You know, the biggest change I've seen in
Congress is Israel
literally owned Congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
Pride of being able to be here and
do work that facilitates,
making things better for people,
and in the greatest country on earth,
next to Israel.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap
up.
Monday, 06/23/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Largely a
follow-up from yesterday's show, so make sure you
tune in to what we were discussing yesterday.
Some important developments around the Abrego Garcia case,
which I've argued most are not gonna see
because of how much is going on. It's
an important development that shows you some major
it's it's the it's what we've been telling
you the entire time. I mean, really based
the the court is seeing the same things
we've been highlighting whether, you know, you can
decide the validity
of what we're pointing to. I think the
evidence speaks for itself. But showing you the
dishonesty of this administration, just in my opinion,
the US government, no different from the one
before, but they're in the position to egregiously
lie to you about something that was so
foundational to this country, whether that was a
green card holder, Visa card holder, or an
illegal immigrant. If we've hopefully come to understand
by now that they all, yes, have constitutional
rights, and that's how this was designed. The
the
one of the main issues was them trying
to change understanding of that and drive us
to a point to where we then pretended
governments gave us rights as opposed to understanding
the inherent god given dynamic that our constitutional
rights as outlined by the framing of, you
know, the founders of this country.
The development of this case is important because
they've ruled
very publicly against not just whether or not
he should be detained, but the body of
evidence that is exactly what we've been telling
you. Hearsay, redundant, and it does not claim
what they make it. They they're claiming it
does. Very important to
see. Now we're gonna start with some other
points as well that I think are relevant.
Largely gonna be following up on the developments
beyond yesterday in regard to Iran attacking Qatar
or rather, you know, largely what we expected
to happen based on all the evidence aside
from a lot of the kind of fear
mongering coverage out there that it seemed there
was already evidence that showed that they were
coordinating behind the scenes, which has happened almost
every time before this. And now it and
I I'm thinking more of an rack base,
but it seem seems like they actually get
go after rack as well. But then it
also now seems that there's arguments being made
that this was allowed,
which is really
interesting when you're watching headsets and the rest
come out and go, they were so weak
and we're so strong, which is exactly what
I told you what happened yesterday. It's not
it's not like we're psychic. Anybody with a
brain could have seen that coming if you
just watch how this tends to go, which
is that they
take advantage of that every time. And in
the background idea, remember, Trump pulled troops away
from Iraq. It seems that the the basin
cutter was largely removed as well. There was
nobody really there. No but no casualties.
You know? So it seems like this was
meant to happen this way maybe. You know?
And the question is whether or not there's,
like, a double cross between Israel and Iran,
and we'll get to in all we'll get
to all of that. But
the argument for especially for the the Jones
of the world that are always kind of
hyping the World War three on the cusp
of tomorrow,
it clearly seems to have somewhat deescalated at
least in the moment, but I don't think
that's where it's gonna go. I think Israel
is determined to make this continue,
and that's comes back to this country and
whether we truly see the Israel first direction
of this government right now or we do
something different. But we're gonna go through all
the information today, so make sure you stay
tuned. Lots to cover.
But I wanna say out of the gate
before we get into all the rest of
it, like, around what's happening with Israel and
Iran,
that they're it's very easy to fall into
the the, you know, fast paced. We're about
to fall into something. Like, the, know, the
kind of the breathless coverage you're getting a
lot from I mean, it's always corporate media.
That's what they do. But the mainstream alternative
media has become just, you know,
more so cartoonish than what they were before
after these last few events. And I think
a lot of people are beginning to see
that. And it's very easy to fall into
the
which is certainly possible, the worst case scenario
reporting. Right? Obviously, it's a scenario that is
possible, so it's not something we should ignore.
But it's very easy to fall into that
kind of we're, you know, building it's it's
like you're watching a reality TV show. And
I think a lot of people, without even
realizing it, begin to almost enjoy the excitement
of all that's going on, and they're really
tapping into that. So it's very important to
especially if you're out here seeking the truth,
and that's really what you're doing here on
this show or anywhere else, is to be
careful about who you're listening to. And I
would say listen to everybody if you have
the time, but just be careful and make
sure you're doing your due diligence. Look for
the source material. If someone's out there giving
reports and not giving you any source material,
you should not be giving them your time.
I mean, if it's data points you can
consider, like I said, you should if you've
got the time,
sit there and listen to everybody and consider
the points. But the people who are not
giving you source material
are people that are you know, there there's
nothing you can then double check. So you're
left basically taking them at face value. So
why would you then listen to that in
the first place? Go find somebody out there
who's making similar claims and look for the
actual source material. And if there is none,
well, then it's a case that basically ends
up being a simple data point where you
don't know any further. The problem is in
this field today,
the narratives run the story. And that's kinda
how this goes. For a long time, Twitter
was a huge part of that. On a
on another side note, by the way, isn't
it interesting how the whole Twitter, Doge, Elon,
all that just kinda got shoved out of
the way? Now, yes, this is a major
war conversation,
but there's a lot of really big things
hanging in the air that clearly did not
happen
that we're all just pretending weren't obvious.
I think that's very interesting. We we will
come back to all of those as soon
you know, when the time is right. But
let's let's go in. Oh, first, I wanted
to shout out an interview we just had
with Brian. I told you it was gonna
be coming out.
Really, really enjoyed this conversation. I'm gonna try
to have him on more often.
And this is Brian Young from, his channel
was High Impact Flix. That's how people still
know him as the name that's on his
Twitter account. They aren't, like, you know but
those that follow him regularly watch his shows.
He's got two new channels we discussed in
the show. But it was just a great
conversation, and it was entitled exposing team sport
politics and the illusion of government. He's he's
very knowledgeable on this, and I think he's
worth your time. So make sure to give
him some support.
Now let's start with the with some things
about Gaza because I think it's paramount that
we don't lose sight of how that is
not just like I've said almost every day
for the last so many shows we've done.
It's not it's not only it's not even
just stagnant. It's it's it's it's not slowing
down. It's not staying the same. It's getting
rapidly worse every day in in Gaza and
getting less coverage than ever.
How that's even possible with what we know
about this is beyond me. But as WikiLeaks
reports, this is today. Israel rolls out Gaza
hunger games. Not the first time that analogy
has been used in this con in in,
you know, just the last year plus.
Four hundred,
four zero zero killed, over three thousand wounded
in Gaza aid programs.
So you have to understand, we're talking about
the people that they told you. Remember the
first day when they shot people in food
lines?
And it was all these swirling arguments about,
no. It was Hamas. No. It was a
lie. No. That's not even possible. And then
it eventually cascaded over, like, four different sessions
of, no. Okay. Well, it was. But they
were we were shooting above them. And, oh,
no. We did shoot at them, but they
were rushing us. And every single and I
mean, literally every time this happens.
Four hundred killed because they kept shooting them
every day. And only that first day did
they even pretend to care about pushing back
on the narrative. Because after that, people were
looking elsewhere, and they were just executing people
in real time, shooting children from rooftops in
public, in broad daylight, in front of people
filming. Nobody cares.
I mean, I it's it's important to recognize
why this angers me so much that we
that you know? Look. And I I I
know it frustrates some of you, and I
get it. You know I'm not talking about
you guys here listening. When I say that,
I'm talking about the general the people who
have the ability to actually change this, who
we can stop funding them, who could stand
up and make a major statement that would
influence average people,
but it continues.
Starving civilians gather in massive crowds waiting for
permission to approach. In many instances, Israeli troops
have literally opened fire on people standing there
waiting, and it's very public.
And even during the distribution of food, killing
dozens as they try to collect a few
kilos of flour or canned goods to bring
them home in what Palestinians have dubbed the
hunger games.
Very real.
Muhammad Shehada points out that exactly seven months
before October 7, Israel's ex defense minister, Moshe
Yilan, who actually I you know what? I'll
play that really quickly if I grab if
I was gonna start with that, but I
thought the other one was better to start
with. We'll come right back to that, by
the way. The Tammy Bruce statement of, you
know, best country in the world before Israel
or, you know, after Israel,
very clearly trying to make that sidestep. And
then when it becomes public, trying to say,
oh, it's out of context, but we have
the full picture. We'll have the full clip
for you. We'll play that in a second.
Very much not out of context. Just afraid
when people find out the reality or rather,
it's they're not used to when people call
it out.
It's like this weird anomaly where they can
be, you know, just
very public about the thing we're not supposed
to see, but yet no everyone's so afraid
to be called racist by the Israeli Zionist
regime that they but that's not happening anymore.
We'll come back to that. My point is
I'm gonna read this. I'm gonna play a
clip that you've probably seen before that mentions
Moshe Yolan, and there's different many different characters
going back, not that long, honestly, but going
back to the beginning. But the clip, only
just over the last so many administrations that
they have been screening all the things we've
been telling you, and it's not new to
October 7. But exactly seven months, and this
is as of yet as of today, seven
months before October 7, Israel's ex defense minister,
Moshe Yolan,
warned that Netanyahu's government will keep provoking Palestinians
in every way possible to get them to
respond,
then use that response as pretext for the
final war. That's the biblical end times conversation.
Netanyahu's government is now confirming this.
Key Netanyahu ally says Hamas massacre, quote, save
the people of Israel without October 7 Netanyahu
and Trump. There would be no strike on
Iran.
Really take a second to reflect on that
little circle of information.
The simple insinuation from Israeli
leadership
that the entire thing, whether it was allowed
or not, which is obviously something you know
we should ask. We've talked about the foreknowledge,
the hours of time where nobody did anything,
the amount they did, on and on and
on, Hannibal directive. But the idea that they
could even insinuate with that opening bright part
right there that this was good for them.
You know, sort of like how nine eleven,
as they've said, was good for Israel. Look
it up. It's very common. You might be
blown away if you don't realize. It's the
same thing I was just saying a second
ago. It's all out there. Just look. There
people have been afraid to call it out.
But they said that because, well, because it's
caused it made it made the West start
caring about Muslim terrorism, you know, whatever the
narrative is. Nonetheless, the point is good for
us. Same thing here. Saying that ultimately, this
was all good because it that we wouldn't
be able to attack Iran.
My god.
And the scary thing is guys that I
know most people see it. I know most
Republicans see this right now. And right now
we're conservatives more more specifically,
and who are very, very confounded about turning
around to look at the team they think
they're on. They're going, you're not America first.
They're going, wait a minute. We're talking about
we're talking about this country and you're and
Israel's and you're the one that said, I'm
not America first. It's just it's just this
funny back and forth, which is kinda terrifying
when you realize how serious it is. But
it's a very positive moment aside from how
uncomfortable it is because it shows you people
are waking up, not in one partisan side
or the other, but in general.
We've been calling it out for a long
time.
This is a clip that it's,
oh, here.
I forgot to download this.
This is a person
speaking to members of the Israeli military
who's telling them,
you know, if you wanna do all the
things that we see you doing, just don't
do it publicly. Right? Go out there and
have a good time, but, you know, don't
if you wanna dress in women's clothing and,
you know, steal things and whatever, just do
it when no one's looking.
That's this is literally what we're talking about.
This is where Israel has unique issues. There's
the one piece of advice I'll give you,
okay, if you're joining the IDF. Okay? Leave
your fucking cell phone at home and stop
taking stupid fucking videos. Okay? Because everybody Sorry.
I was cursing. I forgot to mention that
for those listening. I apologize. You it is
family friendly on the show, and I tend
to point it out beforehand. I just frustrated
for those opening clips.
But
the idea so it's not like, hey. Stop
committing war crimes.
Just stop showing everybody what we're doing, and
they all laugh about it.
I mean, look. Wearing a dress is not
a war crime, but it's one step in
that direction of, you know, just
obviously, raiding hue people's homes that are civilians
and stealing their foot clothes and jewelry is
a crime. Maybe not to the level of
war crime, but the point is everything else
they're talking about are are are in, you
know, human rights violations, war crimes, and they're
all being documented. They're dancing about it on
TikTok, and he's simply going, just stop showing
everybody.
And he's fucking you with him. Okay? And
if you see if you see a soldier,
okay, going through a fucking drawer, and he
listen. If you wanna fucking wear a dress
and you think it's funny, just don't fucking
take a fucking video picture of it. Okay?
Jesus.
My god.
Like, this is how removed people are from
this. Like like, the idea is you're so
far on that side that it's it's preservation.
It's not about right and wrong or facts.
It's about stop exposing us.
It's just wild.
And Abir says this Destiny's advice to, and
this what's his name? That's I forget his
full name. We've mentioned it before. But his
advice to Israeli soldiers on the Hazbarah tour.
People don't like seeing our war crimes. Don't
film ourselves in women's clothing. Just put our
camera away and have fun.
Well, here is what the Israeli ambassador to
UK has insisted, and we've seen we've seen
her in her clumsy tour. I don't even
know why they keep using her. She she
is she's the one that tried to pretend
that there were no churches in Gaza until
the guy said, yeah. But there are, though.
Here's a picture. And she goes, oh, what?
I meant none that are still being used.
And he goes, but they are, though. And
here's the pray the pastor. She goes, well,
but Hamas is bad and, like, just tries
to jump away from the story and got
caught in real time trying to pretend, one,
that there were no churches, then got when
she felt was exposed in real time, tried
to evolve the lie to go, but no,
but this, but no. That's a lie too.
Here's a literal pastor who's trying to show
everyone that they're being bombed.
So did she not know that? I mean,
look. Let's not let's not play games. She
was lying deliberately to hide what they're doing.
And then just like Israeli government propaganda always
goes, once they get caught for the lie,
they just broaden the lie a little bit.
Oh, okay. But then add this too. Does
that work for you? No? Okay. Then I'll
raise you five more. How about that?
It's I'm it's not a joke. It's literally
what they do every time.
Sky News, Israeli ambassador to UK,
has insisted children have, quote, never been targeted
in Gaza and said Hamas should be blamed
for every death.
So this is where we're as we're now
being pulled into different conversations and people are
distancing themselves from this they're trying to reimagine
the truth. It's what they do every time.
And this is what Israel is hell bent
on creating, a time gap to where they
can just forcefully
scream racism and make people go back into
place. It's happened before.
I just think it's insane that we can't
be honest about that. Oh, I was gonna
play let me play two clips for you
then.
Since I don't have any time restrictions, probably
gonna be longer. I hope it's not that
long today, but here's the clip I played
before in case you forgot.
This is a Jewish doctor who's admitting to
you that he's and this I I'll I'll
bring up the the the threat as well.
They're not only watching them snipe children. They're
watching them kill doctors. They're watching them assassinate
people. We have the the clip from the
from Nick doctor Nick Maynard about the hospitals,
about I mean, it it never stops. And
this is she's trying to tell you not
only have they not killed a single child,
but that it's all Hamas. When were you
in Gaza?
April
for the first couple weeks, and then there's
sniper bullets. I have children that were shot
twice. Wait. You're saying that children in Gaza
are being shot by snipers? Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, thirty years,
ground zero,
earthquakes,
all of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my first week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children
than I've ever seen in my entire life
combined.
I've seen more shredded children
in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts,
being crushed by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of eight year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being
of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be a, an orphan in
watching your family, you know, melted in front
of you and shredded in front of you?
How do you fix that? Ever fix that?
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure of the hospital has
been destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were a 107
patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last forty eight hours there. You
know, you guys you guys have seen all
of these clips.
It's insane to me that we have to
pull the play like, you have a I
mean, look at look at this thread.
I mean, you do the math. There's four
in almost every one of these, and it
continues. There's two in some of them. Four
plus four plus four plus four plus four
plus two plus one plus four plus all
these together. All of them down these last
and and I've tried to add more, by
the way, in the last few times I've
tried. Twitter wouldn't let me. Different story.
Every single one of these clips are doctors
from multiple countries all around the world. And
in in fact, even though they're just as
valid to include, I haven't included doctors that
are in Palestine or, like, from pal these
are all doctors from London, from New York,
from the all over the world, And they're
literally telling you, I've watched them execute children.
I've watched them kill doctors. Nick Madron was
gonna continue to tell you, I've watched them
execute people I know. There's never seen we've
nobody I've spoken to has ever seen Hamas
in any one of these hospitals.
And here we are, Getting shouted back by
politicians when you have doctors who have no
no I mean, any one of them could
lie for any number of reasons. But having
this many with no real interest in why
would they lie about all of this clearly
are trying to show you what's going on.
Here is a clip that I told you
I was gonna play as well that just
goes back before this. Going back to the
the point about I mentioned Yoshee Malone and
Malone, however you probably pronounce it properly, Malone.
And many other people that have been in
the Israeli government long before October 7 who
have been trying
And this is,
I'm gonna try I'm gonna grab his name.
I'm blank on top of my head. It's
the Irish member of parliament who's telling you,
reading off their own statements of how they
think these people are subhuman. They shouldn't exist.
Now look. You could argue that the other
side feels the same way. I'm just sure
there's plenty of those examples.
But the idea has to understand that the
person in control, the Israeli the Israeli government
that has that controls the circumstances
of all these people's lives does not think
they should exist. That's now even if you
wanna say the exact same thing, which I
think is very different for a lot of
Palestinians,
the the the may even if you wanna
think it's all of them, pretty sure they
don't have control over the lives of Israelis,
and that makes quite the difference, doesn't it?
Here's what you had to say. Defense minister.
He's telling you that's what he start starts
with. He's telling you about this going back
decades.
This is the defense minister, Moshe Yaalon,
talking just a couple of weeks ago. Israel
is going to hurt Lebanese civilians
to include kids of the family.
We went through a very long discussion.
We did it then. We did it in
the Gaza Strip. We are going to do
it in any round of hostilities in the
future. This is 02/2015,
by the way. 02/2015.
As the defense minister,
this is the,
military chief of staff, Benny Gantz.
The next round of violence will be worse
and see this suffering increase.
He headed up the military assaults,
on Gaza the last, two.
This is the minister for education
in the Netanyahu government.
There will never be a peace plan with
the Palestinians.
I will do everything in my power to
make sure they never get a state.
But and then I turn around and talk
to BBC and Fox News and CNN and
tell them a completely different story, and they
blindly repeat that. Even today, in many cases.
Despite the statements, despite the action, despite the
precedent and the outcome, they just go, here's
what Israel said.
Also said,
if you catch terrorists, you simply have to
kill them. I've killed a lot of Arabs
in my life, and there's no problem with
that.
This is the minister for justice.
Palestinians
are all enemy combatants.
This also includes the mother the mothers of
the martyrs.
They should follow their sons. Nothing would be
more just. They should go, as should the
physical homes in which they are which they
raised the snakes.
Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.
That's the Israeli minister for justice
in the last few months.
Israeli minister for deputy minister for defense.
Palestinians
are beasts.
They are not human.
The minister for foreign affairs,
c p Hockley is the last one.
My position
is that between the sea and the Jordan
River, there needs to be one state only,
the state of Israel. There is no place
for any agreement of any kind that discusses
the concession of Israeli sovereignty
over lands conquered in 1967.
Now these are the official statements of several
ministers
of the current government
of Israel.
In one case, actually advocating genocide
of all Palestinians, including children, and calling them
snakes.
Now can I ask you, Taoiseach?
Do you not think
that if we're defining terrorism,
that is the language
and thinking of terrorists?
That it is absolutely
unacceptable
in civilized politics, in civilized international relations,
for the heads of government
of a state that we carry on normal
relations with and who you met in Paris
to advocate those sort of views
when we know they have also led on
to the deaths of thousands of Palestinians,
innocent chill men, women, and children.
What have you to say, Taoiseach,
about those sort of views being expressed by
the Israeli government?
Realizing I was listening and I forgot to
grab his name. I remind me in the
chat. I know some of you remember his
name. I've spoken about it many times in
the past.
I'll I'll point it out if you guys
drop in the chat for me. I still
wanna search right now and try to I'm
not I forget where to start on what
the name is, but Simon Godek adds to
this.
Self defense,
quotes. Precision strike, in quotes. World's most moral
army, in quotes.
An image that should be seared into our
brains. As far
as you can look into the horizon for
the podcast, nothing
but broken
piles of wood
that used to be a civilization.
I just don't that speaks for itself.
There's no that nobody
nobody honest could argue that that is anything
other than absolute destruction of an entire people.
Richard Boyd Barrett, thank you very much.
Check he's
been screening about this for a long time.
But just take a look, guys.
Like, I mean, as far as you can
look, there's some skeletal remains of larger buildings,
but it's everything is gone.
Precision.
Ryan Rosbiani points out, now this I I
still argue that this is an underestimate
for many reasons. But now they're more there's
more evidence that has come out. They're claiming
that they can verify 377,000
missing Palestinians.
Not to say that there we that that
you could argue they're all dead,
but it's hard to imagine where else they
might be missing
other than under rubble or
vaporized by the bombing they're doing or whatever
else. I mean, there's certain possibilities of people
that have left and fled, however that's possible.
But the bottom line is 377,000.
And, I mean, even Israel and Donald Trump
are talking about a million people in regard
to where they well, we're there was over
2,000,000 when this started. Where did that million
people go? Why aren't you can factoring in
where they might need to go? Maybe because
they don't think they're there anymore.
As of June 2025, a dataset
hosted by Harvard
shows Gaza's population has dropped from 2,200,000
to 1.85,
and that is what they can prove right
now.
Understand, it is an underestimate. There's no way
around that with what's been going on. That's
my opinion. But realize just like we saw
with The Lancet that said it was up
almost 200,000
back and everyone pushed back on that, it
was only because and still, that's even a
good shout out to the UN numbers where
they were saying
that what they could prove, even though we
all knew it was more than that, And
they were still maintaining what they could prove,
rather even more than that, specifically, the gods
of health ministry who were making those numbers.
For this, they could be saying a million
people this whole time, but they were sticking
with, what, 50 something thousand because that's all
they could actually prove.
And and meanwhile, they're all being called monsters
and Hamas and racists or whatever else. They're
Nazis and and they're the ones actually being
honest enough to actually hold number back when
they know it's more than that. Insane.
There are people in Northern Gaza who endured
the heaviest bombing, residents of Rafa's Eastern District,
districts, he's pointing out, families and zones in
total communication blackout.
