It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Reality. Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another and
ourselves.
Help your own influence. Your own influence. Help
us take joy.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Wednesday, 07/02/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Had a
great show yesterday, really in-depth. Went through a
lot of a lot of topics, very, very
in-depth. So today, following up when we've been
you know, it we get trying to get
back to the routine we had before, doing
much more consecutive shows. It's odd to do
the next day and feel like, you know,
looking for thing. Or just today, kind of
jokingly, today, we're gonna go over a lot
of things that I just think are, you
know, stories that I would like, when it
we're focusing on larger things going on, for
example, like a deep dive on one story
or another. Sometimes the smaller things get pushed
to the side or not necessarily less important.
But today, I've got I pulled in a
bunch of different things that I want to
talk about that I thought were really interesting.
Some things that I was have seen today
for the first time, other things that I've
had kind of around for a while, and
some of the things we've touched on frequently
on this show, but a lot to cover
today. So I'm sure you're gonna enjoy the
show today. There's a lot of different kind
of overview points of the, you know, partisan
dynamics
and Trump and Elon. We're gonna talk about
that to start really at one of the
earlier parts.
This is not to say that I'm necessarily
convinced that what's happening is false,
but just that there's
actually,
about an hour ago, I saw one more
thing that I really put me over the
edge. I said, okay.
And now I'm officially suspect about what this
is. But I think there's a reason to
be suspect, and we'll go into what, you
know, the different
historical overlaps, the, you know, the common way
that when there's a new moment to be
made or a new movement to be created
in order to circumvent what's happening, you always
find these kind of things happen where a
character will step outside, and I finally see
through everything, and I'm gonna start the and
and then it turns out to be one
more thing that brings you back in. Even
Gabbard feels like that to me as we're
now
seeing. But so what we should my point
is we should always ask that question.
Is this contrived? Is this a reaction to
the fact that we didn't buy what happened
first and this is to create some new
party to drive? You know, all that we
should be asking.
But I'll go through reasons I don't think
that that suggest that might not be the
case as well. But there's a lot that's
happening right now that really stands out to
me is at least what we've seen kind
of the the structure of how these things
have gone before.
So we'll go over that today. And, you
know, both sides of it, like I said,
also talk about what it might mean if
Elon Musk genuinely is breaking away. Now to
be to be,
you know, clear about it, it's it's not
just the fact that these two people who
are public figures are fighting. It's about the
implications of the most powerful person, you know,
arguably as the president in this country,
splitting with his chief ally as it's been
for a long time and also one of
the most influential, powerful, and rich people on
the planet. That just seems obviously important to
just the dynamics of this government, but also
all the many things they're involved in, from
Elon Musk and his contracts with the US
government and others, the different countries around the
world that are, like, overlapped with different genocides
and foreign policy elements of The US, where
he's involved with Starlink, and there's just so
many intertwined points. And for the so for
this to be happening,
honestly, to get ahead of it, that's one
of the reasons why I'm suspect about this.
How in the world that can even be
decoupled is beyond me. But maybe they're just
too full of ego to care, but we'll
go through it. But we're gonna talk about
quite a bit today and just interesting things.
We'll start with a a couple of different
points around health
that I'm as as I'm sure you've all
seen, we've never ever really stopped covering this
story. It has to keep being covered. But
there's a lot of stuff that just you
know, right, there's a lot of moving parts
to this. I'm really waiting for some kind
of next move in a big sense to
be able to really you know, whatever we
all kind of expect, whether some new
event that happens to rationalize some new step
or whether it is a real thing that's
rationalized, you know, the same kind of thing.
So talking about different points of RFK Jr
and the Maha movement and the contradictions they're
in. We'll talk about, to start,
Susan,
Manares,
the handpick
nominee for CDC director, which
I just stands out as an obvious, not
what we would expect from a Maha choice.
We'll go through that. We're gonna talk about
some overlaps of COVID nineteen and accusations against
Fauci, which I think are gonna be hollow
seeing as how it's it's almost like they're
going out of their way. A lot of
it revolves around the conversation from the recent
Tucker interview.
And the one part about Fauci and mRNA
seems like they were doing mental gymnastics to
not mention that Trump was the person that
was involved in controlling that whole thing the
whole time, and we'll go over why it's
more than one party, as well as the
direction of the mRNA and where this goes,
seeing as how they're acting like on that
interview, that this is something that we're, you
know, very skeptical of, except at the same
time saying that the science shows that it's
totally okay. I it's we're being snowed. I
think it's very obvious when it comes to
that. But we're gonna talk about early in
the first segment something that relates to health
that really was just
just interesting.
And this has to do with something that
came out today, an alarming to be clear
and gross, but CBS News and others, billions
of flies to be dumped out of planes
in an effort to fight flesh eating maggot
known as the man eater over Texas and
Mexico. We're gonna talk about that in the
beginning section here. This just I mean, my
my joke to somebody who's, like, someone, like,
trying to start a pandemic. I mean, that's
it's like that's we'll go through it. And
the very clear evidence that shows that a
billion flies or it a lot of flies,
it's almost a guarantee to cause some kind
of increased illness
for a lot of historic reasons. But, you
know, we'll go over the back and forth
of that and what that means and why
they claim they're doing it.
Talking about some technocratic overlaps that I think
are important that we briefly touched on, but
I think are relevant to talk about again
today as it connects to other stories we're
going into,
some two party illusion stuff that I think
is important that connect to all the other
parts, but really about how they're using these
narratives to try to drive you into, you
know, some cases, one, but two camps it
seems. People are choosing their sides between Musk
and Elon, and I think that's also kind
of it feels contrived.
And overlapping that with a point that, again,
doesn't necessarily have to be included today, but
an interesting overlap to Butler
and, Donald Trump and the alleged assassination and
information to think about today in the larger
picture and how interesting it is to think
about now with things that we can look
at. And then again, Elon Musk and that
division and kind of, like, the whole thing
of him. What happened to Doge? And what
happened like, not the narrative and the statements,
but
with his involvement and what's actually happening now.
Did it just peter out, or is it
just something we're ignoring? Like, it's a very
strange evolution of events lately with all of
these things, especially down the middle of the
division of the MAGA movement where, you know,
thirty seconds ago, the world was gonna change
because of Elon. And now it's suddenly we're
not sure. People like Kat turned have just
turned on him all of a sudden like
you'd expect. But then we're also gonna talk
about
foreign policy,
Iran, Gaza, and the fake cease fire yet
again, and some other foreign policy points to
not rattle them off to start. But, again,
with the fake cease fire, again, which we
all expected, anybody on us has been paying
attention even remotely for the entire time, goes
the same way every single time from Trump
to Biden or anybody else.
The offer gets point you know, shown or
who knows if that's even the case to
Israel and Israel agrees, and they go, the
the ceasefire is in agreement and I hope
we hope Hamas is on board too. Or,
really, the framing is to make it sound
like, you know, we're waiting for Hamas's response
when they haven't even been shown the documents
yet. And then when they look at it,
the response somehow becomes like they're they're not
they're not sure about the ceasefire. It hasn't
even started yet. And now when they come
back and say, well, this is the same
old reason that we said no last time,
they go, they're not accepting the ceasefire. It's
like it's just the same tired series of
events. And we'll go over where that is
and where the current reality is for both
Iran, Gaza, and some points on Syria.
But let's start with some other some overarching
points that I think are important to cover,
and then we'll get into some health. Or
rather, actually, I take it back. I moved
some things around. We're gonna start right with
the health topic today.
So tune in, guys. Lots to talk about.
Let me know in the chat what you're
thinking. I try to pay attention as best
I can. I don't think I have any
notes to get into to start.
I thought I I think I've won. This
is why I said that, and I can't
remember. So let's get started. This is just
something that,
I I thought was funny that kind of
really does have an overarching point to just
a lot of what we talk about, and
I love Sal the Agarest in general. I
think he's, you know, very humorous in a
lot of the ways he puts together,
you know, valid criticism.
This is just this I thought this was
hilarious because of the the the meme that
we've seen of that girl. And it's actually
a video, but, you know, become a meme,
which I guess videos are memes. But, you
know, the point is it's a a meme
in and of itself, the idea. And then
the video is where how how it was
known of this girl in the purple shirt
as a a child that has that, like,
that face she gives. You can see it
for now on the podcast right there. It's
like just that in a skeptical face. Like,
what are you talking about? And it it's
been used so many times, and it's very
funny. If you listen to the podcast, you
you gotta look at the picture. And then
I don't know if you saw this. This
this happened a minute ago, but she, as
an adult, put a picture out. I mean,
in the same, you know, fake strap and
the seat was just hilarious.
And so or or at least as far
as I understand, maybe it was somebody else
that looks like her. I I I kinda
just assumed, which is just because of the
meme, that it might have been the same
person that's why it was funny. Either way,
the point is them on the first one,
the Patriot Act is only temporary.
The Patriot Act, well, this time later, same
face,
thirty years later. You know? And it's like,
that's the whole thing, guys. And every single
thing in fact, off the top of my
head, Jason Bassler put out something on his
Instagram. I can't remember off the top of
my head, but listed off all the kind
of things. When they say security, it means
this. When they say that, it means this.
Historically, it's exactly what always seems to happen.
Whether they're by design or not in their
minds,
it's consistent.
So everything we're talking about, whether it's what's
in the bill and the different biometric overlaps,
AI, or, you know, or or the things
that we argue are necessary, but we don't
really want. Yeah. They're not going away, guys.
History shows us that. Anybody on this has
always told you that. Even people in people
like Massey or people like RFK Junior will
tell you that. When you give power away,
they never give it back.
You know, except for narrative today that Trump
says or narrative that Biden or whoever the
Democrat becomes tomorrow says today that becomes the
reason why. It's an exception for right now,
but that's the partisan field.
Dwindling by the moment, and I think we
all notice that. So starting in
health,
Sasha Lotapova
put out a statement around what RFK Junior
recently said.
And she said well, let me actually, let
me play this first and I'll read her
statement. Sense Receptor put this out saying this
was, June 30 was when the interview was.
Tucker Carlson asked RFK Junior if the COVID
vaxx killed more than it saved.
Freeman answers.
You already know this answer. One, because the
facts are clear. Two, because we've shown you
the science repeatedly every time it comes to
pass. And three, because he told you that
before he got to this position.
You know? Now and and even this statement
makes it feel like maybe now they play
this game where they allow you to think
that he's kinda playing the political game, but
we wink wink, nobody actually means, except his
actions
to this point, which is fair,
show you the opposite.
Who knows? Maybe tomorrow, something will spin around
that changes the whole story. But as of
right now,
you're being lied to.
MRNA platforms, mRNA shots. So let's listen to
what he has to say and try to
make sense of this.
Pfizer vaccine,
when it came out,
it
it should it it had a higher,
all cause mortality. So more people died in
the placebo group. I mean, more people died
in the vaccine group than in the placebo
group.
I had twenty thousand people who got the
vaccine, twenty thousand who didn't. And after six
months, they looked at it, and there was
twenty three percent more deaths
and the vaccine and it grew from all
causes. Yeah. You know that because you watch
this show. And and I don't remember if
he pointed that or at that out at
the time, but he has been critical of
this well before he became this this position.
But you know that information because we covered
that as it came out every single time
new information came out. In fact, well before
it did, along with a lot of us
who were simply looking at their own data
and saying, look. They're lying. Look at the
information. Look at how they're altering this to
show you a wrong picture. It's all come
out now. Right? But that was stuff that
we were showing and a lot of us
going to the actual trial science and saying,
look at what it says. That's not what
they're claiming. And he also makes the point
of why they claimed a 100%,
wildly dishonest. There's nobody in the room, nobody
in any honest position or nobody in any
position that's honest that would argue what he's
about to tell you adds up to a
100% effective. They knew they were lying to
you from day one, and we have to
be honest about that. And so even these
kind of wishy washy kind of statements, they
they worry me.
And in the placebo group. And the the
efficacy was kind of dubious because well, yeah.
There was only two people who died from
COVID in the placebo group,
and it was
Is that is that video out of sync
for you guys?
Let me know in the chat. Is that
is that video acting funny, or is it
just on my end? I won't stop it
again if it's just on my end.
Always something going on here. This is the
way we the way it works for us.
It it was it was acting all funny,
and the audio is out of sync with
the with the birds. Let me know if
that's happening. I'll try to maybe I can
refresh it.
COVID and the vaccine group and that's Here,
let me do this real quick.
See if it helps.
Yeah. Somebody's saying it's out of sync. Okay.
It's not just me.
See if this fixes it. Pfizer vaccine,
one eight I guess not. Well, let's just
listen to the audio, guys. It's not necessary
to really see their faces, but it's obviously
you can see that it's RFK Jr and
Tucker Carlson. Just listen to the audio, and
I'll put it where it was.
Ceba group. And the the efficacy
was kind of dubious because well, yeah. There
was only two people who died from COVID
in the placebo group,
and there was one person who died from
COVID in the vaccine group. And that's the
whole dataset they were we're looking at. And
so they said,
you remember they were saying the vaccine is
a 100% effective? Well, that's why they were
saying it because
there was,
there was
two two is a 100% of one. Right?
A 100% larger than one. So that but
that's what they had what they were telling
the American people is a 100% effective. And
that when people heard that, they thought,
if you get the vaccine, you can't get
COVID, which, of course, now we realize now
everybody realizes was wrong.
Yeah. We said that at the time, by
the way. You know we did. And we
were one of the earlier ones to say
that, but there were a lot of us
because we looked at the facts. Because everybody
got COVID whether they got the vaccine or
not.
And, you know, what they really should have
been telling people
is,
that in order to prevent one death from
COVID, you had to give 19,999
vaccines.
If any of those vaccines were killing people,
you would cancel out the effect.
And they were.
And on top of that, whether it's death
or not, we know that there was a
shockingly high amount of very serious side effects,
which just as much cancels it out for
me. Of, you know, the beneficial effect. Do
you think the COVID I mean,
net net, as we say in business
just kidding. Do you think overall the COVID
vaxx killed more than it saved? My opinion
about that is irrelevant.
What we're gonna try to do is make
that science available so the public can look
at the science. Yep.
And I would not say one way or
the other. And the truth is I don't
know. And the reason I don't know is
because,
the studies that were done by my agency
were substandard, and they were not designed to
answer that question.
You realize how dishonest that is to start
to act like we don't know? Like, if
you okay. Then why did he say that
before you got in this position? Were you
lying then, or are you trying to make
it political now? The look. I agree. The
science that we they did was deliberately deceptive,
but it's not only from your broken agencies
that we know this stuff. We know this
from around the world. We know this from
other independent researchers, and we also know it
from the information we did get from your
studies that aren't necessarily broken, the information they
tried to hide. But the point is we
can see these things. And look. I mean,
we're really gonna pretend like we can't just
objectively look around and recognize how obvious it
is that these things are deadly.
Deadly.
It just bothers me that because right now,
you understand that somebody might be on the
fence and hears that and go, okay. They
might decide to do it or might decide
to wait, and they might not understand that
that's not his real opinion. At least it
wasn't before.
And by the way,
I'll just check the video from my side
on, you know, on my computer, and it's
perfectly fine. So I guess it's StreamYard. Who
knows why? Maybe it's just me. Wouldn't surprise
me today, but who cares? Let's keep going.
The interesting point, though let me finish. I
think that was oh, there's another one more
minute. I think. And there's been a lot
of obfuscation.
We're gonna try to do is make that
science available. 99 vaccines.
If any of those vaccines were killing people
I mean,
net net, as we say in business
just kidding. Do you think overall, the COVID
vax killed more than it saved? My opinion
about that is irrelevant.
Why would that be irrelevant?
What are you not the head of HHS?
Would they it's like, you are the opinion
that is relevant more than anybody.
I just this just kills me because, you
know, I that that is, I think,
you could argue like, let's just say he
makes all the right choices following this. You
could argue that maybe he was trying to,
you know, save himself some flack. I just
I just I you know me. I am
not gonna go if you're you're not being
honest. That that is not a principled stance
even if you think it's over oh, at
the end of the day, more beneficial.
And I'm not you could even argue that
I'm wrong in that. I'm just simply saying
that more than ever for because of the
way we are in the world or where
we are with these governments, we have to
demand absolute adherence to principles. You know? If
you think that, then tell us the truth.
I don't care if it causes you problem.
That's why we put you there if you
believe that. You know, I don't. I'm just
saying from the mindset of people, you were
elected to this position, not to play the
political game, but to act for what the
people who put you there wanted.
Isn't that the whole lie we tell ourselves?
Just this frustrates me. What we're gonna try
to do is make that science available so
the public can look at the science. You
know? Already there.
And I would not say one way or
the other. And the truth is I don't
know. And the reason I don't know is
because,
the studies that were done by my agency
were substandard, and they were not designed to
answer that question. And there's been a lot
of obfuscation
about,
about covering up,
as you know, about suppressing any kind of
discussion of vaccine injuries. I mean
Yeah. Yeah. And and who was the president
while that was happening again? Well, both. But,
I mean, realistically, guys, you have to understand
that Fauci,
the main dynamic in this, and Donald Trump
were the two I mean, he started Operation
Warp Speed. I mean, I don't need to
go through all the talking points. Everybody knows
this. Most people try to hide from it
right now. But, realistically,
it's very strange. We'll we'll come to the
Fauci point in a second.
But let let's let's find out if the
rest of these videos are the same way.
That would tell us something, wouldn't it? But
here, let oh oh, and I wanna play
this since he mentions this. And because this
is a quick clip, but this is actually
really important. I tried to play this as
often as I could when it was relevant
during the whole the midst of the COVID
nineteen illusion. And that is when they chose
and, guys, this is one
of, like I mean, we we I really
should make a list of the of the
different points, and there were tons of them,
where it's undeniable
that you look at what what the decision
that was made, and then you look at
the outcome, and you look at all the
information that was there, and it's impossible not
to feel to see that they they chose
the direction, not to say necessarily on purpose,
but they chose the direction that maximized
the the the negative outcome. Now I do
believe it's almost near mathematically impossible to accidentally
do the absolute worst thing in every every
possible point. But my point is in this
case,
relative risk reduction versus absolute risk reduction. And
it's clear even before this that they had
acknowledged that this was a manipulative tool, and
they did it anyway. And that's his point
about the 100 200 to 100. Like, that's
that's the relative
risk. That's how they lied to you. And
this makes this point clear in case you
didn't understand what he was talking about. And
you have the right to know the potential
benefit of any intervention.
Note that that video is okay. So clearly,
who knows? For example, Pfizer reported that its
vaccine shows a ninety five percent efficacy.
That sounds like it protects you ninety five
percent of the time, right? But that's not
actually what that number means. That ninety five
percent refers to the relative risk reduction, but
it doesn't tell you how much your overall
risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we
need absolute risk reduction. By vaccination.
For that, we need absolute risk reduction. In
the Pfizer trial, eight out of eighteen thousand
one hundred and ninety eight people who were
given the vaccine
developed COVID-nineteen.
In the unvaccinated placebo group, a hundred and
sixty two people got it, which means that
even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting
COVID nineteen was extremely low at zero point
eighty eight percent, which the vaccine then reduced
to zero point zero four percent. So the
net benefit or the absolute risk reduction that
you're being offered with a Pfizer vaccine is
zero point eighty four percent. That ninety five
percent number, that refers to the relative difference
between zero point eighty eight and zero point
zero four percent. That's what they call ninety
five percent relative risk reduction.
And relative risk reduction is well known to
be a misleading number, which is why the
FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead, which
begs the question, how many people would have
chosen to take the COVID nineteen vaccines had
they understood that they offered less than one
percent benefit?
Yeah. Pretty sure,
basically nobody. Right? And that that because there's
there's very few people out there that would
decide to take a dangerous thing because of
political interests.
I mean, at least I'd like to believe
that sounds pretty well, who knows today? But
that's, I think, a very important under understanding,
you know, of why and how that manipulation
was played. Now
Sasha Latapova says, the science with the dollar
sign, which is the, you know, I'm making
a point. I am it's a quote. The
science I'm telling you the science, stupid. It
says, I am sick and tired of the
HHS
still lying about COVID and mRNA being a
matter of science. It's a matter of war.
And what her point is is that this
is a bill bio
a military,
countermeasure.
This and this is operation warp speed. You
can you can and with from the very
beginning, from the moment this started with Mansepsilawi
and warp speed and the pharmaco vigil and
the way that they set this up, this
was an experiment. This was a military countermeasure,
and there's a reason they did it that
way for all the reasons we see with
The UAE and the way this ended up.
They made this happen, and they watched how
it happened, and they act like they're now
you know? I mean, of course, each side
points to the other, and it's just the
way this always works, guys, but it's I
don't think it's working like it used to
in the whole left right paradigm illusion.
But he she says it's a matter of
war, a military attack in on society, which
RFK Junior had no problem recognizing before he
stepped into the position and almost unlimited power
over the issue, the prep per the prep
act prep act. Now it's a case of
sudden amnesia.
She's been calling this out from the beginning,
and people who have principles are not stupid.
You can recognize, like like his support of
the MMR shot. I anybody who's still supporting
that this I mean,
he is a one eighty on some of
his core issues right now. And and, again,
if he tomorrow decides to roll out the
the the right direction and says I was
fooling you to get it done, well, I'll
still criticize the way he did that. But
I don't think that's what's gonna happen
because I think it matters the way it's
done. Now here is
another example. RFK juniors have allegedly handpicked
CDC director nominee,
Susan. I think it's,
Manares.
Here's what she had to say about the
FDA mRNA injections and the science around it.
Thoughts about the safety of mRNA vaccine in
general?
The FDA has,
in the production of the COVID nineteen vaccine,
had approved the mRNA
vaccines as as safe and had demonstrated efficacy
associated with them. Oh oh, you mean you
mean the science that he just told you
was faulty?
Okay. Glad we're on the same page. So
you would not be prejudiced from the get
go against such a platform, such a vaccine
built upon a platform, whether it's for COVID,
flu,
for Lyme disease, or anything else?
Yeah. Before she answers, you know, like like
the Stargate platform. Right? Like Stargate?
Stargate?
Right? Like,
his HHS universal flu platform and, you know,
all the things they're currently working on. Just
so you understand, that's not a hypothetical. They're
already being done by the people that act
like they're skeptical of it.
But,
I I have no a priori or prejudice
against form such a vaccine built upon a
platform, whether it's for COVID, flu,
for Lyme disease, or anything else? That is
what I I have no a priori or
prejudice against mRNA,
platform or any other,
approach that is being taken to develop vaccines.
And that is why we have
safety and and efficacy standards that the FDA
puts in place for any of these medical
product trials. Yeah. Which they spectacularly failed on.
And if you or you could call deliberately
so from fail.
Pretty clear many of these choices were not
by accident.
But that you realize she's pointing to the
process that we all went through. That the
vast majority of people left and right seem
to be aware we relied to about, that
they're all seem to be even admitting right
now, including RFK junior, but this is her
testimony.
Seems pretty strange. To ensure that anything that
is being developed, we can have the confidence
that we can put it in ourselves and
our children, our families. So so then you
as the CDC director,
children,
our
families. So so then you, as the CDC
director, responsible for
setting the ACIP
agenda,
would not shrink from,
the recommendation of such a vaccine.
Would you also recommend that the 17 members
be constituted
with those who actually have experience
with mRNA research
and could know both sides of the safety
discussion?
Yeah. We absolutely need high, you know, highly
trained scientists and and medical profession professionals to
be able to participate in the ACIP meeting.
If they don't have deep technical knowledge in
mRNA, they have to be able to understand
complicated scientific information,
and they have to have the temerity to
ask questions to make sure that they have
clarity of understanding of information that is being
presented to them. Yeah. Yeah. You know, technical
information and technical knowledge and know how is
super important.
Also, honesty and integrity and principles. You know,
just throwing it out there. Just because they
know what they're talking about is never a
good indication that they're gonna care about the
outcome or the information or the you know,
that it's done the way we want it
to be done. Now I wanna make clear,
I'm not suggesting any way that I know
this person is just dishonest. I don't know
that. Very just as likely out there. Well,
I shouldn't say just as likely. You know?
Look. We all know how obvious this information
is. That's not to say that there's people
she could very well believe what she's saying.
I just wanna be objective about that, make
it clear that we shouldn't assume that it's
that, you know, these people are all choosing
to do so. You know? That's important to
think about. Don't look that's that's about your
integrity and your principles. Don't just assume, like,
the ridiculous mainstream alternate media does. Prove it.
Okay? But and until then, we don't know
for sure. That's just being honest. So my
point though is that what she's pointing to,
what she just said contradict what RFK said.
So we have to be honest about what
that shows us.
Now here is
oh, the next one here. This is
Josh, champagne Joshi.
Mega thread on Susan
Menares,
RFK Jr's handpicked candidate to run the CDC.
Not a doctor,
not a frontline scientist. She's she is a
biotech
insider.
Yeah. Because that's where the world is going.
Right? Isn't or at least that's what they
tell you or they actually what they don't
tell you and they force it in without
with them all telling you what you wanna
hear.
She's a biotech insider who spent twenty years
building public private partnerships, you know, like the
World Economic Forum,
between the Fed and Big Pharma. Right? So
you can't FOIA. You can't see what's going
on. That's not what we all ask for.
It confirmed if confirmed, she'd be the first
CDC director without a medical degree in seventy
plus years.
