The point is that there it's a trap
in order to get people to focus on
the the Jewish population as opposed to the
religion these, political ideology of the Zionism. And
there's a lot of Jewish people in the
world that are calling this out. Dan Cohen,
for example, is an excellent journalist. He's a
Jewish person himself who's been really going after
this. But the point is that there are
Orthodox Jewish communities that protest in Israel, that
protest in UK, that protest in The United
States, who are saying openly that this we
are orthodox Jews and Zionism does not represent
us. They get beat up by the IDF
in Israel every weekend. You know? So you
can't just pretend that one is the only
thing. But so the the bigger picture is
about trying to use this to manipulate people
into missing the larger reality of what's actually
happening. And that is infiltration, that is occupation,
that is subversion.
And the problem is that it's everywhere. This
is not unique to The United States. This
is not unique to I mean, it's it's
it's
I mean, I don't honestly, if you stand
back and look at the bigger picture, if
you stand back and look
at, I mean, Bosnia,
Rwanda,
South Africa, every single one of these provably,
unquestionably included the Zionist organization.
I mean, and we're talking in South Africa,
we're talking about apartheid, which is what Israel
currently is.
Ethnic bio weapons, these are all on the
record. South Africa,
Bosnia, a genocide. Rwanda, a genocide. Both of
which they were involved with the group. They
armed the group. They promoted the hatred. It's
all on the record. And it's like when
I looked into that, I'm going, like, on
the and I I always say this. I
hate the word anniversary for this. I don't
know what else to use, but the anniversary
for Wanda,
I looked into that, interested. And I I
I've heard the stories about this. I never
really went too deep into it. And it
was like the most obvious thing in the
world. You barely cracked the story open, and
you're going, yeah. Right on the surface of
the story. You can see the Zionist entity
that's trying to manipulate this. They're saying, oh,
yeah. You know, what you're dealing with is
like us and the Palestinians. It's all documented.
And then gave them Uzis and different you
know, and the bottom line is you can
prove that they were involved with that. Now
you can see them committing a genocide today
in multiple places, in Syria and Lebanon, and
in no way, shape, or form does that
represent every Israeli or every Jew in the
world. That's the lie. That's the game. There's
Israelis and Jewish people at large rising up
and calling this out as a genocide.
You can prove
for left, right, just our government, that's, you
know, that's all it really is. There's no
partisan, dynamic game. It's really just one government,
is completely infiltrated by a foreign power.
It's
just
unnerving. You know? And it's like I try
very hard not to be alarmist in what
we do, but this is alarming.
It is a very hard time to live
in.
But at the same time, I feel like
I've never been more hopeful for where people's
minds are at.
People are people are listening. They're interested. And
that scares a lot of people, I think.
A lot of people in powerful positions that
need you to be in line with a
certain construct, like the two party illusion, for
example.
They don't care what answers you find if
they've got you asking the wrong questions.
In the two party illusion, the false binary,
you're never going to change anything if we
can't see past that.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection
of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Friday, 06/13/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. That was
the excellent work part of the documentary released
by T Snyder.
Synergy,
synergy,
no.
Synergy. Fam that's frustrating. All of a sudden,
top of my head, I'm blanking on the
I'm gonna make sure include his work, which
you should be following. I was gonna give
you the name of the thing which somehow
lost me all of a sudden. But,
on a side note about that, I'm gonna
we're gonna be trying to help promote Tisa's
work and and put some of this on
TLav to help get some more reach on
it and so on. But make sure you're
finding and I'm bringing this up right here
so you guys can see it on the
YouTube channel. Make sure you guys support his
work. He's out there doing this for free
because he believes in it, and it's powerful
stuff. This is just one aspect of basically,
what this documentary is, and it was about
fourteen minutes, is, one part of it's about
me in the beginning, just TLAB and what
we do, rather just TLAB and and me
through that. And then the union of the
inner wanted was a part of it, and
there's an overlap there because a lot of
us were at the,
at the carnival recently, Prestige Carnival. And so
it's really, really well done stuff. But I
just I wanted to share that with you
to show the opening part of that, the
the part that was just focused on what
we said and how relevant that is to
today. And, really, just a lot of stuff
going on, but, specifically,
Iran and Israel's attacks on Iran with The
US support or rather, you know, whichever way
you wanna look at that and how important
that really is to what's going on. And
for those that are paying attention,
not getting pulled into these partisan, childish, naive,
binary narratives every single day, have seen this
coming for a very long time and didn't
buy. The Netanyahu and Trump are dividing or
splitting apart despite all the screams of partisan
influencers.
Clearly, you've been paying attention and you saw
that this was one more of another ploy,
know, one of a long string of manipulations
to get us to not pay attention to
what they've always been trying to accomplish.
So check out his work just on that
opening point. Support him. I hope you will
because he's doing amazing work. And just, really,
just
to check out the ones with Derek and
the one with Hvoyer and and the different
people from the IMA. He's doing amazing work
on
this. So just starting with that and one
more shout out before we get into everything
else. I was on Fine Points this morning.
You know,
Fine Points is with a BitShoot podcast with
Bruce Fine and Jeffrey Wernick and myself. I
I joined here and there, and it's really
great conversations, really focused on and we don't
agree on everything as always. I never will
with anybody I talk to, quite frankly, most
likely.
But we focus on things that we can
discuss constitutionally, the law, the reality of it,
the precedents therein. Bruce being somebody who goes
back into, I think, the Reagan administration,
real a constitutional expert. Really great conversation. I
think it's worth checking out. We touch on
a lot of things I'm gonna go over
today.
Now today, what we're gonna get into in
general, I'm gonna start with a few points
I just don't want you to miss around
partisanship, but we're gonna open gonna get into
this beginning of this yesterday into the day
from the Iran conversation, the outage that was
very conspicuous,
like, the day they attack Iran. And I'm
not gonna say I can prove to you
I know that's connected. But you know as
well as I that a logical person is
gonna go, that's very that overlap is very
conspicuous, and it's worth interrogating.
Was this an example of where we're going
with the technocratic structure with this global kind
of you know, with those AI or surveillance
or the censorship dynamics to where they can
make something like that happen when it's important?
It's worth considering. Regardless, we saw a massive
outage and all of a sudden Israel's bombing
Iran. And it's gonna go we're gonna go
through today the evidence that shows very clearly
despite the screams of yesterday and the morning
today that Trump didn't know and there played
him or now he's just saying this because
he doesn't wanna look bad. It's very clear,
as anybody who's paying attention can see already
and knew before, that The US is involved
in this. They came out hot in the
when and let's be clear, long before this,
Biden even before, all on the same page.
But this Trump administration, just like the last
one, early on, Iran needs to do this,
and we're gonna bomb you to hell back
or whatever he said unless you do what
we say. Gun to the head kind of
negotiations, which never work. Important to understand how
this starts and understand that The US is
now clearly involved to the point to where
they're involved right now with the back and
that we'll get to. The moving of ships,
the bombing of bombing into Israel
by Iran. And, of course, that's now an
egregious terrorist attack despite the fact that they're
literally responding to an unprovoked attack by Israel
despite the narratives of what they claim they're
doing, even if what they say they're doing
is true in regard to nuclear weapons, you
know, processes,
does not make what they did legal.
It's pretty insane to see the western lockstep
narrative of we stand by Israel literally making
the point of anybody highlighting how obvious it
is that Israel's influencing government action. But we're
gonna go over where that is to this
point and all the different updates on that,
but then we're gonna talk about, if we
have time, depending on what we get to,
the conversation of LA.
Well, it's below this. Well, it's you can't
see it on the screen right now, but
we'll get to that. And the conversation of
the overlap of these two. Right? The immigration
conversation, the interesting point around Iran and how
that plays into it, but then also the
very jarring shift of Donald Trump, which, again,
if you
if you've been paying attention before this one
moment and you see the the lie of
the two party illusion, this probably won't shock
you. But the interesting development of Trump veering
away at a at the peak of the
of the rhetoric to to say that all
these illegal immigrants are okay. And he's already
said this once, by the way, but he
really went into it this time and made
it very clear we're talking about illegal immigrants
and the ones that we want to stay
are okay. It's just it's just blatant hypocrisy,
contradiction, and a lot of his own base
are pretty unhappy about it. And then, of
course, there's another part of that where he
talks about 500,000
Chinese visa students.
And, again, this is not good, bad, right,
or wrong. It's for you to decide. The
point is contradiction to what he's telling his
people, what his screaming base, not that's not
all conservatives, but the team sport politics side
are telling everybody.
All immigrants are bad. What Stephen Miller just
oozing out of his mouth every day about
how bad every one of them are no
matter what, calling all of them the worst
people and doing something like this.
Both of the stories. Farmers and leisure and
his hotels, those ones are okay after they
go after people who are literally here legally
and seeking visas, asylum, and then, you know,
and people it's just all hypocrisy.
And, of course, the Chinese aspect is interesting
with Loomer and the rest acting like China's
invading this country, which we should consider. But
interesting how that's being stated when everything else
shows you something else, him and Jones the
same way, having conversations about how this is
a Chinese overtaking with the communist overtaking through
the through the revolutions of the protests and
and riots, certainly possible.
I I just need facts personally, not just
conjecture based on the convenient narrative that pulls
you away from the obvious of what's going
on in the world. Certainly could be both,
couldn't it? But the evidence is what matters
to me. And all that while Trump then
goes, but these students are okay, and we'll
give them visas, and they can all stay
and and then saying we'll give them citizenship
afterward. It just does not line up. So
that's what we're gonna overarchingly get into today,
but there's a few points in between that
you will see. I wanna make sure I
shout out this interview we put out yesterday.
Frustratingly enough, as you guys briefly just know
saw that the Internet was all over the
place yesterday, rather
we'll get to it in a minute. It
was, I guess, completely it stemmed back to
Amazon Cloud Services and Google Cloud Services, which,
surprise, surprise, I'm so shocked that that's the
choke point. Exactly like we're talking about. We
should be running screaming from cloud services as
far as I'm concerned right now. Yes. It's
convenient. Yes. You can over you know, get
away from having storage, but you also lose
control.
And it will be taken advantage of. I
promise you. I think that's what we just
saw.
But as I was playing this interview yesterday,
as I thought it was back up, it
was choppy, and we missed it was all
over the place. So Odysee is a place
where this is uploaded seamlessly as well as
what's why I'm showing you this, the substack.
I posted that before it went out because
the Internet was down, so that'll be a
completely seamless
viewing of it. Shannon Joy and I had
a really great conversation. I really do appreciate
her perspective on things. And we're I'm she's
gonna invite me on her show as well.
And I just think it's important to, you
know, overlap different opinions and overlap audiences. And
we kinda have a joke behind the scenes.
Like, we've been trying to connect here and
there, and it's just I could go off
for ten minutes about the weirdness of missing
messages or things that don't pop up or
pop up later or
side note I haven't even gotten into, the
new phone switches. There's some weird stuff I
could talk about in there that I think
is deliberately manipulative,
electronic SIM cards and all that. But with
a new shift, I that had this whole
process where people's information, their text, their phone
calls, the voice messages were ending up on
my old phone that's actually in a blackout
pouch. Explain that for me. And I missed
all these in these messages until I look
at the old phone, like, weeks later and
go, and not on my new phone. Now
that just sounds like a glitch to me,
but either way, the point is I feel
like people don't want certain audiences to to
overlap, to connect because momentum builds. So watch
this interview, and I think you'll get a
sense of what I mean because of how
much we align and see these things, the
the illusion, the manipulations of all of it.
And I think it's a problem for
a a dwindling vulnerable narrative right now for
people like us to overlap. Just my personal
opinion. But check it out. Great conversation.
Now some two party illusion stuff that I
do actually think is relevant. I tried to
kick off as much as I could that
isn't relevant to the main two topics today,
but I think this is over relevant to
a few overarching points to what we're discussing.
You might have seen this.
And it's really kind of a a petty
point, really, but I do think it has
more meaning than you might think.
This is Paul Rand Paul saying, I've just
been told that I've been uninvited. Now to
be clear, Trump is staying. That's not true,
but I haven't sussed out the reality of
it yet. But he's saying, I've been uninvited
for the White House picnic. On the eleventh.
Every democrat has been invited, every republican invited,
but he hasn't been allowed. Now just think
about that.
If all democrats are invited, but the one
of the only two at least somewhat leaning
in the direction of America First, I only
say that because I'm pessimistic to all government
and, you know, question everything. But my point
is Massey and Rand Paul represent at least
the most
clear America First legitimate at you know, their
principles seem to be far more in line
with that than almost everybody in his administration.
And yet, he's the one boxed out. I
just think it's interesting. Massey says incredibly petty
and shortsighted of Trump's staff to exclude Republicans
from an annual White House picnic while inviting
Pelosi and every Democrat. He says, I always
give my few tickets to my staff and
their kids, but apparently, this year, my tickets
have been withheld as well.
Massey also. So let's pretend so as the
narrative comes around that it wasn't true, it's
either somebody else doing it or either way
but either way, that's
embarrassing and shows you something very important,
that it's about ideology.
It's about those not toeing the line whether
left or right. And I think these two
stand out in that exact regard, whether it's
Israel, whether it's foreign I mean, every conversation,
and you know it. Now these are things
that I'm talking about, and I'll just show
you this right now. Here's Massey again saying
bring this bill to the floor. This is
an easy no vote for anyone who took
their oath to the constitution seriously.
So speaking of the two party illusion grifter
types, here's Nick Sorter yet again cheering on
the violence against innocent people, cheering on the
fact that Trump just openly yet again said
something that is textbook
unconstitutional,
that people will be arrested for burning the
flag. Now regardless of what you think about
that, as Massey will tell you, Rand Paul
will tell you, Ron Paul will tell you,
and and the constitution will tell you, Supreme
Court precedents will tell you, Sort of like
the conversation of illegal immigrants and whether they
have rights. They do regardless of your ignorance
on the matter. It's very clear through the
legal reality. Same thing here. Whether or not
you think it's okay, it is the constitutionally
protected reality that if you want to burn
this flag or any other flag, you have
the right
to. And here is Trump for the time
that I'm aware of pushing the idea that
they should be arrested for that. To the
cheers of people, by the way, that I
found very interesting, turns out he
then this is from military.com.
Bragg soldiers who cheered Trump's political attacks while
in uniform were checked for allegiance and appearance.
They literally turned away military who did not
have a very certain mindset. You're all being
played. I mean, all of us is I
shouldn't say it's not directed to one I
mean, you could argue it's more directed towards
one audience, but anybody in the we're they're
creating a very clear per a picture to
manipulate Americans right now. That is what it
looks like. That's straight up not just propaganda.
That's Orwellian.
And people were you know? And it I
don't wanna go into all of this. There's
all sorts of moments you could talk about
with the cheering about things you may not
think are okay to cheer about. Whatever. My
point is simply about that happening in general.
And the idea that that's one of these
clips of them cheering on whatever Trump said
because that was the whole point of creating
that construct. Here's what Nick has to say.
You know, the fake America types out there,
they're screaming about everything's America and Democrats hate
the country while everything everything they seem to
do goes against that very premise. Now I
don't know for sure that they know that.
I think it could be a mix of
ignorance, willful ignorance, and just straight up dishonesty.
But there are a lot of people out
there that I I I see as the
like, the ones destroying the America idea who
are the ones leading that charge or pretending
to anyway. He says president Trump announced he
will see supporting legislation, but by the way,
regardless of whether they'll it passes through legislation,
it doesn't change the reality that it's unconstitutional.
That is supreme court precedent, Mabler versus Madison
and others, which if it is repugnant to
the constitution, it's null and void. Now that
I'm going to all of that yet again,
the reality is very clearly that if you
look at the Bill of Rights, which is
just simply the 10 amendments to the constitution,
you will recognize that every one of them
didn't in in no way contradicted or repugnant
to any other part of it. That's why
it was legitimate.
And the ruling eventually came through because there
were efforts to do so that if you
try to pass a law that is repugnant
to the constitution, meaning it's contradictory,
It is null and void whether or not
you pass it, whether or not all of
our illegitimate congress members think it's okay. That's
the important reality. That's why it's that's the
shall not be infringed, inalienable right dynamic, whether
you're talking about constitution or any of it.
Same thing with suspending this or changing that
or during COVID nineteen saying we can turn
this off because pathogens. Same point. It applies
both left and right, same conversation.
So in this case,
if you're trying to pass legislation that makes
something happen that is unconstitutional, well, it is
illegitimate.
But, see, these are America people that either
don't know that or don't care. But he
goes on to say one year in jail
for burning the flag. He says, we've now
seen illegals
do this multiple times. It that's quite frankly
relevant. He says, over the past several days,
what difference does it make? It's more outrageous
because somebody else should it be less outrageous
if somebody else doesn't? It's just they're trying
to make an emotional ploy plea to people
to act like that's more
they're, you know, that they're here illegally and
they're spinning in your eye kind of a
thing. This is all about emotional manipulation. He
says all patriots
should support this. That's my real point.
Either he doesn't know what that means or
he has a completely different definition of patriot
or America
Of course, even now, and this wasn't there
when I saw this yesterday, black burning is
protected under the amendment. I mean, it's right
on his own the platform that he feels
supports them. Think about how silly that is.
And I simply said, oh, this is before
that was up there. All patriots should support,
admit you don't care about or don't understand
the constitution without saying you don't care about
or understand the constitution. This is openly unconstitutional.
Fake America two party illusion. And interestingly, Glenn
Greenwald saw this and said, one of the
most vocal advocates for criminalizing American flag burning
has been Hillary Clinton. She repeatedly sponsored laws
to provide for jail time. You see, because
that's the real point. They are the same
thing when it comes to using whatever they
can to suppress you, left or right, simply
people, the peons they see as under them.
The problem is the supreme court twice ruled
flag burning is protected expression. So it would
require a change to the amendment, which is
the reality being
not possible. You understand? You can't alter
inalienable,
un inherent rights through legislation, and then that
be would become you get the point. It's
that's the whole thing. You can't just change
these by legislation. But they've tricked a lot
of people, probably like Nick Sorder, into thinking
that way, or they don't care. It's your
choice.
So I said, so you're politically aligned with
Hillary Clinton, Nick, but I doubt that will
alter your blind allegiance to the narrative that
you're told to to push even if blatantly
unconstitutional
and as you claim you be America
Again, Thomas Massie says very clearly, this is
those these are people that forgot their oath
to the constitution.
So I think it's very worth understanding that
because this is a major thing
channeling through people claiming they care more about
the constitution than anybody else or anything else.
And now they don't care. Now this is
either a combination of people that are using
this because they're not and they actually wanted
the story of this country to trick people
in that direction or just ignorance of that
reality.
Now here, just in case just so it's
relevant, I have three clips showing you this
is not a different this is a consistent
pattern from Trump,
that these things don't matter if it bumps
up against what he wants to achieve. And
he'll straight up call you an idiot, a
moron, for arguing
unconstitutional
or free speech. Here's what he said. Now
I'm gonna show you three things. One is
about a previous flag point, one is about,
the Internet, and one is about guns. All
of it has the same consistent pattern, and
you know it.
