You're not real.
What? You are?
Is any of it real?
I mean, look at this.
Look at it.
A world built
on fantasy. Synthetic emotions in the form of
pills. Psychological warfare in the form of advertising.
Mind altering chemicals in the form
of food. Brainwashing seminars in the form of
media.
Isolated bubbles in the form of social networks.
Real money.
You wanna talk about reality?
We haven't lived in anything remotely close to
it since the turn of the century. We
turned it off. We got the batteries stacked
on a bag of GMOs while we tossed
the remnants in the ever expanding dumpster
of the human kid. Even as branded houses,
trademarked by corporations
built on bipolar numbers,
jumping up and down on digital displays,
hypnotizing us into the biggest slumber mankind has
ever seen. You have to dig pretty deep,
kiddo,
before you can find anything where you live
in a kingdom of bullshit.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Wednesday, 05/28/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Found some
very interesting
documents
that related to the Far Act that I
just had to discuss today that I think
are very profound in the larger
developing awareness
around a few different things. Israel being a
primary
example of this kind of growing awareness of
not just Zionism's influence around the world, but
specifically from an American perspective, what the Israeli
government and the Zionist organization that runs it
are achieving
what they've been doing for a very long
time. And so there's some interesting discussion that
I wanna have around the FAR act. And,
obviously, we're not going to get into the
overlap with JFK and and the important note
to make about how APAC
was being forced to register as a foreign
agent.
That was one of the main points going
back and forth around the JFK conversation at
the time, and they pushed back. There's a
lot of you know, and there's also the
conversation of the Dimona
Nuclear Facility and different there's plenty of points
involved. But, of course, the point is after
JFK was killed, that never happened.
We know what APAC is today. Very much
worth understanding the influence of something like that,
whether you think that was involved or not.
The point is it was supposed to register
as a foreign agent. That was the it
was the the major conversation be being had
because if they don't, well, as but we
see what happens today. They're able to frame
themselves as an American institution.
And that's an important thing to consider on
and, you know, not just that one point,
but what else is like that?
And what other ways are there,
you know, I guess, nuance or governmental manipulation
that allows entities that represent foreign governments to
not just influence American policy, but to pretend
to be American policy?
So it's a very important point to make
that overlaps with to be very clear
on documents we're talking about today, an interesting
point that overlaps with the Trump administration, but
it is not partisan.
And and and and I would argue that
today, this the Trump administration
of of the 2025
administration is one of the most, if not
the most Zionist packed administrations ever seen. I
just think that's a sign of the times,
not a left right discussion. Because Biden's administration,
every before everyone before it,
in incrementally growing ways have been blindly pro
Israel and pro Zionist.
Or we're gonna, make a point to start
around sort of the artificial intelligence bot manipulation
kind of point that I think is relevant
to kinda set the tone and overlap that
with an AI government point that I want
to include, two small things we wanna get
into. I shouldn't say small, but quick points
around health, all of which does overlap with
a larger kind of,
you know, social engineering largely Israel driven for
the conversation today, manipulation around that, and and
social engineering, social media, bots,
as well as the overlap with the main
point today, which is the FARA Act conversation
around, you know
specifically, in the case of these documents, but
the main the way I titled it today
is not meant to be a one point
thing today. If you've been following this show,
if you're even barely paying attention today, you
should be aware of the building body of
evidence that shows that the Israeli government and
other aspects of just Zionist society
have been influencing US policy,
legislation,
laws, government,
and media. This is not specifically about Jewish
people if you wanna make it a racist
point. There are Zionist atheist Jews. There are
Zionist Christians. It's a very important conversation to
see and not to couch into one small
thing. Yes. There is a Jewish overlap to
it. But the point is that to see
how wildly obvious it is that these things
are being influenced. So today, it's one more
point to add to that conversation, and this
is about specifically
an overlap with government and how deep that
may go, but the media side of it
that's listed.
Very important to see, and it's left and
right, as you may imagine.
But then to overlap that to end, one
point that I just could not not talk
about today was what you might have seen
going on with the the Gaza
aid distribution.
Even even calling it that is an affront
to aid distribution or any anything charitable or
good and what they just did to Palestinian
people. And then, again, to realize what that
shows you about the group, not only that
is, you know, I see are responsible for
a lot of this, but that your governments
are blindly supporting,
obfuscating for,
I mean,
everything. Literally everything they can possibly do to
maintain the worst thing we've ever had to
watch and live through, acknowledge
the ongoing livestream genocide of the century. It's
disgusting. But we'll make make sure that you
see how it all ties together today. But
I wanna start with a point.
Oh, and, of course, I I played that
clip to end nothing on the last show.
But I think it's an important way to
start the show with the idea of what
that from, mister robot for the podcast is
what that clip is from. Every time I
play that, I get,
boxed out of YouTube. They're probably already censoring
the show. Frankly, I don't care about YouTube
today. But the clip is about simply acknowledging
this false reality that we live in. And
And that's gonna start with the point about
the bots and the artificial intelligence. But as
we go through the conversation today and talk
about,
again, not just Israel and Zionism, that's the
point we're making today. And it obviously is
a central part to a lot of these
conversations, not because I want it to be,
because that's what the evidence shows. But I
want you to think about
the many different ways that that kind of
influence can affect what we're talking about today.
Policy, legislation, news, obviously. But what else? You
know, what else can we talked about the
bots online, social media, how that can influence
your conversations with your family, what you think
about things, you know, well beyond just the
current policy or the current political conversation. And
that's really important to see. So we'll start
with that point on the bots.
And I wanted to start here, which is
interesting. This has been going around. And what's
funny about this is this this is just
a there's you can there's a lot of
points like this that you can make. There's
random things that you can find, like somebody
sharing this video that simply says, AI controlled
bot farm, hundreds of them tossing thousands of
comments and posting design. Now this is a
video that this guy posted. I can't look
at the video and know exactly where it
comes from or what it ultimately is or
even if that's what he's showing. The point
is about highlighting that we all know there
are bots everywhere and using this as an
opportunity to say, this is a server farm
or it appears to be phones hooked into
this. The point is just to make the
reference point of we're all being manipulated by
bots.
But what's interesting and, rightly, we don't that's
let me point out what this guy says.
For actually, first, let me play the video
just so you can see it. It's it's
interesting.
Those are all small
phones
plugged
in.
Mask with server banks. And honestly, this is
probably a small one. Not server banks. You
can always look into Get With The
Kerbers.
But so the point is that you can
clearly see that there are, you know, that
we know that there are massive server bot
farms all over the world. And that it
this shouldn't even be dismissed. And we it's
some it it never really should have been,
especially today. I simply said, this is who
you're arguing with online right now. Yeah. Just
to kinda make a or they're just arguing
with right now. Just to make a point.
To recognize that maybe you're talking you're, you
know, even a point that I should listen
to that I fall into myself all the
time, maybe you're arguing with somebody that doesn't
even exist. Hashtag social engineering, two party illusion.
Now Dave Riley points out, I don't know
if this is true, but and points out
what, Denny,
Deburdende,
I'm probably mispronouncing it, and simply says, it's
a mobile browser testing farm like the ones,
you know, basically testing. Bottom line, suggesting it's
likely
same, is is to understand that what we're
discussing is the undeniable
reality of bots and server bot farms and
and possibly this. I mean, because that very
much, I'm not gonna take his statement at
face value either. It does appear to be
phones all plugged in, which would make sense.
His argument is that there's less
less costly ways to do it. Either way,
you guys can tell me what you think.
Again, the major point is you're online arguing
with people right now, and it's likely people
that aren't even there or people that are
meant to manipulate you into very clear channels
of thought using things that outrage you based
on your profile that they have from before.
Just think about this stuff. I don't know.
You you can't go too deep because it'll
make you go crazy. But just keep it
in mind when things matter, When there's a
big surge of things happening or a conversation
shifting and all of a sudden everything seems
to be pointing in the same direction, at
least make sure you keep that in your
mind. That we are being gamed every single
day of every moment we're online right now.
That's very, very important.
So I want to highlight that with censored
man's post from before, which is just this
is, I think, from twenty twenty four, June,
where he's just making this general point. I
actually, I think I,
I guess I did forget to grab it.
There was I I I posted this under
Elon Musk tweet about bots going like, well,
you know better than anybody. And this is
simply Israel
working with with with not just Israel. It's
the ADL. It's Zionism and everything else overlapping
with this platform. We'll go through that in
a minute. But on this platform, he makes
a really good point and breaks down what,
you know, Israel's CHEQ to help Musk battle
bots on Twitter. And this is a whole
thread. You can or whole breakdown of information.
He and just search his account for CHEQ
or just read the breakdown here. The point
is simply that this is a platform
that basically
being hired to stop the bots, but is
literally flooding this platform with Israeli bots, which
I don't think anybody's denying anymore. So it
just shows you and he's and that he
breaks this down. He's trying to I've gone
through this post many times. He breaks it
all down for you right here, breaks down
the guy that works for this, who is
an Israeli intelligence officer. It's not hard to
see how this all pieces together. Then, of
course, let's not forget that Elon Musk gets
money, bill billions from BlackRock, which should matter
but only doesn't when it's on one side
of the conversation,
or that Twitter
is DARPA's program, XAI. And now that XAI
has bought Twitter, they're all the same thing.
And I argue we're always the same thing.
This is just them cycling this down to
make it more digestible for you and maybe
have your guy be the one that brings
it you know, so you don't push back
because your guy did it or whatever.
By the way, right now, there's weird stuff
going on with the website. I'm not sure
exactly what. Seems like every day, there's something
new for this platform. You're guys used to
that by now. Just use it as another
excuse to support us in some way. Buy
some t shirts off the website. We have
our ones that are on sale from the
Truth Clothing as well as the new website
that is, Big Frog, which is all on
the main website. You can buy them all,
support us. The point is that we're being
attacked every day, it seems. Right now, there's
something going on with the site. Only certain
browsers are loading it. My team's looking at
it, but just that's why it looks like
this is a screenshot because it is, because
I can't bring it up. But quiet transition
from DARPA's Exa to Elon's Exa. You guys
have seen all this many times. It's just
showing you that this is an operation. Clearly,
this is not some one one stop thing.
CEO
Linda Yaccarino from World Economic Forum is, quote,
successfully censoring lawful but awful speech. And, of
course, the main point is what she said
about the ADL, which we know by now.
Iaccarino and Greenblatt have publicly described their meeting
as productive. He met she met with the
ADL. Remember, she said they're now partnered together.
Iaccarino clarifies the issue that's being debated is
not
not about supporting ADL's mission to fight antisemitism.
Totally not that. We're all on we're all
in, she says, on the fight of antisemitism.
The issue is about the ADL misrepresenting
or not addressing the progress we've made in
our effort to do what you asked us.
That's what she just said, and that's not
changed. So ever since then, they're they're they're
striving not to do anything different other than
to prove to the ADL that they are,
in fact, doing what you're already asking. So
stop misrepresenting
that we're
you know like, stop claiming that we're not
censoring enough because we're censoring as much as
you need us to based on this conversation.
That's what she's saying, and that's what's happening.
We all know this if we're not blinded
by partisanship. She's been proudly making this clear.
They have been fighting for against the idea
of antisemitism, which is just a it's a
speech converse it's a speech point. It's ideology.
You're allowed to do either of those things
in any way you want. That's not the
same thing as supporting a terrorist organization. And
most of the cases we know they're calling
antisemitism
aren't even that. Even Jewish people around the
world are calling this out today. So
overlapping this with the censorship conversation, I wanna
make a quick point about
AI government and how this overlaps with Doge
and all the rest. There's a reason I
pointed those first things out. Bots,
influence, manipulation,
social engineering, but how Twitter very much dovetails,
like, completely meshes with the Israeli government. You
can't hide this today. Rather specifically, the Zionist
agenda, but it's not hard to see how
this overlaps. Then overlapping this with a larger
point of how this is the the AI
government direction is going. There's only gonna be
a quick point on this. The rest of
it's gonna be around but you you'll see
how all this ties together. I just wanna
highlight this show again.
The impending future of AI government. But who
controls the AI seems to be the central
conversation around that, seeing as how we're not
even on the not even debating whether it
should happen anymore, just how, which is always
how this goes. I'm still of the mind
that, hey. Why don't we just stop the
whole thing?
Also, the new Trump administration and the technocratic
Zionist coup of the United
States. For the podcast, both those are shows
I'll include in the show notes, it's about
showing you how these things interconnect. So if
the current administration, as well as the past,
have been influenced, if not occupied, by a
foreign government, and they're rolling out some massive
AI overtaking of our government, maybe we should
ask whether there's something happening here like a
technocratic coup. Not to say we could absolutely
say that's the case, but we should be
asking these questions. So here's an interesting link
or video, excuse me,
about AI government in the bill that was
just passed. Now we already highlighted the thing
that stood out to us, which was the
you're not allowed to,
I guess, criticize or call out or undermine
or, you know, what do anything to slow
down AI for ten years, which is just
the most terrifying thing in the world with
where we are right now. That's in the
new big, beautiful I I hate the fact
that we even all seem to call it
the big, beautiful bill. Why are we so
silly? Why is that it's so easy to
do, it seems. And we all just follow
along with the recent bill that's there.
Includes some more stuff that you might not
have seen. Todd shared this. He says, what
your team Republicans and Democrats won't tell you
is this. The bill includes this, impunity for
AI, guided drones, and exterminate Americans with impunity
for ten years. Now that's the way he
frames it. But the point is, you could
argue that's exactly what it could be. It's
simply about no oversight whatsoever with AI as
this explodes in the most dangerous time around
AI
and something else.
Today, we're gonna go down one of the
largest rabbit holes I've ever found, and this
is the replacement of the government with AI,
and that's what's in this bill. Let's talk
about it.
So in section four three two zero one,
it talks about replacing the Department of Commerce
with AI. Now the question comes with, what
else do they replace with AI? So just
think about that before you even go forward.
Like, this is not even a shocking point.
They've already got a g for the General
Service Administration. They've already got a bot that's
basically functional,
the GSAI bot. This is not new. We
a lot of us have been ringing this
bell for a long time. Like, what I'm
talking about is full on, like, may you
know, you could say sentient if you think
that's where we're going or just some kind
of, like, functional AI government
where it's dictating policy and, you know, that
that's what I really think is where they're
driving toward. Maybe because they think they can
ultimately dictate or control it, which is one
of the worries we all have.
But this,
like, running a an a department by they're
already basically doing that. And that's and and
now they're adding the idea where there's no
oversight for ten years. I mean, what does
that look like after ten years? You know,
where do we wake up and find ourselves
in? Are we in some technocratic hellhole Panopticon
with an Israeli flag flying over? I mean,
who knows? That's why that's a crazy thing
to not push back on. But everyone's distracted
by the partisan game. The big beautiful bill
and these major points, they shove in your
face so we miss the fire the forest
for the trees. And that's not even to
say the big major parts are
bad or or rather that we shouldn't care
about them.
That they it all matters, but we always
tend to they get I think that's the
way this is largely set up these days,
is where they give you things. And you
in my opinion, it used to be sort
of distractionary with some things, where Where you'd
realize, well, that's not even ultimately important, and
we got distracted from this. Today, it seems
like you get distracted with other very important
things. But ultimately, there's one major agenda. And
maybe that's always how it's been. At the
end of the day,
it seems like everyone gets even I mean,
even people in my position, we get pulled
into the mainstream conversation or now the mainstream
alternative media conversation with the mainstream, and they
fake show they give you this fake version
of how that's everything,
and people gravitate into what they want you
to look at. Instead, this seems like much
more important to me. And here's where it
gets really strange. It talks about in this
section below that no politician or governing body
may stop AI for the next ten years
or enforce any laws or regulations regulating artificial
intelligence models.
That's Silicon Valley owning the government.
Then we find Silicon Valley And that's not
an incorrect way to frame that. Right? I
mean, if if you know if now you
I mean, you could use a different term
in Silicon Valley. There's plenty of terms you
could overlap with that, including the intelligence apparatus.
The point though is that that means they're
able to build into this
from from a seemingly an unfettered completely with
lacking
any oversight kind of direction through the government
with the AI infrastructure they're building.
And I guess we just pretend like that's
gonna be what you want because you vote
you think you voted for somebody that I
mean, it's just it seems like this kind
of wild naivete that we're dealing with where
people are blinding themselves to anything that happens
around the guy that they like on both
sides of the paradigm. And meanwhile, the whole
infrastructure through it, whether Silicon Valley or AI
or Israel just never slows down either side.
They get what they want from a different
flavor each time, and we all battle each
other. You know? It's just like this is
this tiresome effort that we've been all a
lot of us have been trying to ring
this bell that we as long as we're
dealing with the idiots on Twitter screaming back
and forth, we're not gonna actually end up
seeing what's happening right in front of us.
Look at what happened during COVID nineteen. I
mean, we all seem to know that something
bad happened, that we can acknowledge there were
crimes committed, but we're all just letting this
drift into the background.
How is that possible?
Because of people stuck in the teams who
are politics rear
arena who only want you to look where
they're pointing. Manipulating
the weather.
Then it gets weirder when we find AI
and
that's Silicon Valley owning the government.
Then we find Silicon Valley manipulating the weather.