Now, you know, look, that doesn't necessarily worry
me. Like, if if it was if that
was the only thing, I'd say, okay. I'm
willing to give her a chance seeing as
how, as I just said, that's not necessarily
the only thing that matters, especially if you're
the one directing and you have a lot
of people beneath you that are the ones
with the technical knowledge. But it does matter.
It's a it's an interesting deviation. I almost
feel like that's a way to make it
seem like, you know, the people that wanna
support anything but the normal and act like
that means it's good will just go, yay.
It's not a doctor. Well, it's not I
mean, that seems like an odd decision with
everything else we're talking about. But not a
doctor being a biotech I mean, you see
the direction it's going in, and it gets
it gets more interesting. She spent her career
not regulating industry, but helping it navigate and
exploit the federal health bureaucracy.
It says she's been I realized this is
Josh's research on it. Look it up for
yourself, but these all the links are here
as usual.
She's been embedded with Ed BARDA, DHS, n
c NSC, ARPA h, and now she's poised
to lead the CDC.
She earned her PhD in microbiology and immunology
from the University of Wisconsin Madison in 2003
where her dissertation research focused on developing technology
to prevent, diagnose, and treat infectious diseases, particularly
those affecting low and middle income families
or country. Excuse me.
And she go he says, here's where oh,
wait. Great. Great. Twitter does this to me
every time. In 02/2015,
article from AAAS provides a list of alumni
that that have went on to work at
the White House Office of Science and Technology
Policy, which was established by Congress.
You and this is the point where where
it here's where it gets interesting, he points
out. At BARDA, HHS, she helped stand up
project BioShield,
funneling billions.
See? Stupid platform. Here we go. Funneling billions
into pharmaceutical countermeasures.
That that's the one we were just the
medical the military bio medical countermeasures is the
main point. For theoretical
CBRN
chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear threats. BARDA stands for
biomedical advanced research and development authority. It's basically
DARPA for the bio biomedical field.
Oh, they really overlap to be quite clear.
Project BioShield is the same program that gave
us the those shady COVID vaccine contracts.
The same one that built the pandemic industrial
complex.
Brief background of the project BioShield you can
read for yourself. It's a great thread you
should read through in-depth. Operation Warp Speed twenty
twenty used BARDA as its funding hub, deploying
over $2,000,000,000
to vaccine developers, including Moderna as AstraZeneca,
you know, under under Trump's administration.
BARDA's internal system, Beam, collected expansive data from
vaccine manufacturers and production, logistics, distribution,
you know, collecting of data as well. Senior
BARDA official,
Manares, was part of the team empowering the
system, allocating billions to private firms, and navigating
accelerated pathways. These early choices enabled
there. Didn't do it that time. Enabled the
rapid COVID contracts later executed under Operation Warp
Speed. Now, again, you could argue that she
believes in all this, that she thinks this
is the path to take. We really shouldn't
just jump the gun and assume what her
intentions are. But the point is to recognize
that from your for Miles, my perspective, and
I would argue from people under Maha, that
this is not the direction that they expected.
Maybe you disagree. Point it out. It's a
great thread. Check it out. Give him a
follow.
Now here under that same post,
chief nerd, he also points this out, Josh
Walco, Champagne Joshi. He says, I'll just leave
this here.
Here
is the new nominee,
Susan Manares, on DARPA TV, of course, discussing
how AI will accelerate better health outcomes for
all of us.
Now, again, I most of them actually probably
believe that. That's where the world that's where
the direction is being forced, in my opinion.
So thinking about the direction, this seems to
be biotech, AI.
That that is what everyone's that's that's everything
for them right now. So I think that's
why she's being chosen.
Here, Taylor Hudak points out to bring it
to that AI point back to the interview
as well.
The she says this is so bad. I
agree.
Uriel
Ariel, maybe? Cohen?
Not familiar with this account, but I follow
it because of this. I think it's a
great kind of put together information. Says secretary
Kennedy says that the FDA is going to
accelerate drug approvals with AI by skipping animal
trials. I'll play the clip for you. Again,
is
how is that what we asked for? It's
not, guys. This is this is the the
efficiency
that you thought was gonna come through due
diligence and, you know, research. No. No. It's
gonna be AI. Right? And we're just every
other thing we're seeing is like this.
Skipping animal trials was exactly how we ended
up in the first place with the damage
the early or at least the claims, anyway.
Again, my point is that I think a
lot of this was deliberate. But the early
aspect we realized when they skipped those animal
trials, that is where they would have picked
up on the signals that showed us a
lot of the things that were happening.
Everybody on us was saying that. And now
we look back and go, oh, now we
see it. Yeah. We would have caught it.
I think that was a choice.
Here, same thing.
Maybe AI will be more diligent. Maybe it'll
find more. Maybe not, though, or maybe it
can be used to hide things because these
people are dictating, controlling, using these tools.
He says, I've watched the entire Tucker Carlson
interview with RFK Junior. I was already familiar
with most of the information presented there. RFK
Junior has been repeating this info for a
while now. He says, however, the short clip
that I extracted is my take from it,
and it is extremely concerning,
especially coming from Maha.
Quote, even that system is antiquated
because we have access to AI. We are
creating here at HHS an AI
revolution.
Don't think that was the you know, of
course, you get the people out there. They're
gonna say, we all voted for this even
though this wasn't even really brought up in
the context of, you know, happening like this.
Everything they say is
framed as this is what we voted for
from the people that want everyone else to
think that. It's not what's going on. And
he goes he has a whole thread here.
I'm gonna play the clip for you. You
can check it out for yourself.
We're going to absolutely change theirs, and we're
gonna make it we're we're going to create
either in within theirs.
Okay. The only way I can make sense
of this
I mean, actually, I don't even know how
this makes sense because it's it's the video.
I shouldn't go into it now, but I'm
just interested. The clip the video is okay
on my side when I play it on
my computer. The last one was okay.
The only difference is so I downloaded these
today versus one that I've had forever.
So I just don't know how that makes
sense. How can they be okay on my
end, but only the newer videos I downloaded
are having that issue versus the old ones?
Seems like a specifically applied problem. That's just
very strange to me. I don't know. Let
me know if you think there's anything to
it.
Or,
supplementary to VAERS, a system that actually works.
Oh, and VAERS works, by the way, exactly
the way it's designed to work. They just
lied to everybody about what that was. It
is a signal system. It was never designed
to prove anything. They knew that. They lied
about it. He knows that. He said that
when he said that before more than once.
Here we are again with more new information
from somebody who already has opinion stated before.
It was in theirs
or, supplementary
to theirs, a system that actually works.
Oh, and, you know, that
right now,
even that system is antiquated because we have
access to AI. And one of the you
know, we are creating here at HHS an
AI revolution.
We've been able to attract the the top
people from Silicon Valley, people who've walked away
from billion dollar businesses.
And they don't want prestige, they don't want
position, they don't want power, they wanna change.
They wanna make the system work.
And we're we're gonna,
we are at the cutting edge of of
AI. We're implementing it in all of our
departments. At FDA, we're we're accelerating
drug approvals,
so that you don't need to use primates
or even animal models. You can, you know,
you can do the drug approvals very, very
quickly with
Since this is something people are pointing out
in the chat as well, I wanna clarify.
And I've made this clear before. I I
don't support animal trials in general. I think
it's a horrifying thing to put animals through.
My point though is not about my
desire for the new direction, but more so
I mean, frankly, I don't think any of
this should be happening in an entire sense.
But my point is that the what we
understand, like, from their perspective and what we're
told about the process is that that's how
they end up finding those things. Not that
I'm saying we should do them, as much
as that may sound contradictory.
I'm saying that if I had a choice,
I wouldn't be none of these things would
probably even exist.
The point is that, ultimately,
that process and the way they do that
is where a lot of these signals come
up using AI can easily be manipulated. But
the point in the chat is, which I
agree with, animal trials are also very easily
manipulated, or all or all of these are.
My point is that the AI is something
that becomes very difficult to, like, walk back
and verify. But the trial, at the very
least, human or otherwise,
they at least have some level of data
they put out. There's real people involved. Like,
there's ways to eventually trip them up and
find the mistakes. With AI, I'm arguing that's
gonna become near impossible to find out with,
without, like, newer level investigatory tools, which most
of us probably don't know how to use.
So I just think that's important to point
out. But to clarify about the animal trials
point, I you know, you know my opinion.
I'm a very half the time, I care
more about animals than anything else, you know,
in the people in the world that you
know, like, my dog, for example, is something
that is very important to me. And it's
it's a I find that people that don't
see animals as, you know,
des deserving as just as much
compassion and and, you know, everything as people,
I find that to be a hard thing
to understand. Are people that treat animals like
things they can buy and discard? That tells
me a lot about the kind of person
they are. Just on a side note.
AI.
To use primates or even animal models, you
can, you know, you can do the drug
approvals very, very quickly with AI.
And we're also implementing a CMS that detect
waste, abuse, and fraud,
which is it's extraordinary
at that.
But we're also gonna, you know, use it
on the Very quick note, detecting fraud and
these kind of things. It's interesting that I'm
seeing a lot of these overlaps
with you know, like, we're gonna get to
the deportation point and Atlas, which we'll talk
about, which is another software program that I've
I'm very suspicious is overlap in some way
with some of these other groups we're talking
about, but I'm not gonna make that assumption
without more with evidence to back it up.
But it's I I feel like there's something
there that I can't find.
But the point is that there's all of
these different things. That that one's for deportation
in regard to, you know, a a an
AI system that essentially can decide whether or
not you have something they can use to
remove your US citizenship as a naturalized citizen.
We just talked about that last show. It's
a horrifying reality, and it is coming. And
even Trump said point blank that both US
Americans born here and naturalized are people he's
considering if you're a criminal to get out
of the country. My point, though, is he's
talking about another AI overlap that's detecting fraud.
I'm feeling like there's probably something more to
these different tools that are being used more
than just finding fraud, more so like a
controlling structure
of the you know, like, in regard to
the flow of information.
Right? How we see what there's presented versus
what's actually there. All these things we have
to consider today. Because
what like I just said with the first
part of AI and the trials. Like, there
I there are point at which like, with,
like, a deep fake kind of point where
it's very difficult for most people to be
able to discern the difference between something they
manufactured versus something that was organically created.
That's that's why I'm worried about where this
all goes in a in a lot of
different facets.
At CDC,
and and and throughout our system,
to look at the metadata that we have
and be able to make really good
decisions about interventions. For example,
if you look at the population as a
whole and say, okay. We're using three different
diabetes drugs
or five different statin drugs or all these
SSRIs
and others,
You can then look drug by drug, and
you can tell on the population whether it's
working or not and which one is giving
you the best bang for the buck, which
one has the most side effects.
We have a potential now to use AI
AI in ways that are gonna revolutionize medicine.
Something we've been predicting, haven't we?
With, I mean, many different conversations.
I mean, now let me see if I
can even grab this one.
What was it?
Well, funny enough, this is my coverage of
the Stargate thing. But I interviewed with George
Webb, and one of them was about AI
created medicine.
Yeah. And he's this was a discussion from
a long time ago.
But we'll come back to that. I agree
with what he's talking about here. He said
there's a lot to unpack, short clips, so
keep reading the thread. So go through and
check it out if you wanna see his
thoughts on it. I just think what's important
to understand is that just like we're worried
about, it's an AI drug that you know,
it's where they're going with all of this.
And if we if we can't see by
now how easy these things are to manipulate
from nefarious characters, whether from another country or
within, I just I don't know what else
to show you. It's obvious that these things
are a dangerous step at the very least
with where our society is right now.
Now RFK Jr says Fauci is likely liable
for the COVID nineteen pandemic in the same
interview.
Health and human services secretary RFK Jr says
the former White House coronavirus
adviser, Anthony Fauci,
likely
played a large role in the creation of
the SARS CoV-two and
called for an investigatory commission into The United
States' involvement in the origins of the COVID
nineteen pandemic. Now realize he's talking specifically about
the idea that Fauci was had a hand
in, like, creating
what they say killed everybody. And and realize,
I think I think the majority of people
have the mind right now that this is
not even what we're actually dealing with. Right?
That this is a a manipulated
might like, whether we had something novel or
not, that it was not actually the real
issue. Danny Rancu and plenty of others have
been putting out peer reviewed studies that show
you that the it adds up. The point,
though, is that whether or not you think
it even existed is one side of it.
The other is you're you're not talking about
the
actions taken through the the illusion of it
all, you know, lockdowns and everything else that
happened, but rather the origins of it that
they everyone wants to pretend, you know, from
the one side of the paradigm that it
was just China, and that was it.
And now you're kind of work you know,
folding and pouchy. Well, I don't know how
in the world you could include him
and not in and not understand that that
without question includes Donald Trump.
I mean, even are are we of the
mind that he somehow was, like, doing this
behind Trump's back the whole time? I certainly
wouldn't surprise me, but then Trump gives him
a medal at the end or, you know,
everything is it doesn't add up.
And as you go through, it'll make that
more clear. Kennedy, it says in an interview
with talk with Tucker Carlson published Monday, said
that Fauci, in his role as director of
the NIA or NIAID,
founded potentially dangerous research at the University of
Virology. You know, you mean, like, Trump is
continuing to do right now. Like and let's
not forget that. Actually, I'll just grab that
one too. See if that can pop up.
Yep.
Here's the other one. Gain of function head
fake. We just talked about this. I I
honestly think that most people in the in
the conservative side of this still don't even
realize that they were lied to about that.
Gain of function head fake because they came
out. This was on 05/09/2025.
And they claimed I think I might even
have I don't wanna search too long. The
it doesn't stand out to me. But the
white the White House, you know, posting, and
it's very clear, black and white.
They're gonna become the leaders.
What the first says that they're gonna stop
the most dangerous gain of function,
and then very clearly continue the ones they
deem to be acceptable. So I guess we'll
just trust that they're the one they're they're
doing the not dangerous ones, whatever that means,
to still gain of function, and that they're
gonna become the leader in the world in
that type of gain of function. And that
somehow got reported as their ending gain of
function by all the people we always point
out who lie to you for partisan reasons.
They they're lying to you. And so realize
that the gain of function process and the
gain of function research is still happening right
now. And then going back to the the
twenty twenty point forward, I proved it to
you then as well with their own documentation
that when he when Trump pulled the funding
for Wuhan and made a big statement about
it, there were other labs in in China
that were at the same moment getting funding
from the US government for that kind of
research. And as you all know, it continued
in a lot of other ways as well.
So I think it's very dishonest.
Very dishonest to to,
you know, basically say, fund the potential dangerous
research. We know he did. But not him
alone, but the US government and multiple administrations,
which includes Trump, includes all of them. But
my point is Trump is the one that
gets kind of omitted from this conversation. It's
all of them.
At Wuhan in China, he says that
intelligence agencies have assessed could have sparked the
COVID pandemic.
Carlson specifically asked Kennedy why former why Joe
Biden issued a full preemptive pardon for Fauci
on his last day in the White House,
which I think is insane that you could
pardon someone for
unknown things. I actually don't think that even
applies quite frankly, but my point is that
I thought that was done to avoid Trump
doing it
because that would make sense to people. And
so now it's gonna act like, oh, our
heads are died. You know, he's had got
a pardon. Even though it's not what they're
saying, like, I'm willing to bet you anything
that despite this statement, despite anything else, that
that will never come to pass because how
do you go after this without including Trump?
And how Trump would be complicit at the
very least as the leader on that was
supposed to be overseeing all of this. Like,
at best, he turns out to look like
a fool.
At worst, he's complicit, which I think we
all know is the reality. And so here,
this won't go to pass it won't come
to pass because it's not something that they
want at the end of the day. But
they want you to think maybe and then
get distracted by 17 other things that happened
tomorrow.
It says
oh, and then the pardon was the point.
And let's realize that Trump has pardoned plenty
of other people in different dynamics that are
I mean, not as not Fauci in the
COVID nineteen illusion, but people that were criminals
just because they were part of it on
his side. And it says,
quote, I would be speculating,
but I think that he had a lot
of liability on creating coronavirus.
He was funding precisely that research, and he
was giving them the technology. He was? Are
we look. Yes. Fauci is a central player
in this, but he was an underling to
the people who were making these decisions, guys.
And as much as they really try to
make the case that he was the one
dictating all of it,
you can see and prove at the very
least the check off, the involvement of the
executive branch the entire time.
And so it it's just dishonest to act
like it's just him. And this is this
is an attempt to kind of rewrite, reframe
the story as we're trying to get to
the bottom of it, but really it's only
Fauci. And we'll just x we'll just execute
this in the court of public opinion and
leave it alone and let you feel like
we did our job. How it tends to
go. Meanwhile, the two party illusion continues
on. Former president,
former, president Obama put a moratorium on gain
of function in 2014
following potentially dangerous experiments involving highly lethal avian
influenza
earlier that decade. The moratorium lasted for three
years ending in 2017.
Now realize, as we all know and we
proved on the show that they did not
stop in 02/2014. It didn't. Very easy to
prove. They they kept doing it. And just
like they always do under some different name
or different or just do it anyway. But
it says Biden's pardon for Fauci's preemptively waived
him or Fauci pardon for Fauci preemptively waived
him of liability for any crimes committed between
2014 and 2024. Again, I don't see how
that's legal.
Overlapping with the Obama era moratorium and the
start of the pandemic.
Okay. But also in the midst of that
is Trump's administration, his involvement in all of
that. My point is that if you listen,
they this seems to be his weird tap
dance around that obvious point. Kennedy also referenced
the NIAID
funded research by University of North Carolina University
or the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill,
scient and scientist Ralph Barrick, who, before the
pandemic, created the technology to conceal whether or
not a pathogen had been genetically manipulated in
a lab. He's also the one that we
talked about with doctor David Martin and plenty
of others that was working on coronavirus,
in myocarditis
inducing coronavirus on rabbits in the nineties. He
worked on self spreading coronavirus versions in the
labs or in the court case of China.
All All this is publicly covered. We covered
it on this show.
How that's not immediately relevant? I mean, it
is, and we all know that, but the
game becomes it's just this group and this
one thing and maybe China alone.
It's amazing when people can convince themselves of
if it's partisanly driven, partisan driven. When Carlson
asked if Fauci could ever be prosecuted or
otherwise held accountable for funding dangerous research, Kennedy
said that the only way forward would be
to have a nationwide truth commission, and here
we go. JFK and nine eleven and COVID
nineteen. How do those usually go for us?
They don't.
It's a big, you know,
dog and pony show. There's no real outcome.
There's a bunch of grandstanding
and narratives and what what happens? We and
and realize the past examples of these, like
nine eleven, like JFK,
even at the time, the vast majority of
Americans did not believe the Warren Commission was
correct. Same with the nine eleven discussion. Same
with COVID nineteen for that matter. They don't
buy it, guys, because there's so many holes
in it. It's absurd.
So let's do it again, apparently. I just
this is just an exercise of futility, in
my opinion. And it says in those cases,
what happens is you have, in the truth
commission, a commission that hears testimony
on what exactly happened. And anybody who comes
and volunteers to testify truthfully is then given
immunity for prosecution. Oh, great. So they can
come in and just admit they did something
wrong and they just are immune from prosecution?
That doesn't seem like that makes sense, but
it says just so the public knows who
did what.
Quote, people who are called and don't take
the deal, who perjured themselves, then they can
be prosecuted
criminally. I mean, it just seems like a
pretty weird way to make that to basically
you
could
there's ways you could manipulate that. My my
point
is that why wouldn't they all step forward
and lay out the narrative they want you
to think? How would you prove them otherwise
if there's no evidence already put forward? And
on top of that, if they wanted to
come forward and say, yes. I did that,
isn't he saying right there that they're immune
for prosecution?
I don't get how this makes sense. Is
it about knowing or is it about keep
holding people accountable? Because we already know what
happened.
He says he's the only one within the
admin the Trump administration oh, excuse me. He
said he's not the only one within Trump
administration's health department who's dubious of the new
vaccine technology.
Well, forgive me if that rings hollow, seeing
as how
you
have the
self amplifying
r it's the what? R a r c
t two three zero four pandemic influenza,
a a five n one mRNA shot. Yeah.
That's happening April 10. That this is very
real and still going, and they absolutely endorse
this. Or just the Stargate platform in general
is an entire platform direction for cancer and
other things based on AI, based on mRNA
shots. I mean, this is how can you
even for a moment act like you're skeptical?
This is not like this is like the
platform starting point. This is exactly if you
think this is a problem, they took the
problem and are standing on it to make
these things go forward. The platform, and I'll
include that as well.
The platform
itself.
Of course. Oh, there it goes. Because, of
course, it doesn't pop up now. In a
peer reviewed study, by the way, which is
included as always in the show notes, study
finds the mRNA platform itself
is driving myocarditis. Now not the only thing.
There's other factors, like all of it for
that matter, lipid nanoparticles and mRNA and the
spike protein. The point is that this the
platform itself was causing these problems. The study
found many, in fact, And so they're creating
the same problem. But just in a general
sense for them to say we're dubious of
this and then roll out mRNA shots based
on the same faulty science, kinda rings hollow,
doesn't it?
Or the next generation universal flu platform. It's
the same thing.
Just so generally the point, guys,
we're being misled.
It's time for us to call this out,
and I do see already people doing that
in a large sense in the partisan field.
Now in another angle of health that I
do think is just very strange and worthy
of discussion,
This is from CBS News. Billions of flies
to be dumped out of planes in an
effort to fight flesh eating maggot known as
man eater. This is posted today.
Just seemed
crazy.
I just don't understand how I mean, I
understand why this happens. We've already seen this
kind of, in my opinion, broken logic with
mosquitoes, with all sorts of different things. With,
re, you know, like, edible vaccines they dump
for animals, for foxes, and it just everything
they're doing like, this stuff is,
in my opinion, consistently
shown to be
the benefits don't outweigh the risks. That what
they're doing with these things cause far more
damage, but it doesn't ultimately
stop
in any of them. And that makes you
wonder whether it's about something else. And so
I just wanna pose that thought. Let's read
through the what we can prove,
and then just consider
what other agendas might be there or ask
ourselves what might happen if you release a
billion flies
over a certain population.
Now it says the US government is preparing
to breed billions of flies,
dump them out of airplanes over Mexico and
Southern Texas to fight a flesh eating maggot.
That sounds like the plot of a horror
movie, but it's part of the government's plans
for protecting The US
from a bug that could devastate its beef
industry. You know? And then peep sure people
might consider that maybe that's the point. Maybe
it's manufactured. Can question everything. Don't assume without
facts. Decimated wildlife decimate wildlife and even kill
household pets. This weird science has worked well
before. Now what they're talking about is the
same thing we keep hearing about mosquitoes or
anything. They're they're they're taking these flies, manufacturing
sterile flies with whatever tech they're using to
manipulate their genetics and putting them out in
the open, hoping that they breed, and then
claiming that's gonna reduce the population. But yet
they're here, and they've been doing this since
the fifties. But, you know, consider for yourself.
Obviously, the point is if you read into
it that this was something they claim was
a success and there was a breakdown at
the Daring Gap. And, ultimately, they think it
was about people trafficking, you know, secretly cattle
across lines, and that brought them over. I
mean, there's all I've read a bunch about
it today about what,
you know, they think might have caused the
resurgence of this.
But, you know, my opinion is as always,
these things are either, you know, cut like
like, for example, if you look at, like,
algae blooms, I used to talk about this
quite a bit where they have these random
algae blooms. Oh, it's a natural thing. No.
No. It can be, but not like that.
When you look into it, what it turns
out, oh, yeah. But it's also this runoff
from this massive plant right here that causes
these random blooms that are super
toxic. The reality is that it the human
influence on the environment causes all sorts of
crazy things, especially when we're not being respectful
of the environment around us. And the reality
is that they can do these things by
all sorts of, like, corporate things or government
actions by taking down forests and, you know,
and then cause these side effects and then
deal with other ways that cause more problems
or use their problem to initiate a secret
agenda within that. All those things are possible
to consider.
You know? But, in a large sense, though,
you know, I do think that we are
dealing with the type of people that even
when they're trying to help you seem to
not. I mean, that's that same old thing.
The most alarming thing you can hear is
I'm the government, and I'm here to help.
But yet we still all pretend like their
government's going to be there when it suits
our partisan interest or something seems to do.
The targeted pest is a flesh eating larva,
larva of the new world's screw fly or
screw worm fly. So it's the maggot
or the the fly rather of the excuse
me, the screw worm fly and that they
have the maggots that are
the problem in this. Like, the maggot the
the so the larva of the flies are
what are basically
infesting
animals and eating the meat of, you know,
apparently live animals.
The US Department of Agriculture plans to ramp
up the breeding and distribution of adult male
flies,
sterilizing them with radiation before releasing them. Now
one of the biggest things I'll point out
in a second about the supposed GMO mosquito
effort to do the same thing
backfired or, you know, backfired where it ended
up increasing the population.
It like, just like the GMO food experiment
decreased
food or increased food insecurity.
But then we let them run out the
GMO vaccine game with Bill Gates involved too.
Just like, they just fail and fail and
fail right into success apparently or just gaining
from it. The point here is that we've
seen this before where because of either accidents
or deliberate, you know, deliberate
manipulation,
that the actual prop what they did actually
increase the problem, which then ramps up their
efforts to spray, which then causes more dialysis.
It's like the circle of manipulation, which causes
to get more sick. So my point is
if we've seen that before, we should wonder
whether the same, you know,
process is even going to be successful. It
says they mate with females in the wild,
and the eggs laid by the females aren't
fertilized and don't hatch.