Put the American flag down. They were writing
Hamas on the bell outside of Union Station.
What does a Donald Trump do
if he takes office to these people on
the street?
Rarely have we seen anything like this, and
I think you should get a one year
jail sentence if you do anything to desecrate
the American flag. Now people will say, oh,
it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people. In other words, people
that understand the constitution.
Those are stupid people that say that we
have to work in congress to get a
one year jail sentence when they Which would
be illegal or rather unconstitutional and therefore null
and void regardless of whether they pass the
law. This is basic reality, guys. If you
don't understand these things, it's worth your time.
It behooves you to learn about it because
this is the reality. This is not a
nuanced point. This is not some different opinion
about it. This is the static reality.
And that's why that's why this is so
important to understand. He either doesn't understand this
or is trying to deceive you. They're allowed
to stomp on the flag
and put lighter fluid on the flag and
set it a fire. And when you're allowed
to do that,
you get a one year jail sentence and
you'll never see it again. And all over
the world, Putin and president Xi of China,
all over the world, they're watching this. Kim
Jong Un, he looks at us like we're
a bunch of babies. They see It's just
emotional BS, guys. They're just trying to get
you to feel stupid and get reactionary. So
you reactionary
react in the direction of what they want
to achieve. And it has nothing to do
with the flag. You think they give an
s they they don't care about that. They
want to use this as a foot in
the door to rationalize why if we claim
it's something that's bad, we can illegalize it
even if it has nothing to do with
what we're talking about. It's it's transparent, guys.
Here's the one about the guns,
amendment.
Right? And this is all about due process.
It's about your rights. In this case, we'll
do due process later. How does that sound?
The firearms
and then go to court because that's another
system. Because a lot of times, by the
time you go to court, it takes so
long to go to court
to get the due process
procedures. To go to court would have taken
a long time. So you could do exactly
what you're saying, but take the guns
go through due process
Now something that I've rare I haven't said
in the past in this because I feel
like it's self
it's self evident.
This shows you that he either doesn't understand
what due process means, like Kristi Noem, by
the way, or he's lying to you about
it or trying to convince you through this
kind of propagandized
media,
you know, framing that
that that is the way it works. Remember,
Kristi Noem literally responded around habeas corpus saying
that it's something the president right the president
has to x y and z, and then
when pushed, says,
Lincoln used it. Lincoln did not use habeas
corpus. He suspended it and then literally had
to follow-up with congress because it was deemed
illegal until that happened, which was then considered
legal because you can't do that. Congress has
the right to do that. If you're talking
about suspending habeas corpus, there's only two times
to do that. It's a whole conversation about
legal reality through constitution, acts of congress. Neither
none of that's happening. This is him telling
you due process later, which means he doesn't
understand what that means. You can't kept due
process later.
That invalidates the reality of what due process
means. Then you can have a process later
like Garcia's going through, but it does not
that's not due process because that's you've already
been dealt with, and then you're being forced
to handle it after the fact. Because if
you had given due process, you would have
been able to have a back and about
the facts that then led to what happened.
This is insane. It is shocking, and it's
unconstitutional.
Here's another example, and this was 2016,
I believe, and even talks about working with
Bill Gates to shut down the Internet because,
I guess, it was about ISIS, I think,
at the time.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet, and we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them, maybe, in certain areas, closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. Okay.
So
had Biden said we had to close down
parts of the Internet because of
transgender stuff.
I'm sure you'd have been okay with that.
Right? Because, well, he's got his his his,
logic. Right? I mean, just because it's a
thing you think whatever the narrative is, it's
the same principle.
And you know as well as I that
that would never stand for you, but people
ignored this because it's your person, just like
people ignored Biden and so on and so
on. It's just a true party illusion. But
Bill Gates, of course, let's work with Bill
Gates because he's on our side. Right? Well,
he apparently is now again because now he's
working with Trump for the mRNA platform, but
no one wants to talk about that. K.
Well, here is the
current
example. This is the newest one. This is
from, I think
oh, it was when he was at Fort
Bragg.
But they proudly carry
the flags of other countries,
but they don't carry the American flag. Which
is their right. It's called the constitution.
They only burn it. Did you see a
lot of the flags being burned?
They weren't being burned by And they don't
only burn it. There is plenty of people
that you can see that have American flags.
Even in these protests, you can there's plenty
of people that have flags they're not burning.
I mean, it's just dishonest to always frame
it as one way, but see, that's the
idea. That's like showing some of the violence
and claiming it's all riots,
exactly what they did to you last time.
But you guys clearly continue to demonstrate that
you partisans are exactly the same, and you
do the same thing back to them and
cry foul. Most of us, I think the
majority of liberals, conservatives, and just people who
see through all of it recognize that contradiction.
I'm hoping people can start to look at
that. I'm convinced. I think there's just people
all that's why this is getting so ridiculous.
And so, like, Jones is standing out like
a sore thumb because
most people are pulling away from how dumb
this all is. And if they just adhere
to the cartoon, it becomes even more obvious.
People
from
our country or from people that love our
country.
People that burn the American flag should go
to jail for one year. That's what they
should be doing. So imagine saying this for
the time
despite people, experts, no doubt, telling him that's
unconstitutional. The point is he doesn't care. If
you think for a he doesn't know that
or you're still of the mind that that's
not true, you're sec the per the last
part of it, then you're still completely and
shockingly uninformed.
But if you think he somehow doesn't know
that, then you're just being naive. Or you're
admitting that he completely is out of the
know of basic things, which should be scary
in his own right.
I mean, that's the general point. I mean,
it goes on from the same idea.
So
this is just included, by the way, on
this long string of things saying he'll censor
you for Israel, but these last two I
included because I thought it was important around
due process and free speech.
And I'll have to include that, the last
one. So what's important okay. And I I've
already showed you this briefly, but just you
can read the military.com
article, brag soldiers who cheered Trump's political attacks
while in uniform were checked
for allegiance, for appearance.
That's that should insult everybody
because that's not real, guys. He's giving you
a false impression because he thinks the military
cheering for him will give the kind the
and it probably will influence certain people.
Now I wanna include this because I think
it's important to think about in a larger
sense. But, look, let's be clear. Obviously, I
know a lot of this is trolling, guys.
I'm not an idiot. I understand that people
are out there trying to manipulate, you know,
like,
scare people, but in a way that is
meant to push them away to to manipulate,
to laugh at it, to think, oh, they're
overreacting. But at the end of the day,
again, not partisan and being objective about it
and looking at this, the track record, what
do we see? We see the things that
they go, oh, you're just falling for the
thing, and then it becomes real. Oh, they're
not really going for Greenland. You guys are
so easy to play. Oh, now we're going
for Greenland. Like,
I mean, it's I'm not an an objective
person can very clearly see that things that
get floated like running for a term that
then kind of borderline become maybe or maybe
become real are not jokes. Even if they
are jokes, if they recognize they might work
and enough people support it, they'll do damn
near anything. And I'm talking about the US
government, not Donald Trump alone. My point in
showing you this, though, is to recognize you
know as well as I and it's already
it's not even a secret. There have been
people and prominent ones who have openly discussed
that Trump should be ruling forever. And I
genuinely mean that, and you know that as
well as I. I'm not saying this represents
everybody, but I use this just to make
a broader point. This person says, me and
my family, we love King Trump. Because you
remember the the protest? I think it's tomorrow
is no kings. And the whole thing is
about, you know, they're trying to make it
a communist uprising, which, you know, maybe it
is, but fact should matter to you. My
point is it's obvious to see that the
US government is benefiting from using our left
right deploys and having Jones and the rest
called us a Chinese communist overtaking or somehow
at the same time a Mexican revolution from
from California or maybe alternatively,
Americans who are mad at ice and they're
breaking the law, you know, whichever one you
wanna play it, all at the same time,
apparently, very Israeli propaganda of you. The reality
is you can clearly see that there's some
of this that is about promoting the idea
that Trump should be able to circumvent the
Supreme Court, should be able because we have
a mandate. You know? They'll understand how these
things work.
But
the bigger picture is that whether it's a
joke or not, that people
float these things, and it just shows you
a sentiment that they do you know, it's
there are people that really do think this.
And, you know, and on the left too,
they would argue, like, the the like, remember
the whole point at the beginning was that
if we allow allow Elon, if we allow
them to win, this there'll never be another
election.
I mean, it's just it's obvious that what
a ridiculous I mean, anything's possible. There was
no evidence to suggest this one was the
last one, but they just needed you to
lean in because they knew this big shift
that was gonna take place. But, obviously,
if Biden was allowed to win, well, that's
the same point. Right? They'll be in there
forever, and many people said good because Trump
was a bad guy. It's obvious that you
know this is a part of it. And
I said a large part of the Republican
base, I'm just making it a point about
right now, it's all paradisins in my opinion,
Has thoroughly lost the plot and are now
cheering on exactly what they said they were
fighting moments ago. Most see it. It's not
new. But important to point out for those
who are not blind followers.
Again,
but and thus feel a bit lost. You're
not alone is the point. I'm sure those
people in that in this and that feel
they're on a certain side that are going,
god. You know, I'm not gonna be on
that side, but I feel kind of isolated
right now from what what I thought was
happening over here. Realize there's more than two
sides, guys. You're not alone. There's a lot
of people out there that have many different
multifaceted opinions. Join the the group the objective
middle ground here of people that actually can
think beyond the partisan lens. It's important to
see that. I just wanted to point that
out. Now lastly, of course, that what I
was already saying, here's Jones on the eleventh.
Think about the timing of all these, guys.
Deep state expert, Noli Wolfs, warns the Democrat
NGO complex is working directly with the CCP
to trigger a violent civil war. Yeah. That's
where this all goes. You've got Lewandowski and
everyone, there was civil war, civil war. Or
if you listen to Jones four days ago,
apparently, we're already in World War three. But
I guess that one's been put down because
it didn't happen even though he swore that
it was there already. Or the Netanyahu and
Trump split and they hate each other except,
oops, that one was wrong too. We'll put
that one down and we'll just lean into
whatever makes you not think, think, see the
most obvious thing happening in the room. I
just can't understand
how people can't see beyond the the nature
of what this is. And I said, of
course.
It's obviously China, guys. Just look around at
all the politicians waving Chinese flags and all
the censorship of those calling out China, and
all The US legislation
that supports arms and protects China, even to
the detriment of Americans.
Or am I missing something?
Silly to me. It's just it's almost cartoonish.
So talking about that, and we're gonna come
back to that point in a later.
This is important to overlap with the Iran
discussion. Again, the point of all that was
two party manipulation and all of a sudden
we have this massive move that I'll show
you very clearly was already planned, that they
were already involved with, that Trump and even
an Israeli report claims at the very least
from times of Israel that Trump was well
aware in the moment he got into power,
they made this plan, which by the way
perfectly lines up with the exact thing we
already talked about, Adelson and the money to
annex the West Bank, the deal of faking
the ceasefire deal so they could take over
Gaza, all of this. And if they did
broke it in the phase, then Trump would
allow them to take x, y, and z.
It all lines up, and I believe this
was part of it. And so the report,
as we'll come back to, is that they
knew this from the beginning, and it was
about lulling Iran into belief that no attack
was coming.
A lot of us were saying this early
because it's very obvious the possibility if you're
simply paying attention.
So massive outages all day yesterday,
and Israel just happens to attack Iran. What
a coincidence. Now it very well could be,
but I think it's worth understanding how crazy
this was in regard to what actually happened.
Now I grabbed this from StreamYard because this
is what I saw, and this is what
they claimed.
Google Cloud Services,
has experienced a global outage that may be
affecting StreamYard. Now it says there were, the
global outage is the point that I think
is important. The so one, get away from
cloud services in my opinion, but realize that
this is a massive thing that affected a
lot.
And
maybe something major was done while all these
things were down, maybe not. Maybe ultimately it
was about trying to hide things. People didn't
stream it. I tried to throw my interview.
It didn't work. So realize that at that
time, people were probably hesitant or maybe it
wasn't even working properly when they could have
been reporting on real time discussions of what
they were doing in Iran. Worth considering. Right?
Now in regard to knowing that they were
involved,
it's actually pretty crazy to see the the
coping going on around this story. Now here's
Jerusalem Post. Israeli official,
there was full and complete coordination with the
Americans. Now I'll be the to point out
that as I've said many times, Israel has
an interest. You know, they always seem to
do that. And that's not always the truth,
you understand.
But weirdly enough, even when they lie about
what The US is doing or how they're
involved because it makes them look like they're
controlling The US,
most often, The US doesn't doesn't correct it,
doesn't even talk about it, which I think
proves my point. But my point is to
say that that doesn't prove it's real. They
could say they would say that just to
get the fee the impression to the world
that they're able to manipulate The US that
easily. But I'm of the mind, this is
very obviously the case, that they were fully
and completely involved, and I'm gonna get to
the point where Trump seems to be admitting
that publicly.
But I said a lot of coping going
on. Partisans will manufacture whatever story makes their
chosen ideologue look how they prefer.
Not a peace president, guys. That's not what
that looks like. Israeli and and, you know,
they're full and complete coordination with the Americans.
And I think I have all these lined
up in here too.
I believe so.
Just I did it on a thread just
in case people wanna see it. But oh,
and I'll point out, by the way,
I mean, I've been pointing out the very,
very obvious suppression on this platform and plenty
of others in this on this or on
this on my account and plenty of those
on this platform.
But I I'm I'm not trying to make
it more because
look for yourself. Look at the engagement of
this account from yesterday to today or just
the last it's kind of insane. I mean,
look at this, guys. These things are pinned.
I mean, we're it's just kinda crazy. Look
at the views. 495?
Because if you're gonna pretend that content is
not actually engaged with because it's not good,
you would see views. You wouldn't see likes
and retweets.
If you're gonna pretend that I kept with
75,000
people following this account, that I get 495
people even seeing it, and you think that
makes sense,
I I mean, I got a bridge to
tell you. Very clearly, that is dramatic suppression.
And why do you think that is? Because
we're walking through an Israeli manipulated platform that
you if you can deny that today, I
don't even know how you're I mean, that
is one of the most obvious things of
this conversation from c from CHEQ,
from from,
Autentix
and Netanyahu and and and Elon Musk. I
mean, or ADL with Yacarino.
It's wildly obvious. And now even more so
that people like us talking about things right
now that contradict the partisan narrative
are being dramatically
suppressed.
Oh, wait. Did I finish reading that?
Yeah. I did. Okay. And now Michael Tracy
points to a Fox News report, saying Trump
confirms he was aware. Now many people are
immediately trying to go, well, he's saying that
not to embarrass himself,
which is so interesting to me. So you're
willing to say that he's dishonest as long
as it makes him not the immediate culprit,
which is kind of the longer point. As
I said, well, yeah. If you're so he's
been lying to you, can't you consider that
the others were lies? No. No. No. No.
Not that. But this one was. So the
point is he's lying about being involved because
he doesn't want to seem like he wasn't
involved. So he's petty. He's dishonest.
Like, how was that the better end? It's
so strange to me. But the evidence is
clearly now showing that he was involved. So
my point on top of that is that
people that support him will manufacture, like I
said, whatever seems to make it all make
sense for their picture
before having any facts. That's alarming. Now he
says Trump confirms he was aware of the
strikes in advance and says he hopes this
will bring Iran back to the negotiating table.
This is my point from the very beginning.
What did I tell you?
They will this is they will not bend
to
negotiations at the at the barrel of a
gun. And they've said this very clearly,
and they don't want it is the point.
Israel does not want Iran to come to
the table. They want conflict so they can
take advantage of it. And so Trump acting
like, do what we say or you're gonna
be bombed and acting like that's they're not
negotiating with us. Again, it's just childish, and
honest people can see that that was never
designed to cause an actual deal. But what's
important is as this bombing was taking place,
they were they were under the illusion of
a deal.
They were under the mind that they were
working on some kind of a deal. And
in the midst of that potential deal, even
if whether genuinely sought or not, Israel bombs
Iran, which by the way is not even
the or time that exact circumstance has taken
place.
But let's all keep pretending like this is
some in, you know, the corporate media, the
way they grapple with these stories, like, we
haven't seen this exact thing before, is always
childish and kinda comical if it wasn't so
serious. But it says we officially
we're officially through the looking glass. He says
bombing their nuclear facilities and killing their leadership
just a gentle prod to keep negotiating. It's
insane. Now whether or not I'm I'm sure
you might in real time, there might be
stuff developing that they actually killed the leadership
they claim, that's why I'm not really gonna
get into it today. They get caught lying
about that stuff all the time or just
projecting what they want you to think happened.
Often enough, like like bad daddy, for example,
they'll say we got him and seven times
later they do the same thing. We got
him. No. He shows back up later. We
got him. Who knows?
If we can confirm that in some way,
I will tell you when we find out.
But then on top of that,
the nuclear facilities we'll get into the point
about whether we're actually talking about
nuclear bomb facilities or nuclear civilian facilities, which
very much matter. And either way, doesn't that
seem a little bit dangerous? It does. But
they don't care. But here's what Fox News
had to say.
I see. I just spoke to,
president Trump.
One thing, you know, the president was aware
of,
Israel's action,
before
it it happened. There were no surprises here,
but he gave me a quote. I will
say one thing.
It it is fair to point out that
that is what I might expect, especially from
Israel, by the way, that they don't wanna
look stupid. And so the lie would make
sense in a logical perspective to say, you
don't wanna look like you're that easily manipulated,
so you'll lie about it. But my point
is the evidence
very clearly
points to that they were involved from day
one. So and and on top of that,
the people will then, like, make that narrative
up without knowing for sure because they just
wanna give them a pass. But it's clear
they're involved in my opinion. He said Iran
cannot have a nuclear bomb. We're hoping to
get back to the negotiating table. We'll see
there are several people
in leadership in Iran that will not be
coming back. And realize as the time we've
had this conversation, that according to everything, including
the state department, including previous
International Atomic Energy Agency investigations before the recent
skirt back and I'll get to in a
minute,
all of them consistently pointed out they are
not seeking nuclear weapon. That's not to say
that they're not, but this is being objective.
Who knows? Maybe there's a secret something going
on somewhere. But realize they've they've claimed for
a long time, and Robert's been expertly talking
about this forever, that they of their from
the leadership, their mind is that's an a
religious violation to them. And so the bottom
line is they've said we're not going to,
and the evidence backs that up, but it's
not to say we know for sure. So
all you have is the insinuation from Israel,
we'll get to in a minute, for
fifty years continuing to tell you they're four
months away, they're thirty seconds away, and then
never having that happen. Not because something took
place that stopped it, but just because they
wait and come back to it later. And
you have the grams of the world, the
trumps of the world, everybody else, all of
his Zionist cabinet just blindly regurgitating the exact
narrative despite the evidence of even the US
government state department saying that's not the reality.
It just doesn't change.
Now the president
I know has spoken to,
prime minister Netanyahu
several times in recent days.
The as I mentioned before, the Trump administration
reached out to a key Middle Eastern ally,
beforehand
to acknowledge this strike was gonna happen,
but that US was not involved,
in the strike, but the goal still That
also appears to be false. To get Iran
back to the negotiating table. There's was this
building frustration about what Iran was doing at
that negotiating table with Steve Witkoff, the Middle
East envoy.
