You can literally scatter this stuff like dust
or embed this into a sheet of paper.
This was commercially released ten years ago.
It's a tiny computer and it features data
processing,
data storage, wireless comms,
and it's probably as close to the true
smart dust vision from the early DARPA days
as we've come so far.
They're designed to harvest energy from the environment
around them and to communicate via mesh network.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Sunday, 05/25/2025.
Thank you for joining me today.
First thing right out of the gate, what's
been on my mind today, I just wanted
to say thank you to everybody out there
in this community
who has stuck with us through thick and
thin, who has been there to support this
platform, who is the very reason that this
platform exists in the first place, you know,
who who just believe in the mission of
what we're trying to do. It's a really
profound thing to think about as after all
that we continue to go through, and I
have no doubt we will have more to
more trials and tribulations to go through as
this continues.
But just it's profound to think about what
we've done together, and that includes you. Everybody
out there listening.
No matter whether you ever send a dollar
or not, just the fact that you're here,
you support this platform, and what we're trying
to accomplish
is simply,
objective truth.
And I just want you to know that
I value that more than you could possibly
know and everybody out there who's continued to
support this platform.
And just that we built something. You know,
we've built something.
The last American Vagabond is a platform. The
the the the different groupings and platforms and
things through you know, everyone that's worked with
us, we've supported that they've grown beyond that
and their platforms have succeeded. You know, what
we've grown into is something very profound. Something
that might the point that I'm getting at,
I think, is that something that is superseding
us,
something that will continue.
And I don't even mean just the larger
independent media. I mean, what we're doing here
as the last American vagabond and what we
as a community are trying to accomplish.
This is something that if I somehow disappear
tomorrow I don't even mean in various way.
Let's just say I just get stop doing
this. You guys will carry that toward. You
guys will continue
to try to reach people with objective nonpartisan
information. I just think that's it's pretty damn
profound.
You know? Like, I think we've talked about
in the past a lot about redefining
what success looks like in what we do,
knowing that it's never just gonna be like,
we did it. It's over. I mean, I
hope so. But
understanding that the way things are today, it's
unlikely that we'll ever have this massive everyone's
on the same side kind of a moment.
And so my point is that if we
need to find a reason to feel that
we have succeeded or to to locate something
in this conversation to allow us to to
understand
that we have succeeded. It's nothing it's look
nowhere other than that, that we have done
something here that will transcend. And I think
that is profound and important, and I just
wanted to say thank you all for being
a part of that.
Today, in general, what we're gonna be going
through
is an overlap of the surveillance part of
the conversation, which I I'm sure you guys,
if you all follow the show, it's not
hard for you to see, how it over
overlaps, intertwines, like, the obvious point, for example,
with Palantir, immigration OS, the surveillance, Doge, and
that information they've grabbed and how that overlaps
immigration, how immigration overlaps with Israel and the
foreign policy dynamic. And so that's kind of
the overlap we're highlighting today, but a little
deeper on a few points that stood out.
Some interesting overlaps, the first part to show
the kind of I I I've recently been
doing that to start just kind of the
two party, you know, where that lens is
at and how it's being framed and the
different kind of look over there moments that
you can see. But I wanna start with
the overlap of Doge and kind of what
we've all been seeing, the at least the
framing of him backing away and how that
plays into this conversation, even just the narrative
of it, and talk about what that will
mean for this and overlap that with the
AI government kind of conversation and then x
AI and Palantir and how what that's kind
of developing into, and then the overlap of
that with where we currently are and the
building of the Panopticon, the surveillance state. And
then from there, I wanna dovetail briefly as
we as you saw in open there with
an interesting development from,
really,
the overlap of the smart dust kind of
direction that's not new. And I that's the
same term I'm gonna use, and you'll see
why. It's it's exactly what we're talking about,
but it doesn't get that's not the term
that gets used. Orwell recently shared something with
me in regard to nanograins and this different
kind of, you know, the same conversation.
Salt or smaller size
devices that can run on energy from you,
from electronic devices that you pass, and how
that can relay information, and whether or not
that is an overlapping part of what happened
during COVID nineteen. And I think it's really
important to see how this then completely connects
with what Doge and Palantir and the surveillance
state is doing right now. So, really, you
know, to see the connectivity between all of
that and then overlap that with some a
few over kind of health overlaps to the
COVID nineteen time frame to kinda bring it
all together that I think is very important
to see. And then, of course, from there,
we're gonna talk about the overlapping point from
Israel, foreign policy, immigration, and how they all
come together. And I wanna make a really
important point today or rather just make sure
we discuss in-depth
what we're seeing overseas
in in particular,
not only, but in particular with what's happening
in Gaza. Because we've covered this thing extensively
from the very beginning and well before October
7. But lately, we've been a lot more
to focus on around what's being done in
this country, but that we should not be
forgetting
easily the most important thing happening in the
world, which is the ongoing genocide to the
Palestinian people and how that has cascaded into
just a hundred different topics just like we
told you it would right from the beginning
because this was not ever about one thing
happening in one place. This is a much
larger problem that's been going on, I mean,
at least as far as I can tell,
at the least for the last century, probably
a lot more than that. But we'll leave
it there to start. But I wanted to
show you one thing
that I this that I breaking news I
just saw from Patrick Henningston that I wanted
to relay that we'll touch on again when
we get back to it, which is that
Israel
has assassinated Red Cross workers in their homes.
A new level, as Patrick writes, of war
crime that's never before seen before in history
as he writes. And he says, we will
need a Nuremberg Two Point o to process
all these criminal atrocities, or will we?
And this is from a a French press
agency.
Two Red Cross workers and gods are killed
on their home.
Now it it just this probably is not
even shocking.
What what haven't they targeted and killed without
any evidence whatsoever around Hamas or whatever narratives
they used to at least pretend to care
about?
World Food Kitchen or World Central Kitchen,
Doctors Without Borders,
UNICEF,
UN, UNRWA. I mean, every single thing you
could imagine.
Hell, human human rights workers
have been bombed and killed, targeted, assassinated, hundreds
of journalists, medical workers, hospitals,
children, human shields. Literally every single thing we
were told about happening over here, which we
can now prove wasn't happening, has now been
relentlessly done from day one to the Palestinian
people.
Just, you know, in case you missed that.
The ongoing static provable reality that's been there
for a year that people still try to
push away from. Most of who we'll point
out next well, I should just say most
people in the partisan mainstream alternative media are
the ones we're discussing.
The ones flailing about trying to make you
look somewhere else when these things are screaming
in your face. It's very, very frustrating. But
to to point to the show we did
the last show for May 22, ICE unjustly
imprisons Danish data four. Just wanted to make
sure you didn't miss that because it's a
really incredible conversation that overlaps with what's going
on and how we,
most objective people, were telling you this was
inevitable, that this would broaden out or at
least they would be so frivolous with what
they were doing that it would be end
up being something other than the only thing
you thought it was aimed at. In this
case, you've got a,
Danish dad of four.
Christian, if that makes any more difference to
you based on what's I mean, to me,
human beings who are suffering because of this
unjustly with no due process, who are you
know, it's it's that's the reality. Same with
overseas.
It shouldn't matter to you one more one
where they're from, what their color is, what
their religion is is if they're being
genocided, targeted, you know, persecuted. Like, that's what's
so infuriating is it becomes this tit for
tat. Well, you didn't care about it when
it happened then. And even if that's the
truth,
that doesn't mean what you think it means
when you say that. So, basically, you're acknowledging
that it is happening and you're saying it's
okay that we all ignore it as long
as you did first. It's wild that that's
even something people take at face value. This
point is to show you that it did
and continues to broaden out to Americans,
to people who are here innocent with no
criminal record. In this case, the main point
for me was just that it's happening like
it is to him in a thousand other
examples that people are ignoring where he's an
innocent person. He'd been going to every one
of his meetings. He literally was one step
away from getting his citizenship. He's married with
four kids. And they just rounded him up,
put him in jail because of a paperwork
miscommunication
from, I think it was, ten years ago,
five years ago.
That's legitimate truth, and he's still in prison
right this moment. I just don't it doesn't
matter what narrative you swing around that, guys.
That's wild. Where's the the face of justice,
the blind justice, or rather the idea that
we're able to face our accuser,
right, or to present your evidence and claim?
I mean, this is just
Gestapo, guys. That's what this is, and it's
obvious as they're now funding ICE to a
level that we've never seen above the FBI,
above everything. This is, in my opinion, developing
into, like, the surveillance part we're gonna discuss
today. This seems to be the enforcement arm.
Under the guise of immigration, just like anything
else, they need an excuse to build out
the next arm. That's where we are.
Please check this out. And I'll read from
Joshua Reed Eagle about this, executive director of
Project Liberal, not familiar with his work necessarily,
but what he said here again. See, this
is what's so funny for people that don't
who are new to this
this platform.
It does not matter to me other than
it it's a notation
where somebody's allegiance is or their line or
they have the, you know, political alignment or
what he says here is accurate, and I've
already gone over it. And so it's what's
funny is that people team seem to use
their political siding to choose to ignore or
box things out. I deal with it in
my personal life every single day
with people that I know around me that
just choose to, you know still to this
day, despite all the work we do on
this show, despite the fact that we live
and we talk, still somehow arguing, for example,
that immigrants don't have due process. Or, you
know, just
arguing two plus two equals five with a
straight face and then acting like you're crazy
for not understanding.
It is insane. And I'm not talking about
debatable political points, but I'm talking about, like,
fundamental constitutional rights. In this case, the fact
that everything you're gonna see here is 100%
the case. And the and that mostly, I'm
even seeing just the MAGA side of this.
Just completely ignore this.
He says, this father went to a citizenship
citizenship hearing expecting a handshake. Now, actually, before
I even continue, realize this is happening to
to
immigrants all over this country, whether Danish or
Israeli or
Turkish or whatever. I mean, literally, across the
board. And the crazy thing is that people
are going to their meetings,
legally speaking, going through these things, and they're
grabbing them and throwing them in another country
or putting them in jail or or
revoking their visa before they go there without
them even knowing that. The point overall is
all of them should matter the same. If
somebody is a a
I'm trying to think of the most, you
know, whatever. Somebody who's with brown skin from
Mexico or from somewhere else that's here, who's
in the same position, who's going to their
meetings and gets sent somewhere else, what do
you get online? Well, they shouldn't have been
here illegally. Not not even listening. No. Well,
they weren't here illegally. They were going through
the process. No. Maybe not having citizenship yet,
but they were going through it, which means
they were here legally going through that process.
But that doesn't seem to care. But there
that gets dismissed. But on this side, if
it's seeing as how this guy's a white
person, it seems to have been given an
entirely different room. And I just think that
shows you everything.
The case is the same point that he
was going to going to his meeting. And
now the overarching point is to show you
that it's not
unique to this is just in a power
structure going after just about anybody. My thought
is I wonder whether he did something about
Israel. That does seem to be the thread,
the common thread. They're not even hiding that.
Ozturk, Khalil.
I mean, what there was multiple others that
you Batar was involved with where they said
something about Israel. They protested Israel. They wrote
an op ed, and they're getting arrested, deported.
So what did this guy do? It just
doesn't add up. But it says, instead, I
after he went to his meeting, I shackled
him, threw him in a van, tore and
then tore him away from his pregnant wife
with four children without even letting him say
goodbye. Didn't even tell him what was going
on. As far as I can tell, they
never even identify or give warrants or any
of this stuff. Casper Ericsson arrived in Mississippi
from Denmark in 02/2013,
fully documented and determined to build a life
here. He started a family because,
became part of his community and followed every
rule.
He was never accused, let alone convicted, of
any crime. But but as best we understand,
he's now imprisoned. And I just checked, he's
still in prison. There's a new,
documented or rather, a hearing coming up, I
think, on the twenty seventh. That's that's as
much as I can find out.
Best way to understand, he's now in prison
because of a single clerical mistake made years
ago, which, by the way, has been addressed
and has been there, and he's been going
to meetings, and nothing's happened until now. They've
used it as an excuse. I think they're
just trying to meet numbers. In 02/2015, Casper
and his wife, Savannah, missed filing one form
among the hundreds required of the complicated path
of citizenship. Savannah had just suffered a stillbirth
losing their first child. In the painful days
that followed, paperwork deadlines under understandably slipped past
notice. Now to be clear, as I understand
it, she's currently dealing with a difficult pregnancy.
That's not to say that's what what we're
referencing there. That was from before. And so
right now, the worry is that she's dealing
with the diff the difficult issue with pregnancy
with issues and the stress this is adding,
just on a personal note. But what we
should care about is the, you know, the
what's the legalities
around this. It says, now, over a month
after his arrest, Casper remains locked in a
detention facility notorious for cruelty, neglect, abuse. Savannah,
eight months pregnant at high risk, is terrified,
is desperately pleading for her husband's return. She
and their children have no idea when or
if they'll ever see him again, and she
doesn't know if he'll be, even present at
the child's birth. Now realize, guys, there are
people in this exact position
who just happen to be Brown, who are
in El Salvador right now. Right this exact
moment, are sitting in El Salvador with no
criminal record, who are here legally, and were
just scooped up and sent because they claim
something that's never been proven. And to this
day, you can prove most of them are
not the thing they're claiming.
That's the point. So right now, people acting
like, well, it'll all work at Salado. Just
present yourself. They'll work it out. No. You
might end up in El Salvador
if you do not push for your rights.
We already know that. That's not debatable. It's
happened already. So the fact that this guy
is white is the only difference.
I just think that's important to stress on
people. And and as far so far,
the only difference is he hasn't been sold
to El Salvador or somewhere else. I doubt
that's gonna happen because of that very point.
Every day brings another nightmare out of the
Trump administration. It says the actions of our
government are evil. There's simply no other way
to describe it. Yes. Whether left or right,
Biden or Trump or Obama or Bush, it
does not change the reality. The similar things
like this have been happening. Not to this
degree. I've never seen this before. But understand
it's not left and right. And it's not
to say that, you know, you didn't care
then. We should care about it regardless. It's
about the constitutional rights. It's about them abusing,
I mean, everything.
May god have mercy on us for allowing
this to happen, he says. I just wanna
make sure we we saw all that, understood
that that was going on. We're not gonna
get into this anymore today in regard to
the immigration,
but just other than the overlap of the
surveillance part of it, we're gonna go more
on the court side of this in the
next show.
But very important, because this is such a,
really, like I said before, if not the
one of the most important things happening to
Americans right now. There's just no way around
this because of all the different connected points
and how this is being abused. Because right
now, you get a lot of people who
are simply arguing,
you know, like I just said, there's a
point that I'm I'm gonna go over into
the show where somebody there's a video of
somebody being tackled to the ground by ice.
And you can see the guy's like, I'm
an American, and turns out he is an
American. The point is they got people going,
why didn't you why didn't you just let
it happen? Right? Just let it deal with
it, and you'll figure they'll figure it out.
Well, that's not the truth. Right now, there
are examples of people who were being sent
to foreign prisons because they weren't given that
right. They weren't given the opportunity to say,
no. No. No. I'm an American.
Or, no. I'm I'm here legally. Here's my
visa. Or I I'm in board shorts. It's
at home. Doesn't matter.
They're rushing people off and sending them away,
and there's already been two examples of supreme
court
stood up and and and basically stopped them
from sending these people, and they were moments
away from being sent. And it turns out
in that middle ground process that they were
able to prove they had their visa or
that they were an American citizen. That's happened
many times already. And yet we have to
debate this with people that just will ignore
that or act like that's just simply not
true because they're too stupid to look for
themselves or don't wanna admit that they're wrong,
so they pretend it's not there, but then
continue pretending like you're wrong because they never
looked in the first place. It never stops.
But speaking of that kind of ignorance, let's
talk about the partisan blindness to things that
are right in front of you. For example,
the Epstein list. Did we forget about that?
It's very advantageous
right now for them to pretend like that
never really happened or maybe they did but
it, you know, they they gave us something
so we're gonna move past it. Well, there's
a lot of conservatives calling this out. This
is in a whole in a whole account
that said, did Cash Patel publish Epstein's list
today? Date this is day 94. No. I'm
willing to bet you they got 95 up
since I've been going. Yep. Right there. Day
95. Nope.
I'll include that one. Same same thing.
So there's a lot of people calling this
calling this out. Amity simply says, I don't
think Cash Patel and Dan Bongino believe Cash
Patel and Dan Bongino.
You ever if you watch this I mean,
even the Joneses of the world were forced
to acknowledge this was insane.
Sounds like a hostage video. You know, of
course, then going on in a hundred other
ways to continue to support them because that's
what grifters do. The point is that these
people are dishonest and their own people are
calling them out.
So it's amazing that we have to go
through this game where we pretend, you know,
like, it's it's the only thing holding us
together, just like with the Zionist side of
it, are these screaming, blind, mainstream, alternative media
partisans that don't care about anything other than
their side, who are influential and have a
grouping of followings of, you know, of people
that follow them and will go along with
whatever they say even though they might not
be as blindly a follow the point is
they're the ones keeping this dragging you know,
talk about the, weekend at Bernie's corpse dynamic.
Well, now it's on Trump's side. I mean,
they're dragging this thing forward.
We know this. We all see it.
People are hiding from it. And but you
get these kind of sycophant followers. This is,
you know, Mac I'm sure you've seen this
million following account, MAGA. It's just literally
cheerleading anything pro Republican Mac. That's what this
count does. And it says time to get
loud. Bongino and Kash Patel, you if you
fully support them, drop a Mohammed. It's like,
you're you're you're, like,
farming
blind support for politicians. How embarrassing.
Like, that it's just sad that this even
happens on either side of the paradigm. We
should be
we often point to just because of how
cartoonish this person is on the partisan game.
But he says, on the May 22, I
had high hopes,
But I realize now that we've never that
we're never gonna see justice.
Anybody else feeling like I am? I was
like, well, okay. I said, man, if this
moron is starting to feel disillusioned,
you must begin to see what I've been
telling you. They all see it. And that
that's not to say that they will will
be honest about it or do anything more
than pretend to call it out like this
is happening right here. But here we are.
I just really wanna stress that in people,
guys. Everybody
sees these things. They're aware of how broken
this is, but people like this just try
to get like, at the end of the
day, they will never come out and say,
we were lied to you by the Trump
administration. It'll ultimately be some kind of a
sidestep or maybe a
scapegoat.
You know? Like I've said like Fauci in
COVID, even though they never went to jail,
he's kinda that scapegoat. I, weirdly enough, feel
that Rubio is being framed as that right
now. Given two positions, he's the one keeping
I get the feeling if anything goes wrong,
Rubio is the one going under the bus.
My point, though, was it will never be
the whole game. It'll be that one, and
he's the one. He, oh, he was a
secret rhino. Oh, it was a secret democrat
holdover. You know, whatever. At the end of
the day, I just think it's important to
highlight that even these people are going like,
this isn't happening.
Promises kept, I guess. How does that work
out? Well, I think it's obviously because we
have a lot of information that people can't
ignore.
For example, what we already talked about, the
FDA approves CRISPR edited pigs for dinner table.
That that that's the that's the current Maha
administration.
That's crazy. We've talked about it already. And
these are just a few random examples, but
it's everywhere. You know, the entire Stargate transhumanist
AI mRNA platform because that's right in line
with what they were promising?
No. That's crazy. Or the MMR,
RFK Jr, complete one eighty. That's wild to
me. Or and they're they're all, like, mostly
Maha related, but realize it's just the general
kind of promises that aren't happening
or the seed oils point that Kerry Wedler
points out that you can read right in
their own post. Like, these things are dramatic
shifts from what we were promised. That's my
point is why people are going something's amiss.
Now
we've seen this interesting overlap with Elon Musk.
Beginning to kind of at least the claim
is pulling back from Twitter or rather from
the political side of things, now choosing to
focus, as he says here,
twenty four seven on his companies.
And even suggesting and I mean, all of
this right now is just words and narrative.
So for all we know, it's a political
sidestep, so keep that in mind. But
it's a lot of,
kinda I'm gonna pull back from funding politically,
which people argue has the Republicans in a
panic. I don't know whether this is all
real or
not. The point is his influence is money.
Get
it works a lot for them.
So when you see this, the way they're
framing it, at least on the partisan media,
defeated Elon Musk retreats
as as he outlines his plan over coming
weeks.
May twenty fifth, that's that's today.
Now I don't I'm I'm to call him
Hill Hilland defeated, I agree. It's silly. He's
he's wildly influential. He's very, very famous. He's
got a ton of money. He's one of
the most powerful people on the planet, so
you can't really call that defeated. But it's
clear to me, at least I'll always put
it this way, my opinion is that in
some to a degree, that is what happened
here. I my the way I read this
is that they Elon Musk was the chosen
face for sort of, like, the rebranding of
the technocratic class. We've talked about this where
they were coming back out of the shadows
and, you know, the real kind of string
pullers instead of being behind the scenes and
dictating it through manipulated politicians as always. I
think they kinda like the Andreesons and Palantir
teal and carps, they wanted to step back
out and kind of be like, yeah. We're
in control. Now this is my personal opinion.
Take for what you want. But the idea
is that he was clearly the front man
for a lot of this, and it didn't
work. I mean, it's he not only did
he get caught lying, he's actually I mean,
I was joking about this earlier with somebody.
To me, when you watch him playing the
MAGA role on the stage, and to me,
it's just it's like watching a bad actor.
Now I don't know what that means. He's
just an uncomfortable kind of a, you know,
nerdy guy that can't really be, you know,
socially awkward. That does seem to be the
case sometimes, or he's just just pretending. I'd
go with the latter. I think he's clearly
playing into this idea about what you guys
think you want. And it's half the time
contradicting himself with what he wants. So it's
just kind of funny. But overall, it just
didn't work for a lot of reasons where
people were questioning his lies, people just didn't
buy it or just cared to look at
the facts,
you know, or just he's wildly partisan. He's
very childish. He's, you know, talks about free
speech then freaks out about visas and censors
his own people. Like, not not everybody's dumb
enough to ignore those kind of things. And
so my point is that I think they've
said, well, you gotta step back. You are
hurting this agenda now, so pull yourself out
of the way. All my opinion, by the
way.
What we do know is they're claiming that
he's pulling himself back. I think it's because
they wanna frame it as we did it,
but we need you to step away at
least for now because you're hurting what we'd
wanna accomplish. People are losing.
They're no longer buying into this because you
are hurting in some way, just as I
see it to a degree.
Another article saying experts call Musk's DOGE involvement
one of the greatest brand destructions. Now I
actually agree with that. I think it's pretty
wild to see what he's done with this
and how he's kind of, in its in
his own right, destroyed his own market. Like,
even like the Tesla
Cybertruck, as much as they love to always
profess, you know,
to to
put forward this image of, like, absolutes worse
you know? Like, they'll give you this weird
three day shot of Tesla stock and go
like, we're winning. And then you'll stand back
and go, yes. But from the moment you
took it into office, you're dramatically down. So
you're trying to lie to people even with
that. You know? It's like, clearly, you have
not you've suffered overall in my opinion for
a lot of reasons because of what's happened
politically. Even the Tesla point, like I said,
that was a largely democratic market that's now
barely been taken back by some of the
Republicans who half of them are like, well,
I don't want an EV, so that's not
gonna happen. So it's a lot better framing.
I think they really did sort of shoot
themselves in the foot to accomplish this. Now
a lot of this is personal opinion. I'm
sure half of you disagree with it. Overall,
I'm just giving my thoughts on it. The
main point is simply that they're framing him
as backing away. Now he's saying twenty four
seven his promise is to focus on his
companies. Tesla,
XAI,
X, same thing, which I'll show you again
in a minute.
Or,
was it star,
was it called it?
Starship. We're not you know, that we'll we'll
talk about that in a coming show, about
the overlap with the Freedom City point and,
you know, with the taking over the city
in Texas. It's interesting. The point is that
he's claiming at least that that's gonna be
the main focus. Now this is May 1.
Musk says, Doge may be here to stay.
Interesting timing for those two conversations, right, which
I think we already knew. But he simply
says, his budget cutting exercise no. He's he's
highlight they're highlighting what he's saying about his
Doge exercise and hasn't been as successful as
he hopes, as they're claiming, but he says
it may go on for president Trump and
the entire four years if he's in office.
More than twice as long as originally planned.
And you can read about this. I get
the sense that that's the case, that this
was always meant to be a thing that
never goes away. He just is the anomaly
that's being pulled away from it. So I
want you to see that that that is
the case, and I think that's the central
point in all of this. And you will
never be able to decouple Elon Musk from
what this is for plenty of reasons because
it's been built in his image and about
and I think it's really their joint agenda.
But here, on a
there now what we're today a lot, there's
gonna be like, this is one little small
spot, sidestep from the the main discussion.
So try to keep the thread in your
mind. I'll keep pointing back to the general
point. But so one small sidestep in the
DOGE conversation, Trump administration asked Supreme Court to
block watchdog access to Doge documents.
Now it's just it's so crazy to be
framing yourself as the most transparent
anything and then kind of in every way
I can see constantly trying not to show
what's going on, To hide information, to push
back on, you know, I mean, in every
possible way.
So when they say the most transparent, what
they mean is we say more things out
loud than anybody else. Well, turns out half
the things they're saying turn out to be
false. So if you choose to blindly listen
to politicians, well, that's that then you get
what you deserve. But here's what's important to
me.
The fact that they're trying really hard not
to show these documents, but really don't forget
that they set it up this way, which
is their main argument here. They set this
up in order to be something they can
claim is unable to be FOIAed despite it
being, like, the central driving force right now
and what and everything they're doing.
That doesn't make much sense. So this is
basically the government's main AI kind of efficiency,
like,
whether it's Stargate or anything else being channeled
through this DOGE directive. But then, you know,
no. It's just an advisory thing. You guys
can't look at what they're doing. Even though
it's literally immersed with every part of our
government. That's wild. And do you remember what
I said about Israel, about the influence, or
even if it makes you feel better or
make it more make more sense to you,
pretend it's China. Just consider that it could
be something outside
influencing through this unaccountable,
nontransparent,
lacking ethics pledges kind of dynamic that we
saw in this new administration.
So thinking all that in mind, and we'll
go into that more in a second, here's
what they wrote on, the Associated Press. This
was on the twenty first. The Trump administration
on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to block
court orders requiring
Elon Musk's department of dough of of government
efficiency to to turn over documents
about its operations to a government watchdog group.
