He was the strategist for Jimmy Carter and
convinced Jimmy Carter to say, look. The Russians
are dominating,
Afghanistan
with a civilian secular government. Let's create Al
Qaeda. Let's, back Osama bin Laden and give
his supporters
weapons to begin fighting the Russians. And, we
can pull a coup d'etat there, and, the
Russians will fight back, and then we'll say
the Russians invaded. And it worked. Essentially, Al
Qaeda is a contract army, for The United
States. Any country's
economic ability to be self sufficient
means,
potential
military power. Let's do in Ukraine what, we
did in Afghanistan.
Let's, back the crazies. Well, most of them
are,
the the former, neo Nazi groups that have
been,
so prominent that fly the Nazi flag.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thursday, 06/05/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Quite the
day. A lot of interesting developments
in, you know,
personality politics,
in culture war stuff, which, you know, are
are relevant and important for plenty of reasons
because of how powerful people are. But at
the same time, there's some very, very important
stuff happening in the world like there seems
to be happening every day. When those things
all happen at once, it's an interesting time.
You know, those things can just happen organically,
but it makes you wonder, always, as we
always should. It's not crazy to always ask
the question, how is this, you know, even
organic? How is it being used? Could it
be even actually happening organically used to distract
us from something else? Those are always how
we should be that's always kind of seen
as or framed as conspiracy
theory. It's just objective. It's just asking questions
about what's possible. Now as long as you're
willing to acknowledge that that's just a simple
question, it's not proved because you think that's
more likely than it is the case, then
that is the right path to be on.
So with what's going on with Donald Trump
and Elon Musk right now,
by the way, something we've talked about coming
up to this that was one of the
most likely possibilities,
not that I knew for sure that this
would happen. You know, I could pull Alex
Jones and say, I knew it. I was
right. But what I did was simply consider
that amongst many possibilities
over weeks and months about what might come
to pass. One of them was the likelihood
that
the hubris of both these people in the
same room would cause this to happen. And
that's what appears to be going on right
now. And I only say it that way
because, you know, obviously, that's a very common
track record for Trump's, you know, inner circle,
which is just unprecedented,
really, looking back through presidencies. And I think
there's an obvious reason for that. But at
the same time,
with everything going on right now, it's worth
your consideration,
you know, just considering whether or not this
could have been orchestrated,
whether they know it or not, or with
their involvement in order to create what is
clearly happening right now. And I don't mean
just the the focal point
of, you know, just the discussion around it.
I mean the the
the deviation. So right now, there's a lot
of people that are focused on Elon Musk.
And I think in in some ways, incorrectly
so, but in some ways,
accurately in regard to how he taps into
the larger technocratic direction.
But in my my point being that there's
a lot of focal point you know, attention
that should be given to
the government at large. Let's put it that
way. And if you remove Elon from the
conversation, I get the sense a lot of
these people will be pacified by that. And
I think it's a desperate moment for the
power structure to that everyone, even the right,
is calling out what seems to be building
right now, and this might be a way
to try
to appease that
to the to the point that maybe they
would make themselves look stupid to do so.
Now all that aside,
so it's I'm not really sure where I
stand on this because I think it's I,
in a way, many ways kinda saw something
like this coming, like a lot of us
did. But we'll go into it today and
discuss what this may be and why and
and the interesting developments. It it went within
it all, sort of. I'll show you an
early just to give you a quick view
of Elon Musk saying Trump's Donald Trump's on
the Epstein list. So it's points like that
that go, okay. That's a that's not something
you float distraction here. That's a big claim
from somebody that's in his circle that now
people are gonna that's gonna add doubt to
people that trust both of them. And so
it's hard to place that. But, nonetheless, worthy
of our conversation because some two of the
most powerful people in this country, if not
the world, are suddenly hating each other, attacking
each other. And every moment, probably since I've
gone live, it continues to get worse and
continues to develop.
Now, frankly,
other aside from what this may be around
it or maybe it cascades because of this,
I find this to be probably the most
least in the least important of what we're
gonna discuss today, but you'll see why it
ties in. Now we're gonna also discuss some
alarming developments as we have been around AI
and Palantir,
the continual development of that. I think that's
probably the most obvious elephant in the room
that the all the mainstream alternative media people
out there that have been, like, tap dancing
in every other direction trying to get you
to not look at that. Clearly, still, don't
now now they're the Trump and Elon conversation,
but also how that ties in with everything
else. AI, artificial intelligence, the FDA,
COVID nineteen direction, the shots that are being
used or worked on, the genetically altered food
discussion. There's a lot of different things that
that are building
and very clearly going in the wrong direction
from most people's perspectives,
and yet this, you know, is taking a
lot of the attention away from that. And
I think that's important to consider. We're actually
gonna start today where I think is rightly
so the most important thing, which is the
genocide that's ongoing still in Gaza and the
development around what's happening for the people
for as far as I can tell, out
of the last five days, Israel has shot
people trying to get food in those ridiculous
food queues they've created for them.
So if we're gonna try to pretend like
this is somehow a random event or that
they you know, we'll go through it. And
yet four out of five days I'm I
find it hard to believe there wasn't people
shot on that day, but they we just
can't verify that. But four of these five
days since June 1, they've shot people. And
that gets barely caught noticed, discussed outside of
the independent media.
But from there, we're gonna talk about the
overlap of some building warnings that I think
tie into that same conversation of a new
09:11, which we've heard so many times.
So many times. Whitney and I talked about
this all the way back at the last
election special.
We see another bill another nine eleven like
threat building, and we don't know how to
stop it, they told you, which kinda got
turned into domestic terrorism. And now they've turned
that into an overlap of domestic terrorism and
and immigration or foreign policy. We and it's
coming together. Now all of that rationalizes
the surveillance state that continue to be built
into the AI and technocratic age. But from
that point to the threats of the new
nine eleven concern, I wanna touch on something
we discussed from Ukraine and Russia.
Another point that I think I was exactly
correct on, and I think a lot of
us were, it's not unique to me, in
regard to sensing the hype that was built
around a very important event, but, nonetheless, something
that I think was framed in a way
that was meant to
keep you invested into something you thought was
the biggest event in the world happening at
that moment, when in reality, it's a very
important event, and it's definitely a war, and
people are dying, and it's on the higher
echelon of things going on. But, definitely, in
my opinion, what they were doing was not
accurate, and we'll go through what I mean
by that and the constant stoking of the
World War three development from very particular people.
But overlapping that again from that rather from
that point, getting into the overlap of Elon
Musk and Donald Trump and how that relates,
and, oh, from there, getting into the conversation
of
Palantir
and the other points that relate to it.
Now I'm not gonna get into immigration and
a few other things that I really wanted
to talk about today
because it would have overtaken the entire show
or rather make it extremely long. And so
we'll leave those for the next show, and
I'll give you some points on the way
out for you to to see.
Before we get into everything else,
I just wanted to shout this out. I
really just really love these guys, and I
really had a great conversation.
If you haven't heard Spiderland
and it's spelled with a y,
they're just so unique and so in so
insightful and so they're just too conscientious. Like,
what they're doing with their music, like, a
lot of the people I've kinda started a
thing where I I'm calling it revolution through
music. I'll build a tab for it and
stuff. I'm gonna Derek's gonna be interviewed next.
I got Faithless Town coming in. We might
have them doing a live thing in the
studio here if we can make that work.
The point is I've been really trying to
talk about something. And we've talked about this
for a long time, the overlap of I
use I frame it usually as comedy and
and music, and I'm sure there is more
facets of that, where people tend to not
realize they're absorbing important information because the medium
is different or because they let their guard
down. You know, they're enjoying the sound of
the music and all of a sudden, they
don't realize they're being told about a genocide
that they didn't want to accept. And, you
know, things like that. And even if they
disregard it, it still sticks with them, like
comedy. Jimmy Dore, we I interviewed him about
this in regard to his jokes that, you
know, you'll catch yourself laughing at something that
you may not actually politically agree with, and
that sticks with you. And it it has
an effect. And so that's through the music
channel, I've been trying to discuss that. People
like this that are, you know, to their
own detriment very clearly in the music industry,
writing music, lyrics, singing, you know, and or
just performing at anything about
truth. And the, you know, critical and contentious
information about, you know, whether they're talking about
the building technocratic problem like they are a
lot, or the genocide, like plenty of others,
as well as them. The point is it
reaches people. So I'm gonna continue to to
have them on and and, you know, mute
people in the in the music industry to
discuss how they're doing that, how it affected
them. When this, we discuss about the process
through COVID nineteen and how that changed their
perspective and how it really did surge their
work into this direction, and a lot of
other really interesting things. So I'll include that
link. That's the Substack link so you can
hear that, discuss it. On top of that,
I wanted to show you another one of
these that I see literally every day. But
since we just mentioned it, I just want
you to see the obvious effect it has.
And you have to realize again, for those
that don't know, you know, the the last
American Vagabond account is, what, 77,000
followers followers now? This was pinned to the
top of this account for two days.
It has two likes and one retweet. Now,
look. My point is and this is people
that follow this platform would share that and
like it just because they wanna support the
work. I'm willing to bet you that nobody
even really saw that post, and the idea
is because this was posted there. It says,
great interview from a person that has zero
followers and zero shit, literally.
And it says, the the this person has
insights on market trends, so it has nothing
to do with what we're talking about. Go
look at this guy about crypto or whatever
they keep talking about. Then it says, love
how the music and blah blah blah. You're
trying to tap into what we're discussing. Hashtag
spiderland.
But none of it is about any of
that. Then they block me. There's a reason
for that because the block is what's supposed
to suppress the content. Because as Twitter and
Elon have made clear, if you just are
negative or you get blocks in downvote, then
they suppress your content. So all it takes
is a coordinated effort from bots, whatever the
content is, to make sure these things get
suppressed. Now we weren't shying away from talking
about Israel or technocracy in this in this
interview. So, by the way, as I always
do, this one I already blocked, by the
way, because he's one of these people they
continue to point to, but I tend to
block these two
even though this person already has me blocked.
That's why they do that, as you can
see. I don't know if it makes it
worse or better, but I do it back
just so in case that person can't do
that to me again. Maybe that makes it
worse. I don't know. But worth pointing out,
guys, because there are efforts to suppress TLAB
and a lot of other people on this
platform because we're not falling in line. We're
not partisan.
We're objective. We consider things. We we don't
jump to conclusions as best we can. I
think that's important. Now we're gonna come back
to this, but in case you didn't see
it, it's things like this that are catching
everyone's attention. And I simply said, Elon turning,
in quotes, on Trump is interesting and should
be looked at with a very critical eye,
but would not surprise me. This speaks volumes
about the blind following,
team sports politics types that are already attacking
Elon Musk, only seconds ago attacking you for
not blindly supporting him and his vision for
the world. And now suddenly, okay. Well, what
changed? Did did his vision change? At least
what he said it was. No.
Oh, I know what changed. Him and Trump
were mad at each other. And you took
Trump's side because the lens is good for
bad, bad
good for Trump, bad for Trump. And if
it's bad for Trump, you ignore it. If
it's good for Trump, you promote it. If
somebody who you love starts hating Trump, well,
now you hate that person. It has nothing
to do with facts, and this is the
partisan game. Now there's nuance in there, but
the the real team sport politics types, that's
what you're seeing right now. And as Carrie
I'll read this actually as we get to
the the section Carrie made a good comment
about it. But here's the this little things
like this. Time to drop the really big
bomb, Elon says today. Donald Trump is in
the Epstein files.
That is the real reason they have not
been made public. Have a nice day.
Wow.
I really don't know how and I have
the real tweet. We'll show it when we
go through this. That is I that's the
one of the main reasons why I have
a hard time feeling like this is theater.
Even though I'm really much considering that, and
I'll show you why as we go through.
But that's insane. That's that's a big thing
to point out because that's what a lot
of us are worth considering. Right? Or really
just why they're not giving you the full
picture.
And that that implicates Patel and Cash and
everybody else in the conversation.
Very interesting. Now we're gonna come back to
that. To let's talk about some stuff to
start that I think is clearly
something that is not getting enough attention, at
least in the conversation right now, and is
it's just the extension of the ongoing genocide.
But I really make sure I wanna make
sure on the forefront of the show that
we're aware that this is still happening. It's
not just shooting people in food lines as
much as that's insane and were enough to
be outraged about. It gets even crazier if
you can believe that. Now we just talked
this is the last show on June 1.
Palantir's MAGA collapse and the Israeli US engineered
food aid massacre. It's what it was. Now
in this show, we talk about the the
show before this, we'll have I have further
in the show, talking about just the Palantir
world order development.
And this was the following show where we
discussed the MAGA collapse after it, which is
very interesting to watch to this day. The
people, as you might expect, acting like, you
know, like that meme in the building with
the fire. Everything's fine. Nothing's wrong. You know,
we're great. No one's divided. You're all lying.
Like, it's just nonstop, like, just desperate control
or trying to act like, just trust the
plan. It's all gonna be great. And then
there are those. Like, even that chief Trumpster
account that is going, this is Palantir. This
is bad. We're screwed. I just think it's
a very interesting thing to see. And it's
it's it's
positive, guys. It shows you that there are
people that are even tied, like, right into
the core of this thing that are starting
to go, okay. There's a problem here. Now,
yeah, we could jump in and go, we
tried to tell you before, which in some
cases, I even feel like that's important. But
right now, it's about just trying to be
find solidarity with people that are, for whatever
reason, finally starting to see the problem. That's
just we need to to see why it's
important to look beyond. It's like the COVID
nineteen thing. Yes. People's choices will forever be
theirs, and you should not ignore that. But
we need to try to find a path
beyond this because it's the government that's the
actual problem here. Now we also talk about
the Russia Ukraine point and and how and
my feeling about where it would go, which
is where I think it is now. And
we'll talk about that in, the
right after this opening point, but I'll include
that show. Now
here
is what I put out around this because
the this is also, I mean, verbatim what
I said I predicted, not multiple things like
I said before. But I this and this,
by the way, it's not hard to find.
If you have been paying attention even 1%,
you already know how often Israel lies. And
then when gets caught for the lie, they
alter the lie and lie again. When they
got caught for that lie, they alter both
of them and lie again. Over and over
and over until finally something gives them some
level of, you know, whatever it is. Every
time the Shireen Abu O'Clay discussion was like
that. Five different alterations until finally they admitted
that they were involved, but it was an
accident. When it started as it wasn't us
and you're lying and you're antisemites.
So here we are again. This was on
June 1. Well, technically, I posted this June
2.
Ravi Ravi Abdul from the EuroMed human rights
group posted this. Five contradictory narratives
were put out for, put out for, by
the Israeli army in a failed attempt to
deny responsibility
for the food aid massacre near the joint
US Israeli aid distribution point in Rafa. it
claimed that nothing had happened at all. We
all heard that. Then it admitted an incident
had occurred, but not near the aid center
and unrelated to the army at all, releasing
footage showing aid being distributed as usual, but
that was Rafa, and they got caught lying
about that. Next, it acknowledged that soldiers had
fired shots,
but only into the air. This is all
well after they lied that they argued they
didn't even fire at them. Oh, it was
in the air, and then they claimed it
had no one been hurt.
However, then the Red Cross later confirmed that
its field hospital in Rafah had received 21
dead bodies. Finally, the Israeli army published a
video widely described as scandalous,
trying to suggest the shooters were Hamas militants.
After, by the way, already saying that's not
there was no incidents at all when they
were done with this day. The footage was
in fact from a different location
entirely and showed looting gangs backed by Israel,
which, by the way, on top of that,
has now been confirmed even more so than
before. The point that not just confirming they're
arming these gangs, which you should know if
you paid attention at all over the years,
that they're ISIS linked groups that they're now
even discussing publicly.
Remember, why still claiming ISIS Hamas is ISIS,
apparently, despite
funding both of that? So whatever you whichever
way you look at it, Israel's funding it.
Okay? Enough. Not a joke. It's easy to
prove. Israel is a state built on lies,
he writes. It you it lies as naturally
as it breathes.
And I said exactly as we expected. It's
like this every single time. I'm not being
hyperbolic.
I mean, it is every time, guys. And
why not? They seem to get away with
it even when they're caught lying. Ryan Grim
points out, and the Washington Post has even
updated their report, which is not this isn't
you know, I don't take these people would
lie as fast as they would breathe. It's
in their interest, opportunism, or whatever for trying
to pull this story back to where it
should be. The point, though, is that even
they are doing it, which shows you there
is a change happening.
And he says after the Washington Post, Ryan
Grim says, apologized
for not giving proper weight to the idea
of denial of its role in the massacre
Sunday. CNN published in investigating, citing 17 eyewitnesses
saying the shots came from the Israelis
awaiting a new correction and apology.
It's just wild how clear this is. Now
this,
as he says, is quite something. I missed
my point, guys. Now this Sky News
is a bit a little bit different than
some of the others, but all of them
have clearly shifted. And like I said, all
the way back the week, they'd already lost
the information war. Whatever's been going on up
until then or how or what shifted now,
it's up for you to decide, but it
has shifted.
Now that I my thing like I said
in the beginning,
what I expect, if this goes as bad
as possible for them, is the effort to
throw somebody out of the bus, probably Netanyahu.
He's already hated by everybody, and they act
like he was the only problem, the bad
apple,
and they try to move forward with the
same direction.
Maybe a different narrative, right, which is as
usual, but don't fall for that when that
happens. But here's what here's here's what's going
on on the news right now when they're
trying to discuss this. Israeli army, they issued
warning shots in the air,
and still some of these suspects continued
to advance towards the troops in a threatening
manner. Right. Okay. So people are being told
to show up to get food. They show
up to go up to get food, and
they get shot because they're coming up in
a threatening manner. No one's armed.
None of them. It's it's and remember, the
argument was none of this even happened.
It went off with no problem, they reported.
Right? I mean, hoping that what? Nobody would
see it or find report it? And And
then it was, no. It was Hamas. Or
it was something else, then it was Hamas.
No. Oh, no. Then we shot in the
air. It wasn't them. And that's where he's
coming in. But realize how insane it is
to try to just carry through those lies.
You've already been caught lying. I just it's
but this is what impunity looks like, at
least now, perceived
impunity.
Still further fire was directed,
close to them, but not to them, but
they continued their advance. So we know very
well about this, report. But I must tell
you again that we have released
verifiable
footage
of Hamas gunmen themselves,
flying at Gaza. David, it's the footage that
the footage that you just alluded to from
the incident on Sunday is disputed. It was
not of I don't think it's and you
could literally prove the two things. It was
the wrong location,
and it was the and it was what
the I mean, the bottom line was that
I don't believe it was it was Hamas.
It was and I'm only saying it like
that because I'm not I mean, it's you
know, the reporting showed you that it was
the gangs that Israel's supporting.
And I and I can that you can
prove. But whether or not there are people
like, the bottom line is it's not what
they're claiming. And the the we'll get to
they'll get to it more in a about
the ISIS overlap gang overlap gangs that they
are funding and supporting, which, if you remember,
we've already talked about that a long time
ago and, again, recently.
But it was a different location. The the
the sun was in a different place. It's
it's lazy that they keep doing this. So
that's what he's pointing to. And even Sky
News is like, yep. That's been disputed. Disputes
at the top. Humanitarian foundation decides. No. I
I don't agree with you. I don't think
it's disputed at all.
It's probably disputed by people that want Hamas
to retain
Isn't this a funny way to frame this?
Like, so people clearly dispute it.
And he goes, I disagree. No one disputes
that at all. And it's like, well, yeah.
They they do. I mean, you know that.
Every peep you've seen and then if I
think the only ones that have okay. Well,
then you just lied. You just said no
one, and now you're going, but those ones
do, but they hate they like Hamas. Well,
that means they then some people do. It's
just this is it's just the way their
minds work. And I'm talking about the people
like this that work for Zionism that lie,
which overlaps a lot of religions and a
lot of skin colors. The bottom line is
that it's just so obvious. I don't know
why anybody allowed it to them to get
away with it until now. Or they didn't
up were there
why they allowed them to up until now.
Or, you know, it's just it's very, very
conspicuous. Control of aid distribution.
But we're not gonna have that anymore because
they're they're about this incident best interest
on Tuesday. Okay. They
they're they're they're they're they're they're they're they're
they're they're they're they're they're they're they're would
never ask questions like that in the past,
ever. You know this. You've watched. They they
would just take at face value what they
said, you know, and then ask the other
person, do you condemn them, Moss?
Did they have weapons? Do you have evidence?
Oh my god. It's like there's actual reporting
going on. But, you know, you know, as
my opinion is, it's opportunism or whatever it
is or whether he knows that or not,
the guy doing the reporting, he's being allowed
to from the top down.
It does it's not like they just magically
woke up a year into genocide and started
recognizing it. It's clear that something shifted.
Is not preventing the arrival of Gaza humanitarian
That was not my question, David, as you
well know. Well, you'll have to ask the
IDF for the specifics. Point I'm asking you.
You're here to speak Right. And I'm Well,
I'll tell you that the IDF is not
preventing the arrival of Gaza since that humanitarian
That was not my question, David, as you
well know. The opposite. They have weapons, David.
Precisely the opposite. We are encouraging it. Now
the warning shots were fired Isn't that incredible?
Like, he just pretended like he asked a
different question. He didn't it wasn't even remotely
it wasn't even the same wheelhouse. Did they
have weapons? They're not blocking aid, and they're
making sure they're bringing it in. I guess
his brain sore short circuited, and he just
responded to the question he expects.
Guys, it like like Brian Grim said, this
is quite something.
Thing, the arrival of GARS and that humanitarian
That was not my question, David, as you
well know. The opposite. They have weapons, David.
Precisely the opposite. We are encouraging it. Wow.
Now the warning shots were fired away from
the aid distribution point in response to the
threat perceived
by IDF troops. Now we are facilitating
using this independent operation of this,
NGO, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,
specifically precisely to ensure that aid reaches civilians
and not Hamas. Yeah. Without There have been
many, many occasions of Hamas lying to international
media. And, unfortunately,
international media repeating those lies
that very often lead to text. Lies, David.
Well, I'm I'm putting the questions to you.