They are fewer larva. Over time, the fly
dog population dies out. But, you know, if
that was the case, then how you know,
it just feels like
this excuse me. The the logic around how
this works has tried and failed many times
in different fields in the past.
The USDA expects a new screw worm fly
factory to be up and running in Southern
Mexico by July 2026. The USDA
in Mexico.
That seems interesting to me. At the very
least, you know, they what's her name?
Clotenbaum? I forget her last name. The president
of Mexico
has been calling out stuff in the US
government for a while and pushed back on
the GMO corn thing that Derek and I
talked about, what to try to force on
her. And yet, nonetheless, they allow the USDA
to just build factories in the middle of
Mexico. Like, just, you know, question everything, especially
whether or not there's more coordination amongst these
things than we realize. It plans to open
a fly distribution center in Southern Texas also
by the end of the year so that
it can import, distribute flies, and distribute flies
from Panama if necessary. Now does Texas get
a say in this? Do the people of
Texas get to say, I don't want you
releasing a billion flies over our family?
Probably not.
Now it says, the rest of the beef
industry, a thousand pound bovine can be dead
ferment in two weeks.
And Michael Bailey, the president-elect of the American
Veterinary Medicine Association, said, vet veterinarians
have effective treatments for infested animals,
but an infestation can still be unpleasant
and cripple the animal with pain.
Oh, okay. So they don't have any side
effect? I mean, the way that reads is
they it's a painful thing that they can
recover from that doesn't cripple them. It cripples
them with pain.
So we're releasing a billion flies to stop
something that can be treated already?
It doesn't end up hurting the animal? I
mean, I that seems like an interesting thing.
Right? Like, obviously, this is a gross thing,
and and that if you don't catch it
in time, clearly, they can they can die
within weeks. But if you're watching your animals
and you have a way to treat them,
I don't get the logic of playing god
with a bunch of GMO flies, and, you
know, it just feels like a rationale to
do something they probably already wanna mess with.
Just my personal opinion. The numbers need to
be large enough that females in the wild
can't help but hook up with the sterile
females remaining. Seems like an assumption, quite frankly.
Alarmed about the flies are, I guess, more
so a a hope.
Alarmed about the flies' migration north. The US
temporarily
closed its southern border in May to import
live cattle, horses, and bison
to
in May to oh, sorry. I I know
I read it wrong because I I read
it earlier.
Our alarm about the flies migration north, The
US temporarily closed its southern border in May
to imports. So they closed the imports of
cattle, horses, and bison, and it because they're
worried arguably that it wouldn't be it'll come
through on that. And it won't be fully
open again until at least until mid September.
I just interest find it interesting that it
overlaps with closing the border.
You know, just pointing out what's what I
see. But female flies can lay their eggs
and wounds on any warm blooded animal, and
that includes humans.
Interesting. Gross.
Another point to make though about this part
is, you know, I get the sense with
the mosquito point too that there's more than
just, you know, mistakes or that
it's possible that these things can sense the
difference or avoid you know, I wonder whether
or not there's a point at which they
end up avoiding
the different version of these things that are
in their community, and that's why it doesn't
work. Because it again, I'll show you in
a second. These past examples of mosquitoes have
failed.
Raising hundreds of millions of flies. Yuck. Dropping
flies from the air can be dangerous.
That's what it says. Risks associated.
Right? Okay.
Dropping flies from the air can get you
sick, can infest your animals, can cause all
sorts of diseases. No. No. No. It can
be dangerous because a plane can crash.
That's actually what it says. And trust me,
there's no other argument about any kind of
other health overlaps. It could be dangerous because
last month the plane crashed while they were
dumping them on people. I just thought that
was funny. So no mention of what the
possible overlaps can be. So let me show
you what I see in this.
First of all, I just looked this up,
and it this is one of the ones
that stood out to me. It was called
flies and disease. This is part two, in
fact. It says involvement in the transmission
of disease agents, which is the point that
we're gonna get into, and I'll show you
the actual the points in this book. The
it says the exhaustive evaluation of fly involvement
is discussing what the book does.
In in the exhaustive evaluation of fly involvement
in more than 60 human and animal diseases
is drawn against a backdrop that gives careful
balance to other modes of dissemination.
So here's what some of here are well,
this is the actual downloaded document, which you
can read for yourself. Took me a second
to find it. Mainly points out that chapter
three and four are what relates to the
z, and you can read it for yourself.
I just wanna include those for you. Here
is one of the points I wanted to
show you. It just simply and you can
read through this. It's fascinating, actually. It says,
in the vast majority of more than 60
diseases presented within this article, the evidence for
fly involvement is unmistakable.
I just wanna make it very clear that
the science shows that flies
lead to disease
in among other things. Right? That's important. So
I just wanna lay that out there as
we're potentially dumping a billion flies over people
in Texas, very hot, right, which is just
more it's just perfectly ripe for disease and,
you know, whatever else kind of you know,
for coming from a food side of the
thing. You know, moisture, temperature,
what you know, plenty of those are the
things that add perfect you know, can create
perfect,
you know, conditions for the growth of of
bacteria,
pathogens.
So here is a study from BMC Public
Health, a systematic review of human pathogens carried
by the housefly. Now the housefly is a
specific fly, but the general point about that
book we showed you in other discussions are
about flies in general. It's more so about
the landing on things and carrying it around
as I understand it, but the specific flies
have different different
aspects that cause more or less, but it's
really about that overlap.
Here's a oh, and this this is the
point I wanna connect it with. Just thinking
about this discussion. Right? Not necessarily vaccinating, but
the idea of how they use animals. Ticks,
for example, which I should have grabbed that
to start. It's actually a good overlap. The,
let's see.
Yeah. There it is. This true stream medium,
which by the way, I get looks like
they're they're working on a new documentary for
next year, which you check out. The official
ignored connection between Lyme disease and Plum Island.
This is watch this video and you will
walk away. I mean, the evidence is shockingly
clear. In fact, to the point to where
they even shut down the area because of
their experiment, the point is the US government
weaponized ticks to spread disease as a bioweapon
on Plum Island right across from New York,
and they basically shut it down. They're signed
everywhere. Don't come in here. Ticks everywhere. It's
just the this is what they've done over
the years. You could prove this stuff.
So thinking about that, wonder whether or not
there's more going on here. Now we already
saw this. This is just one of an
endless amount of articles well before this and
after. This is 02/2010.
Researchers turn mosquitoes into flying vaccinators.
It's not a joke. It's legitimately what they
did.
And
everything else as well, which is I think
this article here.
And this is also for a peer reviewed
study. It's science you can read for yourself.
And it's not me making the title. It's
exactly what it was reporting, that a deployable
mosquito technology, like the GMO one we just
point you to, can execute,
incapacitate,
or vaccinate.
Meaning that it can deploy something that could
kill you, deploy something that could just casually
put you to sleep, or vaccinate you. Now
this overlaps with James Giordano and his information
about, you know, the way they can deploy
these nano, you know,
insect laden dynamics. And he's talked about this
a lot.
All very clear.
So the question becomes,
why would we allow them to keep keep
just dumping these things over us for whatever
reason? Right? With not just this, but just
health in general. But then on top of
that, what else might be going on? Or
I should even include, by the way, these
all these things pop in my
mind. Is that the same one? Oh, yeah.
Okay. There it is.
The idea of compulsory moral more compulsory moral
bio enhancement
should be covert. The simple point is they
argue that if they deem it to be
in the interest of humanity, then if it's
something that they deem is necessary, that they
shouldn't inform you of it. They should just
do it first. And they argue that that
complies with morality and ethics more because it's
helping the world and, you know, not even
considering whether they could just be wrong and
ignoring informed consent and all that. The point
is this is not one of many times
that the US government has put forward the
idea, like and this was 02/2018.
They discussed this around COVID as well. The
idea is that maybe we should just do
it secretly because they don't know any better.
That's how they see you. So all of
this plays into the larger point of whether
or not these things should continue to happen.
And I wanted to include some things as
we wrap this segment just before we get
into the rest of it that I've talked
about in the past. This is why I
mentioned the edible rabies vaccine point. We talked
about this on a show right here. Edible
transmissible
live rabies jabs, air dropped over I I
didn't I didn't wanna call them vaccines, but
it's also not a jab. It's a little
packet. Air dropped over The US. That include
tetracycline.
Tetracycline
was what was
the the responsible factor, which I include right
here.
There was right here.
Oh, there it is.
Tetracycline
was the reason
that these GMO mosquitoes
weren't working. It's right here.
It shows that it was highlighted by a
difference in results seen between a laboratory and
a collaborator. They were getting 15% survival of
the transgenic line. The mosquitoes that were supposed
to be dying off were surviving fifteen percent
of the time. And then when it then
those mated with females,
they became resistant to whatever they were doing.
And the point was that it was had
tetracycline
in the traps they were using, which caused
them to continue to be able to come
become resistant.
And they as far as I could tell,
that hasn't hasn't chopped. Maybe it has, but
it's my last time I looked into this,
they were still doing it, which was baffling
me, and that was the the follow-up was
that these rabies vaccines they were dropping had
tetracycline in them. And you're and so you
have this in the wild where then it
the point is this seems like a coordinated
dynamic.
But this discussion is about how they're dropping
things like this, how they're using mosquitoes for
all sorts of dynamics. And this was just
a video I commented on, US patent, what,
whatever it is, involuntary immunization
on nonlethal toxins like calming agents. And I
just simply posted this out and said, this
is a very real patent.
But it's important to point out that there
is no provable connection to the government, Nordil
Bill Gates, but I covered this in-depth on
September 10 and highlighted below. And this there's
the video I did about this. Here's the
patent itself. Toxic mosquito aerial release system.
The the this is stuff you can easily
prove. That's a patent that very well overlaps
with the concern of how it might be
used for,
you know, bio weapon kind of stuff.
I'll include those shows we talked about. This
one as well, obligatory pesticide spraying in New
York City, GMO mosquitoes and flying vaccinators. Are
they all connected? Sure seems that way. That's
why I include this. And I simply said,
are you aware that the GMO mosquitoes released
in California and Florida, which by the way,
I believe are still happening. That's and it
says right there, experimental use permit
for the for the main one, the O
X five zero three four. But how do
you say it again?
Adesi aegypti
in Florida and California
has been renewed.
That's the point. They renewed their experimental permit
to dump mosquitoes over you that can that
are GMO mosquitoes.
So you're being experimented on. There's really no
way around it, guys, and that seems to
still be the case. I simply said, were
you aware that those mosquitoes were released in
California and Florida and everywhere else are an
ongoing experiment?
Are you okay with that? Considering that these
are provable these there is provable DNA contamination
and that between three to fifteen percent do
not die but get stronger. All backed up
by exactly what we can see here. Study
on DNA spread by genetic, genetically modified mosquitoes
prompts backlash. That's from science.com.
There we are.
And I'll include the one I showed you
earlier. Donald Trump rolls out his AI biomedical
control grid. That's Stargate.
And we'll go on to the next segment.
But, yeah, that something very weird about all
that, and it really worries me that we're
playing it fast and loose with, you know,
just
these people do not seem to care about
the consequences of your life.
But talking about the overlap to this with
AI, which was the ending point, you know,
the reality that this is all whether it's
health and then and more injections or everyone
else, it seems like AI is just the
the, you know, the panacea. For there's everything
they wanna do is AI direction, which is
kinda like we always find with COVID, anything
else. The thing they wanna use to solve
the current problem seems to always be the
same solution despite the problem, which means
they're either manufacturing problems to meet that solution
or applying that solution to anything they come
across whether or not it actually solves the
problem. But on the AI point of technocracy,
just a thought points out, and I just
wanna include this in some points really quickly,
because we've talked about this quite a lot.
She goes, and guess what? It's not new,
and it's being used constantly and without your
consent to use Wi Fi or your echo
devices and whatever else
to detect motion in your home.
And that's not even the half of it.
We've already talked about this. We've covered this
in World Economic Forum discussions,
other other,
I think it was a DARPA related, like,
symposium
where they they could they'll point blank tell
you that they can use your WiFi, the
WiFi signal to three d map your entire
room.
And now it's just starting to slowly come
out. Hey, guess what? Pay 999 and we'll
detect motion in your house. Well, how do
you think they can do that? You didn't
upload anything new. You don't have a new
device. They're just telling you they can do
that.
We need to start paying attention to where
this is and get these things the hell
out of your house.
Now,
this one I thought was fascinating. Just just
in a general direction of where this goes
and because you can't miss the obvious overlap
to what this is,
here's the actual article. It's called this is
from hackster.io
from yesterday.
It's it's empower yourself is the title. And
it says, with power on touch, you never
need to replace a battery again because
it turns you into a wireless power source.
I mean, is this not the stuff of
dystopian nightmares that we've talked about? Not just
for The Matrix guys. Like, the idea that
you become the power source for some kind
of technocratic infrastructure. Because it's like every single
thing we've been free worrying about, to be
clear,
seems to be beginning to happen.
It's crazy.
Wearable
power transmitter. Yeah. Wearables. Isn't that what RFK
Jr. Just really told you was the was
the future?
Well, I simply said the the same thing.
With power on touch, you never need to
replace a battery again because it turns you
into the power, and I simply showed the
the matrix thing coming out. And this person
just points out his old comment where it
says, this is not
commonly known that your sweat glands can act
as,
helical
antennas.
Wearables will be implanted, but won't be necessary.
And this is just an interesting study. DNA,
fractal antenna, and electromagnetic
fields.
Interesting, isn't it? Clearly, there's more going on
or it can be. And I think this
is what they see.
Now an overlap to that, as Sensor Scepter
also pointed out, who else caught during that
interview we're pointing to that Tucker Carlson has
partnered with Casey Means company,
Levels?
Well,
Levels, if you look into it, is all
about wearables. Primarily
glucose tracking, but it's about wearables. That's the
whole point of it. And RFK just told
us that was the plan. Levels raised $12,000,000
in seed funding from Andreessen Horowitz. You know,
Mark Marc Andreessen, the the very one of
the many in this kind of olig oligarchal
circle that seems to be running the country
right now, as well as Marc Randolph, cofounder
and first CEO of Netflix,
Dick Costello, former CEO of Twitter, and Michael
Arling Arrington, founder of TechCrunch.
Interesting.
So to me, my my point is simply
that I find it interesting that this like,
this is not some outside the norm, outside
the mainstream entity. This is you're tapped in
right to the main point. Doesn't mean he's
dishonest. Doesn't mean he's lying to you. You
can decide that for yourself. I just think
that's interesting, and I think that is a
when you see Andreessen come into play, like,
start noticing the interconnected
lines.
Now as always, that doesn't prove anything other
than the connection.
But it's something to note in regard to
the question of whether or not there's a
network that they you know, these people pretending
to be these new independent things that are
really just an, you know, an abstract
variation, a deviation from the norm, which we
saw a lot, guys. We've seen a lot
of these. Megyn Kelly, you know, it all
happened around a weird similar time when they
were losing control, and there still are, by
the way. But you can see it right
there. Brought to you by levels.
I find that personally interesting. Now we've also
talked about detachment two zero one. Just one
more example of technocracy in uniform, where you
had Meta, OpenAI,
and,
Palantir
have their chief technical officers and another end
up becoming, which they already did, lieutenant colonels
in the military.
I mean, just have if we if we're
not recognizing where this is going by now,
I I I don't think you're paying attention.
I don't think you want to see this.
This is happening rapidly
right in front of us. Technocracy,
the chipped
the technocratic Zionist coup of this country. Now
don't forget Trump's mega bill
dramatically expands biometric surveillance
pretty much all over the country if you
understand the way they break down the travel
routes and everything else involved, and it arguably
will be the case anyway based on whatever
next thing happens. And That's not even about
the AI moratorium, which was, at least last
time I checked, removed.
It's about
exactly what it looks like, almost as if
that was the head fake, and this is
what's actually happening.
Teller Houdak points out
what Steve said about what Greg Reese posted,
which is the Federal Reserve Bank has served
its purpose and is no longer needed. Crypto
AI world is here now, and the Fed
is obsolete. Now he's saying this because we're
seeing a lot of, you know, discussion right
now about the fed and whether or not
it's even like, the point is that we
have been the independent media has been calling
out the concerns, the lie that is the
fed. Not a government. It's not the federal
it's anything. It's it's an independent
institution that's control it's it's a it's a
manipulative force. And the point is that we've
all known that this was coming to a
head at some point. And because they see
us pointing this out and most people are
starting to call it out, well, like everything
else we're seeing, you know, during this administration,
it's not PIM or any of this the
government during this administration
that is now finding a justification to roll
out the new thing. But what they want
you to think first is we're doing what
you always asked for, getting rid of the
fed, shutting down everything. Even if it who
knows if it happens, like shutting down the
IRS, all the claims they make. But should
it begin,
Greg Reese already sees the obvious,
that they are building right behind it a
worse system.
It's the point.
And AM Wake up says this, Steve Poikkanen,
this, I think, is why and the Fed
is trending lately. The bait and switch administration
marches on. Right? They want you to think
this is what's about to happen. So you
think you're getting what you want.
Now let's also point out
the
leaked whole of government AI plan that is
provable.
After the update, it is actually still provable
based on where it's they basically the US
government just shifted over these files, not thinking
they're hiding it from everybody, but all they
did was move it to another side where
they were able to find it. And I
went over this entirely in my show.
The impending future of AI government, but who
controls the AI. The point here is that
this is a Donald Trump rather, a US
government plan, but now with Trump's
administration, to turn the entire government into an
AI dynamic.
And, I mean, can't we not see they're
telling you this now. You can see it.
But this was planned long before, and they
didn't tell you that. They didn't run their
campaign on this, did they?
Jason Basler, just summing up this segment says,
you were promised spending cuts,
and you got the bill, which by the
way,
I know I really don't understand.
It's like we're always all being tested.
Why in the world are we actually all
continuing to say big, beautiful bill? It's it's
it's my it's it confounds me. Not only
is it ridiculous,
it's it's it's long and necessary.
Like, we can call it the name of
whatever the name of whatever the bill actually
is. We can call it Trump's bill. We
can call it the big bill. But the
fact that I mean, he's making he's using
it there to make sure you know what
he's talking about. But the idea that this
in corporate media, even people that they're like,
we hate Trump or the big beautiful bill.
Like, you're saying it's a big beautiful bill.
It just seems so silly to me that
we are so easy to train. But the
point is you were promised bending cuts. No.
You got this gigantic monstrosity that everyone is
now finally realizing was a problem. You were
promised a ban on CBDCs.
You got stablecoins in the Genius Act, which
is what we we were telling you. Right?
It was gonna be a stable coin version,
and that's example of bait and switch. No
CBDCs, but they were finding the private coin
version, which is far, far worse. You were
promised the end of the deep state, but
you got Palantir database.
Now it's not a revolution. It's a technocratic
rebrand.
Exactly.
Now let's talk about the two party illusion
that effectively, for some people, keeps that obvious
albatross hidden from everybody.
And this is just entertaining,
funny, but important at the same time to
show that there's so
these million follower accounts
are influencing
a ton of people.
Now, this person and a few we're gonna
show are just this
just a special case of their own, even
amongst the lying mainstream alternative media.
But he says,
do I have to be the one that
says it?
There's not one person in the middle class
I don't what does this say? I haven't
read that yet. There's not one person in
the middle class who cares about going to
Mars,
even though, you know, he's poor. They just
want to provide for their family and give
the best life here possible. Here on planet
Earth, tax cuts are a miracle to the
middle class, making their life just gonna blah
blah blah blah. There's never going to be
a colony on Mars. It's a gigantic waste
of money. It's action. If
it ever actually happened, it would be four
or five of the richest people on Earth.
So tired of this nonsense.
Oh, okay. That's funny. So,
I love that it's there now. That wasn't
there earlier, and here's here's why. Or here's
here's why I am gonna point this out
because this account, which I'm really enjoying lately,
this is Shaul, this you,
here's what he said.
And and now and from May twenty sixth
of this year, no less,
I wanna go to Mars.
It's just you can't like, that's priceless.
So, I mean, wouldn't you even go what
couldn't you go back and delete that? Is
he not even here's what I think is
actually possibly the case that he's not even
aware
that he's that easy to control, that maybe
he thinks both those things in each moment.
And that's silly. Now, yes, people can evolve
their opinions, but realize it's not about that
he's evolved. These people will say as we
keep seeing, which is why he's a victim
of this, whatever Trump says tomorrow or today
is what he swears was always the case.
And if Trump says the next thing the
next day, that's what he says was always
the case. We all see this. And here's
a good example of that.
I think it's funny. So, you know, nobody
wants this. And he literally says, I wanna
go to Mars in May. Just so stupid.
You can't you gotta laugh at this stuff.
But and I simply said, but when Musk
becomes Trump's friend again suddenly, it will all
make sense, and it always did. Right? Here
is Nick Sorter.
Same point.
Says that we talked about this in yesterday's
show. The Trump DOJ has begun prioritizing
stripping American citizens, naturalized,
yes, still American citizens of their citizenship.
And we've already seen cases that it's it's
becoming flimsy at best. We'll go over some
more in a second. My point is, he
says, democrats handed out citizenship, whatever the narrative
is. Yay. Strip them. Okay. So you don't
like the constitution anymore? You know, are are
you just that stupid? I just it's so
frustrating to see these people that will just
jump into whatever was said today despite how
it literally contradicts what they claim they believe
in thirty seconds ago. So I said this,
which is the kind of the point of
what we're seeing across the board.
Trump like, it's it's basically like a back
and forth with Trump and Nick. I said
it yesterday.
But Trump says, today, I am announcing something,
and it will be better than everything ever
created before or whatever. You know, he's hyperbolic.
Nick says, hooray for something. Something is exactly
what we voted for. Something is America first.
If you don't blindly cheer for something, you
hate America.
Trump the next day, something was never a
good idea as I've always said.
Nick Nick's sorter thirty seconds later. Only Democrats
support something, and Trump fighting something is exactly
what we voted for. Repeat rinse and repeat.
And, guys, we all know that this is
going on in a lot of people's feet.
Like, it's it's shockingly embarrassing,
and that's what we're seeing right now.
Here's a example of the same account pointing
out Gunther Eagleman. Same category.
He says, if gas hits 10 to $12
a gallon, I still won't buy electric car.
I'm that guy.
My new model s Plaid is home. Thank
you, Tesla, Elon Musk, for making a badass
car. The acceleration, and this thing is wild.
No. Yeah. Again, maybe he changed his mind.
That is okay. My point is about the
people that will serve like, my point is
most of these people are suddenly now going,
those are bad again because Trump just said
that yesterday, and Elon Musk has always been
a bad guy even though they were just
pandering to him every moment because Trump told
him to.
It's everywhere you look, guys. You know it.
Another example we showed you before was when
Trump came out the first time and said
or,
basically,
allows restaurants, hotels, and farm
illegal immigrants
to be to continue to do so because,
well, so we can't ruin their farms.
But what was funny is right before he
said that, DC Draino came out and said,
time to start arresting CEOs who knowingly hire
illegal aliens.
Okay.
Next day, Trump goes, well, we're gonna allow
them legal aliens in farms and restaurants, you
know, that he owns farms, restaurants, and hotels.
And I simply said, breaking. DC Draino calls
for the arrest of Donald Trump and Elon
Musk because both of them use them in
plenty of examples, and he's making that okay.
I said, or should we assume he didn't
mean all CEOs?
Hypocrisy, guys. It's everywhere you look right now.
Now Slow Newsday makes the point.
How you get rich in independent media, in
quotes, mainstream alternative,
never have an original thought. Live or die
according to what's trending. Never look below the
surface.
Steal the work opinions of shadow banned media.
Always, always, always wait till the safe to
talk about anything real.
It's it's exactly what happens.
Now there's also examples of politicians.
Here's the Zionist Miller. President Trump is delivering
on every single promise he campaigned on. Go
back and watch the rally speeches, every promise,
every day, one after another. Honor the mandate.
That's basically him telling you to follow the
follow tow the line. Do what you're told
because of the mandate.
Ignact the agenda.
Tony Montana says Epstein files, JFK files, nine
eleven files, or I could add ending the
IRS, ending the ending all these different things.
Things can concern the American public. Things that
concern the American public are still classified.
And the point is this is not true.
And to be real, as you all know,
a ton of Republicans, even those that were
very, very hard go Trump, are starting to
call it out.
Here is Lisa, Christine, who's a supporter.
He she says, what the are are are
there no are there no mass deportations?
No arrests? No Epstein files?
No wall built? No shutdown of the Department
of Education, CIA, FBI?
Stop lying to us.
See, Miller is just trying to keep you
invested in this Zionist overtaking of our country
as far as I can tell.
She also points out another broken promise. Trump
is not delivering on his pledge of no
tax on Social Security. This has been replaced
with a temporary three year deduction of violence.
There he the the narrative shifts and they
go, that's what we always wanted because the
Eagleman cat, turds, and Johnsons out there will
just claim that's what you always wanted and
make you know that that's what you wanted.
That's what you asked for even though that's
not what you asked for. Is it that
they're telling you they speak on behalf of
the nation apparently? They don't.
Like, that's hubris.
Or propaganda, this person says I voted for
Trump. The only thing Trump has done is
close the border, and he hasn't even done
that to be quite honest. Everything else has
been a total half lie and half lie.
Thomas Massie, the president, he says. Interesting.