Now on Syria,
all these irrelevant that you understand understand the
idea of what Israel is doing in foreign
policy in Iran in particular and and throughout
The United States.
Syrian girl points out, American Robert Ford,
is and then his Twitter account says he
and British m I six helped rebrand Jelani.
You can listen for yourself. He basically just
listed off how he went to visit him
and and talked about changing his name, and
it's it's it's so blatant what's happening. And
and understand, it's not like it's a secret.
He openly tells you what this guy is
and how they rebranded him and how they
got him into politics. I mean, it the
it's like the it's the quiet part out
loud as a as a document. It's exactly
what we're talking about, and it's not even
hidden. The founder of Al Qaeda in Syria,
Jalani is his his name now.
He said Jalani never apologized for the terrorist
attacks in Syria and Iraq, or rather, I
think Jalani was the name used. Now it's
the other one they claim is the real
one. Either way, it's a terrorist who they
told you was a terrorist, who they secretly
were always working with, who they've now allowed
to take control of Syria, rather they pretend
that while Israel's take control of Syria.
Now, of course, churches are being bombed in
Syria,
which we've just talked about. In fact, that's
one of the worst things that are happening
right now in regard to, you know,
the not that this one thing like, the
just the indiscriminate attacks on average people on
all walks of life because they are not
either aligned with what they're currently doing or
they're ideologically different, that they have the wrong
skin color, any numb or just because they
felt like it that day.
We've already shown you this.
That immediately afterward, there were people literally wearing
ISIS patches who were running around Syria executing
whoever they wanted, and they worked for The
US and Israel. We shouldn't even be balking
at that anymore.
And so the point is that these they're
literally telling you and look. You can zoom
in and see the guy. They they they
gave a face lift.
Vanessa Bielier in the past have laughed about
how they all just gave them a face
lift and called them Hayat al Sham. Now
it's no longer Al Qaeda, and people fall
for it, or rather they just don't care.
So here,
Jelani's asked about Israel and the overlap, knowing
that Israel is the basic handler of all
this. And Syrian journalists asked him, Israel continues
its aggression against Syria, and your attempts to
make peace with them was ignored. So what
do you plan to do about it? His
answer, I don't wanna talk about that.
Of course.
Right? In the beginning, telling you that they
weren't gonna go after Israel, that Israel do
whatever they wanted. And it's not hard to
see what's going on. The moderate rebels being
treated in you know, the Israeli and is
the Israeli government, the US government have been
treating, working with arming, funding, and moving around
these groups for a very long time. It
is the most provable part of the conversation.
Here's Donald Trump next to him. As Dave
DeCamp points out, it's funny that they're going
with with the IEDs in Iraq thing to
justify the war with Iran,
when in Syria, they've embraced an Al Qaeda
guy who directly fought insurgency
against The US and Iraq.
Trump even praised him for his strong past
because that's what he's supposed to say. He's
literally standing next to the guy who very
well could have laid down those bombs that
blew up American peep you know, anybody involved,
Americans, if that matters more to you.
It's just that simple. There's no it's it's
that simple. On top of that, the IED
dynamic realized you're talking about an illegal invasion
of Iraq.
I saw a a military person say that,
say, how how dare you? I was there,
and I'm like, you mean during the illegal
invasion? Like, I'm not trying to be blithe
about it. It
you you were you were fooled. Or, you
know, maybe you believe in the statism and
the and the occupation. But many of them
went thinking they were fighting for freedom. That's
not their fault.
But you were lied to. And even even
if you think they're terrorists because they were
defending their country, I mean, it's just so
silly to think that invading a country and
them fighting back makes them the bad guy.
How they do this everywhere. And I gotta
be honest, that picture of Trump looks odd,
Like, over like like, overly smiling. Like, he's
just I don't I think he's not stupid.
I think he knows what's going on, and
he it seems like he's being used.
But that's alarming.
And Christians to Beirut, Alawites to the grave
was an early sectarian insurgent chant in the
Syrian dirty war.
Christians to Beirut, Alawites to the grave.
Someone has marked Christians for the grave. Now
remember, the Alawites were the ones that were
being executed right when this first started. Now
suicide bombers attack a Christian church in Syria.
So just think about this for a second.
The group that they're supporting,
these churches were not touched when Assad was
in power, and Israel and United States allowed
the terrorists they claimed they were fighting, like,
on the surface of the conversation to take
power, they give him a suit, they change
his name, right in plain daylight. Like, we
can't see like like, they know you can
see it in fact. They almost don't seem
to care.
Then
these people, in their control structure, their start
suicide bombings start happening, and against Christians, the
very group that Israel was targeting the entire
time.
And, of course, this has been my point
for a long time. Notice how you weren't
seeing the suicide bombers from this. This is
Zionism, guys. That's what the suicide vest bombing
dynamic actually roots back to, Zionism.
But here we are with their control structure,
their people there. I mean, whether you wanna
argue it's because they're just not caring and
people are going crazy in the country or
because they're making this happen, it's the same
ultimate point.
They are the ones creating destabilization while claiming
they're saving the world,
bringing freedom and liberty while destroying everything for
their
for their benefit at the expense of everybody.
Ask Syrians.
So just that this relates to Israel and
The United States and what they're doing in
the world. Now even if you wanna make
it a specific point about regime change,
how did that work out for Iran? I
mean, rather well, like that too back in
operation Ajax when it became a despotic hellhole
for everybody other than western elitists. But Syria,
are they thriving with benefit? Okay. What about
Iraq? What about Afghanistan?
What about Libya?
I mean, you can make all these cases,
and you can pretend they tried to do
right by them, but didn't fail, made a
mistake, or they never meant to help them.
But the same argument applies. Why would you
let them even try to do that again
in Iran? I've made that joke for so
many years that, you know, even if you
think they're actually just doing their best and,
like, tripping over the shoelaces and destroying countries,
they're batting zero, guys. Zero.
They haven't saved one of them from there's
no freedom that I can see in these
countries, so maybe we should not let them
do it again. Maybe that's a smart thing
to think about.
But before we go to the further conversation
of foreign policy and how that continues, let's
recognize how that same thing is destroying this
country.
And and some of the side the byproducts
of that have been the attempts to begin
the encroachment on our rights for what is
real and foreign governments want. And this developed
in the case of Garcia and Khalil and
plenty of other people who were here legally
with no criminal record who are still currently
rotting in El Salvador.
But they didn't get focused on because they
were faceless people in a big group that
got sent. Now I I imagine someone's gonna
start picking through those, but Garcia and Khalil
were major cases that started this off that
people could see.
And it's important for you to see where
this has now gotten to.
Now this is just the the one of
the main cover. There's more coverage since this
article, this show, but this is one I
think the best ones from the early ad
data that still stands. In fact, let me
see if I can grab this.
I mean, it's in it's in the show.
There's a link in here somewhere about that,
the tweet that I put in about it.
Oh, you know what? Never mind. I'll take
it back because I included all the court
documents right here. The very first thing, Garcia
court documents, and every one of these documents
prove what is still the most important part
of this, which the judge points to, which
is that they're lying about the gang relations
and where that data comes from, and it's
all she calls it double hearsay.
That's the best they have, guys, and that's
why this human trafficking thing is they're they
are just patching this together as they go.
And And if you haven't seen our coverage,
look, before you start calling me a minute,
the liar, and I don't know what I'm
talking about. Yeah. I do. And I've gone
through this in-depth and have proven well before
they were making these next claims that they've
been lying about this from day one. And
I've the the actual traffic stop we went
through in-depth before they even used it to
claim this today. It's just it's incredible. And
I'm not gonna go through it all again
today. More things to talk talk about. But
I'll include this show,
and let's read this first, and I'll talk
about the Khalil one next. Now Steven Miller
this is from the Daily Beast. Stephen Miller
embarrassed in high profile court ruling.
It says a judge has shut down arguments
pushed by the Trump administration and White House
deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, very, very,
very, very passionate Zionist, in a ruling surrounding
the high profile case of Kilmer or Brega
Garcia.
Tennessee magistrate Barbara Holmes ruled Sunday that if
Brega Garcia
is not
the dangerous gang member, Trump allies like Miller
and Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, have
repeatedly claimed he is. Now, of course, that
just like every time, no matter what, it's
a judge and judicial coup and yeah. Maybe.
Consider that. But maybe also look at the
evidence and consider for yourself that they're blatantly
lying about it and happened from day one.
Abrego Garcia is pending trial
on human smuggling
charges for allegedly transporting undocumented migrants within The
US. He's plead not guilty to the charges.
Now realize, again, this was one time where
he was caught in his in his and
it really was his employer's car, you can
prove that, where he had a bunch of
people
that didn't speak English. I mean, very well
could have been bringing illegal immigrants to go
work with his boss. That's what they did.
Construction and stuff. Another I think it was
construction. Right? Something in that vein.
So if you wanna think if that's a
if you wanna make an issue about that,
then fine. Charge him for I mean, the
bottom line is not not to get ahead
of that, but was that they looked at
it. They said that seems suspicious,
and then looked at the files that were
still pointing to the old claim from the
cop who was fired for corruption and pointed
to a source that no one's ever proven
exist that claimed he was probably MS 13.
And that's the thing they always keep pointing
back to, but it's that's why she calls
it double hearsay. The point is because that
got written down from the Home Depot engagement
that never got verified.
They when they stopped him, they go, oh,
okay. So with this context and that statement,
now we consider this could be trafficking. Now
regardless of any of it, they let him
go with a ticket.
That's it.
That's the story. So then now looking back,
the US administration is trying to relitigate this,
if you even call it that, and saying
that what actually happened all the way back
then was human trafficking. We're gonna charge him
for it. Despite the cops there getting a
ticket and not being able to prove that,
and it's just rooted back to one statement
that still hasn't been proven.
That's the ridiculousness of this whole case. And
yet people like Stephen Miller know will triple
down
aggressively because they are locked into this narrative.
And, really, as we go through many times,
and I think one point today, because they
know what's gonna happen if they challenge what
Trump wants. Regardless of the evidence, regardless of
their personal consequences,
It's pretty clear by now. We can see
that.
Look at Gabbard, like, openly lying about her
own statements because Trump told her to.
Now, it goes on to say,
the her in her 51 page report, the
judge disputed claims made by US government that
Abregg Garcia was a member of the gang
MS thirteen.
Do we even need to play Trump's embarrassing
clip yet again?
MS
thirteen.
What a cartoon we live in. It's so
silly. Miller has been vocal in his opposition
to the case of Garcia. Last month, Miller
said, quote, the justice department the Department of
Justice has indicted, which is just an allegation.
Now there is the level of evidence that's
needed, but it's not proof. Like, there the
the people can be indicted for things that
later get proven entirely to be made up.
Like, so the government can patch together the
claims. The judge can look and say, well,
that seems valid based on the insinuation
coming from your authority, and we will continue
that that's what it can be. And, also,
it can be massaged in a way that
when the I've seen indictments that were based
on literally nothing because we live in a
corrupt situation. My point is it's just an
allegation.
But people use point at it as if
that proves the case. They do it all
the time.
But he was indicted.
Justice the DOJ has indicted the illegal alien
terrorist from Maryland. That's how they call that's
what they refer to him as. None of
that's been verified or and basically, all the
evidence they present, in fact, proves that that's
not the case.
The so called Maryland man who was actually
a foreign terrorist from El Salvador to make
him face justice for his monstrous crimes against
humanity.
Just so much so hyperbolic.
I've never argued that I know for a
fact that he's not something, because that'd be
a silly thing to say. But the evidence
we have in front of us in no
way proves what they're claiming. And why would
I then assume that he is something based
on no evidence? That seems stupid.
The point is I would never argue I
know he's not, and I'm not certain maybe
there's case out there that proves it, but
they have never made the case. They have
never proven that, and the evidence in front
of us, in fact, shows that he's not.
That's the proof that's the reality of it.
Miller claimed Gregor Garcia had committed, quote, this
is what he said, some of the most
heinous crimes I've ever read about.
Well, we know the we know the evidence.
We know all the information.
What are you talking about?
Having people in a car driving across state
lines? Allegations of of beating your wife even
though the wife denies that that's what happened?
What are we talking about? Are you talking
about your your secret source who claims on
top of this as of, what, seven years
later that now he remembers that there was
dangerous things that were done with children? I
mean, they've just lobbed on a bunch of
stuff that nobody can back up that tie
back to yet another anonymous source. For all
we know, that's not even real. But even
that, you're gonna say that's the most heinous
crime you've ever read about?
I mean, we know he's being dishonest by
making it that hyperbolic. And he goes, a
very dangerous person. In April, he pushed the
claims to Fox News' Jesse Waters, who, you
know, they platform every moron and every port
government position that benefits the government narrative. He
is an illegal alien, he says. And and
by the way, no, he's not. Because the
reality is he was allowed a withholding of
removal by Trump's administration,
which doesn't make him legally in the country,
but it does not make him illegally here
either. That's a situation where they give him
the allowance to stay until they rule further.
Now fine. You can argue that's why he
could be removed. I wouldn't disagree with that,
like, if they then decided to. But that
is when you come back to the process
of claims due process and especially not being
sent to El Salvador where the Supreme Court
had already ruled, or he couldn't based on
what Trump's last administration said. Now if you
don't if you're confused by all that, it's
it's it's information that we've been covering the
entire time. It's irrelevant to the main point
now. It's been this circular logic of nonsense
right up until this point. But an illegal
alien, my point is he's wrong about that,
and
implicated in human trafficking because you guys add
that on based on basically nothing and then
add it to port to port to port.
I mean, just it's everything about him just
I mean and look. This is just my
personal opinion. But the way even the way
he looks, it's like he's
irritated that he has to be here talking
to you. You know what I mean? Like,
he's like, this I this feeling of just,
like, you know, it just screams dishonesty. And
that's I felt like that before I ever
knew what he was. You you get an
impression about somebody, and you look at their
face and that you there you could you
get the impression that he's somebody who is
you know, like, for example, like, Trump or
Elon Musk. I had the very same thing
from Elon Musk when he was up talking
about MAGA and saving the country. Like, it
was he was it was actually poorly playing
a role. You could tell he was putting
on an act, but people don't care. And
this guy is very clearly like, it's like
he's laughing at you in his mind. That's
the feeling I get. Now it says the
again, just my opinion. The order from Holmes,
however, said the government had failed to prove
Garcia was a serious risk. That's the first
part.
To flee and obstruct justice. They claimed he's
you know, there's no that he's a illegal
terrorist monster, rapist, whatever, that he's gonna flee
the country if we don't keep him in
jail.
They disagreed because, in fact, you look at
the evidence, there's really nothing but insinuation that
makes that case. And it says, quote, overall,
the court cannot find from the evidence presented.
That's what matters. They are the ones that
gave the evidence. So if it falls short
for making the case, that's on the fault
of the government.
And we've already seen the evidence because it's
not there.
That from the evidence presented that Garcia's release
clearly and convincingly poses an irredeemable danger that
it doesn't. It says that,
well, this overall, the court cannot find from
the evidence presented that Garcia's release clearly and
convincingly poses an irredeemable danger to others in
the community.
Meaning that the evidence does not prove that
he's a risk or a danger.
Now it says Holmes also slammed government evidence
that Garcia is a member of MS thirteen,
saying, quote, consists of general statements
and double hearsay.
That's it, guys. The government patching together this
hoping they'll get
influence over the judge. You know, exactly what
they want you to think is happening from
the other side and probably is. But just
realize as they're screaming about people manipulating judicial
process, that's what they're doing too.
And stated that he has, quote, no criminal
history
of any kind, because that's true.
I mean, think about that, guys. Now, you
can have citations for traffic tickets. You can
have the insinuation about the possibility behind all
these things, but nothing ever actually happened. He
doesn't have a record.
Doesn't that matter anymore?
It says, quote, the court does not find
that these circumstances, when considered together,
compel a,
determination that a rego poses a risk of
danger to the community
or has the proclivity
and incentive to flee rather than face prosecution
of the case.
Holmes and the US district court for Middle
Tennessee ordered Garcia released from prison as he
awaits trial.
However,
this is the same roundabout nonsense we've been
dealing with the entire time with all of
them, Khalil, Ozturk.
However, his fate remains in limbo after the
government appealed the order to release him on
Sunday.
See, this is how this goes. And so
when they always wanna push back about so
when a court ends up ruling against them
and they scream that it's in violation, this
is how the spot the process goes. And
they're playing it even though there's no real
evidence to appeal with. They're just doing it
to get the motions going, to drag this
out even further, to punish him even further.
And they'll present some statement or some arbitrary
thing, and the judge will yet again go,
you're wasting the court's time. There's no information.
They they've done this many times. This whole
supreme court roundabout was frustrating for everybody. And
judge Zenas and the other one, they were
just confounded.
Like, you're just deliberately playing this out. We
all see what you're doing. Oh, we can't
bring him back. What do you want us
to bring in a an illegal terrorist and
smuggle him in the country? Nobody ever said
that.
The problem here now is that they're just
gonna drag this out. And says Holmes reflected
on this in her opinion and said, quote,
what they did,
the the the roundabout the the basically appealing
it and dragging forward suggest the court's determination
of the detention issues is little more than
an academic exercise.
So you wonder why these judges are being
are getting frustrated both left and right, conservative
and and liberal,
even the ones Trump appointed who are who
ruled about against them in Texas and said,
you guys are being illegitimate.
That's it from the one he appointed.
The what they're saying is, we roll on
this and you act like it's a like
it's a suggestion.
Following the government's appeal, that was my framing
of what they said, the Maryland father will
now be placed in custody with ICE,
pending deportation
again.
You see how this goes, guys? So that
I mean, they're just muscling this through. And
if you wanna look at anybody being illegitimate
in this process, it's the current administration,
which in my opinion would be no different
than whoever else would be in left or
right. It's just the reality is what they're
doing is exactly what they're trying to accuse
everybody else of.
Pending deportation. So you have a Supreme Court
ruling, you've got multiple under court rulings, now
you got another ruling on top of this
after they bring him back that says, no.
He's not a gang member. There's no evidence
to back this up, and they'll well appeal
it and just keep him in prison.
Same thing he did with Khalil and Ozturk
until they were literally forced more more than
once over to remove them.
Now it says another court hearing is due
to take place on Wednesday afternoon, so two
days from now.
Set on the conditions for his release. So
they're gonna come back and they're gonna push,
and we'll follow-up on it. But it just
the the these are lawless
like, as as
George Galloway coined, as at least as I
remember, rampant lawlessness.
Rampant lawlessness. And that then bleeds into everything
else. Why do you think that's the case?
Look at who they work with, guys. Look
at who they're partners with.
Now as Aaron Melnick points out, who by
the way, if you wanna look back at
his but since this situation started, that's why
I've been referencing him. He's been right about
everything he's been talking about. He's and that's
because he's not guessing. He's simply saying this
is what the documents say. Here's what the
law says. I'm a lawyer, and here's what
should be happening.
Now I'm sure he's got his own political
leanings like everybody, but the bottom line is
he has been consistent on showing you the
information proved they're wrong, and now and and
we've been backing it up with our own
research. Every single serious accusation against mister Garcia
comes from people who are currently in prison
and will be getting out early thanks to
giving information to him
on him to the Trump DOJ.
Exactly as we expected. So that doesn't have
you can't then say that proves that they're
lying. Right? But you have to understand how
easy it is to coerce testimony, especially testimony
about something from almost a decade ago.
That the people involved at the time decided
was not what they thought it was, gave
them a citation. So now you're gonna find
and how did you even follow this up?
Find randomly finding people that somehow knew him
from some back how do I mean, unless
they can prove
that these people did, in fact, know him
and prove that there's a connection and why
they would have this insight, if it's just
them claiming they have the I was there
that day or something, it's I mean, why
would we take that at face value with
all the lies they've been caught with so
far? I mean, literally, to the point to
where they've been forced to do this now.
I mean, this is built on six other
lies, so now they're trying to use a
final lie to put those other six to
bed. Because this is about not even going
back to the first conversation. They're just trying
to jump to the say, well, how was
human trafficking? Fine then. We'll ignore all the
rest and jump forward with a brand new
claim.
They've lied about everything else before this.
And now leaning on people in prison because
that's trustworthy. And he says, as the and
as the magistrate judge pointed out, their claims,
at times, defy physical reality.
Here is what Glenn Thrush pointed out.
You almost never see a judicial dunk on
DOJ like the denunciation of the government's charges
against Garcia. The allegations against him border on
physical impossibility,
said the magistrate.
It says the court gives little weight to
this hearsay testimony,
double hearsay through special agent Joseph's testimony of
the first male cooperative. See, that's what they
do. They have him repeat what he's what
he
basically, repeat what they know from other allegations
and then act like that's double con confirmation
as opposed to him just repeating what he
read that was given to by the same
person.
This is classic government tactic stuff, guys. And
it says of the first male cooperator, a
two time previous deported felon.
That's who they're using to back this up.
And acknowledged ringleader of a human smuggling operation.
So you're literally working with human traffickers to
go after somebody who appears to not be
doing that.
And who and says, who has now obtained
for himself an early release from federal prison
and delay of a sixth deport sixth deportation
by providing information to the government. So now
you're allowing a guy to not be deported,
who in fact has been deported six, five
other times and is snuck back in? Guys,
this guy represents everything they claim they're fighting,
and they're allowing him to stay so Garcia
can be sent away.
You're either honest about this or you're not.
You're either only in this for my team
or you're in this for what you actually
care about in your principles. You can't have
both because it's really obvious what's happening here.
And it says, nor do the hearsay statements
of the second male cooperator on this issue
face
fair any better as his requested release from
jail and delay of another deportation depends on
providing information the government finds useful.
Even without discounting the weight of the testimony
of the first and second male cooperator for
for the multiple layers of hearsay, their testimony
and statements defy common sense. Now you realize
she's talking about all not just the claim
of being a gang member and this going
back to the beginning, but the claims of
human trafficking, everything. The new people they're presenting,
she's calling it all hearsay because that's what
we're dealing with.
