We use it for
violent criminals, our own violent criminals? I call
them homegrown criminals. Yes. I mean, the homegrown
The homegrowns could be The ones that grew
up and something went wrong and they hit
people over the head with a baseball bat.
We have, and push people into subways
just before the train gets there like you
see happening sometimes.
We are looking into it, and we wanna
do it. I I would love to do
that. I'm here in the Leon County Courthouse
where we just got done with the first
appearance of, Juan Carlos Lopez Gomez, who was
detained
Wednesday in Florida,
and he had charges of,
entering
the state, as an unauthorized
immigrant. However, he is an American citizen. His
mother came to the courthouse,
showed his birth certificate and his social security
number card, and that still wasn't enough to
get him released.
The judge just said that she was sorry,
and,
the attorney working for the state, said that
because,
he had an ice hold, he couldn't be
released,
even if the court didn't find probable cause
for his arrest.
This
is
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last twenty four hours.
Friday, April eighteenth twenty twenty five. Thank you
for joining me today.
The story continues.
I mean, it just day by day, this
gets more and more intense and more real
for those that choose to, I guess,
care about how obviously important this story is
regardless of the partisan angles to it. But
some points to start in general, I thought
were interesting that, you know, it's
from what this platform we do on this
platform in general, myself in particular.
As I've said many times over the years,
I will continue to talk about what I
think is most important, and it's never just
one thing. Today, it's pretty centrally focused, but
it's tends to be a lot of things.
We got criticized of over focusing on COVID.
Clearly, that turned out to be obviously correct
to this very day. Still, to this day,
get criticized of over focusing on Israel as
the genocides continue to cascade across the world.
What I find interesting is, you know, I
I I tend to let my gut guide
what I think in that moment is the
most important thing. And I've I've been I've
been miss, you know, wrong or or been
offbeat more than once, like everybody has.
But right now, as I've said before, not
because I thought it was what people expected
or what I thought was gonna become the
story, but in my opinion,
weeks ago, I said this right here, well,
before it became as as real as it
is now, was the most important thing happening
for Americans. I could obviously be wrong. Maybe
you simply disagree with that. But I wanted
to stress this to start,
that I will continue to do what I
think is most important or cover what's most
important.
But that's regardless of whether that's that's what's
even the most popular
even within our independent media circles. And I
think that's important to recognize is that, like,
let's just say this becomes something that literally
everybody disagrees with me on,
including everybody in our audience, I will still
continue to cover what I think is accurate
and what I think is most important, not
because it's vindicated by the support of the
community or in our p the people that
watch the show or because what's more popular,
but because I believe it's right
to a fault. I will air on that
even if it's getting less intention or because
people don't wanna donate anymore. I will still
do what I think is right. And I'm
reason I'm stressing that is because it's important
to recognize that so many so often in
this platform, we have been so far ahead
of something like this that we get negative
attention for even from people in our community.
Until later, it comes back around, and even
half the time that doesn't get recognized because
it was so far ahead. And that's not
really what's happening here. Everyone sees this in
my opinion. Like, the majority of people are
discussing it
for one reason or another. I'm just trying
to really reiterate an important point, which is
that
what this platform is about is not about
trying to find out what is gonna get
us the most attention or the most shares
or even the combination of that with what's
also most important. It's simply alone completely on
its own. What is the most important story
that is the most accurate, that is the
most,
you know, that it is
objective, nonpartisan, and with the most most facts?
That's where where I think we are with
this story in general around just the idea
of the constitutional issue around this. That it's
this is not about whether there's a nuance
to it or the right or the left
or whether the this is clearly right and
wrong. This is about whether or not you
support the constitutional
reality
or not. Just like the free speech story,
of course, there's a hundred people on every
side trying to throw in arguments that get
you to try to you know, that gets
you to stop paying attention to the principle
and start going, oh, well, you know, well,
there's just so many. We can't just do
two process for every but, yeah, you can,
though, because that's the reality. There's no other
conversation. Either you are part of the constitutional
conversation or you believe in the constitutional reality
or you don't
within a state of society. That's where we
are. That is the reality. And so there
are people out there who are desperately trying
to get you to think that we shouldn't
care in this case or for that person
or with this circumstance. And that's,
you know, stupidity,
ignorance,
deceptiveness,
a desire to destroy this country. I mean,
you could pick. But I think it's monumentally
important,
absolutely monumentally important that we continue to highlight
what this is regardless of whether the person
is an illegal alien, regardless of whether the
person is a terrorist, regardless of whether the
person is a completely innocent American citizen who's
being called all of those things. This the
principle is the same. Now also to recognize
what's what David Icke recently pointed out that
I've been saying as well for quite a
while, which is that, oh, it looks like
I'm a lefty again. Funny how thirty seconds
ago, I was the the the Nazi
republican maniac, and now now I'm the lefty
snowflake who's being swayed by all the Democrats
online,
or none of those things. Or I might
my principal stance around the constitution stays the
same, and the maniac partisan narrative swirls around
and convinces different groupings of different size to
see it a different way based on the
narrative of the day. You know, the I
support the the current thing crowd that is
left and right, the woke left and the
woke right, the brogue flakes and the snowflakes
and all of that that overwhelm this conversation
that I'm increasingly seeing as less and less,
if not even remotely close to the majority.
I really do believe that, but I wanted
to make sure I said that to start
today. But we're gonna go over this stuff
again today that I then not redundant information.
New things. A Trump supporter who was attained
by ICE. Not that that should be any
more relevant because he's a Trump supporter, but
interesting to see how this is swinging back
around
like anybody nonpartisan objective would have told you
it always does and will come back to
bite you because you support it.
You know, the reality of just going after
anybody that you don't like even though the
constitution says otherwise because they're just bad or
I was told they're bad or whatever else
the narrative is, but also an American citizen,
who we'll get to in the show. There
there has been a resolution in that regard.
But recognizing that an American citizen with an
American identification
was taken by ICE, and the judge sees
the information and still hands tied, apparently. Now
is that because she's afraid of the purse
the persecution happening around this conversation even though
she knows she has the right to do
something about that, or is that because of
political leaning?
It's hard to say. It's important to get
into. We'll cover that today to talk about.
But we're also gonna discuss
the fifth time that Donald Trump has now
floated the idea that American citizens could be
sent to foreign prisons with no due process.
And, of course, the larger ongoing conversation around
how we have people like Garcia or plenty
of others who are just flat out being
lied about. I'll go over the court documents,
the actual literal documents they all everyone online
seems to wanna point at or highlight screenshots
of, but not really understand.
Realize how blatantly you're being misled about the
Supreme Court nine to zero ruling, either of
them, by the way. Both of them clearly
in the side of what they're doing is
wrong, just a nuance about how it should
be accomplished, not the way they're framing it,
or that Garcia is a terrorist, m s
thirteen,
gang leader, human trafficker, all of which are
patently false, or at the very least,
the only things they claim they're pointing to
have are clearly showed that's not the case,
and there's no other evidence to suggest that.
And if he is those things, there's nothing
to back that up. And the argument is
the evidence we have in front of us
that they're pointing to does not say what
they keep claiming it does.
Now
you might have picked up on the real
I mean, this this is this conversation
not because of the actual principled idea of
the constitutional rights around it or immigration in
general.
I've seen lot lot I see the immigration
conversation largely as a very manipulative wedge issue
that there's still relevance, obviously.
But the it's it's really it's it's frustrating
that we're in a position now where we
have to continue to reiterate these things that
should be fundamental understandings for Americans.
Foundational realities that we don't quibble or waiver
on, that we go absolute,
you know, like,
absolute free speech,
inherent, god given, shall not be infringed
rights.
Not if they say this or if they
wear a red hat or if they were
a January 6 or whatever other you wanna
narrative you wanna spin on top. And it's
important that we truly put aside all of
these partisan games and recognize how clear this
conversation truly is and where this is leading
us as a country.
Now there was one on the point I
just lost, but I wanna I'm gonna go
into it so I don't drag this out
any further, but I wanna get into this
in general today and go through the new
information. The new parts of this that I
think are very, very
but it changes the conversation quite a bit.
And and, of course, the main part that
we titled in regard to a teen that
has been actually sent to El Salvador.
A per a teen that in regard the
ice picked up somebody they were going for,
publicly said out loud, no. That's not the
guy, but take him anyway.
That kid's in El Salvador.
You know, the place where nobody seems to
come back from, even those that are wrongly
sent
like him or Garcia or anybody else we're
talking about. It's a very chilling conversation for
those of us that are speaking out against
a very alarmingly,
I I lawless government
when they're telling you American citizens might be
next, if they are
saying illegal things about Israel,
well, let's hope it doesn't get that far.
Let's hope we have enough constitution, and I
mean that in the sense of, like, gumption
in this country, you know, to to do
the right thing out there listening
or not. Just understanding that you know in
your heart this is wrong, whether or not
the person's got a brown face or whether
or not he is actually part of MS
13. The reality is the same, that due
process applies, and they're violating this. And the
supreme court rules that, and they do it
anyway. We'll go through it again today.
I wanted to start with some important points.
I'm not gonna go into Israel in general
even though let's let's not forget that that
is the reason that they're stating this is
all happening, not my opinion,
not some theory, what they're telling you this
is about. Oh, that well, that's what I
was gonna say before let me pull this
back real quick. I just wanna say that
I know I'm sure, in general, that people
out there just even, like, the time I'm
taking away from this stuff, this this has
gotten to me quite a bit. And I
don't mean the sense that it's like I'm,
like, emotionally losing my cool or anything, but,
like, it's weighing on me more than even
I mean, sadly to say, even more so
than the ongoing genocide. That's not to say
one's more important or more than the other.
In my opinion, the ongoing genocide of human
beings is the absolute most important thing happening
to the planet.
But the point is that this has somehow
gotten to me in a way that is,
you know, momentarily makes you lose faith in
humanity. And I think I have to I'm
I'm always checking myself to go, I you
know, I don't believe that's the real picture.
I don't believe that most people out there
watching these shows or watching I don't think
they actually believe or are of the mind
that they're presenting as the main as the
the majority. I don't believe that. I could
be wrong, but I see more than enough
people out there that that make me see
that even the people they point to don't
really have the opinion they claim they do.
But you fall into it. And day by
day, you see these things, and it's really
it's not just that I think it's not
that I think that everybody falls for this.
I think a lot far too many do.
But it's the problem that you see all
of the government, even the left not doing
anything about it. Nothing to say that they're
better or worse. The point is that at
a point when they're the adversarial side, right,
pow against the power structure as it were,
even though they're all the same thing in
my mind, having the opportunity to go after
him like they tell us they would. Where
are they right now? Yeah. They're saying things.
They're screaming about things of our constitution right,
but they're not really doing anything. Where's congress
impeaching somebody for doing such a radical change
or ignoring Supreme Court rulings? Maybe we'll get
there. I'm gonna talk to them about today
and what that really means for
our republic.
Does that even exist anymore? With a lot
of reasons we're seeing, that's not meant to
be hyperbolic. There's a lot of very obvious
principle legal realities that are showing us that
and then we've been saying it for a
long time, that we don't live in the
place we think we do. And so it's
just it's hard for me to have hope
in the reality that I think things are
getting better, and I know that they are
in a lot of ways, and I think
that's why this is happening. But it's hard
not to lose yourself in that darker before
the dawn kind of reality.
Sure is dark.
Right? And so just I'm just letting you
know that I'm it's not just you out
there. You know? This weighs on me and
it makes me I have a hard time
kind of reconciling how anybody can be like
that, how we can exist in a world
where people are just smugly disregarding,
you know, or acknowledging or rather
proliferating
absolute fabrications that in many cases, I can
prove that they know our lies and are
doing anyway because they hate people that are
brown or because it's all about our agenda
or on the other side because they hate
people in red hats or because you're saying
the wrong pronouns. Same dumb thing in the
same direction.
We just gotta start paying attention to that.
But it does weigh on me because so
many people out there are yelling things that
just make me sick. And even if it's
bots, which I think a lot of it
is,
I guess the long form point is just
saying that it I I understand.
I I'm right there with you, and this
is a difficult situation
in a lot of different ways.
Not what not least of which is because
this stuff is still happening.
And we're and this is even on my
show today, it's consuming the conversation. I do
think it is, from an American perspective, paramount
right now. But this, in case you missed
it, a few points not to overlap or
not to not to miss in all of
it. Muhammad Shahada, on top of the story
we already covered about the Gaza Medics where
they they murdered them. It was proven that
they did so, Israel, and then buried them
to try to cover it up and then
killed the people that tried to come to
find it, and it still came out. The
New York Times still wrote about it. Autopsies
of Gaza of medics killed by Israeli troops
show some were shot in the head.
Like, more has come out about this where
this is a straight up provable, I like,
forensically investigated
execution
of medics. There's no even there's not even
a I mean, they floated the the flimsy
argument that, oh, just they were Hamas. That
was very quickly broken down to be utterly
false even by people in Israel. Half the
people they pointed to, they said were there
were proven not even been there, but that's
what Israel does because they've expected people just
to go along with it. So Mohammed writes,
the autopsies prove that Israel executed the paramedics
with direct gunshots to the head. Even if
you wanna claim their Hamas,
isn't this supposed to be the only democracy
in The Middle East? Are they supposed to
have some kind of pro nope. Not here.
Plus, I mean, that was funny. We don't
even pretend like there's some kind of process
here. Are we to believe that Israel would
come up on a Hamas member surrendering and
they would take them hot take them back
in prison? No. They would murder them, and
that is a crime. See, it's the same
kind of thing we're talking about in the
world today, where you go, well, they're illegal.
That doesn't change the right that they have
rights, and there's laws that in place. In
this case, the same idea would you I
guarantee people in right and probably the left.
If you said they had a position where
they came up on Hamas members and they
surrendered and they murdered them, I bet you
nobody would quibble about that. But despite that
being a massive international war crime because they
were supposed to be POWs.
But do you think our government does then?
No. Our government's the same. They don't care.
I'm just trying to make a simple point
that that matters, guys. It matters whether or
not we care about these things, whether we
express that. Rampant lawlessness is taking over the
world right now.
Murdered these people, burying them in a mass
grave, and then blatantly lying about it knowing
we all see it. Israel shot each of
them multiple times at point blank range according
to autopsies despite wearing clear uniforms and driving
ambulances.
But, yeah, that'll fall by the wayside. Here's
the New York Times article about it.
That's the govern that's the people that they're
helping.
Now this is just to set the tone,
to the table, which a lot of the
opening parts will today.
The number one cause of child deaths
on the planet
right now
is Israel.
Just really take a second to reflect on
how what that means.
Whether you know, I mean, think about, you
know, whatever else we're thinking about is a
terrible try. The number one cause of death
for children is Israel right now.
I just can't even believe that that can
be the reality, and we don't understand that
people would still push back on this. But
we live in a situation where there's some
pretty bad people around, and I'm tend to
think they've taken control of a lot.
Our apathy has allowed that to happen. And
I don't mean that by any kind of
a dislike. I mean, we've been engineered this
way for quite a long time. Our shows
and our fast food and our tour the
chemicals being pumped in our air and our
food and our shots and everything have caused
us to be
diminished,
to very to say it lightly. The point
is we can do something about that. I'm
gonna include an interview with Robert that I
had yesterday that I played today, our architect
for those two days ago, Israel's ongoing genocides
with the plural and the malicious greater Israel
project. It was kinda just getting caught up
with Robert again. He's gonna start to get
back to writing some articles where I'm starting
to get some of that moving again, but
just doing it slowly. So I don't wanna
just get right back into what we're doing
and have more lawsuits fall on top of
me. But bottom line is,
it's a poor and a blue side of
what's going on there.
Very obvious. They're not even hiding what's happening.
Your government is facilitating a massive globalist takeover
of the entire Middle East, but let's keep
listening to Alex Jones that tells you about
chi coms or points to people in Europe
or whatever else they want you to keep
deflecting to as the obvious thing happens obviously
every day.
Speaking of the idiots and partisanship,
I want to point this out how this,
cat turd highlights what we were just discussing,
by the way, which is, I might as
well just grab it since we just did
the show.
The mRNA self amplifying shot.
Fast tracks the shot. Right? This is the
one we just discussed on April 14.
'1 of the few people were talking about
that. I think Shannon Joy was talking about
it as well.
FDA, fast tracks, bird flu, self amplifying mRNA
shot. No one wants to talk about that
in the partisanship, but even Catcher will say,
hell no, and then never talk about it
again. And I simply said, pretty on brand
if you're honest, of course, seeing as how
Stargate rolled out as an mRNA platform, but
no. The thing they're doing again, I'm outraged
about or not really. That's the kind of
feigned
no
and then nothing. Right? So and and evidence
of that oh, that's the one right there.
Evidence of that is three a few days
later, he writes this. Right?
So Stargate platform, mRNA cancer platform.
I mean, a thousand different things they've challenged
directly. M r MMR shots, mRNA platforms. I
mean, whatever else. Fast tracking a new one.
And then on the sixteenth, '2 days later,
we're winning. Be happy.
Of course. Right? Just your your daily your
daily blue pill. Go back to sleep, guys.
We're doing great.
It was insane. And I said, yeah. I
see. I'm fine. I tried I was gonna
do, like, the burning house one, but that's
that's played out. Hashtag winning.
I mean, how are you gonna go from
the absolute opposite of what I want? Hell,
no. But we're winning. I mean, you at
least watered that down a bit. No. It's
because their job is to convince
you that everything's fine. Just go back to
sleep, guys. Get your McDonald's. Listen to the
government. Oh, excuse me. The rebels. I didn't
mean the government. I meant the rebels by
the deep state. Okay? Not the government that's
in control because that would be weird.
And, of course,
they're doing all the important stuff like going
after Tesla terrorists. Like, let's be real about
this, guys. There's there's been about one example
of the re of the one that that's
why they always point to the same one,
which was a big deal. Just because it
was vandalism and and arson,
just you can get prison time for that.
Tesla, showroom, a lot of money.
Oh, that that is something if you think
that doesn't matter, then you're ridiculous in the
same in the same other way. Right? That
matters no matter whether it's Elon's or Tesla's
or whatever else. That's a lot of damage.
Point is, they dealt with that. They caught
somebody. All the rest that I've seen have
been minor stuff, but they're going after these
people like they're, you know, like the terrorist
that your government supports. Almost like that or
I shouldn't say it like that since they
don't actually go after them unless they, well,
taken it back. Because once they use them
like they do them, then they do go
after them like Osama bin Laden,
but getting complicated. The point is this is
what they seem to care about.
Another domestic terrorist who targeted Tesla is off
the streets, targeted Tesla. How does that work?
Did they scratch a car? Did they go
after the the dealership? Did they threaten somebody?
Most of these are pretty benign cases, and
they're facing forty years in prison. You're deporting
you're threatening to deport American citizens. You're giving
people no due process. You're going after people
that scratch Teslas. Where's the Epstein list?
Where's the JFK files? Where's all the people
you claimed you would arrest? Where are any
of the arrests? Where are the tribunals? Where's
Bill Gates? Where's Fauci? Where are all the
people? Everyone on their side is screaming about
that right now, at least but not cat
turd, not the not the huge people at
the top, but the 99%
of the conservative movement behind them. Look online
everywhere
under things like this, under Pam Bonnie's tweet
going, Bonnie, what are you doing? The point
is,
as Solari report writes, no investigations or prosecutions
of the people who stole $21,000,000,000,000
either.
What about that? But her point has been
always they'll never go after that, which shows
you this has always been a lie. Protection
of people who stole our our privacy law
protected data to increase the value of their
private AI companies, you know, like XAI and
Open OpenAI, which they're all doing. It's been
admitted to. Massive privacy issues, but the the
cons constitutionalists
don't seem to care about that. And I'm
only saying to make a point. I am
of the mind that most of them in
the mass of the conservative movement do and
do care, do see it. They're just not
being acknowledged. My point is the ones pretending
to be that at the top don't.
How is this the best investment of our
tax dollars?
By the way, am I crazy or she
look like she's like a
belongs to be like a joker.
She looks like she's like a something about
her face gives me like a joker look,
like, from from Batman. But the point, guys,
is this is not what we should care
about.
Right? I mean I mean, that it's not
unimportant. Yes. Go after criminals, obviously. But funny
how you're not going after all the illegal
aliens that they wanna give a pass to
in all of the hotels and the farming,
but going after people that are in fact
legally in this country who just say the
wrong things. You know, it's all it's a
shell game. It is a bait and switch
at this point. Or things like this that
we're getting, I think, that are and I
think this is designed to get you to
and this is all about just kinda setting
the table for a larger conversation today. There
right now is an effort in the partisanship
to get you looking in a lot of
different directions. My opinion, but decide for yourself.
I thought this was just lazy.
This this person, by the way, just discussed
me for a lot of reasons. But she
says, China just called the American people peasants.
It's time to cancel all Chinese student visas
and ship them back to planes. Okay. Multiple
things happening here in my opinion. One, China's
the one. Everyone look at China, like, Lumer
and all the rest. They're desperately trying to
wave their hands and look over here.
It's China doing everything, and I'm I would
be just as skeptical of China than anybody
else. But show me, what are we talking
about? Give me the actual tangible evidence, not
the partisan narratives versus the actual evidence of
Israel being infiltrated and damn near everything we're
doing every day. And then they praise him.
They high five with it. And they I
mean, it's everywhere in your face, but you're
not supposed to talk about that. You're racist.
Where's that? Anywhere over here. Am I am
I getting thrown in jail for criticize in
China?
That's the first part. Look at China. Second
part is, oh my gosh. It's visas too.
Go after visas. Get them deported. Hey, Palantir.
Yeah. That's part of this. We're gonna get
to you in a second. Track them all
down for us because bad guys, don't worry
about privacy rights. Don't worry about constitutional rights.
We'll get back in the we'll get back
to the good spot in a minute. Just
go to sleep. Trust the plan.
So weird how these seem to converge.
The point is it's not about China at
all, in my opinion. It's about getting you
to look away from Israel and continuing the
deportation
agenda, which is which is entwined with a
lot of things, intertwined with a million different
agendas here.
Whether it's the biometric conversation, whether it's immigration
in general, whether it's the, basically, destruction of
our rights and our constitution.
But here's my point. This was on the
fifteenth.
This is on April 8.
You probably saw this. You probably even know
this, but I just think it's so blatant
what they're doing. Beijing calls Vance ignorant over
his
Chinese peasant's remark.
So you think it's see, people that don't
pay attention to the broader stuff and only
look to people like their gospel their their
ideologues. Right?
Gonna read her post and go, China called
us peasants. We hate China. Report them all
is what you what the dumb people are
gonna say that follow her.
Except the problem is that Vance is the
one that started it by calling them peasants,
and they respond by doing and that this
is right here. If you care about the
back and forth, such a minor point. The
point is that he said that first, they
responded. And so if you're gonna call them
out for calling them peasants, then how about
you make it clear that they that the
US government called Chinese people peasants first? Now
this is all, in my opinion, manufactured to
get you to go China bad. Look at
China. But they are and that people like
this are mindless followers.
You know? But, of course, she has almost
a million followers or over a million followers
now.
Think about that, guys. Isn't that a weird
way to represent the story? Deport them ASAP
because they responded in the same way that
you just called them?
Yes. It's a small point, but think about
how nefarious all of this is, how constant
all of this is, and that's a tiny
point. It's everywhere you look right now. Deliberate
misrepresentation in the partisanship left and right. Here's
an example. Shadow of Ezra says Dan Caldwell,
you might have heard already, a top adviser
to defense chief Pete Hegseth, was escorted out
of the Pentagon
after being named in the Department of Defense
leaks investigation.
So you're hearing a lot about this, about
he's the secret Democrat, and he's the one
that's been undermining everything because he secretly x
y all these narratives and allegations and floated
ideas with nothing to much back it up
from the typical mainstream alternative media types. Caldwell
didn't tow the usual line on foreign policy.
Now I'm not defending good, bad, left, and
it's not about that for me. I question
every person in government or any part can
anybody in power or really anybody.
Completely.
Everything. Question everything. Consider all possibilities is the
only way to live in a world especially
that's trying to deceive you all the time
or just one that exists. But
he openly challenged the Washington consensus on Israel,
saying The US hasn't had the honest conversation
of the topic in over two decades. Okay.
He's also opposed dragging America into war with
Iran, famously stating that he that when Israel
is attacked, it's Israel, not America, under fire.
Right? Tucker Carlson called Caldwell a man of
genuine integrity, high intelligence principle.
Still true. Now whether there's other narratives going
on about what's happening here, you can decide
for yourself. My point is that this is
what's happening in regard to what he said,
what you can prove.
But you get stuff like this. Lumer says,
just in, even though this was well after
it. Right? Breaking. Every something everyone's talked about.
Dan Caldwell, one of the top advisers for
US Defense Secretary Pete Hagexeth, was escorted out
of the Pentagon
after being identified during investigation to leaks. You
recall Dan was listed on the point of
contact. He since locked his account. So this
is you can read more if you want.
This is the cascading, like, narrative about this
guy being the enemy. Right? Why is that?
I'm sure you could piece that together. Laura
is a
flaming Zionist who is actively going after anybody
who tries to undermine the Israel First agenda
of The United States.
So just recognize, another person spoke up and
said, hey. Maybe we shouldn't do whatever Israel
says. You're out of here. Get out of
here. Make it. And then she goes after
him as some kind of insider manipulator
as opposed to somebody who's just leaking in
a way that arguably is the way it's
meant to go, which is look at all
the crimes they're committing,
but not today. Right? There's no whistleblower protection
in this country much as they love to
pretend those things exist. Look at everyone that's
had a real effect. They're all been put
in prison or killed or shot or it's
disappeared.
Now last point on this, I just want
to highlight this.
