about
most? Doesn't that seem a little desperate, guys?
Does to me.
Here, this one's, longer, but this is, I
won't play it. I'll play it, but it's,
high impact flicks.
Brian from high Brian Young, high impact flicks.
He says these goofballs knew Trump was owned,
were warned by us and plenty of others
against voting for the lesser of two evils,
endorsed the current administration in front of their
massive audiences anyway, and are now acting shocked
that their guy is aiding and abetting child
predators and covering up for a petal ring.
But somehow, it's only Bondi, Patel, Bongino who
should step down.
Yep. This is, with the quartering talking with
Luke Rudowski.
We are change, and they're just doing the
same old tap dance.
Can't be Trump's fault. Right?
Cat Turd says, I've never seen so many
bots in my replies as I've seen today.
It's on the eighth. Trying to sow division
at the same point I make every time.
Yeah. There's certainly probably that happening too. But
the point is you don't
need bots to drive this division. These people
are just simply not morons. They're not stupid
and blind and following like the they see
it. They call it out. The problem is
that you people like this are so invested
in the blind support that once that starts
to fade, will they have to make it
into be something else?
It must be some division Democrat tactic. Well,
probably involved too, because that's always going on.
But clearly, people in the conservative movement, Republicans
and Red Baga and Maha, they're
I think most of them were honest because
they wanted the good things that you guys
played them into thinking were happening. Now they're
calling it out. Thank God.
He says, I know the people who regularly
reply to me, I do this all day
every day. Yeah. We know that. Almost everyone's
saying negative stuff in my replies today. I've
never seen before.
Okay.
The point is people are starting to see
through it, man.
Jack Posobek does the same thing. Most of
what I'm seeing in my replies are this
is a different post, same point, though. Most
of what I'm seeing are new accounts I've
never seen before. Under a 100 followers.
Okay.
Is it it's just that doesn't prove anything.
Plenty of people come on this platform new.
Maybe there could be bots. If they are,
they're most likely working for Israel through CHEQ
as Sensor Band pointed out, but, you know,
who cares about that? Jack says, I noticed
I I actually noticed the same thing yesterday
in my replies.
Typical people all coming out trying to to
downplay what's really being seen. He goes, and
it was all accounts who had no previous
interaction with me.
AI MAGA network or something. And I said,
no. They're just not complete morons and who
will act against their own interest for the
team. We all see you.
So
last few points on this little segments here.
Bondi, as we pointed out, seems to be
the focal point.
And this is this is, you know, what
we get from the breakdown, which is actually
pretty funny. So, basically, what we get
is
Megyn Kelly
and Kirk
at the same Turning Point USA discussion, and
she's saying, I blame Pam Bondi. She's never
missed an opportunity to go on TV and
dangle sweet nothings. And Nick's orders like, holy
crap. Look at them going after her. They're
just they're such outrage machines. It's so funny
to me. They're all such children. The point
though is that it's someone gave the talking
point. Or at the very least, Meghan put
this out and everyone picked it up on
it or somebody put out the talking point.
Bondi's the one. We can't blame Trump because
that's our entire that's that's everything we built.
We have to blame Bondi, which again, as
I pointed out over here,
what really quickly is the point is that
this is stated. Right? And then what's funny
is that later,
Jones comes out and goes breaking exclusive and
says the same thing that everybody already picked
up from what she said earlier. But it's
a it's a breaking solo exclusive that everyone's
already been talking about. The point is that
Bondi's gonna be the one. And so based
on that sentiment they were all floating, I
simply said, so apparently, Bondi is the one
slated to be thrown under the bus for
the Epstein cover up that everyone but partisan
saw coming.
Who needs enemies when you have allies like
Donald Trump? Let's not forget, it's not unique
to left or right. It's our government. But
realize how often that happens. Trump's very is
more common with him, I would argue. Whether
it's Bill Barr or, you know, you're the
ally until you're the enemy. Right? Ask Elon
Musk.
Or that's part of the game and they're
coordinating. I don't know. But it's just sad.
And this is the meme. The Epstein client
was on my desk.
Next next to me, what desk?
Yank. You're out of there.
I mean, I I I don't think it's
happened yet, but clearly, this is the building
sentiment. Now Trump spoke up about this saying
that's not okay. We'll get to in a
second. Here's Charlie Kirk getting his marching orders.
I still trust Dan Bongino. What about you?
God, it's just embarrassing. Like, who what kind
of adult? You know, especially with politicians,
you trust him?
I mean, that's infantile, guys. And this guy
is not someone who you should trust. Just
look at what he says and how he's
contradicting himself. And clearly, they're all lying to
you right now about all of this, and
he wants you to ignore that.
Again, Jones says, Tom Bonny to take the
blame for the Epstein case. Plus, FBI director,
Bongino, will resign soon,
but Patel will stay on. Now maybe. Now,
again, these are things that have already been
floated out. It's not like some breaking inside
thing has already been posted. I'll show it
to you. The point though is that when
you you could point back and if it
does happen and say, I renew it.
But half the time, it doesn't happen. That's
how you play this game and all your
followers will scream whatever you say tomorrow. The
point is that clearly, it is possible. And
if it does happen,
it shows you none of this is going
in the direction that he and many others
told you it would.
Gunther Eagleman.
Here, but this is the one I was
gonna point to. Hold on.
Cash Patel wants Pam Bondi out and might
quit if Dan Bongino leaves. You see? It's
not really some secret intel. It's publicly put
out there. There's also frustration over the documents
Bondi hasn't released, blah blah blah. Okay.