And as you well know, in recent weeks,
we have spoken to Hamas about this. This
27
that were killed. Three children were killed. Two
The reports at this point seem to be
over a 100 from that day. But as
you know, it's hard to verify a lot
of this stuff and as, you know, different
reports, different cons disputed numbers. Very clearly, it
went up from I think a 35 was
the number even reported by corporate media. But
the argument is from the hospital and the
rest that it was well over that. Women,
were they a threat as well?
Again
killed. Three children were killed. Two women, were
they a threat as well? Mhmm. Good question.
Again, every bit of news which comes out
of Hamas, of of Gaza is controlled by
the terrorist organization that You see, so this
is something you can quite literally prove. You
you could prove that these were the bodies
that were there. The bottom line is he
just has to say, if it hurts us,
like like the lens with Trump and the
same thing, the two party illusion, if it's
something that hurts us, it's a lie. And
you're just blindly you're blindly selling the Democrat
lies or whatever it is. In this case,
Hamas. It's the same kind of broken narrative.
It's narrative control rather. There have been many
I can read
through. What you're saying? No. I'm not. I'm
saying that you need to verify. Do your
jobs need We love to David, we are
not preventing Gaza from As you know, David,
in this, you and I spoken about before,
we would love to verify this. Mhmm. But
international journalists are not allowed into Gaza, are
they? Why not?
Well, I'll tell you very, very clearly, what,
what what the reason is for that. Our
priority is getting our hostages out,
Not Sky's journalists in. That's Except they don't,
though. Except they continue to cease to like,
we'll get to in a minute. US just
again vetoed a ceasefire, which would have gone
to the point where they allowed them out
or the last one where the phase was
literally about the last of them going home,
and Israel made sure that didn't happen. Or
the fact that the last thing they were
holding up in the ceasefire was about making
sure that Hamas actually was stepping down and
was getting out of the way. And twice
The US and Israel made sure that language
went back in. That's a verifiable fact. So
if the whole point was making sure this
didn't end until Hamas was out of the
way and they finally gave that up and
Israel forced that back in, meaning they wanted
Hamas to remain, what does that show you?
On top of when we get to next,
the funding of these gangs, which are now
seemingly being funded to become a counterbalance to
Hamas.
They're creating the whole situation all over again.
It seems like they recognize they've lost control
completely, and they just wanna reposition themselves back
to square one. We can't let that happen.
Our priority. That's what we care about. Now
real journalists enter Gaza with the IDF. Hamas
journalists, unfortunately, never leave because they work with,
Hamas. And to be fair to those journalists
reporting from Gaza, you won't be alive very
long if you ever do produce any sort
of, output that is against Hamas because Hamas
will kill you. So It's just these broad
you know, there's no evidence of that effect.
In fact, the exact opposite is proven pretty
regularly. And that's not about pro or con
anything or good guy bad guy. It's about
the fact that we can prove the consistency
of it going back. And that's just simply
not true, especially since at this very moment
it's it's objectively clear that Hamas being able
to show them what's going on and show
that they're being lied about and not that's
just in the sense of the basic things
like terror rape, and torture dungeons, which we
can clearly prove isn't happening, would be good
for them. Whether or not they're terrorists pretending
the entire time, that's certainly possible. The point
is these guys just have to lie because
they're exposed.
And I just that and, again, that does
not mean the other side is the good
guy. It just it could, but it just
simply means that these people are lying to
such an incredible degree that everyone has started
to call it out. Just think about the
people out there, probably around you, probably in
your inner circle, that clearly still think that
these people are doing the right thing, doing
God's work.
How in the world that's even possible? Many
so called journalists in Gaza and, of course,
we regret any journalists which have been killed,
real journalists. But, you know, Hamas operatives You're
distinguishing between real journalists and and fake journalists.
But the point is, David, journalists aren't allowed
from international organizations are not allowed into Gaza,
are they? And I'm asking you again why
you don't allow them. Why don't the Israeli
government allow
journalists in? You'll know the charge that's put
to the Israeli government is that they don't
want the world to see what's really happening.
Right. Again, so there's no shortage of output
from, Gaza. It's been on our front of
our screens for twenty months now, but our
priority is getting our hostages out. You're not
letting you're gonna get our live hostages out,
not sending your journalists in. And all the
output that everyone's seeing that has caused everyone
to be aware of the genocide is what
they pretend is just simply not true. Right?
So he just counterbalanced that you are getting
information
with the things he keeps telling you are
completely false. This is my point about the
broken circular logic. He going through his like,
right now, it's because he's on the defensive,
and he's being attacked in ways they're not
used to. And so he's just jumping to
what makes sense. And then the very next
thing he argues contradicts the thing he started
with.
That's what how long have I been saying
that? If you lie about everything,
eventually, you're gonna step on a previous lie
trying to continue something in immediacy. Like, the
what what you're achieving today and the what
you lie about because you have to lie
is gonna contradict something you did before you
didn't even know you were lying about it
because it's a lie.
The it's moments like this that make that
spectacularly
obvious
that this guy is a liar. I will
remind you that Hamas arrested
a BBC journalist about ten years ago, and
they held him. And he was only released
when there was an international outcry, and finally,
Hamas released him. Now that's That that story,
to be honest, I'm actually, off top of
my head, wasn't familiar with. So it's worth
looking into. It's probably true. I'm I mean,
no way is when it's an art especially
since Israel has funded Hamas up until now,
then you see the overlap to them. Nobody
should be denying any of the things we
get or the what they're capable of, especially
since Israel has funded them until now. But
the point is that things from October 7
forward, which is what we're discussing,
have been a nonstop series of continual lies.
And then you can go back before that,
by the way, and it's pretty much the
same thing.
Robert and I have talked about this for
a very long time. But just think about
that, that clearly pointing back to one event
from ten years ago, and the context probably
is something much more than you think, does
not change the reality of what's going on
today.
But overall, they'll use that to claim anything
they want and act like that's justifying everything.
Same outcry
has not happened, for our Israeli,
people being held hostage for
Really? No. He even the Sky News guy
pushes back. Can you believe standing there and
pretending like the world hasn't completely screamed about
this for the at the I mean, there's
people still that only talk about the hostages.
That is the predominant mainstream conversation, like, right
up until a few weeks ago, and he
has the nerve to act like nobody did
that. That's the same thing. They keep acting
like no one's with us. Israel's all alone
because that's the narrative Zionism needs to succeed.
More than six hundred days now, our priority
is getting our hostages out, not sending your
journalists in. David, that is entirely misleading. You
know that there has been international condemnation of
the of the hostages that are still being
held. It is untrue for you to make
that choice. Right? I'm not talking about condemnation
in words. I'm talking about real action. When
real pressure is put on Hamas, the terror
organ Oh, you mean aside from funding your
entire genocide,
arms,
support, political,
media?
Well, I guess he wants The US politicians
to go in with wielding guns and shoot
people in the face. Right? I mean, this
is my point. If you break that down
logically, that makes literally no sense.
Organization, things happen. Well, as you just read,
there's a there's a there's a You know
when they get stronger. I'll tell you when
they get stronger. Process that's on the way
that's ongoing as you know Which they're vetoing
right now.
That's the reality.
So here's what Amnesty International had to say.
This is still from the Right? Well, on
the which they shot people on the but
this is reporting from the The horrific incident
in Rafa yesterday in which Israeli forces shot
at starved Palestinians
attempting to receive food near a militarized distribution
site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which,
by the way, is Mossad. That's even even
WikiLeaks broke that down.
It says for this says,
demands an immediate independent investigation. Palestinians,
this
this bloodshed painfully recalls the flower massacres, which
we reported on the entire time, which was
an exact setup.
I mean, exactly like this was a setup.
And that was the same thing where they
lied about it, then they got caught, so
they changed the narrative. Then they got caught
again, so they changed the narrative again. It's
literally the same story. You remember if you
follow this platform.
And it says, when desperate individuals seeking food
were killed by these rally military. It's not
hard to recognize. Amnesty International is laying out
the facts. And it says, aid distribution must
be conducted through safe, dignified, and effective means.
Management for professionals, humanitarian workers, not mercenaries, which
is what they were. The international community, notably
led by The US, has permitted this appalling
humanitarian catastrophe and genocide to unfold far too
long.
Here is what Prem Thacker had to say.
Read this horrifying testimony from Israel's massacre of
people just trying to get food. Now this
is citing Doctors Without Borders.
I'm far as I could tell, they never
called them Hamas. So let's listen to what
they have to say. Our teams joined the
mass casualty response in Nasir Hospital, Gaza today.
This is on the After another disastrous food
distribution resulted in people getting shot by Israeli
forces, Hear from the what they had to
say. Manasseh Rassai Abdi, a father of four,
described the chaos. People fought over five pallets.
They told us to take food, then they
fired from every direction. I ran 200 meters
before realizing I'd been shot. This isn't aid.
It's a lie. We are supposed to get
go get food for our kids and die?
Quote, I was shot at 03:10AM.
As we were trapped, I bled constantly until
5AM.
There were there were many other men with
me. One of them tried to get me
out. He was shot in the head and
died on my chest. We had gone there
for nothing but food just to survive like
everyone else.
That's what's happening.
Everybody other than Israel and their blind supporters
are telling you that.
That's where we are. Now rec rec consider
that when you're looking at people in positions
of power, these sycophant mainstream alternative
team sport politics who are cheerleading on whatever
the current administration does, they don't care about
that.
You show me where they're talking about this
at all. Whether I mean, it's just it's
either blind support for whatever Israel has to
say, which is pretty ridiculous today in any
context, or ignoring it entirely.
For, like, at least Stefanik,
using the age old, you're an antisemite
for saying children shouldn't be shot.
I think they've just lost the plot. I
think Stefanik is showing her I mean, what
we already know are her colors.
APAC.
Antonio
Guterres, who I'm no supporter of, simply says,
I'm appalled by the reports of Palestinian kids
and injured while seeking aid in Gaza yesterday.
It is unacceptable that Palestinians are risking their
lives for food. I call for an immediate
and independent investigation into these events. Okay.
So far, he's just simply said they were
killed by getting food. Couldn't that also be
Hamas? Certainly could. Israel in in the way
he's framing it is Israel had clear obligations
under our national humanitarian law to agree to
and facilitate their aid. The unimpeded entry of
assistance at scale to meet enormous needs must
be restored. All these are provable facts. At
this point, you could very well argue that
he means Hamas is responsible, but Israel needs
to make that happen. Right? The UN must
be allowed to work when safe. Okay. I
continue to call for immediate
Read it. He's simply saying, This is bad.
We need to fix the situation. So if
you're of the mind
that Hamas did this, how do you not
know that's exactly what he means? And Israel
needs to step in and do something about
it. In fact, the UN, through him and
plenty of others, have pulled punches everywhere about
Israel.
She says, this is outrageous.
And the culmination of moral moral bankrupt morally
bankrupt leadership
as secretary gen general of the UN.
This antisemite
should resign.
I
mean, guys, this is my this is they've
lost themselves at this point. You know? I
mean, either ever either they're of the mind
that everyone in the world is just that
stupid or that willing to ignore their principles
for whatever is the current political
flavor.
I I mean, or and the bottom line
is that that they must think that people
are that willing. The bottom line is either
that's the case or of my mind that
most people are not this easy to manipulate
or not stupid or not complete monsters. And
so when they come out like this and
the guy's like, stop killing children, and she
says, you're an anti semite, it wakes people
up. Even people that support her.
I just think that's wildly insane. And what
he's really doing is simply saying this shouldn't
happen, which everyone can argue, even people saying
it's a mosque. And all she can do
is go, you're an antisemite because the UN
is a mosque, apparently. And all they're pointing
out is that any condemnation of what happened
is supposed to be criticized.
She she knows who signs her checks.
Now on the day excuse me. This was
on the
Twenty three Palestinians killed and more than two
hundred injured as a result of Israeli bombing
and shooting of Palestinian,
Palestinians trying to get food. This was the
day in a row. So you're gonna tell
us this was a random occurrence or a
shot and it was Hamas or whatever your
narrative is that and then pretend, like, when
it happens the next day in the same
way that it's not a clear trap?
Or going back to
the flower massacre. It's what it's what they
do. And for the day in a row,
Israeli forces had shot people seeking food. This
doesn't stop.
As I said, this happens now daily.
It's not just horrific.
This is Israel daring you to call them
out,
threatening you to stay silent.
If you don't call this out, call out
this ongoing genocide, it will follow you for
the rest of your life.
And here just again, it should include this
point about
this is Avi Islam, an Israeli academic telling
you that Zionism is racism.
I have to play it again. You probably
heard it. The bottom line is it's not
contentious, guys. This is the reality.
It's not Jewish people alone, Christians alone, Muslims
alone. It's the driving ideology and what that
drives people to do terrible things. In my
mind, that's not the Muslim religion. That's not
Jewish religion or Christian religion. It's people that
abuse any of those to manipulate people. And
Zionism
is that, frankly, through all of them, it
seems. Even even through the Muslim religion, if
you can believe that. I've shown examples of
that. Or atheism.
There's atheist leaders of the Zionism movement in
Israel. It's just it's it's so obvious today,
and that's why I think people are finally
starting to see it.
June 5.
K? They murdered people on the first. They
murdered people on the second. They murdered people
on the third, and they murdered people on
the fifth
today.
Now I'm
I'm willing to bet you that that will
get evidence that it happened yesterday too. Drop
site news. Wafa reports Israeli forces have once
again opened fire
on Palestinians attempting to reach the Mossad run
aid center. And, again, just so you understand,
the GHF, that is Mossad funded. That's the
reality. That's been proven by I think Gray
zone did a report. I think Wiki Lease
pointed it out.
They shot him again.
Two of the four distribution sites, two, briefly
open today after being closed all day yesterday.
That oh, well, there you go. Now that's
why. Israel has shot and killed more than
a 100 hungry Palestinians
after directing them to walk to the aid
distribution sites. Medical sources confirmed at least forty
three have been killed across Gaza in one
day.
That's today. Following seventy killed and a 189
injured over the previous twenty four hours.
So realize,
not at the distribution sites apparently, but they
still killed seventy people throughout Gaza. It's probably
more than that. So if you understand, this
is just about the aid dynamic. If you
don't know by now that they're literally murdering
people in this country
every single day for over a year, then
you're not paying attention. Whether it's through starvation,
through disease,
deliberate, by the way, manufactured, as they stated
publicly, that'll only help this go faster, these
people are monsters.
They are the world. This is the the
as I said before, guys, this is the
this is the the scourge of our time.
Zionism, the people driving this, it's undeniable
at this point. And yet the people in
the highest levels of power are in lockstep,
including Thiel and Palantir, including Trump, including Biden,
left and right of our government, and most
around the world. If you don't realize how
incredibly serious that is and what that means,
well, that's likely why what's happening now is
happening. The rush to surge into to build
out this Panopticon.
WikiLeaks. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is financially backed
by Israel's Mossad and the Ministry of Defense.
Right? Because the group that's been murdering Palestinians
for a year wants to feed them suddenly.
But they'll do it through their intelligence apparatus
because that all lines up. Right?
It was approved by the Israeli government to
begin distributing distributing food food. Excuse me. So
the government that tried to stop aid the
entire time now decided to allow it. Like,
you you obviously see how this connects. You
can't hide this.
And
for the I don't know what he probably
mentioned it there. For the time, since the
current wave of genocide in Palestine began, The
US has again vetoed a ceasefire.
Now as I understand it, at least was
it over the last couple of days, it
was because they were trying to in in
put in the in the ceasefire, which Israel
will only ignore again anyway regardless of whether
they pretend to agree on it now, which
is consistently what's happened every time. The point
is that in the language, it was that
Hamas will be, you know, not a ruling
faction in Gaza, if not potentially leave Gaza.
And they made sure in that they put
the language back in rather they basically wanted
to make sure that wasn't in the bill.
Or excuse me, that Hamas wanted to make
sure I'm confusing it. The bottom line is
they Hamas to pull it out, Israel in
The US, put it back in twice.
There's no way to misunderstand that. If their
whole time they've been arguing that they need
to get rid of Hamas and that's how
this will end, and it's finally offered and
they make sure that that language is not
or rather they confuse it again, that they
make sure the reality is they want Hamas
to continue, how do you make sense of
that without realizing they've been lying to you
the entire time?
And The US dutifully vetoes it.
Now here's where we overlap with the gangs
that they're currently funding, which shouldn't surprise you
if you've been if you've been paying attention.
This diplomatic correspondent and anchor of,
what is it?
Oh, Con News.
Major major platform in the in Israel.
Here's what he says.
Israel,
how do you say that? Betronu
chairman Lieberman is, currently
currently telling a crazy story on the b
channel about the transfer of money or of
many weapons and crime families
to crime families. Excuse me. Transferring of many
weapons to crime families in Gaza by the
Israeli security establishment. And with the approval of
the prime minister,
it says all in secret, quote, Israel has
transferred
assault rifles and light weapons to crime families
in Gaza.
Israel has transferred assault rifles into is Gaza
on Netanyahu's orders, they say. The weapons are
transferred to criminals and offenders who are directed
at Israel.
They're literally creating false flags to justify what
they're doing. They're literally arming the people they
then send to go attack Israel. They can
go, that's what they're trying to do.
It's just this is I mean, that's why
you need to consider whether the people that
were shot at the embassy or the person
in Boulder. You have to ask yourself whether
we are being played.
But just as just as light just as
much consider that that's just a random event.
Either makes sense, especially when people are being
driven to extreme measures. You're watching children get
starved to death, get shot and raped and
tortured every day and you're not gonna think
somebody's gonna lose their mind over that? I'm
not saying it's okay.
But you have to understand why somebody might
take extreme action. But then recognize that Israel's
also provably throughout history making these things up,
lying about it. Really is wild.
Now here is what, Trita Parsi said. He
said, wow. Israel's former defense minister Lieberman reveals
that Israel has transferred massive amounts of weapons
to criminal gangs in Gaza, whom he describes
as essentially ISIS. Netanyahu approved it behind the
back of his cabinet. Now, again, former former
politician saying that, take it with a grain
of salt. Definitely could be lying. Maybe he's
got political aspirations. You know, being objective, you
have to always consider those things. The bottom
line, though, is that well before this, you
can prove this has been ongoing. And there's
a great breakdown from Gen X Girl and
and plenty of others. I think Mohammed Shehade
did one as well, showing you stuff that
is just pretty undeniable.
Israel she points this out. Israeli news, and
this is the same thing. Claims they approve
the transfer. Going back to this, oh, this
is this oh, there's,
the one we were showing you as well.
Oh god. I brought that up really quickly.
I wanted to see if the
yeah. That's why. I just didn't read it
the time. He says, in my opinion, it
did not pass cabinet approval. The head of
the Shin Bet knows. I'm not sure the
chief of staff knows. We're talking about the
equivalent of ISIS in Gaza.
That's, again, the former minister.
So she writes that he says this. He
claims that Netanyahu did it alone. Keep in
mind Israel's tried
to link Gaza to ISIS since 2023
to justify the genocide even though it's absurd.
And here, even even Twitter says, nope. Not
true. Even even Hamas declared war on ISIS,
which, of course, they could lie about, but
it's ideologically absurd. Like, it's just not the
reality.
And here she writes update, Israel and Arab
news now confirming.
These are, you know, corporate media. Right? Again,
just because corporate media confirms it doesn't mean
it's true. But the reality is, historically, before
this, this is proven. This is what they've
been doing, web outside Israel and inside or
other occupied Palestine, confirming he's armed Abu Shah
Shah excuse me, Shahab
gang to rival Hamas. Footage of the gang
was reported a few days ago during the
shootings at the aid sites.
Israel's former defense minister says Bibi is propping
up Shabaab to counter Hamas like he propped
up Hamas to rival the Palestinian authority.
Derek's been tell or, Robert's been telling you
this for a very long time.
Now knowing that and knowing how it's very
clumsily being manufactured, and nonetheless knowing that that
Trump or Biden or any other US leading
politician in the world seems to be going
okay. Rather, ignoring it, pulling your punches while
now kind of feigning to be outraged but
still giving them weapons. Right? Just consider how
clumsy that is and what that means for
the world and where we're going. Here is
what the ICJ had to point out about
this. And we talked about this. The
I mean, guys, it they've it's it's actually
wild to realize that they've been ruled to
be plausibly committing genocide. You have every human
rights group in the world. They're telling you
what they can see. There are reports of
them raping people in prison. They talk about
it publicly on TV and argue about why
it should happen. The rape reports. I mean,
everything.
Even the UN and other groups, it's just
on the surface.
On top of all that,
they're killing children, as you know, one every
six minutes. In fact, I think it's more
than that today. But what we could prove,
every six minutes.
Right?
So how long have we been live right
now?
Forty seven minutes. Let me do the math.
How many children? Guys, I mean,
it's just unparalleled.
Just since we've been on the show, that
many children have died.
And we gotta pretend like this is some
kind of, you know, coincident
human shield. I mean, just nothing makes this
make sense other than what you damn will
know is actually happening. On the basis of
the current figures,
on average,
two hundred and forty seven Palestinians
are being killed
and are at risk of being killed each
day.
Many of them literally blown to pieces.
They include
48 mothers
each day,
two every hour,
and over 117
children each day,
leaving UNICEF to call Israel's actions
a war on children.
On current rates which show show no sign
of abating,
each day,
over three medics,
two teachers,
more than one United Nations employee,
and more than one journalist will be killed.
Many while at work or in what appear
to be targeted attacks on their family homes
or where they are sheltering.
The risk of famine will increase each day.
Each day, an average of six hundred and
twenty nine people will be wounded.
Some multiple times over
as they move from place to place,
desperately seeking sanctuary.
Each day,
over 10 Palestinian
children
will have one or both legs amputated,
many without anesthetic.
Each day on current rates, an average of
3,900
Palestinian homes will be damaged or destroyed.
More mass graves will be dug.
More cemestries will be bulldozed and bombed, and
courts is violently exhumed,
denying even the dead any dignity or peace.
Each day, ambulances,
hospitals, and medics will continue to be attacked
and killed.
The first responders who have spent three months
without international assistance,
trying to dig families out of the rubble
with their bare hands
will continue to be targeted.
On current figures, one will be killed almost
every day.
Sometimes in attacks launched against those attending the
scene to rescue the wounded.
