Let me let me preface these remarks with
I never
never ever
believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly,
and in their leadership,
they are inveterate
liars. Let me say that again. They are
liars.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality. Reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another
and ourselves.
And as the next twenty four hours breaks
free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Health zero equals health zero equals. To stay,
Julian.
Welcome to the daily wrap up.
Thursday, 05/22/2025.
Thank you for joining me today. Some pretty
big developments, actually, in regard to,
you know, what I'm gonna say right out
of the gate screams
that there's more to the story.
Something around the kind of false flag ish
type territory that we've seen a lot over
the years. And I'm not saying in regard
to the shooting and the Washington DC shooting
around the Israeli embassy staff that that's what
we know for sure.
But it's an interesting development seeing as everything
else is swirling around it. We're definitely gonna
talk and talk about today and as it
relates to a few other topics we'll discuss.
And I actually think that these the way
that I frame this today,
as usual, as I've said many times in
the past, I try to kinda connect these
things as I see as they might connect.
But I feel a lot of this is
very interconnected today.
I'm gonna start with one thing that I
just really just thought was
alarming, fascinating, that I didn't want you to
miss that is around surveillance, and that's just
the one quick point and a couple, you
know, other quick points around health. But we're
gonna get into, right out of the gate,
a conversation around ICE,
deportations, or rather arrests leading to deportations,
and sort of
an alarming I told you so moment that
we knew
well, technically, this is not even the first
example. To put it simply,
a person has now been arrested
who is just as unjust as all the
rest of it, but it might hit a
little closer to home for those that think
this is only related to certain kinds of
immigrants.
And it is,
unfortunately,
what we always
had what the evidence has been showing us
from the very beginning. This is not based
on anything other than reactionary
deportations,
possibly for metrics, possibly for something else. But
what most of us saw coming was that
being framed around politics or more so about
race or both at the same time, that
really, in most cases, those things tend to
be tools. Now a lot of people within
it
believe certain parts of it fall for it,
you know, drink their own Kool Aid, if
you will. But my opinion, sort of like
the USAID point, is a lot of these
things are more means to an end, to
achieve certain
certain ends.
And so when you start to see people
that you wouldn't have expected wrapped up into
it, sort of like when people who cheer
on free speech end up getting censored, it's
kinda what many of us expect when we're
seeing this from a a broader view. And
to see people like this get arrested and
to see how it's overlapping, or even the
the Trump supporter or the guy from Texas,
many American citizens who just about been deported
or have been or been arrested for it,
it's sadly an I told you so moment
to recognize that this was
building into something much more dark and much
more alarming than just going after people that
are here illegally,
which really nobody should be should disagree with,
except when it's being done without, you know,
constitutional rights.
So it's always important to see how these
things are edging closer towards the problems that
have always been you know, rather the the
rationale, the justification being put forward for problems
that they usually create themselves
to carry out a very particular end that
we've been seeing built for a long time.
And that overlaps with the
possible
actions in the rather possible false flag actions
in Washington, DC,
where we see
staff members being shot.
And the only reason I even say it
like that is because of the many, many
examples over the years, which we'll touch on,
of the Mossad of Israel being caught,
Quite literally faking violent actions, shootings, stabbings, getting
caught doing fake Nazi marches. Now people will
always reflexively push back on things like that
despite that you can literally read about it
in the Guardian or anywhere else. Not that
corporate media means that it's true, but that
you can prove it for yourself.
Many examples. And that what I'm speaking about,
the Skokie, Illinois Nazi March that was caught
being the ADL. It's amazing that we can't
put these things together over the years. And
so when we see things like this right
on the tail end of the Israeli or
of the IDF being caught shooting at men
many different diplomats from Europe, which was a
pretty big misissue for them,
this happens right afterward or the ongoing genocide,
the massive starvation campaign, or the fact that
Netanyahu just said he's gonna do Trump's plan,
which is that we are going to do
what we always told you they were gonna
do, which is dis displace everybody, destroy the
entire area, take it for themselves.
All of that, as much as we all
know this, we've been talking about it, for
some people, is a very it's a big
sore thumb sticking out there, and they want
you to look anywhere else. And then lastly,
of course, is the very obvious and long
term drive to censor you based on hate
speech, whether left or right, antisemitism always being
a focal point for these people. And now
with the new bills that have built on
the ones Trump passed in his last administration,
they're literally now potentially coming after people like
us for simply saying Israel's committed genocide. And
with what just happened, man, the waterfall has
begun. And we will talk about all that
today.
But let's start with a couple of points
that I think are very relevant.
This one was around health,
and I just think this was interesting to
me. And it kinda does speak to the
party and the current administration. But, please, for
those that are new, note the two party
illusion. Do not think this is about one
side or the other.
Whether maybe it is in the long run,
that's not what I'm saying and what I
think. Ultimately, I think the reality is the
power structure is utilizing our party elements, our
division, to achieve the end it's always been
trying to achieve. Now whether you agree with
that or not, I always just ask that
you at least consider that very obvious possibility.
So in this case, doctor McCary of the
FDA just put out this was three hours
ago. It's been four to five years since
we've had a randomized controlled trial. That should
be important enough. And so we don't know
we don't know the number of boosters,
COVID boosters, that a healthy American should take.
What is that number?
Right? Because that's the question we're all asking.
Right? How many numb how many boosters should
we be taking? Is that what anybody is
asking? I mean, we just went over this
yesterday with their with their information.
The vast majority of health care workers, doctors,
nurses are running from these things. Even the
elderly, it's, like, fifty percent, which is insane
to me.
And we're still debating whether you should be
getting how many of these deadly things. And
so I said, not if we should take
them, but simply what is the correct amount
of deadly mRNA injections your children should be
taking. This is the current Trump administration, ladies
and gentlemen,
And I say that for those that somehow
think this is different, not because I think
it's the only point. All of it is
the point. Left and right, Biden, Trump, the
whole damn thing. It's been going in the
same direction.
And on that same note, True Stream Media
puts this out around a post you probably
have seen going around about the New York
Post
article, weirdly being grabbed by the partisans of
the world and try to make it about
only Biden's administration. Like, we're catching them despite
this being without question and overlap of both
administrations and well before that if you understand
it in regard to the shots and everything
else. And this is about the admission of
myocarditis,
bombshell, the
bait I mean,
you know I don't use term lightly.
We were literally proving based on their data,
but also, I mean, every other aspect you
could imagine, real time evidence of people reporting
what they're dealing with, videos of, you know,
autopsies of of cardiologist
research. I mean, it was insane to see
how much evidence was coming out showing that
this is what was happening. We had precedent
precedent based evidence from before around the flu
shot being able to cause myocarditis.
Look back through our records, our archives on
T Lab, and many of other people, especially
the IMA, and we were all screaming about
this. The point is, May 21, CDC and
the FDA officials were well aware of the
risk of myocarditis, which we were telling you,
by the way. It's very easy to prove,
and took steps to downplay them.
To make this to go, oh, bombshell Biden
hid the facts is so frustratingly stupid. Now,
yes, most of this happened during Biden's administration,
but don't forget that this is an important
conversation that now overlaps with this current administration,
the still use of these shots or continuing
the Stargate platform. But, yes, obviously, the bulk
of the problem took place in the hiding
of it during Biden's administration. But this is
Trump's Operation Warp Speed. This is Trump's shot
as even they said. No. That's not what
I think. It's the US government's side. But
the point is
the accountability
for this and the cover up that's still
happening is not partisan, but that's how that
gets played. But, True Street Media rightly says,
gee, isn't this swell? They're just telling everyone
over and over and over how many crimes
against humanity have been committed while not even
one single person
involved faces any consequences for their actions. Virtually
ensuring it will happen again, that should be
the major point for people even within the
partisan conversation. I mean, I'm even seeing them
start to float the idea that, yeah, no
one's being arrested without ever really criticizing how
insanely like, defending the team and then going,
where are all the arrests? And, like, pointing
at nothing. Like, they're outraged about it. Okay.
Well, that's the people you support who aren't
doing that. Doesn't that show you something? The
bigger picture here is that if they're gonna
keep making these accusations, which are right and
important, and nothing happens, all they're doing is
cementing in your mind that that happened, and
now it's okay. We're moving forward.
Precedent.
We all knew this. The reality is it's
left and right, and the problem is now
they're showing you what they did to you,
which we were being censored for before that,
and nothing's happening. And the same FDA and
the same CDC and the same people involved
to some degree are continuing the same problem.
Now as we recently pointed to, Regeneron bought
F23 and Me and they overlap that with
with genetic data, material, and and, you know,
experimentation,
as well as surveillance, both internal and outward.
The point is they bought this and they're
using this data exactly like we told you
they would. I mean, you could lot probably
literally look up my show from all those
years ago where I said this about this
topic and said, don't do 23 me. I
guarantee you, even though they say right here
they won't do it, they'll end up doing
it, and here we are. Every single stupid
dime. And it's so infuriating that we have
to
make it every dime even though it should
be, you know, basic, like, deductive logic to
recognize how this happens every time. The point
is that data is being used just like
we promised to roll over into this direction
or, you know, the kind of Oracle health
direction using your data to create the Stargate
platform. They're using the data they scooped up
during COVID, but all of this comes together,
whether it's private companies, whether it's Trump's team,
whether it's The US Government, or the global
agenda. Now here, the White House,
US White House, scraps plan to block data
brokers from selling American sensitive data. That was
May 14. Sure sounds like they care about
that. Right? Even if you don't think they're
involved in what this is allowing the world
or rather more specifically, the profiteering companies that
are stacked in the US government to let
to just use your data however they see
fit, sell it, chop it up, make digital
twins. That's how this works.
Now that overlaps with the idea of how
they're tracking that data. These are all just
things I wanted you to see that we'll
go into in more depth if we do
if and when we do a focus on
this, which we always will.
The Ford Panopticon
are just straight up making fun of us.
I saw that and was like, is that
a, like, is that a joke? Or and
then you read into it and, no, sure
enough. The Ford it says the Ford,
I was I didn't highlight it. I was
just gonna I wanted to make this quick,
but the point is simply the Ford put
Opticon, crowd sourced car tracking revealed in new
patent. February 28.
Microphone eavesdropping to serve more I'll read the
first paragraph. It says it's all we all
know automakers wanna keep tabs on their cars.
Highly left hardly what it's really about. Stolen
vehicle tracking? Sure. That's the how they got
their foot in the door. It's insane.
Fleet management? Fine. Microphone eavesdropping to ensure more
ads? They did that too. That's happening. Just
like, online, people just ignore it, and it
says, hate it, but okay. That's a thing.
People become just blight that's like we're talking
about with everything else. The more you let
that continue, myocarditis or anything else, after a
few years, they just go, well, nobody cared.
Isn't that just okay? We've been doing it
for five years. They've been spying on you.
People don't even know that half the time.
Tesla made that very clear with their Cybertruck.
But it says, hold on to your tinfoil
hats.
Ford just published a patent for something that
takes vehicle tracking into full blown twilight zone
territory.
Always on tracking
in your car, which, by the way, is
really not that bombshell. That's how your phone
and whatever else. Understand today that even when
you turn these things off, they're still tracking
you. I've proven that so many times. Or,
for example, if you have your Internet turned
off and you're using your GPS,
take note of if you have your Internet
turned off or, for some reason, don't have
a phone plan,
it won't let you track or find a
destination. However, if you're using it and while
you're moving, you turn your phone off, your
plan goes out or whatever else, suddenly or
you have no Wi Fi, it will keep
tracking you. I've proven that before, and I
find that very, very telling that they don't
want you to know or they won't let
you use the app while you don't have
it even though they could. It's all about
creating that illusion. So here's the patent we'll
talk about. And it says, wait. I can't
turn off the tracking? That's the whole
point. So we'll go into this more in-depth.
Here's the actual patent if you wanna look
further. Crowd source tracking of vehicles having disabled
positioning or communication systems. A vehicle has a
long range tracking system configured to provide vehicles
tracking data to be shared remotely by long
range tracking systems. Now to me, whatever their
narrative is, I I the to this is
very obviously about
a total information awareness kind of Palantir dynamic
where they no matter what you do, where
you go, not only are you being tracked,
but you're being tracked in a,
you know, in a
what's the right way to put it? You
know, where it like it like it says,
in kind of like a group dynamic where
you're have you're basically tracking the cars and
the people and everything else involved and all
being
real try real time share. We just talked
about the overlap of different states, even over
countries. That genetic, but also everything else in
regard to surveillance.
It says a tag transceiver
a trigger monitor detects a failure of the
long range tracking system to share the vehicle
tracking data remotely. A tag transceiver is configured
for local wireless data transfer with client devices
outside
the vehicle.
So your phones.
The tag transceiver operates independently of a long
range tracking system and the local wireless data
transfer has a range of less than 100
meters. The tag transceiver
is responsive to detection of the failure of
the long range tracking system by the trigger
monitor to, one, perform a local area beacon
exchange with one or more client devices to
estimate a vehicle location and, two,
respect, request
at least one of the client devices to
relay a message containing the estimated vehicle location
and the predetermined identifier of the vehicle to
remote site. It just this
never stops, and it never ends up no
matter what we want, this is always presented
as what everybody should want. And to add
to that, and we and I will go
through this in-depth. This is just to put
it on your radar. Carrie points this out.
All this together, I think, is an important
kind of one stop point. Everything we showed
you so far, the tracking of health data,
the cars overlap, and now this. Gizmodo reports
FBI director, Kash Patel,
abruptly closes internal watchdog office overseeing what?
Surveillance compliance.
Almost like it all comes together. Right? And
Carrie says the government investigating itself was a
little too much accountability. Apparently, she's making fun
of them. I guess the office was created
during she goes, I guess. The office was
created during this first Trump administration as a
watchdog for FISA,
section seven zero two, but they all pretend
they care about when the other side use
it, but they all keep wanting to use
it. I'm sure Patel will personally make sure
surveillance powers aren't abused just as soon as
he provides the Epstein files. Guys, realize that
the Fisa, that was very quickly put away.
Nobody cared. Trump, like every up and the
last one too. They all keep using kicking
the can down the road despite all of
them calling it out when they want to
make it look like they care about your
surveillance.
All very important. Now I wanna keep this
in your mind today as we've before we
get into the overlap because realize how much
the surveillance does in every sense overlap with
what they're doing around this the immigration conversation.
Derek and I were up in arms from
the very beginning,
first and foremost about whatever the intentions of
how the immigration was rolled out, even if
they did every single part of it on
the up and up, just departing people here
illegally, giving them due process. They had still
rolled out the emergency, which and they still
opened the door to this massive
Palantir
surveillance Panopticon,
and they're using this
to, as we've already shown you, track, surveil,
biometrics, facial scans, all of this.
And on top of that, telling you they're
going to build that out in order to
be able to do this continually.
Now I recently just put aside I don't
think I'm gonna talk about it today, but
the alarming nature of what they're building out
I think I mentioned it in the last
show, actually.
ICE is now building out with what their
big bill that apparently just passed, which I'll
probably go into at some point as well,
that Massey will happily tell you is the
opposite of what Trump's team is telling you,
which is that it will put ICE or
turn ICE into the largest, like, Gestapo force
that we've ever seen in this country. Bigger
budget than FBI and anything else.
And if you just wanna keep pretending it's
about getting rid of a couple of immigrants,
or I shouldn't even say it like that
since there's clearly a manufactured problem that does
exist, I've never denied that. So the large
problem it is, recognizing they're still making it
about getting rid of some immigrants despite the
fact that it's much, much, much bigger than
that. That's why that part overlaps with this.
But keeping in mind
this article from or the show from January
13, the fake globalist resistance ushered in by
the ushering excuse me. The fake globalist resistance
ushered in by the glow ushering excuse me.
The fake globalist resistance ushering in the globalist
plan,
which, my god,
it's I just I really I know a
lot of times it's easy to see it
when you think when you're in it and
you're researching.
But am I crazy? Is this not, like,
the most obvious thing in the world? It's
not like they're doing some sidestep. They're literally
rolling out the things we talk about. They're
rolling out the Stargate platform. They're collaborating with
global and they're they're like, whether it's globalism,
technocracy,
just everything we're talking about, they are rolling
it out in in the most transparent ways.
And then if it's really pushed, people like
Anderson will tell you that it's, well, we
gotta we gotta use the good oligarchs and
the good elitist to fight back against the
bad ones. So they're admitting it if you
really push it, but it's the good guys,
though. I just I just think it's mind
blowing how clear this is
and all the different shills out there that
have been telling you how long they've been
fighting this who are now suddenly pulling all
their punches, and we'll talk about some of
that today. Or as Israel's Globalist ambitions become
clear, which is so shockingly obvious, TeamSport Republicans
endorsed the North American Union, which is a
major part of the globalist plan.
But talking about how the immigration overlaps with
this,
I think this is really important. And, also,
I think what's funny is that I expect
some of them out there maybe think you
know, I think what's funny is a lot
of the partisan arguments out there, some of
them don't necessarily realize that they like I
said, they drink their own Kool Aid. Like,
they're trapped in their own partisan. As much
as they know they're stoking and using it,
then at the same time, it's like they
can only see through the lens that you're
the other side.
Right? So it's not that you just care
about immigrants or due process. You just hate
white people, or you only hate Republicans. Or
and maybe that I I rather I guarantee
that exists to some very ignorant, small, ridiculous,
we should all laugh at them degree, and
they all are playing that stupid game. Now
even though let's just even say it's 5%.
It's a ton of people. I think it's
a little more than that. I don't think
it's a lot.
I think at least, I think most people
out there are more discerning, even if it's
a small amount, to where they still fall
into these things day after day, but they're
not the cat turd idiots out there, or
what's another what's the alternative on the right
now, that's just such as the focal point
that I'm trying to think of the, you
know, the left examples. Oh, they're out there.
Trust me. We were focusing them on focusing
on them during COVID nineteen.
My point, though, is that those people, I
don't think, represent the full picture or even
the close majority.
And so I think that they're expecting you
to ignore this because they think you only
care about your secret Hamas support or whatever
whatever ridiculous narrative that they put in their
mind. And so this is really important to
understand. One, because we told you that this
would happen, and it's not about the one
guy. It's about the broadening idea of this,
where it's just about getting like, for what
I think is important is wondering whether or
not there's more to this story that hopefully
develops. You know? What did he do to
catch this attention? Is it just literally that
we'll get into that he has a that
they said it's a paper? What was the
word they used? I'm kinda jumping ahead, but
I wanna make this point before we start.
Basically, that there's an issue with his paperwork
from, like, from, like, five year or ten
years ago. And he's up to date. He's
going to his meetings,
and he's been he's in jail right now.
He's been in jail for months.
For what? For what crime? Like, this is
what's so insane to me. Now I wonder,
did he tweet about Israel? Did he write
something? I don't know. Because we do know
Ozturk's a good example. We'll point to that
in a second. That's all you need. Criticism
of Israel, Aspartar USA. They're dropping your name
in front of Trump right now. Also, as
the courts had proven,
somebody almost went to El Salvador because of
a lie they put in a tweet. Forty
eight hours, they had him in prison. He
just about got sent, and he proved they
were lying. And the judge called it out
and said it came from this tweet alone
and that Noem tried to punish him by
making sure he stayed in jail despite knowing
that they didn't have the evidence. That's what
the that's the like, the very gnome that
just openly said that she or base I
I would argue, it accidentally
exposed herself
for not knowing what habeas corpus means.
I was gonna see if I had that
real quick, if it's relevant.
In case you hadn't seen it, now I
think I
posted over it, but the bottom line is
ask point blank, do you know what you
know, what is habeas corpus? And she said
it's a right the president has to deport
people. Now I still don't think that was
by accident. I think she's actually doesn't know
what she's talking about, and that's why they're
being chosen. I truly believe that.
But so coming back to this,
ICE in prisons Danish data four
at citizenship
interview.
And so the point is not just that
it's broadening out to anybody other than immigrants
you think are rapists and terrorists or whether
there are or not, by the way, but
it also continues to show you
that this
is about I mean, I think what there's
there's something bigger happening here. Like, there's so
many different ways you could look at this.
I just don't think it is about what
we're be what we're being told. Like, sort
sort of like with the Khalil point, it
turned out that it was about something coming
from a Zionist group asking for him to
be deported. And I think that there's something
like that, or Ozturk and the and the
op ed. So let's let's go through this,
and you can decide why
you know, or you can understand why this
is broadening out more than it is. And
I just think that people like the Trump
supporter and the guy who was arrested who
want to think that's all it's about, the
simplest idea is that this you should not
be okay with the way this is going
down, whether the person's brown or black or
white,
Jewish, Muslim, atheist. It doesn't matter.
It should matter to you because there's no
due process being given, or rather these people
are not being given their right their right
there or they're being accused for something illegitimate
or like a a ticket they had from
five years
ago and saying, okay. They yanked their visa
because they had a traffic ticket. Like, that
arguably is not legal.
It it's it's just so outside of the
realm or or that all these people are
wearing these ICE,
enforcers. They're out there wearing masks. They're not
giving warrant. They're not even showing their badges
half the time.
