We should be having a public dialogue, and
it should be something that rises to the
level of legislation. We should not allow the
National Institutes of Health or the Department of
Defense
to allocate funding to amplify these agents
so that, allegedly, we can study them in
the case that they fall into the hands
of bad people. Because the evidence
has shown us
that the bad people who actually have unleashed
these pathogens
since 1991
And by the way, if you go to
miscellaneous memorandum seven and other documents, we can
go back to the nineteen fifties.
The bad people who unleashed these things on
the population
are us.
It is The US who's doing it.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Friday, May ninth twenty twenty five, and I
am not going to forget to use the
new intro tomorrow.
I keep forgetting every single day to use
the new amazing intro that was made for
us, and I just there's so much going
on that I lose that. Thank you for
tuning in today. Right out of the gate,
let me know if there's any audio differences.
There's some new things in the background. Just
let me know if there's anything that stands
out as good, bad, otherwise, especially if you
can't hear me. So thank you for tuning
in today. I have some important things that
I wanted to follow-up on. I will be
doing a show tomorrow, so I'm gonna be
getting into more around the,
constitutional issues, the immigration overlaps, foreign policy for
the most part tomorrow. So make sure you
tune into that. Today, we're gonna be focusing
on a few important follow ups.
Well, I I mean, really, a lot of
the stuff we discussed have been follow ups
since we've been covering this stuff for such
a long time.
But interesting developments, let's say, around, for example,
the Epstein list conversation that I think is
important to reiterate and how that's continued to
you know, the just the ongoing manipulation around
it. I wanna make sure we start with
the conversation of gain of function because this
is a very important central conversation
for, I think, a lot of the people
in the political sphere today, I think, were
kind of
shaken free
from the previous
construct, if you will, because of a lot
of impossible things to ignore around the COVID
nineteen illusion.
So a lot of people are, you know,
kind of are
picking up on the fly around a lot
of the new things, some of the things
we've been talking about for a very long
time.
My point is that's a very influential and
important conversation. And so to see what happened
with the Donald Trump administration,
just again, the the the current iteration of
The US Government and RFK Jr involved with
the Maha overlap, I think, is very important
because,
yet again, it is being egregiously misrepresented
and not in some
you know, I don't even really see
let's put it this way.
This could
the executive order around gain of function that
Donald Trump recently put out, which we'll talk
about to start.
Maybe there could be some positive steps to
this. Maybe it's one step in a long
series of positive steps that will bring it
to an official end. I certainly hope so.
To argue now that it has stopped is
simply not true. Just easily, it will go
right through the executive order, and weird that
a lot of people are making that case
with Children's Health Defense. They didn't ending gain
of function. It's not what's happening. And maybe
they meant to make it more broad, and
they have more the bottom line is it's
not actually what happened.
But if you dive into it more, it
becomes very clear,
especially with what you know they're currently involved
in, mRNA platform, Stargate, all sorts of things
that overlap with, in particular, gain of function
research, and, of course, EPPP, if we wanna
get into the nuance that Vauci brought to
the table.
Obviously, the where it's what what they've already
done shows you that I don't think they
mean what's happening here. At the very least,
it gives people the the the ammunition to
argue that this is,
you know, a promise kept, let's say. And
I just don't think that's what's happening. And
it's not about raining on the parade or
trying to go against anything. It's about the
truth, and it's about what we can prove.
And I think it matters more than anything
around something like this
that everybody's against. And I mean, like, even
even during the COVID nineteen conversation to understand
what gain of function was and how long
even the periods where it wasn't supposed to
be happening and it was, which we'll cover
again today, it's very obvious that everyone is
involved from left to right
far back as you wanna look. And, you
know, since it's been possible. And we're also
gonna get into today an important overlap to
the
it's the biometric
surveillance discussion. But something that's been going on,
I think, since around 02/2018,
really got focused in 02/2022,
but it's gotten a back seat. Taken a
back seat because of for many reasons.
But it's about,
I guess,
a direction,
a platform, something they're building out called Hart,
h a r t. And it is a
very alarming discussion that's been there for a
while. But what I wanna cover today is
one that it's giving it's giving it it's
being given a jump start, a supercharge, as
the article puts it. But in particular around
why that's happening today, the xAI
Palantir
surveillance kind of just
centralization that's going on in the most alarming
way I've seen in my ever doing this,
and it and and now bringing this back
into the fold and showing you what it's
really always been about. As one of the
people point to makes the argument that Maha
itself was just an effort to get people
to, you know, a head fake, as the
title points out, for something else, to get
you to think this is gonna happen,
but then ultimately driving you into where we
are now. And all I hope for is
people that you're willing to ask these questions,
that you're willing to consider the alternative even
if it goes against what you want or
what you think is supposed to happen. And,
of course, we'll start with a a nod
to a great article Derek wrote that talks
something somewhat about this idea of doing your
own research.
Before we get into anything else, I wanted
to make sure we shout this out to,
the the Big Frog and Ryan and Big
Frog and the great work they're doing there.
They're like, they'll we they will be our
only new T shirt company once,
true Truth Clothing, which they are on the
decline, goes away. Now they they ultimately decided
to wind down what they're doing. I think
they're just kind of shifting in life where
they want to go, kind of away from
the media sphere, at least at least with
the shop.
Still think that, you know, you know, good
terms is my point. There's no negativity there.
It's really just that they decided to wind
down the t shirt shop. And so you
can still get discounted t shirts on there.
The link is right at the top of
the website.
But the the difference here is there's two
one or two things. This will be the
place to go going forward, and we do
have all the old different versions. Some of
them slightly different for obvious reasons.
The point, though, is that this was where
you can get them now, normal price, at
least as this website will have them. And
that will give TLav and and the TLav
platform the most
support.
Now you can't get the discounted ones until
they run out of them on Truth Clothing.
That just doesn't help TLav as much. Nonetheless,
it's if you why not get the discounted
versions while they're still still there? But if
you're looking to support us the most in
regard to buying a t shirt or supporting,
this would be the way to go. And,
of course, we also have on here the
ones we've been showing before, question everything and
so on. We also and and the bag
one one, but also the ones we added
on the other store, which is the free
speech absolutist t shirt,
the the, you know, they, the hierarchy enslaving
you, as well as a Latin shirt that
I think they just recently put on.
Really, it's and and the stickers,
the Latin shirt was the one we recently
added.
And, the the basically, the truth conquers all
was the was what the Latin phrase was.
And so this is a great place for
you to support TLF
because it gets you something you can wear
and so on, and I just wanted to
shout that out as well because, you know,
we're definitely needed some support right now more
than we have in a long time. So
I wanna make sure you saw that. I
also want to highlight the number again that
we recently at I recently restarted because that
we since we've moved, I lost the number
for the office.
So this number I'll include. I just added
to the contact page, which is (615) 751-4115.
It is on silence, but, ultimately, you can
leave a message at the at the office,
and I will check that regular regularly if
there's other ways you can't get a hold
of me. And on that note, I mean,
I know guys, trust me, you you guys
reach out about the contact form and how
it doesn't work, and half the time, I
don't think I get them from you. Or
even my emails, the same thing. You know,
so I'm just trying to find more ways
to help you guys get in contact with
me. And then to be fair and clear,
there's sometimes people reach out that I don't
respond for plenty of reasons. So don't think
it's just always being missed. But if you
wanna reach us there and, really, don't expect
me to get back to you. There's a
lot going on, but I might. And, ultimately,
just leave me information if you think it's
important or, you know,
words of
encouragement. Also
oops. I had something else there. Did I
just close that? Oh, yeah. That I was
just gonna say, if just since we're talking
about supports to start and Bitcoin seem to
be doing well, here is our donation page
for Bitcoin, either the QR code, which I
recommend you don't use, or the actual numbers
on there, which is public, which you guys
can check. It's always been public for everyone
to see. We really haven't got that much
through here, so maybe you can change that.
At the top, you notice we have everything
else too, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, or Subscribestar, Cash
App, just direct donate to the website, all
sorts of stuff. Definitely could use your support.
Now
starting
ultimately starting on some,
updates,
couple points I wanted you to see, or
rather follow ups that I wanted you to
see from last show and so on, just
in case you missed it. I mean, I
found this to be monumentally important, and there's
a lot of coverage. DropSiteNews did amazing work
on this. But just in case you hadn't
seen how incredible this is, because I think
a lot of people got kinda stopped short
at the signal
discussion
and and really the idea being sort of
like, oops. They got caught using signal chats,
which was a part of it, I guess.
But at least those are encrypted to some
degree. And I I don't, you know, trust
me. I don't think anything is really that
private today. But it was more so about
the second part of the story, which was
they they got hacked
because Waltz was using an Israeli
tech that basically archived the signal messages and
stored it in Israel. And gay, then they
got hacked. And it's it's
it's two those are two different story. Well,
they're the same story as far as I'm
concerned, but those are two stories. And realize
how insane it is that you have an
they can't stop talking about national security half
the time when they don't even mean that
when they're pointing at something they wanna stop.
In this case, you've got a person who
is a wild Zionist who's literally using Israeli
infiltration tech that allows the Israeli government to
it's it's run by unit eighty two hundred
intelligence, and they are literally able to look
at the inner internal dialogue of the White
House. I wouldn't be surprised if they're all
well aware of that, quite frankly. Nonetheless,
the state department revealed to be using Israeli
intelligence link chat app involved in the Trump
hack.
It's it's just wild how such a how
that story should be literally everywhere and it's
not.
Now Derek put out an amazing article today,
In Defense of Doing Your Own Research. Now
this starts because, well, a lot of things
have been going on around this topic for
a long time. You can go back to
the WikiLeaks point where I think it was
Chris Cuomo that basically said, you know, you
don't you're not allowed to look at this
stuff. You need to look at us and
we'll tell you what it says, you know,
paraphrasing,
which is just absolutely wild that he ever
that he wasn't
aware enough to be like, I'm never gonna
say that because that's the stupidest thing I've
ever heard. But, nope, he did it because
that's what they all do. But there's many
other examples of this. Right? We've talked about
this during the COVID nineteen time frame, and
they play this game where,
basically, the idea that you're not allowed to
do your own research because you're not smart
enough to understand, which is usually the the
square one, as if you're not capable of
learning things then and becoming better at what
you do. No. No. Just listen to what
we tell you. But then the point they
make in in this back and forth that
he covers
is the ultimate point of, like, well, you're
you're allowed you know, you should be looking
at information, but you have to, you know,
make sure you look to them.
The overarching point in all of this is
that they act like you're somehow incapable of
finding a middle ground, where you either go
so far to one side where all research
and doctors and everything official is completely fake
and I'm only gonna look at what my
blog says.
I don't even I don't I think I
know few people in that field than anything
else. I mean, anything else. Whatever imaginary field
that is.
Most people
are never of the mind that they're doing
that. No. They could accidentally be doing that,
but they think they're looking too sour. So
this game they play where people are, like,
choosing to just look at what the blog
said and ignore any other data points, that
does exist, but it is a minority in
the conversation.
The point is about people who get trapped
in bad sources of information. And not not
just the blog, but, like, people that are
looking into it, but they go with narratives
versus,
I don't know, well sourced information. The problem,
though, is rather, the point is that most
people, I argue,
are doing their best to try to find
their way through all this, and they ignore
the fact that, yes, they can lie to
you. That does happen. Or they could be
wrong or they could be influenced by pharma
or whatever else. And it's just the thing
is it's almost childish that they must be
aware of that very clear nuance. I think
it comes down to the fact they just
don't want you being
able
or
willing
to do your own research and then also
knowing new information that can clearly change the
way you see things. Well written, important article.
One of the things he goes over, which
is why one of the other reasons I
wanted to highlight is about the AI overlap,
which we're gonna be talking about, I think,
on a new panel coming up. But it's
an interesting thought about, you know, people who
are now just kind of outsourcing their investigation
to an AI. Now I've used it on
the show, and I'll make a point about
this in a second. But as always, as
I say every time, it's not something that
we're relying on. It is a secondary point
usually with Grok to say, see, even your
Grok says that, or to just back it
up with something that's easy to point to,
but never
ever from T Lab or and I I
would argue anybody in the IMEI are relying
on that as the source.
That's simply a secondary, like, what are the
ages or the dates or you know, and
then confirming this independently because AIs are wrong
all the time.
The problem is that people are being convinced,
like with Google Maps, that they don't have
to do this anymore.
Ask a ask a younger kid how to
use a map,
a lot of them are lost. And that's
incredible. Or even just direction, knowing how to
get around your own town half the time,
people are lost because they've outsourced that to
something else.
It's the same thing we've done with a
lot of different technological advancements.
So the conversation is twofold about whether or
not this is, you know, about trying to
outsource that or just simply people over relying
on it or trusting that it is the
truth. And then in in a couple of
different variations within that part, whether they're using
that to lie to you. Right? Inputting bad
data and so on. It's a very interesting
conversation. So we'll be talking about that soon.
And, again, I'll make a couple points about
my framing of it today, about how it
is it can be used. And I even
made a point the other day about how
I got frustrated that even that even even
using grok as a counterpoint to try to
show them that that's I I'm mad that
I even got pulled into that. I'm very
resistant to it all. But I know there
are benefits to it, and so it's important
to try to open, you know, in the
sense of counterbalance,
even just rapid research, but always always
check what you're doing outside of I mean,
you that should be with any source. Even
if it's directly from a source, a prime
source, you should also confirm it with something
else. Had a great interview with Brooke Jackson
titled meet the new boss, same as the
old boss. And that is basically exactly her
sentiment in regard to, as she pointed on
Twitter, Trump sides with Pfizer. So if you
haven't seen it, I think it's really important
to understand that this is not going in
a positive direction as I think we're
aware with Stargate and MMR shots, which we
touch on in the show. Or at the
end of this interview, we touch on the
gain of function because it happened that day.
The executive order and where that goes, we'll
go through that in in detail today.
But important to understand that she's very aware
of where this is and very aware that
that current administration and the Trump DOJ are
siding with Pfizer. And they're saying that the
shots are safe and effective. We'll make cool
points about that in this first segment.
But on that note,
I wanted to show you one quick thing
that I showed her after the show. Very
strange, actually.
Well, I shouldn't say strange. It's actually very
common, but it's interesting
that while I was on the show with
her,
you could see here that it I would
load the page,
and it would go away. It would so
it would show that I wasn't following her.
Now that's how that sometimes happens, right, where
you click it and then it kinda but,
no. This no matter what I did, no
matter how many times I clicked it, no
matter how many times they were fresh, it
would always revert back to not following her.
Now I believe that's because of certain people.
I think Brooke Jackson is somebody who is
very inconvenient,
made exponentially more problematic that she's not partisan
or at least willing to call out any
side if they don't go along with what
should be happening, you know, what's the right
thing or acknowledging the in monumental amount of
evidence that she's produced showing you that Pfizer
and Ventavia
and the administer the US government are aware.
Her lawsuit right now is not against left
or right or Ventavia or it's it's Brooke
Jackson versus the US government.
She deserves a lot of respect, and and
she think of the courage for that. But,
anyway, I wanted to point that out because
Twitter is absolutely still doing stuff like that.
That shouldn't be new to anybody.
Now to talk about
the gain of function point. Because, obviously, this
overlaps. Right? I mean, we not only do
we touch it in the interview, but, guys,
let's be real about this. Gain of function
I mean, do you realize that the entire
dynamic that we're talking about with the mRNA
platform, what we're discussing, the way they got
there is using gain of function? It's about
manipulating these the
the pathogen,
you know, whatever we're dealing with, to either
and, technically,
gain or loss because there are there's loss
of function too, but adding so it can
be more infectious,
spread longer, you know, that kind of stuff.
You can spray you know, to be able
to last longer, you know, or or be
aerosolized or or airborne. Like, these are things
that they have tried to do in the
past under the guise that they could find
something worse and make a vaccine for it.
And just in case, we've got that vaccine
for something that one in a billion happens
where somebody out there in a cave makes
exactly the thing that we just secretly made
in our lab. It's insanely stupid and people
have called it out for the longest time,
but the point is it's built and built
and built. And I'm gonna play some clips
for you. I'll play what they say right
here.
And I'll I'll I'll stop it a couple
of times because you have to point out
that they're wrong. Even what RFK Jr says
about when they didn't do gain of function
two two two
excuse me, 02/2002.
You could listen to doctor David Martin, doctor
Francis Boyle, I mean, and you could look
it up for yourself. That's simply not true.
Now, they
didn't publicly do this, but it's the same
point we're gonna make going through this, especially
with the different term the terms they're using.
As if somehow by saying, you know, only
the dangerous ones or only the federally funded
ones or only ones in foreign areas. It's
just another game. I certainly hope I'm wrong,
but history shows us that we're not. And
Trump's last administration was a part of this
like anybody else.
So let's play this first clip,
and then we'll go over, I think, what
the reality is of this. And I think
the point that I'm making, just so it's
clear, is that this is not actually what's
happening. We'll go over the executive order itself,
but here's doctor Robert Malone. Finally, thank you,
mister president.
Trump's health defense says, historic breakthrough news. Trump
ends
gain of function research in The United States.
Now what's wild about that statement,
one, he very clearly does not end it
in any sense. It's you'll I'll read it
for you on the show. But to say
in The US is a I don't under
I whether they didn't read it or because
the clear the clear point is about foreign
bad guy stuff.
Right? That's what it's not about The US,
and I'll read it through you for myself
for, re read it we'll read through it
together. And so what I find so strange
is that they either didn't read it or
they're lying for it. I don't I don't
know. I don't wanna put I don't wanna
assume. I think people get a little bit
excited about things they want to see.
It's just about what you can prove and
what's correct. So let's watch this clip first.
And and it's worth the end of gain
of function
research funding by the federal government and also
controls
by private corporations on gain of function studies.
This was a kind of study that was
engaged in by The United States Military and
intelligence agencies
beginning in 1947.
By 1969,
the CIA said that they had reached nuclear
equivalency, that they could kill the entire US
population
for twenty nine cents per person.