Each day, yet more desperate people will be
forced to relocate from where they are sheltering
or will be bombed in places
where they have been told to evacuate to.
Entire multigenerational
families will be obliterated,
and yet more Palestinian
children
will become
WCNSF,
wounded child,
no surviving family,
the terrible new acronym
born out of Israel's genocidal
assault on the Palestinian population in Gaza.
Just can't get much more clear than that.
I was just looking really quickly to get
some more points to add to what's going
on. Curious as it develops before we get
back to that.
You know, just just recognizing how severely obvious
that is, the information, the facts, the research.
I I just it just has to be
make an impression
what that shows you about the power structures
of the world today. Now as Aaron Mate
points out from Gaza notifications,
breaking medical teams rescue. This is June 2.
An infant from beneath the rubble after the
Israeli army bombed his family's home in the
industrial area of Gaza City.
One of many civilian locations, they're bombing without
repercussions. It never stops. And Aaron just simply
says, unfortunately, this infant isn't old enough to
understand, as enlightened western adults do,
that Israel has a right to defend itself.
Very well put.
Now to add what we're just discussing,
Dan Cohen breaks this down today. Netanyahu
confirms
that Israel is arming the Shabaab gang. They
it's it's Yasser Abu Shabaab's gang in Gaza
to fight Hamas.
Dividing Gaza into concentration camps ruled by gangs
that has been Israel's plan since November 2023
at least as he breaks down in that
link.
Prime minister's office has effectively confirmed the story.
So now they're openly claiming that they're funding
an ISIS linked group or rather, you know,
terrorist organization as even they would call it,
which, by the way, shouldn't be shocking if
you understand any of this.
Now Aaron goes on to point out this
is not just in Gaza. Again, just kinda
quickly plash together so you make sure you
see that this is not unique to one
location, whether Syria, West Bank, Gaza,
Lebanon,
many places around the world. It's just very
I mean, The US, by the way, happening
to you right now, I think, at the
behest of Israel in a lot of ways.
Mass murder in Gaza, pogroms in the West
Bank.
This this is a multiple Palestinians reported injured
in Israeli settler attack on a village in
the occupied West Bank in Ramallah. The entire
thing is on fire.
No one seems to care about that. Remember,
Adelson paid Trump to be able to illegally
annex the West Bank, and it clearly seems
to deal has has been taken.
Robert points out from Lebanon perspective, Israel's bombing
today eight civilian buildings. So they're shooting people
in aid lines, bombing children's houses, burning down
the West Bank, and then bombing eight civilian
buildings in Lebanon. You know, it's a slow
day for Israel. Mass displacement of the residents
south of the capital. A rushing truck overturned
blocking civilians from fleeing. That seems deliberate to
me. Seems to how they tend to do
this. Couldn't maybe, maybe not.
The point of could have bombed and flipped
over on its own. My point is I
keep seeing this organized sort of choke point
where they create a trap and kill people
or lay out toys that blow up and
kill children or have drones
put out voices of children screaming for help
so people come out and try to find
them and they get shot. Every day this
is happening.
He says Netanyahu is trying to provoke a
war to save his coalition.
State of alert issued in the North.
Here's the report from, Associated Press. Israel strikes
Beirut suburbs
to target what it says is Hezbollah's drone
production. Isn't that interesting? Now what's interesting is
they lie about this like they're breathing these
days about whatever justifies the murder of people
they wanna kill. But what's also overlapping and
interesting when we get into the next point
about the Ukraine and Russia
is it very well may be something their
bombing has to do with drones because right
now, they're probably aware that the world knows
that they were involved
with what's happening at the behest of Ukraine.
I mean, none of the mainstream alternative media
seem to be able to piece that together,
but Israel's involvement with what's happening in Ukraine
is transparent. The US and Israel are involved
with this. I mean, in my opinion, far
more than the NATO conversation. But either way,
the point is the Western you know, what
we're discussing today, the building panopticon of technocratic
AI, that is the same kind of blob.
And and Israel is an adamant, active part
of that.
Or maybe they're doing it as best as
somebody else. But realize, when we're gonna get
into the drone attacks going into Russia, I
think that there's gonna be some level of
response, and maybe that has something to do
with it. Personally, my gut tells me it's
just a lie. Just a narrative to hide
the fact that they just bombed eight suburbs
in in Beirut.
Now one last point I wanna highlight on
this because I think it's coming to a
head right now, as we recently pointed out,
is the the Freedom Flotilla. Now we've been
covering that for a long time. Multiple events
in the past where they they sank one
a long time ago. They killed people on
it. They now the one since I've been
covering the news is one with, Joe Meaders,
who was a US Liberty veteran.
And he no. All of them. If you
find any US Liberty veteran today, they will
tell you that Israel shot it, and they
know that, and The US covered it up.
And yet we still lie to ourselves about
it. The bottom line is they allowed it
to happen.
They covered it up, and they circle back
more than once and killed Americans on that
ship. Joe Mitter is a veteran of that,
tells you that to this day. He was
on one of these flotillas years back. Israel
arrested them all, beat them up, held them
in prison for a month. The US never
said a word.
Clearly, they care about Americans. Right? No. Israeli
Americans, maybe.
But today, we have another example. Now, of
course, you get a lot of the childish
partisan right or, you know, any childish partisan
side is the same to me, but in
this case, the right that we'll ignore all
of this because Greta, she's stupid.
Who cares about whether the point is about
the boat and what Israel's doing to people
that also includes a lot of innocent other
people too, not just stars. But with Liam
Cunningham, who's just on the Game of Thrones
and others, he's he's on this either this
or another ship as well. I believe there's
more than one if I'm reading it correctly.
But either way, they're heading to Gaza to
deliver aid, which shouldn't be a problem with
what Israel keeps saying. Right? But they will,
something's gonna happen. So this is what you're
seeing even from from The US blind Israel
supporters as well as US politicians as well
as fake human rights activists or lawyers in
Israel. Here's Wilt Chamberlain saying the Israelis could
do the funniest thing
in regard to King Greta's on her way
to Gaza.
I wonder what that funny thing would be.
Now that's the lightest of them, but you
damn will know what he's insinuating. It gets
worse. Here's Lindsey Graham. Hope Greta and her
friends can swim.
Are you kidding me? This guy is so
outside. This Lindsey Graham is the most extreme
caricature of what Israel's done to this country
or whatever you think is driving it. That
you're willing to stand up and say things
like that that are, that are I mean,
that's is there anybody that doesn't see that?
I mean, everyone called him out for that.
You're literally jokingly threatening this this ship being
attacked.
It would be a major crime?
You know why, guys? Because they don't care
about that. They won't say a word. As
I said, so now even US politicians, along
with Zionist Israeli politicians,
are insinuating that Israel will yet again illegally
attack another freedom flotilla and potentially kill those
on board. This occupied government is truly showing
itself. Zionism is terrorism.
Here's Arsen Motrovsky.
I call him a fake human rights lawyer
because I don't know how in any world
a human rights anything would act the way
this monster does. But he says, oh, look.
The little jihad, Greta Thunberg,
is trying to get into Gaza
to show solidarity with Hamas.
It would be so sad if something were
to happen to her flotilla.
That's what this guy wrote.
You you mean, people will do
some people say free Palestine and get censored
on this platform. Are you not gonna pretend
that if somebody did this about an Israeli
ship and said, oh, it'd be too bad
if that got if that, you know, if
something happened to it, you damn will know
what Elon and their ADL run, Yackerino style
platform would do.
Or the fact that
jihadi grew why? Because she supports Palestine? They're
to solve the Earth from us? No. She's
been they've spoken about this. I don't support
any of them.
Frankly, I think for this her actions of
this could very well be a setup from
the establishment based on how she's been used.
Maybe she woke up from it. I don't
know.
But it's easy to see how this can
be played. Bottom line is these people are
so they feel they have so much impunity
that they will openly threaten
innocent people.
Because there's there's plenty of other random people
on this ship, including her, that are just
I just it's just I don't understand
how this is not enough
for average people.
Here's Craig Murray.
Rather, this is from Rema Hassan, someone on
or at least involved with or on one
of these ships. Says we've just received a
distress call,
most probably from a boat, and this is
from today, leaving Libya.
According to foreign front techs, we're the closest,
so we're changing direction for two hours to
get there and rescue the boat. In yellow,
our initial directory.
In green,
where their current direction.
See? They're on their way. And on the
way there, they get a distress call. And
as I understand it, I think if you're
closest to a ship in that scenario, you're
you're I mean, it not not required, I
don't think, but obligated in some way to
if you can help out.
So I agree with Craig. Now understand Craig
Murray is not a con someone that's perceived
as a conspiracy theorist. And only recently in
the conversation did he publicly admit that he
used to push back on people talking about
Israel controlling politicians,
not Jews, but Israeli government because of the
same, you know, construct that's made up. And
he publicly came out and said I was
wrong. It's very clear what's going on, which
is why I respect him so much.
And he says, I do not like this
at all.
The the Madeline, which is that ship, which
is the one that I feel like has
that the the I thought she was from
a TV show. I can't remember what she
but she looks familiar.
That there's a lot of people on it
regardless.
Is that the ship Madeline is unlikely to
be the closest vessel at two hours distance
in these busy waters and is not equipped
to take on potential scores of people. He
says, I strongly suspect this is a trap.
I certainly hope not. He says the Madeline
could be physically closest, but it's slow, averaging
about eight knots so far. It's most unlikely
others cannot get to the this boat sooner.
However, you cannot ignore an SOS.
Well,
we'll have to find out.
But I'd I this is, you know,
a concern that this is some kind of
an effort to, in a in a less
conspicuous
way, shut this down.
Now B'Tselem, the leading Israeli human rights group
who has openly reported into 2021 that Israel
is an apartheid state led by a Jewish
supremacist government, that's their words, and, yes, that
is the reality. Does not mean every Jewish
person involved thinks that way. And it also
means there's Christian supremacists in the same way
that are leading through Zionism. It's always important
to point that out. But it's also important
to make sure people understand that when you
make those statements because of how much they've
been blinded by the Israeli propaganda.
Israel is paying influencers to spread its propaganda.
Here's this is Beth Selim breaking down this
report, which I think is important. Might be
controlling your favorite influencer.
Here's how you spot them. When Benjamin Netanyahu
came to DC to meet with Trump, most
of the attention was focused on their plans
for Gaza.
What completely flew into the radar is that
Benjamin Netanyahu had another meeting where he met
with a group of conservative influencers.
The group included podcasters Tim Pool, Dave Rubin,
and Sean Spicer, and writers Bethany Mandel, David
Harris Junior, Jessica Krause, Seth Mandel, and Molly
Hemingway. Some of the people on this list
have several millions of followers and they were
meeting not just with Israel's head of state,
but also as diplomatic
adviser and the Israeli ambassador to The United
States. There are no Now to be clear,
you could always argue they're just, well, I'm
a journalist, and I'm trying to talk to
a head of state. Okay. But then
why was there like, the reality is you
understand it. We already heard from Tim, the
whole ex got exposed about the Chatham House
rules. They didn't report on this. There was
not a they all just if if nobody
had even found out, we wouldn't even know
they met with them. That's not what journalists
do.
Videos or direct quotes from the meeting because
it was conducted under Chatham House rules, which
is basically a rule set for meetings in
elite circles where the people attending, especially journalists,
meet on the basis that nothing said in
the meeting can be directly attributed to any
individual and then you can only say what
was generally talked about. Some of the topics
covered include Iran and anti Zionist sentiment online.
While we don't know for sure everything that
was discussed, it's hard to imagine that Netanyahu
convened influencers
for any other reason than to try to
convince them to be propagandists for Israel. So
is there any evidence of Israel manipulating online
spaces to change public opinion?
Yes. In fact, it's a stated position of
the Israeli foreign ministry. Just three days after
October 7, Israel launched an initiative to recruit
social media influencers in The United States to
defend Israel. A spokesperson said, fighting on social
networks and influencing international public opinion is critical
during wartime.
The world must understand that Israel's struggle is
one of light against darkness,
a life loving culture versus lowly terrorists.
It's obvious why Israel needs propaganda.
The only way to have a country based
on legalized racial supremacy
is through propaganda, like Nazi Germany and Jim
Crow apartheid had that twist the reality of
the situation.
And Israel actually has its own word for
propaganda, which is Hezbara, which translates to to
explain in Hebrew. In the weeks following October
7, Israel already had a lot to explain.
A number of American influencers got emails offering
them $5,000
and brand sponsorships
in exchange for doing a single live stream
supporting Israel. The email read, I'm reaching out
to you on behalf of a global collective
of agencies,
influencers, and content creators who are coming together
to raise awareness about the difficult situation in
Israel. As you're aware So I'm gonna leave
it there just because it's a long video,
and I just wanna make sure you saw
this, but there's a lot more in there.
And the bottom line is two things.
People that would enter into that knowing what's
going on,
I there's just no way I can take
them seriously. But the the point is that
there are people in that position
who might not allow themselves to acknowledge what
that really is. Now that's their fault, and
maybe you could even argue someone is just
simply not aware of it. But the bottom
line is that's how easy it is to
get people it took into a certain direction
where they don't realize or like, the point
I'm making about in general, you know, the
the the
most of the field today, if not you
know, like, the bottom line is that or
the bots and the manipulation, it's worth considering
that a lot of this field is completely
overrun by people that don't even know that
they're part of an organized manipulation,
Whether that's partisan driven, money. You know what
I mean? There's all sorts of factors that
I really do think that's most of what's
happening today, if not a large part of
it. And so what you're seeing there
is very clear. And, you know, this is
the Ben Johnson types and the ones out
there that already got overlapped. Even
Tim Pool with the other one. And that
same kind of what was the group? I
forget the name of it now. But it's
not hard to see how common this seems
to be. And whether it's because they just
don't care where the money comes from and
they're willing to take whatever to say whatever,
which is the same thing to me, or
they're doing it because they do have an
agenda or interest in the overall, you know,
whatever, Israel's outcome or whatever it is. This
is just everywhere you look right now. It's
worth making sure you understand that. As Sal
Diagris points out, Americans killed, injured, or traumatized
in Middle East wars.
Well, the one says 1776
until 1948, you know, before Israel. The number
is zero. 1948 to 2025,
after Israel,
492,000,
which is probably way more than that when
you understand that the entire war of terror,
war on terror, which was all over the
Middle East, which killed a lot more millions
and millions of people,
Americans and others,
was because of
that. Now here is a US politician, if
you wanna pretend that. He says, free Palestine,
simply the
words, is not about freedom.
It's about killing.
It's about evil.
We need to start recognizing evil for what
it is, he says. No American deserves to
live in fear for simply existing.
Okay.
So you're telling me saying the words free
Palestine
is threatening someone's existence?
Yeah. That sounds like woke censorship to me.
Well, that's exactly what congressman Randy Fine
traffics in. And you won't be surprised to
find Arson Ostrovsky reposting that.
But this whale of a Zionist is a
absolute monster, the kind of person that will
post
bombs away after the post, a picture of
dead children in Gaza, or continue to tell
you that there's no innocent people there. Kill
them all. He has repeatedly stood by that,
doubled down every time, and Trump has endorsed
him more than once. This guy is an
absolute monster, one of the worst in all
of congress.
I just want you to understand what he's
saying here. This is not free. This is
unconstitutional. This is a US politician rather than
one somebody pretending to be, somebody pretending to
care about Americans, who is actively using
cancel culture to get you to censor other
Americans.
Now look, even if you agree that people,
everyone everywhere, which is just dumb to say,
who says free Palestine
actually wants things to be bad or wants
murder and terrorism,
well, until those things happen, you're allowed to
say whatever you want. That's what we all
understand. Randy Fine does not or is trying
to, you know, wants to ignore the constitution,
trying to destroy it for the interest of
something else.
I thought I'd grab that.
Hold on.
I just have to stress again while I'm
grabbing this. This
Randy Fine, if you just if you simply
just look for yourself, look at the content
this guy puts out. The the he is
an extremist
in the interest of Israel
and and at the expense of Americans. So
there's really no way around it.
In this country, we have a hard decision
to make.
We have to make a decision about whether
we are going to continue to be afraid
or whether we are going to call evil
by its name. Yeah. You know, Randy, I
happen to agree. And what most Americans right
now, which is, like, the most easy thing
to prove,
are worried are aware of, worried about is
the group you support.
I have news for you.
When someone chants
free Palestine, what they are calling for
is the destruction of the only
Jewish
state
in the world. Ask pretty much the plenty
of Jewish orthodox organizations with lots of in
Israel, in The United States, all over the
world
are screaming about it. Israel does not represent
every Jewish person,
clearly, as they seem to attack and call
out any Jewish person who does not align
with Zionism, which pretty much shows you the
reality. I could play 50 clips in a
row of prominent Jews, of ex IDF, of
people from the Israeli government, of all across
the board,
holocaust survivors that tell you that Israel is
a bastardization of Judaism.
But you shouldn't have to just take my
word for it. Just look for yourself and
understand the history that you can quite literally
prove. Aside from the lie that that's the
only Jewish state in the world, the bottom
line is he's trying to create the narrative.
Is the destruction of the That anytime somebody
says free Palestine, that that's what they want.
So it's not possible that somebody, you know,
just wants Palestine to be free like Israel
seems to pretend they want. Well, think about
how broken that logic is. Israel has always
pretended they wanna stay for Palestine. Right? So
when you come and go, I agree. Let's
free Palestine. Oh, you hate Jews. Well, didn't
you just say that?
It's the same as everything else they do,
guys. It's clumsy.
But this guy is not fighting for Americans.
The only
Jewish state
in the world.
When someone says from the river to the
sea, what they are calling for is the
genocide
of every Jew who lives in Israel
and abroad. We have to make a decision
as a country.
Are we going to call evil by its
name,
or are we going to continue
to live
in fear?
Well, check this out.
So Randy here,
in between the snacks, wants you to think
that saying from the river to the sea
means genocide. Right? Okay. Well, explain to me
why it's in the founding charter of the
Likud party, which is Netanyahu's party.
I said, well, here it is, being used
right in the Likud party's original party platform,
Between the river to the sea,
between the sea and the Jordan, there will
be only Israeli sovereignty. Same exact point. And
Elon Musk showing you his colors at the
beginning saying, anyone saying that is censored except
it's Netanyahu or anybody Israeli or anybody who's
not Palestinian. And other than that, strong stance.
Right?
They're ridiculous.
Here,
it's Khaleesi pointing out, Netanyahu says, quote, in
the future, the state of Israel has to
control the entire area from the river to
the sea. I said, but, Elon, I thought
this was genocidal language and would be not
accepted on the platform, but you damn well
know how this works. So it just shows
you how these morons are they know they're
wrong, guys. They know how easy it is
to see they're wrong. I guess that I
guess that APAC money is more important.
And last part of this is to include,
of course, what you expect to see
the long running thread, which I probably could
keep continuing of before the selection process that
Donald Trump continues to tell you that he
will censor Americans for Israel over and over
and over, and you just didn't wanna hear
it or never saw it. But that's the
reality,
and now it's happening in real time.
So talking about this hype from Israel that
clearly is driving The United States to more
warfare, whether it's through
through Ukraine or about Iran or whatever other
conversation we're having,
It is not it's I mean, it is
easily one of the most clear things in
this conversation that that the US government has
been fighting Israel's wars for a very long
time.
See if I had that just maybe the
beginning.
Let me see if I can bring this
up real quick.
Oh, yeah. I think I got a short
version. Yeah. It's worth playing real quick.
Starts, and it's it's really fascinating to go
back. It starts, in 1996
with Netanyahu,
who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the thesis of the book is, quite
straightforward and
and
very
dangerous. He says, you know, there are there's
Hamas, there's Hezbollah.
They oppose Israel. It's not good for us
to fight them directly.
That that won't work.
What we need to do is topple
the governments
that that back them. So what we need
is regime change throughout The Middle East. And
he actually gave a long list of seven
countries,
that included,
Syria,
Libya,
Iraq,
Iran,
Somalia,
Sudan, and Lebanon.
And systematically,
The United States has done Netanyahu's bidding for
almost thirty years now going to war
with every one of them except for the
big one, that Netanyahu
so much longs for, which is the war
directly between The United States and Iran.
It's transparent, guys. The way it's there's there's
no way to deny this with unless you're
just ignoring the facts and going with whatever
they said last, which is what they want.
So
bringing this to
today, rather the
The US border chief warns, that's Holman, by
the way,
terror attack worse than nine eleven is imminent.
Like,
if you take time just search for that.
Worst nine eleven. It's every year for post
nine eleven. Every time. Well, a new threat
is on the they use it every time,
and it's not based on anything other than
here's the circumstances.
I I can read it to you directly.
So you have to understand,
warns of a new attack. So you'd expect
them to be like, okay. There's some kind
of a report, some kind of a new
indication. This group is rumblings. We saw we
heard chatter. You know, the dumb things they
used to say. Could be. Right?
Apparently not.
He's bore the Homan, the borders czar, dropped
the bombshell, terror warning, which is not unique
at all, claiming that nine eleven or worse
is imminent. Tom Homan blamed the immigration and
border policies
of Joe Biden.
Okay. So is there anything substantial? So there's
immigrants in the country. Yeah. Yeah. There are
a lot of them. The reality is there's
illegal immigrants and that should be taken care
of. Then that's what should be done through
the constitutional realities, which you're not doing. The
bottom line is this abstract argument
that's an invasion or a war that, by
the way, you claim is somehow connected to
Venezuela in order to initiate the Enemy Aliens
Act, except you claim Biden did it in
an abstract way over the process of four
years. Sure sounds like an invasion from a
state actor.
How dumb this all is. The bottom line
is he's simply pointing at that as the
argument for why there's another nine eleven type
event coming.
I mean, it certainly could be, but that's
a completely abstract argument. And if you're going
to make that argument, why don't we consider
the fact that Israel has been calling for
the fall of the West, has been rationalizing
in its end times discussion from their biblical
Zionist direction,
and had been caught bringing people in this
country. There was one during the last administration.
The guy who was accused of being a
Palestinian that everyone said was an example of
Hamas coming in the country,
and then he got exposed for being an
a a Mossad asset from a different country.
And then everyone dropped it and ran away.