Both male cooperators stated that other than three
or four total trips total without his children,
Abrego typically took his children with him during
the alleged smuggling trips from Maryland to Houston
and back. So you see, you could simply
call a man who's bringing his children with
him to pick up other workers to go
back and work with his boss. And, yes,
you could just argue that because they're illegal
here illegally that that's the biggest deal in
the world. It's there's there's crime being committed
if you're here illegally in the first place.
But come from someone who's worked in restaurants
and how often I drove around our dishwashers
to go do other events, and you could
call me. You you could say that was
human trafficking based on the same argument.
You know there's a difference here. And the
point is maybe it is as bad as
it sounds or maybe it's him driving workers
to go work with his boss because as
even Donald Trump said, there's plenty of illegal
aliens in food and restaurants and hotels that
are okay.
And his kids coming along almost prove, if
you, you know, look at it that way,
that this is benign because he's bringing them
along for the trip. Consider both is my
point. And all the evidence and the judges
and everybody else involved other than the people
who have an interest in lying about this
are telling you that that's what's going on.
It says
some 200 2,900
miles round trip as often as three week
per, per week or three three or four
times per week. The sheer number of hours
that would be required to maintain the schedule
and so that that she's claiming that the
trips they're claiming how many times, which they're
the ones bringing this in they're introducing that,
require the the the sheer numbers of hours
required to maintain the schedule would consistently be
more than a hundred twenty hours per week
of driving time. Approach physical impossibility.
So without them like, them they're try I
bet you there's, like, an arbitrary mileage number
they needed to include, like,
like surpass some kind of legal barrier. That's
just my gut tells me that. And so,
they just use that number. And then, it
turns out that based on metrics and and
and distance that, as she's saying, that becomes
near physically impossible for him to have ever
done. You see, they don't I I actually
think we're dealing with people that are far
like, they think they're way smarter than they
actually are.
It says, for that additional reason, the court
finds the statements of the first and second
male cooperators
are not reliable to establish that this case
involves a minor victim, which is like the
core thing they're pushing. He even
manipulated his own children. These people are disgusting.
What they're willing to lie about and do
just to serve their master is absolutely disgusting.
It appalls me.
We will talk about this more.
Now we also talk about Mahmoud Khalil,
the show we covered on March 13, the
US government's flagrant attack on free speech. Mahmoud
Khalil was just the beginning, which clearly we
all saw continue.
Here
is a follow-up to that. This is the
recent this is from 06/20/2025,
which is three days ago. Columbia protester, Mamed
Khalil, freed from immigration attention. Now the real
crime is how long they kept him with
no charge. I mean, unbelievable.
I mean, actually, not unbelievable, actually shockingly common,
but still just very, very
vivid.
Now, it says Palestinian activist,
Malbud Khalil, was released Friday from federal immigration
attention after
a hundred and four days.
Never charged with a crime.
Hundred and four days.
I mean, just think about that. The the
that's in principle, it's no different than an
American. Same constitutional rights, same dynamic. You're being
arrested without charge and held in prison. That
that is exactly what we're dealing with, an
illegitimate power structure that it will do whatever
it wants, whenever it wants, trying to sell
you on the idea that what they're doing
is freedom.
The former Columbia University graduate student left a
federal facility in Louisiana, which is where they
sent him, by the way, not where he's
from because they they felt like the Louisiana
court would and system there would be more
amenable to what they wanted, which it is.
He is expected to head to New York
to reunite with his US citizen wife and
his infant son, born in this country, both
born while Khalil was detained.
The Trump administration is seeking to deport Khalil,
and this is what the AP wrote, so
see the present, because it's the reality. In
court, this is what they presented despite claiming
outwardly something else.
He was released,
or rather, they're they're seeking his deport to
deport him
over his role in a pro Palestinian protest.
That's the end of the sentence.
He was detained on March 8 at his
appoint apartment building in Manhattan.
He realized, again, this is not just ape.
That's what is actually happening. They presented the
argument that what he's doing,
being a protester there and having his ideas
in his country as a national security threat.
So all they're simply saying is there is
no free speech. There is no ideological freedom
in this country as if it bumps up
against Israel, which is the whole overarching point
that we are showing every day.
Khalil was released after US district judge Michael
Farbiars Farbiars
that's an interesting name, Farbiars,
said it would be highly, highly unusual
for the government to continue detaining a legal
US resident who was, like, unlikely to flee
and hadn't been accused of any violence.
In fact, I don't even know of what
crime they think they're accusing him of other
than some big, like, national security
blob. There's no he didn't he didn't what
law did he actually violate?
It's it's wild.
Quote, petitioner is not a flight risk, and
the evidence presented is that he is not
a danger to the community. Period. Full stop.
Isn't there a weird consistency here that are
taking people who simply just had you know,
they were used
for the agenda.
And now the courts are it's flushing out
to where they you were lying about them.
But now everyone's so distracted by something else
that no one's even
many people are not folding this in.
Look at how they egregiously lied to us
about such foundational ideas in this country. Who
do you think was behind that?
The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who
participate
in such demonstrations,
you know, legal acts of protest, saying I
don't think what Israel is doing is okay,
should be deported
as it it considers their views anti Semitic.
This is their presented argument. So apparently, in
this country, you're no longer allowed to have
a certain view.
You realize that's that's that's the principle.
Whether it's antisemitic or anti this or anti
that or whatever you wanna talk about, they're
simply saying you're not allowed to think that.
You're not allowed to say that. Is that
what we think meshes with this country?
They'll sure as hell tell you the opposite,
but they're proving you proving to all of
us that they're not who they pretend to
be. Protesters and civil rights groups say the
administration is conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel
in order to silence the
sin. Well, you know what? That's flatly irrelevant.
It's not it's not that, well, they're conflating
it. It's not even antisemitism. It's irrelevant if
it's antisemitism. It's irrelevant. It is an idea.
It is a thought. It's speech. It doesn't
matter.
Even them saying that makes it sound like,
well, if it was antisemitic, it wouldn't be
okay. That's ridiculous.
If you if you wanna be racist against
Jewish people or black people, whatever, I will
I will personally say you're a disgusting person.
That'd be my opinion. But I'll also defend
forever your right to say those things. Because
that's what free speech actually looks like. And
we all know this, the same old argument.
You don't defend the worst. You don't defend
it all. We all know this. That's why
so many people are starting to break free
from how obvious all this is based on
emotional woke right politics, just like the woke
left.
The judge has ruled that the government
can't deport Khalil on the basis of its
claims, that his presence
could undermine foreign policy. That's literally all they
had. But the judge gave the administration leeway,
of course, to continue pursuing a potential deportation
based on allegations, get this,
that he lied on his green card application.
An accusation Khalil disputes.
That's what Rubio has been that's the crutch
they have. So think about the the broken
logic here. You're so he's saying he lied
on his green card about being
anti Semitic, about being anti Israel, about being
a Hamas terrorist or whatever they're claiming, which
none of these things, the way they're framing
it, make any sense. If you're trying to
insinuate that he's a terrorist, well, the evidence
already shows you that's not true. So they're
proving to court that you have nothing to
back up to keep him in jail.
They didn't charge him with anything. But then
saying he lied on his green
card. About what? Being a terrorist. But you
didn't charge him for anything. And around and
around did it go. The point is they're
trying to insinuate that had he told us
that he was gonna, what, protest legally a
different country,
that we wouldn't have let him in the
country. And the idea that he somehow mapped
out this long term plan to illegally, which
wasn't illegal, protest Israel about things we all
care about is just childish.
But they're gonna literally go to town about
this and try to argue that he
somehow prove say he lied on a green
card. How you would ever prove that based
on the idea that you would somehow know
you'd be doing things years down the line,
and none of it's against the law. So
it just it's it proves itself, guys. They
are floundering in this conversation.
I very much think that's relevant to everything
else we're dealing with. Now so many people
tried to make the big thing out of
this. Megyn Kelly was one of the, go
home, she said, back to Syria, I guess,
because she's uneducated about the topic. This is
this is Mohammed Khalil.
Right? The guy who told you was a
flight risk. He's gonna run back to a
foreign country the moment he gets free. We
can't let him. Even though they're gonna deport
him, which doesn't make much sense. Right?
Here he is, after being released, who went
right back to protesting for what he believes
in. Because guess what? That's the legal reality
of this country that we all understand, and
now he's out there protesting again. And they
go, breaking. Mama Kaleo's protesting right outside the
gates of Columbia University, and standing with him
is irrelevant.
Now they're saying the Maralo Del Los Santos
of the People's Forum. Okay. So now it's
a guilt by association again? Is that the
best you can do? You realize the first
time they said he was at the protest
next to all these people. That's irrelevant.
The real the reality is there's a hell
of a lot of people at these protests.
And just because they're there together does not
mean that they're all on the same side
with all the same arguments or even that
because they have same, the same opinion that
they're somehow guilty of something.
The reality is you don't know what he
thinks because you're
well, first, let's put it this way. He's
been clear about his opinions.
He stated them. You can research it. You
can look at his consistent background, how long
he's been doing. And then you guys can
make up things about what he says. Now
can you prove any of this? Can you
prove that he's secretly working for Hamas or
that he hates Jewish people? In fact, you
can literally prove the opposite.
So now that he come back out to
protest with a Palestinian flag on, is literally
protesting for Palestine.
The best they can do is try to
continue to conflate him with somebody else's allegations,
somebody else's things.
It's so obvious what's happening.
And in fact, what's crazy about it is
going back out to make the case to
prove to you that I'm simply protesting. Here
we are again, and they can't handle it.
Wills Chamberlain says this guy exemplifies why we
have the Alien Enemies Act.
You see what I'm saying? Like, so what
exactly constitutes the Alien Enemies Act here? The
fact that he's protesting or the fact that
you don't like what side he's on to
protest? None of which is illegal.
These are the people that are destroying this
country, acting like America first when what they're
doing is Zionism first. They're literally destroying this
country, all the things that we hold sacred
because you're being convinced that they're secret Democrats
or whatever the narrative is that gets you
to emotionally
flow over the top and ignore the facts.
He says, we should not have to tolerate
foreigners
in our country.
I mean, how do we guys, how is
this not, like,
like,
jarringly different than what we pretend we are?
This is like what Laura Loomer does, and
it's striking. It's like you're it's like this
gushing hatred,
vile
racism. You know, Muslims shouldn't be allowed in
congress, and everybody knows that's insane.
And she goes agitating on behalf of our
adversaries. So now you're now you're insinuating he's
working for somebody else.
Go ahead. We'll make the case. Lay out
your evidence, bud. And when we recognize that
you literally have none, we'll throw you in
the same category, which you're already there, with
all of the other moron politicians who scream
whatever they want you to think and have
no evidence to back it up. These people
are not working for you. They're working for
a foreign country.
And I I I'm not saying that based
on
him being paid or something. I I don't
know.
What he's doing is in the interest of
Israel, whether he knows that or not.
That is
that that's the clearest thing in the conversation.
Tolerate foreigners in our country,
agitating on behalf. So what he really means
is there, we can't allow people who we
see as other
be here
and
protest against what they don't like.
As long as Will doesn't like that, though.
See, if Will finds it distasteful, then you're
then you will throw you out of prison.
Doesn't sound like freedom, democracy, and the America
we pretend we live in.
No. It's starting to sound more like a
Zionism Israel to me.
Mike from PA says, you should absolutely not
be prosecuted for treason as an unregistered foreign
agent,
which I I mean, I don't agree with.
That's evidence to back it up. Right? Same
kind of argument. But Will says, okay, commie.
You guys have lost the plot. I mean,
they're they're trying to tap into partisan arguments.
So you're the one telling us we should
arrest people for saying ideas. We should put
people in prison who look different than us
because they they are arguing for something you
don't agree with and he's the commie?
Guys, they've lost the plot. Okay? You've got
I mean, it's like always these things. The
left and the right paradigm, the extremists, they're
they're all the same thing. They don't even
realize it.
So talking about the Iran overlap, same kind
of conversation, which all of this stems back
to the same kind of push. I mean,
if you can't see by now that the
tendrils that connect back to the Zionist agenda
on everything we're dealing with right now,
I I don't think you want to see
it. And that doesn't mean it's the only
factor. It's definitely not. But it connects in
every possible way.
Michael Tracy. I wanted to point this out
first and just to in case you missed
it.
M I g a. And we we pointed
to it the other day, but this is
Donald Trump.
And even his supporters were like, that's weird.
Yeah. It's not weird. It's just very clear.
He He says, it's not politically correct, which
by the way, since when did Donald Trump
or any of you believe in being politically
correct?
It's the woke right. It's the same difference.
Now the bottom line is he just doesn't
want you to say the one he's basically
training you on what not to call the
thing he's doing. They go, it's not politically
correct to use the term regime change.
But if a current Iranian regime is unable
to make Iran great again,
why wouldn't we be why wouldn't there be
a regime to so, you know, his typical
both sides of the argument, you take what
you want out of it. Trump said, and
we're not doing that, but he did though.
We started with saying we're not, then he
ended with we are. That's the way he
plays this. Bottom line, he's making it clear
that they want regime change, which by the
way is, woah, bombshell exactly what we've all
been telling you, everybody everywhere, because it's the
most obvious thing to see in the world.
It's been clear since seven countries, five years,
and well before that. But he says, make
Iran great again. But wait a minute. Have
we already made America great again?
Or are we still in the process of
that? So explain for me America may the
MAGA movement. Why we would pause on America
being great again and shift over to make
Iran great again. And in the meantime, mega,
make Israel great again. So right there, he's
focusing on making two other countries great again
before we even accomplish that here. Was that
the promise?
You know where I'm going with this. You
know damn well what I'm getting at, and
you're either honest about it or you're not.
This is not what we said was what
he promised you. Michael Tracy says MAGA influencer
pivot. I I I joked about this last
show.
Trump was not involved with the Israel bomb.
Remember when they first said that? Then it
turned out he was. He was involved. That's
good though because he's helping fight the bad
guy. So nothing means everything, everything means nothing.
That's pro Trump. That's Trump first, not America
first. He's pursuing diplomacy and peace. Peace president.
Then he doesn't do that. The diplomacy was
fake, but that's good. He's bombing Iran, but
no regime change.
He's doing regime change, but that's good. It's
just my point is
it there's nothing sacred. They will go with
whatever is so they're told to do, just
like the politicians.
Thomas Massie
calls this out and says this is not
America first, folks.
It's funny how you can hate someone for
being so obviously correct.
Whoever says it, that's the reality. It's not
America first. It's literally Iran and Israel first.
That's the whole it's right in front of
you.
But he says that, and so Trump goes
to town, which I'll I'll I'll I'll show
you at the end of the show with
the truth the true social feed.
He calls Massey a bum.
I mean, it's it's he is a child
when it comes to this stuff. He cannot
contain himself.
And he is now lashing out
and calling in and get like, trying to
marshal his influence to get this person either
removed
or
voted out
because we call that democracy. Right?
It's blatant.
It looks like there's some breaking news here.
Let me look really quickly before we bring
it in.
And maybe if it's not immediately pressing, we'll
I'll tie it in somewhere. Oops.
Hold on. I put it in the wrong
spot there.
One second.
Alright. Let's see.
If it's not immediately pressing, I'll put it
later in the show.
It looks it just looks like the argument.
I'm I'll I'll bring this up right here.
And look. We will come back to it.
The the statements are that there's been an
agreed on ceasefire, which actually I'm glad. Thank
you to Orwell for sharing that. That really
does make it's important to include for what
I was thinking was going on.
So I don't wanna jump ahead because I'm
gonna get to this in a minute. But
what that gets to is the idea that
this very much does seem to be a,
you know, tactical stand down kind of a
dynamic despite framing it as the opposite,
which which, you know, yes, is exactly what
I did think was gonna happen, but I'm
not gonna pound my chest and be like,
well, because it's not hard to see, guys.
And it's a very common thing that a
lot of people have talked about over the
years. And it's it's happened many times in
the past with Iran and Iraq in the
past discussion and the
traumatic brain injuries that Trump lied about. Remember,
we've talked about this many times. We'll come
back to all this, though.
Let me just make sure I don't miss
this here.
Okay. We'll come back to that.
So continuing back, keeping in mind that there's
been a, like, a deescalation, which is a
very positive thing,
not America first.
So what's weird though, and and I will
say again to cap that off, I also
don't think that it's gonna end at all.
Like, I I whether you think Trump means
that or not is irrelevant, in my opinion.
I think Israel is dictating what the outcome
is here, and I think that's been made
very clear. That's my opinion.
So my point would be if Trump means
what you know, like, believes in the ceasefire,
then I are and I'm gonna argue he's
being played by Israel. That's my opinion.
Or I think that it's them trying to
slow this down for strategic reasons because I
don't think they really got what they wanted
out of all this what what just happened.
I think they're I mean, I don't think
they're prepared for what they're doing, quite frankly.
But that would be a strategic move to
get them to back down so they can
reorganize and come back at it. That's what
I think. So but we'll come back to
that. So back to this.
Not America first. And remember, he's saying regime
change.
So based on what just we just talked
about, that doesn't seem to make sense unless
it's a, you know, sereptitious, like, it's a
sereptitious plan to get them to put their
guard down. But before we go into all
of it, let's talk about the Israel overlap
yet again. Right? I mean, we just we
just played this to start.
Oh, here. I I put it back up.
This is the
Trump
Congress clip
where he says that Israel should control Congress.
No. The biggest change I've seen in congress
is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that ten years
ago, fifteen years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
Wild.
Now here's Kelly Bruce.
Glenn Greenwald says the most amazing part of
this amazingly illuminating video, which you should absolutely
make sure you watch, is that the political
movement could have chosen any slogan it wanted
to describe itself. And it decided it wanted
to be known as America first to do
and say
this.
Being a the the pride of being able
to be here and do work that facilitates,
making things better for people,
and in the greatest country on earth,
next to Israel.
It is, and it's an honor to be
able to make a difference on earth,
next, and in the greatest country on earth,
next to Israel. Country on earth,
next to Israel.
It is, and it's an honor to be
able to make a difference and to be
able to speak
in this regard,
with an administration
that I love so much and I,
and that I feel genuinely represented by.
It's it's a real honor. Yeah. Yeah. That
doesn't surprise me at all, in fact. Remember,
this is I twenty four. This is Israeli
media she's talking to.
And she, you know, does she feel represented
by it because it's a Zionist regime? You
can decide. But what's funny,
this is, cleansed Ken or Ken, excuse me,
says, Trump's state department spoke spokesperson, Tammy Bruce,
says America is the greatest country on Earth
next to Israel.
I just think that's very striking, and I
don't think any Republicans are on that mindset
or, you know, other than the blind pro
Israel ones, which is the major divide happening
right now. So
this is the same clip and saying she's
claiming it was out of context.
So here is the longer video where she
says, sadly not Jewish, and maybe the Italians
were the last tribe, but nothing that changes
her greatest country remark.
So here, Tammy is telling you because this
is what's so telling about this.
Israeli media,
people in The United States pluck it out
and put it all over Twitter.
It shows something that she thought was gonna
be said to Israelis,
and she got out of context because the
people that will blindly support their team will
then yell that down your throat. But here
is the full clip. So you tell me
if this is out of context. Or like,
Tulsi Gabbard, was she was she being taken
out of context, or was she just blatantly
telling you Iran's not seeking a weapon? And
then comes out and says, but I agree
with Trump that they are.
She's being contradictory, and they're lying to you
like this.
I I am not,
and, It starts with are you Jewish? Are
you Jewish? I I am not,
and,
sadly not.
I am,
Italian, which I've always thought maybe the Italians
were the lost tribe. So that could be
the dynamic there. Isn't that just weird, like,
the pandering to that? What is the what
there's there's that's not normal. That is because,
in my opinion, from a political perspective, you
know this is what you're supposed to do
and have always done. Every single person in
power in this country goes and bows at
the altar of Israel every single time. It's
not a secret.
If you wanna make that racist, that's up
to you. I'm talking about the Israeli government
and the power over a lot of things.
But, you know, it's, so it's I'm I'm
honored. I don't mind people thinking that at
all. I I do recall, it's interesting,
after the October seventh attacks.
I went to a jeweler in the World
Trade Center,
to get,
the Star of David to wear on the
air.
And,
and he knows me, and he said, but
you know people will think you're Jewish. And
I said, I hope so. And the point
is is that at a time like that,
and throughout certainly throughout history, is that we
all have to be Jewish. We all have
to be
recognized
as this is about humanity, about the nature
also of the Jewish people and the western
civilization that we all enjoy that make life
worth living.
Why in the world would you have to
pretend to be Jewish or be seen as
Jewish to make have
solidarity with people that are suffering in your
mind.
It didn't make any sense.
Do you do that when something happens to
relate, you know, to a Muslim culture?
I mean, it it just show there's a
very clear weirdness around this design, and it's
one-sided.
It's not if you if, like, that's the
just the stark the most obvious point right
there is to conflate if you if you
somehow don't have the same compassion for things
that happen to other people in other parts
of the world,
then that's called hypocrisy.
Or you can make your case about why
you think one's more important than the other,
but that gets to the point of the
argument.
The the nature of the Judeo Christian ethic,
the impact of the, Jewish people throughout history,
the,
inventions,
the medicine, the education that is delivered by
Israel.
But really the Jewish people around the world,
it is,
you you have, I've thought and I've said
said before,
you have really two options with the Jewish
people.
You can be envious or you can be
grateful.
Think about that statement.
I mean, what are you talking about? Like,
so, like, every Jewish person is the same
thing? I mean, that's why Orthodox Jews around
the world are screening that they're not represented
by Zionism, that this is a political organization,
and it's growing every single day. I mean,
listen to that statement again.
Before.
You have really two options with the Jewish
people.
You can be envious or you can be
grateful.
Envious or grateful? No. This is exactly what
drives people to think that this is all
about Jewish people.
Whether she knows it or not, this is
a Zionism manipulation for you to think, in
my opinion, that this is she's trying to
tell you that you have to either bow
or or support. Or, again, I'm looking at
the words again. Bill, but, really, the Jewish
people around the world,
it is,
you you have I've thought and I've said
before,
you have really two options with the Jewish
people.