Redd points something out that I've been calling
out a lot. He said, okay. So questionable
past,
so questionable past Barbie over here, and one
of Elon Musk's pets has 249,000
posts since her account was created. This is
the Insurrection Barbie account. You know, that's pretty
impressive to post every three minutes.
And to an impressive level, 436
posts per day since her account creation on
August 2022. I don't know about you, but
that's some dedication right there. Wink wink.
I've talked about this before, how it works
and the use of automation bots and specific
spam tools for churn every post every second
if you wanted. Barbie's account is nothing more
than a narrative farmer. Now it's an opinion,
but you could do the math for yourself.
And apparently, it gets even worse. As she
points out down here, it was actually, you
know,
basically 429,000
posts over nine hundred ninety days equals an
average of four hundred thirty three four four
34 posts a day. There's one other in
here that was
oh, this right here, the Parzival, which you're
familiar with. Somebody also, he was very pro
Elon in Twitter until suddenly recognized they were
all lying to him. At twelve hours a
day on the platform, it would be around
every 1.5.
Right? So the argument's either that you're talking
about a twenty four hour account,
but that that's obviously not a real person
or a team who's posting that much. Or
if you did the reality and argued maybe
it was a person, that would be twelve
hours a day at most at 1.5 at
every 1.5 minutes. The point is obvious. That's
not a real person. So either this a
real person who just chooses to use a
bot, which is supposed to be against the
rules in this platform, you know, just like
Elon does, by the way. Or
I mean, you you could fill in the
gaps with whatever you think is possible. The
point this guy is, we are this is
either either a blank bot or somebody who
is using bots.
Funny how all the people at the highest
level of this team seem to be doing
the same things.
We're being it's we're being gaslit. Astroturf. That's
what this is. I think it's very obvious.
So the reason I'm including that today is
because look at what's going on. Look at
the false conversation about what we're gonna get
into around Trump sending Americans to foreign prisons
or undermining our constitutional rights. Things that are
supposed to be foundationally important to the team
currently in charge
as a team for a reason. Because the
reality is Americans should understand that there is
no team around all this. But the people
that wanna believe they're on that team, you're
supposed to tell yourselves that constitutional is that
matters more than anything. And now you've been
put to the test.
I think most of you are out there
passing, quite frankly, but I think the problem
is that peep too many are falling for
the screamers like that.
Now one overlapping point before we get into
it in earnest.
Marco Rubio put this out. The American people
don't need an obscure agency to, quote, protect
them from speech by silencing, censoring, or banning
them. Today, we're putting an end to that.
Who are you? Sure doesn't seem that way,
seeing as how you're you just take it
a step further. You're just kicking them out
of the country now. And Twitter doesn't slow
down even remotely. They're censoring things all over
the place for the ADL. It's not a
secret. People just don't wanna talk about it.
He said the state department will no longer
be spending taxpayer dollars to censor Americans. Oh,
they'll just use the black budget money or,
you know, whatever else. This is just narrative,
guys. Let's realize how embarrassing it is for
somebody who is leading a a censorship campaign
on Americans for antisemitism, acting like they're even
remotely trying to change. All they're doing is
shifting gears, direction into something different.
We're going away from the woke agenda and
into the Israel antisemitism. It's the same thing.
The outcome is the same.
If you're paying attention, of course, Ben Shapiro
host this complete war criminal maniac because he's
a complete shield for the government. APAC tracker
says b as detected. Rubio supports APAC's efforts
to censor free speech. There's no question about
that.
Here, green Glenn Greenwald responds to that same
post and says, how do these people have
the audacity to masquerade as free speech champions
when they've spent the three months devoting massive
resources to deporting people
legally?
That's so important.
Legally in The United States for the crime
of criticizing Israel, then forcing colleges to expand
the hate speech codes to protect Israel.
Khalil
and 10 plus others that we can prove
that went to El Salvador were here legally.
It does include people who went through the
legal process seeking asylum or seeking even real
citizenship.
And in the midst of that process, we're
snatched and sent to El Salvador. No criminal
record here legally or in the process of
seeking such,
and they have a wrong tattoo. That's literally
and they've admitted this. That's literally all we're
talking about. In some cases, we can prove.
I'm gonna go over specifics that New York
Times is able to get a hold of,
showing you that the vast, vast, vast majority
of these people are innocent.
Some of them might have been here legally.
The ones we can prove, I can prove
to you that many of them were here
legally. That should be enough for anybody who
cares about the constitution.
And here's a a a little meme that
was put out by Patrick. I think it's
perfect. Little Marco in the temple of AIPAC.
It shows him stretched like Indiana Jones, which
in a part of me hates because he
doesn't deserve that. But woke right censorship in
one hand and woke left censorship on the
other, and he's carefully putting one in place
the other. Right? That's that's that's what's happening
right now. And Patrick says the woke right
is real, and it's even more insidious than
the woke left because it's using US state
power to crush dissent against the policies and
actions of a foreign government, Israel. The sad
thing is is people that just are can't
think past their own personal opinion
hear that. They go, there's no woke. Right?
Because all they think is woke, you know,
pronouns and and
rainbow flags. That's all they can think because
that's how simple their mind is about this.
It's about what is accomplished
through those tactics. Right? So if it's censorship,
I, identity politics,
right, cancel culture, it's all the same stuff
for a different narrative. Fill in the blank
with antisemitism,
Israel, Zionism. It's exactly the same thing. Or
plenty of others, in some cases, even the
same exact things. There's nobody nobody wants to
call it out.
Now one other point that overlaps with Palantir,
which I think you need to see before
we get into the rest of the conversation
about the constitutional crisis in this country. And
what's what's sad about that, by the way,
is just even using that term. So much
of this conversation has been so wildly
you know, because Democrats and this is so
simple. It is like the most lazy example
of basic reverse psychology. So we come out
and we go and whether anybody's even talked
about it. This is unconstitutional
because here's the
I wanna I'm so frustrated about this. The
effing constitute is right there. Okay? Here's what's
happening. Here's the law. How are we confused
about this? Then you get a democrat that
comes out, an opportunist, I would argue, who
just sees how obvious it is and goes,
wait. I can win some points and goes,
that's that thing. And they go, see. Ryan
just said what the Democrat said.
Okay.
In fact, I was saying this weeks ago
before any of them said this. The point
is, how does that make a difference? Just
because a Democrat says it, therefore, it's false?
You can't be that stupid. You can't be
that simple in this conversation.
Consider it. Maybe it's wrong because it's wrong.
If that's the case, then prove that. It's
not wrong because the New York Times covered
it or because Van Holland went to go
see the guy. I called this out before
he even went. I said he's probably an
opportunist.
So I just wanna set that out there.
It's insane to me that we're in this
conversation where they just go, well, you were
just listening to Democrats online. Did you even
look, or are you just listening to Republicans
online? It's the same stupid conversation.
I'm doing neither of those things. I'm looking
for source material as you should do. That's
the only way you can do this.
Now here are a couple important points to
how this is going.
Overlapping with Israel, which I don't even know
how you can miss today. But Vannie Johnson
and this does kind of overlap with the
first part. Right? The
America
First, partisan lie.
He says breaking. And if is it NVIDIA,
I think, or NVIDA? Whatever I I think
I'm just gonna say NVIDIA,
which is the the supercomputer
chip manufacturer,
is to manufacture
American made AI supercomputers in The United States
for the first time.
America First, he says. Well,
is it?
It's very easy to just fall into the
trap of just going, whatever Betty says is
gotta be the truth even though he doesn't
seem to be very bright in my opinion.
The point is,
Nvidia has a pretty strong Israel connection, but
that's not that's not enough to go that's
doesn't count. It doesn't matter.
As he'd say, significant connection to Israel. But
here's what matters to me.
Nvidia is developing and building Israel One, One
of the world's most powerful generative
AI cloud supercomputers.
Nvidia has invested in the Israeli startup ecosystem.
Oh, you mean, like, the that's the unit
8,200
Israeli intelligence
infiltration vehicle
that they've proudly discussed and have written articles
about? Yes. Okay. So they've been there just
like SoftBank, by the way, that also runs
the Stargate program,
they've basically financed
the Israeli
intelligence infiltration startup,
vehicle.
If that is what that's the the startup,
conversation we have more than once where they
put agents or people that are, quote, ex
agents to go out and create companies that
they then run for the interest of Israeli
intelligence. That's not my opinion. They've written articles
about saying that's what they're doing.
So if you have now another entity from
the AI side of this who's also in
that boat, we have to start paying attention
to these overlaps. And it says the company's
commitment to Israel is evident in its ongoing
investments and support for its employees, including those
in Gaza and the West Bank. So not
only that, it's a company that is, as
of right now, still investing in what they're
doing in Gaza and the West Bank. You
know, the ongoing genocide. If you want a
company to boycott, it'd be something like
that. And Zachary Foster also points out, if
you work for NVIDIA, your employer will actually
not, despite them claiming to match donations to
basically anything like a lot of companies do,
turns out they wrote down except for these
ones. Right? Will not match your donations to
people like the victims of Israel and the
starvation of Gaza.
However, if you work for Nvidia, they'll actually
match your donation to the illegal settlement movement
in Israel.
So it just shows you what and that
that none of that is proof that they're
somehow not on your side or America First.
The one that matters to me is that
you have a company that's strongly invested in
what is the infiltration,
that is The U the Israeli start up
unit eighty two hundred intelligence vehicle,
and their Israel
One supercomputer.
Now are we wondering at all whether that
is what this will be, that they're simply
now working on this massive supercomputer program? Why
would they start a new one for The
United States when they're working together? And SoftBank
is the financial side leading the entire thing.
You must be smarter than this. But, of
course, he says America First.
Everything else is Democrat, I guess. Right? You
you must listen to CNN or whatever the
excuse would be to make you ignore the
obvious real time thing that's happening in front
of you.
But people like Benny are too caught up
in winning, apparently, whatever that looks like to
you.
Now here's another example. Mint Press News. New
investigation.
Google's thirty two billion dollar purchase of Wiz
hands its global data security
to an Israeli firm
founded and staffed by ex military cyber spies
from,
surprise, surprise,
IDF's unit eighty two hundred.
So either we're watching a massive kind of,
like, a, like, power grab by the group
that I think has always been infiltrating all
of this stuff? Or I mean, I just
don't know how else you frame this. At
rapid scale, we are watching these things kind
of get consolidated in the hands of one
clear power structure.
Now I'll this is going to overlap with
the deportations. First, I just want you to
see that that I'll include the articles we've
done, excuse me, the shows we've done, Israel
Global Cybersecurity Infiltration.
We do a real focus on this exact
thing about the infiltration specifically of cybersecurity.
The one we talk about, the same overlap
but more in-depth, but in light of the
pager attack that happened in Lebanon, really thinking
about what that means, that you can have
pagers that five to ten years are circling
your country, they just decide to execute, explode,
and you've never even knew they were there.
I'm willing to bet you got somewhere like
the Samson option overlap, probably everywhere in the
world. I don't know why they wouldn't done
that based on what they say everywhere else,
but you can look at it for yourself.
Or the article that Whitney wrote for TLAB
back in 2023, the prince and the spy,
overlapping Eric Prince with an Israeli spy and
the conversation about how they use him to
get to kind of work their way into
The US market, or the fact that as
they've written down in their own articles, as
I said before
I think I just passed it.
Yes. It says, since 02/2012, cyber related and
intelligence projects that were previously carried out in
house in the Israeli military and Israel's main
intelligence arms are transferred to companies that in
some cases were built for that exact purpose.
That's pretty specific. In some cases, managers
of development projects in Israeli military and intelligence,
like unit a two hundred specifically, were encouraged
to form their own companies, which then took
over the military project.
I mean, there's really no way to misunderstand
that, guys. This is an intelligence operation. They're
building companies in your government. What if it
was China doing that? Or your your country,
I meant. If China was building companies throughout
the oh, looks like even the the idea
of land ownership is too much, which I
agree with. China shouldn't be owning not Chinese
entities, by the way. That's a different conversation,
legally speaking, but Chinese government owning land in
this country should that shouldn't be okay. So
why do we allow Israel's intelligence apparatus to
build companies working for their they're spying. They're
they're harvesting data. Now it's just becoming the
government.
You might wanna think about what that means.
Now today
oh, one more thing, actually. Express News overlaps
this with Israel deploys AI chatbot. So as
we're watching this, like, AI
consolidation around the world and with Israel's fingers
owing every buy that seems to be doing
it,
they given they they've adapted on top of
the Palantir,
Lavender,
Habsora
execution,
assassination factory, they called it, from nine seven
two magazine. They now have given them what
are called AI chatbots or called Genie to
the army on the ground. They've expanded their
AI murdering system and launched what's called Genie,
a battlefield chatbot used by commanders to make
real time decisions,
which we already got we I already I'll
include these so you can read them for
yourself if you haven't gone over them. They
in these articles, what they tell you point
blank from the IDF members
on the record, as this is even called,
a mass assassination factory, where they tell you
they're being pushed to basically take what the
AI says at face value without any investigation,
and they're just mass murdering people. I'm willing
to argue this is a way for them
to kind of pretend like nobody made these
choices and it was always AI's fault if
it ever came to that.
There's plenty of this evidence.
So now they're just continuing in that direction.
This is not and this is with Palantir,
and this one's using chat GPT or modeled
on chat GPT
integrated with their military networks.
It's already active in all command centers.
Their deployment builds on platforms like Habsura, and
I'll grab that one too for you.
That was the first one. Oh, that was
the one I just showed you, actually. That's
this one here. The mass assassination factory, Lavender.
One's basically for buildings, one's for people, and
both of them are doing the same thing.
So continuing the thing, continuing the agenda. Here
is Palantir,
January twelfth, showing you
we're partnering with a genocidal entity. There's carp,
there's teal,
Right there. Happy to partner with Israel while
they're committing a genocide.
That's important. Now I'll include this for you
to watch if you wanna watch it again
as Teal, like, in the most painful way,
stumbles through not answering a question that's basically
about why you're letting them kill people with
AI.
And his ar his argument is I defer
to Israel because they the I Israel you
know, I I'm not gonna question their decisions.
I defer to Israel. That's what this massive,
powerful, elitist oligarch said.
Pay attention. It's so obvious what's happening.
And, of course, weaponized migration and experimentation, we
covered this on 08/2024,
tools for subversion division and manufacturing consent. That's
where we are.
So if you wanna see one obvious overlap
now you could argue this is sort of
take it you know, never let a good
crisis go to waste, but that never is
you that is wasn't always by itself.
Half the time, if not more, they manufacture
the thing they then take advantage of. Right?
So in this case, which we've already been
telling you was coming, we've already been talking
about this, we then they caught an Israeli
entity, an agent, a Mossad agent, or rather
somebody working for Mossad outside the border, and
everyone dropped that story. We talked about that
many times. This has been building.
In this case,
what is this for?
Well, we know about the biometric wall. We
know about the great reset overlap. We know
about the surveillance discussion. We know about the
migration overlap, like, immigration in this country.
K? So this has been built and driven,
obviously, for larger agendas in the world, in
my opinion, but also for now what they're
using it for to execute in this country,
which is Palantir.
Their plan to help ICE deport people.
Now, yes, the deportation aspect is clear for
some agendas, but it's a means to an
end to get us in the technocratic control
structure to accept like they did after the
Patriot Act conversation or after 09:11 to accept
the new scenario,
the new security state. Now we're going into
the technocratic security state or the overlap with
the biosecurity state. All of this is building
rationalized on the idea that we have to
get rid of this.
We told you this was coming. This is
one of the things that we were all
pointing to, that they would use Palantir to
ultimately achieve this end using the facial recognition,
biometric scans. That's we told you this is
how this would go when they said mass
deportations for the first time. Here we are.
Amazing how many times you can be so
far ahead of these kind of things and,
you know, not like we knew for sure
just because that's what logically made sense to
us.
And how many times you could make those
kind of claims and how many times nothing
seems to shift in the conversation of average
people. JD Vance says this.
Consider that Joe Biden allowed approximately 20,000,000 illegal
aliens into our country.
Now this is a a a claim that
is disputed.
I think that's important
because, I mean, I the the argument is
that ultimately that seems like a ridiculously high
number, but let's just take it at face
value for the conversation. Because to me, it's
it's an irrelevant point to what the what
he's trying to use it for.
So his claim is 20,000,000 people.
I mean, as always,
you should absolutely demand that we verify things
like this. They say they float things like
this out and it becomes the talking point.
You'll find Fox and OAN and everybody else
just blindly stating these things without any verification
because they know they can get away with
it.
But
let's again, I for all we know it
is, I wouldn't surprise me because this has
been manufactured, but it does seem ridiculous to
me. This placed extraordinary burdens on our country.
Our schools, hospitals, housing. I mean, nobody should
dispute that. The the the manufactured immigration crisis
from left and right is clearly causing things
that we should care about.
And essential services were overwhelmed on top of
that. Many of these illegal aliens committed violent
crimes and facilitated fentanyl, sex trafficking. Okay. You
know, there are big broad scooping claims there,
none of which he's actually verifying, but to
some level, there is these things happening. There's
also just as many of those things happening
by American citizens.
But it says the American people elected the
Trump administration to solve this problem. Of course,
that's the game we play. Right? Even though
I think we can prove quite frankly that
your vote never translates to the outcome. And
I'm sure but the point is the same.
Plenty of Americans did want him in power.
So, again, we'll accept that for sake of
argument, for sake of conversation. That is the
reality. That's what happened. The president has successfully
stopped the inflow of illegal aliens, and now
we must deport the people who came here
illegally. Okay. Even though what we've already shown
you is an endless amount of examples of
people that were here legally and had the
wrong ideas, people who were deported without due
process, that even if they were here illegally,
they have the right to go through that
process.
Anybody.
You know, and, you know, what kills me
is that I know right now that's still
one of the most debated topics despite how
being despite being the easiest to prove.
When you have people like judge Nepal judge
Nap, Napolitano, or or,
what's was the one I was just thinking
of? Oh, you know, just Scalia general as
a justice who ruled in Reno versus Flores,
which is literally cited in the Supreme Court
case, which I'll show you in a minute.
All I'm telling you because it's not even
hard to understand. It is basic. It is
a fundamental thing, and yet we're still debating
with idiots online about whether illegal aliens have
the right to due process. They do. Yes.
Move beyond it and start the reason is
that's the only thing they have to try
to make sense of where we are.
Honestly, I don't even think honest people are
making these arguments. I think it's bots or
people that are invested in a certain team
sport political agenda or something that doesn't care
about the outcome of this country at all.
The point though,
we know that's not the full picture, but
that's what people who wanna go on this
and listen to Rubio alone and Trump are
pretending is the case. All the legal alien
and terrorists. It's not true.
In fact, I don't have evidence of any
of them being even remotely terrorists.
We'll get into that whether they can just
arbitrarily label that. But going forward, it says,
to say the administration
must observe due process is to beg the
question.
What process is due?
It it what process is due is a
function of our resources.
The public interest, the status of the accused,
the the proposed punishment, and so many other
factors.
Okay?
To put it in concrete terms, imposing the
death penalty on an American citizen requires more
legal process than deporting a legal okay. What
what's your point? So it's a burden. It's
too much. It's hard.
Okay. So the argument so this is the
same way we do this with the other
conversation.
In principle is all that matters. So his
argument is when this becomes too difficult, we
can ignore your rights.
Right? When is there is there some clause
in the constitution that says when there's too
many cases, we can ignore due process? No.
So let's stop being children about this. I
don't care how difficult it is for you,
and I'll make more cases for, more points
about this to what some Ryan Grim had
a good point about it, I'll point out.
But we this is where it's like to
side with principle, guys. Look. I'm not saying
there's not a logical argument to be made
about how that would be a problem. But
even if that's the case, even if it's
impossible,
are you able to stand back and go,
maybe they drove this into reality for this
very purpose so that we would go, yes,
suspend our rights like they did in El
Salvador
and never get them back like they've done
in plenty of places where The US supports?
We just can't be this simple. We can't
keep falling in these same excuses or let
the people screaming in partisanship
drive you into this.
Especially, have we even proven that 20,000,000 are
actually what's there? Like, let's this is why
these things matter. But even if it's a
hundred million, it doesn't change the reality of
the legal circumstance that they are required to
do this. Now look. If it was as
simple as they claim it was, this would
be a basic reality. They had people step
up. They'd say, here's the evidence. We can
prove it. Move on.
The reason they know this will be a
quagmire is because they don't have evidence for
any of them,
Or at the very least, very little, which
they've basically admitted to.
It says when the media and the far
left see, that's that's just the only way
they frame this. And this is how they
get people who might be on the fence
to be, oh, I don't wanna be the
far left. Oh, I I'm not like the
media. So I guess I'm guessing on Rubio
side.
Simple people fall for stuff like that, but
there's a lot of them out there. The
reality is this is not about left and
right. It's about what the constitution states and
whether your government is ignoring that.
To say it's only far left or only
left Democrats or anyone that has the opinion
this is a problem, it should be either
wrong, lying, or swayed by Democrats is a
lazy argument that's made to make you ignore
the facts in front of you.
Consider what they're saying like everybody else, but
look Look for yourself. I shouldn't be I
mean, the crazy thing is we shouldn't have
to stress that to people.
But it says the media and the left
obsess over a MS thirteen gang member. Nope.
And demand that he be returned to The
United States for a third deportation hearing. Nope.
They're really saying that he's been the vast
that they're really saying
what they're really saying is they want the
vast majority of illegal aliens to stay here
permanently. That's not even remotely what people are
saying.
Some people are saying that, sure, because they're
ridiculous.
The idea that we should say let legal
that's like the right in the same way
in the in the opposite direction.
Right? There's plenty of people on the left,
and I think it's designed this way, saying
that we shouldn't care. Let illegals vote. They
should be
if that's the case, then go through some
process to argue that in regard to the
the, you know, legislation.
The point is right now, the law is
the way it is, and that's to argue
that it shouldn't matter is just as dumb
as the right saying that narrative, therefore, we
don't have to care about the right on
this side or the law or process.
All both of them are trying to get
you to ignore the thing in the middle
for whatever narrative they're saying on the side.
And the thing in the middle is what
we all have to care about, the constitutional
law, the reality of this driving and not
I mean, think about how clear that is.
Both sides want you to ignore the law
for their narrative.
How can we miss that?
So what they're really saying is they want
the vast majority of illegal aims. Where where
do you get vast majority and then permanently?
Where do those even those arguments even come
from what you just said? If if we're
let's just say we're obsessing over MS thirteen
members
and have giving them a third trial. How
does that then immediately translate to the vast
majority legally and state permanently? He's trying to
scare you. He's trying to shock you into
thinking you either agree with me or you
want that dumb narrative right there. And I
don't see anybody actually saying that outside of,
again, the left and right cartoons.
Here's a oh, and then to go back
again. We'll go over this extensively again.
The evidence they're using is nonexistent.
Over and over, they keep citing the same
things and they don't there's I'll go I'll
give you the evidence we have. I'll give
you the court documents, and I'll give you
what they're pointing to as I've, by the
way, already did well before this became a
big hot topic, which is my point from
before. We went over the court rule, the
documents, and everything else showing you what they
had about get of MS about, about Garcia,
their accusing of MS thirteen right when they
started.
Because they made the claim, Melnick had those
documents, and he said, look. They're lying about
it. Here we are. And now we have
to go through it for the third time
because people are only just discovering this topic.
That's what I'm here for. But I just
wanna show you how frustrating it is that
we have to keep going through these documents
and have people online scream that, no. He's
a terrorist and a gang member and a
human trafficker, and he raped grandmothers or whatever
Trump said that day and just becomes the
narrative.
And
he says, here's a useful test. Ask the
people weeping
over the lack of due process. Can you
even imagine? Like, where is everybody?
Like, that's like saying weeping over free speech.
Like, it doesn't matter what the narrative is
around that. It's the same thing used to.
That is something that's a fundamental
inherent right.
So all he's saying is ask the people
weeping over your constitutional rights what precisely they
proposed for dealing with Biden's millions of illegal
well, I think we already established that, bud.
Due process.
Or is your argument that you're just too
tired? It's gonna take too long. You know,
your constitutional rights are too much of a
burden for the government. Yeah. You're goddamn right
they are.
That's the point.
And this is and with reasonable resource and
administrative judge constraints, does the solution allow us
to deport at least a few million
he's trying to overwhelm what you think is
possible. How about you just start by going
along the right path? Start by proving what
you're saying, and we can go from there.
The argument that you just lay out this
grandiose idea that suddenly this is just too
difficult, therefore,
suspend your rights?
I mean, again, in principle, there's no difference
here. If they're I mean, as they're literally
suggesting that Americans can go and we're gonna
act like they don't have to prove what
they're claiming,
I just I I can't believe that most
people can be this stupid or this easily
deceived. I just can't believe it.
And it says, if the answer is no,
they'll give they've given their game away. They
don't want border security. See? And if these
false pair these false binaries, somehow, by arguing
you want due process or people the government's
accusing of a crime, you don't want border
security because either you get it all or
you get nothing.
You're either with us or you're against us.
That's how they play this game. It's false
binary, left and right. You either want all
of them in here or you want to
you know, it's it's always something that they
they play on what they know you want
or what they know you hate based on
what they've engineered you to feel.
They don't want us to deport the people
who've come into our country illegally. See, here's
who is he talking about?
Talking about the idiots in congress? That's not
who any that's not the conversation. It's about
the American people and what they want. See,
what they do in the left right binary
is frame them, each other as the conversation
when they're both cartoons.
Most people in the country are pretty much
somewhere in the middle. People who want due
process do not want you to let everyone
come in illegally. That's nowhere in the conversation.
I don't I mean, you show me one
person that's saying just let everybody in no
matter what. I don't even see that in
congress for crying out loud even though some
of them will probably make that argument.
