It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 06/08/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Some important
follow ups in regard to Abrego Garcia that
I've been telling you we were gonna get
to and definitely gonna be discussing in-depth today.
What's interesting is that the we're gonna have
to go into some of the the deeper
parts of this conversation that we flushed out
a long time ago. And there's a lot
of unknowns now, seeing as how yet again,
they're adding a lot
of accusation.
There there's a lot that's been added to
it with this recent indictment coming from the
same people that have been caught repeatedly lying
through their teeth, like bald face lying about
far more than Garcia. That's not to say
that they're lying now. That's for you to
decide. But it's interesting to see that the
how the how this case has,
how it's gone forward. And the you know,
from Bondi and Noam saying he will never
come back to United States and now having
it happen and these different points. And really,
my point is what this all shows you
with
what the the US government at large, left
or right, the way they conduct themselves, the
dishonest nature of the just the inherent sort
of, you know, inherent dishonesty as a matter
of policy,
regardless, you know, if it just might be
uncomfortable, make you look bad, they they lie.
This is this is our government. This is
government, to make it clear.
Now what we're gonna show in that case
is that they're still lying about him, and
I mean in the cases that we can
prove. That doesn't mean he's not a criminal.
I don't know that. I I don't know
every single thing about this person. But it's
important to remember that the argument from day
one, from this platform at the very least
and a lot of other honest ones out
there, the only argument that was being made
was not that we knew for sure whether
this guy was a criminal, but that we
would have been able to to to a
certain extent
had they gone through due process, had they
done what they're now going force being forced
to go back and do, acting like somehow
this is their success. Sort of like when
they lost the Supreme Court judgment seven to
zero and still claim they won it.
Same kind of thing. This is justice in
action, Bondi says. You mean the thing you
swore would never happen? So now you're telling
us that's you know? So justice is what
you said was never going to happen before?
It the point is they will go along
with whatever needs to happen to make the
argument make sense for the people that will
blindly follow regardless of the narrative, which is
a large grouping, unfortunately enough. I don't think
it's the majority these days. But we're gonna
talk about how that's important for a lot
of different things as the immigration point overlaps
with lots happening in this country, even foreign
policy.
But where it goes from there, discussing what
might happen with this, and and I personally
think it's saying out the gate that this
is, as I said in a recent tweet,
is gonna blow up in their face. Unless
they've just manufactured a ton of evidence that
wasn't there before, and I'll show you what
I mean by that. Not that they could
have just discovered new information, but they're pointing
back to something from 02/2019,
something that the last Trump administration
made a decision on. And so if we're
being told now that there's new evidence, then
the only person responsible for not showing that
then was the Trump administration. But that's not
the point of all this. It's to understand
what matters.
The facts, whether he's a criminal, matters. Whether
he was here illegally, matters. And all of
that would be able to be proven
from day one had they done what they
knew they were responsible or what they were
supposed to do, which is
respect the constitutional rights of anybody in this
country, which includes illegal aliens, which includes people
with green cards, visas, and American citizens. If
you still haven't come around to understand that
yet, you're the reason this is a problem.
You're the you're the person they're aiming this
ridiculous
low lowest common denominator,
flatly dishonest narratives at because people like you
listening will go along with whatever the team
sport politic narrative is of the day. So
if you're here, that's a good step or
any other independent platform because you're willing to
at least hear these things out. So consider
the alternatives, consider the facts, and realize that
there's many, many Supreme Court rulings, Rena versus
Flores being one that I cite, that even
Scalia pointed out, especially in deportation cases that
due process is not you know, it's I
I I shy away from using words like
requirement and because these are inherent, god given
rights that exist whether or not they ever
wrote down all that on pieces of hemp
paper. That's important to understand.
Any person, god given, these things matter, inalienable.
But we're gonna get to that in the
latter half of the show today. There's a
lot of important things I wanna get to
that I think are very relevant to that
case, but a lot of just of, the
many different stories that we've been covering, keeping
track of, whether that's surveillance in Palantir, whether
that's the health and mRNA
and the overlap of that with Palantir and
surveillance, or everything everywhere and the overlap of
that with Palantir and surveillance, but also some
different points around the interesting kind of feud
and how that relates. Personally, I think the
feud with either whether theater or not, and
I think we should always consider that,
is one of the least important things happening.
But it is important as I see as
it relates to some of the other conversations,
sort of as we touched on it with
the recent IMA panel,
of how that may be used to distract
from what's going on with Palantir and a
lot of different ways to look at that.
But, overall, I think the important conversation today
is about how that relates to immigration, where
that seems to be going. But we're gonna
start with a point on Epstein that I
do think is relevant to show the kind
of disintegration of people's trust in government, which
I think is the best thing we could
possibly see right now. That doesn't mean that
you just assume anything. Always consider that someone's
on your side or somebody may be telling
the truth, but it's the skepticism, the inherent
skepticism that they try to frame as somehow
un American that is probably the most quintessentially
American thing that we have or that we
can acknowledge. And so they're always using
tactics,
different sort of, you know, division tactics,
manufacturing consent, or in this case, agent provocateurs
in order to try to drive people into
division so they can use that chaos and
division to roll out what was already the
discussion point from, you know, their plan. And
so we're gonna discuss California as well today
and the overlap of these riots, protests, you
know, there probably all of those. And what's
interesting to see is, as always, it's the
same thing, the same exact thing that this
the the other the right leaning side at
this point was saying in the other time
when it when it was swapped.
Right? That we're not responsible for what one
individual does and or how do we know
they didn't fake that? Or maybe those are
agent block tours. Maybe those are secret Zionists,
maybe those are secret Democrats.
Yeah. All those always apply, especially when it's
something you don't you might not want to
consider. In this case, regardless of whether there's
violence, that doesn't then then mean that anybody
who is acknowledging the crimes being committed by
this administration or that ICE are committing on
a daily basis or the lies they're being
shown or in court being exposed for what
they're doing, that somehow those don't matter because
this person with pink hair did something violent,
it's childish, but it's easy.
Yes. Hold them accountable. Put them in jail
if they broke the law. But see, now
all of a sudden, just like we were
saying before in reverse with the trucker convoy,
that now they're making it all illegal because,
you know, red hats, they're dangerous. They're domestic
terrorists. They're anti Semites.
Yeah. Remember all that? It was really short
time ago. Now the same thing's being done
over here. All of a sudden, we need
to find a way to shut them down.
We need to deploy the military, not just
national guard to understand. Trump's executive order talks
about the military.
We'll talk about policy comitatus and what that
means and why I framed it the way
I did the title.
This is a really important development. And if
you think this is only about immigration, if
you think this is about protests and Democrats,
you are lost in the two party illusion.
And far too many people who seem to
know better still feel tapped into it. I
tend to think it's because it's profitable. I
can't know for sure what their intentions are,
but I know so many out there that
I see every day, that I know I've
talked with, that see through it, and yet
still pull back and tap into and stoke
the division, acting surprised when certain things happen
when nonetheless, it's always happening.
It's frustrating.
But recognize the chaos. Recognize how that's used.
And when Homan and others talk about how
we need to suppress speech,
whether from politicians or anybody else because it's
causing violence, is that not the exact same
thing we were fighting against the left?
See, we're trying to desperately or effort or,
I guess, relentlessly try to get people to
see that it's always like that, that it's
always one power structure trying to make you
always, you know, use the thing you hate
or that they tell you to hate or
manufacture
you into hating, that that using that to
attack your neighbor as opposed to the people
who are making you attack your neighbor or
who are using your division to execute certain
agendas. It's literally everywhere you look. So let's
start today with one quick shout out.
Was recently talked as you guys know with
the dwindling of truth clothing and the new
store we started, they're they're
talking about,
bulk sales. I thought it was worth pointing
out because they, like everybody else in this
field, are struggling. And the bottom line is
if these don't ultimately sell, they just the
more money is lost from their end. And
they've been selling
a lot of good content for for a
lot of different people in the in the
truth community. So if you're interested
in buying some TLAB content stickers, sure or
rather,
TLAB shirts, stickers, anything on the store, just
reach out to them. I I can't be
in between. They they'll be the ones to
talk to you about what deals they may
make. I do get a small percentage of
it, you know, as it's been reduced in
cost, but this still supports us. So if
you're interested in maybe buying a bunch of
them, they'd be really appreciative of that, and
it would help TLav. And maybe you could,
you know, turn around and sell them yourself.
I don't care. Do whatever you want with
them. But the bottom line is they're willing
to take bulk offers if that's interest if
somebody's interested. So reach out. Their information will
be on the website. Links included and on
the website right now.
So let's start with Epstein, I do think,
as an interesting point to discuss, and this
will obviously overlap with the Elon and Trump
kind of explosion that we're seeing, which I
do very much I mean, look. Let me
put it this way right at the gate
since this has been ongoing.
I honestly my my my genuine opinion about
this is that it's a little bit of
both. I said this on the IMA pot
recent discussion we had in regard to that
both can exist.
Clearly, I don't think these people really like
each other. Like, most of this cabinet are
I mean, there's so many examples of them,
you know, right before they got there saying
Trump's a grifter or Elon's an idiot or
he doesn't know this or that, and now
they're you know, then they got jammed together,
and a lot of us were saying ego
or, you know, whatever else. Or just looking
at Trump's past record with unprecedented nature, people
spinning off of his cabinet, it's clear that
this was something we thought was likely.
But just general information shows you that I
don't think they really like each other. So
that was obvious to consider that it might
end up that way. So that could be
the reality, and then they also could decide
to work together for a larger agenda, maybe
because Israel pays them both too or maybe
because they both like the technocratic agenda and
because they both like power over you. There's
always ways these align. I make the point
during COVID nineteen
where I don't think that every government is
all of the same mind of exactly what
they wanna do. They weren't all you know,
they're they're not all exactly one thing.
They all, in my opinion, would be happy
to take tools and mechanisms and enforcement
arms, things that could control your life. All
the different COVID nineteen technocratic things we're seeing,
they
they're drooling over it. Like, what's what China's
doing. They all see the power of how
that can be used, and maybe they pretend
it's for good, if you wanna think that.
I I don't think any government's out there
to protect you. The bottom line is you
saw them lockstep on certain things, but I
don't think at the end of the day
they were you know, they're insofar as they
can gain those things but still doing what
they want, and sometimes they butt heads, maybe
even go to war over it. But they're
still willing to align when it comes to
controlling you. Very important way to think about
that. And so, overall,
I think it's important to consider that maybe
they weren't
always together in a car in regards to
being partners or whatever, but they were together
when it came to whatever agenda was playing
out. And my point is I think that
still can apply. That whether they decided to
break apart because they hate each other because
it was all theater to hide what was
going on Palantir or maybe saddle Elon alone
with what Palantir was and what they did
with Doge and AI government and using your
personal data and what we're gonna get to
today, which I mean what I think actually
adds a whole another level
of whether or not there's a foreign entity
kind of dictating what this was. I have
the I'm of the mind that something just
happened
really quickly, actually, since the whatever just happened
in regard to them splitting and whatever's going
forward from there, I think that whatever just
took place through this administration, which we're gonna
touch on with Elon Musk secretly relaying information
from the White House,
that which is Washington Post, Daily Beast, and
a few others that have covered it,
that
the like I said, with the ethics pledges,
with the influence, the the the Doge discussion,
and these grooving silos, having access to just
unfettered personal information with no oversight or I
mean, all this stuff. And then all of
a sudden this breaks away.
I mean, I'm of the mind that whatever
it was just happened. I don't mean like
a one spot thing. I mean, that they
they there if something was happening, they did
that. And now their you know, point is
that let's just say, you know my mind.
I think Israel was literally reaching through these
people that they're funding through this government. It's
been going on for a decade or, excuse
me, a century.
But my point is, I shouldn't say it
that specifically, but they've been around that long,
but for a long time, the Israeli government
has been influential and overtaking this government. But
wondering whether or not they did so and
that the access there and, again, you can
consider China, consider just some technocratic Silicon Valley
entity. But I think that they accessed and
have control over many things, and that is
done. I'm not trying to be hyperbolic. I
just wanna be I want you to have
your mind where I think this is and
to where
now whatever actions they took for in the
interest of the technocratic control structure, your survey
of the data, your you know, the social
credit direction, that that's happened already. And I
just think that's important to consider. Now going
back to this, and we'll come to that
in a around what what the information using
Starlink that was able to fly out of
the White House overlap this point, which I
think is interesting.
You saw this with Musk tweeting about Donald
Trump being on the Epstein files. I only
include that because it's relevant to the point
today. Apparently, he deleted that.
And he says, mark this post for the
future. The truth will come out.
So that's relevant to some clips we're gonna
watch, but keep that in mind because that
is now deleted.
Musk post piles pressure on justice department to
release
Epstein files.
So this is a wash Wall Street Journal,
and it says Democrats join calls for Trump
appointees to release promised details from the federal
investigation into the disgraced financier. Now it's, of
course, possible that the Democrats,
maybe the ones that call for it aren't
guilty, and they there are some that are
there that are, and they wanna stop it,
of course. Is it possible that these Democrats
are guilty and they're calling for it because
they know they won't release it till they
look like they're innocent? Sure. All these things
are possible. What's also possible is that the
people that are saying this,
calling for it to be released are ones
that want to see that because they think
that there's something that hurts their enemies. And
the people that are not calling for it
to be released have a reason not to.
That's Oxom Occom's razor. The simplest explanation tends
to be the right one, all things considered.
Not always the case, but I think it's
interesting
that we're getting told from a bunch of
people in packed into the right side of
this conversation
that the Democrats are the ones that want
this don't want this to be released. Now
they're the ones that seem to be calling
for it more, and they're the ones saying
no, but we you know, pumping the brakes.
But at the same time, you've got a
thread from the right leaning commentators saying we
tricked them. We did this all to trick
them into calling for their release, and now
they're gonna be exposed. Kinda hard to make
that make sense with the way it's happening
thus far, but keep that in mind.
So
Nancy Mace is one of those people. One
of the most dishonest people in all of
this, in my opinion. She's very transparent, very,
you know, always on, always trying to project
some kind of a narrative and agenda, you
know, and very much tapped into the same
things we're talking about, the same pro Israel
blind genocide supporting kind of monster. And she
says Democrats all of a sudden
want to release the Epstein files, which there's
plenty of people on left and right that
have called for this before. It's always about
framing it as all or nothing because people
that want that to be the case, who
support her, will just pretend that's the reality.
There's no nuance in their mind. It's all
evil, pedophile,
deep state Democrats. Right? Except the reality is
there's a lot of deep pedophile, deep state
things throughout both sides of this paradigm if
you understand the full picture. But when you
always frame it all with nothing, it's easy
to fall in line. It's like reading it's
like watching your favorite soap opera or your
favorite reality TV show. Now it says, thank
you Donald Trump and Elon Musk, as if
they orchestrated this to execute this plan. Is
that possible? Sure.
Well played, gentlemen.
Game, set, match.
That's just so like, the point is if
that had happened and, like, there was a
conclusion to this, that would be an appropriate
statement. But to say it while it's still
fleshing out and it doesn't feel that's where
it's going, that feels like a desperate effort
to try to maintain some control over the
narrative, which is what these people need. I
said pathetic, desperate, and, of course, they will
never release the files, my opinion. So this
will age about as well as most of
what this manipulator says.
Here's another one, TC Drano. I'm sure you're
not gonna be shocked by the ones that
are presenting this stuff, and it says, Dembs
are walking right into the trap, which was
the kind of talking point of a lot
of these grifters that day. Democrats, I guess,
the account, the Democrats says kill the bill
and release the Epstein files.
Okay. So, like, if you think that they
are in those, then
what do you mean the trap? Like, you
think you trick them into calling for what
they know is going to it just seems
like a really poorly thought through argument.
I'm of the mind. They're all criminals, guys.
Just make sure you understand that. But this
just feels lazy. These people are completely tapped
into whatever I mean, these are
I mean, opportunists is even too light of
a word for this. But the the point
is, like, the cyst is you? Remember, I'm
holding the Epstein what what happened to phase
two, Drayna? What happened to phase two binders?
I you said phase one, and I made
a big point about that. It's clearly meant
to imply there was multiple phases.
Well, I guess we'll have to wait and
see.
Here is Caitlin Johnstone citing Dinesh D'Souza saying,
is this some sort of perverse scheme to
force the release of the Epstein files? How
great would it be to have a horde
of bad guys publicly exposed? Then Trump and
Elon break out the champagne.
Elon says, told you I could get the
Democrats to scream for the list. Laughter. Now
at least he's asking it as a question,
but it's still just the same old thing.
And she's Caitlin says, Trump supporters will spin
literally every single thing he does as a
brilliant four d chess maneuver against the deep
state. And to be clear, it's a different
style of turn, but the democrats do the
same thing for their god chosen
ideologues. It's the same as you it may
not be
the, you know, brilliant four d chess move
against the deep state, but it's some other
alternative of whatever they do will turn into
making it powerful for us or calling out
the other side. It's the two party illusion.
It's partisanship.
Wake up to it, guys. It's it's there's
never been a better time for those that
are new to this to start being honest
about how childishly dumb and cartoonish
the same thing every day is. All these
ridiculous people that we all somehow we all
know. We all see it. They're blindly cheerleading
for their team, and we allow that. Most
of you are somewhere in the middle. Stop
falling into those categories because they're popular, because
they're reach because they're shown as the ones
you're supposed to listen to.
Says he could show up at the press
conference eating a corpse of a baby, and
within minutes, they'd be calling it a devastating
blow to George Soros and the woke CIA.
Charlie Kirk says, let me get this straight.
Democrats tried to put Trump in prison for
seven hundred years. Did they?
I mean, there's a lot of narrative out
there, but what actually happened?
Take his business empire from him. Okay. What
happened?
Impeach him twice. What happened?
Take him off the ballot. What happened? And
censor him on all sensory okay. What happened?
There's a lot of movement there and a
lot of powerful people in government. You're telling
me not a single thing actually happened to
actually hold him accountable for crimes he actually
committed? I'm not speaking about any one thing
in particular. They're all criminals. If you can't
see that by now, then you're part of
the problem. The idea that this is somehow
that you can't at least consider that all
of that was in order to get people
like Charlie to think that they're on your
side because reverse psychology apparently is the thing
of the day. Like, we're stuck back in
kindergarten. Like, literally, people are being tricked by
the most basic. He's the bat he's the
other thing, so that means he must be
the other. Like, basic reverse psychology.
But it says all while they were sitting
on the info that Trump was on the
Epstein list? This is total and complete nonsense.
Well, it you're saying that because you don't
think it adds up. That very statement, even
if exactly the truth, could obviously be true.
The point is, no. It is just that
it is the childishly naive argument that there
are only two parties, and just one of
them is the so called deep state.
This is what's complete nonsense. There is just
one government, and you are clearly on its
side against the people.
This false binary is over. The point is
if you can't recognize by now or at
least the possibility, which I think is based
on the most more evidence of the conversation
than anything else, that these people are on
the same side when it comes to the
main arguments and that when that comes out,
well, that'll expose the government. And so the
government does not want that to happen. Boy,
they were talking about intelligence and and a
thousand different ways this will overlap with things
they're all a part of. But But Charlie
wants you to think that somehow because it
didn't happen, therefore, we know Trump's innocent.
We know the Democrats are bad. It's just
lazy thinking, which is you listen to these
guys debate. They're lazy.
Here is a clip Michael Tracy shared. Let's
watch it of Cash on Joe Rogan.
Oh, if I had a shred
me, Cash Patel, had a shred of evidence,
the Russia gate guy, the Jan six guy,
the COVID origins guy, had a shred of
evidence that this guy was Don't you love
how he labels himself as all those things?
Right? Cash is those things? Really?
It's just so frustrating how people just, like,
jump in the lay. Like, these
are government connected
entities who are these are mainstream,
and they're acting like they were the ones
there, the guy talking about that. They're the
ones origin. Like, they're lying to you about
almost every single one of those conversations,
And every one of them, they pull a
punch, whether it's January 6 or COVID nineteen
or any of it, especially COVID nineteen. Half
their their own base is calling them out.
But it's just funny that he sits there
in front of Joe and calls himself the
guy for those things. It's just there are
people that will fall for that. That's how
simple it is today.
People like Cacturne. The murder? I would be
the guy to bring this case. This guy
was murdered. I would be the guy to
bring this case hard and fast. And Oh,
great. Great argument.
You know me. I'm the good guy. So
if it was here, you would know. Can
we go now? Are we done? Right. So
you lean into emotional suggestive argument. The the
idea that he's on my team, therefore, I
know.
No. That's you're in kindergarten level if you're
falling for something like that. I would do
even doing press conferences every week on it.
Mhmm. The guy. Or you're lying about it
because you were told to, and you know
your lane. Right, bud? That's what I'm asking
people to play out to their logical conclusion.
I'm not Comey. I'm not McCabe. I'm not
the guy that was in the seat before.
I have a wildly different background.
I've been put None of that means anything
in regard to whether or not you're lying
or how about you're blackmailed? How about you're
we're talking about a monolithic,
you know, multiple different things if you want
my honest opinion about it, but a massive
entity or entities that can
turn the world against you. You don't think
for one second that he wouldn't be told
if you do that we'll murder your entire
family, he wouldn't get up there and lie.
I'm not trying to give a pass. I'm
just trying to make it the most extreme
possible. Or maybe he's just not the guy
you think he is. Or maybe he wants
to go along with Trump administration, which literally
is laying out the idea that you either
lie for us or you're not part of
the team, which and not really much different
than the other dishonest government. But the point
is,
obviously,
obviously, he could just be saying that. Or
maybe they convince him that showing this will
hurt the country, and therefore I have to
lie because I love America. You don't think
these basic things could have convinced someone like
that? You know it would.
Out the truth my entire career.
Why would I risk all of it on
this guy? Power, money, influence, control? I believe
he passed the letter. Oh, wait. I I
believe you. I just think that, you know,
the problem is
we've been
fuming on this conspiracy for so long. And
it we love conspiracies, don't we? As a
as a country, there's so much How many?
You know, they make JFK tapes. Come on.
So I I'm I'm How much can you
talk about what you've seen? Not yet.
Just just what I've told you. Can you
say you've seen anything?
I mean, again, personal opinion, and this is
just me, gut instinct.
And this is I mean, you talk there's
a lot of people out there. Charlie Robinson
made the same point. The point is you
these people, the way that they look, the
way they're fortifies, their their uncomfortable seat, the
way that they're sitting, the way that they're
moving, You ask anybody who does this for
a living. That's never, in my opinion, proof
that they're lying. But it get every red
flag. Like that interview where he was sitting
at the high chair and Bongino, they look
like they were like, even their own followers
said it was a hostage video. Right? They
look like they are
concerned.
Completely my opinion. Totally. Can you say you've
seen anything?
See no. That's the point that there's
nothing in there. Like, in Alright. So he
starts by saying I can't really get into
it, but then goes, but there's nothing there.
I mean, that very answer is ridiculous.
As I'll show even Tim Dillon was having
a heyday about it. Video. You you guys
would be bored. You talking about the video
of the murder or the the suicide? Suicide.
Except that there was no cameras or they
told you it broke down or they had
all all these different narratives are conflicting every
day. What about the video of from the
island? Oh, that's the sorry. So you're talking
about Tetera. Yes. So Sorry. So yeah. So,
again, we're gonna give you
everything we can, and people have to remember.
Oh, okay. We're not gonna redactimize
women. We're not gonna put that shit back
out there. It's not happening because then he
wins. Not doing it. I'll give you one
that Tim says in the interview or the
clip he makes next. So you couldn't just
blur their faces out
or in any way? Didn't you tell didn't
Bon Bon Giotto see who's gonna clean it
up for you?
That argument doesn't fly. You wanna hate me
for it? Fine.
Again, logical
play out. If there was a video
of some guy
or gal committing
felonies
on an island, and I'm in charge,
don't you think you'd see it? See what
I'm saying? That's a childish argument.
Like, if you're a grown up in a
room full of people that are discerning adults
that, you know, that that know what happens
in politics
or just even the most basic I mean,
or somebody who just works with normal people.
If someone goes, I know. Trust me.
You go, okay. Well, maybe I shouldn't. I
mean, am I crazy? Or, you know, that
I if I was the guy, then I
would have done it like this. That's not
you. You could say, okay, he could be
telling the truth, but that's not convincing. That's
no that's just him saying so. He might
as well just say, I I'm not lying
to you. That's all that he just did
right there. You could go off for forty
five minutes about how if I had it,
I would do this, and you know me.
I'm not the kind of guy. His answer
is trust me. That's his answer. And maybe
that's enough for you. Maybe that's enough for
people that think you should blindly trust politicians.
Not me, though.
If you have access to it. If I
have it. Period. I'm sorry. Let let me
play this through because this is part that
he was making fun of too. It's very
cryptic and, I think, meant to be confusing.
That that was the point he was laughing
at. Felonies
on an island,
and I'm in charge.
Don't you think you'd see it?
If you have access to it. If I
have it, Period. If I have it. If
I have it.
So
Where else would it be?
Right. What? If you have it. Right. But
you can't say that you have it.
No. We're giving you everything we have. So
far.
Everything we have so far is Have you
guys gone over Where else would it be?
You see what I'm saying? Like, that's not
an argument somebody who's intelligent makes. Any oh,
I almost just cussed really loudly.
Anywhere else, man. How about literally anywhere else?
Because if it's not here, it could be
anywhere else. It could be hidden somewhere. It
could be in government.
I mean, I don't have to make a
joke, but it could be anywhere. Where else
would it be? Like, that is the kind
of argument that gets blind followers to go
along. I mean, you don't even that's my
point. People that would go along with that
are already on your team before you started
talking. All the video that's available? Yeah. That's
what I'm telling you. That's what takes so
much damn time. Video that's everything we have
so far is Have you guys gone over
all the video that's available? Yeah. That's what
I'm telling you. That's what takes so much
damn time. Right.
And And is there video from the island?
Not of what you want.
Do you get the sense this guy is
not even looking at anything?
Like, literally, this is the stew the clown
they roll out to take the to, you
know, the the clapping seal to take your
attention away from what's going on? I mean,
legitimately, I'm just asking the question because if
you the white the responses he's giving give
me the indication that he's not even involved.
That's just my gut feeling. Like, it just
seems very strange the way you're responding to
that. Like, every single answer he has violent?
Thing we have so far is Have you
guys gone over all the video that's available?
Yeah. That's what I'm telling you. That's what
takes so much damn time. So, you know,
you have teams of people going over this
stuff. I I just don't buy it. Right.
And And is there video from the island?
Not of what you want.