Now here is Robin Field saying,
you mean, like, not funding planned parenthood? You
mean, like, no Medicaid for illegals? You mean,
like, not funding sex changes? All of these
are still
in the bill,
what people are choosing to ignore. It says
it's not beautiful. It's an average increase of
$560
a year for the lowest 20% income and
a tax saving of the top 10%. Tell
me again how you want to take care
of seniors when you are taxing retirees and
those having to subsidize their Social Security the
most. And the the point is so many
people have their criticisms of what is going
on, and they just wanna come up and
go, you know, preach the narrative that their
sycophants will cheer for. And that's that's that's
all this is right now. I mean, there's
plenty of other things to get into around
a lot of this. You know, plenty of
other things that haven't come to pass. You
all know. We've talked about them relentlessly.
And this is another example. And here, this
same account, this is this you.
There I mean, he has, like, 75 of
these, by the way. And it just shows
you this is what politics is. And now
by extension, the blindly team sport politics partisans.
Brian Steele says The United this is back
in 02/02/2022.
The United States has now hit $30,000,000,000,000
in debt. That's over 90,000 per dollars per
American. We need to stop
the uncontrolled spending from Washington.
07/01/2025,
off to DC to deliver the OBBB for,
you know, bill big, beautiful bill for president
Trump's signature. So many, many, many, many, many
of them have said, we can't keep spending,
and then today go, yay, Bill.
They don't care.
Now talking about Trump, which clearly is the
factor for why a lot of these people
are, I mean, lost in all of this
or are choosing to take a side.
Just a thought put this out. I do
think this is very relevant. And before we
kinda point to the Butler thing as well.
She says the Trump's SIOP is so multilayered
and undeniably genius.
The establishment has successfully conditioned both parties
to focus on Trump for all the wrong
reasons. He's not Hitler, like Democrats think.
He's not a savior, like republic Republicans think.
He's a very convincing, consuming
convincing, consuming, and charismatic actor
who will absolutely be selected this election. Now
this was
11/05/2024.
Where is my place?
Where oh, here we go. So he can
continue to dis to distract supporters of both
parties. Now this is we talked with her
before this. We share the similar opinion. Remember
this remember when I mean, we could be
doing jumping jacks and backflips and saying, well,
I called it. I called it like some
people do. The point is we very clearly,
many more than once, said that Trump was
going to be the person put in that
place, which my opinion, I didn't know that
for a fact. But the point is I
think there's obvious reasons to see why that
was coming. And it says, meanwhile, the technocrats
and global cabal who fund them will move
forward with implementing all of the policies we've
been
successfully distracted from.
Point yep. Is that all what's happening? She
said this in November 2024.
Mean meanwhile,
there that's the part I just read. They
will and the fed replaced with CBDC, or
at this point, a stablecoin, same dis direction.
They will control the border with biometric surveillance.
They will implement a voter ID that will
become your digital ID. They will present everything
app that will manage your social credit score.
All these things are still building. Right? All
of them going in the same direction. This
won't happen overnight, but it will happen unless
we stop the madness now. We are consumed
by a scripted reality TV show. It might
be entertaining, but continuing to be distracted by
it will only solidify our digital prism. Make
no mistake. The the technocratic pied piper is
Trump and Elon, in my opinion,
and Americans of all political leanings are following
his tune down the river.
Decensored News points out he's literally a world
a WWE
hall of famer,
which doesn't necessarily prove he's lying in either
context, but it's just worth considering. You know,
maybe even thinking about the fight fight fight.
Right? I mean, we've seen this kind of
thing before. We've seen Trump playing the role,
acting,
has different TV shows
worth considering.
Now Slow Newsday put this out. I I
genuinely think this is worth,
you know, just reflecting on.
Sal, the aggregates put this out with a
thinking face, and it simply shows July
July 2018 and May 2025. Now, again, guys,
the point of this
now look, and and just to be clear,
for there's people in the chat that are
kind of, like, coping with this and going,
that's a fake one down there on the
bottom, or he got plastic surgery, or, you
know, anything's certainly possible, guys. But as we
already showed you before,
you could take pictures from any number of
any places, and we did I did this
myself with live shots from different times of
videos of Trump. And it's the same exact
thing.
I don't know how we can make sense
of this without realizing we were manipulated in
some way, which we all seem to think
with that whole event, especially now, that they
just kinda put it to bed and said
one shooter, and we just the Republicans didn't
call that out. I mean, you none of
you thought that, but seemingly the the leaders
of your mainstream alternative media movement,
I guess, just quieted everybody because we didn't
wanna be you. We don't counter signal the
leader.
But, guys,
remember when they said that this little bridle
there was like, where the bull no. No.
That was the same before he was shot.
It's the same thing now. I I just
think it's a special kind of ignorance to
not acknowledge that something happened. I was thinking
about this today, and I just was like,
there's I can't even make sense of how
that would like, unless it was just thoroughly
entirely manufactured, which I'm not gonna say. I
can't prove that.
How it would make sense that if he
wasn't, how all of that would have happened
the way it did? I just think it's
very, very, very strange. And I said this
at the time. I mean, the point is
in the midst of, like, an immediate, you
know, event and everyone's very charged up and
emotional, it's and you know, it's as I've
always pointed out, it's more important in that
moment than ever to be overly objective, to
make sure that we're not jumping to conclusions.
But as I said at the time, it's
in it's very clear that there was something
going on. And I was one of as
far as I know, one of the very
first people to point out,
this.
Remember the this is the scene. I've been
including some shows we did on this, where
you can easily see from where he was
on the roof, especially with what you can
see from these pictures, by the way. Here's
an actual video where they're coming up on
the roof and finding him. Look how far
in that is. Do you remember all this?
How far they would have been in right
there, claiming that you were somehow able to
see him on that roof from all the
way over here down. And remember, you have
videos of them standing alongside that building, which
was high enough to where you couldn't just
look over the top. And on top of
that, that where he was standing on the
stage, from where that shot is litter and
you could look at the timing and when
he looked to they said he looked to
the screen, that's when it happened. His ear
was covered from that side when that took
place.
That's a fact. I easily proved that and
plenty of other honest people pointed it out
too. That's not to say that I that
I knew what what the what made sense
of it all, but that was obvious.
And I simply and I just included this,
Derek's article from the time. This is from
July 2024. It was called, we must question
the attempted assassination of Trump. Now if you
read the article, he's not claiming he knows
either. But the the point is, even if
there is nothing that we should question everything.
If that's just logical, of course, we should
question what happened. That was his whole point.
There's no reason we shouldn't question this like
we question everything else and then went through
the reasons that we are skeptical.
Very important. Now there's all these comments you
can read for yourself. It is funny. You
know, people acting like this is, you know,
manipulated or it's plastic surgery. Yeah. You know,
again, consider those things. But are you speaking
from intelligence? Do you know that? Did he
claim that? Not that I know of.
Seems strange. Remember the little patch on his
ear? You know, they all wore it at
the event.
Just the whole thing
screams manipulation.
You can decide why or how. This is
the Freddie Pontone put this out of the
video. And every moment we got more information,
every time something stood out as an anomaly.
Every time. We went over it just like
everybody else. Here was the show at the
time of July 26, more inconsistency in the
Trump shooting narrative.
This one was evidence mounts showing official story
on a Trump shooting is false.
And of course, even then, 07/18/2024
canceled culture from the right.
Funny how these things bubble up in other
circles and, you know, we were saying years
ago. The point is that it's not just
my my show. It's a lot of people
in this field like Steve and people in
the IMA that are doing this
consistently long term, you know, and banging this
stuff out, making their assessments.
And then it's the ones we're pointing to
that tend to as Steve said, you know,
steal from shadowban. Can we just we'll scoop
these things up and point them out at
moments when it's already just about to bubble
over in order to go, I made that
claim, even though, you know, it's it's constant
this is happening.
But, you know, maybe I'm wrong too. Question
everything.
Rely on the facts and what you can
prove. Now Elon Musk,
a very interesting deal. We're gonna get into
his kind of weird, you know, as I
point in the chat, the suspect division.
This was from yesterday.
Elon Musk now expresses regret for wild CPAC
chainsaw display?
It lacked empathy?
Even the even this says, amid the renewed
feud between Trump and Elon,
the one time first buddy,
the world's richest man is now expressing some
con contrition
over his wild antics at the years CPAC
conference,
which saw him wielding a giant chainsaw with
the president's signature. The point is, like, he
I don't know. Like, I think I think
if this is real, then he's trying to
win people over my opinion because I think
he absolutely doesn't care that he did that.
That's my opinion.
But if it's not genuine,
to me, this is trying to win over
the same reason, but from a different angle,
trying to win over the people that loved
him before he was joining the right, before
he was on Trump's side.
To say, I was wrong. Everyone loves a
a redemption story. Right? I made mistakes. Take
me back on the left and let me
you know, that that's what it feels like.
Another or rather your new party, which is
something we've always been predicting that, you know,
it's inevitable. Like, it's not just that we
see it coming. It's that you know it
will eventually happen, which is a new party
to try to reimagine,
reinvent, reinvigorate
the two party illusion, the three party illusion,
which is, you know, it's the same point.
False binary is what, you know, which is
two things. The point is the same concept.
As I think we can argue and many
people do, it's the same thing that The
UK deals with,
even though there's more than two.
Now, also, before we get into their points,
let's not forget how Doge wrapped
up. It's a very weird thing. They are
it's still, I guess, happening,
but we're not hearing about it. We're not
seeing any new actions. We're not I I
think it actually kinda just petered out.
But what I thought was fascinating, I didn't
really talk about this. Back on June 8,
according to NPR, a Doge employee has said,
quote, I personally was pretty surprised,
actually, at how efficient the government was.
Now there's a reason you didn't hear this
or why people didn't report on it from
the the side that has been screaming about
how everything is only one-sided democrat fraudulent. The
point is he's claiming that it turns out
there really wasn't that much fraud.
Fraud was minimally said, and abuse was, quote,
relatively nonexistent.
Now that's not true.
Not because Elon said so, because you can
literally prove that's not true from both sides.
But what's weird is right after Elon sort
of exit stage left,
the Doge employee turns around and goes, hey.
Everything's good to go.
That felt very contrived and very strange to
me. I think it's building to what we're
seeing now as sort of like a wrap
up and moving on.
And then also, you know, that we, I
guess, fixed everything. You know, not really. No
one's gonna buy that, but that'll become sort
of the narrative. Like, we did our job.
Doge did it. It's over. Right? That is
we, Iran, we we we beat Iran. Didn't
Trump and Netanyahu both claim they won something?
It's clearly not, but that's how they they
desperately try to control the narrative.
This this is interesting as well. Post duopolous
says, anyone else remember when Elon Musk implied
there was an incriminating evidence about Trump and
the Epstein files? And then Trump threatened Elon's
government contracts? Good times.
I mean, how do we possibly not consider
like, it's funny how that is such a
major thing. So
either
he knows Trump's on the files and he
used that to threaten him because they were
fighting
or he used and or as three or
he was actually fighting still and he lied
about that
to to to get him back, which just
shows you who they're who they are. And
I think that's probably the most likely. Not
that I know the point is there's clear
evidence Trump's involved in all that. But maybe
Elon Elon didn't know that for sure and
just lied about it to try or, you
know, didn't know and said it anyway to
try to pressure him.
My point is I genuinely think that's who
these people are, how petty they are. And
I'm gonna show you a clip from Trump
next where he's threatening Elon in reverse in
the same way, showing you that these things
are not sacred, that they're abusing their tools
and probably have never had any real
no.
What's the right word? They're not not had
a a standing to do what they've been
doing with this, that they've been lying to
you. My point though is that Epstein or
or I guess the third option was ultimately
that they
created all this to to get the illusion
they were divided. But, I mean, my point
was how in the world you would allow
the floated idea of being in the Epstein
files.
But I don't know. Maybe maybe that's what
Israel wanted. I don't know. Worth considering, though.
And now Decentered News put this argument forward
as well. So this whole feud between Musk
and Trump in part, just is it just
a setup so that the the fiscal hawk
Musk can help found some controlled opposition third
party? Which is something, again, I said a
second ago is really I mean, how hasn't
that happened yet? I mean, we have there's
other, you know, parties, but I mean, like,
a legitimate, like, roll off. Like, that's what
I thought MAGA and, like, the rhinos. I
thought that's what it was gonna become.
Like, not just a weird split off, like,
an actual, like, official with a with a,
you know, an RNC for the new party
kind of a thing, a DNC for the
new party and a different dynamic
tapped into the same broken system.
But it says, or take one over and
rebrand it like he did with the free
speech platform, you know, free speech platform Twitter
because it seems like the same basic playbook.
Now we'll go over these tweets.
Here's the one where he said, is it
time to create a new political party?
And out of 5,000,000 votes, 80% said yes.
Now that if you only give them yes
and no, the answer I think the answer
like, yes, there should be more. But the
if you included more options, I'm going to
bet you most of those 80%, in my
opinion, would probably argue if you shut down
the government entirely, they'd say yes. Or to
remove both parties, they'd say yes. Like, I
think that's where that actually come from.
Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.
Did you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this
principle? No.
You gotta love that. That's from 03/25/2022.
Now,
he says, if this insane spending bill passes,
yeah, spending bill. Could you just call it
that? The American party will be formed the
next day.
That's interesting. The American party, of course. Our
country needs an alternative to the Democrat Republican
unit party so so that the people can
actually have a voice. Oh, now you care
about the unit party. Weren't you the one
continuing to claim that Democrats were the deep
state? Like, guys, there's just no way to
be honest about this without or rather to
be to not acknowledge this is a shockingly
obvious
contradiction to what you were that was being
pushed on everybody.
So either he lied the entire time, which,
by the way, is what I think. He
was playing all of you. He was saying
whatever you wanted to hear, whatever the lowest
common denominator wanted to hear, you know, democrat
pedophile, deep state, Muslim terrorist, whatever the things
they're putting out, which in some cases, yes,
there are no other truth to all of
these things, but the reality is trying to
create it as a one-sided point.
And now he says the unit party. So
how could there be a unit party if
the Democrats are the deep state? Let me
break this down for me, Elon Musk. So
that's one reason why I feel like this
feels contrived. Now realize that my point is,
I still do think that he was saying
whatever they wanted to say just to lie
to you. That's the both can exist. And
now the plan is to break off and
make you think they're fighting.
I just you know, how do how do
you reconcile that? Either, again, he is a
dishonest person who will say whatever he needs
to say, which is true in any case,
I think, or
or audition.
I just lost my train of thought there,
but the the body I said it three
times over. I'm just trying to make it
clear for people. The bottom line is that
this is a dishonest statement that contradicts what
he said before.
And he says every member of congress
on the thirtieth
who campaigned on reducing government spending
and then immediately voted for this bill, the
biggest debt increase in history should hang their
heads in shame. And this part is interesting.
What they're gonna mention next, he says, and
they will lose their primary
next year if it is the last thing
I do on this earth.
This shit's a gigantic statement. Maybe he doesn't
mean it at all. We'll find out next
year, I guess, because the bill, I think,
is clearly gonna pass.
Now here's what he said
yesterday.
And I just think I'll I'll comment it
afterwards. It's only eighteen seconds, but this is
just it's the same point with with Elon
Musk in that statement.
You listen to this, and if you can't
acknowledge that this shows you that this is
frivolous,
they're doing whatever they want to anyone they
want, whenever they want, then I you know,
you're be you're being dishonest with yourself.
Ripping into this bill again. Are you concerned
that Republicans are gonna be swayed by Musk
and his money? No. I don't think so.
I think what's gonna happen is Doge is
gonna look at Musk. And if Doge looks
at Musk, we're gonna save a fortune. Thank
you very much, everybody.
I don't think he should be playing that
game with me. Yeah. So he threatened him.
Right? Whether he means it or not, which
is certainly possible that he just, you know,
which is irresponsible, childish.
Clearly, his statement there
go and there well, there's one first part
here. By Musk and his money. No. I
don't think so. Oh, yeah. So the question
was, are you worried that his money will
sway other politicians to go against his agenda?
I think what's gonna happen is Doge is
gonna look at Musk. And if Doge looks
at Musk, we're gonna save a fortune.
Okay. So how do you make sense of
that?
How do you know that, Trump? So if
you're gonna save a fortune and Doge is
about removing inefficiency and waste and fraud,
Did you just tell us that Elon's been
fraudulently manipulating the American people the entire time
and you were okay with that?
Or are you making all of that up?
Or are you gonna use this DOGE platform
to dishonestly take money from somebody who doesn't
deserve it? Any one of those. There's no
other way to make sense of what he
just said.
I think we all know the reality of
this. I think that we've seen lies about
what they claim they're saving while they actually
spend in the same ways in other context.
I mean, it's all an illusion here, guys.
It's the government playing games with the left
right illusion.
But again, it's certainly also possible that there
are feuding, but it makes the same point,
doesn't it? That if they are feuding, it
just makes it even more shockingly petty and
not more you know, less devious, try to
trick you into thinking that and just showing
you they're children.
But either way,
if we do it, we'll save millions. So
you're accusing him of fraud or you're lying
about it or you're okay with that or,
you know, or you're using Doge as a
manipulative tool. I mean, you can't miss this
stuff, guys.
Now here's high impact flicks, makes the same
kind of assessment, but from what Trump Trump
wrote. He put out, I've I've I think
this was yesterday. It doesn't show the date.
He says, Elon Musk knew
long before he was strongly endorsing me for
president that I was strongly against the EV
mandate. It is ridiculous
even though clearly he was leaning into it
when when Elon was next to him
and was always a part of my campaign.
Election electric cars are fine, but not everyone
should be forced to own one, which, you
know, who can disagree with that? And that's
not really what they're pushing. The point is
that that's what the sentiment is that everyone
should agree with. It's choice. Right? But that
that's what's put forward, like, with the shots
and the things. A lot of people from
his side would argue they shouldn't exist at
all. Not that I agree with that. My
point is that that seems to be a
deviation from what most of his base thinks.
Even that, let alone hawking Tesla people in
from the White House. But it says Elon
may get some subsidy
get more subsidy than any human being in
history. So even right there, he's showing you
that that's dishonest. I mean, why is that
okay? Why is that happening? Well, because he's
part of the government. He is a government
contractor who is building out the dick the
technocratic future.
But he says, and by far and without
subsidies, Elon would probably have to close-up shop
and head back to South Africa.
Says no more rocket launches, satellites, electric car
production,
and our country would save a fortune.
You know? So are all those things frivolous?
Is he lying about all those things? Aren't
you the ones telling us all those things
are super important? I mean, are you just
boxing him out because he said mean things
about you?
We have to be honest about this. I
mean, it like, this is what I mean
by the lowest common denominator. There are people
that will love this just because it's spicy,
because he's yelling at him. And look at
Elon, looks stupid. And I I like when
people fight or just I hated him all
along. I'm I'm with Trump no matter what.
Those are
ignorant people. Those are people that don't, you
know, that only care about their emotional manipul
or I shouldn't even say that. Maybe that
maybe they just don't care about the same
things, which that's, you know, each their own.
But understand that they don't care about whether
this is correct, whether it saves the country,
whether this is the right thing for the
people of this kind you know? Because obviously,
if it's more about the back and forth,
then these things are secondary.
But this shows you in every possible way
that they don't, that this is about them,
their personal agenda, their personal ego.
And it says, perhaps, we should have Doge
take a hard look at this. Big money
to be saved. Well, Brian
oops. That was right there. Brian Heinpach Flick
says translation, I knew Elon was bad for
America, but I pretended he wasn't and kept
silent because I hate Americans.
Now that he's said bad things about me
and my big beautiful bill, I'll pretend to
save America from Elon the parasite.
Exactly.
Now here,
again, the same Vox populi, Vox Day, it's
the same thing we talked about before, technocratic
direction. He says, is it time to create
the new party? We just showed you this.
80%, at least, of his following. I mean,
he's got,
what, 221,000,000
followers? So he's got 5,000,000 engaged on that.
Like, the point is that's, you know, his
supporters are agree with him largely. I think
that's the case. But either way, it's a
lot of people. That's a large part of
the of the country. Again, assuming that's actually
true, he could easily manipulate these things.
I'm not saying I think that. Just that's
obviously possible.
And then, of course, this is a use
e n x c search account that's pointing
out in the interview with Yacarino and what's
it? Mario
awful.
And he says, I'm gonna promote a third
party, but I'm going to censor and shadow
ban the people who would support me most.
Just making fun of this. You know, the
idea that this platform has been nothing they
promised
despite the screaming partisan narratives that they want
you to thank and the people to support
that because they're on a side. The facts
are obvious. He goes, I wanna make x
a one stop shop platform, but I will
kick anyone off who dares criticize Jewish crimes
of Israel.
What did the ex CEO say? Twitter CEO.
Twitter is giving away everyone's personal info to
militaries and governments. All I mean for or
working with the ADL or, you know, shadow
banning, centering for hate speech.
Totally different world we're in. It is actually.
It's just far, far worse.
Now same point here about this cat turd
clown saying, I wanna go to Mars.
Let's talk let let's talk to a ranch,
said, look who look who is pretending that
they understand.
Two party illusion stuff. Again, Elon Musk says
they just pretended
they just pretend to be two parties.
It's just one uni party in reality. I
really I really take a second and think
on this.
This guy either has literally no principle at
all and just, you know, yesterday was saying
whatever he need to say about the Democrats
to get you to support him. And now
he's saying this because he wants to start
a new party because he wants your support.
Right? Or, you know, which is dishonest or
the the or at the end of the
day,
you lied the entire time.
Right? That you want and and now this
is what you really believe. Right? That you
lied about the Democrat deep state, but now
you've always believed in the unit party because
that's the truth, guys.
So you I mean, everything's a fraud. I
mean, how long did we say this when
he was jumping on stage in dark MAGA
and, you know,
spitting back things at you that he thought
you wanted to hear that felt clumsy and
and forced and didn't really you know, it
just not it's clear that he is playing
a role to me. How do we not
see that
now? How do I mean, how do you
come how do you reconcile this with what
they've been saying? Under the rabbit hole simply
points out, debt under Democrats, debt under Republicans.
Gee, what a shock. It's like one linear
progression of the agenda, like I've been saying,
because it is. Because this is no different.
There is no there are different people that
believe there are different sides. But at the
end of the day, the government
is the government.
And they work together
in every possible way that overlaps with controlling
your life.
Now, Clint Russell, some there's plenty of people
out there that are, you know,
choosing to, you know, basically take Elon's mass
Elon and Massey side over Trump despite this
entire time. You know, even before the selection,
largely pushing back on anybody that said this
is you know, they're they're both a problem,
and choosing one or the other is just
the same problem. And we got called black
pill and this is a purity test and
all that. But now choosing Elon's side. But
I think it's interesting because
I I think this is what we're gonna
see. We're gonna see people that decide to
make their what appears to be this principled
stance to join one of these new sides,
and it's just the extension
of the same thing. So if I warned
about the false paradigm then, it's the same
point now. Jumping into the new party they
create is the same trap. You'd think people
could begin to see that, but, you know,
I could be wrong. Definitely.
He says, I don't believe for a second
that Elon would be would be publicly challenging
Trump on spending,
damaging his own companies and turning the MAGA
base against himself all because EV credits. Well,
I think it's a lot more than EV
credits, but I agree that it doesn't seem
like it makes sense.
But very petty people and, you know, egotistical
megalomania. Yeah. That makes sense. But it go
he says it's obvious he understands math and
strongly believes that the spending levels will destroy
us. Well,
he wasn't really I mean, there's plenty of
points where he was holding back on statements
like that or criticism they'll now put out
because he was with the team. So you
have to consider whether he might now be
saying things to challenge the team because he's
no longer on the team. I don't mean
just the bill. I mean, in every sense.
But also that he's this as intelligent as
he claims to be is is questionable, to
be honest. Greg Reese put out a really
great breakdown of how most of his background
and his work seems to be built on
a bunch of lies. So it's worth considering
that he's just a front man. It's obvious
he understands. He goes on math and strongly
believes is I respect it a ton.
A willingness to self sacrifice for a cause
bigger than yourself is very rare among billionaires.
Oh,
here we go again.
So the emotional
over I mean, this is all personal emotional
opinion.
If we're working on facts and he just
broke off from the team, maybe we should
start questioning whether there's more going on here
than his willingness to save the world from
the people you just told us were gonna
save the world.
I have to choose between Elon Muskie and
Paul versus Trump and GOP swamp? Easiest call
in my life. So now that the Trump
swamp,
didn't we just go through this?
He says, there's no political solution.
Never mind the transhumanist fraud like Elon. This
is Keith. He's got 12 kids. 11 are
IVF babies, and, like, and and, like, nine
or more are with the Jewish woman.
Not that that necessarily matters to anybody unless
that you are assuming all Jewish people have
the problem. He's a ketamine addicted front man
who is trying to soft push to AI
take over. This is his person's opinion, but
he says, Wef, Harari
or or the sick stick and Elon or
the carrot.
Now point is also to make sure we
understand that Zionism very much does overlap with
Jewish people, so it's worth considering that that's
working through that. But just always gonna point
out that we shouldn't pretend that being Jewish
is in and of itself
a problem. It's not. It's if there's Christian
Zionism, Christian or, you know, Jewish Zionism, I
believe that's the bigger issue.
Think for yourself about it. But Elon Greg
Reeves put this clip out down here I
just mentioned. Elon Musk has always been a
fraud and has all the appearances of the
MK Ultra puppet.
That's a good clip, and we played it
before.
