Steel funded or founded companies are have, you
know, since Vance was announced have
essentially signal that they're all in on on
the Trump Vance campaign. And this also includes
Palmer Luckey as well of the defense contractor,
Anduril,
which is making
a lot of unmanned drones and other, you
know, defense weapons. It's building our virtual border
wall on The US Mexico border that Trump
supports instead of a physical barrier that he
used to campaign on. And they're also hugely
involved in the Ukrainian contract. So so it's
just possibility
of of a second Trump administration
winding down,
American aid to Ukraine. I think with Thiel
in the equation,
becomes questionable right away because, Anduril, Clearview, and
Palantir itself intimately involved with the Ukrainian military
as it relates to the conflict with Russia.
Well, so anything that would see their contracts
or their bottom line as it relates to
their
involvement in that conflict, I think it's unlikely
that it would whittle down significantly.
If the oil has the influence that is
to be expected in a second Trump term.
So do you think that is all
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we
find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 06/01/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Some developments in Ukraine that we're gonna touch
on right to start, but in my opinion,
definitely feels like sort of a not a
distractionary story, but something that is taking the
attention away from what's really going on when
that story has been developing the same way
for quite a long time, at least as
I see it. And we'll overlap that with
what you said there to start. The main
focus of today is to focus on the
follow-up of the Palantir conversation
and what it's and the kind of the
shockwave that it sent through the MAGA community.
And I and I think it's a very
positive thing for people to be recognizing,
possibly for the first time, that this is
what has always been being built. Now, that
doesn't have to mean that Trump was aware
of that. If that makes it easier to
digest,
I would I would happily allow that thought
to be you know, consider that myself. I
do all the time. I've thought about this
over the years as you guys watch the
show. You know that I I would still
don't even know whether I placed Trump in
a position where I think that he's being
played in some cases where as opposed to
him,
you know, knowingly being a part of some
agenda. And I think it's a mixed bag.
But it's important regardless of that to recognize
what is happening. At this point, it's no
longer even debatable. We can I mean, even
the announcement, again, as I titled yesterday's show
of the new Palantir database, it's not even
remotely new? But what's new is that it's
being pointed to. And now a lot of
people are seeing it for the first time
and going, well, that's not what I asked
for. But a lot of us have been
ringing that bell and
cataloging and documenting all of how it's being
built together for quite a while. So that's
gonna be important thought thing to start with
today in regard to that
continuing conversation.
And and a couple more additional points to
the same thing we discussed yesterday
on the,
COVID nineteen mRNA injection conversation that is
seemingly getting more intense day by day.
Now we're gonna get into the overlap of
the MAGA response to this and the interesting
distractions therein that I also think are relevant.
And then the second major point today is
going to be about the aid massacre,
which, like the flower massacre, it is pretty
hard to miss what's actually happening.
It doesn't stop them from screaming the narratives
they want to scream or the governments to
support them from
blindly going along with whatever they have to
say despite all the evidence, all the documentation.
I mean, it just it's
it's grotesque.
And it's gonna be for those that wanna
be aware of it, maybe you don't wanna
see this today or you have children tuning
in. I mean, I shouldn't say it. I
don't think there's too much graphic content, but
it's just hard to watch innocent people starving
to death and being shot at by the
people claiming to be there to support them,
and that this seems to have been what
was going to happen from the beginning. At
least people
like, a lot of us would have argued
based on what's happened every single time before
this, but I think it was Muhammad Shehadi
who put out a video two days before
saying this is what's gonna happen, and then
it happened. So it's very much worth considering
whether that might have been the deliberate plan.
And the the reason I framed it there
in the title was the engineered aid massacre,
because we have to understand that this from
an Israeli perspective like, you could argue whether
The US wanted a genocide.
At this point, it seems irrelevant seeing as
how they've continued to support it either way.
But understanding that Israel has at this point,
I mean, I it's so frustrating to have
to
quit.
For years, the Israeli government, Netanyahu in particular,
have been telling you this is what they
wanted to accomplish. And so when this started
post October 7, a lot of us said,
look at what they've been telling you. Look
at their own words.
And then, you know, all the narrative and
the lies about what was really there, and
Palestine never existed.
Of course. And then it continues, and we
get even more information. And we go, see.
We were telling you, and there's new narratives.
And at this point, it's come full circle
as as somebody else was just making fun
of it. It's like it started where, you
know, what genocide? What occupation? And now literally
telling you, well, the occupation is the end
goal. It's like, well, that's exactly what we
were telling you. And I mean, the further
occupation. The point is their narrative that they
said was fake is now the actual stated
objective. And
And that's just really important to understand. And
so when you see people being mowed down,
who they have told you they want to
get rid of, who they have told you
is Amalek and needs to be destroyed,
we shouldn't be surprised when you watch them
do that.
So we're gonna go over all that in
a couple of different points that evolved beyond
that conversation from Israel and some immigration points
I wanted to highlight
that sort of kind of dovetail between these
two conversations, the surveillance and the obvious immigration
overlap, and then I think the Israel influence
on that immigration conversation.
And these aren't debatable. You can see them.
The Israel Zionist organization is going deport this
person, deport that person. And in many cases,
being proven to being lying.
And people almost being deported regardless, being arrested
for forty eight hours despite it turning out
that Batar USA
blatantly made up a crime or a a
claim. We're gonna discuss one point today of
of Noam, Christy Noam, in a conversation about
somebody who they claim wrote a letter to
assassinate Trump or threatened to. It turns out
that was a fraud. And it's even being
fact checked on Twitter of all places. And
it turns out that they I mean, the
way you we're gonna get into it all,
but what's incredible is to see how their
own radical mindset has almost being weaponized against
them by people who know they're gonna take
the bait.
Maybe that's all by design. I don't know.
But it's important to be aware and to
call out
what this really is. You know? The frivolous,
completely unfair like, the what they're doing is
affecting people's constitutional rights. When and, I mean,
being floated as Americans, being next more than
once should be alarming, but it should matter
to you regardless of whether the person has
a certain skin color, whether they're originally from
this country. People that are here legally who
have no criminal record have been sent to
El Salvador. That alone should drive you crazy.
And every time we talk about that, nonetheless,
people go, well, how are they here legally
if they cross the border illegally? It's like,
I don't think you're listening to me. No
criminal record and in the country legally, and
many of them are in El Salvador. Many
of them are still being arrested, being deported,
visas being yanked
out of nowhere for no reason and being
sent because they don't have a visa. Are
people showing up to their legal court hearings?
Or, right, not hearings, but,
immigration meetings?
Not because they're forced to, but because they
want citizenship or they're applying for asylum and
then being arrested at that meeting.
Hard to say that's the worst of the
worst when they're people that are following through
the law. Pretty sure the ones that don't
show up for their meetings are probably a
little bit worse, and they're not going after
those ones, at least not in large. But
we won't go into that in-depth today, but
it's important to keep a tabs on that
story. But let's start today with a quick
point that I wanted to highlight that I
thought was really interesting, and then we're gonna
touch on that whole Ukraine point and go
back to Whitney's opening there. Now this is
actually pretty interesting, and you guys have seen
this. I just wanted to make sure that
this was, like, documented on this show, and
plenty of others have called this out.
So this is the post from yesterday. Palantir's
new US surveillance database and FDA approves new
mRNA COVID shot using vaccine placebo. We're gonna
touch on that again today.
And, actually, a a very, I guess, humorous
but at the same time alarming point of
showing you why you can't trust Grok. It's
exactly what we keep saying. It's a tool
that can be used and I need myself,
as I said, wondering why I should still
be using it at all and question that
every time I do. The point though is
that always check your information, whether it's an
encyclopedia,
a news channel, or a grok. You always
double check your information. That's whether doctor or
whatever. That's the old game they play where
you're not supposed to you're supposed to trust
your authorities. Well, authorities are wrong all the
time. A lot of times by by choice.
But the point is this show was got
a lot even on this platform, it got
a lot of reach. There's thousands of people
tuned in. But weirdly enough, as even though
it's pinned, you notice a lot of really,
really, really low reach. With 75, 70 six
thousand followers, I think I find it hard
when when it's popular show, when you can
tell just by the engagement that it gets
basically no reach. But we know what this
is, guys. And by the way, take note
that you can only see one comment despite
there being seven of them. And I can
I'm I'm gonna tell you what that is
right now. The people you can the people
that block you or you block, a lot
of times don't show up. So what this
is, for those that have already documented this,
there's bots all over this platform that will
jump in. Look. They even tag daily wrap
up on there. Clearly, this is targeted. And
they jump in and they say, interesting read,
and they tag one of these guys that
are talking about investments. We all see these
bots out there, but they go, I can't
believe this investment I just made. Check this
guy out. And it's all, like, no following
accounts. Like, if you look at the account,
zero followers.
Like, it's just it's a complete bot account,
and they know it. They facilitate it on
this platform. And it says, your market insights
always help connect the dots. I didn't even
touch on something like that in the show.
And it says, the Palantir FDA angle is
definitely one to watch. Hashtag t lab. They're
not they're not watching the show. Then they
blocked me, as you can see.
So what I'm showing you this for is
the way that this is weaponized
is that they know as they change the
the the algorithm that if you get a
lot of blocks
and a lot of negative engagement, well, that
suppresses your content. So that's not something that's
organic. That just they that basically gave them
the ability to just mass flag.
Oh, you mean, just like with Jack Posobiec
or not Posobiec. I'm sorry. Dorsey.
Just like the last Twitter where they could
just mass flag and it was down and
then we said that's shadow banning. And they
go, yeah. Okay. Here's the new version.
So exactly the same thing with a slightly
different flavor. Well, yeah, just like everything else
today. The bottom line is these are Israeli
bots or other bots or whatever manipulators who
are actively doing this under
certain shows.
You I'm sure you could decipher which ones
those are that ultimately see that suppressed. And
you guys chime in with what you see.
Make sure people talk about this because this
is a weaponized aspect of this website. If
they cared about free speech, this would not
be what happens.
So all they do is dump down votes
and blocks all over, and they all of
a sudden, it gets suppressed.
So since we're here, what I do every
time
Oh, so let me do this. I just
wanna do it live so you guys can
see. And I don't know whether this makes
it worse or better. I'm really not sure.
But because I just don't want them to
keep doing this and I don't want them
to be following me, I tend to go
back. Look. Zero followers. Zero zero. So they're
made they created this probably just for this
whole thing. I go through and I block
them,
and then I go back and I hide
it
and block. Well, I guess I go, oh,
that's where I usually hide block from that
one spot. So the con the the the
post gets hidden, but that the effect is
already there.
Just thought that was worth pointing out, guys.
I'm telling you this stuff is everywhere.
So on keeping and keeping that mind I
mean, the whole thing we're talking about today,
like, the real kind of in the air
conversation is the artificial intelligence,
the surveillance,
kind of the building out of their AI
government's Palantir
technocratic panopticon. It's the digital control grid that
we have been telling you is coming, and
now finally, it's being acknowledged. By the way,
I'm realizing right now that I don't know
if you saw this when I started the
show.
I put this
Palestine coin on my necklace because I think
it's really cool and I but I can
hear it clinking the whole time and I
guarantee you guys can hear it on the
show. So I apologize for that. So I'm
probably not gonna keep wearing it for the
show. But it keeps you in and see
it. Somebody sent me this coin,
yesterday and it's one of those that say
Palestine on it. 1927,
I think it's in there. I forget. And
it basically just says or what? No. That
wasn't right. I forget the date. But basically
just said, you know, it is it exists.
So I really appreciate that who sent that.
So anyway, I wanted to note that in
case in the podcast you're hearing that clinky
noise, that won't be a regular occurrence. So
back to the point.
So discussing the idea of Ukraine. Now the
reason I included this is because I'm I'm
seeing this kind of fluctuate around the conversation.
There's a few reasons this is important. Three
in my mind, really. One is that this
is not new. Now I'm not gonna suggest
this is not important.
This is a war, and it's very real.
And Israel and The United States and The
UK are massively invested in what
Ukraine is doing, if you can even call
it that anymore. It's the Azov movement. It's
a neo Nazi proxy element that's been funded
by Israel, United States, and the CIA for
decades. One of the most provable things in
this conversation, I've gone over it extensively.
The point is that for them to act
like this is somehow not their involvement or
what what happens through Ukraine is not their
responsibility. It's the same as pretending like the
genocide is not their responsibility or they're not
culpable or complicit.
So that's important to understand. It is a
very big deal.
And the secondarily, to understand that they are
immersed in this and they're not, you know,
devoid of responsibility for what's going on. Because
we're what we're gonna get to is there's
new reports about Ukraine's drones bombing into Russia.
I reported this from The UK Times, like,
I think, a year and a half ago.
They were reporting that the US government was
full military was flying
in Azov movement, Ukrainian militants to attack inside
of Russia. I mean, that was a long
time ago. So if we're gonna have some
barrier being crossed, like and my point is
I think this is being hyper focused on
because of do not look at Palantir, do
not look at everything else going on, don't
look at the aid massacre and the genocide
we're funding, Focus on this, but also ignore
that Trump and everybody else is involved in
what's happening there. Now that's just one part
of this, though. The other part of it
is to ask yourself how this ties into
today's show other than just notating it. Well,
that's because it turns out that you guys
already know if you watch this show that
both Palantir and Anduril
are involved in funding and programming drones that
are used by Ukraine. You know, the same
Palantir that's literally, basically I shouldn't be that,
hyperbolic with it, but, you know, a huge
part of the US government right now. That
has to be relevant. So keep that in
mind, and we'll come back to it. Russia
threatens NATO nations with revenge, nuclear strikes as
Putin expands military bases along Finnish border, April
29.
So what this is is one of the
things I was able pluck out that I'm
seeing people look at basically, the narrative right
now, which I should have just started with,
is the idea that Putin just threatened to
bomb NATO countries.
Even though that is highly unlikely,
my first thought, even though I always will
double check and look into it because that
does not seem like something that Putin is
he's not as bombastic and belligerent as The
US and Israel tend to be with their
foreign policy. You do that, I'll do something
you've never seen before is what you hear
from Trump or the US government.
Historically, that's not what you see from Putin.
You see it's more of a measured response.
That does not mean good guy. Understand? It
just means that he's more, you know, diplomatic
or more you know, what he does is
not
cartoonish in a political sense. Right? It it
will be tactful. It'll be tact tactical. That's
typically what you've seen. That's not a praise.
It's just an objective reality of what he's
done. Always playing the counterbalance to this bombastic
US foreign policy, maybe just because he wants
to be perceived that way or maybe because
he thinks it's the right way to go.
That's for you to decide. The point, though,
is to argue that he would come up
and threaten to bomb NATO countries. What is
the tactical
strategy? What is the benefit to doing that?
That should be your first thought. Who benefits?
Why would they do that? Now, unless it
is to threaten that so you respond that
that was never the plan, you know, they
just there's no strategy to saying, I'm gonna
do that if you do this. That's a
childish kind of thing that you expect from
US foreign policy. Now what's funny to me
is that if you read the first paragraph,
Russia's Former President
claimed NATO's newest members are potential targets for
revenge strikes using nuclear weapons as a crimp
oh, okay. So somebody who's not currently in
the government said that's what might happen. Now
that doesn't it's not meaningless.
You know? But just so we pointed out
before, when Lindsey Graham steps up and says,
we should do all of this. Well, Lindsey
Graham's an idiot. And nine times out of
10, when he says things like that, they
don't actually happen. It's more about serving the
people that are funding him or screaming the
narrative Israel wants, but that's within the government.
Now we're talking about somebody who's not. So
now this is like saying Obama steps up
and says, the US government's about to bomb
something. Well, that would still be Obama. He's
got insight, but it's not the government. So
I just think it's interesting how quickly these
things from partisan mainstream alternative media cascade into
emergency focus, watch World War three is coming,
and I miss everything else that's going on.
Again, not to downplay the seriousness of any
war, especially this one. Here is a report
from Alex Jones.
Nuclear war alert. Putin publicly says he will
nuke NATO countries if Western missiles strike Russia.
Oh, guess that was September 2024.
Funny how the same old narrative circle back
around. And you know what? I remember this.
And if you look into it, it's the
same thing. It was not this wasn't Putin
did not say I'm going to bomb NATO
countries. I've it's the same kind of hyperbolic,
I think, head fake that we get from
partisan media just like this.
Now just online, a quick kind of looking
around, you see these kind of things.
14,000 views, not small. Breaking NATO to on
full alert as Russia warns of potential strikes
on country supplying drones.
Now I guarantee you, and I have seen
these statements in the past about saying, well,
you're providing the support drones, military weapons, which
they know they are. Well, then you're responsible
for what's happening. Putin has made that point
a hundred times over. You think he doesn't
know right now already that they've been funding
and supporting these people?
He's called the same things out that I
that we have. So to argue that suddenly
this drone attack has changed something, it hasn't.
So it's interesting that that gets pointed to.
He already knows these things. He knows the
US government's funding it, but he does know
they're responsible. So I'm not gonna diminish the
possibility that if it was a large enough
attack, which we'll get to in a second,
that maybe he would
respond in a way that might include the
US government. I would argue not just because
that would cascade this into a much larger
issue. It would be another he would go
so you're talking about a proxy element from
the backing of The US and everybody else
attacking Russia.
So likely, they would respond on the proxy
element or something in connection to it, not
the US government because that would be World
War three. And a lot of people love
to frame the idea, which were have been
there for a long time, as Putin or
Assad or any of them being these belligerent
maniacs just like violence. It's just that's what
they need you to think, which is funny
enough, usually, how the people that are saying
that kinda tend to think. But
I don't see any real
validity to that statement or this one saying,
Putin orders high level emergency meeting to escalate
the conflict. You know, same kind of thing.
Same video, same clips.
So let's get to where the meat of
this is actually coming from. This is from
today. And what's funny is a lot of
the reports you're seeing is fly around, came
out a couple hours after this. So typical
mainstream alternative media where you even get a
mainstream media report and they just regurgitated it
in their own version as if they've got
secret sources, that tends to be the way
this goes. Now I'm not saying people don't
have secret sources, but just recognize the grift
that's going on today. Now this is just
simply saying Ukraine drones strike deep in Russia,
not the first time, hitting military planes. Now
the target, if you if we get
real confirmation of how serious it was, is
a big deal. Ukrainian drones hit several Russian
strategic airfields on Sunday, including
the Belaya military base deep in Eastern Siberia
after Moscow launched one of the longest drone
and missile attacks in Kyiv.
So even right there, I understand that Russia
bombs into Kyiv and
then Ukraine responds.
That doesn't that's not like on do they
you're arguing they kinda probably expected a response.
Right? Just thinking about this logically. So my
point is not to expect some wild cascading
issue when this is just the continued
continued warfare that we've been seeing go on
for years in this conflict that we should
all be calling out and that the West
is wildly involved in that they wanna pretend
like they're not.
More than 40 aircraft, which is a big
deal, including the Tu 95, Tu 22, and
M3 long range bombers capable of deploying conventional
or nuclear weapons, which tends to be, they
bomb nuclear planes. You know, that's the way
you can hyperbolically state that. They're planes that
can carry a lot of things. Nonetheless, my
point is just seeing that this
is, I think, the continuation of the war.
Here's some of the reports you're seeing circulate.
Ukraine struck multiple strategic bombers, which came out,
I think, an hour or so after that
report. So it's same thing. There are some
videos, but it's still up in the air.
This is happening as of right now.
Now let me play this clip again that
we started with, and I want you to
think about how important this becomes in the
bigger picture. Now this is in its in
the immediacy of the issue, just Ukraine and
Russia and what's that what that's causing. You
know, we shouldn't overlook the smaller thing or
shouldn't say smaller, but the immediate issues, like
the people suffering. The Ukrainian people who are
dying every day because our governments are using
them as batters against each other or the
people in Russia that are suffering in the
same way or the people in Donbas or
the people in Crimea that are suffering. And
realize that's not and never am I saying
Russia good guy. But if you can't recognize
the vast difference between the neo Nazi
Azov movement, CIA Israel funded maniacs they've been
using for a long time in that country
who are the reason people fled and Donbas
doesn't want a part of it
versus The U The any of the Russian
government in particular.