He was scheduled again for Sunday.
Looks like,
obviously, that may change the dynamic there whether
that
Oh, I think I was muted. My point
about Witkoff was simply that
he appears to have been on Iran's, Israel's
side from day one. We'll get to that
in a which doesn't surprise anybody, I'd imagine.
Who swore it at all. Depends on what
Iran does in response.
There the president told me he's, you know,
looking to see what the retaliation
may be.
CENTCOM is on high alert.
The US will defend
its,
will help defend Israel
if if needed.
Why? Why? If they're not involved, then why
are they helping defend? I mean, it's it's
obvious to see how this plays out. And
to recognize that even though they have an
based on their own narratives,
Iran has, like, the textbook example of being
able to respond, but they're already calling it
terrorism and saying, you know, you should not
respond. There's no like, everything from from Vonderland
to every
leader of a country ruler, they're all coming
out and saying, if you respond, it'll be
terrorism.
Just again, a child could see the the
contradiction in that logic. And as I mentioned
in the last time we talked,
you know, the Iron Dome has been replenished,
in Israel,
in recent weeks.
Yeah. I mean, you know my opinions. I
thought that that is facade. That is a
straight up manipulation. I don't believe that even
functions the way we think it does, but
that's people disagree with me. I mean, the
evidence is ridiculous to see how often I
mean, Robert and I have had conversations, and
he does agree that there's something off, but
he doesn't fully agree with the way I
see it, which is important to consider. He
I I bow to him on lot of
on all this stuff, but
there's so much evidence that this is a
like, almost like a money laundering operation. Just
like it's a lie. It doesn't do it's
not successful the way they claim it is.
And every time we see an example like
from Yemen, it or right now, it doesn't
seem to actually stop what they claim. I
I mean or you can go to the
point that Golan Heights where it seems to
almost be used almost, in, quote, accidentally, but
seems almost deliberately to claim to fire at
something and have the bomb fly back down
and bomb the people in the Druze community,
which has happened more than once.
So there there's still this hope,
in the president's,
sense and the people around him,
that this changes the dynamic,
for Iran and that this does not
launch into what will be a back and
But we just saw And
the only thing that will stop that is
if Iran shows restraint, which it almost always
does in this exact kind of dynamic. Same
thing we saw with Syria and Russia. That's
not the same as saying good guy, bad
guy. It's just showing you people that understand
the reality of the situation, and that's why
it behooves not I shouldn't say it like
that, but in their minds,
Israel and The United States to constantly be
belligerent because that showed people like that that
if you do even what's legally required or
allowed, we will go back 20 times harder.
And then again and again and again and
then claim you're the terrorist, and they know
that, and the world knows that. And so
what it does is causes these kind you
know, right now,
they know that it's it's a calculation. If
they respond, which they have a right to,
in a way that's which we'll get to
in a minute, it seems they're bombing inside
of Israel and bombing Tel Aviv,
then they hope, I would argue, that the
world recognizes and and steps in, which I
find hard to believe with all the statements
that we support Israel, and acknowledge that that
was a legal response.
Problem is that doesn't seem to be where
it goes. So it's that it's that weighing
of whether they just because it but if
they don't respond, they look really weak to
their own people, to the world, and it
probably gets taken then Israel probably takes more
advantage of them. Right? That's that's kind of
the calculation right now, which is probably pretty
difficult. The post from,
the supreme leader,
saying that this is,
the beginning of a major major retaliation,
and that Israel, in his words, has sealed
its fate.
US officials are confirming
to us that a number of top Iranian
officials,
leaders are dead
after these strikes. So they claim, but I'm
gonna wait for more more confirmation because they
lie about everything.
But so what's interesting is to see you
know, so where where does it go from
here? I mean, obviously,
the
this could escalate in very obvious ways.
I just I I get the sense that
this will be a response probably why The
US already moved its troops out of Iraq.
Yes. They did the day before yesterday because
they didn't know. You know? Obviously, they did.
And I bet you that's giving Iran the
clearance. Maybe there was an agreement, which happens
before, to bomb Iraq and claim you know,
the claim we're bombing your installation. Trump will
cry foul. Nothing will happen.
Maybe maybe there's more coordinate. I mean, as
Brad Miller will rightly ask, you know, are
there elements inside Iran that are simply adhering
to some larger globalist ideology and they're taking
direction because this is all theater. Very much
worth your time to consider.
But, you know, we have to engage what
we can prove. Right? And the point is
that the the back and in past is
used to deescalate, but then Israel takes advantage
of it like it done before.
But interesting to consider that.
Now we have this clip or rather this
oh, that's right. I put this This is,
Express News breaking down a plan, which we'll
show you on,
Times of Israel and others. Netanyahu planned to
attack Iran and signed the war plan immediately
after Trump's election or selection,
which is exactly what we've expected. Whether whether
it's the plan for Gaza I mean, guys,
they've
they discussed what this would be and the
rest of it's been theater. And they're basically
starting to admit that to you. Israel worked
to mislead Iran about the timing of its
air strikes, but a comment by Donald Trump
nearly alerted Tehran. Two hours before the attack,
Trump issued a calming message, which helped Iran
lower its guard, allowing Israel to strike by
surprise or how that's how they're framing it
anyway. Though the Israeli cabinet
meeting was said to focus on a hostage
deal, it was actually held to per approve
the attack. Israel then launched air strikes across
Iran, killing top military leaders and hitting key
nuclear missile sites. The plan has been signed
off by Netanyahu after Trump's election win. Now
the idea
of, you know, the the
hold on. I'll come back to that. The
plan is it has been signed by Netanyahu
right after Trump's election win, US backed, ranging
from passive support to active help. Despite leaks
that nearly exposed the operation, the final decision
was approved on June 2. Most Israeli political
leaders, including ultraorthodox party heads, were left unaware,
but that's all their framing of it. So
consider that. But I think the idea of
where this goes, you know, is that Iran
you know, the the targeting location of where
they attack is gonna make all the difference
in the response. And since they've already bombed
in Tel Aviv, I I get the sense
this is not gonna end quickly,
which is bad for everybody.
Now here's the from Israel reporting channel twelve,
the topic of the cabinet meeting in Trump's
message, the course of Israel's fraud. I mean,
there it it it's how that's how Iran
was surprised. It's all about the same conversation.
It's public. But, you you know, the reporting
of Israeli reporting of what they're doing never
seems to influence the left right paradigm coverage
of what they say Israel's doing in this
country, which is confounding.
But here's the actual Times visual report, US
helped lull
Iran into belief no attack was imminent.
It's very clear. But, again, that's how they're
framing it. Now Trump confirmed on eleventh
The US personnel being moved from parts of
the Middle East. I mean, you don't I
mean, it's certainly you could argue that he
felt that something might be happening,
but you realize they've been building up to
this. They've been floating this idea. The days
before, it was like this, everyone's going, we
think something's gonna happen. It's not like they're
psychic guys. They're giving you the indication. They
want you to and this is a very
clear example of how they knew
that this is I'm this is that not
only an attack was gonna happen, but ultimately,
response. And I get the sense they're setting
it up for an easy retaliation,
which will benefit them. But clearly, that's Iran's
always showing you in this dynamic that they
have more restraint than the belligerent actors that
we're dealing with. Again, that's not good or
bad. It's just being logical to understand that
if you keep going this direction, Israel will
always double down. And, again, that's their tactic.
And, again, that's why a lot of these
Americans supporting MAGA and what Trump, the might
makes right, that's what they're pointing to. And
they're not wrong in the logic of how
it makes you win.
But, see, that's of the mindset of just
winning over all else. Most of us don't
care about winning and living over the ashes.
You see, that's the mindset of people that
are just belligerently about team sport politics.
But
Glenn points out what Zsquirrel said, and he's
right. He was way ahead of this.
This account, Zisquirrel, is a prophet, he says,
when virtually everyone, except us though, we said
the same thing, believed there was some
basically, a split between Trump and Netanyahu.
Trump and it was and and said and
Trump was determined to prevent Israel from bombing
Iran, the claim anyway, only to now learn
that the whole thing was a ruse. Well,
you guys remember, I never once bought that
story, and I've been very clearly pointing out
the obvious indication that it was never true.
And as I simply pointed out, and this
is Axios reporting that Trump was publicly pretending
to oppose the attack on Iran. That that
seems to be coming from every angle right
now. And I simply said, so Alex Jones
was wrong?
You get the point. Hoping people can read
into the larger point of not just this
one example, but how often that comes to
pass. But we talked about this. Right? He
came out and made this big point about
how, we are we called it we called
it. We knew the split was coming, and
here's why.
And like I said, I I understand the
logic of why you could eventually see that
come to pass. I talked about that before
he said he was right about that. The
obvious point of why Netanyahu I sensed, and
I said this before the election, that he
could be the scapegoat. But that's not a
unique opinion. A lot of us say that
because he's wildly unpopular,
and nobody on any side really likes him,
and he's a criminal according to his own
people. And so it's easy to see how
he could be pushed aside and the agenda
can continue. So, you see, if he taps
into things that are, like, already very publicly
being discussed but not really being put a
spotlight on and says, I knew it, but
now he turned out to be wrong because
he stated the fact before it happened because
the agenda
wanted you to think that. And you must
think that either he's played by people that
give him this information or he somehow knows
it'll turn out to be false but doesn't
care that it makes him look stupid. You
guys can decide all of that, but that's
important to understand because they're clearly not splitting
at this point. They're aligned with this agenda.
All of this was around the Iran idea
that they he's fighting Netanyahu to stop the
Iran attack. They have been in line with
this from day one, and that's the important
thing to understand. Here's the censored news, flashback,
asked about this exact conversation.
Says that Israel should not target Iranian
nuke facilities. What are your thoughts on that?
What should Israel respond? I mean, that's the
craziest thing I've ever heard. It's the biggest
risk we have. The biggest risk we have
is nuclear. I mean, to make the statement,
please leave their nuclear alone,
I would To the best of all of
our knowledge and all the facts and all
the evidence, including from the state department, it's
civilian nuclear program for energy.
And not even close to the 90% needed
to make the material needed to make a
nuclear bomb. And they they love to hype
the idea where they're over right away, so
many percentage away.
You have to understand. Again, hear that. Look
at the percentage. Forget where it's at now.
What is it? 60 something, whatever it is.
You need to reach 90 plus percent to
make the material needed to make a nuclear
bomb. That's not something they just snap their
fingers and do. And the only reason they're
increasing enrichment is because they're allowed to buy
the JCPOA
deal that the US Trump administration
violated, And it was textbook. If they do
that, you have the legal right to increase
enrichment until they correct that problem, and they
never did.
And they're still telling you we're not seeking
that, and they very clearly, by the evidence,
continue to show you they're not.
But all that's being said as they continue
to frame it as they are doing so
because that's what Israel keeps saying. Tell you
that that's not the right answer. That was
the craziest answer because you know what? Soon,
they're gonna have nuclear weapons and then you're
gonna have problems. They asked You mean like
every other country including North Korea? What what
about what about all the screening about North
Korea nuclear bomb, then they finally do it,
then they never talk about them again? When's
the last time you even heard about North
Korea?
Is did they suddenly start being a good
guy, or did they just you see the
point? You can't pretend like that was honest.
So if the indication and ask Gaddafi how
that works. If you give up your nuclear
weapons, then they kill you.
Now I'm not sorry to make a case
for good or bad or what with every
I don't want nuclear weapons to be used
or created by these governments, but the reality
of the current
circumstance with Israel being one of the only
not signed on the nuclear proliferation treaty yet
having more nukes than anybody almost,
It's very clear oh, I shouldn't say it
like that, but more than, like, US below
Russia, US, and so on, but more than
most everybody else. The idea being how how
insulting that is. Two of the most belligerent
countries in the world clearly being the most
dangerous with these and yet telling everybody else
they can't, that they don't want to. The
legal reality is everybody has the right to
seek these things as they see fit. They
don't have the unilateral right to say you
can't. And on top of that,
the proliferation treaty, non that was supposed to
be them slowly reducing, and they're not doing
that either. So it's everyone's a violation. It's
just about Mike Nicks' rights today. Bottom line,
the evidence is clear, and what they're trying
to do is convince you to something that
something that isn't happening, as far as I
can tell, is happening to go after this
country. Now, quickly jump ahead. I'll give credit
to the point that comes from Alan McLeod.
Had they had nuclear weapons,
this would not be happening.
Take a to think about that. If they
knew Iran actually had them, then this would
not be happening. So you understand, Israel is
not claiming, like, they that when they need
to, they still sell the they're thirty seconds
away. But, alternatively,
in between the 47 times they've said that
over the last fifty years, they claim they
do, though. They claim they already have they
claim they do have them. And so the
bottom line is if any of this was
true, this would not be happening the way
it was. Important to think about.
What do you think about, what do you
think about Iran? Would you hit Iran? And
he goes,
as long as they don't hit the nuclear
stuff.
That's the thing you wanna hit. Right?
I said, I think he's got that one
wrong. Isn't that the what you're supposed to
hit?
I mean, it's the it's the biggest risk
we have.
Yeah. Not not the same as as risking
bombing a nuclear site because that's not risky.
Right? I mean, see, the whole idea comes
from whether you concern yourselves with people's lives
and civilians, you know, like you always claim
you do. Like, Trump's bad at keeping pretenses
up. Right? You're supposed to pretend that you're
fighting for the freedom of these people against
the bad government,
but they see they've lost that. That's that's
that's, like, not even relevant anymore. But they're
so that's that's supposed to be the claim.
So when you're saying don't do that, that's
because not because Biden didn't want to. I
don't think he's even aware of who's saying
or doesn't care. It's because you're supposed to
pretend that we don't want that fallout. It's
bad for everybody. Right? But they their only
mindset is we gotta stop them because that's
what Israel wants. We have to stop them
because they are the bad guy. Who cares
about the fallout?
Or they're just dangerously incompetent or uninformed. I
mean, I don't know. But the bottom line
is that's obviously why. And they just show
you I mean, that's one thing people say
with Trump. It's just they take the mask
off, guys. We can see the reality, not
him, but of the government, and he is
a perfect actor through that government.
Nuclear weapons. The power of nuclear weapons, the
power of weaponry, but when they asked him
that question, the answer should have been hit
the nuclear
and worry about the rest later. Yeah. So,
remember, this is at a time right now
where they're trying to act like that's not
what Trump wants. It's it's partisanship, guys. They
will ignore whatever it takes. And,
that's why they should that's what they if
they're gonna do it if they're gonna do
it, they're gonna do it, but we'll find
out whatever their plans are. But great question.
Thank you very much. If you were the
final voice in the situation room, would you
support or oppose a preemptive
strike by Israel
on Iran? Now you asked about a preemptive
strike, Margaret, and I wanna answer the question.
Look. It is up to Israel what they
think they need to do to keep their
country safe, and we should support our our
allies wherever they are when they're fighting the
bad guys. Right. Because laws don't matter. It's
whatever they decide is okay for them. I
think that's the right approach to take with
the Israel question.
Why do they all say Israel?
Israel. That's like that's like, Lindsey Graham. I
don't know. I understand. It's weird to me.
But
seems pretty obvious.
These people only care about an agenda. Michael
Tracy says, reminder, Trump openly campaigned on allowing
Israel to bomb Iran so no one can
say they've been blindsided and betrayed. Promises made,
promises kept. Exactly.
Now here is one an important example.
This is Tulsi Gabbard. And just like RK
Jr, Tulsi Gabbard, I think personally,
was used for this very purpose because she
was a convincing
present presenter of
anti war.
Even though it seems that she's not that
or at least that she doesn't care when
it comes to her political career, but at
the end of the day, she sold a
lot of people that this is what Trump
would be, but he's not. But just remembering
that this is what how they tricked you.
For Donald Trump
is a vote for a man who wants
to end wars, not start them.
And then And who has demonstrate
This is why they need you to think
that he didn't he wasn't involved or just
you know, he's just trying to make sense
of the situation. He's the deal maker. No.
They were involved. They were a part of
this, but they need you to get take
whatever low hanging fruit they're providing to convince
yourself that, no. He really was, and he's
just bound by what Israel's been it's not
the truth, guys. They lied to you here,
and I think she knew that. Already
that he has the courage and strength to
stand up and fight for peace.
Clearly not. Will look back on us at
this moment They will. For the choice that
we make. You're damn right there. Did we
choose war Yes. Or peace?
War. Did we choose poverty
or prosperity?
Did we choose censorship
or freedom?
Censorship.
Are we competing?
I mean, that's not my look look around,
guys. There are Republicans calling this stuff out.
President Trump called me after three hours after
a shooting.
And he said, would I come and sit
down with them? And he said to me
during that meeting,
he said there are some things that we
can agree on and some we disagree on,
but the landscapes on which we agree are
so much larger.
He said, I wanna end the wars.
So easy to say things, isn't it?
I wanna end this surveillance
and censorship.
I wanna protect the constitution.
It's it's you could just say whatever you
want, guys. That's what politics is.
Doesn't mean they mean these things. And if
you care about looking at the previous actions,
right, and the precedent and the outcome of
what's now been happening,
then you have to know that's not true.
But none of those things matter to people
that have signed on to a team.
I wanna protect freedom of speech.
Oh, you think that we deserve a president
who's gonna end the warfare state and rebuild
the middle class?
I do need a comment on that. No.
Oh, you want a president
who's gonna put America
Too bad. I I sure would. Yeah. Most
definitely.
Now here's, this I think it's ABC or
no. Good Morning America. Just it's just a
clip just highlighting all these different points, and
this is even corporate media. Of course, the
argument is that's because they hate Trump and
they're trying which they probably do. Doesn't mean
that this is fake, but that's how this
works. If it's come through certain channels, it
gets reflexively dismissed, but I and I do
think that's used quite often. But the point
is he's now responded, and this is from
today,
about what happened, and he's he thinks it's
excellent.
That matters. Actually what president Trump had been
hoping to avoid for weeks. He's been trying
to strike a nuclear deal with Iran and
avoid a broader conflict. In fact You see,
even people that supposedly hate Trump are feeding
you the government line. Right? If they hated
him, they could easily expose that that's never
been the case, but they need to because
this is goes above left and right. It
goes to the government control over your narrative
and you. So what they need to push
is that he was trying super hard, and
now he's you know, that that's
doesn't this clearly indicate to somebody objective that
maybe he never was trying that? Right? And
now if he's okay with it, that means
that he was okay with them bombing the
very group he was in the middle of
negotiating with?
I mean, see, these are this is basic.
These
people do not care, or these are talking
heads, the people pulling their strings, whoever the
the editors above them, whatever, they don't care,
and they'll pushing a narrative for whatever is
guiding them. At just moments before these strikes
overnight, the president had taken to social media
calling for a diplomatic resolution. He had warned
Netanyahu that an attack like this would be
inappropriate.
See? Okay.
Sure. We warn you. And then it happens,
and he goes, good stuff. You're its excellence,
and I'm on board, and I was involved,
and we did.