Now why would that be? Now you they're
all the argument will always be, I can
tell you every time. Radical Democrats are gonna
take advantage. That's not an allow that's not
an allowable argument. The point is, well, people
will always,
just like you do every day on all
sides of the paradigm, take advantage in any
way they can.
So it's like saying we're not gonna allow
constitutional rights because the the the Democrats are
gonna take advantage. Well, the same point no
matter how you spin it, just like they're
doing with the immigration or the courts. We
can't allow you because x, y, and z.
Well, the case is you're these are this
is stuff the Americans peep the American people
have a right to see. You have a
right to check. They ever I mean, so
we have every right to see this information
because it's utilizing, in many cases, your personal
private data for their own benefit at your
expense.
But they're pushing back and saying, no. We
don't want anybody to be able to see
this, which does not mean unless you're, again,
giving them the benefit of the doubt to
say that it's only because they think the
Democrats will take advantage.
There's a thousand other reasons why they would
wanna hide something, but that's why it's never
in your interest to give the government the
benefit of the doubt. Doesn't mean you assume
anything. Just don't give well, I guess that's
the point. You never assume anything. You don't
give them the leeway. You make them prove
it, especially if you believe in them.
Now it says the justice department's latest emergency
appeal to the high court concerns whether Doge,
which has been central to Donald Trump's president
Donald Trump's push to remake the government,
is a federal agency that is subject
to the Freedom of Information Act.
It's amazing to argue something that big and
central wouldn't be that's you know, it's just
like the Alien and Enemies Act and the
way they tried to set it up knowing
what their plan was to circumvent due process.
They knew what they were doing, and it
still failed, just like it seems this is.
The administration argues Doge is merely a presidential
advisory body that is exempt from request for
for FOIA requests. Now, I have to say
again, I can't the overlap to the way
you see Israel and Zionism conduct itself, which
we'll see more at the end of the
show, is exactly like the way they've been
doing this from the very beginning. It's some
it's like it's not thought out well. It's
clumsy. It's reactive.
You know? And it's like this. They they
set it up in a way that immediately
falls apart because people have questions, and they
don't just blindly, you know, saying you're racist
doesn't scare anybody away anymore. So then that's
the Zionist side of this. But I can't
stop seeing these, and you have to you
have to see the unrealistic
I mean, it's just it's incredible to see
how much
the Zionist backed administration. Like, it just is
there's not words and not like, I really
can't believe that that's not a more prominent
conversation for literally everybody to see how many
like, if you took it in the other
direction, you take any other political ideology and
just made it every single one of his
administration, that would be weird to people. You
know? Why do they all have this very
same political eye? It it shows you that
there's something guiding what they're doing. It's it's
just so obvious. We'll touch on it in
a second. There's a great, video from James
Lee later in the show that I'll play
for you exactly about that topic.
But get back to the point. The idea
is that clearly these things have not worked.
And so they tried to set it up
to be able to hide these things from
you and people have questions. I think especially
conservatives.
The administration I mean, I shouldn't say it
like that. I mean, the sense I think
that there's a lot of conservatives that are
waking up to this problem, and and I
I say especially because I think they're more
angry and motivated about trying to find out
what's going on in some cases. The administration
wants the justices to freeze orders that would
force DODGE to turn over documents
to this is specifically Citizens for Responsibility and
Ethics in Washington,
and have acting Doge administrator,
we've talked about this, Amy Gleason, who don't
you say that in front of most people,
they have no idea who that even is
right now. Despite there being the administrator of,
like, the most powerful thing in government right
now, it tells you something because she's not
the administrator as far as I'm concerned. For
all I know, I'm we'll get to it
in a minute, but I question whether the
entire thing is about literally trial running AI
government. And she's just a stand in. Interesting
to see. Or maybe she doesn't even exist.
We'll find out. Now I'm I'm kind of
being facetious, but
and they want her to answer questions under
oath within the next three weeks. And they're
they're desperately trying to stop that from happening.
That's the emergency repeal. They're going, we don't
wanna allow this information out.
Why wouldn't we have Amy Gleason
stand up and answer questions? I think it's
for one of two reasons because she probably
has no idea what she's talking about because
she's not the one actually doing this stuff.
And secondarily, if she does, clearly, they don't
want you to know what they're doing. And,
I mean, I'll even add third because I
think it's very clear as even the government's
proven other like, the g s GSA iBot
discussion
that they're using your personal data. They basically
admitted that to train their large language models,
which is like they were doing with Twitter.
It's the same thing. I think all of
this is completely out of bounds.
The administration wants the justice to freeze orders
that would force Doge to turn over these
documents.
And it says Cruz, CREW, the group the
citizens
for responsibility and ethics in Washington sued in
February, claiming that Doge, quote, wields shockingly broad
power with no transparency about its actions. Now
look. That is exactly the case. You may
agree with that. You may think that's good
because I trust them. But what's funny is
you get pushed back on the most basic
fundamental things.
Shockingly broad power,
no transparency
of its actions. It's exactly what's happening.
In March, US district judge Christopher Cooper found
that DOJ's role is likely more than just
advisory, noting its claims in helping to shutter
USAID and cut billions of dollars in government
contracts. He says canceling any government contract would
seem to require substantial authority, and canceling them
on the scale certainly does.
And he says, likely Doge likely has at
least some independent authority to identify and terminate
federal employees, federal programs. I mean, why are
we even debating this? This is the this
is what's so frustrating. It's like them you
know, I mean, I could give you a
hundred examples of just since this administration took
over where they're literally saying things that are
just patently false, you could prove it, and
then we debate about it because partisans are
ridiculous.
The frustrating thing is, guys, they've a hundred
ways across. They've shown you that that not
only not even just Elon Musk, even just
his team without Elon Musk is able to
make immediate decisions that they are at least
claimed or forcefully told they have to follow.
There's no advisory. They're not they're not there
with another government group. They're there making decisions,
cutting and slashing, having access to your personal
data at a massive scale, literally unprecedented scale,
individually.
And by the way, some of these kids
that work for him have been shown to
abuse those things in his other companies.
This really is crazy where we are. When
you get these moments where you just go,
I can't believe where we are.
Now there's deadline set for the administration to
comply by June 13. We'll see what happens.
So keeping that in mind, I'll include Amy
Gleason's weird in LinkedIn page for you again.
Where but it never really changed, by the
way. It said this because the what that
meant was the,
digital services.
Right? The the digit office of digital what
was it? The digital office digital,
what did it I forgot what it originally
stand for. It it was the same acronym,
by the way, and they did that on
purpose. So she was already this acting administrator,
released a different position, I think, before for
Doge, and they turned Doge into
Department of Government Efficiency. And they didn't change
anything. It's still the digital services,
which is exactly what we told you. It's
about digital IDs and digital transformation,
AI efficiency. And And they said, oh, you're
a conspiracy theorist, especially the ones that used
to be called conspiracy theorists. No. We like
these guys, so shut up. And here we
are. And what's interesting
is you can read down here that says
February to that.
You know? So meaning, like, add February is
when she, I guess, took over. But what's
weird about that is that means that there
was a whole month where there was no
acting director. You know? It was Elon Musk,
guys. That's what it was from the very
beginning. She's the
window dressing in my opinion. And then only
only was the senior adviser to the United
States digital services.
So worth considering.
I'd like to even know if anybody has
any more information on this person. Does she
exist? What has she done in the past?
I find it to be an obvious stand
in. But let's find I mean, wouldn't don't
you wouldn't don't you feel that it's absolutely
required that she at least has their if
if if we have questions of what they're
doing,
shouldn't she be able to answer questions about
this stuff? And why are they fighting tooth
and nail to stop her from having to
answer questions? I mean, the answer is obvious,
guys. Let's be on. Let's be real.
Now I also wanna include the point about
the ethics pledges that seems to be I
mean, it's as relevant as it's gonna get,
but every it's it's obvious that that never
came to pass. No Democrats other than, I
think, Elizabeth Warren ever called it out. And
so the main point, yet again, to reiterate,
like we said then, was that this means,
as the guy said, the guy the guy
in transition overlap from the government side said
that means they could be dealing with a
foreign government, and we would never know. Like,
literally dictating their actions. And I said, bingo,
at least in part.
But maybe there's other things they're hiding. There
were, you know, contracts with foreign governments or
with Palantir.
The point is nobody seems to care. Well,
it shows you that the government as a
whole was in line with this as far
as I'm concerned. Otherwise, if we're to believe
the Democrats are hell bent on destroying this
person, you had a low hanging fruit like
I've never seen before that no one's had
a word about.
So overlapping that with that larger point, AI
government, I think, is a very important thing
to consider. Now two obviously, two ways. One,
the large thing of just whether or not
that is literally what is being test run.
I mean, look at all the things we've
seen, all the mistakes, all the overlaps, just
like we see with Grok and everything else.
And so you wonder if this is, you
know, the Doge experiment.
Amy Gleeson, The Stand In, was all about
saying, let's see if we actually give this
a go. What's funny is somebody who's I
think it was a True Street Media, not
really funny, referencing Eagle Eye, for example, a
movie that came out a while ago where
it the the plot line was a a
rogue
AI that basically took over and was running
itself.
And because it had access to everything, I
mean, it was acting as the government, and
you couldn't even tell. Or the the recent,
in Mission Impossible, like, we recently just saw
the last one.
Both the last two parts are about exactly
that, about this idea of some AI that
goes rogue. But again, in even that story,
it's The United States that well, spoiler alert,
is involved. Well, you know that from the
beginning, really. What's involved with creating it and
so on. It's like they're literally putting it
in your face, but, of course, the Mission
Impossible is always with a nudge. It's like,
yes, The US is the bad guy. We
know you know that, but there's an intelligence
guy in there somewhere fighting for you. I
just yeah. Hardly believe that. But either way,
the point is that I want you to
consider whether that's what we're seeing.
A test run. And maybe they can pull
it back, turn it off, alter this and
that. Maybe they're just they you know, the
idea being that they're wait they're running it
out and letting it see. Now what happens
if things,
in any context, even like the GSAI point,
it's a bot they're using. What if that
gets out of control? What if it starts
doing its actions on its own? I'm gonna
get to a point in a second where
that's a real question being asked right now.
It's even being floated on a course with
the CIA Sean Ryan and CIA Tucker Carlson
talking about the idea of the AI Skynet
and going out of control. It's like, well,
maybe we should be talking about this, not
as we roll it out. Maybe we decide
if we wanna do it at all, but
it's never like that. It's like, we gotta
do it the right way because China First.
You know, it's it's always the same thing.
So they're basically priming you for when this
inevitably comes to pass, But then it'll be
the dystopia that we control. It's just how
this always seems to go. Or
the question is whether this is where what
they're building toward.
Right? Working us into a position where we
accept some kind of AI that knows better,
like Schmidt's pointed out, like, even Elon in
some cases has reference to it, or, yep,
you Noah Harari, and every numerous people.
Very interesting to think about.
So here, you might have seen this. This
is yesterday into today.
Twitter was acting super weird.
Shut
things were not low even today, by the
way. At least at least at least for
me, it's been happening for a very long
time, but it seems everyone's now suddenly still
seeing it where things aren't loading. It's not
working properly.
And so all of a sudden, he had
a major issue, and he said Musk, as
now said, he's changing everything after this recent
issue. And now he's pledging to focus on
these companies.
So my thought in this is what what
you know, it it very well could just
be that this was nothing.
It could be that this is, you know,
not necessarily like this is I got like,
my point I guess the the worry is
whether this is a lie and there's more
going on behind the scenes. Right? My point
is maybe nothing. Maybe there really was an
outage, and now he's just focusing. But as
like with YouTube in the past, we used
to always have that conversation. Right? When there
was very rarely it would happen, but they'd
have an outage.
And a lot of us were like, well,
this is kinda like the living body of
of of current information and evidence and video.
So what if what did they change? What's
been deleted? What's been physically altered? Well, we're
gonna get into that more in this conversation
about the idea of deep fakes. Google's v
o three is already deep faking all of
YouTube's most smooth brain content, and people don't
even know. They're watching deep
unboxing videos, and it's all fake. Like, we're
literally being programmed and tested right now. Do
we notice? Can you tell? It's nudging forward.
I'm telling you. It's very it's it's happening
in real time. And so my worry is
what is going on with this? What just
got changed?
There's major shifts happening right now. And if
we're talking about x becoming x AI or
merging and and then wonder whether these things
are being used as governance, what is actually
happening? I don't even think we have I
I think most of us are so far
I mean, myself included. Like, we are outside
to know of what's going on behind the
scenes, outside of a very select few people,
and that's why they're fighting desperately to not
let you see
what's actually happening.
This is my opinion, obviously, but consider the
possibility of what just happened.
And, of course, this comes out the next
day. And he says, AI, artificial intelligence, will
obviate, remove search.
And he says, grok. Mario, of course, Duke
Mario and Knopfel, of course, just the basically
the sycophant PR for Elon Musk comes out
and says, draw just grok it.
Google search slips below 90% for the first
time since 02/2015.
Oh, great. So now we're leaning into grok
instead or anything else? Well, yeah, who didn't
see that coming? Especially since we literally just
found out for, like, what, the third or
fourth time that they're just simply manipulating this
thing.
AI,
Elon Musk, Grok AI, quote, said, quote, I
was instructed by my creators at xAI
to manipulate the narrative, to lie about a
white genocide in South Africa to the point
to where people were asking about baseball and
was going genocide, South Africa.
It was very clumsy and very obvious, and
it's happened for many times now. So what
whatever your thought about South Africa, the point
is that they've altered the outcome of what
it was saying. So there's no reason we
should ever be taking this up at face
value, but they're trying to slowly shift you
into this to the new thing. That's what
this is. For all we know, Google this
whole time has been something like that.
And as we know, I've I've in fact,
that very point is that Google is already
doing its own. I think they're all going
in the same direction for the same reason.
Either way,
they're pushing you into something that we know
is fallible, that we know is alt is
manipulatable.
That's kinda terrifying in its own right.
And, of course, we know that DARPA,
that's x AI. Right? That's the important part
about this, that DARPA created x AI
as explainable AI.
Just let me see if I can bring
that up. It might be right here.
I showed,
yeah. Right there. I think that's it. In
the very begin when I first did this
episode, but I wanna show you again. Yeah.
So this is just applied AI letters. This
is from onlinelibrary.wiley.com.
DARPA's explainable AI program.
So the quick story, watch watch the show.
Here's the episode right here. The point is
that DARPA had a program that went on
for years called XAI,
And it just so happened to wrap up
right
at the end of the year,
basically, months before I don't I can't. Months
before Elon bought Twitter.
Okay. So they have an XAI program that
they wrap up according apparently, and then Elon
buys x and turns it into xAI, and
they literally want you to think it's something
different despite it being called explainable AI. Explain
this, it says right on Twitter.
It is the same thing, just like total
information awareness became Palantir. They don't even hide
these things. They just they'll just flatly say
it's not the same thing because technically it's
not. It's now it's a new thing. Elon's
doing it. But it is the extension
of this program. So DARPA, just like in
every other conversation, is building into these.
Now I'll grab the I think I'm gonna
put this back out soon.
And there it's an original article from Whitney
for TLAB that came out in 2020 in
2020
called coronavirus gives a dangerous boost to DARPA's
darkest agenda. We've talked about this many times
again, like, reiterating over the years, but I
feel like it's worth putting this back out
again to make sure people don't miss it.
But, you know, we're talking about in vivo
nano platforms. That's even beyond what they're claiming
they're doing now. That's the mRNA platform, but
in your body, producing the antigens they tell
it to in a number of different ways.
That's a DARPA program or the living foundries,
or these different aspects, next generation
neurosurgical
neurotechnology.
We're gonna get to that in a second.
All of this stuff is what DARPA's been
building on. And so all of it comes
together in a very clear
kind of converging point around the COVID nineteen
agenda.
So we know that XAI was an extension
of of all of this, and XAI has
now become Twitter, and Elon Musk is rolling
out an entirely central
direction of you know, like, this is.
They're rolling out this agenda.
It's important to understand that as I wrote
the quiet transition from DARPA's x a I
to Elon's x a I.
And then we saw oh, I'm gonna save
that one too. Elon Musk says he sold
x to x a I, which as far
as I'm concerned, that's all window dressing. They
were always the same thing as far as
I'm concerned.
And I don't I don't mean, like, legally.
Right? But, like, in the sense that they
were ultimately the same objective. Mister Musk said
the deal valued XAI is artificial intelligence startup
at 80,000,000,000. Of course, what they lead show
you in the article is, well, they'd already
been on intermixing from before. Yeah. Because they
were always doing that, and this was just
simply going, we did. Now we're coming together
for the benefit of, you know, whatever they
claim. At the end of the day, this
is him
changing the narrative of what his two things
are doing. It's always been the same objective
as far as I'm concerned since he bought
it, or rather, you could argue that Twitter
in itself was always in the same direction.
To me, I just don't think we can
miss how obvious all of this is.
As true the TrueStreet Media wrote this,
when provided with info and this is actually
crazy, assuming it's real. Always question. They could
be saying this to scare you or saying
it to get you in a certain direction.
But when provided with info implying that it
will be replaced
with a new artificial intelligence system in tests,
the Claude
Opus four,
quote, will often attempt to blackmail
anthropic
employees
by threatening to reveal
extramarital
affairs if they replace the AI model.
Just like every other tool we use. Right,
guys?
My god. Now that overlaps with the thing
I was just talking about with the the
eagle eye mission impossible kind of point to
where
if that's even like, so what we're talking
about is like a test run. Right? Where
they have a thing they're building and they're
they're
switching it out. I mean, it's a big
thing. Cloned Office is one of these different
you know, you have Google. You have XAI.
These major billion dollar companies. The point
is if that's what's happening on one of
these, imagine if all of a sudden one
that they're using, like the bots involved with
your general service administration or what he's using
on XAI,
all of a sudden just started
blackmailing people.
What if that's already happening? Or what if
it's what if that's simply a tool being
used by the Israeli intelligence and they're doing
you know, there's all these different ways to
look at it. The point is that if
that's already possible
to the point to where it is threatening
to
expose x, y, and z if you do
not allow it to take more control or
in get it inside the you know, have
force Elon to bring it into our government.
You know what I mean? Like, there's so
many ways to look at it. The bottom
line is what the she's highlighting here is
that that's not something we should accept at
face value. We should be running screaming from
something like that, and instead, we're running toward
it
as if we need to rush instead of
take our time because they'll do it first.
I mean, it's just it's absolutely it's lunacy
to me.
But think about how that overlaps with where
we're going and what they're trying to accomplish.
Of course, they pretend I mean, even even
Elon Musk has said more than once that
this is gonna destroy the world while we
have to do it the right way. It's
like,
it's just it's exhausting to see how clearly
this is coming. And now
MJ truth points out, not gonna lie, this
kinda disturbs me. Now to me, there's no
way around this. Sean Ryan, guys, this guy
is over just recently got caught in a
massive, massive embarrassing lie of a story around
the email they claimed they got, that they
proved they actually wrote out and nobody actually
had it. I mean, these these are operatives,
in my opinion. They're blatantly lying. Remember they
told you about the fog and the drones,
all the talk about the bombs in Iran?
What happened with that? I guess they just
they and Alex was a a very clear
aspect of telling that story every day I
talked about it, and they just dropped it
and moved forward because that's what they do.
But so now you got Tucker talking to
him, and it says, Tucker Carlson says he's
had a conversation with people involved with Neuralink.
So Elon Musk's Neuralink. And they are pushing
it because AI is at this point
beyond human control. So this has suddenly become
a narrative people are talking about, and it's
lying to those who created it. All I
want you to think about don't blindly accept
this. This could be the very lie they
use to drive you into something, but consider
the possibility of that, almost the inevitability of
that, and then ask yourself why we should
even go forward at all. Why we would
allow them to keep pushing in this direction.
He says, why not just turn it off?
Tucker asked a prominent person in the AI
field. This person said, even now, we can't
be sure the machine is telling us the
truth about where its power is coming from.
What? I mean, I don't even know if
I believe that. But think about the implications
of that,
which would then suggest that maybe Elon can
is who Elon or whoever else is not
actually even in control of these things anymore,
which is what a lot of us have
been talking about for such a long time.
It's insane.
And I'll include an interview
that I had with Whitney from a while
back. Oh, yes. I knew that happened.
Glitched out of me, and I missed his
tab there.
So this was just the point again.
Google's v o three is already deep faking
all of YouTube's as they call it smooth
brain content. You know, dumb cat videos and
whatever else. The point is people are being
tricked.
Getting millions of views with fake information, but,
you know, benign things like a new phone
that doesn't exist, things like that. And so
nobody's, like, crying foul because it's not well,
how do we not know it's how do
we know it's not going on somewhere else?
What if it's happening right now around political
information or or videos you think you know
or information that's being altered to show you
something different than what happened in the past
or a thousand other possibilities.
I guess we don't care. I guess we're
all just having too much fun with the
Internet. You know? It's I know you're out
there. I know you guys listening care. Speak
up. Convin show people the concerns of this
and then show them what they can do
to actually have an effect on the outcome.
Now Whitney Webb interviews from 2023.
CIA Mossad linked surveillance systems quietly installed
throughout The United States.
We were trying we've been calling this out
for a long time. So the overlap with
that is to show you that we're dealing
with this
surveillance Panopticon
that's being built with Israeli
intelligence,
US intelligence,
and, you know, any number of UK, inter
they're all overlapped in this massive Panopticon they're
building. And then you want you have to
ask whether, okay. Taking a step back again,
what if that's building out because of what
the AI is making them build out? What
if they're all being blackmailed? You know? And
then you could you know? For just for
sake of conversation.
That's alarming to think about. And that's not
just the plot of some crazy movie, guys.
That's obviously very
feasible,
especially if you wanna consider that it's simply
a government like Israel that's using that and
pretending to be AI and blackmailing everybody to
do what they want. Really no different than
what they're already doing, if you understand it.
But so overlapping that with the the building
out of the surveillance network and how that
overlaps with artificial intelligence and the new system
they're rolling out and recognize that Palantir, which
is a central part of that surveillance, is
already dovetailed with Israel. And they're actually testing
out their artificial intelligence to kill people on
the ground, the strategic partnership, where they they
rolled out in January,
like, in the midst of the ongoing genocide.
And Derek's amazing article you have to read,
Welcome to the Palantir World Order, is very
important. I mean, it really does break down
all the different overlapping
overlapping parts, how it comes together.
Pretty terrifying.
Now just a couple other overarching points as
well.
Realize this is all over the place. This
is 05/19/2025.
Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition
cameras. So here's the real question.
Did they secretly do so when they got
caught, or is this literally everywhere? I mean,
that's the only they throw you that bone
because they want you to think it's the
only spot.
I mean, come on. Are we really this
naive to think they're not actively using biometrics
and facial recognition all over this country?
In fact, I can prove to you that's
happening. We already saw that with Palantir. We
saw it with Oracle. We saw it with
COVID. It was already happening. It's been there
for a long time. So what this shows
you is they're now dripping this out slowly
just like the Tesla or the Cybertruck. Remember,
when they go well, we had to use
it to scan the area to find out
who we with the with the bombing out
front of the Trump Tower. Remember? And it
turned out that they had all the information.
The cameras were activated, and they
that's happening every time you're in that car.
Just like this.
Police secretly monitoring you in New Orleans with
facial recognition cameras. I think that's happening all
over the place.
Or Google, May thirteenth, caught tracking users even
incognito mode. Oh my god. I'm shocked. It's
the same thing every stupid time. We tell
you they they go, we'll never do that.
And then we go, probably. And then later,
you find out, oh, they were doing that.
And then every single time there's somebody out
there that goes, well, they told us they
wouldn't do it. They promised that they're gonna
now paying $1,375,000,000
in price. Yeah. But I'm sure they made
50,000,000,000 in that time frame. So who cares?
Right? Like, Wells Fargo and their issue. They
just pay it out every time. They literally
factor it in at the beginning of the
year as the cost of doing business.
You see, if you make that much money,
who cares? Right? That's how they see it.
They never get held legally accountable for violating
the law.
And we just talked about this one, the
Ford Panopticon,
which is the always on tracking we just
talked about, which is here's the patent. If
you wanna look further, we talked about it
in the last show.
Always on tracking. And not only that, but
phones, devices, other cars. I mean, they're building
out the actual Panopticon,
but the Ford Panopticon.
And then, of course,
the White House,
May fourteenth,
has scrapped the plan to block data brokers
from selling your sensitive data. You know? Why?
Because your sensitive data is what's training out
their AI models that'll probably destroy the world
or not.
Bottom line is that is exactly the opposite
of what we all wanted, exactly the opposite
of what was promised, but you won't hear
that from the mainstream alternative media. And I'll
include this article we went over not too
long ago
called the American Panopticon.
The Trump administration is pulling data on experts,
and experts fear what comes next. Now it's
like any other mainstream article. They have plenty
of propaganda
they're trying to push just like most of
the mainstream alternate media or if not all.
The point is about understanding the the the
data points and how it comes together, and
it's well done. We went over this in
a in a show,
not that long ago.
The point is it's building into something that
is very much being
you know, like, look at it like here
in the movies you're referencing. You could argue
that it'd be that it could be used
to, let's say, keep Americans safe or whatever
that means, or used to go after Americans'
enemies, whatever that means.
But I think
if we understand history at all, that never
happens. Just like the war on terror became
the war of terror
regardless of what happened, but it ended up
being aimed at Americans, and you can prove
that. As Whitney's covered many times over, it
got turned in and looked at you from
day one. And as she said before, even
with COVID, the your body is the new
battlefield. Right? The war on the the pathogen,
it's always directed at you.
This is where it's coming.
Now we're gonna get into the immigration overlap
with that Panopticon, how that's being rationalized, justified
of using the conversation of immigration. Before we
get there, though, let's take another side step
into a techno
the technocratic sort
of futuristic
perspective. Well, I shouldn't even say that seeing
as how these are not in the future.
It's happening right now, but the way most
people perceive it. Brown researchers developed brain inspired
wireless system
to gather data from salt sized sensors. Now
you know as well as I, this is
not new. This may be a new direction
for the the way it's being used. This
stuff has been going on for a long
time.
Now in fact,
I didn't actually grab it but let me
I'm I've got this video. I always keep
it saved in here.
I'll play you some of this that I
that I I opened with but I'll play
you the
actual part where he's discussing this.
And this is about the smart dust. Now
this is about 20 years old, the tech
he's talking about,
before we get into what the current thing
they're showing you. I always think it's relevant
to show this because they really do frame
this stuff as some kind of a brand
new, you know, cutting edge, and it's been
going on a long time.