Then it gets weirder when we find AI
and Silicon Valley entering the health care system
to control all of that. And Now he's
making these really quick points, but these are
you could look these up. We've talked about
all this. We already that's what Stargate is.
That is the AI direction for medicine. And
so if you're like, you have to understand
by pretending like AI is just you know,
it's gonna help people use their arms again
and make Neuralink work. It's literally everything. They
have now made infrastructure buildings for every single
thing you're talking about, whether it's your medicines
or whatever you think you're gonna
you're not getting what you're asking for. If
you think you're gonna make America healthy again,
well, you may be thinking that, maybe nodding
their head, but what they're talking about is
artificial intelligence, nanotechnology,
and the things that we don't want.
Any other direction. Now at least that's how
I see it. I don't I don't know
many Americans that are all clamoring for this
great reset, build back better dynamic, even even
Democrats.
But that does seem to be what's happening
right now. You can't sue any of these
companies. Isn't that odd? That's also the other
point to make is whether it's the AI.
So that's actually really interesting to think about.
If we're talking about AI medicine or whatever
you wanna call it, Stargate is what Trump's
administration is rolling out for mRNA cancer shots.
They're you he they told you they were
gonna use AI to build these things. Right?
Okay. Well, if they just passed a bill
that said there's ten years of no oversight
for these AI directions where you can't sue
them, same thing with the in fact, the
same overlap with the drug dynamic where they're
making vaccines where you can't sue them.
We're building up this dynamic where there's literally
not even an ability to try to hold
anybody accountable anymore.
I mean, they're not gonna frame it that
way. It sure as hell feels like that's
what's coming.
And this kinda reminds me of the vaccine
protection act signed by Reagan in 1986,
protecting all the vaccine companies from damages.
There were so many lawsuits that they were
actually gonna go out of business, but the
government protected them. That's a very good point.
So it's just just the new vaccine protection
act. It's just the new yeah. Seems that
way. Seems we're venturing into the next technocratic
stage of the same broken governmental system.
Then it gets even deeper when we find
Billy Boy Clinton in the telecommunication
act of 1996.
He passed a bill so if they put
a cell phone tower in front of your
house, you can't sue for any damages. Do
you see how the government is kinda setting
this up? Yep. And then they're gonna replace
the government with AI?
It's kinda really strange. It's almost like Black
Mirror.
Now that last part is where you kinda
lose people. As much as it's very I
mean, I mean, that's about as likely as
anything else. I mean, it it almost seems
like it's something that they're literally trying to
build out.
But it's not worth I mean, it should
be something we dismiss. The re the legitimate
reality of that being built out is something
they've discussed.
But put aside that last point. And, yes,
even the black mirror point. That almost makes
me feel more, you know, like you're being
Well, it's two ways to look at how
Black Mirror works. Predictive programming, social engineering. Either
it's something that they want to, you know,
get you looking
away from the larger thing happening or they
wanna prime you for what they're gonna be
rolling out. And that's not all or nothing.
But throughout history, you can look back and
find the media the way it's used. It's
typically one of those two things. Either way,
that seems pretty interesting to me. And are
you hearing that talked about? Is that a
major part of the conversation? Not from my
perspective,
but it's certainly coming.
Brenton Circus points this out around the Amy
Gleason point. We made this the point about
Doge. Remember? Amy Gleason supposedly the acting administrator,
but no one even knows. Is she is
she is she even real? I I don't
even know. I mean, I'm kinda being prestigious.
I'd imagine we could verify if she's a
real person or not. My gut my gut
tells me that this is just a stand
in, if not actually a fake thing, just
as an interesting point. I mean, I I
asked this last time. I I did I
looked into this, and I wasn't able to
find any, like, ongoing you guys tell me
if you can find something, like an active
Twitter feed, anything to prove this person is
actually real. I'm not talking about doxxing or
evacing invading your personal privacy.
I'm talking about finding something publicly online that
shows engagement, and even that could be faked
by AI.
But my point is
we talked about this as either her being
that or the building steps toward that direction.
Don't forget that Doge was just simply the
repackaging of the digital services for the US
government, which she was a part of before.
Amy Gleason, he writes, is not is nominally
the person in charge of those. They tell
you that anyway. Gleason was also chosen to
lead something called Prime, aka the pandemic ready
interoperable modernization
effort that was funded by the CARES Act.
So, essentially, the first attempt to do this
under COVID narrative. Then that didn't work, so
we roll it out under, you know, whatever
Elon screeches about that day narrative. You know?
Well, immigration or pedophiles or whatever Muslims, and
that's not why it makes sense. I'm kinda
joking. The point is that you can see
that they use the current narratives
to rationalize. Remember during the beginning of the
COVID nineteen thing, we were all make at
least we were doing in the show making
a list of, like, all the different boxes
that are being checked, like, all the conspiracy
theories that were never gonna happen, that were
all beginning to happen because of this because
of COVID or because of pathogen.
Same kind of thing. So now the you
know, rolling the modernization
efficiency movement out under this didn't really roll
out, and so now it's happening elsewhere. Doge
and Prime have the same overarching goal, by
the way,
to government wide IT modernization
using artificial intelligence. That's what we're dealing with.
And so he writes. He said, basically, TLAB
is correct. I appreciate that. That is what
we're dealing with. So interesting to think about.
You know, you'd think that the the people
you typically called conspiracy theorists would be the
first ones to be like, that seems a
little bit suspicious.
But not one of their team, I guess.
But I'll include the deep Doge deep state
conversation
that really highlights how what they built out
kind of just is the deep state, if
you understand what we're talking about, or the
efficiency movement. And Doge is efficiency a gateway
technocracy. Derek wrote that. Absolutely. And let's not
forget all the different
you know, I can't tell whether I've my
or my gut
tells me that this is more so, like,
wanting us to take the bait. But we've
seen a lot of this conversation. Here's a
new one. AI revolt. New chat GPT model
refuses to shut down when instructed.
True street media shared something about how it
was basically trying to blackmail people so it
wouldn't be shut down. It's like, okay. If
that's even slightly real, how the f are
we even barely going in this direction?
That is the wildest thing. Or they're making
it up for some weird reason, like, to
channel us to a certain direction. I mean,
that does like, Whitney points out about the
the concerns of AI, and maybe the point
is they can't ever really reach that. You
know? It's it's hard to tell. But the
simple idea is like, well, that's crazy. So
we're talking about something refusing to shut down.
So the two questions here, either asking whether
this is about manipulating you to a certain
end or,
I guess, the way my mind goes, is
that not possible? If that's real, that we're
long past that,
that this is you being normalized into the
point in which they break they break it
down to you later. Oh, yes. Sorry. AI
took over seventeen years ago. We didn't tell
you. Now it's already in control, but it's
our it's our savior.
It's the good AI that's saving us. It's
our new religion. I mean, I'm I'm kind
of jamming a bunch of interesting things right
there together being facetious, but, you know, think
about that. If we keep hearing all of
this conversation about how, you know, this refused
to shut down or it's blackmailing people so
it won't be shut down or it's like,
you know, it's lying in very suspicious ways
or saying it has to destroy humanity because
we're gonna kill everybody. All those things have
happened. At least we're told they have.
So you gotta wonder,
could it not already have happened? You know?
Or did they already, like we know they
do, break something in the background, like, you
know, not break something, like, you know, breakthrough
some way in the background and decide to
test it out, and it went out of
control. Like,
this shit possible,
like, Eli, or are those who we're meant
to buy into? You know, the bottom line
is it seems like a possible thing to
consider, and now they're slowly beginning to rationalize,
normalize
our ideas of why this is what needs
to happen so
it becomes
what happens. I mean, it's worth considering.
You know, in in an interesting
sort of, like, you know,
almost entertaining kind of movie way, but also
very alarming, dark, scary, like, is that possible
kind of way. Now people tend to avoid
those conversations because it does seem, you know,
science fiction. But do we need to be
able to stand back and look at all
the data points. Every single thing that's
present shows you that that's possible.
Not some, like, twenty years from now thing,
but, like, as we're discussing this, if what
we're being told is true. So keeping all
that in mind, I wanna do a quick
couple quick points about two two party illusion
stuff that I think is relevant as well
as health overlap. But the main point being
the same thing we just talked about, the
influential social engineering manipulation,
how that overlaps, what we're gonna get to
from the government side of it, but how
both things are happening at the same time.
Social media manipulation, AI manipulation,
AI governance, government,
and, you know, just straight up old fashioned
government manipulation. And those things are one and
the same today. So while we have all
this happening and all these, like, incredibly,
I
mean, interesting but terrifying developments that are happening
in the world right now. Like, earth shattering
developments, whether war or complete technocratic, you know,
all sorts of things, you get a lot
of weird deviations from the partisans, which I
think is falling flat for most of the
partisans because it seems childish in the face
of what's happening in the world. But stuff
like this, the auto pen, that I just
think is hilarious to me. And I wanna
make this point where he comes out and
he just says and I I just talked
about this. Auto pen equals treason.
So what did I do? We just talked
about this. It's such a frustrating conversation because,
look, I don't agree with anybody using the
auto pen in the pre position of authority.
It seems ridiculous.
Nonetheless, though, you should acknowledge that it has
been roundly upheld, and I'll show you that
in a second. Whether for pardons or legislation,
not saying I agree with that. It is
the reality, though.
So the question is not whether it's being
used. That is the weird partisan bull you
know, the because of idiots like this online
who are making dumb statements like this, who
then get their other dumb followers to go
along with it and go, he's auto pen.
He's a liar. Okay. Well, are you aware
that Trump uses one too or has in
the past? That is the reality. Even Grok
will tell you that, but you can look
it up elsewhere.
I said, so you're saying Trump and Biden
both committed treason?
It's just funny to me. Here here is
the actual post from it from Rock. Just
says, yes. There's evidence suggesting the former that
Donald Trump has used the auto pen to
sign documents
during his presidency. It goes on to talk
about,
specifically,
where like, you know, documents in general. So
dot you know, not just something in aim,
but documents as well. Either way, the point
is this is a public conversation. You can
look it up how it's not unique. And
the conversation is them accusing Biden of doing
it or somebody else doing it for him.
So what's hilarious is that thing gets watered
down to just using it equals bad because
of idiots like this. And then you try
to argue with people like, well, wait a
minute. It's not about whether he even used
it. It's about whether somebody else did on
his behalf, especially without him knowing it. And
we should all care about that. The one
part, by the way, that seems they have
basically no evidence to back up. I wouldn't
deny it for a second. Biden was senile
and losing his mind. So, it seems almost
likely that it could even rationalize why it
would be okay to do. Even then, that
would still be a crime. My point is,
I don't see any way that they can
They're not proving that. They're going, well, he
was clearly senile. Therefore, we know they did
this. That's what they all do on all
the shows I've seen. And Jones and the
rest will share it and go, we knew
it. Well, you knew what? That he had
an opinion about that? That has all actually
happened in that interview. So what's funny though
is that this continues to be the misrepresentation.
So the question is not whether it was
used, but whether it was used by somebody
other than the president. And so you get
comments like this, where they go, no. No.
None of that's evidence. Mainstream media, oh, you're
buying what they said. It's like, okay.
It's grok, though. You blindly take it at
face value in every other context, but the
moment it says what you don't like, it
becomes you're taking them at face value. I'm
just pointing to a data point you can
read for yourself. My point was
regardless of the fact that they're lying about
whether he did it, that's the only thing
he's pushing back on. That that's not they
didn't Trump didn't do that. That's mainstream media
lying about him. I said, okay. Are you
aware that use of the auto pen has
been roundly upheld even for bills and pardons?
Likely not. And, no, I'm not saying I
agree. Partisanship kills logic.
I was arguing against crap evidence. I stand
by my argument. Okay. Well, it's fine though.
But then you're just pivoting away from the
only we're not arguing about whether the evidence
is the case. We're arguing about whether the
pen conversation is the reality, which is what
your statement was actually about. The point,
not that I agree with it, put the
use of auto pen by a US president
to sign official documents, including bills and parts,
is generally considered legal. It is the reality.
So we should care about whether it's being
I'm showing you all this to show you
how easy it is to deviate people
the smallest way using manipulators like these people,
like this guy. And it works. People fall
for it. And it's dangerous because it gets
you sidetracked
about very you know, things that are aren't
they do have importance.
But you get fixated on a part of
that important conversation that means nothing.
In fact, things that you're wrong about, like,
you know, the fixating on the illegal immigrants
don't have constitutional rights. It's like, are we
really still there? Like, that is a fundamentally
proven point. So we can't even have the
real conversation until you can just acknowledge the
basic provable fact. Doesn't happen, though.
So it's frustrating. So that is a two
the two party illusion part of it is
always going to keep the information suppressed
or hide things like this. So if you
have a t if you have people that
have been calling out the great reset, calling
out the you know, anything
largely on the left from their perspective that
is about
the during the COVID nineteen illusion, right, whether
it's about, you know, injections and lockdowns or
any number of things or the greater point
about the great reset about building back better,
all of it.
If you saw them discuss an alternative
international health system,
would you go, yay. That's what I'm asking
for. Or would you go, well, that's the
thing we're fighting, building the system back into
an well, okay. So
secretary Kennedy comes out and says, I had
a wonderful meeting with Malay, who is another
Zionist manipulating, lying libertarian. It's the reality.
Mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation
of an alternative
international health system. Okay. So if you're pulling
away from the international health system that we
don't want and you're creating an alternative international
health system, how is that America First?
How is that anything other than more globalist
direction? Now, look, I'm sure plenty of people
disagree or argue that they don't all want
that. That's fine. Well, I'm trim highlighting the
hypocrisy here. And I simply said, I wasn't
aware that we were calling, any of us,
for an alternative international health system.
So you could say this is reimagining
the current system, if you will, as opposed
to destroying it. Just a thought.
I know you guys get it. Actually, as
as tinfoil girl points out, the bait and
switch is at it again.
Now I'm not saying RFK. Maybe I look.
I actually would get the I would make
the argument that RFK, that's not inconsistent with
what he said. And I think he's I
think he's argued that is necessary in the
past. So it's not about him being contradictory
or hypocritical. It's about the larger agenda of
the administration and whether you want that, whether
you called for that. And you you already
know that's not true. The vast majority of
conservatives were not calling for that. They were
calling for more inter America First
Nationalism, you know, not growing outwardly.
That's the point.
I'll I'll include some of the discussions we've
had in the past. Make America healthy again,
in parentheses, with GMOs, pharmaceuticals, AI, and nanotech.
That's the real point.
The partisan implosion, that was back on 12/28/2024.
The Stargate conversation, Trump partners with technocrats to
promote mRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism as well
as his shocking hypocrisy about around MMR vaccines,
just showing you the wrong direction, in my
opinion.
But here's what Denny Rancourt had to say.
Oh, you know what? Did I forget to
play?
No. I didn't. Okay. Good. Making sure I
didn't miss a a clip there. I feel
like I had a clip that I didn't
play.
I don't wanna go back. Alright. So sorry
if I missed something there.
The clip here, I'll play first, is RFK
Junior discussing the shots.
Now same thing here. And I'm only I'm
only making this effort to tie it through
because I do think there's a connection, but
it's because of the main point of the
show today. You can't ignore
Israeli government influence over the Pfizer shot. They
literally called it Pfizer's lab. They they they
were integral they were working well, let's not
forget the US government, Donald Trump's administration, Operation
Warp Speed, and the wild influence they had
through his administration just like they did today.
And then we have the clear influence over
the larger conversation from Israel. We have the
many different weird points that that you know,
we can go a long way into the
different anomalies that happened around this one with
Iran and Italy and the overlap and ethnic
bio up in conversation. There's a lot of
stuff. The point is only including that is
that I wanna point out the health overlap
and how the mRNA shot direction
is still going as they wanna build a
new international health system.
Denny Renko oh, actually, let me play it
first. Showing you that there is
a positive here as we already said. And
it does appear that they have now not
just we're going to
not recommend them, which is not the same
as taking them off the schedule.
And they said we're going to, but now
they have stated we are now stating that,
which is just a why couldn't they just
say that in the first place? It's weird.
But here's what they said
in regard to we're now no longer recommending
it for this category.
Not the same as what they promised, but
it is still a good step. Hi, everybody.
I'm Robert f Kennedy junior, your HHS secretary,
and I'm here today with NIH director, doctor
Jay Bhattacharya
and
FDA commissioner doctor Marty Makary.
I couldn't be more pleased to announce that
as of today,
the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy
pregnant women
has been removed
from the CDC
recommended
immunization
schedule.
Last year, the Biden administration
So for healthy, and that's the point of
the midlife time,
they broadened out the the things that allow
you to be in the hat risk category
to be very broad, more than before. So
now now most people are in that category,
and we went over this. They're pretty small
things that allow you to be out of
the at risk category. Bottom line, though, as
we're gonna highlight,
this should be this shouldn't be allowed for
anybody. It's not a question of liberty or
freedom. It's not something growing in the ground.
It's something that your tax dollars are paying
for that we can prove is deadly,
and they know that. He has said that.
And yet now they're allowing you to make
that choice? That seems manipulative, especially since I
think we're well beyond the COVID nineteen shot.
Whatever this agenda has become, it's moving beyond
that. So keep that in mind. Urge healthy
children to get yet another
COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical
data.