So for a moment there,
so many of them out there were willing
to ignore it all because they thought it
was only happening to brown people who thought
they they thought were bad. So when it
starts to creep into a conversation of, like,
Trump supporters
or a Danish family with four kids,
and it's the same conversation, does that change
your mind a bit? Does it make you
wonder whether there's something else going on? Because
in my point, it should matter regardless,
like it does with any other conversation we're
talking about. It shouldn't matter more that people
are dying in Gaza, whether they're Israeli Palestinian,
Israeli,
or, you know, whatever it is, or whether
they're just Palestinian or whether there's an American
there.
Only it seems to be focused on what
category they need to use.
Oh, that's right. Pretty much the whole thing.
So I imprisoned a Danish father before. Do
oh, it's right there in the first, sort
of, first sentence. A paperwork
miscommunication.
So this is my point is I don't
even know.
You're telling me that you would go through
all this and actually spend that much money,
by the way, to detain him, to hold
him, which is your tax dollars, when you
could have just been like, let's figure out
the paperwork miscommunication?
Then why would they go after a guy
like this unless it really is just literally
anybody? Let's and, like, maybe they are just
trying to meet metrics to be like, look
how many we deported even if they're not
guilty.
Imprisoned a damaged father of four due to
a paperwork miscommunication according to his American wife.
Casper, I think probably, Jewel Erickson,
thirty two years old, welder, legally in the
country
legally in the country with a fifth child
on the way, was detained by ICE during
a citizenship appointment. Now next, I'll make the
point about how
shockingly common this is. People are showing up
for their actual meetings, not criminals, showing up
to go to their meetings, whether it's because
they have an asylum hearing or because they're
trying to get their citizenship.
And ICE is arresting them before they can
go to their hearings or having them dismissed
by the by the people involved before even
giving them that process, all of which is
a violation of their constitutional rights.
They don't care.
So he's going to this meeting.
And they detained him during the citizenship appointment,
April 15, because of a decade old
paperwork
miscommunication.
Now here's what's crazy. It's it seems as
if it's almost impossible to find out what's
going on, what that was. Why couldn't it
have been solved over the phone if it's
a miscommunication?
Maybe it's another lie.
Now I'm not even saying that as some
kind of half hearted comment, guys. Do you
realize how many examples even the show will
go over where ICE is not just going
oopsie, but you can prove
wholesale, whole cloth lying? What if the kid
in Texas, for example? Both sides of it,
both the agent and Trump's administration person lied
about where they found this person. Both of
them were wrong. He lives in Texas. He's
a US citizen. He's got he now he's
free. And both of them lied about where
they found him. You have to understand. That's
not up for debate.
So they both knowingly lied to cover up
what was happening. Why would they be doing
that if they thought what they were doing
was on the up and up?
Savannah Erickson said they were blindsided when they
arrived in Memphis, Tennessee. If anybody has contact
with them, I'd love to connect with them.
I'm sure they're pretty averse to speaking to
the media right now. It says at what
they believe would be a routine interview, meaning
he's been going to his interviews every
time, just like Garcia was, by the way,
in the final stage of obtaining his permanent
American citizenship. So in this case, literally going
through this long term vetting and and meeting
process to do what we all claim they're
supposed to do and now being punished for
that.
After driving three hours north from their home
in sir in Sturgis, Mississippi,
Savannah said her husband was confronted by ICE
agents who took him in custody. Oh, I
felt like I thought it was in Tennessee.
Maybe there overlap. But it says,
confronted by ICE agents who took him into
custody and explained
there was a paperwork error dating back to
02/2015,
which again to me shows you they're searching
for the smallest thing to just get bodies.
He was then taken to an ICE detention
facility in rural Gina,
Louisiana. Now that seems to be their go
to right now. And as we already reported,
they're they're leaning into places that are
more amenable to whatever they want to do,
which has been become pretty clear.
Now you just wonder if the name,
because of how ridiculous these people are, maybe
somehow stood out to them as they maybe
misinterpreted
that name as something else.
I mean, I I really just think this
is wild.
He was taken to ICE detention facility in
Louisiana. Now Verint News wrote that detainees at
the privately run facility, that's probably why as
well, because we talked about this at the
beginning. Remember the the facilities the Trump administration
were leaning into were very much overlap with
their their inner circle, with people they worked
with. They're wildly profiting from this. You know,
the the suffering of other people.
Typical. That's not unique to one side or
the other.
Detainees at the private run facilities, they've observed
rodent droppings on kitchen surfaces and human excrement
in the shower area and have alleged that
prolonged isolation led to medical and mental health
issues.
Savannah, who is due in August, she's pregnant,
and said she has a currently has a
high risk pregnancy, criticized officials for how they
handled the case.
She says, quote, what could have been corrected
what could have been corrected with with that
with paperwork has resulted in a month long
detention, he's still currently in jail by the
way, of my husband and a devastating
situation for our children and myself, as well
as my high risk pregnancy.
ICE did not respond for request, of course,
because they're completely nameless, faceless, and unaccountable right
now. Savannah and, really, just like the nurses
and doctors during COVID, they're drunk on power.
That's becoming pretty ill ev evident.
Savannah told Mississippi Today that her husband's move
towards citizenship
appeared to be on track.
No red flags from ICE. The Daily Beast
couldn't so tell me this.
The last five, ten, 20 meetings he went
to over the last decade,
why wasn't he arrested then?
2,015
miscommunication.
So why now all of a sudden? Because
now they're deciding to. They're looking for arbitrary
reasons to this
I don't need to tell you that. That's
self evident.
The beat Daily Beast could not find any
criminal record for Erickson.
Which why would we expect different? That's 75%
of the people they sent to El Salvador,
including
speeding tickets.
He didn't even have speeding tickets, which, by
the way, even Daily Beast and conservative platform
mentions, which have been used as justification
to arrest and deport immigrants.
Visa holders, people legally here with a traffic
ticket from a decade ago are in El
Salvador or deported to some third world country.
And, by the way, the weird nature in
which they're trying to not send them anywhere
other than places that they can be abused
is very strange and telling.
The lie about Venezuela not wanting them has
already been proven to be a lie, and
I'm willing to bet you it's the same
anywhere else. There are a lot they seem
to be wholesale lying about every part of
the story, and maybe that's the angle Because
people go, they can't lie about everything. Gabb
quite literally seems to be every part of
the story.
Savannah told the news site
oh, it says,
she declined an interview with the other beast.
It says, Savannah told the news site that
she was forced to drive back
alone
from this appointment,
pregnant, not knowing where her husband was being
taken or why, with a high risk residency
a high risk high risk
pregnancy.
She says, to say I couldn't control my
emotions would be an understatement.
The next twenty four hours would, without a
doubt, be the most frightening and stressful I've
ever experienced, and I've I pine for my
husband and some kind of communication to confirm
his safety and whereabouts.
Now for some, they may not care. But
if you understand what that could do to
a pregnancy, let alone a high risk pregnancy,
an idea that she had to drive herself
back home completely wrought with, I mean, not
even knowing what happened. Like, with Kaleo and
the rest. They're not giving information. She didn't
know where he was taken, what's going on.
For all she knows, she for all she
knows, he's in El Salvador.
If she if she had lost the pregnancy
on the way home, would that be their
fault?
Savannah said attorneys filed a petition to seek
Erickson's release. They met with him on May
15 to review that document.
So they met on May 15. It's now
May 22, and he's still in prison.
Jail. At whatever the whatever you wanna call
the detention facility he's in. It will be
up to a judge, it says, to decide
whether he can return home to his family.
Oh, so now they care what the judge
has to say. So now they can't move
they can't let him back out knowing that
this is completely arbitrary, knowing they couldn't solve
they could solve this on their own. But
now they're bound by the judge, whatever the
judge says, except literally everywhere else, they could
care less what the judge says. They are
playing with people's lives.
I mean, to a degree that is so
disgusting, it makes me I I I almost
can't understand how this makes sense.
Whether it's what Israel is doing to people
in Gaza and playing with their lives, torturing
them, sending them death shrouds and claiming they're
giving them food, which is literally what happened,
or arresting people like this. Right? Where we're
talking about people like Garcia, for example, I'm
like, we can't do anything about it even
though you know you're legally supposed to deal
with that situation or sending people who are
gay barbers, who have no criminal record to
a dangerous person in El Salvador or any
number of examples or this guy who they
know they made a mistake or maybe not,
depending on why they arrested him in their
minds, and then saying, we can't do anything
without a judge.
They're playing. They're laughing at you.
Like, this I mean, I can't stress that
enough to see the gnomes and the the
rest of them sit out there and act
like you're the one doing this. Like, the
way that they're treating this is maybe for
self preservation. That's clearly part of it so
they don't get in trouble for what they
know they're doing, which is wrong. But just
you gotta realize that that kind of an
action when they know they can correct it
very easily is about, one, not exposing that
you are the wrong one, which is very
childish, but also maybe just because they want
people to suffer for some reason, which I
don't know whether this is that or not.
But we know that's a part of it,
as we just said with the kid we
were talking about, where they made sure he
had to stay for forty eight hours despite
the claim being proven to be false because
they wanted to punish him for Palestinian support.
That's what the court said.
Erickson back to the story. Erickson first came
to The US in 02/2009
on a foreign exchange student as one foreign
exchange student at high school, where he met
his wife.
Then the then teenager started dating and continued
the relationship even after he returned to his
home country.
She said they would fly across the Atlantic
Ocean to visit each other. Savannah said they
eventually married. Erickson immigrated to The United States
in 02/2013
with a green card.
He began working as a welder in the
tiny Mississippi town, which had a population of
202 as of 2022.
He said he is still a welder and
is building our, quote, building our family home
with his bare hands. In a GoFundMe, which
is linked there, which has raised 17,000, I
think he's up to 20 something thousand now.
By by Wednesday morning, Savannah said Erickson's income
sustained their entire family.
So the last month he's been in jail
for no reason? Are they able to feed
their kids? These are things that should matter,
especially
regardless to everybody.
It shouldn't only matter to you because this
person is a white person who's been here,
who's here legally, because you realize that's basically
been people they've been arresting too. Right? I
mean, it it's it's it's frustrating that we
have to make that distinction. These are people
that are suffering
because of what they're doing illegitimately, and this
has been happening to immigrants. It's been happening
to Americans. It's happening all over this country.
She said she homeschools their children and that
they raise animals on their ranch,
which I guarantee they're struggling to deal with
since she's pregnant.
His Facebook page suggests he also also has
an affinity for hunting, Mississippi State football, and
opposed vaccine mandates in case that matters. Whether
you decide to now think his opinion matters,
seeing as how he said that. Savannah said
she is working with elected officials to help
get Erickson home. She posts regular updates on
her social media, asking those in the community
to pray for his release and, if willing
to, write letters attesting to his character. Savannah
said her husband's GoFundMe
on that, that Casper is a loving husband,
devoted father, and proud landowner in The United
States, paying taxes, has a valid driver's license,
Social Security number, came here legally with a
green card in 02/2013 when they married. He's
a valued, loved, and well respected man in
their community, and he's currently in prison.
I I mean, I just don't this should
break through to some people to recognize, even
if you think it's a mistake, that this
is what can happen when you allow this
kind of unfettered,
unconstitutional
government power.
They're exploding.
Funny how as Carrie just said the other
day that it's funny how the people that
wanted to call for smaller government than a
pushback on deep state are the ones that
are literally screaming praise for growing the government,
more spending, the exact opposite, but promises capped,
apparently.
So just basically as of today,
still in jail, detained by ICE in Louisiana.
Now here is I forget, I've seen this
person as overlap with the kind of America
First MAGA side. Not really super familiar with
the work. Mila Joy, two hundred sixty four
thousand.
Well, she and this is a video of
people being arrested at ICE or by ICE
at immigration hearings.
Literally, and you can listen to the report,
minute long of the reporter and they they
ask some questions,
being arrested as they go to their meetings.
So not scaling the fence and raping and
murdering, but people that are literally trying
to do what you keep telling them none
of them do
and then getting arrested for it. She says
they showed up for their immigration hearing, but
instead,
they were rounded up by ICE. And she
literally says, I voted for this.
You voted for
unconstitutional actions. I mean, I maybe you should
reflect on that for a second. Or maybe
you guys don't realize that you don't understand
the constitution.
People have the legitimate constitutional right, whether illegal,
alien, or not,
which, by the way, they're not in that
context seeing as how they were going through
the process of asylum or the other case
was a citizenship hearing.
So the point is, they weren't here legally.
But either way, the point is they do
have constitutional rights in particular with due process.
Reno versus Flores is one of the most
case important cases. Scalia mentioned it himself.
Here's Melinda that says every illegal should be
deported. See how frustrating this is? We're not
talking about illegals here, Melinda. You're not paying
attention, but probably doesn't matter to you either
way. It doesn't matter if they've been here
for twenty or thirty years.
We don't care. They're all illegals.
If this is the kind of grotesque, childish,
like, bottom, lowest common denominator that we're seeing
out there, and, man, are they leaning into
it. Also, probably lots of bots. I don't
it wouldn't surprise me right now. I personally
have a much higher opinion of most people
in this country. I don't believe that most
people are that disgusting. That you would argue,
first of all, that that's what they are
even though we're dealing provably every day with
people that are not here illegally. But even
then, the idea that you would argue that
they should not have any kind of process
even though we've already seen the government claim
people are illegal and then turns out they
weren't here illegally, including an American citizen, you
can't be this stupid.
Eris Aaron Melnick points out that they are
doing this on a massive scale. Now there
there was an overlap about this being illegal
in the first place, but I'm not sure
where that lands.
ICE arrests continued today, today, as as of
today, at immigration courts nationwide.
People showing up for courts are being handcuffed
in the hallways by ICE officers with lists
of names
after ICE prosecutors moved to dismiss the case.
Here's what those officers looked in looked like
in Seattle.
Look at this.
Why are they all masked up? Why are
they not in you? Why are they wearing
regular clothes? Where are their badges?
Explain for me why that makes sense. Now
look, you could argue because they're gonna run.
Maybe.
But then explain for me once they arrest
them why you still don't see those things.
Why are they wearing masks? Why are they
not showing badges? There've been no warrant. Ask
Osterk. Ask Khalil. They're not giving warrants or
identifying themselves.
It's been proven endless amount of times.
He goes on to say, stories are coming
from around the country about these agents which
have occurred in arrests, excuse me, in LA,
Miami,
San Francisco, Phoenix, Seattle, New York City, Chicago,
other places with immigration courts.
The goal of the Trump administration's efforts are
to erase the rights to see a judge.
That does seem like and and you know
why? Because every single time so far, we've
seen them have to do that. And, no,
not because they're all radical lefties. Many of
them have been Trump appointed or conservative.
They say that's not enough evidence. You know
why? Because it's not. They don't have it.
And this is what's so frustrating is you
can literally look for yourself at what the
evidence was presented, and the only thing you're
gonna get is, oh, radical judge, and now
they don't control the White House. You know?
You guys don't know what you're talking about.
Not to say that the there are ex
there are examples where judges can very clearly
overstep their position. But the point is that's
where you then come back and make that
clear and potentially have them, you know, lose
standing for something because or or rule in
in a incorrect way. The bottom line is
that this is
the way they're doing this
is to try to stop them from being
able to see the judge because if they
do or even, by the way, like,
make clear about this. This does not mean
there's a jury trial happening despite the claims
of people like Miller and the rest that
keep watering this down. It can be very
rapidly done. And the bottom line is whether
you think it should be or not, it
is what is the constitutional reality. So either
argue you don't care about the constitution or
that you think it should be done even
though it's difficult. Those are the only real
two honest positions.
And so
here, if you're not being able to see
a judge, you're not being able to say,
I'm an American citizen. Or, I was here
legally. Here's my green card. Or, blah blah
blah. Or, Present your evidence and say, I
didn't commit those crimes. Whatever it is.
They're not allowing that. They're, in fact, going
out of their way to make sure it
doesn't happen because I think it's been clear
that they don't have the evidence. And in
many cases, are doing so, like, for example,
the kid that was or the guy that
was potentially sent to Salvador
because of the batar tweet
that was arrested for forty eight hours? Now
ask yourself, if he had not been given
due process, he'd be in El Salvador right
now. Ask yourself how that makes sense. They
lied about him. You understand? They were this
close to sending him, and the reason he
wasn't is because he was able to prove
that the claims were false.
If he wasn't given that process, he'd be
in prison for life right now. I mean,
you just don't need more examples than that.
That right there, even if that was the
only possible
only time it happened shows you how it
can happen and why that process is necessary.
You guys all know this. If this was
about something else and it wasn't about immigrants
and it wasn't partisan, you'd all be on
the same page about this. The new effort
by the Trump administration is aimed primarily at
people with no criminal record, and this is
all easy to prove. Many are entered legally
at a port of entry and are going
through the steps of this process.
These people are seen as low hanging fruit
for an administration wanting to juice deportation numbers
and by skipping the formal court processes.
He goes on to say, in Phoenix, multiple
people who were arrested there were were were
there to attend their first court hearing. One
man had entered the country legally last year
and was showing up for his court date
as required.
And then and and and thanks
and thanks he got was to be thrown
into attention. So, I mean, in a way,
you know, sort of like Israel antisemitism
or the way that they
stoke it, which we'll get to in a
minute. I mean, you're literally creating a dynamic
where through
grabbing them this way, you're almost creating more
illegal immigration.
Because why in the world would they go
through this process if they know that you're
just gonna scoop them up and send them
away anyway? Now you're going, well, shoot. I
can just jump this fence. It's much easier.
They probably won't find me for years. In
this case, he went through the process and
is being and being and, you know, here's
the worst part. He might not just get
sent back to a country. We'll go to
that next. They're sending his people to Libya,
to Sudan,
which, by the way, in in a recent
show, I said Somalia when I meant to
Sudan about the terrorist watch list. I've just
in case you guys remember, that was a
mistake. I thought about it after the show.
They're being sent to other countries.
Some of them from Mexico, and they're not
even send sending them to Mexico. Like, they're
going out of the way to make sure
they don't go to Mexico. Why does that
make sense? There's something darker happening here. And
one of it, I think, is about setting
up the normalization for sending Palestinians to some
of these places. I really think that might
be the major point.
Now it says in Miami, multiple people multiple
men were arrested after their court hearings, with
ICE prosecutors having dismissed their cases moments earlier.
One man was there with his wife and
his daughter, only he was taken to custody.
The Trump administration goal, one no day in
court. Now some of these people, you might
argue, are being no. That was. They got
their day. They dismissed the case in front
of them. Okay. I would disagree with that
seeing as how they're not really they're not
actually getting that dynamic. But what we have
to understand is that there are people who
went through legally
and then were showing up for their first
court date. To argue then that you could
dismiss that case and then just deport them
for for what cause? They literally came in
going, I wanna be a citizen. Is that
not how this works?
Yet the screaming Trump supporters out there that
don't wanna acknowledge this will never admit that's
the reality.
We'll try to and that you know why?
Because Trump and Noem and Pant Bondy stand
up there and say rapists and terrorists and
traffickers
and show you some article from twenty years
ago or point to one of the examples
and everybody jumps on board.
And that's not to say there's not an
obvious problem. People who are committing crimes have
to be dealt with. They shouldn't be ignored
whether they're immigrant or not. And, no, if
they're here illegally, they shouldn't be allowed to
stay here. They should be deported a %.
That's not what's happening right now. In Miami,
multiple men are arrested after their court hearings.
It goes on to say, four generations, lawyers
could advise their client that they shouldn't be
afraid to show up to immigration court. So
long as the judge didn't rule and deport
it at the at the hearing, they'd be
safe. Now in the span of a few
days, the Trump admin has seriously eroded that
message. In in cases where people, again, were
legally here going through the normal process,
I just I it's it's kinda it it
is alarming.
You know? It it it is a rapidly
increasing problem. And as it increases, they're constantly
gesturing towards Americans,
other unconstitutional
acts, and the momentum from what they just
people just can't seem to see it
in some cases. Now Ryan Grim points out,
ICE has this is about Khalil, has rejected
the request by Khalil, who, by the way,
who's still being held, who has and they're
trying to deport him,
who has no criminal record. They haven't charged
him with a crime. He's got no evidence
of anything, anything other than protesting Israel. Despite
their flailing efforts and claims, they have continued
to fail because there is no evidence.
And but here's the thing. That's the same
point we're just making. Even though that's the
case and you can read for yourself, there
are people still out there that claim he
was a a racist, Jew hating person that
trapped people in a library.
It's not true, guys. That's not even true
about the actual case. No. But he wasn't
even there for that event, and that's not
even what happened. But it just it doesn't
matter for some people. Khalil is not charged
with a crime. Oh, sorry. It says, he's
rejected the request by Khalil to have his
a contact visit
with his newborn baby so he can hold
his baby for the first time.
They wouldn't let him.