The the people out there have
filled the void with can't wait to see
x, y, or z. Right. Speculation. And I'm
like, here's the other thing I've been asking
for. Right? Open and to be clear, that's
not the truth.
Bondi and others have constantly floated this bombastic
idea, which is probably the truth, that there's
tons of evidence in video of terrible things
because that they thought would get the they
get they get they get you rolling and
get support for the team because we're gonna
expose all this stuff. And that's how they
think. And this is this is not my
opinion. There's a clear track record that in
probably one of the worst I've seen in
a long time of this administration, I think
it's because the people that were chosen for
the reasons they were. A Bondi, a Gnome,
a Hegseth. These people aren't that smart. They're
not very they're they're the worst. Like, if
we're gonna talk about a meritocracy,
they are not the best person for this
job. They're the most loyal,
the most blindly adherent to whatever you're told
to do. That makes sense, and maybe that's
what you want. But my point is that
these people have constantly said whatever is they
don't think through. They're not long term players.
They are screaming what makes sense in the
moment and being contradicted thirty seconds later. Trump
does it too. Maybe there's a design. Maybe
that's because we're being destroyed. I don't know.
But I think that's quite obvious.
If you have information on this,
call us.
Tell us.
The best resource we have is the American
people in the world. Right. Get me the
tail numbers. Get me the flight you know,
get me new information, and I will run
that down.
So this narrative might not be accurate that
there's video of these guys doing this.
Exactly.
Is it possible that the video was taken
and destroyed?
Well, now what are we talking about?
Video of what? I mean, is there nobody
has argued that we know, like, this is
what we know exists. I'm sure somebody's making
claims. Most of us are going, we want
evidence.
You keep telling us you have evidence that
you can tell he killed himself. Prove it.
It's just very, very simple. If you're convinced,
then make that clear. Not some video you
claim of him, you know, rather listen, if
it's a video showing him leave or opening
the door and there's nobody else in there,
that's not gonna convince anybody because what happened
before that. It's just late. You already know
where this is going. You know, there's so
many overlaps to this, and the point is
now you're trying to make it about what
do you say again? Be accurate that there's
video of these guys doing this.
Exactly.
Is it possible
that video was taken and destroyed?
Of course. Well, you're talking about, what, decades
worth of stuff. Right? Remember, we have what
we have pursuant to lawful.
Why couldn't he just say yes? Because, I
mean, I think he's trying to cultivate something
very specific. Of course, it's possible it's destroyed.
That was one of the things we talked
about. Is that I mean, why wouldn't they
have already why would they be holding all
of this? Why would they have all this
other than for some, you know, blackmail operation?
And if this is information that it put
them personally, they would have destroyed it in
my opinion. Or unless there's somebody else running
the show, unless it's just sitting in Israel
right now, and we and they you know,
I'm seeing there's a lot more to this.
So that answer seems strange.
Search warrants and authorities from the case
that was done,
however many years ago was done. That's what
we have. If other people have other stuff
and they wanna give it to us,
bring it. What are you talking about? I
mean, I just think about how crazy it
is that you guys were the ones that
set the tone. You told us that you
had this mountain, all this stuff to go
through, give us time. We have the files.
We and this is the response that, like,
you're acting like you just you know, there's
nothing there. So if you got more, you
are the one you guys are like the
like, think about the idea of pretending like
you're this kind of inept in the middle
you know, you got something centered our way.
We're just dealing with what we have in
front of us. You're one of the leading
intelligent well, whether you are or not, but
the Israel The US and Israeli intelligence apparatus
is not a small thing. I just think
that is insane to pretend that he just
needs Joe from the corner to send him
a videotape that he got. Where would he
get anything from?
Why would any American have information about what
happened to that jail cell, which is the
only thing we're ever really talking about? I
guess the broad point is about, you know,
what the claim of victims or rather the,
you know, the people that were involved that
aren't being point I shouldn't not victims, but,
people that Epstein and the rest worked with.
Right? So if you're being what's the point
from the very beginning, if you're being accused
of a crime or trafficking, who did they
traffic to? How can you prove he did
this if you can't prove if you don't
if there's not a a a well, it's
not victim. It's a a a customer.
Right? I mean, it's it there's nothing. Not
a single allegation, not a single point, no
data,
you know, the whole thing across the board.
This
is not just my opinion.
Most of the right part of the conversation
feels the exact same way, which is why
I feel like they're spinning out right now.
Have you guys reviewed everything that you have?
Almost. Like, where that's I mean, yes. We
have and What?
You see my point, guys? That is a
classic sign. Right? That's dishonesty.
Almost. Or yes. You're correct.
It's like it just feels really bad at
this, guys.
That's I mean, yes. We have, and now
we're figuring out stuff, and they wanna give
it to us. Oh, and watch his eyes
when he makes that answer.
Brilliant.
Have you guys reviewed everything that you have?
Almost. Like, we're that's I mean, yes. We
have, and now we're figuring out
how to
Right. Put it out.
You know, I it's I'm not I'm not
trying to re you know, I'm not
psychic.
Everything in me screaming that that guy is
dishonest.
Everything.
But that's my opinion. You guys can decide
for yourselves.
Now Michael Tracy says all it takes is
a friendly visit from the FBI director to
convince Joe Rogan that Epstein killed himself, and
there are no compromising videos of powerful people
for Epstein Island.
Just like that, the deep state gets a
makeover as a benign force for podcast storytelling.
You know, the idea is
again, if you don't remember the story, like,
the the
the basic premise that this guy was able
to do this
in in the circumstances
he was in is it's absurd.
And let's not forget the the autopsy that
the guy I forget was the
I almost I almost had it. I forgot.
The something hyoid bone hyoid bone, I think.
Right? Hyoid, I think, was what it was.
Remind me if I'm wrong on that. But
the point was the the claim was that
there's no way you could do that with
what he could the claim that he killed
himself. That guy was very clear about that.
He stood by that. No. This is the
evidence shows not killing him. They don't care
about that. Or the idea that there the
the materials for the bedsheets supposed to use
are basically paper and would tear or the
idea that he didn't have high enough effort
to do like, the idea that he could
lean and choke himself, it's just wrong. So
only thing that makes sense is whether somebody
did that, whether he's not alive, or somebody
helped him.
Basically said, do this,
and we won't kill your family or we
won't or whatever the pressure point is. You
know, there's the idea that you can pretend
like this was just him killing himself, that's
why nobody trusts this because that's that's that's
like saying,
Warren report, nine eleven report, we know they're
true. Everybody everywhere knows they're not true. They
know we know they're not true, but they
just leave it there because they pretend that
we're wrong. They pretend the mainstream you're the
way the conspiracy theorist in the corner. I
think it was something like 70% of people
when the Warren report came out about JFK,
at the time, didn't believe it. Same thing
with the nine eleven report. Same thing with
the covert. They don't believe you, and they
just pretend that you're
in the corner alone. David says, Rogan and
MAGA media mob have always been frauds.
Hasn't someone been given so much s h
I t for saying so for so long?
But it's true all the same. Rogan pushed
his mate Musk with softball questions and arse
kissing and then endorsed Trump with softball questions
and arse kissing. The three of them deserve
each other.
Now here's Bennie Johnson with Luke Kudowski.
Sure missed the days back when he was
doing journalism personally, and it says,
Luke drops a bombshell.
We will never get the Epstein files. They
aren't at the FBI. They're with Mossad. And
now he didn't so what's funny is that's
Bennie Johnson's statement. That's not even what he
said. They'll watch it. He says, I think
they're with the government. They're with the CIA.
They're with Masa. They're with MI six, broadly
as one kind of concept. They're somewhere with
intelligence. Of course, Bennie Johnson is just trying
to get clicks and shares, which is what
he does for a living, and misquotes him.
But watch his eye. Look at his face
when you're watching this.
It's almost like as he's saying, it's kinda
like you see him in his face going,
I I don't know. This is this feels
like it's bad for Trump. I'm not sure
how I'm supposed to respond here. My personal
opinion. As Davoo says, gatekeeper shills, but listen
to what he has to say, and you
tell me what you think about this.
We ever gonna get it?
Nope. I don't think we will. And, that's
the kind of sad realization.
I I think
listen. I think as soon as Donald Trump
was elected,
you know, a lot of the files, one,
weren't kept. You can't you can't expect criminals
to, one, incriminate themselves. I don't think the
files are at the FBI. I think they're
Okay. So after he was elected, so the
implication being Democrats destroyed it.
Are we really doing that?
One of these people's right there. I damn
well know you know better than that. The
idea of this two party game, the Democrats
were trying to hide it because they're the
guilty ones. It's silly.
I mean, it's like the most childish thing
in this conversation, but it people, it's reality
TV.
I just can't get past how silly that
is. This argument that somehow they would destroy
I mean, and, again, what what you're saying
is somehow that I I mean, there's it's
all hypothetical.
The bottom line is if we don't get
anything, then what does that say about Cash
and Bondi and Trump and everybody else who's
been telling you they have stuff to show
you? You see what I'm saying? Like, it
just this it there's so many r arguments
for people like this that are clearly tapped
into the Trump Trump promotion side of the
conversation
that
I just that you that you know they
know better, that they would say that at
the end of the day, the argument doesn't
hold water
in in a lot of different ways, but
I I'll I'll leave it there. It's water.
The CIA. Right? I think they're at m
you can't you can't
expect criminals to one incriminate themselves. I don't
think the files are at the FBI. I
think they're at the CIA. Right? I think
they're at MI five. I think they're at
most, at the Mossad headquarters. Right? I think
they're at different places in different locations, but
even when they are there, they're not officially
writing dear diary tales. I don't think the
files are at the FBI. I think they're
at the CIA. Right? I think they're at
m I five. I think they're at most,
at the Mossad headquarters. Right? I think they're
at different places in different locations. But even
when they are there, they're not officially writing,
dear diary, today, we stole this many children
from this high school, and then we procured
them to whoever it might be. I don't
think they're
doing that. I I thought legitimately
that there was a whistleblower.
I thought that there was someone within the
the old administration that said, I got all
the documents. I got all the receipts. I
got some proof here.
You know, that didn't happen here. Okay. So
the only implication there is that you're being
lied to by the Trump administration.
You tell me we're missing something.
If we're being told all of that and
what you're saying is correct, then the Trump
administration is lying to you. You have to
piece those together and recognize that there is
just as much evidence as for left and
right in this conversation,
despite all the efforts to frame it anywhere
else they can, including Trump himself.
Very clearly implicated so many times over with
Epstein that people just wanna try to avoid.
We got a letter saying, please give us
your stuff, and the FBI is not gonna
incriminate themselves. So I think the administration is
stuck in a very tough position right now
because they kind of overpromised here. The FBI
made sure that they they didn't get anything.
The one FBI agent that actually held information
back was was actually forced to retire.
Yeah. And who is he? Where did he
go to jail?
Right. So you now we're just towing the
lines of a narrative that was given to
explain why they didn't have access. It was
the one d o the one democrat holdover.
Why is he in prison then? If you're
telling us literally this guy was the reason
we didn't get we needed and I'm not
talking about Luke here. I'm talking about what
they've been there was the statement from bonding
the rest. The only two things are possible
that they took over and they had access
to this stuff, which is what the narrative
was, and they were going through it. Or
it was somebody else that sabotaged it, and
they didn't do anything about it. Or I
guess that it's not true at all.
I don't know why in the world, especially
people like this, would take at face value
the narrative of a government.
Seems like we know better than that. And
then he got a, you know, a round
of applause
from all of the people as he was
leaving the office, which I thought was just
extremely weird here as I think there there
should have been a bigger investigation and potential
obstruction of of justice charges here. Well, the
only way to make sense of that is
that is that they let that go. Now
why would that make sense? Because it's one
government, and they're all implicated. That's my opinion.
If we were taking this seriously.
I I I think some people are are,
you know,
and and this is why the rumors of
of of a conspiracy
are so very vast here, sadly. And I
I think we have every right to be
skeptical, and I have and I think we
have every right to believe that this is
a bigger conspiracy than we even imagined it
to be.
Well, kind of saying saying a lot of
nothing. But I think at the end of
the day,
the problem is that there are people trying
to explain away
why it's okay to keep trusting this government,
which is what they do every single day.
And so I agree.
Here's what Tim Dillon had to say, which,
you know, it's kinda this is the kind
of stuff that becomes, like, how in the
world everyone's not calling this out. And that's
what I mean. You have the people that
are on one side of this that are
choosing to look away from anything. Now, yes,
you have people on the other side of
this who feel this is unique to the
right who are all jumping on board. That
doesn't make it false.
They're they're the same thing in reverse. They
will choose to ignore it when it happens
to their side. I don't think that's the
majority of the conversation. So these people should
be disregarded in regard to the relevance to
where this goes, whether or not it's the
majority because the facts are right in front
of you. Just recognize how often the partisans
will play that same game. Patel talking about
why they can't,
put the Epstein stuff out because it will
revictimize
the women.
We're not gonna revictimize
women. What? We're not gonna put that shit
back out there. It's not happening because then
he wins. Not doing it. Hold on. Stop
that for a minute. It's the craziest thing
I've ever heard.
Why wouldn't you just blur the victim? If
there was a video
of some guy
or gal committing
felonies
But there is.
And I'm in charge,
don't you think you'd see it? Yes. But
that's that's why everyone's confused.
Pam Bondi said there were videos. She's the
attorney general. She goes, there's hundreds of hours
of video. That's a quote from Pam, but
get the Pam Bondi quote up by the
videos. There are tens of thousands of videos
of Pepsi with children or child porn, and
there are hundreds of victims. So that's Pam
Bondi. Now let's go to Kesha Patel who
goes,
so if there were things let's go. Kesha
Patel, everyone. Alright. So Kesha has been caught
lying many times. Pam Bondi, a lot.
I mean, in regard to the the lot
I mean, whether it's Garcia, which we'll get
into, or countless other examples.
And, again, if you can't be if you
can't be honest about that, it's not even
it's it's blatant misinformation,
and it's not unique to left and right.
But the reality is she's been caught so
many times over lying about people that are
being arrested and claiming people are criminals when
they're not. I mean, or or claiming everyone
you deport. I mean, you guys have seen
the show. Hopefully, you know what's going on.
My point is
she could have been lying about that to
make it seem like she was breaking news
and we're changing everything, and then she did
she just didn't factor in that you might
look stupid when that doesn't come to pass,
or it is the truth, and now he's
covering it up.
All of that's possible.
Recognize from a nonpartisan perspective how that's usually
what's going on.
If there was a video, don't you think
you'd see it?
If you have access to it. If I
have it. Period. If I have it. If
I have it.
You got it? Where where it is? Where
is it? Where else would it be? Where
right. Where is it? If you have it.
Right. Right. But you can't say that you
have it. This is who's on Get up
the famous joke who's on
The fellow player base for Saint Louis. Who?
The guy on base. Who is on
What are you asking me for? I'm not
asking you. I'm telling you who is on
I'm asking you who's on Now stop that.
Now go back to Patel.
Where else would it
be? Right. If you have it. Right. But
you can't say that you have it.
No. We're giving you everything we have so
far. Who's on
What are you asking me for?
Now here's another clip
Ryan put out here, which is basically the
juxtaposition of the two statements, which I think
is better to look at.
Logical
play out. If there was a video of
some guy or gal committing
felonies
on an island and I'm in charge, Don't
you think you'd see it? Tens of thousands
of videos
of Epstein
with children or child porn,
and there are hundreds of victims.
And no one victim will ever get released.
It's just the volume, and that's what they're
going through right now. The FBI is diligently
going
So did she lie, or is he lying?
Maybe they're both lying somehow. Wouldn't surprise me.
You just have to recognize
how on brand this is for the US
government. It's just and these people are especially
ridiculous. I you know, these people I don't
even think the person in Bonnie's position or
her in particular
is aware that she's being misled. I think
I don't even think it matters. It's like
the like the White House press secretary, KJ
P or Leave It. They just they repeat
what they're told. And I think that's how
the Trump administration currently operates as I'll point
out as we get closer in a minute.
In regard to the Garcia point, as you
as in regard to Bonnie in particular, that
people are being pushed out because they simply
go, this is incorrect.
What about the I'm not this is not
true about what they said. There's there's what
about due process? You're fired. You're not doing
what we want. You're zealously
fighting for your client as they framed. And
now the reality is coming out regardless that
they didn't know they're getting it's but the
point is, if you don't tow the line,
even if you know they're wrong, you get
pushed out. So people then learn from that.
Whether on a global scale in, like, manufacturing
consent or in a government and their administration,
People then start to learn how they're supposed
to act. And there's always no shortage of
people that are hungry for power, usually, who
are, you know, not that bright, not that
versed on a lot of things, but they'll
sure as hell try really hard and lie
just the way you like.
And let's not forget, by the way, Jeffrey
Epstein invested with Peter Thiel, which will point
out a couple of overlapping things in health
and Palantir as we go forward. Just think
that's relevant to highlight how much this all
completely interlocks. We should not,
ignore the possibility,
but this
is one of the many reasons this whole
thing's being held back. Because Peter Thiel and
Palantir are, what, controlling
you know, are a very powerful, influential part
of whatever they're currently building. And you know
what I think. But there's a lot of
possibilities.
But don't you think if I had it
that you'd see it? If I had it,
you would know. Okay. Then we're good to
go. Not like somebody this powerful and this
influential couldn't ruin your life if you didn't
do what you were told. Right?
I mean, I it's not I I it's
not even what I think is happening. I'm
just trying to point out that it's absurd
for people to take these things at face
value.
Jones tags this and says, Kash Patel asked
if Joe if he had access to the
Epstein files in reference to Trump Musk online
feud. Kash won't comment. Literally says on the
show, I know my lane, and that ain't
it.
Kinda not something you want from an FBI
director to stay in their lane when it
comes to this kind of conversation. You're supposed
to be going after what's right and wrong,
the law,
exposing crime.
You're staying in your lane,
then you're not doing that because these people
are your superiors. And if they're doing it
the point is if the president broke the
law, they're supposed to care about that. You
damn well know, left or right, that's not
how this works today. But Jones says, why
is the FBI director,
who I support,
that seemed unnecessary, but very clearly for a
reason,
destroying himself in front of the world. What
a weird thing to say. You have a
guy who's being called out by your entire
team, and I support.
I just feel like there's a clear f.
I simply said, who I support.
I said post a clown emoji if there's
someone in the room with you, Alex.
Just seems like a weird thing to say.
Here's the clip.
Since we were talking about fake news, this
is gonna come up because it's been going
on since we've been recording here. Uh-oh.
Elon and Trump seem to be in a
little bit of a spat, Joe. You wanna
check the tweet that Elon just put out
a little bit ago? Time to drop the
really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the
Epstein files. That's the real reason they have
not been made public. Have a nice day.
Jesus Christ.
I'm not participating
in any of that conversation
with Elon. Have a nice day, d j
d. So much dig gets thrown away. They're
going back and about different things and Yeah.
Listen. He was disappointed in Elon.
Yeah. I just told him to leave. Jesus
Christ. That's a crazy thing to say. How
does he know? Does he know that Donald
Trump is in the Epstein file? And, look,
you obviously know because a child could factor
this logic through that he could know for
a million different reasons. Maybe because he was
there too, maybe because Donald told him, maybe
because he has access to things nobody else
does, because he has access to every data
point in the effing
government. Whether I mean, let's let's be real.
The idea is it's there's a lot of
ways that he could if that was the
case. I mean, it's just as likely that
he did that just to pressure Trump to
back down maybe because it was 12. So,
man, who there's all sorts of possibilities.
To me, right now, the point is the
way that they respond to these things. So
does he have access to the FGM files?
I don't know how he would, but I'm
just staying out of the Trump, Elon thing
that's way outside my lane. Are they doing?
I know my lane, and that ain't it.
I just don't What? I mean How embarrassing.
Understand he owns Twitter.
I think it's bad for your mental health.
Ultra methyl
plain blue is now available in sealed capsules,
supercharged organic
that's crazy.
Ultra bugles.
That's just I just think that's hilarious. You'll
never see me doing that, guys, no matter
what. But here,
next point
oh, wait. Did I
have that up twice?
Oh, looks like I did. How did I
do that?
That's weird.
And then the last one,
here's what Katru put out.
Most of the influencers on Twitter are rich
kids. I don't know how you possibly know
that. And they're and they've never done anything
else. Again, just he's just framing a narrative
for you the way he wants you to
think, you know, it's just people that it's
it's just it's amazing that either the hubris,
the idea that you somehow know this thing.
These are just random followers, you know, that
are blind. You know, they I mean, I'll
I mean, I take it back, though. You
get 3,000,000 followers on this platform, especially with
the kind of influence around the, you know,
the sycophant influence of Elon's, you know, whatever
you wanna call it. You gain a lot
from that. They're probably making lots of money,
and they probably have lots of influence in
ways you can't even imagine. It's wild. We
talked about Loomer and what she claims she
made on x. I mean, they're making $100,000
a month if you believe what she said.
That's just that's just it's a metro I
don't know. That's insane. The bottom line is
he says that there's lots of influencers, and
I see somehow knows their demographic. I'm just
an old working class country boy who got
lucky.
One thing about us, old country boys, is
you still can't BS us.
Yeah. Stupid thing to say. I I see
you get lied to and lying about things
more than anybody on this platform. But it
says, the last few years, I became friends
with Cash and Dan Bongino. Over the years,
they've never lied to me once.
I mean or maybe you don't know they've
lied to you. And it says, I have
a good BS detector, and I trust both
of them. Again, remember what Free Prince said?
Trusting people in politics is the most naive
and ignorant thing you could possibly say out
loud. And it says, there are so many
frauds and liars in our government, but trust
me,
they're not two of them. See, there's a
cascading level of, like, please
just pull her have faith in us because
we're the right team
that you get the lawyer loom or Laura
loom or the rest of it all at
the same time. Like, Trump took a bullet
from you. You better support him. Like, this
is what's happening right now. It's very hard
to watch. These clumsy effort, like, this is
sick of either the kind of thing that
would be representative of being a sick of
fan or somebody who's being
directed
to say similar things to circle the wagons
when you guys are losing support.
Trust me. It says TeamSport politics. And here's
an example that Decentral News put out. Here's
he wrote this in 2024. Dear crybaby Democrats
and loser rhinos, one way or another, Trump
is going to get Matt Gaetz in, and
he will be your next AG or not.
Oh, and and and now and now you
just fought the one he did pick even
though you didn't you know, same thing. Fake
news idiots believe
they can drive a wedge between Trump and
Elon Musk who's hilarious, and now you hate
him. Now you think he's a moron because
he just said so. You see, these people
aren't unique. There's nothing sacred.
They will fly along with whatever the current
thing is because that's what they do.
Can't wait for Trump's new AG and FBI
director to raid Obama, Biden, Hillary, Hunter, and
Pelosi's house.
Yeah. How's that going? How's that what about
Gates? What about what about any number of
yeah.
You don't care about those things, which either
you do you do and you're not saying
it or you don't and
you're, you know, any number of things. But
the bottom line,
it's very dishonest what's going on in that
field. And I think a lot of it
is covering something to make it as broad
as possible. You know I have specific opinions
on that. But overall,
I think that there's whether it is a
foreign government, whether it is some tech Silicon
Valley thing, whether it's an AI entity. I
mean, there's lots of possibilities.
I think it's very clear that something just
shifted in this whole dynamic.
What you know, the rolling out of the
Palantir database, which has already been there, but
through, like, the acknowledgment
of this not the, hey. We've had surveillance
for twenty years, you bunch of democrat weirdos.
No. No. No. That's yes. We have. That's
not what this is. Any damn will know
it. That argument doesn't hold any water. The
reality is this is an an unprecedented
level with artificial intelligence with I mean, and,
really,
the unsiloed access of all of it in
one basic location. I mean, there's so many
ways this is beyond the pale, and they
know that. They're just trying to defend their
team.
Gotta love at least their dedication, I guess.
But my point is that there's something that's
going on here. I've talked about with the
ethics pledges. I've talked about the idea of
just foreign government influence.
So all that considered. You don't have to
believe what I think what I you know,
my opinion is, but just recognize that regardless
of what it is, something like
this, it clearly indicates a problem.
Like I said before when we talk about
this, if whether you wanna think of Israel
or China in that context or, you know,
Silicon Valley, the point is just at least,
try to get what I'm saying from this.
Whether or not you can prove who or
what, the idea is that this is indicative
of some very real problem. And that what
again, I could just be,
you know, kind of an oligarch takeover of
this country, a coup in a slight way
that we don't a soft coup for power
change. You know? I
just think something massive happened here, and I
think what we're seeing is the selling out
of Americans in every possible way under the
guise of somehow securing American interest,
which is kinda typical for this government. But
this is a
republican platform daily beast. Musk's Doge goons surreptitiously
transmitted
reams of White House data.
Now it says Elon Musk goons at
Doge transmitted a large amount of data, all
of it undetected,
using a Starlink Wi Fi terminal they installed
on top of the White House according to
new reports.
Starlink is a satellite Wi Fi service owned
and operated by Elon Musk and SpaceX.
The Doge goons installed oh, and by the
way,
Bannon was just calling for SpaceX to be
taken by the government using the Defense Production
Act.
You know, it's hard not to see I
mean, if it is a feud, it's getting
pretty intense. If not, there's this is, like,
I
if that happens, an orchestrated kinda change of
power. Like, SpaceX, we talked about on the
panel. I mean, it's you know, there's no
decoupling these things. So it's interesting overlap to
that, and maybe that's all by design. Worth
considering. Point is the Doge goons installed
a Starlink device at the White House in
March with the sign off of Donald Trump's
administration, but against concerns raised by security officials.
So the same thing happening from the beginning
of this administration. Whether it's using off-site locations
or personal computers
or,
you know, nothing in the transition team, no
ethics pledges, like, a thousand ways that we've
already seen have consequences
that open the door to manipulation, if not
allowance of outside influence.
The point is we've already seen this, as
we'll point out again in a with Waltz
and the the TeleMessage
signal archive app that's an Israeli intelligence entity
that literally is relaying what they're saying in
the White House in the inner circle back
to Israel?
That's a public story. Like, they they they
got covered by the signal gate discussion that
he somehow was using signal, and that's insecure.
No. No. That wasn't the story. He was
using TeleMessage to archive the signal messages of
the inner circle, and that was being relayed
back to Israel.
I mean, we'll come back to this. It's
it's a very important story. The signal clone
that Trump admin used was hacked.
It's just it's amazing how that got the
lesser part of the story, but you know
why. Because there's people who are coordinating and
controlling through the two party illusion what we
see and what we care about.