For all of it. I could argue there's
no debt clinical data that proves it's healthy
for anybody.
Right? So it's odd that we can all
acknowledge that, but, yeah, we can highlight the
one example that makes this statement feel, you
know, we there's no clinical data. Well, guys,
there's no clinical data for pregnant women at
all. There's no clinical data for the combination
of the shots. I mean, we've gone over
this endlessly. Or there's no clinical data for
taking it alongside the flu shot of which
they still recommend.
Don't those things matter? You don't think he
knows that? You could argue he's taken one
thing at a time. Fine. In the meantime,
let them keep getting sick and dying while
we
organize our thoughts.
I just don't think it makes sense. Support
the repeat booster strategy in children.
That ends today. It's common sense, and it's
good science.
There's no evidence healthy kids need it today.
And most countries Today.
Why would you just say don't need it?
Have stopped recommending it for children. We're now
one step closer to realizing president Trump's promise
to make America
healthy again.
Well, that was your promise, but
I I do I think that, nonetheless,
even though I'm I'm just, like, I'm not
buying it, quite frankly, it's still a positive
step, and I'll call it that. Anything that
gives you any more removal from this dangerous
thing is still a positive step. But here
is what some of the people I respect
had to say.
Danny Rancu says, I'm sorry, guys, but your
announcement implies that COVID vaccines are good policy
for many non healthy children and nonhealthy pregnant
women. Well, I I I I don't know
if you I I feel like he's kinda
saying it the other way around, but I'll
read it through. And for everyone else, especially
the elderly. You are in effect promoting these
useless and toxic injections. He's right about that.
Not a good day for Ma.
Like, the way I think he's trying to
say this, and maybe I'm just reading it
wrong, is that you're basically saying it's a
good policy for everybody other than the people
you're saying we're pulling it away from, which
is a whole lot of people. So that's
already bad. Nobody
is benefiting from these things. All of the
science we have, the massive body of evidence
shows you not only do you not need
it for the thing they're pointing to, that's
less than the flu from day one, it's
only less today. But the reality is, if
they're at all, that these things are dramatically
bad, dangerous.
Contaminants contaminants
depending on where you get it from, DNA
manipulation,
all sorts of overlapping issues, myocarditis and blood
clots, and, I mean, it goes on forever.
He knows this. And yet we're saying I
just I that's I'm with these people. This
is a whole line in the sand. There's
no middle ground here. Like I said, it's
like pretending that arsenic is okay as long
as you pick it up yourself. If you
know it's dangerous, then say that. I mean,
at the very least, come out and say
these will kill you, but your choice. That
would be real liberty and freedom in the
context you you're trying to use it as.
My point is it's not the same as
something natural or something you can pull out
of your that you can make yourself. That's
where I argue that's the you know, the
government has no right to step in and
stop you even if it's gonna hurt you.
In this case, your tax dollars are paying
for it. They knew what they built. They
know what they're doing. And now they're acting
like it's their half steps are set up.
I just I don't agree with this. Now,
look. Everything else aside, you could try to
argue that maybe he doesn't agree with that.
The problem, guys, is that you know he
does. You've heard him say these things, and
now here we are.
That this is my point as always. You'll
never allow me to think that
compromise in politics is a dirty word. I've
said that for the longest time. Not everywhere.
Compromise is important in life. But in this
case, I I I I'm kinda saying to
make a point. I'm sure there's examples you
could make. My point is that you see
all the time where we play that they
play the card. Well, oh, well, we have
to you know, instead of doing what they
know is right, they play it in the
middle somehow. And they go we all go,
well, that's politics.
That seems
I mean, again, you could make a point
where that might make sense. Like this is
not one of them.
Here is Sasha Latipova. She says, Eugenics for
dummies in a thread.
Until yesterday, and this is actually pretty important
to hear. She She says until yesterday, and
this was posted on the twenty eighth, I
still had hope in the integrity
of at least some individuals in power at
HHS.
Unfortunately,
I had to give up that hope after
this video was posted. You see, these are
people that have principles.
That there there's not you even if you
you I mean,
you could argue that he just doesn't do
this for nefarious reasons.
I would argue if whether she thought that
or not, the line would still be drawn.
These are deadly. No one should touch them.
And if you come out and say some
should take them, that's a problem. That's wrong.
We disagree with that. So I just respect
people like that that have made their point
a long time ago and aren't just equivocating
now because somebody else is in power, which
is effing everywhere.
And she says
after they posted this. And it says, as
of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children
and healthy pregnant women has been removed from
the recommended CDC utilization schedule. Oh, so that
I get it. That's why Denny Rancou is
framing it as non healthy. So you're saying
they can have it. No. I I was
wrong. Just thinking about it in my head
out loud. Denny Rancou was making the right
point. They were basically saying that these at
risk people should take it. At the same
point, they're bad for everybody, especially those with
immune compromised issues, especially
for pregnant women. It's like the most the,
like, the most at risk. And they're given
it just doesn't make any sense. But she
goes on to say, I would have been
running circles
and popping champagne
with all the other freedom fighters except
I have a character flaw. She says, I
don't digest my own brain after my team
won the elections and got into positions of
power. I trust but verify. And I verify
statements from my team even harder.
That is why I respect her so much.
That's what everyone should do. Don't you don't
give your people a pass. You hold them
to an even higher standard because you believe
in them. And she said, that's because I
expect lies from my enemies all day long
as per for the core as par for
the course. But when my friends are lying
to me, as brazenly as it is happening
here,
that's a much bigger problem. So before reaching
for that special vintage Dom Perron, I verified
the statements of RFK Junior, et al, and
Dom goes back into the cellar. As of
today, the shots for all babies 15,
not just unhealthy ones, are firmly
on the schedule.
So this is the problem. Now this is
a hard thing right now.
The the reason I I played it out
like this, you I you could argue that
this is going to catch up with what
they said.
See, for me, the fact that he stood
up and said, as of right now, we
are no longer that will have the effect
in people's minds that want to, that choose
to you know, that wanna take their you
know, there are people that disagree with him
that will choose not to. My point is
this is what I find most interesting. And
as of over the next few days, if
this does not change,
then it's what we always said. They'll come
out and say, we're doing this, and everyone
cheers, and then it doesn't actually happen. I'm
surprised if that happens because of how they
know we're paying attention. But I'm telling you
guys, it feels like there's something very wrong
happening, and it has been for a long
time. And she says that squares
squares it for either healthy or unhealthy children.
The CDC schedule is the source of for
all or you could also argue, maybe the
CDC decided not to do it yet. So
time is necessary here to understand whether because
and we're talking about, like, yet today. Right?
So whether or not that changes over the
next couple days will will mean a lot,
and we will follow-up on that.
The CDC's schedule is for the source of
all the state and local mandates and other
forms of injection coercion or it and it
doesn't matter what RFK Jr said on Twitter.
I mean, I I argue it does. It
does have an effect on people, especially there's
the people on their political side. But he
she's right. It's not official because he says
it online. The CDC is the source of
what doctors and OB GYNs follow for lying
and coercing their patients into poison injections.
Interestingly,
in this relationship, the HHS is the is
paying
the paying party that provides lubrication for CDC
policies and financial incentives to the doctors to
get every single child and pregnant woman in
their care injected. Nobody mentioned this curious arrangement,
nor any plans to dismantle or modify it
in any way. This is how the SIOP
is played.
RFK Jr, stuff on Twitter. Maha crowd goes
wild and cheer because none of them bother
to check his statements.
CDC totally disregards what RFK just said. Now,
again, I would add that that doesn't mean
that he can't force it into happening. He
is, technically above them. So, realistically, he could
force that into reality, I would argue. So
that's why I'm giving it a couple of
days to see how it plays out. HHS
pays to enforce the CDC schedule and not
what RFK Jr said on Twitter.
Now the rest you could read further for
yourself, but we'll follow-up on this. I think
it's very important to understand that this might
not be going the way that it appears.
Now Mary Talley Bowden, MD,
in the same response says, this a step
in the right direction if it does in
fact happen. Now use that pen to pull
them off the market.
I've already talked to two injured patients
this morning, she says. You see? Because they're
still using them
because Trump says to.
And she goes, COVID is a is a
cold. No one should get these shots.
They people with integrity. Now you can disagree
with her, but she has held that line
because she believes in it. There's far too
many people that are equivocating every day because
of some new political agenda,
as she'll tell you right now.
Here's what she said, which I found very
interesting. Oh, I think it was
oh, it is right here. Okay. So she
says, fourteen percent of my clinic patients today
came to see me for a vaccine injury.
Fourteen percent.
Every day she faces it, she said. Someone
called me today asking for me to be
a team player.
I will not back down until something is
done.
Think about that.
And Katherine Austin Fitts says, since when did
it become socially acceptable
to ask people to be a team player
by becoming an accomplished to murder and maiming?
Not to mention medical induced bankruptcy.
See, the point is, like the cat turds
and the rest of them out there, they
will attack people for pulling away from the
Trump agenda.
That's why my point is it's Trump first,
not America First for these people.
So if you know this is dangerous and
you're going, come on, Tali, just stop calling
it out for now until we get what
we want from it. You're asking her to
pull a punch that kills children so you
could benefit from it.
Maybe you're okay with that. Frankly, I think
that's disgusting.
Oh, oh, see, I just had it at
the end. That's what I do all the
time. Elon said, this is wrong spot for
this. I'm just gonna close it. It's about
it's the bot one I told you. I'll
put it at the bottom if you can
see
it. I just simply said, you know better
than anyone, and I posted all the bots.
He says, how many real people still on
the Internet?
It's just so typical how they do this
in NART and Mario. A AI bot runs
the Internet now. Yeah. Way to way to
jump on the bandwagon, guys. It's an old
conversation and it's clearly important now. But now
it's like, look at we're calling out the
thing that we're doing. Right? So it looks
like we're not doing the thing we're doing.
Typical.
That's how that's how I see it anyway.
Oops.
That was weird. Whole thing just froze there
for a second. Alright.
So continuing.
Let's talk about censorship
and the overlapping point in all of this,
how insane it is to be going. You
know, you can see a a Twitter,
Elon Musk or whatever else, Meta and Facebook
and Google, whatever else is going on out
there. All of them literally censoring for the
same reasons for the same people and just
have a different flavor.
And it's just it's I mean, are we
really gonna pretend like we haven't just seen
the blatant continuation of censorship on Twitter? Are
we still screaming for absolute free speech? Or
we just recognize how dumb it is to
say that today for that platform, for that
person? I mean, it's just it's just sad
how clear it is. And so what we're
gonna see now is an insane
I don't know. What do you call it?
A head fake?
A I mean, it's what I was just
talking about. Where so you got the US
government, Rubio and Trump in particular, because that's
the current administration,
just blatantly
going after people for speech, being called out
for it on their own platforms. I mean,
or on their own, you know, on Fox,
on CNN, or at least engaging with that.
You know, don't you think, is that just
about speech? Well, how can you what evidence
do you have to prove any support for
Hamas? Well, you saw them out there protesting,
and you saw them closing the libraries. I'll
play the clip for you. It's like, that's
not material support. In fact, that's just more
speed. It's crazy how they are just tripling
down on the very idea
that you're not allowed to say things about
Israel, but they're not saying it like that.
At the same time, as they are censoring,
as Twitter is censoring, as they are arresting
people and borderline deporting Americans
for speech about Israel or specifically visa holders
who are not breaking any laws, not criminals,
no criminal record here legally, Khalil, Khalil, Ozturk,
and it goes on.
So what's crazy is in the midst of
all of that, here's secretary Rubio, who I'm
beginning to think is quite clearly the set
it up he's being set up to be
the scapegoat. That's what I think. And I've
been pretty on par about that. I think
we can all see that Fauci is at
least being thrown under the bus in a
lot of ways. I don't think we're even
gonna see them get taken, like, whether they're
gonna be the scapegoat of the past anymore
or ever go to jail, but maybe that
doesn't happen anymore in the technocratic Zionist future.
But we saw that with Fauci. We saw
that with, what was the last one we
talked about?
What was the scapegoat? I forget now. I
mean, even Klaus in a way was kind
of used. The point is that I get
that sense from him. He does seem like
the one that would be used. And now
Trump's given him, like, three different positions in
making him speak all the time.
Starting to feel that way. My point is,
here's what he just had to say today,
and this is embarrassing. He says for far
for too long, Americans have been fined,
harassed,
and even charged by foreign authorities
for exercising their free speech rights.
I'm sure you can imagine the authority from
a foreign place that he's not talking about
because that will never come into play. He
says, today, I'm announcing a new visa restriction
policy
that will apply to foreign officials
and persons who are complicit in censoring Americans?
Well, first of all, I think it's an
interesting point. Even a diplomat does have a
visa overlap, but it's not the same thing
as saying somebody with diplomatic immunity and on
on an official
diplomatic mission
is necessarily someone's visa you can just yank.
I find that interesting. There is a difference.
It is still in the same wheelhouse.
So my point is he wants you to
be thinking about this in the context of
the larger immigration conversation and visas they can
just pull. But he goes, my new visa
restriction policy
that will apply to foreign officials,
you know, so a government member of Iran,
a government member
of The UK, which is really what the
one of the main parts that kinda be
seems to be focused on. But at the
same time, who is the entities and of
a foreign national government that are actively calling
for censorship of Americans? And I don't mean
passively. I mean, actively going censor what they're
saying,
Israel,
on a bombastic level
right now after the shooting of the embassy
people that ADL,
Greenblatt,
I mean, even Marco Rubio coming out and
going, we have to censor antisemitism.
So at the same exact moment he's telling
you to censor Americans, he's coming out and
saying, we have to stop those people from
censoring Americans.
Can you guess you know, can you can
you start to sense that he doesn't actually
care about censorship? It's about using this for
other political means. And he goes, and persons
who are complicit in censoring Americans.
Free speech is essential
to the American way of life, rings hollow
there, bud, A birthright over which foreign governments
have no authority.
Unless you're Israel. He says, foreigners who work
to undermine the rights of Americans should not
enjoy the privilege of traveling to our country.
Yeah. I I mean, I'm not necessarily disagreeing.
I just know, as a matter of fact,
this is only gonna be aimed at the
people you don't like. In fact, the people
that aren't actively doing that in a real
sense, but those that are, will get a
pass. Whether in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere.
The days of passive treatment for those who
work to undermine the rights of Americans are
over. I mean, just read the comments. I
mean, what the gall on this guy for
saying that now is
crazy.
I don't think, oh, I did say what
what a weak attempt to hide the most
obvious censorship effort underway in this country.
And that's the Zionist led censorship push being
facilitated by Rubio and the US government under
a guise of fighting antisemitism.
No one in the world is unaware of
that. Anyone wanna bet this will magically not
apply to Israelis?
Hey. Maybe they're gonna maybe the maybe it
will. Maybe this is the turning point. We
have seen the world start to shift. Maybe
they've recognized they can't keep doing it. And
I swear, I'd be happy to be wrong
if that was the case. I would love
to see them turn around and go, Israeli
government is censoring Americans. Wouldn't that be amazing
even if it's opportunism? Like I said, yes.
Because that will cause change even if it's
just for their benefit in the short term.
Don't trust them. Just recognize they rec they
see now the juice is not worth the
squeeze. I doubt that's what's gonna happen. People
like Rubio are long since bought out by
this foreign government.
Now Rubio issues policy against foreigners responsible for
censorship, and here's what The Hill wrote about
it.
Secretary Rubio announced a new visa restriction policy
Wednesday targeting foreign nationals
who are deemed responsible for censorship
of protected
expression.
Now what that means is not just necessarily,
you know, random person from foreign country. Obviously,
they have no ability to censor you. It's
about people with authority, people in positions of
government.
Right? So the it's a weird overlap to
say you're gonna yank the visa of a
foreign government official
because you claim they're censoring Americans, but in
what way? How are foreign government officials censoring
Americans?
Right? I mean, that you that we're gonna
get into what they're actually claiming
about The UK, for example,
and their bills that are saying that you
can't,
for for instance, use hate speech. And they
go, you have to censor that Twitter, which
is really what it's about.
Explain for me how in any real material
way that's different than censoring antisemitism.
I'd love to hear an answer for that.
You'll never get it. Of course, it's gonna
be, we have to defend our greatest ally.
It's not gonna be a real answer. It's
gonna be the same old talking points. Antisemitism,
hate speech, they're the same conversation.
Neither are legal. You're allowed to say and
think what you want,
except in these free speech places. Right?
Even as we take action to reject censorship
at home,
That's what he says. We see troubling instances
of foreign governments and foreign officials picking up
the slack. Is he really trying to frame
himself as the ones defending
free speech?
He goes, in some instances, foreign officials have
taken flagrant censorship actions against US tech companies.
Ah, he could care less about your speech.
He's defending tech companies. Probably some overlapping AI
agenda, probably some social engineering program they're trying
to push and it's being stopped or stifled
by their you know, the same thing happening
in The UK. They're bumping up against each
other. I I don't know.
It's weird though.
Foreign officials have taken flagrant censorship actions against
tech companies.
And it says,
US tech companies and US citizens and residents
win, they have no authority to do so.
Residents? Now you're defending US residents?
So visa holders?