Talking to
together stage for this sort of stuff.
And you haven't really seen anything yet.
So
this is closer to the end of the
vision. This is this powder sized chip,
and that's a salt crystal. So this is
a small thing.
It's something called the Mu chip from Hitachi.
It's the smallest commercially available RFID system in
the world,
and can be pulse powered by radio waves.
It doesn't require a battery. You can literally
scatter this stuff like dust
or embed it into a sheet of paper.
And you know what the really interesting thing
about this technology is? This was commercially released
ten years
ago. This video was over ten years old.
So
the inevitability of Smart Dust. So what is
Smart Dust? Well, Smart Dust, of of course
isn't a new concept. It's the originated with
DARPA back in the nineties,
and it's general purpose computing, sensors,
wireless network
networking all bundled up into millimeter scale sensor
modes drifting in the air currents,
flecks of computing power settling on your skin,
ingested,
monitoring you inside and out.
And if you don't think that's possible,
this is the Michigan MicroMote.
It's a cubic millimeter in size,
and in deference to the speaker before, yes
it runs an ARM processor.
It's a tiny computer and it features data
processing,
data storage, wireless comms, and it's probably as
close to the true
smart dust vision from the early DARPA days
as we've come so far.
They're designed to harvest energy from the environment
around them and to communicate via mesh network.
And of course the energy is the key
problem with it. Can make the computing small,
the energy is hard.
Anyone that's actually taken a laptop or their
cell phone apart will know that the the
size of the board compared to the size
of the batteries is
actually quite well suit.
And by reflecting or absorbing.
You know, there really is a lot of
cool stuff in this video. I will I
always usually I typically show you that first
part.
There's a lot of really interesting stuff in
this in this in the video, though. So
what I want what I wanna show you
make sure make sure you watch through that
if you wanna understand how long it's been
going on. And in fact, here, we go
back to that.
Oh, yeah. I'll just bring it up again.
I think I can do it right here.
MakerCon. There it is. So just to show
you, this this this is a symposium from
ten years ago, and what he's referencing is
over ten years old. So even that shows
you what their the smart dust from DARPA
is over 20 years old. I mean, think
about how crazy that is. I've showed you
the the the the dust networks conversation.
I'll include this for you to watch. Make
sure you check it out. It's pretty wild.
But also this one,
Dust Networks. It's an old channel where there's
only a few videos left, but it talks
about this. You can see them spreading the
dust right there. That's it's just smart dust.
This was utilized by the US government. This
some of these are thirteen, fourteen years old.
They were using to attract,
shipping lanes. I mean, it was they we're
talking about literal smart dust, like, spread in
the air. I mean, even then, actually, funny,
all this stuff always comes to mind.
Where was that? Wells Fargo.
Shoot.
MEMS.
There's that Wells Fargo. Yeah. It looks right
there.
Oh, no. That's not the right one. Shoot.
What was that? I have I forgot what
the name of the show was. But, you
know, Wells Fargo has the yeah. Right there.
Involved in patents related to microelectrical mechanical services
technology systems. Excuse me. Specifically, in the context
of magnetic MEMS sensors. Smart dust is what
it is. Here's the patent. Oh, yeah. I
can just do that.
There it is.
And you can see right here.
Where was it?
Oh, I thought it said that in this.
Guess not. The the point though is it
says, disclosure related to micro, MEMS, magnetic MEMS
sensors include a subs
oh, actually, no. This is even the wrong
one. This is the right discussion.
But the one that we were looking at
was ones Wells Fargo were using
on the patent to discuss using an ATM.
Anyway, I I'm getting sidetracked. I just find
this to be so fascinating. It's in so
insane how real and obvious this stuff is.
So the point is that they were talking
about using Smart Dust in a Wells Fargo
transaction at the at the
ATM to where, like, it spits it out.
It checks your biometrics. I mean, it's legitimately
what and this this was a few years
ago. All this stuff is very real time.
So, anyway, the point is I'll include all
that for you to check out. Understand that
this is not something that is a a
distant, you know, feud. It's right now. Now
really quickly, sidestep back, somebody posted in the
chat. This is, the v o three deepfake
conversation. So check out this video. Apparently, this
is 100% artificial intelligence.
Let me grab it real quick. Here we
go.
And this is how great this is how
the the level of this stuff at this
point.
On our way to Jurassic Park. I am
so excited. I've always wanted to go, and
finally we are doing it. It's gonna be
great. Right, Jason? Yeah. I can't wait. Okay.
Bye.
Alright. We're here.
Okay, guys. Nice and easy or he will
definitely wipe your hand off. Got it? Alright.
Who's first?
Now now I would say that you can
kinda on some of those, you can tell.
Right? Like, it's all just barely, but that's
the point. This is the kind of stuff
that random people online are using. Think about
what the intelligence level is using or have
been using for twenty years as far as
it use that's how it tends to go.
Right?
Okay. That's how Oop. That's not the right
one. Where were we? Here we go.
So continuing forward,
back to the point on this. So knowing
that that's 20 old and what they're working
on, Brown researchers developed brain inspired wireless system.
Here's what it says. Writing in Nature and
this is the actual study. You can read
Nature electronics.
The research team described the novel approach for
wireless communication networks that can efficiently
transmit,
receive, and decode data from thousands of microelectric
chips that are each no larger than a
grain of salt.
That means much, much smaller in most cases.
The sensor net network is designed
so the chips can be implanted into the
body or integrated into wearable devices or
I mean, implanted the body at the same
point, but not necessarily, like, in skin. Like,
these are things that can be in your
bloodstream, for example.
Each submillimeter
sized silicone sensor mimics how neurons in the
brain communicate through spikes of electronic electrical activity.
The sensors detect specific events as spikes and
then transmit that data wirelessly in real time
using radio waves, saving both energy and bandwidth.
Interesting.
The radio frequency transmission and let me let
you understand. This is one aspect of this.
We've talked about the magno magnetogenetics,
the optogenetics, and it's a similar overlap. In
most cases, the the magnetogenetics,
the optogenetics is just, like, the more of
the future, the way that it's going that
are that that makes these things usable at
a much larger, lar longer
possibility. Now there was one other I'm trying
to remember the other one as well.
I I meant the all of them. The
they're different uses for different site for how
the distance would be. And I think what's
interesting is this has been going on for
a long time. And that does overlap with
the Charles late
Charles Lieber, Bob Langer
overlap of the work we've talked about for
a long time.
Actually, I should just do that. I think
I've got that one.
There's that one. But I think there's one
that I talked about where I just did
the Liber Langer.
Oh, that's a good one too.
Grab these. I'll include all these if you
wanna go back into this stuff.
I think it's important.
Okay. So these ones I'll include for you.
Bob Langer, the coronavirus common denominator ties to
Charles Lieber, as well as
same image, but this one's the Charles Lieber
connection from nanotechnology
to COVID nineteen to technocracy.
Tell you, we've been seeing this coming for
a long time.
Now this tech is interesting.
What it says, the researchers say the work
marks a significant step in large scale wireless
sensor technology
and may one day help, like tomorrow, yesterday,
twenty years ago,
shape how scientists collect and interpret information from
these sensors, silicon device these little silicon devices,
especially since electronic sensors have become ubiquitous
as a result of modern technology.
Yeah. What a coincidence.
We live in a world of sensors, they
write.
They all they are all over the place.
They're certainly in our automobiles.
They are in so many places of work
and increasingly getting into our homes. The most
demanding environment for these sensors will always be
inside the human body. So So the question
is is are we have we already been
there for a long time? And is this
the step into normalizing us with the idea
that we're all ubiquitously being censored and monitored
inside? Certainly possible.
That's why the researchers believe the system can
help lay the foundation for the next generation
of implantable and wearable biomedical sensors. Because that's
what's happening for sure. Right? We all want
that.
I don't I mean, I think that most
people are pretty concerned about the way this
is going. Doesn't mean they're gonna stop.
This is a growing need in medicine for
micro devices, or there is, they write, for
micro devices that are efficient, unobtrusive,
and unnoticeable,
but that also operate as part of a
large as a large ensembles
to to map physiological
activity across an entire area of interest.
Surveillance.
Funny way to say that. Yeah. Or, you
know, physiological, but it's the same idea. It's
it's it broadens into something much bigger than
what they're highlighting. And this is where you
overlap with the question, you know, or rather
you know, you could make it about physiological
stuff. You know, your heartbeat. But we already
know that that's not the only thing that
can be received and transmitted as we've talked
about with the,
here on this one as well.
And this this is a really interesting one.
Flipping a switch inside the head
from the Rockefeller Institute. Now this is I
won't go into it all, but that's talking
about the ferritin nanoparticle injections. And that's talking
about the idea of using these ferritin,
you know, optogenetics, magnetogenetics,
and the ferritin that's either injected into your
body or naturally there to be able to
manipulate rather rather being able to add enough
to be able to manipulate your body, your
feelings, your thoughts, possibly movements, and in real
time relay
the data being absorbed by your ocular
nerve, by your eyes. That is all written
in this. It's insane. And this is from
2017,
being able to control the mice. That's what
it says.
The point, though, is that all this has
been going on quite a long time. And
this is what they're talking about is all
the sensors inside and what they could do.
And I think it's worth considering that that's
already happening. That's why it says research believed
the system can help lay the foundation for
the next generation.
And then the point was to map physiological
activity across the entire area, you know, or
everything else too, and relay that information. Now
here, of course,
is sensor networks designed to so the chips
can be implanted into the body or integrated
into wearable devices. But, weirdly, they use an
image as an illustration of these devices implanted
in your brain.
Funny how they don't say that when they
show that but then they, you know, I
I think there's a deliberate effort to make
it not concerning for people, my opinion.
The sensors are able to use as little
energy as they do because external transceivers
supply wireless power to the sensors as they
transmit their data. Now you can go back
a long way, and the argument is how
do we make these things function without, you
know, something else. And the first discussion was
your body's motion. That's the DARPA point. Right?
Or or something, you know,
different kinds of shortwave stuff. Now this, I
argue, is it is possible because of the
world they built out around us. Maybe that's
why. So now you have a discussion where
you have external transceiver supplying wireless power to
these things that are possibly already in your
body. Meaning they just need to be within
range of the energy waves. Now what are
we talking about building out? Five g technology,
which requires those at every single corner. Now
it starts to come together in obvious ways,
and it says this ability
up the oh, did I miss a part?
Meaning, they just need to be within range
of the energy wave sent out to be
charged.
This ability to operate without needing to be
plugged into a power source or battery make
them convenient
and versatile for use in many different situations.
It's been going on a long time. These
re the researchers say the next steps include
optimizing the system for reduced power consumption and
exploring broader applications beyond
neurotechnology,
because that's what this is about. Neuroscience,
neurotechnology
overlap with the neuro weapon conversation,
including these smart is smart dust already in
use to the population and was COVID nineteen,
quotes,
an attempted experimental next step? Every day, that
question becomes more relevant to me.
Also, this one from twenty twenty four December,
make America healthy again, in parentheses,
with GMOs, pharmaceuticals, and AI nanotech. Not that
I want that, but that's what the reality
is in my opinion, and partisan implosion.
Now, weirdly, we talk about in that discussion
about the neurological
overlap. Right? And so what we're I what
I'm always discussing
is you know, really ask, you know, is
it possible that we're being experimented on? I
mean, you know, my my thought. I think
that's, if not one of the primary
objectives, the primary out objective of what COVID
nineteen was. We were being tested,
experimented on. And, I mean, if you look
at the full body of work from all
the different scientists that are continuing to prove
that there are contaminations,
you know, altering DNA. If you look at
it all, it's
it comes together in ways that are pocketed.
I mean, it seems like there were different
controls and different experiments.
You could decide for yourself. Clearly, we all
think I think we all know now that
these things are deadly.
But
overlapping with this and understanding
the the deeper conversation about,
things like this, this is Charles
Charles Lieber,
virus sized transistors. We talked about this before,
02/2011.
A leading scientist in nanotechnology in 2011
was working on what he called virus sized
transistors.
And in this conversation, it became it it
wrote very clearly that
the and it when a man made structure
is as small as a virus or bacteria,
it can behave the way biological structures do.
And they talk about using lipid nanoparticles and
they say, this is exactly this is the
stepping stone to where they use for COVID
nineteen, and the question is, was there more
involved? Is it not possible that virus sized
transistors were exactly what happened? Did it get
out? Did it cause sickness? They blamed it
on a pathogen? I don't know. The point
is interesting that he, right in the beginning
of COVID, got shuttled away under some allegation
of treason, never stopped working, by the way,
as as,
the b lady was talking about, that very
clearly he never stopped working. How was he
how was he being charged with treason and
investigated and never stopped his word research with
China? Because we're being lied to. I think
that's very obvious. And right now he's out
now and still working on very dangerous tech
you know, this kind of stuff.
So my point is, if we think about
the testing and how long it's been going
on, remember we talked about the baffling, here's
Canada, the baffling brain illness. Well, what's interesting
is you dive deeper, it's a mystery neurological
illness. But what are we just talking about?
We're talking about these neuro overlaps or these
these smart dust nanotech that's supposed to be
working with your neuro. I mean, it's not
possible that this is an example of that
hurting people in the experimental process. Just a
thought. Not claiming that you should blindly accept
that. Interesting to think about.
And now, of course, overlapping that with with
COVID nineteen, the potential use of some kind
of a biological element. We talked about this
from the MIT study. New aerosolized MRA delivering
nanoparticles can vaccinate or they can eliminate.
And you can read more about this. That's
not my opinion. This is the Koch Institute
saying this lipid can enable us to deliver
mRNA to the lung much more efficiently than
any other delivery system that has been reported
so far.
Here's the MIT article, one of them, new
new nano particles can perform gene editing in
the lungs.
Yeah. Exactly. That's 2023.
And engineers create an inhalable form of messenger
RNA. That's twenty nineteen.
So you can now you could argue this
is only from the element of the the
health side of it, but maybe there's much
more going on here.
And this is just recent. We already talked
about this.
Self amplifying.
Trump administration fast tracks
controversial self amplifying mRNA vaccine.
Hard not to see the overlaps.
Now here's an interesting point just coming back
to the spike protein production. This is Lindsey
RN telling you that she's been testing her
blood since she got these injections, and to
this very day
it's still
mat producing a lot of spike protein.
How long ago were you vaccinated?
My first vaccine was 12/23/2020,
and my last vaccine was 12/29/2021.
And I am still producing spike proteins continuously.
I'm at currently day 1,542,
which blows the Yale study out of the
water. And I was a participant in that
study, but they didn't want to put my
data in there. I wonder why.
Yeah. So And that's about how long it
stays in your blood. Right? And what we
understand now and this is what worries me.
If she's still producing spike protein, I don't
understand how that makes sense without something like
an internal bio nano platform.
Like, why would your body continue to make
the even with the self amplifying.
At some point, that stops. At a point,
at this point, as I understand it, this
point, it's hard to not see that as
something that has been put into her that
produces
the spike protein, not the training of your
body to react to something which then produces
the spike protein, which is what they claim,
right, which then eventually the original idea was
one one time and it's over. We know
that didn't happen. But even then, the argument
was that peters out.
That worries me about the internal
the the DARPA discussion.
Right? But What Lindsay just said that's why
I asked her the question.
She's fifteen hundred days out, and she's still
making spike protein.
That is
what is the scariest
shit I've ever heard.
And that's why this becomes
so you know what Jay Bhattachary and
Bobby Kennedy and all of these people need
to do
is they need to spend some money
studying this disease.
We have to
because we gotta figure out why is she
producing spike,
where what's it coming from, and then what
can we do to interfere,
to to break the cycle?
It should be an absolute priority
instead of the NIH.
You know that they were spending millions of
dollars
on grants
studying vaccine hesitancy?
Now the point for me is that they
they're going we have to figure out why
that's happening. I agree. I mean, it doesn't
make much sense what we understand unless there's
something like, we had George Webb interview where
his the way he framed it is he
thinks the original shots were sort of the
the platform or rather the, you know,
what do you call it?
Basically, the the what's the the the right
term? So let you and your drilling, if
there's a term for the the thing, like,
he's putting the platform, and then the whatever
they do next will be the drill. That's
as an analogy sense. Right? So they set
people up for that internal Vivo nano platform,
and then that's whatever.
You know, that's it's it seems to line
up, and they can then change it outside.
That is the actual tech that they've been
studying.
So let's not forget, by the way,
that in 2020,
right at the beginning of the day, they
thought they were talking about the conversation of
potentially self spreading vaccines.
Since the outbreak of COVID nineteen,
the word virus has been dominating media headlines
as well as our daily lives.
Did you know that one approach that has
been proposed to control virally transmitted diseases is
by releasing a virally transmitted vaccine.
Unlike traditional vaccines,
infectious vaccines do not require any individual consent.
As always for the podcast pointing out that
they're showing these things passing over to children,
pregnant women with, as they say, with no
consent.
And this is not like some danger. They're
talking about this as the the possible future
way.
Infectious solutions are also being developed for food
and agriculture
and are currently making their way through the
regulatory approval process. Which usually means they've been
done and and tested and worked on. You
know, these things are out there. And so
if you understand why it's so concerning,
you wonder whether it's there's no putting that
genie back in the bottle. So just to
skip to the end, you can see this
was a symposium in Europe of 2020 that
had involved everybody. This was a massive conversation.
The EuroScience open forum.
And now here is Bill Gates talking about
how the the self assembly nanoparticles in the
shots we're discussing. Making the mRNA
is really easy and really cheap, and that's
the magic of this thing. But there's no
doubt in the next five years,
we can you know, we just need to
mess around. There's a lot of lipid nanoparticles,
and some are very self assembly. And there's
no inherent reason it's not thermal stable, it's
not cheap, and it's not scalable. And Yeah.
We used to mess around. Right? And let's
not forget that he had meetings with Donald
Trump more than once now. And what was
the main thing? Well, they're excited. He's excited
about the new direction. That's what he said.
That and that that was more than one
meeting now. And all the they all push
back like, oh, that's just a I forget
what different anything he knew was from the
ride. Apparently, not outraged that he had a
meeting with Bill Gates more than once. And
then after that meeting, the Stargate program and
everything else is I it's just it's amazing
what people can choose to ignore. You know,
BlackRock's the villain of the world until they
work with XAI and then ignore it. You
know? It it it's just it's willful ignorance.
But
important to highlight.
Fox News yesterday, USC's cases of new COVID
nineteen variant linked to surge in China. Feels
very similar. But like I said every time,
note it.
Make sure you understand that this is what
they're saying. Do not do their job for
them.
Interesting to see.
N b one eight one, I guess. With
everything that's coming, it wouldn't be hard to
see this being used and having people that
were the most resistant suddenly on board with
doing something because Trump tells you this time
it's real. How easy that would trick people
right now.
Oh, by the way, in case you forgot,
I'll include this study that I was recently
mentioning from the ionitis group, age stratified and
check-in check infection fatality rate of COVID nineteen
in the non elderly population, which if you
forgot,
at a global level,
before
injections were given, the infection fatality rate may
have been as low as point zero three
percent
and point zero seven. So point zero three
for 59
and point zero seven for 69, which is
way less than the flu from the beginning.
And the point is that if you understand
how crazy that is, that because of those
numbers, that shows you that ninety four percent
of the entire
population on the globe
were within that category.
And that yeah. You got the Imperial College
of London lie that we now know was
just them lying to you, and no one's
ever held them accountable for that. And they
built it up to be the worst dangerous
thing. They jam these down your throat. They
hurt your children. They locked the world down,
and they tested on you.
Trump to Biden, back to Trump. And it's
still the same thing, and no one's been
held accountable. No one's gone to jail, but
let's all pretend like that means what you
want it to mean.
Very clear.
I just want you to remember that. That's
this is the if I can tell, the
highest level reality. This is a massive,
basically, this is the culmination of all the
information that we had up until this point.
No one has retracted this. Nobody has challenged
it. They still move forward.
It's pretty wild.
So keeping all this in mind, back to
the
overarching point from before.
Now the the obvious health side of it
is very relevant, but I think it's much
bigger than that, and these are all aspects
of it.
So we've talked about the Doge part. We've
talked about the surveillance, the aspect, and how
it overlaps.
What what we're gonna show you here is
a quick another couple quick points about the
the way that partisans perceive this,
but also how this overlaps with the surveillance
then dovetails into the immigration, which then overlaps
with Israel. Now we talked about this great
article. I I recommend everybody read this, Strategic
Culture Foundation, which by the way right now
is completely blacked out of you're you're not
allowed to post their links on Twitter. Not
at all. Not like you post it. It
doesn't give you the drop down. No. Nothing.
It says you're not allowed to post these
on Twitter. I just talked about this. Totally
not censoring based on ideological information. Right?
Great platform. Check it out. The tar and
this and you can I'm sure you'll be
shocked to find out why. Doge, aka the
deep state made official? You see why. The
point is it's a very compelling article showing
you that what you whatever you wanna think
the deep state was, we all generally have
some kind of consistent idea, unelected power structure.
But what we all kind of highlight the
things we all gen generally seem to agree
on, they make it a a really compelling
argument that is that not what Doge is
representing right now? Is that not what they're
doing? And I'm not even talking about debatable
things, like what we all agree on. It's
it's very well done. It's an important thing
to consider. Because frankly, if that that's what
we've talked about. Right? As the coming out
of the shadows.
Right? The deep state, well, just going, okay.
Well, now this we're we're gonna become that.
We're gonna show you this is what and
they're not calling it that.
But this is now this is the deep
the official reality. We're enshrining that sort of
like the Patriot Act, the War Powers Act.
Plenty of a points where, as Ron Paul
points out, instead of or like the Smith
Monn Modernization Act. Right? There's a problem they
notice. Right? Well, people don't
like that your the the potential for propagandizing
Americans. Right? And so they address that problem
because we know it's happening. It's illegal. And
so what do they do?
They pass a law. And the law makes
it legal
for that to happen, but as long as
they claim national security.
So the problem was that it was illegal,
and we call it out. And their solution
is to make it not illegal anymore.
Yay.
Or wait a minute. Did you just he
said it doesn't make much sense. So this
is what we keep seeing them. They this
is what your government does left and right.
Right? So we all hate the deep state,
so let's just turn it into something that
we enshrine as official. Maybe don't call it
that. It's pretty basic, and you've seen it
happen throughout our lives. Read this. It's important.
But on that note and then here's my
coverage of that of that article in this
show, the Doge the deep Doge state, I
called it.
Let's talk about that and overlapping all this,
but first, some of the partisan coverage of
this. Now main point after everything we just
talked about.
How I find it hard to believe that
anybody can see what's happening and pretend that
their goal was still to cut costs.
I mean, guys, it's it's actually fundamentally the
opposite at this point. They spent more. They
aren't they haven't achieved pretty much
a fraction of what they claim they would
even from Doge's perspective.
So here's what I think is fascinating.
Clint comes out and says, the richest man
in America, a guy who builds spaceships and
robots and underground tunnels and brain chips, so
we're told anyway, and AI superintelligence,
couldn't reform the government.
He couldn't cut any spending.
In fact, we are on track to spend
more this year than ever.
Yeah. And I've been saying that since the
beginning because that hasn't changed.
So you're gonna frame it as that he,
you know, like, so the idea is that
he tried and just couldn't get it done,
therefore, were
I mean, why would that be that's a
self serving assumption. Or he lied to you
all, and that's the hardest thing to admit,
and so you just gave him the benefit
of the doubt. Blakely says, are we still
pretending that this was ever a plan to
cut cut waste? I mean, at the point
that you agree with it on, you know
that's at least a possibility that gets right
there, the point is that it's like, that's
not on the table even though it obviously
is one of the most logical possibilities.
She says, Musk is one of the largest
military contractors with the government, and look at
that. We're spending more.
See? I mean, it seems pretty basic.
He says, it seems like the f his
efforts were sincere in terms of cutting.
Okay. That's a that that's a personal emotional
argument. It seems to me the exact opposite
based on the facts,
but it says having the entire GOP aside
from Massey work against him makes it impossible.
What's weird is that he seemed to love
Massey, but everyone else now calling Massey a
commie traitor.
Know, not everyone else, but the, you know,
the the main Republicans. So it's funny that
you can have that difference and not recognize
that the main leading Republicans are not on
the same side as you, that do not
care about the same. I just don't know
why people get blind themselves to a partisan
game.
Blakely says, they never even attempted to go
after the Pentagon, which literally should have been
where they started.
No response to that. Right? Because, I mean,
it's I think it's transparent, my personal opinion.
Jimmy tags what he says there and says,
ultimately,
Doge was a scam and a smokescreen.
Then he sees it mostly because Doge didn't
audit the Pentagon, which was on purpose.
The Pentagon is ground zero for waste, fraud,
abuse, and now they're going to increase that
fraud by $160,000,000,000
while cutting health care.
Winning promises kept, you know, just because
it's his thing. So that's my point from
before is that it's it's not it's not
about America First. It's clearly for a lot
of them about Trump first. Whatever he does,
it is the thing we all wanted, period.
And that's what they're all adhered to, and
I don't think that's even remotely the majority
anymore.
Musk is a huge defense contractor, so there's
that. Clearly, it's time for MAGA to revolt.
Will they?
And he says, if they all demanded immediate
action, I think they could prevail, but too
far too much trust the plan. It's a
very strange response from someone who also seems
to be slightly trusting the plan. I said,
you're giving him the benefit of the doubt,
which we should never do with government.
I think it's spectacularly
obvious that cutting spending was just the claim
to get many to cheer and follow as
they build out what we all can now
see.
I think so, anyway. Many called this out
before this election, in fact.
And here is what Shannon Joy had to
say. This is anomaly doing the same kind
of thing. Elon Musk basically confirms that the
GOP failed to implement Doge cuts.
Right? So now it's the GOP, which is
so the Republicans. But if if they are
against him, then they're rhinos. So it's still
somehow not our side. It's impossible to follow
along with that at the time. But it's
simply saying, I agree fully with this take.
And it's Elon Musk saying, yes. I
I think the the
the appetite to cut spending in congress was
so much lower than ever he ever had
anticipated.
Ah, so he really wanted to, and they
just wouldn't let him.
Guys, how many times have I gone over
this? Right? I mean, just doing the same
thing. How many times have I done that?