So he lied to you, guys. That's the
point to take away from it. Those of
you out there that have been buy going
along with him fighting against the Iran war,
he lied to you. He knowingly told you
what you wanted to hear and has now
flipped right into it's all good, and we're
on board. It's excellent. And Iran nuclear missiles
are bad. Okay. Just like we're gonna get
to the immigration point. Telling you every immigrant's
bad. We can't allow this. The scourge of
our country in Miller and Bondi and Nome
just going aggressively and then going, okay. But
all of these ones are okay, though. The
hotels and farms and, you know, and the
500,000
Chinese immigrant visa students, and they can stay
here as long as they want.
I'm not even saying that that's not I'm
not trying to get into good, bad, left,
right. It's about contradictory
hypocrisy and showing you that if you think
you can just trust what they're telling you,
then you haven't been paying attention. And said
it would derail talks, that it would, quote,
blow it. Now just moments ago, the president
speaking with our John Carl said of the
attacks that he thinks it's been excellent. He
said we gave them a chance, and they
didn't take it. They got hit very they
got hit hard. Okay. So understand. We gave
them a chance, which is basically do what
we say or we're gonna bomb you. That
was basically his tactic.
And then they didn't do it. And so
you're you're you're okay with them bombing them
because they didn't agree to what you strong
armed and what you wanted? I mean, think
about how insane that is. And then today,
going, now that they've done that, let's get
back to negotiating.
I mean, nobody believes that makes sense other
than people that are blindly adherent to a
partisan agenda. It's insane, and we all see
it. Time to start calling the stuff out,
guys, because you have fake America firsters driving
you in a very bad direction.
Very hard. They got hit about as hard
as you're going to get hit, and there's
more to come, a lot more. And when
asked if The US participated in the attack
in any way, the president interestingly said, I
don't want to comment on that.
That is so stupid. You know? And you
could argue us because he doesn't you know,
maybe he didn't, and he's now he's caught
off guard. I mean, that's certainly possible he's
trying to cover up that he got played.
But don't you think that if they did
this without them knowing that Trump would call
them out for that, that they that he
got played and used?
You see, because if let's just say that
was the case, it's more important to Trump
to hide that he was the victim than
to be honest with you about what's going
on. But, again, I don't think that's the
reality. I think he was involved from day
one, and they know that.
But no comment allows you to assume whatever
you want. That is not what Marco Rubio
said last night, the secretary of state coming
out very quickly and making it clear that
The US was not involved, saying flatly, let
me be clear, Iran should not target US
interests or personnel because, of course, Iran has
warned that it will retaliate
against The US. Now the president this morning
is set to meet with his national security
council in the Situation Room. And this morning,
he still seems to be holding out hope
that somehow these nuclear talks can be salvaged,
posting just a short while ago urging Tehran
to come to the table saying Iran must
make a deal before there is nothing left,
adding just do it before it is too
late. Nothing. Jordan, we've just once again said
that if you don't negotiate,
we're we're there'll be nothing left. So that's
not negotiation. That's strong arming, guys. That's not
even in the same ballpark. You're pointing a
gun at their head or rather more so
you have, you know, a a baseball bat
to their leg, and you're saying, you keep
oh, you keep saying no. We're gonna keep
it's gonna be more difficult for you. Why
won't you negotiate with us as they're banging
them in the leg? That that's what's happening
right now.
It's just childishly obvious. Let's stop pretending.
Why can't we get past these pretenses? I
can tell you, money, propaganda, influence, control, power.
Same old things.
Very clear.
And
so it's been excellent. He's on board. We
gave them a chance. They didn't take it.
I just who buys this stuff? I just
it's really crazy to me. Now BRICS, again,
one of these, I think, prop these are
propaganda accounts. It's not associated with BRICS in
any way. It says, Justin, US intelligence officials
are increasingly concerned that Israel may strike Iran
without Washington approval,
June 11.
So to make the point to end this
per segment well, actually, just this part of
the segment,
these accounts manipulate you. That's what happens. You
know, it's they're about narrative control.
They've been caught lying about all sorts of
stuff, guys. This is telling you what they
wanted you to think, just like Jones and
all the rest of them. And that was
that they didn't know or they weren't aware
or they're trying to stop their World War
three. We now at there at least he's
telling you now that he was involved. We
do know that there's involvement.
They were just trying to get you to
think that if they bombed because they knew
they were going to, then what The US
was caught off guard because that's what they
want you to think at the moment. Now
we know better, but that won't change.
Now here is what Lindsey Graham and Hegg
says. This is their little theater dance they
did right before this because they wanted you
to have this in your mind before this
took place. I mean, realize how obvious this
all is. He asked them about the the
nuclear weapon conversation. And this I mean, it's
just sad that they keep pushing this, and
it's listen to how flimsy this back and
is.
Well, I'm trying to get everybody to think.
Let's don't do what we did in the
thirties. They're going to use a nuclear weapon
if they get it. Are they trying to
Do you start with this assumptive premise? Like,
you somehow know that. What you the only
group in the world that's ever used them
on innocent people is the United States government.
To act like there there's a precedent there.
They're the ones that have them. All these
different claims and to say that we know
that that's the same idea. That's the other.
That's the dehumanization.
The Iranians are just gross and bad, and
we know they're gonna do the bad thing
if we allow them to have what everyone
else. It's just sad. I mean, this is
inherent. This is either racism. This I mean,
whatever you wanna call it. It's it this
is Lindsey Graham showing you that he's a
disgusting person, or rather willing to do whatever
Israel says for Israel's direction or money or
whatever else, or make a China that makes
it easier for you to absorb. He is
not acting for American interest.
He's using that to make you think there's
a bad thing coming, and he has no
idea. In fact, I don't think it matters.
Build a nuclear weapon versus a peaceful nuclear
power program.
They're going to use a nuclear weapon if
they get it. Are they trying to build
a nuclear weapon versus a peaceful nuclear power
program,
miss secretary? Have the Iranians been trying to
build a nuke? There are plenty of indications
that they have been moving their way towards
something that would look a lot like a
nuclear weapon.
What a are are you kidding me? Think
about that
answer. That that answer means anything.
Anything. Even just let's just say they had
a meeting about one day building that thing.
That would apply to what he just said.
Like, you know, it's just so stupid. And,
of course, Lindsey Graham sets it up with,
you know, exactly what he's telling you. That's
not a question. He's setting the table to
ask the question. This is
a setup and spike. That's what they're doing.
It's shockingly stupid. And, overall, the evidence we
already have been talking about, which they both
know, shows you the opposite is true. As
Michael Tracy points out, the 2025 annual threat
assessment of The US Intelligence Community, quote,
we continue
to assess Iran
is not building a nuclear weapon. I keep
telling you all this. I've shown you 45
times from the state department or the previous
International Atomic Energy Agency investigations.
The reason I'm saying previous, I'll get to
you in a I'll show you why in
a There's an interesting development there. But my
god, if this is all we're acting on,
you think about how many people's lives at
risk are the the innocent children they just
murdered in Iran, which I'll show you. It's
the image we use today
because of that. Because Israel is clearly puppeteering
people like Lindsey Graham. That's my opinion, but
I think it's quite frankly obvious. And here's
what Tom Cotton had to say after that
little exchange. He says
okay. That and even I mean, this is
so embarrassing for these people. Even Twitter is
fact checking them. I didn't see this till
just now. He says this is Tom Cotton.
Clearly, a Zionist influence funded to the teeth
by AIPAC. He says, today, Seg Hegseth confirmed
confirmed
that Iran's terrorist regime is actively working towards
a nuclear weapon for the for the sake
of national security, the security of our allies,
and millions of civilians except the ones that
you just murdered. Right?
This cannot be allowed. And it says right
there, Hegseth did not say this.
I mean, hey. Here, I'll read it to
you again. We continue to assess Iran is
not building a nuclear weapon, says the US
intelligence community.
And here's what Aaron Mate said. Hegseth did
not confirm that. He made the nonsensical claim
that Iran is, quote, moving their way towards
something that would look a lot like a
nuclear weapon. What in the hell does that
mean? And he goes, what does it mean
to look a lot like a nuclear weapon?
It means nothing. Hegseth said that to offer
the fodder for warmongers at a time when
US Intel's
Intel's actual assessment per the DNI is exactly
what we just told you.
No
continue to assess no nuclear weapon. Now, that
doesn't mean we have to that you could
we should question that like everything else. The
point is there's no evidence to prove what
they're saying, and yet they've been saying it
for fifty years. A little less than that,
I think. Yeah. Netanyahu's this is just from
'92 forward, and it's been before that. This
United States Of Israel account, it says Netanyahu's
Iran nuclear bomb claims
timeline since 1992.
I mean, really take a to absorb this,
guys. From 1992, Iran is three to five
years away from nuclear capability.
1993, Iran's pursuing nuclear weapons close to capability.
1995,
Iran is three to five years away, same
thing. 1996. Iran's nuclear acquisition
could be catastrophic. Deadline extremely close. 1996.
'19 02/2003.
Iran's nuclear program is a global threat. 02/2004.
Iran's aggressively pursuing nuclear weapons. 02/2005. Iran's nuclear
emissions must be stopped. On and on and
on. And you understand, most of these examples,
there wasn't some action taking. There wasn't an
invasion. There wasn't some kind of suppressive action
taken to stop their growth. They just say
these things,
and then the time passes
and nothing happens.
I mean, it's and and I have to
understand, guys, they've been caught even by the
IE the International Atomic Energy Agency of the
past. And don't forget, I'm of the mind
that Amano, the Japanese lee director before,
was killed. That's my personal opinion based on
the facts around the idea that he was
he had some rapid turbo cancer. And there
was there was indication that he thought they
were going to kill him anyway. The point
is he was being pressured to say what
they wanted. The evidence continued to show you
that they were not.
And the point being, where was I going
with that? The,
I was saying something else, I never lost
it. But so the point is on and
on, they continue to do this. Year after
year after year, continue to say it. Like
I said, there was no action taken. They
just didn't do so.
And yet they keep pushing this idea. They
continue to hype this. Every year, Iran could
produce it within a year. That's 02/2008.
02/2013, Iran continued a nuclear program. 02/2021, Iran
closer than ever to nuclear weapons. I mean,
just think about how embarrassing this is, and
yet it continues. How many oh, that was
what I was gonna say. It's the the
International Atomic Energy Agency and others have called
Netanyahu out for publicly
faking information.
Whether that
bomb graph he used, like the coyote with
a red pen or that wall of CD
ROMs he put up that turned out was
all old information that wasn't even relevant to
what he was saying. This was all exposed.
It doesn't matter though because it gets the
moron like Lindsey Graham screaming whatever they want
them to.
Now Abby Martin says, because you realize they
acclaim at the very least to kill some
of their leadership,
But they've been murdering Iranian scientists for a
really long time, and no one seems to
care. Regardless of whether they are seeking nuclear
weapons, that's still a dramatically large war crime.
It just never matters. Israel has assassinated scientists
for in Iran for years, she writes, while
media justified it by lying about their nuclear
program, which I argue still wouldn't change the
legal reality of executing a scientist without a
declaration of war. I mean, it's just so
transparent how dishonest all this is. And she
says US, Israel are the nuclear armed aggressors
trying to provoke war. Iran has the right
to defend itself but has shown enormous restraint
so far, which is
you could look for yourself.
Whatever horrors ensue, The United States is to
blame for holding the world hostage and plunging
us into the abyss. I agree. Now Max
Blumenthal points out,
just days after Iran accused and we pointed
to this before, accused the International Atomic Energy
Agency
of furnishing the identities
of high level nuclear scientists to Israel. Think
about this.
Days before this,
Iran was saying they just gave our information
of our person, our scientists, and and and
overlapping points about their nuclear the the civilian
nuclear discussion to
Israel.
Now, again, I say it like that because
that's what the facts show, but you could
argue it's more than that. That's not the
point, though. It's the point about whether they
were giving this information through an international channel
that's supposed to be the independent mediator or
the independent investigator
that relayed person information that then got them
killed if you believe that what they're reporting,
which then needs to backwardly show you that
they're not independent.
They are not investigating
legitimately. So the point is they are lying
to you, and it's a larger construct. And
that's the point in the beginning about Israel
influencing all of these things.
And it says,
I'll say it again. Just days after Iran
has accused the IAEA
of furnishing the identities of high new level
nuclear scientist to Israel intelligence and after leaking
documents showing secret coordination between Israel officials and
the IAEA director.
More assassinations.
Nuclear scientists. Now this is, being reported. Mohammed
Mehdi
Tehrani, and, that's look. Last name Abbasi were
assassinated in these attacks. That's the reporting anyway.
Nuclear scientists, guys. You could argue that they're
inherently evil because they're Iranian and they're working
on something The US doesn't like, but that'd
be pretty dumb to say seeing as how
that's just a
lens being put over. I mean, these are
people with families and jobs and dreams. And,
I mean, you know, the idea that we
just make them evil villains sort of like
the immigration conversation because that suits a need
is quite disgusting.
Now the cradle points this out. These are
the leaked documents from before. This came out.
This is on the twelfth.
Leaked documents released by Iranian media reportedly revealed
that the IAEA
chief has been fully coordinating with Israel and
carrying out its directives.
Surprise, surprise. Which why they get people out
of the way that don't tow the line.
It says these files are part of an
a sensitive intelligence cache that Iran seized from
Israel.
Now let's talk about
well, this so this was kind of a
this is an important part about the Trump
statements
and the way that it's, you know, kind
of overlapping two different things with this and
the immigration point. It does look like we're
gonna have some time to get to that.
I'm just making sure I'm not gonna have
to change the title. But so this is
Matt Gaetz
saying Trump so clearly wants peace.
I simply said this government is so clearly
controlled,
and he he posted the truth social. I
gave Iran chance after chance to make a
deal.
I told which, again, the idea that they're
for so if you're being forced to make
a deal or they're gonna bomb you, then
you're not negotiating.
Now it says, I told them in the
strongest words to just do it. What does
that even mean? But no matter how hard
they tried, no matter how close they got,
they just wouldn't get it done.
I just you know, I I don't understand.
If you cannot like, if if your mind
is that they have to do what they're
told, then you can acknowledge yourself this is
not a negotiation.
If they are they are allowed to push
back and say, if you understand the way
this is going from day one, and actually,
I'll I'll show you that right now since
we mentioned earlier.
Or was that? Some weird points we're gonna
get to. This Witkoff point, as Patrick says,
it's now clear. We were lied to. Steve
Witcoff was not meant to be a peace
envoy. He has been embedded in the Israeli
with the by the Israelis to order the
sabotage and any personal
to and in order to sabotage any peaceful
resolution and create a fiat a comp a
company that steers The US directly into a
war with Iran on behalf of Israel. And
you can listen to it. It's about four
minutes long. Steve Witkoff declares a nuclear Iran
as an existential threat. See how this plays
out, guys? From the eleventh, right before. Right
before.
This is the guy supposed to be negotiating
a deal? I mean, it's just
Israel is infiltrating this government, all these apparatuses
out there to manipulate these outcomes.
And he comes out and says, they just
wouldn't get it done. No. They recognized you
guys were strong arming them and they wouldn't
be forced into a deal, whatever you think
about them. But it goes on to say,
I told them it would be much worse
than anything they know. See? So you threatened
them. If you don't do what we want,
then we will do things worse.
Stilly. And it says that they The United
States makes the best and most lethal military
equipment anywhere in the world. Threats. Threats.
And it says, and that Israel has a
lot of it. Obvious.
With much more to come, and they know
how to use it. Certainly, Iranian hardliners spoke
bravely, but they didn't know what that was
about to happen. They are all dead now,
he says. This is on the thirteenth.
He says, what happened? They are all dead
now and it will only get worse.
There are there there has already been great
death and destruction, but there is still time
to make this slaughter with this next already
planned attacks being even more brutal to come
to an end. Guys, he's openly, openly telling
you more bombings of innocent people in this
country, or if you wanna pretend it was
all nuclear scientists, illegal attacks. There's no war
declared. There's no evidence of what they're claiming.
He's saying, we will continue to destroy your
country unless you make a deal.
We we can't be this silly. We can't
be this childish. It's obvious what this is.
And as Dave DeCamp rightly points out, as
I suspected, Trump didn't get dragged into anything.
That was the narrative, and he goes he
should be impeached. I mean, look. I agree.
But let's not pretend like it's unique now.
Biden shouldn't impeach. So do I mean, all
of them. They're all war criminals.
A 100 ways over, they're showing you they
don't care about the things that are foundational
to this country.
Now same same post. I gave Iran chance
of chance. Dan Cohen says, instead of blaming
Israel for attacking amid US Iran negotiations,
Trump blames Iran. I mean, really take a
objectively and think about that. They're in the
middle of negotiating. Israel bombs them and Trump
sides with Israel. How does that not show
you everything you need to see?
The reasonable explanation is that the talks were
intended to create doubt in Tehran and provide
cover for Israel to attack. Not the time,
by the way. The Trump administration is chock
full of swindlers, double talkers, and neocons and
cannot be trusted. And it's not just now.
Remember during the the Yemen discussion, both Biden
and Trump?
Over and over, they were trying to tell
you that there was deals being made and
Saudis and, yeah, the and the Houthis need
to make deals. And every time the Houthis
stopped, Saudis would rush in and take more
territory. That happened, like, three times as far
as I can remember. And then The US
would say the Houthis broke the deal. It's
just like you're seeing in Gaza, just like
you're seeing here. These are not honest people.
He goes, it lied to Hamas to secure
Eid and Alexander's release. It continues to arm
Ukraine while blaming Russia. Iran's survival is at
stake. There can be no doubt about The
US and Israel's goal of the of the
neocolonial
subjugation of Iran and genocide. Like in Gaza
and Syria, Russia and China must take note
and act accordingly.
And Witkoff, obviously, being a part of this.
Michael Tracy points out to that same post,
pundits and influencers last night. Israel's made a
mockery of The USA.
This is the embarrassing nature of corporate and
mainstream alternative media. This is deliberate sabotage
of Trump. Netanyahu must
pay Jones and all the rest. All of
them.
Trump within hours takes credit for the war.
Trump can always be relied upon to swiftly
humiliate his most diluted and sycophant boosters.
Not unique to partisanship. Now I wanna play
this as well.
Very, very interesting where this goes. Before we
play that
oh, actually, I'll come back to that. Actually,
I'll I'll play it after here.
I wanna play a clip that I think
is important to add to this, which you
guys have probably seen a million times over.
But so this I'll play these clips for
you. This is an important overlap to all
this. This I mean, you this this you
could argue this could be its own show
in a different context, but because it's on
the back of Iran and Israel, I think
it's worth our time to consider. As Raubal
Rauser points out, deepfake technology does one thing.
We are not thinking about written history.
He says, how how are people in five
years going to discern
that the video I'm about to show you
is fake?
While in the current moment, these digital, quote,
jokes are being sent and reposted and liked
and to millions of followers in an instant
without scrutiny. Now in no way am I
saying they should be censoring because of this.