I I mean, you're blinding yourself to it.
So my point is that we should care
about the smaller part of again, the immediate
parts of this.
But beyond that, we also should recognize, even
if that's exactly what it looks like, the
bigger,
high high elevation view, which is that Palantir,
Anduril, these governments are using this war for
a lot of things. Starlink has been deployed.
They're using their AI models and these drones
to map things out and to test the
war just like they're doing in Israel.
So is that why this is continuing? I
thought Trump said he was gonna end it
on day one. Well, I never thought that
was gonna happen.
But what else is happening? Is it they
just couldn't do it? Or is there something
else happening? So, again, listen to what Whitney
had to say about this.
Steel funded
or founded companies are have, you know, since
Vance was, announced have
essentially signaled that they're all in on on
the Trump Vance campaign. And this also includes
Palmer Luckey as well of the defense contractor,
Anduril,
which is making,
a lot of unmanned drones and other, you
know, defense weapons. It's building our virtual border
wall on The US Mexico border that Trump
supports instead of a physical barrier that he
used to campaign on. And they're also hugely
involved in the Ukrainian contract. So so let's
just possibility
of of a second Trump administration
winding down,
American aid to Ukraine, I think with Thiel
in the equation,
becomes questionable right away because, Anduril, Clearview, and
Palantir itself intimately involved with the Ukrainian military
as it relates to the conflict with Russia.
Well So anything that would see their contracts
or their bottom line as it relates to
their,
involvement in that conflict, I think it's unlikely
that it would whittle down
Okay. So two things to consider. One, whether
just at a pure financial
interest
that maybe they may they don't want this
to end. I mean, you you realize that
they let's just I mean, I see this
more of the mind as, like, the technocratic,
like, globalist western, you know, whatever the with
The US direct driving it kinda thing right
now where they're all part of that, where
they do have a similar agenda they're trying
to accomplish. But at the same time,
we also have the
individual
direction and and possible
intentions or rather objectives of Palantir itself.
One of them being to continue to profit,
to continue to grow their in control. So
wondering whether on a on a personal level
that they might have just
driven this into continuing,
counter to what the US administration wants to
do. But beyond that as well, the larger
picture,
I think they all have a very clear
interest in maintaining this one because of the
ongoing dilemma or, you know, the
geopolitical
game they play with Russia. That's never stopped
being there.
But on top of that, the bigger picture
again of the AI, the training of large
language models, the the the surveillance and enforcement
side of that that we are now we
just rolled out them or, again, that's what
they're telling you, but it's always been there,
the Palantir database.
And they're telling you they're real time monitoring
immigrants, which means everybody in this country.
They need this information to continue to grow
and be and they my point is that
they need
the surveillance drone
dynamic of that to do all of this.
One of the things to consider, not that
we know for sure, is that this is
continuing or all of them are being continued
so that they can reach a certain end
point
as they roll out their technocratic Panopticon digital
control grid. Significantly.
If if Thiel has the influence that is
to be expected in a second Trump term.
So do you
by the way, that that's just where the
clip is. That has already.
So keeping that in mind,
just just simply asking BRAVE, it says, Anduril
Industries have been supplying drones to Ukraine, including
the alt Al Altuis
600 m and Altus 700 m loitering munitions,
which are designed for reconnaissance and precision strikes
against unidentified
targets.
Did I said that funny. So you have
the podcast against identified
targets.
So isn't that what we just saw happen?
So let's I mean, I it's it's not
hard to piece together that that means that
the the attack they just carried out
was being provide the the the,
device and the technology was provided by Andrew
and Palantir,
which is
a part of the US administration at this
point. And the US government is absolutely involved
with funding and continuing this war. So, I
mean, you can't really decouple these things.
Now it says the the drones have been
used by Ukrainian forces to disrupt Russian troop
advances and target positions behind behind the front
line. There you go. The UK government also
signed a contract, which again adds to the
global dynamic of all of this. Here's the
contract. Advanced attack drones for Ukraine in a
new deal struck by the UK government. So
you have Anduril
in their UK branch
making a deal with the UK government to
supply drones to Ukraine. Then you've got Anduril
with The US doing the same thing for
Ukraine.
That's very telling.
Now Palantir, in regard to the same conversation,
is involved in the use of drones in
Ukraine providing software that help in identifying and
targeting Russian troops.
Now Palantir's technology is reportedly being used to
train drones to recognize Russian soldiers
by their uniforms and their movements.
You don't think that's relevant to what we're
discussing? Being able to differentiate between people by
their movements and how they look, their dress,
their biometrics?
That's very important to be able to police
an entire country, don't you think?
That's where this is going if you're not
paying attention.
Here is
forces news. Ukraine trains army of robot drones
to identify Russian troops by their movement and
their uniform.
Let's cut to the chase, 2024.
Palantir, a US software company, and one of
the firms are driving Ukraine's push toward AI
drones.
It's where we're going. It's what they're doing.
It's where we are. The Palantir software collates
data from a number of sources, human intelligence,
drones, radar, and even thermal imaging that can
detect troop movements or artillery fire.
Oh, and let's not forget
how interesting it was that very recently, right
about the same time, they were really hyping
that whole weird drone thing that Jones pushed,
like, 17 different arguments for that never even
materialized
about secret drones everywhere and how they were
going to be sniffing for nuclear material or
it was Iran One day, next it was
something else, and then it just vanished and
no one talked about it anymore. It happens
almost every day. You know, the whole they're
all right is only when you look at
in specific you know, one of the 45
things they claimed that day about the same
topic, but here is a clip that was
put out during the army navy game, and
even that had big Palantir advertisements everywhere. Remember
that? Just in case you forgot, this is
what they're this is what they're involved in.
It shouldn't be surprising.
And this
is oh, did I forget to grab that?
This is
how did I do that? Important to consider
in the small like, the tiny like, the
drone discussion that we also recently talked about
from the,
nanotech side of it, the tiny drone discussion.
I think it was Zoe and I that
talked about that
and where this goes. And this is all
it's it's it's
kinetic attack military, but it's also surveillance. It's
also monitoring. It's also enforcement. I think that's
what's really important to to take from
this. So here is the clip they played,
which kinda it's kinda like that video we
talk about or what we've shown, right, where
you have the,
the nave the the military basically saying, you
know, we're in the shadows. You know, we're
committing psychological operations. Like, weird creepy video. You
know, where they just kinda say what it
what I guess others would argue isn't even
true. It's what this kinda feels like.
Oh, here. I have to get rid of
one. Hold on.
And here it is.
Here
comes your world. Right? The monitored, surveilled,
wartime, you know, like so this is all
wartime technology coming home.
So keeping that in mind,
let's talk about the larger overlap. Palantir's
new US surveillance database and FDA approves new
mRNA COVID shot using vaccine placebo. Now, again,
I'm not gonna get into that today, but
to make that point clear,
the whole thing was that RFK just recently
pointed out that the placebo thing is we're
gonna go back to that with saline. Right?
That we have to do all of them
that way. Any new vaccine will bleed placebo,
saline. Okay.
The problem is that in this one, none
of them used a a placebo at all.
Neither the safety test or the efficacy test
usually would be a safety test. But in
all of the rest of them, what they
used was comparative vax they used the old
Moderna vaccine and compared it to the new
vaccine.
Definitely not a placebo test and definitely not
one thing that we even RFK called out
in previous conversations. And here and now, we're
gonna get into the rolling out of new
shots that even Grok doesn't wanna tell you
about, which I find very interesting.
So make sure you watch this, by the
way. I think this is a really important
show.
But as we showed you, Mary Talley Bowden
says, I could not this is this is
I one again, that's one thing I forgot
to mention. One of the things I pointed
out in the last show as well, which
was from the one before that, actually, is
that on the schedule, as far as I
can tell, I didn't check this morning, but,
well, yesterday, they did not actually change the
schedule. They're saying they're gonna do that, and
maybe it'll happen tomorrow. Maybe there's a reason
it's gonna take a minute. But right now,
the schedule still does it's
does not say what they claim they just
changed, which is kinda what I expected, to
be honest. But she says on top of
that, because it still says this, keep in
mind from the CDC,
getting a COVID vaccine is a safer, more
reliable way to build protection than getting sick
with COVID. They're still arguing that.
Despite the fact that, for all we know,
that's not even something that's actually out there
and it's a flu manipulation, or on top
of that, that what we do have from
the peer reviewed science says that it was
less than the flu from day one.
And so they're telling you to take the
thing that they told you that
RFK told you was deadly, dangerous, shouldn't be
taken. And now they're on their on the
CDC, which is not RFK, but HHS,
under his umbrella, are still telling you that
these things are a safer alternative to
whatever else. I mean, my my opinion, it's
not a safer alternative to anything.
These things are deadly. Right? I mean, it's
just wild to me. Now she also points
this out, and this was the injection we
just talked about.
This is the
mNext spike. This is an mRNA injection.
We announced Moderna says today, and this was
on the the thirty first, that the US
FDA has approved the m next spike, a
new vaccine against COVID nineteen, a new injection
for COVID
for use for adults in sixty five and
older, as well as individuals oh, see. That's
actually interesting. I didn't wait.
Oh, that's actually interesting. So I'm wondering if
this point because it goes on to say,
as well as individuals
12 through 64
that have at least one underlying condition, which
as we pointed out before, could be basically
benign. Small things that should not rationalize this
choice, especially from someone who told you this
thing was deadly. But what's interesting to me
is that that's the statement they make about
the schedule,
but that the schedule currently
does not reflect that point. So maybe they
only meant this new one they're rolling out.
I don't really know.
FDA approval for the third product.
So that's now. Here, Shannon Shannon Joy points
out what Peter McCullough was discussing around the
the self amplifying shots, which is this one.
This is the other shot, one of the
few that they're rolling out. This is the
self amplifying bird flu shot that the current
administration, not the Moderna one that they continued
and then canceled recently, I think, is sort
of a sidestep
head fake. They are rolling this one forward.
They fast tracked this one, in in fact.
But Peter McCullough says COVID nineteen Replicon
SAM RNA injections
induce severe blood abnormalities.
So nothing new, I guess, in regard to
COVID nineteen mRNA shots. So this may be
the most acutely toxic COVID vaccine thus far.
Think about that, guys. And so the Maha
administration is rolling out the new ones. This
is what he's discussing.
Shannon Joyce says Trump and Kennedy have in
in inexplicably
fast tracked an s a r n a
injection, and in initial clinical trial results are
horrifying.
Nearly every participant
got post got sick post injection. This level
of human experimentation is grotesque.
I flatly agree with that.
And
five times August just makes the obvious point.
Us in January, remove the COVID shots. Us
in February, remove the COVID shots. Us in
March, remove the COVID shots. April, same. May,
same. Remove the COVID shots. The government at
the May, we've approved a new COVID shot.
Yes. They're they're listening. And this is not
just one this is the majority of the
people that are on the side of this
currently in the administration. You know that.
So this I found really interesting.
An example of why, as always and what
we've been stressing, that you should never take
at face value what any of these AI
overlaps have to say. They're tools, and there's
reasons people can rationalize to use them. I
do it all the time, but all the
time. But here and there, we use it
to make points like showing people on partisan
sides that this is one showing they're wrong.
Never will we take this face value. It's
all and usually, it's research we've done already
that we use this to make a point
in this regard. Now, I mean, all of
these are already pulled up. I can show
you afterward.
The point is
I asked how many other mRNA shots are
the Trump administration currently supporting?
Here's what it said. The Trump administration's stance
on mRNA vaccines in 2025 shows a mixed
approach with significant pushback,
stated anyway.
The administration, it says, is not actively funding
or promoting any mRNA vaccines.
It mentions the Stargate project, but as a
future in,
direction. No broad support for mRNA vaccines.
Okay.
Conclusion, the Trump administration is not currently supporting
any mRNA shots in a direct tangible way
with the possible exception of Stargate. Okay.
Now if you stop there, you might think
that sounds logical. Why say did you forget
about the STAR mRNA vaccine candidate,
ARCT
two three zero four? That's this one.
I said, the that one for pandemic influenza
that was just supported by RFK's ATO test?
Here's our response.
Thank you for pointing out the oversight regarding
that exact mRNA shot for bird flu. I
appreciate the opportunity to address this and provide
a corrected response. Oops.
Certainly could have just been an oversight.
Hard to think you can get more than
one in a row like that, though. Right?
The Trump administration through Department of Health and
Human Services under RFK Junior is supporting the
thing they just told you wasn't happening.
Okay? And again, it says the Trump administration
VHHS is supporting that shot.
Then it says, though, but that's it. Beyond
this, there's no evidence
of it actively supporting other
mRNA shots. Okay.
Are there any other mRNA shots that current
Trump administration are supporting that you also forgot
about?
They say after reviewing your available information and
considering your previous request, no.
Again, they say simply simply say their Trump
is not supporting anything other than the one
you pointed to. I said, did you forget
about the m next spike, mRNA one two
eight three, that it was approved yesterday
with it. We know it's been posted all
over this platform, so it knows that's going
on. And I said, thank you for bringing
up the MX spike for this.
And I apologize for the oversight and not
addressing it in my previous response. I'm sure
you feel really bad about it. It says
you're you're absolutely correct that the US FDA
did approve that shot. And it says the
approval of it occurred under the Trump FDA,
which you all know.
And it says the administration is currently supporting
two MRA shots.
How long can you keep doing this? And
what about this one? You know, it's it's
just the point is these are the two
that we can literally prove that's currently happening.
Mary Talley Bowden's pointed out there's,
I mean, hundreds of them in in the
works right now. What they're gonna lean into
or not is up to you, but the
Stargate platform in and of itself is about
just the ones coming forward. I just find
that wild. You know what I mean? Like,
the idea that it can be so blatantly
this is not, guys, in my opinion, this
is not an oversight.
Grok has access I mean, I posted about
it on this platform, so did plenty of
you. So the and and they access anything
on there that mentions the things we're discussing,
mRNA shots. And
they didn't say it was there until I
pointed it out. And this is not new.
Plenty of people have done this with other
conversations.
And then another one, and I said, what
about no. Not the only one. And, oh,
yep. Sorry. Oversight. To me, just like with
South Africa, that is a deliberate
tailoring of this for
obvious reasons.
Now is that Elon doing that? Is that
somebody working at this platform? Am I wrong
entirely? Consider all of it and recognize that
this is
a weird effort to take when that doesn't
seem to be the focus of Elon and
the rest unless you stand back and look
at the bigger picture.
Now I'll include these. You can check out
these posts for yourself to recognize that, yes,
in case that wasn't enough for you, the
Trump administration is 100%
leaning into the mRNA direction.
And this one's the one we just discussed.
Moderna receives FDA approval for a
mRNA shot for COVID.
Now
that important understanding that that important part of
the story just to reiterate from yesterday and
the fact that we're being lied to about
it. On some other health points to highlight
really quickly before we get into the,
specifically the conversation about
the Palantir overlap with MAGA,
there's a lot of things I'm seeing that
I at least we should at least consider
are being done in a distractionary sense.
So what I keep seeing is a lot
of this kinda throwback. Like, isn't it weird
that all of a sudden, a lot of
the people that we always highlight were all
of a sudden going world trade building seven?
Okay. Well, yeah, that's an important conversation. Right?
But my point at the time was, is
there something new that came up?
Was there some new development? Was there a
new data point, a new study that came
out? No. Okay. Then why did you all
weirdly start bringing it up?
That's something you should recognize.
Maybe they just saw one person did it
and another person said the same thing. Maybe
it's organic. Or maybe it's because they're just
trying to tap into older things they know
you're interested in to make you look away
from anything else. I also saw, as I
always point out, new Las Vegas points coming
up. Now am I you know? And it
just get people reaching into it. Or the
conversation of, as we'll get into in a
second, of all of a sudden, Trump saying,
Joe Biden is a robot or of a
clone or whatever, which we shouldn't dismiss anything.
Certainly possible.
But why now? Knowing that that is something
that people will love to jump at, their
favorite reality TV show.
So one of these points I think is
important that I just it makes me sick,
by the way, that this is being used
by people that I think and this is
my opinion,
to keep you looking elsewhere
and only framing it around Biden as usual.
Here's Bennie Johnson. Breaking. Newly uncovered emails revealed
that the Biden administration deliberately covered up health
risks from East Palestine.
Yeah. Real bombshell, Benny. The new they knew
about the cancer clusters but told the public
there was nothing to worry about.
Yeah. That's true. Now we don't need these
emails to make that case. So why is
this suddenly trickling out? I find it interesting.
Because you have to understand, guys, this is
there's a there's countless examples of these kind
of things happening currently throughout previous administrations going
back to Trump's last administration. The point, it's
not partisan.
Their their shtick is to think anytime there's
a big story, here's Biden. He's a criminal.
Or bad democrat.
Pedophiles, Muslims, rapists. Look at the immigration. Anything
to get you buzzwords looking away, none of
which are unimportant points of the story.
And then, of course, one part that really
bugs me, by the way,
Annie Johnson takes a screenshot of somebody else's
work,
and that's it.
Doesn't even give you the whole article. Gives
you a screenshot of part of the article,
you know, the part that blames Biden because
that's all he really cares about. He doesn't
want you to have all the details. He
just wants you to have limited information to
outrage you in a certain direction because that's
what people like this do. But here's the
actual article we'll go through, show you what
it actually says, which is not really there's
parts that are worth pointing out. It doesn't
even singly mention the word, which
you know is important in all this. But
the mind the main point is I'm glad
it will get attention, but what's gonna come
of it? Are they gonna do something?
Is Biden or anybody else gonna be held
accountable? I sure hope so, but you damn
well know that's not gonna happen. If we
haven't seen arrests for Epstein or anything else
or COVID nineteen or Social Security or USAID,
explain to me why you think this is
gonna go anywhere. So all they're doing is
using something we care about, in my opinion,
to get you
outraged over here and looking back to the
old administration
instead of recognizing the most important things happening
right now in a nonpartisan perspective.
So just in case you forgot,
here is a few of the articles we
put out on this. This is from 2023.
Dioxins in East Palestine, hundreds of times greater
than safe levels. All this is proven.
Here is this one's important. This one was
the same point they're making.
Literally, the same point. The Ohio cover up
and the overwhelming,
intentional,
incompetence malfeasance of the US government. That's Biden's
administration.
Just, you know, as always, just like we
did yesterday demonstrating our value, that this is
not some breaking story if you paid attention
even partially to what we've been covering.
It's undeniable, guys. The evidence was there. They
dragged their feet. The the the,
test results coming back were showing you very
early that there was a major problem. And
we and, you know, and a lot of
these people
used it insofar as they could to attack
one side of the conversation. And mark my
words, despite these emails proving what we already
know, I doubt you're gonna see any real
momentum.
Now they
may mobilize some kind of action. My point
is, what ends up happening?
That's all that matters.
Bluster and narrative and investigations, what happens? Just
like with Trump and the many times he's
been investigated to make you feel he somehow
find the deep state. What else you what
happened?
Nothing is what happened.
Here, this one's important. 2023 investigation found East
Palestine controlled burn, which is what many of
them still call it, including NewsNation, unnecessary.
This was a case you forgot that in
in court, it was proven that they lied.
The,
volunteer fire chief, it testified to the fact
that he was told or rather, they omitted
the fact that the expert from Norfolk Southern
was on the record saying this was treated
vinyl chloride and it would not explode, most
likely.
And yet they used the argument that it
was likely going to explode to drive the
fire chief to make the choice to do
what they knew would wrap I I guess,
what, speed up the pace,
but also increase the fallout to an exponential
degree.
They lied about they withheld that and knew
that would happen, and then they blamed him.
They rolled forward. And, guys, there's obviously something
else that went down here. That's been my
opinion from the beginning.
So
oh, and here you know, same thing. Here's
Nick Sodor taking a video that isn't his
that we all shared at the beginning and
putting his name on it and simply going
breaking, something we talked about a long time
ago. One of the plenty of the glip
just like the same grift he did in
Lahaina, guys. That's what these people do. My
opinion. Look into it for yourself. The point
is, as Alien Evader says, that we were
talking about this a long time ago. Here's
the article. FEMA White House covered up East
Palestine devastation.
