All gene based vaccines,
independent of manufacturers,
produce the same result
in the vaccinees.
He has looked at fifteen
in the last four days. The number has
been increased to seventy
individuals who died after vaccination.
These will be who died at home,
at work, in the car,
doing their sports,
etcetera etcetera etcetera.
There's no question now anymore
about what is going on
and the answer is
in the organs of these people.
In ninety percent,
he found
clear
evidence
for autoimmune
self attack
by killer lymphocytes
on the
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality
reality reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Saturday,
05/31/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
Obviously, some major developments all across the news
today regarding Palantir.
Really difficult to not just start screaming I
told you so today for a lot of
us and having this conversation for,
I don't know, a decade, if not longer.
And I mean that legitimately going back to
the conversation of, you know, if you even
go even further if you understand the idea
of total information awareness and Whitney's discussions around
that for a very long time that became
Palantir.
So if you don't understand that point, we're
not gonna really fixate on that today. But
understanding that Palantir,
it the same way we talk about XAI
as the DARPA program becoming XAI as Elon's
program,
the US government put out something called total
information awareness. Just type it in. It's actually
very easy to search. The weird
logo will probably make you feel like it's
fake, but it's definitely real. And the whole
the the name explains it.
Total information awareness of all different types, not
just, you know, video, not just audio, and
every single thing they could possibly collect. That
got pushed back on aggressively by most people
in this country, so they did what they
usually do. And they go, oh, okay. We
won't do that, except they were planning either
on doing that the entire time or usually
when you push back, they just find another
avenue. A lot of us tend to think
that it's sort of a putting out the
most,
you know, bombastic version, so you are okay
with something that's a little bit less but
what they always wanted. Something to consider. Bottom
line is Palantir
is what that became.
Even top even the original funding even coming
from In Q Tel, the CIA
is and for a long time, they're only
contractor. And now the way it's developing today,
if you have not seen if you haven't
been following our work, the last American Vagabond
at large, all the people involved with the
last American Vagabond, including,
well, not every one of them, but specifically
Whitney and Derek and myself or Unlimited Hangout,
Whitney's work going back a long way where
that started before that Tea Lab, before that
Mint Press News. Derek's work going back a
very long way on the very conversation.
Most people in the IMA
calling this out for a very long time.
The the interesting thing around
the the, you know, being called black pill
for saying that the two chosen selections for
the election pre process was, you know, not
what we should be leading into. This was
a major part of what we were calling
out. So that's the most I'm gonna do
in regard to I told you so, but
it's important to recognize that, you know, if
you getting actually, start with a point to
talk about demonstrating our value for this platform,
to show you how much work we've done
on this in particular.
And a a few things I wanna start
with in general, actually, but I I I
think before
well,
outlining the show in general today, we're gonna
talk about Palantir, an important overlap. Really, the
the surveillance AI,
you know, great reset kind of technocracy, all
the different converging ideas. Whatever you think of
those words, we can see these the the
implementation
of a lot of this. And so today
is that's the main arching point. But we're
gonna talk about to start
health
and how important this is. And interestingly timed,
an incredible story that we're gonna discuss, which
actually actually came out,
the date of the article was oh, technically,
that came out today. I thought this was
something that came so the FDA has approved
a shot we're gonna discuss that I think
it was approved not today, yesterday or the
day before, but an approved mRNA COVID shot.
After everything we just discussed, after everything RFK
just said, on top of that, we'll get
into the idea of whether a placebo was
even used. Now there's a difference of whether
you need to use a placebo for certain
kinds of procedures or certain kinds of trials.
But we all like to believe that in
at least one part of this process, there
would have been a placebo used. Turns out
it wasn't. And we'll go over what that
means and why that's contradictory
and incredibly showing you how they're using a
previous mRNA shot to compare the new one
to, which is exactly what we talked about
during this. And I don't care what process
we're discussing, whether it's even to see if
it's more efficacious. The bottom line is you're
comparing it to something that we know is
deadly. I'm not we we shouldn't be pulling
away from acknowledging that very obvious undeniable point.
Weirdly enough, that RFK Jr would have told
you the same so many months ago. But
we're gonna go over how that relates, but
then overlap that with why that's a problem
with the artificial intelligence and how that dovetails
with Palantir,
Doge, all the things we're discussing today. And,
really,
you know, what we have been saying for
a really long time, that this has been
collecting into one massive database,
whether whether it's the immigration justification or any
number of things we've discussed. Sadly enough, I
this is one of those moments where you
just hate being right. This is exactly
exactly what we are worried about. Now let's
be clear. That's why I titled it new
with the quotes. Just because New York Times
or others were pointing to this does not
make this new. The problem is that it
seems clearly that the
shift is legitimate and not just what we
seem to be reading along, you know, piecing
things together. And it's not, again, not just
because they wrote that, but because of the
pieces that you can see in place. And
so it's important to lay this out for
everybody who a lot right now are simply
going, Oh, the New York Times. I can't
believe you fell for that. That's the kind
of ignorance we see from the partisanship
where, yes, New York Times lies all the
time, so does left and right media on
every angle. But that doesn't mean you should
reflexively ignore it as if it usually, that
happens when it's something that you don't want
to agree with, so you go, well, it's
that partisan side. Yeah. They could be lying,
but they also could be using the truth
in other manipulative ways, which would still make
it the truth. We'll talk about all of
that. Before we get into it, I wanted
to, highlight,
one thing I thought was really, really cool.
I'm gonna somebody sent me this. This is
what's sitting right here with me. Shout out
to Eric who sent me this, and it
simply says, thanks, Ryan, for everything you do
for others.
It existed.
And includes you can't see it from this
far away, but here's the picture for you.
Look closely at that. Oh, I guess I
can't zoom in
the way this is on there. Here, let
me do this. This will make it easier
to zoom in on it.
Just put it on the browser so you
guys can actually see it. So you can
see what it says because that's the important
part. Really means a lot to me, like,
more than you more than you could possibly
know. Here here is the the shot of
it.
And if you zoom in real close and
you guys have seen these. I I'm actually
pretty, you know, I'm pretty elated that they
actually have this in my hand. I actually
don't know how rare these are. I imagine
this is pretty rare, but it simply says
Palestine,
Nineteen Twenty Seven. And as he
says, existed. We all know that. You know
that. Anybody honest out there knows that, but
it's still very, very cool for him to
send that to me. And I just wanna
give a shout out to all of you
out there who send us things, and we
do our best to get back to every
single one with handwritten we can. Some things
fall through the cracks. I wonder how many
I don't even get these days. And in
general, emails and other notes, you know, it
just we I guarantee we don't get back
to everybody, but I hope you all know
how much it means to me and everybody
else involved more than you could possibly know.
And that is special to me. So thank
you, Eric, and whoever else is out there
sending us stuff and commenting or even just
sending us positive energy. Definitely need it today.
Now
let's go into a couple of quick starting
points I wanted to highlight before we get
started with the, a the health overlap and
shouting to a recent, restreamed interview we just
put out. First, I wanted to make sure
you saw this. Odysee put this out, and
this is important. K? This is what we've
been telling you has been coming. There's been
some some hitches in the in the the
process, like we said, is pretty much customary
or, you know, it's what you expect when
you're going through something new like this. As
they build out these new portals, they're calling
it, from the decentralized Internet,
it's kinda leading the charge when it comes
to the, you know,
uncensorable content today. And the Independent Media Alliance
was they reached out to us when we
first started this and they wanted that to
be sort of the flagship version of this
portal. So we're honored to be a part
of that. And so you can read through
through this for yourself. It simply says led
by Whitney Webb, Derek Rose, and Ryan Christian,
the Independent Media Alliance will pioneer Odysee's revolutionary
portal technology in the emerging decentralized
media ecosystem. The link here is to the
TLav page that shows you our our kind
of press release. But pretty this is on
business wire. It's pretty I mean, you just
gotta think about how interesting this is that
as much as people try to relegate us
to some kind of fringe side, you know,
the last American Vagabond or just our ecosystem
and or just independent media alliances is probably
the best way to look at it now
because not every part of this is tied
in a T Lab as much as that
may I'm hoping that doesn't seem that way
because we're using the platform to broadcast right
now just out of default.
But it's important to see that as the
Independent Media Alliance, a lot of us get
kind of pushed aside as somehow not relevant.
But you realize what a big deal this
is. And And the fact that this is
being put out as a massive press release
from one of the most primary platforms and
pointing to what we're doing as the central
part of that, I guarantee you that frustrates
a lot of people who like to pretend
like we are not as influential as we
are. So that's a shout out to all
of you out there and everyone supporting us
and everything that we're doing. You're making waves,
guys. Just recognize that. It's powerful.
Now what we're gonna highlight today, just to
make sure you see it right out of
the gate, is an important conversation. And we're
gonna come back to this right away after
the health point, but I just wanted it
to be early and seen. This is the
article that's being discussed. New York Times. Trump
taps Palantir to compile data on Americans.
This is from the thirtieth. It's yesterday.
But what what's interesting about it is the
question should be asked, why is the New
York Times
suddenly reporting on this? This has gone back
way before Donald Trump.
I mean, to the degree we're seeing it
today, it's all really falling into place. And
they've been given really, what it is, it's
the overlap with the AI push, what DOGE
was doing, which is the same thing as
far as I'm concerned, and I'll make that
case as we go through here. And and
then Palantir and the scooping up of that
data and applying it to what they're doing,
as well as the overseas genocide and everything
else happening, which they're involved with, it's simply
important to see how that is what really
changes the scene. But Palantir has been doing
what they've been doing for a long time
and even overlap with the US government for
a long time. Very important to understand that.
That's why for those of us that are
aware of the two party illusion, it's important
to see that this continues from administration to
administration.
All of the presidents and everybody else around
them involved in their own way, usually profiting
off the process, And that's a lot that's
happening right now as well. Homan and others,
you know, profiting off of the prison system
in regard to the immigration dynamic, which is
all run by you know, we'll get into
all of this.
Important to understand this. But that's the article
we're gonna read through. But, again, to demonstrate
our value, recognize how long we have been
screaming about this. This goes back to Palantir
in regard to,
around well, actually, I forgot the other one
too, around COVID nineteen, where Palantir was tapped
during COVID nineteen in the same die the
same ways. This was, pay this is from
02/2018, Whitney Webb. Palantir, the PayPal offshoot becomes
a weapon in the war against whistleblowers and
WikiLeaks.
You see, this is not a new conversation.
It's actually really important to understand why and
how much this ties into a larger building
technocratic agenda. This is important to see. We
talked about this the '20 the thirteenth, '20
'20 '4. Palantir joins Gaza genocide. We'll talk
about that as we go through. This one
is twenty twenty four October,
and Derek writing about the upcoming selection.
So think about all this building. Right? Election
twenty twenty four, Zionist technocrats versus Zionist technocrats.
Had you been reading this and aware, you
might have been much more aware of what
was going on if you are just finding
out about a lot of this stuff. And,
look, TLAB was not even remotely the only
platform making these cases. But realize how it's
interesting to see the difference.
Most partisans are even being forced to acknowledge
this kind of conversation
now, you know, now that it's too late
for that to affect the actual
process of the selection.
Meet Peter Thiel's acolytes in Donald Trump's second
administration. This was February 2025. Derrick Brose has
been breaking this down quite a lot, going
over the different people that are basically
like he like he writes, Thiel acolytes that
have been put into Trump's administration.
He points over to the man whose philosophy
is guiding all of it, it seems. And
this was, specifically
I'm blanking on his name. It's I don't
wanna look down. I'm trying to remember. Curtis
Yarvin.
Meet the man whose philosophy has influenced Peter
Thiel and his technocrats.
That's this man right here. And that's come
this is that whole
you know, we've talked about this, the Andreessen
point and the, like, the the good elitist
saying you saving you from the other elitists.
That's the mindset they have. Really, I'd made
the point that Joe Rogan showed that oligarchy
is what's gonna save you from oligarchy.
It's wild. It's wild what's happening, and they're
really trying to train everybody.
Twenty twenty five March, Donald Trump, Peter Thiel,
and the technocrats.
Does a great job breaking all this down.
And then I did a show called The
Great Palantir Reset, 04/21/2025,
talking about this exact conversation.
Like, literally this conversation
on the converse building off the immigration and
how that was being built using that argument.
Derek and I had talks about this before
Trump got elected in the conversation about how
Palantir and the immigration discussion would be used
exactly this way.
Zoe Smith and I talked April 23, and
this title the in the interview was entitled
COVID surveillance, Palantir, and the transition to total
information awareness, all of exactly what's happening right
now. This was me and seven c's discuss
seven c's and myself discussing the interview entitled
the Palantir Control Structure and the Globalist Endgame,
April 29.
Then Derek put the article out April 24
right before this. Welcome to the Palantir World
Order.
And Danwell outlines
exactly what we're gonna discuss today, what's going
on in general, what people are only now
kind of waking up to. And here is
a tag for this the Palantir conversation, all
of which, you know, any show in here
we discussed Palantir, it was tagged, will be
included. So we'll come back to this briefly.
We'll go over some points that really, so
this point forward is kind of where where
I want you to build this overarching point.