The point,
knowing this and knowing that influence, you have
to wonder what was being relayed into whom.
It says,
the officials in charge of protecting the White
House's communications were not informed of the installation
ahead of time.
At this time at the time, Doge and
install at the time, Doge said installing Starlink
was intended to address connection dead zones
on the White House compound.
Kinda seems like a flimsy argument when I
mean, I guess it's possible.
Alright. Let's just even say it's real that
there are dead zones. Like, it feels like
there should have been at very least a
pretty severe security check with some new technology
installed by somebody who's got, you know, a
a leash around his neck tying back to
Netanyahu. I mean, I think or whatever you
wanna look at. I just find it very
interesting. Now is that because that it's just
like, well, it's our team, it's okay. Or
they do it for a very obvious lacking
of security reason. My point is it doesn't
make sense.
Or at the very least, it's just wildly
incompetent, and maybe both are being played. Maybe
both exist. However, it says the insider suggested
that the move was intended to bypass White
House systems that track the transmission of data
with names and time stamps and secure it
from
it was says
and, track the transmission of data with names
and time stamps and secure it from spies.
Interesting overlap, by the way, with the spy
conversation we'll come back to.
We just talked about this alleged spy,
22 years old,
ex grocery clerk. Not this guy, by the
way. This is the guy, believe that or
not, believe it or not, who has pulled
in to the internal
intelligence apparatus in the Trump administration.
And then our and then, again, Germany,
I can't officially confirm that, but the narrative
seems to be that Germany was where this
went. It's just a US ally we talked
about. Remember that?
The the information seems to be developing that
it was Germany, which to me might as
well just be Israel, but that's my personal
opinion. The point is that he gave internal
information to Germany.
This guy is another
Trump supporter
guy that just is another store clerk. Like
and he is in the, d,
where is he? To to lead US terror
prevention.
To me, that I mean, I'm jumping ahead
a bit, but to me, these kind of
people being put there either means one of
two things, that they're destroying this for the
influence and or access of a foreign power
or that they're just that incompetent and don't
understand how bad that is, that these people
don't know what they're doing in positions they're
supposed to be keeping us safe from outside
actors or terrorism, which I think the reality
is is what you know I think already.
We'll come back to this.
So point is, with all of that being
said, you have this installed that opens the
door to even more.
Now keep this in mind, by the way,
with all the other stuff we're talking about,
with the artificial intelligence, with the survey the
basically using all this data to train your
AI models, the the lack of security for
that, the the hack already happening. Like, all
of this is the same conversation.
You really just think this is just bumbling
incompetence? I I find that really hard to
believe. It says, quote, Starlink doesn't require anything.
It allows you to transmit data without any
kind of record or tracking.
Yeah. Sure seems to add up.
This says this is the White House IT
systems had very strong controls on network access.
You had to be on full,
tunnel VPN at all times before Starlink.
If you were not on the VPN, White
House issued devices can't connect to the outside.
Now this is with Starlink connection.
That means White House devices could leave the
network and go out through gateways.
It's going to help you bypass security,
says one of the experts.
Well, who could that possibly benefit? I mean,
it literally could just be for Teal and
and Palantir or Tekton or Elon himself.
I mean, you don't know. But the truth
is there's a very clear culprit out there
that's been tapped into this administration from day
one. And you know my concerns there. I'm
not trying to make sure you think the
same way I do. I just want you
to be concerned about this and recognize with
all that's going on, the Johnson cat turd,
you know,
Rakowski kind of certain aspect of all this
aren't talking about this kind of stuff, aren't
concerned about that. They're focused on the partisan
wedge issues because it's profitable, I think. This
is before most a part of the government.
He blew up his relationship with Trump. He
was busy laying siege to sensitive government databases,
including the ones that handle Social Security,
sparking concerns from critics. I mean, it's a
really crazy crazy thing to think about. Right?
Is now they're breaking up, apparently, and we'll
go into that a little bit more next.
What does that mean for all of this?
I mean, if if he was being given
this
no leash to
run through personal information and have no oversight,
breaking things down, closing and now all of
a sudden, he just pull now what?
Is that is Annie Gleason we're told? Is
she gonna take over? I find it hard
to believe. If you remember, that's the so
called director of Goge, which nobody has seen.
It just I'm I'm not even sure what
that is.
So, ultimately,
it's a very concerning thing for even people
on the inside that suddenly they're break if
unless that is the theater.
But it says in April,
a whistleblower at the National Labor Relations Board
accused the Musk led department of a significant
cyber security breach. We talked about it then.
They got very little coverage, but was it
a breach, or was that what we're talking
about?
Now especially since it already happened, shouldn't that
matter? Shouldn't why would they leave the same
thing in place?
Same question. Same point, rather. And it says,
and saw
this is important.
An IT staffer said he saw
anomalously
large data transfers
and sign in attempts from Russia after Doge
took over his agency systems. Now that doesn't
have to mean it's Russia, by the way.
Very it's not that difficult today. Like, Vault
seven showed you a lot of how those
things can work, right, leaving a false digital
footprint, WikiLeaks and all that. My point is
it could be maybe it is Russia. I
don't know. My point is that, anyway, it
should matter that you have an outside entity
transferring massive amounts of data from the White
House? How is this not a bigger point?
In that case, the Doge staffers insisted that
their actions in the system could not be
tracked.
So, again or I should add that this
is all false. Right? It's certainly possible this
is all being made up to
undermine Trump's successful campaign or, you know, whatever
the you know, I don't I don't think
that's true, but consider that as a possibility.
But it says the staffers insisted with all
of that that their actions not be tracked.
Why?
How is that even possible that you could
have this unprecedented
lacking of oversight, young 20 that many of
them are you know, we've gone over the
past of very concerning overlaps. I'm not even
talking about politics. Who have access to your
personal data that we know we've seen them
use to their own benefit in the past
from Tesla, from Starlink,
and
and while they do that, not being tracked.
I find that wild.
Now moving on,
before we come back to the, Washington Post
article,
I wanna show you a couple things that
overlap with what I very strongly think is
an Israel connection to all of this. Just
I just really just using it as an
excuse to include a few things that I
don't want you to miss in regard to
Israel. But you know my opinion, guys. I
think it's if you're like, if
even Occam's razor, like, all things considered equal,
the most obvious possibility here is that Israel,
through all of the 100,000 connections and open
influence they have, are conducting some kind of
a coup or overthrowing or, you know, just
destroying this country for the bringing on the
end times as they claim is necessary
to destroy the West, to bring on their
end times and the coming. It's that's a
leader leadership members of their of their current
government. And, by the way, I shouldn't discount
their or ignore the, what, the ascent and,
was it Waltz and a couple of others
that are Christian, like, biblical Zionists who share
the same idea.
And yet somehow America
but are of that mind. I mean, you
wanna walk me through how that makes sense.
Now I wanna show you a couple examples
of how clear it is that influence is
there. As Patrick Henningsen
points out, imagine The US secretary of state
literally works for a foreign government, and now
he's sanctioning a court for doing its job,
investigating real war crimes. Marco Rubio,
the ICC
the ICC's baseless and politicized targeting of American
America and our close ally Israel must end.
Today, I have sanctioned our four ICC judges.
Sorry. Just I'm I'm gonna go ahead and
tell you there,
I often get
migraines, and I'm hoping that's not what's happening
now. And I get the if you guys
know you get them out there, I get
these little my eyes, I get, like, white
spots, and it's happening right now, unfortunately. I'm
trying to struggle through it, but it's giving
it's making me hard it's making it hard
to read this right now, so just bear
with me. I'm hoping that drifts in the
background.
Usually, it's a sign that I'm about to
have a migraine. I hope that doesn't happen.
But, where was I? So my eyes are
making it hard.
I have sang it says, today, I have
sanctioned four ICC judges
for infringing on US and Israeli sovereignty,
which don't forget, this goes back multiple left
and right administrations,
but from Pompeo, Bolton, and, you know, and
and left and right. I'm trying to remember
who the other ones were, where they made
it very clear. If you do this, we
will go after you, even to the point
of threatening their families.
And so Israel being the reason, you damn
well know. And so now the point is
they're saying that you're threatening our sovereignty. In
what way are they in any way threatening
your sovereignty? They're just using lazy arguments. They
know the people who don't understand sovereignty or
constitutional rights will freak out and say, we
this is what we wanna do, and they're
stopping us. Therefore, they're bringing our sovereignty.
Well, no. That's not how sovereignty works. The
bottom line is that what they're doing is
a crime, and the ICC has acknowledged that
crime. And so that means that anybody a
part of it, which is also The United
States, is supposed to be acting to resolve
that. They're not. They're acting like they're somehow
weaponized against Israel when the whole damn world
can see it. And we know what Marco
Rubio's tapped into. We know the APAC money
and everything else that flows through this complete
manipulator.
So understand that he is going after a
international court who's calling out what the whole
world can see.
Everybody, left and right. Guys, it's obvious what's
happening.
And he says,
we call on our allies to stand with
us against this disgraceful attack.
Just think about that with all that's going
on, and this is what he focused on.
Now here's ambassador Tom,
Barak Barak says, Israeli prime minister Netanyahu and
I met in Jerusalem today to discuss Syria
and the broader region. Can you or broader,
excuse me, a broader. Can you can you
think about I mean, think about how insane
it is that everyone
with even the most the tiniest amount of
pay of discernment or just attention span
already knows that they were telling you left
and right that these people were terrorists because
they are, by the way, Hayat al Sham,
Al Qaeda, ISIS connections.
That's who they were. They had a $10,000,000
bounty on his head.
Israel
and The United States and many other actors,
I'm sure,
took took advantage of a moment, which I
think was completely orchestrated to get Assad out
of the way. Israel literally moves in, takes
territory, builds bases, starts executing people. And the
ISIS elements that at that moment were still
on a $10,000,000 bounty, rather specifically, Jalani,
they started committing ethnic cleansing,
murdering all the whites, Christians, and everybody alike.
And somehow they just go, oh, okay. Well,
he's good now. He's in a suit. We'll
take him off the list. That's where we
are. It's I mean, there were ISIS I
mean, I can show you that right now,
in fact.
Cass, it's not getting better. This is driving
me crazy.
As Israel further occupies Syria, western backed ISIS
patch wearing terrorists began executions.
These pictures were re you could look up
the reserve reverse image. That's a real picture
that was taken in Syria right after they
took over. That's their people. Here's another one,
ISIS patches murdering people on the ground.
The point
is clearly
going to meet them to talk about Syria
seems kind of insane knowing that why is
Israel even involved? What is the Golan Heights
is illegally occupied territory according to everybody other
than The United States. It just seems so
crazy that we pretend like that's not obvious.
And it says,
Trump envisions a Syria that cannot be used
as a platform by party nation state. You
mean, like, Israel? Which is, like, literally how
they're using Golan Heights to bomb back down
into Gaza or, excuse me, into Syria. Exactly.
Or non nation state to threaten Syria's neighbors,
including Israel. Oh, okay.
I mean, what about Syria being threatened and
occupied and destroyed? It's just so wild. How
dishonest and blatantly manipulative.
He says, thanks, Tom, for confirming that Israel
was behind the entire fifteen year Syria destabilization
project, including unleashing Al Qaeda and ISIS against
the people of the Levant.
Under under under wing of US
and UK, Turkey, Jordan, and Qatar, all allied
with Israel to destroy Syria, turning it into
the largest haven for takfiri terrorists on the
planet today with a former deputy ISIS head
chopper on the throne in Damascus, gleefully endorsed
by Donald Trump.
Wild.
The most provable thing in this conversation today.
On top of that,
here, this will probably blow your mind. I
mean oh, I mean, probably not if you
watch this show.
The New York City mayoral Democratic primary debate.
Why in the world
a New York City mayor
would even have to discuss Israel is beyond
me. But the fact that I mean, you
if you're gonna make it about the conversation
of antisemitism,
which is also manufactured and completely illusory, which
even the ADL has been caught for by
Jewish organizations,
the point
is that that has nothing to do with
whether you'd be traveling to Israel unless you're
still pretending that that's the state of the
Jews, which is their whole argument, which I'll
include I think I included here. I'll grab
it for you as we go forward. Dan
Cohen, a Jewish person himself, makes an excellent
argument about how we know that's not true.
But let's play this clip, and this will
probably blow your mind even if you watch
the show. Cuomo? Given the hostility and the
antisemitism
that has been,
shown in New York, I would go to
Israel.
Mister Tilson, where would you go? Yeah. I'd
make my trip to Israel followed by my
trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies,
fighting on the front lines of the global
war on terror. Mister Mamdani?
I would stay in New York City. My
plans are to address New Yorkers across the
five boroughs and focus on that. Mister Mamdani,
can I just jump in? Would you visit
Israel?
I As mayor? I will be doing as
the mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish
New Yorkers, and I'll be meeting them wherever
they are across the five boroughs, whether that's
in their synagogues and temples or at their
homes or at the subway platform. Because ultimately,
we need to focus on delivering on their
concerns. And just yes or no, do you
believe in a Jewish state of Israel? I
believe Israel has the right to exist.
Not As a Jewish state? No. As a
state with equal rights.
He won't. He will not say it has
a right to exist as a Jewish state
be very And his answer was no. He
won't visit Israel. I I said that That's
what he was trying to say. No. No.
No. Unlike you, I answered unlike you, I
answered very directly. Alright. I wanna be very
clear. I believe every state should be a
state of equal rights. Okay. Thank you, miss
Montgomery.
That is an insane.
I mean, the idea that that's even, like,
why it's that the only thing an irrational
person can take from that is that this
is a an an entity,
Zionism, that has so egregiously
influenced, overtaken, and compromised
so many facets of the society that that
is what the you can't your answer, that's
as stupid as saying you're when you say
all lives matter that you're somehow racist. That
is the same kind of manipulation.
Probably comes from the same point. I just
think that's wildly insane, and most people in
this country feel the same way. But these
these manipulated
these politicians will stand up there and say
whatever the people that they know actually get
them elected, whatever they wanna hear. That's what's
actually happening. If you can't see by now
that most Americans think that's wild and yet
they still say it, what does that show
you? I shouldn't say it like that. That
seeing that, what does that show you?
It shows you that somebody else is in
control.
That's just absolutely disgusting to me. It is
so very clear.
And I'll I'll play this clip. I I
mean, I wanna try I I wasn't planning
on it, but I wanna play I wanna
find really quickly,
the clip the the tweet I was gonna
share from Dan Cohen, and then we'll keep
going.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what I would like Israel to be.
I'd like a democratic solution, one state with
equal rights for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization, Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel,
and the conclusion was it is an apartheid
state.
And there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar reports,
which the same conclusion,
Israel is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says That's right. The
Jews
have a unique
unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination. Mhmm. It
means even if Arabs became
a majority Mhmm. They would still have no
right to self determination.
So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology,
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
Now it's Avi Shlaim, a highly respected Israeli
British academic,
Jewish person himself speaking with Human Rights Watch.
You know, 02/2021,
they established it as an apartheid state, but
seldom Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, all the
rest. It's very, very clear. And he's just
making sure you understand
that he that he believes that it is
the most racist ideology on the planet. That's
what that apartheid through Zionism today.
Now this was I think I don't know
if it's the same one. Same point, though.
Alvin Trai says, let me solve a big
mystery for you, a truly gigantic one. The
Italian state represents the Italian people. The Chinese
people state represents the Chinese people. The point
is the Jewish state represents the Jewish people.
Now the the bottom line is he says
here and then what he's saying there what
what Dan is saying is the point. The
Israeli state represents the Israeli people.
Just because it claims to be the state
of all Jews doesn't make it true. And
in fact, it's usually the opposite. Israel says
it has most moral army in the world,
for example. And the the I don't believe
what's funny is I'll just grab this really
quickly. I don't believe Alan is
I feel like he has a lot of
nuance with the way he discusses this. I
can look through it, maybe believe that he's,
you know, wrong in the sense that I
would see it in regard to that point.
What Dan is pointing out
as I think, I'll include this with us
as well.
One of our most recent interviews. It is
is the simple, provable fact, guys, that just
like a lot of major Jewish organizations are
pointing out today, that Israel represents Zionism, the
Israeli people. It's not the Jewish state. And
there's plenty of Jewish organizations that will tell
you that, and they will speak out and
make sure you hear that they are being
manipulated by the Jewish the the Israeli state
pretending to be representing all the Jews.
The bottom the bottom line, guys, is all
of this is used to drive us into
a place where we hide from the obvious,
which is that this is happening today. And
just one last point in case you missed
it, this is the group that they're all
funding and supporting.
Forensic architecture has now documented a pattern of
Israeli attacks on areas into which they have
previously instructed civilians to go to evacuate. This
happens every single time. Our Our research confirms
that the Israeli military carried out multiple attacks
in areas towards the civilians that have been
directed
either on the same day as the evacuation
order or the or the, the day after.
And if they follow-up and say and this
is Yannis saying incontrovertible
evidence is now in. Israel instructs Palestinian civilians
to to go to particular spots where it
bombs them. Israel has chosen war criminality, and
it pursues it relentlessly.
Your governments out there support this.
There's just no there is no getting beyond
that.
Now on Syria, like we pointed out, I
think it's just a vivid image to see.
As Dan Daniel McAdams says, guess which one
The US foreign policy elite supports?
It says Syria before and after.
So here's Assad, and that is with the
way he looked dressed all the time. The
the the had the largest Christian population of
all the Middle East before what they did
there.
Here's the leader they all support now. That's
a recent pick. That is that is the
guy we're discussing. That is Jelani
leading Syria as the so called president. That's
his wife.
You know, where where are all the Republicans
now? Right? Where where are the Laura Loomers
and the rest out there that are you
know, you're supporting the people that are making
that happen, and they probably know that somewhere
inside. Don't
care. But back to the point,
White House security staff warned Musk, Starlink is
a security risk. Couple more points to add
to it. The people said
who's managing the systems weren't the people said
those managing the systems weren't able to monitor
such connections to stop sensitive information from leaving
the complex or hackers from breaking in. Great
thing to do to the White House. Seems
kind of like a bad move unless your
plan was to let people get in
or take information.
If not,
it not it could excuse me. I'm still
having trouble seeing this stuff. It could
not be verified whether the rooftop terminal remains
installed or if anything would change now that
Musk has receded from the government. A Starlink
guest Wi Fi network appeared on the White
House phones in February,
prompting users only for a password, not a
username or even a form of authentication,
according to the people
that that that were visit that saw there
and were there and witnessed it on February.
That Wi Fi network was still appearing on
White House visitors' phones this week according to
the report. The White House referred questions to
the US Secret Service, which said it could
not discuss specific technology systems for security reasons.
Okay.
Which is probably true, but it's funny you're
you're not talking about the security risk for
security reasons. It says it could have the
potential to undermine our national security
by exposing sensitive data and information to hackers,
our adversaries,
or those wishing to do Americans
harm. Certainly.
The Starlink roof installation initially reported by The
New York Times triggered a confrontation between DOGE
employees and Secret Service,
at the time anyway.
The opposition by White House staff has not
been previously reported.
Right? So they all they all got lockstep
now. Right? People got left. They got fired.
People pushed aside, and everyone there is we're
going with whatever Trump says we're supposed to
think.
Starlink is allegedly being used at other government
agencies as well. A whistleblower from the National
Labor Relations Board said that Starlink was installed
there. A former senior employer at the General
Services Administration told The Post that Doge employees
used it on-site at least through the last
month.
Starlink satellite connections are harder to hack than
conventional US telecommunication networks,
which were
thoroughly penetrated by China in a campaign revealed
last year. Now certainly don't have to hack
them if you're being given access, though. But
end to end encryption phone communications such as
those over the Signal app are not readable
by hackers unless the devices themselves are hacked.
Right? Or they are backed up by other
software that gets hacked as we recently were
found with the case of TeleMessage, which again,
of course, they downplay the obvious point in
this, which is that is an Israeli content
a company. It's very easy to look up.
Here's our show on it. State department revealed
to be using Israeli intelligence link chat app
involved in the Trump admin hack.
That's Walt's right there being caught with that
picture
using TeleMessage.
It's a it's and it's a Israeli unit
8,200 company
that Israeli government and intelligence have access to.
And you've got Walt and other blind Zionist
supporters who are using that internal at the
highest levels of top secret information.
I just think that is so cartoonishly
crazy and no one seems to care.
But the point, all these different locations in
our government that seem to be vulnerable to
this. It is unclear why DOGE was so
insistent on Starlink, accept the obvious. But at
other agencies, DOGE staffers have demanded deep access
to data and just disabled logging that tracked
what they did with it.
Doge employees have also been reported are using
artificial intelligence programs to plow through massive amounts
of government data. Right? Does it all just
leave you feeling warm and fuzzy?
Everything's on track. I mean, this is like
a
personification of that meme. This is fine. Everything's
good. Right? Just just sit back and ignore
it. Trust the plan.
Let's not forget,
Trump's last administration,
the Israel got caught using Stingray devices at
the White House.
This is there's many records about this, and
it's not the time, but nobody seemed to
care of that either. Right?
Here's this report on it from four zero
four media if you wanna check it out.
It is an Israeli company, and it's wild
that they got so little attention. And, of
course, I'll reiterate the point about Trump's missing
ethics pledges from his entire from many people
in his cabinet.
And I still think every day that gets
more relevant.
I'm sure at some I mean, if if
it ends up passing, it'll be some breaking
story from somebody who acts like like Loomer
will break it down and somehow carve out
Israel from the story just like she did
with the Azov movement. And it's a bombshell,
and it's, you know, how that tends to
work when it's no longer important.
But it's it's there. It's all that matters.
Now I'll include these as well. I just
think this is just with everything we just
discussed, Trump appoints a 22 year old ex
gardener and grocery store assistant to lead US
terror prevention.
You know, kind of exactly what you would
do if you're trying to,
I don't know,
not have prevention. If you wanna look at
that, not you know, I I I just
think that's absolutely insane. Now, apparently, the guy
was just a hardcore Trump supporter and was
campaigning with them. And he and he, you
know, I guess that's called I guess,
it's not really nepotism when it's not in
your family, but it's the same idea. Right?
You're just you people that support you,
you that's what you lean into. I mean,
blindly, and that's what we get. People the
guy that in this position, you think that
guy's gonna go against what Trump wants even
if he knows it's wrong? Come on. I'd
like to believe so, but I find it
hard to believe.
Alleged spy was 22
alleged spy was also 22 year old ex
grocery store clerk hired by Trump.
Is that, like, some kind of thing? How
weird is that? And this is the guy
that's leaked information supposedly to Germany.
You see on point, guys? It's hard to
miss all this stuff.
Now let's talk about the overlap of Elon
Musk and the breakup of Trump if that's
really what's happening and and what that means
with what we just saw. I mean, if
that's what's going on, which seems pretty obvious,
what's the implication with these two are breaking
up all of a sudden?
Raw alerts, president Donald Trump is now reportedly
considering getting rid
or giving away big important news here, guys,
of his Tesla.
Right? Like the least important story of today,
but it's just I just want you to
see briefly that it's continuing. And I think
it's pretty obvious it doesn't seem that it's
gonna be repaired unless all this is theater,
which really should be considered. On the South
Lawn a few months ago to try to
help Elon Musk's business while it was being
vandalized.
We are told that that Tesla still sitting
there, the red Tesla with Florida tags, is
either going to be given away or sold
off.
And we are I mean, isn't that just
the most childish thing in the world? So,
I mean, this the whole thing throughout the
whole show today, mostly on Garcia, but the
whole thing.
It just you need to stand back and
recognize what how embarrassing this is. You know,
for people like us, the nonpartisan objective people
out there, the IMA, we're over here talking
about,
you know, in the beginning. Like, oh, they're
being dishonest. Oh, they're just being partisan. They're
just saying whatever they need to say to
get the job done. And you get the
Johnsons and cat turned up the road. You
know, you're you're just a democrat. You don't
like it. And then this stuff happens. And
then it literally proves exactly what we were
saying. Oh, so he didn't really care. Or
he did, but now it doesn't matter because
he hates Musk. So you're either proving to
us that you're a petty, small person who
will react in a childish way because you
got spurned. That's not a good trait for
a president, or you were lying to us
in the place about whether this was something
you should support because that's the same reason
in reverse. It's because it's your team and
that's what matter. None of that shows you
the indication of somebody who is honest and
trustworthy, who's doing what's right for American people
no matter what.
And if you think for one second, I
don't think the same thing about Biden, you're
not paying attention. The point is to recognize
right now how what you're seeing in all
this shows you that these are fly by
the seat of the pants. They'll say whatever
they need to say to get the job
done that they want at the moment,
especially or I shouldn't say it like that,
but just usually at the expense of Americans.
Are told that it was about a month
that Elon Musk was wearing thin on Trump.
So this was not a sudden exit and
then blow up. There was about a month,
that he was wearing thin. The And then
when we were saying that a month ago,
what were people saying?
Right? It's just it's you know, the the
the same old group of, you know, dancing
clowns out there that they all were you
know, it's all the best thing in the
world, even right when it started happening. Remember
when Trump gave him that key, tried to
act like, no. We're just parting ways, and
we're still best friends. We all knew what
was going on. It was obvious you were
starting to see it break down. Again, and
it all could be theater. My point is
I still think even if it is that
they really don't like each other, so it
wasn't hard to fake. And So I just
think it's interesting to see all these people
that are now trying to keep the wagon
going, who were over there before trying to
lie as best they could to make you
pretend that, you know, it's all just Democrat.
They're doing great. As Kat Dortz said, they'll
never drive away between them. They're so stupid.
And now here they are. Now he's going,
Elon is the worst person alive.
It's just how do you not see the
dishonesty and all that? President's word. Something else.
There was some reporting today about the possibility
of a Trump and Elon Musk phone call
to make nice.
Aids are telling me that is not something
they are tracking. It's possible that some staffers
might try to talk to Musk, but no
Trump and Musk call, at least not that
we know about. We did Just just wanna
remind you real quick. This is breaking news
on Fox. This is the important stuff. Right?
Hear from the president yesterday,
and he didn't sound mad, but he sounded
disappointed.
Elon
and I had a great relationship.
I don't know if we will anymore, but
I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped
Elon a lot. And I'll be honest, I
think he misses the place.
I think he got out there and all
of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful
Oval Office.
The lowest blows yesterday came from Elon. He
said without me, Trump would have lost the
election. Dems would control the house and the
Republicans would be fit
You know, you can't say, oh, it's great.
Everything's good. And then come around and say,
he's always this or he's always been that.
It just shows you that they don't even
care that they just said something that makes
that look wrong or that you're saying it
now, and that's a lie. These people will
say whatever to hide to to
to insulate their fragile egos, which is what
it seems to me.