We covered that story. There's obvious overlap to
this. The bottom line is to argue it
is what they want it to be is
probably the most unlikely in this conversation, at
least from the conversation of it's somehow, you
know,
not The US and Israel
are I mean, their track record throughout history
of manufacturing the events they need to justify
the next step is everywhere you look, nine
eleven included when we're discussing Israel. Appearing on
Fox News, he was asked by Hannity whether
America was at risk of a nine eleven
style attack.
Coleman pointed to what he claimed was nearly
2,000,000 immigrants
migrants that entered the country illegally. I thought
that was 20,000,000.
Isn't that what you were all saying? 20,000,000,
which by the way was
laughably false.
He said there's a lot of them, by
the way, millions. But now it's 2,000,000? I
feel like that's a strange sidestep or, you
know, deviation from the narrative. And he says,
This scares the hell out of me and
I've been doing this for four years, which
by the way is also very common for
them to say. I mean, almost verbatim. He
says it should have scared the hell out
of every American what the Biden administration did.
Well, yeah. I mean, the illegal immigration is
a concerning reality, and it does it's not
a small thing. But if you're gonna pretend
like that's more important than what they're currently
building, that even conservatives are freaking out about,
you're ridiculous, which this is their this is
an effort to hide that in my opinion.
I'm convinced something's coming unless we can find
them.
Oh, you mean just all the immigrants? Okay.
Very self serving their home, and especially since
this will get to in the next show,
he has a financial investment with one of
the companies that's wildly profiting from arresting all
these migrants. But nothing to see there. You
know, ethics pledges and all that that none
of them are involved in. I mean, you
see where this goes.
Now I'm gonna get into this in the
next show just because I wanna see this
develop, but you probably saw this reported.
Two Chinese scientists charged by the FBI for
smuggling dangerous biological weapon into The United States.
Even the way they frame that is very
dishonest.
It certainly could be something more with agroterrorism
fungus. Now briefly overlapping to this, what I
find interesting, there's two way this very well
could be exactly what it looks like. You
know, coming from, like, an Occam's razor perspective,
the fact that Chinese entities
that, at least on, like, superficial means seem
to be connected to the government, but other
than that, there isn't. You know, it's their
statements and different overlaps. You can read it
for yourself.
Seems to be the most it wouldn't surprise
me at all. For example, the point being
to quickly explain this for those that haven't
seen it. The idea is they were caught
bringing in,
it's right here. It's called
it's called
where was it? Damn it. I just had
it.
Oh, that's frustrating.
You'd think it would be the thing that
I mean, this is just one of the
I had many of these up, but I
was reading about it today.
There it is, for crying out loud.
Fusarium
graminarium.
That's the that's the Latin, you know, name
for this fungus.
Now my point though is that they got
caught with this, and, you know, you know,
when things like this, these little baggies
marked with this stuff,
bringing this in.
Now one of them,
I think on an h one b visa,
interestingly enough, works at, Michigan or a a
school, where, by the way, they do research
on this exact thing. And it's interesting. The
argument is that this was some an attempt
to and and by the way, this exact
fungus seems to affect crops
and a lot of other things, which okay.
My point is, would China do I think
absolutely. I think all these governments are, you
know, kind of surreptitiously
doing things like that to you know, imagine
if you could do this and all of
a sudden dramatically,
decrease the crop's yield.
That would have a huge effect on the
country. Right? So that makes sense.
Now that my point is that's one thing
to consider. Don't the idea that we should
immediately assume that because of partisan agendas, that's
that's stupid. There's I right now, you can't
prove this was China doing this. As much
as I do argue it's the most likely
Occam's razor style, you know, all things considered,
the most simple explanation tends to be the
correct one. But worth consideration is the alternative
or many alternatives to this. Think about where
we are in the world right now. Now,
oh, I should add, and, again, I'm gonna
I I might go in this deeper if
this develops
more, that this fungus was originated in The
United States. And if you do the research
on it I oh, yeah. I I don't
think I have it up here today.
If you do the research on it, it's
prevalent in The United States.
So other experts have commented as going, that's
not even really a threat. The idea of
this being brought in would be a threat
doesn't really make sense. It could, you know,
especially if it might be a different strain
or something like that. But at the end
of the day, this doesn't seem to be
that big of a deal. Except there FBI's
involved and they're arresting them. We're calling it
agroterrorism.
Okay. So, again, acknowledging that the explanation does
seem to be very likely. That's like, right
now, if I was gonna bet, that's probably
the idea. But considering what's going on in
the world, think about the overlap. You've got
visas. You've got h one b overlap. So
legitimate visa conversation, but terrorism.
You know? So that's a problem. If you
consider even real visas that that makes sense.
On top of the idea that we're talking
about a biological issue, we're talking about foreign
nationals.
I mean, there's just a lot of overlaps
here that seem to ring a lot of
bells. I just think that's worth considering.
And the idea that they're trying to turn
this into something that might be, you know,
a agroterrorism,
like using this kind of pathogen or whatever
you would call it, you know, a fungus
to hurt the crops.
And, you know, I just it's worth considering
that this might have been something that was
multifaceted. They decided to just take advantage of
these Chinese people that were bringing this back
to studying the place where they were already
studying it because it's something that's already happening
and it's not a very big threat and
ultimately to create the narrative about why immigrants
are bad, why China's a problem, why visas
shouldn't be taken to face value. I mean,
there's a lot of things to think about.
So that's, again, just throwing out the things
in my mind.
Interesting story. It seems to continue to develop,
but I just be careful. You don't jump
to conclusions. The reason I included that is
the overlap of the upcoming threat, nine eleven
style. This seems to be an interesting time
tie in. But from that point, let's discuss
the Ukraine Russia overlap. Now here's the report
we talked about, June 1. Ukraine drones strike
deep in Russia heading military planes. There was
the follow-up to that, I think, the day
or the day after about the the bombing
of the bridge between Crimea.
Now my point on this was this is
obviously a big deal. I mean, this is
a huge war between a nuclear powered entity
and a a proxy element that's armed by
a bunch of nuclear powered countries.
And, clearly, that's a developing problem. And we
no one should be diminishing the reality of
what this is, neither with Israel, neither with
you know, in Gaza, neither with even The
US involved in Sudan.
The war dynamic going on today is increasingly
problematic.
My point, though, was that this event that
was, like, hair on fire, we're all gonna
be in World War three in thirty seconds
from the Joneses of the world, seemed to
me to be a serious act, but not
that much of an escalation from what we've
continued to see. I've seen The UK Times
report in the past is The US was
literally flying in people from the Azov movement
to bomb inside of Russia.
So the the targets, yeah, that was a
big deal. But over overall, as some as
you'll hear some people point out, largely seems
to be an effort to embarrass them and
and really to make the statement that we're
not gonna seek peace. Now my point in
all of that
is you have to understand that saying NATO
did this, if you think that Trump was
not aware of what NATO did, then you're
completely naive. That's ins that is wild to
think, while certainly possible.
So of all, recognizing that that action included
The United States. That's obvious. But more specifically,
that the CIA and, specifically, the CIA has
been funding and arming the Azov movement well
before they even called that, back to the,
like, to the nineteen forties. And Israel has
been involved with arming them for a long
time since then. Now I can bring all
that up. I bring it up every time.
So the reality is what they're doing, this
is a proxy war. And my point on
top of that is that Russia knows that
and has stated that going back to the
beginning of this arm of it. So to
act like what just happened is somehow going
to drive Putin to take action beyond what
he already argued is just hyperbolic to me.
On top of the fact that he didn't
say, I'm gonna bomb NATO countries when that
happens,
which is what the reporting is. He said,
as we pointed out in the past, he
said that we hold you responsible.
You're arming this country. Whatever NATO country is
arming Ukraine, which is all of them, it
seems, we're gonna hold you responsible, which, of
course, could include attacks.
That is not even remotely the same thing.
That, to me, is a a measured response
saying that if we wanted to, you damn
well know you could be attacked because we
know what you're doing. Now, as we're gonna
show you in a that does not we
didn't see an immediate response in regard to
NATO countries
despite all of the hyperbolic screening of World
War three. So let's go through some of
this, and I'll tell you why. Again, not
unimportant.
But what was being done seemed manipulative to
me.
Here's what Jones put out on the
He says, Zelensky celebrates massive NATO strikes on
Russia. Now his whole thing is about trying
to not make this about Trump. Somehow, NATO
is trying to sabotage
Trump's peace plan, which isn't even Trump's peace
plan. I mean, it's just a weird way
to frame all of this. To me to
me, it's about trying to
whatever the narrative has to be to make
sure Trump is not the one in trouble.
He didn't do it. He's not the one
breaking the rule. He's not the one that's
looking stupid. It's all NATO trying to sabotage
what he wants.
Well, certainly possible. But are you gonna pretend
that NATO is not including the US government
and that he wouldn't scream about
that, that they didn't tell
us? Seems silly.
But he says,
the West is now officially at war with
Russia, and World War three is here.
God, it's just such a ridiculously
irresponsible thing to do when clearly that's not
actually the reality.
Now
here's what he said back in September
2024.
Nuclear war alert. Putin predictably says he will
nuke NATO countries, nuke them.
So stupid. With with missiles if if, if
western missiles strike Russia.
In response now here,
same as always.
Always, they point to that. Look. If if
you do that, we will we do not
we how do they say it? We reserve
the right to respond with nuclear you know,
whatever the claim and not saying we're going
to do that. Just like or even, honestly,
Trump and and and or The US and
Israel are very active in being bombastic with
their responses. If you do this, I will
do, you know, more than we've ever done
before in history, which always implies something serious,
but then they don't do that. Right? So
even them,
it's just so frustrating people can frame it
this way. He goes in response, NATO has
announced the biggest mobilization drills of total war.
He fearmongering fearmongering hyperbolic. World War three, it's
on the way. Right? Well, before we get
to a point I wanna make, on the
fourth, Ben Swan highlighted what Donald Trump said
on true social. So keep keeping in mind
that on the we said World War three
is already here. We're officially at war with
Russia.
Trump and Putin have a phone call on
the fourth.
He says the call lasted an hour and
fifty minutes or so we're told from Trump.
Putin says Russia will have to respond to
airfield attacks, which is, I guarantee, is going
to be, which I think has already happened
in some ways, attacks on Ukraine, which is
what you'd expect.
And he says, Putin could help broker Iran
deal, Trump says. It's a good conversation. Here's
what he wrote. I just finished speaking by
telephone with president Putin on Russia. The last
the call lasted hour fifteen. We discussed the
attack of Russia's docked airplanes by Ukraine.
And, again, don't don't miss for a that
Putin is well aware that means The US,
that means everybody involved with Ukraine, and, really,
more them than Ukraine because it's a proxy
war, which he has said.
And even, by the way, even the Trump
administration admitted that when they came into power
because they wanted to make it seem like
Biden was doing it, and now it continues.
It's just it's just so lazy. Everything's falling
apart. We discussed the attack on Russia's planes,
he says, and also various other attacks that
have been taking place by both sides.
It was a good conversation, but not a
conversation that will lead to immediate peace.
I mean, there's obvious reasons why. The the
the this is not what Trump and the
rest are pushing forward.
President Putin did say and very strong say
very strongly that he will have to respond
to the recent attack of the airfields.
Yeah. If you're trying to contort that into
a NATO country or The United States, while
always possible, there's literally no strategic benefit to
him to do that,
which he has shown himself to not be
as belligerent
and bomb and, you know, with the word,
just over the top as the peep as
the West and The US in particular. But
he says, we also discussed Iran
and the fact that time is running out
on Iran's decision to pertain to nuclear weapons,
which we must act very
made very quickly, he says. I stated to
president Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear
weapon. And on this, I believe we were
in agreement. President Putin suggested that he will
participate in the discussions with Iran and that
he could perhaps be helpful in getting this
brought to rapid conclusion. Who knows if any
of that's even true? He says, in my
opinion, that that Iran has been slow walking
their decision on this very important matter, and
we will need a definitive answer a very
short period of time. Right? So as everyone's
trying to act like he's totally being tricked
into something with Iran or it's not what
he wants,
it's unbelievably
clear that they are warmongering towards Iran. They
said it when they got into power. They
said it before they got into power. Vance
and all the rest threatening Iran. You better
do this. You better do that. We will
attack you like you've never seen. And you're
gonna pretend like he's not driving that
for Israel or whatever their level reason is.
And so my point is
what was World War three on the is
now Putin's gonna ret retaliate to Ukraine, which
is what it seems to be to me.
So recognize that hyperbolic framing and what they
were trying to distract you from. On top
of that, the idea that
the conversation about Iran is not wildly relevant
as it will be more as we go
forward this little stretch here that this is
what he's focused on. So just keep all
this in mind.
And by the way, Arctic, Ginger says Trump
knew about the attacks. It was NATO, which
I agree with. It's very important to understand
that there's no way in my mind that
he was not aware of that
because that's how they're trying to frame this.
Like, it happened without his knowledge. Okay. Here's
the
after the Crimea bombing the the bridge they
bombed. He says, NATO strikes again.
NATO
breaking for the the time, Ukraine security service.
So Ukraine makes an attack, and he says,
NATO strikes again.
Well, even which I don't necessarily disagree with
in the context of how this is being
run, but his whole point is making it
not Trump.
And he says, it's
time underwater.
The operation took months. Underwater supports were badly
damaged at the base. The bridge is now
in critical condition. Another attempt, he says, to
derail Trump's p p's plan.
So NATO again attacks, and you're you're literally
trying to frame this as Trump not being
included and that that's it's his peace plan.
They're trying to what peace plan? It's just
infuriating that people take this per take this
person and what they're doing seriously.
He says on the on, today, NATO backed
Ukrainian military caught by a Russian drone camera
executing dissenters. Well, yeah. They've been doing that
the entire time, and the US government and
Israel are all about it. They've still funded
them. They're still arming them. Didn't he say
he was gonna end all this on day
one? You know how he could've done that,
Alex? He could've stopped funding them, but he
hasn't.
You know that. You're not stupid, but you
clearly are a part of this. He says
as Ukraine slowly reaches the last stage before
a collapse of combat capabilities,
Exclusive footage from Russian scouts.
This person says, please verify this, Grok, and
it says the claim that Ukrainian soldiers executed
deserters lacks credible evidence and is likely false.
I just thought that's funny. Now to be
real, my point is that it's not debatable
that they're killing their own people. Like, guys,
I've been saying that since the moment they
started because you could prove it. What's funny,
though, is he takes this clip at a
time when it's interesting. It's for his interest
and makes a statement that even Grock says
it's false, which, by the way, is not
unique to Alex Jones.
Now here's the point about World War three
as night, Nightwatch Nate put this together with
a few of them. Just showing you
that he says this a lot. And screaming
we're in World War three or it's about
to be nuclear war,
at what point can you say that to
where I mean, how long can you keep
saying that until you I mean, I guess
forever, because people don't care. I guess they
like the excitement they get when reading about
the end of the world. The point is,
as Alex Jones was right, he does this
a lot. Let me show you that very
quickly. This goes back to this and I
could have kept going, by the way. December
2023.
Breaking World War three alert. Biden tells Americans
prepare for war with Russia for a time
in one month.
Hyping and and shit, which, by the way,
if you look back at this time frame,
the idea that we were ever you know?
Look. To be clear, in a real sense,
the world has been at war in a
lot of ways that you could even argue
meets the metrics of before World War for
a long time. But what he's trying to
do is act like we haven't gotten there,
and this is the moment where it all
begins because that's what gets people's attention.
01/16/2024.
Emergency. Leaked German military document details the countdown
to World War three.
How'd that happen?
February 15. World twenty twenty five. Oh, actually,
this should be this should be up here.
Hold on. I'll come back to it. This
one is March 28. Oh, wait. Oh, no.
I'm sorry. I'm mixing up the dates.
Oh, wait. No. I'm not. Yeah. See, I
did mix them up. 2025.
My point was to keep going through the
time frame. Here's 04/14/2024.
My point you could find every date. I
just it looks like it looks like I
grabbed 2025 on accident. It is very look
up World War three or w w with
three i's.
It's constant on this platform. Here he is
on April 2024. Israel purposely dragging America into
World War three. Well, look at that.
Funny how that's not the conversation now. Funny
how you can literally make the case that
Israel's dragging us into war, and then Israel's
never been more involved than right now, and
suddenly that's not the case anymore.
I don't know what you call that, fair
weather journalism. I don't know. I don't even
know what you frame this as.
Here it is on 05/13/2024,
EU wide conscription. And you say World War
three?
Here it is on 06/23/2024.
World War three in overdrive.
Russian sunbathes sunbathers
slaughtered in mass by missiles
as Trump takes lead. So the US government
continues to arm their proxies to kill people,
and then, you know, it's
twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four.
Twenty twenty four September, Jack Posobiec issues warning.
NeoCon, Harris axis threatening World War three to
save regime.
So same thing now, but now it's NATO's
fault because Trump's in power.
10/20/2024.
World War three alert. The final countdown to
martial law. The total war accelerates as western
political establishment collapses into delusional competence.
It speaks for itself. 11/19/2024.
Live coverage of the potential start of the
nuclear World War three.
This one is '20 November 25 '20 '24.
On the globe on an edge, the world
on a razor's edge or excuse me, a
globe on the edge, the world is on
a razor's edge,
age, all due to in part to the
hidden saboteurs of our short time on this
globe,
whatever that
means. Here is 12/09/2024.
World War three has already begun.
Okay. Well, if that's the case, how is
it now starting today, Alex? You gotta help
me out with this. I'm I'm behind on
this. General Flynn warns the Biden family is
officially trigger World War three. Okay. That didn't
happen. We're not there. I mean, you got
you guys have to start being honest about
this. This is 03/28/2025.
Total effing war.
UK and France officially sending troops to fight
Russia and Ukraine.
World War three? This is World War three.
How many times can you say that?
Feb February 15. See, I got I got
it mixed up. 2025.
World War three incoming? Globalist puppet Zelensky pushes
for NATO to strike Russia. Oh, so you
mean the globalist puppet that Trump is still
arming and and funding and supporting?
Try to work that one out.
Now this one's funny because this is 10/07/2024,
but he points back to 10/07/2016.
And he says, quote, you gotta be all
in because when you're all in is when
god gives you the providence,
and that's when we stop World War three.
Clearly clearly, it's been working for him quite
a long time to keep screaming that's where
we are. Now, by the way, on an
alternative point,
here's what Tucker Carlson's podcasting about right now.
Tucker Carlson wants once warns Trump that neocons
are trying to end his presidency by going
to war with Iran.
You mean the thing that they're all screaming
about that Trump is aiming at that he
keeps going, they better do this or we're
gonna go after them? Right? I just I
I think there's a very clear interest in
trying to get anybody's
fault but the person that you're supporting. That
is team sport politics.
Now here is Rachel Blevins giving you her
opinion on this from a nonpartisan objective perspective.
Reports say that US had no idea Ukraine
was about to carry out the unprecedented drone
attack, which, again, I find near impossible to
believe. And if that's the case,
how is that? And then wouldn't they be
screaming how NATO's been informing us of their
actions even though we're funding? You know Trump
would do that.
And it says another attempt by Trump to
separate himself from the war he's supporting. See?
Even if you think he was unaware, you
can't decouple those things.
And this
wasn't necessarily
to
inflict damage in the sense that it would
harm the Russian military on the battlefield. Right?
The point of this was to embarrass Russia.
The point of this was for not just
Kyiv, but for all of NATO because we
have to remember that this is an attack
directly from NATO. The point here is to
embarrass Russia and to show Russia that, hey,
You may have some of the best air
defenses in the world. You may be able
to take down all of these drones that
we send your way. But what are you
going to do when we
sneak drones in containers, in trucks, deep into
your territory, and we carry out this coordinated
attack.
Again, this is not about Kyiv gaining territory
or gaining any kind of advantage on the
battlefield.
This is about them trying to embarrass Russia,
and it's about them trying to make Russia
look weak. So you have Russia in this
position where they've made it clear that they
are willing to engage in talks, whether it
be with Washington or with Kyiv directly.
They have plans for talks coming up in
Istanbul
on Monday.
And then on Sunday, you have an attack
like this one carried out across Russia in
five
different Russian regions. If ever there was any
kind of message coming from Zelensky and from
Kyiv that they are not serious about coming
to an agreement to end this war, well,
there's your message right there. There's your message
in all of the reports that are talking
about how much effort and planning
went into this attack. This is Zelenskyy
telling Russia that he wants more war.
I believe it.
But then my point is you have to
understand who has been pulling a string this
entire time. Now as I pointed out in
the past,
it's not I mean, it's it's a very
clear possibility that Zelensky could go rogue.
I've said that in the past about the
idea that maybe, you know, that he is
upset that he's not getting the support he
wanted from before or whatever, and decides to
do that to kinda pressure them to give
support. I mean, it's certainly possible. So consider
all of this, but the point is to
recognize
just how clearly the people on the partisan
side of this on either side will just
pull any punch, will hide any fact, will
ignore, blatantly misrepresent things just to get the
case that they want, or rather that Trump
is the one that's saving everything even as
you watch him being involved with everything they
claim is not his fault. It's just insufferable.
It just doesn't stop.
Now Anab Batrand writes this.
Leonid
Rogozin, I'm not familiar with, says drones fly
it's it's what Rachel was commenting on. Drones
flying out of a truck
whose driver had no idea, that's what they
claim anyway, near a strategic airbase,
Three bases in total. It it is a
spectacular
operation of Ukrainian secret services, also the future
of organized crime and terrorism all around the
world.
This war will have a grim, long lasting
legacy. Now the way they did this
screams of exactly what the idea has been
doing in Gaza and elsewhere from October 7
forward, and long before that, if you've been
paying attention. The kind of well, which is
what he'll speak to. Like, this is a
big deal, I understand, in the way they
did this. The problem he says with attack
is that anyone
can play this game against absolutely anybody.
And that's that's what they want from this,
fear everything all the time. Notably, including the
Russians when they need to engage in what
they call asymmetrical warfare. The genie goes out
of the bottle. He says, correct in the
tweet, when dust settled, it turned out only
two bases have been attacked. So here's what
Arnad points out.
He says, essentially, it's the same type of
action as Israel's pager attack,
turning civilian supply chains into potential weapon delivery
systems
and making them inherently suspect.