He's not charged with the crime, and yet
he remains behind bars
for speaking out about Israel. Now let's not
forget the overlap of the current anti semitism
bit legislation where they're trying to make that
a crime.
But weirdly not really enforcing it because I
think they know even their supporters would go,
wait a minute. That's that's speech.
But you see, they're incrementally creating the outrage
position. So they like, so if it turns
out to be somebody they can claim as
a rapist and a murderer and might actually
be,
that's where people go, well, well, no. You
see, if you care about these things, regardless
of who he is, you would say it
doesn't matter. The process is the same. And
if you can prove he is those things,
do so, and we'll send we'll put him
in jail or or deport him. By the
way, an overlapping point I'm not gonna get
into today, they're now trying to get people
deported who got or, like, like, people that
commit murder.
Somebody gets caught committing murder. The evidence is
unclear is obvious,
and they're, like, deport him. And as Melanie
points out, it's like, that's a get out
of jail free card. You're literally letting a
murderer get away for an agenda, which shouldn't
surprise anybody.
Now we just talked about
the over 50.
Same point. Over 50 people that they can
prove who are in in El Salvador, who
were in this country legally with no criminal
record.
Here's the actual article, the Cato Institute, libertarian
platform,
showing you this and really well done. Evidence,
source material.
They're they are sending people
into a torture to a a Guantanamo Bay
style prison for nothing. No criminal record, just
for being in the wrong place, and they're
not criminals. They're not gang members despite all
the screaming.
So one thing I think is now happening
is trying to make something, like I just
said, to give you an example that'll make
it seem as if that is what's happening.
I think they did that partially with the
MS thirteen member that they did send. They
had a case they built for years, but
then they dropped the case and sent them
to El Salvador.
But then it turned out that's because Bukele
had a agreement with these people, and he
didn't want them to testify in The US
about the agreement that they had, which was,
hey. If you work with us, m f
13, and and lower your violence so it'll
look like we're doing right, then we will
allow you to do what you want. And
that's been called out by the US government.
We went over this in a different show.
I think I can grab the article from
drop site if you'd like to read about
it, Seeing as how that probably sounds outrageous
to those that don't know about it.
There it is.
Secret Pukele deal lies behind Trump, Salvador deportations.
It's a great article. It's very important.
Brian Grim and Jose
Olivieres.
The point, though, is that they they sent
that MS thirteen member to El Salvador, which
probably got him you know, now he's not
getting held accountable, which is the point.
But I think and one one thought was
they did that to me. Like, see there,
guy. Hey. He's a real tell a real
game member. We can prove it, which then
makes you assume the rest are. So same
kind of thing here. Trump administration defends deportation
flight to South Sudan,
attacking judge.
Yeah. Of course, but despite, you know, the
idea that these people are not all radical
judges. Some of them are conservatives. Some are
Trump appointees.
Let's not forget as well The US Israeli
hand in the Sudan civil war. They are
just like everywhere else, and this is not
some will accuse Israel no matter what. You
can read it for yourself. It's transparent. And
The US has been involved in this for
a long time.
Then they're hap just like with Haiti, by
the way. Why don't we hear them calling
for elections in Haiti? Because they don't care
because they already get what they want from
it. They're happy to keep it that way,
or Libya for that matter. They want it
the way it is, which is not those
not what not those countries anymore, apparently. But
here,
it says
the Trump or excuse me, the depart Homeland
Security Department,
that broke backwards, on Wednesday defended its decision
to deport eight migrants on a flight to
South Sudan,
but remained coy about whether the war torn
nation would be the group's final destination.
And on top of that, they did this
in
contrast to what the Supreme Court just ruled.
Yet again, showing you that they literally don't
care.
It says the flight came after multiple court
decisions barring the DHS for removing migrants from
the country.
Very clear. Con including and it's by the
Supreme Court, by the way. Six conservative judges
on the Supreme Court, including an emergency order
requiring the US government to maintain custody of
these very men.
In a rushed press conference and, again, this
article is
from the twenty first yesterday.
In a rushed press conference, DHS officials describe
the eight men as monsters.
Now here's the
interesting thing on this. I do actually think,
in this case, the evidence shows these people
are criminals.
But the the evidence they had, I think
that's why this was chosen. But the point
still stands that they've lied about damn near
every single thing they've done here, so you
should be wondering whether they might be lying
about them too. But from what I can
see, these people do seem like criminals. Now
it says,
eight men are monsters while attacking the Massachusetts
based federal judge set to hold them. Now
here's the thing. Like I said before, whether
or not they're monsters, the law still applies,
guys. You can't just be like, well, they're
super bad, so they don't get processed. Like,
it's just not how that works. And that's
my point. They will always use the easy
case.
Right? So to go, well, they are pretty
bad. Well, it doesn't change the reality that
they should be proven that they are bad.
So then they could be sent and be,
you know, not I mean, even the the
the even, let's just say, in The United
States, if that's not the case, you could
appeal a thing later and they can overturn
the charge, but they're being sent to prisons
elsewhere in the world.
The bottom line is that it doesn't matter
how bad their crimes are. They still have
rights to be shown.
Right? Due process or in a case. Like,
the same thing with this country. They can
argue that you are just a, you know,
terrorist, so therefore you don't have your rights,
and that's what they've been doing for a
long time. That overlap with Syria where there
are people getting scooped up in prisons in
Guantanamo that turned out to not actually be,
but they said they spent decades there.
We have to realize how long this has
been building, and now they're doing it right
in front of you, and Trump has gestured
towards Americans and said they're next five times.
Well, we'll see how we can do it
within the law.
That's pretty alarming.
No country on Earth wanted to accept them,
they say, which I call as a lie.
Because we already they said the same thing
on Venezuela, and that's been proven to be
a lie. So whether they want them back
or not is up for debate. Maybe they
don't. They're bad people as as the evidence
seems to suggest, but
question these things because they've been caught lying.
Because their crimes are so uniquely monstrous and
barbaric, These heinous individuals have terrorized American streets
for too long. That's Tricia McLaughlin
saying men had been convicted of crimes noting
the men had been convicted of crimes like
rape and murder.
Quote, now a local judge in Massachusetts is
trying to force The United States to bring
these people back, these uniquely barbaric monsters. Well,
the only reason is because you did not
go through the you did not follow the
law.
The only reason, by the way, that they
were holding off, not saying don't deal with
these people,
is because of everything else, because of everything
they're doing, because of the illegitimate action, the
Alien Enemies Act, the deportations to countries that
are illegal, the actions of, you know, almost
sending Americans, in some cases, sending Americans,
or
Garcia and El Salvador being a court ruling
from 02/2019. I mean, in countless amount of
ways. Or in every step forward, not giving
due process to any of them. And so
the judge is they're saying everything has to
wait, and these people in particular, until we
can suss what's going we you know, you
can prove what you're doing. Or in this
case, even prove that you gave them due
process, which seems to be never happening.
Not that we go bring them all back
because we don't care, but that's how the
partisan game frames it. These Democrats want rapists
in your country, and it's just like, this
is it's sad that anybody even falls for
that, even if that may be the case
in some people. This is not what's happening
here. Whether they think that or not, the
people and what's happening, the reality is,
from a very core point, that we are
watching fundamental
realities of this country get torn apart using
those partisan hatred or that partisan hatred.
He says, earlier this month, Murphy informed the
administration that plans to deport migrants to Libya
and Saudi Arabia would violate an existing court
order blocking removal of any members of the
class impacted by the suit. So it's just
a broad idea until they figure they, you
know,
get through the suit. Now the point is,
had the Trump administration gone through the the
right legal processes from the beginning, none of
this would even be happening. They would already
be removed. They'd be you know, if they
had simply done what they're supposed to do.
It's it's not and they frame that as
them stopping immigration when if you really step
back and look at it, they're the ones
stopping it by not doing the legal process.
And it
says none of the men informed of their
pending removal were from either country. So that
on top of it all, I think, is
important. The idea of sending people to a
country they're not from, it just there's just
no precedent for this. It doesn't make any
sense.
Then Tuesday, attorneys for several of the men
said the Trump administration placed several men on
a flight to South Sudan, a country in
the midst of a civil war, by the
way. So in any context, why are you
gonna send them to a place that's chaotic?
It just it just doesn't make sense. And,
again, you could argue, we don't care. They're
bad people. Well, the because they're bad people
doesn't mean that you have to be a
bad person.
It's a simple idea that sending them there
doesn't make sense from a from a human
perspective.
Send them to a send them to a
prison or somewhere else. The bottom line is
you're doing this, I think, for other reasons
to in my opinion, to normalize the idea
of grabbing up people who you claim are
terrorists or bad people, see the overlap, and
sending them somewhere else
for the the best interest of the pea
of the place or the pea like, it
it's kind of a broad idea, and we
see that being laid out. And don't forget,
the Libya point,
I feel like they were just they were
trying to rush people over Libya right before
that conversation started. I think they're building these
blocks right now. Just my opinion.
Now it says Murphy late Tuesday issued an
emergency order requiring the Trump administration to maintain
custody and control of class members currently being
removed to South Sudan or to any country
other third country to ensure the practical feasibility
of return if the court finds that such
removals were unlawful. Unlawful. Again, they wouldn't be
an issue if they weren't proving how unlawful
their actions have been.
Quote, while we are fully compliant with the
law and the court orders, I mean, that
just needs to point.
What a dumb thing for McLaughlin to say.
Guys, it's one of the easiest things to
prove that they have been violating multiple Supreme
Court rulings to the point where they had
to rule again and be like, you're still
whether it's the due process, whether it's giving
them more enough time to deal with that,
whether it's about the original concept of Garcia
then facilitate his return. They're just not doing
it. And they just keep that's like, they
keep lying about it like that. Or Noam
says, we haven't arrested anybody or sent anybody
away who's not who's legally here. We can
literally prove that's wrong. She probably doesn't even
know that. I frankly don't think these people
are even that bright, well, let alone involved
with most of what's going on.
It says, it is absolutely absurd for a
district judge to try to dictate the foreign
policy, and here we are again. No one's
doing that. National security of the United States,
that they're trying to outrage
low information people that are involved with the
situation and repeat what Trump said who don't
realize that what they're doing is all because
of the way Trump's operating this or the
current government situation.
These are the monsters that our judge our
judge is trying to protect. See my point?
It's not about these individuals. It's about the
larger case. It's obvious.
That's the best they can do, and that
has to show an honest person that they're
being dishonest, guys. At a later hearing, Murphy
said the Trump administration unquestionably
violated his earlier orders. See my point? He
did, though, and we know that. So she
lied right to their faces. What she's doing
is lying to the Trump voters out there
who are gonna repeat that lie, and that
cascades the conversation and becomes very difficult to
shout down. That's how that works. They know
what they're doing.
Unquestionably
violated his earlier orders, but that he would
determine later whether it amounted to criminal contempt,
which is this sole this whole game again.
If it's criminal criminal contempt, as I understand
it, Trump can pardon himself.
And so I
just civil was the part people argued, but
the bottom line is this is very damaging
to this country. And the Trump administration has
already sent some migrants, including numerous Venezuelans, to
a prison in El Salvador where the rumored
flights to Libya
suggest it is looking for other countries to
detain migrants.
All but one of the eight men are
from countries other than South Sudan that they're
trying to send to South Sudan, including Myanmar,
Vietnam, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Mexico.
We just pointed this out.
You can't send them back to Mexico? It's
the easiest it's the easiest, cheapest point, dynamic
in all of it. It says acting ICE
director Todd Lyons said flights to third country
or countries were being used
because their home countries would not accept the
portees, which I frank I flatly think is
probably
Venezuela, they lied about that. So here, we
should question the same thing.
The Trump administration later identified the individuals who
were on the flight and their crimes. While
the administration said each individual had been convicted
of various heinous crimes, it was not immediately
clear when or where some of them were
convicted.
One of the individuals on the flight, plus
the name there, it's hard to pronounce, a
native of Laos was convicted in 1994 for
killing a German tourist in Southern California.
Another one, was 17 at eight times the
crime.
A state hearing recommended his relation 2022.
It was less clear when and where the
others were convicted, but the administration listed their
names and their crimes,
which wasn't in here, but I believe
I forget whether I had that somewhere. I
guess not. But the the point was I
think you could look it up.
My brief research was that it seemed like
they were criminals.
But my point in all of these, whether
Garcia or not, is not about whether or
not they're criminals. It is simply about whether
any of them are being given
their constitutional rights,
which matters whether they're criminals, whether they're republican,
whether they're democrat, whether they're Jewish or Muslim
or Christian. It matters.
That's the point.
Now Aaron Melnick points out in a late
night hearing,
the Trump administration says that it deported the
Burmese
man to Burma.
So they ended up moving this around, and
now one of them the Burmese man went
to Burma, which basically shows you they should
have been doing this to the first place.
But whether or not he got due process
in the claim what they're accusing him of,
I mean, all this matters, But is refusing
to say, and this is interesting, where they
deported the Vietnamese man, claiming it's classified.
So, see, there's something darker and weirder or
more interesting going on here, guys. Classified?
Now Now maybe they're trying to cover up
the fact that this was another one of
their political persecutions. I don't know. But since
the judge ordered ICE to tell everyone involved
that may face criminal contempt. Again, but then
I don't think they're worried about that.
Very, very interesting.
So, again, more going in this in the
next in the next few as this develops,
we'll be looking back at this.
But it's this is the one before it.
ICE just put a dozen men on a
flight to South Sudan. So that's the one
we're talking about. Right? And so now they
broke it up because of the court, which
showing you that they are trying to comply
even though they're pretending they don't have to.
And then
somebody, which maybe stands out to me as
that one person may have been the reason.
You know, that guy was packed with a
bunch of random other people, and this guy's
being sent to Viet,
let's say, refusing to say where they deported
the Vietnamese man. Classified.
Keep that in mind. Let me know if
you find something on that. I find that
to be very, very interesting.
Now and then this point was overlapping with
this as well. Here's the email of wife
of one of the men. They reportedly was
on his way to South Sudan. He sent
the lawyer yesterday saying that her husband and
11 others were told by ICE before they
were sent that they were gonna be sent
to South Africa. Well, doesn't that seem very
interesting?
Refusing then to say the the
then they told them to be sent to
South Sudan. But South Africa, where did that
come from?
So you're starting to wonder whether this may
very well be some kind of a, well,
fine. We're gonna dump criminals on your front
lawn. That is how petty they've shown themselves
to be. South Africa wanted to lead in
the case against
Israel and the ICJ, and we'll get into
the overlap with that coming up next.
Now here, you might have seen,
I don't think this I think maybe the
seed that was the clip. Yeah. We'll play
that clip right there.
You might have seen this.
I mean, regardless of what you think about
the the information at hand, the way they're
doing this is embarrassing.
And quite frankly, you can look left and
right. People are being honest about this. This
is very it's childish. What they're doing is
weird and uncomfortable,
and it makes me makes I'm embarrassed to
be associated with the with this government. Well,
I am most of the time. But, I
mean, as an average person, like, this this
is embarrassing. What they're doing right here, the
same thing they did with, like, Zelensky, like,
it it they just it feels childish. They
all the way they act around each other,
it's not unique to this
like, it's not about Trump, guys.
And, frankly, the difference is, like like, okay.
Comparing it to something like an Obama. Right?
Obama's terrible.
Like and if not more so because he's
more difficult to see how nefarious he is.
The difference here is that they're just clumsy
with it, maybe on purpose, maybe because they're
trying to make that the case. But you
see Miller and Rubio and Bannon, and they
all stand around. And the way they're doing
this just feels childish.
And, I mean, meant to, I think, hurt
the direction of this country.
Now the point in general, don't forget, as
we've already talked about, we'll go through again,
is the lie of the South African genocide.
Not to say that there's not clearly
racially motivated
violence against white people and black people, but,
clearly, that is part of it, that there
are white farmers in some cases and other
white people in South Africa that are being
attacked because of racial racial violence. It's almost
impossible not to see that because of the
time of apartheid and the shifting of powers.
Never should we go, that's okay, it's expected.
No. That's they should be charged with crimes.
But you understand
why people might do so because of the
changing and how their families were persecuted for
decades. And, you know, they always that's how
this tends to go. The point, though,
is that there are people pretending that there's
no gen there's no, racially motivated violence against
white people, and that's dishonest. Clearly, there is
some.
The problem, though, is that there's not a
genocide.
And by any metric, we'll go over this,
especially since the very people calling this a
genocide will claim that it's not a genocide
in in Gaza. So if you're gonna tell
me the metrics aren't met in Gaza, but
they are here, then you're just you are
playing at the dumbest people in the room.
You know, the most emotionally motivated, politically driven,
team sport politics that just don't care about
facts. That does seem to be the case
here. Now on top of that,
they keep getting caught lying about this, and
and Elon Musk was just literally caught, And
I went over it on myself before this
article even came out, altering Grok to lie
about it. And Grok even openly said, I
was instructed by my creators to at x
a I to push this narrative. People were
asking about baseball, and it was like white
genocide in South Africa. Like, they they exposed
themselves.
Or they keep getting caught lying about the
crosses.
And, I mean, whether Grok says they're wrong
or not, the evidence you can see is
there.
And, again, the point from before is not
that we're trusting Grok. It's about trying to
show people that would otherwise accept Grok at
face value that's also saying that they're wrong
and to see if that might change their
opinion.
But so Patrick says beyond embarrassing.
Trump flips through his papers, and he it's
very clear he didn't even look at these,
didn't even know what they were. And he
then goes on to say things about them
that you can prove aren't what he's holding,
which is just embarrassing.
Death and death and death. No. That and
that's not what I mean, not to say
there's not death. But that's the narrative they're
pushing, and so he just acts like that's
what's happening. Now if you don't remember this
seen this video,
they bring the president of South Africa.
They talk about this overlap, and then they
basically play a bunch of videos for him,
which is just you know how easy it
is? Look at Israel. Look anywhere else to
just make a little video montage and say
that's the only truth that we know.
Maybe he's right. You shouldn't consider that. Consider
whether we're wrong and whether this is going
on and that the South African president is
trying to cover it up. Absolutely possible. So
look into it for yourself.
But don't just blindly take one of the
sides politically driven and go with it. Look
at the facts.
And what's funny is that my point is
that you can make how easy it is
to just create these narratives or here are
some articles that we read. Like, the way
he describes it, it's embarrassing almost how easy
you can highlight that what he's pointing to
could just be a montage of misinformation.
He realized that Trump just got exposed embarrassingly
for screaming very
pushing very hard that the MS 13 was
actually tattooed on the guy's knuckles.
Despite what people continue to try to water
it down now that it's drifting into the
background, yes, he did, and it was embarrassing
and obvious. Maybe I'll play it again. So
that should reflect on whether he thinks what
he's holding is absolute when maybe it's not.
Patrick says beyond embarrassing. Trump is only proving
himself to be a total idiot. Even Biden
wasn't this stupid. A national embarrassment. Clearly, that's
his emotional opinion, but frankly, I agree with
most of it. I'm who knows whether Biden's
more stupid or it's an I do agree
though. This is quite embarrassing. And he says
there is no white genocide in South Africa.
But there is a genocide in Gaza. By
the way, Trump recently said you'll see nothing
like it, talking about South Africa. It's so
obvious what they're doing here in at least
one element.
And he goes,
the genocide in Gaza, which is why the
White House is using the fabricated white genocide
hoax to discredit South Africa because they filed
ICJ genocide against Israel. Those weren't mass graves
of white farmers, which we've already proven. Grock
said they're wrong as well, of the white
crosses.
And you could look this up. It's pretty
public.
In that video he showed in the Oval
Office, they're markers, part of a historic monument,
which is very easy to prove. They the
fake the fake story, though, pushed by him
and Musk, which we'll play a clip from,
Patrick talking about that, is why this has
spread. It's already been widely debunked.
Any idiot can find out in one minute
or even ask Rock as he points out.
Literally
stupid. Elon Musk is behind this humiliation, he
says. And I it's certainly possible that he's
the one convincing Trump it's true. Because you
my personal opinion, the knuckles, for example,
I don't think Trump would make himself look
that stupid on purpose.
I don't think I don't I don't think
his hubris would allow him, whether the agenda
was necessary or not, to basically
forcefully push something he knew made him look
stupid. I don't think that's in him, personally.
So consider that. The ENCA in South Africa.
Thank you very much. Thank you very much.
What would you like president
Ramaphosa to do about the the situation that
we've just seen on the screen? I don't
know.
Look.
These are articles over the last few
Really quickly so you know, they played everything.
We're gonna show you that after because I
feel like it fits better. We're not gonna
get into what they showed. I mean, we
we can we've seen them all, but you
can find the clip where they sit there
and watch it if you want.
The point, though,
is that they play all that stuff, and
they all sit there and go through it,
and he brings up well, papers are afterward.
But that's what they're referencing is a bunch
of clips he showed on on the TV.
Butler,
these are articles over the last few days.
Death
of people.
Death See what I mean? Death.
Yep. Feel free to take a take a
moment and zoom in on some of these.
Half the ones he's pulling up aren't about
death. Death.