Lies.
Daniel McAdams comes out and says, who is
the real MAGA?
And asked about Donald Trump or Thomas Massie.
92%
said Thomas Massie.
That's three thousand six hundred three hundred three
thirty three votes, but it's still the point.
Now this is what I thought was funny.
D train says, yeah, the 2,016
never Trump or coattail riders are the real
MAGA.
I thought it was important to make a
point off of this. And I said, what
I find funny is that it seems clear
that you see this MAGA as a club,
a group, a team to be removed from,
as opposed to what it actually stands for,
the principle behind it. Make America great again.
And in that light, this is obvious to
anyone not blinded by TeamSport politics. The point
being that whether you trust Massey or not,
which we shouldn't trust any of them, his
principled actions
are shockingly he he's the most principled congressman
that I could ever that I personally think
I've ever seen. And clearly and again, I'm
you're I'm not gonna support him. I don't
support politicians, and I frankly expect to be
manipulated over the years by these people or
either tricked or lied to just because that's
what history shows us. If he doesn't, I
would love to see that. I hope for
that, but I expect what we've always seen.
That's just logical. The point though
is that he is by far more in
line with the principles of what we what
their party, what their side said was going
to be make America great again before the
selection.
And so for them for them to say,
oh, yeah. Those ones are the fake ones.
Well, then all you're doing is making it
about the team and not about the principles
of what you were told was gonna happen,
which Massey has held to.
I think that's important to think
about. Now David Icke, I'll play this clip
first, has a has a statement about Zionist
Miller. Now this is very interesting because Miller
here accuses Elon Musk on live TV of
supporting the invasion
and called him an outside voice who doesn't
represent the interest of the American people.
Wow. How fast things can shift. Guys?
This bill is to support the invasion.
To oppose this bill is to support the
continued
giveaways and freebies to cheaters and scam artists
to Of course. Because literally every single person
involved in any of these things are all
liars, cheaters, rapists, and terrorists in end thus
13. Right?
No.
This guy's a liar. He's a deceiver. He's
a deliberate. He everything he says is just
like Trump. It's hyperbolic.
Now also note how this plastic face person
next to him just goes along and never
you know, the point is as a journalist,
you're not supposed to let people just rattle
off absolutely provable
lies.
Or, you know, hyperbolic statements that sweep up
an entire group of people as one thing
even though it's not true. But that Fox
and CNN and all the rest of these
are propaganda platforms, and this is what they
want you to hear. Oppose this bill is
to support
a 68%
tax hike on the American public, and it's
also to oppose to to oppose this bill
is to support
a dep deprivation
of all of the tax benefits that president
Trump is fighting to deliver the middle class.
Except, look, I don't think anybody that other
than people that support their team are saying
that, and a lot of Republicans who are
knowledgeable and honest are going that's simply not
true. Like, no tax on tips, no tax
on Social Security, no tax on overtime. The
senate passed this bill just today demonstrating
that they are fighting for president Trump. They
are fighting for his agenda. They are not
going to listen to an outside voice that
does not represent the interest of the American
people. Except they were and you were, like,
25
ago. Like, literally telling us that he's gonna
save the country, all of you. And now
he's like this pariah enemy that we should
never trust.
I mean, it it doesn't take a lot
of intelligence to recognize how confounding that is.
Again, either they were lying then or they're
lying now.
Not hard to recognize. Or the interest of
the Republican party and the house is gonna
rally behind president Trump to pass this bill
for America.
America.
So David Icke says, Israel's spokesman in the
Trump administration, well, they all are really, now
trashing Musk without a mention of the $250,000,000
to get Trump elected. When the cult leader
turns on you, it doesn't matter what you've
done for him. MAGA media, take note.
All this is creating the very chaos that
this crowd are in there to generate.
Chaos means the status quo is demolished, and
that's exactly the game so a new AI
status quo can replace it.
Now, I mean, right now, you you like,
if any I don't care who it is.
I mean, we saw it with Tucker Carlson,
guys, that he comes out and says what
you did with Iran was not the was
not America first. And it it it for
at least a day, the entire movement was
the ones that were, you know, the teams
for politics
hated him,
screamed about him, called him a temp, and
he was always a liar, cat turd, all
the rest.
All of these people. So my point is,
any of you out there who think you're
just a diehard Trump supporter, if you dared
even momentarily,
unless to say you have, like, a large
enough following to where it might reach his
ear, deviate from what the standing what the
what the narrative is, what the talking points
are, and came out and said, I did
think this is the opposite. Not only would
your own audience eat you alive, audience capture,
but you would then get attacked by the
movement and possibly even get disowned by the
Trump team because you said the opposite of
what they claimed.
Massey saw this. Massey didn't insult him. He
just said, I don't think this is the
right direction. He's not allowed to have his
own opinion.
It's just ideological control. It's very obvious.
Now I simply said, either it's all a
ploy in regard to the same clip for
the podcast, which means they're playing you, all
of you, the ploy being the divide,
attacking
Musk, which means they're playing you, all of
you, left and right, or this is how
easy your cast aside by Trump when you
even once
failed to tow the line,
which means you were played to begin with.
My point is either way, these people are
not fighting for you.
Trump and Musk feud blows up again with
yet again the threats of Doge
and deporting Elon Musk.
I mean, you you know, this is just
borderline cartoonish and comical, if I mean, if
not completely.
To now even be flirting with the idea
of deporting Musk, you know, just,
just did the whole thing reeks of just
absolute incompetence or that we're being played into
something very clearly.
So talking about the deportation, we just discussed
this yesterday. DOJ to prioritize revoking American citizenship.
Now I'm gonna play this again because I
really think people missed the point in this
that really, you clearly, the memo was meant
to focus on denaturalization
about people that come here,
get citizenship,
and then they claim they can remove it.
Now the re I went through deeply yesterday.
I get well, not to some degree, went
through the the the the background of that
discussion,
which shows you what you can get removed
for if you are a naturalized citizen, meaning
you moved here and got citizenship.
And it guys, it is what they're trying
to do and the way they're setting this
up, criticizing Israel,
being against the Iran war included in the
memo,
that is not enough. Now the the only
way they're trying to play that as enough
is to claim that's the national security. The
main thing, because it goes back to McCarthy
era, which is not a good time for
us to look to look to for what
we're doing today.
It goes back to the main two things
were national security and communism, which, by the
way, are exactly the two things they're trying
to use right now to push this forward.
And and we're gonna get to the Atlas
point and why this is a a lot
bigger
than just getting rid of some people they
think are breaking the law. There it's about
them trying to find any reason to get
rid of anybody that they don't like.
I it's it's clear as day to me.
And so if you look at all the
information here and who's already been applied and
who they're focusing on, it's obvious what's happening.
And my point was Trump
more than once said that it is not
just about naturalized citizens. In both statements, in
both interviews, and all the one they he
they say very clearly naturalized
and born in this country. And he says,
yes. What? You think they're special? That we
should get people out of here that are
breaking the law.
Well, yeah.
Human beings
all apply under the constitution, which is the
reality if you understand anything about the constitution.
And here we are today where they're showing
you yet again
that you're next.
Hey. You know, a little controversial, but I
couldn't care less.
We have a lot of bad criminals that
came into the,
into the this country, and they came in
stupidly. It was an unforced error. It was
a incompetent president that allowed it to happen.
It was an auto pen maybe that allowed
it to happen, and it did happen. But
we also have a lot of bad people
that have been hey. You know, a little
controversial, but I couldn't care less.
We have a lot of bad criminals that
came into the
into the this country, and they came in
stupidly. It was an unforced error. It was
a incompetent president that allowed it to happen.
It was an auto pin maybe that allowed
it to happen, and it did happen. But
we also have a lot of bad people
that have been here for a long time.
People that whack people over the head with
a baseball bat from behind when they're not
looking and kill them. People that,
knife you when you're walking down the street.
They're not they're not new to our country.
They're old to our country. Many of them
are born in our country. I think they
you know, little Damn it. Right there. They're
not they're not new to our country. They're
old to our country. Many of them were
born in our country.
There you go.
Born in the country.
So, I mean, he that with with whether
a slip of the tongue
or just a very quick statement to put
it on the record, you he's saying anybody,
which as I said, is probably the sixth
time now he's floated the idea of of
removing Americans.
I mean, whether you're talking about the idea
of literally removing an American who who remains
a citizen to some foreign prison or which
I argue is the way it will go,
is there effort to to push it through
to to remove your citizenship and then deport
you, which is what the whole thing seems
to be about?
I think we ought to get them the
hell out of here too. You wanna know
the truth. So maybe that'll be the next
job that we'll work on together. But I
For this Gulf Of America hat that looks
ridiculous.
So
here,
I wasn't gonna get into this the other
show. And I'm still my point is the
re the reason I didn't want to around,
Zohra what is it? Zoh Zohran
Mamdani, did I say it? In New York,
which recently won the primary.
I I don't wanna support politicians, just as
a matter of policy for me, as a
matter of practice, because I don't believe
like, for me, it's about the outcome, not
the promises. And the only way you can
support politicians these days is about promises, unless
they've had a track record that you can
lean into, like like O'Mashi, for example. But
I still am at the point where I
just I've been
everyone
has been played too many times by this
whole broken system. So my point was I
didn't wanna get into it because more so
yesterday was about people criticizing and defending. But
I wanted to make this point today because
it relates to to deportation because look at
that.
Soran Mamdani
responds to Donald Trump's deportation
threats.
I'm telling you guys, this is getting wildly
out of hand, and it is not gonna
go away because this is what Israel wants
yet again.
Zoran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York
mayor, was has hit back at Donald Trump,
president Donald Trump's threats to have him deported.
He says the president of The United States
just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of
my citizenship, put in a detention camp, and
deported.
Now and this is real, by the way.
I'll show you on his newest statement. It
says, not because I have broken any law,
but because I will refuse to let ICE
terrorize our city.
Now, I'm not defending this guy. But let's
be clear,
90% of what people are screaming about him
seems to be shockingly
either false, hyperbolic.
It's like saying a Palestinian supporter is a
terrorist or Hamas supporter. It's the same thing.
But, I mean, my point is, there's probably
plenty of things you could find with any
of these people that are compromised or politicians.
So it's really about the principle here and
about the about how this is being used
to set up the idea that people can
be deported, even somebody who is about to
become the mayor of New York.
His statements don't just represent an attack on
our democracy, he says, but an attempt to
send a message to every New Yorker who
refuses to hide in the shadows. If you
speak up, they'll come for you.
So even he is being threatened with deportation.
Now this is I think I just an
an overlapping point to all this because this
went crazy.
Some this Loomer was just following like she
always does, but plan a lot of people
came out and posted this the video of
him where he's
eating rice with his hands,
Which unless you're a complete backward moron, you
must understand that there's plenty of cultures around
the world that still do that regularly.
So, the idea that you can somehow pretend
that that's like, oh, look at how you
know, what does she say? You know, the
other word is like, you know,
look at these how are the words they
use? Animals eating with their hands, you know,
aside from, like, 75 examples of foods that
we eat with our hands.
It's it's just insane what people will do,
and they jump on the bandwagon. Right? So
Laura, as usual, did the same thing. And
she goes, honestly, being an Islamist, which I
I'm not aware that he is, but, again,
I'm not supporting these people, and a communist,
which
the idea that you could argue a political
mindset. There are communists in our congress right
now, and I'm not saying I support any
government, by the way. I think it's just
as problematic as any version that will eventually
lead to the control of our lives. But
the idea that they just turned the one
version, like, that one's the bad one because
you really? Because they're using these things to
go after certain kinds of people. That's what
it really comes down to. They're racist, disgusting,
vile people that will go after whatever Israel
seems to not like.
But it says, those were enough for me
to not want him in office. Well, which
is much more it's much different than not
wanting him in office. You guys have been
waging a smear campaign on this guy attacking
people he knows and going out. I mean,
it's crazy what these people do, yet ever
suffer consequences.
But I'm not talking about speech, like an
action,
off platform. But it says, he is from
Africa,
and you can tell in the way he
eats.
My god. This person is stupid. Like,
especially like, not just stupid, ignorant.
Grotesquely ignorant, like, to a shocking degree. And
let's realize, even people like Tucker Carlson and
others recently said she's, like, the grossest person
online or whatever he said. It's it's just
wild to me that somebody like this can
be, like, positioned and propped up inside this,
and everyone seems to think she's disgusting and
crazy. And yet because something else is keeping
her there, we that just continues and has
lots of influence and followers. And it's just
it's weird to me. I think you know
where I'm going with this, that there's a
lot of these propagandized,
manipulated elements out there that are not really
on your side.
And he's and she says, disgusting. My dogs
are cleaner and more civilized when they eat
than than little Mohammed.
Just I I do I even need to
speak about that?
I mean, it just blows me away that
there are you know, you know what grosses
me out? Is that there are so many
people who support her because they're disgusting too,
because they're going, yeah. Gross brown people or
whatever the dumb things they're saying down in
the chat. But what's hilarious about this is
what everybody else called out, which you already
saw and we covered.
This person says, here's a video of you
eating dog food with your bare hands.
You complete clown.
Well, yeah, guess what, guys? She not only
ate dog food with her hands, which is
that any different than what we just saw?
But it's dog food.
But somebody sent her that bag. We covered
at the time because I thought it was
hilarious, to be honest.
And the guy documented it all. We when
we covered it, of course, I didn't I
prove what we talk about, and the guy
had the receipts. He showed you what he
did. He sent her this as if somebody
like an advertiser saying, we want you to
advertise for our our human grade dog food,
which I also pointed out doesn't necessarily always
mean humans can eat it, by the way.
The point is that
they sent that to her. They said, we
want you to promote this human grade dog
food, and we'll give you a $100 to
do it if you eat it on the
air. Because it's you and great. It's okay.
You won't get hurt by it. Right? He
literally took a freeze dried bag, created a
little logo on it, put Purina in the
bag, and sent it to her. And because
she literally never does due diligence like Jones
or anybody else, she ate it live on
the air. And then he posted it all
and said, I literally got Laura Loomer to
eat Purina out of a bag on her
show because I simply gave her a $100.
I was like, my god. This is where
we are today. And so, again, the idea
that you're going, gross little Mohammed, my dogs
are more clean because he's eating rice like
his culture does in a lot of different
ways. Right? A lot of different cultures, whether
it's grabbing the tortilla and doing it that
way or eating
yes. That is there's there's restaurants in New
York and where I mean, even here that
are designed that way. It's just crazy to
me. Now
the point,
you're doing so obviously with a disgusting version
of food that you didn't even know what
it was, but you have the nerve to
call him out for that. Now it's not
about defending him, it's about defending anybody that
gets attacked for those kind of reasons.
Now, same thing.
Here's mister Mossad, who he he was acknowledged,
admitted Mossad agent, or at least was, which
you know the same thing in my opinion.
Here's Zohar Khan saying, I am heartbroken by
the news for and for the podcast, I'm
reading this exactly. I'm heartbroken by the news
from Colorado where Karen Diamond, a victim of
the vicious attack earlier this month, has passed
away. May Karen's memory be a blessed a
blessing and a reminder that we must constantly
work to eradicate hatred and violence.
Now because this overlaps with a
what is being warped into some demented hate
crime or rather, you know, the point being
that what what he's highlighting
is that that sad what happened, and we
should care about that. Violence is not okay
no matter who does it. Right?
No. According to site
wrong. According to him. What a snake.
Gad's sad because what a snake.
Let me read it again. I'm heartbroken by
the news from Colorado where Karen Diamond, a
victim of vicious attack, was this month passed
away.
May we constantly work to eradicate hatred and
violence? And he says, what a snake.
You know why? Because you've been spending your
entire day trying to convince everybody that he
secretly hates Jews, that he's secretly a Hamas
supporter.
Okay? And that that then how somehow means
that he's incapable of having compassion for a
person who got hurt because you guys I
mean, the the the gross person in this
dynamic are the people that are calling compassion
hatred
because they're so overwhelmed with hatred or rather
just propaganda that they need everyone to think
people that are fighting against Israel for political
reasons, not because the religion
are they need you to think they're racist
because that's his job that they do things
like that.
Or
this person
saying,
there are after he says the same quote,
there are zero comments about the Colorado attack
from Zoran,
Zoran.
How do you say that? Zoran
prior to this one. No condemnation of the
attack. No sympathy for victims. Zero. But suddenly,
miraculously, he wants you to believe that he
feels bad about the dead Jew murdered by
a free Palestine fanatic. That that's the point.
Oh, guess what? Twitter says, no. You're you're
wrong, and you don't care because, clearly, he
did stand up on July he did come
out on the first and say, condemn the
attack.
So she doesn't care. So do you think
she doesn't know that, or is she just
trying to pretend? Yeah. It doesn't matter.
The narrative becomes the focal point like we
saw with Waters or, I'm blanking on the
other politician. You know, where it just became
this witch hunt where it doesn't matter what
they say, the narrative is the fact, and
they just roll over the top of it.
The point is that this person's trying to
come out and show you you know, of
course, he could be lying about it, But
how can you come out and say his
compassionate statement is therefore gross because we tell
you what he thinks?
Just these people are lunatics. And I don't
mean any specific sides. Anybody
who is fighting for a genocidal entity and
calling anybody else who calls it out a
racist.
Now Ken Klippenstein says the New York Democratic
officials who've declined to endorse
Zoran. Democrats.
Kathy Hogell, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Christian Gillibrand,
Jeffrey Meeks, Ritchie Torres. I mean,
major
represent Democrat representatives.
So my point is,
as always,
the entirety of our government is completely bought
off influenced and controlled by a foreign power.
K? If every single one left and right
now it's not because they oops. How that
what I hit?
There it is. It's not because you have
to support this person. My point is that
it's obvious that it's the only reason they're
at, like, this aggressive
across the aisle force. No. Like, this
spot or I should say despite his obvious
popularity, which is what usually politicians only care
about,
that they're all in lockstep
saying no.
Why? Because Israel pays them all, and he
is pointing out Israel's crimes. That's what this
really comes down to.
And El Ehrmate says so extreme
in their devotion to Israeli supremacy and mass
murder that they won't endorse their party's elected
candidate, because that's the point. He won the
primary, guys. In America's largest city, how will
these people deradicalize?
The point is he won the primary, so
usually that's when the party goes, okay, that's
what the people want, right? Or so we're
told.
But now, no, we don't like what the
people chose. We want somebody else because democracy,
right?
It's just it's just comical what's going on
right now. They're showing you who they are
in every single way. They're showing you pays
their paycheck.
Crazy. Obviously, guys,
he I mean,
coming out and calling out what Israel's doing
could very well be opportunism. But my point
the entire time is we should support that
regardless. Just don't blindly support everything he says
under some assumption that he's now on your
side because he said the one right thing.
Right? Just point out what he said was
correct. Support that one thing and wait for
what he says next. Hold them hold all
of them accountable to their outcome, their action,
not their promises.
Of
course, DC Drano says, it's official.
Trump is going to war with Zoran.
Zoran.
As president of The United States, Trump says,
I'm not gonna let this communist lunatic destroy
New York.
That's what he said. Rest assured, I hold
all the levers.
I have all the cards.
I'll save New York City and make it
hot and great again, just like I did
with the good old USA.
I mean, I had to make sure that
was real. I can't believe that.
I mean, I can because that's the kind
of people we're dealing with, but it just
shows you, like, I feel like he thinks
he's
nothing can touch him.
That doesn't feel like desperation to me. That
feels like hubris. That feels like I'm willing
I'm it's okay that I can say I
can do whatever I want. I can stand
up and say as the president that I'm
not gonna let that guy be put in
place even though that's what the people want
because
make America great again? Because
I'm an I'm I control everything. I've got
all the cards. I hold all the levers.
Guys, it's like this is exactly what people
are trying to say. That's a problem. And
they go, oh, you hate Trump. You're a
Democrat. And maybe.
But it's also an obvious problem that anybody
with a brain can see is so far
over the top. This is
authoritarianism.
This is dictatorship. This is I control everything,
and I can make anything happen because I
want it. That's not what electing the president.
I mean, there's so many people that have
just woke up yesterday and think they know
everything about politics that are like, it's a
mandate. He can do whatever he wants. But
I love the constitution.
It's dangerous, guys, and it's alarming how many
people are out there right now. But that
is so shocking to me. And this person
says, meanwhile, Trump is endorsing the leader of
Syria who's slaughtering Christians.
Yeah. But DC Draino doesn't care about that.
At least he pretends he does in other
context. But Trump says the man that's leading
Syria was the head of some tough organizations.
Yeah. You mean Al Qaeda?
Hayat al Sham?
He's a pretty tough guy. He's a good
guy.
The organizations are ISIS and Al Qaeda.
This is not a joke, guys. The the
Trump literally just put this out, or I
think oh, I think I've got it at
the end of the show.
Right here.
You know, that's what he said. I I
just can't believe that we can't be honest
about this, or at least I can't believe
that there are people that still adhere to
the narrative when everyone else sees through it.
But just again
and DC drain over the fire symbol. Yeah.
Who cares about
constitution? Who cares about democracy? Who cares about
that that's what New York people voted for?
And, again, you know my opinions about all
that, but that's what they think.
So he comes out and just goes, woo
hoo. Go after the guy because team MAGA,
or rather just team Trump.
You should be embarrassed. How's that phase two
binder coming, bud?
Now let's talk about Atlas in the context
of
deportation.
This is actually really interesting to me. Now
this conversation,
obviously, the whole point of people like that
and the different two party illusion dynamic and
the the obvious influence from a foreign power
is what's driving all of this in my
opinion.
One, the
partisan element, the partisan ability
to stop us from seeing the full picture
because it's all divided, and it's about divide
and conquer, sort of probably what Elon and
Trump are doing.
But the obvious nature of what Israel is
driving in this country is I mean, Zioness
Miller, guys, that's what he's acting for, is
clearly driving this agenda through this country, and
that's what this comes back to.
The Intercept put this out on 08/21/2021.
Little known software can trigger revocation of citizenship.
Now
I think this is really important because this
is literally what we're talking about today as
Trump initiates. This is meant to reflect back
on the show we just did yesterday. Right?
This is about the software that can be
used to rapidly go through and just decide
whether or not somebody can be denaturalized.
Now this is one element of this. I'm
of the mind that we're watching an AI
like, the AI addition to this,
like, on overdrive. And I think we're about
to see whatever they roll out from that.
But I thought this was worth understanding
the way this works. Now it says the
Department of Homeland Security
can scan the records of millions of immigrants,
can automatically flag naturalized Americans to potentially have
their citizenship revoked based on secret criteria
according to documents review reviewed by The Intercept.
And the point here, guys, is this become
this has become shockingly more relevant because of
the new memo
and the clear direction they're taking. Prioritizing
removing citizenship from US citizens.
That's the point. And so knowing that they
have secret
criteria on which they and they use this
Atlas software to decide whether or not you're
one of the possible people
should be pretty unnerving.
Shouldn't it be the constitution?
Should it be the legal boundaries of this
country? No. It's secret criteria your government decided.
Yeah. That's where we are today. I mean,
this is for 2021.
It says the software known as ATLAS
takes information from immigrants' cases, files, and runs
it through various federal databases.
Atlas looks for indicators that someone is dangerous
or dishonest or is ostensibly designed
to detect fraud among people who come into
the contact with The US immigration system. But
advocates for immigrants believe that the real purpose
of the computer program is to create a
pretext to strip people of citizenship.
Clearly, we're seeing this come to pass. Right?
And this is my point about how it
hands off the administration to administration. This is
Biden's administration.
Now it says whatever the motivation, Atlas' intended
outcome is ultimately deportation
judging from the documents which originate with DHS
and were obtained by the Open Society Justice
Initiative and Muslim Advocates through Freedom of Information
Act lawsuits.
Now I think there was
no. I thought there was a different. I
just but this is exactly what we're talking
about yesterday. Right? This idea of just rapidly
the not just passports, but that's the way
you can see it in the larger sense.
It's, you know, more about you know, it
would amount to whatever identification you have that
says you're a US citizen. There was another
image. I thought it was up there. Where
were we?
It says, Atlas helps them
investigate
immigrants' personal relationships,
backgrounds.
Now you're this is what I as I
was reading this before, I kept telling myself
it's important to hear understand,
as they say immigrants, that we're talking about
people with US citizenship
today. Like, this is the point I'm making
because Atlas is used to go after people
that are being denaturalized.
Right? And under other context, but in the
context of yesterday's show and the idea of
removing US citizenship. Right? So as we're talking
about this and as we're talking about them
investigating relationships and backgrounds and different things, we're
talking about a US citizen.
So that that's my point of why that
is because if we're talking about somebody who
is here illegally,
most people think differently about that despite the
constitutional rights being the same, which is, again,
what people still seem to not grasp, but
is the truth.
So here,
ask yourself if it's okay with you
that any government or any administration rather within
this government
is choosing to go, okay. How about that
person? Right? And then the question is we'll
get into is why?
What was the what was the impetus? Now
the the plot the Atlas software is ultimately
what does this, but the question is that
there might be starting points like ethnicity,
where you came from, or your religion,
which is absolutely the problem in all this.
Right? And this is where we get into
with these past discussions. Now people in partisan
fields seem to think that's somehow okay, you
know, until later becomes your ethnicity and your
religion, and then it causes matter. It's that's
the point, guys. They these are things that
we should not allow to happen.