That year, president Nixon went to Fort Detrick
and announced a unilateral and
to this kind of research. What I know
this is low, so I'll try not to
jump in too much.
Just remember, he's talking about Fort Detrick. He's
talking about how long it's been going on.
So just because it like,
realize how long people like us and others
have been calling this stuff out. During Trump's
last administration, and they called you crazy.
Now Trump and the rest of it, they
called they they pushed back on this stuff.
Okay? So as he's sitting there with this
weird kind of noninterest with what's going on,
ask yourself why it makes sense for them
to then present this as something they're exposing
when they've played a part in doing it.
All of them have. Now to to the
the the usual point, well, isn't it still
good that they're doing? Yes. Yes.
Always.
But as long as you're able to understand
that people it's like the murderer calling out
people who were involved in the murder.
And then you go, good. They called out
the murderers. Arrest them. But okay. What about
the murderer? He's also a murder. He's also
part of the murder. How is that chain?
Well, ah, they called it out. Okay. So
you're just invalidating their crimes too because they
called out the others? I mean, you gotta
recognize how weird that is. That's one part
of it. Second is that we don't even
really know that this is gonna end up
being what they claim it is, and I'll
go through why.
But you have to realize that this is
a game, and we've caught them many times
already doing this.
So just remember that how much they're all
immersed in this.
Called dual use research. Research that was for
vaccination
and also for military
purposes. He then persuaded over a 80
countries to sign the bio evidence charter in
1973.
That
basically
ended in a puncture research around the globe
until 02/2002.
That's insane.
Like, you can do your own research as
much I recommend you do as always.
That's just absolutely insane. You can quite literally
prove the US government's been doing this pretty
much on I mean, this is a this
is doctor Boyle made clear right in the
beginning of this. But also the fact that
around the world are we serious?
I just don't even know. I I think
this is about creating a very easy to
digest narrative, and maybe you he did say
basically, so you can give him some air
in the room and say, well, there but
I don't think it's about some fringe tiny
minority, guys. I think you can clearly show
that they did this to basically hide that
ongoing research. That's my personal opinion. And I
think you can go back well, I say
that because there's parts of it that are
up in the air. But let's be real.
There is undeniable evidence that did happen, and
that's why he didn't say completely. But but
I don't think it's a small fraction. I
think it's actually the main discussion.
You can ask I mean, look. The reality
is by kinda papering over that, it does
kinda hide a lot of the ongoing awareness
that they were aware of and we were
screaming about right at the beginning of the
COVID nineteen conversation or well before that. Right?
So realize all of this had been continuing.
The funding of Chinese research happened during Trump's
administration. And even when he stepped up to
try to end the Wuhan lab, I keep
telling you this when I said it back
then, he stopped that, but at the same
time, there was, like, four other projects or
or I think it was more than that
that were doing the exact same research that
they didn't stop.
So it's all it's always been a shell
game. It's always been a mirage. And this
is what people like doctor Martin and the
rest will tell you because they do not
shy away from telling you that it is
nonpartisan
and they're all involved. Despite when you go
on certain partisan shows, they do their best
to frame it opposite. But if you listen
to him, watch your interview, he's very clear.
Trump, Biden, all of them, they're all involved.
Or 02/2001
after the anthrax attacks,
we passed the Patriot Act, and the Patriot
Act had a provision, a little known provision
in it.
That said that although the bioweapons charter is
still in a is still in effect, and
the Geneva Convention is still in effect,
US Federal Officials who violate it cannot be
prosecuted.
So in case you didn't hear that, he
simply said that once the Patriot Act happened,
you know, after the anthrax attack, that totally
had nothing to do with the game of
function. Right? We're totally not even talking about
the ongoing weaponization of anthrax that was tied
back to Fort Detrick that happened before that.
Right? But 02/2002 after that, he's telling you,
the Patriot Act added another area where it
said they if they what was exact framing?
It is still in a is still in
a fact, and the Geneva Convention is still
in a fact.
US Federal Officials who violate it cannot be
processed. You so, basically, which how do you
even pass something like that? That okay. So
we'll just write this in that if we
do it, it's not a crime? Yeah. That's
pretty much the always go to for the
US government. So it's not new. Trump's doing
it right now. Very Nixon of him. Right?
You know, if I do it, it's not
a crime. It's kind of the old sentiment.
I just realized that that it's that didn't
really change other than just writing in. So
what you can see, in my opinion, is
the progression
of the ongoing agenda that now becomes more
and more important. So now they need to
and they get more corrupt and more brazen,
they write in the Patriot Act because that
was a wild time that they could just
do whatever they want.
And so, again, that he they cannot be
prosecuted for what I think you can prove
they've always been doing. In case you missed
me quickly saying that, the point of the
anthrax
attack, Whitney and I have talked about this,
The it's it's very clear that this was
something that they were working on well before
that. So the anthrax attack wasn't the impetus
for why they did this, and then they
started doing it. It was already going on.
You could prove that. They made that. It
tied back to Fort Detrick in the first
place.
And that relaunched
bioweapons
arms race, and that was driven by gain
of function research.
In 2014,
'3 of those bugs escaped from US labs,
and
president Obama declared a moratorium
on future use. And instead Which didn't which
didn't stop.
As I said last time, well before this,
during COVID nineteen, they did that, and then
it continued, and you can prove that. And
it was well more than three bugs that
got slipped out of Fort Detrick. We told
you that many times in the past as
well. So this is a very cultivated narrative,
but it's easier to digest.
A lot of that research was moved offshore
to the Wuhan lab.
Right. So the US government moved its research
over to Wuhan.
Right? And that continued all the way through
Trump's administration. But just the only reason I'm
saying that is for those that are trying
to carve out one end to element. Understand
my belief, and and you can prove it,
is that it's not left and right. It's
all of it. It's the US government. They've
been doing this and handing the baton back
and forth for a long time.
That's the only reason I'm framing it like
that. It's not partisan. But recognize that they
continued this same dynamic. It's left and right.
They're all doing the same thing. And now
I argue the reason this is shifting,
one, is because this is trying to convince
you that it's not happening anymore even though
it is, as well as the fact that
I think they're on a different plane right
now, like, level with what they're working on.
On top of that, I get the sense
that something is actually coming. Like, the way
all these different points that have happened recently,
it worries me that there is at least
a narrative coming your way soon. We'll find
out. I'm sure.
We have an it launched bioweapons arms race
all around the country,
all around the world so that China
is engaged in it, developing all kinds of
weapons using AI and CRISPR technologies that are
really devastating
Russia. Exactly like they're doing right now. Don't
miss how incredible that is. Right? Literally using
AI to manufacture
exact it's the same exact thing. So let's
be real. If we're talking about the Stargate
program and we understand that the COVID nineteen
injection was a bio weapon conversation,
then are we missing something?
It's the same
conversation. And CRISPR and the same thing that's
exactly this is not a unique to China
bad guy problem, guys.
Just like most of the problems we've seen
in the past, it originates here.
Deeply engaged
in Iran and many other countries.
It's it's a kind of weapon that always
has blowback.
There's always bad news. Mhmm. And the Okay.
So just to be clear, it's kind of
weapon that always has blowback.
Always, he says. So when we go next
and prove to you that they're still doing
that, make sense of that for me. If
there's always blowback, then why wouldn't it be
absolute no more gain of function that we
are literally stopping every single kind we're making
it illegal like they pretend they did before?
It's a good question.
Justification
for this kind of weaponry
was and these kind of research was always
that we have to do this,
develop vaccines to
to counter a future pandemic.
He has expressed that that's stupid in the
past. So it's funny that he frames now
he's he's telling you their narrative, but very
clearly could have made it more specific to
say that that's asinine, to argue that we're
ever making an injection for something only we
made secretly in a lab in case somebody
else magically makes the same thing.
The the %
chance. It's it's about you creating a dangerous
thing that you have the antidote for or
not or however you wanna look at it.
In all of the history of bio
of antifunction research,
we can't point to a single good thing
that's come from it. I agree with that.
Okay. So if there hasn't been a single
good thing, why is it still continuing? Despite
the screaming narrative of the partisans who are
wrong,
it is continuing. So how do you make
sense of that? And today, I commend
president Trump for his courage and his vision
in ending US bioweapons
research.
Alright. So he ends by saying that. He
ends by saying, thank you him for ending
this research. Okay.
We'll we'll we'll go through it. Now, by
the way, it does look so Rumble's been
having problems all day. It looks like it's
up for me, but I I almost wasn't
able to get it to to
work today. So just a heads up on
there. You might wanna check Odysee or other
channels we're using.
So
here is the first thing I posted when
I just, you know, looked at the executive
order for myself, you know, like so few
tend to do. As Kelly Neal says, I
wish more of the Trump faithful looked beyond
happy headlines and actually read these foolishly lauded
executive orders.
Quote, if wishes were horses. Right? It says
Tom Rens makes a valid point regarding the
continuation of gain of function research. He's one
of the few that called out. Here
was what I just said. So in regard
to that post, I said, you know, children's
health defense saying it ends gain of function
for in The US. I said, except that's
not what happened. And I simply tagged this,
which was Luther Cyrus saying, the executive order
includes provisions, by the way, because I looked
into it as well and it's clear, that
gain of function research to continue in The
United States under stricter oversight, or so they
tell you.
Like, look. Yes. Is stricter oversight a positive
and small step? Well, I guess. But if
it's it's like saying a better step in
regard to the the you know? I mean,
I'm trying to make gain of function, as
he just said, has never yielded positive results.
So why do we keep wanting it but
with harsher oversight? It just it doesn't logically
make sense.
That's why they then said he ended it,
and I think that's in a very carefully
con constructed narrative.
Provided adheres to new safety and transparency guidelines.
Okay. So you're now gonna be transparent and
and have guidelines for safety around the deadly
wet bio weapon creating function.
It emphasizes maintaining US innovation and readiness against
biological threats. So we're even using the same
narrative
that we need to make dangerous things to
prepare for the dangerous things they might also
make exactly the same way if they just
happen to be psychic.
They've made fun of these in the past
in the same way.
Now the point is it's not true.
Thank you. Glad he was pointing this out
early.
And and this
is nod back to the point that Derek
was making. So this is something we read
through the executive order. We looked through the
information. We checked with other people's opinions online.
We looked at other experts. You know, the
whole field, none of which should
all of which should be considered. And you
can come to your conclusion about what the
data shows, the evidence shows. And because someone
is an expert, maybe you think that way.
The point is it's just data points that
you should verify.
Simple. The idea that a white lab coat
somehow has more impact. Now, yes, they might
have more insight in the conversation, so maybe
you can read that first. But you compare
the information and you look for yourself.
So it's it's just so interesting how people
tend to weight these things and ignore other
information because they choose to, and that gets
played against you. The point is, just because
Grock says something does not make it so.
But it's interesting, I point out, that people
tend to want to hear what it says
more because they think it's a conservative thing.
So it's worth using, but make sure you're
checking out for yourself what the information shows.
And I said, as usual, partisans are being
manipulated. Here's what Brock says. And this is
Luther asking this for a very clear reason
because they're all saying, it's a lie. RFK
Jr. Just said a whole speech yesterday. Okay.
So this person says,
you're wrong. RFK just told me this.
See how this works? And Luther just goes,
okay, Grock. Will gain of function research continue
in The United States? And it says, gain
of function research in The US is not
fully banned but faces stricter limits.
Okay.
Again, I'm not gonna argue that may like
I said in the beginning, in case you
didn't hear it, maybe this is a sync
a a series of steps, which I already
promise you is being argued online whether they
know that or not, cause it's easier to
feel that way and maybe you're right but
you don't know cause nobody's making that allegation
that it's gonna go incremental, right? Then we're
gonna have a little bit more restriction then
next week it'll be a little bit more
and hey, you know what? If it ends,
I will cheer it on. Until then, I
will make the same point. Why would you
keep using a deadly dangerous thing if you
just told us it doesn't have any positive
outcome? Sort of like Trump telling you the
shots are safe and effective or by
Brooke Jackson telling you and showing you with
her own information that they're siding with Pfizer
and telling and telling you, the DOJ, that
their information shows that you can't see that
it's safe and effective,
still. Or MMR shots or Stargate or any
number of things.
But it goes on to explain the same
thing we'll just read for you right now,
that the executive order suspends federally funded,
dangerous, even Crock points that out, chain of
function research. Okay. So what if they deem
it one that's not dangerous?
These things matter.
That's just a subjective term they use. So
if they were gonna make it about gain
of function, they would've just used gain of
function, not dangerous gain of function. I'll show
you that point. But it goes on to
say it ends funding forced work in such
countries like China.
So the US government funding gain of function
research in China should be a huge issue,
but they're just gonna say we're gonna stop
funding them. So, basically, your your report is
the US government's gonna stop doing all those
things.
But making it about China, I mean, they're
just as problematic because they're all working on
it, but think about how interesting that is.
Again, just to save time, we'll we'll jump
to the actual order because he goes over
all the stuff we're gonna show you.
Before we get there,
this is just somebody else. Oh, this is
the the new Elon Musk, Groklin Rust.
Apparently you know, because what's funny is if
you do those things on Twitter, you get,
like, this weird suspension time frame, and you
you can't like, it's just you're not them.
You know? Because they I guess you own
it. You can do what you want. But
he goes, this is great. No more funding
research that kills millions of people.
That's what he says. That's Elon Musk. The
real name for gain of function is death
maximization.
That's what Fauci was actually very think about
what he just said.
If you listen to he he if the
information already shows you that they are continuing
this, and he's telling you that they
basically showing you exactly what we're talking about.
So if what Elon is saying, which I
agree with, is the case, then why would
they continue it at all?
And I said, except that's clearly not what's
happening. Here's Grok telling you you're wrong, Elon
Musk. But, see, guys, I don't think these
are accidents. I think they know that they're
lying to you in very specific particular ways.
I said, are you deliberately lying or just
this easy to fool? Common sense is not
not so common says, they did not ban
gain of function in it funding in general.
They just did just the federal fund excuse
me. Federal funding.
So Bill Gates can get USAID money, launder
it, and then privately fund gain of function.
It's all posturing and a joke, which is
one of the many possible
sidesteps because they didn't stop it.
Or whatever money you wanna talk about. Let's
not forget. Gates met with Trump in the
beginning of the administration more than once. They
had great meetings. They talked about continuing the
vaccine discussion, and then Stargate came out.
Stop lying to yourself, guys. You know how
obvious this is.
And, Bretton Circus, by the way, points out
the same thing that executive order Trump signed.
We're gonna read it next just because, you
know, I just wanna give you the people
that were highlighting this, which led to us
going through more of the information.
Sign does not even come close to banning
gain of function. It bans funds going to
China, but specifically says that it will continue
in The US with vague promises about increased
safety. Okay. Here's the actual executive order. We're
not gonna read all of it. You can
read it all for yourself, and, hopefully, you
will if you actually care about the truth.
Right? If you're out there repeating narratives or
statements online and you haven't read it, ask
yourself why. Ask yourself why you don't feel
stupid about that. Ask yourself why it's more
important that the narrative of team sport politics
is guiding the day as opposed to what's
actually being stated.
Improving the safety and security of biological research.
So
in the name, it makes it clear,
improving the safety and security, not
stopping.
It says the Biden administration of course, this
is how you start. Right? Despite the fact
that Donald Trump did every single thing that
Biden did during his administration with this exact
kind of research, he did. Look it up.
We talked about it then. Biden administration
allowed dangerous gain of function. That's likely all
they need to read. Right?
If you're the a team sport politics player
and you read that, you go get them.
Bad Democrat. Biden did it. They're winning. We
did it. That's I mean, there are some
people that that's all they need right now,
and that's been tailored.
Biden administration allowed dangerous gain of function research
within The United States with insufficient levels of
oversight.
So based on what we know, based on
the this is now happening,
then by that logic, so did Trump, which
is true.
But, see, they don't just they don't say
that. My point is always is not partisan,
that they all did it, despite how weirdly
that gets taken as attacking Trump, even though
my point is Biden did it too. They're
all doing it. It's also actively approved through
the National Institutes of Health,
federal life science,
research funding in China, and other
countries where there is limit limited US oversight
or reasonable expectation of biosafety enforcement. So the
whole thing they build into is that we
are the ones that do the good stuff.
Right? The US government we're we're we're back
in square one. I mean, we are way
back in square one with this. We're going
back to good guy, altruistic US government doing
all the right things, freedom and democracy.
How long has it been since anybody actually
believed that?
But we're going back to it. Golden age.
Right? The idea is that we need to
make sure that we're in control. So, basically,
they're enshrining the idea that we're gonna keep
doing it. They can't.
And then getting their lackeys to go out
and say, it's over again if function stopped.
My administration will balance the prevention of catastrophic
consequences
with maintaining readiness.
That's pandemic preparedness, guys. Remember all those buzzwords?
Maintaining readiness against biological threats and driving global
leadership in biotechnology,
biological countermeasures.
That's weapon stuff, guys. That is literally the
military overlap that we that Destiny Resendiz and
plenty of others have been screaming about, and
it's right there in front of you. Biosecurity
and health research. Biological
countermeasures,
first of all, guys, we're that's where you
get into the back and forth of all
this. That is about I mean, you could
pretend they mean vaccines, but that's the whole
or rather,
yeah, you know,
therapeutics or whatever kind of game you wanna
play. What that means is exactly what we're
talking about.
They're working on these things to create some
kind of antidote vaccine, whatever you wanna call
it. The point is all of this is
continuing to gain a function. Says, shall establish
guidance for the heads of relevant agencies to
the extent consistent with the terms and conditions
of the funding to immediately, one, end federal
funding of dangerous gain a function research conducted
by foreign entities. Imagine reading that and pretending
that means that we're stopping it forever. I
mean, you've got three very clear terms there
that don't apply to everything. Federal versus others,
dangerous versus what they deem is not, and
foreign entities. So very clearly, they're not even
talking about The United States so far, and
it doesn't. It makes it clear when you
read that they're gonna continue it. Or in
other countries where there is not adequate oversight
to ensure that the countries are compliant with
The United States' oversight. I mean, at this
point, it's pretty obvious that the whole point
is whether they apply the safety measures, not
whether it stops.