You can be envious or you can be
grateful. Envious or grateful.
So you can either envy what what the
fact that they're Jewish or be grateful for
for what you perceive them to have done
for the world. That's it?
Like, doesn't that say it, like, a very
sick perspective of what people are supposed to
be or some kind of hierarchy? That's exactly
the point, guys.
Nobody is more supreme than anybody else. There's
no the idea that there's some kind of
supremacist race, whether black or white or anything
else
is is exactly the thing we all pretend
we're fighting everywhere else.
Right?
Except when it's Israel
because they're special.
It's it's it's just very weird.
And people will do everything they can to
make this about race to rather make it
about religion or race for that same point
even though it's not. At least what I
at least from where I'm talking from this,
this is about the the obvious
manipulation
of a lot of different things, but more
specifically for as we're talking today of the
US government by a foreign government, and doing
so at the expense of Americans through a
tie call of America first. It's just wild.
And, I am
enormously grateful,
for the nature of living this life in
the modern age,
with also knowing,
the natures
for our world at really, from the beginning
of time. Also also know this is just
this diatribe. There's no questions. They just basically
gave her the kid. Go.
Now read the script. Who knows? But I
basically just let her talk for five minutes.
That seems a little weird. Right? Like, they
just expected her to be I mean, everything
about this seems so wrong. It seems weird.
The nature of violence, of suffering,
of of life being difficult for so many,
and
the the dynamic of whether or not we
become victims perpetually.
And the struggle of the Jewish people and
the survival
of Jews around the world,
through millennia,
shows us that in fact, yes,
sometimes things will be difficult, that envy does
drive awful
you don't need to become a victim, that
it is about looking forward,
for family, for the The exact opposite of
what Zionism teaches, that you're a perpetual victim
for the rest of your life forever. And
if you think otherwise, then you hate us.
That's, like, might as well be tattooed on
the forehead of Zionists. It's not a joke.
The future,
and for, really, the rest of the world.
So it's,
it's
it's been an exciting trajectory for me in
dealing with politics and culture,
and, of course, the people who've influenced me,
who've been very generous with me.
It really had an impact on my sense
of what matters, and what we should be
grateful for. I wanna ask you because people
who have come through this role as a
spokesperson here at the state department, they've traditionally
been from
foreign service officer backgrounds. They've dealt in media
relations, and maybe they Yeah. So not a
completely uneducated, uninformed,
without lacking credentials person. Yeah. You're not right
for the job. They were in the national
security,
sector, but they have a a rich background
in foreign policy. Now you obviously come from
the media world, but from a different angle.
And like a lot of Trump administration picks,
kind of
outside the box. I mean, how did this
all come about? Yes. Yes. I was, Basically,
an insult package to something else, which is
hilarious to me. So you're bad at this,
and you don't have credentials. Why is that?
With Fox News for twenty three years.
Prior to that, I Like HEGSAT and the
rest. We're this might as well be the
Azov movement Zelensky,
you know, one plus one TV station administration.
It's the same dynamic. We've seen this before.
Was yeah. I'm also a writer, so I've
written a few books on,
philosophy, but really culture and politics.
And prior to that was, a a a
left wing activist, if you will. That that
was much earlier. Oh, another Democrat in the
Republican administration. How funny is that? And, of
course, as one gets older, you see what
works and what doesn't work.
But I I think that it really is
the combination of of,
really kind of civil rights work in a
certain sense.
And David Horowitz had a big impact on
me in that regard. Mhmm. And David who's
recently passed away was a tremendous influence on
me. And many people
who were finding themselves,
lost from the left. Right? When we we
became aware of the nature of what can
happen with politics and how
the left was not exactly
something that was
beneficial for people or actually wanted success for
people. So the left as as a a
political idea,
but your principles are the same. Right, though,
Pammy? I mean, just the same point I
make about gathered the rest. Like, the way
they talk about it, it's like a football
team. They weren't doing well, so I jumped
over to the other side. I it's just
that's the most embarrassing statement you could ever
make in this conversation. You have no principles.
That are we are are are you of
the mind that the only difference is a
letter next to your name and the principles
are the same? You can't make both arguments.
So clearly, you guys are showing that you
have nothing sacred, that you're jumping the there.
I think they all think of it like
this. It's power seeking
hungry mad power seeking maniacs. That's how all
that's how politicians are in my mind.
And he was
a a a a real supporter of people,
kind of like lost sheep in a certain
sense, to make sure that they had the
space
to grow and understand what was happening. So
in my early days, there was many influences
like that. And, David continued to be an
influence, having gone from the left to the
right himself,
and then, of course, with Andrew Breitbart was
an influence there,
and with myself.
So I, started January 20 with everybody else,
had no idea what to expect,
and it's been
like learning a different language.
It is I've also a lot of people
describe it as like drinking from a fire
hose.
And That's that's how you wanna have your
government described. Right?
You
there the good news is, yes, foreign service
officers, the people working here,
civil servants
have been amazing.
And without them,
I would not have been able to have
started
to do my job,
at all. It's been a a remarkable
education,
in many, many different ways. Perhaps I should
not be feeling pride about something like this,
but, you know, that I'm I feel like
we're all guests in a way.
But really the the the pride of being
able to be here and do work that
facilitates,
making things better for people,
and in the greatest country on earth,
next to Israel.
It is,
and And then you've seen the rest.
So Tammy lied is the point.
Struggle through all that to prove that Tammy
literally is lying about being misrepresented.
Why would she do that?
Why would she pretend she was misrepresented?
You could think it though. It's not that
complicated because she knows that this is not
what you want. So she's lying to you.
She's pretending to be America first when really
she's something else.
Here we are.
Here is Tim Poole talking about the same
thing, and he says, brave of her to
finally admit what we already know.
For the podcast,
no. That's not where it's going. He follows
up by saying, Israel is the greatest country
on Earth.
That's what Chipotle wrote. So you might at
first, you know and I've seen this for,
like, Luke Kadowski employee. Like, Jones does it
all the time where
they'll kind of they'll tweet out the thing
that they know everyone wants him to say,
but that's not really what he put in
every other show is about pushing something else.
But then he could point back and say,
see. I know a regime change, and that
was really the it was a false flag
or whatever it is.
Brave of her to finally admit what we
already knew. What you're thinking, oh, is he
gonna call out the fact that Israel's controlling
the country? No. No. No. No. Not Tim.
He'll run from that screaming. Israel is the
greatest country on Earth.
That just seems like a really weird thing
to say. They're they're this is doubling down
on top of something others are confused about.
It shows you what's going on in my
opinion.
Gray zone with another report, meet the Israeli
fanatic running the office of senator Ted Cruz.
Shouldn't be surprising. We just talked about him
and old Tucker back and forth and all
this.
It's not hard to see, guys. And it's
not unique to left or right. It's not
unique to Cruz or it's it's the whole
damn thing.
What? Read the report, and you already know
the information.
And overlapping censorship point, which is interesting,
Todd Todd Cameron
you know what's what's interesting, by the way,
to think about the again, the point from
beginning about Twitter and all this? Because Elon
Musk has pulled his face out of the
conversation for the most part,
people just seem to not be focusing on
I mean, that's exactly why he did it,
I think. You know, Tesla was struggling and
people are attacking. He he was he was
just like the the broken cog and everything.
He was just standing out, which I kinda
think was the point. I kinda think he
they drew a lot of the criticism and
attacks while a lot of other stuff was
going on, but he was also part of
it. It's just a thought a feeling I
have. Now my point is, there's still a
lot of horrible things going on in censorship
on this platform, but it's not getting as
much attention.
But to that point, this is not Twitter.
This is Truth Social.
Todd Cameron
got censored on Truth Social.
For all those out there trying to tell
you this platform is not censoring for Israel
or anybody or anything else, you're wrong. The
Truth Social just censored either for an Israel
point or for Trump, however you wanna frame
it. Now you could call this crude. You
can call it distasteful. Call whatever you want.
The point is, here's what he he he
said,
Iran are terrorists because they don't have nukes
and won't register the nukes they don't have.
But Israel, who do have nukes and are
responsible for every war The United States Of
Israel has been in since World War one,
attacked and killed thirty four and hospitalized a
134 sailors in The US' liberty trying to
sink it in cahoots with the United States
of Israel government, are openly committing genocide on
Palestinians and have not registered their nukes, and
they somehow aren't terrorists.
In fact, and this is the I'll skip
the crude statements. The something something so called
representatives
call them the greatest allies. MAGA are imbeciles.
Right. So if you want are are you
not allowed to say crude words on this
platform, or are you just not allowed to
point out the truth of Israel's influence over
the government on Trump's platform?
You could decide
for, you know, this kind of image, by
the way, that you do this. And not
and the point is
censorship happening around things like that doesn't make
much sense.
Because we're not we're not I mean, we're
not are we gonna pretend that you can't
post a crude image? That's it's a shadowed
image. And the bottom line is he said
something you you might cry distasteful, but it's
not it's not even a cuss word. It's
not yet he just got censored off true
social. I think you know why.
I think this is happening all over the
place. I just think it's worth pointing out
that it's also happening on Trump's platform, which
I think is more obvious.
Now Bennett Johnson put this out today.
Matt Gaetz reveals Epstein was an operator for
a foreign government in a bombshell.
Look over here, guys. Look over here as
we yell at you from two controlled entities,
the thing that people like us have been
saying for a very long time.
It's just silly to me that why is
this
even we have Acosta,
a government representative who openly stated that. We've
had coverage of this for a very long
time. Do we need Matt Gaetz to pretend
like he's now a truth teller, sub just
outside the government now breaking it all down
for you? We don't need him to tell
you what you should already know. This is
a controlled shift. That's what these are trying
to be, to recreate some network of people
you think you can trust.
I think that's what they're all doing.
Epstein was an operator for a foreign government
and The United States, by the way. See,
they're trying to kind of remove these things
around as it suits their interest to keep
The US involved in forever wars. Oh, I
see. So in this case, you're trying to
make it sound like Israel's manipulating the US
government, and they're trying that. And so Trump's
trying to fight away from that in his
own secret way because he's gonna save Israel
for last. That's the kind of dumb stuff
you get from these people. I just wanna
point out that you're getting this kind of
argument now,
not for the truth. This is an old
bit of information they're trying to use to
manipulate you today. That's how this works. In
my opinion, anyway, take it for what it's
worth.
Now talking about the content the the ongoing
situation with Israel and Iran and The United
States.
Oh, I'm sorry. One I've this forgot this
one. I wanted to make sure we talked
about as well because this is one of
the pressing things in people's minds. Like, the
the back and forth, the bombings are still
continuing as far as I could tell despite
the claim of a ceasefire. We'll get that
in a minute, which isn't surprising. It's the
same thing Israel's done in Gaza and anywhere
else. They pretend we want some kind of
an agreement, and then Israel bombs and Israel
sabotages, and and everyone blames somebody else. And
this has already happened in this conversation. Let's
not forget that Israel Iran and The United
States were in conversation when Israel started bombing
them.
So now if you wanna pretend they made
a deal and Israel's bombing them while it's
happening, why would they maintain that deal? But
they're gonna turn around and say Iran violated
the deal. That's what they do. I'm I'm
just guessing. We'll see in a second when
we get there.
But the sleeper sales point is kind of
coming off that argument of the two part
of the, you know, partisan manipulators.
As I said before, I would never discount
the possibility of this in any sense. From
China, from Russia, from Iran, from Israel, from
anybody.
Obviously, I mean, this is a very real
possible thing. So is there evidence to back
up the claim? Which is all that really
matters. Right? Well, as far as I can
tell, it's a bunch of insinuation and,
you know, partisan manipulators who are claiming that
someone told them that or my secret source
of the government said, which by the way,
I still think is funny that the rebels
find the deep state now just seem to
regurgitate what the government tells them. Isn't that
a funny shift or really expected, quite frankly?
Iran threatened Trump.
It would activate sleeper cells if US attacked.
Okay. We made fun of this yesterday.
And I I'll just show you what Candace
said, which is the same thing.
It's really it really is breathtaking how dumb
the CIA believes American citizens are. They want
us to believe Iran called up Trump and
was like, hey. We probably probably should tell
you this, but we have sleeper cells and
terrorists in The United States, and we're planning
to activate them.
If you don't recognize yet, why why that's
stupid?
Just think about why they would have a
secret thing that they could use to manipulate
or to attack or whatever.
And that before they activate the secret thing,
they go, Trump, we're gonna do the secret
thing. You better you're not ready. You better
watch out.
I agree. It's like it's so it's either
an example of how ridiculous they are. So,
like, that our own government people or our
own intelligence are are been so manipulated and
downgraded over the years because of whoever else
is controlling things that they're just that stupid,
or there's a reason they want this to
be fault to be flat. I I don't
know, really.
But something
for the I guess, take it at face
value, it's insane to think that they thought
that would make sense.
My I guess what I'm getting at is
it's certainly possible that maybe they wanted you
to think through this and see it. I'm
always thinking many steps as I hand I
can as I can ahead. But regardless,
that is what the gateway punter reported, which
is embarrassing.
This is funny to me.
And this is one of these reports. Iran
has warned Trump that it would launch sleeper
cells. Or in other words, what he means
is this is what the government made up
to make that hype scare work for people,
or it's what Israel did pretending to be
Iran or any number of other possibilities. But,
you know, mindless partisans report what they're gonna
partisans are gonna partisan. You know? Nick Sorter
came out as we showed you, pointing out
Tom Homan, you know, the government, because that's
what the rebels in fighting the deep state
do. They repeat the government's claims that he
says, well, Joe Biden let in millions of
unknown guy, you know, in his mumble.
So wait a minute. Now it's Biden with
a four year sporadic letting in of random
people?
Did you did you check them all so
you know they're terrorists for Iran? Or are
you just insinuating that they might be in
that big group people? You know, the number
you keep lying about on top of that.
This is the frustrating thing about average people.
Like, this is silly and unfounded. Like, what
they're saying is something that's abstract.
That what he just made clear is that
we don't know anything. We're just throwing out
the scare tactic like they thought a thousand
times over because it's certainly possible, but then
they articulate it in a way that makes
you feel that it's absolutely real and we're
all about to die.
What gives me comfort is knowing that we
have Kash Patel, you know, the guy who
just said, we need to wake up and
prioritize Israel.
That's that person too.
Here
was DC Draino's tweet
about the same thing, which I find very
telling how these manipulators always try to kinda
cultivate what they say and don't say when
they make a mistake instead of owning up
to it, which was this, which I have
saved from yesterday's show. Isn't that weird? It
shrunk again. Why does that happen? I have
a screenshot right there.
DC Draino. This was on oh, I I
cut out the date. I think this was
day before yesterday.
Shooting at Crosspointe Church in Maine. He says,
the shooter drove a truck in the church
before opening fire. Can you and he goes,
have the Iranian sleeper cells already been activated?
Now he probably deleted that because somebody who
who actually believes in him
was just saying, hey, man. That's wildly irresponsible.
Like, you don't know anything about this. You're
just guessing blindly into the wind about something
you have no idea about based on something
we can't even prove is real. Certainly could
be, but that's because that's what people do
when they're trying to progress a government agenda.
They this is what they need from you.
They want you to be scared about this
for Israel, for whatever they're about to accomplish,
or just to rationalize regime change in Iran.
That's what I think anyway, but I think
it's very telling that he deleted that tweet
now.
I'll include the show and everything else. You
can look at it for yourself. Link included.
Now this guy, who by the way was,
you know, spectacularly
wrong about previous things we discussed
or trying to lie, Horror at French music
festival over a 100 stabbed with syringes and
coordinated attack. I'm only mentioning that just to
think about where this goes, whether this is
sort of a coordinated manipulation.
Now I I'm just saying as possible.
This appears to be something that happened. Here's
the report.
Arrest in France after scorers report
being attacked with syringes at street music festival.
June.
Now based on what I what I've looked
into,
it doesn't there's no indication it's connected to
anything.
But, of course, it could be. But you'll
find people patching together all over the you
know, and here's why.
The same day,
mind you, when this came out, they were
saying, Iran used drug traffickers to stoke trouble
in France.
And then you get another story in France
about people stabbing people's syringes. Like, to me,
that feels a little bit close. Or maybe
it's just a random thing that has no
tie to anything else.
That's what we have to be objective about
this. But my point is there are people
out there in the partisan field who are
already making this into an Iranian sabotage. Iranian,
you know, or even more worrisome, which I
don't wanna get into because I don't wanna
jump the gun on this, which we've all
been worried about where it's gonna come from.
The whole overlap of all this. Some biological
thing that they blame on Iran, then it
gets used to sweep us back into some
vaccine scheme.
I'm really I I I mean, it just
makes so much sense why they would try
that play that card. That's and I've I've
seen the the trappings and everything begin in
that direction for a long time, but just
wanna point that out. I thought that was
an interesting overlap. And so you're getting people
reporting this in in interesting ways.
Here and now that's the one from
just the day before. Now here, Max Blumenthal
Blumenthal points to the New York mayor.
The phony bipartisan narrative of Iran's sleeper cells
is designed to justify imperial wars and entrenched
security state control. He says, remember, between 2001
and 02/2013,
over a 150
terror plots were conceived
by the FBI,
which paid 15,000
plus informants
according to researcher Trevor Aronson.
Now this we've talked about there's a whole
bunch of angle to take this in. One
is specifically how the FBI manufacturers its plots.
And I think
I could get one to come up really
quickly. I didn't grab anything for this, but
let me see if this one comes up.
Yeah. Look at that. There's one of them.
And this is one of our past shows
where we actually discussed this in particular. Oh,
wait. This is the wrong one. Same discussion.
It was Orlando, but there was anyway, I'll
I'll close this as I brought it up.
That one maybe? The point is that on
the the intercept as well,
that an entire article about this time yeah.
It's not the one either. So but see,
we've covered all this stuff going back a
long way, by the way.
The point
is that even the f the f the
intercept even the New York Times did an
article a while back showing you how basically
the FBI would manufacture
or if you wanna be more specific about
it,
rightly so,
drive into possible reality and event under the
guys that, well, they wouldn't if they're not
criminals, then why would they be involved? But
providing the material, providing the car, providing the
money,
coaxing them into doing the thing that they
manufactured.
And or here actually, here's what I'll grab.
This is one this is one of the
best ones.
And this is this is actually, of the,
the free thought project.
And this is a shocking story if you
never read this. Parents catch FBI, literally catch
them in a plot to force their mentally
ill son to be a right wing terrorist.
The kid just wanted a friend.
He was slow,
mentally challenged, and the the FBI were, like,
over a process of months trying to coax
him into carrying out this attack. And
and and basically, the in many of these
cases, the people at the end just end
up going, no. I don't wanna do that.
And because they just wanted to be friends,
they were saying yes to whatever they did
because they just want someone in their life.
And then if and they say no, and
they charge them at the end anyway. Even
though they didn't do the thing and every
other part of it involved the FBI, that's
what we deal with. And so in this
case, what he's highlighting in this is that
many of these things they pointed to were
basically plots conceived by the FBI. And on
top of that, they paid all these informants
to basically get information that they then cycle
back to the media that confirms their own
information. They've done this forever.
So all that's to add to the idea
that maybe we shouldn't blindly take at face
value exactly what suits the narrative for the
current administration,
Iran's sleeper cells.
So Terrell Hudak adds to this, and she
says, it's the same story all over again.
The Iran sleeper cell attack, let's pray this
there isn't a false flag, into parenthesis, says
would be used the same way as nine
eleven attacks. Nine eleven attacks justify the Patriot
Act plus Iraq war. The, quote, Iran sleeper
cell attack would be used to justify digital
ID surveillance, state control, grid, Iran war.
She sees it.
Ellen McLeod points to CNN, which I think
is funny how you got this meshing of
the left right paradigm when it comes to
war every single time, which even the par
even like the the partisan sides of it
or rather the, you know,
whatever you wanna call the mains, the new
mainstream alternative media angle of it all. Right?
So they see themselves as totally against the
Democrats and, you know, even though the woke
left, woke right are basically the same thing.
And now they're the ones pointing to this
and hyping the idea, and then you got
the CNN side doing the same thing. Around
sleeper cell warnings,
And Alan McLeod just goes further to the
reminder, the guy, Wolf Blitzer, literally used to
work for APAC
because that matters.
Now here is a very interesting development. Thank
you to Orwell for pointing this out.
You know this. We've talked about this. I
brought this up many times over the years.
We covered this story
on 01/28/2024.
Suspected terrorist at Texas border works for Mossad.
In fact, let me grab I I closed
this, but I do wanna bring this back
up now, actually.
And I'll I'll show this at the end
just for when this comes into play.
I'll leave it right there.
And it's about the manipulation on the board.
That was the article here that that basically
whatever this was the hype around the border
of Texas and and now the they were
all there with the white the razors and
the water and and the guy drove down
the road. That's right there. I was just
showing you. Literally drove down the road.
And the gate was swinging open
right down the road. And this is a
Republican
right there. And he's simply saying, don't fall
for the border slab, guys. Like, now that
all the standoff between the Texas governor, what's
going on? And the Democrats. And right down
the road, one of the gates was swinging
open. There's nobody there.
I mean, it's just we're being manipulated, and
all that was to drive in the eye.
And at that time was when this happened.
So the point is this was a guy
who worked for Mossad, and the partisan media
wrangled up this whole story and used a
somebody who is not this person. In fact,
you can easily prove it's not the one
they claim it is, who they claim at
the time, they claimed it was a Palestinian
from Azerbaijan
that did tie it back to Iran. It's
the same thing they're using now today.
You could prove the guy they're pointing to
is an old man right now.
So let let me make the case for
you again. But first,
you get this. Iranian national that was let
into the country under Biden says, soon you
will know who I am. See how funny
it is? The narrative just kind of fluctuates
into whatever they currently wanted us today. Now
does that mean the Patriot Oasis
cares,
did their own due diligence, or did they
just blindly follow what somebody else said? 258,000
followers. The point is they're wrong.