Now here is Fox News. Trump warns of
serious consequences.
This is today or yesterday. If Musk funds
Democrats,
now this just makes the point better than
anything.
So is he now not allowed to do
what he wants with his own money because
how dare you not do what Trump wants?
What do you mean there'd be consequences if
he funds Democrats? I mean, you have you
have to realize how petty and small this
is, how vindictive this is, and that's what
they are
every day with what they were doing on
Twitter, with censoring their own people when they
said what he didn't like or any context
you wanna put it in. That's who these
people are, both of them. I just think
that's really insane to say out loud, but
that Trump doesn't seem to care. Trump Donald
Trump warned on Saturday that there would be
serious consequences of Elon Musk for him if
he were to fund Democrats.
I just that stands for itself. You're gonna
know the president's going to attack him for
doing what he wants with his own money.
Even if it's vindictive, he has every right
to do what he wants with his money.
The president also told the outlet that he
has no interest in repairing his relationship with
with,
Elon. When asked if he thought his relationship
with Musk was over, Trump reportedly told NBC
News, I would assume so. Yeah.
Interesting.
Now this from independent House Doge caucus leader
says everybody
knew Elon Musk was exaggerating his cost cutting
achievements.
Yeah. Everybody honest anyway.
And in the same point, all the Johnsons
and cock turds and all the rest out
there, all the Alex Jones who were just
blindly taking face value, whatever Elon wrote out
on Twitter that day. And you damn well
know it, guys. Just be honest with yourselves.
I didn't know for sure it was wrong,
at least for some of them. Some of
them I did investigate myself and proved in
real time, even before that New York Times
article that he was lying about these things.
And I'll show you a quick example in
a
The point though,
if you, and this is the GOP by
the way, that are saying this, of course,
they're the rhinos if they say the wrong
thing. But the bottom line is that clearly
it was obvious they were lying, that they
got caught with gauze of condoms, they got
caught with
many big lies.
And they were like, oh, well, we're not
gonna be right all the time. It wasn't
that you were wrong, you were lying.
And it's very clear. And so now it
comes out that we just they were always
being dishonest even from their own side. And
now it's gonna be some kinda split down
the middle, but the point is the evidence
is what you should care about, not because
some politician says so. But it says Elon
Musk was exaggerating achievements of the of Doge,
and most everybody on Capitol Hill knew it,
says the GOP lawmaker.
Most and this is, Republican US representative Blake
Moore.
Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating what he
could do.
This but but that's not unique to if
if he's really bombastic about it, but that's
what politicians do, guys. And it says he
was claiming that he that to find 4,000,000,000
a day in cuts he was going to
get. One time, he said 2,000,000,000,000 he was
going to find.
And then it rolled that he ended with
a 170,000,000,000,
and that was that's a lie, guys. That
number is not accurate. I was proving that
right in the beginning. It's a massive exaggeration,
and I think people are recognizing that now,
he says.
Moore is one of the one of three
co leaders, I found this really interesting, of
the House Doge caucus,
a bipartisan group of lawmakers
who had hoped to support his cost cutting
efforts.
So
arguably on the side of him wanting to
help do what the what Doge is supposed
to do. But, see, with all the weird
moving parts, they clearly aren't about cutting costs.
But whatever else they were doing back there,
they didn't want people involved, which is why
they
hid what they were doing, why they didn't
involve the caucus, why they didn't it seems
even Trump wasn't even aware.
But it says according to Business Insider, the
group had intended to compile a report of
potential cost saving measures for Doge at the
end of the first quarter,
Reportedly received little contact from the department.
Quote, we've always been a little frustrated that
there was such limited interaction.
Does it seem odd? Wouldn't you be, like,
required interaction
with the DOGE caucus and what DOGE is
doing? Well, no. Not if it's not what
it looks
like. This is we couldn't really identify
where we were to lean in. And we
had a ton of folks ready to support
it, but there just wasn't that interaction.
So if their job was to actually cut
cost, if they would have leaned in with
a lot of congressional support that wanted the
same thing, you probably would have actually seen
reductions.
But that's not what I think this is
about.
I think you know that.
So
giving you a couple of interesting points. And
this is just two points that were easy
to make because of how obvious it is
they're being caught lying. But please do your
own due diligence. Recognize how many of these
claims. You can literally go down that so
called wall of savings and just enter in
the numbers in The USA savings,
you know, in this this website right here,
which all include this one, USA spending. Excuse
me.
And just look at for yourself. Some of
them are real, but it's not hard. Go
through for five minutes. You'll find one that
is at least an exaggeration or a number
they claim they saved when, ultimately, what you
know, there's there's a nuance there. Right? You
you stop potential spending, but you didn't say.
There's a lot of different ways, but some
of them were just flat out lies.
And, yes, guys, it's I'm not left or
right. I just care about what the facts
are, and that's what the facts showed.
This report from the independent Trump team set
to destroy
$12,000,000
worth of HIV drugs and contraceptives
that were bought before closing USAID.
Well, guys, USAID did not close. I'm so
tired of and this is the point about
the false two party paradigm. If the end
of if the corporate media, as we're told,
are supposed to be hell bent on destroying
Donald Trump in the why do they lie
for him? Why do they lie very deliberately
here
and on this story
about the bird flu? I'll show you both
of them. They're lying. I mean or or,
like,
I think it's lying. It's just as possible
that they're just that incompetent, and the the
person putting them to it gave them a
direction. They're the ones who are lying for,
you know, a lot of these ask Allison
Morrow. A lot of these mainstream journalists just
do what they're told. Ask Tucker Carlson, he
knows well. The point
is that this is a dishonest point that
they didn't the USAID
is very much still operating. And at Rubio
stated that publicly recently,
it got absorbed by the State Department, which
essentially is the same difference. They were already
out of the State Department. And at the
end of the day,
it's still going just for what they want
to go at. And my point was,
you got this big point about Reuters. Right?
And they're always it's a Democrat funding through
Reuters. Well, guess what? They're doing the same
thing. Reuters Newswire services, as of this administration,
are still being funded. I pointed it out
in a recent show more than once.
Same point here. Or rather in a general
sense that you can see that they're still
funding a lot of the things they claim
they stopped. One of the ones I pointed
out was HIV contraception,
circumcision in South Africa.
They made this big point about how stupid
that was and then funded it again.
Of course, that's not what the Republicans see
or care about because that's not the fun
narrative that makes it look like wacky woke
Democrats, which does exist. But the point is
these are all
fronts to achieve their ends when it really
comes down to the outcome.
Team Trump is set to destroy 12,000,000 of
HIV drugs. Okay. It says these drugs have
been sitting in distribution centers in Belgium for
and The UAE since January when Trump ended
the agency spending. This is a lie, guys.
They didn't end the spending. It is very
much on the record. You can look it
up in USA spending. It says the mandate
that the USAID negotiator has been given is
get us money for it, and you can't
do and if you can't do that, they're
gonna go in the trash. I doubt that.
It says these supplies include more than 26,000,000
condoms, 2,000,000 doses of injectable birth control. You
get where it's going. The point of the
article, which is adding to their narrative, is
that we did this because that woke stuff
was we're we're done with that. Okay. So
if they are still spending 15,000,000
plus for this exact thing, why would they
be making this claim?
Well, let's let's look at it. When contacted
for comment,
the senior department and the state department told
The Independent that The Post was once again
delivered fake news, and the story is full
of inaccuracies. Well, that's actually true.
Here
is the clip I'll include, but I'll I'll
I'll I'll show you the actual document. I
put this out
03/26/2025.
Everyone rightly calling out the absurd USAID spending
by Biden
should also be calling out the Trump administration
currently funding male circumcision in Africa for HIV
prevention or funding for climate change study or
prevention, etcetera, etcetera. All of those are linked
in there. You can see right there, we're
going through, what, fifteen, twenty different points,
and it's including climate change, which I bet
you can get that to come up, actually.
Nope.
I could skim through here if you if
I feel like I wanna take the time.
You can see in here you can see
all the documents in here as you go
through it.
Right there. See?
If you keep going, I bet you I
could find it. Like, see right there, that
one, which we're not gonna look at today,
there's many of these.
There's many of these circumcision points. This one,
as you can see, that's in Tanzania.
And we're gonna show you one right now
for South Africa. That's currently funded by the
Trump administration. Just to keep the point connected,
here's that document
from usaspending.gov.
This is, just to quickly show you the
main point.
That is
March 5.
K. That is that's the Trump administration.
$15,000,000
$15,600,000
very clearly for provision of voluntary medical mayor
circumcision for HIV prevention in The Republic Of
South Africa.
So I just I find it really hard
to believe that you're talking about, you know,
$12,000,000
worth of wasted
you're spending $15,000,000
to send stuff to so this seems like
a ploy. This seems like a coordinated manipulation,
if you want my opinion.
But if you go through this,
you'll find a bunch of examples.
South Africa, that's probably the same one.
HIV prevention,
voluntary male medical circum circumcision, gender based violence
prevention and response. That's all that's multiple contracts
they were funding in the same place
or in, you know, in the same category.
That's HHS. That's RFK's HHS still funding these
things.
Let me see if this I I just
wanna I was hoping to just catch one
real quick and you can see the climate
change one.
There's one strengthening epidemiology and strategic information in
The Republic Of Zimbabwe under president's emergency plan
for AIDS relief. Same point. That's almost $2,500,000.
All the documents are in here. The link
to the show is right there.
Well, so that one is that one is
just about sustainable health sector
response, HIV overlap.
Another HIV at testing service overlap in Malawi.
No. I'm not saying good, bad, or any
or other. I'm just pointing out that everyone's
up in arms about this and stopping the
the dumb Democrats from doing it when then
Trump's administration is currently spending it. Don't you
just find that dishonest at the very least,
manipulative that you would knowingly do that and
then lie to everybody about it?
This one's about funding a bird flu,
COVID nineteen overlap shot. We talked about that.
I'll give up on it in one second.
I feel like it's gonna be right here.
Maybe not.
Oh, well.
The only reason I even do
only reason I do I'm even doing it
is because I know that people out there
who don't want to believe it will ignore
it.
There it is. Okay. Perfect.
The cooperative the Cooperative Institute will employ world
class researchers to conduct science and serve a
society in partnership with n the o
NOAA.
It says in the Cooperative Institute will be
supported
by a robust infrastructure committed to equity, education,
and outreach, climate science, and prediction.
Not good, bad, whatever you can decide for
yourself. The current administration is funding climate science,
is funding HIV prevention, all the stuff you
thought you were fighting. So ask yourself why
the Washington Post is pretending, or maybe they
are wasting it, but acting like that means
they're not doing it in USAID shutdown. That
seems
like bad journalism or a coordinated misdirection.
Is this the same one? Why don't I
have two of those?
Yeah. Looks like it. So here
is the South Africa one. You can read
more for yourself. Next one is about bird
flu.
Trump administration cancels contract for bird flu vaccine.
Well, you know about that. That's the Moderna
contract
that they did cancel, at least as we
can tell.
So the article says on May 28, The
US the HHS
canceled the Moderna contract.
The funding was worded to a company in
January intended to be used developing a vaccine
for bird flu. And and it says
as cases surge and virus mutates, they canceled,
they're claiming.
With Donald Trump and his administration taking over,
the DHS decided to cancel the contract. Earlier
in the year, the DHS announced that it
was reassessing the contract.
HHS secretary, RFK Jr, had consistently questioned the
safety of mRNA technology.
Yeah. He did, and now he's promoting it,
is now rolling out more shots. So it's
very dishonest to frame it like this, which
Moderna implemented. Health HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon stated
that the department had decided that investing in
Moderna and its mRNA technology was not in
the best interest of the department considering the
science and ethics behind the technology.
What a ridiculously dishonest statement as you're currently
leaning into multiple mRNA shots. If you think
the technology is a problem, then why the
hell are you rolling out other mRNA shots?
Kennedy has suggested an alternative approach to contacting
to contain the virus. Are you serious? Are
we really gonna pretend
that this platform is not capable of researching
the other shot they're supporting?
Or is this another coordinated misdirection to get
people supporting Trump to think that that's what's
happening?
Well, let's look.
You know.
Hey. Here's one of them. This was I
covered this 04/14/2025,
well before most were talking about it. FDA's
bird flu self amplifying mRNA jab.
Watch the show for yourself. Here's the document.
Arcturus
fast track. FDA fast track. And this is
a self amplifying mRNA shot for bird flu.
How in the world are you gonna pretend
like we're worried about technology, so we we
canceled that Biden tech Biden contract
as you do that?
That's just dishonesty, guys.
Or this one.
Trump administration approves poultry jab for avian flu
for birds, like this forgiving chickens the bird
flu shot. That was on 02/16/2025.
Here's the actual breakdown. US conditionally approves vaccine
to protect poultry for avian flu.
What about this one? RFK Jr's universal flu
vaccine platform. That's 05/04/2025.
Here's the document.
HHS and NIH launched next generation universal flu
platform.
Sure sounds like mRNA to me.
And just in case you don't believe any
of that, here's Grok for you. Here's the
summary of what they're what they're supporting while
pretending like they don't support technology.
The shot that we discussed,
self amplifying, or rather that's the bird flu
one for the birds. This one is the
$500,000,000
project to develop the universal flu vaccine, not
the same as the 500 mil,
was it
why am I forgetting that all of a
sudden?
We'll go back to it. The the Stargate
program and how much money they invested in
that program,
and then you've got the self amplifying shot.
And let's not forget, by the way,
in Biden's administration
showing you the continual as I tell I
tell you the the linear progression of the
same things, not the flashy wedge issues they
want you distracted by, but the real agenda.
Bird flu emergency declared by Biden's administration,
07/28/2024.
If you don't if you forgot that, remember,
this wasn't just about bird flu. They declared
the so called emergency
and then basically broadened it out to seasonal
flu under the guise of fighting bird flu.
So now under this conversation, whether you know
it or not, your current flu shot is
under emergency declaration
or which opens the e way and all
sorts of frivolous things. So Trump and RFK
Jr are continuing the charge, you know, while
the Washington Post and the rest pretend like
they're not. Wanna make sense of that for
me?
So keeping that dishonesty in mind, let's talk
about the overlap of the health conversation in
this, which overlaps with Palantir, overlaps with all
of it. Nicholas
Holscher
says, flashback, day two of the Trump administration.
Day two, if you can imagine that,
announces the Stargate project.
You could make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine.
You can make that robotically using AI in
about forty eight hours.
Yeah. Brooke Jackson is screaming about why we
should stop this and why we need to
recall anything that uses AI produced data and
how the companies like Pfizer, Moderna are manipulating
us through a lot of this, but here
we are.
Oracle is a huge part of this too.
So we
gene sequence once we gene sequence that cancer
tumor,
you can then vaccinate the person,
design a vaccine for every individual person to
vaccinate them against that cancer.
And you can make that vaccine, the that
mRNA vaccine,
you can make that
robotically, again, using AI in about forty eight
hours. So imagine early cancer detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you, and
have have that vaccine available in forty eight
hours. This is the promise of AI and
the promise of the future.
Yeah. And they forgot one part of that
promise, though. All
gene based vaccines,
independent of manufacturers,
produced the same result
in the vaccinees.
He has looked at 15
in the last four days.
The number has been increased to seventy
individuals who died after vaccination.
These will be who died at home,
at work, in the car, doing their sports,
etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
There's no question now anymore
about what is going on,
and the answer is
in the organs of these people.
In ninety percent,
he found
clear
evidence
for autoimmune
self attack
by killer lymphocytes
on the tissues.
Oops. Sorry about that. Forgot that the, opening
was on that.
But doesn't that seem like a relevant part
of the conversation?
Right? That the reality of the peer reviewed
science shows you that anything not I mean,
I shall include this too.
This was an important conversation on this.
Oh, wait. Is that working? I think that's
it.
Yeah.
Oh, no. Damn it.
That's crazy. That doesn't come up here. Let
me just look real quickly. The point was
the one of these very important studies found
that it was the the mRNA platform that
was the problem.
There it is.
I'll grab this one too since it's right
there.
Study finds mRNA platform.
Not not what you know, not everything and
I do believe there's
many other moving parts to what makes this
dangerous, and we've gone over all of it.
But the platform itself, which is one of
the biggest issues, because they're they're talking about
using the platform and putting a new,
you know, new code, which it pumps out
the new antigen, possibly internally, which is what
DARPA has been working on or has already.
But that is driving myocarditis.
So when they try to tell you they're
moving, you know, Stargate platform, well, that's the
point. They're still using the same broken starting
point. That matters, guys. And people like doctor
Bakhti
and
and like, Arna Burkhardt and plenty of other
very passionate and
good people tried to warn us.
MRNA platform is dangerous, dual use technology.
Many shows, we tried to ring this bell
way back when, and now, you know, new
mainstream alternative are breaking things down that are
old news.
But more winning, in case you missed it.
The winning just won't stop, I wrote. US
FDA on May 27
approves use of Sanofi's
how do you say that? Meningococcal
vaccines and meningitis
in infants in infants.
Now maybe you don't think it's a problem.
Maybe you think it's okay.
Now I just think it's interesting that from
a core point, the most of this, MAGA
or Maha,
we're pretty resistant to most injections. And I
think a lot of it is not necessarily
just any injection, but the the the basis
of it. The FDA, the CDC, the companies
involved, all of it's broken, and and everyone
seems to know that.
So this is problematic for a lot of
those reasons, but let me just break it
right down to what Aaron Siri had to
point out, which is somebody you should be
paying attention to. FDA just shamefully approved
men, men quad fee, quad fee, men quad
fee, I think, to be injected into infants
six weeks
to two years old based on a trial
that compared it to men,
menvio,
which, by the way, before I even saw
this was exactly what I found too. And
we just talked about this with the past
shot. Oh, see, I've grabbed that one too.
I always forget these things when I'm breaking
the show down or getting ready,
which is why I always have so many
additional, you know, at late additions as I
put underneath the links at the end of
the show.
Yeah. This was
FDA approves new mRNA COVID shot using a
vaccine as the placebo,
which is something we were all calling out
during that, and and RFK Jr was adamant
about Everything going forward will be now placebo
based. Okay. Well, you can read through this
for yourself, and it shows you very quick.
Now if you if you look into the
data, it does show that at some levels,
there was a placebo used. Saline.
The point is not about here and there,
but using it consistently to make sure it's
not manipulated by the companies using, like this,
a vaccine to compare to another vaccine.
And you can see phase three
phase so
three phase three studies in US infants,
and every one of them, as you'll see
right here,
compared to another injection
on every one of them that we can
see in this one, though. My point is,
if you those appear that some level of
the research, there was something that was used
in that regard, but they're showing you the
basis of the current release and showing you
that they're comparing it to other injections.
The only thing that does is make it
look, like, less dangerous because the side effects
are, you know, you have some here and
a little bit more as opposed to nothing
and a lot more. That's the point. And
so he points out,
compared it to Muneebaud,
in the trial, five point three percent of
the infants receiving MENQUADFE
and three point six percent of infants receiving
MENVEO had a serious adverse reaction, which means
something very serious. See definition below. He says,
but
because these rates were similar,
this product was deemed safe, and that's how
that works. By the FDA because it assumes
men be always safe, just like they use
with the Moderna shot. That was the point.
And that was that conversation. They used the
other Moderna shot because they claim it's safe,
the same one that RFK told you was
dangerous, but they used it and they're okay
with that to compare to the new one.
And that one's now safe too because that
one was safe even though neither of them
are safe. It's it's infuriating,
and you all know it. And the people
out there that are still trying to find
a broken way to pretend that you can
support this. Guys, you need to reckon if
you wanna pretend he's being blackmailed, maybe you're
right. Stop,
you know, floundering in the middle waiting for
something. Call it out. That's why I respect
Mary Talley Bowden and plenty of others that
are just, you know, they wanna support this,
but they are they have principles. And they
go, this is wrong. We know it's wrong.
And he continues. He says, but MenVIO was
licensed based on the trial in which
Menomoneo
was used as a control. This is what
we're talking about. And Menomoneo was licensed based
on a trial in which Menomone was used.
All these all these are injections as a
control, and on and on and on. It
says
and that one was not licensed based on
a proper placebo based trial. In fact, and
this is mind twisting, the package insert for
the the ORIGIN one, the Menomu,
lists the clinical trial for Menactra
in which Menomu was used as the control.
Like, think about that circular logic as the
basis for the safety. I couldn't even dream
of making this stuff up. So you what
you can in case you missed that, they're
taking one of these shots, and they're comparing
it to the other shot to make sure
that the one was safe, which is manipulation.
Right? But then they the other one points
back to that one to make sure that
it's a shade to say that that one's
safe, like, in these trials.
Like, if you don't I mean, the point
is that is
deliberately dishonest.
They know what they're doing, and they're hiding
a massive percentage of problems. Four percent is
a huge amount of children, and I don't
even trust that number. But it says this
provides a good example of the vaccine safety
pyramid scheme.
Metamu was licensed without a proper placebo controlled
trial
and was then used as a control to
license Menactra. Menactra is then used as a
control to license MenVio, and then MenVio is
used as a control to license MenQuadafi
or Quadphy. And then we get the trial
with five point three percent and three point
five percent of infants suffering serious adverse reactions,
but no one bats an eye.
They grant licensure.
A pyramid scheme of safety at the bottom
of which there is no baseline on which
safety can be judged. Just
get it licensed to profit, shell game. FDA
and pharma have nothing to lose here. We
as taxpayers will pay for all the harms
suffered and most of worst of all, the
children who are injected and harmed and their
families will really pay for the harms.
Ask Addie to Gary and plenty of others.
I just think it's so infuriating. Oh, here.
Look, there's Mary right there.
She says, I thought we were requiring true
placebo is going forward. Yeah, exactly.
It's just it's depressing because I I, like
many, at least hoped that maybe he would
bring some positive. And I've seen a couple
of things that I think it's a good
step, but I just don't know how we
get past this.
And here, this is the whole thing. You
can read through it all for yourself, and
it shows exactly what he's talking about.
Now one overlapping point that I wanted to
highlight just to show you the kind of
broken direction, which is common for Republicans around
cannabis, but just in general, I think. It
just shows you that what a bad direction
we're going in.
Laura Ingram, of course,
has, what's his name, doctor Mark Siegel. He
said he says, people think weed is going
to help you sleep at night, decrease your
anxiety, treat pain. None of this has been
shown medicinally. Oh, literally has so many times
over. It increases your anxiety. It doesn't help
you sleep. It doesn't treat pain. This is
a doctor.
Now I'm not saying you have to agree.
The bottom line is this is such a
the amount of evidence
is staggering
to the point to where even the US
government was prescribing this as medicinal
for people when they had it at schedule
one
in the eighties.
I mean, it's just so dishonest, and it
really comes back to control. And and, you
know, the idea that hemp itself now for
all those that wanna pretend it's about just
don't want you, just wanna smoke. Well, yeah,
that's true in one regard. But realize that
if you wanna make that the case, fine.
Illegalize it. I don't care. Realize that we're
talking about taking a whole plant and putting
it in your body. Put it in the
shape. Grind it up. That's what we're actually
talking about. Now there's many ways to do
that, and some of them include ingesting it,
which you can get high from. The bottom
line is these are two different conversations.
Right? There there are undeniable
medicinal purposes. And I'm not gonna go all
I always want to. The frustrating reality that
you still have people like this going on
ridiculous shows like hers and screaming things that
are patently false, it's no different than anything
else. But ask yourself why?
They really want you to be that unhealthy?
It seems that way.
I said completely false, scientifically proven to be
false
many, many times over.
But as we can see today all see
today more than ever, politics leads the charge,
not facts. And And I'll include this article
I wrote a long time ago.
The the 10 top 10 marijuana myths that
no one should believe. And I go through
this with in-depth. I mean, each one of
these actually links to their an article of
their own,
which goes into more depth about this that
one discussion point. Right? This one's just about,
marijuana is more harmful than cigarettes, alcohol, and
prescription drugs.
Easy to prove. So shockingly false. And And
we go into in-depth with different links and
so on and link to all the next
of the shows. The point is this one's
the one that has all 10 of them
listed with the breakdown.
I mean, guys, these things are broken down.
The source material is through the roof.
It's just insane how obvious it is, and
people just lie about it because they're being
driven by special interests. That's what politics is.
And here's what's funny.
Twitter fact checked it and said, look, here
is an actual study from the NCBI
that proves what he's saying is false.
Therapeutic effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. Like, it's
just it's right there. So here's what's crazy,
and it shows you what purpose Twitter and
the rest of it served today.
So it said that. I even took a
screenshot just in case it went away.
Watch this.
And then this is how the whole fact
check it's it's just it's just mob rule
on this platform. Now it's gone. No longer
there as if it ever existed. You know
why? Because somebody out there who has more
interest or more effort or more influence wanted
that to go away. Are we claiming that
study is false?
I mean, the study you just saw, it's
a peer reviewed study and it breaks it
down based on scientific evidence. God forbid, we
should actually have a fact check on here
that proved it, but that's how Twitter works.
Somebody came in and overruled it and no
longer there. Probably people on the top of
the platform.
That's that's the world for today, guys. That's
how this works.
Now, Palantir
has to be mentioned in the context of
health because it is overwhelmingly
obvious. The Panopticon discussion, which we all we
just that was one of the things we
discussed in the recent panel. IMA, the Palantir
AI Panopticon.
The health part
is one aspect of the larger control structure.
And I wanna include this teletracking, Palantir partner
for health care AI solutions.
We have Palantir's collection of disease data at
the CDC is now stirring privacy concerns. This
was on June 6.
It's it's not this is all one massive
grab, guys. That's the point. And through it,
controlling your lives.
And as Jason points out, if you can't
see this by now, and and it's enough
you don't have to take it as it
is the same thing, but just recognize that
just like total information awareness becomes Palantir and
it's the same thing, or XAI
becomes XAI, but it's different people running it,
DARPA, now now Elon Musk.
The bottom line is the agenda that you're
seeing rolled out as some fighting immigration, fighting
the deep state, going against woke Democrats
is the great reset we saw of world
economic world economic forum rolled out under Biden's
administration under the guise of fighting climate change,
of fighting the it's the same outcome.
It's I mean, almost every same point is
included. There's just a different narrative about them.
And so, Steve Jason points out, same architecture,
same AI surveillance, same agenda, just rebranded and
marketed for the right as the Scooby Doo
meme, you know, Palantir on the mask and
takes it off, and this is World Economic
Forum.
I mean, just consider it. I mean, objectively,
not reflexively push back because you secretly think
we're Democrat. Look at the data points. Look
at what's happened. Look at the great reset.