And it says, end federal funding of other
life science research. Now that's worth its own
investigation,
like, what they feel that category truly applies
to, but it's a whole dangerous overlapping conversation.
Life science is you know, we get into
this weird transhumanist
direction.
We've gone into it a lot.
You know? But that doesn't mean every part
of it. Sure. There's parts of it you
could argue are gonna help people. That's usually
something they flout rather flout, but,
you know, bandy about in front of you
and make you think that this is gonna
be all it's about Neuralink in your arms.
And, clearly, it's just a shite. It's a
it's a part of it, and I argue
not even the part they care about. But
that that's for you to decide.
Then it says, life science research that is
occurring in countries of concern or foreign countries.
So, again, very clear about where we're talking
about. There is not adequate oversight to ensure
that the countries are compliant with, again, US
oversight standards and policies that could reasonably pose
a threat to public public safety and economic
or national security and determined by the heads
of relevant agencies. That that literally means anything.
Anything anywhere. If they decide to, you know,
make it into those categories, national security could
mean just about whatever they want. Now it
says within a hundred and twenty days of
this order, the director of the OSTP,
which was
the Office of Science and Technology Policy,
pursuant to a specific code and in coordination
with the APNSA
and the heads of relevant agencies, shall revise
or replace the twenty twenty four United States
government policy for oversight of dual use research
of concern and pathogens with enhanced
pandemic potential.
I mean, how many more examples do we
need? I don't even know if you're gonna
keep reading. I mean, so we we're changing
the dual use, which is the whole thing
we always talk about. Dual use is weapons.
That's what the term means. Weapons, but also
positive. You know, it can be it can
vaccinate you or you can kill you. In
all again, since we're even making that point,
one of the one of the specific shows
I did was on exactly that, as I've
referenced before, w use. That's an MIT study.
New aerosolized mRNA delivering nanoparticle
nanoparticles can vaccinate or they can eliminate.
That's their discussion, by the way. I'll include
that. And we've done many of them on
this topic.
And this was
2023.
Now
the point
where was it?
Yeah. So they're changing the dual use part
of it to a title that is
to strengthen top down independent
oversight.
Where was it?
To replace 24 with
wait. Did I where was that?
Well, I'll just keep reading. The point is
that they're they're replacing it and with the
same direction. It says strengthen top down independent
oversight, increase accountability through enforcement.
So if it doesn't exist, there's nothing to
enforce or have accountable.
And improve public transparency and clearly define the
scope of covered research while ensuring The United
States remains the global leader, the global leader
in biotechnology,
bio biological countermeasures in health research. So it's
gone from we don't do it to now
we're gonna lead the world in this exact
field
safely with counter with with oversight.
It is almost in it's almost insane how
easy it is to play people right now.
Now that's that's
let's put it this way. I don't know
whether everyone's falling for it or not. I
don't even know how we can tell.
My gut tells me that people are not
stupid enough to fall for this, and the
only ones that are screaming about it are
the ones that don't care or are involved
for the wrong reasons.
Most people can read these things. I think
they care. And if they and, eventually, whether
they go along with the headline or not,
I think at the end of the day,
this is gonna be clear. It's not ending.
It's in fact seems that they're gonna be
going even harder. Now it says incorporate enforcement
mechanisms, including those described in section seven of
this order, into federal funding arrangements agreements to
ensure compliance with all federal policies governing dangerous
gain of function research. So they even use
the term dangerous gain of function and make
it clear they're gonna do that.
Like, let me read that again.
Incorporate enforcement mechanisms, including those described in this
section above,
into federal funding agreements
to ensure compliance with all federal policies governing
dangerous gain of function research. So how do
you read that without realizing or acknowledging that
that that they're not stopping this. They're just
making sure that that's all the enforcement mechanisms
are in compliance and ensure that they meet
all federal policies for dangerous gain of function
research. So that might might have been a
mistake. I don't know. Nonetheless, we could see
it's not stopping. Just want the dangerous part,
I think, is interesting.
Provide for review and revision at least every
four years.
So it's gonna keep going. Within a hundred
and eighty days of the date of this
order, develop and implement a strategy to govern,
limit, and track dangerous gain of function research
across The United States that occurs within federal
funding and other life science research that could
cause significant societal consequences.
So the point, again, to make it even
more clear, is they're not stopping this in
The United States. They're going to track and
monitor even the ones they call dangerous.
Re continue reading this, guys. It's very clear.
It's actually so in we're in a special
time right now, I think, where I've never
been
it's actually pretty striking to see how easy
it is to fool some people right
now. I think more than ever, I think
we're in a very dangerous kind of technocratic,
you know,
social engineered time frame where people are kinda
losing it. Like, in this in with I
mean, it's the same point about not knowing
the majority. Where do you look for stuff
like that? People get frustrated with that, and
they fall back into what they know. That's
not even a knock on people. They've they've
used our own ways. They've used
our
they've used ourselves against ourselves. Let's put it
that way. But it says, ensure that the
revised policy called for a in section four
a of this order includes a mechanism
whereby research institutions that receive federal funding must
report
dangerous gain of function research. And to the
maximum extent permitted by law, include research that
is supported by non federal funding mechanisms.
I just don't know how much more clear
that can get.
Then, of course, under under definitions, dangerous gain
of function research means
scientific research
on an infectious agent or toxin with the
potential to cause disease
by enhancing its pathogenicity
or increasing its transmissibility.
So, that's literally what they're gonna do. You
can read this document for yourself.
So just to be clear, dangerous gain of
function research, even the word dangerous, only applies
and stops to people they don't want to
do it over in the world. So, basically,
they wanna be able to build up weapons
and bio stuff. They can't do it.
But they're not gonna listen. So who what
what does what does China care what The
US tells them they can or can't do?
So this is a facade.
Quite frankly, might as well be all of
them together. If we can understand how things
happen during COVID nineteen, I wouldn't dismiss that
possibility.
Disrupting beneficial immunological response or the effectiveness of
an immunization agent against or agent or toxin,
this was discussions of
research activities
are those that could result in significant
consequences,
and one of them being
disrupting
beneficial immunological
response
or the effectiveness of one of the things
they're giving against an agent. So I thought
that was interesting only because the basic point
well, let's just say it's a COVID shot.
Right? And we know the COVID shot is
killing people, and you try to give them
something that might stop that. They're saying right
there that now you're the one doing dangerous
re you're the one that is gonna be
held accountable because, you know, I I it's
it's an abstract thought, but I just thought
that stood out to me in the way
that, you know, if they are doing this,
which I think we can see, it comes
down to a point of whether you might
try to stop that in some way. And
now now they've written down that if you
do that, you're breaking the law. But those
are all side points. How do we misunderstand
this? How do we get to a point
to where people say,
oh, it's this one here? How do we
get to a point
to where people literally say that it's ending
gain of function?
No more research that kills millions of people.
I mean, it literally says the
opposite.
Now here is
doctor David Martin. I have a few clips
I wanna play you. This one is for
it's it's this it's, post by Maria
Siderholm,
and it's talking about December 17 when Trump
was in office. Here's what he has to
say.
Thank doctor Zheng Li Shi of the Wuhan
Institute of Virology
for access to the bat COV sequences and
the plasma Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one
spike protein.
She sent it to us, and then we
built the weapon in
Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Now why is that
important? And why is it important that we
have this precise conversation?
That is because the Department of of Energy
actually did the politically astute thing, and this
is really cool. When they came up with
what they call the low confidence interval,
that this was a lab leak from Wuhan,
they came up with that because they know
the answer. The answer is this wasn't a
lab leak from Wuhan.
Was the Wuhan Institute of Virology involved? Absolutely.
But what you'll see in all of the
documentation,
including
the recent past bill in congress,
is nobody's bothered to include North Carolina in
that list.
Nobody's bothered to include Ralph Baric in that
list. And he's the one who actually said
in 02/2015,
during the gain of function moratorium,
that the Wuhan Institute of Virology spike protein
was poised for human emergence.
He's the one that said the bomb was
loaded and delivered.
But we're not asking the question. Hey. Is
he under investigation? Is UNC Chapel Hill under
investigation? Is Anthony Fauci under investigation? And Robert
Redfield, as recently as just last week, said
without equivocation,
US taxpayers
paid for the development of this pathogen.
He didn't he didn't hide that at all.
And this is the CDC director
saying, we did it.
And you know what?
It's like saying aliens exist.
You know? People can hear it, and they
just go, oh, I must have misheard that.
It must be Wuhan. And then they go
back and do the stupid Wuhan investigation. Listen.
If we're serious about this, what we need
to do is we need to go to
UNC Chapel Hill, and we need to arrest
the people who are perpetrating this particular crime.
Right. We need to go to DC and
arrest Fauci for perpetrating this crime, and we
need to go to wherever Dashuk is hiding
and arrest him because they're the ones that
admitted to the crime
in public. Yep. And that's David Martin with
Kim Iverson in in the interview there.
But you realize what we're talking about. Right?
I mean, so isn't that what we were
promised?
Why isn't Fauci or Barrick or the rest
of them in prison right now? We know
all of these guys. This is not new.
Or where about what about anybody but a
Tesla vandal or or somebody screaming at a
Jewish person in the street? Like, is there
any but where is the actual accountability?
All the promises of arrests and or all
the claims of people lying and stealing money
and all these different things we've heard since
the beginning, and not a single person is
being arrested for any of it.
Doesn't that bother people for actual who actually
pretend accountability is coming?
It damn well should.
December 2017,
when Trump was in office,
NIH lifted the funding pause dating back to
October 2014.
Here's this is from the NIH, December two
thousand seventeen.
So it's funny how RFK Junior just casually
skipped over that part of the story. Don't
you find that telling?
NIH lifts funding pause of gain of function
during Donald Trump's administration
right up into COVID nineteen time frame.
These things should certainly matter to sleuths out
there trying to figure all this out. Right?
And by the way, I'll include this. This
is Ralph Barrick's
Ralph Barrick's curriculum
that David Martin and I discussed on our
interview, but, this is something that's been going
around a while. This this is the one
that I always like to show,
and I've done multiple two shows on this.
Here's one of his research discussions from '20,
1990. Coronavirus
induced myocarditis
in rabbits.
Look at
that. Almost like that's our coronavirus induced myocarditis
in rabbits right there even before
back in 1987.
Almost like they're working on how to abuse
that. You know, one of the different things.
Now you could argue about any number of
ways about, you know, that that that doesn't
exist and so on. Doesn't change the fact
that they wrote down they were working on
it. So that's the only point that really
matters. And I think it's worth considering whether
they were literally doing exactly that.
There it is.
Might as well include these.
Here's Ralph Baric right there. US funded research
on coronavirus induced myocarditis.
That's where we include that link. When I
followed up, did the US government work on
a myocarditis inducing virus? The answer is yes.
Then work to aerosolize it? Also, yes, in
the case of China. All of this during
the overlap of multiple left and right administrations,
which passed through Trump. And, well, technically,
the tail end of this research was before
both Trump and Biden, I argue, but the
point is they continued all of this through
other people's work well through both of them.
Now here
is the next clip. Now the point on
this, guys, is just to remember
that Trump looked at this that led right
up to where we are. But it's not
only about Trump. It's about the continuation of
all of them can doing the same thing
right up until now. Doctor Francis Boyle,
the who he drafted the Biowarfare Act that
they still use, has been saying this and
ringing this bell since the moment he saw
this come down. Here's what he was saying.
And I believe this is an interview with
the
oh, I I never mind. I thought it
was a different platform. Either way, just listen
to what he has to say.
Say. Later on, I pointed out
that the,
COVID nineteen was also,
developed
at the University of North Carolina,
BSL
three,
by,
Ralph Barrick
working with the Chinese back queen from the
Wuhan BSL Four.
In addition
involved there at the UNC BSL three
was for Dietrich,
itself.
Also,
the, to get to your point on the
vaccines,
colonel,
the Food and Drug Administration
was involved
in the development
of COVID nineteen, the offensive biological warfare weapon.
And today
as we speak,
colonel,
it has been the food and drug administration
that has approved all these,
COVID nineteen
vaccines. So they they helped develop the weapon
and now they are approving these, these so
called,
vaccines.
As for the, vaccines themselves, I don't I'm
not part of any anti vax movement. I
I call them Franken shots. I,
to distinguish them, there are some legitimate vaccines
out there.
But I call these things,
franken
shots.
It was the Pentagon
defense advanced,
research program agency
that,
envisioned
and funded
this mRNA
technology
that is behind all these, Franken shots.
So they have us coming and, going, colonel.
These,
mRNA,
they give you particles
of COVID nineteen
that get injected into your body. They are
injecting into your body particles of an offensive
biological
warfare weapon
with gain of function properties being injected into
your body.
And that is why
Doctor Boyle has been on this from the
beginning.
Now I think it's important to highlight as
well. It's funny. I was just trying to
search for it because it's it's, something that's
pretty you know, this is just interesting to
me how this comes up. So don't forget,
on top of everything else we talked about,
that Donald Trump gave Fauci a medal
on the way out.
Then, you know, you wonder why he's not
being arrested. Now here's Snopes, and, of course,
even they go, yep. True. Of course, what's
funny is you can easily prove this. Nonetheless,
it's interesting how it got it gets very
little conversation.
Here's our interview with doctor David Martin. Very
much worth your time. Yeah. I find him
to be a very, very insightful and and,
you know, nonpartisan objective person.
I'll play a couple of things from this
I think are important for you to hear.
No. Actually, a cup I think I've got,
a few videos I wanna play from this
time frame before we continue on some of
this stuff. Now one of them well, actually,
two of them, technically, are around
the conversation of gain of function. One of
them is from, the last Trump administration. One
of them is from the Biden administration. I
think they're both relevant to hear. First, about,
doctor David Martin. I've been doing this now
for twenty years. And and what one of
the things I find frustrating is people pretend
like there's this who done it kind of
gumshoe sleuthing required to go through and find
all the stuff that's the evidence.
It doesn't actually take any creativity or effort.
This thing was done in plain sight. It
was engineered in plain sight.
It was publicly announced.
By 2016,
we even knew that it was the Wuhan
variant that was the one that they had
chosen.
Like, there's nothing left to the imagination.
We knew that it was WIV one poised
for for human emergence. Right? This is not
a I wonder if it could be a
bat and a pangolin going into a bar
in Wuhan One night and getting it on
and boom, out comes baby COVID. No.
We knew in 2016
that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus one
model was the one that they had selected
for the weapon.
And so, you know, you sit back and
you you say, well,
how is it that in the face of
such egregiously
public information,
We still are asking
questions about motivation, about whether this was from
nature, whatever it is. Listen, people,
they said in their own words, this was
to hype
a drug
to get the public to accept something that
without terror, the public would have never agreed
to. Mhmm. That's their
words,
not mine. Mhmm. And when you have a
world in which, as you have on the
screen right now,
actually stated outright
biohacking, synthetic coronaviruses,
biological
warfare enabling technologies, you know, you don't have
to interpret that. That doesn't require some spin.
When you say biological warfare enabling technology, you
are not talking about something
that is an innocent oops, who could have
known, who could have seen. It is actually
a declaration
of war against humanity, and we have it
in black and white.
One of the many. And here it is
again. This is the same document I was
showing you.
'57. Synthetic
synthetic
coronaviruses.
'2 thousand '5.
Biohacking,
biological
warfare enabling technologies.
Now, again, you guys, it doesn't have to
be that you believe this this could have
all been built towards something they failed at
or, you know, however you wanna look at
it. Just recognize how much he's right. I
love the way he says that egregiously public
information. And they always get you driving you
know, jumping down
tangential holes
that may be irrelevant, but let's not miss
the forest for the trees, like, every single
time. That's something I can't stop noticing in
the last so many years at on overdrive.
Like, you know, you know, like Lahaina or
anything else where there's very valid things to
be diving into.
And and nothing we should be dismissing, guys.
Anything. No matter how ridiculous it may sound,
it's worth your consideration to make who knows?
Anything is possible. The point is that as
we investigate some of the more abstract theories,
let's make sure we're not missing the straight
up criminality that is right in front of
you. Whether it's the government trying to seize
land for, you know, or any number of
these conversations. That happens every time. And what
and then we get pulled into, which again,
you shouldn't be dismissing. You should consider conversations
of other things that, you know, like direct
energy weapon conversation. I was the one out
of everybody in that conversation that first highlighted
as as far as I could tell. I
didn't see anybody else talking about it. And
it became a conversation once we put it
out there, but certainly it's possible somebody else
said it somewhere about the direct energy directorate
that was on Maui. Now my point was
that's interesting.
Not that that proves necessarily anything, but I'm
like, wow, that's an interesting overlap. Let's keep
investigating this and find And that, you know,
the whole thing is it spun out into
something much more crazy, which is still something
worth your consideration.
But because the partisan game, people like Nick
Sorter, for example, who abused that situation and
got donations from lots of people and then
stayed at high, fancy hotels, which he got
called out for by his own audience, the
The point is that is how these games
get distracted, and we start lump jumping at
blue roofs and people like Stu Peters who
lie to you about the color of Obama's
Obama or, Obama Oprah's roof, for example. You
know, we get pulled into him. So my
point is, think about the obviousness of this
and what we're dealing with and how much
you can literally prove that they got caught
lying. Even at the most core value of
this, that just that people were being hurt
and they covered it up
instead of starting with the more abstract dynamics
that are impossible to prove. We have them
on these things, and, like, that's why David
Martin got so frustrated about this because it
was right there.
It was literally right in front of you,
and they used partisanship to get you jumping
at shadow. Well, let's just even put it
this way, jumping at things that were not
the most immediate thing that you could prove.
And some of those were shadows. Others, I
think, were valid.