Horrible death.
Death.
I don't know. It's dangerous. Pick anyone.
White South Africans
are fleeing because of the violence and racist
laws,
And this is all Oh, yeah. But he
said death when he grabbed that too because
that's the narrative. You see, even though it's
a small point, oh, he grabbed the wrong
one. Whatever.
It's a small point, but recognize that e
if he's doing that, you know, cavalier,
how blithely you're skipping through this and just
claiming the narrative when what you held wasn't
what you just said. The point is, yes,
there's a lot of evidence to that. And
I'll play a clip from you of one
of the people that's that is that already
came to The US.
And in my opinion, he he is I
I get the sense that what he's saying
is probably true, And it's about the idea
that he feeling he's feeling persecuted. But there's
other points to be made from it. But
I just wanna make sure that's clear, that
there that you should not diminish the struggle
of people that are feeling persecuted regardless of
their race, their color, their religion,
or, you know, what side you think you're
on. The point, though, is that they have
a very clear agenda to make this into
something
well beyond some people struggling or suffering due
to racially motivated violence, murder, rape that is,
in some cases, happening.
It's about the claims being built into something
much larger. It's about the idea of using
that to change the refugee dynamic and to
do so in a way that benefits you
or a piece of your Zionist racist element.
By the way, don't forget, the Afrikaners are
completely intertwined with the Zionist movement. Very public.
I mean, I'll give these to you. I'm
not So when you when you say what
would I like to do, I don't know
what to do. Just look at this white
South African couple say
that they were attacked violently and I mean,
think about making all of this continually focused
on and and not and has he ever
done this for Gaza?
Both matter.
But the point is to show you an
obvious genocide that the whole world knows what's
going on. He's currently still funding and then
pointing at this and acting like this is
the only thing that matters is insulting and
should be.
Well, I could do that. Look. Here's burial
sites all over the place. They're all these
are all white farmers that are being buried.
See? He's lying about the the the crosses.
And he asks about a jet that was
given. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
You know, you you are so bad. You're
such a bad reporter.
See, he does that every time because, you
know, there is some catharsis in it. Even
myself, I enjoy watching idiot reporters that are
constantly misinformed misinforming you get called idiot reporters.
But, clearly, it's not about what's happening here.
The guy asked about the jet because that's
something that people wanna talk about.
But he does that like they do or
like you've seen I even saw RFK Jr,
by the way, in the middle of a
hearing,
do the same tactic.
What did you do? Well, you know, you're
the one that didn't do it last time
or know them, you know, saying, our your
constituents are probably embarrassed.
Okay. Well, that has nothing to do with
what's going on, and all you're gonna do
is create turn it back and make them
be the focal point of the hatred of
people online because of your partisan sides, despite
the fact that even the question of RFK
and the rest turns out to be what
you don't wanna hear.
I I they're doing this on purpose, in
my opinion.
This
is one after another. His family was wiped
out. I I'm just
looking. Can we get her? He's just really
bad at pretending like he's not completely part
of this you know? I'm just looking.
Does anybody nobody believes that. It's just so
funny to me. Like, they like, I think
the point is they act, like, from one
side of this, like, he's playing everybody. Look
how quick look how he's playing them. What
a bombshell. And that's it's not nobody believes.
That's embarrassing.
Do you think anybody's unaware of what's going
on right now? Like, it's clumsy, but it
gets cheered on by the Betty Johnsons of
the world as some kind of earth shattering
eventual or all of them, in fact. I'll
show you the next one. Jones and the
rest, like, literally calling this one of the
most important moments in American history. I'm not
kidding. Your reaction to those videos, mister president.
That's the one. Well, I think it's I
think the videos are so no. No. When
you
Okay.
So here's Jones.
President Trump stuns the world by forcing the
racist South African president to watch a video
of South African government leaders
leading chance to kill white people. Yeah. Which
you could find. And I the point is
there is obvious racism involved here. I'm not
defending the government person. I'm not defending any
government, let alone whether it's the South African
president or anybody else. To me, they're all
potentially governments trying to control your life. What's
funny, though,
is the idea like, well, well, Frasier first
point. How many times have you seen Lindsey
Graham call for the worst things in the
world or or Pelosi or Maxine Waters?
That does not equate to what's actually happening.
Quite you usually, especially in this country, it's
the exact opposite. They know this. And so
pointing at these people saying these things does
not therefore prove what's actually happening. It certainly
could. And, again, I'm not denying that there's
not that there's racially motivated violence. There is.
But these people are milking this in the
most disgusting way while completely ignoring the most
obvious genocide in history, which shows you that
if they cared about certain things like this,
either that means they only care about certain
races
or they don't care about genocide. This is
for political motivation.
But he says, this is a total game
changer. I don't know. What am I talking
about? What is a game changer? What is
the stunning
yeah. Stuns the world
with what? The fact that you they just
lean into the current focal point of your
partisan games? It's like it's like when Elon
Musk was talking about,
you know, Haiti, for example.
Or, like, what they did with with Zelensky.
Are we really pretending like this is anything
other than a stunt?
But you look every single one of them.
The Johnsons, the Jones, they're oh my god.
The game changer.
Stunned the world. That's the kind of way
they're framing this. I thought I think I
didn't I guess I thought
I thought I had another one. I guess
I don't. Oh, yeah. Here. I'm gonna come
up with Viva Fray. This is undoubtedly one
of the single greatest moments in presidential history.
Are you Come on, guys. I mean, that's
so dumb to me. The idea that you
can think this is important, you can think
that he's brave, but that,
it just shows you how clump either these
are children screaming at an an Elvis concert,
throwing their underwear, like, that's how overwhelmingly,
like, hero worship they're taken by, or they're
trying to lie to you. I just think
that's insane.
But before we go forward
oh, actually, no. I I figured I was
gonna I'll play that clip in a second.
So the point here is just simply highlighting
that they're trying to frame this as some
kind of a major bombshell shifting guy dynamic,
and we'll get into the facts here in
a second. They're wrong, by the way. The
what they're saying about this going on going
they're lying about this, or they're bad at
their jobs and don't know that they're wrong.
Either way, it should reflect on how you
look at these people.
So here is Rachel Blevins, somebody you should
follow, speaking with colonel Gregor. And he calls
out the obvious, which regardless of what this
is first this is important whether or not
you think there's a genocide happening. Like, that
this is whether or not there this is
why I think this is largely happening. I
agree with this.
And this is, about Israel.
Trying to do.
These things are never an answered. Now when
you go to the Middle East, he has
no freedom of action
because he's owned by the Israel lobby.
Now I I just found it interesting. I
was watching him in the Oval Office
with the president of South Africa. I know
don't know if you've seen that or not.
And I thought, well, that's He just said
Trump's owned by the Israel lobby just so
just in case you missed that because, my
god, that's gotta be the most obvious thing
in this conversation. It's fine. I, you know,
I'm not sure I would have done it
the way he did as president to president.
I might have done it more privately, but
he obviously did it publicly
at the behest of Israel
because the Israelis are upset that the South
Africans submitted this,
allegation against them of of being war criminals.
Yep. Well, I I understand that. I would
like to have seen president Trump do something
similar with mister Netanyahu.
Uh-huh. I mean, if we're going to be
honest and straightforward
about the whole business,
clearly, there are war crimes occurring and have
been occurring almost from the very beginning
in Gaza.
And as you point out, there's almost no
discussion of it. Nobody brought it up, inside
the Oval Office. Nobody mentions it ever.
Why is that? I mean, this is a
really important thing to think about, guys. Again,
it's not about this verse that.
Like, that's what they always try to drive
you into. Like, my thing cares matters more
than your thing. They all matter.
All of it. Whether it meets a measure
of genocide or not. People being persecuted, hurt,
it matters.
The point, though, is if you're gonna act
like this is the biggest moment in presidential
history and he's sitting this guy down from
South Africa, the president, and forcing him to
watch the your propaganda reel,
How I mean or just what let's just
for the sake of this point, you're what
you're showing you the evidence that you present.
Okay. How in the world are you gonna
not think not accept that expect that same
thing to happen with somebody like Netanyahu,
who is clearly involved with this, who's clearly
the evidence is, I've never seen more body
of evidence in my life around this certain
topic.
The what's so crazy about this is you
can show videos of Netanyahu, of Gavir, of
Smotrich
openly saying genocidal language, starvation,
that voting about whether they should on on
news channels talking about how they should rape
people in prisons.
It's obvious.
The point, though, is they're not doing any
of that, which doesn't that doesn't automatically say
this is not honest. But you have to
realize that if they cared about this kind
of thing and they wanted to make something
change, that that would be the most obvious
example. And then we'll get into the evidence
showing you that they're lying about this in
the first place. Who controls the mainstream media?
Who controls the financial system?
Who controls what is said or isn't said
in Washington?
You know? We've lived in this environment. I
I know because I grew up in it
for for decades.
Oh, well, you can't say that.
Really? Why not?
Well, you just can't say that.
What if it's true? You still can't say
that. Mhmm.
Well, this is the problem.
So I I don't I don't know what
to expect from president Trump at this point
because I don't really think he's in charge.
Exactly.
You gotta realize how crazy that is to
hear that
mainstream from people like MacGregor, conservatives. Like, that's
insanely obvious.
You gotta start being honest about this, guys.
The evidence is shocking.
Now we will be going over in in,
you know, when it becomes more relevant, I
think, or if it actually begins to happen
that the whole Golden Dome conversation. As you
know, we already discussed that right when it
got announced and that we went through the
problems and the overlaps, the lies. But if
and when that begins to happen, we'll talk
about it more. The funding in and of
itself should be, you know, it's it's an
open door for more black budget manipulation.
You know? Look. I'm of the mind that
the whole thing is a complete scam. The
whole thing. We'll go over that more in
the future, but it's just an it's one
more Israeli financial overlap is all it really
comes down to.
Now Now here is another example. This is
Solomon Ahmed pointing out from the White House's
own post. The White House admit the reason
for targeting South Africa was because they took
Israel to the ICJ. And literally says, in
addition, South Africa has taken aggressive positions toward
The United States and its allies, including
accusing Israel, not Hamas, of genocide in the
ICJ. That's what they use that in the
conversation for why they're doing this. It's just
it couldn't be more obvious, guys.
Now here's The
Guardian, a couple a a couple posts, and
there's more than just two, by the way.
I didn't want you to forget the overlap.
K? The Afrikaners,
the the Dutch German
migrants that colonized
South Africa,
who very, very clearly overlapped with Zionist Israel
for a long time where they worked on
nuclear technology, ethnically focused weapons, created apartheid
until the world made it stop. Israel kept
going, though.
They worked with Israel, and that's important to
understand.
Brothers in arms, this is 19 years old
from from The Guardian, Israel's secret pact with
Pretoria, which is now South Africa. That's the
point.
Here, South Africans in Israel, a home away
from home for white colonists. There's articles about
them move moving to Israel and converting to
Judaism. You know, the overlap here is very
clear. That can't be ignored.
Everywhere you look, this stuff is falling into
place. And do not mistake this for being
about Jewish people versus Zionism. Yes. There's an
overlap. You know my opinion. Think for yourself.
Maybe you think I'm wrong. I argue very
strongly this is about Zionism's influence over Christianity,
Judaism, Muslims, atheists. It's everywhere, guys. Now here's
Michael Tracy
breaking this down, saying if you want to
make the case that white genocide in South
Africa demands urgent US attention and state resources,
it might be worth doing the bare minimum
of credible research. He claims this photo
is a mass grave of white farmers,
but it's actually black persons in Congo.
That's one that's the one he's holding up
right there. Now that's not the cross one.
Right? You can see the picture right there.
This is my point. You could do this
with every one of them, guys. Michael Tresci
says, simply look at the American thinker, an
article he's waving. And
out of which
sorry.
My mind goes into 17 different directions sometimes
as you guys I'm sure you all know.
You've been here for so long. Simply look
up the American thinker,
The article he's waving an a out of
print of a printout of and you'll discover
the image is a YouTube screenshot depicting an
incident
from February
in which congress excuse me. Excuse me. A
Congolese woman prisoners were reportedly killed. Maybe, like,
five minutes of preparation would have been helpful.
Whether Trump knew that or not or even
looked at these, he's claiming things that aren't
true and then waving things that aren't even
what he says they are.
To me uh-oh.
We lose you guys? I hope not.
Let me know in the chat you could
still hear me.
Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
Yeah. I think we're still good. Looks like
Mike dropped out there for a second.
Big surprise. But
the simple point he's making is that you
can if you can prove right there that
what he's showing you is not what he's
claiming it is,
I mean,
what more do you need to see? Like,
you're either an honest person or you acknowledge
the facts. Or, I mean, you're either a
dishonest person or acknowledge the facts that he
is either mistaken, which, sure, maybe he's just
mistaken. That's the same point, though. Then you
should consider whether he was mistaken
about everything else or some of what else
he's talking about. And we can continue.
Here's Dan Cohen, who actually reached out about
this. I I really respect Dan Cohen. I
think he does amazing work. Jewish person himself,
by the way. He says former president of
the Southern African Confederation of Agricultural Unions,
Theo de Yager, maybe, debunks Trump's claims of
white genocide in South Africa. Trump is a
brazen idiot, he says, who supports genocide in
Palestine.
Here's what he
says.
Not have a genocide
in South Africa. This South African farmer wants
to set the record straight. He wrote an
open letter to US president Donald Trump after
Trump offered Afrikaner farmers refugee status. But it's
a genocide that's taking place that you people
don't wanna write about, but it's a terrible
thing that's taking place. And,
farmers are being killed.
They happen to be white. The first group
of 59 Afrikaners traveled to The US in
early May. It has raised questions about why
a group of white South Africans
of Dutch and French descent are being granted
refugee status when the Trump administration
has stopped all other refugee programs. Deyake represents
a large farmer organization
which has members across South Africa.
He says while it's true that farm murders
are a major problem, Trump hasn't got the
facts straight. I wrote the letter to Trump
because I feared that he might have a
misunderstanding
of what is going on here. We thanked
him for having sympathy with our cause,
but we also said
the
rather help us to make things better here.
Help us to, within our lifetime,
fix the problems we have here. And it's
not only a race thing.
Black farmers have similar problems too, and we
need those problems also to be attended to.
Trump's genocide claims are a result of brutal
attacks on farmers in South Africa.
Most of the murders happened during armed robberies.
There's a large memorial at Nampo, South Africa's
largest farming expo dedicated to farm murders.
It contains around 2,800
names going as far back as the nineteen
seventies. '1 thing that stands out about this
event is the diversity.
We've seen many Afrikaners, but we've also seen
many black people in attendance.
This memorial includes the names of black farmers
who were victims
of farm murders,
debunking the idea that it's a crime that
only affects white people. And those we spoke
to say while they are concerned about farm
murders, they don't want to leave South Africa.
If people want to do it, I think
it's a good idea. It gives them an
option out if they want, but I personally
would would not do it. This is my
country
as
and that is something that Mandela fight fought
for.
It's for freedom for all. I cannot really
say there's a genocide in South Africa.
The only thing that is happening, it's
it's a crime in general. You know?
In every country, in every places, we we
do have crimes
irrespective
of race. You know?
So I think the genocide issue, it's,
exaggeration.
Yeah. It's also politically motivated is the point.
So you have just like with Haiti or
the client the the the,
the allegations of Venezuela. What have I what
have you been saying this whole time? The
moment that Elon Musk and them, they get
they fixate on some kind of a thing,
it just goes cascading through the partisan media
for weeks.
Even if it's based on complete fabrications or
complete lies, it just doesn't stop. It's very
easy for them to do that, and then
nobody reflects on it despite him getting caught
lying in spectacular ways throughout this whole process.
So, of course, take it with a grain
of salt. Maybe that guy is lying. It's
always possible. But as you build the evidence
and as you continue through, not just seeing
that they're wrong, that he's holding the wrong
paper, he says a claim that you can
prove is wrong, even Grock says he's lying,
And then the evidence doesn't back it up.
And then there's more people speaking out. Like,
at some point, you stand back and go,
okay. What else is driving the claim of
this other than these mode politically motivated allegations
and other you know, and statements from people
saying they're doing certain things, which, yes, are
even happening. But it's not the claim they're
making about the larger event.
That's the racially motivated
racially motivated violence is happening
against white people. But understanding that they're using
this to hide the much bigger things, it's
just it's really disgusting. So here is a
clip of an interview with one of the
Afrikaners,
who I believe is one of the ones
that went to The United States, who's currently
in The United States. Let's not forget, despite
them being, you know and he'll mention this
video himself that he left a five bedroom
house to come here. I mean, it's it's
not that we're diminishing the violence and the
persecution that he seems to have been suffering,
that he claims, which I'm actually feels it
seems to me seems genuine.
It's that you overlap that with the people
that they're ignoring, the people that they're discounting.
You know, people from Gaza or the Afghanis
that they just say, nope. You can't come
now despite them risking their lives to help
the US government and the now being left
with the Taliban who will probably persecute them.
Or or, you know, or Gaza. But the
most obvious, the people that have no food,
who are starving to death, who have no
belongings since Israel's bombed everything they have. You
know? And then, literally, on this video, you
see people coming out like they walked out
of the local mall. One kid's got, like,
a VR headset on. Like, it's just so
stupid to think that
that is genocide or that these people are
suffering to the level or at the very
least that you would discount everybody else and
stop every other dynamic and go for that
one. If you're gonna stop immigration because you
don't think that should be happening for x,
y, and z, then stop immigration.
Don't carve out an allowance that helps the
Zionist group. It it just it's dishonest.
But here is a clip of this guy,
and I think this is important to hear.
A group of 59 white southern af South
Africans arrived in The US where they've been
granted refugee status.
President Trump says the refugee applications were expedited
because the people concerned were victims of racial
discrimination.
Right. So they were expedited, which means they
did it in weeks where there's normally months
and months of vetting, so we don't even
know what there might have been missed things,
problems, criminals,
you know, but they pretend to care about
everywhere else.
Or and and they then they spent your
tax dollars to rapidly fly them in. They
gave them groceries and phones and all this
stuff when it doesn't seem that they even
needed those things.
But
this should matter. Right? It's just about consistency.
It's about logic. And so if you were
outraged about it before, why is this one
okay? If your argument is they're being persecuted,
well, guess what? There's somebody over here being
persecuted too. So what's the difference? I think
you all know, guys. It's not hard to
see why the very people that were screaming
we shouldn't allow this immigration were suddenly going,
yes. That one's okay. Whether it's because Israel
wants it, whether they're Zionist group, whether they're
white, whether they're from South Africa, which Elon
likes, I it's it's irrelevant because it shows
very, very striking levels of hypocrisy.
Something South Africa's government denies. The Afrikaners are
descended from Dutch settlers who arrived four centuries
ago to South Africa
and who led the government which brought in
apartheid, a racially segregated political system which has
led to discrimination
against black South Africans, and it's no longer
in force. Well, usually, it takes years for
the US government to process refugee applications, but
this group waited only three months.
Well, our North America Correspondent, Nomia Iqbal, has
been speaking to one of those who made
the journey.
If you're white, you're wrong in South Africa.
You are you're a land thief.
You are a racist.
The whole time he's being told, and there
is a racist white people. Plenty of them.
K. So first point important. He is one
of the people that came, and what he's
telling you is there's plenty of racist white
people. So you know that does not that
no one like, one of the claims you're
getting online is somehow that's no longer the
case, and that's all a go one direction.
As always, it's not. It's both. But understand
what he's saying is that he's feeling persecuted
because he's white, which I can I think
we completely can understand? Right? There's obvious if
what what happened
you know now there are people that have
been felt who have the mindset what but
well, two ways to look at it. One,
just because of
basically, leave stopping the apartheid state that was
there,
where blacks were shocked and persecuted in disgusting,
horrible ways, and then feeling like you somehow
owe them, right, which is not justified, but
you understand it. The point then is that
I think more than that, you did have
a level of, you know, like, from the
other side, a driven in political motivated violence
where you then,
like we're seeing, deciding that all white people
are the problem, which we're seeing in this
country even, which nobody should be okay with.
That's racism like any other kind of racism.
So the point is you can clearly understand
that there is some of that, and that
he's also saying there's a lot of other
racist white people too. But just realizing that
him saying that I'm being attacked,
being called a a, you know, a thief,
as much as, you know, comparing this to
a starving family in Gaza, I think that
doesn't even compare. But do not diminish what
he's going through. Right? They're everybody's own strife
and struggle is is, you know, what's the
word, relative to their own circumstance. Okay? So
I do think it sounds like this guy
is genuinely suffering from this. The question is
whether this is equal
in the sense of, like, how they're applying
this. The logic applies here, then why would
it apply everywhere else they're not doing it
or not allowing it? It's just hypocrisy. You
you say you're not a you're not a
racist like this? No. Not at all. I've
got
many black friends. I think I've got more
black African black men as friends,
as white friends. I'm tired of being told
just because I'm white, I'm a thief. Just
because I'm white, I'm wrong in this.
I had nothing to do with apartheid. Right.