But you see, my my question is, do
you think they just stumbled across this story
and did their due diligence? I mean, they
couldn't have because they're wrong.
So somebody set this in front of them
and said, use this now. That's what I
think. Or they just, in their own accord,
decided to pick up a story and lie
about it. But we covered this in January
2024.
When the same grifters told you he was
a Palestinian,
he was a proven he has a proven
record of working for Assad. And after I
revealed that at the time around the Texas
conversation,
they just stopped talking about it.
I wonder why.
It says now they use this again to
claim he's from Iran for the narrative.
So here's the point.
Oh, and here here's a oh, sorry. I
just I forgot to close that. I just
wanna see if they anybody's responded to that.
So, of course, I don't get to see
the responses because that's how Twitter works even
though there is one. But
here,
all the links included. So first, here's the
video where you could hear him. I'm not
you could I'll I'll include it for you.
Just where he says, a Jordanian citizen from
Palestine,
which is relevant. You'll see why. But so
they at the time,
they wanted you to think it was from
Palestine. Now ask yourself why.
Because clearly, that was the current focus. And
they wanted you to think Hamas was sneaking
in. Because that's what Trump and Netanyahu told
you. And it was a blatant lie.
So if we right there, that proof that
shows you that we're being manipulated.
Especially since they're using the same video now
to claim it's a different thing about Iran.
So really, they're just using this. Because if
you have a Mossad agent going into the
country, you could use it however you
like. Now here,
Liam Cosgrove, who you know,
says the Middle Easterner filmed at the border
is not the person they're claiming it was.
Mav Sam Samadov.
Now just to show you, even right now,
you search that and it's just a nonstop
list of people claiming that's who this guy
is.
Saying, so Democrats want Islamic terrorists in our
country. This is, Mav Sam
He's a leader of the Islamic terrorist group
of Azerbaijani
Islamic party and serves twelve year, and you
could tie it back to Iran, all these
different it's not who he is.
That's the point. We'll come we'll show you
right now. But the point is just this
is a lot of this is right now.
All of a sudden, this massive surge of
people reasserting.
Like, this is my point, guys. You have
to recognize that somebody
triggered this. Somebody grabbed this old story and
threw it in front of everybody and said,
that's an Iranian. And everyone just ran with
it because it works for their narratives.
So here was Liam says, that's not who
it is. And I'll show you can prove
it. Very easy. Look at the image that's
gone viral. That's this one here.
This one, that guy right there on the
board, the left side.
And compare that to this article about the
real
Samadov
that was published on the day of his
release from prison, one year prior to the
video. That's this guy.
That's who it is. And you can even
tell by the mole on his face, which
is what they're showing you right there. That's
the mole on his face. Now, look at
the mole on this guy.
Or where's the the good shot of it?
It's right here.
Or where was it? I mean, we're trying
to look for the best shot.
I just I had one pause and I
should I'm oh, there there oh, which one
was it? Hey. I'm I'm just I'm gonna
come back to it. We'll we'll show you
as we play through it. The point is
if you watch this, you don't see a
mole on this guy's face. That's the main
point. But there's a shot that we have
of the other guy
that does show it from a long time
ago. Right? So the point is they're claiming
that this guy
is rather rather this guy is the guy
they're claiming the I forget his name.
Mavsom Samadov.
Okay? But the easy thing to immediately point
out is that this is the guy and
he's old. So clearly, that's not that guy.
Okay? That's easy to prove in the first
place. But what's interesting is what the other
guy how do we what's the other guy?
Right? Who is the guy if it's not
who they're claiming, and why are they making
it out to be him? They're making it
out to be him because he has connection
to things they can claim are Islamic terrorism.
Now it says,
his YouTube channel also shows the same mole
on his left cheek as depicted in the
article profile.
So, again, that proved the guy does not
have a mole in the picture, and the
guy is old in the per the name
they're using. I mean, that's just basic information.
The border clip is alarming,
and sharing this bogus theory only prolongs the
time which John Doe remains identified.
You see, that's the point. When it turned
out we did find out who he was,
which we'll show you next, nobody cared because
he connected to Mossad. It says plea so
what Liam is saying is simply that you
guys are lying about who he is
when your claim is you're worried about this
guy coming into the country. And clearly, you
don't care that he's there because you don't
care to find out who he actually is.
Only the narrative.
Now here, shout out to this Francisco, points
out he's a Jordanian engineer named Bashar Abu
Saeed, who was imprisoned in Egypt for recruiting
for Mossad, which there's a lot of evidence
about this.
And, again, all of this is included in
the show, which watch. I'm just skimming through
it right now to make the point.
Egypt sentences Jordanian engineer to ten years in
at jail for espionage.
Egypt's state security court on Wednesday sentenced a
Jordanian telecommunications
engineer who ten years in prison on charges
of espionage for Israel according to Egyptian media,
who, by the way, at the time, also
confirmed that's who we were talking about. The
court also handed a life sentence in absentia
to an Israeli Mossad agent that the Jordanian
engineer,
Bashar Bashar Abu Zaid, is accused of cooperating
with.
So and you can very clearly see that
this is the same person.
Right? But this is ten years ago. Right?
So the bottom line is there's no mole.
That's the same guy, and you can easily
prove that 15 times over what we did
in the show, and and the person they're
pointing to is clearly old, is not the
same guy.
And so when you do your due diligence
on the guy we're discussing, he is a
at the very least, works for Assad.
And so now, going back to the point,
isn't it interesting that you've got Republicans repurposing
that same thing and saying, look. He says,
soon you will know who I am.
And they they tried to use it to
make it a Palestinian. Now they're trying to
use it to make it Iran.
It's just this it guys, this is a
base it gets so easy to call this
stuff out. Now, again, the point was at
the time of the article,
the whole idea was they were sneaking in
through the border, and it was this whole
big thing. That was also manufactured.
Not that there is an immigration issue. That's
being manufactured by both sides, including Israel, by
the way. But, again, the point of this
episode was to show you that clearly that
was a lie too. So they basically manufactured
this this border situation to probably sneak people
in for all we know. It's exactly what
Republicans are fight they think they're fighting, and
they're the ones allowing it.
So all that to be said, as we're
being lied to yet again about a Mossad
agent to see which none of you probably
can seem to care about, I think it's
very telling the way that this is being
promoted.
My point from before
about how people like this will say,
DHS warns Americans to brace for sleeper attacks.
And then if you listen to the actual
coverage,
it's not as it's
it is promoting it while trying to sort
of walk it back. I'll I'll show you
what I mean in a minute. And one
very telling thing about Israel, but then he
goes, this is the perfect setup for a
false flag domestic terror attack to be blamed
on Iran.
So they go, see? He sees it. Except
in this very clip, he makes the case
that this is real, that Iran is doing
this, but it's simply gonna allow them to
lie about it and frame them anyway.
See, that's an important distinction because the idea
is he's he wants you to believe and
be scared of Iranian sleeper cells that I
don't believe is actually really the case. Again,
wouldn't dismiss it if you have the evidence
for the possibility of it, but there's no
evidence, so I don't think that's really what's
happening.
So when you hear this clip, he's gonna
make the case that it is real. But
because Iran is actually threatening that, which is
what he's saying, that Israel's gonna fake it
and blame it on them.
Why I mean, think about the utter lack
of logic to that. If you think they're
gonna do it, why won't you just let
them do it and blame them for what
they did? Why would Israel need to fake
it to blame them for something that you
just told us they're gonna do? But that
is the that is the the info worth
logic we get.
So my point is to make that case
then one point after this.
Has also directed its proxy group. So it
starts with this other guy he's listening. The
the this guy reads off all the clips
from the mainstream and all the all of
it completely serious and real. Oh, Iranians are
in the country, and they're gonna attack us,
and and then he cuts in.
Just to be clear, it starts with a
minute of full
promoting the narrative.
That matters. Specific locations, just the entire state
of New York. Then we got American military
intelligence saying
that Iran reached out to the White House
Right. And said,
we may hit you
on your domestic soil. Right. So Ron said,
hey. We've got secrets we're gonna use because
that's not the stupidest thing in the world.
DHS issues national terrorism advisory system bulletin warning
of terror attacks amid U I mean, look
at the headline. That's Infowars. DHS issues national
terrorism advisory system bulletin warning of terror attacks
amid USA joining Israel run conflict. Borders are
home and concerned about sleeper cells.
Look it up. The article is not going,
that's a lie. I'll trick you.
Like, this is how they play this game,
and they will act like they're the ones
seeing through it because they know you're not
stupid. They know you all see it, but
they're working for somebody else. That's my opinion.
But look at the constant constant
track record.
Iran conflict as borders are.
There's an imminent
we're told there's an imminent
Iranian counter strike
on US assets
in the Middle East, and the Iranian government
said or in our country.
No worries. Right there, he just very clearly
made the case that Iran said that, which
does not seem to be real to me.
Tying themselves up for
the deep state and the neocons
and the Israelis
What? And their handiwork, like, nine eleven. He's
he's trying so hard to make you think
that he get he sees it. He's calling
out Israel. He's really not.
Attacking to then blame it on Iran.
Okay.
I really want you to think about how
stupid this is.
So what he just said is that Iran
said they're going to attack,
and that the Israel and deep state groups
are gonna take advantage of that
and fake that.
Okay.
So why would they need to fake Iran
attacking The United States if you just told
us that's what they are going to do?
Why wouldn't you just let them do it?
And then I mean, look. You have to
understand. The logic behind a false flag is
to make it look like they did the
thing because they won't do that or they
didn't do that.
Not that you know they're going to, so
you jump ahead and fake it first. Why
would you do that? Why would you give
the opportunity to be exposed for faking it
when you already think they're gonna do it?
It? Guys, this is nonsensical,
but this is what I'm trying to show
you. This matters.
Iran
conflict
that Iran reached out to the White House
and said,
we may hit you
on your domestic soil. DHS
issues national terrorism advisory system, bulletin warning of
terror attacks in US going Israel
Iran conflict. So supporters are
Iranian
Iranian counter strike
on US assets
in The Middle East and the Iranian government
said or in our country. Mhmm.
Tying themselves up for
the deep state and the neocons
and the Israelis
and their handiwork, like 911.
Right. Oh oh, he gets it. He called
911 out. Oh my god. He sees it.
You're you're you're a couple decades late there,
bud. Attacking to then blame it on Iran.
Okay. So Iran is really walking into
a trap. Then we got
How but you so if they're going to
do it, why would that be a trap?
Like so, basically, what you're saying is Israel's
gonna do what they want for them first?
Why wouldn't they go good? That's what we're
gonna do. Why would that be why is
that a trap or a trick if they
both want that? It doesn't make any sense.
God. It's infuriating how silly this all is.
American military intelligence
saying
that Iran reached out to the White House
and said,
we may hit you This is just for
playing a on your domestic soil.
The Bulletin warning of terror attacks are.
We've got a clip here on the list
I wanna play in a minute of,
corporate news reporting on the sleeper cells
all
breathlessly.
Oh, yeah. You mean the thing that you
just admitted was real? But but but they're
gonna take advantage of and fake first before
they can do it. So why would it
be breathless report? You're all doing the same
thing. Like, this guy just it's so inherently
dishonest.
Like, he my point is from my perspective,
he knows what he's doing. He's playing it
across the field. Though many people fall for
this stuff. And so you get you get
basically accidentally accepted that's really what's going on.
So then you're in fear of that thing.
But then act like he somehow saw through
it all the whole time when all he
really did was play you right into the
exact position of what they wanted from square
one.
Then I've got a clip while we're waiting
for the missiles to hit.
Trump running for office
nine
years ago
plus,
and boy, was it a different Trump
on war?
Yeah. Yeah. That same old thing. But then
he goes on to support everything he does
and ends with, go what? I still support
him, and he fights for us, and he's
America first. So it's hollow criticism to go
back and say the same things we're all
highlighting, that Trump has been or gabbered or
the rest. We're saying this, now they're saying
that. Are you ever gonna get into why
that might be the case? You know? And
maybe who's funding them to do it? Of
course not.
But going forward for that same point. Right?
So he wants you to think we're downplaying
this because we don't fall for the corporate
lies and stuff, except we did every time
before it though. Americans fear that deep state
will activate terror sleeper cells if Trump wins.
Well, he did win. Did that happen? Oh,
no. No. It didn't. Okay.
Oh, Americans fear. I mean, watch it for
yourself. The whole hype is about the fact
that the deep state Democrats are gonna do
the thing that, you know, that you're now
acting like they're going like, the the overlap
is insane.
This is him hyping the thing that was
a government argument to tell you that there's
a secret thing that's gonna happen if we
don't allow it. It. It's it's and it
goes on and on and on. This is
the same thing from the Russia overlap.
Gladio two point o is what you're witnessing.
Jack Posobie predicted this on my show last
month because they all they predict everything all
the time. Right? You say everything once, then
you get something right at some point. This
is only the start if Trump wins. The
deep state is preparing to hit with The
US with armies of sleeper cells that have
been brought brought in over the last three
years. Right. Because it's Biden that did
it. You know, the same guy that was
senile and couldn't think through his own shoelaces,
but somehow he planned this all through. But,
oh, the deep state,
it's abstract. But the point is
the sleeper cells that have always been there.
Now was it is it Russia doing it?
Or the deep state and the democrats? Or
now was it Israel or Iran? Which or
are they all there simultaneously?
Certainly possible. But you just get the kind
of fluctuating abstract nature of this. It is
whatever they need it to be when they
want you scared.
Foreign military sleeper cells are covert part of
the NGO multi front invasion program.
Okay. So one thing I didn't point out.
Didn't he just say that Israel
is going to do it first?
So deep state Israel are go okay. So
did he just admit that Israel is the
deep state?
I mean, basically, by deductive logic, that's what
he just said. But, of course, he'll never
make the argument because they're literally working for
Israel, all of them whether they realize it
or not. But if you think the deep
state has these sleeper cells and then you
just recently said that Israel might jump ahead
and do that to blame it on them,
then you're admitting exactly what we all should
see right now.
Foreign military sleeper cells are part of the
NGO multi front invasion program.
The and this was all this that was
all twenty twenty four, twenty twenty five. Top
general warns Ukraine's massive drone attack inside Russia
lays bare The US vulnerability to fifth generation
warfare
as if they're not completely wound in to
the whole damn thing that's happening here. Or
the drone point that I wanna make a
comment on as well.
Jones says, Alex Jones does it again.
How is Jones the only major figure to
accurately predict that Trump strikes on Iran would
happen this Saturday evening? I guess I guess
a post from Seymour Hersh, which is where
you actually got it from, which everybody's highlighted
and everyone talked about. They understand the timing
literally proved that Seymour Hersh put this out,
telling you that The US was going to
bomb the day before.
And then he wants you to think that
after that, when he reported what Seymour Hersh
put out that everybody else already saw, that
he was the only one anywhere that said
that because that's how dumb this all is.
And all the people that blindly follow only
him will go on screaming that for the
next fifty years. The point is, as Adam
rightly points out, Adam Green, he goes, you
claimed you were right when you predicted Trump
cut off Netanyahu.
Yep. For another 75 things we could list
off for the last thirteen days. The bottom
line is that's not true. And it wasn't
like we think that's what's happening. It was
absolutely we knew it, we predicted it, we
knew that's it, and then it didn't happen.
And there was never a follow-up to say,
oh, but I was wrong, or oh, that's
not what the case was, or here's why
it didn't work out. Alex Jones' prediction that
Trump would completely cut ties with Netanyahu
comes true.
Why? Because that's what they wanted you to
think in the lull between these actions because
it worked for Israel.
Now did he know that? It's irrelevant to
me. It's the reality.
He goes, you were dead wrong or deliberately
pushing the psyop.
Now the point
on this is that Seymour Hersh absolutely called
this out.
But overall,
the point is,
remember we talked about the discussion of World
War three and Russia right before all of
this that's
clearly much, much more of an escalation. But
my point at the time was he told
you that because Russia swore that they would
bomb foreign countries if The United States, if
they if if Ukraine did that, which is
not what they actually said, and I proved
that to
you. Ukraine did what it continues to do,
use its munitions from the West to bomb
and attack Russia, which is not new. And,
yes, they did escalate the targets. But in
Russia's mind, this is just what has been
going on. They bombed back and it continued.
My point was, yes, this is a massive
thing. It's not a small thing. But to
argue that one move suddenly pushed into World
War three
was silly.
I didn't there was no reason that one
versus any other the other attacks that happened
all day long. We're getting more of it.
The point
is that the whole thing was about the
actions of Ukraine using the drones. And what
did he say? The neocons are trying to
sabotage. The deep state sabotage Trump's peace plan.
Because, clearly, he's all about peace. Right, guys?
Well, breaking report from the gray zone, leaked
war plans sent out by the United States
National Security Council urged Kyiv to carry out
ISIS style drone attacks on Russian trains and
rail bridges. Oh, you mean exactly what he
was telling the deep state was doing to
sabotage Trump when it turns out to be
Trump's national security council? How crazy is that?
The secret war plans reviewed by Gray zone
foreshadowing a series of deadly Ukrainian attacks on
Russian trains this May and June.
You can read it yourself. It's not hard
to understand. We talked about the Palantir and
the real overlap of the tech and how
it was used. And all of it ties
right back to the current administration, but let's
be clear on top of that. It's not
unique to them either. It's the government. But
he was desperate to make you think that
it was somehow a sabotage of Trump when
they were the ones literally carrying it out.
He will allow you right into a control
structure.
Very, very clear to me.
So all these psyops and efforts are trying
to come in to to trick you into
a very clear position. Now to talk about
what we discussed yesterday and continuing from there,
Israel's illegal Iran war exposes well, this is
from the twenty second. Israel's illegal Iran war
exposes fake America First. That's not to say
that there's not America First that's real, but
the fake ones are being exposed. And the
$800,000,000
Iran attack, which I think is way more
than that. But understand that we're talking about
between that and a billion dollars to bomb
Iran, which we're gonna get to, does not
actually seem like it had an effect.
And this rate of Hormuz, which as far
as I could tell, has not actually been
shut down. I just wanna include that because
that's up in the air still as well.
But there's gonna be a point about that,
and that has to do with the fact
that well, I'll wait to say it when
we get to the tweet, but
they
voted.
You know, the despotic regime voted to about
whether or not that was gonna happen, and
it turns out that it's left up to
the the leader and they haven't done
it. Can you imagine what The US would
do if they were in that position? They'd
they've shut it down every Thursday if they
wanted to.
Now there's some important things I wanna include.
We're not gonna go through it all again,
but to just reset the table for things
we discussed in the last show, which are
very important. One of them, as I said
here, make sure let's see if it's getting
suppressed or not.
Make sure you do your due diligence regarding
Iran.
If you do, you will quickly find out
you have been lied to your entire life.
Exactly like every other nation The US and
Israel, among others, have destroyed for their agenda
while screaming freedom.
It's a great thread by lord b lord
Bebo
that not only shows you the reality of
Iran today and the many different locations in
Tehran where people are walking around. Now, yes,
there are morality laws and there are in
places where it's enforced. But it's it's like
a lot of things in this country where
there's a law that exists, but it's pretty
broadly not enforced. And you can see that
if you ask just about anybody that's been
to Iran or look at the many, many,
many different database. Basically,
most everything shows you that other than narratives
of the US government in Israel or people
with that agenda. It that's the reality.
You could see plenty of women with no
head coverings. You see peep it's it's just
you're being lied to, guys. It's not what
you're being told. And the thread goes on
about a lot of stuff, showing showing the
propaganda, the Iranian women in the country,
many different walk arounds, or or the fact
that there are Jew
there's there's a big Jewish community with synagogues,
active synagogues throughout Iran.
How does that make sense for you with
the way you frame the conversation? That they
just wanna kill all the Jews, but there's
a bunch of synagogues throughout Iran. You're being
lied to, guys.
But look through it for yourself.
My point was to include that, to know
that you're being lied to about the hijab,
about the reality of what's going on. And,
no, there there is a lot of problems
with this government just like there's a lot
of problems with all governments, in my opinion.
That's not the same as
everything you're saying being true.
Now we also talked about Operation Ajax and
the regime change effort that took place in
'53.
And I will include this article we included
with alright. This is a show I did,
but I actually included the the writing we
did at the time.
And it's and I'll also include this one,
which I didn't include last time. Sixty five
years ago today, and this was on 08/1938,
the CIA conspired with UK to overthrow Iran
on behalf of big oil, Operation Ajax.
And on that note, here's a quick clip
just to show you how much this is
now evolving. This is current news in The
UK. Or it was, yeah, good morning Britain.
Lesson what they had to say. This at
one point, this was, like, as crazy as
saying the Israeli government is bombing, you know,
or just anything that we used to be
lied to about. It just was, you shall
not say that. Israel, you can't argue they're
violating the law anywhere. Now we're all having
the conversation.
Well, that's the same thing for this, and
now it's changing.
US
have a terrible record in regime change in
Iran in 1953.
MI six and the CIA organized a coup
to topple a democratically
elected president Mosaddegh and replace him with the
Shah. Now the Shah is just Remember, Mosaddegh
was very, very much and publicly and provably
with his track record aiming in the direction
of a western democratic direction.
He he he you can read about it.
He he had pictures next to the Liberty
Bell. He was he really was trying to
emulate something that he saw as a democratic
society,
and they didn't want that. That's the same
reason they don't want that in Haiti or
Saudi Arabia because they use positions like that.
They don't care about freedom. They care about
using the r d the idea to manipulate
everybody. It's a nice nice term for warlord.
They were very authoritarian,
the Shahs.
So
Iran has never had trying to have regime
change in The UK or The US, but
The U UK and The US have, imposed
regime change in the past in Iran, and
it didn't it didn't end well again. It
did.
Yep. Nothing new. But I'm just glad to
see people finally being honest about it.
And Astrin Ratzani says a rare minute of
truth in Britain television.
And here is a here's a clip of
him speaking who was it again?