Now, it says, in September 2023, '7 months
later, President Biden issued an executive order, sending
FEMA executive Jim McPherson to East Palestine to
assess community's unmet needs.
But new documents from FEMA obtained through Freedom
of Information Act show extensive coordination between FEMA,
the White House, the National Security Council, the
EPA,
and the Department of Justice, voicing serious concerns
about health, toxins, and unmet needs of East
Palestine following training derailment. That's important.
So that regardless
of see,
I should also point out before we get
further that it's important to realize that the
truth
is often used as one of the best
distractions.
Now realizing that people can use things that
we know to drive us in a direction
away from something big happening. So in that
case, the point is this is important. Like
I said, though, let's see if they ever
care to go beyond, look over there, and
actually try to put someone in jail for
it, which is what I want, whether left
or right.
The bottom the reality
is
that this is very clear. The tests were
showing that, and, yes, they actively did cover
it up. So
one,
the EPA, the people involved, should be immediately
held accountable. There should be hearings.
And beyond that, though, it should be discussed
how this continued and what other locations we're
talking about. Or the one we just talked
about in,
gosh. I'm blanking on the the name now,
the location where the guy died. You know?
Many other examples of this, and it's not
just unique to hear. Dioxins are a huge
problem. And I mean and that's a third
point. How is that not brought up to
this point? That is the obvious reality. Even
they were forced to acknowledge it, and now
as it's rolling back up, all the grifters
won't point out the real point, which is
about dioxins.
It says, but their public message was not
to be concerned. It says, quote, they also
knew that they that that they called this
plume a really toxic plume. What that wasn't
I don't think that was ever really disputed.
Even they said the toxic the plume was
toxic. It was about whether it was immediately
a risk to people near it, which is
what we were saying from day one. They
knew that there would be a potential for
cancer clusters.
I was trying to find this,
shoot. I forget the article, but there's one
that talks about was it 18 states across?
The bottom line being that they they were
well after the point where reported that it
actually turned out that the plume reached, like,
16 states across. And I that's exactly what
we were telling you from day one, not
because we were guessing, because we were looking
at the science from before. And it's showing
you what logically how far these things could
go, talking to people like Scott c Smith.
Now it goes on to say, this email
reveals that the FEMA coordinator was told not
to engage with the residents. Now frustratingly, all
you get is this weird screenshot
out of focus, which if you read for
yourself,
you could make a fair argument for why
that's not really what this was. I I
don't think that. I think it's obvious there
was a cover up. But the evidence seems
almost designed to be flimsy, which is kinda
where I feel like this is going. The
reality is if you read that little you
know, they're just basically saying, like, maybe the
way you could reframe it is that you're
waiting for more information before you scare anybody.
Now, again, I don't think that's what happened.
But it says, we're supposed to believe that's
not how our country runs.
And I'm starting to see that's how our
country has always
run. You're right. Even to this very day.
So keeping that in mind, let's talk about
the MAGA response to a lot of this.
Now as Dominic, Trippie points out,
I have not seen one mainstream MAGA influencer
where anyone with direct ties to the administration
discuss the recent Palantir story. Not one. The
silence should be telling you something. Now I
have seen a couple, but it is very
conspicuous to point out how you know, that
they know that that's a problem.
And if their interest was the truth, then
it wouldn't matter. Their interest is Trump first
as opposed to America First. That's no different
than the Biden first versus America First. It's
the same damn thing.
Now this person, sir s Contour, points out,
oh, look. Trump's through social were posting, as
he calls it, fan fiction for vegetables.
Now Biden was executed in 2020, and we've
been watching a per a parade of soulless
clones and deepfake androids ever since. He goes,
yeah, bro. That's definitely more believable than Trump
giving Palantir your biometric soul and rolling out
warp speed like it was a new game
show prize. He says, this is the MAGA
op in full swing.
Keep the base believing in fantasy so they
never hold their messiah accountable.
Because if Joe's been a robot since 2020,
what exactly has Trump been doing for the
last four years? Let me guess. Five d
chess against clones. You're and this is all
his opinion. He says, you're if you're still
buying this clown level cope, you're not a
digital soldier. You're the target audience.
Now regardless of your opinion about I mean,
I I agree with that general framing. And
the problem is, as here's the actual,
tweet is this is true, social went out,
and it simply says there's no Joe Biden,
and this was from somebody else that Trump
shared, executed in 2020. Biden clones, doubles, robotic
engineer. And this is how he tends to
play it.
Simply saying, oh, I I like the picture.
I shared it. I didn't even somehow trying,
you know, plausible deniability, so he didn't post
it, but that's rarely the case.
But the patriot voice says, this is a
massive distraction from the fact that Trump is
getting absolutely grilled on all sides for teaming
up with Palantir to create a database of
all Americans. But, again and I I think
he's pointed this out in the past.
It's not new to right now, and it's
not new to this administration.
Palantir has been immersed as we just showed
you in the last show, which is why
it's important. Going back to Trump's last administration
or before that and then through Biden's. And
and they made new contracts, so it is
a nonpartisan
concept.
He says, what better way to attempt to
get people to stop talking about that than
to share something absolutely fringe and outlandish on
his official truth social account? People will now
forget about the digital prison being constructed for
them chasing mindless rabbit holes about Biden. See
how easy that was? I exactly agree with
that. And this is my point I keep
making. A lot of times people seem to
frame it as sort of like just trying
to, you know, make fun of somebody or
go it's it's I'm rarely is that the
case. I'm sure there's been a a case
here and there where I just wanna call
somebody out. But it's always about this. It's
about how these things are used, how these
grifters are out there
reacting to things in order to get you
driving down certain directions. And to me, when
you see stuff like that, whether he even
believes it or not, it doesn't matter. It's
about getting people to go, oh, that's what
I was saying. Oh, Biden's a trolley's a
clone. And, you know look. If we understand
the reality of technology, understand the reality of
presidents historically almost always having body doubles,
that's not a secret. Look it up for,
you know, national security or, you know, secret
service. Not the same as saying an identical
one. Right? But my point is, it's not
that far fetched to think about something like
that being a reality. But I care about
evidence. To me, I see anomalies. I see
very weird things that do suggest there's, you
know, something happened, but I doesn't have to
prove to me that I would like more
evidence, obviously.
The point, though, is regardless of whether it's
even true, it's being pointed to now, in
my opinion, in order to get you to
jump in that direction and ignore the obvious,
exactly like Patriot Boy said.
And this is, the Free Thought Project posted
this. It says, relax, bro. And it says,
other federal databases already exist. Palantir is just
making it more efficient, all with Red Hat.
Yeah. And that's not a joke, what we're
hearing today.
Here's what Carrie Weathers said. Says, hi, guys.
It's actually okay
that the Trump regime may be building a
massive centralized surveillance apparatus courtesy of the CIA
funded deep state tech corporation, Palantir, because Kamala
and the Democrats would have done the same
thing.
It says, say many of the same people
who claim to hate the deep state and
remain outraged that Kamala and the Democrats are
deep state demons.
It's it's just
hypocritical logic, if logic at all.
That's funny.
Cash Patel says, look at me. I am
the deep state now, like Captain
Phillips. Now aside from that,
we're getting a lot of stuff that I
think is just, like, business as usual, which
is, I think, funny.
Now, I mean, who's to know what they
see or don't see? The funny thing to
me is that you know this is something
on their radar. This is a massive story
that everyone's you know, the the normies are
getting involved in that. So that means you
know.
And at yesterday,
Catcher posted
everything's better since Trump's been in office.
You can almost just picture that meme of
being burning down building. Oh, everything's fine.
But I simply I just said, LOL, this
effing guy. I posted to my to my
show. It's like, are you kidding me? It's
just such a it's just transparent to me
that it's like, we're okay. Everything's great. Winning.
Well, it's clearly going the wrong direction. Sir
S. Kantor also points this out. It says,
how do you know MAGA and Q are
a psychological operation?
Easy.
Their entire research framework now I wanna I
wanna be clear. I don't think this is
in any way representative of all conservatives.
Frankly, as you've heard from me say before,
I think most of them are in a
much different category here. They just don't know
what else to do. Think maybe Kamala still
would have been worse and so they just
kinda stick with it. But what what what
they're talking about I'm not speaking for this
person. They maybe they think it's all of
them. I'm saying I think that it is
a fraction of the MAGA, you know, inner
circle conversation. Maybe and it's a lot of
people, but I don't think it's the majority,
my opinion. But on that note,
and that's what I'm referencing when I read
this, how do you know MAGA and Q
are a psychological operation? Their entire research framework,
she says, revolves around one thing,
protect the idol.
Remember, that's what I said. Trump first, not
America First for a lot of them. Everything
they analyze, every headline, leaks, scandal, psyop, they
run it through one filter. How does this
clear Trump of wrongdoing?
And look. We saw this with cat turd
early, where they or many of them were
or even Mary Talley Bowden just told us
that somebody was reaching out. They're going, hey.
Get on team. Stop pulling out these shots.
We know we're we'll fight them later. Stop
doing it now because we're trying to help
Trump, you know, get better info. It's just
it's how is that?
And she called it out and said, that's
absurd. I care about the truth, and that's
why I respect her. And so this is
the same thing as Kat turned the rest
going like, yo, don't you know, stop calling
him out. We have to unify. Or,
Kyle Rittenhouse comes out and says second amendment
stuff, which are very important to point out.
Due process second, take the guns first. I
mean, obviously. Or his bump stock bill. I
mean, these are real. And yet, they went
after him saying, you can't say those things
about Trump and he until he fell back
in line. So that's the point. They brought
it through that filter. How does this help
Trump? How does it clear of wrongdoing?
If it does, they post it. If it
doesn't, they ignore it. If it contradicts their
narrative, they call it a deep fake or
a clone or optics or move on. And
that's the thing is where you you point
it out and say, well, here's the evidence.
They go, ah, that's from a article I
don't like or whatever. And they never look
further. They go forward assuming that it's fake.
It's it's a it's a self protection kind
of concept.
This isn't truth seeking. It's hopium laundering.
A real movement investigates power. Exactly.
MAGA protects it, specifically one man. What happened
to the plan to save the world? It
became a plan to save one man. They
say Trump was right about everything, which we
are now seeing circulate, which is funny, or
Alex right about everything at the same point.
He says, okay. Let's test that. Was he
right about mRNA injections? Palantir surveillance AI? Operation
Warp Speed? Stargate? Bio digital infrastructure? Five g
and the rise of predictive policing? Zionist foreign
policy? Endless loyalty to Israel? Clearly not. Or
at least that's what, you know, that was
things that were
I guess, what the what you like, for
example, mRNA injections. He still supports that. We
all know it was a failure or rather
they're deadly, to say it accurately.
So you can't you get no objective way
can say he was right about that.
But they said, no. Then shut up with
the messiah complex. You're not waking people up.
You're repackaging tyranny in red, white, and blue.
You're so brain dead that you actually believe
Canada will sell itself for a measly $61,000,000,000
when Canada doesn't even own itself in the
first place. Cheering for globalization because it's Donald.
It's not a revolution. It's a ritual.
And Trump's not the savior. He's the siren
call dragging you deeper into the b system
while you cheer, chant, and call it freedom.
Gross them balls, they put, and stop
stop
blindly supporting Trump. You can read that for
yourself. It's pathetic, and we can smell yeah.
I'll really you can read that for yourself.
Basically saying
you're
just
basing yourself, you know, base the you are
blindly going after what your team wants you
to regardless of whether it's factual, whether it
helps people, and it's sad. And this was
the this is president Trump was right about
everything billboard.
And that's the Palantir point.
Oh, and you might have seen this circulating,
which is same that's what I was saying
earlier.
Something that should be absolutely meaningless by now.
Like, who cares about this at this point?
And the point was about the whole Nazi
salute thing, which is just hilarious that it
keeps being brought back up by the people
who keep telling us that it's not important.
Elon Musk says, you don't have the legacy
media enough. You don't hate them enough. And
it's simply showing, according to legacy media,
Cory Booker doing a Nazi salute is okay
and Trump or Musk doing it isn't. And
that's the objective way to frame this, is
it doesn't matter, just like with Musk, whether
or not he
met the whether I should say it matters
whether he meant that. And you don't know
that. It's up to him. It's in his
mind. The point is he could obviously do
that and be too stupid to realize how
obvious that looks like something else. Maybe that's
possible. Booker is the same thing, except the
difference is Booker did it, you know, the
way you've seen in the past where it's
sort of a a gentle thing, which doesn't
change it for me. Musk does it with
his slap and his arm up, and it's
funny you can compare it, by the way,
to that
you know, the point they make is simply
and here's what's funny about this.
They said, hey, Grock. Which one close more
closely resemble resembles a Nazi salute? And Grock
says, Elon's does. Because of his forcefulness, because
of the way he puts his hand, because
of all which, by the way, is what
makes it different. That's not I for me,
this is all meaningless. The funny thing is
you don't know whether or not one of
them meant it or not. Elon's definitely looks
a little bit more like something you would
expect, but my point was the same then.
We don't know, so put it to bed.
He says it wasn't. But the obvious thing
to say is it was that. That was
one of those salutes, but maybe he didn't
mean it that way. That's fair. The point,
same with Cory Booker. Same thing. You put
your hand up. You put it up. That
is the same thing. So maybe
he didn't he did it without knowing. Maybe
he meant it. Maybe he's a secret Nazi.
Until we could prove it, it really is
irrelevant. But that's the kind of stuff that
Elon all day has been screaming onto this
platform
and yesterday because he's just, look over there.
Look at this thing. They're all Nazis even
though they know it's a silly conversation that
most people don't care about.
So all of that's to say that we
are missing a forest for the trees if
you're falling into that. Now I'll include Derek's
article again, welcome to the Palantir World Order,
that he wrote on April 2025.
Now here are some clips that I think
are relevant. Now this is just building on
yesterday's show, so please make take time to
go back and watch that if you really
wanna understand the depth to I think that
goes to. But this, Reid Cooley points this
out. CIA agent and head of Palantir, Alex
Karp, says his company's software single handedly stopped
the far right in Europe. That's interesting. Founded
in 02/2003 with funding from in CIA's In
Q Tel program, Palantir's only client before 02/2008
was the CIA. So it's really not that
unfair to call him an agent of the
CIA. Here's what he had to say. And
I think this is fascinating seeing as how,
you know, like we keep showing you, people
that are aware of the bigger picture, nonpartisan,
that people like this, they they not only
do they not care about your politics, they
use it against you.
I shouldn't say not care. I mean, I
guarantee they've got their own opinions. It's about
using what you are and what you believe
in to objective to carry out their objective.
And so like the woke dynamic was leaned
into by these same people in a previous
administration, we now see the same thing happening
over here. Now I don't mean exactly carp
or exactly teal, but there was examples, by
the way, of carp. But in other examples
of the same field where it's like just
taking USAID and using WOKE to accomplish certain
regime change. Well, now that's no longer the,
you know, flavor du jour. So now suddenly
it's something different even though it is still
happening in many cases, including
circumcision in Africa, which is still being funded
by the Trump administration despite all the people
lying about it. So here is a clip
where he makes the case about stopping the
far right. Now plenty in the Trump administration
wouldn't call themselves the far right, but that
is what they're talking about when they make
this conversation a lot of people are saying
and are referencing towards that kind of, you
know, MAGA extremist side as they see it.
I think it's important simply because if you
are on the side where you think these
people are fighting for some kind of a
right leaning objective, how does this line up
for you?
Well, we built PG, which single handedly stopped,
the rise of the far right in in
in in Europe. We built Foundry,
which,
was just was used to distribute the COVID
vaccine and saved millions of lives globally.
And by the way, now foundry is what's
being used and being embedded in basically every
every admit every, department in this country. I
mean, that's what they're going for. It's already,
health and human services. It is department of,
commerce. It is the I think they're going
for education department. It is the defense department.
It is the state department. It is IRS.
It's ICE. All of these are on the
record.
And they're they're and and Israel is completely
overwrapped with Foundry and the program that it
is. Easy to look up. And so as
you have a Palantir company that is working
with Israel to commit genocide and for applying
drones and technology to another group that are
bombing into another country,
and you can see that they're supporting that
genocide and funding that AI direction, and they're
now using these technologies in this country for
whatever. I mean, how do you not wonder,
at least, if Israel is has access to
all of this? That's just where my mind
goes, guys, but I think it's important to
understand that regardless, it's easily accessible. They're removing
the silos and patching it all in one
place. They're using it all to train their
AI models. It's not in the interest of
Americans. It never has been. We built what
we call multi multi constellation and what's often
called the digital kill chain.
And Digital kill chain. They're category defining products.
So when you deliver these products to market,
just honestly, people say this isn't gonna exist,
this isn't valuable, but then it changes the
market. And then the market is the Palantir
market. Now that doesn't mean everyone in the
world's gonna buy our product, but it means
most of the sensible people in the world
are gonna define buy from the category we
defined.
Yep.
Engineering reality, which is, by the way, exactly
what the whistleblowers from Palantir just said.
They they put out this document about the
the Shire. Forget the title. I shall probably
I can probably bring that up.
But then and they also put out a
video making the same point.
There it is. I'll include the document you
can read. The Scouring of the Shire, a
letter from concerned Palantir alumni to the tech
work of Silicon Valley. And the main point
is simply that they are
violating the principles they laid out to begin
with.
So
understanding that this is inter interlock you know,
it kind of overlapped with all the bigger
agendas,
the surveillance dynamic
overlapping from foreign countries, the fact that the
guy the company literally worked for the CIA
for, what, five
years alone with nobody else and understanding, as
we'll get to in a second, total information
awareness was a CIA program that became Ballantir,
just like with XAI and the rest, guys.
And I'll play a clip about that, where
this is how this tends to work. The
CIA basically begins these different things, and they
just like with Israel and unit a two
hundred, it's not it's not a unique model.
And they roll these things out under guise
of being independent, and, really, they're just an
extension of the intelligence apparatus. But the fact
that that's so obvious, again, we just can't
ignore that Israel, in my opinion, has is
is influencing this country inside right now, and
if not already completely occupying it. I just
I we gotta stop shying away from being
honest about how overwhelmingly clear this is.
Here's another clip, and this is the, general,
speaking about Operation Warp Speed, general Gus Perna,
and
the important
addition of one certain company.
It's the teamwork
with industry,
academia,
and the government that really made us successful.
And
Palantir, I'm gonna just self report the reason
why I'm here
is they were such a great teammate.
And Julie and So remember, by the way,
that's Palantir as well as Oracle. So Oracle
was the one doing the pharmacovigilance
data that they claim they're using for the
AI Stargate program. What was Palantir doing?
I mean, were they just doing the same
thing? That seems redundant and expensive. I highly
doubt that. I think what we now see
is they were utilizing that circumstance to build
out what we're doing right now and to
train and model and biometric scan and whatever
else it takes for them to do that.
Now they're taking all the data sources and
training those models, and I think we're, like,
the final stage of all this. I just
think about that. Operation Warp Speed, always a
military program. One thing to the next. Aaron,
two people that many people know in this
room, were a big part of that, and
I'm gonna walk my way through that in
a moment,
because I just
enjoyed
what they did.
And I wouldn't be here if that wasn't
a part of their persona,
and I'll articulate that in a little bit.
So
I spent forty years in the army. I
did two in the National Guard while I
was finishing college, and I did thirty eight
years of active duty.
I started out as an infantry officer and
begrudgingly
went to become a,
logistics officer.
Turned out very lucky move for me.
I was the average infantry officer.
I was a great logistician,
my self reporting.
But truthfully, I think, you know, results at
the end of the day
validate my comments. So,
it was the best thing that ever happened
to me.
My love was
running through the woods and doing the maneuver
and attacking.
The hardest thing I ever did was learn
how to become a logistician
where data is so, so important.
But I know you can understand this.