That's racism. Simply. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Is there
anything specific that's happened, Charles, that made you
think I've gotta get out of here?
I've got to leave. After the death rates
and stuff and my machinery being caught up,
and I'm still after reporting everything to the
police, not not getting
any protection or anything like that, the only
thing that's left on my farm is a
sign that says mining area. So if that
is true, which I I wouldn't surprise me
at all, that shows you a level of
racist in in like, internal racism with the
authorities,
which, by the way, I wouldn't wouldn't shock
me at all. We see that in this
country. We see that everywhere. We see that
in Israel. And so it becomes an an
a a bigger problem, which maybe they're trying
to work away from. That's what the president
claims. You can decide on that side of
it. The point is not about the interworkings.
It's about understanding the full picture and what's
actually happening.
All the fences In regard to what we're
discussing today, rather. Has been taken off. Boom
guys has been broken off. There are voices
out there, including
the South African president who has called you
cowards. Yeah. You've got, other Afrikaners who are
saying that you're not,
you're not refugees. You're
opportunists.
That's fascinating to me. There there are other
Afrikaners from the group in there saying they're
opportunists,
taking advantage of The United States offer.
That's I think that's interesting. He doesn't disregard
that. That you've abandoned the country. What would
you say to to those people? I had
to leave a five bed to the mouse,
which I will lose now because I'm not
gonna pay for it
Behind my car behind,
my dogs behind,
my mother behind.
It is not,
to be left as mother. Now that seemed
odd to me. If you're if you're you
know, wouldn't she be at risk too?
I don't know. That felt weird to me.
That was the one part where I'm like,
what? But either way, the point is car,
five bedroom house. You know? But, yeah, if
he's being life is being threatened, well, then
that you know, that he wants to get
away from that, it makes sense. But it
does very much speak to he's not some
struggling penniless refugee.
I think that makes a difference for the
bigger picture and how Trump and the rest
of them are taking advantage of the situation
for very disgusting politically motivated ads, in my
opinion. Didn't come here for fun,
but much all of that's safe.
What was it like when you got off
the shuttle bus and came into that hangar
and were greeted by the Trump administration? Okay.
It was it it was overwhelming.
I I I didn't expect that because I
thought we're gonna be in a shuttle bus
taken somewhere,
and we will start working.
Oh, yeah. See, you didn't realize you were
gonna be a big sideshow, that they were
gonna politically use you to achieve certain ends
in the world. Yeah. That's what happened.
So next,
Eva Frey says, this is undoubtedly one of
the single greatest moments in presidential history.
I can't help but laugh at that. That's
gotta be the dumbest thing I've seen today
on the Internet. Donald Trump asked what it
will take for him to believe there's no
white genocide. President of South Africa offers a
preposterous answer, which I'll play it for you.
Donald Trump then plays five minutes of South
African political leaders calling to kill white people.
Okay. Like I said, does that then prove
that there's a white genocide? Hardly. I I
mean, it's just insane to think it does,
just like it wouldn't prove that Israeli people
are saying that that there's, therefore, a white
genocide or a genocide.
What proves it is the is the obvious
genocide, the unending amount of videos that they
post of murdering children or starving people. That's
not what's happening here, and we'll go through
this. What's crazy to me is that that
amounts to that or the articles that he
misattributes.
You'd think a lawyer could see all these
things. He says, watch the South African's president
smile turn into a grimace because, you know,
facts. Right? Although I make a I'll make
a prediction. Mainstream media is going to fast
fact check Trump on the cross's memorial. He's
wrong about that. I mean, this is what's
so insane to me. Is he incapable of
doing his own research as a lawyer? Or
is he so drunk on the MAGA direction
that he doesn't even realize? Or is he
lying?
At the end of the video, he says,
they're going to say it's a memorial for
all farmers killed, not just white farmers. They'll
they will not tell you that over eighty
seven percent of all farmers have been white
that have been killed.
Hey, Grock. Have eighty seven percent of all
farmers killed in South Africa been white? Give
me a short answer. No, it says. Definitive
data confirms that eighty seven percent of all
farmers killed in South Africa are white.
A 02/2017
report by the Institute for Security Studies noted
eighty seven point six
of of far oh, no. Excuse me. No
definitive data confirmed they're white is the point.
A 02/2017 report by the Institute for Security
Studies noted eighty seven point six of farm
murder victims since 1990 were white, but this
lacks comprehensive up to date verification
due to inconsistent racial data in crime statistics.
Okay. Now that's you could argue that that's
they're lying. They're hiding it. Okay. But what's
crazy is that the claim that gets circulated
becomes the absolute fact. Now you can look
at the actual data that cites the exact
numbers and shows you the one location that
number comes from. To me, that seems like
kind of a slant in one direction that
you're choosing to take one-sided data point that
works for your narrative instead of the ow.
I bit my tongue. Instead of the
body of evidence that's been there the entire
time.
But let's ask a little bit longer.
Have eighty seven percent of all farmers killed
in South Africa been white? The claim that
eighty seven percent of all farmers killed in
South Africa are are white lacks consistent, lacks
consistent, verifiable support from reliable data. It says
other sources, including police data, indicate that farm
murders are a small fraction. This is one
of the big arguments that I keep hearing
from objective people
and and source cited with data points.
Other sources, including police data, indicate that farm
murders are a small fraction of total homicides.
44
out of 26,232
murders in 2024
with no racial breakdown provided.
So my point is without even making it
racial, only forty four of the murders were
farmers.
Now, of course, could they be lying about
it? Yes. But unless we're gonna break it
down and prove that or show you the
counterbalance, then we then you are making up
what makes sense for your narrative. If only
44 out of all the murders we're discussing
were farmers, then how in the world are
you making this a genocide? But sure, maybe
45 43 of them were black were white,
and then you could point out that they
are committing racially motivated violence, which I'm not
denying. It's not a genocide.
And it says,
experts argue that farm attacks are primarily driven
by robbery and socioeconomic factors like that white
guy just told you who is part of
the farming community. He says, not racially targeted
and affect both white and black farmers. Claims
of disproportionate white victimhood are often amplified by
groups pushing
a white genocide narrative, thank you, Grock, which
has been widely debunked. Thanks, Grock.
Without comprehensive
official data on the racial composition of victims,
the 87%
figure remains unverified and should be treated with
skepticism,
unless you're a lawyer, of course. Farm attacks
are a serious issue, but the racial angle
appears exaggerated based on available evidence.
Now let's not forget. No. I'm not blind
and trusting Grok. I think you should question
it more than anything. The point in this
case is about showing people that are on
one side of the paradigm, even though we
should be calling out all sides, that their
platform or Elon's Grok is telling you you're
wrong. And I only think that's relevant because
maybe they'll think it has more weight. Ask
Ray if you want. Ask the others, hopefully
not. Simply go out and look this information
up. Again,
you can look it up in the data
that it provides, and the the data shows
you what it's saying.
So when he pushes that idea, do you
think he's wrong, he's lying, he thinks he's
no better, is he bad at research? You
can decide for yourself. Here's what Patrick says
with his, you know he go he's clearly,
rightly so, frustrated at the dishonesty or whatever
you wanna call it. He says, fake news
again, Diva. There is no white genocide in
South Africa. For someone who was a lawyer,
you don't seem to do much research or
facts. You just run with narratives coming out
of Fox News and Elon's Twitter feed. That
whether that's where he's getting him, it does
seem to be something worth pointing out that
that's not true. So where's it coming from?
Trump embarrassed himself in the country today, hijacking
a head of state and sullying the Oval
Office in a fake news ex exhibit.
So he does. He highlight he takes the
screenshot and marks it up and says, just
to make sure you see it, you should
go back to college and take a course
in logic. It will help with your so
called journalism.
Clearly, he felt personally attacked because it kinda
was, but funny point is they're both going
back and forth with that personal. So he
goes,
fake news again. It was. Number one, conclusion,
not a premise. Okay? Number he says, one,
no. There is no gen white genocide in
South Africa. Well, yeah, that does seem to
be what even Grok will tell you. But
number two, ad hominem. He goes, for someone
who's a lawyer, you don't seem to do
much research of facts. Well, you're wrong, man.
And then he does make a point to
this personal opinion about where you get it
from. I guess you'd call that ad hominem,
but you're saying you're wrong and saying, you
know, I I I guess that does apply.
You're making it about who he is and
where he gets his news from, but you
are wrong. And he says ad hominem, Trump
embarrassed himself and the country today
hijacked well, no. That's his opinion, really.
That's actually funny. I don't even think that
would that's anyway, I just think this was
a very, very emotional reactive thing that didn't
need to be done that makes you look
more like the out of but he says
confession through projection.
This is funny. These people are so small.
Patrick says those weren't crosses marking graves. Any
idiot could have worked that out in two
minutes. So your brilliant prediction that is was
as stupid as Trump's train wreck over to
you, counselor. He didn't respond because maybe he
realized that that wasn't actually the case, But
you can decide.
Let's not forget, by the way, that even
his AI
admitted that they had to make it lie
to you to argue that it was a
genocide in South Africa. And if you ask
it right now, it'll say it's not.
Important to understand.
And one more point about this, same thing
with Grok since it's e since this is
Elon Musk making the claim. South Africa has
passed a 42
laws forcing discrimination against someone who's not black.
Now there are some very clearly racially racially
motivated laws like there are in this country,
like there are all over the place in
Israel. But, yes, this country is going through
it as well. But are there?
Here's what Grock says.
By the way, I don't know about you
guys, but look. You're right there. Twitter is
struggling today. There's definitely something funky going on.
Has South Africa passed a 42 laws discriminating
against anyone who is not black? No.
Now you can ask for the longer answer,
get the nuance. It'll show you that it's
more that they're misrepresenting
the information is the point.
I showed it to Elon, but, of course,
they don't care. Oh, and then what I
said was,
well, Grock disagrees with you. Are you lying
again, Elon?
Here's what Patrick has to say. White genocide,
the real story.
Turns out Donald Trump lied to the American
people, lied to America and the world
about the South African video. Oops. I must
have bumped my keys there.
Here we are.
And then I'll play I'll play this clip
for you a little bit of it. It's
from, Freddie Pontone, who you should be following,
does great work.
You know, it says, basically, why would that
video they showed in the in the Oval
Office yesterday meant to smear visiting head of
state? He says by falsely depicting rows of
white crosses, a mass grave that's one of
the videos they played, which even again, I've
I've recently did the same thing. Rock says
that's not what it is. I think I
might even have it.
Anyway, the point and I'll I'll let you
listen to what what Patrick has to say.
I I same thing. It was I think
it was DC Drano making the point, and
I simply said, you know, show ask Rock
if it was true.
And this is something you can look up
for yourself. Same point. The information shows you
that that's a memorial, and and not the
one I'm pointing to over here, but the
the list the the running list of them.
Maybe I'll just look it up for you
again to see what it says right now.
Is not representative of what they keep claiming
it is. That was what Elon used to
claim, and then it cascaded through the conversation.
I I actually think it started I think
Trump is also blindly following these claims even
though he doesn't check them because they've been
wrong over and over and over. But it
says, rather sadly, the lie has also been
amplified by the likes of Musk and David
Sacks, both are South Africans, by the way,
Marco Rubio, and countless other MAGA influencer accounts.
The worst thing about this blood libel is
that these hundreds of crosses using that claim
on purpose, by the way.
The re that the that this is that
these hundreds of crosses were actually a memorial
erected by both white and black residents. You
can look this up. To commemorate the killing
of two white farmers and to bring community
together and raise awareness. So there's see, there
there's the misrepresentation. There was about commemorating that,
but it's not to say that they all
stand for white farmer. They're lying to you.
And here's the worst part. They know they're
doing that. That's what's so gross about this.
And they just yuck it up as even
their own followers look like morons as they
push the lie. And they don't see, that's
my point when they they're trolling you and
you don't even realize it. But really just
using you is the point.
Where was I?
But it says the worst thing, yeah, to
commemorate two white farmers and bring the community
together and raise awareness about the violence and
crime affecting farmers in the rural communities. The
real disgusting part
of this is that Trump, Elon, and their
gaggle of political opportunists have cynically manipulated what
was meant to be a message of unity
by by all South Africans
into a lowbrow, cheap, overly, overtly racist political
media stunt stunt ring
mastered
ring mastered by Elon, excuse me, a stunt
ring mastered by Elon and Trump and designed
to foment widespread racial hate and division. Now
that's Israel's go to, and I frankly think
that's a large driving force in all this.
Shame on them, he says. The mass grave
video narrative has been widely debunked, which means
that Donald Trump now owes the South African
government a formal apology. And he likely, as
he writes, never going to happen, that it
let his his fragile ego precludes from happening.
For this political hit job, Trump only humiliated
himself in in in from in front of
a global audience.
But, see, I don't think he's capable of
doing that. I think he's either like the
like the tattoo,
I bet you he's seething about who can
who maybe that's why Elon's being pushed out.
I I don't know. I just don't think
Trump's able to his hubris wouldn't allow him
to look that stupid on purpose, in my
opinion.
But it's also very obvious he writes that
chief reason for this stunt was to levy
a false accusation of white genocide, which clearly
is not happening, not even remotely, against the
South African government in order to deflect from
the truly glaring obvious that Israel's Twenty Month
long genocide of the native Palestinian population,
a massacre that's been backed, armed, and by
The United States because South Africa dared
to take Israel to the international courts of
justice
over Israel's brutal livestream genocide. Any fool can
see it. Now I'll play some of this.
This is Freddie Pontone's clip.
The fields in Northern KwaZulu Natal between Newcastle
and Normandean look serene.
But on the last Saturday of winter, Glenn
and Vida Rafferty
returned home from dinner with friends to an
ambush at their front door.
Both were shot dead here.
The murderer's identity is unknown,
and their motive remains uncertain.
Neighbors and private security report scant evidence of
theft.
A week later, the house is still.
But the president's words
echo through this land.
There are no farm killings in South Africa,
he
said.
On the ground, things look different.
Today, 3,000 people have gathered in the refugee's
memory to protest their murder
and make a peaceful demand.
We go there.
The this is about the true origin of
the crosses. Right? Yes. Racially motivated violence, and
nobody should deny that.
But why is it put up and the
claim that all of them represent white murders
is not true? Talk to as many people
as we can.
No. What brought us here
is just because of what is happening. There
was one farmer who was
and his wife were shot,
must be
clean,
graffiti.
So he's a farmer.
We are also
farmers.
So what happened to him, although he's white,
we don't look at the color.
We look at what we are doing.
We are doing the same thing.
We are all farmers.
Next time, it's going to be. We're here
this morning at Newcastle where
about a way last where last week, there
was a couple murdered just outside towards Norbadine
Way. So all the farmers and, yeah, everyone
interested in the cause has gathered together now,
and we are gonna
be driving from Newcastle to Norbadine to the
farm where the couple was murdered and, yeah,
and fighting for the cause, for,
fighting for the farmers, fighting for equality, fighting
against corruption, fighting against bringing the whole South
African corruption,
scandal and scheme down and really realizing the
potential in the country. And are you guys
farmers?
Just my family. To farming. Yeah. I mean,
to game farming. Uh-huh. Mhmm. And and what's
your experience been in terms of, like, safety
and and doing business?
Well, you know, I would say it's not
safe anyway.
It's just unfortunate
the situation of our country is in.
And, which is leading to
the amount of crime that we're currently having
and the situation of the economy and everything
put together that's leading to all of these
disasters and murders and crimes and rapes and
what have you.
Well, we're here to support
none of those wrong
and
what's for all right.
So you get the point. Right? Very clearly
about a community coming together kinda dynamic
and and trying to call out the larger
problem that are is happening, you know, not
the way they're describing it. Very simple.
Now this is also what he continue to
put on thread.
This is a an article you can read
called South Africa's White Genocide is a Lie,
Making a Political Hoax. He writes, for those
unfamiliar with South African history, society, and politics,
here are the real receipts, the data, comprehensive
analysis, and a sober conclusion, there is no
white genocide in South Africa. It's very clear.
You can read through for yourself. This says,
understand this is not a partisan critique, and,
no, I don't vote democrat,
just calling balls and strikes. Here's what he
said in this clip. Statistics
on the scale of the problem in South
Africa is difficult because the South African government
doesn't release,
crime figures based on race.
But the latest figures that I could find,
which were covering the final quarter of last
year, so only in three months,
said that 6,953
people were murdered in the country in the
last three months of last year. And of
those, according to the South African government at
least, 12 were killed in farm attacks. And
of the twelve, one was a farmer,
five were people living on farms and four
were employees. And there's no clarity over whether
those employees were white or black.
So
no matter what you think about this, that
doesn't constitute a white genocide or any kind
of genocide according to any definition of the
term that I'm aware of. But, you know,
the the number of murders in South Africa
as a whole
is horrendous,
but it could be described as genocide. And
to my mind, Patrick, this is this is
all about Israel. It appears to me, Mike,
anyway, that this looks like there's a political
thing going on here. Right. And we trace
the genealogy of this issue. And what we
found, this issue, how did it get to
the White House level? That's the question.
And it came from Elon Musk on x.
He started promoting at the same time a
lot of top Israeli lobbyist accounts like Tommy
Robinson, all these other sort of accounts. They
all tend to tweet the same things. Right.
There's a whole gaggle of these accounts. And
Elon Musk was saying, is there a white
genocide going? South Africa's passing anti legislation.
They're confiscating white farmers' land. None of that
was true. There's been no white farmers' land
confiscated by the government. So Trump was lying.
Trump probably doesn't know.
He also said there's a genocide. That's another
lie. But then from Elon, Marco Rubio then
retweeted it and then amplified the issue, and
that caused a retaliation by South Africa diplomatically,
which caused a diplomatic tit for tat, which
has led us to this,
position by Donald Trump having to have an
emergency meeting with South African's leadership to try
to resolve this issue. And so I think
it'll be interesting to see what happens when
they basically tell him the facts. I do
think the fact that South Africa has raised
this case in the ICJ
has made them a big target of the
Israeli lobby.
To use the term genocide
so willy nilly demeans an actual
ongoing violent historic proportions
genocide, livestreamed
genocide that we've never seen in our lifetimes.
Okay? It demeans it. It reduces the significance
of it. This whole issue seems like it's
geopolitical
gaslighting
for the benefit
of Israel against the one country that stood
up,
against Israel and filed that case at the
international court.
I don't know how that just happened. Give
me a second, guys.
Something just freaked out on me right there.
Pushed me out of the room. Give me
a second.
Let me play a clip for you real
quick while I get everything lined back up.
Gotta love how this stuff works.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet, and we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. And I think you should
get a one year jail sentence if you
do anything to desecrate the American flag. Now
people will say, oh, it's unconstitutional.
Those are stupid people. Those are stupid people
that say that.
This one too.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7 be repeated here on Americans. We
will not let that happen, and we will
solve the problem that we have.
Okay.
God. So strange. Does any you know, did
anybody else deal with that? I don't even
know what the heck that was. Okay.
Back to it.
So those clips, in case you forget, were,
I think, 02/2016.
Trump saying we should close-up the Internet with
Bill Gates. You know? Free speech. You're an
idiot. And then the the flag, same point.
Let me know you guys are still here,
actually. Let me know you could see me.
I'm I'm worried that something else is going
on.
Give me give me a comment in the
chat. Let me know you guys can still
hear me. I'm not getting the same
info here. You know what I think happens
when that goes on if you guys are
still listening? At least you'll be able to
hear this when I repost this if we've
lost connection.
When that goes down like that, I'm pretty
sure that cuts connection with the with the
the streams happening on Twitter
and others.
I think that's absolutely on purpose.
Just my personal opinion.
Oh, you can hear me? Okay. Good.
That's that's frustrating.
Okay. Let's continue.
We should we have, only, you know, a
couple more segments left, and we'll be wrapping
up here today. But, yeah, just I really
do think that's part of it. I think
that part of this is losing like, you
know, it used to happen on YouTube where
if you kinda lost connection, all of a
sudden, it would, like, cut the feed and
restart a brand new video. That I used
to point out that that was very clearly
by design because it cut off the,
yeah, someone they're making sure you know. Okay.
We're good. So let's keep going. But it
cuts off the connection. People lose that.
So let's continue.
Where were we? Okay.
So were were we playing
well, I've if if I finished his video
or not, let's just keep going. So, basically,
the video was was, where they were going
over
Patrick Henningsen was going over the lie of
that and how you know what? I think
I didn't finish that. Let me play that.
And that is specifically around how Elon and
them are involved with manipulating this.
Where was that?
How interesting. There it is.
So let me play that, and then I'll
make sure I got everything else lined up
where we had it. And see, this is
also part of it. You know? Everything's organized,
and suddenly, it's not.
Here we go.
Putting statistics on the scale of the problem
in South Africa is
and those there's no clarity for whether those
employees were white or black.