Look at what they proposed, and you tell
me you don't see the same things happening.
Now interestingly with the Stargate point. Right?
Remember that's Oracle right there, Larry Olson.
That's SoftBank,
which is one of the financial, you know,
basically the financial arm of The US the
Israeli UN a 200 kind of startup business
dynamic. And then you've got OpenAI,
which by the way, I I don't think
we're getting it today. I might have it
later. But the interesting overlap of OpenAI and
what that what's happening with that about oh,
I didn't include it today. The point about
a recent court
outcome that Orville shared with me showing that
they're now saying that we're required by law
to keep your chat logs forever.
I'm sure that was totally organic.
And our point was, that's probably what's happening
with Grok too. I think that's the whole
point. But Stargate,
mRNA injections, AI, transhumanism,
Trump partners with technocrats.
And this was about they claimed about cancer.
You saw the clip earlier. Right? Well, my
point is you can see things like this
coming out. New blood tests can detect cancer
up to three years before you have symptoms.
Or maybe they're wrong, or maybe it's you're
being lied to. Sorta like, you know, you
woulda gotten sick if it wasn't there, or
good thing I had it. I woulda gotten
sick. It's very easy to have had that
kind of logic, but I just think that
things like this are being driven forward, including
causing the cancers they claim they wanna treat.
Just my opinion.
But this was from February,
2021.
This is the overlap of COVID nineteen points
and the idea of the technocratic direction we're
going in. This is what we've talked about
a lot, the wireless body area network, Y
band.
An intelligent and energy efficient wireless body area
network to control coronavirus outbreak.
Interesting.
2021.
Just showing you that this is we're in
the time of these things being coming real.
I just want to point out that these
things have been around for a while, or
will show this as well with me for
a while.
Been talked about being pushed out. So this
says, in this regard, wireless body area networks
can be used in conjunction with machine learning
and the Internet of Things to identify and
monitor the human body for health related information.
This is Stargate, guys. That is the overlap
of all this. That overlaps with Langer and
and Lieber and the whole damn, you know,
the whole kit kaboodle as it were. And
it says,
which in turn can aid in the early
diagnosis of diagnosis of diseases?
This paper proposes a novel coronavirus body airy
net body area network, a COVban
model based on Internet of techno Internet of
things technology as a real time health monitoring
system for the detection of the early say
stages of coronavirus infection using a number of
wearable biosensors to examine the health status of
the patient.
For the long term sustainability of the sensor
devices, the development of energy efficient wideband is
critical.
To address this issue, though a long range
based Internet of Things program
is used to receive biosensor signals from the
patient and transmit them to cloud directly for
monitoring.
So you add the level of techno
nanotechnology and stuff that we've talked about for
a long time, and this becomes something much,
much, much more alarming. And I think that's
where we're at. But just consider that in
the point of where all these things are
coming together with things like this, for example.
This was on June 6. TSA developing wearable
sensors to replace physical pat downs. You know?
Because everyone's gonna go, well, good. Give me
whatever it means that so you don't have
to grope me every time. And, you know,
using that kind of tactic to get you
to take readily what they would want you
to like, that you would otherwise fight. Let's
put it that way.
I'll include the show. Make sure you watch
this great conversation about Palantir with the IMA.
Here's James Corbett's work going back to 2022,
how Palantir conquered the world.
I'll include Derek's article recently of welcome to
the Palantir world order, all very much worth
your time. Carrie pointed this out saying the
craziest part of the Elon Trump feud is
that Palantir and the technocrats
are still buying your they're still building your
digital prison in partnership with the authoritarian police
state. And none of these megalomaniacs
care that you don't like it and don't
consent because they have the state's monopoly on
violence to force it on you while you
keep voting for authorities to save you from
the problems they create.
The more you know.
Lastly, on June 5 for the segment anyway,
Trump administration to rebrand
Biden era artificial intelligence safety institute. Commerce secretary
says at AI honors,
we're not going to regulate it. Now realize
that the senate, unless it's happened today, which
I didn't see, still has to pass the
big bill, which would and I believe they're
changing some stuff, and I think that's hopefully
regard the no oversight for ten years of
AI, which I kinda felt was gonna fly
through, but seems like somebody wants to at
least, hopefully, that's what they're focused on. Remember,
in that bill, it said no oversight of
AI
for ten years
while what's happening is going it's just it's
mindless. As top top of that, talking about
decision making processes, artificial intelligence
being used for government. It's already happening for
the GSA and others, but they're talking about
rolling it out. And that's what I think
this is about. But here it says, as
we move from large language models to large
quantitative models and we add all these different
things, we want a place to go.
We say, has someone checked out this model?
Is this a safe model? Is this a
model that we understand?
How do I do this? He says, and
we're not going to regulate it. How do
you ask those questions and end with that?
And he says, we're we are going to
enhance the vol the voluntary models of what
great American innovation is all about. That's like
pretending you can allow that with nuclear bombs.
Yeah. It's all about freedom and liberal and
and, you know, and, and innovation.
So every Joe in their in their garage
just start working on nuclear weapons. Right? We'll
see what we can figure out. It's just
that's how dangerous this is. Now I'm not
worried about the average guy in their computer.
I'm talking about what these
unfettered like, the the unregulated
complete what you know, we're talking about x
AI, Elon Musk, richest man in the world
kind of influence and acts resources
unparalleled.
No oversight should scare every American, and they're
trying to make it sound like that's, you
know, the recreation of the American West. You
know, it's it's just it's
aimed at people that are gonna fall for
it, I think.
Now, of course, the obvious begins to I
mean, right now, this is what I was
talking about earlier about the people like this
coming out and saying, you know, you should
stand up for Trump because he did this.
At a time when it's obvious that people
have never been more concerned on the right
about what's going on, people like Lauren Loomer
come out and say this. Time to deploy
Palantir tech to Los Angeles
to deal with the illegals.
You
know, you'd love to see it. You're lying
if you'd say you wouldn't. She loves to
project her disgusting nature and everybody act like
it's okay that she's disgusting, sort of like
calling for family members to be deported or
attacked or tell you know, just the or
saying that Muslims shouldn't be in congress because
they're all evil. Like, she's a terrible person.
The bottom line is to point to tech.
Palantir. Let's bring in Palantir. Oh, you mean
exactly like we were telling you was going
to be the justification?
She's earning her money for sure.
Now people are literally calling for Palantir surveillance
because illegals. Like, is it I mean, literally
what we predicted. It's not hard to see
coming. But, I mean, it's just mind blowing
that these are people pretending to be America
or fighting for American interests. And they are
the ones that are literally laying it brick
by brick the destruction of this country.
Now, I'm of the mind that people like
this don't care. I think their influence is
coming from something outside this country personally but
that's not I'm not who else the evidence
is what we would need the bottom line
is whether they know it or not they're
acting in the interest of obvious obvious anti
American outcomes.
To pretend that we need an invasive technology
surveillance database to go after people that we
already I mean, it's just lunacy. And on
top of that, we're talking about people protesting
illegal actions from an authoritarian
government.
It's just these people are either you know,
there's a lot of people out there that
are gonna find ways to justify this because
of their team.
Let's not forget, though,
this kind of stuff is right on the
surface. People like that don't care.
FBI Palantir Glitch allowed unauthorized
access to private data. Whoopsie.
Yeah. No big deal, though. Whoops. What happens?
Nothing.
Or was it even not a glitch at
all, and we were just using it as
an excuse? The bottom line is this is
too much power in one location and people
like Laura don't care.
And then she, of course, adds this, and
we'll talk about the California overlap.
So here you see police arresting
left wing thugs. They frame it as it's
just so funny how childishly partisan people are
for targeting ICE and law enforcement. Yeah. Yeah.
I I I haven't gone through every piece
of evidence out there. I'm willing to believe
pretty easily that there are people involved here
that would attack a cop or people that
would break the law or people that go
out there and break a window on all
sides of the paradigm. Now, also,
you can assume or consider rather that these
could be people that are doing it from
the other side to frame them. And if
if you're gonna pretend that the right wouldn't
do that, you're a child. It happens on
both sides all the time and you damn
well know it. They're all petty. Partisans are
petty and we know it.
So the point is to frame this as
anything other than these people and what they're
doing is
opportunity. You're taking advantage of this to scream
your narrative. And get this.
She says, just like I said, we're witnessing
the summer of jihad. The summer of okay.
Wait. You got Americans protesting
against the US Trump administration
deporting illegal aliens. Are they from Muslim countries?
Well, no. By and large, they're they're from
South from Southern Mexico,
South America.
Okay. So how are we going with jihad?
Well, because that's the way you're this is
the narrative. Right? Anyone that's fighting against this
is somehow Hamas jihad supporter. Well, she goes,
oh, well, they're all one kifas. Well, no.
Some of them are.
But you see, this is the level of
journalism you get from the mainstream alternative media.
So now it's all a bunch of jihad.
Who were who does that work for?
Israel.
No. Over anybody else, that is what Israel
wants to manufacture, the illusion of that, and
that's been her job for a long time.
This is the perfect example, she says, of
the communist Islamic
red green alliance.
Oh, so Palestine.
Communist Islamic. I mean, I don't think she
realized how stupid she is in a lot
of ways. It says, oh, and guess who
funds it? Qatar and the Muslim brotherhood. You
you mean Israel?
I mean and and and what evidence are
you presenting to show that any of these
people are being funded by anything, and some
of them probably are like you are, but
you're they're standing out there protesting something that
is
objectively wrong. What they're doing is illegal in
a lot of ways. No. Not just deporting
people, but branding up people who don't have
a who aren't running breaking laws, not giving
people due process,
grabbing people at their at their meetings, going
to try to become a citizen like we
tell them they're supposed to and kicking them
into El Salvador Or arresting a teen who
was in the wrong place at the wrong
time, who's now in El Salvador apparently forever.
Even though he's not a criminal, there's no
gang connections, he happened to be where he
wasn't supposed to. And the ICE member even
said, that's not the guy. And they said,
take him anyway.
All on the record. That guy is El
Salvador. He's a teen. How about the barber,
the gay guy, who's apparently never come back,
even though it's been proven he's not a
gang member? I mean,
over and over and over. And so God
forbid somebody should be protesting this unilateral
authoritarian action.
But that makes them Muslim brother Jihadists, apparently.
See, there's a lot of gross people out
there. I don't I don't think it's close
to the majority, but people like this
gobble it up.
They love to see hatred and division and
vitriol and watching people suffer, making fun of
people, having them lose what they care about.
That's what people thrive on
every single day. And if you can't see
it, you're probably one of them.
Now, here is the biggest problem from this.
So you got the loaners out loaners out
there screaming for what gives the government the
justification to remove more of your rights as
she pretends while she's America
Department of Defense Security
for the protection of Department of Homeland Security
functions.
Now this is a broad executive order,
but he's using what's happening right now to
justify to roll out the the National Guard,
which as I understand it, unless it comes
from California, would be also be a violation.
But in this very executive order outlines that
they are allowed
to bring in the military.
So we're gonna talk about pussy comitatus again.
Before I go there, it says numerous incidents
of violence and disorder have recently occurred
and and threatened to continue in response to
the enforcement of the federal law. That's, you
know, a lot of ways you could argue
that's not accurate.
By US ICE immigration
by ICE and other United States personnel who
are performing federal functions supporting the faithful execution
of federal immigration laws.
So in the same conversation, as you can
say, that they claimed that everyone in the
red hat was somehow a Nazi because you
were protesting and one guy did something, In
the same conversation, they are now claiming that
because somebody here did something violent, therefore, literally
anybody protesting here is now, according to Loomer,
a jihadist. And secondarily,
they can then take action to shut you
down because you're all part of some national
security threat. Like, how do we not as
Americans objectively
see how lazy and obvious that is?
They're using even real things to roll out
an all encompassing shutdown of your constitutional rights.
I just it's so transparent, and it kills
me that there's not more people who have
the courage to stand up and scream about
this.
And this this is not even the same
as saying you support or don't support what
Trump is doing. This is just obvious that
it's being used.
And it says to the extent that protests
or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution
of laws as they see it, there's plenty
of things they're doing that are illegal. And
it says they constitute a form of rebellion
against the authority of the government of the
United States. So you're protesting, if they deem
it getting in the way of what they
think is legal, you are now not just
breaking the law, you are rebelling against the
government. You're an insurrectionist. You're going to prison
for the rest of your life. You don't
see that as an extension, as an extreme
action?
I'm just I'm genuinely worried about the people
that have that much influence who are driving
Americans to their doom
and yucking it up along the way and
making tons of money. They're the worst people
out there.
He says, I hereby call into federal service
members of units of the National Guard
to temporarily
protect ICE and other US government personnel who
are performing federal functions.
And you realize a lot of this stems
back to the idea that they're somehow arguing
that they need to stay secret because evil
bad guy, they manufactured
all this. These people were wearing masks before
there was ever any pushback,
which is crazy. They're government officials or government
entities. You're required. We have every right to
know who they are. And there's no doxing
somebody who works for the federal government. They're
allowed their names is supposed to be this
will be public information.
And yet they're pretending they're being put their
lives at risk by doxing them.
I just I just I'm really I really
hope
that there's not as many people as it
seems that are willing to go along with
this, whether they know what's wrong or they
don't know what's wrong.
That would make me really unhappy to think
there's that many people out there that are
this uninformed about the reality.
It says at least 2,000 National Guard personnel
and the the duration
of duty shall be for sixty days or
at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense.
In addition, the secretary of defense may employ
any other members of the regular armed forces
as necessary
to augment and support the protection of federal
functions and and property in any number of
determined appropriate in this discretion. That's a crime,
guys.
It's very simple.
K? This is posse comitatus, 18 USC one
three eight five, use of army, navy, marine
corps, air force, and space force as a
posse comitatus. Now that basically means, and I'll
just read it again directly from this,
like a a group of men round up
to to enforce the law or whatever they
frame it as. This is a body of
men, typically armed, summoned by a sheriff to
enforce the law in the normal context. The
point is, even with a sheriff, you can't
just do that
unless there is a legal justification. In this
case, it'll read right here from the law.
Whoever
except in cases
and under circumstances
expressly authorized by the Constitution
or an act of Congress,
Right? So the Insurrection Act, for example,
or allowed within the constitution.
That's the point about the National Guard and
a lot of different things. Except for that,
whoever willfully uses any part of the army,
the navy, the marine corps, the air force,
or the space force as a policy comitatus
or otherwise to execute the laws, so even
with things that are legal,
shall be fined under this or imprisoned
for
not more than two years or both.
So it's very executive order is not the
constitution. That's not an act of Congress.
So just one more example of them skirting
what is supposed to be sacred to this
country or the liars like Lou or pretend
they care about free speech and scream for
you to be censored because of Israel or
say things like they care about
the constitution in general and then support things
like this. They either don't know what they're
talking about, I I think it's both, but
more so the latter, or they are fighting
for something other than your American interests.
So when he writes that and says that
can happen, what do you think is gonna
happen? And do you think anyone's gonna care?
You think that the people in Congress are
gonna step up and maybe somebody when they
see an opportunist moment, which we should point
to,
but I find that pretty concerning.
So just because it's evil Gavin Newsom, which
I think is disgusting, and bad Democrats in
California,
which is the big boogeyman, the most rebel,
they're gonna ignore this, I bet.
If you're smart, if you care, if you
believe in the constitution, you should stand up
and call this out. And sure, but like
I support Trump, Democrats are bad, but that's
wrong. Don't we care about the constitution, guys?
And then of course, people like Cap'Tir will
come and cut you out at the knees
because you're supposed to be supporting Trump. That's
the reality of all this.
Keep track. Keep an eye on this, guys.
This is gonna get worse.
Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members after Los
Angeles integration protests. Now to be clear, that's
my opinion. I I I don't see how
this doesn't escalate. I hope it doesn't. It'd
be great if it somehow diminished because I
think it's only gonna cause more violence, and
then they're gonna use that violence to rationalize
more suppression of our rights. Left or right,
it's the same shtick every time.
So just to be clear,
whether or not there are people out there
protesting violently, a lot of people are simply
protesting against this. And honestly, that's what a
lot of these Republicans don't like.
That's it. And they wanna see him punished
because they're just doing what they don't like.
And that's how the game goes both ways.
That's why it's pretty infuriating for a lot
of us that just wanna get beyond the
childish two party paradigm. That's how they keep
this all going.
Now Bennet Johnson, of course, adding to his
he's he's very much a part of this
manipulation.
When someone shows you who they are, believe
them.
They're not innocent immigrants looking for a better
life.
How the hell do you know that?
Like, this disgusting nature of just broad stroking
everybody because of some propagandized
video that was out. I mean, how do
we know anything about this? You're gonna tell
me that because one guy is driving around
that with a flag that, therefore, nobody there
has good intentions?
It just it it you know that's dishonest.
I don't care if it's everybody but five
of them. He's still lying to you. The
reality is a lot of people in this
conversation are truly standing up for people's rights,
Not whether or not they're a criminal, therefore,
their rights don't matter. But regardless of your
background, your rights matter.
Aren't these America people supposed to agree with
that?
Not unless not if they hold the Mexican
flag, apparently. He says they're militant, Paris parasitic
invaders looking to destroy and destabilize a county
they did not build and do not love.
How would you know any of that stuff?
This is an emotionally constructed narrative that's made
to make you hate anybody who you think
is involved with this.
Just be outraged about that. It's just it's
pure and just unadulterated manipulation
using things they want you to hate. That's
their shtick.
Now this clip is simply showing you a
guy riding around
car
where two of them, like, with one guy
holding a Mexican flag. Doesn't that seem strange?
I mean, obviously, it certainly could be the
case.
But, I mean, are we not even able
to consider whether some of these things are
being manufactured
to justify certain government actions?
I mean, my God, if it was Biden,
they would they wouldn't even need a video.
They would just make things up, which certainly
possible.
These people but my point is that it's
so amazing how willing they are to look
at things that might undermine the point
except when it's their side.
I just think that's silly. And so what
does this even have to mean? So one
guy's got a Mexican flag, therefore, literally everybody
there is not allowed
dishonest and wants to hurt the country?
I just can't even get past how
childishly dishonest these people are.
So here is a clip from Alex Jones.
Governor Newsom is calling Trump drained for sending
troops into Los Angeles to quell the illegal
alien communist insurrection.
Do I need to make any more point
for that?
I mean, are we really can we not
laugh at how dumb these people are? How
ridiculous and cartoonish
the illegal alien communist insurrection?
Like, it's like they just lean into the
dumbest parts of these narratives. Okay. So if
you're gonna start
flimsily throwing around insurrection,
aren't you just as bad as the ones
that call January 6 an insurrection? Yeah. You're
actually worse because this is a
pilot protest, an insurrection.
Are they trying to take over government buildings?
Are they armed by a state actor? What
are you talking about? You're only causing the
division. I thought we were World War three,
Alex. Didn't that already start? Oh, wait. I
guess that turned out like I thought, which
is they responded to Ukraine and everything keep
going the way it was. And we didn't
end on day one. Still an important war.
Still very violent and crazy. Certainly not World
War three, though. Like, you screamed,
what, every day for the last hundred years?
I'm just so tired of these people driving
you to hate everybody based on political background,
deranged for sending troops. Now do we know
what was happening in California, or was the
assumption that it was because it was a
Democrat place that they wouldn't do anything about
it? Or is it wrong for them to
not to violently overthrow and stop protests?
Are we calling for the government to stop
people from protesting now because somebody was violent?
Isn't that what you guys called out around
your protest? I could do this all day
long.
I just hope that people can start being
honest about this and people like this could
seem for what they are. He says, meanwhile,
the Los Angeles Police Department says the protests
are peaceful and without incident. Yeah. Because the
media lies. I said, new? Are we suddenly
unaware that the media lies to us from
both sides of the paradigm? The bottom line
is it's not just the Democrats like your
shtick. It's all of our government lying to
us to execute certain agendas. And while tap
dancing clowns like Alex Jones get you focused
on the division
wedge issues,
is still building out their control structure. Israel
is still committing a genocide. Your government is
still reducing your rights in front of you
as he points at things that are happening
during the in the in the
the wedge, I guess.
And that's supposed to be okay.
It infuriates me as I'm sure you can
tell. Yeah. You you you certainly can make
this stuff up, Alex. You do it every
day.
So all we're seeing guys are people
breaking law, put them in jail. Are we
really gonna pretend that people that are protesting
violently are is to rationalize
deploying the military? Do you know what he
would do if Obama or Biden deployed the
military,
not the national guard? You already know because
he fleshed at that every time they blinked.
Not when Trump does it though, because Democrats
are the deep
state. It's just a cartoon.
Now I wanna be really clear about this
by the way. I'm not saying that these
people shouldn't be held accountable for their crimes.
Put them in jail. Highest,
hold to the highest,
you know, strictest level of law. They're breaking
the law if they're doing so. But you
know, as well as I, there's a lot
of people out there that are simply protesting
against crimes that are being committed by our
government.
Brad Miller sees it.
And you see this person, Kurt, they're all
desperately trying to divide everybody.
He shows a picture of Trump with this
clearly ridiculous are we still not acknowledging how
silly that whole thing was? Right? That you
just don't have any you know,
I'm so tired.
We don't all obviously know what a completely
manipulated event that was. Now they're lying to
you. On top of that, their administration tells
you there was only one person shooting. Are
we really still
falling for all of this? He goes, choose
a side America and shows a random guy
waving a Mexican flag
and then Trump.
So are we still pretending it's a jihadi
thing? Are we now is are we now
back to the border? Or is it just
both whenever you want it to be? Or
on top of that, the idea that we're
choosing sides between what?
Brad says the two images below don't represent
different sides. Stop assuming engineered problems and reactions
leading to predetermined solutions.
Represent two different sides of a situation.
These crafted dialectical traps,
dialectical traps are used over and over and
over again because people keep falling for them.
Some people see it. I'd like to believe
it's the majority.
Now Kyle Kalinski, who I'm very much not
a fan of, simply makes a point that
I agree with. And he says the same
politician that say flying a Mexican flag in
LA is cause for deportation
have an office like this.
He's not wrong.
I it's it's just it's just the chosen
outrage.
Right? That's okay. That's okay to literally have
the Israeli flag closer and more prominent than
the American flag. But, you know, god somebody
waves his own flag, if that's even the
case. I mean, I'm very I'm starting to
wonder at this point how many of these
things are completely being contrived.
A guy with a mask on covering his
face driving over the Mexican flag seems a
little bit too contrived to me, but certainly
could be possible or certainly obviously could be
real.
But here's the Stephen Miller point and this
is what I'm talking about with Jones and
the rest taking the marching orders and running
with it. He says this is a violent
insurrection.
I just
the more you frivolously throw around things like
insurrection,
which is the same point they were saying
before when it was being leveled at them,
it or or even how about antisemitism?
It makes it meaningless.
The idea is these are people throwing rocks
at a government
at a at a, what is it? ICE,
oh, it's, CBP
agents driving by in their vehicle.
And that's an insurrection?
That should insult you, especially as you've been
called an insurrectionist for simply being present.
Stephen Miller,
Zionist here, is absolutely destroying this country.
And all you're seeing here?
So,
yeah, so go out there and arrest them
if it's a crime.
Like this game you play where it cascades
into just everything now is illegal, how do
you not see that as anti American?
Everyone should care that rights are whether see,
the problem is they've convinced you that the
Democrats, you shouldn't care about their rights being
suppressed because they hate you.
Now Miller hates you. Right? They hate you,
and they are pitting you against your neighbor.
Now this is interesting.
Protests.
Where was that? Oh, wait. Oh, I forget
to grab that. Hold on.
Make sure I grab that.
Oh, I still okay. I got it right
here. I just wanna make sure I have
the video. So LA protest, this is from
today.
All of a sudden, because of all these
screaming cries of insurrection and what did they
do? Well, they used it. They used it
to rule out the executive order that justifies
military deployment, and then they
I I mean, I don't even know how
to frame it just yet because we'll have
to see what really becomes of it, but
it seems they are loading up for war.
Video of Blackhawk helicopter dropping off boxes sparks
alarm.
It's a surreal sight. This Blackhawk moved in
just in the last few minutes from the
border patrol landing at that homeland security office
on the Paramount side right next to the
Home Depot, and they are unloading this huge
helicopter
with, I mean, just boxes and boxes, dozens
of boxes of ammunitions,
less lethal weaponry. You see these tanks with
flammable labels on the side.
One after another, an entire shipment as if
they were getting ready for some kind of
a major battle. I mean, it it really
has to be said. This is a remarkable
sight,
in in the middle of a suburban street
here where they are just unloading
all of these weapons,
carts full of boxes
and flammable weaponry. So you can see that,
it just made its own parking spot there
in the parking lot of that home. I
mean, I have to be I mean, my
whole thing I've been really worried about if
this is some outside force trying to destroy
this country, doesn't it start to feel increasingly
like we're getting there? Like, they're causing civil
war destabilization
in this country? Now I'm not you're gonna
have to assume that's what the case is,
but recognize that this is in nobody's interest.
Are we really pretending like what's going on
there justifies this kind of action?
But can't you I mean, there if again,
if people are committing crimes, hold them accountable
for it.
At the end of the day, what this
is is a ramping up of things that
create
the justification
to do more,
to reduce more rights,
to deport more people. I mean, this is
it's increasing just like we worried it was
or rather that it would. Homeland Security office
on the other side of the river where
all of this is taking place and just
a few blocks from that Home Depot and
right across the freeway from where that car
fire was just a few blocks away, and
the protesters
and sheriff's department had been squaring off. But
this site here,
at the Homeland Security Office of these federal
officials unloading
dozens of boxes of weapons and ammunition
is, just quite a sight to be so
to behold here.
Something I I really don't recall ever seeing
here. Guys, back to you.
Yeah. I definitely see where this is going.
I mean, I'm genuinely concerned for for watch
for this getting out of control.
And so this overlaps with the speech part
of it. Aaron Melnick points this out. This
is ICE,
the ICE acting director.
He is responding to political rhetoric, he says,
causing anti ICE sentiment and threats.
They say, I'm demanding that they stop.
Okay. So he's telling you you can't say
what you want. He's talking about people who
are speaking, and he's telling you he's demanding
you to stop what you're saying.
Like, again, if we're are we confused about
what free speech is in this country? It
seems that we've gotten in a really bad
place
for obvious reasons.