They want to accomplish through fake legal process
what they failed to accomplish politically.
Ah, and there is it comes down. Oh,
because they want to do this because they
wanna never have to run for election again.
Oh, you mean like what Bukele did in
El Salvador? He just turned it into a
one party state, what you guys support, what
Israel's trying to do, and what you seem
to be driving into reality? The point is
it's just one government using your hatred for
each other, guys.
It's depressing.
Now Zaid says, JD, if someone really if
someone's a really bad hombre, you can give
them a trial and prove it.
Saying you don't have to prove it means
you're okay with deporting innocent people.
That's the truth. We've already seen that. It's
already happened, guys. They've already admitted to having
an error. Now that's whether you make it
just about where he went or not, it's
the same point. There's clearly more than that
as we'll go through yet again today. But
even the one they wanna admit to and
now they're walking that back and acting like
there was no mistake even though they all
already said that,
which is that he wasn't allowed to be
removed from this country because there was already
a stand an order from the supreme court
or a judge saying he cannot be sent
to El Salvador. And why?
Political
persecution. They're all trying to make it out
to be some gang attacking him. Are you
are we pretending like this that anybody would
say you we're gonna protect you because you're
a gang violence, the gangs that you fought?
It's on the record. I've already wrote read
read it on the show more than once.
Political persecution
is the government. You You know, the same
government out there screaming they want the people
back. God knows what they're doing with people
that are their dissidents over there, which is
exactly why Bukele or, Bukele
did what he did, suspend civil liberties, removed
all the judges, one party state,
remove it changes the reality so we can
run for a second time even though it
was against the law at the time, sort
of like what we're gonna see in this
country soon.
The bottom line is it's about the individual
reality, guys. You either you you either deal
with it or you don't.
To let him give this excuse is one
small it's a nail in the coffin.
I mean, really, the way this seems to
be going, it might well be the last
one.
Now JD Vance says oh, and then he
goes on and says, treating people like throwaways
is no different than the elites in this
country did to your family over generations. You're
giving them far too much benefit of the
doubt.
He says again, you're not even addressing the
issue. Oh, I'm pretty sure he's addressing the
only issue. You're you want people to jump
at the shadows.
Biden overwhelmed the system, so all he wants
you to do is go to the thing
he says is the problem. Well, the problem
doesn't change the fundamental legal reality.
So here's where this becomes important. Here's what
oh, wait.
Ryan Grim said.
And this is what fans put forward. Here's
the useful test. Ask the people weeping over
the lack of due process what precisely they
propose for dealing with Biden's millions. Like like
you're supposed to give him the direction to
go in. The the the reality, the law
is already there. Right? So Grim says, is
this a joke?
You control congress,
which they do, the Republican Party and the
White House.
If the laws are insufficient to your task,
pass new laws consistent with our constitution. I'm
glad he wrote that. That's our system, guys.
That's how this works.
You don't just ignore the laws because you're
frustrated or because it seems too busy or
because it'll take too long. That's not a
that's a childish argument. That's not a real
argument.
Even if it's the reality, guys, that's we
have to be this smart. So the problem
is he's trying to put it on you.
You got any smarter ideas? Well, pass a
law then. Like, if it's and that's the
point about Mayberry versus Madison. If it's repugnant
to the constitution, it's null and void. But
you could pass laws that would change that
reality
that are not that are not repugnant to
the constitution.
There's plenty of ways I could see that
happening, but they don't want to do that
because this is not about a legal reality,
guys. It's about enshrining the lack of a
legal reality. It's about enshrining the the lawless
nature of whatever they just say whatever they
say is what stands. That's where they are
right now.
And, Glenn,
at a few facts,
regardless of what side the due process deportation
debate that you're on raised by Vance.
He says, one,
the only reason a Gregor Garcia case is
a controversy is an immigration court blocked
his deportation,
and Trump administration
admitted he was mistakenly picked up by ICE.
That's very important. Now we're gonna get to
the case again with a kid who is
now already in El Salvador, a teen.
I should say kid. I said I think
he's 18, so technically an adult, but a
teen sent to El Salvador already even though
they admitted he was not even who they
were going for.
Talk about no due process. I mean, that's
insane.
Number two, the Supreme Court ruled nine to
zero,
six conservative judges, by the way, The US
must facilitate his return. No. This is what
they're they're I mean, there's so many Trump
supporters screaming online that they won this case.
It just shows you how easy it is
to use that base to screen your narrative
and sometimes
get momentum.
They're flat out lying about that. Or even
more alarming, the Stephen Millers of the world
don't even know they're wrong, which wouldn't surprise
me,
but that's pretty insane.
Number three, ordinary deportation, sending someone back to
the court country of their origin
are very quick and easy.
It's done by a deportation court inside the
DOJ. But see, that that talk about see,
that's even different than what Rubio is saying.
If they really had this much evidence, it
would be actually pretty facilitated. It would be
quickly facilitated.
They don't want that because they don't have
evidence. They're picking people up as we've already
proven and we're proving more today with the
wrong place, the wrong time, skin color, and
in some cases, not even that alone, to
be honest, not even tattoos like this kid
we'll talk about next. But then the wrong
tattoo, a Michael Jordan tattoo, or even a
Bulls hat is enough.
Even though the 23 is what actually matters
and there's no 23 for every Bulls gear,
but they make the exception. Well, he's a
Bulls fan, so he must be part of
the gang. I'm not even making that up.
That's radically different than sending people to life
in prison and the third country where they
have nothing to do with, which has been
many of them.
No legal reality. There's no legal precedent, no
law in place to make this happen for
anybody, guys. Based on allegations of criminality that
are never proven. Due process is raised only
with that. The point that the second thing
I just said there, though, that's the problem
is that you have people that really want
Trump's in. He's the president, so he can
do whatever he wants to is the kind
of mindset. That's what they're driving through these,
hopefully, bots online.
The idea that you want a king, you
want a dictator as long as he's your
dictator, it kinda seems like a lot of
people feel that way right now.
Then we have to do that to fight
the evil Democrats, and that's how you've been
played.
You're you're asking for your own subjugation
or rather your own diminishment of your rights.
Supreme court also just ruled, and I'm gonna
go over both these today again, nine to
zero, that anyone Trump even wants to remove
under the enemy's aliens I don't know why
I keep saying that wrong. An alien enemies
act
first gets a habeas hearing, so due process.
And you have to prove they're a gang
member. That is what they ruled. And all
they did is say, okay. Fine. They were
gonna do it without the alien act. Well,
hey. Well, that means you could've done it
the whole time like that, like we said.
But they still require due process. Imagine saying
they ruled that we have to give the
due process, so now we're gonna do it
without that act
and pretending like you don't already know that
you have due process rights for everybody. That's
why they went with the act because they
knew that the act in place would give
them some kind of leeway to overview, just
kind of jump over due process. So they
go away from that, and they've sent more
people without due process.
It's insane how obvious all this is. This
is a very dangerous moment for this country.
Trump appointed judge in Texas then,
based on the Supreme Court ruling, ordered
the,
the deportations of Venezuelans to El Salvador to
cease pending a hearing. They sent them anyway.
That's what's happening.
These aren't left wing judges like they keep
trying to scream. That's what the narrative becomes.
It's not.
It's also right wing judges that are there,
like, six in the Supreme
Court. It says the ones most popular among
the right, in fact, upholding the bill of
rights, which has applied to everyone in The
United States, not just citizens, for at least
a hundred and fifty years.
This is why I think people like Glenn
you know, I'm really I'm really wanna give
a shout to Glenn in general for you
know, I mean, it's clear that he's willing
to call either side based on principle. I
think that's what we have to be right
now. The point is not just citizens.
Everybody.
He also adds or this person responds saying,
we don't have time for all that.
This is what you're gonna get online. The
American people don't support due process for each
and every illegal alien that after they were
allowed to enter by the millions, he's just
repeating what JD Vance wants you to think.
It's not going to work that way, Glenn.
Glenn says, I realize that some Americans want
Trump to ignore and even violate orders of
the Supreme Court and to basically act like
a king with no powers on his constraint.
As I said, I was simply pointing out
facts about what Trump appointed and other right
wing judges have ruled. I mean, that's the
point. I get it. You wanna be able
to just do whatever you want, but then
you'll cry foul when the republic democrats do
it to you later or maybe even the
republicans down the line.
The point
though, whether that's a bot or not,
we don't have time for that is what
JD Vance was pushing. That that's the narrative
that's now circulating.
And, of course, the American people did no.
You don't speak for the American people. I'm
of the mind that most people are smart
enough to recognize what this is.
Do support due process for everybody, whether illegal
or not. But also realize, guys, the two
points is many of the ones we've already
pointed to are not illegal aliens. But here,
the gate the same point is made. If
you because the point is, if we're not
allow if due process is not given to
these people, you don't know what they are.
You're letting the government
tell you what that person was who's now
rotting in a prison you'll never hear from
again. Do you realize not a single person
who's been sent to El Salvador over the
last week plus has even been allowed to
call anybody? No one's even been out I
mean, other than the Abrego, the Garcia point
we're gonna show you because there was pressure,
they're not allowed to they can't even call
their family members. So you're telling me you're
you're okay with the government, left or right,
being able to go, you go just El
Salvador. No process, no verification because they claim
he's an illegal alien.
Don't you wanna know that they are? What
if it's not? What if it's an American
citizen? What if it's a political dissident?
The fact that you can't wrap your mind
around that out there for those that might
not be able to is wild to me.
I believe most of you can
because you don't know they're illegal until you
have due process. That's evidenced by the fact
that, yeah, we now have people that are
being proven to actually have been here legally
with no criminal record who are in El
Salvador, and we know that. And yet people
like this still push back.
Could be boss.
Now the Palantir Palantir overlap,
Paul Paul says they're all very excited about
this new mass arrest and deportations without due
process thing. They are. So here with JD
Vance was all pushing the 20,000,000 illegal alien
idea.
Joe Lonsdale from Palantir said, well said. A
couple friends texted me today about the due
process and ruling of law issues around USA
immigration
situation. And I shared GD's post with my
reply. Context is critical for this one. You
guys are absolute clowns.
So all you're really saying is as long
as we have an excuse, your rights don't
matter. That's exactly what the elitist would want
you to think. Like the Andreesans and the
Carps and the Tills who tell you, you
need oligarchs to be safe.
That's what they pushed on Joe Rogan. That's
what Carr's book says. That's what they want
from you, to passively let them take control
of your lives because they're the good leaders.
They're the good authoritarian despots.
You really think Joe's that stupid? You think
he doesn't recognize that all it is is
what's too too much, therefore due process doesn't
count here
even for people that aren't the point is
we don't know whether they're illegal or not
because you don't have due process. And Elon
Musk shares it.
You know, the South African oligarch technocrat who
wants you to believe he's America First even
though he's being driven by Israel like a
toy car.
Here
is where it comes together.
As we showed you earlier,
Palantir's and it's leaked because they don't want
you to know about this. Their own employees
make sure you found out
Palantir's plan to help ICE deport people. And
Derek said, who could have guessed this would
happen?
Derek could've,
and he did.
Just quickly to point out, Palantir, the surveillance
giant, who's working with Israel to kill people,
is taking on an increased role with the
immigration and with ICE, including finding the physical
location of people who are marked for deportation.
According to Palantir, Slacks and other internal messages
obtained by four zero four media. So are
you of the mind that they can somehow
pinpoint target and high and hone in on
just immigrants?
You'd be pretty dumb to think that. Because
you realize that means Palantir is now scanning
the country.
Everyone.
How else do you think they figure these
things out? They're using their databases. They've scooped
up from all of their $6,000,000,000,000
databases from the from the IRS, from the
GSA, and they're using all of that personal
information in the IRS, by the way. I
don't think I just said that. Did I
say that one already? Anyway, multiple
different massive
databases, which they've now exposed. They've they're and
don't don't forget, his XAI program is Twitter
now. They've combined. And so now they're scanning
and picking up all your data, training their
models, which in and of itself is a
massive crime and a massive privacy issue. But
now they're using all that, plus their Palantir
surveillance and their massive satellite ecosystem and their
biometric scans, and they're they're checking everybody in
this country. You walk through a store, they're
checking whether you're an alien. They're I mean,
this is how else do you think this
is happening?
The leak shows that Palantir's work with ICE
includes producing leads for law enforcement to find
people to deport and keeping track of the
logistics. Now it's not just cameras. It's a
lot more than that, guys. It is social
media. They are tracking you.
See, that used to matter to Republicans.
But I guess because they say evil bad
guy immigrant, then everybody shuts down, ignores the
reality.
Sad to me, but this is exactly, like,
damn near everything else before the fake selection
process that we told you was coming, that
I hope we were wrong about.
I mean, we're not even we're not even
six months in, guys, for crying out loud.
It's all right in front of you. And
just another addition, hackable animal posted this. He
says, look what I found here, and it
hasn't even reported yet.
Who is now embedded inside Citibank?
Guess what? Palantir. Now this is a smaller
point from what we're just talking about, but
just think about how clear this is. And
I'll just show you directly from it. He
posted it right there.
So Citibank
says
they've signed a partnership with Palantir to modernize
how we leverage data and improve client experience
and operational. I'm I'm willing to bet you
it's a hell of a lot more than
Citibank.
The point is a massive you know, the
ones that were basically Obama's administration,
don't miss that important overlap. They're just basically
this is in infiltrate this is across the
country,
and the world for that matter. Seeing as
how we know that Palantir is working with
Israel as well as the fact that,
Elon Musk, which is this is part of
it, guys,
is already working with the National Reconnaissance Office
well back in Biden's administration. That should matter
if you're smart enough to understand how that
contradicts their claim of the deep state or
democrat pedophile. They're working with both is the
point.
You can't hide, they said.
As he said, you can't hide because you're
now constantly being looked at. That was Biden's
administration that's been handed over to Trump's administration.
So otherwise known as just the US government
spying on you using this massive satellite,
you know, largest spy satellite network
ever, the world's largest.
Just consider what's going on,
what they're doing under the guise of going
after immigrants
for another country
and threatening to remove Americans from this country,
which has now happened for the fifth time.
And this is the fifth from Trump, by
the way. Levitt's mentioned it more than once.
We have we we've this has been floated
by Rubio. That goes back to February when
he went to visit El Salvador.
Rubio, on the record, said that they that
El Salvador
said to him that we can take your
US citizens as well.
So that I think that was letting the
cat out of the bag a little early,
don't you?
We talked about it on March 22. Trump
could send Americans to El Salvador. We talked
about it again on the third, more than
just these three times, by the way, but
Americans speaking out about Israel's genocide could be
next. In principle, it is the same. I
wanna include those in case you wanted to
watch it. The last one we just did
was the fourth time he suggested it. We're
gonna show you the fifth time today.
Before that, don't forget,
meet
it's Yakov Roth,
the Department of Justice attorney who's currently spearheading
The US slide into fascism,
as, as Jason writes,
fighting for deportation for Mahmoud Khalil and for
the right of the state to disappear people
to El Salvador without criminal charges.
K. For, you know, for the podcast, here
he is sitting on a tank with an
Israeli flag on it.
Just wanna make sure we don't miss what's
really going on as the DOJ attorney is
fighting to remove people for Israel and clearly
understand what's happening here at the Zionist infiltration
of this country is on overdrive.
And on top of that, I'll include this
show that I do think is very important
for that specific topic.
The new the new Trump administration and the
technocratic Zionist coup of the United States. Now
let's start with some of the most egregious
examples before we get into the American part
because because I do think it's important, but
this is insane to me how clear
how this put it all aside. Don't ignore
it because all that's important we're gonna come
back to. But just these cases alone show
you where we are.
This is from the April 15. ICE agents
realized they arrested wrong teen, say take him
anyway.
Federal immigration authorities apprehended a 19 year old
in New York despite realizing he was not
the intended target. The young man, his name
is Meruel Gutierrez
Gutierrez,
was later deported to El Salvador,
sent the notorious super prison despite his family's
insistence that he had no ties to gangs
or criminal history at all. Of course, you
know how we would know that for sure?
Due excuse me. Hiccup all of a sudden,
due process.
Same thing every time.
He realized this is despite the fact that
they are
well aware that without the Alien Enemies Act,
that they're required to give due process, and
they are anyway, but their mind was doing
that, gave them the leeway. The Supreme Court
ruled they had to do that with the
Alien Enemies Act. So now they just deported
people without any due process, without the Enemies
Aliens Act knowing what they're doing. On top
of the fact that the the court basically
ruled they weren't even they had to if
they were doing any of this, they had
to take some process.
They're not.
They seem to be going faster
into the point to where they just grab
the kid going for somebody else and they
take him anyway. He's already in El Salvador.
No criminal record.
It says his father, Wilmer Gutierrez, is now
searching for answers after his son was snatched
by immigration
and customs enforcement.
Quote, the officers grabbed him and two other
boys right at the entrance of our building.
One said, no. He's not the one.
Like, they were looking for someone else. But
the other said, take him anyway.
Wilmer told,
the the platform they're referencing, an independent nonprofit
newsroom dedicated to reporting from immigrant communities in
New York
City. What to know? Gutierrez, who fled instability
in Venezuela
and was pursuing an asylum case in The
United States. This this seems to be almost
everything we're talking about.
Was detained in Bronx by ICE agents conducting
a targeted operation. So they weren't even going
after him, mind you. So they grabbed him
because he was brown and in the same
place. You realize there's no indication that they
had any other reason to go after him
other than he was just there with them.
Guilt by association of someone that never improved
was guilty.
Now
if you're pursuing an asylum case,
you are not here illegally.
Simple as that.
Through the process and these are people that
are coming to try. They're not trying to
hop the fence and getting caught. That's what
all these ridiculous people online are blatantly as
blindly assuming because they need to or they
just don't care.
These are people that are going up either
through some normal channel, through using the app
or whatever else and saying, we are seeking
asylum, or I'll show you another example where
they're going up and saying, I I want
citizenship.
And are going through the process of actually
achieving citizenship and the Trump administration snatches them
up and sends them to El Salvador
without a criminal record, mind you. So this
is why it's so difficult for average people
to accept that because it's the exact opposite
of what they're hearing from Trump and Miller
and leave it. And everyone else blindly repeating
what they don't understand or lying to you
because it's obvious.
If they have no criminal record
and people like Khalil who were literally here
with a green card
and you're still fighting to send them away,
then we know what's happening here.
The point is that if you know these
things, stop falling into the partisan game or
stop being quiet about it. Just like with
COVID nineteen, when you knew these things were
dangerous and you didn't stand up and tell
your neighbor because you were afraid,
stand up.
Tell your neighbor.
Find the courage to call this out. Otherwise,
it's just like the other one. They may
die. They may get sent to El Salvador.
I'm not trying to make it hyperbolic. You
just have to realize that these are these
things are happening right now. In COVID nineteen,
they could've taken the shot, and maybe that
would've been it could've been deadly. In this
case, if you don't let them know what's
happening, they're gonna be one more voice adding
to remove
to destroy this country.
According to his father, the agents initially acknowledged
he was not the individual they were seeking,
but chose to take him anyway. Just days
later,
days later, from a kid they weren't even
seeking,
he was deported to El Salvador, where he
was transferred to a high security prison known
for housing members of violent gangs,
including transnational criminals.
An 18 year old kid. Can you even
imagine what that's gonna do to him if
he ever I mean, even a few a
week there. Guys, let's not sugarcoat the reality.
Places like this, you get beat up, you
get raped
because they allow this. That's the whole point.
And you've we've already gone over this. The
guy the the barber
was already shown the first time he was
there. He was getting beat up and slapped
around by the guards and then the prisoners.
And these are people with no criminal records,
so it's not like they have some toughness
to them. These are random people.
Says his family and attorneys say that he
has got no criminal record, no gang affiliations,
and not even a tattoo. So you wanna
explain to me how this all lines up?
So if you got no criminal record, no
tattoos,
simply I mean, again, guilt by association when
you haven't even proven the guilt of the
person you were actually going for nor given
them due process.
Wilmer Gutierrez spoke last to his son on
March 16.
March sixteenth. God. I can't even imagine what
that must be like for a parent who
knows their kid is innocent.
During a brief call allowed by the police
before he was sent, he spent days searching
for information,
visiting police stations, and this is what's so
gross about this. Like, where's the humanity on
this? I don't care whether you think they're
illegal aliens or not.
But what right do you have to snatch
these people with no process, not even try
to inform their family members, move them around
to play. I mean, if this is what
keeps happening, and they don't no one even
tries to facilitate anything. People are lost. Where'd
they go?
Luckily, in some cases, they find out by
seeing their face on some news channel, but
these people are think about how how alarming
that must be. Your son, your daughter, your
mother, your father just randomly disappears, and you
can't even figure it out. Then you just
it's over.
You just move on. You nobody's finding you.
You can't find out. You have some vague
idea of what might have happened. That's gotta
be one of the most torturous things I
can imagine.
During the call,
other than torture, obviously, in the sense of
emotional, during the call, Merwell Gutierrez said he
was being held in Pennsylvania before he was
moved
and expected to be transferred to Texas before
being returned to Venezuela.
That transfer never happened. So here's the thing.
Why are these people who have never been
to El Salvador being sent to El Salvador?
I mean, they have no legal precedent for
any of this, quite frankly. Let alone sending
another person who's never like, to a country
they've never been from with no crime, no
investigation,
no charges,
and you're paying for that.
Wilmer Gutierrez later discovered through a news report,
like I said, that his son had been
deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies
Act.
Videos circulating online showed detainees in harsh conditions,
their head shaved. Of course, no due process
despite rulings. Quote, I could have understood if
he'd been sent back to Venezuela,
but why to a foreign country he's never
been to?
They applied, of course, when they so this
is the important part, guys. When they came
here, they applied for temporary protected status.
While waiting for their immigration appointment,
they took temporary jobs and slept near the
border to keep their place in line.
Now the point is this is the overlapping
ideas. The people are in the process of
something.
They're not illegal aliens. Now look. I'm not
defending the weaponization of all of this. I
get it. But if your answer is to
do the wrong thing on the other side
of it, then you're you're part of the
problem.
The last thing we argue anybody should be
arguing is the removal of rights, the suspension
of rights because of what they've allowed to
happen, I argue, for that very purpose.
Now William Parra, an immigration attorney
from,
from a platform said, Merriell was detained for
hanging out with friends and was at the
wrong place at the wrong time. Ice was
not looking for him, nor is there any
evidence whatsoever that he was in any gang.
But, apparently, today, it doesn't matter. That has
to be showing to people, guys. And if
your only response is to assume he must
have been, then you are part of the
problem. Even if he is, you should be
demanding that they prove these things. Otherwise, you
don't care where this country is going.
I mean, if you think it's only one
side, then what happens when Democrats take this
power and use it against you?
Now
a Trump supporter
was also taken.
ICE detains Trump voter now for just so
it's clear, as far as I understand it,
that that 18 year old kid is in
El Salvador.
Probably never gonna come back unless we
successfully get all these people returned if that's
what that you know? Well, let's be clear.
Even the ones that are, like, MS thirteen
gang members, for example,
the reality should still be that they're required
to prove that. So if if you want
if the idea is that they bring them
back for the process and then send and
then deport them or put them in jail,
then that's the reality. I'm not disputing that
people who are illegally here should be deported
or should be charged with a crime. I've
never said otherwise.
But I demand that our government do it
by the process that was enshrined in the
constitution or that they prove their claims. Anyone
saying that they don't care about that?
I mean, it's worthy of ridicule, guys. You
literally are saying I don't care that the
government
were that we're asked that the government is
not required to prove allegations against anybody.
This is wild.
Long time first time says, ICE detains Trump
voter celebrating Palm Sunday.
Now we have to oh, you you can't
miss the overlap to what's going on here
from what Batar USA, for example, Israel groups
are literally driving the Trump administration to do.
They're taking lists directly from Zionist organizations and
acting against them. That's why we keep seeing
this, and I honestly think that's why it's
so frivolous.
But they're just taking it and running with
it. And it turns out that they're just
people that said bad things about Israel. They're
not even criminals, not even here illegally, but
they don't care.
In this case, a Trump supporter.
He said he was treated like a criminal.
He's been a US citizen for ten years.
He said, I really thought things would change
when we have mister Trump in office. Change
for the better, he said. Things actually change
for the worse.
Now what's interesting is you're gonna get a
number of things people acting like you know,
the problem is that people are so ideologically
captured that if it doesn't fit in, then
they go, he's not that or he's lying.
The reality is, guys, you can see this
happening everywhere.
If you if you can't wrap your mind
around the obvious nature of somebody, whatever their
political standing, getting wrapped up in this because,
hey. Guess what? They're not checking. They're not
proving. They're not giving due process. So, like,
that's my point. It could be a Trump
supporter. It could be an American citizen, and
we would never know because they're not required
to put evidence forward.
I think it's absolutely clear what's happening. Now
it's a this person was not
taken
for obvious reasons. The point though is that
the reality of where this is going. And
we're gonna go into the next one who
is an American citizen who, thank god, was
also released.
But the reality is this is happening, and
we already know that there are people who
are being sent without crimes, without any due
process. That is happening, and the principle is
exactly the same. I feel we're building slowly
in the direction of where the shoo will
drop soon, and I hope I'm wrong.
He just reached for his gun. He's like,
step out of the vehicle right now.
I said, okay. I'm stepping out. Bashir Atala
recounts the moments he says US Customs and
Border agents detained him and his wife for
several hours Sunday night. For no reason Now
now just think about that.
Drawing your gun,
and this guy's not a criminal
because they he because he's on a list.
Now where do you think that list came
from? And why would they act so certainly
from a list like that to the point
where you draw a gun on a person
who's not armed, who has no just no
legal back no background showing he's a violent
criminal at all?