Oh, the it's
doctor Dmitry Trenin,
member of the Russian Foreign Defense
Policy Council. The goal of regime change in
Iran to collapse the government and replace it
with pro western regime is a fantasy pushed
by Israeli officials.
So what's going on?
Now,
overlapping this with what Thomas Matthew was saying,
he puts the tweet out that says and
this is actually really irrelevant to think about.
So Mike Johnson, speaker Johnson says, the president
made the call, the right call,
and did what we he needed to do.
Leaders in congress were aware of the urgency
of the situation, basically saying that Donald Trump
let them know what was going on,
but not everybody else.
Literally, the congress that's supposed to be the
one that authorizes these actions. So Thomas Massie
rightly says, why didn't you call us back
from vacation to vote on military action if
there was a serious threat to our country?
And this is what this person wrote. Not
familiar.
Dear Thomas Massie, presidents who bombed without approval
and lists off all the presidents and says
sincerely history. I don't think you realize what
point you think you're making here. Is your
argument that because it happened before, therefore, we
shouldn't call it out now? Would you call
it out if it was Biden?
You know what I mean? It it's just
insane to people that think because,
like, the I like, yes. I agree. Let's
make that clear. And I've made this case
before. It's the same as everything else we're
talking about. Just because they didn't enforce it
then does not mean we ignore it now
because it's not politically convenient for you. It's
actually wildly naive. In fact, it seems self
sabotaging.
But it's because that is team sport politics,
guys. That's not about facts or what you
believe in or principles. It's about sides.
But you're attacking my side, and they did
it first. It's like it's kindergarten level argument,
guys. And Carrie rightly calls it out and
says, dear Thomas Massie, Trump is in the
same boat as all the other warmongering authoritarian
presidents before him. I believe that's a good
argument in favor of Trump.
But, you know, I don't think that she
realizes how stupid that looks to, like, the
Angela person to say
that he's do you that the one you
claim is saving us is doing the thing
they all did.
Okay. So you're making our case for us.
It's no different. And, yes, all of them,
including this one, were required to have congressional
approval. So you just admitted they all wrote
the law. Well, currently, there's only one in
front of us who's actively doing it, so
let's deal with that. No. They'll run from
that. Because they don't want to hold them
accountable. They want to pretend like it's okay
what he's doing because they are on a
team.
Glenn Greenwald
points out what Marjorie Taylor Greene said. Now
to be clear, I don't something I just
very clearly do not think she's being I
I don't take her at face value. I
don't think any of them face value, but
there's something about the way she's doing this
that feels very grifty, very,
you know,
what do they call it? Fair weather. Whether
she's going along with who whatever the direction
seems to most benefit her, which is what
I think of all of them. So I
don't even think it's that that abnormal, but
there's something about specifically her doing this that
I think stands out to me. But like
I always say, that's why we're pointing to
it.
Even if I know she's being dishonest, which
I'm not saying I do, but even if
I didn't know that, I would still point
to it because it's correct, at least in
the in the broad sense. And point to
it to say, well, let's motivate other people
to also say this whether they believe it
or not because it's the truth.
Which is I spent millions of my own
money and traveled the entire country campaigning for
Trump and his MAGA agenda and his promises.
And Trump MAGA agenda included these key promises.
No more foreign wars,
no more regime change,
World peace.
And this is what the people voted for.
Only six months in, and we are back
into foreign wars, regime change, and World War
three. Oh, and, you know, Stargate platforms, MR
and A, MMR, and all that stuff too.
It feels like a complete bait and switch
to plea to please the neocons or Israel,
which she won't say.
Warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neo con
key personalities at MAGA hates
who were never Trumpers.
Exactly.
Because what you're seeing is that they played
you with what they know you wanted to
hear, which is just politics.
After the bombs were dropped, we were told
complete success, and Iran's nuclear capabilities were totally
wiped out.
Then it quickly turned into Iran's nuclear facilities
partially damaged, and now it's we don't know
where their enrichment is at because that was
the way it was supposed to go, guys.
I'm that's I that's very clearly what I
think.
She's just let me be clear. My children
are 22, 25, and 27. I will literally
fight anyone for their future.
And their future and their entire generation's future
must be free of America last foreign wars
that provide terrorist attacks on our homeland, military
drafts, nuclear war. Like, even the way she's
doing that, like, I get the sense that
she's playing an angle to all of this
that's meant to counterbalance
where this all goes. That's my gut. But
it says I am fighting for them to
have a future where they can afford to
buy a home, afford insurance, investment, retirement, blah
blah blah, and they can have their own
tax payer funding government destroy it all. Contrary
to brainwashed Democrat boomers think and protest about,
Trump is not a king. MAGA is not
a cult, and I can do and have
my own opinion. Well, see, that's not that's
a very dishonest argument. There's I'm sure some
of them are broad stroking the whole thing,
but the point is
what you're calling out, Marjorie, is making the
case of why they say that. Doesn't that
I mean, see, that's a lot of reasons
why I don't feel this rings true. But
regardless,
I'm glad, as Glenn points out, that people
are calling it out. Even if it's because
they see that we're all seeing through it,
and that's a way to, you know, release
some steam. But it says people rightfully denounce
things like the audience capture and politicians who
have no principles, who won't criticize their party
leaders.
Marjorie Taylor Greene's political identity has been built
on MAGA and Trump, yet she's vocally defending
her principles even if it means criticizing him.
Yeah. You know my opinion, but still worth
calling out.
Massey says our war powers resolution has 57
cosponsors. As I understand that it's, like, very
few Republicans. Whether you like it or not,
congress will be voting on US hostilities in
Iran. Great.
Under the war powers act, he says the
president is required to withdraw from hostilities in
Iran within sixty days, which, again, my point
is that's why that's even the first place
is because they gave him that loophole through
the War Powers Act, which is frustrating. Thing
is that we already know based on the
constitution that it's not that it's Congress's authority
to declare war, but here we are. And
on top of that, I don't think it
applies in the first place. I went through
the War Powers Act yesterday.
I don't think it applies with where they
currently are for the metrics I covered yesterday,
unless he gets a vote of Congress.
Now, to finish the statement, saying basically, under
this, he's required to do that unless congress
allows us to continue.
Which as I understand that he was already
supposed to present something within the first two
two days.
I don't think he's done that.
But this is just hilarious to me. So
because Massey is simply calling out what he
believes is wrong, that Trump then takes a
personal attack because that's how Paul partisans see
everything
as a side as opposed to principle.
This joke from the Babylon Bee is just
spot on. Trump announces he has evidence Thomas
Massie is only weeks away from requiring nuclear
weapons. Oh, that's so perfect.
It's just like I fell out of my
chair. I mean, it just it's perfect. It's
just exactly it cuts through all the bulls
because you can see I well, I think
this is trying to make the case that
they'll lie about anything if it suits their
current direction.
Now I'll include this. Now all these, again,
were to highlight the different things I think
are relevant. One of them was Thomas Massie
and the different bills and where it's going
and pushing back through congress. So, again, I'm
still just kinda showing you stuff that's relevant
to the last conversation. This one, I won't
play again, but this is Scott Horton breaking
down very succinctly and very eloquently with all
the facts that Iran is not seeking a
weapon. And based on everything, including what Tulsi
Gabbard said, including what the International Atomic Energy
Agency said, everything other than what Israel's telling
Trump,
which they've lied about their entire lifespan,
they're not doing this. But watch it for
yourself.
And on this one, I think is interesting.
So on the same point,
this is from yesterday. Trump warrants his own
team
live on Fox News after they fact check
his Iranian nuclear claims. The simple point on
this is that you need to tow the
line no matter what.
So if you wanna go, but but but
Trump, I have evidence to suggest that's not
the case. He doesn't wanna hear it. I
don't want I don't wanna know. I I
have a narrative. This is our agenda. You
shut up and tow the line. Is that
what you voted for? I thought you I
thought the whole point was Trump would surround
himself with the people that knew what they
were talking about. Wasn't that the day one
narrative?
Because I don't know everything, but they all
know. But, no, he's showing, I don't wanna
hear it. I don't want you to tell
me I I'd Tulsi Gabbard says that's not
the case. He goes, I don't care what
she says. It's just it's it couldn't be
more clear. Now Sarah Abdallah post this from
professor Morandi saying the real issue for The
US was never a bomb. It was always
about Palestine.
As I said earlier,
the real issue is not Iran's nuclear program.
The real issue for The United States is
Iran's support for the Palestinian people.
That is it.
Have no doubt that the nuclear program is
nothing but an excuse.
Have no doubt that Iran's missile program or
its drone program,
all of these are just excuses.
What The United States wants is
supremacy
for the Zionist regime,
and that is why it's putting pressure on
Iran. So why do you think The United
States wants to include
regional issues alongside the negotiations with the nuclear
program?
Because they want to draw concessions from Iran
in order
to give concessions on the nuclear program. It
it wants to Iran to end its support
for Palestine.
It wants Iran to be something like Turkey,
where you host some Palestinians
and you condemn Israel on television,
but you do business and trade and you
have
political relations with the with the country, or
The Emirates, or Egypt, or,
Jordan, or or Morocco,
or it it doesn't matter. What they want
is Iran to change its position like Qatar.
Say,
criticize the Israeli regime, but at the end
of the day, do nothing
in reality to oppose its hegemony
and domination.
Fake resistance is the point, and that's everywhere.
Iranian won't do that. Iran is not going
to
trade
its, support for the Palestinian people so that
The United States will be more flexible with
regards to sanctions
and Iran's peaceful nuclear program. So that is
why Iran won't separate the issues because the
issue for The United States is not the
nuclear program. The issue for The United States
is Palestine.
I really do believe that. I think that
they're like, at least one of the major
parts of all this because, I mean, look,
it's about Israel, guys. That's what this comes
back to. It's history makes itself very clear.
It's all right in front of you.
Caitlin Johnstone adds to the point about Iran
that simply says the top 10 dumbest things
we're being asked to believe about Iran.
One, that the Iranians want to be the
way they want to be bombed, which that's
the argument saying that, you know, they want
The US to step in and bomb them
because their government's bad. It's it's just not
true. And there's nothing other than the fake
activists they show you that live in other
countries they want you to think makes sense.
Says the guy bombing Iran wants peace. Trump.
It's ridiculous.
That regime change interventionism is a swell idea
this time, that anyone who doesn't want war
with Iran hates Jews. That this time, the
government and the media are telling us the
truth about an American war. And that this
time, the neocons are smart and correct. We'll
play that one in a second.
That bombing Iran makes it less likely to
try to obtain nukes.
This is silly. It's exact opposite, in fact.
The the the Iran is trying to assassinate
the US president when all US presidents have
the same foreign policy. Exactly. That Iran, a
country that never starts wars, cannot be trusted
with nuclear weapons, but Israel, a country that
starts wars constantly,
can and has them. That attacking Iran benefits
America. I mean, guys, it just this might
I think most Americans would read that and
go, yeah. I mean, it's just basic common
sense. They're just not represented in this fake
conversation.
Ryan Grim says, and this is what I
was mentioning earlier. So The US democracy or
The US, a democracy,
you know, so that is the the point,
the narrative. So a democracy we're told just
attacked Iran without a vote or any input
from congress.
Simultaneously,
Iran, who were told is an authoritarian regime,
literally just held a a debate and a
vote in parliament over whether to block the
Strait Of Hormuz.
I mean, just take a second to reflect
on how obvious that is. You're being lied
to about
everything that suits their agendas. Everything. Even in
ways that are I argue aren't even necessary.
That's insane and very clear.
Now you could argue that, you know, it's
different factors that make that case. You know,
fair fair point. But this just shows you
a very important nuance and, you know, a
dishonesty about what we're framing them as.
Now here's what I was saying before. Let's
play this first. Here's what JD Vance had
to say, and it's the one they were
just which Caitlin was just kinda making fun
of.
The second thing is, Kristen, I I I
certainly empathize
with Americans who are exhausted after twenty five
years of foreign entanglements in The Middle East.
Oh, well, thank you. I'm so glad you
empathize with our frustration of forever wars as
you start more wars. I understand the concern,
but the difference is that back then we
had dumb presidents and now we have a
president who actually knows how to accomplish America's
national security objective.
That's actually the argument.
They were dumb and were smart.
Okay. So do the same things. Now, what's
that old saying? You know, that doing the
same thing, expecting a different result, right?
You know, pretty sure it takes a dumb
person to keep trying the same thing that
you know. Like that because the real point
is they're not trying the same. They're doing
what they've always done for the same reasons
in my opinion. Now the reasons fluctuate and
evolve, but it's the same general direction of
control and influence, and usually for somebody else.
But I just can't get past how like
is I mean, they must real they must
either be themselves that completely
like ignorant,
uneducated,
or they think you're that stupid. They think
that the all day they just go, well,
they were dumb.
And we're
smart. It's gonna somehow go, oh, that's profound.
They clearly get it.
I just they I think they dramatically underestimate
the intelligence of that of average Americans. I
mean, even, like, even if you wanna argue
people that aren't necessarily book smart, for example,
are not necessarily just it takes a childlike
naivety to not see how silly that is.
That's people that are already on your side
that go, yeah. We're the smart ones. Everybody
else is gonna go, really?
That's not an argument. That's not even really
a metric. That's just you claiming you're better.
So this is not gonna be some long
drawn out thing. We've got in, we've done
the job of setting their nuclear program back.
We're gonna now work. Yep, see, they're still
selling the narratives. That's what they were just
pointing out. They accept as Marjorie Keller Green's
already told you, they've already shifted the narrative
because that's what allows them to they got
the the win for, like, a few hours,
then they started to roll it back already
because Israel wanted to continue. Now you can't
claim we ended their program if the whole
point is we need to continue the war.
So they moved it and we don't know
where it is. And now we didn't succeed
and except yet Kegseth and the rest are
still acting like they're this big muscly power
that just that beat everybody with our power.
It's just it's, you know, it's embarrassing when
you really think about it. Because you must
realize that they know Iran knows that's not
true. They know that Israel knows that's not
true. And they know that most of us
know that's not true. And yet they still
put HEGSAT through that humiliation ritual of standing
there acting like they're, we're tough and they
didn't, they were strong enough to fight us
off. Even though otherwise we're gonna get to,
it appears that was an agreement beforehand.
To permanently dismantle that nuclear program
over the coming years, and that is what
the president has set out to do. Oh,
and that's the other point he makes, and
this I'll read right now. It's okay. So
we we understand that you're tired of wars,
and we're gonna do we're gonna get over
we're gonna basically wrap this up and then
says, over the next so many years, we're
gonna finish this off. Oh, okay. So at
minimum, a couple of years of more war?
Pretty sure you don't understand, Vance, or at
least you're pushing in the narrative that you
know you're supposed to. As Aaron says, in
one breath, JD Vance assumes assures Americans,
exhausted after twenty five years of it's way
more than that, by the way, of US
Mid East conflict that this is not going
to be some long drawn out thing because,
quote, we've done the job.
And the next, he immediately declares that we're
going to now work to permanently dismantle the
program that doesn't exist. But after twenty five
years in Mideast entanglements under the dumb presidents,
how many more years can we now expect,
thanks to the smart ones?
Sounds like he hasn't done the job.
Kurt Megs Metzger points out something we were
just talking about. And it it just doesn't
a very perfect little kind of setup joke
dynamic, which is really important to make you
think about it.
Hey. Remember when North Korea was about to
get nukes?
And it was super scary because they are
in the axis of evil, we were told.
Then they did get nukes and nothing happened
and we stopped talking about it. No. Me
neither.
It's just so silly. I mean, there's so
many parts to add to it. Like, I
just think the sentiment is what's worth thinking
about. You know, we can consider whether there's,
you know I mean, look, people argue that
the whole thing is just a CIA
cutout. I I mean, I find that not
hard to wrap my mind around because of
what happened post the war. But but regardless,
it's worth thinking about the narrative that was
sold to you. Right? Did they claim they're
seeking weapons, which I mean, there is a
point of it that makes it hard. There's
more to that than I think. Like, whether
there's parts that aren't in their control. The
bottom line is the narrative was they were
seeking the weapon. They were the biggest threat
of our democracy.
Then we're told they got it, and then
it just stopped.
So if the whole thing was they have
it now, isn't that more important?
Right? I mean, it just it very clearly
showed you, and this is what a lot
of people have made the case about in
Libya, if you give up your nuclear control,
whether civilian or weapons, you get destroyed.
You get raped in the street by people
that America led to do so. That's what
happened to them. And they they now the
country is a despotic hellhole with multiple warring
tribes that are that's and that's freedom. That's
liberation according to The United States.
So over here, North Korea, they do the
opposite, and then nothing ever happens again. And
I'm when was the last time I even
heard about North Korea?
So they they just prove to you what
should happen. Now it's almost like they want
Iran to seek that out. I think that's
kind of the case.
I don't think it's in their interest at
this point. Even if if they do, they're
just gonna use it as the excuse at
this point. But my point is they already
have the legal right to do if they
want to as well as a civilian program.
But as Peter points out,
who I've oh, yeah. I I forget who
he's where he's from.
Anyway, the point is not about the person,
but he says, to to every liberal
democrat out there who thinks the democrats would
be doing things different than Trump. Go ahead
and watch this. What you I'm not gonna
make you well, it's only seventeen seconds. The
point is simply that
they are on the same team.
Now
the point is not necessary. When we're screening
a two party illusion, you should already understand
that. The point that for people that don't
know that though is that right now, the
left and right are the same thing. It's
a different flavor and the same whether Kamala
or Trump, I'd argue we'd be doing the
same thing. I don't even think we had
an influence over that outcome. But either way,
understand if you're trying to make yourself think
that somehow the other side is not gonna
be better when they finally got into power,
you're falling back into the same old trap.
Could but oh, and the point is the
clip. He's literally, as a Democrat, telling you,
we support Israel to defend itself against Iran.
They're all on the same side.
Glenn Greenwald points to what Massey said,
and he simply says when two countries are
bombing each other
daily in a hot war and a third
country joins the bombing,
that's an act of war.
He says, I'm amazed at the mental gymnastics
being undertaken by neo cons in DC and
their social media bots
to say we're we're not at war. We
just saw Eagle Guntherman, whatever his name is,
do this and we are not at war.
Why? Because that's what he was told to
say.
So they want us to think we're not
at war so they can make war.
But, I mean, it's the same thing about,
like, the World War three point. Like, okay.
So same thing. Like, right now, this is
an escalation from what it was, you know,
months ago. But even before that, I can
go back to Syria before. The metrics we
we you could argue met what we call
World War two have been met many times
since then.
So we're just a different phase of the
world right now. And so we're just really,
a constant state of war is the reality,
but
this is a big escalation.
But there's but they're acting like we're not
at war. I think they just want to
drop that shoe when they want to. But
it's embarrassing. And as Glenn says,
is there only is there one country in
the world other than The US that would
earnestly debate whether dropping 30,000 pound bombs on
another country is an act of war and
means that you're actually at war?
We're so delusional in this country, the people
that are in the partisanship anyway. We fight
so many wars that our standard for what
counts as war has become so diluted.
It's depressing.
Here's what Massey had to say, and I
love the I love the analogy. He says,
three bombings to neutralize Iran, which is what
they want you to think is that's gonna
stop them. Clearly not. And I don't think
they ever even expected that. Three bombings to
neutralize Iran, he says, might be the 2025
version of two weeks to slow the spread.
Same thing regardless of the side. And the
notion that this isn't an act of war,
I find ludicrous. This is a hot war.
There are two nations, Israel and Iran, trading
volleys of missiles
every night, every day, and we're a co
belligerent now in this war.
That's a that's a point that I didn't
make the other day or yesterday.
You have to realize. I'll show you again
as we finish today.
Hundreds of attacks.
Iran or or Israel bombing hundreds of locations
according to them.
And yet, we only get shown a couple
of these these, you know, nuclear locations. Do
you know why? Because they're bombing civilian buildings.
They're bombing all over the country. They're bombing
Tehran.
And they just want you to only isolate
your mind a couple of nuclear buildings that
they said they bombed.
Now we're gonna get to that. But you
realize that they have been bombing government buildings.
They've been bombing scientists. They're just bombing the
country just like they bombed in Gaza,
in Lebanon,
in Syria
because that's what they do. And your blind
government support is allowing this to continue.
I mean, the vice president went on to
say that the they needed to act now
because there was a narrow window. And if
they waited, it could have been too late,
and they needed to stop the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction.
Oh, here we are again. He even used
the WMD, guys. They they just don't have
any like, they just there's they're just lazy,
I guess. They just can't make up a
new story. The truth the truth here, guys,
is you you're tell you're you're saying that
GD Vance,
not a nuclear scientist, not an expert,
saying that they
see the or what what he say how
do you say exactly the
Every day,
the they needed to act now because there
was a narrow window. And if they waited,
it could have been too late, and they
needed to stop the proliferation.
Proliferation. Right? Because he's using it to, like,
nonproliferation treaty.
Well, we're not even again, they're not even
the enrichment level needed to make the material
needed to make the bomb. And we've talked
about this a 100 times over. Right? And
so what he's saying is JD Vance wants
you to think that there was an arrow
window that we said they were gonna do
a thing that everybody else says wasn't wasn't
happening. Both the agencies that do the due
diligence and the person you put there, like,
Tulsi Gabbard says, no. That's not the truth.
But Israel says that and has been caught
lying about it 75 times over, but you
okay. Well, we we have a window. That's
a John Bolton argument, guys. That is a
credible threat that turned out to be nothing
but statements from people that lie. That's who
they are, and that's why Massey is being
hated on because he's simply not calling he's
saying that's not true. I disagree.
How dare you have your own opinion?
Of weapons of mass destruction.
Do you not share that concern?
No. I don't share that concern. I'm also
but I have another concern, and that is
that,
three bombings
to neutralize Iran may turn out to be
the 2025
version of two weeks to slow the spread.
This could turn into a protracted,
prolonged engagement, and I'm here to represent the,
you know, the base of the MAGA, party
that got Trump elected. Mhmm. Most of us
were tired of the wars in The Middle
East and Eastern Europe, and we were promised
that we wouldn't be engaging in another one.