That's probably how this works. Probably using this
dangerous thing to justify censoring what they claim
are deep fakes, which then just become the
new hate speech or whatever it is to
justify censoring who they don't want or don't
like. But this Maverick Alexander account is spreading
things that are, I mean, damn I mean,
I noticed them because I'm looking for it,
but I don't know whether I would have
noticed these were fake if I hadn't seen
it. Here's the one. And even now, they
are saying, at least in this one, this
that it is fake. It's AI. But he
goes, Trump just unlocked a new category of
unfiltered. Feels like 2,016 on steroids. No indication
that this was fake, except now that it's
being checked. Here's what he says. Now watch
this, guys, and consider the implications for what
this means for media and where it goes
as his point. What happens in ten years
from now when this is circulating and has
been shared by people like Alex Jones and
when you look back
and you're going, woah, I mean,
they'll be like we said, what becomes truth
when they will, regardless, say that's true? And
if you show them it's fake, they'll go,
no. That was the me lie to cover
it up. Truth is whatever they decide it
is. And that's the kind of post truth
world talking about Bilderberg, by the way. Make
sure you're checking out Dan Dixon, his work
in there. I'm hoping to interview him about
his catching people like Peter Thiel, even though
everyone online shared it, taking credit for Dan's
work. And he so crazy how today works.
But check out his work. He's doing good
work in covering what's going on in Bilderberg.
My point though is that very clearly
the post truth world was an old talking
point for these meetings.
I, you know, I think this has been
going on a long time, and I think
it's already they've probably already changed things in,
like, you know, whatever you wanna call the,
you know, Library of Alexander, the the the
digital version of this that we don't even
know. Like, things that we all actually think
are real, that we all collected and looked
at are fake. I believe we're already there.
Check this out.
Don't rape themselves
as far as I understand.
Somebody's doing the raping.
But we're currently in the middle of a
national crime wave.
29,000,000
illegals in the past four years
is 29,000,000
felonies.
Certain parties
have
benefited from these crimes from a financial standpoint,
which means we have grounds
for the largest RICO case in American history.
RICO. RICO case.
That's what it's called.
There is a criminal organization working within our
government as well as the private sector that
makes the
RICO pursuits against the mob
look like child's play. I've got two words
for
anyone who's been mucking up the country on
purpose.
Death penalty.
Now it says that now it says this
at the end. Okay?
But people have cut that out and this
is circulating
and it's being shared. I mean, that's really
hard to tell the difference. And this is
my point, guys. This stuff,
you you can you could do people could
download apps for basically nothing that do things
that are damn near hard to tell. And
that's that's just average. Imagine what the military
and what the US government is doing, what
other governments, what Israel's doing. It's probably way
beyond what we can even imagine.
That's really hard to tell. Here's another one.
Now this one doesn't have any notation on
it.
Right? Now at the same point, but this
one doesn't have anything beneath it. People are
looking at this and thinking this is real.
And it says Trump finally breaks his silence
on Israel and Iran.
Should skip it. I don't know. I'm just
not really feeling it. World War three folks,
hard pass. We've got enough going on stateside.
We've got the no kings riots set to
kick off this weekend. No kings. We like
kings, actually, folks. We like one king in
particular, quite frankly. The king of kings, our
lord and savior. I don't know. Maybe you've
heard of him.
With that being said, god bless, good night,
and good luck.
I think we Same point. You'll find these
things circulating with that not on it.
I think that's pretty concerning. Now we're we're
gonna come back to that as, you know,
we'll have more conversations about the IAI overlap
and all that. I'm gonna touch it pointly
at at the end if I have time,
but more in-depth. But
that's pretty insane.
And again, remember, that's some guy with an
app, you know, not what the US intelligence
is actually producing. Now I'll include this kind
of ongoing,
thread from New York Times about what's going
on. Israel strikes targeted. And one of the
points I just wanted to show you, I
believe, was down here.
Unless it's up, actually.
This is really just for you to read
through is Trump warns Iran to reach a
nuclear deal before there's nothing left. Same point.
I already read that. Actually, I've included it
in the in the the post, but just
recognizing how obvious that is. And I'll include
this in general for you. The point is
Iran reels from Israeli strikes on nuclear sites
and top officials, but we'll wait for more
follow-up because they right now, as you well
know, the independent rather mainstream alternative media and
the corporate media seem to just blindly regurgitate
what Israel says and will act like we
have to verify, which we should verify all
things of only what one side puts forward.
My point is that these platforms will just
post what they say, rarely with usually without
even adding just Israel says. So keep that
in mind as this develops forward. Here is
what the press TV platform posted, and it's
just to consider from what, you know, you
could argue the more Iranian platform is saying,
Israeli terrorism against Iran's military commanders, scientists, bears
Western Hallmark. So right there, you can argue
that at least this platform is also pointing
to the people that were killed. But it
says the the genocidal Israeli regime launched an
all out war on the Islamic Republic Of
Iran on Friday, June 13. And brazen contravention
of international law, which is the case, regardless
of if everything they say is true, that
would still be a crime. Ask anyone who's
actually nonpartisan and honest about the legal realities
of international law and US law, by the
way, or rather in the context of The
US being involved, but I guess that's not
the
because that's a dispute. Leave that aside.
But it
says, amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza. And
it says, it bombed Iran's nuclear civilian infrastructure
and assassinated some veteran nuclear scientists as well
as high ranking military commanders in indiscriminate attacks.
Western countries have again refused to condemn these
unlawful and barbaric actions by the Israeli regime
led by war criminal Netanyahu who claims to
be launching this war on behalf of the
civilized West against barbaric Muslims.
Sounds like Laura Laura Loomer talking right there.
It says the reaction of Western countries indicates
that they have no commitment to international
law. You know this. Or any concern for
the lives of Muslims from Palestine to Iran
to Yemen.
The bottom line too is that
when when you, the international law point, Israel
has made it clear directly from the Knesset
more than once that they don't believe the
international law binds them. They believe they can
legislate anywhere in the world. It's a direct
quote from what they said in front of
I mean, this was publicly discussed. It became
international point for a moment, but it gets
put aside for the same reason people ignore
it today. The point is they made it
clear. We can do what we want wherever
we want, whenever we want.
And they've tripled down on that. That's why
it's just so crazy for people like us
to try to get this in front of
people and yet there's some weirdly reason doesn't
ever really get in the conversation. But you
know why.
And it says, they urge Iran to show
restraint but refuse to call out the unlawful
actions of the Israeli regime.
And that's just, oh, that's just the New
York Times article right there. Iran vows to
retaliate as Israel strikes nuclear sites. So Iran
has at least what we can see has
already begun. So let's give you some of
these points.
Robert
reporting yesterday,
Israeli airstrikes on Tehran reportedly killed a large
number of civilians. Here is an alleged image
of one of the little Iranian children murdered
still waiting for an official death toll.
Here is a clip from breaking points,
and this is in regard to the civilian
death toll. Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran targeted
civilians sleeping in their apartment buildings with their
families according to these reports.
They killed children. By any standard, this was
an act of terrorism and a clear violation
of international law. Now the fact that anybody
could push back on that being possible while
while you're literally watching them just execute children
in real time in multiple other locations
shows you the the dishonesty of this whole
conversation. But this is what's happening. Now whether
you think they got the scientists and knew
everything else,
this was a massive attack that killed innocent
people. The there's real time social media evidence
coming out. There's people that are on the
ground investigating. No question at all. Right? But
what we have in front of us very
clearly shows you that's part of this.
But I think also there's something very important
here to mention.
We've seen that they've been targeting apartment building
similar to what they have done in Beirut,
what they have done, of course, in Gaza
in a much, much larger scale. What we've
seen is that over the course of the
last two years, but also before that, the
Israelis have,
run a campaign to essentially eliminate
all of the norms around the use of
force that have been developed
over time, but particularly after the second World
War to eliminate all international law.
Because
what they're doing here is that they're going
after civilians and military officials, but they're doing
so not on the battlefield. They're not doing
so in the barracks. They're doing it in
their homes when they're asleep together with their
children and families as well as scores of
other families in the same apartment building.
If any other country were to do this
against The United States, meaning that they would
target even military officials, but outside of the
battlefield,
outside of the barracks, but at their homes
together with their families. The United States would
rightfully call that acts of terrorism.
But this is what Israel has normalized. And
I think, again, the Iranians may have underestimated
how far the Israelis were willing to go
to break all kinds of norms when it
comes to warfare.
Which I mean, again, it's it's so verifiable.
It's painful.
Here's another example. And this is about the
confirmation point
as, this is,
Saeed Mohammed Randi. When asked, when you talk
about Israelis, there's no need for all these
confirmations. But when it's Palestinians or Iranians or
Lebanese, everything has to be confirmed, and by
the time they're confirmed, it's all over. And
that's not to suggest we should not be
confirming these things. The point is to show
you how blindly they will report whatever Israel
says. And then when it's the other side
around, or when it's not Israel, the point
is that clearly they will act like they
need confirmation but then never really follow-up, like
Matt Miller did for the entire time he
was in in that position, acting like they
have to follow-up, we'll get back to you,
and they just never do because he knows.
And now he's acting like somehow he was
bound by being ordered to lie. He's admitting
that he didn't agree and he lied. It's
just we knew that. We know it now.
So that's my point about most people knowing
where we are, and we're led by a
bunch of screaming partisans that lie that they
they highlight as the conversation. Here's what he
had to say.
On the civilian casualties, it's true that Iran's
state media is reporting civilian casualties. We've not
had confirmation of that at present.
In the meantime, Israel
has said that it's struck I appreciate it.
I any since you haven't confirmed it, anyone
who's watching your program can go to my
Twitter account
and see an image of a young a
child who was murdered in lying dead. We
don't I don't think we,
when you want
to speak on behalf of the Israelis, there's
no need for all these confirmations. But when
it's Palestinians or Iranians or Lebanese, everything has
to be confirmed. And by the time they're
confirmed, it's all over.
Yep. Pretty consistently.
Now I'll include this for you. Mondawai is
justifying land grab. Israel says it is allowed
to ignore international law anywhere it wants. And
that's it's in the context of the West
Bank, but they make a very clear argument
that, look, if we can do this anywhere,
why would why couldn't we take the West
Bank? And they're very clearly arguing that they
are allowed to do what they want wherever
they want. In the Knesset, like, that's in
congress, guys. And look, this despite where, you
know, people go, they're gonna lie. It's this
platform. This this is a great platform, by
the way. The point is it's directly cited
to literal
documents from the Knesset. Like, you can click
all of these and they click they directly
cite from the Knesset legislation. Let me see
if this is the one.
I don't think that's it.
It's in it's all the links are in
here. We are yeah. It's right. We went
through all this in a previous show. It's
directly from their own documents.
And it's very clear. This became a big
point for a while, but, you know, it
doesn't matter. It's just it's insane to watch
how obvious it is that they think they
can do and then we debate whether they're
infiltrating countries when this is the kind of
thing that they say out loud.
Now, Low Ki points out now this is
discussing the people that were killed, children. Today,
we we received the bodies of children aged
four, five, and six years old. That's reports
in Iran from after the bombings. And Low
Ki simply says Israel now adds Iranian children
to the long list of children killed. Fair
point.
Now, of course, right when this took place,
this is on the eleventh or technically right
before, Lumer was immediately jumping in with fake
Israeli talking points. Nothing new.
Massive cyberattacks across the Middle East have started.
Iran is attacking Kuwaiti and Georgia. Okay. So
think about this. Before
before this happens, this is what she's putting
out, and it turns out to be fake?
Nope. They're stable. Didn't happen. Okay. So ask
yourself why this very obvious Zionist manipulator is
out there screaming that Iran's doing evil bad
things before they attack Iran. Do I need
to connect those dots? I think it's pretty
obvious. There's a lot of this going on
out there.
And, of course, here she is, June 13,
explain it to me like I'm five years
old.
Nothing new. How is it not America
to congratulate those who just made sure Islamist
to chant death to America and openly plotted
to assassinate Donald Trump? Oh, they were still
pushing that lie, apparently. Never opportunity to have
a nuke.
So the idea that they were ever gonna
kill or go after Trump was completely broke.
That was a complete facade. Like, that was
very clumsy. We broke it down last time.
And, of course, Jones and the rest were
all pushing the same thing, just like they're
pushing everything now, whatever, use in the moment.
But to argue that what? Bombing innocent people
or whatever scientists in any context, regardless of
whether you have a legal right to is
okay because they say certain things? I thought
you believed in free speech, Laura Loomer. We
see it's only in for insofar as we
can use it for our agenda. These racist,
disgusting, vile people will use what you care
about against you to force in what they
want everywhere you look.
America right, to start a war with a
foreign country that's against American interests that most
Americans don't want.
Maybe you should rethink what you think America
actually means, Laura.
Now Khamenei, as we pointed to earlier, this
is on the twelfth. This is the leader
of, in Iran. With this crime, the Zionist
regime has prepared its for itself a bitter,
painful fate, which it will definitely see. Now
that doesn't mean it's actually gonna happen. That's
just, you know, political rhetoric. But,
historically, Iran, not immediately, does follow through with
what they claim.
Now Menchocin points out that the Iran this
is today, about the middle of the day.
The Iranian armed forces announced they successfully downed
an Israeli fighter jet. Now that does seem
to be the case. There's been following reports
about a a pilot being taken.
Realize that right now, there's probably more going
on. So if you got anything important you're
seeing, put it in the chat, and I'll
try to include it.
Iran claims to have downed the jet and
have actually captured a pilot. This is all
this is all breaking right when we're going
when I was going live. Insider paper points
out the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran
radioact realize it's so funny how people are
so you can read the comments, but I
thought they didn't have any nuclear it's like,
you don't understand the reality. They have nuclear
they're they at least they claim it's only
a civilian program.
The evidence backs that up. But people point
to this to suggest that, see, they're admitting
they've got nuclear weapons. People are just so
ignorant of the topic. But it says radioactive
leak detected inside their nuclear facility. Well, gee,
you think that might have something to do
with the bombing that just took place? You
The ones that are acting like they're saving
us all from this when they literally just
like, they're trying to create chaos. Remember with
all the hype about Ukraine and the nuclear
facility there that that Russia was bombing and
then the moment that Russia took control, the
Ukraine turned around and started bombing it? It's
like, it's just so obvious how they were
being played in every possible facet.
US now moved their ships closer to Israel.
Right? Because this is yet again Israel's war
that the US government is fighting.
Live updates, Israel hit by missiles as Iran
retaliates for strikes on nuclear sites. I'm just
including these so you got this will develop
as the day goes on. This is what's
simple was going on right before I went
live. Robert reports today,
Iranian ballistic missile counter attack on Israel now
reports over a 150 missiles fired.
And here is a picture of of Tel
Aviv.
He Robert reports
Iranian ballistic missiles impact Central Tel Aviv blew
through the air defenses on live TV. That's
my point. What happened to the Iron Dome,
guys? Especially as Trump is now pushing this
idea that we wanna get a Golden Dome.
I mean, this we're being played in its
spectacular ways. This is probably more Israeli infiltration.
There's probably some AI Palantir manipulation.
Overall, if you're gonna emulate what they're doing,
then we're being played. That's pretty simple. Robert
and I have talked about this a lot.
But that aside, he says likely he hit
intelligence and military buildings, but they did hit
Tel Aviv. Right? Which they're they're already spinning
into some massive Paris attack and they're bombing
some but don't forget, as Glenn points out
today,
Israel in 2021
built its new IDF. No. That's important.
They had a location, but they built their
new location in the context of all that's
going on,
the IDF supreme command post in the heart
of Tel Aviv,
buried beneath blocks of civilian buildings. That's very
easy to prove. It's right there in the
New York Times. You can read it. He
says, called the Fortress Of Zion, it was
deliberately placed so it couldn't be attacked without
seeming to target civilian sites.
That's how this government works.
Axios reports that US forces are involved in
currently repelling Iranian attacks on Israel, which we
already heard in other reports, but that's the
case. They're immersed in this, putting US personnel
at risk for Israel's belligerence.
And, of course, in the meantime, the overlap
with Syria, Netanyahu's thanks Jelani and Al Qaeda
as they're casually refueling their bombing planes
over Syria.
Right? As he says, thanks, Jelani and Al
Qaeda. So you're literally working with the worst
of the people in the world to go
after you know, it just shows you they
are like, if you wanna get into the
whole acts of the, you know, what is
the acts, you know, good guy, bad guy
dynamic.
If you can't recognize right now what Jelani
is in Syria, what the moderate rebels are,
what the people they're what the people they're
supporting anywhere are the worst. Or, you know,
funding different groups to overthrow or divide people
wherever they can. These people are not honest.
I always think it's funny that it pretends
it shows you that I'm not following these
people.
But I am.
There's there's there's part of that, I'm telling
you. There's so much manipulation on this platform.
But again, the Iron Dome, you get this
is, anti war reports, a quote, shield against
nuclear attacks makes nuclear war more likely. Now
the logic is actually sound. Read it for
yourself. It's it's just the point is this
is driving us in the direction they want
to achieve, in my opinion.
Now we play this clip because you probably
remember. Alright? You've seen this before.
It's very important to remember
this is what they've been doing, not in
a partisan way, whatever current administration. This is
Patrick Clawson from the Washington Institute for Near
East Policy
talking about how they can manufacture a war
with Iran.
And this has been going on a very
long time.
And the the the the part that's important
is not just that it is
manufacturing this war, but the idea of how
they get there and how this is always
how wars start. And this is what so
many of us have been pointing out for
such a long time.
I frankly think that crisis initiation is really
tough.
And it's very hard for me to see
how The United States,
president can get us to war with Iran.
Which leads me to conclude that if in
fact compromise is not coming,
that the traditional way of America gets to
war is what would be best for US
interests.
Some people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted
to get us into World War two as
David mentioned, you may recall we had to
wait for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think mister Wilson wanted to
get us into World War one, you may
recall he had to wait for the Lusitania
episode.
Some people might think that mister Johnson wanted
to send troops to Vietnam, you may recall
he had to wait for the Gulf Of
Tonkin episode.
We didn't go to war with Spain until
the USS,
until the Maine exploded.
And may I point out that mister Lincoln
did not feel he could call out the
federal army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which
is why he ordered the commander at Fort
Sumter to do exactly that thing, which the
South Carolinians had said would cause
attack. Now think about this in both contexts.
Right? This overlaps to both. So what they're
doing with Iran and manufacturing consent, regime change,
psychological operations,
as well as what they need to drive
you into conversate you know, through the Los
Angeles discussion, through the psyop therein, and the
riots and the protests and The US manipulation
through it, the arming, the funding, the whatever
else we're talking about. Right? This is both.
How do we get you where we need
you?
That's how all this works out.
So if in fact the Iranians aren't gonna
compromise,
it would be best if somebody else started
the war. Ah, yes. Somebody else.
But I would just like to suggest that,
one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion
on August 17.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean, look people, Iranian submarines periodically go
down. Someday one of them might not come
up. Who would know why?
This is the blithe discussion of people like
this in their little dark in their corner
rooms talking about how they're gonna manipulate people's
lives and laughing about it
and how every war in the past has
been started by a manufactured false flag event.