I mean, just I mean, there's a lot
of things you could fill in the gaps
with. Question everything. Don't assume, but just recognize
how clearly there's a problem if this is
how this is going.
And even if there was any reason that
I don't know about, they didn't even share
that reason with me. Atala is a US
citizen. The couple was come So, again, sorry.
No warrant. No no identification.
That's where we are right now. Home after
visiting family for Palm Sunday. I was detained.
I was not free to leave. Holding sense.
No shoes. No jacket. I was freezing cold.
The real estate attorney says the officers wouldn't
let him call his sister an immigration attorney.
She tells us she didn't get a call
until three hours later. What happened to my
brother is not reasonable. It's it's an abuse
of power. Celine says CBP accessed Bashir's email,
which contained client information under duress.
Vashear says he declined going to the hospital
after experiencing chest pain because he didn't want
to start the whole process over again. So
just in case you missed that,
a person who was not what they want
or looking for, who they've released was still
violated. The privacy was still violated. They still
comb through your information.
Isn't that a crime? I mean, do we
care about that? Where's the where's the the
the
the,
justifiable
like, where is the reason behind this? You
know, I the point is, guys, they're acting
on assumption from somebody,
some Israeli list they're taking, and they're acting
in ways that violate the constitutional rights of
this American. But it's the same principle whether
it's an illegal alien or anybody else. But
you just look at the consistency here. These
people are acting like lawless agents. This is
everything we've always been said we were fighting,
or this is exactly what they were saying
the left was gonna be doing.
It's all the same thing.
We asked New Hampshire based immigration attorney, Ron
Abramson, about this case, which he isn't affiliated
with. I mean, detaining people with no basis
is not something America does. This sort of
ins Not what it's supposed to do, but
it's done for a long time. To then
raises the question of how far will this
go,
and is anyone safe? Selena Tala asking another
question.
What message are we sending to people who
are legally in this country? I really felt
like a criminal.
Customs and border protection officials got back to
us, at about 03:45 this afternoon. They say,
quote, the traveler's accusations are blatantly false and
sensationalized.
CBP officers acted in accordance with established protocols.
See, now that's the problem.
So who cares if it's established protocols? Is
it within law? Did you or, you know,
that that's the just because Trump's administration says
those are the protocols, doesn't mean you're so
that you're illegally allowed to violate the constitutional
rights of Americans
or anybody else.
But you see where this goes. Right? That
what they said is wait. Well, what what
what's false about it?
What what because the the reality is you
could break down what actually happened, and the
reality is we can see this happening all
over the country. The problem is they're trying
to kind of mask this in the idea
that this is about something other than what
is happening, which is just a broad stroke
actions against anybody in the right the wrong
place at the
right time.
Upon arrival at the port of entry, the
traveler was appropriately referred to secondary inspection, a
routine lawful process that occurs daily and can
apply for any traveler.
Yes. Except for the fact that he was
taken under the guise of being an illegal
alien, was told I mean, you you you
go through it all for yourself. The point
is it's very clear this was somebody who
was arrested under that context. They they comb
through his personal information.
He's an American citizen.
Right? In what world do you I mean,
this this is the the problem is that
they're using this to slowly encroach and slowly
rather create precedence on why if they just
have the right narrative that day, then these
things are basically put on pause. It's the
same conversation across the board.
And this gets even more intense. This this
one's in this one's wild to me because
of the judge that was basically
saying that she didn't have any power
despite her proving that that this was an
American citizen with The US with the Social
Security card, with the birth certificate,
but it doesn't matter. Because, apparently, right now,
ICE is in control.
Just got done. I'm here in the Leon
County Courthouse where we just got done with
the first appearance of, Juan Carlos Lopez Gomez
who was detained Wednesday in Florida,
and he had charges of,
entering
the state, as an unauthorized
immigrant. However, he is an American citizen. So
remember, the claim is entering as an unauthorized
citizen. So even though he's got documentation, the
claim that he entered illegally is what get
thrown gets thrown at him. Him. And even
though they present the documentation, they say, well,
we have they have to go through the
process. What process? If the claim is he's
not an American, here's his license right there.
See, the problem is, though, is that these
are being broadly laid out. They're just kinda
scooping up everybody, and then people are falling
through the cracks, if not deliberately being put
in them, guys.
You can decide that. But are we okay
with innocent people ending up in torture camps
around the world because they just don't because
they wanna just get the most possible or,
you know, whatever the argument is.
Everything comes down to the violation of your
rights. And if they're gonna do it to
to illegal immigrants, you're gonna be next. It's
the same principle as the point. His mother
came to the courthouse,
showed his birth certificate and his Social Security
number card, and that still wasn't enough to
get him released.
The judge just said that she was sorry,
and,
the attorney working for the state, said that
because,
he had an ice hold, he couldn't be
released k. Even if the court didn't find
probable cause for his arrest. So that what
they're showing you, at least in the mind
of that judge, an ice hold now supersedes
the judicial branch or at least in that
context, that you're not that you can rule
right there that this person is not actually
what they claim.
Now, I mean, look. If if you can't
see like, if this was the only case,
I would be less strict. I would be
less like, my point is you could argue
that maybe I would be I wouldn't be
as,
I mean, not as harsh about it.
Just because it's one case and you never
know. But the bottom line is we can
stand back and look at the big picture
right now and see that the recurring actions
are sloppy, if not deliberately so. And people
like this are either being caught in this
or deliberately put in this because they're on
a list.
So drop site news covered this. US citizen
born in Georgia has been arrested for entering
Georgia as an unauthorized alien despite not being
that. During a hearing in Leon County, his
mother presented his his identification,
but the judge said she had no authority
to release him.
Just think about that. He was on hold
for forty eight hours, and these detentions we've
seen are which are harsh. In many cases,
not made for more than twelve hours.
So, you know, it says, screenshots from the
the office.
Just information if you wanna check it for
yourself. The point is he has been released.
Here they are at the Leon County Jail
with their with the mom,
20 year old
US citizens arrested for illegal ending Florida after
a traffic stop. So that see, it's all
you know, that's one of the things we
keep seeing too, is you got people that
are being picked up because they have some
parking tickets
and just happen to be the wrong you
know, really, I promise you this is what
it comes down to. People who have on
social media said the wrong things about Israel.
Who have been a part of a protest,
for example, and then the smallest infraction.
And they're be and they're and they're kicking
people out of the country
all over the place.
And and some of them guys, how crazy
it is? They're talking about people with no
record who are being scooped up like that
and being sent to places like El Salvador.
Like, somehow we man we argue that's justifiable.
Now here he is hugging his mom. He
got released yesterday.
Now the point though is the ongoing reality
of this is that you can be swept
up into something like this and, you know,
for look. This is the real point to
take away from this.
If there's no due process like we're seeing,
right, and this person gets swept up,
put in this process, and they broad stroke
these conversations, and suddenly, he's on the next
plane to El Salvador.
Well, here we go. There's another mistaken error,
and sorry. We can't get him back, which
is what they keep telling you. If you
can't piece together right there why this is
so important, then I don't think you want
to.
We need to demand that they go through
the legal processes or this is going to
happen. And I think by design, quite frankly,
but the very least, accident, an American or
anybody else. Because right there, you could see
how easily this could go. He's in there
for forty eight hours.
Let's just say he had the wrong tattoo.
You know? Whatever else. Suddenly, he's caught up
in this group. The group gets sent. That
already happened.
Just because he wasn't a US citizen has
not changed the reality that he was legally
in this country.
Even Garcia were they they keep claiming he
was here illegally. That wasn't the case. Just
like the process of either seeking asylum, being
given asylum, being, you know, seeking,
actual citizenship, whether you have it or not,
you're not an illegal alien if you're in
the process.
He was given that asylum.
They just keep saying illegal alien, terrorist, human
trafficker because they know they need to bury
this very dangerous case for
them and claims that he's a monster.
US citizen, guys.
Now Melnick also points this out. This is
Aaron from the was it the full name
again? American Immigration Council.
Just again, the reason I keep I he
follows account. Doesn't mean you believe in everything
he's saying. Like, I don't know what the
argument that you somehow blindly take sides because
you follow somebody is ridiculous. That's partisanship for
you. The point is that he gives you
source material.
That's all that should matter. Read it for
yourself.
The problem is that people don't wanna read
the source material. They wanna listen to their
chosen ideologue.
What he's pointing out here is that a
few things about the case we just discussed
with this girl, he that the,
I forgot his name. Her the one the
one she was referring to. Here the the
the the young man. He appears to have
been charged under a law which is currently
enjoined by a federal court which would make
the arrest and charges unlawful.
So think of that's on top of everything
else. Local law enforcement are actually not required
to honor ice holds. So what that shows
me again is the judge at least is
either too afraid to speak out
or thought otherwise,
and that is alarming.
Oh, and this was just the
same thing. Just this Jackie, Yano's looks like
covering the story, showing you that they've been
released.
Now
the fifth time, I won't play them all
again, but I just want you to remember
that for the fifth time now, Donald Trump
has floated this idea.
I don't know how we could pretend like
this should not be taken seriously at this
point. If even one of them was said,
it should be enough.
But here it was on March 26 where
I floated or I I stated that Trump
has floated sending Americans to El Salvador.
I said this is an attack on all
you believe you're fighting
for under a thin veneer of fighting Democrats.
Because he names the Tesla terrorists and what
the focus will be. Right? Now this was
the fourth time.
I just didn't have this who others before
that? Even a fifth bar or four of
a sixth and a seventh, by the way,
if you look at Rubio and and what
Levitt has said more than once. But for
the fourth time, on April 14, Trump admin
tells you that they're considering sending
Americans to foreign prisons.
Regardless of the severity of their claims or
crimes, excuse me, this isn't just unconstitutional. It's
illegal.
That's not an opinion. That's a fundamental fact.
The the amount of people arguing otherwise,
it it show that's the days where I
get overwhelmed
because it just I I worry. I know
people in my life that are falling for
this stuff. So I just wonder whether there's
that many people that just actually don't know
they're wrong.
Are people out there that just don't care
because they just hate people like this so
much
even though you don't know them?
It worries me. For the blind supporters,
the simple answer question simple question is, would
you support this if Biden was doing it?
For exactly the same thing. The same people,
the same thing, and this was Obama or
Clinton standing back there.
We all know the answer to that, and
that shows you the reality, guys. Hopefully, that
wakes a few of you free from this
to realize that it should matter
regardless of who it is because it is
a problem.
This person says, if they beat 90 year
olds with baseball bats, if they rape 80
year old women,
is I would support
anyone wanting to send those fools out of
here. You see? You know? And look. I
mean, it's ImeriCann,
small count.
Point.
If you're going to take him seriously as
he's trolling, then at least give your audience
the full context to what he said. Well,
that's exactly what he said, by the way.
So these are people trying to gaslight you.
K? First of all, trolling, and that's why
I included that. I'm telling you guys, there's
people telling you that he's just not he's
that what he's doing is okay. People telling
you that you're wrong about what he's saying.
People telling you that you're just being trolled,
and he's you know, it's it's very Israeli
right now. Then just go, here's 75 different
possible narratives. You pick which one you like
best as long as it's not the real
one, which is that they're undermining the constitution.
The point is it doesn't matter the severity
of the claims, guys. It doesn't matter. The
principle is all that matters. If it's a
grandma beat beating, raping maniac or a guy
walking the street at the wrong time, it
is the same point. Rights don't change based
on the severity of your crime, neither does
free speech, but that's what they want you
to think.
And Matt Lockwood rightly says, I don't give
an f about him trolling. He's the president
of The United States. Nothing this unconstitutional
should be used for trolling. And he's not
trolling, guys. That's the point is we already
see what's happening.
And if it's not just Trump's administration, it's
just the government. Look back. Obama and the
indefinite attention of Americans that they've all continued
to put forward. The Patriot Act, they've all
continued. The War Powers Act, the the FISA
act act of of FISA all of it,
guys. Every one of them have continued the
same things, and we can't see that they're
all the same thing.
And this one is interesting to that that
response right there. This person says, good.
Heinously violent criminals, again, assuming that's what we're
talk just because he goes grandma rapists and
this, that means everyone he's sending is like
that? No. Here's a guy who's innocent here
legally with no criminal record, but you hate
him, don't you? Because Trump said grandma rapists.
Well, heinously violent criminals, he says, are being
treated too softly here.
Well, there's the law, and there's not the
law. But he goes, if it's between a
death penalty or horrible jail, I'd rather them
suffer in a SHIT
hole jail. He's not talking about average b
and e criminals here.
See, I I some I know whether at
the bottom or not that these people are
real out there. Some people have opinions like
this.
It's insane. Same point. It doesn't matter.
If you care about constitutional rights, if you
care about free speech, if you care about
anything we're talking about, it doesn't matter what
crime we're discussing.
That's what he's using to convince small minded
people to think that it makes sense because
bad crime.
Well, crime is applied with the law. Doesn't
matter what have the the crime is applied
with the law that fit. The reality is
your constitutional rights apply no matter what as
you guys all know.
I simply said, IDF bots have been allowed
to flood this platform.
CHEQ
actively driving you driving you through propaganda to
destroy your own country, in my opinion.
I said, is this one of them below?
Or just a painfully uninformed uneducated partisan American?
You can decide.
Now this one you might not have seen
before we get to the fifth example. This
is what Jason Basler shared this with me.
Here's Trump getting caught on elite
video with with Bukele Bukele, however you say
his name,
floating and laughing about the idea of sending
homegrown
Americans to foreign presence. But he's trolling though,
guys. He's just making fun of you.
And I just wanna thank and these people
That's not the one. Here it is. No.
No. I'm not I'm not a good supporter.
I want a home
grown criminals
next. Yeah. I said home grown is the
next.
The home grown's built. You gotta build about
five more places. Yeah. I mean, that's fair.
Alright? Yeah. It's
not
big enough.
They're all just just yucking it up, sitting
there laughing about building prisons for Americans to
rot in El Salvador.
I mean, it because by pre in principle,
it doesn't matter the crime like we're saying.
It doesn't matter what crime we're talking about.
There's no legal precedent to send literally anybody
to a foreign prison that with your tax
dollars, let alone American citizens
for which there are crimes and processes.
I I again, like, I have these moments
where I'm like, I this can't be real.
We cannot be in this position with Americans
who ten seconds ago were the ones screaming
about the importance of the constitution
now being the ones asking for you to
destroy it because brown people, because Israel narrative,
because whatever else, or severe beaten grandma crimes.
It doesn't change the reality that you're being
convinced to undermine what you are fighting for.
It's flabbergasting to me. I said it just
doesn't stop. Please find the courage to call
this out before it's too late.
And Jason says not only did Trump flirt
with deporting US citizens, he was also caught
on hot mic saying home groans are next.
Let me see if this pops up.
Yeah. I'm glad I grabbed that.
This was from February 4, guys.
So if you don't think this is a
clear agenda, you're not paying attention in my
opinion.
Rubio says El Salvador offers to accept US
deportees
of any nationality,
including
violent American criminals.
February 4,
like, well before this became a big talking
point. Here we are. Five times, Donald Trump
has now floated the idea of doing that.
Who do you think that benefits, guys? Do
you think that benefits the American
American people? Do you think that builds our
understanding of what we believe in? There's only
one real thing that this works for right
now, guys, and it's not American interest. It
sure as hell not America First. Here's what
Trump just said again.
We use it for
violent criminals, our own violent criminals. I call
them homegrown criminals. I mean, the homegrown The
homegrowns could be that grew up and something
went wrong and they hit people over the
head with a baseball bat.
We have, and push people into subways
just before the train gets there like you
see happening sometimes.
We are looking into it, and we wanna
do it. I I would love to do
that. I'd love to do that, he says.
And as, again, always using the most extreme
examples because he knows that'll get some people.
But okay. Explain this for me. So he's
tell telling you, it's all the radical crazy
ones. Right? Okay.
Well, so he said that with the the
deportation. Right? Going after all the worst criminal
rapist terrorists except here's a PhD student and
here's a here's one from Tufts and here's
a Harvard student and here's one from from
Columbia. All, you know, high level academics.
Oh, all of them have no criminal record,
by the way. Or or, oh, here are
all the people that are the evil gang
members except he's not and he's not and
he's here legally.
Right. So ask yourself, maybe the same thing
will happen there. Just maybe. They'll give you
the claim of the big bad thing and
then do whatever they want.
Pretty much how it's always gone.
Sure wish we could have the memory to
understand how many times that's happened over and
over in this country left or right, but
Trump has now enthusiastically
discussed sending Americans to foreign prisons for the
fifth time
using, of course, the same terminology that the
left used
back in 02/2016
or about January.
We all we already forgot that, didn't we?
Who are America's homegrown terrorists? Are we are
we forgetting that Biden's discussion?
Hold on. Where was that?
That's weird.
One second.
God. That's so crazy how sometimes these thing
god. That's so wild. Here's the article I
was just going for. Don't even want to
tell you what just happened. Waste time.
The old broken Internet that we live in
today or the manufacture you know, everything's broken
weird. But here here is what Whitney wrote
for TLAB back in 2021.
Who is a terrorist in Biden's America?
Well, guess what? It's the same person as
a terrorist in Trump's America.
People that speak out against the government.
Whatever the claim is, whatever the narrative, that's
where this goes.
So it's the same exact thing we're dealing
with now.
Right?
So the same thing. The homegrown terrorist, the
domestic terrorist focus, which we've been telling you
is building, which has been coming. They use
the red hats, and they use antisemitism, and
now they're using the Democrats and antisemitism.
Almost like it's the same thing. Crazy. Right?
Right in front of you.
Here is the NPR article in case you
wanna check it out. So here are some
comments that I wanna share that I maybe
I'll skip some because it's just sort of
redundant. But some of these people say interesting
things.
So Tanya
says,
just because it offends your feelers does not
mean it's illegal or unethical.
Well, it is though, both of those things,
regardless of whether I care about it, which
is just, you know so the response is
that you have an emotional response
despite what I'm saying is we can literally
I mean, this is what scares me. Do
they not know they're wrong? Is it a
bot? Maybe it's maybe it's not worth the
time. The Saturn here, at least some people
go, yep. It is illegal and unethical.
Here's the link to the constitutional reality. Of
course, no response. So that tells me it's
probably a bot trying to get some engagement
to get at the top of the conversation.
The the the change is that people out
there do think these things, though, and they
do fall for it.
Yes. It is unconstitutional. It is illegal. There's
no way around it. That's 100%
accurate. I mean, look, it's even by their
own arguments. If the argument is we just
can't do it, it's too busy, it'll take
up too much time, they're not even trying
to argue that it's legal or that it's
they're telling you. It is, but it's okay
because it's just too much to do.
This person says the same thing. Will they
be oh, this I already read that one
for you that they're trolling.
E said Epunk says, if they are blatant
traitors who committed treason against our country,
they are anti American
and don't deserve the rights of American citizens
because they hate America.
My god. Talk about the word the dumbest
argument of the day. Well, see, this is
the problem, though. So now by that logic,
Democrats can do that, oh, and here comes
Jay. You mean, like, the January?
Oops.
Of course, to him, that doesn't make sense
because we're not bad guys.
But you you know, that's it's just dumb,
guys. It's ignorance or a bot. Because the
point is, it doesn't
the the Democrats are the government too. So
your argument is that if the government decides
you're a traitor, that they can take your
rights away.
Thank you for being exactly the problem that
they want. You are literally what they're hoping
for. This person is the agenda, like, exactly
what they want from you.
I don't know why we can't see that
right now, at least some people. It's so
transparent right now. Now this is an interesting
clip.
Should I close that the wrong one? Yeah.
Okay. This is an interesting clip. Now I'm
gonna go over this where we get to
Van,
was Van Holland as well as this guy.
You know my opinion, guys. I don't think
I don't trust government in general. I don't
think anybody in these power positions are at
the very least, we should not trust any
of them.
Whether they're honest or not, that's just that's
just smart. We should be questioning them more
than ever, especially if we want better from
them. I am of the mind just because
of history. Look back how often it's verified
for us. These people are just opportunists
who do the right thing where it suits
them, where it benefits them in some way.
Now look. I guarantee in some cases I'm
wrong. I just because I mean, I'd have
to believe in some cases there. But, you
know, but based on history and precedent and
facts, it's a a good bet to say
that these people aren't really
usually doing what they claim they're doing.
But just as from a human point, I
have to believe there's some positivity out there.
My point saying all that is here's rep
Jim McGovern standing up and saying the right
thing. Now that's not to say that
he's the right guy. Never is that the
argument. But what frustrates me is the same
point. Is it because
he's somebody
that's seen as the wrong guy? He's the
democrat. Then suddenly him saying it means that
what that he's saying is wrong. It's an
easy way to get you to ignore the
obvious if they just throw at you the
two party illusion. Right? Same with the Democrats.
If you get a Republican coming out and
saying the thing they want, they'll go no
because that's the that's lazy thinking.
Right now, regardless of who says this, it's
easy to prove this is a problem, and
it should be called out.
Excuse me. Senator Grassley,
on that same subject,
the constitution,
the framers of the constitution
said that every person Right. Not citizen,
every person within the jurisdiction of The United
States has due process. That's right. That's right.
That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right.
That
as the people, the
congress, who are supposed to reign in this
dictator,
what are you going to do about these
people who've been sentenced to life imprisonment in
a foreign country
with no due process.
Many of them who were here legally
and had no criminal record for the umpteenth
time.
Alright? But, buddy, because because he called them
a dictator,
they're all the team sport Republicans are gonna
push back and say it's all false and
ignore, and that's probably how it was meant
to go.
Ignore the facts in there, which are that
this is illegal, that is unconstitutional
regardless of what other democrat, republican narratives get
thrown in.
Why won't you do your job, Senator?
Yeah.
Get it. Why? The Supreme Court. Trump's not
obeying the Supreme Court. He just
So he says ask yourself what's going to
stop the government from retort deporting you.
See? And and you get the Rubio's out
there framing this like some flailing democrat argument
and the
let's try to think of another example of
what's his name I'll point to in a
second. You know, the the the Posobics and
the rest of them out there are gaslighting
the whole thing
and screening the same thing instead of just
acknowledging that, yes, obviously, because even Trump has
floated the idea of doing that next.
So your argument is that somehow it's a
Democrat thing to suggest you could be next
even though Trump has literally said you could
be next? That seems pretty stupid, but people
fall in the cracks all the time.
This is how would you prove it's an
error if you don't have due process? Guys,
this is what I was saying well before
this became a talking point in the corporate
media.
It's front honestly, half the time, I wonder
whether that's why this is happening. You do
know that TLAB is far more influential than
we ever give it credit for. We know
that. But it's funny to me how clearly
we were saying, like, day one, we were
making these same points
because it's factually correct, not because it's a
partisan thing. If it can happen to anyone,
it can happen to you. That's obvious.
Now this is wild to me. Kennedy already
came out and showed himself to be an
idiot about this conversation, partisan, I should say,
because he knows he's wrong. They all know
they're wrong. I think that's obvious.
This is pursuit I can't speak for itself.
It's wild to me. So
senator Kennedy's asked about this,
saying you have a smart legal mind, and
he's confronted with what Trump just said about
sending American citizens to a foreign prison.
There's no error in that conversation, guys. It's
not only unprecedented.
It's very clear that's against it violates constitution
in multiple ways.
Here's what he says about this, and it
just shows you how clearly this is a
one this is a lockstep agenda. And it's
and even the Democrats aren't really doing anything
about it. They're they're out there screaming and
pulling their putting their hair on fire, but
no one's doing anything. Congress should be already
taking action against so many things that have
happened. I'm gonna come to that in a
second because it's a terrifying reality of where
we go next if nothing happens from congress.
And even if they do, if they just
continue to they have no power,
I I think we're already beginning to see
that we don't live in the place we
think we've you know, if we ever have
that we think we do.
A new sound from president Trump,
who is sitting down with Rachel Campos Duffy,
at 04:00 eastern time on the Fox Spanish
channel. And he said this
on that. Listen.
Could we use it for
violent criminals, our own violent criminals? I call
them homegrown criminals. Yes. I mean, the homegrown
The homegrowns could be. The ones that grew
up and something went wrong and they hit
people over the head with a baseball bat.
We have, and push people into subways
just before the train gets there, like you
see happening sometimes.
We are looking into it, and we wanna
do it. I I would love to do
that. Well, senator Kennedy, you are a smart
legal mind. Do you have any problem with
that?
No. None. I I think the president's right.
Oh my god.
I mean, how do you make sense of
that?
See, this is what's scary,
is that you will get people that aren't
smart enough to understand that's wrong, who will
just go along with the guy who she
he you have a smart legal mind, so
blindly agree with whatever he says next.
Wait. Where's the pushback? I mean, it's it's
mind blowing to me. I mean, you realize
we have people like conservative justices, like conservative
like judge judge Knapp, for example, like, I
mean, any other people we're talking about that
are calling this out all across the line
or judge rulings like we said in the
past, like the foundational Supreme Court rulings that
have already made these cases clear.
These people are literally destroying this country for
a foreign power in my opinion, and we're
watching it happen in front of us. And
whatever you think the background is, you have
to understand. What he just said there should
you should be running him out of town.
This is like them standing up and saying,
Trump is gonna remove all the guns from
everybody because illegal immigrants
are using them first. There's so many guns.
We're gonna remove them all first, and we'll
deal with it afterward. Oh, yeah. That makes
sense because immigrants.
It's the same difference in principle, guys. What
they're arguing is we don't have to give
rights to people because of the skirt of
and be let's be clear.
Americans.
The one point he's talking about right now
is Americans
sending Americans to foreign prisons,
whether criminals or not. And the great legal
mind said, yeah. No big deal.