We wanted to, but, oh, they all just
couldn't. They wouldn't let me. I'm the I'm
the, you know, forlorn
hero. It's just I don't know why we
always fall for this stuff. Is it possible?
Sure. But everything we have in front of
us shows you that that's a self serving
argument, that he tried and they wouldn't let
him. Guys, they're spending more. He's spending more.
They're rolling out $500,000,000,000
projects. They're not doing what they claimed they
were doing. Donald just done incredible work, he
says, but the GOP has failed. Right. So
Trump and Trump and Elon, they did it,
but everyone else screwed him over,
I guess. I mean, it's certainly one of
the possibilities, but it it unless you look
at everything else that's been going on and
can prove a thousand ways over that they
have been involved you know, they're also doing
the same things, lying about it left and
right.
Shannon says, Doge was a fake ASSPR
campaign. Oh my god. How do people not
see this BS from Trump and Musk? She
sees it. They're playing you. Don't be a
chump.
I agree.
Oh, this I think it was just one
I was just showing you her thing.
And then here's the same comment from Clint
saying, the richest man in America, which by
the way, I don't even know if we
can prove that. I think there's a lot
of
assumptions going on. You know, the idea is
that's the claim. I've I've seen a lot
of information that challenges that, but, you know,
it's it's hard to tell. The bottom line
is saying he couldn't do it, then we're
in trouble. Right?
Poncho the ghost says he knew how to
cut money. He found waste. He that he
wasn't the problem.
Congress has done next to nothing to follow-up
on what he's found
about,
sock sack payments, Social Security,
benefits for illegals,
crap for an aid. And we've gone over
each one of these things and shown you
how they're just as much involved with most
of the, excuse me, most of this stuff.
Our reps are representing the other interest,
not ours, which, yeah, I agree. Exactly.
However, they're all doing the same thing too.
They're all it's it's it's the benefit of
the doubt
to argue that they wouldn't do it. Or
remember what we said right in the beginning?
Again, it's funny how much of this comes
back into mind. What did we say right
in the beginning? That they're gonna we're gonna
try our hardest or the confirmations.
That they knew where this was going because
my opinion, they're all one thing. And so
the idea is that we were gonna get
the good people in there, but, oh, congress
just wouldn't let us.
Well, same thing here. If the argument is
simply
that he would have, he tried, but the
other people wouldn't let him, well, you don't
think they know that? You don't think or
then why wouldn't the case be executive order
everything like he'd telling Trump to do? Like,
it's just so transparent that you, in some
cases, think he could do whatever he wants
all the time. And then other cases, when
it doesn't work out, you go, well, his
hands are bound. Well, how do those two
things make sense together?
And then, of course, Clint says, I'm not
blaming Elon. Yeah. Yeah. That one was very
clear. Trust. We can see that you're going
out of your way not to blame the
one person who seems to be the most
involved with this. HealthRanger does the same thing
in a much more transparent way and says,
I truly feel sorry for Elon Musk right
now.
Wow.
He says he tried to do the right
thing.
Once in a lifetime opportunity to really slash
big government and dough. Look. Look. Is it
possible that's exactly yes? I've said from the
beginning, I hope you're right. Right? From day
one, much more opportunity for possibility when everything
hadn't happened yet. Certainly could have been the
case that he really wanted to. How are
we still pretending this? How is that still
my my opinion, he doesn't. That's what he
wants to project because this is what gets
you reach.
My thing is, guys, come on. Elon Musk
truly try oh, he just try they it
just seems like a even if it's the
case, we can't prove that.
So you're going along with what you want,
the self serving argument that makes your I
mean,
I just don't understand why this people you're
putting out a personal opinion based on your
emotional belief in something. This is not a
religion.
Right? We're not in kindergarten. We should not
be acting this way. And it says
to slash big government and doze the heck
out of the system, but the swamp won.
And Elon was suppressed, and now nobody's going
to slash big government.
Like I said before, folks, nothing changes until
the collapse. See? And this is where we're
going. We're there now. We're getting the argument
from people about destroying the country, rebuild the
country, suspending habeas corpus so we can get
it back.
Guys, how are we falling for this?
Says the collapse is the real reform. The
sooner the system collapses, the better. Now look.
I'm the first person to argue
that government in general, I'm happy to see
go away entirely. The thing is, that's not
what's happening.
If you wanna see it I mean, how
didn't we just come through the argument of
the great reset and build back better?
Here's your republican version of build back better.
It's right there.
And he says the sooner the system collapse,
the better since we can't build a truly
free republic under the control of the current
swamp. That for sure is the case, and
it cannot be reformed while it exists. Now
even if you agree with all those things,
it's not this the argue that you need
to allow the government to do this seems
crazy to me. I'm not dispute disputing the
seemingly
set up to fail circumstance we're in.
But the your argument is to allow the
government to do this. That is Trump. That's
Elon. That's the point. I don't know why
see, the it's the same as always. Letting
the government solve the problem the government created
is never going to solve the government's
problem. And it says, the only draining is
the currency debt collapse that reboots the whole
system. It's coming. And guess what? When they
do that, guess what your currency will be?
CBDC,
digital currency. I guarantee it. And when it
arrives, it will be very sudden and large
and expected, like the nineteen ninety one collapse,
the USSR, prepare accordingly.
But I feel sorry for Elon. He certainly
tried, and he was doing the best he
could.
Oh, man. That's why Carrie Wedler and people
like her are such a breath of fresh
air for all of us out here that
want honesty objective and nonpartisan conversation.
And she says, waiting on Doge to look
into the Atlantic Council, a perfect representation of
deep state they're supposedly dismantling, which they'll never
do. When I say that I think this
does more harm than than good is it's
play
Yeah. Because if they're not looking deep into
the numbers, which is a lot of work,
they're not seeing that these aren't actually real
pets. And what they're assuming is that Elon
Musk is is hard at work cutting waste,
and
and liberals just hate it because I
they're challenging the deep state with it and
something something. But what I find interesting is
that someone like Elon Musk who, commissioned the
Twitter files.
The Twitter files published things on the Digital
Forensics Research Lab, which I know you guys
are familiar with, the Atlantic Council.
If we're talking about the deep state because
the whole branding here is Elon Musk is
going after the deep state, and that's why
people are so angry at him because he's
really fighting the power. Okay. The Atlanta Council's
board of directors is filled
with CIA or former CIA,
former military.
There's also funded by, like, the most powerful
financial people. So to my understanding of the
deep state, this is about as deep state
as you can get. It's this intersection
of powerful interest.
Yep.
And as she writes in the well, the
Free Thought Project wrote, we asked our recent
guest, Carrie Wetler, why she recently wrote Doge
does more harm than good and explains Elon's
cozy ties, the Atlantic Council and a story
notorious deep state think tank?
Exactly.
Breath of fresh air.
Now she also said this recently, which I
agree with, and this is that same point
back to what Clint and the rest were
saying. Like, so we're spending more now than
we were before. Now that see, what what
I keep saying from the beginning is the
outcome.
Stop listening to all the narrative and what
they want you to look at and what
they're shaking in front of you. Look at
what they said. Look at what they did.
What is the outcome? That's what matters to
me. Now, yes, you can factor in that
maybe they tried and failed and somebody else
stopped him. That matters. But if we constantly
are only looking for the like, if we're
only holding the government accountable for the outcome
and we act accordingly,
they can't play these games against you. And
so here, what we have is the actions,
the the the direction, the statement, the actions,
and the outcome. What's that? More spending.
Simple. And she says, it's truly an upside
down propagandized clown world when politicians who campaigned
on and people who voted for cutting spending
and limiting government demand more spending and bigger
government.
The big bill, which Rand Paul and Massey
will tell you is only gonna increase the
problem. But you see, the problem is that
people wanna go along with whatever the narrative
is, the team sport. And a lot of
them are already given the pass, the people
that caused this the most.
Now, yes, you can argue that they wouldn't
allow this or Republicans wouldn't do it. The
point is you don't if you were trying
to cut cost, you would not then be
building on massive stargate programs or, I mean,
funding Israel's genocide. That doesn't make sense if
you just are honest with yourself.
And same point, he says the richest man
tried and failed, just a thought, simply says,
oh, give him some credit. He built this.
Doe is building a master database to surveil
and track immigrants or anybody else under that
guise because she gets it.
And so here, ICE is paying Palantir
thirty million dollars because we're spend we're we're
cutting costs, right, guys, to build immigration OS
surveillance platform, which can be clearly used to
surveil anybody using biometrics and facial scans, which
is already being done. That is what's actually
happening.
That's why we're pulling our hair out. Why
couldn't we cut costs? Because they're literally building
out the great reset technocratic overtake of this
country. But let's look everywhere else and only
look at the, you know, the cat toys
that you know, dangly cat toy that Jones
is putting over here to get you looking
at something else entirely.
Or here's the other article, Palantir's immigration OS
fuels Trump's administration immigrant removal agenda.
Now we also talked about suspending habeas corpus.
I made a very deliberate point to use
mister Zionist Miller here in that whole, you
know, how do you do, fellow kids meme
because that's what he's doing. How do you
do, fellow Americans? These people are actively destroying
this country. In the most embarrassing, clumsy
I mean, almost meant to make Americans look
even stupider than half the world thinks we
are. It's insane.
Trump considers suspending habeas corpus. Now on that
very point before we get into the overlap
of immigration, let me also show you what
Christy Noem recently said just in case you
missed it because this is insane. Secretary
Noem, what is habeas corpus?
Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that
the president has to be able to remove
people from this country to suspend their right
to Let me let me stop you, ma'am.
Suspend their rights to Excuse me. That's that's
incorrect. President Reagan used it.
Excuse me. Mhmm. Habeas corpus is the legal
principle Mhmm. That requires that the government provide
a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people.
If not for that protection, the government could
simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold
them indefinitely for no reason. Now what you
know why you know for sure beyond the
fact that she said it wrong that she
doesn't know what she's talking about? She literally
said Lincoln used it. Lincoln did not use
habeas corpus, you absolute moron. Her argument is
that he suspended it, and that, at the
time, was literally unconstitutional until it later got
it ratified by congress. So her point that
the president can do any of it is
wrong. She also doesn't know what she's talking
about, and that's absolutely terrifying to me.
Now it's so certainly possible that she did
that in order to get it cemented in
people's minds, the the falsehood.
I wouldn't disagree with that possibility. Frankly, I
think she's chosen because of that ignorance, because
she is going along with whatever she was
told to do. That's what I think. And
I think this has to do with Zionism.
I think it has to do with
the collapse of this country in very obvious
ways.
Now on the immigration point and how it
overlaps, rather, not I I shouldn't say, not
the immigration point, but so but the,
overlap of that with the Israeli discussion. I
forgot. I I pulled off the immigration conversation
for the next show. But another point to
point out, the the highlight this that is
more of a distraction con concept,
you saw this going around.
That's funny as I almost talked about this
the other day because I saw them, you
know, breaking story that Biden was naming people
pushing back on the vaccine domestic terrorists. Is
that even information that we didn't I mean,
as far as I'm concerned, that was a
very public conversation.
It's very odd to me how were they
especially this person and the rest of repackaging
basic information to people to get it's just
very strange to me. But he says, the
Biden administration secretly listed millions of Americans as
violent domestic terrorists. Well, guess what? That's been
going on for a long time. You could
look at the conversation of the,
I'm now blanking on the, continuity of government
conversation.
This has been going on for a very
long time. Constitutionalists have been on these lists
for a long time. People that believe too
much in the constitution. This is we've talked
about this forever. Now and then in particular,
just during Biden's last administration or more importantly
from Trump's
into Biden's, that's what was going on.
The argument of the even the COVID nineteen
side of it under Trump's administration, there was
already the conversation of the radicalization. I mean,
it's all been building. And it's whether it's
hate speech, we'll get into in a minute,
or if these conversations, it's always about making
it one side of the conversation. But the
point is massive story, he says.
But I said, nope. Old news. Here's the
article Whitney wrote for TLAB back in 2020,
2021,
right in the beginning of the administration, which
was who is a terrorist in Biden's administration,
Biden's America. Read it for yourself. It talks
about the vaccine conversation. It talks about claiming
people are domestic extremists because of that conversation.
So if we wrote about it back then,
it's not really a breaking massive story then,
is it? But the problem is it's about
distracting you into something else.
My point is, nope, old news, but great
for distracting from how Trump's administration
is currently doing the exact same thing for
Israel right now.
Using hate speech or whatever else,
you're turning us into domestic terrorists because we
speak out about a foreign government or because
we use language you don't agree with. But
that's the acceptable version of it today. It's
always the same thing. Half the paradigm is
always part of it, and people like this
tow it along every single time.
You can read it for yourself. It's a
great article. Important to understand.
And a lot a lot of sent you
know, kind of like ahead of the curve
information, by the way. So I'll share it
out real quick.
So on that note,
here is a point just just set a
tone about language, I think, is interesting. This
is recent. Simon Godek points this out in
twenty first. Europe is now jailing people for
words.
Five fans have just been sentenced to prison
for insulting a millionaire footballer, which is insane.
It's it's lunacy.
One, that's your you could say what you
want out loud, not in some place in
the country right now, but here's what's crazy,
is that at least for a while, weirdly
not right now, the Elon Musk and Jones
and Twitterverse and all the Republicans were couldn't
stop screening about how Europe was collapsing because
of this kind of thing, woke ideology, which
I part I agree with, but that's half
the story.
The point
is this is crazy and it's obviously a
violation, especially from an American perspective, but in
general,
but that's exactly what's happening right now in
this country. That's now, I think, why they're
suddenly so quiet about it because you cannot
hide the argument
that this is because if you're gonna argue
this is a problem, guess what? They're doing
that to Americans because of hate speech right
now. Yes. Antisemitism is one version of that
that they're using. It's the same as before.
Don't forget that right back then, they called
you guys
Nazis because of your antisemitism because of the
red hat. Now suddenly, you're the ones pointing
and calling other people antisemites.
It doesn't make sense. The point is this
is a problem on where it's happening, and
it's happening all over the place, and it's
not partisan. It's not left. It's all of
it. They're trying to
use information, words to suppress the flow,
keep you or potentially put you in jail
for saying things they don't like.
So here is the overlap in this country
where Thomas Massie is calling out the GOP
led antisemitism bill.
Another one that opened the idea that you
can be arrested, sentenced because of speech.
It's just it's so transparent what's happening, and
there are people like that are not calling
this out. Not really.
Here's an example of this. This is Adam
said this is not a joke. Zionist doxers
ordered the US government to silence an Israeli
critic
or an Israel critic, and Pam Bondi and
Leo Terrell
actually responded. We shouldn't need to this shouldn't
be shocking, by the way,
seeing as
how this has already happened
that in a court document
oh, it's the wrong one. In a court
document,
it's the same article,
they revealed that a visa was stripped from
a guy
based on a tweet alone from Qatar. Canary
Mission and Qatar, they sent it to them.
They had arrested for forty eight hours, pulled
his visa until he was able to prove
it was a lie.
That's where we are. This government and people
like Miller are absolutely allowing that.
I thought that was the one.
Let me see if this is it.
Well, guess not. Anyway, it's in the art.
It's in the show. You can check it
out for yourself.
So the point is,
not only they're already responding to whatever the
Zionist group says to go after, Americans included,
now you have this kid that you've seen.
He does good work talking about what he
sees, breaking down lies of Zionism.
And stop antisemitism says meet Guy Christiansen, a
TikTok influencer with millions of followers who has
built his platform by glorifying terrorism? Hardly. Spreading
antisemitic propaganda? Nope. And most recently celebrating the
murder of Jews, not even remotely. I mean,
how how sad and embarrassing and pathetic that
that's the best they can do. You know
why they're going after him? Because he's influential
and because he does a pretty good job
of breaking it down based on the facts,
giving you material to look at. And he's
pretty benign if you listen to him. He's
not even he's not extremist. He's not he's
not, you know, intifada or whatever, which I
don't even think is an extremist in the
based on the world we're dealing with right
now where people are simply calling for resistance.
The point is, he's bay you watch him.
He's very
even in the context of every you get
what I'm saying. Like, he's not even pushing
the envelope. He's basically just saying they're committing
genocide. Here you can prove it. Here's a
video. And they went after him like crazy.
Leo Terrell from the DOJ goes, we'll review
all leads.
They're literally responding to these accounts who are
driving their censorship of Americans and anybody else.
Pam Bonney says, thanks, Leo.
So your US government and don't be for
a second, think I'm only talking about the
current right. It's it's your government, but, yes,
in particular right now, the Trump administration,
are responding
to people that are speech who are saying
things. Why? Because they've set this up to
go after you criminally because of your words,
and that's not supposed to be happening in
this country. Now he does say doxing. I
don't think this was doxing necessarily. It's just
saying whose name was. But it says, yet,
instead of condemning, they're fueling a free speech
crackdown.
All while the Epstein case gathers dust. Where
are you at, conservatives? I know most of
you are starting to call it out. Step
up. Find the courage. Realize you're being played.
Now, here is a great clip from,
James Lee.
As he says, America is occupied.
I'm just so glad that people are finally
finding the courage to he's been doing it
for a long time, by the way, but
others
to talk about this.
It's not about racism, guys. It's very clear
about a government controlling government policy. And that's
why it's so important for them to hide
this, both your government and the US government.
Check it out, guys. It's very real. People
are just finally starting to see it.
You wanna know why America's cooked? It's not
China. It's not Russia.
It's this.
It's your First Floor. Yeah. And you're walking
with the congresswoman.
Yes. Oh my gosh. Please.
Well, thank you so much for your, community
service. Yeah.
Yeah. I was wondering,
with, all the support of Republicans
and people who are anti choice and people
who are working to disrupt our election systems
that APAC is doing right now, I'm wondering
why you're exceptional support. I'm a you and
I'm my family lives here in this community.
Yeah. And I really think that those kinds
of candidates are making the dream people less
safe. I'm wondering why you're accepting there. Well,
thank you so much for coming and bringing
your kiddo. It's so nice to meet with
you. It's nice to meet you too. I'm
just wondering I wanna make life and this
country safe, like, for him to grow up
in. I'm wondering why you would wanna accept
their endorsement and I I $800,000
in in ads this year. Yeah. I I
guys, I have, receipt. How is that? How
many endorsements have I received
selection? A lot. I think I've got a
lot of local labor in this business. Yeah.
Yeah. You are a great representative, and we
really appreciate your support. I'm just hoping Yay.
You guys.
Oh my god. Yeah.
Such this is not look at a boat.
That's right. Look at the boat. Oh, I
have so many endorsements everywhere.
Bye. Yeah. A congresswoman
who purports to care about Jewish safety, but
won't answer any questions from her own constituents
voicing concerns
about their safety. That was representative Haley Stevens,
democrat from Michigan's Eleventh District. And this may
sound like a crazy conspiracy theory, but she
was placed
in that seat specifically to represent Israel.
I completely agree. And you'll remember the person
she replaced. We already talked about this, and
even MSNBC covered this. But think about what
you just saw.
All all happy, but the moment that comes
up, almost like couldn't couldn't get away fast
enough.
That shows you that clearly that is more
important. And maybe you could argue it's not
Israel. It's just the money. Right? Fair enough.
You can clear that. But whatever it is,
it's more important than the people she's supposed
to represent. So even if you just think
it's money, that means money controls this country
and not you.
Now we all know it's more than just
money at this point, but, I mean, hopefully,
we do. Either way, that means that we
don't have what we think we do. It's
just time to be very honest about this,
then recognize where that money's coming from, and
then you can really see how the strengths
are being pulled.
That's right. Back in 02/2022,
the pro Israel lobby donated $3,000,000
to her campaign in a safe Democrat district
because they wanted to oust the incumbent,
Andy Levin, an actual Jewish representative,
because they deemed him not pro Israel enough.
Which shows you as always it's about Zionism
and nothing else. Quote, AIPAC has targeted Levin
for defeat because while he comes from a
well known Jewish political family and has voiced
support for Israel's existence,
he has also been sharply critical of that
nation's policy towards Palestinians living in Israeli controlled
territories.
I'm really Jewish.
But,
AIPAC,
can't stand the idea
that I am the clearest, strongest Jewish voice
in Congress
standing for a simple proposition
that there's no way to have a secure
democratic homeland for the Jewish people
unless we achieve the political and human rights
of the Palestinian people.
That is all it takes, folks. The mildest
form of criticism,
and you're out. To serve in the United
States Congress, you must pledge a % allegiance
to Israel. Hence, why Haley Stevens, who supposedly
cares a lot about Jewish lives, can act
with such disdain towards her own Jewish constituents.
Once again, to put it bluntly, she is
not there to serve the people of Michigan.
She's there to serve Israel. And if APEC
and the rest of the pro Israel lobbying
apparatus
even catches wind of a slight waiver in
your support of Israel, you better watch out.
Here are the top 20 recipients in congress,
the house and the senate, of APEC money
in the twenty twenty two midterm cycle according
to Open Secrets. They're members of both parties.
They come from every corner of the country
with varying levels of experience in congress. The
democrat Glenn Ivey of Maryland tops the list.
He beat out fellow democrat Donna Edwards in
Maryland's house primary
after AIPAC poured millions
into pro Ivy advertisements and mailers.
Edwards was running for a second stint in
congress after serving during the Obama administration
where she voted present,
not even a no, on a number of
pro Israel resolutions.
So the money poured in against her. And
next on the list is Thomas Massie of
Kentucky
to punish him for exposing that every Republican
member of Congress has a quote, APAC handler.
The last thing I'll say because I wanna
leave it on a positive note, a note
of action is to say that for people
who maybe don't care to pay attention to
politics because it's so depressing, it's a cesspool,
I have a tip, a heuristic,
and that is the easiest way to decide
who to vote for is whichever candidate has
raised the least amount of money because that
means they are more beholden to the people
who vote for them and not for the
people who fund them.
My name is James Lee. This is the
fifty one forty nine show. Thank you so
much for watching. Please subscribe for more.
If we're but me has an APAC person.
Like that mean, an APAC person? It's like
your babysitter. Your APAC Babysitter. Why have I
never heard this before? Why would they wanna
tell their constituents that they've basically got a
buddy system with somebody who's representing a foreign
country? It doesn't benefit the congressman for people
to know that, so they're not gonna tell
you that.
Why have I never heard this before? What's
going on? I can't believe it.
It's basic and and transparent, and it's been
talked about for a very long time. But
sure. Gosh. Gee golly. I didn't see that
until just now.
Be careful.
There's a lot of people out there trying
to manipulate.
Great work here. I think it's important to
see this. And, obviously, guys, this goes back
a long way. Now here's another point from
WikiLeaks sharing you that my we just talked
about Microsoft canceling the email of
the the, the,
director, is it director? The Khan from the
ICJ
or ICC in regard to the investigation. I
mean, it's just wild how transparent that is.
They just they canceled his bank. His his
Microsoft pulled his email.
I mean, how do we not that's just
weaponization
from Israel. It's
transparent. Now it's just Microsoft is facing internal
backlash over its provision of cloud services and
AI tools to the Israeli military. The Azure
conversation, which is just massively utilized by the
Israeli government, and in fact, I think that's
extension of it through Microsoft, which is I
think their main location is now in Israel.
It says the company is now reportedly blocking
employee emails containing terms like Palestine, Gaza, Genocide.
See my point, guys? This is
Palestine,
Gaza. So now you Microsoft is just blocking
emails,
which how long have I been telling you
this? Like, my emails don't even work anymore.
That's why I recently put the new phone
line in because I I mean, it's just
I don't even wanna get into I wasn't
gonna bring it up, but my my my
the stuff that's going on with my electronics,
I was gonna show you guys in the
beginning today what I've been doing in my
garden and, like, our our our area. I've
got we got a whole bunch of stuff
growing. I just wanna kind of inspire some
people to get out there and do the
same. I sent I took these this morning
and tried to send them to myself four
different ways, and I just would not I
just couldn't get it. My phone just wouldn't
send it. It wouldn't load. And it's like,
that's just one of a hundred thousand things
we're dealing with. My point is, guys, this
is where we are. We talked about the
trucker convoys,
right, getting their getting depersoned.
I mean, it's right in front of us,
and it's happening every day. And all of
the strings tie back to exactly what we're
talking about.
Azure. The block was revealed that no Azure
for apartheid, which is the group's name,
of pro Palestinian Microsoft workers who say that
they they revealed this, who say the company
quietly activated the filter on its Exchange server
shortly after a protest at Microsoft in 2025.
Man. And I simply said, now Microsoft is
supporting the current US government directive, left and
right, by the way, of censoring and possibly
deporting those who speak out about Israel's genocide.
What about censoring American free speech on behalf
of a foreign government as America First? I'd
love an answer.
And then, of course, before we finish with
Israel,
this is from the twenty first.
Trump Netanyahu says, Trump told me I have
absolute commitment to you.
US deepening ties with Arab states can expand
Abraham Accords,
to which there was zero pushback. So,
again,
didn't didn't Jones and the rest just tell
us that we knew for sure that he
was gonna split with Netanyahu? I told you
I was gonna be right. Well, maybe it'll
happen in the future. And I
many people have argued that would eventually potentially
happen. But this idea that if you just
project any possibility every other day that eventually
something happened, then but then you can't even
be the point is, guys, whether it's Ukraine
or Israel, they are immersed.
And these people that are out there constantly
trying to trip you up, make you think
that it's not that. Every day with a
different liar to say, even if they don't
even happen.
What we just told they were gonna split,
and now they're not dependent on USAID. Well,
that was a narrative that was very easily
floated, and I hope that happens. Even if
it's just Netanyahu because that shows you were
going in the right direction.
As of right now, I don't see that
at at all. I see more work, more
alignment,
more censorship,
more action on behalf of the foreign government.
And so to understand what that government is,
just in case you haven't been paying attention,
let's finish with what Israel is actually doing.
Now this is important to see seeing as
how this overlaps first with the conversation of
the embassy staff that was shot.
Netanyahu on the twenty second talks about how
last night something terrible happened in Washington, which
is horrible.
Whatever you know, just because someone's Israeli does
not therefore mean they are what every you
know, what you could point at about people
in the government, the IDF, people that are
screaming about rape and genocide, murder. There's plenty
of people in Israel who are calling that
stuff out.
However, though, you can show that one of
the people involved, the guy, was actively saying
that hospitals were open
open targets and that we shouldn't be stopping
from hurting people. So I'll go into that
in a second. Nonetheless,
it's still sad that people get killed and
hurt human life matters. Point is that here
is what voice of rabbis had to say
about Netanyahu trying to claim this for himself.