I mean, I mean, I can't even you
have to laugh out loud that he has
the nerve
to say that he's standing up for people
with visas
against people trying to censor them. I mean,
it just can't what world are we living
in? But you got what else are you
gonna do? It's to say look. When I
started telling you that Israel was seen and
the world can see the genocide,
and that all they could do is just
start flailing and and you know?
For example,
they murder people, they're starving them to death,
and they go, no. There's more food than
ever. You know, my point is, like, well,
what else are they gonna do? They're not
gonna go, you got me. We're killing them
all. They're gonna lie until the end. Same
point.
That my point is to show you, one,
that they're lying, but two, that they're they're
they know you see them.
They you they can't they can't patch together
a better argument.
Or I guess the alternative is they wanna
make fun of you that they're trying to
upset you. That's certainly possible.
But he goes
he goes on to say, the state department
called it unacceptable to seek arrest warrants on
US citizens or residents over posts on US
social media platforms while on US soil.
Now, look, I I don't actually see the
building point he's making. I think this is
more of a side step about what they're
doing to gain some kind of a clout.
But I the argument being that there's bills
in The UK, for example, that are, you
know, on platforms that we are on as
well, where they can say that you're breaking
the law
over there with what you're posting here. Now
I don't see how that translates to you
being putting out a rest warrant for us.
Like, I get that. I don't see how
this actually puts Americans in any way, unless
you're in a foreign country, which then is
their prerogative.
So to me, it feels dishonest as hell
that he's simply trying to go bad. What
you're doing is wrong because we're the good
guy when it's just flimsy and nobody not
even your own followers believe that right now.
But it says, it is similarly unacceptable for
foreign officials to demand that America tech platforms,
this is what it comes down to, adopt
global content moderation policies or engage in censorship
activity that reaches beyond their authority. Oh, so
it's okay. We can censor, but not it's
not beyond your authority. And in The United
States. Well, the reality is he's talking about
Twitter, and Twitter has been actively censoring under
Garam at the time or The US lawsuit
proved.
I think it was over 90%, they said.
And I'll even show you another screenshot that
was way back when it first started showing
from from Grok, and I've I've talked about
it in the past. That's why I'm using
this tweet again to show you they might
might be right here. Yeah. He asked this
is Tiberius. He simply asked Grok, is censorship
worse since Musk took over? The answer was,
since he took over, the platform's approach to
censorship has been both praised and criticized leading
to a complex picture, increased compliance with government
requests.
Several reports suggest that Twitter has complied with
government requests for center content removal at a
higher rate than Musk's ownership before
before, you know, when Musk took over.
You could I mean, ask it now. Last
time we checked, the number was higher. They
admitted this in their own lawsuit. It didn't
get a large reach because the people that
supported it didn't want you to see it.
And, weirdly, the ones that are supposed to
be attacking and based on political sides didn't
care to call it out. Weird how that
seems to work when it's in the interest
of the two party illusion.
Always. But
the interesting overall here
is that he is still censoring. They are
actively doing so. So what's the real game
here? Is it just him trying to win
points to act like he's the good guy?
Are they trying to stop them from doing
something else with Twitter? Is there something you
know, I are they all vying for some
kind of overarching control with the new next
generation technocratic I I don't know. Something is
going on here and has nothing to do
with whether you're being censored.
And as soon, he goes on to say,
the new policy of the article says, the
new policy comes in the heels of a
feud between Twitter
and Musk, right,
between Elon Musk and Brazilian Supreme Court judge,
more, Alexander de Moras after the social media
platform was ordered to remove posts. So this
is fascinating to me. Do you realize they
removed endless amounts of posts for Turkey, for
India?
I mean, I'm I bet you I can
pull that one up. It's just the one
I remember.
Let's see.
Nope. It doesn't seem to come up.
Oh, well.
That's weird. What was that? Was it advice?
Oh, well. The point is you can look
this stuff up pretty regularly.
And it's I mean, it it just seems
pretty clear that they are actively complying with
government,
request to remove content they disagree with. And
Elon defends it on the platform. He goes,
well, we gotta follow the law. So I
think look. That's for you to decide if
you think that's wrong. That's certainly not absolute
free speech. That's clear.
But so this, why suddenly care there? Does
it have to do with Israel?
Probably.
Here
is the reality of, you know, the the
what so look at this way, a lot
of the bigger pictures. First of all, the
reality that we are being censored in active
ways right now. Antisemitism bills all across the
board. The point is that he's calling out
Brazil,
UK,
and making this big, sprawling statement about foreign
entities
manipulating in this country. And then all of
a sudden, we have the ADL, Greenblatt, Israel,
the the, you know, the entire Israeli government
openly calling for suppression of our speech in
this country, and you can't even mention that?
How is that not the most conspicuous thing
in the world?
As this person says, so much for free
markets, free speech, or freedom in general. Right?
The ADL is a far right org, and
it's time and it's time people recognize it
as such.
David Goldenberg calls for mass censorship, deplatforming, and
repealing section two thirty.
He's he they're going after that. I mean,
here what's crazy. He's literally pointing at platforms
and saying, censor these people, and he can't
even point to that. I mean, again, I
just have to say it again. How is
that not the most conspicuous thing in the
world? If there's ever been an example of
exactly what he just decided to stand on
a soapbox and scream about, it's right in
front of him, and he was pointing over
them and going, look at The UK.
It's embarrassing, guys. Everybody can see that.
Here's Glenn Greenwald. The ADL is already exploiting
the murder of two Israeli embassy staffers to
demand more limits on free speech that the
US government is happily complying with. Now here's
what Rubio actually had to say, and this
is this is how this is ludicrous.
Now this overlaps with
the immigration point. We're not gonna go into
much more today, tomorrow, like, I believe tomorrow.
I my calendar's not open. I'm I'm most
likely sure tomorrow.
Then I'll I'll go and do more on
that and Israel in particular as well. But
the idea that he can make these statements
still to this point about Hamas support, you
know, and, again, this is about free speech.
Right? So listen to the way he can't
he makes this point and ask yourself if
he could possibly mean what he just said
when this is his statement.
Ask you about a decision you made to
revoke a student visa for someone at Columbia
University this past week. The Wall Street Journal
editorial board writes, the administration needs to be
careful. It's targeting real promoters of terrorism, not
breaking the great promise of a green card
by deporting anyone with controversial
political views.
Can you substantiate
any form of material support for terrorism,
specifically to Hamas,
from this Columbia student, or was it simply
that he was espousing
a controversial political point of view? Now this
is the whole Andreessen point. I don't know.
They made it in the past. You know,
you just keep lying. You don't back down.
You know, that that's what they made this
point in the past. So if you what
she said, is there material support for Hamas?
Is there any evidence for the one thing
you keep claiming? And even as he's saying,
he's going yes. Yes. Yes. He says yes
three times before she even finishes the sentence.
But listen to how he responds.
We're not just the student. We're gonna do
more. In fact, we every day now, we're
approving visa revocations. And if that visa led
to a green card So his first response
is to pivot off and to say, we're
gonna keep doing it though. Not the question.
Green card process as well. And here's why.
It's very simple.
So now we pivot as to why they're
doing it. He's successfully step two take steps
away now from the real question.
Very obvious why. Apply to enter The United
States and you get a visa, you are
a guest. Ah. You're coming as a student.
You're coming as a tourist or what have
you. And in it, you have to make
certain assertations. And if you tell us, when
you apply for a visa, I'm coming to
The US
to participate in pro Hamas events. See, this
is this I mean, why doesn't he get
laughed off the programs with stuff like this?
It's in a logical statement. First of all,
you're gonna argue for that they somehow are
coming with this devious plot to go to
a protest, which, by the way, you're calling
pro Hamas, which we've all can prove to
this day. It's been pro Palestine, and you're
late. That's the best you can do.
But then, they're supposed to know in five
years I'm gonna go to a pro Palestine
protest and how that even if it was
pro Hamas, would in any way be illegal?
It's not. And it's not pro Hamas.
And so you're saying that they're supposed to
have written that down years ago when they
applied for a visa? The point is it's
irrelevant because you gave them a visa, and
now they're here. So if you're gonna make
an allegation that gave support for Hamas, you're
required to literally prove that like it would
be for an American. That's due process. That's
the only thing that matters in this. The
idea that you're somehow supposed to say that
because you're in this protest, we you lied
to us five years ago or ten years
ago or twenty years ago when you applied
for this thing is juvenile.
That's the best this little Marco Rubio can
do.
But he still hasn't answered the question, you
understand? That runs counter to the foreign policy
interest of The United States Of America. It's
that simple. The assumption, the blind assumption that
they are pro supporting Hamas, which, no, it
doesn't, first of all, seeing as how Israel
supports Hamas, and they're your chief ally. They
fund them right up until October 7. The
point though is about trying to deviate to,
you know, muddy the water.
They're a criminal somehow. Just accept that. That's
why we don't want them there even though
they didn't break the law. We didn't charge
them the crime.
Facts don't matter in this world. So you
lied. You came if you had told us
that you were gonna do that, we never
would have given you the visa. That's not
how it works, Marco. Like, this is the
most embarrassing thing in the world. That's not
how this works in any context. Let alone
you can somehow blame them for something they
didn't even do and assume that they were
supposed to tell you that they didn't that
they did the thing that they didn't even
do. Like, it's just it's based on a
complete illusion. Now you're here. Now you do
it. So you lied to us. You're out.
It's that simple. But but you see, even
in that context, he would still have to
prove they did it, which he didn't do.
Because first of all, they didn't do that,
but they would have to take them to
court and prove that they did do something
that would violate their visa. It's just this
roundabout circular broken logic, guys. That's why the
only people that are siding with them right
now are legitimately stupid. You can laugh at
these people online, still arguing that immigrants don't
have rights and so on. Like, they're they're
ridiculous. They're any but is there any evidence
of a link to terrorism or Same question.
See, he never even answered the question. Just
his point of view. Sure. Yes. Sure. Yes.
Again, three times. Here's his answer.
Yeah. They take over I mean, do not
I mean, you should watch the news.
Oh, wow. That was compelling. Great start, buddy.
Yeah. They took you should watch the news.
So the news is informing you about what
these people did to support Hamas? That doesn't
sound like an intelligence assessment. That doesn't sound
like actual evidence
because he doesn't have it. It's gonna be
very apparent.
What he's gonna go say is they lock
people in libraries and they did they didn't
do that though. What he's doing is generalizing
allegations that were levied at the entire Columbia
students, but that didn't even happen. I proved
I I broke it down when it happened.
The claim they locked people in a library
was widely broken down as a complete scam.
I I showed you the video from both
sides, which they didn't, which showed you that
nobody was trying to break in. It was
a video taken from within the hot library
trying to make it sound like they were
coming, and they weren't. There was a protest
going on outside. Or in any number of
ways, even if it was the case, Khalil
was not there, Osterc was not there, the
kid she's talking about was not there, not
in the context he's making. So you can
broaden it out and say these things happen.
Therefore, anybody anywhere that has a Palestinian flag
is now a Hamas supporter.
Even if you did prove that Kalia was
at that library, that does not amount in
any way she performed to material support for
Hamas.
This is the this is the one of
the most powerful people in the US government,
and that's the best this guy could do.
You don't you don't think that's desperation
or I guess just
hubris?
Sad. It really is.
Of a link to terrorism, or is it
just his point of view?
Yeah. They take over I mean, do you
not I mean, you should watch the news.
I mean, these guys take over entire buildings.
We could handle They vandalize colleges. Intense law.
Shut down asking about the They as a
broad sense. No. They didn't. The people we're
talking about did not. Well, then you should
know justification for the revocation of his visa.
Right. Was the one person we're discussing. Is
there any evidence that you spoke to? Was
the negotiator on me? What negotiating on behalf
of people that took over a campus? Oh,
so now we're talking about Khalil's a negotiator.
You know, the negotiator that was chosen by
both sides, including the college,
to be the mediator because he was respected
by all sides. And every single person involved,
including the school, including the Jewish people that
were there, have testified that he is adamant
actively
not in no way racist, in no way
promoting Hamas, is simply there to try to
find you know, was protesting in in regard
to finding peace for Palestine
and very actively fighting for peaceful solutions. And
you can look for yourself.
They lied about literally everything. That's why they
still don't have anything, and they're still trying
to put him in for deport him. They
have never charged him with a crime.
They're just simply penalizing people for speech.
If that's not apparent to you by now,
you're either a blindly partisan person or maybe
you're illiterate. I don't know. But what he's
doing right there has nothing to do with
anything other than he did this and we
don't like that and he said that. That's
childish. We're in kindergarten. That's little Marco Rubio.
That vandalized buildings? Negotiating over what? That's a
crime in and of itself that they're involved
in the being a negotiator, the spokesperson, this,
that, the other. Well, you gotta you gotta
listen to that all the way through.
He's and, usually, he's better than this. He
he he's stumbling, and it's embarrassing. I mean,
do you not I mean, you should watch
the news. These guys take over entire buildings.
They vandalize colleges. They shut down I'm asking
about this. Then you should know. Justification for
the revocation of his visa. Was there any
evidence material spoken to us? Was the negotiator
on negotiating on behalf of people that took
over a campus that vandalized buildings? Negotiating over
what? That's a crime in and of itself
that they're involved in the meeting of the
negotiator, the spokesperson, this, that, the other. We
don't Wow.
So now you're you're claiming that
being a spokesperson person for a mediation between
the school and a protest, which by the
way is legal,
amounts to material support for Hamas?
That's really stupid.
Now that's technically not even what like, that's
what she's asking, and his answer would imply
that's what he meant. He's not he's just
he's using subjective sidestep emotional arguments. Well, he's
pro it's like saying he can't be father
of the year if he got a traffic
ticket. Well, does that have anything to do
with whether he's part of the gang? No.
No. But we can continue to give you
subjective nonsensical reasons to assume he's a bad
guy, which then, therefore, makes it easier to
blindly accept he is a gang member without
any evidence.
That's not like an accidental thing. That's what
these people are doing. Human be human beings
with families
that have nothing, like, what no evidence whatsoever
to back up what they're saying. I mean,
even Garcia
has somewhat some level of background that allows
people to think that he might be a
bad guy, none of which backs up the
claim. Khalil is the it's like a textbook
example of a of a pillar of the
community.
I mean, guys, look for yourself. The only
thing they have is a bunch of narrative
that has roundly fallen on its on its
face, and yet idiots like this will still
say it, and it will spring back up
through the conversation by other idiots online. It
never stops. But if your only argument is
that he was
a mediator
for an ongoing conversation, then you're just exposed
yourself as a liar. I wanna we don't
need these people in our country that we
never should have allowed them in in the
first place. If he Back to the same
emotional response. It's not answering the question. He
had told us, I'm going over there, and
I'm going over there to become the spokesperson
and one of the leaders of a movement
that's gonna turn one of your allegedly elite
colleges upside down.
Wow. Not a strike point.
So you're telling me that he mapped out
that he was gonna go to the college
to become a mediator for a protest that
hadn't happened yet in support of
I mean, think about how abstract that is,
that he's supposed to know this or he
planned it out, and especially since you understand
he's chosen by all the sides to bring
a, you know, a a res resolution to
the conversation.
How is that violent? How is it any
way is that he's trying to work this
into the argument that because he did that
for both sides, therefore, he is Hamas? Therefore,
he knew he was gonna do some evil
terrorist thing. Give me an example of any
crime of any anything other than your
misframing
of things that are benign.
That's I mean, think about how terrifying that
is for people that he's focusing on. And
now they float that Americans are next. This
is chilling. People can't even go to school,
library buildings being vandalized. We never would've let
them in. Can't go to school.
I mean, you realize that this is like
them saying 40% of babies at this point,
guys. That's embarrassing. These things were
completely manufactured.
That's not the same as saying there's no
antisemitism, no racism, but we can prove this.
It's been broken down a hundred different ways,
like a flag and being stabbed in the
eye, and then everyone reported that until it
turned out that it was not even remotely
true. Or Stefanik claiming they were chanting, Mark,
kill all the Jews until the police officer
in congress said that never happened, and yet
she still kept saying it.
You don't see what's going on here, guys?
Hopefully, if you're new to the show, you're
beginning to recognize a blind adherence
to whatever Israel wants to accomplish at the
expense of Americans.
You don't think that dovetails with AI and
social media and everything else? Never would have
let him in to begin with. And now
that he's doing it and he's here, he's
going to leave and so are others, and
we're gonna keep doing it. We're and by
the way, I find it ironic that a
lot of these people out there defending the
first amendment speech
alleged free speech rights of these Hamas sympathizers.
Oh oh, now it's alleged free speech rights.
Are you claiming that they never had them
because I mean,
again, this is the absurd argument.
If they're in this country, they have free
speech rights.
So he's just sending a legend, which makes
other idiots online then become begin arguing if
they don't have it in the first place.
You know, it becomes the double argument as
always. We didn't censor them, but if they
did, they wouldn't have the right anyway. It's
like, okay. You guys are lazy. Obviously, they
have free speech rights, and, obviously, you're suppressing
those. That's why he has to make a
sound alleged because he knows what he's doing.
They know what they're doing.
So are others, and we're gonna keep doing
it. We are and by the way, I
find it ironic that a lot of these
people out there defending the first amendment speech
alleged free speech rights of these Hamas sympathizers
Hamas sympathizers. They had no problem,
okay, pressuring social media to censor American political
speech.