That's what he just said. Now you could
argue he's wrong, but this is the mindset
of people behind the scenes. And this has
been influenced by Israel as far back as
you wanna look to Israel's existence.
We can do I I that's like I
shouldn't say that, but since they've been influential.
Let's put it that way. Variety of things
if we wish to to decrease the pressure.
I'm not advocating that. Yeah. You are. But
I'm just suggesting that, it it it it's
this is not a a either or proposition
of, you know, it's just sanctions has to
has to succeed or other things.
We are in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
We we could get nastier at that.
Yeah. I I I'd love to see an
example of where you show me Iran carrying
out a psychological operation against The United States.
There's lots of narratives, but funny how it
always turns out that that's not really the
case. Or that you can see that they're
the ones pulling the strings or I mean,
I'm not even saying I I I argue
it's probably unlikely that there's not something you
could find. But just take note of how
hard that is to overlap when you got
a 100 examples in a row from administration
to administration
through Israel that they've been doing this for
a very long time. Now some points to
overlap that on the way out of this
segment, as Pellon points out, Iran isn't bombing
hospitals, Iran isn't bombing refugee camps, Iran isn't
killing UN workers, Iran has not killed 50,000
Israeli children, Iran isn't bombing schools. Is Iran
isn't bombing nuclear facilities.
Israel is a terrorist state.
Kinda hard to disagree with that logic, guys.
Alan McLeod, as I pointed to earlier, says
none of this would be happening
if Iran really did have nuclear weapons. It's
an excellent point. Now it's not that he's
advocating for that. He's just making an obvious
point that shows you the broken the the
broken logic of this whole thing.
Caitlin Johnstone bumps up against what we see
every time, whether bots or just dumb people.
Right? She's making a point, says very shocked
and outraged by Iran's upcoming completely unprovoked antisemitic
attack on Israel. It's perfect. It's exactly I
mean, she's just making an obvious point that
that's what regardless of whether they have a
right to, that's how liars and manipulators and
partisans are gonna try to frame it. Michael
says, now you're sipping for the moolas?
And she just says every effing time. Empire
simps don't understand the concept of opposing the
empire's warmongering on principle.
Principles, the word they seem to have lost.
So in their mind, I just coincidentally
happen to be madly in love with every
single official bad guy regime that the imperial
war machine targets.
It's perfect. You know, the idea being, sure,
maybe that's the case, but you have to
understand that just because people like, it's also
possible that you don't blindly support Iran, but
you recognize, or at least it's your opinion,
that they're doing something wrong on this side.
But in again, I think most of these
are manipulators and bots, but some people do
think, Oh, you must just be paid by
Russia, or whatever. And what's funny is they're
doing like when you guys were laughing at
the left for saying everything was Russia, well,
guess what? You're the same thing right now.
And And that's how this goes with partisanship,
but that's not the majority in my opinion.
But of course, Lindsey Graham and the rest
of the controlled,
you know, government, he comes out and says,
game on. Pray for Israel.
Game on?
God, this guy's a monster, man. Like, legitimately
like, this is one of the grossest people
in the congressional situation.
And by the way, though, recognize that it's
pretty obvious. This you can zoom in on
this.
Across the board, guys, things like this happen,
and they can't jump on their phone fast
enough to go, I support Israel. I'm, I
stand with Israel. Every single one of them,
except for the few you might expect.
I mean, just look.
I mean, on and on. And it's not
just The United States, which is my larger
point.
What does that show you?
And Simon Gadeck says doctor Simon Gadeck says,
Israel attacks Iran.
Normal Americans, what the f? Politicians,
we stand with Israel.
Every statement reads like it came straight from
a package headquarters. In case you were wondering,
yes. We're living in an occupied country, and
that should not even be contentious to point
out anymore. It's not about Jewish people. And
and and other than the overlap there with
Jewish people or with Christians or with Muslims
or with atheists, which all apply to Zionism.
Yes. Very clearly in Israel, the the Jewish
supremacy
that their B'Tselem human rights group will call
out does play a factor.
The point, as we started with the beginning,
is that is Zionism's manipulation through Judaism that
a lot of Jewish people are calling out.
And since I actually mentioned him at the
beginning,
I'll include the interview with Dan Cohen about
this topic.
The manipulated or manufactured Middle East plights and
the Zionism linchpin.
They're all over, guys. Orthodox Jewish communities that
are saying, Zionism
does not represent us, and you have to
acknowledge that part of the story. And I
think it's a vastly growing number.
Now, to end on this
point of the overlap.
Right? What's going on in Los Angeles, the
immigration discussion, just to make my I'm of
the mind that this is being driven through
this discussion. Now that doesn't have to be
that just it's only Israel dictating the outcome.
I do believe that's very likely. But, nonetheless,
the point is about the interest they all
have. And right now, it's a stated interest
of some of these biblical Zionists to see
the West collapse to bring on the end
times. Now you I said that's not crazy.
Or I mean, I see that to be
wildly outside their own possibility in the context
of where we are right now. Nonetheless,
they do not think that's crazy. They believe
that's where this goes. And so the point
is if you are a US politician who
believe in Zionism and you have biblical Zionists
in the leadership of that state of Israel
saying that this state has to be destroyed
for what they want to achieve, and people
like Basent and Hegseth and the rest are
like, yay, Zionism.
How can you possibly be America
Now on top of that, recognize that the
immigration conversation is a major driving force that
we've already seen Israel. There's overlaps of weaponized
migration all over the place from Israel and
their policy, which drive these things on and
on and on. Now those are worth just
pointing out. Now from the focal point of
this conversation, it's important to recognize that what's
happening,
I argue, whether it's the Palantir surveillance state
or just the cracking down of American rights,
there's a 100 different things that we the
Republicans and other context are so quick to
call out that you can see being used
through this. And I talked about this on
June 10. Trump's use of the AlienEnexact was
declared unlawful,
and the LA LA's orchestrated chaos and Israel's
propaganda around this as well. You know, the
the orchestrated nature of this, I argue, is
very clear. My point is that's almost always
the case. And if you are blinded by
the partisan game or rather just if you
see it as the left doing it to
the right, I think you're wrong. Put it
that way.
Question everything, consider that I'm wrong. I think
it's obvious that this does not even remotely
line up with what you claim the right,
the left is trying to accomplish.
How do you explain to me that they're
trying to push in illegal immigration because they
need votes or whatever the logic is? And
then they manufacture an event that gives the
justification for why they shouldn't allow immigrants in
the country.
Yeah. I mean, if your answer is, oh,
they're just so stupid. They didn't think it
through. It's it's like saying a saw just
likes to kill children. Yeah. It works because
there's nothing else. And I would there's no
logic to it. It's just you can say
those words out loud. The facts don't back
it up. But that's what partisans that's the
game, guys. And in this case, it's very
clear that, from my perspective, this is the
the
justification to achieve the great reset, the build
back better, big, big of a bill, you
know, whatever you wanna call it. It's very
clear that this is
being used to achieve what both parties want
or rather just your government. So keeping all
that in mind, we also talked about the
Posse Comitatus Act, and I'm gonna follow-up with
an important point about this. This was on
the June 8.
And remember, actually, I'll grab that if it
comes up.
Yeah. There it is. Just so you can
read it for yourself, this is the actual
Posse Comitatus Act and the the verbiage telling
you that whoever
except under circumstances
by, authorized by constitution or by act of
congress, there's only two disc whether it's a
like, an actual invasion or rebellion
or under the Insurrection Act, for example. Those
are the two different things.
And I'll get to that's why, in my
opinion, you have the Joneses of the world
pushing the idea that this is an actual
invasion, an insurrection, or whichever one works in
the moment. Both are being thrown out at
different times, even though they're very different things.
Because that gives them the legal right in
their mind to ignore this act. As what
I'm gonna show you next is that not
only has the National Guard been used and
federalized, which now also makes that part of
it, but that they have deputized these people
and the marines deployed.
They're enforcing law. It's all on record. You
can see them doing so. So if they're
doing anything but advising them, then that's a
direct textbook violation of this act. All it
stands for is a posse of people to
enforce the law. So the point is, as
a sheriff, for example, you can't just go
round up people
and go and do and enforce the law
as you see it. Or rather the president,
you can't. The point is you have to
do this through legal. Otherwise, they could just
basically form their own army. You see where
this goes. This is a legal reality.
And so, what I'm gonna show you,
include that before I forget.
Here is Melnick pointing out what ICE posted
themselves, which says,
photo from today's ICE Los Angeles immigration enforcement
operation, and you can see them involved. Now
you have to understand. What if they're advising?
That's very different than being involved with, you
know, having shields and pushing back against protests.
You are there enforcing.
There there there's gonna be some nuance or
rather, I shouldn't call it nuance, but some
clumsy partisan argument to make try to make
sense of sort of like the game they're
playing with Garcia. It's not working,
and there are only very dumb people who
are following whatever they're trying to push right
there. But it doesn't mean it's not gonna
work because they're in control. But in this
case, the point is people arguing that they're
not enforcing it, some kind of sidestep. But
he says, ICE confirms that they are using
California National Guard troops
deputized over the objection of the state's governor
to support ICE arrest operations.
Now and and on top of that, they're
also federalized. It's not a state's discussion. They
superseded Gavin Newsom, who I agree is a
monster,
to make this happen, which then additionally adds
another layer to this. But it says, remember
when people freaked out over jail Jade Helm
and thought Biden was going to deploy troops?
Crickets from those folks.
He's right.
My point. I said, oh, so they are
enforcing the law as we already knew. So
I'll just pretend otherwise. Therefore, because they were
deployed under federal authority, this is a textbook
example of the violation of the Cassey Posse
Comitatus Act.
And I have the point, oh, this right
here.
In case
it it makes any more difference to you
that Grock says it, I think that's important
for certain conversations because of people that blind
themselves to certain
mediums.
As you I you can read it directly
from the act. I just showed you. But
here's what Grock will add to it. If
the National Guard deployed domestically and is enforcing
the law on the ground, is it a
violation?
And it says, generally prohibits the use of
federal military forces. That's why it matters because
once they were federalized and not deployed by
the state, they become federal military forces, including
the National Guard when federalized,
right there, to enforce domestic laws.
And I simply said, was the was the
National Guard just deployed in LA under federal
authority, title 10 by Trump? And I says,
yes. According to multiple sources, Donald Trump deployed
2,000 National Guard. You know, you can read
through it. It's exactly what we're talking about.
The point is that this is a textbook
example
of a very important thing that we've been
like, people have been discussing for a long
time, martial law, military deployed. And now, like
we said during COVID, the very people who
would be most on guard about this if
it was a Democrat are pacified because Trump's
there, or or at least because they don't
wanna scream about it because the cat turds
and Jones of the world are convincing them
that you shouldn't because you're gonna hurt the
plan.
Right? Carrie points out,
looking like generations of military propaganda, courtesy of
the government, news media, and Hollywood culture, cultural
institutions,
paired with ongoing this is an invasion of
military
age males and Trump will liberate us rhetoric
has primed lots of people to grovel for
the military to police a nation whose values
are supposed to oppose
exactly that.
PS, she says, I'm in LA and I
can confirm I don't need or want security
theater in exchange for freedom.
And this is Molly Pitcher saying, those rioter
losers are in LA, have no idea what's
coming.
It's just gross how obvious, they either don't
understand that they're the ones destroying this country,
or they do and they're working for something
else. I mean,
this is not America guys. You are literally
undermining the basic things that we fought against.
Here, it just says, we are coming to
LA and shows these military people talking about
it.
Wild. Now, here is
a report that I think is important to
highlight.
Let me close some of these.
Appeals court temporarily blocks judges' ruling
to return control of National Guard to California.
Now it says the the ninth circuit, Court
of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal
judge's order that directed Trump to return control
to California.
So it just shows this battle, and this
is my point. So it's funny how
anything that goes against them is a, you
know, judicial coup and an activist judge working
for politics. And then when the in which
I'm not I don't disagree. I think all
of them are. Doesn't mean you don't doesn't
mean you disregard the circumstance, the the check
and balance, at least as it currently stands.
They're all being appointed for for very clear
reasons. My point is when now you get
a ruling in your direction, which is exactly
the same thing, Like, in in a in
a very obvious way, this is a provable
textbook example,
but they rule to ignore it probably because
they're politically motivated. Now I'm not gonna come
out and go, get rid of the judge.
You know, go super circumvent them because polls
that that'd be stupid and childish. The point
is if they are wrong, then you can
bring it to a higher court. The point
is that this this administration just doesn't care
about the court rulings. They've made that very
clear, or at least they largely don't care
in their until they really have to.
I think it's funny how the hypocrisy.
Either it's a judicial judicial coup, activist judges,
or it's not. And if it's some of
it, then that's not a judicial coup, is
it? If it's a judicial coup, that would
mean the judges are clearly, the Millers of
the world are just giving you what you
need to react emotionally.
Clearly, they don't point it out when they
get a political
ruling in their own favor.
Now
Trump,
here's some repercussions around this conversation, has come
out and said tomorrow that he is going
to use force against protesters,
not if they're violent. And if you wanna
try to pretend that he just you know,
that's what he meant. Well, you don't just
get to insert words into his verbs, okay,
or into his language. He,
three times in a row here, says that
if they protest, they'll be met with violence.
And I'll make two more points after we
play this. I think this is very obvious,
and it goes back to the same clips
we played about guns, about the Internet, about
the flag. The constitution
is simply
a
something to be stepped on to these people.
And if you can't see that by now,
you're not paying attention. Big on Saturday. We're
gonna have a lot of and if there's
any protest that wants to come out, they
will be met with very big force, by
the way. And for those people that wanna
protest, they're gonna be met with very big
force. And I haven't even heard about a
protest,
but, you know, this is, people that hate
our country,
but they will be met with very heavy
force.
Wow. Thank you very much. Okay. So obvious
points can be made here. So of all,
three times he says that. A very big
force. Big force. And for those people that
wanna protest, they're gonna be met with very
big force. And I haven't even heard about
a protest.
Are you kidding me? You see how silly
and petty and small this is?
So, the protest that they've all pointed to,
right? The protest is called No Kings, Devout
Trump on his birthday.
And that's the actual impetus for this
because they do know there's a protest, right?
But because these people need to diminish it
and act like, I don't even know. Is
there even a protest? I don't even know.
It doesn't even matter. It's all small stuff.
I just these are children, guys. Like, that
is so small.
You obviously know it's a protest because you're
literally talking about that protest and when they
come out to protest. But I don't even
know. Is there a protest? It just seems
so dumb to me. And then secondarily, he
goes on to make the point of the
thing he doesn't know exist, that they're all
anti American. So what do you mean? Anytime
anybody protests is anti American? Or the one
that you pretend you don't know is happening
is that one that doesn't exist yet, though?
I mean, you just can't you can't make
this stuff up. That's embarrassing. It's just silly.
And I think that's what happens when you
just when, one, you're petty and your hubris
runs your life, but secondarily, that you just
lie about all sorts of stuff. That's not
unique to left and right, Biden, Obama, and
all the rather, all like this.
But it's just very obvious through him. I
just think no. Let me just just for
sake of those points, listen to this again
and think about this. On Saturday, we're gonna
have a lot of and if there's any
protest that wants to come out, they will
be met with very big force, by the
way. And for those people that wanna protest,
they're gonna be met with very big force.
And I haven't even heard about a protest,
but, you know, this is, people that hate
our country,
but they will be met with very heavy
force.
Right. So the ones we don't know about
yet are all gonna hate the country because
they're protesting, or is it because they're protesting
you?
Right? So you are the country.
Is that the point?
Gosh. Darn it, man. I I just this
is it's alarming
how people hear these things and then cheer.
He's like, that's a scary reality of people
that are that willfully ignorant, that ignorant, or
that dishonest.
Now, additionally, on the eleventh, by the way,
deploying military before a planned protest,
not due to violence, mind you, in Texas,
but simply to the claim that it could
happen.
Do you not see where this is going?
It's it's as if you were protesting something
against the Democrats and they said, well, we
know the right's dangerous, so we're gonna stop
the protests. We're gonna deploy a national emergency.
And you would rightly freak out about that.
Now just because you're gonna in reverse claim
that all the Democrats are evil, Democrat, you
know, whatever your ridiculous all encompassing broad stroke
narrative is, you are the ones undermining the
constitution. You're allowing your emotions to be used
and you that's but the point is people
doing that probably don't even care we're that.
But those that see it need to call
this out. Texas governor Abbott
to deploy National Guard against the state in
response to protests. So here we are with
emergencies being declared, military being deployed like like
because it's Tuesday. Like, this is getting
it's not out of control. This is clearly
what they want. But it's getting,
you know, it's progressing to a point to
where we need to start calling this out.
And this person says, so wait till they
destroy the city. Right?
See my point? Like, so that's terrifying.
I hope it's a bot, but if it's
not, that's such an uninformed American
that they are of the mind that you
have to preemptively
stop the crime that you expect to happen.
How did we get here? Well, that's preemptive
self defense. Isn't that what that's what if
Aisha didn't even mention that, to be honest.
That's quite surprised.
Israel is claiming that. Their whole claim I
wish I would remember this at the beginning
of the conversation. They're claiming it was preemptive
self defense.
It's just cartoonish. That's what it comes with
the Bethlehem doctrine that apparently only The US,
The UK, and Israel use, which means they
can attack, well, who they want if they
their intelligence suggests that they might attack you.
There's no legal reality to that, guys. That's
simply you attacking and manufacturing narratives, and usually
they lie about it. Like Bolton and the
limpet mines in Iran that turned out to
be them moving their own boats in their
own harbors, but that was the credible threat
that led to all of that.
Now we can prove that, but we don't
care. Right? It's just insane how clear that
is. They are manufacturing it. But so same
point here is we need to, what, preemptively
attack Americans because you think they're violent. You
guys, you're losing the plot. And I said,
admit you don't care about same thing I
said before. Admit you don't care about or
don't understand the constitution without saying you don't
care about or don't understand the constitution. By
your logic, the government can violate your rights
if it claims you'll be violent. We can't
be this stupid.
Alex Jones
on the tenth.
So this is a building discussion right now.
I think this is kind of funny if
it wasn't so alarming
that it starts as Americans protesting ICE because
they're breaking the law, which is transparently clear.
And people that committed violence, they some of
them got held accountable for it. So good.
They that the crime, they should be held
accountable. But then the idea that they're all
violent is what they did to you in
reverse. And you guys know it. Stop being
a hypocrite. You can't invalidate everyone's right to
protest because people were violent, especially when we
know that they manufacture that violence all the
time. The point is that this to come
out, oh, that from there, it becomes, you
know, Americans protesting then somehow became Mexicans invading
because of a flag.
Just break where are the great facts you
guys are reporting? You know, and then they
lurch into abstract things that can add to
it but don't prove it's happening, which is
the narrative becomes what we claim based on
nothing, and they build on that narrative that
then becomes back. This guy literally traffics this
every day. But so here's an interesting point.
If you understand your history, you understand that
the US government basically strong-arm Mexico despite giving
some money to them to take over
the all what is now The United States
in regard to California and around what used
to be Mexico.
So that's a very clear thing to prove.