The point is that maybe that'll happen.
Wait. Trump's saying, I don't think it will,
but we'll come back to that. Gunther Eagleman,
another one of these million follower accounts. He
says, if the Epstein files are not released,
there will be zero trust in our justice
system.
I said, so are you saying that if
they are never released that you'll no longer
blindly trust Donald Trump,
or are you still pretending that he is
not there right now?
You know how this goes.
Clearly,
they're trying to, you know, sidestep Trump. He
here he's all day has been doing this
all the last couple days. He says, by
not releasing Epstein files, Pam Bondi is protecting
pedophiles.
She must go. Right. Because Bondi is the
only one making this decision. Are we like,
isn't it funny how you all told us
that Trump could do anything he wants anytime?
Because mandate.
Who cares about laws and constitution, but now
suddenly he's bound by whatever Bondi does?
I simply said, you misspelled Donald Trump.
Here he goes, what kind of attorney general
lies to protect child rapists?
I can't say you misspelled Donald Trump. Like,
it just seems like such a childish sidestep.
These guys know what they're doing.
In in at least this at least right
now. Pam Bondi lost the trust of all
Americans. She must go. You see how they're
building they're clearly just screaming this into every
they're trying to force this in to save
Trump, it seems. Here's what Trump came out
and said.
This is I think it was today.
Yeah. It's
today. What's going on with my boys and,
in some cases, gals? They're all going after
attorney general Pam Bondi, who is doing a
fantastic job. Uh-oh.
Is is Eagle Guntherman counter signaling the leader?
How dare you?
He says we're we're on one team, MAGA,
and I don't like what's happening. We have
a perfect administration.
Really?
Just keep saying that Trump keeps screaming the
narrative. Maybe they'll follow suit. The talk of
the world and selfish people are happening or,
talk or or trying to hurt it all
by a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.
Wow. For years, it's Epstein over and over
again.
Why are we giving publicity to files written
by Obama?
Crooked Hillary, Comey.
Oh my god. So suddenly, the the bombshell
end all be all thing he's gonna do
for us becomes, how are you Democrats still
focusing on this?
Guys, this this is I mean, this is
why honest people, conservatives right now, are going,
dang it. Like, I I that's not true.
That's not even remotely what we were saying
before. So I don't believe you're honest anymore.
And it has broken the partisan game right
now, at least for the moment.
Jeez. And he goes, and all the loser
criminals of the Biden administration. So you're not
now you're pretending that that Biden's administration just
wrote the Epstein files? You see what he's
trying to do? So if this ever comes
out with his name on it, he's gonna
go, Biden's did it. The Democrats lied about
it. Even Donald even Jones already floated the
idea that they were trying to blackmail him
with the with fake information.
They're they're very clearly trying to set this
up. And as even Neapolitano is recognized,
it feels very desperate. It feels like you're
trying to cover for something.
Feels
what's the word he said?
You you know, his reaction when he said
that felt defensive. That was the word he
used. It does.
And it goes for year or it goes
on to say
yeah. It goes and and and con the
whole world, Russia, Russia, Russia gate hopes, laptop
from hell and more. Yeah. We remember that.
They created the Epstein files. What?
They created the Epstein files? Just like they
created the fake Hillary Clinton Steele dossier? Oh
my god. Are you now trying to tell
us Donald Trump that the fake the Epstein
files are fake?
What a well, this is a hard left
turn, guys. This This is not even remotely
what any of them were telling you.
And realize they weren't saying this last month,
a few days ago. They were acting like
they were gonna give you everything because you
still hadn't does not you still hadn't you
you still bought you you still believe them.
Now that you he's he's sensing that nobody's
buying it? Oh, it's all fake news.
Democrat trick.
What did I tell you? For some of
them, it's gonna work.
He goes, that they use on me, and
now my so called friends are playing right
into their hands.
See? Weak minded people are gonna run screaming
because they don't wanna be one of those
people that get manipulated by Trump's you know,
one of the friends that Trump's get your
whatever. I can't say it right. This wanna
be one of those people that get manipulated.
Even though you're not being manipulated, you're finally
seeing the truth. It says, why didn't these
radical left lunatics release them then? Ah, and
there you see they all get their marching
orders or he's following their tune.
Because they're I mean, possibly,
which I believe, because
you're all comp you're all compromised. And so
they didn't release the files because you're all
potentially criminal. It's the same reason that they
used to never really turn on each other
because whether they're on the same side or
not, you're all ultimately on the same side
when it comes to controlling our lives.
If there was anything in there that could
have hurt MAGA movement, why didn't they use
it? And they all come out and screech
the same thing like leave a fray despite
clearly being smart enough to see through something
this simple.
They haven't even given up on r John
f k not r f Kennedy or Martin
Luther King. Right. So we're gonna distract you
over there. In the same you already did
JFK. That didn't turn out very well. You
lied to us, and it didn't give us
any and so now we're pretending like we're
going back to it? Didn't you just tell
us that was over?
This is sad, guys. No matter how much
success we've had securing the border, right, just
here's all the things we're supposed to claim
all went the way we said they did
even though they didn't.
Safer world where Iran will not have nuclear
weapons. Israel just came out and said that
didn't happen. They just said, no. They've still
got material because I told you they would
because that gives them the excuse to keep
going. And so now Trump is counter saving
his leadership
in Israel. It's never enough for some people.
We're about to achieve more in six months
than any administration ever in the last million
years, right, or whatever he says. The same
hyperbolic thing. We did more than anybody ever
of all time. Not true. And we have
so much more to do. We're saving our
country and making America great again. Well, okay.