So you have the health discussion
and how that overlaps, and I'm gonna go
over, like, kind of the building quickly time
frame of
pre Twitter election or rather Twitter and and
Trump election and then the building of that
AI direction going through x and xAI and
all these overlaps until we come into the
point we're at now. So first, I wanna
make sure you didn't miss that we restreamed
the interview that Taylor did that was amazing.
And this is this is if of all
that we've done on this platform, I am
per the most proud of this piece of
work, which is Taylor's outstanding work, and all
all the credit goes to her. Now, T
Lab funded this entire thing and so it's
important for me that this gets as much
reach as possible because she puts so much
into this, so much work and effort and
time. And, of course, because it's us, because
it's what we're doing, it gets suppressed, it
gets stepped on. Can you only imagine if
any one of a number of people simply
pointed to this? Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Alex
Jones, simply just barely pointed to this interview.
It would be the most this is if
you haven't seen this,
it's entitled pathologist Arna Burkhart final interview,
revealing the grave dangers of mRNA vaccines. It
is profound. It is science based. He is
one of the before he passed away, suspiciously
in my opinion, one of the leading
pathologists in the world. And he came out
of retirement to investigate
this and broke it down in real time
through this entire interview and proved what we
already know today.
I'm just saying it's a really important interview,
and he the the reason we shared it
again yesterday was because that was the anniversary
the
when he passed away. And so it's important
to or excuse me, when they did the
interview. So it's important to
remember that.
But really important discussion because this overlaps with
where we're going. The artificial intelligence direction, the
biometric, you know, the the technocratic direction through
health, but understanding that they've already
you know, we know what's going on. We
know how dangerous this is. So that's important
to understand once we go into the next
shot conversation. Weirdly enough, by the way, not
that I'm gonna say that I will tell
you this is what happened. Frankly, I find
it hard to believe.
Even though we do have influence, I think,
weirdly enough, right when we started this interview,
literally, right when we started it and pretty
much right when it ended, Twitter had a
random outage.
Exactly right at that moment though, and then
it stopped.
That's just that's ridiculous.
I mean, you can look at yourself. The
timing is almost exact
and ends almost right when we're done. Like,
I mean, to a tee, maybe, like, five
minute difference. That's the only time I've had
an outage the entire time. So I just
find that very telling. If you understand how
important this is to a larger agenda, maybe
that does make sense. I don't know. I
can't prove that. Find find it interesting.
And I also put it out on, Substack
for that very reason because, you know, it'll
get suppressed. Check it out, please. Help it
get reached. It is one of the most
important interviews regard in the context of the
COVID nineteen conversation. And by the way, that's
not just my opinion. Watch it for yourself.
I've don't I've never met a person who
hasn't watched this and went like, that is
the most important interview in this conversation. But
yet, you know why it gets suppressed.
Now one thing I wanna show you on
health before we go through some of this
because I just wanted you guys to see
this, and I wanna hopefully motivate some of
you to get out there and do these
kind of things for yourselves to break away
from the controlled health sick sickness system that
we're in.
I've really been trying to put my money
where mouth is when it comes
to gardening and and, you know, all that
we talk about, guys. And so that's one
of the reasons why we put moved further
away and got more land. And so I
wanted to quickly play these for you so
you can see what what we've been doing
in the background.
This and this is just my personal
you know, there's multiple parts to this. So
that's my little jalapeno tree we planted. That's
eucalyptus,
Couple of things, chives, cilantro, that's growing some
small ones. There's some peppers there.
That's a random flower that I'm growing. But
then you got, you know, different that's heart
sense. There's a butternut squash growing.
Here you got
fennel,
a big fennel bush. There's two things of
broccoli growing right there.
That's a pineapple, if you can believe that.
Some beans,
doing pretty well, actually. Lot of them pretty
we've already gotten a pretty good haul off
of it. There's some tarragon.
There's, some regular tomatoes.
Next to it is I forget the name
of it. It's in
this plant was meant it really works too.
You plant it, and then then the moles
actually stop coming around because they don't like
the smell or something. That and then just
you can see a bunch of cilantro
and a bunch of,
basil.
And I'm just I'm proud of this, you
know, and and it's a small thing. I
mean, this is just my my beginning effort,
and they're more than this as well.
Here, we just a couple more things. There's
some some lavender, and we got a bunch
of lettuce and different things growing.
And then this one is the the larger
kind of out in the middle spot where
we just got a bunch more. There's, you
know, some peppers there, some more tomatoes.
This one is a bunch of, there's some
onions,
some more some more radish right there.
That's a,
eggplant,
and then just a whole bunch of lettuce.
Now a lot of this is what we're
trying to do is because we make our
own dog food. And and it's important to,
you know, at least try to grow some
of that to cut down the cost. And
I, you know, just think this stuff's really
important, guys. And I really think this is
where we should all be going, and I'm
we're only gonna keep expanding. I'm just trying
to hopefully get you guys motivated to do
it yourselves in any way you can, whether
that's one small little garden on the edge
of your apartment building, you know, balcony, growing
some some
cilantro or onions or whatever. You know, it
it's the small things, guys. One little step.
And it's the idea, like, we talk about
where you go, you know, well, they already
have all of our information. Why why even
try? It's like that's the last thing you
should do even if that is true. Right?
Once and in this case, that just means
is one more thing you can eat that's
healthy and not that that all the better
for you. So, hopefully, I didn't waste too
much time. I just wanted you guys to
see that, and I I am proud of
it, but I think that this will help
motivate others to do the same kind of
thing.
Now
we I wanna start with the COVID nineteen
shot point because, like we titled today, there's
a new shot that came out. Now Sar
Sasha Latapova made this case, which I think
is important to follow-up on because this is,
I think, part of the same conversation or
rather deception. Now she wrote, Eugenics for Dummies,
until yesterday, I still had hoped for the
integrity of at least some individuals in the
HHS. Unfortunately, I had to give up on
the hope that the video was posted after
this post was posted next. And that's HHS,
RFK Jr, and the rest endorsing the COVID
shot. Not for everybody. Yes. They walked it
back for some areas, but it is still
being recommended for some people and it's still
being used, and that's the line we've drawn
on this. That's deadly, dangerous, and and RFK
doesn't agree with that as he said every
moment up until he got into power.
Regardless of what you think about that, as
I said even, it's still a small incremental
objective step away from the problem, but the
problem is that we still know they know
this and you're deadly. And as we now
see more shots rolling out, it seems seems
to be a little bit of a sidestep.
But Sasha Ladakhova
rightly found out
they didn't even actually do that,
at least not yet. And that's why I
said I was gonna give it a few
days, and so here we are. Okay? So
as we can tell, as she's pointing out
that on the schedule right now that everyone
does still look to, it does not say
what they're claiming. Maybe it will happen tomorrow,
but maybe not. And it's worth being critical
right now because of all the other things
that we continue to see where we're being
lied to. So there's plenty more that she
goes into on this thread, but let me
show you what she's highlighting here. So this
is the actual schedule. So you can still
see very clearly that there is a COVID
nineteen shot,
and it just simply says see notes. So
if you click on the notes, here's what
it says. And you could look down every
part of this under routine vaccinations for COVID
nineteen. It says age 19 and older who
are not moderately or severely immunocompromised.
One, two doses for unvaccinated. Right there. There's
no caveat to say, well, if you're unhealthy
or if you're, you know, healthy, you don't
need it. That's not there. Now, yes, they
did publicly say to some degree that, but
where's the actual change?
This is the schedule they're referencing, so that's
pretty upsetting. But maybe tomorrow, maybe the day
after that. Maybe it takes longer. Maybe it's
gonna be a couple weeks until they update
the website, which would be ridiculous to me,
quite frankly. But maybe. And when that happens,
then we could point to it and say,
oh, good. It did happen. Right now, if
you're saying that it's happened, it hasn't. It's
like them floating we're about to do something.
As far as I'm concerned, it didn't actually
happen, which is really upsetting because I even
I hope that there will be some positive
change in this.
Now Mary Talley Bowden wrote it and this
is think about this.
In regard to, first, the shot still being
recommended in any way, let alone not being
put off the way they said. Secondarily, that
new shots are rolling out that are mRNA.
The reality is that mRNA technology remains under
tested,
says the comms director Andrew Nixon from HHS.
So you're open you're willing to admit publicly
that that mRNA technology,
which we should know by now, if you
watch this platform especially,
is not just under tested. I mean, it's
being experimented on on us. That's what I
think. Either way, yes. That's a fair way
to put it. And yet you're still allowing
these shots to roll out? You wanna make
sense of that for me? That's not liberty
or freedom, guys. That's insane. And they're framing
it under somehow. Like, if this was a
Democrat for the Republicans that pretend like this
makes sense, you would be losing your minds.
Just be honest about that. Stop being hypocritical
about the reality. It's not left and right.
It's your government and what they do to
you. So what we can see here is
insane, and she says, pull the shots. I
agree. That's just one example. Now on top
of that, as of today,
the FDA approves Moderna's next generation COVID vaccine
for adults 65 and older. So regardless yeah.
So it's not everybody, but it's 65 years
no. 65 and older. It's a shot specifically
for the people that needed the least, that
are gonna hurt rather that are gonna get
hurt the most by it, the children and
the elderly.
And it is mRNA,
and it will blow your mind that we're
still doing the same things.
So, I simply said, the current administration has
just approved yet another mRNA COVID shot injection
and as you'll read right here,
where is it? There we go.
It says earlier phase one and phase two
trials focused on safety dosing and immunogenicity,
but did not use a placebo. Typically involved
dose ranging or comparisons to existing vaccines. So
we'll go through this. The point is, if
you're gonna use something to test for safety,
the idea of placebo is monumental. And the
RFK, as I'll show you here, even just
made a big thing about this. Plans placebo
testing for all new vaccines. There shouldn't be
anything other than that. That's what our point
is, and he agrees.
But we're talking saline placebo, and that's when
you're doing a safety test.
Anything other is manipulation. Now in regard to,
let's say, efficacy, they play this game where
they can go well. We we do another
vaccine to compare. That's, in my mind, the
same and same point. Now two things to
make in this. One, they used another vaccine
to do the efficacy testing. And two, apparently,
there was no placebo test in any case
in regard to this new shot. Let me
show you. So keeping this in mind, that
seems wildly hypocritical, does it not? That he
comes out on May 1 and says,
placebo trial testing for all new vaccines, and
then the first the next new vaccine that
comes out appears to not be in that
line. Let me show you. Here is Moderna's
page for May
31.
It's called the M NEXT spike.
That's the, I guess, the official name. Today
announced the the Moderna today announced the FDA
has approved,
and apparently, it was an approval. I looked
into that as well. It was it's not
emergency authorization.
But apparently, it was the the long term
investigation was about was 2023 until now. The
end of twenty twenty three until now.
So even that, which is much longer than
the extremely ridiculous COVID nineteen time frame, but
it's also much shorter than everyone's before that.
So if we know that it took, well,
as they say, years to test these things
before mRNA,
then mRNA came out and it's more dangerous
and more untested. And then they roll this
out and it's done within a couple of
years. That feels wrong, guys. That's not reality.
That that this should be at least as
much as they were testing before. So, let's
understand that truncated time frame as much as
longer. That's think of it like we just
talked about. Right? So, they roll out a
ridiculous thing where they're saying, give us two
weeks. We pump out a new one. And
we all say no. So, they go, okay.
Let's make it two year let's make it
a couple years, when reality should be longer
than that. Or at the very least,
these things shouldn't be used at all is
what I think. But the point is mRNA
one two eight three is the name of
this shot. So it is mRNA. That's very
clear. The FDA's approval of mNexSpike is based
on the results
from a randomized observer blind
active controlled phase three clinical trial. And it
says, which enrolled approximately 11,400
participants under age 12 or older. So we're
gonna talk about this and what that means.
And observer blind that's the point is that
doesn't have to be a placebo. But my
point is that all of these, the the
shot should not be being used if at
some point it was not tested with a
placebo in regard to its safety.
What it says here
is precipitate they received either
ten milligrams of mRNA one two eight three
or
fifty of
I just not milligrams. Excuse me. But just
I think that's what, I forget the exact
term. I think it was anyway. The point
is 10 of mRNA one two eight three
and fifty of mRNA one two seven three.
And it says
the the new tested shot has a nine
point three percent higher
relative
vaccine efficacy.
Relative. We all know that game. Maybe I
should play it again.
Compared to the other shot. So right there,
the point is, if you're gonna try to
tell me that this thing is more effective
when you're comparing it to something that we
know killed people, what are we even talking
about? And if you're saying it's 9.3%
more effective than something that didn't seem to
work, what are we talking about?
I mean, these are not my opinions alone,
guys. This seems to be broadly the
well, let's you get well, the what they're
even reporting.
Where was it? This one here. The
public turning away of the COVID nineteen vaccine
majority suspect heart damage. We don't suspect anything.
The world is now pretty damn clear on
what these things were doing. Even they are
beginning to point that out.
So that just seems wild to me. Now
going through this
to the next part, here's what Grok had
to say. Just to con what so we're
seeing this in their own documentation, but in
case those think somehow that's not accurate, if
you think Grok is somehow more insightful, even
though it's wrong half the time, just worth
that point for people out there that wanna
see it. It says, receive full USD approval
or use in, oh, this this was the
part right here.
Was placebo used in the trial? And if
so, was it a saline or something else?