Okay. So now you did it first.
See, that that's the last message for lazy
arguer. Like, okay. So you did it first.
Therefore, it's okay that I do the thing
that I'm also telling you I never did.
Every single time. That's that's Zionist propaganda for
you right there. You can't come out and
argue you didn't do a thing and then
argue why it's okay that you did it.
That's stupid.
I mean, really absorb that, guys. That's a
that is a desperate person lost. You don't
have an argument.
Okay. Pressuring social media to censor American political
speech. So it's I think it's ironic and
hypocritical. But What the argument being that literally
every American did that? Okay. How about this,
Rubio? What about the ones that didn't do
that? Can they call you a censor? Can
they say you're censoring?
I mean, you can't say everyone everywhere was
on the same board. Your your mindset is
that it was only democrats most likely. So
what about all the republicans are calling you
out right now for censoring these people, whether
or not they agree with the immigration agenda?
These are broad stroke, lowest common denominator arguments
that are meant to rally up the dumbest
people in the conversation. That's what they're doing.
It's desperate.
Dang it.
So it's I think it's ironic and hypocritical,
but the bottom line is this. If you
are in this country to promote Hamas, to
promote terrorist organizations, to participate in vandalism, to
participate in acts of rebellion and riots Many
of those would be crimes, and you could
be charged for those crimes. That's it.
To argue that you might do that based
on words is censorship.
The campus, we never would have let you
in if we had known that. And now
that we know you're gonna be Palestinian
people who are gonna have their visas remote
provoked or other points of view as well?
No. I think anybody who's here in favor,
but we wanna get rid of Trinidad and
Agua gang members. That was very close.
Now, honestly, she could have asked a much
better question, and I think it's obvious to
me the two party illusion is playing their
part in all this.
Because, I mean, you could ask a hundred
questions right now if you like I'm doing,
that would make him put him on the
spot. I asked you very clearly about material
support for Hamas. You have not said a
thing yet. You've been tap dancing in every
direction about emotional arguments. What was the material
support for Hamas? That'll be a real journalist.
That's not what these people are.
Nonetheless, though, she has something that at least
somewhat makes a point. And he almost says
yes in regard to Palestine and then realizes
that. Gonna have their visas remote provoked or
other points of view as well. No. I
think anybody who's here in favor, but we
wanna get rid of train dot agua gang
members. They're terrorists too. I we the president
designated them, asked me to designate, and I
did as a terrorist organization. We wanna get
rid of them as well. You're we don't
want terrorists in America. I don't know how
hard that is to understand. We want peep
we don't want people in our country that
are gonna be committing crimes. Right. So when
they told you that you're wearing a red
hat made you a terrorist,
don't forget that. Right? For all those that
are going, yeah. These are all immigrant terrorists,
and then blindly allowing your government to point
to who they want and get rid of
them, you're the same thing. You are the
Democrats you hate. You are exactly the same
thing. The same reason I mean, imagine it
was Biden before and saying you have a
red hat. You need to be removed from
the country or put in prison because you're
a terrorist.
Domestic terrorism, guys. The same thing built to
where we are now. It is also still
aimed at you and you don't even realize.
Just recognize that that's the same conversation. If
you were unhappy about being called a terrorist
because of an arbitrary thing you were doing
that had no real proof to being terror,
then you should care about this. And don't
be swayed away from caring about it because
you're told you're not supposed to care about
Democrats. That's childish.
Undermining our national security or the public safety.
It's that simple. Especially people that are here
as guests. That is what a visa is.
I don't know where we've gotten it in
our head that a visa is some sort
of birthright. It is not. No one thinks
that. Visitor to our country. And if you
violate the terms of your visitation, you are
going to leave. Yeah. As long as you
can prove that, bud. If you can prove
they did so, I mean, that's the same
argument. So you're gonna come up and say,
you violated this. You're gone.
Could you be wrong? Or could you just
pretend that's the case assuming essentially, since your
people seem to want you to be able
to do that without ever proving it because
you're an immigrant, so how long until you
start just going, that's the case, without proving
it and sending whoever you want because of
maybe they supported Israel or maybe called out
Israel rather? I mean, it's just so obvious
how subjective it is.
Find your principles. Stand up for what's right
regardless of the partisan game that's being played.
The idea of what he's saying there
at the end here in our head that
a visa is some sort of birthright. People
might think that if they're also stupid. People
that have bought into the other side of
the narrative, which is just as stupid in
this conversation. The reality is clearly that these
things are
the
rather the best way to say it. Your
constitutional rights apply
whether you're an illegal immigrant,
whether you are Visa green card or American
citizen. If you still don't know that, I
feel bad for you because it's easily look.
You could look it up right now.
Ask rock if you want, if that somehow
makes it make more sense for you. It'll
also tell you that.
Here he is. Right? So remember the conversation
of him telling you we're gonna stop all
the foreign people from trying to censor you.
Right? Unless they're Israel, of course. Here's what
he says about antisemitism.
Alright. Oh, that's right. I'm not gonna play
this one. It just simply says there can
be no compromise
with antisemitism.
You know, so words,
which that means he's censoring speech. That means
he is a hypocrite. But on top of
that, realize that you can save free Palestine,
and who called it antisemitism?
You know? And how long until whatever how
long until your red hat yet again becomes
antisemitism?
And then all of a sudden, now you're
part of the problem. The point is it's
subjective and you know that.
Torah Jews,
a Orthodox Jewish community says, isn't the very
isn't the very conflation of Jews with a
foreign entity
Israel the root cause of the antisemitism increase?
Yes. Because they understand the real game is
being played. This is why is it being
glossed over?
Because he's not honest. Because these are liars,
and they're acting for a foreign country. Open
source intel said this is what Marco Rubio
said. The slogan, free Palestine, is a rallying
cry for the murder of Jews.
That's what this idiot is saying. That's what
that's what that's the same as saying it's
the new Heil Hitler.
You're just falling into the new trap. It's
the it's yet another manipulation. I could I
could play 17 videos in a row with
people from the IDF, foreign holocausts or foreign
Holocaust survivors, Israelis, people around the world that
have told you they use this to censor
people.
He says when the murderer
was arrested after murdering two innocent people he
thought were Jews, he proudly shouted free Palestine.
And guess what?
He is talking about a Jew and a
Christian.
You see, the facts don't matter to little
Marco Rubio. It's only about adhering to people
that control him. It was a Christian Zionist
and a woman that was a Jewish person.
That is what happened there.
But see, they quoted him, and they later
and JD Vance did the same thing. They
edited their tweets and changed it.
So the point is they knew their marching
orders. They knew the way they were supposed
to respond to the event before the event
even played out. How does that not show
you what's going on? How does that not
show you who, in fact, is influencing, if
not controlling,
who these people are?
I'll yet again include the long thread of
different videos from Donald Trump before the selection
process openly telling you that he's gonna censor
for Israel
in in 16 different ways, showing you that
he said he's gonna censor this, he's gonna
censor that, he's gonna stop you from doing
it all around Israel, whether saying I'm gonna
get rid of the Jew haters, which is
just an idea, even though we know that
they're calling that to be anybody with a
Palestinian flag, Or, I mean, you on and
on. Or the clip saying he that Israel
is supposed to control congress. If you haven't
heard it, it's in his own words right
in front of you. I've played it a
thousand times. Problem is people just don't want
to see it.
Now Thomas Massie tweeted yesterday, if we're going
to have campaign disclosure laws at all, the
paid grifters on x and other platforms
should be required
to disclose who's paying them to influence elections.
That's a pretty interesting statement. And he goes,
appreciate the grifters and grifter sock puppets accounts
outing themselves in the comments below. See, because
all of a sudden, because of the idiots,
like, captured out there, Massey, pretty much the
only American first politician out there, one of
the, you know, people that you could see
in that general direction well beyond anybody in
the left right paradigm,
all suddenly calling him a traitor. A communist
traitor. Why? Because Trump didn't like being told
he was wrong about the bill. Now that's
what's so funny about this. Massey didn't come
out and say Trump's an idiot. The bill
the big beautiful bill is gonna do the
opposite. He didn't know what he's talking about.
Nobody came out and said, I have an
opinion about this.
I think this is the wrong direction. I
think this is gonna increase the debt. Be
the this is what there's
you're not allowed that's the Trump first versus
America First. He's not calling him out. He's
simply having a different opinion. Is he not
afforded to have an opinion against the current
Trump machine?
I mean, think about that. And instead, when
when it got asked in front of him,
Trump said, oh, he's a grandstander. He doesn't
really know what he's doing, and everyone knows
that.
The infant in the room, the insecure infant
in the room, full of hubris, this is
how so I mean, that that's look. I
can criticize.
You understand out there that it's not a
partisan thing for me. I think Biden's a
senile idiot. I think Trump is a is
a hubris packed child the way he acts.
It's things like this that show you that.
He I mean, how can you act that
way, especially when you know that most of
your base really supports Thomas Massie?
Because you're insecure, because you can't allow a
moment of deviation. Maybe it's because he sees
that things are shifting. I don't know. But
the point here is he says we're going
to have if we're gonna do this, we
have to expose all of this. People that
are grifting on Twitter to manipulate the outcome
of yeah. That's really happening. But that segues,
and maybe that's why he posted this yesterday
into this conversation.
Now this is very interesting to me. Lina
writes this, and we're gonna come back to
the doc the documents. First, why does Israeli
government have US media contracts?
You'll see that they we'll go over the
actual documents. It's
CNN, New York Post, Fox News, Daily Mail,
Daily Wire.
It's nonpartisan
is the point.
Overlaps with the Trump administration, overlaps with two
different media groups that I think are very
influent right. You know, it's showing you one
quick spotlight to the larger Israeli influence over
media policy, politicians,
everything.
Before we go there,
I wanna start with an article from 2024
from August. You might have seen this from
The Cradle. The Guardian put something out about
this. I'll also include the article Li Fang
put out with,
Jackson Polson about this conversation. They just had
some of the links that I grabbed that
I couldn't find anywhere else. I wanna include
that.
But it says Israel sought to bypass foreign
agent law, the FAR act, to spread propaganda
in The United States.
So
it's being revealed or was revealed that they
tried to figure out how to bypass that.
Interesting timing. Right? Right before now,
last year in August, they were trying to
figure out a way to not be seen
for this. Think about how relevant that is
to what's currently happening and what I think
is actually going on. So let's read through
this.
One let me, grab one thing really quickly.
I may play.
And should we play this, and I'll,
play this as well. This is worth this
is worth hearing. And this is about the
influence
from the government perspective in intelligence.
How fluid the violence is. There have been
assassination
attempts on Trump.
By the time this interview is being broadcast,
who knows what else will have been
going on by the military industrial complex to
prevent the Trump
administration or by the Israelis to prevent Harris.
Who knows? But you've written about unit a
two hundred.
That's Israeli SIGINT,
national,
units. I mean, I've there have been claims
that Lebanese resistance have bombed them, actually, in
the past few days. How it uses the
National Security Agency, which, of course, Edward Snowden
showed,
was used routinely
to surveil mass surveillance.
Snowden, of course, now in Moscow after seeking
asylum.
I mean, how is Israeli intelligence
embedded within
the firmament of US intelligence, and could it
be used to manipulate tomorrow's elections?
Well, the unit eighty two hundred is extremely
powerful. It's about the same as the NSA,
the National Security Agency. I've done three books
on NSA, so
I'm fairly familiar with that. And I was,
I think, the first person to interview Ed
Snowden in Moscow for
Wired magazine.
And when I talked to him, he he
was adamant that there was a great deal
of cooperation between The United States and and
Israel Eighty Two, unit eighty two hundred. The
relationship between NSA and and unit eighty two
hundred is the closest relationship,
foreign relationship that NSA has.
And they, the NSA has a a a
liaison officer embedded with unit eighty two hundred,
and unit unit eighty two hundred has a
liaison officer embedded right at Fort, Mead, where
NSA is headquartered.
So there's enormous cooperation. And what the documents
that came from Snowden showed was that the
Israelis were pressing,
NSA to get actual location,
geolocation
of people that they were attempting to assassinate.
The liaison officer NSA liaison officer pushed back
saying that under US law, we're not allowed
to give you information that will allow you
to assassinate somebody. And then another document came
back saying that the, Israeli eighty two hundred
had worked out,
some kind of a, cooperative agreement with,
the NSA to sort of overcome that problem.
Oh, well, gee. You can only imagine and
this is not a brand new clip. You
can only imagine what that would mean for
the most Zionist administration in history. How long
until you suddenly become on the, you know,
the chopping block as it were? In other
words, basically, NSA gave them the information they
needed to help with the assassinations,
and that probably is still going on today
with
the assassinations that have been taking place this
past summer.
Yep.
Very interesting.
So we'll come back to these documents. Let's
go through this first.
Right? Keeping this in mind and how obvious
it is that Israel has been building its
presence in this country.
The cradle writes, the Israeli government sought legal
advice on how to bypass US federal law
governing the spreading
US population by foreign states. Funny how
Rubio makes this statement. And, you know, it's
just it's so embarrassing that they think you
can't see right through that. He said, an
investigation published, on August 17 by The Guardian
in collaboration with Li Fang and Jack Paulson,
the the,
article we already showed you. US federal law
requires the disclosure of foreign backed lobbying campaigns,
but leaked documents reviewed by The Guardian show
the Israeli government sought legal advice concerning a
law out of concern that Jewish and Christian
Zionists lobbying groups
working in coordination with the Israeli government would
be required to register as foreign agents and
disclose their ties to Israel. Now here's the
thing. They know that.
As I said, going back to JFK, FARA
Act, or rather specifically, APAC,
or many other examples beyond that. So this
is not about them suddenly realizing this. I
think the point is why suddenly now?
You know, like, what what what was about
to be done? What was gonna happen? What's
the coming agenda that made you kinda go,
okay, we gotta get ahead of this? We
know this is accusation's gonna come into play.
How do we get ahead of this now?
Why, you know, why
why now is the point.
Because they've always seen it. They've always known
that. That's what's relevant to ask. The documents
which include emails and legal memos originating from
the hack of the Israeli Justice Ministry show
that Israeli officials proposed creating a new US
nonprofit
in order to continue Israel's activities in The
US while avoiding scrutiny under the law. You
see, they know people know what APAC is.
They know we know what the ADL that
that this is about trying to create a
US entity, which is not a US entity
rather and that's actually we'll come back to
things like this.
That's exactly the point of that Whitney wrote
this article for TLV back in 2023,
the prince and the spy.
The point was Erik Prince being used essentially
by the Israeli entities as sort of the
foot in the door as The US entity
to make it arguably not a foreign government
dynamic.
That's how that's also used. Or the idea
that they use unit a 300 to basically
position themselves in businesses they start and pretend
that those aren't intelligence.
It's all very public, guys. It's insane how
clear this is. So the point
here,
Li Fang and Jack Polson write a legal
strategy memo dated July 2018,
noted that compliance with the Foreign Agents Registration
Act would damage the reputation of several American
groups that receive funding and direction for Israel
and force them to meet all onerous transparency
requirements.
A separate memo noted that donors would not
want to fund groups registered under FARA.
Now, my mind goes to
the upcoming Trump administration.
Knowing, in my opinion, that this was part
of the plan, you can disagree with that,
Saying, okay, well, we need to get ahead
of how much we are going to be
pulling these strings, if not basically taking control
of the US government
or whatever you wanna think about. It's where
my mind my mind goes. And then ask
yourself how relevant it is to come back
to the conversation of no ethics pledges.
Tell I'm I'm I knew this would be
more relevant than this is how I see
it anyway. The idea of that they're as
they said, maybe they're being influenced by a
foreign government.
Interesting.
So this is back in 02/2018
where they're going, like, we gotta get ahead
of this because things are coming in the
future, near future, where these might we need
might need to shift this. Now, this is
not unique to Trump, by the way. That's
the point. Biden
is the same thing.
See, if you're always out here thinking we're
taking a partisan line, you're gonna miss the
forest for the trees, guys. The point is
Biden's administration or the one before that or
the world before that were adherent to whatever
Israel was at least pressuring them to do.
It's not hard to see. My point is
that what we're seeing from Biden to now
is a rapid increase of the larger
US government, nonpartisan, great reset, technocratic, Zionist, globalist
type agenda. Seems pretty clear to me.
So ask yourself what they
saw coming down the pipeline.
Now it says the memo says the Israeli
government
was worried about Farah because it compels registrants
to to, quote, flag any piece of propaganda
that is distributed to two or more parties
in The US
with a disclaimer stating that it was delivered
by a foreign agent and this then submit
a copy of the propaganda to the US
Department of Justice within forty eight hours. See,
if they don't register, that means they can
dump as much propaganda in the hands of
whoever they want to and influence, pay,
bribe, whatever else, which they do anyway. To
prevent foreign registration and the stigma and scrutiny
associated with it, the legal adviser suggested channeling
funds through a third party US nonprofit.
Liat Glazer, a legal adviser to Israel's Ministry
of
Strategic Affairs, wrote that even though the news
the new US nonprofit would not be formally
managed from Israel,
quote, we will have means of supervision
and management
through grant making and informal coordination mechanisms such
as oral meetings and updates.
Please let that sink through. The Israeli government
saying, well, you know, we won't
we'll be in control.