Very interesting. Now another video that I think
I started with just to play this, because
this is something he was very explicit about,
and this overlaps with the Trump administration. Because
that's what he's saying about this. Because remember,
when this started, that was on the tail
end of the 02/2017
reversal of the gain of function point during
Trump's administration.
And then
what the the vaping thing, the different nursing
homes, the ground glass opacity, Fort Detrick leak,
the military
Wuhan games, and then Biden takes over. We
should be having a public dialogue, and it
should be something that rises to the level
of legislation. We should not allow the National
Institutes of Health or the Department of Defense
to allocate funding to amplify these agents
so that, allegedly, we can study them in
the case that they fall into the hands
of bad people. Because the evidence
has shown us
that the bad people who actually have unleashed
these pathogens
since 1991
And by the way, if you go to
miscellaneous
memorandum seven and other documents,
we can go back to the nineteen fifties.
The bad people who unleashed these things on
the population
are us.
It is The US who's doing it.
Now, again, I always take issue with The
Us. Right? He means the government, and we're
not the government, but that's the point he's
making is that it was the US government,
all of it.
Now before we go on to some other
points,
it's interesting to me to to play this
out. Now one of them is about and
this is the other one point I didn't
make during all of that is the the
executive order was
that what if they just called something else?
It's the same thing I said about Tennessee
and the,
you know, stop spraying our skies discussion, which
I still think is a positive step, but
it didn't stop it because as even Catherine
have pointed out, they can simply spray it
higher or lower levels. They can call it
something else. There there's ways and and you
look up, I see it every single day.
But at least it's being discussed, but it's
still not a I didn't stop it. So
we shouldn't act like these you know, this
is the same point here. Is that clearly,
EPPP
is something they've floated now. And as you
if you look up the difference, there is
a nuance to it, at least as they've
carved it out. So now that they're not
using the EPP point, EPPP,
in the executive order, what does that mean?
That mean they can do that still? Is
it only these ones? And, of course, dangerous
becomes this category they can define all their
own? Or how about the larger point of
executive orders only applying to the executive branch,
so it technically doesn't even make sense for
him to do this and claim it has
any effect on foreign governments?
But yeah. Because, you know, the adults in
the room and the partisan teams for politics
don't say that, so I must be the
crazy one. Despite the fact that it's the
most embarrassingly obvious part of this whole executive
order ploy, it's not gonna do anything.
Many of the ones that are having the
most praise aren't actually ever going to see
any light of day in the real sense
because it was made design it was made
to be stopped. Catherine made this point right
in the beginning. The way they're going about
these changes guarantee that they won't stay. And
I think that's by design.
Frustrating. But this point is about Rand Paul
going back and forth with doctor Fauci, and
it's about this exact point. I think it's
worth considering and hearing these arguments as we
kinda just stumble into the same realm yet
again.
Doctor Fauci, do you still support funding
of the NIH funding of the lab in
Wuhan?
Senator Paul, with all due respect,
you are entire entirely
and completely incorrect
that the NIH
has not ever and does not now
fund
gain of function
research. Isn't that lovely?
Well, just so it's clear, guys, there is
literally nobody other than
he lied. Okay? Like, every he lied really
bombastically.
This is during Trump's administration. No. No. But
he got he gave they gave him a
medal and sent him on his way. Okay?
This guy has never even been never even
flirted with going to jail.
You have to think about how wild that
is. The point is that he's acting like
it didn't even happen at this point. So
why are we thinking it's any different now?
In the Wuhan Institute Do they fund doctor
Barrick?
We do not fund Do you fund doctor
Barrick's gain of function research?
Doctor Barrick does not doing gain of function
research. Oh, you mean coronavirus inducing myocarditis does
not gain of function?
Because you didn't I wanna be clear again.
You have to understand. Fauci literally knows he's
lying right here, which just has to show
you something. And if it is, it's according
to the guidelines,
and it is being conducted in North
Carolina.
You don't think it's exerting a bat virus
spike protein that he got from the Wuhan
Institute into the SARS virus's gain of function.
That is a good news. The minority because
at least 200 scientists have signed a statement
from the Cambridge working group saying that it
is gain of function. Well, it is not.
And if you look at the grant
and you look at the progress reports,
it is not gain of function despite the
fact
that people tweet that. So do you still
support sending money to the Wuhan Virology Institute?
Before he answers that, I mean, this is
the frustrating gain that you're still seeing today.
That's how politics works. The nuance with, you
know, the El Salvador and Garcia and the
work facilitate. These they they they make these
ridiculous game nuances, and they stress
stretch it out forever until nothing happens.
Okay. Fine. Forget the organic function, Fauci. Are
you doing things that cause this to happen?
Right? Or did this was this a part
of the let you know. It yes is
the obvious answer. You can call it whatever
you want and pretend like because of some
definition nuance that it doesn't apply to the
term. It still is the problem that we're
all highlighting. You know? And and then but
if you'll get mired in these very small
nuances for obvious reasons, they they do that
to make you miss the bigger picture. We
do not send money now to do Wuhan
We support sending money. We did. Under your
tutelage, we were sending it through EcoHealth. It
was a subagent test money.
You didn't give money
to the Wuhan Lab
to do gain of function research. That is
correct.
Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime
to lie to congress,
do you wish to retract your statement of
May 11 where you claimed that the NIH
never funded gain of function research in Wuhan?
Senator Paul, I have never lied
before the congress,
and I do not retract
that statement.
This paper that you're referring to
was judged by qualified
staff up and down the chain
as not
being gain of function.
What was Let me So literally everybody involved
with the gain of function stood up and
said it's definitely not gain of function. They
finished. You take an animal virus and you
increase its transability to humans Right. You're saying
that's not gain of function? That is correct.
And and senator Paul, you do not know
what you are talking about, quite frank. And
then it just doubles down on his righteous
indignation.
Very interesting. So here is a clip in
2020,
wait. It's '23, I think. Either way, it's
it's it's with Kirby and in Biden's administration.
Now just recognize,
it didn't even slow down. Okay? And the
point is that in that time frame,
Kirby acts like he doesn't even know what
we're talking about.
So this what I wanted to be clear
is that clearly this is just a can
being kicked down the road. And now not
only are they not stopping it, as we
just showed you in the executive order, it
seems as if they're gonna become the leader
in the world in this field as long
as they stop the bad guys in the
world from doing what they are the one
that are they've always been doing.
Version of of the virus, you've made clear
that there's no consensus.
Does the president believe, though, that the reward
outweighs the risk when it comes to gain
of function research?
Does the reward outweigh the risk when it
comes to gain of That type of research
is pretty degree. You're gonna have to
say that again?
Really,
really bad acting by Kirby.
That was a very simple sentence, and the
words are all very well known, especially to
someone in his position.
But they wanna act like, what do you
mean? What is that word?
Not working.
Does the president believe that this type of
gain of function research
is proven?
He believes that,
it's important
to help prevent future pandemics. Oh, okay. So
exactly the same line of Donald Trump. Okay.
So if you support this current Trump and
you support if you if you support this
current Trump direction, then you also support Biden.
Hope that makes you uncomfortable.
Which means
he understands
that there has to be
legitimate scientific research
into the sources or potential sources of pandemics
so that we understand it so that we
can prevent them, and we can prevent them
from happening, obviously.
But he also believes, and and and this
is why he wants
the the whole of government effort here to
understand it,
that that research has to be done, must
be done in a safe and secure manner
as and as transparent as possible to the
rest of the world so that Yes. Yes.
So people know what's going on. Exactly. I
think that's
a fancy way of saying yes. Yeah. Okay.
Exactly. So Kirby agrees with Trump. Alright? So
Kirby and Biden's administration are doing they're we're
doing exactly what Trump is doing now. So
they're on the same page. Again, I that
needs to be clear. There's I'm sure you
can go out of your way to try
to find some small nuance different or at
least by in narrative, by the way. In
practice, it is exact you know why? Because
the rest of the narrative is all just
ever changing. The function has never stopped. That's
the point.
Going forward,
five times August says, I'm just saying I
I'm just saying maybe there are probably
there probably wouldn't be so much infighting and
drama amongst Maha and the medical freedom community
if it didn't feel like the mRNA poisons
and COVID era blunders
were being intentionally swept under the rug.
He said that today.
Now he's kind of being sarcastic. He, obviously,
he's been calling this out incredibly. So what's
just it what's funny to me is that,
you know, people like the Hodges brothers, for
example,
make the point like, well, there's a psyop
trying to divide MAGA. I'm always like, there's
no psyop. I mean, sure, probably is in
every context all the time, but my point
is you don't need a psyop to divide
these people. Okay? Some of them just aren't
stupid. They're not falling for the obvious lies
because they can literally read the order that
says the opposite of what everyone's cheering on.
So you don't need the psyop. You just
need people that pay attention. And that goes
to left and right, guys. It's how partisanship
works. Stinson Norwood says day one ten, the
Trump Vance administration
is still pushing COVID nineteen shots for toddlers,
which they are, and you can look it
up on their own website. CEC.
What were didn't we get told didn't didn't
he claim that he was gonna pull that
off the schedule or the schedule was gonna
change? No. No. It seems to be the
same. It seems to be going getting worse.
They're still advertising these shots. They're still letting
them take these shots. They're now they're promoting
MMR. They're doing Stargate. They have essentially hundreds
of m of mRNA
shots in the works right now from Moderna
to Pfizer to CureVac. It's all,
Mary,
Bowden, MD, just pointed that out.
It's all on overdrive, but his point is
correct. Clearly, they're not doing what the promise
was.
Here is, weirdly enough, Brett Weinstein saying
he just made some he that says, Brett
Weinstein just made something clear on the Tucker
Carlson show.
President Trump is the reason
the COVID shot is still being recommended for
kids.
He says, quote, I believe it could be
done effectively instantaneously.
You don't you don't need to say I
believe. It literally could. I mean, even if
you if in a common normal sense, yes,
they could make that happen. And what's funny
is with this sort of King Trump mentality
that they have about the he was got
a he got a majority and a mandate,
so they could just do whatever you want.
That's not how it works. Well, by your
logic, then why wouldn't that be Yang? Well,
there's a process, Ryan. It's gonna take four
years. Funny how that doesn't apply when it's
what you think you should want. What's crazy,
though, I I don't trust these people. I
have a lot of reason not to. My
point, though, is that even he seems to
be calling out Trump for being the central
reason. Because, guys, whether it's RK or Trump
or whatever else, the reason the point is
not that you have to blame somebody. You
should. But the point is it is still
being given.
All of this mental gymnastics to make sense
of it. This was a core promise,
like, the core promise from at least Maha.
And, nope,
it's still there.
Interestingly enough, here's what Nicole Shanahan said on
the seventh. Now it was a response or
captioned what doctor Suzanne Humphrey said in response
to Children's Health Defense, which said, president Trump
nominates doctor Casey Means to be the next
US Surgeon General. We'll talk about that briefly
in one second. Some some very weird internal
infighting
amongst the Baja conservative,
quote, of Trump MAGA discussion.
Doctor Suzanne says, doctor Jack, Cruz, cru Cruz,
I think it's Cruz.
Krause or Cruz tried to tell us.
Mary Talley Bowden.
I keep saying Bowden, but I I wanna
put a d in her name for some
reason. And I I respect her work. She's
one of the few who has been consistent,
objective, at least nonpartisan in calling people out
for what they're doing. I I make sure
you you follow her. Doctor Mary Talley Bowen
was on the podcast too. The point is
a lot of us, and, yes, both of
them were screaming about this, and that's why
I think doctor David Eich and a lot
have been saying, look. I'm I'm done with
this. Even going after Jimmy Dore, for example,
and plenty of others that are like, look.
I'm tired of this game where people are
now calling it out when we were showing
you then and you called us black pill.
You know? And I look.
Some of them were very quick to recognize
the problem and called it out. And I
actually will give one small
what Jimmy Dore said on his discussion was
that look. And it's actually I said this
made sense at the time.
That Donald Trump has been committing genocide. We
can all see that. That we so we
can't reward that by leaning in
or rather, the other way around. Biden has
become a genocide the whole time in Gaza.
We can see that. Right? So the whole
point was we can't reward that by supporting
his new the next Democrat administration. So we'll
go with Trump, and if he does it,
then we'll call him out. And I'm like,
well, I think we all know what's gonna
happen, my opinion. But at least the logic
was somewhat it made sense.
But, nonetheless, I still called it out too,
but that was just worth giving you the
nuance there because he did quickly call him
out when it continued. The point is that
far too many people
were calling you crazy, black pill, lunatic, and
then and then, you know, most of them
are now at least somewhat calling out some
of the problems without really acknowledging
that this was exactly what you could have
seen, that we were proving that was gonna
happen. So he said or she goes on
to say, she knows the deal with means.
Let's see how it all pans out pans
out. I can't help but think this is
a very carefully groomed and selected person in
regard to the surgeon general. Just about no
clinical experience.
Talks a great game about about everything but
vaccines. Feels all wrong. Why? There are so
many better choices.
Oh, might as well I'm not sure what
this I haven't seen it, but looked at
doctor Henry Eli says, if you want a
woman that believes in 24 metabolic surveillance by
AI and who has no tangible clinical experience
and whose family has ties to Rockefellers and
who has was a silent as a church
mouse in 2020, '20 '20 '1, '20 '20
'2, '20 '20 '3, who has ties to
weft, Gavi, Biden, Clinton, and who then then
then this is a MAGA Maha pick from
heaven. Wow. And I I don't disagree with
any of that, by the way. He just
really nailed it with, here, let me keep
that one for you. Oh, actually, I already
tagged it. So here
is what Nicole Shanahan said. Now this is
actually really important. Don't forget, she was the
vice president
running, you know, per
if RFK would be elected, she would have
been the vice president.
He she says yes
in regard to doc in in response to
doctor Susan Humphreys. Yes. It's very strange.
Doesn't make any sense. I was promised
that if I supported RFK Jr in his
senate confirmation
that neither of these siblings would be working
under HHS
or in an appointment
and that much and and that people much
more qualified would be. I don't know if
RFK very clearly lied to me
or what is going on. That's a pretty
this is a scathing statement because it's she's
lost faith, it seems.
It has been clear in recent conversations that
he is reporting to someone regularly who is
controlling his decisions,
and it isn't president Trump. Wow. That's a
crazy thing to say.
And regards with regards to the siblings, there
is something very artificial and aggressive about them,
almost like they were bred and raised Manchurian
assets. This is seems like everyone's become a
conspiracy theorist, a, about effing time. There's not
to say that every possible crazy thing is
is true, but the fact that we're finally
now considering
that things like this, whether procedures or not,
like, yes, of course, that's possible. Or maybe
just they're corrupt. You know? But that's incredible,
isn't it? That's a very, very large statement
from somebody with a lot of influence who
was towing the Maha the Maha lion until
very recently.
Bryce Lipscomb, not familiar with his work. I
I do follow him, but I'm not super
familiar.
Oh, you know what? I I think back.
I followed him after this. I I'm just
remembering that now. I was reading this. Well,
I wanna see what this guy continues to
put out, but not familiar with his work.
70,000 followers. Says, yes. I have gradually lost
my support for senator Kennedy and completely lost
trust in the Maha movement. Now
it depends on how you mean that. My
opinion is the movement, these things it's like
any of these movements. They get co opted
immediately if not from the very beginning. Don't
lose faith in the or rather interest or
support in the Maha
mentality, the idea of let's make this place
healthy again. Let's get rid of the dangerous
injections. Let's get seed oils out of our
food. Like, these things are obviously
correct, I believe, anyway.
I just don't think that was what these
people really wanted or whether Kennedy did it
at first or not. Something has clearly changed.
But it goes on to say, I was
blind during the Kennedy twenty four campaign. Seeing
its idealism and populism as a promising path
forward and truth, it was a collection of
unrealistic promises. Now maybe. Right? I mean, we
shouldn't pretend like wanting all those things is
unrealistic. We just want peep we just I
mean, whether we need to, you know, know
government and go to some society where we'd
actually be happy or realizing we would need
at least somebody who might actually care about
these things or maybe not compromise if they
do. It says, additionally, the campaign was heavily
composed of leftist and progressives. It was in
the beginning, for sure. I worked hard to
bring conservatives on board, but was met with
suspicion and accused of being a Trump plant
by Kennedy left. Now that's that was the
interesting time when he joined Trump and then
he kind of pulled over whoever, which I
think was the plan, whoever was willing to
to, you know, work alongside somebody on on
the other side. Progressivism and populism are foolish
ideologies, says, you could decide if you think
that's true, the best thing to come from
the campaign was Nicole Shanahan.
Mary Talley Bowen says it turned up it
turned into quite a mess.
So a lot of people are starting to
call this stuff out. Here's Mary Talley Bowen,
MD.
The new surgeon general has never called for
the COVID shots to be pulled off the
market.
That's why she was picked. That's her opinion,
but think about that.
Seems to be in line with the direction
right now. Gain of function, Stargate, MMR.
Guys, it's everywhere. Bird flu.
What's, like, always always
forget it right in the moment when I'm
trying to say it. Like, right just out
of the title.
Meet the new boss, same as the old
boss is what that exactly is talking about.
She goes, I know the other four, front
runner well who was not picked because of
this issue. Kennedy is powerless. Now I I
get frustrated with that.
Everyone seems to want to, you know,
what we certainly could be or he's not
what he seems to be, which is obviously
one of the possibilities. Now I know I
mean, even I would argue it seems less
likely to me. I don't know how I
said many times you factor in all the
time that was spent before this,
but you know it's possible. So I'm frustrated
that people continue to give that sort of,
like, you know, this, you know, the the
assuming it's blackmail, assuming that he's being pressured,
assuming that he knows, but I know him,
he wouldn't do that. Well, I I I
you do know them, some of these people,
so you probably know better than me, but
you have to. At least, we can't stop
knowing that online. Like, that is some you
know, he is being blackmailed or, you know,
after the whole we by the way, the
whole weird Ian Carroll overlap after that. Remember
the how weird that was?