And it says phase three trial did not
use a placebo because it was a randomized,
observer blind, active control study comparing the two
shots. Participants were assigned to receive either one
or the other with no placebo arm included.
The argument being that for some people that
that's not necessary in that kind of overlap.
I flatly disagree. I don't think you should
be comparing it to another shot that is
already disputed.
But this says, in regard to the vaccine,
have a placebo at all.
And it says, vaccine did not have a
placebo based trial for phase three, which we
just know, it just established, but it says
instead, the trial was a randomized, observed blind,
active control study comparing those two with no
placebo arm. Earlier, this is what I was
interested in, phase one or phase two trials,
starting in early twenty twenty three, also focused
on safety, dosing, and immunogenicity,
so safety,
but did not use a placebo.
They typically involved dose ranging or comparisons to
existing vaccines, which is what the data shows.
So no placebo.
I find that insane with what we just
talked about. On top of the fact that
we know these things are not to begin
with, the one that's being compared to is
not something we should be using.
Oh, and this was, oh, this is the
same thing. This is from applied COCA trials.
Data shows the novel vaccine produced an immune
response against SARS CoV-two greater than Moderna's licensed
COVID nineteen vaccine.
Right. So I mean, that might as well
be nothing. The the the terrible thing works
a little better than the other terrible thing.
That doesn't seem like something that would be
a good sales pitch for me. Now it
says the randomized observer blind, same point. It
simply just says
assigned either one shot or the other.
So as the public turns away from these
shots, just may again, recognize even McCarrie just
told you that most half of medical workers
were saying no to this thing. Let's not
pretend like we don't know very clearly that
they know everybody sees what this is, like,
in a majority sense.
So that's why we get this. May 21,
FDA expands COVID vaccine warning
about health side effects for young males. Yeah.
Well, too late there, guys. You know, four
years too late. The idea is that you're
expanding it. You're not this is something that
is killing people. That's what the causing all
these myocarditis and heart attacks and blood clots,
which we know. The science has proven that.
It's not my opinion. And so if you're
just gonna expand the warning, it it's it's
like saying you know, it's like the same
point. Expand the warning label on a bottle
of poison. You know, this is a silly
thing to do. But the point is, as
you're doing that,
and then you push out more COVID shots,
kinda feels like an illusion, doesn't it? Seeing
as how, again, they're rolling out a new
COVID nineteen shot.
Now Adam Rowland, who, if you remember, we've
discussed we we work we, had an interview
with him, and this is he's a trainer
in regard to some pretty high level athletes.
And he was discussing what this was doing
and his pushback against the whole thing and
him getting penalized for it, his job. Now
he says, so everyone that was awake and
knew not to get the COVID jab, and
he put awake in quotes, you do know
RFK Jr and company have approved a self
replicating mRNA vaxx quietly in the background while
they BS you with lies and they have
stopped the COVID shot for young children and
pregnant women.
They are doing so, and it they're they
are doing it, so it doesn't matter if
you refuse the shot. They will get you
anyway. That's his opinion, but I I agree.
This is what we already talked about.
Arcturus.
Now, technically, it's it's got the name,
where was it? So if you see it
circulating
I thought I had it highlighted.
I think it's right here. Where was that
one? Oh, it's right here. It's.
How do you say that?
Right there.
CoStave. Now this was already approved in the
European Union. So this is going around, guys,
and this is, for the podcast, a self
amplifying mRNA
bird flu injection.
Self amplifying.
S o s a mRNA.
And and what doctor Sherry Tenpenny has to
say. While they were tinkering around with mRNA
shot removal,
as the self amplifying RNA shot was fast
tracked and now approved.
Even though, by the way, they just floated
the we yanked the MRN or rather the
Moderna shot,
right, for $766,000,000.
So everyone went, yay. They pulled that one,
and then they approved this one or they
rolled these out. This this is a manipulation
as far as I can tell. At the
very least, it's it's contradictory.
And she says, they played us Mercari played
us as he smirked at the TV cameras.
Will humanity
survive? What was the point of this?
I'm just glad to see some people have
the courage to call this out regardless of
partisanship, guys.
So some of the points I wanna highlight
before we get into everything else. Remember, all
of this overlaps to the artificial intelligence discussion,
Palantir surveillance. So we have health side surveillance,
we've got immigration justification surveillance, And the point
today is we've got them collecting all of
your data from a thousand different sources in
one centralized database, which is probably already what
it's been for a while, but, you know,
possibility possible anyway. And all of this coming
together in real time. But really quickly, in
case you didn't want you didn't see this,
I'm not gonna get into discussion of immigration
or specifically the deportation point. But this was
a Danish father of four
who'd been here for a decade plus,
who was going to his meet pretty much
his last interview to become a citizen. He
had a green card already. And they claim
he had some old paperwork issue from 02/2015,
and they put him in jail, and he's
been there ever since.
Now the part that might add to this
for those that wanna pretend like it's not
happening, turns out he's a very clear MAGA
Trump supporter. So just if you if you
and that was my point last time as
well. It should matter no matter what. His
rights are being violated, whether he's black or
brown or white or
Muslim, Christian, or Jew. It doesn't matter. The
point is we always knew this would broaden
out, and it was already meant to do
that. And it's just about I mean, I
still wonder whether he was saying something about
Israel somewhere. I mean, who knows what was
the justification? Either way, they don't wanna even
double back on this.
So as I wrote, the the show the
show was called Ice Unjustly Imprisons Danish Dad
of Four. So here's the update. There's that
show we went in-depth. Here's the show the
update from a couple days ago. A Danish
green card holder and father of four was
denied bail.
So not only is he in jail right
now based on some old thing for basically
no logical reason,
but they denied bail on top of it
to keep him in jail,
probably because it'll be a bad public publicity
for them. But
denied bail after being detained by ICE during
what was supposed to be, excuse me, his
final citizenship interview.
This is in Tennessee.
After receiving his green card in 2013,
he began the naturalization process but unknowingly missed
a key immigration file of, filing deadline back
in 02/2015. Now he's had plenty of meetings
and engagement ever since then.
Around the same time, at 02/2015,
they suffered a stillbirth, lost their child. So
maybe they had something going on that justified
them missing a piece of paperwork that would
be dealt with a different way if we
weren't dealing with this massive kind of
collapse of our country. I don't know what
you wanna call it. I mean, the point
is the other circumstance, they would have simply
been like, hey. You know, let's let's discuss
this, and you could prove that you are
here. I mean, he's here legally. He's going
to these meetings. So this seems like a
justification
regardless of where it is. Is this seem
like one of the most dangerous people they
should be going after, which if you actually
understand it is not the I'll go into
this next show. The data shows you that
they're not going after the most dangerous people.
They have a few of them sprinkled through
it. Yeah. But that's not what's happening. And
all of these screaming sycophants out there act
like they're all rapists and murderers because they
just don't care or they don't know any
better.
On 04/15/2025,
after 2015
being the date when the paperwork thing happened,
he was detained at his meeting without warning
by ICE during the scheduled meeting and scheduled
meeting, and he was later transferred to the
to Louisiana
because they know that's more amenable to what
they're trying to accomplish. They jam they went
Ozturk and the rest. They're just throwing them
into a place that's not gonna care that
they're basically there illegally. Castro was detained for
a paperwork miscommunication.
That's what they wrote in 02/2015.
And I was sent home with no explanation
and no idea where my husband had been
transferred.
Is that how that should work?
Right? Is is it now is he now
one of these dirty rapist gang members so
it doesn't matter if his rights don't matter?
Or is he a Trump supporting guy who's
white, who's being arrested, and they still swept
him away and didn't tell his wife, didn't
have a warrant, didn't show anything?
Now, yes, the the the idea that, like,
even saying that you took him there, like,
these things are this is the general process
that we're in this country. That you can't
just whisk somebody away with no justification,
no legal I mean, this is a this
is a Gestapo, guys.
What what I was just hoping is this
can reach some of those people out there
that pretend because they don't want to look
that this already isn't happening.
At a court hearing on May 28, an
immigration judge agreed to reopen his case, but
somehow still denied him bond.
Meaning, he must remain in detention until they
figure this out. Probably, like, an El Salvador
overlap, they drag their feet for the next
year. Casper has been voc a vocal Trump
supporter on social media, often pushing the as
they pray, debunked election fraud theories and calling
him to impeach Joe Biden. So regardless of
how they frame that, recognize the point is
he's somebody who'd be standing right next to
you, cheering for the same things you are,
and he's currently in prison.
How who knows how long because he they
just decided to do that because they had
an opportunity to get one more person they
can call an immigrant off the street. And
right now, on paperwork, they're screaming another illegal
immigrant. They're doing it everywhere. Arresting people that
were allowed in this country by the previous
administration and saying they're all legal immigrants because
you don't agree with Biden's policies. No. They
decided to trust our government and that was
their that was the biggest mistake of their
lives despite the fact that they have no
reason to assume they're gonna be double crossed
by the same government. And they got illegal
aliens and all these screaming idiots like Lure
called them all a bunch of terrorist rapists
that they shouldn't have children. That's the world
that we're living in right now despite the
fact
that you can prove the vast majority of
them have no criminal record and most were
here legally.
And you could say I could say that
a hundred times over and prove it 15
times, and yet we still have to debate
it every time.
Just understanding how important that is. Now we're
gonna come back to that in the next
show. One last point on
this. DC Draino says it's time to start
arresting CEOs who knowingly hire
illegal aliens.
Oh, I said breaking news. DC Draino calls
for the arrest of Donald Trump and Elon
Musk, or should we assume he didn't mean
all CEOs?
I think we know which way that falls.
But here's the clip in case you forgot.
Can lay down at this wall. And we're
gonna work with people so that if they
go out in a nice way, they go
back to their country, we're gonna work with
them right from the beginning on trying to
get them back in legally. Is that right?
A chance to come back. So it gives
you real incentive. Otherwise, they never come back.
They'll never be allowed once a certain period
of time goes by, which is probably gonna
be sixty days.
We're also gonna work with farmers that if
they have strong recommendations for their farms,
for certain people,
we're gonna let them stay in for a
while and work with the farmers and then
come back and go through a process, a
legal process. But, we have to take care
of our farmers and hotels and, you know,
various various places where they're usually where they
need the people.
Right. So just in case you forget, illegal
aliens. That's that's not watch the full thing
if you need more context. That's what they're
discussing.
And it's that's what they're talking about. Because
the whole thing is about letting them leave
and come back and say, well, if they
get a letter from the farmer, and I'm
sure that doesn't mean any farmer or any
hotel or any golf course. Right? But they
can say, well, they're they're the good illegal
aliens, and we'll let them stay while we
process this out.
Okay.
So if you're gonna make a big lion's
sand about the ones that allow it,
maybe the CEO of the country might matter
or in any of his businesses that still
allow that, the people like DC Drano wouldn't
even care. They're hypocrites.
They simply make the case to make a
personal immigration
racist argument, and that is how a lot
of people view the world. It matters if
it's a certain kind, and that's where like,
it's just incredible to me that people can
be so blind. But, again, my point is,
I don't think he's missing this. I think
he just is needing to he's playing the
game like his Epstein binder.
And, we're gonna be working with you very
carefully on that. So a farmer will come
in with a letter
concerning certain people saying they're great. They're working
hard. Yeah. We're gonna Or or just a
farmer who needs the workers, so he'll say
that, so they'll say it's okay.
Or, you know,
this Mar a Lago discussions or any number
of other people in his immediate circle who
say they need him because that's been the
biggest issue. A lot of people on his
side have been like, you're gonna destroy my
business, and so they make allowances. That's how
this works, left and right, always.
The point though is that all of this
is not really about the immigration. It's about
using that case to justify the immigration
focus. So Palantir can start
real time monitoring, in quotes,
all of the immigrants
or really who they say they're focusing on
and just watching all of you because you
realize there's no other way you can do
that. They're watching everybody. Slow it down a
little bit for them, and then we're gonna
ultimately bring them back. They'll go out. They're
gonna come back.
Right. Okay. So
one more point before we get into all
of it, which is the overlapping discussion of
a foreign influence. Very briefly, because I had
not point this out. So first, I just
wanna in case you didn't miss you missed
this, two days ago, a US government employee
was arrested for attempting to provide classified information
to a foreign government. I find it really
conspicuous that they just refused to mention what
government that was. They make it clear that
it was an ally.
Have you ever seen an example like this
where that was not the first thing they
pointed to? Can you imagine if this was
any other government they didn't like?
Did I mean, are we gonna pretend that
if it was Iran, they wouldn't be Iran,
Iran, Iran?
I mean, you I mean, that doesn't have
to mean that it's Israel, but worth considering.
But so what's interesting is the fact that
this is just a point I wanna make
about a general sense or whether it is,
Mendez in Egypt, which, by the way, is
the stick conversation.
But any other government, whether it's even The
UK or China, the point is this should
matter to us. The fact that it is
happening is just something to establish as fact.
There are people in the government that will
work with foreign countries to their benefit at
your expense. So the fact that we can't
seem to piece that together or allow that
to be seen when it comes to Israel
is just crazy to me. But keeping this
in mind, I wanna play you a few
things because I'm not gonna go in very
deep or really get all after this through
the conversation because I just want you to
see how as it pertains to this country.