I'd love for you to give one example,
Kennedy, of any context, of any precedent, of
any law that says you're allowed to send
Americans anywhere outside this country against their will
whether criminals or not.
The rights are very clear about how this
goes. They know that. They don't care. It's
it's absolutely chilling to me.
And see, this is what kills me, guys,
is that I have to sit here and
argue against people that know they're lying.
Now am I crazy? Does everybody out there
out there already know that? Am I only
arguing with a bunch of morons like Katroo
online, or is this something that everybody already
sees,
or are we actually falling to this right
now?
I don't know. That's what worries me.
Here's another example.
And, of course, because it's CNN and the
responses come back and forth, they're gonna the
democrats are bad. We're right no matter what.
Facts don't matter. Same thing the left did
during COVID nineteen. It's the same stupid thing
over and over, and we just get to
oscillate around. One day, I'm a crazy Republican.
Next day, I'm a crazy lefty. And reality
is we're simply staying
consistent with our principles about what matters, what's
correct, what's right, what's legal, what's constitutional.
In this case, it starts with a quick
point about the Supreme Court ruling we're gonna
talk about next, but goes into the American
so realize, five times Trump has said that
now. Five times. This was on the sixteenth.
So there were four times
when this was recorded, four times Trump has
happily discussed sending American citizens to a foreign
country. And the way he responds acts like
it couldn't be possible.
And the Supreme Court did weigh in and
say,
that that it agreed with the with that
it agreed with the district
judge saying that, the US administration It did
not.
God. So here we go. This is just
the opening point. We'll get to this next.
This is so I mean, again, I I'm
of the mind that somebody like this, he's
actually doesn't know he's wrong. He could know
he's wrong. He doesn't care, which is more
alarming, but realize that it's undeniable. You can
I'll go through it myself and read it
to you like I've already done. Both of
them. Both nine zero rulings in the supreme
court, which both clearly acknowledge everything we're talking
about. And he only pushes back because they've
been told to.
Like, this is the near you can't let
them say that. You know, we won that.
Like, Miller screams.
They did not.
The judges themselves say that's not true. And
here we are with him pushing back on
CNN because mindless followers will see him say
it and go, yeah.
Dunk on those Democrats.
You're falling for it. Oh, not that fall
Let me finish my sentence. Congressman, I know
you're trying to create a moment. Have clarification.
You're trying to create a moment right now
to try to get pickup, and that's that's
self serving. That's not serving our viewers. Trying
to commit commit the moment here. Yeah. Both
of you.
As always,
both of you. We know that. No. What
I am laying out here
is facts.
The Supreme Court, the four page opinion,
agreed with the lower court judge that it
should the administration should, quote, unquote, facilitate his
return. Now in terms of effectuate,
it left it to the lower court That's
not facts. To clarify. And it said that
the president facts.
Everyone can read it. It's online. And it
said that the president Yes. They do. Does
have foreign affairs,
protections and that the district court judge time.
Should take that into account
when,
providing that clarification.
That's exactly
what was said. It was not a forceful
opinion. It was not it was it certainly
had ambiguity,
but that's what the Supreme Court said. The
president also says he's looking into deporting US
citizens who have committed violent crimes.
Many legal experts say that's just flatly unconstitutional.
Do you agree? I hate the way they
say that. Many legal expert
it's it's
black and white.
It's point blank unconstitutional.
Like, but, you know, they I bet you
she's never read it for all we know,
but it's just I hate that. But that's
the way he responds. Four times he said
that already. Publicly, multiple channels. Three with the
president on this case, or do you think
he should back off this threat?
I didn't hear what he said specifically. I'm
not sure what the context is, so I'm
not gonna comment on what the context of
that comment was because I don't think the
president would be inferring that he's gonna break
the constitutionality,
of due process for citizens of The United
States. I think That's literally exactly what he's
saying.
And he said it more than once.
If they're bad guys, though, so it's okay.
Right? Just look online. So he either knows
that and is afraid to talk about it,
or he's literally just gleaning what he he's
not looking, which seems to make sense when
he doesn't even understand the ruling of the
supreme court or he's lying about it.
Yeah. And look. It's it's not about one
side, guys. The way the right is doing
this right now is lit I mean, it
may be more severe in some cases,
but it is just as completely
blinded by the narrative as the left was
during COVID.
It's the same thing. They're just using the
partisanship
back and forth on this ending never ending
hamster wheel or teeter totter to get people
to follow just a little bit more.
It's absurd.
Here
is Gorka.
How this guy ever ended up? I mean,
it's just so alarming to see these complete
hacks on, like, ending up in positions of
power. He says, this is Trump's counterterrorism
czar. That's fantastic. He says, now saying that
anyone advocating for due process is aiding and
abetting terrorists.
So I'll let him speak first. Listen to
what he says. The idea that simply suggesting
that what they're doing is wrong, he's trying
to threaten you right now. He's trying to
scare you like everything else they're doing from
standing up and pointing out what hap what's
happening is wrong. Listen to what he says.
As the the taxonomy
of politics in America is dead, it's not
left and right. It's not even Republican or
Democrat. There's one line that divides us. Do
you love America, or do you hate America?
It's really quite that simple. Yeah. He's almost
not wrong, by the way. Now what what's
crazy is he goes on to frame the
people that are violating the constitution as the
ones loving America and the ones that are
calling that out as the ones that don't.
Frankly, both of those sides are the ones
that are undermining this country, and the American
people that are recognizing what's going on are
the ones fighting for this that love America.
Well, I also I'll I'll overlap that with
the nuance, which is there's a lot of
people on both the partisanships that are convinced
what they're doing is for the country.
But I have to say that the only
way that makes sense to me is that
they're just not bright enough to see that
they're being played. I mean, it's very simple
in my pie. I think it's very obvious.
It's like, again, reading the, you know, reading
the first amendment and arguing they can censor
you whenever they want as long as they
make a good excuse. Well, then you haven't
read the first amendment. Like, it just doesn't
make any sense. But the point is he
goes on to frame it that way. And
we have people who love America, like the
president, like his cabinet, like the directors of
his agencies, who want to protect
Americans.
And then there is By destroying your rights.
Right? To protect Americans by threatening to send
them to foreign countries. Now look. Americans don't
mean the ones not breaking the law. That
means everybody
or accused of breaking the law.
Right? If you're a criminal, you're still an
American, guys. So they they they're just playing
this game by driving you further, further into
these categories.
What they're doing is destroying this country in
a thousand different ways, your government, not just
the right or just the left. People like
this are either too dumb to know they're
seeing that they're involved in that or are
actively trying to drive you into a clear
direction.
I mean, I've never seen a more obvious
example of what you you think Gorka wouldn't
call this out if Biden was doing this?
If Biden was sending people in red hats
to foreign countries or let's just say people
who are here on visas who are protesting
the trucker convoy and send them to foreign
governments, you don't think he'd be freaking out
about that?
You damn right he would have because it
matters.
He just doesn't care when it's people he
doesn't like because he's a partisan hack. The
other side that is on the side
of the cartel members, on the side of
the illegal aliens on Right. You mean the
ones that weren't cartel members or the ones
that weren't legal aliens, but you're just claiming
that? So people that are fighting for people
who are neither of those things are supporting
those things? The side of the terrorists. And
you have to ask yourself,
are they technically
aiding and abetting them? Because aiding and abetting
criminals and terrorists is a crime in federal
statute, Rob.
Yeah. You mean, like, what you're doing with
Israel or many of the other countries around
the world or many terrorists around the world
or different groups you're funding to carry out
regime chain? Oh, that's okay.
We're going to threaten you with aiding and
abetting terrorism for fighting for Garcia who's neither
of those things because you claim he is
without due process or evidence.
I just it's just so obvious to see
how what a problem even if everything they're
saying is true, the way they're doing this
is so obviously wrong,
it blows me away that this is not
completely cascading over the top. Like, they haven't
just lost control of this by now. And
that's what worries me more than anything. How
is this still it's like the genocide in
Israel. How is it still going?
It really does give you a chilling insight
into where we really are, and it's not
where we thought we were.
Here,
Melnick points out the fourth circuit unanimously has
now rejected Donald Trump's request to halt the
proceedings into into Garcia's case. That was that
was yesterday.
So you see, they're still
trying to stop. While acting like they're not
bound by anything, they're clearly still in some
ways trying to win to get this to
go away. They know what's happening. And, again,
don't forget, the reason that in my opinion,
but I think it's obvious that neither of
them wanna give this up. Because if this
if he's forced to be brought back, they
will either have to prove that they do
nothing,
which then he then they'll they'll be very
politically unpopular with their own side, or they'll
have to go forward with the claims that
actually produce evidence, which they don't have.
They keep saying they do. And if they
do, then why wouldn't they just make this
they could easily make this go away. The
reason they don't is because it will become
a political fiasco because they know they're lying,
guys. It is the easiest thing to prove
in this conversation.
But so they've ruled again.
A Reagan appointee, Wilkinson,
wrote writes that the Trump administration's position is,
quote, shocking not only to judges,
but to the intuitive sense of liberty that
Americans still hold dear.
I'm gonna read this for you a second.
Whole thing.
He says, we yet cling to the hope
that it is not naive to believe our
good brethren in the executive branch perceive the
rule of law as vital to the American
ethos.
Here's the full decision. I think it's worth
hearing all of this.
So, again, this was from the seventeenth.
Gilmore,
Abrego Garcia,
Vasquez
Vasquez, excuse me, verse Kristi Noem.
Wilkerson, sir circuit judge,
with whom King and Thacker circuit judges join.
Upon review of the government's motion, the court
denies the motion for an emergency stay
pending appeal
and for a writ of mandamus or mandamus.
The relief the government is requesting is both
extraordinary and premature.
While we fully respect the executive's robust assertion
of its article two powers, we shall not
it seems things like that they use to
say, they just told us we could do
whatever we want. They plan on the ignorance
people. It's not all what that says. We
shall not micromanage the efforts of a fine
district judge attempting to implement the supreme court's
decision.
Right? So that's all they're just trying to
work their way through other courts to make
the clay. The Supreme Court has already ruled
this. They're just trying to uphold their decision
that's already been made. And this is their
effort trying to undermine that, and they've got
pushed back on.
And realize that that they the game of
making only political active Democrat judges has long
since been over,
especially since Supreme Court has six conservatives. The
bottom line is all over the place. This
is not what they claim it is.
It says it is difficult in some cases
to get to the very heart of the
matter, but in this case, it is not
hard at all. The government is asserting a
right to stash away residents of this country
in foreign prisons without the semblance of due
process that is the foundation of our constitutional
order.
Further, I mean, think about how important that
is, guys. That is the reality, and what
they're doing even with a criminal is undermining
that by not doing that, not giving them
the process that they are due, everyone.
Further, it claims in essence that because it
is rid itself has rid itself of custody,
that there is nothing that can be done.
This should be shocking, not only to judges.
That's in regard to them saying, we can't
get him back. It's not our fault. It's
not our responsibility even though it's both of
those things.
Shocking not to only the judges, but to
the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far
removed from courthouses still hold dear. The government
asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and
a member of MS thirteen.
Perhaps,
but perhaps not.
Regardless, and I'm gonna go into the actual
documents and the actual court cases and the
Supreme Court ruling, all of which tell you
there is no evidence. Even Grock
responding to what Bennie Johnson shared a screenshot
of saying there is no evidence to those
claims.
I'll go through it for the third time
today.
But it's saying regardless, that's why they see
perhaps, perhaps not because it is not a
verified reality.
Like I said, maybe it is. No. And
but there's no evidence to back that up,
and everything that the government's put forward has
been either proven to have been a lie
or or something that they're trying to manipulate
you into thinking, which is currently not the
reality based on the evidence that they hold.
This is regardless. He is still entitled to
due process. Yes, guys. That's a crazy thing
that we even argue against that. If the
government is confident in its position, it should
be assured that position will prevail in the
proceedings to terminate the withholding of removal order.
It's obvious.
The only reason they wouldn't go forward is
because they know they can't prove their claims.
Says requiring that the government prove by a
preponderance of their evidence that the alien is
no longer entitled to a withholding of removal.
That had to do with the political persecution
from El Salvador.
That's that's Bukele's government they're talking about, guys.
You know, the same government that removed civil
rights, that suspended the constitution,
removed the judges so they could run for
another another tour even though he wasn't legally
allowed to,
turning into a one party system, putting people
in prison without due process. Same thing, guys.
Welcome to the future of your country.
So the point is
that they are they did that for political
persecution from his government, and then they just
sent him back to that location.
My for for until if I hadn't have
seen him in in a meeting that I'll
show you in a minute,
I was wondering whether he was dead
because of this exact conversation. Was he the
person that Bucaille was going for?
But it says moreover, the government has conceded
that Garcia was wrongly or mistakenly deported because
they have. Here it is enshrined in yet
another court ruling because they did say that
publicly.
But it goes, why then should it not
make what was wrong right? Seems obvious. Right?
Rectify the mistake.
It says the Supreme Court's decision remains, as
always, our guidepost.
That decision rightly requires the lower federal courts
to give, quote, due regard for the deference
owed to the executive branch in the conduct
of foreign affairs. Right? That see, that's what
they keep trying to do. See, they just
said we can do whatever we want. That's
they're simply regarding what is static reality.
They're saying, yes. You have to do what
they're ordering. No one's trying to infringe on
your your perceived executive branch right powers. That's
not that's what they're saying.
Now it says, that would allow sensitive diplomatic
negotiations to be removed from public view. It
would recognize as well that the facilitation of
Garcia's return leaves the executive branch with options
in the execution to which the courts, in
accordance with the Supreme Court's decision, should extend
a genuine deference.
That decision struck a balance that does not
permit lower courts to leave article two by
the wayside. The Supreme Court's decision does not,
however,
allow the government to do essentially nothing.
See, that's the point.
He they're simply outlining, like, they'll just caption
this and go see, they said we were.
That's not the reality. And this is a
different one. I'm gonna go to the Supreme
Court ruling they're signing. This is an extension
of that, and they're still pretending like they
won.
The point is they're saying Supreme Court ruling
said they're trying to act like they said
we just have to wait and accept him
when he comes here. That's not what they
said. Not even what the word facilitate means.
It says it requires the government to, quote,
facilitate Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador
and to ensure that his case is handled
as it would have been had he not
been improperly sent to El Salvador.
It says facilitate
is an active verb. See, they're very clear
about this. It requires that steps be taken
as the Supreme Court has made perfectly clear,
and they know this, and they're just lying
to their blind,
uninformed followers. That's not a knock on one
side or the other. It's partisanship, guys. It
says the government should be prepared to share
what it can concerning the steps it has
taken. Now of which, by the way, they've
come back and said nothing. Like, they've literally
come back and said, we didn't do anything,
challenging them to make this is where we
come to the point of where they're being
held in contempt,
or that's about to happen, it seems.
The plain and active meaning of the word
cannot be diluted by its constriction,
as the government would have it, to a
narrow term of art.
They're just calling them point blank. They're calling
them out for what they're doing. You can't
pretend like that word means something. It doesn't.
It's obvious what we're acting for. It's an
active verb. You're supposed to be doing something.
We are not bound in this context by
a definition created by an administrative agency and
contained by mere policy directive.
Thus, the government's argument that it it that
it must do is that all it must
do is, quote, remove any domestic barriers
to his return
for stay,
says motion for stay at two that's referencing
the the point is to continue for the
sentence. Remove any domestic barriers to his return
is not well taken in light of the
Supreme Court's command that the government facilitate his
return and release from custody.
Quote, facilitation does not permit the admittedly erroneous
deportation of an individual to the one country's
prison that the withholding order forbids, and further
to do so in disregard of a court
order that the government not so subtly spurns.
Facilitation, in quotes, does not sanction the abrogation
of habeas corpus through the transfer of custody
to foreign detention centers in the manner attempted
here.
How do we not I mean, look. This
is either the Trump administration
bombastically
violating the sacred realities of this country or
it is being done for somebody else.
I don't it's about as simple as I
can make that. And you need to recognize
how clearly this is destroying this country.
Now it stops.
It's easily rectified. But if this keeps going
right now, we see I'm a I'm a
well, I'm a pause it right there because
I wanna I wanna make this point in
a second about where this goes if congress
does not do something about it. If he
pushes back on supreme court, nothing happens, and
they do nothing,
That very well may be the end of
this country in the sense of what we
believe we are. Maybe it's always been that
way, but we'll come to that in a
second. That's that is not hyperbolic.
I'll explain in a second.
This is allowing this would facilitate foreign detention
more than it would domestic return,
obviously.
It would reduce the rule of law to
lawless
and tarnish the very values for which Americans
of diverse views and persuasions
have always stood.
K. All they're saying is it would it
would make it lawless and undermine
American values.
The government is obviously frustrated and displeased with
the ruling of the court.
Let one thing be clear, they write. Court
rulings are not above criticism.
Criticism keeps us on our toes and helps
us do a better job. But the point
they're making there is if you disagree with
the ruling, then that's why this process exists.
Challenge it. Go forward.
The game they're playing where if a court
challenges their ruling, somehow they're trying to undermine
executive power is a game played on dumb
people to get you to think that they
president can do whatever they want.
It's not true.
Sure as hell where we might be and
are going,
but the way we pretend this country exists
from the constitution, that's not the reality.
Now it goes on to say,
court rulings can overstep, and they can further
intrude upon the pre prerogatives of other branches.
Courts thus speak with the knowledge of their
in imperfections,
but also with a sense that they instill
a fidelity to law that would be sorely
missed in their in their absence. I mean,
imagine if there was no pushback at all
right now from the courts. I mean, we
we would already live in the system I
think we're they're trying to create, if not
already.
Energy in the executive is much to be
respected, it says.
It can rescue governments from its last lastitude
and recalibrate imbalances too long left examined.
And, by the way, the exact same opposite
in regard to what the too much power
in the executive and the lack of power
from congress.
It says the knowledge that executive energy is
a perishable quality understandably breeds in patience with
the courts. Courts, in turn, are frequently attuned
to caution and are often uneasy with the
executive branch's breakneck
pace,
and the differences do not end there. Now
that's why they're important to challenge each other,
guys.
The executive is inherently focused upon ends. The
judiciary, much more on the means. Ends are
bestowed on the executive by electoral
outcomes.
Means are entrusted to all of the government,
but most especially to the judiciary by the
constitution
itself.
The executive possesses enormous powers
to prosecute and to deport, but with powers
come restraints.
If today the executive claims the right to
deport without due process
and in disregard of the court orders, what
assurance will there be tomorrow
that it will not deport American citizens and
then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?
That's exactly the point. That's, like, the that
is the crux of the point.
I argue
where they're building it towards. He's already floated
that idea.
And what assurance they continue shall there shall
there be that the executive will not train
and and,
train its broad discretionary powers
upon its political enemies.
This is just basic or or pretend let's
pretend you think they're the good guys. What
happens when the Democrats are in power?
It says the threat, even if not the
actuary the actuality would always be present,
and the executive's obligation to, quote, take care
that the laws be faithfully executed would lose
its meaning.
I think we're already there today, and that's
not left to right. That's just the way
our government's been driving for decades.
Today, both The United States and the El
Salvadorian governments disclaim any authority and or responsibility
to return Garcia.
We are told that neither government has the
power to act, which is just embarrassing.
We all know that's not true, obviously.
The result will be, of course, unless they
mean somebody else, by the way, who does
have the power over both of them. I
don't believe that's what they mean. Clearly, they
could both make it happen, but it's worth
pointing out. The result will be to leave
matters generally to Garcia, specifically in in an
inter
interminable
limbo without recourse to law of any sort.
Exactly the way they want that.
The basic differences between the branches
mandate a serious effort at mutual respect.
The respect that courts must accord the executive
must be reciprocated by the executive's respect for
the courts.
Too often today, this has not been the
case as calls for impeachment of judges for
decisions the executive disfavors
and ex exhortations to disregard court orders sadly
illustrate. Now it doesn't mean you have to
be okay with what they do, but the
the jump to do so is the same
as if they try like, this would be
trying to impeach Donald Trump because he said
the wrong thing one day. You know what
I mean? It's it's a waste of power.
It is a waste of resources.
And, ultimately, if they won, it would be
a bastardization of justice. It would be unconstitutional.
But, see, that's what's happening in the same
difference, guys. They're doing the same thing in
reverse.
It is in this atmosphere that we are
reminded of president Eisenhower's sage example. Putting his,
quote, personal opinions aside, Eisenhower honored his inescapable
duty to enforce the Supreme Court's decision in
Brown versus the Board of Education too to
dis to desegregate schools, quote, with all deliberate
speed. I think that's generally most what I
wanna read. Let me just skim real quick.
I didn't highlight it.
I'll I'll keep reading. I might as well
finish it. We're only one page left.
So it continues.
This great man expressed his unflagging belief that
the very basis of our individual rights and
freedom is the certainty that the president and
the executive branch and the government will support
and ensure the carrying out of the decisions
of the federal courts. Yeah. See, that's important.
This this brings us to the next point
in a second about where we go if
that's not happening. Indeed, in our late executive's
own words, unless the president did so, anarchy
would result, which I of course, you you
know why that's not the anarchy does not
mean that. Chaos is what they mean.
Now the branch has come too close to
grinding irrevocably against one another in a conflict
that promises to diminish both. This is a
losing proposition all around, probably by design. Clearly,
somebody benefits, just not in this country.
The judiciary will lose much from the cons
constant imitation
into intimations of this illegitimacy
to which by dent of custody
and detachment, we can only sparingly rely. The
executive will lose much from the public perception
of its lawlessness,
which is what they're doing,
and all of its attendant, attendant contagious contagion.
Excuse me. The executive may succeed for a
time and weaken the courts, but over time,
history will script the tragic gap between
what was and all that might have been,
and law in time will sign its epitaph.
It is, as we have noted,
all too possible to see in this case
the in the incipient crisis,
but it may present an opportunity as well.
We yet cling to the hope that it
is not naive to believe our good brethren
in the executive branch perceive the rule of
law as vital to the American ethos.
This case presents their unique chance to vindicate
that value and to summon the best that
is within us while there is still time.
Clearly, that's they're just giving them an opportunity
to
be the bigger person or do the right
thing. I doubt that's what's gonna happen. In
some, for the reasons foregoing, we deny the
motion for the stay pending appeal.
Now imagine pretending like that's them ruling in
your favor, which is what they're doing.
Sad.
Now one last point on the American part.
I probably should've put this first before that.
We already showed you couple examples of of
lawyers in this country getting sent letters to
tell them to leave the country. They they
act like it was a mistake.
Here's another one.
Today in these emails, which have been sent
to many people with full legal status, including
US citizens and green card holders, It seems
like this is a Doge special, which we
keep seeing. A rush use of tech filled
with errors that's created fear and confusion, maybe
by design.
This,
a Tucson Lawyer says she received a notice
from DHS telling her to leave the country.
She's an American citizen that was born in
Boston. This is more than one we've seen
now, guys. More than one.
But point is, green card holders, American people
are getting letters to tell leave the country,
and I
if they leave, they probably don't care.
This is a sloppy, if not designed to
be so problem that's happening.
You read for yourself. The government in mass
emailing people to tell them to leave The
United States even when they've got citizenship.
So all that in mind, let's go over
first the ruling about just people being sent
to El Salvador, That's which is separate than
the one about specifically Garcia, but they do
overlap.
This is, Camilo.
I'm not familiar with the account. Oh, it
looks like
a a reporter for CBS simply saying the
ACLU obtained the notice that Venezuelan migrants have
received, and this is important,
to inform them of the government's plan to
deport them via specifically the Alien Enemies Act.
Now this is reported as of the eighteenth.
Now it says the notice was signed by
an official today, but the migrant refused to
sign it. So you have to understand, as
of right now, today, they're doing two things.
They're still trying to kick people out of
the country without using the Alien Enemies Act,
without due process, which is obviously unconstitutional
for the obvious reason that we don't even
know. Maybe they don't even maybe they're US
citizens for all we know. They're not proving
anything. Then we have them still using the
alien enemies act despite the ruling from the
Supreme Court saying that they were required as
they should be anywhere else to give them
due process,
and neither of those things are happening.
So this is this is signed today. But
on top of all of it, what it
shows you is the frivolous nature of how
they're doing this. The ACLU now says deportations
could start tonight.
All of this is supposed to sort of
be on pause because of the way they're
processing all of this, but you can read
this for yourself.
Warrant of of of removal to any authorized
law officers. The president has found that this
is what's really important. Because that they're using
the alien enemies act, people are just acting
like he can just apply it to anybody.
No. As Bruce Bryant said in our conversation,
this is applied to and I I brought
this up early in this about a couple
weeks
ago around what this act is, and it's
applied to a state actor. That's why they
write this. This the president has found
that Trende Aragua is perpetuating,
attempting, or threatening
an invasion
or predatory incursion against the territory of The
United States and that Trendyarago
members are thus enemy alien enemies
for the removal under this act. You see
how that plays? So that's why they had
to declare a terrorist organization so they could
argue it with a state entity and if
they're actually formulating an actual invasion of the
country. Now that's not the same as saying
they're coming and leaving the country, guys. They
have not presented any evidence that there's a,
like, a formal invasion taking place with this
group.
They're making broad, unverified claims. So everything about
what they're doing is flimsy and illegal.
They don't need all of this. That and
the reason they tried to patch this together
is so they could avoid any legal repercussions
for due process for people that aren't actually
here legally, who are not criminals, or people
speaking bad about Israel. I think it all
connects, by the way, but just recognize how
important that is. You show me where they're
attempting, threatening an invasion of this country. Is
there some coordinated effort?
I mean, the people they're removing aren't even
parts of the gang.
Now it says, I am a law enforcement
officer authorized to apprehend, restrain, or move alien
enemies.