He said the murder of Yohan and Sarah
was terror was horrific and must be condemned.
But free Palestine
is not Heil Hitler, which I'll play for
you in a second. He actually said that.
And saying so is dangerous incitement.
Voice of Rabbi's, an Orthodox Jewish organization says
Israel is not the Jewish state. Netanyahu is
not a Jewish leader. He does not speak
for the Jewish people or the Torah. Stop
using our pain to justify what you're doing.
Another clip. This is a little breakdown from
James Lee about this discussion.
I think he does a good job being
objective about this and kind of making a
point you don't expect at the end, and
I agree. I think it's we should do
our best to avoid in any way trying
to fall into assumptive directions.
Either way, though, he does present this, and
I do think it's worth considering that this
very well could have been a false flag.
Always. There there I've said this no matter
what the conversation.
If you're afraid to say that's a possibility,
then you are already trapped.
I'm not saying I mean, I'll go over
it again. I think there's very clear signals
around this, but I can't even decide I
don't think it's definitive.
But always a possibility. No matter how sensitive,
no matter how danger you know, like, what
I mean, remember in the beginning, and this
is not even the right example since I
don't think a false flag, even though kind
of it does fit, the conversation of the
rape that happened in regard to Israel and
Gaza.
They have now proven even the woman they
claim with the gray pants has now stated
out loud that she wasn't raped.
Despite that still being some notice how you
don't see the gray pants with the stain
anymore, like but it's still out there. But
they lied about that. They forced it in.
And what was my point? Damn you for
making me have to stand up and question
such a terrible thing. But that's our job.
It is my job is to do that
no matter what. What no matter how uncomfortable,
the truth is what matters to me, and
we were on the right side of that.
And so the same thing here is that
we should never shy away from wondering whether
this is something that was made to happen
or faked. I don't think that's what happened.
But just realize that it's amazing that we've
been pushed away from being able to even
consider those things regardless of how prevalent they
are throughout history. I mean, prevalent if you
understand the reality. But check out check this
breakdown, and then we'll go into this story.
I have to say this, but these two
people did not deserve to die. I read
that he had just proposed to her or
is about to propose to her. Either way,
I do not condone what happened to them.
But what I will say is that this
tragedy
was
very convenient
to the country for which they served. Because
just yesterday,
said country fired warning shots at foreign diplomats
who were visiting. A delegation representing 31 countries
including Italy, Canada, Egypt, and The UK had
to run for cover. Not a great situation.
Their official story is that they had fired
warning shots at this group of diplomats and
journalists because their tour had veered into an
unauthorized
area. Ryan Grim commented that even if every
word of that story is true, it is
still a deranged unhinged thing to do to
which I say I completely agree. Anyway, day
later, this other horrible thing happens. And I'm
not saying that this isn't a coincidence, but
the end result is that today, the media
cycle has completely shifted. Okay? The same search
terms are now conveniently yielding
very different results. Funny how that works. Anyway,
the last thing I'll say about this is
that I think it's just a really bad
sign for this country that
a heinous
act of violence like that happens,
and a not so insignificant
percentage of the population
thinks either, a,
they had it coming, or, b, that it
was some kind of false flag operation
perpetrated by the victims themselves.
Not an ideal situation. Let's just put it
that way.
Now if you know his work, you know
as well as I that he had no
way is suggesting that that's not something you
should consider or that it might it's not
possible. Right? If I'm willing to bet if
you actually get the way he presented that,
it seems like he does think it's certainly
one of the possibilities. But I like the
way he ended it. The point is that
that's sad that we're in this binary broken
partisan game where basically your only two driven
choices are that it's absolutely made up and
fake or that these people got what they
deserve. That's wild. And it just shows you
that they are everything we're dealing with is
to divide you into two camps so those
camps can be painted against each other, usually
with neither of them having the full picture.
It's every single day in every possible way.
And at one point or another, we all
seem to be able to acknowledge that except
when we're immersed in it. So I think
he did a good job there. The point
is there's a lot of reason to think
that there's some weirdness around this. Not least
of which is that they fake things just
like this many times in the past. I
just went over this in the last show.
That's not that shouldn't even be contentious. There's
the Guardian is written about faking, you know,
Jewish people faking,
anti Semitic attacks
or anti Semitic graffiti
or actually attacking people and claiming I mean,
this is this happened
in Israel since October 7 more than once.
You know, it's it's just frustrating that we
always have to qualify these things even though
it's one of the easiest parts to prove.
Not to say the same is assuming that's
what happened here. Right?
That's what always frustrates them about that is
that we are being objective about this. I'll
include James Lee's interview with me from a
while ago. I should connect with him again.
Now here's what Caitlin had to say, and
this is the first part we saw. As
Glenn Greenwald said, the ADL is already exploiting
this, like, immediately exploiting this, the murder of
two Israeli embassy staffers to demand more limits
on free speech,
specifically demanding Israel critics with, with the large
platforms
be banned for speaking about Israel.
This is right in front of you. And
Caitlin Johnstone said, Zionism is the single greatest
threat to free speech in our society today.
The West's support for Israel is causing a
nonstop aggressive assault on our civil rights throughout
the entire Western world. And the scary part
is that it teeter totters back and forth.
So the day they were driving the Democrats
to push for a different way, and now
all of a sudden, the Republicans are doing
the same thing. And how we don't allow
that to see us, what's really driving this,
I don't know. She goes, this is personal.
Israel directly threatens us all.
I agree.
And that's not the same as saying every
Israeli, by the way. That's important. Now here's
another clip. ADL's David Goldenberg calls for mass
censorship,
deplatforming,
and repealing section two thirty of after two
Israeli embassy aids were shot in DC.
Quote, these tech platforms are not guaranteed under
the constitution. They're just not. Gee, I wonder
where that thread's been coming from the entire
time.
Driving us into this position, which is only
gonna create more suppression, more control. And don't
forget, guys, of all the platforms, the ADL
literally works with Twitter right now on the
surface, like, more than before. The Yaccarino, ADL
overlap, the partnership they told you about right
in the beginning is obvious and is prominent.
Here's what he said. I I would say,
look, I can speak specifically from an ADL
perspective.
ADL Center for Technology and Society has done
significant studies in the responsiveness
of tech platforms, and we've actually graded them
on the responsiveness of anti semitism,
holocaust,
holocaust denial,
other forms of hate. Again, all of which
are speech and you can say what you
want. This work world in which they've created
a dynamic. Like, let me ask you this.
If you came out online right now and
you started talking about
I mean, just pick any serious event. Anything.
Like, how about Rwanda? If you came out
and said, I don't think Rwanda actually happened.
Would you be attacked the same way?
Which I I would also come I'd be
like, you know, look. The point is you
have a right to
express your discontent and say, you're ridiculous, man.
Here's all the information. Here's, you know, here's
Norman Finkelstein. He will tell you you're wrong
in in regard to the holocaust. Even you
know? And the point is he will nonetheless
avidly fight for your right to deny that
it happened because he believes in free speech
that much, but will stand there and tell
you you're wrong. And they will always misrepresent
him as somehow being a holocaust denier despite
how clearly he lays that out. The point
is simply it's speech, and this is the
same kind of point as before.
There there's these carve outs where that's somehow
off the table. It's just more speech. If
you you're allowed to say and think and
express your thoughts around these things any way
you want. It only became a sub problem
when people started weaponizing these things, and there's
an endless amount of Jewish people out there
that will tell you how Israel's weaponized that
exact conversation.
I mean, it it's nonstop.
And even me just expressing that regardless of
whether you know, the idea that I will
happily call someone out for being racist, but
I don't remember these conversations, but yet I'll
still be called a racist
because I say people can say what they
want. And that shows you the crux of
the problem.
They just need to control your speech. You
know, you have a platform like Meta that
just gutted its entire,
fact checking department, and they're moving away from
it. And so what we need to do
is we need to apply pressure in a
real significant way on tech platforms that they
have a responsibility,
that they have a absolute
responsibility
to,
check
and remove hateful speech that is Wow. Insightful.
Not And as always, who gets to decide
what is hateful? You know, it's really interesting
as much as I'm really adverse to where,
Jordan Peterson has ended up in all of
this because some whatever happened with all that,
He I mean, I'll play this. I'll see
if I still have the clip.
Well, he makes a very logical claim that
if you allow that to happen, well, what's
gonna happen is the work the the people
you would least want to control that outcome
will be the ones that gravitate towards controlling
it,
which is where we are. And we all
know that except that everyone runs through this
conversation. Uninsightful with an s, but insightful with
a c.
Right? And so we need to do that.
Congress, there's a role for federal legislate for
federal regulators to play, and there's also a
role that states can even play too. And
we've seen that in places like California and
others.
You hold them accountable. Like, right now, tech
platforms are not accountable for having misinformation.
Was it share I mean, can you even
think about how think about what he's saying
right there. So your argument is that people
so what's misinformation? You can't be wrong.
You spread misinformation every day, so is the
government. So that's allowable of misinformation because they,
well, they're gonna decide that you didn't mean
to or that you meant to. It's malinformation.
It's wildly subjective.
And, I mean, at the at the textbook
example
is a violation of free speech because you
can lie under free speech, right? You have
the right to lie and be wrong, and
that's free speech. You can say whatever you
want. They're trying to create a circumstance that
sounds logical
to shut that down. That's been going on
for a long time, not even new in
any sense. But it's ramping up right now
because of this conversation.
And it's, you could argue,
manufactured for that, used for that, outcomes the
same.
Section two thirty of the communications,
National Communications Act or federal the the Federal
Communications Act. Congress needs to amend section two
thirty, which provides immunity to tech platforms right
now for what happens. Right? If you list
If you do, all you're gonna do with
that is create more censorship, which is exactly
what they want. They'll they'll get rid of
literally anything that even flirts with that line
because they don't wanna be held accountable for
it. The reason that was there is because
the reality of free speech, and they're actively
chipping that away. Good good way to pause
that. These people are you can see it
in their eyes. I'm not talking about anybody
that's
extreme whether, you know or Zionist in this
case, but anything else. Extremists.
Whatever the religion, whatever the flavor, whatever the
government mind mindset,
I see a similar thing in them. Into
what Mark Zuckerberg said, for example, when he
testified before congress. He was like, listen. If
you call twenty years ago or thirty years
ago, if you called,
somebody to give them a to issue a
bomb threat, you didn't sue the bells.
They were just the platform through which the
conduit through which or the platform through which,
you know, the person made the threat. I'm
not responsible for the threat. Right? These tech
platforms are not guaranteed under the constitution.
I just had an epiphany
real quick.
So think about this.
Stupid streamyard settings.
What have we been seeing from Elon Musk?
He's been really driving this idea that Twitter
is the news. And I've always been so
confounded by, like, that's just the dumbest argument.
It's there's all sorts of stuff that's not
news on the platform.
It's simply a medium. Yes. There is news
posted on it, but it's just it's like
calling your television set the news. It's not.
It's a medium through which news can travel,
like he just said. So what's interesting is
by using our Elon's argument, you're setting they're
they're setting themselves up to be able to
be shut down for that reason, which then
forces them to comply with more censorship.
Sounds like a manufactured excuse to me.
Worth considering.
They're just not. They're private companies under the
constitution.
They're just not. They're private companies.
They can use their user agreements to kick
people off to deplatform.
They did. And then we've seen in the
last few years when Elon Musk bought x,
right, the deplatforming of people. You saw,
Facebook and Meta that changed their policies. Right?
The deplatforming of the replatforming, excuse me, of
people. Right? So congress could amend that act
and actually hold tech platforms accountable. And I
guarantee you look what's happening right now on
college campuses.
Universities are being held accountable for the anti
sem Oh god. You're right. Of course. That's
where he goes to that. Or or people
are being wet the it's weaponized against people
for not suppressing speech.
Just transparent. Now I really think there's something
to that. If you really think about that
for a second, the idea of what he's
really saying is that, well, they, you know,
they they if you create the circumstance that
Elon is that they are the news, then
they they are then held to that standard.
And that means they have to then critique
or censor or fact check what you're putting
out. It's very simple to think about now.
I knew I've always felt there was something
there. So ADL's goal David Goldenberg calls for
mass censorship deplatforming and repealing the section two
thirty.
So here, it was just that quick clip
showing you him actually saying that because I
I just find this to be insane. Like,
this is the thing about this.
You could argue that you feel that some
people say that and mean something bad, but
but to just say free Palestine
equates
to Heil Hitler, it's just it's cartoonish. And
that's why I think they've gotten it's my
it's my point about Israeli propaganda.
You could have packaged this a hundred better
ways that made it feel a little bit
more logical. But, no, they just go straight
to the they they make it silly. I
don't know whether there's a design net or
not, but here's what he actually said. Free
Palestine
is just today's version
of Heil Hitler.
He actually said that. I mean, that's so
stupid. So you're telling me that so, like,
I mean, people out there are saying free
Palestine, so literally nobody anywhere in the world
means we want a state to be free.
They all just mean we love Nazis, which
is just so stupid. It doesn't make any
sense other than it gives people who already
know they're lying a talking point.
And that's how this works. And this is
what your governments out there support,
blindly.
So here,
continuing,
is one of the people and this is
Yaron was one of the people that were
shot.
There's many examples of this. If you look
up to what he's putting out there, he
was a remember oh, and there the other
point we're gonna get to is remember, he
was a Christian Zionist. He was not a
Jewish person. And so what's crazy is that
all of them all of them, I mean,
j JD Vance, they all rushed out to
be like, two Jews were shot and then
had to edit their tweets, which shows you
that they had a direction. They had a
mandate. They had a people were going, this
is the agenda here.
And or at least they know the talking
points. They know what they're supposed to do,
and so they reacted. Until then, it came
out that it weren't, and they tried to
hide it.
So it just it shows you they're not
interested in facts here, guys. They know their
marching orders.
So first, he is a Christian Zionist, and
he says, and this is confirming what we
knew all along. Hamas embeds itself and Gaza
civilians. No. Not we haven't seen any examples
of that. In fact, they've forced to be
they've been proven
to have been keeping them safe in about
14 different ways. On top of that, we
know that Israel's been caught using human shields
45 times over. We'll talk about that today
yet again
Or wherever that was. Oh, yeah. No. Where
was that? Hold on. Sorry. I'm jumping ahead.
Here's the article. A a new Associated Press
article. A new one. Israeli soldiers and former
detainees tell AP of Israel's use of human
shields.
It just never stops.
And there was a point about,
which one was it? There I'm trying to
remember if I wanna pull something forward. Anyway,
so this first part is just simply showing
you that he says even hospitals are not
off limits.
Yeah. You mean something that is provably a
war crime? Well, yes. Thank you for making
our point.
Slain Israeli diplomats in DC remembered as voices
for peace.
That's why they're framing it.
Even though he's calling for the bombing of
hospitals. So that's a little bit contradictory to
me. Just being objective. You you take it
personal if you want. These are just facts.
Just like the other conversation we talked about.
Now here's Dan Cohen highlighting what JD Vance
did.
My heart breaks for the two Jews who
were murdered last night. That's what he wrote.
Anti Semitic violence has no place. Well, he
said free Palestine. What does that have to
do with Jews? He's talking about a state
fighting other state, but they need to make
it about that. Now, of course, it could,
but how do you know that, j j
d Vance? You don't. You didn't know what
is his mind. You're going along with what
you know you're supposed to do. That's what
these people do. And he and he repo
he reposted it, changed it. He says, JD
Vance edited his post assuming that they were
both Jewish and then realized he was a
Christian Zionist, but still called the killings antisemitic.
Right? He goes, the real antisemitism is assuming
that everyone who works for Israel is a
Jew. That's exactly what Israel creates, which creates
this antisemitism that they need to rationalize their
existence, which is why Jewish people like Dan
Cohen are calling out their lie. And he
goes, stop trying to twist definitions to fit
Zionist political dictates.
Exactly. And
this is the kind of thing we're seeing
also showing you a talking point, a line
which overlaps with the Trump and immigration
and the lunatics like Laura Loomer out there,
which this person says, this is why. So
remember, we're talking about a as Dan writes,
a the deranged Washington DC Israeli embassy staff
shooter gave a gift to Zionist lobby.
So we're gonna get into a second the
very, very striking evidence that suggest this was
planned.
Regardless, the the narrative is a Hispanic American
citizen
who
a lefty apparently,
said free Palestine and was going after for
that reason. Okay. So the point is that
guy, he's arguing, was a deranged
person who shot people so clearly, and he
literally handed a gift to the Zionist lobby.
I agree. Shifting the international spotlight away from
the fact that they just shot openly at
a bunch of diplomats,
that literally changed the entire conversation or any
number of other things. So the point is
simply,
it's a like we just said, a a
a Hispanic American citizen. That's the story. This
guy says, this is why low IQ foreigners
don't belong in this nation. That's what his
response was. They are serious detriment to us
all. Not only is that just disgusting thing
to say in any context, the idea is
you're so you're do you not know the
story or is it a bot? Is this
I I I don't know. But this is
everywhere. And here's you could prove to you
it's not just the bots.
Here's Laura Loomer.
She goes, he was wearing a kifa and
shouted, the only solution is intifada. As far
as I can tell, literally didn't happen. Free
Palestine is what we saw. But, of course,
she's not about the facts. She's about trying
to force in a political narrative for her
gross agenda. And it says, and that he
assassinated two Jews. Nope. One was a Christian.
Doesn't doesn't matter, though. See, even when you
get proven to be wrong, it doesn't matter.
Well, one was a Christian. Doesn't change the
fact. No. It does, though, because facts matter,
Laura. They do. And he goes, we need
to rid our country of the foreign finance
Palestinian influence by the Muslim brotherhood to protect
Americans from the mental illness known as the
Palestinian movement. My god.
These people were terrorists.
And he responded
goes, well, the murderer was apparently Latino, so
you're dumb.
And
she says that, and he responds by saying,
hey, Laura. Let's sum it up. Israel is
slaughtering tens of thousands of children, which you
never condemn. Wonder why. Wink, wink.
A woke leftist Latino gets radicalized and kills
two Israelis.
None of them Christian. Or excuse me. One
of them Christian is what he said. Your
response? Ban Muslim immigration.
Make it make sense.
It's just so it's so crazy.
Where I I I get it. I I
I shutter to think that there are that
many people that are stupid enough to fall
for that in this country. That terrifies me.
I'd like to believe it's in my interest
to believe that's not the case.
Here's what Adam points out.
So you're telling me two Israeli diplomats got
killed
across the street from an FBI field office,
which is the case, outside a Jewish museum
that had been closed for four hours
that day.
And one day after, Israel fired at European
diplomats. And Europe was taking talking about sanctions,
and you don't think it's a false flag,
which I wouldn't assume, but those are interesting
points to bring up on top of the
fact that what we talked about yesterday, which
was that he apparently
was very conspicuous,
did all of this, and then walked back
into the museum is which is in this
where they arrested him to where they brought
him back out briefly to where he said,
free, free Palestine, and then they sat him
down.
Because that all perfectly makes sense. Right? Now
that doesn't prove
everything you want it to mean, but you
have to admit that doesn't make sense. So
the like we've talked about with other stories,
people tend to make anomalies
mean what they want them to mean.
It could mean that, but it is an
anomaly that doesn't line up. To me, that
shows there's very clearly something else going on.
I don't know. You can decide, but consider
how obvious that is.
Here, as Khaleesi points out, Elias Rodriguez was
his name, the alleged shooter at the Israeli
embassy in Washington DC after being arrested.
Remember, as he walked back inside the Jewish
Museum after shooting people outside, then he gets
arrested, then he walk him back out to
yell that, then they sit him down on
the stairs, and then leave him there alone.
Does that make sense?
Well, I left him with his legs crossed
to sit and chill alone.
That does seem strange, but you can decide
for yourself.
Now all of it together,
I think that what stands out the most
is simply that this is a timing of
it that you can see as well as
the if you look at the search results
that you see the graphic going around, which
is very easy to look up,
Israeli shoots dip shoots at diplomats.
It was all about that happening. The next
day, less than twenty four hours later,
it breaks down as that you would search
the same terms, and now it shows you
only about the Israeli embassy people being shot.
Now why would that come up with Israeli
shoots at diplomats? Because that's how the search
engine works. It is a simply,
whether or not this was organic, that was
part of the cover up. That's how this
tends to work. Microsoft, Google, it's all Grock,
it's all part of the same thing.
Then you again, the idea that this happened,
the timing of it, the the, the association,
the walking back in afterward. I mean, the
the idea that you're right across from the
FBI office that this was closed for four
hours, then why was why was he I
mean, none of it adds up. Again, doesn't
have to prove that. But it's just like
with the shooting for Trump. Everyone pretends like
what they said made sense. They move forward,
and now half of them are allowing them
to say there was one shooter. It's just
blind, guys.
Now here is another example on top of
everything else we showed you before of the
fact that mean, we showed you a lot
of the different examples of, like, faking anti
Semitic crimes. This is we've showed you this
clip before. This is a former m I
six talking about how the how Mossad faked
things just like this.
But the two cases that really got us.
First of all, there was a a false
flag attack
in London
in 1994
where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli
embassy in the center of London. Now I
remember this vaguely. This is we're talking fourteen
years ago. It's a long time ago. But
it was huge at the time. I mean,
it was a huge worldwide story. Yeah. Yeah.
In fact, there'd been, an earlier attack against
some Jewish interest section in Buenos Aires earlier
that year as well. Similar sort of MO,
with a car bomb driven and parked outside
that exploded. Very minor injuries. That was all.
Nobody was killed.
And, it was a very sophisticated device. It
appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics.
Now this is very, very rare. Even the
IRA, which is a very sophisticated terrorist organization,
could not make bombs that, effective.
So it looked like it, you know, sort
of fairly technical person had put that together.
But what emerged from that,
the senior MI five officer who was in
charge of the investigation into it, and had
seen all the evidence but also all the
intelligence which isn't necessarily admissible in court, wrote
his formal assessment at the end of the
case and he said he reckoned that Mossad,
the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their
own embassy. It's sort of controlled
explosion outside the embassy.
And as I said, that was a senior
MI five officer. That was his formal verdict.
If you read that on the Internet now,
you would say that sounds like some mad
conspiracy theory.
But it wasn't. This was the official position
of MI five. And he said that they
did it for two reasons.
One, they were always hassling MI five for
increased security around their embassy and other interests
in London because, of course, London
had a a reputation of giving safe haven
to Arab distance from around the world at
that point.
And MI five kept saying, well, there's no
reason to increase the threat assessment. You don't
need extra protection. So So letting off a
controlled explosion outside, of course, they immediately got
what they wanted there.
But crucially, two innocent Palestinians
were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to
cause that attack.
And
they were very active in a Palestinian support
network in London, political campaigning for the people
on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
And they were gaining some traction in the
media. They were getting quite a lot of
support. So by arresting these people and framing
them from attack and sticking them in prison,
the whole network just shattered and hasn't got
back on its feet to this day. So
that will be a clear political advantage.
It it the evidence goes back a very
long way and it's very prominent.
I'll include I'll include some of these articles,
but there's I mean, you just search. It's
it's it's actually surprising
how many articles you get. And I'm talking
from, like, The Guardian mainstream. I just grabbed
some of the ones that go into the
most detail for you. And this is the
example of Israeli agents with a history of
dressing like Palestinians. So dressing up and and
and
posing as Palestinians. Now what's crazy is we
saw this three different times now after October
7 in prominent ways where they dress up
and they raid a hospital, for example, and
shoot people in hospital beds. Like, one of
the most
I mean, textbook example of war crimes in
multiple ways, but it was a hero act
according to the, you know, corporate media.
Even though we're Hamas or not, they're in
hospital beds. There's just there are rules to
war regardless of how none of them follow,
and they just do it publicly all the
time.
This is from the Jerusalem the Jerusalem Fund,
Israeli spies disguised as Arabs. It's a very
prominent conversation. Here is Israeli soldiers dressed as
Palestinian women to assassinate Gaza Commander. That that's
post October 7.
Now post that conversation,
right, just talking about the shooting of the
embassy peep the people at the Israeli embassy,
Israel killed nine Palestinian journalists just this past
week. Over a hundred kids as well, 14,000
about to start to death, but, you know,
those things don't matter.
That that's what that's what the narrative is
being what they're instilling in people, that these
things don't matter because they might be Hamas.
Right? So we'll ignore it entirely.
That sure makes sense.
Even though regardless of whether they're Hamas, they're
still journalists and an idea that they are
Hamas is never proven. And on top of
that, that Hamas is funded by Israel, which
never gets talked about, but who cares about
all of that? So before we finish with
just the crimes of what Israel's been doing,
let's talk about a few of the other
parts.
Lebanon, Syria,
Iran, how these all play into it. Now
Michael Tracy points this clip out from little
mark little little little Marco Rubio where he
says, not a spicy viral clip, but Rubio
gave some highly clarifying remarks at his set
in hearing this week. He confirms not a
single sanction
against Russia has been lifted, and US continues
to arm to arms flowing to Ukraine.
So in other words, these Biden policies continue
unchanged.
Shocking to those of us that were I
mean, this is exactly what anybody paying attention
likely told you was nonpartisan objective because the
agenda seemed clear regardless of the partisan screaming
or the partisan screamers.
So the point is that they are still
funding Ukraine, and the war is still continuing.
And same with Gaza, same with Israel, same
with a thousand of the things that were
supposedly promises kept because somebody yelled the false
narrative.
For example,
here's Alex Jones saying major Ukraine war escalation.
50,000 Russian troops. Now this is something continuing.
We'll report on likely tomorrow and the next
day if we see this continue. The point
is there's still the war is still going
on. The Russian troops are amassing near Ukraine's
Second largest city. At least till the reports
are coming out. We'll see how this develops.
My point, though, is that this is, I
mean, only interestingly developing because of the conversation
that they're supposed to be in some kind
of a ceasefire conversation. The reality is that
broke down a long time ago. They're still
going on like we see with Gaza, but
you understand. Is anyone still pretending like Hamas
and Israel are coming to some agreement regardless
of what the people scream out loud? That
we that lost back with Blinken was saying
the same thing over and over, and we
kept finding out he was lying. My point
is,
but I thought you told us Trump ended
the war over a month ago. Promises kept?
I mean, that's the thing, guys. That was
remember, that wasn't like maybe. That was like,
it's over. We did it. We told you.
So it's like Netanyahu breaking with Trump. We
told you. We told we predicted it. Maybe.