But so back to the point. A US
citizen who happens to be from a foreign
country who gained citizenship over the process,
they start digging through their personal relationships, their
background. They're examining their biometric information,
like fingerprints, and in certain circumstances,
considering an immigrant's race, ethnicity, and national origin.
Doesn't that feel like over the like, if
you're already here and you're not breaking the
law, doesn't that seem like an over the
top thing to do?
Not just over the top, more of a
justification to do it to everybody is where
I'm going with this. It draws information from
a variety of unknown sources.
Plus, two that have been criticized as being
poorly managed. The FBI's terrorist screening database, also
known as the terrorist watch list, which, guys,
people like me are on that list. People
like I mean, people in the independent media
have been proven to have been put on
that list. So let's understand how flimsy these
things can be. And it says,
and the National Crime Information Center, powered by
servers at tech giant Amazon.
The system in 2019
alone conducted 16,500,000
screenings and flagged more than a 120,000
cases of potential fraud or threats to national
security and public safety.
It says Atlas should be considered as suspect
until it's shown to not generate unfair, arbitrary,
and, excuse me, discriminatory results.
Almost every time we've seen this something like
this rolled out or like the facial scan
technology,
it almost always seems to have this slant
towards a certain ethnicity. That's not my opinion.
That's what the stats have shown. And they
come out and go, okay. Well, there's a
problem.
It seems to not be able to differentiate
between, you know, black people or Asian people
or whatever it is.
Then you can call that racism or you
can just call it a glitch in the
system. The point is that these things are
still used
despite that. Now they'll claim, oh, but we
don't use it to define, you know, to
make the choice. But, yeah, in a lot
of cases, it turns out that is the
case when you look back. But it says
from what we are able to scrutinize in
terms of the end results, like the disparate
impact of naturalization
based on national origin
Or excuse me, denaturalization. Oh, so in removing
US citizenship
based on where you come from. There is
an ample reason to consider Atlas a threat
to naturalized
citizens.
Again, prescient. Right? This is where we're at
right now. This is what is happening.
Some critics believe it's no accident that Atlas
could go after individual immigrants for flimsy reasons.
The, quote, the whole point of Atlas is
to screen and investigate so that the government
can deny applications or refer for criminal civil
immigration enforcement.
The Department of Homeland Security refuses to disclose
to the public, to you,
how exactly Atlas works
or what rules it uses to determine when
an immigrant should be flagged to potentially have
their citizenship revoked.
But we're not gonna show you how that
works. So it's this and plenty of other
points that make me go, especially today.
Right? From this point to today,
how how is Palantir
not involved with this since they're like things
like this?
Which we show you a lot, we talk
about this, right? Palantir's
immigration OS.
Not the same thing, this is about facial
scans, biometrics, and being able to identify where
you are, which is everybody all the time,
despite what they're saying.
So
today, with what is how it's being used
and who's holding all these levers and how
that secret, it feels very reminiscent to what
we've seen before, like with Palantir and and,
what was it? The I think it was
the IEA or the different platforms that are
saying, you know, it's proprietary
and you can't look at how it works
even though you're relying on its answers seems
ridiculous to me, especially as you have a
group like this who's got a strategic partnership
with a group committing genocide in the world.
That's very influent you know, in full infiltrating
everywhere it can in the world.
It says to go on, the secrecy makes
it nearly impossible to tell whether Atlas is
targeting immigrants baselessly or not.
Atlas appears to scrutinize not just individual immigrants,
but also their wider social networks. So, again,
American citizens.
Doesn't it start to get I mean, I
shouldn't even ask the question. It is a
violation. You're getting to the point where you're
crossing over into speech and and and ideology.
Like, this because you post something today
about Palestine,
the argue that you can go, well, they're
like, you hid this from your from your
paperwork ten years ago? Hit what? That you
I mean, you can't develop your opinion about
supporting a group that's being genocided? Or even
if you did not mention that you support
Palestine, Like, they're this is what they're using
to get people out of this country today.
A 2016
privacy assessment of the FDNSDS
said that ATLAS
visually displays linkages or relationships among individuals to
assist in identifying
non obvious relationships
with a potential nexus to criminal or terrorist
activities.
Well, there's a comment down below that makes
a point about this, but the non obvious
so in other words, you could argue that
it might not necessarily mean what they think
it means.
Like, through a second person that they don't
they don't know, right, or a friend that
they both share but don't know each other.
That is what can, and as the article
points out, has been used to remove people.
Amazon Web Services, the cloud computing division of
the large online retailer,
was hosting Atlas as of 2020, which I
just think is indictment of it in and
of itself, Amazon, or any of these groups
involved. The that arrangement is one of many
instances in which Amazon has sold its services
to a controversial Homeland Security initiative targeting immigrants.
Now it says, immigrants come into the into
contact with Atlas according to the 2020 privacy
assessment when one presents him or herself to
the USCIS
for some reason,
of which there are many, when new derogatory
information is associated with the individual in one
or more of US government systems, or according
to the 2016 privacy document, whenever the FDNS
performs an administrative investigation.
This apparently can happen even after an immigrant
related decision has been made,
meaning
you've been you've been given citizenship, for example,
and they can come back later and say,
wait. Wait. Wait. This new thing that happened.
Now it says among the FOIA documents share
shared with The Intercept
is a USCIS memo noting that Atlas is
used to detect fraud patterns in immigration benefit
filings,
either pre or post adjudication,
suggesting that an immigrant could be subjected to
algorithmic scrutiny indefinitely
after filing is approved.
So you're never really an American citizen if
you've never were born here, which some Americans
think. I disagree.
Once the system is triggered, Atlas and so
does the constitution, by the way. Once the
system is triggered, Atlas eventually decides whether to
flag the immigrant
in question.
But it's unclear
exactly how it arrives at that decision. Now
don't forget, even if you have US citizenship
and you're from another country, you're considered an
immigrant, guys. That's but most people today think
of that as illegal because they've been propagandized
to do so.
How Atlas reasons that is, its decision making
algorithm
is secret.
Mentioned more than once in this, and I
think it is also very relevant.
And although DHS documents list a handful of
data types Atlas can potentially search,
they do not indicate what sort of personal
information
Atlas will churn through to reach its decision.
Don't you think we have a right to
know that as American citizens?
The 2020 privacy document states vaguely that, quote,
Atlas contains a rules engine that applies pattern
based algorithms to look for indicators of fraud,
public safety, and national security concerns.
That's the real catch. Whatever they decide to
frame it as can be whatever they want.
A process described as predictive.
Well, there you go. We're in precrime level
across the board right now. It gives little
information about these rules, but does state that
it is permissible to use Atlas to target
immigrants by race
and ethnicity
in ex ex in, exceptional instances, which, again,
will be whenever they want it to be
if they claim.
A term left glaringly undefined.
Atlas could be used to target certain ethnic
groups or nationalities in exceptional circumstances
or should DHS deem it a security need,
which we know can apply to any situation.
Appealing to murky notions of national security and
fraud is a long standing tactic of the
post nine eleven Homeland Security apparatus,
and one that has historically permitted the state
to justify efforts to harass or target marginalized
communities in The US under the auspices of
public safety or quite frankly, anybody.
Anybody. Any any ethnicity. Any group.
It says legal scholars and technologists have widely
criticized attempts to use software
in a general sense to predict national security
threats,
arguing
that terrorism is so statistically rare as to
be impossible to foresee by drawing patterns
from a person's biology.
Now these are not, you know, like, a
partisan opinion. These are Scott legal expert technology
experts who are simply saying based on the
data points and then how how rare in
a sense of just every other action happening
that these things are that you just can't
those patterns won't make doesn't make sense. And
that doesn't matter. You see, because it's not
about the pattern. It's about using this to
supplement what they want to do.
That's not my opinion. Look back through history.
Look at how they've applied everything they've used.
Same way.
In the 2020 privacy document does little to
dispel worries that Atlas is making potentially life
ruining decisions on the basis of bad data.
The document states that Atlas' output is subject
to manual review by the agents who use
it, which is crazy to me in which
it can be manipulated.
It also notes that the accuracy of Atlas'
input is taken as a given.
UCIS, quote, presumes the information submitted is accurate.
The document states Atlas's output is subject to
manual review,
but then at the same time, their underlings
are supposed to take it at face value.
That sounds easily manipulated, but let's just pretend
like that's not what our intelligence apparatus would
ever do. The document further notes that Atlas
does not employ any mechanisms that allow individuals
to amend erroneous information.
So alternatively,
if they know something's false, so think about
what they just said that they're
per a manual review. So apparently all that
means is they can alter it
in a way that
is, I guess, whether correct or not, alter
it. But then at the same, if they
come back and see that it's wrong, they're
not allowed to change that.
It sounds like it's made to be whatever
they want it to be, whenever they want
it to be. And it says,
and suggests that individuals directly contact the offices,
maintaining various databases that they use if they
wish to correct the error. And as they
point out rightly, the notion that someone struggling
to navigate The US immigration system would have
the wherewithal or add the finances, which is
technically included in that statement, to personally negotiate
a correction of the FBI terrorist screening database
or have an opportunity to learn of such
an error to begin
with, they say it's questionable. I say it's
asinine. To argue that, one, these people have
the wherewithal, meaning just, you know, the resources,
the knowledge, everything, to be able to wage
that battle, let alone even know where to
go about it or even know that the
database is what's choosing to deport them. It's
just silly. And we know that this this
is set up so there's no way to
stop it. That's how I see it.
So from 2021,
we're now seeing Trump
can't take the baton from Biden.
Whether he was rolling out this part of
it or not, he was setting this part
of it up, and now Trump is rolling
out the next part.
Palantir OS, again, immigration point. This is all
interconnected, I think. But so that was from
the last point. But overlapping this with the
Bob Dylan point, which I think is also
include you know, these are, remember, just sectional
things I wanna include today.
James Jackson says, new Bob Dylan's upcoming concert
in in, in what's Cologne?
Is that how you pronounce that? Has been
canceled by organizers.
Let's find out.
Like like, Bologna, Bologna.
You know? It's it's it's differently pronounced, but
different by different people.
Let's see. Right here. Cologne. Yeah. It's Cologne.
I wonder if it's pronounced differently in different
parts of the world, though.
Anyway,
so
upcoming concert in Cologne has been canceled by
organizers.
Glenn Greenwald says, LOL. Remember when people pretended
to care about cancel culture?
This is why I appreciate him. I mean,
I I think he's showing his principles when
he when, you know, whether or not we
disagree on other things, he's clearly showing that
whether it's left or right, he's coming out
and calling it out. I I appreciate that.
Cancel culture, guys? Come on. I mean, really,
like, we can't recognize that this is the
same damn thing what we do. I think
most people see it, but the same people
we've been making fun of the entire show
clearly are not going to call it that.
That's the woke right. There's the woke left.
Now what's funny is there's, like, this weird
sub art thing going on where there's, like,
a whole another argument or, like, definition of
what the woke right is that allows them
to act like it's not true. We're not
talking about anything other than cancel culture of
identity politics using
hate speech to suppress people's speech.
I mean, it's everywhere you look on both
sides of the left, right of the woke
politics. It's what we're seeing everywhere. And he
simply says, like so many purported beliefs and
principles, it has massive Israel exception at the
heart of it.
He sees it.
Isn't this what JD Vance lectured and chided
Europe and Germany and UK specifically for doing?
Isn't this what Elon Musk made this massive
thing to go after The UK for because
it was a distraction?
Yes. But they don't care now because it's
about what Israel wants in this country and
Trump says it's okay.
On the same note about Bob Dylan,
Asalrod points out musician,
Bob Dylan,
death to genocidal military, death to the IDF.
And New York Times, a scandal.
Interestingly enough, going back to any number of
these thousands of these events before this, where
Israelis marched through New York or through Israel
or anywhere else and said, death to Arabs,
which by the way is, like, everywhere or
where there's the
oh, you know what? That's funny. I thought
she had it. It's it's, here. I can
even bring it up.
See if it brings up real quickly.
Let's see.
Now, I mean, I if I should even
prove this to you. It's very public. But
for those that might not know this yeah.
Here's one right here.
Israeli nationalist disappoint. It's like it's that common.
They just put the first thing. Israeli nationalists
chant death to Arabs in annual Jerusalem Day
March. Now that's in Israel, but I've seen
this in New York. I've seen this in
all over the place. Weirdly, nothing ever happens
about it. Not that I'm saying it should.
It's free speech. But it's funny how it's
applied one way or the other. So the
point,
as you already got, is that Israeli say
death to Arabs, the New York Times says
raises tensions.
So ridiculous. But that's the stat this is
the same point, but I just didn't see
that it said it explicitly.
Yeah. See, the way they write it, Israelis
marched through Jerusalem raising tensions.
The annual parade, that's the same point. But
it says, Israeli seen a celebration, Palestinians considered
insult, and was marred by incitement against Arabs.
Oh, you mean saying death to Arab? Yeah.
That that's what it was. But the point
is, raises tensions versus scandal.
You know, that's just ridiculous.
Obviously, there's a one-sided game being played here,
which you already know.
Here is Richard Medhurst.
Sniping kids in the head, gang raping prisoners,
bombing hospitals,
bulldozing cemeteries, abducting doctors, killing journalists, killing UN
staff, bombing UN hostages or Israeli hostages, using
prisoners as human shields, mauling or raping people
with dogs, blowing up homes,
Israel, by the way. But, yeah, let's condemn
and investigate some unsettling chance at a festival
instead.
That's how stupid this is. Especially since we're
talking about speech, guys, and I just don't
know what world we're in where we pretend
that that like, I'm again, same point. You
have people on the right who are cheering
on, I think, DC drain on the rest.
We're going, yeah. Trump, call him
out. When that is exactly in the exact
same principle, what you were saying is going
to destroy the country or the worst thing
I because you guys either don't know that
you're doing the same thing, which is crazy,
or you're hypocrites.
Kind probably both as usual. Muhammad Shehada says,
remember when the New York Times told us
wishing death to army soldiers is the most
natural thing possible?
Because, quote, there's a subconscious understanding that this
soldier will no longer be able to kill
their loved ones?
They added an expert's call to make, quote,
incendiary bombs out of empty bottles to channel
their anger and hate into something useful.
What changed? Right? Here's what it says. When
people are happy about the death of Russian
soldiers, it is inexplicable, she said. There's a
subconscious understanding that the soldier will no longer
be able to kill their loved ones. The
point
is that people will go out of their
way to make something make sense when they
want it to, but then go after people
they don't like. And it's hypocrisy
every which way.
This one's interesting.
This is going back to Zoran,
Mamdani.
Representative
Andy Ogle says
Mamdani was a card carrying member of the
Democrat Socialists of America before he became a
citizen, which as far as I understand is
not a crime.
I think it's just as ridiculous and disgusting
as any person that believes in a government
led society. Well, that's my opinion. Right? But
the point
is that that ties back to the idea
of deportation.
Remember communism?
Those are the they conflate the two.
And
national security threat. Right? I'm telling you, this
is we're gonna see movement here. My opinion,
but, I mean, Trump's already
screaming about this. So he's simply going, look.
Look. Look. He believes in this kind of
politics, and we're all supposed to pretend like
that's the worst thing ever even though it's
just one more form of government that will
all lead all of them
to concentration of power and control of your
lives. I mean, are we not paying attention
to this so called democracy?
People are just willfully blind. But he goes,
if he checked no, which I'll show you
what it reads, on his n 400 form,
when he asked when he when when asked
about associations with a communist party, he then
he lied.
Well, again, you realize that communism and socialism
aren't the same thing. Now, yeah, they're very
clearly similar. It's just funny to me how
everything is nothing, nothing means everything when they
want it to.
Get a plane ready. He might be going
back.
You have an American representative
saying this about an American citizen who just
got
was primary. He won the primary in New
York.
And they are trying to get him deported
because of his political opinions. Guys, this is
America 2025,
or let's be clear, America, and we're finally
seeing it.
But they're finally doing things that I think
of crossing that line. But here's the document
he's talking about.
It says, been a member of, involved in,
or in any way associated with any communist
or totalitarian
party
anywhere in the world. Okay.
Well, who else can we think of that's
a totalitarian party right now? I mean, you
could say Saudi Arabia. You could say Israel
that most people in this country in our
government are associated with in some way. But
you see, it's selected outrage towards things that
they like, first of all, because you have
a car you are part of the socialist
of America, does not then mean that you're
necessarily part of some specific,
totalitarian communist or totalitarian
party. But he says and this is my
point. It's subjective. There's no facts involved. It's
about the allegation.
But then it says, advocated,
supported, or promoted any of the following or
or been a member of, involved in, or
in any way associated with any group anywhere
in the world that advocated any of the
following. Opposition to all organized government. Oh, here
you go. That's me. That's anybody who realizes
government's a problem, but now they're trying to
create that opinion as somehow, you know, anything
that goes against what is their control structure,
that you're a terrorist.
I'm not calling for any I'm actively every
day calling for no violence. That's the whole
point, but it doesn't matter to them if
you check that box. World communism.
I don't I'm I mean, again, I'm not
immersed in his opinions. First of all, again,
that that's not something that's a crime. But
secondarily, the idea that he has his opinions,
I I you tell me, is that something
that's well documented, or are they just trying
to conflate these things? It says the establishment
in The United States of a totalitarian dictatorship,
the overthrow by force or violence or other
unconstitutional means of the government of the United
States. The unlawful assault or killing
of officers
of the government.
Sabotage.
Unlawful damage of property.
Well, you could list off of quite a
few examples where that's been done to The
United States by a certain foreign country, by
certain foreign assets.
I'm talking about many examples.
US' liberty,
attacks on American citizens, and lots of different
discussions by Israel.
Those things don't matter. I even pointed out
that in the actual discussion we went over
of the denaturalization
point, that one of the main things is
supposedly if you are part of a foreign
military, but that doesn't apply if it's Israel,
right?
Here's what,
whatever this guy's number name is, 2B7C.
He says 5B,
Right?
Advocated sabotage and
advocated unlawful killing of any officer of any
organized government means all Israeli and pro Israel
naturalized citizens can be deported.
Not hard to understand what we're talking about
here. But see, it's selectively applied.
But overall, whether you think it you know,
it's not about that too or the point
is only about him in this context. That's
just making the case that they're hip they're
hypocrites. Not that that invalidates the other side
of it. But the point is that what
they're pointing out there
is trying to get this citizen deported because
of his ideas. I I no matter how
else you spin that, that's insane when you
recognize where we are and where we come
from.
And realize that this has been building. Okay?
Do Do you realize where we this what
remember this just happened.
Elon Musk, this is not okay. And watch
the videos of this very clearly organized shoot
with these guys waving the flag in front
of a car where he's basically encircled by
journalists taking pictures, and I don't see a
pro it's just like it's so and the
Mexican flag? I mean, of course, this is
when you got the morons like Stephen Miller
rushing out and calling it a Mexican invasion,
even though twenty seconds before that, it was
Americans who should be deported because they were
supporting Palestine
or Hamas. So which is it? You can't
just switch into they're all Mexicans invading us
because that guy has a Mexican flag. It's
because they needed to warp this into something
about an invasion because that's how they made
this make sense, whether it's the deportation. They
need to claim the Insurrection Act. He called
it an insurrection himself,
Zionist Miller.
I simply said you're being played, guys.
It's very clear. And all of this is
to drive you into the position to think
that this is happening, like, that we're being
invaded for and and what's funny is in
the only in any other point other than
the one that's obvious.
We talked about it here. Trump's use of
the Alien Enemies Act declared unlawful.
LA's orchestrated chaos and Israel's propaganda.
Now here's what Dan Bongino had to say,
which I just think is interesting. Like, I
may I maybe he just is not popping
up in my feed, which, you know, is
weird how these things oscillate, which shows you
how they want and don't want things to
be seen. And, you know,
I don't follow these people. Right? You could
tell that. But for some weird reason, sometimes,
he's all over my feed and sometimes not.
That's them, the algorithmic to control,
deciding what they want you to see for
whatever reason. That's what that is. It's not
a secret. It's not a conspiracy. It's exactly
the reality.
Dan Bongino
suddenly comes into my feed and says this.
And what's funny is he I I my
point was I kinda feel like he did
kinda just got quiet for a minute, but
maybe I just wasn't seeing it because
him and Cash, they like, they lost, guys.
Their whole team turned against them because they
were lying to you. And everybody in the
Epstein files or or nine eleven, it was
pretty embarrassing. And it got, like, almost roundly
called other than the typical Jones and Johnsons
and, you know, who came out and we're
supporting them or what, and I stand with
them even though I disagree.
Everybody else came most part were calling it
out. And so now he comes out with
adding to the sleeper cell point. As promised
he says.
I wanna provide an update on our efforts
to defend the homeland and protect the American
people from foreign intelligence agents.
This is your FBI, and you deserve to
know. Now let me clear again as always.
I would never doubt that these are happening
or possible, but I just find it interesting
at this time when I've never seen so
much foreign inter interference in my life from
obvious.
And what this has becomes is a focal
point on everything else. And I don't see
any evidence to back it up.
Like, again, I I unless this I I
don't unless they put out a memo that
I didn't see. Like, when he posts this,
why wouldn't you include the link that backs
up what you're saying?
Unless it doesn't exist. My point is
you could list off a bunch of people
and things you did without any ever proving
it because the people that support you won't
ask for that. This is Twitter files. It's
what it is. But he says, this is
your FBI, and you deserve to know about
the work we're doing.
And, also, I think even if it is
pulling away from the things that they've not
doing,
Epstein files. Today, we announced two arrests and
and the and the execution of eight search
warrants in San Francisco, Houston, Portland, San Diego.
I mean, how much you wanna bet this
has to do with what else is going
on, and this is more of an overlap?
As part of our disruption of a sophisticated
Chinese government agent ring trying to recruit US
military service members. Yeah. I mean, again, that
problem that guy willing to bet you that
stuff's happening everywhere in the world. Not that
it's okay and not that we should ignore
it, but just my point is that I
would love to see that proven. I'd love
to see who it is, see his face,
know how it happened, how it went down,
how you got the information.
It says we we are mission focused on
keeping our nation's secrets, technology, and data out
of the hands of foreign intelligence agents except
Israel.
You're literally handing the stuff on a silver
platter to Israel, either literally to Israel or
through Palantir or through Trump or through Elon
Musk or through the thousand different unit a
200 companies that run this country.
He doesn't care about that or doesn't
know. That's crucial to protecting Americans' military and
technological advantage over adversaries
like China, Ra Ra Ra and Russia, North
Korea.
Since the beginning of 2025, we have arrested
51 foreign intelligence agents for act activities
including spying, stealing, harassing, stealing, bro. Okay. But
I don't see anything else listed off. I
see one list or one point of one
Chinese ring and then a general statement of
a 51 people.
I look, I don't see any evidence to
back it up. But again, I could miss
things. I this wasn't super deep for me
today.
I just if let's if you have information
on those 51 people, I would love to
see it. I'd love to see who they
are, where they come from, what the charges
are. Matters, doesn't it?
Because look, just like anything else, guys, the
point is your government can accuse people of
everything.
They have to prove their claims. I don't
care who it's about. The point is that
if they're able to accuse people of a
crime, they need to present the evidence of
that crime to us. So we know they're
being honest about it. That's the point.
There's a lot more work to be done.
He says, we have nearly 5,000 open counterintelligence
investigations. How much you wanna bet two people
that are talking about Palestine or criticizing Israel
or don't like the war in Iran?
But you get the point.
Oh, I think I thought I had something
commented on that. I guess not.
But oh, and that's what it was. A
lot of people underneath it. Oh, that oh,
that's what it was. It was below. Sal
Diagoras says, we don't care. Give us the
damn list, which is
almost the most common comment down there from
his own supporters.
I think one more here.
Oh, that was the one right there. So
this is Anne Vandersteel
saying, but zero democrat traders. Did I get
that right? And she's a Trump supporter.
The point is you promised that people would
the Fauci's, the Bill Gates, the people that
you keep telling us were a deep deep
excuse me, hiccups all of a sudden.
Deep state pedophiles
that were somehow,
you know,
using USAID to do all the they're all
doing that.
But you told us that they were the
they were the criminals, and you were fighting
the deep state. We're gonna drain the swamp,
and then not even a name gets released?
Not one person gets arrested?
Yeah. So you lied then. Or you knew
that and don't care to stop it. I
Only two things that make sense to me.
And so she goes,
what about everything else? No. But over here,
Stephen Miller says, every single promise,
Zionists tell you.
John Rich says, this effort is what I
voted for.
Yeah. Of course, they do because that's what
I'm talking about. That's the rah rah, whatever
Trump just said is exactly what I think
today.
And lastly
or, like, actually, I a few foreign policy.
A few points that I wanted you to
see that we shouldn't
miss.
Michael Tracy says today, and this was yesterday,
is today is the Christians United for Israel
annual lobby day in DC.
Pastor, despite the fact that it's pretty obvious
today, at least, that they roundly dislike Christians,
but I guess that doesn't matter. I mean,
there's
pastors, Christian,
priests in
Israel will publicly tell you they spit at
their feet when they walk by. Just this
is just this is about Zionism. It's not
about Christianity in my opinion. Pastor John Hagee
calls for the regime change in Iran. There
you go. And says his followers will be
lobbying for this. It's long past time to
do what makes Iran great again?
Thank God for you, Donald Trump.
So again, are we under the mind that
America's already great again? Have we succeeded in
everything we promised? Then why are we pretending
that we should start helping Iran?
That's clearly then that would mean that means
America's second. Right? I mean, come on, guys.