I thought he I could make jokes all
day. It's just sad to me. Which will
continue to be our complete priority.
The left is imploding.
Was that what's happening?
That's what you'd be wants people to start
saying. Cash Patel and the FBI must be
focused on investigating voter fraud.
Wait. For in what context?
Political corruption act blue? So we're just gonna
point forward to what? The midterms?
Who cares about what's currently happening? Keep focusing
on how we can play into election fraud
and Democrat cheating because that's what seemed to
get your attention. Yeah. Oh, yep. And the
re and 2020. We're still focusing on that.
Look backward, guys. Stop focusing on the current
events.
Wow.
Radical left inspired documents on Jeffrey Epstein.
My god, guys.
You're not stupid. Right? I mean, don't let
this work. You're not this stupid.
Let Pam Bondi do her job. She is
great.
Thanks, Kellogg. The twenty twenty election was rigged
and stolen, and they tried to do the
same thing in 2024.
Okay. But they didn't, though?
I mean, explain this for me. So what
are you what are you saying that they
just didn't they didn't cheat well enough?
I guess. But, I mean, you know, it's
it's just lazy to think that this so
if that's the case, then what are we
fighting right now? Didn't you won? And you
have control of everything. Like, the game is
so clumsy.
The only way any of this makes sense
is if you stand back and recognize that
what we're actually seeing is a power structure
who is using flimsy arguments to keep you
from recognizing that they're losing control over your
narrative.
It says one year ago, our country was
dead.
Now it's the hottest country anywhere, the hottest
country. What is this? The Jersey Shore? We're
watching the you know? I mean, the what
are we doing here, guys?
Hottest country?
I mean, he is dumbing aiming at the
lowest common denominator. That is not what anybody
wants. We don't wanna be fashionable. We don't
wanna be the coolest country, the coolest dictator.
We want the Epstein list. We want people
to go to jail for crimes. That's what
we want.
Wow. Let's keep it that way and not
waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein.
Somebody that nobody cares about.
That's what he said.
My god.
Keep that on file, guys. That's not gonna
age well. Liz Wheeler,
the axial story is true. Pam Bondi and
deputy Dan and Dan Bongino had a yelling
match in a White House over Bondi's egregious
mishandling of the Epstein files, or rather they're
setting this up. Clearly, it seems like she
will be, you know, the potential one thrown
at the bus should that need to be
done.
But this is just her towing line. Let's
not forget,
she was one of them.
Here's my Epstein file phase number one.
That's this you calling her out. So, I
mean, she's simply going, what the mainstream media
just told us is true? Well, that seems
like a hard sell. Well, that's the point.
Scoop. FBI's Dan Bongino clashes with Bondi. So
this is the one exception where you're supposed
to listen to the Democrat media. Right?
Or recognize that they're all selling you the
same lies.
How do you think they got this scoop,
guys?
They're setting narratives for you that don't work
anymore.
Well, David Ike, and this is the Reddit
libertarian saying Megyn Kelly ending Pam Bondi's career
at Turning Point USA.
This is the content I'm here for.
Guys, it's children. Pam Bondi is an appealing,
excuse me. He David Ike says, Pam Bondi
is an appalling attorney general because she was
only appointed, and I agree with this, to
be Trump's yes, sir gopher. That's all she
did. Now people like Kelly want to scapegoat
her and ignore that she was simply doing
the will of her boss. Guys, that's self
evident.
Kelly is either yet another clueless main streamer
diverter diverting the attention of the alternative, or
she knows what she's doing, which is which
would be even worse.
Completely agree with that.
Again, Kash Patel wants Pam Bondi out and
might quit if Dan leaves. What are you?
Six years old? What are you gonna tag?
Do you wanna leave together?
If he quits, I'm leaving.
So what does that mean then? If he
leaves, do you leave? Does that mean you
didn't believe in the Trump administration? Why would
you leave if he leaves? I mean, think
about what this means, guys. Everything's breaking down
in front of you. These people are not
it's the same reason we show you the
administration where Vance and everybody else hated Trump
and vice versa before suddenly they're all in
the team saving we're gonna save everybody together
because we're all the right team. But every
one of you called the other a shill
and a grifter and a liar, and now
you're all I mean, it's because they all
work together to control your life. That's all
it comes down to.
And the censored news points out, as Trump
said, nobody cares about Epstein, which we just
read through.
The FBI must focus on other issues like
political corruption.
Here's the point he makes. Since that isn't
a major facet of the Epstein case or
anything, it's the whole point. See, they really
wanna divert this into just some kind of
sexual discussion instead of what it was being
used to do which is blackmail politicians,
control political outcomes. That's what this is. If
you disagree, you support the radical left, Crooked
Hillary, and the Obama or something.
He sees it. Clearly,
they're desperately trying to tap into basic partisan
division.
So, of course,
Jones steps in, and as David I points
out,
oh, pivot the focus to the Clintons and
the Democrats. Okay. The Clintons are pure evil.
I agree. And I've been and he's been
exposing them, which I have too, and their
abuse of mind controlled slaves and their body
count since the mid nineteen nineties. Yeah. Just
type in Clinton body count on t lab.
You'll find a whole whole bunch of stuff
on it. But Trump and Epstein, best friends
for ten to fifteen years, quote, we're on
the Trump we're we're on the Trump Epstein
files, he says. Oh, I'm sure you are.
But Trump has no history of connection to
any of it, claims Jones. You've become a
parody, mate.
Jones is gaslighting for Trump.