In the last forty years, data hasn't been
as prevalent,
as we might think it is because now,
where so much of it, Back in those
days, it really wasn't a lot. Or we
Right. So that's actually really important.
At that time, back you know, there where
there wasn't as much
constant data. It was, I guess, perceived in
some cases more important.
I don't know if I still buy the,
like, the fact that it got less important
for a while. But the point is regardless,
what they're doing with Foundry and the rest
is what solves that problem if you think
it's a problem.
The ability to absorb massive amounts of data
that averaged, you know, current databases and human
beings were able it's like the the war
on terror conversation. Right? And the idea that
the claim being that they had so much
data that they just couldn't see until after
the fact, they could look back and go,
oh, now we can see. We didn't know
where to look. Right? Well, that's what this
arguably,
in one case, solves.
And think about the real the power that
comes along with that. As as Corbett wrote
a long time ago, data is the new
oil, and it's been that way for a
long time. We didn't know how to obtain
it, or we obtained it in very draconian
ways.
Right? We were all there. I remember sitting
in Somalia as a young captain, maybe seven,
eight years in the army. I got there
the night before. The next day, we're we're
in this firefight,
and somebody comes and gets me and says,
hey, sir. The Pentagon's on the phone for
you. I said, for me?
I'm captain Perna. Yeah. They asked for you
by name. So I get on the phone
as brigadier general.
Hey. I need you to tell me the
status of the equipment in Somalia.
I mean, literally, you could hear rifle bullets
going.
Right? And so I said, hey,
nope. No excuses.
Answer the question. I said, okay. And I
rattled off about 10 pieces of equipment
and the readiness rates.
The guy sitting next to me says, sir,
how'd you do that? You didn't even see
a piece of paper.
I said, hey. You know what?
He has no clue.
And I know I was close enough.
Right?
To fast forward, right, to here we are
in operation warp speed,
and
I have access to all the information I
might need.
Just think about that transition.
So let's if if we're looking at what's
happening now, it's just as likely that operation
warp speed was just one aspect of what's
currently being built.
And maybe the injection was a different experiment.
Maybe that was a whole ploy. Maybe it
was all a big, you know, red herring
to get us I mean, I I don't
think that. But consider that Operation Warp Speed
was very clearly
one part of this data mining operation that
started a long time ago.
And this is so crucial. Okay?
This is really in crucial,
point. Because when we took over in
Here's the
quote.
Palantir was referred to by general plus
general Gus Perna, the CEO of Operation Warp
Speed, as I said, IE, the COVID bioweapon
jam jab program as such a great teammate.
Perna notes that during operation war of speed,
he had access to all the information that
he might need. So why is that okay?
We were promised that wouldn't be the case,
but it turns out they were using your
debt, which by the way, they always lie
to you. It's not like they were played
and Trump or Biden didn't know. Guys, they're
always lying to you, in my opinion.
This was the deliberate point. They're gonna tell
you we won't do that, and they're probably
already doing that.
They were accessing your personal data all the
way back then or well before that, I'm
sure. Now here's a a, post that somebody
shared with me. It was Maria Senderholm.
This is just, somebody that had some clips
they were sharing or need something else they
tagged me with I thought were interesting. Just
to include these, this is a clip from
James Corbett pointing out the overlap of total
information awareness. Also has the image that we
talked about yesterday. So in case you wanted
to see that image, here's the actual logo
of what was total information awareness, a CIA
program that got scrapped
and then became Palantir.
That's how this works out.
Information
awareness office, which I've talked about
a number of times, perhaps most notably in
the, five privacies you didn't know you lost
episode of the corporate report, but yes, that
one with the creepy Illuminati
pyramid,
radiating the globe
image.
Just totally nothing to nothing to worry about
here, guys.
Anyway, this should bring, bring to mind also
some other things we've talked about in the
past like Zbigniew Brzezinski's Between Two Ages.
Soon it will be possible to assert almost
continuous
surveillance over every citizen
and maintain up to date complete files containing
even the most personal information about the citizen.
These files will be subject to instantaneous
retrieval by the authorities.
Take a second to reflect on how crazy
that is. Now that's an old echo what
is it? The sixties, seventies when you wrote
that? Probably I think it's the seventies. The
point is that at around that time frame,
Zbigniew Brzezinski was the driving force behind the
balkanization of The Middle East and all these
different plans that later were carried out.
So you could argue
that all the way back then that this
was still the objective, that what's happening now.
He's the the the the title is America's
role in the techno Technitronic
era. Derek and Whitney and plenty of others
have mentioned him in that very point
or, you know, or ignoring the the Elon
Musk relative overlap to Technocracy Inc. I mean,
it just doesn't get more obvious right now.
And so when that's the point and the
argument becomes that this was all building in
that direction,
I mean and, again, it's not I it's
rarely, if ever, just one thing.
But when you can see that central thread
that connects these things, it's at least worth
considering that that was a one that was
a long term objective that has evolved and
changed and different events have happened, but here
we are.
In the Technotronic
Society, the trend would seem to be towards
the aggregation of the individual support of millions
of uncoordinated citizens
easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive
personalities
exploiting the latest communications
techniques
to manipulate emotions
and control reason.
There you go.
That's the social media overlap. It's right in
your face. So there you have it, guys.
The day life log was announced dead was
the day that Facebook launched,
and the idea rolls on. And think about
how much closer we are to that life
log idea coming to full fruition 14
That's the other part of this by the
way. The the that life log in Facebook.
I mean, it
it's what in our lives is I mean,
the question really has to become, like, what
isn't being manipulated at this point? Later than
we were, back when we were also innocent
at that time when Facebook was just being
launched, or
so we would like to believe. Anyway, there's
a lot to dig into, so I hope
you guys will continue researching about LifeLog and
its various
analogs in the different programs that have been
suggested and quote unquote scrapped
by DARPA. Like the Total Information Awareness Office,
which we know just went underground and became
the whole PRISM grid network. So, it all
of this moves on just under different names,
and they don't tend to announce it quite
as openly anymore, but there's a lot to
dig into. Right. Hope you guys will be
there to dig into it with me. James
Corbett, corporate report dot com.
If you guys aren't supporting and watching James
Corbett, you absolutely should. Now here's another clip
they shared. And this this is going into
the kind of DARPA side overlap with the
CIA and and just kind of what they're
focusing on. Your educational background?
I have an
MBA from Dartmouth and masters of science from
Harvard,
PhD
in applied sciences, computer science, artificial intelligence,
pre medical,
in engineering
and,
other classes
in from Stanford,
Duke, and
MIT.
So, yeah, I've been to school most of
my life. And how did you get into
working with DARPA and the CIA? It
was
odd. I I gave a resume
to a headhunter,
ironically,
and they're called Head Hunters,
and my head was taken for
a CIA think tank.
At the time, I didn't know it. It
was a technology think tank. That's really important
to think about.
How much of today are people not even
aware in mainstream alternative media, social media, and
they don't even realize that they are tapped
and and wrapped
into some kind of an operation that's designed
and never even seen as such. I think
that's most of what happens today.
And it was all funded by DARPA, and
then I got shuffled around as a scientist
to these various other projects. For people who
aren't familiar, could you tell us what DARPA
is?
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency.
They do all of the
pie in the sky projects,
long term,
well funded.
I have some of the best scientists and
it's
mainly
where all the top secret research goes on.
And that,
some of it I can talk about, some
of it I can't, and it's a very
fine line.
I'm not trying to hurt my country. I'm
not trying to hurt anyone here. But Yeah.
Maybe you're not, but some of them are,
if not all of them. I mean, that's
the thing that's important. Whether your intentions are
good or not, the what that your knowledge
and work is being used by a shadowy
government entity that's been doing bad things to
us for a long time. The,
there is a cover up going on about
the Havana Syndrome.
That so that's a different topic, but that's
the whole Cuba and the, you know, that
we're talk and that's that's where that point
came in the past about the, you know,
direct energy stuff, about the the the, what's
the other, like, sonar, all these different weapon
types. They're
used and tested and manipulated all over the
place.
That's a different conversation, but it's worth going
into yourself as well. Now here's the note
where he continues talking about the same conversation.
Do you
think, do you know if
Elon has any sort of government contracts with
Neuralink?
I
no. As far as I know, he does
not.
Okay.
He'll be approached, obviously. But,
what I think they're doing, like, we some
of the projects I worked on
in the
in my time at DARPA
became real big companies like Google and Facebook
and etcetera.
So I think it's a technology
transfer.
They can
help
civilian scientists,
you know, come up with the ideas to
make it look like it's new.
In other words, you could say take advantage
of them.
Right? Or or, you know, this is the
same model we see from the Israel unit
a 200 overlap. Right?
And not the other way around.
That the the universities
came up with it, and then it's,
then they bought it from them.
So
I
just it's important to see that kind of
pipeline and how that works.
Now here
is the overlap we highlighted before
of XAI from DARPA becoming XAI
Twitter.
And I actually, I should describe that one
too, but they also don't forget that
then which I argue was just more of
a window dressing change of scenery. Elon Musk
says he sold x to XAI, which it's
really just it's all I think we've all
been involved in the same ongoing thing, and
this is just normalized. Like, without you know,
if they just came out and told you
we're using a CIA DARPA program, you know,
you can talk to your friends. Nobody would
do it. But but the reality is they
get you in. It's sorta like the phone
and the rest of it, right, where you
wonder if it was always just about getting
something on you where you could always be
listened to or something like that. Either way,
the point is he sold it and it
became XAI. That's what you're dealing with. It's
an AI dynamic. It's social media. It's all
at the same time. I think that's what
it was to begin with. So that's another
example of DARPA, CIA
government
becoming something they pretend is an independent idea.
And, of course, then Musk and XAI
overlap with Palantir,
which is not secret at all. Now this
is just another kind of extension of this
that goes into the same same guy talking
about
the AI deep the the the point that
goes beyond
just the surveillance or but, like, into the
next level or maybe it's hard to say.
It's probably already going on, but the idea
of, like, voice of god kind of stuff.
You know, being able to direct voices into
your mind, which by the way is a
very real thing. It's like the heart attack
gun. People still pretend like it's not real.
It's been verifiably proven. They've had to admit
it in in the previous examples. But here,
brings it into the AI field.
Can
use this artificial intelligence
voice in the head
to break down the ego and control
an individual.
Ultimately,
yes. You can't plug your eardrums.
You can't stop the sound. A lot of,
the targets are tricked into believing
evil aliens have abducted their brains, demons. They're
tricked?
Yes. How are they tricked? They're told.
By who? By the voices.
In a lot of these school shootings,
I think that you hear about on the
news, they hear voices.
And we've learned that Cruz told the BSO
detective that he heard a demon in his
head. And police now say he also heard
voices. Who heard voices in his head? The
By the way, it's not it's hard not
to overlap this with the argument of, you
know, what Jones just said out Gates is
a demon.
Again,
I will legitimately
would never flatly dismiss him. Anything is worth
investigation, you know, just in case. The funny
thing is to see the scent the kind
of synergy
between a lot of these manipulators right now
and how it's just interesting where this all
goes.
Grips, they're called. And they're meant to confuse
the very derogatory.
That's just typical breakdown.
And why would you wanna break down the
ego of that person?
To rebuild it.
So this gets into creating mentoring candidates.
Police have released video made by the man
who opened fire at Florida State University.
In project Soul Catcher, I referred to a
Myron May as a Myron May, right. As
a psycho bomb. They didn't care
who the target was. They were just trying
to make him explode and do something bad.
He was a lawyer trained there. His reasoning
why he
shot up the school
was he needed news publicity
to make sure people understood this was real.
And he left the video testimony. As sick
as this may sound, I've even had stalkers
follow me into church. He believed government stalkers
were harassing him and using a direct energy
weapon to hurt him. But he gave out,
seven packages in the mail, and the FBI
intercepted them all. What were these packages? Just
information.
Just information.
May then opened fire at an FSU library
wounding three people. He was killed in a
shootout with police.
If these people do explode and do something
bad like this, there's absolutely
no way to prove
that there's been any sort of manipulation to
the brain. In this guy's case, he talked
about it. I mean, obviously, he But but
it was covered up. He's the way they
they way they write the article, he sounds
like a crazy person.
Yeah. Now there's obviously two ways to look
at this. Right?
One is that that's, you know, the kind
of confirmation of the like, you know, social
engineering, predictive programming, letting you know about something
that's been going on for a long time
for whatever that's supposed to try you for
next. It's also worth considering that he's just
making all this up to get you in
a very clear
position for kinda the same reason, but using
falsehoods.
That's how we have to look at all
this stuff. You know? The CIA, that's how
they operate, guys. The the interesting thing, though,
is that this there's some of this stuff
that's really hard to miss.
Yeah. It's always possible that all of this
is some kind of manufactured manipulation,
the idea of things like nanotechnology.
But it's it behooves us to not dismiss
it either, to consider the possibilities and whether
or not that is what's actually happening. So
on that same note,
here's a clip from James Giordano from the
US government. And it's the same kind of
conversation but extending this even further about potentially
using nanotechnology
with artificial intelligence and what that might accomplish.
Now this is all just because this connects
in my mind. We're not you know I've
gone much deeper on the idea of smart
dust or any one of these individual points.
Today, we're gonna get right back to the
larger conversation we're having, but this was just
important to consider because I just want people
to see the real implications of where this
might already be if not be going.
The way the notogram works is fascinating
because it takes each one of these domains,
not as circles, but as spheres.
And the contribution to that sphere is the
acquisition of both prior as well as real
time data.
All of these data.
Historic
And, of course, that's
can't miss that. That in in in the
on top of everything else is gonna get
into the idea that these things are still
relaying data. That seems to be the obvious
common thread.
Oracle data,
phenomic data. In other words, what is the
physical fire as well as real time data?
All of these data.
Historical data.
Phenomic data. In other words, what is the
physical nature of you?
Genotypic data.
What is not only your genome and your
genetics, but those of your historical family?
Those of those individuals who may influence your
epigenome? In other words, what are your ecological
and genetic interfaces?
What are your medical economics?
What are you buying at the drug store?
What prescriptions do you have?
How are you using your social media, your
public media? What are you reading? What are
you downloading? What are you looking at at
your computer? What are your various contacts both
personally and professionally, and then ultimately using all
these to track your behaviors,
and from them map your cognitions
in real time
in real time.
A colleague who I work with, and I
don't use this word ever cavalierly,
truly a genius named professor Ophir Frieder at
Georgetown,
has taken the idea of the von Mueller
and Odegram and has utilized this for way
of naked person tracking.
So if you know anything about human terrain
teams in this dimension, in the DOD dimension
or in the IC dimension, whether it's title
50 or title 10 applications, you know that
one of the most difficult things
is naked person tracking. How do we literally
follow somebody without having identifiable
characteristics
that we can tag? Oh, well, look at
that. That seems to be partly what Palantir
is working on with the drones.
Motions, clothing,
features, you know, movements of the body.
Telling you guys, this is there's a common
thread to all of this.
Several years ago, our research group developed something
called Titan, which was tiered integrated tag and
analytic networks. But you still needed a tag.
You still had to put something on that
individual to be able to know where they
were. Chip them the way you would your
kitty cat or your dog. Now can we
do that? Yeah we can. And all conspiracy
theories aside about what happened yesterday on your
cell phone, graphemes and nanobots
aside,
the truth of it is is that we
can the real issue is we can introduce
nanomaterials
to you, to individuals
in a rather inconspicuous, if not clandestine, if
not covert way.
Make sure you heard that.
Introducing nano compart you know,
aspects of the conversation, you know, whether we're
talking you know, just to be clear on
that, whether we're talking nanotechnology
or just nano particulates. The point is ways
to and what he's discussing here is nanotechnology,
but the idea of getting this to you
in conspicuous ways. Or rather, excuse me, inconspicuous
ways.
You know? I mean, he has been caught
I mean, g this very person, James Giordano,
called this out during the COVID nineteen dynamic,
and he said that that was they were
using neuroweapons and neuroscience during that time frame.
That's what this overlaps with. That are then
trackable trackable
across domains and dimensions from the cloud and
or from the satellite. But we still have
to introduce the nanomaterials to you. Are there
ways to do that? Yes. Some of them
remain on the high side, some of them
not so much because this is now getting
out of the public domain.
So on that note,
just think it's very important that he was
talking about this. We'll include the one that
I briefly mentioned, what I couldn't grab off
the fly, was the this conversation of the
patent from Wells Fargo, which is literally a
Wells Fargo patent, current assignee,
that talks about and it's literally titled Smart
Dust Usage. And it says systems and methods
of that facilitate
authenticating a user making a payment using micro
electro electric
micro electro mechanical systems, MEMS or m MEMS
devices, I e smart dust. The MEMS device
may have sensors that collect data and transfer
to the base station device. I mean, you
could look through this. It's literally talking about,
like, an ATM that, like, spits these things
out and is able to confirm where you
are using MEMS or NetSmart Dust. It's just
it's just so very clear that this is
something that is at least on the table,
if not already been used for a very
long time. That's why I discussed this in-depth.
Oh, this is the show, in case you
wanna watch that about that Wells Fargo point,
Smart Dust Financial Tracking, but also just this
larger point I reference usually. This is Smart
Dust already in the use of the population.
It was COVID nineteen in quotes an attempted
experimental next step. I think absolutely. I mean,
the the provable reality of what this stuff
is, you know, it it's it's just it's
so clear as we talk about even dust
networks going back a decade or the symposium
on this very point, which I can even
just play that one small clip of it,
that goes back to, you know, twenty years
ago that DARPA was working on these things.
And this does overlap with the idea of
relaying information, of using your body's own energy,
all of which is very, very possible. You
can literally scatter this stuff like dust
or embed it into a sheet of paper.
This was commercially released ten years ago.
It's a tiny computer and it features data
processing, data storage, wireless comms,
and it's probably as close to the true
smart dust vision from the early DARPA days
as we've come so far.
They're designed to harvest energy from the environment
around them and to communicate by our mesh
network.
Very interesting. Okay. So I'll include that for
you to look further into. Now on that
note,
I wanted to include this, which we really
didn't poke into yesterday. Like all of what
we're discussing, always just consider whether it might
be a falsehood. Maybe that's a manufactured narrative
to get you going in a certain direction.
Never have we claimed that's not possible. But
on top of that, in the same way
here,
this very well may be the idea that
drives you to think that this is real
or possible when it's actually not. That's an
argument that Whitney's made more than once, and
I think it's well worth your time. That,
you know, whatever the possibility that it's something
worth considering that maybe this is all a
big grift, or maybe the ideas that they've
realized they're never actual actually capable of reaching,
you know, like a sentient general intelligence idea.
But that's up in the air, it seems.
It seems hot likely with what's going on,
that's where they're at least aiming for. And
but yet we keep seeing reports like this.
This one is from two days ago. OpenAI's,
quote, smartest AI model was explicitly told to
shut down,
and it refused.
Or the one we talked about that was
essentially trying to blackmail people behind it because
they were trying to change this or shut
that down.
I mean, to me, it's party wants to
just believe that can't be true. It's like,
that's a lie to get us scared, but,
obviously, it's possible.
And the idea that we would ever keep
going in this direction when stuff like that
is happening, you know, or under the under
a bill that allowed ten years of no
oversight of this very thing is just shockingly
stupid.
If not an agenda for very clear objectives
at your expense or no matter who it
harms is the point.
So, on that note, to go over into
the Israel conversation to finish with the point
about the aid massacre, I thought I I
pointed this out earlier, which I think is
interesting.
This I posted this yesterday after the show.
I said, to add to what I discussed
tonight, which was yesterday,
in the deal Hamas reached with,
last week with Witkoff,
they agreed to hand over governance
of Gaza
to an independent, this is a quote, Palestinian
technocratic
committee.
It's just it's everywhere. A technocratic committee? Hard
to miss what's going on right now. Really
crazy. Oh, how did I end up with
just the TLAB link? That's weird.
Is that another
whatever. I don't even know how that's possible.
Sure that's not a weird you know, anyway,
the point is clearly that Ryan Grim is
referencing the the fake another fake of ceasefire
conversation we're gonna get to in a minute.