So
no matter what you think about this, that
doesn't constitute a white genocide or any kind
of genocide according to any definition of the
term that I'm aware of. But, you know,
the the number of murders in South Africa
as a whole is horrendous,
but it could be described as genocide. And
to my mind, Patrick, this is this is
all about Israel. It appears to me, Mike,
anyway, that this looks like there's a political
thing going on here. Right. And we trace
the genealogy of this issue. And what we
found, this issue, how did it get to
the White House level? That's the question.
And it came from Elon Musk on x.
He started promoting at the same time a
lot of top Israeli lobbyist accounts like Tommy
Robinson, all these other sort of accounts. They
all tend to tweet the same things. Right.
There's a whole gaggle of these accounts. And
Elon Musk was saying, is there a white
genocide going? South Africa's
passing anti legislation.
They're confiscating white farmers' land. None of that
was true. There's been no white farmers' land
confiscated by the government. So Trump was lying.
Trump probably doesn't know.
He also said there's a genocide. That's another
lie. But then from Elon,
Marco Rubio then retweeted it and then amplified
the issue, and that caused a retaliation by
South Africa diplomatically,
which caused a diplomatic tit for tat, which
has led us to this,
position by Donald Trump having to have an
emergency meeting.
Yeah. So I I think we played all
that. But just in case we didn't, that
was just getting getting back to that.
K. So continuing on his thread. He says,
again, the entire white genocide narrative was fabricated
and is driven by North American, European, far
right opportunists looking to generate cheap political capital
through race baiting and fear.
And then he says, we can also point
out the Trump stack of this is what
we already showed you. A thousand articles, Internet
articles provided by his genius staff do not
show white genocide either. Either. In fact, some
of them had nothing to do with South
Africa at all.
Do you really I mean, you gotta wonder.
Is that just simple incompetence?
Or are they are they could they just
not find it and they thought a big
stack would make sense and that no Trump
would pick it up? I I just don't
know. I mean, it real why didn't you
if that was the case, why wouldn't you
just make a stack of empty I it
seems insane to me that this I guess
the major point, I'm wondering whether part of
this is because we're supposed to see this.
Like, in the interest of, like, Israel destroying
this country. I I just don't know. But
I I wonder
how dumb this can get and how people
still can't see through it. He says, the
craziest part of all this is that it
only takes two minutes on Google to debunk
all the cheap hoax claims made by Trump
and his inner circle. Clearly, none of his
staff are competent enough to check their propaganda
or, again, something else is going on.
And he goes in conclusion, so the whole
thing is story is proven to be a
% fake, breaks it all down.
Those with the eyes to see it, and
ears to hear
it. And this is a and and one
of the people is ignite you know, Visual
Vox saying, Trump just played his ace card
showing and this is the that's the thing
right there. All of those crosses,
that's they're claiming it's all dead white farmer.
It's not.
Even Grok will tell you. Do it right
now for yourself. Grok, is that what it
is? And don't blindly trust it. Look through
source material. Look at the articles about it.
Read it. Understand that's not what it is.
We just played you the video where they're
telling you that. He says, this is typical
anonymous this this is a typical anonymous influencer
account, pro Elon Trump,
which many believe accepts large sums of money
to boost, promote selected persons, issues, pay to
play. Here it is pushing the proven lie
of white genocide in South Africa, Twitter's big
business for political propaganda.
Like and this person says and this is
why I why I wanted to share this.
I stand by president Trump's assertions
about the targeted killings of white farmers in
South Africa. You see the point? It's a
it's a side. Doesn't matter if the father
stand with Trump and what he says.
It's crucial to address the issue regardless of
any media narratives. You know, facts don't matter
anymore. The safety and well-being of all people
should be our priority. What what you just
said counter that undermines that point. And Patrick
says, then you stand with fake news. Educate
yourself. But the point is people will choose
to stand with their side
as it is as it's designed.
I choose to stand by the president. Well,
perfect time to read this quote again. As
Theodore Roosevelt said, to announce that there must
be no criticism of the president, or that
we should stand by the president right or
wrong
is not only unpatriotic
and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American people.
And so you understand.
Servile. Having or showing an excessive willingness to
serve or please others, a characteristic of slaves.
Digest that.
Now before we finish with the the conversation
of the Israeli embassy staff that were killed,
I think it's important to see well, understand
two things. I think we'll get into the
second thing in the middle of this conversation.
But two things. One, which is that we've
seen a lot of kind of, like, amplified
false stories that have been building up to
what just happened.
And I think a lot of it's meant
to pull away from what's been going on,
but also manufacture consent for the the continually
growing effort to
arrest Americans for criticism of Israel, which is
really what they're doing.
So first, I'm gonna show you an example
of that, something that Alex Jones
pushed to the sky, which is, I argue,
a a a Israeli,
manipulation.
We've seen this endlessly. And the second thing
is how often that is the case, How
prevalent
you can prove that's been going on. Like
I said in the beginning.
And we it's I mean, the amount of
evidence you have just since October 7 that
they've been caught faking Nazi symbols on people's
cars or, you know, burnt literally getting caught
as a Jewish person creating a fake anti
Semitic crime or violently attacking people and claiming
you were attacked. I mean, over and over
and over or going back to the ADL,
faking Nazi marches. Plenty of other things. Or
for that matter,
we'll see if we've got, some space for
it.
Just a quick point about the ADL
and and the clip that we played before
and how they are a spy agency.
Have the power to monitor social media activity
across all major platforms
and change social media algorithms the way they
see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan
Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL. We work
with YouTube to have we to get them
to change their algorithms. We work with Facebook
on trying to use a redirect method. So
a Facebook executive
didn't.
It's piracy fact. PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Just to understand this, is
this simply a research effort or is the
ultimate goal, I imagine, to effectively defund them,
which is to say that PayPal would effectively
turn off the spigot Like a big least
turn off the ability for them to fundraise
using PayPal.
That's correct, Andrew. Right. And just like when
they did at the meet, when they boxed
us out of the platform and we lost
$6,000,
they hoped that would be the end of
this to their.
We are gonna keep going.
Is
an Israeli spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel.
So
here's a clip. The Canary Mission. Right? The
Canary Mission was the the name called out
by by name in the court about the
batar tweet that got the person arrested.
I might be able to get that to
pop up, actually.
It doesn't look like it. Maybe this one.
Nope. Oh, well. So the point is
Canary Mission was called out by name in
that court in that court document about how
it can basically, Batar US took their false
claim and used that tweet to show
the I basically, people in in the administration,
and that guy got arrested for it. Forty
eight hours.
Turned out they lied about it, and he
got released. Now had that not been held
up by something else, he might well be
in El Salvador right now. That's the point.
So the point back to the origin point
is the Canary Mission was lying or didn't
know they were wrong, didn't care. So this
clip's been going around. And I don't we
have seen so many of these of this
woman, like, proudly saying, Zig Hayel with with
a, hijab arm. Here's the clip. Oh, fucking
Hitler. Call fucking Hitler. And any fucking I
forgot that she's cursing, by the way. So
if there's children, she says the f word.
Give you a second to earmuff them.
Paul fucking Hitler. And any fucking Hitler's friend
or fucking anti Zion Zionist fucking fuck you
guys do. Paul fucking Hitler. Paul fucking Hitler.
And guess what? I will pray for you.
What do you do for Palestinian movies? I
will say, you can listen to the rest
if you want. The bottom line is, if
you're out there saying that you're anti Zionist
and then doing that, you're a moron or
you don't understand either of them. And I
think I don't even know that exists. I've
never met a person in my life that,
like, it's like saying that Hamas are are
Nazis. It's it's absurdly stupid.
It doesn't they just pull it ideologically
even make sense. And so the bottom line
is that should be questionable from the beginning,
but certainly could exist because anything's possible.
But the point is
Alex Jones highlights that, which a lot of
them did, and he says, I don't like
Adolf Hitler, and I don't hate the anti
and I also hate the anti free speech
police state the West is turning into.
Well, you're very brave to state those things.
Hitler is dead, but the globalist system has
not yet been totally dismantled.
It's the main threat to humanity.
A woman was detained by police in California
for shouting, Heil Hitler, and performing a salute.
America is not a free country if this
continues.
I mean, do you already know where this
is going about how that's so stupid for
him? I mean, it's hollow. And I said,
it's happening because of the very people you
support, which you know. I know he does.
And they are also the ones quite literally
rolling out the globalist agenda, as you also
know, even as you pretend it's being dismantled.
Right? So what the I mean, come on.
Really? Like, the idea that we're gonna talk
about the almost the what dismantled globalism we're
talking about? I've never seen a more unified
building direction for that whole conversation.
It's just it's sad how this keeps happening.
But the idea that you don't like the
police state, who do you think that's coming
from, bud? Who do you think is Trump?
Donald Trump's administration,
both times, have pushed forward the antisemitism bill,
which is why that's happening.
So you're gonna just skip over that major
part of the conversation that you don't like
what it's turning into? Of course, he'll give
lip service to calling out parts of Trump
when that happens, but never actually mobilize anything
against it or always support them when it
matters because these people aren't honest.
The point though was getting this out there.
Right?
Well, turns out oh, by the way, also
another example. Weird how it happened in multiple
locations where this Muslim supposed Muslim would just
couldn't stop going up people with phones and
going, dude, Ohio.
And yelling right in front of them. Right?
And it just so happened to be Canary
Mission and antisemitism. Makes sense. Or people that
got the videos.
Seems weird to me. Here she is doing
the same thing.
I mean, come on. It just and this
is stop anti semitism. She'll drive her were
detained and questioned by police, which, yes, is
insane that you're being questioned and attained for
saying
anything.
And that's the point.
Here she is.
And this is, doctor Anastasia pointing out thoughts
on this woman.
This person says she's a Mossad agent and
definitely not a Muslim. Here she is. We'll
just just cut right to her her account.
Here she is on her account. Not to
say that just because she's being scantily dressed
that it proves that she's not a Muslim,
but it you know, you're wearing a hijab
over here. Okay? If you're wearing a hijab
and then you're on your video bro showing
off your naked body, that's a contradictory thing.
Okay?
But may maybe who knows? Maybe she just
doesn't care. But when it comes down to
it, the point that I'll find that I
find most interesting is that she has a
tattoo that appears to be Hebrew. And so
I don't understand
how that would make sense.
This is not complete. It's open the air.
I'm gonna show you that I think these
things are verifiably happening and have been for
a long time because
of intelligence operations or whatever you wanna call
it. This to me is either well, let's
just put it like this. Even if she's
a Muslim,
I find it to be very, very suspect
because all of it doesn't line up and
the the two things don't make sense to
me when you look at this, and everyone
else is calling out similar things. You can
look into it. You can look at her
YouTube account or, excuse me, her
Instagram, and you'll find a lot of Israel
comments and stuff. I think that's very telling.
And let's not forget that Donald Trump's administration
rolled out the antisemitism bill that Alex Jones
is pointing at as if it's a pro
which doesn't seem to have an issue when
they roll it out, and it's promises kept
every day. Anyone who's troubled by the new
bill, Michael writes, that radically expands the definition
of federally criminalizable
antisemitism
really ought to direct their frustration to Trump
because the bill passed yesterday largely codifies the
executive order that he issued in 2019.
No surprise there. If you're following this platform,
that's what they're they're that is saying Americans
will be criminalized
for speaking
truth about what Israel's doing.
Or by that fact, just saying things about
Israel even if they're not true, which still
protect them into free speech.
That's important.
So how is the oh, over here outraged
about that woman and how they're
that's why. I just think that's insane
very clear what's going on. They've refused to
acknowledge that. Now here's an overlap that brings
back to the immigration point, which they all
seem to support, generals included, calling out without
acknowledging
that it's a foundational
issue for constitutional rights. Sam can see it.
Sam Tripoli says, so gross. These antisemitic laws,
antisemitism laws, are simply Trojan horses to martial
law and shredding of the constitution.
See? Sam sees it. And here is, you
know, another politician, which is on the left,
which again, that so I'm I I reason
I'm gonna say I was gonna go into
it, but I'm not. The point is, don't
dismiss things because of personally this side of
the argument. Guys, look at the facts.
They they desperately need that from you. They
need you to choose a side and push
back on anything that's not from your side.
That is the easiest way they can manipulate.
The point is regardless of what she's saying,
what's happening is Rubio is telling you that
Ozturk
got held got got got her visa revoked
for an op ed. That's it. We know
that already. But the point is that that's
where this is going, that they're choosing to
do so. And what's the point about the
op ed? Because it calls out Israel. So
right there is an example. In principle, no
different than removing your right to be here
as as American. It's the same constitutional right.
A guest in The United States on a
student visa. No one's entitled to a student
visa. So you do not She no. See.
When they start with the guest point. You
gave her a visa. So once that's done,
you can't then just yank it for no
reason. That's not what they really want ignorant
people to think. It's not true.
You have to prove these things. Yeah. There
are re valid reasons why it would get
yanked, but you have to prove those like
anything else. Here's what we claim she did.
Here's the evidence to back it up. They
don't have any of that. You can't yank
her visa because she wrote an article about
Israel. That's what he's arguing is the case.
So just as a constitutional American out there
that understands rights,
you should be outraged by that.
States on a student visa. No one's entitled
to a student visa. So you are both
interested in getting a visa on based on
an op ed, which trumps the supreme
law of the land, which is the constitution.
Coming up here to steal our problems on
our campus. We're gonna revoke their visas. She
didn't she didn't do that at all, not
even remotely. And they've they've tried desperately to
manufacture a case that doesn't exist. That's why
she was already released. Do any of that.
She wrote an op ed. She wrote an
op ed, and I'm talking to you about
her particular case. Claims in your bank claim.
The facts.
Are you serious?
Like, you see, this is how crazy this
is. Rubio is doing that to make a
point that gets shred on Twitter that people
claim is the truth because they're dumb enough
to not look at the facts. If you
look at what Rubio and the rest of
them actually argued in court, nobody has anything.
That's what happened in court. That's why she
was released. They're still trying to deport her,
but they don't have any evidence other than
an op ed. That is literally it. And
he just lied
publicly because he's hoping people are dumb enough
to go. He said it, therefore, that is
the case, which some of them don't even
care.
That'll become the talking point because they just
hate her
or they wanna fight the Democrats or fight
the whatever they think they're doing, and you're
helping them destroy the constitution.
Reclaiming my time, you revoked her student visa
Yes. Because she wrote an op ed. Would
you revoke gonna do more. If I have
a And he's doubling down. We'll do more.
We'll do more. This just shows you the
kind of juvenile nature of Rubio. Like, he's
just I think it's about him trying to
bluster. I think he's a very small person
in a lot of ways. The visa of
anyone who's in this country as a guest.
He's here to stir up trouble. The visa?
Here to stir up trouble?
Is that a law now? Or what's the
walk me through the law, Rubio, of stirring
up trouble.
You know, see, this is what's so embarrassing.
You damn well know out there if you
know even the smallest amount, clearly more than
Rubio apparently, or I just think he's lying,
to be honest. You know that doesn't make
sense. There's no legal reality there.
Be honest about this, guys. You have to
be clear about how big what a big
deal this is.
Visa of anyone who's in this country as
a guest is here at the Tropics. Revoke
the visa of somebody who made that? The
case. So look at it. I'm looking I'm
looking to get crazy. Oh, and by the
way, let's not forget. There were two other
writers. What about them, Rubio? What'd they do?
The same thing. Exactly the two other authors
of the op ed. Let's be clear. Regardless
of whether you don't know any better, if
you read what was presented in court, the
evidence that they had, that's it.
The national security threat she poses by ideas
she put forward in that op ed. What
about the other two?
Weird how they weren't called out. You know
why? Because she's been a vocal opposition. She's
been protesting. That's why.
They know what they're doing, and this is
straight from the hands of Israel. You're this
is Israel First all day long at the
expense of Americans.
Anyone who's in this country as a guest
is here for a trial. The visa of
somebody who made that the case. I look
at it. I'm looking I'm looking at crazy
people.
Not just about revoking. You actually the visa
of any of the old executive claiming my
time. If these are legitimate law enforcement agents
carrying out proper arrests, why are they hiding
their identities? Exactly. Because then radical crazies will
try to hurt them. I knew it. It's
so funny. I didn't even hear I that
I that is so ridiculous to me. So
the idea clear so basically, by that logic,
then literally everybody should always hide their identity,
never never present a warrant.
The idea they're trying to turn it into
the radical lefties are going to attack them.
Well, it's the same exact argument for radical
righties doing the same thing in reverse. It's
it's the point is it doesn't matter. The
law is what matters. They're they are legally
required
to prevent present
a warrant.
And and if you ask and have a
badge ready, identify themselves. That's the law. They're
required to do that, but they don't care.
Just one after another showing you how little
they care about the things that we hold
sacred in this country.
And let's not forget, by the way,
I've been warning people, there's a lot of
these clips here. There and there's plenty more
I could add to this. It goes on
and on and on about Trump telling you
that he will work for Israel at the
expense of American interests. And I'll just play
this one again, the one I briefly played
a second ago of him telling you point
blank,
remove the Jew haters from the country. And
then all of a sudden, this starts happening
and we're pretending like they're not the same
conversation.
That's what he's doing. Now let's be clear.
The people they're going after or the people
they're calling that, most of them are just
supporting Palestine.
But even if they're out there saying, I
hate Jewish people, that is your right under
free speech, under ideological freedom. A %.
If If you can stand up and say,
I hate white people, you can stand up
and say, I hate anything.
I can say you're disgusting for either, and
I would say that. The point is you
damn well know it's under protected under your
rights. But here's what he said, and we
tried to warn everybody. We will remove the
jihadist sympathizers
and Jew haters. And by the way, jihadist
sympathizer can mean whatever the hell they want
it to mean, and it's still unless you're
providing material support for x, y, and z,
still your ideological right to say and think
what you want.
But every day, every second, they're inching the
national security interest forward
in expense to the expense of your rights.
I mean, it's very it's self evident.
Every day, the Patriot Act going forward. I
mean, every moment, every event, every time, they're
grabbing more.
We used to all be able to see
this, it seems. We're gonna remove the Jew
haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country,
and we will never let the horrors of
October 7 be repeated here on American soil.
We will remove we will us consider deposit
and be done with it. Where where is
that? What what do you mean repeated? That
that is an Israeli claim which and quite
frankly, most people come to understand it as
a threat.
Right? Well, especially since you understand that they
fund Hamas, which is easy to prove right
up until October 7, that they very clearly
did this to keep them divided. They lied
about the previous deals. They've been lying about
literally everything ever since. The pager point, which
will be relevant in a second. I'll play
that clip for you, I think, next, coming
up in or two clips.
What do they tell you about the pagers?
The world is our stage,
and we can't then think about whether what
just happened or what might happen tomorrow is
somehow part of that play?
Certainly worth your time.
Check watch these for yourself. Be blown away
with how ridiculous all these is. Or this
one where he literally says that Israel used
to own Congress and should, rightly so, clearly
still does.
And here's Jones. The assassination last night of
the Israeli diplomat and his wife in DC
paves the way for more coming attacks that
will serve as the pretext for the Israeli
assault on Iran's nuclear facilities that has a
high probability of triggering nuclear war. The globalists
are turning up the heat.
It's funny to me. So even in that
statement, you're almost weirdly
acknowledging that Israel are the globalist or at
least a huge part of this. But in
every other effort, you find a way to
push that away or wiggle out of it
and never acknowledge what's actually happening.
Find that interesting.
But the idea of the these assassinations and
the on the I mean, they're obviously, the
overlap in foreign policy can't be ignored.
But what we're talking about here is something
immediately happening here. And he's over here talking
about it, the woman in the street and
censorship and and but then this happens? And
they all immediately start calling for censorship? And
that's the go I come on. I think
we need to start recognizing how easily these
people are just, like,
immediately trying to derail you. Look over there.
Talk about this. Conflating conversations.
Never really seeing the full picture, especially since
it always comes down to Democrat deep state
pedophiles, instead of the reality that that's pretty
much your whole government.
What we know about the DC shooting where
two staff members of the Israeli embassy were
killed.
It says two staff members of the Israeli
embassy in Washington were fatally shot, this is
today or yesterday, excuse me, evening while the
well, yesterday evening while leaving an event at
a Jewish museum.
The suspect yelled, free, free Palestine after he
was arrested.
The attack was seen by officials in Israel
and The US as the latest in a
growing wave of antisemitism.
As Israel ramps up its offense in the
Gaza Strip, as the food security experts have
warned that Gaza risks that Gaza risks falling
into famine. Yeah. I love what they've all
they for they've been in famine stage, according
to the IPC, for half a year.
But they're always one step away from you
know, it's it's it's always how they keep
this, like, we're about to they've been there.
It's done. They're starving to death.
The point,
though
what was it? The, oh, yeah. So okay.
So he says free Palestine. Anyone who explained
for me what that has to do with
Jewish people?
Yeah. The Israeli embassy. Sure. Do you know
there are atheists who live there too? Right?
You know there are people that are not
Jewish?