But you need to understand how Israel is
playing a role in what they're building, in
the technocratic
globalist new world order dynamic that's being rolled
out in front of us, and they're playing
a central role even with the health side
of it, with Pfizer and everything else. So
keeping that in mind, first, just to highlight
this, and we're gonna come back to this
in the next show. Muhammad Shehana points out,
and this is a very well done thread
that is pretty impossible to deny, conclusive evidence
of Israel running the very criminal gangs looting
aid in Gaza.
Just an additional point, not relevant, not much
today, other than the fact that they're right
now using AI and facial scans and biometric
to basically dictate whether people can get aid
in Gaza. So it all comes together. But
just so you didn't miss that, that is
a reality that we've been saying for the
entire time. They're the ones arming and dictating
these gangs they use to justify, just like
they founded Hamas in the same exact way.
But the point is Israel,
in that same way, influences whatever they can,
however they can at the expense of everybody.
Here's an old clip from the former head
of Mossad telling you, admitting that Israel plans
for the Americans to die
for their wars.
Again, was the point.
So think about that in the context of
what's coming and what they're doing and ongoing
genocide,
the possible Iran discussion, or any other number
of things, and whether they would
overtake something or take advantage of it or,
you know, occupy a foreign government and turn
it into something like we're dealing with today.
All worth considering.
So, Leslie, there has been a lot of
speculation about whether Israel would go it alone,
would attack Iran all on its own. What
does mayor DeGan say about that?
Well, he he thinks it's a mistake
generally to make it an Israeli Iranian issue.
It should be an international issue. Somehow, the
Saudis should be encouraged to speak up and
pressure The United States,
and what he really would like to happen
is Israel sits back
and the Americans
do it for the Israelis.
It's it's it would then be internationalized.
He knows that Israel will be attacked, whoever
does it, but they'll be attacked less.
And what he's most worried about is the
retaliation.
And that's just casual conversation on corporate media
going back, you know, decade. The point is
that this has been roundly shown with their
own leaks that they laugh about how easy
it is to influence the US government
using the partisanship. That's not my opinion. That's
what they've said many times over yet. We
still can't get past that in this country.
So as Simon Gudnick points out, I don't
care what party they're in. If they protect
Epstein's child abusers
or help bury the blackmail, they're complicit.
No. That could be about Israel or The
United States. I won't bite my tongue just
because the cover up crew is now made
up of beloved MAGA politicians.
F them all. Loyalty doesn't excuse corruption. Right?
The the point here, be more like Simon.
Recognize that it's ridiculous to not to take
partisan sides. Team sport politics
is just kindergarten level. Now one more point
if you wanna see the kind of fake
discussion we're having, you know, a kind of
person that would flow you know, flaunt the
idea of American made anything and then find
out that that's in a Thailand made suit.
Things like that. It's a fake person. That's
everywhere. And these are really Zionist when you
break it down, so it should make you
wonder whether or not the whole fake push
is actually being put forward by something else.
And then lastly,
Google
v o three and the and the and
the flow. It says, the future of AI
filmmaking is here. We talked about that. And
he goes weird. Couple days later, FBI will
soon release video that proves Epstein was not
murdered.
Just AI overlap where it's going, deepfakes. We'll
see how that plays out. And our interview
I have with Charlie Robinson about all of
that, Epstein, Bongino, and the embarrassing nature of
all of that. So let's get to the
folk the the crux of the point. So
now Elon Musk,
back into Biden's administration,
clearly was role was working on the same
dynamic, whether he knew it or not, which
I think he does did, which is the
AI satellite network. Now it's not just spying.
Star Starlink, if you remember the actual image
down here, is insane to watch. To watch
how fastly they'll do it really quickly. This
is October 19. You jump forward all the
way to right now. That's the reality now.
That's November 2023. It's probably worse now. Those
like, majority of those are Starlink satellites.
The amount of control that gives somebody is
shocking, staggering. I don't even know if we
fully fathom what it means. So
under Biden
so apparently, he was a deep state pedophile
contractor until he suddenly wasn't anymore, however you
wanna pretend that works out. The point is
for the US government, Elon Musk was a
contractor under Biden, and then he continued under
Donald Trump because it's just one government, guys.
And it's it it was entitled, You Can't
Hide. As the National Reconnaissance Office points out
that they're building this,
now you can't hide because you're constantly being
looked at. Now, how do you think they
can do that without AI? They can't. And
his point in this discussion is that Elon
Musk was helping him build out the AI
that would make this all work. Okay. Jump
forward.
Musk is now fleeing the Trump administration as
twenty, twenty first century wire writes
after Doge failure, white genocide hoax, x meltdown.
That's how they're framing it. I agree in
an interesting way. Now there are two ways
to look at this. Either he
is inconvenient for the establishment or the agenda
because he just failed at what he was
doing and he made it too hated, bombastic.
I don't know. And so they're pushing him
away because the agenda has to succeed. Or
maybe he was the rat the the maybe
this was the way it was supposed to
go. So Elon Musk rolls out this ridiculous
version. Right? And then they push him aside
and go, hey. No. He's out of the
way. Now we're gonna do it a little
bit less Musk style, and people accept it.
Worth considering. But now it is interesting to
highlight that he has now sort of pulled
away, at least on the surface. This was
May 28. Musk says Trump's big bill undermines
Doge.
I don't know. To me, that felt a
little bit fake.
I I just seemed like it seemed like
a really strange thing to say unless there
really is a little bit of a feud
between them, which you can decide. That's not
even the point today. But he said that.
You're undermining what I did even though he
really didn't do that much if you understand
the true narrative, not the things they're screaming
about. Judge spares Trump, this is on the
twenty eighth,
spares Trump from massive dumbest lawsuit, leaving Elon
Musk holding the bag for the unauthorized
role. That's pretty interesting, and we'll go into
this more as we go in the in
the future shows. But he says Donald Trump
has been dropped from a lawsuit. So Trump
has been
overlooked,
accused his administration of illegally wielding power to
slash government agencies and and purge the federal
workforce.
But a federal judge won't let Elon Musk
escape.
So is he supposed to be the the
scapegoat? Was he used all along? I mean,
these are all interesting thoughts. Let's not forget
that Elon Musk, a lot of people argue
he was just sort of a puppet, that
he's not even really running these companies, that
he's sort of a stand in. Maybe he
was meant to be the scapegoat.
I don't think so. That's not what rings
true for me, but weird to see how
this has been developing. And now beyond that,
this is the twenty eighth as well. Musk's
role leading Doge qualifies as continuing and permanent.
So the judge ultimately rules that because of
the way this was set up, you can't
just be like, I'm done now because there's
no official anything.
There's not a there was no real confirmation.
There was nothing. Right? So they just said
it's an advisory role. So for him just
to step aside, they're going, well, that's not
how that works. You're still technically there as
a person. You still have his ear. You're
still influential. So that never stopped. There's no
official beginning. There's no official end. It's an
interesting point. And so they're simply saying that
you have influence over it still. And I
think he does. And what they're saying, though,
is that that means he's still liable for
whatever lawsuits may come, and that's where that
builds into.
Now it simply says the judge in the
federal court found that Musk's reach extends throughout
the executive branch without any known limits. That's
pretty obvious if you're not if you're being
objective. Even though the White House had tried
to minimize his role framing framing him as
a mere adviser without formal authority.
She wrote that the 14 states made a
credible argument. There's 14 states that are suing
them that the tech billionaire and Trump mega
donor now occupies a continuing position and exercises
significant authority all without proper appointment. I mean,
it's kinda hard to deny.
All of that is interesting to see how
this may build. Now
a judge says Musk may face lawsuit over
his role.
And then as of twenty ninth, Musk officially
leaves the administration. At least that's what they're
stating. Again, since there's no official confirmation, it's
just words. And it says White House officially
confirms.
Oh, wait. Was that yeah. It doesn't matter.
I think there's only one thing in there.
And then this is just an interesting addition.
I don't know if you saw these. This
this only adds to whether or not you
think that he may be just a stand
in. Maybe he was meant. Maybe this is
all meant to give you a certain impression.
But I do find this pretty strange. As
Elon Musk recently was caught on video yet
again, I think in the White House as
of yesterday or today, doing one of these.
It's a very sad case. It's a case
we win. We can't lose that case. Because
we have the right to make grants. We're
not gonna make any grants like that.
But,
I don't think Harvard's been acting very nicely.
I think Columbia wants to get to the
bottom of the problem. They've acted very well.
And there are other institutions too. They're acting,
but Harvard's trying to be
a big shot. And all that happens is
every
three days, we find another hundred.
And now he's got a black eye, which,
you know, who knows? Stories where his kid
gave it to him or whatever. I mean,
you know, unless there's more evidence, it doesn't
it's all assumption. The point though is that
he's doing that weird thing when then here's
the one from before.
So that this one makes that one much
more relevant because you could argue the first
one was his back or something. I mean,
frankly, these are minor points that don't even
really mean that much other than to wonder
whether this guy is on drugs and whether
that would be
some kind of whether that would imply
something, you know, that he's not as serious
as he thought or maybe wasn't really making
decisions. Either way, he's been publicly stating he
takes ketamine and ecstasy and all sorts of
things. But the other question somebody brought up,
which is why I really wanna include this.
Interestingly thought the thought being and this is
just, like, sake of conversation.
What if he is testing out his own
stuff? What if he's doing some what if
he's, like, Neuralink,
and he's, like,
real time grok in his head? It's just
like that's as much as that seems outlandish,
it's really not that crazy when you think
about where we are right now. Just worth
considering. So all that's to say, important notes
to, you know, keep in your mind as
the building continues, the conversation. So that the
the original push, and then we come over
to the overlap of Musk and AI before
the selection. Remember, just quickly, that DARPA
had an XAI program. It was literally called
XAI. K? That ended right before Musk took
over Twitter. Musk takes over Twitter.
That supposedly ends,
and he and he starts XAI. Okay? That's
that's the process. And we discussed that here,
the quiet transition from DARPA's XAI to Elon's
XAI. Then, of course, we have BlackRock putting
in billions into XAI, which should be a
big deal, but apparently it's not. And then
X
sold XAI.
Or that's all a bunch of narrative, and
it was always one military program. Right? I
mean, that's what a lot of us is
always worried. The point, though, is this overlaps
the Palantir as we're gonna get to, but
it's the building of this rationale and AI
basically being the central part of your social
media, you know, Twitter file. I mean, everything
they're rolling out. Everything.
And then, of course,
you have Musk x AI joining TWG
Global,
Palantir for AI push in financial sector. So
the question is, were they always in line?
And was this just the building of the
rationale for why they are on the same
page? It's worth considering. Either way e either
way you look at that, the point is
how centralized and connected this all becomes.
So starting with this in that in that
regard, this is from today.
Has Big Brother arrived?
Inside the secretive Trump effort to centralize government
data on millions of Americans. Remember, again, if
you're willing to dismiss the question
especially corporate media, especially mainstream alternative media, question
everything is the point. But that doesn't mean
blindly ignore because it's a side you don't
like. That's that is more ignorant than pretty
much anything else. There's so many people out
there that will go, oh, it's a partisan,
you know, the New York Times, CNN.
I I have the same reaction for Fox
News or Newsmax or anything else. They're all
partisan, ridiculous, but you still consider what they
have to say. So in this case, what
they're gonna highlight here for you is 100%
true. I can prove all of it. But
there are slants and considerations that they put,
and I think that's what you should be
worried about. But they also the point should
be want you should wonder why are they
pointing it out. That's it's not always simply
because it's left versus right. Frankly, that's almost
never the case as far as I can
tell. Look back through history. The point is,
do they want you looking at this or
not? And clearly, they're pointing to it. Right?
So then what is the conversation?
Are they is this supposed to be what
you react to so they roll out something
different? Right? Is this supposed to normalize you
with this or you know? Or is it
like, one thing I see happening a lot,
I think a lot of people right now,
even on the left side of this conversation,
are very resistant to just corporate media right
now because of all we've been through. So
when they come out and say, bad thing,
especially on the right, the response is, well,
then probably good because they're bad. It seems
pretty binary and
basic reverse psychology, but it does work. Now
it says the Trump administration is reported leaning
is reportedly leaning on an Elon Musk allied
tech company to build wide ranging data tools
Close that. Wide ranging data tools, pooling government
information
on millions of Americans and immigrants alike. The
campaign has raised alarms from critics that the
company could be furthering Musk's Doge effort to
vacuum up and and potentially weaponize
or sell
mass amounts of sensitive personal data. And And
they they mean the sell part will come
back to you. Don't forget. I mean, the
White House, as of May 14,
scraps plans to block data brokers from selling
your sensitive data. Not just your data, but
your sensitive data.
That's important, guys. That's a personal background, not
just what you looked at online, but your
personal sensitive information.
Why why was that not a gigantic story?
Why didn't the left come up up in
arms and go, Trump is doing it? Some
of them pointed to it, but it wasn't
really the left side of congress caring because
they're all the same thing,
all, in my opinion, generally in the same
direction, whether they even know it or not.
The people that are pulling their strings
are driving you in the same direction. But
continuing,
It says the campaign has raised alarms
that could be furthering that point,
selling sensitive data, mass amounts of sensitive personal
data, particularly against vulnerable groups, immigrants, political dissidents.