You have been determined
to be at least fourteen years of age,
not a citizen or lawful permanent resident, even
though many that are do giving these two
are those things,
a citizen of Venezuela and a member of
the gang, Trinidad de Aragua.
Accordingly, under this act, you have been determined
to be an enemy alien subject to apprehension,
restraint, and removed from the country.
That's it.
So they're not giving them due process because
due process would be where they're able to
see their accuser, being able to present their
evidence, and actually argue that's not true. See?
Here's how I can prove I'm not a
member of that gang. That's due process.
This just because they go, there's a process
that's not due. That is they're playing games
with words. That's due process is a constitutional
legal reality.
Giving somebody a process is not the same
thing.
It's embarrassing that people are falling for this,
guys. But what they're doing is now we
have evidence of what they're giving them, and
they refuse to sign,
and they're doing it anyway.
So here
is the Supreme Court ruling
that they are currently violating no matter which
way they're doing this. So, guys, this is
the one they're claiming. This is about just
people being sent to El Salvador, Venezuelans, Trente
De Arago overlap.
And they're this they're supposed to be abiding
by this, and they're not. They claim that
both of these were in their favor. They
were not. Now please read it. It's just
25 pages, but it's it's it's thin. It's
like this. It's worth your time to understand
for how many people are flatly
misinterpret
lying to you about this. Here are just
some of the important clips that I think
you should see.
So you can see this is the same
one.
It did so I'll just read it here
since it's the top right here.
It
says three weeks ago, the federal government started
sending scores of Venezuelans
detained in The United States
to foreign prisons.
It did so without any due process of
law.
That's just important to understand.
That is unconstitutional
no matter what, especially since what we can
now prove, again, for the hundredth time, is
that many of them, if not most of
them, are actually here legally or seeking which
is the same conversation. People seeking asylum in
the process of citizenship, that's not a legal
alien.
They're playing you.
Here's another one. The government expressly
agrees that Trende Aragua members, subject to removal
under the Alien Enemies Act, get judicial review.
Reply in support of application to vacate one.
It says, quote, it is well established
that the fifth amendment and more, by the
way, but that's what they cite, entitles aliens
to due process of law. And look at
that. They even cite Reno versus Flores,
where Scalia has spoken about this as a
conservative judge. Guys, it's obvious. It's in a
supreme court ruling, and they know this. And
people are screaming the opposite out there, that
they are entitled due process under law, whether
alien enemies act or not. And that's the
point is in this ruling, they made a
clear point to say they have to, as
it says below that. So the detainees are
entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard
appropriate to the nature of the case. That's
another ruling from another court case. More specifically
in the context,
AEA detainees must receive notice after the date
of this order that they are subject to
removal under the act.
The notice must be afforded within a reasonable
time and in such a manner as will
allow them to actually seek habeas relief in
the proper venue before so they can present
evidence. They can challenge the claim, guys. So
they're simply telling you you were required to
do that, and they're still not doing that.
So I'll just make that clear. This is
an example of them using the enemy
enemies alien enemy
alien enemy, Zach. I don't know why I
keep mixing that up. The point is they're
not giving due process, and that's verified right
in front of you. And we know that
already, though.
Here's one more. Please read it. There's a
lot of good stuff in here. Important stuff,
rather. The implication
of the government's position is that not only
noncitizens,
but also United States citizens could be taken
off the streets,
forced into planes,
and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity
for redress if if judicial review is denied
unlawfully before removal.
History is no stranger to such lawless regimes,
but this nation's system of laws is designed
to prevent, not enable their rise.
That sound like one ruling that they could
do what they want? It did not. And
they're lying to you about it.
Please read this stuff.
Now we're gonna go to the next one
in a second and read that one too
before we get there.
Richard points this out. And we we talked
about this, I think, it was on the
sixteenth, but I wanna reiterate this.
The New York Times broke this down and
looked into the original 238
names that they shipped to El Salvador, right,
for the gang members they claimed. The worst
of the worst, they said, rapists and terrorists.
Remember that?
They lied to you guys, and you can
easily prove it from even what we already
showed you. But we already and this is
what we already pointed out before, but to
reiterate, they found the evidence that only 32
of them committed what they called serious crimes.
And you can read it. Some of these
are that's not what they're claiming.
But it says the rest appear to be,
however,
minor infractions
or no criminal record at all
or no documented gang ties. Even the 32
similar serious crimes,
no one's proven in any way that they're
actually gang members.
Again, I would would not surprise me.
I'd almost find it stupid for them to
not at least find some of them to
hide the rest of what they're doing.
As he writes, this is simply a war
crime.
It's obvious what's happening here, guys, and you
can prove this. We already did. I've gone
over many of them on this show alone.
They know what they're doing. You have to
ask how this in any way benefits the
American agenda or the Republican agenda. It's obviously
for something else. And it could just be
the authoritarian control, and they wanna be able
to just do what they want, but clearly,
there's an interest for a foreign power here.
So most of them were not, I think,
quite frankly, none of them approved gang members
at all.
At best, 32 of them have serious crimes,
and of the vast majority of them aren't
gang members, aren't even maybe traffic tickets at
best.
Now on April 17,
this is very this this is just added
to that point. One of the Venezuelans who
Cristi Noem tried to render to El Salvador's
Slave prison. You know where she stood in
front of them and said they're all rapists
and murderers even though we can prove most
of them are not?
And she managed to avoid this person had
managed to avoid removal. I'm not sure exactly
how.
Was able to make it to immigration court.
And guess what? The government gave zero evidence
of the gang membership due and and basically
got removed.
Like like, removed for the process. Did not
get deported.
So, however, this person, as Aaron writes, this
is stunning. One of the plaintiffs in the
Alien Enemies Act case who did get taken
off the plane at a court hearing just
forty eight hours later, and ICE didn't even
offer one piece of evidence that he was
part of the gang, and he never got
deported again.
If he wouldn't, if that would he would
have been sent to El Salvador, and he
would never would have seen him again, and
they would have been calling him a rapist
and a terrorist like everybody else. The point
is they got confronted with that moment where
they could have, and they didn't have anything
because they don't have anything, guys.
The evidence has been clear from the very
beginning. This is so incredibly awful and chilling.
It's I mean, this is alarming as hell.
I just can't stress to you enough. This
is one of those moments where, you know,
I'm always so afraid in the past. Like,
I don't wanna be hyperbolic. I don't wanna
scare anybody. Like, if you're not scared about
this, you're not paying attention. And I'm not
trying to scare anybody. What I'm saying is
that this is a real thing that's happening.
It's whether it's even just the idea of
sending people who are here on green cards
to foreign prisons from to which they rot
in for the rest of their lives. How
is that not chilling?
And and the worst part for me, like
we like with Israel, not just that they're
committing genocide, but they stand there with a
smile and tell you they're saving everybody. That's
what kills me about the Kristi Noems and
Pam Bond, where they'll just yell down at
you like you're the one not supporting their
attack. You know, we're going after rapists and
murderers.
And what we're talking about is an a
guy with no criminal record who's got a
family who's scared about him being gone.
It kills me more than anything.
So Aaron points out that according to and
this is this is as of the and
this has been going up rapidly, by the
way. As of the sixteenth,
'13 hundred
student visas have been revoked. 1,300.
A number which raises rises daily, he says.
And like mister Ononda,
most appear to be people with speeding tickets
and other incredibly
minor enforcement interactions. You can read it for
yourself.
The evidence is undeniable.
And they're not even claiming otherwise, guys. Like,
even with the case of Khalil, which everyone
wants to put behind him because it's one
of the most obvious and it was how
it started, they admitted it was because of
his ideas. That's the best they can do.
Rubio put it in court, and then yet
they stand up and scream. He's an illegal
alien. No. He wasn't. He's a criminal. No.
He wasn't. He supports the laws. No. He
doesn't.
They just keep yelling the narratives, then people
keep falling for it, at least some.
The idea here is so wild to me.
1,300 students now overlap that with what they're
claiming. Right? They want you to believe we've
gotten rid of thousands of evil terrorists. They're
scraping grandmothers. Right? Dominic Trippie
points out, ICE has now said they've arrested
a thousand illegal aliens.
Interesting. Right? So over here, you've got the
information about over 1,300
of people that are, you know, traffic tickets.
Many of them are the the conversation we're
having. But then they frame it over here
from the republican side of this, not him,
but just the conversation of that side,
saying we've got rid of all these evil
men these terrorists.
Well, the reality is you can actually go
through the information and see that these most
of these people
are people that are, if even
breaking law at all, barely.
And that's I mean, friends, if if the
if the if the people I'd like to
accept from the beginning. If they're here illegally,
that is still a crime. But how many
of those people were
legally here? How many people were seeking asylum,
looking to get citizenship? Right? You have to
realize what we're talking about here are student
visas that have been revoked because of some
kind of small thing. And then they go
over here and say illegal aliens have been
deported.
Those are the same numbers we're talking about.
So you're being played if you think they're
going after bad guys as opposed to people
that are inconvenient for the power structure or
speaking about Israel. Same conversation.
As as Andrew rightly puts out, how about
the 3,000 missing kids? Right? How about the
Epstein list? How about everything else you promised?
Nope. We're going after thing people that hate
Israel.
Sad.
Now the Supreme Court
has said,
people must be given enough time as to
allow them to actually seek habeas relief. We
just read it directly from the Supreme Court
ruling. Right?
ICE, and this is as of the eighteenth,
is loading people on the buses
right now. This was earlier today.
Not even twenty four hours after giving notice.
So they're not doing it is the point.
They're blatantly disregarding
supreme court rulings, and this is important.
If this goes forward, the first clear moment
of supreme court defiance is here.
Now we had this conversation, and I've I've
been I'm gonna be continually joining them to
Scott discuss this. And this is with Jeffrey
from, Bitshoot and Bruce Fine, former of the
Reagan administration,
who is very, very well knowledged about this,
you know, of constitutional law, of of law
in general. And I find it to be
a very important conversation. Now we don't all
agree on everything. The point is that what
we're discussing is largely has been at least
this general topic, and I think it's very
important to understand. And Bruce brought up a
very important point about this. Right? So if
we get to this point, which is I
think where we are right now, where
basically, we come to the point to where
and we'll get to the the potential of
of,
being in contempt
where they disregard supreme court rulings. Right? So
remember Trump said, I love supreme court. I'll
do whatever they say, and then they ruled
against them, and he said no and did
something else. So, basically, wanted you to hear
that sound bite. So you pretend that's the
case and then went in other direction and
gave you a narrative to explain it away.
He lied to you is the point. He
lied and then did what he wanted, just
like Biden or or all the rest of
them. So the important part is that now
we're in a situation where we're now coming
to that head where he's been ordered by
the Supreme Court, and he said no.
So the only thing that can happen right
there is for congress to try to take
action,
begin articles of impeachment. You know, you're directly
violating the this is if you the if
that's not honored, then the system doesn't exist.
And so the point is that if he
then does nothing
and they try to impeach him, then that
will be the system correcting itself. Now if
congress does nothing,
what does that mean?
I mean, it's a pretty chilling reality. Is
that then that means that going forward that
we don't live in the country we think
we do because that's the end right there.
Nothing else will happen. Then Trump can just
disregard whatever Supreme Court rulings come or whatever
judges say because there's no mechanism through which
you can actually stop or force them to
do it because that's how that would work.
Congress has abdicated its power a long time
ago, guys. I think it's because they've been
completely bought off and compromised 75 different ways,
but we're there right now. Now, I'm not
trying to overhype this point. I mean, you
really think about that. The whole check and
balance of the system is the only game
we play with to pretend that we actually
have influence on this outcome. Now I don't
agree that's how it works, but I do
think if it did, if it was reality,
then that would make sense to me. And
I do think there's some like, they do
have to respect it in some way because
they want us to believe this works. But
even maybe it's whether I'm wrong
my point is that's probably not important to
include today. Let's just pretend I'm wrong. The
reality is that that's how we're supposed to
believe it works.
So
if we come to that point and Trump
and the whether Biden or Trump or anybody
else, if the US government just goes, we
don't care what you think.
Going past that, we don't you know, same
point. We just don't have any mechanism through
which to change it. So, effectively,
we're either finding out for the first time
that we or, you know, through this administration
showing that we're now no longer what we
thought we were, or they're exposing to us
that we never were.
Because it's just if you think about it,
there's no other moment in, you know, action
through which that we can actually change this
to go in the direction, you know, in
line with the constitution. But my point's always
been the same. As you go back plenty
of different examples, we can show that we've
already gone away from the constitution. This is
just the most chilling and obvious example that
I think is meant to be seen.
It's a good conversation. You can listen to
it. Now here's what somebody says in this
regard.
Now here this now here's the point from
before. Now I think I'm gonna go over
this in a second or maybe not. Maybe
I moved it over here.
Anyway,
this is the problem.
Is that we can go over this ruling,
which is right here, and show you exactly
what they say, which is that this is
lawless or that they're that basically showing that
they were wrong.
And yet you can have people like Miller
in this clip or Rubio or Pam Bondi
scream that they won somehow.
They're wrong. They're lying, guys, and it's easily
proven. The problem is that then you get
people like Chris Murphy who come out and
say that. I shouldn't even say it. The
problem problem is people that use that to
lie to themselves
and say a court order that he had
to stay in The United States, Supreme Court
ruled nine to zero, he was illegally removed.
They did. I just read it. Or, actually,
excuse me. That was the other one. Same
point, though. I'll read this next.
And Trump is pretending he won.
That's what's happening.
The problem is that people who are Republicans,
who are blinded by partisanship will go, Chris
is a dumb Democrat. So that means he's
lying. And ignore that case. It's lazy reverse
psychology, and it's working for some people.
I was saying this before Chris or anybody
else came out and said that. I show
in the context of, like, the government. Plenty
of other independent media were probably making the
same point even before me.
Chris says, this is a litmus test.
It looks insignificant.
Mark my words. Today, our republic was lost.
If the house doesn't bring bipartisan articles of
impeachment, we have voted the last time in
The United States. Now I argue that's not
gonna be the last time we vote. I
I don't think our vote translates now. So
they're sure as hell gonna keep you going
through the motions as long as they I
mean, that's a good way to think about
it, by the way. Let's just say for
sake of conversation,
tomorrow let's just say the Democrats are in
power, and suddenly they take action that completely
destroys you know, that proves that we don't
actually vote for them. But they keep the
process going. So people pretend it goes forward.
And you're over here going, guys, your vote
doesn't even matter, and the people still keep
voting and tell you you're wrong for not.
Guess what? That's where we already are. And
I've been doing that for a long time.
That's I mean, at least consider that, guys.
You can see you can end up in
a world where your vote has been changed
or they the process has been broken, but
they keep you doing it because they want
you to think you're in charge. Right? Yeah.
Consider that's what's been going on for a
long time. The point he's making is not
about some partisan thing. It's a larger discussion,
whether it's a democrat in power or not.
If we come to the point to where
the the Supreme Court is being disregarded and
nobody's actually trying to force the reality, then
we have lost what we think we had.
It's it's very it's a nonpartisan point, and
it's very simple. The problem is, people look
at this guy, says our republic was lost
because we deported MS 13 gang members. Calm
down, Nancy.
Again, bot or a very dumb person? I
don't know. The sad thing is he's not
a member of the gang. And the reality
is whether you're allowing somebody to undermine the
constitution for your petty grievances,
or this person says such an uneducated stupid
c u c k. Keep watching CNN. You
see how that works?
You don't even know what the person's making
an argument that's rooted in law, but because
it's against your chosen ideologue, you're a democrat.
People call me a democrat all the time
for making points that are nonpartisan.
Or people during COVID call me republican for
the same reason because we're blind.
Now here's Bennie Johnson
going, the DOJ releases documents for homeland security.
Now what we have, by the way, is
a screenshot that's been circulated,
which is rooted in I I here's what's
crazy about this. As best I can tell,
this is the same information that came from
the the the
the policemen that we've talked about in the
past. It's already been out there. It's already
the same thing. But because Johnson decides to
claim it's something new, it's been released, and
gives you a screenshot, all of the moron
followers grump, oh, we knew it. You're lying.
How about we take a look at the
document real quick?
So what he says is releases documents, and
he gives you one screenshot. So wonder where
the other plural documents are,
Showing the criminal alien who was deported is,
in fact, MS thirteen terrorist.
Big kick in the face to the fake
news. Okay. Let's just look first. Let's see
what this says.
Let's look through it in-depth. Okay?
Okay. So far,
I see Maria Salvatrucha
thirteen. I see
active member.
That's MS thirteen, by the way. That's the
the gang name.
Grant gang criteria.
Dress, frequent gang. Okay. I don't see anything
so far. Now it says approximately
detective blank
parking lot of Home Depot. Yep. We know
how this goes. 2 that's 2019.
That's the where he was picked up at
Home Depot and then not charged with the
crime and released, and they continue to pretend
he's a gay gang member.
Approached two individual approached the remember, the point
here is that they went up to this
discussion as a large it wasn't about him.
It was about
investigating MS thirteen activity. And so they apprehended
a lot of people. And as they approached
two the individuals, two of the individuals, reached
into their waistbands and discarded several unknown items.
All four were stopped. See how that works.
Under the
by this officer, immediately recognized one of them,
not this Romero, different person.
Two small plastic bottles.
Okay? Members of the Prince George County Gang,
Rene Romero,
sense of gang. Okay. So so far, nothing.
Gang member with the sailor click. Okay. The
whole thing so far about the one that
they were identified, Romero.
Officers also interviewed Jose Guillermo de Dominguez. Okay.
During the interview, officers observed tattoos at schools.
Officers
know these kind of tattoos are indicative of
the Hispanic gang culture. The tattoo is meant
to represent their okay. So so it's a
gang or a tattoo, they claim. No. That
doesn't prove someone's a gang
member. K. So far, and that says ranking
members
that represent MS
thirteen, Jose Guillermo Dominguez.
Okay. And then way at the bottom, it
says, officers then interviewed
Kilmore Armando
Garcia during interview officers.
Oh, weird. Then it just blanks out.
Funny how he didn't clear the next page,
which goes on to make the case that
these people were simply present and not actually
part of the gang, and they point to
this and go, every 13, we knew it.
You don't realize how embarrassingly stupid that is?
Guys,
this is not what it looks like. Okay?
Show me.
Subject has been identified as a member of
the gang. Okay? He's talk they're talking about
people being present.
Now I'm gonna I'm gonna make this very
clear for you. Okay? All you have are
association claims coming primarily from the one guy
that we've already talked about, who, by the
way, was charged the crime right after this,
which doesn't invalidate what he might have said.
The point is no case was ever brought.
He went forward
and was given asylum from a foreign country.
There's no evidence other than this one example,
and that's all they have. You realize they're
calling him a human trafficker right now. Right?
Okay. So read through this for yourself.
The point is all of this is about
the people that were around him and that
he was simply there. Now you could argue
that means he's guilty if you just wanna
jump to conclusions about anything. So that means
you're guilty simply by standing next to somebody
who might be something you don't know about.
And on top of that, recognize that the
idea is simply that all of them are
gang members because the government says so.
Here's what's important.
He eat rich, eat the rich says, hey,
Grock. Is there any definitive evidence that Kilmore
Garcia is MS thirteen?
This is Grock, by the way. It says
there is no definitive evidence Kilmore Garcia is
MS thirteen.
This is what I just, you know, went
over in those fuzzy documents he wants to
make you pretend you think make you assume
about. Claims stem from unadjudicated
02/2019
immigration hearings. That's what Bondi keeps pointing at.
And a questionable police report,
which we were just pointing to, but no
charges or convictions
exist.
You see how they're playing you?
Because the game is he was there.
The investigation was going on. We don't give
you the context of how it went forward.
And because he was simply present, and I'll
show you the per the cop who made
the argument that he was because he was
there. That's all that's happening.
His legal team and family deny the gang
ties, and judges have questioned the allegations. The
Trump administration's claims lack public proof and may
be politically driven. That's grok.
Not that that should make it the truth,
but it just shows this is even what
Elon could be tampering with. That's what you
get.
Okay. Then this person goes grok. What about
the information just released by the AG?
Is that
not on your system yet? Hence, you're still
saying old information? You see how they they're
trying to feed it to say what they
want. Here's what it says. The
information released by AG likely refers to the
DHS statement on 04/14/2025.
It does claiming Gilmore Garcia's MS thirteen member.
However,
no new conclusive evidence was provided.
They simply pointed to the old thing and
said something new. It's nothing new.
Fact checking sources and legal analysts question these
claims, citing a questionable 02/2019 police report. It
all stems back to that. Gee, like we've
been telling you from the beginning.
No charges. No convictions.
My system is up to date. By two
but as of 04/16/2025,
the evidence still does not definitively prove Garcia's
gang affiliation.
And this person simply says
where was it?
Grock owns the MAGA cult morons again.
I think it's funny. I mean, guys, it's
you you and ask somebody else. Ask don't
don't ask an AI. Look into it for
yourself. So which begs the question,
does Denny Johnson know that? And is he
just lying to you, or does he not
care at all and just goes along with
whatever the team's four republican narrative is because
that's what gets his paycheck signed?
You tell me. He's wrong, by the way.
He's not, and that's not what that shows
you.
How crazy is that?
So at the end of the day, it
stems to the same report that we've already
talked about from 02/2019.
No charges, no convictions. He was released. Nothing
happened. And, of course, the main part was
I'll just go to now is this stems
to a a an example from a let
the and we've already gone over all this.
It was so frustrating we have to repeat
all of this.
Actually, let me
I don't wanna go into all that right
now. I wanna go over the let's just
do real quick. So I'm I wanna go
into the actual Supreme Court ruling, but that's
gonna pull me away from this exact point
we're making. So here,
the point is the mayor the police officer
who was involved with that, okay, was arrested
right after this.
The Maryland police officer who formally arrested Garcia,
so and, again and that was at remember,
no charges, no convictions because he was there
was no evidence to back it up.
In 02/2019,
when he was detained for the first time,
was subsequently suspended from the force for serious
transgressions,
giving confidential information about a case to a
sex worker. The officer, apparently a senior detective
on Abrego's case, Garcia's case, in 02/2019,
Ivan Mendez, according to that was one cited
that that was the one on that paper,
who is also a member of his current
legal team. Mendez was subsequently indicted for his
offense, pleaded guilty, and received no probate and
received probation.
So Greg is simply saying the cop who
initially arrested him was
subsequently suspended and indicted for serious professional misconduct.
Now that doesn't prove he's that doesn't make
that this just like the the right right
now is claiming, which we'll get to next,
that, that they they're, you know, that this
the one thing is,
some document circulating
or or what you can see on his
fingers, by the way. Where is that? Sorry.
I'm trying to jump ahead.
We'll come to it.
Basically, this document where somebody's claiming he beat
his wife or something. And who knows? Wouldn't
surprise me. So now suddenly, if you're have
a domestic abuse problem, now you're a gang
member because we say so? The laziness of
this is insane, and all it shows you
is the kind of mission creep. Now we're
just trying to muddy the waters with his
reputation because he's not father of the year.
I just can't believe Americans in any context
will be okay with this.
You're being convinced to be to undermine what
you believe in because you wanna be because
Trump says so, because of partisan ideology.
Now I'll come back to it. I'll go
through all this. I just wanna make sure
you saw that. So the case here is
interesting
because the evidence already shows you that there
was no charges, no convictions.
But on top of that, the guy who
wrote this out, the person they're pointing to
as the inside that that guy was removed
from misconduct.
So as I said, that's just as the
the right is trying to do now, but
say, well, he'd be his wife. Therefore, it's
okay. This all lines up is the same
in a river. I wouldn't do that. The
fact that he
the cop has some kind of current transgression
does not then verify that he was lying,
but the point is we already know there
was no crime, there was no charge, and
the cop turns out to be corrupt. That
has to matter.
But doctor Bennie Johnson apparently.
And here's the Supreme Court ruling in regard
to Garcia specifically. Okay?
Again, read it. It's only four pages long.
Maybe we should just read it all the
way through. I I feel like it's important.
I had a few shots.
Where are we at right now?
We're almost three hours.
Here, let me let me read through it
real quick.
That's not that long. Let's just read that.
So I I have the screenshots in case
you missed something. They're important. Let me read
this.
03/15/2025,
the United States removed Gilmore Garcia
I was trying to skip it. Abrego Garcia
from The United States to El Salvador where
he is currently obtained in the Center for
Terrorism Confinement, CCOT.
The United States acknowledges
that Garcia was subject to a withholding order
forbidding his removal to El Salvador and that
the removal of El Salvador was therefore illegal.
They've admitted all that. And on top of
that, that it was for political persecution,
not some gang activity they keep trying to
claim. Like, as if he's gonna be killed
by the other gang. It's not what they're
claiming. That's the cartoonish thing they're saying in
front of people that don't understand the situation.
The United States represents that the removal of
to El Salvador was the result of an
administrative error. United States alleges, however, that Garcia
has been found to be a member of
the gang MS thirteen, a designated foreign terrorist
organization that his return
and that his return to The United States
would pose a threat to the public. See,
that's how they play that.
They keep claiming he's a terrorist, and we
can't bring him back because he would hurt
people, but that's not even what they're saying
publicly. It it's like a cell if you've
never started you haven't proven anything, you can't
keep pointing to what you said there to
prove the next thing you say. But it
goes Garcia's response responds that that he is
not a member of MS thirteen and that
he's lived safely in The United States with
his family for a decade, which he has,
and has never been charged with a crime,
which he has not.
On Friday, April 4, United States District Court
for the District of Maryland entered an order
directing the government to, quote, facilitate and effectuate
the return of Garcia to The United States
by no later than 11:59
on April 7. On the morning of April
7, the United States filed the the this
essay, they waited until the seventh to do
that on purpose, filed its application to vacate
district court's order. Chief justice entered administrative stay
and subsequently referred the application to the court.