The Clinton trial trafficking network is on the
ground in Texas?
Okay.
We don't don't consider it. Look into it.
But once you begin to realize that there's
not what he's doing is deflecting away from
what's really happening and that what he's giving
you is nothing but a store there's the
idea look. Let's put it this way. Is
the is the Clinton aspect, like a lot
of the government aspects, connected to different aspects
of what we argue are the underground blackmail
or other sex trafficking network? I think the
evidence is undeniable
on all sides of the paradigm. And also
from from overlapping points of international, you know,
foundational, you know, like, even like UN elements.
But also
the,
child protective services point, as they themselves acknowledge,
is like a, like, a funnel for child
trafficking. Not that they they don't claim they're
involved in it, which I do think there's
more to that story, but really just that
they can't help the the overlap of the
net of the, you know, bringing people into
child services, most of them end up in
some kind of abuse situation.
My point is there is a story there,
but for them to jump in and make
it about Texas after they just tried to
deflect on the Texas after he was wrong
about Jed Lai fourth in the revolution, I
mean, they're just kicking this down the road,
guys.
As but David points out, it were simply
point Clinton's pedophiles like I just said. Look
over there. Look over there. And then Trump
talks about Texas and how we saved a
bunch
of children.
You think these things I mean, they're they're
I argue clearly working together in the same
narrative.
Had that not lined up properly?
Right
here. So Trump says and this is Jones
again. Trump says he just announced that they've
rescued 10,000 missing children.
Okay.
No. The way this is being framed is
so dishonest. The idea that just what saved
10,000 children or rather that through this entire
ongoing administration that he somehow has rescued them
from networks. No. No. If you look in
the information, first of all, I don't find
what he's trying to claim is that somehow
they've rescued
300,000
children that are missing and 10,000 that they've
already saved.
Where are we getting this from?
Are we talking about people that you've taken
from you know, is it about migrants? Is
it about I mean, from my what I'm
talking about is this is a narrative they
float out based on flimsy overlapping information that
doesn't have to do with breaking down child
trafficking networks, especially as we are literally covering
you're literally covering for the most obvious example
of that.
Overall,
it is look over here about what I
claim I'm doing as we're covering up for
child trafficking networks. I mean, how do you
not see that?
And, of course, Alex goes right for it.
That's where he goes Texas, and he and
Clinton child def he's just taking him at
face value as he speaks off the cuff
in front of people at an interview. But
David Ike says, so what about the children
missing in Gaza because of the weapons supplied
by Trump? Now different point.
You know, the it's not it's not this
that shouldn't be a taking away from what
he's saying if you think it's true. That
they call it. What about is it? Right?
That's not the point. It's about saying you
you can disagree or believe in this, question
it because I don't think there's evidence to
back it up. Secondarily,
if you care about children, what about the
ones you're killing in Gaza? Doesn't that matter?
What about the children abused by Epstein? His
best buddy for a decade or more. You
think he cares about children?
I I think it's a joke. The same
I mean, if you're murdering people in Gaza
right now, you don't care about children. If
you're killing people in Syria, you don't care
about children. If you're bombing children in Somalia
or Lebanon or anywhere else that are currently
executing children every single day, and you don't
care about children. On top of that, though,
I'd love to see somebody back up anything
you can make a claim that 10,000 children
have been saved.
Show it to me. I'll talk about it.
Of course, Kristi Noem, while everyone's
clearly breaking down, stands up and says d
h she says, the golden age of America
is here.
Right. As you're literally collapsing in front of
people, you're going, we did it. We won.
That's what they do.
Travelers no longer need to remove their shoes
during TSA. Oh, that's what we voted for.
It's just embarrassing. First of all, let's not
forget that the whole thing is a manipulation.
The entire security theater that James Cord was
broken down forever is obviously
they don't care about your shoes, guy. This
is about trying to keep you in control.
Now they're just gonna go, we took it
away, the thing that we didn't really need
in the first place.
So will you ignore Epstein now?
That's what micro, Charlie Robinson says. The golden
age of America is the world class Barnum
statement. Make sure you check out Barnum World,
the different documentary they just put out, or
more of a movie really, but kind of
an important story.
Same thing here. Christy Noem and president Trump
respond to corporate media lies that they withheld
disaster relief from Texas. They're just
after historic fourth of July floods. They just
try to point in this direction.
Richard simply points out the CIA director smirked
and exhales like a man watching his manipulation
pay off as Trump announces yet another round
of weapons for Ukraine. Ratcliffe's expression says it
all. He's right there. Look at this guy.
He was never was never
a surprise. It was the script from day
one. The deep state didn't lose control for
a second and Trump's just another mouthpiece reciting
their lies on cue. But look over there.
Here. Interestingly,
we just talked about this.
Right? It's in the show that we the
we already included the, the one with Bongino
in the front. I think it's the last
one we did.
We talked about the rainmaker point, the idea
of potentially using this. The the overlap with
Texas and whether that's the case, but which
really ended up becoming a larger story about
how AI is causing
the the need for a shocking amount of
fresh water to run all the things they're
doing, which seems like a guaranteed situation where
it's not sustainable.
So the question is, are they using this
to make rain? And the truth the answer
is yes.
That's proven. He admits that. But the question
then becomes, are they doing that or did
they beyond July 2? Because he admits in
more than one case that they did break
cloud seed in Texas on July 2. He
claims it doesn't have an effect for the
fourth. You can decide.
The question is, is there more going on
there or even larger? But funny enough, all
of a sudden, he goes on info wars.