But are we and, like, are we debating
this now? As Aaron says, the US government
is demanding that people stop using certain political
rhetoric. This is appalling. The government cannot order
people not to speak the way they don't
like, but they sure as hell think they
can. They're literally doing that about Israel
right now, like Trump promised he would, by
the way, in, like, 17 different videos. Here
he is telling you,
demanding that you stop saying things. Now what
he's talking about is accusing the people in
ICE of doing breaking the law. They are
breaking the law. Now look, if there's somebody
out there who's doing something that comes to
the point of a crime,
or if you're putting out their home address,
right? If you're saying things about them that's
that come at the level of a crime,
then do something about it. But if they're
simply saying, I think they're breaking the law,
they have a right to say and think
that, they have a right to lie about
that, that's free speech. The argument they're trying
to make is creating this idea that they're
somehow victimized,
right? They're the victim in the situation. They're
just trying to do their job and you're
causing them to get attacked and doxxed.
Pretty sure that they can protect themselves, their
authorities, they have weapons.
If somebody tries to do something, then they'll
go to prison.
I'm not saying it's okay. I'm just saying
the idea of this preemptive action to stop
people who are trained to defend themselves,
it just seems absurd to me. Now, again,
if someone's breaking the law, then they'll be
held accountable for that. This is preemptive stuff.
This is like precrime kind of idea. They're
talking about the idea that you need to
stop saying all these things and telling it
like it is as I see it because
that's causing them to be put
you know, causing harm. Tell me how that's
different than the left saying your words are
causing violence,
pronouns, whatever else.
Now you may pretend like it's a different
thing. It's not. It's the exact same thing.
Your words are violence, left and the right
using it against you. Pay attention.
Officers and agents walk into danger so other
people can see safely at night, so kids
can make it to school safely and play
outside.
So while it's easy to be an armchair
quarterback
and make up talking points that get activists
riled up
You know, as you see it, anyway. I
mean, everybody anywhere ever talking about ICE is
not making up talking points. Plenty of us
are calling out your crimes you're committing,
But it's all about narrative control. The bottom
line is my officers and agents are out
there protecting the same people who are threatening
their safety. No. That's not true. Some of
them probably.
I can prove to you plenty of them
have been caught lying egregiously about American citizens.
But does that not matter?
Law enforcement's common sense.
Politicians need to stop putting my people in
danger. I'm not asking them to stop. I'm
demanding that they stop. Here's what I have
to say to The gall on this guy
to tell you to he he so right
there, he's controlling speech. Let's spin this around
and pretend that's a democrat.
Right? Saying that we demand Republicans stop saying
x, y, and z about what we're doing.
How would you react?
Right? Just because you're more emotionally revved up
at this topic or you you personally find
it to be more important, that's not it's
all semantics, guys. It's the idea of the
principle. He's telling you stop saying what you're
saying for x, y, and z reason.
If this was a Democrat doing it to
Republicans, you would lose your mind. Stop being
hypocrites about this and care about American interests.
Boston mayor Michelle Wu,
congressman Hakeem Jeffries, and anyone else stirring up
the outrage about what ICE does.
All politicians who I don't support, all manipulated
politicians trying to lie to you, irrelevant to
the principle. These are real people with real
families you're hurting with your ridiculous rhetoric and
inflammatory comments,
and it's time to remember that.
Okay.
Here,
Tom Homan doing the same thing.
Fox says, what actions need to be taken
against Democrats demanding that ICE be unmasked?
So, again, let's make sure we understand.
Yeah. I'll just do this 1, actually.
Same thing. What's her name? I forget her
name. Trump administration. Oh, it's Trisha
McLaughlin
saying the mayor of Nashville intentionally
doxed ICE agents.
Okay. Again, if you think I support any
politician, you're you're not following the show. The
point is about what's correct, what you can
prove,
what's right, what the accurate point is.
If you're gonna try to pretend that you
can dox a government employee, and they're not
talking about, they're not saying give us your
family's home address. They're saying who are they,
what are their names?
You have a legal right to know that,
especially if they're arresting you. Whether you're a
green card, Visa, American citizen, it doesn't change
the reality. And she's trying to make it
into something of persecution.
They're just trying to do their job, and
they're trying to dox them. And you've got
a lot of moronic people, Loomer included, screaming
about this because either they don't know what
they're talking about or they don't care about
the facts and just wanna tag team with
the people fighting Democrats.
That's wild. Now, that's whether or not they're
breaking the law. We also know that they've
been caught lying repeatedly,
making up entire stories of people they arrest.
It's not secret. It's come out in court
documents. That's not even that's not also have
to be every ICE agent. That would also
be hyperbolic. But to say that they're doxing
them and then to go after him is
just silly. But it's it's distracting enough and
it's and it's chilling because a lot of
people are now afraid to call these things
out.
He says you can't dox a government employee.
Name its public information.
This is the same Tricia McLaughlin who published
the full name and address
of Kilmar
Abrego Garcia's wife. He she did that. And
the names of their children, forcing her into
hiding. So she got some nerve she's got
some nerve to complain. Guys, she very publicly
did that. So she's gonna scream about you
knowing the names of officials of the government
or people working for the government, and yet
she has the nerve to put out their
family's address, their names.
It just it just it kills me how
dishonest these people are. Here's what Coleman had
to say. We're asking the DOJ to look
at these statements,
so words,
free speech, and see if there's something we
can do.
Does that sound like somebody who understands the
limitations of the constitution or somebody who's
overflowing with power or perceived anyway? Who wants
to try to stop you from saying the
things they don't like.
Not unique to one side or the other.
That's just government for you.
Tom, I wonder if you can speak to
that a little bit. Explain to us more.
Help everyone understand the And one quick note.
Listen to the way she sets this up.
These people are just so like, so they've
got a narrative that their whoever their producer
or their editor, they laid that for them.
Here's what we want from this. Here's what
I want him to say. So
don't ask journalistic questions. Don't ask the ask
what you know he's going to answer. Right?
Lay it out. Literally say, we know all
this is bad. We all agree, so lay
it out for us why. That's what she
does right there. And this is that's not
journalism, guys. That's propaganda. I just think it's
hilarious. They're just they're just are
creating the setup form. It's literally like a
layup or a what a setup and a
spike is what it is.
Threat that our ICE agents I wonder if
you can speak to that a little bit.
Explain to us more, help everyone understand the
threat that our ICE agents are facing by
just doing their job, why they need to
wear these masks, and also what actions need
to be taken against Democrats who are demanding
that they be unmasked. And what what would
happen if they do dox them and unleash
unleash, police their identities? Sorry. I had to
say a couple more things. So what's funny
about this ICE agents are facing by just
doing their job Yeah. You mean, like, police
enforcement? Or or so are we understand that
it was a completely benign position until suddenly
Democrats started calling for their names? Now they're
super at risk.
Pretty sure they carry a gun. Pretty sure
they're trained to defend themselves. I don't think
Democrats asking for their names are the the
I mean, it's just laughable.
Right? Are these weak snowflakes out there worried
about being pushed over by a Democrat? I
mean, what are we talking about? Nobody look.
If there's somebody out there that wants to
level violence against them, they'll end up in
prison for the rest of their life, and
you know it. They're trying to frame the
most benign thing, which is well within the
law, as putting them at risk because they
know it's an easy argument that will emotionally
grab people who wanna side with them.
It's insane. And then going forward from that
Why they need to wear these masks and
also what actions need to be taken against
Democrats who are demanding that they be unmasked.
And So why they have to wear them?
Well, because you're hiding their identity, because you
claim a Democrat wanting another name as a
threat. And then what should happen to the
Democrats demanding what is legally required of them,
which is that they're required to say their
name and that we know who they are
if they're working for the government.
These are supposed to be journalists, you understand?
What what would happen if they do dox
them and unleash Dox them
their name. At least, publish their identities.
Again, she didn't even try to hide it.
Publish their identities.
They're government employees, guys. We live in a
cartoon clown world right now. We are lost.
And it I my the word you don't
worry me the most. I don't think she
knows that. That's what's so scary. I don't
think the bondies and the gnomes and people
like this. I think they think they're the
top of their game.
That should make you wonder who the hell
is actually pulling all these shot. Who is
dictating the outcome?
It's up for you to decide.
Look. It's incredible. We're at a place where
the the the guys the men and women
who enforce law were the they're the bad
guys. And the ones who break the law,
the victims, you're kidding. Oh, so we don't
know of any cops that have ever been
the bad guy?
This this binary worldview where it's like, well,
the cops are good guys and everyone else
the bad guys. Well, in my experience, it's
pretty often the reverse.
But as Tom Homan mumbles his response, let's
let's pay attention.
I mean, how come they didn't say anything
about BLM? They're all there. They they wear
a mask. How about the protester? So this
is not an argument.
Didn't what's the context? Who's even talking about
the BLM? You're thinking they didn't care then,
just like we always tell you. So you're
the same then. So when you guys were
mad that they were doing it and they
didn't do it, well, now you're doing it
back and that's why it's okay. Are we
in kindergarten?
The point is they all wanna do it
because it's not two things. It's your government.
They're using these things to hide to to
make you okay
with not knowing who these faceless government officials
who are throwing you in prison.
That which will come back around to you
later. Right? That's the game.
It's childish. It's obvious.
Don't let it call it out.
The college campus, they were protesting against,
Israel and and the Jewish students. They're wearing
masks. I think Nobody protesting against the Jewish
students. You absolute clown. They were worried about
that for what these protesters were wearing masks.
But Worried about what? Who's supposed to be
screaming about that now? We're talking about government
officials and their names. And nobody care nobody
said anything about where would that even come
up?
Or supposed to so you're calling for their
names to come up, and you're supposed to
go, but Israel and the protesters he I
don't even it doesn't make sense. There's no
connection to between the person calling for their
names and arguing that they're supposed to be
showing their faces in Israel. I mean, it
just even makes sense. This guy has talking
points he's supposed to relate back to. Jews
are attacked in Israel and over there and
and VML and the Black Lives Matter, and
they didn't care what those protests none of
that has any bearing on whether or not
we have the names of government officials
and the context of ice to what they're
doing.
But what he does know is that if
he says Black Lives Matter, if he says
Israel and Jews attack, he knows the audience
that will get mobilized.
That's what they do. All these things are
wearing masks for one reason. Because the the
sultan ice officer is up over 400%.
The sultan ice officers. I'm sure we could
take that at face value. Right? How often
those things are true? There are being doxxed
across the country.
They're not supposed to hide their identities, bud.
And and their families are being attacked. Their
families being doxxed. I haven't seen a single
example of that anywhere. I would love right
now for anybody. I'm gonna make a note
of that. I'm willing to bet you and
I listen. Look. I I haven't even looked
into this extensively, but I'm willing to bet
you right now
anything
that that's not true, and there's literally no
evidence anywhere about that at all.
I could be wrong. I'm I'm just I'm
just I'm putting a shot out there because
this is how these people operate.
Let me know if you have let me
know in the chat.
I'm making a note right now, and I'm
gonna follow-up on this.
Because these people, like Pam Bonney, will scream
whatever the emotional thing is that gets you
to believe they're right even though 95% of
the time it shows that they're wrong. I
mean, that's I made the number up, but
the point is that's my impression on this.
It's not unique to left and right. But,
damn it, if you can't see by now
I mean, look at what happened with USAID.
Look at what happened with Doge and all
the funding, and look at what happened with
every argument from Israel. Look at what happened
with nine I mean, every single conversation.
So let me know what you think of
the chat. Let's keep playing it.
Families are being threatened, and I certainly understand
it. I allow death threats. I've been doxxed.
My fam So have I.
So should I make your speech illegal?
He's been docked. I understand it. But they're
they're wearing masks for one reason only, protect
themselves and their families. They're doing a dangerous
job. This is already dangerous job. So should
police all wear masks now? We see where
this goes. Yeah. So get ready for the
Gestapo, guys. That's what they're building out under
the under the hatred of the other side,
like everything else. You gotta wear a gun.
They got pair of Kevlar vest every day
because they're doing a dangerous job every day.
While the rest of these people, like Hakeem
Jeffries, are sleeping in his bed at night
at 3AM, nice and comfortably and safe. There's
men and women of ICE on the street
doing surveillance on significant public safety threats, really
bad characters in national security threats. They're taking
it on every day. The men and women
of the border patrol standing on a dirt
trail every night, 3AM, taking on the bad
guy. So this is another threat against ICE
agents, and we're asking the Department of Justice
to look at these statements and see if
there's something we can do. When when do
you cross that line? Yeah. Okay. So you
you did miss that, did you? Words.
Where do you cross the line? So he's
talking about speech
and people demanding that we know who they
are, which is within the law. And he
wants you to believe there's a line there
that's being crossed. I'm threatening ICE officers. And
here's the Now to be clear, if there's
somebody breaking the law, like calling somebody's family
and threatening them on the phone, there's there's
a law that could be applied there, then
then do something about it.
But the idea that you should just broadly
hide things or start breaking just ignoring other
laws because one person did this or this
guy got threatened or you're making all that
up is insane.
And it only leads to reduction of rights,
more authoritarian government, and it's exactly what we
all see coming right now. The problem, you
know, we got all these people now attacking
us. You saw that they're writing death to
ICE agents. Oh, no. Somebody said some bad
things about you. Oh, Homan, you must be
really struggling. ICE agents been threatened. Their family's
been threatened. And we got members of congress.
You got some judges out there that compare
ICE to the KKK,
ICE to the Nazis. Yeah. Those are all
called opinions, buddy.
Are we now in a world where you're
not allowed to express an opinion, especially when
it's extreme?
I mean, I just don't understand how Americans
think this lines up because he says he's
America
nothing matters.
These are the ones that are supposed to
be fighting to a fault for your constitutional
rights, not finding loopholes around it for the
other side.
You got you got city council people saying,
ICE are terrorists. They're feeding the hatred. And
here's my concern.
Just like you guys do every single day.
And that's not that's neither here nor there.
The point is you have a right to
say what you want. That's free speech, guys.
That's what it really means.
They are just trying to find ways to
argue that's where it's gone too far. And
then once that door's kicked in like fire
in a theater, it's too late. They are
gonna continue to work it back like they've
been doing the entire time. I mean, look.
I'm not trying to ignore the reality. Like,
look. This is the same point from before.
I shouldn't even have to say this because
it's obvious. There are laws in place every
single time. And if somebody breaks that law,
there are already cry there are already ways
to hold them accountable right now. The idea
that they need to take extra measures because
of crimes that might be committed, that's what
their job already is. You don't need to
point that ICE protest to argue that there's
a house of thousand things they put their
lives at risk for because their jobs are
dangerous.
If you're gonna pretend that the Democrat calling
them or whatever else, that's the threat. It's
just it's so stupid.
Anything that goes beyond that, they can do
something about.
This guy is one of the biggest problems
in this country right now. I've been doing
this a long time. It's a matter of
time
before ICE
takes a life. Oh, okay. Okay. You see
where that just went rapidly based on speech?
Or an ICE agent loses their life because
their rhetoric is at an all time high
and is being fed by people
who should be more responsible. The elected official
I mean, look. You could make the same
point just like they do about anything they're
saying about Israel, anything they're saying about Muslims
in this country, anything they're saying about any
number of things. Immigrants in general right now,
you don't see an overwhelming pushback against people
who are just simply immigrants, who are being
attacked in the streets, or their families are
getting attacked. That's happening too. But that's that's
not the point is that's not the right
thing to say. You don't say, well, that's
happening, so this one shouldn't matter. It's a
principle thing, guys. That should be called out
just like this should be called out. Either
one, there are crimes that are in place
already or rather laws that are in place
already.
Especially who should who keeps firing up this
rhetoric. I'm telling you, it's coming. There's gonna
be a tragedy because they keep
throwing gas on this flame. Great. Well, get
ready for the false flag. What that feels
like for me. Right? I mean, look, the
idea and look, it it it doesn't even
have to be a manufactured event. You understand
that people who are an authority figure, who
carry weapons and engage with dangerous criminals,
violence happens a lot of the time. People
get shot. It happens
as often it happens. So when that inevitably
happens, guess what he's gonna say? There you
go. It's their fault. Democrats did it or
they manufacture it.
Right? I mean, are we really gonna pretend
like that's not the most obvious setup in
the world? There will be something that happens
because they're dealing with dangerous criminals. Yes. I
mean, that that is part of it. They're
also arresting a lot of innocent people, which
is easily what's happening, and that's why they're
really protesting.
You know, it's like when they try to
pretend that everybody protesting Israel was somehow hating
the Jews, which he said himself.
You know, that's not true. It's it's it's
embarrassingly
wrong. And yet here we are doing it
all over again. I argue for the exact
same entity.
So going over to this next part, the
last kind of part is before we go
over Garcia.
So this is from June 4. US immigration
officers ordered to arrest more people even without
warrants. This is a public conversation.
So you are verifiably
violating any number of your own laws, and
people dare to protest that, and then you
you say they're responsible for any violence that
comes?
You talk about censoring people? You're, like, you're
violating American constitutional rights
every
And you're not even allowing these people have
we have a right to know who these
people are enforcing these laws illegally or rather
in legally
in for enforcing illegally
without warrants. We saw Stephen Miller blow up
at these people screaming and demanding more people.
He said, just go to the Home Depot.
Like, we're gonna pretend like that's just the
worst of the worst. No. That's what they're
saying. The data shows you, as I've been
showing you the entire time, the vast majority
of people, and, yes, there are some of
them that are criminals, but the vast majority
are here legally
with no criminal record,
and you could prove it. That's what's so
insane. You can quite literally go and look
for yourself, and yet people will push back
because they're lazy or they don't care about
it because of their personal politics. If you
care, the facts are out there. And that
needs to matter if you care about the
constitution because people like Homan are literally destroying
it whether they know it or not.
And I think on this one, just for
time,
basically, on this, this is just oh, maybe
we'll talk about this in the next one,
but it's could Elon Musk be deported by
Trump?
Let's see where we're at.
Well, the bottom line on this is interesting
because
this is the overlap. And I guess I'm
the the whether it's the theater aspect of
this is hard to tell.
But Bannon has come up and screamed about
about
deportation for Elon Musk as well as seizing
his company.
And what's interesting is it turns out that
the background information
is pretty compelling. And, look, Biden said something
about it, but it didn't get him most
attention. But the argument is as even Bannon
is now screaming that Elon Musk is was
illegally here. And even Elon Musk apparently said
that he had to say that or he
would have been not able to start his
business, but now claiming that's not true. Like,
a lot of stuff he says. The argument
is that he lied to get the visa
that he used for school then then he
started a business.
And then through all that over the long
term period, got naturalization. But the argument is
if you can prove that that happened, they
could revoke his not his citizenship.
And Bannon is quite literally saying he's here
illegally. Deport him right now. I just found
it to be very interesting because the overall
the the other part too is it says,
US law states the citizenship gained through naturalization
can can be revoked if it was procured
by concealment of a material fact.
But it says even if there's some evidence
of fraud, it has to be willful and
material. In other words, it has to be
intentional and have a direct impact in the
decision to grant citizenship. Now we're talking about
citizenship here, but it says this is a
high bar, and innocent misstatements or minor omissions
are not enough. So here we are of
a situation where it appears Musk is the
one leading a charge against deportation, at least
Miller is, but he's a part major part
of it, at least he was.
And yet he's just as guilty as most
of the people they're going after.
I mean, guilty is even the wrong word,
especially if we're talking about somebody like this.
The MAGA green card holder from Denmark who
was literally here for a decade,
who had a paper paperwork miscommunication
from 02/2015.
He was literally at the meeting for his
final to get citizenship, and they arrested him,
put him in prison. He's been in jail
since then.
I think the I think the hearing's coming
up right maybe yesterday or today. The point
is they even refused to let him out.
There and the guy's got a full he's
got a family. He's been here for longest
time. He's gonna show up to every single
meeting. These are the people that Miller's pushing
to go after,
and that's the problem. Right? So if you're
over here defending, you it's it's a high
bar, you have to prove that you did
it wrong. Well, they don't seem to have
that same allowance for anybody else in the
situation.
I just think it's very interesting that even
Bannon is now pushing back and saying deport
the guy. Here's another one, Trump supporter wrongly
detained by ICE. That's this guy right here.
He simply says, I voted for Trump last
election, but because I thought it was going
to to be, because I thought it was
going to be the things, you know, like,
go against criminals,
not every Hispanic looking. Like, they will assume
that they're all illegals, as we said. Because
they they they they arrested him,
and he was saying, I'm an American citizen.
We saw another video of a guy getting
tackled to the ground saying, I'm an American,
and they didn't believe him, and he was.
We had a guy from Texas that was
accused and arrested for being an illegal immigrant,
then both McLaughlin and the other person lied
about him saying he was here coming from
the Mexico part. No. He came from Texas.
Neither of them were true because he lives
in Texas. He's an American citizen.
All that came out in court or rather
in in the investigation because he they withheld
from sending him because of the court in
regard to not debauting. He probably in El
Salvador right now. The bottom line is it's
so frivolous, and it's everywhere. In this case,
the guy, they basically put handcuffs on him
because I'm an American citizen, and they they
had to force it through to even find
that out. They're laughing at him.
Musk fires back with slur after Steve Bannon
called for Trump to seize his business. So
the other continuing point on all these guys
is the idea that we how do you
not see how these these people are
I mean, what's the right word for it?
Like, dictators. They do whatever they want.
The argument they're supposed to act within the
law and we care about the constitution in
America and all of a sudden they have
a little tiff and now you're gonna at
least Bannon's calling for it to seize his
company, deport the guy. I mean, it's just
so these people don't care about what's right
or wrong. They don't care about the constitution.
They care about
their side. That's team sport politics for you.
I have I have a limited time left
here. I wanna make sure we get into
the the majority of this.
Now I pointed this out around Garcia.
I said this will blow up in their
face in the supposed in the in the
supposed incident that they're pointing to, the traffic
incident.
He was let go with a traffic ticket.
Many times did how many times did Bondi
and Noem scream? He'll never come back to
The United States.
Well, he's back now.
They'll say anything.
I just wanna make sure you understand how
crazy that is. Now we're gonna here's Bondi
back April 16.
Deported man not coming back to the country.
They must be pretty embarrassed right now. Now
we're gonna go over this.
before we do, there's that not coming back
to the country point, I wanna show a
couple things. This was a recent ruling of
the Supreme Court.
It says, it is well established that the
Amendment
entitles aliens to due process. The Supreme Court
contradicts Nancy Mason's citizenship claim, which is scary.
Right? Either she's that stupid or she's that
dishonest because just I mean, you know this,
but there's still people like her, and that's
why people out there
are screaming
that immigrants don't have rights
who want you to think that. She's a
she's a flaming Zionist. The bottom line is,
of course, they do. And even the Supreme
Court has now ruled for what, the time,
and they'll still push back on it?
Now I'll include this. You should watch this.
It's an hour long.
I go this I went this is 04/24/2025.
I went through this the whole time in
every one of these documents.
Every one of these with a podcast. One,
two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine,
ten, 10, I think I did fast, 10
or 11 links. All court documents,
all of them showing you exactly what I'm
saying in this clip. I break it down,
the whole thing. I said right now, it's
paramount Americans understand two things. One,
even illegal immigrants have the right to due
process, and here's Grock saying that.
And two, we are being lied to about
Abrego Garcia. This was called the unprecedented gaslighting
and lies around Abrego Garcia.
So the quick general breakdown on this, guys,
if you remember,
is the simple point that Garcia and we'll
we'll show you this. He was he was
I'm hoping I've got time for this, man.
I wanna go through this all. He he
was pulled over,
had a bunch of people in his car.
Now, again, to bring this back to the
origin point,
I've at least personally never, and I'm most
people honest about this, have ever tried to
argue that I somehow know he's not a
criminal. I I think most people in the
eyes of the government at least are today.
The bottom line is that it was about
due process.
Did they never in any way try to
prove the allegations of MS thirteen and easily
pointed out, these are new allegations. This what
this didn't go back to before. It was
about the idea of what currently applied to
today, the deportation. And so, yes, as we
just showed you, they're required to give him
due process. And it would have been if
they if they claim they have all the
evidence, they would have been going, look. Here
it is. Not the old document, which I'll
point at in a but the new information
that proves what you're saying and send him
anywhere but El Salvador because of the previous
Supreme Court ruling that said they couldn't. That
was from the Trump administration, by the way.
In 02/2019,
he was pulled over.
Now at that time,
the idea
or excuse me. In 2009 in,
basically, the point is the court had ruled
that he was or or rather they they
had said that he was a possible MS
13 in that discussion. Now that was the
reason that they said that in the traffic
stop. Like, the whole point is it cascaded
over on the the the document saying that,
so it was assumed.
Now in two different deep in two different,
court deportation cases or rather hearings,
it was pointed to that the cop who
took him and arrested him at l l
Home Depot
before that
wrote down MS 13.
That's all it was. And this is so
and every one of the links I include
all of our even judge Zenas in the
recent court case broke all this down.
So they said that. Now at this point
or even now, you could consider the possibility
that but what matters is what you could
prove and whether they went through due process
around it anyway. And the point is that
he points to a anonymous source that even
to this day, Joe, the rest point out
it's all hearsay.
That cop then got fired for corruption.
So it should make you question whether that
anonymous source that claimed he was a gang
member existed at all.
So it then became the process of the
deportation discussion, right, because he was here illegally.
Now it came to 2019
where that was coming to a head. And
the point was that they simply said through
these court cases that that was the cop
had claimed that. And so they said that
he was
the what was they? I think they said
they were
what's the word they used? Basically, going with
what the cops said. Not that that proved
he was MS 13. Simply saying that for
the purposes of this case and the court
deportation discussion, we're going to side, like, basically
side with the cop in that possibility and
use that to move forward with the court
deportation case. Same thing with the document they
point to. Not that it was proven he
was MS 13. They said that in the
proceedings, and same thing judge Zena said. So
the bottom line was it came back to
that anonymous source and the cop who was
fired. Now the reason they made these statements
and even to the day they say MS
thirteen is because of that same point. It's
never been a verified fact. That's why it's
so embarrassing for Trump and the whole knuckles
thing to come out to this being that
you know for sure because those those tattoos
are there when Trump
clearly
thinks that that's the case
even though you can prove that wasn't the
case.
Let's just kinda see if I could find
it real quick.
Here.
This is worth seeing again. And he wasn't
a member of a gang.
And then they looked and on his knuckles,
he had MS thirteen. There's a dispute about
it.
Wait a minute.
He had MS
thirteen on his number's tattoo. Oh, he had
some tattoos that are interpreted that way, but
let's move on. Wait a minute. Hey, Terry
Terry Terry. You did not have the letter
MS13.
It says MS13.
That was photoshopped.