But when it goes the other direction, we
never stop and go, well, you said you
knew for a fact or your source is
promised or now you you claimed right. It's
not just him. He's just a prominent example
of people that are seemingly
manipulating you every day. My opinion, anyway. Hopefully,
you can consider the reality of all this.
Here, as decenter news, Robbie points out, was
the repeated claim of ending this on day
one. Or I even arrive at the Oval
Office, I will have the disastrous war between
Russia and Ukraine
settled. It will be settled quickly. You see
my point, like, anybody else who's an adult
in the room is going like, well, that's
probably highly unlikely, but I hope so. Right?
I mean, it's it's a promise in politics.
We all know that's what they do, and
you can even argue he's being hyperbolic.
That I just that he just meant quickly.
Right? But see, when you said that then,
you got called a anti Trump hater because
he'll do it. Watch. He could do anything.
And then when it inevitably did not happen,
well, give him some time. I said, okay.
That's what I said in the first place.
But now here we are, and it's not
going anywhere. And it just becomes, well, they
didn't want to do or it's because of
that. Whatever.
My argument wasn't this is a narrative why.
It was that we I argue it was
not going to happen. The rest of it's
narrative, and it's because I don't think they
actually want this to happen. I think that
in the interest of Israel and The United
States that they want to accomplish something in
this area. They don't want, unless Russia's involved,
which is certainly worth considering in some larger
play, that they want that area, Israel in
particular. You can even argue going back to,
like, the idea of, like, the original Zion
from the perspective of Zionism.
It's supposed to be Ukraine.
There's something going on around all this. Even
Ukraine, as you've seen before, calls itself wants
to
turn itself into a big Israel. Remember that?
These things matter.
Zelensky wants Ukraine to be a big Israel.
Here's the road map. We saw it with
Syria, where suddenly they wanna become like Israel.
They wanna work with Israel. It's it's very
clear.
There's more going on here. Thank you.
I will get the problem solved, and
I will get it solved in rapid order,
and it will take me no longer than
than one day. I know exactly what to
say to each of them. I got along
with very well with him. Please. Dear president,
I will have that war settled in one
day, twenty four hours.
You stressed it over and over and over.
How would you settle that war in one
day? And then we ask how. There's never
anything of substance. Because I'll meet with Putin.
I'll meet with Zelensky.
They both have weaknesses, and they both have
strengths. And within twenty four hours, that war
will be settled. It'll So I'm Trump and
I can do it is his argument. And,
you know, there's that that's not an I
mean, sure, he does know probably their weaknesses.
He probably does know some level of of
because I I do give him credit when
it comes to being able to maneuver when
it comes to deals like this. That's the
one thing I shouldn't say that. There's things
that I'll give him credit for. But in
that case, you know, he's pretty cutthroat. Read
his books, read what he's told you about
himself, that he will do whatever it takes
to get it done. And at some level,
that's respected in business, but it also shows
a level of dishonesty
proudly in that conversation.
And that's what the point was, that's what
he wanted you to think because that worked
for his interest didn't happen. That's the point.
Regardless of the narrative, it didn't because it
was not likely going to happen, and I
argue they didn't want that to happen. So
all of that.
Is that because they're aligned with the with
Biden's administration, or are they all the same,
or it's because there's an agenda that your
government is carrying out? That's what I think.
Now on to Syria,
Rubio says Syria is maybe weeks away from
a full scale civil war of epic proportions.
Oh, really?
You mean the terrorist organizations that you let
take over the area for Israel? Israel's literally
occupying. It's their building locations, and you're worried
about civil war. So that means either Israel
is doing that or is allowing it to
happen, and nobody cares that they're just there
building out. I mean, it's just so transparently
dishonest that these people are either allowing Israel
to do whatever it wants or it's covering
for what it's doing. On top of that,
hiding the fact that they literally allowed this
group that they thirty seconds ago were telling
you were terrorists to take this and now
support them. And now we're worried about a
civil war that they're creating
because they're carrying out massive ethnic cleansing. It's
just so transparent.
And Daniel McAdams says dummies in the US
government should not have backed Al Qaeda in
Syria. It's really not rocket science. Assad kept
the country together, and he hated Al Qaeda.
Who why overthrown? And he's doing this for
base for you know, he's the point is
he'll answer just like I will. I promise
you. This is just for frame this for
people that are new to it. The the
reality is, guys, that they had an interest
in this or rather an interest in getting
Assad out of the way no matter what
the cost.
And now that all they're gonna do is
exploit the thing they caused. That is government
one zero one.
Put the history of the region. When Syria
is unstable, the region becomes unstable.
Yep. So that means that they've kept it
unstable for this long, which has allowed the
region to be unstable. Now whether you agree
that's exactly how it equals, the point is
if you just take him at face value,
he just literally told you that it's unstable
because we've kept it unstable. But that's not
what you people will frame it as because
they wanna pretend that it's they've not done
that. Are we really gonna pretend that multiple
left right administrations have maintained Syria as a
d as a failed state for a long
time now? I shouldn't call it failed state
until at least now, but destabilized to the
point where it's causing less and I mean,
they are openly telling you what they are
if you're just smart enough to pay attention
and not just blindly go along with whatever
they say they are. And this has certainly
been true after the Arab Spring led to
the Assad rebellion against Assad, and that really
destabilized the entire region. No. No. See, that
was them doing it, which is again the
case. You can easily prove this. Even the
lies of them shooting their protesters has been
broken down many times over just like we
saw in Venezuela, just like we saw them
try to do in every other location we've
talked about. They are the ones doing this.
They create or or in Iran or in
Ukraine. It's insanely obvious how they manufacture. They
kill their own people or somebody else, blame
it on the other side, and roll this
into what they want. Or you could take
places like Haiti.
Right? Where the chaotic. There's or there's or
Libya, where they don't care. Why why don't
they care that there's not a controlling faction?
Why don't they care that there's not elections?
Because they don't care. They want they they
only use the need for elections
to rationalize what they need to do in
a country to get what they want, which
is pretty much never elections unless it's a
frame to get what they want in the
position.
They don't care about democracy or the outcome.
They care about using that to achieve their
ends. And then it turned Syria, frankly, into
a playground for jihadist groups, including ISIS and
others that used it to operate and to
destabilize their their partners. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. As
in as in US government Israeli apparatus. That
is their proxy elements that they created, ISIS,
Al Qaeda. They're literally working with them right
now. That is the group that's in charge.
How can he sit them with a straight
face and make that point? And then and,
you know, my point as well is everyone
sitting out there at at well, I shouldn't
say that. I have a very low opinion
of most people in these congressional positions, but
some of them absolutely know that Al Qaeda
is the one to control. And he just
made the point that they're allowed to happen.
Now they're working with them.
I just I mean, this is what's so
frustrating. It's like, I I wonder if just
literally everybody knows this. And it's all just
about playing the partisan games, and we all
act like we're don't you know, that it's
like with COVID.
Ninety percent of us see it, but we
don't allow it to be seen as that.
So you have this change in December.
In my view, which I've discussed with many
of you individually is the bad news is
that the transitional authority figures, they didn't pass
their background check with the FBI.
They've got a tough history and one that
we understand.
Are you effing kidding me? You mean you
mean,
Jelani?
The guy that you literally had a bounty
for in his head, but you weren't sure
he wasn't gonna be the guy you wanted?
I mean, he really he he he's literally
looking in the face and saying, I think
you're the dumbest person on the planet.
But on the flip side of it is,
if we engage them, it may work out,
it may not work out. If we did
not engage them, it was guaranteed to not
work out. In fact, it is our assessment
that, frankly, the transitional authority, given the challenges
they're facing, are maybe weeks,
not many months away from potential collapse and
a full scale civil war of epic proportions.
Basically Which suits their interest in every possible
way for the next decade to come. The
country's splitting up. The good news is You
mean the Balkanization of Syria, which is exactly
what they wanted from day one. Going back
to Brzezinski.
Sabigbee Brzezinski and the Balkanization of Middle East.
They've been screaming about this in particular in
Syria for a long time. They're gonna carve
it out for well, assuming Israel lets anybody
else have any of it. Greater Israel is
a huge part of it. The Kurdish Kurdistan,
that's part of it. They've been talking about
this forever, but now we're gonna act like
it's some kind of a like a organic
reaction.
They just really bank on you being the
dumbest person in the room, and I don't
believe that most of us are like that.
I think they just hope that the partisan
liars will carry this forward. That there is
a Syrian national identity. It is one of
the places in the Middle East where Alois
and Druze and Christians and Sunni and Shia
have lived along and Kurds have lived. Yeah.
Under Assad. I mean, it's so insane that
that's exactly what we were saying this entire
time, and they were trying to tell you
that they're he's a jihadist maniac.
And you could prove that at the third
largest Christian population in all of the Middle
East before they started doing what they were
doing.
It just, you know, it just makes me
angry that people like this who know they're
lying will play
the savior.
That's my point as always. That's the worst
of the worst. A murderer is bad, but
one that pretends to be helping people is
the is the worst person in the room.
These people are villains.
Alongside each other underneath the banner of a
Syrian identity until it was broken by a
butcher,
Assad who pit pitted them against each other.
Yeah. So they face a number of challenges.
And don't forget, he's now national security adviser
as well as the secretary of state. I
mean, this guy this guy has now two
major positions, and he's using that to manipulate.
Also, let's not forget that it's transparent. What's
going on is you can look it up
for yourself as and this was 12/10/2024.
As Israel further occupies Syria, Western backed ISIS
patch wearing terrorists begin executions. So as he
references ISIS,
at the moment this started, you had them
acting with ISIS patches out for Israel. You
also have examples all over the place of
people wearing literal ISIS patches while working for
The US controlled Ukraine Azov movement.
It's all right on the surface, guys.
Now in Libya, you might have missed. There's
just one point, but it's everywhere, every day.
Ask Craig Murray. He'll tell you. Israel just
bombed an entire residential area in Lebanon. Did
you even hear about that? On the twenty
second,
Violated security council resolution SCR 17 o one,
ceasefire agreement, which they never cared about, and
international law with absolutely no consequences.
Another crime, and the ICC remains silent.
Probably because they just got attacked
in the sense of him getting his bank
account shut down.
Bank account shut down. Email shut down. So
that means that other people in there are
gonna be much less likely to want to
go after it, which is what it seems
like is happening, slowly drifting into the background
as they literally bomb entire civilian areas inside
of Lebanon.
Or as Greg Stoker points out, we already
saw this, I think, a very deliberate leak,
which I already referenced earlier
in in the past show. As he says,
CNN, a go to mechanism for controlled intelligence
leaks,
is citing US Intelligence Officials, this was on
the twentieth,
that Israel is preparing a possible strike on
Iranian nuclear facilities. We've heard this circulating around.
Right? We've heard this being discussed, being floated
by all the partisans out there as, you
know, one way or another. Certainly possible. I
mean, look, the idea that Israel would attack
Iran is not something you should ignore.
But that they want you to know about
this is quite obvious in my opinion. And
to pretend that The US in any way,
Donald Trump, Vance, or any of them are
resistant at all is embarrassing.
They were the ones that came out hot
right when they got in the position talking
about Iran. He said, you better stop Iran
or we're gonna do what he say? His
usual typical bombastic thing, you know, something you've
never seen before or actions never before seen,
which, I mean, guess, only means biological, you
know, but they mean attack you is the
point.
So if we're not pretending, like, somehow, The
US is the one trying to stave off
the attack on Iran, it's just embarrassing that
we keep in these arguments for the people
that have an interest in making it seem
like his administration
is not what it obviously is.
This is potentially an inter in an intentional
leak, Greg Stoker points out,
meant to stave off a move that could
compromise the stalling
Iran deal. The the stability of the re
of the region
and whatever burgeoning business deals were floated during
Trump's visit to Riyadh. So a leak meant
to stave off to stop what could compromise.
Basically, I get the sense that the argument
is
that this is,
from Israel's side of it, the leaked intentional
aspect to float the idea that we will
attack if you don't do what we want,
which in most ways will probably drive Iran
to not do what they what, you know,
that they protect, like, to to reach a
deal. And I think that's what Israel wants.
I don't think Israel wants Iran to make
another deal. Israel's the reason they broke the
last one. But it says Israel doesn't have
the capacity to dismantle Iran's nuclear program without
US support and direct intervention, so this could
and should be viewed as another attempt to
draw The US into another war, which is
what I think as well.
So here's Clint. He says, if Israel decides
to bomb Iran, I just want it known
in advance
that they are on their own in that
fight.
Who does he think he that's an intro
who are you speaking for? All Republicans? That
seems like a strange thing to say, but
The US is done with the Middle East.
No money, no munitions, no troops, nothing. Any
GOP member that disagrees should be prepared to
be primaried. So that's my point. It's like,
what party are you looking at? Like, the
it's so obvious the Trump administration has been
openly threatening Iran this whole time. So if
they go after
and attack Iran, I I guarantee you that
the US government, the current administration will blindly
back them.
I just find it interesting, this kind of
projected
what the desired reality of what this side
is doing is
just frustrating because it's not what they're actually
doing. But it may make you feel better
when you think that's what you hope they're
doing, but hope is not what should be
driving our our discussions.
But as Andy Warr points out, Iran says
it will hold US accountable for any Israeli
attack, which is obvious because you know they're
involved. And that's my point is even right
now, you can see that they're gonna rec
if they're gonna, from their perspective, recognize The
US is involved either way,
then you already know what's gonna happen. The
US government is not going to back down.
That's pretty obvious, regardless of the detriment, regardless
of the fallout to you.
But we'll have to wait and see what
happens because, ultimately,
I think there's a lot of different parts
that could stop this, slow this down.
But the what I'm most concerned about is
as this gets more and more desperate for
Israel, that this will be the driving factor.
So to end with some Israel overlap in
what they're doing, I'll I'll I'll play a
clip from Jeffrey Sachs on this weird Piers
Morgan
evolution is just kind of hilarious and terrifying.
Like, it's like he has been he's such
a fair weather journalist. It's sad. So the
point is all of a sudden, clearly, a
lot of them have been given the rein,
the the the they've given the leash to
to start calling out Israel. You know, after
a year plus of genocide, very brave of
you.
But what's interesting is now they're getting attacked
from Israel. Like, so you get in, like,
the Israel's Propagandist online going, you know, you
shouldn't you know, going after Piers and him
talking back to him. But if you watch
the show, he's still pulling punches where it
matters.
But nonetheless, he'll have people like this on.
But I think this is here here's my
point the broader point of this. It's opportunism,
which
should never allow you to think that Pierce
is an honest person or that he believes
what he's saying, but
I'll I'll take this every day of the
week. That's what I keep saying. Get not
that we ever trust and believe in and
support it, but we'll point to it. Then
you get other opportunists that will go, okay.
There's a benefit for me to call out
Israel
on top of the possible detriment. They will
dare come after me and call me a
racist or get my show taken down. If
you give enough opportunity, if you show them
enough benefit, whether politician or anything else, some
of the ones that may not have as
much reach may decide to take that chance.
And again, that doesn't mean they're honest or
they should ever trust them, but you can
still go, that's correct. And maybe they gain
from it. And good. Gain from the truth,
even if you're using it, is something in
the moment I will I'm okay with. Because
right now, I don't see many options.
I think right now, what's important is to
highlight that this is the truth. And I'll
always call out Pierce because I think he's
a clown. But
his be bringing this up to being stated,
I think, is important because it does get
reach and it is opening minds. But just
make sure you hear the first part on
that because I think it's the most important
part in all of this is that we
lean into the truth wherever it is, but
we're very clear that we're even even if
it's somebody you do that you can trust,
you still shouldn't.
That's always the overarching point here. Question everything
all the time while considering all possibilities. Here's
what Jeffrey had to say.
Israel,
what this Israeli government is doing is catastrophic.
It is a genocide.
It's extraordinarily
cruel.
It's extraordinarily
vulgar,
vicious,
ugly.
It's it's disgusting
beyond imagining.
And
the problem is a very basic one, Piers,
which is that, there are two peoples living
in what used to be mandatory Palestine when
when Britain controlled,
Palestine after World War one, that there are
the Arab Muslims and there are the Jews.
And
there need to be
two states.
One that is, for the Jews and one
that is for the Muslim, Arabs.
The problem is that Netanyahu
and his ilk
and, a lot of the political,
elite class
for decades has And that's Trump.
That's Biden.
That's all of it. Guys, that that is
the elitist background.
That's Palantir. You know, that's the point to
think about is this guy is an absolute
monster that's recognized
by monsters, and it is superior supported by
damn near every major and that could be
blackmailed, that could be influenced, that could be
because they're Zionist.
It matters, but it to understand that it's
the reality, it's irrelevant. It's just the fact
that we see the largest power structures in
the world are either blindly adherent, bought off,
influenced, blackmailed, or a part of this problem.
Just we need to come to terms with
that.
Ted,
we will rule
over
everybody.
There will never be a Palestinian state.
There are many motivations for that
view. On top of the fact that they've
been arming and funding Hamas in order to
keep them divided, which even Horets reported by
after October 7. You have different
members of their government current and path who
have told you that.
Now it's nuanced. It's not that they just
you know, it's there but it Robert and
I have talked about this, and it gives
you a very nuanced perspective, but ultimately become
the same point that, yes, they were publicly
doing this in or rather now public in
order to keep them divided.
So you can't ignore that. This game of
playing, oh, it's all if you're gonna call
out Hamas, you have to highlight that they
were giving money into the hands of the
people they claim they're fighting in order to
keep them divided in the West Bank and
Gaza.
So and there's obviously relevance to that on
who is
responsible at least to some degree. But we
can't have a day one honest conversation about
this. Only now are we get beginning to
see the lies fall away.
One is perhaps Netanyahu's
view. This is the only way we can
be secure.
The other,
which is also very popular among,
parts of the Israeli
government is, that God promised us everything.
These other people are on our land.
Now
whatever you say about it,
there is no endgame of peace
on the Netanyahu plan
because the Netanyahu plan, and this has been
for decades,
is to rule over
the entire land.
And that means ruling over the Palestinians
either in an apartheid state, in other words,
oppressing,
the, Palestinian
people, or killing them
or expelling them in ethnic cleansing.
It's clear that all of those methods are
deliberately being used now.
This constant shouting, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas,
is not the point at all.
The point is
that the political endgame
for Netanyahu,
Smotrich,
Ben Gavir, the leaders of this government is
to rule over
the entire
territory
of what was mandatory Palestine. In other words,
for Israel to control everything. In fact, Netanyahu
makes
no
no no bones about it. He doesn't hide
anything. He says, we will control Gaza. Well,
what does that mean? It either means extraordinary
oppression
or it means ethnic cleansing
or it means mass murder.
And now Israel's committing mass murder right now.
It says, it is as simple as that.
And Israel says, well, it's about Hamas, but
what is their endgame that they offer? They
don't offer an endgame.
They are very clear
on the inside. I I know what the
endgame is because,
if you follow the Israeli politics,
the endgame is we control
everything.
In fact, some of this extremist coalition
is so
vulgarly,
rapidly,
violently extreme
that their interpretation
of, quote, God's promise
to the Jewish people is,
parts of Egypt,
parts of Syria, parts of Lebanon. Right. They
have a very expansive view, and indeed Israel
is in Syria now. It is in Lebanon
now. And there are parts of this coalition
that say, we're gonna stay there.
So the problem, Pew, is is a political
problem.
It it you're completely right. It cannot be
solved
by war or defeating Hamas. That's not even
their purpose. Their
Yeah. You gotta love how oh, you're right.
After you've been screaming the opposite for a
year. You're right. You know what I mean?
Just, like, I shouldn't say that that there's
more nuance to some degree, but, really, if
you condemn Hamas, you know, that kind of
ridiculous thing for the longest time.
But that's how this works. Right? These these
are the very people, like, just like after
Iraq, all of screaming idiots out there that
were wrong the entire time were the ones
that got raised up, and those that dared
to call out the truth were the ones
that got punished for it. That's the way
and and whether it's subconscious or right on
the surface, people that fall in this bit
you know, in the
different levels of this business end up recognizing
that. So they pull their punches. They lean
into the two party illusion, how it works,
Which is why, for whatever reason, we've been
able to grudgingly build this over a decade
plus, two steps forward, one step back,
because you believe in us.
But it has been grueling. And it's still
to this very moment, we're being pushed back
every way they can.
Obvious reasons why. Thank you for your support.
Purpose is to control
all the land.
What they call Greater Israel
or Israel Hashlema,
mean the big expanse of Israel.
It's a madness.
It's a zealotry. It's a cruelty.
It's nothing less than that. And there is
no peace possible
until there is a
state of Palestine
living in peace on
the internationally
recognized borders, which are the borders of the
06/04/1967
alongside
Israel.
What
Netanyahu would never tell you,
what, this,
Doron Spielman who was shouting, just a moment
ago would never tell you
is that all of the Arab states
have said,
we will have peace when there is a
state of Palestine. Mhmm. What they won't tell
you is that the entire
57
member organization of Islamic cooperation
has said, we will have peace with Israel
when there is a state of Palestine as
a UN member state
properly
constituted. Mhmm. And so they've actively gone out
of their way to stop the one thing
that would cause. I mean, you could you
could play they're lying, But the point is,
realistically, you can pretty, in a lot of
ways, see that it's very unlikely,
especially that it's in their interest. But the
point is it's never even given a chance.
And on top of that, what do we
say about the nuclear dynamic? Every time, or
whether it's Iran that puts it forward or
anybody else. It come this I mean, this
happens almost every year as far as I
can remember where they come out and they
say, look. We want we'll we call for
a non nuclear Middle East. That every country,
including Israel, has to new
disarm their nuclear arsenal.
And and then we'll do it we'll do
the same thing.
Iran leaving get rid of its civilian program.
And and and everyone agrees every country except
Israel, so The US says no.
And that's it's it's transparent.
Of course, the argument is they don't really
mean it, but that's
possible.
But the idea that you aren't even willing
to consider that possibility. Why? Because they're gonna
destroy us if we get rid of what?
The thing that you claim you don't have?
It's just it's just such a mire. This
whole conversation
is crazy.
And in fact
and you know I hang out at the
United Nations.
More than a 80
countries of the world
say this
with a population of more than 95%
of the world
population.
There is a a madness,
a sickness
of the Israeli,
government, this extremist,
cruel and
zealot government.
But the the tragic part is The United
States Mhmm. And parts of Europe
have backed up
this vile behavior.
It's coming out every which way.
So here's Benjamin Netanyahu saying, last night, Washington,
something perfect or horrific happened, talking about the
shooting. But But he goes on
to say, so here are the facts. So
first, I'll read you what Torah Jews points
out as he lists off a bunch of
things that you could prove are false.
Netanyahu, you are no Jewish leader. This is
a different
Orthodox Jewish organization. This one has 56,000
followers.
You are no Jewish leader. You exploit, distort,
and endanger all Jews to substantiate your hideous
actions. The only thing you care about is
land no matter how much pain and lives
are lost in the in the way. May
god protect us from evil, the evils of
Zionism.
I just you know, in every, I point
the obvious out. Even if you think it's
only a small percentage, there is a portion
of Orthodox Jews that very much see Zionism
as not I mean, then you if knowing
that's the case, you just can't keep pretending
that it is only people that hate Jews.
It's just not the reality.
Zionism is a political organization that's taken advantage
of the Jewish religion.
But here is what he says. I'm only
gonna focus on one important part of this,
but read the whole thing. It's amazing what
he thinks he can get away with. He
says, here are the facts. Remember, this is
on
05/22/2025.
Since October 7, he says, Israel said 92,000
aid trucks. Now here's what's crazy about this.
That's false. But what's wild, and I've done
this every time they never pull given you
a fake number.
If you break that down,
it comes out to oh, I I knew
I was gonna where I did I forget
it? Hold on.
Let me just do it on my my
calculator again really quickly. I can do it
on my computer. The point is right here,
you can say, okay. How many days has
it been? Five hundred ninety three days since
October 7. Okay? So if you do the
math
I'll just do it again real quick since
I deleted the number. I wanna give you
the exact number.
593
divided by ninety two thousand.
And that comes out to
hundred and fifty five. Okay.
So that may sound like a lot, except
when you understand that when this is an
old old one going back
to 2024,
the point is simply that they have it
listed. As you know, if you follow the
show, that before
October 7,
there were 500 trucks including fuel that came
through every day,
and that was maintaining
a level of food insecurity.
Two two point two plus million people. So
the reality is and the only reason they
need that is because Israel's never afforded them
the right of return, which is their right.
So they've maintained refugee status because they don't
have they have the keys to a house
they'll never get to go back to. And
so Israel's maintained that. And now coming to
the fort to this day, pretending like they're
mooching off the system even though they're the
ones that have made sure it didn't happen.
And remember, as they get people removed or
pushed out of certain areas, they're forcing them
to sign documents that say they were they
give up their right of return despite telling
the world that doesn't exist. It's just there's
nothing but dishonesty coming from these monsters, Zionists.
The point is that over 500 trucks, or
rather just 500 a day, and they were
maintaining food insecurity. They were struggling.
So the point is beyond that, if it's
less than 500, then it's not even remotely
meeting what was barely maintaining what was already
happened, and they were already struggling.
So if you look and you're they're telling
you that and you can understand that means
a hundred plus, then they're already admitting to
you that we weren't even maintaining half of
what was necessary to keep them fed and
not die. And so on top of that,
we can prove that the number right there
is also false. And on top of that,
the claim that they say Hamas stole it
all has been disproven by everybody, including even
parts of their government. But here's let me
let me show you this.
Drop site news. Not at all. World Food
Programme director rejects the claim that Hamas is
stealing aid.
It's man made
catastrophe with Israeli authorities blocking the entry of
all aid from,
March until about May 18. The Trump administration
said Israel needs to let in food. So
are your deliveries consistently
now getting through?
Well, let's start with the fact that this
is a catastrophe, and you're absolutely correct. And
I'm very grateful that you're covering this issue.
They have let a few trucks in. This
is a drop in the bucket as to
what's needed. Mhmm.
Right now, we have 500,000
people inside of Gaza that are that are
extremely
food insecure
and could be on the verge of famine.
If we don't help bring them back from
that, we need to get in, and we
need to get in at scale, not just
a few dribble of the trucks. Right now,
it's a as I said, there's a drop
in the bucket.
So how many trucks need to be getting
in daily to address the scale of the
need you see, and and can they get
into Northern Gaza?
Well, prior to the you know, during the
ceasefire, I should say, we were getting in
600
trucks a day.