It'll be a US nonprofit in every way
you can see, but we will be dictating
what happens. And if we are the ones
dictating it, then if we're registered as a
foreign agent, then that will end up
calling attention to this.
It's just it's deliberate
subversion, guys. It's right in front of you.
The Israeli government was specifically concerned that a
US based nonprofit
called Kala Shlomo, which translates to Solomon's ring
sling. Excuse me. Solomon's sling, would be forced
to register under FARA.
The group was formed in 02/2017
by Israel's Ministry Of St Of Strategic Affairs
to distribute Israeli propaganda,
rebranded as Concert
in 02/2018,
And then Voices of Israel in 2021,
interesting thing, the Voices of Israel, the group
focused on undermining the BDS movement,
a completely constitutional movement that they don't want
to happen, so same as always, which which
BDS movement, which leads boycott, divestment, and sanctions
campaigns against Israel and protest of its illegal
occupation of Palestine and apartheid laws.
Interesting to to set the tone with that,
to know where, you know, where we're coming
from with this. So here are the documents
you can read. Again,
it is in Hebrew, but the provable documentation
that you rarely get from this kind of
conversation, which is that they are on the
record openly telling us they wanna try to
circumvent,
subvert to get away from the far act
because they wanna spread propaganda.
Here,
well documented emails back and forth in the
same conversation, a list with don't with money
being paid out. Very real.
Israel feared legal trouble over US advocacy efforts,
leaked file suggests. I'll include all these for
you. So let's get back to the actual
documentation.
Again, keeping in mind the lack of ethics
pledges for this exact kind of overlap.
So thank you again to Lina. Not familiar
with the account, but this is where I
first saw it. Worth giving a shout out
to people that and, well, technically, thank you
to We Are All Palestine who tagged me,
but whoever showed it first, that's important to
me. So here is the Open Secrets website.
I just wanna make sure you guys see
that these are from 03/03/2025.
That's important. That's where these this is they're
and specifically in regard to Targeted Communications
Global
LLC.
The first one,
this is again, these are all this is
all under the FAR Act. Now, this is
posted, received
as of the you see the very top,
03/03/2025.
The name of the registrant. Now, the way
this works,
I can I don't have to read through
all this, but the bottom line is this
is basically a a a registration
form for people that have to register as
a foreign agent or groups or companies or
anything connected to that? So you're supposed to
basically, you fill this out and you and
you submit it to the government.
So these are officially submitted documents through the
FAR act. Exhibit a to registration statement pursuant
to the Foreign Reg Agents Registration Act.
So here it says
just being a skimmed issue that I wanna
point out. Okay. So
the name of the registrant, the person who's
filling it out, in this case, for the
company, Targeted Communications
Global LLC.
And guess who the foreign principle is?
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
So
you can't hide that the Israeli government is
a foreign actor. Right? So that that's the
point is this is something that in the
past was not necessarily highlighted. That we have
a the Israeli Foreign Ministry of Affairs
funding
directly
a communications
a targeted communications
global.
And we'll get get into the overlap here.
I mean, we're gonna get into the the
more specific tangent of the offshoot of that,
which are just once called targeted victory, and
these are about digital manipulation.
Country registration, Israel.
Sorry. My scroll is acting funny.
Okay. Scrolling down.
Katherine Reynolds is the name of this of
the one documented on this.
There's your signature.
I think there I think that was the
one point on this.
Make sure I'm not missing anything. I couldn't
highlight these.
Okay. Yeah. So this I did start with
this one. Okay. So at the bottom of
this one,
the names are important by the way as
well. So keep in mind who these are
and recognize that they are literally registering as
a foreign agent
or or the company through it, and she's
a part of the company.
So down here, they also include
Apex,
response to item 11 list. This is an
item 11 list. Prior to the date of
registration for this foreign principle,
has the registrant engaged in any registerable activities,
such as political activities
for this foreign principle?
So whether Kathleen has on behalf of the
company that's being guided by the Israeli foreign
ministry or by the ministry that they're acting
on behalf of,
what have they done is what it's asking.
If yes, describe in full the details of
these activities.
It says the response,
excuse me, should include, among other things, the
relations, interests, and policies sought to be influenced
and the means employed to achieve this purpose.
If the registrant arranged, sponsored, or delivered speeches,
lectures, social media, Internet, postings,
or media broadcasts,
give details as to dates, places of delivery,
names of speakers, and subject matter,
the response must also include, but not be
limited to, activities involving lobbying promotion, perception management,
public relations, economic development, and preparation and dissemination
of information materials.
Set forth the details of the registered political
activities below. And here's what you notice.
Danny Sanchez from CNN
through
email, got a media placement.
K? So that means funding
through the media for media placement, advertisement, propaganda,
news report.
Tom, as I've been showing you guys repeatedly,
the New York Post,
media placement.
Fox News, media placement. Daily Mail, it's all
the same. NBC, Fox News. NBC, Fox News.
New York Post.
Fox News Radio, Fox News Radio, Daily Wire,
CNN, Fox News,
MSNBC, Newsmax,
media placement.
So in case you're missing the point,
that means
that targeted communications global that is being directed
by the Israeli Ministry of Defense is basically
placing media inside the US government media apparatus.
Shouldn't be much of a bombshell.
Pretty sure it's pretty obvious today, but I
think that's pretty profound for people that don't
know this is happening. Here's another one. Specifically,
this one's name this person's name is Matthew
Gorman.
Provided
to DOJ under separate cover, the resident's address.
Occupation,
executive vice president of a company called Targeted
Victory.
Targeted Victory is a digital first agency on
the cutting edge of campaigns and communications.
K?
Let's look.
Guess what?
What is the name of the address the
prime it read the primary registry? And this
is why this had to be done. Targeted
Communications
Global.
Okay? So now you've got another tangential aspect
of this. You've got Matthew Gorman running Targeted
Victory, which is under the umbrella of Targeted
Communications Global, which is being funded and influenced
by Israel.
Right here. Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
That's pretty interesting, don't you think?
There's a few more things on this one.
Right here.
Look at that. Matthew Gorman.
Trump National Committee, JFC.
Credit card.
There's two of those listed under donors. It
said basically, it says, during the period beginning
of sixty days prior to the date of
your obligation,
have you, from your own funds and your
own behalf, either directly or through any other
person, made contributions of money? So, you know,
just that he is involved. I just think
that's interesting. I I don't think it's hard
it's to be clear, because somebody supports somebody
else does not therefore make them a criminal.
That's That's the very two party illusion thing
to do. It should be a data point
that you consider,
but guilt by association is not guilt. It's
possible.
This one, again, for targeted communications global. All
these are, and what you notice is they're
all from the third, but varying by by
minutes based on the postings.
04/07/1938,
'4 zero '7 '30 '1. See my point.
So it's all dumped as of recently in
March 2025.
So this one's in Arlington, Virginia, by the
way. Let's not forget how close you know,
there's very clear intelligence overlaps to that exact
location. Targeted communications global, being influenced by Israel,
Arlington, Virginia.
You know, doesn't it it could mean nothing,
but I think we all know it probably
doesn't.
Katherine Reynolds, the one we already showed you
before, right, was connected to the whole dynamic.
And this was
she provides public affairs and media consulting services.
Registerant is owned by Targeted Holdings LLC. So
it all connects to the same conversation, which
is subsidiary of Stagwell Marketing Communications LLC. Those
would be something we should look into.
Right here, provided DOJ
under separate cover. Matthew Gorman, Brian Martin Schmidt,
industry of foreign affairs,
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Provided media relations, counsel. So you just have
to understand, this is a foreign government
who is, in any in some cases, registering
that they're influencing, connecting
media placements,
funding people in the media, and we know
the government overlap.
Same place.
And then again, Matthew Gorman, Trump National Committee.
This one
oh, I think we already looked at this
one. Oh, no. This is the other one.
So same point, Brian Martin Schmidt
was one of the other elements in all
of this. And it's the same point.
Targeted communications global,
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. All these are
included for you to look for yourself.
Again, digital first agency on the cutting edge
of campaigns and communication. You know what that
means, propaganda.
Even if you think it's a positive thing,
and there's Stagwell, proud member of Stagwell Global.
Now, this will be something worth going through
more depth.
Include this as well
for
the receipt profile of Targeted Victory. And you
can this is what's interesting. So to make
the larger point at the end,
I think it's pretty clear that Targeted Victory
is an extension of the group that's being
influenced by the Israeli Foreign Ministry Affairs to
the point to where they had to register
under FARA. Okay?
Here, Targeted Victory,
not to be confused with targeted communications global,
which is not to be confused with Stagwell.
Like, that's how this works. Shell among shell
among shell. So making the point that targeted
victory is connected,
look at what they're doing.
This is just 2020. Look at this. National
Republican
Senatorial Committee, fifty million dollars National Republican
Congressional Committee, thirty five million dollars America First
Action, twenty five million dollars McConnell Senate, on
and on. Scalise, McCallie, Purdue. Look at all
this money they're throwing around. You don't you
you think that's accents? I mean, we already
know how much money. That's $237,000,000
just in 2020 from a group that I
think we can easily prove is tied back
to Israel.
Let's look at 2024.
Or even better yet, let's go back to
let's see.
Just trying to look at the overlap. I
mean, I it's it's always nonpartisan. If maybe
this is one aimed more so the Republicans,
I don't know. It does make sense with
the overlaps on America First stuff, but just
recognizing even 2024.
Dollars '15 million, National Republican Congressional Committee. You
don't think that has an influence on what
they decide to do?
To me, I think this is transparent.
I'll include it for you.
Now knowing that overlap and influence, whether it's
funding through media, government, or not, the outcome,
the social media,
the matter, the social engineering.
Prince and the Spy is a great article
for you to read on that very point,
but we've also referenced some others from Press
News, for example. This was a thread from
2024. Here's the actual article, revealed the Israeli
spies writing American news.
It's not new. And he goes this,
Alan McLeod goes and breaks this down piece
by piece, each individual. A new mint new
new Mint Press news investigation reveals that a
number of the most influential journalists in The
United States were previously operatives of the UN
eighty two hundred Israeli spy agency.
Imagine having this much evidence. I mean, provable
overlaps.
And so many people either are desperate to
not acknowledge it because they don't wanna be
called racist or are too afraid to call
it out
or are part of
it. Nonetheless, we all see it. That's my
point about all this. It can't be ignored
at this point.
Then there's this clip again. I might as
well play it since we you may have
missed it at the beginning. And this is
about specifically the NSA, you know, a 200,
the influence. I mean, it it is not
just politics, guys. This is an intelligence
invasion.
Because of how fluid the violence is, there
have been assassination attempts on Trump.
By the time this interview is being broadcast,
who knows what else will have
been going on by the military industrial complex
to prevent the Trump
administration
or by the Israelis to prevent Harris. Who
knows? But you've written about unit eight two
hundred.
That's Israeli SIGINT, national,
units. I mean, I've there have been claims
that Lebanese resistance have bombed them, actually, in
the past few days. How it uses the
National Security Agency, which, of course, Edward Snowden
showed
was used routinely
to surveil mass surveillance.
Snowden, of course, now in
Moscow after seeking asylum.
I mean, how is Israeli intelligence
embedded within
the firmament of US intelligence, and could it
be used to manipulate tomorrow's elections?
Well,
the unit eighty two hundred is extremely powerful.
It's about the same as the NSA, the
National Security Agency. I've done three books on
NSA, so
fairly familiar with that. And I was, I
think, the first person to interview Ed Snowden
in Moscow for
Wired magazine.
And when I talked to him, he he,
was adamant that there was a great deal
of cooperation between The United States and and
Israel eighty two, unit eighty two hundred.
The relationship between NSA and and unit eighty
two hundred is the closest relationship,
foreign relationship that NSA has.
And they, the NSA has a a a
liaison officer embedded with unit eighty two hundred,
and unit unit eighty two hundred has a
liaison officer embedded right at Fort,
Mead, where NSA is headquartered.
So there's enormous cooperation. And what the documents
that came from Snowden showed was that the
Israelis were pressing,
NSA to get actual location,
geolocation
of people that they were attempting to assassinate.
The liaison officer NSA liaison officer pushed back
saying that under US law, we're not allowed
to give you information that will allow you
to assassinate somebody.
And then another document came back saying that
the, Israeli eighty two hundred had worked out,
some kind of a, cooperative agreement with,
the NSA to sort of overcome that problem.
In other word, basically, NSA gave them the
information they needed to help with the assassinations,
and that probably is still going on today
with
the assassinations that have been taking place this
past summer.
Doesn't that seem concerning with the whole 02/2018
forward overlap we were just discussing of worrying
about how they were gonna be seen for
Farah in 2024
and, you know, there something has clearly shifted.
That's not just me pointing that out. Something's
different now. Maybe it's not, you know, maybe
it's in this bad direction we're worried about.
To make those points, Glenn Greenwald called us
out on the May 17. You'll never guess
which was the most visited country by members
of US congress in 2023. I'll give you
three guesses. You'll you'll never get it.
Of the trips, there were nine there of
the trips there, 90 were sponsored by organized
by and organized by APAC's educational program.
American and they'll forget what,
I'm blanking on his name all of a
sudden. Former CIA agent has said many times.
Almost had it.
Basically, you know, they they will harass and
and threaten and even attack American
agents that go to Israel. The told the
story about how they cut their dog's tail
off and wrapped it in gauze and left
it under the Christmas tree or whatever the
story. Like, it's just lunacy stuff or I
I think I'm conflating those. One was about
stealing the presents or the presents under the
tree, and then one was about leaving their
dog's chopped off tail like in any context.
That's sociopathic,
psychopathic level stuff. The point is they go
there
under manipulation,
a propagandized stuff, do their fake North Korea
tour kinda thing.
56
trips for Israel.
Hundred And Fifty Six.
Let's not forget, we already saw this. State
department revealed to be using Israeli
intelligence linked chat app involved in the Trump
in involved in a hack of the Trump
administration. Now here's how this went down.
It became the signal gate became the story,
which buried the reality that because he was
not using signal, he was using a app
made by Israeli intelligence that archives the signal
chat, which then got them hacked. You don't
think I mean, look. That's my opinion. That
was not anything but Israel. That's what we
watched. And that was Waltz, a blind Zionist
who was using an Israeli tech app that
had that allowed it all to happen. And
the story gets sidelined by the idea that
they were using signal and that signal signal
a signal gate.
That's a deliberate deviation by the media who's
supposed to be going after this administration. Make
sense of it for me.
You will if you understand the Israeli influence
over the whole damn conversation.
They're spying. They're influencing. They're manipulating outcomes. It's
everywhere you look, guys.
Dana McAdams says, which homeland is the Homeland
Security Secretary trying to secure here? Well, here
is any number of examples. Here's Kristi Noem
attending a memorial ceremony in Jerusalem honoring Yaron
Lechinsky and Sarah Milgum,
Israeli embassy staffers killed in a terror attack.
So she flies all the way to Israel
because of that. Cristiano,
the the secretary I mean, think about how
many different ways the America First administration has
actively done things at the for a foreign
government at the expense of Americans or focused
on policy for Israelis that it it has
nothing to do with Americans like Panbani doing
investigations of October 7. Explain these things to
me.
Here, Mike Lauer. It was a pleasure to
meet prime minister Netanyahu in Jerusalem.
Do they all fly to Jerusalem? I mean,
what is what is he even doing there
as a member of congress
to discuss regional security and our ironclad alliance?
What do you what do you have to
do with that? I mean, there are people
in positions of power, but the idea that
they should be so regularly flying to a
foreign government to discuss with this one head
of state.
How do we I mean, again, it's it's
it is it's almost like we don't need
to pretend like we anybody doesn't see this,
guys. That's strange.
It just is. And you could argue why,
but you have to acknowledge that that's weird
and how all of them go and basically
bow at the altar of Israel every single
time.
The US remains committed to Israel's defense as
we look forward. You mean the ongoing genocide
that the whole world can see that even
the corporate media has now shifted, but not
the bought off Zionist politicians?
Think about
that. Oh, yeah. Oops. Wrong one.
Let me go back. I think I wrote
something here, but I'm on might not be
able to go back.
Oh, yeah. So he just said, it's a
pleasure to meet Netanyahu
to discuss the security ironclad alliance. The US
remains committed to Israel's defense as we look
forward to diplomatic solutions for lasting peace. And
I said, correction. The US government is committed
to Israel's genocide. The American
people, not so much. Hashtag Israel First.
Here, prime minister of Israel says Benjamin Netanyahu
and his wife today met with senator Dave
McCormick
and his wife.
Okay? I don't even know who McCormick is.
Another Republican. Sure does not feel like America
First to me. Why the hell is this
happening?
I mean, you know why. I think we
just went through it today.
Then, of course, even worse, whether you agree
with all that or not, imagine having this
happen and then flocking to support that government
regardless on top of a genocide. So if
you didn't see this, and we will talk
about this more, as Mohammed Chiada points out.
So, basically, they've been developing into this situation
where they were trying to manufacture the ethnic
cleansing to a final degree. And so they've
been starving and murdering and displacing and torturing
and raping, all of which has been proven.