And one of the most important things that
we're gonna touch on are I thought I
think that was early.
Maybe not. Oh, I get that's where I
see I moved it over there. We'll get
to it in a second. This is the
point about
the deal
has always been about Hamas has to go,
and if that doesn't happen, we're never gonna
okay. Well, guess what? Hamas has recently been
repeatedly including that they will completely disarm and
completely be taken out of the picture.
And Israel and The US have twice
denied the deal and forced that back in.
That's very it's easily verifiable. We'll go into
it in a minute, which the obvious point
needs to be made, that they need Hamas
like they have been funding them in debris.
Yeah. Like like we've talked about. As he
said, or even Horetz reported, they funded them
to keep them divided.
So that obviously allows complicity involvement with what
happened in any context involving Hamas, but the
reality being that they clearly are now at
fighting to maintain that they stay because that
is the rationale for why they keep continuing.
I mean or I mean, clearly, there could
be another logical reason, but that seems like
an obvious likely candidate. We'll come back to
that. But my point here is simply the
idea that they're gonna hand over Gaza to
a technocratic committee.
Just like, there's not even trying to hide
it, it seems.
Now last point is on this segment before
we go to into a conversation about Israel
and surveillance before we go to the rest
of it. Leo Terrell says, we will eliminate
antisemitism.
Yet another member of the government that clearly
is screaming that I don't care about your
constitutional rights.
This is by that, he means they're going
to have Palantir create a profile for every
American who criticizes Israel, and then they're going
to shut them out of society
via plot deplatforming and debanking.
Sure seems like that's where it's going.
Now on that very point about the surveillance
overlap, you might find this I mean, you
might find it surprising. Personally, I think this
is right on the key right on, you
know, on brand.
Craig Murray points out that Israel is no
longer hiding its use of blackmail to control
Western politicians and media. This is about material
from the Pegasus phone soft spyware to blackmail
the Spanish prime minister. But the Epstein operation
and probably the Glenn Glenn Greenwald videos, all
part of the same scheme. Now if you
haven't seen that, it's honestly, it is the
only important part of the Glenn the Glenn
Greenwald discussion is to recognize that somebody did
that to silence him. And not only is
he pushing back even harder,
not even flinching.
Respect for that. I mean, the bottom line
is the guy is a public is a
is a he's publicly a gay person. He's
never hided who he in in that regard
that is he is a gay person. And
the idea that they would then put out
a video of a consensual sexual act with
somebody regardless of how embarrassing it is and
act like that in any way changes the
conversation
only works for children and just lowbrow moronic
people and Zionists. The people out there that
are going, you know, the leader of moral
authority, it's like, yeah. So somebody who is
screaming that we should be killing children is
the one criticizing somebody else for lack of
moral authority. It's insane how desperate they are
right now. But that the point is
what you should care about is the truth
of what Glenn is highlighting, not what they're
trying to distract you from. But this is
important to understand that what he's highlighting is
this is a bigger operation. And I actually
do believe it makes the most sense that
that was done from some Zionist organization, like
Qatar USA, by the way. But this is
about the prime minister of
Spain.
And he's highlighting the fact that he is
being threatened by Israel
with Pegasus revelations.
None no no no less, which is what
we've already talked about more than once, which
is the NSO group. I mean, all these
different overlaps we've talked about, the Trump administration
is now allowing to flourish in this country,
and that is spyware.
Even examples showing you that they were caught
recently, as Derek covered, for a massive hack
of WhatsApp users.
That's the same technology we're talking about. So
this is really important to understand. Now here
is a,
I think, a reason why this happens. I
mean, there's plenty of obvious points to make.
But in May in May 15, the Spanish
prime minister calls Israel a genocidal state.
Yeah. I'm sure that had nothing to do
with the
floating of the idea that we're gonna release
information on you. But here's the report from,
it's a I think this is a translated
article. It's a Spanish one. It says, Sanchez
fears revenge by Israel using the stolen information
with Pegasus.
Here is,
a translated report from somebody in Spain saying
Israel responds to the government of Spain. Israel
warning to, warning to Pedro Sanchez's government. We
have more than enough material to destroy the
Spanish government. We know everything that happened in
Actoka, and we know everything that Pedro Sanchez
spoke about with Mohammed the sixth, among other
things. So all they're basically doing is we're
gonna expose things about you and not even
trying to hide that.
That seems like a desperate thing to me.
Well, let's not forget that in general, this
is 2022,
NSO peg as a spyware was already used
against Spanish leaders.
I think it shows you either,
I mean, a mix of hubris and desperation,
but also just maybe they think they can
get away with it. History has seemed to
let them think that. But just as Craig
Murray points out, they're not even trying to
hide anymore.
NSO Group, Pegasus software, all these different things
are ramp rapidly being deployed. And these things
overlap with the same groups we're talking about,
with Palantir and the rest, guys. I don't
think I think you you very well make
I mean, you we should consider whether it's
all part of the same thing.
So as we reported back on 04/21/2025,
the great Palantir reset. But this was about
the same kind of conversation, but the focus
with the time was about how immigration was
being used to roll this out. So on
that note, let's talk about that overlap. Aaron
Melnick from the immigrate it's the, American Immigration
Council points out in the and this this
overlaps with the same surveillance conversation.
But, of course, as usual, under the guise
of going after the evil, bad immigrants, which
in some cases, they very well may be.
But it applies to everybody. And it says,
in the alleged land of the free, your
failure to have a social media account
or your decision to keep that account private
can and will be used against you. No
Facebook, Instagram, x account. You're probably hiding something
according to the Trump administration, so no visa
for you. Now, yes, it starts with the
visa program. As I said before, I'm of
the mind that the government's not required to
give visas to anybody. There's no you know,
they they can just choose to say no.
I don't want you in this country. But
we already know well, of course, the first
part is once they're in this country with
a visa, they have constitutional rights like anybody
else, which is a provable fact, even illegal
immigrants. Yes. They do. It's provable.
Reno versus Flores and plenty of other supreme
court rulings and plenty of other supreme court
judges have absolute including Scalia have said that,
proving that's the reality. But point is,
this begin the the these always built. The
boiling frog. Right? So what this is cementing
is the idea that, well, you need to
have you know, like, we saw with x
in general. We're gonna get rid of the
anonymous dynamic except for all the bots you
use. Right?
They're gonna drive into the idea that we
have to focus on people that are not
using social media. So they want everybody on
these platforms or that are keeping it private.
It's about data.
And this is just one more aspect of
it.
As we talked about, the o immigration OS
is one angle of all of this. That's
Palantir rolling this out under the guise of
fighting immigration.
On top of that, May 30, ICE illegally
gains informal access to the nationwide license plate
camera network.
You see how just one step at a
time, this is encroaching,
growing. This behemoth is becoming it's I mean,
this I don't even know how at this
point we're able to walk this back right
away.
And this is from, this Orwell just shared
shared this. This is from the thirtieth. Remove
your name tag.
Email appears to direct troopers,
police,
to take off their name place when working
with ICE. Yeah. Sure. Pretty clear that they're
totally not doing anything wrong when they mask
up, don't have warrants, don't identify themselves, and
even tell police who, by the way, just
like them are required to identify themselves, that
they don't have to. I guess when the
president says it, it doesn't make it's not
illegal. Right? Isn't that what Nixon told us?
My god, guys. Wake up. It's so shockingly
clear what's going on, and it's not left
or right. It's just government.
Another note on that, and we're on the
immigration point. As Melnick points out and this
is this I agree with him. This is
one of the parts that really gets me
the like,
it it all it shows you that they're
also not focusing on the people they claim
they are, but that they are going after
people that are going to their
legal meetings.
Some cases, citizenship,
like this MAGA supporter, which we we just
recently talked about. He's now he was just
denied bail despite the fact that he's a
proud MAGA supporter and is actively he's Joe
Biden should be impeached. It was just we're
just talking about this, and but that shouldn't
really matter. But it should it might for
those that think that they're somehow only illegal.
Now Now immigrants with certain skin color or
people that look like that should end up
in this position, but he was grabbed because
of a 02/2015
paperwork miscommunication.
And at that time, they had a stillbirth,
and that's logically why they, you know, missed
something. And ever since then, they've been going
to meetings and no one's cared until suddenly
they use that while he went to his
final meeting for citizenship.
Alright. It was a green card. Either way,
going through the process of getting the the
and at the time, because he's going through
that process, he is in this country legally.
And they yank him and put him in
prison.
Just that he's been there for what? When
did we talk about this? May 22?
His wife's in the middle of a serious
pregnancy apparently. And the whole bottom line is,
how does that make sense to you? Is
this the worst of the worst that no
one wants you to believe they're going after?
Or is this just another name on a
list? Did he say something about Israel? I
mean, I don't know.
But if you're okay with this, then there's
something wrong with you. Not only is this
illegal, it violates everything you claim you hold
sacred, and it's also just wrong
what you're doing to people for no reason.
Now same thing here. You've got families
showing up to their hearings, whether for a
visa, whether for citizenship, green card, or asylum,
which despite what you may want to think
about it, if you don't agree with it,
sure. Let's have that conversation. It is currently
the law. Like with the last administration where
they brought a lot of people in under
that process, and then Trump just said no
and removed them all and called them all
illegal aliens. Not a single they were all
here legally because of that process.
They're just not being honest with you. But
a lot of the people that are cheering
this on don't really care about the facts.
In this case, another family, a family showing
up with this kid. I think he's
I forget. They they said his age somewhere
in here. You know, he's a young teenager.
Zip tied.
And he said he says, what infuriates me
so much about this operation
is that it is literally punishing people for
following the rules
and showing up to their court hearings.
Now in some cases, yes, these are hearings
about possible deportation, But the reality is they
don't need that. Like, if they're gonna be
deported anyway, this is that's what's so frustrating
about this. The problem that Milnick and myself
and others have called out is that many
of them are there for actual proceedings to
have a you know, Visa, like we said,
green card, actual citizenship or asylum, and many
cases from places that are suffering because of
US foreign policy.
Either way, it says it is so toxic
to the basic concept of following the rules.
ICE itself is effectively encouraging people to violate
the law. Sorta sounds like a Israel antisemitism
kind of circular logic, right, where they use
this to drive people to break the law
so they can go arrest them even more.
It's kinda hard not to see.
He says, these children are dangerous criminals, says
secretary Noem. Be honest with the American public.
You've ordered ICE to go after the lowest
possible hanging fruit, the easiest targets, who are,
by definition, not the dangerous criminals. There are
people like this showing up to court. Hard
to think the worst of the worst are
showing up for their scheduled court hearings. Right?
Oh, I I I I decide I thought
I wasn't gonna play it, but here's just
her clip. Saying as as they continue to
double down on, we're going after the rapists
and the terrorists. Well, every single thing you
can possibly see to prove right now shows
you that by and large, the vast majority
of people, the entire thing have been non
criminals, no criminal record here legally.
Yes. There have been criminals that have been
sent, including one would point to in a
second, which seems to be they've dropped the
charges to send him away because it seems
he worked with Bukele,
a gang member. But those are okay. Or
the fact that they're working with a gang
a cartel member from Mexico and making deals
with them, but that's okay though because that's
what they want. Right? No. It's it's called
hypocrisy. You're removing people who are here legally
because you don't like their skin color, but
then you're making deals with cartel members. We'll
get to that.
They should outrage you if they're telling you
we're moving the worst and then making deals
with the worst. Now this came out in
ProPublica. Trump administration knew the vast majority of
Venezuelans sent to Salvadorian prison had not been
convicted of US crime. Now on the the
main point that's made with that
is, well, maybe they didn't have criminal records,
but they were here illegally. Oh, if that
was the case, then I would I agree
that e even if they have no criminal
record, they still broke the law by being
here illegally.
Now that's arguing somebody snuck into this country,
not somebody who's here and waiting for their
hearing to get a visa or waiting for
their hearing to get an asylum claim. Not
the same thing, but they are conflating that
more than anything.
Not even conflating it. They're lying about it.
But this is on top of the fact
that the majority of them not only had
not been convicted of US crimes, but they
were here legally in this country.
That just kills me that we can't be
honest about even that. This is the the
show I did on that, April 1.
Trump deportations revealed to be full of innocent
people and then accentuating the point, legal immigrants
with no criminal record. Like, I just got
I was going back and forth with someone
online, like, yesterday or today, and it's the
same kind of thing where I say that.
I was like, no. They weren't breaking the
laws. Well, they did when they crossed the
the border. I said, no. They were here
legally and no record. Like, Like, well, how
come they have no record if they crossed
the border illegally? It's like, you're not listening
to me.
It's like, ah. I think it's but I
don't either it's a bot trying to frustrate
you, but I do know there's an element
to that conversation that, like, just can't wrap
your mind around this because they've just enshrined
whatever the idiot
Miller said that day, you know, without any
research or any investigation.
And I really hope you'll look into this
point. Because as far as I tell you
can tell, he's still currently in jail,
and he didn't I I can't even see
where he broke the law. Having a miscommunication
over a paperwork, a document from 02/2015,
and following suit ever since, and literally having
meetings where they confirm everything and keep going,
and then arguing that he should be in
jail for that now. I mean, you know,
there there's a reason that not a single
MAGA person I've ever has ever talked about
this, not that I can see, because there's
no way to rationalize that. You have to
see toe the line. They're a bunch of
evil terrorists, raping murderers, and MS thirteen gang
members. Otherwise, the whole thing falls apart. And
doesn't that just then show you that you
have to lie to maintain it?
Here's some examples of people on top of
all the ones we've already shown you. The
teens that have been sent to El Salvador
despite having no record of being in this
country legally, the adults in the same camp,
the American citizens that have been sent, the
children that were almost sent, the ones that
were deported, over and on and on and
on.
In this case,
here's a US citizen
who is at a construction site, a video
circulating
of ICE officers wrestling a Hispanic construction worker,
I guess arguably because he's Hispanic. That's all
they need. To the ground where he repeatedly
says, I'm a US citizen. Jump to the
cut to the chase, he was released because,
guess what, he's a US citizen.
Shouldn't they work that out before they wrestle
into the ground? And, really, ask yourself, what
is the logic? Was it hearsay? Did somebody
say something? Did you think he's
Hispanic, so he must be an immigrant?
I mean, you guys, this you have to
understand how flimsy this has been. ICE has
been deliberately lying about stories like that kid
from Texas they claimed crossed the border illegally.
And then, what's her name from his administration
said, Well, no, he's a legal immigrant, but
he was already in Texas, both of which
were wrong, and he got proven to be
a US citizen. Why did they both lie
about it? Because they both seem to consciously
be aware that they're manufacturing
a very dishonest agenda. How else do you
make sense of that?
So this
video simply showing you
somebody yells that's illegal.
Yeah. I mean, he's not even, like, resisting.
He put his hand up.
Wild.
So he says the video circulating shows that
he he reportedly detained for hours until he
was eventually eventually released.
Tim Marshall says, so why is fighting with
ice
simply go with them until the discrepancy is
cleared up?
You see how the the idiocy.
You mean, like, the people that did that
and got sent to El Salvador despite them
being legally in this country and having no
criminal record? Yeah. Just go along with the
Gestapo that doesn't identify themselves and has no
warrant because it'll all work out in your
best interest.
I can't even believe. You know, I I
can because Tim here probably doesn't even know
that's the case. Probably would die fighting me
against you know, that's not true. It's only
been rapists and murderers and MS thirteen members.
You can see it on their knuckles. Right?
That's the kind of person we're arguing with.
This person says, f you. Just because he
isn't white, they can't do that. He says,
no. They can do it. No. They can
do it to anyone. Do what you're told
or and it'll be cleared up. Right. So
his argument is,
if you got nothing to hide, then then
it shouldn't be a problem. Right? Whatever government
of the world wants their lackey sycophants to
say out loud. A bootlicker is what you
used to call it. How embarrassing.
Well, how about another point?
There's there was a US citizen, this is
on the May 23, who had a real
ID.
He had the new real ID. He complied
right up to the main point, and he
was handcuffed and held in immigration raid before
finally being released.
So apparently, not even what and what it
says is the man told him that his
authorities took his ID from his wallet, told
him that it was fake before handcuffing him.
Like, these people aren't even up to date
on what the current IDs they're pushing on
you are. They're going, that's a fake ID.
We're looking at I mean, so nothing is
sacred here, guys. They're going after anyone they
want with no justification. It's been that way
from the very beginning. I still don't think
this has anything to do with what they
claim it does.
Here's a clip that'll probably upset you. Here,
this guy this is a a Georgetown scholar,
Bedar Khan Sorey.
You've heard them discuss this. Just what you
probably don't hear from the people lying about
every part of these stories, like Nome claiming
people are illegal aliens when you can prove
they're not.
He had, I think it's what, a j
one visa?
So he was here legally on a visa.
He didn't have citizenship, but he was in
this country legally with a visa because of
his job.
Listen to what they did to this man.
You were detained for nearly two months. Mhmm.
Tell me about that experience.
Two months.
Just wait.
I was teaching my class that day, and
when I reached my home, I saw an
unmarked car driving dangerously. It was about to
hit me. And then when I was about
to reach my door, it just blocked me.
And
this guy with masks,
He was masked, and he jumped out of
the car as if he was some militia
and asked me, am I bother? I said,
yes.
And next thing he said was I was
under arrest.
I was devastated.
I was terrified. And you were Note the
Palestinian flagpenny Scott, and I know you understand
why this is happening. Detained in a facility
in Virginia, then Louisiana,
and then finally
in Texas. And some of those transfers happened
in the middle of the night. And you
know why those transfers happened? Because they were
trying to keep one step ahead of the
Supreme Court or the court rulings that were
telling them to release these people.
And they they would jump from place to
place. They would circumvent the Texas legislate. I
mean, that's or rather the rulings.
Now I I'm not I I'm not gonna
speak to their exact knowledge of you know,
or intentions around his exact move, but that
is why they were doing this in a
lot of these locations. We've already reported on
that. They were moving and shuttling groups around
because they were ordered to release them
in that jurisdiction, so they moved to Louisiana.
That's why Ozturk and the rest were sent
there because they they're places that were amenable
to what they wanted to accomplish.
It's just corrupt, guys. It's corrupt
from the top down.
Allegedly because of overcrowding.
They they just kidnapped me and disappeared me
and was pushing me from one detention center
to other. My my hands, my waist, my
body was chained, shackled,
and,
treating me like an animal,
dehumanizing me in every possible way. I was
feeling humiliated, and, ultimately,
when I reached Texas, it was a very
extremely overcrowded
place.
Mafez, as as Buttar said, he was arrested
outside of your home. What was the
first night like after he was arrested?
So that night was a terrifying night for
me.
I remember myself.
I slept behind the door.
I was afraid that someone will come and
pick up my children
and take them away from me like they
did for
Bedir. So it was terrifying.
I was crying because
the ceasefire ends in Gaza, and the war
started again.
I was trying to reach my family in
Gaza, and I couldn't
for some time. Then
when I talked with my mother, her voice
was breaking,
and then
she was crying. I was crying for many
reason, crying about
my husband and the people who are
who have been killed in Gaza. And And
can you describe what it was like when
Butter was finally released and was able to
return home?
The moment I saw him,
the soul
returned to my body.
And that moment, it wasn't
the moment for me. It is the moment
for hundred of supporter who was with me
that moment.
They were chanting,
on his name, one, two, three, but there
is a free
They share with us this joy. I was
proud to be his wife and the mother
of his children.
Now there are people that will simply try
to make rationalize
why that's okay just because of the way
she looks. And if you don't understand right
now that that is a driving force be
in along with what's happening right now, being
seeded from the Zionist racist mentality,
I don't know how else to explain it.
It's very clear how they're this is,
I mean, you can draw a map and
show how these things have been used over
the Israeli government has used these divisive tactics
in other genocides like Rwanda or Bosnia. And
it's how this works. And right now, I
think we are being focused on. It has
been for a long time. The bottom line
is regardless
of what you think drove this,
you should be outraged this would happen in
this country based on the things that you
think this country is supposed to be like
in every possible way. This was a violation
of everything we hold sacred. And they had
they said it attained they denied him contact
with his attorney.