Candace puts out a video that wasn't even
really about it exactly, and he makes it
into some, this is absolutely gonna change everything
forever, which kicks off this whole he's being
blackmailed argument even though nothing in that even
proved remotely it was happening. Now, again, I
feel it's almost likely,
but I don't have any evidence, so I'm
not gonna say that I know that. So
it's a weird thing. But since then, that
seems to be the go to argument as
opposed to considering whether he may just not
maybe or whether he was never that person,
which is possible. I don't think that's the
case. Or maybe he has been motivated for
other reasons.
Money, influence,
which, again, doesn't line up for me, but
you can't ignore these possibilities.
Here's what Kennedy said.
The absurd attacks on Casey Means reveal how
just how far off course our health care
conversations have veered and how badly entrenched interests,
including big food and the industry funded social
media
gurus, are terrified of change. Well, interesting way
to start framing that, seeing as how there's
very valid concerns, and nobody's acting like these
are hypothetical conspiracy theories. They're late they're listing
off very provable facts that she that I
think are very concerning to people in the
Maha movement. So I find that strange.
Casey has excelled in every endeavor she has
undertaken, which is not to say that she's
the one that we care about. She has
she was president of her Stanford undergrad class,
was a standout at Stanford medical school, was
a top performer in surgical residency. So far,
again, those things matter, but being an expert
does not necessarily mean you're honest or care
about the same things we do. She had
the courage to leave traditional medicine behind. She
realized her patients were getting better. Oh, by
the way,
interesting.
Like, Loomer, for example, is from a different
angle,
attacking her for having some weird esoteric belief
about I it's just it's so weird how
when I think it becomes the core point,
whether it asks more about Zionism, technocracy, or,
actually, the people like her muddy the water
with things that may not be irrelevant to
you, but seem to be going, look over
there. I just thought I'd find it interesting.
And but that's irrelevant to the point right
now. It goes on to say, the attack
that Casey is unqualified
because she left the medical system completely missed
the point of what we're trying to accomplish
with Maha. Now I agree with that, actually.
It shouldn't be the that alone is not
reason to say that she's not qualified
if maybe we want something different. Right? But
that's not the point they're making. Casey is
the perfect choice for surgeon general precisely because
she left traditional Western medical system. I would
agree with that. Not that that proves she's
the right choice, but that's something that gives
me the indication she's open to different things.
Her leadership has inspired many doctors to reform
the system and forge a new path away
from sick care.
And it says, after leaving traditional medicine, Casey
started a company and wrote a New York
Times best selling book that empowered patients and
helped launch the Maha movement.
This ability of Casey's to inspire
Americans to rethink our health care system is
also an existential threat to the status quo
interest, which profit from sickness.
The goal of Maha is to reform the
largest and most powerful industry in The United
States. Now how about we just get rid
of that industry? Right? The idea that we
wanna reform
the pharmaceutical industry, like, how about we just
get rid of the big pharma dynamic? You
know, Let companies be companies. Let's stop. We
don't need some government incestuous fascist overlap of
this, which is the case, whether it's at
NIH or or politicians who directly profit from
the way these things go forward. So that's
my problem with that. We keep acting like
we want to alter and reform and shift
and, you know, update. No. Most of what
people wanted that were drifted into this by
Maha and MAGA was removal.
Right? Not shifting, but complete removal. Get rid
of the Fed. Get rid of the IRS.
Get rid of which I argue were wildly
unlikely, but I want those things too. Here
we are.
I have little doubt that these companies and
their conflicted media outlets will continue to pay
bloggers and other social media influencers to weaponize
innuendo. I think what he's actually referencing here
is, like, the mainstream attack on her as
opposed to the MAGA
internal
concern about what she is. That's usually how
they play this. Democrats hate her, so you
should blindly trust her. And it works for
some of them, but it will not work.
Every day I wake up and embolden the
drive embolden the drive change because I know
the support of Maha moms has my back.
Casey has played an integral role in galvanizing
these moms. Casey articulates better than any American
in the North. So my point is, doesn't
address in any way the concerns of what
people are talking about.
The the blind support or rather no pushing
back on, but continued support for the direction
they're all in or claims of simply not
even having a license.
Mary Talley Bowden.
Shouldn't the surgeon general have an active medical
license?
Now maybe it's the case that you don't
technically need one to be surgeon general. Technically,
you don't need you know, that's not as
abnormal as you may think. People with the
highest power don't like, the president doesn't have
to be military. Right? We get he's the
commander in chief. This that happens. But I
think it's an interesting choice.
Steve Kurt says RFK Junior is not calling
the shots here. I know this was not
his first choice. See, that's my I hate
that. But maybe he's not. Shouldn't cons you
know, you should consider that. But we don't
know this. We don't know that. Maybe he's
been picking maybe he picks this person for
other reasons. You know? I think we need
to recognize
every single step. It's just not in the
direction that we were promised.
That's what I think is very clear.
The problem though
is that every single time there's an example
of something that shouldn't be happening or goes
the wrong direction,
what do you get?
Some kind of a manufactured excuse. For example,
hangover Democrats.
Right? As even Brooke Jackson said this in
our interview. Even even Barnes, who was her
lawyer, came up and said around the fact
that the DOJ sided with Pfizer
without any evidence to back it up that
apparently it was a couple of lefty hangovers
in the DOJ.
And I I Brooke doesn't agree with that
and doesn't seem to make sense to me.
But
it doesn't show there's no evidence, and we
just keep going forward. Now people just go,
oh, well, it was lefties. We'll see what
keeps happening is that when you blame when
you say that, people weirdly then don't care
about the problem anymore.
Well, shouldn't we still care that Trump sides
with Pfizer whether or not that's because of
x, y, and z? Apparently not. And so
that's how this continues to work.
And I think it's pretty obvious that with
everything else that's happening, he does.
But they'll always go, well, that was because
of those lefty. Or the Epstein discussion we'll
get to next about how we apparently, there's
these background people. Well, why aren't they imprison
them? If you know it's them, where are
they? Why aren't they in prison? What's their
name? What's their position?
Doesn't happen because they don't exist in my
opinion. In this case, as I just simply
said, told you, because I knew that it
was the thing we all did that this
was going to be coming.
Alex Jones says, watch Marjorie Taylor Greene raise
the alarm of globalist traitors inside the Republican
party trying to sabotage the Trump agenda. The
overarching point is this gives you excuse to
say no matter anything bad,
it's because of those whole it's because of
those saboteurs.
Okay. So you mean your administration?
Republicans no less.
So are they were they secret saboteurs, or
are they just suddenly called that when they
don't align with your agenda? The point is,
guys, you can always pretend it's some internal
d guess what?
They're lying to you. Now not about whether
there's internal decent people pushing back. These are
their agendas. These are not some holdover dynamic.
Trump's side with Pfizer because he did the
first time. Trump is rolling on Stargate because
he did the first time. It's the same
discussion. Left and right, they're on the same
path.
But
they give you an excuse. People who just
don't wanna believe it because their world was
built around this guy or Biden or whatever
else will take what they can get.
So
to point out an important interview that James
and I had, James Corbett interview, this is
from 04/26/2025,
entitled engineered division and subservience
under a guise of resistance, which applies to
the left and the right. Right? The left
in resistance against the Trump administration, when in
reality, you're just basically you know, it it's
about creating the feeling that you're resisting the
power, when in reality, you you are fighting
for the power. It's the divide and conquer
dynamic, and that's why I changed this meme
to make it look like left and right
reversed but with deep state in their mind
because they both think the other side's a
deep state. Because and even though it's all
of your government or, you know, not as
simple as that. The point is it's just
not it's not one faction of it. It
is simply a government dynamic.
And, frankly, I think we have been overtaken
by whatever we think this dynamic is, technocratic,
globalist, Zionist kind of
glob, you know, this problem that we keep
seeing. The point is,
as long as they get you thinking you're
pushing back,
blinding you to everything else happening.
Now,
on the first,
which we've been seeing escalate
continually,
the Epstein files are day one, we're gonna
do this. Day one, we're gonna do that.
And, you know, just and it keeps stretching
out, which nobody with a brain ever thought
half these things were gonna happen on day
one. But they told you you were dumb
for not agreeing with that. And now when
it comes out, give them some time. You
can't do it right away. Well, you get
to play it both ways, don't you? White
House has, quote, no specific timeline to release
Epstein files despite Trump's promises.
What does that even mean?
I mean, guys, anybody with a brain at
this point is going, okay. This this is
clearly not what we were told. All the
people involved with the phase one binders that
gave you really nothing new, they were part
of the manipulation and have yet to say
so. So either they knew it from the
beginning or they're too afraid to admit that
they were played. The point to show you
this is that they were telling you, we
have no specific timeline. So, basically, still dripping
it for, we're gonna keep this will come
out. That's the point. We will eventually get
to the information. Well, the point is if
you understand the reality of this, even remotely,
you recognize that it's not partisan. You recognize
that it involves Israel. You recognize that Trump
and the rest of them are all very
tapped into this problem.
So here US Homeland Security News simply says,
there is no Epstein list, which we've heard
them continue to float. Like, this this was
one of the counterpoints
that they started to float out. Well, there's
not really a list per se, even though,
yes, there is. And Derek Bros recently just
talked about this. Actually, that was something I
was gonna grab.
But the idea that, yeah, well, there's there
is a black book. There is a conversation.
We've had this before.
But on top of that, well, I don't
think anybody is necessarily
saying that there's a one stop shop paper
listed in your files,
but where are the people that were guilty?
You keep telling us you've got the the
crimes that you can see, people that were
victimized. Okay. Then who is the person that
did this?
Right? Who did Epstein deal with? Well, he
wasn't just selling it to nobody. Right? He
was facilitating a a service
for whom? For whom? And I think that's
the important way to look at this. They
do have information here, guys.
Oh, here. Hold on.
I just wanna show you this to give,
you know, Derek a shout out as well.
Because he's been doing work around this for
a long time as well.
Let's see.
Should be right here.
Maybe not.
Dang it. Well, I didn't I don't wanna
keep circling for it. He recently posted something
about that.
Anyway, I'll come back to it later, and
I'll try to include it. The bottom line,
the main point here,
there is no Epstein list. Certain clients of
Epstein Island are known, but a separate criminal
case would have to be filed based on
individual incidents and alleged crimes, based on witness
testimony and hard evidence. Right. So that is
the slow distancing of the reality.
Well, we'll get there. It'll just take more
abstract direction time and all and drift and
drift and drift in the background until you
just stop asking for it. That's how this
works. No such evidence is known to exist.
A list of clients proves nothing
prosecution. Very sorry. Epstein criminals have covered the
tracks very well. This is what you're getting
from the administration promising to solve to deal
with this.
Or did we forget already about the JFK
lie they put out that didn't really solve
anything or the other things they keep promising?
Like Corey Hughes told you, there was this
mostly just misdirection
ultimately.
Now here's what you're getting from the current
conversation as of May 6 from Gateway Pundit.
Representative James Colmer comes out, claims Epstein files
may have been destroyed. Now when they've already
basically floated this, we already talked about this,
I think, a couple weeks ago, where they
said, well, it might have been destroyed because
of the bad guys in the FBI.
Very clearly, they wanted to prime you for
that because they knew this wasn't coming. That's
how I read this.
Accuses federal government of possible cover up. Okay?
So
will you I'm so people reading the the
gateway pundit, read that as the Democrats.
Right? Even though this has been ongoing, multiple
administrations,
it's just so funny how this plays out.
But it goes, in a new interview with
Betty Johnson, of course, typical, house oversight chairman
rep representative James Colmer revealed what may be
the most damning
development.
Yet, in the fight to uncover the truth
behind Jeffrey Epstein's sinister global sex trafficking and
blackmail network, the Epstein files may have been
already destroyed, and the federal government might be
complicit. So your bombshell development is I have
no idea, but I think things might have
happened?
Woah. That's incredible, Betty Johnson. You're nailing it.
I mean, come on, guy. And you realize
that Kash Patel just in under oath just
said that Epstein killed himself, by the way,
if we're still playing that little song and
dance, you know, in an in a location,
which I literally just said the other day,
in a facility
literally designed to stop you from being able
to kill yourself and bunk beds that are
too short to do so with a sheet
apparently that's made out of fabric soft enough
to break if you even try to tear
it. But let's pretend he did that and
jumped off the bed and killed himself. I
mean or and that the cameras all just
malfunctioned at the exact same time and the
guards went on break exact same time. I
mean, are we forgetting how dumb all that
was? Like, I absolutely insane. Here's Cas Patel.
He killed himself.
Okay. So towing the line. Don't expect anything
different. These people are lackeys.
I mean, look at what people have been
put in these positions, guys. These are people
that are so excited to be in this
position that they don't even I mean or
I mean, they're not people that I think
are going to stand up for what's right.
Poggino,
Cash, the rest of them, these guys are
guys are cartoons in my opinion, and they're
clearly showing you this stuff. They're not doing
anything of substance. It's all show.
Kohler who has so spearheaded numerous high profile
investigations
into Biden family corruption,
of course.
Only one direction this goes. And the weaponization
of federal agencies made it clear he believes
the Department of Justice no longer has the
files if they ever did. What?
So okay. So you all of you have
been telling us this is coming.
So if Comer at that point already thought
they didn't exist, why didn't he speak up
then? Why didn't they stand up and go,
well, I don't think they're coming at all
because I don't think they exist. No. No.
They all said, oh, it's coming. We're gonna
break this wide open. And then now he
goes, well, I don't even think they were
ever there to begin with.
Oh, that really lines up. That feels real
that you just kept back that nugget until
now until it was most impactful.
No longer has them if they ever existed.
Guys, this is like a this is a
they're this is like they think they're in
a TV show. This feels like a b
movie to me. Comer believes the files were
already destroyed to cover up the deep to
cover up the deep state.
And Kaylee Bundon, to cover up the deep
state.
I you know, I think it's all either
they're this
remedial
or they know the audience they're aiming at.
It says, I don't think the Department of
Justice has the Epstein files or at least
the attorney general does not have them, or
she would have turned them over, the president
ordered them released.
Oh, okay. So then explain to me why
Bondi keeps telling us that they're just about
to come out. After this, I'll play a
clip next where she says, no. No. Oh,
it's coming. No. Look. He's saying what he
thinks. Doesn't necessarily mean that's what's happening or
what she thinks.
But he's giving you insight into what he
thinks they're thinking.
That does not sound like an intelligent thing
to say to me. Attorney general ordered them
released, he says. We all know that they've
they that they have not been released. Well,
then why did they tell you in the
beginning that they were? Why did Bondi put
out phase one and go is it act
like what and test the waters until we
started going, wait a minute. This is nothing.
And she goes, oh, well, okay. Well, I've
got truckloads. That's why. We got more coming.
Hold on.
But why did they try to make it
seem as if that was what happened
if they already knew?
It's just so lazy. One of the biggest
fears which I expressed with Kash Patel, he
says, and a lot of people, including Stephen
Miller, you know, the Zionist who has every
interest in hiding the Mossad connection here, going
into the new administration was this. I hope
I hope they're not shredding documents right now.
This was a few weeks ago before transition.
The task force on the declassification of federal
secrets led by representative Amp Polina, you know,
another very intelligent person,
Polina Luna, has been relentless in the pursuit
of transparency, but Comer revealed that Luna's pretty
frustrated by the stonewalling.
Another person who keeps pretending like everything's on
track. It's all coming your way. And now
wants you to think that they're frustrated because
of stonewalling that we're not being told about
or, you know, it just it it is
a story.
But Betty Johnson breaks it all down for
you.
K. Here, the next day.
Betty Johnson.
AJ Panbani announces the FBI is diligently going
through the Epstein files.
There are tens of I'll I'll play it
for you. This is what she says.
Said yesterday to all the Epstein files. It's
really low. I won't cut in.
Basically says what you know, they were talking
yesterday and said the Epstein files might not
be there. Here's his response.
James Palmer said yesterday that all the Epstein
files are missing for.
No. No. The FBI, yeah, the FBI, they're
reviewing there are tens of thousands
of videos
of Epstein
with children or child porn.
And there are hundreds of victims,
and no one victim will ever get released.
It's just the volume, and that's what they're
going through right now. The FBI is diligently
going through that. I I haven't seen that
statement, but I'll call him later and find
out. The MRN seems to be basically Okay.
So flatly denies that.
So just my point is I don't believe
any of them. My point is, you know,
I don't take anything at face value rather.
The point is that if he's staying, well,
they're probably already gone. And she's like, no.
No. No. Okay. So if and when we
don't ever get more information about this, remember
that she was very clear. No. No. No.
We've got it. We've got it.
Okay.
Troves of child pornography and all the things
they're talking about, which doesn't surprise me. We
know what was going on in this overlap.
But are we gonna forget that Acosta and
Trump's last administration made it clear there was
a CIA Mossad connection here? And that Trump
has very clear connection with him along with
pretty much everybody that we could talk about
in this core conversation left and right?
Does that matter? Okay. Then what we're gonna
talk about is actual accountability.
Look. I get the the victim overlap is
not a that's a valid claim.
But well, I mean, let me just cut
to this.
Because I'm just gonna repeat what this said
this,
there we go.
Here's what Matt Walsh had to say about
this exact statement.
The idea that the FBI
is still going through documents six years after
the guy was arrested is just not credible.
It's I mean, that's a very easy to
understand point. The only thing we want to
know is which powerful or prominent people Epstein
was involved with.
We want the names. Six years later, they
must know the names.
I mean, it's it's doesn't take a hard
it doesn't take a, you know,
major intellect to understand how they're aiming this
at the easy to manipulate people. That's their
bread and butter. The people that will nod
along with whatever they think they're supposed to
nod along with. That's what this is aimed
at.
Cat turd, perfect example.
You mean there's ton and by the way,
what's funny is I'm making fun of him
because I think this guy's got the intellect
of a house mouse. But the point is,
ultimately,
he's still pushing back. You mean there's tens
of thousands of videos of half of Hollywood?