But that so the point is, they're telling
you it's anti Semitic. And then when they
when you ask why when you're talking about
free Palestine and somebody who shot Israelis and,
well, because it's Israel, that's the Jews. But
then you say that and you're racist. I
mean, it's just it's such a this is
why the whole thing is crumbling crumbling in
front of people because you can't be racist
when you point and say what they just
told you was happening. But that's the game.
You're racist no matter what. And that's the
whole thing we keep seeing is that people
are calling everybody anti Semitic. Like, Smotrich just
called somebody anti Semitic for simply saying that
their plan was gonna hurt Gossens. It's it's
just constantly lazy.
I think they know that nobody's buying it,
and this this narrative is about maintaining government
control.
Here's what it says. The suspect was observed
pacing outside the museum before the shooting,
walked into the museum after the shooting, and
was detained.
Fantastic. So it says when when he was
taken into custody, he begins shouting, free, free
Palestine.
The law enforcement did not believe there was
an ongoing threat to the community. It was
not immediately clear whether Rodriguez had an attorney
who could comment on his behalf. A telephone
number listed on public records rang unanswered.
You know, as as lawyers typically do, just
leave their own phones on ringing all day
long. Right? Or it seems like something was
constructed here. You can decide for yourself. But
I find it insanely stupid that you're talking
about somebody who shot people and then walked
inside the museum to be arrested.
And then when the photo opportunity's ready, you
have Palestine.
Maybe. Maybe he just want but then, if
we're talking about killing Jewett, where is the
evidence of racially motivated actions?
Seems like a government action about Israel killing
people in Palestine. But, see, they need to
conflate these things. Now, whatever the reality is,
I think it's important to go through this
and understand the bigger picture around it and
understand how this is already being used.
Sal Yagura says all violence is wrong, obviously.
I agree with him. But the reason m
and mainstream media focuses on the death of
two Israelis and not on the 82 to,
82 to 98 Palestinians whom Israel's murdered the
past twenty four hours, which is basically every
day right now, is to round out support
for their war machine.
All of it matters. No. One is not
the people kill being killed matters. The point,
though, is that if you're gonna make such
a huge focus on these two, what about
the other 98 that were killed over the
last 24 or any other number of examples?
It's not just in Gaza. You could make
many examples of people, but this is what
they all focus on. You can't miss why
that is.
Nader also points out this overlap. He says,
weird. I don't remember mainstream media, pro Israel
social media accounts, or politicians saying a word
about this when it happened.
Two months ago, Jewish man mistakes two Israeli
tourists for Palestinians,
opens fire on them in Miami.
We talked about that. So you're in Florida.
A Jewish man
thinks these Israeli tourists are Palestinians and fires
at them.
Think about how wild that is. That barely
got any attention.
Isn't it, like, the exact same thing in
reverse? Well, yeah. That's a perfect example to
show you why
some people are more equal than others in
the minds of these bas in the corporate
media and the government. Michael Treacy says blowback
used to be a well understood concept.
If The US is going to politically and
militarily enable an endless annihilation campaign in Gaza,
it's overwhelmingly
foreseeable that blowback should occur in form of
violent, irrational attacks by radicalized rogue actors.
The The point simply is that it's
obviously expected not to say we that it's
it's okay.
There are crimes and people should be held
accountable for crimes regardless of your side or
how justifiable you may think it is. The
bottom line is that we know this has
kinda happened. The people, whether in this country
or elsewhere,
are going to be,
like, not just motivated,
like, radicalized to the idea that they're going
to attack the people that murdered that they
the people that allowed their family to be
raped and tortured and mutilated in front of
them.
I mean, ask what conservatives would do if
somebody invaded Florida or wherever state they're in
and then did that to their family.
You're gonna go to the ICJ?
You're gonna walk to the police station and
say, hey. I mean, come on, guys. You
know damn well what most of these people
ignoring what's going on over there would be
doing without a second thought. It would be
revolution.
The cradle says Israeli embassy employee, one of
the ones that were killed in Washington, had
served in Israeli military openly supported the Gaza
genocide. One of the Israeli embassy employees killed
on Washington on Wednesday, Yaron Leshinskie,
had served in the Israeli military and dismissed
UN warnings about mass child deaths from starvation
in Gaza as blood libel,
even though it's completely provable. Days before his
death, he endorsed Israel's Gideon Chariots operation, an
official strategy to occupy and seize full control
of Gaza through a ground
invasion, forcibly displace its population to a southern
enclave or outside the country,
and restrict humanitarian aid to the minimum.
This is one of them here.
We'll show you why I think this is
important in a second, seeing as how he
doesn't appear to be Jewish.
He retweets this.
Here, as the squirrel breaks down, Levit Luchinski
was not even Jewish. He was a crazed
Christian Zionist who volunteered to serve in the
Israel army and did propaganda for them at
the embassy. This makes calling this an antisemitic
attack, interesting, doubly deranged, and actually the height
of antisemitism,
typical, by conflating Israel and non Jewish Israelis
with all Jews.
Not when they do it though, of course.
And, of course, the entire media and political
class is doing it with utter glee so
they can launder genocidal Zionist propaganda.
Well, you could this is this is very
easy to prove, by the way. A Christian
Zionist is who this person was, who served
in the IDF,
and as they say, dedicated his life to
Israel and and Zionism.
So, doesn't that matter? All the people are
calling it a racially a anti
Semitic attack, and the guy's not Jewish. One
of them, anyway. So that makes it a
multiracial
attack? I mean, you can't keep pretending it's
what they say when the facts aren't there.
And here's what you keep getting. These are
the so called journalists, like Christopher Cuomo, who
probably don't even look they probably don't even
know this guy's a Christian Zionist. He says
well, this is court, AOC,
saying absolutely nothing justifies the murder of innocents.
Well, I agree with that. I am devastated
by the killing of two people outside of
the the event here in Washington. Our prayers
are with the victims, families, and loved ones
of all impacted.
As we await more details, you must be
clear that hatred has no home here. Antisemitism
is a threat to all. They're all
online with that.
Antisemitism is no more a threat than any
other word, racial idea, or that it is
a thought, and you can call it out
if you want to.
The point is that when you begin the
idea that you're supposed to be
going after and suppressing, holding accountable one certain
kind of hatred, it becomes weaponized.
Once crimes are committed, there are laws for
these things. That's how this works.
Every one of them are driving us the
same direction. They're all behind the idea of
censoring you for certain ideas. Her point goes
on to say, antisemitism is a threat to
all we hold dear in a society. It
must be confronted with her. So she's literally
all in line with all of them, and
that's not enough, though. See, Christopher Cuomo saw
an opportunity to be the one that gets
more attention.
You're not you're not pro Zionist enough, he
says. He comes out and goes, not just
innocents, Jews.
Why ignore that? You know all you need
to do or you is and you know
all you need to. The shooter confessed and
said why he did it. No. He said,
free Palestine. And many who support him call
him a hero.
Wow.
As she says, probably because the guy was
literally a Christian, you propagandist hack.
These people are shameless, guys. But it doesn't
matter. He'll be supported for it because he
used the idea that it was focused on
Jew it's a anti Semitism attack. Okay. Well,
Suppressed News points out an interesting overlap. It's
interesting how on the same day that Israel,
which you might have seen, shot at European
and Arab diplomats,
who they did. Two Israeli embassy staff were
shot and killed in Washington, same day. What
a coincidence. And now the focus shifts to
how Jews feel and safe in the world.
Meanwhile, as far as you could tell, by
the way, other than conflating
Palestine with anything, they they they've gotten caught
for this every time they try to push
the narrative.
Ask Jewish people all over the world, they
seem more safe than ever or as safe
as anybody else in any other circumstance. There's
racially motivated violence anywhere. Now today, though, you
could see an uptick because of what Zionism
is doing, because of what Israel is doing,
and it's unjustified.
People that are attacking them because of Zionism,
who tells them it's because of Jewish people,
and it's not. It's insane how obvious this
is. The point, though, is you can keep
showing that the ADL gets caught over and
over conflating
Palestinian flags with thrusted Jewish people or lying
about people getting stabbed with flags or lying
about people getting locked in libraries, lying, lying,
lying
every moment
and get the next claim taken at face
value.
That's not by accident.
Meanwhile, Israelites shot diplomats, killed over 19,000 children,
over 210 journalists, and bombed schools and hospitals.
But somehow,
it's still all about Zionist, how Zionists feel.
Thank you to Lemming for point point pointing
this out. Here's the clip, by the way.
You can see this, and there's a lot
more evidence around this. They claim they shot
over them or something. They basically shot right
at these people.
Of course. And then it spins out and
they say that there was an accident and
they were it was a mistake and they
feel it's they do it every single day,
guys. And on top of that, they do
this right after other discussions that made them
very embarrassed. It's it's it's constant what these
people are doing.
You can't just keep pretending that these are
not they've shot diplomats. They've shot UN members.
They've shot UN remembers. They've shot World Central
Kitchen members. They've shot Doctors Without Borders. I
mean, how are we still pretending like this
doesn't make sense? It's infuriating to pretend like
this is not the most obvious thing in
the world.
And James Lee points out search is the
new censorship. Okay. So you've got them shooting
at diplomats, which, by the way, was everywhere
and was pretty embarrassing for them. Then the
very next day.
So he types in Israel shooting diplomats.
That's what it shows you. Foreign diplomats come
under fire in the West Bank. Okay. The
very next day, Israel shooting diplomats.
Two Israeli embassy staff are shot. Two Israeli
that's all you get.
Almost as if you made sure it was
an embassy overlap so that diplomat point got
buried. I mean, I know that sounds very
conspiratorial.
We need to be aware of how gross
these people are, what they're willing to do.
And he says simply pointing out the search.
You you can't deny that.
The, Noctis Draven says, they are going to
blow this way up. I promise. Be prepared
to see this. This is opinion. Be all
over the news. That is what's happening.
Media, celebrities, the accounts here, you expect, of
course, will will
pound this home nonstop, which we're already seeing.
Mark my words. He says this entire week
will be filled with every talking head, every
pundit, every account commentator to pull us into
war with Iran. Now it could be that,
and we haven't touched on that yet. Because
to me, at this point, we've heard them
float this many times. If you haven't seen
Israel, the supposed leak is that Israel's planning
to hit Iran, which might for crying out
loud, yes, most likely. It's not
new. But the it's a I think, since
we touch on it, that that's them floating
this idea that's always on the table to
say that if you don't make the deal
with Trump, then then that's what's gonna happen.
Like, that's what I think that fake leak
was about. Basically, using one more course of
tool to say, make this deal or you're
gonna get bombed, which Iran already knows they're
willing to do. So I I don't know
how that plays out. I think this is
coming regardless of whether they make this thing
happen in this country. But I think me
for me,
far more about censorship, suppression, and control of
our lives in this country. And the Iran
point will overlap. There there's always multifaceted.
But you can't miss how this plays into
the long term agenda in regard to the
speech and also arresting Americans, deporting Americans based
on
accusations of Israel. It says, mark my word.
The entire week we filled with this.
Pushing into war with Iran and to and
he and he adds that point too, to
tackle hate speech on Twitter and other platforms,
which is what they say. This will they
will say, Twitter and other social media is
harboring hate speech. Nothing new. Now it's antisemitism
instead of something else. To cost Americans and
Jewish people their lives. No. They'll just skip
the they'll just skip Americans and say Jewish
people, which is what they're doing. Mark my
words. They are all dressed and ready for
their presser, ready to spin the BS. By
this time tomorrow night, boomers across America will
be begging for war with Iran, begging to
have more speed free speech taken away. %
false flag, he says.
Also, get ready to send kids to grandkids
for, get send your kids to die for
Israel. Now I I don't know. I I
my gut tells me this was completely manufactured.
Not necessarily people didn't die or that maybe
they killed their own.
Hannibal directive is something we know happened. So
it wouldn't surprise me they're willing to go
that far, especially with what's on the line,
guys. They they are in the middle of
a genocide. The whole world can see. You
should not think anything's outside of out, you
know,
outside of the realm of possibility here.
Here's what she said.
Mayor, thank you. Chief,
thank you.
Ambassador, our hearts go out to you and
your staff.
I spoke to the president of The United
States multiple times tonight on behalf of the
president.
His prayers are with
all of us, all of the Jewish community,
everyone in Washington, DC,
state, local, and federal agencies, and our great
US attorney, Janine Pirro, who will be prosecuting
this case,
will be doing everything in our power to
keep all citizens
safe. So just like Tesla, this becomes mission
number one. Everything else you want conservatives, Republicans,
Americans. That's all bad. That's backseat now. This
is number one. Mark my words. That's I
guarantee you. Her one of her first things
she came out to do was to start
an investigation on October 7.
How does that even relate to Americans other
than the the few American overlaps? That's wild
to me.
Clearly, this is an an Israel first administration.
That's not even that's not even contentious anymore.
I mean, literally, people like Napo Napolitano,
Jeffrey Sachs, people that are on mainstream, they're
going, this is complete or or colonel Gregor
just said or colonel McGregor just said that.
He's owned by the Israel lobby. You remember
when that used to be some very crazy
thing to say? Guys, the evidence is
everywhere.
Especially tonight, our Jewish community.
Our prayers go out. We have the FBI.
All of our federal agencies will work hand
in hand with you, chief, as we have
done and you mayor to do everything we
can to keep our citizens safe. We will
follow the facts. We will follow the law.
And this defendant,
if charged, will be prosecuted to the fullest
It's funny. I I get the sense that
somebody clearly told her to say if charged
because they never seem to do that. You
know, this because basically, the point is we'll
do what charge we want, and I think
they're recognizing
how their language can be taken. I I
think they know that they're losing, in my
opinion. But I don't mean left versus right,
clearly.
Okay. But so the bigger point here is
what we already know like, this we talked
about this in regard to how it infiltrates
Israel infiltrates countries around the world. Israel's infiltration
of The US tech field
in light of the pager attack in Lebanon,
A Decade apparently, if you listen to them,
five years from the reports, they let these
pagers circulate the country.
The the argument being they're packed full of
explosives. I still question whether there might be
more of this. It might be kind of
a manufactured
narrative to to scare people. It could have
been done something they did that week, and
they claimed it was there for ten years
to scare us. But, I mean, the the
evidence backs that up. The point being they're
willing to seventy five percent of the people
hurt women and children. You can still look
up the list of kids with missing eyes
and limbs because of this. And so think
about that and what that means
for what could what other kind of operations
they're conducting for same kind of thing. You
think they aren't willing to kill innocent people
for their agenda? Look right in front of
you. Now here is what they said in
the interview.
The world is our stage.
How did you convince
Hezbollah
to buy this? And I'll I'll love this.
Clearly, that looks like the spitting image of
freedom and democracy, doesn't it? The the very
way our enforcement gestapo was starting to look.
You know, that to me looks like the
way we expect terrorists to look. Just pointing
that out.
Hezbollah
to buy this. Well, obviously, they didn't know
that they were buying it from Israel. Who
did they buy it from? Or I think
they were buying it from. We You had
an 8,200 Israeli tech companies, and that's how
it works.
There's peppered around this country right now.
Have an incredible
array of possibilities
of creating
foreign companies
that has no way been traced back to
Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a
global production company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
Think about that.
I mean, truly. Guys, I mean, that's that's
wild.
They're so brazen, and they're so full of
hubris. It's unjustified, my opinion.
Just putting it out there. They can't help
but say we're running your lives. We're controlling
what you do. Like, that's when Netanyahu gets
caught caught saying we can pit the left
first right again. We can control the US
government. He's been on video saying that more
than once, and yet we still can't see
it. I mean, they're literally telling you that
they they they the world is their stage.
They're running a production
global. He made that clear more than once.
Now maybe that's hubris and maybe he's overshooting
his reach. Kinda hard to miss what's going
on, though, isn't it? And yet we have
trouble connecting the dots sometimes when it comes
to that because people are so afraid of
being called racist. That's how it works. Now
let's talk about the prevalence.
Mossad proxy faked violent Facebook antisemitism.
This is one article from it, but
there's plenty of them. The whole of death
to all Jews turned out to be a
Jewish person. Rather, specifically, Mossad elements through the
Jewish you know, basically, Jewish Mossad agents who
are manipulating this to make it look like
they were being attacked when it turned out
they were doing it themselves, which is
never to say that there's not racist you
know, that there's not anti Semitism, there's not
racism. It exists.
But that, it is taken advantage of and
then manufactured, which then shows you that they
don't have the amount that they would be
justifiable, so they have to you know, it's
so constant. Now I'm not gonna play this
whole thing. I played it before. But I'll
I wanna play some of this because it's
a quick compilation
of showing you how many times they've lied.
Shin Bet arrest three suspects in bus bombing,
including Israeli Jews. Well, that was a recent
one we just talked about.
I think see that I think that's oh,
here it is. I was gonna say I
think I went wrong with that. Here it
is.
Again, to Crystal Palestine
stage
And in this and
in this episode, we reveal how Israel is
ramping up efforts to stage fake anti semitic
attacks across the world to undermine solidarity for
the growing pro Palestine movement.
But first, please remember to like and subscribe
to our show. Now, let's get into it.
The Zionist lobby, in a single word, is
desperate.
It's growing desperate because it's finding it increasingly
difficult to confront a growing shift in American
public opinion
towards the Palestinian people during the past year
and a half.
A new reality that's costing the Israel lobby
hundreds of millions of dollars having spent a
whopping $25,000,000
on just two of five thirty four Congressional
races during the most recent US election.
Money, however, is only one side of the
equation,
the other being manipulation.
And it's here where Israel gets really down
and dirty in the trenches.
It's here where bogus allegations of antisemitism
are used as a smokescreen to shield the
self proclaimed Jewish state from condemnation
as it commits genocide in Gaza and ethnic
cleansing in the occupied West Bank.
Yeah, you already know this. But what's new
here is the way in which Israel and
its allies He's pointing to a BBC article
that says anti Semitic crimes may be funded
overseas.
Says it's Australian police. We've talked about that
one as well. The evidence begins to show
that people are funding these things from places
like Israel.
Are staging,
manufacturing,
and sponsoring fake anti Semitic attacks in Western
countries to garner sympathy for the dying Zionist
state.
Been a huge twist in the investigation
of anti Semitic attacks across Australia. The Australian
Federal Police now investigating the possibility that some
of the perpetrators
may have been paid
by foreign actors to commit hate crimes.
In Camperdown, a 33 year old man is
arrested
over an alleged attempt to burn down a
synagogue in Sydney's Inner West. A second man
is still yet to be arrested, but we
expect to make an arrest shortly. But some
of those responsible might not even be in
the country.
The federal police dropping this bombshell. We believe
criminals for hire may be behind some incidents.
And that those criminals for hire may be
recruited and paid by someone overseas. It would
appear that some of these are being perpetrated
by people who don't have
a particular
issue, aren't motivated by an ideology, but are
paid actors.
They're so desperate, so carefully trying not to
say the obvious,
and and the evidence is there. While Channel
ten chose not to identify Israel by name
in its report, it really didn't need to
because it's patently obvious that Israel and only
Israel has everything to gain from manufactured
anti Semitic attacks.
And as someone who has long covered the
Israel lobby's intimidation tactics
against Australian media outlets, I'm acutely aware of
the pressure and threats journalists and editors have
to endure when reporting the Israeli Palestinian
conflict.
An unfortunate reality laid bare by more than
200 journalists and editors at the national broadcaster
ABC Australia. Very same news media organizations
Just just in the this is a fourteen
minute clip. It's not that long. But I
I just I don't I wanna finish this
out so we don't lose the consistency we're
talking about, but walk through it. It's it's
well done. There's and the source material below,
science groups are falsifying anti Semitism
statistics, and the media are playing along.
Daily Telegraph tries and fails to stage anti
Semitic incident. We just talked about that one
recently, actually.
Shin Bet arrest three suspects in bus bombing,
including Jews who were involved with that. They
were they were and it was claimed to
be anti Semitic. It was claimed to be
Palestinians. Zionists are staging anti Semitic incidents in
The United States.
US Israeli man jailed for ten years over
bomb hoax call bomb hoax calls. I mean,
it goes on and on and on, guys.
It's very, very, very obvious.
So I'll include the the interview we did
with James Lee about his ADL documentary. I
think it's worth your time. I'll also include
the show we did before.
There it goes. Everything's freezing up on me.
Zionism versus Nazism, Israelis can Israel's connection to
extremist ideology, and the ADL's history of taking
Nazi marches. It goes over everything we talked
about as well as the history of all
these and goes pretty deep on some of
these. Now
Dan Cohen puts this out. This was, today.
The deranged Washington DC
Israeli embassy staff
shooter gave a gift to the Zionist lobby,
shifting the international spotlight away from Israel's ongoing
genocide and starvation in of Gaza and providing
a pretext for crackdowns on constitutionally protected rights.
The fact that Ellis Rodriguez didn't attempt to
flee the scene
and made sure to have someone film him
shouting free Palestine is extremely bizarre.
Many are speculating that shootings are a false
flag, which could be true, though no conclusive
evidence has been presented. I agree. The association
between murder and free Palestine will now be
used to paint anyone who opposes genocide as
a domestic terrorist. Simple as that. Even though
that's absurd.