And then point is beyond that, like everything
else, they did not may they did not
hold up their end of the agreement.
They didn't respect the people that they
it's what the US government does, guys. Ask
the Native Americans, ask everybody they deal with.
Ask the Houthis, ask the or rather the
yeah. That actually applies. Ask the Kurds.
My point is this guy comes out and
makes a statement about this. I find the
nation pretty interesting. He's playing the game. This
is the Mexican senate president. And he says,
look. If if you wanna if you wanna
give us back what you took from us,
and that's the image he's showing, then we'll
we'll pay for the wall, the entire thing.
In no way is he going, we're gonna
take we're gonna invade and take this by
force. They're trying to conflate that flimsy, unprovable
narrative that they claim is happening here with
this because it simply works. And the point
is, he's making a point to say, we
will we'll pay for it all if you
give us back what you took from us,
and then goes on to make the point
about how they're treating immigrants. That's the point.
Here's what Alex Jones watch it for yourself.
It's only two minute two and a half
minutes. Alex Jones says the narcoterrorist
controlled
Mexican government
is now publicly promoting a plan
to annex
The United States Southwest.
That's not even remotely what he said, but
you'll never get a fact check for these
kind of Twitter,
you know, embedded manipulators.
The point
well, it sometimes does happen. The point, though,
the narcoterrorist control, do you mean like the
cartels? You mean like the cartels you can
literally prove Israel's embedded with and the United
States government for that matter? Guys, if you
take a to just search that, even today
with all that's going on, you'll find a
100 different articles even from US government adjacent
information, like, from the intelligence that show that
they know Israel is behind the scenes working
with the cartels. Same with the US government.
By the way, that shouldn't be shocking to
anybody that even barely pays attention to history
and what's going on around the world. But
see, that doesn't matter to people that are
pushing a narrative in the moment. Sort of
like the people that tell you the world
New World Order and all North American Union
and everything we're watching for. Then the moment
it actually starts to happen, they point somewhere
else. China, everything, don't look over there. Look
anywhere else but Palantir.
But
they did this
more than him because the idea was to
create the illusion that Mexico's invading even though,
again, thirty seconds before that, it was Americans
protesting ice. They just will go with whatever
works, guys. It's embarrassing.
And here's red state working off that very
claim. It sure seems like the Mexican senate
president just called for invading The United States.
Guys, it didn't.
It's not even remotely what happened. You're insinuating
that through the idea of what I think
is a well crafted point to say that
we'll pay for the whole wall if you
just give us back what was ours and
then goes on to say he's mistreating these
people, which he is.
To make that into we're gonna take your
country is just like they even could functionally
do that. It's just beneath them.
But Jason Dassler
makes the best point.
He says, let's be real.
If these were the flags they were waving,
the right would never have said a word,
and you damn well know it. Right? The
guy standing on the car with an Israeli
flag, the guy riding on a motorcycle around
the car with an Israeli flag, and they
put Palantir and MAGA and stuff. Are you
are you really gonna pretend that you think
that this would have gone crazy if they
were Israeli flags?
We all know the answer to that. Everybody.
I think that's a very well crafted point.
Now here's Alex again saying the Democrat financed
and controlled insurrection is now spreading nationwide.
And they're pointing to small little examples of
violence. And there are violence and some of
them get arrested for it. But as we
talk about today, the vast majority of the
area and the vast majority of people involved
are not spinning out into crazy violence, but
there are examples of it. And that's what
they're showing you. But that happens every time.
And yes, even Alex will wax intellectual for
hours about,
agent provocateurs
except when it's their narrative. Right?
Obviously, that's part of this, and it could
be in any case. And the point is
that's not even being brought up. But then,
of course, the bigger point, a Democrat financed,
well, you can point to these overlapping things,
or really the Walmart heiress and the influence
of the masks that were delivered. It's also
abstract and subjective.
To say that then means Walmart, which therefore
means Democrats, it certainly could. But adults in
the room know that's a wild, leaping assumption.
The point is the government
always
is investing in different sides of the stoking
of the problem, which achieve their ends.
He would point that out if it was
any other context.
But so the insurrection, that's my point. Do
you know why he's saying that in my
opinion? Because they need that. They need to
frame this scattering of different things as an
insurrection, which then will allow them in their
minds to deploy the military and do whatever
they want. It's the same conversation of January
6, guys, that you rightfully called back, called
out.
Now Now you're doing the same thing in
reverse. David Icke says, here we go again,
Alex Jones. The, quote, deep state is Democrats.
Pathetic.
The goal the global cult operates through both
sides, in quotes. And in this case, one
side, in quotes, generates the extremes of protest
and the other in the government responds with
the military. Who benefits from this perpetual pincer
movement? The cult does with its agenda and
global dystopia. The left, in quotes, protests what
it would have supported under Biden had the
military targeted the, quote, right.
And the, quote, right cheers on the military
for targeting the, quote, left when it would
have been furiously condemned
if it was done to them.
It's a conspiracy.
They would have screamed, yes, it is. And
now the Trump promoting MAGA hysteria through people
like Alex Jones is a key part of
that conspiracy
and the way it plans to divide
and rule America into tyranny.
Those working through the puppet Trump want civil
war because while they focus on population the
population on fighting each other, the dystopia can
be slipped through unchallenged.
It's not new, guys. He's even demanded
to solve the, quote, problems the cult has
systematically created through its assets on both sides.
He says children in adult bodies have always
been the foundation of the human
plight. How tragic it is that we have
so many. Look at my books from from
way back. Current events are all predicted because
if you are playing it paying attention,
it's also predictable.
And here's another one. Derek Bro says beware
of losers trying to convince you that civil
war is about to happen, which none of
us neither of us are trying to say
that civil war is not possible or that
maybe that there you know, the overlap like,
that's where this may be going. The point
is that they're trying to hype anything right
now. Like, I mean, again, we can't pretend
that we didn't just watch Alex Jones tell
you we were already in World War three.
And I went through on that very show
to show you how many times he's even
done that before. Every month, it seems, we're
in World War three. And yet, here we
are.
And I'm the one that will make the
argument of what if you wanna talk about
metrics and the idea of what what we
used to say constitutes a world war, I
think we've been in that for a long
time. But that's not the point he's making.
He's saying because of what just happened, now
it's all starting. We're de facto in World
War three with Russia.
Not that it's always been there. Right? It's
just it's just hype, guys. They're trying to
manipulate you. And he says, go search Luke
Kreadowski's videos to see how many times over
the years he's used similar clickbait titles. Alex
Jones is one of the worst as well.
Do not give these people your time and
money.
Aramelle Mick points out, and this is what
this is about the reality of why people
are protesting. Now, I'm not gonna say that
there's I mean, I think we know there
are paid protesters. It's always the case, and
we can prove it right now.
And
from all of it, I would argue. But
the point is that there are people you
can prove are protesting against what they feel,
and I agree, are violations of the constitution
of of the government, ICE.
And so people are pointing out as Stephen
Miller, the rest are making this about illegal
rapists, you know really lands rapists and terrorists
and you know all this bombastic talking points
that are not represented in what's actually happening.
And he's and this is John Favreau saying,
Steven Miller's tweets are becoming indistinguishable from a
4chan and sell manifesto.
Aaron Melnick says, not a single invasion
in history involved people entering another country to
become dishwashers and delivery drivers. Now, I could
obviously point out that in asymmetrical warfare, you
should at least consider that people are embedding
themselves for long term action, of course.
But if you're gonna do that, then you
should very clearly point out the most obvious
examples of what country's doing that. Either way
though, consider it. But not make it up.
Facts matter. He says, but his point is
simply to highlight that there's this scattering long
term discussion that they just lump into being
one thing when they want it to. But
he says, Miller wants you to be terrified
of people who are trying to feed their
families, so when he rounds them up and
abuses them, you won't protest.
He also points out, remember exactly according to
Wall Street Journal, the precise orders that Stephen
Miller gave to ICE a few weeks ago
before these protests started, which was stop focusing
on targeted arrests, people they know are criminals,
and regular procedure, and instead, just go out
there and arrest illegal aliens, which by definition
and the way you're framing that, meaning just
people that you perceive to be. And that's
what it says very clearly. Go to seven
eleven and Home Depot. It's right there.
And just scoop up people that are there.
He screamed according to many people, to the
the leaders of the ICE discussion or the
people that were there to trickle down his
daughters to ICE. And they were, like, out
he was outraged that he didn't have more
numbers.
Just like Israel and the killings, they're forcing
an outcome regardless of the circumstance. That's obvious.
And people were outraged, rightly so. We I
mean, guys, from day one, and I I
I'm not partisan despite what people claim. I'm
critical of the left and I'm critical of
the right in equal shape equal manner based
on what's true and what we can prove.
The reality is that from day one, you
can easily prove that look look at Khalil.
Look at Ozturk.
That we there's
an end the story is basically well, some
of them aren't over, but the facts have
flushed out in 17 different ways. They lied
to you. They said bad things about Israel
that you could prove are true, and they
got attacked for it. My point is that
this is what has been this has been
going on from the beginning of this whole
thing. They've there's innocent people in El Salvador,
we can literally prove. The majority of the
early push of 200 plus were innocent people
here legally with no criminal record who are
in El Salvador prisons right now. And so
if you can't protest I mean, think about
people that are saying you shouldn't be able
to protest for something like that. The point
is, these protests spun out because people were
immediately recognizing on top of what's already happened,
you're parsing them to go after anybody. So
they started protesting, and Miller called them all
a bunch of infiltrating illegals or whatever else
they framed it as. Most of them, as
far as I can tell, were people that
were Americans who were outraged about what's happening.
And, yes,
this is being manipulated. Now, look, is it
possible that it's just a Democrat organization who
wants to destabilize? Yeah. That's certainly possible.
But if all you have is evidence,
like, in the
let me see the best way to frame
this to make it as simple as possible.
Because I'm of the mind, as you guys
will know, that the left right paradigm is
a game manipulating you. That's not to say
that there are not people that believe those
things. Even in congress,
from the top down, whatever side funds this,
the outcome, like David was just pointing to,
is for the government,
not one side of it. That's so so
it's not to say that there's not a
Democrat led effort and maybe even in their
minds to go after Republicans alone. So I
think I think that's the simplest way to
put it. But you have to understand that
the outcome serves the government control of your
life, whatever side you're on. That's not my
opinion. You can easily show that. The question,
though, is from their minds to in what
end here and is there outside influence.
Right? And so this is,
I mean, therefore I am. And a lot
of people are just fixated on the fact
that there's Democrat influence. Despite the fact that
you can also show other parts of influence
that don't neatly fit their narrative. But I
said despite Israel getting caught
paying TikTokers, as we've all seen, to push
and even censor content,
many are running with the contradictory narrative that
it's only the Democrats despite all of this
completely undermining the very goals that you claim
they seek. I think that's a very important
point. Here is a person on TikTok, which
by the way, we can't prove he's telling
the truth. We also know that our people
that just come out to lie about things
in the midst of chaos because they like
that or think it's funny. Here's a guy
saying he was paid $200 a day to
protest
and and told to go crazy, which would
not surprise me in the slightest. My point,
though, is if we know Israel was caught
paying TikTokers to do things, shouldn't that be
the immediate consideration?
But it could be anybody, as you well
know. But the assumption becomes it is what
we want it to be, not the all
possibilities. But Catherine pointed this out early, and
this is real. This is not some guy
on TikTok. This is actual documentation
of a
Democrat
entity
around immigration rather, I
do stand by that,
the Coalition for Human Immigrant Rights,
basically funding, as it says right here,
these different pushback, it's one of the key
players in fomenting violent response to immigrant in
enforcement actions. And so the point is, through
this taxpayer funding, this is what's happening. But
to me, again, the outcome is what matters,
but that shows you a channel through which
they just use these things to drive us
against each other. All I'm asking is that
you consider that. Because I think that's frankly
obvious what's happening. But just consider
that even if it's through Democrat channels, because
that's what works right now, it's about trying
to drive you to a certain outcome.
Mike Ben did a thing over this. Look,
I don't trust this guy in the slightest,
but nonetheless, he's pointing out the general point.
And a lot of people look at these
points he makes and make it only about
one side, but it doesn't apply one way.
The CIA's riot guide from 1983 calls for
agitators to, quote, create a martyr for the
cause by leading the demonstrators into a confrontation
with authorities. Right?
So we're talking about, from my perspective on
this, people protesting what ICE is doing and
then being like January 6, people protesting what
they thought was the what they thought was
a stolen election. And I again, I'm of
the mind that everyone they're cheating every single
time. So it's not to say that's not
the case. The point is that they were
there fighting for what they thought was a
stolen election. And then people like Ray Epps
and others drove chaos, which they got framed
for. That's very obvious. So I just wish
more conservatives would be honest about how that's
at least possible right here. I think it's
actually obviously what's happening.
But what he's saying is that's what they
always do. Right? You're out there protesting what
you think is wrong and they come in
and cause chaos, then you get blamed for
it. That's what they always do, guys. So
think about that.
Now this is a point James Lee put
out that I think is really important to
consider. There's a lot of videos flying around
and this isn't just about this one. This
is about everything. Even going back to the
deep fake point we just made. This is
just a, of, what's it called? A filter
on TikTok. I should have even said that
before. I should have let you watch it
but since I said it, this is not
real.
But you know everybody people fall for this
stuff because they they they see what they
want to be happening and they fall into
it. So people making videos about how they
got beat up by people with the you
know, these are the,
you know, anti riot anti ICE people that
are beating me up in the street. That
there's a lot of those going around. But
here's at least a reason to consider that
they could be lying to you.
Oh, I thought I added that.
I don't technically need to play the full
thing, but I will just since we got
we have the time.
So like I said, she is
starting out in the video, like, she you
know, I went down there to see what
happened and ultimately shows you that it's a
filter. Oh, I did have it already. I
guess I didn't see it. Here it is.
Or I thought I did.
And it's frustrating. Okay. I was you know
what's funny? As I'm doing this, this is
just confounding. I I was dealing with this
earlier today.
And I sometimes I do this on the
show,
and I can't find it. But there's time
there's something weird going on with this stuff.
Like, I feel like everywhere all the time
right now. I I don't I think we
all know there's weird stuff, like with the
blackouts and what's going on, but where
think like, for example, on Twitter, with Robert's
information. I was posting and retweeting and sharing
this stuff, and it wasn't showing up on
my feed at all anywhere until I had
to caption it and share it with something
I said, and then it showed up.
And this is not unique. I think it's
because Robert is getting a lot of traction
on important things, and they don't want that
to be seen. Now now that I said
all that, let's watch this video.
I live in LA, so I decided to
go downtown today and talk to people and
find out what's really going on, what's their
side of the story to only get attacked
and realize that they're all full of shit.
Okay? Can't believe Look. Yeah. Pause it right
there so you can see it. See that?
That's a lens. That's a, a filter.
So all of the stuff on her face
is fake. That's what she's pointing out. They're
all full of shit.
I'll try to get an easy shot with
it right here. There it is. See it
right there. Look at that.
K? You know?
And people are falling for this stuff. Some
because they want to. Right? But others because
it looks real and they're not checking stuff.
So people are being played. It's wag the
dog style today, guys. And just to point
out, Stephen Miller comes out and says, Believe
it or not, California used to be a
paradise. Mass migration has brought us to where
we are now. I simply said you misspelled
Palestine. The point is he's clearly trying to
create this idea that it's all the illegal
people destroying our country when when the reality
is what they support in every other context
is exactly that. They're just hypocrites, guys. They're
hypocrites.
Now, the immigrant speaking of hypocrites, the point
we're gonna end on, Stephen Miller says, if
your stance is that you can only deport
illegals after they violently attack a citizen, then
you're saying we have no border at all,
which I don't know if anybody's saying that.
The whole point is that in if you're
here I mean, there are fringe opinions and
everything. But the reality is it's a law.
You're breaking the law. So if you're here
illegally, then there's a lot of that. But
there's nuance around it. If you're seeking asylum,
if you're trying to get your citizenship, those
things matter.
The point is, they're trying to conflate this
with just some people out there saying that
no matter if they're illegal or not, nobody
cares. Now there are some of those fringe
weirdos out there. Like, I think that's insane.
That's like saying a law doesn't matter. But
for him to frame it as that's the
argument versus
getting rid of illegals, it's just not the
reality, guys. But Miller, Zionist himself, is hell
bent on turning this country inside out.
And he says zero rules, zero restrictions, no
limits. Guys, that's just not true. Anyone get
gum, anyone overstay a visa. People are morally
outraged.
Well, guess what?
Trump came out and said this. Our great
farmers and people in hotel and leisure business
have been stating that their very aggressive policy
in immigration is taking very good long time
workers away from them, with jobs being almost
impossible to replace. In many cases, criminals allowed
into our country by the very stupid Biden
open board policies are applying for those jobs.
This is not good. We must protect our
farmers, but get the criminals out of here.
Great. So work yourself a new pretzel to
make sense of that one for me. The
ones that they tell you are okay. Oh,
got it. Except here's nowhere with his no
no, you know,
black and white. They're legal. They go, which
is what their whole push has been. And
then Trump goes, accept all the ones that
we like and the ones that work for
our businesses and the ones that are in
farms and the ones in the hotels and
the ones. Yeah. That's stupid. Here's what he
actually said.
Look today, I put out a statement today
about farmers.
Our farmers are being hurt badly by you
know, they have very good workers. They've worked
for them for twenty years. They
they're not citizens, but they've turned out to
be, you know, great. And we're Yeah. So
they're legally here. This is the point. We're
gonna have to do something about that. We
can't take
farmers and take all their people and send
them back because they don't have
maybe what they're supposed to have, maybe not.
What was that? You you mean they don't
have citizenship? Is that what you meant to
say? They don't have documentation? He's kinda weird.
Oh, maybe not. Maybe wishy wishy wishy washy.
Like, how blithe is that to destroy people's
lives who were actually here legally on a
massive scale? And again, going back to the
origins of people like Khalil and Ozturk, who
actually green card Visa, who were completely on
the up and up, had no criminal record,
who were here legally
to destroy their lives because they said what
the what Israel doesn't like. And for you
to make this idea that, well, maybe they
don't have it. Like, these are the Millers
and Gnomes and Bondies are, like, aggressive.
They shouldn't be here. They get thrown away,
and we're gonna send them to El Salvador
because they're just illegally here. That was the
line they drew. And now you're going,
maybe, maybe not. Who cares? We'll figure it
out. I just think it's insane.
And this is bothering people. Like, look, there's
a lot of Republicans that are, like, just
completely confounded by this because they were of
the mind that there's no air in this,
that their illegals are bad and we just
stop it because that's what they pushed. They
leaned into the most radical side of the
conversation, and now they're shifting. But as Tracy
points out, that's what they tend to do.
I just think this is insanely obvious. And
you know what's gonna have to be, you
know, great. And we're gonna have to do
something about that. We can't take
farmers and take all their people and send
them back because they don't have
maybe what they're supposed to have, maybe not.
Mhmm. And you know what's gonna happen and
what is happening? They get rid of some
of the people because, you know, you go
into a farm and you look and people
don't they've been there for twenty just listen
to the way he's doing this. You you
so obviously know that he is,
you know, like, people like, the way he's
doing it is trying to he's bad at
maneuvering what he knows is obviously contradicting what
he said before.