In March, the president signed an executive order
just dedicated to, quote, stopping waste, fraud, and
abuse by eliminating information silos. See how this
works? So they gave you the and that
is that's the efficiency movement. That's technocracy.
That's what this all roots back to. Derek's
been screaming this for a long time. The
point is they say, well, we wanna make
it more efficient for you.
So you think, oh, we're gonna fight deep
state and cut off the democrat spending, and
they come in and jam all your information
into one location. That's the silos were important
because they kept these things independent. There wasn't
one centralized choke point where they could just
get hacked and lose it all, and all
of your information will be gone. That's ridiculous.
And so the only reason they need to
do that is because they're
collecting it all, and they're they're not hiding
this, guys. They're using your personal information just
like Elon admitted to using XAI and Twitter
to train their AI models. They're using your
personal data. They're using everything, and that's the
data they need. They covet that over anything
because it's the final step for really or
they argue for fully training this these large
language model language models. So he's saying
that they're using all of that data. And
in March, they signed an executive order to
argue they did that to efficient make it
more efficient, but in doing so, jammed it,
eliminated the information silos that kept that from
being possible or from the hack from being
possible or rather the
much less likely. A euphemism for pulling vast
stores of data on Americans under the federal
government.
To what I mean, why do we think
the federal government has you know, this is
the the continual, like, call it mission creep
for government, where we shouldn't have a federal
government to begin with as far as I'm
concerned,
and rationalized
by military or foreign policy.
And every single day, they get one and
now it's just they everyone else is is
restricting the freedom of the executive power. It's
like this exact backward way we should be
thinking about this.
And it says, to carry out the data
effort, the administration has deepened the federal government's
long standing partnership with Palantir,
a tech firm specializing
in building big data applications. Now I was
recently I was speaking with a family member
before the show and pointing out, like, oh
my god. Look at all these contracts. The
the governments, it's incredible. You know? And the
point is, one, we've been talking about that
for a very long time. But also recognizing,
recently even, we did a show going through,
USA,
US spending.
And And remember this right in the beginning,
and we went through and showed you all
the Palantir contracts. We're going look at all
the and that was on top of the
older ones. The earlier ones that Trump's initiated
since taking power again,
and they were massive
hundred billion to hundred billion dollar contracts and
even more. And this point is to recognize
that this stuff needs to matter
before it becomes a partisan focal point. Right?
That's the biggest issue today as they seem
you know? And then the question becomes from
my perspective is,
once
it becomes a focal point of the partisan
game, is it already too late? Usually, that's
the case. So it just behooves everybody out
there to be caring about this, to look
at these things beyond a partisan lens. Otherwise,
they
use them against you.
It says a tech firm specializing in building
big data applications, which was cofounded by
JD Vance mentor
Peter Thiel.
So,
since Trump took office,
the administration
has reportedly spent more than a hundred and
$13,000,000
with Palantir through new and existing contracts.
And that's just since it took office again.
While the company is slated to begin work
on a new $795,000,000
deal,
almost a billion dollars, with the Defense Department.
That's on top of everything else, guys. This
I mean, we might as well be living
under a Palantir government. But this is the
we'll get to the worry
of that this might well be an AI
government kind of push test run. Maybe it's
already happening. You know, the ideas, again, is
these things should not be scoffed off like
that. It's crazy. I mean, we have to
be real about where we are and how
many things that were moments ago ridiculous are
suddenly now, like, literally
wrapped around you, like, in your pocket. Like,
it's happening in front of us to the
degree that we didn't even know it was
there. Like, it's always like that. So whether
or not this might already be happening is
usually how this goes in the past. And
so worrying about whether this like, my point
was whether Doge itself was literally
the run of some kind of AI government.
Now it says the department Palantir is reportedly
working with the administration and the Pentagon, the
Department of Homeland Security,
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement,
and the IRS.
It's more than that, by the way, but
it's already built on the surface, or under
that is more. On the surface, they're already
building more elements of that. But just that
alone.
Think about a tech company that is literally
helping commit a genocide right now who is
was basically immersed in the Pentagon, the Homeland
Security Department,
ICE, and IRS. Guys, they could do anything
with that information.
Information
is power. It has been for a long
time. And that
is more important than anything else in the
world, and they have all of it.
With the within these agencies, the firm is
reportedly building tools to track the movement of
migrants in real time and streamline all tax
data.
Now, in real time, we that means if
they're tracking migrants in real time, that means
they're tracking everybody.
How do they know who are migrants?
And this is what we told you. This
is the COVID nineteen
pharmacovigilance
narrative
oracle, which is now being used for Stargate.
It's all just this building surveillance network under
a new guys, whatever moment they need to
use.
The company is also reportedly in talks about
deploying
its technology at the Social Security Administration and
the Department of Education, both of which have
been targets of Doge. So you can't miss
that overlap, guys. Like, these are the same
things. So Doge is Doge was a mirage
meant to rationalize what we're doing here or
what they're doing. That's I think that's pretty
clear at this point. And which sort which
stores sensitive information
about America's identities and finances.
Right? Now even when I say mirage, realize
that's not there were actions taking place. The
point is it wasn't ever ever about reducing
spending. Frankly, we can see we're spending more,
and that's unless you're trying to you know,
the point is if you're gonna now go,
well, it's because of x, y, and z.
Fine. Fine. The point was never about that
I knew why or it wouldn't why it
would or wouldn't happen is that argue. I
didn't know for sure, but that that wasn't
gonna be the path because governments wanna continue
spending, and here we are.
But you gobbled up whatever narrative they spun
and, you know, and went along with every
step, and now you're arguing why more spending
is okay. Well, now we're on the same
page, but except we're somehow wrong. You know,
it's it's the it's the partisanship that eats
logic, guys. It's everywhere.
Now he goes on to say, the Trump
administration has reportedly pursued a variety of efforts
to use big data to support its priorities,
including social media surveillance of immigrants to detect
alleged pro terror views. Now, apparently, as we'll
get into probably tomorrow, the next show, they're
they're refusing visas for people because they don't
have social media accounts, which which, again, I'll
be the first to say that they they're
not required to give visas to anybody as
far as I can tell. Maybe that maybe
I'm wrong on that. But the point
is, it it's it's not that's not why
they're doing that.
The idea of of you know, it's all
about surveillance and invasive control, and that's just
one of the reasons. Like, we can see
with the with the MAGA guy currently in
prison.
But it goes on to say, including Social
Security surveillance,
or this is an American activist who disagree
with Donald Trump's views, which is happening.
Earlier this month, a group of former Palantir
employees
warned in an open letter that the company
was normalizing authoritarianism
under the guise of a revolution led by
oligarchs.
We talked about that. Their own employees are
literally going. They're pretending that they're on your
side. They're pretending they're libertarian, so you all
fall for it, and they're rolling out authoritarianism.
It's I mean, it's just insane how clear
it's always been, and it's it's partisanship that
has let this happen. Quote, they are trying
to amass a huge amount of data. According
to a senior DHS official speaking to the
magazine, quote, it has nothing to do with
it was Wired they're speaking with. It has
nothing to do with finding fraud or wasteful
spending. They are already cross referencing immigration with
Social Security Administration and IRS as well as
voter data. It's just I can't believe where
anybody's allowed this to happen. Since Trump took
office, Doge operatives,
many of whom are unknown to the public
nor have been vetted,
which is also crazy, have rapidly sought access
to data at key agencies, including Department of
Education and the Treasury, as well as Social
Security Administration,
often over the objections of senior staff. Now
let's not forget the Israel influence, guys. For
all we know, this literally is Israel or
a foreign government. Whatever makes you make sense
for you, the possibility that is. And I'll
include, even though I wasn't going to,
the point that needs to constantly be made
around this. It's all all these people we're
discussing who have access to all these things,
many of which never signed ethics pledges that
whether about conflicts of interest or really ethics
showing you who they might be attached to
or maybe, as the person said, maybe foreign
governments are working through them right now because
they never did that.
And nobody ever called it out. Not not
in earnest,
anyway.
Did I read that last part? Let me
see. Oh, no. I went too far. Where
were we?
So right here, it says they are trying
to amass huge amounts of data. Since Trump
took office, Doge operatives, many of whom are
unknown. I I did read that. Okay. Making
sure we're done. So that that this is
just the first part from Independent. But so
the idea simply is that you can very
clearly see what's being amass. Like, they're rolling
this out. They're building this in front of
you. So I wanna I want people to
think about the larger picture, at least from
the AI perspective, because that's central. I mean,
if we if there's one thing we can
all see, whether it's health, foreign policy, AI
is the thing right now. It's everywhere, which
they've been telling you. And so wondering
whether about when it's coming or if it's
already happened. The impending future of AI government.
Not governance, but government. Like, actually having some
kind of a central I artificial intelligence that's
dictating policy and and guiding people if not
controlling.
But the point is, but who controls the
AI? Maybe nobody. Maybe Israel. Maybe China. Maybe
The United States. The point is who? And
that's the biggest issue because,
one, if it is AI, like, an an
actual general intelligence, well, that would be something
different seeing as how that would be they've
sent you into whatever's possible if you believe
that's even possible. On the other side of
it, it would be the lie.
Claiming there's an AI running things when really
it's them pulling the strings. And either way,
very concerning.
So keeping this in mind, let's overlap this
with the point about the
possibility of this. As we said before, this
this is an article from February 25. Who
is Amy Gleason?
This person the person named Doge as acting
administrator by the White House. Very this weird
overlap that I've I mean, I
I would still like more information about this,
whether this person even exists. And if she
does, what is she involved in? What is
she doing? If she's supposed to be the
administrator of Doge, show me one example where
she had any say, influence, wrote, signed anything.
I don't think it happened. So it does
it's really weird. Right? So maybe it could
be a cover for Elon Musk. That's certainly
possible.
Now David I pointed this out. This is
on May 13 pointing to this article. Trump
fires head of US copyright office stoking fears
about deregulation
of AI. May 13. So, again, my mindset
is the Palantir database has been building this
entire time, but pointing out is it builds
up to this point to where it's officially
sort of acknowledged. Right? So May 13 before
that. David Ickels, are you getting it yet?
It's an AI coup. Head of US copyright
office, Shira Perlmutter,
fired by Trump after simply reporting
or after report questioning Musk and the AI
cabal, getting access for free to copyrighted material
to train their AI.
Two days earlier, the White House fired librarian
of congress, Carla Hayden, the official responsible for
overseeing the copyright office
and who appointed Perlmutter Perlmutter.
Quote, it says, it's no coincidence
that Trump acted less than a day after
Perlmutter refused to rubber stamp Elon Musk's efforts
to mine troves of copyrighted work to train
AI models.
You see, not hypothetically, but that's what they
were doing.
They they were trying to access the information
that was not theirs to train their models,
and they said, you're not supposed to do
that, and they fired them.
So if you can't recognize that that's everywhere,
that they're they're just
freely accessing everything that's supposed to be private.
I mean, it's everywhere you look. Then he
says, fears, fears, it's happening before our eyes
as the cult AI control system goes into
overdrive under Trump. As he says, he's long
said it would. He's right.
So seven c's pointed this out, and this
this is an important part of this. Let's
not forget that this happened right before this
acknowledgment.
Republicans introduced a budget reconciliation bill that gives
AI powers to Howard Lutnick
and prohibits states from regulating AI for a
decade.
You already know this. He does a really
great thread in this if you wanna go
through it in-depth. I'm just gonna show you
some of the parts of the bill itself.
This is the bill. I've down I I
oh, wait. I thought I did. Oh, I
guess I forgot to download this one. I
did the other one. I usually put them
on my server, so if they get deleted,
you guys can still save it. I'll try
to remember to do that.
But so this is the bill. You can
read through it. Here's a couple parts that
stand out to me.
Except
as provided in paragraph two,
no state or political subvert here, let's do
this.
So you can see it in real time
just in case. Except as provided in paragraph
two, no state or political sub subdivision thereof
may enforce any law
or regulation
regulating artificial intelligence models. Like, again, I I'm
actually
I I said this with Charlie Robinson. I
can't believe
anybody let this happen unless you recognize that
they're all absolutely on the same page. No
regulation
of any company working with AI for ten
years?
I mean, that's that's I can't for any
topic, that seems insane. Yet, let alone what
is supposed to completely revolutionize, if not destroy,
our entire lifestyle, our world,
our freedom, our privacy. Who knows? Our liberty,
especially with what we can see with Palantir
or whatever else we're dealing with. Are any
of them people we want having that much
control? Oracle, Larry Ellison,
Chad GPT, Sam Altman, x a I, Elon
Musk, the US government,
Palantir, Israel. I mean, for crying out loud,
I just I just I just can't wrap
my mind around how that's possible unless everybody.
Everybody's on the same
page. May said no political subdivision thereof may
enforce any law or regulation
regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems,
or automated
decision systems.
So AI, that's what you it says in
here. AI basically dictating decisions. That's what it
says.
And that's during a ten year period
after this date after this act. That's now,
basically. So, that's weirdly how interesting how now
suddenly they're going, Palantir
database. Well, too late now, apparently. Can't regulate
it. Goes on to say,
paragraph one may not be construed to prohibit
the enforcement of any law regulation that the
primary purpose and effect of which is to
remove legal impediments to or facilitate
the development or operation of an artificial intelligence
model,
artificial intelligence system, or automated decision system.