The application is granted in part and denied
in part. See, this is what they they're
trying to pretend that means they won.
All they did was grant the part that
was removal the effectuate aspect.
I'll keep reading. It's very clear. They're just
blatantly lying to everybody. Remember, this is the
one that Miller and the White House and
everybody else kept screaming was them winning this
case.
It says in part so application is granted
in part, denied in part, subject to the
direction of this order. Due to the administrative
stay issued by the chief justice, the deadline
imposed by the district court has now passed.
To that extent, the government's emergency application is
effectively granted in part, That's the part about
removing effectuate.
And the deadline in the challenged order is
no longer effective because they're past it, obviously.
The rest of the district court's order remains
in effect.
Right? That enough right there. It shows you,
but requires clarification on remand.
The order properly requires the government to, quote,
facilitate his release from custody in El Salvador
and to ensure that this case is handled
as it would have been had he not
been improperly sent to El Salvador. That seems
pretty obviously clear. The intended scope of the
term effectuate
in the district court's order is, however, unclear
and may exceed the district court's authority. We
already read this before. The district court should
clarify its directive with due regard for the
title deference owned to the executive branch in
order in the conduct of foreign affairs for
its part. The government should be prepared to
share what it can
concerning the steps it's taken and the prospect
of further steps, which we just read to
you on the follow-up, makes clear that they
were like, you're not doing that. We ordered
you to give us your steps, not just
stand back and wait.
The order henceforth entered the chief justice is
vacated. So the follow-up already shows you on
top of that that they are what they
pretend this means. It does not.
Statement of justice Sotomayor with whom justice Kagan
and justice Jackson join,
The United
States Government arrested
Garcia in Maryland and flew him to a
terrorism confinement center in El Salvador where he
has been detained for twenty six days and
counting. To this day, the government has cited
no basis in law
for Garcia's warrantless arrest, his removal to El
Salvador,
or his confinement in the prison, nor could
it.
The government remains bound by the immigration judge's
two thousand nineteen order, clear,
Expressly prohibiting Garcia's removal to El Salvador because
he faced a clear probability
of future persecution.
Like, let's be clear again. You think persecution
means from gang violence?
Persecution.
That's government.
And
demonstrated that El Salvador authorities were and would
be unable and unwilling to protect him,
obviously.
Now it says the government has not challenged
the validity to that order.
Instead of hastening to correct its egregious error,
clearly, citing again that it was an error,
they made a mistake, or they did it
on purpose, the government dismissed it as an
oversight.
The government now requests an order from the
court permitting it to leave Garcia,
a husband and a father without a criminal
record, in a concentration camp that I'm adding
is what it is, for no reason recognized
by the law.
Does that sound like winning?
The only argument the government offers in support
of its request that United States courts cannot
grant relief once a deportee
crosses the border is plainly wrong. You listening,
Stephen Miller?
He knows he's lying is the point. The
gover he's he's trying to play dumb people.
So think about what that means if you've
been played by that. He thinks you're stupid.
The government's argument moreover implies that it could
deport and incarcerate
any person,
including US citizens without legal consequence so long
as it does so before a court can
intervene.
That's been every ruling now from the one
about the general Venezuelans being sent to Garcia
specifically
to the follow-up ruling.
Everyone seems to be aware of this in
the judicial system. That's the pro that's the
reality, guys. And so that's why right now
they're pushing back and the congress is showing
itself to be inept, to be compromised.
That view refutes itself
because every factor governing requests for equitable relief
manifestly weighs against the government. Again, there's shiding
rulings across this whole thing, I would have
declined to intervene in this litigation and deny
the application in full.
Nevertheless, I agree with the court's order that
the proper remedy remedy is to provide Garcia
with all the process to which he would
have been entitled had he not been unlawfully
removed to Venice to El Salvador.
That means the government
must comply
with its obligation
to provide Garcia with due process of law.
How do you misunderstand that? So that means,
Stephen Miller, that you just win and leave
him there?
You're a very dishonest, manipulative person, I argue,
working for a foreign government. How else will
you misunderstand that?
It says including notice and opportunity to be
heard in any future proceedings.
Reno versus Flores right there. It must also
comply with its obligations under the convention against
torture,
which they're not because they're torturing people over
there. That's been plainly it's been called out
by human rights groups.
Federal law governing detention and removal of immigrant
immigrants continues, of course, to be binding as
well. See, that's an important point to consider.
Just there's there's laws in this country binding
how it can happen to people they deal
with. So when they send them to a
foreign terrorist
or, you know, an an authoritarian country with
no legal reality, with no civil rights, with
no process, that violates your US law in
another way. They don't care.
It says requiring a warrant before a noncitizen
may be arrested and attained pending decision or
removal. They're just citing another case, guys, another
US law. You are required to give them
process, due process,
constitutional rights.
It says and the government must provide adequate
notice and promptly arrange an initial informal interview.
They're not doing that right now to afford
the alien opportunity to respond to the reasons
for the rev for the revocation stated in
the notification.
Moreover, it has been the government's own well
established policy to facilitate
alien returns to The United States if the
presence is necessary for continued administrative removal proceedings.
That's that's been that's there's no pushback. That's
happened many times in the past. So this
game they play where it undermines executive authority,
they're just playing on ignorance, guys.
It says, especially in cases where a noncitizens
remove pending immigration proceedings.
It finishes by saying,
in the proceedings on remand, the district court
should continue to ensure the government lives up
to its obligations to follow the law.
Imagine framing that as winning this case in
the way that you claim it's going.
How dishonest, how stupid people must be.
Blindly supportive.
Well, he writes, this is air, this is
Bondy. We already played this by the way.
Now we've been long, so I'm not gonna
play it. This is where she basically says,
you know, we have if we brought him
back, it would just be a little more
paperwork,
literally brushing over due process.
As as Aaron says, if mister Abrego Garcia
is returned as requested by the Supreme Court
as required, I should say that's what he
wrote, required,
then ICE has to go through a process
to revoke his withholding of removal. Like, the
argument being that we have to we'd have
to remove
the original ruling that he's not allowed to
go to El Salvador or send him somewhere
else, but the all of it required due
process. They know that. They don't have the
evidence because they can't prove what he they
claim he is.
So it says they'll have to prove a
judge conditions have changed. He'd then be able
to seek protection again.
Now all that's a
like you said, you know, due process.
And this person just wrote, I can't believe
attorney general the the attorney general of The
United States just said that all will happen
is we'll have to give him if we
give him back, is we'll be given due
process. Like, that's something to brush over.
These are the people in charge of this
country, guys. That has to be pretty scary.
Now here is what she's is what Leavitt
said. Now we just went to the court
documents. We went through what the governments are
saying.
Has anybody seen any allegation of human trafficking
anywhere?
It doesn't exist because they're not even claiming
that. But yet here they are continuing to
cite this in front of people. As Aaron
says, as far as I could tell, this
claim of human trafficking was first put forward
by herself, which I guarantee came from the
Trump administration.
No government attorney has ever made such an
allegation,
nor has any government official ever provided any
evidence to suggest it, yet they keep claiming
this. The Benny Johnsons of the world keep
saying it.
Imagine being his family, and you know he's
an innocent person. He's not part of this
gang who's suffering in a foreign prison, and
they just keep lining and I'll tell you,
terrorist, a human trafficker.
How are we allowing this?
Abrego Garcia was a foreign
terrorist. Nope. He is an MS thirteen gang
member. Nope. He was engaged in human trafficking.
Nope. He illegally came into our country. Nope.
And so Every single one of those claims
are false, guys. Every single one of them.
Now, you know, I will walk it back
in regard to whether you originally, the point
is
when he was dealt with in this conversation,
he did was here. He was here legally.
And if if you think somebody coming in
and on top of that, realize that in
many of these cases, we've already shown you
are people that are seeking that process. But,
fine, let's just say back in 02/2018,
you came out of this country illegally.
Then charge him with a crime and put
and and and deport him to the normal
process. The idea that you're I mean, why
would you have to manufacture all these claims
because they're trying to do something different? I'm
wondering what the bigger connection is here,
genuinely.
Can we if if we dig through their
social media, we we find claims about Palestine
or Israel. Is there something more going on
here? Is there something that El Salvador wanted
from this man? Like, how does it possibly
make sense that they would just lie this
blatantly knowing we can all see through it?
Deporting him back to El Salvador was always
going to be the end result. There is
never going to be Which is which is
the one thing that's illegal in this conversation
other than the constitutional
due process discussion is that the court ruled
he was not allowed to go back to
El Salvador in particular because of political persecution
from the clearly despotic country.
That's the only thing in there. And they
that's they're just skipping right over the top.
A world in which this is an individual
who's going to live a peaceful life in
Maryland because he is a foreign terror He
was. Ten years with the family. No criminal
record. But she wants you to believe that's
not possible because he's a terrorist, which he
wasn't, and they can't and they can prove,
you know, on and on and on. Like,
think about continuing to cycle through this. You
have the evidence they lived there for ten
years with his family.
No crimes.
Harris and a MS thirteen gang member. Not
only have we confirmed that, president Bukele yesterday
in the Oval Office confirmed that as well.
Oh, okay. So the guy that you your
your partner in crime just reiterates
what you said out loud, therefore that confirms
it? This is the evidence they want you
to take face value.
What leaders of government say.
That should feel that should feel pretty uncomfortable
for those of you pretending to fight the
deep state, the rebels,
as you're just blindly regurgitating power structures claims.
So he went back to his home country
where he will face consequences
for his gang affiliation and his engagement in
human trafficking. I'm not sure what is so
difficult about this for everyone in the media
to understand.
Evidence.
Evidence. Leave it. That's what we all understand.
Give me the evidence. Your statements of the
claims repeated are not evidence.
Insane reality. Can you imagine what will happen
if they if they somehow get this person
back? And at the end, we and the
evidence does get presented in a in a
very clear scene way that this is not
the case? Or how how about just we
already did that, quite frankly. How about just
the human trafficking claim she keeps screaming?
What happens if you can't prove that? Will
she be held accountable for slander?
Of course not.
But they should be.
God only knows what's happening to these innocent
people. And I mean, innocent people who are
here legally in many cases who are struggling
in El Salvador because leave it this this
monster in front of you is screaming that
they deserve what they get.
You deserve what you get. Leave it. And
hopefully that comes around. And it's appalling,
truly appalling that there has been so much
time covering
this alleged,
human trafficker.
Alleged. Oops. That was a mistake, wasn't it?
You didn't mean to say that. Gang member,
MS thirteen gang member.
It's truly Yeah. She's struggling. Okay? Because all
you have is righteous indignation when everyone knows
you're lying.
That's why this position has gotta be the
worst thing in the world. I say it
every time.
As far as I could tell, he says
the claim of human traffic was put forward
by her first.
There is zero evidence. Let me say that
again. Zero evidence. They don't even claiming that
in court.
Now here it is again. This is from
Homeland Security,
toeing the line, doing the exact same thing.
What really matters to Americans
is that this MS thirteen gang member Yep.
Who unfortunately, Jay, you and a lot of
your colleagues have called a Maryland man when
it reacts to the
situation. Tricia? Wait. I gotta stop you there.
What's your evidence that he's in MS thirteen?
So here's what's crazy about this. You know,
you go on Fox and OAN and the
rest of them, and there's zero pushback about
floating those claims.
But then, of course, when they go on
the Democrat channels,
they stop and go, what what's the evidence?
And, of course, that gives people on the
right. They're, oh, we all see. They just
don't they don't understand and ignore it,
which I'm convinced is a small minority right
now, but it's the one screaming the loud
at the top of the conversation.
But just because ABC or CNN
finally do the right thing in this moment
does not mean it's not the right thing.
Asking for evidence of a claim like that
is what we should all be doing. Of
course, I don't believe ABC or CNN give
it care at all about the outcome or
the evidence. They just start using this to
make political points in my opinion, or I'm
jaded. The point is
because they do, it does not make it
wrong. They're using that to convince you that
it is.
Well, there's actually been two separate immigration judges,
Jay, who have confirmed
and ruled that he is a member of
MS thirteen. That is well not true. We
are entirely convinced. It it was brought up
in deportation, Jay. But what's the evidence that
was brought up in those deportation proceedings that
he's been with us for this year?
I can do this all day, Jay. He
is a member of MS thirteen. I don't
think you'd wanna be his neighbor, Jay. I
It's the same exact thing they keep saying.
They're they have talking points. If he was
your neighbor, you'd move right away. That's what
Miller said. Right? He's not father of the
year, they all keep repeating.
It's just blind repeat repetition.
What she just said is flatly a lie
whether she knows it or not. And what
he tried to say behind her but see,
why wouldn't he keep pushing that point? It's
what we just went over. No. That's not
what happened.
But he just lets it go for the
most part. Sure. One and I don't think
many Americans watching would wanna be this individual's
neighbor. He has been involved in human trafficking.
He's been involved in labor trafficking, and he
should not be in this country. So the
argument is that you wouldn't wanna be next
to him. What does that have to do
with anything? How is that a legal argument?
There's no evidence to back up anything she
just said.
So whether he's in a now Salvadorian jail
or a US detention facility, I am so
very glad as are millions of Americans that
he is off of US streets. Uh-huh. Because
remember, Jay, who is MS thirteen? They maim.
They rape. Oh, so yes. So now we
lurch into, look at all the bad things
they did. That means he's a bad guy
because you claim something you can't prove. That
is guilt by association.
That is mission creep or whatever you wanna
call it. That's what they keep doing.
As we'll show you in a second, as
it continues to fall apart, where they go,
well, maybe he's not a terrorist, but but
he sure is a bad guy. And then
they oh, but look. His knuckles have weird
tattoos. Now how do we know? They are
flailing right now. Because I get the sense
this is not gonna go in their favor,
and it's gonna be really bad. Or they
just stand their ground and completely destroy this
country. They kill Americans for sport, and the
American people are done with it. They said
so on 11/05/2024.
Of course. Because the fake election means we
get to do whatever we want, and you
all support us whether you want to or
not. The sad part about this is, of
course, we're talking about, you know,
different gang activity, the the the the cartels.
If you understand MS thirteen
or the inner workings of the cartel dynamic,
then you already understand how much the Israeli
agenda is intertwined with that. Or US government
intelligence is overlapped with these very conversations. But
we won't get into all that because that
only muddies the waters. At the end of
the day, it's obvious to see these things
in and of themselves
are not what they appear to be. But
that that is irrelevant
because these people are not even part of
that. So it's it's like it's like the,
you know, manufacturing your thing and then pretending
you're part of that thing. It's very easy
to do as long as you've got a
rabid following of people that will shout anybody
down for caring about what we should.
Whether it's a killer or a jaywalker,
I care that you have rights.
It's just sad. But so, again, back to
the original point, why would he not push
back?
I think there's a reason for that. I
think this is an agenda. Now as Aaron's
pointing out, so prove it. Present any
evidence that he's part of MS 13. That's
not the tainted police informant stuff from 02/2019.
Because that's what we're talking about. We're talking
about a guy who was fired for being
a corrupt cop,
who put on this thing that he was
connected, and that's the only thing anybody's ever
gotten. There's nothing, and that's why he was
released. That's why even Grock told you there
is no evidence. Everybody since then has said
this is baseless. That's why he wasn't in
jail. Six years ago, that's what we're talking
about. He says, you keep making these claims,
but the moment you have to show them
in court, you refuse, which they've been doing.
You're the federal government. Show us the evidence.
Now that's about the broad points. The part
of human trafficking that she just triple said
three times, that's nowhere.
That's the craziest part about it is they
I think they're aware that they're lying about
all of it, so why not just add
crazy things that we're not even claiming to
get people online saying that? You I don't
even think she knows that. She does not
seem like somebody who's in the know, quite
frankly. She's she's somebody that's gonna be thrown
under the bus when it comes around.
He goes on to say, you have the
power of the federal government behind you.
Get the evidence and make it public.
You haven't had any problem doing that for
other people. You've given their names, their crimes,
their faces, their tattoos.
Prove it.
I should make sure this was
yeah. Same one. Then he goes on to
say, you know what happened when judge Zenas
looked at the evidence the Trump administration gave
her about Garcia? She made it clear that
the evidence was not there, and there was
no proof that he was part of MS
thirteen, as we already showed you. No evidence
before the court connects Garcia to any other
criminal organization. Even the recent rulings we just
showed you made it clear that that was
at best up in the air.
Wouldn't they have given the evidence to the
court
if they had
it? He says, we know that evidence the
judge reviewed in 02/2019,
hearsay or hearsay on hearsay, a document filled
out by a detective suspended weeks later for
secrets
selling secrets, which claimed an unknown confidential informant
said he was MS 13. That's what it
comes from. See, I I didn't say that
today, but we wrote we went over that
the first time. It's it's secondary information from
an informant for that person that they wrote
down.
Again, all of this is why even Grock
can discern that there's no evidence that that's
why it was all put away. It says
the immigration judge of 02/2019 didn't know the
context behind the gang worksheet. With what we
now know in real court, its evidentiary value
is completely nil.
So referring referring to her speaking in the
video, if you have any proof,
show it.
This is also you know what else you
should prove, that he's connected to human trafficking.
A very serious accusation you're making publicly without
giving any evidence. Neither DHS, DOJ has ever
suggested to a judge or immigration or federal
that he's human trafficking. Here are the facts.
Garcia lived here for fourteen years.
He's never been charged with a crime. He's
married to a US citizen, and they have
three kids. Now as far as I understand
it, that makes you a US citizen.
The only country it was illegal to deport
him to was El Salvador. That was the
only one. He was deported to El Salvador.
They claimed by mistake.
Now down here, it says update. Bondi released
what she claimed was new evidence. We already
pointed to that. That's what they Grok just
told you was just regurgitated information, and it
was nothing but the tainted 02/2019 worksheet, which
by the way, we've already been talking about.
This is not new, guys. And all you
get is this weird cycle where suddenly the
same Benny Johnsons of the world cite the
same dumb thing and repeats back around again
with a different narrative, and we have to
shout it back. That's why I'm frustrated by
this. We went over this the first time
this came out.
It says, so they really don't have anything
from the last six years. Not a single
piece of new evidence, but the word of
a disgraced cop.
That's the best they can do, guys.
Oh, and here this is again, same point.
So this person go so asking for evidence,
it goes, here you go, and literally cites
the exact same thing.
The statement made by the same thing, the
one group, the one cop, this informant that
turned out to be completely baseless, enough charges
released, nothing.
You have to understand how insane it is
that they just keep jumping down this cat
this that means to me that they're desperate
because they don't wanna go get in charge
for something or this is for some other
agenda, and we don't even understand yet. Like,
this is important that they rush this out.
I I don't know.
As he says, that's literally the same thing
we just talked about. It's you can read
it for yourself.
Oh, and this is just the same just
I included that again for the information about
that cop background. If you wanna look into
it, we went over this more. I mean,
the Daily Mail wrote an entire article about
this. How this I mean, it's it's all
out there for you if you just can
ignore the partisan screaming.
Now here, as of the seventeenth,
representative Dan Mizer says, maybe he's not a
terrorist, but he's potential terrorist. See how they
start start to water this down as it
gets more and more ridiculous.
And so he gets deported. He's here illegally
with a United States Senator and a bunch
of knuckleheads in in in the house. He
wasn't here illegally. They now say their main
priority is bringing back someone. Maybe he's not
a terrorist,
but he's a he's a potential terrorist. He's
he's a terrorist watch list person.
What does that even mean? So am I
according to them.
I mean, I mean, guys, we can't just
let them fly with stuff like this.
You if you just if you guys been
claiming he's a terrorist and a human trafficker,
and I started and now you're going, well,
maybe we we we just think so.
Wow.
Can you imagine? I mean, think about where
we are right now. Where now they're going,
well, you know, we this looks like one
for sure. Yeah. That sounds a hell of
a lot like we've been hearing about the
war on terror our entire lives.
These are monsters, guys. All of them. They're
using you.
Stop falling for it. They wanna bring them
back? You saw the El Salvadorian president. He
laughed. He said, why in the hell would
I bring back a
potential terrorist? No. No. No. No. See? Now
you stumbled across your own game right there.
He said terrorist because that's what you guys
said. And what he said is, well, I'm
supposed to smuggle one of the terrorist in?
Well, the only thing that makes that sound
crazy is that you guys keep pretending as
a terrorist. You literally just let the cat
out of the bag by making sure we
knew that you're assuming that
or lying about it. To put someone in
prison for the rest of their life, it
doesn't deserve it because, you know, freedom and
democracy. Back to United States when his home
country is El Salvador.
God.
This person says in response to that,
none of that matters. He was illegally here.
See how see how that works? Round and
round we go. It never ends, guys. And
Raymond says, does due process in the constitution
not matter in this country anymore? He says,
he entered the country illegally. What due process
has he afforded? Yeah. All of it, by
the way, you uninformed idiot. I shouldn't say
that. I'm frustrated. He never got claimed he
entered
it doesn't matter. Everyone gets due process. You
see, we're battling against people that are truly,
like,
deceptively misinformed.
Like, they're being lied to by the Johnsons
and by everybody else out there. They're misleading
people in the most alarming ways when it
matters the most.
Here he is. Speaking of mister Johnson.
Holy smokes, he says. Caroline Leavitt decimates
the left for protecting a criminal alien terrorist.
Yeah. All the things that we know aren't
true.
Over, guess what,
Rachel Warren,
person who was killed that has literally nothing
to do with Garcia at all.
But you see what they're doing is now
because people are beginning to see the game,
what they're now just getting emotional conflation.
Here, an alien over here, kill this woman.
How dare you fight for this guy's rights
who isn't illegally here, who wasn't a criminal,
and who's now been set up? I mean,
really? Is that the best you can do
to say that we should just list off
things that have happened by illegal aliens? Okay.
Fine. What does that have to do with
whether Garcia is being lied about or not?
They're just trying to get you to be
outraged
and pretend like protecting the person's rights here
is you protecting other bad people. It's not
true.
It's the same as pretending that if they
send me to a foreign prison that you're
pretend that you support Hamas.
See how that works? No. I just support
the person that you're trying to lie about.
Or a Palestinian protester who you call a
terrorist. No. Pretty sure they just support Palestine.
But you see how this works? You get
people that act who are afraid to stand
up because they don't wanna also be called
a terrorist.
Well, some of us aren't afraid to stand
up.
And media outrage over the deportation of Abrego
Garcia. No. It's not just Democrat media, but
see, that's the best they can do. They
need you to think it's a partisan game.
I'm of the mind that most people are
very well aware of this. That's not just
I'm I'm not just saying that. I don't
say it about every topic.
There's very clear continuous games going on here
where I think from COVID to this, it's
been it's been it's been gradually increasing. I
think we're at a point right now where
most people are not buying this.
The best they can do is to try
to get you outraged about the other side
because they that's their bread and butter.
You don't you think you think there's just
lefties and media calling this out?
You're insane if you think that. An MS
13, El Salvadorian,
illegal alien criminal Nope. All lives. Who was
hiding in Maryland has been not Hiding in
Maryland. No. He was publicly living in Maryland,
had a job, had a family, fourteen years.
You just see just small lies like that,
guys. If they were be if they were
knew what if they were there if they
believed what they were doing was right,
why would they need to lie like that?
Hiding in Maryland?
You don't you're not hiding when you're literally
publicly living with a family and working.
That's them trying to water this down and
act like he was some secret eel alien
hiding in this country when he was a
functioning member of the society paying taxes as
a as a and married to an American
citizen.
That is because they need you to be
on their side because I think they're losing
control.
Nothing short of despicable.
Based on the sensationalism of many of the
people in this room, you would think we
deported a candidate for father of the year.
Yeah. That's like the seventeenth time they've repeated
that exact talking point.
Where what does that even mean? Where's that
even coming from?
Because indeed, they're trying to make it personal.
What families and children, you're a terrorist, and
you're they're just trying to get people emotionally
outraged. That's it. That's the best they can
do. You know how easy it would be
for them to go, here's the evidence. Like,
they just tried to pretend they did. Like,
when they released the Epstein fake information or
the JFK manipulation, and they go, wait. We
did it. Right? And they wait to see
if you fall for it. And we all
went, nope. That didn't do it. And they
go, oh, wait. Truckload. I just found.
It's the same game.
They dump out the old 02/2019 information we've
all talked about and hoping that liars like
Benny Johnson can get you a jump at
it, but it's not working.
That's because, unfortunately,
many in this country care more about this,
quote, unquote, Maryland father, illegal alien MS thirteen
gang member than a Maryland mother. And in
Ah, okay. You see how that works? So
what she's saying we care more about is
a a person whose rights are being violated.
The rest is nonsense or rather irrelevant.
It could be an American citizen, an illegal
immigrant, a green card holder, a Visa card
holder. It you are allowing them to violate
that person's rights. Whatever the narrative follows, you
don't care about the constitution. So the best
she can do is to go,
you care more about this person's rights rights
being violated than you do about a completely
unconnected story about a woman being murdered over
here by a different person.
That's what she's about to do.
Then a Maryland mother and an American citizen
who was brutally murdered at the hands of
a different illegal alien.
What does that have to do with anything?
The the what the suggestion is that if
you allow people who are here to not
be randomly deported with no due process that
you're you're okay with her being killed?
I mean, that should insult the hell out
of you. That's bastardizing
her memory for their political outcome. That's disgusting.
Talk about despicable. That's what they are.
Of course, I am referring to Rachel Moran.
And if you didn't see yesterday, a Maryland
jury found illegal alien, Victor Antonio Martinez Hernandez,
guilty of murdering Rachel Moran in August of
twenty twenty three. Still waiting for the connection
here.