It should be deeply troubling to anyone thinking
through the sheer irresponsibility
of the precedent set. Now who does that
sound like to you? That doesn't mean you
have that's not a proving point. But just
think about that. And even he connects it
with the belligerence of the Israeli pager attack.
Worth considering how this plays out and who
might be involved with and who benefits
from this kind of thing.
Now overlapping this with the Elon Trump kind
of blow up,
because I do think this is relevant for
I mean, if not
because
of what that shows of the people that
were trying to screen that this was gonna
save everything, and now they're all choosing sides.
It's just it's very clear that if they
now that they're all splitting apart, the people
that are doing that
were lying or wrong or whatever it is
because it's just they're clearly if they were
telling you the whole time that either one
of them were the best in the world
and they're not gonna lie to you, we
should trust what they had to do, and
now one of them's not, then they were
wrong, right, or lying. And the point is
they're not admitting that. They're just going, you
know,
driving in. So my point is that or
that maybe this is an orchestrated event to
hide
what was very apparent to their base,
whether that's the technocratic Palantir direction or or
I mean, even the ongoing genocide. You have
to understand that this does seem like what
would be necessary to derail the awareness that
was building. So just consider that as we
go through it. I mean, I I that
is a very real possibility to me. Now
I wanna include this before we you know,
so we consider this on top of it,
that we just saw this weird kind of
the the way this developed through the court
system. Now
it's gonna be back and for me. Just
consider that I think I'm considering both possibilities
or many of them equally. I'm saying that
because these points will jump back and on
whether it adds to which one. Right? In
this case, I would argue this adds, and
I'm not gonna make that point every time.
I would argue this adds more to the
idea of why it would make sense they
have a a break. You know? And this
is, on May 28, the judge says Musk
must face lawsuit over his role role in
Doge. Simultaneously,
the judge ruled that Trump
spared from it.
So that if I was Elon Musk, I
would start thinking, okay. Am I the scapegoat
here? Am I the one that's gonna be
used like I've seen around Trump in the
past? So that makes sense to me. Worth
considering.
But here, start this was a report from,
the June 1. And it says, Trump asked
Musk if Doge was BS, then called him
half boy. Now this was before this kind
of recent explosion where people were still trying
to play it off like they weren't really
hating each other. You know, he gave him
that key, and he sold him, and they
that was the plan. Well, clearly, either it
was the plan, this is part of it,
or you were wrong and that they were
already breaking up and trying to maintain that
semblance of it. But it says, was this
all BS? Trump apparently asked advisers about Musk
cost cutting under the bill. Now here's that
point right out of the gate.
The the screamers out there in the partisan
field were telling you that everything Elon said
was true, that every single thing they did
was accurate. They were cutting all these costs,
and we were saving the world. And now
many of them are saying, Elon Musk is
a Democrat or whatever,
showing you that they were just going along
to get along. And many of us around
this were simply going, well, I don't know.
Let's look at the data. He seems to
be lying about that. And some of them
were true. But even Trump is not going
where they were being lied to about all
this. But to me, right there, that starts
to build the idea that Trump was somehow
this bumbling fool who didn't even know. Was
he lying to me? I don't buy that.
So that's why I think that the you
know, there if there is a separation in
reality, that's think that's Trump trying to paint,
you know, plausible deniability.
I think that's very interesting. Now it says
Musk pledged to cut 1,000,000,000,000,
and they claim only a $17,070,000,000,000,
but even that was proven to be false.
And it says Trump was often at odds
with Musk, the billionaire eccentric humor
accent his eccentric humor often confused the president
according to people reporting on this, but he
said Musk he's he he told the aid
that Musk was 50% genius and 50% boy.
He says, Musk frequently butted as with Trump's
staff according to the journal, and it escalated
to the point that Trump asked White House
chief of staff Wiles to step up and
better manage Musk. We remember that. Trump didn't
even know the exact moment Musk was leaving.
Trump didn't even know the exact moment he
was leaving until Musk posted it. Now these
are all what we're told.
If this is a constructed thing, that might
not be the accurate truth. But it says,
in the wake of the Times report, Republicans
and Democrats have, alike, have connected Musk's drug
use, which is court the mainstream conversation, I
would argue, with his erratic behavior. Frankly, I
don't care about any of that unless it
is directly affecting what he's doing. And it
does appear that I mean, something is. My
point is that it's not about, you know,
consenting adults do what they want with their
own body.
Alright. It shouldn't take sending adult adults do
what they want with their own body. The
point in this is to wonder regardless of
why or rather just acknowledging regardless of why,
and that may matter in the in the
end result, that it's happening. Right? That what
he's doing is erratic or that he's lying
or whatever. And it says including his Nazi
salute, which, you know, to me is the
least important of all the stuff we're talking
about, but it is interesting the way that
that went down. Musk's departure from the Trump
administration is also fueled by plummeting Tesla sales.
It says, quote, I have to get some
heat off me and my companies. That's what
he said, the Wall Street Journal reported. The
electric car company's net income dropped by 71%.
Okay. Another point. All these people, like Cat
Turf, for example, just couldn't stop screaming
that you guys are wrong. Tesla's
popular than ever and showing you, like, a
two day shot of the stock that what's
going up and then you look at the
post, you know, since the the administration and
it's still wildly down. It's just they're just
have they're they clearly had an interest in
trying to paint the picture that made them
look like they were winning. Oh, yeah. The
whole we're winning thing. Right? Promises kept. Start
reevaluating
that whole thing because right now, it's starting
to be shown as a false or falsehood
because the people that were saying that are
now picking sides.
So they could be lying again. Right? Now
they're suddenly lying that it didn't happen because
they hate Elon. Bottom line is it's the
this, in general, is to show you the,
you know, fair weather nature of partisanship. That's
why we're always trying to expose it.
Trump, however, said Musk
won't stay away entirely. Elon is not really
leaving. He's going back and Now that's where
it ended on the right, where they tried
to still pretend like we're good, everything's happy,
and he's coming right back and
Now
June 3, Elon says, I'm sorry, but I
just can't stand it anymore. I think this
is what spun it out or at least
it was supposed to look that way. This
massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional spending bill is
a disgusting abomination.
Shame on those who voted for it. You
know you did wrong. You know it.
So as you can see underneath it, plenty
of people still tried to go, everything's fine.
Everything's fine. Like that like that meme in
the burning house. You know? He he they're
still great, and everything's still friends. He's just
trolling. He he has an opinion. He's allowed
to have an opinion. Right? You know, really
desperate trying to make it all seem like
it was still good.
Shauna simply says, Trump literally met with congressional
conservatives to demand they pass this bill. You
donated to his campaign. You did this. Simultaneously,
there are people that are trying to act
like Trump is the one that was sabotaged
by the congress by it's just it's
facts don't matter today, guys. The people in
partisanship will just patch together what they want
to make it make sense.
Now, alternatively,
Chris Martinson and others are simply, you know,
welcoming him and say, oh, good. Call it
out, which I do understand. Like, they're trying
to use what he's saying to reach other
people, saying, millions stand with you on this.
You're a 100% correct. The bipartisan support for
ruining the future of this once great country
is dispiriting.
Massey, Johnson, Ron Paul are doing their best.
Put it, but it's on a three but
it's a three on a five thirty two
flight. The point is all those people, Massey,
Johnson, Paul, you know, they're generally adversarial with
Musk and Trump in the way they were
all going.
Here,
this is today,
is pretty
a severe kind of extent jump on this.
And he says, Musk says Trump would have
lost election without him. So that's where you
start to feel this being contentious.
Right? Oh, yeah. Well, he wouldn't even be
in there if it wasn't for me. Like
and that's what you expect when this spins
out like we've seen in the past.
Billionaire tech, Musk said Thursday, Trump would have
lost the election if the race wasn't if
it wasn't for him, escalating a feud that
erupted earlier that day.
Now Musk then tweets on the fourth or
rather, excuse me, that's a little bit jumped.
This is back to the fourth. This is
Jerome Powell saying,
or rather the parody account, excuse me, saying,
MoneyDoge
has saved the government,
which, by the way, was a lie. We've
proven that many times. Then it goes Trump's
big bill, crash out of the way. Just
pretty funny. And Elon Musk goes exactly or
his bot, you know, whichever one it was.
Doctor Simon Godek says this is what a
dying empire looks like. Record deficits, endless wars,
no accountability. I agree. But he goes, Elon
Musk gets it. Politicians
don't. Now I'm you could I'm not sure
whether he believes Elon Musk suddenly sees it
or he's just using that to because what
he says now is in alignment with what
he agrees with. I I think Simon does
good work, so check it out. But the
point is simply either way, I think it's
important to consider that Elon Musk doesn't get
anything and really is just playing this new
role. As Derek writes out, for those who
are already falling for the Elon wakes up
to the agenda narrative, stop.
It doesn't take much research to see that
Elon is literally a mere image of Klaus
Schwab, the World Economic Forum, Bilderberg,
etcetera.
He's a military industrial a military
industrial complex contractor, brain ship promoting transhumanist technocrat.
And he's links to an article he wrote
for T Lab, you can't hide Elon Musk
and SpaceX are helping intelligence build the world's
largest spy satellite network.
He post to our conversation, should you trust
Elon Musk? We all discussed that. You know?
And a lot of great work around this
very important discussion.
His simple point is not that we know
for sure, but just don't take it at
face value. There's a lot of reason to
see even if he is pushing back against
Trump because of their petty disagreements, he is
still the problem. Like, a lot of them
are. Like, he like, you know, Teal and
Palantir in general, what they're doing is what
we're most concerned about. And by the way,
as Derek writes and plenty of us pointed
out, what we were telling you or we
were worried about, not that we were absolutely
positive it would materialize just like this, but
we gave you the outlines of what we
saw coming. And by god, that's on exactly
what's happening right now. So it's frustrating to
a degree.
Now Bennet Johnson,
weirdly enough, you know, he usually wades in
and takes the Trump side on almost anything.
But this time, he just said, for obvious
reasons breaking, Trump responds to Musk on true
social and leaves it super with no comment.
He says, Elon Musk was wearing thin.
I asked him to leave. Oh, that's different
than what we were told, wasn't it? I
took away his electric vehicle mandate that forced
everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else
wanted, that he knew for months I was
going to do, and he just went crazy.
Interesting.
So the idea that you even considered forcing
everyone to get a car, isn't that exactly
what the left was doing? It's just so
funny. Had that happened, the cat terrors in
the rest of the world would be telling
you that it was for our best interest
because it's the right kind, like you already
saw.
Then Then he says the easiest way to
save money in our budget, billions and billions
of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies
and contracts. I was always surprised that Biden
didn't do it.
See what I mean? Like, so you're are
you willing to pretend that that was his
mindset before?
If you were surprised Biden didn't do it,
you were willing to not do it too
as long as he was on your side.
But now he's not, so now I can't
believe it.
We're dealing with children, guys, and you gotta
be honest about that. This again, unless this
is some,
you know, theater act,
which, again, my point from before about these
is I find it hard to believe that
they would make themselves look this stupid, but
it is a desperate time that calls for
desperate measures, and you would argue that this
might be what they need to trick people
that aren't willing to be tricked right now.
But it is pretty
conspicuous.
Now Godeck points out,
and it's his mind to comment, Pandy, Bongino,
Cash.
This is the most this is the one
I showed you earlier.
Time to drop the really big bomb. Trump
is on the Epstein files.
That's and he says, mark this post for
the future. The truth will come out.
Wow. Now that's kinda scorched earth. Right? I
mean, that seems like a very big thing
to say. Here's the actual tweet. Oh, wait.
There it is.
It's right there.
Trump is in the Epstein files. That is
the real reason
they have not been made public.
Wow.
Honestly, that is what pretty much the sole
reason that I'm feeling like this. There might
be some level of truth to this. But
it has marked this post future. The truth
will come out.
Wow. Now read all the comments. It's really
interesting to see how people respond to this
kind of stuff because they're torn. Like, they
they've built this in their mind as that
team, and now suddenly, they're attacking each other
in ways that make the whole thing fall
apart Bongino and Cash. And by the way,
to be honest right now, the only people
out there that are looking like they're right
about a lot of this are the people
that are objective and nonpartisan.
And there are a lot of us right
now. But just think about that. And yet,
f the rest of them are spinning out
trying to make it all make sense for
their side.
Elon Musk's ads
or rather does designers. Elon Musk reminded president
Trump of his own words. And he says,
wise until I can't believe the Republicans are
extending the debt ceiling. And he goes, I
have wise words.
No member of Congress should be labor eligible
for reelection for our country's budget. Whatever. His
point is he's agreeing. 100%. I agree more.
Could agree more.
Elon Musk puts this out today
and says, where is the man who wrote
these words?
Was he replaced by a body double?
Tapping into yet another conspiracy concept? Who knows?
Not to say you dismiss anything. You know
that these things exist in some context, but
whether it's a like, I think it was
what,
what did was it Jones that said Gates
was a robot or a demon? I forget
which one said robot or demon. The point
is that that thing those things came out.
Or it was Trump that's that suggested that
Biden was a robot.
Jones said
Gates was a demon.
Not that that's relevant today. My point is
just saying that, you know, he's a body
double. He's a robot. Interesting timing.
That almost adds a little counterbalance to, like,
that feels contrived, but you can my point
is I don't know.
You can come to your conclusions about what
the evidence show.
I said Elon turning on Trump is is
interesting and should be looked at with a
very, very critical eye, but would not surprise
me. This but this is the point I'm
really stressing today. This speaks volumes about the
blind following team sport politic types
that are already attacking you on only seconds
ago attacking you for not blindly supporting him.
Here's what Kerry had to say. Very telling
that Elon is now saying Trump is the
on the Epstein list, but it apparently wasn't
a problem for Musk until they had a
public feud. Very good point. So he's willing
to hide
the Epstein list
as long as he's on the right side.
Or, alternatively,
he's willing to lie about what's on there
to attack a person he was moments ago
aligned with. Again, either way you look at
it, it shows you what we're always trying
to call out. This is broken. These people
are dishonest.
It says Trump is vaguely threatening to cut
Musk contracts as punishment for criticizing the big
beautiful bill. I hate that we have to
call it that. But these contracts weren't a
problem until Musk disobeyed.
See the point?
Suddenly
I know I shared that.
The point is that, you you know, if
those are bad thing, why were you allowing
them to happen? Well, clearly, because they're they
will do anything if their side they will
ignore the problem if their side is doing
it. That's the point. He she also adds,
if I were skeptical of political power, or
I am, she says, I'd assume both are
deeply unprincipled and willing to ignore grotesque realities
that inconvenience their quest for more authority.
Yeah. I'm telling you. You're not following Keri
Wessler. You're missing out.
Now today, recently before I went live, president
Trump says, I don't mind Elon turning against
me. That's how he's framing it. But he
should have done so months ago. Right. I
mean, it just it feels very weird, doesn't
it? There's something about this that is standing
out. Now here's what recently was put out.
There's, like, I'm gonna go over some of
the most recent ones too. Dose designer put
this out. Trump saying, oh, I think I
might have it. Let me see. Yeah. Here's
truth what Trump had to say. But if
they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania.
I wanna buy a lot.
But I'm very disappointed because
Elon knew the inner workings of this bill
better than almost anybody sitting here, better than
you people. He knew everything about it. He
had no problem with it. All of a
sudden, he had a problem, and he only
developed the problem when he found out that
we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate
because that's billions and billions of dollars, and
it really is unfair. We wanna have cars
of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric,
but we wanna have a gasoline,
combustion.
We wanna have different we wanna have hybrids.
We wanna have all we wanna be able
to sell everything.
And
when that was cut and congress wanted Either
way, except his base doesn't agree with that.
The vast majority of them. So it's worth
pointing out. Cut it.
He became a little bit different, and I
can understand that. But
he knew every aspect of this bill. He
knew it better than almost anybody, and he
never had a problem until
right after he left. And if you saw
the statements he made about me, which I'm
sure you can get very easily, it's very
fresh on tape,
he said the most beautiful things about me.
And he hasn't said bad about me personally,
but I'm sure that'll be next.
But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've
helped Elon a lot.
Mister president, did he I just wanna clarify.
Did he raise any of these concerns with
you privately before he raised them publicly? And
this is the Exactly.
Right. So did he only just scream about
this now that it's in the interest of
making you look bad? It's just so crazy.
So Elon Musk says, false.
This bill was never shown to me
even once and was passed in the dead
of night so fast that almost no one
in congress could even read it, which, by
the way, we'll get back to about Marjorie
Taylor Greene now acting like she's aghast at
the terrible bill that she agreed to and
voted for. These people are ridiculous.
As we know, they don't read these things.
Massey and plenty of others have pointed that
out. And now she's even willing to expose
that to sort of, like, put herself back
on the right side of history if if
that if you're willing to to accept that
absurdity.
Now Donald Trump says the easiest way to
save money in our budget, billions and billions,
is to terminate Elon's subsidies and contracts, as
we just told you. He says today, in
light of the president's statement about cancellation of
my government contracts, SpaceX will begin decommissioning its
Dragon spacecraft
immediately.
So, again,
some of these things if we start seeing
real action here,
unless you can see a benefit in this,
it's hard to feel like this is not
organic.
That's clearly unless, again, you can find a
reason for why maybe this was never real,
it wasn't actually gonna happen or you know
what I mean? Like and that would that'd
be why you could make it look like
it's going away. But if this is an
important thing for the US government and he's
pulling it back, that's hard. That seems to
acknowledge it suggests that this is a real
feud. On top of that, does that mean
he's gonna start offering it to another government?
What happens if that happens? What if he
starts offering this to China or Israel?
Would you start I mean, think about how
much this could spin out to where it's
like, you know, not that I told you
so, but, you know, going back just the
idea that we can
see how quickly this can devolve and that
everyone can't see that means that what was
going on before was simply not accurate. Or
that they're lying now, and it shows you
they're all dishonest.
So this is an important thing to think
about, and we'll have to see how that
goes forward. But all these subsidies and contracts,
I mean,
Biden and then the rest were continuing them.
Trump continued them. He's got I mean, over
I mean, here's another way to look at
it too. What about the NRO? What about
the spy satellite network? What about the other
contracts? If that doesn't go away, then that
adds to the idea this was this this
is a
feigned act. The simp the token to get
you to think it didn't. You see, I
get this is gonna go back and I'm
just my point is we don't know. Not
right now, anyway. It's all bubbling up today.
So Ian Miles John, one of Elon's little
lackeys on this platform, says president versus Elon.
Who wins? My money's on Elon.
Trump should be impeached, and JD Vance should
replace him.
Wow. Well, that's your
what's that? That,
Anchorman.
That escalated quickly.
And as many people are now pointing out,
isn't that what we all worried about from
the very beginning?
And Elon Musk says, yes.
Not to my question, but, yes, the he
thinks that that should happen.
That maybe, you know, win or maybe that,
you know, JD Vance should take over.
I mean, a lot of us were saying,
well, Theo Teal's little, you know, Manchurian candidate
might take power if something happens.
And wondering if maybe that was how this
was all supposed to go.
The patriot boy sure thinks so. He says,
oh, yes. Elon Musk admits what the plan
was all along,
an attempt to replace Trump by impeachment with
their technocrat wonder boy. Now
I it makes sense.
But I Trump is just as much a
part of all of this in a lot
of obvious ways. So unless he was just
maybe, you know, because he'll more so concerned
about his immediate benefit and he doesn't want
you know? I could see a way that
he might not be the golden boy in
that regard very easily.
Just consider that, you know, that replacement seems
a very difficult thing to accomplish. Like, not
difficult, but just that there's a lot of
waves when Trump might just as much be
able to carry that out. But either way,
we were a lot of us were considering
that. And maybe that was something that Trump's
a part of. Who knows?
JD JD was the pick of the Silicon
Valley PayPal mafia led by Peter Thiel, Sachs,
Anders, Andreessen, Elon himself. They all convinced Trump
to pick JD, as we remember. We've talked
about that many times. This is why there
was such a heavy presence of the tech
CEOs at Trump's inauguration.
It's not just that. There's a lot of
overlaps to that. This is what you you
think Zuck flipped just because Trump was shot
at? Zuck got the call. Now, again, that's
his opinion. I'm not really of the mind
to you know, I I never think it's
right to speak to the intention of people
because you never know. That's our opinion. But,
nonetheless, it's obvious to see that this is
something a lot of people are considering.
And it says, let's allow Palantir.
The this also why Palantir had played so
much a prominent role.
Interesting.
Now Derek points out what Elon Musk says
about Epstein and Trump being on it and
says the soap opera between billionaires is just
that, wrestling soap opera. It could be about
building up vans as Trump's eventual replacement.
All I know is that Epstein Trump relationship
is only a surprise
to the most blind MAGA.
He said I reported on it in this
point twenty eighteen documentary.
In in in 2015 article, there's one question
the media refuses to ask about Donald Trump.
It's all right there. Why you should be
following Derek Derrick Rose.
Now let's quickly look at this,
see if there's any updates that might be
relevant.
That's interesting.
When we the bill passed by the house
is reported to be a 100 and 1,116
pages long, but it says the complete
novel, so I guess that doesn't make sense.
It's cur I did I just randomly saw
this.
I don't know why they think that's relevant.
So maybe I missed something. But, anyway, the
point is, because Elon responded to it, just
a quick look and see if there's anything
that he posted that might be relevant.
I'm not seeing anything especially new.
Look at this. Elon's stance is principled. Trump's
stance is practical. Tech needs Republicans for present.
Republicans need tech for future. Drop the tax
cuts, some pork, get their you know, everyone's
trying to act like nothing's going on. Everyone's
fine. They can work it out.
Look at this. Trump party with Epstein and
Elon
Musk. Post a little little face.
Now if I can tell, there hasn't been
much after the ones I saw already. So
we'll leave it there.
Alex Jones, of course, jumps in and says,
the world stands on the brink of total
destruction
because of this Epstein point.
I guess I guess he forgot to type
World War three. That's his that's usual stick
right there. World War three.