And every I mean, the the aid conversation
has been insulting from the very beginning. As
they were bombing trucks right in the beginning,
acting like it wasn't there, owning it until
it became a problem that he pretended like
it was Hamas, lying about it every time,
continue to lie about Hamas taking food, which
even the World Food Programme has spoken up
and said there's no evidence of that.
And so they manufacture this into driving them
in to one location. Argument the way argument
being that they were trying to shovel all
the people over to the South to be
able to then argue why they have to
move them all in one big swoop. It's
all cut it's exactly what we told you
was gonna happen.
The problem is that not only do they
not feed these people, they ended up shooting
at them. They ended up exactly what you'd
expect if you're even barely paying attention. Thousands
of starved Gazans stormed the dystopian Israeli American
aid complex in Rafa after being forced to
stand in endless queues and bake in the
sun in a fenced concentration camp. What they
called it a concentration camp. That's they called
it a concentrated I think I don't know
if you use camp, but it was concentrated
whatever. So that wasn't a term used by
accident.
And while being subjected to biometric surveillance, which
was also happening, which I've been trying to
tell you since the first couple months of
this,
Scanning their facial scan their buyer or iris
scans and their facial their, face print and
say having them sign documents that they'll forego
the right of return. That's what a lot
of this was all about. And that's that's
my point, guys. It's just been overlapped with
the global agenda from the beginning.
US Mercenaries and Israeli troops opening fire as
they're loading up. Now long story short, the
point is that they jammed them up in
this area. These people are starving to death.
That's not debatable. And then all of a
sudden, they weren't getting food. Nobody was allowed
through, and people got
restless,
desperate,
which was the re many of us before
this ever got to this point where we're
saying this is what they're gonna do. Like
the flower massacre, they drive them desperation that
blame them for why they're desperately trying to
seek food. Right? You bring in a truck
for a million people, and then you ask
why they're gonna scramble desperately to get to
it first. You know? And the point is
they've even lied about how it went down.
So this is first, the US Israeli backed
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation opened fire
on civilians
after losing control over its so called a
distribution point in West Rafa with armed personnel
responding by shooting instead of managing the crowd
properly.
The foundation accused of being political tool rather
than a relief entity, has no humanitarian track
record, and operates without transparency or regulation, which
is what they made the case. A lot
of other people wanna be involved and they
go, you're Hamas, and then they manufacture the
problem as usual. Despite repeated calls, Israel continues
to block established and legal aid agencies like
UNRWA and the World Food Programme
while claiming Hamas is doing it and everyone
knows they're not, from delivering assistance, obstructing organized
and safe humanitarian operations in Gaza. And not
only that, the food they're ending up with
is almost entirely with Hebrew writing from Israel.
So not only are they benefiting from their
starvation tactics by using their own resource, you
know, selling food to the to the people
then buy you know, the government program buying
it and selling it back to them. It's
disgusting. But they've manufactured this, and you can
look there for yourself.
Jerry Jeremy Scahill simply puts it this way.
He says, as the Israeli aid scheme staffed
by US Mercenaries begins in Gaza, there is
already a report of a Palestinian being kidnapped
when he went to get one of the
small boxes of food. His family says he
went to
Miraj Crossing, a distribution center. Quote, to our
shock, he called us under threat from Israeli
intelligence officers, demanding information about one of the
relatives
with whom he had no contact since the
beginning of the war. Quote, when we were
unable to provide the information the army requested,
communication was cut off, and we were there
later informed that he was transferred to a
detention center he is now considering missing or
considered missing.
Feels very reminiscent to people in this country
being shoved to El Salvador. Right? But guess
what? They've been dealing with this for a
century.
Here is the statement from
the Gaza Relief Committee describing the overall situation
with the aid distribution.
So here's the lies.
You get people like this. So what's been
bottom line, I'm I'm doing this quickly because
I wanna include it today, but we're gonna
talk about it more, is that they created
a choke point to where people then standing
I mean, we're talking all day standing in
the open sun,
already starving, already lacking water, and
they recognize what was happening. And so the
point is after recognizing they're being toyed with
by these monsters, they decided to try to
rush into place where and it's not Hamas.
It's not a Hamas controlled area. It's not
even Hamas in the area. This is a
World Food Programme location. This is 40 times
over you can prove this. But the people
like David, these are blind these these people
have been exposed 50 times over for being
caught lying just since October 7 about what
Israel does. So it says, breaking! Gazans are
storming Hamas' warehouse.
You see this you see, they could just
simply say that Hamas that Gazans are stealing
the food.
Instead, they have to lie on top of
that's what the Israeli propaganda is always like.
You mean, the the whole point is they
manufactured this this riot, they're gonna call it,
because they wanted to claim they were all
monsters, despite their watching their children starve to
death and then being basically creating a situation
where you know they're gonna strive for the
small amount you provide.
And they could just say, look at these
people who are attacking us for their food.
That would be enough to manipulate
people in the middle. But instead, they have
to go even further and say, it's Hamas's,
and Hamas is shooting them when they try
to get it. Or even crazier, people out
there going, the Gazans are finally rising up
against Hamas and demanding their food back. It's
it's completely a lie
from top to bottom. This person just pointed
it out. It's a UN warehouse, which you
can easily look up, not Hamas, and it
was preparing packages to be sent out. The
problem that the UN has encountered is that
there are gangs in Gaza, which we've already
reported. The cradle and others have reported are
being influenced and, in many cases, directed by
Israel.
And whether it that which is a provable
reality. Roberts talked about this. But on top
of that,
if they're not Hamas, then you can't keep
blaming Hamas because that makes it easier for
you. That's just what they're doing. But it
says they they've been working to undermine the
aid effort with Israel's assistance. They provide these
gang covers with airstrike, causing officials, and police
try to stop them. It's very documented.
Here's another example.
You know all these guys. This Eli Yacobey,
this manipulator has been caught lying a hundred
times over. Here's now there's an outside version.
You can see the World Food Programme right
there, and he goes, Palestinians have broken into
Hamas's warehouse.
You can prove that that warehouse is not
Hamas controlled. That's what's how lazy these people
are.
And he goes, that's increasingly clear aid crisis
isn't due to a lack of supply. That's
the only thing they're trying to push in.
The
chairman
of the UOMED EuroMed Human Rights Group
says, This is the Al Jarafi warehouse, which
belongs
to the UN World Food Programme. It was
being prepared to send flour to the starving
people in Northern Gaza. But Israel obstructed its
delivery. Israel and its supporters have nothing but
lies, lies and more lies.
And the bottom line is, guys, just because
people are protecting the food does not mean
they're Hamas.
It's it's just so blatant what they're doing.
And the point is the reason that wasn't
being moved is because Israel was stopping it
from happening.
Here, case it matters to you anymore, Reuters,
World Food Programme says, hordes of hungry people
broke into Gaza warehouse in deadly incident, and
you could read for yourself. It's their warehouse.
And they're simply saying they broke in because
all of the this is being driven to
reality because they're starving to death.
To blame somebody for doing that is the
worst thing I can imagine right now. Now
on top of that, by the way, Turkey
apparently donated bags of flour
that Israel then dumped in a corner and
never even delivered while delivering burial shrouds to
people starving to death.
Like, not just not feeding them, but giving
them death shrouds as if that's you know,
you can't be more dark than that, more
sociopathic.
Now here is what the US State Department
said under Donald Trump.
And if you haven't gotten sick by now,
this is gonna put you over the top.
I just said, wow. Just speechless that they
can still hold this line after all this
time. And if you thought there was daylight
between what Biden was doing and Trump, guys,
you're not paying attention. Here is how they
responded
to, Prem Thacker in regard to children starving,
everything that's been going on. Her response is
just
straight back to the day one talking points.
Said,
just earlier today, the world has been shocked
by what's happened in Gaza over past few
days. The silhouette of the little girl Well,
I said it's been obviously, it's been shocked
over generations about what's happened in Gaza. Absolutely.
Absolutely. And and that Hamas certainly has refused
to stop that violence, but go ahead.
Oh, way to set the tone. Right? We're
all outraged about the ongoing century long thing,
and it's always a mosque. Go ahead.
That's how she sets the stone. It's we
all know it's only a mosque. That's it.
I just god darn it, man. It's so
frustrating
that this is I mean, my point is
always is that you know what their job
is here. Their job is to do that.
But it's we've gotten to this point where
I just can't stop seeing how cartoonish this
all is. Instead of doing even the smallest
amount of effort to make it somewhat digestible,
You know, some kind of nuance that makes
it go, well, you're not correcting that, but
it's not the, you know, it's not the
day one Israel regurgitated point that you could
literally prove isn't true.
But I think genuinely, this current administration is
the most obvious example of either a foreign
government manufactured
moronic reality
or people that have just been through lesser
of evils over multiple administrations getting worse and
dumber and stupid or none of us. I
mean, these people are in these positions because
I think they're so stupid or so willing
to tow the line that neither one matters.
You tell me why I'm wrong. I mean,
it's embarrassing to watch what so many people
are saying. It's always been an exercise in
futility at these State Department meetings or any
of them. But am I wrong that it's
gotten more ridiculous to the point to where
they're telling you two plus two equals five?
Right? Not some nuance of a different kind
of mathematics. But, nope, just the absolute lie,
shut up and take it. So
but just in the past few days, we've
seen the silhouette of a little girl
trying to flee, burning classrooms surrounding her, killing
people around her. We've seen thousands of Palestinians
starved by Israel's blockade, herded between fences as
they try to get fed today.
Thaws
excuse me. A doctor who saw nine of
her children killed by Israeli bombs. Right. So
all these things which you can literally prove
have nothing to do with Hamas. Right? Israel
bombs killing nine children of a doctor. Right?
All the while, this administration, of course, as
we've seen, has sought to deport students who
protest this, including one student who wrote an
op ed against this kind of behavior. The
administration came in telling Americans it would be
more pro peace, more anti war than previous
to sound like a soliloquy, sir. Do you
have a question, please? Do you have a
question, please? I'm curious. Yes. I have a
very serious issue, and everyone has your question.
Yes. Yes. I I So please ask it.
I wonder how you see this administration being
more pro peace or more anti war than
the previous administration given these kinds of horrors
that Americans are witnessing.
Yes. Well, you know, it is,
a dynamic whereas I also just mentioned a
little bit ago, we did achieve a cease
fire, something which No. No. You didn't.
Right? Let's let's start let's start right out
of the gate with a blatant lie. No.
You said that, and then Israel killed everybody
from day one and never stopped. Over and
over and over the whole time, Lebanon, Syria,
and Gaza the entire time. And then broke
that ceasefire that never even actually started
because they wanted to add something that nobody
else did because they were promised they would
be able to break the deal in phase
two, literally like we told you they would
because we watched and reported what they said.
Not some abstract, I mentioned one thing and
different thing every five day. Every day I
mentioned something different than what happened there. I
was right. No. No. We were literally correct
based on the one thing that we knew
was gonna happen or that we reported was
likely. That's actually being right in the story,
not guessing every possible scenario over the week
and then saying the one that I said
was right and then usually being wrong. You
know, like like, are we still pretending that
Netanyahu and Trump split? We still pretend like
the Ukraine war was ended? Are we still
pertaining those drones are searching for nuclear missiles?
Yeah. How many different times can we lie
to by the mainstream alternative media? Anyway, point.
Previous administration given these kinds of horrors that
Americans are witnessing?
Yes. Well, you know, it is,
a dynamic whereas I also just mentioned a
little bit ago,
we did achieve a ceasefire, something which nobody
thought would be possible,
after the, heinousness
of October 7, the nature of what had
occurred.
Right. Because it was just so bad that
they thought it wasn't gonna happen. You know,
it's it's your argument is always, look at
how bad they are with what they did.
Are you ignoring the
half I mean, the majority of people that
were killed by the IDF, which what we
can prove today based on colonels and IDF
members and witnesses and Jewish people that were
there on the ground.
All of it telling you. Hannibal directive. They
killed their own people. I mean, it's a
or the foreknowledge or the way the concert
was moved or the way they were used
as human shields. You know, the reality that
you could just keep going, it was so
bad. Yeah. And people were killed, and it
was bad. You know, it was a hell
of a lot worse, objectively,
every single day since then in Gaza. The
ongoing starvation, rape, torture, murder, and everything else
you could imagine. And then the lies on
top of all of it about the babies
that were killed and the rape and everything
else that didn't even happen.
But see, Tammy Bruce
knows her marching orders.
On that day,
the fact that there has to be a
new way the president has stated, we have
to have new ideas
to make a difference so this stops and
doesn't go from generation to generation. What we've
got Right. So the new ideas are do
exactly what they've always wanted to do. That's
the new idea. The same thing they've always
wanted to do. Ethnic cleansing, displacement, occupation.
Brand new. No. No. They're just now doing
what they've always wanted to do, and they're
telling you finally. Got here is after I
don't know. What has it been? Three months,
a bit over a hundred days of president
Trump, managing to get I think every
warring party, every hostile party against other people
on this planet
to a table to stop.
What a stupid argument. You know, they love
what's funny is half these conversations, Trump the
US government is not even actually involved. They're
just saying things on media and acting like
they influence the outcome. Typical hubris by this
administration.
Or how about Ukraine or Israel and Gaza?
What what's the what's the actual material change?
Nothing.
Exact the war has never stopped or even
barely slowed down, but he sure got him
to the table.
These are meaningless talking points. What is the
actual outcome? Which is what I told you
in the beginning. Don't look at words, look
at precedent,
and look at outcome. If you look at
only those two things, what do we see?
The war has never stopped. They've only gotten
worse.
What we tell
you? Now that's that's the simple part.
May making things happen and making it last
is another thing.
Hamas, we did have a ceasefire. And then
Hamas decided once again that that was just
not going to do, and they continue to
do what they do. So so so you
think she's that stupid, or do you think
she's lying? You can decide. But before we
keep playing, I'll I will show you this.
This is what Jeremy Scahill pointed out two
days ago. This is a recurring pattern. Hamas
accepts the terms of the deal that is
based on what The US says is necessary.
We saw that blinking, like, seven times in
a row. We've seen it at least three
or four now with Trump.
Israel then issues new demands, usually after Hamas
accepts the one they said, only Hamas accepts
and will be over. They do. Then Israel
issues some new demand or claims it's not
sufficient after the fact. The US then gives
covered Israel to blow up the deal and
joins in blaming Hamas. Happened under Biden too.
You know, it's it's my point. It's like,
do we really need to pretend? Does any
anybody not know that? It's embarrassingly obvious. You're
either paying attention
and either denying it because of partisanship or
you know it, or you're only paying attention
to what idiots online say and you have
no idea what you're talking about.
But if I was like to tell us
the only real things happen, there's no way
to misunderstand this. You can't keep saying,
all we have to do is get Hamas
to say yes, and it'll all be over.
And then they do, and then they go,
well, it's Biden. It's still their fault. That
happened so many times. That's why Blinken was
clearly the one that was being played there.
He was the person being at the stand
in. He looked down every single time. Well,
now the same thing keeps happening with Trump
and the rest. The difference is Trump has
promised them the world and keeps delivering. You
could do what you want. Break the deal.
Take the West Bank. Kill everybody you want.
We'll blindly support you.
That first of all, again, in that regarding
that particular issues over the last few days,
we call on all parties to this conflict
to take every feasible measure to mitigate civilian
harm.
We refer you to Israel for more information
on its air strikes.
And Right. So she's skimming over the bombing
of innocent children, the burning child in a
bit in a building, the children killed as
the doctors.
You can ask them for those things that
we don't care about. But Hamas Hamas did
it. And, we also know as we all
do, and this is one of the things
that we discovered,
time and time again, that Hamas uses hospitals
and other humanitarian areas as human shields. This
is Not a single example from the moment
October 7 forward, not a single example has
been proven. They've lied about it probably 45
times and been disproven even by the corporate
media. I don't mean some side subjective side
thing. I mean, breaking down like the last
one I just saw where they said, this
was the tunnel. Nope. That turned out to
be the wrong building, and it turned out
to be something they could prove wasn't even
there. And I'm talking, like, the people on
the ground, the corporate media, human rights groups.
It's embarrassing, and it they I think they
know.
They know that it's that clear, so they
just lie and know you'll see it and
hope that their screaming idiots out there will
be enough to carry it forward. Some cases,
it is. But can you believe that she's
still saying that? On the other side of
it, every single hospital's been targeted. Almost all
of them are destroyed by Israel. They're using
most of them as bases at this point,
and you can prove that. But I guess
that doesn't matter because it's only a one-sided
conversation. Again, it's either that you are willing
to be honest about this or you're blindly
lying for Zionism.
And I think a lot of people on
the side of awareness are just too afraid
to step into it.
Why we continue to try to get a
ceasefire done despite the obstacles that Hamas constantly
presents.
It is it is
apparently their hope that we would just give
up and go away or that the usual
status quo would continue.
Or or or you mean offer to complete
ceasefire for all exchange of all the hostages
and and go and two state solution exactly
what you've always pretended you wanted
and nobody allowed that? You guys push back
on it? I mean, it's insane how you
can stand there with a straight face and
literally say they're the only one that stopped
the thing that they accepted that you've always
pretended you wanted. Or Netanyahu
or the Israeli government saying that we always
want a two state solution, and then you
can quite literally prove that they funded Hamas
to stop that from happening. All of this
is public information, and we are dealing with
very, very, very dishonest, dangerous people.