So let me That was photoshopped, Terry. You
you have You did that. Hey, they're giving
you the big break of a lifetime. You
know, you're doing the interview. I picked you
because, frankly, I never heard of you, but
that's okay. And by this I picked you,
Terry. Hey, but you're not being very nice.
He had MS thirteen tattoos. We'll agree to
disagree. I want to move on to something
else. Terry,
do you want me to show you the
picture? I saw the picture. We'll we'll bring
this to you. Here we go. Here we
go. Don't Photoshop it. Go look at his
hand. He had MS thirteen. He did have
tattoos that can be interpreted that way. I'm
not an expert
turn to Ukraine, sir. I wanna get to
Ukraine.
No. No. No. He had MS as clear
as you can be, not interpreted. This is
why people no longer believe Well the news
because When he was photographed in in in
El Salvador, they aren't there. But let's just
go. They aren't there when he's in El
Salvador. They weren't there. They weren't
there now, right? No. But they're they're in
your picture. Terry. Ukraine, sir. He's got MS
thirteen on his knuckles. All right. Okay. We'll
take a look. It's such a disservice. We'll
take a look at Why did he just
say it? Yes. He does.
God. So embarrassing.
So in case you missed the point,
that's not true.
We covered this on the show. Everyone seemed
to cover it's it was it was put
there for illustrative purposes. They're claiming that the
tattoos on his fingers were the thing. And
even that has been proven by experts saying
that's not the case, that they don't do
that. You know, it's it's just it's just
so incredible. So back to the point,
the only thing thus far
was the was the insinuation from a a
corrupt cop, an anonymous source you can't prove.
Okay. So the bottom line was that Trump's
administration in 2019 gave him a withholding of
removal. Trump's administration,
knowing that and and the the cop pulling
him over in the in the traffic case,
let him off with a ticket.
We'll go we'll go over the point of
what they were claiming. The bottom line is
it ended up with a ticket. There was
no other evidence. How in the world do
you go back and relitigate that somehow? I
guess litigate's the wrong word, but
how do you point back in a at
a stop
that the cop gave a ticket for and
moved on and claimed that we have more
information now? It just seems wildly dishonest. Knowing
that they've been caught lying about this stuff
over and over, knowing that they know they're
in a bad position
because they're gonna have some legal repercussions. Don't
you think they'd be willing to kind of
build a case around this even if they
were using lies?
I personally think absolutely. Consider it for yourself.
But so today, they're now claiming back because
of that case that he is not just
a human trafficker, but he's abused women. And
I mean, are they just like, I'll go
through it? They threw all this out
and just in in
every single way they've already done
The ways they came out and said, and
not just Don Garcia, but countless other people.
The the claims of people being gang members
from Venezuela or gang members from El Salvador
and showing that most of them were not.
They keep lying, and they know they're lying.
Also, this was the point from before about
the coercion.
Bondi engaging in concerted effort to compel the
attorneys at the DOJ to violate their ethical
obligations.
The simple point was Garcia was one of
these examples.
I'm just trying
to get to the the crux of the
point. Now it says the most alarming example
of such conduct involved the high profile high
profile cases of of, Gregor Garcia.
And it says
one of these DOJ lawyers, he was then
the acting deputy director
of the office in of immigration, appeared at
the,
April 4 hearing and told the judge, we
concede the facts regarding a Brega Garcia's deportation.
The person, the plaintiff Garcia, should not have
been removed. There's no dispute that the order
could not be used to send him to
El Salvador.
He got removed for that.
Now these people are getting pushed out of
the way for acknowledging the facts because it's
inconvenient for the administration.
Now, again, that's not unique to left and
right, but realize that it's important today more
than ever.
Chief prosecutor resigned over Abrego Garcia's indictment, feared
case pursued for political reasons.
So he said there's many people along this
path who have been like, you guys are
lying about this and just move back. Not
and we're talking about Republicans, guys.
So here
is the article of Greg Garcia to return
to US to face charges.
This was the
It says the newly unsealed indictment charges Greg
Garcia with unlawful transportation of undocumented
aliens and a related conspiracy charge.
He stands accused of making more than a
100 trips from Texas to other parts of
the country over the course of the year
to transport migrants and exchange for payment. Okay.
So where was all this before?
You're telling me the Trump the Trump administration
in 02/2019,
the argument is it's all new information because
they finally started to look. Well, why didn't
you look before?
Why didn't you have an interest in caring
about this possible investigation back in the time
it happened? Right? So now what they're claiming
is because of this, they got to look
back into it. It it just all seems
wildly contrived.
And with a person that you were refusing
to bring back in the place, now you're
bringing him back because you claim you found
new information. The idea that you would have
brought him back because you had evidence is
a lie. You already made it clear that
wasn't the case. Or, yeah, in fact, you
argued you did have all the evidence, but
you weren't gonna bring him back. Now Bondi's
claiming because they have evidence, that's why they
brought him back.
Mean, doesn't this feel very much like the
way Israel conducted propaganda?
I just I I I think that's important
overlap, whether there's a connection or not. It's
just this lie and lie just, oh, you
don't like that one? How about this lie?
Oh, you know, just lying next to the
next narrative, the next lie rather that continues
the
whatever makes you believe in that moment, even
if it contradicts what they said before. Now
it says the investigation
stems from when the Tennessee Highway Patrol pulled
over a regular CFO in 2022 for speeding.
And the video that was the point. Just
sorry. I think
I
I hope I didn't misspeak before, but the
point was that the 2019
was that was was Home Depot.
That's when that
cop and the,
anonymous source that I don't think exists claimed
that. That went through two different deportation
hearings. They gave them the withholding of removal
in 02/2019.
Now when they pulled them over,
that's why the cop was considering what they
said. Because on that, it said, MS 13,
even though that was never verified and it
was from a cop that was fired.
So think about that. So that how that's
how this narrative builds into 2022. I'll show
you the clip of the cop saying, oh,
they think he's trafficking people. Okay. Well, the
bottom line is ended up where he gave
him a ticket, let him go.
But it says, and the video of the
incident shows the officer skeptical of a van
full of passengers, which I am too. I'll
show you why.
Doesn't mean that he's everything they claim he
is. That's why evidence matters, due process matters,
which now he's gonna get sort of retroactively
after they take all this time to manufacture
a case, which is kind of what I
think happened. The indictment alleges that Brigadier Garcia
falsely told the officer he was driving construction
workers from Saint Louis, but he was actually
on one of his trips transporting undocumented migrants
or so the US government tells you.
The government disappeared Kilmore to a foreign prison
in violation of a court order. That's true.
Now after months of delay and secrecy, they're
bringing him back not to correct their error,
but to prosecute him.
I think it's an interesting way to look
at it. Right? And these are you know,
if if they had never been forced to
bring them back, would this have ever even
happened?
Now it says, quote, this shows that they
were playing games with the court all along.
Due process means the chance to defend yourself
before you're punished,
not after.
Again, even if you're here illegally. And in
this case, he wasn't, if you remember correctly.
Once he was given the withholding of removal,
he wasn't he's technically not here legally, but
you are being granted the allowance to stay.
So you are no longer here illegally.
You see what I'm saying? Like, you're in
a limbo state, but you're not in the
country illegally ever since 02/2019,
despite how they frame this. That's true. That's
easy to prove from the Trump administration.
Says this is an abuse of power, not
justice. The government should put him on trial,
yes, but in front of the same immigration
judge who heard his case in 02/2019,
which is the ordinary manner of doing things,
to ensure that his case is handled as
it would have been had he not been
improperly sent to El Salvador as supreme court
ordered.
Bondi said Friday that after his trial and
serving his sentence if convicted. That said wait.
So she also said Friday that after his
trial and serving his sentence if convicted, Abrego
Garcia would be deported to El Salvador. You
know, I see this is so crazy that
it it says it's not clear how such
a move would be lawful
as an immigration court judge in Trump's administration.
At that time, Trump's administration
ruled
barring him from going to that country for
political persecution.
So
why then would he go back to that
country if that's, like, the one thing aside
from due process that was holding this up?
I I honestly think they're just trying to
get people outraged.
But it says the Trump administration has been
ordered by several courts to return Garcia, most
recently in a Supreme Court decision from April
saying the White House must facilitate his return.
As we remember,
for for months, the White House argued that
all that only meant supplying a plane if
the government of El Salvador wished to return
him. So you just can't look at those
arguments that pretend like what's happening now is,
like, what they wanted is Bondi's, like, desperately
trying to make it sound like this was
all we win, like, everything. Right? But it
says secretary of state Rubio was leading negotiations
of the man's return. I think that's important.
From the beginning of this, it's been felt
like Rubio was the one being framed by
Trump as in responsible for all of it.
We made that point back then. Even Rubio
tried to push it back on Trump a
little bit. But as his body said, the
case was based on recently found facts.
What is I mean, think about
that. You'd like you just drummed up some
facts all of a sudden. Where were all
these people? How did you have this on?
If you didn't do it then, how was
it happening now?
Seems very dishonest to me. It says Friday's
court filings make numerous references to Garcia's alleged
membership of MS thirteen. So they're still pushing
that.
They I mean, look. They had their opportunity
to make this case, and they were unable
to present the evidence.
Now maybe they make up something today, which
they're already doing. But think about that, saying
he's
also often accompanied by members of the gang.
So they're still pushing this argument. Now let
me ask you something. If there is new
evidence that comes out and makes that case,
does that change the fact they illegally deported
him without due process? No. It does not.
Think that's the only point you understand. But
it matters that these things are shown to
be factual because I think they're trying to
big dig themselves out of a hole.
But but, like, if so, if they have
a source that comes up and says he
did all these things, should you be skeptical
of that?
Damn well right. You should be. They're right
now in a very sticky situation. And all
of a sudden, you got somebody else who
they might give a deal to who suddenly
starts saying everything they need to hear. I
don't I mean, I'm just I'm I'm not
saying that should be the assumption, but you
should definitely consider that. A review of court
records by the Hill shows accusation
the accusation is largely based on a tip
from one confidential informant.
I'll include this over here. This is the
article about that.
And you already know this. That's referring to
the same thing we're talking about.
And it says, there's a big difference between
what the state of play was before the
indictment
and after the indictment,
the recent indictment. They're just they're leveling all
this against it right now, which, by the
way, don't forget, indictment is not hard to
you don't need to indictments aren't proof.
It's an allegation. That's all it is. So
everyone on the MAGA side right now is
trying to pretend like that's proving. We knew
it. Look at this indictment. We told you
he's a criminal. It doesn't that they could
accuse you of anything.
It says, and so the reason why he's
back and was returned was because it's an
arrest warrant, which was presented to the government
in El Salvador.
I I so you're gonna pretend like you
couldn't have just had I mean, the idea
that that's the only reason it suddenly worked
out and I was totally organic, had nothing
to do with what the courts were doing
and how you were refusing to bring them
back.
Doesn't that just feel childish? Like, it's that's
the best. They really just can't be grown
up about this and be like, okay, fine.
We'll adhere to what you're asking. They can't
be a scene to be weak or not
winning.
Somehow, this was just how it worked out
and what we always planned, and now we're
showing you the truth. You are being forced
to bring him back because you broke the
law.
And now you've seemingly thrown together some patched
together case and acting like that's why we
now so you're telling me that Salvador Buquele
wouldn't have given him back unless you had
a warrant? Yeah. He clearly cares about the
law of a foreign country, right? It's just
so stupid. It says, so there's a big
difference there as far as whether it makes
the ongoing litigation of Maryland moot.
It says, as I repeatedly said, there is
this is not about the man. It's about
his constitutional
rights,
and that's then the rights of all. I
agree completely with that. The administration will now
have to make its case in a court
of law as it should have all along.
Right? That's the only point. Right? So it's
it's when it comes to the main crux
of the point, we're being vindicated
because now they're being proven to have had
to do that, which we all really knew.
So, the argument is now kind of, as
it was in the beginning, been pushed over
into
you're trying to claim he's not a gang
member. No, I mean, I care about the
facts. And if you're lying about them and
we can prove that, that matters to me.
But the only point in this is whether
or not he was sent to the wrong
place and given due process. That's it. And
we're right, as you probably can see by
now.
Daily Mail, Trump says choice to bring deported
Maryland man, Kilmer Garcia. I know it's so
funny they keep doing that. He is from
Maryland.
He didn't was born there. He's lived there
for a really long time. You know, it's
this game you play where because somehow, you
know, it's like it just it's again, if
if the Trump administration gave him the legal
right to stay here, doesn't that mean that
he's you know, your guy did that. It's
just so it's so funny that he says
wasn't my decision.
So Rubio being said as the lead guy
in regard to this negotiation and then claiming
what so somehow the president, you want the
you have the mandate and he could do
whatever he wants, but somehow wasn't able to
dictate this.
No, that's him just passing the buck is
what it is. That's a bad leader.
Good leaders do not blame their underlings for
choices that were made, whether or not they
were involved. You're the leader, you take it.
But he said Donald Trump told NBC that
it was the decision of the Department of
Justice to return him, who had been wrongfully
deported. He says, well, that wasn't my decision.
The Department of Justice decided to do it
that way. Oh, really? Like you couldn't be
like, no,
I'm in charge? It's just so silly.
And it says he's trying to defend a
man who's got a horrible record of abuse,
abuse of women in particular. No. He's a
total loser, this guy, Trump said.
Now see, now the allegation of abusing women,
not proven in a court of law, has
now become the absolute fact. Like trafficking, like
MS 13, like everything else, they have yet
to actually prove. That's how this works. It's
this is the court of public opinion. That's
how they operate.
So let's look at
the indictment real quickly. You can read through
it. There's 10 pages. But I wanna make
something really clear to you.
That again, the point about what this is
an indictment is an allegation, guys. Now, yes,
they have to construct some level level of
evidence, but it's not proof
despite what some screamers online would want you
to believe. But if you read through this,
everything until this last part
is just narrative.
Alright. So from 2016
through 02/2025, Kilmore and others are known by
the grand jury to conspire to bring undocumented
aliens in the country. So people read that
who don't know any better and think, oh
my god. This court document there I knew
it, and that that's just the government saying
that. That's all that means. And so you
can read through the whole thing. It's all
their claims about trafficking, about everything. So when
you get to the actual meat of what
they're claiming, they can prove it with is
right here.
Okay. So it says everything else is just
the narrative. Now it says
on or about the following dates,
the manner of means of conspiracy, Kilmer,
Garcia, and his coconspirators took the case to
the following actions. Now the argument is one,
that he had people in the car with
him that he was trafficking, and two, that
there are coconspirators
that he works with for a trafficking network,
all of which is certainly possible.
I I'm I'm I that's my point is
that we have to wait for the actual
due process, you know, the introduction of evidence
and the court that exactly.
Then we'll know.
And so by doing all of this, they're
simply proving that we were right, Right? That
this is what should have happened And had
they done it we wouldn't be here.
Oh, I guess, other than the going to
El Salvador. But the bottom line is this
is the real point.
And so what they're saying is that it's
a bigger story now with coconspirators, and we
have to wait for the evidence to be
presented. And if it does and he's guilty,
well, then that the week talk about it.
But what's interesting is how obvious it is
that they violated this in the place.
But you can see it goes through and
says when asked where they were traveling from,
he knowingly fall falsely told them they were
coming for Saint Louis. Now this is just
the go I'm gonna play these clips for
you. So I'm just brushing through it. This
is this is the case of him being
pulled over.
Multiple passengers were going to the same address.
Now I think look. The claim is that
he's bringing them to work for construction.
Now someone who works in I'd worked in
kitchens, and I've worked with a lot of
people in in the, you know, in the
kitchen, in the dish room that were people
that were illegal aliens or people that were,
you know, immigrants.
It's very common for them to try to
get their friends jobs and so on. And
so just like, if let's just even say
they were all illegal aliens in the car.
That doesn't prove that he's somehow trafficking people.
What it seems to suggest, unless he's lying
about it, which is certainly possible, is that
he was bringing them over because he was
gonna get them jobs with somebody that he
worked with. And that's why they put him
as their address because they're going there with
them. Like, it that or he could be
doing something illegal. That's what we'll find out
in the case. But what's interesting is that
it's not as clear cut as people online
trying to make it just like the last
time. And and what I can't see in
here at all is any indication that he's
provably part of m f thirteen. That seems
to be kind of being left out there
as if they've already proven that.
But you can read through it. I mean,
it's all it's all very contrived in my
opinion, and it's basically using that one stop
to make all this case. The one stop
that Trump's last administration
ignored and gave him a right to stay
here. I just really love for you to
make sense of that for me. So either
they made the mistake last time and they're
responsible for allowing him to stay here, which
then in some ways makes them responsible for
what might have happened or happened,
or they're lying about it now.
So here's there's I'm gonna play this video.
Here's the part of it because it gets
cut off by Fox News. But this is,
RT. And here's what's interesting, by the way.
This is on the sixth. Right? So they
report to you
that he's gonna return to the country,
and that same day,
he returns to the country. So I guess
certainly possible they he was already on the
way before they said that. But to me,
it gives the impression of how easy it
is to bring him back.
All this fighting was because they needed to
construct the case, so they had their weapons
and ammunition ready to, you know, claim that
they did know he was a criminal even
though they just constructed it now based on
new evidence, they say. I mean, the fact
that she said that's going to bite them.
Watch. Because if it's all new evidence, then
what did you use to deport it the
time? You see my point? But either way,
how rapidly this happened shows you that they
just were dragging their feet for obvious reasons.
So there's watch this part. We're here today
to announce a major update in an important
case.
Abrego Garcia has landed in The United States
to face justice.
On May 21, a grand jury in the
Middle District Of Tennessee
returned a sealed indictment,
charging Abrego Garcia
with alien smuggling and conspiracy
to commit alien smuggling
in violence. So not human trafficking then, despite
keeping saying that even though it's very similar.
Right? Or the idea A grand jury in
the Middle District Of has landed in The
United States to face justice.
Right. So justice.
Right. So why just send him away
then? Right? He had this idea that you
somehow had this MS thirteen gang kingpin leader
who you told us was a leader. Remember
that? And you also told us that he
was a human trafficking monster, that he was
hurt. Okay. You said all of that really
forcefully, and then you sent him
away. Why? If the justice was so necessary.
You see my point? Like, this doesn't add
up. If you're honest, you know that this
is just the narrative they're putting out, and
it needs to scream dishonesty because of how
long this took. If it was about justice,
this would not be the way it went.
And, of course, it's a sealed indictment. Of
course, it's not gonna be something we can
all see despite the I mean, I get
the sense there's there's no way this doesn't
find its way out. Somebody's gonna make this
clear, but I I'm worried they're gonna do
this behind closed doors for obvious
reasons. On May 21, a grand jury in
the Middle District Of Tennessee
returned a sealed indictment,
charging Abrego Garcia
with alien smuggling and conspiracy to commit alien
smuggling
in violation of title eight USC thirteen twenty
four. Not that he's guilty of it, not
that we know anything, but that's what they're
being charged with. That's it.
We want to thank president Bukele
for agreeing to return Abrego Garcia to The
United States.
Our government presented El Salvador with an arrest
warrant,
and they agreed to return him to our
country. None of which is necessary, by the
way, as even the courts ruled and everybody
could functionally see they were
functionally in control of him the entire time.
That's what the courts ruled. That's what the
evidence shows. So again, it's all just the
construct they're giving you to try to make
it look like they didn't just lose, which
is what happened.
General Pam Bondi on these latest charges for
Kilmar Abrego Garcinia. Smuggling
and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling
in violation of title eight USC thirteen twenty
four.
We want to thank president Bukele
for agreeing to return Abrego Garcia to The
United States.
Our government presented El Salvador with an arrest
warrant, and they agreed to return him to
our country.
We're grateful to president Bukele for agreeing to
return him to our country to face these
very serious charges.
This is what American justice looks like.
Where do you get off saying that?
You see what I'm saying? Like, what are
you talking about? Like, so you try you
went out of your way to try to
get this guy somewhere. And now now because
you're forced to bring him back and you
patched together this case, this is what justice
looks like? This this is my point about
team sport politics.
If you're if you're a a child could
see how that's you trying to paint a
picture that's not embarrassing,
but yet they're all they're cheerleading. All the
Johnsons and all the cats are all out
there going, we did it. This is the
best ever. We're winnings. Every single time everything
happens, and it's just so frustrating. It's embarrassing.
Anyway
Upon completion of his sentence, we anticipate
he will be returned
to his home country of El Salvador.
So I think that's wild. I mean I
mean, how do you even gonna say that?
Like, the whole premise of, like, from the
legal perspective
outside of the due process, which is gonna
be addressed going back, was that he got
sent somewhere that the court said he couldn't.
That that the Trump administration
got the withholding removed for him back in
02/2019, and you're gonna send him there now
anyway? Like, just because he gets if and
when he gets convicted of a crime, he
still can't go back to El Salvador because
that it's just so funny how they, I
think, are constantly trying to poke it in
the eye. Like, I think they need to
try to paint themselves as not following along,
like they're, you know, like they're fighting the
deep state kind of thing. It's just it's
just lazy.
The grand jury found that over the past
nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant
role in an alien
smuggling
ring.
I'm interested to see how they try to
patch that together.
Right? So if you've got one incident,
at least as far as we could tell,
we'll see what comes out in this because
maybe there's more. I don't know. See, I'm
not gonna assume that. I'm not like the
partisans. I'm not gonna lurch into what I
believe and yell that's the fact. The point
is we very, very well could be.
But it's from what we know, they've got
one end one incident that was was let
off with a traffic ticket, or rather wasn't
even that. I think it was a, like
a fix it kind of a thing. I'll
show you in a The bottom line, though,
back to this,
is what else is I mean, where where
are you building
into a conspiracy
of continual effort?
I mean, if this is based on one
person or even a few, it's saying that
that's what happened and there's nothing else to
back it up. Is that gonna hold up?
I shouldn't.
They found this was his full time job,
not a contractor.
He was a smuggler of humans and children
and women. So you see where this goes?
You can't see this is what's so this
is what makes her bad at her job,
and I think why she's out of her
depth. You don't give somebody an ally. You
don't say we're charging you with this and
then say he did these things. He is
that, and he's guilty.
That's not what that says. That says you're
charging him, and you're gonna find out what
through the investigation.
Those are the allegations.
But you see, already in the minds of
people on the Twitter verse, they're saying that's
the case. Just like they said, he's a
gang member. Just like they said, he's a
trafficker before anything had ever been produced. It's
all based on the court of public opinion
and emotional partisan arguments from very obvious liars
who are bad at it.
But just recognize that This is an indictment.
This is a charge, and she's saying it
as absolute fact. That's how it works.
He made over a 100
trips, the grand jury found,
smuggling people throughout our country.
MS thirteen members,
violent gang terrorist organization members
throughout our country.
They're very certain about it. Very strong
or not. But the point is you could
obviously argue
the possibility of the fact that he's bringing
people to work there. I don't know. But
you know as well as I how easy
it is for her to just scream all
dangerous MS thirteen members. You know, like, all
the dangerous ones that went over to El
Salvador? No. Because 75% of the ones she
told you were the worst of the worst
were innocent people with no criminal record who
were not here illegally. The most provable part
of the conversation, you could prove it.
And she said they were all evil criminals.
So that needs to weigh on your mind.
If she's saying that and she lied,
either she was lied to and didn't care
to look,
or she knows she was lying. So now
she could be doing both of those things
or not. We'll find out.
Thousands
of illegal aliens were smuggled.
Allegedly.
This is especially
disturbing
because Abrego Garcia is also alleged with transporting
minor children.
Wow. Wow. So now we're bringing into pedophilia
now.
Child trafficking.
Allegations, though, but watch how it quickly turns
into the fact. Defendant traded the innocence of
minor children
for profit.
See? There are even more disturbing facts. I
mean, she just said alleged and then made
a fact statement after that. This person's out
of her depth. That the grand jury uncovered.
It is alleged this defendant is part of
the same smuggling ring responsible for the death
of more than 50 migrants in 2021
Wow. After the tractor trailer overturned in Mexico.
In Mexico?
Stuff she's lobbing out doesn't even come to
pass in the court of law, just like
it didn't last time. They make all these
grandiose claims, and then when they go to
court, they focus on they don't present the
evidence.
But, see, that's not they're trying to convince
the random followers out there, not the court
of law. I don't think they care, frankly.
I think they already know that they're up
uphill battle here, but they're trying to generate
screaming people. You know? You know what? This
you know? Here's what's so funny. Tom Holland's
out here screaming about ICE and people that
have we have a right to know. And
then you've got these people out here radicalizing
people against active of Democrat judges and talking
about where they live in their names. That's
happening.
Funny how that doesn't matter. Both of them
matter in the case that rather all doxing
matters in actual doxing, not government officials.
The point is you know who a judge
is. They're
getting people to actually go after them personally
as opposed to, we wanna know who the
name is of this cop who's arresting somebody
illegally.
How dare you dox in a government? That's
that's what's happening
everywhere.
This is part of that same ring.
The defendant abused undocumented
alien females according to coconspirators
Wow. Who were under his control
while transporting them throughout our country.
Alright. So based on the people that they're
dealing with, they claim he did all these
things. I just, you know, I just don't
feel like we should be giving it that
much weight how when these people have been
proven to be liars. And when I don't
mean liars, I wanna be clear. I don't
mean just that they lie about things. We've
seen them, as Meldich has pointed out many
times, like,
patching together, like, building from whole cloth narratives
to, like, cover up what they did. I
mean, like, that we can literally prove that
Bondi and others knew what they were doing,
that they were blatantly lying for around people's
lives. No one was even worse.
Just think about that and wonder whether they
would I mean, I'm only I I've I'm
gonna hold. Up. When this gets to actual
place where we can see some facts,
it'll be a lot to talk about.
And I mean, look, I I I have
a really strong feeling that this is either
gonna be nothing. Like, they literally don't have
any of this stuff or that it ends
up being produced to show you flimsy hearsay
secondary arguments that hopefully won't hold up in
court for anybody. Not just this person, but
anybody being leveled from governments with allegations they
can't back up and shouldn't hold up in
court. But that's what I think is gonna
happen. We'll see what happens.
This defendant trafficked
firearms and narcotics
throughout our country
on multiple occasions. Oh, you forgot about that.
Using
vehicles,
SUVs
with added seats in the back, floors that
had been ripped out,
guns, narcotics,
children,
women,
MS thirteen
members.
That is what So the question is, is
she now talking about the people that she's
talk working with? Did they do all those
things? And then by virtue of being alleged
to be part of it, he is guilty
too? Or are you literally claiming Garcia did
all these things?
If that's the case, how in the world
do you have evidence for all of this?