Or I take it back. This is a
different one. He says, you mean there's tens
of thousands of videos of half of Hollywood,
half of globalists,
which means Democrats,
and half of DC with children? We know.
Oh, you do, do you? You know something
that you've never seen that nobody's ever proven
to you. I'm not I'm not gonna dismiss
the obvious overlap. People like Dennis Hastert, for
example, third is,
I always do that. It's the second in
line of the president as the third person
president, then there's one in line, there's second
behind him. That is the speaker who was
at behind Bush. The guy was acute he
got called a serial pedophile, a serial child
bolester
by the judge who sentenced him to prison.
My point is it's not unique to left
and right. There's plenty of examples of this.
My point is you should not dismiss the
possibility
that there's people like that who are in
this in position to power, left or right.
But the fact that he says we know
that you've got thousands of videos, why would
you know that? Because that's your opinion, and
you
know your opinion
when it works for you.
These people are children, and they're out there
manipulating very, very, very large groups of people.
My point overall
is that they will never push back on
these people until it works for their interest
because they're team sport politics manipulators.
My response was to this person saying we're
going to diligently go through the files was,
oh, okay. Oh, sure. Gotcha.
Paris and cheerleaders.
Remember this? February 27, DC Draino. Today, I
met with president Trump, JD Vance, and Bondi,
and the FBI director, all involved.
They handed me a binder and copy of
the Epstein files, which were nothing of the
kind, which everybody laughed about. Most of it
was blacked out. But these guys sure as
hell sold you like it was the end
all be all gonna change the world. This
is the most transparent administration in history, he
writes.
Guys, just recognize who these people are.
That's Libs of TikTok. Right? That's DC Drano.
They're all there. It's phase
one. And as I said, oh, how cute.
They even printed little titles for you. Epstein
files phase one. Seriously?
That's embarrassing.
You're either being played or part of the
play.
Here's Kash Patel said, though. Right? So all
that's going on.
You know they've got evidence. Or even let's
just say put aside the Epstein files if
you wanna focus on what they've said before
that. All the different claims of people stealing
money from USAID,
Social Security, I mean, any number of things.
Where are all the people going to prison?
Where isn't Fauci in prison?
I'll show you why. Because this is the
old these are the only two things they
seem focused on right now. Don't forget that
Pam Bonny came out and the first two
things she did was an investigation
for October 7, which makes no sense for
America First, or an investigation around antisemitism.
Also has no bearing on America First conversation
from MAGA,
which is what I'm talk but they were
promised is the point.
Every single one of them. All Zionists, all
their they're this is what they're focused on.
Here's what Cass Patel says. Breaking out of
New York FBI. I can confirm that this
morning, our agents and partner and partners arrested
I wonder who and partners means. Interesting.
Maybe it means police. Maybe not. Maybe it's
Batar USA.
Arrested an individual on charges related to three
separate violent assaults of Jewish Americans.
The subject had allegedly targeted Jewish citizens during
multiple protests of the Israel Gaza war on
three separate occasions over nine months.
Very intensive investigation for something that could be
easily handled by local police.
Based on the allegations, the subject will be
charged with hate crimes. Oh, well, guys, look
at that. I thought we all agreed hate
crimes were nothing and that there was a
lie that crimes are crimes. Hate crimes are
a manufactured lie.
You don't you don't is it a hate
crime is something you add to make it
seem as if so if you violently attack
somebody,
that's a crime. But if they claim you
did it because you hate their religion, woah.
That's a much more serious crime. Why? The
crime is the crime. Everything else is a
lens you put over it. And many times,
you could be lying about that. Now I'm
not gonna I I would I actually would
agree that racially motivated crimes are pretty disgusting.
Doesn't change the fact that under the law,
we should be equal under the that come
that overlaps with the idea of beliefs and
free speech and everything else. The crime is
where the line is. And they broke the
law? Charge them with the crime. Now he's
telling you hate speech. That means,
woke, guys. That is cancel culture ideological
manipulation.
The recent spike in violent crime against Jewish
citizens is deeply disturbing, except it doesn't exist.
Remember? We already proven this. There have been
multiple in fact, I think peer reviewed science
on this, or rather, I should say study,
that,
Greenblatt got caught. The ADL got caught. They
got caught and were exposed for making just
and they even admitted this. Anything Palestinian, a
protest for Palestine, was deemed antisemitic, which then
they claimed was a Jewish,
a a a crime against Jewish society or
citizens.
But it says, and this FBI will continue
to pursue those reasonable responsible. Excuse me. We
will have more to say soon. We're so
overall,
I'm willing to bet you anything when this
develops that it was not a violent assault.
It was a
claim that they were saying these things.
But even if it was a violent assault,
then charge them for violence. That is not
an FBI investigation
unless it's for Israel, and then we understand
why this is happening. On top of that,
what somebody said, which I think is a
very, very valid point,
and this is Eli,
Eliash Schaefer.
Just e, I believe. He's a conservative. Right?
Yeah. Gateway Pundit.
Here's what he says. So these are American
citizens or Jewish citizens.
Never heard anyone describe someone as a Christian
citizen.
This is all too bizarre. You know you're
a fraud, Cash, and you're black or you're
blackmailed. Funny how they always give them that
out. You and Pam are absolutely a tragic
disappointment.
He's a that's a very valid point. Why
are you discussing this as Jewish citizens down
here? Wouldn't that be American citizens? Now I'm
not saying that's about that is about the
whole point is to get people to jump
at the idea that Jewish people are the
influence as opposed to Zionism. Even though, yes,
there's an obvious overlap. But there's also an
obvious overlap with Jew Christian Zionism or even
Zionist atheists that exist in Israel and are
quite prominent, in fact. I know that always
spins people out, but look it up. It
exposes the whole ploy.
The bottom line, guys, is ask yourself why
this is what they're focusing time on. With
everything else that you guys were promised, this
is what how do you not see what's
happening by now?
This is a co opted country. This is
obvious, and people all over the world are
calling it out. And even people like judge
Napolitano, people like Jeffrey Sachs, people are coming
out left and right to tell you it's
not about some racist overlap. It's about a
government who has completely influenced this government.
Daniel McAdams, to make that point even more
clear, highlights what Marco Rubio said. He says,
we are reviewing the visa status, which I'll
talk about more tomorrow,
of the trespassers and vandals who took over
Columbia University's library. So they are still focusing
back on that conversation.
Pearl Hamas thugs are no longer welcome in
our nation. Oh, okay. So all you're saying
is you're not allowed to protest if it's
against Israel. Because you realize there are people
all over. The right has done this in
response to plenty of different things.
There's protests all over the place. Now if
you argue that what they did was illegal,
then they you could charge them with trespassing
because that's the best you could do. There
was no violence in this conversation. And there
were Jewish and Muslim and Christian people that
were celebrating together and and protesting at the
same time, celebrating as the point they were
there over Passover. And so they celebrated Jewish
holiday with all the antisemites, apparently.
The point overall, as
Daniel says, people who protest Israel's genocide of
Palestinian civilians are not pro Hamas thugs.
That is a language of Hitler.
But you realize they know what they're doing.
If they just always make it pro Hamas
thugs, it begins an easy talking point to
people that don't care about the truth, but
it also makes them sound like they're violent
even though there was no violence to speak
of. Same point here when speaker Johnson does
exactly the same thing and captions what he
says
and said and and also let's realize they're
saying reviewing the visa status.
So that's all they're doing. They're gonna say,
we're gonna not review. We're gonna yank your
visa because Israel showed us you were to
protest against Israel. That's not even being made
up. That's what Qatar US and these other
Zionist groups have been proudly promoting. Khalil was
the first one. They gave them that list.
It's all on the record.
So he's saying we're gonna illegally, with no
process, remove their visas
and kick them out of the country.
They have,
as every other conversation we've had, the right
to somebody's what what crime are you being
accused of?
There's no criminal record here. They're not breaking
the law.
See, the the idea they can just provoke
that is not the reality of the law
despite all the screaming lies of people that
are too immature to admit it.
But speaker Johnson says, attention, Prohomos Rioters.
Yes. It just goes to how cartoonish this
all is. That they these people are grown
men who have to knowingly continue to use
the same kind of hyperbolic language that Israel
was during the entirety of their ongoing genocide.
Right? Pro Hamas rioters,
rape t excuse me, rape terror dungeons,
even though none of that actually happened and
you could prove that today.
They did it for a reason, so that
became the narrative. The same thing these complete
children are doing. Attention, pro Hamas rioters.
Even though they were Palestinian protesters that did
not riot on college campuses across the country,
you're on notice.
So he's doing Israel's bidding yet again. America
will no longer tolerate your anti Semitic violence.
Ah, is it violent because they have the
ideas you claim are anti Semitic? Well, they
sure as hell didn't do anything violent.
Destruction, harassment, intimidation,
that is the narrative that we have disproven
400 times over. Here we are.
That's the point, guys. Now that'll overlap with
the conversation of surveillance, which which if I
was gonna make it longer today, we would
get into the overlap of the visa conversation.
We'll do that tomorrow. But let's fold this
in. So they're using this conversation of going
after people for Israel, even though they are
doing that. But they're using that for their
side of it to continue to build out
the biometric surveillance.
I mean, I don't even know what the
right word for for what we're about. I
I I think there is not a word
that truly
encapsulates
what this is becoming.
Now what I framed it after was the
term that was used in this,
the supercharged
surveillance,
you know, biometric database.
But you tell me. I mean, this this
is becoming something that is not even about
The United States anymore. This is about a
global surveillance dynamic, and that has to really
I think it needs to really impress upon
us the gravity of the
situation. So we already showed you some of
these. Right? And this is just a few
of them. I'm there I could do I
could talk for twenty minutes about the different
examples we've seen just since the current administration,
but even going back into Biden's and even
before that, where they have been building this.
Because,
in fact, one of the other ones I
was showing
was,
how what was that about? That was an
in Intercept article from 02/2017.
Let me see if I can grab it,
actually.
What was it?
So, basically, the intercept 02/2017,
that didn't pop up. But I've I've covered
it before. The bottom line is Trump's last
administration allowed Palantir to take over police databases
back then. Okay? So add that to the
list we're gonna show you. So here's twenty
twenty five, April. Palantir helping DOGE with IRS.
So understand what these show you, and we've
gone through these in-depth.
They had siloed aspects of information for privacy
and concern. They just ripped that apart. They've
dumped it into one central idea. They're that
they're using the a central database, and they're
the basically, the siloed information has been removed,
right,
in regard to these different locations. Now they
are centralized. They've admitted that. On top of
that, they're using that information to train their
large language models and their AI. They've also
been very pretty I mean,
it was called out in congress. I shouldn't
say they've been very clear about it, but
they have admitted it.
We we even the GSAI bot is a
bot they're using to facilitate it, but they're
scooping up information every second.
Privacy concerns, foreign foreign policy concerns with whatever
governments are influencing or accessing this information, where
there's no ethics pledges from the very beginning,
so there's no reason to think they even
care about the law. And they've shown you
the law doesn't matter.
Palantir is helping with a massive IRS data
project. So scooping up all that information from
the IRS.
We have the example from RFK and his
medical side of it. Right? That we're gonna
use scoop up all the Oracle medical data,
but we're also gonna use the autism database.
We're gonna scoop up everything we can. And
when they accentuated
the point,
medication records from pharmacy chains, lab testing, genomics
data from patients treated by the Department of
Veterans Affairs, claims from private insurers,
data from your smartwatches, your fitness trackers, all
linked together.
So when you bought that Apple Watch, did
you realize they were gonna scoop it all
into one central database and watch what you're
doing? Yeah. Because they always do. That's happening
from Maha.
K. Then we have Palantir OS, right, from
the immigration side of it. Fuels Trump administration's
immigrant removal agenda. All I mean, that is
happening, but you have to realize it's multifaceted.
So I think the immigration part of it
is a means to an end, but that's
part of what Israel's manufacturing as well. So
understand this is all continuing. That's April 2021.
Now here is where we bring it into
the overlap. And again, I like I said,
there's many more examples we could fold into
that. What Doge has been doing from the
beginning, I think, is a complete shell game.
It was about one thing, and they were
making you think about something else.
They're building this out in front of you.
Biometricupdate.com
says DOGE's infiltration
into core of federal biometrics management
sets off alarms, May 7. The Trump administration's
Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE, has now insinuated
itself
into the Department of Homeland Security's DHS
Office of Biometric Identity Management, the OBIM,
one of the federal government's most sensitive and
sensitive agencies. And
the point
rather the thing to consider is what is
how does this make sense with the stated
vision, the mission of Doge?
Right? Well, I mean, I'm sure they could
contort it into, well, we need biometrics to
better facilitate or in make efficient or immigration,
you know, whatever. But it it doesn't actually
meet what they claim they're doing. To me,
this is not about Doge trying to make
more efficient the OBIM.
It's about them and Doge whatever it really
is doing. Consolidating information for whatever technocratic control
structure that Kathmand has been telling you they've
been building for a long time. Now they're
showing you. They're literally now folding themselves into
the biometric identity management aspect of the federal
government. Now it says, and what do you
think they're scooping up using the immigration discussion?
Your iris scans, your facial scans, and they're
building a wall to do all of it.
It says, once a relatively obscure but essential
component of the DHS, which serves the Department
of Justice, Pentagon, intelligence community, all of which
now Doge has access to, which then I
argue means Israel does as well, if they
didn't already. The OBIM is now under new
scrutiny as Doge, which has a broad and
shadowy mission to ostensibly
streamline
federal operations and assert greater executive oversight
from over digital infrastructure.
The the one of the main things of
the way we pretend our government operates is
that you do not get
greater oversight or greater consolidation from any one
branch. We have watched this happen rapidly,
and tomorrow, I'll go more over the the
screaming lies of people like Stephen Miller about
a judicial coup.
When what you can see, if you wanna
find a judicial coup, is what happened in
Honduras, what happened in El Salvador at the
behest of the US government or with their
involvement, or plenty of other places, in Israel,
for example. But what we're talking about here,
whether politically motivated or not, are judges who
are pushing back on things that are flatly
unconstitutional, and they call it a coup because
they want to accomplish it.
It's just it's insane to me how clear
it is, and that's people are breaking the
law everywhere. It doesn't mean these judges don't
also lie or the clear point though is
you can prove as I've done every day
we've talked about it.
That you're being lied to. And it's for
very obvious reasons.
So it goes on to say,
Doge's infiltration of the OBIM is raising serious
and legitimate questions about what it intends to
do with The United States' principal biometric surveillance
architecture.
What we damn well know. I mean, guys,
it couldn't be more obvious.
I'll get more into it if you don't
know by now as we go past this.
The OBIM manages one of the largest biometric
identity systems in the world.
It's not just about The US. Supporting
border enforcement,
visa applications,
immigration and ad adjudications, law enforcement, and intelligence
functions by maintaining a massive biometric repository of
fingerprints, facial recognition scans, and iris data.
Its legacy system, the automated biometric identification system
or iDent,
stores more than 300,000,000
biometric records and routinely handles hundreds of thousands
of queries daily.
Despite its age, IDENT remains a cornerstone at
the moment of The US homeland security infrastructure,
relied upon not only by the DHS, but
also by other federal,
departments and even international
partners.
That's very interesting.
So
as this builds, it becomes a international
databank.
In recent weeks, three individuals,
one currently with the DHS and two more
familiar with the on the with the matter,
have now confirmed to the platform that DOGE
has now embedded itself in the in the
OBIM, the biometric database.
Now FedScoop this is according to FedScoop reporting
this. Two of these sources reported that DOGE
is pushing to revive
in internal core, conversations
around the long delayed
and politically sensitive
Homeland
Advanced
Recognition Technology,
known as HEART,
something that was rolled out, sort of like
total information awareness, that got kinda pushed back
and, you know, it stalled 2018, '20 '20
'2.
And now,
whether we like it or not is what
I see coming. I don't even think they're
gonna ask. And, frankly, I don't think it
matters at this point. I think it's already
happened. This is just them instituting what we
know.
Meant to replace ident,
that's originally how it goes. Right? So they
they introduced
the the homeland advanced re re recognition technology
to replace ident, to bring it into the
cloud based new service that they all want
to break out.
Rather, you know, that's the whole narrative of
what they're trying to do. Make it more
efficient to bring it into the technological advancement.
Hart was envisioned as more modern cloud hosted
biometric system capable of sophisticated identity matching without
the burdens
of aging hardware dependencies.
However, Hart has struggled for years with implementation
challenges,
cost overruns,
and internal controversy,
leaving its future uncertain.
All those are true. The controversy is obvious
for these people. There's concerns about obvious privacy,
which we'll get into. But really just the
idea that these were, you know, maybe too
early to try to implement it. We're now
at the technological point where they can or
maybe they're ready for it. Doge's presence at
OBIM is not merely observational.
One DHS source reportedly stated that Doge recently
requested a detailed memo
examining the future of HEART,
iDENT, and the travel verification service.
Why?
TVS is a separate biometric system operated by
US Customs of Border Control for use at
ports of entry and airports. Okay. So if
DOGE's direction is about making things more efficient,
why are they investigating these plan? You know
what? It's very clear.
Doge is simply another arm of Trump's administration.
That's all this is. And they are effectively
carrying out agendas when that has been the
whole point was that they are simply supposed
to be advising when in reality, you see
them stepping in and demanding information about this
is not a and what they're doing is
collecting information around the biometric immigration discussion.
None of that, in my opinion, has anything
to do with them other with, like,
making this work more efficiently in the context
of
I saving money. I well, let let's put
it this way. One of the main issues
with heart was the financial issue. Now this
is becoming the focal point. So it's not
about saving anything. It's about initiating
the control structure through the justification of changing
for better.
That's how I read it anyway. Please look
into it for yourself. What I think is
very fascinating is what DOGE is doing right
here, detailed memos explaining the different overlaps and
how it will be used and where it
goes forward, does not seem like what their
mandate is.