What what's the argument here? The guy wasn't
here illegally in the first place, so literally
nothing connects with what you're trying to say
here. You're trying to scare people into believing
whatever you claim because outrage story, which by
the way is horrifying, and nobody should be
okay with that. But they're the crimes are
the point is, guys, you're conflating things that
have no connection.
There's nothing to do with Garcia that has
anything to do with this. They need you
to believe that he's capable of what they
did to her. That's what they're trying to
do. It's lazy, and dumb people fall for
it. She was a 37 year old mother
of five who was jogging in an otherwise
safe community Northeast Of Baltimore when this monster
ambushed, strangled, and beat her to death before
stuffing her brutalized body in a tunnel drain.
See what I'm talking about? The Morin family
finally got justice yesterday, but they will never
get Rachel back. Our hearts go out to
Rachel's family, her five children, and her mother,
Patty, who has suffered the unimaginable loss of
her daughter. You're disgusting.
The worst of the worst. And whether she
wants to be or not, you're part of
it. You are literally the face representing the
worst thing we're talking about right now. You
are disgusting.
How dare you use her name to downplay
some to to hide your criminal activity behind
an outrage story? Not the fact that it
happened that we that we shouldn't care about
it, it, but the story you're using to
outrage people to hide your criminal activity.
And on top of that, use I mean,
you're you're trying to take someone innocent and
put them in this position in the context
of what you're claiming, whether they're innocent of
other past crimes that you wanna make up
in your mind or if there exist that
you haven't proven
to just put this person behind bars
and using somebody else's Travis tragedy to do
so just god kills me.
These people are disgusting, and they're everywhere right
now.
Speaking of that,
holy smokes. He decimates the left for protecting
a not criminal alien, not MS thirteen, not
terrorist because of Rachel Moore.
And see, if you look at the comments,
guys, look, there's a lot of people that's
that are following him, that are Republicans, who
are doing things like this.
Pam Bondi, the the inaction figure. No talk.
No cuffs. They're all going, guys, where are
all the arrests you promised? That's what most
people seem to be saying right now. Even
even if they agree with what's happening here,
they're like, okay. Fine. Where are the arrests?
You're only going after Tesla tech people that
are and in in that case, I haven't
seen any real follow through on that.
But anyway, another conversation. There's really no action
being done.
Oh, but here's Jack Wassobic jumping in to
do the same thing. Same day, by the
way, because there's totally not coordination at
all. He says, I mean, can you even
I can't I I almost laughed when I
saw this. Talk about clumsy or just maybe
they're just as stupid. Did Rachel Morin get
due process?
Did Lake did did Lake did Lake and
Riley get due process?
Both both of which were murdered.
No one ever asked that.
Wait. Okay. Let let me walk you through
this, Jack. How exactly are people who were
murdered supposed to get due process?
Talk about the dumbest argument of the day.
Like, you broke the Internet with your stupidity.
Or really, it's just trying to use this
to get people mad. You know what it's
trying to do? It's conflate the idea that
people being murdered by by illegal aliens
suggest that you shouldn't care about due process.
How do you even connect those two things?
It's insane. But here comes one of his
follower idiots going, these freaking illegals are not
eligible for due yeah. They are, though. Yep.
They are. Yep. They are for due process
like everybody else. They're not eligible for due
process. Well, martial law says, yes. They do.
And post the reality that yep. Yep. They
do.
And this person goes
and she just cites an image from cat
turd. Says, sob stories about illegal gang members
don't move me one bit. Has no business
here in The USA. I
again, and this is citing somebody else.
I will not stop fighting until I see
my husband alive. Oh, disregard the wife and
getting his husband back. Sob stories about illegal
gang members. So not illegal, not a gang
member. But who cares? Because Kat Durr is
not in this for the truth.
How you can argue that due process wasn't
given to people that are murdered. I mean,
it just it is gross.
I just can't stop. So these are the
worst people that I see every day. Disgusting.
The kind of people that use the worst
of suffering to make other people suffer while
claiming they're saving people.
The villains out there.
And JD says the entire American media on
the left see the same way. They're all
framing the same way.
The entire media and the left wing industrial
complex have decided the most important issue today
is that a Trump had been deported in
MS thirteen gang member.
Nope.
What we care about is that you're violating
the constitution, that you don't seem to care
about, Vance, which doesn't surprise me at all.
But James simply says, once again, if this
guy had had just been deported, which is
what they want you to think just happened,
this would not be a story. The reason
it's important is that Trump had the set
had is that Trump sent
this guy to prison for life even though
he was never even arrested for anything, let
alone convicted.
Fourteen years, he was in The United States.
See? They could've just gone through the normal
process, but then they would've had to prove
information.
Same
point.
Bondy is saying, not a Maryland man. An
illegal alien. Lie. Lie. Lie. Lie. Over and
over and over. And this person says, you're
lying.
He was granted withholding of removal. We can
read the court documents.
He has zero criminal charges. He was sent
to die in a prison without due process.
Take off your cross, you shameful hypocrite.
K. That's and that's the right framing to
get the term. When they allowed him to
stay here because of risk of political persecution,
the withholding of removal,
that was what gave him the legal right
to be here.
It's very simple. We went over this the
first time we talked about this. And here,
oh, this is what I was gonna show
you earlier. And this is salty Texan,
sixty one thousand saying,
he's a violent, illegal alien thug who beats
his wife.
Right? Because mister Andy knows he's never been
caught misrepresenting documents before or flat out lying.
Right? Now look. I'm not even this to
me, this is wildly irrelevant.
This is a a document where it says
he domestic violence, whatever that means.
You realize how many people in this country,
how many people that are on the Republican
side of this conversation who are screaming about
this evil terrorist have been accused or charged
with domestic violence? Does that them make them
a terrorist? Does that mean their due process
rights don't matter? Like, what are we even
arguing here? That because he has domestic violence
and some background charge from his wife that
we suddenly don't care about his due process
rights? Or that he shouldn't be should be
sent to prison to life somehow makes that
okay.
I just don't understand where we are anymore.
And if this is what most people think
and I can't fall into that, I can't
believe that.
It's insane.
But that's the reason that's being pushed forward
is because of the Republican screamers and the
idiots like Posobiec and the cat dirts out
there who are shoving in their face what
the government handed to them while pretending to
fight the deep state,
which is the lies we keep showing you
over and over and over. Or but now
that we're like, well, he may not be
a terrorist,
but now you're getting all the side narratives.
Well, but look, he's not father of the
year. Look, he beat his wife. Look over
here, he's got tattoos on his hands. He
must be everything we're claiming without evidence. Right?
Certainly could be. You know how you can
prove that?
Evidence and due process.
Pretty simple. Right?
Well, here's what we're getting. Right Angle News
Network, another one of these new Republican
two hundred thousand followers already. That's how this
eco stuff, the the Musk Twitter x AI
system works.
Breaking, it says. His MS 13 tattoos. You
see how lazy this reporting it is? Guys,
nobody has proven these.
Look. I keep my point is the same.
For all we know, he is a member
of the gang.
But it matters to me that we prove
these things and don't start now that they
have been backed into a corner to where
the evidence they keep trying to scream at
you has been shown to be not what
they claim it is, Well, now you're getting
stuff like this. This is from today
saying, well, he's got things on his fingers
that that we we argue, like, in a
very q and on sense. And, look, what
they write out, it may make it
like, it could make sense.
I don't know if that's the case. For
all we know, it could mean something else.
Seeing as how we've got people in prison
with autistic
flag tattoos
or people that have mom and dad tattoos
who are not gang members, we've proven that,
who are in El Salvador, maybe we should
start asking me how flimsy this has become.
But it says his MS 13 tattoos were
caught on camera during his meeting with Chris
Van Hollen.
Visible were a marijuana leaf representing an m,
a symbol resembling either a skull or a
smiley face for s. That seems a little
bit ambiguous. And the number 13.
Okay. How about this? How about he's got
those tattoos because he wanted to be part
of the gang? Does that make him a
gang member? No. It doesn't. Or how about
he got them because he has a friend
that's in the gang? My point is we
can't keep assuming whatever makes the government narrative
make sense. Even if he is a gang
member, he needs to be proven to be
that. That's due process. That's the only thing
I've ever argued. I'm not I don't think
anybody honest is over here trying to make
the case that we know this person has
no skeletons in his closet. Everybody does. My
point is whatever the claims, they need to
be proven in court because that's the constitution.
It's amazing how the constitutionalists are arguing against
that.
But this person goes, it gets even better
and shows this image.
Well, to me, that looks like a pineapple.
But
we're all assuming here. Right? So let's just
assume into whatever makes sense for my narrative.
Right?
Or what looks like a smiley.
And then over here,
I mean, you tell me.
Does that look like a 13?
Can you even read that?
I mean, my point is neither can anybody
else. Everybody is looking into whatever they want
it to be. And you know why? Because
Donald Trump made it a thing.
That's where we are. Now here's a better
picture of it.
Okay.
So give me the 13 and all that.
The skull is now three and the smiley
face is an s. How does that work?
I mean, you could make these things in
anything just like QAnon can make it whatever
they want it to be. How about the
point is that you're required to prove this
if that's the case, not you took a
picture of his his
tattoos back in 02/2019
and then tried to make the case and
it didn't stick and there was no allegation,
he was released, and now you just wrap
it back around. You realize that this wouldn't
be Trump doing this right now? I mean,
for all but this is posted by Trump,
just so you know.
Why would he do that if it's already
a slam dunk?
They're flailing. There is no this is not
present that would not hold up in court
is the point.
But
here's saying, anyone on Twitter telling you this
is a winning strategy for Democrats should be
mocked. Who is talking about Democrat? You children
are lost in this left right paradigm.
People are talking about this or not going,
Democrats are right. Your Republicans are right. We're
saying you're violating the constitution, whoever supports it.
Look around.
These people are being laughed at by their
own supporters in a lot of cases. Look
underneath.
It says it only pays plays well to
their psycho far left base. It's it's the
best they can do, guys. That's it. And
he cites the same thing.
So despite the court documents that you all
got caught lying about, despite the evidence that
you claim was there that doesn't exist, despite
the claim to things that aren't even on
the table right now, the best you can
do is point to some fuzzy pictures of
his knuckles.
Right. And then and this was twelve hours
ago.
Your point is
Donald Trump posted this today.
So recognize that they did this first and
Donald Trump
follows up.
Doesn't that seem a bit strange to you?
He says, this is the hand of the
man the Democrat should should should feel should
be brought back to United States because he's
such a fine and innocent person.
I mean, I just am absolutely completely floored
that the bet what we're dealing with is
the president of The United States showing you
a picture of his knuckle tattoos and without
anything else other than floated claims and saying
that is enough to send a person to
a foreign prison for the rest of his
life.
I mean, are we actually even arguing that
being a part of that gang is enough
to send you to a foreign prison for
the rest of your life?
Where are we?
I just want people to stay I wanna
see some more momentum out there
of people that I know are there, that
are in the partisanship, that are not complete
blind morons, that recognize that even if he's
part of the gang, this is still a
major problem
because no due process was given regardless, which
is only the only real point. What we're
doing here is trying to dive into to
show you that they're even lying on top
of that.
For what reason?
Even if you wanna believe he is, even
if he is a gang member, they still
are using that to undermine the constitution like
they're doing with everything else.
Kills me.
But look for yourself.
Right? If that's the case and you wanna
make these allegations that he's part of this
gang, just like everything else, it needs to
be proven, especially for somebody who's married to
a US woman for fourteen years in this
country with a family who has no criminal
record.
And the only thing you have is the
allegations from a cop who was disgraced that
was turned out to be false even according
to Grock.
Aaron points this out.
Here's the clip of them shouting about evidence
when people ask and the evidence is that
we have evidence. Not a joke. We've already
played it for you. They're going, where's the
evidence? And then she says, the evidence is
what we've shown you, and we have the
evidence.
Great. Thanks, Bondi. Real well put. They've called
him a human trafficker, a violent criminal, a
convicted gang member. They refused to give a
single piece of evidence, but the best they
could do is Trump holding an image now.
Bond even suggested they all they have is
the gang worksheet from 02/2019.
But here's what you get because this shows
that they're not desperate. Right?
New York Times says senator meets with wrongly
deported Maryland man. They admitted he was wrongly
deported, guys.
And and, of course, the White House, you
know, really kind of reactionary meaning these days
trying to pretend like they're in the inside.
They do this the same thing people have
been doing about their dumb reports,
and he crosses it out and says and
they read it as senator Meese with deported
MS 13 illegal alien in El Salvador who's
never coming back.
That's what the White House wrote.
Knowing they're lying, knowing that they're wrong, knowing
that what they did violated the constitution, and
the bet they're gonna make fun of you
for it because Chris is a Democrat. Therefore,
Democrat's bad. Therefore, we can just make fun
of him.
Well, as Aaron says, the White House press
shop lies to and claims Abrego was not
wrongfully deported despite having acknowledged that
fact at every single stage of the process.
That's where we are.
Why would they lie about that if they've
said it publicly and they've done it in
court and everyone's written about it? Because I
think they're trying to confuse people. I think
we are doing something much more damaging than
just them trying to achieve a political end.
You know what I think? It's much bigger
than that.
Well, we're already past three and a half.
They just went into quickly what was I
gonna get to here? Extra cases we'll go
over possibly tomorrow.
So I'm not gonna be gonna get into
what you said. I said in the beginning,
Chris Van Holland going there felt very political
to me.
Now either way, I'm glad it's happening because
it's getting more attention on it. He's there.
You can see we got to find out
he wasn't dead. But I still think it's
problematic because
people in the right are acting like because
he's there, therefore, we know it's not it's
democrat, and it's just lazy the thinking in
all of this. But he says, we're coming
up on a month. Not a single person
sent to seek God has been able to
have a phone call. So he says I'm
aborting his flight to go to there to
see him. That's what this was about.
Then he says he would he he he's
in El Salvador
fighting for the return, he says. And Trump
admin can lie all they want, but the
court said they failed to show that he
was part of them as their team. They
did. We already showed you that.
So them pointing to his finger knuckle tattoos
is just a desperate effort to try to
make you feel that still. What you know,
the point is not whether we know for
sure that he's not, which I think the
evidence already shows that there is no the
same claim the the evidence is not there.
He he denies it. His family denies it.
His lawyer denies it. The evidence does not
back it up. The best they have is
the insinuation. Like I keep saying, though, for
all we know, there's more that we don't
see. The point is as always that they
have yet to prove that, which is all
that matters.
A game where they get you subjectively going
along with what they want you to think
because, well, look at him.
How are you that dumb? How are you
that willing to allow the government to use
your personal opinion to drive their agenda?
The point is they have not shown that.
Whether Van Hollen says it or not doesn't
change the reality is the point. But here
it says they were denied entry at Secott,
which, you know, it doesn't that doesn't seem
that crazy to me. It's a foreign leader
or, you know,
a congressman going to a foreign prison.
You know? So to me, it felt pretty
politicized in its own right. I don't I
don't understand why he thinks he would have
access to that even though the point is
that this is the Trump administration's responsibility to
rectify it.
But he got to sit down with him,
and he says my main goal of the
trip was to meet him. Tonight, I had
that chance. So why they let him do
it? Right? I mean, with all the talk,
why did the why did they decide to
let him do it? I think it was
for a very clear political reason. Now whether
Van Holland knows that or not, I think
we're I'll show you next what ended up
happening. I think it was what they meant
to do. Basically, he called his wife to
pass along the message.
So here they are. Here's the table.
So here's another shot. Here's Bukele
Bukele
saying, kill more Abrego Garcia miraculously risen from
the death camps and torture. So here's what's
funny. He's trying to downplay, like, act like
you're hyping these dangerous prisons for something they're
not despite the fact that he's the one
that has floated those ideas as what they
are. He's he's praised what he's done to
these places.
You you see how insane this is? So
he's the one in every other context that's
been, look at what I turned them into.
I'm I'm arresting people, scooping up anybody with
a tattoo, put them in prison forever because
bad guys are going to prison and crime
is down. Like, just being an
authoritarian and and then
laughing about how bad the prisons are, talking
with Israelis about what they're doing to prisoners.
And then when he comes back, he downplays
that by acting like that's a Democrat thing
because he's playing into the same political
fervor.
They know what they're doing. It's like him
acting like, oopsie. We got him. Now I'm
coming back, and what can I do? It's
not within my power.
Like, he's just he they are playing and
laughing at all of you while they're the
ones that are looking stupid. But but right
now, him downplaying death camp and torture is
him downplaying what he said these places were.
But he goes now sipping margaritas with Van
Holland in tropical paradise in El Salvador,
and then shows an image of what appeared
to be
drinks.
What what everyone's talking about? Oh, look. They've
got two margaritas in front of them. He
can't be suffering that bad, which by the
way, even if they were just genuinely drinking
margaritas,
the guy that was plucked out of a
concentration camp prison that they've all praised as
being exactly like that to sit down to
talk to somebody is not in any indication
that it's not bad in the prison. That's
like saying that guy that
alien murdered that woman, therefore, he's a bad
guy. It's lazy.
That doesn't change the fact of what he's
dealing with. But here's the craziest part. This
is why I think this is deliberate and
why Bukele posted that on purpose with the
image of the margarita.
They're very lazy. They're very clumsy at what
they do. It came out from the New
York Times. You can read it for yourself.
Mister Bukele in his social media post even
crowed that Kilmore was miraculously riven from the
death torture camps was now sipping margaritas.
But according to a person familiar with the
seeing the situation,
a buccal aid placed the two glasses with
cherries, salted the rims in front of the
table in front of mister Van Hollen and
Brago in the middle of their meeting in
an attempt to stage the photo.
So people that were in the room saw
this.
Why would you do that?
Because you are in an effort of a
political framing. You're trying to get favor because
you know you're losing.
I just think this is insane. It's obvious
what what's happening right in front of us.
Now Trump officials could face criminal contempt over
deportations
deportation,
over the ongoing deportations.
That's up in the air right now. As
I understand it, they've got about a week.
I think it's right here. Yeah.
So, basically, this is the court. This is
the see, as always, guys, we will give
you the documents. You could read it for
yourself. We may go forward to the with
this more as it develops, but Erin's highlighting
this. This is the court ruling that they
can they might conclude that they find them
in criminal contempt. Criminal contempt is interesting, different
than civil. Now I'm gonna wait to go
into it more in-depth because to see what
happens. Because right now, that's where we are,
where it's saying US Federal Judge has given
Trump officials one week deadline to comply with
his orders or risk being found in contempt
of court, potentially setting up a historic clash
between the two equally powerful branches of government,
which is where we're going with this. And
if they just keep standing the ground, guys,
this could be the end of or always
has been, maybe showing us the new end
to what we ever thought we were. And
again, that is not hyperbolic, guys. This is
a big deal.
Judge James Bolsberg said the most obvious way
for the officials to avoid contempt was to
assert custody over a group of more than
200 people who they deported to El Salvador
without due process.
I was saying is rectify the problem, and
it goes away. That they won't because they
know that they'll be forced to prove that
they don't have evidence, which would make them
even this would make it an even worse
problem for them. So they are just taking
the consequences even if it destroys the country
because they get they don't wanna prove that
they were wrong. That's what I think.
The White House denies any wrongdoing and has
depicted the group as terrorists and criminals even
though we know that's not true in most
cases.
It says there and that's that's even according
to their own information. That only 32 of
them even have serious crimes in general. There
is also a possibility of Trump administration officials
being found in criminal contempt for which the
punishment would include jail time. Problem though is
that even it says that, even
Trump has the power power to pardon criminal
offense. Right?
So but the president does not have the
power to issue pardons for civil liability. So
the argument is it will much more likely
be civil contempt because then this is the
check this is the problem with the way
the system is, and they know that. They
this is the whole Andreessen Karp teal kind
of mindset. It's just lie, challenge the judges,
and move forward. They've made this case before.
They're doing it around the world. We're watching
a coup take place in a very weird
way, but I think we see it.
Now we're gonna go over more of this
as he Aaron has one last point on
this, actually. This is about the the law
or the he said, basically, the most important
aspect of this that no one's talking about
in the public debate. It is outright illegal
to sip to pay a third country to
imprison people in any context.
It is. And on top of that, what's
interesting is when it comes down to the
financial aspect of this, when they're saying this
is brought up in our conversation that, well,
just stop paying them. And they're like, well,
that's for congress to decide. Like, oh, okay.
Now the one time, now it's congress's decision
even though we don't care what they say
anywhere else. They're playing everybody.
They really are. Now the last couple examples
here is that this, Ozturk,
they're now declaring her a dangerous fright flight
risk.
No criminal record here legally.
PhD student.
No reason to argue that other than she
doesn't like Israel, rather she called out their
genocide in a very formal and logical way.
No racism. No claims anything crazy. Wrote an
op ed with multiple people about how they're
committing genocide. Very simple. And, of course, that's
why she was targeted by Israel that the
US government happily obliged,
scooped her up with no warrant, no identification.
That should outrage everybody by itself, but there's
a hundred examples of this now, all these
Republicans are screaming about why it makes sense.
You're destroying this country. Not because of the
left or the right, because of your government.
Her crime co op writing an op ed,
but they're declaring her a flight risk so
they don't have to let her out because
this is going to be it's gonna get
worse for them. They look, guys, they know
what they're doing to the point to where
they're hiding is every way they can having
any more evidence come out about what they're
doing.
The barber that was arrested,
all of these people were not given due
process. All of them have been proven to
not be what they claim. This whole threat,
we'll go over it more.
As it says right here, neither Andre, Neera,
or Taro, any of them
who were sent to El Salvador got due
process. No judge ruled their part of the
gang. No jury convicted them as criminal charges.
They weren't even told what was happening to
them.
Think about that.
2025, and they're picked up off the street
when they're living in this country. Mo many
of them legally, some of them seeking asylum
or citizenship. They weren't even told what happened
to them, guys. How is that
anything you think represents this country?
Well, because you pretend they were all breaking
the law even though most of them weren't.
I'll skip all of that.
Yeah. Just other examples of the same thing.
Here's an example of what they're doing with
a Guatemalan immigrant,
no criminal record, who was at who was
there
just to in regard to this process,
Waiting inside the car for their lawyer,
and this is what they did.
Dragged him out of the car.
And you realize, guys, this is not violent
criminals. This is they have no criminal record.
They're simply immigrants. They're trying and and this
is how you go about this is this
is the war on terror for dissidents.
Not to say that's what's happening here. My
saying is that the I the way they're
dealing with this, the war on terror, the
war of terror
allowed them to start using wild authority in
very violent ways for small it's like stop
and frisk or whatever else we're talking about.
It is a rapid violation
under a guise that you may be okay
with in the moment.
So your government does every day of its
life. Now they're doing it right now, right
in front of you.
Here's another example of somebody they arrested, and
this is an Israeli speaking up for one
of them, saying he was part of a
peace group, bridge building between this, working with
Israelis and Palestinians.
They arrested him and deported him under the
guise that he was a a criminal,
terrorist.
And, Boutemath says it may it you don't
shouldn't have to have the endorsement of Israelis
in order to have afforded basic rights.
Trump administration is eminently planning on deporting an
18 year old with a pending asylum claim.
As always,
he has an asylum claim.
That's here legally.
He's trying to seek the legal process whether
asylum or citizenship, and they don't care.
They're violating US law
and not giving them due process.
And, yeah, and why, guys? This is the
important one.
Claiming that he's part of Trende Aragua. Why?
Because he has a picture on Facebook with
a friend holding a water pistol that ICE
thought was a gun.
It's in the documents.
This is where we are.
I'm gonna end with this clip that I
think is very relevant,
shared by TrueStream Media.
I played it before, I think. It's from,
mister robot.
But, you know, the point here, guys, is
just just to
speak out.
Have the courage to actually say what you're
thinking, not just to have these thoughts about
how wrong this is and how bad it
is, but just keep it internally because you
don't wanna be called, you know, anti American
or Democrat or Republican or whatever else.
Not there's never been a more important time,
I mean, ever in my mind, just to
stand up for what you know is right.
No matter what it challenges, no matter who
it challenges.
Because right now, a lot of us, like
this clip is gonna end with. We have
this internal dialogue.
Now we've got the fear. We recognize it,
but we have we find one reason or
another to just say nothing.
Say nothing. No problem. I'm okay. And move
on. The sad reality is you're not okay.
Things are happening, and you see it. And
we need to do something, or every single
moment this goes forward, we are gonna lose
one more piece of what we're fighting for.
I mean, what are we doing here if
we're not trying to save of of all
things the constitutional reality of this country?
Please,
I plead with you. Take the time to
look into these claims, stand up for what
you know this country. I mean, the foundational
elements of everything this country is.
I mean, look, I've got plenty of criticisms
about the state of society in general.
Regardless, as I've said many times, you can
see the foundational importance for what this is,
what the constitution is right now, and what
they're doing and how this changes immediately.
The reality of your life.
I just can't stress it enough.
Stand up.
Find the courage to speak out.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Sorry. It's dumb dumb street mirror settings. Hold
on. Or just dumb me. I don't know.
I can't figure it out. What is it
about society that disappoints you so much?
Oh, I don't know.
Is it that we collectively thought Steve Jobs
was a great man even when we knew
he made billions off the backs of children?
Or maybe it's that it feels like all
our heroes are counterfeit.
The world itself is just one big hoax,
spamming each other with our burning commentary of
bullshit masquerading as insight,
our social media faking as intimacy,
or is it that we voted for this?
Not with our rigged elections, but with our
things, our property, our money.
I'm not saying anything new. We all know
why we do this, not because Hunger Games
books makes us happy, but because we wanna
be sedated.
Because it's painful not to pretend because we're
cowards.
Fuck society.
Elliot,
you're not saying anything.
What's wrong?
Nothing.