I just think it's funny. I mean, the
idea that that's what you state, the world
state I mean,
look. There's clear examples of how but if
you've been saying that for five years, it's
just funny to point out. The idea is
that this is a big deal, and your
response is to say it's the world's collapsing
because Elon Musk's fighting with Donald Trump. Just
it really does show you where their minds
are at, guys. And this even makes that
oh, wait. This was
oh, I think there's one more up here.
Yeah. It's right here. I'll jump to it
real quick. I think
yeah. Right there.
I'll come back to this as well, but
it's about the Palantir point. And Alex Jones
talking about Palantir, which we'll play in a
And this guy says, Alex, please stop cheerleading
for Trump as though he can do no
wrong. And Alex says, who do you cheerlead
for?
I said, well, that's that's a very telling
response. So I I guess, do we just
have to pick a cheerleader or someone to
cheerlead for? I found that interesting. But I
wanted to grab this real quick. I haven't
watched this yet. I saw that while I
was waiting. And let's see what, James Lee
had to say about this. He goes, this
is going to be very popular to say
on this app, but Elon Musk is not
to be trusted.
But the only way to know for sure
the truth is to release the files.
Interesting. Let's see what he has to say.
I tend to see his reports as pretty
you know, I I I like the word
he comes from on in most things he
does.
Well, I thought I grabbed it already. Let
me grab that real quick.
And the point is that I think he's
gonna hint at the fact that he Trump
is likely on that. He's on I mean,
the information
highly suggest that that's the case. That Donald
Trump is he is very much a part
of that whole thing like all of them
seem to be. And that's the point is
anybody who's, you know, objective and nonpartisan can
very easily, you know, consider that very real
possibility. Here's what he had to say. I
know. Again, I haven't heard this yet. So
let's see what he has to say. Either
one to say it, but this is not
the bombshell that Elon and everybody else thinks
it is. Hey. Come on. Trump is a
100% in the Epstein files. I thought that
We all know this already. Yeah. It's already
been widely reported that Trump allegedly was good
friends with Epstein, so, of course, his name
is going to be in the files. In
fact, Trump's own attorney general already told us
that Trump is named in Epstein's flight logs.
So the real question isn't whether he's in
the files or not. It's did he commit
a crime? I mean, you don't think if
Trump was actually implicated in anything illegal, the
Democrats wouldn't have just released these files years
ago. Very good point. Right? Except though if
you think about the reality of that they're
not really fighting.
Now I still say it's a good point
because there are plenty of people that I
think would act in immediate interests out of
just hatred for Trump or but maybe they
didn't have access to it. But the point
is, that's a good point to make. However,
from my perspective,
it is the uni party, which he largely
agrees with. Right? The idea that we're dealing
with one apparat one, you know, government entity
that is really dictating these things for that
government's interest. And you wouldn't want that to
be exposed even if it's just to go
after Trump because they're all part of the
same agenda.
That's what I would argue, but it's a
good point to bring up. Now in terms
of actual evidence that's kind of out there,
according to investigative journalist George Webb, he claims
that Trump used to go to these Epstein
parties with his dates, and he would get
his photo taken by a photographer, and then
he would bounce before
halftime, quote, unquote. Trump is in the Epstein
files. That's what
the big bomb is that Elon's dropping. We've
said that he kept would come to the
beginning part of the party, then the things
would start unraveling where the suggestions were being
made at halftime, then Trump would leave. We
have witnesses to the facts. So, technically, Elon
is correct, but
it's misleading. Trump left
at the halfway point in all these parties.
We have So it could be simply that
Elon is making trying to maybe, you know,
maybe there's a little feud because that does
make sense to me that these people, their
egos are too big. And though he uses
something as a sort of a scare you
know, like Elon's been doing the entire time,
lying about Venezuela, lying about Haiti, lying about
South Africa, you know, using nuggets of truth.
And so in this case, using something that
he knows is gonna make Trump upset, but
maybe not ultimately put him in jail. Like,
that's a interesting point to make, and I
think that makes sense. Witnesses to the fact.
This is, of course, all alleged, and really
the only way to know for sure is
to release the files. Come on, Donald. Do
it. He won't do it.
I I I that my my opinion would
be very much so that that will not
happen because that is far bigger than just
Kim revealing that he's not there. And on
top of that, just the fact that his
name is there, regardless of whether it proves
any crime, you know that would go crazy.
People are gonna make I mean, and rightly
so, it should concern us because it could
mean that. But people will just point and
say, there's his name and we knew it,
you know, that kind of thing.
I don't think for a they'll allow that.
They've already set themselves up to fail. If
they if they do it now, it's it's
only gonna cause us to be worse, in
my opinion. So I think they're committed.
But he's right. That would be the only
way to truly prove this.
So there's also people, by the way, that
are still actively trying to maintain the the
well, I I wanna grab that meme. I'll
throw I think I have a video play,
and I'll grab that the whole you know,
this is fine with the fire. I just
think it's exactly what's happening right now. Well,
this, I I thought was an interesting verse.
I wrote, how embarrassing. So in other words,
you know, trust the plan? And I came
back to this, and it says this. The
post is unavailable.
I'm thinking, what? They delete it? No. It's
still there.
As you could see.
But I just wanna show you how interesting
this happens to a lot of us on
this platform. There's my comment.
That it if you come at it from
my comment perspective,
it doesn't let you see what I responded
to. Why is that? Because I think it's
about suppressing
this kind of sentiment, and that's just one
along of many different things. It's not just
me or just what we do, but it
is happening on this platform.
So the point
was he wrote, I know it looks a
little ugly now, and this was this is
literally today.
The tariffs battles, the court battles, the deportation
battles, the legislation battles, the deep state backstabbing
inter agencies.
Everybody else's fault.
That's politics in a constitutional republic. Yep. Are
are you really are you seriously pretending we
exist in a constitutional republic? Are you that
I just god. That's so crazy to me.
But they play they aim at the lowest
common denominator. They are going for the most
ignorant,
following it whatever emotional trap they said.
We should be a constitutional republic. We have
not been for a very long time. But
he goes that he goes, that's politics in
a constitutional republic that was rotted from within
for decades.
Right.
Not not like we reality is clearly you
could argue from day one arguably that we
didn't actually have that, but the reality being
for a long time. But it says, but
anyone with a functioning brain can see how
this is going to transform America in less
than a year, in a good way, he's
saying, that this is good. But by next
summer, America will be almost unrecognizable compared to
what it was a year ago. The border
will be almost complete. Our national coffers will
be filled with hundreds of billions of dollars
from tariffs. That's so insultingly not true. History
will show you that. But that's what they
want you to think. Just wait. It'll all
work out. Americans will be paying the lowest
taxes of their lives. Are you kidding me?
There will be millions of fewer illegal aliens.
Crime will be at record lows, and the
economy will be booming with all these new
manufacturing jobs that will not come because that's
not how this is gonna work out. History
will show you that whether they outsource
every time they can, but it says
that brought back from overseas,
rough seas will now lead to calm seas
later.
That's a weird thing to write. And just
in time for midterms. Stay the course. And
I said, how embarrassing. So in other words,
ignore what it looks and feels like and
trust the plan?
Well, yeah. That's exactly what that says.
It'll all work out.
Even though I know that, like, their tariffs
right now are increasing all the costs and,
ultimately, it's spinning out out into bigger economic
wars.
But just keep doing it, and it'll end
up back in your pocket? Explain that for
me. Like, there's
it's
listen to Catherine Austin Fitts or other people
that actually know what they're talking about when
it comes to way this works, and they'd
laugh at this person like you should.
Now here's Kat Turd saying, I laugh at
the fake news. This is today. I laugh
at the fake news articles that MAGA is
splintering.
MAGA never changes.
Depends
on what you're talking about when you say
that. And he says, we always stick together
with Trump against all challengers.
Yeah.
That's what I've been saying.
Facts don't matter.
Sy, you you stick with Trump no matter
what. I mean, he's he's that he's proudly
saying that because that's the reality.
The point is, I'm not trying to say,
like, yay. They're breaking. My point is you
can see that partisanship
left and right is splintering, falling apart. That
that's the reality because people are becoming aware
of the larger play. And these
dinosaurs,
however old they are, the idea of what
this account does, these are dwindling, guys. People
can see through it.
I know you see it. My my fun
the thing is let me just see if
I can grab that.
Yeah.
I just love that.
So for the podcast, I post that meme
underneath, which is this is fine.
That's what he's doing right now. And same
with DC Draino. I should have put it
there too. But the point
is people are breaking away of that. Now
right now, you could publicly see it. He
post this on the day where he knows
it's happening for that reason, in my opinion.
That people are suddenly going, damn. Trump you
know, Trump's the problem because Elon was trying
to save the planet or that Elon's the
problem because Trump's our guy, and they're breaking
down the middle. That is the MAGA movement.
I get it's right now. It's not maybe
I don't I can't speak to the percentages,
but you all see it too. My point
is that's not unique to the right.
I saw similar things during COVID nineteen for
the left. I see it kinda happening now
too because people are waking up to all
of this. They're still struggling with the fact
that Biden continued to fund a genocide their
entire four years. It's it's clearly changing. He
says the influencers
now that are going against Trump are the
same never Trump accounts that supported DeSantis and
Nikki Haley in the primary?
I mean, what so you're telling us the
people that have been supporting Trump are now
breaking away from Trump. How does that not
show you? His point is they were never
really on our side. Well, that's sure a
lazy, self fulfilling argument. He goes, the Republicans
in congress who are coming out against him
are the same Never Trumpers. Same point.
Very lazy. Some people, though,
chief Trumpster,
pretty about a a 100,000 followers. He says,
we're cooked.
And points out that Palantir wrote on the
set on October 2023,
certain kinds of evil
can only be fought with force.
Palantir stands with Israel.
And he says, we're cooked.
Yeah. Some people have the integrity enough to
point it out when they recognize the problem.
Hodge twins, they play it down the middle.
I think they're very grifty in this. But
here, they point they go, oh, we're how
we are why are Republicans giving Palantir all
this power?
Turning us into a damn police state.
I agree. I'll read this from WikiLeaks in
a minute.
But Jane Ruby says because there is no
republican or democrat. Come on. You guys can't
be that dumb. My point is that's they
can't leave that. The two party illusion,
that's their whole thing. And it's not them.
It's anybody that's been doing this in that
field. You can't go away from that because
that's your whole base.
So it's important for him to call it
out because as we keep showing you, you
can't be like cat turd. Everyone sees that
we all see this, and he's trying to
tow that line where everything's fine. He they
most people have to go, yeah. That's a
problem. Why is it happening? Because they know
everyone sees it.
But you still hold that line, the two
party illusion,
until it turns out, oh, it was a
Democrat's plan. There was a holdover in the
deep state from the from the Democrats or
whatever whatever in the whole deep state. The
point is it's always something that makes it
all continue, and it's just a bad apple.
Now here is what
Jones had to say about Palantir, and let's
roll this over into the Palantir point. Now
it goes both ways. We're talking about the
AI FDA COVID Palantir direction because they're involved
in that too. We're talking about the Panopticon
surveillance state or rather the Panopticon
surveillance, immigration, and that's Palantir. That's Boundary. That's
Israel. It's right on top of you right
now. And here is how Alex Jones responded
to this. And we talked about this in
the name wake up. I'll read you what
David said. He said, just seeing this, Alex.
So embarrassing.
It's easy to say, but you can't say
it. Palantir is a deep state company seed
funded by the CIA
and headed to by two deep state operatives.
Teal and Karp on the steering committee of
the Bilderberg group, and Trump is in bed
with them because he is deep state too
and always has been.
There. See? Easy. Now whether you agree with
that framing or not or what the meaning
of the deep state is, which I agree.
I think it's abstract. The point is to
recognize what Jones is doing here
even I mean, as he starts with this,
everyone's reaching out to me. A Palantir, a
Palantir. His audience
sees it because it's stacked with people that
are also watching our shows and everything else
and are aware and are getting uncomfortable with
how this keeps going, or just people that
know it and go, why aren't you talking
about it? So his audience is going, why
are you talking about Palantir? This is his
response.
He's asking me about Palantir Palantir.
And when you look at it and you
understand it,
Palantir
and the surveillance systems and the AI and
all of it has been an outlier
from the bigger companies.
And it's been wanting to get big contracts,
and Trump wants to use it to track
illegal aliens and stuff and the real ID
that they're trying to bring in that that's
terrible.
But completely supported by Trump and everybody else,
but it's bad. You know?
That never got implemented because it's it's unconstitutional,
so I've been critical. Oh, is that the
case? It never got implemented, but it's currently
now required?
Keep keep misinforming everybody.
Love all of that. And I obviously don't
trust Palantir and the rest of the stuff
it's doing. Oh, you're so brave. But now
but now distract it and say it's not
a big deal.
But it is small
compared to all the other big AI and
the Pentagon, Sentinel, and all the rest of
it. Wow. So you're telling me that one
company that now has access to every single
database in this country that's currently building a
database of all American information, that currently has
contracts with multiple global entities, currently building out
and or, you know, conducting a genocide using
AI target information. I mean, it's insane to
try to make that argument.
It is counter to reality. On top of
that, remember the point we made about Palantir
trying to frame it itself as the small
entities? Remember that they're trying to say we're
partnering with the small what do they call
them? The startup tech or whatever. Remember the
when we talked about that? And I laughed
at that going, how dumb is that? They're
trying to frame themselves. Well, either he fell
for that or he knows the talking points.
Palantir
is the central issue right now in regard
to surveillance, in regard to artificial intelligence. It's
on the surface, and that's why even his
audience can see that. And he is doing
everything he can to downplay that.
Just make sure you understand that. The reason
you're seeing the attacks on it everywhere
is because it's trying to get contracts
that other big tech companies already have
and be Oh, but you mean have them,
though. Right, Alex?
Already have all of them?
Or are you just not doing your due
diligence?
Because Palantir has been supportive of Trump. And
so, yeah, Trump is going to them
because they've been supporters.
But all this hype about Palantir, it it
all of these systems can be used for
control.
All these systems are out of control. Oh,
so it's no big deal then. It's already
going on, so who cares. Right? Well, let's
add another behemoth of a control structure because
they already exist.
That's not a that's not a logical argument
at all. All the AIs are woke. Oh,
it's woke now. Well, yeah. In fact, left
and right, you understand. It's about censorship based
on hate speech, sent you know,
identity politics, canceled culture, left and right. But
he wants you to think democrat. Yes. So
so Palantir is being used
to run AI drones, killing people in Gaza.
And Ukraine, see, he casually leaves that out
because he doesn't want you to think that.
We made that point. Actually, I forgot to
make that point in the Ukraine Russia point.
Anduril supplies the drones. Palantir supplies the tech.
So the drones that they're using, that he's
telling you NATO's trying to sabotage Trump's peace
plan are being provided by the group that's
puppeteering the current administration.
All of it's very concerning.
But why do people know about Palantir and
nothing else? Well, that's because it comes from
the left.
Okay. So it's just the democrats.
Think about how stupid that is to say,
while it's literally immersed in Trump's administration, while
it is not small, while it already has
the contracts he claims or what, it is
all a very lazy construct. And that's why,
David and plenty of others said this is
embarrassing. I mean, if if the only people
that are gobbling this up, people that are
or just wanna support him and will take
whatever narrative because they're watching reality TV. If
you care about facts and you do your
investigation, you have any symbol to due diligence
or you do any,
this is wrong. It's just patently false.
Only focusing on Palantir
because it's seen as something being brought in
to surveil the government itself and to try
to find ways for other use. That's what
Trump wants it for. Okay. So Palantir's only
gonna look at the government,
except they just told you about the building
of database of American information. And Elon, Doge,
and Palantir were using that to train their
AI models with Social Security, with GSA, with,
the IRS. I mean, every one of them
broke down the silent information and jammed it
together, which is a very big security risk.
And they've already been public about that so
they could access your information. So that's already
happening, you understand. They've already done that. They're
already doing that. And the argument is it's
to surveil the government?
So how do you explain the scooping up
of every piece of information of Americans, Alex?
Or did you just not see that part?
Trump admin tasked Palantir with expanding US surveillance
state. And the New York Times and all
of them are all over Palantir's
deepening government ties sparked fears of centralized
surveillance.
And you've got the owner of it, the
CEO of it He's using his own article,
by the way. The source material is his
article of Infowars. A picture of it, though,
you know, in, Twitter files and all that.
All his statements about crushing the right wing
in Europe and all the rest of it.
I got serious concerns. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, see
how briefly he touches on the fact that
Karp says to cry he crushed the right
the the alt right or the what do
they call it? The the extreme right or
whatever you called it in Europe. I mean,
we're very concerned. Very concerned. It's like saying,
Trump might be the devil, but I don't
know, and then going on to support him
for five years. Like, that's what continues to
happen. And that thing he said with half
a second barely on his breath, if it
comes true, he'll say he was right. That's
how this works. It's just
that endless hyping about it and only focusing
on it. Wow. Is coming out of the
left and It simply is
not. I mean, there the the people who
actually have been screaming about this for a
long time before it even entered the two
party illusion has been people that call out
the whole thing, and they know that. That's
why they attacked us so much before the
selection process because we were reaching people with
the idea that you were being lied to
with the fake
the false binary.
We have been calling this out for a
very long time. And well before me, Whitney,
Derek,
screening about this. Not just Palantir, but where
it developed. James Corbett for a lot of
people. And as Palantir stepped into the fold,
Whitney's been writing about this well before it
overlapped with Trump. Now it comes into play
even more so. The last administration threw Biden's
right now. So So explain for me how
it's a left thing when every administration left
or right continues to hand off the baton.
See, facts don't come into play for this
kind of conversation.
The populist anti globalist movement
has taken it absolutely
hook, line, and sinker.
Well, that's embarrassing. I agree with David.
Now 12 simply points out, I cannot wait
until the inevitable revelation that Teal has bankrolled
Alex for the past decade,
which certainly would make sense.
Yeah. The the video is literally entitled Alex
Jones responds to Palantir Hysteria.
That's his response.
And, again,
they're attacking him for
cheerleading
for Trump and Palantir, and he goes, well,
who are you cheerleading for?
Don't look. Derek says, how about the peep
how about the free people? The awakening of
humanity? S h I t. Even the statist
constitution will be useful.
Exactly. Now Spike Cohen has a really breaking
through comment right now. Right? So he's he's
calling out the the current rather, you know,
basically saying, you know, we were good. Right?
Because
Kamala and the rest of them would have
ruined everything.
So thank god Trump and everything is here.
Right? He says, it's a good thing that
Harris didn't win, didn't get elected. Because by
now, as we were told over and over,
she would have introduced the most expensive budget
ever, of course, raised taxes on everything,
destroyed Elon Musk's plans to cut the government
waste, then probably even hire Palantir to spy
on every American even closer.
Gosh. What a relief.
All we could hope for is that the
courts would stop her. Right?
Boy, would she hate that. Progressives detest constitutional
limitations.
In case you missed the point,
he's very, very perfectly highlighting. By the way,
most of which was actually stated.
Everything he listed is currently happening under Trump's
administration,
oh, and including the idea of the court
if the courts are trying to stop Kamala
Harris from doing things that we saw as
a constitutional, oh, man. They'd be screaming go
for it no matter what. You wouldn't even
hear the argument of
executive power or the the reality is just
like it's happening today. It is the way
the system is supposed to work.
He's simply correctly pointing out the hypocrisy and
the partisanship.
Now Marjorie Taylor Greene, in regard to this
bill,
came out and said, I read it oh,
of all, excuse me. Massey,
on the fifth, says the big beautiful bill
contains a provision banning state and local government
from regulating AI. It's funny that they're posting
this out on the fifth even though a
lot of us were pointing this out before
this even came to pass.
And he says and it also, by the
way, doesn't just make it illegal for ten
years,
which is, again, the most insane thing I
could even make up. The idea that we're
in the middle of what's happening
with with the way AI is developing, that
you're gonna allow ten years
of no regulation, no oversight from the companies,
like, not government Silicon Valley and the people
developing this is lunacy.
I can't believe that's even the reality. But
on top of that, it makes clear that
they're gonna develop AI
decision making processes and AI regulation for the
government entities,
turning it into government AI. Guys, that's what
they're doing.
And he said it would make it easier
for corporations to get zoning variances so massive
AI data centers could be built in close
proximity to residential areas.
Now
Marjorie says, I read it worse than that.
Remember, she voted for this.
I'm not voting for the development of Skynet
and the rise of the machines. Clearly, somebody
told her what they thought about it. By
destroying federalism for ten years, by taking away
state rights to regulate it, make okay. Then
why did you vote for it, Marjorie?
Forcing an imminent domain on people's private properties
to link future Skynet is not very Republican.
Then why did you vote for it, Marjorie?
Also, AI is going to replace fast arrays
of human jobs. You yep. Yeah. Where were
you a ago? That means in my manufacturing
just so here's my take on this. She
goes on and on and on. Same thing.
She either very well knew that, which is
where I'm leaning, and is now just trying
to play both sides. I voted for it,
but I missed it. So she's using the
fact that she's stupid or didn't do her
job
and knowingly making that without saying it directly,
but that's the way you interpret this. She
didn't read the bill. Right?
So either one of those are the case,
and she's willing to make herself look that
way in order to now go out on
your side.
Like I say, that's opportunism. They're taking advantage
of what they know we see.
Now I'll lean into that. I'm not gonna
ever support people like this, but I will
still show that and say that that's what
we think. Yes. That's a problem. Right? Lean
into that to at least drive other opportunists
to start calling out the right thing. See
what I'm point? See what I'm saying? And
don't blindly trust any of them. The point
is that they did not read this
or or rather they're pretending they didn't, which
either way, I I think the reality is
most of them really don't read these things.
My point is that she's on that side
either way. They're on this side. They were
they were gonna vote for it regardless of
what it said is my point. They didn't
read it, and they would have voted either
way. Now they're trying to make it look
like we're I'm with Massey because they know
that most people want that. But the main
point is, guys, everyone out there voting for
this, and this is what Massey and Paul
and plenty of others have called out, they
don't even read these things. They vote on
party lines.
Here's The Guardian, Marjorie Taylor Greene, criticized for
not reading the bill.
Just it's it's so dangerous where we know
we are, and we're still driven by partisan
screamers.