The primary purpose and effect of which is
to streamline licensing, permitting,
routing, routing, zoning, procurement,
or reporting procedures in a manner that facilitates
the adoption of artificial intelligence models, artificial system
intelligent systems, or automated decision systems, and does
not impose
any substantive
design performance, data handling, documentation, civil liability, taxation
fee, or other requirement on intelligence artificial intelligence
models or the systems or the automated
so you can't do anything. Like, as the
guy pointed out in a recent video,
feels very similar to the vaccine act. Right?
And now they're using AI to make vaccines.
So it might as well just be that.
I mean, they maybe it's all it is.
I don't I doubt it. But if that
makes it make more sense to you, they're
just extending out the same game, or they
can do whatever they want with these injections,
and there's nobody can be held accountable.
And then this
one. To replace and this this says this
repeatedly about a lot of different things. To
replace or modernize
within the Department of Commerce,
legacy business systems with state of the art
commercial artificial intelligence systems and automated decision systems.
The secretary of commerce shall use the funds
appropriate
for the following.
I mean, they're not even hiding this, guys.
They're literally automating governmental
departments. So what what what if that's I
mean, how do you not see that eventually
going into all of it? Or maybe that's
already the case, and these are simply the
extension of that.
So either way you think about this, the
idea that you can say within ten years,
there's no oversight as you roll out government
AI?
I mean, this is just insane. This might
you guys are literally gonna I mean, I
I can make jokes about this, you know,
Skynet or whatever. I just like you every
possible worst thing is in this next time
ten year period because they just I mean,
I don't even know how to frame this
without being hyperbolic.
You know what? You know why? You know
why it's the the reason I'm
see,
failing for words?
Because it's endless.
The amount of possibilities, the amount of ways
this could go insane, it could go wrong,
could destroy. It's endless.
Us I mean, with oversight. Well, let alone
with no oversight from anybody with the most
powerful technocrats, billionaires, and genociders
running an AI control system for the next
ten years with no oversight.
I don't know how that makes sense to
anybody.
Now let's not forget,
actually, it was April. April something. I forget.
Oh, April 8.
Weirdly enough, Marjorie Taylor Greene
decided to buy Palantir stock. Now maybe it
means nothing. Maybe she just decided we got
lucky because she saw what was built. And
let's be clear, everybody saw this was building,
but the timing does seem interesting and a
lot of not a lot of those did
did the same. Now I just quickly looked
and it turns out that shock, surprise, surprise,
James Comer purp purchased Palantir stock in January.
Gilbert Wray did the same, and then Marjorie
Taylor Greene. Democrats and Republicans, which I do
think is relevant.
So here's the New York Times article continuing
off from the same conversation from The Independent.
This was yesterday. In March, president Trump signed
an executive order calling for the federal government
to share data across agencies, raising questions over
whether he might compile a master list of
personal information, clearly, that's happening, on Americans that
could give him untold surveillance power.
Mister Trump has not publicly talked about the
effort since. But behind the scenes, officials have
quietly put technology building blocks into place to
enable his plan. In particular, they have turned
to one company,
Palantir,
the data analyst and technology firm. The Trump
administration has expanded Palantir's work across the federal
government in recent months. The company has received,
as you as we just reported, more than
a hundred and 13 million dollars in federal
contract spending since he took office according to
public records, including additional funds from existing contracts
as well as new contracts with the Department
of Homeland Security and the Pentagon.
There's in parenthesis, this does not include the
so in addition to that, another $795,000,000
contract with the Department of Defense was report
was awarded just last week. You know? So
as we're talking about slashing spending, here's a
casual billion dollars for what most of us
don't want.
The push has key the push has put
a key Palantir product, and this is where
I find this first relevant part. You know,
every part of this is relevant and concerning
to me. But the this whole push has
put a key Palantir project called Foundry
into at least
four federal agencies.
So that's not even mentioned in most of
these articles.
Foundry being the thing that is being centralized
into all of these, if not the centralization
in all of it,
including Department of Homeland Security, Health and Human
Services,
widely adopting Foundry,
which organizes and analyzes data, paves the way
for mister Trump to easily merge information from
different agencies,
the government official said.
Creating detailed portraits of Americans based on government
data
is not just a pipe dream, they write.
The Trump administration has already sought access to
hundreds of data points on citizens
and others through government databases,
including their bank account numbers,
the amount of their student debt, their medical
claims, and any disability status. Now you realize
this is this is more detailed. This is
not just we're scooping this together to, you
know, find immigrants.
The government is actively finding they're looking it's
it's like the war on terror, and they
said we're gonna be focusing on back. No.
They turned that in and looked right at
you. They looked right at us. It was
always pointed at us. We have always been
their their their biggest worry. And so right
now, what we're seeing is that they're claiming
all this stuff, and they're they're scooping up
data on you because it's always been the
case. It's not Trump.
It's your government. He's just the newest example.
Palantir's selection as a chief vendor for the
project was driven by Elon Musk's department of
government efficiency
according to government officials. That's super important. So
the reason Palantir was brought in for this
is because DOGE and Musk drove that into
reality. No. At least that's what's being framed.
So if back to the point of whether
Musk might be the scapegoat, that may be
the the reason, you know, the thread they
lay so he gets pointed to. But I
I my gut tells me that this was
all laid in a place very carefully. I
can't help but consider the Israeli influence on
this, and maybe that's why this is all
placed there as every one of these people
are
screaming Zionists. They're blindly
anti American when you really look at what
they're doing. But it says,
at least three Doge members formerly worked at
Palantir.
And that's I mean, look at the list
of people in his cabinet that worked for
Palantir or associated with Peter Thiel. We showed
you in the beginning of the show. It's
mind boggling. Actually, there's a tweet we're gonna
show you that has even more, I think.
Where was that?
We'll come back to it.
I think it's further down. It's it's actually
wild to see how many people. But
at least three of Doge members worked for
Palantir, while two others had worked at companies
funded by Peter Thiel. That's how do you
that's not I mean, even mathematically, that seems
unlikely, but it says an investor and founder
of Palantir.
This month,
13 former employees,
and we'll show you this next, signed a
letter urging Palantir to stop its endeavors with
Donald Trump. Linda
Zia, a a a somebody who signed who
was a Palantir engineer until last year, said
the problem was not with the company's technology,
but with how the Trump administration intended to
use it. Now that's a philosophical difference or
really just a, you know, I it's both,
in my opinion. The technology itself is is
designed in a way that seems weaponized.
But it says data that is collected for
one reason should not be repurposed for other
uses.
Combining all that data, even with the noblest
of intentions,
significantly increases the risk of misuse. Well, that's
obvious. So even if you wanna pretend like
they're doing this for the right reasons, that's
the point that we've always been making is
regardless, you shouldn't be doing that. It's it
is guaranteed to be abused, whether it's him
or the next person.
Palantir, of course, declined to comment, which never
seems always seems suspicious to me with something
like this when they're acting like they're doing
good for everybody, and they're like, no comment.
Or the White House, no comment.
It seems very strange to me.
I mean, why wouldn't they come out and
be like, yeah. It's great. We're saving everybody.
You know? It seems very weird. But it
goes on to say, Palantir has long worked
with the federal government. Its government contracts span
the defense department, the Center for Disease Control
and Prevention. See, I mean, it's everywhere. During
the pandemic, the illusion they're in, the Biden
administration signed a contract with Palantir to manage
the distribution of vaccines through the CDC.
So okay. So does that make Palantir a
pedophile deep state per you know, the gay
look.
I'm not trying to diminish the reality of
those very things in the government. The problem
is that partisanship seems to allot them to
one side and only selectively.
It's not the case. My point is if
you're gonna act like this is some deep
state thing, then why did Palantir work with
the deep state, and why does Trump work
with them now? It's all of your government,
guys. And the point is that they're working
with the government. Nothing has changed. And it
goes on to say, at the IRS, Palantir
engineers joined in April to use Foundry
to organize data gathered on American taxpayers.
Two government officials said this. Their work began
as a way to create a single searchable
database for the IRS, but has since expanded.
They said Palantir is in talks for a
permanent contract with the IRS,
Department of Homeland
Security, the, you know, state department,
CDC,
IRS,
ICE. I mean, what what are we missing
here, guys? I mean, this seems to be
every major database in this well, guess what?
That's the point.
It says $30,000,000
contract that I signed with Palantir in April
to build a platform to track migrant movements
in real time. Same point. The only way
that's possible is if they're tracking everybody and
then doing their best to differentiate,
or maybe
not. Goes on to say the goal of
uniting data on Americans
has been quietly discussed by Palantir engineers, employees
said, adding that they were worried about collecting
so much sensitive information in one place.
That's always been the logic, guys. Maybe that's
why they're doing it so somebody outside of
this has easy access to everything they want.
The company's security practices are only as good
as the people using them, they said. They
characterized some Doge employees as sloppy on security,
which has has not followed protocols
in how personal devices were used. We know
that. That's been proven, in fact. They've even
had hacks since they started doing this. And
this is the employees from Palantir saying this.
So you have to ask, why would they
be that sloppy? Was that in the interest
of hurting this country or because they wanted
somebody else to have access or something else?
Please ask these questions, guys, because I'm not
trying to focus on one thing. That that's
what makes most sense to me. But we
don't know for sure. But we have to
ask these questions because that doesn't add up.
So going over some of these points,
here
is Foundry, is what Grak had to say.
Is Israel involved with Palantir's Foundry project? And
we've talked about this in the past. Israel
was involved with foundry. While specific details about
the use of foundry in Israel are unlimited,
Palantir has confirmed its use in the region,
foundry in particular,
with a dedicated foundry access link based in
Israel under the code name ether. This suggests
that the Israeli entities, potentially including government or
military operations, are utilizing the foundry platform for
data integration and analysis.
And source material here, we've talked about this
in the past. The reality is this is
important to understand the overlap between the two,
including to this extent of using their AI
to kill people in Gaza.
A strategic partnership. We've seen Lavender,
Habsora.
They're you know, these are real time
AI killing machines.
Now the dispute,
for for example, with Lavender,
is whether or not that's actually Palantir. Now
the point is to understand.
I believe this is exactly what we're talking
about. Regardless,
the point is Palantir's working with Israel in
this exact regard using their AI for battle
tech. So it's kind of ridiculous to pretend
like that's not what that is. But even
if it's not, they're helping them build that
out then because they're helping them build this
exact thing out. It's just pretty obvious. So
and that was January 2024.
This is the entity that's collecting all of
the information on you, and we know that
Israel has weaponized this information for decades, and
they're using it against people right this moment,
including Americans.
So doesn't that concern
people in the MAGA movement? It should.
So next point,
WikiLeaks, as we read in the article,
the open letter released by 13 former Palantir
employees is damning.
Not for anything it says, but for everything
it doesn't.
And the way they title this page, though,
they're using the the nod to the Palantir,
which is from the Lord of the Rings
series,
The Scouring of the Shire, a letter from
concerned Palantir alumni to tech workers of Silicon
Valley.
And here's the address on my website in
case this goes away. And you can read
this for yourself. I mean, the bottom line
is that it's highlighting what we just went
through.
The use of this data for personal resource
for, you know, at at the expense of
the people's data. Like, this is not what
the these people are calling out the use
of this tech in the ways that they
always thought this company was not allowing or
not allowed to do or that they had
principles that they maintain. That's something the biggest
point is they go, you know, we're not
actually, like she said, it's not about whether
the which I disagree with. The data is,
you know, basically used in a noble way.
It's okay. But the way they're using it
is wrong. Like, I don't think this centralized
data collection should exist at all. The point
is that what these people are saying who
are part of Palantir are that what they're
doing today
under Trump's administration
is wrong, and it is dangerous.
It's important to understand that they were the
they're involved. And, also, it's also interesting that
back on April 17,
this video came out from More Perfect Union.
I worked at Palantir, it says. The tech
company is reshaping reality.
That's what it says.
Even in this it it's
everywhere you look that people inside of it,
people in the government who are resigning in
protest or, you know, whatever the conversation, it's
everywhere. What we're telling you is is the
writings on the wall. It's right in front
of us. This should not be something we're
okay with.
Hackable animal points this out. Fannie Mae. You
know? And my point my point is this
is in every angle of our lives right
now, this is because it's taking over. And
I don't mean you that could mean in
a real sense or it could mean that
they're just employing this or deploying it everywhere.
But that's Fannie Mae announced a new AI
partnership
with Palantir
to help root out mortgage fraud or just
more access to more data is really what
I think it is.
And as Hackable Animal says, CIA Palantir is
being injected into everything, both public and private.
If you want to understand what they are
building, you need to study Technocracy
Inc, enter tech energy certificate, and the technical
alliances
energy survey. They are the basis for the
CBDC and social credit system.
And, again, we'll reference Derek's amazing work on
basically entitled welcome to the Palantir World Order.
April 24.
Now Ian Smith called this out. Now if
I remember correctly, he was pro he was
a Trump supporter and then kind of, you
know, disillusioned by what's going on because he
has principles, it seems. He says Donald Trump
just handed Palantir the contract
to build the federal AI database,
which will be the single most dangerous consolidation
of power in modern American history. Completely agree,
if not already. Palantir isn't a tech company.