But you know that people that blindly support
him, which is this entire inner they will
go along with whatever he said. Like, it's
absolute gospel, and there was never a contradiction
anywhere. Twenty five years and they've worked great
and the owner of the farm loves them
and everything else and then you're supposed to
throw them out and you know what happens?
Yeah. Buy your orders, bud. That's what you
have been doing. It's not some abstract thing
going on. You have been the orchestrator of
this whole thing. And now because, obviously, people
who have, you know, billion dollar billion dollar
agriculture businesses that run on illegal immigrants, they
said, hey, bud. I need that. Stop doing
this, and he falls in line or whatever
it is. Yeah. I mean, maybe it's his
interest. Maybe it's people he knows. Maybe it's
an Israeli, you know, like, this whole thing
about China owning land. I guarantee you, Israel
owns all sorts of things in this country,
more than businesses they operate through their intelligence
in this country, like Carbine, like Comframe, like
a number of them. The point is that
that is just
egregiously hypocritical.
They end up hiring the people, the criminals
that have come in, the murderers from prison.
Oh, we know that, do we? So you
get rid of an illegal alien that they
hired, and we just the elite the criminal
steps into its place? Well, wouldn't they also
be illegal? And couldn't you also remove them?
Explain that logic to me. So you're gonna
go one round and be done forever and
let the rest of them scoop in after
them? I mean, Gary, this is just so
stupid, and anybody with a brain can work
these things through. That's my point. It's very
clumsy what's happening right here. Everything else. So
we're we're gonna have a an order on
that pretty soon, I think. We can't do
that to our farmers and leisure too, hotels.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. In a sec secondary thought.
You know, hotels with I run, you know,
no big deal there. We're gonna
have to use a lot of common sense
on that. If you Common sense. Yeah. Clearly.
Right? So as I think Jeffrey pointed out
today, so if you're claiming that's common sense,
then what you just admitted is everything you've
done so far is not because they're completely
contradictory.
At the very least hypocritical, right? You're saying
one thing and then when it applies to
your interest, it's suddenly something else, which might
as well be the partisan definition.
Now, again, I'll let Stephen Miller come back
to that. I wanna show that. Oh,
before we get to it, there's another clip.
Has to do with Chinese immigrants, which I
think is relevant. But
Patrick says, Steven, what did the president mean
by this? Like, clearly calling him out. Right?
Because he's up here going, no. Thou shall
not pass. No air in the conversation. And
Trump goes, accept all them and makes them
look stupid. But they don't care. I mean,
I think they do in the interest of
Trump, for whatever reason, deviating from the plan,
you know, whatever Zionist infiltration is going on,
call them out for it.
Michael Tracy says, illegal immigration is such a
a catastrophic blight on society that those who
knowingly employ illegal immigrants will be given special
consideration to continue employing illegal immigrants.
He does a great job sometimes of just
encapsulating the stupidity of the whole thing. But,
you know, very partisan. Consider that. I don't
blindly follow and trust anybody. I just think
that's insane.
That is the narrative they built this entire
time. And then he makes a great point
that they're the ones knowingly employing illegal aliens
and they're not a problem. It's like the
whole Epstein client list thing on a much
smaller degree, but you're just ignoring the real
problem there because they're not really going after
this problem, guys.
And this says, backing amnesty for illegal immigrants
after the influencer brigades just spent the past
week in apocalyptic uproar over the innate evils
of any and all illegal immigration is a
point in favor of the hip the hip,
hypothesis that the funniest possible outcome is usually
the most likely one.
Or that they just want chaos, and this
is not about American anything. It's about somebody
else bringing us to our knees.
But, of course, Cernovich steps in, somebody's blind
adherence to the team.
This is this, okay, this is funny. This
is on June 12.
Saving America is not negotiable, says the White
House account. And he says Biden let 21,000,000
undead illegal aliens flooded the country. Many of
them rapists, murderers, terrorists, and all you know,
the same big this is what they've been
pushing the whole time. It makes sense of
this for me with what he just did.
They have stolen American jobs because he was
like, okay. You you there are criminals in
any group. To claim somehow that you know
that most of them that's provably false, by
the way. In fact, there's plenty of even
US data that shows you from both sides
of the paradigm that the majority of these
people don't in far less percentage than average
Americans. My my point is because, obviously, most
of them are they're just trying to keep
away from go getting deported.
That they're illegal. That's a crime. They should
be that's my opinion. The point though is
that many of them are trying to fly
under the radar, so they don't. That's you
could look up the data for yourself. But
it goes on to make this whole thing
about, you know, exactly what you'd expect. Those
are here legally should self deport using the
app, or we will remove
you except until it's the ones you like,
or, you know, your buddy calls you on
the phone and says, Trump, you're hurting my
business. So sir, Cernovich says the base spoken,
Trump listened.
God. Like, this is the same day, by
the way, that Trump made those statements. He
says, unlike welfare queens, Tom Massey and Rand
Paul isn't it funny how the America
reality people, the ones that are actually fighting
for those things, at least in most ways,
are the ones that everyone turned on because
Trump said so. As always, guys, it's not
America for this crowd. It's Trump
And he says, who cry when voters speak
their concerns? Who are you talking about?
I mean, really? Like, that just seems like
baseless dis misinformation
for the team you're on. And it says,
now go cry more about paid influencers, your
taxpayer funded dollars podcasters.
Is he talking about his own team? I
mean, that seems pretty interesting. The bottom line
is that's incredible. Promises made, promises kept as
you literally allow the opposite to happen.
So Sean, some people this is Sean, not
familiar. Far I guess I am following him.
Farashi. Who is this again?
Not familiar. I don't I don't remember. But
the point is, he says, I'm confused. Legal
immigration is fine. Illegal immigration is not fine.
This feels amnesty ish.
Remember, that was the Biden point. Giving them
amnesty, giving all letting allowing
Chinese immigrants to come in, whether students are
not, allowing people who are in farms that
you like being given broad amnesty. Remember what
Trump said about that when Biden did that
to people that they've reported?
He said that doesn't that's illegal. They don't
care.
See how hypocritical this is? Because Biden declared,
and by the way of his hand, we
already talked about this, that all these people,
people from Sudan, we all played that they're
all here legally because we're protecting them. Okay.
You can disagree, but he did that. You
step in and go wrong and put them
in prisons, which is mostly what happened, or
send them to terrible places in the world,
and then do the same thing.
Just it's it's cartoons, guys. These it's embarrassing.
As an American, I'm embarrassed by all this.
This person and then, Patriot Voice says because
MAGA was snowed again. And he says, hey,
MAGA. Did you vote for mass amnesty of
illegal immigrants as long as they are farmers
and hotel workers?
He says, this accounts for a large probably
the most the largest percentage of illegals in
our country. So much for mass deportations was
Trump touted vigorously on the campaign trail. I
mean, do we even need to go over
all this? Like, I'm of the mind that
most people here already know this, but the
sad thing is so many out there, they
they'd
read this and wouldn't even care.
Facts aren't what they're fighting for. Here's a
my point from earlier, a lot of these
are major this one's not that major, but
a lot of these are large MAGA supporting
accounts.
They treat, quote, the same thing and simply
say, without quivocation,
anyone that hires illegal should be fined, publicly
humiliated, and flogged.
I don't care who they voted for. This
is a MAGA account. I'm just trying to
make it clear to people out there, you're
not alone. Stop trying to adhere to these
screaming idiots at the top of this paradigm.
Most people are aware we're deviating rapidly from
even what you were promised. Here's another example.
Destiny Resendiz.
She says, what the f? Can't wait to
hear those within MAGA who've been screening China
is the problem, like Lumer, like a lot
of them, Jones, in in response to the
criticism of this administration's foreign policy. Right? She's
life most voiced concerns over Trump's admin aligning
with war criminal BB, Netanyahu,
and many MAGA on the app tried to
shut down that conversation, and most of them
used the China threat
to redirect the spotlight. Now what? If China
is the big problem, why does Trump want
half a million Chinese to go to school
here and possibly stay? I'll play the clip
for you. So much for borders. Just bring
them in like Biden did? Guys, it's actually
shockingly crazy. This is like this is you
know what? This is exact as as crazy
to me as two days into the administration
deploying an mRNA platform and having that not
just completely derail everything. It's the exact opposite
of what's being promised. And I kinda think
that's by design. But you guys can decide.
All I want is people to see that
and call it out.
She says, what about COVID? You know what
virus that started because our universities,
Chapel Hill, working with the Chinese that led
to millions of deaths and plummeted everyone closer
to poverty? Now, she's well aware of The
US, as David Martin would tell you, is
like the real culprit there, but China was
involved. But, you know, the partisan narrative is
China did it, right? But now it's okay
to bring Chinese students in. How do you
make sense of any of this? Now he
says, it's okay. We'll just bring them in
to do the science here on our soil.
Now, arguably, I think it's a lot to
do with AI and where the the the
the the, you know, work base comes from.
There's a lot of leading people in that
field. I think that's what it's about.
He says, we'll just bring them into the
science. Why not let Charles Leiber lead this
effort? See, she knows.
It's just students, Destiny. That's what they'll tell
her. Right? People that ignore the facts. And
if it was Democrats doing it, they'd scream
foul. She says, yeah. What about those h
one b visas y'all were and fuss over?
She there's there are honest people out there
that see this every day, not just this,
but every time they're contradictory and call it
out. Destiny's one of them. She says, bring
them in. Just make sure they don't support
Palestinians because they'll deport them. It's just well
put. Now here's the clip that should shock
you if you're paying attention.
Always been in favor of students coming in
from other countries. Oh, now he's always been
in favor, unless they support unless they call
it Israel, right? Or unless they look different
than you or unless they, you know, and
on and on and on. You've always been
in support. That's just a literal rewriting of
history.
That includes China.
No. It doesn't. And, we have 500,000
Chinese students coming in. I've always been in
favor of it. Wow. 500,000.
Does it mean you,
that you have to watch people? Yeah. You
have to watch students, but you have to
watch other people also.
I've always been strong. Such a meaningless statement.
So basically nothing then. If it's everyone, then
nothing or all. Right? That's not what he
wants you to take from that what you
will. That yes, we'll monitor all of them,
which they probably will. But then he goes
to say, but we monitor everybody. So basically,
you just said nothing will change. They'll be
the same for everybody.
It's it's it's the way he does this.
Because one's meant for one group, the other's
meant for the other. And one side will
ignore one part of it, the other side
will ignore the other. They take what they
want from it. It's how this works. In
favor of it. I think it's a great
thing. It's also
it's good for our schools. It's good for
I think it's good for our country. I
think also in favor of having them stay.
I've been in favor of Wow. Letting them
stay. If you get educated for four years,
you're willing to get educated for Except unless
you're Auster, unless you're Khalil, unless you're anybody
out there that's protested in any way against
Israel, which they've aggressively gone after. Hypocrites. Four
years, I like,
people being able to stay. You know, they
have some great students. I mean, this is
just a gross misrepresentation of what they've all
been doing. Maybe it's because they know they're
failing and they're trying to reset the narrative.
Just it's just lazy. It's embarrassing.
Now Laura Loomer, China's cozy relationship with Dominican
Republic is worrisome.
Just as I previously reported, China is trying
to solidify relations with the Dominican Republic, and
Biden holdovers at the state department are helping
them to undermine Trump's agenda, and then this
happens.
You know what I mean? Like, it's just
these people are clowns, guys. I'm not even
saying you I'm not even getting into the
new the points about where in Dominican Republic
Of China. Sure. That's not even the point.
My point is about the overlap of Trump
and the agenda here and how these people
with their hair on fire will point at
anything other than the Israeli infiltration that's literally
happening
every moment.
And here's another point on the tenth. I'm
really excited that we are rallying Americans to
be anti China. We need more anti CCP
energy in our country. It's about time we
wake people up to the fact that CCP
is our enemy and then Trump lets in
500,000.
You know what I mean? Like, it just
is so contradictory in every possible way.
Mel says, wow. They the the hits just
keep coming today. Trump said yesterday, the trade
deal with China was done in exchange for
rare earth minerals, which how long have I
been telling you that was playing a factor?
We would grant Chinese students access to our
college universities. Now to be clear,
rare earth minerals in China is a very
public conversation. My point was that this was
going to be needed. This claim that they
were mining everything we needed here, all the
lies, there was they were always going to
need China in regard to where this goes
with AI.
And here we are.
That's what it looks like to actually be
correct on something and not waver with every
other point until finally comes that one of
them come to pass. But it says,
the party left out is that he's doubling
the number of visas China is already getting.
So screw the hourly workers and do have
to compete with illegal labor and blue collar
and market and screw our kids who now
have to compete with an extra 230,000
Chinese students who'll be filling up our college.
Yeah. All the same things that the Republicans
were just saying. But it's okay because Trump's
okay with this one. Right?
Well, to finish in general,
Palantir, you can't decouple this from the larger
conversation. So all of this, everything today we
talked about is in one way rationalizing this
conversation. And she says, remember that the time
that that time that that Trump Schills remember
that time that Trump Schills said that Palantir
needed access to the IRS, Social Security Administration
records so they could help find the illegals.
Right?
And then, like, a week later, Trump said
he was going to grant amnesty to all
those working illegals. Remember that?
Do you understand, she says, now why we
freaked out so much? It was never about
tracking legal immigrants. It was always about hunting
political dissidents.
Now look, that's her opinion, but I agree.
I think that's exactly the case.
Man in America broke this down, just interviewed
Derek, by the way, and says everyone's watching
the riots in LA, but no one's asking
why now. Why now?
They unleash chaos and then offer the solution.
Palantir powered AI, facial recognition, biometric tracking. ICE
just signed a $30,000,000 contract. The groundwork is
being laid right now. And the most vocal
supporters?
Conservatives.
The same people who once warned about Big
Brother are now begging for digital ID, deportation
squads, and the use of the military, and
AI surveillance, so long as it's used on
illegals.
But the tech doesn't care who has voted
for it. Once built, it'll be used on
everyone. This isn't about safety. It's about control.
You're not watching riots, you're watching the birth
of a technocratic police state and half the
country is applauding it. Well said.
By the way, I was mentioning this with,
Shannon. This is somebody who I reached out
a while back because he was talking about
something around the election that I that I
appreciated.
I reached out and said, hey. Let's let's
connect.
And apparently, he he apparently got right back
to me. And I was check I checked
my DMs pretty I try to these days
as often as I can.
I didn't see it until a couple days
ago when I reached out about this. And
instead of looking on my DMs, I just
searched for his name. And what do you
know? He got right back and said, yeah.
Let's connect. I'm telling you, guys. There's suppression
tactics on these things to stop people from
collaborating.
It's my opinion, but I think you know
it's the case.
And I'm I've reached out again, but maybe
now maybe we won't see it, but, hopefully,
we can connect. But I'll include this as
as well. Now that just to be clear,
this is not the same as the immigration
OS. That's the we already talked about all
that. This says this is as of June
10. It says ICE advances sole source deal
with Palantir for new surveillance backbone just like
many of us warned. Now realize the immigration
OS and the infiltration of all The U
The US data was one part of this,
but this is just ICE advancing their sole
source deal with Palantir. It's just it it
is another step with this. They're building out
this state that we've been telling you about.
Share people are sharing it on. I'll include
our discussion on April 21 called the great
Palantir reset, seeing where this was going. I'll
include our conversation with the IMA about the
Palantir I am AI Panopticon.
And on the way out, guys, I'll leave
you with another great clip from Greg Reese
about
AI controlling the military. And as he goes
through this, consider the point of AI also
controlling the government, if not being government.
Right? That's something that I really see as
part of this, if not already happening. But
I will leave you with this because I
think this is where our mind should be.
This is something that they really don't want
people focusing on, and that's why you've got
the screamers out there directing you in any
other direction other than what's happening right around
you. So thank you for tuning in today,
guys. I appreciate all the support. If you
wanna continue to support KeyLab,
we do this for free. Right? We put
this stuff out because we believe in it.
And I'll continue to do so regardless of
whether anyone supports it because I believe in
it. But if you would like to see
this grow and get back to where we
were, please find ways to support us even
if it's just a a letter of support.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
In the military,
a kill chain refers to the sequential process
of finding, fixing,
tracking, targeting, engaging, and assessing a target.
And The US military war machine has found
that humans are not as willing to kill
as much as they'd like them to be.
After World War two, studies conducted by Brigadier
General SLA Marshall
showed that only 20% of US infantrymen
fired their weapons at the enemy even when
under direct threat.
He attributed this to an innate human resistance
to killing.
He wrote in his book, Men Against Fire,
that the average and healthy individual has such
an inner and usually unrealized
resistance towards killing a fellow man that at
the vital point he becomes a conscientious
objector.
This led to changes in US military training
such as human shaped silhouette targets
and dehumanization
of the enemy.
In 1996,
the psychological
cost of learning to kill in war and
society
by Lieutenant Colonel Dave Grossman
showed that increasing the kill rate in US
infantrymen
came with psychological
costs due to the guilt and trauma of
killing.
The National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health in 2011
showed that soldiers who believed they killed someone
in combat were at higher risk of PTSD,
depression, and suicidal thoughts.
It is for these reasons that the IDF,
with the help of the US military and
Palantir, have been utilizing artificial intelligence on the
battlefield.
Destroying an entire building to kill one person
may seem extreme for a human, but not
for AI. It is admitted that the AI
targeting system murders innocent civilians
ten percent of the time, and AI is
not bothered one bit.
The golden dome that president Trump announced will
rely upon AI driven tracking and interceptors,
and lethal autonomous weapons are next.
The Bullfrog m two is an autonomous 50
caliber machine gun developed for the US military.
It detects, tracks,
identifies,
and acquires targets autonomously.
Last year, DARPA released footage of artificial intelligence
autonomously flying an f 16, the x 62
a, against a human piloted f 16.
Known as the founder of Oculus VR, Palmer
Luckey is the latest harmless looking front man
for the military industrial complex.
In 02/2017,
Luckey founded Anduril Industries,
a military technology company focused on autonomous military
weapon systems.
To be clear, autonomy does not mean remote
control.
Once an autonomous weapon is programmed and given
a task,
it can use artificial intelligence for surveillance
or to identify,
select, and engage targets.
No operator needed.
It's a scary idea to some people. It's
a scary idea, but, I mean, that's the
world we live in. I'd say it's a
lot scarier, for example, to imagine a weapon
system that doesn't have any level of intelligence
at all. In your mind, is it enough
just to have all these things as deterrents,
or do they have to be deployed and
used? They have to believe that you can
use them. By the end of this year,
Andrew says it will have secured more than
$6,000,000,000
in government contracts worldwide.
The US Department of Defense has the goal
of always having robots,
not soldiers,
make contact with the enemy.
Robotic systems are being developed to perform everything
from surveillance to killing.
With an army of autonomous slaughterbots,
there is no longer a concern of ethics.
If a government wanted to unleash them against
their own people, they will have no problem
following those orders.
Greg Rees reporting.