Yet here we see this happening, and there's
a you know, the the president and the
administration say, oh, we're done. We've we've had
our little bombing, and now this is over.
But what happens if this drags on between
Israel and Tel Aviv gets pummeled by Iran?
Is president Trump gonna say we're gonna sit
by and not do anything in that instance?
I just I'm leery of this given everything
that's happened before.
Yeah.
Obviously.
Because he's not a moron. Right? I mean,
it's basic logic, guys. You know as well
as I, and so does everybody else who
supports Trump, that should that happen, that he'll
back Israel. You know why? Because he say
he's taken every opportunity in every moment you've
ever seen to make you hear that. That
we'll back Israel no matter what. We're the
best ally they ever had. We'll support every
possible opportunity.
And yet, let's question whether he'll jump in
to support them when that happens.
Obviously, you know the answer.
They're just trying to drive you into this
to make you think it's your choice. That's
what they do.
Carrie Weather says the warmongers in the US
government have failed to achieve their stated goals
of stopping terrorism and spreading freedom in, checks
notes,
every Middle Eastern country they've ever bombed.
So, obviously, the one thing to do is
bomb another Middle Eastern country.
I love her when she she's just so
perfect. You I mean, what's funny to me
is most people that probably need to hear
that will be insulted by it. But it's
just it's so it just so perfectly, so
eloquently
highlights
the basic contradiction.
You know, the the history of how we
know, as I just said, they're batting zero.
Right? But let's let them go again. Let's
see what happens because we're being led by
dishonest people.
Well, Donald Trump says and now we'll talk
about the bombings and going forward from here.
And it look looks like I've got a
bunch more stuff to cover that was sent
to me, but that's good. Let's let's get
get us caught up at the end here.
And, please, if you're listening, anything else you
wanna send to me that you think is
relevant, please do.
Donald Trump on the twenty first says we
have completed our very successful attack, which what's
funny is instantly they already blocked that back.
But so the narrative in the beginning was
we did it. We stopped them. We killed
everything. They it was complete destruction. They don't
exist anymore. And all the partisan screamers, the
Johnsons and Johnsons, everybody else rushed out and
said, we did it.
Everyone's right, and Trump did it. We told
you. And, everyone from DC Draino, they came
out and they said, like, I'll I'll jump
ahead really quickly.
He says, looks like the people who trusted
Trump were right again.
The guy's like, I genuinely don't know what
you could possibly be referring to. And he
goes, oil prices are falling and there's no
World War three.
Why? Because you pretend that what he said
is the case with this thirty minute window
is suddenly the reality? Like, Israel's still currently
bombing Iran. These guys are blind followers
to the point to where it's embarrassing
that they must know you can see through
them and they are
tied in. We'll come back to that. But
so Trump was saying at the time on
the twenty first, very successful. We bomb these
three different nuclear locations without any concern for
the potential fallout based on what you claim
they are. Right? They're nuclear bomb places, and
we just bomb them though because we don't
care about the fallout despite us
screening about the Russian situation when they were
doing it. Hypocrisy everywhere. The point is they
know these are not those locations. They know
the reality of it, so they're not really
worried about that.
But it says a full payload of bombs
was dropped on primary site Fordo, and then,
you know, and point is they bombed them.
And they claimed it was success. Candace Owens
says a full payload of bombs was dropped,
followed by,
now is the time for peace.
That's how stupid this is.
Utterly deranged.
If we had raised the 100,000,000 Adelson gave
him on GoFundMe,
maybe he would have kept his promises.
Guess we'll never know. The bottom line is
you don't bomb people and then say, now
it's time for peace. They were at the
table when you guys bombed them. That's the
reality.
And by the way, it's the same before
that. They were at the table until Trump
unilaterally pulled out and created the lies that
drove them here. So that's what they said
at the beginning. Why would we deal with
Trump again? And yet they did beginning to
anyway,
and they took advantage again. How many times
do you need to take advantage of by
lying people at a at a negotiating table
before you start going, why am I even
gonna pretend that you're honest? But see, when
they do that, then they turn to the
world and say, see, they don't wanna negotiate.
It's it's just just so tired. So let's
talk about the bombing conversation. So here
is so right now, where we're at in
the conversation is from when Trump claimed they
bombed those sites
and what the information seems to be showing.
Right? Now not what has followed. We'll get
to that in a second. Now this is
on the twenty third. This is today. Trump
says Iran's nuke sites are obliterated.
The military, however, isn't so sure. Now I'll
include this. You can read through it. I
I right now, this is basically
a like, as usual and including what we're
gonna get to when we get to Qatar
and Iran responding,
it's hard to report on this stuff because
it's almost always incorrect. And that's not because,
like, for example, the article is not cleaning,
they know. They're they're saying, here's what Trump
said. Here's what people arguing. That's not the
case said. And right now, we don't really
know for sure. I mean, to some degree,
but satellite imagery and so on. But there's
just it's so often that we're misled by
this stuff. So it's important to take it
with a grain of salt. The point is
they said it was obliterated, that even they
walked that back. But the military was clear,
but it says defense officials say the claims
are overblown.
They're lying to you guys. That's there's a
reason for that.
Fox News today,
Israel attacks or Iran attacks Israel
despite US strikes. So what was the argument?
We're gonna bomb them so bad, they'll never
wanna fight again, which is the same thing
Israel's currently saying, by the way.
But what happened?
What always happens? They responded. And they go,
how dare they, terrorists? Because they responded like
we do every time. It's just lazy.
But they responded, and Trump calls for peace.
But Israel kept bombing. Right? So they did
not get they did not get,
what's the word I'm looking for? Would they
say the, you know, they didn't get restrained
or whatever they're trying to claim they were
doing. That's not what they were doing. Just
making the point that they're just we're being
lied to every time they do that. Now
this was also today.
First, earlier in the day, US reportedly preparing
for imminent Iranian attack of an American base
in Qatar. So I wanna be very clear.
It's very obvious now, which is why it's
always important for me not to just rush
out with what's currently breaking instead of waiting
to understand what's going on. That's what you'll
get from a lot of the partisans is
they'll just take the screenshot and rush out
and give you whatever corporate media is telling
you, which is just it's silly to me.
So waiting to see us develop,
US reportedly preparing for an imminent attack on
a base in Qatar. So the case becomes
that they knew this was gonna happen.
So the first part, it does appear as
we'll touch on again in one second, that
the argument was and even Catherine Austin Fitch
is pointing to this. That there was an
a
an inside track where they basically said, look,
we're gonna bomb these locations,
remove the material.
We'll even remove people from Iraq and from
the cutter base, and you can respond, and
we'll walk this back. Now, I'm not saying
I know for sure that's the case, but
we know that has happened before.
But I'm never able to tell whether that's
The US entities, like, cooler heads prevailing, if
you wanna pretend. It's hard for me to
say about the United States government, but it
could it's certainly possible
versus, you know, like, put the Israel intentions.
I do think want this to continue. So
if I had to guess at it, it
seems like there's elements of this. Maybe Trump,
his administration, made it certainly possible, that didn't
who are wanting this for the same reasons
everybody else, but didn't want this to spin
out because maybe he's losing his base. That
makes sense. So they use their own channels
to walk this back a certain way. Consider
that as we go forward. So first, they
respond on Cutter. Or technically second, because what
I'm talking about is the yesterday show about
the the bait the bombing of the nuclear
locations,
the civilian nuclear locations from his from you
from The US attack, and then whether or
not that was sort of discussed, and that's
why they were able to remove the material,
which does seem to have happened. But, again,
material that would be there regardless of whether
it was a nuclear weapons program.
So then
Iran responds.
Well, technically, we haven't gotten it yet, but
this is them saying that they're ready for
that response.
Then this is from the economic times.
The I think it's the Al Udeid Airbase
in Qatar. And it says, why US is
removing its troops? You see? Just like Iraq.
So they created a situation where they allowed
this to look like they responded, but it
we're gonna get to in a second. Iran
told them that they were gonna bomb here.
US relocates aircraft from the base as is
where that conflict escalates. Clearly, they knew what
was coming, guys. So here is Haritz.
Trump says complete and total ceasefire. Oh, wait.
This is oh, son of a gun.
Stupid, Harrettes. This is the the plot the
thing refreshed on me. This is where we're
gonna get to. That article a second ago
said, they bombed Cutter.
This is so frustrating. Hold on.
Okay. Well, there's regard regardless, the point is
I was just giving you source material to
follow-up on.
We'll come back to that since that's where
we're that's the end point where we're at
even I think we're going beyond that. The
point is that
Iran bombed up the base in Qatar as
well as the argument being some places in
Iraq.
Then the evidence began to flow
that it was discussed beforehand. Now this is
a simultaneous report. That I wasn't gonna get
to that in the Harratz article that disappeared.
Trump calls Iran's response very weak and thanks
Tehran
for advanced notice of the attack because that's
what the rex article said.
That's there's a lot of reports around that.
So why in the world would Iran
tell them
we're going to bomb right there. Right? And
the point unless they wanted this to be
able to be deescalated. That's what's called restraint.
That's what's called not being the the you
know, what The US and Israel do with
everything they ever do. Boiling over the top
and bombing 35 more places. They will bomb
even harder if you push back.
This is what restraint looks like.
And then even though they let them know
he acts like that's their weak response and
they were played,
you know, he's having his cake and eating
it too. You're admitting they told you about
it, but then acting like somehow that still
shows they're weak. They, you're the one being
played in all this and you're still trying
to pound your chest and act like you're
in control. I I find that to be
insulting.
This is a report from court, I think
this is, Guardian.
Iran coordinated the attacks, and this is just
a report, on the American air base in
Qatar with Qatari officials and gave advanced notice
to the attacks that they were coming to
minimize casualties.
You see my point? So they major apparently,
there was no casualties. And this is according
to three Iranian officials.
And now that Trump has basically admitted that,
the official said Iran symbolically
needed to strike back. That's exactly what we
were talking about. But at the same time,
carry out in a way that allowed all
sides to exit ramp. I mean, like, verbatim
what we said would happen. But, again, it's
not this if if you are even the
smallest student of this, if you're watching this
over the years, this is common. So it's
not like we were some you know, it's
not a standout, guys. There's probably 75 other
people that saw the same thing coming. I'm
making a point for that about that for
a reason. But it says they described it
as a similar strategy to 2020 when Iran
gave Iraq heads up before firing their missiles
on the base. And guess what Trump said
then? How weak they are, and they couldn't
even get us, and we didn't get hurt
because you knew about it. I mean, it's
all right there in front of you.
So here, despite that information,
is what Tegseth was saying today.
So, again,
they told them. Trump said they told them,
but here's how they act about it.
It's pretty childish. Almost any American if you
had an opportunity to watch it in real
time. And I think You bet the part
was about how wonderful and beautiful it was.
Like, it's the same thing they always do.
They really gush about the military industrial complex.
Iran is certainly calculating the reality
that,
planes flew from the middle of America and
Missouri overnight
completely undetected over three of their most highly
sensitive sites, and we You mean the bases
that you coordinated with them on? Never got
we're talking about two things here. We're talking
about the coordination beforehand of their bombing and
then the coordination with Qatar of Iran's bombing.
Like, it's become very clear that Iran was
aware. They removed their material. They
it's obvious. Now we're gonna get to the
next part where it shows that apparently they
didn't even damage it, potentially not even at
all based on reports. We'll we'll let I'll
let you decide.
See, they can't just take it. Like, the
the point is they have to lie about
everything. And what they're doing right now is
pretending to be strong, which makes them look
even more weak. Like, say, we flew when
they didn't even know aside from you telling
them they were coming. Right? And the warnings
and everything else we talked about. We're able
to destroy nuclear capabilities
Which now has been reported that that's not
the case.
So it's just all bombastic.
Boys in those bombers are on their way
home right now. We believe that'll have a
clear psychological impact on how they view the
future, and we certainly hope they take the
path of negotiated peace. But I could not
Yeah. You're right. As all as Israel's bombing
them. Right?
It's just, you know, it's certainly possible that
Hegseth is not even in the know, which
wouldn't surprise me at all. He's just repeating
what he's told. But isn't that embarrassing?
You know, this idea that we're pretending like
it's not obvious what was going on by
acting like you're big and tough when the
reality is not even
that you coordinated this?
Well, here's what David Camp says. New York
time reports, that was weird pointing to earlier,
that Iran gave Cutter notice to avoid casualties
and that it was meant as a symbolic
strike similar to 2020.
Plus, there's also the Israeli factor in all
of this.
But I said exactly what I discussed as
the most likely outcome last night in stark
contrast to all the breathless partisan reporting about
sleeper cells and major escalations. World War three.
When all peep when will people stop following
mainstream alternative, mainstream media sources who regularly deceive
or get deceived?
Important to think about.
But here's interesting point. Mark Levin, yesterday,
saying The US has obtained intelligence
indicating Iran backed militias are plotting attacks on
American military bases in Iraq and Syria in
retaliation for the attacks. Well, it turned out
to be Qatar and Iraq.
But what's funny is it's not some bot
they were allowing you to see that. But
you see, the he's a Zionist manipulator, you
know, Fox News Zionist manipulator, who is simply
telling you to he's trying to frame in
a way that makes it sound like
they're failing as opposed to trying to walk.
See, they
would demonstrate
restraint
as weakness
when it's the exact opposite in my opinion.
Here,
this is funny. That always happens. I had
to land up the whole time. That's why
I took a screenshot. It's right here. Cutter
says Israeli strikes violate international law. So I
found this interesting.
So before they attack Cutter, Cutter had said
the Israeli strikes were violating the law. But
what we just heard, it's it's hollow from
from from professor Morandi.
They Qatar is literally like a vassal state
for Israel as far as I'm concerned. They
funneled money through them to Hamas. They're working
with them through negotiations.
It's it's very clear. That's why the rumors
and the rest are trying to say it's,
you know, Qatar is the one. It's just
that's an extension of Israel. It's just one
step away.
But they feign resistance. They do all the
time.
But I still find it interesting that they
said this before then they became the focal
point of Iran's bombing,
which could have been coordinated through Israel and
United States. It would make sense with everything
else we've seen. And then it would explain
why this was being put out.
Qatar, Israel's next real enemy after Iran. I
honestly think it's about trying to cover up
the way they've been facilitating through Qatar for
a very long time.
But it simply says, unbelievable. Israel's currently bombing
five countries, but some are already planning for
the next war.
War they're the peace peacemakers, we're being told.
But Glenn also points out, Qatar
hosts the largest US military base in the
region.
Qatar uses its air defenses to protect Americans
from Iranian retaliation.
Qatar then vehemently condemns Iran's retaliation and suggest
it may retaliate.
Then these are different stories you understand. One
over here is going Israel is the problem,
and then they come over here and go
Iran made a mistake. They're they're this is
my point. They're they're not they're they're not
real on what they're saying. But it says,
then they that yet we're consistently told Qatar
is a grave American enemy.
See, it's a construct, guys. They know that
they're using them through through Israel. Israel knows
that, but they need you to see them
as the problem. And maybe they become the
scapegoat when they no longer want them to
be used like they've done with every other
ally they've had in the past.
But it simply is pointing out that Qatar's
foreign ministry response to the Islamic Republic Of
Iran
to
condemn the attacks
on the base in Qatar, which you expect.
Right?
But Kavork Al Masian says, Qatar also brought
the Al Qaeda regime in Damascus
to break the axis of resistance in support
of Israel.
So the truth is they're on the side
of Israel and United States. So how this
plays out and why they're being the focal
point? I mean, I I I would be
willing to bet you that US and Israel
or maybe just one of
them gave them the allowance to do so,
and that's why they removed the troops. There
was no casualties,
And then Cutter gets to go, we're condemning
the thing. It all seems very controlled, which
I was considering yesterday. But today, the evidence
seems overwhelming.
Not proof, but the evidence is very clearly
pointing in that direction, as I'm sure you
can already tell.
Randy Fine, this maniac, comes out and says,
less than an hour ago, I said on
the house floor, when our enemies say they
wanna kill us, we should believe them.
Oh, consider the same thing in reverse, by
the way, how often they say that. But
it says, and now, just moments later, Iran
is launching missiles at our base in the
core in Qatar. Muslim terrorism is not rhetoric.
They take advantage of anything they can. Like,
imagine the the idea that you know that
that's a deal they made then still trying
to accuse them of crimes. But as Glenn
says,
the use of six missiles by Iran
against a US airbase in Qatar
with no casualties
shows how terroristic and bloodthirsty Iran is. Right?
The US did nothing,
Just minding its own business, not bothering Iran,
when out of nowhere, the mullahs launched that
vicious terror attack.
Right?
I mean, it's just dishonest to argue that
we didn't see a unilateral attack on Iran,
and then Iran, at this point, is now
responding to multiple attacks from two different countries,
and yet he makes them out to be
the the terror here?
That's because he's a maniac, guys. He's the
one praising dead children. He does it all
the time.
Barak Ravid, a Zionist, says Israeli official tells
me Iran launched six missiles toward US bases
in Qatar. I think Aaron Matej just makes
an excellent point. He goes, I it's actually
twofold in my opinion. He goes, I wonder
if The US will retaliate by hitting Iran's
military bases in Canada and Mexico.
You know, the bases that don't exist, they're
literally nowhere. There are no bases outside of
Iran,
which is very stark and very, very, very
clear to think about. But on top of
that,
think about the logic.
Israel responds
or rather through all of this, they respond
by hitting Qatar, which is obviously meant to
deescalate.
And yet they then pound their chest and
go, see? They're terrorists. We can't let them
get away with this, which is just why
you never deal with these people. I'm talking
about The US and Israel.
So there's two full point that why it's
absurd to argue that the bombing other side
bases would somehow be what they're talking about,
but also that they just don't have any
other bases or any bases. It's Iran. At
their bases circle Iran as their you know,
it's just insulting to your intelligence.
Now Fiyero Isabelle points out,
full it's a full statement by the chief
of staff of Iranian armed forces.
The punishment of the Zionist entities prime minister
Netanyahu will continue with force until he is
rendered incapacitated.
Trump violate now what's funny is they'll make
this out to be, which it's very clearly
is a threat,
but how funny it is that that's
everything they keep doing.
Israel has been saying, Kamini can't be alive.
He can't exist anymore, but they'll make this
out to be terroristic rhetoric.
Trump violated all international laws by entering our
national spare space and striking three locations within
our sacred homeland causing damage.
Regardless of the extent of that damage, this
violation will not go unanswered.
This move by Trump was born out of
desperation.
At last dish effort to save an agent
in the region. Now it's very well possible
that this statement's the same thing they're doing.
That they made an agreement, but then they're
just saying things out loud
that work for them anyway.
But it says,
yeah, it just says, at desperation, a last
ditch effort to save his agent in the
region, Israel,
and particularly Netanyahu.
Trump recognized signs of Netanyahu's weakness and political
collapse and sought to artificially
resurrect him with this escalation
action.
This was a serious miscalculation, and we have
repeatedly warned of its consequences. While the punishment
of Netanyahu will continue until he is neutralized,
a proportionate response will also be delivered to
the American action.
This was this morning.
Extend I extend heartfelt appreciation to the dear,
conscious, and unmatched Iranian people. Your solidarity, sympathy,
and unwavering support for the armed forces is
the backbone of our strength. The warmth of
the people's love for the soldiers of Islam
will ignite into flames that will consume the
enemy's foundations is
absolutely clear. He says, the sons of this
nation and the armed forces will never tolerate
aggression. They will respond decisively. You know, just
saying we're not gonna back down is the
point.
Now,
Putin, which we are all expecting,
spoke up today, or rather they the clip
is going around today on our team. But
the point is, it says, the absolutely unprovoked
aggression against Iran has no basis and no
justification,
which by the way, if you were gonna
make the criticism of a rat of Russia
and Ukraine and not do it here, you're
a twofold moron. The point is that's not
what actually happened with Ukraine and Russia, which
you can prove a 100 times over. But
even if you think that, the fact that
you wouldn't call it out when even even
more egregious case just makes the case for
me. But it's obviously unprovoked.
But then he says Russia is taking steps
to support the Iranian people. Now the the
floated idea of them getting nuclear weapons, which
I haven't necessarily been able to verify, which
seems like a very self serving idea. Like,
why Russia and anything would even say that
out loud unless the idea is to, you
know, maybe scare them back, which I mean,
my point is I don't think Russia or
any of the rest of them are stupid
enough to not know how belligerent The US
and Israel are. Saying that's not gonna stop
them. So why would they say it out
loud? It's kind of my logic, but it
doesn't mean it didn't happen. The idea that
they're gonna give them nuclear weapons. Right? Russia,
China.
I mean, what's their why why that would
be a problem for everybody? Oh, it's only
because they've made this the other. That's the
only reason this makes sense to anybody. And
then lied about them the entire time. But
Khaleesi points out, Justin, this was, before we
went live, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, UAE,
and Kuwait all condemned the unprovoked Iranian attack
on The US base in Qatar. You gotta
love that. We condemned the thing, the response,
the uncondemned the condemned or excuse me, the
unprovoked.
I just I mean, it's just is anybody
believe that? Is there literally anybody in the
world dumb enough to think it was unprovoked?
Are you just all going along with it
because that's your team?
It's so wild to me.
And of course, Trump says complete and total
ceasefire. We'll talk about this stuff now. Let
me see if there's anything else I wanna
get to before we go into that. Let
me just quickly rattle off some of these
points and we'll finish with whatever is currently
happening that Orwell's been sending me. She probably,
like, 17 things that I got to go
over here, which thank you. I'm glad. But
it this is important to highlight. So some
of the things that might have happened in
the meantime, like, in the last, you know,
half day and the bombings that took place
before that,
he's claiming here that Iran killed the head
of Mossad. Now that this is being reported,
but I haven't been able to flush this
out. It largely seems to come from this
one platform,
one India, which I I can't verify if
it's actually maybe maybe it's happened since then
that it's been more verified.
But it makes sense. The video does the
there shows some of the bombings, and it
does show what they claim is is the
Mossad headquarters on fire in Tel Aviv because
that's where it is, in Tel Aviv.