It's a surveillance machine born inside the CIA,
funded through In Q Tel, and run by
Peter Thiel, a billionaire data oligarch who openly
brags about crushing right wing populist movements in
Europe with his software.
Now he's here building the backbone of American
AI, pretending to be a libertarian because that,
you know, worked with some people.
This is the same Peter Thiel who groomed
JD Vance,
shapes national AI policy maker,
shapes national AI policy maker as an unelected
power broker, pretends to be anti woke while
embedding volunteer across every global intelligence agency, and
Trump,
the guy who ran on the drain in
the swamp, just handed him the keys. You
are watching a merger of big tech, big
government, and artificial intelligence branded as patriotism.
You know? And so the point with that
is is it the it's maybe it was
under under the our idea during Biden is
somehow woke or before that about fighting terrorism
or you know, it's whatever the narrative is,
whatever they get you most passionately
focused on. In this case,
the fighting the deep state as patriots pushing
back against the control structure and using that
to to convince you that you fighting the
system is happening as opposed to you building
it out for them.
They're not creating tools, he writes. They're building
infrastructure for digital authoritarianism.
Palantir has already been used for pre crime
arrests and pay as Whitney's covered, and pandemic
lockdown enforcement. You you'd think that would be
enough for, specifically, the Republicans.
And now it's being given access to national
databases under the flag of security.
This isn't the Patriot Act two point o.
This is Revelation 13 in real time.
I mean, you could argue Patriot Act two
point o. His point is that it's much,
much bigger than that.
He he causes all to receive a mark.
No man might buy or sell save he
that had the mark, the mark of the
beast, the point. Now whenever you think about
the overlap to that, the point I always
make from an Israeli perspective end times is
whether they believe that. It's important to think
about, and they're very clearly pointing. I mean,
people like,
Basant or or Waltz or or any number.
I mean, most of his cabinet are
religious Zionists.
Like, whether Christian or Jewish, biblical Zionists. Like,
they think end times is here, and that's
what's coming. And by the way, that means
to destroy the West, so that comes on.
That's the belief. So people that are in
Trump's administration screaming America First are of the
mind that this has to be destroyed before
that can become. Think about that. It says
and it says, an AI is assigning you
a risk score.
What then it said, well, first, you said,
you think the mark will look like a
chip? It'll look like this. The AI is
signing you a risk score, a predictive model
determining your access to banking, travel, medicine, a
tech priesthood deciding who's dangerous,
and Trump is funding it. Palantir is the
digital b system. Thiel is the architect, and
conservatives are sleepwalking into their own captivity, cheering
as their anti establishment hero turns the surveillance
state into machine learning monster. This isn't freedom.
It's a Babylon binary.
Interesting. I think that'll reach people. I hope
it does. James Lee simply says, interesting how
the same company tracking terrorists
abroad
is now tracking us at home,
starting to feel like they are the enemy.
Now, obviously, he's been aware of this for
a long time, framing it to reach new
people. Trump taps Palantir to create massive database
in every American.
Nicholas Fuentes says, Trump's promotion of Palantir is
the ultimate betrayal of his own people,
feeding every MAGA extremist,
in quotes, into the AI database controlled by
a CIA Mossad cutout.
Seriously? If Palantir is in the deep state,
then what is? That's
very good point to consider. Or and I'll
include the,
oops, that wasn't right. There it is.
Alright. This is based on a strategic culture
foundation article.
Basically, arguing what Doge was doing is is
that not just the deep state? And same
point. So the Doge the deep Doge state
is what I called it. Very much worth
reading. Understanding now that it seems to be
all of it together.
Haimpach Flick says this is serious. Trump's partnership
with Palantir Technologies aims to implement a March
2025 executive order mandating federal agencies to share
data.
Your data.
Very simply put, that's what that means.
My point is it's already happened. This is
them ret normalizing the reality of
it. He writes, this initiative has one goal,
centralize all government data, leveraging Palantir's foundry platform
that Israel's involved in. Palantir's foundry platform is
able to merge vast datasets.
He says, we're talking bank accounts, medical records,
driving record, student debt, disability status, political affiliation,
credit card expenditures, online purchases and activities, tax
filings, travel records, phone record records. That's what
this is really about. So when you you
know, Palantir being just a data thing, no.
This they're they're a technology's entity that was
been built in a way in order to
collect this for the building of AI.
And it says, if you don't think this
will lead to unchecked monitoring and zero oversight,
you need your head examined. Now I'm arguing
for the built of AI. That's what I
think it is. But, you know, the point
is just the way that they're collecting all
of this. He said he says, we're talking
about threatening freedom and ending your life as
you know it.
That's not even hyperbolic, guys. And he says,
this is light years beyond Real ID, Patriot
Act, and Prism.
This is a centralized, comprehensive, authoritarian
surveillance and control grid, and those who control
it desire to have complete power over you
and everyone else. So just I mean, just
for a brief side aside,
it's right it's you know, for me,
when they rolled out Stargate in, like, the
first week, I'm just like, that's gotta be
the end of this. Right? There's no way.
Maha in particular, but Republicans
second are are gonna take that at all.
And, sure, I was wrong, apparently, at least
for the team sports screaming partisans.
Didn't matter. It's a good thing that Trump
did it. Okay. Well, so the point is
that now here we are, barely in the
not even the first year,
and and they're rolling out this the control
grid. That's what Katherine's been calling out. Like,
in particular,
the the digital control grid. How long has
she been pointing that? And here we are.
As they're literally rolling this out, now you
can still argue it's for your benefit or
it's him fighting the deep state. Maybe.
But it's a little bit alarming to not
consider that it could be the very thing
you think you're fighting, and it's exactly what
we told you. Like, the point is, for
those now arguing it's them fighting deep state
or it's the good thing,
those were the same people that said we
were wrong this was gonna happen
before the selection process. Called us black pill
and purity test and whatever else. This is
what we were telling you was coming.
Look back. I'm not making this up. You
can look at what we were talking about,
like weeks, months, years before this, but we
were telling you this is what was coming.
And again,
of course, to make this easier, the White
House has scrap plans to block data brokers,
like Palantir,
from selling your personal data. So now they're
gonna use that and sell to the highest
bidder.
Anybody they want, and that's okay, apparently.
Now to walk back to wrap this up
toward the end
or rather toward I mean, rather,
excuse me. Not the end, but the the
previous to this. Right? Seeing how this is
built through Biden's administration,
through Trump's administration. And this goes back to
Trump's administration, through Biden's administration, into Trump, and
even before that.
Hear it again. This is not unique to
Trump. It's not partisan, guys. They're using partisanship
to get you to miss this. So this
is back to 02/2017.
Wired, how Peter Thiel's secretive data company pushed
into policing. Why do you think that
is? Jump quickly jumping now,
May 2025. Police across The US are now
adopting new AI surveillance.
Did we get are we okay with that?
Is that what we all want?
I mean, aren't we all pushing back on
what China has and all of a sudden,
Trump's rolling it out? Now, again, it's not
unique to him, but the people need to
hear that because they think he's saving you
from it. This is what's happening.
We have the overlap of Doge,
infiltration
into core of federal biometrics management,
setting off alarms. It's every single angle of
this. And as far as I'm concerned, Doge
and XXAI and Palantir, and it's all the
same conversation.
I mean, I yeah. I I mean, I
could be wrong on that and whether they're
competing or it's gonna end up in the
same way. But think about it from the
point that I think ultimately, if you can
at least consider that these are all scattered
data points of the same agenda.
Like, consider that they're all literally the same
thing fighting in the same path. And if
they keep you thinking they're independent, oh, here's
ChatGPT, over here's XAI, over there's Palantir,
then you you don't see the full picture.
Now, at least consider that they're all the
same thing. Now I don't mean literally the
same thing, but in the same like, they're
all on the same team working for the
same objective.
Worth considering. Now Derek also wrote May 2,
Palantir partners with NATO
on controversial AI project Maven.
Now this is where it gets wild to
me, and this overlaps with this car or,
actually, where was that?
This one.
Come back to the second. But so Palantir,
for
a a global sense with NATO to show
you and then think about the you can't
hide database with Starlink. Like, this is not
just about The US. Right now, that's the
starting point. But, guys, this is a global
surveillance network is what they're building out.
Project
Maven, we've talked about in the past.
Here's from the Palantir's website. Palantir expands Maven's
smart system
AI capabilities to military services.
Palantir,
this was on the
twentieth.
Was it,
that was on I think it was April,
actually.
But it says, Palantir Technologies today announced a
contract awarded by the DevCom Army Research Laboratory,
expanding Maven smart system access across the military
services to include the army, air force, space
force, navy, US corps. So if you're already
if you're if you just got outraged by
watching how much Palantir has immersed itself in
every other data point, recognize they already locked
in the military side of this
a long time ago. And this is just
the we just talked about the July
contract for the the defense department. This is
on top of that.
This is a smart AI system with drones
and whatever else. I mean, like, can we
not at least consider like, let's think of,
like, the data choke point and why it's
dangerous to have it all in one spot.
For the same reason, it's insanely dangerous
to allow one entity
this much control.
I mean, even if you think that, like,
maybe not even Trump or Elon. Maybe it's
Peter Thiel that's gonna take advantage of all
this or maybe it's Israel through him. The
bottom line is if you have this much
power and you can basically shut down, control,
delete everything in one location or control all
of the military through the AI you're rolling
out, we could be watching a massive artificial
intelligence coup taking place or any number of
ways to look at it. I also think
it's interesting how of all people in the
world, you have the current,
you know, conservative
background to this that's currently supporting Trump, who
are the most usually on guard to any
conversation about a coup, a regime change, and
now the markings are everywhere.
And I guess because you're winning, it doesn't
snake doesn't seem to be there. But it
says rapidly adopting the strongest AI capabilities to
enable warfighters around the globe.
Palantir's
platform will support AI enabled battle space awareness,
global integration, force management, contested logistics,
joint fires and targeting workflows.
Military,
killing people. That's what it's all about.
And overlapping that, I Zoe Smith interview, COVID
surveillance, Palantir, and the total the transition to
total information awareness. Now, one of the most
alarming things we talk about in this and
Zoe's really great work. Right? By the way,
I still wanna publish her out writings on
TLab, which haven't gotten around to it. They're
on the substack right now. But we talk
about
oh, what? Did I not have the I'll
just make a note of that. I guess
I forgot to put the tags on there.
We discussed in this interview, which you should
check out,
the idea, the overlapping idea of whether this
could end up being used for drones.
Well, it already is, but, like, from, like,
a health perspective, like but the point is
potentially using them for assassinations, for targeting, any
number of things. And with weirdly enough, at
the same time, we saw an overlap with,
like, the NSO, Pegasus, WhatsApp thing, and people
in Yemen, you and having their phone locations
being used for targeted attack.
This is
growing in an alarming way. And so with
the Maven overlap, with Palantir,
how long until we're under that kind of
technocratic surveillance, Panopticon control where
you did the wrong thing, you just disappear?
I'm not trying to be hyperbolic, guys. This
is where this all goes, and that's why
we talked about the great Palantir reset on
April 21.
Talking about the idea of not the great
reset
as we see it through some kind of
woke lens left leaning dynamic, but from whatever
works. And now Palantir. And realize again, Palantir
was working the last time. You just didn't
see them front and center. Now it is
the great reset, the reimagining, the build back
better right in front of you through Palantir
and everything else.
Now don't forget, it's not just one place.
It's global. The UK government publishes controversial NIH
COVID nineteen contracts with Palantir.
Yeah. It's it's all around, guys. And we
also saw the building, again, through this through
04/2004, leaked Palantir's plan to help ICE deport
people. That's how it started. Then it turned
out they were literally
using that to roll out, which I already
did was already happening, immigration OS. So that's
one side of this. My point is just
showing you all these different data points. All
these articles, you can read through. We've gone
over all this in past shows.
And here's the helping doge with massive IRS
data project. See, at each time, these were
one thing. Right? Where they were like, oh,
that's okay. They're just helping
make the IRS more efficient.
Hopefully, now you can stand back. And even
if that was at least one thing they
were doing, which clearly they didn't if it
was your being objective,
stand back and look at the big picture.
Justification,
narrative, rationale. And what are they doing? Scooping
up data from the IRS, from the DHS,
from the state department, from the IRS, from
ICE, from everything, and jamming it into one
database to watch you.
Oh, yeah. And let's not forget that they're
also rolling out the medical database
that RFK Jr is rolling out through HHS,
which as we showed you last time,
made the same point.
Where was it?
That they will be using
data sources.
Where was it? There it is.
Medication records, pharmacy chains, lab testing, genomic data.
They're saying they're gonna be using data from
your smartwatches, your fitness trackers, all linked together,
all for your benefit, of course. Now one
was about autism and another one was about
just general health. They're building medical databases. Now
it's the same conversation. Now if you if
you're looking at this,
it's not verifiable whether Palantir is a part
of that, but there's a lot of overlapping
information where it's suggesting that Palantir is in
fact what's being used here. But that's free
that's for another conversation. It's just simply the
continual database store collection centralization
of your data in every possible facet.
Former Palantir executive tapped to lead data security
at RFK Jr's health department. Oh, there you
go. Now that doesn't prove that that that
Palantir is working the database that he's building,
but what it shows you is Palantir is
immersed in every part of this conversation
and has access to it at the very
least.