So, allegedly, the rainmaker CEO is going to
be on Alice Jones' show. And Owens already
said he doesn't think the weather modification company
had anything to do with the recent floods.
Funny how that's the way you go when
in every other context, they'll lean into anything
to make that case for the narrative. But
now because he's somebody who is this Lucky
Parmer Anduril Palantir look alike, which is part
of the same kind of direction, suddenly, it's
okay.
Here, Donald Trump responds very weirdly to a
question about Texas.
This whole this all this rings very strange
to me. So, basically, a reporter says families
are upset that the flood warnings did not
go into in effect in the time they
should have.
And the way he responds is not just
defensive. It's I don't know. You tell me
what you think this is. It's very odd.
Here with CBSU of Texas. Several families we've
worked from are
obviously upset because they say that those warnings,
those alerts didn't go out out in time,
and they also say that people could have
been safe. What do you say to those
families?
Okay. So first of all, before he answers,
is that not exactly what he and his
followers do every single moment that Biden has
any kind of event like this? And in
many cases, rightly so. Right? That North Carolina,
whatever. Okay. So the question the point is,
it's not unacceptable. It's not somehow out, you
know,
lacking decorum. It's not, like, outside the realm
of allowance
to question whether or not you conducted yourself
properly during an an emergency. Right?
I mean, they have driven that claim in
many cases that aren't even valid.
He has said things that aren't valid.
And so she stands up and says, I
spoke to people in Texas who said that
didn't happen.
Do you you just you can't get more
valid than that for all of those points.
They have people that live there that said
that they didn't go off when it was
supposed to. So he says, what about that?
The way he responds is very telling. Well,
I think everyone did an incredible job under
the circumstances. This was, I guess, Christie said,
a one in 500, one in a thousand
years.
And,
I just have admiration for the job that
everybody did. There's just
admiration.
The,
only a bad person would ask a question
like that, to be honest with you. I
don't know. Only a bad person would ask
a question like that? How dare you represent
the people in Texas that have an opinion
about what you did? How dare you?
That's just sad. Who you are, but only
a very
bad person would ask a question like that,
to be honest with you. I don't know
who you are, but only a very,
evil person would ask a question like that.
I think Evil. And, of course, you always
have to do this like, who are you?
I don't even know. Even though he usually
does and does that to make them feel
stupid because he's a child like most politicians,
like most presidents we've had. I think this
has been heroism.
This has been incredible,
really, the job you've all done. Okay. So
that wasn't the question, Trump. She didn't downplay
or dismiss
everything else that happened. Asked a very pointed
and specific question about something that I pick
up on clearly probably has relevance.
That's why he the same way he responds
with Epstein. Defensive. Dismissive.
Maybe there's something to that story. Maybe the
alert didn't go off on time. Can you
imagine if it was Biden that did that?
They've turned it into some conspiracy about lithium
or something or whatever else even though those
things should be asked. But it's very telling,
isn't it?
It's easy to sit back and say, oh,
what could have happened here or there? You
know? He's talking about people in Texas who
have those complaints. Now you're dismissing American opinions?
You get the point. It's the same point
across the whole conversation that if this is
sad, embarrassing, dismissive, and all you're really doing
is acting like that person's evil for asking
a valid question, and all of his followers
will cheer along because that's what you're supposed
to do. Had I been Biden in that
situation with the exact same circumstances, they would
have been building it into the biggest thing
ever. You all know this. Same thing on
either side of the partisan game. And we
could have done something differently. This was
a a thing that, says never happened before.
Yeah. There's it's the idea. One in a
thousand very much disputed about the reality of
that. Nobody's ever seen anything. I've never seen
anything like this. I've gone to some real
bad ones. We looked up the the regarding
the weather. Yeah. It was it my point
about this is record rainfall and flooding. We've
seen a lot of places across the country.
That's why I thought of I overlapped it
with the possibility of whether that might be
something that's being done with the AI point.
It makes sense. Consider it. But my point
when you look into the information, the way
that they're trying to make it out to
be some unicorn I mean, it's just it's
dishonest framing in my opinion. I've never seen
anything like this. So,
I Oh, you mean except for the other
many places happening in the country at the
same time? Yep. Never before. I can I
admire you, and I consider you
heroes and heroin?
And, I think you've done an amazing That's
very woke of you, Trump. Way to be
equal about it.
So David Icke says, this man is an
empathy deleted, self obsessed, psychopathic buffoon in disgrace.
It was a legitimate question.
The very evil person was the one posed
was the one posed the question, not the
one who asked it.
Like all cult leaders, we have the con
the constant soup,
soup, what is that? Super lap how do
you say that? Let me look it up.
I always say this is funny when you
read something.
Superlative.
Oh, okay. Superlative. See, that's so strange. Like,
I was just I was just gonna say,
it's so weird when you read something and
then, you know, you basically, something you've never
it's just interesting how that works. So so,
basically,
as it said, to give it exactly, so
I'm not misquoting it, something of the highest
possible excellence, superlative.
In any case, like all court leaders, we
have the the constant superlatives,
like, never anything before. Like, that's that's I
call I say hyperbolic.
Same kind of idea, like, just it's, you
know,
it's not true. Right? The idea that everything
is always the biggest. Like, that's what he
says about the things he does. Never before
seen, like, more than any country, ever seen
in history of any country ever existed, you
know, when really it's not. It's just it's
I honestly, it's a sign of weakness.
It is. It's a sign of weakness to
constantly have to build up yourself in dishonest
ways. It's like I said, when you pound
your chest and say I'm strong, usually you're
the weakest one in the room.