On top of the fact that obviously, regime
change for Iran is not something any Christian
should be the idea of regime it's war.
That's violence. That's starvation. That's suffering. That's human
trafficking. It happens every single time we see
a conflict like this. And we're gonna pretend
like this is what men of god should
be calling for? No. This is men of
politics.
Religious politics? Still politics.
Now this is an overlapping point that I've
actually let me see where how much we
got left. I'm gonna show quote you show
you that other way. I wanna give some
of this more detail I'm thinking. Maybe I'll
jump into it on the next show.
Now I let me get through it. These
these are some points that I said I
would get to
where we're at. Oh, we're under three. Short
for us. Alright. So just and I'll just
go through some of these reasonably quickly. This
point was not very long.
This article came out yesterday, and it says
they have no way to discriminate or they
have no way to discriminate.
Again, this is a Western media report about
what's happening in Iran, and it says, Iran
rounds up hundreds for execution as bad hijab
is enough to be labeled as a spy.
Now as best I can tell with a
lot of this, this is grossly misrepresented.
The point though is that I'm not gonna
say that Iran or any government
is not capable of going after people for
frivolous reasons or just because they're wanna control
what you think. They're government, guys. I do
not support these governments, but I do support
the peoples in these countries. And if they
support that, that's their choice. The point is
not that being whatever they the government they
support.
The reality here
is that
a lot is going on that justifies Iran
or any country that's been attacked in the
way they are. Imagine The United States
gets bombed by a foreign country, and then
you find out that they use sleeper cells,
which is a public thing. Right? They that
was admitted by Israel, publicly discussed by Iran.
They had these groups that were that were
sleep they're, dormant in Iran that that by
the way, Roberts was telling you for years,
and they they jumped up in the middle
of this and were one the ones that
caused a lot of the a lot of
the damage in the civilian locations.
And if that happened in The United States,
and all of a sudden they were attacked,
and all of a sudden you found out
there were sleeper cells everywhere, which is what
they're really trying to push on you now
to get you to think, you know, that
they're priming you,
what do you think Trump would do?
What do you think even if it even
it was just the alley gate? You know
what they would do. They would chew it.
They would use it to do everything they
always wanted to do, even if someone felt
justified. Right? Scanning everybody, proving everyone's identity, making
sure you're not all secret Iranian spies or
whatever it is.
You know it. Left or right, they do
it every time. So my point is not
to rationalize any illegal thing that happened, any
crimes committed against anybody, this should all be
called out. But understanding that what they're doing
in some cases, it appears to me, even
if it's over the top, which should be
called out,
is because of Israel's infiltration.
Let's go through some of these points I
think is interesting. But the overarching point here
is that I they're all capable of doing
things, and if they do so, they should
be held accountable for it. Anybody that, you
know, violates the right to somebody or, you
know, executes a person because of their beliefs
anywhere in the world, nobody should be okay
with that. Now it says, following the recent
short but but I should add, in no
way should we be the outside country going,
this is what we do because of what
you're that we decide for you because of
these actions. The people of the countries decide
these things. That's the reality. Now whether or
not you agree with the international system, which
I have plenty of grievances about it, the
point would be that if they suddenly don't
care, right, the government there, you know, that
this is something they can go to the
international community about. Not to then have them
invade the country. Right? But to then get
support from foreign countries that can help them
execute that plan. But that is how they
abuse it today. They manufacture that, right? They
pretend there's a revolution. They pretend there's shootings
and they wanna help them. So, I don't
have an answer to that. Trust me, that's
convoluted. But there is still the right path
to take and there is still a way
it can happen to where they can decide.
We just gotta stop following for all these
government lies.
Question everything, look for facts, verify.
But the point is following the recent short
but intense conflict with Israel and Iran as
as if it's somehow not happening now, this
has been ongoing for a long time, authorities
have launched a widespread security crackdown.
This has resulted in hundreds of arrests and
several executions.
This large scale operation is meant to reestablish
control after the conflict revealed the deeply the
the how deeply Israeli intelligence had infiltrated Iran
with physical people.
So executions. Yeah. That might that sounds extreme.
And I I agree. I'm not I know
actually don't believe in in
death penalty quite frankly for just about any
case. But the point
here
is that as we said the other day,
if you're a spy, most countries have that
as, you know, whether treason or whatever the
claim would be as the death penalty.
And I even argue I think that's what
they say in this article. There's some of
the articles that that's what they've been put
they put back into place because of what's
happening.
Now whether you agree with it or not,
the point is you understand the idea of
of holding spies accountable that just executed civilians
in the middle of your in middle of
Washington DC, you know, in the sense of
what happened in Tehran.
That's what happened. And so it goes on
to say, in the week after the ceasefire
ceasefire,
security forces set up checkpoints in Tehran and
other major cities, urging citizens to report anything
suspicious.
At the same time, Iran's parliament,
intro introduced
an emergency bill proposing harsher punishments for espionage,
including death penalty.
The judiciary also announced plans to create special
courts to speed up trials for the accused
of being traders and mercenaries. Now this is
my point. Governments, like your government, take advantage
and use this to crack down on people
they don't like. And in many cases, take
it well, do it to people that don't
deserve it, and I'm not okay with that.
But that's this is the this is what
we're trying to solve in this country and
the same thing we're trying to solve there.
The point is that all of this in
some ways are happening because of what we're
doing. Because we're it well, you have to
understand from their perspective whether it's being abused
or not. You've got people who are infiltrating
their country, illegally bombing their country, illegally sanctioning
their country, illegally, you know, infiltrating them with
groups on the ground, carrying out attacks within
the country, assassinating your scientists. I mean, at
what point do you have to at least
understand why you might be obsessively
paranoid crackdown like they're in here because they
are?
Not to not to be okay with any
crime, just to understand why they might make
those choices.
A spokesperson for the just judiciary
said more details about the arrest and specific
charges will be released soon, only stating a
number of people suspected of spying for the
Zionist regime have been identified and cases filed
against them.
That I mean, this is this is the
whole point. So what they're saying here is
that ultimately, they have arrested people because they're
spies. Now then you got the Zionist narrative
that says that they're just killing innocent people,
which almost never is the reality,
in Iran or anywhere else we're talking about.
I mean, I can prove that over the
years that they make these bombastic claims,
but that's not to say there are not
crimes being committed, which is what I've said
that first for. But they're coming out over
the top with claims we've seen. And if
and, oh, my point was about the bad
hijab point. I mean, these are coming from,
you know, analysts and people from this country
discussing what's going on and the idea of
it being you know, having your heat job
in the wrong spot, being that's why they
I don't believe that. I'm just gonna flatly
say because I've already shown you examples of
people that the the law of wearing that,
the morality police point about the heat job
is is many places, not largely not enforced.
That's why you could see women wandering around
the in Iran with no hijab on, people
protesting.
It's you're being misled in a very, very
strong way. And so the idea that that
would be the case, it just doesn't doesn't
make sense to me. But that they would
go after an Iranian citizen that may just
be not so friendly to their government,
but may that's nothing to do with Israel.
Right? But maybe doesn't like the way they're
governing, and they go after them because they're
and they you know, we're getting Israeli spies.
They go, you know, grab him too because
he doesn't like us. 100%. I think any
government would do that, and we should call
it out.
Now Iran has charged two French nationals with
spying for Israel, which is interesting to me
because if, you know, if your argument is
that they're just killing people,
yet here they put them through process and
they present evidence and they charge them with
being spies. I mean, the point is you
can see that there are processes. People are
being charged as opposed to just being sent
to Guantanamo. You know, it's interesting to see
the variances
here. We're it's worth pointing out. Now Iran
shut down airspace over Western central regions. This
was today.
And I think the whole point here is
that they're they're this to me could mean
that they're just being protective, but I think
it senses that there's something about to happen.
Because if they shut down the airspace, that
means that they know for sure anything else
coming over is not theirs. Right? And I
think that this today,
I'm I'm worried that I mean, the prediction
as anybody who's been paying attention would put
out is that Israel's going to violate what's
happening, which I'm not gonna call a ceasefire.
I mean, it's
it they're stopped bombing at least for the
moment as far as I could tell, but
the reality being that Israel is still bombing
in every other location they can. And, really,
I think this is about them building up.
They got they lost the exchange that just
happened. That's pretty clear to anybody that's being
honest about it. And so this is about
them regaining their footing and they're gonna come
back. So the point is, when they want
to, they'll initiate this, which they've done every
single time before, in my opinion. No. They
they'll initiate it this time, in my opinion.
The fact is they've done it every time
before. So interesting that they're doing that. I
think this signifies more coming.
China,
and long before this, by the way, has
said similar statements that it's, you know, their
national security interest to support Iran. But they
have come out recently and said they stand
with Iran and called out Israel's lies and
hypocrisy.
That's I think that's important.
When something that China stands up and takes
your back, that dramatically changed the situation. Now
doesn't mean that China's gonna step in militarily
when something happens. We saw that in other
dynamics, but that that's to be determined. But
it will
play a factor on the mindset of the
other countries involved.
This was on the June 26. Iran's defense
minister thanks China for support on first foreign
trip since Israel conflict. And it's showing that
they've already been overlapping before this, you know,
about this kind of discussion in the first
place, which tells me that Iran has sensed
this was coming and China is, you know,
primed.
This was on the twenty third. China says
US attack has on on Iran has damaged
its credibility.
This was from the July 1, and this
was just overlapping with the Strait Of Hormuz
point that I think speaks
in the opposite direction of what people try
to say about this country.
Iran made prepare preparations to mine to put
explosive mines in the Strait Of Hormuz.
Now
the reality, which the point is they made
preparations.
If you remember what happened,
there were there were calls to shut down
the Strait Of Hormuz, which they control that
waterway. It's been one of the biggest issues
about the whole thing of the Bab El
Mandev straight in Yemen and why they're trying
to find ways to get around that.
I mean, you know, they're willing to starve
entire countries to find a way to get
around that.
The point is that it went through their
their their their,
governmental process,
And they voted They didn't they didn't do
it, which is just it's crazy to me
that, you know, so Iran or rather Trump
and Israel can unilaterally bomb a foreign country
with no congressional approval. And then they'll discuss
doing this and then decide not to and
go through a governmental process.
And then clearly, the point is they even
have preparations in line, but didn't do it.
So which means
restraint run over, which is always what I
show you, but also that they have a
process.
And not even Trump had a process here.
It just it just shows you that we're
clearly going in the wrong direction.
Now, this is fascinating to me, and I
think there's gonna be more to come from
this. This was from the sec from today.
And this was a, group of Iranian hackers,
which, by the way, does not mean that
it's from Iran. I mean, this could be
they could be not actually Iranian hackers. They're
pretending to be. They could be from Iran,
but not be working for Iran, or they
could be Israelis pretending to be Iran. You
know, don't buy buy into the way things
are presented until you can prove it. But
there's been many examples of Iranian hackers. But
in what they're aiming at and what they're
stating, it does suggest that it's not from
from, you know, that it's in in
of the mind of people supporting Iran.
Iranian hackers reportedly had access to emails
of chief of staff, Susie Wiles,
and other Trump allies. I find that really
interesting. Iranian hackers are back in the cyber
war, threatening to dump more than a 100
gigabytes. That's a lot of emails
of proprietary information allegedly
pilfered from former Donald Trump campaign.
Remember, Susie Wiles was kind of arguably, like,
the go between in the the whole, like,
Zionist. A lot of the different points. She
was arguably, like, the people called her, like,
his handler for a while. I mean, like,
people in the know, like, that recognized how
she was sort of dictating when things were
happening.
So what do they know? What do they
have? What emails do they show, and what
information does that give us? I'm super interested.
Because I think if it shows you that
there's more
back channels with other, you know remember, this
was as they were building out their government,
guys, and I think it would show us
a lot. What about the missing ethics pledges?
What was being discussed? I'm really fascinated by
that. The point is we'll have to wait
and see what happens because other than that,
these are just, you know, statements. Maybe it's
all made up. But
I think if it does come out,
I think that there I mean, I don't
wanna guess at it. I mean, I'm interested
because it could ultimately mean something. But I
will also point out that this whole thing
could also be a ploy to get you
thinking that we're getting ready for the cyber
pandemic, you know, the hacks and all that,
which is kind of where the article goes.
But who knows? We'll have to wait and
see.
Now, wait.
Make sure I didn't accidentally close something.
Oh, hold on. Am I doing the wrong
thing?
Oh, there it is. We're open close tab.
Oh, I guess I just lost the highlight.
I didn't think I highlighted that one. Well,
here's what here's some of the things I
highlighted. It was right here. It says in
its second time
that the group has it back back to
the Iran hack point.
The second time that the group has hacked
Trump's inner circle, which is interesting. According to
Gizmodo, the twenty twenty four summer saw the
same hackers breach, so they claim anyway, breach
servers and dump documents into into both president
Biden's staff
and top US media outlets as such such
as New York Times Politico. So the not
partisan. I do that was important. Right? So
it's not just you could argue it's more
of a pointed political thing. It seems just
to be about, you know, all of our
government, which would apply to Israel as much
as Iran, by the way.
And it goes on to say, lastly, in
in a report to Reuters, the hackers assessed
that they have access to internal
emails of some of the Trump Trump's closest
associates,
Susie Susie Wiles, Lindsay Halligan, political friend Roger
Stone, and even messages related to adult film
actress Stormy Daniels,
which seems a little sensational. Maybe that's just
to get people interested, but who knows? Wait
and see what happens.
Now on the point of Gaza and the
last point of foreign policy, just in this
overlap with Iran, and this really is just
sadistically disgusting.
Mohammad Shehadeh points out on the today, Israeli
pilots
finished bombing well, let me make sure this
isn't an old story now that I'm reading
that the time. Yeah. Okay. So this is
this is the
this is so this is when they were
bombing as far as I understand it. The
reason I'm saying this is because I was
making sure this is from today that I
didn't miss the bombing. Let me know in
the chat. Did did I miss Israel bombing
Iran today? I think that will be definitely
relevant. I didn't see that. But he says,
Israeli pilots finished bombing Iran,
had missiles left over,
so they simply dumped them over Gaza, as
they state in the Israeli article, to avoid
waste.
Are we actually of the mind that you
can't just not use them and use them
later? Like, to avoid waste, or you mean
just to continue to be genocidal and, well,
we might as well bomb them while they're
sleeping
in tents while they're starving by the beach
because there's nothing I mean, we realized we
already saw the map. There's nothing else happening.
These people are jammed together, and they're bombing
them in these tents. There's no tunnels. There's
no there's no infrastructure. They're just murdering people
as they try to survive.
It's just absolutely insane.
And the point is they bombed Iran and
just kinda went, okay, let's just dump them
over Gaza on the way home.
That's just the the how blight that is,
how you know, the disregard for people's human
lives grosses me out. It says hundreds of
air strikes, hundreds of massacres, not for strategy,
but just to save resources, to save fuel.
Now, oh, I guess that would make sense
in regard to not coming back, I guess.
Crazy.
In regard to, you know, avoid waste. Says
Gaza as a dump site for war crimes,
full dehumanization.
Insane.
Now Ron Paul with Daniel McAdams came out
yesterday and said just as news comes out
that the IDF commanders
ordered Israeli soldiers to shoot unarmed Palestinians lining
up for food
because that's what got that's directly from Haraz
and plenty of other Israeli platforms. It's a
killing field.
IDF soldiers ordered to shoot deliberately
at unarmed Gazans waiting for humanitarian aid. That's
just
wild to me how obvious this can be.
He says, just as that comes out,
The US announced that it has approved $500,000,000
in new weapons to Israel.
Just the kinds of weapons that are being
used on the Palestinians
who line up for food.
And he goes also today, the the spending
bill spat between Musk and Trump widens. They're
talking about the the division.
I mean, guys, it's just wild to me.
And you you think that most people can't
see this? And Ron Paul, I mean, everybody
other than blind, sick, and fan followers are
aware of this. Everyone in the world for
that matter. It just shows you more clear
than ever what the real problem is. We
need to the people that pretend they represent
you don't represent you.
Now here is a doctor
from June 23 showing you this exact discussion
of a child being shot in the food
line.
So first, the Gillwood project put this out
saying the Gaza Health Foundation,
Mossad, in The US, that's what it's provable
by the way, that turned out they tried
to hide it, but it turned out that's
largely Mossad funding and and support that's going
through this.
And now I remember also that Robert and
I just discussed,
dang it. Let me see if I can
grab it over here. But as Robert and
I just discussed
in in our great interview, by the way,
that's right here.
That
the ISIS linked groups they're using oh,
oh, it's weird. I guess I oh, I
copied the the the text instead of the
link. Here it is.
Robert in the cash interview. What's next for
The US? Israel and Iran? And we we
talk about for a while the groups they're
using that are literally ISIS linked elements that
they're using to to steal the food and
to resell. And these are people that are
now executing Palestinians
as they go for food.
So the claim the g f DHF claims
its a distribution is a feel good story.
Their patients are their their patients
the patients our doctors are seeing tell a
different story.
Like this one and a half year old
girl who was shot by a bullet close
to the GHF's
aid site while in her mother's arms.
Here,
to add to it,
is Tarek Lubani.
This girl was my patient.
He says, I'm surprised how little people, even
medical doctors and keyboard warriors, know about penetrating
gunshot trauma.
Let me explain why this x-ray what this
x-ray means, how it clearly proves this girl
has a gunshot, and why the haters are
so very wrong. I mean, despite seeing a
bullet in her chest.
Of course, all the Zionists will come out
and pop Hollywood and, you know, just anything
you can to deny the reality.
He says, first, there's history and clinical picture.
A one the 1.5 year old girl was
in her mother's arms very near the GHF,
quote, aid site. They opened fire. She was
struck and started screaming. With blood pouring down
her right side, one exam on exam, she
was struggling.
She had this creeps me out, by the
way, but I'm I wanna tell you what
it the the crepitus apparently means
a
a grating sound of or sensation produced by
friction between bone and cartilage and an obvious
entry wound.
The X-ray
shows three clear signs she was shot, bullet,
a chest
tube,
three and three outside
air outside the lung,
which was which was the
crepitus that they felt.
The chest tube is to treat a a
what is it? An air outside the lung
in the chest cavity and was inserted when
The US showed the The US showed decreased
lung sliding.
When wait. The US. I don't understand what
I mean. What that mean by The US
showed?
Oh, oh, I that's right. The the,
whatever. The the what this is right here.
The the what they're doing to scan this
stuff. I chose the X-ray because it is
virtually
striking and clear visually. Excuse me. That's why
the account, the Gila what was it again?
The Gila project.
That's why they posted it. Despite copious evidence
from multiple sources and over a 150 mortalities
at GHF aid sites,
550.
550
mortalities at these supposed aid sites.
Some call the veracity of these images into
question. The keen eyed knew
knew better because but he said that's not
a that oh, and then this is responding
to others. The point was just simply showing
you guys
plenty of other examples. The the evidence is
astounding, and I don't even think I need
to do this. I think anybody out there
that doesn't already know this are people that
are arguing otherwise or people that either already
know it's not true and don't care or
just will never want to hear what you
have to say.
I'm of the mind almost everybody in the
world is shockingly aware of what this is.
Now on top of that, as they decline
food or withhold baby formula, which just got
reported by Almonde,
children are starving to death
every day.
Literally every
day. Here's what she looked like.
There she is now.
Israel's starving children to death.
This is so crazy, guys. I'm starting to
notice, by the way, not just if you
go back and look at old things that
you liked or shared, suddenly your reshares and
your likes have been removed. At least that's
for me. Maybe it's just me. Who knows?
But I'm also noticing, like this, for example,
that I just share I just shared that
the last day I but now it's gone.
Yeah. Welcome to just one more example of
how this platform is in every way you
could imagine corralling and removing and adding and,
you know, controlling the way you view everything.
This is, oh, I forget his name, James
Elder from UNICEF.
This is why Palestinians are not able to
fish and avoid starvation.
We just talked about this. Israel shoots them
indiscriminately.
Now that's what we're reporting in this clip.
They they try to go out and fish,
and they get shot. Not new, in fact,
but now if they even go in the
water, it seems they're getting shot because they
just they're trying to starve them to death.
This is sadistic.
Here are children suffering after they bombed in
their tents while they're trying to find ways
to survive. A child kisses his injured brother
on the head to comfort him after both
were wounded in Israeli's airstrike targeting a shelter
in Gaza City.
Here is a really disturbing video, the savior
points out, of Israelis
mocking
a child that just lost his mother.
And and if you think for one second,
these are unique.
Guys, it is
honestly one of the most prolific things in
this conversation. We've I've seen countless examples of
this exact dynamic.
Here's the video.
You know? And and this is what develop
this is what grows hate in people.
The idea that somebody can be so like,
so there's a child
crying.
How did her mother just got killed by
Israeli bombs, you know, by the people, like,
in those uniforms right there.
And that video goes around, and they take
that video and they make a TikTok of
them making fun of that person suffering. Like,
there's not even, like, a humorous element to
it unless you're a sadistic monster, unless you
are enjoying the suffering of children,
You know? Or you decide to because the
Palestinian is the child and they don't deserve
to live or you know? There's this is
a very clear insight to the kind of
people they are and them right there, not
every Israeli. But, yes, sadly, the evidence is
clear that most of them are of in
a very similar mindset about this. But let's
not forget, there's a good amount of people
in Israel, orthodox Jews and otherwise, they've called
this out every day.
It just makes me sick
that the and and, you know, and we're
gonna
scream death to the IDF or in or
treat Palestine,
and and this is what happens every day.
I mean, just this is undeniable, and they
don't care.
They being the power structures that are still
supporting them.
So last
or on on the segment, then I'm gonna
do I want to go over a couple
of things about the ceasefire.
This is really interesting to me. It just
shows you how
some of these people have just lost the
plot and don't realize that how I mean,
imagine being in a position
where you have supported the genocide.
The whole world can see. You're cheering on
the starvation of children. You're cheering on everything
that's happening, the raping of innocent people, you
know, the whole thing that's going on. Right?
I'm not saying that I know that about
this individual, but the general sentiment of a
lot of people that I mean, how do
you not see what's going on? In fact,
posting it, constantly talking about it, and then
attacking you for pointing it out. The point
is that you have this effort by people
like this guy, Will Sussman,
who tries to turn in
not doing something about what you claim is
happening, which in reality is just people screaming
free Palestine. And I'm not gonna say that
there are not people out there screaming racial
slurs or whatever. That happens to people of
all ethnicities, not any place, in any group.
People are out there that do those things.
That's your choice to allow you to be
affected by that. But his point is here's
the title, of course, by the New York
Post because they'll slosh out any nonsense that
is good about Israel.
He goes, I was chased out of MIT.
Chased out.
And it was all because I'm Jewish.
Here's what he wrote.
It was the privilege of my life to
study computer science at MIT.
But when it became clear that the university
would not protect me
from the ongoing harassment and threats,
I had no choice but to leave my
PhD program and abandon my dream.
Or, you know, you coulda just not done
that.
And because of the privilege
of a lifetime, stuck it out and had
thicker skin or
tried to involve the police if it's an
actual threat. You see, because if it's a
threat, that's actually a crime. But you see,
that's not what's happening. This is people that
are going free Palestine or
Zionist shouldn't be a thing, and them going,
I'm being threatened. It's antisemitism,
and then making a big public statement about
how you're a victim while you're cheering on
a genocide. Or as Hussein says, you abandoned
a PhD boo hoo. Try being a Palestinian
doctor in Gaza watching your hospital get flattened.
Your state is incinerating the Levant. You're not
the victim. You're just loud.
Now to be clear, this person is if
you look at the you know, they're supporting
Israel. So my point though you should point
out though just because you're Jewish does not
make you supporting Israel. I've just keep telling
people there are Jewish people, plenty of them,
that don't support Israel. So don't make that
assumption. But the point is that those that
clearly do and are supporting the actions of
Israel and then try to make mean words
enough to make you the victim of the
day while we just watched a 100 children
starve to death and people get bombed into
pieces. Sorry, bud. It's not gonna work. And
I also just think it's frustrating that we're
gonna try to argue that people saying things
you don't like is forcing you to leave
your PhD.
Right. I mean but what are the old
saying? You know, sticks and stones. And just
it's just funny. Like, I mean, this is
the woke coach the woke culture on the
right. It's the same thing.
Now, the point is,
they've lost control of this narrative. We've seen
this for a long time. And as I
said, in the first week, they've already lost
the information war because it already became apparent
to me. Obvious even more now.
Here's a clip on GB News. And I
think it's hilarious
as as as Abeer points out, the narrative
is falling apart and they're panicking.
I mean, what's the way they respond to
this? And you have to this is insane
to me that we're still at this point
where we're
I mean, what's the how far are we
now? I mean, you know, years beyond
year plus beyond October 7.
And they're still, like,
stopping the conversation to be like, but do
you condemn a mosque? You don't condemn a
mosque? How can you not condemn a mosque?
I mean, it's just wild to me. And
that that there's no moving beyond that. That
that was Piers Morgan's whole thing, and now
he's moved on to pretending to be on
the other side, kind of, because that's what
he does. Mister Fairweather journalist, if you can
call it that. But this
is just embarrassing. And
the the main point for me,
be like this girl.
Stay calm,
be polite,
just stay stay the course because it makes
them look ridiculous
just like this. And And the reality is
she's right, guys. And you know this. We've
watched this show. The argument that they're making
about this didn't start, you know, this started
October 7. I mean, they're literally parroting day
one lines that everybody knows aren't true.