And he simply says the Israeli secret terrorist
organization, the Mossad, the Mossad headquarters was destroyed
in a precise missile strike.
Now if it was, they'll never tell you
that. They will never ever ever admit that
because that's how, you know, kind of weak
these people are. And I'm talking about both
the US government and the Israeli government and
how often they will lie about the reality.
But
if it is true, that's a major escalation.
It's just all the more reason why they
won't back down.
But it also shows you that they're losing
if you really break it down.
Now Israeli military says it this is what
I was saying earlier. This is today or,
you know, basically late night or in this
morning, carries out over a 100 strikes in
Tehran.
In Tehran, not Iran, but Tehran, the main
capital city. A 100 strikes. Are we pretending
there's a 100 nuclear facilities?
Are we pretending that there's a 100 military
targets? I mean, come on, guys. They're bombing
Tehran, and it's not shocking. They've done it
everywhere else.
And it's making it strike. Look, I'll jump
ahead and it's clear.
Israel bombs a power supply system.
Of course, just like every they're gonna go,
they use it for terrorism and then nobody
cares. Even though evidence should matter here, right,
as they're bombing civilian infrastructure,
the laws never apply to Israel. Israeli military
says it's striking government targets.
So are we talking about new is it
just the nuclear threat, or now are you
just at war with Iran? Guys, we already
knew where this was going. Israel is going
ahead with what they want regardless of anybody
else, and that is the war with Iran.
It's what they've always wanted. So they're bombing
power structures. They're bombing food installations. They're bombing
government locations. They're bombing scientists.
They're bombing innocent people in towns, in buildings
in Tehran. It's everywhere you look. It's like
with Lebanon. You realize this is not Gaza.
There's evidence. There's people filming. We can prove
it.
And they're telling you on top of it,
which is all the more crazy.
And this goes back to that point of,
hey, Seth. The US officials concede they don't
know the whereabouts of their stockpile. Did he
just tell you that we successfully destroyed everything?
Yeah. Because ten seconds later, what Israel told
us is that we saw them moving it
away, which was already known because that's the
extension of the narrative. They moved the civilian
program because The US and every or somebody
warned them about it. So then you got
the excuse to say they moved it. We
have to keep bombing them.
You see how this all cycles through? We're
it's very clearly being manufactured, in my opinion.
Now,
spatsnaz
o o seven
simply says,
this is probably one of the greatest US
military fails. A PR disaster waiting to backfire.
Iran's nuclear facility, according to him, in Inforda
remains intact with little to no damages.
The nuclear program not only still exists, but
is being sped up thanks to a new
foreign support. Ah, okay. Right? So the point
is
arguing somewhat the reality of what seems to
be and I well, this is just these
points right here.
And where was it?
Oh, that I swear I had that in
there.
Did I not grab that? Well, anyway, the
general point is there's arguments. Not this my
point is not this is just one person
posting this. That they didn't really get the
effect they they wanted on these buildings. And
I I showed that yesterday, in fact, that
one of the places, in fact, is far
far more difficult to reach, and they argued
they weren't even capable of doing that.
And so the point is they didn't really
destroy what they claimed they did, even though
that was the narrative. Then it turns out
they moved the material anyway, so it just
it was all manufactured. But
they're now trying to make it sound like
they didn't do it at all, which even
more so gives them the excuse to say,
see,
they're they're they're in fact ramping up the
nuclear weapons program because of this, which is
exactly what people want to be the case.
And maybe it is because that's what they're
driving them toward. I just think this is
kind of a thread meant to build that
direction to make it seem like you're supporting
them while arguing that they're seeking the weapons
that they're not. But either way, I think
it's being, you know, coordinated in a way.
So here's what Israel right away came out
and said.
Iranian master plan for Israel's annihilation.
Four decade campaign built on three deadly pillars.
Think about saying this after how many times
you've tried to regime change, have successfully regime
change, and have undermined attack and starved Iran.
Bombed Iran, hit their, you know,
airline six five five, you know, bomb civilian
planes.
And you're gonna say they're the ones. It's
just crazy to me. But the three pillars,
nuclear weapons, despite all the evidence and how
often they're getting caught lying about this, ballistic
missiles, which see my point, now it's just
expanding into every how how long until they're
saying handguns and rifles? It just it doesn't
matter.
Ground invasion of via proxies, Hezbollah, Lebanon, Houthis,
even Hamas, who they fund.
You're being lied to, guys, that it Israel
is trying to coordinate this very clearly.
Now here's the Washington Wall Street Journal rather.
See, doesn't it seem conflicting?
So here they are going, we're not gonna
stop because Iran's coming after us. Then, when
they feel a need because of strategy, they
say, Israel seeks to wrap up the fighting
soon
because they wanna pause. They're not gonna stop,
guys. Mark my word. That's not stopping. This
is going to continue unless The US stops
them
or somebody.
But think about today. Our Israel wants to
wrap it up. What is it? What is
it? A cocktail party? You know, wrap it
up?
I I just get blown away by the
dishonesty of our media.
But Sarah points out, and this is GlobeLine
News, which I don't support. I've I've just
don't I think there's a lot of these
new place out there that I think are
deceiving in certain ways. But Israel informed Iran
it wants to end the war, but Iran
rejected and replied that the time has not
yet come, which does seem to be generally
being reported. But so Sarah simply says Israel
is finding out it's much harder when it's
not fighting sleeping children in 10 tents full
of displaced families. I agree with that. But
the argument is that Israel tried to kind
of pull back and Iran wasn't ready for
that, which would make sense to me. But
Pepe Escobar says the same thing, desperation row.
Israel's channel eleven reported this. Israel sent a
formal message to Iran saying Tel Aviv wants
to end the war, the war that they
started.
Iran, the time for ending the war has
not yet come.
So he says it will come when the
Israeli economy will be completely paralyzed.
So in a way, if this is the
reality, then it seems like they're reaping what
they're sowing.
But that just and where we at on
time, I think I'm just gonna wrap this
a lot. I wanna get to all the
things he was sharing. So the point is
that the squirrel
argues that he does not believe that's real,
which I I kind of agree with. The
reports of them seeking end of the war,
that is a ploy. That I mean, I
I think everything we already know of these
both these groups makes that astoundingly clear. The
only reason they would ever do that is
if they just needed a moment to gain
what they wanted from it, like they did
in Yemen, like they did in Gaza, like
they do everywhere, in Syria, for example.
But you can read this. He just makes
a really accurate case a good case about
why this is happening.
And Ryan Grim says Israel says it will
increase the pace of bombing Iran in order
to persuade Iran to end a war that
Israel started against Iran.
So this this is, like, moment to moment,
hour to hour. So they were like, we
want an end, and they said, like, we're
not ready. And so Israel says, we're gonna
bomb you harder than we ever have to
seek an end of the war.
That's not what they want, obviously.
And even Bannon
reporting this
says Trump is proud and bold and precise,
and he just praises him like crazy. It's
gross.
And says, but now he's media the media
is saying, we don't know where the material
is. The media is not saying that. That's
the government telling the media they're reporting that.
But he says, and you know what follows
all that line of thought? And it does
actually sound like he's worried about it, like,
doesn't want it, but irrelevant. He says, boots
on the
ground. It's coming.
Which I I actually agree with that. The
argument being, well, we can't find it. We
have to go in and find the material.
It seems like another Israeli plot, like with
Iraq and like everything else.
And of course, back to DC Draino.
Especially with what's happening right now. Right? Claiming
a ceasefire and then Israel continue to bomb.
But he says, looks like people who trusted
president Trump will write again. How long until
he deletes that? Let's start taking bets.
And the guy says, I genuinely don't know
what this could be possibly referenced to. He
says, what win are you claiming here? Being
Israel's b I t c h? Our base
is getting bombed? Starting World War three? Oil
prices skyrocketing? Let's be clear. Oil prices falling,
as far as I could tell, fluctuating,
hardly falling. In fact, what's continuing to happen
is guaranteed to make those prices go up.
But DC Draino got these talking points,
just like he did with the Epstein folder.
So we'll come back to this and let's
see these or some ending points we'll go
over actually.
Okay. So these are ones that she's or
let me grab all of them real quick
and we'll go over these together.
Let me do this so we can
show them up in front of you.
Okay.
So if you're right there, Orwell, send me
anything else that you think is important. We're
gonna go over it all right now.
I think that was that one. Let me
double check.
Okay. This one,
I'm just gonna do like seven or eight
things. Yeah. That's that one. And we'll just
kinda wrap up with what the current information
is showing us.
I'm not gonna go too much in-depth on
these. Obviously, especially since I haven't, you know,
all this is the first I'm gonna see
all this stuff. So I'm basically just gonna
report to you what is being stated, but
take that with a grain of salt seeing
as how neither myself or Orwell have, you
know, vetted all this out like we might
do in a normal day.
And just just so it's clear, by the
way, there's a lot of people out there
that send stuff to TLAB, which I if
anybody out there is interested, you know, there
there's, like, all the people you see in
the chat, you know, these are part these
people are part of the TLAB team. They're
part of my family as far as I'm
concerned and are constantly sending me stuff that
I that I can look at. It's it's
the open source investigation. So just to make
that note, if you're out there,
join the team, join the family, help us
out, reach out with information. It's important or
do it for somebody else. It's it's for
me, it's about the truth of the information.
Okay.
So I'm gonna go through this in the
order they were sent.
And so what the commentary was as well,
they agreed to a cease fire. They claim
on both sides. As usual, it seems that
Israel continue to bomb because they don't want
that.
Yeah. Israel bombing Iran.
Okay.
Okay. Let's go through it. So here is
what we have left. Here's what the first
point was
from Truth Social. It says congratulations to everyone.
Now usually what these things are is narrative
management. Right? This is what they want you
to report the narrative is, what you want
is what they want you to see, you
know, what they want you to think is
going on. And which is not always not
what's happening, but in many cases, it turns
out to not be the full picture or
a lie.
Congratulations to everyone, he says. It has been
fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran
that there will be a complete and total
ceasefire. Now why would that be only between
them seeing as The US just bombed Iran?
Doesn't that seem a little stupid?
Again, I'm just I've this is the first
time seeing this. In approximately six hours from
now, when Israel and Iran have wound down,
which means Iran Israel's gonna keep bombing, that's
the point,
and complete their progress, final missions, missions,
so stupid, for twelve hours,
at which point the war will be considered
ended.
So but I thought we weren't at war.
Didn't you just distress that very heavily?
Officially, Iran will start the ceasefire, and upon
twelve hours,
on the twelfth hour, Israel will start the
ceasefire.
Right? So you're making is Iran start at
first, and which I promise you, Israel will
bomb, which I think is what's going on.
And then we're supposed to let them finish
their what they need to do, and then
you'll start later. Why wouldn't you both start
at the same moment?
It's designed to fail, in my opinion. That
already that's what Guts already telling me with
just what he's wrote.
It goes on to say,
Israel will start the ceasefire,
and upon the twenty fourth hour, an official
end of the of the twelve day war.
Is that what they're now calling it that,
really?
It's already it's already a name. Will be
saluted by the world. So he's telling you
how to respond to this. It's so funny.
You know, we're gonna salute you for walking
back something you guys started.
How childish is that?
And it says during each ceasefire,
the other side will remain peaceful and respectful.
How much you wanna bet that's not what
happens? In fact, let me know in the
chat if you already see that not happening.
On the assumption that everything works as it
should, which it will,
he's so funny, I would like to congratulate
both countries, Israel and Iran. Oh, wait. I
thought Iran was the big deep state boogeyman.
Now now you're
this is funny to me.
And it goes on to say, and having
a
courage stamina, encourage, intelligence to end what should
be called the twelve day war. So he's
trying to create the name for it too.
His hubris is astounding. This is a war
that could have gone for years and destroyed
the entire Middle East.
It's, you know, it's like the way he
framed what was supposed to be the the
Abraham Accords or the deal of the century,
which was just a complete farce, but he
really sold it as, like, this monumental
earth shattering change, which is kinda scattering of
followers trying to pretend I mean, in the
sense of ones that just were willing to
lie no matter what. Even his followers at
the time were like, that's not really point
is it look where we are. It didn't
happen. Robert called it out. Same thing's happening
here.
Okay. So this, Khaleesi says, adviser to the
speaker of the Iranian parliament,
calls to end the war from Trump and
the Zionist entity are a deception
to pave the way for a surprise attack.
If we are not vigilant, we will not
we will not we will be surprised by
a devastating attack.
So, again, Khaleesi is saying that. I can't
verify that's the case, but it rings true
with what I would expect.
You know, that they would scream that this
is happening while in reality that they're not
buying it. But here's the White House. Congratulations
to everyone. Just pointing out what Trump said,
probably without any due diligence.
Drop site news.
This was 06/2005.
Breaking Israeli Israel strikes Tehran. Now, okay, you
you could try to make the argument this
was that window we created, but why in
the world would that make sense to Iran?
Just let them continue to bomb for twelve
hours. It's just that's just absolutely stupid.
But it says, it's been over forty minutes
since Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had
been reached to begin in six hours.
Here's what has unfolded since the announcement. These
Israeli military issued evacuation warnings to Tehran's 66.
So you see, that's a ramp up. You
would not continue if they you would walk
back things that are happening or anything you
weren't immediately able to slow down. Not just
not carry out six more bombings at the
very place you're gonna make a deal with.
It just this is it shows you inherently
that they don't believe what they're already doing.
So they already did get evacuation warnings for
places they're going to bomb. Shortly afterward, Israeli
warplanes launched multiple air strikes against Tehran.
Iran Iran's state media
reported explosions in several neighborhoods. You know, civilians
is the point.
In response, Iran has issued an evacuation warning
for the one of the locations in Tel
Aviv. Iran has reportedly downed another Israeli drone
in Tehran.
So clearly going back and forth. Now how
in the world do you think this ever,
like, just stops
on a deadline Trump demands?
He it's it it really is hubris in
a way.
Or or that none of them actually believe
that it's gonna happen. That he can just
declare a time they're all gonna stop. There's
no reason why they would follow that. Breaking
nine one one reports, bomb threat reported near
the White House. That's interesting. Some nearby buildings
evacuated.
I mean, look, I we're all watching for
these potential false flags
as we always should be, but more than
ever right now. Because the idea is that
they're trying to convince you that there's some
Iranian sleeper cell dynamic that they can do
anything for and say, see, just like they've
been doing the whole time with immigration, with
anything else. Just jumping at the shadow and
convincing you of whatever they want you to
think it was. And all the same people
we could list off will jump up and
say whatever Trump just said without any due
diligence but call themselves journalists.
DDG Politics says Iranian Fars News reports that
an informed source has denied
Trump's ceasefire claim,
which wouldn't surprise me. So then they can
come back and say, see Iran broke the
deal, and just try to use that same
thing.
Speaking to Fars News, the source stated that
the ceasefire proposal announced by Donald Trump is
completely false and was intended to distract from
the recent humiliation The United States suffered after
attacks
on its regional basis.
That makes sense. Source added that Iran has
not received any official or unofficial ceasefire proposal.
This wouldn't surprise me. But remember,
this is what the the the news group
is saying and maybe the Iran held it
close to the chest. Maybe they wanna accept
it, but they don't want you to know
they're going to. I mean, there's all sorts
of possibilities.
Keep an open mind. Don't fall for the
partisan games.
Emmanuel Fabian says the IDF Home Front Command
says there are no changes to its guidelines
for the Israeli public after Donald Trump said
Israel and Iran have agreed to a cease
fire. Quote, the public has requested you continue
to follow the instructions of the Home Front
Command through official channels. Gatherings are still banned.
Schools and workplaces are still closing with the
guidelines, which would make sense, seeing as how
they're still bombing.
Khaleesi reports as of 07:41.
Tehran, Times, and Forest News say there's no
agreement of a ceasefire.
It's not not surprising.
Drop site news as of 07:35,
Iran's semi official news says, informed source says
the ceasefire proposal put forward by Trump is
completely false.
More reports making the same plan.
Begins to seem like it's false, but
we'll have to wait and see.
Yeah. This is this is far as news.
Excuse me. Hiccups all of a sudden.
And,
yeah, same thing. Informed source.
This is Solomon Ahmed. Unconfirmed reports say that
Ali Khamenei, the leader Ali Khamenei's son, was
the one who was assassinated. Okay. That's a
that's a big deal.
Iranian opposition media claims that Iran's supreme leader
residence was targeted with dozens of bunker busting
bombs. Okay. It very well may be that
this is the whole point.
That would make sense to me. A floated
lie of a ceasefire that was never even
offered, but so they're spinning their heads around
going, what's going on? And they try to
assassinate a leader.
That really does make sense. But again, we're
theorizing based on limited information right now.
But he follows up and says, unconfirmed reports
say that it was his son,
which, you know, they would lie about that
if they needed
to.
Saeed
Aaragi
says that
as Iran has repeatedly made clear, Israel launched
war on Iran, not the other way around.
As of now, there's no agree our agreement
on any ceasefire. So that seems to be
the consistent opinion here.
He also has the military operations of our
powerful armed forces to punish Israel for aggression
continued until the very last minute at 4AM.
Together with all Iranians, I thank our brave
armed forces.
Pack the enemy to the very last minute.
Okay. I don't see anything else new.
So let's just do this
since we're here.
See if anything pops up.
Running officials tell CNN that they have not
received or agreed to yeah. I mean, this
seems to be the consistent report.
So what a perfect way to end this
ridiculous discussion.
So now they're literally floating as far as
we could tell, but I
due diligence and and, you know, intell
just,
responsibility would suggest that we should wait until
at least tomorrow to wait and see if
Iran, you know, might have held us back
for some reason, which is certainly possible.
But
from what we can see, the idea that
they would float a fake ceasefire, try to
assassinate the leader,
it's just it's it's what they do. I
mean, it's isn't that what we've been saying
the whole time? And I don't mean my
guess. I mean, what they've done, what we
can prove they've done, and now it seems
like that's what they're doing too today.
So I'm I'm gonna go make sure I
add all these for you since we have
I haven't actually clicked them into the show
notes yet.
Incredible hostage style phone call with a Mossad
operative threatens to murder an Iranian general and
his wife and child if he doesn't produce
anti Iranian war propaganda for Israel within twelve
hours.
Jeez.
That's just insane. I mean, again, I can't
verify that, but the thing is it's just
exactly what you'd expect from what they've already
been caught doing.
More shoot more open shots at the people
in Gaza.
Not surprising there.
Yep.
Is this ceasefire announcement sort of like the
Trump said he was committed to a democratic
resolution and then bombs began dropping at three
hours later? Kinda seems that way. Well, I'm
gonna leave it there unless there's anything else
you guys wanna show me that's irrelevant right
now. I think that's a good place to
leave it.
But my God.
It just, you know, it's it's just it
doesn't doesn't change. I mean, that's that's the
whole thing is that, you know, people people
show you their nature. You know, it's it
obvious if you know like, people can change
in some in some ways, people can act
differently. They can act in a way that's
not typical. But, historically, you know, there's a
there's clearly a track record. You can see
what they've done. You can see what they've
claimed. You can see what the the kind
of ways they've lied. And here we are
with the same exact setup.
So maybe and we can certainly hope that
they're gonna go for the right thing and
that they all want the end of the
war, but did they wanna end the war
with Gaza? No. They wanna end the war
with Lebanon or Syria. I mean, they got
the the ceasefires, then they pushed forward anyway.
The same thing I didn't Yemen with Saudi
Arabia. It's who they are,
which is not the same as saying America.
It's the governments that control this place, and
they're not working for you.
I mean, for crying out loud, that's that
seems to be like a leading talking point
in the Republican party right now, or rather
conservatives
within that party.
Just gotta call it out. So thank you
for tuning in and caring about the truth.
We do this every single time for free.
Put out the work, the long term efforts,
the research,
because it's important, because we want you to
be able to see that whether or not
you wanna pay for it. But if you
believe in this work and you'd like this
to continue, we need your support,
frankly, more than ever. I mean, honestly, to
a degree that I'm surprised I'm not flailing
and screaming about right now. Like, we need
your support.
I just don't think it's the last thing
I'm gonna do right now is go into
a diatribe about how we need we're struggling.
There's a lot more important things happening in
the world. But just understand that this platform
is already going through dramatic changes because of
the attacks we've suffered, tens of thousands of
dollars of attacks
and lawsuits,
you know, that has as you I'm sure
you've noticed,
less writing, less a lot of things. In
fact, even less this because of multiple reasons.
But I'm determined to keep that going. But
just again, if you find value in this,
please support this platform.
A dollar a dollar a month of recurring
is all I ever ask. Just get
a thousand of those, 100,000 of those. We'll
never ask for another cent. And the point
is to keep doing the work.
Bring them back all the writing. Keep growing
it out. Get more people doing video reports.
Really expand this
to, like, you know, to
a a a fully fledged die dynamic,
but with honesty,
with integrity, with principles, with objectivity.
That's hard to see today.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
If you take away the Soviet Union and
its chief proxy, the PLO,
international terrorism would collapse.
If you take out Saddam,
Saddam's regime, I guarantee
you that it will have enormous positive reverberations
on the region. Obviously, we'd like to see
a regime change, at least I would, in
Iran, just as I would like to see
in Iraq. The question now is a practical
question.
What is the best place to proceed? It's
not a question of whether Iraq's regime should
be taken out, but when should it be
taken out? It's not a question of whether
you'd like to see a regime change in
Iran, but how do it Are there any
other nations that you would recommend that The
United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this
point?
The answer is categorically yes. The,
the two nations that are vying, competing with
each other, who will be the first to
achieve nuclear
weapons, is Iraq and Iran. But, a third
nation, by the way, is Libya as well.
Libya is,
trying very rapidly to build
an atomic bomb capability. So you have here
now three all stand together to stop Iran's
march of conquest,
subjugation,
and terror.
I know that
no matter on which side of the aisle
you sit,
you stand with Israel.
Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly, and in their leadership, they are in
veteran liars. Let me say that again. They
are liars.