Psychopathic,
sociopathic moron, he says, the most ridiculous corrupt
president in American history, and think of the
competition.
I agree with that. Now Stephen Miller, of
course, again, let this sink in. Los Angeles
is waging insurrection
against the federal government.
So here's Stephen Miller, while all that's going
on, trying to go look over there, insurrection,
divide the country, collapse
So Zionism needs for the end times.
The bottom line is this is calling this
insurrection while people push back against an illegitimate
practice. That's not about getting rid of, you
know, of deporting illegal aliens and going through
the proper process. That's that is the legal
reality.
That's not what's happening. If you haven't come
to terms with that yet, you're either dishonest
or blind.
Caroline Levitt says Trump hits a home run
with June's job report.
Wow. Oh my god. I mean, what an
incredible story. Yeah. We're just blown away.
I just talk about desperation. A home run
with the job with the numbers you randomly
put together that we don't trust. I mean,
they it's just so fun. Jobs reports or
unemployment.
We are all don't we all know by
now that they alter and manipulate and contort
these things to make it they lie all
the time.
But even if they're absolutely accurate, yay,
the jobs report.
I mean, there's matters to plenty of circumstances,
people. But in this moment,
tell me that's not sad.
Lastly, since we
were yeah. We'll we'll wrap this up. I
wasn't sure if I was gonna get to
all this, but we're we're under four hours.
Let's let's finish it up. The ending point,
guys, is to simply continue to show you
that Israel,
in many obvious ways, is
influencing, if not controlling, US policy,
which, by the way, is what I've been
talking about for a very long time and
not some conspiratorial way using facts. And at
one point, not too long ago,
very one very particular person who we got
into it with called me a white supremacist,
a neo Nazi for pointing out what even
he now seems to point out. Not worth
getting into because I'm hopefully, I never got
an apology, but hopefully, some of these people
have come to the reality that, yeah, maybe
maybe saying that the government was occupied was
not some trope from a not Nazi's discussion
board was an obvious example and point through
evidence that our government is being influenced by
a foreign government. Jews don't even come into
the conversation other than overlapping it with Zionism
and in Israel or anywhere in the world
where Zionists are manipulating the Jewish religion. It
happened in Christianity. It even happens in atheism
as even weirdly what's his name? Sam Harris
just basically made that point for me, coming
out and admitting as an atheist that he's
a Zionist because thank you for making the
point. But the reality, guys, it is
on display. As Patrick Henneson points out, defense
secretary Pete Hegseth meets with Israeli prime minister
at the Pentagon.
It's like the English tag team back and
forth. One flies there, one flies back. One
flies there, one flies back. Almost like they're
working in tandem. And Patrick Kennington said, although
it's being front fronted by a Fox News
weekend host, the real question rises, is Mossad
running the Pentagon?
This is just them talk sitting down we
already showed you, but I figured it's worth
playing again the one we just played,
literally about the Pentagon.
It's unquestionable that the Epstein business was
heavily influenced, let me put it that way,
by Mossad.
And so that's somehow emblematic on these huge
geopolitical issues.
Yes. I I watched Mossad
take over the Pentagon
in 02/2002.
The Pentagon was infiltrated
by Mossad.
They did not need any identification
to get through the river entrance to the
building. They went upstairs to Douglas Fife, the
undersecretary
of defenses
for policy, the third most powerful man in
the defense department.
Occasionally, they went to the second most powerful
man, Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense,
and they had run-in the Pentagon. Donald Roosevelt,
the secretary of defense, said to my boss
one time, hell, I don't run my building.
Mossad does.
It's just wild
how much evidence that we have.
Now
I'm gonna play this clip. It's about five
minutes, but I figured I wanna I'm let's
play it. Let's just get it all out
there today. And it's a great clip put
together by gen x girl, by the way,
put this out in 2024
about Susie Wiles,
who at the time we were also very
critical of like we were with a lot
of them in the many different ways, including
connections to Israel. This one is now becoming
even more relevant seeing as how it just
came out even more so that it seems
that Susie Wiles,
Trump's chief of staff,
is
potentially the handler aspect of a lot of
this coming from the Israeli direction.
We're also gonna show you a clip about
Patel Cash or, Cash Patel. And the question
being posed from James Lee about whether his
girlfriend is a Mossad agent and whether that
somehow influenced his current situation.
And then we're gonna wrap up with a
couple points about where we currently are.
I was texting last evening
to Susie Wiles, who is the
chairperson of president Trump's campaign. She is a
strong believer. She often
tunes in with us here at Preston Wood,
to watch and to experience worship with us.
She's a good friend
and she has led.
She's one of those smart
conservative women
who's
leading this campaign.
And in Genesis chapter six Mhmm. And, verse
seven and verse 11, it speaks of this
violence which can be, is Hamas is the
word, and it it literally means not only
violence, but evil violence.
And so Hamas,
the word is in the Hebrew text of
the Old Testament.
And and therefore,
it it's just a reminder to us
that the evil violence of this age, when
we see this kind of the beheading of
babies, the
execution of families, the the burning alive of
people, all the travesties and tragedies that All
of which didn't happen, by the way, in
case you forgot. That have been reported and
and proven,
by this,
atrocious these these people,
Hamas, are these are mass murderers. They are
demon possessed evildoers.
There's no nuance to this as to who
Hamas is and what they are about. They
are you know, people say, can't we just
have peace? Can't we just get a truce?