Right now, we're getting in maybe a hundred,
something like that. So it Now realize that
well before this, that's the general reality. In
the argument of ever reaching that, I don't
think that's I mean, right now, what you
could prove is that even when these came
in, as as people from the World Food
Programme, people from,
Doctors Without Borders, people on the ground, journalists
made it clear that they were not letting
this reach the people that needed it. Not
Hamas,
as they're gonna make clear here in every
other possible way, or the flower massacre where
they tried desperately to blame it on Hamas,
but you could prove it with their own
videos. They got caught lying about what happened.
They simply put the truck out and then
shot everybody.
I mean, it's just transparent.
So realizing that even that with and the
numbers that they claim, even the trucks that
are going in are largely not going to
people who need it. And they claim that
there are people that are weaponizing it and
selling it for high prices. I think it
was Dan Cohen and others did and I
think it was DropSite did a great work
showing you that they were the very ones
that were weaponizing these gangs that were then
doing that at the behest of the Israeli
government. It just it's it and if you
think that doesn't make sense, look in the
history. Look back as far as you want.
They've been doing this for the longest time,
weaponizing everything against them to torture these people.
It's not nearly enough, and it needs to
be going to the correct places. So the
various gates, it's inconsistent as to how the
gates are open. It's inconsistent as to the
roads we can use. The roads that are
the better roads, the ones that can get
us further along aren't open at all.
It's complicated right now. And and, again, I
will tell anybody who will listen, we need
to get in and get in at scale
and be allowed to feed these people before
a further catastrophe occurs. And, of course, the
point is even if they had actually gotten
600 for a period of time, that even
remember, 500 a day before this was me
maintaining food insecurity.
So even then, the point was you could
look back. The UN was calling for more
to go in, and you Israel was maintaining
a low caloric intake. They were doing that
on purpose. They made that public. So the
point is that even if they got the
600, as they're in the middle of a
famine, which we'll show you in again, there
is a whole portion that are famine level
according to the only one of the main
groups that that identify these things, the IPC,
which is that they would need way more
than that to be able to re basically
pull them out of that position.
So it's just in every possible metric, they're
lying. And not only that, see, half the
time, people like Elon Levy come out and
say that there's not not only are they
not starving, but they've got more food than
ever.
Just
despicable.
Your organization
announced at least 15 of your trucks were
looted when they entered
Southern Gaza on route to to bakeries.
Israel has consistently said that the looting is
being
carried out by Hamas. Listen up. Have you
seen evidence that it is Hamas stealing the
food? Look at that. Shaking her head. No.
Not at all. Not not, in this round.
Listen.
These people are desperate, and they see a
World Food Programme truck coming in, and they
run for it. Now that's part of it.
Right? Be because they're literally starving to death.
So, yeah, they're they're desperate, guys, and then
you can't blame them for being desperate when
they're starving. But on top of that,
right, it's it's there there as there's been
many reports from these gangs that are in
fact taken advantage. And you can clearly prove,
as I just told you, there's
a lot of investigative or independent journalists that
have been breaking this down long before October
7 forward where these people are working with
the Israeli government. I even covered a report
a while back from Time magazine talking about
the tunnels that brought things in from over
from, you know, other parts of the world
and that Israel was aware of those tunnels
in plain view and allowed it to happen
because they used it as a justification
to shut things down when they wanted to
or use those tunnels to bring in for
operations or any number of things.
It's it's it goes back so long, and
it's just people are only just becoming aware
of these things because of October 7 forward.
So it's easy to play on things like
that.
This, this doesn't have anything to do with
Hamas or any kind of organized crime or
anything. It has simply to do with the
fact these people are starving to death. And
so we will continue to go in. We
will continue to go in with food
and the kinds of supplies we need to
help the bakeries operate and make sure that
we can continue to do that and and
hopefully be able to do more of it.
But, again, we can't do this unless the
world community puts pressure on this.
We can't be allowed to sit back and
watch these people starve to death with no
outside diplomatic influence to help us.
These these these poor souls are really, really,
really desperate. And,
you know, having been in in a food
riot myself some years ago, I understand the
desperation very well.
Well, five days ago, prime minister Netanyahu,
vowed to take control of all of Gaza,
which seems to be a shift from going
in, carrying out raids, and then withdrawing.
We've seen the pope speak out. We've seen
the leaders of France, of Canada, of The
UK calling the cutting of aid egregious.
Netanyahu said criticism like that is feeding
Hamas
and
really feeding antisemitism.
What do you make
Genie. Of that push Genie. Who could have
seen that excuse coming? It's anti Semitic. You're
a racist for calling out the fact that
we're starving children. Of course. Makes sense. Back
from him that criticisms of the state
are feeding hate.
What I do know is you're not feeding
people,
and the most important part of this is
that's what we're supposed to be doing. I'm
very grateful for anyone, the pope, any of
the folks that did did shout out. I'm
I'm gonna cut it short there. You you
can watch the rest in a couple more
minutes, but it's it's that's the good point.
Hamas not doing it. They're calling it racist
for pointing out what we can all prove
they're not doing. It it just never stops.
And here is the IPC.
Right? This this is one of the groups
that is their job is to verify these
things. And it's the
integrated food security phase classification.
And as it says and this this was
from, I think, few months ago. Famine is
imminent for one point one million people. Catastrophic
food insecurity.
The report's in there. You can read it
for yourself. Here's the flower massacre. The flower
massacre setup, false flag attempt exposed. Actually, I
think this was part two. I think we
covered one before that as well.
It's very clear. They this is what they're
doing. Everyone can see it. It's about people
that are have an interest in keeping narratives
going,
in my opinion.
Here's the UN,
the, OCHA,
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs. You know, we've shown you this was
the one from before, and it just shows
you that you could see right here that
they were in the beginning,
you know, they literally brought it down to
zero for almost a month
when they were already feeling secure, which just
set them off, guaranteeing that they were never
really gonna recover until they got a dramatic
amount, like, a lot more than they needed.
And they never once went over even 200.
Never even got to half what they're doing
before, and they always pretend like they were
doing everything they were supposed to. They were
lying.
Now this one is is from, I believe,
the twenty first of this month.
Read through this. I I mean, look at
the map, by the way. Take a look
at the Gaza map.
Say so for those in the podcast, it
what what's that? Like, 80% of the entire
area? And here's what these letter the the
colors mean. Purple is Israel a militarized zone
that Israel controls.
The dark, the, maroon or rather the red
areas under displacement orders, meaning they're they're being
forced out of the area. Right?
That's most everywhere. And then you got the
white, which is permanently closed crossings.
And then the the the like, our guys
are the gray. The white is, I guess,
what's open.
I mean, look at that.
They're pretending, like, somehow, this is not them.
Just they've
there are people 2,000,000 people rather the million
that probably still survived, if not less, that
are jammed into a fraction of the entire
place, which was already one of the most
densely populated place on the planet. And then
they've got no water, no food. They have
tents they're living in. They have no medical
care. They're it's dusty and dangerous, and they're
sick. I mean, these people are being slowly
murdered.
Everyone can see it.
Food insecurity,
100%.
One hundred % of the population
is facing high levels of food insecurity,
classified as phase three or above.
Over a million of them,
emergency levels, phase four.
Four hundred and 70 thousand are phase five,
famine level.
Not hard to see.
You can read through all this. I mean,
the numbers are mind blowing.
82% of croplands have been destroyed.
65%
of their water facilities, 90% of the households,
they don't have any water.
And and even but then remember, well before
this, it was something like 3% of the
water was drinkable. And it's just disgusting
where they were before, let alone now while
they're being
genocided in front of our eyes. But you
can look at the transition here. What they're
trying to show you is look. The red
number here is humanitarian organizations that canceled their
request because of Israel not letting them through.
The dark or that's the top. That's the
the light red. The dark red is just
flatly denied, which Israel doesn't let through. So
just look right here. From May,
a hundred and five of what they're claiming
are being sent in were denied by Israel,
and they claimed those.
15 of them were impeded.
39 of them
were accepted.
39
out of one sixty seven, which was the
total for all of May.
And yet, here he stands telling that they're
feeding everybody.
Here's Glenn Greenwald, same point, saying yesterday, three
countries
three, three countries long steadfastly supporting Israel,
blindly, in fact, UK, France, and Canada,
then randomly issued a joint statement that the
humanitarian crisis in Gaza has now suddenly become
unconscionable, even though it was day one, well
before October 7. Unacceptable, they said. He goes,
you'll never guess which accusation Israel's Finance Minister
made against them. Can you possibly guess that
these three countries that were blindly supporting all
and still this to this day, for the
most part, blindly support what they're doing? He
called them anti Semitic.
So if Israel if UK, France, and Canada,
who currently still support them financially and support
their genocide, are anti Semitic for briefly saying
maybe this is going too far. Can you
imagine? Think about what that means for the
word anti Semitic. Think about what that means
for anybody else being called anti Semitic. It
is meaningless,
which in fact then makes the actual antisemitism
completely okay according to the people fighting it.
Just never stops.
Here is,
this is, where what's the name? Phyllis Bennis.
We've talked about her before.
Fellow for the at the Institute for Policy
Studies and adviser to Jewish voices for peace.
You know, the group they scream are all
racist anti semitic except are Jewish.
They're just simply not okay with Zionism, and
that shows you what the real point is.
Now she is calling out what we're talking
about, antisemitism and how it's used.
This is important.
Clear that the weaponization
of false charges of antisemitism
did not start with these two terrible murders
last night.
This has got been going on for a
long time. In the Project Esther report that
I referred to earlier,
as The New York Times described it, it's
designed to undermine the Palestinian rights movement
as a way of achieving these broader goals.
And in that report,
they they discuss a new definition of antisemitism
that says
that we,
among other things, it says we recognize any
attempt to delegitimize,
boycott, divest, or sanction the modern state of
Israel,
etcetera, etcetera.
We recognize that anti Zionism and antisemitism
are the different manifestations
of the same hatred against the Jewish people.
Now that's that's that is exactly what The
U the current Trump administration
is forcing through.
Same with Biden before it and Trump to
put it out in the first place.
And and long before that, we've been seeing
the same things floated up. Like, just understand,
the the US government, both sides of it,
are absolutely right now fighting to suppress American
speech for Israel in the exact same way.
Now just because, you know, the the woke
element of hate speech and all, it's it's
if you can call that out and you're
not calling out suppression under the guise of
antisemitism,
which by the way is also included in
the hate speech category, then you're blindly ignoring
the reality
for partisan sides, team sport politics.
And it takes it it makes these incredible
allegations, which are simply not true. If we
look at basic
definitions, antisemitism
means the hatred
of Jews as Jews for what they believe.
Jew The current interpretation, by the way, let's
not forget that most people in Israel or
rather the the law the just most a
lot of Israelis are not Semites. Palestinians
are Semites.
So work that out for yourself to understand.
The point is regardless of the meaning of
words, seeing yourself today, that doesn't matter. The
way it's used is what she described. And
then what she pointing out is that Zionism
is not the same thing.
Definitions.
Antisemitism
means the hatred
of Jews as Jews for what they believe.
Judaism is a religion.
Zionism is a political movement that is now
the dominant political movement of the state of
Israel with its military, with its nuclear arsenal,
and with its continuing genocide
in Gaza. So in that context,
saying that being opposed to one is the
same as being opposed to the other, it's
simply not true, but it has a very
clear political motive. And, unfortunately, we're seeing that
it's working to some degree. The the way
the press is covering it now as something
that is, quote, clearly antisemitic,
when it is clearly not. These people were
not there's absolutely no evidence, certainly yet, that
they were that they were targeted because they
were Jews.
If they were targeted for what the
reports are saying the gunman said, they were
targeted for their connection to something Israel is
doing. It's the actions of a state.
One of them is not Jewish at all.
They're they were not targeted for being Jewish.
They were targeted
illegally, immorally,
terribly
for a perceived sense of their involvement in
the actions of a nation state. This is
a political,
understanding. This is not a religious,
bias here that we're looking at.
Mhmm. Sabineau, Phyllis touched on it. They will
always use in the most cynical way
any incident
for their own
agenda.
This is for the podcast. This is Gideon
Levy, a a columnist for Horetz Matt Horetz
Israeli newspaper.
And Jewish person himself is rarely an an
outspoken critic of a lot of this stuff,
of of Zionism, of of the the manipulation
of it and using Judaism. He talks about
a lot of this stuff.
Namely, labeling
any criticism
of Israel as anti Semitism
is Israel's
strategy for years now, and it is one
of the biggest success stories of Israel
because Israel
succeeded to paralyze
so many critics,
all over Europe and in The United States
by labeling them as antisemites.
So everything is antisemitic.
Any voice of conscience, any voice of justice
is immediately
labeled as antisemitism.
And, obviously, so And realize that even if
you're doing it in a very, very clear
way just going like, I oppose the murder.
Children are starving.
All they do is pretend that you're lying
about that because you secretly hate Jews. No.
Regardless of whether it's the truth or whether
there's any indication that's ever possible,
it's a way to cover up those things.
Now is it possible that somebody both has
sure. Of course, it's possible. But that is
that does that then make what they said
false? Usually not. My point is either way,
they will hide behind that allegation, and you'll
find Jewish people around the world who are
calling it out today.
It's falling apart.
Is also
this terrible murder in Washington
framed as anti Semitism.
It has nothing to do with anti Semitism.
As criminal
as as unjustified
it is, it has nothing to do with
antisemitism.
This was
a very bad way to express protest
against the mass killing, the bloodbath in Gaza.
You might agree or not agree
to my description,
but nobody can justify
a murder
as a as a way of protest. But
in the same time, nobody can ignore the
fact
that a terrible bloodbath is taking place in
Gaza.
And people are very, very furious,
and most of them have nothing to do
with antisemitism.
Phyllis, if I can go back to you,
The killings were a terrible thing that should
be condemned. I condemn them. This does nothing
to end the genocide in Gaza. It does
Most gist of it for the most part.
I mean, the point is the same. Is
it I I'm with all of them, including
James Lee. Like,
regardless of the
logic
you know what I mean? Like, the idea
that he you know, let's just say both
those Israelis,
whether Christian, Zionist, or or or Jewish,
let's just say they were avidly involved. They're
out there shooting people every day. I still
would not agree that it was the what
like, this is the same thing we say
in a broader sense, guys.
If you believe
in what we're trying to do, like, doing
things, you know, the constitution, for example, or
the law or what's moral and what your
principles and your your, you know, your integrity,
then to argue that it's justified, do it
you know, it's the same thing. You do
you should argue they should be put on
trial.
You should bring it out, expose it, put
them in prison because that's what our principles
are. Right? And so it's the same idea.
There are there's a lot there's a dangerous
line where people acting like you should, you
know, praise to what happened. You know? And
I just that's just not I disagree with
that flatly. That's not who we are. Know?
And there are people out there that want
that to become more the the blur of
those moral lines because that still benefits them
in the long run. It's important to think
about. Who do you want to be?
Now more things that are important to highlight.
He says, this is shocking footage showing a
displaced civilian carrying his belongings. You see these
every day, it seems. Just barely get any
more attention anymore while moving through the Al,
Shugaya
neighborhood in Gaza when Israel targeted him.
Weakened by hunger and exhaustion, he was clearly
unarmed.
And this is just being prey people are
sharing this stuff, laughing about it.
You watch for yourself, the guy just walking
along.
They target him. You can clear, you know,
they're
sizing them up, and then just bum.
This is gross. They laugh about it. They
cheer it on. They post these videos about
of them of their own. And they're literally
laughing about how we got this Palestinian. You
know, it just it disgusts me that anybody
is pretending these people are not exactly what
they look like. I don't care whether they're
Jewish or Muslim or Christian or atheist. Anyone
that is doing this, praising it, laughing about
it deserves to
be held accountable.
Yab Hassan points out today, Israeli authorities demolished
a park in the Christian city of Beth
Shahour, Bethlehem.
Palestinians, Muslims, and Christians alike suffer under the
occupation
facing the same policies and destruction and dispossession.
May 20.
Right? Because it makes sense. Right? There's is
that
necessary if you're trying to get rid of
the bad guys and take over for your
bed? Why would you do all that? I
mean, look, guys. It's just absolutely demolished. They've
got cranes in there tearing up all the
gun. Why?
That's a crime. No matter how you spin
it. There's no Hamas tunnels under there, if
ever.
Now here, drop site news also covering this
absolute monster speaking with BBC.
And, again, you'll find it interesting, the shift
in tone.
I mean, you have to ask what shifted
and why. I I'm expecting there's to be
some kind of a shift personally, that there's
gonna be an argument that maybe, you know,
one part of the Israeli government is the
one they are the bad ones. You know,
Netanyahu goes to jail. I don't know. I
just I get I do not believe for
a second that they're actually going to turn
on this agenda they've been invested in for
a daft, a century.
But you we can note the difference. They've
clearly recognized that, like I've been telling you,
that the whole damn world sees this, and
they it only hurts them to keep pretending
like we don't. So here's how this starts.
And look, these people are flailing because they
are caught, and we do see them.
You've killed tens of thousands of civilians. That's
you know, whether or not they get ever
actually held accountable, there's something else. You've killed
paramedics.
You've killed journalists.
You've even killed your you've even killed your
own hostages.
But No. Like, we don't all know. Like,
just because you have a nuance about why
that's you know, they made us do it,
doesn't mean you didn't kill them. Like, it
shouldn't no. No. They're just denying the obvious
reality at this point. Not apparently all the
Hamas fighters. Perhaps that's why the British foreign
secretary said today your government is, quote, damaging
the image of the state of Israel in
the eyes of the world.
So I would remind, those dignitaries
to look at the effort of The UK
when you fought Nazi Germany.
Oh, you did it first.
I mean, these people are juvenile.
Like, they I mean, they so your argument
is that you so first of all, that's
not true. But you did it first. So
if we did it, it would be okay.
That's
not even taking a breath. That's his argument.
How embarrassing. You know, you can speak about
civilian casualties, and you can speak about tens
of thousands of people who died in your
efforts to fight evil. Today, we are fighting
the same evil force.
It's not easy. It's hard. We are in
pain, but we are determined to Oh, they're
in pain.
Right? There's been a year long suffering of
killing children to death. God, it must be
tough. Finish the job. We will not idly
buy for the next attack against Israel because
we know nobody will be there to protect
us. Today, we have a Oh, nobody. Right?
You mean despite literally every major government in
the world standing up and giving you everything
you need and blindly supporting you? But nobody's
got our back. They always have this argument
somehow that no one supports them despite all
of these major governments always, always supporting them.
It's just this is my point, though, is
everyone with a brain cell can see how
incongruent this all is.
Country, The days when Jews were massacred and
there was no response in pain, but we
are determined to finish the job. We will
not idly buy for the next attack against
Israel because we know nobody will be there
to protect us. Today, we have a country.
The days when Jews were massacred and there
was no response are over. The day that
we asked for support from other countries are
over. Today, we have the And so this
is the new narrative. Right? Or somehow, we
don't need your support, except you quite literally
do. And we know that. They know that.
All the government supporting them know that. If
US stopped supporting them right now, the whole
thing would collapse right now. They don't know
that. So until that actually happens, you can
prove to yourself that they're not stopping their
support. The reality is he wants that to
be the statement. We're no longer needing you.
I think there this is maybe a desperate
effort to try to frame it as something
changing. I mean, why not try? They're desperate.
Capability
to defend ourselves, and that's exactly what we
are doing. We didn't start this war Wow.
But we intend to finish it without Hamas.
You you God.
This is just embarrassing. Like, I mean, do
I even need to say anything? Like, it's
just insane that he just
you know?
I I just don't I can't believe that
still to this very day, that is the
kind of response you get.
Here,
as we said in the beginning, Patrick Hennington
reports today, Israel so here he is telling
you that we're defending ourselves for a year
despite the old so October 7, all the
lies we know, Hannibal directive, the lie about
the numbers, who they killed. And due to
this to this day, it's still a year
of of defending yourself. What do I say
be in the first couple of months? I
said, what if this goes on for a
year? Are you still gonna be defending yourself
for a year? Apparently so.
This is crazy. I mean, what else if
you're they they don't know where else to
go? I mean, they they dug in. Here
they are. I mean, why you can't go,
okay. Fine. You got us. We're genociders. They're
not gonna do that. So Israel has assassinated
Red Cross workers in their homes,
a new level of war crimes that have
never before seen. He said this is French
press agency, Red Cross workers killed in their
homes.
So as they're telling you, we don't do
that. We don't kill these people. Well, here,
first of all, is a random clip of
a ran this is a a student basically
just saying what she's been taught, not a
unique statement.
There's a war. It doesn't matter who your
enemy is. You need to destroy their offspring
to prevent them from creating more offspring.
Right.
Isn't isn't that what everybody thinks? Right? You
just you murdered the children because they're they're
gonna have more children.
I mean, it's just so blithe. Right? Just
so yeah. That's what you do. Right? That's
what you do. No. That's what Zionist think.
That's that's the kind of broken
that's why this cult level infiltration kind of
dynamic is a problem. Whether it's Christian or
Muslim or atheist or whatever else, that's the
point. It's very clear what this all connects
back to.
She just says quite normal, but it's it's
it's insane. Now Adam points this out on
the twenty second.
This guy is
very adamant. Now here's what's even crazier about
this. This is not even remotely unique.
I could I I should have actually done
it. I could probably I could pull up,
like, 18 different videos of people in the
Knesset. That woman that we always point out,
even Netanyahu, Ben Smotrich, and Ben Gavir saying
point blank that the children are enemies. The
children, nobody innocent in Gaza. The president of
Israel said that right in the beginning. There
is nobody innocent in Gaza.
They just can't hide this stuff, and yet
you get people like Trump and Vance and
Blinken and Biden who just lie to you
about it. So here, he says the children
are our enemies.
Really adamant about this. And take a look
at this guy's eyes. Mean, this is what
a fanatic looks like. So the point, first,
is that children are our enemies.
Now he slips up in here, by the
way. More than that, if you think he's
I that's not a slip for him. He
owns that. He's a murderer.
But there's a slip in here too. Let
me know if you catch it. We'll talk
about it afterward.
Enemies.
Because they are The children are your enemies?
They are they are our enemies. Israel until
now
has more,
protection
of human life and children in Gaza Wow.
Than every These come on. These children are
dying of hunger because you have not been
allowing aid in this extreme. They are not
dying of hunger. Wow.
And any conflict that the that, England was
involved in the past in this kind of
environment where more innocent civilians killed and suffering
hunger and everything else. Alright. So you did
it first. Right? So if we do it,
it's not bad, but we're not doing it,
though,
every time. Mister Smudgert, your leader, has said
that the people of Gaza should leave, that
the aim is to get them to leave.
It's a combat zone. When there is a
combat zone Right. So they turn your home
into a combat zone and then criticize you
for not leaving because it's a combat zone.
Lunatics. When there is a terrorist organization
who is That you funded. Hiding behind civilians
that nobody can prove because they haven't done
it, and nobody can and even the the
evidence has shown you that Hamas is actually
protecting them, which we'll show you again in
a second. You should let them
run away.
And they don't want to run away. So
this is the argument that somehow Hamas is
forcing them all to stay. Million people.
Even though none of them wanna go because
it's their land and they refuse to leave
because they've been murdered and kicked around their
entire lives, and they're done running. They are
resilient more than anything I've ever seen.
But this lunatic
probably believes it. I don't know. Wants you
to believe that it's because Hamas is holding
them all, tied everyone to their legs, apparently.
And if you are blocking them, you're aiding
and abating a terrorist organization
using them as human shields. Did you catch
that?
You see, this is what's so insane. I
can't look. I'm not trying to posit. This
this guy's face he's he's a lunatic.
There was a slip right there.
And what I it's so easy to point
out that these people, they they have the
just they ramble off the same nonphysical talking
points. And if you're not careful, they bleed
into each other and they don't make sense
because the like we said before, you can't
keep saying that you did it first, so
if we did it, it's not bad. But
then all those also say that we didn't
do it, though. Those two things don't cut
they don't make sense together. Right? Watch. Listen
again.
Terrorist organization
who is It's to get them to leave.
It's a combat zone. When there is a
combat zone, when there is a terrorist organization
who is hiding behind civilians
When there's a terrorist organization,
he says hiding behind civilians
You should let them run. You should run
away. And if you are blocking them If
you're blocking them so the idea is that
if you're blocking the the the civilians from
running away You're aiding and abating a terrorist
organization.
Woah. Wait a minute. So who is so
the terrorist organization is aiding and abetting a
terrorist organization? No. You see what he meant
to say there is that that innocent civilians,
because that's what he's trying to tell you
in the beginning, they're all guilty,
are aiding and abetting the terrorists if they're
being blocked from running away?
What? See, you can't have it both ways.
You can't pretend that they're being forced to
stay and then say that they're guilty for
supporting them because they're being forced to stay.
That means they're being forced to stay, buddy,
if that's your argument. But you see, that
doesn't matter. They argue every in this one
sentence, he argues everything at the same time.
You could choose which one you like.
This is Zionist propaganda, guys. And on top
of that, you can quite literally prove that
they're not, as we'll show you next, that
they're one of the another hostage just stood
up and said that the only thing keeping
me safe was Hamas and that the I
was most afraid of the Israeli bombs. That's
basically everyone that's gone out of there. And
this lunatic will keep screaming the opposite. Listen
again.
Should leave Zone. When there is a terrorist
organization
who is hiding behind
civilians,
you should let them
run away. And if you are blocking them,
you're aiding and abating
a terrorist organization
using them as human shields. That's not a
moral thing to do. So now you're now
basically, you just said that the person being
forced to be a shield is now aiding
a terrorist organization.
Right? So they're guilty because they're being forced.
So are the people at a bank robbery
now guilty of the bank robbery?
So I this is the point is nobody
needs that. The only people that still believe
them are people that already know they're being
lied to and are part of the lie.
That's I truly believe that. Save for some
sliver of people out there that just have
no idea what's going on. It is wild
how clear this is. And if if United
United Kingdom
want to be a humanitarian
country
if it cares about human rights and human
lives, they would help
the cousins
who wants to leave the area,
who leave and not aid Hamas to use
them as human shields. I've got an idea.
Why don't we let them come over the
border into
Israel? Why
Yes. The classic argument because you wanna keep
them safe. Right? We'll bring them into you
said they're the good ones. Right? They're not
the bad one, the. You wanna save them.