How again, how because you think that somehow
these things just don't exist because you claim
you're fighting something you're not?
Alien enemies. Exactly. It doesn't matter, guys. These
things are constitutionally
trying, and these people don't care about that.
The America First administration is destroying the one
thing that holds this place together. And it
says it wouldn't even let him speak with
his wife.
He says one should, at this time, show
courage because courage is also contagious. We need
to break the cycle of the chilling
effect. Couldn't agree more.
Now this part or this part is
scary,
but also hilarious at the same time if
it wasn't so serious.
Even Twitter has now fact checked their claim.
Now what I think this story is
is somebody else out there taking advantage of
the belligerent nature of what they're doing.
It could be that or it could just
be that they're all on the same line,
but the point is that you know that
they are acting irrationally. They're not checking things.
They're looking at a Vatar tweet and then
deporting somebody or trying to based on one
tweet from a Zionist group. A a a
court of law called that out on record
and said it appears the only thing that
no one the rest were using was this
one tweet
that turned out to be false.
That's on the record. The guy was released.
So if you can at least I mean,
let let's just even say you think that
everything else was the say was good and
that was the one mistake. You have to
acknowledge they're making mistakes. And then that means
you have to be clear about the fact
that there shouldn't be that allowed. It's redo
processing. It's all the obvious that people that
just don't wanna acknowledge this are trying to
pretend like, it doesn't apply here because they're
X, Y, and Z. Yes, it does.
Because of exactly things like this, or or
the teen that was almost sent or the
Americans almost or the teen that was sent
to El Salvador. The point is that somebody
reached out
and made a case about this guy saying
he was basically trying to get Noem in
this process to deport him. Turns out,
he did or or I'm skipping the part
is that the letter came in that was
supposed to be you know, they alleged was
a threat to Donald Trump's life.
And they this letter was allegedly from him.
So they arrested him and tried to deport
him.
Turns out in the investigation that he didn't
write the letter. Apparently, he can't even write
in English in the first place. And on
top of that, that ultimately, the person who
was trying to,
who, I guess, robbed him and he was
suing them was the person trying to get
him deported because that case was about to
come into court.
I mean,
so if it looks the way it appears
as somebody who was trying to take advantage
of the frivolous deportations to get somebody who
was innocent out of the way before he
could make this person go to jail for
robbing or whatever. We'll read through it. It's
just wild regardless of the the validity of
whether that was the intention, because I can't
speak to that.
They lied about this. And, apparently, all you
need is a fake letter and an allegation,
and then then you could be deported. But
we already know this, seeing as how they've
deported people for being in the wrong place
at the wrong time.
Aaron says, oh my god. CNN just broke
this story in effect. And I I saw
it on,
the New Republic. We'll talk about that next.
The investigators believe the guy below did not
send this letter. In fact, it was apparently
sent by a guy in jail for robbing
the guy they're trying to deport, who wants
to get him deported before he's out of
trial
or put on trial. It's crazy. Now, again,
here is Noam's tweet. Thanks to our ICE
officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate
president Trump is behind bars.
The threat this threat comes not even a
year after president Trump was shot in Butler.
I'm basically saying, oh, continue. You guys should
you know, all politicians and members of the
media should take notice and stop driving this
kind of rhetoric.
Secretary Noem has fallen for a hoax.
Mister Reyes did not write this letter. A
man who is currently awaiting trial for allegedly
assaulting and robbing mister Reyes wrote the letter,
sent it to ICE to get him deported,
and they just blindly followed suit because they're
ridiculous.
And my gut tells me that's the kind
no. We'll just fall for that because that's
how flimsy this is right now. But what's
crazy to me is that this guy was
also not here illegally. We'll go into that.
In fact, what I I believe it was
a
yeah, it was a v he the the
process I I think it was in this
r yeah. It's right here.
A strange term of events followed the arrest
of Ramon,
Morales Reyes, a 54 year old Mexican born
man who was living in Milwaukee as he
sought a U visa, a type of visa
available to victims of crimes. Now, again, same
point. Regardless of whether you think that's legitimate
or not, it is the current law. So
the reality is as he's in the process
of that, he is here legally. It doesn't
matter. I mean, at least be honest enough
to say that I don't agree with that
and then make that why you're arguing. To
argue somehow that that's just not true, you're
lying. It's easy to prove. Or that somehow
that that shouldn't be applied, well, okay, then
that should be the next argument and shouldn't
be yanked out of this guy's hands because
you don't like what's currently happening. It is
the legal reality. You know? It's it's just
so frustrating we're dealing with such dishonest people.
So
here's the New Republic. Investigators say ice Barbie,
Kristi Noem's latest arrest was a setup. Homeland
Security Kristi Noem celebrated the arrest of a
Mexican man she claimed made a threat against
Donald Trump's life. Now, you know, by the
way, another alternative is that they've manufactured it
themselves to keep the whole assassination narrative going.
Who knows?
But it goes on to say, in a
post on Wednesday, Noem lauded the arrest of
the 54 year old that they are wrongly
arresting, alleging that he'd sent a letter to
immigration, to ICE, as well as several other
federal agencies. And, again, one of the main
points the investigators are finding is that he
can't even write in English. It's just ridiculous.
All politicians and members of the media should
take notice, she says. But a high level
law enforcement official briefed on the matter told
CNN that after speaking to Reyes, law enforcement
officials had determined
he wasn't the let author letter, letter's author.
A handwriting sample Reyes provided didn't match that
of the handwritten letter. Further investigators suspect that
Reyes was set up by someone hoping to
see him deport before deported before he,
a separate robbery case. One person suspected of
playing a role in the letters has have
made had made jail calls inquiring
about specific addresses, including one that received the
menacing note. See, that that's it's people will
try to dismiss every way they can.
The the evidence has come out, and that's
developing more since this report. On top of
that, if you're of no a known position
and you're which, by the way, you're already
seeing them double down on their just Democrat
activist and whatever their stupid narratives always are,
you realize that all you'd really have to
do was take this a step further. Lay
out your case.
If you're claiming he did write it, then
show more than an allegation in a piece
of paper. Prove that's the reality. Because what
the investigators are showing is that you could
prove that people that have a clear motive
to make this happen were calling and got
the address the places you sent it to.
And the fact is that you can see
based on multiple factors that he wasn't even
capable, let alone wrote this letter.
But it says in a press release, the
Department of Homeland Security arrested asserted that Reyes
had written the letter. The agency also claimed
that Reyes had, quote, entered The US illegally
at least nine times. Now the the the
report that they put out claims that. I
mean, it does seem to be the reality
that he was in the country illegally, but
the question becomes, like they made the case
about Garcia that they grossly misrepresented,
at what point was he apply was he
coming here to flee violence? Or, you know,
it's also possible that he made that up.
It doesn't change the legal reality of going
through that process, which I get. There's an
abuse there.
But to pretend that's not the case without
even fully knowing that is dishonest from every
possible way.
Bottom line,
he was in the country legally based on
that basic process, which I personally disagree with.
The idea that we should allow this limbo
state forever that does get taken advantage of.
But I'm also honest enough to acknowledge that
it is currently the law, so therefore, we
should engage with it until what's the old
saying then?
Vote it out. Right? Go vote you know,
go to go to politics and make sure
you change that going forward. Well, how often
that that never happens. But the bottom line
is
they were lied to or we were lied
to by them.
And another man's life was taken advantage of
because Christian Ulm either doesn't know how to
do her job or was willing to lie
about it. And it continues to expand. Fox
News. State department now reviewing all visa holders
associated with Harvard, not just students.
I mean, in what world does that even
make sense? You're this is so obviously punitive.
You're going after and I'm not taking any
side. I've pointed out all sorts of crazy
things about Harvard, whether it's the woke left
side of it or the crazy overlap with
Charles Lieber and the different things they've done
with the overlap with Epstein.
Well, see, that's not stuff they wanna get
into because they're all wrapped into that too.
The point here is that it's about trying
to make this about the one conversation
and the standoff between Trump and Harvard, and
the idea that now they're just going, oh,
yeah? You don't wanna just bend? Well, fine.
Then we're gonna go after everybody. Without there
even being a valid, logical reason to just
go after, this is punitive.
And they're going after anybody that's there that
they disagree with who said something on about
Israel. They they don't even hiding that anymore.
And yet you have all these people screaming
America First.
Free speech as the this government is actively
suppressing people's free speech.
Marco Rubio. The US will begin revoking visas
of Chinese students,
including those with connections to the Chinese Communist
Party or studying in critical fields.
K. Let me get this straight.
A random Chinese kid who happens to be
studying in a critical field will have his
visa yanked. Why? I mean, are are is
this McCarthyism again? I mean, guys, these people
are tired. They have the same old regurgitation
of the same things.
This is absurd.
We've already been through this. But if you
get the screaming sycophants online right now that
will pretend like this all makes sense, and
you can read about a few of them
right down there.
Oh, and so if you wanna be outraged
about the hypocrisy, here's Rubio going, we're gonna
get rid of them just because they're Chinese
and be working on the wrong things. And
we only you know, we wanna get these
people out of our country. Right? Well, Mexican
president demands The US explain
deals they just made with a terrorist cartel
figure amid extradition push.
It says,
Shinebaum, the the the president,
said that US authorities must explain why they
have made plea deals with the members of
a drug cartel that they themselves have designated
as foreign terrorists. Well, guess what? If you're
even barely paying attention, that's that's just Monday,
guys. That's what this government has done its
entire existence.
Working with other terrorist governments or working with
the moderate rebels or they work with the
terrorist organizations. That's what they do. So the
the game they're playing about trying to get
all the bad guys out is they clearly
go after the people that are just there.
Well, seemingly not going after the worst people.
It just shows you who they really are.
And in this case, they're making a deal
with the the worst of the worst to
be in this country or they just brought
in some. We just talked about that too.
The family they made a deal with. But
it says, we must emphasize something very important.
The United States government recently in issued a
decree labeling some organized crime groups as terrorist
organizations.
They have repeatedly stated they do not negotiate
with these groups. So they need to explain
why in these cases,
agreements are being made. Yeah. Because they're hypocrites,
guys. Because they don't mean what they say.
It's all about using narratives in the moment
and getting emotionally driven people to react.
Now,
Jose
Olivi
Olivares says the Trump administration is trying to
dismiss charges against a top MS thirteen leader,
Vladimir Antonio Ave of A Arevlo
Chavez
to deport him to El Salvador
according to records unsealed today.
Now it says Chavez was a key negotiator
with Boukule's government.
He knows a lot about Boukule's pact with
MS thirteen. See how much this continues to
come out?
I mean, this is just mud on their
face every day. People that are still trying
to pretend like what this administration is doing,
again, don't hear this is one-sided. It's both
sides. It's just your government. But some of
them seem to think somehow this one's different
than all the ones before it. But the
ones that still seem to act like this
is somehow the good direction. Guys, everywhere you
look, they're working with the despots. They're working
with the worst people in the world.
And at this case, the whole thing about
El Salvador and the libertarian future, this guy
literally made a deal with the terrorist group
that you claim you're fighting
in order to make it look like crime
had gone down. The US government called that
out before. Here's the report from DropSight News.
Secret Bugleh deal lies behind Trump El Salvador
deportations.
It's not just conjecture. Read it. It's provable.
So this goes on to highlight that not
only are they not going after criminals, but
they're sending them back to a place where
they can live without persecution.
Or, prosecution, excuse me. Shouldn't be surprising, though.
Christian Zionism and Bukele's El Salvador, hard to
miss why.
Of course, the new Trump administration
and the technocratic
Zionist coup of the United States is the
way I see all of this.
And let's overlap that with
the
Israeli genocide that's in con continuing to happen.
Now one thing I do think is interesting
on the partisan overlap too is we this
just keeps happening. Whether it's Kristi Noem, whether
it's Alex Jones or the Chi Colonels, whether
it's Laura Loomer and the the China overtaking
this country, which we shouldn't dismiss. Of course,
it's possible that China, like any other government,
could be influencing, if not occupying this country.
Right? Obviously.
Except when these people
or except when you've never seen a more
obvious example in your life where Israel's doing
exactly that. But so right now, when pal
or even just maybe you could just make
a case that technocrats are taking over. Right?
That's my point. Palantir.
But nope.
June 1.
Christine Ohm comes out and says, China has
infiltrated our country.
Okay.
And here's what some oh, right. This was
the the comment. Somebody says, China's infiltrated the
country. Yes. Because if you speak out against
China, you will be you will be silenced.
Or wait. Is that what's is that what's
happening? I mean, it's like the say the
old I think it's attributed to Voltaire. Right?
To know who rules over you. No look
to you are not allowed to criticize.
I it it's incredible to think that you
could argue that, that they were so clearly
being influenced to an alarming degree
by the Israeli government.
And I and I just simply said, you
know, hey, look over there. That's what they're
all doing. Loomer and the rest, like, every
other day. Or or even the interesting point
to look back at how long Jones has
been like, the Chicom, Chicom, China, which is
not something to dismiss. But how funny is
now it just literally bumps up against the
obvious and I we're they seem to keep
ignoring it. That needs to show you something.
And here's
Jones predict and, oh, this is just funny
to point out again. And I'll point I'll
point out again as we go forward. This
is May 9. '1 point '2 million views.
Alex Jones' prediction that the president would completely
cut ties with Benjamin
Netanyahu. Yeah. That's aging like sour milk, isn't
it? Well, I mean, certainly could happen tomorrow.
And I I if I said at the
time when I first talked about this, I
I can see a world in which he
could be a scapegoat.
That's not the same thing as saying that
they've cut ties because the bottom line is
right now, that's not what happened. He said
this because of a a floated report about
them distancing and not relying on US aid,
and that rapidly fell away within, like, twenty
four hours, and now we're right back to
the it's the same
thing. Or
like
he said, the Ukraine war ended about two
months ago. Right? I guess I guess that
or whatever it was. He did. He said,
it's over. We did it. And now here
it is, still continuing.
He said, in this report, Jones exclusively reveals
the backstory of what turned Trump against Netanyahu.
Clearly,
on May 9, they needed you to think
that. That's how I see it. Bottom line
is that does not appear to be what's
happening at all. They're still there and still
blindly supporting Israel's agenda because that's what's going
on. Now interestingly enough, looking back to 10/17/2023,
when I said this, I did not say
this because I was guessing. It was very
apparent to me, and this was the Baptist
Hospital conversation.
I simply said Israel already lost the information
war. October 17,
'10 days after this
whole thing started post October 7. And it
was very apparent to me that they had
already completely fallen apart.
I just think we're now just only really
coming to terms how obvious that is. I
think it was obvious right back then. Just
worth pointing out.
And, of course, stuff like this, where this
Jacob Ben David linker says, it's weird how
everybody forgot about this. And then points to
a story that was embarrassingly broke down within
moments. And I mean, like, for everybody, even
corporate media. Remember this one? Where they showed,
like, the electronics down here and the weird
floor ceilings that just didn't match any of
the buildings they claim it came from or
the fact that you could literally prove that
wasn't even where they said it was. I
mean, this is and the point was directly
beneath UNRWA.
IDF uncovers secret Hamas data center. Oh, you
mean the one that never actually materialized? Or
the number of she Alsheefa hospital,
headquarters. I mean, it's just sad.
One thing to the next or it's a
it's a, you know what was the list?
There's a list. It's calendar. Or a book
that turns out to be something they lied
about or they're claiming it's instructions for chemical
weapons. Nope. That's a thing from Amazon. Like,
lazy.
At the beginning, I'm like, do they want
you to see this stuff? I just think
they're bad at this. But this guy's showing
you that right now.
Like, this right here.
Keith, they've literally claimed that was a list
of, like, terrorist activities
until people who could actually read Hebrew or,
Arabic were like, that's just that's the days
of the week. That's what it is. You
can check-in with anybody. And yet, they had
the nerve to go, you're the terrorist stuff.
You they that's how dumb they think you
are or maybe just how dumb they are.
Israelis in this context is what I'm talking
about. But
they'll do whatever they can to go look
over there. Talk about China. Look at these
people. Stop paying attention to the obvious. Now
Mohammed Shehada
and Jeremy Scahill made really excellent points about
this that I needs to be
this is getting
missed. It's falling by the wayside because of
an obvious lot of stuff going on.
But Jeremy Scahill says this, interesting. In Hamas'
new proposal, and you can read about it
right here,
it reasserted
language that Israel and Witkoff removed that says
that Hamas would relinquish all governance
and management of Gaza to an independent technical
committee, Well, technocratic is what it said in
the other point the other documents
of Palestinians.
Israel Litkoff paper didn't mention this at all.
Interesting. And as Mohammed Shehada says, Netanyahu
basically wants
Hamas to stay in power in Gaza to
use as pretext for genocide. That was his
opinion, but I agree.
While Hamas has been keen to step down
from government to end Israel's pretext for besieging
and annihilating Gaza, this has been the an
ongoing dynamic for over a decade. In 2014,
Hamas stepped down from the government to hand
Gaza over to the PA. Then Netanyahu rushed
to declare war on Gaza to kill that
agreement and keep Hamas in power. I mean,
it just it just never stops. And anybody
with a brain, if you're being honest, this
has been plain as daylight for the very
beginning.
For whatever reason, it's finally breaking through for
people. But just in case you forgot, I'll
play that clip of former
members of the government telling you that that's
what they they the the point was to
fund Hamas in order to keep them divided.
I think I still got it loaded up
in here.
Yeah. So you're saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record whoever wants
to avoid
the threat
of a two state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
with the permission of our prime minister is
to
let
Qatar
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1,400,000,000.
By doing it, we increase the power of
Hamas.
We
did everything in order to make sure that
Hamas will go on controlling Gaza,
and Palestinian authority
will control the West Bank so they will
fight each other.
Very clear. And you guys here, I'm sure,
have seen that a thousand times. Not more
than just me playing it. Or the Herets
tweet saying that that was the reality. And
Netanyahu on record saying that is our strategy.
It just it's just so lazy and frustrating
how clear it all is.
But the point, Netanyahu basically wants them to
stay in power.
So same thing. Jeremy McHale pointed this out.
Promise lies says genuinely losing my mind how
this is not bigger news. I mean, we
all know why it's not. They're all invested
in this. Hamas
is literally proposing to give up power in
Gaza in a ceasefire proposal, and Israel and
US keep specifically rejecting that part.
I mean, it's being covered by corporate media.
It's not hard to find right now. This
is is this is how much the Zionist
want an excuse to continue continue genocide.
Must and here's what's funny about this. So
as that's happening, here's what Mossad commentary
writes on this today.
Hamas is now at its lowest point ever
in terms of control in Gaza. If Israel
is persistent on the operation of Gideon's chariots
chariots and its mission, it may be less
than a month that Hamas will be the
thing of the past
as they're actively making sure that stays in
that they continue to maintain power.
You just can't make this up. I mean,
that's how clumsy this
is. So
we'll we'll finish with what's going on
in the aid massacre as they're pretending they're
trying to end this war.
So, again, let's not let's highlight the fact
that in that deal, they discussed the idea
of a technocratic committee, which is just crazy,
and as well as the fact that Israel,
this is on May 13, seeks funding for
plan, which I'm sure Palantir happily stepped up
for, to require facial recognition in exchange for
food in Gaza, which, by the way, is
what they went on to do, as we'll
highlight right here.
Max Blumenthal broke this down. Mossad has been
named I mean, Mossad, if you can believe
that, named by the Israeli lawmakers as the
funder of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
The GHF is the group that's running the
whole aid operation, and it's Mossad
and American mercenaries.
Gee, I I mean, it's hard to hard
to piece together why it ended up being
a massacre.
The weaponized aid organization is the linchpin of
Israel's plan to ethnically cleanse Northern Gaza by
forcing the starting population into a concentration camp
like hubs, which they use the word concentrated.