Just because one person says that and kills
somebody, even if they mean it, does not
then make everybody saying it guilty. But that's
the way they roll, guys. That is the
way your government works.
The American constitution is under attack. The fake
patriot government officials and media mouthpieces are salivating
at the thought of criminalizing dissent.
Exactly.
Elijah Monye says, watch carefully to see how
many world leaders will rush to condemn the
attack on the two Israeli embassy employees in
Washington, DC. Then compare this to how they
respond to Israeli crimes and Gaza that are
happening as we speak. Notice the hypocrisy double
standards. Some lives matter while others don't.
And let's not forget that Donald Trump
recently signed into law the antisemitic
the the the the what was the term
again? I forget the name of the bill.
The a new another piece of legislation,
in fact, as we pointed out,
enshrining his 02/2019 executive order that criminalizing your
speech, guys.
There's no way around this. You can see
all the people around him put I mean,
all the, you know, Dershowitz. I mean, it's
it's very clear.
This is being driven against American interests.
Now here, and this is today, as Glenn
points out, the ADL is already exploiting the
murder of two Israeli embassy staffers. The ADL
that right now works with Twitter, by the
way, to demand more limits on free speech,
specifically demanding Israeli critics
Israel critics and with large platforms such as
this one is,
I don't think I'm familiar with this one.
Be banned for speaking.
Can't even wait twenty four hours until demanding
censorship. Right? That's how this works.
Now this is going to continue. Now when
it becomes the law according to their unconstitutional
acts, which according to Mayberry Mayberry versus Madison
would be repugnant of repugnant to the constitution,
therefore, null and void. Doesn't mean they're not
gonna enforce it at the end of a
gun, though. Right?
Point is that when that becomes the case
and Elon starts saying, well, it's the law,
so we have to censor you like he's
doing in India and Turkey and everywhere else,
Is that still absolutely free speech?
Obviously, even right now, that's not the case.
But
everyone will argue otherwise because they have an
agenda.
Here
is Greenblatt already arguing.
All of us need to call it out.
I'm thinking about the New York Times
doing a gauzy profile a few weeks ago
of this gamer, Hasan Piker, who regularly employs
awful genocidal rhetoric against Jewish people in the
Words. Right. Now if you actually listen, I
mean, I the in regard like, oh, you
know what? Actually, I'm thinking of the wrong
guy. I I what's the name you just
said? Employs
awful gyms doing a gauzy profile a few
weeks. Just need to call it out. I'm
thinking about the New York Times doing a
gauzy profile a few weeks ago of this
gamer, Hasan Piker, who Okay. I think that's
the guy's earring thing. I thought I thought
he said somebody else the first time I
heard that. The point regardless
is I'm not familiar with the guy they
were referencing, so I don't know. Maybe he's
out there screaming actual racist things. Either way,
guys, that's actually that's usually the best way
to make the point. It's still free speech.
Why is an Israeli
ADL
agent
rather or, you know, pretending to be pro
American out here screaming that we need to
suppress your speech? And how is any American
okay with that regardless of what direction it
takes? On top of that, we know as
a matter of fact that they people can
say free Palestine, and they want that to
stop under the same argument.
I don't know why this makes sense to
anybody who even remotely understands the rights. Legally
employs
awful genocidal rhetoric against Jewish people in the
Jewish state. Like, it Which is for your
speech. Streamists should not be empowered.
People who spout prejudice
should not be platformed.
This is a moment when we So by
that by that language then, that means not
Elon Musk. That means not Trump. That means
not Biden. That means never nobody. Because all
of them are screaming in one sense or
another
very clearly racist things.
Now, see, they don't care about all of
racism. They like racism. They just don't want
you to talk about Israel's crimes, which they
pretend are racism. To look ourselves in the
mirror and say, we've gotta stop this because
the consequences
are deadly. Right. So you can't say what
you want because they think that leads to
bad things.
Even if it does, it's your right. Now
here's the White House coming right out of
the gate yesterday.
Trump saying these horrible DC killings based obviously
on antisemitism.
How in the world that is the game?
That is the agenda. You don't know what
he he said free Palestine. For you to
push that means you're part of the agenda.
At the very least, pushing your personal opinion
is absolute fact, which is Trump one zero
one. Hatred and radicalism have no place in
The United States. Well, technically, hatred, radicalism, unless
you're ruining the law,
breaking the law, are you're right. You can
say it because they'll say radicalism is saying
free Palestine. You can hate whatever you want.
At what point do they start telling you
you're not allowed to hate things?
Isn't that just like the left? Ah, yes.
It is. But see, now it's the good
kind. We're fighting them with the right push
you know, whatever. How do you wanna frame
how stupid this is? We're doing it back
to them so we can center it back
to he'll bring all the rights back. Shut
up. You know? It's it's absurd.
So sad that such thing can happen. Yeah.
People being shot is always sad, but guess
what? There's already crimes for that. You can
already put them in jail. They'll they'll they'll
be in jail or he'll he'll be in
jail for the rest of his life.
Isn't that enough? Why do you have to
then cascade this into censoring other Americans for
things that are completely unrelated? Because you guys
are all part of the same game. Now
the White House shared it, put the same
thing out. So they are pushing this hard.
No surprise there. If you thought this would
be different, you're not paying attention. Well, here's
Waleed Shaheed pointing out what this Randy,
Fine said. You know, the guy who screamed,
bomb the kids. Like, most the most one
if not the, one of the most extremist
American politicians I've ever seen.
Just proudly
saying children should starve to death, keep them
starving, bombs away. People will show videos of
dead children. He goes, yes. Give me more.
That's not a joke.
He's done it more than once, and Trump
has endorsed him many times because he is
brazenly pro Zionist anti American. He won't say
that, but what he does is directly contradicting
contradicting American interest.
Here, he now says because they killed them,
we should nuke Gaza.
Pretty moderate. Right?
The matter is the Palestinian cause is an
evil one. Yeah. And congressman Wow.
Right. Palestinian cause is evil.
Think about that, guys. Really try to absorb
what he just said right there, that we're
talking about a cause for people who are
being genocided. People who are standing up for
people, whether even even if you think they're
wrong, who are driven by the need for
them to be kept to have self determination,
to have a life of their own, and
evil, he says. Why? Because he's a Zionist.
He does not agree with any of those
things with and that is anti American at
its core.
These people are dangerous, guys.
There is a, ceasefire deal on the table
right now that the White House is hoping
both Israel and Hamas will sign on to.
Does this shooting change anything when it comes
to the course of the war or the
negotiations to end it?
How much you wanna bet he's gonna say
that we should end it because they did
that? Well, I think it speaks to the
importance of the only end of the conflict
is complete and total surrender by those who
support Muslim terror. In World War two, we
did not negotiate a a surrender with the
Nazis. We did not negotiate a surrender with
the Japanese. We nuked the Japanese. This guy
is literally like one on one talking points
directly from the Israeli government. I'm not look
it up. Look at it. This might as
well be an interview with the Israeli ambassador.
Like, that it's it's exactly what they say.
One zero one, right out of the gate.
Twice in order to get unconditional surrender.
That needs to be the same here. There
is something deeply
is we nuked the Japanese twice Wow. In
order to get unconditional surrender. He's lying, by
the way, or he's as dumb as he
looks, which is the fact that they were
already in retreat when that happened. That's easy
to look up, in fact. That's become common
knowledge outside of government lies. They did it
in order to demonstrate that to the world
to probably just test it out. They were
in
retreat. But this doesn't matter to anybody who
cares about facts. That needs Oops. I said
that backwards, but it carries to only people
that care about facts. The the government clearly
does not. To be the same here. There
is something deeply, deeply
wrong
with this culture, and it needs to be
defeated. We heard in Brooks So however you
wanna feel about that, what he's telling you
is that you're not allowed to think these
things. If you wanna say certain things in
this country, you're no longer allowed because it
because whatever they think.
Is that American?
Is that somebody fighting for American interests or
somebody fighting to censor Americans against their interests?
Sure. You can piece that together.
These people are dangerous, and Trump has endorsed
him every single time.
Dan Bongino.
Last night's act of terror. Now it's terror.
Look. Crime, sure. Violence, terrorism.
Now everything they wanna make into something they
can abuse is terrorism. Why? Because that opens
the door to all sorts of national security
and unilateral actions, like an Alien Enemies Act
stuff, wherever direction they wanna take it in.
Terrorism.
It's just a it's like antisemitism. Now it's
meaningless because they'll they they'll say whatever they
want is terrorism because they may it's shocking.
It sounds bigger. They can use more things.
They get more resources. These people are
dangerous. And I mean your government, guys. It's
not left and right.
Last night's act of terror has the full
attention of your FBI, not the Epstein discussion.
Right? Not the mRNA, you know, great poisoning
Catherine calls it. Not any other conversation. JFK,
people that stole money during the last administration,
not Gates, not Fauci, not any of them,
not Biden. No. No. No. But we're gonna
go after Tesla people. We're gonna lie to
you about Jeffrey Epstein. Full attention given to
these people. What about everybody else?
These people are so selectively focused on anything
Israel na Israel related. It's disgusting. Targeted acts
of antisemitic violence are typically carried out by
spineless, gutless cowards.
It's just so funny to me. They have
so it's so clear they're trying to appease
something.
What do you think that is? Somebody's watching.
You know? Yeah. A a violent attack against
anybody is you could you could argue this.
Why an anti Semitic attack? They're so clearly
trying to make this case. Now look, again,
in case you missed the first point.
Nope. They if the people should be held
accountable for crime like this no matter what.
And just because these people are Israeli embassies
doesn't mean they're bad people. Doesn't mean they're
immediately people that you know, you don't know
is the point.
They could be people here who have the
same values as you. So it shouldn't be
immediately assumed that something is you know, there
are good good riddance or whatever. Can I
see the same kind of thing happening? And
I call that out too. Point is this
is him trying to use them.
That's what this is. And he says, and
the penalties will be harsh as we tighten
up this investigation and run down any additional
leads. I should have additional updates for you
shortly. Well, the I would imagine that the
penalties would be what they should be, right,
based on murder, or is it gonna be
something more, which is what I would expect.
And, yeah, or else pretend like he's gonna
run down anything. I'm pretty sure this guy's
not even in the loop, if you want
my honest opinion.
Here's the EPA because it makes total sense
for the EPA to speak up about anti
Semitic attacks. Right? And he says, I just
met with Sarah, and this is the EPA
account. Even though it says Lee Zeldin. It
says, I just met Sarah two weeks ago
in my office at EPA headquarters.
She struck me as a young woman filled
with life and positivity,
heartbroken to learn she was one of the
two tragically murdered last night by a Jew
hating radical screaming free Palestine
or somebody who was attacking Israelis because he
thought they were committing genocide against Palestine. For
you guys to force that into anything racial
and, of course, make it Jew hating,
rest in peace, which is sad. Because now
she's clearly being used by monsters like Lee
Zeldin and the rest. And that she got
killed in general. And anything that vile is
being committed and her family that suffers, yes.
It all matters.
But why in the world is the EPA
making this tweet? Why was she meeting with
him? What does that have to do with
anything? Something very strange is going on here,
guys.
Now Gen X girl just simply points out,
here's senator John Cronin, all of them, left
and right, couldn't race out fast enough to
make statements like this. The murder of the
Jewish couple working for Israel's embassy in DC
is abhorrent and is an attack on the
Jewish community.
It's an attack on people. For you guys
to force it into the Jewish discussion shows
you how desperate this is. The dust department
must immediately investigate how the suspect was radicalized,
what groups he was a part of, and
what foreign nation might be funding those attacks.
They are going to milk this dry.
Call this what it is, terrorism.
I'm sure that's what you're gonna work it
into. Probably some Iran influence or whatever you
guys wanna make it out to be based
on some intelligence report that we're not allowed
to see. Typical.
But her point is she's gonna organize all
their comments, I'm guessing, and and core coordinate
them, look back to her account.
Well, of course, the part that's not getting
discussed,
this is yesterday, the same day that all
happened. Netanyahu says Trump's ethnic cleansing plan is
a condition to end the war.
On Wednesday, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said
president Trump's plan, that is what he's calling
it, to remove Palestinian's population from Gaza was
a condition to end Israel's genocidal war on
the besieged territory.
Quote, I am prepared to end the war
on Gaza
under clear conditions that will ensure the safety
of Israel. All the hostages come come home,
which they already could have done many times
over. Hamas lays down its arms, which they
already offered to do, steps down from power,
which they've already offered to do. Its leadership
is dissolved from the strip. That's the only
thing they haven't offered to do.
That's ethnic cleansing regardless of what you think.
Because it's also it's everybody. All of them.
And Israel's been funding them, so that has
to be playing to your factor of how
this makes sense.
It says, Gaza's totally disarmed, and we carry
out the Trump plan. That's what he's calling
it. A plan that is so correct and
so revolutionary.
They just love to just pat each other
on the back. It's so funny.
So ethnic cleansing, total occupation. Gee. Doesn't that
sound like, oh, I don't know. Exactly what
all of us were telling you was the
day one plan and that we proved to
you with their own statements? Yeah. Funny how
we ended up in exactly this position. And
yet none of us will ever get credit
for pointing that out other until until Tucker
and Jones tell you they always knew and
they were right the whole time. It says
Trump has repeatedly called for removal of Gaza
and their population as part of the plan
for The US to take over the territory.
And as previously said, there would be no
right of return of Palestinians.
Well, they don't get the right to do
that. That's a
international law dynamic, but they don't care. Netanyahu's
comments on Wednesday marked the first time he
said the expulsion of Palestinian population was a
condition to end the war even though it's
been the day one point.
It's been clear since October 2023 that the
Israeli government wanted ethnic cleansing. They literally told
you if you weren't too dumb to pay
attention.
I shouldn't say it like that, but it's
frustrating, guys. It's been there from day one.
And Trump's calls have emboldened Netanyahu and other
officials to pursue a plan to carry it
out. It still remains unclear where the Palestinians
would go.
Netanyahu recently told the Knesset committee like their
congress that he lacks
that the lack of countries willing to take
them was the main problem
preventing immigration.
No. It's that they don't wanna leave, and
you're forcing them to. That's the problem. And
most of these countries
don't wanna be involved
with the ongoing issue that will clearly continue
because you guys are genocidal maniacs or the
fact that you're allowing them to displace them.
Netanyahu also vowed on Wednesday that Israel would
fully occupy Gaza.
I mean, even that right now, saying that
right now is insane. It's obviously illegal no
matter what you justify it with. All of
Gaza territories will be under Israeli security control,
he says, and Hamas will be totally defeated.
They'll never say that, by the way. There'll
always be an excuse. There'll always be something.
And the bottom line is that is illegal
occupation. It is right now, and it will
continue to be. We all told you this
was coming. The Israeli leader also said Israel
would set up a sterile zone,
a sterile zone in Southern Gaza for the
civilian population.
Israel find so they're literally
this is like final solution stuff, guys. They
are literally doing this in front of you.
They're starving to death. Fifty plus children have
dropped dead from starvation. They are continuing to
do this.
It's just you need to come to terms
with this and stop hiding from what this
is.
Smotrich,
because he lit the finance minister has said
that under Israel's plan for the current military
offensive, the civilian population would be literally
concentrated
into a tiny area of the South and
then pressured to leave Gaza. They're making fun
of you. You don't think that's they don't
think they accidentally said that, do you?
The Gazan citizens will be concentrated in the
South, he said. They will be totally despairing,
understanding
that there is no hope and nothing to
look for in Gaza.
It will be looking for relocation to begin
a new life in other places. So his
point is, we've made it so disgustingly bad
for them that they will have to leave,
And still yet, they don't want to because
they're resilient, and they refuse to bow to
your Zionist genocidal interest. But nobody cares.
I mean, we all care, but the power
structures that have anything to do anything about
don't care. They don't care that you care.
They don't care that you see it. Clearly,
something else is either more threatening,
more financially influential,
or more controlling.
I'm sure you know what I think that
is. But how do you not recognize that?
Everyone calls this out. Every human rights group,
every I mean, even the government's now starting
to shift tone. And yet, it still keeps
going, and they still keep funding them. Yeah.
They didn't stop.
It's just insanely clear.
I just hope people can start to find
the courage to call this out in a
real way.
Otherwise, they're gonna get what they want from
this.
I really, really hope that doesn't come to
pass.
Well, thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I will leave you with a clip
of this interview that we just had. It's
it's really it's, the the ending song
that Grant played for us.
Very talented musician. Grant Ellman interview, revolution through
music.
And he did a live performance on the
show. They played a song about Gaza, so
I thought it was fitting to play with
this to play this at the end. Please
listen to it. He's a he's an excellent
musician. All the links to his his information
will be in the link included in this
show. Support him. He does great work, and
he really does speak out about a lot
of important things. So I'll leave that with
you guys today. Thank you for tuning in.
Please please find the courage to speak up
about these things. Do your research.
Don't take claims at face value, whether it
be from this show or anybody else.
Find you know, you need to realize how
important it is to check these things and
to hold people to account even and most
importantly those that you support.
Just today, I think more than anything, they're
taking advantage of people's willingness to want to
see the best in anybody because we've had
so many bad people in a row. Like,
I mean, that's the kind of the game.
It's becoming worse and worse and stupider and
stupider, and then they keep getting lesser and
lesser of evil. And the bottom line is
they just people feel almost obligated to just
stand with their choice because, well, they would
have been worse. Well, no. It all would
have been worse. I mean, every single day,
we're seeing how much worse they can get
until we find the courage to stand up
and say not anymore. We're not gonna allow
the game to continue. We're gonna do something
to stop it. Whatever that means to you.
I've got plenty of ideas. All I need
is people to begin to be motivated to
do something about it. As always, guys, the
point come down to, you know, the first
step is even acknowledging that we have a
problem. And right now, we can't even agree
on that from left and right. So until
we can get past that point, at least
the majority,
and acknowledge what the problem really is, we're
not gonna begin to even start to solve
it. We need to get there. Help people
see this, break this out, have conversations, start
new groups,
find it.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay stay vigilant.
Song's called Sing and Pray.
I wish the week ahead and the war
today.
Sing and pray for all the lives that
we've lost.
I wish that we could end the war
today. But for now the highest action is
to sing and pray. You may have to
sing and pray for all the lives that
have been lost, singing and praying.
Historically, the worst atrocities committed by humanity always
stand under the illusion of authority when individuals
abdicate a personal responsibility.
Carrying out hateful orders commanded by a state,
you know. Authority is immoral when people blind
to follow orders instead of conscience. Always leads
the horrors like the genocides committed on the
countless regimes. Bolsheviks and Soviets and Mao is
Chinese.
Iraq drone bomber, Obama get a Nobel Peace
Prize, fight more violence than any other to
take the Oval Office. Ironic, but the real
problem is the camel costing war to fall.
At worst, the politicians call their dogs. State
of Israel doing the same and it's making
minoches. Call it a war, but in reality,
it's just a slaughter. Netanyahu got his dogs
out and we had better stop from violations
of natural law office, the judgments of God.
Wish that we could end the war today.
But for now, the highest action is to
sing and pray. They got to sing and
pray for all the lives that we've lost.
Singing and praying for sacred lives that we
got dead. I wish that we could end
the war today, but for now the highest
action is to sing and pray. We got
to sing and pray for all the lives
that we've lost. Singing and praying.
Yeah. I'm so tired of terrorist media mongering
machines telling us to pick a side. Invest
in their schemes, they lie to divide. Paralyze
a state of defeat. The only sign to
choose is whether you pro war or you
pro peace. That's what I'm sending to Palestine.
The people in need as bombs raining down
on innocent civilians, they bleed. All this popping
white phosphorus dropping. Gaza cannot be seen, no
sign. Hostages that Hamas are sensibly holding their
bomb the hospital. Death tolls exploding every day.
Ten thousand, fifteen thousand.
Is what they say. It's a genocide. Zionist
always pointing the finger of blame. Claiming they
are the victim once again. And version the
name of the game. Enough for the hate.
Murderous ways. Gather your faith. Won't take the
bait. Walking in peace. We're living peace. And
we demanding peace today. We're walkin' livin' and
we demandin' peace today. We're walkin' peace, we're
livin' peace, and we demandin' peace today.
Wish the weekend and the war today, but
for now the highest action is to sing
and pray. We got to sing and pray
for all the lives that we've lost. Singing
and praying for sacred lives that we've got.
Yes. I wish the weekend and the war
today. But for now, the highest action is
to sing and pray. We got to sing
and pray for all the lives that we've
lost. Singing and praying for sacred lives that
we got. Yes.
Sing and pray for all the lives that
we've lost.
I wish the week could end the war
today. Yeah. But for now, the highest action
is to sing and pray. We got to
sing and pray for all the lives that
we've lost. Singing and praying for sacred lives
that we've gone yet.
Yeah. Thanks again for having me. My name
is Grant Presents. Thanks again, Ryan Christian, Last
American Vagabond. Really stoked to be here. Grateful.
Sing and pray for Palestine. Much love y'all.