So as that bill that's passed is talking
about ten years of no oversight, no regulation,
automating government systems all across the board,
well, let's consider the Palantir Panopticon that is
being built around us right now, which is
what Jones and the rest are trying to
do anything they can to make you look
away from it.
So Max Jones, for Whitney's website, wrote the
CDC, Palantir, and the AI Healthcare Revolution.
The CDC's Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics,
the CFA, has partnered with Palantir
to cement the public private model of invasive
surveillance in public health. You see, we're all
talking about the other aspects. Well, we've already
forgotten that this was already happening. This was
January 13,
all while pushing The US national security state,
they write, and Silicon Valley even closer together.
So this is the current discussion about the
basic the actual panopticon of our our surveillance
and data from Palantir. This is before that,
and this is about health.
That just added to the bigger picture. Right?
Hold on one second.
This starts and it's it's really fascinating to
go back. It starts, in
1996
with Netanyahu who wrote a book called Fighting,
Terrorism.
And the
Sorry. I'll just tell you what I did
right there so you know, because it's just
so abrupt. I saw a spider on the
wall, and I would have lost I wouldn't
have been able to have been comfortable knowing
it was over there if I let it
go. So now we've got that out of
the way. So back to the point.
Health
AI health care revolution.
Okay? So keeping that in mind, this is,
the the this is today.
Teletracking
Palantir partner for health care AI solutions.
Right now, this is just about the AI
health overlap. Okay? And so that was happening
in January. Now you even see the teletracking
Palantir partner overlap for AI solutions. So not
only is this about AI direct created medicine,
that's part of it, but it's about tracking,
it's about surveillance, it's about,
what's, like, the digital twin kind of data
collection dynamic or even predictive programming or rather
predictive,
medical, you know, deciding whether there'll be a
pow an outbreak next week. The the, what's
what I'm looking for? Medical precrime, as Whitney
and I have talked about a lot.
It's all happening. And my point is to
show you that every angle of this is
being controlled by the group that Jones wants
you to think is some small thing that
no one's paying attention. Oh, they're overhyping it
because the left.
It's just I I don't I mean, it
makes you wonder why he'd be willing to
say something so bombastically false when you know
you can look.
Want you you you there's plenty of possibilities.
Consider that.
Now, the FDA
today
names the ever AI chief. I I mean,
we've been telling you this is coming. So
now the FDA is using AI to develop
drugs and to go through regulatory tests.
Brooke Jackson's been calling this out for a
long time. Here, this is under RFK's HHS.
Following my very successful pilot program with FDA's
scientific reviewers, that's what it's we're talking about
reviewing scientific or rather, you know, studies.
Testing safety and efficacy, that's what we're talking
about. He goes, I set an aggressive timeline
to scale. Oh, so we want that. Right?
We want an aggressive, fast timeline for this
testing? How about we test it properly? How
about that?
To scale AI agency wide.
Agency wide. So how long until the FDA
is just a computer program telling you what
they want you to think?
Today's rollout of ELSA is ahead of schedule
and under budget, thanks to the collaboration of
our in house expert experts. They're talking about
AI
FDA.
So Kennedy tags that and says, this is
a revolution in public health. We're building a
faster, smarter, and more accountable HHS to make
America healthy again. Thank you, mccar doctor McCarrie,
for your leadership in driving this transformational
char char change. Excuse me.
It's AI anything. AI everything. That's the point.
No matter how you rationalize it, that's what's
happening right now. And as five times August
points out, just pull the COVID shots already.
Jeez.
There's no such thing as public health. It's
personal, not collective. Right? All these these are
a lot of people that support the Maha
movement. And and some of them pretty prominent,
simply going, why are you doing it? Look,
the FDA falls under your chart. Does it
not? FDA approves Moderna's new vaccine. We just
talked about that. The mSpike, whatever it's called,
or the self amplifying one. All this is
real time happening.
And here's what rich people weekly pointed out.
He says,
the suggestion is that ten million plus children
a year need gene therapy.
That's alarming.
And he has the clip right down here
where the basically just goes over the reality.
Just I I think it's good that you
could it's only
yeah. Oh, I think it's I think I
got it. Yeah. I do. I'm sorry. I
thought I hadn't downloaded it. I was gonna
say, yeah. We'll come back to it. It's
right here. It's a little short part of
the clip.
Yeah. These medical achievements are not just scientific
milestones.
They also underscore a huge need and a
historic opportunity for FDA,
for HHS, and for this country.
Each year, ten million babies are born with
one of about ten thousand
known rare genetic diseases, many of which are,
in principle, now treated with genetic medicines.
In principle, meaning the majority are now treated
with genetic medicines. And the whole point is
they're rolling us into this direction, which we
all don't want. Gee that's gym genetic. That
is mRNA shots. Genetically modified anything right now,
people. I mean, the GMO food push,
it failed in a spectacular fashion.
And yet we just let Gates, the rest,
roll it into vaccines, apparently. It's the same
general conversation. We're talking about genetic modification.
And now they're doing it to hurt you.
I mean, let's be let's be real about
what these shots are doing. And Brooke has
been calling this out. This is Bakari talking
about the how AI was used to assist
with their scientific product review. And as Brooks
says, Pfizer slashed its COVID clinical trial review
down to twenty two hours
using
AI. FDA turned the other cheek and said,
hold my algorithm cranking out in six minutes.
Great. So AI can just say like, if
they're already giving you things that are deadly,
I just
FDA now they have a six minute process
where the AI says we're all good, and
they do whatever they're gonna do anyway.
Kennedy says, I want to address those of
you who have anxieties about the FDA's
limited approval of a new COVID shot. It
was for over 65 and anybody,
it was it was a shot for over
65 and, I think, children. And there's many
other shots in general.
And it says Moderna has agreed to true
placebo controlled trial of the new vaccine.
Okay. Well, thus not forget, the m next
spike one didn't have placebo control, and that's
already out.
Now what's important is to recognize that if
they're using AI, that's Brooks' whole point, that
that is exactly how they can manipulate the
data. On top of that in general,
why would we trust Moderna or Pfizer's data?
Haven't we been through this?
But that's what they would do. That's what
Brooke keeps pointing out. That's why Ventavia and
Pfizer in general with this with her what
she whistle blowed on in regard to the
lie
because they simply took that data and and
then then, you know, look through it, but
you're taking their data at face value moving
forward. You have to they they've been caught
lying more times than anybody in this conversation.
But he's simply saying Moderna is gonna test
it now. Well, they did last time, and
you guys went along with it. But it
says, which is similar to the existing mRNA
vaccine, but uses smaller protein.
Yeah. We know that.
The FDA will monitor and collect data throughout
the trial for every adverse outcome, not just
a table list of expected outcomes. FDA will
scrutinize every aspect of the trial. We will
deliver a you get the trial data they
give you. You see? You're still stepping in
from what they present you, and that's the
choke point. It says we will deliver on
our promise to use gold standard science and
common sense. Okay.
Well, doctor Henry Eli makes this very clear.
He goes, okay. I'll bite. How do you
approve anything before
a clinical trial is completed?
The placebo ain't the issue. The issue is
approving mRNA at all. You're supposed to be
banning them
and realize they just approved a new shot
without placebo. I just talked about this. In
fact,
sure I can get it to come up.
Right here.
Oh, and this is actually good. I'll include
it in the show because this is the
one where we we discovered we discussed the
new oh, I think it's right here anyway.
Yeah. Right there. Alright. It's already in there
anyway. But the point was, in this discussion,
FDA's
FDA approves new m r mRNA COVID shot
using vaccine placebo.
Hold on. Is that that's weird. Okay. I
gotta come back to that. The bottom line
is the the point was did not have
it was a it was not a placebo.
It was
a compare oh, no. Okay. That's right. I'm
just confusing myself with the way I wrote
that. I guess I I guess that now
does seem kinda confusing. The point is they
used a vaccine
as the placebo.
They used the older mRNA shot to compare
to the new shot, which is what we
called out in the past. Now, yes, it's
specifically for safety trials where you really need
the placebo, but they didn't do a placebo
test on this in any context. I may
I verified this for myself.
Bottom line, guys, that's exactly what Eli's calling
out. So you can't they're they're just we're
being played.
I I think it's very clear. Doctor Robin
Menotti points out, it's a mystery.
Doctors are rebaffled.
I was at I thought this was the
old this is not an old one. This
is posted 05/30/2025.
Doctors sound alarm over massive spike in Americans
suddenly dropping dead from unexplained heart attacks.
That I mean, it's also it's kinda concerning
that they that comes back up. You wonder
what's coming next. You know, the bottom line
is that we know a huge part of
what that is today.
Not that I know everything or that we
know that what what explains all of it
or what's the culprit behind all of it,
but we know.
Peer reviewed science, guys, that is being caused
by these shots, clearly.
And we were trying to ring that bell
in 2021
and got called crazy and conspiracy theorists. And
even then still, it didn't even now, it
still doesn't seem to be we don't acknowledge
the collapsing athletes and how how, I mean,
vivid that was.
It was so obvious to see. And it
wasn't just athletes, but that was an easy
way to compare. We did the FIFA study.
We did the
the the two main studies that showed you
that we were wildly above the average.
Way, way, way, like, five, ten times above
the average for a year. I proved that
in 2021 using science. Of course, we're not
allowed to break through in these conversations for
an obvious reason. The point is that we
know this.
But, yeah, they're rebaffled. I love that.
Doctor Henry Eli says, and this is a
different part of this. So, beyond the COVID
shot point, he says also under secretary Kennedy's
watch,
But it's The U a USDA, doctor h.
His point is they keep trying to sidestep
it. It's his HHS, which every one of
these things are under that umbrella.
Because, yeah, but the bioweapons are only made
possible by the FDA, which is under the
HHS.
He says, take out the problem at the
source and all this goes away. Vaccines and
glyphosate protected. Organic under attack. Five d chess
with a sideways face.
Jim Ferguson says, organic isn't safe anymore. USDA
opens the door to genetic engineering, which we
talked about. Right? We just talked about this.
The pig the
CRISPR gene pig conversation.
They're they're using pork made by CRISPR and
and this isn't that fake meat? Isn't that
exactly what we're worried about under Bill Gates?
Under the Biden ministry? Yes. But now it's
okay because HHS because RFK, apparently.
It's just blind hypocrisy, guys. And the reality
is this is happening, and he's right.
And here's an example of this. ChatGPT designed
insect
insecticidal
NGT
plants.
05/27/2025.
Now again, this is EU. My point is,
this is happening around the world. But this
is it's expanding. And realize that, like we
talked about with the,
insect allies point,
that this kind of stuff is used and
it becomes it's outside of their control.
Adopted plants obtained from new genetic engineering
with up to 20 genetic changes to be
placed on the market without having to undergo
environmental risk assessments for food or food labeling.
That's happening in this country too.
We just saw in Tennessee where they tried
to pass the bill that said if there
are vaccines inside of food that has to
be labeled and they act like, well, what
is that happening? It's like, that's not the
point. It's about the fact that we see
it on the wall. The right it's coming.
They're telling you that's making
not just vaccines inside of food, but any
number of things. They've been trying to work
on making I think they have done it,
by the way, many more times than we
can see. Like,
whether it's on the market or not is
the question, but antidepressants, for example, in
vegetables or anything. It's about creating organic material
that has things already present that are pharmaceutical.
That has been going on for a long
time. It's not some big crazy conspiracy. You
could look it up. It's actually pretty prominent.
The point is that now there it's becoming
a very
in your face part of the story
to the point where they're passing bills that
say we don't have to label it. We
don't even put risk on it.
You know why this is happening.
Here is an example in this country, and
this is an overlap point. It's not directly
connected, but I just wanna include it somewhere.
Federal bill that would ban hemp
THC,
which by the way is I mean,
hemp is the point. And THC being waived,
like, it's it's like point o three. It's
very, very small.
It's it's considered nonpsychoactive
hemp.
Nationwide. Banned nationwide passed by the house committee.
I just wanna continue to show you how
broken this is. This partisan game, they're now
trying to ban something that is not is
nonpsychoactive
just because it is something that they I
think it's honestly because of hemp and and
corporate interests. Either way, it it
pharmaceuticals,
textiles,
everything you could imagine, hemp can produce something
better, long longer lasting and more beneficial.
But they're gonna try to pass something to
stop that. It just shows you where we're
going, guys. And they none of them are
on your side.
And on that note and I'm my point
is that's under the current administration. You yes.
Historically, Republicans have always pushed back against cannabis,
but this is supposed to be the make
America healthy again discussion.
And if you all well know what that
means, that means actual cannabinoids.
But aside from people that wanna push back
on that, it's just it's
insane that we can't have an honest conversation
about how wildly medicinal and beneficial not smoking
cannabis is you know, smoking a marijuana is,
which there is points to make about that,
but specifically the natural sense of, let's take
taking the plant and eating it. Put it
in a shake and grind it up and
drink it. You see, that's all we gotta
make that case for you because they all
you just wanna smoke weed. Well, yeah. I
do exact. But that's not the point. The
point is the medicinal purposes of this without
any of that.
Just the plants itself has profound impacts on
your body. Your body has an endocannabinoid
system
specifically designed for things from the cannabinoid plant.
Look, there's cannabinoids in general from a cannabis
plant. So my point is, you don't have
can in its receptors for everything you put
in your body. All it shows is your
body is designed
to work with that. Your
breast women's breast milk has natural cannabinoids.
There's a reason that it's just it's so
we have been broken because this thing has
been pulled away from us. Now bottom line,
again, that's why I wanna get into it.
There's so many ways that it's important conversation,
and still people will push back. Shannon Joy
put this out, an open letter to RFK.
Proud to stand, she writes with Naomi Wolf.
This was
oh, this is Mary Talley Bowden. It's MD
breath is her the tag. And Sasha Latapova
as a coauthor of this open letter to
Robert Kennedy junior
and doctor McCary. It says, dear HHS secretary
Kennedy and McCary,
FDA commissioner.
We are writing this letter, this open letter,
to express deep concerns about recent policies emerging
from HHS,
the CDC,
and the FDA,
specifically,
the omission
of the dangerous mRNA injections that the re
that the recently released Maha report
and the reaffirmation of the CDC's recommendations for
mRNA injections.
They deliberately left out the many mRNA directions
out of the Maha report, which stood out
to people like this.
Removal of the mRNA platform from the market
is one of the main goals of the
grassroots Maha movement.
Millions of concerned parents set aside partisan differences
and identities to embrace
the historic MAGA Maha alliance, which was the
point we made at the time.
That it was an effort to get people
who wouldn't otherwise vote for Trump to come
over to vote for Trump. Now that's in
the argument that you think these votes translate.
I don't.
But it's about momentum. It's about the the
appearance
of having that man that that clearly matters.
But it says instead of policy action on
these key issues, we, the undersigned, along with
many other citizens,
see a set of distractions,
linguistic misdirections,
and watered down policy announcements that avoid
taking serious action on the deadly mRNA injections.
And I'll add on a lot of other
topics too.
Says contrary to what doctor McCary recently stated,
we do not need more data to establish
whether the mRNA platform should should or should
not be recommended, and anybody paying attention knows
that already. RFK Jr said that before he
came into power.
If they say the data are in
from many credible sources, including peer reviewed science
today, guys, including new oh, that sorry. I
was there. Including numerous peer reviewed studies publications,
the analysis of the Pfizer documents released
via Aaron Series lawsuits, which we've talked about,
VAERS and and v safe datasets,
and data produced by foreign governments.
The data show
catastrophic
levels of deaths and serious damage from the
mRNA injections,
as well as reproductive damage, including high miscarriage
rates.
We all know this. This is the reality.
They know that. That's my point. RFP junior
said that, and now he's not stopping it.
It says we do not need more studies
to pull the injections from the market.
You do not need congress nor another election.
You do not need a new mandate from
voters.
Your own appointments to HHS and FDA and
the election of president Trump and the MAGA
Maha alliance are the mandate. Indeed, your recent
world wordplay
about removing the mRNA injections from the from
being recommended to pregnant women and healthy children
appears misleading
vis a vis the actual policy changes published
by the FDA and CDC. And last I
checked, they didn't even update the actual schedule.
It still says to give them.
The published policies reversed the power
reserves, excuse me, the power to recommend them
for every child except the healthy. Most US
children, as you, Kennedy, have pointed out yourself,
have health issues. That was our point. And
health care encounters often involve a currently
currently sick child who may be labeled immunocompromised.
If a child has asthma or allergies,
prediabetes, or is overweight, has a damaged heart
or an impaired immune system, that child is
not healthy, yet that child will now be
targeted with an mRNA shot. It appears that
you are going to continue to recommend the
shots that now have an FDA warning for
heart damage to children with heart damage. That's
just it's insane. And recommend a shot that
damages the immune system to parents of children
whose immune systems are compromised. It's the same
point I made in the beginning. The people
that are historically, like,
refute that you're not allowed to take these
shots or be in trials because you're pregnant
or because you're immunocompromised
were the ones they tried to give it
to
It's things like that. This should have woken
up every person that's been doing this. Some
of them were honest, like doctor,
Bakhti
and all the doctor doctor they doctors we
talked about. They stood up and screened it,
and they still do.
But so many who knew didn't say a
word.
The new the new FDA COVID shot policy
claims to be evidence based. However, no evidence
was provided, and none exist to our knowledge
that supports statements that the categories of people
marked as vulnerable by the FDA would benefit
from these injections.
Conflating clearly established risk with automatically assumed benefit
for a product that is still legally a
poorly regulated,
liability free EUA countermeasure under Prep Act emergency
declaration
defies
scientific reason and common sense. And you know
why they say that? You know because you
watch this show. Because the FDA EUA overlapped
to these never went away. Regardless of whether
they say approved about this or not, that
still applies.
You stated the shots were removed from the
CDC recommendation for pregnant women, but pregnancy remains
listed as high risk.
This is how they play you guys. It
is especially troubling that the new version of
mRNA injections are recommended for all pregnant women
without this platform ever having been tested on,
say, pregnancy. I've been saying that from the
very beginning. I imagine joy has done too.
Shannon's been on this from the beginning. The
point is that these things were never tested,
with pregnant women, and yet they're recommended as
safe for pregnant women. They were never tested
alongside of the vaccines, yet they're recommended to
be taken along the flu shot.
It's this is not new. It just shows
you that the continued
problem is not partisan.
Both of them are both all your government
knows about this and doesn't care.
Especially troubling
that the new versions of mRNA injections are
recommended. That's what I just read. Lastly, there
is evidence of the removal of parental rights
to choose health treatment for their children
buried in the CDC's language, even for healthy
children, meaning that you don't get to decide
anymore.
We all saw that shift, acting like there's,
like, liability and we have it's not our
not your choice because we're liable. Doesn't matter,
guys. You make your health choices for your
family and yourself.
Legal challenges have proven that even though they're
still gonna push it push you into it
because they feel that they're more you know,
the kind of nurse doctor mindset we've seen
got got rid of all the ones that
integrity and principles, not the ones they're left
with or all the, you know,
megalomaniacs.
And it says even for healthy children, the
CDC insists on parents sharing the decision with
health care providers, including pharmacists who lack authority
to treat parents
Patients. Excuse me. By stating the decision to
inject a child with mRNA is a shared
decision, while routine injections are treated as the
default decision to inject, a dangerous legal precedent
is being set. Assigning powers to federal government
that have legally belonged to parents.
Important.
Glad they called this out.
Now
Thomas Massey
says doctor Birx is the worst type of
person that gets into government. A complete hypocrite,
holier than thou, telling lies cloaked in faux
science with the
how do you spell that? I didn't read
that earlier. Impromptu more? I what does that
stand for?
An official license by the Roman Catholic church.
Right? That's weird. I feel like I've heard
that. I'm a probably mispronouncing it. If you
say it out loud, then I will, oh,
that's that word.
Anyway, of the government legitimacy
and never held accountable.
So she will rinse and repeat.
The point,
she's a Palantir on the Palantir advisory
board. On top of many other points,
the idea that simply that she,
in Trump's administration,
and and, you know, overlapping what the point
is nonpartisan,
has continued to be a part of that
problem. It's lied about it. Was part of
the lockdowns and part of the choices and
then tried to call it out later. This
is what they do. Just like you see
Stephen Miller right now. Or not Stephen Miller,
Matt Miller.
Vampire. Right? We kept now acting like I
I always thought Israel was bad, and I
always knew they were breaking the law. I
just had to follow orders.
What I that's I that makes that's meaningless.
Matt, you are forever a genocide supporter, and
you stood there and smiled while they we
knew what was going on. I don't care
whether it's orders or not. You knew damn
well what you were doing. And the same
point applies to them. But overall, lying about
this,
everything.
But the overlap is important,
whether for Palantir or anything else. But right
now, it's about Palantir. So recognizing that this
goes back a long way and this has
been being built for a while.
Here's what WikiLeaks wrote on the third. Palantir
is engaged in a major expansion of the
American surveillance state.
Spyware company was what they that's WikiLeaks calls
Palantir a spyware company. Very relevant.
Spyware company Palantir is engaged in large scale
data collection on American citizens. Maybe Alex Jones
should read this. I'm sure he has. He
doesn't care. Having taken on multiple contracts across
federal government agencies with large holdings of private
information,
a March 2025 executive order signed by Trump
mandated all federal agencies to remove
all barriers to intra and interagency sharing of
unclassified
records,
Otherwise, known as your personal information.
So you literally exact and that's what that's
that flew to the radar while you signed
executive orders, but everything else. And for some,
anyway. And the point is that they've just
removed all barriers. They removed the silos. And,
you know, at the same time, using personal
computer overlaps. They didn't use the government stuff
at the beginning. All this stuff is showing
you there's an open door to something else,
whether it's Palantir by itself or through that
Israel or maybe both.
Or, you know, consider for yourself what you
think it is. The point is that is
done for a reason.
At the same time, the administration is committing
hundreds of millions of dollars to Palantir, a
major intelligence contractor whose CEO Alex Karp told
the investors in 2025 in February, Palantir is
here to disrupt, and when necessary, to scare
our enemies and, on occasion, kill them.
And you realize that many of them frame
you as their enemy. Right? If you support
Palestine, you're their enemy. Now that may seem
hyperbolic to you, but it's really not that
far fetched. As even Zoe Smith points out
in a recent work, these background the these
these,
these lines are already being connected. I mean,
they're they're already the the reality of potentially
going to a near future where drones are
enforcing the law, borderline taking lethal action is
not very far fetched at all.