You can't you can't find peace or, you
know,
you can't develop a relationship with people who
wanna kill you and and really deny your,
even right to exist. You Yeah. Palestinians know
that well even though they still try. Can't
you can't negotiate
with evil. Mhmm. And And my point I
always make about this is that I I
don't you're in my opinion, you can never
call yourself a man of god
or a woman of god
if you,
no matter the narrative,
support what's going on in Gaza.
I don't care what you're I don't care
if you argue every child's got 17 guns
strapped to their back. The idea that you're
okay with that many children being killed in
any context,
that you're that you're not a man of
God. I'm sorry. It's just not that is
my point is if you look at any
of these, whether Judaism or Christianity or or
any of it, if you actually look at
the reality of it, there's no place in
which you support, you know, death in any
real context other than the idea of, you
know,
in specific biblical dynamic. My point is just
take make it simple.
Children
bombing
people being
killed. Children, women, elderly.
How you somehow contort that into being because
bad guy?
I it's it's like looking at somebody like
Rabbi Schmooly and acting like this person actually
represents anything good.
These are horrible people who spout horrible racist
hateful things all the time.
This is it it's just a simple reality,
guys. And it's not to say the other
side is necessarily good.
In any context, the point is just to
acknowledge that people like this that stand up
and say, I support that ongoing genocide.
There's something wrong with you.
And
so God didn't negotiate with evil. No. God
destroyed everyone in that generation because of Hamas,
because of the evil doings
and the evil violence
of that age. That was the signature
sign
that Jesus gave us of the last days.
We have a great love
for Israel.
And God gave us his word through the
Jewish people, and God gave us the Messiah
through the Jewish people. And
whether in this country and certainly in the
place that God has given Israel, the state
of Israel, the nation of Israel Say, well,
who who who has he got around him?
Then you look at his campaign manager, who
is also in charge of his path. The
person who by any and all accounts controls
all access to Trump
and who,
most importantly, apparently controls the schedule to an
extent. And again, if anybody who ever works
with anybody who's got any authority or power
knows that if you really wanna know who's
controlling the day, it's the person who's managing
the schedule, right?
So I look around and I start seeing
Suzy Wiles name and I see it over
and over
And I keep saying, well, you know, people
say to me, hey, we're trying to get
with Trump. Can you help? Well, no. I
can't help. I got no connections.
But,
what's the problem? They said, well, this Susie
Wiles character won't let us in. Won't let
us in. What was that? Okay. Well, why
is that? You're a mega guy. Why why
can't you get in? They said she won't
let us. So I started looking into this
woman, right?
And again, in charge of Trump's campaign and
his PAC, arguably his closest advisor, when I
asked my friends who are close to Trump,
they said you don't get a meeting without
Trump unless she's in the room. You don't
get a phone call unless she's in the
room. She's omnipresent.
I said, okay, well, what's her story? So
I look her up and I start doing
some research.
And we find out that, first of all,
there's some real questions about her related to
DeSantis and her work with DeSantis and some
of the others. You know, some questions about
whether she was loyal, whether she was shady,
whether she was this, she was that. But
right there, what you're showing is the key.
Mercury. Right? So she's the co chair
for a company called Mercury LLC,
Florida DC offices. Mercury LLC is key. If
you look at Mercury LLC, while she's working
with Donald Trump, she's also getting paid to
work for Mercury LLC. Well, Mercury LLC
is the uni party swamp. Okay? Mercury LLC
represents Gavi. They represent the UN Foundation.
They represent Pfizer. They represent Gillian. They represent
Hope you're listening. We've talked about this.
Like like every other example in this crowd,
right, the point from my my opinion is
that this is about whether it's compromised in
its own way. There the bigger picture other
than the back other connections we're discussing is
that just that you've been lied to and
to acknowledge that these people the the entirety
of what you're being sold is not what
you were promised.
All of these groups. So these guys, what
they'll do is you've got these these consulting
firms. They represent democrats. They represent republicans. If
you wanna get elected, you work with them.
That's they're right. They're the uni party. They're
the reason that it doesn't matter whether you're
a d or r. You do the same
thing. Because if you wanna get elected, you
support their causes. What are their causes? Well,
look at their clients.
In this case, with Mercury, you got Gilead,
you've got Pfizer, you've got the Gavi. Anyone
that's all about controlling our genome and destroying
us with these mRNA poisons and other genetic,
modifying type type,
things. These guys are all all all working
with Mercury.
Very interesting.
Now the bottom line, guys,
if we can't see by now, that mean
the Bondi, Pfizer overlap, and it it goes
in so many different directions.
You know? It it just have to under
we have to be honest about what we
can see right now. And, you know, whether
you think it's connected with Israel or not,
the reality of how we are being led
down a path that I mean, at the
very least,
people were being, you know, were being sold
the idea of what we want what they
want you to think this is, and then
taking a completely different step forward, going in
a completely different direction.
I mean, and just, you know, so so
many go, oh, but I hope that just
doesn't you know, there must be something that
explains why he took that. Maybe he'll circle
back later.
Instead of doing that, just go, that was
the wrong step. That is a bad path.
That's not what we're promised. And still hope,
still support if that's what you want.
But just recognize that I think what my
opinion is that this is this really is
where we're at. Whether it's an individual dynamic
of one person and one person, whether it's
a black male dynamic, whether it's Epstein never
really went away. However you wanna look at
it, I think it's very obvious that our
policy is being dictated by these kind of
outside forces. Here's what James Lee just just
was highlighting around Kash Patel. Director of the
FBI caught up in an Israeli honeypot operation.