It is when you realize that their job
is simply to roll out the technocratic control
structure using an artificial intelligence under a guise
of making it more efficient as a nod
right back to the efficiency movement of Technocracy
Inc and Elon's grandfather.
Who, by the way, weirdly enough, in an
interview, his father anyway, just said that he
gave STARLINK to Hamas, which I think is
such a weird thing to say. The HEART
initiative has been a particular flashpoint with DHS,
initially proposed as a next generation solution
to iDent's aging infrastructure.
See? That's, I mean, that's how all these
things go.
They see something on the decline. They rationalize
why you should why you know, basically, get
you to call for what they want to
happen.
It says HEART was designed to shift biometric
identity management to the cloud and utilize modular
software driven architecture. However, its promise has been
mired in missteps.
A 2022 attempt
to deploy HEART in parallel operations
with IDENT
meant to allow side by side performance evaluations
collapse due to technical shortcomings.
In 2023,
the Government Accountability Office had flagged serious issues
related to privacy compliance,
program oversight,
budget transparency.
The program's cost ballooned far beyond original projections
and key components remained years behind schedule. Sure.
Sounds like the efficient direction we should be
taking. Right? Instead of relying on a single
contractor, the program was diversified across multiple vendors
and internal,
federal technical personnel were given a larger role.
Now I I highlighted that because I'm willing
to bet you anything.
Once this gets pointed to, it'll become very
clear that it is Palantir,
you know, whatever. Doge, XAI, whatever whatever makes
sense for where they use this.
It will become their people as opposed to
the diversification of multiple which if you do
that, it makes it
harder to control.
But let's remember,
bo blooming or ballooning
costs,
privacy issues, program oversight, all the things that
they claim
I mean, so far, soda don't matter. In
the conversation of Doge, they made clear that,
well, we'll consider privacy, but, you know, like,
as an afterthought. Right in the beginning, the
it's taking away the silent information and bringing
them all together. The first concern was that
this is gonna risk privacy. And they said,
well, we'll we'll deal when we get there.
It was a leaked discussion, so I don't
think they realized they were being so seen
to be so blind about it, but they
don't care.
Doge has also initiated efforts to build a
master database, and here we are,
capable of integrating information from the SSA, the
IRS, state voter rolls, and various DHS systems.
So, again, every step is more and more
and more consolidating it all into one central
place, which is the exact opposite of what
people demand for privacy.
But it sure as hell makes it easier
for somebody else to tap in whenever they
want. The idea that a politically aligned office
like DOGE could help steer the direction of
biometric surveillance introduces both ethical and strategic questions.
The IDENT system, for all of its limitations,
was developed and maintained under long standing federal
norms around privacy data use, integrate interagency controls.
It's not at all clear whether DOE abides
by federal privacy laws. I think it's pretty
obvious they don't as its internal workings are
not transparent, which is obviously the opposite of
what they're projecting.
The point overall,
whether they actually cared about the privacy norms
before, at least they were stated in there
and at least tried to feign to care
about them. At this point, they're just making
they're just rushing forward with everything they're doing
and acting like none of these things even
bind their choices because, well, we have a
mandate.
As if you you know, the the the
dumbest people out there are the ones saying
that they don't even realize that's not carte
blanche, guy. They don't just do whatever they
want. I mean, you would say the same
about Biden, wouldn't you? It's just funny how
they can't think past these things. The consolidation
of federal biometric capabilities under a single
executive aligned architecture
would represent a major inflection point in the
history of the American identity infrastructure
and citizen surveillance.
That's not a good thing.
It's just it's so transparently clear. This is
about the consolidation
in the exact ways that we've always pushed
back on.
So that was from May 7.
Here,
under this is from the surveillanceresistancelab.org.
Heart attack, h a r t. How DHS's
massive biometric database will supercharge surveillance and threaten
rights.
So The US and that's this weird
document, which you can check out right here.
Read through it. 60 pages. Goes through all
the breakdown.
The US Department of Homeland Security is building
a $6,158,000,000
next wave biometric database
that will vastly expand its surveillance capabilities and
supercharge
the deportation system.
So you can see where this all goes.
The Homeland Advance Recognition Technology System,
today, under the guise of that, yesterday, under
something else, COVID nineteen, you know, it's always
whatever the new thing is, it's rationalizing whatever
agenda they've already wanted.
We'll collect, organize, and share invasive data on
over 270,000,000
people, including juveniles, that the number projected to
grow significantly. Remember, they've made clear this is
overlapping with the world stuff as well. This
data will come from federal agencies, including DHS,
the FBI, as well as local and state
police, foreign governments.
At what point did we just stop caring
about how rapidly they this used to be
a huge deal.
They never there's no legal reality why we
didn't vote for this for your facial scans.
It's rationalized international security just like everything else.
Powered by military grade technologies,
Hart will aggregate and compare biometric data, including
facial recognition, DNA.
Is that their right to take from you?
Ira iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints,
more often gathered without obtaining consent or warrant.
This will allow DHS to target immigrants for
surveillance or really anybody else, guys. Raids,
arrest, detention, deportation,
heart could be used to identify people in
public spaces. You realize that's what Palantir and
Israel are doing right now in Gaza and
have been for a long time, creating chilling
consequences of people's rights to protest, which we're
currently seeing, in fact, to assemble, to associate,
to live their daily lives. Hart threatens to
violate human and privacy rights at an exponential
rate,
particularly in black, brown, and immigrant communities already
facing discriminatory policing and surveillance.
Despite the terrifying risks, Hart remains a black
box shrouded in secrecy with virtually no oversight
and accountability mechanisms.
You know, exactly the opposite of what they
project.
Although only in phase one of its development,
Hart has become now this is not brand
new. Right? This is this is we're in
we're in the new phase of this right
now.
Hart has become vastly more expensive than anticipated,
generating massive revenues for first, Northrop Grumman, of
course. Now that's gonna be probably Palantir, the
current iteration I argue.
And it says, and now Veritas Capital, a
billionaire private equity firm, while troubling questions over
its privacy and human rights violations remain. Congress
continues to fund Hart even though it has
failed to meet every milestone in its government
contract.
Our report explains the dangers of Hart by
driving into the system's mechanisms,
costs, and biometric and biographic
data sources.
We spotlight the companies profiting from HEART's development
and the agencies, private companies, and foreign governments
that will contribute to and access its data.
We outlined the short and long term civil
privacy and human right risks.
The underlying role and impact of part will
be to turbocharge DHS's unchecked power to approve
or deny immigration benefits, assemble target list for
ICE raids, expand the tech border wall, and
to facilitate surveillance, arrest, immigration, detentions, deportation, or,
you know, whatever they apply to the current
thing they're focusing on. Maybe you saying word
mean things about Israel.
For such reasons, we call DHS to dismantle
HEART. We also call on congress to freeze
the funds
dedicated to it.
HEART presents unacceptable risks and dangers. We'll powerfully
expand the surveillance capabilities.
HEART's so called redress measures are effectively nonexistent,
leaving people with almost no way to challenge
content in the massive databases, access their information,
or correct errors in their data. Welcome to
the artificial intelligence age where whatever they decide
is the is the truth, regardless of what
you could prove.
This is where it all goes.
Now as Hackable Animal points out, Palantir Technology
and xAI
have now partnered
along with TWG Global to leverage AI in
the financial services industry. Great. So now there's
one more angle to it, guys. IRS,
immigration,
health. Right? It's it's literally the the most
the most rapid consolidation of control that I've
ever seen.
Just like with COVID and financial,
it's happening to you right
now. He says, hot off the presses. Now
Thiel and Musk have united once again on
financial services from PayPal to the new Xi
Palantir, the the TWG partnership. Who will be
running CBDCs? Gee, I wonder. Now it could
be somebody else, but it's a good point
to point that's probably where it will come
from. But as always, we look into it
for ourselves. Musk's x AI joins TWG Global
Palantir for AI push in financial sector, May
6.
So the obvious point,
total information awareness was a government program.
They got pushed back, so they, quote,
stopped it
until they roll it into a private entity,
and that became Palantir. It's what it is.
Even even the first what In Q Tel
was the first funding contract, which was CIA.
I mean, it's it's the obvious here, guys.
Same point for XAI. Don't forget.
I as far as I could tell, I'm
one of the very few that have been
covering this from this is 12/24/2024.
The quiet transition from DARPA's xAI to Elon's
xAI. You can quite literally prove that DARPA
ended its xAI, which meant explainable AI program
right before Elon took over Twitter, turned it
into x, and started xAI as a totally
new thing.
We're watching the new thing happen again. And
now on top of that, we're watching those
two things jam together. Before even that, though,
let's not forget that x and xAI have
merged into one thing. So now Twitter is
part of Palantir,
or at least joining as one direction. The
Palantir and x and x AI are all
linear right now. They're all joined in the
same direction, and they're using your data from
x Twitter to train these models, which they've
already been open about.
And then this may matter to you. But
if you can't see how much these groups
are suddenly just consolidating control over your life,
I just I don't know what else to
show you. It's right in front of you.
These people are not acting in your interest,
especially since they're currently working alongside Israel to
commit a genocide.
And Alice Karp seems to be gleeful about
how they kill people.
Just in case you haven't seen it. Oh,
there's one that I forgot to include, actually.
Here this is the pal tears Palin teals
Palantir
strategic partnership.
There's carp there's teal
partnering with Israel in January 2024 imagine that
in the midst of the genocide.
Here's the one that I actually forgot to
grab.
This was Palantir's leaked plan to help ICE
support people. That was the immigration OS, but
this has more information coming from four zero
four media.
So
it says the collaboration will integrate XAI's models.
So the data they've been scooping from your
freely giving up whatever you say on on
the platform,
which includes its Grok family of large language
models, exactly what I'm talking about, and its
Colossus supercomputer
into business operations.
The comp companies expect many more partners after
the inclusion of XAI.
K. So just understand, the collaboration will integrate
XAI, which is now which is now one
and the same Twitter
with
Palantir, TGW or TWG. Excuse me. In March,
Nvidia
and XAI
joined a consortium backed by Microsoft
and BlackRock.
It's just it's just insane. Are you are
we really gonna pretend right now that it's
not a big deal or it wouldn't be
if this was a democrat run company
that he is joining with Microsoft,
BlackRock,
and Palantir
and using all of your information in the
process. I guess Microsoft and Gates and BlackRock
are all okay as long as there's not
a d next to his name.
Just such just lazy, lazy, hypocr hypocrisy. It's
obvious those things logically, it should matter.
Matters to me.
Doesn't matter whether it's left and right. That's
the point. It matters because it matters.
And, of course,
Musk's
most alarming power grab. Now you won't be
surprised to find out that Derek wrote about
this all the way back in December 2024.
You can't hide. Elon Musk's
and SpaceX
are helping the US intelligence build the world's
largest satellite spy satellite network. Now this was
before Trump took over,
Had been going on, so he was a
contractor for Biden's administration.
And then just did the same for Trump
because, you know, totally. It's okay for him
to work for the pedophile deep state as
long as he's making good money. Right?
I'm being facetious, obviously. That's the absurdity of
making these all in one narratives about how
these you know, he's part of the new
state. Okay. Then how does that make sense?
Explain that for me.
The point is that this is now being
pointed out by the Atlantic.
There's some additional points to it.
But it says, when Elon Musk's engineers
bundled a batch of prototype
prototype satellites into a rocket's nose cone six
years ago, there were fewer than 2,000 functional
satellites in Earth's orbit.
Many more would soon be on the way.
All through the pandemic
and the years that followed, Musk's company SpaceX
kept launching them while everybody else stopped. Feels
like he was given special permission.
More than 7,000 of his satellites now surround
Earth like a cloud of of gnats.
This fleet, which works to provide space based
Internet service to the ground, dwarfs
those of all
other private companies
and other countries
put together.
Like, real and it'll make us more clear,
but just right there, take a second and
think about that kind of influence and control.
You're not only the richest man in the
in the planet, if that's to be believed.
You have more satellites by a factor of
fifth twenty in in in this in space,
And you currently have more in general
than all private companies in K and other
countries combined.
And and that's why they are rapidly going
in the direction of using this for everything.
You don't think that gives him control over
just
data,
information, communication to a point that is almost
terrifying
with what we've seen him do?
Even just for a petty,
childish perspective.
It says, and almost every week, Musk adds
to it, flinging dozens more satellites into the
sky.
It says, in the not so distant future,
an expanded version of this system, or one
very much like it, could overtake broadband, so
it's talking about star Starlink and its satellite
network,
could overtake broadband
as the Internet's backbone.
So not only just a cornering the market
on just information and phones and ex and
any kind of data sharing, but ultimately, potentially
just the Internet itself.
I mean, you think you're having control over
Twitter gives him think think about what that
could mean.
And look. Let's be clear. This is not
Republican, Elon. I don't care who we're talking
about. One person who is politically active or
motivated or in the government should not have
this kind of control. But you have to
understand, this has been building from Biden's into
Trump's. It's not a left right dynamic. It's
about getting you trapped in the left right
paradigm so this happens without you paying attention.
It says the majority of our communications
alright. It says a decade or two from
now, it could be among our most crucial
information infrastructure, Elon Musk's Starlink.
The majority of our communications, our entertainment, our
global commerce might be beamed back and forth
between satellites and the Earth through Starlink
is the point. If Musk
continues to dominate the launchers that take satellites
to space and the satellites themselves, by the
way,
and the Internet surfaces services operate up there,
he could end up with more power over
the human exchange of information
than any person who has ever lived.
Absorb that for a
second. This this is this is not even
remotely
hyperbolic
or or alarmist.
I mean,
I mean, we've talked about the satellite point,
but I for me, I didn't I I
don't even know why I didn't necessarily connect
this when I talked about it last time.
I mean, I guess I thought because maybe
it would the the globe wouldn't necessarily allow,
but it seems as if that's happening.
So that that needs to show you, like,
another lockstep
kind of overlap here.
President Donald Trump has just delayed, and this
is important as well, a $42,000,000,000
federal effort to expand broadband services. You know
why?
Especially in rural areas, he says. His administration
has decided to make that project tech neutral,
such as the cable hookups aren't necessarily preferred
over satellite, which means Starlink can compete for
the money, which I think if you're not
stupid, you understand that means it's probably gonna
go to Starlink. Not my opinion, but you
see how these things work. Like, you give
the you give the appearance of some kind
of fair situation, and then they just dump
it all in his in
the obvious because they're gonna claim it's better
and it's what people want and blah blah
blah. Maybe it's the truth. The point though,
you already had a thing going forward with
this, which most of Americans use, and you
pull back on it to allow
the other option. That
may not be nefarious, but I think you
have to see where this stuff goes. In
Gaza, Medics have used Starlink while healing the
wounded.
At times, when the people of Myanmar and
Sudan learned that their Internet had been shut
off by their autor autocratic governments, they turn
to Starlink. Ukraine Soldiers use it to communicate
in front lines. Okay. Yeah. This sure sounds
nice if you paint it that way. Now
here's another way you could look at it.
Israel has been using Starlink
along with Palantir
over Gaza for all sorts of other nefarious
purposes.
In Myanmar and Sudan,
the governments that have created the despotic situation
are backed by Israel and United States, and
they've allowed that to be the justification for
why Starlink was deployed in yet another military
zone. In Ukraine, the exact same point. And
it's even come to the point to where
he pretends he doesn't want Ukraine using it,
but never really stopped them from using it.
What about Honduras
where they deployed Starlink after they basically threw
an illegal coup to control of the government
and deployed Prospera through Thiel's back company who
is currently growing and taking over parts of
Honduras? What about in El Salvador or any
number of places where they view every single
time? What do you notice a pattern?
War.
With every single time we've seen this, when
they're in a war zone, you see this
delivered. Now, yeah, maybe it's giving some people
Internet,
but I see it sort of as the
Neuralink given this guy the most use of
his arms, but it's also enslaving humanity. Right?
That is where I see that going. This
is not about helping people.
That's my opinion.
I think what you can clearly see is
this is the central link between this over
this growing technocratic control structure. The biometric surveillance
network and the Starlink is the central linchpin,
and it's being justified and rolled out all
over the place, but realize it's not about
helping.
If it's being used in places for in
for basically control and surveillance, it's not about
you
or about helping you. Musk's ability to deliver
this crucial service and look, to be clear
again, I hope I'm wrong.
I will jump up and down praising everything
if it turns out that what we see
coming is not happening. This is not some
willful decision to see the worst in it.
I this is what I believe is what
is happening based on all the facts, not
partisan left or right, but just the full
breadth of it. And I could be wrong.
I hope I am. Musk's ability to deliver
this crucial service,
the ability to coordinate action in conflict zones
see, it's not see, it's right there is
exactly the point. The ability to coordinate action
in conflict zones
or everything else
has given him unprecedented geopolitical leverage for a
private citizen.
Yes. Even now.
Reportedly, Pentagon officials have already had to go
hat in hand to Elon Musk after he
threatened to restrict Sterling's service to Ukrainian troops
who were using it to launch attacks to
Russia. Now, yes, they give you the whole
back and forth where he was conflicted about
the war. What ultimately happened? Narrative aside,
Ukraine was using it for military purposes. The
Pentagon needed that, so he let them use
it. That's what happened. All the rest is
narrative.
He is not merely a mogul, Kimberly,
Siverson
Burke, a director at quality
what does it say? Quilt qual is it
q t l e space? I can't read
that. It's I have it on a screenshot,
if you don't notice, for the podcast because
we always lose the highlighting for some reason
on the articles, which I started taking screenshots
for. But it goes on to say,
an aerospace research firm. This is someone who
can flip a switch
and decide the outcome of a war.
That's right now, you understand? So wait just
wait until this becomes the ubiquitous
Internet communication
medium.
And then and then ask yourself how that,
on top of having most money over anybody
on the planet and most influence over anybody
on the planet, can somehow I mean, he
might as well become the king of the
world. I mean, it's without even batting an
eye.