From 02/2019, like, you're talking about so, oh,
at least from there forward, you're telling me
these guys produced you a hand like, a
file that proved all this? How does that
make sense? Were they taking pictures?
I'm telling you guys, something about this just
does not feel right to me, obviously. That
the grand jury
found.
A coconspirator
alleged that the defendant solicited nude photographs and
videos of a minor.
A coconspirator
also alleged Small to the black. Played a
role in the murder of a rival gang
member's mother.
These facts demonstrate Abrego Garcia is a danger
to our community.
Wow.
We want to thank the Department of Homeland
Security,
the FBI,
our state and local partners,
our acting US attorney Robert Maguire,
and prosecutors
from the joint task force
Vulcan.
Questions?
Attorney general.
The
the traffic stop that we've seen video of,
from Tennessee where, Alfredo Garcia was, was identified
by the local authorities.
At the time, the Homeland Security Department declined
to take custody of him. What has happened
in between that time and in between,
the time that the government has been arguing
that he was not,
returnable from El Salvador? What has happened since,
in this investigation that brought you here? Yes.
He the question was in 2021,
there was the traffic stop.
And what has changed since then? What has
changed is Donald Trump is now president of
The United States, and our borders are again
secure.
You see how stupid that is? Seeing as
how in 02/2019
is when Donald Trump's administration gave him a
withholding of removal.
2019.
That's when they claimed the evidence about being
a gang member.
Don't forget. I mean, it's just it's insulting
to your intelligence to pretend like this is
only Biden. It's only them. But you see
again, it adds to
the people who only wanna see the boogeyman
in a d, only wanna go after, you
know, the one side of the paradigm.
And thanks to the bright light that has
been shined on Abrego Garcia,
this investigation
continued with actually amazing
police work.
You mean post 2025?
It doesn't seem very honest if it continued
only after it was in your interest to
to manufacture a case that made you not
guilty anymore, which I find hard to believe
is even the case. And we were able
to track
this case and stop this
international
smuggling
ring
from
continuing. You could just see that she's trying
so hard to push this out the boundaries.
Like, this is all based on allegations.
All she's screaming, but that now it's become
an international trafficking ring. It certainly could be,
but this is not what you do when
you're laying out a cake. This is what
you do after you've you've put someone behind
bars. These are recently found facts. Right? These
Yes. Okay. Recently found facts.
To that point, can you just explain when
this investigation was opened? Yeah. Investigation in Tennessee.
Can you say when that investigation was opened?
Well, the grand jury indicted on May
21.
This investigation has been ongoing.
The it has been heavily debated here in
Washington.
In your mind, does this resolve
that issue in terms of his deportation?
And should this be seen in any way
as compliant with the judge's order to return
him to The US and the Supreme Court
ruling that the US government should facilitate future?
Of course not.
There's a
big difference between,
what the state of play was before the
indictment and after the indictment. And so the
reason why he
is back and was returned
was because it's an arrest warrant. Of course.
Of course. We we we have it's nothing
to do with the Supreme Court. We don't
care what they have to say. We did
it because we suddenly discovered something and now
we want him back because because justice.
Does anybody believe that? Do Republicans believe that?
With everything they've said, he'll never do you
realize on May post May 21 is when
she said the indictment was leveled. They were
saying he'd never come back.
Right?
So so were they were they lying to
you then?
This is my point, guys. It's so easy
to see through lies like this because they're
being clumsy about it. They're making this up.
Now I I can't say every part of
it. I do kinda feel that, But you
can clearly see that they're mat they're kind
of building this in a way to make
it seem like they were never gonna bring
him back until this epiphany occurred, and now
we're doing what we think is right.
When reality, they failed.
Right? They tried to get this guy out
of the way. They were forced to bring
him back or they told you they wouldn't,
and now it's being forced to happen. And
they knew when it does happen that they'd
have to then prove their claims. So they
drag their feet until they could put this
together. Maybe it's real.
But with all that knowing that which is
the case, it's highly likely that they fudged
it or lied about it entirely. Which was
presented to the government in in El Salvador.
So so there's a there's a big difference
there. As far as whether it makes the
ongoing
litigation in in Maryland,
moot,
I would think so, but but we don't
know about this. You know, he just landed
today.
Jake, CBS. I just wanna confirm what you
said earlier that you're intending to prosecute him
and keep him in an American prison if
he's found guilty and then would remove him
after his sentence is over. Correct. Yes. He
will be prosecuted in our country, sentenced in
our country if convicted,
and then returned
after completion of his sentence. Now you wanna
explain why that makes sense?
Why go through the process of convicting convicting
him of a crime if you're gonna deport
him to another place where that doesn't mean
anything anymore?
See, this is the same point. They're just
this is clumsy,
and you can see right through it if
you're just not lying to yourself. Okay. They
here's what's funny. They just made the exact
opposite argument with the person that was supposed
to be a criminal and or was an
m s three m s thirteen leader. Remember?
Where they dropped the they were gonna go
after him because he was a criminal. We
want him to go to prison, and then
they dropped the case, and they sent him
over to El Salvador. And this is a
guy that Bucheli is accused of working with.
They're just it's they're such hypocrites around this.
The bottom line is if you try
to
go through this process and present the evidence
and
charge him with the crime, found him guilty
of a crime, if you then send him
to El Salvador, that was all meaningless.
There's no meaning for that because that's not
gonna hold up in El Salvador. He's gonna
go to El Salvador in a place where
the criminals can easily maneuver around the government.
They work with the government. That's been proven
many times over. Even the US government called
it out before this.
So just think about that. That is absurdly
obvious.
They're doing this to go through the motions
to make it look like this. I think
they've patched this together to make this argument,
to make it appear that way, to then
send it back to the same place they
did, which will still be a violation of
the same Supreme Court ruling.
That I it's it's obvious what's happening, I
think. You have any evidence?
Hold on. That was accidental. Come back to
that. Sadie, Upholstery Journal. Okay.
At two. I've one's on top of one's
on top of. Maybe I misunderstood you, but,
you were mentioning, you know, that he would
had some involvement in these in a murder,
you know, or what was connected to groups
that had, you know, involved with this other
smuggling ring.
But to be clear, the only charges he's
facing right now are the,
like, you know, human smuggling charges. Just the
this the, that's the one offense. But the
other things that you have talked about are
not actually in the, indictment.
No. Coconspirators
alleged that. Even though she said, that's why
I made the point, very clearly that he
did those things
over and over, which are clips you already
see circulating on Twitter right now, where Barney
says he did this and he's that,
even though you just he just made the
case for me. And we were clear to
say that he is charged with
it's not only very serious charges of alien
smuggling.
And, again, there were children
involved in that. You know, human trafficking k.
But she she just did it again. You
just you can't keep conflating what is alleged
that you're not charging him with in even
the indictment
with what you keep pretending is the absolute
fact. The indictment is clear. It's only about
the smuggling overlap. That does not make any
allegations that she just laid out other than
that. Like, that's why the lady asked the
question. Let me get this straight. You just
laid out a whole bunch of bombastic claims,
and the only thing you're charging him with
was this one thing. That's exactly what they
did
MS 13 gang member, and then it became
all sorts of other things. Terror was rapist,
a murderer, gang member. They said all of
them.
And human trafficking was the one they laid
on top of it. They've now, I guess,
feel they've patched together enough to make it
actually happen.
But they didn't prove it then. And the
only thing they charged him with was, or
rather, alleged was being a gang member in
in regard to what they had to present
to the Supreme Court after the fact.
It's it's just they're they're stumbling through this
whole thing in very obvious way. Not only
in our country, but in our world
is very no. Co conspirators
alleged that, and we were clear to say
that he is charged with
it's not only very serious
charges of alien smuggling.
And again, there were children
involved in that. You know, human trafficking, not
only in our country, but in our world
is
very, very real. Oh, oh, well, thank you
for that. We because important we need to
know that, you know, that that's like talking
about whether this guy's guilty of a murder
and then going, but murder is so bad.
Murder's everywhere. It's all murders all over the
place. What is that? That that is not
relevant. You're trying to do that to build
the feeling of why this is so important.
Again, I she's very bad at this. It's
very dangerous.
And as you saw recently in Virginia Human
trafficking is dangerous. Glad glad we're glad we're
clear about that. The arrest we made of
the MS thirteen member unrelated to this,
we learned at that press conference,
that's where they bring young children Okay. So
she's about to lurch into some argument about
other MS thirteen gang members for a person
that has never yet been proven to be
a MS thirteen gang member.
Why do you think that's relevant? Because people
are gonna go, oh, that's what he's doing.
Oh, it's so bad. Has nothing to do
with him, at least not provably at this
point. That's why she's doing that. Into our
country and they start grooming them at middle
school age
to become
MS thirteen full fledged members,
commit violent crimes throughout our country. It is
highly organized. It is very dangerous,
and they are living throughout our country. Okay.
That doesn't that's no bearing on the question
she asked you, which is basically why only
one thing when you have all these other
allegations, and then she just spins out into
more allegations and more broad statement. But no
more because they are being arrested,
they are being prosecuted,
and being convicted,
and deported when appropriate.
Great. And so you're supposed to pretend that
that that's happening. Therefore, when I deport somebody,
that's who they are.
Just keep thinking that. Can I just That's
all for today? You guys are Thank you.
Appreciate it. Right. No more questions because I'm
clearly getting seen for what I am.
Well, here
is the overlapping point of Bukele saying that,
what, am I gonna just bring him back?
I can't just smuggle him into the country.
So it just shows you how silly it
all is. Can
president Bukele weigh in on this? Do you
plan to return him? Well, I can't I'm
supposed to have been suggesting that I smuggle
a terrorist into The United States. Right? They
told me how How can I smuggle?
How can I return him to their letters?
It's like I smuggle Okay. So was he
not already being accused of crimes?
What's the only what's the difference here? Are
you seeing what I'm saying? Like, it what
so so it's supposed to matter to the
president of El Salvador that The US Government
has a legal document?
Why does that make any sense to anybody?
It's just so stupid and obvious, and this
is the best they can conjure. Like, it's
just so flimsy.
The bottom line is you'd know and and
and the court already proved that Trump was
the US government was functionally in control the
whole time. We all know that. This is
all a very clumsy patch together to make
it appear as if they aren't the ones
that just had to bow to what the
Supreme Court was demanding.
And it's it's as simple as that. That's
that's just hubris right there, guys. That's all
it is.
Now here he is after he's been released.
Bukele speaks up after Garcia has been sent
back. And he says, as I said in
the Oval Office, I would never smuggle a
terrorist in The United States, still calling him
a terrorist now.
Like, have you improved when he's part of
the gang, but that terrorist has been the
allegation they've run with because they're passing together
an area. I would never release a gang
member into the streets of El Salvador, except
the ones you make deals with and do
that though, right?
These people are all doing the same thing.
I'll include this for you because it's important.
Secret Bukele deal lies behind Trump's El Salvador
deportations.
There's a lot of evidence in here, guys.
It's very easy to
see. And he goes, that said, we work
with the Trump administration. And he he did
that because now he has been brought back,
you see. So he says, that said, we
work with Trump administration. And if they request
the return of a gang member to face
charges, we wouldn't refuse that.
So I don't think you realize how stupid
that sounds. So nobody asked you to smuggle
anything. They were saying the court ruled he
had to facilitate the return. So
they were making fun of the fact that
you were acting like we can't just smuggle
him. Well, Trump could say I want him
because the court said that's it. So the
only difference is you're claiming he has charges.
That's it. Does anybody buy that?
But he goes no more margaritas under custody.
You made those fake cups you set down
that everyone exposed because you set that Photoshop
up. He even claimed that.
Just so it's so obvious, guys. I mean,
does anybody buy this stuff anymore? I mean,
am I just preaching to the choir out
there?
Here's what Pam Bondi had to say. Maybe
I misunderstood. Pam Bondi dodges his reports. Actually,
this is sort of redundant. I'll probably go
over it in the future. I've I've already
gone. Not that it matters, but I'm going
well past the time I was supposed to
be done.
But the bottom line is it's obvious to
me and people that are paying attention, I
think, that they're trying to kind of sidestep
a lot of this because I feel like
it's obvious.
But DC Draino comes out, like I told
you, and says, democrats fought like hell. They
bring back MS 13 Maryland dad back to
America. Well, a lot of other people fought
not to bring him home, but to make
sure the government cares about the constitution. Apparently,
you don't care about the constitution. That's okay.
He says, well, now they got their wish.
One small issue,
he's been indicted for human trafficking. Do you
know what indictment is, bud? I don't think
you do, especially as you're waiting around your
phase one Epstein binder while you're still promoting
the fact that there are the people trying
to hide that from you. The point is
clearly it's an allegation.
So it doesn't vindicate your claim here, man.
And he goes, be careful what you wish
for. The government can accuse people of anything.
In fact, they accused you guys of being
antisemites and terrorists
back when you were wearing red hats, and
it was on either side of the pyramid.
The point is they can accuse you of
damn near anything.
But to him, that means it's proven, or
at least he's framing it that way for
people out there that don't know any better,
playing on the lowest common denominator.
Now DHS has released the investigative report. This
is back from April,
and it's very clear what this stuff shows
you. I've already gone over all of this.
This is the crux of their argument, guys.
So you can see for yourself.
This is
the investigative unit on 12/01/2022.
Now she said 2021, by the way, just
showing you how flip frivolous they are. That
was Bondi claiming it was 2021, it was
2022.
Received information that he Garcia was queried by
Tennessee Highway Patrol.
It says, the source indicate that Abrego was
identified through official law enforcement investigations as MS
13. Now we've talked about this. That right
there, as even Zenis in the recent court
ruling made clear,
that was only regarding
what the cop who was later fired for
corruption was alleging from one and on the
source. That is not proof of anything. That
had cascaded through these documents, through deportation discussions.
That's why these people, when pulled them over,
had that because that came up.
Of course, when there was no actual meat,
they let him go with a traffic ticket.
Well, so they point to that. That's all
they have. And it says he was suspected
of labor human trafficking. They realized labor and
human draft was very different. I mean, it's
a large category. But when you say human
trafficking, people always assume in a sexual context.
When you're talking about labor trafficking, we're talking
about people being moved, you know, who are
legal aliens regarding working certain places, which is
fine with the law. It still matters. The
point, though, is it's a very big difference
in the way they frame that. So that's
why they've said
migrant smuggling or whatever the way they frame
that. Message on the first December, subject was
observed speeding,
unable to maintain the lane, and subsequently pulled
over.
Upon approach, I can just play the clip
for you right now. The point is there
was eight people in the car identified
who,
it was subject being the driver being him.
Sub subject stated he was driving three days
ago from Houston to Texas.
There was no luggage in the vehicles leading
the counter officers to suspect human trafficking incident.
Certainly possible. All the passengers gave the same
home address. That's my point from before. Is
that if he was bringing them to work,
which is what he claimed, that wouldn't be
that far fetched. But since during the interview,
subject pretended to speak less English than he
was capable of, which certainly could be the
case. Frankly, I think that's all that happens
often with this situation, whether or not they're
truly committing a crime, and attempted to put
the encountering office off track by responding with
questions or that's just the reality of it.
When asked I mean, my point is I'm
showing you how flimsy this is. That's this
is what they've got. When asked what the
relationship he had, he registered owner of the
vehicle. He said he replied the owner of
the vehicle was his boss. Right? So he's
bringing people there was the point, and that
his work is construction, which is true.
Encountering officer decided not to cite the subject
for driving infractions, but gave him a warning
citation
for driving with an expired license.
That's what happened.
Encountering office officer gathered names of the other
occupants of the vehicle.
Basically, couldn't read some of them, didn't pursue
it further.
As a result, he did not pass the
names
on. No incident report. So they don't even
have the names of who they were with,
apparently. And yet somehow they patched this altogether.
Doesn't seem like that makes sense to me.
But, again, I'm not gonna we'll wait to
see what actually happens.
So that's about the traffic stop. So you
realize when they say, it said MS 13,
that's what they're pointing to, things like this,
or the deportation
documents that aren't proof of anything
that are based on one person who was
later fired for corruption that they point to.
Three documents say MS 13. That's what they
do. They misrepresent the reality, and they know
they're lying to you guys. They very much
know that. So this goes over both these
documents about
that's the same one. That's the same document.
And this is just simply outlining this from
Homeland Security. And it's all the same information.
That's it's very short. That's all it is.
So here, I'll just play this clip. This
is,
Red Circus shared this, and there's two parts
to it. I'll show you both these, and
I'll make the point for what and Woke
has shared.
To a twenty twenty two traffic stop in
Tennessee
where the Department of Homeland Security said Abrego
Garcia was pulled over with a vehicle full
of passengers who all gave his home address
as their own. The Trump administration has admitted
his deportation to El Salvador was what they
called an administrative error, but had refused to
facilitate his return despite a Supreme Court ruling.
Let's get right to ABC's Catherine Faulders who
has this exclusive reporting. So, Catherine, what do
we know so far?
So, Diane, what we know is that Kilmar
Abrego Garcia is back on his way from
El Salvador to The United States. He's flying
here and should land late this afternoon in
The United States. Now we're told by sources
that he's on his way back
because he is facing criminal charges. He has
been indicted by a federal grand jury, an
indictment that remains under seal on trap on
charges related,
to human trafficking. So once in The United
States, he will face federal criminal charges for
allegedly transporting undocumented migrants within The United States.
And as you mentioned, that stems from what
we've reported on previously, that 2022
Tennessee Highway Patrol traffic stop where Abrego Garcia
was pulled over for speeding. He was in
that car with eight other people who he
was transporting. He was originally,
let go with a warning by the sheriffs,
but those sheriffs were speculating off camera that
that could be related to potentially
transporting
undocumented migrants. Now it's Yeah. See, evidence is
what matters there, though. Right?
People
thinking it might be the case is not
usually carried forward
six years later and reinvestigated
and laid out with new mortons. You know?
Just think about how wildly unprecedented this is.
Important to note here that this investigation, these
federal charges
did not really get put into motion until
April. That was weeks
after he was deported and after the government
admitted that he was mistakenly deported. So this
federal investigation started when he was already in
El Salvador. Of course, this is a mechanism
to bring him back to the As well,
the right as April, she said, rightly so,
is they were still going, he'll never come
back even as they were packing together a
case for that very purpose.
Just it shows you how dishonest this is.
Now this is a clip that shows you
the actual it's cut down on on purpose,
and Wokeness says, Greg Garcia was busted driving
eight men without any IDs across the country
for a confirmed
illegal human smuggler.
Confirm see how dumb this gets? How this
gets cascaded out into allegation becomes fact, becomes
partisan concepts. He says he's hauling them for
money.
There goes the narrative.
See, and people buy this stuff because end
wokeness has
3,000,000 followers, and that's all they and this
gets circulated out, and this is how the
game goes. Here's the clip. How dark are
your windows?
How dark is the back windows?
The back
window?
Standby.
How dark are they? The the colors.
Yeah.
From from Texas, it's it's wood.
How many how many rows have you got
in here? Four? Where? Four seats. Four rows
of seats? Yeah. Three three seats.
Yeah. With with with with him. Yeah. See,
I mean, you could choose I mean, look.
There's plenty of reason to be suspicious here.
But you could choose to make this into
what you want it to be, or you
can consider
the the alternative possibility that he is bringing
people, maybe even illegal aliens. That's certainly possible,
and you could call that smuggling,
but to work for somebody. And they work
all I mean, do you realize that Trump
already said he would give a pass to
certain restaurant workers and certain farm workers if
they said that So you you can't start
splitting hairs about which illegal immigrants you think
are okay because of your political standing. The
bottom line is they might be going to
work with the person he works with. He
let him use the car. He's bringing in
there, or it's a smuggling operation. The point
is you don't know. So people like Enwilke
does the rest that are already jumping to
conclusions
just like they did last time. They're out
there doing it because that's their that's their
job.
You know, whether they choose that to be
the case or because they're driven to it,
they're out there lying for their side.
I care about the facts. Whether it means
he's a smuggling per a trafficker or whether
he's being lied about, I care about that,
and I want that to be shown to
you. I just think it's in infuriating that
we have to deal with people like this
who muddy the waters. Like, here you're holding
out there screaming about people asking for the
names of government officials and how that ruins
everything and make everyone in danger. And you
got people like this who are out here
lying about everything, who are screaming up, who
doxxing actual people.
It just it just shows you how one-sided
this all is.
Anybody doing if anyone breaking the law, it
should matter. You wanna doxing somebody, it should
matter. But, actually,
they're trying to use actual,
you know
what's the right word for it?
Just the law, the reality of it, using
that to try to hide these people behind
it is just it's just so dishonest. Did
y'all put put an extra one in? Did
y'all put another one in? No.
Did it come like this? Use the the
the the truck?
I've never I've never seen one with that
many seats in it.
What you say? It's my boss. I I
said I've never seen one with that many
sinks. Oh, really? Yeah. And he's got his
boss on the phone right there.
That's why I was asking if you could
put an extra man.
No.
Like this.
Okay.
Yeah. What you got, Rhett? This is the
only point that really matters here is that
you so this is what they then use
to assume
everything. Now, of course, it matters. The cop
is a cop. He knows what you do,
but cops are wrong all the time. They
can lie. They can be you know, it's
ultimately ended in a warning
citation.
That's what matters. You know what you got
here,
no. No. He's,
he's hauling these people for money is what
he's doing. But sometimes they commingle dope and
No.
There's eight people. Yeah. I know. I didn't
know that. Yeah. They put a extra
Okay. I mean, that should be considered like
everything else.
But since he let him go with a
with a ticket, meaning they didn't have enough
evidence to make that allegation.
Right? And then it's his boss's car, and
then he works with this guy in construction.
I mean, what are we building off of?
I mean, how do we not recognize the
the most likely possibility, even if he is
breaking the law, that this government is building
this to hide their own crimes?
I just think it's so frustrating. And, again,
if it comes to the point to where
they produce the evidence in the court of
law, then we win because that's all we
actually wanted was due process for the government
to prove the allegations
as they're just frivolously sending people to foreign
prisons without even proving who they are, which
has happened a lot. Up until now, it's
been I mean, in many cases, they've been
the courts have kinda put a stop to
the rapid escalation of it, but it's just
everywhere, guys.
I'm just hoping people can start to question
this stuff. And as a few examples on
the way out, I thought this was wild.
This this is one every day I see
something like this. ICE detained US marshal
who matched the general description of a person
of interest inside Arizona immigration court. The point
like this
and this was in the beginning of this
when they just rushed off 200 something people
without any due process.
What happens if you're a, you know, you're
a Mexican
marshal with your in board shorts, no ID,
and you're screaming, I'm a US citizen. That
didn't work for the other guys. Suddenly, you're
in El Salvador. No one's talking. I mean,
no one even cares what you have to
say because they think you're lying anyway. Obviously,
that seems so far fetched to people. It's
already happened. There's already examples of at least
two or three people that I can recall
that were sent, who were innocent, who were
here legally,
who don't have tattoos, who just got caught
up in all of it, and nobody was
there to stop it. Nobody cared.
And, yes, they have the right the people
who are on visas. There was American citizens
that were seconds away from being sent if
the court hadn't stopped them, who were later
than able to prove they were American citizens,
but what happened if they didn't stop it?
You know, this has to show you how
frivolous this is, and they're trying to patch
together this bombastic case to try to hide
everything else.
And then let's not forget Melnick or not
Melnick, but, Steven Miller. Here's Melnick pointing it
out. He simply says, your friendly reminder that
Steven Miller has been on the record as
being motivated by hate
since he was literally in high school and
that Trump himself has joked about Miller's dislike
of people who are different than him.
As it says, mister Trump may not complain
about mister Miller, but he does occasionally poke
at his obsession with immigrants.
A hostility that goes far beyond mister Trump's.
In one meeting during the twenty twenty four
campaign, mister Trump said that if it was
up to mister Miller,
there would be only 100,000,000
people in this country, and they would all
look like mister Miller
according to a person with knowledge of that
comment. Caroline Levitt, mister Trump spokesman denied the
comment. They, of course, denied the account.
I simply said, hashtag Zionism.
The reality to me,
I mean, I, he is a very clear
agent of Israel, in my opinion, acting through
the Zionist agenda and proudly pointing that out.
You can disagree with me. That's very clearly
what I think the evidence shows. For me,
the point is whether that's driving him or
not, that this is the person who's orchestrating
this entire thing, who's been caught lying, misrepresenting
entire seven to zero losing cases for the
Supreme Court as somehow winning.
He's a dishonest manipulator, and he's proudly telling
you that he hates people that don't look
like him. How does that not affect,
you know, your impression of all this?
And I'll this is just one of the
many cases. I'll include the one about the
teen, a teen that was wrongly sent to
El Salvador that, as far as I could
tell, has never come back.
The guys literally rolled up on people they
were going for,
and the other guy said, that's not the
guy. And he the the leader said, take
it anyway.
It's literally on the record.
He got taken to El Salvador. No tattoos.
No criminal record. He was here legally.
How does that even make sense to anybody?
And you can prove it. You can prove
it like a lot of cases. You know,
people are either refusing to acknowledge or look
at it because they don't want it to
be true or they just don't care. And
either way, that makes me pretty upset.
This is happening right now. We're watching this
breakdown.
If you care about these things,
fight for it, guys. Don't fight for the
per the, you know, whatever the partisan agenda
points at. Fight for what you believe in.
Stand up for your principles. There have never
been a more important time to do it
because it is literally diminishing in front of
you. For whatever the reason is, make up
your own mind about why, but acknowledge the
problem.
As they say, the step in solving any
problem is acknowledging that it exists,
seeing it and calling it out. Because until
we get there, until we can agree on
the problem, they're gonna keep dividing us, guys.
Thank you for tuning in. Please get this
out to people. If you believe in this
platform, if you appreciate the work we put
forward, the long you know, the effort it
takes to put all this together and try
to give you commentary that help people inform,
if you believe in this and you like
the work and you appreciate it, you find
value in it, show us that.
We do this for free. We put this
out for everybody.
Lot of time goes into it, and we'd
like to keep doing this. Right? We'd like
to continue to grow this platform back into
what it was before we got attacked 15
different ways after October 7.
So reach out if you'd like to support
us in other ways.
If you have an old a different, you
know, way, if you wanna work with c
Lab in some way, reach out to us.
Call the, oh, actually
yeah. I'll include it down below. I'm trying
to remember where I put that. I wanna
take time to look it up. But, you
know, call us in the office line so
I don't miss it. Reach out to us.
But if you're out there and support the
work in general and you believe in this
and you want it to keep continuing,
find a way to donate to us. On
a recurring donation will be the best, but
the bottom line is we need you to
keep going.
Thank you for being here. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.