Alright. Here's the context. Quote, some social media
users have wondered whether the FBI and the
US Justice Department's refusal to release the list
of Jeffrey Epstein's clients could have something to
do with Alexis Wilkins, the 26 year old
girlfriend of 45 year old FBI director Cash
Patel. This is what people online are pointing
to, the fact that Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins,
works for PragerU,
which is a media company that supposedly espouses
American values, except for the fact that it
is run by
a former Israeli military intelligence officer. Now, I
did a bunch of digging and unfortunately, there's
actually not a lot of public information to
go off of in terms of Alexis Wilkins
background. Now, what I was able to find
is that her father worked for Gillette and
that her mother was in aerospace and pharmaceuticals.
It also says that they lived in England
and Switzerland before settling in Fayetteville, Arkansas when
she was nine. It also says that she
attended College du Limon International
School in Switzerland. Now interestingly, Chat GbT is
calling this a strange biographical
gap in that she has no visible friend
network or public high school college cohort interviews,
which they say is unusual for a public
figure in entertainment,
and that if a Mossad asset were inserted
early in life, these gaps would be precisely
where you would hide alternate history or handler
training. Doctor Simon Godick says that Alexis Wilkins
is nearly twenty years younger than Kash and
also works for an NGO that's Israeli intelligence.
That's PragerU that he's referring
to. And he says, seriously, why would an
attractive young woman date a not so attractive
Indian American? Classic honeypot. I mean, I don't
know. Who are we to really judge what
people are attracted to and not attracted to?
Anyway, I'm not sure what's true or what's
not true, but evidently, these are, quote, classic
elements used in honeypot operations,
soft power, ideological alignment, and sexual emotional entanglement.
Let me know what you think. Yeah. Worth
considering.
Now you also have to consider that, you
know, people we tend to espouse like, you
know, ascribe ascribe, you know, intentions. Like, they
they do this because they're fighting for America
because they said so. Maybe.
Or maybe they just want power.
Maybe they just want control. Maybe they just
wanna find a hot girl. You know, they
just want the position so they can get
the girl. My point is that I get
that sense from all of these people.
They'll they'll they'll feed you whatever narrative they
think you wanna hear, but at the end
of the day, maybe he's not really concerned
with the outcome. He doesn't care about the
FSN list. He just cares about saying what
you think you wanna hear. And so even
if this woman is working for he doesn't
care, that he's getting the benefit of it
all. I you have to consider that that's
a part of this, that a lot of
these people just wanna be in the know
in the inside. They wanna gain. And so
they'll
they this not even like they're being fooled
into this trap.
Some of them just don't care. I think
that's worth considering.
Now last few points,
just what we're seeing.
Here's Arson Ostrovsky, the fake human rights lawyer
saying and just quoting net Netanyahu because they
love to shove it in your face. In
the entirety of seventy seven years of Israeli
history, Israel's history, this is what Netanyahu said,
there's never been the degree of coordination,
cooperation, and trust between The US and Israel
that we have today, and I credit president
Trump with this extraordinary achievement. Now whether you
agree with it or not,
that's not what Americans want.
The vast, vast, vast majority,
despite the inner circle, despite the screaming Zionists
pretending they represent America. Guys, it's not what
it's not what conservatives want. But he stands
up and goes, we control. We have more
influence
ever before. I simply said, hashtag winning.
Same thing. Say
hey, Seth. On the ninth, today, I hosted
prime minister Netanyahu to honor the historic success
of Operation Midnight Hammer and the cell which
wasn't a success, and to celebrate Israel's special
partnership with The United States. What a creepy
way to frame that. Do you read this
person supposed to be in prison? You're obligated
by the ICC and the ICJ to do
something about that, but they don't care, guys,
because they're part of the problem.
Danny McAdams,
send this liar and murderer back home. Here
he goes on the tenth and goes on
Fox News and starts to tell people in
America,
Iran wants to acquire wrong wrong range missiles
with warheads to attack every American
right back to his dutiful talking
points. Guys, how do we not see what's
going on?
I'll leave you with this. Caroline Levitt says,
Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. He's achieved
more in those than with than than those
who've won before.
Oh my god. And puts this out.
A peace prize with a picture next to
the most wanted and for notorious person on
the planet. Imagine being so desperate as to
write this while the picture you're showing
is of Trump next to the most reviled
genocidal monster on the planet,
currently committing genocide, and who's literally bombing and
starving children,
bombing starving children as you smile next to
him with your bombs, surveillance, and artificial intelligence.
I how is that not desperation?
Guys, they know you see this. They know
we're calling it out, and the best they
can do is go look at the jobs
numbers.
Nobel Peace Prize, while most of the world
is going terrorist,
put them into I mean, yeah, it's it's
not about left or right or Trump versus
Biden. It's about the people in the world
recognizing what the US government, not the American
people, the American government
is responsible for, is doing,
whether it's because they're compromised or because they're
the ones leading this calling the shots. The
point is the world is not buying. It
has been for a long time. But for
the first time in my doing this, I'm
seeing more Americans than I've ever seen
begin to call it out. Now what what
do I expect?
Tomorrow, the next day, very quickly, if not
right now, another
something,
another partisan driven chaos narrative that drive people
back into the conversation,
and probably not the majority, but just enough.
And chip by chip, and moment by moment,
they'll drive people back in to the same
old thing.
Is that what you want? It's not what
I want. I don't believe most people out
there want that at all,
so don't let it
happen. Thank you for tuning in.
Please support this platform
under attack every day. We put this out
for free because we believe in the content.
If it means something to you, if you
find value in this, show us what it
means to you. I love you all. As
always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.