Now this is the one I was talking
about earlier. Trade Whisperer simply shows you Palantir
and their empire as powerful as f, he
says. Here's a full list. Now it's not
the full list, but there's someone here that
we didn't mention in the articles that that
Derek did. Clark Miner, a 13 year old
Palantir veteran,
weird, is now RFK Jr's health and human
services chief financial officer.
This is the, which guy was that?
Which one was that? Now, just a he's
worked with Palantir for that long. I forget
anyway, there's there's something there's something about that.
I gotta circle back to that. So R.
K. Junior's Health Human Services chief information officer.
Didn't we just read something on that? Something's
connecting my mind right now on that guy.
Clark Miner. Give me a note in the
chat if you think that am I missing
something there. Gregory
bar Barbarcia,
Palantir's former head of intelligence investigations, hired as
the federal chief information officer. Jacob Helberg, senior
adviser to Palantir, was appointed undersecretary of state
for economic growth.
Are you are we kidding? Like, this is
insane.
Shyam Shanker, Palantir chief technology officer, reportedly being
considered for a high level Pentagon job. Anthony
Johnsco,
George Cooper, and one of the other engineers
have been associated with those recruitment effort, and
they are former Palantir forward deployed
engineers. Peter Thiel, of course, obvious, but it
goes on and on and on. And you
could read Derek's articles about the acolytes in
the administration, the different connections. It is wild.
More obvious than even Citibank and Obama. But
the point is, it's the same kind of
thing.
Now at the same time,
as you start with the medical database, don't
forget, considerations for use of artificial intelligence. Why?
For making drugs.
MRNA injections. They're this is AI created drugs.
Not a new conversation, but we always knew
it was coming here, and they're using your
data to execute it. And I guarantee you,
most everybody's not okay with this right now
for a million reasons. That's Stargate, if you
forgot. Stargate is quite literally an
AI program.
Here's this the, the clip of him saying
that. We gene sequence once we gene sequence
that cancer tumor,
you can then vaccinate the person,
to design a vaccine
for every individual person to vaccinate them against
that cancer.
Yeah. Or that's what they say. Right? And
what they do is get in very invasive
biometric personal data. Right? And that that's sort
of like the orb and and and,
Sam Altman. You know? The the the whole
world coin thing, they're still pushing, which is
insane to me.
I just I just really want you to
think about that. And whether or not what
we're discussing here
is just another push to get even more
invasive personalized information in real time. At the
regardless,
it is a mRNA
platform,
AI driven medical database, which is what republicans
more than anybody were calling out during Biden's
administration or just in the past COVID nineteen
push.
And you can make that vaccine, the that
mRNA
vaccine,
you can make that robotically, again, using AI
in about forty eight hours. So imagine early
cancer detection,
the development of a cancer vaccine for the
for your particular cancer aimed at you, and
have have that vaccine available in forty eight
hours. This is the promise of AI and
the promise of the future.
Well, there it is.
That's exactly what they're rolling out. As Derek
wrote, Stargate, Trump partners with technocrats to promote
mRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism.
Yep. There's Sam Altman,
Larry Ellison, Oracle, right, which was the pharmacovigilance
database during COVID nineteen that we've apparently never
got to really see because it proves they
hurt they killed everybody.
I'm and that was data they were scooping
up from the very beginning. They're supposed to
go over two years, they told us. And
they promised they wouldn't use it this way,
and here we are. Or SoftBank, which is
essentially Israel's funding arm for their unit a
200
dynamic. I mean, it's all very documented.
Very and and he's leading the financial side
of this. So very clear what's going on
to me.
Now, again, Brooke Jackson called this out earlier
just saying I call for an immediate suspension
of any regulatory authorizations or approvals that relied
on AI process data.
And we should. And that's that's not the
same as AI created drugs, but the point
is it's used in every process here, every
facet of what they're doing.
And she call she sees where this is
going. She knows better than anybody.
Also, in case you thought it was unique
to just certain sides of this, no. Even
the EPA.
Explain how that makes sense to me. Trump's
EPA is is a new a new new
mission, making The US the capital for
AI. Okay? Why does EPA have anything to
do with that? And, of course, reviving the
auto industry. Okay? It says they're doing all
this under the guise of efficiency,
but what they are really doing is dismantling
the agency from doing its job.
That's the intercept, by the way. No.
To me, the EPA is me, it's it's
it doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned.
It is a captured agency like the FDA
and like plenty of others. The point though
is that you're now using it in a
way that pushes I mean, he's come out
in weird ways to push weird things from
the beginning.
The Environmental Protection Agency is talking about AI
for car. I mean, it just shows you
that they're so hyper focused, like, they they've
lost the plot in my opinion, or that
they just need this to be all encompassing,
which is pretty clear to me. Now I'll
end with this point about this again. If
you already know they built out this satellite
network that's being used and AI is being
initiated for that to function, that's just the
global
beginning steps of where this is all it's
all it's coming in into fruition in front
of you. That's been built
out. You can't hide is what the National
Reconnaissance Office guy said about what they're building
because they have eyes everywhere. That's where we
are now. Let's not forget that his Starlink
push is also very conspicuous around this because
the Starlink is a central part of how
this all works.
And then recognize that whether it's just this
or multifaceted,
one part of the immigration conversation, one part
of the South Africa conversation was about this.
The Trump administration
leans on African countries. The goal, to get
STARLINK in these countries.
That's what it was about, STARLINK. And so
if they say no, which they did because
they're resistant to this administration and they're calling
out Israel's genocide, they suddenly
manufacture a false narrative of genocide happening for
white people in South Africa. Not to say
that there's not vote racially motivated violence. Very
clear. No one should deny that. Hardly a
genocide by any metric, especially since they're denying
this genocide in Gaza
based on the metrics and and then saying
what's happening here. And don't forget, we even
saw the really embarrassing thing where XAI admitted
that Elon altered it to say that.
In public conversation, Fortune did an article about
it. Crazy.
Here's another one, by the way. May 7.
E US pushes nations facing tariffs
to approve Starlink.
Different point. Same conversation.
This was them saying, well, if you take
the Starlink, we, you know, we won't you
wouldn't have any tariff issues there.
So maybe it was all literally about building
out this AI network, and that's what a
lot of us been saying. Now even for
myself, I've never said that's the only thing
because I always I think I'm very easy
to see that even if that's the central
thing, every underling had their own personal agenda.
Israel wants something different than what you know,
they're all vying for something. Then that was
that to imply that it was an underling,
which is simply people in every facet have
their own directions on top of what the
main thing is.
But you have to
especially with what we just went through today.
You can't miss
that every action they've taken has been in
part for this agenda. It's this agenda is
transparent now.
I mean, from the arguments of Europe to
what he's pushing back on Venezuela,
I mean, everything he's done
has led to this point,
at least in part. I just can't you
can't miss that.
And then I just mentioned this recently with
Charlie. This is the kind of stuff that
worries me, but we're
the we're beyond we're going we're rapidly going
beyond e like, right now, we're at a
point where this is already happening.
I think what this is referencing, and it
says leak reveals what Sam Altman and Joni
Ives are are cooking up, A hundred million
AI companion devices. If you read about it,
it's simply saying things that basically track you,
follow you in your pocket or however else
it works.
Maybe some other implantation.
That's not even hyperbolic. It's literally what this
conversation is about, but it's something that just
monitors. It's excuse me, unobtrusive.
Just it's there all the time.
But I'm what I reason I'm mentioning this
is that I think, as it says, and
they're not ex ex our glasses. You see?
It's something beyond that.
I am worried that what this will take
the form of is
kids.
Remember when you were school, at least my
generation, where Apple computers were the thing and
they got you playing, you know,
Oregon Trail and it was the newest thing
or ants or whatever it was,
And a lot of people got pulled into
that. And it it doesn't seem as nefarious
then because we use computers today. But it's
singular ideas, getting you to go in the
direction that they're they want you to. So
what if they rolled these out in schools?
As Trump is normalizing this into overtaking the
Department of Education, and all of a sudden,
they say, okay. Well, we need AI bots
to follow along the students and help keep
them on track. You know how many people
would support that right now? And then and
then you're we're done. I mean, at that
point, then you have the newest generation being
locked in at AI everywhere all the time.
I really worry about what this is right
here.
In general, the idea of AI companions for
anybody will do the same thing, but the
kid discussion of it is usually where they
strike. Something about that feels like that's what's
something my gut tells me that's where that's
gonna go. So keep an eye on it.
Let's see where this goes. My worry in
general is the normalization of this or rather
get us to a point to where we
feel like your phone that you can't live
without it. That feels like where they're going
with this, with Grok and all the rest
of it where you get to a point
where people think, well, I need that. That's
how I get x, y, and z. That's
how I efficiently do this.
You know? Go back to using a map,
guys. Stop being pulled into it, myself included.
We have to stop allowing this to take
over because that's exactly what they're trying to
accomplish. Now ending, I'm not gonna get into
this in-depth today, but I had to include
it. There's a much bigger part of this
that we're not really getting into, and that's
the physical representation of the technocratic agenda. K?
We've talked about the idea of
the the technocratic regime change that happened in
Honduras
under the guy it's called Prospera, under the
guise of a libertarian, you know,
utopia, which is it's not even libertarian, hardly
utopia. And Peter Thiel funds this. Elon Musk
provides Starlink.
The US regime change in 02/2009, very easy
to publicly look up, is why they were
allowed to do this. They overthrew the government,
then the the new person they then removed
judges so they could vote the thing in
that they wanted, allow them to do this.
They've revoked that sense with the new government,
but they didn't leave. And now they're the
new government literally just said recently they're gonna
try to overthrow them again. This is a
technocratic regime change. They're even absorbing new parts
of the area. It's also happening in other
places of the world. We've already heard these
conversations floated. I think El Salvador, in its
own way, is the same thing.
The point is you might have seen this.
Elon Musk wins vote to establish his own
city in Starbase, Texas.
This is, in my opinion, part of the
same conversation.
And what's weird about this,
here's this is from two days ago. Musk's
SpaceX town in Texas
warns residents
they may lose the right to continue using
their property.
Yeah. That's where the look. That's what's I
think it's called crawfish rock in Honduras is
dealing with that. I just think it's important
to see where we're going with this. And
if we're talking about AI government, technocratic control,
like, literal, like, you know, under the guide
what's funny is this is your fifteen minute
city or your you're at another flavor. It
is the same idea. And that's what they're
proposing for even Gaza. Trump says he wants
to take US to
wants The US to take Gaza and turn
it into a freedom zone.
It just couldn't be more clear if you
really stand back and connect the dots that
all of this stuff is interconnected, and they're
rationalizing and driving you into this central place
because it'll be easier to control.
It's crazy enough. I genuinely think that most
people, as I do with most of these,
are actually pretty aware of this,
but don't know what else to do.
So I I I don't have all the
answers.
My job most first and foremost is to
make sure that you see the problem, that
you can articulate it. You have the information
to realize it so so then you can
formulate the solutions that you think is best
for your life. First and foremost,
don't fall into these traps.
Stop using the tools they're providing. Call these
things out and make sure the world sees
that you're resistant to this path. Maybe that'll
be enough in momentum to make at least
slow it down.
But my god,
I sadly think that what they're doing right
now is beyond partisan influence.
So I I, you know, again, I don't
I don't we need to make this clear
to people, especially on the partisan sides, that
what's happening is not in the interest of
Americans.
It is invasive surveillance and occupation of where
you know, in in real sense, in my
opinion. But just help me call this out.
Because I I see more people every day
beginning to recognize this. And in history,
what what we've learned from it is that
when there's enough momentum, they do tend to
pull things back, almost always
come back from another angle. But that would
at least give us more time to try
to shift the direction.
Thank you for tuning in and continue to
support the work that we're doing. I mean,
again, I think today is a good example
of the demonstrated value of this platform. If
you've been watching this platform, you knew about
this a decade ago.
I mean, legitimately.
And there's a lot of other things like
that that we've talked about. Like, what's funny
is I I I was thinking about mentioning
this the other day. It's interesting how we
have a reputation, and I'm proud of that,
that we, you know, that we were, you
know, we're one of the most important during
COVID nineteen, and, you know, we're breaking this
stuff down before a lot of people were.
But what's interesting is if you became aware
of this platform during COVID nineteen, you might
be finding it interesting to go back and
look at things
before that.
We were
that right about things before COVID nineteen,
around Yemen, around Israel, around foreign policy, around
countless things, regime changes happening in the world.
And it's not because we were special or
guessing, it's because we cared, we looked, we
did the due diligence, we referenced it. You
know, we looked at all sources, considered all
the possibilities, and showed you what we thought
was the most logical outcome. And often enough,
that turned out to be the case. At
least arms you with the tools to be
able to be ahead of a story. Not
in a partisan way, not in a mainstream
way, but because you know, but but in
a fact based way. It's crazy. I know.
But take a look back at the website.
Look at the information and the work we've
done going back a decade or more, you
know, well before COVID nineteen, And you'll find
that we were wildly ahead of a lot
of stories. And that's not trying to pat
myself on the back. I'm trying to demonstrate
the value of why this platform is worth
your time. And if more than that, if
you think it's worth your time, it's worth
your donation.
That's how we that's how we survive in
this completely
manipulated world that we live in today. So
thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.