Whoever's a condemnations
for Hamas. Did did the are you saying
that what happened on October was not acceptable?
When you when you do this No. I'm
asking. Another another another You can't ask. Media
do this. Again, it is justified.
Nothing justified Can you ask genocide against the
Palestinian people. I'm I'm here to tell you
exactly what
I think exactly what I think.
I'm not I'm not going to continue to
condemn Hamas. I'm not going to do that.
So you're not going to stand here and
condemn the IDF, the occupation, and the role
of Western imperialism in that
entire country.
Condemn the UN and the British government Okay.
And British government Okay. And British government Okay.
Fine. And this is after this is after
this is after this election.
You cannot sit there and seriously say you
will not condemn Hamas. You have a draw
say whether or not Well, you can. As
I said, I'm gonna say whether or not
I like Well, you can. I've said that.
You.
The British public are watching you. And if
you will not condemn terror And we just
went over this. They don't support you, bud.
The British population, which you don't speak for,
whether or not you're popular,
clearly does not agree seeing as how 1,700,000
people continue to tune in through that lady's
phone, and the last big special from BBC
got 1.4.
The point is you've already lost control. And
you try to pretend like nobody agrees with
this. Everybody agrees with the reality that Israel
is the one committing crimes. Whether you agree
with the sentiment of death to anything, the
point is the sentiment was about turning the
page, turning this, flipping the script. Israel's the
one who we should be calling out. Whether
or not you agree with what Hamas did
because I can clearly point out a thousand
things you've said a million times about the
reality of how they funded them, about they
let this happen to plenty of degrees, you
know, the the foreknowledge rather and how they
could have let it happen, but also the
reality that Hamas has probably shifted since then
and the reality that they, regardless of whether
Israel made it happen, have the legal right
to arm resistance and what they did, you
know, on and on and on and on.
These things they hate facts like this, or
I'd even argue more so they don't understand
things like this.
Just look at them. Look at their faces,
the way they respond. Like, but but but
you can't sit there and you can't sit.
Yeah. Yeah. Of course, I can. I just
did. And your your only response is, but
you can't. You condemn them us. I mean,
it's just funny. I mean, it was ridiculous
the first month
that you think of how far away this
is.
And if I tell you what, the British
public are watching you. The British public are
watching you. And if you will not condemn
terrorists,
people who have caused absolute chaos upon the
Palestinian people, the ones that started this conflict.
Wow. Can you see the disdain the British
public, the people of Palestine,
is Jewish people will have for you? I'm
happy to condemn terrorists. Let's start with Oh,
you're dead how much? Let's start with Keir
Starmer. Let's start with David Ami. Let's start
with
Let's start with David Lamy.
Start with the people that started this war.
And let's start with I get Let's talk
about it. Who started the war in October?
You, it began in '19 Do you realize
he just said you started the war? I
mean, it's just so clumsy.
These people are clowns.
And I'm I'm willing to bet you that
this is coming through his ear. Right? These
people like a Don Lemon don't even know
what they're talking about. They're just regurgitating what
they're being told to say. I mean, guys,
you started the war? Is that supposed to
be objective journalism?
It's this is straight up propaganda. It always
has. Start with hate, mommy. No. Start with
the people who started this war. And let's
talk about it. Who started the war on
October 10? I'll tell you, it began in
1948
with the forced
You are you are so correct.
Sorry. One more thing to stop, and I'll
let Platt. You hear what you just said?
No. No. No. It didn't. And then he
goes, woah. We can get into a historical
debate, but it's just not relevant.
It's just like, are you kidding me? It's
not relevant whether or not there and it
is and the point is that anybody with
a brain can look back and clearly acknowledge
that there's much history that happened before October
7, but the argument that it just started
October 7, I mean, it's it's inherently dishonest
or inherently stupid.
British, the British, it began in 1948
with the forced No. No. No. It did
not. Would actually go further back. And they
could get it to a historical stuff.
You
are you are so correct. It's absolutely British
the British were entirely involved in setting up
the Zionist state. They were entirely involved in
that. So British imperialism historically is responsible for
those crimes. And today, it is still responsible
for those crimes. And what makes you so
angry actually? There you go. The fact that
more people
support people like Bob Dylan, more people Uh-huh.
In Britain actually wanna see an end to
the occupation. They don't support Britain sending arms
to his gun. Want to be an end
stop. Enrages you. They don't support Bob Dylan.
Violent anti
Semitic. I don't want you to sit here
and call the British public racist and anti
Semitic because they do not She didn't say
that. Support Bob. You just said that. People
support what Bob Dylan said. You just said
that. And Yeah. Because saying death IDF is
not about Jews, you moron. They don't what
overwhelmingly
I think I'm I'm upset that there's a
man who's been given a platform to spout
out So you're not upset about a 100,000
Palestinian Who said that? You're not upset about
the matter of the idea Fiona killed children.
Children to die. Right. Don't shout at me.
Fiona.
Don't shout at me, please. Like, it's just
so beautiful right there to watch. They're they're
drowning.
You know? And one, because she's quiet and
she's deliberate and she won't stop because they
just try to talk over her, but she
clearly continues to talk. And the and the
fact that they just can't stand that she
won't cow to
their cultivated talking points. I love it. Good
for her. She utterly destroyed them.
Here's another clip. This one
says the IDF are sniping children in the
head. British journalist, Israel is one of our
allies. This is what we're getting. Like, it's
become so cartoonish, and even people that are
in their, you know, newsrooms are now starting
to say these things, but we've always seen
at some degree. Again, opportunities we're not. It's
what we should be saying. Yes. That's correct.
Start by saying,
I do not endorse
what Bob Dylan said. I think the chant
has just helped nobody. It was it was
just a really stupid thing to do.
I understand why. There's a lot of anger.
But let's just talk about Lisa Nandy here
and Keir Starmer and just this incredible selective
outrage, which I find impossible to stomach. Right?
She finds it in her heart to to
rush to parliament, to stand up, to question,
and demand answers from a BBC allowing this
this streaming of this band making this chant.
She doesn't rush to parliament to demand answers
and concrete action on the actions that we
are seeing live streamed to us daily
of the IDF who are committing alleged war
crimes at the direction of their prime minister
Netanyahu who has an arrest warrant out for,
again, war crimes. Is that and then, Shianta,
do hang on. Just let let's just get
a I hear you, and I it I
understand what you That's someone jumping in his
ear. Shut it down. Shut it down. Shut
it down.
Again, war crimes. Is that and then, Shianta,
do hang on. Just let let's just get
a I hear you, and I it I
understand what you're saying completely.
And then, Sianta, what's your response to that?
How can you be how can someone be
outraged to get about villain
and not outraged about people being shot up
in food queues?
It it maybe not. I just thought that
was funny because that's what you tend to
hear, you know, when they're, like, trying to
jump in, and it's like, wait. Wait. Wait.
Wait. Wait. That's what you know, it's usually
kind of, like, you get the sense or
something. But he seems to care about the
cues at the very least, but here's what
she says. This is what's important. It is
a very different thing to call for the
deaths
of our allies'
armed forces.
That is going against our country.
And it's calling for people Okay. To be
killed. IDF
are snipering children.
Israel. Whether you like it or not, or
you like it or not, or you like
it. Israel are one of our allies. So
if they're snip so so because they are
rallying Hang on, Marie. Just just one sec.
Just one let let Anenciana say her thing.
There are still hostages being held from a
festival not dissimilar to Glastonbury standing for peace
where the people attending
were attacked. It wasn't a peace rally, guys.
It was a rave, and it's so lazy
that these people just keep repeating these same
lies. Also, a concert that was moved to
be right in the path of what was
gonna happen, and they were also later used
as human shields by the IDF that is
literally on video. But who cares? Right? Kill,
rape,
and take and hostage.
Marina. Let Marina talk. I'm sorry.
Children
are paying the price. And are we saying
that because they are allies, we have to
stand by as they sniper kids in their
head?
And Hamas are using the humans in
Gaza as human shields. They are using the
people understand. I don't know what you're saying.
I don't know what you're saying. The the
late hang on. Let me show you the
latest on this. Hang on. Let me show
you the latest on this. Hang on a
second. I know I know how strongly you
both feel about this. I'll just show you
just just some information here, which is a
Israeli newspaper actually called Haaretz. There you go.
This is an important love this? Don't you
love how irritating this but for that woman,
she's probably like, you know, you could feel
her boiled blood boiling because clear even the
way she responded felt like that was, you
know, the thing she was supposed to say.
And this is perfect. Remember, this is what
we just showed you. This is Harrettes for
the podcast.
An article from the weekend where they say
that IDF soldiers were ordered to shoot at
Gazans who were waiting for food. So that
was a development.
And, Anunciano, the question is this.
How can we be angry at villain and
not even more angry about that?
How can we,
not support
our allies? No. It's not. That is what
the country has set as our mission, that
they are our our allies, that we are
on their side, that this is a war
where there is one side on the right,
one side on the wrong. Hamas have done
the wrong very consistently. Wow. However, everyone wants
there to be a solution.
We're not gonna
I mean, that's just I mean, how that's
strike. That's that's incredible.
I just absolute I mean, if you think
that this woman doesn't know I guess, I
get the sense that she's well aware that
that's insane and that she's just supposed to
say it. That is my personal feeling. Like,
the way your facial face looks is my
personal gut feeling. But
you're so point blank with a a Israeli
article that says they were ordered to kill
innocent people, and your thing is we have
to support our allies?
My god. Yes. This is not the nineteen
nineties. Okay? This is not about the Iraq
war. This is not gonna work anymore. This
is not going to fly. People are not
going to allow you to do whatever the
hell you want as people, I'm saying. The
government seem to not matter. The international community
apparently seems to be inept, at least so
far. But individuals in the world,
we see it, guys, and that's what's changing
this right now. Don't stop.
It's important to make this as uncomfortable and
as obvious as possible
at the very least so we can hold
them accountable when that comes to pass. I'd
love to be able to think we can
stop this, but look at how far it's
been going on.
Just think about how, you know, the resilient
Palestinian people and how they are still
still pushing back, still determined to stay in
their own territory,
deserves praise.
Now these points I wanna point out as
well as they're talking about Zionism
and Israel and the different conflation of all
these, Khaleesi points out. And and this this
is something we've been talking about for a
very long time. The important point, this is
one of this is like the foundational point
of
of this this larger conversation.
Zionism
is not Judaism,
period. Despite all the claims and all the
narratives, it's a political organization
that is not even it's hundreds of years
old whereas Judaism is a, what, thousands.
It's not the same thing. It is a
group that put together the bastardization of this
of this religion. And that's why Herzl, the
founder, was an atheist. That's why he wrote
things in his books that you can look
up right now that are horrible about Jews.
You can realize that they wanted to sacrifice
the Jews in Europe. That was in a
UN document. It's everywhere. They align themselves with
Nazi Germany in order to get the place
they wanted.
And then you're gonna use what happened there
as the justification for why you have to
exist? Guys, this is insane.
And it's been the same argument and the
same manipulations back to the very beginning, and
now it's just not working anymore. Now this
point is to show you and this is
the group see this guy here as well.
They're part of a group called,
Torah Judaism. I think or no. It was,
I forget. They they they recently changed their
name too, but they're a large following on
Twitter, and they exist in there's multiple groups
of them too, but they exist in in
regard to the ones doing this with their
accounts. Existing Israel. They exist in New York
and London. They're all over the world. They're
they're And here are Orthodox Jews. You know,
not just, you know, a casual Jewish person.
They're they're Orthodox Jews that adhere to the
extreme you know, they and they are the
ones going, Zionism is a lie. It does
not represent us. And even if you disagree
with them, just that alone, you can't continue
to pretend that it's if you know, that
you're not Jewish if you don't believe in
Zionism. It's just insane. Now this point shows
you Orthodox Jews
standing up and condemning what they're doing in
Israel and watching average people, you know, like
not Orthodox Jewish people, Israelis
stand up and scream horrible things at them
and say, you're not Jewish.
So the same old point. Clearly, that shows
you it's about Zionism
and not Judaism.
Not
think scum.
Signs they say is
Israel does not represent us.
Palestine.
Palestine. And you have no right to Palestine.
Yeah. I mean, look. I'm not gonna be
the arbiter who's more Jewish. That's a silly
thing to do because just because you're not
dressed like that does not you know, who
knows? Maybe in your private life, you're more
adherent than anybody that this is being objective.
My point though is that at a general
sense, the the peep the Orthodox Jewish community
is, you know, like any situation like that,
Orthodox Christian, you can they're they're far more
adherent to the doctrine
in a general sense. Right? And so the
average person that lives in Israel that's not
really you know, that that is Jewish because
they claim they are by default of being
in in Israel, you which not the same
thing. It's not a nationality, not because or
it's not it's it's a religion, not a
nationality. Despite what Trump said in his last
administration, despite whatever else they've tried to convince
you of, and that's what they're trying to
tell you. And that they call them Nazis
and racist, and
I just it's not hard to see what
this shows you.
Now, one other clip I wanna show you
that overlaps with this exact point.
Now this,
as James Lee points out,
a Zionist
who's running content moderation
for Meta, Facebook,
enacting policy,
outlining criticism of Zionism,
outlawing,
refute removing criticism of Zionism while claiming that
it's anti Semitic to say that Zionist control
the media.
Addition to my work leading the Israel public
policy team, I created a new role specifically
focused on the Jewish diaspora.
It is a privilege to represent META to
Jewish communities worldwide.
I am proud that META's commitment to addressing
antisemitism on our platforms has remained steadfast,
especially after October 7.
Our policies are industry leading in protecting Jewish
people and Israelis on our platforms.
Our community standards include policies that prevent harassment,
violence, and incitement,
and include a robust framework to combat antisemitism.
Our hateful conduct policy includes specific protections
for Israelis and Jews.
We banned holocaust denial and distortion back in
2020.
We changed industry thinking on this issue. That
Look. Even things like this that are considered
wildly contentious are still free speech points, guys.
There's no difference. It's a it's a principle
point. If you can say you're not allowed
to say that, that's no different than saying
you're not allowed to say I support America
or whatever it is. It's just it's it's
words. It's ideas. And they have step by
step created the argument of why they can
shut these things down.
Designating denial as hate speech rather than misinformation.
It wasn't just about facts. It was about
protecting people from harmful conduct.
Stereotypes about Jews, such as the claim that
Jews run the world or other major institutions.
We updated our policies to recognize that the
term Zionist can be used as a proxy
for Jews and Israelis.
We banned content claiming Zionists run the world
or control the media,
and we do not allow for dehumanizing
comparisons of Zionists.
See? Now that's the point Lee was making.
The rest of it, you know, the arguments
about Judaism and so on, like, that's
I which are also largely misrepresented. I mean,
you could look up the facts for yourself.
ADL misrepresenting pro Palestinians as antisemitism.
But the main point is saying, Zionists control
the media, which is not the same as
saying Jews control the media. You understand? That's
the point. They're trying to conflate everything. And
the reality is she's literally in this moment
controlling what you're allowed to say on this
media platform. It's it's just insane.
It is silly. Now I'm never of the
I'm not arguing that Zionists control everything in
the media. I do I think it easily
point out how shockingly influential they are to
maybe the point that they control everything. But
my point is I would require absolute evidence
to say that everything.
Right? I mean, there's plenty of things that
I argue that aren't necessarily seemingly swayed in
the ways they might be in other platforms,
so being objective. But if you can't see
by now that Zionism,
the political organization through Israel that's infiltrated the
US government, the UK government, all around the
world is not in explicit ways
controlling what you can say and what the
media shows you that you're just not paying
attention. And that's why people are trying to
call this out, and that's why they're trying
to conflate it with religion so you can
be called a racist so they can shut
it down. It's simple as it gets, guys.
And people will continue to call me racist
for simply saying that despite
the evidence. Right? My own track record, what
I do in the world, what I say
in general, what, you know, what I actually
believe,
they'll go, no. No. He wink wink actually
means this. No. I don't. But if that
makes you sleep better, if that makes your
lives work for you, the problem is that
everybody's coming around to this, guys. Not not
the not the problem, but the good thing
is that people are finally starting it's a
problem for them, I should say, is that
people are seeing it. Now, if we're getting
long on the show in general, so I'm
gonna go back to this. I I imagine
this is gonna continue for at least a
little bit, but we're gonna come back to
the point of the ceasefire. But I'll just
quickly point out overview
that it's it's it's the same old stupid
thing. And this is what everyone's coming out
and, you know, the one good the one
positive Elon Musk said yesterday, credit where credit
is due showing you and this would actually,
you know what? I I I knew I
forgot. This is what I should have put
on the other part. This when I said
in the beginning, there was the one thing
today that I was like that I saw
today, it was from yesterday, that I said,
okay. That puts it over the edge. It
was this.
Because with everything going on, threatening, he's on
the Epstein files, threatening to deport you and
all this stuff, and you come up and
go credit where credit is due, and then
lie
saying that Trump successfully resolved several conflicts,
he did not. I I mean, it's it's
it's inherits the e it's people are laughing
about this. I mean, I'll show you some.
The point though is that that, to me,
how that gives me the very strong feeling
that there's something else going on, that this
is about fake division. Just my opinion, but
facts matter. We should wait for what we
can prove.
But credit where it's due where he goes,
my representative had a long reductive meeting with
Israel today about the Gaza ceasefire, which at
this point, as we already talked about, was
not even remotely what was happening. We can
read about it here where Trump claims this
is ready ready for peace fire peace fire
ceasefire deal. And if you read about it,
the point is that Hamas
had only just gotten this information. And just
before that, people are literally like this moron
who's an absolute Zionist propagandist is breaking. Hamas
turned down the deal, which that's not what
was happening on 6AM today. The reality was
Hamas hadn't even gotten the information. Then once
they did, as even Fox News will report,
Hamas, serious about a ceasefire, simply insist on
the same old, long standing demands that have
always been there, and they know that. And
so they put forward something they know will
not work, and then they go, Hamas didn't
want peace.
It's just it's just tired, guys. It's stale.
It's the same thing every time because I
think they know that we see it and
they don't seem to care. If even Fox
News has schizophrenia like that, it it just
it's crazy. I mean, because the bottom line
is you look at the information, it's the
same thing. They're not going to allow the
end of or they're not gonna remove themselves
without the end of the of the ongoing
occupation.
And the whole point is
Israel will maintain the occupation. No. Then that's
not gonna the whole thing has been about
that. And they know that, and they're they're
manipulating you. And then you get idiots like
this that come out and go credit where
it's due. He didn't and or rather Trump
himself going, peace, and they better do it
now or it only get worse.
Only get worse? You mean losing 80% of
their territory and half their population and being
starved to death and children dying in front
of you? Yeah. But he'll make it worse,
though, if you don't take the fake deal
that doesn't stop the war.
How does anybody fall for these people? I
really it just blows my mind. Or, you
know, Pierce Morgan, like I said, huge.
Free work, Trump.
Mister Fairweather.
And then
this person simply going, accept the facts, except
none of that's true, and it didn't even
remotely happen. Or Sal Diagoras saying he funded
the conflict
rather than forced us to or rather forced
us to fund it. In fact, we did
we didn't we just send him $500,000,000,000?
The point is guy or was it it
was a yeah. It was it was a
million or a billion. Anyway, we just sent
them lots of more lot more arms on
tops of billions more. And the point was,
you can't claim you stopped something that you're
involved in continuing. Just like with Iran, you
can't claim you created the ceasefire and you're
the peace president when you literally were part
of starting it. It's just lazy, but people
will go like the Gunthers and the Cheekak
Durds and John they're all they just will
say whatever allows them to feel like they
won.
Caitlin Johnstone, just to everyone saying the same
thing, he did it. He didn't do anything.
He didn't do anything, you effing morons. Hamas
hasn't agreed to anything, and she said this
this morning because it was true. And now
my point is since then, they have taken
time to look at it and they simply
said, no. It's the same old manipulation.
We're not going to go for something that
allows you to continue the war.
And she simply says, that's why he's only
talking about Israel, you imbeciles, you foam brained
human livestock. Now, I mean, I I think
that's true in some cases. I think it's
more so just about them saying whatever he
said that day is the thing. Like, I
keep point pointing out. Jeremy Scaio,
this was, yeah, earlier today, simply said Hamas
confirms it this is after the point I'm
making. So they first, they didn't even have
it, and people like this were already saying
it was over. Then they got it, and
now it says, Hamas confirms it has received
the new draft of the Gaza, quote, ceasefire.
In a statement, Hamas said its aim is
for a deal that guarantees an end of
the aggression, archives,
achieves
withdraw, and urgently provides relief to our people
in Gaza. Important to note that this draft,
which Trump claims Israel agreed to, which was
the product of a US Israeli plan and
officially relayed by Qatar. While Hebrew media claims
the language on extending the ceasefire beyond sixty
days is stronger,
we have heard this story before. And then
Hamas responds to it and simply goes,
it's it's it's fraud. Right? It's not what
we're claiming. It's not what we want. And
then they turn around and go, they've denied
it, like they've done 75 times already. Lastly,
Israel's continuing to flesh out its bases in
Syria even though nobody wants to talk about
that. Locals fear demolitions as Israeli troops set
up new bases in Syria. That's not the
first one, you understand? So this is Syria's
territory now. That's the reality despite American troops
dying for freedom, we were told. Right? And
that's antiwar.com.
And Dave just asked, is there a source
that proves this the new Syrian president is
linked to terrorism? Because he want he was,
I think, he was debating somebody. And I
this is it's just crazy that most people
don't even know this. The US government had
a $10,000,000
bounty on his head even after they made
him president. You realize how stupid that is?
This is that's that's right there. That's the
guy. Whatever they I think I forgot his
new name now. Jelani was the first one
that's like it's,
Asana. I forget his name now. The point
is they just gave a new name, put
him in a suit, and then say, okay.
No more sanctions.
So the US government is supporting terrorism. That's
not new, but maybe it's new for people
today.
David Icke, make terrorists great again so long
as Israel agrees.
Trump says the man that is leading Syria,
that guy, was the head of some tough
organizations. He's pretty tough. He's a good guy.
And as Megatron points out, those were ISIS
and Al Qaeda.
It's that's a public open debate, an open
secret. You could look for yourself. And Trump's
going, he's a good guy?
Again, just like with Elon or anything else,
either they were never fighting those things or
they're now showing you that it never really
mattered. It was only about the means to
an end to control you or to overthrow
countries.
You take your pick.
Time to wake up, America. It's very clear
what's happening.
Syrian girl says Trump supports Al Qaeda, but
we're supposed to freak out about a Muslim
mayor in New York?
Yeah. That's pretty crazy, isn't it?
The cradle. Syrian warlords behind torture, kidnapping, and
ethnic minorities benefit from US sanctions relief.
My god, guys. How do we let this
happen because of a bunch of morons screaming
at the top of Twitter?
This is not what we believe in. I
mean, at least what I can see, and
I'm talking about people that are conservative and
liberal that are talking about this stuff, that
have opinions, not just whatever the people in
power said that day.
Stand up.
Lastly, The US sends,
won't send weapons to Ukraine.
So, of course, some people said, see, peace
president, except the reality is The US is
halting shipments of weapons to Ukraine amid concerns
that its own stockpiles have declined. Oh, okay.
So who cares about peace or that we
wanna support you? So either one. It's not
about peace. It's not about upholding our agreements.
We need things, so f off.
Typical US government. I don't want them to
support Ukraine. I don't wanna support any of
these things. The point is I'm willing to
bet you anything well, actually, I can prove
Israel is still supporting them. And the reality
is that I bet you US is still
doing it through other channels, in other ways,
through other countries' means and other other material.
But the point is publicly saying, we're stopping
because we need them.
So didn't you sign an agreement? Who cares
about that? Also, it's not about peace because
they don't care about stopping the war. They
just want it for their continued wars in
other places.
It's never been more clear in my opinion.
Like, never in my entire life doing this,
how long I've been doing this, has it
ever been this clear.
I think that's exactly why we're where we
are, exactly why we're seeing
shockingly dramatic and rapid changes to the way
we understand this country operates.
Do something about it. I'm never calling for
violence, but it is time, as always, has
been for a long time, to get out
of your chair,
find something to care about. Go out there
and protest. If you think it matters, go
talk to your politicians. If you think it
has an effect, start your own show if
you wanna help people inform, but just get
the information moving, guys. Talk to people. Like
I said, start up little groups, have community
conversations,
go in the park and talk about it,
play. You know, it just doesn't matter. Just
get this stuff moving because I think that
there is a very small, like,
a tiny, tiny gap between where we are
now and where we see something change, where
a watershed moment, like enough people. And, you
know, whatever that number is, we are right
there. And really, even if that's not the
case, and I believe it,
there's no reason we shouldn't push harder anyway.
I mean, in fact, there is every reason
why we should push harder today.
Thank you for continuing to support this platform.
Every single this what we do, the longformcom
the the days of work and research that
we it's all free. We do it because
we believe in it. We believe in you,
and we want this information to be there
for you to to understand, to use as
a resource, to educate yourself, to be able
to articulate these things, not repeat headlines, but
articulate the argument.
Be able to have an educated conversation with
somebody about things, not just say what Trump
said yesterday. Right? Or Biden pointed out.
Educate yourself. Be better than that. Right?
Get this information out there because it is
making a difference. You are making a difference.
And support this platform through that because we
do it every day because it matters because
we care about the information.
Thank you all for being here. I love
you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.