Palantir's data op analytics,
product, Foundry, which is what we've been talking
about, is already installed within four federal agencies,
including the HHS,
Department of Homeland Security,
with talks underway for other agencies, including the
IRS.
Realize Foundry is completely overlapped with Israel. We
already went over that in a previous show.
Widespread development would give the administration
unprecedented warrantless access to the private records of
everyone in The United States, whether they are
suspects in a criminal investigation or not. So
get rid of the whole point about needing
warrants to look at your personal data. Defies
a discussion. Oh, that's irrelevant now. They need
they could take whatever they want.
Real think about that. How crazy it is
with people pushing back on that, rightly so,
from the Democrat side of it. The FISA
discussion, the FBI, and they just yanks this
whole thing out and no one says a
word.
Probably because half of them don't even realize
what's going on.
Things like this. Police across The US have
quietly adopted new AI surveillance system. Now that,
technically, the point over here is the silos
of data, but the AI data system being
you that that's being used to develop.
Across the entire United States quietly rolls out
a new AI system,
surveillance. The whole point is that the immigration
o f, they're monitoring
every immigrant they claim, which means they monitor
everybody in the country, guys.
How let me there was gonna come a
point where that shoe will drop, and they
go, oh, guess what? We're already scanning you
right now, but it's for your best interest.
When at a point when that already becomes
inevitable.
But it's been going on a lot longer
than that.
Greg Reese has a great clip here we're
gonna play, and this is AI kill and
control system by Palantir.
In 02/2024,
Palantir made a deal with Israel to harness
Palantir's
advanced technology
in support of war related missions. We see
part of that technology today as the Lavender
AI system, which assigns Palestinians
a numerical score of one to a 100
based on how likely they are of being
an enemy.
It has a 10% error rate, which has
been acceptable for Israel and Palantir.
We're getting wealthy off of killing Palestinian.
Palantir.
Before I let him answer, doesn't that sound
familiar to you?
The whole point based system based on that
sounds like what they're using to round up
immigrants, doesn't it? Oh, you got a baseball
hat and a tattoo. Well, that meets our
criteria
despite the possibility of mistake. I mean, we're
now we're talking about kind of two different
things, but it's the same point.
And when they adopt or rather, I think
when they fully commit
to and show you the surveillance Panopticon that's
being built or already there,
you don't think that applied? It's the same
thing, guys. And they there'll there'll be a
system based on how they decide whether you
are crossing a certain barrier or not.
Whether that's in discussing whether you call it
Israel or not, kinda seems like a relevant
factor seeing as how they're reporting people who
are here legally with no criminal record, many
of them because they said things about Israel.
Alex Karp and Teal and everyone in the
Trump administration are all blindly supporting Israel to
the point of funding a genocide, and we're
telling you that you're not allowed to criticize
them.
And now we're talking about this overlap with
drones and what they're providing for Ukraine and
execute. It's not it is like a hair
away from being that reality, and that's not
hyperbolic. It is concerning,
but it's not crazy.
Palestinian
with their AI and technology
Oh. Killing my family in Palestine. Yeah. And,
you know find a person. How are you?
How do you sleep at night? Well, if
you blame on you. Do you wanna hear
my answer? So the primary source of of
death in Palestine
is the fact that Hamas has realized that
there are millions and millions of useful idiots
that will using that excuse. This is why
you don't get a flash. Carry your AI
and your technology from Palantir to kill
Palestinian.
Mostly
terrorists.
So what do you think about the use
of artificial intelligence or lavender
by the IDF in
identifying
Hamas targets?
Look. I yeah. I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without without,
going into all the deep you know, I
I'm I'm not on top of all the
details of what's going on in Israel because
my my bias is to defer to Israel.
It's it's it's not for us
to to guess every, everything. And, I I
believe that,
broadly, the IDF gets to decide, what it
wants to do and that they're broadly in
the right
Does that does that not look like a
somebody's I mean, I'm not this is my
personal
opinion.
But does that not strike you as somebody
who is scared?
I mean, look at the way he's responding
to this. He can't even and it there's
not unique for him stumbling in his words.
But what a I mean, he's a very
powerful and very influential person.
And we know how they have gotten I
mean, the the Israeli intelligence apparatus has done
far worse to far more powerful people. The
bottom line
is that this is somebody that strikes me
as afraid to make the wrong statement. I
just think that's very much worth pointing out.
And it shows you the level of influence
power whether blackmail or whatever else is going
on just as a hypothetical point that could
be applied to people in these positions and
would explain a lot.
And that they're broadly in the right And
along with the Lavender system, there is the
Habsora
AI system,
which means the gospel, which is an AI
tool created to address the human issue of
running out of targets. Habsora generates up to
100 targets per day. Both these AI systems
use Palantir's
advanced surveillance technology
to track every person's phone records, social media,
and movement patterns. Palantir's tech is used by
the US military
and local police departments. It is the premier
tool for mass surveillance.
When running for his term, Trump was saying
he would implement a biometric tracking system. We
will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately. We will ensure that this system is
in place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper
tracking system.
Palantir cofounder
Peter Thiel donated $1,250,000
to that campaign, and he donated 15,000,000
to JD Vance's
2022
Ohio senate campaign.
Palantir has significant ties to the CIA
starting in 2004
when the CIA's venture capital arm In Q
Tel
gave Palantir $2,000,000.
Palantir's Gotham platform was developed by and for
the CIA.
Initially,
the CIA was Palantir's
sole customer
for several years.
Palantir
is the CIA's
surveillance tool, and now Palantir is to create
a system for the federal government that will
monitor every American under an AI system, linking
Social Security, the IRS, and immigration
into one centralized
system.
It will be using its Gotham software
developed by the CIA
to track and condition
human behavior.
Most of yesterday's
alternative media
support this.
For those who can still think clearly,
this is as dystopian as it gets. But
there are many fools who are content that
the fascist society
being put into place will not be woke.
But don't be surprised if it comes with
a carbon tax, and an American version of
a social credit system.
Greg Rees reporting.
Solid.
So here's the the we've talked about this
from the moment this came out because nine
seven two magazine broke this down. And this
is the,
the lavender. Technically, this one came out A
mass assassination factory
inside Israel's calculated bombing of Gaza, and it
is the Habsura.
And this this, basically, this is the gospel,
is what it breaks down to, is what
it stands for. And it's it's this is
what IDF members were calling them, a mass
assassination factory. And they were killing people just
to kill them, targeting people specifically. Now Lavender
was another element to this. One for buildings
and centralized entity, one for individual people. And
they're they're
they're mapping this out. Like, we just saw
with the Ukraine overlap. Andro drones,
Palantir technology. And what they're doing, remember, is
the let's see if I can
get
it
to
come
up.
Now the point was
body movements.
And what they did is they're basically in
these drones. They're they figured out a way
to to
they're they're trying to kind of map out
further how you can use these drones to
to decide who is a Russian entity by
their movements, by and so on. And that's
necessary for a place where people are trying
to avoid biometrics, wear glasses and hats and,
and so it's about domestic control, guys. It
or at least a part of that. They're
now rolling this stuff out. You know this
is coming. And so the idea is they
need to be able to as efficient as
possible in their minds, know who they're talking,
who they're looking at, who they're tracking. And
this is what it's all about. Like, Gaza
has been a training ground for everything for
a long time. Whatever they're testing is being
tested on the Palestinians.
You're seeing it right here.
Now here is what Alan McLeod adds to
this, how Palantir's Project Lavender helped create a
kill list for Israel to target civilians in
Gaza. And this is specifically about the breakdown
of how, you know, the the
the point system and how they work this
out, which is just
sickening. People don't know Project Lavender is an
extremely notorious and controversial
project that the Israeli military has ongoing. It's
basically an AI powered targeting system. What that
means is that Palantir provides the software reportedly
that allows the Israeli military to use AI
to generate
gigantic kill lists of Palestinians and to avoid
what they call human bottlenecks in targeting. What
that means is basically every Palestinian in Gaza
has been assigned a number between one and
a 100, and it's based on how likely
you are to be a target to the
Israeli military. And your score goes up, for
example, if you are in a WhatsApp group
with a known Hamas member, or you live
in the same building as a Hamas member
or, for example, you work as maybe an
ambulance driver who goes to the scene of
a lot of bombings and stuff.
Or
you work with have a phone call with
somebody they claim
is Hamas.
Right? Maybe because they were at a school
that had Hamas logo on it or because
they forced it in as the government. That's
important to think about too. So he's just
making it very clear in regard to even
tangential. You can be killed because you're next
to somebody, and we already made that clear.
But as he would also point out and
has,
they can accuse people being Hamas that aren't,
and it doesn't make any difference. And then
you being next to them is the same
point. Or if we're just gonna be really
honest, they're killing every Palestinian anyway, and so
it's just an excuse to kill whoever they
can. That is the truth. That will trigger
your number to move up. And if it
goes beyond a certain number, say, 70, you
are automatically put onto a kill list.
That includes women and children as well. There
was some studies that showed that Palatir had
a 10% false positive rate on that. Apparently,
the Israeli military really rely on this Project
Lavender, and the human intervention in this is
about twenty seconds. Just Remember, we talked about
this a while ago and got so much
pushback from people saying, that's not true. Palantir
is not there. You know, despite the provable
over partnership, they just said, no. They're not
that that's not theirs.
Yet again.
Just to check whether that person is indeed
male, and that's all they do. And then
they use AI to target these individuals with
smart weapons and drone warfare, etcetera.
And here, as we've shown you many times
and I just think the date is so
important. 01/12/2024.
Teal's Palantir, Israel, agreed strategic partnership for tech
battle tech, and yet they tried to pretend
like that wasn't the literal AI systems they
were designing. It's it's just ridiculous. But there's
KARP, there's teal, and they are both adamantly
pro Israel blindly, as you just heard.
Here's a a post as David, Jay Riley.
I'm not familiar with, award winning radio host.
I'll check him out. He says, does it
make sense yet?
Palantir stands with Israel. Look at that. I
mean, that's a New York Times entire page
ad. Palantir
stands with Israel. Palantir.
Think about that, guys. I mean, they were
aggressively coming out. That is very clear.
Just to show again that Derek wrote this
in April 24, and that that was I
mean,
individually, he's been covering this a long time.
Together with TLAB, we've been covering it well
before this. This was just compiling all the
important stuff because we saw this coming very
clearly. Welcome to the Palantir world order. It's
a great article.
As Derek wrote, I didn't realize there would
be so much cope and excuses once people
realized how powerful Palantir is and that Trump
is working hand in glove with them. He
says myself, Ryan, Whitney, Corbett, and others have
been reporting on this for years now, including
right before the election.
Jason Basler pushed this tweet out. Trans and
it says, I hate thinking. Me too. This
is Palantir is just fixing the immigration problem
in The US. We need to trust Trump's
plan.
He just says, translation, authoritarianism is fine as
long as it's my team doing it.
Exactly.
Now we've shown you this before, that this
goes back to Trump's last administration, how Peter
Thiel's secretive data company pushed into policing. You
know, it didn't didn't get as much attention
then. But let's keep pretending like this is
a small side only leftist thing that Jones
wants you to think. This has been slowly
building around you for a long time.
And this shows you that it was during
Biden's administration too, which is the point. It's
a bipartisan
it's just a nonpartisan thing. It's your government,
guys.
Fed scoop. HHS renews,
expands Palantir's Tiberias contract, $31,000,000.20
21. The point is that it is it
is your government, and they've been using it
from health to surveillance to every for a
long it's and it's not I don't mean
in the sense that it is today. I
mean, in the sense that they've been spying
and collecting this data and using this stuff
for a long time, and Palantir has been
building this or they've been building it collectively
what it is now.
That it's you can't deny this. The the
the tracks were being laid.
And, of course, we talked about this on
May 31. Palantir's new in quotes because it's
not new. US surveillance database.
Palantir, of course, the the article that even
Jones was telling the New York Times is
a bunch of lefties, which is true. The
point or the sense that it's left leaning.
The point is just because New York Times
wrote it does not therefore mean that it's
false, but it's an easy scapegoat or, you
know, lazy mental argument. Well, their side, they're
lying. And, usually, they are. Point is, this
a lot of times, the best lies use
truth. Here, it says the recently published article
by the New York Times is blatantly untrue.
It's not, though. It's exactly what's happening as
we've been covering for a very long time.
But as Steve and I discussed, it says
Palantir never collects data to unlawfully
surveil Americans. As far as I remember, the
New York Times article never really made an
allegation about whether this was against the law
or not, simply saying that they're building a
surveillance database.
And so when they come out and say,
Blatantly untrue, people then go, Oh, okay. We're
good. Because Palantir said they're lying and Palantir's
on my side. But they don't go into
whether or not they're they're dressing the full
picture. Now we made this discussion on Ann
Wake Up. The unlawfully it's like, okay. Well,
if the president says it's okay, does that
make it then lawful? Well, no. But it's
a debatable argument that they think they can
say that we don't unlawfully do it because
they believe they're being given the legal reality
to do what nobody wants to do. See
what I'm saying? But either way and our
Foundry platform employs granular security per Foundry is
the point.
But the guy the idea is that they're
trying to pretend they're not doing what we
all see them doing. And why do you
think that is?
Here's one overlap to this. And as seven
seas points out, Howard Lutnick told you robotics
are going to replace you. Not in five
to ten years. It's next year.
Trump supporters seem to be in full support
of the job stealing boogeyman that they've always
claimed to be against.
Again, the idea that, oh, they're stealing our
jobs except when you roll out the other
thing that's going to it's okay because our
side's doing it. You know, it's just that's
partisanship for you.
Amazon prepares to test humanoid robots for delivering
packages. And you know how that's net you
know how that's gonna work? Artificial intelligence.
And if you read this listen to it,
he's just simply saying exactly that, that this
this is always the plan. Now Jason Basler
says, so ICE is contracting private firms to
use facial recognition to scrape social media, monitor
critics of ICE and and Israel, and funnel
it all into a master database run by
Palantir,
a company with deep ties in CIA?
This is how every dystopian novel starts. Pay
attention. You're right. Now it's more than just
that, though. ICE contracting private firms, like, realize
it's and then the the database is not
just that going in. Database is them circs
grabbing everything they have on you from these
siloed discussion points or, excuse me, databases
and putting it together. That's what they're using.
So they it's not like they're just scooping
up what ICE gathers. They already they have
what the government has on you. Think about
that. That's what's that's what's alarming. And then
he also makes an excellent point that Derek
was pointing out.
He says some same architect,
same AI surveillance, same agenda, just rebranded and
marketed for the right.
It's the Scooby Doo thing with the guy
in the mask, and it says Palantir. He
takes the mask off, and it says World
Economic Forum.
You know, whether that's exactly the case or
not, like like, legitimately,
the point is that you have to see
the agenda.
And as we said, I've we made this
case in the beginning. It's just it's the
great reset, build back better, with the flave
right flavoring. It's the same thing, guys. And
that's what he's trying to say right there.
We can't see the same,
you know, sustainable development goals being met, the
same I mean, everything. AI and the robots
and the whole thing. That's what if you
read down the list, they're basically checking every
box,
but with a slightly different angle to it.
And lastly on this, you might have seen
this today. Jeffrey Epstein invested with Peter Thiel,
and his estate is reaping millions.
That seems pretty relevant today, especially with the
blow up of Elon Musk and Epstein and
Trump. It just kinda stands out. It says
Jeffrey Epstein, the registered sex offender and, you
know, a lot more than that, met with
many powerful people in finance and business during
his career, but the financier invested with only
a few of them. One of those people
was Peter Thiel. Who could've saw that coming?
Everybody, I think. The Silicon Valley billionaire. In
02/1516,
mister Epstein put $40,000,000
into two funds managed by Valar Ventures, which
I'm gonna continue to look into, a New
York firm that was cofounded by mister Thiel.
Today, that investment is worth a $170,000,000.
It says the money is more likely to
be distributed to one of mister Epstein's former
girlfriends
and two of his long term advisers
who have been named the beneficiaries of the
state. What?
Like, think about that for a We're talking
about a sex trafficking
like, this guy is everyone knows this.
And it was as much as they really
wanna put it to bed, this was not
a one off thing. This was one element
of a larger apparatus
as we've heard from Acosta and others that
he worked it was at it was CIA.
It was Mossad. And that there's
x
long term girlfriends
around long term advisors and Epstein girlfriends. They're
supposed to take the money. I I mean,
how crazy is that? They've never arrested anybody
that was supposed to be, you know, a
recipient of his services.
And and so that means the entire thing
is still there. And so this doesn't that
scream that these are the people that are
running this operation at the consideration that maybe
that they know something? The money going to
them when it was ill over overarching point
was his money was ill gotten gain. I
mean, it just seems so wild to me.
But that's not the point. I just wanna
include that because it stood out to me.
The point is that this is are are
arguably newly revealed. I'm not sure I bet
you somebody else has pointed this out in
the past. Epstein invested with
Peter Thiel.
Now that point should matter,
especially for the Republicans that have this, thou
shall not pass argument for anything about Epstein
except for Trump, suddenly probably don't care about
this too.
But you know it matters.
Excuse me.
Now last couple of points here.
Gerald Celente points out, Epstein made teal and
teal made teal made vents. Now if it's
that whether it's that exact or not or
specific,
the point is to you can't miss how
these overlaps continue.
And if you're really being honest, it begins
to feel like you're being played.
Now, this is just sort of humorous but
also kinda concerning.
It says congratulations, America. You just handed all
of your Social Security numbers and banking information
over to this guy. Play the bomb.
It's
That is not Oh, I I I I
I I I I don't know what
what to say. I,
look. I again, I'm not I'm not,
you know, I
you know, with without without,
going into all deep you know, I
It's
it is,
it's
it's,
well,
let me it's
I I I there's several different things one
could say. It's,
I Yeah. That's just a little bit uncomfortable.
Right? But he's just that's not new for
him, you know? And I just think it
it does speak volumes in a lot of
ways. Now just lastly, though, tomorrow, we will
be doing a panel on Palantir.
It's not gonna it's it's not everyone in
the IMA. Some of them some people couldn't
make it, but I think there's about five
or six of us that are gonna be
there. And we'll be discussing Palantir. I I
think we're set for 1PM central time tomorrow,
and and this is gonna be a great
conversation about a lot of this. You know,
just trying to flush this out and have
conversations about where it goes and, you know,
just so you know, in general, when we
do these panels, there's not really generally, like,
a set. It's just a well, Palantir is
is the top focal point and whatever anybody
wants to bring to the table, which is
why I really like that because, ultimately, we
all may have a different perspective or different
way we see it playing out. And so
you get a lot of different perspectives. And
I think that's important as as opposed to
trying to, like, here's our objective to you
know, we think this is happening. Let's talk
about that. That seems contrived to me. Right?
And so the the the talking point was
Palantir.
And whoever wanted to join, tomorrow, we're discussing
that with the IMA and and where we
think this is going.
But I wanna include that. So tomorrow, I
will be doing that and most likely not
getting another daily wrap up. But if the
time works, I will. But if that, that,
the day after. And the point is I'll
be discussing the follow-up of the immigration conversation.
This is just to remind me of that.
I wanna show you Trump banned citizens of
12 countries from traveling to The United States.
And what stood out to me as absolutely
cartoonish was the fact that on that list
was Sudan, Haiti, Lib oh, you mean the
countries that you wanna send people to that
you claim as a safe haven, but now
you're restricting travel for US?
Yep. Yeah. Exactly. It is and, again, people
that are, in many cases,
who are legally in the country with no
criminal record. It's gross.
As well as this overlap, man robbed Mexican
immigrant then wrote a fake Trump as threat
in his name so he'd be deported before
testifying. We already talked about this. It's just
continued to flesh out in really embarrassing ways
that Kristi Noem was either played or didn't
care. Probably both.
But they they they knew how frivolous they
were being with this deportation effort. And instead
of and the so the person, knowing he
was about to go to jail for this
this crime, wrote a letter faking it was
this guy to get the guy who was
accusing him of a crime to go get
deported before it happened. And you can't even
you can't make this up. That's crazy.
And it came out in bombastic fashion, and
they're being called up for it. On that
note,
I just saw another recent claim of of
a assassination threat. Truly, this should begin to
undermine the whole thing of what's been going
on. At least make you wonder.
But we'll talk about that more in the
upcoming show, as well as the Freedom City
conversation that we're going to have very shortly.
This is just to remind me, but also
to point this out. 03/07/2025.
Startup city groups say they're meeting Trump officials
to push for deregulated
freedom cities.
And one of those that they mentioned are
how it's supposed to look,
like Prospera.
Those that watch this show, you already know
how concerning that is to me. It's not
libertarian. It is a it is a Peter
Thiel backed
authoritarian
technocratic
occupation, in my opinion.
Illegally done with the illegal illegal 2009 regime
change of Honduras, which is why it was
allowed. I mean, it gets very clear.
But the point is about the Freedom City
overlap, the 15 city Freedom City kind of
game they're playing and where that goes,
especially since there's been this floated rumor about
Trump turning Washington DC into the Freedom City
and giving it to Peter Thiel. I have
seen nothing to back that up other than
rumor, but, you know, it doesn't seem that
crazy to me. But I just wanna make
sure we had the conversation of Freedom Cities
and where that goes before this becomes something
that's really happening. So we'll come back to
that, and I'll include this show, which you
should watch. This is gonna I promise you,
this will be one of the most prescient
shows we've done. We talked about this a
long time ago. And it's and even and
it's been floated here and there, but the
Freedom City thing does seem to be coming.
And this is my opinion. This is part
of the technocratic takeover,
but we'll come back to it.
So thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I appreciate the continual support for this platform.
As you know, we need it more than
ever. I mean, we we we've been diminished
in a lot of ways over the last
so many months because of the lawsuits and
a lot of other things. So we had
to pull back on a lot of the
writing, which I'm I'm determined
to not let that go. We will build
back to where we were and continue beyond
that. But if you believe what we're doing,
this is a, you know, value for value.
We do this because we believe in it.
We put it out there for free. So
if you find value in what we're doing,
show us what that looks like to you.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.