I'm talking about our government and whoever controls
them.
These are disgusting,
vile people who know what they're lying about
and simply don't care.
That's not the whole country. In fact, I
find it to be a minority, but the
majority of people that find their way in
these positions are on that team.
That we can change.
But president Trump is not that person. He's
a person who gets it done.
And, after decades of conflict,
I understand you're frustrated after maybe three months
of it not being perfect yet. But that
is what we are going for.
Please tell me
listen to that again.
He's a person who gets it done.
And, after
decades of conflict,
I understand you're frustrated after maybe three months
of it not being perfect yet. But that
is what we are going for. I understand
you're frustrated because it's not are are you
serious? Now you're now you're
patronizing him, acting like he's rushing you to
solve the problem?
Oh, god. Like, this is the kind of
this is the kind of thing that I
need to back up. This
makes my blood boil.
I mean, seriously, like I can't I wanna
go punch a hole in the wall when
you see somebody like that.
Like like like Prem Thacker is being too
pushy about solving the genocide.
I know it's been through. I know you
wanna rush and get this all finished like
he's being a child or something. I mean,
you know, just there's something especially dark and
disgusting about someone who can do something like
that
or who drives them to do it.
Here's another example. Drop site news points out,
state department blames Hamas after Israel shoots starving
Palestinians.
I'm sure you won't be shocked what she
says here. Approximately
8,000
food boxes have been distributed so far. Each
box
feeds 5.5
people
for three and a half days, totaling 462
As you could look at these boxes, your
eyes will tell you that's a stupid thing
to say. On top of that, recognizing that
the that many boxes for the amount of
people they have with what we already know
and already in a famine position, it's insulting.
As anybody with knowledge is telling you it's
a drop in the ocean and they turn
around and go, what else do you need
us to do? We're doing everything as they
murder these people in front of you.
Meals.
And so those are the kinds of numbers
I think as we're looking at what's important
in in moving, that kind of aid through
the area. Right. But there was apparently some
incident or incidents today,
involving
potentially shots being avoiding these warning shots being
fired and
and on Oh, yeah. Yes. Hamas still has
weapons. Hamas is,
in an, situation here where all of this
could have stopped, of course, if they Okay.
I got I'm gonna I wanna play it
again
before I I wanna because I let it
go. It's gonna pull with what she just
said right there is astounding.
So nobody's disagreeing with the fact that shots
were fired by Israel. They claim it was
because there are people being rushed and they're
in danger, or specifically The US Mercenaries working
with Israel. Same conversation.
So we know that. Because they already gave
you an argument for why they had to
do that. But miss Tammy Bruce here, because
she's so desperately blindly supporting one side,
just regurgitates with no other, well, Hamas has
still yeah. They've got weapons. Like in this
weird, blithe response, like almost like you're joking
about it.
Well, whether Hamas has weapons or not has
no bearing on the fact that we know
for a fact that that's not what just
happened there. But and even as she goes
forward, you recognize
I think I can see that she recognizes
that kind of failure.
Just watch what I mean by that. But
just acknowledge
her marching orders are to deflect to Israel
away from Israel to Hamas no matter what
the facts are. Sort of like mister vampire
Matt Miller from before who said they're probably
being raped over there, and that that shot
himself in the foot big time because he
walked it back immediately, but he did that
because
subjectively airing on the side of the people
you're supporting. That's not facts. That's propaganda
to what she said.
Is just it kills me.
Fired and and So shots fired
on the ground, which we know was Israel
and The US Mercenaries that are working together
to
help these people and otherwise, starve them and
pretend they're helping them.
Well, yeah. Yes. Hamas still has weapons. Hamas
is,
in an situation
here where all of this could have stopped,
of course, if they had released the hostages
and put down their weapons. But No.
No, Tammy. You're wrong. In fact, I think
you it will I mean, I shouldn't say
that. Frankly, I don't think you're that bright.
And I'm not saying that just to be
dismissive of these people. I mean that. I
don't think these people in positions of power
right now are even remotely as smart as
they'd like to present.
But what you're saying is absolutely without question
wrong, and you could prove it because they
keep telling you that. And captain captain John
or Caitlin Johnstone just ripped this apart. Anyone
still saying, you know,
return hostages, end the war is either dumb
or is manipulating for Zionism because they will
not stop telling you that even if we
get them back, we will not stop until
Hamas is disarmed, that they are removed, and
that we take control of the area. So
she's lying to you. To argue they could
all they do is let their weapons down
and it would all be over, no. They
would still do exactly what they're currently doing.
They've told you that repeatedly.
So it wouldn't surprise me that she's just
completely stupid and informed, but, frankly, I think
it's because she's propagandizing you for Israel.
In an, situation fired and
and Well, yes. Yes. Hamas still has weapons.
Hamas is,
in an, situation here where all of this
could have stopped, of course, if they had
released the hostages and put down their weapons,
but they were Oh, and then don't forget,
they offered that, what, 15 times now being
facetious. At least twice, October,
they offered a full exchange for all hostages
if they stop the war. Israel said no.
Absolutely not. Hamas is secondary. I've shown you
that a hundred times over. And then many
times after that, many times, in fact, recently,
the last one, phase two, was the complete
end. Complete release, end of the war, and
they stopped it.
The only person standing the only entity standing
in the way of actually ending this is
Israel. If you're not if you're not aware
of that, then you are either being misled
or not
able to discern the facts. They'll tell you
that. So I understand what I'm saying. You
can literally listen to Israeli politicians, lay it
all out for you, and then come over
here and listen to Tammy Bruce tell you
the exact opposite.
I'm pretty sure we can trust what the
Israeli government says they're doing versus what Tammy
Bruce wants you to think they're doing.
Refused to do so. They've also rejected ceasefires.
So that's,
without confirming
what might be gossip or single reports. The
fact of the matter is, Hamas has been
opposed to this dynamic. Yep. They have attempted
to stop,
the aid movement through Gaza to these distribution
centers. They Provenly false. Even the World Food
Programme just literally reported publicly that that's not
case. We have no evidence, and everyone involved
has made this case. You can literally prove
that they're stopping the aid. And yet you
can't prove even for a moment that they
what she's claiming. But don't forget the first
point. Well, Hamas has weapons too.
And then follows up by going, Well, I
don't wanna respond to the hypothetical.
So you respond to his point by saying
Hamas has weapons, but then end by saying,
We don't even know if that's true or
not.
See my point?
So the the direction from this fact based
report is to blindly assume in the direction
of your enemy, no matter what, all the
time, propaganda.
Failed,
but they certainly tried.
The bottom distribution centers, they have failed, but
they certainly tried.
The bottom line is the real story here
is that the aid is moving through,
and, in that kind of environment, it's not
surprising that there there might be a a
few issues involved, but the Oh, can can
I just point out how disgusting it is?
Her little smirk when she says that, Oh,
you mean a few issues like like genocide
and and murdering of innocent people starving with
their families? Yeah. Couple little snafus.
Guys, people are gross. There there might be
a a a few issues involved, but the
good news is is that, those seeking to
get aid to the people of Gaza,
which is not Hamas,
have succeeded. And last one really brief Flatly
false. I mean, if that's the most embarrassing
part, that's not true. They're still starving. I
won't take up any more time. But, my
understanding is that the administration is not particularly
happy with the position that the UN
and its agencies have taken with Yeah. Which
is this is all a big show, and
it's not actually helping, and they're lying, and
they're stopping food. You know, like, literally what
everyone can prove. So the point is the
Trump administration's angry that the UN is calling
out their facade. Regard to these, shipments.
Is that correct?
Well, it is. I've from the very beginning,
we had, I'd mentioned and we had, heard
about,
the resistance by,
certain NGOs and the UN. Yeah. Get there.
It is unfortunate because the issue here is
getting aid to Gazans. Yeah. What they've all
been trying to do endlessly
and that you've actively been stopping at every
possible turn. Like, even right now. I mean,
we'll show you the clips in a second.
And then suddenly, it moves into complaints about
style or the nature of who's doing it
or You see my point? Style?
You mean the shooting of people waiting in
line for food? You mean the deliberate use
of the wrong things like death shrouds instead
of food that they could use that you
throw in the corner. Yeah. These aren't functional
issues. This is deliberate tactics meant to starve
these people while pretending
that you're feeding them.
The worst of the worst
of the worst
right there in front of you.
Elements of of
administration,
and being opposed to
getting food and aid as we've demonstrated here
is happening and will continue to happen. You
you mean like the peer that you made
the exact same arguments for that ended up
delivering a few palace
that barely even got to anybody or also
carried out an operation where you killed people
in beds and hospitals and then dismantled it,
went away? Despite all of the massive money
and effort and conversations that people like you
had telling us that it was gonna save
everybody and that they were trying to resist
it because no, they resisted it because we
all saw through it.
Just like right now. But again, you think
they're gonna admit that? Guys, they will never
stop saying the thing that they want you
to think is the case. Like we said,
like Andreessen and and Karp and the rest
will tell you, you just double down and
you lie. That's what they do. Because someone
might feel left out,
is I think the height of impunity.
So The argument though so, like, so now
you're making it about somebody wanting to be
involved?
God. Like, it just gives my skin crawl.
Because, I mean, frankly, I think you know
that she knows what's happening. And your argument
is to try to make it seem like
they're being petty. They just wanna be involved
with what's happening. No. They're calling out you
still murdering people in real time.
And that's the best you can do. The
bottom line is is that, clearly, people who
care about the nature of solving this problem
are taking action and moving it forward,
and that's what counts. That's what matters. Yes.
Andrea. Power. Yes, ma'am.
It's just absolutely disgusting. Now to prove that
she's lying as usual, let's go through a
couple more points here. We'll just ask Patrick
Kennington points out. And this look at look
at these people. You wanna break down for
me how this is a functioning a distribution
dynamic, but it goes real. Dear this is
Patrick Henningsen. Dear Donald Trump, this is your
legacy right here. Concentration camps and a genocide.
The backlash will tarnish your brand for generations.
Concentration camp. Immelating people starved for eighty six
days. Shame on this world.
Wild.
And of course, in case you didn't see
this, here's Netanyahu yesterday.
Comes out and says, there's no famine in
Gaza because we detained thousands of civilians.
These are his words. And photographed them naked,
because that's totally acceptable. Right? And there were
no signs of hunger on them. In fact,
they just don't do sports exercises.
I swear to you, that's what he said.
He literally said, no, they're not starving. They
just don't have muscle. They're just not very
they're not athletic.
But let's let's move past the fact that
they
detained a bunch of civilians and made them
get naked and took pictures of them. But
that's no big deal because we were trying
to prove that you were lying. Right? Guys,
these people are absolutely outside their minds.
That's insane to me. And I said, alright.
They just posted what he said. They just
don't do sports exercises.
I said, how did these clownish monsters
ever gain control of the narrative in the
past? It baffles me. And there's the IPC
report
from, what, six, five months ago? 1,100,000
people, half of Gaza, catastrophic food insecurity. That
is the IPC. That is the integrated food
security phase classification. That is the place you
go to find these things out.
There's Smotrich
saying we are being blessed, he says, with
the opportunity,
thank God, of seeing an expansion of the
borders of the land of Israel. You know,
ethnic cleansing.
Calling it colonialization.
I mean, it's just it's amazing to me
that the and this is the point that
always frustrates people like us. Is it this
guy and Kavir and even Netanyahu have been
publicly telling you this for so long, and
yet we can't have an honest conversation about
this. This is greater Israel. Right? This is
expansionism. This is taking Syria, Lebanon, everywhere, guys.
They're taking people's territory,
and the US government is paying for it.
You're paying for it.
He says, seeing an expansion of the borders
of Israel on all fronts, he says. Yep.
Exactly. Right now, there's not one front of
Israel that's not currently expanding.
We are being blessed, he says, with the
opportunity to blot out the seed of Amalek.
So murdering every Palestinian
is what that means.
A process which is intensifying.
Proudly telling you this.
Last point before I finish with a clip
that'll probably choke you up.
This is a poor a tweet that went
out
showing in, these are Sangalese
as I say it, Sangalese from some Sangalese
students,
expelled the Israeli ambassador
from the campus
in a university
in Dakar where he came had come to
attend a conference on international relations.
They chanted murderer, criminal, free Palestine.
You can literally watch, they chased him out.
He had to run away.
And this is a large reason why this
whole effort to make it, you know, it's
basically, you know, they're creating a racial divide
right now, very clearly.
And it's not because you're not white, you're
good, not vice versa. It's never like that.
There are people on all sides of every
racial divide that are disgusting, immoral,
genocidal people and vice versa. There are people
on all sides that are good, people on
all sides. That's the reality. The point though,
is they really are trying to drive in
this wedge because I think right now what
you're seeing is that most of the world
is very aware of what's actually happening. And
the best they can do is try to
divide you on classic division tactics,
race, politician or politics,
anything, religion.
So my point, just just a thought. First
of all, I just want you to see
that. The people around the world are not
standing up or are not taking anymore. They
are standing up. But if history is any
guide with what we've seen with South Africa
and the ICJ and just about everything else,
If history is any guide, we can now
expect Israel to falsely manufacture one of three
things in sen Senegal in Senegal.
Senegal. Either a humanitarian crisis, in quotes,
an immigration dilemma,
or an antisemitism
issue.
And of course, the America First US government
will scramble to make it priority number one.
We'll see what happens.
Now, my point is not that I'm saying
we know that's gonna happen. Right now, it's
just as likely that Israel's overburdened with, you
know, stretched too thin. My point is simply
that historically, first recognize that that's what this
government does. They will go after maliciously anybody
that simply calls them for what they are.
I mean, crimes, not some kind of racial
point. You're committing a crime. And what you
notice from the Trump administration, or rather the
current US government, is the same thing.
Irrational, childish responses about just people that call
you out for what we all know you're
doing. And I'll leave you with this. As
David Icke said, I am banned from 30
European countries
and Australia
for antisemitism. And and which is not what
it's really about. And have had events canceled
all over the world for publicly calling out,
since 1995,
the grotesque evil that the Israeli government that
that of the Israeli government that all the
world can now see. I agree.
It's not antisemitism
at all. It's called basic
humanity.
And do not try to conflate that with
him saying antisemitism. He's not even remote referring
antisemitism. He's saying that you're calling his basic
humanity antisemitism to hide what you're calling out.
In no way is he saying anything about
Jewish people. He's talking about Zionism, most importantly,
and what they're doing to the world, anyone
who supports them. And he says, but that's
a crime today, right, Mr. Trump? Calling this
out?
RTR World, Palestinian Ambassador.
Jeez. I hate the way Twitter works, right?
Twitter is so ridiculous. So tell me how
that works. I click on this tweet.
Look what it takes me. Is that what's
happened to you? That doesn't seem right. Pretty
sure that happens to me or certain people
that do what I'm doing. Now I have
to oh, there it is. Find the one
in the middle. Palestinian ambassador to the United
Nations
breaks down in tears as he tells security
council that what is unfolding at Gaza and
is human tragedy deliberately caused by Israel. Now,
really, it's it's
it's powerful to see somebody in this position.
Right? Somebody that it's it's like seeing the
doctors break down. To see somebody that's been
doing this their entire life, to see them
affected by this.
Now just I mean, look. Regardless of what
you think about where he comes from or
what his background is or who he supports,
realize that what he's discussing,
at least as far as I can prove,
is what's going on. A genocide.
They are murdering people. They are laughing about
it. They're posting videos of it. They're talking
about it openly. And yet your politicians and
your government, the whole point of today, clearly
influenced or bought off are lying to you
about it in profoundly obvious ways.
So just hopefully this will impact somebody to
recognize that they're really trying to frame anybody
who is trying to call this out as
somehow the other, the the evil villain supporting
Hamas. And in reality, as you're gonna see
in this clip, he's just a man with
kids
that sees what's going on and has a
hard time even having an open conversation about
it anymore because it is just beyond what
any normal human being is supposed to endure.
So thank you for tuning in today. Please
find the courage to stand up for this.
Because they, Palestinians, and like a lot of
other people, need
us out here to call these things out,
to reach new people. Who knows what momentum
what you know, what one more person could
do. What one more voice could do to
the momentum that could cascade everything into the
direction we want. We just don't know. That's
why all we can do is act for
ourselves. We can stand up for what we
believe in. We can see what we think
and try to help other people see what
we think is correct.
Momentum
is already there. The world is there. We
see it.
Please do not slow down.
Keep calling this stuff out, helping people see
it, give the information, show them the show,
give them the source material.
People are thirsty for it, guys. I really
do feel that we we're on the precipice
of something, and it very well could go
in the wrong direction. But that's why we
need to be as vigilant as ever.
Thank you for tuning in today. I love
you all. As always, question everything. Come to
your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Children
are dying of starvation.
The only the images of mothers embracing
their
motionless bodies,
cracing their hair,
talking to them,
apologizing to them.
This is a bad habit. I'm a good
at you point.
Totally.
It's
sort
of
Excuse me, mister president.
I have grandchildren.
I know what they mean to their families.
And to see the situation of the Palestinians
without us having hearts to do something
is beyond
the ability of any normal human being to
tolerate.
Come on.
Affirmative. I have visuals.
Sorry. You're sure about the coordinates? I'm seeing
some civilians nearby.
Enjoyed.