I'm not trying to be facetious, guys. I
mean, this is this is a a lot.
That's I mean, again, the article is entitled
Elon Musk's most alarming power grab. Again, don't
forget that Derek wrote about this 2024.
The newest ones weigh more than and this
is about the satellites, weigh more than half
a ton.
And once their solar panel wings unfurl, they
measure about a hundred feet across. The company
can reportedly manufacture at least four of these
a day.
And SpaceX's
reusable
reusable Falcon nine rocket can hold more than
25 of them at once,
all folded up inside its nose cone. So
let me so at the very least, you
could arguably say that they're sending four of
these a day.
I don't think it's happening, but I'm saying,
like, realizing it comparatively to other people, Musk
is able to launch these bundles of satellites
at a gatling gun pace, while his competitors
operate at musket speed with rockets that must
be rebuilt from scratch each time. Last year,
SpaceX successfully lofted a 33
rockets into orbit, and more than 60%
of them were carrying Starlink satellites.
Now there's a whole thing to be con
talk about there, whether there's plenty more
payloads going up with these things than we
realize.
Every one of Musk's commercial competitors and also
every nation's military combined
launched fewer rockets than he did.
One man,
Technically, not even part technically, he's a civilian,
even though that's not true in every context
as he's a military contractor. He's part of
the government. I mean, this is a game
to keep him somehow seeming like he's this
bumbling doofus that has no idea. I mean,
I'm not saying I necessarily have him in
the highest regard and until in the way
the the end of the day, either he's
being used in this role or he is
doing it. The clear reality is that Elon
Musk and what he's rolling out
is something we should be concerned about.
Now, I mean, even if he has the
best of intentions, this is a consolidation of
power just like with the data part of
it that should never be allowed
for anybody.
We used to all agree on that.
It says Starlink's largest com commercial competitor in
it's one web.
One web has more than 600 satellites compared
to Musk's more than 7,000.
And, of course, if he if he's making
five a day and going up every week,
they're he they're gonna continue to rapidly grow
beyond that to the point to where nobody
can even compete.
Separately, European Union nations have spent years planning
the construction of a dedicated network of satellites
for military and civilian use. But this project
was recently dealt a blow
when Giorgio Gi Maloney,
Italy's prime minister and friend of Musk,
announced that she now prefers a deal with
Starlink.
You see how these things work? So look.
Very just that very well in itself could
be sort of a little mini coup right
there in the context. I'm not even saying
whether she the election or who was the
point is got the per he influenced the
person who by means of manipulation or just
by organic nature made it or made her
way into power, and then just goes, okay.
Now we're going in this direction.
Or maybe it all just happened because they
think it's better. I can't stop seeing how
regardless of the the the guiding force, it
is consolidating in a rapid way.
The US government too would have gone would
have good reasons to avoid
full dependence on Musk's company for access to
the space based Internet.
The American military
has an orbital network of military grade satellites
that allows for secure government communications and reconnaissance,
but this too is a Musk product.
SpaceX builds the satellites and ferries them to
orbit.
Military,
civilian, communication,
data collection.
This is insane. The Pentagon's leaders know this
is a problem, obviously.
Or at least they did.
During the end of the Biden administration, the
US Space Force published a new strategy that
ordered the policymakers to avoid overreliance
on any single company.
Now that's I mean, regardless of who, that's
an obvious basic logic point, but that was
before
the defense department came out of the control
of Donald Trump, whose victorious
campaign received more than 250,000,000
in support from Musk. When I when it
says when I wrote to the Pentagon to
ask whether avoiding overreliance
on one particular on one provider was still
a priority, he didn't even hear back.
But all of the aspiring competitors to Starlink,
of all of them, the most formidable
is Amazon.
So as always, if there was even going
to be a competitor, it would end up
being Amazon anyway, guys. So this is the
false binary within false binary. The point overall
is that we're already going in this direction.
And if your best choice is between Amazon
or Starlink,
the people have already been convinced that he's
the freedom fighting the deep state. Pretty seems
pretty clear where this goes. But Amazon's there
just in case for good measure.
Incredible. Now it says Starlink will soon be
the largest Internet provider of any kind in
the world.
Same point.
Musk received recently secured permission from the FCC
to offer
cell phone service.
Internet, cell phone service, data collection. I mean,
you just run down the list. There is
literally no point at which this is not
involved,
or at least striving to be involved.
The space Internet of the future may become
the central way that we communicate with one
another as human beings.
Information of every kind, including the most sensitive
kinds, will flow through
it. Whoever controls it will have a great
deal of power over all of us. Now
that is the understatement of the century.
I hope people can understand the severity of
that, whether it is,
you know, whoever it is. And again, highlight
that Derek wrote this back then. You know,
it's twenty December twenty twenty four, but, you
know, way ahead of this. Now I just
wanna show you again this video.
If you guys can see that. Yeah. So
this remember this
is Elon Musk's. It's you know, it's a
graphic, obviously, you know, a video made, but
this is in 2019,
not even that long ago. This is what
the satellites look like.
And you can see down here, March, April,
not it's up now. It's gonna be September,
October, November, December. Now it's 2021.
Look at how rapidly this grows, guys. Look
at the satellites.
Now we're 2022.
Those are Starlink.
Now we're 2023.
That's your world right now.
2024.
That's not a joke, guys. That's we just
read through it. That that is Starlink.
That terrifies me. Like, the idea of like,
I feel claustrophobic.
I just hope people can recognize this.
Now next article, May 7.
US pushes nations facing tariffs
to approve Musk Starlink. Well, look at that.
Washington Post reports. There's two points to this.
One, that they're basically using the financial dynamic
to force in Starlink in countries that may
not want it, but on top of that,
that ultimately
removing tariffs from Starlink. So even as they
make the argument where it's like, well, we're
not forcing them. They're making it more financially
lucrative or financially,
it works better for them if they go
with the group that won't be getting tariffs.
So it's it's a there this seems wholly
manufactured
for the obvious larger agenda that those of
us were calling out before the last selection,
and we were all called crazy and black
billed. And every second since this started has
been rapidly going.
The United States has pushed some nations facing
tariffs imposed by Donald Trump to approve Elon
Musk's Starlink,
according to the Washington Post, citing state department
cables. The cables, and you could link to
them, the cables show how US embassies and
the department pushed countries
to clear hurdles for satellite companies
often mentioning Starlink by name. Those are the
cables.
The documents do not show that the Trump
administration has demanded favors for Starlink in exchange
for lower tariffs, the newspaper reported, but they
indicate that secretary of state Marco Rubio has
instructed officials to push for regulatory approvals for
Musk's satellite firm. Of course. So go with
this one, and it will be half the
price. Gee. I wonder what they go with.
How do you know this is just being
carefully placed. We're watching them construct this right
in front of us.
Derek's article from January here. This is about
the NSO Group. Oh, I've got them open.
Where he already talks about this as well.
Israeli spyware firm NSO Group found liable for
hacks of WhatsApp users.
He also points out that Meet the Spyware
companies preparing to unleash their tech in Trump's
second term. Spyware.
Not not this that's nefarious. That's secret stuff
on your computer that relays information back to
Israel. That's the NSO Group. That's Pegasus. And
spyware maker NSO Group is paving a path
back into Trump's America. I wonder why. Because
it's an Israeli surveillance tech firm. That's or
rather spyware firm. That's what it is. Of
course, there of course, the Trump administration is
okay with anything Israel connected.
The point,
WikiLeaks on the eighth, today or as, yesterday.
An American jury has ordered Israeli cyber intelligence
firm NSO Group to pay over a hundred
and $67,000,000
in punitive damages.
Why? For the exact article that Derek was
covering. For what's for basically,
it was found to have used WhatsApp to
install its Pegasus software. And so now you
have these exact overlaps being installed throughout this
country or using in use Unit 8200 Israeli
start up companies or the signal,
what's it called? TeleMessage,
the Israeli app we just talked about that
Mike Waltz was using. It's in your face
everywhere. I just wanted to make sure you
saw that this is happening simultaneously
while they consolidate this in the most alarming
way of
everything.
Information,
surveillance, data, phone calls, Internet. And here you
have Israel getting access to all of it
as far as I can tell. Everywhere. Let's
not forget that Israel are are on Twitter,
for example. They're using a unit 8,200
company. Authentics or, I mean, Authentics.
Wait.
What is the name of that? Is that
right? Yeah. It is
yeah. It is authentic.
Why am I blanking on that? Yeah. That's
weird. For some reason, I thought I was
saying the wrong name. It is autentix.
It's spelled weird. It's a u I'll include
this article.
The point is this is a provably connected
Israeli
intelligence entity.
They also use CHEQ to pretend to get
rid of the bots when they really just
flood the platform with bots. All of it
is there for you.
So the point
where were we?
Now, would I close it? Hold on.
Okay. Then well, just make sure I lose
my spot. So
it's obvious to me how immersed this is
with this foreign entity.
And I'm not saying it's necessarily only because
of that. I technically think my personal opinion
is that it's all part of the same
agenda. The same technocratic globalist, Zionist kind of
blob that's rolling all this out. And you
can see it's right in front of you.
And hackable animal also points out, just kind
of summing up what we just showed you,
US pushes nations facing tariffs to prove most
Starlink. Message to the world, join our Technate,
connect to Starlink, or go broke.
Seems pretty clear.
Now a great clip from Carrie met Carrie
Wedler,
just calling out basically the hypocrisy around this.
She says not all maggots, but enough that
it's a problem.
Question Donald Trump and his diehards. I met
with the very rational, very logical argument. Would
you rather have comma? No. I wouldn't rather
have comma. I'd rather have real freedom where
millions of people don't get to impose their
beliefs on millions of other people through the
force of government. But since so many people
have this NPC program running in their brains
now, it's worth considering how MAGA might be
reacting to such a consolidation of private, public,
technocratic, authoritarian power
the expansion of government on numerous fronts that
Kamala, we're doing it. The rapidly encroaching tech
oligarchy and their militarized artificial intelligence and surveillance
ambitions as the regime supports extremely anti Baha
biotech pharmaceuticals
Kamala's a shill for the deep state of
big pharma. Enforcing the nineeleven era real ID
act that further paves the way for biometric
national ID. Ushering in the new world order.
Trump never would have done this. Continuing astronomical
spending, including promising a trillion dollar military budget
and still arming Ukraine. Ruining the economy with
her big spending and war mongering, appointing corporate
lobbyists, filling the swamp as expected, appointing shills
for Israel while silencing speech for them, I
will not stand for the well, it is
for Israel. She's not silencing speech enough, declaring
that only the president and his attorney general
get to decide what laws mean for the
entire executive branch. Communist dictator. BlackRock and financial
mogul Charles Schwab directly benefiting from the administration's
policies. Empowering oligarchs.
Still no Epstein files. Only an agent of
the deep state would do this. Prioritizing making
a central bank digital currency through stablecoins after
fooling people into thinking he banned CBDCs?
Just another lying, conniving politician trying to enslave
and gaslight us? Bombing Yemen and Somalia without
a war declaration. If only the peace president
Donald Trump had won. I understand why people
voted for Trump. Years of being lied to,
coerced, and forced to fund policies you don't
consent to were good reasons to reject the
party in power. But even if Kamala had
one and implemented the same core policies towards
centralizing control and trampling liberties in the name
of equality and tolerance instead of MAGA's freedom
and country, the Trump boot licking solution would
still be, we just need our guy sitting
on the throne. We just haven't elected the
right people yet. Yet. The real problem is
my ideology isn't being imposed through government force.
This is ultimately the same resistance Democrats offer
to Trump. The knee jerk question, would you
rather have comma, is it self reflection of
the indoctrination and enslavement? Accepting two parties and
two slightly different flavors of tyranny is if
they're your only options when you could break
free of the paradigm altogether. You can deem
your rabid subservience to Trump and government at
large pragmatism because you perceive this as better
than the alternative. But it's not pragmatic if
you lose your freedom and your rationalizations for
these encroachments keep the insidious system afloat with
the same technocratic authoritarian militarist trajectory that would
have occurred under Kamala. If you want this
dystopia to end no matter which politician or
party it comes from, it has to be
more than dissenting based on who's in power.
Your skepticism of authority must evolve past partisanship
to the root of the problem, the power
itself. You might wanna stop asking if people
would rather have Kamala and start asking yourself
why you're incapable of questioning tyranny when you
think it's being done in your name.
That is why I love her work, man.
Now just like with me,
you really do have to sort
of either slow it down for some people,
but listen. Slow it down if you need
to and absorb
the points that she's making.
I mean, absorb every single thing that she
it is it's I mean, it's it's logic.
I I I don't even know how you
could disagree with what she's saying. You may
not like the framing, but it's obviously I
mean, it's just important to see that because
I am of the mind
that the vast majority of people, if truly
intro in confronted with it, are of the
same mind. They're just tricked or lied to
or forced or cajoled. Just like with COVID
nineteen, they get driven into choosing one of
the side that are presented for them because
they think that's all that's there. That's exactly
the point she's making.
I know we're out there, guys. I know
you're there. You know? It's just people we
need to start recognizing
whether or not that's the case that it's
behooves you to start screaming what you believe
or just expressing what you believe.
Now, lastly,
Patriot Voice, I believe it was
a a a conservative that was, you know,
somewhat pro Trump until he started to recognize
the problems and good for him for calling
it out. Looks like the whole Maha deal
was just a clever cover for bringing in
the total AI governance governance
into the health care and FDI oversight. Hey,
don't forget this.
I'll
include this as well.
The impending future of AI government, but who
controls the AI?
Just get the sense this is where it's
going and they're not even hiding it. They're
all they're like, I was of the mind
wondering in this, like, whether or not Doge
itself is just like a test run of
an actual AI government.
You know, it's worth considering. That's always how
these things go. You find out later. But
he simply says,
you thought that MAHA would be the end
of mRNA COVID jabs and a return to
truly healthy America? Think again. And he simply
highlights the FDA back, in May 2025. Today,
the FDA announced that on 05/22/2025,
the FDA vaccines and related biological products advisory
committee will meet to publicly
discuss and make recommendations on the selection
of the formula for COVID nineteen vaccines.
He also highlights on the next day, and
a historic first for the agency,
doctor Makary,
today announced an aggressive timeline to scale use
of artificial intelligence internally across all FDA centers.
You get where it's going.
It's all continuing. Every single thing, Maha has
been calling this stuff out, guys.
It's you know, it's obviously,
it is in your interest to be honest
about this stuff.
If which I believe most of you do,
if you actually care about what they promised,
then then by
pulling your punch because you think that side's
better, do you think that will bring closer
to what you want?
I mean, continuing to lean into the lies
will never bring you closer even if they're
both lying, which is the point.
Stand with your principles.
Now is the time and never been a
better time to lean into that because of
how clearly they use those things against you.
Gotta stay right now, we are at an
interesting moment where they're using the lies that
we've been told forever to kind of bring
us into the next phase. I I think
as much as it feels overwhelming, it's also
an important time potentially with more ability to
kind of stifle the growth there, to stop
the transition
in this important overlap. I think that's why
it's become more intense than ever because they
know that.
That if we stick a stick in the
spokes right now, it'll cause more chaos than
it would have before because of this transition.
And I don't mean chaos in the sense
that it will hurt. I mean, for them
and their all encompassing control agenda.
But either way, thank you for at least
considering this information. That's all I ever ask
is for you to consider what we're referencing,
look at the source material,
and just come to a balanced, nonpartisan
objective perspective.
At least let that inform your choices.
So I'll leave you with a clip that
I've I've I've I think this is relevant.
I'll play this on the way out since
I did everything lined up. But thank you
for tuning in.
Please support TLAB. We definitely need your support.
There's plenty of links down below.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Our favorite stories of the future
show the ascent of humanity,
beyond sickness,
beyond conflict,
beyond
the stars,
and even
beyond mortality.
But what if all of our stories of
the future
were wrong?
The assumption
is that we will be there to see
it.
It. Today, we live in disparate perceptual worlds,
where some can clearly see
what others cannot.
The fourth industrial
revolution
giving birth to global technocracy,
elite masters
transcending
geopolitical boundaries,
acting with impunity,
celebrating
our descent
into biodigital
slavery.
Even those who understand where we are right
now may not yet perceive
where we are heading.
So what is the trajectory of humanity?
Right now, we find ourselves
accelerating
exponentially
towards the post human world.
How do we bridge our desperate worlds and
raise the alarm? Press pause and look again
at the world around us on the cusp
of the fourth industrial revolution,
hopelessly addicted to technology.
They tell us that artificial intelligence,
virtual reality, genetic engineering, nanotechnology,
synbio,
are all here for us to exploit,
to set us free from evolution,
and become as gods.
But as we reach into technology,
technology
also
reaches into us.
We have surpassed the Internet of things
and entered the Internet of bodies,
merging humans with machines
run by AI.
Transhumanism
is the transformation of the human species
that continues to evolve with and through technology.
Is
beings will be rendered obsolete.
How far fetched is the post human world?
The enabling technologies exist.
The policies are in place.
Sophisticated
military operations are already underway.
COVID nineteen
was a silo.
The intention was never the disease.
It was always
the injection.
The normalization
of compulsory
injected bio nano enhancement.
Now, the traces of bionano technology
are showing up everywhere in live blood analyses.
Their global technocracy is rising up all around
us and within us, whether we like it
or not.
This
is Omniwar,
and they think they have won.
Every day, they tighten the screws,
surveillance,
censorship,
distraction,
subversion.
We need to be prepared
for the most shocking of
futures. But the story of our future is
not yet written.
In this vital moment, we still have time
to choose.
They have chosen their way to depart this
world,
but we will not comply.
We are the resistance.
Humanity's
response to the fourth industrial revolution.
We will choose our own way, and we
must defend our freedom of choice, whatever the
cost may be.
Resistance means holding on to our humanity.
If you do not change direction, you may
end up where you are heading.
So choose wisely.
What's left of your time
starts
now.