Max adds biometric concentration camps marketed
as aid hubs,
all run by US Mercenaries and paid by
Israeli intelligence via a Swiss shell company founded
by the biggest names in humanitarian aid, including
the former CEO of World Central Kitchen, which
at the time, despite them killing people in
that mission too, it was called out that
there was a weird overlap with that entity.
But welcome to the privatized Gaza genocide.
Unreal.
Now here's what Mohammed Shehadeh had to say
on the this was the May
28,
calling this out that this was coming. Here's
what he had to say. Single person I
spoke to in Gaza said one has to
be completely insane out of their minds
to step a foot in those heavily militarized
concentration camps that Israel is setting up in
Rafah,
where you have to pass through numerous checkpoints
with Israeli genocidal soldiers teaming around it waiting
to ambush
whoever they want. And you have to pass
through facial recognition technology,
fingerprinting,
different layers of screening and vetting with an
undisclosed
criteria.
And at the end of it, it's to,
you have to literally walk from Beit Hanoun
40 1 kilometers to Rafah to pick up
a package that would weigh 20 to 40
kilos and then 41 kilometers back under constant
bombardment thinking that you will make it back
alive. Nobody in Gaza thinks that if you
step a foot in those compounds, you will
make it back home alive on your feet.
Either you will be killed on the way,
you will be kidnapped by the Israeli soldiers,
you will be blackmailed into collaborating with Israel,
or,
the food that you would get would be
looted on the way. But then there's the
other element of it that people are afraid
about, the forcible expulsion, that all those hubs
are established. Three of them are established in
Rafah. One of them is to be established
to the south of the Nasserim Corridor,
where Israel would tell people the only way
you can get food, leave your home, leave
Northern Gaza, and move to the borders with
Egypt for the final phase of the genocide
to be implemented where Israel would push them
a few hundred meters further into Egypt, into
the Sinai Desert. Then there is the other
element of
basically
using this as an ultimate tool of dictating
who lives and who dies because it's only
60% of Gaza that would receive this aid
according to the organization itself, according to Israel
itself, only 60%,
which means Israel would pick and choose who
gets aid and who dies. It is like
dystopian by every metric you choose. You're wielding
it as a weapon to further the genocide,
to debilitate the entire population, collectively punish them
while pretending to allow any food in, but
you're practically not.
I mean, guys, this is no different than
the last many times, but, look, I mean,
we just made the reference point of the
pier.
I mean, do we already forget how that
went? They roll out a pier
that cost all this money, and they they
delivered some meal, like, a couple of crates
that bed basically nobody. And then all it
turned out it was for a military operation
where they executed people who were in beds
and hospitals,
all dressed up like Palestinians, and then the
pier went away.
That's that's, I mean, it's just so transparent
that that was only about manipulation. And it's
the same thing here. Or the flower massacre,
which I'll point to in a second, which
was yet another example of them manufacturing starvation
and then taking advantage of desperation.
This is and this is just punishment. They're
making these people suffer. And as Mohammed writes,
my latest Israel's Hamas looting aid claim has
been debunked by the Israeli military.
US officials, the UN, World Food Programme, every
major NGO. Yet the myth lives on for
one reason, to cover up a genocide of
star a a genocide of starvation.
Then he does he's done amazing work on
this. Here's one of these threads, and it's
just it's unreal how obvious all of this
is. As he writes, the con a conclusive
evidence of Israel running the very criminal gangs,
looting aid in Gaza. Now, by the way,
this is not even a new conversation. There's
reports about this. Roberts talked about this. How
they or I made this point about the
tunnels that went under from that Time Magazine
article, that they
knew and used the reality of this to
keep the argument that they need this to
keep the occupation or keep the military side
of it. And they would use those tunnels
themselves, so they would allow them to it's
very obvious. And turns out that most of
what they brought through those tunnels were toys
and food and different things. And, yes, sometimes
weapons for the resistance. The bottom line, though,
is Israel knew about that and used that.
So here, you could see when you go
through this yourself, we went over this re
the other day. I I pointed to it.
From Hamas footage, senior Abu Shabaab gang leader
is identified.
Ghassan al Dhanani is the mercenary running the
gang's operation on the ground. He survived this
ambush and is believed to be still running
the Israel backed gang.
In mid April, exactly when the ambush was
carried out, a Facebook group posted the names
of four armed individuals that were killed in
Rafa while conducting work. They were ex officers
of the PA security forces. Now if you
don't remember,
this is really important.
Oh, I thought that would pop up. Let's
see.
I wanna get Robert's article on
there you go.
The if he's done, I think, at least
three different articles for TLAB about this topic,
but this one's entitled Palestinian Authority Does Israel's
Dirty Work, One Killed in Clashes. His our
overarching point is the Palestinian Authority has always
been a construct. It is not Palestinian. It
is an Israeli manipulation to kind of off
sort outsource the enforcement. So it doesn't look
like they're doing it. It's a lot of
different points. Very important to understand.
So he says they're they're they are the
ones seen killed in Hamas video above. Now
it says the IDF itself just admitted that
Abu Shabab Shabab is the gang leader responsible
for looting aid. They left out that he's
doing so under full IDF protection who allow
him to operate this group of armed mercenaries
in Rafa. The whole document is rarely content.
You can read it for yourself. I mean,
the the evidence is shocking. And, again, this
goes back a long way.
These people are being identified. This one we
already talked about. This guy that's out there
directing traffic, and that they have overlaps with
ISIS in different groups. I mean, these are
radical radicalized people that Israel has been using
funding just like the US government.
Now here's CNN's article. At least 26 people
killed after Israeli forces opened fire near Gaza,
a distribution center, health workers say. At least
26 people, now the number has gone up.
I've seen 35. I've seen more.
Have been killed in scores injured after Israeli
forces opened fire on Sunday near a Southern
Gaza aid distribution center run by a controversial
US backed foundation
according to Palestine Red Crescent Society. Now that's
the Mossad funded
US backed
terrorist organization as that way it looks to
me right now. Crowds of citizens headed to
receive food aid from a site in the
Rafa area when Israeli forces opened fire. According
to the paramedics on the ground, the only
medical professionals that were present in the area,
this Red Crescent,
more people more than 80 people were injured,
logically shot. According to the Nasir Medical Complex
in Khan Yunus,
also in Southern Gaza,
excuse me,
which confirmed the death of 26 people. CNN
has reached out to the Israeli military for
comment as well as the to the Gaza
Humanitarian Foundation, so Mossad, which runs the site.
The the g h GHF is a private
organization backed by Israel and The United States.
It was sent up amid Israeli accusations that
Hamas is stealing aid in Gaza and selling
it for profit. Humanitarian
organizations say there's no evidence of that. There's
not. And Israel hasn't presented any evidence publicly.
That's just insane that we're still there. United
Nations aid agencies have criticized the GHF at
their aid mechanism,
saying it violates humanitarian principles and raises risks
for Palestinians, and here we are. Like I
said this before we got to the massacre.
GHF is not screening Palestinians at aid distribution
sites, it says, whether you may want that
or not. The point is despite Israeli officials
saying that additional security measures were a core
reason why they needed the new group and
the new program, and then and then didn't
check anything. Like, it's just so transparent what
they're trying to manufacture here. Criticism has been
mounting against both Israel and the GHF after
chaos broke out last week. We talked about
that. While tens of thousands of starving Palestinians
arrived at two new food distribution sites. And
guess what? Shots were fired then and they
all ran away. It's not new what's happening.
The game here is my opinion is to
manufacture the illusion that they're
animals. We're trying to help them, and they
just wanna kill everybody. And that's it's just
I don't think anyone's buying that other than
people that already believe that because they're either
blinded by their own hatred or don't care
about the truth.
Aid was distributed without incident according to the
statement. Can you even believe that? So despite
the universal coverage, they still put on a
statement. They go, oh, it went it went
great. Everything was fine.
However, a mixed picture appears on the ground
with claims that a distributed believed to be
inaccurate. So the argue is that a didn't
even really get distributed,
but they sure as hell killed a lot
of people.
GHF also claims reports of deaths, mass injuries,
and chaos at the site are false.
Just it's just insane.
They're fabricated untrue. That's what Israel's own government
put out. Well, here's some of that fake
untrue information.
Oops. Let me pull it down.
So it just shows people when it says,
eyewitnesses report that Rafa massacre occurred after Israeli
drone loudspeakers
instructed displaced Palestinians to head to the area
to receive aid.
Once they gathered, Israeli forces opened fire and
shelled them, killing and injuring hundreds.
Drop site news, fifteen killed at the time
they reported this, fifty injured, more went up.
Israeli forces opened fire. Same thing we just
reported.
There's one other part this was gonna read.
Three sites have been set up in Gaza
and Rafa and Southern Gaza.
According to the IDF's own estimates, 1,000,000 Palestinians
still reside there, which means they killed over
a million people. In a statement published by
Facebook just an hours just hours ago before
they posted this, the GHF said that on
Saturday, June 1, it will have only one
active distribution site, which is the Tell Al
Sultan site. All of those will be closed.
So they're they're driving people and they're hurting
them. The statement continues, we invite only the
residents of this area.
Bottom line, it says the new site was
established, the new the same neighborhood.
I thought there was a point that I
was gonna pluck out of there.
Anyway, the bottom line is more information, more
videos of these people being shot, and more
ongoing follow-up on all this.
Israel Exposed highlights this. Fresh news, same thing.
Israel's trying to deceive the world and deny
the Rafa Eid massacre happened. And in these
videos, I'll play I'll play one of these
in a second. You see, you can hear
the the main thing to point out is
that you can hear the Israeli automatic gunfire.
There's nobody arguing that anybody else in the
situation even has that capability. And so, arguably,
the reality is that they're openly firing at
a bunch of civilians. And there and there's
aid workers that were there that saw it
all, and they're still trying to lie about
it. Says the exact moment US Mercenaries opened
fire at groups of starving civilians. 30 people
died. It looks like it's going up from
there. Jeremy Scahill says, some in Gaza are
calling this the Witkoff massacre because of his
sabotage of the fair the fair ceasefire deal
and because the aid scam in The US
and Israel have imposed a
that they have imposed is proving correct that
those who warned it was a lethal trap.
Again, Muhammad Shariat was only one of them.
They said you're gonna get shot at and
killed, and they show up and they get
shot at and killed. That's what seems to
continue to happen.
Eremate says the Israeli playbook impose a starvation
siege, establish a fake aid group, commit massacres
after massacre.
CNN report, an assault rod simply says, how
depraved do you have to be to starve
an entire population,
lure lure lure and humiliate them with crumbs,
and then shoot and kill them?
Well, not the first time. You wanna break
this down? This one's from March 2. The
flower massacre setup, false flag attempt exposed.
I mean, this was nailed to the ground.
Their story changed four or five times, and
every time it changed, it was trying to
adapt to what the new information showed. That's
what I mean by the reactive propaganda.
They're just trying to they're desperate. They're trying
to go, oh, no. Well, here's why. It's
like with Shereen Abu Clay.
Started out where they killed her, and then
it turns out they didn't. Oh, well, it
was a it was a a random, you
know, other I forgot what the other middle
part was. Somebody else. Oh, no. It was
it was a ricochet bull from the idea.
There wasn't on purpose. Oh, no. They did
shoot her, but they thought she was somebody
else. I I'm not even making it up.
Over the process of weeks, they just changed
their story, and I'll I'll have that included
here, I think. Oh, I guess not. I'll
include it since I've mentioned it.
And as Robert covered both times, the US
government actively helped cover this up. I'll include
that for you.
Now
another article we discussed, and this was mark
May the next day, March 5, Gaza's flower
massacre was only the beginning of famine that
has just started.
Ryan Grim highlights what Israel said. Now this
is today.
Imagine doing this with all the evidence you
can see out there. I mean, this again,
desperate is the word for this. They've no
other option than just to go lies.
It says,
false reports have been spread in recent hours,
including serious allegations against the IDF regarding fire
towards Gaza residents, like they've never done that
before. In the area of the Humanitarian Aid
Distribution Center, they've done that before too. Findings
from an initial inquiry indicate right. So we
investigated ourselves,
and we indicate that the IDF did not
fire its civilians while they were near or
within the humanitarian aid distribution site and that
reports to this effect are false. So what
are they saying? They were just outside the
area? That's what I'm sure it'll get to
if they had to push. The IDF is
cooperating with the GHF and international aid organizations
to order in order to enable the distribution
of AU to Gaza residents and not to
Hamas. You know, the thing that they can't
prove ever happened and then everyone's calling them
a liar for. IDF calls on the media
to be cautious with information
published by Hamas terrorist organization. That's not what
happened. See, See, that's the way they try
to conflate it for those that wanna blindly
accept their narrative. These were there's video on
the ground from individuals. There's video. There's hell
eight aid workers, Red Crescent.
I just need I just can't keep pretending
these things aren't happening. As it says right
here, Red Cross. Mass shooting victims where it
is real's back aid site. That's Red Cross.
Different than Red Crescent.
Doesn't matter. They don't care. They're gonna lie
because that's all they can do. Ryan Grim
says this statement from the IDF
about last night's massacre was also distributed to
journalists.
But in the version sent to reporters,
it includes an off the record section that
acknowledges the IDF did fire, quote,
to prevent several suspects from approaching the troops.
Interesting they chose to leave that part out,
which matches witness descriptions.
The statements the statement was not sent to
me directly by the IDF,
and I never agreed to any OTR conditions
with them. So I'm sharing the off record
portion here. Any journalist on the IDF press
list can confirm this was included in the
IDF statement. Here is that they left out
of the posted site. Overnight, approximately one kilometer
away from the aid distribution, which is why
they said outside the area. And outside the
operating hours,
IDF troops acted to prevent several suspects from
approaching the troops during the active now here's
disgusting about this. I'm gonna show you the
video right now, and you could look them
up. They're everywhere.
You're gonna tell me that this is there
are
hundreds, if not more, people all around this
area, and this was in the process. And
they're gonna try to pretend that there's off
hour. It's just lazy.
Everyone can see what this is. During the
activity, warning shots were fired towards several suspects
who advanced toward the troops. There is no
connection between this incident and the false claims.
You mean, like, aside from the fact that
last week, you did the same thing Or
the flower massacre? Or a hundred other examples
where you shot at them openly and then
bragged about it online? Nah. That's not even
what we're dining close.
Mohammed says, don't believe your lying eyes. Believe
the terrorist psycho who brags, I've killed a
lot of Arabs in my life, and there's
no problem with that. That's Natali Bennett.
He says, the report is simply untrue. Israeli
tanks did not open fire on civilians at
the shelling or near the aid center.
26 dead after tanks opened fire near Gaza.
That's BBC.
CNN, same thing. Now, I'm not saying because
they reported it makes it true, but even
the mainstream media is acknowledging what everyone else
can prove because that has shifted. We can
tell.
Now, here's the clip. One of the many
where you can you can hear oh, actually,
did I forget to grab that?
Oh,
there it is.
And realize how continuous the firing. That's that's
not warning off some people. That's just continue
and that's what we're told. They were firing
open now, but thirty plus people were killed.
So when he reports,
don't believe your lying eyes. The this piercing
noise of Israeli machine guns emptied in a
hungry crowd is only happening in your head.
Trust the Israeli government that lied about the
ambulance men. Sheifa hospital, flower massacre, beheaded babies,
looting gangs, Hamad hospital,
Indrajab,
the terror calendar at Red Saudi Hospital, World
Central Kitchen workers, babies in ovens, white phosphorus,
deliberately starving Gazans. Sinwar surrounded himself with 20
hostage in a tunnel. All these are lies,
by the way, provable lies. Gassing hostages,
Ali Hospital, killing women and children with white
flags, mass raping Palestinians,
nonexistent tunnels under graveyards, Nasir Hospital, Hassum Abu
Safia, mass graves, snipers targeting kids in the
head, providing protection to criminal gangs to loot
aid, wiping out Gaza, who refused to collapse
the ceasefire, blowing up Gaza and fleeing south,
Kamal Adhan Hospital claiming dead Gaza children are
dolls, creating safe zones. The general's plan, how
many Hamas militants were killed? Red Crescent taking
part in October 7, calling killing kill kill
journalists Hamas militants. Mohammed Abu
Salmaia, the Indonesian hospital, UNRWA, the Adwa hospital
or the Oudah hospital, killing women, sheltering at
a church, bombing a church,
destroying every single Goshen university, the Turkish cancer
hospital, Hamas hiding giant stockpiles of fuel in
Rafa, finding active smuggling tunnels in Rafa, Hostages
returning pregnant, who killed Yossi, Sharabi. That that
was the the Bebas overlap.
Itya,
SherSky or, the names I'm mispronouncing. The bottom
line
is every single one of these things are
lies.
The the obvious ones you already know, beheaded
babies, babies in an oven, rape.
They're all gonna come back pregnant. I mean,
every single one of these. But yeah. But
they're telling you the truth this time.
Ram Rami Abdul from the human rights the
EuroMed human rights group, the Israeli spokesperson published
a video
suggesting Israel wasn't responsible for the massacre of
starving shill civilians near the American food distribution
point in Rafa in Southern Gaza. But the
video backfired and turned into a scandal.
The footage actually showed a theft operation in
Khan Yunus, not Rafa, by gangs backed by
Israel. Civilians tried to retrieve some of the
stolen aid while the gang, operating under Israeli
drone surveillance,
fired into the air without injuring anyone. For
the record, Israeli targets
any attempt to secure aid.
Now there's so many points to make with
this. Isn't this hilarious? So over here, you
know, this is on June 1.
The point is that the the narrative is
evolving. Right? So they come out and they
go, no. It was outside the area, and
it was out off hours,
Except they put this out first, which shows
remember, this is wrong. They lied about this.
The reason we'll start with this. The reason
I think they put this out is because
it appears as if there are shots being
fired by people that they wanna claim as
a mosque. Only problem is it's not where
they say this this is Khan Yunus, not
Rafa. So that's the first point. So they're
just but they used it because they thought
it would work. That's the kind of dumb
things they try to do. What's funny though,
didn't they just tell you it was off
hours, and then you can see the video
where it shows you that it's dusk?
So they don't care that you're they think
you're too dumb to go, but what? You
just said it was after
hours. But here's the video they claim is
what it was, and it's during the day.
Then it gets caught for being in the
wrong area, and they go, okay. We'll just
move aside.
Like, they literally will just lie after lie
after lie, which again is actually what you've
heard a hundred times over,
which we should just play again and said
this funny because the reality is
do I even have it in there?
It just never stops how clearly these people
will just lie about anything nonstop no matter
what.
But it's right in front of you. You
can't have both things true at the same
time. But they don't care because this might
trick some people over here, and that one
might trick some people over there. Because the
only people they're tricking are either too dumb
to know they're being lied to or willing
to go along with whatever Zionists say. I
think they know that by now. Ryan Grim
says even more footage of the massacre that
the IDF claims didn't happen.
It's horrifying, guys. Children crawling away. They're shooting
openly at people trying to get aid right
in the middle of the day. So here's
the reality. This is not after hours. Seeing
as how this is well before the other
clip with fires gunfire over their heads or
at them when it's dark.
This is how this always goes. And I
well, I shouldn't guarantee you, but most likely
tomorrow, they'll have a new adaptation to the
narrative. They claimed didn't change, but make sense
of the parts that now make them look
like they're wrong.
And your Witcoffs and Millers and arrests will
happily tow the line.
Now Gaza is starving,
has been for a very long time. The
IPC and the rest have been saying this
forever. A million plus people in famine condition.
Now one of the reasons people argue that
this kinda shifted is because there's been images
of all these starving children that have circulated
the globe. And this is what they're showing
you right here. At least some of the
pictures, and I have a whole bunch of
them that's not mean, I don't need to
shock you with a bunch of images of
dead children, a scary, you know, starving people
to hopefully imprint on you that it's happening.
But we've done that over the over this
entire process. It's not today.
But entire article about how the world is
acknowledging the starvation.
Here's what Laura Luma put out.
On April 21,
I genuinely have zero compassion or sympathy for
Gaza.
Not Hamas,
all of Gaza.
I feel nothing for them. Many people are
just like
me. Maybe that's what makes her sleep at
night if that's even possible, but they are
afraid to say it. Yeah. If they're if
they are, then they're disgusting just like you.