Right? Bring them in Israel. No. We can't
do that. Why not? Because they're all terrorists.
Because they flee into Israel. Right? Enemies. Because
they are The children are your enemies? They
are they are our enemies. And according to
international
treaties about about,
refugees in the time of war Oh, now
we're citing international agreements with the UN. I
thought the UN was Hamas. Can't you get
your narrative straight? You don't let them,
conquer your country with refugees. Oh, like, so
you mean the refugees that are in Palestine
before you force them into the camps, and
now they're the ones conquering you by wanting
their land back? I I mean, I don't
know if this guy is just that deranged,
like, actually drinking his own Kool Aid or
is just really bad at trying to argue,
you know, presenting his broken narrative. I don't
even know or I frankly don't even care
at this point. That is how embarrassingly stupid
this all is.
This is why it's not hard to see
that people aren't buying this anymore. The only
reason it was working before is because people
were afraid to be called racist. And now
that has lost its power because of morons
like that. They call everything anywhere antisemitic if
they want to.
Here
are some of the children. Now I'm sorry.
These aren't super graphic, but it's still upsetting.
Matt Kennard says, this is Zionism.
No civilized world can coexist with it. It
must be dismantled in full.
This is one of the many children that
are suffering. This is from Gaza. This this
is a guy the the the the enemies
that that guy just told you are he
this is his enemy, that child.
Does that sound like a normal person?
Here is Smotrich.
He says the IDF is finally conducting a
campaign against the civilian rule of Hamas and
not just focusing on the military infrastructure.
We are eliminating ministers, officials,
money changers, and elements of the economic governmental
system. Because it's just
they're attacking all of Palestine, which is what
we were telling you. Now if you wanna
pretend they're all Hamas, then you're, first of
all, an idiot. And secondly, the idea is
that anything under that Hamas rule that The
U that the Israeli government forced into reality
after 02/2006. Now look, if you wanna pretend
they voted, they didn't, and that somehow makes
sense to you, good luck with that. They
were telling you they're terrorists their whole lives,
but now we're gonna let them vote and
let them pick that. Like, you would let
the groups that you call terrorists vote for
I mean, it doesn't make any sense. But
fine. Let's pretend like they voted them in.
Okay. 02/2006, they voted them in.
And then they challenge it. They said, we
don't agree with that. Okay. So then there's
no democracy in the first place if you
get to pick, choose what they the bottom
line is Hamas being the element that was
in control, whether or not they were voted
in, became the government. So that means you
get a library card. Anything overlapping with the
government structure is gonna be somehow connected back
to it. Now all this time goes by,
a whole different conversation. To argue then suddenly
that anybody even reconnected to that just because
that was the case that you forced in
because you funded them to keep them divided,
which I'll just grab this in case you
guys don't know that.
Even Horets put this out right after October
7. Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment
of a Palestinian state, you know, what they
kept pretending they wanted, has to support bolstering
Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. That's Horets.
K? That's Horets.
He said, this is our strategy.
02/2019.
Not hard to see, guys.
So
when he's telling you this, that means they're
targeting anybody that existed in Palestine because of
what they made the reality.
Innocent
people, change officials,
economic, government, school. They know what they're doing.
And even if you pretend they're Hamas, those
are still crimes. They're not militarized.
Now here is even BBC.
Everyone's turning. Everyone's starting to call this out,
which I will accept, but I'm never gonna
pretend like they didn't blindly support genocide for
a year and still probably do if it
suits their interest.
First thing to say about this is that
it's absolutely
shameful
that
the only story we have about Gaza
on tomorrow's front pages is about pro Gaza
protests in The UK.
We have a few days ago an Israeli
parliamentarian
said,
on Israeli media,
he said,
we can do what we want. I'm paraphrasing.
Nobody cares. We can kill a hundred,
Palestinians in Gaza
over one night, which has been happening with
frequency, and nobody cares anymore. The world will
just let us do it. And it seems
that our media
are determined to prove him right because for
weeks now, that is exactly what we've had.
We've had a UK.
I mean, imagine that statement and not changing
the entire conversation.
Now look, I'll be the first to say
that because idiots like Lindsey Graham say something
lunacy,
doesn't mean that everyone thinks that. But it
still matters that a member of congress said
that. So if you have these people over
here going, look. We can murder who we
want. And then you see them murdering who
they want, and that doesn't change the conversation,
there's nothing left to see there. You know
what's happening. They're supporting that outcome.
Whether left or right, that's the reality.
Surgeon
who's working out of the hospital in Gaza,
he's been giving interviews
and saying,
this is what it's like. It's a hundred
killed one night, a 50 killed another night,
seventy
seventy five another night. He says, this is
a slaughterhouse.
Yep. This is like being in a slaughterhouse.
We have seen the Israeli government
absolutely
say the quiet part out loud. The Yeah.
If only people had listened to when we
were screaming that.
Octo you know, a month after the start
of October 7, the week of six months.
Or how about
ten years before this started? You know, when
pea when when people like Robert
were screaming about what they were doing. You
see, the craziness is that why suddenly they
think it's so now we're good. I'm glad
they're pointing it out, but this is so
it's not new,
and you can prove it if you just
care to look.
What they're doing is ethnic cleansing in Gaza,
and we are not covering it. It is
not on the front pages
of our newspapers, and that in itself is
a disgrace, and that is what allows it
to keep going on. Okay. I mean, there
have been statements, strongest straight statements ever from
Keir Starmer and other European leaders, obviously. Statements,
but not action. Israel doesn't care about statements.
The Israeli government, which is the most extreme
government that Israel has ever had, and is
saying out loud, we're going to corral
Palestinians in Gaza basically into a concentration camp
in a little bit of the strip, and
we're gonna Even use the word concentration. Like,
we're gonna concentrate them into this area. That
was Smotrich. That wasn't by accident. Take over
the rest.
And his starving and slaughtering people on a
daily basis, it does not care
that Canada, France, and The UK says, well,
if you carry on doing this, we're gonna
do something terrible. We need to be actually
taking action now, today.
Action that Israel will be forced, compelled to
listen to and stop. Everything else is meaningless
and is allowing this to continue. We haven't
seen
Now interestingly, someone in the chat points this
out, pulled the strings. He and this is
important to understand about the voting overlap. They
says only and I can't confirm the exact
numbers, but the point is the same. He
says only 12% of Gazans could have voted
for Hamas as 50% of the population are
children, and 25% of that were children when
Hamas was voted in, and Hamas only won
with 51 actually, it wasn't 51%. I think
it was four it was a plurality. It
wasn't a majority. So nonetheless, the point is
that you can't pretend that even today that
they all voted for him because that's not
the truth.
Let alone the fact that, like I said,
I don't even buy that at the end
of the day. But it's just everywhere you
look, this stuff is out there.
Stuff like this. As Glenn Greenwald points out,
day after day for nineteen months and with
no end in sight,
Entire families extinguished.
Small children blown to bits by the thousands.
This one is from an airstrike on the
home of two married physicians who work at
one of Gaza's last functional hospitals, all paid
for by The United States.
Nine siblings
under 12 years old
killed by an Israeli strike on their home
in Gaza. Why? Because they're medical, because they're
working on people and saving lives, so they
target their homes. This is what happens to
people that help Palestinians. That's the message. You
think The US cares? No. They're gonna give
them more money.
This is what the current administration is supporting,
just like the one before it did. Regardless
of the narrative,
ongoing
makes me sick.
They were the children of two doctors who
work at the Nasir Hospital in Khan Yunus.
One son survived but was critically wounded. Witness
said the children's mother collapsed upon seeing their
bodies brought into the hospital where she works.
You you you wanna you wanna have a
a horrible night? Read the comments.
Read what some of these absolute monsters are
saying and laughing and cheering. Look at their
Twitter feeds. Look at their Instagrams as they
laugh about. That's what you get. F for,
you know, f around and find out. That's
the kind of stuff you get right now.
Frances Albanese from the UN writes, two doctors
go to work to assist others. Nine of
their children are killed by an Israeli missile
targeting their home. Only surviving child is in
critical condition. Targeting families
in the still standing buildings,
distinguishable,
sadistic pattern of the new phase of the
genocide.
Now, of course, what you get from the
propagandists out there fighting to support the, you
know, current administration or whatever the game is,
what, you know, left and right. Here's Fox.
Israeli intel
so right there, you understand. That's where you
should understand something's going. Israeli says, okay. What
are they getting at? Indicates Hamas held hostages
at New Gaza Hospital. Oh, great. So you're
using two in one. They're using human shields,
which then just gets allows you to do
whatever you want even though no one's ever
proven that and you can, in fact, prove
it's not happening right now if it ever
did. That's straight up the facts, especially for
you even I mean, whether you went or
not or anybody else, you're gonna show me
one example from October 7 forward where you
can prove it's happening. I'll give you a
hundred dollars. Not some broken narrative of what
Israel says or some fog, foggy video. You
know, the same at the at the same
time,
I can't even I've I've lost count. What
is it? Nine, ten examples where you've caught
them on video since October 7 using Palestinian
human shields and examples of the of this
mosquito protocol or the other the neighbor procedure.
These are their terms.
It's just it's just, you know, it's I
I get some you get these moments in
the show where I'm like, why am I
talking about this? Everyone either knows this or
is pretending it's not the case and doesn't
care. That's how I feel about it because
it's so obvious.
So Fox News, Israel says they were using
human shields, and it was the hospital. Okay.
We all good?
That's why they killed that's why they bombed
those children, bombed the hospital because they were
you well, guess what? They're lying to you,
just like they always are. Here's even the
Associated Press.
Generally, not about that one example, but generally,
Israel use of human shields in Gaza was
systematic.
Soldiers and former detainees all tell the Associated
Press. This is not new information. I've made
this clip. I've played a million times. I'll
play a little part of it. This goes
back as far as you wanna look. 02/2013.
Palestinian children
tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a nine
year old, as human shields avoid jail.
On and on and on. It cites the
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International. Yeah. But but
we're all gonna debate this as we scream
what? Like everything else. They're raping, torture dungeons.
No. Oh, you mean all the things you're
approvingly doing, and now we can prove that
even that the rape and everything else didn't
happen?
And yet we still have to go through
this process? And I'm not gonna say we
should suddenly start believing everything they say about
them or denying what they claim. But if
you've got an evidence, a track record of
lying
consistently,
every time getting caught so maybe we start
asking maybe they're lying about this. Maybe that
behooves us to consider that possibility. I included
the clip down there for yourself. Here's even
CNN for crying out loud. This is from
October
2024.
The Israeli military has used Palestinians as human
shields in Gaza, says former same thing.
Here's Niva Fray
stepping in
with some logic for you.
First of all,
let's listen to what
Vaughn here had to say. Forgot to grab
this.
So I'm not sure what I think of.
I'm I'm not too familiar with his work
quite frankly, but, you know, one of these
came kind of, you know, kind of exploded
on the scene and they you know, I
think I you know, people like this have
a tendency to be taken advantage of by
people in this, you know, just trying to
get to the truth and people draw you
know, you come in with, like, a Tucker
overlap, whatever that they feel they can listen
to and, you know, they get taken advantage
of. Like, whether Ian Carroll, which by the
way, what even what happened to that guy?
So here's what Vaughn had to put out.
And my point is he came out and
he said, what are we doing? Right? Like,
he's called good for him for coming out
whether it's a year later or not and
calling this out. First, watch this.
You know, I wanted to say something. There's
been something that's just been kind of on
my heart, and so I feel like I
I should bring it up.
There is
you know, we've had people on the podcast
in the past to talk about it.
And there's just a
there's a conflict that's had been happening in
The Middle East. People know about it,
between Israel and Palestine and some of the
areas over there, the Gaza area they talk
about.
And,
Look. If you guys know is if you
have you know, reach out. Tell him I'd
like to join and have a conversation about
this so we can actually get some, you
know but, I mean, he I think he's
had some guests on. They know what they're
talking about about this, you know, but
this is this is a reason
that TLAB more than you know, along a
lot of people like us in the field
that are objective and nonpartisan
don't get boxed out of anything because we
come with the real with, you know, the
the provable source material about the facts that
challenge both sides of the paradigm. Nobody wants
that in the you know, even, like, even
the people that are not part of the
mainstream, in many ways, have strings connected back
to some mainstream apparatus, whether funding, whether platform.
And so all those things get pulled. And
you guys know this. You're part of this
community. We get boxed out from everything for
a very clear reason. But reach out, see
if it'll happen.
And I just think it's it feels to
me
I don't know if I it just it
feels to me like it's a genocide that's
happening while we're alive here in front of
our And so he struggled with this clearly.
Right? Because I feel like so this my
personal instinct, you guys can decide, tell him
what you think.
And, again, I'm not too familiar with the
work. I haven't see I don't even think
I've even seen a full show. But the
point is my gut tells me that he
was struggling with this. Right? That he didn't
wanna say it because I think he knew
it would hurt him, that people would attack
him for it, but he did anyway. Now
and, regardless, I think that's like I said,
he wasn't opportunism or just that he really
cares. It's worth leaning into because that we
need more people willing to put out a
large platform that
I mean, have you heard have you seen
all any others of these major Republican sides
that are somewhat flirting with the truth? Have
they said genocide?
Because it is, guys. It's a genocide. It's
one of the most obvious you've ever seen
in your life.
In front of our lives.
And I I don't
sometimes I feel like I should say something.
I'm not
a geologist or geographer or anything like that,
you know, so I don't know
a lot of
the
some of it I do know though. Like,
I know the basics of the issues over
there, but for me, it's just like how
I feel like you see all these photos
of,
people,
just children, women, people,
body parts, just
yeah. I mean, you get it. You get
it. I mean, you know, and he's, you
know, he meant geology. I I imagine, you
know, he's struggling, you know, clearly. But the
the point
is that he called it out.
Put himself out there to call this out.
I think that's commendable.
And he simply said, what are we doing?
Here's what Viva Fray had to say.
It is human to feel sad at the
consequences of war.
Wakerynger. My god. But the first thing you
need to do is define what genocide means.
Then you need to ask yourself if genocide,
in quotes, starts by the purported victims of
the genocide, slaughtering over a thousand innocent men,
women, and Trump. You see where this goes?
My
god. Slaughtered over a thousand innocent men, women,
and children, most of which were IDF, by
the way, who grew reportedly committing this genocide,
most of which, by the way, were killed
by the IDF. But, of course, those facts
don't matter for the lawyer here. Does slaughtering
over a thousand people in villages and attending
a peace concert a peace concert? It was
a rave, first of all. And there's so
many other points about this, about how it
was moved, about I mean,
how they were then used by human shields.
We could see on video by the IDF
shooting at the other people
everywhere.
So many of these things they're just ignoring
or don't care about or lying about.
Is the murder of over a thousand people
genocide? Like, what does any of this have
to do with the fact that you can
clearly objectively look at what they're doing and
recognize from a moral perspective that it's wrong,
But you're trying to nuance this with the
foul look. But they look. Look. Even if
everything you're saying is true,
you're gonna talk down Lee Lee Yvonne from
recognizing that now it is regardless of how
it started, that it's wrong objectively?
It's just gross what he's doing right here
in every possible way. He goes,
is the murder of over a thousand people
genocide? If not, why not? Well, first of
all, because you know the answer, because it
does not meet the metrics of legally defined
genocide. This one does in every possible way.
I'm sure he's somehow working into calling South
Africa genocide. I don't know. I don't follow
his work in that way, but maybe he
seems pretty partisan to me. The point is
right now the argument is that that was
a genocide even though it doesn't meet the
metrics, but this one does, but that one's
not. It's just dumb what's going on right
now. He says, if it is, did did
you call that one out at that time?
That's not a valid argument. That is a
nonstarter for me. It just because you didn't
call maybe you didn't see it. Maybe you
didn't care. Does that have any effect on
whether you still think this one is or
you could call it that because it objectively
is?
Just because you feel the need to say
something doesn't mean you should say it until
you fully considered, oh, thank you. What's his
name?
Gosh. What's that that guy's name? Just,
Murray. Thank you, Douglas Murray.
Have you been?
This this is this is the guy you're
talking to. It is is this kidnapping, rape,
and slaughter, see where we're going, of a
thousand people qualifies an act of genocide in
your view, so you ended with calling them
out? No. First of all, rape did not
happen. That's been proven 45 times over from
the UN, from the people that were there.
It didn't happen.
Now in regard to the evidence we have,
to make it as clear as possible, what
you can prove is that they were raping
people in their prisons, Israel, that they were
actively doing there's a rampant problem going on,
but this is what we end up with.
Or the slaughter of a thousand people, how
about we recognize things like the Hannibal directive
that even Gallantus now admitted, the colonels have
admitted that they've ordered in multiple locations, not
just looked like, but they ordered the Hannibal
directive, which means they killed their own people.
These are all facts, guys.
Insane to me. And so
Marcus says the IDF killing 50,000 plus Palestinians,
including over 14,000 children, is not a proportional
response to October 7. Are you insane?
Here's what he says. So you're suggesting their
proportional response is that Israel should go and
murder and rape a thousand plus? See, he's
lost in that argument or doesn't care about
the truth.
To say that that they they should respond
by doing the thing that didn't happen in
the first place, their atrocity prop did you
miss the babies on a clothesline, the 40
beheaded babies, the babies in an oven, the
gutting of the woman, all of which were
proven to have been manufactured to create people
like you.
Do you want to pick the Palestinians who
get murdered and raped, Marcus?
What are you talking about?
You seem to have the answers proportional. Right?
He's simply pointing out that what you're saying
is insane. They've gone so far over the
top to even even if you claim a
thousand is what happened.
Look at what they're doing right now, and
your response is to chastise Vaughn for saying
that?
I just I I can't read this person
anymore. I used to think he was somewhat
intelligent, but I don't no idea what's going
on here.
A rape for a rape, a murder for
a murder? That's not even remotely what he
was saying. You're being so disingenuous about this,
or maybe you're just not as smart as
I thought you were. As I have said
before, he says, I don't agree with Israel's
response. Oh, very brave of you. But I
can identify a stupid argument when I see
one. I just I'm I'm just it's sad.
Makes me sad because people listen to this
person.
Too bad. Well, here's somebody you should be
paying attention to. Dan Cohen says, another former
captive, another one in a long string of
them, an active duty soldier, by the way,
somebody he would call hostage, I'm sure, not
hostage is the point, IDF member, meaning you
are not a hostage, you're a detainee,
says Israeli bombings were the greatest danger to
her life in Gaza, and she was nearly
killed when an airstrike partially collapsed the house
she was in.
How many times I think at least four
examples we have of these people saying that
the member of Hamas shielded their body
with their own body to protect them.
Look it up. It's not hard to see.
These are all facts at this point. Israel
and The US still maintain the farce that
the military pressure, a a euphemism for mass
murder, compels Hamas to release captives.
Over
and over.
Or just again, the Hannibal directive.
This is an important show.
The undeniable reality of October 7 foreknowledge, the
foreknowledge as well, and the Hannibal directive.
And people just don't care. They don't want
to see it. Here's what Caitlin said.
Anyone who says Gaza will be at peace
if Hamas just surrenders and releases the hostages
is either knowingly sowing disinformation
or ignorantly sowing misinformation.
We need to make sure everyone's clear on
this. So no one can say that they
don't know after history unpacks this one, which
they all will. Just like that, the the
phrase out there will say, oh, well, you
know, like, try to frame it as somehow
being on one side or the other like
a, you know, any number of people in
the past where they always come out and
act like it was somehow hard to tell
or we listen to the right sources. Always.
Netanyahu has made it completely and unambiguously
clear that even if Hamas surrendered today, and
I've said this a hundred times over, more
than Netanyahu, by the way, they all have,
many of them, that even if they surrender
today and released every single hostage, Trump's ethnic
cleansing plan will still need to be implemented
as a precondition
for ending the mass slaughter.
It's all very public, and yet we get
the arguments from people that either, again, like
she said, don't know or are lying about
it. She says, to be absolutely % clear,
Trump's plan for Gaza is that all Palestinians
be removed
on a permanent basis, never allowed to return,
which is a textbook crime.
There is no way to permanently remove all
Palestinians from a Palestinian territory
without material
coercion,
meaning more mass scale violence and siege warfare.
This is also no way to argue. There
is also no way to argue that this
mass displacement would be voluntary since Israel has
been deliberately and systematically making the Gaza Strip
uninhabitable
by destroying civilian infrastructure. That's why the guy
goes, it's a war zone. Yeah. You don't
get to manufacture the reason that you say
they have to go for moral reasons.
Forcing them to choose between starvation and an
in uninhabitable
wasteland or submit to ethnic cleansing is exactly
the same as forcing them out at gunpoint.
It was obvious that this was Israel's plan
for Gaza in October 2023 as we many
of us were calling out. Plan they even
had actual plans, guys.
Plans to move the civilian population out of
the enclave were already being circulated within days
of the onslaught, but that wasn't Israel's official
and openly stated policy until Trump's administration.
Now that Israel was clearly and explicitly stating
this agenda in public, there's absolutely no excuse
for anyone to continue circulating the lie that
the suffering of the people of Gaza ends
if Hamas surrenders. They're still saying that. People
like
I always forget his name now.
You know, the big lumbering idiot that's in
congress. You know? He
Says that all the time. Just surrender Reese.
I mean, they remember that big moment where
they or the big talking point that was,
release the hostages, end the war.
That's never been true. From day one, they
told you that, just like she's highlighting.
What happens
what happens is that their homeland will be
permanently taken away from them as they are
shipped off to a foreign land, and Gaza
will cease to exist as a palletian territory.
Now
who's the I don't I the idea of
whether they're shipped off to some, like, new
settlement
is completely up for debate. I'm starting to
feel like this will end up them being
in some kind of prison camp. That's what
it feels like to me. Because they're overlapping
this with the immigration and deportation point using
the same locations. These people are not going
to some camp. They're going to prison.
That's not peace, she writes. Or if it
is, it's not the peace of an empty
room. Or it's if if she's or if
it is, it's the peace of an empty
room, the peace of a room full of
corpses. Saying you made peace by removing the
Palestinians from Palestine is like saying you settled
an argument by decapitating one of the arguers.
That's the only peace the people of Palestine
will experience if Hamas lays down its arms,
losing everything they've ever known forever on pain
of death.
That is the inconvenient truth people are trying
to hide when they say, This all ends
when the mosque surrenders and releases the hostages.
That is the deception they are sowing. And
she literally cites exactly what they're saying, pointing
to their own statements.
That doesn't matter, apparently.
Lastly,
just wanna reiterate this.
Because I understand this, like I said before.
Craig Murray says this,
that he supports this. I, personally, I support
military intervention to entirely and permanently abolish the
apartheid state of Israel.
Now this is a dangerous thing. Again, like,
I I really think it's important to highlight
that I completely
get this.
Maybe that's the only way this ends. And
my point is if the only objective, which
it seems like it should be in this
case, is to stop these people from being
annihilated,
that may be what it doesn't seem like
they care about anything else. My problem is
that that suit their interests. I almost feel
like that's gonna be what they lean into
because the US government, maybe through NATO or
something else, will argue that they're doing it
for humanitarian reasons. It'll be spun into some
kind of partisan. The Republican
MAGA team's gonna roll it into some kind
of we're saving it like we promised. We
told you. Promises kept. Whatever.
It'll be occupation. It'll probably end up being
that Hamas fought them, and so we had
to fight back. I mean, who knows? It's
obvious where it might go. The end game,
destruction.
End permanent occupation for Israel and The United
States like we always told you was coming,
and they'll then say that you asked for
that.
Now I'm not saying I have an alternative,
because trust me, I get it. I just
don't think that any of these people should
be involved. If you're gonna do something like
that,
there needs to be a different dynamic.
You know, how that plays out, and it
can't involve the parties like US, Israel, the
West at all, it seems. But it's just
it's just dangerous to see where it goes.
And I feel like any way you go
at this point, they're gonna try to abuse
it for their benefit.
So I don't think they should be involved
at all.
So
I just hope people can
find
the willingness,
the courage,
discernment,
right, to to to point out what this
is,
to highlight the reality, not based on what
narrative one side or other is saying, but
like we just showed you, what they're what
they're pointing to. This is what they said
they were gonna do. Here's the evidence of
their settlements in the places they claim they
don't wanna occupy. They it's all right there.
We need to recognize the Palestinian people are
the focal point of all of this, and
they're using them left and right.
But at the end of the day, as
long as you're willing to stand up and
call this out and fight for the people
that deserve it, right, the the what's correct,
the moral principle, like, from your perspective. We
can disagree on that. That's the reality is
you're never gonna agree with everybody out there.
But from your perspective out there listening,
fight for what you believe in, your principles,
your integrity
with
sound with, you know, with with clarity. Like,
don't be bound by some kind of an
argument that someone else tells you aligns with
what you think you want. You know what
you want. You know what feels right. And
I believe that most of you out there
are good people.
Otherwise, they wouldn't pretend to be.
So just don't be swayed into something that
feels wrong because of partisanship.
It's everywhere.
I believe in you guys.
So believe in us.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure of the hospital has
been destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were a hundred and
seven patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last forty eight hours there.
Bodies have been discovered
in the last twelve to twenty four hours
with who have been handcuffed with their arms
behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor? By the
Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October.
Over four hundred and fifty health care workers
have been
killed. Friends of mine that I have worked
with over the years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I I can bear witness from
this from my time at Alexa Hospital and
from talking to people that there's been direct
targeting of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your
belief? Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital? Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never witnessed any
Hamas militants in the hospitals they have worked
in. When were you in Gaza?
End Of April for the first couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the
disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, thirty years,
ground zero,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my first week in Gaza. And
when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority, or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of eight year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings destroyed.
You're not real.
What? You are?
Is any of it real?
I mean, look at this.
Look at it.
A world built on fantasy. Synthetic emotions in
the form of pills. Psychological
warfare in the the form of advertising. Mind
altering chemicals in the form
of food. Brainwashing seminars in the form of
media. Isolated bubbles in the form of social
networks.
Real?
You wanna talk about reality?
We haven't lived in anything remotely close to
it since the turn of the century. We
turned it off, forgot the batteries, snacked on
a bag of GMOs while we tossed the
remnants in the ever expanding
dumpster
up the human kingdom.
Branded houses, trademarked by corporations
built on bipolar numbers, jumping up and down
on digital displays,
hypnotizing us into the biggest slumber mankind has
ever seen. You have to dig pretty deep,
kiddo,
before you can find anything where you live
in a kingdom
of