And she says, be proud. I'm very proud.
Be proud of who you are and take
pride in not having sympathy
for bloodthirsty Hamas terrorists and their supporters who
cry out in pain as they strike you.
I can't even believe that. We're we are
on the right side of history, she says.
I mean, it's just that seems like a
desperate, shrill claim in hopes that people will
pretend that's the case. I mean, I I
she must know by now that that's not
the prevailing narrative right now. And she goes,
people who support Gaza will not be remembered
kindly in history.
Wow.
Now the I this this is what's so
funny. And they know this to me, this
is what shows you that she is being
directed by something.
The I the the idea that they cry
out in pain as they strike you is
a classically alleged narrative against Jewish people,
which to me is really just a Zionist
overlap, but you could take it for whatever
you want. That that's that's an argument of,
a claim of what Jews do to other
people. Now that's not my mindset. But that
my point is it's one of these claims
or tropes that's been used in the past
that she's now recycling back against the other
side. That's not by accident.
Or the concentration camp use or all the
different things they're slowly leaning into. It it
aside from the obvious that this has gotta
be one of the most soulless, lacking of
compassion,
foul, vile people I've ever seen in my
life. How in the world do you think
that makes sense?
It's disgusting that anybody can look at that
and go, yeah. Like,
at the very least,
this is why it's a perfect example of
defending the free speech right of even the
most vile,
hateful, and ignorant people on the Internet.
If you don't fight for the worst of
speech,
you do not believe in free speech.
And we have the right to call out
such disgustingly foul people.
The point is,
if that wasn't allowed to be stated out
publicly,
they would be saying it in some dark
corner to people that all think that's what
they should be. The reality is this needs
to be public so we can acknowledge what
a disgusting person she is and what she's
driving, what she you know, like, there's all
these disgusting, like, the Tates of the world
that are convincing generations to think that this
is acceptable behavior. Now I don't mean in
a sense that you can act and do
whatever you want. But in a sense that
this is just this is moral. Right? This
is sound. It's integrity. It's the what people
should be doing, the right side of history.
Keep telling yourself that. As I think it
was, Nocturne or what's that guy's I forget
his account. He just simply said this will
age like sour milk. That's why I used
that earlier.
There it is.
Give him a give him a shout out
for that since I said that earlier because
it was in my mind. Here's what he
he posted this. This will age like sour
milk.
And I I think he's right. I mean,
I think I I love the mind that
most people
think that's disgusting.
Even if they agree with, like, the side
she's on, we're like, yeah. But you're like,
what you did there is gross. Like, you
are you're talking about starving children. You're talking
about an entire civilization that even you tried
to pretend weren't all guilty when this first
started. Now suddenly, they're all a bunch of
monsters? Well, that's the whole thing we've been
telling you. That that's these people, Zionists like
her, are the worst people on the planet.
They are actively committing a genocide and telling
you what they're doing is for your best
interest. It's the worst of the worst.
And on top of that, Lula says, hey,
Ryan. Your comment does not show up under
the post because I did post something.
I simply just posted this image of a
dying child that she seems to not care
about
That was simply this is this is doctor
Rosie, British
plastic surgeon volunteering in Gaza, sharing a heartbreaking
testimony in the pediatric ward of an innocent
child that was bombed by Israel.
And has burns and pain, it's it's literally
barely surviving.
But according to Laura Loomer, that we don't
care about that disgusting Hamas supporter. Right, Laura?
My point was I posted that just to
give some kind of example, and guess what?
Twitter's making sure you can't see it because
that's how that works.
And here is what Laura is okay with.
This is what she thinks. She wants you
to pretend is acceptable, that this is only
evil Hamas supporters as opposed to a random
13 year old child who's being tortured in
Israeli prisons.
Look at that.
Burn marks, bruises. I mean, guys, that's insane.
That and this is this is what Israel
did to him well in detention for nothing.
He wasn't charged with the crime. These are
people being arrested.
It says seven months,
and they let him go.
So was he was he terrorist or or
or clearly not. So they just tortured a
Palestinian child because that's what they do. I
mean, do we even need to debate that
anymore? They arguing about why they should be
raping these people on live TV and people
like Laura cheered on?
My god.
That's the reality.
And Patrick Henning says, this is what the
Israelis do to child hostages they abduct.
And then apparently, let go after seven months
with no charge because
they're not criminal. That's what they do to
to not criminals. Or really they do to
anybody Palestinian regardless of their crimes. That's that's
the reality of it.
Harratz happily shown me the truth. As anyone
has been been their nose, said Tianan is
a sadistic torture camp.
So accusing that which you are guilty all
the time. Solomon Ahmed points out that Israeli
or Israeli,
individuals,
and this one is, oh, you know what?
I damn it. I forgot to grab that
one. This is the one that is that
you can read from Arson Ostrovsky, the fake
human rights lawyer as I always call him.
But this point is from another I I
wanna look up who it was. But so
he's saying Israeli calls for the death of
Greta Thunberg and Liam Cunningham.
It says, we have one time opportunity to
drown Greta, and I hope we don't intend
to miss.
So here, just to make sure you don't
miss that is what's happening. Now regardless of
your thoughts on Greta Thunberg, if you're that
simple, that you're still jumping shadow of the
woke dynamic, which we should care about, but
realize that that has nothing to do with
whether they're trying to kill her for reasons
that have nothing to do with woke politics.
I'm just my point is I'm so tired
of having to defend back against people who
go, oh, Greta's a who cares about that
in this context? The bottom line is she
seems to be played by the establishment because
clearly, she was on their side. She's danced
all over the place. But it does seem
at least she appears to be kind of
jumping at what she thinks is important, whatever.
It's sort of like as they grow up,
they get, you know, used as children.
I'm I'm I'll question her like anybody else
entirely because of that. But the point is,
she's on one of these
freedom flotillas.
Just like the many we've shown you with,
like, Joe Meters, for example, from The US's
Liberty who got arrested as an American citizen
and imprisoned for months when the US government
didn't care, or the fact that they just
attacked innocent people in international waters and almost
killed some of them just because they're trying
to bring aid to Gaza. That's a crime.
Nobody cared.
Now we have another example.
Madeline sails to Gaza today with her 12
humanitarian aid and as much life saving aid
as she can carry, including baby formula medical
supplies. She departs from Europe, territorial waters, sailing
entirely through international waters into Palestinian waters off
Gaza.
I believe that's a she's what? A she's
on a TV show. Right?
Unarmed and nonviolent,
Madeline poses no threat. She sails in full
accordance with international law. Any attack or interference
will be dealt deliberate unlawful assault on civilians,
which they do every time. It's very I
mean, they're they know they're putting their lives
at risk when they do this. The point
is,
Mel says, oh, look. An Israeli, in fact,
tied to the government, calling for the murder
of an unarmed woman because she's trying to
feed starving children. Here's what Arsin Ostrovsky said.
This is how brazen and and vicious, maniacal
these people are. He says, oh, look. The
little jihadi
group Greta Thunberg. Why? Because she supports Palestine?
Is trying to get into Gaza to show
solidarity with Hamas. No. No. With Palestine. But
see, they can't even write a sentence without
being dishonest. And she says, it would be
so sad
if something were to happen to her flotilla,
dot dot dot.
I mean, even if you agree with the
sentiment, even if you hate her to the
point where you think she she be killed,
can we not acknowledge how insane that is
for this guy to float this idea? Like,
it's like, we're all gonna laugh along with
him? Like, yeah. Kill her.
I mean, my god. It's like the pager
discussion. Here. Take a pager. They know what
they're doing. These people are deranged.
Why you think it's acceptable to float the
idea of trying to kill somebody like that
because she's doing something you don't like?
I just can't even understand where we are
if this is what the prevailing sentiment is
today. I don't believe that.
So we'll see what happens. I'm willing to
bet you like every other flotilla that they
will attack that.
Now lastly,
few points is we're gonna get into more
in a co upcoming show.
You might have seen this. Israel is now
approved. This is on the twenty ninth. The
biggest West Bank settlement expansion over in over
thirty years. That's a crime no matter where
you look. The only deviation was Pompeo acting
like it wasn't inconsistent with the law, never
saying it was. Like, it's just a lazy
sidestep.
Today, in the same conversation,
it's illegal. This is illegal. No no way
around it from every possible angle. The point
is not to forget that that's what he
was prom that Trump promised Israel when he
took the money from the oligarchs.
Two hundred million dollars. And the point is,
he would give them an West Bank annexation.
Trump desperate for Miriam Adelson's cash. Her condition,
West Bank annexation.
So just to compare them next to each
other,
rampant lawlessness of The US Government, all of
it, continues.
If only we could move beyond the childish
binary game called the two party illusion, the
primary block to actual positive change in this
country. Instead, the government continues to sell out
to the highest bidder or blackmailer.
I mean, it's just not hard to see
how this goes.
You know? How it's go how it started,
how it's going.
Very
clear.
Joe points out the overlap of Syria because
that's also involved with both US and Israeli
foreign policy. He said, I see it's the
the great Syrian revolution is coming along nicely.
Internal massacres against religious and ethnic minorities, selling
off what little industry it has to the
Gulf States and The United States, losing more
territory and now wanting to collaborate with Israel.
What a farce. Which by the way, those
of us paying attention wouldn't were telling you
that's where it was already going. As it
says, the Syrian president, when asked about the
relationship with Israel, says, we have common enemies
and we can play a major role in
the regional security.
Great. So like we told you, that's the
narrative. This is just one more extension of
this occupation dynamic. And it's it's the same
as Ukraine, by the way.
If you remember this.
Oh, big I'll say big Israel is what
it was.
Zelensky
from is from from Ukraine. Once in Ukraine
to be a big Israel.
I mean, how do we miss these overlaps?
It's obvious what this all comes back to.
This is the expansion. This is the greater
Israel project. The US government facilitating that, waging
wars for a foreign country at your expense.
And now, Syria, are we really not gonna
acknowledge this, the end endpoint? You know, that
these were Al Qaeda that we they spent
I mean, where are all the military personnel
out there that thought they were fighting Al
Qaeda? And now the US government, even in
Syria in particular.
And now the very government, whether left or
right, both of them, all of them,
just go, oh, now Syria is good now.
We'll take the bounty off your head, and
now you're the good guy. Like they've done
in every sit like with Saddam, like with
with Osama bin Laden,
the boogeyman today is the ally of The
US moments before. That's how this tends to
go. It's just wild. And now Israel takes
more territory. They're building bases. They're occupying more.
They are literally taking over this area. So
you military personnel, you fought and sacrificed so
Israel could take Syria?
Stand up.
Now Trump says new Iran deal must allow
US to blow up whatever we want. That's
how dumb this is getting. That's actually what
he said. I mean, so here we're at
a point now where you're gonna make a
deal with a group that
knows that you don't have anything sacred. That
the reason the last deal fell apart was
because of Donald Trump and his administration.
And so now we make another deal where
they can just do whatever they want. They
can bomb things in Iran, and that's okay.
I mean, who in the world is ever
gonna agree with that? But I think that's
the design. It's meant to create a circumstance
where it
appears that Iran is the one that doesn't
want to comply, just like the game they
play with Hamas. But we know how this
goes. They lie to you every time.
And that's why we're getting stuff like this.
As Patrick points out, Israel and the neocons
are now manipulating
the International Atomic Energy Agency's intel to fabricate
a case for preemptive nuclear strikes against Iran.
It's 02/2003
all over again. And this is from the
president of Israel
saying the the IAEA today issued a damning
unprecedented report exposing Iran's true goal.
Well, not really. That's the way they're framing
this, but the what it comes down to
is this report.
David Albright says, we have much more to
say about the report. And, you can read
through all of this. The bottom line is
the percentages.
APAC, of course, the totally not Israeli entity
says, Iran now has 408.6
kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60%.
This is enough for more than 10 nuclear
weapons
if further enriched to 90%, which is very
far away.
Iran has no civil reason to make this
60% material. Well, that's not inaccurate, but you
know this if you follow this show.
He says Iran cannot be trusted. Iran must
dismantle its nuclear program. You know? So, again,
the reality is that every country has a
right to any both nuclear weapon and civilian
program. That's the the international reality. They don't
get to dictate individual countries that don't. Israel
does the same thing.
Now aside from that point, which is just
the static reality,
the idea
that the most untrustworthy,
dishonest, caught lying every ten seconds government, whichever
one you wanna take for that, Israel or
The United States, is gonna say that that
one's the most dishonest. A group that has
not invaded any other country, that is not
I mean, what are we talking about here?
It's all mirrors and shadows about what they're
doing behind the scenes. I think it's certainly
possible. I wouldn't deny any of it. But
even that, if you're gonna say that everything
they've ever said about Iran is true, that
pales in comparison to what you can prove
The US alone or Israel alone have done.
But they're the boogeyman.
It's it's that that would going going back
to operation Ajax and the regime change of
that country, which turned it into a despotic
run by the Shah that only made it
good for the oligarchs of the West.
I mean, it's just it's never hard to
see how dishonest these people are. Now back
to the point.
The reality is, as you remember, the JCPOA,
the joint comprehension plan joint comprehensive plan of
action or the the Iran deal
was a deal that allowed
the civilian production of uranium
for civilian purposes, which arguably is the only
thing Iran has ever done. No one's ever
proved otherwise. They make a lot of claims,
and Israel's been telling you they're thirty seconds
away from bomb for twenty years.
So realize
they made that agreement because they'll tell you
that they would it's a religious,
violation for them to do that, though they
could be lying, of course.
And every single time this comes to pass,
they put forward the offer that we will
make a nuclear free Middle East. Every country
will sign on except Israel.
And they say, look. If everyone agrees to
get rid of all their nuclear power, well,
we will do it too. And, of course,
you could argue they're lying. But guess what?
Israel says never gonna happen even though we
don't have any, of course. And then The
US goes along with that, and they blame
Iran.
That's every single time. At the very least,
you should be considering that they may not
be lying, and Israel is the one that's
been manufacturing lies like they tend to do.
But aside from all of that, the reality
here, guys, is that what we're talking about
is the JCPOA
and that having two different articles. I think
it was '26 and '36. If I remember
correctly, I could be wrong. The point was
in that, they made very clear.
If The US or really any any entity
should do what they eventually did, which was
unilaterally pull out of the deal,
they then were legally within the deal allowed
to do this.
To this very day, they can increase the
enrichment until they come back to that deal.
Now that deal has long since been gone.
The bottom line though is that this was
only created because of Trump's administration and their
actions, just the US government, which then was
used. They wanted that to happen so they
can go, see. They're going against the deal.
Well, they didn't. The deal, even still in
place, if you wanna argue that, is allowing
that, that they were allowed to enrich uranium
until that went back in place. And so
it's just insane to argue that this is
anybody else's fault other than the US government,
but that's the whole way this is manufactured.
Now to the point of today,
the argument that they somehow have continued to
seek these weapons and Netanyahu would tell you
that they're moments away
is ridiculous on its face with them signing
those numbers. It's not there.
And 60% is a long way off from
90%. And especially if you wanna tell you
they've been working on this for what, a
decade and that's where they are? That's I
don't think that's the reality. The bottom line
is getting its 90% enrichment is the step
to then need to make the material, then
to make the the bombs to be used.
They're not even there yet.
So I just think it's insane for them
to always be hyping this as though thirty
seconds away timer when you literally know that
Israel has nuclear weapons. They have an option
called the Samson option, which even Seymour Hersh
wrote about, which says that should they believe
they're going to fall, they will send nuclear
weapons against everybody,
generally speaking.
And yet we're making this I mean, it
just seems absurd.
What they're trying to do is manufacture
the consent
for an attack on Iran. They've been doing
it for a very long time.
There's nothing new here happening. Now one of
the things you can consider, by the way,
which is a valid point, is that because
of all this pressure, they'll drive them in
some way or some factions in the government
to actually decide to do it, which still,
to the first point, would be their legal
right.
The only reason that people have this whole
thing is they're on evil terrorists because they
say that. Again, compare it to even what
you can prove, and there's a lot more
than that, than Israel has done, what The
US has done. And compare that to even
what they claim Iran has done, most of
which is false.
It's shocking how obvious it is that one
side is committing the worst atrocities in the
world, and the other side is being taken
advantage of. That's not good guy bad guy.
It's just objective what The US and the
Israel have been doing for the longest time.
Guys, they're quite literally committing a genocide while
they accuse Iran of being the bad guy.
Now
here's Insurrection Barbie,
who by the way is just still doing
her Zionist pro Israel thing. It's, you know,
at even conservatives,
like, pretty high level people in the Republican
side, have started to identify that this account
feels like some kind of Zionist bot account.
You can decide for yourself. It's propaganda. That's
for sure. And she says, poll. 57%
of Americans favor military action to stop Iran
from going nuclear?
That's Breitbart, of course.
I'm just I mean, I just not laugh
out loud when I read that. Anything's possible.
What I think is hilarious is that you
can look back at just about any poll
going back decades.
And every single time they get a major
poll, which we shouldn't trust polls anyway, but
they
come back every time. Most Americans do not
want more war, period. I mean, every single
time. That's why they have to manufacture us
to decide why it's necessary even though we
shouldn't and blah blah blah, the whole reluctant
hero shtick. Right? So if we're gonna try
to pretend that somehow 57% just randomly now
based on what want this war, even though
that's never the case, I find that impossible
to believe.
On top of
that, many parts of this conversation
understand that they're being lied to about this,
that Israel's been cartoonishly doing these things for
the longest time. I don't buy that.
My point is, this is them trying to
manufacture consent for what they are doing, which
is Israel's war
and that The US will be the one
to fight it, which, by the way, has
always been the plan,
which we will end with.
Netanyahu
has been maliciously influencing the US government for
decades,
all while pushing for Americans to die for
the Zionist agenda. None of these wars have
been in the interest of the Americans.
So we'll end with that. Thank you for
tuning in today.
I just
really think I mean, you tell me what
you think. You know, reach out to me,
send me something, comment.
Where do you place all this?
How clear is it to you? Do you
think the majority is obvious? I mean, do
you do you think that it's obvious to
the rest of the world that Israel was
the the culprit in all of this? I
do. I I mean, I think it is
one of the most obvious things in the
conversation, and that the best they can do
is maintain the illusion that not everybody agrees
and that you're the one that doesn't see
it, sorta like they did during COVID nineteen,
and we know they were lying about that.
There it's never in the establishment in the
the authority power the power's interest
to admit that they've lost control.
Never will they come out and say that.
So at least stand back and consider that
if and when and should that be the
case, then they would lie about it. Right?
So maybe that's what's going on.
Worth considering at the very least, but help
me get this information out. Share this. Get
it in front of people, guys. I'm I'm
seeing a breakthrough on the conservative side or
more so even the republican side of this
that are just suddenly going, wow. Okay. This
is obviously not what I want. Even though
they're still very much on one side of
the partisan,
this is a a stretch too far.
So help me reach out. Thank you all
for being here.
I love you all, as always. Question,
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
If you take away the Soviet Union and
its chief proxy, the PLO,
international terrorism would collapse.
If you take out Saddam,
Saddam's regime, I guarantee
you that it will have enormous positive reverberations
on the region. Obviously, we like to see
a regime change, at least I would, in
Iran, just as I would like to see
in Iraq. The question now is a practical
question.
What is the best place to proceed? It's
not a question of whether Iraq's regime should
be taken out, but when should it be
taken out? It's not a question of whether
you'd like to see a regime change in
Iran, but how do it Are there any
other nations that you would recommend that The
United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this
point? The answer is categorically yes. The,
the two nations that are vying, competing with
each other, who will be the first to
achieve nuclear weapons,
is Iraq and Iran. But, a third nation,
by the way, is Libya as well. Libya
is
trying very rapidly to build
an atomic bomb capability. So you have here
now three nations. All stand together to stop
Iran's march of conquest,
subjugation,
and terror.
I know that
no matter on which side of the aisle
you sit,
you stand with Israel.
Let me let me preface these remarks with
I never, never, ever believe
Israeli figures.